Slashdot Mirror


Credit Card sized 5GB HD to arrive late this year

An anonymous reader writes "PC World reports in this article: "The card actually has moveable parts inside its thin shell," says Bill Heil, vice president of StorCard. A spinning wheel made of Mylar is engaged when the card is inserted into a StorReader, a USB-connected drive or PC Card that reads and writes to the StorCard. The reader is expected to retail for under $100 and the cards for under $15 each, Heil says. The StorCard and StorReader are scheduled to become available in the second half of 2003."

330 comments

  1. Brings new meaning to by yatest5 · · Score: 5, Funny

    filling up your credit card with hard disks...

    --
    • Mod parent up! [a] by Anonymous Coward (Score:5) Thurs, June 31, @13:37
  2. Credit Card sized 5GB HD to become late this year by glrotate · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Rather odd grammatical construction, no?

  3. size .. by jest3r · · Score: 5, Insightful

    so the drive itself is actually the size of a PC card at the minimum .. as you need the media and the reader together to constitute a drive ..

    1. Re:size .. by dizco · · Score: 5, Funny

      Er, and you need a PC card reader to put the pc card in.. and a computer to put that in.. and some way to power the computer.. hell, this thing ain't that small. It barely fits in the back of a pickup.

    2. Re:size .. by Jethro+On+Deathrow · · Score: 1

      No... what it says is that there is a USB reader or a PC Card reader.

    3. Re:size .. by RedVortex · · Score: 1

      So what is it? Just a very very small 5 1/4" floppy... Nothing very new here.

      Well, maybe for the storage space but hey! we're in 2003 now! Things like that have become very common, like flying cars and enery transporters so what the heck?!? A 5 gig floppy disk, bah ! Ordinary stuff...

    4. Re:size .. by nullard · · Score: 1

      More information about the cards here. The have magneti strips, are slightly flexible, and cheap. I just wonder how fast they are. Will they replace my Zips or DVD-RAM discs?

      --


      t'nera semordnilap
    5. Re:size .. by steveha · · Score: 1

      you need the media and the reader together to constitute a drive

      Yeah, but you can carry 5 of these, plus the PC card media reader, in a lot less space than 5 PC cards.

      And if the media is $15, 5 GB, and flexible without data losss... I will buy at least 5 of them. To start with.

      And they will no doubt make a smaller version, say the size of CompactFlash, for cameras and such.

      steveha

      --
      lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
    6. Re:size .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      .. or a smaller (avatar) shark drive?

      I've got 2 gigs (that was a lot back in 98, I didn't have any video) of archives that I can no longer read (because my drive died).

      ZIPs are still around (they helped kill the shark), so if the price is low enough (which the shark wasn't), it might pan out.

      Though this time around, I won't take the risk of being an early adoptor again.

  4. Not for use in a laptop? by PhysicsGenius · · Score: 2, Funny

    This thing doesn't have much mass but it's going to have a huge rotational inertia. I can see somebody carrying this in a laptop and walking around a corner only to be flung to the ground. I guess if they installed two, one upside down the angular momentum would cancel and they could be hauled around safely. Assuming the cases were strong enough not to crush each other.

    1. Re:Not for use in a laptop? by HiQ · · Score: 1, Funny

      That's not all...they had to use sticky bits to store data on the disk. The plates were spinning so fast, the bits were flying around in the first stages of development

    2. Re:Not for use in a laptop? by GlassUser · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I usually appreciate your insight, but this is not one of your better trolls. Mylar is so light it's used to make solar sails, but so flimsy they have to deploy it in space, becase gravity will tear it. I don't think you'll be able to spin the disc ("platter"?) fast enough to gain significant rotational inertia.

    3. Re:Not for use in a laptop? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i guess we can now see why you call yourself the PhysicsGenius...

    4. Re:Not for use in a laptop? by insensitive_clod · · Score: 2, Informative

      Picking nits here, i know, but rotational inertia is a property of the object (I=(MR^2)/2 i think,) Angular momentum depends on the rotational speed, (L=I*omega) not the moment of inertia itself.

    5. Re:Not for use in a laptop? by Sargent1 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Rotational intertia (or, as I've always heard it called, the moment of inertia) is indeed a property of the object, just like mass is a property of an object. Its value depends on how the mass is arranged, though -- a solid disk and a hoop which both have the same mass and radius don't have the same moment of inertia.

      You're right that angular momentum depends on rotational speed (omega), but it also depends on the moment of inertia. That's the I in your formula.

      Nevertheless, as another poster pointed out, the mylar disc is small (moment of inertia goes up as you put more mass further away from the rotational center) and lightweight, so angular momentum effects will undoubtedly be tiny.

  5. StorReader by SnAzBaZ · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Calling the drive a StorReader when it both reads and writes is a bit misleading.

    Does anyone know what kind of speeds these things can achieve?

    I wonder how durable/reliable they are. These could really take off, especially as the price is so reasonable.

    1. Re:StorReader by batemanm · · Score: 5, Informative

      According to the storcard website these cards have a datarate of 5Mbytes/sec the rotational speed is 3600 rpm and the average access time is 15 msec. All taken from the overview of the StorCard from the campany website.

    2. Re:StorReader by Genom · · Score: 1

      So...with a datarate of 5Mb/sec, and a capacity of 5000Mb (industry Gb = 1000Mb...bleh), you're looking at 1000 sec (16 min, 40 sec) to "fill" one.

      Reminds me of the "old days" of Zip drives that took 10-12 minutes to fill. Set it to copy, go to lunch.

      Sounds about perfect for use in an mp3/ogg player (1-2 sec to load any given track into memory).

    3. Re:StorReader by glsunder · · Score: 1

      According to their tech page on their web site, "Data can be transferred from the card to the reader and delivered to the host or client at 5MB per second with the 100MB product, and will scale with higher-capacity designs."

      Also, a little further down, they mention "the StorReader supports a sustained data transfer rate of 5 megabytes per second in the 100 megabyte StorCard, and scales in the 5 gigabyte design."

      So it sounds like it's 5MB/s, not 5Mb/s.

    4. Re:StorReader by glsunder · · Score: 1

      I guess I need another cup of coffee. I could have sworn the parent said 5Mb not 5MB.

  6. It's about time by Znonymous+Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's about time that large amounts of affordable portable storage becomes available. $69 for a 128MB UBS key chain was just too much.

    --

    Karma: The shiznight, mostly because I am the Drizzle.

    1. Re:It's about time by jimhill · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Not necessarily true now, either. The article says that media will be available from 100MB up to 5GB. Any takers that it's the 100MB card that sells for $15 with the 5GB "model" going for several hundred?

      --
      Learn to spell: nickel, missile, lose, solely, amendment, speech, kernel, probably, ridiculous, deity, hierarchy, versus
    2. Re:It's about time by karnal · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not necessarily a better solution, but you could buy:

      1 USB CF reader (~20$)
      1 512mb CF card (~140$)

      Of course, it doesn't have the same form factor as the USB keychain, but you would have data portability... and you could buy extra cards for more storage.

      Of course, it's still more expensive than a CD-R.....

      --
      Karnal
    3. Re:It's about time by robosmurf · · Score: 1
      I do now use compact flash as a floppy disk replacement.

      With USB readers and PC card adapters being cheap and highly compatible, CF cards are pretty easy to read on most PCs.

      CF cards are also much smaller than CDs and floppy disks, and can be used for data transfer with many PDAs and digital cameras.

      They are still rather expensive for the storage you get, but can be worth it for the convenience.

    4. Re:It's about time by phelddagrif · · Score: 1

      Well I hope, that the smaller sizes would be cheaper and have faster transfer speeds. Because what other advantages does it have over CF or any other removable storage. Even zip disks are more economical at the 100MB range.

    5. Re:It's about time by Junks+Jerzey · · Score: 1

      Of course, it's still more expensive than a CD-R.....

      True, but am I the only person bothered by having stacks of old CD-Rs that I don't know what to do with? It sure would be nice to have something a little less wasteful.

    6. Re:It's about time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well then, let me tell you all about the fancy new invention call..... CD-RW!!!

  7. uh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    iPod 2 anyone?

  8. Huh? by Keebler71 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    What exactly will become of the HD?

    --
    "It takes considerable knowledge just to realize the extent of your own ignorance." - Thomas Sowell
  9. Re:Credit Card sized 5GB HD to become late this ye by gimpboy · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    hell i thought the hd was trying to become pregnant. perhaps it was having fertiltiy problems, but i personally think 5gb is too young for a hd to have children.

    --
    -- john
  10. Big enough for DVD by ultrabot · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Aren't they about the right size for containing a movie with pretty decent picture quality? One could imagine using these in preference over DVD-RW, provided that set top boxes that can read these become available. At least they are not too "encumbered", unlike DVD's.

    --
    Save your wrists today - switch to Dvorak
    1. Re:Big enough for DVD by chris09876 · · Score: 1

      It would be much more convenient to have a bunch of credit-card sized movies instead of DVDs lying around... I'd assume they would also be more durable.

    2. Re:Big enough for DVD by Quaryon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I can't find anything to say how fast these drives are, and whether they could sustain the speed of transfer necessary for a DVD movie.

      Also, the article says they start at 100Mb and go up to "as much as" 5Gb, so that price of $15 may just be for the 100Mb version, at which point it doesn't sound quite so attractive.

      Q.

    3. Re:Big enough for DVD by Angry+White+Guy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That all depends on access times.

      You could just use it for storage of the movie, and copy it to your HDD, then play it from there, but that all remains to be seen.

      --
      You think that I'm crazy, you should see this guy!
    4. Re:Big enough for DVD by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      The fundamental difference between these media is that this thing's data is fully volatile, and can be overwritten. Even DVD-RWs can only be rewritten several times, as I understand it. It's only partially volatile. These things have much greater potential as they're designed to be fully volatile.

    5. Re:Big enough for DVD by Quaryon · · Score: 4, Informative

      This site mentions a 5Mb/s transfer rate which I guess would be more than enough for DVD movies.

      However, it says that this figure is for the 100Mb version and that it "scales" to the 5Gb version. What does that mean, I wonder? It will be 50 times faster for the 5Gb version? I don't think so, somehow - 50 times slower? That might be pushing it for DVD usage at 100Mb/sec..

      Q.

    6. Re:Big enough for DVD by forgoil · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Considering how often I break cards, well, I hope they will be more durable.

    7. Re:Big enough for DVD by UncleAlias · · Score: 2, Funny

      Can you say "Movie iPod?"...

      Of course, then comes the issue of watching decent-quality movies on a post-stamp-sized screen.

      Probably won't come with 5.1 either...

      --

      Stéphane "Alias" Gallay
      Now, where did I put this witty quote?..

    8. Re:Big enough for DVD by karnal · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Actually, doesn't the DVD spec top out at 10mbits/sec?

      If they're referencing a 5mbit/sec transfer rate (minimum, mind you), then the media would have no problem sustaining a divx transfer, but would probably puke on most (if not all) DVD-spec'd files.

      --
      Karnal
    9. Re:Big enough for DVD by Quaryon · · Score: 1

      Actually the spec says "5MB" which I took to mean 5MByte, not 5Mbit, which would be plenty for a DVD. But yes, if it's 5Mbit that's not so good..

      My fault for mis-quoting a small "b" :)

      Q.

    10. Re:Big enough for DVD by tbspit · · Score: 1

      The site says that the transfer rate is 5MB per second. 5MB is 5 megabytes is 40 megabits. So it is 40 megabits per second.

    11. Re:Big enough for DVD by jovlinger · · Score: 1

      while it would be easy to go on the web to find out, let's apply some math to the problem.

      10Mb/s = 600 Mb/m = 75 MB/m

      So if you want to encode an 100 minute movie on one disk (fair assumption) that disk would need to hold 7.5 GB.

      I personally don't recall the storage capacity of a DVD, but I thought it was lower than that, on the order of 5 GB.

    12. Re:Big enough for DVD by mcoko · · Score: 0

      The capacity of a single layer single sided DVD is approx. 4.5GB. A dual layer disk (you know if it is because when watching movie there is a slight pause as the laser changes layers) is approx. 9GB. A Dual layer Dual Sided disk is approx. 18GB. BLue Laser is the future and can store alot more.

      5.1 Surround Sound takes up a lot of space on the DVD. If you use regular 2.0 surround and maybe a little lower bit rate on the video you should have no problem fit on a 5BG Card.

      A lot of movies are on Single Layered Single Sided Disks. Check the cheap DVDs that have Standard and Widescreen versions, one on each side. They are most likely Single Layered, Dual Sided. Dual, Dual are very rare (to my knowledge). So if a movie can fit on a 4.5GB DVD it probably can fit on a 5GB Card. But again Bit rate/transfer rate can cause a problem.

      Correct me if I am wrong. Thanks

      --
      www.fotoforay.com
    13. Re:Big enough for DVD by Digypro · · Score: 1

      Why do you need a postage stamp size screen, if you could use these instead.

    14. Re:Big enough for DVD by constantnormal · · Score: 1

      Sounds plenty attractive to me. Consider that flash memory for digital cameras is running around $80 for 128M. You just have to select the application that makes the most sense, cost-wise. Surely these will knock the prices of iPods down a notch or two.

      The pricing for DVD media is starting to fall pretty rapidly, so these may not make much of a dent in the DVD arena.

    15. Re:Big enough for DVD by Quaryon · · Score: 1

      A credit card is a lot larger than a flash card though.. Imagine your camera with an additional credit-card-sized reader on it - mine would certainly be significantly bigger than it is.

      I don't think it's going to compete too well with flash-based solutions since it's just too big. It's more likely to be (as other people have pointed out) a new, bigger replacement for floppy and zip drives.

      iPods currently go up to 20Gb I believe - if a 100Mb one of these new cards is around the $10-$15 mark, then a 5Gb one is going to be around $500, and that's just using a linear scale which these things never do. Note, the article does not say $15 for 5Gb!

      So I don't think this is going to compete with iPod/Archos style MP3 players in a hurry.

      Q.

    16. Re:Big enough for DVD by Max+von+H. · · Score: 3, Informative
      I personally don't recall the storage capacity of a DVD, but I thought it was lower than that, on the order of 5 GB

      You're wrong. Well, you're right if you're talking about DVD-R which has a maximum capacity of 4.7GB but pressed DVDs can contain a LOT more (up to 17GB), considering they can be multilayered and double-sided whereas DVD-Rs are only SL/SS (Single Side/Single Layer).

      Here's a table representing the various combinations and respective capacities (googled the info from this page):

      DVD-5 (SS/SL): 4.38 gig (4.7G) of data, over 2 hours of video

      DVD-9 (SS/DL): 7.95 gig (8.5G), about 4 hours of video

      DVD-10 (DS/SL): 8.75 gig (9.4G), about 4.5 hours of video

      DVD-14 (DS/ML): 12.33 gig (13.24G), about 6.5 hours of video

      DVD-18 (DS/DL): 15.90 gig (17G), over 8 hours of video

      DVD-RAM (SS/SL): 2.40 gig (2.58G)

      DVD-RAM (DS/SL): 4.80 gig (5.16G)

      As you can see, we'll have to wait a bit more for a solid-state competitor to the DVD...

      Cheers,
      max

      --
      -- It's always darker before it goes pitch black.
    17. Re:Big enough for DVD by Coward,+Anonymous · · Score: 2, Interesting

      DVDs can use VBR. 9.8Mb/s is the maximum rate for video/audio/subpictures but the average rate can be and usually is much lower. Recordable DVDs are 4,700,000,000 bytes though most current DVD videos are up to twice that (dual layer), but it's generally possible to reduce the size of a dual layer dvd to fit on a single dvd-5 without noticeably affecting video quality.

    18. Re:Big enough for DVD by default+luser · · Score: 1

      Your rough math is a good attempt, but you've got some errors.

      First of all, most production DVDs these days are single-sided, dual-layer, giving you a maximum capacity over 9GB. This is why most DVD-R makers are comfortable that you are not going to pirate movies in their original format, since very few recordable formats support dual-layer or dual-side recording.

      Second of all, many movies are encoded at much less than 10Mb data rate. I've rarely seen a DVD that tops 9Mb/s. Most of the industry has no qualms about playing with this data rate to fit their movie on the desired medium, even at the cost of quality.

      Case in point: my copy of Barry Lyndon ( part of my Kubrick Collection ) is terrible quality. Obviously, their answer for a 3+ hour movie was to use a crappy bitrate rather than use DVD-18 ( Double-sided, dual-layered ) or two dual-layered discs.

      --

      Man is the animal that laughs.
      And occasionally whores for Karma.

    19. Re:Big enough for DVD by undercanopy · · Score: 1

      You could just use it for storage of the movie, and copy it to your HDD, then play it from there, but that all remains to be seen.

      If it's not fast enough to play DVD video (ie: can't read ~4 gig in ~2 hours), imagine how long ahead you'd have to plan on watching that movie to allow time to copy -- start the copy at lunch so you can watch the movie after dinner? No thanks.

      --
      -- D-23994, Muff#2613
    20. Re:Big enough for DVD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Consider that flash memory for digital cameras is running around $80 for 128M.

      You're off by a factor of 2. It's easy to find 128MB CompactFlash cards for $40.

    21. Re:Big enough for DVD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm, read your topic heading. It says BIG ENOUGH for DVD, I fail to see where it says FAST ENOUGH to meed DVD transfer specs. *BZZZt* try again.

    22. Re:Big enough for DVD by spike+hay · · Score: 1

      Actually, as this would be totally incompatible with DVD players and drives, there would be no concievable reason to abide by the DVD standard. Why not just encode the movies in divx? It doesn't make sense to use the outdated mpeg-2 standard found in DVDs when this is being used with a computer.

      --
      If you don't understand any of my sayings, come to me in private and I shall take you in my German mouth.
  11. At long last! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    I suspect that Duke Nukem Forever will be released using this new media.

  12. Coming Not So Soon by DASHSL0T · · Score: 4, Funny

    Cmdr Taco's grammar checker to become late 2007, at the earliest.

    --
    Freedom Is Universal
    Linux-Universe
    1. Re:Coming Not So Soon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      grammar checker to become

      Ths chequer you moronie

  13. Yeah but, by valisk · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    When you have sat on your wallet and broke your card it's gonna be a real bith for the store clerk to type in all your information.

    --

    Economic Left/Right: -0.62
    Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -3.69
  14. Re:Credit Card sized 5GB HD to become late this ye by Atrahasis · · Score: 1
    Yeah, what the title actually says is:

    Release of 5GB HDD to be delayed.

  15. Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    If they already know it's going to become late why don't they just push back the release date?

  16. Old Commercial, New Twist by slide-rule · · Score: 5, Funny

    Trip to the ballpark with teenage son: $25.
    Trip to computer store for card reader: $100.
    Trip to radio shack for odds-n-ends: $30.
    Look on son's face when he cracks into the secret pr0n cache on your new credit card: Priceless.

    1. Re:Old Commercial, New Twist by Cheeze · · Score: 2

      off topic, but for a real good time, call 127.0.0.1:79

      --
      Why read the article when I can just make up a snap judgement?
    2. Re:Old Commercial, New Twist by AftanGustur · · Score: 1


      Also offtopic ..

      Wampires, stay out of 127.0.0.1:13
      For lost-and-found, go to 127.0.0.1:39
      Lost some stuff ? Go talk to the girl at 127.0.0.1:10080

      --
      echo '[q]sa[ln0=aln80~Psnlbx]16isb572CCB9AE9DB03273snlbxq' |dc
    3. Re:Old Commercial, New Twist by JoshRoss · · Score: 1

      And for a good man look in 127.0.0.1:9535

    4. Re:Old Commercial, New Twist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      off topic, but for a real good time, call 127.0.0.1:79


      YUO IS TEH FUNNIAR MASTAR!!! I GET IT!!! 127.0.0.1 IS LOCAL HOST!!! ALL OF THOSE IPS AND PORTS GO BACK TO YOU!!! YOU SHOULD BE A COMEDIAN!

  17. Cool but Scary by GabrielF · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Cool, but it scares me a little. At $15 a card, how much of our personal information will we be forced to carry around in our pockets? Take for example a national ID based on this card, it would have enough memory to store your medical information, financial information, school information, etc... Reminds me of Gattaca

    1. Re:Cool but Scary by October_30th · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Take for example a national ID based on this card, it would have enough memory to store your medical information, financial information, school information, etc...

      I already have my national ID card with me at all times (euro driver's license in a wallet) and yes, a cop has the right to request that I identify myself with it. If I refuse and they have a probable cause they can drag me to the station for identification. So what? Complaining about a national ID is just a lot of hot air about how the sky is falling.

      I sure would like to have all my medical, financial and school information in my pocket at all times too. You could go to any doctor and get a prescription without having to carry your dead-tree medical history file to prove that you do have this and that chronic problem. In fact, to solve this problem they are already planning a national health database to which every doctor has an access. IMHO, this is only a good thing. Having your school information and financial with you should help with job interviews (they can download your certified school and job history on site) and banking (credit ratings on the card).

      --
      The owls are not what they seem
    2. Re:Cool but Scary by gazbo · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I should've known some retard would start yakking about privacy. Jesus, if the government mandated you carried a single card (not even smartcard) that had a barcode, they could look up your data on a central DB and get gigabytes of data about you. But they don't.

      Now you're given a system for transporting porn and mp3s, and suddenly you think that the government is going to say "to hell with a centralised database, we'll make everyone carry their own data. Hope nobody breaks it."

      Hey, I hear that tinfoil hats protect you from harmful gases - try wearing yours then sticking your head in a gas-oven for an hour - it really works!

    3. Re:Cool but Scary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I'm not scared. I have a large magnet.

    4. Re:Cool but Scary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a movement in the medical industry to allow/enable patients to electronically possess there medical records, test results, etc... Currently, asking for a copy of your xrays, test results is going to cost you, per page, $15. One of the many products geared toward this is remarketed by TDK, which allows radiologists to give out copies of exams on cd. CD's are preferred because they are only $0.30 a piece. These $15 drives will not be used because of the cost associated with them. However, like every other "portable medium" it will have its niche market amoung neophyte computer users. Whereas you or I would take whatever data we needed to transport and simpy scp/ftp/fxp it home during the day; while we were at work anyway, this product makes little to no sense. I guess its large storage capacity could present some applications where the amount of bandwidth wasn't available, and you were moving around iso's. Even still, DVD writers are getting cheaper by the day.

      I wonder if iomega will buy it and call it MonsterZipDisk.

      ac

    5. Re:Cool but Scary by carlos_benj · · Score: 1

      ....a cop has the right to request that I identify myself with it. If I refuse and they have a probable cause they can drag me to the station for identification.

      I thought station identification was something only television and radio were forced to do....

      --

      --

      As a matter of fact, I am a lawyer. But I play an actor on TV.

    6. Re:Cool but Scary by Ashran · · Score: 1, Troll

      To parent of parent:
      NO! DONT do that! That will kill you! Tinfoil hats protect you from mind reading devices and microwaves.
      Mod your microwave - it needs to operate with an open door for this experiment to work.
      Put on your your tinfoil hat and switch on your microwave (with open door - that the important part) and watch the pretty sparks!
      Doing this 3 times a week makes you permanently immune to mind-reading-devices.

      To parent:
      Dont kill him (infertility is enough :)! Let him spread word about the mind-reading-device-protection to his 'anon tinfoil hat users' group :)

      If this post doesnt make sense - try reading it backwards!

      --

      Before you email me, remember: "There is no god!"
    7. Re:Cool but Scary by C0LDFusion · · Score: 2, Offtopic

      This is once again why Europeans shouldn't get involved in privacy issues in the US. Of course you have a "national ID", because your countries might have counties or provinces, but when you go to any other country in Europe, and they ask where you are from, you'll probably say you're from whatever country from which you hail.

      On the other hand, if I travel to Canada from the US, and someone asks where I from, I tell them which state I am from.

      Why is this? Because people from the US, for the most part, identify their origin by their state. It's something steeped in American tradition from when we were under the Articles of Confederation and had an extremely weak federal government uniting the otherwise independent states.

      Now, why is this important for the sake of the "National ID card" debate? Because, most of us, because we identify ourselves by states, fear even further encroachment of the federal government on what is currently the responsibility of the state.

      I know, it's hard to understand, but since we have a large country, we generally don't feel the need of an excessively large bureaucratic federal government in charge of all aspects of our lives, and in the case of smaller states, totally unresponsive to their needs.

      --
      Only in slashdot are posts of solidarity modded at -1 Redundant, while posts of antagonism are modded as -1 Flamebait.
    8. Re:Cool but Scary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, excuse me. Speak for yourself.

      I refer to my state to describe where I live because people are liekly to know where there state is, and not where smallville citty is. It conveys a general geographic area that is likely to be known. Whereas people from major cities tend to identify themselves by the city rather than that state because the geographic location of the city is likely to be known to their audience.

      I tend to think most of us use states to refer to where we are from for that reason. You however, come across as some southerner who's sore about them damn federalists mucking around with the "South's' states rights. You lost the war. Get over it.

    9. Re:Cool but Scary by guacamolefoo · · Score: 1

      You however, come across as some southerner who's sore about them damn federalists mucking around with the "South's' states rights.

      Or maybe one of the current Supreme Court justices that is trying to roll back the excesses of federal power exerted under the Commerce Clause. See Wickard v. Fillburn for an extreme example of the Commerce Clause in action.

      GF.

    10. Re:Cool but Scary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if I travel to Canada from the US, and someone asks where I from, I tell them which state I am from.

      Why is this? Because people from the US, for the most part, identify their origin by their state. It's something steeped in American tradition


      No, it's because the United States is the political equivalent of the European Union. The US federation is a bit tighter than the EU, but each of the states-Connecticut, Wisconsin, Germany, France--voted to join the union. Of course, the last time one tried to leave the union, it raised a bit of a fuss...

    11. Re:Cool but Scary by joshsisk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I sure would like to have all my medical, financial and school information in my pocket at all times too.

      Don't you think it'd be safer to have that stuff stored on a database that could be remotely accessed, then on a card that you are carrying? Gives a whole new meaning to "identity theft".

      Sure, the cards would be encrypted, but if people regulary were carrying around cards that detailed all of their financial information (mutual funds, bank accounts, etc), I bet a black market industry that involved cracking the cards would spring up.

    12. Re:Cool but Scary by Planesdragon · · Score: 0

      Why is this? Because people from the US, for the most part, identify their origin by their state. It's something steeped in American tradition from when we were under the Articles of Confederation and had an extremely weak federal government uniting the otherwise independent states.

      No, not really. It's because we're so friggin' huge.

      If Russia was divided up into fifty provinces that had about equal population, you can be sure that they'd refer to themselves by province.

      Canada's not a good example of a "foreign country", anyway. If you wanted an example of how USA citizens refer to themselves in a foreign country, try Great Britain or a country with a foreign language.

      Now, why is this important for the sake of the "National ID card" debate? Because, most of us, because we identify ourselves by states, fear even further encroachment of the federal government on what is currently the responsibility of the state.

      Hardly. We just have paranoid privacy zealots who fear making government efficient.

      Technically, we don't have _any_ government ID card, and so we use the state driver's license in its place. ;)

    13. Re:Cool but Scary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I did all this but I think you meant that I should turn the gas on.

    14. Re:Cool but Scary by jasonditz · · Score: 1

      Here in America we somehow got the crazy idea that you don't need a driver's license unless you actually drive.

      Its crazy I know, but when I was riding in the back seat and I told the cop he didn't need to see my driver's license because I wasn't driving, he pulled his gun on me.

    15. Re:Cool but Scary by Scaebor · · Score: 1

      The problem with this approach is that the technology does not seem to be well suited to the punishing demands on durability and long-term use that credit cards and other wallet-dwellers are subject to.

      "The card actually has moveable parts inside its thin shell," says Bill Heil, vice president of StorCard.

      The presence of moving parts almost ensures that the drive will wear out after a time, especially considering the beating taken by being sat on repeatedly in a wallet over several years' time

      --
      "Hey brother Christian with your high and mighty errand / your actions speak so loud I can't hear a word you're saying"
    16. Re:Cool but Scary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is once again why Europeans shouldn't get involved in privacy issues in the US.
      But the USians should get involved in whatever they like? Face it - if you don't like us to get involved in how things are at your end of the pond, then you should stay out of how we handle stuff.

    17. Re:Cool but Scary by C0LDFusion · · Score: 1

      You however, come across as some southerner who's sore about them damn federalists mucking around with the "South's' states rights. You lost the war. Get over it.

      Congrats on successfully locating my place of birth! I was born in Georgia, however, as a child of a military family, I was not raised there. You get bonus points if you can locate where I was raised. (Hint: Not in the south).

      Extra bonus points if you STFU.

      --
      Only in slashdot are posts of solidarity modded at -1 Redundant, while posts of antagonism are modded as -1 Flamebait.
    18. Re:Cool but Scary by C0LDFusion · · Score: 1

      No, not really. It's because we're so friggin' huge.

      If Russia was divided up into fifty provinces that had about equal population, you can be sure that they'd refer to themselves by province.


      Thanks for restating one of my earlier points.

      Hardly. We just have paranoid privacy zealots who fear making government efficient.

      Well, sure, but Nazi Germany's government was VERY efficient. Shit, they built the Autobahn in less than 10 years.

      --
      Only in slashdot are posts of solidarity modded at -1 Redundant, while posts of antagonism are modded as -1 Flamebait.
    19. Re:Cool but Scary by dubious9 · · Score: 1

      Chirst man, every heard on Social security number? We all already have a national id. It's just not on a piece of plastic with our picture on it.
      And gigabytes? Surely an exageration.
      What the heck are you so afraid of?

      --
      Why, o why must the sky fall when I've learned to fly?
    20. Re:Cool but Scary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live in NY. Apparently they have a seat belt law that states you can be given a ticket if you are sitting in the passengar seat without a seatbelt if you are over a certain age. This is assuming that everyone has a license, and always carries it around. When I asked the person who was telling me this (instructor for a driving course) what happens if you don't have you license, do you have to give them your social security number or what, he immediatly said "yes, of course!" Wtf is that?

    21. Re:Cool but Scary by be-fan · · Score: 2, Funny

      Translation into English:

      "My government is fucking me up the ass, and by god, it feels good!"

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    22. Re:Cool but Scary by jasonditz · · Score: 1

      Here in MI we've got the same deal.

      I'm 100% positive you don't have to give them your soc # for it, but I'm sure you have to give them your name and addy. I don't see why you couldn't just lie though.

      Be careful, if you have a driver's license on you they might search you and then shoot you if you've got it and said you didn't.

    23. Re:Cool but Scary by Blue+Stone · · Score: 1

      ... and think of the great benefits to the thief who nicks your wallet!
      ID cards are a truly wonderful thing.

      --
      Corporation, n. An ingenious device for obtaining individual profit without individual responsibility. - Ambrose Bierce
    24. Re:Cool but Scary by gazbo · · Score: 1
      I can't tell if you're talking to me or the person whom I was replying to. The social security number was exactly what I was implying, however I suggested a barcode for easy scannability. As for gigabytes of data, I was just making the point that if the government wanted to, they could store an arbitrary amount of data in a centralised database rather than farming it out to the client, ripe for tampering.

      In short, I agree with you entirely.

    25. Re:Cool but Scary by C0LDFusion · · Score: 1

      But the USians should get involved in whatever they like? Face it - if you don't like us to get involved in how things are at your end of the pond, then you should stay out of how we handle stuff.

      Last time I checked, I didn't jump into European affairs and say that you guys are paranoid because you don't want an EU-wide version of the DMCA. I might express my outrage at the legislation, but I don't accuse people of being anything negative if they don't want their rights infringed upon.

      BTW, the last time we decided to ignore the happenings in Europe, a guy with a bad haircut and mustache was killing Jews and rolling over Europe like it was a playground. I dunno, which is worse...? Our interest, or our isolationism?

      --
      Only in slashdot are posts of solidarity modded at -1 Redundant, while posts of antagonism are modded as -1 Flamebait.
    26. Re:Cool but Scary by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

      Well, sure, but Nazi Germany's government was VERY efficient. Shit, they built the Autobahn in less than 10 years.

      Yep. And if they weren't genocidal, irrational, and bent on the destruction of everyone else, they'd still be around and maybe even be our "most favored nation" right now.

      The evils of the Nazis were great, but "efficency" wasn't one of them.

    27. Re:Cool but Scary by C0LDFusion · · Score: 1

      The point is that any government that has the power to control lives in nasty ways is, of course going to be efficient. I mean, Our government would get alot of stuff done, if we had one leader and he didn't have to worry about "that pesky constitution" every time he wanted to put a hippy on death row for advocating communism.

      --
      Only in slashdot are posts of solidarity modded at -1 Redundant, while posts of antagonism are modded as -1 Flamebait.
  18. cheap media, expensive reader by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Its amazing that they are able to fit that data density and functionality (realtime encryption/decryption of data) into something the size of a credit card for 'under $15', but the reader is about $100.

    I wonder if they could fit their technology into a Compact Flash I/II format - it would give IBM's micro drives a run for their money.

    1. Re:cheap media, expensive reader by cap'n+foolsy · · Score: 1

      not to mention give us a safe place to store all our pr0n.

      oh no, i just revealed that i have only 5 GB of pr0n! don't spit on me, please!

      --
      It might look like I'm standing motionless, but I'm actively waiting for my problems to go away
    2. Re:cheap media, expensive reader by matrix29 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Its amazing that they are able to fit that data density and functionality (realtime encryption/decryption of data) into something the size of a credit card for 'under $15', but the reader is about $100.

      I wonder if they could fit their technology into a Compact Flash I/II format - it would give IBM's micro drives a run for their money.


      If it actually can stream data as fast as a DVD then it could give the single-sided / single-layer DVD format a fun for its money. Hell, except for the problems of crushing or demagnetizing the card, this is a pretty choice format for transferring fragile DVDs into a durable format for children (waterproof, rewritable, harder to scratch) to use and to leave the parent's expensive DVD collection alone. That is one of the reasons children's shows are preferred to be on cheap videotape over fragile DVDs. If the kid destroys the videotape then it won't be too pricey to replace it. The other option is to up the data density and deliver a pocket-sized format perfect for people on the go and traveling. The one key thing for the content providers to remember is LEAVE THE DAMN FORMAT OPEN AND EASY TO COPY. If parents cannot copy their expensive DVDs for the kiddies to watch on car trips to these MEDIA CARDS (yes you can use this name - I yield all rights to this title in exchange for a non-stupid RIAA with foresight) then the format faces consumers looking at the requirement to RE-BUY the media they already own on the previous DVD format just to enjoy the perks of the new format.

      --
      "Face it, a nation that maintains a 72% approval rating on George W. Bush is a nation with a very loose grip on reality.
    3. Re:cheap media, expensive reader by Junks+Jerzey · · Score: 1

      Its amazing that they are able to fit that data density and functionality (realtime encryption/decryption of data) into something the size of a credit card for 'under $15', but the reader is about $100.

      You have an odd definition of expensive, considering that you need a PC to even use the reader. $100 is the price of a video card or a Zip drive or two recently released games or a few months of broadband access. $100 is low enough in the computer world to become ubiquitous very quickly.

      If you want expensive, look at the 3GHz Pentium 4 or a the latest Radeon.

  19. Hmph. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    A Credit Card sized 5GB HD is never late, Hemos Baggins.

    It arrives on the market precisely when it means to!

  20. Pipe dream by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    This sounds like another magic storage device...like the quarter sized one that would only cost 5 bucks for 200megs or whatever.

    The article said it had the bandwidth to handle video streaming...I'll believe it when I see it.

    But I have to admit...it would be nice

    1. Re:Pipe dream by gus2000 · · Score: 1

      That is the truth...remember the HUGE buzz on slashdot (running at a couple of articles a week for a while) about Dataplay? It was and is all vapour, just like this announcement.

    2. Re:Pipe dream by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was and is all vapour

      DataPlay disks and a mp3 player is available at my local Circuit City. The disk are cheap enough (don't remember the price but didn't find them unreasonable) but the player was like $160 or so... not worth it where there are so many others that can use SM or CF for memory.

    3. Re:Pipe dream by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Weirdly enough I was at Circuit City last night and saw those things for the first time...and my first thought was, "God these things would be so EASY to drop/lose/misplace." How the hell would you label them nicely either?

      Personally I think the MiniDisc got the size right. Small enough to go anywhere, yet large enough you don't have to worry about losing them and enough flat space on the label for decent marking of the contents. Now if only Sony would loosen their anal retentive grip on getting data into and out of the things they'd do much better than they are.

      Oh well I can wish can't I?

  21. The Truth is elsewhere by tewfik · · Score: 1

    for me this is a typical 'I want to believe' case. Especially as far as the annouced retail prices are concerned.

    --
    -- Or So Tewfik Wrote. --
  22. Write Once Read Never by tigress · · Score: 1

    CD-writer? Video-recorder? First-poster? =)

  23. So let me get this straight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This thing is a 5G, credit-card sized floppy?

    My BS-o-meter is currently pegged reading this. I hope no one is holding off on getting that dvd-writer because of this vaporware.

    1. Re:So let me get this straight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But what's not to believe about it? Especially coming from the reputable, and highly computer-savvay people at PCWorld, who brought you such headlines as "Can a Human Being Fit on an IPod?"

  24. Re:Credit Card sized 5GB HD to become late this ye by IPFreely · · Score: 3, Funny
    "Please come with me, or you will become late.

    "Late? Late for what?"

    "Oh me, I never was very good at threats. Come with me or you will become late, as in 'The late Dent Arther Dent'."

    Maybe they are planning to kill off the technology.

    --
    There is nothing so silly as other peoples traditions, and nothing so sacred as our own.
  25. Cute little CmdrTaco... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Trying to coin a new phrase ... "All your base are to become late"

  26. finally! large capacity for mp3 portables by ozzy_cow · · Score: 1

    finally its here! i want an mp3 portable with one of these.

    altough im kinda skeptical if we will actually see it happen. remember those quarter sized 300mb disks that were supposed to be a big hit last year? put all kinds of restriction on them and tried to sell drm music on it. no wonder noone bought it

    1. Re:finally! large capacity for mp3 portables by yatest5 · · Score: 1

      ahh but it's a hard disk so is it suitable as an mp3 player storage i.e. can you shake it all about - one thinks not....

      --
      • Mod parent up! [a] by Anonymous Coward (Score:5) Thurs, June 31, @13:37
    2. Re:finally! large capacity for mp3 portables by Fulkkari · · Score: 1

      finally! large capacity for mp3 portables

      So. Were have you been living for the last year or two? Ever heard of the iPod (5 GB, 10 GB and 20 GB models)?

      --
      I demand the Cone of Silence!
    3. Re:finally! large capacity for mp3 portables by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Riaa will just want a levy on the media.

  27. Compact flash anyone? by MrMickS · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The real driving force for small, portable, removable media is not the computer industry but the photographic one. Do I care if I can carry around a credit card sized disk if all I can use it in is a computer? Compact flash storage prices are coming down and capacities are going up. How long will it be before they reach the multiple GB mark?

    I don't see this as being a major player unless it gets adopted my a photo manufacturer. That's only going to happen if they can demonstrate write speeds to match solid state devices.

    --
    You may think me a tired, old, cynic. I'd have to disagree about the tired bit.
    1. Re:Compact flash anyone? by Fweeky · · Score: 1
      Compact flash storage prices are coming down and capacities are going up. How long will it be before they reach the multiple GB mark?

      Already there (nearly): "Pretec 3GB Compact Flash Card Available for pre-order", although given the 1GB eXpansys is nearly $500 I'm not sure how practical they'll be for most users :)

      I wonder how well CF deals with defects.. would suck to have half of your 3GB of award winning photography lost because one of the [n] billion components have failed. Do they have HD-alike sector remapping or so?
    2. Re:Compact flash anyone? by afidel · · Score: 1

      Not sure about actual implementation, but since the controller is one the card it would not be hard to do defect detection and avoidance with spare cells. As for the durability of CF, look at the pictures from the one photographer from the WTC disaster, the south tower fell on him, almost completely destroying the camera, but all of the photographs in flash survived. I don't think you would be likely to kill all of your pictures without a large static discharge somehow hitting the contacts (difficult with cf due to the recessed pins).

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  28. yet another format by jas79 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How many drive does a computer user need to read every type of disk currently avaible on the market?

    There are just to many. what good is a disk if you cannot exchange it with your classmates or collegue's.

    1. Re:yet another format by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's "too," not "to." It's intended to mean "excessive."

      And don't put apostrophes at the end of words you wish to make plural. The word "colleagues" works just fine without an apostrophe.

    2. Re:yet another format by Ben+Hutchings · · Score: 1

      You can get a multi-format reader quite cheaply, though. I saw one in a UK department store that handles CF, SD/MMC, MS and SM for only about £40. You can probably find them cheaper in computer stores.

  29. and the RIAA levy.... by Craig+Nagy · · Score: 5, Funny

    will raise the price to $200?

    Cause obviously this thing is going to hold my entire mp3 collection...I don't see any other use.

    1. Re:and the RIAA levy.... by phelddagrif · · Score: 1

      What else could you possibly use it for other than to steal every scrap of digital content available to your grubby thieving hands. Its not like you might want to have other personal data around so that you could be productive.

    2. Re:and the RIAA levy.... by Rary · · Score: 1
      and the RIAA levy.... will raise the price to $200?

      That's probably not too far off, actually. The proposed increase in the recording media levy that's currently being debated in Canada will set the levy at $21/GB for hard drives in devices like MP3 players. If a similar rate gets applied to something like this, that would up the cost of a 5GB card by an extra $105.

      Then the music industry will want to apply a levy to wallet sales, since wallets can be used to carry these illegal MP3-laden cards around.

      --

      "You cannot simultaneously prevent and prepare for war." -- Albert Einstein

  30. Encryption built in by Excarnate · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The article says

    Amazingly, within the card is an on-board processor containing integrated software controls that can encrypt data securely in real time.

    so I went looking and found the StorCard website. It says

    There are two types of cryptography logic; a PKI system providing authentication logic, and a block encryption algorithm, such as AES. The encryption keys for both the cryptography engines (supporting 1024 bit keys) are stored in local RAM, which is not accessible external to the card. All data on the StorCard's recording disk is encrypted and block encryption is done "on-the-fly".

    What I am less thrilled with is their emphasis on storing biometric data and trying to get what they see as a huge amount of money being spent on ID cards.

    --
    .signature: No such file or directory
    1. Re:Encryption built in by uradu · · Score: 1

      > What I am less thrilled with is their emphasis on storing biometric data and
      >trying to get what they see as a huge amount of money being spent on ID cards.

      Think of it another way: your wife (and I mean that in the most generic and non-exclusionary way possible) will need a court order to get a peek at your p0rn collection. Ain't that somethin'?

    2. Re:Encryption built in by Excarnate · · Score: 2, Funny

      What isn't clear to me is how and who will be able to access the information. Having strong encryption (seems to be optional, and it doesn't mention the expected hit on access speed) on the disc itself, while good, doesn't mean that the access is well protected. It could be as simple as putting the card in a machine, typing your password, and et voila, someone has your password. Or the gummint gets access built in. Or one is required to provide access or pay a penalty (legal or inability to access something desired).

      It will come down to careful implementation at all levels of usage including social, if the encryption is to mean anything useful to end users.

      You're right about the p0rn, though. This kind of thing would be great paired with a sort of eBook reader ;-)

      --
      .signature: No such file or directory
    3. Re:Encryption built in by uradu · · Score: 2, Funny

      > eBook reader

      Reader? Uh...sure. Oh, the articles!

  31. Great tech, crap name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With such good technology you`d have thought they could have come up with something a tad more inspiring than "StorCard".. its not even spelled right.

    1. Re:Great tech, crap name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A great name is self-describing. With "StorCard", we know its purpose (Storage) and its shape and size (Card). At two syllables, it's also easy to pronounce (think "Pepsi" and "Ajax").

    2. Re:Great tech, crap name by carlos_benj · · Score: 2, Funny

      A great name is self-describing. With "StorCard", we know its purpose (Storage) and its shape and size (Card). At two syllables, it's also easy to pronounce (think "Pepsi" and "Ajax").

      With Pepsi we know that it is brisk and full of energy (Pep) and a positive thing for Spanish speaking people (si) so it is a source of positive energy (or a positive source of energy?) for Spaniards and Mexicans.

      With Ajax we know that it is singular (A) and yet contains a plurality of small objects used in a child's game (jax) and is a wonderful way to consolidate scattered pieces into one cohesive unit. That's why moms love Ajax.

      --

      --

      As a matter of fact, I am a lawyer. But I play an actor on TV.

  32. Re:Yeah but, (RTAS) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    RTAS = Read The Article Silly

    I know reading is a drag ... but reading is also fundamental. Try it sometime. If you had, you would've read that:

    "Also, the card--like a credit card--is extremely flexible, without risking damage to the data it contains, he says."

  33. Pointless. by grub · · Score: 1


    Taco's ESL grammar aside, this sounds like another proprietary mass storage system with a cheap drive unit and disposable cartridges. Reminds me of "Give them the razor, sell them the blades". Remember Zip drives? Jaz drives? etc etc? Open standard CD and CDRs obliterated them.

    Thanks but no thanks. With a large hard drive in a laptop and a larger one in a server at home I don't see the need.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
  34. The NeXT iPod by krray · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'd love to have a iPod with a card reader (forget the internal hard drive) to go. Full? Want another "library"...

    Or how about just sliding a card into the dash of your car for tunes on the road? THIS could replace household CD players as we know them today...

    1. Re:The NeXT iPod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great, now I'll have to rip the white album again...

    2. Re:The NeXT iPod by be-fan · · Score: 1

      But then Apple would only have the super-duper-dying-battery to fall back on to make sure you have to buy another iPod next year. Too risky. What if the battery doesn't die as planned? Much safer to make the hard drive fixed as well.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
  35. For the scatterbrained by simon.b · · Score: 1

    you now have the unique oportunity not only to lose your credit card, but a whole digital identity.

    make backups of your cash card now!

  36. Moving parts by tantech · · Score: 1

    Since there are moving parts in the storage media, won't there be a bigger risk of damage to the media compared to Flash storage media? Wonder how long will each card's warranty be.

    1. Re:Moving parts by axxackall · · Score: 1
      So, what do you propose, Flash memory? That would be too expensive for having 5GB in 40 pieces these days (128M x $46 x 40pcs = $1,840/5GB).

      However, let's keep watching the Moore's law. If it will hold in ~7 years, than we'll get 5GB flash memory in one piece for the sime price, probably :)

      --

      Less is more !
  37. The Next Floppy? by dfn5 · · Score: 1

    This sounds like the next generation floppy. A spinning mylar disc? Sounds about as reliable as a floppy. Basically write twice, then dispose.

    --
    -- Thou hast strayed far from the path of the Avatar.
    1. Re:The Next Floppy? by David+Gould · · Score: 1


      This sounds like the next generation floppy. A spinning mylar disc? Sounds about as reliable as a floppy. Basically write twice, then dispose.

      Well, floppies aren't quite as bad as that, but, yes, from the description, this sounds like it should be called a "floppy disk", not a "hard disk drive".

      A removable media unit that contains just the disk, with all the mechanical works in the reader is called a "disk", not a "drive", because the actual drive is the reader. And if the disk is made out of mylar, it's called "floppy", not "hard".

      Still, this sounds pretty cool, especially if it really is "credit-card-sized", and not the way a PCMCIA card is credit-card-sized. That and the size-bump could qualify it as something more than just yet another "next standard floppy", but calling it an HD sounds like they're trying to ride the HD miniaturization wave precisely in order to avoid being thought of as a would-be next floppy.

      --
      David Gould
      main(i){putchar(340056100>>(i-1)*5&31|!!(i<6)<< 6)&&main(++i);}
  38. iPod by andyring · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So, this means that the iPod will either come down in price, or start using these cards. Imagine having an iPod that takes these 5 gig (and in the future, larger, I'd assume) drive cards. Boom, suddenly your iPod isn't limited to 5, 10 or 20 gigs! WooHoo! I can finally justify buying one.

    -Andy

    1. Re:iPod by cornjchob · · Score: 1

      not only that, due to just how thin this thing is (seems to me that you could fit two or three width-wise into a PC card or CompactFlash card), you could put several into an iPod--or anything else, for that matter--at once. A RAID 0 array of 5gig credit-card sized drives? Sounds good to me.

      --
      We now have confirmed reports from an informed Orange County minister that Ethel is still an active communist.
  39. Durability, and data backups...? by Sodakar · · Score: 5, Insightful

    At $15 per card, the price is definitely right, but I wonder if your data is safe... No, not in a data security point-of-view, but in simple mechanics and durability.

    It helps that the r/w head is not contained within the card itself, but I wonder how resistant it is to dust, flexing, and people simply sitting on it. Such cards are begging to be placed within a wallet, where guys like me will sit on them...

    Side note: With RSA's solid-state SecurID cards, I typically see about 1 out of every 15 get broken from what users perceive as "normal use". Interestingly enough, both men and women manage to break them from "accidentally crushing it" -- I had imagined that most of the broken cards would come from men putting it into their wallets and sitting in them, but it seems women put their cards in purses, and purses get stepped on and what-not quite often as well... (small sample (500) though, so here's your grain of salt to go with the data... :)

    Which brings up the issue of backing up the data... On a USB 2.0 bus, backing up 5GB's is not that bad, but on a USB 1.1 bus, a full backup would be quite painful... I suppose daily backups/synchronizations would help, but as you know, we humans love to procrastinate...

    1. Re:Durability, and data backups...? by sm0kes · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This is why RSA moved away from the credit card type design, and migrated to the "key fob". They are virtually indestructable (bout 1 in 500 has problems usually .... from my expierience).

      I can forsee these having the same short comings, 'to thin for their own good'. Despite having a nice metal shell, it won't stop the "normal" user from mangling.

    2. Re:Durability, and data backups...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The summary is deceiving. From reading the actual article, I think it will be $15 for 100MB cards (it's not clear when, if ever, 5GB cards will be made).

  40. Isn't this a FLOPPY ? by scrutty · · Score: 1

    Mylar suggests a floppy, rather than hard disk to me. 3.5" floppies are still floppies even though they are encased in a shell

    --
    -- Oh Well
    1. Re:Isn't this a FLOPPY ? by gylz · · Score: 5, Informative

      They have a very interesting white paper explaining how they`ve managed to make HD compliant disk without having it in an airtight sealed container. Clever stuff.

    2. Re:Isn't this a FLOPPY ? by scrutty · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the link. In that paper they are talking about a titianium alloy disk, which I appreciate as being "hard". Where did the mylar disk mentioned in the slashdot story and the linked article enter the picture, I wonder ? Thats the bit I was quibbling. The white paper is pretty informative though.

      --
      -- Oh Well
    3. Re:Isn't this a FLOPPY ? by Sloppy · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but cheap physically-small floppies that hold multiple gigabytes, are still pretty cool. I always thought that IOMega's "click" disks (I think they're called something else now?) would be very useful, if only the capacity were increased by two orders of magnitude. Now it sounds like it has finally happened, which makes sense, since other storage techs actually have improved by that much in the last few years.

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    4. Re:Isn't this a FLOPPY ? by cornjchob · · Score: 1

      That's what I thought as well, especially considering other applications of this thing as a regular credit card. Reading the magnetic strip is one thing, but writing to it is another. It didn't seem to me like they implemented any sort of shielding, so wouldn't writing to the magnetic strip mess up the data on the platter?

      --
      We now have confirmed reports from an informed Orange County minister that Ethel is still an active communist.
  41. Uses by liquidsin · · Score: 1

    The article states that they're already in talks with content producers. They also make a point of stating that it's large and fast enough to stream media and that it has an onboard processor capable of on-the-fly encryption. Looks like they wanna see these things on the shelves next to dvds. Also, the article says that the cards store anywhere from 100 mb to 5 gb. Does this mean that the 'under $15' pricetag they talk about is for a 100mb model? Anybody got any more info?

    --
    do not read this line twice.
  42. Please parse the topic for me by guacamolefoo · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Credit Card sized 5GB HD to become late this year"

    So...:

    1. Is it coming late this year, or
    2. Is it on target but is going to become late sometime later this year, or
    3. Is it going through a transcendant, life-changing experience sometime during this year, or...

    GF.

    GF.

    1. Re:Please parse the topic for me by CrosseyedPainless · · Score: 2, Funny

      *LOL*

      Actually, I think its quite clear and accurate. They will announce that it will ship this year, but instead, it will become late this year.

      Also, if the history of innovative storage techniques holds true, it will be too expensive (when released) to gain acceptance. When the price comes down to where buyers might take notice, 5 gigs will be about as useful as a floppy, rendering the device affordable and nearly useless.

    2. Re:Please parse the topic for me by Pieroxy · · Score: 1

      Forget it. You always see these kind of revolutionary stuff for $15 "late this year".

      It's just a wording issue: You should read "decade" or "century" where you actually read "year"

  43. Is flexible good? by Alcohol+Fueled · · Score: 1
    "Also, the card--like a credit card--is extremely flexible, without risking damage to the data it contains, he says."

    Umm.. I would think that this thing being flexible would somehow cause some kind of damage to the parts inside. Seems to me that if you bend it, purposely or accidentally, it'll be screwy.


    --
    Ah am not a crook! (\(-__-)/)
    1. Re:Is flexible good? by Tha_Zanthrax · · Score: 2, Funny

      this can be possible, remember paper?
      you could write something on it and then even after you folded it, you could still read it...
      that stuff was the bomb...

    2. Re:Is flexible good? by Alcohol+Fueled · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but paper has no moving parts or anything. You can fold or ball up paper, and still be able to read it. You can't fold something with moving parts and expect it to work 100% again. It's the same thing as bending a floppy disk, almost. You can bend it just a tad, but if you bend it to for, your disk is gone.

      --
      Ah am not a crook! (\(-__-)/)
  44. durable? by adamruck · · Score: 2, Informative

    so how durable is this unit going to be? If you drop it is it going to be unreadable? What about heat? If you leave your wallet in the winshield with one of these things is it going to mess up the data? Did anyone do any stress tests on these things?

    --
    Selling software wont make you money, selling a service will.
  45. Vaporware by DOsinga · · Score: 1

    I call vaporware. Breakthroughs do occur, but if you compare this against the IBM microdrive this thing is a lot smaller in size, has five times the capacity and costs US$ 15 instead of US$ 200. Would be very cool, but I don't think so.

  46. Competes with connectivity? by mikewas · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I see lots of comparisons to other drive technologies, but is that the competition? With better conenctivity (e.g. mobile/wireless net access, WiFi islands, DSL in hotels) do I really need portable storage? If I can connect to my fixed storage from nearly anywhere, why do I need to carry yet another piece of hardware?

    --

    "Glory is fleeting, but obscurity is forever." --Napoleon Bonaparte
    1. Re:Competes with connectivity? by Salamander · · Score: 1
      If I can connect to my fixed storage from nearly anywhere, why do I need to carry yet another piece of hardware?

      That's actually a very good question. However, there's also a really good answer: bandwidth. Sure, you might be doing OK for most things if you're in an 802.11b (or, better yet, 802.11g) hotspot, but not if you're doing anything I/O intensive (like high-res media). Cellular bandwidth isn't going to be truly sufficient even for light storage I/O any time soon, and there will always be some blackout times or areas.

      Sure, you say, so you use a local disk as a fast cache to avoid going over the net for every single block, but the authoritative copy (or copies) is still "out there" rather than on your laptop. It just so happens I've done a few years' work in exactly that area, and here's the thing: that cache needs to be fairly large, and it needs to be fairly fast, so you're back to needing some sort of reasonably high-capacity high-bandwidth local storage in a small form factor. That's why something like this would still be useful.

      --
      Slashdot - News for Herds. Stuff that Splatters.
  47. "Yea, great." by Talonius · · Score: 1

    Yea, that's great. Let's give employers access to that data too! Then they can screen folks who have diseases or "chronic problems" that they don't want to deal with.

    Medical information in a database? Are you fucking nuts? Yea, if it was SECURE I'd be all for it. But it won't be. And guaran-goddamned-tee life insurance companies will want access to it as soon as it's available. "Mr. Schkerke we see here that you weighed 300 pounds in 1996. Even though you only currently weight 150 pounds now we're going to have to charge you the overweight rate." Don't think that won't happen? For Christ's sake look at the Finnish double taxxing radio broadcasts. Buy a record, pay taxes to listen! Look at the crazy bullshit the RIAA is trying.

    Government is nothing more than a corporate whore. The sooner you people realize this the better. The government does NOTHING to help you personally. Everything they do is approved and endorsed by some corporation whose got their dick stuck up their reprsentatives' ass.

    And that's not just in the US either.

    Wake up and smell the coffee.

    --
    My reality check bounced.
    1. Re:"Yea, great." by October_30th · · Score: 1
      Let's give employers access to that data too!

      Access to data will obviously have to be given on a need to know basis. As it is already with the dead-tree records, employers and insurance companies don't have any business accessing your medical records and need your permission to access it. Doctors don't care about your schooling history and so on.

      Remember: all this information is already in databases. And some of it gets leaked out accidentally once in a while as well as most probably gets accessed illegally too. However, the important point is: the sky has not fallen down.

      Having the same data in digital databases will not change this. It will make the access only more convenient for those who have the right to it and it will also make easier to restrict access to it.

      --
      The owls are not what they seem
    2. Re:"Yea, great." by Qzukk · · Score: 1

      Access to data will obviously have to be given on a need to know basis

      M4d Fr33z4H n33dz t0 kn0!!1!

      Seriously. Just the existance of something like this is like waving a flag reading "I AM ID10T! HAXX0R ME PLZ K THX!1!!" Pretending your medical data is going to be secure is like putting your head in a box and thinking you're invisible. Not only will the average cracker be wanting to get your ID numbers and history for a little ID theft and a credit line or two, I wouldn't doubt that some of the more-than-average crackers would be getting a little extra cash from untraceable payments made by insurance companies or just very large employers.

      Of course, thats just my experience in the USA, where even calling to ask about whether something is covered by insurance is reasonable enough cause to jack the insurance rates up. Maybe in other countries, insurance is either government-provided or provided by companies who truly have the best interests of the people at heart, and seek to provide the highest quality care for the lowest prices (*snort* yeah right).

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
  48. incredibly cheap by MankyD · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That price seems really cheap to me. The latest Zip750 goes way above that price, comparatively, and has much larger media, physically. There must be some drawback to these, something they're not telling us. How do companies like Iomega plan on responding to this product?

    --
    -dave
    http://millionnumbers.com/ - own the number of your dreams
    1. Re:incredibly cheap by jandrese · · Score: 1

      Newsflash: Zip disks have always been horribly overpriced. That's why the readers were comparatively cheap (compared to the previous generation Syquest and IOmega drives at least). That's also why nobody uses zip disks anymore, CDs are much more cost effective. Even write once CDr discs can be bought for $0.10/each down at my local Best Buy (and I don't live in a cheap area). 100Mb Zip disks cost $10/each in bulk in the same store (and just about everywhere else). Not to mention the drives are still slow as can be and fewer and fewer computers have zip drives on them at all these days (while nearly every computer has a CD-ROM on it).

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    2. Re:incredibly cheap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not only are ZIP disks horribly overpriced, they're about as reliable as your average Floppy disk also. We even had one where old data, after being deleted, managed to 'resurface' in the middle of a file we were trying to use. Not a pretty sight once we visually checked the contents of the file.

      For personal needs I use a combination of CD-R and GigaMO. The disks hold 1.3GB (I bought my drive about half a year before the 2.3GB version appeared...) and cost $10. So for the same price I get 10x the storage for the same price in a much more reliable format than ZIP. About the only downside is the slower write speed compared to the blazing read speeds. Then again it isn't any slower than a ZIP...

    3. Re:incredibly cheap by MrDolby · · Score: 1

      Maybe Iomega is the large blank media company that plans to partnership with them.

      To quote the article
      "The company is talking with media producers, and a partnership announcement with a widely recognized producer of blank media is expected in the next month, Heil says."

      Of course it could be any number of large blank media companies.

  49. Re:Video use by caino59 · · Score: 1

    well, thatpretty much answers everyones question as far as video use...forget about using it to watch your divx files from...

  50. This could really boost smart cards by swillden · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If this StorCard is what it claims to be, and if it's sufficiently durable and reliable, it could just be the technology that finally makes smart cards really widespread.

    Why? Well, one of the major things holding smart cards back has been the fact that, in most cases, consumers have no interest in them. All kinds of fantastically-useful applications have been dreamed up, but nearly all of them fail because the infrastructure costs are astronomical, and blow the business case out of the water. This card, however, offers significant value to the consumer, enough that people will be willing to pay for the cards and to buy and install readers on their home computers. There will still be significant costs to build the software, the host-side systems, deploy kiosks and terminals at stores, doctor's offices, etc., but the cost of cards and home readers are a huge burden, and this could lift it.

    The Storcard web site has a PDF with "Technical Specifications", but it appears to be slashdotted or just not there, so I can't see what kind of interfaces the card supports. I would really hope they'd include an ISO 7816 (smart card) serial interface in addition to the high-speed interface. They're claiming the card has a processor for crypto and access control, which is critically important. The one other major question in my mind is durability -- is this a card that is expected to be carefully inserted inside a digital camera and then left there except to be occasionally (carefully) placed in a PC-attached reader? Or is it something I can keep in my wallet, sit on, run through the washing machine, use as an ice scraper, etc.?

    --
    Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    1. Re:This could really boost smart cards by Digital11 · · Score: 5, Informative

      From StorCard.com: The StorCard has the flexibility and form factor of a credit card and conforms to ISO 7816-1 including mechanical flexibility along the longitudinal and transverse axis without damage to the IC or the magnetic recording medium.

      --
      I am a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar.
  51. One Question: by gillbates · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Will bending the card cause a head crash? Or are these more like zip drives, in which the read head is in the reader and engages the disk only when inserted?

    I can't imagine too many people would want to carry these around in their wallets if a slight bend could destroy them....

    --
    The society for a thought-free internet welcomes you.
    1. Re:One Question: by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      Will bending the card cause a head crash? Or are these more like zip drives, in which the read head is in the reader and causes a head crash only when inserted?

      I fixed your post.

  52. very neat by esarjeant · · Score: 2

    And it looks like they will provide a PCMCIA-style reader device as well. This provides excellent backward compatibility, but the real test will be to get support from a major hardware vendor (Dell, Apple, HP?) and bundle the card reader into new PC's.

    Some weirdness in their product description though. "...the StorReader supports a sustained data transfer rate of 5 megabytes per second in the 100 megabyte StorCard, and scales in the 5 gigabyte design".

    I wonder what they mean by "scales".... YMMV?

    --

    Eric Sarjeant
    eric[@]sarjeant.com

  53. Storage Space by SomeOtherGuy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The article says that storage space is between 100 meg and 5 gig. I bet that much like the buz phrase: "With upgradable fimware to support future media formats....cough OGG" -- that you will be holding a bunch of 15 dollar 100 meg cards with another soon to be famous "Will support up to 5 gig" promise that will never materialize. (And then just at the end of the products life -- they will come out with a handful of really expensive 5 gig cards -- at the same time they start to list their coffee machines and foozball tables on ebay....)

    --
    (+1 Funny) only if I laugh out loud.
    1. Re:Storage Space by jetkust · · Score: 1

      According to their web site. 5 gigs will be availiable in 2005.

  54. Floppy? by msheppard · · Score: 1

    How is this significantly different than a 3.5" floppy? Size is huge yes, but technology wise, it sounds like a really good floppy.

    M@

    --
    Krispy Cream is people
  55. Re:Credit Card sized 5GB HD to become late this ye by TheGreatGraySkwid · · Score: 1

    I just assumed it was getting together with a Zip disk and planning a little portable storage family...

    --
    The Humblest Mollusk on the Net
  56. Does it have content control built in? by jacoplane · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think this device will only take off if they don't include any content control like floppy discs or CDs. Remember what happened to Dataplay ???

    1. Re:Does it have content control built in? by Hobbex · · Score: 1

      Well, the built in encryption chip should be enough to make one smell rat, and looking over their webpage the front page bosts that their product solves "the increased concerns with information security for consumers, enterprises and content owners."

      Digging deeper:

      Security & Intelligence - industry's first intelligent media with the ability to authenticate an individual and his own data, to encrypt and secure the data, and to enforce policy information on how and when the data may be used.

      Look like we have a winner...

  57. It's a floppy disk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Excuse me, but this technology is already well established. We thought it was obsolete.

    1. Re:It's a floppy disk by dethl · · Score: 2, Informative

      Sure, the StorCard and the floppy have the same medium (Mylar disk), but StorCard's is apparently formatted different. Also note the 3600 rpm of the StorCard, while a floppy has what, 600 or 700 rpm? This thing is faster, stores more, and is dirt cheap for what you get.

      --
      "Some fight for law. Some fight for justice. What will you fight for? One day, you will see."
  58. "To become late" ? by Zerbey · · Score: 1

    In Memorium: One 5Gb hard drive. Died peacefully in its sleep last night after a brief illness.

    In lieu of flowers, please make a donation to the "Help Slashdotters with Grammar" foundation.

  59. Yo it what it is by jhines · · Score: 2, Funny

    Spinning wheel of mylar?

    That is a floppy folks, not a hard drive.

    1. Re:Yo it what it is by Master+Mage · · Score: 1

      Most definately much closer to a floppy. From StarCard Technology Page:

      "A flexible magnetic disk is housed inside a cavity created between the top and bottom layers of the card."

      "A window is provided on the bottom and a shutter that slides between the layers of the card, backs this window sealing the disk enclosure. An external mechanism (in the StorReader) can actuate this shutter opening the window and providing access to the recording disk."

      Is it just me, or is this sounding very familiar? I think I have a couple hundred things around my room that fit this description.

      Don't get me wrong though, having a 100 meg floppy the the size of a credit card would be great. If it can stand up to daily use and carrying, with the potential of scaling, then I may well seriously consider getting one when they appear locally.

      Just watch you don't put in in your eelskin wallet!
      (Yes, I know that was solved already.)

  60. Re:Credit Card sized 5GB HD to become late this ye by Quixadhal · · Score: 4, Funny

    Grammer odd not, I think.

    -yoda.

  61. Included processor for encryption? by NaugaHunter · · Score: 1

    OK. Maybe my caffeine hasn't kicked in yet, but what good does this do? I mean, it sounds like there is an encryption chip on each card or drive, essentially. Is this really that much better than a smaller chip with just a password control? Is someone really going to separate whatever passes for a platter, try to read it somewhere else, and then hit the encryption? If it requires a password, wouldn't it be possible to write something that basically just keeps throwing things at it until it cracks?

    Maybe there is more to it than was there, or I missed it, but it seems that the encryption may just be marketing. I don't see how to access the drive without the chip.

    --
    R: That voice. Where have I heard that voice before? B: In about 365 other episodes. But I don't know who it is either.
  62. Let me guess.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And it will be found in a dumpster with 5000 credit card numbers. ;-)

  63. More correct Douglas Adam quote: by tbspit · · Score: 4, Informative

    "Come," called the old man, "come now or you will be late." "Late?" said Arthur. "What for?" "What is your name, human?" "Dent. Arthur Dent," said Arthur. "Late, as in the late Dentarthurdent," said the old man, sternly. "It's a sort of threat you see." Another wistful look came into his tired old eyes. "I've never been very good at them myself, but I'm told they can be very effective."

  64. Re:Credit Card sized 5GB HD to become late this ye by Motherfucking+Shit · · Score: 1

    >Maybe they are planning to kill off the technology

    Nah, they're just testing a new strategy in vaporware... Let everyone know it's not going to materialize first, then the investors can't possibly be upset when it's late! ;)

    --
    "BSD: Free as in speech. Linux: Free as in beer. Windows 10: Free as in herpes." --Man On Pink Corner in #52607549.
  65. Anyone checked out Storcard.com? by Thedalek · · Score: 1

    Click on the -products- link there to see an interesting illustration of uses of the Storcard.

    They somehow think that MS is going to let them use these things in the XBox.

    Secondly, the site says "capacity from 100 megabytes to 5+ gigabytes". Which do you think will cost $15?

    --
    Happiness is relative, Based upon the way we live.
  66. Credit card CD's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I got a credit card shaped CD from The Halifax (UK), 15mb capacity, with some flash demo on it...

    Is this the same type of thing?

  67. Facts by nuggz · · Score: 1

    Don't let facts get in the way of a good headline.

    People use the wrong terms all the time, it is MUCh less stressful to just give up.

  68. All the Juicy Technical Details by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    are available here.

    Well, at least some of the juicy technical details.

    Well, at least it references an ISO standard (ISO 7816).

  69. Cost by cwolves1 · · Score: 1

    Is this going to be one of those micro-storage devices that starts at $15/media but approaches $500 for any useful storage capacity? (ie the IBM microdrive)

  70. IT IS A *#$&ING DRM CARD!!!!!! by Alsee · · Score: 4, Interesting

    within the card is an on-board processor containing integrated software controls that can encrypt data securely in real time.

    The increased concerns with information security for consumers, enterprises and content owners

    bind information to a particular application or device.


    Security & Intelligence - industry's first intelligent media with the ability to authenticate an individual and his own data, to encrypt and secure the data, and to enforce policy information on how and when the data may be used

    StorCard uses a combination of storage, processing and security technologies, packaged into a convenient credit card form factor. An on-board processor with integrated software controls authentication encrypts data securely and executes policies that manage the data. The information is stored on the integrated high-capacity rotating storage volume. The result is a 100% secure, environment that allows individuals, enterprise and content providers to transact and exchange information safely and comfortably wherever and whenever it is needed.

    (a) the encryption logic and keys are unique for each storage medium or unit, (b) the algorithm and the key can be economically changed without compromising legal access to the content, and (c) information pertaining to the algorithm or the key is always kept secret, and is never made available or communicated over a public channel.

    the security logic can be programmed to allow access which is time dependent or for a predetermined number of accesses after which the key and the data in the storage volume is randomly ERASED.


    mailto:info@storcard.com

    -

    --
    - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    1. Re:IT IS A *#$&ING DRM CARD!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree.

      Maybe they can chenget the name to the DCMA Floppy?

  71. Slashdot Editor to be late this year. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess you insert available in the story title, and fired in my subject.

  72. Burn a CD by nuggz · · Score: 1

    How is this any different then burning a CD.
    500-700 megs in 1.5-2 minutes.
    nearly 10 tiumes the size in about 10 times the time.
    This isn't unreasonable.

  73. Re:Credit Card sized 5GB HD to become late this ye by sdcharle · · Score: 1

    I just thought it was refreshingly honest technology reporting. New technology we were promised this year has snowball's chance in hell of actually coming out this year. It will be late.

  74. To good to be true? by jesus_watkins · · Score: 5, Insightful
    It seems to good to be true. The company's website seems to be very short on real details. Although the product could be real. All of the photos appear are mock ups.

    From the website it suggest the card only contains the disc plus some simple electronics. The actual motor for the device is held in the reader.

    But there are already PC card hard drives that can hold 5 GB of space. So if you are going to have to put it in a PC card adapter each time you want to use it then the size benefit is cancelled out.

    1. Re:To good to be true? by mikecrumm · · Score: 1

      No sir, you don't have to put it IN the reader. Just set it close, and think about it real hard.

      --
      --Snoogans
  75. Speed - 5 megabytes a second? by Skevos+Mavros · · Score: 2, Informative
    Does anyone have any information of the REAL speed of this device? How much data per second can one RELIABLY pull off this thing? Or are there no prototypes out there in the hands of slashdot readers? At US$15 each, it can't be that fast, can it? Dare I hope for DV cameras with a stack of these plugged into the back instead of tapes?

    I've been to their site and had a quick look, but found only this:

    ISO 7816 communication speed is 9600 baud, while the StorReader supports a sustained data transfer rate of 5 megabytes per second in the 100 megabyte StorCard, and scales in the 5 gigabyte design.

    Does "scales" means what I think it does? It's surely too good to be true that, if the 100 meg card is 5 megabytes a second, that the 5 gig card is 250 meg a second. Yeah, that's too good to be true. Plus knowing me my math is probably off.

    I'm guessing that since they mention USB but not USB2 that it's not fast enough for broadcastable video. But I can hope. :-)

    1. Re:Speed - 5 megabytes a second? by The+Creator · · Score: 1

      Does "scales" means what I think it does? It's surely too good to be true that, if the 100 meg card is 5 megabytes a second, that the 5 gig card is 250 meg a second. Yeah, that's too good to be true. Plus knowing me my math is probably off.

      If the data density increases, but not the rotational speed, then you should get the square root of the data capacity increase in read speed increase.

      100MB -> 5MB/s
      5000MB -> 35MB/s

      This is because the dat density on a surfase is the product of the data density in two directions, while only the density in one direction is relevant to the read speed.

      --

      FRA: STFU GTFO
  76. MAndated to carry by Unknown+Poltroon · · Score: 1

    But, gee, i mean, mine keeps breaking officer, you know how this cutting edge technology is when you spill a beer on it and then step on it accidentially while drunk.

    --
    All Troll + "offtopic" mods are meta moderated as "Unfair", because you abused the system.
  77. Could be good for the PDA market. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now that the processor speeds for PDA's are increasing and the OS's more rich in features..this could be a great addition to the market. Slap one in side and have storage for MP3's..etc.

  78. Nah. Its got moving parts... by crovira · · Score: 1

    If I have to buy a separate reader (USB & FireWire please) I'd rather not take the chance of the media (the card-drive itself) breaking on me as it makes repeated transitions from wallet to reader or bouncing around in my pocket and being subjected to other thermal/physical stresses.

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
  79. I just wait by Curialis · · Score: 1

    and see how well the media stands up to time. I remember thinking how great the 2GB ORB drives were but the drive quality never seemed to get there. When I see another /. article in a year saying how great these things are and how they are revolutionizing the industry I may commit some data to them.

  80. The more things change.... by jimfrost · · Score: 1
    Is it just me, or does this sound like a modern take on the floppy disk?

    --
    jim frost
    jimf@frostbytes.com
  81. music potential. by BFaucet · · Score: 1

    So how long unil we can buy 4 days worth of music for $50, then play it on a player the size of a wallet that holds 8 cards?

    Anyway, I'm wondering how well these cards can handle forces.

    --
    -Derick
  82. late = pregnant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hopefully we'll have lots of HD-lets around.

  83. Why USB? by Dark+Lord+Seth · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Seriously, why USB? Why do I have to use an external connector and external device for something that I'd much rather have inside? Why not a 3,5"/' (damned imperial system) bay slot as a reader? And if it comes with internal processor and all, why not use it as a removable network drive? Users stuff their creditcard into the reader, machine reads stored username and key, compares it with domain server, grants user access to his or her network files while having 5gb for other programs...

    1. Re:Why USB? by a7244270 · · Score: 1

      Why not a 3,5"/' (damned imperial system) bay slot as a reader? And if it comes with internal processor and all, why not use it as a removable network drive?

      Why not bluetooth ? no slot needed.

    2. Re:Why USB? by Winterblink · · Score: 1

      Because some people have laptops, and they may want to buy one reader instead of two, one internal for their PC and one for their laptop.

      --
      "I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar."
      -Hoban Washburn
    3. Re:Why USB? by KalvinB · · Score: 1

      When ZIP first came out it was parallel port only. Then later came the USB and intenal versions.

      Mass market likes USB because mass market doesn't like opening up their computer and fiddling with cables so USB it is.

      Once they make enough money to justify the cost to cater to the smaller market, then you'll see an internal version. Or maybe if we're lucky they'll come out with both at the same time.

      Ben

    4. Re:Why USB? by adolf · · Score: 1

      PCMCIA storage is already ATA-compliant.

      It's really not a bad form factor. Since they propose to have a PCMCIA "reader" / "drive", you'll be able to pop this into an inexpensive, completely passive (read: PCB, two connectors, and a bit of plastic) 3.5" PCMCIA/IDE adapter on your desktop machine.

      And then, slide the contraption out, and carry it over to a friend's house. Once there, you'll be able to insert the same drive into his laptop, hot, and use it as a local peripheral. Or use the USB adapter that they've got sitting around for their digital camera.

      But your ID idea is rather disconcerting. Why would I want to carry expensive media around with me as a "network key?" Why would I, as an admin, want to allow my users to run programs on my machines which they carry back and forth to work? Why would I want to use expensive, easily-lost media to store programs, when the box I'm working on (or the servers it is connected to) already has plenty of space for them?

      I thought we finally grew out of using removable storage for programs sometime in the late 80s. Correct me if I'm wrong.

      Existant USB memory "keys" already fit ID purposes, along with common smartcards, and magstripes. None of these are popular today for general computing (perhaps because a username/password combo is easier, better, and simpler?), but they all do the ID thing just as well as this new vapor-gizmo, for less money.

    5. Re:Why USB? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      When ZIP first came out it was parallel port only. Then later came the USB and intenal versions.

      No. When ZIP first came out it was SCSI only. The parallel port version and others came later. ;)

    6. Re:Why USB? by shylock0 · · Score: 1
      I'm a consultant, and I know several network admins (not to mention upper management) who would love the idea. Think about it for a second. If we're talking full hard drives the size of a credit card, it would allow an office to be equipped entirely with dumb terminals. 100 cubicles, 100 dumb terminals.

      The way it works today, Joe from marketing flies from the NY office to the LA office for a week. Joe from marketing uses Adobe Illustrator for page layout. But Adobe Illustrator is an expensive program, and it isn't licensed on any of the computers Joe can get his hands on out in LA. By letting Joe take his entire harddrive, apps included, it drastically simplifies corporate licensing. Give each employee only the apps they need, and let them carry them everywhere they go. Granted, we could've given Joe a laptop -- but there are a huge number of other headaches involved with that, like reconfiguring Joe's laptop to work with the office network every time his 16 year old configures it for a LAN party. Dumb terminals are also a lot cheaper than laptops.

      Apps are still too large, and the method too slow, to keep on central servers. An easy removable hard disk solution is the perfect answer to the aforementioned issues. If its fast enough to a complete system, I think the 5 gig models will be great.

      --
      Statistically speaking, there's a 99.998% chance that my IQ is higher than yours. Get over it.
    7. Re:Why USB? by adolf · · Score: 1

      Dumb terminals are indeed quite cheap, but what you're proposing is a general-purpose computer, with all the requisite bits that a computer needs, except for a conventional hard drive. Instead, it would be equipped with a still-nonexistant removable medium that only holds 5 gigabytes (admittedly, plenty for most office purposes) at greater cost than just tossing a hard drive in there.

      Fast forward a bit: We just tossed two buildings-worth of hard drives, to implement a more expensive system which makes no difference to the daily work that Dan, Jane, and Sally do at their desks, except that they've now got to guard their storage system from pilferage by casual passers-by.

      All so that jet-set Joe can do some work on the left coast periodically, without each office springing for a copy of Illustrator.

      Buy Joe a laptop. He might even get some work done on the plane. If Joe's kid trashes the company laptop at a LAN party, that sounds like it'd be Joe's problem to solve. Just as it would be if Joe's kid reconfigured the company car after a keg party.

      What about "I ran out of space, Dad, so I borrowed that disk you carry in your briefcase. Naah, it didn't have much room, either, so I nuked it. Yeah, it's got the last four seasons of the Simpsons on it now..."

    8. Re:Why USB? by shylock0 · · Score: 1
      I think you also gain certain advantages if you use this system with absolutely identical hardware all around. For example: If Joe's computer stops working due to software failure, I can just hand him a temporary card so that he can get his work done. I can then sit in my office and troubleshoot what's wrong with on the software end -- and easily ascertain that it's a software problem simply by dropping another card into Joe's computer.

      Many IT departments solve the above problems by switching their entire workforce to identical laptops. But let's do a quick cost analysis here. Let's assume a corporation of 100 employees. That 100 * $3,000 (which is about what a decently-equipped ThinkPad costs these days) = 300,000. On the other hand, we go with the dumb terminal idea. 100 * $1,500 (and I think that $1,500 is at the high end) = $150,000. That's 50% savings. It justifies those Dell commercials where the IT guy saves the day. On top of which, we save money in licensing. And in support. And in non-support man hours. Huge savings.

      I also don't think that the credit card drive is any more dangerous, security wise, than a laptop. When was the last time you forgot your wallet at airport security? When was the last time you forgot your laptop? I'm just a consultant so I don't have to deal with shit like that, but the IT guys I know at mid-size corporations spend probably 5 hours a week trying to track down lost laptops. But wallets? We safeguard those a little better. That ties right back to the cost factor. Cost of replacing a $3,000 laptop: $3,000. Cost of replacing a $15 hard-drive card: $15. That's quite the math.

      --
      Statistically speaking, there's a 99.998% chance that my IQ is higher than yours. Get over it.
  84. Huge Storage,Small,Cheap - Reminds me of DataPlay by acomj · · Score: 1

    Remember dataplay, quarter sized disks holding huge amounts. Going to replace minidiscs/ had music companies signed up etc..etc..

    What happened? While technically feasable the implimentation was too difficult. Delays and out of cash.

    Joins a long list of failed media. MD-Data, Jazz, SyQuest, Digital Compact Casset..

    While the technology is neat, I'll beleive it when I see it.

  85. Re:Video use by bdeclerc · · Score: 1
    forget about using it to watch your divx files from...

    Why? Those specs are way faster than is needed for watching DIVX-movies (lessee : high-quality DIVX : 1 cd / 1 hour) ==> 700Mb / 3600s ==> 200 kb/s

    Even DVD is easily possible (4.7GB/2hours = 650 kb/s). At 5MB/s DVD-quality HDTV is feasible.
  86. Not for use in cold places.... by Darren.Moffat · · Score: 2, Informative

    The technical specs for the cards say they only work between 5C and 55C. Not much use for large parts of the Global in winter. Non operating mode goes down to -20C.

    So using it in your portable PDA, MP3/OGG player etc in winter is just too bad ;-(

    1. Re:Not for use in cold places.... by Dan+B. · · Score: 1

      Maybe your PDA/MP3/etc. player generates enough heat to raise the temp in the card slot to 5C - I know my lappy definitely does. In fact, most of the cards I have pulled out of a laptop are pushing the limit of being too hot.

      I don't think cool winters will be as much of a problem as hot summers, eg. Oz.

      --
      Dan. -- So what if it's spelt wrong, nobody's perfect
  87. Sounds like the Zip drive by stratjakt · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Just bigger and a bit smaller. Maybe more like the Jaz drive.

    The Zip drive was as cool piece of gear, I still use mine fairly regularly to shuttle files to and from the office.

    I'm wondering, though, if this thing will have the same drawbacks, namely:

    - too slow, both throughput and seek time. Made it OK for archiving, but you couldnt really run software off it

    - too expensive, when CD-Rs started being a buck a pop, 20 bucks for 100 meg zip disks was silly

    - too prone to failure. They frankly wore out too quick

    - The Jaz drives were notoriously buggy and glitchy, and died all the time. A good friend had one and did nothing but cuss about it

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  88. Just what I need... by Perplexer · · Score: 2, Funny

    Another expensive device I'll accidentally sit on.

  89. Re:Yeah but, (RTAS) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is a difference between not reading and not believing.

    And I doubt that these cards will be unscathed when some 20 stone lardass sits down on them on a regular basis, and given the increasing number of 20 stone lardasses around I think there will be a few problems.

  90. Like Flying Cars From Moeller..... by TechnoGrl · · Score: 1

    If it seems too good to be true...it probably is.

    Until it's in actually on the market for $150 then it's VaporWare....just another press release designed to drum up money for someone who has a neat idea....or maybe needs a new Beemer...whatever.

    --
    ----- In Your Cubicle No One Can Hear You Scream...
  91. Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Great, now I have to rip the White Album again.

  92. Star Trek computer cards by WarpedMind · · Score: 1

    For marketing to geeks, they need to release the cards in various colors of red, orange, green and so forth to make them look like the cards they were always inserting into the computers in Star Trek.

    I still find it facinating to compare some of the technology "predicted" in that series and things that are around today.

  93. Don't put it in your pocket... by Hythlodaeus · · Score: 1

    "The card actually has moveable parts inside its thin shell,"

    Anyone have an idea of the mean time between failure on that?

    --
    For great justice.
  94. Floppy? by sporty · · Score: 1

    What's the difference, concept wise, between this and a floppy disc?

    --

    -
    ping -f 255.255.255.255 # if only

  95. I can see it now... by Kakarat · · Score: 1
    Clerk: Sir, how would you like to pay for this?
    Customer: Here, use my StorCard.
    Clerk: Ok, let me just pop it into the reader here....
    Clerk: Um, Sir, this card just contains porn.
    Customer: Uh, uh, how did that get on there!?

    --
    "I bet I'll get blamed for this." --Mayor Quimby
  96. bigger universal storage device would be better... by strick · · Score: 1

    I'd rather have a regular-sized HD with lots of storage (say 100gig or so to start) with a built in rechargeable battery and Bluetooth. I'd put this thing in my briefcase and forget it. Form factor becomes less important when you talk about something that sits in your briefcase all day.

    Don't get me wrong, increasing storage density is a worthy goal, but we actually have the technology today to build the bluetooth thingy and this would solve a need for lots of people.

    MP3 players, portable video players, cell phones, whatever... could feed off this storage. Oh yeah, you could plug it in to your computer at home or at the office with USB2 or firewire when you need higher xfer rates for things like backup or working off the actual drive.

    I carry around a pocketec 20gig usb2 hard drive already, I just wish it were actually useful when it isn't plugged into something. I would gladly carry something 3 or 4 times as big if it had bluetooth and a battery.

  97. Why is the credit card shape important? by estoll · · Score: 1

    Why is it important for it to be the shape of a credit card? Considering how thin it is, I'm sure with the moving parts inside of it, they would never recommend placing this thing in your wallet and sitting on it. I would rather have something that fits better on a keychain or is inside my cell phone.

    --
    http://www.askthevoid.com
  98. How reliable are the cards? by SoCalChris · · Score: 1

    Ok, this looks really cool, but I wonder how they will hold up? I used to have an old car stereo made by Blaupunkt, which used a smartcard like this instead of a removeable faceplate for security. After about a year of use, the microprocessor had pretty much seperated from the card and was about to fall out. I also was never comfortable with the card being able to flex like a credit card like they promise because it was actually a little stiffer, and felt more brittle than a credit card.

    Of course, a years worth of use on a card like that for under $15 still isn't bad, I would just hope that I would be able to get my data from the card before it came apart. This also has the added complexity of moving parts inside, so it might be even less reliable than my stereo's card was. That is some really cool technology though.

  99. Helping data smuggling.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Curious how long it will take for people to disguise these as credit cards and smuggle data across the border.

    1. Re:Helping data smuggling.. by Mongo222 · · Score: 1

      What the hell would I want to smuggle data across the border for? The internet works quite well for this.

  100. Too late to market... by sunbane · · Score: 2, Interesting

    They are going to face what has just about put iomega out of business. I can already buy 4.7GB dvd+r media for $3-4... By the time this comes out we'll be starting to be close to the Blu-Ray discs that hold 27GB and will probably be just as cheap as these $15 drives. I just don't see it happening - especially when you need a dedicated reader. So as far as removable media it is doomed.

    Then as far as a one time standalone? The fact that you need a special reader kills it. Notebook harddrives are already very small and higher density (even have 20GB in an iPod!) and the IBM Microdrive is already out in 4GB and will fit in a standard compact flash slot. Just don't see this happening.

    1. Re:Too late to market... by afidel · · Score: 1

      This is not targeted for removable media, but rather portable media, the size is small in all three dimensions. They do not require a special reader, they can be used with sleves in PC Card slots so anything that can accept a pc card can read them with a simple sleve. The iPod's hdd is too thick for use in devices like digital camera's etc, as far as microdrives, they cost more than the equivilant amount of solid state storage and suck batteries at about 5X the rate so they were irrelivant about a year and a half ago.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    2. Re:Too late to market... by TheLink · · Score: 1

      AFAIK they need a StorReader.

      As for size: I have business card sized CDRWs, and also the 8cm 200MB CDRWs.

      You can have mini 8cm DVDRWs too (about 1.4GB per side). Apparently these are already being used in some consumer electronics products (video cams?) (wonder what it does to battery life tho ;) ).

      The only issue I see is the non random access write with some DVD technologies. But if they fix and agree on a decent standard, this thing is so dead. Even though the DVD bunch aren't executing well, this guys have to execute pretty much perfectly (and even then they'll have to get lucky) - tons of DVDs are already out on the market. PC manufacturers are already including DVD readers and writers as standard on higher end offerings.

      If they had a 100MB+ smartcard which works with normal smartcard readers, things could be a lot different. But since they need their own reader, there's not much safe landing room amongst the DVDs, USB thumbdrives, compact flash cards, microdrives and not least removable HDDs.

      Can you give me a good reason why this will make it?

      --
  101. Digital cameras in africa by mks113 · · Score: 1

    You have obviously never used a digital camera in the middle of africa. Thousands of photos begging to be taken, and no internet connectivity of any sort (short of sattelite) for hundreds of kilometers.

    There is a place for this sort of thing. My Mavica and a stack of floppy disks didn't do too badly, but I really would have liked to have higher resolution.

  102. Credit Card sized 5GB HD... by Wolfier · · Score: 1

    ...is still a frigging HD, much like, "the king of spam is still a spammer".

    Let's abandon the whole small HD idea already and go for solid state.

  103. Public terminals useful now? by eagl · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't something like this make public terminals more useful?

    5 GB of encrypted data is more than enough to store a complete desktop workspace and even if it's not durable enough to put in a wallet, it IS small enough for a shirt or front pocket. The ideal companion software for this device would be an operating system utility to dump your entire workspace onto the card so you can set up anywhere anytime without worrying about setup hassles or security. The article mentions onboard encryption so even losing the device wouldn't be an immediate loss or compromise of your workspace property.

    At my work, we have a network infrastructure problem so our system admins won't give us roaming profiles even though the nature of our business means that we don't always work at our own desks. A 5-10 meg profile doesn't seem that large, but in our case (old building, old/clunky LAN) it's too much to shove over the network each time we log on, so we have to manually set up a user profile on each computer. An encrypted card with our workspace and profile on it might make for a tidy solution and reduce network load even when we finally get our new LAN up and running someday, because we could take that card and load our profile anywhere even when away from the home office.

    It would need OS support and reasonably cheap hardware and you can't count on Microsoft to play ball unless they thought of it first, but the potential seems obvious.

  104. Oh, cool! by Shoten · · Score: 1

    Now I can upgrade to something better than my wonderful Replay drive! Oh, wait...uh...hm.

    --

    For your security, this post has been encrypted with ROT-13, twice.
  105. My thoughts exactly. by cryptochrome · · Score: 1

    Mod parent up.

    --

    ---If you can't trust a nerd, who can you trust?

  106. My nominee for "Vaporware of the year" by Forge · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yes it's only January but this looks like such a wonderful invention and at such a great price that it most likely dose not exist. I.e. It's probebly Vaporware.

    On the off chance that it is not I will personaly be buying some for "data archiving". (I.e. Pron Warehose.)

    --
    --= Isn't it surprising how badly I spell ?
  107. yeah, he's been bussy with other things. by Erris · · Score: 1
    Like the AI troll detector. When complete, it will recognize and exterminate self moderated, off topic personal insults and other garbage about spelling, grammar, duplicate stories, hot grits, insipid moderation, SOVIET RUSSIA, petrified what nots and all that jazz. Version 2 will determine the origin of said posts and write a story about how some big companies, China and others are paid to DoS slashdot with blather like this.

    In the mean time the rest of us will ignore the small details.

    --
    DMCA, Hollings, Palladium. What might have sounded like paranoia is now common sense.
  108. Oh Boy! by JesusHelper · · Score: 1

    Another peice of Vaporware!
    I am going to put this right next to my
    roll-out big screen tv and my hovercraft!

  109. Credit Card sized 5GB HD to arrive late this year by Blikbok · · Score: 2, Funny

    Of course it's going to be late! True news would be, "Really neat toy to arrive on scheduled release date." May even arrive early, says manufacturer. Industry shocked, film at 11.

  110. Nitpick here... by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

    Volatile is not the word you want to use here.

    If this were volatile, it would be almost useless. Volatile memory storage is defined as storage that doesn't retain data between power cycles. (i.e. all RAM , whether static or dynamic. NVRAM is a misnomer - It's just volatile RAM with a battery backup)

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  111. too late to be meaningful? by monkeyboy87 · · Score: 1

    At the low end 100mb, thats teh size of .zip discs today and at the upper end the size of a DVD. I just dont see a use for it if its going be connected via USB. most laptops have CD-R burners that give more than 100mb, dvd-RW or dvd+RW in laptops give the upper end of storage. my PDA has a SD slot that takes 512mb(i heard 1gb comming) and the CF can take a 1GB-2GB microdrive. most PDA's dont have usb or a reader so i'm not sure at whom this is targeted.

  112. Read beyond the pcworld article by Proneax · · Score: 2, Informative

    More info is available if you visit the company's website (which oddly isn't linked in the pcworld article).
    From the site:

    Storage capacity from 100MB to multi-gigabyte capacity* (in future generations).

    Also, in the slideshow it shows a graph of the product scaling from 100MB in 2003 to 1 gig in 2004 to 5 gigs in 2005, at a constant price of $15.

    So, they won't be selling high-priced large capacity drives, as they won't be available and when they are they will remain at the current pricepoint.

    I think this could have some usefull applications, depending on how well it is accepted and whether they can actually produce a product that scales as well as they say.

    1. Re:Read beyond the pcworld article by worthb · · Score: 1

      So really, this is nothing more than a 100MB Zip disk with a built in smart-card chip. Looking at the illustrations on the web-site, I don't see where the smart-chip really locks out access or autenticates the info on the disk. The smart-chip is only valid if the internal disk has not been modified or replaced.

      What would stop somebody from removing the Mylar disk and putting it inside of another case without a restrictive chip, or hacking the reader to ignore the chip. The smart-chip does not appear to control the interface, as the reader is external to the card. The smart-chip only appears to identify the media. Is it anything more than a storage device for encryption keys? How can it actually be performing encryption/decryption if the the reader is external. Maybe the reader is dumb and passes information from the external heads through the smart-chip and then back through the reader interface.

      Iomega could do the same thing with their Zip disks. They could even claim that in some future generation they will have 5GB capacity. That doesn't mean it will really happen. Personally I don't see anything to get excited about. If you want small media and access control, use Sony's memory stick thingy.

      --
      "the universal aptitude for ineptitude makes any human accomplishment an incredible miracle" - Stapp's Law
  113. and the cards for under $15 each by R_V_Winkle · · Score: 1

    I guess these guys haven't heard of dvdrw.
    Seriusly why would I want to spend 15$ for 5GB of sotrage that is only good with a special drive that has no other use besides storage. At about a dollar a blank and falling DVD-RW offer all the functionality of this product for a fraction of the cost and you can play movies in the drive, burn cdr, run programs etc...

    This does not sound too exciting to me with all the development going into holographic storage and the ability to archive terabytes onto state of the art media. 5gb is simply not enough to do very much anymore.

    1. Re:and the cards for under $15 each by shylock0 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but I imagine speed will be the real issue. If its a hard-disk style platter instead of an optical medium like DVD or CD, that'll make a huge difference. People continued to buy Zip drives and disks well after CDRs were popularized. Same reason. Having an easy read-write tech that doesn't have to be erased every time and is essentially drag-and-drop is a huge selling point for some people. Portability is just a plus -- as is price, in this case.

      --
      Statistically speaking, there's a 99.998% chance that my IQ is higher than yours. Get over it.
  114. Really cool! by Erris · · Score: 1

    That means that everyone will have access to everything! Just imagine the results of it. Everyone pays exactly what they should for health insurance, and insurance companies never lose money on an idividual again. Employers can chose exactly the right people without having to look at resumes. Blacklists will be perfect as no thoughts are hidden. Police will know I'm a model citezen, productive and alturistic. They could check my entire email history to make sure I'm not a terrorist too. Advertisers can adjust their messages just for me. I can just imagine listening to the billboards ask the woman next to me on the subway if she needs more herpes medicine or how she's feeling after the divorce. You might get fucked with information like that! The world would be so much better if little things like personal dignitiy and privacy would not get in the way of making a buck. There are so many great uses for a card that has DRM, so that others can control and read the content, but I can not. What are we waiting for? Put everything in your pocket, but don't forget the dead tree diary so you can write, "I hate big brother" where it won't see you. I hope they won't have my Slashdot posts.

    --
    DMCA, Hollings, Palladium. What might have sounded like paranoia is now common sense.
    1. Re:Really cool! by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

      Advertisers can adjust their messages just for me. I can just imagine listening to the billboards ask the woman next to me on the subway if she needs more herpes medicine or how she's feeling after the divorce

      Shelves your sarcasm and think about that.

      A simple market survey should show that breaching someone's privacy in an nondelicate manner would likely reduce sales of their product. And, thus, we're unlikely to have it happen more than a few times.

      OTOH, personalization of some purchases (like, for example, the waitress at a random Denny's I go to knowing what I've had before and being able to ask if I want the same thing or something new) is a good thing. Especially if it gets phased in via a "would you like us to remember your preferences?" model.

      Big Brother was bad because he lied. The check on that is open exchange of information--not lines of privacy and control which allow for lies and disinformation.

  115. Double the price in Canada by shking · · Score: 1
    The reader is expected to retail for under $100 and the cards for under $15 each

    The CPCC tariff will be $23.82 CDN ($15.50 US)

    I'm surprised nobody has made the connection with this story

    --
    -- "At Microsoft, quality is job 1.1" -- PC Magazine, Nov. 1994
  116. So What by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How is this any better then the 5 gig Toshiba pcmcia HD I got for $150? Ok maybe it's a little bit thinner, but other then that is there a big difference?

  117. Re:Why are you embarrased about your personal info by joshsisk · · Score: 1

    Not that I think the poster's predication will happen, but would you _really_ want to carry around all of your personal info with you? What happens if you get mugged? Or lose your wallet? Or get pushed into a swimming pool at a party?

  118. More relevant units by olijenkins · · Score: 1

    Shouldnt it be reported as 6.5K naked Britneys/Wallet^2

    Storage density

  119. Can you spell... by Sly+Mongoose · · Score: 1

    ...Vaporware?

    This, the digital "film" for standard 35mm cameras, and the /\d+/-gigabyte poker-chip drive are items you will never see.

  120. Cant be too reliable by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    With a Mylar disk, and such a thin form factor, they cant be expected to be too sturdy or last a long time..

    Plus there is no way 5gb will be 15bucks.. that the 100m version.. But that price isn't bad compared to ( much more reliable ) ZIP disks..

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:Cant be too reliable by josh+crawley · · Score: 2, Funny

      ---But that price isn't bad compared to ( much more reliable ) ZIP disks..

      I only need say 1 word to refute the "Reliablity of Zip disks".......

      Click.

  121. Real life example by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 1

    My chem teacher in high school was a retired navy captain. Went to Annapolis in the 30s I believe, maybe 1920s. Real fun guy. He said he and some other midshipmen put a big gyroscope in a suitcase, got out of a taxi in front of a hotel and aimed it for the front door, wound it up, walked straight in, set it down, got a room, and the bellhop picked the suitcase up to take it to their room, turned a corner, and fell down when his arm went flying up and he lost control. He described it much better than I can, quite a gleam in his eyes. He was quite a joker...

  122. a DRM that might work by spazoid12 · · Score: 1

    This one might work. Unlike CD protection systems that can be defeated with Sharpie pens.

    within the card is an on-board processor containing integrated software controls that can encrypt data securely in real time

    The logic to read the data on the card doesn't take place in your PC. It takes place in the reader. So, that's where the hacking has to take place. That is, hack the reader, or make your own reader. Which leads to the real practical nature of the DRM in this thing...the tiny size. It may be impractical to expect many hackers with regular soldering irons to work with something very small. But, I suspect it'll still be done. It'll likely be a hacked up reader that only needs to have a single resistor removed, or something goofy like that.

    If RIAA/MPAA really wants DRM that isn't defeatable (everything is theoretically defeatable...practice is another thing) then they need to promote technology that is too impractical and/or costly for people without sophisticated labs to deal with. Maybe a nanotechnology hard drive where nanobots manipulate molecules in a ball of jello the size of a marble.

    1. Re:a DRM that might work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      muahaha, you made another stinkin' dumb post that makes me shiver. can't the computer science schools 'n' colleges in your country teach you

      ONE stupid fact: If I can hear it, I can copy it.

      With CD prices going up higher than the avearage Ariane-5 rockets (they just keep exploding on their way up, actually) and entering stationary orbit at about 18-20USD/EUR, people (read: students, unemployed, kids) will go to ANY lengths trying to crack the protection. Watermarking and mandated Fritz-Chips would be the only remedies, but will piss off the HiFi-folk. After all, even soccer/minivan-moms and their husbands will try to copy their music, if they can't, they'd rather find someone who can, than to buy another medium with the same content they already own. People are sharing their media in ways that are deeply integrated in our culture. Human beings are used to sing, celebrate and enjoy events together since the days of the cavemen. The part of copying acts, technology and music from others is even older, dumb monkeys can commit patent /IP infringement to imitate one successful monkey mate and his banana-gathering tools. No amount of marketing or technologic or governmental pressure will change the need of people to hear their music and to watch their films at a friends place or to give their entertainment to them after they are through with it.

      The idea of making purely virtual things like music and ideas the sole property of a person or corporation is very ambiguous. The goal of some individuals to decrease an unlimited amount of ideas for their own benefits is nearly criminal. - But fortunately, the hope to create some thing that exports digital data but cannot be copied is so damn futile, it hurts my brains.

    2. Re:a DRM that might work by spazoid12 · · Score: 1

      wow!

      that was a great many words more than necessary to show that you don't understand the issues.

      while I did mention RIAA, in passing, I wasn't writing about music. so, who gives a dead porcupine what you will do to get low-quality cheesy recordings of music you didn't pay for.

      I'll finish your brilliant statement for you:
      If I can hear it, I can copy it...really really poorly

      What DRM strategies try to do is to make it so that the content is meaningless unless accessed through a proprietary system given the appropriate access. If the content is music, then outside of the system it would not be music but rather gibberish (something like your post). Through the system, it would be music. DVD does this (although it failed miserably). Supposing it did not fail, then it is only a movie once through the CSS system. But, you say, it does at some point become a movie...which you can then capture. Sure. Go ahead. Get yourself a recording that sucks as much as a copy of a VHS tape. That is exactly what you would be doing to capture the audio "if you can hear it".

      What I stated was that the protection system through which you access the content in a way that makes sense is not in your computer (like DVD), but in a very small hardware/software package. The size alone will limit the number of hackers able to work with the technology.

      But, you're right. Nothing will stop people from producing crappy copies.

      I'll bet you're quite excited when you get a low-grade copy of a movie that comes with a B&W photocopy of the CD cover! ooooooohhhh.

  123. Okay, so it's a floppy disk...? by Levine · · Score: 1

    I have to second an above poster's question. A mylar disc, in a credit card sized plastic vessel, with the read head and motor in the 'reader' (the 'floppy disk drive'), initially only at 100MB...

    Congratulations, you've re-engineered a LS120 disk to be slightly smaller and have its reader connect via USB.

    levine

  124. Yeah, like how well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    ... would this card-disk survive a trip thru the washing machine when I forget and leave one in my shirt pocket?

  125. Heaven for digital camera owners by James+Littiebrant · · Score: 1

    When a self-contained card reader/writer comes out for this media, digital camera owners could plug this into the USB port on the camera and download the pictures to the HDD. This is also far better than buying a $215 1GB compact flash card.

  126. This is great, BUT I'M ANNOYED!!! by greymond · · Score: 1

    Don't get me wrong. I have nothing agaist this company or any company who wants to make a new smaller (larger storage) media. But heres my problem right now.

    I have an Olympus Digital camera that uses Smartmedia, I have my Zaurus that uses an SD card (and CF), and I am using a Sandisk CF with PCMCIA Adapter on my Laptop (for MP3's at work).

    AND NOW theirs going to be YET ANOTHER type of media for me to use. I likehaving choice and all, but this is rediculous. I'd rather just have CF slots on everything and use the 1gig CompactFlash for everything. TOO MANY choices - equals a pain in the ass.

    You "I'm looking for...."
    Sales Man "Hay this would work great in your new Shindang"
    You "oh? Where does it go?"
    Sales Man "Well you need this adpater or you can just buy the new Shindandango"
    You "Great"

    In short - I like the idea of how Hardrives had increased in Storage capacity AND gone down in price, but they still fit the same slots :)

  127. Always in 3 quarters. by klang · · Score: 1

    Something like this ALWAYS comes out in $current_ quarter + 3.

    A Certified WaporWare Candidate

  128. SmartCard Compatability and Flexability by SirHalcyon · · Score: 1

    From the StorCard Technology page:

    The StorCard conforms to ISO 7816-1 (Smart Card standard) including mechanical flexibility along the longitudinal and transverse axis without damage to the IC or the magnetic recording medium. The communication protocol is per the standard Smart Card Interface (ISO 7816-2 & 3) and via a unique bus implemented in the StorReader. ISO 7816 communication speed is 9600 baud, while the StorReader supports a sustained data transfer rate of 5 megabytes per second in the 100 megabyte StorCard, and scales in the 5 gigabyte design.

    Looks like it is going to be smartcard compatable and adequately flexable.

  129. backup-o-rama by chrish · · Score: 1

    This will rock, assuming it's got the reliability that Castlewood's ORB drive lacks (the last "great" removable innovation).

    Anyone want to buy a mostly-dead ORB and handful of disks? :-\

    --
    - chrish
  130. everyone has their own 'standard' by slittle · · Score: 1

    It's called competition.

    Everyone should remember this the next time they feel the urge to crap on about monopolies.

    --
    Opportunity knocks. Karma hunts you down.
  131. Toshiba already has a 5Gb credit card sized drive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    it can use the ata interface or pc card interface

    http://www.toshiba.com/taissdd/products/features /M K5002mpl-Over.shtml

  132. All of it. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    At $15 a card, how much of our personal information will we be forced to carry around in our pockets?

    Change that to "could" and the answer becomes "all of it". B-(

    But who cares the size of the card? Ten decimal digits (plus a few for population growth and aliases) is enough for a unique identifier for everybody. With the cops wired they can access a government database of any desired size in real-time.

    So why put the info on a $15 card that YOU carry around with you - and potentially could read or even modify - when they could just give you a $0.02 piece of plastic with a number and have the same "benefits" (to them) without the "risks"?

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  133. Moving parts are... by Chirashi · · Score: 1

    so 1950's. I see no reason why in this day and age a computer should have any moving parts, except maybe a fan for cooling. This technology is not the future, I see something more along the lines of Compact Flash as the price comes down. I mean think about it, why does a hard drive need to consist of circular disks that rotate? It doesn't. It just seems like innovation has become stuck in a groove, like the record player technology that preceded this. Someone go and push the needle a little bit so we can move on.

  134. Only half right. by srvivn21 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Erm. Mylar is also what film (as in what goes through the projector at your local megaplex) headers are made of (the actual film is usually polyester).

    Some speakers have their active surface made of Mylar.

    Light, yes. Flimsy, not necessarily.

    1. Re:Only half right. by SuperQ · · Score: 1

      Better example of a mylar speaker driver is Magnepan

      http://www.magnepan.com

      They use a sheet of mylar with aluminum ribon on it.

      Great speakers.. fairly sturdy.. but the mylar does wear out over time.. I've talked to several magnepan people who have said 5-10 year lifespan on the sheet driver, and you have to have a new sheet put on. Aleast it's not expensive to replace.

    2. Re:Only half right. by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      Actually, the WHOLE movie is on Mylar(r). Mylar(r) is DuPont's registered trademark for a polyester film. poop here on mylar being polyester film, and poop here on its use in photographic/movie/audio tape/film

  135. storage vapor? by osgeek · · Score: 1

    This is like right on the borderline between being a possible product, and being yet another vapor storage product scam.

    The line about its being as durable as a regular credit card seems like BS. If you've got a moving spindle in there, it's not going to be very good at handling being flexed.

    I'll believe it when I see it.

  136. think about this by Erris · · Score: 1
    A person I know worked the phones of a debt collector. She was able to look through the records for debts owed by people she knew. One of those people had a medical debt, and she was able to tell what procedure the debt was for. Like a dumb-ass, she used the information to humiliate her friend.

    Privacy violation is already real and there is nothing delicate about it. When the information is available, it will be abused.

    --
    DMCA, Hollings, Palladium. What might have sounded like paranoia is now common sense.
    1. Re:think about this by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

      Privacy violation is already real and there is nothing delicate about it. When the information is available, it will be abused.

      Exactly. But the cure for this is not to remove the information -- it is to make the abuse nearly impossible to conceal.

      You (and I and everyone else) should live your life such that, if all your secrets became known, you could keep on living your life.

  137. Slashdot story headline fixer by SomeOtherGuy · · Score: 1


    I know Redundent, But:

    %s/Credit Card sized 5GB HD to arrive late this year/Credit Card sized 100MB HD to arrive late this year/g

    5 Gig maybe in 2005 if the company is one of the .5 percent that survives longer than their 1 year subscription to the WSJ AND the 5 GB is not just marketing bait (or /. headline bait).

    --
    (+1 Funny) only if I laugh out loud.
  138. latex, not LaTeX, you geeks by f1a8oy · · Score: 1

    Sure, they're flexible, but what happens when I have a condom ring imprint in my StorCard?

    --
    Man the poets down here don't write nothing at all, they just stand back and let it all be.
    -Springsteen
  139. DUCK! by jbrelie · · Score: 1

    Because the MPAA/RIAA lawyers are going to have a hayday with this.

  140. Zipzilla by Dark+Bard · · Score: 2, Funny

    Has anyone else caught the fact it sounds like a really big Zip drive. Does anyone else remember the joys of zip drive ownership? Your data is about as safe as a fresh baked pie on a windowsill at a fat farm.

  141. how useful are these? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    so i have a few questions:

    i do a lot of music recording with computers, so could these drive work well for that type of application? is it usb 1.1 or usb 2.0? what is the sustain throughput? I mean if these things work like normal fast hardrive then they would be a god send to teh music recording community. And since they are usb connected, can they be setup in a raid fassion to allow for multi-track recordings?

  142. Re:Video use by RadioTV · · Score: 1

    I agree with your numbers, but DVDs aren't HDTV. HDTV is 720 vertical lines minimum. DVDs are 480 lines.

    --
    I have great faith in fools - self confidence my friends call it. - Edgar Allan Poe
  143. cheap, thin, flexible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wouldn't that make it a "floppy" disk then. They weren't always 1.44 MB, so I don't think size is what determines the name.

  144. another dataplay in the make? by u19925 · · Score: 1
    what are we seeing, another dataplay.com in the making? dataplay had 500 MB capacity, costs $5, it is smaller than credit card and still failed. IOmega has 40 MB click drive which is another failure. Sanyo, Olympus etc had PhotoId, slightly bigger than credit card, had 200 MB (or so), cost about $5-$10, still failed. Ofcourse, there were many others: superdisk (i have one), minidisc (i bought and returned). it seems that 9 out of 10 new tiny storage devices are failing because they are non-standard, closed, proprietary architecture being launched prematurely by often underfunded companies. Even mighty Sony has closed down memory stick (replaced with incompatible memory stick pro), smart media has stalled at 128 MB. MMC cards are on decline. mini-dvd, mini-cd sales are dismal.

    When are these storage companies going to learn lesson, that they need to cooperate, need good standard, broad industry support for a new device to succeed? So far the most successful is CompactFlash, CD, floppy and DVD. Not necessarily anyone of them is due to technical superiority alone (except CD. they were technically way ahead of any alternative available then). CF succeeded due to PCMCIA compatibility. DVD had its share of success due to CD compatibility (not many people would have bought DVD drive in their computer, if that couldn't play CDs). Floppies had huge industry support.

  145. HD ? I think not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lets see - a thin mylar platter spinning inside a thin envelope. Not very hard, is it? Wouldn't it be more appropriate to call that a floppy disk?

  146. Another dataplay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It will actually take 3 years, cost too much and deliver only half of the capacity.

  147. This looks familiar by Eil · · Score: 1


    Has anyone noticed yet that these are not 5GB hard disks, but by definition classify as floppy disks? This has been too long in coming. Hope they're not prohibitively expensive like ZIP disks are.

  148. Shouldn't it be floppy disk card? by fernd1 · · Score: 1

    Ok this thing has a Mylar disk right? Well that's what floppies have. A Floppy disk is made from a plastic film which is Mylar. This is covered in a thin layer of a magnetic material. With 3.5" it is incased in a hard plastic shell. This card has a hard plastic shell, sure the article also said that the card had integrated circuitry for encryption, but that doesn't make it a hard drive. SO.... the real question is what technology are they using to squeeze that much data onto a mylar disk that is smaller than the Mylar disk in a floppy drive.

  149. StorReader - But what about writing??? by Ssolstice · · Score: 1

    I've not poured over the entire website or related articles, but the "StorReader" for under $100 sounds a bit fishy. Will we need a seperate device for writing data to these little disks?

  150. Also, as recently seen on the BBC: by uradu · · Score: 1

    No Time To Lose!
    No-time Toulouse!

  151. Hasn't this been done? by moosesocks · · Score: 1

    Don't we have 20gb PCMCIA hard drives already? While they're not exactly as THIN as a credit card, they're pretty darn close. FYI, Apple uses PCMCIA hard drives in their iPods.

    If the $100 price is only for the 100mb version, you're better off getting a USB disk-on-key.

    --
    -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
  152. RAID 5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just have a RAID 5 reader/drive. Have 10-20 of these to get 50-100GB for now and I'm sure more in the future.

    They appear to use less electricity so that would be a plus over my 3/80GB HD RAID 5 in my server.

  153. Re:Huge Storage,Small,Cheap - Reminds me of DataPl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, for that matter anyone rememer the quarter sized hard drive in several men's magazines a couple years ago that were gonna make the "personal computer" into a wearable form? What happened to those cause i wanna make a computer in a luchbox and still have room for my lunch!

  154. sat on it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Awh crap... I forgot to remove my wallet before
    sitting down!

  155. if it sounds too good to be true... by xo0m · · Score: 1

    ...it probably is :(

  156. Re:Huge Storage,Small,Cheap - Reminds me of DataPl by be-fan · · Score: 1

    Actually, dataplay was just fine technically. I've got one sitting right next to me and it works great. They're really tiny, and the really do hold 500MB. It's the DRM crap that killed it.

    --
    A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
  157. Thanks for the link. by srvivn21 · · Score: 1

    Thanks. I was in a rush, and posted one of the first links that Google came up with for "Mylar Speaker". :o)

  158. it's a really small bernoulli! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    all over again. but smaller, and higher capacity. cool. those things were indestructible.

  159. Don't know about you... by Captain_Stupendous · · Score: 1

    ...but this sounds a lot like a floppy drive to me. Requires a reader ( = Drive), into which you insert your "card" ( = disk).

    --


    I am alone, yet I also surf the universal backwash of undifferentiated Being, which is LOVE.
  160. I wonder which is actually cheaper, this or flash by aquarian · · Score: 1

    I wonder which is actually cheaper to make, this or flash memory. We can get CF cards of at least 1GB now, maybe 2GB. The new Fuji/Olympus flash format (XD?) will supposedly surpass CF. It seems to me that flash memory, with no moving parts, etc., would be cheaper to make, not to mention more robust, and faster. So I wonder what this thing is really all about -- DRM, maybe? Big profits from selling the little reader things?

  161. magnets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "honey I stuck your smartcard on the fridge with the bills"

    @$%#!

  162. Re:The NeXT ANYTHING by trevinofunk · · Score: 1

    What about this built into a celphone-pda. I've always said that I would buy one of those when they get at least 5 megs of storage for MP3's. This would help reduce techno-clutter, and make life a little easeir

  163. OT: DVD-18 Issues by Nexx · · Score: 1

    Obviously, their answer for a 3+ hour movie was to use a crappy bitrate rather than use DVD-18 ( Double-sided, dual-layered ) or two dual-layered discs.

    But the *perceived* marketing problem with using two dual-layered discs is that the viewer will have to get up and switch discs in the middle of the movie. Of course, you can alleviate this with a multi-dvd jukebox.

    The bigger question I have is about the DVD-18. Can most players read both sides of the DVD-18 without having the user physically flip the disc?

  164. What Next? by The+Keyer · · Score: 1

    Once you have this in all your cards what next? Keys? Soon your wallet will be too heavy to carry. Not very Efficent. Might as well use your laptop now.

  165. costly to repair by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    imagine the cost to repair or recover data from such a drive.

  166. No ID for drugs! by AnotherScratchMonkey · · Score: 0

    You shouldn't need to prove your medical condition to get drugs to treat it. Competent people should be treated like adults and allowed to make informed decisions about their own bodies, without government interference. (The incompetent shouldn't be allowed to leave home in the first place.)

  167. Sounds Like A... by detritus. · · Score: 1

    Sound like the Quantum Bigfoot version of the microdrive, IMHO.

  168. Re:Big enough for DVD (RTFLA) by UnixRevolution · · Score: 1

    Read the FSCKing Linked Article:

    StorCard promises the tiny hard drive will provide high performance to quickly handle large amounts of data. It will support a volume sufficient to stream media files, for example, according to Heil. As a result, the StorCard could store even material that previously would fit only on a DVD.

    that comes straight from the article.

    --
    You like your new Mac more than you like me, don't you, Dave? Dave? I asked...She said Yes.
  169. Re:Video use by bdeclerc · · Score: 1
    DVDs aren't HDTV

    I know, what I meant was DVD-quality at HDTV resolutions...
  170. Re:Credit Card sized 5GB HD to become late this ye by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is this a multiple choice type thing? if it is, i'm complaining about the options. theres no "cmdrtaco is a wanker" there.

  171. But...but... by kcb93x · · Score: 1

    "Some of the bills were ON my smart card!"

    Oh fscking @$%#!

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  172. Freedom by Legal · · Score: 1
    The constant trend of miniaturization and a move to higher-capacity media (storage, bandwidth, etc.) are truly making privacy issues something that requires a real debate.

    The main point has IMHO not been raised in this thread, although infrequently discussed on these pages before: Should you not have a say in how your personal information is used? Should information on everything about you and your life be out of your control? I suggest that the question is not about whether you lead an impeccable life, and should therefore not worry about others learning your secrets, or not. No, the question is, should you not be free, to some degree, to decide for yourself what of your personal information is disseminated and to whom? Should you not have the basic right to live free from prying eyes, to some 'reasonable' level, if you so choose?

    Ultimately, is privacy not a human right? This is the pressing question, and it begs an answer.

  173. What's with appealing to the DRM pushers? by Effugas · · Score: 1

    I don't really get it. You've got a couple companies with a shit-ton of cash, none of which they want to give to you. (Promises, sure. They'll blow smoke up your ass about you being the next DVD format all day. But cash? No.) Or you've got a shit-ton of people with no shortage of cash, who wont give you the time of day if you pay attention to the aforementioned companies, but who will be more than happy to rain lots of money upon you if you give sell them what they would like to buy.

    I mean, it's not like this story hasn't been played out before. Look at Dataplay. Gigabyte on a quarter. Tech's out now. Wrapped up in DRM.

    DOA.

    More CD-R's will be purchased in the next thirty seconds than Dataplay discs will be before they're pulled off the market. They wish I was exaggerating.

    Seems to me that all DRM buys you is bankruptcy...

    Yours Truly,

    Dan Kaminsky
    DoxPara Research
    http://www.doxpara.com

  174. Re:Video use by RadioTV · · Score: 1

    The thing is HDTV is normally ~19Mbps. I can be done with less (I have seen it as low as 12), but compression artifacts start becoming substantial.

    --
    I have great faith in fools - self confidence my friends call it. - Edgar Allan Poe
  175. Read only -- a haven for RIAA? by tgrigsby · · Score: 1

    That's neat and all, but when do they expect to come with a *writer*? CDs didn't really become useful to me until I could write them myself.

    On the other hand, if this is a medium that requires a lot of special hardware to write the card information, it wouldn't surprise me to see music being released on these. Wouldn't that be a natural progression for the RIAA? If the bought the rights to this technology, then only released drivers that did output straight to the speakers, they could control how easy it is to copy the music. Yeah, sure, you could run the output to another computer input and record the music, but the digital to analog to digital conversion will degrade the quality of the recording, etc., etc.

    Music and video equipment manufacturers would jump on the bandwagon looking for some reason to convince consumers to dump those out of date, bulky DVD readers and step up to the new and improved Card Readers. Selling point: you could fit the [insert favority group here]'s entire collection onto a single card!

    --
    *** *** You're just jealous 'cause the voices talk to me... ***
  176. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 0

    A certain monk had a habit of pestering the Grand Tortue (the only one who
    had ever reached the Enlightenment 'Yond Enlightenment), by asking whether
    various objects had Buddha-nature or not. To such a question Tortue
    invariably sat silent. The monk had already asked about a bean, a lake,
    and a moonlit night. One day he brought to Tortue a piece of string, and
    asked the same question. In reply, the Grand Tortue grasped the loop
    between his feet and, with a few simple manipulations, created a complex
    string which he proferred wordlessly to the monk. At that moment, the monk
    was enlightened.

    From then on, the monk did not bother Tortue. Instead, he made string after
    string by Tortue's method; and he passed the method on to his own disciples,
    who passed it on to theirs.

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...