Slashdot Mirror


Negative Effects of Workplace Net Monitoring

Masem writes "Business2.com reports that while many corporations have monitoring tools and restrictions on Internet usages for non-work related activities, these can have negative effects on the productivity of the workplace. The report notes that people have to take days off from work to deal with personal business that could have been done in a few minutes or hours from a work net connection, and that employee morale is generally down when net controls are in place." A related study suggests employees spend more time doing work from home than playing at work.

376 comments

  1. Admit it! by sulli · · Score: 4, Funny

    You're commenting on this AT WORK.

    --

    sulli
    RTFJ.
    1. Re:Admit it! by CharlieO · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes but as I'm at work OUTSIDE OF THE HOURS I'M PAID FOR I figure fairs fair.

    2. Re:Admit it! by Otter · · Score: 1
      Yeah, I find it hard to get too worked up on this subject given that I ought to be working right now...

      On a related subject, the BBC reports that the new email filtering system at the House of Commons is blocking mail containing Welsh, apparently mistaking benign Welsh content for English obscenities.

    3. Re:Admit it! by Milo+Fungus · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yeah, but you're still using company bandwidth. I don't write my Slashdotting hours on my timecard, but I'm still consuming company property for personal use. I have mixed feelings about the ethics of Slashdotting on work computers. I work in tech, so in a way I'm just keeping on top of recent developments. I also work for a university that I attend as a student, so really the bandwidth is mine to use as a student if not as an employee. But these are questions we should consider when we catch ourselves mindlessly reloading Slashdot ten times/hour.

    4. Re:Admit it! by chef_raekwon · · Score: 1

      so,....if Im the one who implements the controls, is it wrong for me to post??

      --
      We're like rats, in some experiment! -- George Costanza
    5. Re:Admit it! by BrookHarty · · Score: 3, Funny

      Amen, I know I put my 40 hours in by wednesday. Let me have my 10 minutes to read Slashdot.

    6. Re:Admit it! by onepoint · · Score: 5, Informative

      I own a tiny shop, I require everyone to read slashdot 3 times a day for 20 minutes each. ( 1 hour total ).

      Why, real simple, knowledge equals growth. I spend 2 years lurking, just learning. I got to say slashdot gives the best education for every stupid line you write.

      Plus the shared knowledge of the community gives me the edge up on others. So, yes, slashdot should be a required reading at all firms that are in the tech field.

      Onepoint

      --
      if you see me, smile and say hello.
    7. Re:Admit it! by ottffssent · · Score: 1

      Nah; I'm commenting from class.

      Actually, I'm surprised at the lack of laptops in class. The CS building here has wireless, as do the unions and a half-dozen other buildings on campus, but even in the hard-core CS/ECE classes there are only 1-2 people with laptops. I would think it would be very useful to call up your CPU design while the professor is talking about different FP divider circuits and have a look.

    8. Re:Admit it! by Iffy+Bonzoolie · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, I have to say... the amount of Slashdot-viewing I did at my last job was inversely proportional to my morale. At the end, my morale was pretty low, I was starting to feel guilty. I think I spent more time on /. than doing actual work. That's when I knew it was time to quit!

      But, in reasonable amounts, I think it's fair for any tech worker to keep up on Star Wars news on the job. I mean, we aren't ANIMALS!

      -If

      --
      Run a pencil-and-paper RPG campaign with your far-off friends: Gametable!
    9. Re:Admit it! by Space_Nerd · · Score: 1

      That only applies if you are actually being PAID to work ;-)

      I know, i'm rather bitter today

      --
      Everybody has a purpose in life, maybe mine is to lurk in slashdot.
    10. Re:Admit it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, animals are loved, fed and well treated. They are sheltered and given medical care. You, as an American worker, are lower, much much lower than an animal. Doncha LOVE AMERIKKKA? GGOOOOODDD BLESS AMERIKKAKAKKA!! Whatever happens, it's NOT CAPITALISM'S FAULT! OH NO NO ON OOO!!

    11. Re:Admit it! by Dudio · · Score: 3, Funny

      I thought it was the other way around...

    12. Re:Admit it! by cygnusx · · Score: 4, Funny

      > So, yes, slashdot should be a required reading at all firms that are in the tech field.

      So, folk at your shop are the local expert on hot grits and goat-rutting?

    13. Re:Admit it! by Rojo^ · · Score: 1
      which one is the "any" key
      I believe you will find it here.

      =)
      --
      <:
    14. Re:Admit it! by Joe+U · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's not that you are using their resources, it's that they are also using your personal resources as well.

      Do you submit a bill to your company for your home bandwidth charges when you check your work email at home or when you connect in remotely on your day off? Even if you charge by the hour, what about your computer costs? Electric? Heat and A/C?

    15. Re:Admit it! by Christianfreak · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So is it also unethical to take time to go to the restroom or get a drink of water?

      Seriously most companies have broadband connections, how much bandwidth are you really using?

      I agree it can become a problem if that is all you are doing, but how can an employer complain if I get my work done in a timely manner and read up alittle on technology, news, whatever on the side? Arguably it would take longer to do my work if I don't get breaks and I would certainly be much less happy if I couldn't take that time and surf a bit.

    16. Re:Admit it! by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What is this "timecard" that you speak of?

      Salary = No hours, no overtime. Just get the work done.

      I get paid the same if I work a 30 hour week or a 70 hour week. If it's the latter, you'll be damn sure that I will be taking many breaks.

      --
      "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
    17. Re:Admit it! by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      People need breaks. Reading and making a couple of posts to /. hardly effects thier bandwidth. They're paying for it whether you use it or not. Looking at some webpages won't hurt you employers bottom line; in fact, it may help it.

    18. Re:Admit it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      So is it also unethical to take time to go to the restroom or get a drink of water?

      Depends.

    19. Re:Admit it! by mindstrm · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Except that in many places, salary ends up meaning "We don't have to pay you more when you work overtime, even if state law requires it, cause you'll anger us and lose your job, and you have to be here 50 hours a week ANYWAY, becuase that's part of doing your job."

    20. Re:Admit it! by ignorant_newbie · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You're right, your IM and slashdot reading and occasional song download isn't taking that much bandwidth. it's everyone's at your location that takes the bandwidth.

      My office has a T1, and between the hours of 9 and 5, my averate throughput from ibiblio is 12kps. I could do better with a 28.8 modem. as soon as everyone goes home, i can get 160kps. -- and we've already blocked all the popular p2p ports.

    21. Re:Admit it! by t0ny · · Score: 1
      I agree. If you can filter out the tons of nonsense statements, brainless antagonism, and downright rabid stupidity of the posters on Slashdot, dealing with merely braindead customers should be a walk in the park.

      Human Resource and Customer Support people should also be allowed time to surf fuckedcompany.com's message base. That is pretty much the same problems as /.'s message base, but throw in swearing, racism, and blatent trolling.

      --

      Manipulate the moderator system! Mod someone as "overrated" today.

    22. Re:Admit it! by cheezedawg · · Score: 1

      Education? I thought it was indoctrination.

      --
      "The defense of freedom requires the advance of freedom" - George W Bush
    23. Re:Admit it! by BryanL · · Score: 2, Funny

      "I have mixed feelings about the ethics of Slashdotting on work computers."

      Mixed feelings about a participating in a massive DDOS?

    24. Re:Admit it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone reading enough Slashdot to have a measurable impact on a university's bandwidth has bigger problems than mere ethical connundrums.

    25. Re:Admit it! by Mr.+Bad+Example · · Score: 1

      So, folk at your shop are the local expert on hot grits and goat-rutting?

      Hey, be fair. They're also the area experts on PnP technology.

      (By which, of course, I mean petrified Natalie Portman...)

    26. Re:Admit it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you're learning to not think before you open your big fat arse and spoot out an opinion based on an equally wobbly-facts post by someone who also managed to slam GWB no matter what the thread topic, then?

      Wonderful. That's all we need in this world is more cretins like the loudmouths at Slashdot.

      Just like all the useless weblogs out there, there's no debate here.. opposing opinions get shouted down posthaste, thanks to retarded moderators who use their points to suppress opinions they don't like rather than following the mod rules.

      You won't learn how to think for yourself by reading Slashdot, that's for damn sure.

    27. Re:Admit it! by gmack · · Score: 1

      My last office had a 10 mb fiber link and browsing and downloads for 30 people was cheap and remained below 512k on average, unfortunatly a single machine left with kazaa would jump the useage to 6mb.

      The office policy ended up banning p2p apps but left the machines free for personal use.

    28. Re:Admit it! by BrookHarty · · Score: 3, Funny

      I never said I was in Management!

    29. Re:Admit it! by cayenne8 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      In the market place today, why would anyone in the IT field work as a direct employee? There is NO such thing as company loyalty to the employee, nor job security. A W2 employee in many cases these days will be let go just as fast as a 1099 or contractor with an "S" corporation. I figure, hey, if the job security is the same, why not work as an indie. contractor...make MUCH more money...and you don't get bored with the same old job forever. Benefits aren't that much to pay for....for a 40 yr old male...medical is only like $3K annually...etc. Like I said...I figure if you're going to have the same job security (none) you might as well make the big $$'s and have fun with it...no more 'salary' for me....

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    30. Re:Admit it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do not know about where you work, but for our T1, we do not pay by the bit, so if there is no traffic on the pipe, we are paying for something that is not getting used...

      I have no problem using work bandwidth, as long as I do not impact in any way other users.

    31. Re:Admit it! by Lendrick · · Score: 1

      I dunno if +5 Informative is really an appropriate moderation for this post. Perhaps 6 Funnies and a Troll would be a bit more appropriate.

      Am I the only one seeing sarcasm here?

    32. Re:Admit it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Think about it... you're using up company property, which depreciates. So every second you're not actively working on your computer means that the company loses money for *nothing*. Since you're not at work on average 16 hours of the day, that's two-thirds of the day squandered and the company continually loses money because you're not hunched over your computer making the most of the company resources they have so generously bestowed upon you.

      Now quit reading this and get back to work, you unscrupulous pilferer!

    33. Re:Admit it! by rutledjw · · Score: 3, Funny
      I don't write my Slashdotting hours

      I do, it's under "research".

      --

      Computer Science is Applied Philosophy
    34. Re:Admit it! by rutledjw · · Score: 1
      Oh, it's not that bad. Set your threshold higher and you'll see better comments filtered in. Sure, there's karma whoring, but there are some intelligent people on this board. I'm not saying I'm one of them, BTW.

      Also, if you go with the more technical articles as opposed to the emotionally charged ones, there are more intelligent comments. I admit it though, even I get sucked into the flame throwing stories from time to time...

      --

      Computer Science is Applied Philosophy
    35. Re:Admit it! by John+Courtland · · Score: 1

      Heh, salary == the greatest scam ever.
      I was salaried once, never again. Those blood sucking leeches wanted me to work as many weekends as they could get, every time I put my foot down. My time is MY time and to hell if they don't hire enough people to do the job.
      Coincidentally, in the middle of my employment there, they got a new HR guy (DUN DUN DUUUUNNNNNN!). He came around with this new "policy" (subsequently named "the policy"), and its main purpose was to basically fire me. When I didn't turn it in right away 'cause I wanted to look it over, he asked why I would need to look at it (!), and quickly xeroxed me a fresh copy to sign while he stood over me. (I do believe this was coercion). Needless to say, my reading slashdot on company time suddenly became frowned upon and within 2 days I was quickly escorted out.
      This is the same guy who, even though I was salaried, and worked my ass off while I was there, complained when I took one of my breaks with lunch, and left 15 early for my other break. This made it look like I was ditching out 15 early, so he was upset that I wasn't putting in my full 8 hours. This guy single-handedly screwed the atmosphere of that company. Thank god they fired me, that was the catalyst to get me out of that area all together.

      --
      Slashdot is proof that Sturgeon's Law applies to mankind.
    36. Re:Admit it! by vsprintf · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but you're still using company bandwidth.

      No, I'm not. When I work from home, I'm using a DSL connection that I pay for. Be careful of your assumptions.

    37. Re:Admit it! by macdaddy357 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes, I am. I am a computer technician waiting for diagnostic tests to complete. During these down times I do not just sit here, I read Slashdot, Fark, F'edCompany, and general news sites to pass the time. I need to occupy myself to maintain my sanity. If they took away my net access, and I had to just sit and twiddle my thumbs during these times, I would lose my mind! I could not do this job. I use a personal firewall and privacy software to get away with this, and I naturally minimize or close Mozilla if a boss comes near my bench. Don't we all?

      --
      How ya like dat?
    38. Re:Admit it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe if you didn't take so many breaks, it wouldn't be a 70 hour week. ;)

    39. Re:Admit it! by C0LDFusion · · Score: 1

      Unethical, yes. Against the rules? Probably not.

      --
      Only in slashdot are posts of solidarity modded at -1 Redundant, while posts of antagonism are modded as -1 Flamebait.
    40. Re:Admit it! by SN74S181 · · Score: 1
      In the market place today, why would anyone in the IT field work as a direct employee?


      You know, you're right.

      People would have to be nuts to work at an IT job for the company they actually work at. So people just plain refuse.

      And that's why there are so many open jobs in IT right now. So many that IT people looking for work are sorta developing a prima-donna attitude lately.

      (you'd better be able to figure out I am being sarcastic.)
    41. Re:Admit it! by schmink182 · · Score: 2, Informative
      I naturally minimize or close Mozilla if a boss comes near my bench.

      Try Ghostzilla. Makes it almost impossible to tell when you're surfing.

    42. Re:Admit it! by thestu · · Score: 2, Funny

      Of course I am. Oh, whoops.. I work out of my house ... well... I guess I need to monitor myself and make sure that I don't do any non work related browsing 24x7 then. ;)

    43. Re:Admit it! by iabervon · · Score: 1

      Bandwidth isn't a consumable resource, in general. As long as the company isn't needing to buy more bandwidth to support people's browsing habits or having problems with running out of bandwidth for real work, they don't incur any incremental cost from your browsing.

      If you want to think about personal use of company property, just think how much rent the company pays to store your junk while you're not working...

    44. Re:Admit it! by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1
      Salary = No hours, no overtime. Just get the work done.

      Yep, corporate slavery seems to be the accepted norm in some parts of the world.

      Too bad. Some of us have a 37.5 hour week written into our contracts (this is pretty normal in the UK) and expect to work something approximating that amount of time (less normal, but I've never had a problem doing so). Strangely, we seem to get at least as much done as the people who work 60+ hour weeks, perhaps because for all of our 37.5 hours we're actually doing useful work, and not undoing the ****-ups we made in hours 8-12 of yesterday.

      Of course, it takes a smart company to realise that extra hours does not equal extra profit, and a very smart one to actually force its employees to take breaks, holidays, etc. Few companies are that smart. (But those that are tend to be both nice places to work and very successful.)

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    45. Re:Admit it! by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1
      I use a personal firewall and privacy software to get away with this, and I naturally minimize or close Mozilla if a boss comes near my bench. Don't we all?

      Thankfully, no. I have finally found a company that views its people as valuable assets and treats them accordingly. Both my interviewers when I was first applying got the reference to being karma-capped on slashdot, and I read it quite happily at my desk (my team leader/boss sitting at the one right behind me in an open plan office).

      I don't take the piss by surfing on company time, and they're quite happy for me to read /. at lunch, or even <shock> surf during business hours to find useful information!

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    46. Re:Admit it! by Zog+The+Undeniable · · Score: 1
      Well, my company has an 8MBit leased pipe and we don't pay per MB, so they're not bothered about personal use provided it doesn't interfere with work.

      What does annoy me is the filtering technology they use, which blocks the nasty stuff but also blocks quite a lot of relatively innocent but funny stuff like b3ta.com (which claims to be "safe for work") - even from the on-site cybercafe which is there for use during breaks!

      --
      When I am king, you will be first against the wall.
    47. Re:Admit it! by humblecoder · · Score: 1

      I don't agree that consulting is obviously a better route. Last year I was in a situation where I was looking for a new job, so I was actually considering the question of consulting vs. full-time. What you are saying about consulting being more lucrative doesn't seem to be true in my case. Unless you have skills in a particularly obscure tech, the hourly rates nowadays seem to be pretty paltry. If you factor in things like benefits and self-employment taxes, things look much worse for consulting.

      As far as your argument that consultants have more mobility and won't get bored with the same old job, I totally disagree. One big downside of being a consultant is that you have to sign a contract which binds you to the job for a length of time. That was a BIG reason why I didn't take a particular consulting job. As I mentioned above, the hourly rate was okay but not spectacular, so I really wanted the flexibility to grab a better opportunity if and when things started to pick up. When you work as a salaried employee, you usually aren't working under a contract. So if you start to get bored for whatever reason, you can leave whenever you want (although 2 weeks notice is usually customary).

      I know you can probably negotiate an "escape clause" in your contract, but I'm sure the company will want something in return for agreeing to it.

      From what I can tell, working full time gives you just as much money and benefits but without the contracts!

    48. Re:Admit it! by onepoint · · Score: 1

      well no, I really require it, infact becasue of something in /. oday I will be in NYC to see what it looks like and find the practical application of it. I might not be first, but I will learn how to apply it .

      onepoint

      --
      if you see me, smile and say hello.
  2. I would've had FP.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    ... but i'm playing solitaire at work.

    1. Re:I would've had FP.. by GimmeFuel · · Score: 1
      Install Trillian for instant messaging and you can have it download /.'s .rdf file to keep you updated of headlines. Unfortunately, it's only in the paid version, so you'll have to get it off a P2P program.



      Not to say you would ever use instant messaging or P2P at work, of course...

  3. Well, duh by wayward_son · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Another pointy haired boss policy. Treating professionals like children does lead to decreased productivity.

    1. Re:Well, duh by wayward_son · · Score: 1

      The key is whether the work gets done in a timely fashion or not, especially with salaried employees. There is a difference between goofing off occasionally and seriously wasting company time and resources.

    2. Re:Well, duh by plague3106 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      We still have them in ours. WE have a foosball table, xbox, and PS2. Yet our company continued growing while our completitors were going throuh layoff after layoff.

      We're treated like adults, and we act like adults. They provide games for us to play, we don't abuse them and get our work done.

      People LOVE working here, and because of the extra mile our employer goes for us, we are willing to go the extra mile for them.

    3. Re:Well, duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think you can generalize here:

      I worked with a non-profit organization in Denver for several years (contract work; web and various network needs). They started with an internal mail system that hardly anyone used. After I installed their ISDN (two channel) the interest started to increase (standard e-mail, a few people using web browsers).

      After their big pipe was installed (fairly substantial DSL line) the crap that was installed on each system was just scary (e.g. every fricken 'net radio client, anything to exponentially increase a startup sequence). The bandwidth was stomped out in less than a week (totally pegged from that point forward; their own website couldn't be accessed) and I could totally see the changes occurring at each board meeting. When restrictions were proposed, they became *very* angry, and that idea was thrown out.

      There are definitely solutions to this, maybe they could've resolved it. All I'm saying is that not every business has a bunch of savvy Slashdot types ;-) You have a significant portion of people that will get totally lost when exposed to that evil Internet thing..

    4. Re:Well, duh by JudgeFurious · · Score: 1

      It's easy enough to have controls in place without damaging the morale of the employees overall and without going overboard. Here it's pretty much open season on internet use with the sole exception of keeping people off of the porn. Still about three or four times a year we have to pull someone aside and tell them to leave that stuff for when they are surfing at home.

      Less often we have to actually speak with someones supervisor when those "just between us" warnings go unheaded. Probably no more than once a year.

      --
      Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
  4. Ouch. by grub · · Score: 1, Insightful

    If my workplace ever started filtering /. I'd be fux0r3d.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:Ouch. by EverStoned · · Score: 1

      Proxies. My school filters out most sites, even MSN. Find yourself a nice proxy, and keep on /.ing

    2. Re:Ouch. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can always set up a VPN with a ssh tunnel to your linux box at home, running squid as your proxy. That way you can surf (much faster) than through the work proxy...and not be monitored...or blocked.

    3. Re:Ouch. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In SOVIET AMERICA slashdot filters you!

      Seriously, i can't get to slashdot from my work, but not because my employer bans slashdot, but because slashdot bans my employer.

    4. Re:Ouch. by essdodson · · Score: 1

      That just means you'll have to return to IRC! Traitor!

      --
      scott
  5. Duh! is the only appropriate response by puzzled · · Score: 4, Informative



    I was the porno cop at a 150 employee telecom company a few years ago. Highly paid programmers with tight deadlines turned out to have ... other interests and not much real work. An executive who had netted the company several sexual harrasment suits slid through on his corporate position and a difficult to replace provisioning guy continued to http://www.imustlotto.com.

    At the end of the day, two people left before the ax swung, the sexual harrasment was institutional and only slightly blunted ... but everyone and I mean every last person ... hated me with a passion for being the messenger.

    3% - 5% in any company are going to have some sort of problem and it ought to be dealt with on a performance basis rather than using a squid enforced police state.

    --
    I am very easy to get along with, but I don't have time to waste being nice to people who are being stupid. -Theo
    1. Re:Duh! is the only appropriate response by macrom · · Score: 4, Funny

      rather than using a squid enforced police state

      Man, that is harsh, using tentacled sea creatures to discipline employees. Throwing squid into my cube everytime I hit a porn site^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^HSlashdot would get me to stop. Hell, any raw fruits de mer would succeed.

      Now if you're employees like calamari, well, you're screwed.

    2. Re:Duh! is the only appropriate response by dr_dank · · Score: 5, Funny

      it ought to be dealt with on a performance basis rather than using a squid enforced police state.

      I, for one, welcome our calamari overlords.

      *ducks*

      --
      Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
    3. Re:Duh! is the only appropriate response by anon*127.0.0.1 · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, what are the legal implications of an employee using his high speed connection at work to surf for kiddy porn? Or traffic in pirated software, or make drug deals, or whatever. If you think a few employees playing solitaire hurts productivity, wait until the FBI shows up and confiscates every computer in the place, plus all the backups, and holds onto them for five years. Then you'll have a real productivity bottleneck.

      If I was going to put a corporate policy in place, I'd probably try to find some outside company to do the monitoring. It's too easy for someone inside the company to abuse their position.

      --
      I am NOT a man!
      I am a free number!
    4. Re:Duh! is the only appropriate response by antibryce · · Score: 3, Funny
      I, for one, welcome our calamari overlords.


      Not me. I voted for Kodo.

    5. Re:Duh! is the only appropriate response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "...what are the legal implications of an employee using his high speed connection at work to surf for kiddy porn? Or traffic in pirated software, or make drug deals, or whatever"

      If I ever get caught, I'll let you know

    6. Re:Duh! is the only appropriate response by NetFu · · Score: 5, Informative

      The only way I can respond to this post is, "Well, DUH!" I've worked for a 150 person company for 12 years as the I.T. Director, so we've always joked that my unwritten title has been "Director of Covert I.T. Operations".

      The bottom line is that, yes, this should be dealt with on a performance basis, but what do you do when you realize that an employee is underperforming? Do you just give them a warning that they are not performing at the level you expect them to? Or, do you turn to these tools for that individual to prove that they are wasting huge amounts of company time (at least to the manager, if not to the HR department and the employee himself)?

      That's what we have always done and it has generally been effective without causing ill-will from employees. If you hire someone to do a job, and they are not doing that job, then you need to somehow show why if you intend to fire them (at least here in California, I don't know if you can just fire people for no reason in other states) or even if you just want them to do a better job. Also, there is NO employee I've ever met who likes the extra workload because they have to work with someone they know is screwing off while they are working hard.

      Nobody gets pissed off when you fire jerks who refuse to do their work. Believe me, there are plenty of people out there who seriously think it's OK to talk on the phone ALL DAY (I'm talking 4-8 hours non-stop) while they work, and screwing off on the internet in IM, porno sites, Hotmail, etc. is no different. There will always be people who will abuse their freedoms at work and we have to use tools case-by-case to weed them out.

      Aside from people who can't get their jobs done, we have always given employees a lot of leeway on doing personal things during company time. Nobody cares that I'm posting this right now, and I don't care if other employees do things like this either, as long as they get their jobs done! Performance has to be king to keep everybody happy!

    7. Re:Duh! is the only appropriate response by filthyrash · · Score: 1

      I've seen this get out of hand. I was fired from a company for a number of pops the appeared when I went to a site. The pop ups were of a pornographic nature. No amount of explaining would convince them otherwise. As it was late and I was the only one in the office, I had no witness. After much legal wrangling I dropped it and just walked away. There is always this type of potential problem when content is not filtered at work. I'm all for letting employees surf as a stress reliever, but they must be protected against potential legal issues in the eveny they view something that is not in accordance with their policy.

    8. Re:Duh! is the only appropriate response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The VP of Engineering at one 60-person company I worked at would look at porn while at work. Which isn't THAT bad, except that he didn't have an office. We all just were set up on desks, and several of us had a direct view of his monitor without event turning our heads! I only really saw it once, and it was "after hours," but at our company at least half the company was still there (about 80% of engineering) "after hours."

      After he had left the company for other reasons, we tried to tell one of the other VPs about it, and he didn't believe us! Told us to stop spreading rumors...

    9. Re:Duh! is the only appropriate response by kenstcyr · · Score: 1

      Or in the words of a famous Mon Calamari:

      "It's a trap!"

      --
      "That machine has got to be destroyed...."
    10. Re:Duh! is the only appropriate response by Mr.+Bad+Example · · Score: 2, Funny

      [...]a squid enforced police state.

      Does this mean you'll be returning the company-issued iCephaloPod?

    11. Re:Duh! is the only appropriate response by Punk+Walrus · · Score: 1
      I was fired from a company for a number of pops the appeared when I went to a site. The pop ups were of a pornographic nature.

      Not to be snarky, but I have never browsed a web site with pornographic pop ups at work. In fact, even at home. Slashdot never gave me pr0npops.

    12. Re:Duh! is the only appropriate response by k_stamour · · Score: 1

      Mahi Mahi!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

      *hits the floor*

      --
      Julius Caesar - Act I, Scene i: "What mean'st thou by that? Mend me, thou saucy fellow!"
    13. Re:Duh! is the only appropriate response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      rather than using a squid enforced police state

      Man, that is harsh, using tentacled sea creatures to discipline employees.

      Next thing you know, they'll bring in Cthulhu to handle their "terminations".

    14. Re:Duh! is the only appropriate response by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 1

      Sometimes it happens by accident. You click on a link that CLAIMS it's going to one kind of site but is in fact going to a different type. Also, many sites were in the practice of sitting on likely typo's of popular site names. Once upon a time, mistyping "www.yaho.com" instead of "www.yahoo.com" would get you to a porn site with the assinine unclosable popups (Firking Javascript abusers).

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

  6. Easy bypass... by swordboy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    When we get a blocked site, we just plug in an 802.11x card and surf through one of the TWO DOZEN unsecured access points in range... Or VNC home...

    --

    Life is the leading cause of death in America.
    1. Re:Easy bypass... by BrookHarty · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Same thing here, we need SSH and FTP out. So, just ssh tunnel into your home unix box, and surf from there. Also for some unknown reason, Windows Remote Desktop is allowed. So we can also use our windows boxen from home to surf.

      And if all else fails, we have http-tunnel, or even a gprs aircard.

    2. Re:Easy bypass... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or SSH through a proxy at home...

    3. Re:Easy bypass... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      aren't we clever? SSH port forwarding.

      Actually, I did this when we had local access but our international lines were fscked up, but I could make it out to the net from my Roadrunner cable modem.

      this guy is a fool to wait until he gets to a blocked site, as he's already been logged.

      But then, he shouldn't be going to blocked sites. I think reading a site like slashdot is legit if you don't do it to much (like... coffee-break time scale), and it does keep one technically informed (don't laugh). But a specifically blocked site, or porn... those are not for from work browsing.

    4. Re:Easy bypass... by Cumstien · · Score: 2, Funny

      To read "The Onion" I have to access the PDA site. http://mobile.theonion.com/
      or use an anonymizer in Europe that hasn't been blocked. This takes even more time then just permitting the damm site!

    5. Re:Easy bypass... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're in range of two dozen access ports and can still use 802.11b, I want to hear from you. That's quite an achievement.

  7. Dang right! by CrackerJackz · · Score: 1

    Where else can you get high speed access to rare Squirrel p0rn (tm)?

  8. Are you a thief? by Corrupt+System · · Score: 4, Funny

    Remember, if you comment on this from work you're stealing from your employer. I always take days off to read Slashdot.

    --
    The solution that has worked best for me...is to avoid public discussion. -- CmdrTaco
    1. Re:Are you a thief? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I'm at home and thinking about some project that I am doing for my boss, is he stealing from me???? After all, work is work and home is home... Actually, what should be my compensation when I'm having sex, and for some god d*mn reason, some work related cr*p pops into my mind, that I can't help thinking about it??? Is my boss stealing some of my happiness???? :-)

    2. Re:Are you a thief? by tmonkey · · Score: 0

      so i guess you stay home all day every day?!!!!

    3. Re:Are you a thief? by exhilaration · · Score: 2, Funny
      You forgot an even greater crime:

      You are a TERRORIST if you bypass your employer's Internet filtering/monitoring software through SSH/VNC/RDP.

      Real Americans have nothing to hide.

    4. Re:Are you a thief? by SecGreen · · Score: 1

      Since many of us read in the ad-supported mode, doesn't that mean that the advertisers are stealing from our employers?

      --
      Dupe posts are /.'s tacit protest on the rights of users to time-shift content...
    5. Re:Are you a thief? by ReelOddeeo · · Score: 2, Funny

      Remember, if you comment on this from work you're stealing from your employer. I always take days off to read Slashdot.

      Really, for shame. You know better than this.

      You should be using up sick days to read Slashdot.

      --

      Those who would give up liberty in exchange for security and DRM should switch to Microsoft Palladium!
    6. Re:Are you a thief? by Corrupt+System · · Score: 1

      You are a TERRORIST if you bypass your employer's Internet filtering/monitoring software through SSH/VNC/RDP.

      If you bypass it to read Slashdot you are. You do know, of course, that terrorists communicate through encrypted messages embedded in AC crapfloods?

      --
      The solution that has worked best for me...is to avoid public discussion. -- CmdrTaco
    7. Re:Are you a thief? by thrillbert · · Score: 1

      Actually, what should be my compensation when I'm having sex, and for some god d*mn reason, some work related cr*p pops into my mind

      First off, what are you doing thinking about work while you're having sex?!?!?!?

      Second, thinking about your boss' secretary is hardly considered work..

      ---
      A fool must now and then be right by chance.

  9. Absolutely by Oculus+Habent · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think especially as projects get piled on people, the ability to take a break and escape from your projects is of paramount importance. An Internet connection is the water cooler of the future, so to speak.

    --
    That what was all this school was for... to teach us how to solve our own problems. -- janeowit
    1. Re:Absolutely by idontgno · · Score: 5, Funny
      An Internet connection is the water cooler of the future, so to speak.

      In other news, HydroSequre (NAWSDOC:HSQ) announced today groundbreaking new water-cooler monitoring technology. The system, called "Chiller", incorporates microphones, video cameras, and electrically-charged floor plates to ensure that the water cooler is not a source of productivity loss.

      "Employers provide water to employees to meet critical business-related hydration needs, not as a source of titillation and gossip-mongering. Corporations can't afford to subsidize the time-wasting chit-chat about last night's hockey game or who's schtupping whom in HR." commented Lloyd Getalife, Executive VP of Productivity Marketing.

      Note to the humor-impaired: It's a joke. Successful or not, it's supposed to be funny. And God forbid if I should accidentally stomp on someone's trademark, securities listing, or business plan. In that case, it's accidental parody and protected by what little is left of fair use doctrine.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    2. Re:Absolutely by tomhudson · · Score: 1
      Not just that, but, let's face it, we DO need to keep up-to-date in this field, and on of the best ways is still to network w. other humans.

      Chalk up your slashdot time to personal development/research/etc.

      After all, you must have come up w. at least ONE useful hint/idea/solution to a problem while reading the posts here :-)

      It's certainly better than what's on the office radio right now (talk radio re: Michael Jackson - ugh!)

    3. Re:Absolutely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wish I could -5 modifier any post that starts with "in other news", because they're always retarded.

  10. My bad by whitelabrat · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...whoops! I guess I should stop monitoring my corporate network. :)

  11. I just showed this to my boss... by Chocolate+Teapot · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...and he fired me for reading /. on company time. The link is wrong BTW.

    --
    Modest doubt is called the beacon of the wise. - William Shakespeare
    1. Re:I just showed this to my boss... by 4of12 · · Score: 1

      The link is wrong BTW.

      Huh? He must have thought the goat was not work related.

      --
      "Provided by the management for your protection."
  12. Take days off? by Mark+Pitman · · Score: 4, Insightful
    ...people have to take days off from work to deal with personal business that could have been done in a few minutes or hours from a work net connection...

    If you can do it on the web from work in a few minutes, why would you need to take a day off to do it from home? The web is open 24 hours! Take a few minutes at home to get it done in the evening instead of taking the day off. If you don't have an Internet connection at home, go to the library. That's just ridiculous.

    1. Re:Take days off? by jwbozzy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I agree totally. I do occasionally take days off for personal business, but that is for things like car maintenance and the like, where I could not possibly be at work. Things like online banking, online bill pay, and auctions are not an excuse to take a day off.

      However it is a horrendously bad idea to block access to things that are not directly inappropriate, like porn and online casinos. I highly doubt you are losing more than 10 - 20 minutes a day on this, and how much time is lost in impromptu meetings in hallways, at watercoolers, etc or long lunches? I would say that the costs at my old company(where I had to implement this) were far higher than the benefits of a few minutes of time lost.

      --
      perl -e 'printf("mmm %x\n", 3735928559)'
    2. Re:Take days off? by xanadu-xtroot.com · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, there's this new invention called TIME ZONES. Lets say I live in California, and I need to contact a company in New York about something before the close of the business day there. Please explain to me how I'm supposed to do that after *MY* business day when it's 8:00 on the East coast, but it's only 5:00 to me (if you don't factor in drive time).

      --
      I'm not a prophet or a stone-age man,
      I'm just a mortal with potential of a super man.
    3. Re:Take days off? by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      >> The web is open 24 hours!

      Maybe so, but if I want my electronic mortgage payment to go through on that business day, I have to get it done by 3. If I want to order nephew's birthday present, I have to do it before the webstore closes if I want it to ship in time.

      Just because the servers are running 24/7 doesnt mean all the businesses are. So I go to the bank and the toy store and my lunch-hour (which is usually the 5 minutes it'd take to wolf down a sandwich) turns into 1.5-2 hours.

      That's the point of the article, I guess. Though I dont totally agree with it.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    4. Re:Take days off? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Shockingly enough, some of us don't have internet connections at home! While it is a great security measure, it's actually cause I'm renting a room in a house and the owner doesn't want anyone using a dialup connect to tie up the phone line.

      So if we can't order something on line at amazon.com, we're gonna have to go to a bookstore and spend possibly hours going to several different stores and scouring the shelves hoping to find what we need.

      You might say we could do it on weekends, but actually, I leave town every weekend to be with my wife who is attending college in another city.

      Yeah, yeah, my situation may seem remarkably unique, but these things can an do happen.

    5. Re:Take days off? by Isle · · Score: 1

      Maybe they also talk about use of email or phone and maybe getting in touch with someone specific during normal office hours. I wont stay online 24 hours for your petty sake.

    6. Re:Take days off? by Mark+Pitman · · Score: 1

      If you need to contact someone before the close of business in a different time zone, what would that have to do with surfing the web? If you really need to contact them that urgently, you should be using the phone. Web based support forms aren't all that reliable when you need something in a hurry.

    7. Re:Take days off? by charon_on_acheron · · Score: 1

      "Maybe so, but if I want my electronic mortgage payment to go through on that business day, I have to get it done by 3. "

      So do it at home the night before. It will go through at the same time as doing it at noon on that day, since it will be after 3pm. While I agree that employers should be less dictatorial on this issue, your argument doesn't stand.

    8. Re:Take days off? by Mark+Pitman · · Score: 1
      ... but if I want my electronic mortgage payment to go through on that business day...order nephew's birthday present, I have to do it before the webstore closes if I want it to ship in time...

      Both of these are examples of trying to do something at the "last minute". Don't procrastinate so much and you won't find yourself in these situations. Is it your employer's problem that you can't manage your time properly?

    9. Re:Take days off? by shpoffo · · Score: 1

      Please quit splitting hairs and pouncing on semantics. If this article wasn't so valid, it wouldn't be getting the attention it is. All of the fun and productive companies have extensive recreational provisions that are supported & attended by management/executives of the company.

      shpoffo

    10. Re:Take days off? by angle_slam · · Score: 1

      Uhhhh, how about doing it in the morning (when it's 6am in CA, it is 9AM in NY).

    11. Re:Take days off? by pyrrho · · Score: 1

      he can't, he was busy working from home last night.

      --

      -pyrrho

    12. Re:Take days off? by sporty · · Score: 1

      Why can't it work in reverse? I'm required to be here 40 hours a week when the load is light. When it is heavy, i work extra.

      So if they require me to be here all that extra time, what do I do then?

      --

      -
      ping -f 255.255.255.255 # if only

    13. Re:Take days off? by Dudio · · Score: 1

      I've been arguing this very point around here for a couple of years now. If your people are inclined to fuck off around the office, they are going to find a way to do it, whether it's surfing the web, talking on the phone, reading the paper, hanging around the water cooler or simply staring off into space. Trying to restrict any or all of these things does nothing to motivate the unmotivated, while at the same time reducing the motivation of the productive people by sending the message that management doesn't trust them.

      In the case of IT workers, filtering web access can significantly reduce their ability to do their jobs by making it prohibitively difficult to perform routine research. Typical blocked categories include such things as eCommerce, personal website portals, usenet archives and hacker sites. To the suits, there is no reason anybody would need these to do their jobs. But what if I need to buy a book to get up to speed on a new technology? What if Google points me to a Geocities page that appears to answer fully the question I have on some obscure technical topic? What if I want to search usenet archives for some inscrutible Windows error that I can't find on MSDN? What if I'm trying to figure out if some new IE vulnerability affects me, and the discoverer's site is classified as a hacker site?

      The answer around here is "if you can demonstrate that you need access to this site and your manager will sign off on it, we will either let you access this specific site or print off a hardcopy of the document for you." Unfortunately, this does nothing to help me research similar things in the future. What it does do very effectively is instill in the employees resentment against the corporate bureaucracy, and rob them of any inclination to do more than the absolute minimum required to get a paycheck.

      Managers need to identify which employees are pulling their weight and which are not, and focus their efforts on the laggards while staying out of the way of the performers. Micromanaging the whole team is not the way to get people to work harder.

    14. Re:Take days off? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just because the servers are running 24/7 doesnt mean all the businesses are.

      Actually in my experience even though the servers may be up, they're likely not "ready for use" 24/7. Lots of banks/telcos/etc schedule down time every night for backups, etc.

    15. Re:Take days off? by Hast · · Score: 1

      You also need to consider how much time is "wasted" if he instead of ordering spends the rest of the day worrying about it.

      So it might very well be that if he spends 10 minutes ordering the thing then he can be more productive during the following hours.

      Sure he "should" have though of it before, but perhaps he wasn't sure what to get the kid. Or he had the "wish-list email" at work.

  13. SSH Tunnel by Yuan-Lung · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I sometimes do visit "questionable" sites from work. When I am doing that, I just SSH tunnel home and proxy from there.

    1. Re:SSH Tunnel by CharlieO · · Score: 2, Interesting

      But that does rather rely on you being able to SSH tunnel out - frankly rather abvious at the firewall if you are the only one doing it.

      "Hmmm, Mike's set up an SSH tunnel between his desktop and an IP address in the range of an ISP - I wonder what *valid* reason he's doing that for..."

    2. Re:SSH Tunnel by vrone · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Have you ever set up an SSH tunnel? It's just a regular SSH connection. In other words, they really can't tell the difference between a tunnel and a normal connection. The SSH client just listens to the loopback interface on a port that the user chooses, then sends it through to the other side. In other words, your point is without merit unless he works somewhere where *using* SSH would set off bells.

    3. Re:SSH Tunnel by Yuan-Lung · · Score: 2, Interesting

      But that does rather rely on you being able to SSH tunnel out - frankly rather abvious at the firewall if you are the only one doing it.

      That might be the case somewhere else, but here our department ssh, telnet, and ftp are use for run of the mill day to day operations. We send and grab data from external hosts. So a SSH tunnel connected consistently to a specific shaw cable IP usually wouldn't attract much attention.

    4. Re:SSH Tunnel by PD · · Score: 1

      I've got sshd running on my home machine on the usual port, and also on port 443. I don't have any secure web pages on my server, and most companies leave it open if they have port 80 open. Plus the data is encrypted just like you would expect on port 443.

    5. Re:SSH Tunnel by CharlieO · · Score: 1

      Have you ever set up an SSH tunnel?

      Yep

      In other words, your point is without merit unless he works somewhere where *using* SSH would set off bells.

      Like my company - hard firewall, web and ftp proxy only with full content filtering - SSH used by under 5 people... which was my point.

      My apologies for keeping the word 'tunnel' in my discussion to keep it in context, when I was refering to SSH itself.

  14. Work at work by MCMLXXVI · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why does everyone complain when they are expect to actually do work at work. They are not paying you to keep the seat warm.

    On another point I say two can play at that game. You want me to work every second I am at work that's fine. But when that clock hits 5:00 I drop everything and leave.

    1. Re:Work at work by swordgeek · · Score: 1

      Many reasons.

      1) People are lazy.
      2) People feel they owe their employer nothing, and have no loyalty. (perhaps partly justified)
      3) The modern work ethic seems to be show up in the morning, go home in the late afternoon, and make sure your work all gets done. Whether you do that at work or at home, and when you show up or go home (within reason) seems to be less and less concrete.

      If I'm given a three hour job at 4:00 that MUST be done today, and am not getting overtime for it, then be damed if I make sure my coffee breaks don't go over 15 minutes. Alternatively, if I'm on a punch clock and my workday is over at 5:00 then I'm going to work my ass off until that very moment.

      I think ultimately the workplace has become more relaxed, which gives slackers and whiners more room to complain without getting their lazy asses fired. The rest of us will just enjoy having more freedom in how we get our work done. (and work more effectively for it)

      --

      "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
    2. Re:Work at work by MisterFancypants · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Why does everyone complain when they are expect to actually do work at work. They are not paying you to keep the seat warm.

      In general people cannot properly focus for more than a few hours on one issue without taking a break. If people are going to take breaks anyway why not let them access the net (of course, I don't think they should be accessing porn sites and such from work, but why not Slashdot, etc)?

      Of course at this point some programmers will chime in about how they can focus on their code for 12 hours... Save it for someone else. In my experience people who do that tend to write substandard code, because usually the best way to solve a thorny coding issue is to STEP AWAY from the computer (or switch away from the code editor anyway) for a while and let your mind think of other things while it processes the problem. Sitting there beating the problem over the head with more and more brute-force code is not the way to solve it.

    3. Re:Work at work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Why does everyone complain when they are expect to actually do work at work. They are not paying you to keep the seat warm."

      They are paying to get the job done. It isn't their business HOW it's done (like 80% work, 10% porn, 10% slashdot).

      "You want me to work every second I am at work that's fine."

      That's fine??? Humans aren't robots, they need to take short breaks during work.

    4. Re:Work at work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BINGO! you've got the million dollar answer...

      If your boss is an utter asshole and does the natzi treatment you need to do the same... work BY THE BOOK... 8am to 5pm no matter what. Oh and the company cellphone is turned off.

      1f they want to be strict... then you be strict.. Pay me overtime for every second I work outside normal hours or go to hell.

    5. Re:Work at work by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

      Are you honestly telling me that you can focus and give maximum productivity for 8 hours a day EVERY day? I'm betting not. People need a release once and awhile and surfing the net, chatting to co-workers, and so on can be that release. Helps them collect their thoughts and do better work. Sure, I can really focus myself and maintain maximum output for hours on end, but only under special circumstances. I try and do that everyday, I'll burn out. Same with basically all people.

    6. Re:Work at work by tshak · · Score: 1

      Why does everyone complain when they are expect to actually do work at work.

      I mean, really, if you need to eat, use the restroom, or do any other human task during the greater part of your human life, try to keep such tasks away from the workplace!

      --

      There is no longer anything that can be done with computers that is nontrivial and clearly legal. -- Paul Phillips
    7. Re:Work at work by t0rnt0pieces · · Score: 4, Insightful

      In general people cannot properly focus for more than a few hours on one issue without taking a break... ..usually the best way to solve a thorny coding issue is to STEP AWAY from the computer (or switch away from the code editor anyway) for a while and let your mind think of other things while it processes the problem...

      I agree with everything you said. It's just impossible to focus on work for 8 hours straight, especially one that requires a lot of concentration, like programming. I've found that when I'm coding a difficult problem, I have to step away from the computer for a while and just sit and think about it. Sure, I could come up with some shitty hack on the fly, but in order to do the job right you need breaks every now and then. I guess pr0n should be forbidden at work, but I don't see what's wrong with visiting "family" websites like /. ;-) But even if they have a rule against pr0n, I still don't think it's a good idea to have big brother looking over everyone's shoulders. Employees should be entitled to a little bit of privacy, even at work. One of the biggest complaints about my current employer is that they treat everyone like retarded children. They have strict rules about using the net. Basically, if you're caught on the internet you get fired. Of course, everyone who works there is miserable. It would probably do wonders for workplace morale if employers started showing a little more trust in their workers instead of using threats to keep them in line. I cringe every time a manager says "Oh by the way, you're not allowed to do ____, that's a terminable offense." And it doesn't help when then openly violate their own rules all the time.

      --
      Karma: Excellent (In Soviet Russia, karma pimps YOU)
    8. Re:Work at work by urbazewski · · Score: 5, Insightful
      "Work" turns out to be a surprisingly vague concept, even for people in traditional factory jobs. One of the most successful, and hardest to organize and implement, industrial actions is "work-to-rule", where each worker follows every rule to the letter and refuses to do things that are not specifically "their job." This type of action lowers productivity dramatically, emphasizing that workplaces depend critically on voluntary cooperation.

      The economist George Akerlof modeled the cooperative aspects of the labor market formally in a paper called "Labor Contracts as Partial Gift Exchange" ( Quarterly Journal of EconomicsVol. 97, No. 4, pp. 543-569).

      I find the view that reading /. or making phone calls at work is "stealing" to be naive and simplistic --- so much depends on subtle (or not so subtle) levels of effort that cannot be measured or coerced. The poster's comments that "two can play at that game. You want me to work every second I am at work that's fine. But when that clock hits 5:00 I drop everything and leave." illustrate this perfectly.

      blog-O-rama

      --
      foldplay your photos won't know what hit them.
    9. Re:Work at work by Shads · · Score: 1

      > 2) People feel they owe their employer nothing,
      > and have no loyalty. (perhaps partly justified)

      I provide exactly as much loyalty as I see given around the companies I've worked for... that would be absolutely none. The best I saw for loyalty was an isp I worked for and they axed a few people just because the boss's girlfriend didn't like them (competition and all-- his gf was the secretary) even though the people did their jobs well. They were the closest to a 'loyal' company I've ever seen... mostly good to the employees. Till they sold the company and everyone got axed.

      --
      Shadus
    10. Re:Work at work by Shads · · Score: 1

      What I really love is being bitched at for reading slashdot 2x a day (at about 10 minutes a time) when the guy in the cube next to me goes on 3-4 15m smoke breaks with the boss per day, 2-3 of his own smoke breaks, and spends the rest of the time chatting with other people... while I do real work. Inspires me to work harder let me tell ya.

      --
      Shadus
    11. Re:Work at work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why does everyone complain when they are expect to actually do work at work.

      I'm oncall 24/7, and I often have to work from home. If I have to spend my free time doing unpaid work, I think it's only fair that I have at least a *little* fun on the job.

    12. Re:Work at work by GlassHeart · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Why does everyone complain when they are expect to actually do work at work.

      There's a difference between an employee whining about having to work 8 hours a day, and a business realizing that regular breaks actually improve productivity. This is especially true for humans in creative professions. Taking a stroll (or even Slashdot) can often get you a solution faster than staring at the problem.

      The second point is that people remember to do things when they remember. Let's say you suddenly remembered that you need to order a gift for someone. You can either take a few minutes to get it over with, or try to remember it for the rest of the day. Which one is likely to distract you from work more?

      On another point I say two can play at that game. You want me to work every second I am at work that's fine. But when that clock hits 5:00 I drop everything and leave.

      Exactly. The question is not which policies employees dislike, but which policies actually improve productivity.

    13. Re:Work at work by Kintanon · · Score: 2, Offtopic

      I had this problem at a previous employer.
      I would leave 30 minutes early 3 times a week to go to my martial arts classes.
      I was a salaried employee, so I got paid the same no matter what.
      My boss, her boss, 3 of the programers, and untold support people took between 5 and 8 smoke breaks, each lasting 15 minutes or more per day.
      I was asked to stop leaving 30 minutes early, my response, "If I get a crack habit can I keep my current schedule? Because all of you guys are taking half a dozen 15 minute breaks a day while I skip lunch."
      That didn't go over well. I got lectured so much... That was when I decided to quit. Still took me a couple of months to find a new job and really get ready to leave. But eventually I got out of there. The job was hell...
      And incidentally I hate smokers. I hate them SOOO much, with their free extra breaktimes.

      Kintanon

      --
      Check out JoshJitsu.info for Brazilian Ji
    14. Re:Work at work by BryanL · · Score: 1

      At first I thought yout said they are not paying to keep you warm. But that brought to mind the fact that they do pay to keep you warm. It isn't directly related to profits, it is for employee comfort and a comfortable employee is a productive employee. Having the internet to use at work, if it is not abused, also makes an employee comfortable and, as the article points out, makes an employee more comfortable.

      (By the way, an employee can waste company resources by adjusting the thermostat as well.)

    15. Re:Work at work by Mr.+Bad+Example · · Score: 1

      > They are not paying you to keep the seat warm.

      Speak for yourself.

      Proud employee of Amalgamated Butt Heat, Inc.

    16. Re:Work at work by Iffy+Bonzoolie · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I've found that I can "hyperfocus" on things sometimes, working straight for hours without a break... but only at random, sporadically occurring moments. But for day-to-day work, I can't focus on programming for 8 straight hours a day. And I know most of the people I've worked with are the same way - some of them admit it, some of them don't. I think this is true for almost any intensely mental occupation. I can't speak for physical occupations, but there are protective laws for that sort of thing.

      People who seem to be constantly producing code, in my experience, are not thinking about it much. They aren't trying to engineer a proper solution, they just hack in whatever gets the job done as soon as possible. And that sort of thing REALLY kicks you in the nads 12-18 months down the line, especially if you are working on an evolving piece of software and have to maintain and extend it for an significant period of time.

      I think non-technical management tends not to understand this very well, especially if they have no direct way of measuring performance.

      Actually, what it comes down to is this whole subject is just a symptom of the problem that non-techinical (and even technical) management don't have EFFECTIVE ways of measuring productivity/performance. I mean, sure, a guy can hit all his deadlines, but maybe you have to throw out his code when he leaves. Maybe another person misses every deadline, but their code is robust and easily maintained. Which one you want depends on your situation. Sometimes you want a guy who can prototype and build a working demo super fast, if you don't care about maintaining it. Sometimes you want someone who will invest a lot of thought into a project and build something you can reuse over and over again, or that reduces overall development time. But management generally DOES NOT KNOW what they want in this regard. Or they don't know what they are actually getting. Or they think they know, but they are wrong. And, for lack of a better option, they look to Slashdot (or web browsing) on the job as an explanation.

      Of course, some people really are slackers and don't get anything done, good or bad. But, I think productive people are productive with or without internet access. We want to correlate these behaviors, but I don't think it's there.

      -If

      --
      Run a pencil-and-paper RPG campaign with your far-off friends: Gametable!
    17. Re:Work at work by Scott+Hale · · Score: 1
      I find the view that reading /. or making phone calls at work is "stealing" to be naive and simplistic

      When I worked at Radio Shack, there was a girl who the first thing she would do when she got to work was call her boyfriend long-distance and talk for several hours. Tell me that's not stealing. One night after an hour stretch of talking to him on a mobile phone in the bathroom, she walked out to find my boss standing there waiting to fire her, but not before she ran up the phone bill an obscene amount.

    18. Re:Work at work by calvinthorne · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And incidentally I hate smokers. I hate them SOOO much, with their free extra breaktimes.
      ---
      Do you also hate non-smokers who take 10min walks periodically throughout the day to clear their head/get away from a problem?

      That's pretty much how I use my smoke breaks. And since my boss and closest co-worker smoke, sometimes we'll take a smoke break but continue to talk through whatever it is we've been working on. Unfortunately, as a nicotiene addict, it is hard for me to know if my concentration is waning from some "natural" force or because my brain is craving it's drug and focusing more attention on it. I do know that a nicotiene fix for a nicotiene addict helps restore concentration (not to mention reduce crabbiness), so it's actually a productivity booster.

    19. Re:Work at work by Shads · · Score: 1

      Offical policy here is 2 15m breaks, 1 60m unpaid lunch. If smokers want to take their 2 15s... no boggle. If they want to take 10 like most of them do... that pisses me the hell off. Same with nonsmokers who walk or people who yak at other people in the office or whatever... shitty is shitty.

      --
      Shadus
    20. Re:Work at work by jtheory · · Score: 1

      I would agree with this only to a degree -- personally, if I immediately turn my mind to something engaging (like some /. discussions), it doesn't help me with the problem I'm working on. I need to take breaks and just go for a walk to think. Avoiding structured thought for a while helps much more than intense thought on a different (non work-related) problem will... especially if I get really interested and suddenly find I've wasted 4 hours, which I seem to be prone to if I'm not careful.

      THAT SAID, I find it highly demoralizing when a company prevents me from reading theonion.com once a week (which my current employer does). I also have to give a detailed reason and wait a week if I want to make anything other than a port 80 connection to any server outside the firewall, even just FTP or SSH.

      I think it should be more an issue of self-discipline, like anything else. There are people where I work who stand around chatting for 3-4 hours a day... I don't see the company locking them in their cubicles to prevent this!! They'll just be fired if their work is seriously impacted.

      --
      There are only 10 types of people: those who understand decimal, those who don't, and, uh, 8 other types I forget.
    21. Re:Work at work by RubberDuckie · · Score: 1

      Ok, let's say I don't owe my company loyalty. I'll keep my resume updated, and not feel to bad if I find a better job and leave.

      On the other hand, I do owe them a full days work for a full days pay.

    22. Re:Work at work by aeschenkarnos · · Score: 2, Funny

      Don't worry about the smokers. They're taking breaks out of their work time now, but it's kind of like flex leave from the far end of their lives. They'll pay it back then.

    23. Re:Work at work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Smoking does not enhance concentration or boost productivity. It only feels as if it is doing so; all that is really happening that your "nicotine fix" merely restores your concentration from "suppressed" to "normal". I suggest you read up on the biological and neurological effects of nicotine addiction. I'm sure you don't want to hear this, but you are only fooling yourself if you think smoking is benefitting you in any way whatsoever. Smoking only wastes money and causes health problems. (Heart disease and lung cancer are not productivity boosters either).

    24. Re:Work at work by error0x100 · · Score: 1

      Indeed. Try google for some more information, e.g http://www.nida.nih.gov/MOM/TG/momtg-nicotine.html . The release of dopamine may also be perceived as 'increased focus'.

      "Cigarette smoking kills at least 400,000 people in the United States each year and makes countless others ill, including those who are exposed to secondhand smoke". Try tell me with a straight face that that is productivity enhancing in any company/economy..

    25. Re:Work at work by Zebthepilot · · Score: 1

      I would leave 30 minutes early 3 times a week to go to my martial arts classes. I was a salaried employee, so I got paid the same no matter what. My boss, her boss, 3 of the programers, and untold support people took between 5 and 8 smoke breaks, each lasting 15 minutes or more per day.

      Reminds me of a government agency I used to work for.

      Hangar Z

      --
      http://www.zebpalmer.com
    26. Re:Work at work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah I am so lucky to live in a country where invading an employee's privacy - even at work - is illegal. :)

    27. Re:Work at work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The inability to step away from the screen is what will have me looking for another job starting next month or so.

      I work in a very small office. It lacks a social circuit (ie. nobody can be bothered to communicate with any of the others). There is no break room. Outside the office is nothing worth looking at or visiting, so there is precisely nowhere to go when I feel the need for a short break.

      The only work I do is programming: come in, type for 8 hours, go home. I can feel myself burning out - another reason I will leave.

      In my particular case, webbrowsing is not the answer. I don't browse the web much anymore, since it is just another screen-related activity. I need some work away from the screen much more than I need internet access.

      Ah well, I already decided to finish my current project (worked on it for five years, might as well finish it now) and then walk. Next month...

    28. Re:Work at work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I read once about a particularly effective railroad 'strike' (where the railroad workers were forbidden by law to strike) there was some law that said the whole train needed to be fully inspected at every stop.

      So when they actually did fully inspect the train at every stop, it slowed the process down to a crawl.

    29. Re:Work at work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      They are not paying you to keep the seat warm.
      Oh, how I wish that were true! Obviously, they do expect me to do work sometimes, but I've spent plenty of time at work when I wasn't adequately busy. I've even sought out work when I didn't have anything to do, but that usually ends up as a disaster (don't ask.) (Well, I did get to work on a few interesting things. One project has never been deployed though because all of the people who wanted it got fired during the last reorg and none of the remaining people are interested.)

      I even tried to quit a while back but got the super hard sell from the CIO who wants to keep me around for some reason even though I'm bored and frustrated most of the time. (I'm not the only developer in this situation another developer who was bored and spent a lot if his time trying to think of things to do also got the hard sell from the CIO.)

      I suspect she needs to keep developers in her budget for some reason, even though they give most of the work to consultants and not to the internal development staff. What little work we have to do is to clean up messes left behind by consultants. Oh well, at least I have a job and make a decent living, even if I hate it and feel like I spend way to much time surfing... I've been looking but it is very discouraging, and when I have a nice project to work on that keeps me busy I tend to settle in and give up the job hunt...

      Unfortunately, except for a few projects, most of my day to day work doesn't involve any programming at all. (I have work, but it is mostly stuff that an intern could do with no problem and that doesn't require any programming skill. Like updating the departments metrics and making them into a nice powerpoint show, for example.)

    30. Re:Work at work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, it's stealing because it's a long distance call. If it was a local call and she was making or beating her sales quota they wouldn't have cared. (At least, the manager at the radio shack I worked at wouldn't have cared, except he would have tried to swoop in and steal as many of those sales as possible.)

    31. Re:Work at work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      (of course, I don't think they should be accessing porn sites and such from work, but why not Slashdot, etc)?

      Personally, I find Slashdot a *much* greater time-sink than the little porno site I like to visit (the one that slips thru the proxy server). I have unfortunately found myself realizing that I've spent 2-3 hours reading through a discussion & posting stuff on slashdot, without standing up out of my seat or looking away from the computer screen. If instead I go to and d/l a pic or two, I get my fix and am done with it. I may return again in 10 minutes, but it's not a solid, 100% distraction like /. .

    32. Re:Work at work by calvinthorne · · Score: 1

      Gotcha. No official policy on breaks where I work, so it's a little more slippery to define the issue...

  15. Tell me about it... by meme_police · · Score: 1

    ...with remote administration abilities my boss expected me to keep an eye on things 18 hours a day. During that woeful period I definitely worked more at home than I played at work. That is, until we learned that our overworked and understaffed dept was being outsourced. Then it was all play and little work for 6 months with some job searching going on, too.

    --

    The meme police, They live inside of my head

  16. I use to work in network security by ReidMaynard · · Score: 5, Interesting

    and was in charge of the "web tracking database". Although we blocked porn (about 30k sites) you can never get them all. Part of my duty was to give monthly lists of top porn abusers.

    I felt like I was peeping, looking at people's web habbits. It was truly the low point of my job. However, the execs (who were given access) thought it was a hoot, and (rumour has it) spent hours snikering over this stuff.

    I just noticed none of this is really "on topic"... oh well ...

    --
    -- www.globaltics.net

    Political discussion for a new world

    1. Re:I use to work in network security by Dr+Caleb · · Score: 2, Funny
      I felt like I was peeping, looking at people's web habbits.

      As the designated netcop for my company, I find it is a good way to get interesting leads to enjoy at home. Plus, no one would think twice about my looking at those sites at work, as "I had to see what kind of a site it was..."

      Perspective my friend, Perspective!

      --
      "History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme." Mark Twain
    2. Re:I use to work in network security by ReidMaynard · · Score: 1

      yea, I remember doing that. Sometime I couln't tell if the site was porn or not, just by the name. But by the 100th she-male-porn site, before 10am, I, well, was just mentally numb.

      --
      -- www.globaltics.net

      Political discussion for a new world

  17. This is Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and all of us know it. Many employees spend all day doing nothing but reading news and shopping.

  18. Re:Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The fact they've yet to find out implies they don't use the watchdog software very often.
    Otherwise, they'd simply require you use their monitoring software, no matter what OS you have.

  19. Re:Linux? by bmetzler · · Score: 1
    Instead of using the corprate Windows image, I simply put Gentoo on the box and they've yet to find out. This way, I ensure that all ports are secure (via %netstat) and retain my privacy.

    Provided you are not a troll, hasn't anyone walked over yet to see why they are having trouble "supporting" your box? Or don't they care?

    -Brent
  20. Hmm.. by stratjakt · · Score: 1

    >> The report notes that people have to take days off from work to deal with personal business that could have been done in a few minutes or hours from a work net connection

    If you're payed a wage, and you take a day off, you dont get paid. If you handle it in the office, you do get payed. So while employers may want less unproductive time, at least they arent paying for it.

    Usually the strictly controlled ones are the cubicle jockeys, not those with a salary.

    As for morale; that's what casual fridays are for! Me, I'm in my spider-man underroos. And I'm not worried about wasting time on /., because I'm on salary!

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    1. Re:Hmm.. by Proc6 · · Score: 1

      The object of doing business is not to avoid paying people, but to make a profit. If your employee shows up, spends 7 of 8 hours working, you pay them $300 and you make $500 off them, you are making a profit. If your employee doesn't show up, you pay them nothing, and they earn you nothing, you are not making a profit. Which would you rather have?

      --

      I'm Rick James with mod points biatch!

  21. Intel's policy: REASONABLE personal use. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I work at Intel, and actually enforce this policy. It's a great one! The company lands hard on people who are the subject of complaints (e.g., for visiting racist, "adult", or illegal (warez, etc.) sites).

    Zero monitoring is done for "performance management"--all that is handled through an employee's management chain. The expectation is that employees get all their work done. If they deliver good work on time, who CARES how much they surf? We treat our employees like adults, and find that the vast majority of them are able to manage their time properly.

    Senior management long ago decided to embrace the Internet economy--how hypocritical would it be for Intel to forbid our employees from participating on company time and Internet connectivity?

    I eBay online, bank online, read news (and /. too) online, and yes, I'm posting from work. It's a wonderful policy, "reasonable personal use." If in doubt, ask your manager: it's as simple as that.

    1. Re:Intel's policy: REASONABLE personal use. by eglamkowski · · Score: 3, Insightful

      My last job was like that, but it was a small company. They only cared that the work got done on time, and what you did between the assigning of the work and the turning in of the work was immaterial.

      Plus, they also encouraged gaming breaks once a day as stress relief, about a half hour.

      That was the most productive company I've worked in, both personally and as a whole.

      --
      Government IS the problem.
    2. Re:Intel's policy: REASONABLE personal use. by BrookHarty · · Score: 1

      It's a wonderful policy, "reasonable personal use." If in doubt, ask your manager: it's as simple as that.

      Work put a stop to online trading, we had to many people doing day trading all day. So far, this is the only abuse EVER in the last 4 years.

      But then, being a sys-admin, nobody watchs the watchers.

    3. Re:Intel's policy: REASONABLE personal use. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      Yes, I am blissfully retired from Intel (love those stock options! I sold 'em. :-) But feel compelled to make my first-ever AC post. Yes, block the pr0n, it helps protect the company from harassment lawsuits, and has no work value.

      But lets come clean on a silly policy. Intel also for some strange reason blocks sites critical of Intel employment practices. Now, most of these are run by crackpots and are full of misinformation. But why block them? Intel employees are grown up enough to read that stuff. That is a just plain silly policy. Anybody can go home and read them, and then ask the company why they block that -- what do they fear?


      Overall though, performance management deals with a lot. I've sat through plenty of Ranking and Rating sessions as a manager. "What did you produce for us last year?" cuts through a lot of crap and deals directly with the productivity issue in a real, bottom-line way.

    4. Re:Intel's policy: REASONABLE personal use. by indiigo · · Score: 1

      The company I work for (I admin the network/firewall/proxy) also has this policy. I presented the ability to provide reports for each node to direct managers, and they weren't interested. Unless there are periphery related signs (like abuse or slacking in other areas,) the directors of the firm said all's fair as long as noone is offended. The policy manual is there to keep us protected, mostly.

      That being said, I occasionally check the top 10 sites visited and they are *all* work related, and people aren't screwing around between 8-12 and 1-5. Since we don't pay more for extraneous bandwidth on this T-1, why should I care? Everyone wins.

      --
      fslg503-985-8686503-985-8686503-985-8686503-985-86 8650 3-985-fdsg8686503-985-8686503-985-8686503-9
    5. Re:Intel's policy: REASONABLE personal use. by SCHecklerX · · Score: 1

      Wasn't it Intel that had to crack down on Doom players in the day, b/c it was raising hell with the IPX network? Maybe this policy contributed to that problem :)

    6. Re:Intel's policy: REASONABLE personal use. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can understand blocking pr0n, illegal sites, and file sharing apps... but one thing that has REALLY pissed me off is that they've recently started blocking ALL urls that end in ".mp3", as well as legit music sites such as mp3.com (and even winamp.com!).

      Unfortunately, their reasoning behind this appears to be flawed. I can see 3 reasons why they may have done this: Searching for mp3s wastes time, downloading mp3s wastes bandwidth, piracy.

      1) Waste of time -
      Yes.. it does take a bit of time looking for mp3s, but once I've built a decent playlist (around 40 hours or so including ripped CDs) it doesn't really change much. And now, instead of finding a few mp3s and downloading them, I waste my time trying to find a way around this - IE: trying to find zip files which contain mp3s, and asking friends if they can find a song for me and e-mail it.

      2) Waste of bandwidth -
      This reason would make no sense at all. Now, instead of downloading a few mp3s, I'm forced to look for other forms of music. This often means streaming audio either from internet radio sites or other sources. I've never actually done the math, but it would seem to me that streaming audio would end up taking a LOT more bandwidth. Instead of downloading a file once, I have to download a song every single time I listen to it. Another option I have is to get the mp3s at home, then e-mail them to myself. Seeing as how I have a 200 meg limit on my mailbox, and assuming that no more than 30 megs or so is actually in use, that leaves me with the ability to waste around 170 megs of bandwidth a day. Whee.

      3) Piracy -
      *sigh*...
      Yes it is possible that people are downloading pirated music. It is also possible that they they are downloading completely legit music. I know of quite a few places to get LEGAL mp3s, and I use them frequently. Yes, I also download from other sources as well, but I can still download those at home and transfer them to my work comp via the aforementioned e-mail method. So in no way does this actually prevent piracy.

      On the plus side, this policy DOES piss me off, and causes me to rant endlessly about it on forums and to friends.

      And yes, I do realize that I can burn them to cdr at home and just bring them in, but what fun would that be when I'm pissed off and out for revenge?

    7. Re:Intel's policy: REASONABLE personal use. by incog8723 · · Score: 1

      Zero monitoring is done for "performance management"--all that is handled through an employee's management chain. The expectation is that employees get all their work done. If they deliver good work on time, who CARES how much they surf? Couldn't agree more. I have been in almost every sort of job imaginable, been in almost every position imaginable. The most insidious factor in making a bad employee is a bad manager. Every job I've ever taken, I have been faced with at least a few issues with management. Nothing short of Satan will make an employee unhappy faster than management asking them to not to do something that they themselves do relentlessly. However, I always make sure I do my job. Of course, stupidity angers me, but the smartest way to deal with management on *stupid* issues is to play them like they're a card game. Learn them, play by the rules, and after a while, when you've proven your viability, play a trump card: blackmail them. Everyone has something to hide. Catch them playing solitaire or something... it doesn't matter. just the general idea will keep their claws out of you. That is the KEY to job security :) Seriously!

    8. Re:Intel's policy: REASONABLE personal use. by Phiu-x · · Score: 0

      Ok I'll bite... You're there to WORK not to listen to music! If your employers let you listen to music while you work .. no problems (I do) but you should bring your own. If you really want to listen to mp3's then get'em at home, burn them and bring the cd. Stop complaining about not being able to download music (be it legit or not) it is THEIR time, THEIR bandiwth and as far as I know its not work related so they have every single rights to enforce that policy. What makes me laugh is when you say that it forces you to go look for other mean to get the mp3's ... pathethic.You have no point. I'm 100% with your bosses. If you're not happy then go find another job TROLL!

      --
      This is a stolen sig.
    9. Re:Intel's policy: REASONABLE personal use. by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 1

      The real culprit there is IPX - a horrible broadcast protocol that flooded the LAN. A modern multiplayer game, built on TCP or UDP wouldn't be that bad.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

  22. I'm posting this anonmously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This has happened where I work. There are various technical work arounds employed with but I will have to let other people give hints as the kind of hints I give will identify me, and get me shut down

    But yes it is depressing, the best fun that comes with it is trying to find loopholes, otherwise it's too depressing for words, and yes, I end up taking longer lunch breaks because of it.

  23. No it isn't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The link is wrong BTW
    No it isn't, but I just got bounced all around that site before I got the right page. Must be a new symptom of the slashdot effect.
    1. Re:No it isn't by Chocolate+Teapot · · Score: 1

      Yep. I got there in the end

      --
      Modest doubt is called the beacon of the wise. - William Shakespeare
  24. What type of monitoring? by I_am_Rambi · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That can make a difference. If a company is monitoring and blocks certain web sites, say p0rn, they are rightly to do so. I can not see how that can have a negative impact on a workplace. I can also understand if a company wants to block activity of music share programs, I believe, they are rightly to do so. You are not paying for the bandwidth, they are.

    I can also see that if a technology company (for example) blocks sites like slashdot (for example), that could possible be harmful. There seems to be a fine line of the control that is put into place and the up-keep of morale.

    There is also a thing call respect and honesty. Yes, somethings can be done faster while at work without net monitoring, but is the company really getting what they are paying for? (that is the worker, and the product s/he produces)

    The question is, "Is what I am doing honest towards the company or not?"

    1. Re:What type of monitoring? by shemnon · · Score: 1, Funny

      'Just ask yourself the question..... "Is This Good For The Company"?' [Points to teal and pink banner....]

      Good luck with the layoffs Bob!

      --
      --Shemnon
    2. Re:What type of monitoring? by ScooterBill · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah, I've seen people at work checking personal email, stock and sports scores and the news. This is probably more helpful than hurtful. Here the line is drawn to exclude anything that uses significant bandwidth, anything that opens the company network up to the outside, and anything that is illegal or could get the company sued. Oh yeah, you still have to get your job done too. I've also seen employees download literally gigs of music and video(until they were caught), people spending loads of time on instant messenger, 10 Meg video joke files getting forwarded to hundreds of people. Geez, people, use some common sense.

    3. Re:What type of monitoring? by gosand · · Score: 2, Insightful
      hat can make a difference. If a company is monitoring and blocks certain web sites, say p0rn, they are rightly to do so. I can not see how that can have a negative impact on a workplace. I can also understand if a company wants to block activity of music share programs, I believe, they are rightly to do so. You are not paying for the bandwidth, they are.

      Hey, I admit it, I do a ton of stuff online from work: banking, shopping, reading news sites. Doing "errands" online keeps me here instead of going out to do them, which people do. Reading news is no different than reading the paper on a break, which people do. So I check Slashdot occasionally. I don't go outside every 30 minutes to have a 10 minute cigarette either.

      I don't need to "surf", I haven't really randomly done that for about 5 years. I use the net as a tool. I don't look at pr0n at work either. They do have filters set up to block questionable pages. But the problem is that they simply subscribe to a service that gives them a list of sites to block. One guy I know was looking into buying furniture or something, and a major department store's website was blocked. Some legit tech sites are blocked too, I have tried to go there to read some articles. Things like ifilm.com are not blocked, but The Onion is. Which one is a bigger waste of time/bandwidth?

      The problem with filtering is that it is that it isn't perfect. If I had full access, I wouldn't violate company policy simply because I value my job. Too bad that this doesn't apply to everyone.

      --

      My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

    4. Re:What type of monitoring? by xanadu-xtroot.com · · Score: 1

      The question is, "Is what I am doing honest towards the company or not?"

      I used to sit over by the window and I used to watch the squirls and they were merry, but then they switched to the Boston stapler, but I kept my Swinline because it didn't bind up as much.

      --
      I'm not a prophet or a stone-age man,
      I'm just a mortal with potential of a super man.
    5. Re:What type of monitoring? by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No normal human can be productive for 8+ hours a day for days on end. Sorry, just not happening. People need to kick back every once and awhile and relax. To try and think that you can regulate things to the point where employees will be FORCED to do maximum work the whole day is stupid. If you take away any and all fun they'll eventually just get to the point of staring at the wall. You vertianly don't want people screwing off all the time and not doing what they are getting paid for BUT if you don't let them have some release, your overall productivity and morale will suffer.

    6. Re:What type of monitoring? by BrookHarty · · Score: 1

      Our company decided to block hotmail one day, Marketing flipped, and its back on.

      They also blocked FuckedCompany.com, that scared the shit out of me. They want to make sure no employees sees the layoff rumors!

    7. Re:What type of monitoring? by digital.dadaist · · Score: 1
      i absolutely agree. i worked for a large IT publishing company a couple years back and we had a nasty case of sexual harassment resulting from open access. some guy left a picture of a naked woman on a female co-worker's computer as a joke and she flipped.

      unfortunately, the company instituted draconian filtering as a result. my division did a webzine and so we were hit particularly hard when we couldn't go to google (!), salon, and other news sites. even slashdot. it only took a few minutes to call the admins every time we needed a new URL declassified, but it was still pretty ridiculous.

      at the same time, in this litigious age what choice does any company have?

    8. Re:What type of monitoring? by g(zerofunk.org) · · Score: 1

      The question is, "Is what I am doing honest towards the company or not?"
      Did you remember to fill out your TPS report correctly this week?
      g

    9. Re:What type of monitoring? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The question is, "Is what I am doing honest towards the company or not?"

      One day a man threatened to set himself on fire on the first floor of the building where I work. I lost all sense of corporate loyalty after the managers told us not to evacuate from the building because there had not been an evacuation signal from the proper authorities.

      I work on the fifth floor; seeing everyone from the other floors out on the streets, the firetrucks, police cars, etc. and realizing we were still hard at work because not losing those productive hours was more important than our fucking *lifes* made me realize were my priorities should lie.

  25. IT TAKES ME 1 HOUR TO DRIVE HOME AND WHACK IT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I can do it in 5 minutes surfing porno at my desk. This is an obvious productivity improvement.

  26. Hah HA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I work in a small office and I'm the only one who knows how to administer the Watchguard Firebox. They made me responsible for administering it because they got tired of paying consultants $150 an hour to do it.

    I have considered blocking certain sites because I surf them too much :/

  27. well, duh.. by EvilStein · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Take a look around and see how many office mates make personal phone calls from work.
    I've worked with people that made 5-10 personal calls every single day.
    Now, take a look at how many services have moved over to the web. Airline reservations, hotel bookings, banking and much more can be done over the web.

    I think that companies are really making too big of a deal out of "lost production because of internet usage."

    Place the blame where it should be placed - on the employee whos productivity suffers.

    1. Re:well, duh.. by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Of course they are making too big a deal out of it. People need to goof off during the work day from time to time. Just how it goes. As a highschool summer job, I once worked as a surveyor's assisstant. This was a job that was not done in an office. It was just you and the crew chief going to sites and doing work. You had no computer (well other than the digital measurement unit, but you can't exctally play games with that), generally didn't know anyone else on the site and so on. So did that mean that we were little non-stop working machines? No, we would talk, talk to other crews on the radio, take breaks to just sit down and so on. We did good work and got our job done, but to do that we needed a release every so often.

      No matter what the work environment, people aren't going to be maximally productive for all 8 hours. Employers just need to come to terms with that.

    2. Re:well, duh.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      My wife was an ICU nurse for a number of years. There's no way you can goof off when you are assigned two or three critically ill patients to take care of... come to think of it - no pee-breaks either. Some jobs lend themselves to goofing off, others cause people to die if you do.

    3. Re:well, duh.. by aeschenkarnos · · Score: 1

      A very good point. Company bandwidth is much cheaper than company phone calls.

    4. Re:well, duh.. by rela · · Score: 2, Insightful
      If she was unable to take five minutes to urinate during work, that would indicate the the hospital needs more nurses, I would think.

      ESPECIALLY in a job where people's lives are on your hands, do you really need the added stress of insufficient breaks (or of "God I really fucking need to piss!")?

      Sounds like a recipie for mistakes and disaster.

  28. Well, that's exactly what we wanted to hear!! by caluml · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hey Mr Boss - if you install this software to spy on us, our productivity will go down.

    It will?

    Er, yeah - this report says so.

    Hmmm... Well, on the basis of it, you'd better continue peer-to-peer filesharing and pr0n surfing then...

    1. Re:Well, that's exactly what we wanted to hear!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember this kind of nonsense whenever I had a sick day. Why is it assumed that because you're the network admin you're a fscking slave? Unless the server room in on fire (and if it is, you're not the damn fire department!), their shit can wait until you're healthy.

      Some people are really obnoxious in thinking that you're at their beck and call. Wrong! You're a fellow co-worker and should be treated with some degree of respect. But, some folks are egregiously obnoixious due to inbreeding or toxic personality syndrome. For these types, just call THEM on their spare time and demand shit of them. Preferably at 03:00 in the morning. They'll get the clue PDQ.

      Or do what I did whenever I'm sick: unplug the damn phone and blame it on the damn kids/dog/telephone company.

  29. But what if... by phaln · · Score: 1

    ...you work for an online porn monolith? Do they block CNN? How exactly would your productivity fall if you're already too busy with an 8-hour boner?

    --
    SNACKS ARE AWESOME
    1. Re:But what if... by mistcat · · Score: 1

      Ironically I have a good friend who works at one of the largest pron and sex toy websites in the world. (Think of the garden of Eden) They actually seem pretty worried about this sort of thing. My buddy got warned about "spending too much time instant messeging his friends" and he basically was given the impression that they were monitoring his communications and what he was doing on the companies internet dime.

      Hey Pr0n didn't fuel the expansion of VCRs, CDs,DVDs, and internet video streaming just for their employees to dick around with their time...

      --
      "A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on." - Sir Winston Churchill
  30. As a manager I don't care by Alomex · · Score: 5, Insightful


    As a manager I don't care if my employees surf the web at work. When I assign them a task I have a good idea how long it should take. If Joe Blow always takes longer than expected, I'll fire him, web surfing or not. If Jane Bleep routinely finishes her work ahead of time, I'll make sure she gets the biggest raise, come evaluation time, plus I'll praise her work in the next team meeting, and little could I care if she reads /. from work.

    1. Re:As a manager I don't care by mrtroy · · Score: 1

      i hope thats what my employer does too :)
      that is the smartest, most reasonable way to manage...really who cares if people are keeping up to date with news at work...they could also just stare at the computer screen for an hour and accomplish nothing
      or, if someone is smart/quick why should they not be able to take a quick look at news when they are done.

      --
      [I can picture a world without war, without hate. I can picture us attacking that world, because they'd never expect it]
    2. Re:As a manager I don't care by BWJones · · Score: 1

      Agreed. As long as my employees are not doing anything illegal online, I don't care how much bandwidth or time they spend on the internet as long as the tasks they are assigned get done with quality and on-time. However, some online activities while not explicitly illegal, can lead to problems in the work environment. I'm thinking specifically of an employee who surfed for porn on a co-workers computer leading to potential problems with sexual harassment for my business. This activity while not monitored was detected by the co-worker and combined with other problems did result in a termination of employment. I'm willing to give employees great latitude, but this went too far.

      --
      Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    3. Re:As a manager I don't care by jimboid · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Absolutely.

      As the owner of a small programming firm I take the same attitude. Manage by objective. Deal with problem employees as exceptions and not the rule. And deal with problems swiftly - the other employees know when a co-worker is f*cking the dog and they resent it. After a while they'll begin to wonder why they're working so hard.

      We carry this a little further... programming takes an enormous amount of concentration. If you have family problems then you aren't going to be much good to me. Go home and get them straightened out.

      The result has been an extremely loyal, hard working group who will, without being asked, stay to complete the job no matter how long it takes. They are, of course, paid for that time and food is brought in when required... but they don't have to ask if they'll be compensated. They know they will.

      The rules here are... don't do anything illegal and if you find some good porn - you have to share it.

    4. Re:As a manager I don't care by sgt_getraer · · Score: 1

      Wow... I didn't think your kind existed in the wild. Do you mind if I ask where you work? Are you accepting applicaitons?

    5. Re:As a manager I don't care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Arithmetic according to C: float x = 3.14159; float y = 1/2 * x; Value of y? zero.

      float x = 3.14159;
      float y = (float)1/2 * x;

  31. Re:Linux? by misterhaan · · Score: 5, Funny
    To: Amsterdam Vallon
    From: Management
    Re: Corporate "watchdog software"

    In regard to your comment #5252053, the administration would like to point out that we HAVE found out, and request that you would kindly remove all personal belongings from your cubicle by the end of the day. You can find boxes in the supply room.

    Sincerely,
    PHB

    PS: Don't bother coming in on Monday.

    --

    track7.org has all kinds of interesting stuff!

  32. commenting at work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    while on a conference call, eating my lunch, and waiting for a response on sametime...Some of us can multi-task, but I don't expect my management to understand that, so as a firewall admin I go outside it....

  33. Net monitor policies by Lumpy · · Score: 1, Interesting

    are usually made by idiots or people with a real power trip going.

    I tell them I monitor it, and I kind of do with the squid proxy for porn related... yes, I'm evil and squashing your rights to disallow you watching fisting or beatality videos here at work...

    but it's common knowlege in all the offices I maintain and supply that I dont give a rats ass what you do or where you go...BUT, if you are the source for a virus attack or I get complaints... I will fry your but hard.

    Overzealous monitoring is only done by people that really need to be on medical leave and treated for the social and mential disorders that they are afflicted with.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:Net monitor policies by krray · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I have to agree 100%. I've always told people that spikes in storage and/or spikes in bandwidth usually get my attention automagically.

      Have them do something on their system to demonstrate.
      My pager then goes off as they begin to understand.

      Explain "spam" and what to do with inbound. Outbound is, well, just unacceptable. Other minor guide lines, etc.

      I have a secretary that I *know* is instant messaging with her daughter in a far away state. I "monitor" phone bills too and have seen such calls from time to time. Nothing regular and lengthy -- but family *is* part of who you hire. People, we *are* all just people...

      I'd rather have her chat when she can. I know when the work isn't getting done. People also know that anybody and everybody wanders the building and may end up looking at your screen at any time. What was the passing game to do 20 years ago in your office? Same problem, different era.

      Yeah, I _could_ try and *CONTROL* people and make their will mine. I would also have very hostile employees...

    2. Re:Net monitor policies by Drakonian · · Score: 1

      People, we *are* all just people...
      Speak for yourself! I'm a souless machine!

      --
      Random is the New Order.
  34. You hiring? by Unknown+Poltroon · · Score: 5, Funny

    I mean, after you fire joe blow.

    --
    All Troll + "offtopic" mods are meta moderated as "Unfair", because you abused the system.
  35. Issues with the 8-hour work day by yndrd · · Score: 4, Insightful

    First it was the phone. Then it was e-mail. Then it was the Internet. Ever since 19th century sweatshops had people reading Bible verses to their employees, management has worried about lost productivity.

    The question they fail to ask, though, is: why do people waste part of their eight hour day? Because they don't need eight hours every day to do their jobs. Maybe they need twelve one day and four the next. Maybe they need six months of fourteen hour days and six months off.

    I think a larger issue needs to be addressed: do we still need the traditional eight-hour work day? If you're in a reactive job (manning phones or a cash register), I can understand it.

    For everyone else, it is just for appearance's sake. "Quick! Look busy!"

    1. Re:Issues with the 8-hour work day by travail_jgd · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "The question they fail to ask, though, is: why do people waste part of their eight hour day?"

      Some services (especially banks and physicians) are only available for a small part of the day. There may be some overlap, but what can you do when a customer-service line or bank closes at 4:00PM and you don't get out of work until 5:30PM?

      Slowdowns during the day aren't uncommon. As someone else said, when you're waiting for a program to compile, it's an opportunity to look at the Internet or personal email. There can be a brief lull between meetings, waiting for coworkers, etc.

      do we still need the traditional eight-hour work day?

      Try collaborating with a group in a different timezone -- preferably overseas. When you only have an hour or two when everyone is "in the office", organization and communication becomes difficult and slow. The same thing would happen if everyone picked their own hours and days.

    2. Re:Issues with the 8-hour work day by yndrd · · Score: 1

      I have no problem with having employees available for some set period during the day. But why eight hours? Why is eight hours magically the optimum amount of time during a day to work? Just because of the sun or agriculture?

      Research on the human attention span finds that people can't focus on one thing for anywhere near that long.

      I just think it is silly for employers to insist on exactly eight hours of work when there isn't always that much work to do.

    3. Re:Issues with the 8-hour work day by 6Yankee · · Score: 1

      We have flexi-time here, and it works reasonably well (except for the damned "core hours" idea) - work insane hours one week to get something out the door on time, then take a few days off later when it's quiet so I'm not climbing the walls getting paid to do nothing. Everybody wins.

      I like flex. With a bit of sense from management and employees, I think it nicely avoids the problems of the "traditional 8-hour work day".

      Stupid thing is, I'm as good as locked in for the whole day thanks to the "core hours" rule, can't do anything (waiting days for a test server now), and then feel *guilty* about *surfing*...

    4. Re:Issues with the 8-hour work day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Spot on. This also dovetails with the 'breaks increase productivity' comments above. I am an independent contractor, basically a one-man IT department for most of my customers, guru-in-reserve for a few others. I generally work 4-6 hour days. I only push it beyond 6 when I am really 'in the groove' and being highly productive. But most days, going past six doesn't make much sense. Be honest, how much do you actually accomplish in the last hour of most eight-hour workdays?

    5. Re:Issues with the 8-hour work day by benzapp · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Then it was the Internet. Ever since 19th century sweatshops had people reading Bible verses to their employees, management has worried about lost productivity

      It wasn't until the LATE 19th century. It was really not until Pavlov that conditioning of humans seemed to be a real possibility.

      This is why people are no longer free. The desire to micromanage free people like they are machines is inherently inhuman. The untold misery of modern world can be traced to that single fact.

      Most of the attempts at conditioning workers to accept drudgery and to do so without any loss of efficiency is what created the modern school system. Public schools were created to solve the problem you have just presented. For the most part, they have worked. People no consider it completely normal they are not paid for a specific task, but to serve a function like a machine. Before, a farmer was paid for his produce. A mason was paid for the buildings he constructed or parts thereof. The cobbler was paid for his shoes. and so on...

      Blame Andrew Carnegie and Charles Schwab (of US Steel, not his grandson of the broker fame) and their ilk. They looked upon us ignorant masses and decided to whip us into shape.

      --
      I don't read or respond to AC posts
    6. Re:Issues with the 8-hour work day by diggitzz · · Score: 1

      It's 8 hours because slavetrader^H^H^H^H^H^H^H managers *used* to insist on 10-16 hours ... until some laws came into effect requiring everything over 8hrs in one day (or 40hrs in a week, depending on where you live) to be overtime. This was about the same time child-labor laws and minimum wage came into effect. (I think it was in the 30's, but please correct me if I'm wrong ;)

      I'm glad I work in research where time seems non-existent, and deadlines are unheard of. My superiors are too busy to even notice if I just *disappear* for a few days so long as I don't miss a meeting or something ...

      --
      -=[You cannot consistently judge this statement to be true.]=-
    7. Re:Issues with the 8-hour work day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Why eight hours? Because of collective bargaining.

      Employers used to work their employees a lot more than they are legally allowed to today.

    8. Re:Issues with the 8-hour work day by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      do we still need the traditional eight-hour work day?

      Try collaborating with a group in a different timezone -- preferably overseas. When you only have an hour or two when everyone is "in the office", organization and communication becomes difficult and slow. The same thing would happen if everyone picked their own hours and days.


      So, since companies are already moving fast towards having multiple work sites around the world (such as USA, Israel, and India) in different timezones, and this is making everything slow, why not drop the 8-5 work hours thing altogether?

  36. Business 2.0? by Zico · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Um, weren't these guys one of the original hypemongers of the "new economy," telling us that the way dotcommers ran their business would become The Way? Yeah, I'll be sure to take their business suggestions real seriously. Now, why the hell should an employer have to pay for an employee doing personal things for "a few minutes or hours" (Hours?! Jesus.) when they're supposed to be helping improve the company?


    That and the second part about employees doing more work at home than goofing of at work all boil down to one thing: Learn how to manage your friggin' time properly and you won't have to worry about that.


    1. Re:Business 2.0? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, because having happy employees is not the way to improve The Company!
      Let's all have a moment of prayer for the all-mighty, supremely important Company.
      Who said that we live in an atheist society? We've replaced old gods with the new gods of work, the boss, and the Company. Amen.

    2. Re:Business 2.0? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That and the second part about employees doing more work at home than goofing of at work all boil down to one thing: Learn how to manage your friggin' time properly and you won't have to worry about that.

      Yeah right, in the last week I had to do data collection for a bunch of morons who didn't manage their time properly. And pray tell, how am I supposed to manage my time when I am "on call" 24x7

    3. Re:Business 2.0? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't have happy employees when some people are actually working hard for the money that they receive, and they see some jackoff screwing around on the job and making the same amount. -That's- what kills morale, you stupid marxist fuck.

    4. Re:Business 2.0? by Catiline · · Score: 1

      That and the second part about employees doing more work at home than goofing of at work all boil down to one thing: Learn how to manage your friggin' time properly and you won't have to worry about that.

      No, it breaks down into a simple choice: does your business want employees who will give their all from 9-5 M-F but are upset when asked to give more or give at any other time, or employees who will do what is needed reguardless of the amount of time required, or the time of request but might slack off when their services are less critical?

      On basis of that criterion alone, I personally would rather live in the second world, as either employee or manager.

    5. Re:Business 2.0? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So I'm a stupid fuck, but you love a society where, in YOUR OWN WORDS, a jackoff can make as much money as a hard worker? And I'm the stupid one? Yeah, keep believing all the shit you're fed, buddy, you're not ready to handle intelligence.

  37. Sometimes filtering is necessary by IAmTheSuit · · Score: 4, Informative

    I am the network admin at a small manufacturing company (~300 people, including plant workers). With the ever-increasing number of workstations available to low-skilled workers (especially after hours), there is a great temptation to mess around with the computer when the boss isn't looking. We've had hard drives and RAM stolen (solution), people drawing "creative" wallpaper in MS Paint (solution), and all sorts of other unproductive stuff.

    I'd love to be able to trust ALL network users, but unfortunately it is not possible in a manufacturing facility. If this was purely an office setting, then our T1 would be unrestricted.

  38. There's nothing wrong with posting form work! by TheNumberSix · · Score: 5, Funny

    I hate my job and so why should I care abo^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H

    ****BOSS NET FILTER ACTIVATED!****

    I love my job and want to apologize to the world for stealing company electrons for my own personal use. I am the happiest corporate drone of all time and would like to remind all employees that reading /. at work is stealing and might be a violation of the DMCA!

    --
    Never confuse feeling with thinking.
    1. Re:There's nothing wrong with posting form work! by FrostedWheat · · Score: 1

      and would like to remind all employees that reading /. at work is stealing and might be a violation of the DMCA!

      Does that include /. staff? Hey that might explain a lot ... :)

      *ducks*

    2. Re:There's nothing wrong with posting form work! by Anthony+Boyd · · Score: 1
      I love my job and want to apologize to the world for stealing company electrons for my own personal use. I am the happiest corporate drone of all time and would like to remind all employees that reading /. at work is stealing and might be a violation of the DMCA!

      Aeryn? Dammit, she's been cleansed by the Nebari! Again!

  39. How can you possibly monitor pr0n by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hit pr0n all the time, but not because I want to; rather because the company mandates I use an email program (Outlook) that insists on fetching all the remote content linked from the spam, so my computer is fetching pr0n all the time because I follow company policy (use the Outlook client, check my mail, don't change to a new address; all three company policies that I've complained about).

    I am pondering making a harassment complaint about the pr0n, as I consider it something forced on me by unreasonable company policy.

    I can't see how the company can do anything about pr0n access when their (stupid) policies are the culprit in my case.

  40. Re:Linux? by karlandtanya · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Works great if you can directly access the internet. Does your company use a proxy server? It keeps logs. Whatever comes through the server can be recorded before it ever gets to your box. And your requests are caught on the way out.


    Running a properly configured GNU/Linux system to solve that problem is like buying steel doors, deadbolts, window bars, and $3,000 security system for your house. Now, do you still have the UPS man leave your packages on the sill of the front door?


    Maybe you're spoofing your box's identity when you connect to the company's internet onramp? Swiped someone else's IP address, didja? That'd help, but there's still other things you'd have to consider.


    Try this, too:


    https://proxy.magusnet.com/-_-[your url here]

    --
    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away." - Philip K. Dick
  41. The Real Problem Is... by Salo2112 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm the guy stuck monitoring web usage where I work. We try to be reasonable, but it only takes one idiot to bring the world down on everyone. Our HR dept tells us we really can't handle issues on a case-by-case basis: we have to have a blanket policy that (in theory) applies to everyone. So the guy who does (or wants to do) a little banking from work is punished because some moron won't quit trying to get to pornobabes.com. As bad as it was when it was "no personal use of the internet," it became worse when we tried a "limited personal use of the internet" policy. We have met the enemy, and it is us....

    1. Re:The Real Problem Is... by moncyb · · Score: 1

      Ummm...so "no porn" isn't a blanket policy? Could've fooled me. Sounds like the people in your HR department are just a bunch of stupid incompetent bureaucrats. What happens if some idiot brings in a book full of sex and naked people then shows it to everyone? Will they ban all books or say it isn't porn?

    2. Re:The Real Problem Is... by Salo2112 · · Score: 1

      Our HR director is a lawyer, and had no HR experience. This director is more concerned with not getting employee lawsuits than actual productivity. Sort of a living example of "if your only tool is a hammer, all of your problems become nails". You may joke about the books, but we do have a "no unauthorized calenders" rule. The book thing is only a matter of one person being stupid enough to bring one in and getting noticed.

  42. Re:Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wouldn't the Win2k users (or any users for that matter) just be able to firewall incoming traffic?

  43. Are you sure they don't? by tiltowait · · Score: 3, Informative

    A recent survery found that the majority of US Businessess practice some form of computer workplace monitoring.

    1. Re:Are you sure they don't? by grub · · Score: 1

      Yes I'm sure. I'm the fellow that updates our PIX firewall rules and also runs the Squid/Privoxy machine. :)

      --
      Trolling is a art,
  44. Re:Linux? by Quill · · Score: 2, Funny

    PS: Don't bother coming in on Monday.

    Woohoo! Three day weekend!

    --
    My religion forbids the use of sigs.
  45. Re:If you cannot afford Internet at home by MisterFancypants · · Score: 1
    We fire folks who abuse the system weekly, and these jokers signed a paper stating that they understand the company policies on Internet/computer usage. What a bunch of babies.

    If you really fire folks for abusing Internet usage on a weekly basis, you REALLY, REALLY need to fire the people responsible for hiring all these asshats in the first place. They are the real problem.

  46. I need a net connection by ceswiedler · · Score: 3, Interesting

    1. As a programmer, I often have to learn new technologies and find new ways of doing things. Books are good, but there is nothing better than the internet. When I've had to do things like image compression (not my forte as a developer) I've blatantly 'stolen' code from various sites.

    2. As a programmer, I'm often presented with short minutes of downtime, while I recompile. My habit of switching to my browser at these moments is very deeply ingrained. The reason I read /. is because it's frequently updated with something new (and occasionally interesting) to read. I'm so used to this, that when I reboot, my first impulse is to switch to my browser. Then I realize that I can't, and I look around for a book or something.

  47. Pass me a hanky. by LazloToth · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "....employee morale is generally down when net controls are in place."

    Administrator morale is generally down when employees are free to download every spyware app known to man, then complain to IT about their Windoze boxes blowing up while they were entering their network passwords into Gator.

    --


    It's only funny until someone gets hurt. Then, it's hilarious.
    1. Re:Pass me a hanky. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      BINGO!

      Between Xupiter, WebShots, Bonzai buddy and believe it or not, netscape (JAVA2 runtimes hose our AD intergrated website) We were spending 4hrs a day doing "repairs" from the nite shift, a little squid, some creative rules and squidguard (We're thinking of moving to e smith with SAG) Our monday morning computer clean up is now 1/10 of what it was ,and uptime is up. All is good, and the client loves us so much that they want us to push this technology out more. I wasn't hired to be the internet police but the first time someone said " I can't get to a site I need to access" and I responded " Which non productive, non work related site do you need to get to Sir? since we only block harmful sites." was worth all the previous troubles. Mind you, this was a high ranking executive who we knew like to d/l gay pr0n from kazaa.

  48. Re:Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think the point isn't so much internet traffic in this case, but monitoring whatever shows up on the desktop. A little common sense can easily handle internet monitoring.

  49. Top 10 alternatives to the 1/2 hour on 'net by NaugaHunter · · Score: 1

    10) Discuss last night's Bachlorette/Weakest Link/Whatever with coworkers.
    9) Three words: Longer bathroom breaks
    8) Meetings
    7) Clean your area (tidy it up, not to leave.)
    6) Exercise by walking through all of the corridors in your building with a folder and a grimace.
    5) Clean and redraw your whiteboard
    4) Defrag your hard drive, in the interest of efficiency
    3) Review all your old emails, to catch anything that may have fallen through the cracks
    2) Read magazines/journals related to your business
    1) Take advantage of you boss's open door policy

    --
    R: That voice. Where have I heard that voice before? B: In about 365 other episodes. But I don't know who it is either.
  50. Just use an http tunnel by terradyn · · Score: 2, Informative

    You can just use httptunnel or any of the commercial products (www.loopholesoftware.com) out there to do all your secure browsing, chatting etc. It shows up as encrypted ssl web traffic so you don't have to worry about people watching everything you do. At my place of work, all web, phone and chat access is monitored through proxies. During the times when I need to unwind from the stress at work, it's good to be able to chat or browse /., etc. and then get back on track. I think people need diversions during the day to keep productive.

  51. I used to bust people by legLess · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The point of this rant is "trust but verify." I was pretty permissive about what people did, and almost everyone paid that back with respect for my requests. Some hard-line sysadmins I knew were always complaining of problems, and trying desperately to implement technical measures preventing people from (e.g.) shopping during their lunch hours. Consequently their users hated them. I had, and enforced, only one policy, trusting the users to make the best use of their own time. If they had a performance problem it was their manager's problem, not mine, and it was measured by actual work performance, not 'net access logs.

    When I ran the network for a 60-person architecture firm, I used to bust people for porn, but nothing else. Every new employee got the same schpiel: "Do what you want with your computer, aside from setting it on fire. See these settings here? They're company-wide. You can change 'em, but they'll be back in the morning. Here's where you make your own custom settings. You can't install anything from your browser, which is for your own security; ask me if you want to install anything else and I'll probably say yes. One thing - no porn."

    It worked well, and most people said it was much more lenient than other places they'd worked. The company's policy was "no porn" and I supported it whole-heartedly. I don't care if people watch porn, but doing it at work is (a) nasty and (b) begging for a lawsuit.

    I'd bust someone, usually a new hire, about every six months. Some of them did a brilliant job of sanitizing their machines, but they couldn't get to the proxy logs. They'd get a stern talking to by the principals, enough to make most of 'em wet themselves, 'specially when presented with a list of all the sites they visited, and we had no repeat offenders.

    --
    This isn't as much "normalization" as it is "don't take so many drugs when you're designing tables."
    1. Re:I used to bust people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I actually work (as a programmer) in the porn industry. I'm afraid the 'no porn' standard might not work so well at the office.

      Any suggestions on a better strategy for us?

    2. Re:I used to bust people by legLess · · Score: 1
      I actually work (as a programmer) in the porn industry. I'm afraid the 'no porn' standard might not work so well at the office. Any suggestions on a better strategy for us?
      Yeah, log anything containing the words "Moral Majority" and bust people for that :)
      --
      This isn't as much "normalization" as it is "don't take so many drugs when you're designing tables."
  52. I Can Remember This 15Years Ago by mrs+clear+plastic · · Score: 2

    This is old. I can remember a few of my jobs
    where monitoring was close, if not closer than
    what I see today.

    One of them was where I was working for the
    Department of Defense. We all worked in an open
    area. The desks were set up like desks in a large
    classroom. There were not deviders or partitions.

    In front of the room was the glass enclosed (not
    frosted glass, mind you, but the clear kind)
    office of the manager. He might has well had
    his desk in front, just like my teacher when I
    was a little boy in school.

    4 people shared each phone. The computer terminals
    were on tables along one side of the room, also
    in plain site of the manager's. office.

    No newspapers were allowed. If you spent too
    much time talking with someone, the manager is
    bound to notice and look up with a frown.

    A buzzer sounded at 7 AM when the workday started.
    The horn of the lunch truck signaled the beginning
    of lunch. A buzzer sounded at 3:30 in the
    afternoon for the day's. end.

    Another job I had was in a high security
    environment. A closed circuit TV camera was
    mounted in one corner of the room, visible to
    all desks. The person at the monitor for that
    camera could see all of us and what we were
    doing.

    IMHO, this is monitoring.

    Mark

    --
    Cleara
    1. Re:I Can Remember This 15Years Ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      IMHO, this is monitoring.
      Thats a really astute observation. How come your not a detective.
    2. Re:I Can Remember This 15Years Ago by orthogonal · · Score: 1

      A buzzer sounded at 7 AM when the workday started.
      The horn of the lunch truck signaled the beginning
      of lunch. A buzzer sounded at 3:30 in the
      afternoon for the day's. end (sic).


      Sounds like prison. Or a sweatshop.

    3. Re:I Can Remember This 15Years Ago by YetAnotherDave · · Score: 1

      >> Sounds like prison. Or a sweatshop.

      or a job where you work for a living.

      It was like that when I worked at a sawmill, and for that it was fine, but it'd be $%#@$ irritating at a tech job...

    4. Re:I Can Remember This 15Years Ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats a really astute observation. How come your not a detective.
      How come you don't spell check?

  53. ever hear of ssh tunnel by codepunk · · Score: 1

    Just set up a ssh tunnel from your desktop to your home computer....problem solved, sniff that bitch...

    --


    Got Code?
  54. my employer got rid of web filtering by amigabill · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure what the reason was really, perhaps it wasn't helpful, perhaps it got in our way too much, or perhaps the company just didn't want to pay for it anymore in this frugal economy, but we don't have it anymore.

    When we did, it was the WebSense filtering tool. It was annoying as it had a tendency to block sites useful for work, such as looking up something about Perl scripting, and other things. And it also didn't encourage us to stay late to wait for simulations or chip place/route operations to complete, which was nearly all computer time, and start the next step in whatever the design flow was. Staring at the screen or the wall got boring, and less people stayed after hours, especially as we're mostly salary and don't get overtime or any other benefits as a reason not to go home "on time". At least the web has news or some other interesting stuff to keep us occupied while the CPU chugs away on a couple-hour-long (sometimes couple-day-long) job.

    Ironically, our sys admin tried to update the WebSense stuff one time and the filter blocked WebSense's own web site. :) How useful that was...

    1. Re:my employer got rid of web filtering by Dawn+Falcon · · Score: 1

      "Ironically, our sys admin tried to update the WebSense stuff one time and the filter blocked WebSense's own web site. :) How useful that was..."

      I think that comment says a LOT about the usefulness of censorware.

  55. Smoke Breaks by LordYUK · · Score: 1

    Is it any worse than the employee who takes 15 10 minute smoke breaks a day? Not to mention the time they wander around the office looking confused, or the time they spend chatting with coworkers...

    Is it really that much worse? No one seems to mind that, yet we surf for ten minutes and we're looked on as lazy thieves stealing corporate hours...

    --
    This is my sig. Its pathetic.
  56. Slightly Off-topic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Interestingly enough, a few days back I was working in one of the computer labs at my university (Toronto, Canada) which didn't have classes at the time. After about 20 minutes, a student comes in and finding no place to sit, went and sat the computer connected to the digital projecter and the large screen. Guess he was new or something. Anyway, he had to sit facing us all (about 40 PCs) and started doing some docs. After about 15 mins, he started surfing porn sites (not blocked BTW) and opening movies! And it was shown up by the projecter on to the 52" screen! About 10 of use were just staring at the screen, quite shocked. This guy never even looked at us giggling about it. After a few minutes, somebody actually called security, and they came and called him away.

    Well, moral : stay away from not doing work at work.

  57. Monitoring software not the biggest problem... by DigitalDad · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Where I work (a 250 bed hospital), every employee who has a desk has a computer which is wired to the network. We also have monitoring software which can and does monitor the outbound traffic. Being one of two network admins (it's a large network) part of my responsability is to make sure that no one ABUSES the priviledge of being able to surf the web. Don't get me wrong, company policy states the usuall "no personal business at work", but it's very loosly enforced. Recently I have been having to more closely monitor the traffic becuse there were a few individuals that were spending most of their time visiting porn sites - some of them nurses. The thing is, everyone jumps to accuse corporate policy about monitoring, but the problem really lies in the few employees that abuse the privilage.

    --


    My good sig is in the laundry
  58. All hail Cthulhu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > I, for one, welcome our calamari overlords.

    Absolutely, but why stop at a single company? In the next election, vote Cthulhu for president. Don't settle for immidations:
    http://www.cthulhu.org/

  59. Re:Take days off?-Cell Phone. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is one of the pluses of a cell phone. I can call whenever, and whomever, at any location, without even touching the bosses equipment. And with the new phones, one can even access the web.

  60. Salvador Dali Is My Cousin by Acidic_Diarrhea · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    You compare the guy that wants to do banking to the guy who wants to look at boobies and say that the banker isn't doing anything wrong when the guy looking at porno is. I think you should realize that the problem with people using the "Internet" for personal use during work is that while they're doing that, they're not working. It doesn't matter if an employee is banking or looking at snatch - either way it's leading to employees not working. So a limited use seems fine. If some guy wants to spend his limited amount of time per day going over his finances, that should be fine. Likewise, if some guy wants to look at jiggly bigglies, as long as he keeps his pants on and is fairly discrete about it, that should be fine too. If you're going to allow personal use, fucking allow it! I don't think you understand what you're monitoring for at all. This is why you're the monitor guy and not the manager guy. Take a class in business and you might come around. Happy employees are good employees. So as long as they're still productive, let them use the Internet for whatever they want for a limited period of time, as long as those mothertruckers aren't breaking the law.

    --
    I hate liberals. If you are a liberal, do not reply.
  61. We monitor by gmerideth · · Score: 1

    We monitor, using a combination of two programs, all web traffic (without blocking), email and ftp traffic as well as (a nice battle) block all IM programs.

    Our employee's know we do this and honestly over the past six years I dont think they really care. Our productivity hasn't diminshed and overall employee's are happy in the offices.

    But, unlike the cut and dry approach of some larger corporations we use a common sense approach to things. If your log shows you looked at the playboy website, either through an errant link or a direct lookup once, then we see no true harm. If the same employee is looking at playboys website every day, then we email him a simple (dont do this at work) message and 99.9% of the time they "get it".

    Maybe it's because were a smaller company (45) but I really dont mind if at lunch or even while doing proposals someone wants spend 5 minutes and look at the last interception of the superbowl.

    We monitor and to a degree, restrict, and our employees dont care.

    --
    Why do overlook and oversee mean opposite things?
  62. Oh my God! A thinking manager! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now if only there were more managers out there like you...

  63. Christina Ricci Is My Cousin by Acidic_Diarrhea · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    Whoa whoa whoa, why so hostile towards blue collars? They may not have as much education as the more costly employees but everyone will be interested in seeing how far they can push the management. I think you're a bit pretentious about all this. Are you insecure about your place in the world? Listen, even if those "monkeys" [as you call them] can use a computer, they'll never know as much as you. So don't worry, okay buddy?

    Long story short: you can never just trust all network users - regardless of their education or how much they make. There's always going to be someone in a group of employees who will abuse the system. That's why you have to be vigilante. Remember what Uncle Ben said, "With great power, comes great responsibility."

    --
    I hate liberals. If you are a liberal, do not reply.
    1. Re:Christina Ricci Is My Cousin by IAmTheSuit · · Score: 1

      Hold on there. I think you're reading much more into my comment than I intended. At no point did I use the word "monkeys".

      In fact, they obviously aren't dumbasses, because they got around whatever policy we had in place and started dicking around with Paint. I have since identified the hole (Motherboard Monitor's reporting in IE carries the System account's credentials with it) in the security plan and fixed it (no more MBM).

      Sure, most employees try to get around roadblocks put on computer systems, which was exactly the point of the article. The trick is deciding who to block and how restrictive to be. Unfortunately, that means asking Management, "How much freedom should be given to users?" This is their call, not mine.

      In an office-type setting, there are a set of tasks to be done, and as long as they are done well and on a timely basis, the management should not care what the employees do otherwise, including in some cases just going home. Manufacturing is different in that there is a certain process that requires carefully coordinated functions. If an employee is too busy drawing in Paint and lets a bunch of green parts fall to the floor, we have a problem.

      Most manufacturing positions are not nearly as autonomous as desk jobs generally are.

      In ALL businesses, computers are not toys. They are tools that in the end improve profits.

  64. Just for Spite: by Fapestniegd · · Score: 1

    Block This:
    ssh -L 3128:squidserver:3128 squidserver
    Now I set my proxy to localhost:3128

    Of course The snoops sure do see a lot of ssh traffic to my house.
    Damn Maybe I should have checked [] Post Anonymously.

  65. THey can see what I'm looking at by Rudy+Rodarte · · Score: 1

    But I don't care about that. What I hate is that they have the network set up so I cannot look at anything but Windows Media Player Files. No realplayer, no quicktime. Nada

    1. Re:THey can see what I'm looking at by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you happen to work for Bill Gates and Microsoft??? ROFL

  66. Productivity needs to stay high by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1
    At my last job I was permitted to go on the internet during lunch hour but I was told not go during my usual work hours. I honored this and you have to relize that hundreds of white collar jobs cost a corporation tens of thousands of dollars an hour. Just 20 minutes of web browsing a day for half of the employees can costs tens if not hundreds of millions in lost productivity a year!

    I am not standing up for this but just rather giving you the alternative view point. Infact according to the gartner group a coffee maker can cost an office over 30k a year. Because people chat at the coffee maker instead of working at their desks. Yes bussinesses are so desperate these days they are looking into things like banning coffee makers. Now in alot of companies like UPS for example, not only are coffee makers banned but you can not evem bring coffee to your desk. No shit. Studies have showed a %15 drop in productivity so ban it for %15 more profits is the motto by management.

    I know this sounds silly but the economy sucks and your competition doing everything possible to save money and you have a responsiblity to your shareholders to outperform them. This is why they are transfering all the white colar jobs to India. If they don't there competitors will. Same is true for the China syndrome. Lets market to CHina because our competitors are doing it. Turns out they are poor and its not the magical market some would like it to be.

    Morale be dammed. Just bring in the most possible money possible with the least amount of time. This is effeciany.

    This is why I would love to work for the government or a University. Stuff thats happening in corporate America is just crazy and I want no part in it.

    1. Re:Productivity needs to stay high by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I work at UPS, and contrary to your information, not only are coffe makers not banned, but in fact, the company opays for the supplies. I have the geek pleasure of sitting right next to the coffee and doughnuts, and I would say that increases my productivity (caffeiene!) The management also has lunch delivered frequently. I would say that from that aspect, UPS is the opposite of many companies. While cutting costs, they encourage some expenses for employee comfort.

    2. Re:Productivity needs to stay high by 0123456 · · Score: 1

      "Infact according to the gartner group a coffee maker can cost an office over 30k a year. Because people chat at the coffee maker instead of working at their desk"

      Meanwhile, a five-minute chat about a software issue with one of the other programmers at the coffee maker can easily be more productive than a two-hour meeting with a dozen programmers and a couple of managers.

      Installing more coffee makers and eliminating meetings could save an office many tens or hundreds thousands of dollars a year... particularly as you could probably sack half the managers who spend all their time in meetings and very little time hanging around the coffee maker where all the important software decisions are made.

  67. The line between work and home is thinning... by cygnusx · · Score: 1
    ... don't remember the link, but office-goers in both the US and UK are working longer hours on average, thanks to an increasing number of firms allowing workers to 'dial in' from home. I think Mark Pilgrim put it very well:
    Now there is no after work, there is no before work, there is no work day, no office, no clock. There is only one long continuous 24-hour day that is always work, always office, and I never punch in and I never punch out.
    Given this, I think a little non-work browsing at work is only fair.

  68. Sane Monitoring by NetJunkie · · Score: 1

    I think web monitoring is a good idea, but I don't like blocking. We monitor with WebSense but do not block anything. I prepare reports for managers that show the most common categories of sites people visit, but not with individual info. If surfing to "bad" sites becomes an issue a VP will send out a reminder email that we do monitor and CAN crack down if needed. The next day the "bad" sites stop showing up.

    Treat your employees like professionals and you'll usually get the result you want. We allow "reasonable" personal use of the systems. But, if someone spends too much time online that's just like spending too much time on the phone or smoking.

  69. Net filtering can be unreasonable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I already know what a lot of people will say:

    Work is work, you're not there to surf the net.

    Agreed, we are not at work to play.. but humans were not built to work, it is only sensible that we have some amenities to make it more comfortable. That's why you sit in a chair and not on the floor, etcetera.

    Look at net usage the same way as telephone usage. When you need to use it, the telephone is there.. you can even call your friends on your break, as long as it doesn't cost the company money. But you'd be outraged if they were monitoring your calls. Just because it happens inside their building does not make it their business that you and your friend are discussing his divorce. Of course, some people abuse the priveledge of having a phone.. but they are eventually found out when they don't produce any work. The same thing goes for the internet. Use it, but don't abuse it, or you won't get any work done.

    Here at my work, they recently changed the web filtering system. The official policy states that the only categories you are not permitted to access from work are: hate speech/hate propaganda, copyright violating material, or pornography. That's fine, if you ask me, anyone doing any of that stuff at work is asking for it.

    But the *NEW* software has many many categories blocked.. including anything to do with the word "game".

    I don't play games at work.. besides the fact that we don't have crazy geforce cards of course, it's just wrong. But on my lunch hour i like to peruse some gaming sites, see what's new, what's good, what's not worth even renting.. but since the new filtering software was installed, any attempt to read a gaming review only gets me a page informing me (AND my supervisor) that i have attempted to reach a site in a blocked category.. and then refers them to the list (which as i said, contains only hate speech, copyright violations, and pornography).

    It's one thing for them to have a policy, it's a completely different thing to list those but then make me look like some kind of rule-breaking miscreant when i only want to read something to fill the last part of my lunch break.

  70. de minimis by mekkab · · Score: 1

    The full expression is de minimis non curat lex. This is a Latin phrase which means "the law does not care about very small matters". It can be used to describe a component part of a wider transaction, where it is in itself insignificant or immaterial to the transaction as a whole, and will have no legal relevance or bearing on the end result.

    Is taking a pen from work stealing? What about paper?

    Its one of those "crimes" that aren't crimes.

    Who knows, maybe I'm just morally bankrupt and will go to hell for my life of free red pens and internet access.

    if that's the case, I might as well download the YATTA quick time again!

    "G....R.....double E....N....LEAVES!"

    --
    In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
    1. Re:de minimis by vsprintf · · Score: 1

      You got red pens at work?

      Damn. I had to take red pens to work, and I figured the blue ones I got in exchange were small compensation.

    2. Re:de minimis by mekkab · · Score: 1

      Yup! It made my life as a grader for a Data Structures class a whole lot easier. Students respect the "RED PEN" on their assignments.

      --
      In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
    3. Re:de minimis by pstemari · · Score: 1
      Is taking a pen from work stealing?
      Heh. The feds used to have "Property of the US Government" embossed on the side of every pen.
  71. All day websurfing is a sign of other problems by Proc6 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    If you have to block net access, or monitor everyone's every move, your business is set up wrong. Try a little something like this...
    • Hire decent, reliable people. (seriously, who can't point to half the people they work with and go, "why were they hired in the first place?") You should be able to tell based on their interview, credentials, past performance, etc, if you are about to hire a responsible person, or a day-trading addict. If you can't, maybe you shouldn't be the one hiring people. Find someone who can.
    • Give people work to do, and expect it gets done on time. If you have an employee that CAN piss away 7 hours reading Slashdot, then you should probably "down-size" them. How about assign projects, give them a reasonable time to do it, and let them do it. If they can do the work well, and give themselves some free-time to surf, hey, whatever. If they surf the whole time, and the deadline rolls around and nothing is done or the work is shoddy. "goodbye".
    • Check on your employees once in awhile. Do managers just have teams they never talk to? Yes, probably, the manager himself is probably in his office beating off to goatce.sx. How about hire managers that round robin their employees, staying in touch with them, checking on them, helping them. You'll find those idiots that always seem to have Minesweeper on the screen when you walk in, real fast. No need for Big Brother.
    You shouldnt be hiring humans if you want robotic fixed patterns of movements and actions. I dont know about everyone else, but very much of the time Im staring off into space or glancing at CNN.com, the problems at hand are bubbling around in my head, imaginging the scenarios out, taking in the big picture of the project... then when I lay hands to keyboard, I do it once, and I do it right. It just seems to me, it should never have to get as far as this elementary school spy bullshit.
    --

    I'm Rick James with mod points biatch!

  72. Re:SSH Tunnel(on port 80 or 81) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    do it over port 80 or 81 and they will need some advanced packet monitoring software. If that becomes common I'm sure there will be a way to bypass that by having a special version of SSH that uses what looks like HTTP requests and sends.

  73. Re:YOU MUST LIVE IN SOVIET RUSSIA by mr_z_beeblebrox · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Come on people....-1 and he hacked the Gibson. I say FUNNY

  74. Jay Leno Is My Cousin by Acidic_Diarrhea · · Score: 1
    You called them monkeys! Why deny it pigeon?

    Looking over your comment (skimming really; you certainly do go on at length, don't you? I hope no one lets you hold meetings.) I can see your point. You believe that blue collars have less interesting work and therefore are more often looking for ways to goof around. This is a good point and one I had not considered when replying to you. Thank you for clearing this issue up.

    That being said, would I be misquoting you if I were to state that you said, "Hey guys, let's go cornhole some blue collar chimps in the breakroom. We'll use the big black anal dildo!"

    --
    I hate liberals. If you are a liberal, do not reply.
    1. Re:Jay Leno Is My Cousin by IAmTheSuit · · Score: 1

      Shew, you're cynical.

      Thank you for making my point concisely. That is exactly what I was looking for. If someone is dicking around with computer security during his "spare" time, perhaps he should be given a more mentally stimulating position.

      And yes, that would be a misquote. In the words of a CS friend of mine, "Ass != sex" (The Morgan Theorem). IMHO, that goes for everyone!

  75. We simply published the proxy logs. by Moderation+abuser · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Every week, the proxy logs were automatically collated and sorted by userid[1] and bandwidth used, then posted to a web site. All completely automatically. It took about 30mins to set up. The logs linked from the internal corporate web site so everyone in the company can see them and all the employees (several tens of thousands) were informed that their web viewing habits would be published.

    There was a couple of porn sites and some *serious* bandwidth hogs the first few weeks, but nothing since. I can't imagine a reason to hire people specifically to do this kind of crap, sounds like someone has too much money.

    [1] You have to login to the gateway proxies.

    --
    Government of the people, by corporate executives, for corporate profits.
    1. Re:We simply published the proxy logs. by DancingSword · · Score: 1

      Brilliant!! why didn't I perceive this?!

      --
      Messages to/for me ( in me journal )
    2. Re:We simply published the proxy logs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ouch. I'd have left that company in about 10 minutes after the announcement.

  76. Oh my god by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are using that damn t3 line, that is leased anyway. You are using as much as 200 watts of electricity every SECOND. My bad, haven't you noticed that you waste more energy & resources while PISSING in the corporate bathroom than while surfing after work?
    I would suggest reading the article again. Than you would fcking know that YES it is using corporate resources, but YES it benefits the corporation by creating loyalty among the employees. Pr0n & alcohol is out of the question whilst at work, but fragging away on the corporate network after hours is ridiculous to forbid.

    Imagine this scenario: Admin & Co-Workers are having some unpaid "overtime" checking out that new quake map. Ok, leased lines, paid by volume, it costs their employer money. Max. 20 bucks per gig, while one gig lasts 24 hours online gaming, cheaper than paper, but ok, lets assume it's costing money. But now hehe, something goes wrong, imagine a fire in the NAS-compartment or a serious hacker in the R&D-server. Four people still on the premises and notice instantly that somethings wrong with the network, they smell fire or notice that funny LED blinkin'. They quit their game, rescue valuable corporate assets by taking the fire extinguisher and finish off that small piece of chinese crap electronics while it is still slowly smoking. Voilà, the corporation just saved a million $$$. Never underestimate the value of workers doing late overtime.

    Something can happen and will happen eventually, and then you've got one of your employees at the right place and the right time.

  77. Oh please... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Life has a lot going on, and sometimes you are forced to wait till the last minute on some things. I highly doubt the poster suggests waiting till the last minute for everything they do.
    Do you have a family?... kids? Probably not. They're HUGE time sinks.

    1. Re:Oh please... by Mark+Pitman · · Score: 1
      Do you have a family?... kids? Probably not. They're HUGE time sinks.

      Yes, I do have a family. As a matter of fact I have 3 kids. I'm not saying I agree with blocking ALL personal use of the web at work. If you read my initial post, my point was how silly it is to say that "since I can't spend 5 minutes at work taking care of something, I have to take a whole day off work to do it instead," which is basically what the posting says. (Although if you read the actual article they don't word it quite the same as the /. post does.)

  78. You should see what's on the drives... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At a company I worked for I was once requested by a corporate level higher-up to check out the PC of a local district manager. Apparently they noticed a lot of activity to some, um, content inappropriate for the workplace. So I went there to have a look see. The manager was there, behind his PC. I let him know that I needed to take a peek through his machine. "Sure," he says. So I checked his browse history. Hmm, nothing there. Look at his bookmarks. Pretty clean. The manager is very confident and sits back to drink his coffee. Finally I start checking through the on-disk cache. Bingo. Wow. I was startled. Pictures of men and women doing things with winebottles, animals, you name it. Plus lots and lots of ads, banners, animated gifs...
    He gave some excuse about how the employees were always checking their COMPANY email on this machine. Maybe one of them did it. Deflect deflect etc.. Seeing what I saw, I couldn't bring myself to shake his hand before leaving.

  79. This is so true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nobody found out here before, it seems. The amount of work you're getting done counts, not the hours you are at your desk. Or is it really like Dilbert in RL?

    Some say it is already too late. Attendance is what counts. First one to come, last one to go is employer of the month every time. No one cares if he does insane lunch breaks and ten walks to the copier per hour. But hey, productivity isn't needed anymore. But kissing asses. The final sign that corporations, that have reached budgets of some corrupt south american states are beginning to behave like them. Loyalty to your employer is measured in a lower salary than appropriate and efficiency is irrelevant, as long as you are the last one to leave your office. if you still have one and not a damn chicken farm lookalike cubicle.

    1. Re:This is so true by Cromac · · Score: 2, Interesting
      The amount of work you're getting done counts, not the hours you are at your desk. Or is it really like Dilbert in RL?

      Unfortunately in the real world it's most often the perception of work done rather than the actual work done that is rewarded and the larger the corporation the more that seems to be true.

  80. Re:Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, that's why he's a troll.

  81. Hate it, but necessary evil by Phrack · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Gotta do it.. gotta parse those Snort logs and see what's been crossing the wire. At this company, no one cares if you take a break and catch up on the scores, political news, slashdot, etc... but when 19 unique PORN signatures show up (about 250 total hits) for a month, that's out of line. And when your Gnutella habits suck up half the available upstream circuit, you're also out of line. You're paid to work, to complete a set of tasks and move on to the next set. No one denies the occasional break, especially if previous job performance shows good work. But, you're not paid to swap files or check out hentai. Deal with it.

    Personally, it depresses me.. I despise the times I have to check the logs, knowing that some coworkers cannot seem to maintain some professionalism, even if they aren't being actively managed at 2am.

    --
    Dump the IRS - http://www.fairtax.org
  82. it's the company's perogrative/blackmail tool by collapser · · Score: 1
    • chances are, it's somewhere in the contract. RTFC, before you sign. If you don't like the idea of *your usage of *somebody else's bandwidth being monitored, then don't sign
    • I have worked for companies that have had no monitoring - in one situation, net access was not neccessary, with the exception of 1. email and 2. two or three related company sites (it was an loan application firm). controls could have been set to block all else (fair enough IMO), but they didn't, leading to certain (but not all) individuals going to pr0n sites half the day and pulling up sex4a/offensive videos. This pissed me off since it was mostly offensive to see someone in a higher position than me jerking around when they should have been doing what was expected of them at that level (i left shortly after)
    • I would recommend anyone that doubts the effects of net access on the small minded to drop in at my university course. Most of the classes are in computer labs where the tutor can't see the screens. Of course most people (including myself sometimes), rather than go to java.sun.com|whatever, mess about at hotmail/newgrounds/etc. After two years, we now have 25% of the students we started with (bad grades etc). Therefore net misuse can be seen as an *rough indicator of that employees effectiveness.
    • I have myself been busted for misuse of email, (which I only viewed during my lunch breaks - god knows I had a lot of work to get through each day) and fired as a result (it was a cynical humor mailing list). Somewhat amusingly, rumor got around that the content was sexual (untrue), and via chinese whispers this led to a rather puzzling phone call:
      boss: they also said that a lot of it was about homosexuality
      me: well, it was a unfiltered HUMOR mailing list. and only a small proportion of it mentioned that anyway. it's hardly indicative of the material I was recieving. You haven't seen the emails have you?
      boss: yeah, but some of it was gay
      me: I said it was a humor mailing list. it is bound to touch on that subject at some point. I don't think its possible for anyone in their right mind to consider them salacious or derogatory, either.
      boss:(ignoring me completely) Are you gay?
      me: whaaat?
      boss: Are you gay?
      me:(dumbfounded that they are asking such a question)um, what?
      boss: Are you gay?
      this went on and on until i realised i really didn't want to be working for these people (i'm not gay, incidentally);
      me: uh, whatever.. yeah, i'm gay..
      boss: you will recieve your final paycheque nextweek, minus the estimated* cost of your misuse of the email account.

      I admit I was stupid to get caught in the first place (i was quite young then), but what really pissed me off (and still does) was the amount of money that they valued email at - so 356 kb of bandwith managed to cost me 4/5ths of my monthly paycheck. =). niiiiiiiice.
      oh, and none of this was in the contract either, never mind that in-work recreational net use was rampant there amongst other staff during work hours.
      </RANT>
    --
    <B>note to self:</B> <I>post as html</I>
  83. No surf at work then no work at home by Zed2K · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I work from home on weekends sometimes and I surf and do personal stuff at work sometimes. Its a trade-off as far as I'm concerned. If they ever complained or took it away at work then they would see me in at 9 out at 5, right on the dot. I also wouldn't be doing any work at home. They don't trust me then I won't go the extra mile for them.

  84. Re:If you cannot afford Internet at home by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this is because you cannot fire your mom... stop trying.

  85. net controls caused bankruptcy! by limber · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yeah, my friend works for a company that sets up porn sites, and he said when I.T. implemented Net filtering, productivity went down the tubes... :-)

  86. THAT DOES IT! by thrillbert · · Score: 2, Funny

    employee morale is generally down when net controls are in place

    Firings will continue until morale improves!

    ---
    Which is worse: ignorance or apathy? Who knows? Who cares?

  87. relax in work!? virus at work.. blah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, the stupid users, thinks that all is free, and that they do a favor to employer, blah!

    And they make work extra to SysAdmin, because they download virus..

    Slow the internet speed and audite all of them. Disable download of mp3, vbs, ocx, dll, and whatever that is not text... shield up firewall.. The internet is good but only is you do in your home... ahh and don't take your home-disk to work.

    I wish that don't exist virus, trojan, evil, then no throuble using internet. But, this is real life, and virus coder sukz

    And I never will read the answer for this post, because I go to work.
    So, enjoy!

    Im not coward, Im don't have time to register ever.

  88. Sooner or later... by MamasGun · · Score: 1

    ...you can reduce every business story to an "Office Space" quote. It's amazing but true. And keep your hands off my red Swingline stapler, buddy. ;-)

    --
    "But you've already got a DVD. It lasts forever....In the digital world, we don't need back-ups..."
    -- Jack Valenti
  89. Sounds interesting but I can't read it right now by sootman · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I'm still trying to download the Animatrix.

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  90. Internet abuse versus human larynx abuse by ewg · · Score: 1

    The most abused piece of communication gear at my place of work isn't the router, it's the human voice box:

    Sports talk, car talk, parenting talk, movie talk, vacation talk, marriage talk, tech talk, ...

    --
    org.slashdot.post.SignatureNotFoundException: ewg
  91. bzzt... by _avs_007 · · Score: 1

    That's assuming you don't get put on hold. If at work, you could just have your headsets/speakerphone on, and continue with your work until someone comes on the line. Also, while doing this at 6am sounds all fine and dandy, you are forgetting about commute time. Sometimes if you aren't out-the-door by 6-6:30, your commute time starts to rise at a higher than linear rate.

  92. Easy To Circumvent by FsG · · Score: 1
    We're nerds, so why do we even care what policies they set? It is, after all, extremely easy to circumvent them and browse whatever the heck you want, safe in the knowledge that you're probably not being monitored (I know, keystroke loggers, etc..) I'm sure somebody here has already mentioned SSH tunnels, and us ultra-nerds have no problem setting them up. For the rest of the world (as well as those who don't leave their boxen on 24/7), there are free services like https://megaproxy.com which is, as the name suggests, an HTTPS-secured web proxy system.

    You go to that page, type in which site you want to visit, and you're off to that site, and off the company's squid radar. At school, I use it every day to read forbidden bulletin boards that are blocked by the school's squid-based proxy.

    --
    I made a PHP/MySQL library that prevents SQL injection & makes coding easier!
  93. Re:Take days off?-Cell Phone. by _avs_007 · · Score: 1

    That's assuming your cell phone can get a signal from your cave, err I mean cube...

  94. I'm unemployed by Chocolate+Teapot · · Score: 1

    You insensitive clod!

    --
    Modest doubt is called the beacon of the wise. - William Shakespeare
  95. not really by _avs_007 · · Score: 1

    I do it all the time. In fact we are encouraged to tele-commute from home. So I swap files all the time between home/work. I assume pushing/pulling work to/from work&home is a reasonable use? YMMV

  96. You want it the other way around? by Threed · · Score: 1

    No problem... Spend the next ten minutes reading Slashdot if you want, but then I want a good 40 hours out of you before you go home. Better get cracking.

  97. Games, work, focus... by j3110 · · Score: 1

    Off topic perhaps, but:

    What is it about gaming that works so well to help focus? In some places it is being used as a treatment for ADD. I know my development team was overworked badly at one point, and we still managed to get the project done on time by working 80 hour week by taking 30 minute half-life breaks every 2 hours. Actual programming time was probably only a 60h week, but I never was tired like you get after you program for that much. We had clean code that didn't need a much debugging at all.

    It would be a cool study to figure out if there is any chemical/physical reason this is so. Perhaps when you play a game you are using another part of your brain that is overactive until that part is tired, while the chemicals used to fire neurons or just raw energy or even oxygen comes back to the logical reasoning parts of the brain.

    It's kind of like stairing at a light that only has one color... like the old orange/green monitors... after a while, you can't see that color as bright as before. I guess as programmers, we sometimes forget that we are organic and can't work like a computer.

    --
    Karma Clown
    1. Re:Games, work, focus... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One guy at my last job said he read an article that cited a study (ugh!) that gaming has the same effect on a person as REM sleep. Or some such. I never actually saw the article or the study, so who knows?

  98. Re:Linux? by catch23 · · Score: 1

    They haven't cared for me. I run 3 Linux desktop stations and I've even asked for 3 static ip addresses and they didn't care. They sent this IT support guy to help me configure my static ip addresses but was completely dumbfounded when he sat at my terminal (which was running blackbox). You shoulda seen his face.... he's like where's "My Computer??"

    My company technically only supports Windows95, NT, and 2000. (Believe it or not, but 90% of the company still uses that 8 year old operating system win95)

  99. Hypocrites by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    I once wanted to order some old books from ebay in order to get an older version of Internet Explorer for testing for compabilities with older machines, but ebay was blocked. I had to order it at home.

    I just read that NASA has to buy shuttle parts off of ebay in order to get vintage electronics that are compatable. Kind of hard to do if ebay is blocked.

    On another note, it is hard for most people to do the same thing for 8+ hours a day. People want variety to refresh themselves. High level managers often gab for hours about food, sports, and other personal stuff. I don't see anybody policing that. It is a double-standard if you ask me.

  100. I don't know about you by Blikbok · · Score: 1
    But for the past 4 years, checking Slashdot has been part of my job.

    Seriously. Educated managers who are competent understand that some unobvious tasks are work related.

  101. Re:As a manager I don't care (TRANSLATION!) by Dread_ed · · Score: 1

    Ahhh...Crikey! Look!! A manager in grunt territory! Let's take a gander and see what he has to say...

    "As a manager I don't care if my employees surf the web at work."

    Here we have the typical "blowing smoke up your ass" maneuver. I seen it a thousand times...they lull you into a false sense of security with talk like this and then WHAMMO...pink slip city when they catch you on www.bangbus.com. Happens every time...sad it is.

    "When I assign them a task I have a good idea how long it should take."

    The "idea" he has is based upon a proprietary formula taught to all "managers" at manager school. Factor the relative meekness and subservience of employee X into the number of ass-licking sessions contributed per day by said employee, then multiply by the inverse of the percentage chance that employee X has pictures of you with the gay midgets at the christmas party. There's a few more steps in this formula that ultimately results in a seed number used to decide whether you give Joe Blow a completely unreasonable ammount of time to finish his project, or just an absurdly inadequate one.

    "If Joe Blow always takes longer than expected, I'll fire him, web surfing or not."

    Yep.

    "If Jane Bleep routinely finishes her work ahead of time, I'll make sure she gets the biggest raise, come evaluation time..."

    Hmmm...the females get preferrential treatment. Sentence structure and syntax will reveal why. "Jane gets"..."the biggest raise", "Come evaluation time", "finishes her work a-head of time". Oh, and what expletive is the "Bleep" covering up?? Yes, yes, yes, poor "manager" is sexually frustrated and yearns to replace all his "Joe Blows" with a harem of "Jane Hummers."

    Strange animal this, "manager." Trecherous and beguiling. Best to keep your distance and always watch your back!

    --
    When the only tool you have is a claw hammer every problem starts to look like the back of someone's skull.
  102. Monitoring Doesn't work by Like2Byte · · Score: 3, Informative

    I used to work for a company that did this. It was a great place to work and socialize. We'd go out after hours to relax together - all 30 to 40 of us.

    We all got our work done before deadlines.

    Then the 'management' instituted this internet/mail watch. One video clip e-mailed *to* me later wound up hurting 15 guys on the cc list. The guy who sent it was banned from the net. The rest of us were all banned from the net for 30 days and we didn't even have to have seen it. I hadn't even checked my mail before they summoned us into one room to chew us all out.

    I left the company three weeks later over this as did several others. Now, for the people that still work there, they say the company morale sucks and morale was never like it was from 1998 to 2000. Too bad, too. Really great bunch of people they were.

    Now, the company has gone through four layoffs and is working with a skeleton crew.

  103. Children abound by muzzmac · · Score: 1

    Where I work the controls are almost non-existant on where people go.

    Staff can get audited on what they do for any number of reasons.

    The number of people who get sacked for doing absoultely stupid shit is ridiculous.

    Our companies Internet policy says you can use the Internet for non-work related purposes as long as it doesn't become a problem to you performing your job. (And some clauses around innappropriate material) A fairly moderate policy.

    And too many people still behave like children.

    Goodbye!

  104. Re:As a manager I don't care (TRANSLATION!) by Alomex · · Score: 1


    Not that you are bitter or anything... =)

  105. hahaha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    there were a few individuals that were spending most of their time visiting porn sites - some of them nurses.

    Checking up on pix of themselves?

  106. Re:As a manager I don't care (TRANSLATION!) by Dread_ed · · Score: 1

    Was just a joke, meant to include a line that it wasn't personal to you...Am a manager myself!

    --
    When the only tool you have is a claw hammer every problem starts to look like the back of someone's skull.
  107. er Sean Connery is Scottish by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

    och aye

    --
    There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
  108. Catching jerks with pr0n, warez, mp3s... by Punk+Walrus · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I used to work for a QA Lab. I have horror stories that I won't bore you with, but because some people weren't watched, we had:

    - Systems repair because some jerk downloaded some pr0n4U.exe file that fucked up his machine
    - Systems repair where people fill their hard drives with pr0n, mp3s, warez
    - LAN slowdown because people are downloading pr0n, mp3s, warez

    The list goes on and on! You know what *I* think of people who do this crap instead of work? Lazy bastards! So do you know what I think of spying on them?

    Pointless.

    I mean, you knew who did work and who didn't. I don't care what employee A's reason of lack of work was, he wasn't working! He could have been reading highly technical manuals, staring off into space, embracing co-ed frottage at the water cooler, whatever. He/she's a slacker! And not in the good "Bob" way, either. I could have told you that without any bandwidth-stealing monitoring software.

    The fact is, if you can't tell how an employee is doing with proof of work... you got bigger problems.
    __________________________________________________
    www.punkwalrus.com - a journal into the forays of living mysteries

  109. Lucky me!!! by nochops · · Score: 1

    WooHoo! Lucky for me I work for a web hosting firm:

    [Boss walks in]"Hey what the hell is that on your monitor?...Porno?"

    [Me]"Um, yes, boss, it's really great pr0n."

    [Boss]"Is the site one of our customers?"

    [Me]"Yep."

    [Boss walks out]"Send me the URL."

    --
    "A terrorist is someone who has a bomb but doesn't have an air force." -William Blum
  110. Busted! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Damn, ya got me.

    I will provide a suitable Bond as a replacement, with my profuse apologies!

    (Alternately, I could provide a high-mileage Tom Jones as a replacement.)

  111. Re:Linux? by bmetzler · · Score: 2, Interesting
    They sent this IT support guy to help me configure my static ip addresses but was completely dumbfounded when he sat at my terminal (which was running blackbox). You shoulda seen his face.... he's like where's "My Computer??"

    So what you are saying is that they aren't actually actively monitoring employees desktops, they just have the ability to take over desktops remotely to support them. You don't ask them for support, so they don't need to connect to your desktop.

    I have a friend that worked in a really large company who went to do some "updates" to computers in the marketing department. He came upon one employees cube and there was Red Hat instead of NT running on the computer. Fortunetaly, I had introduced him to Linux, so he thought that was cool and moved on.

    -Brent
  112. No net monitoring software..but by skinnydskitzo · · Score: 1

    I had the dubious luxury of sharing an office with my boss. I was the jr. admin at a land surveying/architecture firm that employed about 50 autocad technicians. My boss, whose previous employment was a drill seargant in the marines for 8 years, sat about 2 feet from me. He didn't tolerate any extracuricular websurfing and expected some long days out of me. Needless to say I wasn't that depressed when I got the pink slip.....the owner of the firm actually commended me for being able to tolerate the marine. He even admitted it difficult working with this guy.

  113. Morale by marshac · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Where I work as a sys admin, we used to have a box dedicated to monitoring web activity. While I disagreed with the monitoring of employees, I was told to implement it by the director. Morale across the office plummeted the very next day. It was horrible. One of the biggest complaints people had was that the monitoring software has no idea if you are on break or not... and if you are on break, why not visit your online banking? It is after all, YOUR time. To compound this matter, it turned out that the director had a voyeuristic streak to her.... She would spend over an hour a day looking at what sites people would go to....remember, this was not the employee's boss, this was their bosses' boss. She would never say anything to anyone about the stats.... She just liked to watch.

    I thought, and still do think, that this was a complete waste of her time.... After all, isn't observing web based stats of employee web use just as bad?

  114. That's why coffee breaks were invented. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    It's just impossible to focus on work for 8 hours straight, especially one that requires a lot of concentration, like programming. I've found that when I'm coding a difficult problem, I have to step away from the computer for a while and just sit and think about it.

    And back in the days of time-and-motion studies (like the '50s and even before) it was discovered that this applies to ALL office jobs. Executive decision making, typing, filing, adding figures, you name it. If the employee takes several short breaks across the day (like 15 minutes every couple hours, if I recall correctly) the productivity during the rest of the time goes up, and the error rate goes down, to more than compensate - much more. Same applies to people on productions lines, too. (Only there a mistake may mean a man down with an injury rather than just a little rework to do.)

    So the "coffee break" was invented. (Turns out a little caffeine increases the effect, too.)

    And breakrooms were added to every office suite.

    (Similarly, the 40-hour week is a 40-hour week at least partly because productivity drops drastically after 8 hours per day on a 5-day work week.)

    Of course many hi-tek managers were promoted from the ranks (or self-promoted by entrepreneurial activity), with only a few hours of management training (if that). So they didn't get an education that included these facts.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  115. I spend no longer surfing Slashdot at work... by Boss,+Pointy+Haired · · Score: 1

    ... than most of the women I can see from my desk spend applying hand cream.

  116. Some jobs are EXPLICITLY patchy, too. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    why do people waste part of their eight hour day? Because they don't need eight hours every day to do their jobs. Maybe they need twelve one day and four the next.

    Some jobs are EXPLICITLY patchy, too. For instance: Plant maintainence. If the maintainence crew isn't spending half it's time playing Eucre, you don't have enough maintainence men for when things break down.

    This leads to pathologies, when management tries some organizational tweak that doesn't take this into account. For instance:

    There was a steel mill whose bean-counters decreed that every interval on an employee's timecard had to show the project number on which the employee was working (so they could charge each customer the right amount, see?) Sounds reasonable, eh?

    But what about the guys that build and fix up the plant equipment? Well, they made up "project numbers" for each piece of equipment, so they could allocate a cost for its use based on how much labor was spent setting it up and maintaining it. Still sounds reasonable, eh?

    But where do the maintainence men bill their Eucre time, as they wait for something to break down and result in a fire-department style scramble? Oops!

    Well, they had recently fixed this conveyor. So they happened to know its account number. So they used that account number for their downtime.

    And everything worked fine for a few months. Until a bean-counter was looking over the records and discovered that this conveyor seemed to need a LOT of repair.

    So they tore it out.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  117. net surfing by /dev/trash · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I was once busted for visiting CNN.com during lunch, one time.
    I was also busted for visiting the MSDN site as well as other C++ websites. I'm a programmer.

    A co-worker who conducts ALL his personal business from work ( he blames it on all his phone calls from home being long-distance and his mortgage) had pages and pages of non-work sites he had visited in 2 weeks time. Not a word was said to him.

    It's fine to be restrictive, but be consistent.

  118. Rules and regulations by ToastedBagel · · Score: 1

    Rules and regulations should be self-imposed. I realize that some people need to be given rather strict rules, but generally, people who have a dedicated computer at work should not belong to that category. Making too many rules and regulations and telling people what to do would not work in the end. Of course, employees should not be surfing on the internet 8 hours a day (unless that's their assignment), but they should figure out what's appropriate (1 hour a day? Maybe?) by themselves.

    > The expectation is that employees get all their work done.

    After all, that's the company's objective, their goal. I don't think that enforcing such and such rules and regulations is the way to go.

  119. Can't be that hard by Lailyx · · Score: 2, Funny

    If you post a list of people and "inappropriate sites visited" for the month, people will take the hint:

    John Smith: funwithgoats.com 172 visits

    Depending on which department you're in of course. Certain departments may take this the wrong way and use this to find popular links.

  120. Woot! I'm ahead of the curve! by SmurfButcher+Bob · · Score: 1

    Since we run a Win shop with Internet Exploder as the browser, I obviously wasn't too keen on letting the great unwashed touch any external hosts froma production machine... quite frankly, there is no business reason to allow it, it serves no purpose. My solution was simple - it isn't allowed, except for about 4 of us (out of 40 or 50).

    The rest... well, we retire boxes all the time. They all get wiped, and some get Mozilla, others IE, and others Konquerer. They get stuck in disused corners in the building, and connected outside our DMZ. People can use 'em whenever they want... and if the box breaks, well... big deal, it's outside of my production.

    Interesting side note - everyone is told that those boxes are "disavowed" by us - if they get hosed, they stay hosed, and we'll fix them in a few months when we're bored. Six months, and only one hose-up so far... and this in a demographic that often has big hair, chews bubblegum and thinks AIM is "cute!".

    - SBB

    --

    help me i've cloned myself and can't remember which one I am

  121. Master of My Own Domain... by rcr484 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Forget all this bullshit about productivity and smoke breaks and inappropriate web content. I have a subscription filtering system (be jealous, I work for a defense contract with IT money to burn) and we don't worry about what you're trying to browse on the clock. I could care less about you surfing over to cozycoeds.com. What I'm more concerned about are the uninformed user masses who assumed every pop-up they encounter is okay for them to explore. If not for a decent (and none are perfect) filter, Lord knows what trash my systems would be exposed to. But even with filters and firewalls, I still manage to have some dumbasses screw up my network. Excellent case in point, some web-clinker decides it's okay to d/l things on his own, load his own software, despite my best restrictions on Windohs. Turns out he causes this huge bottleneck on my network since his machine is consuming more bandwidth than my Exchange, SQL and file/print servers COMBINED! Users are 90% idiots. Bring on the filters.

  122. maybe change the way people are paid? by zogger · · Score: 1

    --I guess it would depend on the business, but maybe figure out a way to offer a base low salary or hourly, then the 'real' money kicks in dependent on productivity, if there's a way to calibrate it. Then there's the incentive to work harder and more efficiently, and there's no real reason to have serious rules on when you want to take a break and surf or do some online personal business.

    And definetly I'd agree with you on having to be able to google for answers and to keep up to speed, if it's one thing I've learned as a linux noob is google is THE set of useful man pages.

  123. Trading standards department degoogled by CemeteryWall · · Score: 1

    A friend in York, England was asked to pay £95 to the "Crown Data Collection Enforcement Agency". The UK Goverment's Data Protection Registry has a note on their website warning against such "individuals posing as 'collectors on behalf of data protection'".

    My friend looked up their address on Google and found 46 web pages, including an adoption agency a glamour model agency and somebody selling hardcore porn videos. He emailed York's trading standards department.

    He got a phone call back saying York Council policy bans Google so his complaint could not be investigated. How the f*** can they find anything out?

  124. Cellphones and Internet... SSDD. by Mulletproof · · Score: 1

    My first though was, "Oh no! What did these people do BEFORE the internet became popular?!" Kinda like those people who whine about not being allowed to have cell phones in movie theaters... "But what if my kid is sick while I'm watching the movie!?" Gee, what did you do before you got a cell? Sorry, but the reasons for lost productivity presented in this story is nothing but fluff. Maybe there is a legitmate one, but "I can't access Kazaa or my favorite p0rn site from work!" ain't it.

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
  125. YHBT!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    YHL. HAND!!!!

  126. Re:All you European Queers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Post it logged in.

  127. I pay people to work, NOT play by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 1

    I had people screwing around downloading crap, playing games, warez, pr0n, chatting and everything else except working.

    TOO F-ING BAD.... I cut off all access to those types of sevices, filter email and delete non company related email, removed floppies and CD drives and generally forbid anyone from doing anything at work except work.

    If people want to play they can do it at home. I don't hire people to play while I pay them.

    Yes, I am Mr. hardass but I don't care, if they don't like it they can go work somewhere else. I also do not hire smokers or drinkers. Smokers STINK and are sick all the time and waste time smoking, and drinkers are always drunk and are always late for work, forget things, and are untrustworthy in general.

    Work is for work. I can't believe people have the balls to show up and demand to be paid for screwing around!!

  128. Employee E-Blackmail by mbstone · · Score: 1

    One negative effect of employee monitoring is, they don't trust you (or they don't trust you even more than before). Here is an article about some employees who received an email, pay us $50 or we'll tell your boss you were pr0n-surfing.

    Nearly all of the (innocent) employees paid up rather than report the scam! Few, if any, trusted their PHBs to take their word for it that they were being scammed on!!

  129. Biggest Problem: what is "work related"? by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 1

    The biggest problem is what counts as "work related"? Without a human being constantly checking everything you do on the web, you have to rely on a program to be the watchdog. And computer software is absolutely terrible at figuring out semantic context. Is it non - work related to surf eBay so it should be banned for all? The truthful answer is, "depends on context". Is it non - work related to surf a particular newsgroup? The truthful answer is, "depends on context". In fact, that's always the truthful answer. But, corporate big-wigs interested in trying to stop this problem aren't interested in the truthful answer, they want the easy answer. And the easy answer is to just ban sites rather than ban by content.

    --

    Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

  130. Smoke Breaks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do emplyoers who ban personal web browsing ban smoke-breaks too?

  131. In Soviet Russia...... by hughk · · Score: 0
    ...actually, AFAIK, this is current.

    I was shown a work position with four cameras on the employee.

    What were they doing?

    Counting/Sorting Dollars and other currencies. It was a regional office of the Central Bank of Russia. The money arrived in cassettes was loaded into the counting machine and then left in cassettes. Sometimes the machine had to be opened by the operator and that was why the cameras were there.

    I have also visited secret facilities in the west and frequently had to work under the camera. Although none were so bad as the Central Bank office. OTOH, I've not been in a nuclear weapons facility.

    --
    See my journal, I write things there
  132. Here's a suggestion. by rikkards · · Score: 1

    Tell your boss that you may have to leave for the day to deal with personal business but if he ok's it you could use the company's net connection to deal with it and you could do it in a lot less time. Or do it at lunch

  133. This could work for you by ellem · · Score: 1

    MGR: I think Smith is surfing the web for pr0n.
    SA: You sould go tell him to stop it.
    MGR: Can you make a report of his websurfing?
    SA: I could... <lie>But I'll need a new Quad Xeon server to do it</lie>
    MGR: What will the new server run?
    SA: A product called Quake Server
    MGR: OK get oe.

    Three hours later...

    SA: Hey Smith stop surfing for pr0n.
    SMITH: OK I will.

    --
    This .sig is fake but accurate.
  134. I have to work from home a lot... by krinsh · · Score: 1

    I don't think it is always appropriate to send emails about what is happening at my work site to my employers who are not at the work site. It is not negative about particular activity nor is it detailing things I should not share; but I find it hard to remember to tell them things until I get to my home office.

    I also have a *real* home office with high-end printer, fax machine, nice desks and chairs, and a small home network that I have worked in before when telecommuting or consulting so I fall back into that pattern.

    Last but not least, there is a lot of "inappropriate filtering" done at work. I need access to certain technical bulletin boards and just because they run bulletin board software they are filtered to prevent posting by employees. I literally print certain threads into PDFs at home so that I can read them at work. Another example; what good is it to filter security and hacker sites when your unit is responsible for network security and anti-hacking? It is not always prudent to read only the 'approved' sites (which are generally corporate partners or particular vendors and often less technical than you require in order to get your work done!!! you can't just look at the whitehat party line stuff to stay on top of your game) for information that you need.

    --
    I think with the interesting people, their lives can't possibly be wrapped up into a nice little package.
  135. Re:Sounds interesting but I can't read it right no by sootman · · Score: 1

    Offtopic?!? It was a *joke*, get it?!? See, I'm at work, and the article is about employers monitoring web stuff, and I'm trying to download... ah, forget it. Eesh.

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  136. Mail filtering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Baiting the mail filter has become a game where I work. We try to work out what rules its using by trimming down messages until they pass through. This does waste a lot of time.

    The filters are daft though. I get enough porn spam through to show that they're not working that well. I send email about software design, things like

    Consider a wotzit, XXX, then XXX+YYY=ZZZ

    and that gets blocked because it contains the string XXX. Our graphic designer often has images blocked, even sending promotional material to other parts of the company. Its all getting really silly.

  137. same old story... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My boss drops by the the server room every once in
    a while and asks if I can find out what sites are
    visited by various people. Since I don't have
    direct access to the cache logs, I occasionally
    troll through browser cache files and have even
    gone as far as to intall a bridging openbsd box
    with dsniff. I suppose some people have been
    "fired" or "disciplined", but personally, I really
    don't give a flying fsck.

    What does piss me off is when these requests
    become overtly political. And what piss me off
    even more is when the boss wastes my time of
    fscking snipe hunts. The last time that
    happened, I refered him to the folks to take care
    of the web cache. Funny thing, they're
    centralized and pretty divorced of politics.
    They told him to talk to the Legal Dept./HR.
    The disappointment in his eyes was palpable and
    that was really fun to watch. I highly recomend
    this procedure to any and all system admins who
    are in my shoes.

    I also recomend that everyone who wants their
    work place web surfing behavior to go unmonitored
    to have an alternate network path available.
    An external wireless provider on a laptop/PDA is
    perfect. If anyone asks you why you're not using
    your corporate desktop, tell'em you don't trust
    your corporate desktop (that'll throw'em for a
    loop).

  138. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 0

    VI:
    A hungry dog hunts best.
    A hungrier dog hunts even better.
    VII:
    Decreased business base increases overhead.
    So does increased business base.
    VIII:
    The most unsuccessful four years in the education of a cost-estimator
    is fifth grade arithmetic.
    IX:
    Acronyms and abbreviations should be used to the maximum extent
    possible to make trivial ideas profound. Q.E.D.
    X:
    Bulls do not win bull fights; people do.
    People do not win people fights; lawyers do.
    -- Norman Augustine

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...