Slashdot Mirror


Pushing the Envelope For Matrix Reloaded SFX

BenTheDewpendent writes "I just read Steve Silberman's article on the Matrix Reloaded over at wired. I was only slightly anxious to see it previous to reading the article but what they are able to do technicaly now will put bullet time to shame."

302 comments

  1. Wrong... by st0rmcold · · Score: 4, Insightful


    I disagree, it will put nothing to shame.

    Do we shame Star Wars, of course not, we put it on a pedestal as an acheivement for it's time, same applies here, just because it's gonna be better dosen't mean it's gonna put anything to shame.

    p.s. The icon for the matrix is lame.

    --
    Posting useless rant since 2003.
    1. Re:Wrong... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      p.s. The icon for the matrix is lame.

      I concur.

    2. Re:Wrong... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      p.s. The icon for the matrix is lame.

      At first it looks like some sort of bizzare dildo. I mean, it's ok if the tech gets you off (ok, it's not, but I don't wanna go there), but we don't need to know about it.

      I'd suggest having the red and blue pills next to eachother, red-> || <-blue

    3. Re:Wrong... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Drink the blue cough syrup Luke! errr... Neo!

    4. Re:Wrong... by WPIDalamar · · Score: 1

      Well.. it could be *so* good that our permanent perception of what to expect in a movie changes. Then, anyone with this new perception that hadn't seen the other movie, and sees it for the first time would have it "shamed" for them.

      Or it could be **so** good, to retroactively change our perceptions of movies.

      or it could be ***so*** good, to change our perception of life.

      or it could suck.

    5. Re:Wrong... by FortKnox · · Score: 1

      p.s. The icon for the matrix is lame.

      I concur. It looks like color coordinated suppositories to me.
      Perhaps we can offer some suggetions? Perhaps rob in a trench with glasses looking like Neo? Or even the "falling encryption codes" that everyone relates to the matrix?

      --
      Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
    6. Re:Wrong... by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      well, it seems Lucas thinks the original star wars effects are something to be ashamed.

      and et too.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    7. Re:Wrong... by nege · · Score: 2, Funny

      The icon for the matrix is lame.

      Take two and call me in the morning.

    8. Re:Wrong... by capmilk · · Score: 1

      Why do you think "Lucas thinks the original star wars effects are something to be ashamed" of? Did he say so? The fact that he uses more of them and better looking ones, too, might relate to the fact that he now can afford it.

    9. Re:Wrong... by Richy_T · · Score: 3, Funny
      or it could suck.


      Because it can't use a spoon?


      Rich

    10. Re:Wrong... by agallagh42 · · Score: 1

      There is no spoon!

      --
      Carpe Cerevisi - Seize the Beer
    11. Re:Wrong... by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      no, but the fact that the originals won't ever be available on dvd indicates so.
      only the special edition with enhanced effects.
      petition to get the original versions on dvd:

      http://www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/838350 20 0?ts=1049841396&sign[partnerID]=1&sign[memberID]=9 21879785&sign[partner_userID]=921879785

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    12. Re:Wrong... by Cplus · · Score: 1

      Don't petition....just order them online from Hong-Kong, then buy the special edition as well when they come out to take care of any residual IP theft guilt. I've seen the DVD's available now and can honestly say...sweet as hell.

      --
      "Share your knowledge. It's a way to achieve immortality." -- Dalai Lama
    13. Re:Wrong... by Jonner · · Score: 1

      I didn't even notice the icon until someone mentioned it. I had to stare at the page for a minute or two until I saw what you were talking about. I know, I'm not very observant, but you're right that the icon doesn't fit. The green characters would be much better. I even have a the green falling characters for my animated icon in Galeon.

    14. Re:Wrong... by Zerocool3001 · · Score: 1

      This may be touted as something better.At some point we will be unable to produce something better than before. Besides, I don't think the Matrix will be remember for bullet time. Its going to eventually only be remembered for its amazing adaptation of its story line. p.s. Some say icons stink. Corporations make them so what were you expecting?

      --
      Science will save us. The question is, will it destroy us first?
  2. When I heard that Matrix 2 was rated "R" ... by B3ryllium · · Score: 2, Offtopic

    ... I naturally assumed that the movie would be chock full of rockin' sex scenes.

    Ah well. I was thinking "18A", not "14A". I'm depressed now.

    1. Re:When I heard that Matrix 2 was rated "R" ... by Capt.+DrunkenBum · · Score: 1

      It doesn't matter... I am sure it will be available for download on Kazaa (Lite) any time now.

      That is if it isn't already available.

      --

      Not everyone deserves a 320i

    2. Re:When I heard that Matrix 2 was rated "R" ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah. I am sure it will be just as exciting to watch it on your computer as seeing it on the big screen with a top of the line sound system. Movies like this should be made available for free. Watch it for two seconds on your computer and you will run out to the theatre to see it.

    3. Re:When I heard that Matrix 2 was rated "R" ... by modecx · · Score: 1

      Bow Chicka Ckicha Bow Wow.

      "Bullet time", eh?!

      --
      Constitutional rights may be respected, repealed, or modified; but they must never be ignored.
    4. Re:When I heard that Matrix 2 was rated "R" ... by Oliver+Wendell+Jones · · Score: 1

      Bow Chicka Ckicha Bow Wow.

      Isn't that the theme music to Forest Hump?

      --
      A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing -- Emo Phillips
    5. Re:When I heard that Matrix 2 was rated "R" ... by slarshdot · · Score: 1

      there will be sex scenes ;)
      I think its in 2 or maybe it was 3.

      --

      I'm not out of order! You're out of order! The whole freaking system's out of order!
  3. Enter the matrix by bballad · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Is it just me or did the graphics on this game seem dated and bad... Not what I had expected from this group I hope the movie isn't as disappointing.

    1. Re:Enter the matrix by ecchi_0 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think it was probably an alpha version - the models seemed very "placeholderish" to me, and you have to take into consideration that the game is being developed to be fully playable on the lowest common denominator - the PS2. While a PS2- only game can be amazing, when the capabilities of all three consoles need to be combined, there can't be as much eyecandy since all three consoles have different hardware. Also, there didn't seem to be any antialiasing, which I'm sure will make it look better. Who cares about graphics anyway ;)

    2. Re:Enter the matrix by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "Is it just me or did the graphics on this game seem dated and bad... Not what I had expected from this group I hope the movie isn't as disappointing."

      One of the scenes talked about in the article appeared briefly in the Matrix Superbowl Ad. (sorry, that's the only one I've seen...) He made a comment like "Nobody'll find the transition point from real to CG..."

      That scene stood out in my mind because it looked fake. It really did, there was no "How'd they do that?" when that scene aired. But, I'll tell you all something, there's a very real possibility that the reason it looks fake is that we all know on an instinctual level that a human can't do that. Maybe that'll be the charm of it? I dunno.

      I'm worried, though, that Matrix Reloaded will overdo it with effects like that. If your brain gets into "Man, everything's fake" mode, suddenly anything that's percieved as wrong (whether it really is or not) will bother the viewer. If they're bothered, they're not enjoying it. Explaination that this is taking place inside of a giant video game may not be enough.

      I'm a big fan of subtle effects designed to make something that's not quite plausible happen. Remember Terminator 2? Okay, we don't have the technology to make a 'poly mimetic alloy' that can shapeshift, but we have mercury. Most of us have seen mercury. Seeing it taken a step further into shapeshifting is not totaly unbelievable, and the audience responds with amazement. The battledroids in Episode 1. They have semi-human proportions, but are far too thin to be somebody in a robot costume. Seeing them walking around is a little strainge, but not completely out of the realm of possibility. (as a matter of fact, they have a walking robot today, forget who makes it though...) Anybody remember Lord of the Rings 2? What's his name.. uh.. the long haired dweeb with the semi-automatic bow.. Legolas? Anyway, he mounted his horse in a very peculiar way. He did grabbed it's reins with one arm and with a good yank he rolled up onto the horse's back. That was a digital effect, but most people could see that as a stuntman with a hell of a lot of strength in his arm.

      I guess my point is that it's not so impressive to have someting over the top that is too defiant of reality. I hope they'll keep the audience within the realm of possibilty like the first movie did. If they don't, then they can expect a LOT of nitpicking over the effects.

    3. Re:Enter the matrix by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 1

      Doh, sorry. Didn't realize you were talking about the game.

    4. Re:Enter the matrix by JebusIsLord · · Score: 1

      Antialiasing on the PS2?? I'd sure like to see that! Biggest problem with that dang console.

      --
      Jeremy
    5. Re:Enter the matrix by WarDancer · · Score: 1
      While I agree with you for most cases, I remember reading an article about the matrix where the brother specificly stated that the purpose of the first movie was to convince the audience that in that virtual world it was possible to defy the normal laws if you set your mind through it.

      Of course, if you don't really "accept" that fact, I seriously doubt you'll be able to completely enjoy the next 2 movies. Because it's actually like you said, people will loose interest since of course you'll just know it's really fake.

    6. Re:Enter the matrix by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 1

      "Of course, if you don't really "accept" that fact, I seriously doubt you'll be able to completely enjoy the next 2 movies Because it's actually like you said, people will loose interest since of course you'll just know it's really fake."

      It really kind of depends on how you accept it. I'm an artist. There's accepting it on an intellectual level, and there's accepting it on a instinctual level.

      Let me give you an example: I watch Knight Rider. I get a kick out of it. I think we're all familiar with the premise. (Incidentally, that show makes more sense today than it did when it was aired, thanks to the internet...) We've all seen KITT leap over cars and land safely, right? Unfortunately, the physics of that are a little watered down. In reality, some of the jumps that KITT made would have telescoped Michael Knight's spine. However, they have a magic 'passive laser restaint system' that keeps momentum inside of the cabin pretty reasonable. It's sort of like the 'inertial dampners' on Star Trek. So *blam* Michael Knight's safety is explained, right?

      Well sort of. As you said, acceptance is the kicker. First off, I cannot begin to imagine how a 'passive laser' system could prevent somebody's spine from splintering upon impact. Secondly, the way the stunts are performed, you can see the car is a bit overloaded at times and suffers damage. Yet, after a clever edit, the car's just fine! So a lack of plausibility + a flawed execution = somebody who grits his teeth every time he watches a Turbo Boost.

      Would a CG car have fixed that problem? Um maybe. Not necessary, though. (not to mention virtualy impossible at the time.) All they needed to do was retool the shot a bit. Anybody remember the movie Lost in Space? No seatbelts, but when the ship crashed everybody was safe in their seats? Don't remember that? I doubt you do. I don't remember anybody noticing that scene. The reason why is that they visually explained why the crew was safe. There's a brief scene where Will Robinson is instructed to turn on his gravity restraint. As he does, there's a sound of some sort of field powerup, and then he gently gets sucked up against the back of his chair like an artificial gravity field had activated. Very simple effect, no digital effects here, just some ordinary acting.

      Because of this, there was no need to 'explain away' a bunch of stuff. You saw it, and it was fairly convincing. Suddenly, there's little concern that some boat rocking would flop the crew around.

      I'm an artist for a living. I design stuff. I have to fool the eye and then please it. (Now there's an out of context phrase for ya!) One of the harsh lessons I've learned is "If you have to explain why, then you've failed." Okay, that's not an absolute, but it is important to consider when you make something that visually doesn't look right. As mentioned before, it isn't hard to turn people into a bunch of nitpickers for the wrong reasons.

    7. Re:Enter the matrix by modecx · · Score: 1

      Anybody remember Lord of the Rings 2? What's his name.. uh.. the long haired dweeb with the semi-automatic bow.. Legolas? Anyway, he mounted his horse in a very peculiar way. He did grabbed it's reins with one arm and with a good yank he rolled up onto the horse's back. That was a digital effect, but most people could see that as a stuntman with a hell of a lot of strength in his arm.

      I dunno. I found that particular action VERY fake. We all know elves are supposed to be super nimble, and relatively strong, etc. I guess the movement just seemed totally implausible to me. Add to that the fact that they motion-blurred/antialiased the hell out of JUST that particular part of the scene... well it made Jaba The Hut in the origional film look lifelike.

      I really wondered why they had to do that. Just eyecandy for the masses to drewl over, I suppose.

      --
      Constitutional rights may be respected, repealed, or modified; but they must never be ignored.
    8. Re:Enter the matrix by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 1

      "I really wondered why they had to do that. Just eyecandy for the masses to drewl over, I suppose."

      Heh I remember a friend of mine commenting on that scene in LotR 2 and saying "Id do that." I found the thought of this guy attempting a move like that to be quite comical.

    9. Re:Enter the matrix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Antialiasing on the X-Box?, I'd like to see that!

      Show me a game with Antialiasing on the X-Box..
      And for that matter, show me a game on the X-Box without tearing and slowdowns.

      I prefer silky smooth framerates and no tearing over an incremental improvement in quality any day (and yes I own all three consoles).

    10. Re:Enter the matrix by squidfood · · Score: 1
      We all know elves are supposed to be super nimble, and relatively strong, etc. I guess the movement just seemed totally implausible to me.

      C'mon, it's not about strength, it's about practice:

      "What have you been up to for the last 150 years, Legolas?"

      "Learning how to jump on a horse."

      ...and squeezing rocks?

    11. Re:Enter the matrix by modecx · · Score: 1

      ...and squeezing rocks?

      Yeah, that just about sums it up... Haha.

      --
      Constitutional rights may be respected, repealed, or modified; but they must never be ignored.
    12. Re:Enter the matrix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The utter lack of realism (running up walls and trees, anyone?) absolutely killed 'Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon' for a lot of people I know. I liked it, but whatever.

    13. Re:Enter the matrix by fenix+down · · Score: 1

      All right, all right, I'll take a few of those consoles off your hands if it'll help you sleep better.

  4. Other sources by mrpuffypants · · Score: 5, Informative

    A few months back Newsweek did a cover story on the Matrix movies.

    read it here

  5. BEOWULF CLUSTER by kewsh · · Score: 0

    seriously...wonder how big the server farm was to render reloaded? if i remember correctly it was HUGE for the first matrix.

    1. Re:BEOWULF CLUSTER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Can you imagine...

      a Beowulf cluster of SIX BILLION human batteries

      SHOVED UP YOUR ASS?!!!




      (Hell. You probably can. And do. That's probably how you get your jollies. Why the hell else would you ask a Beowulf cluster question on slashdot on Troll Tuesday?!!!)

    2. Re:BEOWULF CLUSTER by carstenw · · Score: 2, Informative

      i have lost track by now, but last time i was vaguely aware, i think they had bought between 2000 and 3000 mental ray licenses from us. they are using mostly dual-cpu boxes, if i recall correctly. i am sure there will be a followup article on the technology at some point, straightening out these points and more. which o/s, which hardware, what rendering software (okay, mental ray), and so on. one thing is sure: they've got a big, hot room full of machinery somewhere.

    3. Re:BEOWULF CLUSTER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get back to work, Carsten. We're not finished, yet ;)

    4. Re:BEOWULF CLUSTER by carstenw · · Score: 1

      hmm, who could this be?

  6. Bullet time rocked by Ballresin · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So I'm totally pumped to see what they do now.

    After watching all the gay movies that copied the Matrix, i'm ready to see em innovate some more.

    Hell, just maybe it will be so cool and complex it won't be on the next GAP commercials before December.

    --
    I got nothin'.
    1. Re:Bullet time rocked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the Gap commercial came first. It was, in part, that technology that gave the guy the idea for how to work BT in the Matrix. How do I know this? Why, I read the article.

    2. Re:Bullet time rocked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gay movies copying the matrix? I didn't know they had gay movies with matrix special effects. cool!

    3. Re:Bullet time rocked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so before you make some statements you should get your facts right I suppose. The Matrix didn't really inovate all that much in the way of ideas of plot or anything. Most of it came from Ghost in the Shell. Which they even credit as being a big inspiration.

    4. Re:Bullet time rocked by mohaine · · Score: 1

      According to the article, it already has been in a GAP commercial.

      --
      (appended to the end of comments you post, 120 chars)
    5. Re:Bullet time rocked by k-0s · · Score: 1

      Look I'll give up "bullet-time" just for an SFX that makes it look like Keanu is actually acting decently. Then I'd support them using it in a GAP commerical.

    6. Re:Bullet time rocked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      did someone say gay movies

    7. Re:Bullet time rocked by t0ny · · Score: 1
      Hell, just maybe it will be so cool and complex it won't be on the next GAP commercials before December.

      Ya, but you can be sure "Max Payne 2" is going to rip off the name of whatever they use this time.

      --

      Manipulate the moderator system! Mod someone as "overrated" today.

    8. Re:Bullet time rocked by AbRASiON · · Score: 1

      You do realise Max Payne was in development WELL before the Matrix movie was... right?

      Case closed (tired of this old piece of rubbish comment) - please move along.......

      next.

    9. Re:Bullet time rocked by t0ny · · Score: 1
      sorry to ruffle your fanboy feathers, but "The Matrix" was released on March 31, 1999. "Max Payne" was released July 16, 2002. So even lowballing the creation of The Matrix and saying it took two years to make, you are saying that Max Payne was not only in development for more than five years, AND had a feature named Bullet Time BEFORE "The Matrix" was released?

      Get real. Move along, fanboy, move along.

      --

      Manipulate the moderator system! Mod someone as "overrated" today.

    10. Re:Bullet time rocked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quite simple really.

      Max Payne is highly influenced by Hong Kong action movies. Matrix is highly influenced by Hong Kong action movies.

      IIRC they (Remedy which did Max Payne) already had the "slow mo action shootout" which is common in HK movies before the Matrix.

      Bullet-time is just a technology to take that effect to new levels. (Rotating and such.) Doing that in a game is trivial. So Remedy didn't actually /need/ anything from Bullet-time as it's only applicable to live action movies.

      Now when the Matrix became a big hit they named the effect Bullet-time in the game as well. That they chose this name because of the movie is obvious since characters in the game talk about the movie (Matrix) and "how cool it would be to move like that". (And they you jump in a shoot them.)

    11. Re:Bullet time rocked by t0ny · · Score: 1
      Now when the Matrix became a big hit they named the effect Bullet-time in the game as well. That they chose this name because of the movie is obvious since characters in the game talk about the movie (Matrix) and "how cool it would be to move like that". (And they you jump in a shoot them.)

      I believe that is the point I was making with my original post. The replier was trying to rewrite history and say that Max Payne was calling it Bullet Time before The Matrix used the term, which hardly seems likely, given the timelines. The fact are "The Matrix" was release three years before "Max Payne".

      --

      Manipulate the moderator system! Mod someone as "overrated" today.

    12. Re:Bullet time rocked by AbRASiON · · Score: 1

      I am saying that Max Payne was WELL in development (it was a long game like DNF - 3.5-5 years, exact figures not certain) before the Matrix movie - if they have bullet time or not in the early versions I can not be certain - none the less you can't make such general comments without more knowledge

      IF max payne was created on April 1, 1999 and released X time later with bullet time, it MOST likely copied it - but if it was created initially before the release of the Matrix, it's quite possible they thought of the feature before the movie release.

      So ... how about you get real and you move along....... "fanboy"

    13. Re:Bullet time rocked by t0ny · · Score: 1
      Considering Matrix BT is a physical creation that was most likely created two years before the movie was released, since it needed to be planned and all that icky stuff, and the fact that Max Payne's BT is a software engine *effect* that could just be slapped in with a few months of work once the underlying work was done, I really dont see how you can claim that the Bullet Time name was from 3d realms. As I said, the time lines just dont work out.

      You just bought into the marketting department's stolen name for this feature, and swallowed the hook, line, and sinker, and are currently flopping around in the bottom of 3d realm's fanboy boat.

      --

      Manipulate the moderator system! Mod someone as "overrated" today.

    14. Re:Bullet time rocked by AbRASiON · · Score: 1

      No, I'm simply disputing the fact it's POSSIBLE both were uniquely thought of.

      It's quite possible they DID copy the Matrix.
      None the less no one can 100% confirm it was copied from the Matrix.

      (also the implimentation with the heart beat etc and just generally how it was done, was very good in Max Payne, no matter what)

      I'm just not making any solid comments without proof, others are.

  7. Forget the Matrix reloaded.... by freeze128 · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's the big intrusive flash animation at wired.com that puts all other pop-up ads to shame.

    1. Re:Forget the Matrix reloaded.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Use Mozilla, Learn the magic of CSS.

    2. Re:Forget the Matrix reloaded.... by satterth · · Score: 1

      Yeah, tell me about it... Freakin insane isn't it.

      --
      Being called a dork on Slashdot must be like being called the retard in special ed.
    3. Re:Forget the Matrix reloaded.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a flash ad at wired? Oh, right, I keep forgetting, my uber-cool userContent.css keeps Mozilla from displaying those :-)

  8. whoopie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Troll

    Great, more trendy not-so-special effects to be used in commercials and parodied countless times for years.

  9. Re:Matrix, Schmatrix. by ibbie · · Score: 3, Funny

    there is no troll.

    ...hey, it worked!

    --
    The wise follow a damned path, for to know is to be forsaken.
  10. Matrix was the next step by eQuasarus · · Score: 4, Interesting

    They did the matrix it with so little cash flow compared to what they have this time around. So whose to say that it can't be great again, take another step and but another standard in cinematography. I loved Matrix, it was one fo the few films that kept me really intranced with the movie through all of it. I really hope that Reloaded will do the same, if not i'll be sad

    1. Re:Matrix was the next step by MSantiago · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Of course, that's what they said about The Phantom Menace. And we all know how that one turned out. Reloaded and Revolutions could very well be fantastic, but more money != greatness.

    2. Re:Matrix was the next step by reflective+recursion · · Score: 1

      Probably more fair to compare Reloaded/Revolutions to Return of Jedi and Empire Strikes Back, than Phantom Menace/Attack of Clones. It was the time between making the next Starwars that really killed the later ones, IMO. One thing you can be sure of though, is if Reloaded turns out good then Revolutions should be just as good since both were shot during the same time period and have the same standards of quality.

      --
      Dijkstra Considered Dead
  11. Re:I shame Star Wars every change I get by warloch71 · · Score: 1

    Who cares. You're in a small minority who mistaken the very good old trilogy with the stinky new one.

  12. Man, I'm still hacked off from last time around. by numbski · · Score: 5, Funny

    You see, for the last 4 years, I've had to eat everything with a knife and fork.

    "There is no spoon" indeed. Bleh. Have you ever tried to eat Grape Nuts with a knife and fork? Or even better, chopsticks???

    --

    Karma: Chameleon (mostly due to the fact that you come and go).

  13. Boobie Time? by darkmayo · · Score: 5, Funny

    If there is a Bullet-time shower scene starring Carrie Anne Moss's boobs then this would be the greatest movie ever. Lets seem ILM do that.

    --
    "I am a kernel in the linux army"
    1. Re:Boobie Time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think I speak for everyone else when I say "what boobs?"

    2. Re:Boobie Time? by Ghostx13 · · Score: 1

      I for one can't wait for Matrix pr0n....

    3. Re:Boobie Time? by darkmayo · · Score: 1

      Oh.. I guess real breasts don't count anymore.

      --
      "I am a kernel in the linux army"
    4. Re:Boobie Time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Please, spare us your feminist rantings about how nobody appreciates real boobs anymore. I've had bumps on my ass bigger than Carrie Anne Moss's tits. It has nothing to do with the fact that her breasts aren't HUGE. They are fuckin' miniscule. Give it a rest.

    5. Re:Boobie Time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I've had bumps on my ass bigger than Carrie Anne Moss's tits

      uh....you may wanna go see someone about that...

    6. Re:Boobie Time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I don't think her boobs are real anyway. Ever see the movie Soft Kill? They sure didn't look real to me.

  14. Now with "Whoavision"... by MeanE · · Score: 4, Funny

    it's like cool and stuff...

  15. different day and age by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    They're going to have to do better than a lame plot and cheese-bag special effects to reach today's sophisticated viewing public, I'll tell you that much for sure!

    1. Re:different day and age by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      insightful? i think this comment was meant to be funny.. sophisticated viewing public indeed

    2. Re:different day and age by mkoby · · Score: 1

      You mean the same sophisticated viewing public that pays to see movies like "The Fast and the Furious" (or the sequal "2 Fast 2 Furious")? Or the same sophisticated view public that pays to see "Bringing Down the House", "Dumb and Dumberer", any movie in the "Scream" franchise, or a non-James Cameron "Terminator 3"? I think you're giving people WAY too much credit. But then again, I fully believe that Hollywood's philosophy is "You will never go broke under-estimating the stupidity of the American public." If the story line is even HALF of what the story was in the first one it'll be better then 1/3 of the dribble Hollywood releases.

    3. Re:different day and age by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, he means the same "sophisticated" public that can't see an obvious joke.

  16. Hrmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Should I eat the Red or the Blue Jellybean?

  17. Gratuitious Effects by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Got a bad feeling about this one. It will suffer from the "MIB II" - "Phantom Menace" - "Attack of the Clones" syndrome, meaning the software rules the film and nobody gives a rat's ass about the story. That's what happens when you try to stretch a 90-page screenplay for more than one film.

    1. Re:Gratuitious Effects by ecchi_0 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Read the article, or any number of other articles about the sequels - the Matrix was MEANT to be a trilogy. They aren't stretching the original story, they're telling more of it.

    2. Re:Gratuitious Effects by garcia · · Score: 1

      well you are only half right.

      while computers may rule the movie, PEOPLE do care about the story. It's the god damn creators that are confused.

    3. Re:Gratuitious Effects by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no story!

      I can't think of a movie that is more style over substance.

      If the new story gets as big a portion as the entirety of a rat's ass it'll have more resources than the first tale.

    4. Re:Gratuitious Effects by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I know what you mean. Take Star Wars for example. That was always intended as a Trilogy, and so Lucas made it into one after his first film was a wide success. And now he's making 3 more, since he'd always intended to. Right?

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    5. Re:Gratuitious Effects by JudgeFurious · · Score: 1

      Point very well made. Of course it was meant to be a trilogy all along. That's the official party line whenever something successful prompts a stampede to cash in.

      Lucas and his 1, no wait 3, no 9, no 6, err..ok 6 movies is the friggin poster child for this kind of thing. And every creaming fanboy believes it too. Every single fucking time it's done.

      At it's best hopefully it (Matrix sequals) might be equal to the original in enough ways to impress. More than likely it's going to be a cinematic abortion of massive proportions. I'm praying they don't screw up too bad with this and that's about the extent of my optimism at this point.

      --
      Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
    6. Re:Gratuitious Effects by Eristone · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I know what you mean. Take Star Wars for example. That was always intended as a Trilogy, and so Lucas made it into one after his first film was a wide success. And now he's making 3 more, since he'd always intended to. Right?


      Actually, if memory serves, originally it was supposed to be 9 movies in total for Star Wars. Episode 4 (which is the original Star Wars we grew up with) - 6 which talk about the rise of the Jedi, Episodes 1-3 which show the rise of the Empire, and then Episodes 7-9 which shows the rebirth of the Republic.

    7. Re:Gratuitious Effects by BRUTICUS · · Score: 1

      "They aren't stretching the original story, they're telling more of it. "

      I believe thats exactly the problem. The best thing about "The Matrix" was introducing the Matrix and explaining what it was. That was the shock factor in the matrix for me. Not the special effects.

      They've already told us what the Matrix is. How are they supposed to top that? They better have some HUGE surprises storywise. If they really believe it will compare to the first.

    8. Re:Gratuitious Effects by Mathness · · Score: 1

      Actually, when "Star Wars" was released, it was intended as a single movie. Due to its huge succes it was renamed "Star Wars IV: A new hope" on rerelease, and the story line was extended to 9 movies (later scaled back to 6 movies, partly because of the stories unfolding in episode 5 and 6).

      --
      Carbon based humanoid in training.
    9. Re:Gratuitious Effects by Zathras11 · · Score: 0

      Correct. The way I've always heard the story
      was that the Bros. approached WB about a trilogy
      and were told that since they had never directed
      ANY movies before, they couldn't do it first.
      So they wrote/directed Bound and only then were
      they given the money for the original Matrix film.
      The success of that film got the other two parts
      of the trilogy funded. Yeah!

    10. Re:Gratuitious Effects by Sri+Lumpa · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Yeah, I hate when a sequel mess up a cinematographic universe (Highlander 2 anyone) but in this case I don't have much apprehension about these sequel (well, a bit of course, but it's more a reflex of hearing the word sequel than real fear). Why is that? On top of my head I can think of these reasons:

      I trust the Washowski brothers to stay fidel to the kind of movie they delivered with The Matrix, just watch the extras on the DVD's and you will understand how passionate about it they are.

      The original Matrix was very strong in the FX department but it didn't prevent it from having a good story, it added to it and I don't see why it should be any different for the sequels with the bro. at the helm.

      And, more importantly

      The Washowski tried to sell it as a trilogy to the studios from the beginning but Warner took a wait and see how well the first movie sell before doing the other ones.

      Of course, given the huge success of the first they got the green light to do the sequels and the necessary funding and they probably have more pressure on their shoulder in many ways (although given that they have shown their directing talent both in Bound and The Matrix the studio probably was less nervous about working with them) and of course there is a possibility that they will bite more than they can chew and it will suck but all in all I am much more confident in that sequel than in about any other sequel to a great movie with the exception maybe of LOTR (whose sequel, TTT, I found inferior to FOTR).

      --
      "The obvious mathematical breakthrough would be development of an easy way to factor large prime numbers." Bill Gates,
    11. Re:Gratuitious Effects by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      Er, buddy, that's what I'm sayin'.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    12. Re:Gratuitious Effects by fenix+down · · Score: 1

      Anybody else think the W bros only got this deal because Warner Brothers executives thought it would be cool to have brothers named W working for WB?

      Just how Vin Deisel got put in the Fast and the Furious because he was named Deisel. That's what I kept thinking when the Asan Akbar guy did his granade shit. If he had joined the navy instead, and stayed less crazy, what are the chances he'd get the fastest promotion to Admiral ever? I'm sure you'd at least have people weighing the annoyance of an unqualified officer vs. chance to have Admiral Akbar do all your press conferences.

  18. Re:Man, I'm still hacked off from last time around by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the grape nuts don't even exist why bother?

    Incase you were wondering, i know kung fu.

  19. I just read on AICN about the hot new effect: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They're using hip, new effect called "Trollin' time!"

  20. More plasticman effects by Proc6 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I watched the Reloaded trailer and from an effects standpoint, it sucks. Its more of that plastic-man, 100% 3D animated crap like SpiderMan and the Star Wars prequel. Like the scene where the agent jumps from car to car, so clearly 3D looking it sucks. I respected the first Matrix because most of the effects were "real world", and the looks showed it. The bullet time wasn't (so to speak) a CG thing, it was a series of cameras, and it looks so cool. But this time they've resorted to the Lucas path of "Let's just DO IT ALL IN 3D!" - Maybe the general public doesn't notice, but I sure notice, it's missing the real world feel, and turns into hokey real fast.

    --

    I'm Rick James with mod points biatch!

    1. Re:More plasticman effects by egomaniac · · Score: 2, Informative

      In bullet time, the actors were the only thing that were real. The entire set was CG.

      Methinks you are talking out of your ass.

      --
      ZFS: because love is never having to say fsck
    2. Re:More plasticman effects by gpinzone · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Considering the "real" agent smith's body woul have to be able to withstand all of the forces involved from car hopping, maybe that's exactly what such a creature would look like?

    3. Re:More plasticman effects by PhoenixFlare · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So, you're basing your opinion of the movie's effects on a 45-second trailer that came out almost a year ago?

      Mmmkay.

      But this time they've resorted to the Lucas path of "Let's just DO IT ALL IN 3D!"

      Did you even RTFA? The stuff they're describing(and have pulled off, it seems)is a physical impossibility to be done with live actors and equipment.

      How would you suggest they do it? Sock puppets? Peeps leftover from last Easter?

      Just wait and actually watch the movie before you lambaste it :)

    4. Re:More plasticman effects by Proc6 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Methinks that's exactly what I'm talking about. The things we focus on the most, the "people" stayed real. The rigs were real. A few backdrops being faked arent as noticeable, but the new trailer shows all these 3d "people", that don't move "quite" right. Mister plastic-man jumping from car to car is a great example, look at it. It's all hokey looking.

      --

      I'm Rick James with mod points biatch!

    5. Re:More plasticman effects by mbbac · · Score: 1

      The Hulk has the same problem. Look at the trailer where he lifts the tank. It looks like something I should see on my GameCube.

      --

      mbbac

    6. Re:More plasticman effects by Big_Breaker · · Score: 1

      I think the point (and some replies below allude to this) is that Matrix 1 looked so good because the people were real even when the environment wasn't. The human eye/brain can spot VERY subtle FX issues with the human form and face. It is much more tolerant of imperfections in the environment.

      Basically we are hard wired to see human flaws. It helps us decide where to comingle our DNA.

      In the scene where Agent Smith jumps from car to car he looks CG. What if they used a real Agent Smith and a CGI environment. Even if they needed to resort to some CG tricks to make it all match up it would look much better (I would think) than doing a fully CGI person. That avoids the physical issues of performing the stunts.

      The worry is that the Wakowskis stare at a computer for so long they start to miss the CGI imperfections.

      One of the very special things about bullet time (a side-effect of the technique) is that you get natural motion blur from the actors movements but no additional blur from the movement of the camera. That gives you a moving picture with a touch of motion blur. I think that contributes to the feeling of realism, control and precision when viewing those scenes.

    7. Re:More plasticman effects by gailwynand · · Score: 1

      Right. Mr. plastic-man looks completely fake compared to the last time I ACTUALLY saw someone jumping from car to car in my local metropolis. Something about the way he takes those landings just isn't "quite" right. And the fakeness of all that CG-fu pales next to the realism of wire-fu.

      --
      A pilot, in those days, was the only unfettered and entirely independent human being that lived in the earth.-Mark Twain
    8. Re:More plasticman effects by bidaum · · Score: 1

      First and foremost, "Peeps leftover from last Easter" get my vote. Second, we are discussing an article about the special effects for an upcoming movie... and the trailer from this movie isn't relevant!? I saw the trailer too and I had the same problem with it; to CG or not to CG depends on whether you can maintaina suspension of disbelief, and that scene did look like a bunch of stretch armstrongs in penguin suits. This isn't to say the final product won't be great, god knows with or without a kendoized sign they have my money. In any event, the trailer sure as hell seems like fair game to me given that it is an example of sfx, but I could just be biased cause I didn't like it either...

    9. Re:More plasticman effects by xmnemonic · · Score: 1

      Bullet time actually had heavy amounts of post-processing done on computers in order to make it look smooth in the first Matrix. In one of the effects documentaries, they show it "raw", and it looks very choppy, far worse than with the CG frames generated to smooth it out.

    10. Re:More plasticman effects by hnoon · · Score: 1

      A little off-topic but here goes:

      "Its more of that plastic-man, 100% 3D animated crap like SpiderMan and the Star Wars prequel."

      Spider man the movie was very true to the comic. The movements of the 3d character were very close to what the comic books portray. The movements, the poses, and the motions of spiderman in the comic are not what you would expect from a real person, they are all highly exaggerated. I think the the movie did a superb job in staying true to the comic.

      On the other hand, I think your assessment of the Star Wars prequel is right on. Then again, like somebody already said, I don't think you should judge the effects of this movie from a 45 second clip, if that. Considering most of the movement is done through motion capture, I don't think it will be too unbelievable, unless of course they copy and paste it to a 100 characters -read storm troopers in AOTC- in the same shot.

    11. Re:More plasticman effects by PhoenixFlare · · Score: 1

      I'm not saying the trailer isn't relevant, but I don't think it's enough to base a fully-formed opinion on, either.

      Who knows, maybe they even went back and reshot/re-computed/re-whatever some of the scenes in the trailer after it released. And even if they didn't, all you saw were flashes of scenes, not the whole thing :)

      And yeah, no matter how it turns out, i'm going to see it at least once, if only to catch the kendo-street-sign action....I have a feeling i'll be sitting there with my jaw on the floor for the duration.

    12. Re:More plasticman effects by msimm · · Score: 1

      I suggest if they can't do it without resorting to the cg they work around it. The first episode improved the state of the art of cinematography and this gave it a particularly rich look. If the second episode is going to focus on cg tricks it will probably be a disappointment to a lot of us. Unnatural movement is an eyesore.

      But you know, Slashdot wouldn't be Slashdot without the wild speculation.

      --
      Quack, quack.
    13. Re:More plasticman effects by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Basically we are hard wired to see human flaws.

      Please read the article. It addresses this exact thing.

    14. Re:More plasticman effects by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe the general public doesn't notice, but I sure notice, it's missing the real world feel, and turns into hockey real fast.

      Awesome! bullet time hockey fights! See the teeth fly out of Mats Sundin's mouth as he chews on a puck!!!

    15. Re:More plasticman effects by agallagh42 · · Score: 1

      "Spider man the movie was very true to the comic. The movements of the 3d character were very close to what the comic books portray. The movements, the poses, and the motions of spiderman in the comic are not what you would expect from a real person, they are all highly exaggerated. I think the the movie did a superb job in staying true to the comic."

      Exactly. They weren't trying to simulate the motions of a man, they were simulating a Spider-Man! Who can say how a Spider-Man should look and move?

      The same can be said about the matrix. Since these aren't supposed to be people fighting, they are computer simulations of people (they're in the matrix after all). What better way to portray computer simulations of people, than by simulating them in a computer!

      --
      Carpe Cerevisi - Seize the Beer
    16. Re:More plasticman effects by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm, the peeps may actually give a better performance than big K :).

    17. Re:More plasticman effects by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's possible that I have spent too much time staring at a monitor, but I thought the effects where extremely good.

      Much better than the battle scene in Blade 2 with the ninja's, it totally spoiled the film.

      I think what could be fooling people is the fact that the _stunts_ are not belivable. I doubt anyone has seen someone who is not bound to earth physics jumping from car to car travelling at speed, so who knows what it would look like.

    18. Re:More plasticman effects by Temsi · · Score: 1

      You probably didn't read the article, did you? (slap on wrist).

      It's not "Let's just do it all in 3D".

      It's Virtual Cinematography, where nothing is emulated, but everything is cloned.
      A scene, shot from many different angles, is combined to make a virtual 3D universe, in which the virtual camera can move anywhere, but all it sees is various calculations of the ORIGINAL FOOTAGE. The 3D elements put into the scene, are digital stuntmen used in at lease a million shots before. The surroundings, while they may even be digitized, also contain only real footage and not "fake 3D renditions", just like the subway in the original Matrix. It was a 3D model done in SoftImage, but all the textures were photos from the actual set.
      Granted, some of the shots in the trailer did look fake. Here's hoping they were early renderings...

      But to me, the most important part is that they can do this now. Matrix can go over the top with it, because by doing so, they pretty much guarantee that later movies which use the same technology but in a subtle way, will look so totally real you'll just wonder how the got the camera to move that smoothly.
      Besides, the MATRIX is not real. It's supposed to be a fake world, in which the agents (and Neo) can move with superhuman speed and strength and are not bound by laws of nature, which is part of what made Spider-Man look so awful, because he blatantly violated the laws of nature, but they don't apply in the matrix when you can manipulated it at will like "super-Neo" can do.

      I didn't particularly like the first movie (because of huge logic holes that bothered me while watching it) although I enjoyed the action scenes, but have since grown to love it, primarily because of it's supreme coolness and spectacular visuals. Sound design rocks too.
      I for one, will be standing in line on May 15th...

      --
      -- This sig for rent.
    19. Re:More plasticman effects by Proc6 · · Score: 1
      Two words.

      Cop.

      Out.

      --

      I'm Rick James with mod points biatch!

    20. Re:More plasticman effects by fenix+down · · Score: 1

      So I guess the assumption we're working with here is that the agents can change their weight? With the fighting stuff, it seems they have to either have insane mass or that they anchor themselves in place somehow. I'd lean toward some kind of anchor, since the fights seem to go along the lines of punch, puch, kick, kick, Neo puts his guard down, next puch sends him flying. There's still lots of needless destruction like cracking concrete after jumping a few dozen feet in the air and landing in a shock-absorbing stance, and jumping off a bridge and crushing an SUV into the ground. I guess it just comes down to anime physics then. Actions only have reactions if it looks cool, and there's no such thing as terminal velocity.

    21. Re:More plasticman effects by schon · · Score: 1

      maybe that's exactly what such a creature would look like?

      That's completely beside the point.

      Arguing what it *would* really look like is sidestepping the issue- which is when you watch it, it just looks "wrong".

      A few years (around 1996 or so) ago a friend and I started a CG company - one of my first projects was to make a milk carton jump and dance around a table.. I spent *days* manually tweaking the motion paths until I got 18 seconds that looked "perfect".

      My friend put it on our demo reel, which he showed his family after Thanksgiving dinner.. the first question asked was "How did you get the milk carton to do that?" Someone else came up with the suggestion that it was a guy in a foam suit, which we superimposed on footage of the desk.

      They were shocked when he told them it was done with a computer.. one comment was "but it looked so real!"

      Back to the issue at hand - if I had spent less time on that one 18 second scene, it wouldn't have "looked so real" - it would have moved "wrong", which would have clued people into the fact that it wasn't real at all.

      Our brains instinctively know when something looks "odd" - even if a computer says it reacts physically correct, we still "know" when something looks wrong.

      When someone sees the footage, they should be asking "how did they get Hugo Weaving to do that?", not saying "Wow, those are nice computer graphics."

      Saying "maybe that's what it should look like" is just making excuses.

    22. Re:More plasticman effects by gpinzone · · Score: 1

      Sometimes, what we "think" looks or sounds "right" may not be acurate.

      Why is it 99.9% of sci-fi movies and shows have sound in outer space? Because it would seem odd for these spaceships to be wooshing (ha!) around wihtout any sound whatsoever.

  21. thanks by PhiberOptix · · Score: 0

    for writing every detail about the presumably best fighting scene in the movie, thus ruining it.

  22. Re:I shame Star Wars every change I get by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who cares. You're in a small minority who mistaken the very good old trilogy with the stinky new one.

    I also despise the garbage known as Star Wars, and I have not seen any of the new ones. Completely over-rated.

  23. put bullet time to shame? by mog · · Score: 5, Funny

    This time, it takes half an hour for neo to finish saying "whoa".

  24. Re:Man, I'm still hacked off from last time around by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why would you eat chopsticks with a knife and fork? Just shove them in your mouth, no utensils required!

  25. Re:I shame Star Wars every change I get by GigsVT · · Score: 1

    Such assumptions. I've never seen any of the new Star Wars "prequels", and yet I also think Star Wars is overrated trash. A soap opera in space, nothing more.

    --
    I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
  26. Open Source Matrix Code Simulator Applet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I wrote an Open Source Applet that simulates the scrolling green code seen in the matrix. You can get it at JavaBoutique. Enjoy- Scott

  27. Re:Man, I'm still hacked off from last time around by mrpuffypants · · Score: 4, Funny

    yes, but you are forgetting the wonders of sporks

  28. Drink to The Matrix by Tolkien · · Score: 0
    I loved the original so much I bought it when it came out, so to its' creators: Cheers!

    *refills wine glass in bullet time* o0o0o0o0o0o

    Reloaded...lookin forward to it, despite what the nay sayers say, hope it's gonna kick ass :D

  29. New Matrix Trailer... by JTFritz · · Score: 4, Informative
    Slightly off-topic, but noteworthy is that the new Matrix Reloaded trailer will air on Sunday during NBC's Arena Football coverage.

    The full story is here: http://www.arenafootball.com/around_the_afl/afl_he adlines/352498.html

    1. Re:New Matrix Trailer... by jestered1 · · Score: 1
      Am I the only one who saw a matrix trailer during a Final Four (U.S. college basketball) game on saturday? All I remember is one of the "twins" characters dissolving into a kind of green mist in front of a speeding car and then the mist solidifying in the passenger seat as the car continued forward.

      I've been looking online for it since. Unsuccessfully. I did have a few to drink by the time I saw it, but I don't think I imagined it.

    2. Re:New Matrix Trailer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I saw it during the Kansas - Marquette game. Just a glimpse on a TV in a bar. I'm guessing a lot of /.s didn't watch the Final Four though.

    3. Re:New Matrix Trailer... by suckass · · Score: 1

      So no one will see it then.......

      --
      blah, blah, blah
    4. Re:New Matrix Trailer... by Eagle2001 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I saw it. There is a great line that distinguishes this trailer from the others. It is "He's pulling that Superman stunt again..." or something along those lines - I forgot the exact wording. I've searched high and low for it on the internet but have not found it.

    5. Re:New Matrix Trailer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      try this:

      http://home.accglobal.net/%7E707727/video/matrix -r eload.mpg

  30. It did? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "the Matrix raised the bar for action films by introducing new levels of realism into stunt work"

    Somebody hasn't seen enough Jackie Chan movies from the seventies and 80s.

    The original Drunken Master. Police Story, SuperCop.

    Actually *doing* the stunts is way more realistic that looking like you're doing it.

    1. Re:It did? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      somebody hasn't seen enough Jackie Chan movies from the seventies and 80s.

      And somebody hasn't read the Wired article. The martial arts choreographer on the Matrix trilogy, Yuen Woo-Ping, is the same guy who worked on the Chan films.

    2. Re:It did? by msimm · · Score: 1

      Your right. But the cinemagraphic story telling and percision camera work in the Matrix raised the bar for technical story telling, despite a few scenes with not-so-hot stunt work.

      --
      Quack, quack.
    3. Re:It did? by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1

      The dojo scene in The Matrix looked fake because it was so stylish that it was impossible to believe that Ted and Larry Fishburne were really doing it.

      But they were really doing it. And there were long cuts in there. They didn't do the zoomed-all-the-way-in-cut-cut-cut bullshit that you see in every other American action movie. Plus, as someone else has already pointed out, it was the same damn choreographer from those Jackie Chan movies you're raving about.

      It *did* raise the bar. Admit it. The bullet-time sequence in the subway looked like it was really happening. They showed you the whole picture.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    4. Re:It did? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I read the article. I know who he is. But computers still don't look as good as people really doing it.

      And by really doing it, I mean wide camera shot with no cuts where the actors just go at it-- like back in the day.

      And btw-- I think he only worked on Drunken Master, then he moved on to make a bunch of wire-fu with Jet Li. Which also looks considerably more fake than the real thing.

      http://www.imdb.com/Name?Yuen,+Woo-ping

    5. Re:It did? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okay, I admit it: I was wrong. Truthfully it was very cool; I'm just too anti-establishment to enjoy anything that other people do.

    6. Re:It did? by Tekgno · · Score: 1

      It looked fake to me, like in the dojo scene, you could tell that it was all wire-work, like when Ted ran up the pole and back-flipped. The body doesn't have the same motion under normal gravity, if Jackie Chan were to do the same stunts, the motion would have been a lot different. The difference is that none of the actors could do stunts anywhere near like what they did without wires, better stuntpeople would have been able to do the basic stunts and then the wires could have been used to provide an exaggeration of that motion. If you dont believe me, watch some more Jackie Chan movies or speak to a _good_ martial artist. Emphasis on the good martial artist there, not some show-pony that looks good, one that can actually do good techniques.

    7. Re:It did? by entrigant · · Score: 1

      Ever seen the stunts in The Matrix? There's a reason they don't actually DO them. If they were possible, someone actually would. They're called stunt men.

    8. Re:It did? by Mac+Degger · · Score: 1

      You forget 'Ghost in the Shell'...

      --
      -- Waht? Tehr's a preveiw buottn?
    9. Re:It did? by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1

      Sure, you could tell that it was all wire work because they weren't just doing exaggerated versions of something that stunt men could have done. It was all completely impossible in real physics.

      I think what the dude (Graeme? What?) is saying is that they show you the actors in such high fidelity that you are more likely to believe the absurd shit that they're doing. For example, they do not blur; they do not make things so fast you can't see them; they do not cut away from action; they show you everyone's faces in close up. That's the part that's more real. The physics are jacked up. Agreed. It is not like Jackie Chan.

      You'll also admit that there's a big difference between Ted's slow-mo flying gunfight in the subway and Jar-Jar's 25 foot flip in the air before he dives into the lake in Ep. 1. One is a revolution in action film making, and the other one has lower production value than a Road Runner cartoon. Right?

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    10. Re:It did? by ralian · · Score: 1

      Actually *doing* the stunts is way more realistic that looking like you're doing it.
      I quote from Roger Ebert:
      begin quote:
      Q. In your review of "Shanghai Knights," you say "The whole point is that [Jackie Chan] does his own stunts, and the audience knows it." I'm curious what you think of Chan's recent admission that this is no longer true--he does use a stuntman for stunts that he does not feel safe doing.

      Geoffrey Romer,

      Claremont, Calif.

      A. We may be up against an urban legend. The authoritative Web site jackiechankids.com says that Chan has never done all of his own stunts, and never claimed that he did, although he sometimes just smiled when others made that statement.

      Why doesn't he do his own stunts? The reply: "He'd be stupid to do all the stunts in all his movies. And as Jackie has said many times, 'I may be crazy but I'm not stupid.' Jackie began his career in the movies as a stuntman and did many dangerous things that no one else would do because he was trying to make a name for himself. After he established himself as a well-regarded stuntman, he no longer had to do it all to prove anything to anyone. So he began to do as much as he wanted to do. In the old days, that meant nearly all the stunts. ... As he got older, he began to use stunt doubles for several reasons. The studios ... sometimes insisted that he use stunt doubles so that their star wouldn't be put in any danger. He also began to be more careful about his own body. Doctors warned him about doing things that might cause permanent damage."
      end quote.

      --

      -raph

  31. Time for a new "Matrix" icon by Call+Me+Black+Cloud · · Score: 5, Funny
    Here are a few starting points for something other than the current use of Alka-Seltzer Cold Plus caplets:

    Not sure what this is about...topless women in leather pants. (SFW)

    What's cooler than a Toyota Matrix, all decked out in racing stickers?

    Oh yeah, baby...Matrix, the board game

    How about the Matrix folding bike? Before or after

    The Vic-20 fans out there might appreciate a look at the Matrix game for that platform.

    Flashback to math class! Matrix multiplication!

    So you see, taco, you're only limited by your imagination. Of course, that could be like saying your writing is limited by your spelling and grammar but still...maybe someone can help you come up with something better.

    1. Re:Time for a new "Matrix" icon by ThinkingGuy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It was a slow network day and I happend to be surfing with the graphics disabled. Loading up Slashdot, I saw the "Matrix" ALT tag and thought, "Neat, Slashdot's finally got a Matrix icon." What a disappointment when I clicked to view it. I mean, OK, the "red pill" is recognizable and familiar to anyone who's seen the movie, and the icon itself is well rendered, but I was really expecting something that better conveyed the dark, cold, futuristic mood of the "Matrix" world.
      If there's ever a Slashdot poll on "Favorite design for new 'Matrix' logo", hopefully there will be an option for "Black screen with descending green characters."

    2. Re:Time for a new "Matrix" icon by sharkey · · Score: 2, Funny
      What's cooler than a Toyota Matrix, all decked out in racing stickers?

      The R-Type American Standard

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    3. Re:Time for a new "Matrix" icon by carstenw · · Score: 1

      "this" (from the first line) is a shop in kiel which advertises that matrix-jackets are back (in stock, presumably) :)

    4. Re:Time for a new "Matrix" icon by Pii · · Score: 1

      That is one buff toilet... Mad props, dog.

      --
      For those that would die defending it, Freedom
      has a sweet taste that the protected will never know.
    5. Re:Time for a new "Matrix" icon by Call+Me+Black+Cloud · · Score: 1

      Sweet ride...thanks for the link. Could have done without the "action" shot though...

    6. Re:Time for a new "Matrix" icon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you cannot multiplicate those two matrices, dork!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    7. Re:Time for a new "Matrix" icon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      >>> you cannot multiplicate those two matrices, dork!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

      Yeah that's what I was just thinking! What kind of math illiterate posting was that, huh?

      More matrix leather.

  32. The Campanile Movie by Johnny5_uk · · Score: 5, Informative
    Information about the precursor to the bullet time technique (The Campanile Movie), that is mentioned in the Wired article, can be found on this page http://www.debevec.org/Campanile


    j

    1. Re:The Campanile Movie by malducin · · Score: 1

      Well that for the image based techniques that were used to render the many virtual set per se. To see the precursors of bulet time check this VFXHQ article:

      Bedtime for Deadtime
    2. Re:The Campanile Movie by henele · · Score: 1
      "Well that for the image based techniques that were used to render the many virtual set per se."

      And its, from what I can guess, popping up in more and more big movies. I think it was used in a number of the swinging shots in Spiderman, and whilst not 100% convincing, as a geek I remember appreciating the stupidly high resolutions of the textures they were throwing around :)

    3. Re:The Campanile Movie by Temsi · · Score: 1

      seems to be /.'ed or something.
      Meanwhile, here's another site that actually has the Campanile movie:
      http://www.debevec.org/Campanile/

      --
      -- This sig for rent.
  33. Having read the article... by Alric · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I am reminded of why I enjoyed the original Matrix so much, why I saw it three times in its opening week.

    I am the only real programmer/computer-nerd/technophile in my circle of friends. The rest live primarily in the realms of literature, audio engineering/theory, and studio art. This fact is only important, because I remember them chiding me about the somewhat cliche plot and often hammy acting in the original Matrix. I couldn't exactly explain to them why I found the movie so thoroughly enjoyable. I didn't claim it to be a masterpiece, but I couldn't make them understand why I could and can still watch the movie so many times and still find it so entertaining.

    If you read the article, you instantly feel the passion for innovation, Gaeta's and the Wachowskis' hunger to create new and beautiful cinematographic standards. And I think I can finally explain that to my snobby friends.

    Sure, the story is a little trite. The acting, while strong in many places, has some definite flaws. But anyone who has a similar desire to understand complex systems and improve upon them, sees these hopes in the original Matrix. They are just a bunch of skilled and creative geeks trying to innovate new and beautiful tools. And as I'm sure many slashdotters understand, that fact makes me feel all warm and cozy inside.

    1. Re:Having read the article... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The acting, while strong in many places, has some definite flaws." Flaws, thy name is Keanu

    2. Re:Having read the article... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blah blah blah blah blah blah

      Yeah. ;)

    3. Re:Having read the article... by stanmann · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hey, he used three DIFFERENT Expressions in the Matrix... and That is two more than he had used before... ever.

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
    4. Re:Having read the article... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I couldn't exactly explain to them why I found the movie so thoroughly enjoyable. I didn't claim it to be a masterpiece, but I couldn't make them understand why I could and can still watch the movie so many times and still find it so entertaining.

      Because you are a big loser with a giant stupid face?

    5. Re:Having read the article... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suppose it all depends on what you're looking for. If it's special effects you want, fine. If you prefer intricate plots with interesting characters and tricky motivations, why not? Others are quite happy to seek out the campiest junk imaginable and are in 7th heaven when they unearth a real stinker. Personally, I now only watch the stuff, good and bad, from my misspent youth. Haven't been to the cinema for 5 years now. So the point is, there's tons of shit out there to choose from now and everybody can please themselves.

  34. 2.5 minutes Matrix Reload Trailer on Sun,4/13/2003 by antdude · · Score: 2, Informative

    Source: Warner Bros. Pictures thinks the Arena Football League and its upcoming film "The Matrix Reloaded" are a perfect match.

    The studio has partnered with NBC Sports to show the trailer for the "Matrix" sequel for the first time on broadcast television during NBC's Arena Football League coverage April 13. The 2-1/2-minute trailer will air at 3 p.m. EDT across all of NBC's regional games. The film opens May 15.

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  35. Effects for Keanu? by darkmayo · · Score: 1


    Even if the special effects for Reloaded are just spectactular they still haven't found a way to make Keanu Reeves an actor. He's a pretty boy who's acting range goes from stoner to surfer...

    Now if they keep him from talking like they did in the first movie they should be ok. /agent smith
    "What good are special F/Xs when your lead can't act?

    eh.. I'll still plunk down my cash

    BAAA BAA

    --
    "I am a kernel in the linux army"
    1. Re:Effects for Keanu? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't tell my girlfriend that. She's totally obsessed with him. I have sat through everyone of his movies with her (including Sweet November). I personally think he has improved a lot since Bill and Ted days but I don't think any Oscars will be coming his way anytime soon.

    2. Re:Effects for Keanu? by darkmayo · · Score: 1

      well when you start at the bottom of the barrel you can only improve :P

      --
      "I am a kernel in the linux army"
    3. Re:Effects for Keanu? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Whoa!"

    4. Re:Effects for Keanu? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually he's not bad.

    5. Re:Effects for Keanu? by Anita+Coney · · Score: 1

      Heck, I would have voted for Henry Rollins to play Neo. Who better to play a post-apocalyptic hacking superhero?! He's tattooed, buff, and a major nerd!

      --
      If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
  36. Re:I shame Star Wars every change I get by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I suppose you had to actually see the movies in the theatre the first time around to genuinely respect it. I am guessing you weren't even born at that point. I would also point out that Star Wars had Harrison Ford, Alec Guiness, and James Earl Jones is it (all top shelf actors).

  37. Re:I shame Star Wars every change I get by st0rmcold · · Score: 4, Insightful


    Hmmm, how can something be overrated? just because you don't like it it's automatically overrated? excuse me, you are the oracle of all movie opinions.

    There are MANY people who think that the Star Wars trilogy is a great set of movies, hence it is not overrated, it's rated properly, overrated would be something that one person thinks being thrown out of proportion. This is the majority opinion, big difference, hence not overrated.

    --
    Posting useless rant since 2003.
  38. Re:Man, I'm still hacked off from last time around by Alric · · Score: 3, Funny

    Wow. I'm thinking the Wachowskis missed a incredibly opportunity here. Imagine seeing "There is no spork." on thousands of nerd-sites and in thousands of signatures. Ahhhh. It would have been priceless.

  39. Re:Man, I'm still hacked off from last time around by daeley · · Score: 1

    "There is no spoon" indeed. Bleh. Have you ever tried to eat Grape Nuts with a knife and fork? Or even better, chopsticks???

    I think trying to eat chopsticks would be hard no matter what you used. ;)

    --
    I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
  40. overhyped by Hubert_Shrump · · Score: 2, Funny

    No story sullied the first one, so who would notice?

    Give the people what they want!

    Talented Keanu Reeves (grimacing): I am stuffed inside a coffee shop philosopher's febrile ramblings.

    Talented Wachowski #1: Excellent! That's a wrap!

    Talented Wachowski #2: What he said.

    Laurence Fishburne (as Samuel L. Jackson): I fell down the stairs today. There was one survivor.

    --
    Keep your packets off my GNU/Girlfriend!
  41. Re:Sorry, have to comment on TFATF comment by schon · · Score: 1, Funny

    That movie was "The Slow and the Dimwitted". What a retarted movie. It was like watching something written by 13 year olds for 13 years olds.

    Hey! You better watch what you say about that movie!!11!1 It was awesome!!!

    Vin Deisal kicks a$$!!11!.. and he's a better actor than.. umm, well.. uhh... he's a better actor than my dog!...oh, umm.. OK, maybe not..

    I'm sorry, what were we talking about?

    Oh, yea, the Fats and the Furryus! It r0x0rs!

  42. My Theory by D3 · · Score: 3, Funny

    They developed a ton of cool stuff that AGAIN is going to be ripped off by every damned sf-movie, commercial, and friggin Shrek II. Therefore they decided to do both films at once and release them this year. Then they don't have to work so hard to create even better effects in another 4 years from now.

    --
    Do really dense people warp space more than others?
    1. Re:My Theory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and friggin Shrek

      If you don't get the difference between a bit of parody in a childrens cartoon and a 'rip off', then you shouldnt be going to the movies in the first place.

  43. Re:Man, I'm still hacked off from last time around by bmalia · · Score: 1

    What if the grape nuts really tasted like chicken?

    --
    There's no place like ~/
  44. Matrix Musings by thatguywhoiam · · Score: 5, Informative
    I don't think the Apollo missions were this complicated. Did any of you guys read the article? I mean, it's absolutely crazy....

    See if I can precis here, for you:

    A splinter faction ("ESC") of renegade uber-compositors and animators, originating at Mass.Illusion (founded by Douglas Trumball), led by some guy with the superhero name of Gaeta, has created the first true photogrammetric virtual cinematography technique, using gobs and gobs of technology and expertise. This technology has been put to good use in the new Matrix movies; the team works at a decommissioned 250,000-square-foot hangar in Alameda. Up to 500 artists have been hired.

    Here's an example of what these people are like:
    How deep did the rabbit hole go? A cast of each actor's head was sent to a company called Arius 3D, makers of ultrahigh-resolution scanners employed in 1999 to archive the works of Michelangelo. The Arius scanner is accurate down to 25 microns - the diameter of a mold spore. To get the clothing simulations just right, ESC sent swatches of Reeves' black cassock and Weaving's jacket to a company called Surface Optics, which builds devices to measure a property of light called the bidirectional reflectance distribution function. Surface Optics happened to have one machine on hand scheduled to ship to Lockheed Martin a month later, where it was to be assigned to its usual task: evaluating the reflectivity of paint on stealth bombers.

    Wow. That is... just... nuts. There's other good examples, like the mock highway they built, or the world's biggest motion-capture dojo.

    It's definitely worth reading if you haven't. Particularly interesting are the bits where Gaeta talks about the in-joke he shares with the Wachowskis regarding the potential subversive uses, particularly for the military.. who have already directed DARPA funds towards such and end. (And before you yell about innefectual gov't spending, I'll remind the reader that DARPA gets shit done.) Even the possibility that this work they've done opens the door that much wider for nightmarish Orwellian realities. Fate, it seems, is not without a sense of irony.

    --
    If Jesus wants me it knows where to find me.
    1. Re:Matrix Musings by kiwimate · · Score: 1

      For the benefit of those of you who haven't read the article, but still want to get in a.s.a.p. -- how about this little gem?

      The ability to create photorealistic virtual human beings raises unsettling questions, especially in conjunction with the means to cut-and-paste them into any landscape. These questions troubled Gaeta himself so much that, a few years ago, he wrote a letter alerting President Clinton to the fact that such technology could be used for purposes of mass deception. (The letter was never answered.)

      As it happens, one group deeply interested in the new breed of hyperrealistic CG is the military. Darpa is fast-tracking image-based rendering and lighting for use in immersive battle simulations. In 1999, the US Army launched the Institute for Creative Technologies at USC, where Paul Debevec - Borshukov's former mentor at Berkeley - is now the head of graphics R&D.

      Gaeta recognizes the paradox. "You have these paranoid films about the Matrix depicting how people are put in a mental prison by misusing this technology, and you have the military constructing something like the actual Matrix. Or maybe our technology will become the actual Matrix, and we have inadvertently spilled the vial of green shit out onto the planet."

    2. Re:Matrix Musings by malducin · · Score: 1

      Well, you skipped a step there, ESC came actually from Manex (after some nasty happenings there) which itself came from Mass. Illussion.

      As far as some of the technology, the VFX industry has been scanning stuff for years. Take for example the actors scans for Star Trek 4 The Voyage Home, for the time travelling sequence. Sure maybe the Arius 3D has more resolution but it's not exactly something new.

      Now the extensive use of photogrammetry was certainly something very new, although apparently was used in some shots in Godzilla the year before. The long in production Dinosaur from Disney also used some photogrammetry techniques for surveying.

      I do like the idea of that mockup highway though, it's rare when you can see nowadays any good car chase scenes.

      Mopst big VFX productions are very big complicated endeavors though you might not hear from them too much.

    3. Re:Matrix Musings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's really creepy. I mean, somewhere out there, there's a parallel Universe where anyone believes a God-damned thing the U.S. government says. Those people could be tricked real easy by CGI. /me shudders. Glad I live in this Universe.

    4. Re:Matrix Musings by ilsie · · Score: 1

      A cast of each actor's head was sent to a company called Arius 3D, makers of ultrahigh-resolution scanners employed in 1999 to archive the works of Michelangelo. The Arius scanner is accurate down to 25 microns - the diameter of a mold spore.

      This strikes me as a little bit weird. This sounds like really super cool tech that is bottlenecked by the cast of the actor's head. Why didnt they just scan the actor's head directly? Wouldnt that have been more accurate?

    5. Re:Matrix Musings by imsabbel · · Score: 1

      Well, such a scan takes its time.
      I guess it would take at least a hour or so.
      the actor wouldnt be able to hold still long enough

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    6. Re:Matrix Musings by Moekandu · · Score: 1
      I don't think the Apollo missions were this complicated. Did any of you guys read the article? I mean, it's absolutely crazy....

      Crazy? Hell, that's nothin'. You should try cutting a movie on film (aka celluloid). That's insane.

      Gimme digital all the way. If I want 35mm quality, I'll rent a HDW-F900 (the same that they used on the actors in M:R, and also the primary cameras in Episode II). I can get one with a DIT (Digital Image Technician, isn't that a lovely acronym?) for $1500 for one day and discounts for multi-day shoots. And I live in Phoenix. That's 30 minutes of raw 35mm film.

      Technology or not, I have to admit I'm starting to get excited.

      Moekandu

      "Even in a Democracy, Armor rocks." - Peabody, an observation of CivIII and Iraq

      --
      Mediocrity knows nothing higher than itself; but talent instantly recognizes genius. -- Sir Arthur Conan Doyle
    7. Re:Matrix Musings by Thing+1 · · Score: 1
      Thanks to your post I went and RTFA.

      I really liked his "top 10 movies" list at the end. It gave me titles to feed into Kazaa. ;-)

      Seriously, man, do you realize how much is on that network? I've already started downloading 5 of his top 10 (the others I've already seen).

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
  45. oh, the irony! by kraksmoka · · Score: 3, Interesting
    that to build the matrix movies, requires the bros. and co. to BUILD THE MATRIX. or at least develop the type of technology that would make a real matrix VR world a possibility.

    so, by making movies about it, we are slowly bringing the possibility of something like the matrix closer to reality!

    would anyone on /. object to "Matrix" prisons for criminals? what about for the severely physically disabled? just for research?

    --
    "You never want a serious crisis to go to waste." - Rahm Emanuel
    1. Re:oh, the irony! by devnull17 · · Score: 1

      How about just for recreation? Star Trek's holodeck has always looked really cool, after all.

    2. Re:oh, the irony! by MImeKillEr · · Score: 1

      ..as long as I can be in the middle of a Jessica Alba/Jennifer Garner sandwich. ..and without the ass-kicking.

      --
      Cruising the internet on my TI-99/4A @ a whopping 300 baud!
    3. Re:oh, the irony! by MagPulse · · Score: 1

      I'm reading Permutation City right now, in which the dead and disabled have their minds transferred to a computer representation, which is very crude compared to the Matrix. Anyone not dead or disabled kills themselves out of depression, often in less than a day.

      The protagonist wants to do research on his copy though, so he takes away the option of suicide. Is it humane research? Even when the copy is of yourself? I'm not that far in the book yet.

    4. Re:oh, the irony! by Temsi · · Score: 1

      When that happens, can you imagine the porn industry? Cybersex will have a new meaning.
      Virtually all the geeks will finally get laid!
      Emphasis on the word virtually, of course...

      --
      -- This sig for rent.
    5. Re:oh, the irony! by tkdack · · Score: 1

      would anyone on /. object to "Matrix" prisons for criminals? what about for the severely physically disabled? just for research?

      Try this: Altered Carbon by Richard K. Morgan.

  46. Best .. Quote ... Ever ... by mattsucks · · Score: 4, Funny

    from the article:

    In the thick of it, Neo is dancing, chucking black-tied bodies skyward, pivoting around the signpost, and using shoulders as stepping-stones over the raging river of whup-ass.

    If "raging river of whup-ass" isn't on a t-shirt at ThinkGeek yet, it damn well should be.

  47. Re:I like linux therefore i want to see keanus tit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He threadjacked this to keanu

    -- the people that read topics community

  48. Don't rob yourself of the experience by Kombat · · Score: 1

    Why would you ruin a work of art like that? Why would you rob yourself of such an experience?

    If the long-lost finale to Beethoven's 9th (make believe) were discovered today, and was going to be premiered by the London Philharmonic, heard for the first time in centuries, would you tune in and listen to it on your AM radio?

    Pay the 6 bucks, grant yourself the once-in-a-lifetime experience of seeing this movie for the first time in the way that can do it the most justice: on a massive screen, with an awesome sound system, and with a bucket of overpriced, greasy (and yet oh-so-delicious) movie popcorn in your lap.

    --
    Like woodworking? Build your own picture frames.
    1. Re:Don't rob yourself of the experience by Galvatron · · Score: 1

      I think he just meant the trailer. I don't think any of us feel a need to sit through Arena Football to see a trailer, just downloading it off of Kazaa will be perfectly sufficient.

      --
      "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
    2. Re:Don't rob yourself of the experience by Capt.+DrunkenBum · · Score: 1

      For the humour impared (See above) I was makeing a joke.

      --

      Not everyone deserves a 320i

    3. Re:Don't rob yourself of the experience by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      6 BUCKS?! Where do you live, anyway? Everywhere I go around here it's $8.50.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    4. Re:Don't rob yourself of the experience by canajin56 · · Score: 1

      But you can get the trailer off of their site

      --
      ASCII stupid question, get a stupid ANSI
    5. Re:Don't rob yourself of the experience by eggstasy · · Score: 1

      erm, the full price for a movie around here is $4.75... but its a lot cheaper on mondays, and ppl older than 65 and younger than 26, if bearing a special card, can see the movie at the discounted rate on tuesdays, wednesdays and thursdays as well.
      And there are 50% off discount coupons regularly published in major newspapers, which i often use.
      Cheaper still are the non-megacorp theaters and hey, they showed "The Core" for free (legally) at my college before it even got to the theaters.

    6. Re:Don't rob yourself of the experience by Sylver+Dragon · · Score: 1

      Pay the 6 bucks

      I think your keyboard is upside-down, every where near me its more like 9 bucks. Though I do get a student discount, so its 7.50. But still, the price of movies these days is getting out of hand, and they absolutly gouge you on the concessions. To make it worse, they have now started running commercials before the movies, not just other movie trailers, those are fine and enjoyed, but standard TV commercials. I thought part of the advantage of paying was that I didn't have to see that crap.
      I do still go to movies from time to time, and will for this one, but unless something looks really good, I'll wait for DVD and/or TV.

      --
      Necessity is the mother of invention.
      Laziness is the father.
    7. Re:Don't rob yourself of the experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      6 bucks is about right at the theaters in nebraska. maybe he lives somewhere similar.

    8. Re:Don't rob yourself of the experience by Galvatron · · Score: 1

      That's just the old trailer. This is the new trailer we're talking about.

      --
      "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
    9. Re:Don't rob yourself of the experience by FluxCapacitator · · Score: 1

      Bloody hell you guys get it cheap. In Tokyo it is about 1800 yen or US$15

    10. Re:Don't rob yourself of the experience by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      For 1800 yes, I'd probably go up to 2500Y or so and just spend the night at Isakaya. 90 minute drink tickets are where it's at!

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    11. Re:Don't rob yourself of the experience by fenix+down · · Score: 1

      You unholy bastard. I'll be at your door noon tomorrow to beat you unconsious with a variety of live shellfish.

      Uh oh, better get going. I have to get to the local theater monopoly, conveniently owned by the same corporation as all the nearest electronics stores and my cable monopoly, oh, and all the local sports teams and their stadiums. I might miss the first 15 minuites of advertizing if I don't hand over the $8 for the ticket soon! I'm sure they need those advertizing dollars, after all, they only get $50 a month out of me for cable, another $50 for crappy broadband, and a few hundred every few months for some overpriced electronics that were only jacked up exactly 10 cents less than the shipping would cost from a competent, reliable retailer!

    12. Re:Don't rob yourself of the experience by Chris+Tucker · · Score: 1

      SO Fulcrum of Evil sez:

      "6 BUCKS?! Where do you live, anyway? Everywhere I go around here it's $8.50"

      Matinee prices here in Boston are $6.00 or so.

      Where do YOU live that a matinee ticket is $8.50?

      --
      Guaranteed! This comment 100% Anthrax free!
    13. Re:Don't rob yourself of the experience by mrleinad · · Score: 1

      Where do you live guys? Everywhere I go, I only pay 2 bucks. Well, I dont know how are things up there at the States. I live in Argentina, but shouldnt it be cheaper there and more expensive here? And Im talking about Argentinean Pesos, in dollars that would be about U$D 1.25. Cheers.

      --
      Mr. Leinad
    14. Re:Don't rob yourself of the experience by eggstasy · · Score: 1

      You're more than welcome to show up at my door, anytime. I live in Lisbon, Portugal, and yes, some things are dirt cheap here, because we're all very poor compared to americans. Sadly, the digicam that I want costs $150 in the states and $400 around here :(
      Same goes for any technological gadget, I'm afraid...

  49. Re:I shame Star Wars every change I get by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Overrated trash"

    Yes! Yes! Yes! For years I have been waiting to see this statement. Thank you! Thank you! Thank you!

  50. The full slogan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Forget the can, visit the source - swim my raging river of whup-ass".

  51. Fight Club. by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 1

    Hey, they did it with Helena Bonham Carter in "Fight Club". Mmm, special effects pr0n.

    I think I have wood now.

    --grendel drago

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
    1. Re:Fight Club. by EpsCylonB · · Score: 2, Interesting

      apparently those weren't her boobies, everything apart from her face was CGI.

    2. Re:Fight Club. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, listed to the commentary tracks on the DVD and she says this.

  52. Answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    That depends on what 'ya want comin out 'o yer rabbit-hole.

  53. Re:Man, I'm still hacked off from last time around by Genom · · Score: 1

    What if the grape nuts really tasted like chicken?

    I would assume they'd be called "Chicken Nuts"...oh wait...they don't taste like grapes now, do they...
    Nevermind ;P

  54. FX Go, Anything Else? by MSTCrow5429 · · Score: 0, Troll

    Now that it has the special FX set, all it needs is competent actors, a believable and original plot, good storywriting, and a decent title.

    --
    Slashdot: Playing Favorites Since 1997
  55. Keanu is as good as any of Hollywoods "Thespians" by stratjakt · · Score: 2

    Seriously. Who is a good actor?

    Mel Gibson? Vin Diesel?

    Arnold Shwartzenegger?

    Clint Eastwood?

    Jack Nicholson?

    Val Kilmer?

    Or the 'mob guys': Pacino, Deniro, Pesci

    Tell me that any of these brilliant actors dont just play every character with the exact same intonations and mannerisms.

    Hollywood acting is just reading lines and looking pretty. Everything else is post production.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  56. Wrong URL for Statesman article by Jammer@CMH · · Score: 2, Informative

    The in the article above was valid when the story was first postedm, but is no longer. The story is now at http://www.statesman.com/metrostate/content/auto/e paper/editions/monday/metro_state_2.html.

    1. Re:Wrong URL for Statesman article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hate to be a nitpicker (untrue), but there's an error in your sig and I figured I'd shame you about it. You misspelled Tolkein.

  57. Keanau by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I still think Keanau sucks...practically anybody in the world would have made a better hero...well except for that mini-me guy.

  58. Holy Shit! by EMDischarge · · Score: 1

    One gigabyte PER SECOND?

    OK, I'll go back to my little bit-shuffling job now...

    --
    Quintus malus puer est.
    1. Re:Holy Shit! by perky · · Score: 1

      Actually it's about 890 Mb/s for 5 cameras at 1080*1920*24bit at 30fps. However to my untrained eye, this sounds like a bit of a waste of time because this level of detail isn't needed. Neither are 5 cameras. It's a bit like them sending the models of the actors' heads to some laser scanning company and boasting that the scan is accurate to 25 microns: completely pointless when the cast itself is significantly less accurate.

      --
      "The new wave is not value-added; it's garbage-subtracted" - Esther Dyson, Dec 1994
    2. Re:Holy Shit! by Pii · · Score: 1
      That's slower than the 10Gbps speeds that are creeping into campuses and co-lo facilities near you.

      It's barely faster than this, and that was a trans-atlantic connection.

      --
      For those that would die defending it, Freedom
      has a sweet taste that the protected will never know.
    3. Re:Holy Shit! by Pii · · Score: 1
      Ack... Forget the trans-atlantic connection... That was only 1 Gbps...

      But the original point stands. 10Gbps is faster than the connection they describe in the story.

      --
      For those that would die defending it, Freedom
      has a sweet taste that the protected will never know.
    4. Re:Holy Shit! by DiscoOnTheSide · · Score: 1

      If memory serves, they film at 60 or 90 to make the slow motion more flowing and natural.

      --
      Viva La Revolucion! Buy a Mac!
    5. Re:Holy Shit! by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      And it will be shown at 24fps in the cinema anyway, unless something has changed!

    6. Re:Holy Shit! by adri · · Score: 1

      Over-sampling happens everywhere when you're actually processing, well, anything digitally.

      An example - you wouldn't work with video at, say, 700x525 if you're going to be doing any scaling or rotation work. You'll end up with scaling/rotation artifacts (where pixels, after a translation, end up taking up partial pixels everywhere.)

      Now I'm sure a similar thing could happen with frame rates. Although, that said, there's lots of whackiness inherent in frame/score timings - take a look at this for an excellent introduction.

      (Disclaimer: I'm not a graphic artist - I'm a coder. I just helped a desperate friend finish a couple of her short-film projects in Final Cut Pro. Its one of the only times I read the manual beforehand.)

    7. Re:Holy Shit! by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      Heh, indeed. But when shooting on film, under or overcranking the camera will change the speed of the shot, since it must be played back at 24fps on the screen in the end.

      I guess if you start getting computers involved it gets hairy, but the output format is fixed.

      As a general rule on the resultion front, twice what you need is usually sufficient.

    8. Re:Holy Shit! by perky · · Score: 1

      I don't think the sony Cameras they were using can do 60 or 90 fps except in interlaced mode. Although having said that, what you say makes perfect sense.

      --
      "The new wave is not value-added; it's garbage-subtracted" - Esther Dyson, Dec 1994
  59. rendered with FreeBSD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's not forget that The Matrix was one of the best showcases for the scalability and stability of FreeBSD as the world's best clustered OS.

    1. Re:rendered with FreeBSD by carstenw · · Score: 1

      do you have more information on that? i am a fan of freebsd... "the matrix reloaded" was unfortunately not rendered on freebsd. it was rendered on windows...

  60. whoa.. by NeoCode · · Score: 3, Insightful

    for a second I thought I reading an AICN thread. C'mon folks. Its just a movie. No one's forcing you to watch it. If you get put off but the CG, leave it be. Stay home. Please don't start "organic web-shooters robbed me of my childhood" syndrome.
    This trilogy is a unique movie concept that set a precedance on how movies are made. What more can the Wacho bros do?

    Watch the movie if you want and then pass judgement. Otherwise, leave it be.

    1. Re:whoa.. by nutbar · · Score: 2, Funny
      Its just a movie. No one's forcing you to watch it.

      Well then why do I feel this huge compelling desire to watch it? You don't know what you're talking about. I'm gonna drag my girlfriend along to this and make her watch it - payback for all those "chick flicks" and "dramas" she makes me watch. Muhaha. Revenge is sweet.

  61. Theatre going worthy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I always saw some movies in certain levels:

    Theatre going worthy
    Blockbuster night worthy
    Download worthy
    Skip

    I see the matrix series as something threatre going worthy. It mentions advanced new affects in visuals and sound. Something that a download won't capture and a dvd rental (b/c I don't have a huge screen and 6.1 surround sound).

    Plus, I know my local theatre's improved their screens and projectors (most with digital show, yea yea I know, it matters on what format the movie was shot in).

    There's a noticeable difference when you watch it in theatres with friends than huddled alone in front of the computer with computer speakers and visual quality that is subpar.

    This is one of the movies that makes theatre going enjoyable.

  62. Re:Keanu is as good as any of Hollywoods "Thespian by DohDamit · · Score: 1

    He's a dog, but Russell Crowe brings something different to every movie. "Gladiator" was a modest low point, and he still out-acted most everyone else that year. He did wonderful work in "A Beautiful Mind" and "The Insider".

    Denzel Washington has brought different aspects to the movies he's been in. Lately, he's been taking too many of the "ubermench" roles, but his earlier work was decent. Just don't see "John Q".

    Another couple of actors that belong on your pretty boy list: Tom Hanks and Robin Williams. They don't act, they emote the same character. (Excepting for Forrest, which was a definite stretch with decent dividends.)

    Keanu Reeves doesn't lambast the audience with fervor(Jack Nicholson, Pacino) or feed off of facial ticks(Mel Gibson, Joe Pesci), but he does give off a good mellow temperment. I wouldn't put him in a romantic comedy, but he's just fine for a new-age action flick.

  63. Keanu acting credibility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've heard too many people complain about this. I'm starting to believe it all spawned from one critic and trickled down to the general public.

    I think he did a fine job portraying a hacker/slacker type person. Most people I know like that, aren't the talkative type, socially.

    Plus, this has to be character's first time discovering and learning each new ability. This has to emit odd emotions especially when you carry and air of 733tness for so long.

    I think they picked the right man for the job. A real hacker would've been horrible. Besides I heard will smith was approached to be the original morpheous, imagine that!

  64. Imitation is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know when a movie/song catches the public when you hear kids imitating it, people talking about it.

    Now a movie/song that catches the industry's attention, you know you're doing something right.

  65. GAP commercial by Transient0 · · Score: 1

    What the article actually said was not that the new 3D world modeling effect they have developed have been used in a GAP ad already.

    What they were pointing out was that the GAP Swing ad which used something very much like Bullet-Time actually PRECEDED the release of the Matrix. Bullet-Time wasn't invented from the ground up by Gaeta and the Matrix team. They took an existing technology and idea and pushed it a little farther than anyone had done before and then used it in a medium(blockbuster movie) where everyone was sure to notice it. Likewise, they are doing the same thing with this new technology. They didn't invent it, but they are taking what already existed to entirely new places.

    1. Re:GAP commercial by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was also in a Van Halen Video! ROCK ON CHERONE!

  66. MMmmmm peeps...drool.drool... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    n/t

  67. Matrix game (minor spoilers) by payndz · · Score: 4, Informative
    I saw a PS2 demo build of this a couple of days ago, about 95% complete and missing some AI tweaks (the enemies sometimes just stood there as you smacked the shit out of them) and *all* of the FMV.

    Good job, too, on the latter count. The PR guy told us that the game has some *major* spoilers for Reloaded, and he was kind of pissed off at having had to see the footage to do his job! Thankfully he didn't spill his guts to us, though from the name of one of the levels I have a feeling one of the big twists involves Morpheus.

    There was also a real "WTF?" moment as well when he was describing some of the enemies you meet (and the only way to kill them) in the Chateau level (the place with the fancy staircase from the trailers). Is this The Matrix or Buffy?

    Actually, the game itself is like a cross between Xbox Buffy and Max Payne, with some Driver/Chase HQ sections in between. (Reflections supposedly worked on the car physics.) Combat in bullet-time (called 'focus' here, though it works just like in Max Payne, somewhat ironic considering where Rockstar ripped the idea off from!) is a good laugh, and your character picks up skills as they go. And yes, you can run up walls. There's also a neat 'hacking' (ie, cheat) mode where you can find codes online and enter them into the game to download new moves into your character. Looks pretty damn good overall, though hopefully the Xbox version will have slightly less jaggy graphics on some of the levels, as that's what I'll be playing it on!

    All the main Matrix characters supposedly show up in the game, crossing over with events in the film, though I only saw Trinity and Agent Smith. The character models looked good for the most part, though some of the non mo-capped character movements were a bit wobbly.

    The bad news - Jada Pinkett Smith's voice acting was really quite lousy! [Shopgirl monotone] "Let's get the hell out of here." Very wooden. I hope she's not like this throughout the film!

    Since the film and game come out on the same day, I'd strongly recommend seeing the film before playing the game if you want to avoid having the ending of Reloaded spoiled...

    --
    You must think in Russian.
  68. Special effects will kill most movies by Geekbot · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's not a matter of how good the effects are. It's a matter of how they are used. Special effects should help you see something that is either impossible or difficult to film and make you believe it. The special effects in the Matrix pulled you in. In their corner was the fact that they were in VR most of the time so a lot of stuff was possible that was unlikely in the real world. However, for an example of effects killing a movie, look at Daredevil. Not that there wasn't enough wrong already, but they made this almost ordinary human jumping around like a a cartoon. I don't care how much the effects made it look just like Ben. He didn't move like a human, the character didn't move like the comic book character, and the results showed a reality that was far too seperated from what the audience could stomach.

    I think the Matrix movie hinted at the obvious pitfalls of special effects when they described the first Matrix, a world so idyllic that it was unbelievable to the point that humans couldn't accept it. Those words may be prophetic because if Matrix 2 comes up with a bunch of effects that constantly remind me that I'm watching CG movie instead of watching something that might really happen, I wont accept it much either.

    1. Re:Special effects will kill most movies by Sylver+Dragon · · Score: 1

      It's not a matter of how good the effects are. It's a matter of how they are used.

      This is all too true. I remeber catching Jurassic park in the theaters, opening day no less. I came out of the theater still wondering when the movie was going to start, it was little more than a, "hey look at what we can do" movie. They just killed any possibility of a plot, and relied on the graphics to bring the money in. And no, I've never read the book, I tried after seeing the movie, but I just couldn't get into it.
      On the other hand, I loved the CG effects in Gladiator, very subtle, and didn't get in the way.
      As for Matrix I, sure the special effects were kinda obvious, since the characters were supposed to be defying the laws of the universe. But overall, I thought they were well done.
      In the trailer, the first time I saw it, I didn't notice the CG effects in the fight scene, but I wasn't looking for them. At this point, knowng that they are CG, I think it would be unfair to critically analyze it now, of course I would find flaws, I would be looking so hard for them I would eventually find them.
      Personally, I'll be plunking down the $15 (2 tickets) to see this movie. My girlfriend would probably shoot me if I didn't, the Matrix was one of her favorite movies.

      --
      Necessity is the mother of invention.
      Laziness is the father.
    2. Re:Special effects will kill most movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gaeta answers:

      "My job has nothing to do with making zingers. The point is not to knock you over with a visual trick. The point is to be able to construct events that are so complex, in terms of what human bodies need to do, that the total 'effect' is impossible choreography. 'My God! It looks real, but it just can't be.'"

  69. trilogy-fever by Transient0 · · Score: 1

    It's true that sequelism is an epidemic in Hollywood and that whenever a new sequel comes out there are always these interviews with the author of the original screenplay where they talk about how they were only able to tell a small part of the story they intended in the original film and they had planned for a trilogy from the start blah blah blah...

    In the case of Star Wars- A New Hope, however, I think the fact that it was subtitled Episode Four lends some believability to the claim that there was more than this one segment to the original story. Regardless, the second Star Wars movie(Empire) was better than the first, hopefully the same will happen in this case.

    1. Re:trilogy-fever by pianophile · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think the fact that it was subtitled Episode Four lends some believability to the claim that there was more than this one segment to the original story.

      Ah, but originally Star Wars was just that, Star Wars. There was no Episode 4 crap until it was re-released.

      See this UseNet post for Details.

      --

      'Your brain is God.' -- Dr. Timothy Leary
    2. Re:trilogy-fever by LetterJ · · Score: 1

      Star Wars wasn't subtitled that in 1977. Only after there was more than one movie was it resubtitled. This essentially happened when they went to video.

    3. Re:trilogy-fever by owenb · · Score: 1

      Except that it wasn't subtitled Episode IV until 4 years later, when it was reissued in 1981.

  70. Re:I shame Star Wars every change I get by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1

    Nice job. You just redefined "overrated".

    If, "To overrate" means "To rate or value too highly." (And it does), then "overrated" means "rated or valued too highly."

    Agreed? He thinks Star Wars is valued too highly by the majority. If it were not valued highly by the majority, then it would not be possible for it to be overrated. His use of the word is completely proper, whether or not you agree.

    BTW, some moderator is hilarious. You've been modded underrated.

    --

    There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
  71. Thanks by ziriyab · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Thanks for the link to the main wired page. I was wondering what this Wired thing was.

  72. Star Wars was the next step by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 2, Funny

    They did Star Wars it with so little cash flow compared to what they have this time around. So whose to say that it can't be great again, take another step and but another standard in cinematography. I loved Star Wars, it was one of the few films that kept me really intranced with the movie through all of it. I really hoped that Phantom and EPII would do the same, if not i'll be sad.

    1. Re:Star Wars was the next step by entrigant · · Score: 1

      And thankfully, starwars episode 1 and 2 were excellent. Too bad the creator is such a tight ass these days tho... practically had to force him to release the damn dvd's.

    2. Re:Star Wars was the next step by quintessent · · Score: 1

      This is how I feel. E I/II were OK, but so disappointing next to what they could have been.

      The most boring part of E I was Lucas's much-hyped pod race. Lucas seemed to think we would all love it, though. Of course, not much else stands out either. Oh, Darth Maul wasn't bad. Too bad he's dead. Of the 5 episodes so far, only E I had fast-action, exciting fight sabre fights. But it had no plot whatsoever. It was just a 2 hour episode of Gilligan's Island, but with lots of whiz-bang effects.

      E II was basically a sci-fi adaptation of South Pacific. And where did they get some of that dialogue?

    3. Re:Star Wars was the next step by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually I thought the basic plot in both Ep1 and Ep2 was really good. Actually better than RotJ.

      In Ep1 we have senator Palpatine, who comes from that annoying planet who manages to conspire to make the Trade allience start an embargo. This so that Amidala will help him get a vote of "no confidence" of the chairman of the senate so that Palpatine can claim this title for himself. After this the robotic troops are sent in on the annying little planet (I still can't recall the name) to ensure that the Trade allience will be attacked and any evidence of his (Palpatines) involvement destroyed.

      In Ep 2 Palpatine has gone on to create the first army of clones, or storm troopers. The Trade allience is again used to create a fictive enemy to the empire. All so that Palpatine can get more power in the senate and get an excuse to release his new fleet on the universe.

      Unfortunately while the ideas are really quite good George Lucas demonstrate why it's not good to have one person as the financer, director, producer and everything else. The amount of bad editing (How could Ep2 /not/ end with the new fleet flying off to the sounds of Imperial march but instead end with the cuddly-wuddly wedding scene?) and agonizingly poor writing (The dialoge for the "sound of music" scenes are some of the worst tripe I have ever had the misfortune to hear) and some effect and just really poor acting.

      So he gets an A for ideas, but F-- for implementation.

  73. The article has a problem. by Hell+O'World · · Score: 1

    You know what the problem is with that artice? Not enought hype.

  74. Better than Bullet Time � by soulsteal · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...what they are able to do technicaly now will put bullet time to shame.

    Am I the only one hoping for "breast-jiggle time?"

    1. Re:Better than Bullet Time � by FeeDBaCK · · Score: 1

      Apparently not, seeing as how there are a couple more posts about it.

      I wouldn't mind it, myself.

      --
      wolf31o2 Developer, Gentoo Linux Games Team
  75. Spiderman by FourDegreez · · Score: 1

    IIRC, the creators of Spiderman speculated that audiences thought certain scenes looked fake, despite the great care the effects guys took to respect the laws of physics, because no one has ever seen a human run, jump, and swing from webbing at superhuman speeds. So our brains register it as fake. What made Matrix 1 great was that the effects, while definitely beyond the abilities of a human, were still limited and subtle enough for us not to reject them outright (plus, I think slow-motion looks more "real" than fast-motion, somehow). Neo flying around like Superman, however, doesn't give me confidence that this will be the case for Matrix 2 & 3.

    1. Re:Spiderman by fenix+down · · Score: 1

      Well, the slow motion adds another level of disconnection with reality. You never really see stuff moving in slow-mo, so it's a lot easier to accept ridiculous movements if they go slow enough that you don't look at the movement as a whole.

      The Spiderman running was odd. The swinging worked well, but the running looked too much like cheap TV car chases where they speed up the 30mph chase to triple-speed. I didn't work out the physics or anything, so it probably actually did make sense the way they did it.

      My problem was that fast runners usually lean way forward and basically pump their legs up and down behind them. Now, that's really to get good acceleration, and I guess if you were a superhero you could maintain a really fast speed with regular distance running form, so I think it was just the unnatural speed that made it look odd. I was expecting somebody going that fast to be halfway falling the whole time. He was just way too perfect to look real.

      Anyway, I agree that flying is just going to look freaky. It's magic, and there's no way to make magic look like it's obeying the laws of physics. You have to stylize it somehow, and that's more work than just getting better motion capture.

  76. Deniro by jay-be-em · · Score: 2

    I seriously hope you were joking when you mentioned Deniro.

    Yes, he has been in quite a few gangster flicks (all of which were critically acclaimed) like Goodfellas, Godfathers, Mean Streets, etc.

    But go check out Taxi Driver, The Deer Hunter, Cape Fear, Raging Bull, etc.

    There is a reason he is considered one of the greatest film actors of all time.

    --
    "Orthodoxy means not thinking--not needing to think. Orthodoxy is unconsciousness." --Eric Blair
  77. SFX = Sound Effects by CheeseburgerBlue · · Score: 3, Informative

    The title should read VFX, not SFX, because we're dealing with VISUAL effects here. Dagnabit.

    1. Re:SFX = Sound Effects by BenTheDewpendent · · Score: 1

      when i submitted it the title was "Pushing the Envelope For Matrix Reloaded" nothing more nothing less. So you can blame taco for that one. but SFX could also be Special Effects.

  78. 95% cheez-wiz by petrockstealer · · Score: 1

    While its true that making an action genre movie requires the use of fast panning and lots of guns and fighting, film makers seem to beleive the bigger your budget, the less you have to worry about the actual story. I just hate to see film after film jumping up and down to earn that largest gross of the year.

  79. Botched anime references by May+Kasahara · · Score: 1
    I have the new issue of Wired sitting on my desk right now (I'm a subscriber), but I haven't read the Matrix article yet (call it "Fear of Spoilers"-- I'm happy that little disclaimer was included with the article). However, I have read the sidebar on Gaeta's film favorites, and noticed that in the listing for the two best known versions of Metropolis (the original Fritz Lang one and the anime by Rintaro), the latter is credited as being by the creator of Akira! Correct me if I'm wrong, but Katsuhiro Otomo directed Akira, and Rintaro wasn't even involved with that production.

    These Matrix guys claim to be such anime geeks, then they mix up the names of two directors that most any hardcore otaku would know! It's a faux pas, sure, but a glaring one.

    On a slightly unrelated note, the mix of films listed was quite enlightening. It's an eclectic (and rather telling) mix... from Kubrick's 2001 to Reggio's Koyannisqatsi and Powaaqatsi.

    1. Re:Botched anime references by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Katsuhiro Otomo, creator of Akira, wrote Rintaro's Metropolis.

      Relax.

    2. Re:Botched anime references by May+Kasahara · · Score: 1
      Ahh... ^_^;

      Still, the wording in the article was a little... vague...

  80. Re:Man, I'm still hacked off from last time around by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No matter what kind of utensil you use, it all tastes like "Tasty Wheat" :)

  81. It'll be released online first by sgtsanity · · Score: 1

    Rumors say that the 2 minute, 40 second trailer will be released Thursday on the official Matrix website. Luckily, rumors about Matrix stuff usually tend to be correct. Warner Brothers really knows how to use the grassroots fanbase.

  82. A note on slashdot moderation by k8to · · Score: 1

    There are three negative moderation items.

    Troll.
    Flamebait.
    Overrated.

    If you think something is say, incorrect, or uninsightful, or just downright pointless (the opposite of many of the plus moderations) then you pick "overrated". Which is true, if it is indeed any of those things.

    --
    -josh
  83. Re:Sorry, have to comment on TFATF comment by Zathras11 · · Score: 0

    I was flipping channels some months ago, and
    saw Vin on MTV being interviewed. I decided
    to watch and came away with a new appreciation
    for the intelligence of bricks. That guy is
    SO f'ing stupid. I can't believe that let him
    go around showing it! You'd think they would
    want to keep that hidden. K.R. is a MUCH better
    actor than V.D. and smarter too, he does very
    few interviews! ;^)

  84. Re:Keanu is as good as any of Hollywoods "Thespian by SubtleNuance · · Score: 1

    Keanu-Voice(TM): Whooaa dude - your, like, a movie expert.. duuuude that ROCKS! Thanks for the, umm, compliment too! (insert-bill/ted-headnod)

  85. Put to shame or make it look an epic.... by keli · · Score: 1

    The discussion reminded me that Monty Python's Holy Grail was originally announced as the picture that made Ben Hur look like an Epic....

    I guess it's all relative :-)

  86. Re:I shame Star Wars every change I get by GigsVT · · Score: 1

    I suppose you had to actually see the movies in the theatre the first time around to genuinely respect it. I am guessing you weren't even born at that point.

    I was born in 1979, I saw one in the theater during it's first run IIRC. I was pretty young at the time, however. If it makes you feel any better, I really like THX-1138.

    --
    I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
  87. Entertainment Tonight on Thursday by XBL · · Score: 1

    They are running it on there as an "exclusive".

  88. Dude... by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 1

    They were as much the model's boobs as Neo's face is Keanu Reeves's. Photogrammetry will make it about as accurate as possible.

    That said, if it wasn't her in the original shot that was scanned in, then never mind. But the point is, it was hot. Yes.

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
  89. Matrix Movie Icon... by flogger · · Score: 0

    OK, Star Wars has an Icon. Matrix, I now see, has an icon. Why not Lord of the Rings? People have been harping about this for a while. I guess I'll add my name to the list of harpers...

    (How low can the Karma go?)

    --
    ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
    "First things first -- but not necessarily in that order"
    -- The Doctor, "Doctor
    1. Re:Matrix Movie Icon... by flogger · · Score: 1

      Yikes, I'm a dork...There is a LotR Icon now. See?
      Sorry for wasting space and mod points.

      --
      ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
      "First things first -- but not necessarily in that order"
      -- The Doctor, "Doctor
    2. Re:Matrix Movie Icon... by NecroArwen · · Score: 1

      Apparently the kharma can go to -1, but i'm sure if you push it you'll find a way to get lower than that. There's a bug that allows -2 and +6. If you find a way to do so, please let me know, because i'm quite inerested in becoming a moderator-for-a-day.

      --
      -e
  90. Iraq Information Minister was right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As it happens, one group deeply interested in the new breed of hyperrealistic CG is the military. Darpa is fast-tracking image-based rendering and lighting for use in immersive battle simulations. In 1999, the US Army launched the Institute for Creative Technologies at USC, where Paul Debevec - Borshukov's former mentor at Berkeley - is now the head of graphics R&D.

    Holy Crap! The Guy isnt crazy at all - we're NOT in Bagdad...it's all movie magic!

  91. Re:Man, I'm still hacked off from last time around by Cplus · · Score: 1

    That's a little bit gauche don't you think? We're not animals after all.

    --
    "Share your knowledge. It's a way to achieve immortality." -- Dalai Lama
  92. Re:Keanu is as good as any of Hollywoods "Thespian by Com2Kid · · Score: 1
    • He's a dog, but Russell Crowe brings something different to every movie. "Gladiator" was a modest low point


    Modest low point? The movie kicked ass.

    • Denzel Washington has brought different aspects to the movies he's been in. Lately, he's been taking too many of the "ubermench" roles, but his earlier work was decent. Just don't see "John Q".


    Another couple of actors that belong on your pretty boy list: Tom Hanks and Robin Williams. They don't act, they emote the same character. (Excepting for Forrest, which was a definite stretch with decent dividends.)


    Robin Williams, pretty boy? Huh?

    Death To Smoochie was hilarious. Bicentenial man was quite good, though a fair departure from the novel. His parts in Aladdin where hilarious, and his Cable TV special was a laugh out loud event the entire way though.

    Mrs. Doubtfire kicked ass. :)

    • Keanu Reeves doesn't lambast the audience with fervor(Jack Nicholson, Pacino)


    Jack Nicholson has personality. He is a jackass, but it works.

    Keanu Reeves doesn't HAVE any personality. Well besides irritating, but that normaly is an EFFECT of a personality, Keanu makes it his personality. . .

  93. Re:Keanu is as good as any of Hollywoods "Thespian by DohDamit · · Score: 1

    When I called it a low point, I meant of Russel Crowe's acting. I absolutely loved that movie, but he didn't have to push himself as hard to act the part.

    Robin Williams is a comedian with a heart. This means he plays two roles: a comedian, or a normal man with a good heart. Death to Smoochy - comedian. Heart - doctor or teacher roles. Both - Mrs. Doubtfire. I would also call Mrs. Doubtfire his best movie.

    Jack Nicholson hasn't acted since "The Shining". Keanu's not bringing a lot to a role, but what he does bring doesn't irritate me.

  94. Re:Keanu is as good as any of Hollywoods "Thespian by Com2Kid · · Score: 1
    • Jack Nicholson hasn't acted since "The Shining".


    Batman.

    As Good As It Gets.

    Mars Attacks.

  95. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 0

    Audience: What will become of Linux when the Hurd is ready?
    Eric Youngdale: Err... is Richard Stallman here?
    -- From the Linux conference in spring '95, Berlin

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...