Slashdot Mirror


Three LindowsOS PCs Reviewed

Eugenia writes "Not one, but three LindowsOS-based PCs (in the value range of $199 USD) were reviewed online by WashingtonPost. A TigerDirect PC, the traditional WalMart/MicrotelPC and one from Nova Computech. The reviewer says that these PCs while are very low-end today, compared to PCs 2 years ago, are actually pretty good solutions for home usage. The reviewer found them lacking in the gaming (no respectable 3D gfx card included), expandibility departments and while he mentions that Linux-based LindowsOS is affordable, is not a panacea as it lacks in good USB support and other demanding areas of our modern times."

352 comments

  1. TEH LINWOS PC.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    I Also baught 1 from my local walmart, but my porn dialiers dotn work wit it so i gave it back for a refund

    1. Re:TEH LINWOS PC.. by bsharitt · · Score: 1

      Buying one at your local Walmart is an achivement in it self. I wish they would sell them in the stores.

    2. Re:TEH LINWOS PC.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  2. No 3D makes Jack a dull boy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    no respectable 3D gfx card included

    Thats O.K With Linux, no respectable 3D drivers would be included either.

  3. Things Lindows lacks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    while he mentions that Linux-based LindowsOS is affordable, is not a panakeia as it lacks in good USB support

    It also apparently lacks Ispell.

    1. Re:Things Lindows lacks by lseltzer · · Score: 2, Funny

      I like my panakeia with syrup

    2. Re:Things Lindows lacks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The machines aren't fast enough to do intensive work like video editing or playing Quake III
      You're damn right playing Quake III is intensive work! Why can't my bosses understand this?!?!

  4. a 3 gig drive ! by Squarewav · · Score: 5, Informative

    what year is this again 1998?? so after the OS that leaves what 1.5 gigs, I guess they would make good dumb X terminals. good luck doing anything else

    1. Re:a 3 gig drive ! by bsharitt · · Score: 1

      I guess since a lot on people have theri computers in the same state as when they got it, they don't need much extra room. But 3gigs is a rediculously small size for most other people.

    2. Re:a 3 gig drive ! by arne · · Score: 3, Informative

      I am still using my 266 Mhz 96Mb, 3Gb HP-armace 1700 notebook for some quite serious work. (Programming, browsing, graphics, writing). It has as always worked fine but is getting a bit bulky.

      The trick is to NOT use KDE/Gnome and kill openoffice, gimp, acroread, realplayer, xine when you do not need it.

      --
      Copyright 1998 arne Verbatim copying and distribution is permited as long as this message is preserved
    3. Re:a 3 gig drive ! by SkArcher · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hmmm

      A drive that size would not matter in a small office environment either, where all data (in theory) would be held on a server, not on the machine itself. These machines run OpenOffice and would do well enough for a SOHO environment, which is where Linux needs to move into the Office market.

      The SOHO market typically has tighter profit/loss margins, so it will make sense to move towards an Open Source solution (as most SOHO's allready employ outside Tech support) as the most cost effective.

      --

      An infinite number of monkeys will eventually come up with the complete works of /.
    4. Re:a 3 gig drive ! by confused+one · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Look at the price again. It's not enough to support a large disk.

      Also, look at the target market. All they're trying to do is provide a system on which they can send e-mail and browse the web. Most of these machines don't even come with decent video cards or a cd-writer; so, clearly they're not intended for gamers or people who save a lot of digital photos.

    5. Re:a 3 gig drive ! by xanadu-xtroot.com · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The trick is to NOT use KDE/Gnome and kill openoffice, gimp, acroread, realplayer, xine when you do not need it.

      For YOU and a lot of us Geeks around here (myself included), those are accepted options. But this is about the average Joe Six-Pack home user. They need to easily type up a letter to mail Aunt Sally on her birthday and not have to learn vi. They want to watch movies sent to them. They want eye-candy. They want to stream audio and video.

      This is stuff I'm sure you're aware of, but that sentence just doesn't apply to someone like my grandma for instance.

      --
      I'm not a prophet or a stone-age man,
      I'm just a mortal with potential of a super man.
    6. Re:a 3 gig drive ! by Junks+Jerzey · · Score: 1

      what year is this again 1998?? so after the OS that leaves what 1.5 gigs, I guess they would make good dumb X terminals. good luck doing anything else

      I still use a P2-333 from 1998 as my main home PC. It has a 6GB drive. How much space am I using? Around 2GB. ~800MB of that is Windows. ~500MB is used for large applications and development environments. The rest is data.

    7. Re:a 3 gig drive ! by nolife · · Score: 5, Informative

      A drive that size would not matter in a small office environment either, where all data (in theory) would be held on a server, not on the machine itself.

      Not just small offices either. Our laptops and desktops have a minimum of 20GB drives and some are as large as 60GB. The average user has less then 2.5GB total including our non space optimized W2K installs. The most I have ever seen was 5GB from a user that stored backup.pst files from our Exchange servers locally.

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
    8. Re:a 3 gig drive ! by tomhudson · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ... so? All they have to do is the same as everyone else does - buy another hard drive when they need more space. The money they save by not paying the M$ tax will buy them another 80 to 120 gigs :-)

    9. Re:a 3 gig drive ! by Eccles · · Score: 3, Informative

      So go with the Tiger Direct machine, it has a 12 gig drive and an AGP slot. Tiger Direct sells a Radeon 7000 for $20 after rebate.

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    10. Re:a 3 gig drive ! by BrokenHalo · · Score: 5, Funny
      I think it's kind of funny that the reviewer describes 1.0 of 1.1 GHz processors as only suitable for word processing and web browsing.

      Seems the Athlon 1.0 GHz Tbird I've been using for the last 3 years for molecular modelling etc is just hopeless, and I should just upgrade immediately or slash my wrists... :-)

    11. Re:a 3 gig drive ! by Zekat · · Score: 1

      I'm still using my AMD 486DX4-100 with a 120 meg drive as an X-term you insensitive clod! :-) (And I still have 20-some meg free, too.)

      --
      Mmm, donuts.
    12. Re:a 3 gig drive ! by BlackHawk-666 · · Score: 1

      They can do all of that on a 3GB drive if they load it up right. What they can't do is then archive 20GB or MP3s ;-) I have some 2GB drives at home which I keep around for the odd task or two. They're great for booting from and getting a small OS running. Anyway, people can always whack in another drive later and just use the small one for booting. Let's face it, for 200USD, you can't really complain.

      --
      All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain.
    13. Re:a 3 gig drive ! by BlackHawk-666 · · Score: 3, Informative
      ...and the Pentium II 350 that has been my mail/web/file server for the last five years should also be thrown out...despite the fact it still does everything it ever needed to do. In fact, with RH 9.0 on it I can still have a very nice web browsing and email experience...the 192MB of RAM helps, and Linux being light on memory also helps.

      By all accounts these machines would be powerhouses compared to the 486DX66 I used to use for SOHO tasks.

      --
      All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain.
    14. Re:a 3 gig drive ! by nolife · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yeah it would be nice with a bigger drive. So would a LCD monitor, a 128MB 3D video card, 3 piece subwoofer, 512DDR memory, a faster processor, firewire, 10K rpm drives. Of course it would no longer be a $199 computer. As with all computer pricing, there is a price to performance factor. The difference between bottom of the barrel PC ($199) and a decent performer $300-400) is not much but still $100-200 more or 2x the price. $199 is still a very decent price for a full computer.

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
    15. Re:a 3 gig drive ! by Uart · · Score: 1

      I had an IT professor at Babson College who insisted that an employee that was only going to use a word processor and email REQUIRED a Pentium 4 with an 80 gig hard drive, etc.

      I argued with him over that. His argument was that the more expensive computer would "last longer" because it would take longer before it became "obsolete."

      I told him that if "it ain't broke, don't fix it. " Or, in other words, it would make just as much sense to buy the cheaper computer and simply not upgrade to the latest versions of Windows and Office whenever they come out. If the employee only does "basic" tasks, as described, any old software will do, and the hardware itself doesn't get slower over time.

      Anyway, he still insists he was right. He also doesn't know the difference between a Pentium and a Celeron processor. I transferred - best thing I ever did.

      --

      Opinionated Law Student Strikes Again!
    16. Re:a 3 gig drive ! by Christopher+Bibbs · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm so embarassed. I still have a P-133 running my home e-mail, web, DNS, and DHCP servers. How does it manage?

    17. Re:a 3 gig drive ! by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      Aren't those the VIA C3 (Winchip) 1GHz. I didn't remember seeing it in the review, but those do struggle with any task more intensive than word processing and MP3 decoding. From what I've seen they are about equal to a Celeron 400-500 MHz at most tasks. You can do more with them, but you will want a very optimized system. Until last summer I was using a PII for my main computer and it performed admirably, of course it had a ton of ram, upgraded video card, no startup crap, and a few other tweaks.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    18. Re:a 3 gig drive ! by luisdom · · Score: 1

      They want eye-candy. They want to stream audio and video.
      Then don't buy a 200$ computer.

    19. Re:a 3 gig drive ! by phorm · · Score: 1

      3Gb is a bit underkill, but I did just build a "demo" laptop with a lit over that that had openoffice, Gimp, CAD software, raytracer, and a bunch of 'nix games, etc etc.
      it was getting pretty full-up by the end, but mainly because I saw fit to partition /usr and /var, / seperately. On a user desktop, I probably could have gotten away with partitioning just / and /var, or just /, and the swap/boot space.

    20. Re:a 3 gig drive ! by angle_slam · · Score: 1

      I didn't even know they still made 3 GB hard drives. I think I had one in the PC I bought in 97. If you look at Newegg the smallest IDE hard drive you can buy from them is 20 GB for $52.

    21. Re:a 3 gig drive ! by jandrese · · Score: 1

      I didn't know that anybody even made 3GB drives anymore. I have to admit, I was expecting a 10GB drive, as those are about as cheap a drive as you can get. Going down to 3GB can't be saving them much, since they're going to have to basically prop up some manufacturers old product line. That is some seriously painful cost cutting IMHO.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    22. Re:a 3 gig drive ! by conteXXt · · Score: 1

      or the pentium III 600 mailserver my ex company is still using for 50 + heavy mailusers is not enough either.

      (I just didn't tell them it was a cast off PC with 2 drives mirrored.)

      --
      The truth about Led Zep should never be told on /. (Karma suicide ensues)
    23. Re:a 3 gig drive ! by halo1982 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I didn't even know they still made 3 GB hard drives.
      They say its a refurb from an IBM ThinkPad. That must be at least three years old if not four. I wonder how long it will last. That said, the Microtel or Tiger systems are a much better deal. I've been looking at getting one of these to replace my parents K6-233 (overclocked even :-/) as everytime I come home my mother bitches about how slow it is. This would be perfect for them.

    24. Re:a 3 gig drive ! by Arctic+Dragon · · Score: 1

      My Pentium II 266 computer gave me many years of great service. Most of its components are now in storage at my brother's house, and I plan on putting it back together this summer. Add a stick of RAM and install Mandrake, and it'll be a good second computer. :)

    25. Re:a 3 gig drive ! by labratuk · · Score: 1

      *ahem*

      P-90.

      --
      Malike Bamiyi wanted my assistance.
    26. Re:a 3 gig drive ! by shaitand · · Score: 1

      It's really not an issue of what hardware will perform at the selected task, it's really an issue of how long the hardware will be available via normal retail outlets (NOT ebay or other used sources) for ready replacement when things go down.

    27. Re:a 3 gig drive ! by savetz · · Score: 2, Interesting

      (Yes I read TFA. I wrote TFA.) No, they're *perfectly* suitable for word processing and Web browsing. With a bit more memory and a bigger hard drive, these machines would all run circles around the PIII-700, my office machine that I used to write the article. I think any of these machines, with some extra RAM and hard drive that I know Slashdot readers have lying around, would be great Linux boxen.

    28. Re:a 3 gig drive ! by linzeal · · Score: 1

      I have a 1 ghz duron UNDERclocked to 750, running about 5 degrees above ambient in my closet just serving as a SAN. Why don't more people underclock? I don't think that machine has been above 2-3% CPU utilization in weeks.

    29. Re:a 3 gig drive ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      3 piece subwoofer


      What the hell is that?
    30. Re:a 3 gig drive ! by nolife · · Score: 1

      I have an old AT&T P100 with 64 ram with 2-1GB SCSI drives running Apache, Squid (configured for proxy use and url filtering acl's), Squirrelmail, SSH (port forwarded from router), Samba, and using some PHP scripts to serve NFS shared MP3's via some PHP scripts. It actually runs pretty decent on a four person lan. The unit started at RH 7.0 but is now 7.3 with nothing connected but one rj45 cable and a power cord with nothing X. It has been averaging 120+ days between reboots with a max over 200. My fileserver is a P200 with 256MB ram also running RH7.3 but its only real purpose is Samba, IMAP, and Fetchmail. Sustained file xfers with Samba to a W2K machine can do about just over 5MB/sec which is not bad for my DMA33 controllers. If you do not need to sit at a machine and use a GUI, you can easily get by with very old hardware.

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
    31. Re:a 3 gig drive ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think these computers come with 3 GB HDDs. I think it's 10 GB. Go to Tiger Direct, and put "Lindows Computer" in the search box. The $199.99 one has a 10 GB HDD, 128 MB of RAM (probably easily upgraded for very little $$).
      My problem is, do you get the Lindows OS CD's? If so, then you can re-setup the drive, with Windows 98 at the bottom, and then the (Debian) Lindows OS on top of that. One could then add a Slave HDD, with Mandrake Linux, if you already have one in your "box-o-hhd's", which I do. I have such a setup that I am using now, and use System Commander to pick which OS to use. (Also have DOS/Arachne and Redhat) The Lindows OS probably has drivers for everything, however, and would get used because of that.

    32. Re:a 3 gig drive ! by Christopher+Bibbs · · Score: 1

      This is turning into a cell phone-esque pissing match of who's got the smallest. I want to hear from the guy running a 386 with 16MB RAM as his IMAP server.

    33. Re:a 3 gig drive ! by nathanh · · Score: 1
      or YOU and a lot of us Geeks around here (myself included), those are accepted options. But this is about the average Joe Six-Pack home user. They need to easily type up a letter to mail Aunt Sally on her birthday and not have to learn vi. They want to watch movies sent to them. They want eye-candy. They want to stream audio and video.

      I dunno. These sound like things that you want to do. I know my grandmother wants to send and receive email and occasionally browse the web for sewing patterns. No joke. She couldn't care less about streaming audio and video or eye-candy or movies.

    34. Re:a 3 gig drive ! by toasterlizard · · Score: 0


      Not that small, but I do have a 486/50 with 16megs serving nfs shares, and a 486/100, 48megs running imap.

    35. Re:a 3 gig drive ! by Daengbo · · Score: 1

      Not to be too technical, but the WinChip was an old Pentium MMX clone, while the C3 is derived from the Cyrix model that VIA bought out.

    36. Re:a 3 gig drive ! by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      Too technical is a good thing, thanks for the info.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
  5. Can't have everything. by woogieoogieboogie · · Score: 5, Insightful

    For the price you get a good deal. $199 for a pc with OS, that is the same price as Windows XP alone. For $199 nobody should expect good 3d cars in the machine because a new 3d card designed to run modern 3d games costs $199. these machines are good for what they are designed for, inexpensive pc's to read email and browse the web.

    --
    ... Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just Powers from the Consent of the Governed...
    1. Re:Can't have everything. by bsharitt · · Score: 1

      Now with Durons instead of thos VIA chips, they are a really good deal.

    2. Re:Can't have everything. by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Yea most Computers at $199 don't come with go 3d Cars. Normally a good 3d car will run you at least $10,000 without a computer. But I kid, especially 9 out of every 10 times I seriously make major typos in my posting. But for $199 People who buy these are not normally doing that are really high profile stuff. They are targeted towards kids as their first computer. College Students who just want it to write papers. Older people who realize that they will need to start using this Internet Thing. Or a good reason for some people to upgrade from their 8088s.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    3. Re:Can't have everything. by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      $199 for a graphics card? A GeForce 4 costs less than half that, and is more than adequate for just about any game currently available.

    4. Re:Can't have everything. by gilesjuk · · Score: 1

      and of course if Lindows isn't their cup of tea they can always replace it.

      Lindows runs as root all the time, so it has very little security advantages IMHO.

      I would also think that peripheral support will be weaker than say Red Hat or Mandrake. Simply due to the type of user using the OS.

    5. Re:Can't have everything. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Lindows runs as root all the time


      Shut up, shut up SHUT UP. Addressed already. You're probably the same type who bemoans Apple for the one-button mouse.

  6. The review is missing one thing by Lumpy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    All through the complaints on what they are lacking one point is missed... THEY COST $199.00! they are basically a bare-bones PC. hell add another $59.00 and you can get a low end Geforce 4 and make it scream for games.

    for $199.00 these things are great.

    and the fact they are windows free are even better.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:The review is missing one thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      A scream for games? What kind of mainboard does it use? I'm sure it's not a top of the line one. I'm sure everything is integrated into the board as well and probably polling the processor for all its worth. Add to that the wonderful 20watt 15 ounce power supply and your just looking for a waste of money sticking a Geforce 4 inside.

    2. Re:The review is missing one thing by Surak · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Even for a geek like me, they might be useful. For instance, I'm thinking about throwing a PC in my kitchen to view receipes online whilest cooking. ;) For $200 (incl. shipping), I can put a similarly equipped system together myself [from new or reman parts], or $240-280 (incl. shipping) I can have it shipped to me already put together.

      So I'm paying an extra $40-$80 to have someone put it together (about the cost of the shipping for the Lindows PC actually). It might take me 30 minutes to an hour to put together the machine, it might actually be WORTH it to buy one of these for that purpose actually.

    3. Re:The review is missing one thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hell add another $59.00 and you can get a low end Geforce 4 and make it scream for games.


      You could, but the systems were fast enough to play The Sims. I think that's fast enough for the target consumer.

      I'm guessing the target consumer are the same people who play "The Sims" all day, check email and surf the web.

      I doubt they're going for the overclockers and hardcore gamers and video editors.

    4. Re:The review is missing one thing by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Umm not.
      A pc with that processor CAN easily do video editing and play quake III plus UT2003 with a nvidia geforce 4 card.

      I do it every day on a P-III 866.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    5. Re:The review is missing one thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, spend another $59.00 and then realize that you are a complete MORON because these don't have an AGP slot. What? Are you going to try to force it in a PCI slot?

    6. Re:The review is missing one thing by BJZQ8 · · Score: 1

      The Microtel machines I have don't have an AGP port...the graphics are all integrated. So bust on upgrading the graphics...the rest of the machine is great though. USB 2.0, Duron 1.1 GHz...for the money they're the best buy in the world.

    7. Re:The review is missing one thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Rather than spend $200+ on a computer why not spend abut $10 for some index cards, a pen, and a box? Or maybe just $5 for a ream of paper to print out the recipe from your regular computer?

    8. Re:The review is missing one thing by MsGeek · · Score: 1

      There are PCI versions of the GeForce 4MX. Actually, they are quite good for machines like this that need a PCI video card to replace Vampire Video.

      --
      Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
    9. Re:The review is missing one thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PLease let me smack you in the head really hard...

      you can buy a PCI geforce 4 card...

      GASP! they still make PCI cards??? That's so 2002!

      Idiot....

    10. Re:The review is missing one thing by soundbyt · · Score: 1
      The article states:


      Tiger Direct charged $40 and Wal-Mart $80 for shipping


      That seemed a bit high to me, espeically since I purchased the same walmart system about 4.5 months ago and I was pretty sure that I hadn't (WOULDN'T) have paid $40 - $80 for shipping. I checked my invoice and sure enough, i only paid $14.35 . I then re-checked the WalMart.com website and shippling was still in the $14 range. To me, that seemed pretty good for computer/keyboard/mouse. There are a lot of sellers on ebay, etc. that charge much more. I'm not sure what this guy was smoking, but I can't imageine that shipping would be $80 ANYWHERE in the country.

      BTW, it's a really good little box. It came with a 20Gig HD instead of the advertised 10Gb. I added 256 megs of Ram (Purchased on sale for 20.00), so I've got a pretty slick little box (that my wife loves) for under $250. Well worth it to me.

    11. Re:The review is missing one thing by Surak · · Score: 1

      I'm a computer geek, remember? $10 for some index cards a pen and a box, while just as effective, wouldn't be NEARLY as COOL! ;)

    12. Re:The review is missing one thing by diersing · · Score: 0

      I admit to not knowing a great deal about Lindows (since I can't seem to download it anywhere) but how are they playing The Sims? Is WINE preconfigured on the build?

    13. Re:The review is missing one thing by xchino · · Score: 1

      " hell add another $59.00 and you can get a low end Geforce 4 and make it scream for games."

      We've used a few Wal-mart PCs as lightwieght servers, and they do great at that, but the expandability really is limited. Any card you got would have to be PCI, as there is only one expansion slot, and it's pci. The integrated video is AGP, but big deal because it sucks. Also, the cases are really small and everything is packed in tight, so even fitting an extra card in can be a task. A linksys 10/100 NIC only has a small area of clearance, so a GeForce may be kinda big. Of course, imaginative case modding can solve this problem.

      Do they make newer 3d cards in PCI anymore? It's been so long since I've checked..

      --
      Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. It's just that yours is stupid.
    14. Re:The review is missing one thing by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1
      In my case I have a client who wants a firewall to regulate her coffee shop's wireless network.

      The ROI on $200 is pretty easy to swallow, and frankly I've run these applications on a 486.

      Granted, I did napalm the Lindows off the drive and reinstalled a more customizable distro, but at least I knew all the parts have Linux drivers.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    15. Re:The review is missing one thing by Surak · · Score: 1

      Gentoo, baby! Yeah! Gentoo makes a great firewall distro, because you only install what you need, it's very tuneable -- AND -- it's easy to keep up-to-date. And most importantly (and more on-topic), you could easily install it on any of those Lindows boxes because it meets all the basic requirements, particularly NIC cards that work with well with Linux out of the box. ;)

    16. Re:The review is missing one thing by shaitand · · Score: 1

      Your ready to pay $40-80/hr to have someone do benchtech work? Last I checked benchtechs are scraping on the verge of minimum wage, maybe $6/hr?

    17. Re:The review is missing one thing by shaitand · · Score: 1

      This is a via cpu, not a PIII, equates to about a PII-300

    18. Re:The review is missing one thing by shaitand · · Score: 1

      PCI video cards haven't been popular since more like 2000. 3.5yrs obsolete IS getting up there in computer time.

    19. Re:The review is missing one thing by Surak · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but *my* time is worth about that. ;)

    20. Re:The review is missing one thing by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1

      (Gratuitous Gentoo High-5, followed by a 360 Waddle.)

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
  7. SCO -5; cowardly by jkrise · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Mr.Robertson said recently in the wake of the SCO vs IBM filing, that he'd paid money to SCO to keep quiet, atleast as regards his flavor of Linux.

    This sounds so cowardly and backwards for true Linux enthusiasts. Those who really buy Lindows to use the bundled Linux can load other and better distros as well.

    It doesn't sound right - being aggressive against Microsoft and a weakling against puny SCO.

    --
    If you keep throwing chairs, one day you'll break windows....
    1. Re:SCO -5; cowardly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it sounds quite right: be tough with the big bullies and protect the little ones.

    2. Re:SCO -5; cowardly by Ubergrendle · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Take a lesson from the Germans in WW2 -- don't fight a 2 front war, especially if they're both bigger than you! Lindows as a company is using its size and maneouverability to dodge any direct confrontations with established market players...Dell, Microsoft, SCO. Lindows is relying upon flying below the radar of Microsoft long enough to solidify themselves as a company, create a stable product, and build a customer base. Microsoft knows of them, but hasn't brought down the full weight of their arsenal upon them yet.

      In SCO's case, market forces will take care of them...IBM and the open source community have a new target of opportunity. Lindows has their own fish to fry, and limited resources with which to wage their war. Who knows, if SCO is beaten back far enough legally, maybe Lindows can sue to get their money back after the fact...

      --
      John Maynard Keynes: "When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do?"
    3. Re:SCO -5; cowardly by bsharitt · · Score: 1

      If they have permission to use SCO IP in the GPL Linuc kernel, shouldn't that allow everyone to use it.

    4. Re:SCO -5; cowardly by pmz · · Score: 1

      This sounds so cowardly and backwards for true Linux enthusiasts.

      If you saw a war approaching between two (relative) superpowers, and involvement would probably mean instant defeat, what would you do? Lindows is simply taking the path of least resistance, in this case, which is simply good business.

      Microsoft is different, however, because MS is right in Lindows' cross-hairs. If they weren't agressive with MS, then Lindows would have lasted months not years.

    5. Re:SCO -5; cowardly by sco08y · · Score: 1

      This sounds so cowardly and backwards for true Linux enthusiasts.

      Why would you think IBM gives a rat's ass about "true Linux enthusiasts"?

      They settled because lawsuits are expensive, and generate bad publicity.

      They're rational people: they just want an operating system that works. It's not a religion for them.

    6. Re:SCO -5; cowardly by Scott+Carnahan · · Score: 1

      Mr.Robertson said recently in the wake of the SCO vs IBM filing, that he'd paid money to SCO to keep quiet, atleast as regards his flavor of Linux.

      You seem to be summarizing the news reported here, here, and here, but your interpretation of the deal as some kind of hush money payoff seems kind of skewed. The deal Robertson mentioned took place two years ago, long before the recent brouhaha. In fact, this was back when SCO was Caldera, they were reasonably Linux-friendly, and McBride was not yet in charge.

      This sounds so cowardly and backwards for true Linux enthusiasts. Those who really buy Lindows to use the bundled Linux can load other and better distros as well.

      Even if you hadn't twisted the facts, this would be a rather strange thing to say. The "true Linux enthusiasts" aren't anywhere near the target market for Lindows. It's geared toward first-time buyers and people whose previous computer experience has been primarily with Microsoft Windows.

      --
      "Your notation sucks!" -- Serge Lang (1927-2005)
  8. Linux replacement by Dreadlord · · Score: 3, Funny

    I don't know but I didn't find Lindows a good replacement for Linux for those who want to try the *nix world, especially that it costs money and doesn't come with all the software a good distro comes with, anyway, I guess it maybe good for those who think that windows is the only OS.

    --
    The IT section color scheme sucks.
    1. Re:Linux replacement by The+Lord+of+Java+II · · Score: 1

      I agree. You might want to try Walmart's Mandrake PCs or just install your favorite distro of course.

  9. Rather Biased by nurb432 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I got the impression they were biased from the beginning.

    'they cant perform' due to the fact they are not cutting edge technology.

    So what? most people don't have brand new stuff and get their jobs done just fine.

    In business 99% of the computers are idle, waiting for the user to do something. Even in home life ( games aside ), the computer is NOT being taxed.. its mostly just a expensive heat generating device.

    The idea you HAVE to keep this current cycle of upgrades going is really irritating. Efficient programming and some commonsense goes a long way.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:Rather Biased by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'll echo your sentiments. Perhaps barely a month ago, reviews of a 1.2Ghz budget machine (1.2Ghz, 256mb ram, cdrom, floppy and 20gb HD) in the local paper mentioned that these computers were good for "Word processing and maybe some light internet browsing but not much else".

      Bullshit. That's pure and simple buying into a "let's sound smart because I know there are faster machines available" mentality. a 1.2Ghz machine will run MS Office very well, it'll handle an mp3 collection, digital photos and pretty much ANYTHING internet related. It'll run photoshop or gimp just dandy and do near anything most people need for audio. It'll store documents, run a few versions of windows or linux, or act as any kind of home server.

      No, it's not brand new and latest/greatest, but it is a friggen 1.2Ghz machine. about the only things it would be painful for is doing continual strong number crunching tasks.

      efficiency rocks.

    2. Re:Rather Biased by yppiz · · Score: 1
      Mod parent up.

      I have a 700MHz PIII with 384M RAM and it runs everything an ordinary user would want. It's even decent for simple photo and video editing and mp3 ripping.

      --Pat / zippy@cs.brandeis.edu

    3. Re:Rather Biased by The+Lord+of+Java+II · · Score: 1

      Yeah! I have a 900 Mhz Duron with everything onboard (except I installed a GeForce 2 because Sis 630 didn't run 3D on Linux and also I have lots of RAM - 512 Mb and 40 Gig ). I triple Mandrake + XP + 98 and I do just about everything (web server, games, development, CD burning, DVD without using my hardware decoder, and even some video editing) just fine. And except for video editing the speed so good that god know when I'll get the next PC!

    4. Re:Rather Biased by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've got a 350mhz P2 with 256mb of RAM. It does everything I want (play some (older) games, Internet, photo editing, audio) well with the exception of video playing, which I can just barely get 30fps on a 352x240 Divx video. It's good enough.

    5. Re:Rather Biased by luisdom · · Score: 1

      Agreed, and

      about the only things it would be painful for is doing continual strong number crunching tasks.

      And you would be surprised with which computers a lot of number crunching tasks is done, at least in university... Really, for me, between 6 hours and 3 hours means that the thing will be scheduled for the night, which maybe I would do anyway for the 3 hour one...

    6. Re:Rather Biased by Vaughn+Anderson · · Score: 1

      hehe, I ran a 333 mhz machine for a long time. I consistently keep my CPU at least 1 year behind everyone else's so my CPU upgrades cost me $30 instead of $1,000. hehe, right now I am running 733 or so, it runs all the nVidia demos just fine...

      I try to tell people to get a cheaper slower machine, but noooo, they want the big and fast, and guess what, 3 months later, their big and fast is now slow and old... *sigh*

    7. Re:Rather Biased by Azureflare · · Score: 1
      I think what people are realizing on this post is that... *Gasp*!! Reviewers are trying to make you upgrade!!! Oh the horror!!

      Somebody has to make money, and the computer industry isn't going to make money if people feel satisfied with 3 year old technology. So, whip out the marketing experts!! Whip out the reviewers, smash those old budget comps and tout the brand new shiny 3ghz machines!

      Personally it makes me sick, in more than one way; in some ways, it shows how weak the computer industry is for consumers. The fact is, most people just want internet, email, and word processing, and not much else, maybe the occasional game of hearts or solitaire. But they certainly don't need ridiculus speedy machines, and unfortunately, computers don't quite have that macho factor that cars and trucks do.

      Anyway, these next few years should be quite interesting, since people will begin to realize they don't need to keep on shelling out money every year or two.

    8. Re:Rather Biased by master_p · · Score: 1

      Of course its biased. I run an Athlon 650 MHz with 640 MB of RAM, a DMA66 30 gig hard disk with a GF3 Ti200. And it plays just fine! everything rocks, I do many compiles on this machine, and even run almost all latest games at 1280x1024x32 without problems.

      I even managed to run Doom III on it!!! (although what I got was max 5 FPS...)

    9. Re:Rather Biased by danila · · Score: 1

      You forget that it will even allow professional audio- and video- editing (with appropriate peripherals and HDDs, of course), as well as 3D animation (come to think of it, it's only 3 times slower than 3.6GHz).

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
  10. What the crap?! (OT) by SirTwitchALot · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is the second story I've seen where the text on the main page didn't match the text of the real story. On the main page I see:
    mentions that Linux-based LindowsOS is affordable, is not a panakeia

    and in the story:
    mentions that Linux-based LindowsOS is affordable, is not a panacea

    Obviously a correction of a typo, but why doesn't it show up on the main page?! (I'm not caching the page either, this happens on PC's that I've never used to visit slashdot.) Sorry for the OT post, but I'm losing my Mind!

    --
    Go away, or I will replace you with a very small shell script.
  11. Adequate by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 1, Funny

    Despite their scaled-back features, these computers run on AMD Duron 1.0- or 1.1GHz processors, making them speedy enough for word processing, Internet access, working with digital pictures and playing some games.

    Making them similar to a P233?

    --
    -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    1. Re:Adequate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your math skills are REALLY lacking...

    2. Re:Adequate by The+Lord+of+Java+II · · Score: 1

      Dude after I got a Duron I wondered why on earth was I paying for Pentium before. People just piss me off when they criticize something without trying them out!

    3. Re:Adequate by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 1

      Dude, word processing, Internet access, working with digital pictures and playing some games. P233s are fast enough for these things.

      Dude, wasn't long ago, I was playing Quake III while reading that the GHz barrier had been broken.

      Dude, do you understand sarcasm?

      Dude, I'm typing this on my D600 @ 987 right now! Maybe I'll do some word processing after I play some games!

      Dude, don't call me dude!

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    4. Re:Adequate by The+Lord+of+Java+II · · Score: 1

      Chill, dude! It was just a comment! I have P266 at home too and it doesn't compare to the Duron at all. I mean sure it's perfect for the internet but it sucks with Office XP. With Linux a P266 was good enough it only was loading too slow. I sell computers and after trying out every single CPU Durons are my favorites at the time!

    5. Re:Adequate by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 1

      Ahem.

      DUDE DON'T CALL ME DUDE!

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
  12. Self-contradicting? by TrollBridge · · Score: 5, Insightful
    "...these PCs... are actually pretty good solutions for home usage."

    And then...

    "The reviewer found them lacking in the gaming, expandibility departments... lacks in good USB support and other demanding areas of our modern times."

    Now maybe I'm just being picky here, but at least based on the headline, it would seem that this reviewer is contradicting himself.

    --
    There's a Mercedes gap too. I want one and can't afford one, but it's not government's job to do anything about it.
    1. Re:Self-contradicting? by AnswerIs42 · · Score: 1

      And that's a surprise? ;) Not like this review was done by someone at TechTV or at least some kind of tech site.

    2. Re:Self-contradicting? by savetz · · Score: 1

      Although I wrote the article, I didn't write the headline (my editor did. ) I was a bit dissapointed when I saw it in print. The machines are actually pretty good solutions for home usage. The current version of Lindows, however, isn't, lacking good USB support, etc.

  13. Well duh! by jbfaninmo · · Score: 1

    $200 will buy you a piece of crap computer, I'm glad that Slashdot linked me to an article telling me that. The only thing related to Lindows in that article is that it told us Lindows has poor USB support.

  14. The divide at last by Groote+Ka · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Does this mean that we will finally have the divide between high-performance office machines (I'm talking PC here, not SGI and HP9000) and machines for the demanding home user (video editting, gaming and the like) on one hand and the simple processing machine for the man in the street doing a few simple games and some administration and perhaps a little internet browsing?

    Or... You plugh in the Lindows tinies as work stations in your kitchen (to access your recipe database) and bedroom, next to your server. When the Wall Mart stuff support Wi-Fi, that is...

  15. Okay ... you missed the point ... by SuperDuG · · Score: 5, Insightful
    "The reviewer found them lacking in the gaming (no respectable 3D gfx card included), expandibility departments and while he mentions that Linux-based LindowsOS is affordable, is not a panakeia as it lacks in good USB support and other demanding areas of our modern times."

    What part of These computers sell for $200 did you miss? This isn't the late 90's era of "best bang for under a grand", this is a review of "best bang for an average lower-class can be paid for in a pay check" system. These computers aren't designed to be top of the line, these are a super happy medium between price and performance. If you want a gaming machine for less than $200, got get an PS2, XBox, or GameCube, these computers are meant to do what computers cheaply do. Surf the net, write papers/emails, dink around, etc.

    What USB support is lacking? These computers are meant to be useable for Joe Average computer user. You can still visit slashdot with the damned things, no one thought to mention that as a high point. Lindows with a low price system makes a perfect computer for folks wanting to get on the internet and type up some christmas cards. This isn't meant to play Doom III, please remember that, there is a market that wal-mart sells to, and that market is designed for this computer.

    --
    Ignore the "p2p is theft" trolls, they're just uninformed
    1. Re:Okay ... you missed the point ... by Zathrus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What USB support is lacking? These computers are meant to be useable for Joe Average computer user.

      Well, from the article:

      "But Lindows has drawbacks, notably poor support for USB peripherals such as digital cameras and scanners."

      Which cameras and scanners? Dunno. Didn't say. But I think we all know that Linux still isn't up to the level of Windows when it comes to this -- some manufacturers simply aren't releasing drivers or developer info on interfacing with their devices, and that leaves Linux in limbo.

      But this is exactly the kind of thing that Joe Average computer user wants to be able to do, and do without ANY issues. More importantly, the user is right -- there is no reason they should have issues with this kind of thing.

      I dunno why I'm astounded that people didn't read the article, but come on... it's shorter than some of these posts (like this one). And the last sentence reads "But if your computing tasks are limited to light work and you can get by without tech support, one of these PCs can do the job nicely in a home or small office." -- hardly a damning of the computers in question, not even a backhanded compliment. The submitter made a bigger deal of the shortcomings than the Washington Post did.

    2. Re:Okay ... you missed the point ... by SuperDuG · · Score: 1
      Which cameras and scanners? Dunno. Didn't say.

      Okay lemme first touch on this part of your comment ... Why would someone who has a $200 computer be buying a $100 digital camera? ...

      Basically it comes down to this, if people want more portability they will change the default setup (upgrade, diff OS, etc.) but they won't already just have a digital camera laying around they'll want to plug into it. If they hit the market for a digital camera they will more than likely ask a simple question (will this work with my Lindows computer) Which will cause a huge mass of confusion because teen star camera seller will think they just slurred the word windows.

      If it does work, they will be happy and keep the camera, if it doesn't they'll take it back. People are pretty resourceful, even those less apt at using a computer with finding a way to get something done.

      Now ... THIS
      dunno why I'm astounded that people didn't read the article, but come on... it's shorter than some of these posts (like this one).

      I dunno why I'm astounded that peoeple don't read the comments they're commenting on. IF you would have read what I italicized then you would have noticed that I was commenting on the submitters comments, not the freeking article. The title of "Okay... you missed the point ..." was meant for the submitter not the article itself.

      And in conclusion ...

      Joe average computer user will also realize that there is no computer component that just works out of the box. Batteries dead, computer not configured, software out of date, manual to hard to read, etc. etc. etc. Everything you buy requires tweaking, even a vaccuum cleaner you buy from wal-mart, you have to build the damned thing and attach all the parts to it.

      --
      Ignore the "p2p is theft" trolls, they're just uninformed
    3. Re:Okay ... you missed the point ... by jrumney · · Score: 1
      "But Lindows has drawbacks, notably poor support for USB peripherals such as digital cameras and scanners."

      I've never used Lindows, so maybe its not up to the standard of other distros, but two years ago, I installed Mandrake on my PC, and out of the box it supported every peripheral device I have, including my cheap USB scanner and digital camera, and my 4 year old printer which is completely unsupported under Windows XP.

      I don't remember the last time I was able to plug any new hardware into a Windows machine and use it without needing to install proprietary drivers, which usually come with crappy software you don't want and take over your file associations so you spend hours getting your system back to normal.

    4. Re:Okay ... you missed the point ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      perhaps a few Lindows users writing to their digital camera etc. manufacturers complaining that their camera doesn't work under Lindows would persuade them to support it - if they're going to support Lindows, then that involves writing Linux drivers... Profit! Well, OK, the possibility of more Linux drivers.

    5. Re:Okay ... you missed the point ... by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

      Why would someone who has a $200 computer be buying a $100 digital camera? ...

      At Walmart, you can buy a 2.1 megapixel digital camera for $25. It takes SmartMedia cards for storage, a rapidly obseleting format that is still widely available. You can grab 32meg SM cards for $10 each.

      To get those pictures onto a Lindows PC, the safest bet would be a $14 USB-SmartMedia adapter, also sold at Walmart.

    6. Re:Okay ... you missed the point ... by shaitand · · Score: 1

      Since when should a home user be installing hardware in his pc? I'll answer for you, NEVER this is what professionals are for. If you don't want to hire a professional then you should be required to learn enough about the machine that you know the implications of what your doing. If you know little enough that you typically need to call a tech support line if something goes wrong installing a usb device then ou have no business installing a usb device!

  16. I still dont see why Lindows logo is... by felesii · · Score: 1

    "The Running Man"

    1. Re:I still dont see why Lindows logo is... by Doppler00 · · Score: 1

      Because they sell you the computer, and then run away!

  17. 3 gig by Kadagan+AU · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The machine is agonizingly slow because of its tiny 3GB drive, which the manufacturer said was recycled from an old notebook computer

    Apparently the reviewer doesn't understand all that much about PC hardware. (S)he claims that the machine was slow because of the size of the hard drive!? The only way I can think of that mattering is if it causes you to have less swap space. Yeah, that drive is deinitely too small, but that won't make the machine slower! If it's a slow drive, then that will cut back performance, but when it comes to the speed of access "size doesn't matter". You could make a 3 gig drive that spins at 7200 rpms, and has 8 mb cache, and could be blazing (almost) and still small. That comment discredited everything (s)he said to me. Also, if it's taken from an old notebook, does that mean it's a 2.5" drive?

    I have one more question that (s)he never answered. (S)he said that all but one of them didn't have a monitor included, but never said which came with one. Either I mis-read it, or there's some important information missing here. A 1 GHz system with a monitor for only $199 is incredible. Anyone have any info on that?

    --
    This space for rent, inquire within.
    1. Re:3 gig by Cereal+Box · · Score: 1

      It would make a difference. Laptop drives average something like 4200 RPM (somewhere in that neighborhood) and the "fast" ones are 5400 RPM. That's slow, Einstein.

    2. Re:3 gig by Sprinkels · · Score: 1

      They don't include monitors or (with one exception) floppy drives or modems. One PC has got a floppy drive and the other two do not.

    3. Re:3 gig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Think about it. Opening an application means reading from the hard drive. If the hard drive is slow (By the sounds of it, it was a freaking 2.5" laptop drive!) then your application will take longer to load. Imagine loading Mozilla or OpenOffice.org and how much data you have to read just for the executable image alone.

    4. Re:3 gig by thedbp · · Score: 2, Informative

      well, to be fair, if it was scrounged from a laptop, and it is a 3GB drive, that means its probably old and spins at around 4500 RPM. That will definitely impact the performance of the machine. Especially if its an ATA-33 drive.

      Now, for the price, this kind of performance is fine. But it is viable to say that this hard drive could theoretically be slowing things down. Sounds like the system could be waiting for the drive to feed data if it is as low end as I've postulated.

    5. Re:3 gig by SkreamNet · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Why was this marked insightful? Apparently the poster doesn't understand reading comprehention that well. It doesn't say it's slow because of the size of the drive. It says the machine is slow because of the hard drive, which happens to be a tiny 3GB, and happens to be recycled from a notebook. If the poster understood PC and particularly notebook hardware, the drives are never as fast as their PC counterparts because they generally all spin slower, which is certain to be the case here. That will certainly make your PC slow.

    6. Re:3 gig by verbatim_verbose · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, it does make a difference. If you only have 3 gb of data, a 3gb hard drive will be somewhat slower than 10 gb of the same rpm, cache size, etc. in general use, due mainly to seek time. On the 10gb, the data will be spread around the drive, so when it wants to write, it will only have to go a little way to find an empty spot. The 3gb will have to jump all over the place to find empty spots, and likely fragment data more. Makes sense right?

    7. Re:3 gig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently the reviewer doesn't understand all that much about PC hardware. (S)he claims that the machine was slow because of the size of the hard drive!?

      It is you, that do not understand all that much about what the person meant. A 3 gig hard drive is a very old harddrive, and older harddrives use older technology (ata33 4500rpm) and are therfore much slower than todays harddrives. what is so hard to get?? stop being irritating and use your common sense.

    8. Re:3 gig by Black+Perl · · Score: 1

      If you only have 3 gb of data, a 3gb hard drive will be somewhat slower than 10 gb of the same rpm, cache size, etc. in general use, due mainly to seek time. On the 10gb, the data will be spread around the drive, so when it wants to write, it will only have to go a little way to find an empty spot. The 3gb will have to jump all over the place to find empty spots, and likely fragment data more. Makes sense right?

      No, that makes no sense at all. You are comparing a fragmented drive with an unfragmented drive. Did it ever occur to you that a 10gb drive can be fragmented too?

      The reviewer tested new, out of the box PCs. You can assume the 3GB drive was not yet fragmented. The slowness was due to the fact that it was a notebook drive, which typically have lower RPMs.

      --
      bp
    9. Re:3 gig by phre4k · · Score: 1

      They don't include monitors or (with one exception) floppy drives or modems.

      None of them includes monitors. The exception refers to floppy or modem.

      /Esben

      --
      "Nobody really checks their email any more. They just delete their spam"
    10. Re:3 gig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      From the article:

      "The machine is agonizingly slow because of its tiny 3GB drive...."

      Seems pretty clear to me.

    11. Re:3 gig by Kadagan+AU · · Score: 1

      Thank you for the clarification there, I read the "or" on the other side of the parenthases I think. My bad.

      --
      This space for rent, inquire within.
    12. Re:3 gig by Admiral+Burrito · · Score: 2, Informative

      "Bigger" drives are faster when all else is equal, but not so much for the reason you've stated (fragmentation).

      You mentioned seek time, which is one reason, but not because of fragmentation... If you're only using 3GB of data, on a 3GB disk a read may have to seek from the innermost track to the outermost track and back. With a larger drive 3GB full, it would only be using the outermost tracks, and would not have to seek as far.

      Bigger drives also pack the bits more densely. This means that for every rotation more data is passed by the read/write heads, resulting in a faster transfer rate.

      Higher RPM and bigger drive both give you better transfer rates. What higher RPM also gets you, though, is lower rotational latency. Suppose one part of the disk is under the read head, but the part of the disk you want to read is on the other side of the platter. You have to wait a full half rotation before the data can be read. The higher the RPM the quicker the right part of the platter reaches the read head.

    13. Re:3 gig by NotAnotherReboot · · Score: 1

      In all fairness, laptop hard drives are generally slower anyways. I have a brand new laptop, and 5400 RPM was the fastest I could get. They still sell 4200 RPM drives. If it's from a drive when they were still selling 3 GB laptop HDDs, it's possible it could be even slower.

    14. Re:3 gig by adolf · · Score: 1

      You're right - bigger drives are faster. But your example is, quite simply, misguided and false.

      Fragmentation, the basis of your wild assertion, has nothing to do with overall capacity. It has everything to do with the type of filesystem used, and the size of a block of data to be written and the relative amount of free space.

      Seek time is the same, roughly speaking, between big and small. It's still just a platter (or a stack of them) of about 3 inches in diameter, generally spinning at 5400RPM.

      The heads on a given drive may be able to accelerate faster than those of another, which while leading to lower seek times, has nothing to do with the amount of data on the drive.

      Now then:

      Increased density will increase throughput. Bigger drives are generally denser drives, which means that the bits fly past the head at a greater rate for a given spindle speed. Increased density will not reduce average access times.

      Think now, post later. Mods: Please put the crackpipe down. Thanks.

    15. Re:3 gig by SkreamNet · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      It must not be THAT clear to you, since you're posting as anonymous.

    16. Re:3 gig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Flaimbait my ass, you cocksuckers. You're just all embarassed cause you can't fucking read.

    17. Re:3 gig by savetz · · Score: 1

      The drive was both small AND slow.

      None of the machines included a monitor - you misread. The Tiger Direct machine was the only one to include a modem and floppy drive. The other two, by the way, included floppy drive cables, which I thought was a nice touch. Two of the machines (all except Tiger) included a cheap pair of speakers, another welcome addition for $199.

    18. Re:3 gig by shaitand · · Score: 1

      While the fact that laptop drives are dog slow seems to have gone right over the parents head, what he/she said was that a drive of the same speed in two different capacities genreally will not slow a machine a down.

    19. Re:3 gig by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

      The only way I can think of that mattering is if it causes you to have less swap space.

      Here's another possibility: Because the data on the drive had to be compressed to fit.

      This is a common tactic for Linux distributions that want to stuff in a big assortment of desktop programs. (On the assumption that their users will be unable manage installing anything later, so they need all file-handlers present initially)

      The Knoppix live-cd is the most famous user of this technique. Knoppix provides KDE, OpenOffice.org, Mozilla, Gimp, and other large programs, but it reads them from a compressed archive that further degrades the already low read-speed of a CDROM.

      If the CPU is slow, like on these cheap PCs, then loading compressed files is an even bigger drag.

    20. Re:3 gig by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

      Fragmentation, the basis of your wild assertion, has nothing to do with overall capacity.

      From a theory perspective, total capacity does have something to do with fragmentation.

      Assuming both drives are using the same intelligently designed filesystem (meaning it makes some effort to avoid fragmenting), and that the user creates and edits files in the same order, a smaller disk will suffer fragmentation before a larger one does.

      If a one gig disk has two files on it, A and B, and then file A is appended to be 501 megabytes in size, it will probably be fragmented. On a 10 gig drive, it may still be contiguously stored, just from natural writing.

    21. Re:3 gig by adolf · · Score: 1

      Perhaps.

      Essentially, what you're saying is this: As hard drives fill up, things become more likely to be written in fragments. (Nature? What nature?)

      However, I'm in no position to assume that a 3 gig drive is more likely to be full than a 30 gig drive. More than anything else, this is dependant on the user.

      Therefore, about all we might be able to theorize is:

      Some users are prone to fragmentation, while others have a tendancy to be contiguous. Which should be obvious after spending more than a few hours associating with other people. ;)

  18. I know it's commonplace, but by loomis · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I know it's commonplace in newswriting, but the contradictory style of the author is particularly annoying in this review:

    "A $200 Computer Can Perform, Barely" [emphasis added]

    "[. . .] but they generally worked surprisingly well and offered room to grow"

    And soforth. Why not just put a positive headline as opposed to putting a negative headline and contradicting it throughout your article? I know I know, negative headline increases readership. Feh.

    Loomis

    --
    "The television is the retina of the mind's eye" - Videodrome
    1. Re:I know it's commonplace, but by BorgCopyeditor · · Score: 2, Informative
      I know it's commonplace in newswriting, but the contradictory style of the author is particularly annoying in this review

      You seem to assume that the person writing the article also writes the headline. That's not commonplace.

      --
      Shop as usual. And avoid panic buying.
    2. Re:I know it's commonplace, but by Pfhreakaz0id · · Score: 1

      that was going to be my post. As a former newspaper guy, it seems to be the most surprising thing I tell people. Most often, not only did you have ZERO input on the headline, if you were a daytime reporter, it probably wasn't even written until several hours after you left work.

  19. Bubba Asks??? by Arbogast_II · · Score: 1

    Has anyone actually used a Lindows machine. I have a program I want low tech relatives to use, that needs Perl and Tk. The comp would be for that and web surfing.

    Some of the relatives might be freaked out by a cheap, powerful Suse Linux PC from a top notch mom and pop computer store. Believe it or not, they would feel more comfortable with a computer from Wal Mart (kinda mysttfying to the tech savvy I realize).

    Does Perl, Tk and CPAN work on it, out of the box, or does that require buying the upgrade???

    --


    HenryJamesFeltus.com
    1. Re:Bubba Asks??? by BlackHawk-666 · · Score: 1

      You could always blow away the Lindows install and put distro of choice on it before handing it over to the family. All the good distros cover Tk and Perl.

      --
      All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain.
    2. Re:Bubba Asks??? by shaitand · · Score: 1

      ummm lindows is just a modified gui sitting on top of linux. Can say I remember whether it has perl installed by default but last I checked you don't need to buy anything to install perl or tk on linux?

      90% of the lindows point and click stuff are just apps that are already available for free on the web, all you have to do install apt and synaptic on the box and your past that.

  20. no, very sophisticated ispell by jtheory · · Score: 4, Informative

    It also apparently lacks Ispell.

    Sure, the *English* word is panacea.

    But the GREEK word that panacea is derived from is "panakeia" -- spelled as in the posting -- meaning (like the English word) a cure-all.

    I am not making this up:
    http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=pana cea

    --
    There are only 10 types of people: those who understand decimal, those who don't, and, uh, 8 other types I forget.
    1. Re:no, very sophisticated ispell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, wait, is Slashdot in Greek or English again?

    2. Re:no, very sophisticated ispell by scasagrande · · Score: 4, Funny

      "So, there you go. All is from Greek!"

    3. Re:no, very sophisticated ispell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You like-a the juice?

    4. Re:no, very sophisticated ispell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      cheeseburger cheeseburger pepsi chips

  21. Who is Lindows for? by revividus · · Score: 4, Funny
    I'm sorry, I still have a hard time figuring out who Lindows is aimed at. It seems like J. Random User is going to be far more comfortable with Win*, and stay there. Linux newbies are probably going to prefer Redhat or Mandrake (or a Knoppix install), and Linux wizards are probably already using debian or gentoo or [insert your favorite distro].

    It seems to be a distro aimed at software-review journalists.

    I'll end with my favorite lines from the review:

    Although it's possible to install Microsoft Windows on these machines, it can be tricky. Plus, a copy of Windows XP Home Edition costs about as much as one of these PCs.

    Something about this strikes me as being really funny, but I'm not quite sure what it is. (Though I know XP home is only about $99, now, but, whatever...)

    1. Re:Who is Lindows for? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      People who want a $200 PC that looks and feels like Windows, and does most of what they want.

      You know, like people who buy their computers at Wal-Mart.

    2. Re:Who is Lindows for? by confused+one · · Score: 1
      someone who wants a dirt cheap computer strickly for e-mail and a little web browsing. They may occasionally write a letter or paper for class. Someone with no money who doesn't have access to e-bay.

      Say, my mother or my sisters.

    3. Re:Who is Lindows for? by yppiz · · Score: 1
      I'm sorry, I still have a hard time figuring out who Lindows is aimed at. It seems like J. Random User is going to be far more comfortable with Win*, and stay there.

      J Random User is equally unfamiliar with all operating systems and doesn't care which one the computer is running. For these users, the browser is "the internet." They don't care about the control panel or the command line.

      --Pat / zippy@cs.brandeis.edu

    4. Re:Who is Lindows for? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      home edition is crippled version of the pro edition, which is a windows OS (still cripled by default). Nobody should use or suggest teh use of home edition XP. If you must use Windows aleast use the pro edition

    5. Re:Who is Lindows for? by WARM3CH · · Score: 1

      You don't know? It's pretty simple. It's for those who like to pay money for the free software! And guess what? you have to pay each year, again and again to access all those free software over the net....

    6. Re:Who is Lindows for? by Jason+Earl · · Score: 1

      Lindows is marketed at someone who has $200 and wants a computer for basic computing tasks. You can't get a machine running Windows for that much money, and even if you could it would come with essentially no other software. One of the major advantages that Linux has is that it comes complete with an impressive array of software.

      My inlaws, for example, needed a new computer, but the only thing that they use the computer for is a little bit of web browsing, a tiny bit of wordprocessing, and email. The Lindows box fit their needs very well. They love the thing. Fortunately their printer and digital camera were compatible with Linux (I checked beforehand).

      The other people who might be interested in these machines are folks that want a fully assembled machine, with a warranty, but who don't want to pay for an operating system. I bought a machine from Wal-Mart that now runs Debian, but a buddy of mine bought one that he installed Windows XP on. He apparently had a license from another machine that he wasn't using.

      As people start purchasing machines sans operating system they will start to realize that Windows does indeed carry a price tag. That's a good thing.

    7. Re:Who is Lindows for? by rakkasan · · Score: 1

      Just to clarify, $99 buys you an XP home edition upgrade from Windows 2000 or ME. Not a clean install OEM version of XP Home, that one runs $199 same price as the Win XP Pro upgrade. XP Pro OEM is $299 last time I checked.

      --
      The problem is choice..
    8. Re:Who is Lindows for? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    9. Re:Who is Lindows for? by revividus · · Score: 1
      I agree that the price tag is great.... But I was sort of asking who Lindows is for. You say that both you and your friend run an OS other than Lindows on the boxes you purchased.

      But then you answer my question by pointing out that your inlaws use Lindows... So I think I have a reasonable idea of the target market for Lindows boxes....

      1. Journalists doing software reviews: 25%
      2. Relatives of /.ers and other geeks: 25%
      3. *nix geeks who want a $200 box, but plan to run a different OS: 50%
      I'm just guessing. The third category might be a lot higher... :)
    10. Re:Who is Lindows for? by rsheridan6 · · Score: 1
      Try J. Random Cheapass. My paycheck-to-paycheck living brother-in-law asked for my advice on what computer to buy. I told him to get one of these and put a pirated copy of Windows on it (he has Windows only boring business software he needs to run). For most people who are looking for a dirt-cheap system, these machines with either Lindows or Windows XPirated would be adequate.

      People like this are not going to know the difference between RedHat, Mandrake, or Lindows. They want it because it meets their needs cheaply, not because it's Linux.

      If Linux takes off on the desktop, I would think it would be among the poor and in the 3rd world, first. I recall spending over $2000 on a computer while earning $8 an hour at a McJob, several years ago - a big purchase, but one I could afford to make. One of these $200 Lindows machines would be an equivalent chunk of change to someone who makes 80 cents an hour. Time for Nike sweatshop workers to get free pr0n too?

      --
      Don't drop the soap, Tommy!
  22. Panakeia? by ahamos · · Score: 0, Redundant

    What the hell is a panakeia? What's wrong with using a spell-checker? PANACEA PANACEA PANACEA And while I'm on the subject, there is no "a" in "definite" or "definitely".

    I hate making flame-bait, but dammit, we're supposed to be the intellectual frontiersmen, here.

    1. Re:Panakeia? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      we're supposed to be the intellectual frontiersmen

      Hello, welcome to slashdot! You're new here, aren't you?

  23. Not reviewing Lindows, just the bare bones boxes by jon323456 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yet another disappointing review whose title should really be âoeA review of the barebones hardware you can get for $200 at Walmart.â There are two, count em, two sentences about Lindows in the whole story:

    All three came preinstalled with Lindows, a version of the Linux operating system designed for home users. But Lindows has drawbacks, notably poor support for USB peripherals such as digital cameras and scanners.

    Dissapointing that they missed the opportunity to really talk about if this is the PC for grandma, or the other novice users who would be buying a PC so low on the dollar spectrum.

  24. Not what i got.... by 222 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Im not sure at which point this year he picked these machines up, but within the past month ive picked up a few of the walmart variety, and ive got to say that theyre fine. I purchased the 200 dollar model and i got a 1.2GHz Duron,128,nic,sound,video,20GB HD...(Ironically, im installing mandrake on one now).
    For the low low price of just 217 (My shipping was much lower than his?), i got this guy shipped right to my doorstep. Honestly, theyre great. Fantastic.
    Although i wasnt the biggest supporter of Lindows before, after seeing it in action, it really is what my grandmother would need to use Linux. (It even comes with a recovery CD)
    Its also worth mentioning that for an extra couple hundred (was $397 for me with shipping) you can have a 14.1 inch flatpanel included with that. As far as the quality goes, its nothing id use for proffesional imaging, but for surfing and sims its more than fine.
    Sounds like a deal to me.
    And NO, i dont work for walmart.com :p

    1. Re:Not what i got.... by bcrowell · · Score: 0, Redundant
      I'm writing this on a similar machine from Fry's. It's a generic PC made by a Chinese company called Great Quality, has a VIA Samuel CPU, 20 Gb disk. I actually like the CPU, because it's low power, so I can leave the machine on 24/7 without wasting too much energy. Came with something called ThizLinux, but I'm currently running FreeBSD. The only real problem I've had is that of the two boxes I bought from them, one didn't come with enough documentation for me to figure out how to get sound working. The modem is a Winmodem, which ThizLinux has drivers for, but I just replaced it with an external modem. The hardware seems rock-solid so far. I have one box I bought 12 months ago, and another I bought just recently. Neither has given me any problems.

      One possible advantage of these over WalMart PCs is that AFAIK you can only buy the WalMart boxes via mail order, whereas if you have a Fry's nearby, you can buy one of these and avoid paying for shipping.

      Speed hasn't been a problem for me at all, as long as I pick and choose which software to run. I use KDE instead of GNOME, because Nautilus was so slow on the version of GNOME that I tried. I also use xterm instead of konsole, because konsole has an annoyingly slow startup time. Yeah, Mozilla takes a long time to start up, but it's only the same amount of time that it takes for the modem to dial, so who cares? It's not the ultimate game machine, of course. Frozen Bubbles and LTris are fine, but Mame runs pretty slow.

  25. I Wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I wonder how many people will catch on to the quote at the end where the author mentions that Windows XP Home costs as much as the entire PC + Linux. With luck, it'll make some folks think.

    1. Re:I Wonder by m1chael · · Score: 0

      its cheaper than windows? i must be crapper than windows! they would say.

      the solution is charging as much as microsoft does.

      --
      I know you are psychotic, but please make an effort.
  26. oh... i figured it out.. by felesii · · Score: 2, Funny

    Microsoft: "Drop Dead!" Lindows: "I don't do requests" I got nothing

  27. Not that easy for Joe Sixpack... by TrollBridge · · Score: 4, Insightful
    "Hell add another $59.00 and you can get a low end Geforce 4 and make it scream for games."

    And don't forget another hundred or so for a new hard drive that can hold said games, and a few hours to replace the old video card and HD and install the OS on it, and figure out how to install the NVIDIA drivers, and oh shit, this just went WAY beyond the capabilities of Joe Sixpack.

    --
    There's a Mercedes gap too. I want one and can't afford one, but it's not government's job to do anything about it.
    1. Re:Not that easy for Joe Sixpack... by Doug+Neal · · Score: 1

      Yep that's why Mr Sixpack in question buys a slightly more expensive computer if that's what he wants to do on it.

      These are low spec, low price machines... don't expect great things of them. If you can upgrade it to play games, then great.. but that's not what they're for, and not what they're priced for, so it's not really fair to slate them for it being outside the capability of the average user to do so, is it?

  28. Good value by h00pla · · Score: 5, Informative
    On a business/pleasure trip to the US back in October (2002) , I bought a Lindows machine from Walmart. I ordered the modem for it and that brought the price up to 226 USD (because where I was going to be staying didn't have DSL in the area). The keyboard was total crap, but I went to a local mall and forked over some cash for a decent one. Lindows pretty much did everything I needed it to do and it ran pretty well. First thing I did was to create a user account for myself. (don't wanna be running as root, do we?)

    When my trip was finished, it fit into my big Samsonite and I took it back with me. I did two things when I got back home - move the power supply button to 220 and the switch the OS to SuSE Linux. I changed to SuSE because I like that distro more than Michael Robertson's 'apt-get' for a fee'. That's the weakest part of the whole deal.

    I just put Red Hat 9 on the box about a week ago. It runs a little slower, but pretty well all in all. I think it was a good value. It's on all the time and it stands up pretty well. If it runs for a year, it's paid itself back.

    --
    I've been swashdotted -- Elmer Fudd
  29. Re:What the crap?! (OT) by SirTwitchALot · · Score: 0

    But I am logged in, hence my posts are under my login, and I don't browse at the default... I think there's a conspiracy by Slashdot or the Aliens or the Druids to destroy my sanity.... or something like that

    --
    Go away, or I will replace you with a very small shell script.
  30. Re:What the crap?! (OT) by kalidasa · · Score: 3, Informative

    The panakeia / panacea error is not, technically speaking, a typo. It is a language error: panakeia is the Greek spelling of the Greek word, panacea the Latin transliteration. In English, words "naturalized" from Greek before ~1900 are spelled with the Latin transliteration (because most often they were, in fact, borrowed from Latin, which had borrowed them from Greek); after ~1900 with a stricter transliteration. The English spelling is of course panacea.

  31. Good enough? by stevenp · · Score: 3, Informative

    >> Despite their scaled-back features, these computers run on AMD Duron 1.0- or 1.1GHz processors, making them speedy enough for word processing, Internet access, working with digital pictures and playing some games.

    I think 1GHz is MORE than good enough for word processing and internet browsing. I was doing the said activities on a 100 MHz machine back in the old days without much trouble. Otherwise the review is fair and notes that the machines are able to do what they are designed for.

    1. Re:Good enough? by confused+one · · Score: 1

      This is true; but, 100MHz doesn't run modern (read as: current) incarnations of X or KDE well. That, and, you can't get 100MHz chips anymore, except for embedded applications.

    2. Re:Good enough? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I did word processing at 2.5 MHz. No Internet available to me at the time, though.

    3. Re:Good enough? by natefanaro · · Score: 1

      Agreed. I read this and thought "Damn, I have a 900Mhz machine and now it't worthless!"

      The hardware that's out now is way too much for the average user. I used to do tech support for a PC manufacturer and customers would ask me about "the fastest machine they could get their hands on" and I would sigh. The price gap between mid and high end is so large and when you don't know how to shut down a pc (without hitting the power button) and you are calling me for tech support on how to change your desktop pattern, you don't need that fast of a machine.

    4. Re:Good enough? by bricriu · · Score: 1

      I'm running Gnome 2.2 on a 233 mHz Pentium II with 128 megs RAM pretty darn well. Loadup-time on Moz. and OO.o are a drag, but once they're there, they multi-task wonderfully along with XMMS, GAIM and misc. consoles.

      Now, the 100 mHz Toshiba laptop I have... that's a whole other story. 40 megs of RAM means I can't even run Winamp + anything.

      My MAIN machine is a 1.3 GHz P4. Works incrediibly well as a Java dev machine, Tomcat server, game station, Photoshop diddler, etc, often simultaneously.

      --

      AHHHHHHH! I'm burning with goodness again!
      - Reakk, Sluggy Freelance

    5. Re:Good enough? by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1
      I was doing the said activities on a 100 MHz machine back in the old days without much trouble.

      That reminds me of an argument that one of my college profs made in one of my classes in the early 80s. He was making a point about system reliability. It went something like:

      "Let's say that your organization has installed a 100 MIPS machine. Let's also assume that they have achieved 90% uptime on that system. That 90% sounds good - until you realize that the 10% downtime is wasting 10 of those MIPS. I bet that you would all just love to have your very own 10 MIPS machine to play with! That's what you're throwing away if you don't pay enough attention to availability."

      Now we make arguments that an entire 100 MIPS machine is theoretically just adequate to write an e-mail (but nobody would really want to suffer it). I guess the uptime argument really doesn't carry much weight any more.

    6. Re:Good enough? by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      "I think 1GHz is MORE than good enough for word processing and internet browsing. I was doing the said activities on a 100 MHz machine back in the old days"

      The OLD DAYS? I was doing professional wordprocessing and 2-d graphic design on a 33 MHZ IBM PS/2. Internet usage was limited to a 3270 emulator, but that ran fine. That was fairly recent, to my thinking.

      In the old days I did my wordprocessing on a 4 MHZ Kaypro running CP/M. I've never seen the same productivity that I had back then -- not that I'd like to go back to it.

      Before that, I had to write my own editor, and before that, I used the EDTASM editor on my TRS-80. And before that, an ASR-33 teletype and paper tape. Now, I'll start to concede that THOSE were the old days, but the days of 100MHZ PC's were *YESTERDAY*.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    7. Re:Good enough? by Carrot007 · · Score: 1

      > I was doing the said activities on a 100 MHz machine back in the old days without much trouble.

      Bah you make me feel old. I started word processing on my speccy (+3, tape would have probably put me off a bit)) way back sometime, and I still have the printer somewhere about here! (panasonic kxp-1081 i think) Come to think of it I probably still have the machine! bet the disk drives dead though!

      --
      +----------------- | What is the question!
    8. Re:Good enough? by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

      The uptime argument is now more important than ever. Today, all computers are very fast. 700Mhz, 1Ghz, 3.2Ghz... it hardly even matters. For any normal task, they're essentially equivalent. The CPU spends 99% of its time waiting for an operator or remote system to give it an input, and then takes between 0.001 and 0.00042 milliseconds to return the response, before going back to idle mode.

      In a world like this, the dollar value of the speed increase between 700Mhz and 3Ghz is tiny. But if the slower computer has 99% uptime and the faster one only 90%, then the slower box gives your enterprise much more productivity.

      For most computer tasks, reliablity is far more important than speed.

  32. My Fervent Hope by 4of12 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    is that in the drive to push the price of Lindows PCs down far below Windows PCs and to sell to a mass market, that some good means are made available for utilizing software modems (a.k.a. Winmodems) that have plagued Linux users for years as (i)being ubiquitous, (ii) having proprietary, hard to decipher interfaces.

    --
    "Provided by the management for your protection."
  33. Re:Ah, mods by Crazy_Vasey · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    On my Radeon 9500 X wouldn't even start after I installed the drivers. Useless. This was with the latest Red Hat release, and the latest binaries from the ATI website.

  34. Review? What article did *you* read? by untaken_name · · Score: 1, Interesting

    This isn't a review. This is a freaking ad for these things. I've seen more in-depth info on freaking packaging. This isn't even a good *description* of these things, just a tiny blurb.
    I wouldn't buy *anything* based on information this limited. Well, maybe if it had really complex and shiny packaging. That makes *any* product better.

  35. Joe ServicePack can buy WindowsXP by jkrise · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    The price of convenience is the effort to understand technology. If Joe ServicePack cannot put in the effort, he deserves the latest Service Pack and the associated hell from MS.

    Linux (any flavor) is not for Joe.

    --
    If you keep throwing chairs, one day you'll break windows....
    1. Re:Joe ServicePack can buy WindowsXP by TrollBridge · · Score: 3, Insightful
      "Linux (any flavor) is not for Joe."

      And as long as the Linux community maintains this elitist attitude, it will NEVER replace/defeat Windows.

      --
      There's a Mercedes gap too. I want one and can't afford one, but it's not government's job to do anything about it.
    2. Re:Joe ServicePack can buy WindowsXP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Linux (any flavor) is not for Joe.
      Yeah - he likes to be able to play games and swap documents with his friends without all that boring tinkering that doesn't even work properly.
    3. Re:Joe ServicePack can buy WindowsXP by jkrise · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "And as long as the Linux community maintains this elitist attitude, it will NEVER replace/defeat Windows."

      And as long as Joe is reluctant to understand (not even learn) Linux, he doesn't deserve it. It isn't elitism, just practical wisdom.

      If Joe depends on hotmail spam to get his education (free diplomas), his money (free credit checks) and his wisdom (sponsored study reports), he deserves what he gets from the present owners of said e-mail service.

      Linux helps those who refuse to believe all they hear.

      --
      If you keep throwing chairs, one day you'll break windows....
    4. Re:Joe ServicePack can buy WindowsXP by no+reason+to+be+here · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Who exactly is joe service pack?

      My girlfriend doesn't understand tech, but she would be just fine with one of these Lindows PC's. she writes papers and checks her e-mail on her computer, and that's pretty much it. She doesn't need to understand tech, nor should she have to. She doesn't understand how an internal combustion engine works, nor do most Americans, but she can drive a car just fine (in fact, she's a better driver than most people I know, myself included).

      Your attitude is not simply just why Linux hasn't caught on, it's also why people at large hold geeks up to ridicule and scorn.

    5. Re:Joe ServicePack can buy WindowsXP by TrollBridge · · Score: 1
      "And as long as Joe is reluctant to understand (not even learn) Linux, he doesn't deserve it."

      And in the meantime, Bill Gates is getting richer and richer from Joe Sixpack because the Linux community is too proud to adapt to a broader market. That's worse than simple elitism, it's bad business sense.

      --
      There's a Mercedes gap too. I want one and can't afford one, but it's not government's job to do anything about it.
    6. Re:Joe ServicePack can buy WindowsXP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you know how your car works? How the last airplane you flew on works? How the last meal you ate was made?

    7. Re:Joe ServicePack can buy WindowsXP by jkrise · · Score: 1

      "in the meantime, Bill Gates is getting richer and richer from Joe Sixpack because the Linux community is too proud to adapt to a broader market."

      You've got it backwards. If Joe can't adapt and adopt Linux, he's condemned to surrender his riches to Billyboy.

      "That's worse than simple elitism, it's bad business sense."

      To assume that it's the PC that should be smart and not Joe ServicePack that's operating it - it's not plain stupidity, it's stubbornness as well.

      --
      If you keep throwing chairs, one day you'll break windows....
    8. Re:Joe ServicePack can buy WindowsXP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How the last meal you ate was made?

      Unless you dine out every night, or only ever eat McDonalds, I would hope that you generally understand how food is prepared.

    9. Re:Joe ServicePack can buy WindowsXP by TrollBridge · · Score: 1
      "To assume that it's the PC that should be smart and not Joe ServicePack that's operating it - it's not plain stupidity, it's stubbornness as well."

      So I guess the whole concept of a GUI, or even a mouse and keyboard for that matter, was a bad idea? It's not making it "smart", it's called making it intuitive.

      And like other posters have pointed out, would you suggest that a motorist should at least know how to replace a broken timing belt or understand the mechanical workings of an automatic transmission before they can be considered "qualified" to drive a car?

      --
      There's a Mercedes gap too. I want one and can't afford one, but it's not government's job to do anything about it.
    10. Re:Joe ServicePack can buy WindowsXP by jkrise · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "would you suggest that a motorist should at least know how to replace a broken timing belt"

      I suggested nothing of that sort. I merely opined that Joe ServicePack must, in his own interest, learn that Linux is GPL'd code, free for inspection and modification, that it's much superior to Windows XYZ in elegance and design, that it's free from viruses, that the SCO FUD is rubbish, that copying Linux CDs is not a guilty act, that sharing Linux and associated knowledge is not analagous to sharing music (as SCO implies) etc. etc.

      Until Joe stops believing the bad press and 'informed' opinions such as yours, he can't overcome the first crucial hurdle to start using Linux. And it is unreasonable to expect Linux or GNU to evangelise, educate, enlighten, aggressively market, promote or teach Joe. It isn't elitism, merely practical wisdom.

      --
      If you keep throwing chairs, one day you'll break windows....
    11. Re:Joe ServicePack can buy WindowsXP by Hobbex · · Score: 1

      jkrise wrote: Linux (any flavor) is not for Joe.

      TrollBridge wrote: And as long as the Linux community maintains this elitist attitude, it will NEVER replace/defeat Windows.

      I have always been wondering who this "Linux community" person was - thanks for finding him for us!

    12. Re:Joe ServicePack can buy WindowsXP by TrollBridge · · Score: 1
      "Until Joe stops believing the bad press and 'informed' opinions such as yours

      What have I said about Linux that isn't true?

      "...he can't overcome the first crucial hurdle to start using Linux."

      Such as people like you telling him he's too dumb to use Linux?

      "And it is unreasonable to expect Linux or GNU to evangelise, educate, enlighten, aggressively market, promote or teach Joe."

      That's what popular sites like Slashdot are for, or at least should be. Instead it is used as a platform to take shots at the likes of Microsoft and SCO. A much more productive use of the site's popularity would be to educate both Joe Sixpack as well as the seasoned Linux user. However, the popular sentiment (as you have clearly reinforced) seems to be that Joe Sixpack is not worth our time and effort.

      --
      There's a Mercedes gap too. I want one and can't afford one, but it's not government's job to do anything about it.
    13. Re:Joe ServicePack can buy WindowsXP by jkrise · · Score: 1

      Mr. Troll:
      Please do me a favor. Read thru the thread of posts starting from my original post. Carefully. Then consider who's inhibiting Joe and who's motivating Joe to pick up a Linux distro.

      (Hint : I've said Understand Linux. Not learn or learn to use Linux. Even Joe can spot the meaning and the significance.)

      Now, sit back as the enormity of what you've done - sinks in. Relax. Joe is more clever these days than we choose to give credit for.

      --
      If you keep throwing chairs, one day you'll break windows....
    14. Re:Joe ServicePack can buy WindowsXP by TrollBridge · · Score: 1
      "I have always been wondering who this "Linux community" person was - thanks for finding him for us!"

      It would be naive to believe that our friend jkrise is alone in his beliefs. Perhaps I'm guilty of generalizing Linux users (or maybe at least the ones who frequently post here), but I find the idea that the average PC user is too dumb to (at least learn to) use Linux is common here, and not particularly productive.

      --
      There's a Mercedes gap too. I want one and can't afford one, but it's not government's job to do anything about it.
    15. Re:Joe ServicePack can buy WindowsXP by aurelian · · Score: 1
      Your attitude is not simply just why Linux hasn't caught on, it's also why people at large hold geeks up to ridicule and scorn.

      No that would be the body odour, matted hair and bad breath.

    16. Re:Joe ServicePack can buy WindowsXP by TrollBridge · · Score: 1
      "I've said Understand Linux. Not learn or learn to use Linux. Even Joe can spot the meaning and the significance."

      Joe probably doesn't really care that information wants to be free, or that Linux is a fight against the evil Microsoft empire. Joe doesn't want a philosophy, he wants an OS that lets him do what he wants to do. If it doesn't cost him any money, that much the better!

      A lot of people (myself included) are turned off by the evangelizing nature of some Linux proponents. They feel like they're being talked down to when they're told to "RTFM", or that non-Linux users "deserve what they get". If Linux was promoted as a feasable, easy-to-learn OS, instead of a noble philosophical crusade of the free against the oppressors, I think more people would be inclined to try it out.

      But telling them that they need to understand the philosophy behind Linux probably turns them off to it before they've even tried it.

      --
      There's a Mercedes gap too. I want one and can't afford one, but it's not government's job to do anything about it.
    17. Re:Joe ServicePack can buy WindowsXP by AstroDrabb · · Score: 1

      You don't need to undertand the internals of the kernel to use Linux. You don't need to understand C, C++, Perl, Sed, Awk, etc to use Linux. With driving a car you are expected to know how to use the gas and brake pedels, the steering wheel and shifter. You are also required to know the rules and laws of the road. It is very similar with Linux. You need to know how to use a keyboard and mouse. You also are expected to want to learn a little and most importantly, you need to know HOW to ask and where to go. www.google.com is great, they even have a site just for Linux searches at www.google.com/linux. There are also great mailing list to get help at such as:

      http://groups.yahoo.com/group/redhat/
      and
      http://groups.yahoo.com/group/linux/

      Myself and several others put in MANY hours each week to help help ALL Linux users. There are only a few rules, no top-posting, not HTML mails, and try to find the answer BEFORE you ask.

      --
      If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
      it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
    18. Re:Joe ServicePack can buy WindowsXP by Delphix · · Score: 1

      Until Joe stops believing the bad press and 'informed' opinions such as yours, he can't overcome the first crucial hurdle to start using Linux

      You make Linux sound like a bad cult. I've been using Linux since 1996 and it certainly isn't for everyone. Case in point. The Red Hat 8.0 install. I decided I would cleanse myself of the evil Microsoft and go straight over to Linux on the desktop.

      Boy was I wrong. Got past the install, and low and behold the first problem was my ethernet card. The drivers it installed were crap. I'd go get new ones, but wait...I have no internet connection. Boot back into Windows... Download the only version later than that, a beta none the less. Get it compiled against the kernel source. All is good...sort of. Now I want ICQ. Whoops, no Licq build for GCC 3.0. Get the lastest daily source. Recompile. Friend sends me an MP3. XMMS doesn't do MP3s anymore in the default install. Track down the rpm. Friend ICQs me a mpg. No player... have to track to down the source for an engine and a program. Modify the compile options because GCC 3.0 now requires -libstdc++ and doesn't include it by default. Get that going. Then I decided I wanted to scan some photos. No drivers...

      If the average home user can figure that out, they're not the average home user. A user should not need to do all that just to do basic tasks the computer/OS was designed for.

      At this point I cursed the day I downloaded that damned Red Hat 8.0 CDs. I love Linux for development. Enigma (7.2) is wonderful. But I'll be damned if it ever becomes my desktop OS unless they fix some serious ease of use Issues. I went back to WinXP and have yet to have a single problem since. Maybe Microsoft has something going for them after all.

    19. Re:Joe ServicePack can buy WindowsXP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Do you know how your car works?

      Yes. I'm not only a physics major, I'm also a hobbyist mechanic. I practically built my car. I did build the engine. It's not complicated or particularly difficult to understand.

      >How the last airplane you flew on works?

      Most of the basic principles I understand fine. The specific workings of the nav/comm electronics and radar interest me a great deal, but the structure of the airframe, the physics of lift and propulsion, and the general operation of the Boeing engine are all pretty easy to understand.

      >How the last meal you ate was made?

      It was a sandwich made from roast beef that I bought from a butcher, and bread that I baked from scratch, using flour that I myself ground from grain. I know all about how the butcher stuff happened, as well as the growing and harvesting of the tomato, onion, and lettuce. I grew up on a farm.

    20. Re:Joe ServicePack can buy WindowsXP by sco08y · · Score: 1

      Linux helps those who refuse to believe all they hear.

      GNU/Linux is an operating system. It's not a damned religion. (Substitute Christ for Linux: Christ helps those who refuse to belive all they hear.) Linux is a tool to get a job done.

      People don't "understand" their tools, they just use them and the tools just work. You don't "understand" your car, you just drive somewhere... understanding is never an issue until the vehicle malfunctions.

      That it doesn't simply work and the *extent* to which it doesn't work is why GNU/Linux is, currently, a failure. Yes, that applies to most other operating systems, though still to lesser degrees than with Linux.

    21. Re:Joe ServicePack can buy WindowsXP by Solarian · · Score: 1

      Then maybe it is advantageous that a "dumbed down" version of Linux is preinstalled on these machines. They can then start using the computer. Once they have gotten their basic computing tasks out of the way, they can sit down and play with the mechanism. They can finally lean what the hell all this Linux nonsense is. They didn't have to learn what rxvt is. Nor whether they need the "Apache" to use their computer. Ohh, and get this, they didn't have to learn how to translate a bitmask and figure out those bloody permissions. (what the hell does 750 mean again? Let me call my friendly neighborhood linux tech. Oh wait, he said he wouldn't talk to me anymore) However, if he wants to learn those (now that he has linux, no thanks to all those elitists) concepts, he has the ability to. And he only had to pay USD $200. Not a bad bargin!

    22. Re:Joe ServicePack can buy WindowsXP by conteXXt · · Score: 2, Insightful

      if people don't "understand" their cars, Pep boys et all are sure in for a huge wakeup call.

      It boils down to this: learn things and save money (and get smarter as a side bonus)

      --
      The truth about Led Zep should never be told on /. (Karma suicide ensues)
    23. Re:Joe ServicePack can buy WindowsXP by FueledByRamen · · Score: 1

      Yes, yes, and yes.

      The mechanical energy produced by an internal-combustion engine is transmitted to a "transmission" through means of a rotating shaft. The "transmission" allows the driver (or an onboard computer) to select the optimal gear ratio between the engine and the differential, which attaches the output shaft of the transmission to the wheels. (An obviously simplified version, I could go into how a modern 4-stroke ICE works...)

      A plane uses its rudder, ailerons, and elevator panes to change its yaw, roll, and pitch respectively. Now, the plane uses its wings to generate 'lift' through the movement of air across both surfaces of said wings which, when pitched slightly up, create a high pressure center under the wing. Now, the air pressure under the wings is greater than the air pressure over top of the wings, which has been reduced due to the faster (relative to the bottom surface) movement of air over the wing, in effect creating a vacuum above the wing. This air pressure differential leads to the wing being 'lifted' as it seeks an equalization of pressures. The jet engines tucked under the wings of most planes are a bit harder to explain without diagrams, so I'll just use an ICE/prop combo instead. The propeller works on the same principle as the wing - a curved surface facing the front of the plane and a (relatively) flat surface facing out, with the blade at an angle. It does produce lift (think helicopter) if it's oriented horizontally, but because it needs to produce thrust, it instead is vertical, sucking the plane through the air.

      The last meal I ate consisted of a hamburger patty loosely attached to some bread. Now hamburger is made in a very interesting way. Cows are led up into a factory, where they are shot by a device closely resembling a large pneumatic nailgun, driving a spike through their heads and (presumably) killing them instantly. (Note that with the scare over mad cow disease, this has probably changed, as that method tends to spread brain tissue and spinal fluid everywhere.) The carcass is then ground up (basically all of it), and formed into logs. These hamburger logs are then chopped into patties and cooked on a large griddle, slapped on a bun, and given to the consumer. The bread involved is produced by mixing flour, yeast, a little baking soda, sugar, and a few other miscellaneous chemicals, and then baking the hell out of it until it looks vaguely like a bun. It is then sprinkled with sesame seeds and chopped in half.

      Care for any more of my insights? I'll be here all night.

      --
      Every cloud has a silver lining (except for the mushroom shaped ones, which have a lining of Iridium & Strontium 90)
    24. Re:Joe ServicePack can buy WindowsXP by Arandir · · Score: 1

      and try to find the answer BEFORE you ask.

      How rude! This poor guy doesn't know anything, asks an innocent question, and you go and tell him to RTFM!

      Seriously, I'm on a few FreeBSD lists, and everytime someone asks a question that's been answered twenty times in the past week, I usually answer "your answer is in chapter three section six of the handbook. You can find it online at http:..., or installed on your system at /usr/share/doc..." I figure that's polite, will let the poster know where to find his own answers next time, etc. But ALWAYS some person comes along and says I'm a horrible FreeBSD elitist for not coming out and giving them a complete detailed technical answer.

      So keep being an elitist prick. Eventually we will train these newbies that volunteer community support people aren't there to do their reading for them.

      --
      A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
    25. Re:Joe ServicePack can buy WindowsXP by mniskin · · Score: 0

      The problem is not with RedHat. It's with you. Millions of people use 8.0 without any of the problems you're complaining about. It's smart to upgrade to the latest version after it's been out for a month or two just in case.

    26. Re:Joe ServicePack can buy WindowsXP by shaitand · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Of course, simply because it's in the manual doesn't mean the manual entry really answers the question, or that it makes any damn sense. Many times I've helped users simply be rephrasing what is in the manual (that they've already looked at) and translating it to english.

      Manuals try to pack a lot of information into a little space (mainly because there is a lot to document, the things being documented generally don't lend themselves to it, and most of those doing the documenting don't want to do any more typing than they have to.) so generally this isn't very readable to your average user.

    27. Re:Joe ServicePack can buy WindowsXP by shaitand · · Score: 1

      As long as Joe doesn't get off his ass and learn something about what he's working with, or start being willing to pay someone who DOES know wtf they are doing to do it for him, we don't want him.

      There's a reason linux has a tendency to stay wherever it's installed... it's WORTH the learning curve. Yes there is a learning curve if you want to get any real work done, but your productivity is ten fold. Once your past that curve it's several fold easier to acomplish day to day tasks with your system than it is with a windows based pc. Remember, your average linux user is more qualified to administrate a windows system than the top professionals who work with windows... and they make their choice.

    28. Re:Joe ServicePack can buy WindowsXP by shaitand · · Score: 1

      I have never met someone who can't open an rtf document.

      Refer to transgaming.com for games, you'll find dozens of full blown CURRENT 3d titles.

    29. Re:Joe ServicePack can buy WindowsXP by human10 · · Score: 1

      My mother is using my old Pentium machine (I bought it in 1995) works well for her kind of Web browsing, word processing and email. Hard drive is not fast enough, but the computer works OK for her. I think she would be more than happy to get a new computer for $199.

    30. Re:Joe ServicePack can buy WindowsXP by shaitand · · Score: 1

      And there is absolutely nothing wrong with that, she should hire a professional to come in and setup her word processor and install her system for her (or buy one already built by professionals such as this lindows pc).

      My problem with windows (aside from being slow, unstable, insecure, and generally unfit for advanced use) is that it attempts to make administration tasks user friendly... administration is not something that should be done by someone who has trouble with the simple CLI or a window with ALL the relevant settings.

      If you need a wizard you have no business administrating a computer because you don't know enough about the system to understand the impact of the task you are about to perform.

    31. Re:Joe ServicePack can buy WindowsXP by cmacb · · Score: 1

      Everyone on this thread seems to be missing the obvious. There is a vast gulf of difference between Windows and it's targeted user base and the currently typical Linux user. You can all argue 'till the cows come home about who is better or who is right, but the fact is that gulf over which you are arguing will get filled, not "decided".

      The true success of Linux (which will, in some pure form, always be for the educated technologist) is that it will be adapted by the Red Hats, Suses and Lindows style companies into something more easily approached by "Joe Servicepack".

      Unlike Windows, the open source approach gives almost infinite variability in what gets presented to the user. Microsoft's response to this (if they manage to make one) will probably be some quite different forms for Windows as well. You might even say that the Xbox is the first of these experiments, the Notepad version yet another. (Failed before they hit the stores IHMO).

      I can imagine Microsoft ultimately failing and becoming the Salon.com of the software business. I can also imagine them achieving some partial success where they establish some steady-state rivalry with the Open Source alternatives. But I can't imagine them putting Open Source "out of business".

      Even the geekiest of us has the need to be able to quickly install an operating system and have the system productive in short order. That drives such packaging as Knoppix to continue to raise the bar for everyone else. Those advances in Linux are happening whether "Joe Servicepack", or Bill Gates for that matter see them coming or not. While a greater acceptance by these people might speed the process along, the current rate of growth for Linux is sustainable, and in fact, most likely unstoppable.

    32. Re:Joe ServicePack can buy WindowsXP by Arandir · · Score: 1

      But the people asking the questions aren't saying "I've read the manual and I still can't figure it out." I have absolutely no problem with questions like that. But instead too many users don't want to read the documentation, they want you to be their personal unpaid system adminstrator.

      Why read the manual when it's so much easier to post a question? Why learn to tie your shoes when your mom will do it for you all the way until you're thirty?

      Can you imagine someone going to a classic automobile show, then complaining because Model T enthusiasts were elitist assholes because they told him to read the f*cking manual when he asked them "how do I change the oil?" NOBODY asks such questions as classic car shows, because no one is ballsy enough to embarrass themselves that way. But when you ask a question that is answered in the FAQ, Handbook, has 5,000 entries in a Google search, and was answered in the very same list twice this week, you're just asking to be slapped.

      All I'm saying is to at least ATTEMPT to read the manual.

      --
      A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
    33. Re:Joe ServicePack can buy WindowsXP by rsheridan6 · · Score: 1
      But a normal user would not install their own OS, they would use the one that came with the machine. Presumably that would eliminate about half of your problems. Also, as a Debian user, I can get essentially anything I want with an "apt-get install", eliminating,the other half (except your scanner problem). (Graphical tools exist for those who are afraid of the command line). Maybe this says more about the worthiness of Red Hat 8.0 than anything else (disclaimer - I've never used it myself). I, myself, had a similar experience with Red Hat based Mandrake 9 and I nearly went back to Windows too, but now I can see it was the distro that was lacking.

      If you're interested, give Knoppix a try. Since you don't have to install it to your hard drive to give it a try, you really don't waste much effort if it's not to your liking. It was the only distro I tried that actually configured my hardware properly (All I had to do was run sndconfig and a 2 GUI configuration tools which were in the KDE menu to get everything to work. This is after spending days struggling unsuccessfully with Mandrake and Slackware to play an MP3 or print a document). It's amazing that some lone guy in Germany wrote a configuration utility that (for me anyway) was far superior to what these companies can produce.

      --
      Don't drop the soap, Tommy!
  36. Just bought the $200 Wal-Mart machine by EisPick · · Score: 5, Informative
    I've had it for a few days now. A few reactions:
    • Only real disappointment is the lack of an AGP slot. You're stuck with the onboard video.
    • Wal-Mart promised a 10 GB hard drive, but it shipped with a 20 GB.
    • I got a no-OS box and installed Red Hat 9, so I can't speak about Lindows. But I can say RH9 installed easily with no driver problems.
    • 128 MB of RAM just isn't enough for RH9, X-Windows and a few apps. I spent $25 for another 128 MB (it takes PC133).
    • The Post article said shipping costs $80. I'm guessing that's for overnight. I paid $25 for UPS ground. So my total out-of-pocket was $200 + $25 shipping + $25 RAM for a decent machine that's faster than the Win98 machine it's sitting next to (that cost $800 when I bought it a few years ago).
    • The fan is a little louder than I'd like, but that's not surprising for a Duron-powered machine. But it's maybe 1.25 x as loud as your average PC, so it's not horrible.
    1. Re:Just bought the $200 Wal-Mart machine by pmz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      # The Post article said shipping costs $80. I'm guessing that's for overnight. I paid $25 for UPS ground.

      Between the misreported shipping price and assuming the one PC was slow due to the size of that 3GB drive, the review is irresponsible and probably done by a journalist operating at the boundaries of their experience.

      Reviews that misreport information are worse than useless, because uninformed readers are hungry for information to make decisions. In this case, unfortunately, a retraction is too late--the damage is already done for many readers.

    2. Re:Just bought the $200 Wal-Mart machine by MsGeek · · Score: 1

      * Only real disappointment is the lack of an AGP slot. You're stuck with the onboard video.

      You can put a PCI video card (suggestion: GeForce 4 MX 64MB PCI) in the first PCI slot and kill onboard Vampire Video.

      * Wal-Mart promised a 10 GB hard drive, but it shipped with a 20 GB.

      The Cajuns call that Lagniappe...a little something extra thrown in your bag, gratis.

      * I got a no-OS box and installed Red Hat 9, so I can't speak about Lindows. But I can say RH9 installed easily with no driver problems.

      Mandrake 9.1 would even do better, unless you really, really love GNOME. In which case RH9 will be just fine.

      * 128 MB of RAM just isn't enough for RH9, X-Windows and a few apps. I spent $25 for another 128 MB (it takes PC133).

      Good idea. I'd say give it even more RAM than that. It's dirt cheap now...

      * The fan is a little louder than I'd like, but that's not surprising for a Duron-powered machine. But it's maybe 1.25 x as loud as your average PC, so it's not horrible.

      Hell, if you can't hear the fans you might not be getting the cooling you need. I'm fine with a loud computer, actually.

      --
      Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
    3. Re:Just bought the $200 Wal-Mart machine by Carrot007 · · Score: 1

      > Only real disappointment is the lack of an AGP slot. You're stuck with the onboard video.

      Last time I looked PCI gfx cards were still available ;-)

      --
      +----------------- | What is the question!
    4. Re:Just bought the $200 Wal-Mart machine by jandrese · · Score: 1
      Wal-Mart promised a 10 GB hard drive, but it shipped with a 20 GB.
      Those Bastards!
      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    5. Re:Just bought the $200 Wal-Mart machine by evilviper · · Score: 1
      So my total out-of-pocket was $200 + $25 shipping + $25 RAM for a decent machine

      So you live in a state where you don't pay tax? Add another ~$20 to that price for anyone living in CA. These things would be much cheaper if you could go pick them up in-store... Since you have to pay shipping anyhow, I'd rather get a custom system with more even cheaper from maincomp and not have to pay tax (unless you are in NY).
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  37. Re:What the crap?! (OT) by GauteL · · Score: 1

    You may not be cache the page, but Slashdot certainly is doing it.

    Since most visits is probably just viewing the main page, it makes sense to make this a static page that is updated regularily instead of making it purely dynamic. This saves Slashdot SQL-queries and makes the site run more smoothly.

  38. Happy with our 4... by alexhmit01 · · Score: 4, Informative

    We set 4 of them up for junior employees... They happily chug away with Mandrake on them. Lindows was kind of neat, but we wanted machines that would listen to our LDAP server (running OS X). We just mount the OS X Users share point via NFS and away they go. Each machine has Mozilla on it plus an email application, and they are useful for our web researchers.

    They don't have the maintenance headache (and cost) of a Windows machine, and are cheaper than the eMacs that we otherwise use for low end computing.

    Alex

  39. Re:What the crap?! (OT) by BorgCopyeditor · · Score: 3, Funny
    The panakeia / panacea error is not, technically speaking, a typo. It is a language error: panakeia is the Greek spelling of the Greek word, panacea the Latin transliteration.

    It may not be a typo, but having two spellings of the same word definitely isn't oikonomical.

    --
    Shop as usual. And avoid panic buying.
  40. Re:What the crap?! (OT) by SirTwitchALot · · Score: 1

    That Makes sense! Thanks, I owe you my sanity.

    --
    Go away, or I will replace you with a very small shell script.
  41. Re:Rather Biased Sig there... by nurb432 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    *sigh*

    A militia is composed of private citizens. I am a private citizen. Regardless of any future or current intent, the freedom is extended to the citizens and is non-revocable. End of story.

    You can read my journal if you want more details.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  42. Re:Rather Biased Sig there... by rot26 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    "you must have a car in case granny needs to go to the doctor, therefor you have the right to own a car".

    This doesn't mean that you can't own a car unless granny is sick; it means that you have the right (some granny-lovers out there might even say OBLIGATION) to own a car, just in case granny gets sick on day and needs to go to the doctor.

    Common sense, in your case, obviously ain't common. Get back on the short yellow bus to canada, and stay there.

    --



    To ensure perfect aim, shoot first and call whatever you hit the target
  43. No real surprises here by Winterblink · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Just what I expected. The review barely qualifies as such, but its overview covers what most suspect -- that these are low power machines built for low power work. That being said, I think the concept is fantastic. For the starving students out there this can be an utterly cheap solution for having a PC to type stuff up on. This would also be good for having "dumb terminals" for other rooms around the house.

    --
    "I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar."
    -Hoban Washburn
  44. No Quake3? by BenjyD · · Score: 3, Insightful

    computers run on AMD Duron 1.0- or 1.1GHz processors,...The machines aren't fast enough to do intensive work like... playing Quake III,

    So I guess I was just imagining it when I played Quake3 on my Celeron-533? Even if it's got a crappy graphics card, a Geforce2MX would be plenty good enough and costs like $30 or something. Finally, cheap computers with "good enough" performance.

    1. Re:No Quake3? by garcia · · Score: 1

      considering that when I upgraded to a newer system SEVERAL years ago to play Quake3 (dual 400mhz Celerons, 128mb RAM (still have this), and a Voodoo3 w/16mb of RAM) and it worked just fine what would stop it from working just fine now?

      As a side note, I am still using that same system with the SAME configuration running WindowsXP *JUST FINE*. It has only recently started seeming slower because I was just upgraded to a 2.66ghz w/1024mb of RAM at work.

      Give me a break.

    2. Re:No Quake3? by damiam · · Score: 1

      The computers as shipped don't have a GF2MX, they have some shitty unaccelerated onboard video. I highyly doubt you can render Quake III in software on a 1Ghz Duron.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    3. Re:No Quake3? by BenjyD · · Score: 1

      The computers as shipped don't have a monitor either, which would make playing Quake3 even harder.

    4. Re:No Quake3? by damiam · · Score: 1

      Quite true. However, most people will know to get a monitor and plug it in. Very few people will know to order a PCI video card (since these don't have AGP), take apart the computer and install it, configure X with the proper DRI drivers, and install Quake3 on Linux.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
  45. call to arms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Lindows reviews? Somehow this just seems counter-productive. The very name "Lindows" just tells you we don't really want ANYTHING to do with it. Hence, it will never catch on. I think nearly all us folks who actually READ slashdot's articles are well aware of how crappy Lindows boxen tend to be. I mean, when is the last time you saw an OEM or retail computer vendor advertising an uber-box with GNU/Linux? They only want to sell the crappy machines with Lindows (or any other ~linux)... Great way to leverage your product, guys! Now all the consumers will only know lindows is similar to windows in the important ways: It's clunky, it's slow, it's bloated, it's overpriced (don't even go there), and it's just a vehicle to serve you more ads, more spam, and more junkware. If we wanted the features Lindows offers, we'd burn a copy of win98 and still be able to play games.

    When the big 5 OEMs start putting out SuSe and RH boxen on their big advert campaigns, we may see progress. You want linux (or whatever your favorite free OS happens to be) to become more popular? How about all us geeks and techs and admins start encouraging folks to use *NIX instead of obfuscating the issue? When we all help our MOTHERS and SISTERS, and our FATHERS and BROTHERS and FRIENDS learn to use Linux without acting like it's some kind of obscure and bizarre cult for geeks... perhaps then we'll see a shift from the insane strongarm tactics of M$ and their cronies.

    So go convince a relative or friend to switch over to linux... do it one at a time so you don't get swamped with "support" calls. DO YOUR PART! We'll never get everyone to migrate all at once. They may be fed up with M$, too, but it's all they know. If you slacker geeks here on the /. honestly want to get rid of the M$ pigopoly, shouldn't you be encouraging people to use something else? PUT YOUR D4MN MONEY WHERE YOUR MOUTH IS! Do you honestly think this is going to happen on it's own? An OS model this free and powerful will NEVER catch on as long as there's no money to be made by selling it.

    ok, it was a nice thought though, wasn't it?

  46. Slashdotters, stop complaining! by thedbp · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So far a lot of the comments have been of the following types:

    1. Hey, that's a really shitty review.

    2. What great/terrible hardware for $199.

    3. Lindows is/isn't a good choice for home usage.

    I think ya'll are missing the big picture - the fact that a Linux based PC even got reviewed in such a mainstream news source! Its not posted to Slashdot because it is a complete technical review, nor to let all you l33t fuckers know about the crazy good hardware inside to make your little coder jaws go slack in awe. It got posted to slashdot because, holy shit, its a review of a Linux-based PC in a very prominent online news source that the majority of readers who visit have probably never laid eyes on Linux before. Its called EXPOSURE (and not the bad, get registered to a sex offender database type, either.)

    Especially in the face of all the FUD surrounding Linux cuz of those SCO bastards, its really nice to see an average Joe type news source with an average Joe type reviewer gving space and consideration to a rather new, highly feared and doubted, but otherwise relatively UNKNOWN (to most people, not geeks) solution to the problem of a new PC costing too much money.

    And if mom and dad or grandma and grandpa can send email, surf the web, use their digital camera, and play some Sims, what the hell are they missing? When was the last time your grandma bragged about her frag rate? That doesn't count if your grandma is Italian and runs hits for the mob.

    Anyway, my 2Â.

    1. Re:Slashdotters, stop complaining! by labratuk · · Score: 1

      (and not the bad, get registered to a sex offender database type, either.)

      Oh, shit. That's bad this week?

      Fuck...

      --
      Malike Bamiyi wanted my assistance.
  47. Lindows is for anybody by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Most of the people out there bought a PC b/c they thought they needed one. We could be surfing the internet on a 3.7GHZ intel with HyperThreading, but why?

    A Lindows PC is for the average consumer. They need something to type and print documents with, view digital pictures and print them, surf the web, etc. It's something that most consumers thought it was; an appliance.

    Average /. sees a computer, like a stock machine, begging to be customized and scrutinized. Last thing they see it as is an appliance.

    The Lindows OS is just an affordable solution. Most consumers are probably wondering why Window PCs costs as much as it does, when all they want to do is are basic functions.

    This is a machine you'd plop in front of your folks and friends who want to read their email and check out last night's baseball highlights without having to pay so much for options they've never heard of and will probably never use.

    I don't work for Lindows or any of the computer distributors mentioned above. I own a PC with windows, and a PC with slackware.

  48. Re:What the crap?! (OT) by aug24 · · Score: 1
    It's prolly the standard server farm effect, like the variable numbers for result from Google searches. Give it a while and it'll propogate over, whether manually or not.

    J.

    --
    You're only jealous cos the little penguins are talking to me.
  49. Walmart cheap-ies are pretty nifty... by Whispers_in_the_dark · · Score: 4, Interesting

    For $200 plus another $80 in parts we recently purchased 10 machines that we are using for 20 users (via RedHat 9 and the multiple XFree86 hack). They are working quite well for data entry via the internet and at under $150/seat (purchased more RAM and a video card) they're quite a bargain if you ask me.

    1. Re:Walmart cheap-ies are pretty nifty... by pmz · · Score: 2, Interesting

      For $200 plus another $80 in parts we recently purchased 10 machines...

      If the Lindows PCs were used as X Terminals or used NFS for all read-write filesystems, these $199 PCs would be literally disposable office desktops. Just buy a couple spares for less than $500 and trash the ones that break. Seriously, these PCs are cheaper than any hourly support costs I can imagine (time == money).

    2. Re:Walmart cheap-ies are pretty nifty... by evilviper · · Score: 1

      I really don't think so... First off, it's using SDRAM, so the just slightly more expensive DDR would be a big performance boost. The hard drives are 5400RPM (which might be okay in some cases, but I know most people want bigger and faster drives).

      The complaints about the video cards are very accurate, as they are pieces of junk as well.

      Personally, I ordered a couple, and ending up returning them, leaving me about $50 poorer for shipping&handling. What a waste it was.

      Additionally, you don't realize how expensive they are. With tax and shipping, the price of the computers goes up 50%.

      I'm thinking of getting a system from maincomp because you can get something comparable to the $200 systems for less than $200, or you can customize it, and spend something like $20 more to get a system with much faster processor, more memory, name brand parts, etc. There is a shipping and handling fee to go along with it, but if you live anywhere other than NY, you don't have to pay tax, so it's even cheaper there.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    3. Re:Walmart cheap-ies are pretty nifty... by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

      via RedHat 9 and the multiple XFree86 hack

      How does that work? This approach? Or is there a better way to attach individual USB keyboards to separate X servers?

    4. Re:Walmart cheap-ies are pretty nifty... by Whispers_in_the_dark · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's the one I used. It worked out okay but I did have to do some magic to make sure that logouts worked (I wanted a specialized login manager for other reasons anyway).

  50. Re:Rather Biased Sig there... by aug24 · · Score: 1
    I just wanted to see which you were: a gun nut or a member of a well-ordered militia. If you have no intention of ever forming a militia, then you're just owning guns cos you like guns. You are within the letter, not the spirit, of the constitution if you will.

    Anyway, it's OT (but I was bored) and quoting half-sentences of the constitution out of context doesn't do the pro-gun lobby any favours.

    J.

    --
    You're only jealous cos the little penguins are talking to me.
  51. True, but it makes sense for the audience. by Thag · · Score: 1

    Grandma, or Joe Sixpack, aren't going to change out the OS, or even apply service packs. For that audience, it makes sense to review hardware and software as a single unit.

    And they did mention that they could run games on the thing, which means that Lindows was working.

    Jon Acheson

    --
    All opinions expressed herein are my own, and not those of my employers, who are appalled.
  52. Consumer Reports also reviewed the Wal-mart PC by willutah · · Score: 5, Interesting

    A short and free review by Consumer Reports can be summed up by the quote: We weren't impressed
    Although you can argue that these PCs are sufficient for most tasks, the fact that they are being sold at Wal-mart opens them up to criticism like this because, really, are wal-mart customers going to know the difference between buying a Windows PC and a Lindows PC? I would buy one of these as a techie, but I wouldn't recommend it to most folks that shop for electronics at Wal-mart.

    1. Re:Consumer Reports also reviewed the Wal-mart PC by thedbp · · Score: 1

      I'll say this: no Wal-Mart patrons probably won't know the difference between Lindows and Windows.

      But, they do know the difference between store-brand toilet tissue and Charmin. They know the difference in quality between the Charmin and the store brand. Oh, sure the store brand might have a swank version, but its still cheaper and your ass (and your wallet) will notice.

      I don't think anyone with the capacity to make it to Wal Mart in the first place to buy a computer will think for a second that the $200 machine they are buying is going to favorably compare to a $600+ machine.

      Will they know quite what to expect? No. But they know its something different just because it would have to be to be so inexpensive.

  53. One thing I'd like to see: CD-RW for backup. by Thag · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you're making a system for Grandma, it would be better if it had a CD-RW drive instead of a regular CD drive. That way you easily back the system up for Grandma when you come to visit.

    I did that for my parent's P133 system just this past weekend with the drive we got my Dad for Father's Day.

    Jon Acheson

    --
    All opinions expressed herein are my own, and not those of my employers, who are appalled.
    1. Re:One thing I'd like to see: CD-RW for backup. by pmz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you're making a system for Grandma, it would be better if it had a CD-RW drive instead of a regular CD drive. That way you easily back the system up for Grandma when you come to visit.

      Now that CD-RW drives are less than $25 (usually after a rebate), upgrading the Lindows PCs would be very affordable. However, if Lindows does not have "drag-n-drop" type support for burning CDs, a Grandma-ized front-end to mkisofs and cdrecord might be needed.

  54. Todays Society ( way OT ) by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    In today's society, one does not admit in public any ties to the militia, past, future or present.... It only gets you investigated by the 'homeland security' department.

    Though I don't think it was out of context, it is the letter of the constitution.. I have the right, even if its just 'training' for the future militia that will form when the citizens are fed up with being mis-treated by its government.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:Todays Society ( way OT ) by aug24 · · Score: 1
      In today's society, one does not admit in public any ties to the militia, past, future or present.... It only gets you investigated by the 'homeland security' department.

      This is presumably cos most recent militias haven't really been militias in the old sense, but gun nuts with paranoia.

      Though I don't think it was out of context, it is the letter of the constitution...

      It is. However, I personally don't think the writers of the constitution would have written it that way if they'd know the huge reduction in the cost of guns that would occur, or if they'd known about the huge number of deaths by gun that we see today in America.

      Also: my apologies for 'poking you with a stick' a couple of posts ago. I was bored and irritated with what I'm doing and let my worst argument-picking nature get the better of me.

      J.

      --
      You're only jealous cos the little penguins are talking to me.
  55. Why? by NetJunkie · · Score: 1

    You think most people have a domain controller at home? The main difference Pro has over Home is joining a domain. It's all XP underneath.

  56. write your own review. specs below! by leuk_he · · Score: 3, Informative

    Only the novapcs mentions it is using a sis 730 mobo,

    the wallmart pc uses probably a Integrated TRIDENT BLADE 2D/3D graphics video.

    the wintermart probably uses a Integrated S3 Savage 4 video up to 32 mb ram.

    Now tell me why cannot play quake 3 on either of these? The reviewer should have tried it! OK QII with 300 fps in 1600x1200FSAA is not possible but 25 FPS in 640x480 should work. (Is there a port for QIII?)
    (Warning lots of copy and paste work below.)
    tiger direct

    Premium Wintergreen Complete Kitâ"AMD Duron 1.0GHz, 128MB SDRAM Memory, 10GB Hard Drive and More!

    This system has all the extras you are looking orâ"a fast AMD Duron 1.0GHz processor, onboard premium video, crystal-clear integrated sound, 10GB hard drive, high-speed CD-ROM drive, floppy drive, 10/100 Ethernet and a 56K modem. Get your barebone kit today and build your dream computer for a fraction of the retail price!

    * AMD® Duronâ 1.0GHz Processor Learn More
    * 128MB PC133 SDRAM Memory Learn More
    * 10GB Hard Drive
    * 56x CD-ROM Drive
    * 3.5" (1.44MB) Floppy Disk Drive
    * 56K Modem
    * Onboard Premium Audio
    * Premium Integrated Video
    * PS/2 Keyboard/Mouse
    * Monitor Sold Separately

    wallmart
    icrotel SYSMAR417 PC With Lycoris OS & AMD Duron 1.1GHz

    $199.98

    Availability: Usually takes 2 to 7 business days to process before shipping.
    Shipping Cost: To see the shipping cost for this item, add it to your cart.

    128 MB memory
    10 GB hard drive
    CD-ROM drive
    Integrated 10/100 Ethernet connection
    Lycoris Desktop/LX operating system (Linux-based)
    Modem and floppy disk drive are not included

    This item is currently available online only.

    Key Features and Description

    Note: Linux operating systems may not be compatible with some dial-up Internet services, such as AOL or Wal-Mart Connect. Microtel can only guarantee Linux-based OS compatibility with factory-installed components. Microtel will not be responsible for the installation and operation of third-party hardware or software used with its computers that have these operating systems.

    The Linux-based operating system in these PCs is not compatible with any Microsoft Windows programs, however, it is great for basic operations such as email, Web browsing and instant messaging and can be easily upgraded for compatibility with Microsoft Office documents that have .doc, xls. or .ppt suffixes.

    * AMD Duron 1.1 GHz processor with 3DNow! technology
    * 200 MHz frontside bus
    * 128 MB SDRAM, expandable to 1 GB
    * 133 MHz memory speed
    * 10 GB Ultra-ATA 100 hard drive, 5400 rpm (total accessible capacity varies depending on operating environment)
    * 52x CD-ROM drive
    * Integrated video with up to 8 MB shared video memory
    * Integrated AC '97 audio
    * Integrated 10/100 Ethernet connection
    * Mid ATX tower case (17.5"D x 7.5"W x 15"H)
    * Available external drive bays: two 5.25-inch, one 3.5-inch internal
    * 2 available PCI slots
    * Serial port
    * Parallel port
    * Two USB 1.1 ports
    * 104-key keyboard
    * 2-button mouse with wheel
    * Audio port (line-in, line-out, mic-in)
    * Stereo speakers
    * 1-year warranty, return to manufacturer

    Software includes:

    * GIMP digital image editor
    * Word processor, spreadsheet, presentation maker, addressbook, calendar
    * Contact manager and time management
    * Digikam digital camera software supporting over 162 digital cameras
    * Mozilla Web browser and email client
    * XMMS MP3, Ogg Vorbis, WA

    1. Re:write your own review. specs below! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's my review:

      These computers suck.

    2. Re:write your own review. specs below! by MrResistor · · Score: 1

      Id actually does developement on *nix, so all their games are ported.

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
    3. Re:write your own review. specs below! by leuk_he · · Score: 1

      But does it work, The quality of the linux opengl drivers for these integrated video cards is questionable.

    4. Re:write your own review. specs below! by Tombstone-f · · Score: 1

      Works fine.

      Haven't tested the framerates recently but it's very smooth at 1024X768 on my T-bird 900 with a Geforce2 GTS and Mandrake 9.1.

    5. Re:write your own review. specs below! by MrResistor · · Score: 1

      If there's a 3d driver for the chipset I don't see why it wouldn't. It's been a while, but I remember all the ID games I've played having a software rendering option, though, so I'm not sure it matters that much.

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
  57. Conspiracy! by arvindn · · Score: 4, Informative
    The submitter is Eugenia Loli-Queru, who regularly writes "reviews" on OSnews.com that the /. crowd usually considers to be flamebait.

    Just mentioning what I happened to notice. Conclusions, if any, are left to the reader.

  58. Couldn't find the Walmart Lindows PC for $199 by woogieoogieboogie · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Walmart had a Lycoris OS pc for. $199 .

    Some of the Microtel systems come with an MSI 6390 board . The MSI Metis barebones ( $138 at Newegg also uses this board and I have used these boards extensively due to their tight integration, small form factor, high degree of reliability and stability.

    --
    ... Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just Powers from the Consent of the Governed...
  59. What is the graphix chip? by The+Lord+of+Java+II · · Score: 1

    I read somewhere that these have a SiS630 chipset. I have this chip and it doesn't load 3D in Linux. So how come they run some games?

    1. Re:What is the graphix chip? by Sp0r · · Score: 1

      You know, some games in the world are not 3D. Like pacman or fortune.

      --
      I am Sp0r, Scourge of the Cosmos!
    2. Re:What is the graphix chip? by The+Lord+of+Java+II · · Score: 1

      I know! But isn't the Sims 3D? The article mentions the Sims runs on these PCs.

    3. Re:What is the graphix chip? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Although The Sims may appear to be 3D, it doesn't make use of OpenGL (or Direct3D in Windows) so it doesn't require DRM in Linux.

  60. You troll! by leuk_he · · Score: 1

    Lindows is not targeted at the average /.er so donÂt start bashing M$.

    Option 1:
    -You recommend this 200$ lindows PC and replace it with tyour corparate key XP
    Option 2:
    -You let them have their lindows PC since it works great in browsing porn, as long as they do not bother you .
    Option 3: (Since 1: you live in the US and want to be legal, and 2 the buyer is a nice female )
    -You install debian on their PC and dedicate your life in supporting them.

  61. Greek - English by easter1916 · · Score: 1

    Eugenia, in English the word is "panacea".

  62. $80 Shipping?? by jetkust · · Score: 1

    Tiger Direct charged $40 and Wal-Mart $80 for shipping

    What? I ordered an 1ghz p4 emachine several months ago for $299 at overstock.com, and the shipping was $3.95. And it came with Windows XP preinstalled.

    1. Re:$80 Shipping?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      aside from the fact that the slowest p4 was the 1.4, how can you back this up?

      that maybe an athlon you have?

  63. exactly. by gimpboy · · Score: 1

    at work i'm using an amd k7 700 + voodoo 3 and at home i have a dual celron 400 + tnt1. both of these machines work fine for pretty much everything i do. one of these 200 machines with a new videocard would suit most of my needs. granted i dont really play any games, but for programming, browsing the web, editing images, watching movies, etc. these would be more that enough.

    --
    -- john
  64. Anyone used these as file-servers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Has anyone used them as Samba-servers for a small office? Maybe throw in a 100 gig disk, turn it on and forget about it?

    How did it fare?

    Thanks.

  65. In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... USA Today reviewed 9492 promotional giveaway calculators, concluding that while they were mere pieces of technological crap not even worth MY two cents, each one of them could have replaced a supercomputer in the 50's!

    The article goes on to quote Joe Yodel, Bumfuck, Kansas, as saying: "Whoa, I own a supercomputer! Imagine a beowulf cluster of these!"

  66. Minor point... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Especially in the face of all the FUD surrounding Linux cuz of those SCO bastards, its really nice to see an average Joe type news source...

    Average Joe knows nothing of SCOÂs FUD.
  67. Come on, come on... by jtheory · · Score: 1

    So, wait, is Slashdot in Greek or English again?

    Any second now someone's going to post:
    "Well, it's all Greek to me".

    It's gotta happen. I've seen this all before.

    Oh, wait. Damn; it was me.
    Then I apologize.

    --
    There are only 10 types of people: those who understand decimal, those who don't, and, uh, 8 other types I forget.
    1. Re:Come on, come on... by unitron · · Score: 1
      "Well, it's all Greek to me".

      I thought Slashdot was supposed to be all Geek. :-)

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  68. Not everyone can be a geek by MyRuger · · Score: 1

    I spent yesterday afternoon scrounging through my spare computer parts box trying to get enough peices together to build my sister a new machine for her new apartment. She has no money with moving/baby costs, so any machine would do. I ended up putting together a PIII 700, 256MB RAM. cheap everything else machine running Red Hat.

    The point is that most /.ers could find enough parts to build a machine like that in their closet right now, but your average person can't.

    If you want to play games you really need to build your own PC these days, so lets exculde the gamers. The hard core computation people all have nice goverment grants to buy fast clusters now, so we can exclude them. So... What else is left... Surfing the web and email, with the occasional office appliction thrown in. Why pay $1500 for that. In fact I belive that most people barely push their CPU's at all in their common, day to day computer operations, so why should they waste their money on an uber powerful computer.

    While I'm sure that my above list of high end machine needs is incomplete (please don't mod me down as flamebait, I'm just making apoint), The point is that the casual gamer can buy an Xbox for $300, why can't the casual web surfer buy a computer for $300.

  69. three days ago.. by gimpboy · · Score: 1

    i was at a friends house working on his computer. i was playing with one of those little keychain usb drive things. i stuck it into the port on his xp box and a drive appeared in the "my computer" thing. i didnt have to add any drivers or anything. the real kicker here is that sure you might have to install drivers in windows but at least they exist. you dont even have such assurances in linux.

    dont get me wrong, i use linux exclusively. so when i purchase new hardware, i know it works with linux before i buy it.

    windows affords users the luxury of not having to go through that. sure this is a direct result of their monopoly on the desktop, but the average user doesnt care about that. they want to be able to buy a cheap ass webcam and have it work. while they may have to stick in a driver disk in windows, there is a good chance there is no support in linux.

    --
    -- john
    1. Re:three days ago.. by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

      i was playing with one of those little keychain usb drive things.

      Those drives work just fine with all recent Linux distributions. Stick one into a RedHat9 machine, for example, and a window with the drive contents pops onto your screen automatically.

      they want to be able to buy a cheap ass webcam and have it work

      It's true that camera vendors often avoid using standard interfaces for no good reason except to be different. However, I've purchased webcams for as little as $9 (still in the original packaging) and had them work in Linux just fine.

    2. Re:three days ago.. by jrumney · · Score: 1

      There's a good chance that that keychain usb drive used the usb-storage protocol. In that case it should work out of the box on any modern OS (though with previous versions of Windows, I've had to install drivers to use usb-storage devices, while Linux has had usb-storage built-in for as long as it's had USB support).

  70. What Lindows needs to contribute to Linux by David+Gerard · · Score: 1
    Hardware drivers. USB drivers. gphoto2 support for the camera of the week. All the little candy fit-and-finish stuff.

    The difference between Windows and Unix is: Windows comes with everything out of the box, but doesn't work after that; Unix comes with nothing out of the box, but once you get stuff working it stays working.

    Lindows needs to work on the tons of driver candy, and encourage manufacturers to do so.

    --
    http://rocknerd.co.uk
  71. Heres a direct quote: by CyberBill · · Score: 1

    "The machine is agonizingly slow because of its tiny 3GB drive"

    Proving that whoever wrote it, is retarded. The rest of the article goes about the same way, saying "Oh, this computer has 3 PCI slots, instead of the other computer that has 2PCI and 1AGP." Without pointing out how important having an AGP slot is, so you can put a decent graphics card in it.

    -Bill

    --
    -Bill
  72. Availability of cheap Linux PCs in Europe by edxwelch · · Score: 1

    If you look at the Lindows website, you will see that the only places that they have an agreement with OEMs are in USA, Canada and Israel. Although Linux PCs are available in Europe, you won't find a 200 Euro model available. Invariable the best value (price/performance) on the market comes with Windows XP.

  73. Just browsed the Dell refurb site... by mbourgon · · Score: 1

    for reference's sake. We know what the $200 computers have, WRT drives, CPU, etc. Let's see what Dell offers.

    (these are the cheapest Dimension/Optiplex computers I could find right now.)
    $360 - Dimension 2350. P4-2200, 30g 7200rpm, 128mb, 48x, Microtower, Windows XP Home.

    $360 - Optiplex SX260. Celeron 1800, 20g 5400rpm, 128mb, 24x, Ultrasmall Form Factor, Windows XP Home.

    Yes, there are alternatives to the $200 machines. Just expect them to cost more.

    --
    "Sometimes a woman is a kind of religion, she can save your soul & set you free from all your sins" - Bad Examples
  74. What "Low power"? by Animats · · Score: 1
    These are gigahertz machines with an eighth of a gigabyte of ram and gigabytes of hard drive. How much compute power does an entry-level user need?

    If you want to run games, get a game console.

  75. Re:What the crap?! (OT) by kalidasa · · Score: 1

    It may not be a typo, but having two spellings of the same word definitely isn't oikonomical.

    Somebody, please, mod quoted parent up funny. Just look up the word "economics" in a dicitonary and look at the etymology if you don't get the joke.

  76. Work View by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

    "So what? most people don't have brand new stuff and get their jobs done just fine.

    In business 99% of the computers are idle, waiting for the user to do something. Even in home life ( games aside ), the computer is NOT being taxed.. its mostly just a expensive heat generating device"

    I couldn't agree more. I, like my colleagues and 2 service centres of over 200 staff are currently using Windows 95 on Pentium 166Mhz machines. I have 64Mb memory and a 4gig hard drive. OK these machines are a horror to use on a day to day basis - at least 2 crashes a day, but they do run everything I need to be productive and they do allow me to get my work done, eventually.

    If my company had been concerned about always getting the latest and greatest and toeing the upgrade line we would no doubt have wasted an awful lot of money on new hardware & software. It's also interesting to note we are a large global consultancy who always recommed that our clients absoloutley need the latest flat screen monitors and 2Ghz processors to make their powerpoint presentations on ;-)
  77. So what about bottom of the barrell notebooks? by kotj.mf · · Score: 1
    I could easily see buying one of the desktops to replace my girlfriend's Celeron 450 system. She just browses the web and plays Mah Jong.

    I'm looking for an under-$1000, four or five pound notebook with relatively decent specs to run SuSE on. The Lindows Moblie PC is out... I don't want no steenking Via. I leaning toward a 12" iBook, but then I stumbled across Averatec 3150 series. 12", Athlon Mobile 1600, 30GB, 256MB, CD-RW/DVD, 4.3 pounds, 3 USB 2.0, & PCMCIA for less than a grand, or with integrated 802.11b for just over.

    Has anybody else come across anything similar at the same price? I've still gotta haul my ass to Best Buy to play with one of the Averatecs, and it's gonna be a couple of months before I've got a thousand bucks to drop.

    --
    hang brain.
    1. Re:So what about bottom of the barrell notebooks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PC Connection has a ton of used Thinkpads for that price. Check out the T-series and X-series. They are going to be much nicer laptops than some piece-of-crap no-name laptop, too. Thinkpads last for YEARS.

      BTW, if you call PC Connection, you can usually get a better price than what is shown on their website.

    2. Re:So what about bottom of the barrell notebooks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To add to my last post, here is a Thinkpad T-series for $999. There are several others around that price range.

      We have bought thousands of dollars worth of stuff from PC Connection (corporate account) and have never had any problems. HTH.

  78. The purpose of Slashdot ... by daviddennis · · Score: 1

    is for knowledgeable technical people to converse and learn by discussing the news stories of the day.

    I would say its remit has no connection whatsoever with Joe Sixpack. Certainly Joe would be totally bewildered by 99% of what goes on here.

    I don't see anything wrong with that; Joe has his own publications and forums, and so do we.

    D

  79. Beyond stupid. by dsfox · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I just love competing with people who feel they have to decide whether their customers deserve their product. Also those who are convinced that convenience is an impossible dream.

    1. Re:Beyond stupid. by shaitand · · Score: 1

      Linux is not a product. It's a gift. You don't pay a dime to get that gift. And I certainly don't code for it to give you said gift. I code for ME not you, you are a side effect.

  80. Lindows PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Despite their scaled-back features, these computers run on AMD Duron 1.0- or 1.1GHz processors, making them speedy enough for word processing, Internet access, working with digital pictures and playing some games.

    I still own a 4.77 Mhz PC clone (circa 1984) - guess what? - I used to do word processing on it. I still could if I had to.

    What planet are these guys living on?

  81. Walmart also offers SuSE machines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not bad for the price Walmart

  82. Slightly Skimpy Review by colinduplantis · · Score: 2, Informative

    No doubt /.'ers are quite familiar with Lindows and Linux. Considering the article ran in the Washington Post, albeit online, I am a little surprised more emphasis wasn't placed on the fact that the OS was not any type of Windows product, and, if Joe/Jane Sixpack were to buy one thinking he or she could run M$ stuff on a $200 machine, he or she would likely be sorely disappointed. I am a big fan of Walmart et al making this move, but I don't expect it to be a big hit just yet with the average Redmondite.

    --
    If you love something, let it go. If it comes back to you, hump its leg.
  83. Re:What the crap?! (OT) by NisJ�rgensen · · Score: 1

    The English spelling is of course panacea

    Hmm - I always thought that was the US English spelling of pancake.

    Still I somewhat doubt that panakeia is the Greek spelling of anything ...

  84. Re:What the crap?! (OT) by 1u3hr · · Score: 1

    panakeia is the Greek spelling of the Greek word, and if you click on the submitter's link, you find that she's Greek, so this is not the standard Slashduh illiteracy, but a symptom of polyglottalism.

  85. Re:Ah, mods by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Support for Radeon and NVidia pretty much covers every decent 3D card released in the last 3 years. Linux also offers excellent 3dfx Voodoo support too, for us old timers.

    I'm gonna stick my neck out and guess that more than half the people who care about decent 3D are currently running an NVidia card - before ATI recently woke up they've ruled the roost fairly consistently since 3DFX died. Many knock NVidia for their binary only drivers, and there have been some issues in the past, but in my experience the latest version is truly excellent.

    In fact the only halfway useful 3D chipset I can think of that _might not_ be well supported is PowerVR, and in truth that would not really be a big deal. So tell us what decent 3D hardware isn't well supported under linux!

  86. Actually... by TheAwfulTruth · · Score: 1

    Considering that they typical person that buys this thing would be operating at the boundaries of their experience, the review's meta-data might be of some use.

    I don't know about "damage" over all. The Consumers Report on the Lindows PC is what is really damaging. Millions of people actually rely on them for reviews and they were "Not Impressed".

    --
    Contrary to popular belief, coding is not all free blow-jobs and beer. Those things cost MONEY!
    1. Re:Actually... by pmz · · Score: 1

      The Consumers Report on the Lindows PC is what is really damaging. Millions of people actually rely on them for reviews and they were "Not Impressed".

      This is unfortunate, because CR's product reviews are also subjective and less "scientific" than they like to claim. Most often, CR's bias lies in their choices of measurement and analysis techniques. It is also hard to guess what the reviewer's expectations were before the review began. (basically, these are the faults of all product reviews)

      However, Consumer Reports is indispensible for their large aggregate database of car and appliance reliability histories. The sample sizes, in these cases, are very large and can be assumed to be more trustworthy.

      This is why I usually rely on their periodic Automobile and Buyer's Guide issues but not their regular issues.

  87. Something runs on Lindows!!! by Photo_Nut · · Score: 2, Interesting

    All through the complaints on what they are lacking one point is missed... THEY COST $199.00! they are basically a bare-bones PC. hell add another $59.00 and you can get a low end Geforce 4 and make it scream for games.

    for $199.00 these things are great.

    and the fact they are windows free are even better.

    The specs mentioned on these PCs include a 1.1GHz CPU, 128MB of games, a 3GB "old slow laptop" HD, and you think that a GeForce 4 will make it good for games??? How many games run on Linux/Lindows? Where can I buy them? If I go into an EB, what games run on Linux?

    Being Windows free means that 99.9% of consumer software won't run on it. Having good USB support is critical to using the computer for anything with external devices. If I am Joe 6 Pack and I go to CompUSA and buy a NEW $200 digital camera, then I am screwed if the camera doesn't have Linux drivers. If I get one that's cheaper than that, I am even MORE screwed (how many geeks do you know that buy a < 1MP camera and write drivers for Linux).

    I'm not asking about do-it-yourself computer nerds with 10 years of Linux experience, I'm asking about normal people who are intimidated by what they don't understand. Most smart teenagers can wrap their head around Linux, but given the choice between Linux on a REALLY cheap PC and Windows on all their school computers and their friends computers, which do you think they're going to have a more positive experience with?

    Also, I'm sure that these PCs come with a CD-ROM, but do they come with CD-RW? How similar to Windows is the OS? When I insert a blank CD ready to burn, what happens? Can I drag and drop to manage my files? Is there a manual? Help? Support? Microsoft Windows has a "Help and Support" section built in to the start menu, and step-by-step help instructions for doing just about anything tricky for a typical PC user. Most Linux software is aimed squarely at the do-it-yourselfer-with-the-CLI.

    I'm not trying to dis the system as non-functional. I'm simply saying that for the low end computer user, it's going to be a real struggle to use when anything new comes out, and 99.9% of software that a consumer will want to run only runs on Windows. The other .1% is obscure and hard to find. $89 for Windows XP isn't unreasonable. A $150 pile of hardware will seem like a 5 year old computer when compared to a $400 computer with decent specs in today's market. Imagine what that computer will be able to do in 2-5 years.

    My best home PC is an 850MHz Athlon with 512MB RAM, 120GB HD, USB2+Firewire, a GeForce 2 card, and it runs Windows XP Pro/Office XP Pro. The hardware cost about $1000 2 years ago. That's a little more than $1 per day that I've gotten out of it. Imagine that software costs an additional $1000 for Office XP, Windows XP, and Photoshop 7. I've spend about $2 per day on this computer over the last 2 years, and over the course of the 5 year lifetime of the computer, it will be averaged to about $0.50 per day.

    The nice thing about this computer is that when Windows XP detects a new device, it either installs the driver from the Microsoft driver cache/horde somewhere, or pops up a window to help you find the driver. In my experience, I only need drivers for new, exotic devices like my $1500 Digital SLR. The other devices like my new USB2/Firewire PCI card and the CF card reader that attaches to it just work. All you see is a little balloon in the corner notify you that Windows found the driver and you can now use your device.

    I very rarely need to install the floppy or CD that came with the new hardware, but even if I did I can be confident that the CD works with my Windows computer as long as the CD says Windows (XP) somewhere on it, which all of the CDs that come with my hardware do. Many of these also supports Mac OS. I haven't purchased a single device which comes with any support for Lindows, or Linux, or BSD.

    Lindows is just not as big of

    1. Re:Something runs on Lindows!!! by shaitand · · Score: 1

      " The specs mentioned on these PCs include a 1.1GHz CPU, 128MB of games, a 3GB "old slow laptop" HD, and you think that a GeForce 4 will make it good for games??? How many games run on Linux/Lindows? Where can I buy them? If I go into an EB, what games run on Linux?"

      refer to www.transgaming.com for a nice list of windows games that run on linux. There are also a number of linux games out there (though not as many 3d high end ones, there are plenty of great 2d games) which can found and downloaded free on the web. Everything from Everquest to Warcraft III. These of course like ANY piece of software should be installed by a professional who knows what he's doing and impact on the computer. Let's not forget, end users should USE their computer, not perform administration tasks.

      "Being Windows free means that 99.9% of consumer software won't run on it. Having good USB support is critical to using the computer for anything with external devices. If I am Joe 6 Pack and I go to CompUSA and buy a NEW $200 digital camera, then I am screwed if the camera doesn't have Linux drivers. If I get one that's cheaper than that, I am even MORE screwed (how many geeks do you know that buy a 1MP camera and write drivers for Linux)."

      The average user should be paying a professional to install hardware, not being given the false impression he can do it himself than calling techsupport when he plugged the camera in before installing the software and NUKED windows ultra great usb technology.

      "Also, I'm sure that these PCs come with a CD-ROM, but do they come with CD-RW? How similar to Windows is the OS? When I insert a blank CD ready to burn, what happens? Can I drag and drop to manage my files?"

      These don't come with burners, if they did, then yes, you can drag and drop burn. It's worth mentioning though that my experience in technical support indicattes that 90% of users NEVER figure out how this works in winXP and prefer Roxio or other burning software.

      "he nice thing about this computer is that when Windows XP detects a new device, it either installs the driver from the Microsoft driver cache/horde somewhere, or pops up a window to help you find the driver. In my experience, I only need drivers for new, exotic devices like my $1500 Digital SLR. The other devices like my new USB2/Firewire PCI card and the CF card reader that attaches to it just work. All you see is a little balloon in the corner notify you that Windows found the driver and you can now use your device."

      You have to do all that? 99% of the time, I install hardware, I turn on the machine, my redhat linux system installs and sets up base configuration for the hardware on the fly without my interaction.

      Hardware hell is primarily a thing of the past in the linux world.

      " Oh, and while Linux is trying to catch up in features and ease of use and availability of Joe 6 Pack software, MS is busy making more support, establishing better relations with people, releasing service pack fixes, and collecting valuable information that they will build into Longhorn. It will probably bundle more MSR technologies and come at another sticker price of around $90 for home and $190 for pro in a few years. By then, Lindows will seem awfully painful in comparison."

      You seem confused, linux isn't trying to catch up with anything. The linux world is doing the technology right the first time. Linux beats windows on EVERY REAL advancement in technology, it has it before and the support it has for that technology is superior. The only thing linux plays catchup on is proprietary interfaces which M$ has defined. BTW, you are also confused if you think linux isn't a significant competitor... Microsoft themselves certainly consider it such and with good reason. MacOS isn't number 2 on the desktop anymore, linux is... the linux market share is growing and there is only one place to take that market share away from. Microsoft.

  88. Nova Computech - Buyer Beware by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

    I've dealt with them before.

    I ordered a GeForce 4 Ti4600 (PNY Verto) from them, and the card was defective. Within 20-30 minutes of bootup, text in console mode would be corrupted every few characters, and in X (or in Windows), there would be vertical yellow lines every few pixels. Probably a cold solder joint somewhere...

    So I first tried dealing with PNY support. Their response: Take it to the vendor for a return.

    So I try to return it to Nova. They tell me to go talk to PNY.

    It took two weeks to receive an RMA number, after which I sent back the card, demanding a refund. (I did NOT want a replacement, as at this point I wanted to end all further association with both PNY and Nova due to the horrendous customer support both of them had.)

    A month later and still no credit. It took me 4-5 calls before I reached someone with a clue, who told me that they had tried the unit and it wasn't defective, and that a replacement was out of stock. I told him, no, I didn't want a replacement, I never wanted to deal with PNY again. In the end I got ripped off for a $30 restocking fee for a defective product and a month of hassles.

    Stay away from Nova Computech. Don't know about TigerDirect, although they've had bad press here before. Walmart's return policies in-store are great, I don't know about online. I'm sad to say this, but Wally World is likely your best bet for one of these systems. (I'll be ordering one shortly - It's perfectly suited as a basic personal webserver.)

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  89. Working Link by kajoob · · Score: 1

    Here is a working link for the report on Consumer Report's site.

    --
    Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur
  90. Just Bought On - It's Slow by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1
    There is a slight problem comparing this system to your average whitebox: It's got one of those infamous "All-in-one" motherboards. The graphics card "borrows" system ram. A system compile (RAM and I/O intensive) slows down KDE (Graphics and RAM intensive) because everyone is competing for the memory bus. Ordinarily fast operations like DMA also take a major hit.

    In my application I don't give a flying foo. The system is going to live under a counter at a coffee shop as a simple firewall and terminal server.

    But, having built many computers, I have noticed that most systems the use the main ram for video ram share this problem. PS: Low-end dell's fall under this category, at least the Optiplex 150. No experience with other vendors, feel free to share.

    --
    "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
    --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
  91. Re:Ah, mods by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pretty much all the PC's in this review do not have any accelerated 3D support under Linux, with the possible limited exception of the S3 Savage 4 core in one of them.

  92. Re:Ah, mods by Doppler00 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I just installed Red Hat 9.0 and I was shocked that it didn't install the correct drivers for my NVidia video card. Sure, 2D worked okay but it didn't bother to install any 3D acceleration so I had to download drivers myself and edit X configuration files manually. The average user wouldn't be able to figure this out.

  93. Re:BUSH = RECESSION by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Duck curry... yum!

    Hope she can export more!

  94. Wow! by DohDamit · · Score: 1

    I am impressed. I bet you even make your own crack cocaine in your own bathtub. Blah.

  95. Re:BUSH = RECESSION by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I love the way right-wingers always fall back on the mistakes of the past to justify the mistakes of the present.

    I'm not a right-winger. I'm just sick and fucking tired of ignorant eurotrash ignoring reality. Europe's doing fine, huh? How many people leave europe to move to the USA every year, and how many leave the US to move to europe? Just keep repeating that everything's fine, because although it won't actually MAKE it fine, you'll be able to convince yourself. No one here cares.
    As far as fat women go...well...i wonder where the term rubenesque came from. couldn't have been europe. everyone in europe is perfectly formed and healthy, while all americans are fat. since you're the type of person who likes to make fun of others based on their appearance, i bet you'd have no problems with posting your picture, right? it's obvious you have no intelligence, but perhaps someday you'll stumble over a clue. as you're eurotrash, however, i won't count on it.

  96. Re:Ah, mods by arose · · Score: 1

    So? My Radeon 7000 is detected autmaticly by Mandrake 9.1

    --
    Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
  97. mmm by kguilber · · Score: 1

    indeed these machines are not pancakes; Eggo has upgraded their pancakes to support USB 2.0; Aunt Jemima is expected to follow suit in the next few weeks.

  98. Re:Ah, mods by shaitand · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This isn't red hat's fault, this is Nvidia's fault. Blame the card manufacturer, and be impressed by the quality of the support it did have out of the box. Remember the drivers in question have been developed without help from Nvidia who keeps the specs needed to write drivers to themselves.

  99. Re:Not reviewing Lindows, just the bare bones boxe by savetz · · Score: 1

    This was a hardware review, not a review of Lindows. The Post has already reviewed Lindows 3.0, so the editor asked me to steer away from a lingering discussion about it.

  100. Speccy? by FireBreathingDog · · Score: 1

    Forgive me if this is a dumb question, but what is a "speccy"? Is it a type of machine?

  101. Re:What the crap?! (OT) by kalidasa · · Score: 1

    Still I somewhat doubt that panakeia is the Greek spelling of anything .

    No, technically, it is a transliteration into the Latin alphabet, following modern transliteration rules, of the Greek spelling of pi-alpha-nu-alpha-kappa-epsilon-iota-alpha.

  102. Re:What the crap?! (OT) by kalidasa · · Score: 1

    and if you click on the submitter's link, you find that she's Greek, so this is not the standard Slashduh illiteracy, but a symptom of polyglottalism.

    Which, of course, was implied by my point: it is a language error; the author is writing in English, and using a Greek spelling (in the Latin alphabet).

  103. How did we ever manage... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    2 years ago, when all the PC's ran at these speeds and less?

  104. Decent $369.32 computer by tgraupmann · · Score: 1

    I decided to do price research into how much it would cost to build an equivalent machine to the one I built a year ago, today. ($369.32) compared to much more a year ago. It's not $200, but it is a beefed up system that any college student in 3D design could get by with. See the specs at: http://tgraupmann.hypermart.net and then go build one yourself.

  105. Tiger Direct: 15 GB, $229.00 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know how the 3 GB thing got started, the base system is 10 GB, and they have some nice upgrades at 229.00. One has DDR ram. 10 and 15 GB HDD's. Go look for yourself. Now, These systems can run KDE and Gimp all at once, no problem. I do it all the time using Mandrake 8, 256 MB SDRAM, and an AMD K6-2 running at 390 MHZ. All Day, till I drop, and I cannot see why Lindows can't do that too (Debian). If I had a spare 229.00, which I don't, I'd get this machine, put my HDD's in it (save time) and go to it! Save on Shipping? Where is this place anyway. Let's just drive over there and suprise them some Saturday morning, $$ in hand.

  106. Re:Ah, mods by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What are you comparing this to? You obviously haven't installed a shrinkwrap MS Windows OS recently. You do not get accelerated drivers for any video hardware from MS in their OS's. You have to go get them from the vendor and install them.

  107. Eugenia is originally from Greece by Compact+Dick · · Score: 1
    From Eugenia's website:
    So, my name is indeed Eugenia, I am 30 years old, born in Athens, Greece, but raised near a city called Preveza.
  108. No MS $$ Tax. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sure, these machines are cheap, because XP's not installed, and I have heard this referred to as the "MS Tax"
    If, and this is a big if, they come with the Lindows OS CD's, then one can put Windows 98 on it, and then
    reinstall Lindows on top of that. Probably what I would do is put the Lindows HDD in as "slave" and put my Windows 98/Mandrake/Redhat HDD in as "master" and set it all up like that. Hope to get System Commander to control it all, or would have a stack of boot disks for all the Linux installs. I have this machine I am on now set up that way.

  109. Re:Ah, mods by Hoe · · Score: 1

    errrmm actually windows dosnt ship with nvidia opengl drivers either. it amazing what people expect from linux distros sometimes.

  110. Re:Ah, mods by shaitand · · Score: 1

    That's because unlike windows, and despite bitching back, open source developers tend to implement those things they bitch about. I'm all for it, the more people bitch, the more ends up happening.

  111. Re:Ah, mods by shellbeach · · Score: 1
    AFAIK, the Nvidia drivers aren't included in linux distros because they're closed source. Instead, the default install uses the oss driver that comes with XFree86 (and which does not support 3D accel). It seems a bit silly to me, too, but there you go.

    However, having recently bought a Geforce4 card and installed WinXP, I note that Windows doesn't come with Nvidia drivers for this card either. So you can't blame linux too much :)

    (your point about having to edit XF86Config-4 is valid, though ... I would have thought Nvidia would have included a fix for that in their script (all it should take is changing "nv" to "nvidia" in the driver section))