Slashdot Mirror


Apple-Quality Intel Laptops?

arashiakari asks: "I have to buy a new laptop soon and I am having trouble settling on a brand or model except one that I cannot use. Apple's iBook laptop is beautiful, functional, lightweight, and made of high quality materials. I would buy one today except that I am a professional programmer and MUST use the same platform my compiler targets: Intel. So far each Intel-based laptop I have looked at is both grossly over-decorated (Compaq, Toshiba) and made of cheap flimsy materials (Dell), or has the combined problem of being overpriced and under-powered - with external bays for everything (Sony). IBM is expensive, but they are as close as I've found to "right" ... with Toshiba in second place. It seems like Intel-based laptops are either hot ugly tanks or oversized PDAs, there seems to be a scarcity of balanced well-thought-out and produced machines. Does the Slashdot have any suggestions?"

229 comments

  1. Emulation? by nocomment · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Will an intel emulator work? Something such as virtual pc? I know you can use the commercial product for Mac's called codewarrior that is able to compile for intel. You'd still need some kind of emulator to test it though. Has anyone else done this?

    --
    /* oops I accidentally made a comment, sorry */
    /* http://allyourbasearebelongto.us */
    1. Re:Emulation? by Meowing · · Score: 1

      Sure, Virtual PC works fine for that kind of thing. It _is_ an emulator, so don't go expecting performance miracles. Order the Mac with as much memory as it can take, you're going to be carrying a full copy of Windows in that emulatoed system.

    2. Re:Emulation? by Stigmata669 · · Score: 1

      No it won't. Have you ever used Virtual PC, even 5.0? On a $3000 Mac dual 1.42 it runs slower than my Celeron366.

      --
      Yawn.
    3. Re:Emulation? by Shishio · · Score: 3, Informative

      Well, Virtual PC is still incapable of splitting its PC tasks and using a Mac's second processor for anything more trivial than drawing the window border. It's still slower than it should be, but not as slow as you imply. A $1000 Mac can generally run programs well enough to check them.

      --
      Twelve fingers or one, its how you play. ~Gattaca (Vincent)
    4. Re:Emulation? by mosch · · Score: 1

      i've got a dual 1.0 and virtual pc runs like a dog in it... it works, but it's really only good enough for veryifying something, i wouldn't want to work in it all day. On my PB12, it varies between slothlike slowness and uselessness, depending on what you want to do, and whether or not the processor speed is reduced at the moment. An intel notebook is a much better choice if the job basically consists of doing things on intel.

    5. Re:Emulation? by mosch · · Score: 1

      Also, Virtual PC is funky. Things mostly work, but my VirtualPC has some quirks that I don't have on my real PCs. It could just be windows brokenness, but it's hard to pin down the blame when windows acts weird in an emulated environment.

    6. Re:Emulation? by Usquebaugh · · Score: 1

      Screw VPC use VMWare much better product IMHO.

    7. Re:Emulation? by kableh · · Score: 2, Informative

      Much different product, and not just MHO.

      Virtual PC emulates an x86 processor. VMware, as the name implies, creates a virtual machine. Two completely different tasks. Emulating, as you would imagine, has much greater overhead, so VPC is going to be much slower.

    8. Re:Emulation? by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Uh. A celeron 366 can generally run programs well enough to check them.

      --
    9. Re:Emulation? by penguinboy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      How do you emulate the price of an Intel notebook on a Mac?

    10. Re:Emulation? by Baumi · · Score: 1

      Running a compiler using VPC would be too slow to get any real work done.
      The Codewarrior option could work, however.

    11. Re:Emulation? by Bud · · Score: 1
      Don't even think about it. Virtual PC feels like an old Pentium on even the fastest Macs. It's OK for doing stuff once in a while, but as an independent developer you simply can't afford wasting hours every day waiting for your project to compile.

      For a while, I developed Windows software using VMWare under Linux/i386. VMWare is impressively fast, lagging perhaps 25% from native Windows on the same machine. It integrates nicely into Linux and X11. In short, it's really usable in day-to-day use. Virtual PC runs like molasses on a comparable Mac, and I wouldn't even consider using it for Windows development.

      I'm currently using a TiBook 667 for e-mail, surfing, PIM, writing docs, ssh sessions and coding in Java and C. The Windows PC runs Windows natively (who needs Linux when you can have Mac OS X?) and is dedicated to compiling, debugging and testing native code.

      FWIW, I also tried using the Windows PC remotely from the Mac through VNC and MS Remote Desktop, but it didn't work out. UI feedback lags, the PC bluescreens every now and then and non-US keyboard support is abysmal.

      --Bud

    12. Re:Emulation? by xombo · · Score: 1

      Virtual PC is fast enough for everything except playing games, and that is from slow video emulation, for programming, Virtual PC would be perfect.

  2. Suggestion #1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Get a job developing for macs.

    Problem solved.

  3. Go with IBM Thinkpad by akehurst · · Score: 3, Informative

    I do all of my development on my IBM Thinkpad T23, with built-in wireless and Ethernet. It is a workhorse and has not let me down. IBM is a great company with excellent support for their products.

    --
    -
    1. Re:Go with IBM Thinkpad by timmyf2371 · · Score: 1
      Completely agree with you.

      The Thinkpad was my very first laptop and having used other brands which my friends have and also in computer stores, I think they're by far the best out there.

      Hardware is great quality, next day service, support is also good.

      --

      Backup not found: (A)bort (R)etry (P)anic
    2. Re:Go with IBM Thinkpad by kraksmoka · · Score: 1

      did my first site on one and used it for almost two years with no complaints, high reliability. they are very nice laptops, for a non-mac laptop. of course i'm on a tiBook now :) still, i like their durability and solidness. if you're gonna have to go with a brick/toaster, this is the cream of the crop

      --
      "You never want a serious crisis to go to waste." - Rahm Emanuel
    3. Re:Go with IBM Thinkpad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ditto. Thinkpads are, by a huge stretch, the best overall notebooks.

      Not the cheapest, not the fastest (frequently Dell), not the most durable (Panasonic Toughbook), not the most stylish (always Sony), but certainly the best overall balance of performance, reliability, durability, and good industrial design.

      I'm still using my 3 yr old T21, running various servers under VMWare...

    4. Re:Go with IBM Thinkpad by vought · · Score: 1
      I used a ThinkPad for eighteen months (A21m), and I can honestly say it's the first Wintel laptop (mine was running Win2k Pro) I really enjoyed using - at least from a hardware perspective.

      I have used PowerBooks since they were introduced - my first one was a PowerBook 170, and I've owned at least one Powerbook from each subsequent generation (working at Apple made this easier).

      The ThinkPad is the closest any other manufacturer has come to emulating Apple's design and feature sense (surpassing it in some ways) of understated, well-proportioned and functional laptops.

      I don't think you'd be disappointed with a ThinkPad, unless you absolutely abhor black plastic.

    5. Re:Go with IBM Thinkpad by op00to · · Score: 1

      I just got a Thinkpad T40.

      Coolness: Thin, light, good on batteries, Pentium M rules, IBM build quality, angled shape and black color makes me think i have the stealth fighter of laptops

      Suckiness: No linux support for integrated intel pro/wireless 802.11b card (that's about my only qualm)

      I'm pretty sick of all the fat 30 pound blobs of plastic that compaq et al are regurgitating. They all feel like they'll bend in half if you don't hold them with two hands. You can sign your willie's death warrant unless you put something to protect you from the heat generated by these fatties. The IBM T40 was a breath of fresh air to me. If you're leet and own IBM stock, you can even knock a few hundred off the price. Of course, I also love the look of Volvo 240's, so your tastes may be different.

  4. Get the Thinkpad by PD · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There's a rule to follow: "Thou shalt lust after no other laptop than an IBM Thinkpad."

    I've owned three of them, and all have been really great computers. I've owned other laptops, and they failed to measure up to the standard set by the Thinkpad.

    My current machine is an A21m with 800mhz Pentium III, running Linux. All the hardware on the machine works with Linux. I have use it every day for work for the past 2.5 years, and it's just plain reliable. It's worth the money I paid for it, and I've noticed that the prices have dropped a lot. You can get a Thinkpad for much much less than what I paid for mine.

    My next laptop will be an IBM Thinkpad.

    1. Re:Get the Thinkpad by MrAndrews · · Score: 2, Informative

      Toshiba used to make really good laptops, but their newer ones you'll hear aren't meeting the same standards. Dell makes truly awful laptops (they seem to miss the point of portable completely)...
      Thinkpads are really truly the only non-Apple laptop I've used that really did the job right. They're small, sturdy, and they do what they need to do. If you need something powerful, you'll need a desktop too, but really the resolution, speed and energy efficiency of the Thinkpads are really quite good.
      Though of course, I still prefer my iBook :)

    2. Re:Get the Thinkpad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really?

    3. Re:Get the Thinkpad by BJH · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'd say the same (I've been using a Thinkpad as my main laptop for just over two years now, and like you, everything in it works with Linux), except that IBM now have some models that will only take particular types of wireless adapters - apparently the current T40 is one of these.

      Before you put your cash down, do your homework with Google to make sure that it will do what you want.

    4. Re:Get the Thinkpad by Jellybob · · Score: 1

      I don't think Dell miss the point... they just choose to ignore it.

      From what I've seen of Dell's, they're not really designing machines to be used on the move, they're designing computers you can (relatively) easily carry to another desk regularly, or sit in front of the TV with (assuming you don't mind burning your legs if you're in shorts.)

    5. Re:Get the Thinkpad by MrAndrews · · Score: 1

      I would agree with you except that (after having tried to carry my Dell around in a carrying case twice and learning how bloody heavy the thing is), I never used it except as a not-at-my-desk-but-still-like-my-desktop machine... and it still came apart from the strain of being opened and closed every day so that the screen stopped working in less than a year.
      The primary function of a portable computer is that it be portable, and if it's not physically capable of withstanding that function, it's not very well-made.

    6. Re:Get the Thinkpad by JamesOfTheDesert · · Score: 1
      Toshiba used to make really good laptops, but their newer ones you'll hear aren't meeting the same standards.

      Sorry to hear this. I have a Portege 3480, a nice, ultra-slim that has stood up well over the last three years.

      With the add-on battery it runs for about 7 hours and weighs roughly 5 pounds. I recently discovered that upgrading the hard drive is a breeze, and did, at one time, have it set up for dual boot with Win2k and Redhat 7. Even got my Lucent wifi card running under linux.

      When I was shopping for my laptop the choice came down to IBM or Toshiba; I think I went with Tosh because IBM couldn't ship me a unit in time for a trip overseas.

      --

      Java is the blue pill
      Choose the red pill
    7. Re:Get the Thinkpad by Goner · · Score: 1

      My girlfriend, yesterday, got a T40. It's pentium m, but not centrino, because it comes with a Cisco Mini-PCI wifi card. Which, incidentally works with Linux, unlike the intel (centrino) chipset. I mean, Theodore T'so uses a T40p, what more endorsement do you need... (of course he is an IBM employee).

      Her university employee discount factored heavily into the purchase, but they can still be had sub-$2000 with pretty nice internals from web dealers. I think the machine is going to last her a long time.

    8. Re:Get the Thinkpad by BJH · · Score: 1

      Well, Theo's endorsement isn't entirely wholehearted... from his T40 page:

      One word of warning: although the Cisco Aironet 340 and 350 PCMCIA card is one of the better supported and most functional wireless cards in Linux world, the Cisco mini-pci version of the card has apprently very different interfaces and is so its support is perhaps the most primitive. This will hopefully change in the near future.
      Unfortunately, the mpi350 from Cisco driver doesn't support the standard Linux wireless tools API, so the standard iwconfig, iwlist, et. al, won't work. Instead only the propietary Cisco ioctl's are supported, so you have to use the binary-only GUI tools supplied by Cisco. Limited command-line management and status information can be accomplished via the proc interface, available via /proc/driver/mpi350/SSID and /proc/driver/mpi350/Status.


      And from a different page:

      Update 2003/06/26: With the help of Ted Ts'o web page on the T40, I finally swapped the unsupported internal IBM 802.11 a/b wireless card for a Cisco mini-PCI card (IBM P/N 31P8301) instead. This card seems to be the only solution to have a working wireless connection currently, except using an external PCMCIA card. In fact, the BIOS refuses to boot if the mini-PCI wireless card is not the Intel one, the IBM one or the Cisco one, for wireless regulatory reasons. The manual of the Cisco card is clear on the subject : Attention for the BIOS Lock Protection: The ThinkPad computers listed in the above IBM site are designed to operate with the proper wireless options. If you install an unauthorized wireless LAN Mini-PCI Card, your ThinkPad does not start and emits beeps with the BIOS lock out.

    9. Re:Get the Thinkpad by Goner · · Score: 1

      From that different page, down at the bottom, you see that airo-linux supports the card now, at least in CVS. I guess there are difficulties if you get a 3rd party Cisco card, but her machine came with one preinstalled from IBM. The model number is 237375U if you're curious.

    10. Re:Get the Thinkpad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My Dell Inspiron 7500 just blew out both hinges this morning, after having lost assorted bits over the last year, and developing a nifty three-finger-fat stripe of dying pixels down the screen. Granted it's 3 years old now, but the wheels shouldn't be coming off so soon. Never another Dell....

  5. I vote for IBM by guacamole · · Score: 4, Interesting

    IBM laptops win my vote for having the best ballance of quality, features, performance, portability, sturdiness, and design. Yes, this all comes at a higher price but if you look, it's about the same or less than the equivalent Apple gear. Moreover, amazingly the prices did go down compared to say 2 years ago. I remember there was no way to get a T-series Thinkpad for under $2000 and it still would be stripped down unless you get a $3000. These days you can buy a well configured T-series Thinkpad for under $2000 or you could opt for an cheaper R-series and pay the prices pretty much in Apple's 12inch iBook range for it (excapt that you'd get a better screen and much faster CPU)

  6. Which Compaq? by JLester · · Score: 3, Informative

    Which Compaqs have you looked at? I agree that their consumer/home versions are pretty cheesy looking.

    We use the Evo N800c model at work. They look professional, are very reliable, and work with everything we've tried. We've been all Compaq except laptops up until the past year (IBM Thinkpads). Once I saw the newer Evo notebooks, we switched over to the Compaq laptops as well. The IBM's were great too, just pricey as you said. I don't even normally put my Compaq in a case unless I need extra peripherals or are traveling very far with it. It's pretty sturdy.

    Before Thinkpads, we used all Toshibas. They were great a few years ago. I think their build-quality and reliability has gone down though, at least based on the ones we've bought.

    Jason

    --
    "FORMAT C:" - Kills bugs dead!
    1. Re:Which Compaq? by Myrcurial · · Score: 1

      I find this to be a terribly important question. Compaq (and most companies) manufacture a "professional" line as well as a "retail" line. If you shop at (FutureShop|BestBuy|CircuitCity) you will only find the "retail" line. The pro line costs quite a bit more for similar specifications, but is much more durable.

      If you get the pro line system, you will be happier. You may not have the fastest GPU or 5.1 audio on the notebook, but honestly, you do have to give up a little on the capability to get the mobility you want. If you NEED insane graphics performance, you're going to have to put up with the weight penalty.

      I have a Compaq Evo N610c - it's a P4-2GHz with the 1400x1050 display. I wanted the 15" Powerbook and this is what the company decided would be more appropriate. I've had the machine for about 9 months now and despite my best efforts to abuse it, it continues to operate relatively well. I've had the keyboard replaced once and that's it.

      Interesting side note, when I took the notebook to a local store proudly advertised as a Compaq Authorized Repair facility, I discovered that they were staffed primarily by chimps. They claimed that the notebook had to be sent away for a keyboard replacement as they can't work on laptops. I left in disgust (I'm more than qualified to swap a keyboard on a laptop) and called Compaq Canada. Sure enough, the replacement keyboard arrived in the mail the following day. I'll give you a hint -- avoid CompuSmart on Yonge in Toronto, they don't know much.

  7. Find a good trade-off, and choose. by Flying-Cow-Man · · Score: 4, Informative

    What I've always liked about Apple's notebooks is their ability to make the right compromises between size, weight, cost, speed, expandability, etc. I'm not saying they're perfect, but I agree with you that they're usually a lot better thought out than most of the wintel notebooks out there. You're better off asking yourself what your priorities are in a portable machine, and then picking a box that was built with the same priorities as you. As you said, the VAIO line is well designed, but often lacks features and speed. Do you need that extra speed? If you're looking for a devel machine then maybe you should just bite the bullet and buy a chunkier box.

    Another poster suggested testing your apps in VPC on the Mac, but I think a virtual machine is the last place you want to be debugging test code. Any chance you could move to high level development? That way the test platform wouldn't really matter, just use your OO language of choice.

    --
    Don't knock HTML email. It makes my life easier, since I /don't/ _have_ to "find" STUPID *workarounds
  8. IBM by NetJunkie · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Another vote for IBM. I'm currently on a T30 and had a T23 before this. I use my TP 24/7 and it never gets turned off. It gets a ton of use, not just sitting idle. It never crashes or dies. Should you have a hardware issue you'll have it back to you in 48 hours. They aren't the cheapest, but you get what you pay for.

    I couldn't work without my notebook...and I'm not giving up this T30 for anything...but maybe a T40. :)

    1. Re:IBM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I fully agree. Rensselaer's Mobile Computing program which requires all students to now have laptops (it's approximately 4 years old, and those students who were non-freshman when it started were grandfathered in) gives out IBMs. The first year was the IBM 600E - clunky, but okay. RPI switched over to the T series and everyone has been very happy with them. The T20, the T22, and the T30 were next. This incoming class is lucky enough to get T40's at greatly discounted prices.

      Pentium M 1.6 GHz, 512MB RAM
      80GB internal hard drive
      14.1" SXGA+ (1400x1050) TFT display
      32MB ATI Mobility Radeon 9000 video chipset
      10/100/1000 on-board Ethernet and 56K modem
      80211.a/b integrated wireless
      CD-RW/DVD-ROM combo drive
      Bluetooth ...
      Weighs less than 5 pounds

      They have onboard gigabit ethernet according to the RPI spec (sounds wrong to me, but if I'm not I'm mad jealous)! I say go with a ThinkPad.

    2. Re:IBM by Shaleh · · Score: 1

      gigabit is almost as cheap as 100mbit these days. For company's who are willing to put quality ahead of cost it gigabit is an easy add-on.

    3. Re:IBM by mosch · · Score: 1

      Some of the T40s do indeed have gigabit ethernet, though I doubt you'll have gigabit in the dorms or on the afs servers anytime soon (assuming of course that they still have the afs servers... I may have just dated myself).

    4. Re:IBM by Tower · · Score: 2, Informative

      Disclaimer - I am an IBM employee.

      That being said, I got my wife an A21 for her use (graduate student / teaching), and we've certainly been very happy with that (the employee discount was very nice, too). My current primary x86 workstation at work is a T30, which plays nicely at home with the integrated wireless card (Cisco Airport 340/350).

      Compared to other laptos I've used in the past, the Thinkpads do seem to be a little more forgiving of a little abuse, and from a hardware standpoint are quite a bit more stable for constant use. They are a little more expensive than some other brands for the same drive space/pro speed, but the rest of the build quality is well worth it, IMNSHO.

      --
      "It's tough to be bilingual when you get hit in the head."
    5. Re:IBM by di0s · · Score: 1

      I use my TP 24/7 and it never gets turned off.
      That's gotta hurt...

  9. Did you check out Fujitsu--Offline? by dotcomian · · Score: 5, Informative

    I was roughly on the same quest as you a year ago. I spent too much time searching for online product reviews that it eventually crush my head. I decided to go to a local computer mall, and browse around the products that I've reviewed online. The product that I actually picked was none of that I thought was good (based on the reviews), it was a Fujitsu Lifebook S Series (6010); as I expected it's the closest thing that can come to iBook's quality, screen is definetly the best of all other notebooks I've used (Dell, Compaq, Toshiba, Vaio, Acer, Gateway, etc), the magnesium alloy screen cover is very solid. And oh, it has a superdrive--the same one used in ibooks!

    All in all, it's the tiny bits of design detail that catch my attention on this well built pc, fujitsu actually manufacture it themselve in Japan, unlike others that usually outsource their production line to taiwan.

    I would suggest you to go and check out the physical product yourself, ask for a live demo, try launching programs, use the disk, connect to an external mouse just like how you'd use the computer; a 20 minute of physical test is much better then a 2 weeks of reading online reviews.

    1. Re:Did you check out Fujitsu--Offline? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I sincerely must second the recommendation of the Lifebook. Not only are they well-built and pretty, some of the models are so skinny I'm afraid to cut myself on one of those things.

    2. Re:Did you check out Fujitsu--Offline? by tbmaddux · · Score: 1
      And oh, it has a superdrive--the same one used in ibooks!
      You either meant to say PowerBooks, which ship with combo (DVD/CD-RW) drives and Superdrives (DVD-R/CD-RW), or you meant to say that the Fujitsu has a combo drive like the ones in the iBooks which do not have a Superdrive.

      Judging from what I see on product pages for the Fujitsu LifeBook S6000 you meant to say combo drive, since that is what they have.

      I should also point out in addition that the PowerBook drives are slot-loading, while the Fujitsu (and iBook) drives are not.

      --
      Can't you see that everyone is buying station wagons?
    3. Re:Did you check out Fujitsu--Offline? by BigGerman · · Score: 1

      I got Lifebook E7110 last December and could not be happier. Very well put together, magnesium-whatever body, 1/3 skinnier than Inspiron, runs Mandrake like a charm including built-in WiFi and wireless mouse.

    4. Re:Did you check out Fujitsu--Offline? by hfcs · · Score: 1
      Another Fujitsu vote from me.

      I have a S-4542 that's pushing 3 years old and I could not have been happier with. I've beat on it a lot and it hasn't skipped a beat.

      I'm planning on replacing it with another Fujitsu S-series in the fall.

    5. Re:Did you check out Fujitsu--Offline? by Una · · Score: 1

      Well, since I odviously cant mod the parent any higher then +5, Im going to reply to this.

      Iv gone through 7 diffrent notebooks over the last 5 years, and the only one to ever last longer then 9 months was my old Fujitsu Lifebook 520T.

      Infact it was still in service up untill last year, when it finally met its demise when a drunk friend decided to see if it was waterproof (!) and threw it in my (saltwater) pool.

      I cant say enough about Fujitsu build quality.
      IIRC, one of foundations of Fujitsu Eight (Fujitsu-PC) is "Never sacrifice quality".
      That may have just been BS late 90s marketing, but from my experience, it sounds about right of the company.

    6. Re:Did you check out Fujitsu--Offline? by proub · · Score: 1

      My old Lifebook 535T is still in use despite my tendency to be less-than-gentle with my gear. Solidly-built, and it was a great deal for its time. These days, it sits on a shelf happily performing firewall duties.

      Never a moment's problem with the machine. Next time I get to pick a new laptop (as opposed to company-mandated specs), it's very likely to be a Fujitsu.

      -paul

      --
      "Irony is so September 10th"
      Matt Miller, alt.fan.spinnwebe
  10. Sharp, Panasonic by ObviousGuy · · Score: 2, Informative

    Sharp Mebius Muramasa It is smaller and lighter than Apple's brick. It runs on Transmeta so you can get geek points too.

    Panasonic Let's Note Again, smaller and lighter than Apple's iBrick.

    It continues to amaze me that people look at the iBook as some kind of zenith of hardware design when it is bigger, heavier, and has only one mouse button compared to the Windows-based alternatives. I guess if you are comparing the Apple to an IBM or Dell laptop you'd have a point but with all sorts of more stylishly designed laptops than those available you'd be hard pressed to claim that Apple is leading in the field.

    --
    I have been pwned because my /. password was too easy to guess.
    1. Re:Sharp, Panasonic by trouser · · Score: 0

      One mouse button?

      My iBook has five buttons and a scroll wheel all right here on this little USB mouse I've got plugged into it. You must have bought the wrong model.

      --
      Now wash your hands.
    2. Re:Sharp, Panasonic by j0nkatz · · Score: 1

      Heh.

      That was a pretty good troll untill you said the part about the one button mouse. :)

      --
      Don't mod me, bro'!!!!
    3. Re:Sharp, Panasonic by SN74S181 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, cripes. My cheap Toshiba 486 is a Beowulf Cluster, if I just plug it into that big bunch of machines over there in the next room.

      If someone wants a laptop for travel, it's likely they won't want to plug in external widgets for basic functionality like a pointing device.

    4. Re:Sharp, Panasonic by darkwhite · · Score: 1

      IBM and Dell? Poorly designed?

      Most IBM's models and many Dell's models kick Apple in the ass in terms of durability, performance, endurance, build quality, and many other parameters. Some of them are obscenely big, but that's because they were not designed to be small. Those before P-M eat obscene amounts of power, but that's not IBM's/Dell's fault. In the portable range, IBM and Dell have models to compete with Apple formidably. Design is not just about flashy looks. Some Vaio models look awesome and work like crap.

      Sharp, Panasonic, Sony and Fujitsu all have great ultraportables that will become even greater when they all migrate to ULV P-M, that's true. I look very much forward to that, and to the US manufacturers catching up to the fact that the ultraportable-portable range is the hottest market in IT right now.

      --

      [an error occurred while processing this directive]
    5. Re:Sharp, Panasonic by GiMP · · Score: 1

      PowerPC Linux has great feature for emulating mouse buttons in the kernel. I hit fn-ctrl for middle click and fn-alt for right-click; I actually prefer this to most laptops as I never accidently click the buttons as one will likely do on an intel laptop; accidental clicking of the middle button can be devestating if for instance your buffer contains 'rm -rf /' and you paste that into a root-shell :P

    6. Re:Sharp, Panasonic by obi · · Score: 1


      Those are nice, but they have thesame problem all subnotebooks have: crappy 3D.

      God, I really wish someone would come out with a subnotebook, preferably a form factor like the Portege 2000/R100 series, or Vaio SR-series, or anything small and cool like you find on http://www.dynamism.com/ - but with some muscle for 3D, an Radeon mobility 9000 would be nice for instance. I don't care that much about processor speed, harddrive space, optical drive, etc.

      The closest I got was the 12" Powerbook, but Nvidia on PPC is a bad match for Linux sadly enough.

      It pisses me off. I've been looking for a decent laptop for a while now, and haven't found anything that matches these criteria: linux on a small notebook with good (and supported) 3D card (a 7500 with 32MB I could just live with, Nvidia on x86 too, radeon mobility 9000 or higher would be great)

    7. Re:Sharp, Panasonic by cyb97 · · Score: 1

      How often do you put rm -rf / in your buffer ?

      It's not like it's the most common command on the planet...

    8. Re:Sharp, Panasonic by siskbc · · Score: 1
      PowerPC Linux has great feature for emulating mouse buttons in the kernel. I hit fn-ctrl for middle click and fn-alt for right-click; I actually prefer this to most laptops as I never accidently click the buttons as one will likely do on an intel laptop; accidental clicking of the middle button

      No, then you have the problem of accidentally hitting the wrong button modifier. I'm not seeing the advantage outside of some serious klunkiness.

      devestating if for instance your buffer contains 'rm -rf /' and you paste that into a root-shell :P

      I might close those root shells, eh?

      --

      -Looking for a job as a materials chemist or multivariat

    9. Re:Sharp, Panasonic by GiMP · · Score: 1

      No, then you have the problem of accidentally hitting the wrong button modifier. I'm not seeing the advantage outside of some serious klunkiness.

      It is much less likely for the cat to hit fn-ctrl than it is to press a single mouse button.

      I might close those root shells, eh?

      As a systems administrator, that would be pretty pointless... how can I work without a root shell (and no, I won't type 'sudo' before every command)

    10. Re:Sharp, Panasonic by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Well that's fortunate. But I'm sure it happens.

      Imagine if you were about to type rm -rf /somedirectory/directory1/directory2

      And you accidentally pressed enter way too soon...

      I prefer to do a cd first and then rm from there and be extra careful when using those powerful runes ;).

      But people make mistakes.

      Also in theory if you had a product called slash and the uninstall procedure was rm -rf slash

      Then guess what ;). Don't think that happens? Well I heard someone had a product which used a directory called "star" and one day someone was given the uninstall procedure over the phone...

      The uninstall command to a bit longer to return than expected by the support person.

      Link.

      --
    11. Re:Sharp, Panasonic by cyb97 · · Score: 1

      Most people working support has enough experience to know that saying "star" or "slash" over the phone requires them to say "symbol star" or "asterisk" instead of relying on the customer to understand the double meaning...

      I've been using *nix for dunno how many years (more than I have windows I guess) and I haven't once done a rm -rf / (apart from once on purpose... dieing system... blahblah)

    12. Re:Sharp, Panasonic by r84x · · Score: 1
      ...and has only one mouse button compared to the Windows-based alternatives.

      [rant]

      Seriously, why are you STILL using the old one button vs. two button argument here? I thought we were beyond that. It's really not that big of a deal, unless you are an incredibly stubborn Wintel nazi, in which case you must feel a need to immaturely lash out at others.

      Whatever the case, freaking GET OVER IT. Way back in the day, this may have meant something, but now, no one cares.

      [/rant]

      --
      Karma: Can there be a void?

      .. -. - . .-. .-. --- -...

    13. Re:Sharp, Panasonic by Raptor+CK · · Score: 1

      The iBook and 12" Powerbook aren't designed to compete with ultra-small Japanese laptops. They're really just designed to be as small as Apple's people consider "usable."

      Now, as for the one mouse button, you have to remember, as long as Apple supports only Mac OS, they're going to stick with just one mouse button on the hardware. It's just how they do things, and it's a bit silly to pick on them for targeting their own OS.

      Now, as for Apple's sense of style, well, that's subjective, so I'm not even going to challenge your point. I like it, you don't. That's all there can ever be to that argument.

      However, Apple's sense of hardware design is pretty solid. Make a laptop that the average consumer can use comfortably, cram it to the gills with that the consumer needs, and attempt to make it damned near unbreakable. Then, on top of that, make it mind-numbingly simple to use. I'd say it succeeds on those fronts, as my 12" Powerbook just works, it holds together well, and it does what I need from a laptop.

      Of course, before this, I used a Toshiba Libretto 110, so I know what it's like to use a smaller laptop. While the Libretto's a bit of an extreme case, it's also proof that smaller isn't always better. I had to relearn to type on the miniature keyboard, and required a lot of modified computer habits before it became the nearly-perfect laptop for me. In fact, the main reason I sold it was that I needed a bigger hard drive, more RAM, and the warranty had expired. Usability, however, is completely different on an ultraportable than on a notebook/subnote, and it's that concept which has prevented Apple from making anything smaller than a 12" laptop.

      --
      Raptor
      "Procrastination is great. It gives me a lot more time to do things that I'm never going to do."
  11. Buy a ThinkPad by trouser · · Score: 0

    I'm using an iBook right now. It's great.
    It sure won't build Intel binaries though.
    ThinkPad. Used a borrowed one for a little while.
    Not as sexy as an iBook. Who'd root a laptop anyway?
    Very solid machine the ol' ThinkPad.
    I'd seriously consider buying one when the iBook retires.

    --
    Now wash your hands.
    1. Re:Buy a ThinkPad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Was that a Haiku?

    2. Re:Buy a ThinkPad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You write the worst haiku I have ever seen.

  12. IBM Thinkpad by martinde · · Score: 1

    I've had several over the years, and they are excellent. Even better, IBM semi-officially supports Linux on the models that I've owned...
    (I.e. there are FAQs on IBM's support site discussing how to run Linux on the models I've used.)

  13. Fujitsu and Sharp by Kris_J · · Score: 2, Informative

    I've had on the whole positive experiences with both Fujitsu and Sharp. (I've linked to the latest models, not the ones I've used.) They may not be titanium, but they're solid and not overly bloated.

    1. Re:Fujitsu and Sharp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My FIL has that Sharp Mebius. It's a very nice machine. Built-in 802.11, removable DVD R/W, and my personal favorite a scrolling column on the touchpad.

  14. Alienware? by E1v!$ · · Score: 4, Informative

    With all the big names flying around, have you considered an Alienware machine? They're not the lightest in the world but they look to be fairly high quality.

    They bill for games, but performance is performance.

    1. Re:Alienware? by Bastian · · Score: 1

      Haven't seen their laptops, but their desktops are all right.

      As long as you don't mind paying twice the reasonable price for a computer they will take a year to deliver.

    2. Re:Alienware? by babbage · · Score: 1
      Did you read the original question? One of his selection criteria had to do with the fact that the Toshibas & Compaqs he saw were "grossly over-decorated", and yet these machines are like an elegant Frank Lloyd Wright construction when compared to the tacky monsters that Alienware specializes in.

      Are you saying that Alienware has a "still good quality but doesn't look like a pro wrestler's sunday suit" section of their catalog that they just don't, for whatever reason, care to share with the web-browsing public? Or they really all that ugly?

      :-)

    3. Re:Alienware? by Zuph · · Score: 1

      http://www.sagernotebook.com/index.html the exact same notebook, minus the crappy paint job, for much less.

    4. Re:Alienware? by Coke+in+a+Can · · Score: 4, Informative

      Alienware resells Cleo (?) laptops, just like Sager and a few other manufacturers. Sager notebooks are the same quality, and $600 less in the case I configured. The exact model is the Sager 5670 (that alienware sells as the Area 51m). The support from powernotebooks.com, one of Sager's resellers, is really amazing.

      sager: sagernotebook.com
      powernotebooks: powernotebooks.com

  15. check out Polywell by Tumbleweed · · Score: 2, Interesting

    They have some nice-looking laptops - especially their new Centrino-based model.

    1. Re:check out Polywell by NSObject · · Score: 1
      To get attention, one doesn't have to be fleshly, doesn't have to be loud and doesn't have to scream LOOK AT ME.
      Perhaps this isn't the right machine for ./ posters.
  16. What about crosscompiling? by alph0ns3 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I think you can even make binaries for windows with a mingw crosscompiler... Thank god for GCC!

  17. same boat by klupo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I was in the same boat you are in now and I chose the ibook, it's sweet, but I also needed to program for the intel platform. I bought a second machine ( a beefy workstation ) and I rdesktop into that fullscreen to do my programming. It works very great even over a wan if the bandwitdh is there. Get the ibook you won't regret it.

    --
    "Talent does what it can; genius does what it must."
  18. I bought a desktop replacement a month ago by gadfium · · Score: 3, Informative

    I researched what was available pretty extensively, and chose an IBM Thinkpad G40.

    I wanted something powerful, but this was for home, so price was very much a consideration. I looked hard at a couple of Toshiba's, and at the Dell range, but the IBM came in at a slightly lower price for the features I wanted, and I know from experience that Thinkpads are high quality. I did also look at the iBooks, but the prices were way too high for the feature set.

    For what it's worth, I wanted 40 Gb / 512 Mb/ DVD/CR-RW combo / 15" screen / XP Pro / 2 GHz or better processor. Size / Weight / battery life weren't an issue. The G40 I bought has a 2.4 GHz processor. Unlike most Thinkpads, it doesn't have removable drives. I was willing to cut the iBook some slack on processor speed (although the ones I tried in store were very slow; they were short on RAM as displayed).

    Relative price probably varies from country to country, and month to month, so if you live in a different country from me (probable), and since my purchase was a month ago, you might find something else works better for you.

  19. Which model did you buy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or did you pay extra for the luxury of having that usable mouse?

  20. Sager by MrProgrammer · · Score: 5, Informative
    I use a Sager notebook. Sturdy, inexpensive, and extremely powerful.

    Sager laptop owner forums

    Sager reseller

    It may be a somewhat unknown brand, but I have been totally blown away with it. Check out the specs and the forums.

    1. Re:Sager by standsolid · · Score: 2, Interesting

      amen to this. sager makes some excellent laptops. i see all these "get a thinkpad" posts. sure they are fantastic but....

      sager makes the best laptop for what you're lookign for. a friend of mine has one and that thing is nice to use.

      --
      WTPOUAWYHTTOTWPA
      What's the point of using acronyms when you have to type out the whole phrase anyways?
    2. Re:Sager by Zuph · · Score: 1

      Their High end laptops are the exact same as alienware's, except they don't have the paint job.

  21. Buy some silver paint... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and make that Toshiba laptop look nice and shiney.

    To disguise the bloated thickness: carefully modify a cushion to hide the thickness and use this when using in public.

    Alternatve plan: Find a big Apple sticker and stick it on. You will find that the machine instantly loses 5 pounds.

  22. why Porche of course ;) by Ratso+Baggins · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://www.vprmatrix.com/products_notebook_200A5.a sp

    --

    --
    "we live in a post-ideological world..." - Billy Bragg.

  23. sturdy by denthijs · · Score: 1, Interesting

    if it really has to be solid gear there is no substitute for the real deal.
    (rugged laptops have been mentioned a lot here on /. like in this article a while back
    Now apple does make some very nice sturdy ibooks and some very nice looking titaniums.
    And that it can withstand all the chaos and abuse those weird apple-addicts throw at it deserves some respect,
    But these babies,... these babies are _made_ for rock and roll!

  24. Get an emulator! by djmitche · · Score: 1

    What you need is an x86 emulator! There is nothing quite so beautiful to behold (and sturdy, hardworking, and reliable) as the iBook. It's just the only way to go!

  25. This is expected... by OneFix · · Score: 4, Informative

    The thing you have to do is understand why IBM and Apple are at the top of their markets.

    One reason...they build their own Notebooks...take a look at this page and then you'll understand why...

    The short answer is Alienware, Toshiba, Dell, Compaq, etc are all made by the same companies...chances are they are all the same laptop.

    Sony, IBM, and Apple all used to design their own notebooks...Apple kind of has to (yet they still use ODMs to assemble their boxen), and Sony and IBM have started to slip recently (using some of Quanta's ODM systems).

    But if you want to find out how good the notebook is, find out who really made it.

    Of course, you can always buy from the site that I linked to. They will sell notebooks without an OS and even have a Linux Forum. Not to mention they have unmatched customer service.

  26. How durable do you want? by Myself · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Let's be serious here, Apple laptops aren't all that durable. Two of my friends have had the screens break, one in a bookbag and one in a laptop bag. With a few exceptions, I'd say the average laptop now is a lot less durable than 10 years ago.

    I've picked up two used Panasonic Toughbooks on eBay and they've been attention-getters ever since. How many laptops can you stand on, throw across the room, use as hammers, and use in the rain, all while your favorite mp3s are playing?

    I'm a big form-follows-function guy. The Toughbooks are all black, magnesium alloy with rubber covers over the ports. They're elegant in the same way a Beretta pistol is a work of art.

    I've taken to keeping my Tougbook in a bag lately, not to protect it from the outside world, but to protect the outside world from it. The rubber feet came off the bottom some time ago, and the metal case has a tendency to mar floors if I drop it. I do that sometimes just for effect.

    I presently own two Toughbooks: a CF-25, which is a full-size machine (comparable to any other laptop). It's a Pentium 150 with a nice comfy keyboard, 1024x768 screen behind a polycarbonate sheet, three(!) PCMCIA slots, and a gel pad surrounding the hard drive, which I upgraded from 4 gig to 10. The lack of CardBus and USB finally forced me to upgrade to my present machine, which is a...

    CF-17, a Celeron 300 subnotebook. It's petite, the (touch)screen is only 800x600, and the keyboard takes some getting used to. With 128 meg and the 20 gig drive I dropped in it, it's more power than I need. (My desktop is only a 300MHz machine, for comparison.) It's got a single USB1.1 port, and I occasionally stick a 480Mb/s "hi speed" USB card in the slot when I need to use an external burner.

    There are of course more recent Toughbook models, up to Pentium III and probably faster, but my budget and needs are more modest. Lately Panasonic's come out with a few "semi"-rugged models, which translates to "beats the crap out of your Dell, but won't survive a 10' drop onto concrete like the others". They're worth looking into if you're not the type to occasionally toss a load of 2x4's into your truck without noticing the laptop sitting there.

    P.S. I'm not affiliated with Panasonic in any way, just a loyal customer. I could've probably sold a dozen of these machines to people who've been impressed by mine, I should see about becoming a dealer.

    1. Re:How durable do you want? by mosch · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, speaking as a dealer who carries Panasonic Toughbooks, I must concur that they're excellent, high-quality laptops but you pay for the quality. A Toughbook 28 with a p3-800, 256MB, 30GB HD and 12.1" screen will run you somewhere between $4500 and $5000.

    2. Re:How durable do you want? by arska · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, they're not durable at all..
      You see, when my 200lbs-aunt kneed on my iBook, the screen just broke.. without any reason..

      Real men use computers made of steel.. err.. titanium !

    3. Re:How durable do you want? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're elegant in the same way a Beretta pistol is a work of art.

      That, my friend, is not a glowing recommendation. Could it be a Sig Sauer?

    4. Re:How durable do you want? by xombo · · Score: 1

      I presently own two Toughbooks: a CF-25, which is a full-size machine (comparable to any other laptop). It's a Pentium 150 with a nice comfy keyboard, 1024x768 screen behind a polycarbonate sheet, three(!) PCMCIA slots, and a gel pad surrounding the hard drive, which I upgraded from 4 gig to 10. The lack of CardBus and USB finally forced me to upgrade to my present machine, which is a...

      CF-17, a Celeron 300 subnotebook. It's petite, the (touch)screen is only 800x600, and the keyboard takes some getting used to. With 128 meg and the 20 gig drive I dropped in it, it's more power than I need. (My desktop is only a 300MHz machine, for comparison.) It's got a single USB1.1 port, and I occasionally stick a 480Mb/s "hi speed" USB card in the slot when I need to use an external burner.



      1997 called, they want their laptop back.

    5. Re:How durable do you want? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great, just what I need, a slow, old PC that I can't smash to pieces when it finally pushes me over the edge. Great idea.

      Does it come with an uninstallable version of Windows XP too?

  27. www.netlux.com by Sevn · · Score: 1

    I just picked up their NX-8640 and I've been
    VERY impressed. There is also the added benefit of
    being able to buy without an OS installed.

    --
    For every annoying gentoo user, are three even more annoying anti-gentoo crybabies. Take Yosh from #Gimp for example.
    1. Re:www.netlux.com by tf23 · · Score: 1

      Too bad none of them seem to be using a more "mobile" intel chip/chipset. See the specs on their yahoo store.

  28. Re:Holy Crap by SN74S181 · · Score: 4, Funny

    We got rid of the guy where I work who insisted on using a Mac on his desktop. Because, while that alone really wasn't an issue, it was a symptom of a contrarian crank, who was never going to be easy for anybody to work with.

    Think Different indeed.

  29. Thinkpad for sure by TThayer · · Score: 3, Informative

    I work in a shop that sees a ton of desktop's and laptops alike, and the only ones I never see for hardware problems are the Thinkpads. I personally use a beefed up T20 w/a 900MHz PIII and a DVD/CDRW drive, and I couldn't imagine using another laptop (besides the 15" TiBook I lust over). They're built like tanks. I dropped my TP 600 prior to this one about 5 times from 4 feet up before I gave it to my mom. She still uses it for school. Just avoid the i series. They're built like compaqs.

    1. Re:Thinkpad for sure by dubl-u · · Score: 1

      Yeah, they seem pretty much invulnerable. We used a bunch of them for an art project in the Black Rock Desert. I have pictures of me coding away during a dust storm. The laptops all survived happily.

  30. How very nice for you! by fm6 · · Score: 1

    You never have to develop for any platform that you don't like! You lucky dog! But some of us live in the real world.

    1. Re:How very nice for you! by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

      Where is it that you live that you can't choose your employer?

      If you like Macs and want to work with Macs, get a job in the goddamn Mac division of a company, or work at a Mac software company. Yes, if you're working at a company that produces an AIX debugger, you're probably not going to be doing anything except AIX code unless you switch companies.

  31. A good friend of mine... by theIG · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ... was in the same situation. On pricewatch, he found a notebook from MicroPro, with a 2500+ (socketed no less), a 333Mhz fsb, Mobile Radeon 9000 64DDR, 60gig HD, and a really nice 15 inch screen. And if you go to pricewatch, and search for "MicroNote Professional 530", you can get it for under $1,200 dollars. It doesn't get the best battery life (around 2 hours and 10 minutes under normal use), and it's feels almost twice as heavy as my ibook, but it's a very cool machine.

    There are some things I don't like about it though. Of course this machine has some very hot components. At the bottom, there is a large intake just under the CPU, with a solid copper heat sink and heat pipes that bring it to the left side of the notebook, with a turbine to help it along. For this reason, you can't keep it on your lap (both legs) without blocking the airflow. This doesn't seem like a big deal, but if you put your hand next to the vent on the left, you can feel that the air is really hot.

    I wouldn't recommend it if you are looking for an extremely mobile notebook, but if you want one of the most powerful notebooks in production for under $1,200, click here for details. Remember, you get a special deal if you buy it through pricewatch (about $222 I think). If you want any more details, ask me, or him.

  32. Seriously, exactly what do you need? by cait56 · · Score: 3, Informative

    If you are just targetting Intel processors with open source tools, you shouldn't have any problems. If you need to target a non-gnu platform, however, well then you need a really good laptop to compensate for the hassles.

    I was fairly satisfied with a Sony VAIO that a previous employer insisted on paying too much for. (I submitted the specs for an iBook, but they insisted on spending more money) Of course it not only cost more, but ended up needing repairs more often.

    I bought an iBook on my own, but really haven't seen a PC laptop that I would buy on my own yet.

    My advise is to concentrate on the features you most like in a PowerBook/iBook. Is it the display? The ports? General durability? Running a GUI desktop and a Unix shell at the same time?

    If the latter is a factor, as in you might want to do some network analysis in the field, then you want to pre-validate that the laptop you're looking at can be partitioned and dual-booted with either Linux or BSD.

    1. Re:Seriously, exactly what do you need? by danalien · · Score: 1

      may I add one little comment.

      He said he was a pro-programmer. I don't know about him, but as a "not-so-much-gammer" and semi skilled in the same crafts, I found beeing able to controll (manually) what state your CPU is at as a real _MUST HAVE FUNCTION_ :) - as you mostly spend your time typing/reading at your notebook than cracking out high FPS values, so it's handy to switch between "powersavemode(low cpu freq)" to "preformancemode(max cpu freq)" - you save both battery power, and you don't get a hot-potato in your lap & literary a noiseless notebook (when in powersavemode) :) [ sure auto-cpufreq-scaling works, but for the most progs. I run, running at a constant 500Mhz is more than sufficiant - and saves my battery life time a bit more when on the road]

      Does it sound nice and dandy?... Well there's a down side to "windows users" (and I think apple/mac), as the only alternative to go is with a Linux enabled notebook (the only kernel I know of which has support for this function), and I think you have to go with an AMD athlon mobile cpu also ( I haven't even bother to look into if it works on Intel's/apple's NB cpu's - as AMD has allways been my choice for reasons like this, they come with neat features I want and don't cost me my shirt off :)), I know there are patches to the kernel for cpufreq scaling, but as I know it's auto only (exactly as it works in windows/apple osx etc) not also manually .

      as, for a Notebook, I found acer's aspire series as my holly grail - all the features I mentioned, to a reasonable price (if you think ~$1000 for a NB is reasonable, I know I do ).


      ps. if you need help installing a linux distro, check this site

      --
      I don't claim I know more than I know, and if you know you know more than I know, then by all means, let me know.
  33. Professional x86 laptop: IBM. by jpu8086 · · Score: 1

    Yes, you know your own answer. You just posted on slashdot to get affirmation.

    Don't even think about anything else. I have owned/operated a ton of them. Except for the 600 series and their infamous battery problems, IBM laptops are nearly perfect. They do generally have weaker graphics systems then their counterpart, but I have never really had to use the latest graphics or anything like that. However, they invest a lot of money on design: I love their trackpoint. Remember, they were the first company to implement them. Now, it seems most companies offer that option. IMHO, a trackpoint is much easier to use then a heat and/or pressure sensitive input device.

    If you need a clean looking, high performing, low mantainence, ergonomic keyboard and mice, IBM is the answer. WARNING: if you need the latest and greatest graphics, IBM is NOT your answer.

    --
    now supporting:
    cmdrTaco for president '04
    michael for oval office intern summer '05
  34. MOD PARENT UP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please...

  35. Fujitsu or IBM by Penis_Envy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I bought a P2110 a year or so ago, and it was the best laptop I have ever owned (albeit a little slow.) Their laptops tend to use magnesium over cheap, flimsy plastic (dell, the 8100 -- piece of junk) and are well put together, all at a reasonable price. I recently purchased a P5010D, which is almost as good quality as the P2110.

    If you want to spend money, and not on two fujitsu laptops, go with IBM. They use decent plastic and good designs. They are some of the more intelligently designed laptops out there, and have been hardy tools for me in the past.

  36. Flimsy ? by drsmithy · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I've got a work Dell Latitude D600 here, and it's anything but "flimsy". The case is metal (Tri-Metal(tm) to be precise), and has basically no flex (very different to my old TiBook, which flexed considerably). It's (marginally) smaller and lighter than a 14" iBook, and considerably more powerful. OTOH, it's also more expensive :).

    However, you should be able to find a comparable and cheaper machine in its lower-end brother, the D500.

    1. Re:Flimsy ? by Kewjoe · · Score: 1

      if i had mod points, id have modded your post up.

      i ordered a Dell 600M (cousin to your D600) and the build quality is very good. I don't know what the complaining by other posters is about. Might be older Dell's, but i can ensure you their line has improved. And they aren't all heavy and clunky.. the 600m/D600 only weighs about 5lbs.

      I work with Compaq's (80%) and IBM's (20%) at work and the IBM's are nothing special, i don't like the feel of them (T20, T21, T22, T23, X20) they just don't do it for me. Plus they are outrageously expensive. Compaqs are nice, i was looking at the EVO N620c but it was just too expensive. Apple's are too expensive. Toshiba's are too expensive. Dell is the best value, i got a fully loaded laptop (P-M 1.3ghz, 768mb DDR Ram, 40gig hd, Radeon-M 9000 64mb, a/b/g wireless) for a really good price.

  37. Intel != Windows by DA-MAN · · Score: 2, Informative

    The man said he was going to develop on Intel, he didn't say windows.

    --
    Can I get an eye poke?
    Dog House Forum
    1. Re:Intel != Windows by Meowing · · Score: 1

      One of the compilers used by arashiakari is PowerBASIC, which pretty well implies that the target platform is Windows.

  38. You just need to get a dell and install Oracle... by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 2, Funny

    After all, just like the Slashdot ad says, Oracle makes laptops unbreakable.

  39. IBM Thinkpad - another "for" vote by peter+hoffman · · Score: 2, Informative

    I recommend the IBM Thinkpad as well. I hated laptops but I have just spent two years using a 600X and it has made a convert out of me. I just bought a certified pre-owned T30 of my own from the IBM web site.

    My only real complaint is that I didn't get the !@#$% CDROMs for the Windows XP that is installed on it. You are supposed to be satisfied with the recovery partition. The story is if you have a problem with the recovery partition, and the system is under warranty, IBM will fix it ASAP. What I want to know is what am I supposed to do if it's 2:00 in the morning or if the unit is no longer under warranty?

    Also, it is possible for the system to get to the point where you can't boot to access the recovery partition. In that case you are supposed to use a recovery floppy - except there is no floppy drive on the system and there's no documentation on what to put on a bootable CDROM (the floppy is built by some utility)!

    Even if I wanted to pay for it twice and I bought a retail copy of XP I still lose because now I don't have the IBM-specific drivers and utilities.

    Of course, IBM is not the company sticking it to people here, that "honor" belongs to Microsoft and their utterly delusional paranoia that someone might steal a copy of Windows. You can hardly get a PC that doesn't come with Windows and by the time a new version of Windows comes out your hardware that is running the previous version is obsolete so there is very little reason to actually steal Windows.

    1. Re:IBM Thinkpad - another "for" vote by doughmein_dot_net · · Score: 1
      I just received a T30 at work this April. It's a pretty good laptop and it seems to do pretty much everything I need to do. I don't have any serious complaints with it, but it wasn't my first choice. I don't know if I'd spend my own money to buy one.

      If you're concerned about the lack of IBM-specific drivers and utilities after doing a re-install, and if you wish to buy a new copy of a Microsoft OS in which to run these utilities (your choice, really) then please remember that IBM has just about all of these drivers and utilities available for download on their support website. It might be a good idea to download these utilities and burn a CD-R now, just in case your laptop fails later.

      Not that I'm advocating that you buy or use a Microsoft OS, mind you. If it weren't for my company's use of Microsoft Outlook as a critical business app, I'd have installed Linux or BSD on that laptop months ago. :)

      Hope this helps...

      --
      Super ninja monkeys will one day rule the world!
    2. Re:IBM Thinkpad - another "for" vote by Coppertone · · Score: 1

      Well, you can call IBM up for a Recovery CD - but you will have to pay for the shipment.

      As long as you keep the recovery partition as it is, you should be able to run it - it's just a "hidden" fat partition - see this document for information on how to run it under LILO/GRUB.

      You can always use Partition Magic to back it up and store it somewhere safe (which I do!)

      You can use Service Partition repair diskette to reinitiate the partition.

      Hope this helps!

    3. Re:IBM Thinkpad - another "for" vote by peter+hoffman · · Score: 1

      This story has a happy ending. I eventually was directed to call 800-772-2227. I explained I am a developer who is going to mutilate the hard drive including the MBR and recovery partition. IBM is shipping the CDROMs to me at no charge as the system is under warranty.

  40. Powerbook with VirtualPC... no, really! by bethorphil · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I am also a professional programmer, so I can relate to your worries about development restrictions on a non-PC platform. I've been running VirtualPC on my second-hand TiBook for awhile now, and I can testify that it works quite well for PC development purposes.

    On a 667 Mhz laptop, i can use visual studio without complaints. Yes, it's slower than it would be on a P4 notebook. Let me tell you why I don't care: optimization! ...I find I write better code on trailing-edge hardware, because any speed issues become extremely obvious where the same code would SEEM fine on my Athlon box.

    But then again, maybe I'm a maniac. ;-)

    Anyway, based on my experience, I'd suggest that you not rule Apple out yet... Unless you're doing hardware drivers or video games, the emulation won't be a huge issue... And the reliability and design on these laptops are almost everything the zealots say they are :-). Check out the Connectix web site if you're interested in more info.

    --
    There are a thousand hacking at the branches of evil to one who is striking at the root.
  41. Virtual PC != Windows by eMartin · · Score: 2, Informative

    Virtual PC emulates an Intel based PC. Unless you actually install Windows, it has nothing to do with it, and you can install almost any other OS instead.

    There are exceptions, but that simply has to do with the OS not having drivers for the specific "hardware" Virtual PC emulates.

    1. Re:Virtual PC != Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Order the Mac with as much memory as it can take, you're going to be carrying a full copy of Windows in that emulatoed system."

  42. IBM store on eBay by bobbozzo · · Score: 2, Informative
    IBM has an eBay store, where they sell LOTS of laptops.

    You said you like their laptops, but they are expensive, so you might want to check it out. They sell both new and factory refurbished stuff there.

    --
    Nothing to see here; Move along.
    1. Re:IBM store on eBay by MonkeyDluffy · · Score: 1
      Thanks for the link. A question - is there a difference in quality between the T, A, R, and X series of notebooks? Most here seem to talk about their T series notebooks.


      -MDL

      --
      Happy meals fund terrorism
    2. Re:IBM store on eBay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for the link. A question - is there a difference in quality between the T, A, R, and X series of notebooks? Most here seem to talk about their T series notebooks.

      as a matter of fact, there is... you use the T, A, R, and X series when you want to extract maximum performance from your laptop; whereas if you are naturally more creative, you would choose something from the T, A, R, and C line.

  43. IBM Thinkpad R40 by cotcomsol · · Score: 3, Informative

    I just bought an IBM Thinkpad R40 a couple months ago, and all I can say is it's great. Works wonderfully out of the box with Linux and FreeBSD, is very fast (Pentium M), great battery life (around 4-5 hours), very nice screen, and great construction. I've been impressed. It's a big step up from my previous Compaq Presario, and not significantly more expensive.

    --
    -- "Big Brother is Watching..."
  44. That's easy . . . by Cokelee · · Score: 3, Insightful

    They don't exist.

    Next question . . .

  45. dude, don't get a Dell by austad · · Score: 1

    I've had a couple of Dells supplied by my employers over the last few years. In fact, I have one now. All of them have one thing in common... they suck. Drop them once, and it's pretty much guaranteed to break. Batteries rarely last me more than 9 months. And the sheer number of repairs I've seen our helpdesk have to do on them is insane (weird that the sony's never had hardware randomly fail unless dropped).

    Personally, I like the IBM's, even though they are ugly. HP Omnibook was a sweet little slimtop, but I don't think they make it anymore. My roomie has one and it's quite nice.

    Personally, out of all of the laptops I have now, and all that I've had in the past, my iBook is by far the nicest. Great battery life, and it contrary to what some have said, it does take a beating. I'll be getting a 12" powerbook to replace my aging iBook. But for work, I'm stuck with a crappy dell, and sadly, it's one of their top of the line ones.

    --
    Need Free Juniper/NetScreen Support? JuniperForum
    1. Re:dude, don't get a Dell by tf23 · · Score: 1

      Drop them once, and it's pretty much guaranteed to break.

      I've dropped by 8000 and 4200 only once or twice, that I can recall. No problems. I guess I'm lucky!

      Batteries rarely last me more than 9 months

      From my experience, this is definitely true. However, I recently read (sorry, I didn't bookmark the site) that the batteries, given full use, are only expected to last 6 months for laptops. Basically if you get a years use out of one, you've done good. My i8000 lasted a year, then it was worthless. The 4200 doesn't get as much use as the 8000, it's still going. Damn I wish I could find that link to the battery site/discussion.

  46. Re:Holy Crap by presearch · · Score: 1

    Your loss, his gain.

  47. Quality or Durability? by yancey · · Score: 1

    If you're looking for durable, go with the GoBook MAX. It's made out of very tough materials and you can just hose it down if it gets dirty. Otherwise, I can't help you since I bought a PowerBook.

    --
    Ouch! The truth hurts!
  48. Armada by floydman · · Score: 1

    I have an Compaq armada M700, with a 766 processor,256Ram. Like the IBM pal up there, "it never let me down" too. I have RH8 linux on it, and its so reliable. No problem with the hardware, the materials used are good (not excellent, but good)...
    Though i think the Thinkpad is better though(havent owned one, but i tried it, and its quite good.)

    --
    The lunatic is in my head
  49. I own one of 'em by QEDog · · Score: 1

    I'm own an Alienware Laptop, Area51m. If you compare prices around, you will see it is a really good deal if you want a powerful laptop. The tech support is great (they don't treat you like a moron or anything, and very helpful). The case itself doesn't feel very sturdy, but, i have been using mine for a year (yes, i was an early adopter), and I haven't have any problems. The only problem is the weight, it is almost 10 pounds (yikes). If you are looking for a very powerul desktop that looks like a laptop, it is a very good option.

    --
    "There is no teacher but the enemy."-Mazer Rackham
  50. Apple's titaniums are flimsy by 0x0d0a · · Score: 2, Informative

    I have a friend with a titanium...the case surrounding the LCD is flimsy and isn't stiff enough to support the screen. It's fairly easy to break the screen (which is quite expensive to replace).

  51. Give programmers slow computers by 0x0d0a · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You're an Apple zealot recommending a Microsoft product? :-)

    Seriously, I agree with the "give programmers slow computers" bit. To get the best code, give 'em slower computers with lots of fancy add-ons (multiple monitors, etc) so that you get efficient code that properly supports everything.

    1. Re:Give programmers slow computers by tf23 · · Score: 1

      Seriously, I agree with the "give programmers slow computers" bit.

      Damn, I'm glad I don't work for you! That'd drive me balistic having a slow machine (as mod_perl compiles in the background...)

    2. Re:Give programmers slow computers by ottothecow · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think the correct answer is give programmers slow computers with a godly compile cluster at their fingertips

      --
      Bottles.
  52. Just one problem with this vendor... by doughmein_dot_net · · Score: 1
    I'm not sure if it's a CGI bug or something, but whenever I try to load the vendor's page (listed above) and click the "Custom Configuration" tab to customize this laptop, I end up getting really funny results.

    Initially, after loading the page and clicking on the "Custom Configuration" tab, here are the prices I saw:

    • Retail Price $1383.00
    • Your Price $1259.00
    • You Save $124.00

    Now, without changing any of the drop-down boxes below, I clicked on the "recalculate" button, and here's what I saw:

    • Retail Price $1383.00
    • Your Price $2520.00
    • You Save $-1137.00

    Hmm. Fishy. It's nice that they allow me to customize the laptop, but if I end up having to pay more than $1200 extra for the benefit of customizing it, is it really worth it? Has anyone else run into this problem?

    --
    Super ninja monkeys will one day rule the world!
  53. Another vote for a Thinkpad... (for only $1149!) by SlashChick · · Score: 1

    I just thought I would throw in my two cents and also vote for the Thinkpad. I've administered well over 25 of them and continue to recommend them over just about any other laptop on the market. They are simply more well-built than pretty much every other laptop out there.

    For the people who are saying Thinkpads are too expensive, I just got word of a deal today on the Thinkpad T40. This is from PC Connection, which is an IBM reseller. (I don't work there, but my friend has a business account with them.) This deal just came in today: Thinkpad T40 for $1149

    If you do order from PC Connection, call and ask for Terri and she may be able to get you a little better of a deal than what is on the website. I tell you, if I had the money, I'd be buying a Thinkpad from them right now... but I don't, so I leave this gem of a deal for the rest of you to fight over. ;)

  54. Probably IBM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Well.. I use IBM ThinkPad R32.
    The size of it is just right. The performance, 1.7Ghz Mobile Pentium 4, is just good.
    Among american products, except for the Apple's, IBM seems to be the best. Dell can be good. But if you have an eye for products, it doesn't seem to be so good one. However AS of Dell is good. Gateway's is too heavy usually.

    However, there is some problem with IBM's ThinkPad.
    1. User support doesn't seem to be as good as that of Apple.
    2. ThinkPad seems to be weak to overheating. (I didn't compare it with other x86 notebooks, though. )
    When Windows crashes while it's being hibernated or shutdown, which happens often, it can be overheated in a crarrying case. Actually if you don't put it nto a carrying case then it's ok. But I think it would be better that IBM engineers provide solution to this problem. Some kind of independecy on MS Windows problem.
    Anyway, once overheating happens, sometimes response of Windows can be very very slow. (of course, the temperature is normal now. ), crashes more often.

    3. Strangely the video component malfunctions sometimes when WMP plays some video files.

    etc, etc.

    However, if you should develop programs for Windows platform, I will recommend the ThinkPad.

    Sony's notebook is not so good as it looks.
    The network component usually has problems, etc.

  55. Get the Dell M60/50 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    and get an extended warranty. Actually, get the warranty no matter what you buy. FWIW, when you work with enough of any brand of laptop, you'll see lots of failures - and I've worked at large Mac, Toshiba, Compaq, Dell, and IBM shops.

  56. Re:why Porche of course ;) - Now clickable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  57. Avoid Toshiba by Nice2Cats · · Score: 1
    If you are going to use Linux, or even going to think about considering the possibility you might think about using Linux, avoid Toshiba. I have a Satellite S2670DVD and even friendly, clever SuSE 8.1 was a major pain to install - I still don't have the graphics system running optimal. The PCMCIA port is on the right hand side, so if you are right handed and use a mouse, you keep hitting the network cable. The DVD drive is regularly confused with a starting airplane. The list goes on -- just trying to find out which graphics processor the thing has was a quest in itself -- but what it comes down to is that I can't see buying another Toshiba, ever.

    Just this weekend, I had the chance to see my brother-and-law's new 12" Apple powerbook. I don't agree with the BSD license, I think the prices Apple is asking for its software are insane, and the think took forever to boot, but oh my God was it beautiful. The whole machine gives the impression that somebody actually sat down and thought about how the thing would be used, instead of sort of throwing the pieces together on the basis of what is the least expensive.

    I can't see buying a desktop computer from Apple -- standard x86 parts and Linux serve me too well for so little -- but if our laptop were fall on the floor, a total write off, destroyed, shattered into a thousand pieces, I'd think very seriously about an iBook. If you want something like an Apple, get an Apple.

  58. Try HP. Really. by shadowxtc · · Score: 1

    I'd say more, but without personal EM-shielding the flames will hurt :(

  59. Virtual PC by chrysalis · · Score: 1

    To get the best of two worlds, buy an iBook and Virtual PC.

    Recent releases of Virtual PC are working amazingly well. Yes, it's an emulation, but no, it's not slow. Visual Studio runs flawlessly if this is what you need.

    --
    {{.sig}}
  60. Oh, the one with the built-in coffee collector... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Evo N800c is, IMHO, one of the worst laptop designs ever for people who do any sort of field work.

    Sure, the screen is great, it's fast, etc, but the metal rim around the touchpad is hideous and it has two major design flaws:

    • It has no built-in serial ports (essential for anyone who has to set up routers and stuff on the field)
    • The bus linkage to the dock is on the underside, and it is PERMANENTLY OPEN WITHOUT COVERS!

    The upshot of this is that it is only too easy to short-circuit your laptop on a dirty or cluttered desk (a few drops of liquid or a paper clip have been known to do the trick).

    My colleagues have dumped the docks, harrassed Purchasing for USB-to-Serial adapters and sealed the dock connector with waterproof-glue duct tape.

    There's PC industrial design for you.

    Oh, and we have no end of trouble trying to run Linux on the darn things, too.

  61. Get a Powerbook and use Virtual PC... by cymantic · · Score: 1
    I develop stuff for windows and use Virtual PC on a powerbook, it's not lightening quick, but it's usable. I haven't used Visual Studio (.Net Framework/Vim is all you really need, SharpDevelop runs ok) but others have used some intensive apps...

    Reading around it even looks like there are those at Microsoft who've considered getting a powerbook too

    With a wireless network, RemoteDesktop/VNC you can access any other PC resources you need.

    Now you only have to convince your boss. Good Luck!

  62. Why not use Virtual PC by TobascoKid · · Score: 1

    I would buy one today except that I am a professional programmer and MUST use the same platform my compiler targets: Intel.

    I take it there must be some good reason why you can't use a cross compiler (like you're using Microsoft Dev Studio and you don't want to admit it to the /. crowd - which is understandable). Have you thought about getting a mac and using Virtual PC? Performance would suck a bit, but surely it would be worth it so that you'd have a Mac? :-)

    Tk

    --
    At some point, somewhere, the entire internet will be found to be illegal.
  63. Fujitsu quality by amlai · · Score: 1

    I cannot say the same. The paint job is not quite up to the standard of Sony's. They frquently chip off and I have seen that on a few Fujitsu notebooks.

  64. Re:Oh, the one with the built-in coffee collector. by toast0 · · Score: 1

    I have an Evo n800c. It came with a rubber dohickey jammed in the expansion bay, i find this effectively bars paper clips from causing problems. This is an improvement over previous Compaq laptops where the expansion bay was on the back, with no possibility of covering it.

    The lack of serial ports is not necessarily a design flaw. There is only so much room on the back of the device, so compaq dropped the serial port. If you need a serial terminal, you should be able to find a large number of _really_ old laptops with serial ports that are capable of running miniterm (or whatever suits your fancy), for instance, I've got two laptops with 386s that make great serial terminals.

  65. Re:Oh, the one with the built-in coffee collector. by toast0 · · Score: 1

    oops, forgot to comment on running linux on them.

    I had no significant trouble running Linux on my evo n800c. I installed debian (using vmware to avoid making a boot cd), upgraded to unstable, compiled the kernel with vesa framebuffer support, and went from there. Yes, ACPI is broken, that's what you get from Compaq... there are fairly simple ways to fix that. You can also choose to use the radeon drivers for X, but there are some issues with closing the lid then (i think those are fixable too, i just didn't care).

  66. Re:Oh, the one with the built-in coffee collector. by JLester · · Score: 1

    Linux runs fine on ours (Debian). We also use the USB-Serial converters.

    Jason

    --
    "FORMAT C:" - Kills bugs dead!
  67. Ways to get Thinkpads for cheap by John+Harrison · · Score: 5, Informative
    1. Find an IBM employee. They can give you access to the "friends and family" store. Sometimes the discounts are amazing.

    2. Become a stockholder. Stockholders also get access to discounts.

    3. eBay. The IBM store on eBay has some sweet deals.

    If you save enough money you can go out and buy a cheap iBook as well. Have the best of both worlds.

    1. Re:Ways to get Thinkpads for cheap by mosch · · Score: 1

      Or just pay retail. They're not expensive or overpriced machines, so there's really no need to jump through hoops to get a few points off the price.

    2. Re:Ways to get Thinkpads for cheap by John+Harrison · · Score: 1

      While I agree with you, and encourage everyone to buy Thinkpads at retail price, the person asking the question seemed to think that they were too expensive. I think they are willing to jump through hoops.

    3. Re:Ways to get Thinkpads for cheap by op00to · · Score: 3, Informative

      A few points? I got ~$500 off the current (As of 7/9) price for a T40 with a Pentium M 1.3 with my stockholder discount. I'd like the $500 thank you very much.

    4. Re:Ways to get Thinkpads for cheap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How much stock do you need to hold to qualify for the discount ?

    5. Re:Ways to get Thinkpads for cheap by kruczkowski · · Score: 1

      Sockholder discount?!?

      can you post more info on that?

      --
      hmm... for fun I enjoy launching DDoS attacks against 127.87.42.5
    6. Re:Ways to get Thinkpads for cheap by ldspartan · · Score: 2, Interesting

      ... I get little pamphlets in the mail from IBM every quarter or so, with deals and a URL.

      Maybe thats just me though.

    7. Re:Ways to get Thinkpads for cheap by Yottabyte84 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How much stock do you need to have? Can I get this kind of discount with a single share? or do I need like a hundred?

    8. Re:Ways to get Thinkpads for cheap by John+Harrison · · Score: 1

      I get the pamphlet mentioned about. Since I am an employee I just recycle it and use the employee friends and family store. I looked through my stuff to see if I have an old one and can't find one. I also looked on both the internal and external websites and couldn't find any info. Several family members have purchased laptops through the friends and family store and were very happy with the deals they got. I also have no idea how much stock you have to own to get a discount. Sorry I am not bunches of help.

    9. Re:Ways to get Thinkpads for cheap by John+Harrison · · Score: 1

      That should be pamplet mentioned above.

  68. DELL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    DELL Laptops SUCK! Please don't ever buy one.

    My P2-233 is still faster than the piece of junk 600MHz I bought from them.

  69. I use Acers by dregs · · Score: 1

    The acer tm800 is much under rated as a laptop, we pay ~2700 AUS$ ~ $1500US for a 1.3Mhz Pentium Processor M rpoicess 512Mb ram, and a DVD/CD writre combo drive, with wireless etc.

    All in all not a bad laptop for the price.

    I currently use an Acer TM610, and its great, I love it

  70. Re:Holy Crap by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

    We weren't making sand candles or incense.

  71. Prefer debugging on a virtual machine by Eustace+Tilley · · Score: 1
    Advantages of developing and debugging on a virtual machine include:
    • Ability to save the entire state of a machine for test cases
    • testing installation on a "previously virgin" machine
    • running as "end-user" rather than "developer"
    • running multiple versions of an application concurrently on independent virtual machines
    • testing under multiple versions of OS
    • Many of the advantages of remote debugging within a single machine


    Are you writing device drivers or applications?
    1. Re:Prefer debugging on a virtual machine by Flying-Cow-Man · · Score: 1

      These are all valid advantages, but I had assumed, by the way the poster spoke, that they were writing low level code. If the code were abstract enough then it could, to a large extent, be debugged on any architecture (In fact, it would be a testament to the quality of the code).

      There is little high level work today that cannot be developed concurrently on multiple architectures, given the right development environment.

      --
      Don't knock HTML email. It makes my life easier, since I /don't/ _have_ to "find" STUPID *workarounds
    2. Re:Prefer debugging on a virtual machine by cait56 · · Score: 1

      If the intent is for the laptop to match the deployment environment, then he should be buying the same crappy laptop(s) that the customers will use.

      If the intent is to test stuff that will be run in a general Windows environment, then emulation is a very valid testing strategy. For one thing it makes it very possible to *switch* between multiple Windows versions quickly. Real machines don't do that anywhere near as well.

      If the intent is to target a Linux/Unix/BSD type environment, then you shouldn't care what the processor is anyway. You should be developing for multiple architectures, as the prior post stated. If you are testing specific peripherals, that is different. But then you should be matching the target environment more than a laptop will probably allow anyway.

  72. I love my Dell by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Yes, it's big and heavy.

    But it's got EVERYTHING internal (no need for external bays) and a beautiful 15" screen with resolution that is far higher than Apple's 15" laptop LCDs. Runs every game I have quite well.

    It's an Inspiron 8200. Yes, it's not the most portable, but Dell's primary market is businesses. It doesn't matter if the unit is a little heavy if a bulk of your "traveling" is from your cube to the conference room. (Or in the case of where I work, half of the engineers have Dells that move between the docking station on their desk and the benchtop in the lab multiple times per day.)

    That said - If you have the money, Thinkpads are the way to go. They are the most durable laptops on the market by far. (Unless you go into the "ruggedized" market, where units like the Panasonic Toughbook reign supreme.) If cost is an issue, Dell makes excellent laptops, especially the Inspiron 8000 series.

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    1. Re:I love my Dell by op00to · · Score: 1

      If you're looking for a desktop replacement, you have a point. (Though almost all the Dell Inspirons we have gotten in the past year or so have needed some sort of service, and 0 of the IBM's needed anything...Obviously YMMV) If you're looking for a truly portable computer, you probably don't need to have a CD burner attached and running at all times. I'd gladly take an external CD/DVD drive if it saved me a bit of weight.

    2. Re:I love my Dell by gooberguy · · Score: 2, Informative

      This might be what you are looking for. Its a low power C3, perfect for mobile computers. The thing has no drives except for a compact flash reader and laptop hard drive. This thing is on my wish list.

      --


      Karma: Meh (Mostly from meh.)
    3. Re:I love my Dell by JesseDeadArm · · Score: 0

      what's your screen's resolution? mine is 1280x854, and i think your missing the point on resolution, as with alot of PC users you think higher resolution=better. i have a PBG4 DVI with the higher res screen. (it jumped from 1152 by something in previous models.) and if the resolution were any smaller i would be getting head ache. I think this is perfect, i'm glad i spent the extra for a laptop that considers things like this. it's called R&D.

      --
      learn how to mod.
    4. Re:I love my Dell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That thing is a piece of shit and not worth much more than $300.

  73. Compaq by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I used to work in a computer sales center.

    Compaq consistently has the worst quality rep of any PC manufacturer. (Except Packard Smell... Thank God they're gone. Even eMachines is better than Compaq.) We routinely had Compaq laptops come in for service with displays that had simply stopped working.

    Toshiba used to be excellent, but like you, I've heard that they've gone downhill over the past few years.

    Dell's quality seems to oscillate every few years. Back when I was in school, all of their laptops and desktops were utter shite. The desktops we've been getting at work lately have had AMAZING build quality and impressive design. (The latest ones, at least the latest Precisions, have completely screwless designs and quite well designed ducted cooling.) I have an Inspiron 8200 and it's one of the best laptops I've ever used. The only complaint I have about it is the lack of a display blanking key, a feature I miss from my old TI Travelmate 7100.

    Sony Vaios seem to always be overpriced and have all of their accessories external.

    IBM Thinkpads are also pricey, but well worth the money if you can afford them. Thinkpads are built like tanks. We NEVER had a Thinkpad less than 4-5 years old come in for service at my campus store when I worked there, and those that did come in after 4-5 years of life were mostly in because of software problems.

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    1. Re:Compaq by JLester · · Score: 1

      I agree with you regarding Compaq laptops (their Deskpros and Proliants have always been good) until the last year or so. They've gotten much better. My department supports about 2000 Compaq computers, but was standardized on Thinkpads until the last year.

      Jason

      --
      "FORMAT C:" - Kills bugs dead!
  74. Stay away by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

    Unless they've changed, Alienware is one of those manufacturers that sticks a desktop version of the P4 into their machines. ALL of them. I know the Area 51m is such a machine.

    i.e. say goodbye to battery life and good thermal performance.

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  75. I like powernotebooks. by BoomerSooner · · Score: 1

    Very sweet stuff at cheap prices.

    Power Notebooks

    Someone else linked to them the other day on slashdot and I was very impressed. Especially the 17" one for $1700 !!! That's only $300 more than I paid for my 900MHz iBook 12.1"!!!!

  76. Latitude C640 by Rudy+Rodarte · · Score: 1

    I work for Dell
    Now that I have that out of the way, you should look at the Latitude C640. That thing is a rock, just about the right size and you can upgrade the heck out of it. Then again, when I goto Fry's, I drool over those iBooks, but they are a bit out of range for me. :(
    The IBM thinkpads I've seen all belonged to friends of mine. They were pretty old(circa 1996), but sturdy and still alive and kicking.

    1. Re:Latitude C640 by KefkaFloyd · · Score: 1

      $999 for the 800MHz model doesn't seem to bad for me, but I woudl go for the 900MHz model and then buy a 512MB stick of RAM from a third party (Apple rapes for RAM).

      --

      Conglom-O: We Own You (TM).
    2. Re:Latitude C640 by adturner · · Score: 1

      Oh god no. My company standardized on the Dell C640 and I just got one. Almost every day I seriously think about going back to my old IBM 600X. The cheap plastic case of the Dell is exactly that- cheap plastic. The flex on the palm rest above the cdrom drive is horrible. The damned thing runs so hot, I have to put a book between it and my lap. The onboard Winmodem (not every hotel has ethernet) doesn't work under Linux. Suspend/Standby doesn't seem to work under Linux either, although I haven't given up quite yet. Honestly, the screen is nice, but I'm still not used to using a touchpad (it has a trackpoint like the 600X but it doesn't feel right for some reason).

      The people who run XP on the thing are always complaning about how unstable it is. Not sure if it's our IT group fucking things up or some driver issue. RH9 is stable and runs well, other then the damned suspend issue (enabling DRI under X seems to make things worse). Video is accellerated under X (DRI works), but isn't impressive, about 525fps w/ glxgears.

      Performance is pretty decent though- definately blows away my old P3-450 IBM. Battery life is about 2.5hrs under real world use which I'm happy with. I'm just glad that the company bought it for me, had I spent the money on it, I would of been very disappointed.

    3. Re:Latitude C640 by Rudy+Rodarte · · Score: 1

      I can get Mandrake running on it just nice. And yea, I'll leave the winmodem to the 31337 guys. And the suspend problem, well ya. Not much I can say there. The network works well though. I haven't (and never would) try XP on it, so I can't comment on that. Most of the support issues I get are all software, so I'd check down that avenue before anything hardware related.

  77. IBM and Apple by i0wnzj005uck4 · · Score: 1

    I won't repeat the things others have said about laptops from both Apple and IBM, although I will give you a few anecdotes:

    1) I'm an IT guy for a small medical company. Every so often we pick up used laptops for cheap -- we're an NGO, so that counts as an in-kind donation -- and usually, they're IBM's. Crazier still, these laptops that were build sometimes close to a DECADE ago still work fine, and their screens have no burned-out pixels. I hate Windows at this point (having made the switch to Mac OSX and Linux, and never looked back), but if you have no choice about using an intel-based laptop, go with IBM. Also, IBM is one of the few laptop makers that put the OS in some kind of internal rom, so that if the system crashes on one of the laptops without a CD Rom drive, you can use the bios to reinstall the OS without external media.

    2) iBooks rock. I own two. I bought the first one after watching a friend accidentally knock his out a second story window and onto pavement. The battery shot out, but when he put the battery back in and dusted it off the only problem it had was a number of new scratches on the outside. Yes, they're really that durable. However, my new iBook 800 just had its modem port die, and it's just over 6 months old.

    Also, using Virtual PC is a perfect way of having a sturdy laptop and a decent OS (I installed it specifically for KazAa...), but I don't recommend running it on any iBook, period, regardless of what the docs say. You absolutely need a G4. Period. If you're doing development, the slowness of VPC on a G3 under OS X will amaze you.

    Lastly, Apple has worldwide coverage on their laptops if you opt for the extra 250$ AppleCare plan (3 years). Myself, I bought both iBooks in the states and am moving to Japan in a month, which happens to have apple stores in Tokyo, so I'm very excited about this. I don't know what IBM has in the way of warranties, but I've been to their office in Makuhari in Japan and I know they're pretty much established worldwide as well.

    --
    - Cloud
    1. Re:IBM and Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The only diff between a G3 and a G4 is AltiVec (which Apple calls Velocity Engine), and I'm not sure that VPC is compiled or tuned to use those libraries (you have to write your code specifically to use AltiVec).

      Having said that, VPC probably runs fine on an iBook loaded with memory, which is probably the real culprit from a slow-running OSX system.

      BTW, I am in the process of switching my wife from her old Compaq to my old TiBook; now I use a 17" PowerBook to develop software every day...but fortunately Java pays my bills, so it really doesn't matter which platform I choose. I switched to the Mac before switching was cool...1999, when I first heard about OSX...and you're never going to see me going back!

    2. Re:IBM and Apple by Coppertone · · Score: 1

      Oh, Thinkpad is big in Japan, and worldwide coverage comes free. Just pop it into any odd IBM PC office (you can find it in pc support website) and they will fix it if it is under warranty!

  78. Eurocom Laptop .. by MadX · · Score: 2, Interesting

    http://www.eurocom.ca

    'Nuf said ..

  79. Wouldn't get an Apple anyway... by UnrefinedLayman · · Score: 1

    I just purchased a 12" iBook last week. I can't stand the bloody thing. The Apple store that kindly installed the extra 512 MB RAM (to make up for the pathetic 128 that it comes with) and the airport card managed to strip screws inside as well.

    The thing is just a toy. It's a toy laptop that pretends to be a real computer. It's made of plastic and the world's lightest metal, which just so happens to be the world's weakest metal as well, as evidenced by the Apple store's great care of the internal screws.

    It's been an unfortunate 12 days, and now I can't even send it back because they have a whopping 10 day return policy. 10 days? Even Dell provides 30. I feel completely ripped off because I don't like using the damned thing and can't get rid of it.

    If anyone wants a 12 day old 900 MHz iBook with 640 MB RAM, Airport, 40 GB hard drive, and the original packaging, all on the cheap, let me know. Otherwise, it's off to eBay with this thing. I'm willing to let it go for three or four hundred less than what I paid at this point. I can get an Intel laptop that I'd be a lot more comfortable with for that anyway. No offense to any Apple fans. I just can't use the thing.

    1. Re:Wouldn't get an Apple anyway... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm on my second 12" iBook, and I have never had a problem with either of them. My original 500MHz with CD-ROM bought in June 2001 was sold on eBay in December 2002 for two thirds what I paid for it. I now have an 800MHz with the Combo Drive.

      Mine goes with me everywhere when I'm on the clock doing my system integrator thing, and it does all I ask of it, without weighing me down too much or draining its battery too fast. It rides in my backpack with my other tools, inside a modestly-padded sleeve case. 800MHz is even fast enough to run Win98 in emulation with Virtual PC, for the rare occasion that I need to do that. But I guess I've just been imagining doing all that work with it, since it's just a toy.

      The question that lingers in my mind, though, is why the fuck would you buy something without trying it out first?

      Oh well, go ahead and put it on eBay, you'll get back most of what you paid for the iBook and you can go buy yourself some shitty Wintel that will be a doorstop in a few months.

    2. Re:Wouldn't get an Apple anyway... by Sarreq+Teryx · · Score: 1

      how cheap? I wouldn't mind having an ibook, it'd be my first laptop ever. my email is visible but obsfucated

  80. DELL Inspiron 8500 with WUXGA and Red Hat 9.0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been comparing notebooks for some time and decided for a Dell Inspiron 8500 with WUXGA display. I put Red Hat 9.0 on it and all I can say is: That thing rocks!!! The display resolution(1920x1200) is awesome and the quality of the display is better than anything I've seen before.
    I paid something like $1600 after the instant rebate and after I insisted that I wanted the machine without Windows bundled and won't pay for it they gave me a $100 merchandise credit. That's how things are supposed to be! I've put Red Hat 9.0 on it and now I have a notebook that absolutely rocks for an optimal performance/price ratio. I haven't had any problems with it so far and do I care if the case is made of plastic instead of brushed magnesium or whatever? no!

  81. Re:Try HP. Really. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As someone who used to work in HP's mobile computing division, I would agree, but only to a point. The Quanta made HP's were/are great machines. Some of the Compal stuff was crap. The best price / quality stuff was codenamed "Zinfandel". I think that is marketed as the 'z' series. Good stuff.

  82. Are you on CRACK!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jumpin jeesuz on a pogo stick - the iBook is made from excellent materials? Hello, are you insane? Its made out of friggin PLASTIC, just like everyother laptop out there. Idiot, you don't deserve an intel-based laptop - go buy your crappy CrapInTosh i-Crook CrapTop 'computer', its made just for shitforbrains just like you.

  83. But of course! by fm6 · · Score: 1

    And there's no shortage of jobs to choose from!

  84. Re:Oh, the one with the built-in coffee collector. by mosch · · Score: 1

    Or you can do what I did, and just buy a USB->serial adapter. They're cheap and plentiful, and let's face facts... USB ports are much more useful than serial ports for 99% of the purchasers.

  85. One mouse button is superior on laptops. by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    I use a full three button mouse with my Powerbook when it's docked.

    However, using a laptop standalone I really prefer having one mouse button. I find it a lot easier to chord the mouse button using keys than constantly having my thumb reach for an annoyingly placeed second button, or hitting one when I meant to hit the other (which is what happens when both are convieniently placed).

    Seriously, even Windows laptops could benefit by just having one button and chording the others.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  86. Dell's are bad? by Snafoo · · Score: 1

    Are they really as cheap and flimsy as all that? Based on previous happy experiences with Dell workstations, I've recommended their laptops to friends, and now I fear my ass is on the line. :)
    Oh well, that's what I get for trying to look omniscient.

    --
    - undoware.ca
    1. Re:Dell's are bad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know what they're like now, but back in 1999-2000 at my last job they were "the standard" for my company, and I had sufficient bad experiences with them to forever equate "Dell laptop" with "cheap piece of shit to be avoided."

  87. Re:Try HP. Really. by shadowxtc · · Score: 1

    That would make perfect sense. My recommendation was made based off the fact myself and two friends have all had a great experience with our Pavilion ze5170 notebooks. I bought one last year and made them switch too. The only downside is that at the time it was standard to use desktop CPUs in notebooks :P.

  88. Well by aarku · · Score: 1

    CodeWarrior can target for Intel, and is available for Mac and PC... So buy the Mac you want and get CodeWarrior... if you need to test it on the Mac boot up VirtualPC.

  89. IBM Thinkpad by Coppertone · · Score: 1

    *Disclaimer* I am an IBM employee.

    Having said that I always recommend a Thinkpad, even though I didn't work for them before. Okay, they may be black, they may be builky, but the screen is really nice and probably the best keyboard in the market. Most of the laptop are pretty much 90% Intel but then it is all those little touches that count. You should have a look at the 15" screen that exists on A series thinkpad...... They are nice (I am using it to write this reply!)

    I and using a A31 at the moment that I've got from EPP (IBM's employee purchase plan)... The price is okay but due to the UK tax law here they can't offer employees much better than most shops out there. My previous laptop is a A20m and I have abused it for 3 years (literatlly - dropping it on the floor, breaking the USB connector, etc). There are cracks and stuff but everything still works great as day one when I passed it onto my cousin.

    I may be biased, but trust me, IBM Thinkpad is probably the most durable ones you can find out there.

  90. Install Linux, Problem Solved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Linux runs on both systems, and you can cross compile. So really, what is the problem with buying a Mac?

    1. Re:Install Linux, Problem Solved by Sarreq+Teryx · · Score: 1

      if he's developing for windows? I know it doesn't say so, but it's possible.

  91. Apple-Quality Intel Laptop by sharkey · · Score: 1

    Microsoft Works
    Slashdot Grammar
    Military Intelligence

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  92. Asus M3000N by inburito · · Score: 1

    Not necessarily the most well known brand, but definitely high quality and an excellent price/performance ratio. Have been using one for about a month now and really have no complaints.

    Besides, Where else can you get a brand new centrino for a base price of 1300usd? And did I mention that it does 1400x1050..

    Try their website here. I think that at least www.rjtech.com sells them in usa and you can configure it to be pretty much what you want.

  93. Go with Thinkpad by blate · · Score: 1

    You get what you pay for... I've been a fan of Thinkpads for a long time. They're very sturdy (for laptops) and last forever if you don't drop them on the driveway too many times :)

    Their prices have come down recently... you can get a pretty good system for about $2000 and a fully-tricked-out monster for around $3000. When you consider the relative power of the newer Intel mobile chips, this is a bargain compared to Apple's offerings.

    The thinkpad hardware seems quite standardized these days. I know guys who got Linux and FreeBSD running on theirs (either stand-alone or dual-boot with Windows) with minimal trouble.

    The R series (one of the newer lines) doesn't seem as sturdy or robust as the A and T series. The T series is their "corporate" line, and they last forever... they cost a little more for the same features but they're lighter, more compact, and more rugged.

    I have an A22p that I bought in 2001... The dog has knocked it off the coffee table about a dozen times and it's no worse for wear. A couple of the screws that hold the LCD into the back of the computer got a little loose after about a year, but I tightened them down and haven't had any further issues.

    Definitely stay away from Sony and Dell... Sony's are notorious for hardware incompatibility issues and both Sony's and Dells are rather delicate, particularly the "consumer-grade" models.

    One note... I paid a couple hundred dollars extra for the 1600x1200 15" screen on my laptop. There are two problems with this... First, running at 1600x1200 I can't read text on the screen anymore unless I use "fonts for the blind". Second, the box is just a little too big to comfortably fit into most laptop bags. It squeezes into my Targus (?) laptop backpack, but barely, and I had to remove some of the protective foam from the top and bottom to get him in there.

    Another tip: choose a laptop that has an "accessory bay" that can accept a second battery (to suppliment the main battery). These are very handy on long trips or long progress meetings. Mine gives me about an extra 2.5 hours of battery life. Some of the Dells and others can actually take *2* extra batteries, if you're willing to lug around the extra weight.

    Good luck!

  94. I sort of had this same problem by herko_cl · · Score: 1

    It was solved by buying a cheap iBook (which is now, by far, my favorite computer), and using Remote Desktop Connection to operate a desktop Win-XP Pro PC.

    Microsoft bashing aside, RDP works well enough for me, and it solved my problem perfectly too: badass Intel/AMD hardware inside my little iBook (Virtual PC on this thing is SLOW). Of course, this way I have all of the advantages of having both computers.

    This solution is certainly not for everyone, but for me it works like a charm.

    Cheers,
    Jorge

    --
    No .sig for you! ONE YEAR!
  95. Cross compile by panZ · · Score: 1

    I'm an embedded programmer, I compile for MANY different target platforms and BSPs. I use my Powerbook as my IDE and CVS environment full time, cross compiling for any platform that uses a GNU compiler (which is most ARM, MIPS and x86 platforms) and serial debugging/printf connection if its needed. I can cross compile to many systems and those than I can't, I have a headless clunker box and VNC or I use VirtualPC to compile or debug on the occasion tools are only available for Windows/PC (just like I used net meeting and my windows laptop if a customer provided me with a fully configured host platform). In the embedded space, tools are never made for the exact host platform you're using so you learn to be flexible anyway. I imagine if you are only in the x86 PC Windows space, you could do all of your dev on the Mac and use VPC for testing if your Apps aren't processor or I/O intensive.

    --
    --Let's hack root on 127.0.0.1 --panZ
  96. Remote Desktop Connection by mbowles · · Score: 1

    If you are using development tools native to Windows maybe you could run them on a remote machine and use RDC from your Apple laptop. Microsoft provides a free download of their RDC product at: http://www.microsoft.com/Mac/DOWNLOAD/MISC/RDC.asp

    This offers a less expensive alternative to VirtualPC

  97. avoid the name brands entirely by moofmoofmoof · · Score: 1

    Go for a 3'rd party laptop. They're often made in the same originating factories, are quite a bit less expensive, and have some cutting-edge features. I've had great dealings with PowerNotebooks -- take a look at their 17" widescreen TiBook clone. -moof

  98. Just got a Dell, wish I bought an IBM by Swamp · · Score: 1

    I recently got a Dell inspiron 8500. It feels flimsey, it has a terrible keyboard and it freezes (i.e. stops working completely) after a few hours of use. I'm still trying to get Dell tech support to replace it.

    Although the spec is great for the price, I wish I paid more and got an IBM Thinkpad.

  99. So tired of marketspeak... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just bought a certified pre-owned T30

    I know the whole 'pre-owned' thing has been done for a long time, but today I just feel like commenting on it.

    Why do companies feel the need to "church up" words to try to fool people. Just fucking call it "used" and deal with it.

    For sale: Pre-owned dog food-- sold in a convenient, neatly-formed lump. As an added bonus, I'll throw in the blades of grass that are clinging to it.

  100. Refurbished Thinkpad by yomoma · · Score: 1

    I got a refurbished Thinkpad T22 (900Mhz P3) for $995 in January. Try getting an equivalent powerbook for that much.

    I have friends who have had refurbished T20s for the past 2 years, used for about 10 hours a day, every day, with no problems.

    Check IBM's ebay store or http://www.tigerdirect.com

    1. Re:Refurbished Thinkpad by valkraider · · Score: 1

      You would have to give more specs than just the processor speed for people to find an equivalent. But just based on your comment, I would say the 800Mhz iBook is at least equivalent for $999. True - it is not a Powerbook. But all the Powerbooks are better equipped - so the closest equivalent is the iBook.

  101. Apple-Quality Intel Laptops? by vonkas · · Score: 1

    12" iBook quality is only so-so - thermal problems, screen backlight and the screen hinge. Thaey VERY hard to work on too. I look after some for clients. The old roundish ones don't go wrong much. The 17" iBook sofar has been great - none of the probs as with 12"s. In PC laptops I prefer Thinkpads - not the consumer series (i-series etc) though. The older R31s are pretty reliable and feel solid - they are being discounted in this country - $2000 AUS.

  102. Make friends with an IBM Employee ... by dustpuppy · · Score: 1
    Every IBM Employee has access to staff discounts on the IBM website which for laptops is about 20% off the normal web price!


    And best of all, they are allowed to offer that price to friends and family.

    1. Re:Make friends with an IBM Employee ... by lkaos · · Score: 1

      Ha, I wish it was 20%....

      It's not even close to 20%.

      --
      int func(int a);
      func((b += 3, b));
  103. Virtual PC vs VMWare (veering off-topic) by Jaeger · · Score: 1

    As the parent comment suggests, VMWare creates a virtual machine, which means it uses the protected memory features of the processor to create the illusion that the guest operating system is running on a full, unencumbered computer. When one runs Windows under Linux using VMWare, Windows actually gets to run x86 instructions directly on the processor. But whenever it attempts to access hardware directly, VMWare grabs control, does whatever needs to be done to convince Windows that the right thing is happening, and Windows doesn't know any better.

    Virtual PC, however, creates an entire x86 processor in software, so it can run on any arbitrary hardware. It obviously takes more than one machine instruction to emulate one in software, so software will run much slower, as opposed to only slightly slower in the case of VMWare.

  104. Re:Holy Crap by 1010011010 · · Score: 1


    Mooooooo

    --
    Napster-to-go says "Fill and refill your compatible MP3 player", which is a lie. It's not MP3. It's WMA with DRM.
  105. This from a former iBook owner ... by pvera · · Score: 1

    I switched from XP Pro to an iBook 600 with Jaguar on September last year, then replaced it with a Ti Book 867 (also Jaguar) this past April. I totally feel your pain with the issue of picking an Intel laptop.

    If I had to buy an Intel laptop it would have to be either an IBM ThinkPad or a Toshiba. IBM builds their laptops like tanks and don't waste on asthetics. "ThinkBricks" are very solid and look like hand-sized versions of the 2001 monolith. My kid once stood on a closed ThinkBrick and he did not crack the screen, even if at the time he was 35 pounds.

    Of course, you may want to consider using Virtual PC 6. I have it on my Titanium Powerbook and runs Windows 2000 Pro without issues (I need it for SQL Server's enterprise manager and the query analyzer). I tried VPC on the iBook 600 with 384MB and it was too slow, with the Ti Book 867 it has 512MB so it runs much smoother.

    --
    Pedro
    ----
    The Insomniac Coder
  106. IBM T-series by slaker · · Score: 1

    Soak it up, pay the money, and get an IBM T-series notebook. They're both sturdy and reasonably light, and have the best mix of horsepower and battery life I've found, given their class. At one point I was responsible for several hundred of them, and they were much better, reliability-wise than Compaq and Toshiba models that were also inflicted on me.

    Dell is OK if you don't have money, but frankly, there's nothing in their lineup that matches the "lightweight desktop replacement" that is the T-series, and the most compelling thing about their products to me is that there's quite a bit more parts interchange than is possible with most brands; that's hardly compelling for an individual (dell goes for higher-end graphics chips than the likes of IBM, too. For a business machine, I doubt that's a good thing).

    The truth is, you'll never be able to match ALL the things that Apple is good at with one x86 machine. Most particularly, battery life on the iBooks I'm familiar with seems to be much better than even brand-new units from the land of the Pentium. I just know if I had to blow a huge wad of cash on a notebook PC, it'd be an IBM T-series. From my experience, I'd have to say they're worth the cash.

    Off-topic, sorta, but...

    I know a laptop repair guy who spits every time someone says "Toshiba". Ususually into a cup, sometimes a handkerchief. At first I thought he chewed tobacco but when I asked him about it, he told me it's a matter of principle. Oddly enough, I understood completely.

    --
    -- I wanna decide who lives and who dies - Crow T. Robot, MST3K
  107. I have a Apple Powerbook and an IBM Thinkpad by arete · · Score: 1

    The Powerbook is a G3 Pismo, the Thinkpad a 233Mhz 600E. So neither is fast, but both are nice. The Apple's slightly newer.

    I love OSX. I love Apple. There are features of the Thinkpad that make me like it better. This amazed me. For instance, the texture of the body plastic near the keyboard is PERFECT. Much better than the G3. Of course, it has a couple extra mouse buttons. It's incredibly easy to swap the HDs, even when they're still warm, so I can have an easy multiple boot setup. (I prefer this to a partitioning scheme because I HAVE several HDs, and I don't have a single much-larger one.) IBMs latch for the PCMCIA slot is superior.

    (These are the machines I use every day)

    I've seen a lot of laptops, and I definitely think IBM is the PC-way to go.

    --
    Looking for freelance Actionscript (Flash/Flex) or ColdFusion work and/or freelance developers. Email me, put Slashdot
  108. LOL by kinnell · · Score: 1
    I've picked up two used Panasonic Toughbooks on eBay and they've been attention-getters ever since.

    No shit? I bet if you open one of them up in starbucks, all the customers would run to the window to see which nearby building was about to blow up. Do they come packaged with a black suit and sinister shades?

    --
    If I seem short sighted, it is because I stand on the shoulders of midgets
  109. Thinkpad and Tibook by smoon · · Score: 1

    I've got one of each. The IBM Thinkpad T20 was the nicest laptop I've ever used. Until I got the 15" Tibook -- it beats the T20 hands-down.

    So if you're stuck in an intel world, the T20/t23/t-whatever series is a great laptop from IBM. The only major drawback I've noticed is very short (45 minute-1 hour) battery life, although that may be fixed on newer models.

    I also tried to use virtual PC on my Tibook -- it ran *OK* -- not great, pretty slow. Main problem is that it sucks all of the CPU and the fan kicks in and the thing gets hot enough to burn your knee. All that power consumption kills battery life.

    For 'normal' work in the os x environment the tibook is quiet, fast, and the battery lasts a long time (I get about 3 hours for typical work, about 1.25 hours for watching DVDs).

    --
    "But actually trying to use m4 as a general-purpose langage would be deeply perverse" --ESR
  110. Sony? by 0nerox0 · · Score: 1

    I bought a really nice Vaio with a desktop chip. It's faster than my desktop (1.7ghz amd). I've carried it around with me at college for a year so far with no probs. Bought it from sony.com. GX something or other model.

  111. Re:Holy Crap OMFG, that was classic Tsarkon Report by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I love you brother in the holy war to expose the stupid motherfuckers that sit at a table with a fork, knife and spoon, and insist on eating a steak with a spoon. Such is the fucking average Mac user.

    HAHAHAHA.

    Agnostic. I am Agnostic. Macs have a very small place. But if this idiot cant switch over to Linux, Windows 2000 or Solaris without pissing and whining, he is a fuck. In fact, I cant think of anything that Windows doesnt do. Sure, video editing is more interesting on Mac, but a fuckload slower.

    Zealots who demand Macs at work better have a good excuse. The really sharp Macheads all have thier own laptops anyway, since they dont mind waiting - they figure its easier to always have what they think they need.

    If the guy wont put his money where his mouth is and tries to buck the company with fuckheaded demands to excuse himself from being productive, good job firing the little fucker.

    There are legions of smarter more flexible people ready to do a better job anyway

  112. Re:Holy Crap Tsarkon Reports by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are such a fucking Tool. You are a bad troll. Your are a bizarre, foolish know nothing bitch.

    You sexless /.-ing freak.

    You are a commuinist in life because mediocre people revel in it.

    You are a Fascist mac L-user.

    Piss off freak.

  113. Apple? Quality? by illogic · · Score: 1

    I work in the computer service dept. of an all-Apple liberal arts college, and the thought of searching for an "Apple-quality" laptop makes me chuckle. The original iBook and Powerbook G3 were both pretty solid machines, for their time. But I would not, under any circumstances, buy a new iBook or TiBook.

    The white iBook's biggest problem is its constantly failing LCD. The majority of the iBooks we see make an awful creaking noise when the lid is opened, which is the sound of the plastic LCD housing separating. We also see many batteries failing within 1-2 years. And no PC Card slot? No (independent) dual display? No Airport Extreme (802.11g)? Only a G3? Make no mistake, the iBook is a -budget- laptop.

    The G4 Powerbook is built like a supermodel - sleek, sexy... and extremely fragile. The only exception, however, is the new 12" Powerbook - it's a little early to pass judgement, but the newest models seem to be incredibly solid. There's all kinds of extra structural reinforcement (which make it a bitch to work on), but the difference is immediately obvious. If anyone wanted to buy an Apple laptop, this would be the one.

    That said, my next laptop would most certainly be an IBM. If Apple were Volkswagen, IBM would be BMW. I have a friend with an older T20, and I swear you can hear the lid hermetically seal when you close it. The BIOS is AMAZINGLY configurable. IBMs run Linux like a champ; hell, they used to SELL them with Caldera OpenLinux preloaded! My housemate also has a Thinkpad, and when she went to reinstall Windows, the machine did an automatic factory restoration... without a CD. Those little touches convinced me that a Thinkpad is the only laptop ever worth buying. That is, if you can get past those damn eraser-head trackpoints.

  114. eNote / Lindows by TWX · · Score: 1

    That's the same computer that is also being sold under the Lindows brand.

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
  115. which laptop by odecom · · Score: 1

    ever try alienware.com? they have awesome computers, and all of them are very high quality. their laptop is really a powerful desktop in disguise.

  116. Samsung X10 by dan+the+person · · Score: 1

    Same price as the 12" powerbook, same or better features, half the weight.