Slashdot Mirror


Florida's Version Of TIA May Spread To Other States

Annoying Cowwart writes "Looks like TIA is coming back, this time through the by-the States-but-all-together backdoor. Now called M.A.T.R.I.X. ('Multistate Anti-Terrorism Information Exchange'). See the Washington Post article for details. I wonder: do they have to try hard to find such apt names for their projects or does it come naturally? (For German speakers, there is another article about this in Der Spiegel.)"

424 comments

  1. Heh.. by kmak · · Score: 0

    When you spend public money, you can afford consulting for name.. which is actually pretty expensive..

    --

    I'm not the devil.. just his advocate.
    1. Re:Heh.. by kmak · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And whatever happened to privacy? Sure, it's for the law enforcement people, but err.. what if it falls into the wrong hands?

      --

      I'm not the devil.. just his advocate.
    2. Re:Heh.. by Transient0 · · Score: 3, Funny

      You mean that there are people whose job it is to come up with these stupid acronyms?

      That makes my life so much easier. I thought I was going to have to break into each organization one by one and go through old memos to figure out which weenie first proposed each one before I could cleanly and silently exterminate them.

      If these people actually congregate and have offices, I can get a group rate. Awesome.

    3. Re:Heh.. by loginx · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's pretty clear the name is on purpose considering if you just read the first letters, it simply reads MATIX so they obviously did spend quite a bit of time to make it sound stupid.

    4. Re:Heh.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shouldn't this have the "Florida" tag?

    5. Re:Heh.. by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 1

      You mean that there are people whose job it is to come up with these stupid acronyms?

      Yup. I knew this guy, actually. His name was Agent Smith...

      --
      You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
    6. Re:Heh.. by Ominous+Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Actually, if you read only the first letters, it spells "MATIE". I suppose they weren't going for much of a pirate theme though. "Yarr, matie, we be catchin' us some terrorists, arr.."

      --
      Ceci n'est pas une sig.
    7. Re:Heh.. by uncoveror · · Score: 1

      Those are at Fark, not Slashdot.

      --
      The Uncoveror: It's the real news.
    8. Re:Heh.. by CausticWindow · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yes we Americans can certainly be daft in our naming our laws.

      This is on par with the godawfully named P.A.T.R.I.O.T act.

      I'm still waiting for the J.I.N.G.O.I.S.M act.

      --
      How small a thought it takes to fill a whole life
    9. Re:Heh.. by jazman_777 · · Score: 1
      I'm still waiting for the J.I.N.G.O.I.S.M act.

      We don't need an act. We're jingoes by nature.

      --
      Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    10. Re:Heh.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, "Florida" means stupid everywhere and should be properly marked with a warning label.

    11. Re:Heh.. by missing000 · · Score: 1

      Those are nice.

      The one I really want to see from Florida however is V.I.A. or Voting Information Awareness.

      Let's try and fix actual problems before making new ones up.

    12. Re:Heh.. by chef_raekwon · · Score: 1

      whose job it is to come up with these stupid acronyms?

      funny you should mention this...when i first read the headline - - i thought it was TLA, Three Letter Acronyms...

      and somehow they were going to be sharing Florida's version.....

      --
      We're like rats, in some experiment! -- George Costanza
    13. Re:Heh.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah-huh... and the reason TLA would pop into your head first, instead of TIA like it actually says, is...? Illiteracy?

    14. Re:Heh.. by nervous_twitch · · Score: 1
      And whatever happened to privacy? Sure, it's for the law enforcement people, but err.. what if it falls into the wrong hands?

      Wrong hands... you mean like the government?

      --
      Trees everywhere, and not a forest in sight.
    15. Re:Heh.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is this going to get to the point where privacy infringements will force me out of the country? I'm not very impressed with the way privacy issues have been handled in the last few years (and I'm including pre-9-11.)

    16. Re:Heh.. by DEBEDb · · Score: 1

      That'd be Voter Intent Awareness :)

      --

      Considered harmful.
  2. And in other news... by JohnGrahamCumming · · Score: 4, Funny

    The Skynet funding bill just passed.

    1. Re:And in other news... by u-235-sentinel · · Score: 0

      Wrong movie bud :-)

      Watch the animatrix for more information on how it all started :-)

      --
      Has Comcast disconnected your Internet account? Same here. You can read about it at http://comcastissue.blogspot.com
    2. Re:And in other news... by Urkki · · Score: 1
      Funny... Laugh while you can. There are already many kinds of aircraft, and soon there will be ter^H^H^H robots too. Let's just hope there's no Skynet brewing in the 'net ;-)

      ...Actually this is kinda scary stuff to think about, especially right after watching T3...

    3. Re:And in other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone didn't have a nap today? ::grinz::

    4. Re:And in other news... by Rosonowski · · Score: 1

      One of my freinds was very very high once, and he mentioned that Skynet was just pre matrix. The war of the machines.

      --
      01101001 01100001 01101101 01101110 01101111 01110100 01100001 01101100 01100001 01110111 01111001 01100101 01110010
    5. Re:And in other news... by voss · · Score: 1

      by the time this is all over with...
      we will all be cheering on the machines. ;-)

      Who needs scary killer robots, when they have
      plenty of scary goosestepping humans ready to do
      whatever dirty work that can be thought of.

      I dont know about you guys but I think Ill side with Skynet. :-P

  3. Whoa.... by mao+che+minh · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Next time someone says "The Matrix has you", they probably won't be lying. Of course, you'll know all too well, when the CIA goons come crashing through the front door.

    1. Re:Whoa.... by JUSTONEMORELATTE · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Next time someone says "The Matrix has you", they probably won't be lying. Of course, you'll know all too well, when the CIA goons come crashing through the front door.
      So, do you kill the first six, then run from rooftop to rooftop in a mad dash to the payphone, or do you do what nobody else has ever done -- stay and fight?

      --

    2. Re:Whoa.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The next name for this bill should clearly be A.S.S.R.E.A.M

      I have no idea what that would stand for, but why the hell not? It at least describes it pretty well!

    3. Re:Whoa.... by skaffen42 · · Score: 1

      Mmmhhh... So which pill do I take again?

      --
      People couldn't type. We realized: Death would eventually take care of this.
    4. Re:Whoa.... by TeknoDragon · · Score: 1

      +1

    5. Re:Whoa.... by Safety+State · · Score: 5, Funny

      Sure, you may joke, but there's an important reason for government surveillance of consumer habits.

      Terrorists are everywhere. Yes, even in your breakfast cereal. Did you ever doubt it when they started checking supermarket discount records?

      Now you tell me: who's going to protect you when terrorists hitch a ride straight to your basement in that new Sears washer box?

      http://safetystate.com/ss.cgi?action=material&id=2 3

    6. Re:Whoa.... by El_Ge_Ex · · Score: 2, Funny

      Of course, you'll know all too well, when the CIA goons come crashing through the front door.

      If 9/11 and Iraq proved anything; it's that the CIA is the least of our worries. Now the NSA. Them some scary ass Mo-Fo's! Like, I remember one time I saw these guys in black......

      WHACK!

      (thud)

      Man: Move along. Nothing to See Here...

      -B

    7. Re:Whoa.... by ticklemestalin · · Score: 1

      You folks have gotten it all wrong! Terrorists ARE everywhere, lurking in the guise of loyal Americans. We need to analyze their patterns of consumption so that we can determine who has been raised to capitalism and who is only pretending. And besides, how else can we refine the total target marketing that makes this country so great?

      I'm spending all my time here at work trying to think up a TIA for T.E.R.M.I.N.A.T.O.R.

    8. Re:Whoa.... by AllUsernamesAreGone · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And what if they *gasp* get it wrong?

      And what about when someone who shouldn't gets access to the system and either farms details, or better yet, frames you?

      And what about when you may actually have a reason to organise a rebellion because your government has turned your country into a police state the KGB would envy?

      I've lived with real terrorism all my life - I was 5 minutes away from being killed on one occasion I know of for certain (Manchester IRA bombing) and probably more. As far as I'm concerned this "keeping track of YOU so they can't blow you up" is nothing more than a way to monitor and control a nation, it has nothing to do with stopping terrorists.

    9. Re:Whoa.... by Safety+State · · Score: 2, Funny

      "I'm spending all my time here at work trying to think up a TIA for T.E.R.M.I.N.A.T.O.R."

      Terrorist Estimate Report Management Institute Nationally Authorized To Obscure Reality

    10. Re:Whoa.... by spickus · · Score: 2, Funny

      Do you work for the state of Florida?

      --
      Indecision is the key to flexibility.
    11. Re:Whoa.... by jazman_777 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      And what about when you may actually have a reason to organise a rebellion because your government has turned your country into a police state the KGB would envy?

      I am an American, I can't help but bark out: this is the land of the free, the home of the brave! United we stand! These colors don't run! America: love it or leave it! Blah blah blah.

      Fact is, secession was an accepted option, until Lincoln crushed it out of existence. After all, we seceded from the British Empire.

      --
      Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    12. Re:Whoa.... by ThereIsNoSporkNeo · · Score: 2, Funny

      Take them both.

      It will cause a logic fault in the system, bringing it crashing to the ground.

      You'll be a hero. Seriously.

      --
      With my dying breath, I curse Zoidberg!
    13. Re:Whoa.... by ThereIsNoSporkNeo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Fact is, secession was an accepted option, until Lincoln crushed it out of existence. After all, we seceded from the British Empire."

      Yes, and the British Empire patted us on the back, said "Good for you", and as we were leaving said "Sometimes, you just have to let them grow up."

      Or perhaps they fought us just like Lincoln fought the South. One or the other.

      --
      With my dying breath, I curse Zoidberg!
    14. Re:Whoa.... by jazman_777 · · Score: 1
      Yes, and the British Empire patted us on the back, said "Good for you", and as we were leaving said "Sometimes, you just have to let them grow up."

      Or perhaps they fought us just like Lincoln fought the South. One or the other.

      Of course the Controlling State resists the secession, duh, that's the nature of the state. However, it was a philosophically accepted option from 1789-1861. Thomas Jefferson, his first inaugural address, 1801: "If there be any among us who wish to dissolve the Union or to change its republican form, let them stand undisturbed, as monuments of the safety with which error of opinion may be tolerated where reason is left free to combat it."

      --
      Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    15. Re:Whoa.... by xThinkx · · Score: 3, Funny

      American Secret Service Reconnaissance Extraction And Misuse

      --
      Let's get one thing perfectly clear, I did not vote for George W Bush, and I do not endorse what he does or says.
      "
    16. Re:Whoa.... by chimpslice · · Score: 5, Informative

      They will get it wrong, it's a certainty. I work for the State of Florida and deal with FDLE every day, and like any other cops they're not above harassment, vendettas, and abuse of power. More dangerously, some of the techs and investigators are just not all that bright. The law enforcement databases that are being pulled together are chock full of erroneous information. The clerks who enter the data don't make a living wage and there's a high turnover, so the quality of data entry is very low. Those who work in law enforcement are aware of this, but it's very hard to challenge something once it's in there, and they like it that way. If you know someone it helps.

      What's most fascinating to me is the bit about "commercially available databases" being included as well. Does this include your credit card receipts? How about the data collected by your supermarket discount card?

      PS for the Non-Americans out there . . . I know the development of the culture of surveillance might be disturbing to you, but all we want is to be on reality TV. The Bush administration understands this deep-seated human need and is doing all they can to get us all on camera.

    17. Re:Whoa.... by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      Of course, you'll know all too well, when the CIA goons come crashing through the front door. ...which can't happen because the CIA doesn't have "goons".

      But thanks anyway for the paranoia.

    18. Re:Whoa.... by Tackhead · · Score: 1
      > And what if they *gasp* get it wrong?

      If a tree falls in the forest, and nobody's around to hear it, did it make a sound?

      If a threat is neutralized before it does harm, did "they" really make a mistake?

    19. Re:Whoa.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If the wrong tree is cut down in the forest does anybody know?

    20. Re:Whoa.... by Travoltus · · Score: 1

      Terrorists! They're everywhere!

      eh, except for your gas tank.

      --
      --- Grow a pair, liberals... stop letting the Republicans bully you!
    21. Re:Whoa.... by Catbeller · · Score: 1

      "Paranoia" is a clinical condition, a severe mental disorder. I grew up with a paranoiac; and he, sir, is not a paranoiac.

      A paranoiac, or paranoid, your choice, really and truly believes that entities are out to get him. Right now. And will spend thousands of hours of your time discussing in minute, excruciating, painfully insane detail that they could not possibly know of, even if there was someone out to get them. They cannot be argued out of their delusions. They become catatonic or hysterical when they are forced to confront the lack of actual evidence for their beliefs. I've known two such people, close to me. It's a sad disorder, treatment for which is best left to professionals.

      Now, as for the CIA bursting in your door. Yes, they do do that. Yes, they do torture and kill, especially with the Neocons, a REALLY paranoid group, pulling their strings today.

      And the CIA is not a homogenous organization. Rumsfeld is known to have created his own private intelligence service, to serve up the answers he wants to hear. There must be other types of nonaccountable "private" intelligence groups. And knowing the really paranoid worldview the neocons hold, I've no doubt they are killing with abandon. Hell, they are killing targets right out iin the open, in Iraq, right now. Why the hell are they executing former officials and offspring of Saddam? Under what authority? I swear, If you look at what kind of power structure we are building in Iraq, you see a vision of what the 'cons would like the U.S. to look like: arbitrary arrest or execution, clamps on the press, RIAA dictating copyright laws...

      Well, the CIA isn't really a problem in the U.S. I'd picture the nebulous group, Homeland Security, kicking in my door and dragging me off to torture and secret imprisonment. I can picture it because it is being done, to people most Americans don't give a damn about: poor immigrants with Middle Eastern backgrounds. But someday, the definition of "terrorist sympathizer" will inevitably expand, and good ol' white folk in the 'burbs will be disappeared as well.

      Not paranoia. It is happening now.

    22. Re:Whoa.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like the song says
      "Waiter there's a terrorist in my soup!"

    23. Re:Whoa.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Two words...USE CASH.

      Yes, it's more inconvenient. But you keep both your privacy and your dignity.

      Here's what will ultimately happen - the police/government agencies will get their new toy - they'll abuse it, just like they always have, and after a groundswell of protest from people who have had enough, they'll get it taken away.

    24. Re:Whoa.... by Safety+State · · Score: 1

      ...as long as you keep it filled.

    25. Re:Whoa.... by Safety+State · · Score: 1

      Freedom onion soup?

    26. Re:Whoa.... by bishop32x · · Score: 1

      It already has. see here

  4. Wrong department by TopShelf · · Score: 4, Funny

    Considering that this is coming around "through the back door" I'd suggest a change from "the over-your-shoulder dept."...

    --
    Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    1. Re:Wrong department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      from the "watch out for your cornhole dept"

    2. Re:Wrong department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or the 'Now accepting deliveries in the rear' department, coz U got phucked |-|4r|>c0R3!

    3. Re:Wrong department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought: the-government-really-sticking-it-to-you-hard but perhaps that is a little less acceptable to post on the front page.

    4. Re:Wrong department by Anonymous+Cow+herd · · Score: 1

      Don't worry... with the MATRIX system in place, you won't need to watch your cornhole... Big Brother will be watching it for you :)

      --
      Ita erat quando hic adveni.
  5. Floomp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Flomp
    Flimp

  6. Huh? by freeze128 · · Score: 1

    When I use the first letter of each word, I get M.A.T.I.X.

    Where is the "R"?

    1. Re:Huh? by Transient0 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually you get M.A.T.I.E. as in "Ahoy Matie!"

      You see, secretly they are pirates and this whole MATRIX thing is just an elaborate cover-up.

    2. Re:Huh? by Zaknafein500 · · Score: 1

      No one ever said lawmakers could spell...

      --

      "The guide is definitive, reality is frequently inaccurate."
    3. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TerroRism?

    4. Re:Huh? by SharpFang · · Score: 1

      One of the 3 in terrorism. Now the real question is WHICH one?!

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    5. Re:Huh? by the_pooh_experience · · Score: 1

      When I use the first letter of each word, I get M.A.T.I.X.

      That is funny, when I use the first letter of each word, I get M.A.T.I.E.. I guess the pirate reference (something like "eye, matie") was just too close to the truth...
    6. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And it's clear freeze128 can't spell Exchange.

    7. Re:Huh? by O_Chaos · · Score: 1

      Come on now, that MATIX wouldnt be as fun or cool!

      MATRIX it is

      --
      Into MMORPG's? Check it out!
    8. Re:Huh? by Thjorska · · Score: 1

      Yarr, they be on to us an' our scheme to plunder their civil liberties. We make for Kingston at dawn!

      --
      Current Karma Status: Roadkill
  7. Hm... Bush Runs FL, too by Ishin · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Any surprise that the state that the Bush family currently runs would be the one that's getting this off the ground?

    The FL legislature has been battling all year about medical malpractice suit caps on awards from juries, with the senate holding strong (so far) against them. However, at this point, no matter how anti-common-man the proposal's coming through this state I remain unamazed, I just chalk another one up to the Bush family. Was FL the head of the serpent that Nostradamus predicted?

    1. Re:Hm... Bush Runs FL, too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Any surprise that the state that the Bush family currently runs would be the one that's getting this off the ground?
      None at all.
      W. is trying for an endrun around the constition (budget is trivial for him; just run up the deficit).

      What is scarey is how much jeb is hiding down there and how bad he is. But you get what you voted for.

    2. Re:Hm... Bush Runs FL, too by Sheetrock · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think it's a bit much to push this all on one family, especially since it's only one guy running the state. Besides, the wheels for all of this were set in motion by the last guy, and if you look a bit closer at the people involved you realize many of them are Democrats.

      --

      Try not. Do or do not, there is no try.
      -- Dr. Spock, stardate 2822-3.




    3. Re:Hm... Bush Runs FL, too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting
      It's funny how different people see things. Every election. I've watch the Reps are "tough on crime" and they say the Dems are weak on it. They want more surveillance, more prisons, and fewer rights for individuals (aka criminals). They are also the ones leading the charge on "lawsuit reform", but they only care about lawsuits by the common man against companies. Yet they don't care about big companies suing little companies over IP and other monopolistic things.

      It just stuns me that anyone could deny this. Every election they uses the same rhetoric. Yet, if you listen to talk radio and it's followers, it's liberals who want a police state. WTF?

      I guess they're still pissed they can't dump used motor oil in the stream anymore.

    4. Re:Hm... Bush Runs FL, too by dnoyeb · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Florida is full of shit. (pardon my french)

      Any mail I get from FL immediately goes into the trash. Their is something wrong with their laws down their and most of the late '80s vacation spam scam came from FL. I don't think they could be prosecuted as in other states. At this point they have become a part of the economy of FL, and that means they have influence. I would suspect if email spam gets any legal footing, the servers will end up in Florida...

      To sum it up, any offer from Florida is a scam.

    5. Re:Hm... Bush Runs FL, too by Concerned+Onlooker · · Score: 1
      Am I missing something? Perhaps something in the German version? The article states:
      "The Matrix project began soon after the 2001 attacks."
      So, how were the wheels of this set in motion by the last guy?
      --
      http://www.rootstrikers.org/
    6. Re:Hm... Bush Runs FL, too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      As far as I'm concerned, the republicrat/demopublican parties are both as bad as eachtother. There has been a quiet fascist coup spanning BOTH parties.

    7. Re:Hm... Bush Runs FL, too by kallisti · · Score: 4, Informative
      It's funny how different people see things. Every election. I've watch the Reps are "tough on crime" and they say the Dems are weak on it. They want more surveillance, more prisons, and fewer rights for individuals (aka criminals). They are also the ones leading the charge on "lawsuit reform", but they only care about lawsuits by the common man against companies. Yet they don't care about big companies suing little companies over IP and other monopolistic things.


      It's the Democrats who come up with most of the IP legislation. Clinton was "tough on crime" and promised to double the police force. He also signed the CDA, COPA, CIPA, DMCA, and Digital Millenium act. Remember the Clipper chip?


      The only difference is in what they say. I care more about what they do.

    8. Re:Hm... Bush Runs FL, too by heli0 · · Score: 1

      "The FL legislature has been battling all year about medical malpractice suit caps on awards from juries"

      The cap only applies to "pain and suffering" not REAL damages.

      This has been forced by trial lawyers and will spread to every state.

      In Texas 14 out of 17 medical-liability insurers have left the state in the last two years alone. There are 300 lawsuits for every 100 doctors in the state, and eevn though 80% of the suits are found to be without merit, it still takes $50k to defend against each one.

      --
      Whenever the offence inspires less horror than the punishment, the rigour of penal law is obliged to give way...
    9. Re:Hm... Bush Runs FL, too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You want a cap put on the worth of a human life? That's what a malpractice cap basically does.

      Whether the person that has been injured is a superstar basketball player or a $5 an hour teenager taking your order at Mc Donald's, they are still both humans, and the constitution guarantees them the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. I don't know about you, but the amount of money I'm going to make during my life plus $250k isn't a fair trade to me for the ability to use my eyesight, or walk on my own two legs, or hear my children's words. Those things are all priceless, and they're something that would have an arbitrary value placed on them when a grossly negligent physician takes one or more of those things away from a US citizen.

      Surely not every malpractice case is like mentioned above, but let's not throw the baby out with the bathwater through stupid legislation that in the end only benefits those that are the real source of blame.

    10. Re:Hm... Bush Runs FL, too by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1
      We are lucky.

      "Florida" as it is called, is an unstable sandbar - not any actual land-mass at all. The temporal existance of the greater part of this "Florida" is geologically insignificant. A good hurricane could partially submerge much of the area for good.

      How does one cast votes from a causeway?

      Come on California - Let's pray for rain!

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    11. Re:Hm... Bush Runs FL, too by kableh · · Score: 1

      Right, and Dems are the ones who are "deficit spenders". I bet they stop using that line come next election.

      Cocksuckers.

      I really want to start qualifying everyone who comes into my office for support with "do you vote straight ticket Republican? Then get the fuck out of here."

    12. Re:Hm... Bush Runs FL, too by missing000 · · Score: 0

      Besides, the wheels for all of this were set in motion by the last guy, and if you look a bit closer at the people involved you realize many of them are Democrats.

      Sure, you say that, but do you have any proof?

      Oh, who am I kidding, you are only a Troll.

    13. Re:Hm... Bush Runs FL, too by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      That's true in mid/south Florida. Where I live in north Florida is actually 60 ft above sea level with pretty stable ground.

      So you go ahead & pray for rain, we've been praying for earthquakes for years, with better results.

      Arizona Bay, here I come. (apologies to Bill Hicks)

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    14. Re:Hm... Bush Runs FL, too by FroMan · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I love how open minded slashdotters are.

      Bet you hate Christians too?

      --
      Norris/Palin 2012
      Fact: We deserve leaders who can kick your ass and field dress your carcass.
    15. Re:Hm... Bush Runs FL, too by kableh · · Score: 1

      I resent Christians who think that I have to live the same life they do, and feel pity for the hole in their lives that they have to fill with religion. Hate isn't the right word.

  8. M.A.T.R.I.X? Try M.A.T.I.E by wowbagger · · Score: 4, Funny

    Multistate
    Anti
    Terrorism
    Information
    Exchange

    Now, how the hell do you get MATRIX out of that?

    More like MATIE, as in:
    "ARR MATIE, we be getting the blackmail goods on the serfs, arrr!"

    1. Re:M.A.T.R.I.X? Try M.A.T.I.E by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Will it surprise you to find out that Matrix is the real abbreviation, but that the meaning is something different.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    2. Re:M.A.T.R.I.X? Try M.A.T.I.E by ClickNMix · · Score: 1

      Multistate
      Anti
      Te
      Rrorism
      Information
      eXchan ge

      In other words, they fudge it to make it sound cooler. And its just as likely to be a bunch of techies thinking it was funny at the time, untill it stuck, then it is someone in a suit.

      --
      I saw the light at the end of the tunnel... But it was just someone with a flashlight bringing more work.
    3. Re:M.A.T.R.I.X? Try M.A.T.I.E by cK-Gunslinger · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Multistate
      Anti
      TeRrorism
      Information
      eXchange

      You can make an acronym of out anything, if you try hard enough. :)

    4. Re:M.A.T.R.I.X? Try M.A.T.I.E by Genjurosan · · Score: 2, Informative

      The story poster should have been more specific...

      The name was chosen somewhat whimsically by a Florida law enforcement officer, an agency official said

    5. Re:M.A.T.R.I.X? Try M.A.T.I.E by TopShelf · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've got a great example of that. There is a project currently going on that's called PULSE. Ooh, cool sounding acronym, right? Guess what it stands for?

      Logistics Processes which are Uniform, Lean and supported by a common System Environment.

      Of course, the guys who dreamed this up aren't native English speakers...

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    6. Re:M.A.T.R.I.X? Try M.A.T.I.E by mopslik · · Score: 1

      Some groups simply pull random letters from words to form catchy-sounding acronyms. Consider:

      attRibute pIracy for crAppy sAles
      sluMping Profits, pAss legislAtion
      ranDomly Misapply Copyright clAims

    7. Re:M.A.T.R.I.X? Try M.A.T.I.E by cK-Gunslinger · · Score: 1

      Just rolls right off the tongue, doesn't it. :P

    8. Re:M.A.T.R.I.X? Try M.A.T.I.E by pdbogen · · Score: 1

      Multistate Anti TeRorism Information X-Change ...Yeah, well, I still agree with you.

    9. Re:M.A.T.R.I.X? Try M.A.T.I.E by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Arr, don't forget me maties:

      A month yonder, and ye'll all be speekin' pirate-likes!

    10. Re:M.A.T.R.I.X? Try M.A.T.I.E by the_pooh_experience · · Score: 3, Funny
      how about

      MUltistaTe
      AnTi
      tErrORism
      InFormatIon
      exChangE

    11. Re:M.A.T.R.I.X? Try M.A.T.I.E by tyrant · · Score: 1

      My favourite acronym has to be:

      Committee for the
      Liberation and
      Integration of
      Terrifying
      Organisms and their
      Rehabilitation
      Into
      Society

      from Red Dwarf - Polymorph

    12. Re:M.A.T.R.I.X? Try M.A.T.I.E by uncoveror · · Score: 1

      Call it MATRIX, call it MATIE, call it Total Information Awareness, or anything else. It is really the same thing, The Beast.

      --
      The Uncoveror: It's the real news.
    13. Re:M.A.T.R.I.X? Try M.A.T.I.E by Molina+the+Bofh · · Score: 1

      I think someone there read too many Huey, Dewey and Louie comics during childhood. Remember the acronyms they had when scouts ?

      --

      -
      Roses are #FF0000, Violets are #0000FF, find / -name '*base*' |xargs chown -R us && mv zig greatjustice
    14. Re:M.A.T.R.I.X? Try M.A.T.I.E by *weasel · · Score: 1

      i thought it was:

      Coalition for the
      Liberation of
      Itinerant
      Tree-dwellers

      an offshoot of the:

      Liberate
      Apes
      Before
      Imprisoning
      Apes movement.

      --
      // "Can't clowns and pirates just -try- to get along?"
    15. Re:M.A.T.R.I.X? Try M.A.T.I.E by proj_2501 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Get Rid Of Slimy girlS?

    16. Re:M.A.T.R.I.X? Try M.A.T.I.E by Toasty981 · · Score: 1

      Should be modded "Redundant."

      On the other hand, it wouldn't spell anything otherwise :)

    17. Re:M.A.T.R.I.X? Try M.A.T.I.E by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I think someone there read too many Huey, Dewey and Louie comics during childhood. Remember the acronyms they had when scouts ?

      Uh, ok, you wanna finish that sentence or you gonna keep us in ?

    18. Re:M.A.T.R.I.X? Try M.A.T.I.E by Tjp($)pjT · · Score: 1

      Or

      MUlTistate
      ANTi
      TeRroism
      Information
      eXchange

      In Russia, er... Florida, you don't eat your breakfast cereal, your breakfast cereal eats you.

      --
      - Tjp

      I am in wallow with my inner money grubbing capitalistic pig. ... Oink!

    19. Re:M.A.T.R.I.X? Try M.A.T.I.E by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Phooey.

      Manufactured
      Anti-American
      Threat
      Is
      Empty
      --------------------
      Makes
      Americans
      Think
      Revolution
      Is
      Xpected

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  9. In other news.. by Genjurosan · · Score: 4, Funny

    Melchior-1, Balthasar-2, and Casper-3 just entered QA testing. It's expected that when all 3 systems are deployed to production, the M.A.T.R.I.X system will use the MAGI computers to determine if the citizen in question should be eliminated.

    1. Re:In other news.. by mystik · · Score: 5, Funny

      All we need now is to figure out how to clone a blue-haired 14-year-old-girl to pilot a large robot to defend it...

      --
      Why aren't you encrypting your e-mail?
    2. Re:In other news.. by imsabbel · · Score: 1

      Ha!
      Just clone one....

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    3. Re:In other news.. by DeltaSigma · · Score: 1

      Bush: God is in his heaven, and all is right with the world.

    4. Re:In other news.. by JayBlalock · · Score: 1

      Great ref! If I had Mod points I'd so give you some. The real question is whose mother's soul ends up in there.

      --
      Bush: He's Liberal in all the wrong ways.
    5. Re:In other news.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd volunteer my mother if she wasn't dead.

    6. Re:In other news.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yours

    7. Re:In other news.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eva was dubbed in Texas.

    8. Re:In other news.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just bring her on. I'll fuck her brains out and we can insert it.

    9. Re:In other news.. by Gorelab · · Score: 1

      And find the biggest 14 year old loser in the world, ang give him a large mech of his own too.

    10. Re:In other news.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is too true.

  10. Naming is honest by sploxx · · Score: 1

    At least, naming such a monster "the Matrix" is honest. Or, at least, kind of.

  11. Needs more "X"s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Matrix takes domestic surveillance TO THE EXTREME!

    1. Re:Needs more "X"s by Trigun · · Score: 1

      When can I get the MatriXXX and spy on horny housewives?

    2. Re:Needs more "X"s by bustacap · · Score: 1

      Ah, that was the funniest thing I read all morning! To the EXTREME dude.

  12. Scary quote by cK-Gunslinger · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A senior official overseeing the project acknowledged it could be intrusive and pledged to use it with restraint. "It's scary. It could be abused. I mean, I can call up everything about you, your pictures and pictures of your neighbors," said Phil Ramer, special agent in charge of statewide intelligence. "Our biggest problem now is everybody who hears about it wants it."
    1. Re:Scary quote by DrWho520 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      In 1999, the Drug Enforcement Administration and the FBI suspended information service contracts with an earlier Asher-run company because of concerns about his past, according to law enforcement sources. The Chicago Tribune reported in 1987 that court documents in a federal drug case said defense lawyer F. Lee Bailey, who identified Asher as a pilot and onetime smuggler, offered him as an informant.

      Who are the criminals here, the people violating our civil rights by using this thing or the former drug trafficer heading its development? Is not this sort of system supposed to track these people down?

      Maybe we should be considered the criminals if we let this sort of thing proceed.

      --
      The cancel button is your friend. Do not hesitate to use it.
    2. Re:Scary quote by pmz · · Score: 4, Insightful

      ...your pictures and pictures of your neighbors...

      So, the DMV is now their data-entry division? That's the only way they could get digitized photographs of most people.

      After tying together the DMV, the IRS, and the credit reporting agencies, there probably isn't anything they can't know about a person. They'll even be able to tell what brand of locks are on people's houses, whether any large defensive dogs live on the property, and the guns a person owns. All because of registrations and credit cards.

      When they come for you, at least they will be prepared.

    3. Re:Scary quote by Khomar · · Score: 4, Interesting
      pledged to use it with restraint

      While that is all well and good, assuming that we can in fact trust this particular "senior official", what guarantees do we have that his successor will use the same "restraint"? How can we enforce this restraint especially in the current climate where all restraints regarding privacy and liberty seem to be expendable in the interests of national security?

      --

      I believe in de-evolution. God made the world perfect, man fell, and its been going downhill ever since!

    4. Re:Scary quote by pivo · · Score: 1

      Maybe we should be considered the criminals if we let this sort of thing proceed.

      Exactly. We're getting the government we deserve.

      "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
      - Benjamin Franklin

    5. Re:Scary quote by nonameisgood · · Score: 1

      Restraint in the law enforcement community, an oxymoron if ever there was one.

      The other day, I was pulled over for speeding (65 in a 55) about 120 miles from home - after running my plate & DL, the state trooper knew my dog's name of all things.

      Privacy. I got it, I got it, I ain't got it!

      --
      Faith is the very antithesis of reason, injudiciousness a critical component of spiritual devotion. Jon Krakauer
    6. Re:Scary quote by deop · · Score: 5, Insightful

      ...there probably isn't anything they can't know about a person...

      True, if you consider the collection of numbers that identify you to be everything about you. But don't you think that people that are trying to hide things about themselves would have a way to do so, under the radar? Not everyone uses credit cards, many people don't drive, lots don't register their dogs.

      Seems to me that such a system really works best on people with nothing to hide - which contradicts the very purpose for which it is intended.

    7. Re:Scary quote by wwcsa · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The scary thing is that they have this information in the first place... there was always access to the information, and this system just lets the police/government access it faster:

      "Paul S. Cameron, president of Seisint Inc., the Boca Raton, Fla., company that developed the Matrix system and donated it to the state, said: 'It is exactly how law enforcement worked yesterday, except it's extraordinarily faster. In this age of risks that appear immediately, you have to be able to respond immediately.'"

    8. Re:Scary quote by pmz · · Score: 1

      Not everyone uses credit cards...

      True. Cash is always an alternative, at least until genuine "e-money" is invented and mandated.

      ...many people don't drive...

      Public transportation is generally a failure in the U.S., except for in the largest cities. Generally, a license to drive is also a license for earning a living, anymore.

      ...lots don't register their dogs.

      I was referring to the Wal-Mart receipt that shows a person buying the 60-pound bag of Ol'Roy dog food, the cow thigh-bone chew toy, and the "for dogs over 150 lbs." flea treatment. For the locks, they will see a person buying Schlage Tough Ass Brand locks at Lowes (whose manufacturing lot had key combinations ranging from #1234 to #1876). The key to all this is a credit card, debit card, or store discount card tie-in. For the guns, it is the obvious required registration (for law-abiding citizens, that is).

    9. Re:Scary quote by sanity_slipping · · Score: 1

      Who are the criminals here, the people violating our civil rights by using this thing or the former drug trafficer heading its development?

      Oh, don't worry about that. So what if he used to be a drug trafficker, he was never arrested or charged, and that makes it okay.

      --
      I can feel my sanity, beyond my reach and slipping...
    10. Re:Scary quote by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      "Few RPGs have offered the level of open-ended gameplay, the Hollywood-quality back story, or the innovative character development that Deus Ex did"

      .........how much tin foil you buy per month.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    11. Re:Scary quote by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      "They'll even be able to tell what brand of locks are on people's houses, whether any large defensive dogs live on the property, and the guns a person owns."

      ........how much tin foil you buy...

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    12. Re:Scary quote by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      whoah, screwed that copy/paste up, sorry guys!

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    13. Re:Scary quote by 4of12 · · Score: 1

      >Not everyone uses credit cards...

      True. Cash is always an alternative


      Is it?

      See if you can buy an airline ticket and rent a car with only cash and a driver's license. I doubt you can.

      --
      "Provided by the management for your protection."
    14. Re:Scary quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      What if a consumer proxy service were set up? Someone requests some goods, someone else buys them - neither of them know each other, nor will they ever know each other. Once you buy the goods, the person who requested them can acquire them. There are several problems that would need to be worked out (like a method of anonymous payment), but once something like this is in place, any tracking is completely useless. Every consumer is representing one or more other consumers - but most importantly, NOT themselves.

      Obviously, this would be more difficult when it comes to things like houses and cars, but for the day-to-day stuff, it might be workable.

    15. Re:Scary quote by projecto2501 · · Score: 1

      His plegde is as good as the paper it's written on. Twin forces guarantee that no matter how sincere this man is, your information is not safe in his system. They are incompetence and mean-spiritedness.

      Seroiusly, this is why we have the Constitution, so that the powers of government are clearly circumscribed. His "word of honor" is not sufficient, and he should know better. When the developer of the system describes it as scary, you better damn watch out.

      Maybe it's time for a privacy ammendment.

    16. Re:Scary quote by bishop32x · · Score: 1

      backdoor anyone?

  13. Dear Florida by Travoltus · · Score: 2, Funny

    TAKE THE RED PILL!!!

    --
    --- Grow a pair, liberals... stop letting the Republicans bully you!
    1. Re:Dear Florida by harley_frog · · Score: 1
      From now on I'm going to be popping red pills like they were Tic-Tacs, staying close to land lines, run from anyone dressed in a dark suit and sunglasses, and start learning Kung-Fu.

      --
      It's all fun and games until someone loses the key to the handcuffs.
  14. MATRIX by pdbogen · · Score: 2, Funny

    "We'll call it Matrix, that way all those geeks that oppose tyrrany will thank it's cool."

    "But Boss, wasn't the Matrix an evil, tyrranical computer that wanted to subjugate and/or destroy humanity and free thought?"

    ***VOIP***

    You get a nickle if you get the reference. And, I don't mean the generic The Matrix reference.

    1. re: MATRIX by ed.han · · Score: 1

      huh? they use voice over IP in those phones in the movies?

      ed

    2. Re:MATRIX by rolocroz · · Score: 1

      Is this a Teen Girl Squad reference?

      --

      I meta-mod all positive moderation Unfair, because it's abuse of the system.

    3. Re:MATRIX by Exatron · · Score: 1

      Actually, the Matrix is a big basketball with silver handles and a glowing blue crystal in the center.

      --
      "I think so, Brain, but 'instant karma' always gets so lumpy." - Pinky
      "Decepticons FOREVER!!!" - Ravage
    4. Re:MATRIX by Kusand · · Score: 1

      Do I get my MacHall nickel now?

    5. Re:MATRIX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I googled and googled, but can't get the reference. It sounds like The Simpsons to me.

      I'll give you a nickel if you proof read your comments. :-)
      I count one typo and three spelling mistakes, but then I'm dyslexic, so who am I to speak up.

      --
      me

    6. Re:MATRIX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, this guy wins. http://www.bureau42.com/view/1425 cool game, parent.

  15. Sheiss Nicht Erst Posten by Walrus99 · · Score: 1

    Dang, I found this on Der Spiegel and was about to post it, but I had to track down the English version first.

    Matrix is short for Multistate Anti-Terrorism Information Exchange.

    Only the begining . . .

  16. Acronym expansion by soundsop · · Score: 3, Informative

    FYI, TIA = Total Information Awareness

    1. Re:Acronym expansion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I thought it was a typo on T&A.

    2. Re:Acronym expansion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      FYI, it was called Terrorism Information Awareness first and Total Information Awareness for a very short time.

      --
      me

    3. Re:Acronym expansion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's try it!

      Total
      InformaTion
      AwareneSS

    4. Re:Acronym expansion by IWorkForMorons · · Score: 1

      Actually, it was called Total Information Awareness first. Then the realised people might get upset if the government was keeping a eye on everyone in the country. So they renamed it to Terrorist Information Awareness, so people would understand it's only to be used against terrorists. What people don't realise is that EVERYONE is a potential terrorist, to they'll be keeping an eye on everyone in the country anyways.

      And yes, I do have my tinfoil hat on, and major league baseball has a file on all of us...

    5. Re:Acronym expansion by NerdSlayer · · Score: 1

      What does FYI stand for? WTF?

    6. Re:Acronym expansion by Theaetetus · · Score: 1
      What does FYI stand for? WTF?

      OMG, you don't know? It's "for your information". But what's 'WTF'? (You know, we could keep going for days on this... ;) )

      -T

    7. Re:Acronym expansion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Dude, RTFM

      FM888

  17. It's all in the name by TopShelf · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Frankly, I'd be surprised if this tool is actually used in terrorist-related investigations more than a small percentage of the time.

    That said, as long as the statement holds true that "it includes information that has always been available to investigators but brings it together and enables police to access it with extraordinary speed", I really don't have too much of a problem with it. It doesn't represent an encroachment on privacy rights so much as an improvement in investigatory tools. What needs to develop alongside these tools, of course, are strict guidelines on the manner in which they should be used.

    --
    Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    1. Re:It's all in the name by cK-Gunslinger · · Score: 1

      Exactly. I want legitimate usage of the system to be quick and effortless (ex: in responding to a fratic call about a 'dark haired man in a green sedan snatching my daughter off the sidewalk'), yet have enough red-tape following its usage so that the cop-with-a-grudge-against-his-ex-wife can be busted and thrown in jail for misuse.

    2. Re:It's all in the name by AnotherBlackHat · · Score: 2, Interesting

      as long as the statement holds true that "it includes information that has always been available to investigators but brings it together and enables police to access it with extraordinary speed",


      I wouldn't mind these things so much if a record of who accessed them and what queries they made were published in a public record.

      -- this is not a .sig
    3. Re:It's all in the name by sdjunky · · Score: 1

      I would agree except for the fact that the reason some of these investigators have the access they do is because state legislators didn't think there would be much harm in it because of it's limited scope.

      This is about to change all that.

    4. Re:It's all in the name by Efreet · · Score: 1

      You'd proabaly want a one or two month delay to prevent people under surveilence from being warned prematurely, but that basically sound like a great idea.

      --
      This sig wasn't worth reading, was it.
    5. Re:It's all in the name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You and the president of that Florida company have both made the same mistake.

      He said, "It is exactly how law enforcement worked yesterday, except it's extraordinarily faster. In this age of risks that appear immediately, you have to be able to respond immediately."

      That's the equivilent to saying that transportation today is exactly the same as 300 years ago, only faster, or that nuclear bombs today are the same as gunpowder shells of 300 years ago, only bigger. All these statements are only true in a very superficial sense. A small quantitative difference is just that. A large quantitative difference can ammount to a large qualitative difference.

      For instance, he internet is nothing that couldn't have been done 100 years ago. I use MaBell to call a librarian and enter a search. She hangs up, calls me back a week later, and gives me the information. I say, oh, that's interesting, look up that word that you just said. She hangs up, calls back in a week, says she doesn't have that information, but she knows a library that does. So she links me by giving me the phone number of another library. You get it now? It would take months to find information that I can now find immediately. Now the threshold of desire/need is lowered and any body who gets a wild hair up his ass can find anything.

      Making it this much easier to find information about John Doe now ensures that more people will try to find that information. What this means is that, before, the machinery had some healthy resistance in it and was only used when there was sufficient need (in most cases). If you had good cause to believe that someone was up to no good, you put a detective on the phone for a few days, sent someone out to do some legwork. Now the threshold has been lowered. If it only takes a few clicks in a browser, why not investigate the guy with the EFF t-shirt? Why not investigate your neighbor because you don't like the asshole? Afraid they'll trace it back to you? Call your buddy in the Washington office and have him investigate your neighbor. Better yet, just have him put some false incriminating data about your neighbor (he reads Vonnegut!) into the database. What if your neighbor comes out clean? No harm done, right? Tell that to Richard Jewel.

      I don't like the argument that this system is okay if it has strict controls. Who is going to watchdog this? The government itself? Please. That's worse than useless. The ACLU? Please. The government will just make the same old argument -- they have to protect their sources and methods. And I would have to agree with them. If they're out there telling everyone that they're doing querries based on such-and-such data, the terrorists will use that information to adapt.

      I am not a Ludite. I'm all for technology. I am not for the application of technology just because it's possible. There are much better applications of technology and money. Why do we not yet have chemical detectors (for WMD as well as explosives) at every single airport? Spend the money where it not only will do great good, but also not infringe on my privacy -- monitor ports, customs, etc. more closely; monitor foreign nationals more closely; keep even better records on who's buying ammonium nitrate fertilizers and industrial chemicals.

      Instead of TIA, what we need is TPA -- Total Politician Awareness. I suggest a group of hackers collect infomation -- LEGALLY -- regarding every congressman and senator, the cabinet, the heads of all government agencies -- in short, the decision makers. Post all this information to the web. I want to know where Sen. Bullshooter had lunch today. And I want to know who paid for that lunch. I want to know his investments. I want to know everything legally obtainable regarding the Sen. They think they're used to leading public lives. A dedicated group of hackers could put a serious hurting on their sense of privacy -- all, I stress, in the most legal manner. We'll see how the fuckers like TIA.

  18. Matrix is an accurate name... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...for a poorly conceived plan that makes less sense the more you think about it.

  19. The Matrix has you... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Oh crap. Ahmed - get the goats...we're leaving!

  20. Only hurt the innocent by margycdb · · Score: 3, Insightful
    "It would let authorities, for instance, instantly find the name and address of every brown-haired owner of a red Ford pickup truck in a 20-mile radius of a suspicious event."

    Things like this seem to me to only hurt the innocent. I mean, given that everyone can now read about this existing, any half-witted criminal would get a haircut, steal a new car and do something far away from home, right? I mean, if someone didn't take precautions such as these given this system, then they would probably be the type of criminal who would leave other evidence everywhere. This seems to have a ton of privacy implications and would target a lot of innocent people who, just say, happened to own red trucks or whatever the case may be, without targetting the actual criminals. What a waste. And they used my tax dollars to pay for a stupid, incorrect acronym, too. Grrr...

    1. Re:Only hurt the innocent by stratjakt · · Score: 2, Informative

      Psst.

      You can already do the exact same search through the DMV.

      During the DC sniper investigation, hundreds of people driving white vans were pulled over, searched and questioned. Thats how investigations work.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    2. Re:Only hurt the innocent by rusty0101 · · Score: 3, Informative

      I would think that the witch hunt for white trucks and vans during the Washington Sniper hunt would have created a large enough negative response to this that every state legislator would recognize the idiocy of being able to list all owners of such vehicles within a 10 mile radius of an incident.

      For those few who are not aware, the snipers were driving a blue Chevy Celebrity (large car) not a van or truck as initially indicated.

      I will leave it to others to document the problems the initial reports caused for people who had vehicles that matched the initial descriptions.

      -Rusty

      --
      You never know...
    3. Re:Only hurt the innocent by Doesn't_Comment_Code · · Score: 1

      I don't think this really hurts the innocent. True, they may be questioned. But if an inspector drops by the house of all 20 brown-haired owners of red Ford pickups in a 20 mile radius, just asking questions and noticing anything suspicious, that's not so bad. If they immediately ARRESTED all those people, that's something all together different. But just asking where you were, or if they could look at your truck isn't an invasion.

      And we also must remember, most criminals are dumb as bricks. There are a few criminal masterminds. But your average 7-11 robber couldn't outsmart a chicken. When an officer visits one of those people and starts asking questions, there's a very good chance they'll sweat like a pig, dart their eyes, and take off running. It's like they're yelling IT WAS ME! I DID IT! ARREST ME! When they stop by my house because a neighbor who looked like me robbed someone, I'll have nothing to worry about. The conversation will go something like:
      Where were you this morning at 8:45?
      At work.
      Can we call your boss?
      Yes
      Ok, thank you.

      Simple investigation is not an invasion of privacy. And this information has already been avaialable, this is just a speed increase.

      And people, don't forget. These are the tools the cops will be using to defend your homes and families. I live in a neighborhood where I'm kinda glad to see the cops swing by every once in a while. I've seen the people who get arrested, and they're not the kind of people you want around. And none of my neighbors or myself have never been pulled from our beds and strip searched at the station house.

      So before you go criticizing the cops, remember what they're doing and who they're doing it for. They have kids and wives too. If I want a faster computer to do my work, can't they have one too?

      --

      Slashdot Syndrome: the sudden, extreme urge to correct someone in order to validate one's self.
    4. Re:Only hurt the innocent by stratjakt · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So your saying if police have information that someone is randomly murdering people, possibly from a white van, they should do nothing about it?

      There was no "backlash". I live in the area, one of the shootings was a handful of blocks from my work. One of my coworkers in a light beige van was searched.

      The general opinion was "we'll do anything we can to help catch this lunatic", not "oh my god my rights are being infringed upon by the man".

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    5. Re:Only hurt the innocent by aziraphale · · Score: 1

      Never underestimate the stupidity of the average criminal. It is a sad fact that most crime is committed in the immediate neighborhood of the criminal.

      I think you're reading too much into this - nobody is going to be 'targetted' by this system. This is just data mining. Tying together databases they already have. They've got the DMV records that tell them vehicle make, model and color - so they can do a query to find all the vehicles that match a description; even if they don't have 'hair color' as a question on the driving license application, they have your driving license photo on file - so, they can have extracted hair color information from that. Then they tie the address information in to a geographical DB, along with the crime scene, and they've just got themselves a bunch of leads that might have taken weeks to track down otherwise.

      Look, the real problem here isn't that innocent people will get hassled by the cops. For serious crime - robbery, mugging, burglary, murder, rape - coincidental circumstantial evidence, with no prior record or other connection to the crime, and you'll be eliminated from the police's enquiries in a flash, unless nothing more promising shows up. For crimes that can be committed by anybody - DUI hit-and-run, for example - this gives the cops a great starting point for an enquiry that simply has to treat all people who match the description as suspects. If they can tie in surveillance camera footage and find out which direction the criminal's vehicle went, or enhance the image and grab the number plate, then so much the better. This isn't going to cause innocent motorists to get arrested - it's going to bring people to justice who wouldn't otherwise be caught.

      Anonymity - the ability to simply blend into the community and be an invisible drone - is not a particularly desirable consequence of modern lifestyles, let alone a right. A hundred years ago, everybody in a town knew everybody else, and something of their business. Just because you live in a big city, drive an anonymous car and live in an anonymous house, I don't see why it isn't society's business to pay a little bit of attention to what you get up to.

    6. Re:Only hurt the innocent by margycdb · · Score: 1

      You have a good point. I now agree with you. I think maybe I should get off of slashdot for a while. It's messing with my mind. (it's like everything you read here could be some masterminded conspiracy to invade your personal and privacy rights) Besides, there are much more important personal freedoms being denied right now via Patriot act and this just makes things that are already done faster. Thanks for bringing me back to earth :-)

    7. Re:Only hurt the innocent by rusty0101 · · Score: 1

      Might I point out that I did not say there was backlash. However because of the reports of the "white van or truck" the police apparently did not notice the vehicle that the sniper(s) did use even though they did stop the vehicle on at least one occasion.

      A more "reasonable" approach would have been to know which actual vehicles were in the area at the times of the shootings, and by process of elimination drop the total number of vehicles down to three or four by the third killing. However the resources needed for such knowledge aquisition are back up in the troubling range again.

      -Rusty

      --
      You never know...
    8. Re:Only hurt the innocent by morgue-ann · · Score: 4, Insightful

      coincidental circumstantial evidence, with no prior record or other connection to the crime, and you'll be eliminated from the police's enquiries in a flash,

      This, for me, is one of the major problems with TIA-esque systems.

      The abuses are:

      1) a cop harrasses his ex-wife's new boyfriend using TIA data

      2) government critics are harrassed

      3) innocents are convicted using a "web" of circumstantial evidence

      Maybe I watch too much Law & Order & C.S.I., but I do worry that someone with my general description and some other minor similarity: same brand of shoes or car, same point of debit card usage) along with proximity to a cell site near the crime at the time it's committed could be enough to lock me up. Means and opportunity, leaving only a thin motive to fabricate: pysch history, associates, financial issues, high school "permanent record" (corroborated with testimony from a vice principal).

      They seem to be able to get bank records phone LUDs and FastPass usage without subpoaenas and use this probably cause to get search warrants.

      #2 is what I see as the greatest threat to society at large, but I'm not that outspoken, so it's #3 I worry about personally.

    9. Re:Only hurt the innocent by curtisk · · Score: 1
      For those few who are not aware, the snipers were driving a blue Chevy Celebrity (large car) not a van or truck as initially indicated.

      That is one point of that whole investigation that drove me nuts! They kept emphasizing the "white van" in press conferences and media. The Snipers probably said..."hey, let's use this...." and when they were waiting for a victim, they could have also waited for a white van to be near the victim, POW! "I saw the white van, i saw the white van!!" Perpetuating the myth.

      --

      Sehr geehrter Toilettenbenutzer!

    10. Re:Only hurt the innocent by PizzaFace · · Score: 1

      You must have watched too many Dragnet reruns. In the 21st century, here is how it works:

      You are awakened at 4:00 a.m. by a battering ram smashing down your front door. Before you are out of bed, you are surrounded by troops in body armor pointing machine guns at you and your wife. As they carry your computers and filing cabinets out to their van and ransack your dresser drawers, they tell you that they know from their database about your terrorist associations. No, of course they won't tell you what they know, because they don't reveal their intelligence to terrorists. You protest your innocence and demand your phone call to your attorney. Very funny! Terrorists get neither phone calls nor attorneys. Remember to tell your wife you love her as they take you out the door, because you won't be talking to her again for the foreseeable future. She won't even know where you are.

      Read the newspaper. Terrorists, suspected terrorists, and suspected associates of suspected terrorists have no rights. A larger database generates more suspicions, a fixed percentage of which are erroneous. In the land of Bush, Rumsfeld and Ashcroft, your innocence does not protect you.

    11. Re:Only hurt the innocent by Doesn't_Comment_Code · · Score: 1

      Read the newspaper. Terrorists, suspected terrorists, and suspected associates of suspected terrorists have no rights. A larger database generates more suspicions, a fixed percentage of which are erroneous. In the land of Bush, Rumsfeld and Ashcroft, your innocence does not protect you.

      Read the article. Its not a larger database. It's the same information they've always had.

      Read the article, its not Bush, Rumsfel, or Ashcroft. It's the state of Florida.

      Once you hammer out all the facts, its not nearly so dramatic.

      Law enforcement officers don't query their database for a list of people to arrest and lockup indefinately, now matter how much you may like to think so. That is how they start their investigations. They get leads that way, all but one of which are wrong. That's how it's always been. They don't get everybody on the list. The list is there because there's a good chance that the one they're looking for is on the list.

      --

      Slashdot Syndrome: the sudden, extreme urge to correct someone in order to validate one's self.
    12. Re:Only hurt the innocent by Tackhead · · Score: 1
      > In the 21st century, here is how it works:
      >
      > You are awakened at 4:00 a.m. by a battering ram smashing down your front door.

      Yes, every once in a while, there's a bad apple, and once in a while there's "Whups, sorry! Wrong house!", but that goes for any industry. Sometimes people write backdoors, and sometimes they just didn't check the length of the damn string, and people get 0wn3d.

      Some months after moving into a new apartment, I got a visit from the local constabulary. Although the cops were indeed prepared to force entry (two guys on backup behind the wall, one guy knocking the door, one guy backing up door-knocking guy, all in flak jackets), the conversation went remarkably like what the previous poster's example.

      It was a simple case of mistaken identity - they had the right address, but the warrant was so old that the bad guy had long left town. Once they realized I wasn't the droid they were looking for (and they probably realized it a lot sooner than I did :-), I didn't even have to show papers to prove I'd been the only one in the apartment for $TIMESPAN.

      "Naw, it's OK, sir, we believe you. Sorry to have bothered you, sir."
      "No problem, officer. No harm, no foul. Stay safe."

      I used to be like you. That night changed a thing - for the first time in my life, I had first-hand unfiltered data about cops, and I had to rethink my assumptions.

      I concluded that 99.999% of the cop business isn't what you see in Orwellian dystopian sci-fi novels. In fact, it can't be, even if (some) cops might like the idea. They're outnumbered 1000:1. With odds like that, a good night is one in which, even if mistakes get made and a bad guy gets away, everybody goes home in one piece.

      It's a rare day that a cop is your friend (at least, I'd hope that you rarely get into automobile accidents or are mugged/robbed within earshot of one!), but the probability that a cop your enemy is astronomically smaller.

    13. Re:Only hurt the innocent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your assumption is that they have a suspect (brown hair, white van) and so they do a search of all the distributed databases for that.

      You ever hear of a slow newsday? Do you think reporters simply wait to hear something interesting and then go investigate it? Hell, no. They poll their sources and look for some interesting dirt.

      If you're a law enforcement officer who is evaluated on collars, are you just going to let that huge, tempting pile of databases sit around? Hell no. If you're having a slow week, you're going to enter the following, "SELECT * FROM * WHERE (organizations=EFF,PITA,LPA) AND (car=VWBug) AND (magazine_subscriptions=2600) AND (age < 26) AND (gun_owner=TRUE)." Now you've got a list of people with arguably anti-establishment (read terrorist) tendancies. So now you go on your fishing expedition and start knocking on doors. You're bound to knock on at least one door where you catch a whiff of pot, and there's your probable cause and your collar for the day.

      Are you seriously naive enough to think that all law enforcement officers have the same values and morals as you? Even given the set of all those who would not knowingly do something illegal or wrong, the majority of that set, I believe, thinks that as long as they get the bad guy, they are golden. And they determine who the bad guy is, by the way.

      I have known a lot of cops. Everyone I've ever known (and I am not exagerating) has made jokes about using more than necessary force against people. They honestly feel they are right, that they have the right guy, that the guy did something wrong (even before the trial), and that it is justice to pop the guy a few extra times. All the cops I have ever known feel that, in a sense, they are the law, not just law enforcement. I'm not saying that all cops are bad. Far from it. What I am telling you is that even good cops think that what they do is okay since they have good intentions. If you give them a tool, they will use it according to their personal judgement. The law is not about personal judgement.

      You are a goddamned fucking idiot. If anonymity "is not a particularly desirable consequence of modern lifestyles," the post your goddmaned address and phone number. Come on, big boy, pony up. Come on, tough guy. What are you afraid of? If you don't post your address and phone number and social security number, one could believe you're a terrorist or a pedophile. I don't think you are those things, though, so I know you'll post all that information.

      You suck.

    14. Re:Only hurt the innocent by CGP314 · · Score: 1

      innocents are convicted using a "web" of circumstantial evidence

      This is what scares the shit out of me. In college I dual majored in physics and sociology. If the government looks over my book purchasing habits, they will see titles like 'The Communist Manifesto', 'A People's History', and 'Nuclear Physics' not to mention books on other 'dangerous' topics like biology, chemistry, and electronics. That doesn't look too good now does it? In addition, I have traveled to places like China and Istanbul. Oh yeah, I also have an Irish passport in addition to my US one.

      Any one of these things can be explained, but put them all together, and some FBI guy who doesn't understand that I'm just smart and like to read thinks I'm a terrorist.

      I have recently moved to London, and I'm not sure I'm going to move back.

    15. Re:Only hurt the innocent by autopr0n · · Score: 1

      During the DC sniper investigation, hundreds of people driving white vans were pulled over, searched and questioned. That's how investigations work.

      Yeah, and the real snipers were driving a blue Chevy, and were actually pulled over and noted by the police eight times before they were finally captured.

      I mean I just assumed they were checking all the cars that showed up more then once in their dragnets or whatever. I was shocked when I found out they hadn't been. (I'd been wondering how the snipers had managed to keep getting away so quickly...)

      Good enough for government work. In the mean time hundreds of people were turned in for weapons charges, and some illegal immigrants in a white van were deported.

      --
      autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    16. Re:Only hurt the innocent by autopr0n · · Score: 1

      Hum...

      So the cops are so incompetent that they almost broke down your door, but you decided that you like cops now because they were polite? If you were a Texas fag a gettin' it on a they still could have busted you for sodimy a couple of months ago. What if you had been smoking weed or something? Would they still have been so polite?

      A couple weeks ago a friend of mine had a very different experience with the cops. They came to a house she was at and started questioning her about a friend of theirs, a black guy, who they had said robbed a bank and wanted to search the house for him. It turns out he had been arrested for public intox and they wanted to nab a couple more stoners.

      And how the hell can you say the odds are a thousand to one when you've only had one experience. You could only reasonably make that claim if you'd had a thousand and one run-ins with them, dumbass. Learn you some stat.

      --
      autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    17. Re:Only hurt the innocent by Dyolf+Knip · · Score: 1

      That's because "get the guy driving around shooting innocent people" is the sort of motivation the average citizen can get on board with. Does anyone here think that governmental use of power over people is always limited to things like finding violent criminals? Anyone? Or is the government really made up of ordinary people who will use and abuse any kind of power they are given?

      --
      Dyolf Knip
  21. Re:It's j00st L1k3 d4 M4tR1X!!! OMG LOLZ!!!111 by Atticu5 · · Score: 0

    In soviet russia, the Matrix jokes about you!

    (I can feel my karma dropping.)

  22. Hot Florida Weather by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In other news, the high in Miami is expected to reach 92; please drink more Powerade. Thank you for your cooperation.

  23. Whither SCMODS? by shoppa · · Score: 1

    Whatever happened to the grandaddy of all govt information systems, SCMODS = State County Municipal Offender Data System?

    1. Re:Whither SCMODS? by aziraphale · · Score: 1

      It died because its acronym wasn't cool enough to play with the big boys.

    2. Re:Whither SCMODS? by mrkurt · · Score: 1

      It has probably been supplanted by the NCIC database, which is used by law enforcement agencies in every jurisdiction.

      M.A.T.R.I.X. appears to go far beyond what's in NCIC, which is a database of wanted felons or felony suspects. It essentially is an implementation of Total Information Awareness on the state level. It figures that Bushie's brother Jebuzon would be overseeing its implementation, but the article also states that Sen. Bob Graham-- a presidential candidate and a leading critic of the federal government's handling of the intelligence they had surrounding the 9/11 attacks-- was also consulted while this system was being created.

      --
      Always look on the briight side of life! (whistle, whistle)
    3. Re:Whither SCMODS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod this guy WAY UP for the Blues Brothers reference!!!

  24. Family Ties... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Honestly, you need not look very hard to find the correlation between current administration's family ties, and crazy stuff gotting backdoored through state legislation as opposed to national. Conspirists will have a field day!

  25. Re:I want cameras on every street and ID cards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But the ID cards should not be cards, but those big "HELLO My Name Is [your name here]" tags.

  26. Re:If they call this the matrix, who will be neo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not Zeus, dumbass. Zion. If your going to make a funny Matrix comment, at least get the names right!

  27. time to.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    pack up yo shit folks, it's time to go.

    Welcome to Microsoft passport, where would you like to go...flee today?

  28. M.A.T.R.I.X ? by antv · · Score: 1

    Tell me Mr. Anderson, what good is your privacy if you're considered a terrorist in your state ?

    --
    Obama 2012: our incompetent asshole is slightly less of an incompetent asshole than the other incompetent asshole !
  29. Remember by stratjakt · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Information wants to be free.

    Oh, except to law enforcement.

    You are all hypocrites.

    This shit already exists, this is no different from existing systems like NIBRS or MILES. Everyone's out to either reinvent the wheel or bitch about it.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    1. Re:Remember by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Information wants to be free.

      Oh, except to law enforcement.


      Exactly. What is your problem?

      Information wants to be free for humans and citizens, who must do their best to keep it out of the hands of criminals and animals.

    2. Re:Remember by sirbone · · Score: 1

      As I believe Ayn Rand once said, "The government has a legal monopoly on the use of force against a legally disarmed public." (I'm probably misquoting that from memory, so I apologize if it's not exact.) When one talks about government the rules change. One needs to act so that this monopoly on legal force does not get abused. There is a big difference between free information used for non-coersive cooperation between free people versus free information used for involuntairy coersion from the entity holding the legal monopoly on force.

      --
      "The State is that great fiction by which everyone lives at the expense of everyone else." -Frederic Bastiat.
  30. Fat Floridians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought TIA (transitorisk ischemisk attack) was the thing you got when you ate to much fat food..

  31. and all I thought of was "The Blues Brothers" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Elwood: "I bet those cops have got SCMODS."

    Jake: "SCMODS?"

    Elwood: "State. County. Municipal. Offender. Data. System."

    At least Florida didn't infringe on the copyright.

    And, hey, isn't Jeb Bush the governor of that cesspool of a state? No concidence there. No...

  32. THE MATRIX HAS YOU! by SharpFang · · Score: 1

    Morpheus was considered a dangerous terrorist, wasn't he?
    And the legal status of the agents (as "citizens" of the world simulated by The Matrix) was something like CIA or FBI, wasn't it?

    Wake up, neo! The MATRIX has you!
    We should feel obligated to oppose it!

    --
    45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
  33. Many states have this... by BJZQ8 · · Score: 1

    Many states give their officers down to the individual department level access to all sorts of information...types of information on people that have committed absolutely no crime that would make the hardest-line reactionary cringe. They give them mobile data terminals and allow them to view this whenever they want, and for whatever reason they want. Even though there are "laws" against using it against innocent people, it is a minute-by-minute occurence. I know people in the police force that check people just because they don't like them, or think it's funny to spread dirt around on them.

    1. Re:Many states have this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I've been pulled over by a bored police officer who decided to run my plates. I didn't know there was a wrong fact in the computer. The judge dropped the fine, but I hate police now. I wasn't aware I was committing a crime. It wasn't my car and my girlfriend (now wife) did not know there was a problem either (her car).

      Just the other day an officer ran my plates. We were sitting at a red light facing each other, so he ran them. At least I know I'm safe for a while, since he didn't go after me.

      If the computer thinks I'm commiting a crime, why not just send me mail. I'm not hiding. I'm listed in the phone book.

      Is this really the way people want to live? Fearing the police because you never know what's on the computer. I'm far more afraid of the police than terrorist.

      --
      me

  34. Re:I want cameras on every street and ID cards by sploxx · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Putting it that extreme way is short sighted, to be polite.

    Having not total control over every citizen almost certainly leads to more crime by the people, but that is the cost of more freedom. More control to the government and you have almost certainly more crimes by the government/and or companies.

    And they will probably hurt us citizens more in the long term. Want examples? Google for yourself, or ask. But I'm too lazy to write them all down here.

    IMHO law enforcement should be more effective and should not work by gathering information about everyone and then doing some data mining.

  35. S.L.A.S.H.D.O.T by civilengineer · · Score: 1

    do they have to try hard to find such apt names for their projects or does it come naturally?

    S.L.A.S.H.D.O.T ---->
    simple linux appreciation site - have dicey open talk

    --

    New year Resolution: Don't change sig this year
    1. Re:S.L.A.S.H.D.O.T by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I prefer:

      S.tupid
      L.inux
      A.sshats
      S.lam
      H.aldol
      D.oin g
      O.rganized
      T.errorism

    2. Re:S.L.A.S.H.D.O.T by Theaetetus · · Score: 1
      Heh.
      Not "Some Lazy Asshat Submits His Dupes On Tuesdays"? (Just kiddin', editors!)

      -T

  36. This systems should still have safeguards by chrisgeleven · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I don't know the procedure to get permission to find all brown haired people that own Fords within 50 miles, but I would think there has to be some kind of safeguards to prevent random lookups without reason. For example, to look up this information the police would need to get authorization from the Chief, the Sheriff, and Judge. Combine it with fingerprints, eye scans, smart cards, whatever.

    If anyone can go to a computer, type in their search criteria, and come up with that info, it will be abused. If more then 1 person has to authorize it in a way that cuts down on the chances of abuse, then I'm all for such a system.

  37. Hmm by borgasm · · Score: 4, Informative

    In 1999, the Drug Enforcement Administration and the FBI suspended information service contracts with an earlier Asher-run company because of concerns about his past, according to law enforcement sources. The Chicago Tribune reported in 1987 that court documents in a federal drug case said defense lawyer F. Lee Bailey, who identified Asher as a pilot and onetime smuggler, offered him as an informant.
    Jennie Khoen, a spokeswoman for the Florida department, said yesterday that the agency knew about Asher's "history with drug smuggling," including his work as an informant. Moore said his department "knew about Mr. Asher's past."


    Maybe Asher can watch the fox guarding the hen house while he's at it....

    1. Re:Hmm by TheSteve · · Score: 1

      Speaking of Mr. Asher's past, let's not forget that another of his companies, Database Technologies (now DBT Online) provided the voter lists for Florida during the 2000 U.S. Presidential election, believed to have been purged of about 57,700 eligible voters that were incorrectly identified as felons. It was said that of the 80% of these voters that would have gone to the polls, 90% of them would have voted for Al Gore.

      A DBT vice-president, Martin L. Fagan, was quoted as saying "Given the outcome of our work in Florida and with a new president in place, we think our services will expand across the country."

    2. Re:Hmm by cheezedawg · · Score: 1

      believed to have been purged of about 57,700 eligible voters that were incorrectly identified as felons.

      Incorrect. There were 57,700 names total on the list, and some unknown percentage of that were not actually felons. But that is beside the point- being on the list did not mean you were purged from the voter registration, it only meant that the individual county elections supervisors might attempt to verify your eligibility to vote (many counties ignored the list completely).

      In fact, when the Federal Elections Commission held hearings on the Florida election, they couldn't find a single eligible person that was prevented from voting because of the ChoicePoint/DBT felon list.

      --
      "The defense of freedom requires the advance of freedom" - George W Bush
  38. M.A.T.R.I.X?? by Cyberllama · · Score: 0, Redundant

    How exactly do they get MATRIX from Multistate Anti-Terrorism Information Exchange? There are about twenty things wrong with that.

    For starters, it stands for MATIE. Which, if you think about it, would make peoples reactions to the project all the more apt sounding (Argh! MATIE!). Which brings me to yet another interesting point, where on earth did they get the "R" in matrix. I can kinda see taking the second character of exchange as the "x", making it x-change or something equally stupid, but I can't for the life of me figure out where they snagged an "R" from.

    Second of all, shouldn't multi-state be hyphonated like anti-terrorism is? This seeems like a conveinant misuses of punctuation. Would it really have ruined their day just to call it MSATIE instead of MATRIX? Did they truly need that extra layer of irony built into the name?

    1. Re:M.A.T.R.I.X?? by mcp33p4n75 · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing Multistate Anti-TeRrorism Information eXchange. I just can't wait until matriXP.

  39. Florida? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't this the same Florida that is currently ruled by Jeb Bush, the president's brother? Why do I get images of late-night meetings between Ashcroft, Tenet, and the Bushes in a cigar-smoke filled room?

    Be afraid, folks. History is full of examples of the feds trying to pass hideous legislation, facing public backlash, and then sneaking it into law anyway by going through the states. If you think this is all Florida's initiative and there has been no pressure from the feds, you're more than a little bit naive.

  40. Great! by Azureash · · Score: 0

    Another Big Brother system conceived by a criminal.

    I think its time for Congress to shut down the Department of Homeland Security, nevermind just TIA.

    --
    Look at my karma - I'm bad, just like Michael Jackson!
  41. Nope! by JCMay · · Score: 1

    TIA == The Internet Adapter, popular about ten years ago.

    1. Re:Nope! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TIA == The Internet Adapter, popular about ten years ago.

      Hah, TIA was for lusers, real geeks used slirp.

    2. Re:Nope! by JCMay · · Score: 1

      Actually when I was at Georgia Tech (1989-1995), slirp wasn't available and many of use used TIA (on Acme even!). I know I bought a TIA licence. Notice that the slirp page was from September, 1995; I graduated March 95.

  42. Agreement? by W33dz · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Although I hate to say it, I have to say that they have a good point here. The need for a tool to help law enforcement is unquestioned. The only problem that most of us seem to have is the use of this tool.
    The states already have access to all this data. The only difference now is that they will be able to access it more quickly. I cannot see how that will be any worse than what we already have.
    Unfortunately, what we already have is proof that this tool will not be used in the utopian manner than the designers intend. Instead, it will be used by police forces to highlight people that they feel are suspects (because they meet some predetermined criteria). They will then seek to examine these folks to determine if they are associated with the crime they are investigating. Of course, if they happen to stumble across some other "crime" while they investigate they can get two for the price of one.
    Is it needed in the short term? Yes, I hate to say it, but I think that it is.
    Is it the correct solution in the long run? Perhaps, but not right now. Not with the "Big Brother" mentality that seems to be gripping the law enforcement community.

    --
    We are Pentium of Borg. Division is futile. You will be approximated.
  43. with info like this... by Connie_Lingus · · Score: 1

    It would let authorities, for instance, instantly find the name and address of every brown-haired owner of a red Ford pickup truck in a 20-mile radius of a suspicious event ...and we all know that terrorists would *never* consider wearing a wig when they decide to poison our water supply.

    --
    never bring a twinkie to a food fight.
    1. Re:with info like this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or *gasp* steal a Ford pickup truck

  44. All Matrix Jokes Aside by Badgerman · · Score: 1

    Calling this thing MATRIX *DOES* show a particular level of incompetence behind it.

    Seriously. They chose a name guaranteed to provoke the most adverse reactions in many people, especially geeks. This indicates either a level of insensitivity or ignorance of popular culture that isn't reassuring.

    --
    "The Sage treasures Unity and measures all things by it" - Lao Tzu
    1. Re:All Matrix Jokes Aside by lightcycle · · Score: 1

      Perhaps they Matrix would bring up reactions along the lines of "Matrix was that cool movie, with that cool guy fighting for enlightenment and ... uhm... blowing stuff up! Surely this must be a cool law!" Sadly I don't think, among the general poulace, that this is too far fetched, although geeks see through it. It's among the same lines of a Skynet killer drone running for guvenor in California, and actually having quite good chances of winning.

      --

      The stars that shine and the stars that shrink
      in the face of stagnation the water runs before your eyes
    2. Re:All Matrix Jokes Aside by Tackhead · · Score: 1
      > It's among the same lines of a Skynet killer drone running for guvenor in California, and actually having quite good chances of winning.

      Whaddya mean, "good chance of winning"? Gray Davis won!

  45. Why I'm just waiting for The One by gatesh8r · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I won't join any organizations like the ACLU to protect my freedoms! NO! I'm going to be an armchair critic and let the government erode my freedoms!

    --
    Karma whorin' since 1999
    1. Re:Why I'm just waiting for The One by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While I, on the other hand will join the NRA, the EFF and arm myself with a few firearms and a couple hundred rounds of ammo. :D

    2. Re:Why I'm just waiting for The One by praedor · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Nice troll and quite off-topic, but I'll bite. You are free to practice YOUR religion publicly. What you CANNOT do is, in ANY way, compel ANYONE else to partake or live according to your religion. You also cannot use the blanket of the government (not state nor federal) in an attempt to try to enshrine your religion into official recognition, special standing, or official policy or law. Your religion is YOURS, not mine, not your neighbor's, just yours. You and your ignorant kids are quite able to be religious lunatics all they want. You (and they) simply cannot get official sanction or the ability to force others into your way of (non)thinking.

      --
      In Bushworld, they struggle to keep church and state separate in Iraq as they increasingly merge the two in America.
    3. Re:Why I'm just waiting for The One by Triv · · Score: 2, Informative

      I won't join the ACLU because they seem rather keen on taking away my freedoms, such as the freedoms of my children to practice their religion in public places.

      You got proof that the ACLU has tried to do that? I'd like to see it. We ARE talking about the same ACLU that stood up for a website the federal government claims incited a murder, right? The same ACLU that defended the KKK? I can believe they campaigned against kids being LED in prayer in public schools, but I highly doubt they tried to ban how they choose to express their faith.

      Triv

    4. Re:Why I'm just waiting for The One by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How does a nativity scene force my religion upon you?

      How does protecting child molestors(NAMBLA) protect civil liberties? Their website offers such tips as "how to keep the boy from talking to police". Their goal: "The liberation of boy-lovers".

    5. Re:Why I'm just waiting for The One by isaac · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I won't join the ACLU because they seem rather keen on taking away my freedoms, such as the freedoms of my children to practice their religion in public places.

      Sorry? Anyone can practice their religion in public places to the extent that they do not coerce others into their religious practice. Every public school I went to had religious clubs and bible study groups.

      I only objected once, in middle school, when attendence at bible study was effectively mandatory. There was a Baptist preacher who came in every morning to "share the good news" by preaching in the auditorium where students who took the bus were forced to wait for classes to begin. He even singled out non-christian students like myself (I guess the name "Isaac" was a dead giveaway) and called on other students to "help" me "accept Jesus Christ into [my] heart." Maybe you consider that acceptable religious practice; iIfound it coercive. I don't object to proselytizing unless I'm being forced by the state to listen to it (remember this was a public school). I didn't sue, but you'd better believe that my parents complained to the school administration. After that, the bible study was made optional and moved to a separate room - everybody was happy.

      Just my 2c, but I think your concerns about your children's religious freedoms being "taken away" are overblown, absent any specific example.

      -Isaac

      --
      I am not a lawyer, and this is not legal advice. For Entertainment Purposes Only.
    6. Re:Why I'm just waiting for The One by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the ACLU really cared for contributions from everyone they would seperate their semi-autonomous funds so people can really vest in areas they feel need protection. I for one won't give money to an organization who uses it to harass the boy scouts of america rather than protect free speech.

      I'm not saying people shouldn't, but there are reasons why the ACLU isn't popular.. they have a let's piss everyone off attitude.

    7. Re:Why I'm just waiting for The One by ianscot · · Score: 1
      I for one won't give money to an organization who uses it to harass the boy scouts of america rather than protect free speech.

      Whereas I, for another variation, withdrew from all fundraising for the scouts after they went out of the way to harass my lesbian friends who just wanted to be den leaders for their two little boys. In my book the ACLU had the kids' interests at heart more than the scouts did, on that one...

      there are reasons why the ACLU isn't popular.. they have a let's piss everyone off attitude.

      The ACLU is largely about defending unpopular speech, in a lot of different veins. That's what you're identifying as their "let's piss everyone off" attitude. You expected them to only defend the popular points of view, is that it?

      --
      "Fundamentalism" isn't about divine morality. It's about human authority.
    8. Re:Why I'm just waiting for The One by praedor · · Score: 1

      NAMBLA is, by definition, a bunch of supremely perverted freaks...but freaks STILL have a right to free speech no matter what. You cannot silence them and not lead to a road where other, "offensive" speech is also OK for banning. You can't.


      Their behavior can be stopped and prosecuted but you cannot silence their free speech rights.


      As for nativity...it has no meaning to me, as it depicts myth and nonsense. That said, you cannot OK nativity and not also allow, equally, ANY other religious nonsense from being "officially" displayed either, including wiccan, buddhist, shinto, voodoo, muslim, moonie...each EQUALLY "legitimate" religions (as far as the word legitimate can be stretched for ANY religion) and equally deserving of the SAME rights as nativity believers. Also, you have to allow for atheist displays alongside too. Sorry, you cannot have special display status for the one on official government territory/property and not give equal status to any and all other religious displays. Anything else means government sanctioned religion or government sponsored religion, or "official" religion.


      Here's what I find most ironic about this crap... Thomas Jefferson created the "wall between church and state" in order to secure support for the Constitution, etc, from Baptists who feared the Catholic's would take power. Who is it, by and large, who is now all in favor of removing the wall between church and state? The goddamned BAPTISTS and other like-minded loons. It is BAAAAD if those Papists have government control but A-OK if WE have control.


      The absolute wall must remain, period, or you get one of two things (usually both depending on when the revolution starts up): a Taliban-like insane government rife with civil rights violations or sectarian violence and fighting. Religion and government mixing means both and therefore, old Thomas was absolutely right. The strict wall must remain unbroken.

      --
      In Bushworld, they struggle to keep church and state separate in Iraq as they increasingly merge the two in America.
    9. Re:Why I'm just waiting for The One by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not at all. What I'm saying is that the ACLU must defend those actions but my contributions are not going to contribute to destruction of an organization I fully support. While the Boy Scouts of America may be in the wrong, they are clearly not violating the constitution.

      However, I'm fond of the ACLU in many other ways and would contribute but these actions are wholey unacceptable. It's like, I contribute, and the ACLU can use the dues however they like? I prefer a little more control since the ACLU is so broad.

    10. Re:Why I'm just waiting for The One by geekoid · · Score: 1

      You are more likly to get people to listen to you if you didn't bad on religon while making your point.

      I agree with your point, but most people will immdeiatly dismiss you as an anti-religous zealot.

      By the way, there are rules the government uses to determine if an orginization is a religeon. Granted, there loose and require a court to judge on a case be case situation, but they do exist.

      For example, the church of scientology pays taxes because the government determined that they are not quilified as a religeon.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    11. Re:Why I'm just waiting for The One by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'twas spew'ed:

      > compel ANYONE else to partake or live according to your religion.

      Haven't lived near southern baptists or any of the door-to-door religions, have you?

    12. Re:Why I'm just waiting for The One by praedor · · Score: 1

      The scientology thing is kind of a funny one. Though they pay taxes (rightfully, not being a "true" religion) they are benefiting, me thinks, from the Bushie nonsense about paying religious groups to do what should rightfully be government social support work. Perhaps I am misremembering...didn't scientology get government (tax) dollars to do social support? Or perhaps it was just Tom Cruise Missile trying to get monies on behalf of scientology (while seeking aid in squelching the official anti-scientology legal rulings in Europe/Germany)?


      As I recall, this was precisely one of the very things warned about when Bushie came up with the idiotic idea of giving government funds to religious orgs to do social service work in lieu of the government. And it is coming to pass. The loons are getting money for being looney and spreading the lunacy.

      --
      In Bushworld, they struggle to keep church and state separate in Iraq as they increasingly merge the two in America.
    13. Re:Why I'm just waiting for The One by Nodatadj · · Score: 1

      > It is BAAAAD if those Papists have government
      > control but A-OK if WE have control.

      I'd say you could even generalise it even more to "It is BAAAAD if they have government control, but A-OK if WE have control."

      We need to stop seeing the world as them and us.
      Its tearing us all apart.

    14. Re:Why I'm just waiting for The One by Sinistar2k · · Score: 1

      I joined the ACLU in the aftermatch of 9/11. And my junk mail quadrupled because both Bill Clinton and the Dalai Lama felt oblgied to personally plead with me for financial support.

      When it came time to re-donate, I said no and let them know that I didn't join an organization to fight for my privacy just to have them hand out my address to every charity in the country.

      So be an armchair critic. Joining the ACLU sucks.

    15. Re:Why I'm just waiting for The One by gantzm · · Score: 1

      a couple hundred rounds of ammo.

      Couple hundred? Man, I probably have that much rolling around loose in the back of the couch.

      --


      Excessive forking causes un-wanted children.
    16. Re:Why I'm just waiting for The One by gantzm · · Score: 1

      How does a nativity scene force my religion upon you?

      Example: Local government alows a group to display a nativity scene in the city park, no problem. The local Druids see this display and decide "We should be able to honor the Great Oak with our display." City government says "No way, you suck with your Great Oak". At this point the local government has violated the separation of church and state by indirectly endorsing a particular religion.

      --


      Excessive forking causes un-wanted children.
    17. Re:Why I'm just waiting for The One by ChristTrekker · · Score: 1

      That's not government-backed compulsion, is it? Everyone has the freedom to speak, and if you don't like the message, you can tell them to leave your property. The restrictions that the 1st Amendment places on government do not apply to individuals. Those restrictions are there to protect individuals to do the very sorts of things you mention.

    18. Re:Why I'm just waiting for The One by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is such a good point. I live in Florida and work with a group of conservative guys. Not too long ago they were griping about the ACLU. Then one day they found out that the Fl's DMV was selling private information unless we opted out. (Don't believe me? Goto http://www.hsmv.state.fl.us/ddl/DPPAInfo.html
      and check it out). When I told the guys from work that the ACLU was taking this up(http://www.aclu.org/Privacy/Privacy.cfm?ID=8388 &c=40) suddenly the ACLU was their best friend. My point is about nature: when your rights aren't being trampled, why give a shit about someone else who is getting knocked down? ANSWER: BECAUSE NEXT TIME IT COULD BE YOU.

  46. Acronym: by wowbagger · · Score: 5, Informative


    Acronym
    Main Entry: acronym
    Pronunciation: 'a-kr&-"nim
    Function: noun
    Etymology: acr- + -onym
    Date: 1943
    : a word (as NATO, radar, or snafu) formed from the initial letter or letters of each of the successive parts or major parts of a compound term.
    (emphasis mine).

    M.A.T.R.I.X is not an acronym.

    1. Re:Acronym: by robson · · Score: 1

      M.A.T.R.I.X is not an acronym.

      So maybe that should be the new name -- MINA. "MATRIX Is Not an Acronym".

    2. Re:Acronym: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, that's just an embedded acronym, and you still have to define MATRIX. Besides, it's no fun if it's not recursive. It should be "MINA Is Not an Acronym".

    3. Re:Acronym: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... though since it spells a word, it's more like an actual acronym than many other things that commonly get called acronyms.

  47. Re:It's j00st L1k3 d4 M4tR1X!!! OMG LOLZ!!!111 by Phreakiture · · Score: 1

    7. Profit!

    --
    www.wavefront-av.com
  48. Compromise by stratjakt · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Will you all feel better if they promise to use Open Source Free-as-in-Willy software?

    MySQL is robust enough now that they could track at least 3 dozen people, give or take.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  49. Corruption is out of control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Guess who is developing this system ?

    Seisint

    guess who is the number 12 campaign contributer to the republicans ? who just got awarded 1.6million (with more to follow)

    Seisint

    im not American but it looks like your goverment is doomed to failure with all this corruption, and people wonder why the dollar aint worth shit

    enjoy cos you aint gonna do anything about it, oh except get poor while Bush and his buddies ensure they will never have to work again in their lives EVER

    i want to feel sorry but i can't

    1. Re:Corruption is out of control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go back to Bangladesh, you piece of shit.

    2. Re:Corruption is out of control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least until Russians take jobs away from you. Then the world will get to watch you bitch and moan about how unfair it is for you. Why should anyone give a shit? An eye for an eye, motherfucker.

      Your people are a plague on the earth, not just the US. Your countries should be wiped from the face of the planet.

  50. hmm by jav1231 · · Score: 1

    So if shared by computer would they call it CompTIA? (okay, that was bad.) JAV

  51. No Back Doors, Really by PizzaFace · · Score: 4, Informative
    From the Washington Post:

    The Matrix project began soon after the 2001 attacks. Seisint founder Hank Asher, a wealthy data entrepreneur, called Florida police and claimed he could pinpoint the hijackers and others who might pose a risk of terrorist activity. "Asher says, 'I'll develop this for free,' " Ramer said.

    Working without a contract or pay, Asher set about creating the system in Florida, Ramer said. "We showed it to the other states, and the other states went nuts." ...

    In 1999, the Drug Enforcement Administration and the FBI suspended information service contracts with an earlier Asher-run company because of concerns about his past, according to law enforcement sources. The Chicago Tribune reported in 1987 that court documents in a federal drug case said defense lawyer F. Lee Bailey, who identified Asher as a pilot and onetime smuggler, offered him as an informant.

    Jennie Khoen, a spokeswoman for the Florida department, said yesterday that the agency knew about Asher's "history with drug smuggling," including his work as an informant.
    1. Re:No Back Doors, Really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This guy has a good plan, he is making sure the system that will be used against him is designed by him. Either backdoors in or just basic filters he can use, he is thinking ahead.

    2. Re:No Back Doors, Really by BigBadBri · · Score: 1
      Not surprising really - the Cali cartel was doing something similar back in the 1990s.

      It's regarded as a bit of a myth, but there is some evidence to support it.

      --
      oh brave new world, that has such people in it!
  52. This am Florida. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We dont spel to good

  53. Airport credit & medical check for every passe by peter303 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Last week the news said airlines were looking at the credit agency and medical insurance reports of every passenger. People with low credit scroes were flagged for additional scrutiny. I guess because these are easy databases to access, not because they are informative.

  54. Most folks in FL are safe from from goons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There aren't too many 8-year-old Cuban refugees...

  55. Re:fb? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And you have to fail it.

  56. Makes me sad by stevedc2000 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    The more schemes like this that come along, the more I realize that the terrorists that were behind the World Trade Center and Pentagon attrocities have, in fact, achieved some of their aims.

    The US (and other western nations) are slowly, but surely, relieving the average citizen of their privacy rights in the interests of 'the war on terror' (such as it is). And of course, it's is our very freedoms (in many things) that the terrorists want to take away - to make us afraid...

    I don't know what the future holds, but worlds such as those portrayed in films like 'Minority Report' don't seem so far fetched anymore..

    1. Re:Makes me sad by Doesn't_Comment_Code · · Score: 1

      And of course, it's is our very freedoms (in many things) that the terrorists want to take away - to make us afraid...

      But what freedoms did you just lose? If you hadn't read slashdot today would you be able to tell that Florida was using a database? I don't think you would. In fact, this system has been running in various forms for quite some time.

      There is no guarenteed right to other people not knowing publicly available facts. Heck, there isn't even a right to privacy in the Constitution. I can still go speak out against any senator/president/governor I want. I still work where I want and spend my money how I want. I don't beleive we've just lost any freedoms.

      --

      Slashdot Syndrome: the sudden, extreme urge to correct someone in order to validate one's self.
    2. Re:Makes me sad by cellocgw · · Score: 1
      But what freedoms did you just lose? If you hadn't read slashdot today would you be able to tell that Florida was using a database? I don't think you would. In fact, this system has been running in various forms for quite some time. There is no guarenteed right to other people not knowing publicly available facts. Heck, there isn't even a right to privacy in the Constitution. I can still go speak out against any senator/president/governor I want. I still work where I want and spend my money how I want. I don't beleive we've just lost any freedoms.

      Neither did the German Jews until it was too late. Just ask the legal resident aliens who were detained and/or deported without a hearing or access to legal aid. So long as the Gov't uses the (so-called)Patriot Act to arrest and detain any person they want, and to deny access to counsel, you have lost rights. Just because it doesn't affect you this instant doesn't mean you haven't lost it. FWIW, I personally consider the absolute nonsense one must go thru to board an airplane a loss of personal freedom.

      --
      https://app.box.com/WitthoftResume Code: https://github.com/cellocgw
    3. Re:Makes me sad by isaac · · Score: 1
      And of course, it's is our very freedoms (in many things) that the terrorists want to take away - to make us afraid...

      Just a little niggle there; "the terrorists" want any number of things, but one thing they don't care about at all is "taking away our freedoms."

      They might want to "bomb us, kill our leaders, and convert us to Islam" (to paraphrase our own Ameri-jihadi, Ann Coulter) but our freedoms don't really enter into it.

      -Isaac

      --
      I am not a lawyer, and this is not legal advice. For Entertainment Purposes Only.
  57. looking for the anomolies is hard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What really bothers me about all these "let's build a big database and magically query it to find the terrorists" is a) terrorist events are not normal occurences so it's hard to build query to find them while trying to formulate the inverse query doesn't work (from table=not_normal_triggers is broad enough as to be useless) and b) queries you can construct are the ones that push toward civil liberties violations (from table=religion select muslim).

    You cannot know the unknown. You cannot protect against the unknown unless you want to live in a fall out shelter. Get over it.

    Anybody have any numbers estimating the dollar cost of the people waiting at security check points to get into gov buildings? How does that compare with the damage of 9/11 including say 5m for each death? This is like buying insurance; you only insure what you can't afford to lose. Using TIA to insure safety will cost significantly more socioeconomically than the gains to be had.

  58. Whimsical? by zx75 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    It would let authorities, for instance, instantly find the name and address of every brown-haired owner of a red Ford pickup truck in a 20-mile radius of a suspicious event.

    Matrix is short for Multistate Anti-Terrorism Information Exchange. The name was chosen somewhat whimsically by a Florida law enforcement officer, an agency official said.


    Excuse me? I would have to say that whimsically is not the correct word in this case. Considering the difference in the acronym from MATRIX, I'd have to say that it was chosen Intentionally.

    Alas, it appears that the enforcement officer failed to interperet the meaning behind that name correctly. It was not meant as a message of empowerment to law-enforcement...
    --
    This is not a sig.
  59. TIA kicks ass by seanadams.com · · Score: 2, Funny

    I just use SLIP through my shell account instead of spending another $20 for PPP access!

  60. More reasons to fear RFID. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The tracking abilities inherent in RFID will fall neatly alongside TIA programs. Another piece of a puzzle that is fascism.

  61. For german speakers... by Call+Me+Black+Cloud · · Score: 1

    For German speakers, there is another article about this in Der Spiegel.

    Didn't help...I can speak but not read german, you insensitive clod!

    1. Re:For german speakers... by Little+Brother · · Score: 1

      Das tut mir Leid.

      --

      Little Brother, watching the watchers

  62. Scaring note about the author "asher". by aepervius · · Score: 1

    Looking at the (supposed) past of the guy, and knowing he offered freely its service, I would really search for all kind of backdoor in the source code, If I wear florida official...

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
    1. Re:Scaring note about the author "asher". by Liquorman · · Score: 1
      Of course! Scrutiny of code is a good idea on all sensitive projects.

      However, to single someone out due to a supposedly "shady past" is the type of behavior that opponents of this type of system rightfully fear. Turn the tables. How would you feel if law enforcement search your house due to reports of your "shady past" and other indicators that showed up in "the database" suggesting that you were "potentially criminal"?

      In the USA, people are innocent until proven guilty. This man has not been convicted of these alleged crimes.

  63. Florida by hcetSJ · · Score: 2, Funny
    Judging by the emails my grandparents send every day (from their home in Florida), I feel sorry for anyone working on this project...
    PLayed 9 hoels today with the O"Connors, shto a 52.......LOokign forewrad to seeing teh ROberts in two weeks...........Anne, wea re all glda to hear your news..............
    --

    This side up.
  64. I actually support this by EriktheGreen · · Score: 2, Insightful
    and I'm not kidding.

    Sure, there's some data in federal databases that isn't in private ones, but there's a lot of companies that already have databases like this put together, listing every possible bit of credit and consumer information about you they know or can buy.

    Those databases are unregulated, and they don't have to tell anyone they have assembled that information. Zero accountability. Raise your hand if you think the government doesn't have access to that information on a rental basis.

    Once the government gets this system assembled, there will finally be a concrete reason to work out some legislation governing what can be done with large scale assemblies of data about the public in general, and lawmakers will finally have a reason to draw a line somewhere to mark the point where assembly and correlation of data becomes an invasion of privacy.

    Yeah, it's gonna be painful. But I'd rather have this battle be fought on a battlefield I understand and can control than with guns, knives, and bombs. Just think of how many accounts with access to this database there will be... and how many chances to shoulder surf, social engineer, stack smash, and otherwise access and corrupt the data?

    ObPaRaNoIa: I'm nearly certain that the fed somewhere is harvesting slashdot pages with a web spider and doing a full text index and cross-correlation with other known "hacker" web blogs... it's a great way to keep track of those "criminals". How many hackers can give up reading slashdot, even when they're running from the law?

    Erik

    1. Re:I actually support this by AllUsernamesAreGone · · Score: 1

      "How many hackers can give up reading slashdot, even when they're running from the law?"

      Unless they have a machine somwhere between slashdot's servers and the machine your hypothetical outlaw is using, trawling /. pages will be no use to them. Unless I've missed something /. doesn't display the IP you posted from, let alone your location.

      Of course, getting to a machine between slashdot and the rest of the world would probably be quite doable if my route to the server is typical: several Level3.net and cw.net routers for a start.

      And that's if Echelon doesn't do this stuff already... /me puts on his AFPB.

    2. Re:I actually support this by EriktheGreen · · Score: 1
      Even though your IP doesn't show, lots of other useful information does. Examples: First, a lot of people tend to use the same screen name on a lot of online services. Second, a unique .sig file can mark a person. Third, you can textually analyze a person's typing patterns and HTML code and come up with a percentage chance of a match in authorship between two texts. The list of ways to compare posts is pretty long.

      If you come up with a 90 percent chance that a post on slashdot about hacked government web sites, a post on a hacker board giving details of an intrusion into an un-named government web site, and a post on a college computer club's bbs about web site code naming the student author were written by the same person, that's usually good enough to investigate.

      This is a small part of how echelon works... by matching up fragments of output from a single author/speaker, or fragments of information about them to present a larger picture. The government doesn't need magic back doors to find out what's in your encrypted e-mail... if you make ten comments about the subject in ten different places, they can jigsaw together a pretty good idea of what was occulted by encryption.

      Erik

  65. This being said... by rootX · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As a taxpayer, can I see my information that floats around in these 'public' databases? The information in the M.A.T.R.I.X? Like reviewing my own credit report?

    I suspect not, which then brings up the flip side, how do I protect my privacy and get my information removed from these 'public' databases?

    I am not a criminal, but I feel I have no control over my privacy anymore.

    --
    -- sed s/liberty/profit/g US.Constitution
  66. Agents in real life? by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
    So the agents in real life might say something like:

    "Unforunately no one can be told what the Matrix is.....well....actually, we could tell you, but then we'd have to kill you.......o wait....you're a terrorist, we'll just kill you anyway."

    --
    Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  67. M.A.T.R.I.X by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Welcome to the wonderful world of acronym-driven development.

    Oh, and the "R" is probably from TeRrorism, and (naturally) the X is from eXchange. You pick your letters up where you can find 'em folks -- it's a time-honored tradition.

    Before you get all hot and bothered about that not "really" being an acronym, remember that 'cp' is for 'CoPy', 'ls' is for 'LiSt', 'rm' is for 'ReMove', etc. etc.

  68. When will i learn by TheBeardIsRed · · Score: 1

    Goddamnit, just when i thought I had the right pill picked they changing the whole system on me. I just don't think i'm going to be able to win this.

  69. What we thought was America's wang... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...turns out to be our national microscope.

    Florida still sucks!

  70. What's with the acronyms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    God, what is this, a comic book? Every government agency has to have some stupid acryonym? Or even better, one from a sci-fi film full of sex-symbol actors?

    Well, why not. Here are some other suggestions:

    Antiterrorist Reactive Security Entity (ARSE)

    Compendium Linking Investigations To Open Records or Information Systems (CLITORIS)

    Security Council of Republics Opposed to Terrorist and Uberterrorist Masterplans (SCROTUM)

    Or maybe this is a bad idea...

  71. Name change by ItWasThem · · Score: 5, Insightful

    At least they picked a name that should strike the proper level of fear into joe citizen. When it was TIA no one had a clue, it was almost as good as the PATRIOT Act (who could vote against being a patriot right?). But with a name like MATRIX thanks to the media machine people will naturally associate it with total helpless control and loss of basic rights.

    This program will be quickly dropped, the politicians will say it was all that guys idea *point long finger* and it'll come up again under the name "USA FLUFFY BUNNIES AND PEACE ON EARTH FOR EVERYONE Act"

    Vote no on USA FLUFFY BUNNIES AND PEACE ON EARTH FOR EVERYONE!

    1. Re:Name change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who could say no to fluffy bunnies and peace on earth? Are you some kind of bunny hater... or a warmonger? You must be a terrorist! Seize him!

  72. Arrrrr, Pirates they be! by twitter · · Score: 1
    "ARR MATIE, we be getting the blackmail goods on the serfs, arrr!"

    try:

    "Aye Matey, we'll have our passage through the backdoor, then share the spoils. Florida has shown us the Bunghole. Make ready, arrrrrgh!"

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:Arrrrr, Pirates they be! by jdew · · Score: 1

      try: ARRRRR METIS!

  73. It's the Bush brothers... by Parsa · · Score: 1

    Not reading all of the posts to see if this has been pointed out yet, but George W's brother, Jeb, is the governor of FL.

    Coincidence that a federally funded project that they really want is popping up the the Prez's brothers front yard??

    J

    --
    Abiit, excessit, evasit, erupit.
    1. Re:It's the Bush brothers... by praedor · · Score: 1

      So...watch Poindexter. Perhaps he is going to resign his post and take up the job of running Florida's TIA project, his baby.


      Poindexter and all associated with him (Reagan, Bush Sr., Bush Jr) are ALL adept at violating the law, lying to Congress about it, and shifting blame. No doubt, this is all just their way of getting their illegal and immoral projects through regardless of what the public or Congress wants.

      --
      In Bushworld, they struggle to keep church and state separate in Iraq as they increasingly merge the two in America.
    2. Re:It's the Bush brothers... by Petronius · · Score: 2, Funny

      Maybe they can use idle CPU cycles to recount ballots in the next election too.

      --
      there's no place like ~
  74. Is this open source by SirLanse · · Score: 1

    I would bet that this is NOT open source. Asher has a shady past.
    Could this program, just happen to miss HIS shady past whenever it is used?
    Some of those sources required a court order to look at, now it just requires a horny cop.

  75. Minilove hoodwinked? by twitter · · Score: 1
    Calling this thing MATRIX *DOES* show a particular level of incompetence behind it.

    No, for some reason people think beter of audatious evil than they do of cringing evil. You never know though, the officer who came up with the name might have wanted to send a warning.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  76. My proposed title... by sdjunky · · Score: 4, Insightful

    States Archive of Terrorist Actions Network
    OR
    S.A.T.A.N

    Yeah... that's it

    1. Re:My proposed title... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      States Archive of Terrorist Actions Network
      OR
      S.A.T.A.N


      Then the religious nuts will complain and the States Archive Network of Terrorist Actions will be created instead, or

      S.A.N.T.A.

  77. Opensecrets says.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative


    Guess who is developing this system ?
    Seisint
    guess who is the number 12 campaign contributer to the republicans ? who just got awarded
    1.6million (with more to follow)

    Seisint

    enjoy because its not like anyone will do anything about it, oh except vote them in again

    1. Re:Opensecrets says.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like the Democrats are any better. Corruption and Politics go hand and hand. USA is not even the worst of the lot, far from it.

  78. It's the Cabin boy's fault! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The cabin boy, the cabin boy,
    The dirty little nipper,
    Packed his ass with Broken Glass,
    And Circumcised the Skipper!

    Hic!

  79. Hmm... Mixed opinions... by crazyphilman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    On the one hand, anything that helps law enforcement officers track down and lock up criminal types is a Good Thing, and anything that helps them identify something dangerous in progress is also Good.

    BUT,

    On the other hand, there are a wide range of different kinds of cops, and at least half of them aren't the sort of people who should BE cops. They're like the dickhead who used to cruise around my neighborhood on the fourth of july, "confiscating" everyone's fireworks and bringing them home to his own kids, or the cop who keeps a "drop gun" handy in case he fucks up and shoots the wrong person, or the cops who you hear about from time to time, who shake down hookers and drug dealers for their own piece of the pie (pardon the pun).

    The problem is, cops are people. And, like all people, some are good and some are bad. Some are REALLY bad. Put a tool like this in their hands, without sufficient top-down control (and you know, they're just going to give that lip service) and at least some of the cops entrusted with this will misuse it. Regularly. Perhaps often.

    Another problem is, there's a real "us vs. them" mentality among cops, so even if one cop finds out another cop is, say, digging around in his ex-girlfriend's current boyfriend's records, it's unlikely anything will be done about it. Cops don't "rat" each other out, ok? They just don't. Do you really think a bunch of good old boys are going to keep an eye on each other? What'll really happen is, "Joe won't snitch on Bob for fucking with the guy who 'stole' Bob's girl, if Bob doesn't snitch on Joe for checking up on the hot babe who lives in his building". And, Joe and Bob will keep on misusing their power, as has happened throughout history.

    For that reason, I'm against this utterly.

    --
    Farewell! It's been a fine buncha years!
    1. Re:Hmm... Mixed opinions... by Kjella · · Score: 1

      On the one hand, anything that helps law enforcement officers track down and lock up criminal types is a Good Thing, and anything that helps them identify something dangerous in progress is also Good.

      I'm sure the KGB and Gestapo would love that attitude. Even when you don't directly abuse the system, it still gives you an incredible amount of control. There's a reason why there's a saying "the pen is mightier than the sword". And who controls the pen here? Does it have the proper checks and balances? I doubt it.

      And since I've started to quote sayings, how about "Power corrupts, and total power corrupts totally"? If you've figured out that the core of the last one is that information is power, try combining the two. The result is scary, in my opinion.

      Kjella

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    2. Re:Hmm... Mixed opinions... by crazyphilman · · Score: 1

      Please, go back and read the rest of my post. ;)

      --
      Farewell! It's been a fine buncha years!
  80. trusted access? by luigi6699 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    On the one hand, the use of computers to consolidate information already available to law enforcement is inevitable. It's great that it's happening (relatively) in the open, where some (relatively) accountable people will be setting the regulations. BUT just the fact that this sort of database EXISTS scares the hell outta me. realize that this will be the NUMBER ONE hack target in the world. Detailed information about every citizen and visitor of the United States, from their home address to their shopping habits. terrorists aren't the only ones who will be willing to pay out the *ss for this! And all it takes is ONE bribe-able officer. And we aren't just talking small, hundred thousand dollar bribes, either... many many people would pay in the hundreds of millions of dollars for access to this. And to top it all off, the guy developing it has a suspicious history, and a tendency to volunteer himself for projects involving sensitive government information. But he's trustworthy, right? I hope they have a team of monkeys working around the clock to check for backdoors, 'cause I'D put one in if i was writing this system...

    --
    **** You never REALLY learn to swear until you own a computer. ****
  81. Overreactions by mr_luc · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I know that everyone is scared about the TIA initiative, and we all pretty much agree that it's a bad thing. But please RTFA, and think about this a little bit:

    They are using information that has ALWAYS been available to Law Enforcement. Now, granted, the question we all ask is "How do we know that it will be restricted to use by Law Enforcement?" and "How do we know it won't be abused?", but really, you don't -- and you never did. People always abuse systems, and sometimes they get caught and sometimes they don't, but this particular initiative is not inherently evil.

    It is just technology, and to combat it is Luddite.

    Hell, this system could be enormously beneficial, especially if it lets citizens check what info the system has on them! You know how hard it is to track down black marks and shit on your record right now? The paperwork is insane. This system brings it all together.

    It's just technology. The technology is inevitable. What people should be concerned with is, not trying to cripple or deny funding to these initiatives. They are truly inevitable. Instead, embrace them and try to make sure that the RIGHT laws get passed.

    I think that as long as laws are passed -- ironclad laws -- that specify EXACTLY who can use this system and when, everything will be ok. Really, if it is restricted to traditional Law Enforcement agencies (within the state), I don't see a problem. Now when they start tracking our travel and our purchases, like TIA wanted, I worry. But stuff like what car you drive (DMV), your picture (driver's license, DMV), where you live (anywhere), your criminal history (same ol' same ol') -- none of this is new, and it's not particularly sinister. In fact, it kicks ass.

    1. Re:Overreactions by jazman_777 · · Score: 1
      It is just technology, and to combat it is Luddite.

      Sure. Or is all technology to be embraced without question?

      --
      Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    2. Re:Overreactions by Kaa · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's just technology. The technology is inevitable.

      That's not "just technology". That's a specific application of technology and there's nothing inevitable about it.

      It's quite easy, technologically, to fit everyone in the country with an electronic bracelet (or anklet) which transmits to law enforcement data center that person's location in real time. It might not be so easy to do this politically.

      Or take an even simpler example. Until recently there were no public roads in the USA where it was legal to go faster than, say, 70 mph. Why weren't all cars fitted with governors that would limit the speed to 70 mph? From the technology point of view it's trivial to do...

      --

      Kaa
      Kaa's Law: In any sufficiently large group of people most are idiots.
    3. Re:Overreactions by Efreet · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I agree with you in principle, but I think we need alot more than just laws to make sure that abuse is prevented. After all, its the very poeple charged with enforcing the laws that we are in danger from. What we need is either some sort of watchdog orginization charged specifically with preventing abuses of this power, or (better yet) some sort of mutual transparency that lets *the general public* monitor how the police use this power.

      --
      This sig wasn't worth reading, was it.
    4. Re:Overreactions by EnderWiggnz · · Score: 1

      only labor creates wealth, yet is denied the fruit of its efforts.

      --
      ... hi bingo ...
    5. Re:Overreactions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullshit. If labor wants to enjoy the "fruit of its efforts" it can go start its own company, develop its own processes, and run from there.

      But lets face it... if "labor" wasn't told what to do, they wouldn't be creating anything.

    6. Re:Overreactions by WNight · · Score: 1

      You're right, one database would be easier to police. Queries could be written to let people view only the appropriate information for their job, and with no duplicated data, stopping errors would be easier.

      But do you really think anyone in charge of this wouldn't have a way for law enforcement to easily access all the data?

      If I trusted the government, I'd like this system more than others because it could be secured. If pigs could fly.

    7. Re:Overreactions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      bzzzt... wrong... try again.

      labor is the _only_ thing that creates wealth. it has been true from the beginning of time. natural resources do not mine themselves - you need labor. retail goods do not make themselves, you need labor.

      and if labor decides to work for you, you have what is called a strike, and you will not make any more money.

      labor is by and far the most important input of production.

    8. Re:Overreactions by Anonymous+Coed · · Score: 1
      Labor is certainly an important input of production. But how is it any more or less important than the other inputs:

      raw materials

      capital (infrastructure, equipment, etc)

      entrepreneurship (leadership/direction)

      Production is impossible without all four major inputs. Like the parent poster said, if "labor" feels it is being deprived of its "fruits" then labor needs to start its own company and produce a competitive product.

      This is the inherent failure and contradiction of Marxism. "Labor" by itself alone is no more capabable of generating new wealth than a sack of money buried in the backyard is. Labor itself is a commodity in a market like any other.

    9. Re:Overreactions by DrMorpheus · · Score: 1
      Labor is certainly an important input of production. But how is it any more or less important than the other inputs:

      raw materials

      Which can only be gather through labor.
      capital (infrastructure, equipment, etc)
      Which is only created through labor.
      entrepreneurship (leadership/direction)
      Which is labor, not something magical.

      Human labor is the only means by which wealth is created. Inanimate objects, like raw materials and capital, are literally as incapable of creating wealth as your "sack of money buried in the backyard".

      --
      Debunking the "59 Deceits"
  82. Look Out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This would be a great system if we lived in a perfect world and nobody would be tempted by evil to misuse the system. But then again, in a perfect world there wouldn't be any bad guys to catch either.

    It's not the fact that someone can determine my age, where I live, what color my hair is, my favorite toothpaste, etc that scares me. Anyone who is dedicated enough can find all that info now anyway.

    I fear that the developer in this case may sell off back-door info to the highest bidding criminals. This way hackers or criminals/future criminals wishing to commit a premeditated crime can gain the list of suspects that would be given to law enforcement officers before they even commit the crime. Great way to pick an innocent person to frame.

  83. dept. of homeland surveillence by 514x0r · · Score: 1

    so are these the new dept. of homeland surveillence m$ machines that this will be running on?
    not only are they tracking me, they're making it easy for anyone to break into the tracking system?!?!?!

    --

    !(^((ri)|(mp))aa$)
    1. Re:dept. of homeland surveillence by AllUsernamesAreGone · · Score: 1

      You're complaining? Gives to an easy way to get in and make sure they aren't storing anything about you that you don't want them to....

      (note - this is not a joke, think about it in the context of the fact that the most dangerous criminals are the most intelligent ones...)

    2. Re:dept. of homeland surveillence by mobileskimo · · Score: 1

      Shhhh!

      --
      "Last one in is a rotten goblin!" - Kepp
  84. Off the node by blackchiney · · Score: 2, Funny

    Who's with me to get off the network? I got it all figured out. We live in RVs, pay in cash, and use public libraries. And work as freelance technical support using prepaid cellphones. mmwahh hahahah

    1. Re:Off the node by cellocgw · · Score: 1
      Who's with me to get off the network? I got it all figured out. We live in RVs, pay in cash, and use public libraries. And work as freelance technical support using prepaid cellphones. mmwahh hahahah

      I know you posted in jest, but you forgot that in theory at least, all public libraries are supposed to log all your online access, card catalog research, and items checked out. (and report said logs to the Acronymic Governmental Agendy Dujour.

      --
      https://app.box.com/WitthoftResume Code: https://github.com/cellocgw
    2. Re:Off the node by IWorkForMorons · · Score: 1

      I thought that libraries were taking the stance of destroying those records on a daily basis, to cover their asses and the asses of anyone who checks out Nineteen Eighty-Four, Bomb Making For Fun and Profit, and the Dan Quail Autobiography all at the same time?

    3. Re:Off the node by autechre · · Score: 1

      Don't you need a driver's license to drive the R.V.s?

      I'm sure you can be left quite alone if you become a hermit in the mountains, and while there are certain advantages to that lifestyle, I think I'll pass.

      --
      WMBC freeform/independent online radio.
    4. Re:Off the node by mink · · Score: 1

      "Nineteen Eighty-Four, Bomb Making For Fun and Profit, and the Dan Quail Autobiography"

      So thats the answer to the question posed at the end of the "Time Machine" (the old film not the remake).

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
  85. Im totally aware of your information.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Paul S. Cameron, president of Seisint Inc., the Boca Raton, Fla., company that developed the Matrix system and donated it to the state, said: "It is exactly how law enforcement worked yesterday, except it's extraordinarily faster. In this age of risks that appear immediately, you have to be able to respond immediately."


    Paul S. Cameron: The
    Matrix has YOU!

  86. Two questions (with follow-ups) by geomon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Asher has also donated services to the FBI, the Secret Service and other agencies. And authorities credit Seisint with helping to turn up links among the hijackers who slammed planes into the Pentagon and the World Trade Center, and to some of their associates.

    1) If this statement is indeed true, then my first question is "Were the links apparent before, or after the terrorist attacks".

    a) If the answer is "before", then why didn't these paragons of virtue say something and save ~3000 lives?

    b) If the answer is "after", then the system is worthless as an intelligence tool. The bits and pieces of any conspiracy are always out in the public before an incident occurs. The value of intelligence analysis is the ability to merge these apparently unrelated pieces of information to reach a conclusion. If their system is only capable of making a link after an event, then Florida residents better keep an eye on their wallets.

    Here, I'll do the same thing without their database: 'The Japanese were responsible for
    bombing Pearl Harbor.'

    Pretty neat, huh?

    2) Who goes to jail if the system is used for political surveillance?

    a) Considering the system can be abused (a point that even supporters admit is possible), who will be responsible for rouge elements within a state government that use the system to collect information on political activists who disagree with a sitting administration?

    b) Does anyone really believe that Nixon DIDN'T use the IRS and FBI to spy on anti-war activists during Viet Nam?

    This system, however worthy it is in stopping potential violent acts, is too dangerous a tool to be placed in the hands of politicians.

    --
    "Rocky Rococo, at your cervix!"
    1. Re:Two questions (with follow-ups) by bm_luethke · · Score: 1

      1) If this statement is indeed true, then my first question is "Were the links apparent before, or after the terrorist attacks".

      a) If the answer is "before", then why didn't these paragons of virtue say something and save ~3000 lives?


      Because there were many many different plots that appeared to be going on - flying a plane into the world trade center sounded quite a bit tin-foil hat theory - would you have supported military and police action because "it appeared, within the intelligence commite, that the taliban was going to fly an airplane into the world trade centers"? Probably not.

      b) If the answer is "after", then the system is worthless as an intelligence tool. The bits and pieces of any conspiracy are always out in the public before an incident occurs. The value of intelligence analysis is the ability to merge these apparently unrelated pieces of information to reach a conclusion. If their system is only capable of making a link after an event, then Florida residents better keep an eye on their wallets.

      Not true - it is generall a good idea to figure out who did it with a reasonable amount of certainty for some form of prosecution. I for one like that.

      Here, I'll do the same thing without their database: 'The Japanese were responsible for
      bombing Pearl Harbor.'

      Pretty neat, huh?


      Yes, pretty neat. Especially considering that was a pretty simple trail to follow. Maybe some of the other recent bombings are not so simple?

      There are much better reasons to hate/fear this system than those. They are actually pretty good reasons to have it if the privacy concerns could be met (which they really can not).

      --
      ------- Sorry about the spelling, I suffer from two problems. Dyslexia makes it difficult to spell well, lazy makes it
    2. Re:Two questions (with follow-ups) by geomon · · Score: 1

      >>a) If the answer is "before", then why didn't these paragons of virtue say something and save ~3000 lives?

      Because there were many many different plots that appeared to be going on - flying a plane into the world trade center sounded quite a bit tin-foil hat theory - would you have supported military and police action because "it appeared, within the intelligence commite, that the taliban was going to fly an airplane into the world trade centers"? Probably not.


      Then the system is *still* worthless because the information will not be acted upon in a timely manner. The future attack will occur despite the enhanced surveillance because the conclusions developed from the intelligence may sound insane to the analyst. In short, all conclusions leading to something outrageous will be ignored. So the reasons for gathering the information cannot be justified based on the prospect that it *might* catch the bad guys.

      Despite what you have said about the idea of crashing planes into buildings as a terrorist tool, this scenario was discussed within the intelligence community long before 9-11.

      And as a substitution to Pearl Harbor, I conclude that the Murrah Federal Building was bombed by a single white male who claimed to be saving the American people from a tyrannical government.

      >>b) If the answer is "after", then the system is worthless as an intelligence tool. The bits and pieces of any conspiracy are always out in the public before an incident occurs. The value of intelligence analysis is the ability to merge these apparently unrelated pieces of information to reach a conclusion. If their system is only capable of making a link after an event, then Florida residents better keep an eye on their wallets.

      Not true - it is generall a good idea to figure out who did it with a reasonable amount of certainty for some form of prosecution. I for one like that.


      Right. Just like the FBI started dragging in all Arab males just after the Murrah Building was destroyed. The FBI later claimed they had reasonable certainty that the attackers fit the profile.

      They were wrong and innocent citizens paid the price.

      I like systems that don't violate our collective civil rights.

      --
      "Rocky Rococo, at your cervix!"
    3. Re:Two questions (with follow-ups) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      who will be responsible for rouge elements

      I dunno, maybe the cosmetics department?

    4. Re:Two questions (with follow-ups) by geomon · · Score: 1

      >>who will be responsible for rouge elements

      I dunno, maybe the cosmetics department?


      Which only goes to prove that what separates something pretty from something vulgar is where 'U' are positioned.

      Okay, that one stunk.....

      --
      "Rocky Rococo, at your cervix!"
    5. Re:Two questions (with follow-ups) by Eric+S.+Smith · · Score: 1
      [...]would you have supported military and police action because "it appeared, within the intelligence commite, that the taliban was going to fly an airplane into the world trade centers"? Probably not.

      And rightly so, because it wasn't the Taliban, now, was it?

    6. Re:Two questions (with follow-ups) by bm_luethke · · Score: 1

      Then the system is *still* worthless because the information will not be acted upon in a timely manner. The future attack will occur despite the enhanced surveillance because the conclusions developed from the intelligence may sound insane to the analyst. In short, all conclusions leading to something outrageous will be ignored. So the reasons for gathering the information cannot be justified based on the prospect that it *might* catch the bad guys.

      If you are waiting for an all or nothing perfect system then it will never happen. Most are incremental and a learning process. Even if it only foils many small terrorist attacks and a few large ones it is still a good system with repect to catching terrorists - much better than what we are doing now. Once more that irrespective of personal freedoms - just that arguing that it will not catch all criminals (or even just a few of them) will fall on deaf ears for most people. And if it is enough of a personal violation to be bad then it is regardless of the amount of criminals or terrorist it would catch.

      Right. Just like the FBI started dragging in all Arab males just after the Murrah Building was destroyed. The FBI later claimed they had reasonable certainty that the attackers fit the profile.

      And they did have reason. Profiles are statistical models and as such are not infallable. If over 90% of those crimes are commited by a certain group (be it religious, ethnic, or such) then it is fairly reasonable to seek out those people - the people they gathered up were not just simply random Arabs. Innocent people get detained and interviewed all the time.

      But, then again, thier methods also *did* end up with catching the correct person.

      --
      ------- Sorry about the spelling, I suffer from two problems. Dyslexia makes it difficult to spell well, lazy makes it
  87. You don't have to worry by g0hare · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Cops are always honest and unbribe-able (sp?). Besides the US government has never abused any of its powers.

    And the government needs to know your credit rating. Because if you are poor you are a criminal in America today. If you are poor you might have motivation to commit a crime, rich people don't commit crimes because they're already rich.

    --
    Vote Quimby!
    1. Re:You don't have to worry by sirgoran · · Score: 1

      Right....

      And the Check's in the mail.
      I've never asked anyone to do this before.
      I won't cum in your mouth
      Of course I'll respect you and call you.


      You forgot to turn on your sarcasm light.

      It's a good thing my bullsh*t detector caught it!.

      I figure as long as we have a government that keeps secrets, and hides the truth from us, then I have every right to keep my secrets from them and to keep my personal information private.

      -Goran

      --
      Carpe Scrotum - The only way to deal with your competition.
    2. Re:You don't have to worry by cc_pirate · · Score: 1

      Rich people don't committ crimes because they buy our representatives who define what crimes are.

      America may be the best country in the world, but all that tells me is the world is one FSCKED up place.

      --

      "There are laws that enslave men, and laws that set them free. " - Sean Connery as King Arthur

  88. Backdoor? by Josuah · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Does anyone know if the government agencies have access to the source code, and are using internally compiled and configured versions of the software and hardware? This software has been donated for free to the state of Florida, and it seems as though this guy has also donated software to other government agencies. This would be a great way for someone to get backdoors into some of the most sensitive information systems in the U.S.

  89. This isn't the problem by ad0gg · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The problem is the commercial databases that are for sale. I'm more concerned about getting my info off these databases. I want my privacy, actually I demand my privacy.

    --

    Have you ever been to a turkish prison?

  90. Religious freedom for rich white males (OT) by YU+Nicks+NE+Way · · Score: 1

    No. What you're told is that you can't coerce my children to participate in the practice of your religion -- or, rather, your sect's abuse of religion. Of course, I suppose that I could ask the new Bishop from my branch of the Church to come speak on the tradition of biblical misinterpretation regarding homosexuality to your kids school, if you really want people's religion in the public sphere.

    My freedom from your religion is the same right as your protection from mine. If you won't accept the first, then you don't get the second.

  91. my experience by JimBobJoe · · Score: 5, Informative

    I've done lots of privacy work, especially concerning driver's license privacy.

    About a year and a half ago, a well known local school board member (known for being very troublesome to other school board members, but extremely well respected and liked by the voters in his community) had an article printed about him in the newspaper saying that he had two driver's licenses.

    The question was, how did they find out he had two licenses, since license data is protected by both state and national law. Unless the DMV actually had decided to take action against him (which they had not) someone with access to the database must have called up the paper.

    So I called him up, and he said a few days before the article came out, he and his daughter were pulled over. His daughter was driving, but they were in a rented car, so the officer wanted to see his license, because he rented the car. The officer recognized who he was, talked about their military records, and let them on their way. So the hypothesis was that this officer then scanned through the computer, and found the two licenses, and called up the newspaper--which is where the violation of law occurred.

    (With regard to the two licenses, the person claimed that it was an error on the part of the DMV. The two records had two different SSNs.)

    Anyway, so I did the obvious. Based on freedom of information act, we asked the DMV and the state highway patrol (who runs the computer that the cops use in this state) to give us the data on who accessed the license records and when (a simple record request.)

    The DMV cooperated immediately...and nothing of consequence there...they checked his license(s) records when the local newspaper called, to confirm whether or not he did have two licenses (an act which may have violated DPPA (driver's privacy protection act) but that hasn't been determined yet.)

    The state highway patrol said that they didn't have to give up their records. Well, I checked through everything I could, but I couldn't find a single place which gave them that authority (though they claimed it.) They said they would perform an internal investigation, and give us the results of that investigation, but would redact the information concerning whom actually looked at his license(s) records.

    The story ends there, more or less. The school board member decided that this issue wasn't worth pursuing, given time and resources. And he felt that he already caused enough trouble.

    (Actually the story ends this way...two agents of the DMV came to his house and told him that if he gives up the two licenses, they will just reissue him one license at the DMV and that will be that. I don't need to tell you that this is pretty irregular behavior by the DMV (they didn't even charge him) but even with all the time I spend researching the DMV, I can't figure out why they did it.)

    I guess the point is, the ability to get auditing records of such a database is vital for making sure it's being used correctly. When a state agency refuses to give up auditing records on yourself, it implies that a need for greater oversight on how they operate.

    (My signature talks about my current driver's license privacy project in New Jersey...I wanted yall to know that it didn't happen in NJ, but in Ohio.)

  92. Sort of an improvement by diabolik333 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well, at least a drug-smuggling-pilot-turned-snitch is a somewhat better person to have in charge of all of our personal information than Disgraced Iran-Contra Felon John Poindexter (as El Reg tends to call him... or something similar).

    Anyone who can remember back to the year 2000 knows that the State of Florida can certainly be trusted to handle millions of documents in an appropriate fashion.

  93. Mod parent up.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Insightful post, mod him up, I have allready used my points.

  94. Creating Acronyms for projects by hpulley · · Score: 1

    I've worked in companies and so have colleages which have had some military contracts and in my experience with army, navy, air force, et al, the project leaders don't feel good about starting ANYthing until they have a cool acronym for it. No lie, until the acronym is set, no other work is done. The acronym is job #1 for the military planners.

    --
    $#!^ happens, but why does it always have to happen to me???
    1. Re:Creating Acronyms for projects by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was in the military and he is 100% correct.

    2. Re:Creating Acronyms for projects by WTFmonkey · · Score: 1

      Not even cool ones. What the hell is with CINCPACNORCOMFLEETPACWEST and things like that (okay, I made that one up)? Why is BUPERS better than BP?

  95. Wise words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone ever heard the song "Regaining Unconsciousness" by NOFX?

    First they put away the dealers
    Keep our kids safe and off the streets
    Then they put away the prostitutes
    Keep married men cloistered at home
    Then they shooed away the bums
    and they beat and bashed the queers
    Turned away asylum seekers
    Fed us suspicions and fears
    (We didn't raise our voice)
    We didn't make a fuss
    It's funny there was no one left to notice
    When they came for us

    Looks like witches are in season
    You better fly your flag and be aware
    Of anyone who might fit the descripiton
    Diversity is now our biggest fear
    Now with our conversations tapped
    and our differences exposed
    How are you supposed to love your neighbor
    With our minds and curtains closed
    We had to worry about big brother
    Now we gotta big father and an even bigger mother

    and you still believe this aristocracy gives a fuck about you
    They put the mock in Demockracy and you swallowed every hook
    The sad truth is you'd rather follow the school into the net
    Cuz swimming in the sea is not the kinda freedom that you actually want
    So go back to your crib and suck on a tit
    Go back the warmth of your diaper, you're sitting in shit
    and piss while sucking on a giant pacifier

    A country of adult infants
    A legion of mental midgets
    A country of adult infants
    A country of adult infants
    All regaining their unconsciousness

  96. Armani by Concerned+Onlooker · · Score: 1

    The same way you get Armani Exchange out of A|X

    --
    http://www.rootstrikers.org/
  97. Ahoy M.A.T.I.E. by nhavar · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Ass pirates off the starboard bow, ARRRRR!"

    --
    "Do not be swept up in the momentum of mediocrity." - anon
  98. Accuracy of the MATRIX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If this database is as reliable as the one used to purge the voter list in Florida (before the last Presidential election) then most of the people in the country will be "known terrorists".

  99. Face it, It's Over by jazman_777 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Liberty is dead. Americans want ZERO risk. Such a people are destined for slavery under an Iron Fist.

    --
    Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    1. Re:Face it, It's Over by whathappenedtomonday · · Score: 0
      and not much doubt about the road ahead.

      Fascism is commonly defined as an open terror-based dictatorship which is:

      Reactionary: makes policy based upon current circumstances rather than creating policies to prevent problems; piles lies and misnomers on top of more lies until the truth becomes indistinguishable, revised or forgotten.

      Chauvinistic: Two or more tiered legal systems, varying rights based upon superficial characteristics such as race, creed and origin.

      Imperialist elements of finance capital: Extending a nation's authority by territorial acquisition or by the establishment of economic and political domination of one state over its allies.

      Though a dictatorship is the most common association with fascism, a democracy or republic can also be fascist when it strays away from its tenants of sovereignty.

      taken from the link in my sig.

      --
      I hope I didn't brain my damage.
  100. Incompetent workers by clutchperformer · · Score: 3, Insightful

    My state's IT people are too incompetent and/or mismanaged to get a single decent IT project completed. I'd say 90% of IT and software design is a total waste in state gov't.

    Even if they could get their act together, the house and senate can't sustain funding for them even when there's plenty of money, much less when they are Billions in the red.

    Using outside firms, known for cashing in on lucrative cushy government contracts while producing virtually nothing, only compounds the problem.

    What makes you think they can make this work?

    What will result is a system that will track law abiding people while clever "grifters" and "criminals" short circuit the system, or worse, use the system as a means to further their agenda.

    When an incompetent but well-intentioned government spies on their own, they end up exposing to danger the very people they are sworn to protect.

    In the U.S., not much talent gravitates to the government sector when fortunes can be made elsewhere.

  101. "TIA" was honest also. by mcc · · Score: 1

    "Tia" is spanish for "Aunt".

    You know, as in the overbearing, meddling aunt who's always gossiping and trying to interfere in your life?

  102. This doesnt sounds right by windchill2001 · · Score: 1

    Does anyone remember back a few weeks to this post? Basically by collecting a whole lot of public available information, This guys guy created a great tool. The MATRIX is such a tool, only instead of mapping out Fiberoptic cables, It maps out every details about every ones private lives.

    The point i am trying to make is that when the data is scatterd between various sources, It is much more difficult for that data to be abused. As this guys masters thesis could be used by terrorists to attack our national infrastructure, the MATRIX could easily be abused to harm each an individual.

    --
    -Windchill2001 The One, The Only, The Cold...
  103. Welcome to the Fourth Reich. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hail America, the new police state :-(

  104. at least they will be prepared. by dpilot · · Score: 1

    Time to buy the tinfoil with CASH, and don't use the store discount card. That way they won't know that their mind-control projectors in the van by the street will be totally ineffective. They will be completely unprepared for my overmodulated frobazz directional emitter.

    --
    The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
  105. Possible sources by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
    Just a quick list of possible sources for data:
    1. DMV
    2. Credit Agencies
    3. Phone Bill
    4. Library Records (My university actually has an online lookup of what you have checkedout in the past....)
    5. Why not feed data to it from Carnivore or Echelon

    Also I rememebr that nowadays most new cellphones keep precise track of the users location! So if the system were tottally abused, they could Have picture of you, Everyone you have ever spoken with, everything you have read, and even your current location.

    Scary...
  106. And this is from the same country of... by Incoherent07 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Benjamin Franklin, who wrote that "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."

    I don't know about you, but I don't feel any safer than I did on September 10, 2001, or September 12, or whatever day you choose to pick. And yet Ashcroft seems intent on tearing down the Constitution piece by piece.

    --
    This is my sig. There are many others like it, but this one is mine.
  107. Scapegoat creator by lawpoop · · Score: 2, Insightful
    As I read in a previous Slashdot posting, all this system will do is make it very easy to create a scapegoat.

    As we all know, eyewitnesses are *terrible* at reporting facts. (Google it if you don't believe me).

    So, if you're looking for an Arab male, 20-30, in the LA area, driving a red pick-up truck, this database will turn up 20 matches. Found your guy, right?

    Wrong. While you're rounding up innocents for heat-lamp questioning, the 25-year-old Phillipino has ditched the stolen truck and is hightailing it to another state.

    --
    Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
    -- Pablo Picasso
  108. Dragnet. by underwhelm · · Score: 1

    How about People Against Normalcy and Goodness?

    --

    I don't need large brains to have a good time.

  109. No. This is actually a tactic. by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Calling this thing MATRIX *DOES* show a particular level of incompetence behind it.


    No it doesn't, I'm afraid. I wish it did, but this is in fact quite deliberate.

    By seeing something as overt as this but letting it go, the public is subconsciously, (and not even very subconsciously at that), chosing to accept subserviance. The level of overt control is raised slowly, and the public lets it go at each level, until they have attained a completly defeated slave mentality.

    The aim of the current war being waged by government against Americans is not to overtly defeat the populace. It's to lead the populace into a state of self-defeat.

    That's how it works. --If they push too far with one attack, (Like this MATRIX shit), and the people start getting rowdy, then they'll immediately pull back and say, "Sorry, Sorry. Didn't mean it, we won't do it. --Well, except for maybe these little parts here and here." And then they'll try again in two weeks with something else. You cannot get them to stop, and you will not be able to find a rational agreement through legislation, because the enemy is not seeking balance; it is seeking total domination and it will not stop pushing and pecking until it has achieved its ends. The public, though dull-witted, is for the most part 'good and reasonable' which means that it will continue to act in good faith. Psychopaths, like Bush are not human and so they will never act in good faith. It's like a diode. The current goes in one direction only. You don't play cards with psychos.

    There are exactly three responses one can take to this kind of tactic:


    1. Haul the heads of government out of their offices and hang them all for high treason.

    2. Get out of the U.S. before they haul you out of *your* office and send you to a camp. (Here's another with site with some photos, --one including a shot of a placard with a date stamp, reading "Jun 00", presumably indicating a construction date shortly after Shrub's election. This particular set of photos is of an un-manned camp, hence the ability to take photos).

    3. Sit on your ass and try to pretend that everything will work out okay until it's too late. See, "Why I did not leave Nazi Germany in Time".

    So of those three. . , which are you going to do?


    -FL

  110. MATRIX? Uh Oh... by Vampyre_Dark · · Score: 1


    Colin Powell: "Looks like we are so totally fucking over the american public with another awesome backdoor program."

    George Bush: "Backdoor program? What is our excuse this time?"

    Colin Powell: "Osama Bin Ladin."

    George Bush: "Whoaaaa terrorism! Heheh But what are we really spending the money on."

    Colin Powell: "A little of this, a little of that, some for Area 51, but mostly drugs and porno."

    Both: "Excellent!"

    *Both high five and play guitar*

  111. Progam was written by a drug smuggler... by qtp · · Score: 1

    Why does that not surprise me.

    This crap has got to stop.

    --
    Read, L
  112. The logo won't be as spooky by ianscot · · Score: 3, Insightful
    What utter PR hacks these people are. First TIA, complete with its bizarre, pyramid beams-are-probing-you departmental logo.

    Having had their hands slapped on that one, they instead resort to the lovely "Matrix" acronym -- perhaps (you think?) thinking that it'd be catchy with all those kids who saw the movie... Note to spooks: to the kids who saw the movie, this acronym will not seem cool, it'll just seem unbelievably scary. Criminy.

    Best stick to "Patriot" something-or-other. That's always good. Red white and blue for the logo this time... With the people in the image depicted in nifty flight suits. Ah, soothes the worry.

    --
    "Fundamentalism" isn't about divine morality. It's about human authority.
  113. still... by Dumbush · · Score: 1

    the MATRIX has us
    run for the exit(Canada)!

  114. Car thieves? by teknokracy · · Score: 1

    This reminds me of local police, a tv/radio campaign. "Lock away your valuables so thieves dont take them." Granted, one is stupid for leaving a CD player etc in plain view in their car, however we should not have to suffer just because people steal things from cars - the police should be taking care of the thieves, not the victims. Then again, I'm sure they're out busy catching people for speeding down a hill at only 10k over the limit (or miles or whatever unit other people use!)

  115. Written in Clarion? And who is Hank Asher? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Hank Asher has been associated with any number of database and data collection agencies(Choicepoint, Accurint, Database Technologies, eData, etc.) and recently with Clarion for Windows(Asher is a speaker)

    The MATRIX is likely written in Clarion for Windows, which would be a real joke on Oracle.

    But why does a suspected drug dealer consistently show up in upper management of firms that mine personal data and why does law enforcement work with him?

    1. Re:Written in Clarion? And who is Hank Asher? by Frailty · · Score: 1

      Why? You obviously haven't read the Standard Operating Procedures for Federal Law Enforcement Agencies.

      --
      " My next house will have no kitchen - just vending machines and a large trash can. "
  116. System Problems by chrystoph · · Score: 1

    The problem with the system proposed is that it no longer relies on the the probability of committing a crime. It now relies on the fact that you fit a set of criteria typed into the search engine. Like so:

    1. Blonde hair
    2. Blue eyes
    3. Jeep Grand Cherokee
    4. Lives in [insert relevent locality]

    Now, instead of looking for a potential criminal by back tracking, we are now looking for everyone that fits that the search criteria.

    "Good evening, Chrystoph. Where were you...."

    I see this as a great way to a) spend more money investigating innocent people b) generate more false positives c)waste more citizens' private funds protecting themselves from wrongful incriminatation.

    If you wanted to control the application, the way to do it is through a central data center that records all transactions and is subject to audit and review as part of the legal process.

    --

    -------------------------
    As easy as herding cats!
  117. Inability vs. Insufficient by Lead+Butthead · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why is it that "they" are always trying to collect more information when it is evident that the problem isn't insufficient information, but INABILITY to process collected information?

    --
    ELOI, ELOI, LAMA SABACHTHANI!?
    1. Re:Inability vs. Insufficient by whathappenedtomonday · · Score: 0
      simple explanation: they have other aims than the obvious, stated ones.

      longer version (from the link in my sig):

      14 defining characteristics common to fascist regimes

      1. Powerful and Continuing Nationalism - Fascist regimes tend to make constant use of patriotic mottos, slogans, symbols, songs, and other paraphernalia. Flags are seen everywhere, as are flag symbols on clothing and in public displays.

      2. Disdain for the Recognition of Human Rights - Because of fear of enemies and the need for security, the people in fascist regimes are persuaded that human rights can be ignored in certain cases because of "need." The people tend to look the other way or even approve of torture, summary executions, assassinations, long incarcerations of prisoners, etc.

      3. Identification of Enemies/Scapegoats as a Unifying Cause - The people are rallied into a unifying patriotic frenzy over the need to eliminate a perceived common threat or foe: racial , ethnic or religious minorities; liberals; communists; socialists, terrorists, etc.

      4. Supremacy of the Military - Even when there are widespread domestic problems, the military is given a disproportionate amount of government funding, and the domestic agenda is neglected. Soldiers and military service are glamorized.

      5. Rampant Sexism - The governments of fascist nations tend to be almost exclusively male-dominated. Under fascist regimes, traditional gender roles are made more rigid. Divorce, abortion and homo-sexuality are suppressed and the state is represented as the ultimate guardian of the family institution.

      6. Controlled Mass Media - Sometimes to media is directly controlled by the government, but in other cases, the media is indirectly controlled by government regulation, or sympathetic media spokespeople and executives. Censorship, especially in war time, is very common.

      7. Obsession with National Security - Fear is used as a motivational tool by the government over the masses.

      8. Religion and Government are Intertwined - Governments in fascist nations tend to use the most common religion in the nation as a tool to manipulate public opinion. Religious rhetoric and terminology is common from government leaders, even when the major tenets of the religion are diametrically opposed to the government's policies or actions.

      9. Corporate Power is Protected - The industrial and business aristocracy of a fascist nation often are the ones who put the government leaders into power, creating a mutually beneficial business/government relationship and power elite.

      10. Labor Power is Suppressed - Because the organizing power of labor is the only real threat to a fascist government, labor unions are either eliminated entirely, or are severely suppressed.

      11. Disdain for Intellectuals and the Arts - Fascist nations tend to promote and tolerate open hostility to higher education, and academia. It is not uncommon for professors and other academics to be censored or even arrested. Free expression in the arts and letters is openly attacked.

      12. Obsession with Crime and Punishment - Under fascist regimes, the police are given almost limitless power to enforce laws. The people are often willing to overlook police abuses and even forego civil liberties in the name of patriotism. There is often a national police force with virtually unlimited power in fascist nations.

      13. Rampant Cronyism and Corruption - Fascist regimes almost always are governed by groups of friends and associates who appoint each other to government positions and use governmental power and authority to protect their friends from accountability. It is not uncommon in fascist regimes for national resources and even treasures to be appropriated or even outright stolen by government leaders.

      14. Fraudulent Elections - Sometimes elections in fascist nations are a complete sham. Other times elections are manipulated by smear campaigns against or even assassination of opposition candidates, use of legislation to control voting numbers or political district boundaries, and manipulation of the media. Fascist nations also typically use their judiciaries to manipulate or control elections

      count your matches ;)

      --
      I hope I didn't brain my damage.
  118. Where are Crockett and Tubbs when we need them? by jmorse · · Score: 1

    Funny...in Florida they don't want felons (or anyone with a name similar to a felon) to vote, but felons sure as hell can "donate" a Big Brother system to the state. Maybe Asher can help with the state's "felon purge" list too.

    --

    "You done taken a wrong turn."
    -Bill McKinney, in Deliverance
    1. Re:Where are Crockett and Tubbs when we need them? by Catbeller · · Score: 1

      Hell, Admiral Poindexter, fall guy for the shadow government run by the neocons under Reagan, and creator of the Total Information Awareness project, would be a felon had he not been rescued by his boss from certain conviction.

      But try to be black in Florida, and have a similar name to a black felon in Texas. Show up on election day, November 7, 2000. Prove you are not a felon to the nice official with a List of Felons that You Sort of Sound Like.

      Rich connected felon gets to create a police state apparatus with the symbol of a floating all-powerful Freemasonic eye over a pyramid radiating Knowledge Rays over a helpless world.

      Innocent schmuck in Florida, who was dangerously close to help elect a Democratic president: DE-nied.

    2. Re:Where are Crockett and Tubbs when we need them? by cheezedawg · · Score: 2, Informative

      Innocent schmuck in Florida, who was dangerously close to help elect a Democratic president: DE-nied.

      When the Federal Election Commission met to investigate the Florida election, they couldn't find a single person that was actually prevented from voting because they were erroneously identified as a felon (Source).

      On the other hand, when the Miami Herald researched the issue, they concluded that the biggest problem with the felon list was that it allowed too many ineligible felons to vote (about 6,500 ineligible felons ended up voting in the election).

      --
      "The defense of freedom requires the advance of freedom" - George W Bush
  119. Wrong movie! by BuddhaDude · · Score: 1

    They tried to be cool by cashing in on the whole Matrix thing, but their acronym is really M.A.T.I.E, which fits in better with Pirates of the Caribbean.

    Aaaarrrrr....

  120. M.A.T.R.I.X. by Master+Controll+Prog · · Score: 3, Interesting

    M.A.T.R.I.X. ('Multistate Anti-Terrorism Information Exchange'). where is the fucking R?

    1. Re:M.A.T.R.I.X. by Skord · · Score: 1

      I'm assuming it's Multistate Anti-Terrorism InfoRmation eXchange, but you know what happens when you assume.

    2. Re:M.A.T.R.I.X. by ducleotide · · Score: 1
      Correction, I believe it is:
      Multistate Anti-TeRrorism Information eXchange

      you had M.A.T.I.R.X but who cares anyway... the M.A.T.R.I.X. has you. how lame is that??

    3. Re:M.A.T.R.I.X. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First that ugly car, and now this. What else will be associated with the movie. I know, matching tighty-whities!

    4. Re:M.A.T.R.I.X. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Roulette. It ties in with the terrorism gambling den the DOD were setting up.

  121. I'll oppose it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    when you teach me kung fu

  122. Let's put this in perspective by bmetz · · Score: 1

    I attended a presentation the chief of police for Delray Beach, FL gave. He showed everyone a traffic ticket for a stopped man in August of 2001. The man was one of the 9/11 hijackers. He was wanted by the next door county about 6 miles away and his record in that county's system had him marked as dangerous.

    The officer that worked for Delray Beach put his driver's license in and saw everything as all clear. He gave the guy a citation and he drove off. The two counties' systems weren't linked, so he didn't know better.

    Now things are better; there's a federal system they're linked to, etc. But problems like this, where you hear it and you say 'how could that happen? What do you mean they're not linked?' in hindsight can point how we take for granted our government's ability to put 2 and 2 together.

    People don't want to admit it but we truly need a national ID whose authenticity can be verified in a better manner than 'yeah you look like the picture here' and we need a centralized repository through which every single criminal act passed through. The government isn't some huge evil organization, it's a gigantic group of mediocre employees who are just doing the best they can. If we don't give them the tools to do their jobs we're putting our safety in the hands of beaurocracy.

    --
    What did you eat today? http://www.atetoday.com/
  123. Sweet! by TheFlu · · Score: 1

    This is great news, Florida's got some pretty good T&A.

  124. The answer to the unasked question by JonTurner · · Score: 2, Insightful

    >>Seems to me that such a system really works best on people with nothing to hide - which contradicts the very purpose for which it is intended.

    Agreed. However, the system fulfills it's purpose well -- it does precisely what it was designed to do. Those objectives are simply different from the stated goals. "Law enforcement" learned (from TIA) not to tell the public the real purpose of privacy-invading projects such as this unless they wished to suffer the wrath of elected officials threatened with voter backlash.

  125. does the work of 10000 other systems? by asscroft · · Score: 1

    How is this thing so powerful? Can somoene explain this to me?

    --
    because I have been enjoined by this Holy Office to abandon the false opinion which maintains that the Sun is the centre
  126. "Leaky" credit databases by peter303 · · Score: 1

    Today's print Wall Street Journal (no free web version) mentions how one's medical history "leaks" into a credit report. If you havent paid a medical institution in full, on time, then your payment history goes on your report. The size of the payment and the recipient can indicate if you have something cancer or AIDS, etc. Plus, there have been cases where medical info has been entered directly into the credit report by a creditor. But claims some credit agencies try to eliminate these. (Like yeah).
    So some life insurance companies will now obtain your credit history to look for these clues. The WSJ article mentions a 1993 court case over a mortgage company denying a mortgage over medical info on a credit report. The complaintant had a life threatening condition.
    With credit cards, mortgages, auto insurance, life insurance, medical insurance, car rental agencies, and airlines and the government now looking at these databases, it can make me a bit paranoid.

  127. Constitutionality by Tjp($)pjT · · Score: 1

    I assume that FL and any other states reaching an agreement on this datbase sharing have reached an accord that is blessed by Congress, et al as required in the Constitution? Agreements and treaties between states require Federal approval. If they wanted to, Commerce could probably stop out-of-FL-state data providers from providing data to the state government. Should be interesting.

    --
    - Tjp

    I am in wallow with my inner money grubbing capitalistic pig. ... Oink!

  128. I smell a Lawsuit... by Cyno01 · · Score: 1

    Hopefully either the brothers Wachowski or Warner will jump on this and put a stop to it before it can get off the ground.

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
  129. janitor denied clearance due to credit by peter303 · · Score: 1

    US Today says a Lockheed janitor was denied a security clearance to clean a sensitive factory area, solely because of a bad credit history. He didnt pay all of his medical bills.

  130. mixed emotions... by DigitalEntropy · · Score: 1

    On the comment of M.A.T.R.I.X. being produced by a drug smuggler: who else would know the holes in the system better? This is how countless of my hacker friends have become System Admins or Security Experts for large and small organizations alike. Why? Because they have experience with it. I'm sure you'd sh!t bricks if you found out that your email is hosted on a server administered by none other than someone who used to *read* your emails for fun! But now that he's gainfully employed, he either has less time to hack, or doesn't do it any more.
    I am for unified information. However, I'm not enthusiastic about the kind of information that is being unified.
    The core issue with this kind of technology and the designers behind it, is who forgives. Who can forgive you of a five-finger discount in Maryland if it prevents you from obtaining a job in Washington -- strictly because it was on your criminal history? If the answer is "nobody", then it's back to the five-finger discounts to feed yourself.

    --

    Thank you for reading One Man's Opinion. No participation necessary. Offer void where deemed by law or PATRIOT Act.
  131. Re:The BSA got what it invited by ianscot · · Score: 1

    The constitutional issue wasn't as clear as you're imagining. We're talking about Dale vs. the BSA? That case got to the Supreme Court. It was a 5-4 ruling there, too, split down the usual schism on the court. They overturned a New Jersey ruling that had gone the other way. How "clearly" constitutional was that? Closer than "clearly," surely.

    As for the attempted "destruction" of the BSA, the BSA put me and a lot of other decent people in a real hot seat, and they got what they let themselves in for. If they didn't want to take heat from me, they could avoid humiliating my kids' friends and their parents in order to appease big, conservative funding sources like the Mormon church. How should I explain to two little "tiger scouts" that their parents aren't allowed to be leaders because, while they're much more willing (and able) than the alternatives, they're morally wrong because of the sorts of people they are? These are churchgoing people, in a big way. Next to the ACLU in that case, the BSA were rank yellow cowards. They had a threat to their funding and they wet themselves over it. "Morally straight" organizations have more backbone than that, in my book.

    I prefer a little more control since the ACLU is so broad.

    Okay, I'll accept that -- but as I said, it's a tough thing: the ACLU is by definition going to be backing points of view that are far afield from anything popular, right? And sometimes it's going to be protecting those against "common sense" positions that are much more popular. If you "target" donations you run the risk of slanting the organization's activity toward much softer cases. I'll accept the risk you're worried about.

    --
    "Fundamentalism" isn't about divine morality. It's about human authority.
  132. umm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yeah... try swapping the goodness and the normalcy there chum...

  133. Re:I want cameras on every street and ID cards by mangu · · Score: 1
    IMHO law enforcement should be more effective and should not work by gathering information about everyone and then doing some data mining.


    How, exactly, could law enforcement be made more effective without gathering information and doing data-mining? The only way I can think of is, potentially, even more dangerous: having more police officers with more power. Information gathering isn't dangerous per se, it's the wrong use of that information that's dangerous. My proposal is, let the security agencies gather all the information they need, but also give more freedom to the press. Remember Watergate, even the most powerful man in the world cannot escape from the long arm of a free press.

  134. What software will they use? by ratfynk · · Score: 1

    Knowing the Florida bush country, they will use Microsoft sql software. This will end all their problems with security, any kid in his basement will be able to get at it.

    --
    OH THE SHAME I fell off the wagon and use sigs again!
  135. Good Call by mobileskimo · · Score: 1

    Which is why the CofP for Delray Beach is giving a presentation for it. The same explanation that you give for mediocre employees applies to the CofP. Put yourself in his shoes when the Feds knock on the door and ask "was this citation written by one of your guys?". Doesn't take a lot of imagination or rocket science to get to where he got, in front of an audience pushing for a fed system.

    Driver's licenses are issued by state. I would expect any officer in that state to have access to this information. This has nothing to do with nat identification. I can understand wankers moving states may be difficult to track down. It's why we have special agents of the nat to handle this.

    If the pole ice in Florida had their shit in order within state, regardless of nat identity, the offender would've had a hard time when he was pulled over. This is where he screwed up.

    Apply the right tool for the right purpose and the right context. A NatID might be useful for programs that are provided by nat.

    If a little leg work and some phonecalls are necessary to put together recs from state and fed, then so be it. It's what we pay these guys for.

    Linking them all together makes it too easy a tool to be abused for other purposes. The whole point is that the reason you go after someone's information arises from a particular case or issue. Just like this man who has a record. Not, "since we have a tool now that can put these correlations together lets throw a net out there and see what we catch.". You'll end up with alot of dolphins in your net. This is what most people are fearing. If I had a system like this you bet I'll be running queries.

    I haven't even gotten into the fact that the nat system they plan to create will incorporate information from unofficial and commercial sources. How would you like your local pole ice to pull you over to check if you've been dwi? It says so on my terminal that you buy a lot of alcohol. Is that your child in your vehicle? Your subscription to Pl@yboy has run out. Are you sure you don't have any weapons on you? Guns and ammo website appears to have your creditcard on file.

    The gubment isn't some huge evil organization, it's just a huge organization. There are some people in it that may act evil. it's a gigantic group of mediocre employees who are just doing the best they can, to cover their asses and climb the ladder, just like corporate. The difference between gubment and corporate is gubment has authority and enforcement and jails and guns.

    --
    "Last one in is a rotten goblin!" - Kepp
  136. and this is everywhere by Heisenbug · · Score: 1

    This is my uninformed opinion, so someone tell me if I'm wrong, but it's for that reason that the Matrix seems a little scarier than the TIA program. TIA, I thought, was at least controlled by the FBI. I opposed it for slippery slope reasons, but I figured it would pretty much be used for its intended purpose.

    This, on the other hand, would be in the hands of every local police station. That's way more access points, in the control of much less qualified officials. I don't know how accurate the parent post's stereotypes are -- I suspect that most cops are basically just trying to do their job -- but I would certainly not trust the Matrix in the hands of my local police force.

    Let's all say that again, by the way. We're all gonna be in a database called the Matrix. Who has you? That's right -- the Matrix has you! Yay!

    Oooh, they screwed up this time. Bring on the PR ...

    1. Re:and this is everywhere by crazyphilman · · Score: 1

      I wasn't trying to stereotype cops... I was trying to point out that at least some, perhaps a significant number, do abuse their positions. And, they do cover each other's butts. In NYC, they used to have a name for it (it slips my mind right now) and the basic idea was, cops who rat out other cops commit career suicide -- they can forget about promotions and such (and possibly find themselves a pariah among all the other cops, who they depend on for their lives when the shit hits the fan).

      That's what I'm saying. Stereotype? Or commonly-known characteristic? What cop is going to snitch on another cop? Gimme a break.

      --
      Farewell! It's been a fine buncha years!
  137. Slashdot World Events Futures Quotes +1, Patiotic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the Pentagon won't offer a market, I will:

    Cheney seeks asylum in France by Nov. 2004 120.00 +2.30

    Blair hosts Do You Want To Be A Millionaire by Jan. 2004 98.65 -3.05

    G. W. Bush indicted for tax fraud by Oct. 2003 111.45 +0.34

    Saddam Hussein disovered in Cheney's bunker by Sept. 2004 99.00 +0.89

    Cheney seeks asymlum in Afghanistan by Sept. 2004 101.23 -0.67

    Rumsfeld plays Dr. Strangelove in Dr. Strangelove II 100.00 -0.93

  138. Let's think about this for a second by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Florida, what does Bush's war on terror have to do with Florida....thinking...? Oh yes. That is where his brother is governor. And that is the state that fucked it all up for the rest of us. Thanks Florida and the supremely lame court. Hopefully this matrix thing is a one-off example from a me-too state.

  139. On the node by mobileskimo · · Score: 1

    Don't you need a driver's license to drive the R.V.s?

    Who said drive? He said live.

    I'm sure you can be left quite alone if you become a hermit in the mountains, and while there are certain advantages to that lifestyle, I think I'll pass

    I'm sure you can be left quite alone if you become a citizen of another country. While there are certain advantges to each, I suggest you find out all of them.

    --
    "Last one in is a rotten goblin!" - Kepp
  140. From Hell -- A Memo from Florida by Hard+Rain+Coming · · Score: 2, Funny



    ***** TOP SECRET *** LEVEL OMEGA *****

    ****** DESTROY BEFORE READING ******
    .
    .
    --- ROUTED VIA: USA/UK Echelon Network ---
    .
    .
    FROM: Jeb Bush, Satrap of Florida

    TO: George Bush II, Emperor of Amerika and Scourge of Liberty

    CC: Carl "Grima Wormtongue" Rove; "Tricky Dickie" Cheney; Donald "Shrug" Rumsfeld; John "Hang 'Em High" Ashcroft; Tom "Gestapo" Ridge; Condoleezza "I Didn't Say That!" Rice

    BCC: The Eye of Sauron; Lux Ferre, First of The Fallen; The Illuminated Seers of Bavaria; Baba Yaga; the Fenris-Wolf Who Shalt Devour the Sun; He-Who-Must-Not-Be-Named c/o Slytherin House; the Hungry Shades of Stalin, Hitler, Mao and Pol Pot.

    RE: T.I.A. (HomeSec Censor: Please, "Terrorist"! We've warned you before, Sir!) Information Awareness Project
    .
    .

    Bro,

    How's it hanging? (So, can I borrow your padded flight suit and the U.S.S. Ronald Reagan next month or not? I got a thing scheduled...)

    Now that you've got the nation focused on the federal-level T.I.A. and PATRIOT Act hearings and our good buddy Poindexter is doing the fall guy thing for P.A.M. (not to mention our highly publicised "spat" over Cuban returnees having lowered everyone's sights from me. Brilliant! Thank Rove again for coming up with *that* one. Heheheh.), I'm going ahead with Phase One our real plan of slipping in Operation Eye in the Pyramid state-by-state under the media and federal oversee committee radar.

    Full details to follow later: Got me a press feeding to conduct in a few minutes.

    You'll love the code name for this one: M.A.T.R.I.X. !!! Boy-o-boy, *that's* almost as good a name as the FBI's CARNIVORE Phone/Net intercept operation (yeah, yeah -- I heard some bleeding-heart convinced some wuss in the J. Edgar. Hoover Building downtown to change it to "DCS1000". As if the average Joe even cares to look behind *any* curtain in Oz...)

    Love to Pops. Don't forget to up his drugs again : I'm a bit worried after that last "no comment" thing in response to media queries to his opinion of you a few months ago...

    Novus Ordo Seclorum! (Or as you like to say, "Bring It On!")

    Affectionately,
    Jeb

  141. Re:what the future holds by whathappenedtomonday · · Score: 0
    read the link in my sig and see how much you recognize; some key points from that article:

    The 7 conditions (Warning signs)
    that foster & fuel fascism are:

    Instability of capitalist relationships or markets

    The existence of considerable declassed social elements

    The stripping of rights and wealth focused upon a specific segment of the population, specifically the middle class and intellectuals within urban areas as this the group with the means, intelligence and ability to stop fascism if given the opportunity.

    Discontent among the rural lower middle class (clerks, secretaries, white collar labor).

    Consistent discontent among the general middle and lower middle classes against the oppressing upper-classes (haves vs have-nots).

    Hate: Pronounced, perpetuated and accepted public disdain of a specific group defined by race, origin, theology or association.

    Greed: The motivator of fascism, which is generally associated with land, space or scarce resources in the possession of those being oppressed.

    Organized Propaganda:

    a) The creation of social mythology that venerates (creates saints of) one element of society while concurrently vilifying (dehumanizing) another element of the population through misinformation, misdirection and the obscuring of factual matter through removal, destruction or social humiliation, (name-calling, false accusations, belittling and threats).

    b) The squelching of public debate not agreeing with the popular agenda via slander, libel, threats, theft, destruction, historical revisionism and social humiliation. Journalists in particular are terrorized if they attempt to publish stories contrary to the agenda.

    --
    I hope I didn't brain my damage.
  142. How comforting by Hamster+Lover · · Score: 1

    "A senior official overseeing the project acknowledged it could be intrusive and pledged to use it with restraint"

    Perhaps this will be the great defense to the subjugation of our liberties: "But we used restraint!"

    I feel better already, after all they're going to use restraint.

  143. Unix Acronyms by mobileskimo · · Score: 1

    Before you get all hot and bothered about that not "really" being an acronym, remember that 'cp' is for 'CoPy', 'ls' is for 'LiSt', 'rm' is for 'ReMove', etc. etc.

    cp ls and rm are not "really" acronyms either. Unlike most acronyms that are used in the english language to shorten very long combination of words to abbreviations easy to remember, speak or type, these unix commands are not very long or very difficult to remember, in full form. GREP maybe.

    I'm not sure why copy list and remove were shortened, perhaps punchcards or something to do with $/character costs, but if anyone's got an explanation or even a theory, I'd like to know.

    --
    "Last one in is a rotten goblin!" - Kepp
  144. Re:No. This is actually a tactic. by praedor · · Score: 1

    What a bunch of poo. I WORK at Grissom ARB (not AFB anymore) and it IS closed down except for a small - pathetically small - core section dedicated to the Reserves. Air Force Reserves (Tanker Squadron, just reduced in size by half a dozen aircraft due to force restructuring - the aircraft have moved to another Reserve unit, don't recall which) is the main host. Other tenet units include very small Navy and Army Reserve units - I work in the shared building with the Navy. The rest of the base is a ghost town; run down bunch of 50's era buildings, some being used by small businesses. The old base housing area is now a fully open civilian housing development. Former military building from Grissom's heyday are now restaurants, VFW posts, and the like.


    The state penitentiary is down the road on what USED to be Grissom AFB property. It is a STATE PEN, not a FEMA/Government "detention center" as members of the "Patriot Movement" seem to want to believe. Sheesh.


    The base itself, what's left of it, is in danger of being closed down all the way. At that point, like every other closed military base derived from the force reductions after Desert Storm, it would be "sold" to civilian concerns to be used as industrial parks, housing, etc, perhaps even small civil airports.


    Your links are nice, paranoid, Deus Ex-inspired cowflops. Some people, bored by the way their lives really are, feel the need to dress up their boring, dreary reality with "exciting" fantasy where they can pretend to be one of the select few "in the know" and may be the hero of the hour with their silly fatigues, toy guns (vs real military hardware), toy "training" (actually gripe/paranoia-spreading meetings about the evil, so-90's, New Word Order where the uneducated "educate" the less educated).


    Nothing to see here (or anywhere in the links provided) folks, just fantasizing and paranoia.

    --
    In Bushworld, they struggle to keep church and state separate in Iraq as they increasingly merge the two in America.
  145. Re:No. This is actually a tactic. by praedor · · Score: 1

    Oh yeah...a suggestion for the mouth breathers that go for all this FEMA/New World Order/UN takeover/detention center crap. Flit about the woods in Oregon (wont say where) and you might well stumble on a PRISON CAMP that isn't on ANY maps that is run by the US GOVERNMENT! Actually, run by the military (wont say which branch). You will see barbed wire, American citizens being required to do hard labor year 'round, with armed military guards WEARING BLACK NONDESCRIPT UNIFORMS!


    I've been there, I know. I did labor in that camp. It rather sucked in a cool way. It is used to teach SURVIVAL and escape and evasion tactics to military personnel that require it. That's right, they (the guv'mnt) create these "labor camps" and man them with evil military instructors to teach military personnel what to expect if captured during wartime, what sort of interrogations to expect, and how to resist. They also give you training on how to escape and evade.


    Go out there as some ya-hoo with a camera and you could produce a spiffy New World Order warning website complete with pictures depicting a "secret" and operational prison camp for Americans. A little (or a lot) of ignorance could be nicely focused into a totally moronic direction and some paranoid delusion about FEMA, etc, could be promulgated based on totally disjointed, out of context photos. Sounds ripe for some "Patriot" to pluck. What say you...have a go? It would be just as good as the links above, and just as valid and "confirmatory" of some paranoid fantasy.

    --
    In Bushworld, they struggle to keep church and state separate in Iraq as they increasingly merge the two in America.
  146. wow...and he developed it all for free... by the-build-chicken · · Score: 2, Funny

    Government coders all over the country marvelled at the cutting edge technology used

    select user_name from everyone where last_purchase = 'box cutter';

  147. Crescent Moon by Jagasian · · Score: 1

    So when is the US government going to start making every Muslim war a crescent moon badge on their outer clothing?

  148. Unstoppable? by wfrp01 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm as anti TIA call up pictures of my mom on a whim as anyone. But I'm pro-technology. In other discussions (p2p, for example) I often argue that the luddites should get out of the way. Technology is progress! If you're not with us, then you are a candlemaker in the age of electricity. Too bad for you.

    I think the same argument applies here. Like it or not, using databases to correlate huge repositories of information is just not that difficult. It's going to happen. How can it be stopped?

    Are there any constitutional provisions protecting us from such technology? Not that I know of. Quite frankly, the constitution is rather ambiguous on the subject of your privacy. Witness the recent bruhaha vis-a-vis sodomy in Texas for example. In that case the Supreme court came down on the side of privacy. How the supremes feel about your medical records, your social security number, your photograph, your fingerprints, your school record, your criminal record, your address, etc. has yet to be determined. It's not so clear that anything in the US constitution protects you from the potential abuses inherent to correlating all that information. The constitution proper primarily concerns itself with what the goverment can do. The Bill of Rights primarily concerns itself with what the government cannot do. As far as I know, there's nothing in there that says the government can't make a database. Funny, it probably never occured to them.

    On the other hand, the constitution doesn't protect you from the abuses inherent to giving everyone ready access to gasoline, either. Are you afraid of gasoline?

    So here's an idea. If the government is going to create vast databases of information about its citizens - fine. But make those databases public. The problem is one of power. If only a few people have access, they have too much power. Give *everyone* access. It's not o.k for John Poindexter to look up pictures of my mom on a whim. But it's o.k. if anyone in the world can do so.

    The truth is the truth. Who's afraid of the truth? The biggest lotto winner who gave millions to churches just had hundreds of thousands of dollars recovered behind the dumpster of the brothel he was visiting. That's the truth. You can read it in the papers. Throw open the bathroom doors! What you do with yourself is the Truth! Let it show, baby!

    Yeah, whatever. I want to poop in private. I believe its my right to do so. I want to fuck in private too. And talk to my doctor about my vascectomy in private. I want my school records to remain private. I want my criminal record, meager as it may be, to remain private also. But I want to know if my neighbor is a child molester.

    My main point is - this is goddamn complicated issue. And I'm getting pretty sick of the typical slashdot rhetoric. I'm not one to post statements to /. about how people how post statements to /. are idiots. Those people truly are. But come on. I don't think the issue or answers here are at all obvious. They are worthy of deep thoughtful discussion. So screw on your thinking caps, and the next time this topic comes up (probably within the next 24 hours) try to add some depth to the conversation. This is a great forum in which to do so. Slashdot is read by millions. Take advantage. Get some good ideas out there. God knows we need them.

    --

    --Lawrence Lessig for Congress!
  149. You Can't Be Private In Public by reallocate · · Score: 1

    I value and protect my privacy as much as anyone, maybe more. But, opposition to government collection and correlation of public data is not opposition to decreased privacy. It's opposition to using information that is already public. Frankly, I'd rather the government did that themselves, rather than let some unaccountable corporation in the private sector do the job.

    (If you're in the U.S.: Quick, tell me the names of the corporations that track your financial transactions and determine your credit rating, and then tell me if you're really comfortable with that.)

    To paraphrase, get over it. The only way to be private is to avoid being public. Got a job? Got a driver's license? A bank account? Buying a house? Renting an apartment? Go to a public school? Use the mail? Ever take a commercial flight? Get married? Get divorced? Ever take out a loan...

    You get the idea. Threats to our privacy do not from improved access to information that's already in the public domain.

    --
    -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"
    1. Re:You Can't Be Private In Public by Frailty · · Score: 1

      Too right! How about "ever been in the military?" I just love the people who say: I'm taking myself "off the grid" so I can live free. Guess what chums, it's those people who are getting watched even closer! We're not at Orwell yet, so take whatever color pill that hold the valium, and give the conspiricy a rest. Macarthyism went away, so did J. Edgar and his freakshow. The CIA kowtow to the White House, the FBi can't even keep accountabilty of their guns and laptops! Honey? have you seen my thinkpad and my glock? No? Oh well, I guess I'll draw new one's at the office. You do the math.

      --
      " My next house will have no kitchen - just vending machines and a large trash can. "
  150. Well fuck by autopr0n · · Score: 1

    I don't suppose these assholes would be kind enough to limit data to citizens of participating states....

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  151. Thought The Matrix was invented by the machines.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... this sound more like SKYNET to me!

  152. This system can work by lommer · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I actually think this system can work, but it needs three major adjustments:

    1) Anyone who wants to access information from this system, for whatever reason, must get a search warrant from a judge before doing so.

    2) People must be allowed to retrieve their own records at will and be permitted to submit corrections to incorrect data.

    3) Public oversight in the form of a third-party's review of the system should be enforced in the form of an annual report to congress or some such body detailing the usage of the system (times it was accessed, by who, for what info, whether a conviction or arrest was ever obtained on the suspect.)

    All in all, I think that enormous databases of information for law enforcement purposes are inevitable, but they need to have appropriate checks and balances in place before they become safe to implement IMHO. None of the current systems or proposals would meet my standards for this, and anyone who thinks that these safeguards would cripple the system with buerocratic inefficiency should go watch the excellent movie Enemy of the State for a quick hollywood-style remider of the consequences of failing to implement appropriate safeguards.

    1. Re:This system can work by Khomar · · Score: 1

      That sounds like a very reasonable proposal to me as well. The problem is that as it now stands, we are relying on the integrity of the individuals running the system without any safeguards. All three points you made will address this by adding accountability to those running the system and the ability of the individual to monitor information about themselves. To allow this kind of power without accountability is asking for trouble. Throughout history, people have done some terrible injustices in what they saw (rightly or wrongly) as a noble cause. This is why you never want to give someone a lot of power with no accountability, even if they seemingly have impeccible integrity.

      I would mod you up, but, obviously, I cannot. :-)

      --

      I believe in de-evolution. God made the world perfect, man fell, and its been going downhill ever since!

  153. What are you talking about? by autopr0n · · Score: 1

    That kind of thing only happens to Arabs. Just Arabs. Okay, just Arabs and Jose Padilla. Even John Walker got a fair trial. I think.

    Anyway, just Arabs, Jose Padilla and John walker. Like I said, nothing to worry about, you're more like to get hit by a bus or something.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  154. Re:I want cameras on every street and ID cards by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

    Yes, pretty much that's true.

    Totalitarian conditions do little to reduce crime anyway. Communist (ahem) Russia has a remarkably high crime rate, a world-class Mafia second-to-none, a thriving black market, and a government bureaucracy that is corrupt to the core.

    There is a difference between being able to abuse a citizen whenever desired (think men in suits knocking on your door at 3 am) and having total control over said citizen, meaning that the citizen will always do what his government wants/expects. Abusive governments abound, but people still find ways to do what they want to do anyway. They just have to learn to hide it better.

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  155. Hm. You sound like you almost know something. by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 2, Funny
    Well, of course there are going to be rational excuses in place for creating all this prison storage space. And, um, Training, did you say you were involved with?

    FEMA is a real agency. Indeed, they were the ones in charge of New York during the 9-11 circus. Between them and the Patriot act, and various other creepy laws, (some of which are discussed breifly here ) once a crisis has been declared, it will be entirely 'legal' to put virtually anybody in prison for whatever reason some chump in a uniform decides is good enough for him.

    If the sliver of perspective you have leads you to feel safe and secure, then that's fine. That's your choice. But don't describe my concerns as "Fantasy" and "Paranoia".

    Not when the current government is filled with liars, who through their lies send kids off to war against nations which posed no threat, and who do it for no other reason than Greed. There is no argument here. None. If you give me one, it had better be good, because I've heard all the bullshit there is so far, and it all comes from people who don't think and who don't read anything but the state and Zionist-owned idiot media. Bush and his gang are LIARS, plain and simple. --And if you bothered to look at some of the information which is freely available, you would not only recognize this, but also the fact that those lies are directly responsible for the current miserable state of the economy, and of War against straw-man villains.

    When the axe falls, and it WILL, you sound like you're a ripe candidate for the 4th option, (the one I specifically decided not to mention last post); and that is, "Be one of the assholes shooting civilians."

    How was it put. . . "The people would rather believe a simple lie than a complex truth."


    -FL

  156. Coincidence? by Frailty · · Score: 1

    Is it at all surprising that this has originated in a fiefdom of the Bush Junta?? Do they really think this will succeed? Hell if the average American can download Spectre Gunship footage, AND Coeds Gone Crazy with impunity, what is the NSA/CIA/FBI/AFU, really going to find? Not a whole hell of a lot I bet. This too shall pass, just like yesterdays Taco Bell; it stinks and maybe burns a little but you get over it.

    --
    " My next house will have no kitchen - just vending machines and a large trash can. "
  157. Re:Hm. You sound like you almost know something. by praedor · · Score: 1

    Yes, thank GAWD for FEMA. They were there recently (near Grissom by the way) after the flooding that occurred in the county. Lots of lost and damaged homes - people are still recovering.


    I was on duty at Grissom right in the middle of it. I ran into a couple fo the "evil" FEMA dudes at a local hotel. Evil schmucks - all regular guys and gals like my neighbors. No doubt, under their pullover FEMA t-shirts they had body armor and enough firepower to make Duke Nukem envious.


    You honestly don't know word one about what your are talking about. FEMA exists, yes, because they are NEEDED. Who else is going to respond (and respond quickly) to a disaster to make sure that people have shelter, food, medical treatment, and that resources are made available for cleanup and rebuilding? Think that "just happens" on its own? Nope. The guvmnt is DOING ITS JOB when it sends in FEMA and the Guard after a disaster of some type.


    Under Natl Guard rule (after hurricanes, flooding, etc) they are there to provide aid but also to keep order, prevent looting, etc. Their rules for dealing with such are quite a bit different than normal cops. Get over it. It has ALWAYS been that way (and you will welcome FEMA and the Guard if ever you are caught up in the midst of a huge disaster, whether it is a massive tornado wiping out EVERYTHING you own, monstrous hurricans, or a terrorist attack - you would prefer nothing happen when some terror group - perhaps a "Patriot Movement" group - releases sarin or plague in your area? Or perhaps someone sets off a dirty bomb...FEMA has no place? The Guard has no place? Federal Emergency Management Administration. Their job is to manage recovery after disasters/emergency situations. Under the most extreme situations, the Prez can CONSTITUTIONALLY declare martial law - that's built in by design for good reason - to prevent chaos, anarchy, lawlessness, and to aid in rapid recovery to normal. Get over it and grow up.


    I suppose all state pennitentiaries or federal prisons are actually "evil" prison camps intended to imprison general citizenry...and they should all therefore be eliminated. No more prisons. Yeah, that sounds good.


    Naturally, I am wasting breath here. Some people are determined to live a fantasy out of a video game, and pretend they're some kind of Rambo-like hero waiting to save the day. Go back to your boring, quiet job at the gas station or with the sanitation department. My trash is ready to be taken to the dump.

    --
    In Bushworld, they struggle to keep church and state separate in Iraq as they increasingly merge the two in America.
  158. WARNING: false positives swamp genuine hits in TIA by stridebird · · Score: 2, Interesting

    As it was explained to me recently, the problem with a TIA system is the problem of false positives....let's say:

    population : 250,000,000

    TIA is 99% likely to match a "bad guy"

    lets assume there are 1000 bad guys in the population (ok lets say "really really bad guys" then)

    the system finds 99%of them : 990 positive profiles

    But let's say the TIA is 0.1% likely to falsely finger someone:

    the system produces 250,000 false positives...

    So now you have 990 + 250,000 = 250,990 profiles to examine and in fact, only 0.25% of them are geniuine. The rest get their doors kicked in after midnight as the suede-denim secret police blithely take the algorithm to its logical conclusion.

    Be afraid, be very afraid.

  159. Re:No. This is actually a tactic. by kindbud · · Score: 1

    (Here's another with site with some photos, --one including a shot of a placard with a date stamp, reading "Jun 00", presumably indicating a construction date shortly after Shrub's election. This particular set of photos is of an un-manned camp, hence the ability to take photos).

    It's also not in Mississippi as the site claims. Look further down the list of photos: there's a STOP sign with with lettering STANI. There's also a mile-marker sign showing 17.4 km to Srebrenica, and 0.5 km to Kadanj.

    This camp is in Bosnia-Herzegovina, not Mississippi.

    --
    Edith Keeler Must Die
  160. Re:I want cameras on every street and ID cards by sploxx · · Score: 1

    You are probably right if you are considering "effective" in the pure economic way. I meant effective as "to catch as many criminals as possible whilst being as most non-intrusive as possible."

  161. Yes. Reply only to what you (think) you know. . , by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1
    and leave my other points untouched.

    Bush is still a liar. The laws on the books still allow FEMA to incarcerate people without any hope of their being redressed in a civilian court under constitutional law.

    And yes, I already agreed that these agencies exist on (semi)-logical grounds and that there is a reason for it being so. But you seem not to have read that either.

    You are clearly only listening to the things you want to hear. --As for your glib comment about the US prison system. . , has it never occurred to you as strange that the prison population of the U.S. is higher per capita than it has EVER been before in the history of the U.S.? --And not just by a couple of small percentage points either. Tacitus once warned us, "The more corrupt the republic, the more numerous the laws."

    And as for Dirty Bombs and such going off in my neighborhood. . , well, I suspect that such things would be the result of the same people who engineered 9-11. Which, if you examine the mountain of evidence available, you would soon realize was none other than parts of your own government.

    But maybe you'll only laugh at that rather than do any reading. --Heck, as evidenced here, you seem reluctant to read a basic post on Slashdot properly.

    You also seem to think that it is impossible for the fine, regular men and women in FEMA, (and other agencies), to do dastardly things. Let me ask you this: Would you put me in a pen if your CO told you I was a terrorist but furnished no proof? (They don't give evidence to soldiers, do they?)

    There's your answer.

    And by the way, if you want to make single carriage returns between your paragraphs rather than leave those big oaf-spaces, you should put a 'BR' between the greater/less-than signs rather than a 'P'. --Not that I'd expect you to know such a detail. Research would have been required for that!

    Are you catching my drift here. . ?


    -FL

  162. UFBAPOEFE? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That won't work. You've got to be able to make a neat abbreviation out of it.