Slashdot Mirror


Dell Announces New Music Player, Download Service

gotr00t writes "It appears that Dell Computer Corp. has announced that by the end of the year, they will have released their digital audio player, known in short as the 'Dell DJ.' Along with the player, there will also be a digital music download service. Looks like Dell is also joining Apple in the consumer products category."

453 comments

  1. dude... by foobar31337 · · Score: 5, Funny

    so now can i get the Dude You're Gettin a Dell song from them for only $1? No way dude! I'm gettin a dell now!

    1. Re:dude... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aaaaaaah ... the sweet and intoxicating smell of vaporware!

    2. Re:dude... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Dude, you're getting a Dell" guy got dumped by Dell when he awas arrested for pot.

      Dell is ghey, with a capital G. (That would be Ghey for all you smart types.)

    3. Re:dude... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dude what does my tat say?

    4. Re:dude... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sweet what does my tat say?

    5. Re:dude... by weileong · · Score: 1


      Looks like Dell is also joining Apple in the consumer products category

      I'm not sure you can say Dell is joining Apple in the category ... for Apple users - ever since his "Apple should be shut down and the money returned to shareholders" comment, Dell is "The Enemy".

      I think various Apple user groups probably hold meetings where they burn Micheal Dell in effigy.

  2. Holy crap that thing's ugly by noewun · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In more serious news, Dell will need to have Apple's marketing savvy to have Apple's success, and I don't think they do.

    --
    I am a believer of momentum and curves.
    1. Re:Holy crap that thing's ugly by rpozz · · Score: 2

      Yeah, they'll also need to sell an attractive, high quality product with good tech support. No chance.

    2. Re:Holy crap that thing's ugly by igabe · · Score: 1

      Up close and personal. Get a look at this b****.

      =)

      http://www.businesswire.com/photowire/pw.092503/ bb 8a.jpg

      --
      tilTrue.info contechtext.info prettypowerful.info twitter.com/frets fb.com/prosody
    3. Re:Holy crap that thing's ugly by KevinIsOwn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Way to provide evidence. Anyone can make a brash claim like that.

      If you look at Dell's past marketing endevours they have been quite successful at getting their products all over TV. They have been especially successful at creating memorable TV commercials, one of the more important aspects of marketing. (Dude, you got a Dell!)

    4. Re:Holy crap that thing's ugly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, they will only need a 10th of the marketing saavy since the only have to attract a small percentage of the PC market to compete with Apple in numbers.

      This should be a piece of cake for them

    5. Re:Holy crap that thing's ugly by wo1verin3 · · Score: 1

      >>Yeah, they'll also need to sell an attractive,
      >>high quality product with good tech support.
      >>No chance.

      And to compete they'll need to ability to burn these files to CD as you can do with iTunes and will be able to do with Napster.

    6. Re:Holy crap that thing's ugly by christopher240240 · · Score: 1

      Holy crap! Have you ever heard of market share?

    7. Re:Holy crap that thing's ugly by noewun · · Score: 1

      And how well are Dell's various non-computer consumer products selling? From the numbers I've seen, not to well. A lot of people I know won't even use Dell's PCs for fear of quality concerns.

      --
      I am a believer of momentum and curves.
    8. Re:Holy crap that thing's ugly by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1

      In more serious news, Dell will need to have Apple's marketing savvy to have Apple's success, and I don't think they do.

      Heh. Somehow the conditioning hasn't worn off from the dark years. You say "Apple's marketing savvy," and I still think, "oxymoron."

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    9. Re:Holy crap that thing's ugly by Chuck+Bucket · · Score: 4, Informative
    10. Re:Holy crap that thing's ugly by waynelorentz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you look at Dell's past marketing endevours they have been quite successful at getting their products all over TV

      Of course their products are all over TV -- they're buying ads! Buying a bunch of TV commericals isn't the same thing as marketing success. The Ronko Turnip Twaddler (or whatever) isn't a massive marketing success just because it's on TV all the time.

    11. Re:Holy crap that thing's ugly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Dell will need to have Apple's marketing savvy to have Apple's success

      You have to be pretty savvy to take a 70% marketshare and whittle it down to 2%.

    12. Re:Holy crap that thing's ugly by Kelz · · Score: 1

      Oh yes the switch campaign was soooo much better than the farking interns.

    13. Re:Holy crap that thing's ugly by LionMage · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Yes, I have. Although Apple has very low market share among all personal computer manufacturers, they have very large market share (well over 50%, last I checked) among all vendors of digital audio players.

      The iPod pretty much dominates the market for MP3 players. Making the iPod compatible with PCs was a brilliant move, and it'll take a lot more than Dell's share of the personal computer market to shove the Dell DJ down people's throats.

      Some market share stats for the iPod: There's been an explosion of iPod sales this year, fueled initially by the availability of an iPod version for Windows, and then later by a version that works with both Macs and Wintel PCs, and supports both FireWire and USB 2.0.

      And yeah, the Dell DJ really is ugly as sin.
    14. Re:Holy crap that thing's ugly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now if we can get listings for capacities, prices, storage format, USB/firewire, availability. And does it play real MP3s? Or only crappy low bitrate AAC?

      This is better than Kazaa in what way? Or even the new NEX II from Frontier, the one with FM.

      Dorky /., prints press releases, but no followup. Typical journalist.

    15. Re:Holy crap that thing's ugly by noewun · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Considering this shows the iPod at #1 in dollar market share and within 1.5% of #1 in total numbers sold, I'd say Apple's marketing ability is pretty good.

      --
      I am a believer of momentum and curves.
    16. Re:Holy crap that thing's ugly by callipygian-showsyst · · Score: 1
      Apple's Success?

      You know, if you bought EXXON stock and APPLE stock when apple went public back in 1982, you'd be WAY AHEAD with EXXON!

      See this chart

      I don't hear anyone here praising Exxon! Yet they're clearly a better company (as were nearly all DOW companies over the same period.)

      Apple wasn't the first with a portable music player (think Sony Walkman) and Apple wasn't the first with a portable MP3 player (think Rio). And just because they've hyped the iPod (and yes, I own one!) doesn't mean they "invented" it or that they're better than anyone else.

    17. Re:Holy crap that thing's ugly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is better than Kazaa in what way?

      Legal.

      But it's just barely better than Kazaa. It's pretty shitty compared to iPod and iMusic.

    18. Re:Holy crap that thing's ugly by rolocroz · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Well, Belgium you!

      --

      I meta-mod all positive moderation Unfair, because it's abuse of the system.

    19. Re:Holy crap that thing's ugly by bob670 · · Score: 1

      Whatever you say there sparky, the iPod would sell like mad if the price wasn't so silly, the Dell MP3 player will be everywhere.

    20. Re:Holy crap that thing's ugly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's also six months old. iPod stormed into first place in units sold a long time ago.

    21. Re:Holy crap that thing's ugly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Actually, yeah, they are better than anyone else. There are more iPods being sold every quarter than all other portable digital music players COMBINED (not counting CD players).

    22. Re:Holy crap that thing's ugly by KevinIsOwn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well actually Ronco's products are generally successes because of his marketing skill. I'm not saying just because you are on TV you will get sales. I'm saying that effective ads will get purchases, and if the product is solid more purchases will come as a result

    23. Re:Holy crap that thing's ugly by noewun · · Score: 1

      I know. I can't seem to find any recent sales numbers, tho.

      --
      I am a believer of momentum and curves.
    24. Re:Holy crap that thing's ugly by KevinIsOwn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Lets face it, most of the people use /.ers know are fairly computer saavy. Dell has a reputation among many of the people I know who know nothing about computers as having good tech support. To a nerd, good tech support really just doesn't exist (Lets face it, we think we know more no matter what and will not be satisfied that we had to stoop to the level of tech support)

    25. Re:Holy crap that thing's ugly by maddskillz · · Score: 4, Interesting

      They might have had good tech support, but have you tried calling them lately? They have really cut corners lately. There corporate support is still good, but there consumer report is absolute crap.

    26. Re:Holy crap that thing's ugly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hate to have to agree but I think that the Dell "DJ" will be everywhere simply because of the price. If it's anything like most other Dell products I've used it will be of qustionable design and support but at a better price point than anyone else on the market for what you get. Not a better player but a better value. More people drive Corrolas than Porsches too. I think I'll stick with my iPod.

    27. Re:Holy crap that thing's ugly by Guido+von+Guido · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Absolutely true.

      But you're comparing, uh, apples and oranges. They're in different industries, and oddly enough stocks in different industries often perform poorly. You should have compared them to another tech stock.

      Granted, I'm sure you could find tech stocks (even besides Microsoft) which have done better since then, but that doesn't make the comparison any better.

    28. Re:Holy crap that thing's ugly by bob670 · · Score: 1

      I would rather have functions and money in my pocket than "design" and a long term loan to pay for a tech toy. As always, while really nice and a beautiful total package, it is all grossly over priced.

    29. Re:Holy crap that thing's ugly by jimbolaya · · Score: 1

      Remember that the iPod is the number one selling portable music player for all platforms, not just Mac. Dell does have to compete with that.

      --

      There ain't no rules here; we're trying to accomplish something.

    30. Re:Holy crap that thing's ugly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're absolutely wrong. The consumer support is top-notch.

    31. Re:Holy crap that thing's ugly by nolife · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Considering Dell has $35 Billion in annual sales compared to Apples $1.5 billion, I think you may want to reconsider who is having more success right now.

      I forgot, just mention Apple in good terms and get +5 insightful.

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
    32. Re:Holy crap that thing's ugly by ProfessionalCookie · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Holy Crap! you're right... and I thought you were kidding- this thing really is as ugly as sin... I should know I've been wallowing in sin for ages.

      Thank you Jesus for saving us... and for iPods.

    33. Re:Holy crap that thing's ugly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah...all Dell needs is a multitude of moronic human beings to market to.

    34. Re:Holy crap that thing's ugly by Vengeful+weenie · · Score: 1

      Nope. They need to be functional and cheap. Apple has the first quality, Dell the second. Now, who wants to pony up their money?

    35. Re:Holy crap that thing's ugly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, they clock out at 5PM, but they're really still there.

      Don't give up!

    36. Re:Holy crap that thing's ugly by javaaddikt · · Score: 1

      That's why you place your order through the small business division--just make up a company name.

    37. Re:Holy crap that thing's ugly by zurab · · Score: 4, Informative
      USA (currently): 58%


      Not true. If you read the article you are referencing, it states clearly about the Q4 2002 sales of portable MP3 players:

      US Retail Dollar Market Share for MP3 Players Q4 2002 %
      APPLE 26.98
      RIO 10.13
      ... etc.

      The above is as far as dollar amounts. As far as actual units sold in the same quarter:

      US Retail Unit Market Share for MP3 Players Q4 2002 %
      RCA 12.95
      RIO 11.27
      APPLE 11.23
      ... etc.

      So, Apple generated the most revenue during 2002 Q4 among all other competitors in the U.S., but as far as units sold they are behind RCA and RIO.

      As far as your figure of 58%, it comes from the following statement:

      The latest market share numbers show the Windows version of the iPod is the most popular product, controlling 58 percent of the units sold, compared to 42 percent for the Mac version.

      This sentence is somewhat poorly worded (and taken a little out of context as well), but my reading is that out of all iPod sales, Windows version had a share of 58%, and Mac version had a share of 42%. Also as evidenced by the numbers presented, RCA and RIO are actually outselling iPod in terms of units sold. So, assuming those relative trends it would be impossible for iPod to hold 58% market share in unit shipments in the PC market.

      Having said that, I would like to see more recent numbers from 2003, and over a longer period of time than just one quarter. If anyone has seen such information or reports, it would be interesting to look at.
    38. Re:Holy crap that thing's ugly by netsharc · · Score: 2, Insightful

      IMO, It just doesn't look as attractive as an iPod.. only Apple can make hardware so sexy, and they (Dell) had to come up with something different to be "original". Unfortunately the iPod probably ranks as the world's sexiest MP3 player, and Dell can only settle for place 2, at best. And the way the thing looks, it didn't make it into the top-10 list.

      --
      What time is it/will be over there? Check with my iPhone app!
    39. Re:Holy crap that thing's ugly by some+damn+guy · · Score: 1

      If I know Dell, their brilliant move will be making their's a hell of a lot cheaper without sacrificing quality- even if it is less sexy.

      I'll take the ugly one, thanks. It's just a damn box that plays music anyway.

    40. Re:Holy crap that thing's ugly by King_TJ · · Score: 1

      No - that's why you choose to take your business elsewhere, to a company that is as accomodating to the individual home user as to the small business owner.

      Dell's small business division isn't so teriffic on support either, IMHO. I dealt with them quite a bit when I did corporate buying for a small business. They pulled some nasty stunts on us, leading us to seek out other vendors - despite using all Dell for 7+ years before that.

      (As one example, they switched over from their original "NET 30" payment terms on our business purchases to outsourcing the financing to a bank, who was effectively putting all of our Dell purchases on a credit card. Of course, they neglected to inform us of this change. We only found out when we disputed a charge for items we never received one time, and all of a sudden, a bank started demanding payment with late charges added. Even after Dell removed the incorrect charges, the bank still wanted those late fees and interest accrued!)

    41. Re:Holy crap that thing's ugly by jeffphil · · Score: 1

      But then you get charged sales tax. Consumer products bought online are not taxed.

    42. Re:Holy crap that thing's ugly by cybrthng · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Corporate support is absolute crap. We buy 2500 pc's every 2 years and they can't get that right even though its a 2+ million dollar deal!

      Not to mention they can't re-brand anything and sell it correctly. We bought a 1 terrabyte clarrion storage system form them and went directly with EMC for another cabinet and 2 more terrabytes of space and had alot less headaches and hassles.

      It appears dell no longer has any talent, and what they do have is stuck on location and not answering the phones!

      Not to worry, compaq/hp is in a similar boat and they're work hard to get rid of them as well!

      The IT world in general blows. We let microsoft ship buggy software, we pay oracle millions to fix stuff that never worked to begin with, we buy overly priced purple nurples from dell and we work day in and day out to fix sh*t that shouldn't need fixing all because alot of the time the right people are not in the right place doing the job correctly the first time.

      Its all about MONEY and not a product anymore.

      Whatever happened to selling pride, selling a service and selling quality. Hell, the only company i see selling that image is Chevy and even they're in such a crunch they don't push it like they used to.

      oh well.

      Dell sucks, end of story. If they can't support an over priced 1500.00 pc how the hell are they going to support download music and 99.00 to 199.00 devices to the masses?

    43. Re:Holy crap that thing's ugly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Luckily I like to listen to my MP3 players, not fuck them, so sexiness isn't one of the main criteria I use when picking one.

      If it's as small and light as an iPod and less expensive, Dell will sell a boat load of them.

    44. Re:Holy crap that thing's ugly by vonFinkelstien · · Score: 1

      "As the Apple Turns" describes it as "an iPod after a 20-minute beatdown with the Ugly Stick."

    45. Re:Holy crap that thing's ugly by mesach · · Score: 1

      What's your top 10 list consist of?

      'cause lemme tell you that thing is ALOT better than most I have seen. Sure its got some roller thingy instead of a touchpad rotary dial, but you ever try the archos tank? personally I dont like the liferaft/Oil drum flotilla styling of the archos

      If Dell takes some ques from apple and starts putting some effort into "designing" things, then Mikey will become even more of a powerhouse in the computing industry. I'm waiting for a cool looking PC out of the box.

      --
      moo.
    46. Re:Holy crap that thing's ugly by ruiner13 · · Score: 1
      "They might have had good tech support..."

      I'd have to disagree. My ex-girlfriend was having problems with her dell, and the first support rep we talked to, unable to diagnose the problem with his unplug the computer, plug it back in and try again solution recommended that she "take a shotgun, aim it at the monitor, and fire." Despite the fact that the monitor was still working perfectly. Unlike the computer. After telling them repeatedly that I thought it was a bad power supply, they decided that it was probably the motherboard. Nope. Then they sent a new processor. Nope. Finally, I got them to send a new power supply, as I had originally asked them for. BINGO! It was a bad power supply capacitor.

      Yeah, Dell has great support.

      --

      today is spelling optional day.

    47. Re:Holy crap that thing's ugly by mesach · · Score: 1

      So then it breaks down like this.

      Pretty
      Functional
      Cheap

      Pick two.

      --
      moo.
    48. Re:Holy crap that thing's ugly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hate to say it, but HP, previously maker of butt-ugly Pavilion PCs, actually has some pretty nice looking models these days.

    49. Re:Holy crap that thing's ugly by s.fontinalis · · Score: 1

      Obviously you've never tried to contact them - I tried to find out if they'd received my order(they never sent an e-mail confirmation) It took 20 minutes on the phone - through 11 menus, and then 10 minutes on hold to get an answer. All to correct for their f-up. That sucks.

    50. Re:Holy crap that thing's ugly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But Corollas are also much more reliable than Porsches.

    51. Re:Holy crap that thing's ugly by s.fontinalis · · Score: 1

      Huh? In most states if your purchasing for a busine you *don't* pay sales tax - which is why the business account at Costco is wonderful. Of course I live in Oregon - so no one pays sales tax.

    52. Re:Holy crap that thing's ugly by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1

      I know. But in the un-Jobs years, Apple's marketting was horrible.

      They forgot why people should have a Mac. It was crap.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    53. Re:Holy crap that thing's ugly by saden1 · · Score: 1

      iPod is light? Try lugging that around in the gym. I like my iRiver even though it doesn't have as much space...it makes up for it with battery life though. 17 hours can't be beat!

      --

      -----
      One is born into aristocracy, but mediocrity can only be achieved through hard work.
    54. Re:Holy crap that thing's ugly by nelsonal · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah and a car is just a box that gets you from place to place, but I'd rather be seen in something like this, than something like this. Even if both will get me from place to place equally quickly (at the speed limit), economically, and safely.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    55. Re:Holy crap that thing's ugly by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 2, Funny
      In more serious news, Dell will need to have Apple's marketing savvy to have Apple's success, and I don't think they do.

      No, to compete with Apple you just need a rabid fanatical customer base that is content at paying higher than industry average prices for average electronic equipment.
      - Mac user. :-)

    56. Re:Holy crap that thing's ugly by archen · · Score: 1

      I work for a small business and that shure hasn't helped us. If you don't know your customer number off hand, then they'll never be able to find it - happened 5 times already! Anything ordered through the website usually involves 3 additional calls in order to actually get an item. To get a shelf for a rack to 2 weeks with 15 calls and 3 e-mails. And we're supposidly at the $100k level (as my boss fed them some bs about spending 100 grand on IT). It's not like Dell stuff is super cheap either. I hate to wonder what sort of treatment smaller buisnesses get!

      We still get Dell stuff every now and then, but when we do get it, it's through ebay.

    57. Re:Holy crap that thing's ugly by lucifuge31337 · · Score: 1

      The IT world in general blows. We let microsoft ship buggy software, we pay oracle millions to fix stuff that never worked to begin with, we buy overly priced purple nurples from dell and we work day in and day out to fix sh*t that shouldn't need fixing all because alot of the time the right people are not in the right place doing the job correctly the first time.

      My theory, which keeps getting proven true, is that the bulk of the people in IT (and other technical jobs for that matter) are employed one or two levels above their competency.
      Take that moron network administrator who thinks powerfailing the 3660 is the best way to handle EVERY problem and put him on desktop support. He's instantly a better employee.
      Take the server admin who can't get any of the backend stuff right and put him on desktops as well.
      Now take the seemingly moronic architects that you hired to design a scalable solution which turned out to be scalable by a factor of .01 when you actually tried to implement the plan. Put them on infrastructure and they aren't so incompetent.
      And then resign yourself to the fact that you're going to have to pay real money for the architect. Becuase CHI, Cittone, etc doesn't produce experience. They just produce people with a minimal base technical education and a few pieces of paper.

      --
      Do not fold, spindle or mutilate.
    58. Re:Holy crap that thing's ugly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HAHAHA, funny moderation here. Parent posts about Dell never being capable of being as successful as Apple and it is +5 insightful, someone else posts a reply with some sales figures which seems to indicate the exact opposite and it is modded as offtopic. Apple Zealots unite!! Mod all positive Apple posts +5!!!!

    59. Re:Holy crap that thing's ugly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they already have 37% of the pocket pc market with their axims. This product will be similar - it is not a great innovation, and it will not have the cutting edge features, but it will be probably 30-40% less in price than any comparible mp3 player of similar capacity.

    60. Re:Holy crap that thing's ugly by nothingtodo · · Score: 1

      Tech support for the servers is fine. I can tell I get someone in the states and there's no communication problems and the calltakers seem competent.
      However, for the Optiplex and consumer models, it's outsourced overseas. Calltakers are obviously reading from a script and probably have little or no proficiency in computers. On the Delltalk boards, there's plenty of complaints about piss-poor tech support.

      --
      -- After all is said and done, more is said than done.
    61. Re:Holy crap that thing's ugly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny, they seem to have no trouble outselling Apple in just about everything else. It's not like everyone's a sucker for flash.

    62. Re:Holy crap that thing's ugly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Not to mention they can't re-brand anything and sell it correctly. We bought a 1 terrabyte clarrion storage system form them and went directly with EMC for another cabinet and 2 more terrabytes of space and had alot less headaches and hassles.

      We've had great luck with Dell desktops and laptops, but I'd never consider buying other stuff from them. I can't image why you did.

      You never said where you like to buy desktops, so your whole rant is worthless. You say, "Dell Sucks", but then say "Everybody Sucks". That just tells me your a bitter whiner. It doesn't tell me anything about Dell.

    63. Re:Holy crap that thing's ugly by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Wow, here's my recipe for industrial design of a DJ:

      1 Part Palm Zire (case)
      1 Part Apple Metal (face)
      1 Part Apple iPod (screen)

      Stir. Bake for 3 years. Serves 1.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    64. Re:Holy crap that thing's ugly by some+damn+guy · · Score: 1

      Equally economically except for the the $24,000 price difference, of course :)

    65. Re:Holy crap that thing's ugly by shotfeel · · Score: 1

      How do you define "grossly over priced"?

      Is the profit margin on the iPod really any higher than any other mp3 player? Have you figured in the engineering and design costs?

      Just because one company charges more for a "similar" product, it doesn't mean its overpriced. After all, isn't a $50,000 car "similar" to a $20,000 car? Does that mean the %50,000 car is overpriced, or just engineered and built with a different set of design goals and priorities?

    66. Re:Holy crap that thing's ugly by LionMage · · Score: 1

      Crap, you're right. I was confused by the wording of the article I cited.

      Damn. Well, the statistics for 2002 are still good numbers, but I agree with you, I'd like to see 2003 sales figures and statistics on iPod market share.

    67. Re:Holy crap that thing's ugly by lowmagnet · · Score: 1

      Like the Optiplex SX 260 we have to replace in the lab because the power mount is becoming unsoldered. Or the two for which we already got replacement hard drives. Servers from Dell are solid, but their mid-level products are shite.

      --
      Heute die Welt, morgen das Sonnensystem!
    68. Re:Holy crap that thing's ugly by lowmagnet · · Score: 1

      Pretty and functional, thanks. Cheap is relative, anyway.

      --
      Heute die Welt, morgen das Sonnensystem!
    69. Re:Holy crap that thing's ugly by bob670 · · Score: 1

      Bullshit, Apple products are over priced. I have owned Macs, the fit and finish isn't nearly as nice as everyone makes it out to be, and the prices are grossly out of line. And we aren't talking about cars, which is the weakest ananlogy everyone trots out with consumer electronics and computers. Put an iMac next to a Dell 8xxx series and compare the parts people actually use. The Dell wins hands down. Who gives an F about the case, it's nice to see some improved design, but give me a break. Same goes for the iPod, if you can give me the same functions but it looks a little less "cool" I'm all over it. That's the whole problem with the Apple crowd, it's all about being seen and having that air that you were smart enough to buty the "better" platform. Fucking smug assholes, and hell yes it's flamebait, you dumb ass mods have at it.

    70. Re:Holy crap that thing's ugly by jeffphil · · Score: 1

      In most states, you do have to pay sales tax for business. Dell doesn't charge state sales tax if you are in a state that does not have sales tax - like Oregon, or if you buy from the home division directly on the Internet. If you call your order in, and live in a state with sales tax, then they will charge it whether for home or business.

      This site has the details between home and business.

  3. heh by klocwerk · · Score: 1

    'cause dell didn't make consumer products before...?

    This was making the rounds on Fatwallet.com this morning. We'll see if it can compete with the IPod which already has a solid foot in the market.

    --

    "You worthless post!"
    -Shakespeare, 2 Gentlemen of Verona, 1. 1. 147
    1. Re:heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God I hate people who use "IPod". Probably says he has a "McIntosh" computer.

  4. Yet another music service? by elid · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What we need is a music service that doesn't impose draconian so-called copy-protection measures on its audio files. We'll just have to wait and see.

    1. Re:Yet another music service? by noewun · · Score: 1

      I think the iTMS - or something very similar - is about as close as we will get.

      --
      I am a believer of momentum and curves.
    2. Re:Yet another music service? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      emusic.com

    3. Re:Yet another music service? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about "a music service that doesn't impose draconian so-called copy-protection measures on its audio files" for those of us that dont but enough to make subscriptions worth while? or one where we can keep the music after the subscription is up?

    4. Re:Yet another music service? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We do. It's called Kazaa.

    5. Re:Yet another music service? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now the other 97% of us need something like that.

    6. Re:Yet another music service? by Hamhock · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What, may I ask, is draconian about the iTunes music store's copy-protection measures? I can put the files I've bought on my three Macs, I can burn as many CDs as I want and give them to my friends and family to listen to (or listen to them [the burnt CDs] on any other computer), and I can put them on my iPod. No, I can't share them with complete strangers, but I'm not likely to that with anything else I own either. It's pretty darned reasonable in my eyes.

      --
      Two Minus Three Equals Negative Fun -Troy McClure
    7. Re:Yet another music service? by fermion · · Score: 2, Insightful
      And that, for me is the issue. I want to with music what I have always done with music. I want to copy it, share it, and archive. I am not going to put it up on some peer to peer network and share it, but if five of my closest friends want a copy, I will not say no.

      This is the way it has always been. I buy an LP. I make couple of copies on tape for myself. I might make a few copies for friends. The LP is seldom played.

      Now, I am not a person who thought twice about spending a big chunk of change upgrading my LPs to CDs. And frankly I have little problem buying CDs at 15 dollars a piece. Before the RIAA began wasting the courts time I did it quite often. Furthermore if hi quality MP3s, or simliar format, say at least 256 kbs directly from the studio masters, were avaible and the price were cut to 10 or so, I would be all over that. As long as the formate was not encumbered.

      That is why I only bought a few songs from Apple. Why should I pay money for something that I have to burn and re-rip just to do with it as I please. What kind of degradation is going to occur. I can wait a few months and get the CD for 5 or 6 bucks.

      I'm sorry, but this protection racket has been tried in software. It only works sometimes, and only works well if you are a monopoly. It is stupid for musician to want a protection racket. I know in this age of wal mart and best buy assuming all their customers are criminals has destroyed the self esteem of the formerly freedom loving and self respecting U.S. resident, but how much more are we going to take?

      I pay for most music. I pay for most software. The companies seem to doing well. The ones that aren't are the small ones who succumb to the questionable competitive behaviors of the big one. Sell me a product that I can use, and I will pay for it. Assume that I am inherently evil, and no matte how cheap the product is, I will just move on.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    8. Re:Yet another music service? by thisissilly · · Score: 1

      You only have to sign up for a 3-month subscription at $15/month--basically, one CD a month, cost wise. And you do keep emusic's mp3s when your subscription is up. They're standard VBR mp3s. You download them, they are yours, even if you don't resubscribe.

    9. Re:Yet another music service? by Quobobo · · Score: 1

      True, the iTunes music store is better than some, but I don't want any restrictions on something that I pay for. I can go out and buy a CD that has zero copy protection so I can use it how I want. However, AAC files will not play on a variety of devices other than computers, and on top of that I'm limited by the DRM. Why would I buy Apple's music when I can buy a CD that I can use however I want? P.S. Burning or converting the files to another format is not a valid solution, so nobody try to bring that up. Generation loss is not acceptable for me.

    10. Re:Yet another music service? by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      well, uless you are REALLY into getting music off a CD, in a few years, you will have to jump through so many damn loops that CDs will not be a viable media to use to get portable media from.

      BTW, AAC is going to be supported soon as it is a standard format. I bet that in 10 years, we will have CDs with only WMA or AAC files on them that willplay in CD-Players but have DRM set up with them, so you will have to deal with generation loss sooner or later anyway.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    11. Re:Yet another music service? by cappadocius · · Score: 1
      It certainly isn't draconian, but the DRM in iTMS is not always invisible to the casual user (that was the idea, and it is the sort of standard that users hold Apple to).

      The key is that the three macs you put the files onto might all be the same mac, if you run into Hard Drive problems. Yes, you can always convert the files to AIFFs, which don't rely on having the DRM key, or burn CD backups, but the fact remains that the inherent instability of computers (including Macs) creates problems when DRM is concerned.

      That said, I think the reduced price-tag tends to outweigh the DRM annoyances.

      --

      omnia tua castra sunt nobis

    12. Re:Yet another music service? by fupeg · · Score: 1

      How about so you can buy "Boys of Summer" for $1 instead of having to buy the whole crappy Ataris CD?

    13. Re:Yet another music service? by CaptBubba · · Score: 1
      Phillips would have something to say about your opinion. They've already stated as the overseer of the red-book format, that discs with copy protection are not CDs, and cannot be called CDs. They even want a big warning sticker stuck to them warning that they are not CDs, in addition to having them separated from "true" CDs.

      The future of copy protection is in new formats, such as DVD-A and SACD. The big question is how the RIAA is going to get people to buy these discs which offer very little over the CD and significantly less freedom.

      10 years from now the CD will no longer be the prefered media, if only for the reason of forcing people to replace their old collections again.

    14. Re:Yet another music service? by shepd · · Score: 1

      >How about "a music service that doesn't impose draconian so-called copy-protection measures on its audio files" for those of us that dont but enough to make subscriptions worth while? or one where we can keep the music after the subscription is up?

      Hmmm, ok. Here it is. Sorry you didn't hear about it the first time.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    15. Re:Yet another music service? by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      tehy will get people to buy them by not offering CDs, or by phasing in the modle I have stated.

      BTW, Phillips patant has little to say after it expires, and the RIAA can just call them Audio disks or Music disks, no one will know the diffrence from the packageing.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    16. Re:Yet another music service? by MoneyT · · Score: 1

      Erm, short of putting the files on a file sharing network or playing them on a player that doesn't support AAC, you can do everything you listed with the Apple tunes in their defualt format. Likewise, I'm quite sure someone is already working on a program that strips the protection from the AAC file to make it a non protected AAC file, and then you can do whatever you want with it.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    17. Re:Yet another music service? by MoneyT · · Score: 1

      But you can release a computer to put it on another computer. The 3 computer limit is simultanious play ability. You can actualy have the file on as many computers as you want, you just have to authenticate every time you use one other thant the 3 currently authenticated computers.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    18. Re:Yet another music service? by redJag · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, when I buy a car I fully expect to be able to drive it at 140MPH through my neighborhood. If the car can do it, and I bought the car, I should be able to do it.

      When I buy a rifle, I expect to be able to shoot signs, lights, perhaps annoying sales people. The gun is very capable of doing said things, it would be wrong not to let me.

      I bought a computer and I deserve the right to hack into online banks because I can do it, with this computer, that I bought..

      When I purchase music I should be able to burn as many copies as I want, give them to my friends, host the files on streaming radio and shoot people with my rifle while driving my car through their neighborhood and hacking their bank account with my laptop.

      If you took this post seriously, give me your credit card number so I can donate some money to your incredible genius.

    19. Re:Yet another music service? by Alsee · · Score: 0

      It's pretty darned reasonable in my eyes.

      The fact that DRM "generously" grants you some sub-set of fair use does not change the fact that it denies other fair use activities. They have absolutely no legal right to block you ANY fair use activity. That makes it unreasonable.

      The best thing about iTunes is that (as far as I've heard) you can always strip the DRM off by burning the track and ripping it clean. In other words they intentionally poked a hole in the DRM, they are just intentionally making it a hassle to uncripple the files. It is just plain stupid to intentionally inconvience your customers.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    20. Re:Yet another music service? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Burn it to CD, and then rip it into AAC, no problem. That's how you get around it

    21. Re:Yet another music service? by hanssprudel · · Score: 1

      It's draconian because a computer should obey it's user, not its vendor or media corporations.

      As has been said a million times: the nature of the restrictions don't matter. What matters is that your computer suddenly reserves the right to make them. Why is this so difficult to understand?

    22. Re:Yet another music service? by hanssprudel · · Score: 1

      When I buy a car, I fully expect that how fast I drive it is between me and my community (as represented by the police). If cars were designed to restrict how I could drive them, then I would be pissed as hell.

      When I buy a rifle, and I have a proper license for it, I expect that how I use it is between me and my community. If my contained electronics designed to restrict how I use it, I would be pissed (check how many gun owners are in favor of "smart guns" with even minimum restrictions).

      When I buy a computer, I expect that what software I can run, and how I can communicate with other computers on the Internet is between me and my community. If my computer was designed to restrict what programs I could run because some could be used to break into banks I would be pissed as hell.

      When I purchase music, I expect that the manner in which I can copy and distribute to be between me and my community. If my music service starts using my own computer against me to restrict what I can do with that music, I will be pissed as hell.

      DRM is not like having laws. DRM places everyone in a cage, and provides prior restraint against breaking the law.

      I think it is your incredible genius that needs help.

    23. Re:Yet another music service? by kyrre · · Score: 1

      But you can of course burn Apples aac files to cd-audio. And if you then rip the cd back to mp3 you can copy them as well. It will probably work for you. Seems like your friends don't care much for sound quality anyway. (LP -> tape).

    24. Re:Yet another music service? by shotfeel · · Score: 1

      "I can wait a few months and get the CD for 5 or 6 bucks. "

      So do that. Nobody is stopping you. Other people feel that paying even that much if all they want is one song is too much.

      And could you enlighten me as to what exactly you wanted to do with your music from the iTunes Music Store that you couldn't do? AFAIK everything you mentioned can be done with them: burning to CD, transfering to more than one computer and player...

    25. Re:Yet another music service? by shotfeel · · Score: 1

      "Why would I buy Apple's music when I can buy a CD that I can use however I want?"

      Because you can't buy a CD that you can use however you want, at least not legally.

      As I asked above, what exactly are you wanting to do that you can't do with the music from Apple? I just can't think of anything that's legal, but then I'm not known for my imagination.

    26. Re:Yet another music service? by cappadocius · · Score: 1

      Quite true. But what I am talking about is the fact that a Hard Drive issue can (and certain System Installs will) remove the key without releasing it. The key diappears into the ether and then you are down to only two keys. If you are having any recurrent computer problems you either have to live without your AACs or else risk loosing all the keys to system problems.

      --

      omnia tua castra sunt nobis

    27. Re:Yet another music service? by redJag · · Score: 1

      apparently you took the post seriously :) lol

  5. Just wondering... by Smelly+Jeffrey · · Score: 2, Funny

    will we be able to sell these new Dell DJ songs on ebay?

  6. This sounds what the industry needs by Amiga+Lover · · Score: 1, Troll

    And something they've been loathe to implement until now. Not only the concept of selling music by a company NOT traditionally involved in the music biz, but expanding that to an integrated system for taking it with you. The old way of buying a CD, taking it with you on a walkman and risking damage, clutter and scratches to the CD is something I don't want to put up with any longer than I have to. I've used a Sony MP3 player for 8 months and while that's a step in the right direction, it hadn't removed the entire concept of HAVING to sell a digital format (CD audio) on a physical medium

    Dell, you are brilliant. Running everything from the music downloads, to an integrated portable player for those, skipping the entire idea of reliance on a physical medium. I predict BIG things for this

    1. Re:This sounds what the industry needs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Apple did it first with IPod and ITunes... how does that make Dell so brilliant?

    2. Re:This sounds what the industry needs by ibmman85 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      yeah. its called the ipod. and most likely the ipod is better considering dell always has problems with build quality. and their support sucks beyond belief... apple's support has to be better than dell's.. i own mostly pc's so its not that im a mac freak (well i am but im equally divided) but yeah i just dont trust dell

    3. Re:This sounds what the industry needs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the ipod is better considering dell always has problems with build quality.

      Tell that to anyone who owns an iBook. There's a reason they're so cheap. I've never seen a product so shoddily put together. Powerbooks are nice, and it's certainly a case of You Get What You Pay For

      And don't get me started on eMacs. Ugh

    4. Re:This sounds what the industry needs by joeku · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Dell, you are brilliant. Running everything from the music downloads, to an integrated portable player for those, skipping the entire idea of reliance on a physical medium. I predict BIG things for this."

      cough...

    5. Re:This sounds what the industry needs by CrackHappy · · Score: 1

      I don't really want to get into a whole Dell vs. Apple / Support thing but personally, I've had nothing but excellent support from Dell. They were the only ones we could get to answer the phone when MsBlast started wreaking havoc.

      --
      1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d Capitalization really works: i helped my uncle jack off a horse
    6. Re:This sounds what the industry needs by realdpk · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      What makes it brilliant is that Dell is going to sell it to everyone, while Apple is selling iTunes to barely a handful of users. But as everyone pro-Apple will tell you, iTunes for Windows will be coming out really soon!!!

    7. Re:This sounds what the industry needs by LionMage · · Score: 1

      Funny, I've owned two iBooks, one of the original Tangerine models (the one that looked kind of like a toilet seat), and later, one of the newer 2001 models (with the white plastics). I only ever had to have my 2001 iBook repaired once, and that was because there was an issue with the plastics on the bottom of the unit. That was repaired for free under warranty, and I haven't had a problem since. (The problem may have been my fault, even; I turned the cam that holds the battery in place in the wrong direction, and it may have cracked the plastics holding the cam in place, but Apple repaired it without complaint.)

      I've always felt that the iBooks, while underpowered, were rugged laptops. Considering the abuse I put them through, I think they hold up very well.

      On the other hand, I've seen a lot of issues with the new 12" PowerBook, which is based on the iBook design. Go figure.

    8. Re:This sounds what the industry needs by commodoresloat · · Score: 2, Funny

      He said a company not traditionally involved in the music business. And we all know that Apple has been in the music business ever since they were distributing Beatles records.

    9. Re:This sounds what the industry needs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What makes it brilliant is that Dell is going to sell it to everyone, while Apple is selling iTunes to barely a handful of users.

      And yet, somehow, by selling iTunes to "barely a handful of users," Apple has still managed in less than a year to sell 10,000,000 songs. In less than two months of service, iMusic had sold more songs online than all the other online music retailers COMBINED.

      If or when iMusic goes Windows, it'll be like nothing we've ever seen before.

    10. Re:This sounds what the industry needs by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

      Which iBook are you talking about? My experience with two (one white one and a yellow "purse" design) is quite the opposite -- these things manage to be both elegant and rugged.

    11. Re:This sounds what the industry needs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " Apple did it first with IPod and ITunes... how does that make Dell so brilliant?"

      from the article: "at a better value than they're currently getting."

      Basically, Dell will provide the same solution at a lot lower cost, which is what pc users expect. That is what Dell is good at, cutting costs.

  7. Good Business Example. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The question is why not? The demand for downloadable music is high. The RIAA cant sue you and if a pay-service springs up that is actually good and not loaded with DRM and limits, it may succeed. Well see if this becomes a nightmare, or
    an "everybody wins" situation.

  8. the sexy factor by sl0ppy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    apple has a history of being "sexy".

    dell has a history of being "boxy".

    somehow, i see their image working against them here.

    1. Re:the sexy factor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      maybe Dell and Apple could team up and create a sexy box. How old is that pothead switcher girl again?

    2. Re:the sexy factor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, in this neck of the woods, Apple is "gay" and Dell is, um, "workhorse-ish."

      Most people I know would not be caught dead with an iPod. There is definitely a niche that the Dell product and service will fill.

    3. Re:the sexy factor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My sympathies that fashion-sense cripples like you and your friends will die childless and alone.

  9. Another "Apple is our R&D dept." idea. by General+Sherman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't know how many times people have seen this, but if it's ANYTHING like other PC companies that have tried to copy apple, they're usually quite terrible (such as www.buymusic.com).

    I highly doubt that this will have any effect, if any, on the iPod.

    --
    - Sherman
    1. Re:Another "Apple is our R&D dept." idea. by FosterKanig · · Score: 3, Insightful

      My worry is that is going to be one of those things that they throw in with the purchase of a computer, therefore the people won't need/want to buy an iPod. Thus eliminating sales.

      Side note: Some people at work were talking about buying a computer and Dell kept coming up, and then they would bad mouth Dell about their service. But they still bought from Dell because there wasn't and easier/cheaper alternative. Idiots.

    2. Re:Another "Apple is our R&D dept." idea. by piznut · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Dell is being smart, they are letting Apple basically test the market for them.

      I think Apple's original strategy with iTMS was to create a cool premium service that you coudld get only by buying a Mac...then later launch it for windows in order to capitalize on the whole market.

      Trouble is, the lag time waiting for the PC version of iTMS is so long that a smart competitor (Dell) has decided to step in and try to steal the hype.

      From a Houston Chronicle article:

      "Apple has said it will make the program available for the Windows operating system by the end of the year"

      It looks like there will be some interesting competition by the end of the year. That's never a bad thing for consumers as far as I can see.

    3. Re:Another "Apple is our R&D dept." idea. by Ancil · · Score: 2, Insightful
      PC companies that have tried to copy apple [are] usually quite terrible
      And they usually end up dominating in the end. Apple invariably tries to use its successful products (like iPod and iTunes) to sell its overpriced products (like computers).

      When iPod first came out it was amazing, but I never bought one because it wouldn't talk to my computer. Now iPods will work with PC's, but if you want the music service, it's Mac-only. Inevitably there will be a PC version of iTunes -- after it's too late and someone like Dell has locked up a 90% market share.

      It seems to be inherent in the Apple culture. The same shit happenned with FireWire. Apple had this hot technology over ten years ago, and their first instinct is to lock it up and not sell it to anyone except "Apple people". Years later, USB comes along and people say it's inferior technology. Maybe, but it's inferior technology you could actually buy.

      Seriously, why not let Apple do the R&D work? Once they finish, they let you take over the market.
    4. Re:Another "Apple is our R&D dept." idea. by TedTschopp · · Score: 1

      Why do you keep thinking that there is an advantage to being first to market. Microsoft should have cured you of that falacy looong ago. Ted

      --
      Fantasy remains a human right; we make in our measure and in our derivative mode... -- JRR Tolkien
    5. Re:Another "Apple is our R&D dept." idea. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eh, what? Apple computers were the first desktop pcs to ship with USB across the line. Then Dell, et. al. decided it might be a good idea.

    6. Re:Another "Apple is our R&D dept." idea. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > ANYTHING like other PC companies that have tried to copy apple

      Apple did not invent the iPod's tiny hard drive -- they just bought up the entire supply to give themselves a 1 year advantage on the market.

      (The drive was specifically invented for portable devices, and once you have the drive, the rest of the iPod's form factor is obvious.)

    7. Re:Another "Apple is our R&D dept." idea. by daviddennis · · Score: 1

      What I noticed right away is that it looks almost identical to the iPod, down to the font of the display.

      I wonder if this is designed and manufacturered by the same people who did the iPod?

      The controls don't look as well thought out as the iPod, but otherwise it's quite the ripoff.

      D

    8. Re:Another "Apple is our R&D dept." idea. by homer_ca · · Score: 1

      Apple did NOT invent the hard disk portable music player. The Creative Nomad Jukebox was the first mass market one available. It was the size of a CD discman and had its quirks. Later Archos and Sonicblue (Rio) made them too.

      However, the Ipod IS the best executed design we have yet. In a portable mp3 player, storage is everything. The Creative and Archos were limited by their 2.5" laptop hard drive which saddled them with a big and clunky form factor. Apple scored a coup by getting a good supply of those Toshiba PCMCIA hard drives which allowed them to design to a much smaller form factor. When they first came out, retail price for just the bare drives cost almost as much as the same size Ipod. Now that supply is getting better for those PCMCIA hard drives, I predict a lot more competition for the Ipod.

    9. Re:Another "Apple is our R&D dept." idea. by LionMage · · Score: 5, Interesting
      In a recent Newsweek article, Apple let slip that iTunes for Windows has been moved up, apparently because development has progressed faster than expected. They're citing an October release, now, less than a month away:
      And Apple, NEWSWEEK learned, quietly informed some music insiders that it's moved up the date for expanding its current Mac-only iTunes for the vast universe of Windows-based PCs to mid-October. Apple couldn't be reached for comment.
    10. Re:Another "Apple is our R&D dept." idea. by GlassHeart · · Score: 1
      When iPod first came out it was amazing, but I never bought one because it wouldn't talk to my computer. Now iPods will work with PC's, but if you want the music service, it's Mac-only.

      Technically, you're lying. As you point out, the new iPods now work with your PC (not to mention much more capacity), but you still haven't bought one. This means that "it wouldn't talk to my computer" is not the only reason you don't have one right now. You should cite these reasons, so we can tell if you'll ever buy an iPod at all.

      In fact, it sounds like you want an equivalent level of service as an Apple customer of both iPods and Macs. That may never happen for you. Apple is likely to let PC-based services lag Mac-based services.

      Inevitably there will be a PC version of iTunes -- after it's too late and someone like Dell has locked up a 90% market share

      What we know as fact is that the success of an on-line music store depends heavily on a few factors:

      • Price
      • Size of catalog
      • DRM restrictions
      • Micropayments
      Dell has not announced any information regarding these crucial points, and you can already decide who will win? Nevermind that all Apple is missing is PC client software (which consists of re-implementing the proven iTunes UI and design), and their experience running their music store for several months?
    11. Re:Another "Apple is our R&D dept." idea. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm pretty sure the Compaq/Hango PJB100 predates the Nomad Jukebox. At least that's the way I remember it - I had a PJB100 for months when the Nomad came out as a new product. In fact, I still have that PJB100 and it actually still works. It still has some features that newer players haven't matched (most noticeably the ability to preserve the seamless nature of CDs which are mastered without silence between the tracks - like mix CDs and whatnot.)

      The iPod is pretty sweat though - one of these days I will upgrade.

    12. Re:Another "Apple is our R&D dept." idea. by Ancil · · Score: 1
      Technically, you're lying.
      When iPods first came out, I would have bought one if it were an option. They were certainly a lot better than anything else on the market. Not owning a Mac, I bought a Compaq MP3 player as a "holdover", until the PC-compatible hardware got better. Lost sales for Apple: 1.

      Fast forward to the present. I'm tired of my 64 meg flash-based player, but my expectations are higher now. Everyone knows pay-for-music services are coming, but there aren't any available to me. So I'm still waiting.
      This means that "it wouldn't talk to my computer" is not the only reason you don't have one right now.
      I never said it was. I said it's why I didn't buy one when they first came out. My expectations have raised over the past couple years, and Apple still isn't there to meet those expectations. Maybe Apple will even release iTunes for PC, and I'll buy it. Or maybe not. Apparently, Apple thinks it's a good idea to let Dell et al catch up and give them competition. If Apple were smart, they would have written a Windows client for iTunes first, and worried about niche markets (Apples, Linux, etc) later.

      By all means, please reply, and explain how this makes me a "liar", or appologize for calling me one.
    13. Re:Another "Apple is our R&D dept." idea. by GlassHeart · · Score: 1
      explain how this makes me a "liar", or appologize for calling me one.

      That's why I wrote "technically". Here's your original quote:

      When iPod first came out it was amazing, but I never bought one because it wouldn't talk to my computer.

      According to your reply, you didn't buy one initially because it wouldn't work with PCs. You didn't buy one later, because:

      I'm tired of my 64 meg flash-based player, but my expectations are higher now.

      which means you never bought an iPod because of at least two reasons. That's why I wrote "technically, you're lying". This distinction is important to understanding why you never bought an iPod, which forms the core of your criticisms against Apple.

      I said it's why I didn't buy one when they first came out.

      Read it again. You wrote that PC compatibility was why you never bought one. It may not be what you meant, but it's what you wrote. I can't apologize for not reading minds.

      Everyone knows pay-for-music services are coming, but there aren't any available to me.

      The iPod works with PCs right now, and Apple has announced iTunes for PCs, due out in a month or two. It's not exactly vaporware (given Apple's reputation, the lack of technical barriers, and the obvious business benefit), so I'm guessing there are reasons you still haven't listed yet. You certainly seem willing to give Dell (which has, I reiterate, issued absolutely zero details with just over two months left before actual launch) the benefit of the doubt, assuming they will grab "90% of the market".

      If Apple were smart, they would have written a Windows client for iTunes first, and worried about niche markets (Apples, Linux, etc) later.

      Why would people buy Macs, then, if even Apple's own services don't work with Macs?

    14. Re:Another "Apple is our R&D dept." idea. by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      what expectations do you have that keep you from buying an iPod?

      it plays MP3s like everything else, and has a great design and interface.

      you aren't buying an iPod because of no iTunes?

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    15. Re:Another "Apple is our R&D dept." idea. by Ancil · · Score: 1
      what expectations do you have that keep you from buying an iPod?

      ..you aren't buying an iPod because of no iTunes?
      That's what I said, and it's what I meant. Everyone knows the music publishers are slowly getting their heads out of their asses, and buying songs over the internet is coming. I want my next player to have that capability. The capability doesn't exist for PC's yet, so I'm still watching and waiting and limping along with my Compaq player.
    16. Re:Another "Apple is our R&D dept." idea. by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      you can buy the iPod and use MusicMatch Jukebox to manage your music.

      that is how it is done on windows.

      in october, iTunes for windows comes out. Apple IS coming out with it for windows, an iPod IS a good buy.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    17. Re:Another "Apple is our R&D dept." idea. by Ancil · · Score: 1
      which means you never bought an iPod because of at least two reasons. That's why I wrote "technically, you're lying".
      Ok, that explanation is so blockheaded I'm just going to drop it. Calling me a "liar" was way out of line.
      Why would people buy Macs, then..?
      Hell, man, I don't know why people buy Macs. Because money grows in their yard, instead of grass? Who cares why? I was talking about why I didn't buy an iPod, still haven't bought an iPod, and may never buy an iPod. And the fact is, I lusted after one when it was Mac-only. I lusted after iTunes, but now competitors are coming and iTunes still isn't out for PC's, and I'll "wait and see" which one is the best when the holidays come round.

      Apple "True Believers" seem to think the rest of the world resents them and their pretentious iconoclasm. It's strange to me; who would want to define themselves in terms of the products they buy? You think I was "lying" and never wanted to buy an iPod, or whatever. How ridiculous. If Apple had offered the best cost/benefit position, I would have bought from them.

      You yourself are a great demonstration of this mindset. I post about why I didn't buy an iPod -- that's an MP3 player -- and you start talking about buying Macs -- those are computers. The two should have nothing to do with each other. I don't have to buy a GE dishwasher just becaue I store my food in a GE refrigerator, do I? If I could just buy the MP3 player and get a good music service, I would. I already have a computer; I don't want another.

      Back to my original point. Apple is stupid for tying its consumer products (which I want) to it computers (which I don't want). Do they honestly think I'm going to buy a $1,000+ computer just to download songs and load them on my iPod? I could take that $1,000 and buy every song I ever wanted on a competing service, once it's available for the PC. The cost of an iPod for a PC user wasn't $300 or $400, it was more like $1.5K. Who would pay that? Now the situation is the same if you're shopping for an internet music service. iTunes would cost me a cool grand up-front, so I'm waiting for the alternative.

      Now Apple has put itself in the position of competing against Dell and others, when they could have locked up the internet music market months ago and the MP3 player market years ago. Was that smart?
    18. Re:Another "Apple is our R&D dept." idea. by MoneyT · · Score: 1

      Question:

      What prevents you from buying an iPod and using it with Dell's service AND with Apple's service?

      Answer: Nothing

      Question: Given that Apple is a compny whihc produces (amzingly enough) Apple Computers, where is the logic in them catering first to PC users and then to Mac users? Apple will always have it's loyal customers, but what loyalty do PC people give Apple?

      Answer: None

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    19. Re:Another "Apple is our R&D dept." idea. by Ancil · · Score: 1
      Question: What prevents you from buying an iPod and using it with Dell's service AND with Apple's service?
      Ummm, are you on crack or someting? Apple's service isn't available on the PC, that's the whole f*cking problem.

      "Nothing" prevents me, except that neither service actually exists just yet.
      where is the logic in them catering first to PC users and then to Mac users
      Let's see, there are about ten times as many PC users? Heck, if Apple isn't interested in market share, why not release it on BeOS first? I think there's still 20 or 30 people running that OS.

      Ignoring all these "Apple versus The World" responses, the original post was complaining about people "copying" Apple's stuff for the PC world. And my point hasn't changed: If Apple isn't going to sell music hardware and software to the PC world, someone else will step in and fill the gap pretty quickly. Why bitch about it? Apple certainly doesn't seem interested in being anything other than a niche player.
    20. Re:Another "Apple is our R&D dept." idea. by MoneyT · · Score: 1

      Ummm, are you on crack or someting? Apple's service isn't available on the PC, that's the whole f*cking problem

      But we know it will be very soon. And in the mean time there are services already availible on the PC which allow one to download legal music. So again, what is keeping you from buying the iPod now, and using it with the service when it is availible?

      Let's see, there are about ten times as many PC users? Heck, if Apple isn't interested in market share, why not release it on BeOS first? I think there's still 20 or 30 people running that OS.


      So Apple abondonning it's customers to serve a community that has no interest or loyalty to Apple is a good business practice? Under that logic, Red Hat should release it's software binaries for other linux distributions and for windows before their own software because the numbers are greater.

      Apple certainly doesn't seem interested in being anything other than a niche player

      No, not at all. Announcing at the release of the mac version of the product that a PC version is soon comming is showing no interest in other markets whatsoever.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    21. Re:Another "Apple is our R&D dept." idea. by Ancil · · Score: 1
      But we know it will be very soon.

      that a PC version is soon comming
      Money talks and bullshit walks. "Soon" doesn't mean jack. Hell, they released software to make the iPod work with PC's. By that time I had already bought a competing product. What the hell am I supposed to do with "soon"?
      So Apple abondonning it's customers to serve a community that has no interest or loyalty to Apple is a good business practice?
      I have to admit, I've never understood the idea of having "loyalty" to a company. Sounds like a way of talking yourself into otherwise bad purchasing decisions.

      As for having no "interest" in Apple, I have had loads of interest in Apple on-and-off, over the years. Apple has never shown any "interest" in having me as a customer, though. Every time I thought I might like one of their products, they managed to come up with a deal-breaker. "Want our cool music player? You have to buy our computer and OS too!". Ummm, how about no?

      The only customers Apple "abandoned" are the ones like me, who like Apple's personal music products but don't want their computers. They abandoned all those potential customers to Dell, Compaq, Diamond, etc.. And no, that was not a "good business practice".
    22. Re:Another "Apple is our R&D dept." idea. by MoneyT · · Score: 1

      Money talks and bullshit walks. "Soon" doesn't mean jack

      no but "End of the year" means end of the year. You're just looking for an excuse not to buy the iPod. You have yet to explain what prevents you from buying the iPod now to suit your current needs and using it with the PC services and the mac service at the end of the year.

      I have to admit, I've never understood the idea of having "loyalty" to a company. Sounds like a way of talking yourself into otherwise bad purchasing decisions.

      Loyalty to a company, the idea that you are willing to stick with a company even through bad decisions because you like their products. See ford and chevy owners, see Dell fanboys. A company with a loyal customer base is a company that has a much greater ability to experiment with new ideas. They know that they will not loose most of their customer base if they screw up once, and as such they can take risks (see Newton, G4 Cube, etc). Companies with loyal customers can often give those customers benefits that they would otherwise not give (see frequent flyer miles, return customer rebates, and products before anyone else gets them)

      The only customers Apple "abandoned" are the ones like me, who like Apple's personal music products but don't want their computers

      The PC version of the iPod was out roughly 2 or 3 months after the mac version. Since then, you have never had to buy a mac or the OS to use an iPod. To use iTunes, yes, but iTunes is software. You could still buy and use an iPod today and it would work happily with everything else, but you want more. You want them to make their software for you too. And you want it yesterday. Well sorry, but the world doesn't work like that.

      I'm sorry that you have to wait 9 whole months to get some software so that you can finaly justify purchasing an MP3 player.

      Really though it boils down to this. You have never bought a product from Apple. Being a windows user, you are likely to not buy a product from Apple. Untill you become an Apple customer, you are an afterthought. Just like I'm sure dell never even thought of making a mac compatible MP3 player.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    23. Re:Another "Apple is our R&D dept." idea. by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 1
      I think Apple's original strategy with iTMS was to create a cool premium service that you coudld get only by buying a Mac...then later launch it for windows in order to capitalize on the whole market.

      And if Apple had used the FLAC format or some other lossless format unencumbered by DRM baggage they would've been even more successful. As a Mac user I've NEVER visited the iTMS and have no intention of every buying anything through there. If I want crappy lossy recorded tracks I'll download them from a P2P network. If I want to actually BUY a track then I'm going to get the perfect CD quality version at the store.

    24. Re:Another "Apple is our R&D dept." idea. by shekel · · Score: 1
      ...they're usually quite terrible (such as www.buymusic.com).

      Shouldn't be a problem avoiding that one...


      Thank you for visiting BuyMusic.com.

      In order to take full advantage of BuyMusic.com's offerings you must be on a Windows Operating System using Internet Explorer version 5.0 or higher.

    25. Re:Another "Apple is our R&D dept." idea. by Ancil · · Score: 1
      Really though it boils down to this. You have never bought a product from Apple. Being a windows user, you are likely to not buy a product from Apple.
      No, I'm not likely to buy a computer from Apple. If Apple didn't try to "link" its consumer products to its computers, I would already own a product from Apple. Apple users often see the rest of the world as "anti-Apple", but that's just their bizarre fantasy world.
      Until you become an Apple customer, you are an afterthought.
      Again, what a ridiculous way to see the world. People like me certainly have been afterthoughts to Apple, and that's why we aren't Apple customers. That's how it works; a company has to come up with the product first, then they get the customers.
    26. Re:Another "Apple is our R&D dept." idea. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You still haven't explained then why it is that now that Apple has a product (iPod) that is not dependant on their computers, why you still haven't bought one. Like the other guy said, you're just looking for excuses to whine.

    27. Re:Another "Apple is our R&D dept." idea. by MoneyT · · Score: 1

      No, I'm not likely to buy a computer from Apple. If Apple didn't try to "link" its consumer products to its computers, I would already own a product from Apple.

      The iPod is NOT LINKED TO APPLE HARDWARE.

      Why don't you own one?

      Again, what a ridiculous way to see the world.

      Not really, Apple is an established company with a consumer base. All of their products are going to cater first towards their existing customers and then towards potential customers. Just like IBM caters it's products to IBM users, and Dell caters it's products to Dell users.

      People like me certainly have been afterthoughts to Apple, and that's why we aren't Apple customers.

      And now that Apple has produced a product for you, you haven't bought it because......

      That's how it works; a company has to come up with the product first, then they get the customers

      They do have a product. And they have also given you an idea of what you can expect in the future from said product. You haven't bought it, despite Apple having made it. Why should Apple listen to you about how to conduct their business. They gave you what you wanted, and then you changed the rules.

      You're exactly like the people that said that they would buy music if it was sold online at a cheap price and if you could mix and match the songs, and then refuse to use iTMS because it has non-invasive DRM. You don't want a solution, you just want to bitch.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
  10. dell by ibmman85 · · Score: 1

    I've never really liked dell at all and still dont.. although i have to say the axim is probably their best product.. for the price its amazing (especially compared to my ipaq 3630)

  11. Picture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    There's a picture of the new music player, together with the bundled speakers here. Very nice styling :) Looks like they've combined Apple's iPod with Apple's G5 PowerMac in design terms.

    1. Re:Picture by shking · · Score: 1
      Looks like they've combined Apple's iPod with Apple's G5 PowerMac in design terms

      It looks like old luggage to me

      --
      -- "At Microsoft, quality is job 1.1" -- PC Magazine, Nov. 1994
  12. i bet it was the interns by obsid1an · · Score: 5, Funny

    You know it was the interns that thought this idea up.

  13. meanwhile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    CmdrTaco announced he has a new herpes blister. He expects to begin sharing it by the end of tonight.

  14. Apple blew this one... by Skyshadow · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I can understand why Apple decided to release their service as a Mac-only affair for the first couple of months, but I absolutely can't agree with it.

    Apple's stockholders should be storming Infinite Loop right now with pitchforks and torches -- in excluding Windows users, they went out and squandered the sort of lead (time-to-market wise) that CEOs have wet dreams about. And do you think they sold any more Macs than they would have otherwise? I doubt it...

    All in all, I think Dell is in a great position on this one *assuming* that Microsoft doesn't get away with another violation of antitrust law ("You must include a desktop link to our music software or we won't sell you any copies of Windows").

    I wonder what Dell will become if they escape from being Just Another Wintel vendor...

    --
    Every year during my review, I just pray the words "slashdot.org" aren't mentioned.
    1. Re:Apple blew this one... by damieng · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This wasn't a case of Apple *excluding* Windows.

      If you've ever used the iTunes music store you'll know it's completely integrated with their iTunes software.

      Which is Mac only.

      And takes time to rewrite for Windows.

      --
      [)amien
    2. Re:Apple blew this one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      EARLIER this year, Dell changed their name from Dell Computer to Dell. Theyve branched out in the last couple years... printers, cameras, mp3 players... more of a package deal than just an overpriced box.

    3. Re:Apple blew this one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      iTunes for Windows and the iTMS for Windows along with it, will be out October 19th

    4. Re:Apple blew this one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple's stockholders should be storming Infinite Loop right now with pitchforks and torches -- in excluding Windows users
      Calm down, cowboy! The windows version of the iTunes Music Store is due by the end of year 2003. And this aint gonna be no Duke Nukem Forever ;-)

      And do you think they sold any more Macs than they would have otherwise? I doubt it...
      They did. Guaranteed. Plus, they please their current customers ("we Mac users get cool technology first"), this is good marketing.

    5. Re:Apple blew this one... by goat_attack · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Apple's working on a PC version of iTunes as we speak. It should be out in October I believe.

      A simultanious PC release of the iTunes Store probably would have led to widespread problems. (BuyMusic.com anyone?) And it would be tough to recover from the PR fallout of a disasterious launch. Better to do it right first, than fix it later (if only more companies worked this way...)

    6. Re:Apple blew this one... by Blondie-Wan · · Score: 1

      Hey, where'd you get the date? All I'd heard was "before the end of the year"...

    7. Re:Apple blew this one... by cosmo7 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I wonder what Dell will become if they escape from being Just Another Wintel vendor...

      Dell isn't just a Wintel vendor, it's the vendor. Dell has the biggest slice of the market and is the only company besides Apple actually making money from selling consumer PCs.

      So with this huge market share, what R&D has Dell contributed to the world? Absolutely nothing, except for their one invention: a tech support button on their machines which never worked properly and they longer support. Every single aspect of Dell's business is copied from other manufacturers. There is absolutely no innovation going on there.

    8. Re:Apple blew this one... by Skyshadow · · Score: 1
      iTunes was launched in, what, the middle of May?

      Even if they were to release the PC client today, that's a *four month* chunk of time where they could have been all alone in the market for everybody (instead of all alone in the market for, what, 5% of the population).

      The value of that time just cannot be overstated. Look at eBay: there's nothing difficult about what they do, it's not (relatively) hard to replicate. But who goes to Amazon or other places for auctions? Almost nobody (again, relatively). Why? Mindshare.

      I know "mindshare" stil suffers from the idiotic devotion to it that was around in '99-2000, but it's still very valid. By now, millions of Windows users should have had good experiences using iTunes, but they don't. Now, Apple has to compete against a company that's going to put their service's icon on the desktop of every computer they sell (which is quite a few).

      Look, I like Apple. I think they do great things and make terrific innovations. That's why I hate seeing them blow it like this time and time again... I'm starting to think that one of the Xerox PARC folks must have put a Voodoo curse on them after they "appropriated" the GUI so that they'd be doomed to have the same thing happen to them over and over again....

      --
      Every year during my review, I just pray the words "slashdot.org" aren't mentioned.
    9. Re:Apple blew this one... by Blondie-Wan · · Score: 1

      Nobody wants iTunes and the iTMS available for Windows more than Apple does. Unfortunately, it's not simply a matter of porting and releasing the software; Apple has to renegotiate with the record labels to allow it to sell music to Windows users. Part of the reason Apple was able to coax such relatively lenient terms out of the labels in its agreements was that it would be selling only to Mac users at first; the labels viewed it as an experiment that could be expanded to the greater audience if it were successful, and if it weren't, it wouldn't be too great a loss since it just affected the Mac's tiny sliver of the market. The initial set of terms therefore permits Apple to sell only to Mac users; since the iTMS opened Apple has been negotiating with the labels to get rights to sell tunes to Windows folks.

    10. Re:Apple blew this one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've always heard iTunes for Windows was shooting for a planned January release.

    11. Re:Apple blew this one... by enigma48 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I was speaking with my dad about this the other day and realized one small intangible benefit Apple has going for it.

      Before 2000, there were several reasons why "you need a Windows PC" to do/use something. There were very few (I still can't think of any) reasons why you needed a Mac and couldn't use Windows. (I guess a few Mac-exclusive games, some software, but very little mainstream stuff).

      Now, want an iPod? Mac only (out-of-the-box retail experience). Want to try out iTMS? Mac only. Windows support 'coming soon'.

      I doubt Apple bet its profitability on the idea that once they get a few "Mac only" tasks, they would win. But it was one of the many intangible benefits of their decision.

      If Apple began making everything Windows-centric first, they've just announced "Hey, Mac products aren't the way to profit" - which would definately affect their bottom line. Selling products/services windows-first might make them a few quick bucks on iPod/iTMS sales but they would be marking their computers with a big X. Don't underestimate the power of consumer opinion on purchases. ("hey, Sara's Apple computer is easy to use and can get all kinds of music...")

      I'm still not sure if I would have made the choice they did but I also would have skipped over a lot of the intangible benefits.

    12. Re:Apple blew this one... by ocelotbob · · Score: 1

      It also take many, many months to negotiate with record company execs for such an ambitious project. Time that could have been spent getting a development team together and writing the windows software.

      --

      Marxism is the opiate of dumbasses

    13. Re:Apple blew this one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      iTunes was launched in, what, the middle of May?

      iTunes has been around for years and years. It's already up to version 4.

      But wait... are you talking about the iTunes Music Store? February.

      Even if they were to release the PC client today, that's a *four month* chunk of time where they could have been all alone in the market for everybody (instead of all alone in the market for, what, 5% of the population).

      Whose asshole should they have pulled the "PC client" out of? Or are you somehow unaware that writing and testing Windows software takes beaucoup time?

      There's a giant point that idiots like yourself seem to be missing: Apple is profitable. They're the most consistently profitable computer company in THE ENTIRE WORLD. Something like twenty out of twenty-two profitable quarters in the last 5-1/2 years. Market share DOES NOT MATTER. Period. By the only objective metric, the only metric that actually matters, they're a wild success. They haven't blown shit, and I'm getting pretty fucking tired of you armchair analysts trying to claim that they have.

    14. Re:Apple blew this one... by bnenning · · Score: 1
      That's why I hate seeing them blow it like this


      How did they blow it? It obviously takes them far less time to get iTMS up and running on Mac OS X than Windows. Would you prefer they delayed releasing the Mac version until the Windows version was ready?

      --
      How to solve most of our problems: 1.Lots of nuclear plants. 2.Cure aging.
    15. Re:Apple blew this one... by Ancil · · Score: 1

      Then they should have written a Windows version first, and worried about small niche markets like Macs once they had a big market share.

    16. Re:Apple blew this one... by BandwidthHog · · Score: 1

      But look how much pent up demand they've generated. Everybody's bitching that iTMS isn't available for Windows yet. That implies to me that it's already got the mindshare.

      --

      Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?
    17. Re:Apple blew this one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Windows version of iTunes is expected anytime from next Monday through the end of next month. Windows iPods have been on sale for more than a year. I do not see any lead squandered, as Dell is on the drawing board still. Apple has already penetrated the music-buying market, with the first successful implementation on the Internet.

    18. Re:Apple blew this one... by Josuah · · Score: 1

      I can understand why Apple decided to release their service as a Mac-only affair for the first couple of months, but I absolutely can't agree with it.

      No one else seems to have mentioned this in the other replies, but Steve Jobs has publicly stated that you're not going to make a ton of money off the sale of music (at least at this point) because the 66% cut given to the labels makes the profit margin very small given the people and infrastructure required to run the operation. But yes, the tons of money might be possible given economies of scale once you move into the Windows market. The argument as to why this didn't happen has been made by other people regarding iTunes for Mac OS only.

      The other important point is that Apple is currently using the iTunes Music Store to dramatically boost sales of their iPods. Also something Steve Jobs has publicly stated. Sales of iPods did indeed increase dramatically after the iTunes Music Store launch. So in addition to building the infrastructure, business model, and systems which would let them eventually move from a small scale operation to a large scale operation (i.e. testing small before going big) and make money at that point, they are using the store to make money now, but through iPod sales.

    19. Re:Apple blew this one... by Blondie-Wan · · Score: 1
      The same day Apple announced and rolled out the iTunes Music Store, it said it planned to offer it to Windows users before the end of the year.

      If you read of a "planned January release," you might be thinking of when the iTMS opens up to other parts of the world (right now it's US-only). When Apple can actually let people outside the US buy tunes from them depends on how quickly/smoothly the legal and rights issues concerning the music go, rather than on any technological issues, so I don't think they have a definite timetable for it yet (though obviously the sooner the better), but estimates I've seen do generally tend to put it around early next year.

    20. Re:Apple blew this one... by trenton · · Score: 1
      I can understand why Apple decided to release their service as a Mac-only affair for the first couple of months...

      I can't. Why didn't they do the Windows version first? Apple has, as others noticed, left the market wide open to someone doing exactly what Dell is doing: the iPod for Windows. Had Apple started with Windows, they'd have that market. Even if someone went into the Mac market while Apple was still developing their product, they'd certainly switch to the Apple offering the moment it was availalble.

      The same cannot be said for switching off Dell's service once the iTunes for Windows is availalble. I think Apple screwed up once again.

      --
      Too big to fail? Does that make me to small to succeed?
    21. Re:Apple blew this one... by vought · · Score: 1
      The value of that time just cannot be overstated. Look at eBay: there's nothing difficult about what they do, it's not (relatively) hard to replicate. But who goes to Amazon or other places for auctions? Almost nobody (again, relatively). Why? Mindshare.

      What would you have had them do? Delay a product (Mac iTMS and Itunes4) that was ready to make them money back form their investment? That would have been irresponsible in the face of Apple's shareholders and dangerous to Apple as a company.

      Adding more members to the development team to hurry a product isn't like Apple either; they do most things so well because small close-knit teams focus on goals, rather than bringing on more and more brute force in order to shave a few days off a schedule.

      Apple will produce the Windows version as soon as possible; they had a complete product for the Mac four months ago, so it was prudent that they release it and start recouping the investment as soon as possible. It's probable that Apple doesn't accelerate development of WiniTMS and WiniTunes by brute force because that isn't how they do things; they know it isn't a wise use of development resources.

    22. Re:Apple blew this one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All of Dell's innovations have been process improvement and channel related. They are darn good at squeezing pennies out of vendors.

      Dell is the technology Wallmart. Wally World has been doing pretty well here lately...

    23. Re:Apple blew this one... by MoneyT · · Score: 1

      Why would Apple turn it's back on it's customers to serve people who have no loyalty to Apple?

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    24. Re:Apple blew this one... by MoneyT · · Score: 1

      It's called customer loyalty. You loose a lot of customers when you ignore them.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    25. Re:Apple blew this one... by mesach · · Score: 1

      Well, if its Mac only and seeing is how I don't own one then I most likely haven't used iTunes music store to know its completely integrated with their iTunes Software...

      --
      moo.
  15. Strategic move by indros13 · · Score: 1
    This is good for Dell and PC users. For Dell, it's a consumer product that can be sold at a higher margin than many PCs are garnering these days. Additionally, it represents a pseudo-"killer app" that will give people a reason to buy a computer. Plus, it's just one more wise move on the part of PC makers to emulate iTunes as one of the few legitimate digital music services.

    For PC users, it means we can have an iPod-clone that interfaces with our machines. Yay for copies!

    --
    Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
    1. Re:Strategic move by Strudelkugel · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Some time ago I was talking to a Dell rep about a "media PC" that would be delivered with a drive filled with tracks. The customer might pay $1000 more for a huge music library on such a mahine. He said they looked into the idea, but the time it took to load the drives would have cost too much in production time.

      Offering their own player allows them to use the razors/blades model. I would guess they will sell the player for a fairly low cost, certainly less than the iPod, then make a decent profit on the music service. To the extent that Dell is getting into consumer services, it is something new. But, they are also following a very old and establshed model, which is something they are good at. The key is the oppressiveness of their DRM model. If they are as flexible as Apple, then Profit!!!. If not, then I'll have my doubts.

      --
      Imagine how much harder physics would be if electrons had feelings! -Feynman, maybe
  16. Dell copies Apple AGAIN by Phroggy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Any details on how the music download service will work? Subscription with free downloads but strict DRM, subscription with paid downloads and no/light DRM, paid downloads with no subscription but strict DRM, paid downloads with no subscription and no/light DRM?

    Pricing of the Dell Digital Jukebox? Less than $299? I hope so, considering how cheap it looks (compare cheap buttons and scroll wheel vs touch-sensitive buttons and wheel with no moving parts).

    --
    $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
    $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    1. Re:Dell copies Apple AGAIN by realdpk · · Score: 1

      No, if Dell were to actually copy Apple, they'd charge 50% more for their products, they'd start building their own computer components in-house to be "leet", and then they'd release their music service to only 3-5% of the US computer market telling everyone else that they can join in later, "maybe", once they get around to writing the software for the non-Dell market.

    2. Re:Dell copies Apple AGAIN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least Dell made the fonts different.

    3. Re:Dell copies Apple AGAIN by dreadnougat · · Score: 1

      Oh, geez. Copying success. The bastards are trying to make money! Why are you angry about Apple having a competitor? Competition is a bad thing now?

    4. Re:Dell copies Apple AGAIN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I know. Geez. It's ridiculous how copied that looks. Dell would get kicked out of school if that were it's term paper -- for plagiarism. And, yet, it is a second-rate knock off. Those buttons will all break. The mechanical scroll wheel will stop working in under 90 days (I have the cell phone repair receipts to prove it). And it is a Dell-made peripheral. Have you tried their printers?

      Dell can make boxes and nice LCD monitors. That's it. For everything else, buy a third-party product from Dell. Because if it says Dell-made on it, it is going to break.

    5. Re:Dell copies Apple AGAIN by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      Oh, geez. Copying success. The bastards are trying to make money! Why are you angry about Apple having a competitor? Competition is a bad thing now?

      How did you infer that I'm angry about it? I think it's amusing, and competition helps force Apple to innovate faster.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    6. Re:Dell copies Apple AGAIN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you troll any more?

      50% extra for their products

      Do your own comparisons. It ain't 50%

      they'd start building their own computer components in-house

      eh? Apple designs it in-house... other people build it. They don't create processors... they use standard parts such as AMD chips in there Airports and pci slots, pcmcia... They do create better technology when they see fit(see floppy drive, firewire etc)

      they'd release their music service to only 3-5% of the US computer market

      Release it to their customers. Apple says... hey if you own a Mac... guess what you get this first. Thank god Apple respects its customers. Shame on you for saying that they shouldn't.

    7. Re:Dell copies Apple AGAIN by dreadnougat · · Score: 1

      Angry mac zealots on /.? Never! :) By which I mean, oops, confused you with another personality type :)

    8. Re:Dell copies Apple AGAIN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah like the angry Linux zealot.

  17. fyi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ipods can interface with wintels.

  18. Is Dell the new Microsoft? by weez75 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In the same way Microsoft decided they would try to be all things to all people, Dell appears to have its heart set on dominating all things electronic. An iPod wannabe, a flat-screen TV, and other home electronics? Microsoft once sold operating systems. Then came an office suite, servers, mice, games, ERP suites, and now a fabulous media center for the whole family.

    I'll stick to my iPod...

    --
    Of course we torture people, we need the information --Gen. Pinochet
    1. Re:Is Dell the new Microsoft? by tychorose · · Score: 1
      I don't think you can compare the two. Microsoft maintains its leadership by anti-competitive methods (ok, their lawyers' opinion notwithstanding) whereas Dell just does a good job at marketing.

      There is that nothing Dell that anyone can not do. They've just figured out the process so damn well! (hmm.... "well".... "Dell".. should i sign up as their new copywriter?)

    2. Re:Is Dell the new Microsoft? by jimbolaya · · Score: 1

      Dell does a good job at getting supply chain, distribution and manufacturing costs down, period. Before the consumer products, nothing they manufactured had any bit of "zing" worth marketing. They deliver an (arguably) quality product at the lowest cost, that's what gets them sales.

      This deviation from that strategy could help them grow their revenue, which would become increasingly difficult if they remained solely a PC maker, or it could jeopardize their bottom line as they spread themselves thinner. Time will tell.

      --

      There ain't no rules here; we're trying to accomplish something.

    3. Re:Is Dell the new Microsoft? by MoronGames · · Score: 1

      Actually, Microsoft first sold programming languages, then operating systems, office suites, etc.

      --
      hey!
  19. The way I see it... by Tuxedo+Jack · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Dell's going to try to cater to a business model rather than what the customers want, just like with their PCs.

    If they (or iTunes, better yet) went and put stuff from Gainax, Toei, Viz, and many, many other anime companies, they'd make a bleeding _fortune_ thanks to all the otaku out there.

    But if the service is anything like their computers... God help anyone who joins. I know from experience; I'm a technology administrator at a local primary school, and we're locked into Dell. >_

    Even worse is that we're stuck paying three grand for their crappy Latitude D600s and that sweet new 17-inch Toshiba's five hundred less - three hundred, counting the upgrade to XP Pro.

    --

    Striking fear in the authors of godawful fanfiction, I am here, appearing in darkness, Tuxedo Jack!
    1. Re:The way I see it... by CoolMoDee · · Score: 1

      I agree with everything except that 17inch toshiba being sweet. It looks like total crap compared to 17inch powerbook that it copied from. Not to mention how massive the thing is...

      --
      Jisho - A Japanese English German Russian French Dictionary for the rest of us.
    2. Re:The way I see it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they (or iTunes, better yet) went and put stuff from Gainax, Toei, Viz, and many, many other anime companies, they'd make a bleeding _fortune_ thanks to all the otaku out there.

      I had to google to find out what the fuck "otaku" is. Apparently it means "homebody" in Japanese. Why this idiot didn't feel the need to post IN FUCKING ENGLISH is beyond me.

      Besides that--as if it weren't sufficient--the fucking idiot seems to have missed out on the fact that "homebodies" don't HAVE bleeding fortunes. They are not a market.

    3. Re:The way I see it... by burns210 · · Score: 1

      speaking of selling anime, with the growing ammount of broadband, could the ITMS be moved the Apple DVD player, and create a movie download service? how small can we get a vhs(-ish) quality movie? 1 gig? i know dvd full size are 4.7 gigs or so, but what if they did vhs quality as a base, with dvd quality as an option(say, 8 bucks a movie for vhs quality, 10-12 for dvd?). Just a thought.

      maybe, apple would offer (similar to the picture able shipping feature) a dvd boxed set for if you still want to buy online, but don't want to download... along with maybe a bittorrent-like download system?

      Trying to keep the impulse buy coolness would be hard, but not totally impossible.

    4. Re:The way I see it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      If they (or iTunes, better yet) went and put stuff from Gainax, Toei, Viz, and many, many other anime companies, they'd make a bleeding _fortune_ thanks to all the otaku out there.

      Ha. ha. ha. You're fucking kidding me.

      Seriously, you have a really bad case of "I am the center of the market-itis". Next think you'll be telling me that NBC should drop friends and start showing tentacle rape in prime time. Get over yourself, you fucking twerp.

    5. Re:The way I see it... by Tuxedo+Jack · · Score: 1

      Otaku means fanboy, not homebody. Your literal translator must have slipped a sector somewhere.

      --

      Striking fear in the authors of godawful fanfiction, I am here, appearing in darkness, Tuxedo Jack!
    6. Re:The way I see it... by cens0r · · Score: 1

      Using MPEG-4 or DiVX you can get a DVD quality movie down to about 700MB

      --
      Jack Valenti and Orrin Hatch will be first up against the wall when the revolution comes.
  20. Lame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this

    is

    gay

    Why can't people steal from Apple properly?

  21. Secret messages by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder if secret messages are implanted into each song to make you want to buy another computer. ITunes, "Buy Apple Buy Apple". Dell DJ, "Buy Dell Buy Dell". I can see it now, someone downloads the latest 50cent, song: "Popping caps in your ass all day and night...", person listening: "I want pop a cap in, wait a minute, actually I want a new XPS system with a 19" flat panel."

  22. I want an mp3 player... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...like the Archos jukebox (20 gig USB 2.0 Drive) but with iPod's display and jog dial. Looks like dell may be moving in the right direction? Anyone got more details?

  23. For Macs? by dksun · · Score: 1

    Hmm...I wonder if this Dell DJ thingy will be Mac compatible?

    1. Re:For Macs? by localghost · · Score: 1

      If you can afford a Mac, then you can afford an iPod. As far as I can tell, only a complete idiot would choose this over an iPod. Dell sucks at design.

  24. Reputation is one thing... by Skyshadow · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Reputation is one thing, availability and mindshare is another.

    Apple squandered an insane amount of positive free press and a killer lead by initially releasing a "Mac Only" service. They could have gotten such a big headstart that people would think "Apple = Music" the same way they think "eBay = Auctions" -- that sort of mindshare is absolute *gold*.

    Anyhow, Apple has a history of being "sexy". Unfortunately, they also have a history of being "stupid", at least in regards to capitalizing on their innovative triumphs.

    --
    Every year during my review, I just pray the words "slashdot.org" aren't mentioned.
    1. Re:Reputation is one thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple squandered an insane amount of positive free press and a killer lead by initially releasing a "Mac Only" service.

      And yet, somehow, they managed to deliver 10,000,000 songs in less than 8 months. And mere weeks after they opened for business, they had sold more songs than all of their competitors COMBINED for the entire YEAR.

      Squandered, my ass. Apple's making money hand over fist. Hell, they're selling their iPods faster than they can make them!

    2. Re:Reputation is one thing... by avayre · · Score: 1

      >>They could have gotten such a big headstart that people would think "Apple = Music" the same way they think "eBay = Auctions"

      Heheheh, wasn't the thinking of "Apple = Music" what got them into trouble with Apple Corps. a few times?

    3. Re:Reputation is one thing... by Hagen · · Score: 1

      I don't believe the "Mac Only" aspect of the iTunes Music Store was a contractual one. I believe it was a technical one.

      When Apple released the Windows version of the iPod, they leveraged the MusicMatch application to work as the connection to the PC. But since the Music Store operates entirely through iTunes, MusicMatch doesn't cut it. Apple must be working on a full version of iTunes for Windows, and needed the extra time to make it work as well as the Mac version.

      But most of this we already knew or predicted. Apple said Windows support would be out at the end of the year when they introduced the service last June.

    4. Re:Reputation is one thing... by TheInternet · · Score: 1

      Apple squandered an insane amount of positive free press and a killer lead by initially releasing a "Mac Only" service

      The iTunes Music Store is not Apple's only product. I think they're looking at the big picture of what they want to do with technology, and deferring everything to the success of a digital music service isn't it.

      - Scott

      --
      Scott Stevenson
      Tree House Ideas
    5. Re:Reputation is one thing... by MasonMcD · · Score: 1

      Apple squandered an insane amount of positive free press and a killer lead by initially releasing a "Mac Only" service.

      Right. We all know how pissed off the record companies were that Apple was holding off on the Windows version of iTunes.

      "Dammit, Jobs! You're telling me you won't roll out a version for all these billion people at the same time? How can we know how well it works if we don't have a large sample size!"

      I think that was a negotiating plus for getting the blessing of the record companies, not some petty decision.

  25. Why? by SD-VI · · Score: 1

    Just how do they think they're going to sell this? Apple succeeded because Apple stuff is well-made and looks really cool. What the hell is Dell's angle, "The Dell DJ features levels of ugliness you've never seen before!"? Or, better yet, "Dude, you're getting a tacky iPod ripoff!"

    1. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Just how do they think they're going to sell this?

      Just a thought, but perhaps they will offer it for less money than the IPOD? Except for the real style-aware individuals, the average consumer will see a similar looking device that does the same things but for a fraction of the cost. Sounds like a good angle to me.

    2. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the angle is "no 50% markup just to have something that looks real pretty because it shows how l33t I am to own something that costs twice as much for similar functions".

      The ipod does look better, and I'm betting it will functionally be better (except the dell allows recording). Of course, what if the Dell had better codecs (spare me the AAC speech - Ogg and FLAC are both much better)? Of course, they won't - they are rapidly and sadly moving towards a WinTelDell world. They'll have MP3 and sorry ass WMP - which is worse than AAC.

      Bottom line is - this Dell will probably be 200 bucks for a 15 or 20 GB hard drive. They may come close to 100 for a 10GB model, 150 tops. That is a very simple marketing argument to make - 1/2 the price for 90% of the functionality. That's why there are lots and lots of cars out there that are not top of the line.

  26. Re:fuck dell! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Informative? Sheesh...

    In other news, Apple sucks my chocolate salty balls.

    How's that for infomative you stupid mods you!!

  27. Special deals. by Asterax · · Score: 1

    "Get a Mazda Tribute and recieve a free Dell DJ." That sounds reasonable.

    1. Re:Special deals. by weez75 · · Score: 1

      How about "Buy a Kia get a free Dell DJ!" Looks a little more comparable. A cheap plastic knockoff for a cheap plastic knockoff.

      --
      Of course we torture people, we need the information --Gen. Pinochet
    2. Re:Special deals. by Asterax · · Score: 1

      A Mazda is any different? Heh.

  28. Irony? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Isn't Micheal Dell who said a while back, before Steve Jobs was called back that Apple should sell their assets and redistribute money to the shareholders?

    What a moron. Never liked the guy, crap computers (and I'm certainly not the only one to think that) and annoying commercials.

    I'll never buy their stuff.

    1. Re:Irony? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a moron. Never liked the guy, crap computers (and I'm certainly not the only one to think that) and annoying commercials.

      I agree, Steve Jobs and Apple suck!

      I'll never buy their stuff.
      Like anyone can afford Apple's overpriced pice of shit priority hardware and OS. I would rather get a real machine.

  29. Re:dell sucks by ejaw5 · · Score: 1

    Actually, it seems they're selling the support that comes with the computer. ..and from working at a University help desk their service is pretty good. (quick RMAs)

    --

    $cat /dev/random > Sig
  30. Holiday Shopping Season...? by armyofone · · Score: 2, Insightful

    From the article...
    "We are expanding our product offerings and enhancing Dell.com, and doing it in time for the holiday buying period so important to consumers."

    Who is he trying to kid? I'd venture to say that the holiday shopping season is a lot more important to retailers and manufacturers than it is to 'consumers'.

    --
    "A revolution without dancing is... a revolution not worth having"
    1. Re:Holiday Shopping Season...? by afidel · · Score: 1

      You must be one of the old geezers that hangs out around here occasionally. For kids Xmas is THE most important day of the year. Plus for many people the production and selling season leading up to the holidays is the time they are most likely to get overtime, also many companies give a holiday bonus. So yes, the holidays are an important time of year for consumers as well as retailers.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  31. And next Gateway by charon_on_acheron · · Score: 1

    will release their own music player called the Gateway 2000.

  32. What a wonderfully done troll... by justMichael · · Score: 1

    That or a completely clueless person.

    I'm hoping it's the former ;)

  33. Cool, another music format by HarryCallahan · · Score: 1

    mp3, itunes, ogg, wma, dell.... Will the best offering please win and soon.

    1. Re:Cool, another music format by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      iTunes is not a music format, it is a digital music jukebox capable of playing MP3, AAC, AIFF, and probably anything else as long as a plugin is written for it.

      The iTMS is using AAC files with a limited DRM scheme, called 'Fair Play' (which is built into QuickTime)

    2. Re:Cool, another music format by HarryCallahan · · Score: 1

      Yeah I know it's a player. In absence of a generally accepted term for the actual format that the iTunes music service utilises to encode their music I have simply called it "iTunes" format. Do you have another name for the format (not the service or player)? And no AAC is not good enough there is no such thing as a generic AAC format, headers, DRM etc make the various offerings incompatible with each other hence adding to the clutter.

    3. Re:Cool, another music format by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, you can use QuickTime to encode a "plain" MPEG 4 AAC audio file if you want. (As in, no DRM involved, just a raw MPEG AAC bitstream.)

      There is an MPEG spec for AAC and even commercially available chipsets that implement the decoding of said spec (though usually only the LC profile) But I think LC profile is what everyone is using anyway.

      I have the Fraunhofer AAC evaluation encoder and decoder around somewhere - this has been around forever.

      I think LiquidAudio was probably the earliest adopter of AAC. Widespread adoption has been slow - probably because licensing was put in the hands of Dolby and they took forever to come up with some reasonable terms.

  34. Re:Compared to Apple's own by emilymildew · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Intelligent reasons why I'd choose a Mac over another machine? I get more done. I don't know how to explain it, but I get so much more done on this than I ever did on my PCs. And you know, there's something to be said for asthetics. I hear people make fun of this reason all the time, but why shouldn't I want to look at something pretty if I am going to be looking at it for long periods of time? What's wrong with wanting to see something asthetically pleasing when I sit down at my computer?

  35. Corporate Rock by Master+Bait · · Score: 1
    Perhaps we can have a new category for the Billboard Top 100 -- Corporate Rock. Peppy and positive tunes designed to bring out the best productivity and upbeat morale for your employees!

    --
    "Only in their dreams can men truly be free 'twas always thus, and always thus will be."
    --Tom Schulman
  36. Another Online Music Store? by peachawat · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This can pose a real threat to iTunes Music Store if Dell Music Store uses the same format as buymusic.com. That is, music "bought" from both stores can be used/played on one computer, in one portable player, seamlessly. And once the format catches on, here will come a windfall of many many music stores that use the same DRM encumbered format.

    Of course Apple has a better, more sensible solution. But it will not be able to take an onslaught of many online stores that use the same format.

    It's Mac vs PC all over again. This time it is important for Apple to dominate the online music market. Or licenses its ACC to other online music stores and portable players...

  37. Ugh.... by jeffkjo1 · · Score: 1

    This is a disgusting press release, it's not even a real article. I hunger for real information, not PR babblings.

  38. Can You Say Apple Envy? by THotze · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Has anyone used a Dell PC lately? I've had to fix SO MANY fairly recent (ie shipped with Win XP) Dells that its not even funny. Now, admitadely, a MP3 player isn't as complicated as a space heater... *ahem* I mean, a Pentium 4 3GHz system... but, well, Dell seems to be almost entirley concerned with undercutting competitor's prices and offering slightly better #'s where it's the facts and figures that are a selling point (Basically, I figure that if you take an iPod, add 5GB of space and take $50 off their selling point, you've got what Dell wants to sell their device as). Of course, the catch is, it WON'T be an iPod, it won't have the same sex appeal, it won't have as nice of headphones, etc.

    I've been under the impression, however, that Dell was still by enlarge a corporate/business PC manufacturer. I'm wondering what Dell is thinking, trying to do this... even their PDA's can be explained as trying to expand themselves into a 'one stop shop' for corporate computing, like some sort of HP or IBM, but a MP3 player? Weird. And I can't see how they'd expect to get Dell-like margins out of this.... which makes me think they've probably cut quite a few corners.... everywhere.

    And my understanding from the Apple iTunes store was that the only way that Apple managed to pull it off was because of their goodstanding with the industry... being Apple and all. Were they a trailblazer making it easy for Dell, or is this just going to be a really inoperable service with none of the music I want?

    I guess we'll see.

    1. Re:Can You Say Apple Envy? by aliens · · Score: 1

      it won't have the same sex appeal

      While I understand that statement, there is just something wrong about an electronic device having 'sex appeal'... er I mean, whatever, you get my point.

      --
      -- taking over the world, we are.
    2. Re:Can You Say Apple Envy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      The iPod has social value. For instance, when you're sitting on a cross-country flight and someone next to you whips out an MP3 player, you look to see if it's an iPod. If you own one, you ask them what they think of it. If you don't, you ask them the same to find out if they think it's something you should own. If it's some cheap rip-off, like this Dell, you don't bother to say anything.

    3. Re:Can You Say Apple Envy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know, I haven't had any problems whatsoever with the 2 Dells I've bought in the past year (2.4GHz and 2.5GHz Dementia 4550 P4s).

    4. Re:Can You Say Apple Envy? by mcrbids · · Score: 1

      I just lambasted somebody for this, but I just can't help it here:

      1) its should be it's - a contraction of "it is" as in "it is not even funny".

      2) admitadely should be admittedly

      3) entirley should be entirely

      4) competitor's should be competitors'. "competitor's" is possesive singular, "competitors'" is possesive plural.

      5) by enlarge should be "by and large".

      6) "but a MP3 player" should be "but an MP3 player".

      7) goodstanding should be "good standing" - two words!

      8)"inoperable" should be "inter-operable" or "interoperable".

      OK, I'm being a hypocrite. So sue me, already. I just have a certain "pain" threshold reading somebody else's work, and this post reaches that threshold...

      I hope you don't hate me for this post.

      --
      I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    5. Re:Can You Say Apple Envy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know, I haven't had any problems whatsoever with the 2 Dells I've bought in the past year (2.4GHz and 2.5GHz Dementia 4550 P4s).

      Just a FUD alert. Notice how parent said they had to fix Dells, but didnt give any reason why. Just spewin out crap without any details at all, then moves to another topic very quickly.

    6. Re:Can You Say Apple Envy? by JasonAsbahr · · Score: 1

      I'm curious, can you talk more about the problems you've seen with recent Dell hardware? I'm trying to decide if I should adjust my opinion that buying Dell means a more stable box and tested box than buying something from the small computer shop down the street. (My experience with the small computer shops have been mixed, to say the least...)

    7. Re:Can You Say Apple Envy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agree to this. If Dell designs a square, it will come out a circle after they cut all the corners until none is left. This is what they spend their R&D on, sadly.

    8. Re:Can You Say Apple Envy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Believe it or not, some women (and guys) have electronic devices to deal with their... umm.. sexual needs. To them these devices have sex appeal. Not that there is anyting wrong with that (tm).

  39. Counterpoints by Infonaut · · Score: 4, Insightful
    1) Apple had a lead (time-to-market wise) because they released the Mac product first. If they hadn't released the Mac product first, they would have no lead. It's all just vapor until you actually get the product out the door. Also, there are no guarantees that Jobs could have scored the distribution deals that he did if the Music Store hadn't been released Mac-only at first. This was a testbed not just for Apple, but for the labels.

    2) Apple's strategy has long been to survive through innovation. Just as 3M will always have copycats selling Post-It knockoffs, Apple will always be followed by the Dells of the world. Apple knows this; it's happened time after time in the past. But Apple's DNA revolves around being different. You can call it a marketing ploy, but it seems to be a part of the culture there. Dell has become successful because of its distribution model. Apple has become successful because of its continuous innovation. And just because Apple doesn't dominate the industry doesn't mean that it's not a successful company.

    3) Dell is in a great position to copy Apple. But Apple has far more experience at this game, in part because of that lead time you were referring to. Apple also has connections to the music industry that Dell can't match. In the end, it comes down to which company can implement their Windows music service in a manner that entices customers. The labels have had online music sites for quite some time now, and it wasn't until the iTunes Music Store came along that suddenly the popular wisdom flipped 180 degrees and everyone started saying, "Duh! This is so easy. Why didn't someone do it before now?" Well, perhaps it wasn't done before because it wasn't really as easy as everyone now supposes.

    4) I've been watching Apple get written off for the last two decades. Oddly, most of the reports of Apple's demise usually come right after they've created something new and innovative. The pundits always come out of the woodwork to declare that Apple is totally screwed now, because their competitors will surely copy them and eat their lunch. Damned if you innovate, damned if you don't.

    --
    Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ
    1. Re:Counterpoints by callipygian-showsyst · · Score: 1
      It's all just vapor until you actually get the product out the door.

      Sort of like the dual-processor G5 (which, AFAIK, is still not shipping!)

    2. Re:Counterpoints by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YDKS

    3. Re:Counterpoints by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sort of like the dual-processor G5 (which, AFAIK, is still not shipping!)

      Got mine this morning. And I seem to remember something about some school that got like a thousand of them. So yeah, you bet your ass they're shipping.

    4. Re:Counterpoints by Reverberant · · Score: 1
      Sort of like the dual-processor G5 (which, AFAIK, is still not shipping!)

      You would be mistaken.

    5. Re:Counterpoints by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      What about these, out at Virginia Tech?

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
  40. How many prisoners does it take... by Renderer+of+Evil · · Score: 1

    to make a Dell Jukebox? You have to wonder sometime

  41. Re:dell sucks by Skyshadow · · Score: 4, Insightful
    nothing better than selling generic computers at an extreme markup.

    Yeah, 'cause that's the secret of Dell's success.

    (sigh) I can tell this is going to become a "Dell sux!" and "Dell is just copying Apple!" thread, but the truth is that Dell is moving in a fairly purposeful way to fill an enormous gaping hole that Apple left in the market when they didn't release iTunes for the PC right away. When Apple loses all of that potential for market share to Dell, you gotta just come clean and admit: "Apple screwed up again".

    Dell has become an enormously wealthy company because they're good at taking other people's well-concieved-yet-poorly-implemented ideas and improving on them or making them easier to sell. This isn't a small deal -- hugely promising companies full of smart people have suffered from an inability to do this for ages (SGI, anyone)? From selling computers customized on the web to rebranding their own peripherals to packaging the right software, Dell's made one smart business decision after another.

    Anyhow, here's the real spin here: Apple fucked up, and now they're going to pay.

    --
    Every year during my review, I just pray the words "slashdot.org" aren't mentioned.
  42. Re:Compared to Apple's own by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know how to explain it

    its called dillusion

  43. Re:Compared to Apple's own by questamor · · Score: 1

    Gah trollmemes are breeding!

    I long suspected most slashdot posts were computer generated combinations of a base one hundred original posts from way back in 1997, just constantly remixed and moderated up into survival or nonsurvival. Witness the header of the slashdot page if you're logged in for a hint; A Squadron of uber mummies? It's a hint!

    Only problem is someone seems to have slipped the BSD Troll, the Freelance Gig troll and the TiBook Tinsnips troll into the mix.

    Fact: We're doomed! :)

  44. Lighting a fire under Apple's.... by Ibanez · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I wonder if this means Apple will get a Windows version of iTunes out sooner. With this announcement, and Dell's already well established consumer base, Apple's hopes of trying to capture the PC market might be thwarted if they don't act fast...

    Blake

    1. Re:Lighting a fire under Apple's.... by Hagen · · Score: 1

      Rumor is that Apple has moved up their release of iTunes for Windows from December to October. Stay tuned!

  45. its all about price $$ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dell has a history of undercutting their competition, as I'm sure they'll do here.

    I bet they'll come in at about $100 less than the ipod for comparable space/features. If they do that, and this thing is the right size, they've got a winner here, even if it is inferior to the ipod, which it most certainly will be.

    -beavis

  46. translation by bladeohlsson · · Score: 1

    translation "We are ripping off great ideas from Apple to steal more customers again" "our product of course is much more of a spujunker ( The worst nintendo video game ever made called Spelunker + Junker =- Spelunker) than the competition and our customers are so dumb and cheap they don't care!" -MD

    --
    http://www.ohlssonvox.com
  47. I know this is hard, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Whitebox is always cheaper.

    I used to support a rather large organization with a contract with a similar supplier. We bought someone, and I had the leeway to try something new. That was whitebox. The result was about $400 per pc less, and about $300 less in support/continuity.

    I know it is hard to push through, but god, it will make your life easier.

  48. Now that they've become Apple by cubicledrone · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Dell's announcement causes Apple's stock to drop almost 9% in two days.

    So much for being rewarded for real innovation and hard work. Nothing is as important, obviously, as being #1.

    --
    Business isn't willing to pay for products, innovation and careers, so we get brands, mortgage commercials and layoffs.
  49. Re:Apple blew it the day they breached their contr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jesus that's one hell of a stretch there pal. Besides, Microsoft sucks and you zealot fanboy Ballmer-bitch wanna-bes just have to learn to accept it. Now get lost.

  50. Not usefull to me. by pavon · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Its cool that more of these services exist. But I can't say that any of them serves the use that I had for Napster.

    Now I can't speak for everyone but I will speak for myself. I love MP3's. I listen to my MP3's far more often than my CD's. However, I have never wanted to buy MP3's. I like owning CD's, and there are alot of good reasons for this. But the main one, is that is is a high quality, lossless, patent free, universally supported format. What if I don't' want to (or am not able to) use the IP encumbered MP3 or AAC file formats? What if the mp3's that sounded fine on cheap computer speakers, are not up to par with my new system? File formats change, and transcoding sucks. That's why I insist on having CD's, because I want my music to be usable for lifetime.

    I don't want to buy mp3's on the internet. I want to discover music on the internet. Five years ago, things would work like this. I would hear about a cool band from a friend in a different town, or find their website, or see them in a cdnow.com "people who bought x, also bought y." message. So I would jump on napster, download some music from them, (oh, and do some lyrics searches to make sure it was labeled propely) and if I liked them I would put them on my cdnow wishlist, which I then bought every couple months (save on shipping).

    Now when I find out about some band I go to amazon.com - can't play their crappy samples in linux. Go to their website - no mp3's or just radio songs. Look for fansites with bootlegs - usually none. And with half an hour wasted, I walk away frustrated that I now know nothing more about the band than I did before. I can tell you for certain that I have bought less CD's since napster went down, just because it is harder to find out about new music. I have been temped to sign up with eMusic, as it would make this task far easier and more enjoyable, but cannot justify the cost, as I will end up buying CD's for all the artists I like, anyway.

    So here is my suggestion. Create a subscription based mp3 service that also sells CD's and gives credit (say 3 weeks access, or 75 downloads) for each CD that you buy. Then people that buy enough CD's will have free access to download mp3's, and those who don't buy CD's will pay as well. Couple this with "if you like foo, try bar" info, and streaming radio shows which have the entire catalogue of music to legally draw from, and you would have one very enjoyable, and affordable venue for fans to discover new music. And the artist gets paid.

    The only part of this that has potential problems at the moment is the radio station. I have seen so much contradictory information about internet streaming that I don't know what the exact legal situation is. However, one would think that if you had express permission of all the artists you were playing you should not have to pay the stupid FCC royalty license. If this is not the case the policy should be changed, and while Joe "I want to stream any music I want over the internet, without permission" Schmoe may not be able to get that change, I guarantee you that if Apple and Dell got together and pushed for this, people would listen. But suppose now that it is legal. Why should the service hire DJ's when they can get people to do it for free? That's right, let anyone who wants to run a simple radio show on your site. The costs shouldn't be high, they just put together a song list (.m3u) every week, (or month, or afternoon, or hour) and people stream the mp3's, like on mp3.com. So, the major cost is the bandwidth, which is dependant on the total number of listeners, not DJ's. If a dj becomes popular, you can offer him perks like being able to run his show like a real studio (ie, talk between songs, etc), you give him credit to support him music finding habit, and you can multicast his show to save money.

    Now not only would the artist be paid for use of their music, independent labels would be on equal footing with big labels, since the big labels would not control the similar band links (they are autonomou

    1. Re:Not usefull to me. by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      What would be cool is a FLAC based music service... the files would be bigger but it would be free of both IP encumberance and quality loss.

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    2. Re:Not usefull to me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "That's why I insist on having CD's, because I want my music to be usable for lifetime."

      Anyone who has ever heard a 24-bit studio master feels the same way about CDs and their inferior sound. Screw CDs, I'm waiting for DVD Audio discs to take their place.

    3. Re:Not usefull to me. by pavon · · Score: 1

      \begin{vent}
      I just came to check and see if anyone had posted any comments in responce to mine, and discovered that someone had modded me down as overrated. The purpose of moderation is to save reader's time, modding somthing down as overrated is basically saying that you think that reading this post is a waste of the reader's time.

      So this moderation annoys me because no one has posted any real criticism about my idea, so I don't know why the moderator thought my opinion was not worth reading. Furthermore, I did not have a high score to begin with (how can something be overrated when it wasn't highly rated to begin with?), and now even fewer people will read this I won't get any feedback on my idea, which is the entire reason I post to begin with.

      grr, well at least I am motivated to meta-moderate more often now.
      \end{vent}

      Now to the the people that were kind enough to talk to me :)

      I definitly agree with everything you say about CD quality. (I was thinking of commenting on that in the original post, but decided I use to many parenthetical statments already :) CD's aren't perfect, but they are the best quality, most portable audio format available to consumers.

      Flac would be nice. Both methods are almost the same to me - download flac, burn a back up CD, and encode a mp3 for my portable, or buy a CD rip and then encode an mp3. About the same amount of work - less if you use flac in all your music devices. But CD's are prettier, and that gets me all the time :)

      In terms of crippled CD's I've never actually run acrossed one. To me they have just been a potential concern on the horizon, which I hoped wouldn't become widespread. But yes, a proprietary formated (crippled) CD is just as bad as a proprietory file format, if not worse.

  51. Re:Compared to Apple's own by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nothing is wrong with that, AS LONG AS YOU'RE A MEMBER OF THE GNAA!! And if you know what the GNAA is then you also know I'm kidding that that you need to get out more. ;-)

  52. humans are 2nd class citizens by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 2, Interesting

    How come Apple iTunes and this new Dell service are exempt from DMCA? Live365's rules for humans quotes some of the many ways the DMCA prohibits download on demand, even if the uploader owns all the rights. But their rules for corporations don't mention these DMCA restrictions:

    i. You may not include in your Internet Radio Programs specific sound recordings within one hour of a request by a listener or at a time designated by the listener.
    ii. In any three-hour period, you should not intentionally program more than three songs (and not more than two songs in a row) from the same recording; you should not intentionally program more than four songs (and not more than three songs in a row) from the same recording artist or anthology/box set.
    iii. Continuous looped Internet Radio Programs may not be less than three hours long.
    iv. Retransmissions of Internet Radio Programs may be performed at scheduled times as follows:
    a. Internet Radio Programs of less than one hour: no more than three times in a two-week period;
    b. Internet Radio Programs longer than one hour: no more than four times in any two-week period.
    v. You should not publish advance program guides or use other means to pre-announce when particular sound recordings will be played or the order in which they will be played.
    vi. You should only include in your Internet Radio Programs sound recordings that are authorized for performance in the United States.
    vii. You should pass through (and not disable or remove) identification or technological protection information included in the sound recording (if any).

    Why are corporations, like Apple and Dell, allowed to exercise rights inherent in their property and licenses, while the People are prohibited?

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:humans are 2nd class citizens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why are corporations, like Apple and Dell, allowed to exercise rights inherent in their property and licenses, while the People are prohibited?

      Because Apple bought a fucking license to do so, you idiot. You didn't.

      (As for Dell, we can talk about them when they actually deliver something. Until then, I have little use for wishes and pipe dreams.)

    2. Re:humans are 2nd class citizens by RdsArts · · Score: 1

      Well, it's all about price, really.

      You pay 15$ for a CD, while most large corperations pay roughly $2, $3 million per senator. And that's with a bulk discount.

  53. Um...So this is me... by greymond · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I hear a lot of people bashing Dell for making "an Apple iPod Rip Off" however i'd like to point out that Apple's iPod was not the first MP3 player on the market, nor will it be the last. Right now if you go into your local computer store or your favorite online shopping center you'll see countless models.

    Now whether the Nomad is better than the iPod is definately a matter of opinion, much like if Apple's are better than...Orange's (PC)? Each person has a unique and individual need and desire when it comes to the system they use or the music player and platform they choose.

    If Dell wishes to make an MP3 player, than so be it. It could be cool, it could be lame, but its NOT an ipod rip-off. If IBM desides to make one, cool. If Gateway desides to make one, cool. If Microsoft decides to make, we'll bitch. But, I repeat, it's not a rip-off of iPod. Unless it comes out looking exactly the same (which it most likely wont) then you might have a valid argument.

    As for me I don't listen to enough music so i'll be at the gym with my zaurus plus a 128mb SD card and my "$10.99" headphones listening to Lords of Acid while I run on the tredmill for an hour. Then i'll put in my wireless card at the Jamba Juice next door and check my email.

    Lates.

    1. Re:Um...So this is me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah signed off too soon. As for the service Apple's iTunes is definately well done. But there are still many other online MP3 "retailers" available.

    2. Re:Um...So this is me... by ioErr · · Score: 1

      It is not the fact that Dell makes a portable MP3 player alone that makes people call it a rip off. It is the fact that the Dell Digital Jukebox looks a lot like the Apple iPod, combined with the fact that Dell is also offering a service for purchasing downloadable music.

  54. It will be a cold day in Dell... by abulafia · · Score: 1
    Look at the margins. Dell's trying to be a consumer electronics store. Ask the Good Guys what your margins are in that market.

    A service might be a money spinner, but is a risky gambit here.

    --
    I forget what 8 was for.
  55. Re:dell sucks by jvagner · · Score: 1

    Dell is an impressive company to be sure, but here they seem to be getting their inspiration by merging the online music strategy of Apple and the consumer goods strategy of Gateway.

    Not sure they can pull this off. Can they be as brave as Apple?

  56. that's exactly what this market needs by Richthofen80 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...competition. Apple's pricepoint is too high. Hopefully, competition will bring the prices down. How about a rebate if you sign up for the service, to make the hardware cheaper.

    --
    Reason, free market capitalism, and individualism
  57. Ummm... by 1000101 · · Score: 1

    i actually like the design

  58. Time for a 'trade dress' smackdown. by phillymjs · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Must everyone follow a successful Apple product with their own half-assed, 'me too' version of it? This is why Apple now attempts to patent or trademark everything they do, people!

    This Dell thing (the "metooPod"?) looks similar enough to the iPod that maybe Apple should seriously kick around the idea of filing another 'trade dress' suit, the way they did to take care of the Future Power e-Power or the eMachines eOne-- I mean, since practically everything else Dell makes is dark in color, it seems mighty suspicious to me that this is white. The screen size and placement looks almost identical. From the photo I've seen it also looks like the GUI is pretty similar. I see they've taken pains to move the battery gauge from the upper right corner (where the iPod has it) to the upper left corner-- reminds me of the difference between the Apple menu and Start menu.

    At least the iPod has enough mindshare amongst the target market that no amount of B.S. marketing from Dell will make people think they did it first (I still remember Michael Dell's bullshit claim that Dell was the first company to build wireless networking into their laptops). The only way Dell will move very many of these things is by irrevocably bundling them "free" with their systems. I predict we'll start seeing a lot of them on eBay after a while, and then the product will die a quiet, relatively quick death like Dell's iMac wanna-be, the WebPC.

    ~Philly

  59. Labels would not have allowed it. by willy_me · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Apple squandered an insane amount of positive free press and a killer lead by initially releasing a "Mac Only" service.

    The record labels never would have gone for a Windows service. By limiting it to Mac users they were limiting the scope of the experiment - basically just checking to see if it was a good idea.

    1. Re:Labels would not have allowed it. by tuomoks · · Score: 1

      Correct ! Been there, done that.. ( different industry but it's alwasy same ). have a nice day.

    2. Re:Labels would not have allowed it. by IM6100 · · Score: 1

      Apple could run the iMusic service at a substantial loss. It's about selling the Apple brand, and it's about selling Macintosh PCs. Releasing it only on the Mac was an important part of that strategy.

      --
      A Good Intro to NetBS
  60. Re:dell sucks by oboeaaron · · Score: 1

    RMAs are fast yes, assuming you can coax the support drones to issue you one without hanging on the line for hours and running their pointless Dell Diagnostics (cr) app. I was once instructed by a Dell tech-support rep to run their diags by booting off a floppy in order get the correct error code which would indicate that the floppy was defective. You can't write material that good.

    --
    Journey onward.
  61. Moderators... by bitrott · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    This poster isn't actually saying anything. He's certainly not bringing anything to the conversation that wasn't there before.

    1. Re:Moderators... by dave1212 · · Score: 1

      huh? Chose to lose mod points on this discussion to respond to your silly post. This guy had lots to say, and the moderation reflects that. If there were ever a post ready to be modded into oblivion, it would be yours. If you're going to troll, don't do it while logged in, k?

  62. Dell, shmell... by FVK · · Score: 1

    I hereby boldly predict a dismal failure for the dellPOD and their michael-dell-washes-jobs'-nutsack-yet-again-music -service.

    But on a slightly different note, it should be said that Dell adds absolutely nothing to the industry except being largely responsible for the price wars. ( which many can be said to have profited from, admittedly ). But they really are a bunch of insipid co-opters, they've done nothing first or better except commoditize the PC into a largely disposable, barely desirable $399-599 piece of shared-memory crap.
    All they have that is unique to them are the extremely low end, cheap as hell clown-boxes that everyone in mass media and Wall St. love them for. Within the industry every company struggles to compete with their McDonald's philosophy and has neither time or will to even try and innovate like Apple does. And in every city there are many smaller shops trying to stay alive while also building real configs that are balanced and high-quality. I pity them because the consumer x86 market isn't worth persuing anymore, the type of people who buy at small stores are the type where you lose money answering all their retarded questions on the phone shortly following the sale. MS plays a big part, but DELL is instrumental in making the PC platform suck as much as it does. I for one wish them ill on all their Apple-inspired adventures especially, because it is in these acts that they appear the most repugnant.

    1. Re:Dell, shmell... by ocelotbob · · Score: 1
      Sort of like how Jobs copied countless other online music purchasing systems, non? Face it, everyone copies from everyone. Period. Linux copies from Windows, Windows copies from OS X, OS X copies from Linux, the process is eternal, as everyone looks at what everyone else does, and does the next logical step in the next product line refresh/upgrade.

      Additionally, don't knock cheap PCs. A $2000 system isn't for everyone, period. A $1000 system isn't for everyone, either. Some people just need a simple machine that doesn't offer all of the bells and whistles of the latest and greatest. Just like a BMW is a nice car, for a large swath of the market, a little Nissan is just as practical, and a hell of a lot cheaper. Quit being such an elitist asshole, and give some reasonable suggestions for actually fixing the PC market, mmmkay?

      --

      Marxism is the opiate of dumbasses

    2. Re:Dell, shmell... by toddestan · · Score: 1

      It's been my impression that Dell is slightly above the real bottom feeders like eMachines and Compaq. Atleast the cheapest Dell offers a free upgrade to 256MB of ram, and actually uses 333Mhz DDR ram (even if it's shared). Sure beats the peice of crap Compaqs with 128MB of SDRAM and Intel Extreme graphics. Of course, they still aren't that great, most of them are slow as hell and their case design is terrible in terms of upgrades. But atleast they are somewhat useful, unlike the eMachines that are ready to be trashed the instant you take them out of the box.

      And as for the whitebox computers from the small makers, many of them are pretty good - but I have seen a fair share of crap from them too (ooh look, we got this box of power supplies for $3.50 each! woohoo!)

    3. Re:Dell, shmell... by 1000101 · · Score: 1

      earth to moron, come in moron....

      my grandmother is 80 years old. 80. she uses a computer for email and that's about it. i specifically told her not to buy a beige box from a local retailer because i knew she would need help. what did i tell her?? "hey grandma, you can buy a Dell for $400 right now and it will do everything you need and more". she couldn't be happier. and i couldn't be happier because she calls Dell's tech support instead of me.

    4. Re:Dell, shmell... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is there a schmell in here?

  63. Speaking of BuyMusic.com... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please avoid their service like the plague.

    Some friends of mine wrote and delivered their DRM software, which BuyMusic took and then claimed they wrote themselves (in breach of contract), and thus decided not to pay their DRM solution provider. But since BuyMusic was big and has lots of lawyers, and the smaller software developer was relying on BuyMusic to pay up to stay in business, my friends essentially got the shaft.

    All this, to my understanding, is currently in litigation, so who knows when it will be resolved. Needless to say, a bunch of them have been forced to find new jobs, since their former company couldn't pay them without BuyMusic honoring their contract and paying what they owed for services rendered.

    Posted Anonymously to avoid legal issues for revealing this info.

  64. Wha? by TheVidiot · · Score: 1


    I can't wait for the preloaded DJ Dell and the Interns single.

  65. Apple sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because, dude, Dell rulz. Apple's iPad is overpriced. Dell knows how to sell cheap. Plus, there not faggots.

    1. Re:Apple sucks by MoneyT · · Score: 1

      Thankfuly Apple users can spell

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
  66. Actually, they did innovate: by lpret · · Score: 2, Informative
    They created the direct-selling model for PCs. Everyone else had always sold their computers at Radio Shack or whatever electronics store they could, while Dell cut out the middlemen and used that cut to lower their costs. It's not an invention per se, but it's an innovative way to do business that had not been exploited in this market yet.

    Kudos to Michael Dell.

    --
    This is my digital signature. 10011011001
    1. Re:Actually, they did innovate: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't that the point though? Dell is a great distribution company and has made some great innovations in the supply chain arena, but what kind of innovations do they have when it comes to technology? None that I can think of.

  67. Re:dell sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i had heard dell support was good from people like you, and i bought one. the quality is far less than i expected, and my tech support calls and emails have been fruitless so far. screw dell.

  68. Revolutionary? by sekabe · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "We are revolutionizing technology for our customers -- again." How is a new digital media player so revolutionary, if Apple already has one?

    --
    "Great spirits have always found violent opposition from mediocrities." -Albert Einstein
  69. Oh Hell, Its a Dell! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's what I say about Dells.
    I wonder if their Tech Support is in India?

    "I was downloading a lovely Hindi song and then it alll went wrong..."

    One of the easy ways to stop Dell putting in a tender fro a supply of PCs - "Keyboards must not be black with white lettering!"

  70. fuck payin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i just go to warez sites and get my shit, FUCK PAYING. get it for free from the warez sites

  71. Re:dell sucks by Graff · · Score: 1
    Anyhow, here's the real spin here: Apple fucked up, and now they're going to pay.

    How is that? They opened the iTunes Music Store (iTMS) as soon as they could, which meant just for Macs because that software was an easy write and done first. They have been extremely successful with iTMS for the Mac which has encouraged more artists to sell their songs through the store, building up the music catalog. Now there is news that Apple may have the Windows software finished early. A quote from the article:
    And Apple, NEWSWEEK learned, quietly informed some music insiders that it's moved up the date for expanding its current Mac-only iTunes for the vast universe of Windows-based PCs to mid-October.


    Now Dell on the other hand has been lagging in the music field. They only have an announcement of their plans and a promise that it will be out in time for Christmas. From the article:
    Dell products that will be available for purchase in time for the holidays include a digital music player, online music service, multifunction LCD television and computer monitor, a home entertainment projector and a wireless handheld.


    There are almost no details about all of these things. It doesn't say what artists will be available on the music service. It doesn't say the size of the player, it's features, what formats it supports, how large the hard drive, the price. It doesn't mention much about the multimedia application other than saying it will be an "important tool".

    Frankly right now all this amounts to vaporware. Apple has products out for months or years that have proven themselves and made waves. People drool over the iPod and compare any new music service to iTMS. Dell's offerings, even if they come out in time and are amazing, are going to take time to build a user base. In the meantime Apple will have the lead and as long as Apple continues to innovate it should maintain a lead. At the very least the two might split the market down the middle, leaving a very nice chunk for each of them. Considering all this I would say that it is extremely unlikely that "Apple fucked up, and now they're going to pay".
  72. Absolute Bull.... by Brian_Ellenberger · · Score: 2, Informative

    "So with this huge market share, what R&D has Dell contributed to the world? Absolutely nothing, except for their one invention: a tech support button [theregister.co.uk] on their machines which never worked properly and they longer support. Every single aspect of Dell's business is copied from other manufacturers. There is absolutely no innovation going on there."

    Bull. How many major PC makers did PC advanced PC customization before Dell, where you pick exactly what components you want from Monitor to Video Card to Speakers? Dell also led the way in direct customer sales. And their supply-chain is one of the best of ANY company.

    Brian

    1. Re:Absolute Bull.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Whoa, their supply chain is great! I'm getting wet just thinking about it!

      Dell certainly has carved out an exciting niche in the computer world, haven't they? They certainly don't deserve their reputation as mediocre and boring!

    2. Re:Absolute Bull.... by raga · · Score: 1

      We are talking R&D in computer technology, not a supply-chain, where, to paraphrase Scott McNealy, the only focus is to ship more bananas at a cheaper price (with a bruise on it.)

      And here's what your fav R&D company has innovated.

      Bull indeed.

      cheers- raga

    3. Re:Absolute Bull.... by johneee · · Score: 1

      Which is exactly the same kind of 'innovation' that Henry Ford brought to the automobile industry.

      There was nothing special about the Model T as a car, but whoooooo boy, was there any other car in all of history that's been as influential as the Tin Lizzie?

      --
      - ------- There are ten kinds of people in the world. Those who understand binary, and those who... Huh?
  73. good luck by goon+america · · Score: 2, Interesting
    As much as I loathe Dell and love Apple, competition can only make the market better.

    What would I do if I were Apple right now? Start selling iPods at cost. 'Course, Apple's got its nose too high in the air to ever consider such a thing, and that's what burns them every time.

    sigh...

    1. Re:good luck by burns210 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ya, silly apple! they produce the number 1 selling mp3 player AND make a nice profit on every sale. What are they thinking?

      Apple does not, and will not, price cut to become the lowend(and often low quality) computer maker. They sell you quality stuff, and they charge you for that quality.

    2. Re:good luck by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      Who says they aren't already?

    3. Re:good luck by Generic+Guy · · Score: 0, Troll
      [Apple] They sell you quality stuff, and they charge you for that quality.

      Yeah, and they also charge you when you need to get that "quality" fixed. Quite a lot, in fact!

      (Okay, I admit this is a bit of a troll. But they're repair practices and price structure seem more of a racket than auto dealers. I stopped buying Apple products back in the mid 90's because of it.)

      --
      { - Generic Guy - }
  74. With all Dell products there is one guarantee... by amberspry · · Score: 1

    every product comes with their own little gremlin to make very odd things happen for no apparent reason.

    If you stare really closely you will actually see the DJ's gremlin staring back at you from the middle of the play/pause button. Just don't stare to hard or you will scare it away.
  75. Re:dell sucks by Basehart · · Score: 1

    "Dell's offerings, even if they come out in time and are amazing, are going to take time to build a user base"

    Wrong, Dell's consumer base are lemmings and millions of teens are going to get players made by Dell on christmas morning.

  76. Dell software? by Steveftoth · · Score: 1

    Wait, how many products have come out the awesome dell software labs? I really want to know because last I counted the only software to come out of dell was crappy system management software and it all 'blows.' So until they start producing good, quality software that works I'm going to sit this out.

    Maybe they will prove me wrong, but I'm not holding my breath until that happens.

  77. Will the RIAA get a clue now? by MongooseCN · · Score: 2, Funny

    RIAA exec 1: Look! Companies are selling music online. They are giving their customers what they want and making money. Logically this means we should do one thing.

    RIAA exec 2: Of course! Continue to sue our customers!

    RIAA exec 1: Because only WE know what's right for them!

  78. Gateway has a chance to dominate now by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    While Dell is piddling around with a half-assed music service, now is the time where Gateway could move ahead - all they have to do is partner with Apple to bundle the music store software when it comes out, and offer discounted iPods with systems!

    Gateway has shown good sense with digital music before, so it seems like a move they might well make especially when it could show up Dell.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  79. I'm disappointed in the display by inteller · · Score: 1

    I was hoping Dell was going to enter the wide screen plasma market. Lord knows we could use someone like Dell to drive the prices down in that area.

  80. Actually... by Kjella · · Score: 1

    I think Apple's original strategy with iTMS was to create a cool premium service that you coudld get only by buying a Mac...then later launch it for windows in order to capitalize on the whole market.

    Trouble is, the lag time waiting for the PC version of iTMS is so long that a smart competitor (Dell) has decided to step in and try to steal the hype.


    I think the lag time is mostly to create a stand-alone version of their current set-up, in particular including the iTunes shop and DRM and everything which is integrated in OS X on Mac. Doing that in a way that'll keep the record companies happy is a lot harder when you don't control the OS.

    [Going halfway off-topic...] Actually, I think it might be just as much Dell "testing the waters" for Apple. Personally, I just got a huge distaste of DRM right NOW! Ever tried installing a bigger HDD with WinXP? Use Powerquest's Drive Image, select "Upgrade drive", and you're done. Except that on the next boot, WinXP will make error 0x80090006 with no explaination, not allowing you to get into safe mode or any other recovery mode, and in general give you no idea what's going on.

    The reason? Microsoft thinks I'm a pirate. And then I have to reinstall, reauthorize and all that, taking 10x as long as replacing the new HDD, all because I wanted a bigger disk. If that Dell service is relying on some Windows DRM, I wouldn't entrust it with my music files if hell froze below absolute zero. Hell, right now I want to just rip out Windows and install Linux instead like the server in the corner, but some apps keep me back. That, and only that. Maybe I'll have another go at what I can get working in Wine, sigh...

    Kjella

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    1. Re:Actually... by IM6100 · · Score: 1

      Your mistake was installing Windows XP. Windows 2000 doesn't have the registration headaches, and it has everything that XP offers that is useful.

      --
      A Good Intro to NetBS
    2. Re:Actually... by tuomoks · · Score: 1

      Everybody thinks you are a pirate. The DRM gets tireing - I'm a developer and with all the DRM, IIS filters, firewall rules made by some outsider to our company, e-mail rules, etc.. I'm pissed and wasting more ( our company ) time to fight the environment than developing or listening MY OWN ( ogg from CDs I have bought ) music. At least I got our ( IT!! ) network people to understand that IBM, Intel. MS ( no comments, please ), Oracle, SUN, etc. are NOT for personal fun - we have to have access to development sites. Allmost works now. have a nice day.

  81. yeah but by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

    The interface is little different from a web browser. I imagine it wouldn't have been too much trouble for Apple to have iTMS work with a web browser in the meantime while they work on iTunes for Windows.

    1. Re:yeah but by Llywelyn · · Score: 1

      It would have been a big issue because they would need to integrate their DRM into a windows music player /and/ deal with a much larger group for tech support. I think Apple wanted to keep the initial release group small, and then expand from there.

      Also, I think Apple was of the view that "we get one shot at this, lets do it right." If they couldn't provide "the apple experience" they weren't going to provide anything. This has a lot of things going for it: this way, people won't try it with poorer integration and worse software and dismiss it, but will jump straight in feet first when they get the windows product launched.

      It takes a risk that someone will beat them to market with a better integrated product, but that's not much of a risk considering their timetable.

      --
      Integrate Keynote and LaTeX
    2. Re:yeah but by troc · · Score: 1

      The interface is essentially a web browser. It uses the Webcore from Safari to render the pages.

      Troc

      --
      Troc's dubious podcast and blog: http://www.trocnet.net
  82. Another Apple Rip Off?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dell Give me a break, if you really wanted to be like apple name yourself something like 'we rip off apple'.

    Stop stealing ideas and get your own.

    If apple has a product or service that makes money,THAT DOESN'T MEAN YOU HAVE TO COPY IT HALF BAKED!

    Dell stop stealing ideas.

  83. What I want in a portable music player by sirshannon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I want something that RealOne Rhapsody will work on. I don't really care to copy or download music, I just want to hear it on demand whenever I want to hear it. Rhapsody works great for that, a good price, the selection is pretty large, I can install the program whereever I want but I can't listen to it in the car yet. Put it on a portable with a wireless connection and I'm there.

  84. it's not even new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Looks a lot like an e.Digital Odyssey 1000, doesn't it?

    And check e.Digital's announcement:

    http://www.edigital.com/news/releases/pr091603.h tm l

    Not a coincidence I think.

    If you've used an Odyssey 1000, you know it was no great shakes. This unit will be smaller though, but probably bigger than an iPod.

  85. Well... by Kjella · · Score: 1

    I like owning CD's, and there are alot of good reasons for this. But the main one, is that is is a high quality, lossless, patent free, universally supported format.

    High quality: Ok
    Lossless: Umm 44.1KHz, 16bit isn't lossless compared to the original music, at least according to audiophiles. "Good enough" maybe, but that goes under quality
    Patent free: OK
    Universally supported: Except the new shiny discs which don't play in the computer (at least not the CD part, usually some heavy encrypted and compressed tracks) or any other device used for reading both CDs and CD-ROMs...

    If the CDs were 100% compliant Red Book Audio CD, I'd agree with you. But as long as I'll probably get some crippled, error-full (to kill CD-ROM readers), non-standard disc which noone knows if will be compatible with any player I might choose to buy in the future, I disagree.

    Kjella

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  86. Yup, another rip off. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
  87. offtopic die by 2057 · · Score: 1

    this is offtopic but i had an idea for a red hat linux based music player. la rhumba - light adaptable red hat ultimate music box a.... isnt i funneh!

    --
    For The Best Jazz/Hip-hop fusion > COlD DUCK
  88. The Best Thing About This: Dell vs. Microsoft by Nova+Express · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If both Dell and Microsoft are going to come up with their own "let's rip off Apple" music service, that means the two of them will be competing with each other. Oddly enough, Microsoft doesn't seem to like it when customers compete with them. And let's face it, a Dell/Microsoft split rift would be an annoyance for Microsoft, but a DISASTER for Dell.

    If I weren't so convinced that both of them were going to release DRM-crippled, dead-on-arrival, inelegent and unwieldy abortions in trying to ripoff iTunes, I'd say this has the potential to be interesting. As it is, I suspect both services will be dead (and iTunes still doing very well indeed) by mid-2005 or so...

    --
    Lawrence Person (lawrencepersonh@gmailh.com (remove all "h"s to mail)

    http://www.lawrenceperson.com/

    1. Re:The Best Thing About This: Dell vs. Microsoft by burns210 · · Score: 1

      i wonder what percentage of windows licesnses are for dell computers? how many desktops at home and workstations, along with servers, at work run on dells?

      granted, it may not be such a huge margin that MS would bow down to dell, but dell sells a lot of Windows licenses, and they could throw their weight around if they wanted.

  89. Maybe Apple didn't blow it... by skribble · · Score: 1

    What if Dell's DJ is a repackaged iPod? What if Dell's Music service is iTMS for PC's? It would be a win-win situation (provided Mike and Steve could get over thier fueding). Stranger things have happened in this industry

    --
    --- Nothing To See Here ---
  90. Re:dell sucks by GlassHeart · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Apple fucked up, and now they're going to pay.

    Really? The general assumption, even among those who are defending Dell here, appears to be that Dell is reacting to Apple in this case. Apple announced the iTunes Music Store more than four months ago, and have been working on the PC version of iTunes at least since then. They thought they could get it ready by the end of the year when they announced it, which means Apple thinks it takes at least six months.

    Since there are less then three months left (you can't finish it right on December 25 to make it to this Christmas shopping season), the Dell PC-side client likely has to be developed in more haste, and yet has to be deliberately somewhat different from iTunes. Dell is not known to have a proven server infrastructure for a music store ready. Dell is not known to have micropayments worked out with credit card companies. Dell hasn't announced the price, size of catalog (or even if any major labels have signed on!), battery life or capacity of the device, and you already think Apple is going to pay?

    Let me ask you another question: how will the Dell device connect to the PC? If they use USB1, then it'll be significantly slower than the iPod, and "full sync" will be a real pain. If they use USB2 or Firewire, then they're limiting themselves to a much smaller set of PC customers with recent PCs (like Apple, except Apple has Mac users).

    So unless you're a Dell insider and know all these details, how can you possibly pick a winner right now?

  91. To copy Apple not always a bad idea by ricar-dot-com · · Score: 1

    ... but if it's ANYTHING like other PC companies that have tried to copy apple, they're usually quite terrible

    Yeah. Like the Palm Pilot and Apple's (defunct) Newton, or the GUI, or...

    1. Re:To copy Apple not always a bad idea by General+Sherman · · Score: 1

      The GUI is liked by many people, but you can change it with a themeing application. Not hard to do at all.

      And about the Newton, I was referring to apple's good ideas. It's not hard to do better than the Newton.

      --
      - Sherman
  92. What font is that? by BandwidthHog · · Score: 1

    From the photo on the Yahoo story, it looks suspiciously like Chicago, the Apple system font of yore. Even Dell wouldn't be that blatant, would they?

    --

    Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?
  93. Better name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe they should have called it... ....Dell Boy.

  94. One Word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    iDull

  95. They're darn close to cost... by jpellino · · Score: 2, Informative

    check out the cost of the hd that's inside an iPod and they're not making much at all on these things.

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
  96. Re:dell sucks by Josuah · · Score: 1

    Anyhow, here's the real spin here: Apple fucked up, and now they're going to pay.

    The article states that their online music service will be available in time for the holiday season. However, there are now reports that Apple has moved up their Windows iTunes Music Store release date from the holiday season/end-of-year to mid-October. So, although Dell is going to provide an alternative, it looks like Apple is going to be the first-mover on Windows as well (you can't count BuyMusic.com since it's broken).

    Plus, Apple is developing a Windows application, much like how Real wants to leverage their Jukebox. An online store will be less polished, perform worse, and require web-based interaction. We already know how great iTunes is from a user perspective. A stand-alone web site can't match the experience.

  97. Dell Suck but unfortunately is better than most by marklamb · · Score: 1

    BTW it is Dell Inc. now, not Dell Comp. Corp. I actually work at Dell and in my opinion wait for the next generation/iteration of whatever they are offering. Anytime dell releases anything it usually won't have most of the bug worked out on the first attempt. Just a little warning. Oh and yes the consumer tech support does suck nowadays because to keep cost down they transfered most support to India. Have fun and quit calling for stupid stuff.

    1. Re:Dell Suck but unfortunately is better than most by bmantz65 · · Score: 1

      Quit calling for stupid stuff? I doubt most people who read /. call Dell to ask why their monitor won't turn on, but what if we buy a new Dell PC and its power supply catches on fire after a week? Is that stupid?

    2. Re:Dell Suck but unfortunately is better than most by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a Dell shareholder it frightens me that an idiot like you is employed there. What do you even do at Dell? You clearly can't express yourself with the written word, so I imagine it's some sort of role in the sanitation engineering department.

  98. i wouldn't say Dell is copying apple by asv108 · · Score: 1
    Lets face it, pay music services have been around for years and so have hard drive based mp3 portables. Apple was just the first to release a decent music service and an excellent small mp3 portable.

    Apple should have realized that to make any money of their music service, they needed to have a solid pc version of their service soon after the release of the mac service. How many songs have they sold so far, 10 Million was the figure at the beginning on the month. At first that figure sounds impressive but just considering royalties Apple may be left with around $3 million. I don't know how much their music service cost to develop but considering the television advertising barrage, that $3 million probably doesn't even cover the cost of the television ads for opening week.

    1. Re:i wouldn't say Dell is copying apple by Graymalkin · · Score: 1

      You should wear a t-shirt that says "I do not understand economics". Customer acquisition is expensive and time consuming. It is much cheaper to preach to the choir. Selling new products to existing customers costs you far less than trying to get new customers. By making your current customers happy and buying new products you can keep a steady income without increased costs. If your products are especially desirable this practice has the side effect of drawing in new customers, the ones that had been sitting on the fence.

      The iTMS is just such a business idea. It is designed to get people who already have a Mac to buy an iPod as well. Their Mac already has the Firewire port and software to run the iPod. All that a lot of people need is a decent excuse to pick one up. The iTMS is just such an excuse. Being able to pick up full high quality albums for $10 is a bargain compared to the retail prices you pay at Best Buy or Sam Goody. If ten million songs generates a hundred thousand iPod sales Apple makes some beaucoup cash. That isn't just $3m in profit from the music downloaded but another $12m from the sales of the iPods for $18m in profit instead of $3m.

      The same principle will also bode for the PC. The iTMS is designed to drive sales of iPods. Releasing it on the Mac first lets the profit made from those Macs cover the costs of setting up the service and expand it for use on PCs. The same plan was followed with the iPod itself. It was a Mac-only product for a while before the Windows version was released. The initial Mac release not only rewarded existing customers, making them want to remain customers, but also let the money made from those Macs cover the initial costs of the product.

      Buy an econ book.

      --
      I'm a loner Dottie, a Rebel.
    2. Re:i wouldn't say Dell is copying apple by asv108 · · Score: 1
      You should wear a t-shirt that says "I do not understand economics". Customer acquisition is expensive and time consuming

      Well assuming conservatively, that they have spent $75 million on development and marketing, they are going to have tough time getting out of the hole on this one.

      The iTMS is just such a business idea. It is designed to get people who already have a Mac to buy an iPod as well.

      This is probably the biggest flaw with any Apple strategy, every innovative software, service, and consumer item Apple sells is designed to move their computers. Instead of trying to make the most money possible with OSX, Ipods (windows ipod was released much later), iSight, etc, Apple tries to use these innovations to push their hardware. News Flash: Switching computing platforms is a pain in the ass. An extremely small percentage of consumers will switch computing platforms for a music service, ipod, etc. A very small percentage of users will buy ipod to use the itms.

      The iTMS is just such an excuse. Being able to pick up full high quality albums for $10 is a bargain

      128 kpbs DRMed AAC files are not even close to being considered high quality. When I buy music in 2003 I expect it to be of the same quality of the CD's I purchased in 1988. 128kpbs AAC is good enough to play on a computer or on an ipod with earbuds, but is nowhere near the quality of a uncompressed 44.1 CD. Why pay $10 an album for low quality, when I can buy used CD's for $8 on amazon .com and rip them to FLAC. Yes yes, for most consumers 128kpbs aac is fine, but for music collectors, audiophiles, ie the people who buy large amounts of music, the quality of itms is simply unacceptable.

      Take your Apple Fanboy Cheerleading elsewhere.

    3. Re:i wouldn't say Dell is copying apple by Graymalkin · · Score: 1

      Did you even read my reply? Your response reads like you're concentrating really hard on sticking a bowling pin up your ass and not paying any attention to anything else you're doing. Apple sells to its current customers because they can make a steady income that way. Repeat customers are good for business, new customers typically aren't because the cost of aquiring them is usually more than you make off them. While a small percentage of PC users will switch to a Mac simply to get an iPod and use iTMS a large percentage of Mac users will do just that. They already have the Mac with the needed software support. An early Christmas present later and they can take all of their music with them be it from a CD or iTMS.

      Save your "golden ears" bullshit for someone else. That argument is absolutely ridiculous. For a majority of music consumers a 128kbps AAC is more than fine, especially when the AACs from iTMS are encoded from 24-bit 48KHz masters. A 128kbps AAC is phsycoacoustically identical to the music coming off a CD. A majority of music customers are not audiophiles and do not have $2,000+ audio systems. Most people have stereos from Wal-Mart that cost less than $200 or a set of speakers on their computer that maybe set them back $30.

      How come people are Apple fan boy cheerleaders when you make retarded arguments?

      --
      I'm a loner Dottie, a Rebel.
    4. Re:i wouldn't say Dell is copying apple by gerardrj · · Score: 1

      Apple may be left with around $3 million.

      Ahh... but you miss the point. the iTMS may very well be a loss leader. How many iPods have they sold as a result of the music store? Hoe many Mac's have they sold? How many Wintel only consumers have they enticed in to the local Apple Retail Store?

      If the iTMS itself even only manages to break even, it will probably still be a major money maker for Apple.

      --
      Article X: The powers not delegated... by the Constitution...are reserved...to the people
    5. Re:i wouldn't say Dell is copying apple by asv108 · · Score: 1
      Apple sells to its current customers because they can make a steady income that way. Repeat customers are good for business, new customers typically aren't because the cost of aquiring them is usually more than you make off them.

      If IBM and GE followed your business logic, both companies would probably be out of business today. In the 1990's IBM decided to focus of the services business while in the 1980's GE added financial services, among a 1000 other markets. The fundamental problem with Apple's concentration in hardware sales is that the company has missed numerous opportunties to expand their business with their many non-computer hardware innovations.

      A 128kbps AAC is phsycoacoustically identical to the music coming off a CD.

      Any studies to back that up that lofty claim? Thought so.. Hearing is just eyesight, not all ears are the same.

      A majority of music customers are not audiophiles and do not have $2,000+ audio systems.

      This point was already covered in my previous reply, I suggest you read back a little.

      So far the only thing you have managed to showcase is a reliance on emotional personal attacks, instead of trying to provide reasonable counterpoints to my initial post. Here is a list in case you suffer from amnesia:

      • How come people are Apple fan boy cheerleaders when you make retarded arguments?
      • Save your "golden ears" bullshit for someone else.
      • Your response reads like you're concentrating really hard on sticking a bowling pin up your ass and not paying any attention to anything else you're doing
      • You should wear a t-shirt that says "I do not understand economics".
      • Buy an econ book.

      First Class form on your part, congrats.

  99. Agreed by iomud · · Score: 1

    It's not about making money selling music, it's about changing the way the system works. The ancillary benefits to itms are that Apple gets mindshare which hopefully turns into marketshare.

  100. iPod and ITMS are hardly "poorly-implemented" by gotr00t · · Score: 1
    I would say that you're right on how Dell may be good at taking poorly implemented ideas and making a better product, but look at the enormous success of the iPod and the ITunes Music Store, and you'll see that they are not poorly implemented at all, but are the standard for what a good digital music player and music download service must be.

    Dell has a much more powerful opponenet in this field than you might think.

  101. Dell sell cheap linux desktop and laptop for home by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mike please sell cheap linux desktop with redhat 9 and openoffice for 199 and see it fly.

    Same with laptop for 499 and see it fly.

  102. Agreed, terrible tech by Fubar411 · · Score: 1

    The long wait times are rough, but part of the problem is cultural. Obviously their call centers are overseas now and their people are using nicknames such as "Mark" or "Tom" to try and relate. I've had two problems on my laptop that have required hardware fixes and it has taken no less than three or four calls over a period of time to get to that point.

  103. Success. by thatguywhoiam · · Score: 4, Insightful
    You know, if you bought EXXON stock and APPLE stock when apple went public back in 1982, you'd be WAY AHEAD with EXXON!

    I don't need to look at your referenced chart. I'm sure that Exxon has some stratospheric numbers, like a lot of oil companies.

    What I'm curious about is your idea of 'success'. The idea of 'success' in Dell's culture as well, for that matter.

    I hear Michael Dell talk in interviews about the state of the industry and his predictions. What immediately strikes me is the fact that his comments are 100% economic. That is to say, all he talks about is where the money is going, essentially. He never talks about actually doing something good. You know, advancing the state of things? Never. Just money.

    So whether you think Apple is successful or not entirely depends on your worldview of success. I would submit that Apple is one of the most successful companies of all time.

    I base this not entirely on financial performance, but rather, a combination of fiscal prowess and the quality and impact of the things Apple has brought into the world. At the end of the day, what really matters in this kind of industry is the work you've done, right?

    I mean, if you really go back to the list, the list of things they've introduced to the mainstream is just staggering. The first mainstream PC. First mainstream mouse. Laser printer. Desktop GUI. Multimedia, in large part. It goes on. Of course Apple is also the crazy artist of the industry. They produce brilliant things but can be absolutely taciturn and overly sensitive and stubborn and... well you get the point. Apple is to Peter Gabriel what Michael Dell is to Garth Brooks. Or something like that.

    Dell doesn't do any meaningful work. They just box 'em up and ship 'em out. That's fine, there's a need for that, and its in a million corporate office farms. For good consumer stuff you can do much better. And when you ask Michael Dell about innovation he thinks that means branching out into areas others have been successful in already. He would, I suspect, look at you blankly if you suggested that he was copying Apple; he'd say it was just 'industry trade winds' he was following.

    Success is not just how much money you make - you can't measure it that way. It's a quality thing.

    --
    If Jesus wants me it knows where to find me.
    1. Re:Success. by Emugamer · · Score: 1

      well when was the last time you saw a computer company get another country invaded so it could have a cheaper supply? huh? in terms of seeing things happen .. oil companies are much more sucsessful in rewriting history

    2. Re:Success. by I_M_Noman · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      the list of things they've introduced to the mainstream is just staggering...[snippage]...Desktop GUI
      You say "desktop GUI" like it's a good thing.
      Apple is to Peter Gabriel what Michael Dell is to Garth Brooks. Or something like that.
      Interesting that you say that, as Peter Gabriel has been recycling the same thing for years now (cf. his last tour being almost note-for-note and choreographed-step-for-choreographed-step identical to his last one). And just what's wrong with Garth Brooks? I'm no huge country-pop fan, but that's just elitist snobbery. (Not that there's anything wrong with that, either, but I'm just saying...)
      Dell doesn't do any meaningful work. They just box 'em up and ship 'em out.
      Define "meaningful." Heck, Apple just boxes 'em up and ships 'em out too, when you get right down to it.
    3. Re:Success. by Xyd · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      "quality and impact of the things Apple has brought into the world"

      Heh. Then you cite "The first mainstream PC. First mainstream mouse. Laser printer. Desktop GUI. Multimedia" Clearly you need a clue but then I'd be willing to bet your paycheck has a piece of fruit on it.

      The marketplace needs the likes of Dell otherwise PC users would pay the price of a Mac for a PC. Further, your comparison and comments in the second-to-last paragraph just reduced all automakers excepting Ford to the likes of Dell -- they didn't invent the car, they just copy the original. Does that make them useless? Hmm... what kind of car do you drive?

      So, to your original point: Is Apple successful? Ask my eTrade account -- my holdings of AAPL are down 59.21% (over 20 months) just behind COMS (-66.46%) and PALM (just too damned dreary to even post).

      .xyd

    4. Re:Success. by lucifuge31337 · · Score: 1

      I hear Michael Dell talk in interviews about the state of the industry and his predictions. What immediately strikes me is the fact that his comments are 100% economic. That is to say, all he talks about is where the money is going, essentially. He never talks about actually doing something good. You know, advancing the state of things? Never. Just money. [...]
      Dell doesn't do any meaningful work. They just box 'em up and ship 'em out.


      Dell isn't in a position to be innovative. Their purpose it to push basically pre-made SKUs out the door after making sure they pass some basic manufacturing tests. They have made their success by being the finest spare parts distributors in the PC world.

      When the last time NAPA was innovative? Pep Boys? Right. Never. Dell holds a similar position in the PC world. There is NOTHING wrong with that. It's actually quite impressive that they've kept their focus.

      --
      Do not fold, spindle or mutilate.
    5. Re:Success. by Stu+Charlton · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I used to think Dell did meaningful work: they had high quality boxes for cheap prices. This was around 1996-97. Then Dell skyrocketed... and and I switched to a Mac.

      Your comments on success are well taken. Economists and businesspeople often view profit maximization and financial results as the end of a business, but the reality is that this is the "mode" of the business - it says nothing of what the business actually does, just the constraints that it is under (it needs to be profitable).

      At the same time, there is concern of a business' sustainability if it is not profitable enough. Apple, for example, has not been particularily profitable lately, which means while they're not decaying fast, they're still decaying in a sense: they're not covering their future costs adequately. This may change, but it is a valid concern, especially to long term buyers of Apple products and services.

      Unfortunately, the over-emphasis on quantitative measures has caused a distortion of what "success" means everywhere. Financial analysts even sometimes go so far as to scorn anyone that actually cares about what a business does instead of a dispassionate look at numbers. This ignores another reality: businesses are simultaenously social and economic institutions. One can't get rid of that social aspect (though they may try).

      --
      -Stu
    6. Re:Success. by thatguywhoiam · · Score: 1
      Dell isn't in a position to be innovative. Their purpose it to push basically pre-made SKUs out the door after making sure they pass some basic manufacturing tests. They have made their success by being the finest spare parts distributors in the PC wold.

      Who put them in that position?

      When the last time NAPA was innovative? Pep Boys? Right. Never. Dell holds a similar position in the PC world. There is NOTHING wrong with that.

      I know there's nothing wrong with that per se, from a business perspective. I just said that there's better consumer stuff. Here's what I wrote:

      Dell doesn't do any meaningful work. They just box 'em up and ship 'em out. That's fine, there's a need for that, and its in a million corporate office farms. For good consumer stuff you can do much better.

      I was simply postulating that business 'innovation' is not the same as furthering the state of the art in computing itself.

      --
      If Jesus wants me it knows where to find me.
    7. Re:Success. by thatguywhoiam · · Score: 1
      You say "desktop GUI" like it's a good thing.

      Now how am I supposed to reply to something like that? I suppose you think Vi is the ultimate interface? If you don't think the desktop GUI is 'a good thing' for most people in general... well, you just go on thinking that. I'm sure I won't sway you.

      And just what's wrong with Garth Brooks? I'm no huge country-pop fan, but that's just elitist snobbery.

      You said there was something wrong. I was very careful not to compare the two. Go read my post again. They're just different entities serving different audiences.

      --
      If Jesus wants me it knows where to find me.
    8. Re:Success. by lucifuge31337 · · Score: 1

      Who put them in that position?

      Mike Dell. And he's done very well for himself as a result.

      I know there's nothing wrong with that per se, from a business perspective. I just said that there's better consumer stuff. Here's what I wrote:
      [...]
      I was simply postulating that business 'innovation' is not the same as furthering the state of the art in computing itself.


      And I completely agree. Business rarely need cutting edge technology to solve real problems. What they need is reliable, servicable, repeatable, available (from a new equipment and parts standpoint), and compatible. So, yes, we agree.

      My point is that it doesn't make Dell a bad company. I don't really think you were trying to say that, but I'm simply adding to your point. Would I buy a Dell? Maybe. But not because it's a Dell...I'd buy one because I was looking for a piece of commodity hardware and they had the best price and availibility on what I happen to need. They have made their business based on that. While, like with all large business, you can find plenty of customers who have had bad experiences and want to disagree, on the whole, they meet price and availibility. That's how they attained their position int he industry, coming up from a hack-ass mail order clone shop.

      Looking purely at the business aspects of them, it's quite impressive. They didn't come up with the idea. Rather they waited for others to try first, let the pioneers figure out the problems and learn from them, and then they implement a better model. Now they see that everyone else is selling consumer goods along with PCs and peripherals.....PC margins are getting low. So they started out with the same program. Camcorders....probably some other things....and now portable audio players. This isn't surprising...they're following their pattern.

      I think I'm done rambling now. I must be...I ran out of coffee.

      --
      Do not fold, spindle or mutilate.
    9. Re:Success. by I_M_Noman · · Score: 1
      I suppose you think Vi is the ultimate interface?
      No idea -- I've never seen it.
      They're just different entities serving different audiences
      My point exactly.
    10. Re:Success. by truthintruth · · Score: 1

      Xyd said: [...] Heh. Then you cite "The first mainstream PC. First mainstream mouse. Laser printer. Desktop GUI. Multimedia" Clearly you need a clue" [...]

      Well, mister brilliant, if it wasn't Apple to clearly introduced the industry's first consumer (mainstream) computer, mouse, GUI desktop, laser printer, and a bunch of other things, then who was it? Let me see... oh that's right, it was Apple.

    11. Re:Success. by Xyd · · Score: 1
      Well it's been a much-argued fact that the GUI and mouse were not Apple originals, but copies shamelessly stolen from Xerox @ PARC. But, I suppose this will open yet more debate.

      As to "a bunch of other things", well I hope that on their R&D list is profitability, increasing marketshare and increasing shareholder value. Because without those three things (okay, two of three) inventing becomes an an irrelevant activity.

      Don't get me wrong -- I have an iMac on my desk and a ton of AAPL that I can't afford to sell -- I hope Apple succeeds.

      Sincerely,

      Mr. Brilliant

  104. I remember by AstroDrabb · · Score: 1

    when Dell put out some good quality stuff. Over the last few years they have change considerably. Now all they do is assemble parts made some where else, mostly outside of the USA. I also remember hearing Dell say that they support Linux. Where is that support? Will this device be supported or usably under Linux? Will it be a standard mass storage device that can mount under Linux, MS Windows and Mac without dirvers? Or did they make it proprietary? I think they are nothing more then MS's lap dog now, and would not purchase anything from them. Why won't they let me purchase a PC without an OS? They let you choose between different version of MS Windows, so why not let me choose not to have it at all and not have to pay the "MS Tax"? Oh, and I think their prices are too high. Go to their site and configure a PC or laptop, then add an extra 256MB of memory. They want $100 bucks! You can get it over the net for $25 - $45 bucks. Stay away from Dell.

    --
    If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
    it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
    1. Re:I remember by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah cause other computer companies don't overcharge for RAM **cough** Apple **cough**

      People like us who have actually opened a computer case and put RAM in think that price is a joke, but guess what, for the average luser, they are glad to pay the extra not to deal with it. Not to mention large buyers - someone buying 1000 pcs does not want to then go out and buy 1000 sticks of RAM and spend the resources to go install that.

      And you made their point for them - you can configure without the RAM, then go put it in yourself for 25-45 bucks.

  105. Sony first introduced firewire in 1995 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apple waited to introduce it like everyone else. USB didn't come along "years later" in reality.

    Apple didn't do the R&D work for the iPod. They were just another "me-too" with nice industrial design and terrible ergonomics. I gave my iPod to a mac user about a week ago and he couldn't figure out how to operate it. Anyone notice how the supplied sleeve scratches the display? I think the iPod is ripe for a slapdown. It's really not very good.

    I can assure you that Dell doesn't consider Apple one tiny bit when considering its business moves. Any market where Apple leads is not a mature one by definition.

    1. Re:Sony first introduced firewire in 1995 by MoneyT · · Score: 1

      a) Apple invented firewire first, not sony. Likewise, Apple has had support for firewire since 95. It just never kicked off until recently.

      b) You couldn't figure out how to operate an iPod? Which was the confusing part? The scroll wheel or the play, stop forward and backward buttons?

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
  106. Wierd Al? by Palverone · · Score: 1

    no matter how much I wish, I will never be able to buy any Wierd Al tracks...

    -I guess I'll just Eat It.

  107. Steve Jobs is just as much a salesman as anybody.. by freejamesbrown · · Score: 1

    He's claimed the title of "revolutionary" enough times that my stigmatism is out of control from rolling my eyes so much....

    It only seems that within the last few years have they actually started to earn that title.

    I still like eMusic way better than iTunes and it's been around for a lot longer.
    m.

  108. Re:dell sucks by thatguywhoiam · · Score: 1
    Anyhow, here's the real spin here: Apple fucked up, and now they're going to pay.

    I'd agree with you were it not for the fact that the Apple service is weeks, not months, away... and the timeframe will be so close that it's moot from a marketing perspective. So I don't think they've fucked up quite yet.

    --
    If Jesus wants me it knows where to find me.
  109. Anyone else notice by dave1212 · · Score: 1

    the scroll-bar thing they had to use in place of something actually usable like the (oops, patented) scroll wheel on the iPod?

    You would end up with your finger or thumb just flicking wildly at it.. and looking somewhat psycho, stroking your little grey box madly.

    It seems like some sort of resistant slider (like the ones on MIDI keyboards) would work for scrolling much better.

  110. Think about it by tetrahedrassface · · Score: 0
    Rant on

    Okay we all are probably smart enough to know what we want in a home system and then build it. The average Joe sixpack thinks that companies like Dell are the greatest however. Trust me i know..The Truth is that people just mind paying for songs. The problem are greedy labels, and spoiled stars living lives of decadence and excess...When will people learn????? I know "-4 meanspirited"

  111. Re:Dell sell cheap linux desktop and laptop for ho by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and piss off microsoft?

  112. What's really funny... by artemis67 · · Score: 1

    is that, in 2001, Michael Dell told BusinessWeek that Apple should liquidate all of thir assets and close down shop.

    Like most of the big name Wintel companies, they love to take their cheap shots at Apple while shamelessly plundering Apple's ideas.

  113. Get it straight! by dieman · · Score: 1

    Apple is a nitch player. Dell is joining *Gateway* in consumer electronics.

    --
    -- dieman - Scott Dier
  114. We're being hasty by Hagen · · Score: 1

    Dell has merely announced that they will release a portable music player and an internet music service. I can't find details on them anywhere. Until I see details on the capabilities and standards for both of them, I'm reserving judgement.

    Plus, if Apple gets the iTunes for Windows stuff out in October as rumored, then Dell may still appear behind the times once they actually ship product.

  115. Dell inovating or just re-selling MS technology? by danieleran · · Score: 1

    Dell has no history at creating new categories of hardware products or innovative, smart software.

    Apple is an R&D lab that also makes hardware. Lately they've gotten all high fashion with their packaging and fit and finish. The new Powerbooks and the G5 are as high-end looking, feeling and functioning as any ultra high end electronics brand or luxury car.

    Dell just handles the assembly and marketing of Walmart grade Windows PCs. They half-assedly slapped somebody else's Linux on a few boxes for a while. They pooped out a WinCE device as exciting as Gateway's. Big Whoop!

    I've purchased and supported over a 100 Dell laptops. They are serviceable but nothing special. And after a year they fall apart.

    Dell trying to brand themselves as a Brand (in TVs, handhelds and now music players) is laughable. I'm a geek but I'd be embarrased to have the Dell name on anything I owned that wasn't a bland (IT department issued) PC or laptop.

    Imagine Ford introducing a supersport motorbike. Yawn.

  116. Re: iMusic - Mac only by King_TJ · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Actually, I believe it was a combination of the two. I saw a few recording industry quotes where they made it fairly clear that the only reason they gave Apple the go-ahead to sell their music online was because the limited market-share of Apple Mac users made a perfect trial audience. If something went horribly wrong and the public hated it, they could save face by knowing 95% of the public never used the service to begin with. It could easily be brushed aside as a failure only because PC/Windows users didn't get a chance to be a part of the program.

    Once it was proven to work (and sell well), Apple was free to go ahead with developing a PC version of the music store without record company backlash.

  117. The iPod's controls suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where's the on-off button? Where's the back button? Why do I have to spin my finger in such a big circle just to scroll up and down? Why is scrolling so erratic? The iPod's controls are a POS.

    1. Re:The iPod's controls suck by MoneyT · · Score: 1

      Any key press will turn the iPod on.

      If one reads the instructions, holding the pause button will turn the iPod off. Also, leaving it paused or stopped for 3 minutes will turn the iPod off.

      The back button would be the one that looks like a back arrow. Unless you mean moving backwards through the menus, in which case you would hit the menu button.

      Scrolling was done with a wheel because that can also double as a volume control and so that you can have a relative scrolling speed as opposed to a single speed.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
  118. It was 1997. by Xenex · · Score: 2, Informative
    Thank you As the Apple Turns!
    "...in 2001, Michael Dell told BusinessWeek that Apple should liquidate all of thir assets and close down shop."
    It was actually 1997. Apple of 1997 was a very different company than Apple of 2001. In 1997, Jobs has just taken back power, and the iMac had yet to be released...
  119. Dell invented the SIMM and co-invented the DIMM... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...so you can thank Dell for the memory you find in machine available today. Dell introduced the first small form factor PC ISA PC's. It pioneered riser cards that enabled the lower profiles you have today. It was the first to introduce a 12MHz 286, the first 16MHz 286, and the first 20MHz 286. It was the first to make the transition to an all-386 product line, then the first to and all-486 line, and the first to an all-Pentium line. Dell drove the industry consistently torwards higher performance and lower prices.

    At one time Dell had the industries most compatible SVR4 and bankrolled the early x86 port of X11 that eventually became XFree86. Dell employed one of the maintainers of the x86 gcc port who made valuable contributions to that compiler. Dell also provides funds for Linux development efforts.

    Dell's patent portfolio is surprisingly large as well. What do you know about Dell's R&D or anything else for that matter? Dell didn't achieve its success by pure luck. In the early days Dell employed some of the industry's brightest people. Ask Compaq how formidable a competitor Dell is if you can still find them.

  120. does it matter? by mnemonic_ · · Score: 1

    The buttons may look "cheap", but I'm sure they still "just work".

    1. Re:does it matter? by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      The buttons may look "cheap", but I'm sure they still "just work".

      Until the day after the warranty runs out?

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
  121. Michael Dell hasn't thought of Apple in 20 years. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He could care less about 5% marketshare.

    Apple didn't pioneer mp3 players or online music stores. If Dell copied anybody it wasn't Apple.

  122. computer cooling by mnemonic_ · · Score: 1

    Dell R&D developed a very quiet processor cooling system using a ducted low-RPM fan, dedicated to the processor. The sound is very close to silent. They developed the first heat pipe cooling solution for laptop processors as well.

    1. Re:computer cooling by cosmo7 · · Score: 1

      No, you're confusing "developing" with "watching someone else developing". Dell never invented anything; Sandia Labs invented the heat pipe.

      And Dell's magnificent R&D spent some time trying to get their fans to be a bit quieter? That's really the best you can come up with?

  123. Dell's new player by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Personally, I had the very worst expectations for this announcement. I pictured a rejected and bulky Archos unit that Dell would slap their name on. Compared to what I was thinking, this isn't too bad. 15GB player, has voice recording, scroll wheel for navigation. I can live with that.

    However, I could really care less about what you think of the player. Whether you think the iPod is better or whether you plan to get this, I don't care to hear the debate.

    What I'm more interested in is the fact that Dell is behind the player. They have a proven record of releasing products at prices that undercut those currently on the market (see Axim). If anything, the new Dell player will be released at a price much lower than current players, which will cause all other makers to drop their prices and match.

    And that will be a good thing for everyone, whether a Dell or Apple fan.

  124. WAY TO GET BITCHSLAPPED BY MOD_REWRITE THERE CHIEF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  125. Re:Compared to Apple's own by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you get so much done, why are you at it for such large periods of time?

    I've never watched a mac user demonstrate that he could do anything faster on his mac.

  126. Why not an Apple PC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You'd think that, perhaps, seeing how the entire PC world simply copies Apple's every move, Apple itself may as well just hop into the PC world and destroy the competition. But there's that whole pesky thing about not controlling the hardware....

    1. Re:Why not an Apple PC? by TheInternet · · Score: 1

      But there's that whole pesky thing about not controlling the hardware....

      I think you're missing the reason Apple is in the computer business to begin with.

      - Scott

      --
      Scott Stevenson
      Tree House Ideas
  127. Re:Compared to Apple's own by MoneyT · · Score: 1

    Try creating a new folder on the desktop. And do it with the left button.

    --
    T Money
    World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
  128. Re:Compared to Apple's own by stratjakt · · Score: 1

    Can I have your job?

    I have to write and debug code all day. I want the "making folders on desktop with left mouse button" job. I'm sure you're very productive, I bet you got a billion folders there by now!

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  129. bravo by pimpinmonk · · Score: 1

    I never would have guessed Dell to do this, but it makes so much sense to me. They're the success story in the PC world, and when I read this announcement I was just like "ah ha! brilliant!"

    Not to say I think they'll succeed, the product will be perfect, etc., but just thinking about it, Dell seems like the company with the greatest chance of pulling this off to me, and perhaps could be a stepping stone toward more apple-like PC products in the future (Linux R&D to get things working on the newest hardware, anyone?)

  130. Re:Compared to Apple's own by MoneyT · · Score: 1

    Consider though, there are plenty of very small things in windows that take one extra step to do that you don't have to do in a mac. Those extra steps add up over time, so while an individual task like writing a paper may not be any faster, the inbetween steps are.

    --
    T Money
    World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
  131. Re:dell sucks by vonFinkelstien · · Score: 1
    You wrote: "Dell has become an enormously wealthy company because they're good at taking other people's well-concieved-yet-poorly-implemented ideas and improving on them or making them easier to sell.
    ...
    Anyhow, here's the real spin here: Apple fucked up, and now they're going to pay."

    The iPod and iTMS are the most well-conceived and PROPERLY implemented ideas I've seen coming out of a computer company.

    The mods screwed up rating you insightful. You last line shows that you are really a troll using a true (usually--just not in this case) statement to get Macheads enraged.

    Go ahead and try to use the Dell DJ and DMS. I'm sure they will be anything but easy to use compared to the iPod and iTMS.

  132. Wrong by s.fontinalis · · Score: 1

    They adapted the direct sell model to the national market - in the old days, and even now, there are stores where you can walk in, configure a PC, and pick it up a couple of days later. Dell adapted this idea (which had existed since the dawn of the computer) to a wider audience

  133. Best Quote on the Design of Dell's Digital Jukebox by Nova+Express · · Score: 1

    From As The Apple Turns:

    "The two devices are targeted at different markets: whereas the iPod is obviously meant to appeal to consumers with an appreciation for engineering, design, and style, the Digital Jukebox is for sewer-dwelling CHUDs with a taste for human flesh."

    --
    Lawrence Person (lawrencepersonh@gmailh.com (remove all "h"s to mail)

    http://www.lawrenceperson.com/

  134. Wrong! by ssstraub · · Score: 1

    Um, whether you call from small business, large business, premier, etc, does not matter! We buy Dells on the order of a couple hundred PER YEAR and we still get people in india when we call tech support!

    It's been so bad that we recently opened a dialog with our "specialist" to get them to shape up...

    1. Re:Wrong! by maddskillz · · Score: 1

      I don't get put through to India though. My friend is an administrator for a mid sized company and he does have to deal with India, but I don't. It might be because we are government, I don't know

    2. Re:Wrong! by ssstraub · · Score: 1

      Interesting... I wouldn't be surprised if government status gets you non-Indian support.

  135. Re:Dell invented the SIMM and co-invented the DIMM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And which of the SIMM architectures would you be talking about?...fast page mode (FPM) DRAM, Extended Data Out DRAM (EDO), Burst EDO (BEDO), Synchronous DRAM (SDRAM), GRAM (synchronous graphics RAM), EDRAM (enhanced DRAM), CDRAM (cache DRAM), MDRAM (multibank DRAM) and RAMBus?

    Ok, so they wre the first to package the latest and greatest from Intel. BFD.

  136. Joining apple? by cosyne · · Score: 1

    Computers, mp3 players.... all they need now is a BSD based OS to ship on their machines.

  137. It is still the wrong business model by Raw+Ostrich · · Score: 1
    You can not make money by being the supply channel at the internet age. These commercial supply channels will disappear as the first successfull productions launches/bids happen.

    All you need is a bidding system, offered by eBay or PayPal or the like. Artist the supplies a few samples of his new production and offers a full, free release if a certain sum of compensations is raised, say 10 million.

    The bid organiser then takes binding bid-offers from the audience, say at 10 dollars each. Once the 10 million total is reached, the production gets released free for all. If the 10 million total is not reached, all bids are canseled and no-one loses a dime.

  138. Customization built by NeXT by TheInternet · · Score: 1

    How many major PC makers did PC advanced PC customization before Dell, where you pick exactly what components you want from Monitor to Video Card to Speakers?

    The irony, of course, is that folks from NeXT (now Apple) built the web application that allowed Dell to offer online customization to its customers. Eventually, Microsoft talked them out of using WebObjects for political reasons.

    But I believe the point was that Dell hasn't contributed much in terms of advancing the idea of what a computer is. They're just putting it together in different ways. Apple is a creator, Dell is an assembler. That's not necessarily good or bad, unless Dell gets undue credit for being a creator.

    - Scott

    --
    Scott Stevenson
    Tree House Ideas
    1. Re:Customization built by NeXT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please provide proof of this. I know that MS wanted the Dell site to run on IIS rather than Apache but that had nothing to do with NeXT.

    2. Re:Customization built by NeXT by JasonAsbahr · · Score: 1

      I'm not the original poster and I don't have proof other than my memory, but at the time I was working writing WebObjects applications for other clients and Dell was one of the sites we would point to. Check out the funky WebObject URLs when you surf the Apple store, they were on Dell.com first.

      This is back when NeXT was selling OpenStep for NT, the "YellowBox" technology that provided Objective C, the base AppKit classes, Enterprise Object Foundation (OO-DB stuff), and a windowing system that worked rootless. It was damn sweet and a damn shame they let that wither after the Apple purchase/takeover. Ah well.

      Rumor had it that Microsoft threw dozens of free programmers to work for months to get the Dell store converted over, while the original WebObjects team was around half a dozen guys.

    3. Re:Customization built by NeXT by TheInternet · · Score: 1

      Please provide proof of this. I know that MS wanted the Dell site to run on IIS rather than Apache but that had nothing to do with NeXT.

      It's common knowledge. Google for "Dell site WebObjects" and you'll get a lot of stuff like this:

      "Hancock paraded the successes of The Sharper Image and Dell, two companies using WebObjects for HTML and database management. The Dell site may be proof of WebObjects success - CEO Michael Dell said earlier in the day that the site is pulling in US$500 million in online sales. "

      I guess the fact that you don't believe me means Microsoft did a pretty good job of erasing history. :)

      - Scott

      --
      Scott Stevenson
      Tree House Ideas
  139. Inoperable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Inoperable is a word, I think that's what he meant.

    but, yes I have to agree, wouldn't it be nice if people took a few seconds to re-read their posts. Loose is another commonly abused word round here.

  140. Well, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe the problem is that the Mac doesn't have the right mouse button, so you're inept with a proper mouse?

    1. Re:Well, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ever buy a mouse with a fucking scroll weel? Guess what, they work on macs too.

    2. Re:Well, by MoneyT · · Score: 1

      Nope, I own a nice two button scroll mouse that I use with my mac when I need or want to, however, I am also quite proficient at using only one button and the keyboard as well. Likewise, I can also do many tasks with just the keyboard alone. So no, it isn't because I don't know how to use a multibutton mouse.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
  141. Hopefully it WILL affect Apple. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As in, bringing the expoitive pricing of the iPod down. Sorry, their pricing has remained too high for too long.

    With competition they will hopefully be forced to reduce pricing (I already have one, its friends I am trying to convince to buy one who would benefit)

  142. Apple didn't invent FireWire... by DerProfi · · Score: 1

    "Who Invented FireWire"
    From the book "FireWire Filmmaking" by Scott Smith.

    "Although technically Apple is the legal guardian of this closely protected property, six of the eight key patents issued for FireWire technology cite Michael D. Jonas Teener as the chief architect responsible for their advancements. In fact, when Teener left National Semiconductor in 1986 to join Apple Computer, he had already begun early efforts on a low-cost technology to connect hard drives to one another."

    "Working nights and weekends on his pet project, Teener became the founding chair and editor of the international standard (IEEE-1394), a blueprint for the exchange of high-bandwidth digital audio. He was also instrumental in recruiting ideas from other innovators and in expanding the ambitions of the multimedia technology to include video streaming."

    "As the technical lead during the years when Apple was suffering through layoffs and dozens of threatened cancellations, Teener had to fight to keep the FireWire project alive for nearly a decade. When Steve Jobs returned to Apple in 1996, Teener urged him to implement the technology on all Macintosh computers, essentially kick-starting the desktop video revolution."

    --

    3000+ comments meta-modded. 0 mod points awarded.
    Lesson for other meta-suckers: Don't believe the hype!
  143. Yup, Compaq had thousands of innovations... by DerProfi · · Score: 1

    but that didn't amount to squat in terms of the company's long-term viability and market share, did it?

    Compaq had to get bought out by HP just to survive, and I wouldn't be surprised if Dell completely forces them out of the desktop market in the next couple of years.

    --

    3000+ comments meta-modded. 0 mod points awarded.
    Lesson for other meta-suckers: Don't believe the hype!
    1. Re:Yup, Compaq had thousands of innovations... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, exactly. Dell innovates enough for the business it is in. More innovation, like Compaq, won't make Dell more competitive. All the style and ID "innovation" at Apple isn't lifting it out of single-digit market share. Michael Dell is an ordinary guy, a lover of computers and technology, and is more computer savvy than the bulk of the /. readership. He also happens to be peerless businessman whose company kicks serious butt.

  144. You're just pissed that Dell DJ will cost half by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what you paid for your precious iPod. Get over it, dork.

  145. You are without a doubt... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the biggest pussy I've seen on Slashdot in the past 2 weeks.

    Are you even out of elementary school?

  146. Sony resurrected 1394 when it introduced DV... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...prior to that firewire was dead in the water.

    It took Sony intergrating 1394 into its camcorders to establish 1394 and justify it use in PC's. Doesn't say much for Apple innovation.

    And no, it was a friend and mac user who couldn't figure out how to use the iPod, not me. I also explained the problems. Non-obvious ways of navigating the menus and lack of an off button. The new touch-sensitive suck, btw, as does the huge, barely functional "scroll wheel".

  147. What about the /old/ DAR? by caudron · · Score: 1

    What about the Dell Digital Audio Reciever I bought years ago? They forgot that product like bad date. Now I'm stuck with a product that has buttons on the remote for features they never delivered!

    I think I'll get my next DAR from someone who will support the product. Sure, the product is nicely made, and the open source community has rallied behind it, but it would be nice if the company that made it would at least deliver the things they promised about it. now they want us to buy into another one?

    -Tom

    --
    -Tom
  148. Apple didn't kickstart the video revolution either by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Firewire cards have been available for PC's as long as they've been available, and Apple is a relative newcomer to the market with FCP, a product they bought through acquisition. Prior to the acquisition, that technology was Windows NT-based.

    Before DV and firewire, video editing products were distributed among SGI, mac, amiga, and PC. While mac had a healthy share, the products were low volume and expensive. By the time DV and firewire were on the scene, development had shifted heavily over to NT. If Apple hadn't began its program of acquisitions it would have been excluded entirely from the "desktop video revolution". Make no mistake, it was Sony that gave us firewire, only they called it iLink and 1394.

  149. A USB2 interface will work with all USB PC's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    HArdly limiting.

  150. yes, they do exist but hardly intuitive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Doesn't say much for Apple's famed ease-of-use when you have to read the manual to learn how to turn it off.

    Toggle switches offer the same capabilities as the wheel---variable speed and the (wow) ability to double as a volume control.

    The point isn't that it can't be operated but that the user is burdened with figuring it out. This was done simply for style which is, in reality, all Apple's about. They aren't really about ease-of-use, they just say they are.

    1. Re:yes, they do exist but hardly intuitive by MoneyT · · Score: 1

      The only thing difficult to figre out is the off switch, everything else makes perfect sense. Yes, toggles do offer the variable speed and volume control, however, a togle is still limited to a maximum speed where as the scroll wheel is only limited by the user's ability to move quickly and by the processor on the iPod

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
  151. Re:Dell invented the SIMM and co-invented the DIMM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dell invented the first 8-bit and parity DRAM modules and donated them to the industry so that all machines would have convenient, interoperable memory. It then worked to establish a consortium and codeveloped the 32-bit DIMM with IBM. Dell's work with memory modules grandfathers all DIMM's today and Dell in actively involved in memory technology, including RAMBUS, like it or not.

    As Intel's number one customer, Dell has great influence of Intel motherboards and chipsets and provides a critical service to Intel in helping with their specification, development and testing. Many of the systems you kids run have Dell engineering in them where the name is on it or not.

    A company the size of Dell cannot get by without an engineering team. They'd be killed by their competitors, screwed by their suppliers and litigated to death by patent holders. I'd venture to say Dell's engineering staff is easily the size of Apple's. The fact that Dell desires to offer conservative products is a reflection of their size, business sense, and customer base. You all too easily confuse flash with substance.

  152. Dell's OEM power, like IE v. Mozilla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sure, Apple may have superior hardware and software, but Dell sells the PC's to the general public. Similar to the browser battle...Netscape faded away, Mozilla is IMHO the best browser available, but because IE is right there on the desktop when Joe User buys the computer, it instantly holds a dominant market share.

    As much as I would like to see iTMS dominate the PC market as well, it will be an uphill battle to get onto the average users' desktop.

  153. No service in Canada? by axxackall · · Score: 1
    How about Canada? No service yet? I'd like to buy music in Canada, but Apple doesn't let me doing that. If Dell will open Canadian music store online (or let Canadian resident to buy from the American one) that will be excelent.

    By the way, and if Dell online music store will be OS neutral (buy it from the browser, not from any propriteray player!) that will be even better. I'd like to buy music from Linux and for Linux :)

    --

    Less is more !
  154. for all we know what if Apple and Dell are.... by bladeohlsson · · Score: 1

    working together on the master plan!

    --
    http://www.ohlssonvox.com
  155. AMEN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject header.

  156. Competition by Theaetetus · · Score: 1
    It looks like there will be some interesting competition by the end of the year. That's never a bad thing for consumers as far as I can see.

    Actually, in certain areas, media being one of them, competition can be a bad thing for consumers. In particular, it matters in the standards ring. DVD-A and SACD haven't caught on at all because they're still fighting with each other - if the industry ever stabilizes on one, they could take off. Sirius and XM are killing each other, again because a consumer has to choose when they buy a receiver which one they want to receive... and thus, which one will be around in 5 years. HDTV suffered from that for quite a while, too. So did VHS vs Beta. Once standards are finalized, competition is great, but only after those standards are set.

    -T

  157. Re:Apple didn't kickstart the video revolution eit by Theaetetus · · Score: 1
    Firewire cards have been available for PC's as long as they've been available, and Apple is a relative newcomer to the market with FCP, a product they bought through acquisition. Prior to the acquisition, that technology was Windows NT-based.

    [cough] Avid?

    Avid MediaExpress, Media100, etc. were Mac-based long before they were ported to PC environments.

    Also, Sony called Firewire iLink because Apple hadn't released the name. Now they have, and now it's known as Firewire.

    Incidentally, Sony, Apple, and Yahama, and a whole bunch of others, are now on the 1394ta board, pushing, among other things, Firewire 800 and new standards for audio and video over Firewire in the isochronous section of the data bursts. Very sweet technology.

    -T

  158. baka by lowmagnet · · Score: 1

    Henry Ford didn't invent the automobile.

    --
    Heute die Welt, morgen das Sonnensystem!