Slashdot Mirror


Photographing Exploding Edibles

Isaac Skibinski writes "Remember gawking at photos of bullets going through apples (and the pretty fruit gibbage)? We've recently built an apparatus to capture similar results, using a BASIC controller stamp, a disposable camera flash, an air compressor, an electronic sprinkler valve and some pipe. Considering the cost of the device, it has allowed us to take suprisingly crisp photos of high-velocity objects."

252 comments

  1. Once again by CGP314 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Considering the cost of the device, it has allowed us to take suprisingly crisp photos of high-velocity objects.

    Funding for this research was provided by porn co.


    --
    In London? Need a Physics Tutor?

    American Weblog in London

    1. Re:Once again by Marco_polo · · Score: 2, Funny

      My GF pointed out in a mag she was reading - During Ejaculation, it exits at ~128mph.

      wheeeeee!!!!

      --
      I am the lord of the pun. Dance Knave!
    2. Re:Once again by CGP314 · · Score: 1, Funny

      My GF pointed out in a mag she was reading - During Ejaculation, it exits at ~128mph.

      What's it? Your girlfriend? : P


      --
      In London? Need a Physics Tutor?

      American Weblog in London

    3. Re:Once again by francium+de+neobie · · Score: 0

      Nah, it was a fragment of the condom

    4. Re:Once again by HiQ · · Score: 1, Funny

      Your GF is reading a magazine while you ejaculate? You must be doing something wrong there!

    5. Re:Once again by Anixamander · · Score: 3, Funny

      Actually, it leaves the man at a much slower speed. 128mph is the speed it leaves the woman's mouth.

      Cheers.

      --
      Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball(TM)
    6. Re:Once again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OMG I am so in need of a physics tutor... Let me get my plane ticket organized and I'll be right over. Thank the Lord above you didn't put that in a .sig or I might have missed it! Plus, reading your weblog has brought the utmost pleasure to my poor starved eyes. To think that I may have never heard tale of it if you had placed it where it belonged, in the signature area. Kudos to you, my good man, for assaulting the eyes with your wonderful advertising technique!

    7. Re:Once again by CGP314 · · Score: 1

      Don't like it? Mod me down. No one else seems to.

  2. And I wonder... by Lobsang · · Score: 4, Funny

    How many times he heard his mom screaming "STOP PLAYING WITH THE FOOD!"

    1. Re:And I wonder... by quigonn · · Score: 1, Funny

      "Calm down, mom, it's for science^Wbeing slashdotted"

      --
      A monkey is doing the real work for me.
    2. Re:And I wonder... by normandr · · Score: 1

      Shouldn't these people be working on their thesis instead? :)

    3. Re:And I wonder... by Threni · · Score: 0

      "Mum..come here a minute...sit here....no, here...."

    4. Re:And I wonder... by wik · · Score: 1

      My mom was pleased when we figured out a way to clean off our kitchen counter:

      http://www.rabidpenguin.org/gb.html

      The fourth annual one is currently being prepped for removal.

      --
      / \
      \ / ASCII ribbon campaign for peace
      x
      / \
  3. Bandwidth to spare? by kidgenius · · Score: 3, Funny

    If you want any of these pictures in a larger format, take a look here You really are just begging and pleading for a ./ing aren't you?

    1. Re:Bandwidth to spare? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      If dotslashing is really what anyone wants.

    2. Re:Bandwidth to spare? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    3. Re:Bandwidth to spare? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      its MIT you idiot I highly doubt they will go down simply because you think the slashdot community has the power of god

    4. Re:Bandwidth to spare? by KFK2 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Would be funny if it wasn't MIT's bandwidth as well...

    5. Re:Bandwidth to spare? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I hear that MIT is really hurting for bandwidth these days... NOT!

    6. Re:Bandwidth to spare? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MIT could have all the bandwidth in the world, but if this is served off of some dorm computer, it's going down.

    7. Re:Bandwidth to spare? by dorlthed · · Score: 1

      It isn't. I doubt they would resolve 'web.mit.edu' to an IP address on their dorm network.

  4. "Images in science" by MrSpiff · · Score: 5, Informative

    there are similar highspeed captures and a lot more fantastic photography and articles in this book from the swedish Karolinska Institute (http://www.imagesinscience.com) sadly only available from http://kup.ki.se/publications/images_sciences_en.h tml

    1. Re:"Images in science" by aheath · · Score: 5, Informative

      The photograph of the apple and the bullet is the work of Harold E. "Doc" Edgerton. "By synchronizing strobe flashes with the motion being examined (for example, the spinning of engine rotors), then taking a series of photos through an open shutter at the rate of many flashes per second, Edgerton invented ultra-high-speed and stop-action photography (1931)." See Exploring the Art and Science of Stopping Time for more information on Harold Edgerton's life and work.

    2. Re:"Images in science" by Cyclotron_Boy · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I also took a lot of pictures of Exploding Apples. However, where this kid used a pneumatic gun and a flash camera, we used large pulses of current. In peak shots, we exceeded 2GW through the apples. Needless to say, they didn't make it.
      The biggest difference between our methods, though, is the flash. Nails hitting the apples didn't produce any light, so he wouldn't get an image. We sat with the shutter open in a dark room as well, but all of our shots were simply lit by the light from the explosion. Note how the apples seem to be lit from within... Spooky. Here's a gallery of the various experiments in our HV lab.
      -F

    3. Re:"Images in science" by iabervon · · Score: 1

      I found it a bit ironic that neither the page nor the slashdot article mentions that they're at MIT (or, at least, the page is, and I'd guess the people are, too), which is where Doc Edgerton (whose first name was only discovered after his death) worked. Furthermore, Doc's photo isn't even hosted at MIT, but rather at Stanford.

    4. Re:"Images in science" by rpi1995 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I once went to a fabulous exhibit of his work, and it really covered an amazing range of subjects. People kicking footballs (interesting deformations), hitting golf balls, bursting balloons, and of course, shooting fruit and playing cards.

      One of the most interesting things was research into nighttime arial photography of germany during the war. He was an expert on high power flashes, and that was part of the project. Didn't work because it wound up lighting up the whole sky, and giving it all away.

      The best quote was when someone came into his lab to ask if they had a deck of playing cards to lend out. His answer was "Nope, shot 'em all up."

    5. Re:"Images in science" by jafac · · Score: 1

      Invented?

      Can you say - Mueybridge? Like, 100 years ago?

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  5. Man.... by Em+Emalb · · Score: 5, Funny

    A button is hit, telling the micro-controller to open the valve, thus releasing the pressure and sending the waiting bolt hurdling forth at around 150 m/sec

    His ping times suck!

    --
    Sent from your iPad.
  6. Easy to do using a sound-trigger by vijayiyer · · Score: 5, Informative

    There is a lot of information on building a sound-triggered system at http://www.hiviz.com/, along with some photos.

  7. Exploding Fruit by sboyko · · Score: 4, Funny

    There's got to be a research project in here somewhere... "Citrus Fruits and Their Implosion Properties". Maybe Apple would sponsor it.

    --
    SCO, Microsoft, P2P, what's your hot button?
    1. Re:Exploding Fruit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seeing as apples aren't citrus fruits, mayhap a title change is in order?

    2. Re:Exploding Fruit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only intersting if they to it to a brand new G5!

    3. Re:Exploding Fruit by sboyko · · Score: 1

      It was meant to be ironic. :)

      --
      SCO, Microsoft, P2P, what's your hot button?
    4. Re:Exploding Fruit by zcat_NZ · · Score: 3, Funny

      Citrus fruits? Now you're comparing apples with oranges!

      --
      455fe10422ca29c4933f95052b792ab2
    5. Re:Exploding Fruit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You shot for ironic, but hit stupid dead in the head, Fred.

  8. Not so bad by CGP314 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    don't sit too close to the end of the barrel, like Isaac did.

    That's not so bad. The real Isaac stuck a knife in his eye just to see what would happen.


    --
    In London? Need a Physics Tutor?

    American Weblog in London

    1. Re:Not so bad by GeekDork · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The real Isaac

      Is it bad that my first thought was "Newton or Asimov"?

      --

      Fight hunger. Filet a politician and send him to a 3rd world country of your choice.

    2. Re:Not so bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The real Isaac stuck a knife in his eye just to see what would happen.

      LOL, I imagine he wouldn't be doing a lot of "seeing" after that

    3. Re:Not so bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously though,
      How can you look up to a guy who tries 'see what happends' if you poke a knife your eye? (quite literaly)

      "Dear diary; I tried to taste a knife.
      The results were of a reddish sensation, but I couldn't quite place the perticular salty taste.
      Tomorrow I shall examine the effects of bringing one's finger into one's ear to see if the senses are inter-exchangeable.
      Maybe I really should give up my ambition as a biologist if my experiment fails."

    4. Re:Not so bad by nlindstrom · · Score: 1

      Sheesh, people. Go read Quicksilver by Neal Stephenson.

  9. Sounds like by Orion442 · · Score: 5, Funny

    using a BASIC controller stamp, a disposable camera flash, an air compressor, an electronic sprinkler valve and some pipe

    MacGyver got a new hobby....but where's the duct tape???

    1. Re:Sounds like by GeekWade · · Score: 0

      No, but he did do the next best thing by using all that speaker cable. Or is it lamp cord? A true, uhm, pro.

      In highschool I had an old Ford(Mazda) Courior Pickup and it had plastic ball joints in the throttle linkage. One fine day as I was driving out in the boonies the plastic gives way and I have to find something to fix it with. Well, I had to drive back home listening to the left channel only, but the truck made it another 100k miles on speaker cable wrapped throttle linkage...

      -Wade

  10. I'm curious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wouldn't it be amusing to take one of these films of a modern CD drive shattering an early 1990s era CD rom with poor balancing? ;-)

  11. Heh. by digitalchinky · · Score: 1

    And I thought my circuit boards hacks were messy!

  12. Bless you! by Bish.dk · · Score: 2, Funny
  13. Great. by benlinkknilneb · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Just in case I ever wanted to know how to take a picture of exploding fruit... just the kind of thing I've always wondered how to do.

    Seriously, it IS pretty cool though.

    --
    It must be Thursday... I never could get the hang of Thursdays.
    1. Re:Great. by SuperMo0 · · Score: 1

      But there are other things that move really fast that you might want to take pictures of, such as sneezes.

    2. Re:Great. by UrgleHoth · · Score: 0

      Sneezes, eh?
      For the timing, what do you use instead of a bolt gun? a pepper gun?

      --

      Dogma - "let's just say we'd like to avoid any empirical entanglements."
  14. Nail Gun by DRUNK_BEAR · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They are using a nail gun in what seems to be a garage or a basement... I wonder if they ever considered what would happen if the shot would miss the carpet they put behind.. to put it in their own words, the bolt could "go across the room, bounce off of various objects, and become swiftly lodged into our soft brains".

    For better security, I would suggest automating the whole process a bit further, get out of the room and see the results when done... but may be I'm just paranoid...

    --
    DrkBr
    1. Re:Nail Gun by fuzzybunny · · Score: 1, Funny

      ...to put it in their own words, the bolt could "go across the room, bounce off of various objects, and become swiftly lodged into our soft brains".

      Sure, but they'd have a perfect photo of it!

      --
      Cole's Law: Thinly sliced cabbage
    2. Re:Nail Gun by Dorf+on+Perl · · Score: 1

      but may be I'm just paranoid...

      Probably. Remember, whatever doesn't kill you makes you stranger.

    3. Re:Nail Gun by bbowers · · Score: 1

      O_o hmmm I've had a couple experiences that people say I'm lucky to be alive. I guess thats why my friends say "I keep telling myself my friends are normal..." When they see something I've done.

      But back on subject, there was an episode of Myth Busters where they tried the myth of dropping a penny off of a tall building, to see if it in fact would kill someone if they were hit by it. This was done with a specially fitted barrell on a gun that would fire a blank and expel the pennie toward a flesh target (not human of course). Even at an extremely high velocity the penny would not even break the skin strangely enough, I believe at the speed of a bullet but I can't be sure. Interesting either way, these pictures just reminded me of it. But wheres the test on the water mellon? *grin*

      --
      Even a stopped clock gives the right time twice a day.
    4. Re:Nail Gun by Cthefuture · · Score: 1

      For better security, I would suggest automating the whole process a bit further, get out of the room and see the results when done... but may be I'm just paranoid...

      Pffft, and you're the kind that never played with fireworks, right? "Safe" is relative and if you're careful you can push the boundaries.

      Getting in your car and riding around is more dangerous since you're trusting other morons not to kill you.

      --
      The ratio of people to cake is too big
    5. Re:Nail Gun by mangu · · Score: 1
      Even at an extremely high velocity the penny would not even break the skin


      Sounds really strange. If the speed is high enough, the penny should break through anything. But I don't believe a penny dropped from any height will kill someone. It's so lightweight it will reach terminal velocity, due to air resistance, before it has enough energy to do much harm.

      In World War I they tried dropping pointed steel bolts from airplanes over enemy troops, but they realized soon that it was much more effective to drop the same weight of explosives, in the form of bombs.

    6. Re:Nail Gun by DRUNK_BEAR · · Score: 1

      I agree with your point. I am the type who believes that life is too short to wait for something bad to happen to you. But I must add that I'm just not the type who would like to be candidate for a Darwin Award, that's all.

      On the other hand, if I die because of risks I take (e.g. paragliding, rock climbing), then it will have been worth it. But I don't want to end my life or give myself a hard time when I should have known better than shooting nails around wearing only goggles.

      But I still agree with your point.

      --
      DrkBr
    7. Re:Nail Gun by Chewie · · Score: 1

      Well, since terminal velocity is only the maximum speed it will achieve in freefall, you could exceed it. If you built something of rail gun magnitude that fired a penny, it would certainly break skin near the barrel (of course, given the speeds involved "near the barrel" could be quite a ways away, depending on friction with the air). It would eventually slow down to terminal velocity by friction with the air, but even a penny fired at the velocity of a bullet would do some damage. The episode of MythBusters used a staple gun that fired them at about 64 mph which is about the max terminal velocity of a penny.

      --
      49 20 68 61 76 65 20 74 6F 6F 20 6D 75 63 68 20 66 72 65 65 20 74 69 6D 65 2E
    8. Re:Nail Gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      That's just BS dude. I've worked in my share of factories, and "Nail Gun Wars" is always a fun hobby. The _ONLY_ way a nail gun will pierce flesh is if it's held within 3 ft. and fired, and more and it will harmlessly bounce off of you. (Safety glasses were worn, yes!). I fondly remember my best hit, over 20 ft, and the nail lodged in the guys hair, it went right through the hole in the front of his hat (from wearing a baseball cap backwards) and stuck there pointing out, lodged in his hair. By your logic, he should have been dead right??

    9. Re:Nail Gun by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      Even at an extremely high velocity the penny would not even break the skin strangely enough, I believe at the speed of a bullet but I can't be sure.

      Assuming it was a US penny, do you happen to know if it was an all-copper penny or a copper-coated zinc penny (easily determined by its minting year)? And was there any control over whether it would strike face-on or edge-on?

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    10. Re:Nail Gun by bbowers · · Score: 1

      Unknown on what the penny was made of, and whether it struck face on or on the side. I couldn't find that specific episode on the site, however maybe it's talked about in the discussion forums. Otherwise there may be other resources for this which I'm going to try to look into later this evening after my hell of classes for the day.

      --
      Even a stopped clock gives the right time twice a day.
    11. Re:Nail Gun by knisa · · Score: 1

      They modified a pneumatic staple gun to feed the penny. They measured the speed, and IIRC it was something like 65 ft/s. That was just a shade above terminal velocity. The one guy got shot in the butt with it.

      The tests they did with ballistic gelatin showed that at best it could break the skin, but it would hardly be a life threatening experience.

      --
      This space for rent.
    12. Re:Nail Gun by cmstremi · · Score: 1
      For better security, I would suggest automating the whole process a bit further, get out of the room and see the results when done... but may be I'm just paranoid...
      You'll never get a Darwin Award with that attitude, loser!
    13. Re:Nail Gun by ElderKorean · · Score: 1

      I think that he was more worried about this not being a nail gun that uses normal nails. It fires bolts by the looks of the pictures - long cylindrical pieces of metal - more like a bullet.

      The nail would quickly loose velocity as it's momentum would not be a lot, but these would be a different story I guess.

      A good application for Aerogel? Either as a target, or a stopping material.

  15. An interesting invention by HGWang · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I'm sure it has lot of uses, apart from taking pictures of exploding food. Maybe the military could use it to confirm kills? When somebody is exploded, they could automatically take photo to make sure the enemy is dead.

    Or if camera in public places could take photos automatically when people shoot guns, so that they can get pictures of murderers faces? Kind of like a speed camera, but for shooting.

    --
    Please be understanding that English is not my first language, Thank you ^_^.
    1. Re:An interesting invention by emo+boy · · Score: 0

      Yeah it would take some convincing though on the part of the police to get this apparatus hooked up to a suspect's gun. Not quite sure that would work.

    2. Re:An interesting invention by Zakabog · · Score: 1

      Yeah and we'll just make sure they let us know they're gonna shoot someone so we can setup the BASIC switch and put the piece of cardboard in front of their guns so when they fire the guns it sets off the camera.

  16. Snap! by CaptainAlbert · · Score: 0

    Drat - you beat me by seconds! <doffs hat>

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=93845&cid=8054 398
    --
    These sigs are more interesting tha
    1. Re:Snap! by Orion442 · · Score: 0

      Sorry dude, it was the first thing to pop into my head too.

  17. that's quite a macgyver list! by dogas · · Score: 0, Funny

    I can see it now..

    "Ok, We'll need a disposable camera flash, an air compressor, an electronic sprinkler valve, and some pipe. This is gonna be a killer bong, man! Oh wait... look what else we can do with all this stuff!"

    --
    'When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro.' -HST
  18. bolt guns are so 6 years ago by Reverend528 · · Score: 1

    Honestly, If you're going to build a homemade weapon, build a railgun.

    1. Re:bolt guns are so 6 years ago by shuz · · Score: 1

      A suppose a rail gun would be cost prohibitive. Though it would be pretty cool. This is MIT maybe this is just the first part of the project.

      --
      There is or can be built a machine that can simulate any physical object. -Church-Turing principle
    2. Re:bolt guns are so 6 years ago by Darken_Everseek · · Score: 0

      bit of shameless karmawhoring...
      Powerlabs

    3. Re:bolt guns are so 6 years ago by Eiki · · Score: 1
  19. photographer who made this famous... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who was the photographer who made this type of photography famous? I think it was as early as the 40s or 30s or something.... My dad had a coffee table book of his work. The name escapes me, though.

    1. Re:photographer who made this famous... by josquin00 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Harold Edgerton. He was an MIT professor at some point during his career. Here is a photo that he was asked to take of an atomic bomb being detonated.

  20. bringing extreme sports to the kitchen by Arathrael · · Score: 5, Funny

    This has potential - kebab-making for the extreme sports enthusiast.

  21. Flash Speed by Detritus · · Score: 4, Informative
    I thought that one of the advantages of the Edgerton setup was that he used a fast strobe, something on the order of 1/200,000 of a second. This produced much better detail than a generic camera flash unit.

    If I remember correctly, he used a camera with an open shutter in a darkened room, triggering the strobe with the sound of the muzzle blast and an electronic delay.

    --
    Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    1. Re:Flash Speed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can the average digital camera even capture a frame that fast?

      Something seems... oh... cost prohibitive

      This was suppose to be a backyard experiment not a NASA project... dumbass

    2. Re:Flash Speed by aderusha · · Score: 4, Informative

      the shutter speed of the camera doesn't matter a bit. it's the speed of the flash that counts. the camera is setup for a long exposure, but it only collects light for the duration of the flash, so it doesn't really matter how fast the camera is.

    3. Re:Flash Speed by Fishstick · · Score: 1

      Well, sure - but that's not the point.

      These guys tore apart a disposable camera and wired it up to a micocontroller with the delay set up with some dip switches, and got some suprisingly decent results!

      Sure, it isn't going to produce images with comparable detail to a 1/200,000 second strobe, but it is pretty interesting what they were able to accomplish with much less sophisticated gear.

      --

      There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
      Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

    4. Re:Flash Speed by Detritus · · Score: 1

      I'd be interested in knowing whether there is a cheap and simple modification for a standard camera flash unit that would reduce the duration of the flash. The high-speed flash units used regular xenon tubes, just like the ones in regular flash units. I used to own an automatic flash unit that used a thyristor to dump the charge on the capacitor when a photocell detected sufficient light having been reflected from the subject. The circuitry was fairly simple.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    5. Re:Flash Speed by p3d0 · · Score: 1

      No need for an electronic delay, I think. Just put the microphone in the appropriate place. The bullet travels faster than the sound anyway.

      --
      Patrick Doyle
      I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
    6. Re:Flash Speed by InsaneGeek · · Score: 1

      I'd figure it's significantly easier to "tune" in the delay electronically, then to physically move a microphone a millionth of an inch each time when your timing is off.

    7. Re:Flash Speed by Technician · · Score: 1

      In this experiment flash speed doesn't matter much. Their cannon is a low velosity device. Just how much does the air slow down going from a 3/8ths air compressor hose into a 1 inch pipe. They have no local surge tank behind the sprinkler valve so their hose orface size is a big speed limiter. Therefore they can get by with using a photosresistor sensor (very slow rise time) instead of photodiode or break wire, a microprocessor (more delays) a mechanical relay (need I say more?) and they still need to program in a delay into the uP. That chunk if iron isn't going very fast. It would never capture the muzzle velosity of a bullit going through a playing card or apple. Note the ritz cracker photo. The cracker moved a lot and the projectile hasn't left yet.

      If they were shooting realy fast stuff, they would have to go to a wire break trigger or photodiode, eliminate the uP and mechanical relay and use a high speed flash. Adjusting the trigger location and using component rise times would be all the delay they would need. Since their stuff is relatively slow, a slow flash doesn't give much blurring.

      Look at the photo (I don't know where right now) of a bullit cutting a playing card in half. The card which is much ligher hasn't moved much. These experiments are orders of magnatude diffrent in speed.


      I thought that one of the advantages of the Edgerton setup was that he used a fast strobe, something on the order of 1/200,000 of a second. This produced much better detail than a generic camera flash unit.


      Most geneeric flash units can be as slow as 1mS.
      I've done a few light bulb breaking photos using a camera flash and a sound trigger. They are not posted online. Only the tiny fast moving pieces of glass show any blurring.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    8. Re:Flash Speed by p3d0 · · Score: 1

      A millionth of an inch? The rifle bullet is only travelling about five times the speed of sound, so you only need to move the microphone one inch for each five inches the bullet moves. The electronic tuning might still be easier, but it's not really necessary.

      --
      Patrick Doyle
      I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
  22. I did this once... way, way back using my Praktika by -Maurice66- · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I built one of those slave flash thingies somewhere in the mid '80s ... combined it with a microphone and a old Praktica reflex camera...
    (total kit was about $80 worth of cam and electronics...)

    I had about the same results, only then using black and white photo's.

    I think I am going to start one of those sites too. I am just as much a nerd as these guys!

  23. So very cool by 6.023e23 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    The most amazing thing is the low cost. While it's not as hi-tech as some hi-speed photography (such as with bullets), it's simple, easy, and can allow for live demos of the concept. Not to mention it allows geeks on a budget to make very cool toys.

    My thoughts start heading toward what other fun (AND educational ;-) ) things can be done with the strobe photography rig besides blowing up fruit...

    (I think I see $40 leaving my wallet in the very near future)

    1. Re:So very cool by Tassach · · Score: 1

      How do you get a picture of the money leaving your wallet at high speed?

      --
      Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
    2. Re:So very cool by Mysticalfruit · · Score: 1

      That's easy...

      Purchase any piece of Microsoft software!

      --
      Yes Francis, the world has gone crazy.
  24. Re:Not a knife by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The bodkin is more likely to have been something like a knitting needle (see here if you have an OED subscription).

  25. Immediately brings to mind ... by JSkills · · Score: 1, Funny
    This immediately brings to mind the time at the end of a college party we ended up placing bets on how long it would take an egg to explode in a microwave.

    I know it's dumb, but I sometimes I wish I could go back to those days of having such little responsibilities and being entertained so easily ...

    1. Re:Immediately brings to mind ... by markfive · · Score: 0

      So.. how long does it take?

    2. Re:Immediately brings to mind ... by JSkills · · Score: 1

      A little over 2 minutes. And it didn't explode like we'd thought. I was like all hard boiled and mutated looking ...

    3. Re:Immediately brings to mind ... by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      I was like all hard boiled and mutated looking ...

      Ah, so you're an egghead, and you were exposed to high-power microwaves for a little over two minutes? *ducks*

    4. Re:Immediately brings to mind ... by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 1
      Some did ... the microwave at Logisticon (Sunnyvale, late 70's) was much higher powered. That is, until that particular experiment was tried. Scrambled egg everywhere, door blown across the room and seriously warped.

      I'm glad I saw that before I tried drying the stray puppy.

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
  26. I guess someone has to say it... by MarconiusIII · · Score: 2, Funny

    How to REALLY defend yourself against an attacker bearing fresh fruit!! Using a bolt gun is cool, but I wonder if they could rework the system to be used with a cannon...

    --
    ~~ Everyone run! All has been found out!
  27. Re:Homemade weapon by A55M0NKEY · · Score: 1

    There was a story awhile back about an exploding jawbreaker I wonder if you could make some kind of candy powered musket...

    --

    Eat at Joe's.

  28. WOOHOO!! by MongooseCN · · Score: 2, Funny

    I just viewed ALL the photos on the site BEFORE it got slasdotted! Where's my award?!

    1. Re:WOOHOO!! by Giant+Killer · · Score: 3, Informative

      well, this is hosted on the mit.edu web server. i would hope that of all web servers on earth, mit's could survive a slashdotting.

  29. Re:Did I nod off for a second? by CaptainAlbert · · Score: 1

    Heh. You have no idea how embarrasing that is. :)

    In my defense, I haven't seen it for about ten years (and in any case, I prefered the A-team). In my haste to be the first person on the thread to post the joke, I didn't bother to check how it was spelled. Just to add insult to injury, I failed miserably anyway because Orion442 got there first.

    <prepares for serious karma-drubbing>

    --
    These sigs are more interesting tha
  30. Clean up your room! by blogboy · · Score: 1, Funny

    Maybe tidy up the "lab" a little next time? You are being /.'d after all.

  31. I feel dirty... by IceAgeComing · · Score: 3, Funny


    Watching an exploding lemon, caught endlessly in the throes of passionate destruction, well...it feels a little pornographic, doesn't it?

    1. Re:I feel dirty... by DarkBlackFox · · Score: 0

      So many witty responses to that statement...

    2. Re:I feel dirty... by zerocool^ · · Score: 0

      Don't be such a sourpuss. ...

      ba-dum-ching!

      ~Will

      --
      sig?
    3. Re:I feel dirty... by HisMother · · Score: 1

      When you squeeze my lemon, I'm gonna roll right outa bed...

      --
      Cantankerous old coot since 1957.
    4. Re:I feel dirty... by wideBlueSkies · · Score: 1

      Squeeze my lemon baby, till the juice runs down my leg...

      wbs.

      --
      Huh?
    5. Re:I feel dirty... by Kobal · · Score: 1

      Especially if it's a Ford Pinto.

  32. Ob. link to the Doc by cmcguffin · · Score: 4, Insightful
    This kind of high-speed stroboscopic photography was pioneered by Harold "Doc" Edgerton. You've undoubtedly seen some of his images.

    He was a MIT professor, prolific inventor, artist and by all acounts an incredibly nice person.

    He's also responsible for one of my favorite quotes:

    Work like hell
    Tell everyone everything you know
    Close a dread with a handshake
    Have fun

    1. Re:Ob. link to the Doc by cmcguffin · · Score: 1
      >Close a dread with a handshake

      That's what I get for cutting-and-pasting.

      Obviously, that should be, "Close a deal with a handshake."

    2. Re:Ob. link to the Doc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      His work is also a little more impressive because he used real bullets fired from real guns. The projectiles in this article move at 150m/s. This is significantly less than the 1500 to 3000 fps muzzle velocity of some equipment used by Edgerton.

      But the article is really *COOLER* nonetheless, since they didn't have any fancy laboratories to do the work.

    3. Re:Ob. link to the Doc by Wilk4 · · Score: 1

      and, he was the first to show it could be done, and could make very cool images... it's always easier to replicate what someone else does first... (not that the recent one isn't cool, just giving Doc Edgerton his due)

    4. Re:Ob. link to the Doc by gkuz · · Score: 2, Interesting
      incredibly nice person

      Not just nice, but a great teacher as well. I took the strobe photography lab, and even though he was semi-retired he always hung around and would offer helpful but non-judgemental advice to anyone.

      But what I thought was far cooler than the bullet-through-object photos, which were so easy you did them in the first few weeks, was the pictures of an exploding firecracker. Since it generates its own light, you can't use the darkened-room-with-fast-flash approach, but have to use far more sophisticated photo equipment with rotating slit shutters and stuff (you can't move the film stock quickly enough because it'll disintegrate.)

      Man, I had a great time in that class.

  33. Great..... by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
    Just what college students need. A cheap, easy assemble setup that allows them to take pictures of things being destroyed at high speeds.

    I give it a month before somebody kills themselves with it at a party whilst trying to perform some trick involving the device, a keg, and someone doing a kegstand atop it.

    --
    Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  34. Needs One Thing by Beardydog · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Stereo images. Splatter in 2D is nice, but splatter in 3D is heavenly.

    1. Re:Needs One Thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      maybe get more cameras (20?)
      and hook them up in parallel
      to logic controller.
      snap pictures and same time from
      different angels.
      then insert pictures into gif animater and
      voila! a "around-it-goes" animated gif
      alla intro scence of "swordfish" where
      the hostage gets blown to little pieces ...

    2. Re:Needs One Thing by B3ryllium · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's easier than that ... the Edgerton technique was to leave the shutter open with the lights out, and then the flash illuminates the scene - because there is only a light source for a fraction of a second, you don't even need the logic controller for the "snapping" of pictures, you just need it to close the shutters before you turn the lights back on :)

  35. friends may have ideas that you don't agree with, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    friends may have ideas that you don't agree with, but as any Gemini knows, it's all about compromise. By the end of the month, you will have learned something very important that will change how you view the world and, most importantly, yourself.

  36. Cool idea, bad subjects by vlauria · · Score: 2, Interesting

    These guys went through all that trouble and are only shooting a nail through a cracker? Come on, there are so many cooler things then that.

    - Nail into water ballon
    - Nail through fragile glass
    - Nail into steel (watch nail bend)
    - Nail into neighbors cat (okay, maybe not such a good idea)

    We could even make it a /. poll.

  37. Back, and to the left by BenBenBen · · Score: 0

    Back, and to the left.
    Back, and to the left.
    Back, and to the left.

    Quite obviously the grapefruit was shot from somewhere else, and you're just trying to set up the poor BASIC controller as a patsy.

    --
    The Slashdot Paradox: "100% Overrated"
  38. Re:I did this once... way, way back using my Prakt by Wiseazz · · Score: 1

    I am just as much a nerd as these guys!

    In the mid '80s I was around 5 years old - Please share your nerd exploits with the younger generation so we can bask in your geekiness and strive for perfection.

    No, seriously, please do put a site up. Just let me know before it gets posted on /. (Unless you have some Uber-MIT-bandwith).

    --
    My sig sucks.
  39. PURE GENIUS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    ****

    This is Slashdot Performance Art at its acme--I nominate it for the Hall of Fame!

    ****

  40. Some more photos by leoaugust · · Score: 4, Informative
    Here are some more frozen-time photos
    --
    To see a world in a grain of sand, and then to step back and see the beach where the sand lies ...
    1. Re:Some more photos by JimBobJoe · · Score: 1

      Has anyone ever seen slow time imagery of a popcorn kernel popping? I've been looking for that for years.

    2. Re:Some more photos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      During an interview with Nebraska Education Television in 1985, Edgerton recalled how his invention "stopped" the moving parts of an engine so efficiently, he wondered what would happen if the strobe lamp was turned on every day objects. A water spigot was nearby. Suddenly, a stream of water was revealed to be nothing more than individual globs of water generated by a city water pump miles away.

      Duh?

    3. Re:Some more photos by Lars+T. · · Score: 2, Informative

      The German TV show for kids "Sendung mit der Maus" once filmed popcorn with a high-speed camera. Maybe you can find that on P2P (search for either "Sendung..." or "Sachgeschichten"). You could buy it on this tape, but that's Euro 15.90 and in PAL.

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    4. Re:Some more photos by crzfire · · Score: 1

      http://courses.ncssm.edu/hsi/pacsci/pdf/popcorn.pd f check this out

      --
      life sucks, then you die
  41. My Wife will hate me but... by PetoskeyGuy · · Score: 1, Funny

    I *SO* hope my son ends up doing stuff like this when he gets older. At least this project produced some cool arguably scientific evidence. We only ended up with messes or trying to figure out good alibis.

    1. Re:My Wife will hate me but... by JohnnyComeLately · · Score: 1
      I was thinking the exact same thing. I just hope I am able to teach a little more common sense into my son (when he's older, he's only 16 mo right now) than I had. I was about 13 and decided to see what an apple would do when you shot it with a CO2 BB-gun. Of course, my friends were game and we had the apples set up in no time at the end of my driveway.

      *pull trigger*
      See apple move a little
      *distant -TINK- sound*
      We had fun taking a dozen or so shots (reloading CO2 bottle midway), before it was time to re-assemble the pieces since we had run out of apples to shoot.

      We made a second mistake at this point. The first was not paying more attention to the -TINK- sound. The second was moving the apple a little farther down the driveway. The TINK was the BB hitting the house across the street. The movement of the apple changed the trajectory to conincide with the front-door storm door (glass) common in Oklahoma. So now the event became:
      *pull trigger*
      See apple move a little
      *distant -TINK- sound*
      *pull trigger*
      See apple move a little
      *distant -TINK- sound*
      *Large panel of glass shattering across the street*
      We scrambled to assemble all pieces of the apple and hid in the house. About 2 hours later, the neighbor's daughter came over and asked if we had seen any kids playing with BB guns in the area. :( "Ohhhh nooooo, we couldn't believe kids would do that! Why? What happened?"

      So that's my, "Don't play with that, you'll shoot your eye out," story.

      John

  42. I don't laugh when you do it wrong. by Beardydog · · Score: 1

    Exploding edibles, what's it all about? Is it good, or is it whack?

    1. Re:I don't laugh when you do it wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, thank you for pointing it out. I will not fail in the future.

  43. Going digital .... by wwwillem · · Score: 1

    This a good example of modern times: "digital is better" and it reminds me of those Nikon, Canon, etc. ads in the early eighties about their lenses being designed "with computers". So then they should be better, yeah.....

    If you need a 5 ms delay, why not simply use an RC circuit (for the new kids on the block: that's a resistor and capacitor) and if you really want to "go digital", a simple 50 cents 78xx or 40xx counter chip would have done the trick. Mmm, but if you're grown up only knowing that you need a computer to play music, than you can expect this type of overkill.

    Anyway, I still love projects like these, even when they are done already thousands times before.

    --
    Browsers shouldn't have a back button!! It's all about going forward...
    1. Re:Going digital .... by KD5UZZ · · Score: 1

      The nice thing about a BASIC Stamp is that it can be reused. Instead of having lots of components you can have ONE Stamp and reuse it over and over again. I doubt they bought the stamp just for this project.

      --
      -Daniel
      KD5UZZ
      www.w5yj.org
    2. Re:Going digital .... by HeghmoH · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So you need a five ms electronic delay. Do you:

      1) Write a short program using a microcontroller you already have.

      2) Go out and buy some electronics and build a little delay circuit.

      Would you really forego the simpler solution just because it's 'overkill'?

      --
      Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
    3. Re:Going digital .... by falzer · · Score: 1

      Sure, it's a BASIC stamp. Give these guys some credit though. It's not like they thought they needed Linux on a PC to do the job. ;-)

    4. Re:Going digital .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, why not? This is /. after all, where there is always someone who wants to one-up the next guy.
      Besides, if they had used an RC circuit, or a circuit using a counter, someone else would have said "why didn't they just use a three dollar pic with an internal clock? Fewer parts, cheap, reusable..." you get the idea.

    5. Re:Going digital .... by Hagakure · · Score: 1

      apologies in advance for this...

      3) Profit!

      --


      If this is Heaven I'm bailin out! I cant tolerate this ol tin-tub, so fulla trash and rats...
    6. Re:Going digital .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Besides, if they had used an RC circuit, or a circuit using a counter, someone else would have said "why didn't they just use a three dollar pic with an internal clock?

      And then I would've said, "they didn't use a PIC because the PIC programming model is ugly and offensive." I've never used a stamp before, but my first reaction was to wonder why they would want to use something that is programmed in BASIC. I know BASIC isn't that bad of a language to use for this type of application, and it's funny to realize that my reaction comes from having used Visual Basic.

  44. Kudos on by ChiefScientist · · Score: 1
    This pic

  45. Reminds me... by JediTrainer · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I have an uncle who assists police with forensics work (he's a dentist during the day, but the town he lives in is small and they need all the help they can get).

    One thing that stumped the police was a scene where a single bullet came through the windshield of a car and hit the driver.

    That in itself wasn't surprising. What was surprising is that the back of the guy's head got completely blown off - a really huge hole that they couldn't explain at first.

    So they did an experiment using high-speed film/camera in a lab, where they got a few windshields to play with and a few human skull mockups, and a gun with bullets of the same make/model as the one they've identified.

    I saw a copy of (one of the) pictures they took, which was quite amazing (yet horrifying if you think what happened) - a giant cone of glass shards projecting outwards from where the bullet entered the windshield. The cone was small near the front of the driver's head, but while passing through the skull it continued on its outward path and blew a massive hole in the back.

    Scary stuff.

    --

    You can accomplish anything you set your mind to. The impossible just takes a little longer.
    1. Re:Reminds me... by babbage · · Score: 1

      One of Penn & Teller's books had a demonstration like this. They wanted to debunk the conspiracy theorists that don't believe that a shooter from the schoolbook depository building was responsible for killing President Kennedy, on grounds that his head snapped backwards -- towards the building -- and his face was more damaged than the back of his head.

      According to Newton's laws, this makes sense though: if every action causes an opposite reaction, then it would make sense for the head to bounce back in the direction from which it was hit.

      To demonstrate, Penn & Teller set up a high speed photo rig, and, using various pieces of fruit as stand-ins for human skulls (watermelons, canteloupes, etc), they took a bunch of pictures of the fruit being shot with a rifle like the one Lee Harvey Oswald is said to have used. Just as Newton would have predicted, the fruits all bounced *towards* the direction of the shot, and the exit holes were all bigger than the entrance holes. Very interesting stuff...

  46. once built something similar by SuperBanana · · Score: 4, Informative

    A friend and I once built a sprinkler-valve based widget that was quite impressive. In our first test, however, we left the barrel off, and the resulting pressure wave nearly deafened us. Those valves flow pretty well...

    You know how they tell you to shoot stuff into a hanging blanket, because it 'catches' the object? Our first 'victim', a magic marker, went THROUGH the blanket and was never seen again.

    We developed the world's fastest(and messiest) french fry maker(use your imagination- sporting goods involved)...shot a 4-foot broom handle a couple hundred feet into the air and down his yard(looked like a mini-cruise-missile)...discovered it made an excellent fire extinguisher(fill barrel with water, cork, aim, blammo- between the gust of air and the water/steam, you could do a serious number a good sized fire with just two cups of water)...etc. You could even launch cylinders of compressed snow(trick is to compress it enough that it doesn't disintegrate on launch, but doesn't hurt anyone/anything when it impacts..although ice rods looked awesome fired at a brick wall).

    The best was when my friend's parents got home. His mother walked out onto the porch first. "Oh my GOD, what are you DOING?" His father followed, saw the compressor, air tanks, etc..."Oh cool, whatcha guys doin'?" :-)

    1. Re:once built something similar by scrytch · · Score: 2, Interesting

      ...discovered it made an excellent fire extinguisher(fill barrel with water, cork, aim, blammo- between the gust of air and the water/steam, you could do a serious number a good sized fire with just two cups of water).

      This technique is now being used by firefighters to fight high-temp fires that are inaccessable by vehicles, such as in tunnels. Three or four blasts from the backpack fire extinguisher into a fire that's melting cars, and you can walk right into it. No weird chemicals needed either.

      --
      I've finally had it: until slashdot gets article moderation, I am not coming back.
  47. Gallagher by q-the-impaler · · Score: 0

    I don't think Gallagher's Sledge-o-matic has anything to worry about.

    --
    Sierra Tango Foxtrot Uniform
  48. Not that bad by Otto · · Score: 2, Informative

    Is it bad that my first thought was "Newton or Asimov"?

    Not that bad. You could have thought of the bartender from Love Boat.

    --
    - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
    1. Re:Not that bad by Fortyseven · · Score: 1

      I'm a sad sad man, that was the guy I first thought of. :D

    2. Re:Not that bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Informative.

    3. Re:Not that bad by Otto · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that is some poor moderation there. Amazing. :)

      --
      - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
  49. High School Project by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here are some pictures taken by high school students.

  50. Matrix Effects? by polyp2000 · · Score: 1

    Hmm Im thinking that if they managed to build this for 40 dollars, adding more digital cameras in a circular array one could make some very nice 3d rotating views of the aforementioned fleshy fruits exploding.

    --
    Electronic Music Made Using Linux http://soundcloud.com/polyp
    1. Re:Matrix Effects? by ursg · · Score: 1
      Hmm Im thinking that if they managed to build this for 40 dollars, adding more digital cameras in a circular array one could make some very nice 3d rotating views of the aforementioned fleshy fruits exploding.

      The guys from Frozen Reality have done it - they have a setup of 8 digital cameras in a semi-circle around the target.

      Great 3D-Views of exploding balloons, shattering light bulbs (and other destructive events)

    2. Re:Matrix Effects? by stile · · Score: 1

      Uhh, in a circle? Right, some nice 3d rotating views of a camera or two exploding.

  51. Reading /. before having coffee by p4ul13 · · Score: 1
    I could have sworn that instead of seeing "Photographing Exploding Edibles", that the title was "Photographing Exploding Bibles".

    For a brief moment I thought "Forget the camera, get an exorcist!"

    --
    Paul Lenhart writes words!
  52. Subject matter synchronization by troon · · Score: 1

    Here's another:

    --
    Ydco co ,df C erb-y go. a Ekrpat t.fxrapev
  53. You aren't listening! by Beardydog · · Score: 1

    Stereo animated GIF!

    The only thing better than 3D splatter is rotating 3D splatter.

  54. Not so smart for MIT Students. by liquidzero4 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Did it occur to any one that the use of the BASIC stamp was over kill. I'll agree it makes the project a little bit easier but these guys are MIT students. All you seriously need is a photo sensor, a transistor, an op-amp and a relay. Very simple. The only tricky part is that using this simple circuit would require precious placement of the photo sensor. This shouldn't be a problem if you know the velocity of the projectile which they know. You'd think some MIT nerds would have done it this way which is a little more elegant.

    1. Re:Not so smart for MIT Students. by kevlar · · Score: 1

      Why prototype in hardware if it can be done in software faster and easier?

    2. Re:Not so smart for MIT Students. by liquidzero4 · · Score: 1

      I'd agree if this was some sort of complex circuit but it's not. In this case it's probaly easier to make the H/W and debug it then it is to use a micro controller.

  55. More exploding fruit & stuff by tylernt · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Only these guys used real guns, no some sissy PVC contraption: http://www.bitpress.com/dc/ The 7 cans is my favorite. :)

    --
    DRM 'manages access' in the same way that a prison 'manages freedom'
  56. Use two sensors? by period3 · · Score: 1

    I wonder if one could use two photoresistive sensors in front of the barrel, such that the projectile first passes one, and then the other.

    The time between when the two photo sensors are passed would indicate (with a simple calculation) the speed of the projectile -- which could then be used to calculate precisely when the flash should go off.

  57. Thank you Doctor Eggerton... by Lobo_Louie · · Score: 1

    ... for the advances in high speed photography!

  58. Just a link for your viewing pleasures by Mika_Lindman · · Score: 3, Interesting
  59. Coolest /. article in months by bodland · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Rover photos and exlploding fruit...

    After all the RIAA, Patriot Act, SCO, Microsoft, Linux legal articles it is nice to relish in why we keep coming back to /.

    Not since the highspeed CD-ROM spinning has there been something as geeky neat as this...

  60. Budget solution: by JediTrainer · · Score: 3, Funny

    1. 8 year old male

    2. All-syrup squishee. Add caffeine to taste

    3. Hand the kid the camera.

    That should be enough for the kid's reflexes to match this elaborate setup.

    --

    You can accomplish anything you set your mind to. The impossible just takes a little longer.
    1. Re:Budget solution: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An all syrup squishee? Such a thing had never been done!

      Just make it happen

      If you survive, please come again.

  61. Say what ? by coolmos · · Score: 1

    At first, i really thought it said:

    Phtotgraphing Exploding Bibles.

    Weird thoughts about Palestinian Suicide Bombers crossed my mind.

  62. Re:These People Are Evil Republicans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The musselmen are never innocent, you just have to watch the wrestling for five minutes to see them cheating all the time!

  63. Starvin' Marvin by Mr2cents · · Score: 2, Funny

    Cartman: No, Marvin, those are not for eating, they are for making photos while we make them explode!

    --
    "It's too bad that stupidity isn't painful." - Anton LaVey
  64. Book by nycsubway · · Score: 1

    Harold Edgarton also has book published about his work called "Stopping Time". The photos are amazing. He did so much more than shooting bullets through cards and apples. My favorite is the pictures in the back of the book from an atomic bomb test. He was able to capture images of the explosion from several miles away as the fireball grew from a small ball engulfing the top of the metal tower on which the bomb sat to a ball that then englufed the tower and began reaching the ground.

    Simply amazing photos in his book.

  65. Even better: in 3D! by ursg · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Using a quite similar approach, the guys from Frozen Reality take even more immpresive Pictures in 3D.

    Their system is built from 8 identical digital cameras set up in a half-circle around the target object, all triggered by a single flash.

    The images are processed my a morphing program and create stunning movies of exploding balloons, a metal ball crushing a stone plate etc.

  66. If you think the apple was good...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    .....then take a look at this =)

    http://courses.ncssm.edu/hsi/pacsci/student_phot os .html

    1. Re:If you think the apple was good...... by Wilk4 · · Score: 1

      nice link, but you had a space in the url that broke it. try this one
      Exhibition of High Speed Photography

  67. Yeah, similar until the cops come. by medscaper · · Score: 4, Funny
    I had a similar experience.

    I decided, at my 8-year-old's insistence, to build a tennis ball thrower for my 2 year old Yellow Lab. I went and found some parts - basically two 2-foot lengths of 2" PVC, some various PVC connectors, a switch box with a 9 volt battery, all wired to a sprinkler valve between the two pieces of PVC. It looked like an awkward "U" of PVC and electronics taped together.

    One of the PVC tubes had an endcap with a welding pressure guage threaded into it, along with a brass air valve. The PVC was rated at something like 400 psi. But, I figured, for my test, I would stick to something low, like around 35 or 40.

    So, I'm out in the garage, dog anxiously at my side, filling up the pressure tube to about 45 psi. I let it sit, stood back, and everything seemed to hold well for about 60 seconds, so I thought, "Yeah, this is safe. Cool!"

    I started looking around for the tennis ball I've brought with me to take it outside and try it. I turned around to pick it up off the floor, and there was this HORRENDOUS BOOM!!! followed by some crashing around and various things falling off of shelves.

    I collect my thoughts, and after making sure all my limbs and digits are still on, I look over at the garage door. There is a large, pumpkin-sized dent in the door - about 5 inches deep - with a beautiful hole about the size of the $40 pressure guage at the center of it.

    I looked around for the dog, who'd been at my side, and found nothing but a cute little urine trail off into the corner of the garage where the dog was cowering.

    Jesus. What the hell happened?!? Apparently, the glue wasn't quite dried on the PVC - it was only about an hour old, and the end of the pipe blew off, putting a huge dent in my garage door, and blowing the rest of the contraption back across the shop, knocking down canning jars and various stored things.

    So, I coaxed the dog out of the garage for a few minutes, and walked out into the sunlight to shake my head and give up on this, and hear, "Hello?!? Everyone OK?!" It was a COP!

    Apparently several people had called about the shotgun/explosion/whatever and the cop was highly concerned. Nothing like seeing a cop, gun drawn, coming aroudn the corner of your house.

    Anyway, I was told in no uncertain terms that it was illegal to play with any of this stuff (yes, even only compressed air) within city limits, and...well...I can see why.

    Poor dog. I just throw the ball, these days.

    --
    Any sufficiently well-organized Government is indistinguishable from bullshit.
    1. Re:Yeah, similar until the cops come. by aelfric35 · · Score: 1

      I understand the value of modding and keeping stuff on-topic, but I don't care if this _was_ offtopic. It was funny as heck. Thanks for sharing.

      --

      "Den som vover mister Fodfaeste et Oieblik; den som ikke vover mister Livet." -Soren Kierkegaard
    2. Re:Yeah, similar until the cops come. by starm_ · · Score: 1

      I have built a similar device which can be found here
      I didn't realize it was so dangerous. We use to put up to 120 PSI of pressure inside.
      It was great though. We could launch potatoes at insane distances. We were no even able to measure the distance because the potato was going too fast and too far to track with the eye. Even when launching completely vertically we would lose sight immediately. Once, I think I heard a sonic boom while the potato was ejected.

    3. Re:Yeah, similar until the cops come. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      No problem. I should dig that thing out and put up a website with photos and what NOT to do.

      But it still scares the dog senseless to go anywhere near the shop, and she barks at PVC.

      Go figure. I guess dogs just learn lessons a lot quicker.

    4. Re:Yeah, similar until the cops come. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This sounds quite a bit like pumpkin chucking.
      article

  68. Can be done fairly easily by adrianbaugh · · Score: 1

    On low output the duration of a pretty standard flash should be of the order of 1/30,000 second. The awkward part is synchronising the camera so it exposes at the right time. An infra-red beam coupled with a variable delay circuit ought to do, though you might want to use a SLR where you can lock up the mirror so as to reduce shutter latency.

    --
    "'I pass the test,' she said. 'I will diminish, and go into the West, and remain Galadriel.'"
    - JRR Tolkien.
  69. Hurdling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So that's what they call it these days?

    Unless he managed to get the bolt to leap over hurdles on its way to the target, no, they call it "hurtling".

    Alas, those who learn to spell words only by hearing them pronounced incorrectly will continue to make these kinds of mistakes (and teach others to make the same mistake in both speech and text) until corrected.

  70. Weapons... by Darth23 · · Score: 1

    of Minor Destruction

    --

    -------- In Soviet Russia, "Soviet Russia" sigs hate Slashdot.

  71. Desktop Background Sized Pictures? by Robmonster · · Score: 1

    Anyone know where I can get my digital mitts on some of these pictures (especially the linked Bullet-Through-Apple one) large enough to use as a desktop background?

    --
    I have no sig yet I must scream.
  72. WARNING: Parent's link needs QUICKTIME! by planetsphinx · · Score: 1

    WARNING: Parent's link needs QUICKTIME!

    --
    -Mikey
  73. mod parent up by Wilk4 · · Score: 1
    that's a nice collection of high-speed photographs, and of other odd photographic techniques...

    also see the index page for this set at Photographs by Andrew Davidhazy

  74. PVC is Xray transparent and sharp as glass by obtuse · · Score: 1

    PVC is X-ray transparent. Hard to find in your flesh.

    PVC shatters like glass, and is almost as sharp. I cut myself on a shard of broken PVC from a homemade tool a couple of weeks ago. It was so sharp I didn't notice until I saw the blood on my work, wondering where it came from.

    In case of failure, think multiple exploratory surgeries. Often people trying to make noisemakers (pipe bombs or destructive devices to the FBI) end up with bits of glass sharp PVC as permanent companions.

    Also don't forget about cumulative stresses and invisible damage. Typically this sort of device is wrapped in tape & wire, or even enclosed, in addition to being very overbuilt. Imagine if your PVC had been abused at the hardware store, and you didn't know it.

    You don't have to be in the same room while this is fired. I wouldn't the first time.

    --
    Assembly is the reverse of disassembly.
    1. Re:PVC is Xray transparent and sharp as glass by leftover · · Score: 1

      If you really must use PVC, at least use schedule 80 pipe. The stuff commonly available in hardware stores is schedule 40, intended for use in unpressurized drains only.

      --
      Bent, folded, spindled, and mutilated.
  75. Here's mine by PetoskeyGuy · · Score: 2, Funny

    Lets see, I was about 7 years old, playing in the field behind our house setting ants on fire with a magnifying glass. It was a dry summer and at some point the field itself caught fire. All the neighborhood came from all around to put out the fire with hoses and shovels and blankets. It burned about 2 acres before we finally got it all out.

    Lots of angry people marched me to my door and told me to go inside and tell my mother what I had done. It turns out that even though she was sitting by the window, she was on the phone with the TV on and never noticed. When I tried to tell her she laughed and to this day doesn't believe it ever happened.

  76. Exploding vs. Photography by bp33 · · Score: 1

    Cool stuff. Emphasis here was on the Exploding aspect. The Photography was a bit of an afterthought - otherwise they'd have put a sheet below & behind the objects!

  77. How to make this cooler. by dlakelan · · Score: 1

    To shorten the pulse length you need to quench the main xenon tube earlier. One way to do this might be to put a smaller flash lamp (available at radio shack?) in series with a smallish capacitor and put those in parallel to the main flash lamp. The goal is to trigger the smaller flash lamp as a turn off circuit, it will divert the current into the small capacitor which will drop the voltage across the main flash lamp causing it to stop conducting. The small capacitor will rapidly charge and hence little energy would be used in turning off the circuit.

    Strobe Faq

    Now that you have a main trigger and a quench trigger, you can have your BASIC stamp control the flash duration. A normal flash lasts a millisecond or so, you could probably put this flash very close to your target (perhaps with some plexiglas to protect it) and trigger the flash for say 50-200 microseconds instead giving a much faster stop-motion (though darker picture).

    Crank up the CCD sensitivity and bring the flash close and you'd be all set.

    Alternatively you could use a pre-built "auto flash" and replace the light sensor with a output line from the BASIC stamp. This would cost more, but be easier from a construction standpoint since the quench design is debugged already.

    You may have to put some tape over the sensor, and open the case and control the quench with a clip lead.

    --
    ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) http://www.endpointcomputing.com a scientific approach to custom computing.
  78. Who needs a STAMP? by AFirmGraspOfReality · · Score: 1

    Heck, a high-school buddy and I did photos at least as good as these in the early 80's with much less equipment. Similar concept though. We used a inexpensive SLR, slave flash and a pellet gun. Position everything, turn off the lights, oprn the shutter, shoot the gun (bang! ) close the shutter. Repeat until out of film and/or food. The trick for the whole thing was the trigger mechanism. Great success was had with a thin/tough steel plate hanging in front of a nail. The idea was to swing the plate backwards a very small distance to touch the nail and close a circuit to fire the flash. In photos taken 90 degrees to the plane of the plate, the plate pretty much disappears. The concept is that the pellet striking the target moved the food just enough to touch the plate and then fire the flash. We managed to get some shots actually capturing the deformed lead pellet in mid-air. Huge fun and amazement for all. I do applaud the STAMP implementation...the fun factor of blasting food has clearly not been lost!

    1. Re:Who needs a STAMP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its way easier with a microcontroller - I created a trigger/timer mechanism with a Texas Instrument MSP430F149 microcontroller and got equally impressive photos. When you are taking photos of water drips for example the whole event takes 20ms... and there is a lot the goes on in that time. So my design could time down to the microsecond, and was triggered by a sound switch or a photodiode/led pair.

      check out

      http://www.deviantart.com/deviation/2100747/
      ht tp://www.deviantart.com/view/1997156/

      for a couple of my shots.

    2. Re:Who needs a STAMP? by damonv · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a neat setup. A simple 555 would probably have done the trick as well, but that would have required more effort. This design proved to be a little more flexible, and easier to fine tune than anything else that's been mentioned so far would be (so far as I can tell.) It also required very little electronics expertise. Up next: when some friends at MIT finish building a giant cannon capable of shooting campbells soup cans, I hope to photograph some hot soup-on-wall action, although I may hide myself and my camera behind plexiglass for that one.

  79. I love images... by jezra · · Score: 1
    images of hot bolt-on-food action
  80. Gallagher by VegetariMan · · Score: 1

    Nice to see that Gallagher is keeping up with technology. :)

    --
    --Nick
  81. The pictures look like by zodar · · Score: 1

    Fruit doing spit takes.

  82. Re:Card cut photo by Technician · · Score: 1

    Card cut photo has been found. Compare this one with how much the ritz cracker moved.

    The url is http://www.afterimagegallery.com/dledgerton.htm

    --
    The truth shall set you free!
  83. Are human brains... by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

    considered edible for these purposes? :-/

    --
    In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
  84. why use a flash? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    why not just use a bright lamp or spotlight? turn it on before firing, turn it off when done. then you wouldn't need any flash triggering or hardware. what am i missing?

  85. Disposable Cameras? by nametaken · · Score: 1

    They should have used the walgreens digital cameras that we've read so much about for added geek points. As it is, I give them a 9.8! Go Isaac, Damon, and Reid!

  86. Can It Photograph by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

    how fast SCO is going out of business?

    Or how fast Microsoft is going to follow?

    --
    Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  87. And he thought about the photos by spoco2 · · Score: 1

    At least he made the resulting photos pleasing to look at before having them shown to the masses... having plain backgrounds, nice lighting etc.

    The ones in this article look quite frankly shite, with bits of apparatus hanging around etc.

    Sure, your test shots can have that kind of junk around, but if you want to impress people put up a damn sheet or something people!

  88. The Fruit Fucker 2000 approves. by JonMartin · · Score: 1
    --
    Serve Gonk.
  89. Someone has to say it... by MarconiusIII · · Score: 1

    This is REALLY the way to defend yourself against an attacker bearing fresh fruit!!

    --
    ~~ Everyone run! All has been found out!
  90. SCO Management by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was hoping there would be a shot of SCO senior management being impaled against a wall, alas not.

  91. Pinching bullets by MacFury · · Score: 1
    My father's friends used to pinch bullets in a vice untill they shot (so he says).

    Most of them are still alive. :-)

  92. I want to see... by jesser · · Score: 1

    Matrix-style "bullet-time" videos of exploiting fruit.

    --
    The shareholder is always right.
  93. cucumber illumination by Frisky070802 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Ages ago, the Digital Western Research Lab (which became Compaq and then merged into HP Labs) had a technical note and video along these lines... quite funny.

    --
    Mencken had it right. So glad that's old news.
  94. Re:I did this once... way, way back using my Prakt by -Maurice66- · · Score: 0

    talking about fools: nah... you better learn Dutch first. I guess you would be one of those typical USians: no foreign language skills AT ALL since to you it seems there is only one country in existence...

  95. Re:I did this once... way, way back using my Prakt by -Maurice66- · · Score: 0

    hmm... might do, but the 80's was not the period wher I documented a lot. I do not have the actual electronics any more either... so it would be just some pics and nothing more.