Slashdot Mirror


Hackers Hall of Fame

An anonymous reader writes "tlc.discovery.com has a nice feature called Hackers Hall of Fame. They have included 15 bios of modern and not so modern hackers and crackers. " Definitely a few names that probably don't deserve to be on the list, but for the most part this is a good list.

445 comments

  1. Bill Gates, Hall of Fame Hacker? (P.S. First Post) by Can+it+run+Linux · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Yeah, yeah, I know, I'll be lynched for saying that Bill "I am Satan" Gates should be on par with RMS, ESR and Linus, but think about this for a second.

    Bill founded what is now the largest software company in the world, and wether or not you agree with him, he has made a important contribution to the computing industry: Microsoft brought desktop computing to the home user.

    Now, be honest. How many of us had our first computer experience with MS-DOS or Windows 3.1? Do you think that if computers still consisted on thin-client-server models based on huge VAX mainframes, that Joe and Jane Smith would be able to dial-in to AOL and connect to thousands of people around the world? Would the Internet have blossomed into the vast information network it is today without the aid of easy-to-use software from Microsoft? How about Grandma who wants to set up a webcam so she can chat with her grandchildren? She doesn't want to have to sit and hack kernels for hours. She wants Plug-and-Play, baby.

    Look, disagree all you like, but thanks to things like Windows, Office, and MSN, modern computing has been made easy and affordable to everyone, thanks to pioneers like Bill Gates.

  2. Worst Photo by mindshadow · · Score: 5, Funny

    I think one of the criteria may have been "worst photo"

    1. Re:Worst Photo by ktulu1115 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I thought the US Marshalls posting for Mitnick was rather humorous... but Stallman's and Linus's images were somewhat decent though. If Gates was up there (thank God he isn't) then they definately need his mugshot as the picture.

      I think they chose "crappy" pictures like that on purpose to help convey the old-school "hacker" image that was popular back in the day.

      --
      # fuser -v /dev/attention | grep work
      #
    2. Re:Worst Photo by br3itain · · Score: 5, Funny

      Along those lines, try the "Programming Language Inventor or Serial Killer?" quiz.
      http://www.malevole.com/mv/misc/killerquiz/
      I got a 6 out of 10...
      Kind of begs the question of whether or not genius really is kin to madness.

  3. Mass Media Idiocy strikes again by grub · · Score: 4, Insightful


    They don't do the oft-maligned term "hacker" any justice by including convicted criminals in that list. They should have distinct lists, IE: a "Hackers Hall of Fame" and a "Crackers Hall of Shame" rather than lumping the two together. Mind you, these are the people that forgot the "L" in TLC stood for "Learning" and started filling the channel with home decorating shows.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:Mass Media Idiocy strikes again by garcia · · Score: 1

      oh they "Learned" all right. They figured out that it was making them a lot more money to give women a show that they could force their husbands and unlucky boyfriends to watch.

      I not only am being begged to get cable when the gf returns but I also shelled out money for the While you were out DVD...

      I heard somewhere that it was the most popular CATV show for 20-early 30 somethings...

    2. Re:Mass Media Idiocy strikes again by ciaran_o_riordan · · Score: 1

      I think the real point of this list is to get 5 great hackers and then stick in your favourite 10 to give them fame by association. It's like giving an award to "Stallman and John Doe" - wow, who is this amazing John Doe?.

      A *decent* blurb on each would make this list newsworthy, but as it is - it looks like a few facts scraped together to make it look researched.

    3. Re:Mass Media Idiocy strikes again by noselasd · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Thats right.
      However the rest of the world use "hacker" the way the Jargon File defines cracker. For the common man hacker = cracker. So having a "hackers and crackers" list might make sense if they think crackers and hackers are the same.
      Though they messed this list completly up. Stallman and Dennis Ritchie are not "crackers" and does defintly not belong in the same list as crackers.
      Aleph - Supposedly Dennis Ritchie favourite language

    4. Re:Mass Media Idiocy strikes again by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      blame this guy :

      "
      Robert Morris

      Handle: rtm

      Claim to fame: The son of the chief scientist at the National Computer Security Center -- part of the National Security Agency (NSA) -- this Cornell University graduate student introduced the word "hacker" into the vernacular when he accidentally unleashed an Internet worm in 1988. Thousands of computers were infected and subsequently crashed.
      "
      .

      anyways most of them seem to fit more to the 'hacker' than to the 'cracker'.. well now they should just make a list of the most famous netHACKERS.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    5. Re:Mass Media Idiocy strikes again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Make me a Foe and ignore my comments. No skin off my arse, AC.

    6. Re:Mass Media Idiocy strikes again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about you stop posting instead?

    7. Re:Mass Media Idiocy strikes again by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      Crackers are people who crack copy protection. Hackers get machines to do something other than what they are intended. That usually means giving other than intended access, because that is what is most interestig. Sorry.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    8. Re:Mass Media Idiocy strikes again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't feel like it. Besides, trolls taking the time to bitch at me warms my heart in a vampiric way. It shows that in some sense I'm pissing them off to such a degree that they'll use some of their time to whine at me. Time they'll never get back. I've probably "stolen" several lifetimes from angry, stewing little weiners. :) HA. No more replies from me in this thread.

    9. Re:Mass Media Idiocy strikes again by jbelcher56 · · Score: 1

      Even though I hate them with a passion, people do "Learn" something in the home decorating shows. It just may not be something you (or I) are interested in. As far as your comment about the Hacker/Cracker distinction - I could not agree more.

      --
      Don't get off the boat. Absolutely, goddamn right.
    10. Re:Mass Media Idiocy strikes again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought TLC meant Tender Loving Care?

    11. Re:Mass Media Idiocy strikes again by somepunk · · Score: 1

      Get over yourself and RTFA. Whitehats and blackhats each got eight represenatives listed, and the distinction was mentioned several times, even using the term "cracker." I'd even say that Robert Morris is a grey case, tipping things to our side. They all seemed to be possessed of great technical ability, which is the primary requirement. Well, maybe not ESR :)

      They actually did a pretty admirable job, consiering all the UFO/psychic/unsolved mystery crap on those commercial "educational" stations.

      --
      Those people who think they know everything are a great annoyance to those of us who do. (Isaac Asimov)
    12. Re:Mass Media Idiocy strikes again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use the terms 'hacker' and 'cracker', but I think in general, 'cracker' isn't going to catch on. In the end it will be like witches. To paraphrase Glinda, "Are you a good hacker or a bad hacker"?

    13. Re:Mass Media Idiocy strikes again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do Merriam-Webster an injustice by refusing to accept a broader definition of the word hacker.

      Main Entry: hacker
      Pronunciation: 'ha-k&r
      Function: noun
      1 : one that hacks
      2 : a person who is inexperienced or unskilled at a particular activity
      3 : an expert at programming and solving problems with a computer
      4 : a person who illegally gains access to and sometimes tampers with information in a computer system

    14. Re:Mass Media Idiocy strikes again by br00tus · · Score: 1

      Yaa, God forbid some kid logs onto a computer that some corporate stooge has forbidden access to is compared to Steve Wozniak. Steve Wozniak used to go around selling blue boxes by the way, and he says he would have never created the Apple if he hadn't done that, he is a hacker in every sense in the word.

  4. I dunno by fjordboy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm not so sure about the validity of the list. Wouldn't the best hackers be the ones that pulled off a great hack that went unnoticed and the hacker didn't get caught? Just a thought...

    1. Re:I dunno by matth · · Score: 1

      No,
      If you don't get caught what's the point? You have to atleast get some recognition or there is no point in doing it.. no self gratification.

    2. Re:I dunno by fjordboy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      if you're simply hacking for recognition, then you should automatically be banned from the list.

    3. Re:I dunno by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Wouldn't the best hackers be the ones that pulled off a great hack that went unnoticed and the hacker didn't get caught?

      If it didn't get noticed, exactly what would you have done that was worthwhile? Like the yokels hacking into government honeypots and think "Wow, I'm a great hacker" Or do you think there's real Hollywood style hackers out there breaking into corporate computers to manipulate stock prices for the benefit of mystery charities (because Hollywood hackers would never do it to enrich themselves)

    4. Re:I dunno by matth · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What else do you hack for?
      You crack for information, you hack for recognition.
      Cracking is illegal.
      Hacking is very legal.

    5. Re:I dunno by fjordboy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      maybe hacking corporate computers to manipulate stock prices for the benefit of yourself. I mean, come on..there's gotta be some hackers out there that have gotten filthy rich from what they did but they knew well enough to keep their mouths shut about it.

    6. Re:I dunno by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      What else do you hack for?
      Gibsons.
    7. Re:I dunno by matth · · Score: 5, Funny

      Actually, as I'm thinking about it.. hacking is fairly easy.. I've watched several hollywood movies and I think that I am now certified to do hacking... infact let me see.. based on what I've learned you bring up an SSH prompt and then start banging away at keys and the password is always something like 'password', 'opensesame', or some random array of characters that you will just happen to hit with your hand... it's really very easy!

    8. Re:I dunno by wwest4 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      if you're simply hacking for recognition, then you should automatically be banned from the list


      The problem with this is that it's pretty difficult to prove the intent. I would bet that ALL of the named people were seeking recognition - be it widespread attention, approval, or disdain. Such a criterion would exclude people who should be on the list despite their shameless self-promotion... like Shimomura. There's a self serving, egomaniacal prick who is totally devoted to the craft and quite good at it.

      I think the list is pretty "fair and balanced." If anything, they are missing some people - Bill Gates is an obvious one, as previously mentioned.

    9. Re:I dunno by nicolas.e · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What else do you hack for?

      You hack for fun ( or else you are a dumbass ).

    10. Re:I dunno by Trigun · · Score: 1

      Great reference!

    11. Re:I dunno by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I've learned you bring up an SSH prompt [...]

      The login screens are usually much more colorful than a standard terminal.

      > [...] or some random array of characters that you will just happen to hit with your hand...

      Don't forget that it will usually only work on your second or third try.

    12. Re:I dunno by nicolas.e · · Score: 1

      I would bet that ALL of the named people were seeking recognition.

      I am not sure. At least not at the beginning.For example, Torvalds started linux thinking it will never get widely spread.

    13. Re:I dunno by fjordboy · · Score: 1

      It will also only work if you have 5 seconds left.

    14. Re:I dunno by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the password is always something like 'password'

      Actually, you'd be surprised how often that happens, on systems that don't check a requested password against requirements.

    15. Re:I dunno by Lehk228 · · Score: 3, Funny

      nah, in movies they just run GL_Hack a fully interactive OpenGL 3D GUI that removes all the difficulty from hacking, just drag the icon for each type of potential attack onto the representation of the computer you want to attack, if the icon turns from blue to red try a different attack, if it turns green double click the now green icon ann you will automatically rootkit the desired machine, and beware of the white points representing Admins, if they close in to the targeted computer before you disconnect and wipe the logs you will be caught

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    16. Re:I dunno by shystershep · · Score: 2, Funny

      SSH? Don't be fool. Every real cracker knows you use telnet.

      --
      The bigotry of the nonbeliever is for me nearly as funny as the bigotry of the believer. - Albert Einstein
    17. Re:I dunno by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I could have sworn there was a GUI and you just had to play a sort of video game. That's how it works in the movies I've seen.

    18. Re:I dunno by wwest4 · · Score: 1

      Who knows, maybe that's what motivated him to continue. In any case, who can authoritatively tell?

    19. Re:I dunno by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant
      I think the list is pretty "fair and balanced."

      No it isn't. ESR should not be in that list. The only reason he is, is because he made the list himself. Read the fine print at the bottom. Also he didn't create the Hackers Dictionary as is claimed in his bio, but thats a completely different rant.

    20. Re:I dunno by Mysticalfruit · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually, the truely great hackers would have a "?" where the photo is and would have a bio like

      Handle: "The Dark Sultan"
      Age: Unknown.
      Origin: Unknown.
      Location: Unknown.
      MO: Signs all hacks with a picture of an sultan holding a sword that's encrusted with microchips.

      Claims to Fame:
      Replaced all the photo data in the NSA's badge security system with pictures of bozo the clown.

      Inserted a software patch into AT&T's SINAP software that patched all directory assistance calls to the CEO's personal phone. ...

      --
      Yes Francis, the world has gone crazy.
    21. Re:I dunno by wwest4 · · Score: 1

      The "fine print" contains the photo credits. I don't think the jargon file issue eliminates him from the list, nor do his eccentric politics. His book alone qualifies him, as well as his numerous work on important open source projects.

    22. Re:I dunno by devphaeton · · Score: 1

      [b] Actually, as I'm thinking about it.. hacking is fairly easy.. I've watched several hollywood movies and I think that I am now certified to do hacking... infact let me see.. based on what I've learned you bring up an SSH prompt and then start banging away at keys and the password is always something like 'password', 'opensesame', or some random array of characters that you will just happen to hit with your hand... it's really very easy![/b]

      And if all else fails, be sure to just type something like "MANUAL OVERRIDE" all in caps. I've seen that work many times.

      --


      do() || do_not(); // try();
    23. Re:I dunno by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      you bring up an SSH prompt and then start banging away at keys and the password is always something like 'password', 'opensesame'

      Naw dude, you set the password is "Z1ON0101".

      disable grid nodes 21 - 48

    24. Re:I dunno by vinton · · Score: 1
      the password is always something like 'password'

      You might be surprised. A year into the development of a software project I was once involved with, we weren't sure it the app would even work if the admin user's password wasn't "password".

      And, yes, we did fix that bug, so don't bother trying it.

      Please.

    25. Re:I dunno by sparklingfruit · · Score: 1

      >> Hacking is very legal.

      Have you even read the DMCA?

    26. Re:I dunno by djiin · · Score: 1

      Only if your handle is Zero Coo... I mean Crash Override

    27. Re:I dunno by Lizard_King · · Score: 1

      You need to stop taking what the media spews about "hackers" verbatim and learn the true origins of the word.

      Hacking has nothing to do with recognition or being 1337. Read the Jargon File, especially the glossary entry about hackers and you'll learn that its a rather innocuous term and has been completely blown out of proportion (and hence lost its meaning) by the media. Unfortunately, most people (yes... including a lot of Slashdotters) are Lemmings and don't seek the truth on their own.

      --
      "My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son-of-a-bitch." - Jack Nicholson
    28. Re:I dunno by sam*stsw · · Score: 2, Funny

      Movies can teach us a lot. I learned how to hot wire a car from a Steven Seagal movie once. 1. Open the hood of the car. 2. Take the two bare wires and touch them together. That's it.

    29. Re:I dunno by SamSim · · Score: 1

      They were on the list initially, but they hacked the site and took down their names.

    30. Re:I dunno by SamSim · · Score: 3, Funny

      Everyone in films is so swish on computers. Hacking into the Pentagon computer... [computer noises] okay... double-click on "Yes"...

      Ooh, password protected! Twenty billion possible chances! Okaaaay... uhhhhhhh.... 'Jeff'.

      Hey!

      "How did you know?"

      "The guy who made this software was called Jeff Jeffty Jeff! And he was born on the first of Jeff, nineteen-Jeffty-Jeff..."

      ~Eddie Izzard, "Glorious"

    31. Re:I dunno by falsified · · Score: 2, Funny
      Have you guys ever noticed how much noise movie computers make? Every keystroke produces a liquid-sounding "bloop" or a high-pitched "BEEEP". I can't even stand when my computer makes a logoff noise. Movie computers are also far more dramatic - when the hacker gets into a system, red 10-cm high letters declare "ACCESS GRANTED!"

      ...actually. That part would be kinda cool. I'd feel like I'm actually accomplishing something whenever I log into Slashdot.

      --
      HI, MY NAME IS ISAAC.
    32. Re:I dunno by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, I am the best hacker of all time!

      Anonymous Coward

  5. Re:What about trinity? by sinucus · · Score: 1

    no, you got it all wrong... it was the IRS dbase! no h4x0r points for you.

  6. wont see their names... by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The mst deserving will NEVER be on a "list".

    as they were smart enough to play the game right and didn't do the stupid thing that get's a "hacker" fame... bragging about it.

    The absolute best hackers on this planet sit back and grin, but never say a word.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:wont see their names... by isaac338 · · Score: 1

      Like Andy of Mydoom fame, right?

    2. Re:wont see their names... by Stugots · · Score: 1

      The "old school" hacker might answer that being a hacker isn't something to be ashamed of. If the company on the rest of the list was cool, then being on the list would also be cool. And most of the names on that list are pretty cool, IMHO.

      Anyway, someone who really understands what they are doing (i.e. not a script kiddie, someone just cutting and pasting code) would be able to hide their tracks in any case -- regardless of whether they were on some list somewhere.

      Prediction: You'll never see any of the kids written about in that NYT article in this hall of fame.

    3. Re:wont see their names... by Savage-Rabbit · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The mst deserving will NEVER be on a "list...

      That is true! I feel Alan Turing and some of his colleagues deserved mention for breaking the Nazi's Enigma code. I suppose building a pioneering computer and helping to save the world from Fascism is way less important than the exploits of
      Kevin Mitnick.

      --
      Only to idiots, are orders laws.
      -- Henning von Tresckow
  7. Bjarne Stroustrup by savagedome · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Shouldn't Bjarne Stroustrup be on the list next to Ritchie and Thomson?

    1. Re:Bjarne Stroustrup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No. OO had been done before. C had been done before. Bjarne just took an existing language and made it OO; hardly a groundbreaking premise.

      Now, if you thought the guys who developed Smalltalk should be on the list you might be closer to the mark.

      I'd nominate Doug Engelbert perhaps, but then he was doing more human interaction and psycology work than he was hacking..

    2. Re:Bjarne Stroustrup by mirko · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What about James Gosling, then ?

      I personally missed Chuck.

      He is the most impressive of them all.

      --
      Trolling using another account since 2005.
    3. Re:Bjarne Stroustrup by epine · · Score: 5, Informative

      No way. This list consists of people driving their stakes in the lawless frontier. Stroustrup was a cultural innovator: the first person who took seriously the proposition of hybridizing conceptual elegance with grungy reality. Whereas Perl was biased more toward grunge, and Ruby was biased more toward elegance, C++ gives them both an equally bad treatment.

      Stroustrup might belong on a list of cultural forefathers of the computing era, a list which would also include Thompson and Richie. Note that I would not include Grace Hopper, Ken Iverson, or John Backus on this list because none of these languages were driven by cultural effects, although one could make a case for Grace Hopper.

      Larry Wall would be included on my list, and Edsgar Dijkstra, because they both had strong opinions about the cultural effects of programming practice. Knuth took a stab at it with literate programming, but he doesn't make my cut, it was too much shaped around his own unique mind. The internet protocol and the www were inherently cultural, so there would be nominations from both camps.

      I have one acid test I use to determine whether a language was strongly driven by culture, or whether culture was grafted on as an afterthought.

      Does the language allow constructs to get you out of places where you never should have arrived in the first place? The real world is full of those situations, usually because of a mishmash of influences from different sources. The anti-cultural languages are the ones which create proscriptions on the grounds that "no sane program would ever require that construct". The cultural languages are the ones that allow a feature on the basis that "if you get yourself into a mess of this nature, this construct might be your bridge of salvation while you survive to fight another day". Good cultural languages provide plenty of affordances to mitigate the unspeakable. Bad cultural languages slap you on the wrist "you should never have wound up here in the first place".

      Which is where I think the majority of languages conceived in university settings have failed. In universities, they seem to lack a deep unstanding of just how big a mess the real world can dump on your lap, where everyone involved was trying to make the best of a bad situation, and plenty of people involved were well aware of what should and shouldn't be done, but they wound up in bad place regardless.

      One could argue that Visual Basic was a cultural language, but granting an award for VB would be like adding the first person who ever sent a spam to the hackers hall of fame.

      Lest we forget: spam was a stellar hack. It exploited technical and cultural weaknesses within a system and its establishment to turn the system against itself. Hackers have a curious trait of not being too impressed by getting a dose of their own medicine, or admitting that it happened either.

    4. Re:Bjarne Stroustrup by The+Wannabe+King · · Score: 4, Informative

      The world's first OO-language was Simula, written by the Norwegians Kristen Nygaard and Ole Johan Dahl. Stroustrup acknowledges the influence of Simula in his book, but I don't think the language was well known outside the University of Oslo, where it was used in the first programming courses until 1999 when it was replaced by Java.

      So the two people really missing are Nygaard an Dahl.

    5. Re:Bjarne Stroustrup by FlashBac · · Score: 1

      Lincoln Stein has knocked out a couple of nice LOC too... perlers are the essence of hack anyway.

      --
      "Thats right buddy, the large print giveth, and the small print taketh away."
    6. Re:Bjarne Stroustrup by warrax_666 · · Score: 1

      No. C++ is an abomination. Although it technically has all the features of other languages, its syntax (esp. templates) and semantics (esp. for anyone doing optimization) are just horrendous.

      --
      HAND.
    7. Re:Bjarne Stroustrup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps, as C++ is quite a hack ;)

      Jokes aside .. perhaps that comparison would be valid if Bjarne created an amazing (and innovative) OS. ;)

      I think John McCarthy should be on the list (ha-ha, no pun intended). He was a major contributor to computer languages as we know them. Lisp was truly original.

    8. Re:Bjarne Stroustrup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Er, just found this link: What Made Lisp Different

      It points out .. er, well .. I think the article title is quite self explanatory. :)

    9. Re:Bjarne Stroustrup by red+floyd · · Score: 1

      I learned Simula 67 back in 1987. Cal State Northridge had it as part of the "Intro to Programming Languages" course (a 200 level course).

      --
      The only reason we have the rights we have is that people just like us died to gain those rights. -- Cheerio Boy
    10. Re:Bjarne Stroustrup by Rupert · · Score: 1

      Good cultural languages provide plenty of affordances to mitigate the unspeakable

      This is Slashdot. You might want to turn down the eloquence a bit. Very quotable, though.

      --

      --
      E_NOSIG
    11. Re:Bjarne Stroustrup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd take Alan Kay over Strostrup any day.

    12. Re:Bjarne Stroustrup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      bjarne stroustrup is just a script kiddie. Winnuke and stuff.

    13. Re:Bjarne Stroustrup by mandolin · · Score: 1
      Lest we forget: spam was a stellar hack. It exploited technical and cultural weaknesses within a system and its establishment to turn the system against itself.

      Did you know the first spam was created by lawyers? There ya go.

    14. Re:Bjarne Stroustrup by Engine · · Score: 1

      I learned Simula in my first OO-programming course at Stockholm University (Sweden) in 94. I was told that it had been used by several big companies (the one I remember is SAAB) at least in Sweden. It is a quite nice language, something like an OO-Pascal (have never tried delphi).

  8. Pet peeve... by AyeRoxor! · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Definitely a few names that probably don't deserve to be on the list"
    Definitely probably?

    /pick one

    1. Re:Pet peeve... by skarmor · · Score: 1

      Umm... theres nothing wrong with the original post.

      "Definitely a few names that probably don't deserve to be on the list" != "There are a few names that definitely probably don't deserve to be on the list"

      /learn the language

    2. Re:Pet peeve... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Processing...

      definitely = 1
      probably = .75

      definitely*probably = 1*.75 = .75 = probably

      Language conflict resolved.

    3. Re:Pet peeve... by Mr+Guy · · Score: 1

      Sorry the sentence doesn't resolve that way.

      That would imply that of all the names on the list, there is a probability that some do not belong. This isn't quite what the sentence says. What it actually says is that there are certain names on the list that most likely do not belong.

    4. Re:Pet peeve... by skarmor · · Score: 1

      Holy crap, how stupid are you? There have been several responses explaining why the original post was correct and yet you still fail to understand.

      Let's review.

      The original post said, "Definitely a few names that probably don't deserve to be on the list". So, there definitely were a few names on the list that were arguable; not all the names, but definitely a few. And, in the poster's opinion, those names probably don't belong on the list.

      Therefore, there definitely are a few names that probably don't belong on the list. Get it now?

      It's funny, I can just picture you reading this and furrowing your brow, in a desparate attempt to understand what's going on....amusing...

    5. Re:Pet peeve... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I definitely think you're probably a dork!

    6. Re:Pet peeve... by AyeRoxor! · · Score: 1

      What's amusing is watching someone who doesn't understand something venture forth and try to explain it. Furrowed brow, indeed! It's like being called a doodiehead by a 5-year-old. So cute!

    7. Re:Pet peeve... by skarmor · · Score: 1

      Look dude, I'm sorry that you don't understand the English language. Really, I am. The fact that you continued to argue this point long after you had been proven wrong is a testament to your own stupidity.

      But it is fun to provoke you, much like it can be fun to tease a pet dog with his doggie treats...

      C'mon, boy...C'mon..respond to my post...show me how smart you are...

  9. Obvious mistakes... by Noryungi · · Score: 4, Funny

    Straight from the article:

    Dennis Ritchie and Ken Thompson
    [...]
    An elegant, open operating system for minicomputers, UNIX helped users with general computing, word processing and networking, and soon became a standard language.


    Ah well. At least they got 90% of that article right... *sigh*

    --
    The right to offend is far more important than the right not to be offended. (Rowan Atkinson)
    1. Re:Obvious mistakes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh come on. What other operating systems have actually influenced popular culture by adding words to its vocabulary. How many other operating systems have created something as catchy as /dev/null. Maybe the description as a language is not so far off. In many ways language is what makes Unix so great. It has a simple, precise language for describing everything. The greatest of its abilities can be summarized with the bourne shell and macro language.

    2. Re:Obvious mistakes... by nursedave · · Score: 2, Informative
      Also from article:
      introduced the word "hacker" into the vernacular when he accidentally unleashed an Internet worm in 1988
      When I was a junior in high school, I wrote a paper about hackers. I was living in a podunk West Texas town and the term hacker was certainly in the 'vernacular' (that word always makes me think of worms) then; I graduated in '87. Methinks the authors sense of time, or his desire to 'sex up' his article, are off a bit.
      --

      The Democratic Party: We've been pussies since 1968!

    3. Re:Obvious mistakes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      influenced popular culture . . . something as catchy as /dev/null . . .

      Umm. I think you need to get out a bit more. Maybe talk to real live humans face-to-face instead of through a computer.

    4. Re:Obvious mistakes... by rafael_es_son · · Score: 1

      A couple of my faves:

      • "UNIX helped users with general computing, word processing and networking, and soon became a standard language."
      • "Citibank has since begun using the Dynamic Encryption Card, a security system so tight that no other financial institution in the world has it."
      • "Barlow is a tough guy to pin down. And that might make him one of the greatest hackers of all."
      --
      HAD
    5. Re:Obvious mistakes... by krygny · · Score: 1

      They also called GNU an operating system, and they still have Linus working at Transmeta.

      --
      Research shows that 67% of those who use the term "research shows", are just making shit up.
    6. Re:Obvious mistakes... by byolinux · · Score: 1

      What is GNU if it's not an operating system? I consider it to be one.

      It's far more of an operating system than Linux.

    7. Re:Obvious mistakes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I consider GNU to not be UNIX, and the HURD to be an OS

    8. Re:Obvious mistakes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ummm... no.

      GNU is the OS, and HURD is the Kernel. The Kernel is only a small part of the OS.

    9. Re:Obvious mistakes... by Jonner · · Score: 1

      Nitpickers need to be precise and correct themselves. HURD is not a kernel (though the GNU site itself makes the mistake of calling it that). It is a replacement for a *nix kernel which consists of userspace servers (HIRD of Unix Replacing Daemons) running on a kernel (currently GNU Mach).

  10. JEFF K! by Lieutenant_Dan · · Score: 3, Funny

    Man, I still remember when he rooted my VCR and had it constantly play Space Quest 2 for hours!

    --
    Wearing pants should always be optional.
    1. Re:JEFF K! by scovetta · · Score: 2, Funny

      Space Quest 3 was better. You could play Astro-Chicken.

      --
      Wer mit Ungeheuern kämpft, mag zusehn, dass er nicht dabei zum Ungeheuer wird. --Nietzsche
  11. Angelina Jolie? by grungebox · · Score: 5, Funny

    Is she in the hackers hall of fame? Perhaps Matthew Lillard as well? Where are AcidBurn and ZeroCool when you need 'em?

    1. Re:Angelina Jolie? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ZeroCool was played by Johnny Lee Miller. Matthew Lillard was Cereal Killer.

    2. Re:Angelina Jolie? by wizman · · Score: 5, Funny

      And along the same times, how about Matthew Broderick? Not only did he hack into WOPR for a game of global thermonuclear war in "War Games", but he also changed his grades in "Ferris Bueller's Day Off." Now that takes some talent.

    3. Re:Angelina Jolie? by peter_gzowski · · Score: 1

      Hugh Jackman could out-hack them all.

      --
      "Now gluttony and exploitation serves eight!" - TV's Frank
    4. Re:Angelina Jolie? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're going to go for movie 'hackers', Jason (the one with the ski mask) might deserve consideration.

    5. Re:Angelina Jolie? by FurryFeet · · Score: 1

      Matthew Laborteaux!
      You need to be old to get this one...

    6. Re:Angelina Jolie? by miyoo · · Score: 1

      It's been a while since I've seen either movie, but didn't he change his grades in War Games and his attendance record in Ferris Bueller's Day Off?

    7. Re:Angelina Jolie? by jsindell · · Score: 1

      He didn't change his grades, he changed the number of days he was absent. He actually changed grades in War Games to impress the girl.

    8. Re:Angelina Jolie? by Metal_Demon · · Score: 1

      Just for the record Matthew Lillard was Cereal Killer (as in Fruit Loops) Johnny Lee Miller was ZeroCool.

      --
      Trust Your Technolust
    9. Re:Angelina Jolie? by wizman · · Score: 1

      Yes, you are correct. It's been awhile on both movies for me as well. In Ferris Bueller, he changes the attendance while Rooney is on the phone with his mom.

  12. Huh? by black666 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Who is this Linus Torvalds guy?
    Must be one of those lunatics, who think they can write an entire OS and change the world ... yeahh

    1. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or write one program using someone elses tools combine it with elements of other oses and claim to have written an entire operating system. Oh and also inspire a revolution based on a license he refused to use originally. You mean one of those lunatics?

  13. But isn't language defined by usage? by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 5, Insightful
    If 99% of the world uses "hacker" in a negative context, I think the real hackers had better find a new term, because language is driven by those that use it. I feel your pain, but I think it's a losing battle. There's many cases of word meaning evolving from one thing to another.

    And one minor admonishment: just because home improvement isn't something that interests you does not mean it isn't learning. I got into home inprovement projects a couple years ago, and have learned a lot from those shows. Built my own deck and redid a bathroom all by my lonesome, and the results are beautiful. Even just home decorating is a pretty dense topic, with centuries of data and styles to consider.

    --
    --- Ban humanity.
    1. Re:But isn't language defined by usage? by hankwang · · Score: 1
      If 99% of the world uses "hacker" in a negative context, I think the real hackers had better find a new term

      But which term? An earlier discussion showed that alternatives such as "programming enthousiast" and "codesmith" do not really carry the same associations.

    2. Re:But isn't language defined by usage? by Bigman · · Score: 2, Informative

      Code Poet
      That's what I say :o)
      It confuses people, but they usually ask what you mean. And yes, I have bought the t-shirt!

      --
      *--BigMan--- Time flies like an arrow.. but personally I prefer a nice glass of wine!
    3. Re:But isn't language defined by usage? by naelurec · · Score: 4, Funny

      I think this quote from Office Space sums it up nicely...

      SAMIR: How come no one in this country can pronounce my name right? It's Na-gee-een-ah-jah. Nagaenajar

      MICHAEL: At least your name isn't Michael Bolton.

      SAMIR: Michael, there's nothing wrong with that name.

      MICHAEL: There was nothing wrong with it. Until I was about nine years old and that no-talent assclown became famous and started winning Grammys.

      SAMIR: Well, why don't just go by Mike, instead of Michael?

      MICHAEL: WHY SHOULD I CHANGE IT? HE'S THE ONE WHO SUCKS.

      ------> why should hackers change their name if others don't get it right? Thats nonsense. Besides, hackers would come up with a better term and the unenlighten will still lump hackers/crackers together.

    4. Re:But isn't language defined by usage? by grub · · Score: 1


      And one minor admonishment: just because home improvement isn't something that interests...

      Home improvement does interest me but there are lots of other channels for that (HGTV, etc) I used to enjoy TLC for the learning content. Now, though, they see the money in home improvement shows and have basically dropped any science-ish shows. Trading Space, While You Were Out, etc.. I don't know what they play now as I cancelled my cable TV service a while back.

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    5. Re:But isn't language defined by usage? by iron_weasel · · Score: 0

      Then the current usage is more like HAOX3R or some such geekspeak BUT not the revered(by many) Hacker wizard. HaCx0red for instance.

      Yet as I think on it a HACK is a quick, down and dirty, usually no documentation comments and not to be kept but just a fast 'workaround'.

      "Yeah it was failing in so and so module and I did a quick hack on it for now." A permament resolution would not be a "hack" if you were a resolute programmer.

    6. Re:But isn't language defined by usage? by TRACK-YOUR-POSITION · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You're being self-contradictory. Your arguing for a "language defined by use" definition of hacker, then objecting to "language defined by use" definition of "learning channel". Sure, watching a show teaching you how to decorate your home is technically "learning" in the dictionary, however to call a channel dedicated to home decorating and reality television "The Learning Channel" is a serious misnomer--which is why they never say "Learning" in the advertising for the station, opting instead for "TLC. Life unscripted" or whatever.

    7. Re:But isn't language defined by usage? by s20451 · · Score: 1

      why should hackers change their name if others don't get it right? Thats nonsense.

      You've elegantly summarized the basic problem with most classic-sense "hackers": Lack of awareness that the ideal world is not the real world, and the self-centered arrogance to think that the ideal world will take over simply because they embrace it.

      There are exceptions. I would argue that Linus is both pragmatic and humble, which is probably why he has done great things.

      --
      Toronto-area transit rider? Rate your ride.
    8. Re:But isn't language defined by usage? by automaticlarynx · · Score: 0

      Language is defined by usage, however, the argument goes that since the new definition of the word "hacker" has been put in place by people who know nothing about computers, it's a useless definition.

      It's like the way that most people call the U.S. a democracy. Anyone who knows anything about civics knows that the U.S. is a representative republic, not a democracy, and even though it's accepted by the hoards of the ignorant that the U.S. is a democracy, it's simply incorrect.

      Language isn't just defined by usage, it's defined by the educated through educated usage. If language were truly defined by all usage, then all regional slang would be have to accepted by the O.E.D. They don't accept regional slang, because doing so would be asinine.

      Anyway, I think that despite the bemoaning of the term "hacker" which has been lost to the masses, your average, law-abiding, computer geek guy actually likes being called a hacker because of the current, oblique criminal connotations of the word. It makes them feel like a space pirate or something. Just let them have their make-believe fun.

    9. Re:But isn't language defined by usage? by ktulu1115 · · Score: 1

      Keep that attitude up and you're nagga... nagga.. naggonnaworkhereanymore.

      No but seriously do you have a good point, people are going to lump us (I use "us" broadly) into a category anyway, no matter what the term we (or the public) coin. Just do your best, deal with the negative connotation people will give and try to stay out of federal pound-me-in-the-ass prison and you won't have too much to worry about.

      --
      # fuser -v /dev/attention | grep work
      #
    10. Re:But isn't language defined by usage? by FurryFeet · · Score: 1

      Of course, to follow your analogy, the rest of the world will cheerfully refering to the singer as Michael Bolton, while the programmer continues to suffer. Make of that what you will...

    11. Re:But isn't language defined by usage? by MyFourthAccount · · Score: 1

      Of course he also says later "You can call me Mike"

    12. Re:But isn't language defined by usage? by FunWithHeadlines · · Score: 1
      " If 99% of the world uses "hacker" in a negative context, I think the real hackers had better find a new term, because language is driven by those that use it."

      You know, you are correct about that. I make my living from words and I have quoted that rule to many people. And yet...and yet...this one just sticks in my craw. 99% of the world uses "hacker" in a negative context because they are ignorant of how it should be, and that just seems so unnecessary. Those of us (well, not me, I was never good enough to be a true hacker) who used the word in the right way saw all these ignorant media stories pushing the wrong definition and we tried to fight it. By educating others. That means speaking up in public forums. Telling friends and neighbors when the subject comes up.

      I've been doing this ever since "War Games" came out. I still do it because the hacker tradition continues, is a noble and proud one, and its members use the word the way it is meant to be used. It's not as if the rest of the world decided to use it differently, they just don't know any better.

      So for that reason I have not given up the fight yet. Might doesn't make right, even if it sometimes gets the dictionary writers to go along. As long as there are true hackers among us, I will call them by their true and preferred name.

    13. Re:But isn't language defined by usage? by The-Perl-CD-Bookshel · · Score: 1

      So, you think that stealing just a fraction of a penny is ok?

      --
      I don't keep a lid on my coffee so when I walk around I look busy -me
    14. Re:But isn't language defined by usage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If 99% of the world uses "hacker" in a negative context, I think the real hackers had better find a new term, because language is driven by those that use it.

      Well, in that case, I think we should all start calling computers "hard drives", and monitors "computers", because that is the terminology that 90% of people use.

      Oh, and while we're at it, we had better start calling Internet Explorer "The Internet" (as in "Oh no, the Internet won't start").

      I also suggest that System Administrators become formally known as "IT Guys".

    15. Re:But isn't language defined by usage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What I like most about that movie is that, when I saw it the first time, I immediately thought "isn't that what Richard Pryor did in Superman III?"

    16. Re:But isn't language defined by usage? by Grayswan · · Score: 1

      If 99% of the world uses "hacker" in a negative context, I think the real hackers had better find a new term

      But which term? An earlier discussion showed that alternatives such as "programming enthousiast" and "codesmith" do not really carry the same associations.

      Many words have two meanings depending on context. If 99% of the world uses hacker in a pejorative sense, fine. Coming from fellow hackers, here on Slashdot, at LAN parties, etc... it is a term of respect. Since the two "worlds" rarely overlap, the context (and thus the meaning) should always be clear.

      --
      If you open your mind too wide, people will throw trash in it.
  14. news? this is over three years old. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    check the wayback machine:

    http://web.archive.org/web/20010721134101/http:/ /t lc.discovery.com/convergence/hackers/bio/bio.html

    July 2001. I've seen this page in about every other google search i've ever done on one of these guys.

  15. I'm not on there? by Em+Emalb · · Score: 4, Funny

    Em Emalb

    Handle: (door knob)

    Claim to fame: A hacker of the old skool (fool), Em Emalb walked in off the street and got a job
    at McDonald's Artificial Meat Lab in 1975. He was an undergraduate at Hardees at the time.
    Disturbed that meat was murder, Em Emalb later founded the Free Meat Foundation.

    First encountered a computer: In 1991, at the place known as his bedroom. He was 16 years old.

    Unusual tools: In the 1980s Em Emalb left McDonald's payroll but continued to work from a register at McDonalds.
    Here he created a new operating system called GFries -- short for GNU's Fries really irritate everyone, sucka.

    Little-known fact: Recipient of minimum wage for several years.

    Current status: Em Emalb has just finished reading a book, Penthouse Letters, a tribute to hot sweaty sex.
    This book is available via Penthouse, Inc.

    --
    Sent from your iPad.
  16. Re:Bill Gates, Hall of Fame Hacker? (P.S. First Po by Aneurysm · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is very true, but would you consider Bill Gates more of a hacker or more of a businessman? I agree that Bill Gates has changed the face of modern computing an awful lot, but as a businessman than as any form of system hacker

  17. Good publicity / Bad publicity by dkleinsc · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't think people like Richard Stallman, Ken Thompson, and Eric Raymond want to be put in the same category as Kevin Mitnick and Cap'n Crunch. Lumping them together seems to me like an opportunity for Darl McBride to go "Look! All the Linux people are really crooked hackers!"

    --
    I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    1. Re:Good publicity / Bad publicity by goodbye_kitty · · Score: 1

      I think is due to confused double meaning of the word 'hacker' as used in the article.

    2. Re:Good publicity / Bad publicity by nomadic · · Score: 1

      Who cares? It's not like he'll be able to cite tlc.discovery.com in court. You all are way too concerned with PR. Trust me, I've met the kind of people who spend all their time obsessed with this kind of thing. They work in marketing. You don't want to end up like them.

    3. Re:Good publicity / Bad publicity by hetairoi · · Score: 4, Insightful

      while I'm sure most /. folk can make the distinction between bad guy/good guy/grey guy hackers I did find it disturbing that Woz is listed right after Vladimir Levin.

      Many hackers, including Woz, have delved into the dark side, if just to gain more understanding of it. But because of poor laws and public perception many good computer professionals get lumped in with criminals. Look at it this way, could Dennis Ritchie break into your computer and steal your credit card information? The answer is yes, he's a smart guy and if he put his mind to it he could likely figure out a way to do it. Most people would freak out and say he is an 'evul hacker' but just because someone has knowledge of how something works doesn't mean they will use it for criminal purposes. Would Dennis Ritchie actually do that? Certainly not, but not because he lacks the knowledge.

      To many people computer professionals are wizards. Casting archaic spells that create something from nothing on the screen in front of them. They don't understand it and they fear it. Just like in my last job as a network admin, the owner of the company found out I had access to all the accounting info. He wanted to limit my access to it and I had to explain to him the power I held over his network. I don't think it was comforting to him, but he did finally realize I had access to everything and why I had that access.

      So yeah, putting Stallman, Thompson, Ritchie and other non-lawbreaking profressionals into a list with with criminals and publicity seekers like Mitnick and Levin doesn't help the public image of computer folk in general. But it's hardly a fine line of good or bad. I do wonder though, if it were the 'Engineers Hall of Fame' would Said Bahaji be on the list?

      --
      you're all figments of my deranged imagination
    4. Re:Good publicity / Bad publicity by TheFrood · · Score: 1

      while I'm sure most /. folk can make the distinction between bad guy/good guy/grey guy hackers I did find it disturbing that Woz is listed right after Vladimir Levin.

      Yeah, if I were Woz I wouldn't want to be next to the guy who brought communism to Russia.

      Oh, wait...

      TheFrood

      --
      If you say "I'll probably get modded down for this..." then I will mod you down.
    5. Re:Good publicity / Bad publicity by Jasonv · · Score: 1

      To the ire of most geeks, the meaning of 'hacker' - according the the public - used to be: someone who broke into computers illegaly.

      This article uses it in the context of: Person who is famous/infamous for their computer expertise.

      Which is at least a step in the right direction.

    6. Re:Good publicity / Bad publicity by fuzzy's_world · · Score: 1

      I don't think people like Richard Stallman, Ken Thompson, and Eric Raymond want to be put in the same category as...and Cap'n Crunch.

      Well, maybe not the criminal aspects of Cap'n Crunch (John Draper). But understand, Draper was a damn smart hack even if much of what he did was illegal. He not only stumbled across the 2600 Hz-toy whistle, he actually had a portable, homemade phone switchboard (no joke!) in his van; that takes some smarts to build something like that.

      Also, Draper used Apple II computers to connect to networks such as ARPANET (the Internet/WWW ancestor) over the phone system decades before most non-computer scientists; he obviously had no "high speed" network access. Draper, believe it or not, wrote the first word processor (Easywriter) for the IBM PC. Draper understood the phone system in terms of tandems (like IP routers are to the Internet), undersea cables, and satellite links. If a person could *easily* do this with modern Internet equivalents, you'd say the guy was brilliant. Also, computer BBSes and Usenet didn't even exist yet.

      This is stuff we take for granted on the Internet today, but during the 1970s (before the break up of Ma Bell in 1984), phone-assisted computer communication was completely *illegal*.

  18. Too bad this "story" dates from Dec 2002 by Helevius · · Score: 0, Redundant
    This "list" is way old news. Try this search for "hackers" at TLC.

    I'm waiting to see the "repost" notice next.

    Helevius

  19. haiku by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    bill gates a hacker? now a job for real hackers: hack slashdot, fix it.

  20. Amusing what I found in the article by metroid+composite · · Score: 2, Interesting
    From the article itself:
    Eric Steven Raymond

    Eric Steven Raymond is the granddaddy of today's hackers, a man who revels in living the life in all its geeky glory. According to him, "The world is full of fascinating problems waiting to be solved."

    Annoyed by the fact that most people misuse the term "hacker," he wrote The Hacker's Dictionary and How to Be a Hacker. (Raymond says the basic difference is that "hackers build things, crackers break them.")

    Not only is he respected for his astounding skills as a programmer, but Raymond is also valued as a fierce defender of the Open Source Movement, which is based on the premise that programmers should be able to read and modify all software source codes. In this IT paradise, programmers would be able to improve software and fix any potentially lethal bugs. Steve Wozniak would be a god. Bill Gates would be the serpent.

    In addition to programming, Raymond is also a fan of libertarianism, neo-paganism and the right to bear arms.

    1. Re:Amusing what I found in the article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Yes, ESR was a source for the article. So of course he put himself in that list and had this to say about himself:
      Not only is he respected for his astounding skills as a programmer
      Trouble is, it just ain't true. He just wishes it was. ESR is most famous for "maintaining" the bletcherous fetchmail, and for pissing off the entire Linux kernel development community.
    2. Re:Amusing what I found in the article by DomCurtis187 · · Score: 1

      Raymond says the basic difference is that "hackers build things, crackers break them."

      It's always fuckin' whitey!

    3. Re:Amusing what I found in the article by Guillaume+Laurent · · Score: 1

      ESR has "astounding skills as a programmer". Yeah, that's amusing.

  21. Re:Bill Gates, Hall of Fame Hacker? (P.S. First Po by pcraven · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Not really. Bill's first pushes into computers were totally in the 'hack' world. He later graduated from that to business. Their BASIC interpreter was written totally by hand. They didn't have a computer. They took it to IBM and sweating bullets they put it in the computer and it ran. Can you imagine demo'ing a software product to the 900 pound IBM gorilla, but never actually getting a chance to run it first?

    I can't stand Microsoft and Bill really irritates me. But the work they did at first was truly in the hacker's work. I mean 8.3 file names, tell me that isn't a hack?

    (Ok, I defended Bill Gates, there goes my karma.)

  22. redundant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Though I agree with your point it is redundant...
    (Re-read the description of ESR...)

  23. old news by SignificantBit · · Score: 1

    and this is news? i'm pretty sure this site has been online for like a year.

  24. Re:Bill Gates, Hall of Fame Hacker? (P.S. First Po by inode_buddha · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I agree with the parent post about Bill bringing computing to the masses even though my earliest computing experiences have nothing to do with wintel or even PCs for that matter. IMHO BillG's single greatest hack isn't technological; it's social/business.

    --
    C|N>K
  25. Keven Mitnick by DigiShaman · · Score: 5, Informative

    Keven Mitnick will be interviewed for three hours tonight on Coast to Coast AM radio. Check the website for local station listings.

    http://www.coasttocoastam.com

    Ya ya ya, I know...off topic. But I had to...

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
    1. Re:Keven Mitnick by Unknown+Kadath · · Score: 1

      Coast-to-Coast AM? Formerly known as the Art Bell Show? Mitnick has legitimate complaints against the Justice Department, which is far too sane for that show. What's he going to talk about? How the government implanted secret tracking chips in his brain while they were holding him?

      That would be hilarious.

      -Carolyn

      --
      Like Daddy always said: if you can't dazzle 'em with brilliance, baffle 'em with bullshit.
    2. Re:Keven Mitnick by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

      Keven Mitnick will be interviewed for three hours tonight on Coast to Coast AM radio.

      Well...there goes any shred of credibility Kevin may have had left.

    3. Re:Keven Mitnick by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      He's been inteviewed before on that show. Keep in mind that Coast to Coast AM is purely entertainment. Sure, there are quite a few wack-jobs on that show. But hey, if the entertainment value is high, then it will show in the ratings.

      And yes, Mitnick is very serious. And by nature of him being a hacker, he will be entertaining.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    4. Re:Keven Mitnick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Mitnick has legitimate complaints against the Justice Department

      And what would those be?

    5. Re:Keven Mitnick by HeyLaughingBoy · · Score: 1
      Keven Mitnick will be interviewed for three hours tonight on Coast to Coast AM radio

      By who? Space Ghost?
  26. Re:Bill Gates, Hall of Fame Hacker? (P.S. First Po by imr · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The most famous hacker in their original team was probably Paul Allen.

  27. This is a really great article. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It clearly shows the direct connection between UNIX, Linux, the FSF, GNU, and C to criminal behavior around the world. The article shines new light on the subject by properly illuminating who the ring leaders of the worlds cybercriminals are.

    At keast that seems like the logical conclusion to dumping the worlds greatest computer innovators in with the worlds greatest computer criminals and then calling them all equal.

    Maybe I need to take another course in propositional calculus but I'm fairly certain that article is saying that creating UNIX or C was the technological and moral equivalent of robbing a bank.

    1. Re:This is a really great article. by denks · · Score: 1
      Maybe I need to take another course in propositional calculus but I'm fairly certain that article is saying that creating UNIX or C was the technological and moral equivalent of robbing a bank.

      Looks like you need another course in logic

      Its a list of people who have done something out of the ordinary using computer technology.

      Lets put it a different way. Lets chose a list of people who did something of note during World War II. Names that come to mind: Churchill, Roosevelt, Hitler, Stalin, Rommel, Montgomery, Patton. Following your logic, these people all have items of note during a specific time period in common, therefore they are all morally equivalent.

      Put in Java terms. A.X == B.X does not necessarily mean A.Y == B.Y

      --

      I am Monkey, the Great Sage, equal of heaven!
  28. Robert Morris???!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hacker hall of fame

    Well at least they got John Draper in there.

    1. Re:Robert Morris???!!!!! by mrkitty · · Score: 1

      Robert morris is the original internet worm writer. Without morris CERT.org wouldn't have been formed. He wrote the first internet worm that spread through solaris/vax vms systems.

      --
      Believe me, if I started murdering people, there would be none of you left.
  29. Re:news? this is over three years old. by troon · · Score: 1

    I first realised this was old when reading Linus's entry. He has three daughters these days.

    --
    Ydco co ,df C erb-y go. a Ekrpat t.fxrapev
  30. Re:Bill Gates, Hall of Fame Hacker? (P.S. First Po by elusus · · Score: 1

    Windows, Office,
    ... MSN??

  31. Bill Gates Punk Rock Hacker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft has lee law and my hack won
    I hacked the law and my hack won
    I needed the money 'cause I had tons
    I hacked the law and my hack won
    I hacked the law and my hack won
    gal guns
    I hacked the law and my hack won
    I hacked the law and my hack won
    I needed the money 'cause I had tons
    I hacked the law and my hack won
    I hacked the law and my hack won

    Robbin' people with a six gun
    I hacked the law and my hack won
    I hacked the law and my hack won

  32. Barlow by johnny_cobol · · Score: 1

    What the hell is Barlow doing on this list?

  33. program language inventor? or serial killer? by scubacuda · · Score: 2, Funny
    Not nearly half as informative as this site.

    Which hacked code? And which preferred to hack away at victims' corpses instead? :)

  34. Re:news? this is over three years old. by nomadic · · Score: 1

    Yep. If I remember back far enough it was posted at least once on slashdot too. Maybe twice.

  35. Cap'n Crunch by Eklypz · · Score: 3, Interesting

    How come they do not mention Cap'n Crunch running around all bug-eyed at raves in the Bay Area? Saw him going to them for up until I left the area in '96, came back in '03 and still raving. Sad thing is, few of my friends out there had ever heard of him :( Gives you perspective on our personal realities.

    --
    Life is everything but nothing.
    1. Re:Cap'n Crunch by dr_dank · · Score: 2, Interesting

      How come they do not mention Cap'n Crunch running around all bug-eyed at raves in the Bay Area?

      Probably for the same reason they omit his "energy workouts" that he was trying to get the younger boys at H2K to do with him.

      --
      Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
    2. Re:Cap'n Crunch by British · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No, the sadder thing is when I asked about the Cap'N showing kids how to do "crunch ups", and getting several replies confirming the rumor.

    3. Re:Cap'n Crunch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He was running around the rave scene in South Florida when I met him in the late 90s.

      seems like not much has changed, cept the locale :)

      still, a great man to sit and talk to. i was very honoured to meet him

  36. Those who didn't belong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What has John Perry Barlow done in terms of hacking? And Tsutomu Shimomura? One founded the EFF, the other was a sysadmin who detected his computers were being compromised by Kevin Mitnick. Those are a coupkle people who didn't seem to belong. Any others?

    1. Re:Those who didn't belong by Gavrilo+Princip · · Score: 1

      Well, you are half right. Barlow is a self-promoting, talentless poser. Shimomura, on the other hand showed some excellent skills in tracking Mitnick. He knows his stuff. He isn't just a 'sysadmin'. I believe you have him confused with Clifford Stoll, who fits your description.

  37. Cap'n Crunch by bsDaemon · · Score: 0, Troll

    Cap'n Crunch provided just as valuable a public service as RMS: showing the falicy of the "exchange value" concept. No one is hurt by making free phone calls with the bluebox just as nobody is hurt by using GNU instead of SUN. software has a use value but should not have an exchange value, meaning it ought to be free, and i do mean also free of charge. I don't like to pay for things. That said, I am using MacOS X 10.3 on an iBook G4 I got at the end of October. But I didn't buy any other software for it. I got free or pirated stuff to fill out what didn't come with this thing.
    Phone calls also should be free. ther is no reason why they should be paid for. The government should make people do the maintanance on the lines and money should be eliminated.

  38. Damnit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft has legal guns
    I hacked the law and my hack won
    I hacked the law and my hack won
    I needed the money 'cause I had tons
    I hacked the law and my hack won
    I hacked the law and my hack won

    Robbin' people with a six gun
    I hacked the law and my hack won
    I hacked the law and my hack won

  39. Nitpick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The three words UNIX helped users of 23 are actually 13 percent and not 10.

  40. Re:Bill Gates, Hall of Fame Hacker? (P.S. First Po by ivern76 · · Score: 1

    Gates is not a hacker, he traded in his keyboard long ago for an empty suit and a few billion. He belongs nowhere near that list.

  41. They forgot something! by Noryungi · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If I remember well, Robert Morris father (former NSA scientist if I remember well) also worked on Multics, the "ancestor" of UNIX.

    One day, programmers saw Rober Morris Sr go to a Multics console. He called everyone in the room to him. Then, once he had everyone complete attention, he hit three keys at the same time on the console... and crashed Multics completely.

    He then left the room without saying a word, leaving all the others scratching their heads...

    I don't know if the story is true, or what were the three keys he pressed, but with a father like that, it's no wonder young Robert Morris Jr ended up a hacker! ;-)

    --
    The right to offend is far more important than the right not to be offended. (Rowan Atkinson)
    1. Re:They forgot something! by meadowsp · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ctrl-Alt-Delete, I'd imagine.

    2. Re:They forgot something! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Crashing UNIX boxes by mashing on keys used to be a common trick back in the day. Of course, Multics was designed for security and Unix wasn't.

    3. Re:They forgot something! by tverbeek · · Score: 1
      crashed Multics completely .... I don't know if the story is true, or what were the three keys he pressed

      Ctrl-x-c?

      v-i-Enter?

      Ctrl-Alt-Insert?

      Command-Control-Power?

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
  42. Some background info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is a Hacker, the Timeline of hacker history, and the best book on hackers.

  43. Re:Bill Gates, Hall of Fame Hacker? (P.S. First Po by diersing · · Score: 2, Funny

    As well, he *hacked* the mouse away from IBM and *hacked* the GUI away from Apple.

  44. Hacker vs. Cracker by JohnGrahamCumming · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When is this stupid argument going to die? It's now totally pointless to try to force the definition of hacker to be someone who writes code and cracker to be what the mass media calls a hacker. Languages are living things and just because Eric Raymond would like to define hacker as it was at one point in time is irrelevant to current usage. Even conferences like H2K are more about hacking in the cracking sense than hacking.

    This is similar to trying to argue that the word gay is not associated with homosexual men now; it's time to get over the old definitions of words (particularly slang words) and move on.

    Otherwise we'd all be walking around using the word ace to describe things that are currently considered phat.

    John.

    1. Re:Hacker vs. Cracker by joshuaobrien · · Score: 1

      Because it's a living language in which definitions change is precisely why it isn't pointless attempting to change how 'hacker' is used.

    2. Re:Hacker vs. Cracker by SvendTofte · · Score: 2, Informative

      When I am with like minded people, I can still call things a clever/bad/brilliant hack. And if I tell someone, "damn, you're a hacker", I only say it, if I know that person takes it as admiration.

      Computing is, in some ways, a subculture, and as any other subculture, we can have our own sayings, traditions, and so on. If I talk with my dad, a hacker is a bad thing. When I talk with my CS fellow students, a hacker is something to be in admiration of.

      There is room for both.

    3. Re:Hacker vs. Cracker by FattMattP · · Score: 1

      That's whack, my dapper friend.

      --
      Prevent email address forgery. Publish SPF records for y
    4. Re:Hacker vs. Cracker by $lashdot · · Score: 1

      You mean "gay hacker" does not mean what I thought it meant?

    5. Re:Hacker vs. Cracker by santos_douglas · · Score: 1

      Just because it was a coincidence that I read this on the same day, Ed Felten thinks it's time to retire the term 'hacker'. People may not like it, but he's probably right. It's too late to change the perception.

    6. Re:Hacker vs. Cracker by MyFourthAccount · · Score: 1

      Well, it's particularly bad when they actually have this quote in Eric's little blurb:

      Annoyed by the fact that most people misuse the term "hacker," he wrote The Hacker's Dictionary and How to Be a Hacker. (Raymond says the basic difference is that "hackers build things, crackers break them.")

      In other words, they should have known the difference.

      In any case, the biggest problem is that they grouped two totally different types of people. I know I wouldn't want to be in a list where some of the pictures are actually police mug-shots.

  45. Re:Stealing the Mona Lisa... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I don't know.... you're pretty retarded without Bill Gates' intervention.


    Did your mom poke you with a coat hanger a few times before you were born?

  46. Re:Bill Gates, Hall of Fame Hacker? (P.S. First Po by rokka · · Score: 1

    Didn't they do a Forthran compiler for the Altair first? And then they got pissed of when the hackers at homebrew computer club shared it with each other. I do think Mr. Gates has done a great deal in computing but I do not consider him a hacker simply because he do not obey the so called 'hacker ethic' - that is, hack and share your hacks with whomever wants them.

    --
    I could be wrong. I'm always wrong...
  47. Linus Doesn't Work for Transmeta by Ridgelift · · Score: 1

    Article states Linus works for Transmeta...not anymore. He works for the Open Source Development Labs now.

    I'm glad Gates, Jobs and Ballmer are not mentioned on the list. Hackers build things, cracker break them, and ransackers like Gates sell broken things.

  48. an interesting story by bsDaemon · · Score: 4, Funny

    I read a book on the "masters of deception" many years ago. Phiber Optik became a major hero and roll model for me. I even got kind of good at using the aging telenet network to make free longdistance calls to Europe via global outdials. One of the characters mentioned in the book was also Robert T. Morris, refered to I believe just as 'rtm.' At about this time (i was 12) I started fiddling with FreeBSD, and eventually my uncle gave me a copy of RH Linux. I then started reading a lot of FSF propaganda. I started to confuse RTM and RMS. My fascination with RTM eventually turned itself into a fascination with RMS out of sheer stupidity on my part (hey, i was like 13. what the hell did i know). Then i started to think that RMS was full of it, went back to FreeBSD. Then i got turned on to communism by some fellow Irish Republicans, started to think RMS kickced ass, became as psycho HURD user, realised HURD was a piece of shit and bought a Macintosh. Now I get to be a hypocrit, especially since I am an ex phreak and [ex]decent programmer (i patched the vfat file system driver in the linux kernel once...that was about the height of my career), i've realised that i do infact hate the world wide web and now at the age of 20, after realising that computers are an instrument of fascism and that so-called "socialist" intellectuals and academics are all counter-revolutionary (Lenin, Mao, Chirac), I've quit school to become a carpenter so my fiance and i can move back to Ireland and have a nice country life and shoot loyalists. actually, this story kind of sucks....

    1. Re:an interesting story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hear ya buddy. Story of my life too except we're going to move back to the city, raise pigs and shoot squirrels.

  49. Re:MALDA TRIVIA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is this true? beacuse if it is, I DONT FUCKING CARE.

  50. Re:Bill Gates, Hall of Fame Hacker? (P.S. First Po by Frymaster · · Score: 3, Funny
    Windows, Office... MSN??

    • clippy!
    • bob!
  51. Discovery BIO Error: Linus Torvalds by stuffduff · · Score: 1
    I sent 'em a comment, since he's with OSDL now.

    It was an interesting site, and I was pleased to find out that I started using computers two years before that first guy there! ;^)

    --
    "Can there be a Klein bottle that is an efficient and effective beer pitcher?"
  52. Re:Bill Gates, Hall of Fame Hacker? (P.S. First Po by Aardpig · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Now, be honest. How many of us had our first computer experience with MS-DOS or Windows 3.1?

    Probably less than you might think. While our parents were doing boring crap such as wordprocessing on their drab IBM PC, we were hacking away on our Sinclairs, Commodores, Ataris, Amigas, Dragons, Tandys, Amstrads, Acorns, etc. Those were what the young computer geeks were using in the 1980s.

    --
    Tubal-Cain smokes the white owl.
  53. Torvalds (12 in the series)... by Pakaran2 · · Score: 1

    still works for Transmeta? That's news to me.

    1. Re:Torvalds (12 in the series)... by tverbeek · · Score: 1

      It's an old article.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
  54. So if 99% of people say 'supposably'... by sczimme · · Score: 1


    instead of 'supposedly', then that should be okay, too? I hope not.

    Think about ask vs axe, height vs heighth, and the rampant use of 'they' to denote a single person, and tell me that language should be defined by usage. (Not flaming - this issue bothers me.) People who know better should strive to use the language properly.

    A stupid/incorrect thing done by a million people is still a stupid/incorrect thing.

    Slightly [more] off-topic, but I have learned quite a bit about gardening/landscaping from watching 'Ground Force' on BBC America. The other decorating shows (e.g. Changing Rooms) seem to end up with fairly cheap-looking results. I know all the decorators are on a budget, but the outdoor projects seem to look more elegant.

    --
    I want to drag this out as long as possible. Bring me my protractor.
    1. Re:So if 99% of people say 'supposably'... by ProtonMotiveForce · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      But it's not incorrect. The definition of a word isn't defined by a small group of people. It's defined by mass media and common usage.

      But hey - argue with the dictionary all you want.

    2. Re:So if 99% of people say 'supposably'... by socode · · Score: 1

      There's nothing wrong with that use of the word "they", since using the correct alternative "he" leaves you open to being castigated by the "he or she" brigade.

    3. Re:So if 99% of people say 'supposably'... by William+G.+Davis · · Score: 1

      People use "they" and "them" as singular pronouns knowingly; it's done because there's no real gender-neutral singular pronoun available to us. Saying "he or she" or "him or her" is pain in the ass, as is having to twist your sentences around to avoid using a pronoun so you can sidestep this problem altogether.

      The "they/them" issue is a fine example of how language evolves over time to accommodate social change. In the last few decades, it's become less and less acceptable to use "he" and "him" as default pronouns because they denote the male gender, and since no real gender-neutral singular pronouns exist, "they/them" has stepped up to fill the void.

    4. Re:So if 99% of people say 'supposably'... by fair_n_hite_451 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A perfectly accurate gender neutral pronoun exists ... "it".

      However, people see it as somehow implying "non-person". Rubbish.

      --
      Reason why there is hope for the future generation #364:
      "I wish my grass was emo so it could cut itself."
    5. Re:So if 99% of people say 'supposably'... by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 2, Interesting
      instead of 'supposedly', then that should be okay, too? I hope not.

      Yes. Languages evolve. If that word evolves that way, then so be it.

      My favorite theoretical case is in Larry Niven novels where "bleep" and "censored" become actual swear words that will get you shocked looks in certain company.

      --
      --- Ban humanity.
  55. Re:Bill Gates, Hall of Fame Hacker? (P.S. First Po by Tarwn · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Got my vote. Then again I don't really follow what they're listing.

    I mean if we were listing hackers, there's a bunch of names that don't belong on there. If we were listing crackers, well, then the page has the wrong name (and has for some time).

    And for those of you that think the fact that Gates is a business man now, and that MSN should disqualify him, I have only this to say:
    Should we now start removing people from places like the baseball hall of fame after they retire?

    The fact is that they did something at some point to be honored in the hall of fame, it doesn't matter if they proceeded to never get on base again in the rest of their career.

    --
    Whee signature.
  56. Re:Bill Gates, Hall of Fame Hacker? (P.S. First Po by illuminatedwax · · Score: 2, Funny
    Their BASIC interpreter was written totally by hand. They didn't have a computer. They took it to IBM and sweating bullets they put it in the computer and it ran.

    Oh, how times have changed...

    What happened, Bill?

    --Stephen

    --
    Did you ever notice that *nix doesn't even cover Linux?
  57. Re:Bill Gates, Hall of Fame Hacker? (P.S. First Po by Trurl's+Machine · · Score: 5, Informative

    Not really. Bill's first pushes into computers were totally in the 'hack' world. He later graduated from that to business. Their BASIC interpreter was written totally by hand. They didn't have a computer. They took it to IBM and sweating bullets they put it in the computer and it ran. Can you imagine demo'ing a software product to the 900 pound IBM gorilla, but never actually getting a chance to run it first?

    Sorry, you are inaccurate in few important points. First of all, their "hacking" deal was not with IBM, it was with MITS, a small company in Albuquerque, the first to manufacture a microchip-based personal computer, the Altair with the 8080 CPU. It was featured as a cover girl, oops, cover story of Popular Electronics in 1974. That's how Bill Gates and Paul Allen got into the PC business. And they actually have had a computer - they had a 8080 emulator working on their university DEC machine. They didn't have actual Altair, because no one had it those days - the cover photo was a mock, MITS was just testing the water with a vaporware announcement (things haven't improved that much since the good ole 1974!).

    Nevertheless, squeezing a BASIC interpreter into the tiny 4K memory of the Altair was indeed a piece of fine hacking - even if the credit goes actually to Paul Allen rather than Bill himself.

  58. Wrongness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lets see. They list Richard M. Stallman. Good. Nice choice. Yea.

    Then they claim he wrote and OPERATING SYSTEM called GNU.

    Errr? GNU has a set of tools. Because of the lack of HURD progress and the adoption of the GNU toolset wholesale on top of a Linux kernel doesn't make GNU an operating system, nor does it make the GNU toolset "Linux".

  59. Re:Stealing the Mona Lisa... by fruey · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Bill Gates has done more to retard the computer industry than any man alive !

    You are so wrong about that. What Bill Gates (or at least Microsoft) did was to give computing to the masses. The PC revolution was completely Microsoft driven. They made stuff simple. They took away all the beauty of a real computer system, but they made it dead easy. They gave us:

    CTRL-ALT-DEL... Abort, Retry or Fail?... OK, Cancel... Press any key to reboot...

    That's all rubbish compared to proper error messages, but the upshot is that your Grandma can use a computer because Microsoft dumbed it all down enough and made it easy to work with PCs.

    Sure, they gained a monopoly too, and such a position of power as to exclude others... but their time will come, and their contribution will rise from the ashes as being a real, tangible one. Even if it was copied from elsewhere! It certainly didn't "retard" anything. Dubious business practices maybe, but you don't get to the top without stepping on a few people.

    Disclaimer: I prefer to run Linux, but I'm interested enough to work it all out, and fascinated by the intricacies. But it's not ready for your Grandmother yet.

    --
    Conversion Rate Optimisation French / English consultant
  60. Re:Bill Gates, Hall of Fame Hacker? (P.S. First Po by LowTolerance · · Score: 0, Redundant

    so what? it's not like unix was the first command-line driven OS.

  61. Re:Bill Gates, Hall of Fame Hacker? (P.S. First Po by leomekenkamp · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm a little annoyed with people saying things like: "Well, since person A was the first to do X, we would not be doing X right now, if it wasn't for A.".

    Without the Wright brothers, we still would have aeroplanes today. If Pythagoras died in infancy, someone else would have come up with A^2 + B^2 = C^2. If Bill Gates' mother did not have ties with IBM, someone else would have headed the company that provided IBM with an 'OS' for its PC.

    --
    Wenn ist das Nunstueck git und Slotermeyer? Ja! Beiherhund das Oder die Flipperwaldt gersput.
  62. Re:Bill Gates, Hall of Fame Hacker? (P.S. First Po by robnauta · · Score: 2, Informative

    8.3 filenames came straight from CP/M, just like the file control blocks it used. In MS-DOS 2 they switched to file handles instead.

  63. I owned a TRS-80 as my first machine too! by Sheepdot · · Score: 1

    I'm actually kind of surprised.

    I owned a TRS-80 as my first machine as well. Perhaps it's a pre-requisite to be a hacker.

    With that said, WHY IN GOD'S NAME is John Perry Barlow on this list? My god, I'd rather see mafiab0y on here than him. You do need to know how to use a computer to be a hacker, right? ...right?

  64. wake up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Bill Gates has done more to retard the computer industry than any man alive !"

    That's the most incorrect statement I've ever heard, and the worst part is as a /. reader you are probably smart enough that you should know.

    There is not any technology being developed today that isn't being built on technology that came before it. The real creator of the mouse driven graphical user interface didn't bring it to market, so Microsoft and Apple did. That was a good thing for everyone.

    It's was obvious anyway, and would have been developed by someone soon enough. There were already trackballs, menus, and graphics. Xerox flipped the trackball over to control a pointer that interacted with graphical menus.

    This seems like divine inspiration only if you don't know anything about computers of the era. All Xerox did was bring together existing technologies in a way that hadn't been done previously. The same thing that happens everyday around the world. You can think of them as genius if you like, but don't forget they didn't even think enough of their creation to keep it secret and try to develop something with it.

  65. "irregardless" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "irregardless" is a term used so often that it's found its way into the dictionary. But that doesn't keep those who use it from sounding uneducated.

    1. Re:"irregardless" by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 1
      If the word has been adopted to the point where it has a dictionary definition, then it's a valid word. The most ineffective and hopeless endeavor is language policing.

      Do you look down your nose at anyone who uses the word "quiz" for a test because it started out as a word for an odd or unusual person?

      --
      --- Ban humanity.
  66. Nomination by PMuse · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I hereby nominate this site for the Most Annoying Interface of All Time Hall of Fame. Do I hear a second?

    --
    "We reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals." --The American President (20.1.2009)
    1. Re:Nomination by Deusy · · Score: 1

      An annoying inferface and factually incorrect!

      (Linus works for OSDL now, not Transmeta as the article would have you believe.)

      --

      Free Gamer - Free games list and commentary

  67. Neal sez... by Onan+The+Librarian · · Score: 4, Interesting

    In his "In The Beginning Was The Command Line" Neal Stephenson had this to say : "Microsoft refused to go into the hardware business, insisted on making its software run on hardware that anyone could build, and thereby created the market conditions that allowed hardware prices to plummet. In trying to understand the Linux phenomenon, then, we have to look to not a single innovator but to a sort of bizarre Trinity: Linus Torvalds, Richard Stallman, and Bill Gates. Take away any of these three and Linux would not exist."

    He's right, y'know, though I'm not sure that should get Bill into the Hacker Hall of Fame.

    OTOH if you took out RMS, Denny & Ken, esr, and Linus, then added Bill, that gallery would appear more homogeneous...

    1. Re:Neal sez... by Endive4Ever · · Score: 1

      Gates and Microsoft further promoted the cause of Linux by their ever-increasing bloat-ware initiative with Intel and the clone vendors. In the period when Linux was coming into it's own there was a huge wake of older hardware on hand no longer suited for running the latest eye-candy from Microsoft, therefore extremely cheap and readily available for Linux and the freenixes.

      In the early 90's I had a few 'expensive' machines, i.e. 486DX machines, but I cut my 'networking' teeth running a bunch of copies of Slackware on a home-built subnet of 386sx boxes I got for almost nothing. There was a zero-entry-cost for experimenting with Linux primarily because the Bill-Ware forced so much decent hardware into early obsolescence.

      It's not that much the case now, as Linux distro producers seem to have caught the spirit of their 'eye-candy bloatware' commercial brethren, and the latest Linux OSes are just as piggish if not more-so than the Redmond offering, but back in ye olden times it wasn't so.

      --
      ---
    2. Re:Neal sez... by Onan+The+Librarian · · Score: 1

      Funny, I had a similar first experience. Windows wanted more & more hardware, at a time when everything was pricier than it is now. I couldn't upgrade to a Pentium, and I felt that my 486 just couldn't be doomed so soon, so I tried Linux via Slackware. After a little time with the system I was a convert.

      And I have to agree with you re: the current distro bloat. OTOH you do at least get damned near full value for your purchase, an evaluation I simply can't make for Bill's bloat.

  68. But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a lot more nerve racking to check that kind of list to see if you're on it.

  69. Re:Bill Gates, Hall of Fame Hacker? (P.S. First Po by lemox · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Bill CO-wrote BASIC with Paul Allen. If the list is primarily for technical expertise, Paul belongs on there more than Bill.

    --

    "We obviously need a new moderation category: (-1, Woo-fucking-hoo)" --Mr. AC

  70. Al Gore! by ^DA · · Score: 2, Funny

    Why isn't the inventor of the internet, Al Gore, on the list?

    1. Re:Al Gore! by suffocate · · Score: 0

      I'm honestly really curious as to why garbage like this gets modded up as funny. You couldn't possibly beat a deader horse.

      Does it get modded up because the moderators honestly think it's funny, or because they feel obligated to moderate up things that have previously been modded funny?

      Does the poster honestly think himself witty, or think it's an "obligatory" joke thus must be posted (karma whore)? Maybe the poster knows its a lame ass joke and wants to get the luser moderators to waste their mod points on garbage?

      thoughts?

  71. Re:Bill Gates, Hall of Fame Hacker? (P.S. First Po by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >> huge VAX mainframes

    Bwaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhh!

    How cute! He thinks a VAX was a "huge mainframe"!

    Huge mainframes were usually IBM S/370 models in those days.

  72. Re:Bill Gates, Hall of Fame Hacker? (P.S. First Po by nineoneone · · Score: 1

    OK, Gates was influential in the PC revolution and his place in history is assured.
    But, lets be honest, most of his best "innovations" have been either rip-offs or totally retrograde steps.
    Opportunistic, as well as (sometimes) brilliant, I would say.

    --
    sig under development
  73. Re:Bill Gates, Hall of Fame Hacker? (P.S. First Po by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    They didn't have a computer. They took it to IBM and sweating bullets they put it in the computer and it ran. Can you imagine demo'ing a software product to the 900 pound IBM gorilla, but never actually getting a chance to run it first?

    You what? You got an "Insightful" for getting it all wrong? Oh yeah, forgot this is Slashdot.

    MITS released the Altair 8008. Gates & Allen wrote a BASIC interpreter for the i8080 using an 8080 emulator on a CDC 600 computer (If I remember correctly) that Allen wrote using an Intel manual.

    Gates rang Roberts at MITS and told him they had a BASIC which was ready for him to run on his Altair and would he like to licence it from them? Roberts told them to bring it on down...but they hadn't finished it. They worked in it for two weeks until it sort-of worked and then Allen took the paper tape; which had never been tested on a real Altair; to MITS.

    Half way to MITS Allen realised they hadn't written a loader for their BASIC. The emulator didn't need one. He hacked one up with a pencil and a legal pad and went to MITS.

    He keyed in his (untested) loader. It worked, and he loaded the untested BASIC. It worked too.

    MicroSoft got the contract from MITS and went onto become the number one supplier of BASIC for Micro Computers.

    The rest is history. I suggest you try studying some of it.

  74. Re:Stealing the Mona Lisa... by iron_weasel · · Score: 0

    'THEY" did not give us CTRL-ALT-DEL for that was the contribution of IBM as lately heralded in the press when he left IBM from RTP in N. Carolina.

    Also the mouse they stole was IIRC from a Xerox Parc project. In IBM we were using graphic pads and wands with a button on the end to activate light sceen hot spots and such. We did have 'windows' before they were made public on the IBM3270PC (again IIRC-been a while). Gui's were all over the place. MSFT IMO can't claim credit for very much.

  75. Re:Stealing the Mona Lisa... by Dave21212 · · Score: 1


    In reply:
    APPLE gave us that 'grandma can use it' interface, not Bill Gates. Microsoft stole it.

    Intel and IBM started the PC craze, not Bill.

    Microsoft is everywhere because of anti-competitive (read: anti-American, anti-Capitalist) behavior in business, not due to innovation.

    As for error message, you have to kidding right (or just baiting?) - windows is notorious for lousy errors and unexpected reboots.


    Try again ?

    p.s. Would I be right in guessing that you are under 25 years old... you don't actually remember this stuff, it's just what you think you know, right ?

    --
    "Whoever would overthrow the liberty of a nation must begin by subduing the freeness of speech."--Benjamin Franklin
  76. Add Bill Joy by Czmyt · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Bill Joy deserves to be on this list.

    1. Re:Add Bill Joy by FePe · · Score: 1
      And Guy Steele. He is what I associate with a true hacker.

      Don't know why, but when searching for Guy Steele on images.google.com, this picture is shown on the first page...

      --
      "Until you do what you believe in, how do you know whether you believe in it or not?" -- Leo Tolstoy
  77. Re:program language inventor? or serial killer? by nicolas.e · · Score: 1

    Wow, I have much intuition, got 10/10

    "You could spot Hannibal Lecter in an open source conference in a matter of seconds" ;)

  78. Re:Bill Gates, Hall of Fame Hacker? (P.S. First Po by MuMart · · Score: 1
    Apple brought us the popular microcomputer (Apple 2).

    Apple brought us the modern desktop. (Apple mac)

    Bill gates founded a law firm, not a computer company.

  79. The Real Version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Drinkin' beer in the hot sun
    I fought the law and I won

    I needed sex and I got mine
    I fought the law and I won

    The law don't mean shit if you've got the right friends
    That's how the country's run
    Twinkies are the best friend I've ever had
    I fought the law
    And I won

    I blew george & harvey's brains out with my six-gun
    I fought the law and I won

    Gonna write my book and make a million
    I fought the law and I won

    I'm the new folk hero of the ku klux klan
    My cop friends think that's fine
    You can get away with murder if you've got a badge
    I fought the law
    And I won
    I am the law
    So I won

    P.S.- Slashdot 5uxXhorZ!

  80. Re:Bill Gates, Hall of Fame Hacker? (P.S. First Po by iocat · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Damn, I have mod points and I was really looking mod up anyone who bashed Tsutomu Shimomura, who is a grade A tool IMHO, but I gotta say this:

    Paul Allen may be more 'techie' but BASIC for the Altair, as well as their previous projects, like the Traf-O-Data stuff, were really, really, joint collaborations. It wasn't a Wozniak/Jobs relationship, where one guy did the tech stuff and the other guy did the marketing. They *both* did the tech stuff, but Bill was more comfortable doing the business stuff as well.

    Check out the Tandy Model 100 -- it's a super elegant piece of early portable computing with a great (for the time) BASIC-enabled OS. Creating that system was Bill Gate's last project that he personally pulled off alone, and it is really a fantastic system.

    You may be able to have issues with his later business practices, and I'd agree that he was never part of the hacker culture, as evidenced by his early concern for copyrights when others were sharing everything, but the guy could definitely pull his weight on the code side.

    --

    Dude, I think I can see my house from here.

  81. Re:Bill Gates, Hall of Fame Hacker? (P.S. First Po by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    most of the member of my freesoftware group actually don't claim ibm pc's. Something the surprised me aswell. I started on a commodore 128. I do know a lot of people in the CS program who's first experience was windows 95, but none of them are hackers. They have no love for computers. Just the money they can make them.

  82. What a Horrendous Website by sirReal.83. · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Disclaimer: This is roughly 90% OT.

    This site is the top of the pile in the (not all that new) game of "let's see how tiny i can make the article space on the page!!!!" with its gargantuan, 120x600px ad on the right, the even larger navigator on the left, and the Java (WHY?!?) navigator on top for the article. Let's ignore for the moment that using Java for that is completely unecessary and wasteful, and focus on how the foolish thing rotates while you're reading. If you can't read each hacker's bio in 5 seconds, you're gonna have to click the arrows a few times just to find where you left off!

    Are they trying to piss off these legends with their own abysmal "hacking" skills?

  83. Stallman's handle by FePe · · Score: 1
    They state that Richard Stallman uses his own name as his login name or "handle":

    Handle: None (nothing to hide!)

    but doesn't he use "rms"?

    --
    "Until you do what you believe in, how do you know whether you believe in it or not?" -- Leo Tolstoy
  84. Ron Jeremy by snatchitup · · Score: 1

    Is it me? Or did TLC accidentally mix up their photos from their Porn Hall of Fame?

    There's an uncanny resemblence between Stallman and Jeremy. Was this a mixup?

  85. Offtopic by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    But it seems that the page with the article crashes the new firefox .8

    With 3 seconds of investigation it apears to have something to do with a Realplayer add.

    I must test this elsewhere...

    --

    "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
    1. Re:Offtopic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am running firefox .8 and the page worked fine

    2. Re:Offtopic by back_pages · · Score: 1

      I just used Firefox 0.8 to view the entire content of the article and had no problems, but perhaps I wasn't shown the Realplyer ad. There was a bunch of obnoxious Flash, of course.

  86. Re:Stealing the Mona Lisa... by Trurl's+Machine · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You are so wrong about that. What Bill Gates (or at least Microsoft) did was to give computing to the masses. The PC revolution was completely Microsoft driven. They made stuff simple.

    Sorry, but I doubt you can back it up with any real historical knowledge. Microsoft entered the PC revolution because IBM was seeking contact with Gary Kildall of the CP/M fame. IBM wanted to run CP/M on their computers and asked Bill Gates to arrange a meeting of the IBM representatives with Kildall. Instead, Gates offered them his own deal.

    History of the PC would look quite similar without Bill Gates. We would have CP/M-86 instead of MS-DOS and GEM Desktop instead of MS Windows. There would be no actualy difference for anybodys Grandma.

  87. Linus by Espectr0 · · Score: 1, Funny

    He's married with two daughters.

    He is married to his 2 daughters? That's sick dude!

    1. Re:Linus by dmh20002 · · Score: 1

      or maybe he's a mormon and married to someone elses two daughters.

  88. Youngsters these days by NixLuver · · Score: 2, Interesting
    LOL! No, my first computer experience wasn't with M$ stuff. My dad was a mainframe technician in 1966, and we built our first computer from chips (with a wire wrap tool, if anyone remembers that stuff) and discrete components (based on the 8080A) in the early '70s. Later came an Altair. It wasn't until '86 that I had a PC compatible machine - an 8086 Business Partner with a 10 MB Hdd, 1MB ram (640k + expanded, IIRC), a monochrome VGA card (!), and a - wait for it - 1200 baud modem that I got from my dad. Of course there was only one BBS in town with a 1200 baud line then.

    Bill, I think, is a business man, and maybe a manager; call him a social engineer, and I'll buy it. But to put him in the same group with Dennis Ritchie and Linux Torvalds? I just don't buy it.

  89. John Carmack? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He sure had a big inpact on another side of computing, games

    Well, it's a top 15, ther's no room for everyone

  90. Re:Stealing the Mona Lisa... by fruey · · Score: 2, Informative
    Apple gave us "the Grandma can use it" interface, yes, but Microsoft sold it to her bundled with her new PC.

    Intel and IBM shipped home PCs running which OS? Anyone? MS-DOS? What did the MS stand for?

    I wasn't talking about BSOD errors, which don't mean anything (I have frequently said to clients that those error numbers don't mean anything, even to MS developers, I'm pretty sure it's an "in" joke where they put random memory register references converted to decimal). I was talking about stuff where disks and whatnot aren't readable. Try it in Linux, you'll get something complex like 'cannot mount /dev/fd0, unrecognized file system' which says more to me, but less to Grandma.

    Oh, I am older than 25. I do remember my first PC. It was ~2MHz I think, a single 5.25" floppy, single density 360KiB formatted disks. MSDOS v5 or so, and 128KiB of RAM. Monochrome CGA display. Something along those lines, anyway, don't have exact spec. and I may be wrong about MSDOS version.

    For every flippant point I make, there may be a counter argument. But the fact remains, love it or hate it, Microsoft can take some credit (even if that means admitting they were the schoolyard bully) for where computing is today.

    --
    Conversion Rate Optimisation French / English consultant
  91. Re:Bill Gates, Hall of Fame Hacker? (P.S. First Po by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A mouse is a piece of hardware. I doubt they *hacked* it away from IBM. Xerox developed the GUI, Apple had nothing to do with it.

  92. Re:Bill Gates, Hall of Fame Hacker? (P.S. First Po by Endive4Ever · · Score: 2, Insightful

    No, actually, a lot of us had cheap PC clones that we'd put together from parts. I was running a BBS on an 8088 machine with 640K, a 5 meg HD, and a 1200 baud modem. It had a member list in three digits and at it's height sponsored a bowling league (not just a bowling team). You guys with your cheap plastic-case computers were there, too, but you shouldn't discount the PC people as just doing 'boring crap.' Some of you were connecting to my board.

    Of course, I was a grown-up (in my 20's) in the '80s, I guess if I'd been younger I would have been seriously involved in the toy computers, rather than just having a few around to fiddle with, while doing practical things with PC clones.

    --
    ---
  93. Re:Bill Gates, Hall of Fame Hacker? (P.S. First Po by Trurl's+Machine · · Score: 2, Offtopic

    Probably less than you might think. While our parents were doing boring crap such as wordprocessing on their drab IBM PC, we were hacking away on our Sinclairs, Commodores, Ataris, Amigas, Dragons, Tandys, Amstrads, Acorns, etc.

    Quick generation check: what will happen with the screen if I'll type POKE 53280, 0 on a commodore-64? ;-)

  94. Re:Bill Gates, Hall of Fame Hacker? (P.S. First Po by TimeZone · · Score: 1

    Don't forget the Adam/Colecovision, man!
    TZ

  95. Mitnick the hacker, as an actor and professional by Vermy · · Score: 1

    I vote Kevin Mitnick as my number 1. As his resume not only includes real life hacking, but he also enjoys the irony of it all as he played a CIA hacker who installed a backdoor into the network of SD-6 on my favorite show Alias (Episode: Doppleganger).

    Anyone else have any shows/movies he's made a sneak appearance in playing a role close to real life?

  96. Re:Bill Gates, Hall of Fame Hacker? (P.S. First Po by Coward+the+Anonymous · · Score: 1

    "Those were what the young computer geeks were using in the 1980s."

    I was a young computer geek in the 1980's and I got my start on a Tandy 1000 running DOS 2.0 I think. That was about 18 years ago and too long for me to remember!

    --
    -- Jason
  97. Ah yes, the GNU "operating system" by Dorktrix · · Score: 0, Troll

    I am not sure if I am the only one, but the last time I tried to boot into gcc and the gcc utilities on my x86 processor, nothing happened. It wouldn't even boot. Weird... Said something about "no kernel found."

    The neat thing is that I wrote a small C program the other day that organizes my contacts, it did the same thing when I tried to boot into it. I must have written an operating system, too!

    Seriously, RMS has TLC drinking the koolaid, too...

    1. Re:Ah yes, the GNU "operating system" by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Ever heared of Hurd? That's the GNU kernel.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    2. Re:Ah yes, the GNU "operating system" by Dorktrix · · Score: 1

      Somehow the "created the GNU operating system" (past tense) on the TLC web page did not convey the fact that, yes, GNU has in fact tried to create a kernel barely functions and no one uses.

      Even as late as 1990, RMS admitted that "we aren't doing any kernel work. It does not make sense for us to start a kernel project now, when we still hope to use Mach" (see the source of this quote).

      Obviously, RMS thinks GNU is an "operating system" without a kernel, as illustrated by the diatribe on Linux on the GNU home page. And that is what I was mocking in a fun, Slashdotty, flamebait sort of way.

    3. Re:Ah yes, the GNU "operating system" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just some old info on GNU OS. It was runing on the sun kernel before linux was writen.

      So it is called GNU/Solaris.

  98. Re:MALDA TRIVIA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Too many people don't care anymore these days.

  99. Uhhhhh....... by MasTRE · · Score: 3, Funny

    From the article (enjoy):

    "Vladimir Levin
    ...
    Unusual tools: Along with a computer, computer games and disks, Russian police confiscated a camcorder, music speakers and a TV set from Levin's apartment."


    Wow, a TV is indeed an unusual tool. Especially in communist Russia! (wait, it's no longer communist - someone tell Washington!) Was it a color TV? And "music speakers," you say? God damn, that's unusual! More unusual than the author's strange vocabulary.. Almost makes one think if he's a RUSSIAN SPY!

    "Current status:
    ...
    Citibank has since begun using the Dynamic Encryption Card, a security system so tight that no other financial institution in the world has it."


    Why does this feel like I'm reading the New York Post? Or is it a comic book that I'm thinking of? Or is it Da Source? That shit's tight, cuz!

    Another gem:
    "Richard Stallman

    Handle: None (nothing to hide!)"


    Is this article written by the gov't? Jeez. A shame that this passes for journalism in this country.

    I just stopped reading this junk after the first page and randomly-clicked Vladimir.

    --
    Must-not-watch TV!
    1. Re:Uhhhhh....... by black+mariah · · Score: 1

      It's not journalism, it's a short biography on a few notable computer hackers. I wasn't aware that TLC and the Discovery Channel were supposed to be hardcore journalistic endeavours. They don't have a fucking thing to do with journalism. If you're going to complain about journalistic practices on a fucking TV channel's website, let's also bitch a little bit about the shit posted on /. as well.

      --
      'Standards' in computing only impress those who are impressed by things like 'standards'.
  100. Re:Bill Gates, Hall of Fame Hacker? (P.S. First Po by sp67 · · Score: 3, Informative
    Microsoft brought desktop computing to the home user.


    Not quite. It was IBM's marketing force that accomplished this feat - it was the PC that mattered, MS-DOS just happened to be there. It got spred with no effort from Gates' part, aside from the initial trick of selling something he didn't have, to IBM. Windows then followed in MS-DOS' tracks, people took it by inertia (with a little help from MS's anticompetitive practices), not because there weren't better alternatives.


    It makes me sick to hear ignorant people playing Gates' song, where he's the hero who put the PC and the internet in people's homes; to see it modded +5 Insightful on Slashdot is just too much!

    --
    Tuff that Smatters.
  101. Re:Bill Gates, Hall of Fame Hacker? (P.S. First Po by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Now, be honest. How many of us had our first computer experience with MS-DOS or Windows 3.1?"

    Nope, first time I got to touch a computer it was the Commodore Pet, then the Colecovision Adam (not a 'real' computer, I know, but you were able to run programs on it using basic), Vic-20, Commodore 64c, Commodore Amiga500, THEN Windows.

  102. Re:news? this is over three years old. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Yeah, and he's married to two of them! *Shudder*.

  103. Re:Bill Gates, Hall of Fame Hacker? (P.S. First Po by maeka · · Score: 1

    Don't forget the TI 99/4A!

  104. Re:program language inventor? or serial killer? by FePe · · Score: 1

    It's easy. Just look for glasses.

    --
    "Until you do what you believe in, how do you know whether you believe in it or not?" -- Leo Tolstoy
  105. Re:Bill Gates, Hall of Fame Hacker? (P.S. First Po by back_pages · · Score: 1
    Commodore VIC-20, then briefly on a second hand ZX-81 which never really worked, and then a 486SX 25MHz with Windows 3.1. I was five years old when I was first playing with the VIC, too young to understand any code, but I was still copying games out of the magazines character by character. I never did it right, but I got enough of the work done that a parent could correct the typing in about an hour giving me with yet another computer game to play. Those were the days.


    I was born in 1980. How many people got their first computer experience with Microsoft? I dunno, them young kids, most likely. Not me, I come from class.

  106. scariest. photos.evar. by spoonyfork · · Score: 2, Funny

    This top X list reminds me of that funny game Programming Language Inventor or Serial Killer?. (warning: flash site).

    --
    Speak truth to power.
  107. Re:Bill Gates, Hall of Fame Hacker? (P.S. First Po by byolinux · · Score: 1

    I think that's much more true in Europe, perhaps.

    Most Americans I know, had their first experience on Apple II machines, and later, Macintosh.

    My first experience of any computer at all, was a Tatung Einstein, which belonged to a neighbour of mine. About a year later, I began tinkering with a BBC Master at school. In 1990, I got an Amstrad CPC 464 and my school got a couple Acorn Archimedes A3000s. I still have my CPC (heavily upgraded) and a few others I've bought over the years.

    It was amazing some of the stuff I created back then, as a child of about 10. I had the beginnings of my own assembler, some really cool GUI tools and even a platform game I started writing.

    Now I work doing web R&D, accessibility and usability stuff, and I've just realised how much I miss the old days.

  108. Re:Stealing the Mona Lisa... by bonch · · Score: 1

    You could say that about anything. "History of Open Source would look quite similar without Linux Torvalds. We would have AthenaOS, or Minix, or widespread FreeBSD-adoption."

    Seriously, you could do that to any historical figure. If Rosa Parks wasn't going to stand her ground on the bus, someone else would have eventually. But they didn't--she did.

  109. Re:Stealing the Mona Lisa... by fruey · · Score: 1
    That GEM desktop link is cool. It's the first thing I've read that proves that the desktop that shipped with my Amstrad PC1512 and my Atari ST was indeed the same product.

    Yes, you can argue that PC history would look similar without Bill Gates. But would your Grandma be using a multimedia machine today (and not tomorrow) without Microsoft's massive "marketing before secure, bug free computing" campaign?

    --
    Conversion Rate Optimisation French / English consultant
  110. Grandmother Arguments by Vraeden · · Score: 1

    Why is it all so important that OUR grandmothers can use computers now!
    Since when did they become the ultimate consumer market.
    My grandmothers are dead for goodness sakes!!!

  111. Re:Bill Gates, Hall of Fame Hacker? (P.S. First Po by Alioth · · Score: 1

    Microsoft was almost incidental, pushed through by the inertia of the x86 chip (and more by the cheap IBM clone).

    Apple had all this ease of use years before Windows 3.0 (the first usable version of Windows). Microsoft didn't innovate this ease of use - they copied others. Microsoft rarely innovate - they merely popularise ideas that are already out there. It's the cheap IBM clone and good marketing that made Microsoft - not ease of use. Witness the popularity of MS-DOS in its day when there were much more user-friendly platforms out there.

  112. Re:Bill Gates, Hall of Fame Hacker? (P.S. First Po by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Ahh, the Tandy 1000. 8088 (I believe) with two 5 1/4" floppy drives, and 16 color graphics. By the time I finally got rid of mine, it was 5 or 6 years old, and had a hard drive (50 Megs) and a 3 1/2 floppy drive. I felt so proud.

  113. That doesn't resume it all by Via_Patrino · · Score: 1

    That doesn't resume it all, a hacker definition I like is "someone that can extract the maximum of a computer resource" (NYC hackers) and that involves not just coding but also using already avaible software and hacking hardware.
    And also there's the hackers who made the tcp/ip protocol (I think it was Richie) I don't think coding isn't a good definition to it either.

  114. Re:Bill Gates, Hall of Fame Hacker? (P.S. First Po by ktulu1115 · · Score: 1

    Amen to that.

    He may be brilliant, but a brilliant business man - A man who knows how to work the system and make money, like most of coporate america ::spit::... a far cry from the normal hacker.

    --
    # fuser -v /dev/attention | grep work
    #
  115. Re:Bill Gates, Hall of Fame Hacker? (P.S. First Po by bonch · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Computer geeks of the 80s are outnumbered by all the young computer geeks of the 90s who got turned onto computers because of the old MS-DOS/Windows 3.1 combination. Hell, there are still QBASIC user groups out there online, living up the nostalgia and still making games.

  116. Von Neumann, Knuth, Turing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why are they not included?

  117. Not that simple. by TRACK-YOUR-POSITION · · Score: 3, Insightful
    A hacker isn't just someone who writes code--it implies a very disorganized, chaotic approach to writing code or dealing with any formal system or machine. Thus, some crackers are also hackers. Which is why the distinction must continue to be made--there is a viewpoint that all computer programming that is not done on the payroll of a CMM Level 5 Corporation or Government is somehow shady, immoral, and illegal. To accept that definition of hacker is to accept that any playfulness involving computers (except that occuring within authorized video games) is at best borderline criminal. To let "this stupid argument die" is to condemn Linux itself.

    Languages are living things, and languages are powerful things. Languages can control people, languages can liberate people. Gay people understand that, hackers would be wise to understand it to.

    1. Re:Not that simple. by bonch · · Score: 1

      A hacker isn't just someone who writes code--it implies a very disorganized, chaotic approach to writing code or dealing with any formal system or machine. Thus, some crackers are also hackers.

      You're missing the point. You're still trying to use the Slashdot definition of hacker/cracker. To the entire rest of the world, a hacker is what you would call a cracker. It's pointless to discuss some sort of difference between the terms.

      The whole hacker/cracker thing is just old Linux veterans trying to feel cool and be called "hackers" without doing illegal things. The rest of the world isn't gonna buy it because RMS said so, sorry.

    2. Re:Not that simple. by TRACK-YOUR-POSITION · · Score: 1
      You're missing the point. You're still trying to use the Slashdot definition of hacker/cracker. To the entire rest of the world, a hacker is what you would call a cracker. It's pointless to discuss some sort of difference between the terms.

      No, YOU"RE missing the point. You stopped quoting me as soon as I got to the point--is that where you stopped reading? It's not just a matter of pickiness over words or wanting to look cool--it's stopping the media, the government, all organized authority from equating playful behavior with criminal behavior, in all walks of life.

      The whole hacker/cracker thing is just old Linux veterans trying to feel cool and be called "hackers" without doing illegal things. The rest of the world isn't gonna buy it because RMS said so, sorry.

      I dunno, most of the dictionary.com entries linked to above at least gave both definitions, sometimes insisting on a distinction. Language is power--giving up words is giving up everything.

    3. Re:Not that simple. by Sangui5 · · Score: 1

      CMM Level 5 Corporation or Government

      The only two entities I have ever heard claim a CMM 5 are NASA and Lockheed Martin. CMM 3 is a sign of a very mature development process, and only rarely reached. 5 is almost unattainable. The vast majority of software, even corporate produced commercial software, is written in a CMM 2 or lower environment. Basically, you are profering that there is a viewpoint that essencially all computer programming is shady, immoral, and illegal.

      On the other hand, from empirical evidence, none of Microsoft's products are developed at a CMM of 5. Does that mean we can assume their stuff is shady, immoral, and illegal?

    4. Re:Not that simple. by TRACK-YOUR-POSITION · · Score: 1
      I was exaggerating. I was tempted to say "CMM Level Bajillion", and in retrospect that might have made more sense. But I used to work for one of the places you mentioned (uh, I mean a friend of mine did, or something else equally vague enough to protect my pseudonym), and, to be perfectly honest, I think it's all crap, but I've said too much already for me to expand upon that...perhaps its just a case of "I refuse to be a part of any club that would have me as a member, but I don't put much stock in CMM Level 5 actually indicating good code is produced.

      So yeah, I recall everyone swelling with pride when it was announced we were the first to be CMM Level 5, and whenever something was broken we'd always mention that ironically.

  118. Re:Stealing the Mona Lisa... by freshman_a · · Score: 3, Informative

    They gave us:

    CTRL-ALT-DEL...


    Um, I thought David Bradley of IBM gave us that...

  119. Unlikely company for RMS by alexborges · · Score: 1

    Dont you think?

    --
    NO SIG
  120. Linus ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i like the quote from the site about linus:

    "He's married with two daughters."

    if you're not natively speaking english ...

  121. Re:Stealing the Mona Lisa... by IckySplat · · Score: 1

    Sorry ...
    IBM never released a 'home' machine,
    they were targeted at small business
    And they shipped it with PC-DOS
    Back in those days MS-DOS was the cheap 'n nasty
    clone :)

    Bugger, I'm getting too old for this

    --
    Help! help!, the termites are eating my DRAM!!!
  122. I didn't know ... by maxwell+demon · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... that Linus is bigamist: "He's married with two daughters." :-)

    --
    The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  123. WRONG! think for yourself (was Re:Al Gore!) by spoonyfork · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why isn't the inventor of the internet, Al Gore, on the list?

    OMFG, I'm sofaking sick of this stupid joke. First of all, it isn't even true. Secondly, anyone that keeps repeating it sounds like a moron. MORON.

    I'd use mod points to bring the parent post down but no doubt some meta-moderator will be cluesless and mark my moderation as 'Unfair'. Oh, the irony.

    --
    Speak truth to power.
    1. Re:WRONG! think for yourself (was Re:Al Gore!) by zulux · · Score: 1



      Gore's Quote is

      During my service in the United States Congress, I took the initiative in creating the Internet.

      What the truth is..

      As a Congressman, I made sure that taxpayer funding for deveopment of the Internet was given to the geeks who could invent and expand it

      Takpayers and Geeks created the Internet, not Al Gore.

      --

      Moneyed corporations, non-working 'poor' and criminal prisoners are turning productive citizens into tax-slaves.

    2. Re:WRONG! think for yourself (was Re:Al Gore!) by _xeno_ · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Yes, in the Revised Democratic History, Al Gore did not claim to invent the Internet.

      Unfortunately, in a little place called reality, he did. He said, and this is a direct quote from the page you link to, "I took the initiative in creating the Internet." Hell, the Snopes page, even though it marks it false, concludes with:

      ...even though Congressman, Senator, and Vice-President Gore may always have been interested in and well-informed about information technology issues, that's a far cry from having taken an active, vital leadership role in bringing about those technologies. Even if Al Gore had never entered the political arena, we'd probably still be reading web pages via the Internet today.
      Despite the fact that it may not quite be "invented" he still took credit for something he didn't really do! I'm a little confused as to why this is marked outright "false" and not the more accurate "sort of" mark that Snopes sometimes uses. Gore took credit for something he really had no part in. Yeah, the exact phrase "invented the Internet" is probably incorrect but even the "correct" phrase is an outright lie.

      And in any case, lighten up. It was a joke. Gore isn't in any political arena right now, and it doesn't hurt anyone to make fun of one of the many boneheaded things Gore said that lost him the 2000 election.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little relative jumps, all alike.
    3. Re:WRONG! think for yourself (was Re:Al Gore!) by spoonyfork · · Score: 1

      I'm a little confused as to why this is marked outright "false" and not the more accurate "sort of" mark that Snopes sometimes uses. Gore took credit for something he really had no part in.

      Granted Gore's choice of words left him open to misunderstanding and ridicule but I am more right than wrong that the "invented" joke is a stupid lie. Morons repeat the joke this way. If they wanted to be funny and accurate (which helps with humor), at least say "Al Gore says he took initiative in creating the Internet!". Then I would laugh along with the moron in question.

      ... boneheaded things Gore said that lost him the 2000 election.

      Talk about Revised Republican History. You know as well I as do that nothing Al Gore said lost him the election. A little thing called the Supreme Court and the great state of Florida did that. No use bitching about it now though, eh?

      --
      Speak truth to power.
    4. Re:WRONG! think for yourself (was Re:Al Gore!) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, fine.

      Now, in the interests of equal time &c, you can point out every time George Bush has made a statement that wasn't 100% accurate.

      All of them.

      I'm waiting.

  124. Re:I call him Pickles by cynicalmoose · · Score: 1

    They said his name was rtm, but as far as I recall that was just his username that people fingered when they tried to find out who had actually written it. I think he only started using it himself afterwards.

    But I wasn't in computing at the time.

    --
    Exercise your right not to vote. thinkoutside.org
  125. Re:Stealing the Mona Lisa... by Trurl's+Machine · · Score: 1

    You could say that about anything.

    Not really. There are genuine inventors, who manage to shape the technology - say, Henry Ford. Or Douglas Engelbart, inventor of the mouse and GUI. However, this is not the case of Bill Gates and the PC revolution. There was no actual difference for computer users between MS-DOS and CP/M. In fact, MS-DOS was purposedly designed to mock some CP/M's features, like the dreadful 8+3 filename convention. Then Bill Gates managed to copy the desktop paradigm from Apple and Xerox machines, but anyone could do it - and the company that created CP/M did it to, with GEM Desktop.

  126. Re:Bill Gates, Hall of Fame Hacker? (P.S. First Po by paRcat · · Score: 1

    for me the sequence was:

    VIC-20 -> a brief stint with C64 and the first Mac -> Atari 520 ST (!) -> and I skipped the x86's until I got a 486/25 DX.

    No real meaning to all this, I just thought I'd chime in. :)

  127. Re:Stealing the Mona Lisa... by ktulu1115 · · Score: 1
    Oh, I am older than 25. I do remember my first PC. It was ~2MHz I think, a single 5.25" floppy, single density 360KiB formatted disks. MSDOS v5 or so, and 128KiB of RAM. Monochrome CGA display. Something along those lines, anyway, don't have exact spec. and I may be wrong about MSDOS version.
    Yeah... I'd have to say you're definately wrong about that. MS-DOS 5.0 was released around the era of the 386DX/486 or so, can't recall exactly. I know I had a 486DX4 when Winblows 95 came out so it has to be somewhere around the time of the 386 when DOS v5 was out. If you were using DOS it was probably v1.0 or something close to that (that I definately don't remember very well).
    --
    # fuser -v /dev/attention | grep work
    #
  128. Re:Stealing the Mona Lisa... by Trurl's+Machine · · Score: 1

    Yes, you can argue that PC history would look similar without Bill Gates. But would your Grandma be using a multimedia machine today (and not tomorrow) without Microsoft's massive "marketing before secure, bug free computing" campaign?

    Can you say "Apple"? ;-)

  129. Re:Stealing the Mona Lisa... by Endive4Ever · · Score: 1
    Intel and IBM started it, but by the late 80's IBM had kicked on the brakes and was trying to kill the monster they had created. They'd brought out the Microchannel PS/2 line and were pushing OS/2 as the 'next generation' alternative.

    Apple gave us the 'grandma can use it' interface but wanted to make sure only rich grandmas could afford it. They along with Lotus introduced the culture litigation and legal hassles to the market with their ill-fated 'look and feel' suit.

    It seems like you might be one of those people trying to spread some of those historically revisionist myths:

    IBM was cool, OS/2 and Microchannel Architecture was bigtime progress and not IBM's attempt to drag the world back into a proprietary box they owned.

    Apple (post-Apple ][, which was neat, but the Apple corporate types killed it for the big-bucks Mac) made cool stuff that the geeks and nerds respected.

    Yeah, we know you were around back then, but stop lying to the younger folks like you're the wise grandpa. IBM sucked, and tried to kill the clone market when they lost control of it. Apple did their best to make sure the market was securely controlled by marketing people and computers were expensive fashion accessories.

    We (the rabble) were all rooting for Bill's vision of computers everywhere for cheap. Thank goodness IBM failed (though the Microchannel architecture had technical merit, it was poisoned by IBM's tight control on the 'standard.'). Thank goodness Apple lost the look-n-feel lawsuit, or the few of us who could afford computers would all be using terrible-quality pre-OSX Macs (they wouldn't have had any motivation to change, the old MacOS developers were arrogant and stubbornly clung to their ways for years and years and still would if they could).

    Don't cop an attitude and tell stories that aren't the truth to the younger folks.

    --
    ---
  130. Bill Gates and the Handheld TRS-80 by The+Breeze · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Don't forget, supposedly the last bit of code that Gates wrote largely by himself was the code that allowed the handheld Radio Shack TRS-80 to run - a massive thing so tough that you could skip it on concrete without it breaking, and that is STILL in use today in harsh industrial environments (oil rigs, etc) because A. it has an RS-232 port and B. the thing is TOUGH - and they use it to collect data from things and dump it into more powerful computers.

    The guy wrote software for consumer-grade hardware that is still in use 20+ years later - he may be a putz, but he can hack.

    -Steve

    1. Re:Bill Gates and the Handheld TRS-80 by Endive4Ever · · Score: 1

      Note that these are some of the machines being referred to. I am not selling any of this particular gear, just putting it out as reference to possibly interested others. Watch for Model 100 gear on eBay, it's fairly common as it is/was a popular machine. These aren't the lowest priced listings I've seen. It's damned bombproof hardware, and in some people's opinion, the first laptop PC.

      --
      ---
    2. Re:Bill Gates and the Handheld TRS-80 by NutscrapeSucks · · Score: 1

      I have a Model 100 here -- it's fairly well constructed, but it's still a hunk of consumer plastic. I'm pretty sure I could destroy it by throwing on the floor a few times.

      Maybe you are talking about some industrial model that I'm not aware of.

      --
      Whenever I hear the word 'Innovation', I reach for my pistol.
    3. Re:Bill Gates and the Handheld TRS-80 by HeyLaughingBoy · · Score: 1
      I have a Model 100 here -- it's fairly well constructed, but it's still a hunk of consumer plastic. I'm pretty sure I could destroy it by throwing on the floor a few times.

      Maybe you are talking about some industrial model that I'm not aware of.

      No, he's probably talking about the same one you have. I had one (inherited from my first job when we threw a bunch away) and even though made from cheap looking plastic, it's pretty rugged. We used them as test bench machines and they got banged around, dropped on the floor, poked with soldering irons and worked just fine. Until a few years ago, mine was used to control the AC and heat in my apartment. I tossed it when I moved.
  131. Re:Bill Gates, Hall of Fame Hacker? (P.S. First Po by paramecio · · Score: 1

    Excuse me, I'm sorry because it is written in Spanish, but you should read this.

    If true, this article explains why Mr. Gates is, speaking about computers, but a lamer. It seems he did nothing about MSDOS but buying it from Seattle Computer (it was developed under the name QDOS after Quick and Dirty Operating System). And the article also explains how Gates did just half the job with the BASIC interpreter.

    It's a real shame this article is not English, but I bet you can find tons of info just by googling...

    Please note that I am calling him a lamer in the computing context only, he just happens to be among the best burglars, and he also proves as a good candidate to rule a tight dictatorship. In fact this task is actually one of its main occupations, and he's succeeding pretty well. But all this success is usually easy to reach, with poor or little skills, when provided with enough moneypower... You know!

  132. Re:news? this is over three years old. by identity0 · · Score: 1

    No shit, I remember printing out those photos for a presentation I gave on hackers for high school speech tournaments. That must have been 3 years ago at least, and I recall the site was old back then, too. I also remember the site used to be ugly as hell and just basic HTML, though. At least it has some of the only photos I could find on guys like Mark Abene or that Russian guy.

  133. The crackers encountered computers in their teens by FePe · · Score: 1
    When you seperate the crackers from the hackers, you'll discover that all the crackers' first encounter with a computer was in their teenage years or in their childhood. John Draper, Mark Abene, Robert Morris, Kevin Mitnick, Kevin Poulsen at least. But also Linus Torvalds and many other of the hackers. There is a connection between how addictive you are to computers and how much you played with them in your teens. And I guess it's just another form of teenage revenge. What seperates crackers from hackers is how the technology is used.

    I first encountered and played with computers in my childhood, so it looks like I have great potential.

    --
    "Until you do what you believe in, how do you know whether you believe in it or not?" -- Leo Tolstoy
  134. Re:Stealing the Mona Lisa... by chooks · · Score: 2, Funny

    Press any key to reboot...

    Crap! I'm still looking for that damn 'any' key.

    Now if only I can get someone to fix the cupholder on my computer...

    --
    -- The Genesis project? What's that?
  135. Re:Stealing the Mona Lisa... by DR+SoB · · Score: 1

    "p.s. Would I be right in guessing that you are under 25 years old... you don't actually remember this stuff, it's just what you think you know, right ? " Funny you should say that, I know some under 25's that had pre XT computers (read less then 8 mhz). Think about it, yes they would have been around 8-10 yrs old, but so what? It really isn't rocket science to load using a boot disk, now is it??

    --
    Mod +5 Drunk
  136. Re:Bill Gates, Hall of Fame Hacker? (P.S. First Po by the_mad_poster · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I think the issue at hand isn't whether Bill Gates WAS a hacker. Obviously, Bill and friends were at one point even if they aren't now. The point of contention is whether or not his hacking was actually significant enough to warrant putting him in a HOF, or if his significant contribution is actually in the realm of business and that's just getting confused with his hackish start.

    I mean, is introducing a ground-up BASIC interpreter that most people don't know about as significant as Condor's "work"? Cool as it may be, I'll bet more people know about Mitnick's exploits than Bill's. Tough call, really.

    --
    Alito: A vote for Alito is a punch in the eye to put that bitch back in her place!
  137. Handles? We don't need no Steenkin' HANDLES! by chmod · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm mildy amused and peeved that for rms under "Handle" it says "none" and then on the next page it gives handles for Ritchie and Thompson (Their logins, just like rms!) there is rtm but not esr...

    Bah!

    Then as you peruse the other persons listed the author drops the whole classification scheme altogether. I think up against a deadline perhaps.

    So, no more time for posing, time to crank out the (junk) article/feature. BAH!

    I first started using UNIX systems by the courtesy of rms. His account on the *.ai.mit.edu cluster was unprotected by a password and his MOTD would welcome you and suggest you set up a profile and a DOTDIR variable to keep your rc's and other state within.

    It was GREAT. Can you imagine such a thing? After some time he had to stop this and I'm sure it killed him to do it.

    This author is (as usual for "journalists) treading in deep water and is lost. Why even try to be l337 and act like you know what or who a Hacker is or what a Cracker is contrasted to a Hacker and What Crackers were also Hackers, etc...

    Since I'm in Virginia I suppose I'm a Cracker Hacker. :) The article's author would never understand the subtlety. *sigh*

  138. Re:Bill Gates, Hall of Fame Hacker? (P.S. First Po by segmond · · Score: 4, Insightful

    He was once a hacker, read "Hackers" by Steve Levy.

    They wrote it without having a machine, they had instruction set for the 8080 chip, and a Popular eletronics schematics, they had to make it fit in 4k of memory, and they had to make it less since the memory needed space to hold programs/data.

    page 221. "but Gates in particular was a master at bumming code, and with a lot of squeezing and some innovative use of the elaborate 8080 instruct set, they thought they'd done it"

    Gates speaking, "We rewrote the assembler, we rewrote the loader ... we put together a software library"

    so, in his early days, he was a hacker, more so than many slashdot people are in respect to things today.

    --
    ------ Curiosity killed the cat. {satisfaction brought it back | it didn't die ignorant | lack of it is killing mankind
  139. Re:Bill Gates, Hall of Fame Hacker? (P.S. First Po by byolinux · · Score: 1

    I never had, and never want to have, a C64... However, I believe it was the same as the BORDER command in better BASIC. It was definitely colour related. I remember seeing it in lots of Osborne type in books from the library.

  140. Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The only two I think of as hackers on that list are Ian and Woz, but that's just my $0.02.

    Neither Linus or RMS has done anything really technically splendid, one is a great project leader and the other a complete asshole; but that doesn't really make them hackers.
    Even worse, why the hell is that fake fuck ESR on that list? He's even worse choice than Linus and RMS.

    Ian on the other hand does some really technically cool stuff today.

    I would really like to have seen Dave Hayne on that list, he's the king, and I'm not even an Amiga fan.

  141. Re:Bill Gates, Hall of Fame Hacker? (P.S. First Po by ktulu1115 · · Score: 1

    And obviously you know SO much posting as an AC... coward.

    --
    # fuser -v /dev/attention | grep work
    #
  142. a similar list by squarefish · · Score: 1

    can be found here

    it's much more humorous. from the page on john draper: Formerly a Phone Phreak, now a dentally-challenged and odorous wreck...

    --
    Creationists are a lot like zombies. Slow, but powerful and numerous. And they all want to eat our brains.
  143. Hacking gets you cute girls? by peter303 · · Score: 1

    Was the most interesting statement in the History section of the same site. This refers to the Matthew Broedrick 1983 movie War Games.

  144. Re:Bill Gates, Hall of Fame Hacker? (P.S. First Po by illuminatedwax · · Score: 4, Informative
    If Pythagoras died in infancy, someone else would have come up with A^2 + B^2 = C^2.

    Especially since he didn't first discover it.

    --Stephen

    --
    Did you ever notice that *nix doesn't even cover Linux?
  145. Because you cannot win by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 1

    "Hacker" has evolved into what it is. You will never "enlighten" the general public. You might as well try to hold back the tide.

    --
    --- Ban humanity.
    1. Re:Because you cannot win by Endive4Ever · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Yes, but folks like him can and do define themselves by their denial. He can claim to be one of the 'elite' who are holding back the tide. It gives him the distinct feeling that he's part of a subculture, without having to actually hack code or anything.

      --
      ---
  146. Re:Bill Gates, Hall of Fame Hacker? (P.S. First Po by ultrasound · · Score: 1

    Absolutely. My first 'computer' was my dads Sinclair programmable calculator in the mid 70's. Oh the joy of programming in moonlander, not much of a GUI though.

    Then I graduated to the ZX-81, wow, a whole 1K to play with. Then expanded it to 16K, gosh, how am I ever going to write a program to fill that? Then onto IBM-XT, AT, with lots and lots of K, and lots of Hz.

    But here I am, 30 years later writing code for microcontrollers with a few Kb of ROM and a couple of hundred bytes of RAM running at 10Mhz. Plus ca change.

  147. old by panic911 · · Score: 1

    Not only is this page extremely old.. I think I read about it from slashdot over a year ago.

  148. WTF by judicar · · Score: 1

    Also not mentioned:
    Zero cool
    Acid Burn
    Lord Nikon

  149. Gates is *not* on this list by blorg · · Score: 1

    From reading the first post, I honestly thought Gates *was* on this list. I kept pressing 'next' after John Perry Barlow, and the list would just bounce back to the start. I thought this looked like some sort of Gates protection mechanism in Opera, but no - after firing up IE (and typing in the URL), I can confirm he's just not on the list.

  150. Re:Bill Gates, Hall of Fame Hacker? (P.S. First Po by Endive4Ever · · Score: 5, Insightful

    by his early concern for copyrights when others were sharing everything,

    Actually, the 'others' who where 'sharing everything' were not the copyright holders. The user community of the time was widely sharing things that weren't theirs to share. Bill spoke up, but his company wasn't the only victim of said 'hackers.' There was plenty of other commercial software being spread around without paying for it.

    And the 'hacker culture' comes from a different social set than the early 'home computer' enthusiasts anyway. The 'hacker culture' comes from the computer labs of Universities. The 'homebrew computer' culture was a seperate social set entirely.

    --
    ---
  151. Re:Bill Gates, Hall of Fame Hacker? (P.S. First Po by Endive4Ever · · Score: 5, Funny

    In his early days Gates was a hacker, more so than a lot of self-described Slashdot 'hackers' whose only tools are a phillips screwdriver (because they're 'hardware experts') and Linux installation CDs (because they're 'software experts').

    --
    ---
  152. me me me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why am I not on the list?

  153. Re:Stealing the Mona Lisa... by Dave21212 · · Score: 1


    That's great info, unfortunately, I didn't say any of those things you attribute to me ! I agree that IBM was a monster back then, OS/2, as cool as it was, was just an attempt by IBM and Microsoft to own the OS (OS/2 became NT, which became XP...) And I couldn't stand Apple back then... they required you to buy the "Apple Printer" for the Mac I, at like 5 times the cost of a clone printer, which seem just unfair.

    My point was that Bill Gates is not a hacker and Microsoft basically stole those ideas. That, my friend, is still the truth today. RTFC

    --
    "Whoever would overthrow the liberty of a nation must begin by subduing the freeness of speech."--Benjamin Franklin
  154. ESR's "astouding" coding skills... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...gave us what? Fetchmail?

    Wow, help me take off my bra!

  155. Linus still at Transmeta? by SlashDread · · Score: 1

    I guess OSDN is not a -real- job...

    "/Dread"

  156. Spam and hacking... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Exploitation of trust and a forging of information does not a hacker make.

  157. Re:The crackers encountered computers in their tee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not sure how addictive to computers I am, but I would say that i'm fairly addicted.

  158. Re:Bill Gates, Hall of Fame Hacker? (P.S. First Po by The+Almighty+Dave · · Score: 1

    Turns the screen or the border black? I remember sys64738 resets the system, but I've forgotten most, maybe all, of the C64 stuff.

  159. Re:Bill Gates, Hall of Fame Hacker? (P.S. First Po by buzzbomb · · Score: 1

    Quick generation check: what will happen with the screen if I'll type POKE 53280, 0 on a commodore-64? ;-)

    Who cares? Commies suck. Apples rule.

    Keeping it real...80s style! :D

  160. Re:Bill Gates, Hall of Fame Hacker? (P.S. First Po by tverbeek · · Score: 1
    what will happen with the screen if I'll type POKE 53280, 0 on a commodore-64?

    This is a fuzzy barely-remembered guess, but: it sets the background color (maybe the border) to black.

    That was the beauty of micros prior to, well, the IBM PC: they were fully knowable by ordinary geeks. You could learn the entire 64KB address space of a C64, the functions of every processor, the workings of every common peripheral.

    These days micros have gotten so complex, with so many variables, that all but the most brilliant have to specialise, and only learn certain parts, relying on others to do the kernel hacking or the printer-driver-writing or the protocol conversions, etc.

    --
    http://alternatives.rzero.com/
  161. More understanding of it? by smoondog · · Score: 2, Funny

    Many hackers, including Woz, have delved into the dark side, if just to gain more understanding of it.

    That is like saying you read playboy just for the articles.

    -Sean

    1. Re:More understanding of it? by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1

      If people are always lying when they say they read Playboy for the articles, then how come Playboy has a braille edition?

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    2. Re:More understanding of it? by multipartmixed · · Score: 1

      > how come Playboy has a braille edition?

      Ribbed for your pleasure?

      --

      Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
  162. Re:Bill Gates, Hall of Fame Hacker? (P.S. First Po by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And Ponce de Leon discovered the Mississippi river. I think we would have stumbled across it eventually.

  163. Re:Bill Gates, Hall of Fame Hacker? (P.S. First Po by Nuclear+Elephant · · Score: 1

    Actually the TRS-80 is what popularized desktop computing. A whopping 128x48 resolution, tape deck support, and that damn orange reset button is where it all started.

    Did Gates really popularize desktop computing, or capitalize on it?

  164. Re:Bill Gates, Hall of Fame Hacker? (P.S. First Po by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

    Microsoft brought desktop computing to the home user.

    And if they hadn't, someone else would have. As many Slashdotters are fond of saying, MS doesn't so much innovate, as embrace and extend good ideas that others came up with.

    Do you think that if computers still consisted on thin-client-server models based on huge VAX mainframes

    I realize from your reference to starting on Windows 3.1 that you're probably younger than most of us, but are you familiar with the Apple II? The Commodore Vic-20? The TRS-80 Color Computer?
    All of these were entirely self-contained microcomputers, and they were part of a home computer market that existed for years before Microsoft had any influence on the market.

    thanks to things like Windows, Office, and MSN, modern computing has been made easy and affordable to everyone

    God bless them! Without Microsoft, we'd all have to use MacOS, WordPerfect, Lotus 1-2-3, and CompuServe instead. And that would be downright nutty.

  165. John Carmack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    An interesting list...

    I think many would wonder about Eric Raymond being included since he's more famous for his writings (and strange personality) than his hacking exploits.

    John Carmack on the other hand is a brilliant programmer who epitomises the ideal of a hacker to me, a brilliant programmer who has really pushed the limits of the technology and doesn't have any chips on his shoulder or any half-baked ideology to push...

    1. Re:John Carmack by adamofgreyskull · · Score: 1

      If anyone should be bumped off the list for JC I reckon it should be this guy, 'Julf'.
      I thought esr wrote some mail program or something? ;o)

  166. Re:Bill Gates, Hall of Fame Hacker? (P.S. First Po by TheCrazyFinn · · Score: 1

    Never seen an early VAX, have you? While not Dinosaur-pen large, the things were pretty massive.

    --
    "You've got an invalid haircut" -Warren Zevon - Life'll Kill Ya
  167. Re:Bill Gates, Hall of Fame Hacker? (P.S. First Po by vjouppi · · Score: 1

    Heh, old CBM 8-bits had a Microsoft derived basic, so you're in the same boat as the PC crowd by that analogy.. :-)

    Commodore did have an interesting license with MS - I don't think MS got one cent of royalties on machines after the PET, even though they did write the original basic interpreter for C= :-)

    --
    -Jope
  168. RFP Labs by TTL0 · · Score: 1

    Rain.Forrest.Puppy was a great source of inspiration for me.
    His hacks on NT ODBC and RDS made him a hero by the script kiddies
    His views on hacking and the current scene are well worth the read.

    --
    Sanity is the trademark of a weak mind. -- Mark Harrold
  169. Re:Bill Gates, Hall of Fame Hacker? (P.S. First Po by LastCa_ · · Score: 2, Interesting

    dunno
    but i do remember poke 65497,0 overclocks my old COCO3 =)

    --
    - LastCall_
  170. Re:Bill Gates, Hall of Fame Hacker? (P.S. First Po by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think you are confusing business acumen with technical knowledge.
    -DOS was a repackaged program
    -Apple had the interface that 'revolutionized' home computing.

    C'mon, you know the roll call of 'inventions' that Microsoft has bought or copied, bullied and conned. Its great economics 101.

    >but thanks to things like
    >Windows, Office, and MSN

    Again, you confuse innovative with well positioned. They did not invent the graphical interface, the word processor and suites, or instant messaging. Life would have been exactly the same in the computing world if Microsoft never released their Office suite.

    The guy who invented the mouse, now that's another story.

    Gates' first 6-8 years of career is a very interesting read.
    Did Gates have good overal vision? Yes.
    Probably better than most.

    Its a success story but one that involves as
    many con jobs as technical exploits.
    You seem to be confusing both.

    zeke

  171. Re:Bill Gates, Hall of Fame Hacker? (P.S. First Po by Endive4Ever · · Score: 1

    It's the cheap and powerful IBM clone.

    There were plenty of 'easier to use' alternatives out there. They were either much more expensive (Macintosh) or limited-use cheap consumer devices.

    It's fine to be nostalgic and enthusiastic about all those cheap 'whole machine in the keyboard' home computers of the olden days, but it's wrong to be biased about their practicality.

    --
    ---
  172. karl koch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Karl Koch(aka hagbard celine) is definately missing in this list, as he is the inventor of the first trojan horse + has a whole movie about him ;-).
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hagbard

  173. Re:Bill Gates, Hall of Fame Hacker? (P.S. First Po by imr · · Score: 1

    You could have spared yourself this and used your mod point, since i never said that he wasnt a programmer or that he was a loosy one.
    I just said that paul allen is more famous as a hacker. Which is basically what you said:
    Paul Allen may be more 'techie'
    Bill was more comfortable doing the business stuff
    he was never part of the hacker culture
    his early concern for copyrights when others were sharing everything
    Yes, I, like you, put also sharing as a requisite in the hacker mindset.

  174. Re:Stealing the Mona Lisa... by Endive4Ever · · Score: 1

    Well, maybe the broken-down Apple after they were not able to maintain a monopoly on the GUI (which they tried to do: research the look-n-feel lawsuit). The rich arrogant Apple of the past has somewhat been humbled.

    --
    ---
  175. Deja vu again by craw · · Score: 1

    There are two people who should be included on this list, which we discussed several years ago.

    Seymour Cray and Grace Hopper.

    When asked what CAD tools he used to design his supercomputers, Cray replied, "Number three pencils and quadrille pads."

    Grace Hopper used to pass out short pieces of wire to illustrate what was a nanosecond. The length of the wire was how far light would travel in a nanosecond.

  176. not bad by bp33 · · Score: 1

    Omitting Bill Joy over some of these characters was a mistake (Eric Raymond? Riighht) but overall it was a good list.

  177. Re:Bill Gates, Hall of Fame Hacker? (P.S. First Po by diersing · · Score: 1
    As far as the GUI, I'm referring to Lisa, not necessarily the concept of a GUI.

    The mouse is more then hardware to the home user, its the primary interactive device with their PC (there aren't tons of dumb users being click happy for nothing).

    I encourage you to research on your own or watch Pirates of Silicon Valley.

  178. Re:Bill Gates, Hall of Fame Hacker? (P.S. First Po by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Geez, thanks for making me notice the grey hairs starting to spring up on my noggin. What's scary is not that I understood your reference, but that I actually remembered what it did after literally 20 years of not interacting with the C=64's memory map.

    I also remember writing self-modifying code in BASIC by clearing the screen, PRINTing the desired line of new code, writing the keycodes for "up-arrow up-arrow return" into the 64's 10-character keyboard input buffer, and stopping execution. The keyboard reader would interpret those as having been typed manually and would move the cursor to the line in question and send a return, and the BASIC interpreter would insert that line into the already-loaded program. Follow the line of code with "RUN $LINENUM" and voila!, your program would have successfully altered itself and resumed execution.

    Finally, I'll never forget the day my parents broke down and bought me the "C=64 Macro Assembler" and "Programmer's Reference Manual". I didn't know at the time that Assembler was supposed to be difficult to learn - I thought it was a super-simplified BASIC and treated it accordingly: "Hmmm, I need to set a variable. What command sets a memory location to a value? (Scanning the opcode list in the PRM...) Oh, this'll work! (Typing: LDA, 42; STA $C001)."

    Heck, I learned binary math by working through the examples to calculate sprite bitmaps. Man, I loved that little machine.

    --
    Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  179. Where are the hacks? by CrazyWingman · · Score: 1

    ...not to be confused with the MIT IHTFP Hack Gallery, the REAL hack ;)

  180. Language and its adoption by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 1

    I took a Japanese course many years ago, night class several times a week. One of the stories I wrote for this class included mention of the northern CA town of Chico. I wrote it in Japanese as chi-ko, she said no, write a long o, chi-ko-u, because it is no longer a Spanish word, it is now an American name of an American town, and pronounced with a long o. The more I thought about it, the more I reckoned she was right. Words change when they are adopted from one language into another.

    Japanese did an interesting job on the name of the country Mexico. The Mexican pronunciation of Mexico is May-hee-ko, which works beautifully just like that in Japanese. But they got the name of the country from Americans, so (at least 30 years ago), the Japanese word for that country is pronounced as May-kee-hee-ko.

    I like an old joke, when someone gives you grief about pronouncing a city or country name wrongly ... what is the capital of France? Nope, not pair-us, it's pah-ree. What's the capital of Germany? Wrong, Berlin is the capital of Deutschland.

    Language is what it is. People can quibble all day about whether words have been hijacked by idiots, but language is what it is, and if 99% of the population understands hacker to be evil, then the 1% had better be aware of it.

  181. Didn't even make the top 15? What gives? by Wargames · · Score: 1

    That's a respectable list of dudez but few compare to Wargames.

    --
    -- Each tock of the Planck clock is a new world and here we are still life. --
  182. Re:Stealing the Mona Lisa... by tverbeek · · Score: 1
    I do remember my first PC. It was ~2MHz I think, a single 5.25" floppy, single density 360KiB formatted disks. MSDOS v5 or so, and 128KiB of RAM. Monochrome CGA display. Something along those lines, anyway, don't have exact spec. and I may be wrong about MSDOS version.

    You're doing the equivalent of describing a meeting between Elizabeth I, Ben Franklin, George Washington, and Abe Lincoln. You'd have to ratchet the speed up and downgrade that OS dramatically to have components that ever actually coexisted in a single working system. The earliest IBM-type PC ran at a snappy 4.77MHz, and MS-DOS 5.0 (which didn't come along until about 10 years later) wouldn't have run (let alone have room for any apps) in only 128KB of RAM.

    --
    http://alternatives.rzero.com/
  183. Then you lose by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 1

    Languages ARE defined by usage. Dictionaries follow usage, they do not govern it. People don't learn to read dictionaries before they learn to read and speak.

    Languages evolve. Words you use today had different meanings 50 years ago. Computer, for instance, meant people who do computations, by hand or with calculators. No doubt they were just as miffed at the new fangled meaning as you are by the new fangled meaning of hacker. Too bad!

    Look up interesting phrases sometime, you would be amazed at how meanings have changed to the opposite of what they used to mean. Look up history of various words. The only languages which can be defined by a dictionary are dead languages like Latin and ancient Greek.

  184. Re:Bill Gates, Hall of Fame Hacker? (P.S. First Po by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What about those of us who grew up in the '90s ?

  185. 2001? Isn't it 2600? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Current status: Kevin Mitnick played himself in 2001's hacker documentary Freedom Downtime. He also appeared on ABC's Alias as a CIA computer whiz; to play the role, Mitnick was only allowed to use prop computers."

  186. All guys... by FirstTimeCaller · · Score: 1

    How disappointing. Where's all the HOT hacker chicks?

    --
    Wanted: witty unique signature. Must be willing to relocate.
  187. Ian Murphy? Horseshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Read his "dossier" written by people who know him best, complete with much official documentation.
    http://www.attrition.org/errata/ch arlatan/murphy/

    In the 70's the Ian Murphy was active in, and repeatedly arrested for: shoplifting, vandalism, and petty theft (mostly at Radio Shack), however; his parents position in the community allowed them to protect him from prosecution. In 1981 he was found guilty of felony fraud and theft. Simply put, he was having high school students steal computer equipment for him. He would them remove the serial numbers and "fence" or sell the stolen equipment. He was eventually caught, convicted, and spent considerable time in prison and/or on probation. Ian claims to have "been the first convicted hacker", and the "first hacker ever convicted of a crime" (which is of course blatantly false). His felony convictions had nothing to do with hacking, but instead felony theft and felony fraud. He has repeatedly tried to capitalize on his felony (and other) convictions. Since most people neglect to verify his claims they take him at face value and falsely believe him to be some kind of hacker or security expert.

    Ian A. Murphy is nothing more than a middle aged convicted felon, con artist and petty thief with a long history of running scams. He has virtually no technical skills (which should be obvious), no formal education, no computer training, and no security training. He knows just enough computer lingo and jargon to baffle his audience (provided they lack a technical background). He claims to have been employed by the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) as a member of a covert assassination team, and also claims to have been a Navy SEAL. Subject claims to have been taught information warfare by the National Security Agency (NSA). His tradecraft is very poor, and the official records indicate that his claims are totally false. Official government documents indicate that he was never an employee, nor a contractor. It should be mentioned that the subject has been committed to psychiatric facilities several times for "being delusional".

    Official Navy documents indicate that the subject enlisted for duty on 6/27/74 in Philadelphia, PA. However, he never made it through boot camp at Great Lakes Naval Training Center. Ian was thrown out after several weeks, and listed as "unsuitable for military service". Officially since he never graduated from Boot Camp the Navy never offered him any type of job. He was given an General Discharge (which is bad news), and was never given any awards or decorations. The Navy confiscated all uniforms, clothes, and equipment from him and literally tossed him out with only the clothes on his back, and a one way bus ticket home. Navy records indicated the he was a high school drop out with no technical training. Despite what Ian has repeatedly claimed, he was never a Navy SEAL, never a Green Beret, Ranger, Spec Ops, etc.

    Much, much more to read there.

  188. Re:Bill Gates, Hall of Fame Hacker? (P.S. First Po by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Likewise it's completely moronic to claim that Gates just sat back and let IBM do all the work for them. (Especially because it ignores that MS completely outwitted IBM during the whole OS/2-Windows thing.)

    Microsoft's stated goal was "A computer in every home, on every desk" -- that certainly was not IBM's attitude.

  189. My list: by drwhite · · Score: 1

    Me, Myself and I!

    Those are the greatest hackers!

  190. Dave Small would be my addition to the list by Tran · · Score: 1

    iirc his name correctly. He's the one that built ( and sold!) the Mac emulator for the Atari ST. Same processor ( Motorola 68000 ) ( and you had to get your own Apple ROMs) - but made the emulator run faster than the native MAC. His articles in an Atari magazine showed me that one could be technically adept as well as socially. I always wondered what happened to him..

  191. Re:Bill Gates, Hall of Fame Hacker? (P.S. First Po by blugu64 · · Score: 1

    Actually my first experience that I can remember is a Macintosh Plus around 86-87. It's rumored that we had an old Zeneth DOS machine back in the day, but I can't remember it. Anyway after that Mac Plus nothing else would do anyway....

    --
    "Personal ownership is a hallmark of conservative capitalism. And I don't believe I am entitled to anything that I did n
  192. Re:Bill Gates, Hall of Fame Hacker? (P.S. First Po by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someone once told me they stole it from Dartmouth Basic

  193. Another case by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 1
    How many heteros these days, when happy, describe their mood as "gay". ;-)

    There's the occasional old fart who still uses it in its previous form, but that's another word that's been pretty much changed to mean something else, and far more so that "hacker". I'm not saying it's a good or bad thing. It just is.

    --
    --- Ban humanity.
  194. Re:Stealing the Mona Lisa... by NutscrapeSucks · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The key difference between Microsoft and IBM/Apple/Digital Research/Lotus/Everyone Else is that Microsoft priced stuff cheap and marketed their products for maximum adoption. Everyone else was trying to fatten their bottom line.

    You could argue that others were willing to bring the PC Revolution to the masses, but Microsoft was certainly the most agressive and successful at doing so.

    It's just like Henry Ford -- he wasn't the first to use assembly line and mass marketing techniques, but he was most successful at doing so, and thus his name is in the history books.

    --
    Whenever I hear the word 'Innovation', I reach for my pistol.
  195. Re:Bill Gates, Hall of Fame Hacker? (P.S. First Po by blugu64 · · Score: 1

    ...cause we all know Pirates of Silicon valley is totally accurate ;) I mean comon they had a freaken Apple IIc in a scene that was suppposed to be several years before it came out! (for those intrested it's in the background in one of those scenes at apple during Mac development) Also I coulda sworn that I saw a green c:\ reflection on bill gates glasses during the scene when he is "programming" dos....double plus nerd huh?

    --
    "Personal ownership is a hallmark of conservative capitalism. And I don't believe I am entitled to anything that I did n
  196. Re:Bill Gates, Hall of Fame Hacker? (P.S. First Po by Slime-dogg · · Score: 1

    My first experience with an OS was on my father's home-brewed OS called 'NetDOS,' or whatever it was supposed to be named. He wrote it in the early 80's, and it had network functionality (with my dad's own protocols.) Some guy was supposed to sell it, but he never followed through. My dad could have been... oh well, nevermind.

    I'm a second-generation computer nerd, but my nerd-dom goes all the way back to Newton. :-P

    --
    You need to restart your computer. Hold down the Power button for several seconds or press the Restart button.
  197. Re:Bill Gates, Hall of Fame Hacker? (P.S. First Po by Armchair+Dissident · · Score: 1

    Bill Gates would still be stuck flogging DOS licenses to IBM customers if it hadn't been for Compaq. Remember that MS-DOS only ran on IBM machines, and it was only when Compaq successfully cloned the IBM-PC with a masterful stroke of reverse engineering that the IBM-PC Compatible became cheap enough to achieve the market dominance it enjoys today.

    Gates got lucky because of Compaq. He himself did nothing to bring easy to use cheap PC's to the desktop.

    --

    The ways of gods are mysteriously indistinguishable from chance.
  198. Re:Bill Gates, Hall of Fame Hacker? (P.S. First Po by civilizedINTENSITY · · Score: 1

    I thought microsoft brought desktop computing to the home user... Then microsoft copied it poorly. I do remember Win3.1, and 2.0, and 1.0. It was quite awhile before MS ever got "desktop" close to right. MacHeads had it for awhile, first.

  199. Re:Bill Gates, Hall of Fame Hacker? (P.S. First Po by civilizedINTENSITY · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Couldn't you perhaps say that BG hacked the business system?

  200. Shimomura security expert eh? by skinfitz · · Score: 1

    After colleagues at the San Diego Supercomputing Center informed Shimomura that someone had stolen hundreds of software programs and files from his work station,

    Yeah - he sounds like a REAL expert - having to be told that his workstation had been compromised...? Not to mention left vulnerable in the first place.

  201. First computer experience? by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    Some Radio Shack branded machine at my uncle's place, it had BASCI in which I programmed a few games.

    The in the Uni we had a Burroughs multiuser system.

    Around this time I worked equally in the Burroughs and the first PCs in Mexico City.

    My first job was in a UNISYS A-12.

    My second job was with Sun (SunOS 3.x, funnily enough our secretaries used Macs).

    So there, you are pressuming too much.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  202. Holy Kibo! Kibo isn't on that list! by kakos · · Score: 1

    What about Kibo? Probably the most cultish figure on the internet, a hacker with quite a bit of legend wrapped around him, and yet he isn't on the list. They forsake Kibo and Kibology!

  203. Another pet peeve. by spamania · · Score: 2, Insightful

    In the bio for Vladimir Levin:

    "...a security system so tight that no other financial institution in the world has it."

    As I'm sure Bruce Schneir would fall all over himself to point out, this association actually decreases the likelyhood that the system is actually secure.

    --
    My other .sig is a troll.
  204. Missing: Wietse Venema by genericacct · · Score: 1

    I "met" Mr. Venema at a trade show. He is definitely on par with these guys: wrote TCP Wrappers and Postfix, and knows more about security than anyone I can think of. He's also just as charismatic as Linus, as far as I can tell.

  205. phiber optik by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ah, reading this list brings back memories. It's disheartening to see Phiber Optik on this list but no one from LoD. Phiber was a major ahole, along with most of MoD. It's also interested that he was part of a failed security company while everyone else went off to bigger and better things. Ah, sweet justice.

  206. You are getting confussed trolly boy. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    Hacker is a nominative use to recognize the technical skills of a computer enthusiast.

    Was Bill Gates a hacker? Yes, surely, he obviously could program his way out of trouble.

    Now, were his technical skills up to scratch? That is more debatable.

    Bill Gates certainly changed the computer world, if the changes have been goo it is left to personal interpretation, but Bill Gates will be remembered as a ruthless businessman (and here give ruthless whatever slant you want, I mean it negatively), not a technical person (how could he, he almost missed the Internet and his companies most successful products have been based on ideas developped elsewhere).

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  207. Re:Bill Gates, Hall of Fame Hacker? (P.S. First Po by gnu-generation-one · · Score: 1
  208. Re:Bill Gates, Hall of Fame Hacker? (P.S. First Po by Cynikal · · Score: 2, Interesting

    but see.. how many of those hall of famers stated on a trs-80 or other system running the basic written by gates and allen? and we're not talking basic as a programming language so much as basic as an OS, you turned em on, and boom you were in basic, using basic commands to access your entire system.

    i dont know about his being hailed as a hacker of fame (dont get me started on a few others on that list too) but he definately had a huge impact the computer community AND the hacker community.

    (im not worried, flames keep me warm in the winter)

  209. More Names Of Famous Hax0rz who Could Be In The li by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oracle CEO.
    The guy who "invented" ctrl-alt-del.
    Professor Shamir, for his general contribution to mankind.
    RMS, for starting Hurd.
    Trinity (for another post)
    Oliver's twist person.
    Doctor Who.
    The guy who invented Microsoft Excel.
    MacOS-X developers.
    Al Gore.
    Michael Jordan.
    Bijin Ahandi (famous egyptian programmer)
    John Lakos (invented #ifdef inclusion safety guard for C and C++)
    Natalie Portmann.
    Adolf Hitler (he would be a BAD hax0r if alive)
    Bob.

  210. Re:Bill Gates, Hall of Fame Hacker? (P.S. First Po by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MS-DOS? Windows 3.1? My first computer experience was OS/8 on a PDP-8 microcomputer.

    MS-DOG on a IBM 5150 couldn't hold the bits of CP/M running on any of IBM's competitors in 1980. It's amazing that the weaker OS on substandard hardware on a processor with a totally fucked ISA became the standard computer architecture of today.

  211. Re:Stealing the Mona Lisa... by MrBlint · · Score: 0

    Abort, Retry or Fail? I never did work out the difference between Abort and Fail.

    --
    That's very perceptive of you Mr Stapleton and rather unexpected in a G Major
  212. Re:Holy Kibo! Kibo isn't on that list! by swordgeek · · Score: 1

    Damn skippy! And unlike some on the list (ESR comes to mind), Kibo at least DID something. Hell, he rewrote network history.

    --

    "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
  213. Re:Bill Gates, Hall of Fame Hacker? (P.S. First Po by swordgeek · · Score: 1

    OK, I'll disagree.

    First of all, Bill Gates got started as a programmer. From most accounts, probably a fairly good programmer.

    Then he went to the business world, and became really good at that. Frighteningly good.

    BUT, there's nothing either hack-ish or particularly innovative for that matter, in his behaviour. Actually, there was one thing he did: Copyright, patent, and charge through the nose for the basic software needed for a machine to work.

    Desktop computing was well on its way before he started to make things user friendly. Atari and Commodore had their 16-bit machines out with plug-and-play hardware, a mouse, and a GUI, when Microsoft was still pushing DOS. Of course, the Mac predated them both, and was VERY popular.

    Bill Gates happened to be the right guy at the right time in the right place to capitalise on this stuff. Without him, the market would be different but no less advanced than it is now.

    --

    "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
  214. Two nominees: John Walker and Steve Gibson by 14erCleaner · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Most of the people in their "hall of fame" are fine candidates (except maybe for the Russian con-man guy), but I'd like to nominate two more supreme code-creator types who don't get all the media attention:

    John Walker, founder of Autodesk, creates and gives away a lot of great stuff, including astronomy, math, and science programs. His web site is great: fourmilab.net

    Steve Gibson, author of the SpinRite utilities that date back to MS-DOS days at least, is also a prolific creator of lean, mean, free stuff. His web site, grc.com, has a catalog of cool little Windows utilities for changing settings, detecting spyware, closing security holes, etc., for Windows. In true hacker style, he prefers to do his coding in assembly language, and his stuff is consistently high-quality and useful. For example, try out wizmo, a little program that can be used to trigger the screen saver and to change other settings, plus has a built-in graphical gravitational simulator, and all in about 37K of code!

    --
    Have you read my blog lately?
  215. Re:Bill Gates, Hall of Fame Hacker? (P.S. First Po by MrBlint · · Score: 0
    he traded in his keyboard long ago for an empty suit and a few billion.

    I call that a pretty good trade. Where exactly can I find a deal like that - I've got a couple of old keyboards up in the loft.

    --
    That's very perceptive of you Mr Stapleton and rather unexpected in a G Major
  216. Re:news? this is over three years old. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    check the wayback machine:

    http://web.archive.org/web/20010721134101/http:/ /t lc.discovery.com/convergence/hackers/bio/bio.html

    July 2001. I've seen this page in about every other google search i've ever done on one of these guys.


    Yeah, I remember checking out this Hacker List like 2 years ago, after watching some special they had on TLC. I'm glad I don't pay for access to these "new" articles.

  217. Re:Bill Gates, Hall of Fame Hacker? (P.S. First Po by multipartmixed · · Score: 1
    I do remember Win3.1, and 2.0, and 1.0


    Liar.

    --

    Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
  218. Re:Bill Gates, Hall of Fame Hacker? (P.S. First Po by EverDense · · Score: 1

    And for those of you that think the fact that Gates is a business man now, and that MSN should disqualify him, I have only this to say: Should we now start removing people from places like the baseball hall of fame after they retire?

    Should we start ADDING people to the baseball hall of fame that play tennis?

    Perhaps you could buy yourself a valid argument with some logic.

    --
    http://jesus.everdense.com/
  219. Re:Bill Gates, Hall of Fame Hacker? (P.S. First Po by the_mad_poster · · Score: 1

    Well, I agree that some of the folks on that list leave a lot to be desired. I don't know about the anonymous remailer "hacker" for one or the EFF founder for another. However, people like ESR and RMS - while, perhaps, out of place around the likes of Condor, Cap'n Crunch, and Phiber Optik - definitely exemplify the "good guy" hacker persona as much as the others exemplify the "dark side" of the art.

    I don't think I'm convinced ol' Billy Boy belongs on there though. Of course, look at it this way. Without guys like Woz they might not have had trash 80s with BASIC anyway, so maybe if Woz belongs, Bill does too.... I dunno... I still think Bill has been and always will be a marketeer at heart. Maybe he should go on for Soc Eng skills?

    --
    Alito: A vote for Alito is a punch in the eye to put that bitch back in her place!
  220. Re:Stealing the Mona Lisa... by MrBlint · · Score: 0

    Interestingly, GEM is now freely available as OpenGEM available under the GPL license.

    --
    That's very perceptive of you Mr Stapleton and rather unexpected in a G Major
  221. Re:Bill Gates, Hall of Fame Hacker? (P.S. First Po by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    They didn't have actual Altair, because no one had it those days - the cover photo was a mock, MITS was just testing the water with a vaporware announcement

    So, the Homebrew Computing Club were just using slide rules, then? Or are you saying that the HCC was a myth, fabricated by the Military Industrial Complex?

  222. Re:Bill Gates, Hall of Fame Hacker? (P.S. First Po by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    [original AC posting...]

    Yes, CrazyFinn, I have seen many early VAX machines!

    They were usually tucked in around the odd corners of the machine room, next the the air-con and power conditioning gear while the IBM processer and DASD boxes took up most of the floorspace.

  223. Hackers definition by rchoetzlein · · Score: 1

    There are as many definitions of the word Hacker as there are geeks who post to slashdot (and more).

    The definitions all overlap --- slightly.

  224. Re:Bill Gates, Hall of Fame Hacker? (P.S. First Po by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Woz will be the first to tell you that Wozniak/Jobs wasn't the "Wozniak/Jobs relationship" that a lot of people think it was, either.

  225. Re:Bill Gates, Hall of Fame Hacker? (P.S. First Po by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get Fscked you MS Karma wh0re!

  226. Unusual tools?!? by e4e6 · · Score: 1
    Along with a computer, computer games and disks, Russian police confiscated a camcorder, music speakers and a TV set from Levin's apartment.
    The only thing I find unusuall is the they didn't find a stereo to boot. What was his devious intent with those speakers?
  227. Re:Bill Gates, Hall of Fame Hacker? (P.S. First Po by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Outnumbered, but not outclassed. If you never made a telnet connection via the receiver of a rotary-dial phone, never ran an aplication directly off a magnetic tape (or punch card!), never heard of Sperry or VAX, never set through a Pascal or FORTRAN class taught by a High School Math teacher who knew less about the school's computers than you did, and don't recall those horrible IBM commercials with the Charlie Chaplin look-alike pimping "business" software, then 70s and 80s hackers will probably forever view you as a "New Kid."

  228. Origin does not matter by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 1
    Hacker may not have meant bad guy when coined, but that is actually irrelevant.

    Like I said in another post, the word "quiz" was originally used to describe an odd or unusual person. Then it began to be used for unusual toys, and only after a long while did it get applied to a form of test.

    Things just happen faster today, so a word goes from being coined to bastardized in, like, days.

    --
    --- Ban humanity.
  229. Re:Bill Gates, Hall of Fame Hacker? (P.S. First Po by sjames · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Actually, Bill G. really did just manage to be in the right place at the right time to get himself inserted into the loop. The PC revolution would have done just fine (probably better) without him.

    First of all, had there been no Microsoft, IBM would have just licenced CP/M instead. The first several versions of DOS bore a REMARKABLE resemblance to CP/M anyway, right down to loading com programs at offset 0x100.

    At the point where windows was still a crash ridden bugfest (even moreso than after 3.1) that was shipped as a runtime with individual applications (since nobody in their right mind would have run it as a standalone), there were a few Unix choices for the PC.

    CP/M or Unix, either way, the thin client connected to a vax would have been replaced by the PC. Most likely, IBM would have done OS/2 anyway, after all, it WAS a better Windows than Windows (but not as well marketed).

    The Word Processor of the day was Word Perfect. Had Office never come into existance, I suppose it still would be. Unlike Office, it was fairly easy to get complete documentation of the EP file formats and an SDK to go with it.

    The internet happpened IN SPITE of Microsoft, not because of it. People were usiong Trumpet winsock on win3.1 for dialup internet while Bill G. claimed it was a passing fad.

    The browser of choice was Netscape.

    Linux would most probably still have wanted Unix for his '386, so he still would have done what he did. RMS would still have written GNU.

    As a hacker, Bill G. was the anti-hacker. While the hackers traded code for the love of coding, Bill G. started charging for binaries and witholding the source.

    His first proprietary app was a BASIC interpreter for the Altair. It was prepaid by a number of people. It was over a year late and still shot through with bugs. Someone managed to get hold of one of his paper tapes and copy it. The tape was distributed amongst hobbiests, most of whom HAD paid for it, but didn't actually get a copy in any form (much less working) until the tape was copied. It wasn't 'piracy', it was a consumer action that probably hurt him a lot less than being taken to court over and over again.

    Gates and MS certainly did have an effect on modern computing. I believe that the effect was to set it back 5-10 years while making a pile of money. He was NOT a hacker.

  230. Hacker Crackdown by xot · · Score: 2, Informative

    Theres a good book out there for all of you interested in the early hacker/cracker movement written by Bruce Sterling.Its called the Hacker Crackdown and is available here in the electronic format.
    Very well researched and written.Gives you a good insight intothe days of LoD,MoD and others.A lot of the guys on this list feature in the book.

    --
    Lord of the Binges.
    1. Re:Hacker Crackdown by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh, great book. Bruce did most of the research for that book sitting in a hallway at the Airport Ramada Inn ( just outside of Intergalactic Airport in Houston...now the George Bush International Airport) drinking Heineken out of my cooler.

  231. Re:Bill Gates, Hall of Fame Hacker? (P.S. First Po by SphericalCrusher · · Score: 0

    Bill Gates is a great business man, I give that to him.. but one of the greatest hackers of all time? Nope. I respect Microsoft for everything they have done... or stolen and made better... or bought... but No. I don't agree that he's a hacker.

    --
    "Instant gratification takes too long." - Carrie Fisher
  232. UNIX: The language by shish · · Score: 1

    "UNIX helped users with general computing, word processing and networking, and soon became a standard language."

    Also note: Unix should be lowercase - it's not an acronym, it's just that at the same time it was created, so too was the print formatter's (troff?) smallcaps function. They got all excited and started using smallcaps for the word "unix" wherever it was found.

    --
    I mod down anyone who says "I will be modded down for this", regardless of the rest of their comment
    1. Re:UNIX: The language by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I beg to differ.

      "The UNIX Operating System started as a result of the MULTICS porject. MULTICS was a joint venture between General Electric, AT&T Bell Labs, and MIT to create an operating system on the GE 645 computer. MULTICS stood for "MULTiplexed Information and Computing System." It contributed greatly to research and understanding of the operating system concept of capabilities, but in practice it was slow and very expensive to use.
      Some of the people from the MULTICS project at Bell Labs created UNIX. Ken Thompson, in his desire to test a new file-system design, implemented his design on a little used DEC PDP-7. An operating system and command interpreter (shell) was created for this file-system. Dennis Ritchie and Rudd Canady helped create this system named UNICS for "UNiplexed Information and Computing System." This name was later changed to UNIX. The PDP-7 version of UNIX was later enhanced to allow two users at the same time."

      Berkeley UNIX-A Simple and Comprehensive Guide
      Robert Wilson 1991

    2. Re:UNIX: The language by shish · · Score: 1

      My reference, the jargon file:
      Some people are confused over whether this word is appropriately 'UNIX' or 'Unix'; both forms are common, and used interchangeably. Dennis Ritchie says that the 'UNIX' spelling originally happened in CACM's 1974 paper The UNIX Time-Sharing System because "we had a new typesetter and troff had just been invented and we were intoxicated by being able to produce small caps." Later, dmr tried to get the spelling changed to 'Unix' in a couple of Bell Labs papers, on the grounds that the word is not acronymic. He failed, and eventually (his words) "wimped out" on the issue. So, while the trademark today is 'UNIX', both capitalizations are grounded in ancient usage; the Jargon File uses 'Unix' in deference to dmr's wishes.

      --
      I mod down anyone who says "I will be modded down for this", regardless of the rest of their comment
  233. Re:Bill Gates, Hall of Fame Hacker? (P.S. First Po by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 1


    Bill founded what is now the largest software company in the world, and wether or not you agree with him, he has made a important contribution to the computing industry: Microsoft brought desktop computing to the home user.

    Now, be honest. How many of us had our first computer experience with MS-DOS or Windows 3.1? Do you think that if computers still consisted on thin-client-server models based on huge VAX mainframes, that Joe and Jane Smith would be able to dial-in to AOL and connect to thousands of people around the world?


    You're wrong. Bill Gates did not bring us desktop computing. Now, he did do something else. He was a major part of computing turning to commodity hardware. And that was no small step in computing history. Bill deserves some credit there. But not for the laundry list you've provided.

    Others have already pointed out that Apple should get credit where you've been attributing it to Microsoft (although no mention of the Apple Lisa). However, they miss a couple important points (that happen before the Mac).

    The Apple II had a major impact to microcomputing. First, it was the first real consumer "home computer". It was the first system that came complete with a keyboard in a custom, stylish plastic case. Secondly, it ran the first business killer app - VisiCalc. The advent of the spreadsheet made microcomputers a must-have for business and extended them beyond the realms of hobbiests and scientists. And it generated a market that had taken IBM by such suprise that they had to rush to market with a "personal computer" using off-the-shelf components (and thus providing another key piece to the formation of a commodity hardware market). Also keep in mind that the expanding business market also expanded the home computer market as consumers mirrored their work environment at home.


    Would the Internet have blossomed into the vast information network it is today without the aid of easy-to-use software from Microsoft?


    Microsoft missed the Internet boat. Consumer Internet access was gaining popularity well before Microsoft did their historical turn-on-a-dime. It was smart of Microsoft to make that change and make their systems easier to use with Internet technology. But it was something that would have happened with or without them. Not because of them.


    How about Grandma who wants to set up a webcam so she can chat with her grandchildren? She doesn't want to have to sit and hack kernels for hours. She wants Plug-and-Play, baby.


    Grandma should have a Mac. Back when Microsoft's supported efforts were called "plug-and-pray", Apple's offering Just Worked.

    Don't get me wrong. Its a good goal. And Microsoft has improved vastly since those early days. Heck - even various Linux distros put forth a rather good effort.

    But if "ease of use" was such an important factor, Microsoft would not be so dominant today.


    Look, disagree all you like, but thanks to things like Windows, Office, and MSN, modern computing has been made easy and affordable to everyone, thanks to pioneers like Bill Gates.


    I can understand being ignorant of history - especially if you start your own memory of computing at DOS and Win3.1x. But you'll need to get a better historical perspective if you want your commentary on "pioneers" to have any weight.

    One interesting side note - MSN was a major issue when it surfaced. It was going to take on AOL. And AOL's grumblings over MSN sounded much like the whole IE issue. But then, something happened. The Internet. It transformed both AOL (who first offered Internet access as a feature, then became an ISP). And it completely changed what MSN was to be even before it was. All of this was a reaction to events rather than being a pioneer.
  234. Re:Bill Gates, Hall of Fame Hacker? (P.S. First Po by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    who?

  235. Re:Stealing the Mona Lisa... by Reziac · · Score: 1

    BTW has anyone done any serious work on the GEM source that was released a while back? That is, has anything modern-world useful come of it?

    I first met GEM under Ventura Publisher. I've got the entire commercial GEM package in a box around here somewhere (courtesy of DAK's going-out-of-business sale).

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  236. Re:Bill Gates, Hall of Fame Hacker? (P.S. First Po by PacoTaco · · Score: 1

    I found a copy of Windows 1.0 on a BBS years ago. (I have no idea if it was authentic.) It looked a lot like dosshell, as I recall.

  237. Re:Bill Gates, Hall of Fame Hacker? (P.S. First Po by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bullshit! Bill Gates is a robber baron. He has done exactly 0 to advance computing. He has done a lot to line his pocket book, but nothing else. The internet came before Billy, was thriving before Billy, occastionally gets pulled down because of Billy's crap software, but that's it. He didn't even want the internet standard -TCP/IP- he wanted his own winsock protocol for a while. The GUI came before Billy (thanks Xerox PARC/Alan Kay, Doug Englebart, et al). The modern GUI first appeared on Xerox machines, then apples, then amigas and much later PC's (several years later). Bill's company did for a while put 'reboot' buttons on the front of PC's (gee, thanks Bill). Bill Gates can be listed along beside P.T. Barnum and W. Raldolph Hurst, and OPEC circa 1973. Bill's technical skills are on par with those of your typical end-user who has successfully read 'computers for dummies'. He is good at getting people to buy though. (See above reference to P.T. Barnum, etc.) Otherwise, he's an idiot with a bowl cut. Pioneer? NO. Johnny-come-lately? Oh Yeah.

  238. Semantics by bonch · · Score: 0, Redundant

    It's just nerd semantics. Only on Slashdot is there suddenly some sort of big issue between the usage of "hacker" and "cracker." The entire rest of the world uses "hacker."

    It's like a recent post I wrote (check my history). It was a tongue-in-cheek list of the reasons nerds don't get laid--it was originally +5, then suddenly plummeted to 1 when someone pointed out I confused "geek" and "nerd."

    It was insane--one of the points I had written was that geeks get overly concerned about pointless definitions and facts that nobody else even acknowledges. And here was someone who completely missed that and actually replied to criticize a joke post, thereby proving it true.

    It's stupid to expect everyone to accept our little definition of "hacker" and "cracker" and get all bent out of shape when 90% of the world continues to use the definition they all already agreed on. Actually, it's a bit self-absorbed.

  239. Re:Stealing the Mona Lisa... by sjames · · Score: 1

    If Rosa Parks wasn't going to stand her ground on the bus

    If Rosa Parks was a hacker, Bill Gates was the gladhanding polititian who didn't really like black people but figured he could get elected if he co-opted the image of Rosa Parks.

  240. Sorry, he still didn't claim to invent it by bonch · · Score: 1, Insightful

    He took credit for "taking the initiative in inventing the Internet."

    Guess what, he did. He helped sign in the legislative funding for the project. He was referring to himself as having invented it--merely signing the initial legislation that created it.

    He claimed he was tired when he said it. I can understand. After having done a ton of interviews and things, and talking about technology to one particular interviewer and thinking back on signing into law the legislation, I'd probably also say, "yeah, I helped take the initiative in creating the Internet" without realizing how out-of-context it would suddenly be taken.

  241. Re:Bill Gates, Hall of Fame Hacker? (P.S. First Po by jonnystiph · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It freezes over the depths of hell, but it warms my heart that /.ers can finally accept that although his parctices are sometimes out of place, Bill Gates has contributed alot to modern personal computing.

    --

    If we don't make light of everything, we are just stumbling in the dark - Blank

  242. Re:Bill Gates, Hall of Fame Hacker? (P.S. First Po by Zeinfeld · · Score: 0
    As far as the GUI, I'm referring to Lisa, not necessarily the concept of a GUI.

    The Lisa interface was stolen from the Xerox Altair. Bill stole from the same source. But he did give the guy who designed a lot of the GUI a bag of gold for his trouble.

    Apple then went out and tried to sue competitors into the ground. The GEM interface on the Atari was miles better than the crappy Mac effort of the day. Apple bullied the GEM O/S out of the market. Microsoft had the guts to stand up to the bullies at apple.

    --
    Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
    Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
  243. Re:Bill Gates, Hall of Fame Hacker? (P.S. First Po by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Would the Internet have blossomed into the vast information network it is today without the aid of easy-to-use software from Microsoft?"

    Arrrgh. For those of us who remember 1995, the answer is yes, despite MS. Back in 1994, when I was running Chicago (Win95 beta's), MS were pushing MSN which was a proprietry alternative to the internet. You had to buy 'Blackbird' SDK's to create content.
    And yes, MSN was basically a big pile of boxes in Redmond that was fully centralised (like CompuServe at the time). MS didn't even have a webbrowser when I started using WWW with Netscape Navigator 1.0.

    It was only when MS woke up and figured out that TCP/IP and the WWW was bigger than them, that that went out and brought IE and supported the internet. MS Mail lingered on for a while before it to died and was replaced with SMTP/POP.

    Of course those companies who had already created content for the MSN network got burned. MS re-used the MSN name as cover for the cock-up and turned it into a ISP/web site/AOL competitor.

  244. Re:Bill Gates, Hall of Fame Hacker? (P.S. First Po by actaeon169 · · Score: 1

    I didn't know at the time that Assembler was supposed to be difficult to learn - I thought it was a super-simplified BASIC and treated it accordingly: "Hmmm, I need to set a variable. What command sets a memory location to a value? (Scanning the opcode list in the PRM...) Oh, this'll work! (Typing: LDA, 42; STA $C001)."

    Ah... C001. Right at the beginning of the tape buffer. I'm currently taking a required class in 80x86 Assembley, and I'll be damned if I don't keep thinking, "Where are JSR and LDA in here?"

  245. Re:Bill Gates, Hall of Fame Hacker? (P.S. First Po by Shanep · · Score: 1

    Yeah, yeah, I know, I'll be lynched for saying that Bill "I am Satan" Gates should be on par with RMS, ESR and Linus, but think about this for a second.

    He made market changing contributions, but I would not put him up with Ken and Dennis. How long did it take Microsoft to deliver a relatively stable OS with memory protection in the kernel (NT)? They had to base it on another OS which was not written by themselves. Is that innovation? They finally glued the upside down MacOS-like GUI on top of it, is that innovation? Was it innovation when they threatened OEM's that they would be left out in the cold if they did not forcibly bundle MS shit on their hardware? Is purchasing smaller companies who look competitive in a very small area or using their ideas and then defeating them in court with MS endless financial might innovation?

    With the extraordinary financial power of Microsoft and the huge talented teams of programmers which they can afford, why can't they make a kernel as secure as OpenBSD's or even Apple's Mac OSX? Surely with all that money they can provide security and functionality! But no, they concentrate on innovative marketing campains which seek to convince the general public that they need Microsofts latest "innovations".

    Bill founded what is now the largest software company in the world, and wether or not you agree with him, he has made a important contribution to the computing industry: Microsoft brought desktop computing to the home user.

    No, I believe that Apple brought desktop computing to the home user. To add insult to injury, MacOS was very stable considering that they only recently got memory protection with OSX.

    Microsoft now dominates that market through knife-in-the-back tactics. I don't know what would be worse, being a friend of Microsoft or being a foe. I would not put Bill Gates up on a pedestal because he managed desktop dominance. Look at how he achieved it.

    They have not innovated as much as they have simply lifted from elsewhere.

    Now, be honest. How many of us had our first computer experience with MS-DOS or Windows 3.1?

    Commodore 64 actually. Yes, I was using Mircrosoft BASIC. But I was more interested in 6502 assembler.

    Do you think that if computers still consisted on thin-client-server models based on huge VAX mainframes, that Joe and Jane Smith would be able to dial-in to AOL and connect to thousands of people around the world?

    Yes. I'm known to surf the net on a DEC VT220 at times.

    Would the Internet have blossomed into the vast information network it is today without the aid of easy-to-use software from Microsoft?

    It is a vast information network? I think the quality of the information on the internet was much better back in 1991 (when I got on) than it is now. It has become a great big stinking sewer of mostly misinformation because every moron with a computer now gets on with his Wintel PC and AOL account.

    How about Grandma who wants to set up a webcam so she can chat with her grandchildren? She doesn't want to have to sit and hack kernels for hours. She wants Plug-and-Play, baby.

    If she bought an Apple Mac way back when they delivered desktop computing and upgraded as she liked along the Apple path, she'd be using a web cam if that is what she wanted. She might even be showing off her wrinkley old bits to the World for $4.95 per month.

    Look, disagree all you like, but thanks to things like Windows, Office, and MSN, modern computing has been made easy and affordable to everyone, thanks to pioneers like Bill Gates.

    Affordable? When the latest full version of MS Office is released in Australia, it typically costs around one thousand Australian dollars. The OS' are expensive too. Unless of course, I get them cheap with my next PC and MS succeeds in dominating one more desktop.

    --
    A Commodore, an assembler tape, and one bored kid

    --
    War crimes, torture, lies, illegal spying... Would someone give Bush a blowjob, already, so he can be impeached?
  246. Re:Bill Gates, Hall of Fame Hacker? (P.S. First Po by BJH · · Score: 1

    Those were minicomputers, dude.

  247. Forgot Ada Byron by Shipud · · Score: 1

    And Charles Babbage. The first hackers.

    --
    /sdrawkcab si gis siht
  248. Re:Bill Gates, Hall of Fame Hacker? (P.S. First Po by Arkaengel · · Score: 1

    If Wozniak is (correctly) on the list instead of Jobs, then Paul Allen should be on it instead of Bill Gates. Gates isn't really a tech guy, more of a business type.

  249. Re:news? this is over three years old. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    news? this is over three years old.

    It's news for nerds, and thus news to nerds.

  250. They might know what they're saying... by snaphu · · Score: 1

    Although there are quite a few comments about how poorly the terminoligy is used, they do have a page on "lingo" as the link says. To my (more than likely) limited knowledge, these definitions are correct, however poorly used in the bios' section.
    http://tlc.discovery.com/convergence/hackers/gloss ary/glossary.html
    A rather well done page, but a poorly designed website I think...

  251. Re:Bill Gates, Hall of Fame Hacker? (P.S. First Po by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I agree, he certainly popularized the trend of exchanging money for goods and services.

    Enough posting for today, I'm going to go hack my bicycle to the theater and hack a movie.

  252. Re:Stealing the Mona Lisa... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look Bill Gates did not even own a copy of DOS when IBM went looking for one. He just intercepted the request from IBM, offered his own copy (vapourware) and when the verbal was approved he went out and bought QDOS - renamed it MS-DOS and the rest his history...is that fraud?

  253. Re:Stealing the Mona Lisa... by fruey · · Score: 1
    OK so I was wrong about the MHz, because as a matter of fact it looked a lot like this

    Now I was pretty young at the time, so I don't remember exact specs. Quoted from the web page above

    Ericsson PC : 4.77 Mhz. RAM: 128 kB., ROM: 8kB., OS: MS DOS 3.0 Hard disk: 10 Mb. Floppy disk: 5.25 inch 360 kB

    My particular version did not have a hard disk, but 10MiB sounds about right for a more expensive model that shipped with hard drive the time. The next PC we had was an Amstrad 1512 and that got retrofitted with a 30MiB hard drive.

    I said I was probably wrong about the DOS version. The clock speed was a total guess.

    --
    Conversion Rate Optimisation French / English consultant
  254. Re:Bill Gates, Hall of Fame Hacker? (P.S. First Po by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Altair on the cover of PE was an empty case. MITS had shipped the very first Altair to them but it was lost in transit. They didn't have time to wire & test a new machine in time for the PE article so they slapped the switches through the front panel, put the lid on and photographed it.

    Homebrew had only been around for a couple of months before the PE Altair article and were mostly building TV Typewriters or a handful of very very simple 4004 based machines. MITS started shipping Altair 8008 kits within a couple of months of the PE article, and the first one assembled was by Steve Dompier, a Homebrew attendee.

  255. Re:Bill Gates, Hall of Fame Hacker? (P.S. First Po by Grayswan · · Score: 1

    I once knew a guy how said he met Bill Gates once. He (Gates) was handing out free Windows 1.0 disks at Comdex. Apparently it was just a single 1.4" disk, but I guess it existed.

    --
    If you open your mind too wide, people will throw trash in it.
  256. Re:Bill Gates, Hall of Fame Hacker? (P.S. First Po by Mr.+Mikey · · Score: 1
    Born in 1980? I graduated high school in 1980.


    The first computer I owned was a VIC-20, followed by an Amiga 1000, then Amiga 2000 (which I still own). I didn't get another machine until 1998, when I built myself a Linux box. The first computer I ever used was a TRS-80 Model I, which I used to teach myself BASIC. Ah, those were the days...

    --
    wants to be the first monkey to touch the monolith
  257. Re:Bill Gates, Hall of Fame Hacker? (P.S. First Po by pavon · · Score: 1

    True, but this more like adding Micheal Jordan to the baseball hall of fame because he is really famous and was also a pro baseball player. Bill Gates was never famous for being a good hacker - while he was a definately good hacker, he is not in the top 10. What he is famous for is being a shrewd businessman.