Slashdot Mirror


Build Your Own Imperial Star Destroyer

tashanna writes "I got an e-mail from my brother with a link to this. Someone has built an Imperial Star Destroyer model from the original Star Wars movie that's appropriately-sized for the 4" action figures. The guy made it with an armory, bridge, cell bay, computer room, engineering (split over 2 levels), Darth Vader's chamber, conference room, troop rest room, medical bay and it measures 2 meters, by 1.5 meters, by 1 meter and is for sale on Ebay. There are interior photos on the eBay site. Ummm... WOW!"

234 comments

  1. Not So Fast by JollyGoodChase · · Score: 4, Funny

    That's not Imperial, that's butter!

  2. Come on! by Admiral+Lazzurs · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I know this post is kinda relevant and I am even glad to see it here but has anyone noticed that this is also just using /. to advertise the ebay auction to the target audience?

    Then again, well done for getting free ads on /. :)

    1. Re:Come on! by G-funk · · Score: 4, Funny

      Not to mention that if that model is in scale with 4" toys, that's the biggest 5 year old in the world.

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
    2. Re:Come on! by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      " but has anyone noticed that this is also just using /. to advertise the ebay auction to the target audience?"

      So?

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    3. Re:Come on! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      slashdotters are cynical bunch remember? we don't like it when someone tries to profit at our mindshares expense, especially when it's not even a cool hack. thats not news for nerds....... its shit for dupes.

    4. Re:Come on! by nuba · · Score: 3, Funny


      Then again, well done for getting free ads on /. :)
      </snip>

      How do you know it was free?
      *duck*

    5. Re:Come on! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The /. ad^h^harticle doesn't say to scale, it says appropriately sized.

    6. Re:Come on! by mark-t · · Score: 1
      Actually, I don't think slashdotters *ARE* the real target audience in this case... although we probably know people who _are_ in the target audience.

      This SW Destroyer is not a model replica, it is a _TOY_, intended for play, not for mere admiration. It doesn't matter that it's not to scale because Slashdotters would do well to remember that a 10 year old kid isn't going to care about that when they really enjoy playing with it. That it's not to scale poses absolutely no inconvenience at all to an enthusiastic imagination.

    7. Re:Come on! by antic · · Score: 1

      You'll note that delivery/shipping is free. To me, that suggests the inclusion of a hyperspace drive. And in that case, anything under a few million is a bargain, even if you're only teleporting barbie dolls across the planet!

      --
      'Thats they exact same thing a banana wrench monkey.'
    8. Re:Come on! by NormalVisual · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah I was thinking the same thing. I guess Nigel Tufnel sketched it out on a napkin for him. :-)

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    9. Re:Come on! by thunderflash21 · · Score: 0
      I know this post is kinda relevant and I am even glad to see it here but has anyone noticed that this is also just using /. to advertise the ebay auction to the target audience? Then again, well done for getting free ads on /. :)

      I dont think the poster has any relation to the person who built this. Plus the auction ended before this story was posted. I dont think the poster had any more motivation to submit this to slashdot other than to get a chuckle from us.

      --
      My spoon is too big.
    10. Re:Come on! by tashanna · · Score: 1

      For what it's worth, I'm not affiliated with the maker and I couldn't find any other links pointing at the star destroyer. It is pretty cool...

      Tash

    11. Re:Come on! by dilweed · · Score: 1

      And all of this free advertising has gotten him exactly *zero* bids.

    12. Re:Come on! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      thats not news for nerds....... its shit for dupes.

      *cough* thinkgeek.org *cough*

  3. No longer for sale. by bobobobo · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Well the auction was stopped early. Wonder why?

    1. Re:No longer for sale. by metlin · · Score: 5, Informative

      Look at the bid history. It looks like he ended the listing early. And if that page were to be believed, the retractors have stated that they have been unable to get in touch with the seller.

      And immediately thereafter, an "ad" for this gets posted on Slashdot? Makes you wonder you know...

    2. Re:No longer for sale. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I think this guy might be quite clever. He's using eBay to host pics, for free, that can withstand a slashdotting! Of course he doesn't want to sell it, there's no way he can get anywhere near what his time and effort that went into is worth.

    3. Re:No longer for sale. by Datasage · · Score: 1

      I dont think he was getting what he wanted for it... it appears it was ended just before the auction would have normally ended.

      --
      In America we are imprisoned by our fear of them.
    4. Re:No longer for sale. by bm_luethke · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Well, the person did say they were selling it because they couldn't take it with them when they moved. Maybe they either are not moving (heh, maybe they are in the tech industry and that dream job turned out to be less than expected) or found a way to take it with them. The person has a high enough feedback rating I would give the benefit of doubt if I were into such things. After all, he did say shipping was up to the purchaser so I doubt he knew a way to transport ti to wherever he was going.

      I know that had I made it and under the circumstances described I would kill the auction if I had found a way to transport it at a reasonable cost.

      --
      ------- Sorry about the spelling, I suffer from two problems. Dyslexia makes it difficult to spell well, lazy makes it
    5. Re:No longer for sale. by blanks · · Score: 1

      No the reason why it was taken off was because it was listed on fark.com 2 days ago :).

    6. Re:No longer for sale. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      That's why ebay has the "reserve". If you're not willing to part with it for less than an amount, USE THE RESERVE. Ending the auction early just pisses all the bidders off.

      I figure the guy ended the auction early to sell it "off ebay" and avoid the final value fees. Hell, he probably "sold" it to three or four people "off ebay". With it not being an actual auction sale, they can't leave him negative feedback when he screws them.

    7. Re:No longer for sale. by antek9 · · Score: 1

      Not exactly for free, especially not supersized pictures, but worth the price obviously and a nice idea none the less.

      --
      A World in a Grain of Sand / Heaven in a Wild Flower,
      Infinity in the Palm of your Hand / And Eternity in an Hour.
    8. Re:No longer for sale. by antek9 · · Score: 1

      Sure, he sold it to ten people off ebay, and all of them came around to pick it up and hand over the money. Notice something?

      --
      A World in a Grain of Sand / Heaven in a Wild Flower,
      Infinity in the Palm of your Hand / And Eternity in an Hour.
    9. Re:No longer for sale. by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Actually, it said shipping was free within the united kingdom.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    10. Re:No longer for sale. by bm_luethke · · Score: 1

      I know this is slashdot and all, but had you actually read the product description before replying:

      Now the bad news... There is no way I can take this to the post office. Believe me it is big. Collection by transit van or trailer is essential. I can provide sufficient packing material for its journey but collection will have to be made soon as possible on completion of the auction. The reason for this is we are moving abroad and can?t take it with us. I believe it is possible for a courier company to collect the ship but this arrangement will have to be made by the buyer..

      so his "free shipping" in the slot by ebay means you owe him nothing for shipping, not that he is going to pay it.

      --
      ------- Sorry about the spelling, I suffer from two problems. Dyslexia makes it difficult to spell well, lazy makes it
  4. Special Modified Star Destroyer by QEDog · · Score: 5, Funny

    Comes with the Chewbacca Defense system!

    --
    "There is no teacher but the enemy."-Mazer Rackham
    1. Re:Special Modified Star Destroyer by CheshireCat · · Score: 1

      What, it smells terrible?

    2. Re:Special Modified Star Destroyer by Rone · · Score: 4, Funny

      Comes with the Chewbacca Defense system!

      What are you babbling about? A Chewbacca defense system?

      That does NOT MAKE SENSE!

    3. Re:Special Modified Star Destroyer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes it does, my big fearsome 10lb terrier. With enough strength to tear the limbs off a rebel spy, after a few cut's with a vibroblade.

  5. Yeah but does it come with a wookie? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You'll need something to clean up all that gathering dust...

  6. All I have to say is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    All I have to say is, it is amazing what people spend time on. (This is not an insult, it is just interesting that people have such wildly different interests).


    reeddavid.com

  7. The Imperator by OlaL · · Score: 5, Interesting
  8. Building models for profit by dj245 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Now, to me, selling on ebay really kills the mood of the whole article. "Wow. Star Wars widget. Neat. Hard work. Tons of detail. Oh yeah selling on ebay."

    If the point was not for the person who made it to enjoy it and keep it around, then what was the point? I know that if I spent that many hours on it *for fun* then I wouldn't be selling it on no ebay.

    I donno, maybe the guy has bills to pay, maybe he didn't want it kicking aroundm, taking up space. But when these things are sold on ebay in the same article, it kind of kills the whole "coolness" mood for me. Its like they are pimping the auction to jack up the price. Anyone else feel the same?

    --
    Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
    1. Re:Building models for profit by minkeyboodle · · Score: 5, Informative

      Read the auction. He says he's moving abroad and can't take it with him.

    2. Re:Building models for profit by Voltronalpha · · Score: 0, Redundant

      He said he is moving and can't take it with him......

      --
      There is evidence to prove both Democrats and Republicans are lying cocksuckers. Vote independently.
    3. Re:Building models for profit by chrispl · · Score: 1, Informative

      If he had just posted some pictures of it somewhere the server would have been slashdotted/farked to hell almost instantly. Behold the power of ebays servers!

      Thanks to this auction thousands, if not millions of people will see his work that probably would have not otherwise. I have seen a link to this auction on several web sites I frequent so it is getting quite a bit of attention.

      --
      What post? The one you're carrying inside your rusty innards!
    4. Re:Building models for profit by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

      He says he's been working on it for three years. Typically when one is leaving the country its not a spur of the moment thing (ie, why start a huge project if you know you have to get rid of it)

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    5. Re:Building models for profit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      He says he's been working on it for three years. Typically when one is leaving the country its not a spur of the moment thing (ie, why start a huge project if you know you have to get rid of it)

      There's quite a gap between spur of the moment and three years.

    6. Re:Building models for profit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, he probably got an amazing opportunity from Nigeria.

    7. Re:Building models for profit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      YAR"SG"WJTCABAHR.

      (Yet Another Retarded "Smart Guy" Who Jumps To Conclusions And Blithely Assumes He's Right.)

    8. Re:Building models for profit by Flabby+Boohoo · · Score: 1

      What does moving his wife have to do with anything?

    9. Re:Building models for profit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you mean, he's moving in with a broad and she won't let him take it with him?

    10. Re:Building models for profit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it doesn't say when he built it, just that it took 3 years, you are assuming that it was finished yesterday

    11. Re:Building models for profit by wondafucka · · Score: 1
      If someone made a *working* lightsaber, and then sold it on ebay, would you still hold the same opinion?

    12. Re:Building models for profit by CrazyTalk · · Score: 1

      I don't know, I spent a year in England once with only a few months notice (I'm from the US). Maybe he's moving to Bangalore to nab one of those cushy $4,000/year IT jobs.

  9. Ah! by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 5, Funny
    To put it in classic Slashdot form:

    1)Waste hours of life building scale star-destroyer model.
    2)Post star-destroyer for sale on ebay.
    3)Post story on /. with link to auction
    4)PROFIT!!!!

    Now before you mod me flamebait, realize this is a joke, and dammit I want one of these, but am both too poor and too lazy to ever have one.

    --
    Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    1. Re:Ah! by chrispl · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Extensive study has shown that ebay itself IS the missing second step in the equation!

      Try it! It works in almost any permutation!

      Example:

      1. Steal underwear
      2. ebay
      3. Profit!!

      It fits!

      --
      What post? The one you're carrying inside your rusty innards!
    2. Re:Ah! by JoeBaldwin · · Score: 1

      So SCO's new strategy is...

      eBay itself.

      Goddammit, he's right!

    3. Re:Ah! by donscarletti · · Score: 1

      A seedy Tokyo streetcourner could work just as well as step two of that sequence.

      --
      When Argumentum ad Hominem falls short, try Argumentum ad Matrem
    4. Re:Ah! by telloc · · Score: 1

      I'm convinced a more general solution is like this:

      1. X
      2. Internet
      3. Profit!

  10. 125k hits and still no bids by Voltronalpha · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It really must have taken a lot of work to build it; he built this out of love I'm sure.

    Too bad he didn't realize that the world is bigger than Swindon, Wiltshire UK, and fails to be willing to ship it. After 125,000 page views on this auction mostly from nowhere near him he just terribly screwed himself.

    What a waste of free exposure!

    --
    There is evidence to prove both Democrats and Republicans are lying cocksuckers. Vote independently.
    1. Re:125k hits and still no bids by Voltronalpha · · Score: 1

      Ooops looks like the listing ended 14 hours ago!

      --
      There is evidence to prove both Democrats and Republicans are lying cocksuckers. Vote independently.
  11. umm.. what's he big deal? by Anubis333 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The thing just looks like a big balsa wood model, and it isn't very detailed. I am a model maker, and I feel the creator could have chunked a lot of plastic ship models for nurnies and greebles.. He also, could have chunked old star wars toys for control panels etc. It really just looks like a large DIY project, and not a playable toy. I was a kid not too long ago, and I wouldn't really wanna play with some big balsa wood, grey-pained thing. It also looks like it would also break too easily.

    I mean I wouldn't crit, but when you put it out here, it's open season; not to mention this shouldn't have been on here anyway; it's like an advertisement.

    1. Re:umm.. what's he big deal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you look at the pictures of the inside?

    2. Re:umm.. what's he big deal? by zangdesign · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The thing just looks like a big balsa wood model, and it isn't very detailed

      Yeah, and even more disappointing - it's not to scale. I mean, jeez, what's the point?

      /kidding

      --
      To celebrate the occasion of my 1000th post, I will post no more forever on Slashdot. Goodbye.
    3. Re:umm.. what's he big deal? by Vellmont · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm glad I'm not the only one underwhelmed. It looks like painted wood. The finish is rather flat, and the "details" looked glued on. Not worthy of being on slashdot, especially since this is just a promo for an auction.

      --
      AccountKiller
    4. Re:umm.. what's he big deal? by MoneyT · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Eh, not being a modler, I couldn't comment on the nurnies and greebles, but it's certainly not the most impresive model one could build. Some of the dimensions look really off, and certainyl some detail is missing, but overall it is an impressive piece of work.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    5. Re:umm.. what's he big deal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As far as the detail goes, it compares pretty well with 70s-era toys.

      I was surprised when I recently dug out some old Micronauts and such. Those things sucked.

    6. Re:umm.. what's he big deal? by NortWind · · Score: 1

      You can see the plywood on the edges of the room partitions. When I saw that, I thought that this was more like a dollhouse in construction, rather than a properly done Sci-Fi model. The scale being way off doesn't bother me so much, the real world rears its ugly head every now and then.

    7. Re:umm.. what's he big deal? by Hal-9001 · · Score: 1
      > > The thing just looks like a big balsa wood model, and it isn't very detailed
      >
      > Yeah, and even more disappointing - it's not to scale. I mean, jeez, what's the point?
      Even more disappointing than that, it doesn't work! :-p
      --
      "It take 9 months to bear a child, no matter how many women you assign to the job."
  12. I don't have a problem with the ad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't have a problem with it being an "ad" if you can really call it one. But it has nothing to do with building your own. There's no instructions. It's just that some dude built one. That's what the topic should have been: "Some dudbe built a Star Destroyer".

    Who cares if it's an ad? It's still really cool to look at the pictures, regardless if it's for sale or not. Window shopping is cool.

  13. Is this legal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Pissing off Kuat Drive Yards by copying their patended ship design seems like a real bad idea.

    He should have waited until we have atleast one orbital defense platform up.

    1. Re:Is this legal? by Saberwind · · Score: 2, Funny

      Darth Sidious will *make* it legal, and bog down their lawyers in procedures.

  14. What a brilliant idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny
    Advertising your ebay auctions through an article on /. Brilliant!

    All I gotta do is come up with some sort of geeky spin on a complete set of Mama's Family videotapes and I'll finally get these goddamned things off my hands.

    1. Re:What a brilliant idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      first you have to admit to owning them...

    2. Re:What a brilliant idea! by Zork+the+Almighty · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing that reading comprehension is not your strong point.

      --

      In Soviet America the banks rob you!
  15. I always wanted one of these... by Datasage · · Score: 3, Informative

    Its not complete though. my estimation to allow for 4" figures would put the scale at about 1:25, in its entirety, it would be about 64 meters long. Maybe a bit smaller. Try building that :)

    --
    In America we are imprisoned by our fear of them.
    1. Re:I always wanted one of these... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dome homes are a popular alternative design. A Death Star home would be handy for dealing with those pesky salesmen.

    2. Re:I always wanted one of these... by CaptainCheese · · Score: 1

      when it said 'appropriately-sized for the 4" action figures' I took that to mean it was to scale.

      I was bitterly disappointed to see the ISDjr on sale!

      --
      -- .sigs are a waste of data...turn them off...
    3. Re:I always wanted one of these... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wouldn't that make the people 100" tall?

      Luke was maybe 5'9" (69") tall.

    4. Re:I always wanted one of these... by TekPolitik · · Score: 1
      when it said 'appropriately-sized for the 4" action figures' I took that to mean it was to scale.

      Me too. I thought "damn, where would he fit that thing?". The listing mentions it has one of Darth Vader's chambers too, which means it must have been meant to be a Super Star Destroyer, which is 12.8km long. A 4" action figure is a 1:18 scale, so this would require the model to be 711m long, or about twice the length of the largest aircraft carrier in the world (costing $4.5billion).

      Now that would be an impressive feat of modelling, but at a huge cost. I guess Billy G has a new project for when he retires. Or maybe he's waiting until his wealth grows to the $26trillion odd that would be required for a 1:1 scale model.

  16. "Appropriately sized" by gmhowell · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Nope, this is not a scale sized model. It's the equivalent of the Millenium Falcon: lots of play areas, you can do nifty things, but you can't hold a dozen squadrons of TIE fighters in it.

    Still, much better than the POS 'Star Destroyer' that Kenner sold.

    --
    Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
  17. nurnies and greebles by veg_all · · Score: 3, Funny

    You, sir, have hit the nail on the head.

    I couldn't put my fingers on exactly what it was that was missing!

    --
    grammar-lesson free since 1999. (rescinded - 2005)
    1. Re:nurnies and greebles by SailFly · · Score: 1


      This is about Greebles (or nurnies): Greeble

      Plus there is a great picture of Imperial Stardestroyer, and references to Star Trek, Borg, etc.

  18. Err by neuro.slug · · Score: 5, Funny

    But it doesn't have a Mr. Coffee or Mr. Radar! Damn you, Lone Star!!

    1. Re:Err by Saberwind · · Score: 1

      It probably doesn't even transform into Mega Maid.

  19. This is not the forum for this. by dj245 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Ok, we have a link to an ebay auction (which is closed by the way), a link to IMDB, and a link to a page generalizing the star destroyer.

    Mod me down, troll, offtopic, but is this really the right forum to be discussing this? There are no plans on how you can be "building your own star destroyer". They is no page on how he made it. When /. covers these sort of things there is usually lots of coverage. Plans, how-tos, "where to buy parts". This? Nope, just the ebay auction page.

    Maybe it isn't disturbing enough, but I think this really belongs here. A forum to comment and post funny and disturbing ebay auctions.

    --
    Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
    1. Re:This is not the forum for this. by dj245 · · Score: 1
      Maybe it isn't disturbing enough, but I think this really belongs here (disturbingauctions daily). A forum to comment and post funny and disturbing ebay auctions.

      Gettin way off topic here, but from that page, Hopelessly addicted to ebay Barbie"

      --
      Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
  20. But where oh where by modder · · Score: 2, Funny

    But where does Barbie fit in?

  21. Oh boy! by Bon+bons · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yes! Now us (boys) men can take our (dolls) collectable figurines and (play) display them in a scale size (doll-house) terrarium!

  22. Very nice, but.... by GFLPraxis · · Score: 3, Informative

    It's very well done, but...

    The maker apparently doesn't know much about Star Wars. He calls it a "scale" replica...considering a Star Destroyer is supposed to be 1.6 kilometers long, those little model people are what, 500 feet tall?

    And the bridge section shouldn't be near as fat.
    He even says that a Star Destroyer boasts "8 laser batteries" when it's a well known fact that it has 60 turbolaser cannons...not 8. If it had 8 laser cannons, two X-wings would outgun it, lol.

    1. Re:Very nice, but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      The maker DID know that: "Although not entirely screen accurate (it would have been the length of my street for that)"

    2. Re:Very nice, but.... by Have+Blue · · Score: 3, Informative

      A battery is multiple lasers.

    3. Re:Very nice, but.... by jonnystiph · · Score: 1
      it's a well known fact that it has 60 turbolaser cannons

      This is why I read slashdot. Bravo man, bravo.

      --

      If we don't make light of everything, we are just stumbling in the dark - Blank

    4. Re:Very nice, but.... by steve's+nose+is+blee · · Score: 3, Funny

      Ahh X-wings boast 4 laser cannon and two front mounted photon torpedo tubes, two x-wings would match it if it had 8 turbolasers.

      Did anyone else read his background on the ship. He's calling it a super-star destroyer, saying it's the one Vader hunted down Leia's Corillian Corvette with in ANH, this is incorrect, Vader grabbed Leia in an "Imperial Class Star Destroyer" The older, smaller versions were called "Victory Class Star Destroyers" and were only a half kilometer long. The "Super Class Star Destroyer" you see plunging into the second death star in ROTJ is Vader's Capital ship and is close to 5 kilometers in length.

      Geez people, get your facts straight =)

    5. Re:Very nice, but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So a 9 volt battery is, what... 72 lasers worth?

    6. Re:Very nice, but.... by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1
      ...60 turbolaser cannons...not 8. If it had 8 laser cannons, two X-wings would outgun it, lol.

      I know...That's ridiculous! Worst, model, ever!

      ;)

    7. Re:Very nice, but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      He even says that a Star Destroyer boasts "8 laser batteries" when it's a well known fact that it has 60 turbolaser cannons...not 8. If it had 8 laser cannons, two X-wings would outgun it, lol.

      Damn, dude, you *really* need to get laid!

    8. Re:Very nice, but.... by bwy · · Score: 2, Funny

      He calls it a "scale" replica...considering a Star Destroyer is supposed to be 1.6 kilometers long, those little model people are what, 500 feet tall?

      Why do you think he is selling it? He realizes he seriously fucked up the scale and dimensions. He's trying to unload this piece of shit to get money for more materials to build a new one that isn't such a royal embarrassment.

      If it had 8 laser cannons, two X-wings would outgun it, lol.

      Well, you see ordinarily this would be true, but not in this dipshit's world. Realizing his first screw up, he built a scaled version of an X-Wing that only has 2 CO2 powered BB guns on the bow. 8 lasers vs. 2 BB guns... thats about to scale I guess.

    9. Re:Very nice, but.... by C0vardeAn0nim0 · · Score: 1

      actually the "super star destroyer" in ROTJ is the executor, and it's 12.8 kilometers long. the 5, sometimes 8 kilometers long information is inacurate. a myth created by badly researched RPG games.

      here't the authoritative information: http://www.starwars.com/databank/starship/supersta rdestroyer/

      --
      What ? Me, worry ?
    10. Re:Very nice, but.... by Fear+the+Clam · · Score: 1

      And AA batteries are for shooting down planes.

    11. Re:Very nice, but.... by steve's+nose+is+blee · · Score: 1

      You are correct Suh! (southern accent)
      I shifted my data to the left a bit on that one.

      However this ship is no Super Class Star Destroyer,
      It's not the Star Destroyer you're looking for,
      You may go about your business,
      move along....

      =)

    12. Re:Very nice, but.... by Hal-9001 · · Score: 1

      To be more precise, a battery is multiple cannon, laser or otherwise.

      --
      "It take 9 months to bear a child, no matter how many women you assign to the job."
    13. Re:Very nice, but.... by Jugalator · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Vader grabbed Leia in an "Imperial Class Star Destroyer"

      ... although that designation has been debated. See also this quote from Warships of the Empire :

      Imperator-class star destroyer.

      "The common mile-long Imperial star destroyer. Imperator, the first ship in its class, was built at the KDY shipyards at Gyndine for use in the Corellian sector fleet early in the reign of Emperor Palpatine. [Is Gyndine in or near the Corellian sector?] By the time of Palpatine's fall these ships were ubiquitous galaxy-wide as the stock destroyer vessel of Imperial Navy's territorial fleets, numbering no less than several tens of thousands of ships.

      These vessels were also colloquially known as "Impstars" or "Imperial star destroyers", particularly among the forces of the Rebel Alliance and New Republic. (Of course all star destroyer designs of the Imperial Navy were "Imperial", just as the rebel Admiral Ackbar commanded Calamarian cruisers which nonetheless were not "Calamarian-class" star cruisers!)"


      The older, smaller versions were called "Victory Class Star Destroyers" and were only a half kilometer long.

      True :-)

      The "Super Class Star Destroyer" you see plunging into the second death star in ROTJ is Vader's Capital ship and is close to 5 kilometers in length.

      I'm not sure there is such a thing -- either a "Super Star Destroyer" (from computer games I think) or Executor-class Star Destroyers / Command Ships, from Vader's Executor in ROTJ.

      All this is further discussed here:
      STAR WARS: Technical Commentaries

      Thank god for that document, that shows someone else is more geeky than me!
      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    14. Re:Very nice, but.... by FinalCut · · Score: 1

      for example a PATRIOT missle system battery in the US Army consists of 8 launchers (each holding 4 missiles) well that was PATRIOT I, I think the newer PATRIOT II can hold 16 missiles per launcher.

      A Battery in the US Army is the Air Defense portion of the Army equivilent to a Company in the rest of the Army such as Engineers or Infantry.

    15. Re:Very nice, but.... by LoocSiMit · · Score: 1
      He even says that a Star Destroyer boasts "8 laser batteries" when it's a well known fact that it has 60 turbolaser cannons...not 8.

      He went with Li-Ion, so he didn't need as many batteries as the original.

      --
      Intellectual Property
      Intellectual: of the mind
      Property: that over which one has control
  23. umm..what's he big deal?-Snap, crackle, and...oops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "nurnies and greebles.."?

    That's geek speak for breakies, and snappies, right?

  24. This model is way out of scale by Animats · · Score: 0, Redundant
    Now wait a minute. That was supposed to be a big starship, on a par with an aircraft carrier. According to Starship Dimensions, an Imperial Star Destroyer is 1.6 km long. This model is 1/20 scale, so it depicts a ship about 40 meters long. That's roughly the size of a Coast Guard cutter.

    This isn't a model. This is a kid's dollhouse.

    1. Re:This model is way out of scale by Infonaut · · Score: 4, Funny
      This isn't a model. This is a kid's dollhouse.

      What gave you that idea? The picture of the kid next to it, the 4" Star Wars dolls shown inside the Star Destroyer, or the text indicating that it was made for play?

      --
      Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ
    2. Re:This model is way out of scale by johnw · · Score: 1

      Even more than you say - at 1/20 scale (which is about right given a 4" figure) the model should be 80 metres long.

    3. Re:This model is way out of scale by paazin · · Score: 2, Informative

      I believe somewhere in the description he does mention that it is out of scale (because if he were to make it completely in scale it would be as big as a city block) but most of the really 'cool' stuff is there.

    4. Re:This model is way out of scale by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, it was the fact that its a girl in the photo.

  25. thanks! by jellocat · · Score: 5, Funny

    I read the summery and was like, "What is a Star Wars"?!?! Then I was relieved to see you had a link so I could easily find out more about those Star Wars.

    Love,
    Duh McObvious

  26. I brought up a similar point... by NarrMaster · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    When this came up on the Delorean time machine article. But did anyone mod me +4 informative? Noooooo..... stupid mods....

    --
    That's right. All your base.
  27. My 25th birthday by Myolp · · Score: 3, Funny

    On my 25th birthday I got a Death Star replica from my friends. It was built from an inflatable bathball and a large plastic bag. Unfortunetaly it was destroyed by some rebels armed with alcohol a couple of months later. Anyway, while it was still intact I used it to threaten my roommates when they "forgot" to do their dishes.

    1. Re:My 25th birthday by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you a woman? If you are you are a feminist bitch.

  28. Re:Think that is weird by mattjb0010 · · Score: 1, Interesting

    That's not weird. Now, an Erdös number of 5 for US$354, that's weird. I'd bid, but my Erdös number is already 5.

  29. check out the counter on the page by minus_273 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    rarely does slashdot link to a page with alot of BW/ power AND a counter. heh you can refresh to see the slashdot effect in realtime.

    --
    The war with islam is a war on the beast
    The war on terror is a war for peace
    1. Re:check out the counter on the page by prezninja · · Score: 1

      And how do I know I'm not just seeing the People-Trying-To-Observe-The-Slashdot-Effect-In-Re altime effect?

  30. Yeah, more like an Imperial tugboat. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It would make a good garbage scow.

  31. Re:umm..what's he big deal?-Snap, crackle, and...o by Anubis333 · · Score: 5, Informative

    I am a 3D modeler/TD by trade, heh I guess that lingo isn't common geek speak, here is an article on 'greebling', or 'adding nurnies and greebles' to an object. It's basically the art of making up hi-tech looking crap. The original star destroyers were greebled with plastic navy ship parts and other crap. Interestingly enough, i think they were somewhere around the size of this guys toy; i may be wrong...

  32. Wow by noewun · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I mean, like, wow. That's an impressive bit of model building, fer shur.

    --
    I am a believer of momentum and curves.
  33. But... It's not a scale model! by Cordath · · Score: 4, Informative

    I'm sorry, but the anal retentive streak in me just wouldn't let this go. In order for a Star Destroyer to be built to the same scale as 4" action figures it would need to be over 75 meters long! Now *that* would be a freakin' lego project!

  34. News for Nerds. Stuff that matters by dawg+ball · · Score: 1

    I'm pretty sure that the auction of a Death Star replica on Ebay matters to a number of people, many of whom are also possibly Nerds, but doesn't this kinda undermine the credibility of /. in some way?

    I mean, is /. allowing itself to become another sales and marketing tool on the net?

    1. Re:News for Nerds. Stuff that matters by OrangeTide · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yea. It's wrong to make money on anything.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    2. Re:News for Nerds. Stuff that matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I'm sorry, but you didn't just use "credibility" and "/." in the same sentence, did you?

      I must have missed the <sarchasm> tags...

    3. Re:News for Nerds. Stuff that matters by anothy · · Score: 1
      but doesn't this kinda undermine the credibility of /. in some way?
      heh. how's that go again? "You must be new here." yeah, that's it.
      --

      i speak for myself and those who like what i say.
    4. Re:News for Nerds. Stuff that matters by f0rt0r · · Score: 1

      As others have mentioned before, the problem isn't that the article links to an eBay auction, but rather the title 'Build Your Own Imperial Star Destroyer' is more than misleading as the informatio in the linked sites don't give you the slighest clue as how to build your own star destroyer, but rather show you one that someone else built and now wish to sell.

      --
      I can't afford a sig!
  35. It isn't working for me... by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 1

    Try it! It works in almost any permutation!

    1. Build lame eBay clone that's buggy, insecure and has no user-base
    2. eBay
    3. Profit!

    Hmmm, seems like "almost" isn't working for my dotcom-path-to-richness masterplan.

    --

    "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    1. Re:It isn't working for me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, you could print up some crap with your lame clone's logo, autograph them, and have a special edition sale of those rare collectors items on ebay, resulting in Profit! Tell people it'll be worth a fortune when you're famous.

  36. Agreed!! Mod Parent UP by snooo53 · · Score: 5, Informative
    This article has the worst title ever! What's the deal here? Is slashdot trying to get a ratings boost or something? This is the kind of misleading crap article title you'd expect to see on Fox News or CNN. Where are the plans???

    Okay, fine, I'll be editor for the day. (5 seconds of googling later...) Make your own Star Destroyer.

    --
    The sending of this message pretty much inconveniences everyone involved.
  37. Re:But... It's not a scale model! by thehomeland · · Score: 5, Informative

    ... it would need to be over 75 meters long!

    That's exactly what I was thinking. To scale with the standard action figures would mean it'd be larger than you could possibly ship (pun intended) and the five-year-old would probably be able to fit *inside* one of the circular engines on the back. Now, the rooms inside based on the photos look almost to scale, but there should be like umpteen thousand rooms inside one SSD. Compare to the regular sized tie fighters that the figures fit in. You might be able to house ten fighters in that whole model..

  38. Re:umm..what's he big deal?-Snap, crackle, and...o by Saeger · · Score: 5, Interesting
    'Greebling' on supposedly futuristic spacecraft has always pissed me off because it's almost always overblown and only put there to make the object "busy looking" and for audiences used to WW2-battleships-in-space. It's almost as if the ships were built with irregular pieces of purposely discolored sheetmetal in a shipyard, and then pipes and other techy doodads tacked on later for style'n.

    I'm a fan of the sleek ship designs that keep their junk on the inside where it belongs. Of course, it's harder to judge scale when you can't see the irregular pieces of purposely discolored sheetmetal put into place by human hands (ugh)... but it makes more sense that way.

    --

    --
    Power to the Peaceful
  39. hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    0 bids on ebay... need i say more...

  40. Re:But... It's not a scale model! by samadhi · · Score: 4, Informative

    Maybe you should get a bit more anal about reading the article.

    > Although not entirely screen accurate (it would have been the length of my street for that) the distinctive shape is unmistakable.

  41. that's appropriately-sized? Wrong.... by blanks · · Score: 0, Redundant

    For this star destroyer (I DEVASTATOR) to be "appropriately sized" it would be allmost a city block, maybe 2.

    1. Re:that's appropriately-sized? Wrong.... by C0vardeAn0nim0 · · Score: 1

      considering that a "star destroyer", actually Imperator-class Star Destroyer, is 1,600 metres long (1 mile) and an average human is 1.7 metres long, to acomodate 4" tall figures (aprox 10 cm or 0.1 m) and keep the scale right the model would be 94 m long.

      --
      What ? Me, worry ?
  42. Re:Think that is weird by evanbd · · Score: 1

    If you read the auction, he's also offering 40 hours of skilled labor for $354. Now that's rather cheap, if you ask me.

  43. How to build your own Star Destroyer by tekrat · · Score: 4, Funny

    Step 1) Get Yourself and 25,000 metric tons of steel into space.

    Step 2) Start Welding.

    Step 3) ??????

    Step 4) PROFIT!

    --
    If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
    1. Re:How to build your own Star Destroyer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Step 3) eBay

    2. Re:How to build your own Star Destroyer by CaptnMArk · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think you underestimate the amount of steel by a factor of 100 or more.

    3. Re:How to build your own Star Destroyer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I think you underestimate the true power of the Dark Side of the Force.

    4. Re:How to build your own Star Destroyer by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Nah, sounds like a job for a lot of duct tape. Sometimes confused with the Force because...

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    5. Re:How to build your own Star Destroyer by mbrewthx · · Score: 0

      It would be alot easier with the use of Transpatent Alluminun.... Computer..Computer.... Ah a keyboard how quaint....

      --
      __________ Leave me alone I'm compiling a RPG II program on my S/36...Thanks to metamucil I'm a Regular Meta Moderator
    6. Re:How to build your own Star Destroyer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have altered your specifications, pray I don't alter them further.

  44. Hey now!! by BubbaTheBarbarian · · Score: 2, Funny

    Red - "I found your doll, dumbass."
    Eric - "It's an ACTION FIGURE! "

  45. Lucas knows about this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Oh man I can just imagine Lucas calling his lawyers up and ready to sue!

  46. This one has a PC inside it! by OneArmedMan · · Score: 3, Interesting

    if you click on this link you will find one that has a computer inside it.!

  47. One word: Bandwidth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Hmmm... Build destroyer. Post webpage. Get slashdotted. Get bandwidth bill. Faint.

    OR

    Build destroyer. Place on eBay. Get slashdotted/Cancel auction. Smirk.

  48. Re:umm..what's he big deal?-Snap, crackle, and...o by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if the future must be ships like princess amidalas naboo fighter then please shoot me now. i like the detailed and dirty ships.

  49. Re:umm..what's he big deal?-Snap, crackle, and...o by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Yeah and they slow down the ship in space due to drag too!

    Get a life..

  50. Re:umm..what's he big deal?-Snap, crackle, and...o by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They'd certainly add drag during re-entry.

  51. Re:Umm.. What's the big deal? by zokrath · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You and your replies seem to be missing the point that it is not a model; it is a playset designed for small children like the one in the photograph. He also says that it is quite sturdy, and designed to not have small piece come off during use.

    It is a labor of love that a caring father created for his children, not to impress the denizens of slashdot. I strongly doubt he had anything to do with this getting posted on the front page, and seeing as how he isn't willing to ship it he doesn't benefit much from it.

    I think for an object made largely from wood and decals it looks quite good, and most eight year olds would be thrilled with it, not to mention the envy of their friends. Just because it isn't covered in molded plastic doesn't make it less impressive.

    For someone who still plays with toys, you are rather crtical of how someone else spends their time. Don't take that the wrong way; I paint and convert tabletop figures all the time; I just don't project arbitrary standards inappropriately over the internet.

  52. Re:umm..what's he big deal?-Snap, crackle, and...o by Johnathon_Dough · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Ah, but I come from the other side, I like to see my Sci-Fi ships in no way aerodynamic...unless of course they are used in atmosphere.

    The only reason for aerodynamics is of course, for air to flow cleanly over the surface. In Vacuum, no flowing of air.

    So if you have some sort of hypothetical shielding, it really would not matter too much if you had the eiffel tower sticking out of the top of your space ship. As long as it is braced well enough to handle all the g-force of acceleration and turning.

    --
    If you are one in a million, then there are six thousand people who are just like you.
  53. The pain of Window's shopping. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Window shopping is cool."

    WinXP or Foghorn...er, Longhorn?

  54. Build Your Own Imperial Star Destroyer by slittle · · Score: 5, Funny

    # BUGBUG: put ingress filtering on this vent.
    # someone might want to... I dunno... shoot a
    # torpedo down there or something.

    --
    Opportunity knocks. Karma hunts you down.
    1. Re:Build Your Own Imperial Star Destroyer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Star Destroyer != Death Star

      Love,
      Sense of Humour != me

  55. Doesn't work for me either by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    1. In Soviet Russia, a Beowulf cluster of Nathalie Portman's hot grits immagines you, you insensitive clod.
    2. ebay
    3. Profit!!

    Ummm... doesn't work for me. But nethertheless, I for one welcome our new ebay overlords.

  56. Yes, but does it really fly? by agw · · Score: 1

    I'll be impressed if anyone manages a flying model start destoyer. I mean, it doesn't have to hover or anything, just fly like any other model plane.

    1. Re:Yes, but does it really fly? by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      It has no wings, and it is a delta shape - delta wings are aerodynamically unstable.

      It would be very difficult to keep it true to the real shape of the movie ship and also make it fly.

    2. Re:Yes, but does it really fly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Fill it with helium?

      Sure, you'd have to build it really light, but it could be done.

      Brute force could work also.

  57. How to build a -real- star destroyer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I was always wondering - how is an organisation going to build something as big as a star destroyer or even death star?
    Even if you have massive amounts of slave labour and hordes of droids you still have to get all the material together. And the droids need energy and the slaves need to be fed (sometimes).
    And all the management, for which you need highly trained Sith supervisors and engineers!

    1. Re:How to build a -real- star destroyer? by Kredal · · Score: 3, Funny

      And don't forget all the contract labor that has to put financial interests before their own safety, who, as it turns out, made the wrong choice and became victims of a war they had no part in.

      --
      Whoever stated that signature sizes should be limited to one hundred and twenty characters can just go ahead and kiss my
    2. Re:How to build a -real- star destroyer? by CrazyTalk · · Score: 1

      Easy - just have the threat of a visit from the Emperor, and your construction crew will "double their efforts"

    3. Re:How to build a -real- star destroyer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, you can't have stormtroopers runnin' a toilet main. All they know is killing and white uniforms...

    4. Re:How to build a -real- star destroyer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps they've found new ways to motivate them.

  58. Re:umm..what's he big deal?-Snap, crackle, and...o by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Ever seen a real spacecraft? Looks like a 5yo went nuts with the tin foil and kitchen utencils.

    Spacecraft will probbaly always tend towards the "junk box" style because it's cheap and easy to engineer.
    When they start making spacecraft for consumers, then there will probably be more sleeker looking spacecraft. And they won't all be silver or grey either! ;)

  59. Lesser of two geeks by t_allardyce · · Score: 3, Funny

    Whats worse - buying this, or not buying it because its techically the wrong size?

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  60. Re:Come on! - Watch my movie! by Cirrocco · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Okay, if this guy can have his Ebay auction listed on /. then I can pimp my fan film.

    The Ten Dollar Star Wars Fan Film

    Yeah, it's huge and it's great quality. Suitable for VCD as the filename implies. Besides, I don't want to go through my entire life without having been /.'d at least once!

    What's the movie about? We made a bet...a bad bet. We bet that we could make a Star Wars fan film for under $10. Watch the hilarious hi-jinks unfold as we do anything to get the shot! You won't believe the ending! With music from Alice in Chains, Iggy Pop, Jane's Addiction and more!

    Includes trailer for possible upcoming project.

    Download and enjoy! Burn it to VCD and give it to friends! Give it to enemies! Put it on Bit Torrent sites! And meet the stars at Wondercon at Moscone Center in San Francisco at the East Bay Star Wars Fan Club booth April 30-May 2.

  61. Re:Umm.. What's the big deal? by luna69 · · Score: 1

    > and designed to not have small piece come
    > off during use.

    and LARGE pieces?

    --
    No gods, no demons, and no masters. Secular Humanism!
  62. That's no five year-old by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's a space station!

  63. While that's a rather cool case... by Rebel_Princess · · Score: 0, Troll
  64. But... by Snaller · · Score: 1

    ... can it fly?

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    1. Re:But... by WinDoze · · Score: 1

      Yes, but only once (when you throw it off the roof).

    2. Re:But... by Snaller · · Score: 1

      Oh well :)

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  65. Re:Agreed!! Mod Parent UP by halivar · · Score: 1

    Where are the plans???

    Wouldn't that phrase be more appropriate if the article were titled, "Build Your Own Death Star?"

    Ok... time for me to go home to my... nobody.

  66. About the photos ... by hotspotbloc · · Score: 1
    Is that Yoda in the picture?

    "Homely that child is".

    --
    "I hate to advocate drugs, alcohol, violence or insanity but they've always worked for me" - HST
    1. Re:About the photos ... by LurkerXXX · · Score: 1

      hmm, I've got mod points today, but there's no '-1 cruel' modifier...

  67. Finally by TrondS · · Score: 2, Funny

    He's getting the money to move out of his mother's basement

  68. Re:Come on! - Watch my movie! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Watch the hilarious hi-jinks unfold as we do anything to get the shot! You won't believe the ending! With music from Alice in Chains, Iggy Pop, Jane's Addiction and more!

    Dude - I watched the first 2 minutes of that. It isn't good. I don't have a clue what it's about besides two dude dressed like ewoks chatting about what-the-hell. I can't even understand the guy on the right.

  69. That's Cool But... by Dolentron+3030 · · Score: 2, Funny

    A Star Destroyer made for 4" action figures? How bout one made for 4' actual people. I won't be interested in buying one until I can sit my own hyperbolic chamber and mentally kill people.

  70. Its the little things by sizzzzlerz · · Score: 1, Funny

    At least the picture does't show the builder in a spandex body suit.

  71. Babe Magnet? by Cnik70 · · Score: 1

    Wow, what a babe magnet. I can just picture the women asking this guy if they can come over and see his Imperial Star Destroyer.....

    um....yeah....

    --
    -Cnik
    1. Re:Babe Magnet? by f0rt0r · · Score: 1

      At least she won't be complaining about the size!

      --
      I can't afford a sig!
  72. Re:Come on! - Watch my movie! by DarthTaco · · Score: 1

    'With music from Alice in Chains, Iggy Pop, Jane's Addiction and more!'

    I don't know if you are serious or not about the music, but if you are, you are going to have to pay some serious royalty fees.

  73. Re:umm..what's he big deal?-Snap, crackle, and...o by DarthTaco · · Score: 1

    "Ah, but I come from the other side, I like to see my Sci-Fi ships in no way aerodynamic...unless of course they are used in atmosphere."

    On the other hand, a triangle is a very structurally sound shape. And weightless doesn't mean zero inertia. It seems to me that wedges make a lot of sense for super massive space vehicles that have high magnitude forces unevenly applied.

    Then again I really don't know much about physics, so that could be way off base.

  74. If you only.. by OneArmedMan · · Score: 2, Funny

    .. knew the power of the /dark side/ of the force!

  75. This is not to scale with 4" figs! by LRJ · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I don't have the link, but somebody did have a Rebel Blockade runner on ebay that was built to scale (for the 4" figs) and it had to pulled around on a 35' tractor trailer - an Imperial Cruiser is over 10X larger than a Blockade Runner (150 meters long vs 1600 meters long) so this isn't even close.

    --
    LRJ
  76. Re:umm..what's he big deal?-Snap, crackle, and...o by NormalVisual · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The first Star Destroyer model (Devastator) was about three feet in length. The second one (Avenger) built for "Empire" was about eight feet and *much* more detailed, and the Super Star Destroyer (Executor) for the same movie was about ten feet. Some really good photos of the Avenger studio model are available here, and show the sheer amount of effort that ILM put into building these behemoths. Of course, there are lots of other photos of all the studio models available elsewhere online.

    Gads, I gotta get a life....

    --
    Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
  77. Re:umm..what's he big deal?-Snap, crackle, and...o by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >wedges make a lot of sense for super massive space vehicles

    Mmm...Space Wedgies.

  78. A link that won't get the Slashdot affect! by cjmnews · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's about time we get a link posted here that you can visit without being the first 5 people to see the post.

    --
    You can lose something that is loose, so tighten the loose item so you don't lose it.
  79. It did... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...but there was a "jamming" incident.

  80. I wanted a full scale model anyway by earthforce_1 · · Score: 1


    Now that would be awesome!

    --
    My rights don't need management.
  81. Re:umm..what's he big deal?-Snap, crackle, and...o by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you want a *REALLY* funny example of greebling, check out starcrash. They stuck everything on their ships, from hair brushes to spray paint cans.

  82. a little out of scale by pablo_max · · Score: 1

    Not to say its not cool (see not cool) or anything, but it's just a little out of scale. I mean the little figures are as tall as the engines. Plus its made of plywood.

  83. My God! by dacarr · · Score: 1

    He's selling this for GBP 250! What is his major malfunction!

    --
    This sig no verb.
  84. Pfft $10, try 0$ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've made a starwars AND Planet of the Apes fan film all rolled into one for 0$ as long as you don't include the sixty of Canadian Club we drank while it was in production...

    I don't have a link because with a $0 budget we coudn't afford to host it anywhere... you could try some P2P networks though. Search for "Enter The Ape"

    1. Re:Pfft $10, try 0$ by Cirrocco · · Score: 1

      Enter the Ape, eh? Alright, I'll see if I can find it.

      Now, just to be clear: we actually made it for more like $100. The DV tapes are about $7 a pop by themselves. The ten dollar bet didn't actually happen, it was more or less just a premise to goof around with obviously bad props a'la MST3K.

      "If you're wondering how he eats and breathes and other science facts
      (la la la)
      then repeat to yourself it's just a show, I should really just relax
      For Mystery Science Theater 3000.....twang!

      Anywho...to the other guy who didn't like the opening two minutes, well...I guess you'd have to know your ViewAskewniverse pretty well to get the joke. I guess you don't.

      By the way, if you've got a copy and your financial situation has changed see if you can get it hosted. Maybe TF.N will host it for you, no cost. I'd love to see it if I can't find it elsewhere.

  85. Re:delta wings are aerodynamically unstable? by zmollusc · · Score: 1

    since when?

    --
    They whose government reduces their essential liberties for temporary security, receive neither liberty nor security.
  86. Nurnies and Greebles? by Threed · · Score: 1

    Ok, I took the bait and googled, and when I found out what they were for some reason I laughed my ass off. Maybe it's the silly name, maybe it's the recognition that yes, these things are necessary, but it totally ticked my funny bone. Thank you!

  87. Not to scaleeee!!!!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OMIGOD this model is not to scale I don't think anybody knew that so I will post it now DON'T BUY NOT TO SCALE it would have to be six miles long and made of solid gold to be worth anything NOT TO SCALE it's not long enough omigod!

  88. Re:umm..what's he big deal?-Snap, crackle, and...o by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The reason for the wedge-shape of the Star Destroyer was to allow every gon on the ship (almost) to fire on one spot.

  89. The specs of the real thing by 64Bit · · Score: 1

    Imperial-I class Star Destroyer built at the Kuat Drive Yards, this heavy-duty Imperial capital ship is the version used in the Emperor Palpatine's Navy. The wedge-shaped Imperial-I class Star Destroyer measured 1,600 meters in length, and was manned by 36,810 crewers and 275 gunners. It could also transport up to 1,200 troops. Jedi Search quotes the Imperial-I class is manned by 37,000 crewers and can carry 9,700 troops. Its top sublight speed is 60 MGLT, and its hull has been rated at 150 RU. Despite its formidable appearance, Talon Karrde once stated that the Imperial-class had 174,000 design flaws waiting to be exploited. It boasts the following shipboard systems: * 2 Om-Thaim Broadcast Banner Shield Generator (the round towers on top) rted at 300 SBD * 60 Borstel NK-7 Ion Cannon Batteries * 10 Phylon-Q7 Tractor Beam Projectors * a Seinar Fleet Systems I-a2b Solar Ionization Reactor and Stardrive * 60 Taim and Bak XX9 Heavy Turbolaser Batteries * LeGrange Targetting Computers * Seinar Fleet Systems S-s3a Long Range Tachyon Detection Scanner * Planetary Assault Units o 12 Landing Barges o 20 AT-Ats o 30 AT-STs * 6 Fighter Bays o 3 TIE Fighter Squadrons o 2 TIE Interceptor Squadrons o 1 TIE Bomber Squadron * 28 Landing Bays o 5 Assault Gunboats o 8 Lambda-class Shuttles o 15 Stormtrooper Transports
    Copyright Bob Vitas Author of the Completely Unofficial Star Wars Encylcopedia
    Now I don't know about you but that seams like a helluva lot to fit into 2-3 meters... at scale... out of wood... but that's just my opinion.

  90. Hypebolic Chamber??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is this where you sit and plot complex equations for the Empire? Oooohhh...Eeeeevil.

  91. Where are the engines? by gcalvin · · Score: 1

    There are huge exhaust ports for what looks like three main engines and four auxiliary/steering engines, but they're all just stuck on the stern bulkhead. Where are the actual engines? Wouldn't you expect at least the mains to run about half the length of the ship?

  92. Here's how it went down... by dy_dx · · Score: 1

    In mid-auction, Paul Allen or Bill Gates or some such divinely wealthy techie contacted him with an offer beyond his wildest expectations and certainly beyond the 250GBP highest bid (say $75K). Thus, he made an agreement with his new patron to withdraw the auction and avoid a silly and public price-raising war loaded with fake bids. Now, said techie is giddily planning his trip by private jet to pick up the toy of a lifetime, while simultaneously calling architect/contractors to add a room onto his estate worthy of this thing (maybe next to the DaVinci notebook? =) Meanwhile, some assistant of the rich guy is buying up old Tie Fighters and action figures left and right so that he and his kids can spend hours giddily re-enacting the movies.

    Can't believe that a rich guy would do this? Re-watch The Toy. ;-)

    I, for one, just want to see those 100 progress pictures--I mean show me the Millenium Falcon on the landing ramp. If you're out there Mr. Rich Guy who bought this, please anonymously post the pictures for us to salivate over in envy!

    (Note to owner: I would trade you a decent collection of c. 1970 ships just for the chance to see this thing).

  93. Build a better one from Lego! by trueger · · Score: 1

    It's not a *bad* likeness, but Lego has
    done a much better job.

    It's not cheap (Lego never is), but it's such a
    great set of parts I'm considering getting
    a second one.

    Also, the set's been out for a while, so it's
    due for retirement. Get it soon.

    --
    Quoth the Moose: Any job worth doing is worth complaining about.
  94. It says in the text of the auction by Transient0 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    that the model is not in scale with 4 inch toys. It is in scale (of some undisclosed ratio) with the on-screen version as far as external construction goes. The inside has been redesigned to be appropriate for use with the 4 inch toys, but a look at the picture will show how out of scale it is. Clearly an ISD has more than six or seven rooms.

    As he says, a toy that was properly in scale to 4 inch toys would be the length of his street. Really, what the guy has done is the perfect compromise between accuracy to the movie and functionality as a toy. i applaud him.

  95. Re:But... It's not a scale model! by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 2, Informative
    Actually, you are completely right, and I had actually wanted to add that to the end of my initial post but forgot.

    I was just looking at this thinking....there weren't a handful of rooms on these suckers, they were HUGE! They had huge launchbays that could hold shuttles and squads of tie fighters.

    --
    Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  96. Re:umm..what's he big deal?-Snap, crackle, and...o by Peter+La+Casse · · Score: 1

    That seems like a pretty good reason for a wedge-shaped ship to me.

  97. Re:Come on! - Watch my movie! by Cirrocco · · Score: 1

    Well, yeah, I would if I was making a damn dime off of it myself. They could sue me and get the $1.50 I have in my bank account I suppose.

    That ten dollars wiped me out! Brother, can you spare a dime?

  98. Re:Come on! - Watch my movie! by Weissmohr · · Score: 1

    For what it's worth, I have actually seen Clerks numerous times, so I understood what that scene is about.

    Here's a tip:
    In Clerks, the same scene happens, but instead of discussing the movie Mallrats, they're discussing Star Wars, specifically the destruction of the second, not-yet-supposed-to-be-operational (big clue on that one) Death Star.
    (The thing one of the clerks has been wondering about is of course that if it's being constructed you would have all these innocent construction workers getting killed when the Rebels blow it up)

    In this scene, two guys from the Star Wars universe discuss Clerks and Mallrats.
    I for one thought that was hilarious, so will check out more of this movie.

  99. Pissed by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    There is no restroom! Where the hell do they take a dump?

  100. Star Destroyer I Devastator by Darthscooby1001 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I would like to take this opportunity to thank you all for your kind words regarding my Star Destroyer. A subscriber was kind enough to send me the link to this site, which I had no idea existed never mind was discussing my ship. It did indeed take 3 years to build but only with a week here and a few days there. When I started I had no idea what I was going and no prior woodwork skills. I simply wanted to make the ship I yearned for when I was a child and looked at it how I believe a child would. As some of you have noticed I have ended the listing and have sold the ship privately. It has gone to a good home and I can rest assured it will be played with as a toy is meant to be. I would certainly not say a profit was made, apart from the many hours of labour, wood is not cheap to buy. I also gave the buyer many figures and ships to man the vessel with. During the last week or two I have been inundated with emails from Star Wars fans telling me of their admiration for the creation, I am just astounded. I did not expect in a millennia anything like the response I have received. I am not a carpenter or artist by trade, but a simple soldier in the British Army. I am posted very shortly to Germany and really do need to cut down some of my Star Wars possessions. My response to the critics is I have made something that has put a smile on a child's face - what have you done? For the rest of you, hang around another year or three because your inspiration has me planning my next project - A 4 inch scale Deathstar! That is scale so the figures fit in it, not 80 miles in diameter. DarthScooby1001

    1. Re:Star Destroyer I Devastator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A 4 inch scale Deathstar

      That's no moon.

  101. Re:delta wings are aerodynamically unstable? by jo_ham · · Score: 1

    Since always.

    The greater the sweep of a wing, the less compressible drag it creates.

    A high level of sweep is used in fighters and high speed aircraft because of this - however, it makes the plane somewhat unstable at low speeds thus making take off and landing difficult (you must do both at higher speeds).

    A delta wing is essentially a big triangle - like very swept back wings, so it performs very similarly to swept wings.

    Great for high speed flight, but very poor at lower speeds - a model aircraft would suffer since the speeds necessary to develop lift would be higher than a normal model plane.

  102. Re:umm..what's he big deal?-Snap, crackle, and...o by codecasting · · Score: 1

    During preproduction for Star Wars, the original ship designs were sleek and shiny. Unfortunately, at the scale they were built, they had a tendancy to reflect the camera and crew back into the image. Thus the discolored sheetmetal with doodads tacked on. Only with the advent of computer rendering do you begin to see polished surfaces on spacecraft more often...

  103. Re:Come on! - Watch my movie! by operagost · · Score: 1

    Boy howdy, whenever I think of Star Wars music, Iggy Pop is the first thing in my head!

    --

    Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  104. Re:umm..what's he big deal?-Snap, crackle, and...o by Saeger · · Score: 1
    I did not know that

    --

    --
    Power to the Peaceful
  105. Re:Umm.. What's the big deal? by JudgeFurious · · Score: 1

    I couldn't agree more. Not only that I thought the style he did it in matched the simplified style of many of the toys very well. Sure you've got your highly detailed toys that make sounds and junks like that but I remember how oddly proportioned my first X-Wing fighter toy was (back in the late 70's when those toys first appeared) and this matches it very nicely IMO.

    --
    Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
  106. A thought... by adius · · Score: 1

    I admit, this is really cool stuff. But, am I the only one thinking this guy has spent way too much time playing with dolls?

  107. Re:Come on! - Watch my movie! by MegaFur · · Score: 1

    You got your wish. I can't get the film, nor access your webserver. I'm thinkin' you're slashdotted.

    --
    Furry cows moo and decompress.
  108. re: the department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    'wookiee' is spelled with two e's you insensitive clod!

  109. what is this!? by popo · · Score: 1


    A star destroyer for ants?

    For people to fit inside it needs to be at least... 3 times as big.

    --
    ------ The best brain training is now totally free : )
  110. So is everything else anywhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everything anyone mentions anywhere is an ad for something

  111. No, no, no!!! by fishexe · · Score: 1

    To put it in classic Slashdot form:
    1)Waste hours of life building scale star-destroyer model.
    2)Post star-destroyer for sale on ebay.
    3)Post story on /. with link to auction
    4)PROFIT!!!!


    You forgot the ...!

    --
    "I don't care about the Constitution!" --Bill O'Reilly, November 17, 2009
  112. What's wrong with you kids these days?! by fishexe · · Score: 1

    I was a kid not too long ago, and I wouldn't really wanna play with some big balsa wood, grey-pained thing.

    Why, in my day, we would've killed to get ahold of big, balsa wood, grey-painted things!

    --
    "I don't care about the Constitution!" --Bill O'Reilly, November 17, 2009
  113. Re:delta wing ..... similarly to swept wings by zmollusc · · Score: 1

    No they don't. not at low speed. Compare a b47 with a vulcan or croncord.

    --
    They whose government reduces their essential liberties for temporary security, receive neither liberty nor security.
  114. Re:Come on! Welcome it. by saskboy · · Score: 1

    I for one welcome our Imperial eBay overlords... as you can see from my signature.

    Recently though, the Imperial eBay overlords have been pissing me off. They've restricted posting on the eBay Boards to just 10 posts per day for people with less than 10 unique positive feedback for a score. They plan on ruining the other international eBay Boards like ebay.ca soon too. http://forums.ebay.ca

    --
    Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
  115. Boys playing with dolls... by orn · · Score: 1

    nice doll house. :-)

    --
    1. 2.