Slashdot Mirror


SuSE 9.1 Available for Download

Aiua writes "Novell and SuSE AG have made the Live Evaluation CD of SuSE Linux 9.1 available for download. A list of mirrors carrying the 680MB ISO image is available on the SuSE Website. The Live CD allows you to test some of the new features of 9.1 without installation, and is a SuSE recommended download to test your computer for distribution compatability. The full Personal and Professional Editions are now shipping and available for purchase in the SuSE Store or your local reseller." Reader Sweetshark points out that the first release of the Live CD has problems, so make sure you get the most recent one: "SUSE Security Announcement: Live CD 9.1 (SuSE-SA:2004:011) describes a big security hole in the SuSE 9.1 Personal Edition Live CD: 'Upon boot, the Live CD will automatically configure a network card if one has been detected. [...] A configuration error on the Live CD allows for a passwordless, remote root login to the system via ssh, if the computer has booted from the Live CD and if it is connected to a network.' A fixed iso is available."

229 comments

  1. I'll wait a week. by Lord+Kano · · Score: 0, Insightful

    The torrents will be slow as hell today.

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    1. Re:I'll wait a week. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'll wait a week too. Nothing to do with SUSE or downloading, I'm just installing Gentoo.

    2. Re:I'll wait a week. by TheBadger · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      We just need someone to post a link to the .torrent file hint hint ;-)

    3. Re:I'll wait a week. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      WHAT?
      you want a lot of people downloading a torrent.

    4. Re:I'll wait a week. by Requiem · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yeah, that should take about a week.

    5. Re:I'll wait a week. by flatface · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Nosir. You want a better seed to peer ratio. And a slashdotting won't do that.

    6. Re:I'll wait a week. by dJCL · · Score: 1

      I just dug around the mirrors list, FTP from the Indiana state site are giving me about 1.15M/s on my work link.

      --
      On Arrakis: early worm gets the bird. Magister mundi sum!
    7. Re:I'll wait a week. by Lord+Kano · · Score: 2, Funny

      I just dug around the mirrors list, FTP from the Indiana state site are giving me about 1.15M/s on my work link.

      Wait 20 minutes and check it again, you just told all of /. about it.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    8. Re:I'll wait a week. by dJCL · · Score: 1

      That's fine, It took 13 minutes to download...

      --
      On Arrakis: early worm gets the bird. Magister mundi sum!
    9. Re:I'll wait a week. by crawling_chaos · · Score: 4, Funny

      Optimist.

      --
      You can only drink 30 or 40 glasses of beer a day, no matter how rich you are.
      -- Colonel Adolphus Busch
    10. Re:I'll wait a week. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WTF???

      That clever joke you just made, "Yeah, that should take about a week" - that was the joke that parent post was making. Jeez, you total twat.

    11. Re:I'll wait a week. by dedeman · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I got about 360k on my cable. The only problem is that GA Tech still has the original 9.1, with security flaw (I think). I couldn't find anything that said 9.1.1. I dont' know if this is the same for all the mirrors.

  2. FTP Install by Gilesx · · Score: 1

    Does the live CD allow you to automatically do a Hard drive FTP Install, or do you have to pony up for that?

    --
    Sunday you're Thinking Different, Monday you're a huge tool, paying too much and waiting to think like everyone else.
    1. Re:FTP Install by thryllkill · · Score: 3, Informative

      no the live CD has been available for days now... the FTP install has not been updated yet...

      I've been waiting... can ya tell?

      --

      Note to self: No more arguing with the faithful.

    2. Re:FTP Install by King_of_Crunk · · Score: 5, Informative

      Well you going to have to wait a bit longer...
      From the readme.txt on the suse ftp site:

      Wed May 5 12:50:00 MEST 2004 - draht@

      This tree contains the source RPM packages for the SUSE LINUX 9.1
      distribution. The SUSE LINUX 9.1 ftp version will be published on June 4th
      in this directory.

      Thanks,
      Roman Drahtmüller,
      Sebastian Nagel,
      ftpadmin@suse.com

    3. Re:FTP Install by thryllkill · · Score: 1

      wow... it used to say, "in a few days."

      --

      Note to self: No more arguing with the faithful.

    4. Re:FTP Install by jonathanduty · · Score: 1

      I'm curious, how can they release a linux distro like this, without offering a free version for download? Seems to me they would have to release both the in-box version and the free version at the same time or they would be in violation.

    5. Re:FTP Install by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      The GPL ensures Open Source not FREE source. If they distribute GPL programs they must provide scource code to those they have DISTRIBUTED to not anyone. If you have not bought the retail 9.1 you are not entitled to their scource code as they haven't distributed anything to you. I don't think they technically every have to provide a free download. Why complain that they give paying customers a month head start?

    6. Re:FTP Install by Unoriginal+Nick · · Score: 1

      No, there's nothing that says they have to provide a free version at all; they just need to provide the sources with whatever versions they do offer. Since the boxed version comes with the sources, there's no problem.

    7. Re:FTP Install by ocelotbob · · Score: 3, Informative
      They just have to provide the source to the people who get the binaries. Legally, they don't have to give a copy of the source to anyone else, not even the developers. I've bought GPLed software before; a tweaked version of GCC from Cygnus back when nicities such as the EGCS branch and the graphical debugger weren't in regular gcc, and I only got the source on the CD, it wasn't on their website at all.

      Someone should link the gpl here; I'm too lazy and need to take a shower and head out for debauchery and stuff. But the relevant verbage is in there. The only reasons Linux companies provide the source to the General Public is because it's good Karma.

      --

      Marxism is the opiate of dumbasses

    8. Re:FTP Install by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      June 8th is when the ftp install will be allowed.. Suse releases a distro then a month later allows people to do net isntall.

    9. Re:FTP Install by jonathanduty · · Score: 1

      Oh I'm not compalaining. I'll still go buy the CDs just to support them. Not being a laywer I was just curious. $40 is a great price for a stable OS (considering the alternative).

    10. Re:FTP Install by kotj.mf · · Score: 1

      No, they just have to make the source available to you if you ask them. Plus, they can deliver it to you any way they want: teletype, microfiche, or Morse Code.

      --
      hang brain.
    11. Re:FTP Install by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By alternative, do you mean $0 for a stable OS?

    12. Re:FTP Install by Fouquet · · Score: 1

      Regardless, they are providing the sources on the ftp site, and have been for several days now.

      ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/suse/i386/9.1/suse/src/

    13. Re:FTP Install by irix · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, they just have to make the source available to you if you ask them.

      No, they have to give you then source when they give you the binaries or make it available to any third party upon request, although they can change for media distribution.

      Plus, they can deliver it to you any way they want: teletype, microfiche, or Morse Code.

      Incorrect - it has to be on a "on a medium customarily used for software interchange" to comply with the GPL. I don't think any of those would qualify.

      --

      Do you even know anything about perl? -- AC Replying to Tom Christiansen post.
    14. Re:FTP Install by j-pimp · · Score: 1

      By $0 for a stable OS, do you mean downloading Solaris x86?

      --
      --- Justin Dearing http://www.justaprogrammer.net/ We're just programmers.
    15. Re:FTP Install by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 1

      Plus, they can deliver it to you any way they want: teletype, microfiche, or Morse Code.

      No, it has to be machine-readable.

      --

      I write in my journal
    16. Re:FTP Install by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Just download the full 9.1 installer DVD from alt.binaries.cd.image.linux on usenet. It's been in there for 2 weeks. If you are DVD-less, you can pull the appropriate files onto CD's by mounting the DVD .iso file.

    17. Re:FTP Install by paranode · · Score: 1

      You have to wait until June 4th for that. The sources are already on the mirrors but that doesn't do most people much good.

    18. Re:FTP Install by King_of_Crunk · · Score: 1

      Well the source RPM's have been available for like the past two weeks via FTP to the public. SO as far as fulfilling the obligatioin to offer the source they have been even before the actual binary distribution was even released.

    19. Re:FTP Install by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pay the price, its worth it.... I got it on time

  3. Dear SUSE by Letter · · Score: 0, Redundant
    Dear SUSE,

    "A configuration error on the Live CD allows for a passwordless, remote root login to the system via ssh"

    THAT'S NOT GOOD ;)

    Letter

    1. Re:Dear SUSE by thryllkill · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      yeah... cause I, like a lot of Sysadmins, use live CDs for my fucking enterprise server at work. My boss has no clue this shit is in a RAMdrive...

      grow the fuck up... this vulnarability affects about three people with nothing to steal.

      I'd be pissed if someone broke into my RAMdrive.

      --

      Note to self: No more arguing with the faithful.

    2. Re:Dear SUSE by aacool · · Score: 3, Interesting
      If Microsoft did that, Slashdotters would be all over them. funny how things change based on which side of the fence one is.

      This is not a troll- just an opinion. It is definitely a big gap, and good that it was identified early - possibly earlier than it might have been were it in the closed-source world?

    3. Re:Dear SUSE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If Microsoft did what? Released a Live CD of XP with a fully functional office suite free along with a bunch of games and other doo-dads.

      Hell yeah you can bet we'd be all over them for it. Cause it would be amazing.

      If it had a security hole in it too? There would be jokes about it but no one would be too serious BECAUSE IT'S A LIVE CD installed on a RAMdrive.

      How you got modded interesting is beyond me.

    4. Re:Dear SUSE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Possibly because he did under his own id, not as an anoncoward, like I am

    5. Re:Dear SUSE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I karmawhored enough this week. Time to give AC some of the flame powa!

    6. Re:Dear SUSE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is not a troll- just an opinion.

      No, it's redundant. See the replies to the other post which stated the same thing for the counterarguments against this opinion.

    7. Re:Dear SUSE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If Microsoft did that, Slashdotters would be all over them. funny how things change based on which side of the fence one is.

      Oh brother, this again. C'mon, have the guts to actually say "SuSE did something wrong" yourself instead of immediately attacking the (hypothetical!) opinion of SlashDot. Ignoring the meat of the argument and going right into the flaming really does make you look like a troll.

    8. Re:Dear SUSE by glsunder · · Score: 1

      "If it had a security hole in it too? There would be jokes about it but no one would be too serious BECAUSE IT'S A LIVE CD installed on a RAMdrive."

      If the system has no HD, then it's no big deal. But, if you can mount the local drives that could pose a problem.

  4. Still no full install ISOs.... by gumpish · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I've always been annoyed by the fact that SuSE has never made regular full-install ISOs available.

    Blah blah ftp install blah blah... I've heard it before.

    1. Re:Still no full install ISOs.... by Daemonik · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Blah blah SuSE blah no free ISO's blah blah I'm a spoiled child crying because I'm not getting my way blah blah

      Gee, talk about hearing it all before.

    2. Re:Still no full install ISOs.... by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1
      I've always been annoyed by the fact that SuSE has never made regular full-install ISOs available.

      The full-install ISOs are available from SuSE; they just happen to be pressed onto CDs.

    3. Re:Still no full install ISOs.... by shawn(at)fsu · · Score: 1

      Everytime SuSE releases a new version people get on the topic of ISO's. This hasn't been a problem for me as I have never had a problem with and FTP install. The FTP install has the advantage that it doesn't waste bandwidth downloading stuff you don't need.

      If the ISO's still bother you, I'm sure you can find someone somehwhere who has posted them.

      --
      500 dollar reward for tip(s) leading to the arrest of the person(s) who stole my sig.
    4. Re:Still no full install ISOs.... by Donny+Smith · · Score: 1

      >I've always been annoyed by the fact that SuSE has never made regular full-install ISOs available.

      A (stereo)typical injusted Slashdot revolutionary...

      I don't get it how this can be modded as interesting. We hear it every day - Windows security updates should be distributed for free, SuSE should give away ISOs, blah blah blah.

      Get a life, download a copy of Debian and shut up.

    5. Re:Still no full install ISOs.... by gonza · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well just because SuSE doesn't make their ISOs available doesn't stop anyone else from ripping the distro to iso and hosting it. I emailed their info site and asked about the legality, and they said that as long as you're noot seeking monetary gain from providing the isos then you can host them.

      So if you have a few Gigs of free space why not get a copy off ebay for $5 and host them for the rest of us.

    6. Re:Still no full install ISOs.... by Tukla · · Score: 1

      I've always been annoyed by the people with broadband whining about not being able to download SuSE ISOs. Many of us can't download any ISOs. I spent $15 just to try out MEPIS Linux, and I've spent the last week trying to upgrade the system in 50 MB chunks. So don't expect any sympathy from this corner.

    7. Re:Still no full install ISOs.... by Tukla · · Score: 1

      I only have 50 MB of hosting space, but I managed to fit the images in there by running them through a JPEG converter. You guys can thank me later.

  5. Can it fill the gap Mandrake 10 can't? by eyeye · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I was going to install mandrake 10 today but it doesnt appear to support my on board ethernet (nforce2), will suse support it by default?

    Oh hold on this a bloody "live cd" again isnt it - I thought SuSE had stopped being difficult about allowing their distro to be downloaded as CD images.

    --
    Bush and Blair ate my sig!
    1. Re:Can it fill the gap Mandrake 10 can't? by eyeye · · Score: 1

      Before anyone leaps on me, I know you can download the forcedeth drivers but I like my installations to go seamlessly and having network access asap is very important.

      In fact I love Distros that install almost from scratch over the network e.g debian. I carry a debian business card sized CD with me all the time - contains all I need to install it.

      Shit that probably wont work on this new motherboard either! lol.

      --
      Bush and Blair ate my sig!
    2. Re:Can it fill the gap Mandrake 10 can't? by eljasbo · · Score: 3, Informative

      i installed 9.1 last night and the nforce2 net drivers work great. I was also amazed that it picked up my usb flash disk reader without any extra configuration at all. It works like a champ from i can tell so far

    3. Re:Can it fill the gap Mandrake 10 can't? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Mandrake 10.0 kernels (2.6 or 2.4) support nForce ethernet without problems, the driver is called forcedeth. And, oh, it is present in vanilla kernels too.

    4. Re:Can it fill the gap Mandrake 10 can't? by eyeye · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the info, thanks to anonymous coward too for pointing out the drivers are in mandrake 10, I must have been mistaken.

      --
      Bush and Blair ate my sig!
    5. Re:Can it fill the gap Mandrake 10 can't? by pjkundert · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Just a note of caution if you are using the nForce2 motherboards with a 2.6 kernel. I just built up a new webserver/fileserver/wireless access point, using an ASUS A7N8X motherboard and Athlon 2600+, and wanted to run 2.6, reiser4 and software RAID. As soon as I did any disk I/O, it would hang solid.

      Apparently, the 2.6.5 (and perhaps other) kernels trigger a bit of an nForce2 chipset problem; I needed to need to turn of APIC and Local APIC for them to work reliably at their rated speed. Here's how I did it using GRUB (my root partition is a mirrored RAID device). Note the "noapic nolapic" in the kernel specification. Using lilo, you would add an append="noapic nolapic" to your image=... stanza...
      title GNU/Linux 2.6.5 MD+Reiser4+hostap (hd1,0) /dev/hdb
      root (hd1,0)
      kernel /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.5 ro root=/dev/md0 noapic nolapic
      initrd /boot/initrd.img-2.6.5

      title GNU/Linux 2.6.5 MD+Reiser4+hostap (hd2,0) /dev/hdd
      root (hd2,0)
      kernel /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.5 ro root=/dev/md0 noapic nolapic
      initrd /boot/initrd.img-2.6.5

      After this change, it's been running rock solid under heavy use for over a week. I am running Debian; perhaps the SUSE or other distributions have already patched their 2.6.X kernels for this problem, but I doubt it.
      --
      -- -pjk Perry Kundert perry@kundert.ca http://kundert.2y.net
    6. Re:Can it fill the gap Mandrake 10 can't? by blixel · · Score: 1

      Apparently, the 2.6.5 (and perhaps other) kernels trigger a bit of an nForce2 chipset problem; I needed to need to turn of APIC and Local APIC for them to work reliably at their rated speed.

      By reliably, do you mean "for them to work at all"? Of the distro I've installed on this machine (as well as FreeBSD), I can't get it to even install unless I specify "noapic nolapic". There's also a "noioapic" option, but I don't appear to need that.

      Once it's installed, I leave "noapic nolapic" in my lilo.conf or else my system will hard lock after 5 or 10 minutes. (Took me quite a while to figure out what was causing the hard lock. But now it's perfectly stable. But I wonder, what am I "missing" with APIC shut off?)

    7. Re:Can it fill the gap Mandrake 10 can't? by blixel · · Score: 1

      Mandrake 10.0 kernels (2.6 or 2.4) support nForce ethernet without problems, the driver is called forcedeth. And, oh, it is present in vanilla kernels too.

      I wasn't the original poster on this - but I'll reply anyway.

      That is interesting about the forcedeth module. I didn't even know it existed until you posted this. (In the past, I had downloaded the nForce drivers from NVidia to get my second NIC working.)

      I wonder why MDK 10.0 only shows me my onboard 3com card by default? I assume I can probably add forcedeth to my /etc/modprobe.conf file - but I didn't have to do that for my 3com card.

    8. Re:Can it fill the gap Mandrake 10 can't? by The+Bungi · · Score: 1

      Let me email Aunt Tillie and tell her about this. I think she was seeing the same problem. So she should just noapicate GRUB, right? OK. Thanks.

    9. Re:Can it fill the gap Mandrake 10 can't? by Satan's+Hand+Puppet · · Score: 1

      It does even better than just supporting nforce2. It provides the GPL drivers for your card, "forcedeth" automatically.

    10. Re:Can it fill the gap Mandrake 10 can't? by Hooded+One · · Score: 1

      I've never been able to get the nVidia ethernet to work properly with forcedeth, neither on Mandrake nor SuSE. Then again, I haven't really bothered much since the 3Com ethernet has always worked just fine.

    11. Re:Can it fill the gap Mandrake 10 can't? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you also should disable "Cpu Disconnect" feature in BIOS settings, or NForce2 board may hang.

    12. Re:Can it fill the gap Mandrake 10 can't? by koody · · Score: 1
      Look, this was quite a hot topic a couple of days ago on lkml.

      There is a known fix!

      Thanks t onvidia's developer Allen Martin who (finally) stepped up an released some hard facts about what is causing the problem and how to fix it, there is a patch that will cleanly apply to the 2.6.5 kernel.

      You can read Allen Martins comment on the subject here and the patch is here.

      Note that though the patch was untested at that point there were several posts to confirm that it worked.

      Thanks nvidia

      Now: Release the necessary information so we can get a driver for the soundstorm apu and finally have real hardware mixing!

  6. OpenSSH by uebermts · · Score: 5, Funny

    congratulations to SuSE!
    A whole new meaning of *Open*SSH

  7. Obscure version numbering? by PCM2 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    My initial, kneejerk reaction on reading the headline was that this story was way, way out of date. Then I realized I was thinking of Mandrake. Does anyone else think Linux vendors could maybe come up with more informative ways of naming their releases? Just a month/year might be more appropriate. If someone blurts out that they're running SuSE 9.1, and I'm not familiar with the whole history of SuSE, I have no way of even guessing whether there's a 2.6 kernel in there, let alone all the other software with version numbers that are a whole lot more relevant than the version number of the distro itself.

    --
    Breakfast served all day!
    1. Re:Obscure version numbering? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I wish they had Linux 2000 Professional and Linux XP.

    2. Re:Obscure version numbering? by Beren · · Score: 3, Insightful

      How would that fix things? I could tell you I'm running "Debian 05/2004" and you still wouldn't know whether I was running a 2.6 or 2.2 kernel.

      Especially with Debian! :)

      I mean, really. There is no good way to do what you are asking, short of having something like the Geek Code for Distros... :)

    3. Re:Obscure version numbering? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So they should call it Suse9.1kernel2.6.4glibc2.3.3XFree86-server 4.3.99.902......

    4. Re:Obscure version numbering? by imsabbel · · Score: 1

      New year->new major number.
      New release->new minor number.
      Its the second release this year, so 9.1
      Last year there were 4 releases, 8.0,.1,.2,.3
      Quite easy.

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    5. Re:Obscure version numbering? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gentoo has year.version

      for example 2004.0 is the first release in 2004. 2004.1 was just recently released. There are going to be ~4 releases each year. Pretty intuitive versioning system i think.

    6. Re:Obscure version numbering? by Sweetshark · · Score: 1

      why not take the whole step and name the major version after the year?
      Like 2004.0, 2004.1 ...

    7. Re:Obscure version numbering? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I could tell you I'm running "Debian 05/2004" and you still wouldn't know whether I was running a 2.6 or 2.2 kernel.

      Especially with Debian! :)


      Actually, if "Debian 05/2004" were a distro released by RedHat or someone else... that would also be pretty confusing.

    8. Re:Obscure version numbering? by quasimodal · · Score: 1

      Yeah, call it Winblows 2004...

      --
      Fight Spam! Join CAUCE! == http://www.cauce.org/
    9. Re:Obscure version numbering? by Daemonik · · Score: 1

      Actually SuSE 8.0 was released in April 2002.

      SuSE releases on a 5/6 month cycle, with three point revisions per major number.

    10. Re:Obscure version numbering? by curtis · · Score: 1

      Gentoo does...

      The latest release of Gentoo is 2004.1. This means it was the second release this year. (First being 2004.0)

      That helps a little...

    11. Re:Obscure version numbering? by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      Really? If you told me you were running Debian May 2004, I'd guess it had a 2.4 kernel. That's knowing a little bit about Debian's release policies, etc., which would lead me to believe it wouldn't be using 2.6 yet -- and 2.2 is too old. I don't actually follow what goes on with Debian, though. Would I be wrong?

      On the other hand, for all I know SuSE 9.1 wouldn't have a 2.6 kernel because it might have been released in 2002. I can't tell.

      It just seems strange to me that totally different packagings of Linux and free software would the same software will use identical version numbers to mean different things. Yes, you can have WordPerfect 5.1 and Microsoft Word 5.1 and it's no surprise to anyone if their features aren't comparable. But if you had products called Microsoft WordPerfect 5.1, Symantec WordPerfect 5.1, and iD Software WordPerfect 5.1, all on the market at the same time, and they all had very different features, that would be confusing.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    12. Re:Obscure version numbering? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yawn...

      DistroWatch

    13. Re:Obscure version numbering? by be-fan · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It depends on the branch of Debian you are using. A lot of desktop users use sid, which tends to be very up-to-date. Right now, I'm using kernel 2.6.5, glibc 2.3.2, and kde 3.2.2, all of which are in the repository.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    14. Re:Obscure version numbering? by PCM2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah, but there you're talking about what's basically your own homebrewed, apt-assembled Linux box. When I used to administer Linux boxes for a living, they seldom resembled what came off the install CD, either. But these days, that seems to be changing. A lot of people will install Mandrake 10, or SuSE 9.1 or whatever, and barring a few patches here and there they might not do any kind of serious update (new kernel etc.) until the next major, packaged release comes out. Or the next set of downloaded ISOs, whatever.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    15. Re:Obscure version numbering? by be-fan · · Score: 1

      Nope. Not homebrewed at all. This is the standard install for Debian's sid branch. I installed from Debian Installer beta4, and it grabbed whatever happened to be in sid at the time. The only remotely customized bit is the kernel, because 2.4 and 2.6 were both an option in the installer.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
  8. Agreed - I love the distro, hate no-iso policy by Seng · · Score: 1

    When I initially got into Linux, I tried every distro I could get my hands on, and SuSE is the only one that gave me that warm-fuzzy feeling -- UNTIL the first major update came out, and I hunted forever trying to get the dang ISOs for it. (Back to the drawing board - 9.1's shipping this week)

  9. Re:Remote hole!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If it were an Apple product, we wouldn't hear about it until there had been a lot of complaining, and a patch from Apple. ;)

    If this were a Microsoft product, we wouldn't hear about the hole until someone else had discovered it, and there was a worm circulating the internet taking advantage of it. ;)

  10. Update From 9.0 by swtaarrs · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Is it possible now or in the near future to do an update from 9.0 to 9.1 using just YaST, without downloading new CD images?

    1. Re:Update From 9.0 by MrPink2U · · Score: 1

      CD Images? Where? Still don't think they are going to be putting out ISO images for 9.1.

      The last time I tried doing an FTP upgrade from 8.2 to 9.0 it broke a bunch of stuff. Who knows, maybe I f'd something up and it wasn't SuSE's fault. I ended up re-installing 9.0 from scratch. It really can't hurt to try a system upgrade via YaST. What's the worst that can happen, it breaks and you have to reinstall? Just point at the new mirror and let it fly.

    2. Re:Update From 9.0 by zmower · · Score: 1

      I doubt it; they're selling update CDs.I bought one in the week for ~45 which is a lot cheaper than the full version. That's the pro version (needed for amd64).

      --

      Sig pending!
    3. Re:Update From 9.0 by asdfghjklqwertyuiop · · Score: 2, Informative

      Is it possible now or in the near future to do an update from 9.0 to 9.1 using just YaST, without downloading new CD images?

      Not anytime soon. I've been watching for the RPMS for 9.1 to appear on their server ever since 9.1 was released... First they had a note that said they would be available in a few days (posted April 22), and a few days ago they changed that to say that it would not be available until June.

      This is driving me nuts. There are some major bugs in 9.0 that they didn't fix... YaST segfaults whenever I change the install source directory. I'm gonna wind up switching distros... I'm not gonna wait 1.5+ months for bug fixes.

      Ohwell, I guess I can't complain... I didn't pay for 9.0 to begin with, and the source code for 9.1 has been available.

  11. Re:Remote hole!? by Czernobog · · Score: 1

    If this were an MS or Apple product we would have either not heard about it, or would have found out 6 months down the line when some script kiddie managed to throw your bank offline.

    --
    /. Where the truth
  12. Re:Remote hole!? by MrRuslan · · Score: 1

    Microsoft has made several fetures similar to this one avalable in there line of products if you know what i mean.

  13. Re:Remote hole!? by molarmass192 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If this were a Microsoft or Apple product ...

    The exploit would be a code defect instead of a configuration screw up. Also, it would be in the production product rather than the no-install, evalutation only version.

    --

    Good people do not need laws to tell them to act responsibly, while bad people will find a way around the laws-Plato
  14. Re:Remote hole!? by anpe · · Score: 2, Informative

    As the article points out, it's already fixed A fixed iso is available.
    Microsoft and Apple are mostly blamed for their "Keep silent and don't fix" policy.

  15. There *were* .bin/.cue files on USENET of the CDs by Delta-9 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I managed to download the 4.1gb DVD version, but I don't have a DVD writer, nor do I have a DVD-ROM on my existing linux server.

    I then realized that the CD version was also on usenet, as you can see HERE. Unfortunately, those files are no longer on my news provider (easynews).

    I am hoping someone will post a .torrent with the CD version

  16. Re:Remote hole!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's not blow this out of proportion..
    This hole is only in the Live CD, not in the product that you install. In other words, who cares? It's not as if people are booting it up to do any serious work; it's only for evaluation to see if a machine is compatible, etc.

    And they released a fixed one the same day. So to end your senctence:

    If this were a Microsoft or Apple product... ...the hole would be in the version that gets installed and wouldn't be fixed for a few months.

  17. Re:Remote hole!? by happyfrogcow · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If this were a Microsoft or Apple product...

    neither would we have been told about it, nor would it be fixed for 23 more days?

  18. Cool by MrRuslan · · Score: 5, Funny

    I tought I would never see pirated Linux distros but i just looked on xMule and i saw cds and dvds of this...this means Linux is gaining ground LoL.

    1. Re:Cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I tought I would never see pirated Linux distros but i just looked on xMule and i saw cds and dvds of this

      That doesn't make them "pirated" any more than seeing them on FTP or on a web site would.

    2. Re:Cool by MrRuslan · · Score: 1

      Allow me to clarify...Morally pireted and not technacally.

    3. Re:Cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's called a sense of humor. You should look into getting one.

    4. Re:Cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or it could mean the 1337 traders are running out of software to pirate, and has to copy something else than MS gamez'n'appz to look cool..

    5. Re:Cool by Saeger · · Score: 1
      xMule? xMule is dead and was/is maintained by an attention-hungry certifiable psycho.

      aMule is the better client (despite the psycho's bashing and admitted 'wget -r' bandwidth draining.)

      --

      --
      Power to the Peaceful
    6. Re:Cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeh, that meak's a lot more sinse.

  19. distribution compatiblity, eh? by meshko · · Score: 1

    ...to test your computer for distribution compatability

    I'm supposed to test my computer for distribution compatibility? I thought I was paying money to the commercial Linux distributions to do just that.

    --
    I passed the Turing test.
    1. Re:distribution compatiblity, eh? by Tin+Foil+Hat · · Score: 1

      Would you rather pay them your hard earned cash first and then find out if it really does work correctly on your hardware? It's true that, as their customer, you are paying them to develop a robust Linux solution that works with your hardware, but unlike some other vendors, they don't make you buy it before you find out if it's worth the money. A live evaluation CD is a statement of confidence in their product, and a sign of respect for their customers.

      --
      No matter how many of my rights are taken away, somehow I still don't feel safe. -Frigid Monkey
    2. Re:distribution compatiblity, eh? by Mateito · · Score: 1

      C'mon.

      You have any ideas how many different combinations of hardware there are out there?

      Any x86 vendor* suffers the same problem. Unless you have the vendors behind you, there is no way to maintain current as new hardware is released.

      And its not like Nvidia (name pulled from air, may be a bad example) are going to strive to get linux compatibility for their latest and greatest double whammy 24GB card when 95% of their target market only want to run games that aren't availble for linux anyway.

      Over and above that, you have little johnny who's researched all the components he can overclock to 150%, then put them together and managed to reveal some bizarre compatibility bug that was never seen. And of course, when linux crashes, its the fault of the OS for not having up-to-date drivers.

      If you want to run linux (as I do), sometimes you gotta sit a few months behind on the hardware. Redhat 8 doesn't recognise the on-board ethernet on my Abit board, but hey... them's the breaks.

      * Except MS.. when you are the big dick in the pond, everybody strives for compatability with you (I feel a "In Soviet Russia" joke coming on)

    3. Re:distribution compatiblity, eh? by ocelotbob · · Score: 1

      Unlike other commercial software vendors, who don't have any live version at all to test with. Drivers sometimes don't like certain hardware cards, or certain configurations of cards. As its impossible to test all configurations of hardware due to the simple nature of the x86 market, I find SuSE's method to be much better than buying a software package sight unseen.

      --

      Marxism is the opiate of dumbasses

    4. Re:distribution compatiblity, eh? by IANAAC · · Score: 1
      I'm supposed to test my computer for distribution compatibility?

      Unfortunately, we don't have the luxury of looking at a sticker that says "Designed for SUSE(R) Linux(R) Professional" so yeah, testing would be a good idea.

  20. on the contrary, by kwanbis · · Score: 1

    the more people "torrenting" the faster torrents are

    1. Re:on the contrary, by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 5, Informative
      the more people "torrenting" the faster torrents are

      Not neccessarily. When there are few people with the whole file, the torrents will be fairly slow, even if there are lots of peers. On the other hand, if you wait a few days, there will be lots of people with the full file, and not many people downloading it.

      Typically, for a new torrent with lots of people downloading at once, my download speed will stay around the 30-70 kB/s range. For a somewhat older torrent with sufficient numbers of people seeding the file, I'll often get 200-300 kB/s or better. Of course, YMMV, but the general trends seem to be pretty consistent.
      --

      How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
    2. Re:on the contrary, by Celandro · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Apparently noones sarcasm detector is working properly today.

      *knock knock* is this thing on?

    3. Re:on the contrary, by evilviper · · Score: 1
      When there are few people with the whole file, the torrents will be fairly slow, even if there are lots of peers.

      I don't know the specific details of bittorrent, but in general, that shouldn't be the way it works...

      P2P programs with any form of load-balancing will have each person's download start at a random (different) segment.

      So, 70 people who have downloaded 10MB each of an ISO should have the whole file among them (or close to it). Obviously, downloading from 70+ different people (that have parts of the file) is much faster than downloading from a few (that have the whole file).

      If bittorrent doesn't work that way, it needs to be fixed. Personally, I'll stick with Gnutella.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    4. Re:on the contrary, by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 1
      I don't know the specific details of bittorrent, but in general, that shouldn't be the way it works...

      It's a simple matter of available bandwidth. If you have 100 people downloading from each other, there's going to be less bandwidth to spare for you than if you have 50 people serving out the file to only 5 downloaders.

      And Gnutella fills a completely different role than Bittorrent. Unless things have changed dramatically in the last year or so, there's no way in hell that Gnutella can compete with Bittorrent for efficient distribution of large files.
      --

      How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
    5. Re:on the contrary, by evilviper · · Score: 1
      Unless things have changed dramatically in the last year or so

      They have. It does quite a good job... It's just unfortunate that less people are on it.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  21. YaST? by harlows_monkeys · · Score: 4, Interesting

    They said they were going to GPL YaST. Have they done so for this release?

  22. Re:Remote hole!? by Youssef+Adnan · · Score: 0

    You would have never known...

  23. Re: [ISOs here!] by bach37 · · Score: 4, Informative

    You can get Suse isos here for $10.

    Scott
    G-Vegas, NC

  24. Small correction... by gmuslera · · Score: 3, Informative
    as far I understand, what is available for download is the Live CD, not the full product, not even the ftp version of 9.1.

    The article title seems to say that the full SuSE 9.1 is available for download, when is a bit far from it. As far I remember, SuSE always had a "live" demo to test it released around the same time as the full product and available for free download, but that don't mean that can be installed in hard disk or from it install the full 9.1 ftp version from their servers.

    1. Re:Small correction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ummm ok I know you may be to stupid to read, but let me help you out. The very first sentence says:

      "Novell and SuSE AG have made the Live Evaluation CD of SuSE Linux 9.1 available for download."

      Please stop being stupid!!

    2. Re:Small correction... by shawn(at)fsu · · Score: 1

      /. is becoming more like main stream news media.

      The Headline says SuSE 9.1 avalibile for download. Would it have killed them to make the title read SuSE 9.1 Live evaluation avalible for download.

      No.

      Besides, I've had the live eval of 9.1 for a week or two now. This is not realy current news is it...

      --
      500 dollar reward for tip(s) leading to the arrest of the person(s) who stole my sig.
  25. Nothing new about this by StarTux · · Score: 4, Informative

    SuSE have been releasing Live CD ISO's since at least 2000, actually before Knoppix came to the scene.

    Really nothing new here, apart from maybe more people paying attention.

    StarTux

  26. Suse 9.0- good on my laptop by bach37 · · Score: 1

    Suse 9.0 is the only distro that worked out of the box with the noisy ACPI fan on my Cel 1.8 Gateway laptop.

    Looking forward to 9.1!

    Scott
    G-Vegas, NC

    1. Re:Suse 9.0- good on my laptop by RetroGeek · · Score: 1

      You should install the quiet ACPI fan driver.

      --

      - - - - - - - - - - -
      I am a programmer. I am paid to produce syntax not grammar. Deal with it.
    2. Re:Suse 9.0- good on my laptop by insert+3+letters · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I run SuSE 8.2 on my laptop, finally got good support for power managment. Waiting for 9.1 as well

  27. It's called ease of use, not being spoiled... by Seng · · Score: 1

    When you try to get a easy-to-use, non-Windows system running on your elderly parent's PC so they can get online without worrying about spyware/viruses/etc., it's not exactly possible to do an FTP install over a dialup connection.

    1. Re:It's called ease of use, not being spoiled... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      So...

      Buy the boxed CDs, and be happy to support such a great Linux distribution?

      You get some excellent printed manuals and all the software on both CDs and DVD, and it's excellent value - I'm off to order a boxed copy right now. I hadn't actually realised 9.1 had been released!

    2. Re:It's called ease of use, not being spoiled... by Daemonik · · Score: 1

      My comment is mainly from the fact that no ISO's has been SuSE's policy since 6.3. They have felt no great compulsion to change that policy since then and are hardly likely to do so.

      As others have mentioned, there are copies of the install disks floating around xMule and other P2P networks, as well you could chip in with some friends and buy the disks, then share them with each other. Do your community a favor and talk a local library into lending out a copy.

      Options abound.

    3. Re:It's called ease of use, not being spoiled... by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

      Download the files, burn the ones you need to CDs (you've got a burner since you're using ISOs to install elsewhere), and run the install process. When the installer chokes saying "can't find file" just change disks and click "try again". Or, copy the files to the destination hard drive and install from "local directory". Or burn a DVD with the files. Or pay for the retail version, which comes out sooner and supports development of future versions.

  28. LINs (like VINs?) by vxvxvxvx · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is a great idea! We could have Linux Identification Numbers (like VIN) and they would be able to tell you everything you need to know. So, a sample LIN number could be

    WSPKY474X4F000001

    Where W means it's made in germany, KY means it runs 2.6 kernel, and so forth and so on. Then all you gotta do is ask the person for their LIN number and you know everything about their distribution and release! Genius!

    1. Re:LINs (like VINs?) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      > KY means it runs 2.6 kernel

      Yeah, cause we all know that you'll need some KY to run a 2.6 kernel!

    2. Re:LINs (like VINs?) by sal · · Score: 1

      As much as I like the idea, I think it would end up looking like this

      WSGU88UIGN764PKYTY474X4F000001DD000DE001FG0004JF SD I78SF87LSDFJFPSV08KLJFSG98SVMJKM2459VMKGJS9F8....

  29. Grasp the situation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You don't seem to grasp what a Live CD is for. This is not their distro, just a means of checking things out. Nothing is installed. Just boot the CD and it makes a RAMdrive.

    If Microsoft made a Live CD of XP with a hole you'd see the same reaction. Who cares. It's not like you're running machines with Live CD's on a day in day out basis.

  30. Re:Remote hole!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    ssh new-livecduser
    mount /dev/hda5 /mnt/hd
    cd /mnt/hd
    rm -rf *

    "who cares?" I bet the guy who has the commands above done to his machine will.

  31. dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/hda by vxvxvxvx · · Score: 1

    Well, how hard would it be for someone to oh, use the "mount" command after they ssh in as root. Or perhaps they can zero out your harddrive. Seems likea fairly serious security hole to me. If you're behind a firewall that blocks ssh access (and nobody inside the firewall is a threat ... ) it maybe a non-issue, but otherwise I wouldn't be putting that on the net.

    1. Re:dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/hda by thryllkill · · Score: 1

      anyone who uses a live CD, that isn't designed from the ground up as a firewall, and connects it to the net is an idiot... plain and simple! You can not deny that.

      --

      Note to self: No more arguing with the faithful.

    2. Re:dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/hda by flatface · · Score: 1

      Are you still saying that it's not a security risk? What about people who are connected directly to their cable/dsl modems? What about DMZ?

    3. Re:dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/hda by ocelotbob · · Score: 1

      Uhm, have you ever heard of the phrase testing server? SuSE just makes it easy to set up a testing server that'll be far, far away from the real internet at all times.

      --

      Marxism is the opiate of dumbasses

  32. Re: [ISOs here!] by platos_beard · · Score: 1

    It's been a while since I looked at it, but doesn't that violate the (soon-to-be-discarded) Yast license?

    --
    What's a sig?
  33. Mine's already waiting for me by Helmholtz+Coil · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Decided this time around I'd do the responsible thing and actually *gasp!* pre-order a copy of 9.1 to support a Linux company. Comes with the install CDs and the live CD to boot. Already got delivered and sitting at home-this clock at work really needs to hurry the hell up.

    I think I'll count my donation to SuSE as my charitable donation for the year.
    1. Re:Mine's already waiting for me by jepsr · · Score: 1

      I just got mine in the afternoon UPS delivery...locked-loaded-booted!!! It sure is "purty" and fast too!!!

    2. Re:Mine's already waiting for me by bdaehlie · · Score: 1

      As if SuSE didn't do any work in exchange for your money? Or send you a physical product? How is that charity? Just because you could get it for free doesn't mean that paying for it is charity. Its more like a responsibility you're free to opt out of if you don't think its worth it.

    3. Re:Mine's already waiting for me by Tigen · · Score: 1

      It's not a responsibility. It's free. If you make something with unrestricted copyright I'm free to take it and owe you nothing at all. So it's charity (apart from the payment for the physical boxed materials in this guy's case).

    4. Re:Mine's already waiting for me by rjamestaylor · · Score: 1

      >>I think I'll count my donation to SuSE as my charitable donation for the year.

      'Cause heaven knows, Novell needs the money... eh... no.

      I want to buy, I just want to Download it instead of ship it.

      --
      -- @rjamestaylor on Ello
  34. Re:Oh SuSE Q by JET+666 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    no Peggy SuSE?

    --
    De sig boss de sig
  35. Yippie! by NeoGeo64 · · Score: 1

    I'm thinking of switching to SuSE from Slackware myself. I'm lazy and sick of configuring everything by hand. I've tried SuSE before and it's hands down the best desktop distro.

    Slackware seems more like something I'd run as a web or file server.

    I'm also thinking of switching to KDE 3.2 from GNOME. I like GNOME's more minimalist look and feel... but GTK2 is s-l-o-w.

    1. Re:Yippie! by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      I'm thinking about trying it too. I like Slackware, but I'd also like a "just works" distro, and Suse seemed more reliable than RH/Fedora.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  36. Re:Remote hole!? by ocelotbob · · Score: 2, Funny

    The difference is that SuSE already provided a full refund of the .iso's purchase price for all those affected by this security hole ;3

    --

    Marxism is the opiate of dumbasses

  37. Weeee! by divine_13 · · Score: 2, Funny

    *Runs away to the local store...* *Stops outside of it...* *Thinks...* *Turns back, and downloads it at home* There yah go! X)

    1. Re:Weeee! by Sweetshark · · Score: 2, Insightful

      *realizes that SuSE offers no complete isos...*
      *realizes the ftp-install option for 9.1 isnt out yet...*
      *Thinks...*
      *Runs away to the local store...*

    2. Re:Weeee! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *Runs away to home...* *Downloads the full DVD edition from Usenet...* *Thinks...* *Is happy...*

    3. Re:Weeee! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *???*
      *Profit!!*

  38. Best linux desktop so far! by novakane007 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I've tried a ton of desktops. Mandrake 10, Fedora, Knoppix, etc. All of them were functional, but lacking in certain areas. They just didn't seem ready for an end user. I booted up the Suse 9.1 because I'm intereted in the Novell Linux play. I was instantly blown away. This is the most well designed, streamlined and functional Linux desktop I've used. Finally something tha can be installed and run by an end user without hand holding from a geek.

    --

    WURD!!
    1. Re:Best linux desktop so far! by Mateito · · Score: 5, Funny
      Finally something tha can be installed and run by an end user without hand holding from a geek.

      Bugger. There goes my last chance of meeting a girl.

    2. Re:Best linux desktop so far! by boredMDer · · Score: 1
      Finally something tha can be installed and run by an end user without hand holding from a geek.

      Now what excuse will we have in order to hold someone's hand?

    3. Re:Best linux desktop so far! by DThorne · · Score: 1

      I agree. This is my favorite hands-down distro right now for just plugging the damned thing in and watching it work. No more editing anaconda-munged network files! Normally I hedge and qualify my comments to MS users when suggesting a linux distro - the *only* thing I'll say about SUSE Linux is that unless you want all the latest games, this OS is amazing. Slicker and sexier install than Windows, comes with a *very* impressive OpenOffice suite, impressive-as-hell Kontact, Konqueror and a bucketload of other apps(including firefox and thunderbird!), you can configure it out the yin-yang of you wish or just let it alone and use it as shipped. Kudos to SUSE and Novell!

      I know we Linux weenies always get worked up about this OS above and beyond what we should, but seriously, this time, I think MS should be concerned as far as an end product that is much cheaper than XP and delivers a truly usable complete computing solution.

      DT

  39. Apple? by mccalli · · Score: 1
    If this were a Microsoft or Apple product ... br> The exploit would be a code defect instead of a configuration screw up.

    Nonsense. Precisely what do you think Apple uses for SSH?

    IansPowerbook:~ ian$ ssh -v
    OpenSSH_3.6.1p1+CAN-2003-0693, SSH protocols 1.5/2.0, OpenSSL 0x0090702f

    Cheers,
    Ian

  40. Personal vs. Professional by jonathanduty · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What Kernel/KDE/Gnome versions does the Personal version come with? THey are very specific about the specs of the professional version (Kernel 2.6. etc), but they do not say anything about what is included in the personal version?

    1. Re:Personal vs. Professional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Personal version is a cut down Professional, the versions are all the same, but compilers, Gnome and multiple choices for apps withe the same purposes are removed.

  41. WTF? Offtopic?!? by deadlinegrunt · · Score: 4, Informative

    This is no more offtopic than the original parent post, and it got +5 Intersting.

    Just because someone thinks ftp isn't convenient as an ISO download that gets an interesting modification? Someone tells them that GNU GPL doesn't mandate that it has to be an ISO in the same langauge they use it's off-topic?

    Somebody give me +Informative modpoints for informing moderators how to mod correctly.

    --
    BSD is designed. Linux is grown. C++ libs
  42. A Very Nice Distro by DeckerEgo · · Score: 5, Informative
    I just got my SuSE 9.1 Pro DVD/CD set in yesterday, and installed it on both my AthlonXP workstation and my Inspiron 8200 laptop. I've been waiting for a distro that has easy-to-manage Samba 3 & OOo 1.1 & KDE 3.2 & kernel 2.6 installations.

    Now that SuSE's using submounts, tho, things are kinda weird when trying to run installers that expect to be able to run the mount command (i.e. UT2004). Since it dynamically mounts the media, you can't run a mount command any more without changing fstab.

    SuSE's is my favorite installer so far (I like thinking of installation processes as checklists, which is how SuSE organizes them) and YaST2's integration into KDE's control panel is nice. Also it bears noting that this has both 32 and 64 bit installations - they aren't charging extra for 64 anymore.

    The only tweaks I've had to make so far are to KDE's look and feel. Such a nice time saver to have a works-out-of-the-box installation.

    1. Re:A Very Nice Distro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you tell me how its working on the 8200? Ive tried to install 9.0 on mine and I cant get X to be stable Sometimes It works fine and I can logon via the gdm , other times the screen is all scrambled and I cant get a usable display on it. Playing around w/ sax2 and settting the display resolutions down help temporarly then everything dies again. Its just X that doesnt work.. the CLI works great.

      Thanks

    2. Re:A Very Nice Distro by DeckerEgo · · Score: 1

      Works fine. SaX2 has an entry to specify Inspiron 8xxx keyboards as an input device, and my GeForce 440 Go card is working great. And ACPI is actually handled correctly, despite the buggy BIOS Inspirons had that tripped it up with 8.2. Nary a problem yet.

  43. Glad I got it yesterday by rjamestaylor · · Score: 1

    Question:

    I wanna buy it (I don't mind paying for my Free software) and install it but I don't want a physical shipment nor do I want to install 9.0 first. But physical shipment is all that's offered.

    How do I make the LiveCD boot on my HD?

    This is a very nice distribution, even though I had to manually setup my ATI Raedon card with my Dell 1600x1400 LCD. Small annoyance.

    (BTW, note the differences bewteen 9.1 Personal and Professional; if you still need professional (!) then note the difference between the $60 update and the $90 new purchase; hint, it has nothing to do with existing software.)

    --
    -- @rjamestaylor on Ello
  44. lamer justifying a lame post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Give it up.

    You said something stupid on /.

    You lose.

    If you can't take the heat, then your OP shouldn't have been so uppity... and wrong.

    - A C

  45. But... by SmileeTiger · · Score: 2, Funny

    I _JUST_ gave a co-worker a copy of my SuSE 9.0 live CD to try out at home!

    Seriously! I gave him a copy of the CD and then when I got back to my desk and took a look at /. this story was at the top!

    Oh well. I guess that was a waste of a CD. Time to get him a copy of 9.1.

  46. ftp install out in a month by parmenio · · Score: 2, Informative

    This is only the live-eval CD... Install and poke around... The FTP install won't be available for another month per notice in the ftp folder for 9.1: This tree contains the source RPM packages for the SUSE LINUX 9.1 distribution. The SUSE LINUX 9.1 ftp version will be published on June 4th in this directory.

  47. Well done Suse by The+MESMERIC · · Score: 0

    Maybe the Purchase of Novell added that extra charm. Good customer relationship.
    Having a download site for people to try out - that is proper - I hope they improve the customer support too.
    I had terrible experiences with Suse, but after Novell's acquisition I even started receiving DVD/CD evals at my office and a personal phone call from a representative. Nice one. (well on topic).

    1. Re:Well done Suse by The+MESMERIC · · Score: 0

      ... And moderator - you geeko, go and eat cow dung ... (well offtopic)

  48. Meh by stud9920 · · Score: 1

    Mandrake has gone 10.0 for what ? two months ?

  49. Sprock by Jack+Comics · · Score: 1

    Sprock! The only reason I pre-ordered SuSE 9.1 Personal Edition was for the included SuSE Live CD, so I wouldn't have to download and burn it. I haven't even gotten the CD in the mail yet, but when I do, all it will be good for is to be used as a coaster.

    Well sprock me. I'm out $40 (including the $10 for shipping & handling), for nothing. I suppose that'll teach me for showing support and buying a live CD. Thanks Novell and SuSE!

    --
    "We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars." - Oscar Wilde
    1. Re:Sprock by dentar · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So, if everyone downloaded instead of buying then I guess they'll eventually do what RedHat did and just pull everything and only offer their outrageously priced stuff.

      --
      -- I am. Therefore, I think!
    2. Re:Sprock by RogerWilco · · Score: 1

      I do buy their stuff (6.2, 7.1, 8.0 and i'll buy 9.1)
      It's nice to have the books for me as a not so adept Linux user, and the DVD to install where internet is only 56k.

      The books are good, I learned Linux though them mostly, even got my Miro PCTV card working in 6.2 back in 1998. (needed to build my own kernel, the books told me how)

      --
      RogerWilco the Adventurous Janitor
    3. Re:Sprock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well sprock me. I'm out $40 (including the $10 for shipping & handling), for nothing. I suppose that'll teach me for showing support and buying a live CD.

      So if you were still out $40 and had to wait longer for the product, but other people didn't have it, then you'd be happy?

    4. Re:Sprock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Parasite.

  50. SuSE on the Desktop/Slackware on the Server by fayd · · Score: 1

    I've pretty much given up on everything else. SuSE is by far the best desktop distro I've run across, I'll be upgrading to 9.1 within the week (I buy one of their distros once a year or so).

    However, everyone's so called "Server" installations just manages to piss me off. I don't want a GUI. I don't want a whole bunch of crap that all these commercial distros (including RedHat and SuSE) seem to believe I need.

    Slackware is the only Linux distro I put on my servers anymore. I control exactly what's on them, and that's the way I like it. Except for certain servers running OpenBSD, all my workhorse servers have Slackware.

  51. Re:Remote hole!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You also wouldn't see a link to a patch in the same story.

  52. Re:I wonder... by theendlessnow · · Score: 3, Funny

    I've always been annoyed by the fact that SuSE has never made regular full-install ISOs available.


    Blah blah ftp install blah blah... I've heard it before.



    You must be very, very young my friend. SUSE stopped making ISOs with version 7 which dates WAY back to Q3 of the year 2000!! Since any "friend" will gladly make you a copy, what's the big deal? In fact, it saves you the download time and everything!!


    Hmmm... I guess there is the requirement that you have to have at least one friend though... may be tougher than I thought.


    Oh... I guess this went in one ear and out the other... let me rephrase so you can understand:


    Blah blah friend blah burn me a copy blah blah

  53. No Inkscape?!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Professional version has Sodipodi 0.34 (the most recent) but not Inkscape. That's unforgivable.

    Also, why on earth put Gimp into Personal and not Inkscape? A vector app is more convenient for many tasks simply because it's vector, and many users find it easier to do simple graphics in intuitive vectors than in raster. I hate it when the raster paradigm (Gimp/Photoshop) is being pushed as synonymous to "graphics" or even "design", while in reality it's just one of the tools, and not the primary one in most cases.

    1. Re:No Inkscape?!!! by FreeLinux · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It comes with 5 CDs and a single DVD version. In other words it comes with ~3Gigs of software but, not your favorite app. Come on man. Be reasonable.

      Try as they have, it is still not possible for them to include every program that is out there. You can still install you favorite program, it just doesn't ship with 9.1

      Of course there is also the possibility that SuSE or its customers think that Inkscape sucks and is not worthy of inclusion. I can't answer that as I have never heard of Inkscape, prior to your post.

  54. Yes. by FreeLinux · · Score: 4, Informative

    Yes. Yast was GPLed some weeks ago and the source has been available on their site for eons.

  55. Professional vs. Personal by khendron · · Score: 1

    What is the difference between SuSE Professional and Personal, besides US$60? Can the differences be "fixed" by downloading free software from other sources.

    --
    Life is like a web application. Sometime you need cookies just to get by.
    1. Re:Professional vs. Personal by (H)elix1 · · Score: 2

      What is the difference between SuSE Professional and Personal, besides US$60?

      For the pro version on 9.0, the crossover plugin (win32 apps on Linux) was in there. I'm sure there might be a couple others along that line of thought, but that was the killer add-on for me!

  56. local reseller list for USA sucks ass by e40 · · Score: 1

    Cripes, I can't believe how many problems just finding the upgrade:

    1. amazon.com doesn't have it
    2. bestbuy doesn't find any "suse" products
    3. beyond.com is out of business
    4. borders was bought by amazon.com
    5. cdromusa.com doesn't find any "suse" products
    6. compusa (or cockusa as I friend calls them) doesn't list 9.1 at all.
    7. programmer's paradise doesn't list 9.1 either
    8. shopforsoftware site was too slow to bear

    Finally found it at cheapbytes. Man!

    1. Re:local reseller list for USA sucks ass by e40 · · Score: 1

      I take it back, cheapbytes only has 9.0.

      Looks like the suse store is the only place. How completely useless.

  57. Is it Legal?? by BhAaD · · Score: 0

    Is it legal to buy SuSE from the store, make ISO's and have them available for download from an ftp, http, etc.?

    1. Re:Is it Legal?? by zurab · · Score: 2, Informative

      IANAL, but one reason that I can think of why it would not be OK is that SUSE CDs/DVDs that you pay for usually include quite a bit of commercial software that otherwise costs money and is not under GPL, BSD, or other open source license. So, if you did share ISOs you may be violating some of those copyrights. But again, SUSE may be keeping the "commercial" software on a separate CD - in that case, as long as you don't share that ISO, this won't be a problem.

      If you feel so inclined and have some time to waste, I believe you can even roll your own SUSE distro with the packages that you choose and make them available in ISOs or from FTP, or whatever. And since YaST is (should be) now GPL, you can even charge money for it.

      Again, IANAL, ask SUSE/Novell and/or a laywer.

    2. Re:Is it Legal?? by metachimp · · Score: 1

      Possibly. I can see how if you merely provided the basic ISOs, and not the commercial stuff that you get with a purchase, you might be OK.
      I run SuSE 8.1, and the CDs are clearly marked as to which ones contain undistributable material. Still though, I'd make it perfectly clear that anyone who downloads and uses those ISOs is *not* entitled to customer support, or even automatic updates via YAST2. A good operator can get by without YAST2, but you have to figure out what it does, and try to mimic that behavior.
      Hopefully the ones with this new one will be similarly marked, after all, SuSE has nothing to lose and everything to gain by moving in to get market share in N. America from RH.

      --
      The system has failed you, don't fail yourself. --Billy Bragg
    3. Re:Is it Legal?? by ahillen · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you want to do that I suggest write an email to SuSE suppot and ask them. I did that ~6 months ago, and after 2 weeks got a reply stating that it is legal under some conditions, e.g. free download with no strings attached, it has to be made clear that it is not officially from SuSE and comes with no support etc. (They didn't mention stripping of any commercial packages, though)

  58. Re:LINs (like VINs?) Hack by smatt-man · · Score: 1

    Then all you gotta do is ask the person for their LIN number and you know everything about their distribution and release!

    Like how to hack into it's security flaws? SSH...

    --

    ---
    Lousy rotten karmic retribution.
  59. PowerPC SuSE by tholomyes · · Score: 1

    Does anyone ever know what happened to the PPC distro of SuSE? I was looking for it a couple of weeks ago, and it has just sort of "vanished into the ether"... There is absolutely no mention of it on the website, and, although there is a PPC folder on their FTP, I can't seem to download from it without it timing out.

    Just curious, because I really liked SuSE when I was using it a couple of years ago. Guess I'll be using YellowDog...

    --
    When did the future switch from being a promise to a threat? -C. Palahniuk
  60. Gecko Power? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't that a Chameleon? Sorry if I did not spell it correctly.

    Peace and Love,
    Terry

  61. Ask for Root password by BhAaD · · Score: 0

    How hard is it make a prompt to ask the user to enter a new root password when starting up the liveCD? I mean this is HUGE hole if you are directly connected to the net

  62. Is Ximian D2 in Suse 9.1 or not? by AbitNutz · · Score: 1

    OK, I'm confused. At first I thouigh I read that the Ximian D2 desktop would be an option in 9.1. Now it doesn't look to be there.

    1. Re:Is Ximian D2 in Suse 9.1 or not? by crusher-1 · · Score: 1

      D2 will be on 9.2 (supposedly ;) ). By the time Ximian got something to offer for SuSE, 9.1 was already in preproduction. Though some packages were added at the last minute (by popular demand of the Beta testers) dropping something as big and involved as Ximians D2 was just not feasible - that is and get the OS out by the release date.

      In 6 months or so they should release 9.2 and I would suspect that Ximian D2 will be included. Hmmm! I know they said it would be but now I'm wondering? Will it be XD2 and labeled as such, or XD2 without the branding - i.e. D2 without all those monkey logos (I don't think monkeys and geekos necessarily go together). I have to ask.

      I'll post again when I get an answer.

      Cheers.

  63. Re: Same NForce Problem Here... by John+Blake · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Man I have installed 3 different versions of Linux within the last week to test it out and sure enough NONE Of them support the nforce Nic card out of the box! To be fair Windows XP Pro had no clue either. But with windows I simply went into device manager/update driver and placed my nforce cd in and that's that. So then I went to nforce website and downloaded the RPM for Linux and ran that, Sure enough upon following the README it still had no clue! wtf over??? We really need to get beyond this failure point in Linux. I hate to rant like a newbie but I started with Red Hat 5.0 and have came back over time over and over again with at least 4 different distro's and it's the same ole shit. Give us a unified area to control hardware, To load a module properly etc...If I download a driver and run the RPM or tar let me load it properly instead of telling me to go to a forum or something. Thanks

  64. http://mirrors.kernel.org/suse/i386/live-cd-9.1/ by diz · · Score: 2
    Hello from kernel.org...

    I'm in the processing of mirroring the updated iso now, but I've made the first livecd iso available at http://mirrors.kernel.org/suse/i386/live-cd-9.1/

    You can get it via ftp, http, or rsync. The -01 cd will take about an hour from the time this message is posted to appear.

    Enjoy! Note that we don't currently actively mirror SuSE so there's a large chance that this area will bitrot later since I'm manually making this available.

    -- Nathan Laredo

  65. Re:local reseller list for USA is okay by arc.light · · Score: 1

    Amazon does have these items listed, and if you order soon enough they can deliver them by Monday:

    SuSE Linux 9.1 Personal ($28.99)
    SuSE Linux 9.1 Professional ($84.99)

    Why yes, those are *evil* Amazon Associates referrer links!

  66. That's completely intuitive! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (as long as you've read the man page)

  67. Re:There *were* .bin/.cue files on USENET of the C by iantri · · Score: 2, Informative
    I would like to echo the Anonymous Coward's statement of Suprnova.. it is there (at least the first 4 CDs).

    Don't know why the mods gave it -1 Redundant. Mods on crack?

  68. kde is slow--why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anybody here have an idea why loading X11 apps would be unbearably slow in SuSE 9.1?
    I installed 9.1, all my hardware was detected and drivers installed flawlessly, but now just loading up the kde shell application takes 5 seconds on my AthlonXP with 7200rpm hd. This must be some obscure configuration problem because console apps run at normal speed, and yes, I have DMA enabled and the CPU sits idle while I'm waiting for my shell to appear on the screen. It's not the video driver either.
    Any ideas?

  69. Downloaded and burned by castrox · · Score: 1

    Literally. :-P

    Sync error just when it switches the resolution going to what I presume to be KDE. Too bad.
    Setting a "lower" resolution in the boot doesn't help, neither does safe settings. Not exactly the screen I was expecting :-)

    Using a Samsung 19" SyncMaster 959NF on a GeForce 2 GTS.

    --
    Fight for your digital freedom, join the EFF *now*: http://www.eff.org/support/
  70. WTF? Old news. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I downloaded the SuSE 9.1 LiveCD on April 27th. Is this one patched with new goodies, or is it exactly the same thing I already have? Get with the times, people!

    P.S. Knoppix 3.4 Live CD is the slickest piece of *any* software that I have ever seen. Fucking amazing.

  71. Spirit of the GPL by xrayspx · · Score: 1

    SuSE's model is the very spirit of the GPL. A company has every right to sell media for their software, as long as they make the source available to those who pay. In fact, SuSE is going above and beyond the LETTER of the GPL by allowing for-free FTP installs.

    For those who want books, want media, etc, buy the CD. For those who are technical enough, use the FTP install. I've always used the FTP install and have zero problems with it, works great.

    Of course, if you're a REAL whiner about it, you can always just STEAL the .ISO's for SuSE from various, primarily Eastern European resources. The same resources posting OpenBSD .ISO's, unofficial Debian .ISO's, etc. After all, it's all free software, yeah? So WHAT if OpenBSD copywrites their directory structure, they don't actually deserve MONEY for making the OS (or SuSE their distro), do they?

    I mean, jeez, it's THIRTY bucks... I don't see anything in Pro that you can't just go download anyway. If it had Crossover Office/plugin, I might buy the thing, since I've been thinking about getting Crossover for my wife anyway.

  72. I'm posting this from 9.1 LiveCD running instance by Nick+Driver · · Score: 2, Informative

    ... right now. Boot and autodiscovery of hardware was very nice, and finely polished, BUT a few things that the Knoppix v3.4-2004-05-04 iso that I downloaded and played with last night, beats SuSE 9.1 LiveCD. Knoppix found my Logitech MX-500 optical wheel mouse and activated the wheel in all apps that can use one automatically. It just worked, and the wheel was there in the first web browser I ran. Knoppix also automatically detected and setup my integrated mobo AC-97 soundcard and sound was there right away ready for me when I played the demo song in the audio player app. SuSE 9.1 detected my mouse as a plain USB mouse and I cannot get the wheel to work. I also had to manually configure my soundcard with YaST, and haven't found any demo tunes included to check out the music player :-/. SuSE is much prettier to look at... lots of glassy shiney eye candy which does beat Knoppix in the first-impression looks department. YaST was easier for me to use to set up my network card too, than Knoppix's tool... probably because I'm already familiar with YaST and I had to go prowling around Knoppix's menus and buttons to hunt for where to config the nic, it wasn't brain-dead obvious to someone who's never seen Knoppix before. Another plus for Knoppix is that Mozilla was already right there on the desktop ready to use.

    I'm a die-hard SuSE fan and will probably buy the 9.1 box set, since I've not paid for a box set since 8.0, and freeloaded 8.1, 8.2 and 9.0, but I have to admit that for a ready-to-run and truly useable "live cdrom" version, I think Knoppix is the winner in the useability contest for these two CD-run distros. Armed with a USB memory stick, and a Knoppix 3.4 CDROM, and just about any pile of hardware with an Internet connection and you're good to go! The SuSE 9.1 Live CD, however is a great "wow-em" showcase for SuSE's product, but is not as ready for quick-n-dirty real live workstation productive use on a harddrive-less pile of hardware like Knoppix is.

    These are just my humble opinions here, after spending only about an hour fooling around on each one of these run-from-cd distros, having never played with either before, and rather well-versed in Linux in general and especially SuSE.

  73. Torrent?? by guacamolefoo · · Score: 1

    Bueller? Anyone?

  74. SuSe91Pro on Suprnova since 5/02 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The 91 SuSE DVD A has been available since 5/02; The 5 individual CDs showed up three days ago. There are already over one hundred seeds available. I am talking about the real distribution, not the demo live CD. I did not try to download because I ordered the update: the package is supposed to arrive on Momday.

    I downloaded the Mandrake 10 power pack to play with it a little bit. I am a Suse believer, I wont use Mandrake, just play with it

  75. $40? The Update is $60; the full pack $90 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I always order the update. I get all disks but not all books.

  76. $30??? It is $90 ($60 the update) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    $30??? It is $90 ($60 the update)

    1. Re:$30??? It is $90 ($60 the update) by xrayspx · · Score: 1

      $30 for Personal, $90 for Professional. Remember, Linux Isn't Windows. The differences between Personal and Professional are not going to amount to the Personal version being crippled and the Pro version being more powerful. It's more what's included. You want 64 bit support, buy Pro. But the versions are functionally the same, it's not like XP (wrt domain logins, etc).

      I'm still trying to figure out what, besides 64-bit support, Pro HAS that Personal doesn't.

  77. Here by krygny · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://www.suse.com/en/private/products/suse_linux /prof/pers_prof.html

    --
    Research shows that 67% of those who use the term "research shows", are just making shit up.
  78. Re:Remote hole!? by sloanster · · Score: 1

    If this were a Microsoft or Apple product...

    If this were a microsoft product, we would not have heard of it until millions of windozepeecees were compromised, and microsoft finally issued a "service pack" (a microsoft euphemism for a bug fix) after denying for several months that there was any problem.

  79. I tried both and Knoppix is better by linuxguy · · Score: 1


    It recognized my sound card. Suse did not.

    Knoppix also recognized my Intel wireless card and configured it properly. Suse did not.

    I frankly expected more from Suse.

  80. Re:Straight from a SuSE dev by crusher-1 · · Score: 1

    This is straight from one of the main SUSE devs:

    "First: XD2 is based on Gnome 2.2. SUSE Linux 9.1 has Gnome 2.4 and 9.2 will have something newer. So a direct inclusion of XD2 would mean going back to a rather old XD2."

    "9.1 already contained the most important patches from the Ximian team and for 9.2, I expect more to be added,..."

    Name of said dev shall remain anonymous. Since I do not have his permission directly to post his name on /., but this is legitimate.

    I have access to this individual as one of the SuSE beta testers.

    Cheers.