Slashdot Mirror


Japanese Cell Phones Offer a Glimpse of the Future

Dynamoo writes "Vodafone K.K. have announced a new range of phones, available exclusively in Japan which easily beat everything else in terms of features. In particular, two phones from Sharp, the V402SH and V602SH between them boast a TV tuner, camera with optical zoom, virtual karaoke machine and dog bark translater (woof woof), according to this review. Perhaps some features are more useful than others, but with a bit of luck we'll see these features in worldwide mobiles sometime in 2005. In the meantime I guess I'll just have to learn to speak dog by myself."

313 comments

  1. Hmm... by Lanzaa · · Score: 4, Funny

    I need a klingon translator. That would be better.

    1. Re:Hmm... by nuclear305 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      How is this offtopic? The story mentions a bark translator...and the poster wants a klingon translator instead.

      Personally, I think a klingon translator would be more useful...

      In my eyes, cell phones are starting to follow the path much like ICQ. They originally started out simple and functional...then it turned into a race to see how many useless features could be packed into it--rendering it mostly useless.

    2. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is there a Klingon word for loneliness?

      Ah, yes: Ghardak!

    3. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hah look me. I post about dog translator, get mod offtopic.

    4. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only because there is no, "Racist, Inbred, Prisoner Abusing AmeriKKKan Moron" moderation option.

    5. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like a good enough excuse to incorrectly moderate. :-)

    6. Re:Hmm... by badman99 · · Score: 0

      I just want someoneone to call me.....I get so lonely sometimes.... +61405685723

    7. Re:Hmm... by Talinom · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes. Star Trek.

      I am a simple person with simple tastes.

      1) I want a phone that works like a phone should work. No games, no internet, no walkie-talkie functions, and no stinkin' roaming or overage fees. An easy to use directory would be nice, though.

      2) I want this same phone to look exactly like the communicators on ST:TOS. Voice recognition, too, so when I say "Kirk to Enterprise" or "Kirk to Starbase 1" it dials the programmed number.

      Really, is that asking too much?

      --
      "Giving money and power to governments is like giving whiskey and car keys to teenage boys." - P.J. O'Rourke
    8. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You Aussies!

      Oh wait, I am one too. +61 410 502 217

    9. Re:Hmm... by The+Original+Yama · · Score: 1

      One step closer to a universal translator.

    10. Re:Hmm... by tarunthegreat2 · · Score: 1

      Well, see I'm not so sure you can draw that parallel.. ICQ was (and I suppose is..haven't used it since the 'Bloat') a messaging client. And there's not much it can do to get out of that box (being a 2d piece of code). But what used to be a cellphone is already so much more. I don't think they should be called cellphones anymore anyway - 'Personal Communicator' or some such marketing poop would be more appropriate...like what Nokia calls its 9000 series. Once you've put a TV Tuner into a cellphone (complete with obligatory "Imagine a Beowulf cluster of these...") you've pretty much got something else there (Let's not forget the 3300 by the same company - MP3 Player or N-GAGE - gaming device). A better parallel is Yahoo I think.. It also got bloated, and then along came Google. I can't wait for the launch of 'GooglePhone'.... I wonder what happens when u press the "I'm feeling lucky" button...

    11. Re:Hmm... by zonker · · Score: 0

      well looking at the multibillion dollar industry that is the cellphone industry, it would seem that yes that is too much to ask for...

    12. Re:Hmm... by Kadagan+AU · · Score: 1

      Yes. That would be very useful next time I walk in to a 7-11 late at night, and there's a klingon behind the counter. I hate when that happens. So hard to understand him.

      --
      This space for rent, inquire within.
    13. Re:Hmm... by SillyNickName4me · · Score: 1

      Somehow that is the way any computerized consumer product seems to go...

      Can anyone explain me what the use is of this built in karaoke feature anyway? I'd hope it also comes with earphones for all participants? that would at least be a usefull feature ;)

    14. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a name for this, it's called SSS (Second System Syndrome) and history is resplendant with examples. Just a few are:

      unix, windows, HTML, Gulf wars etc.

      -spider

    15. Re:Hmm... by Tellalian · · Score: 1

      And get beaten senselessly by the first Klingon I run across because it translated "hello" into "your family has no honor!"?

      No thank you.

  2. Do we need these features? by Espectr0 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    They actually want to make a regular computer inside the cell phone.. I actually want a cell phone that can be heard everywhere, with a nice battery and perhaps send pictures and such (which can already be done).

    1. Re:Do we need these features? by Stopmotioncleaverman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It depends on who you define as 'we'.

      You and I, it would appear not. The general, cellphone-buying market? Maybe.

      It has seemed to me for a while that cellphones are really trying to be PDAs. But then if you want a device that does everything that a PDA can do..........why not just buy a freakin' PDA? And if you want a portable computer..........why not just buy a freakin' PDA?

      I want a cellphone that I can walk around with, and that goes bring bring hello. Cellular. Phone. If I'd wanted a PDA, I'd have bought one.

      However, kids and city boy executives with shiny suits, who are, let's face it, the main market sector buying new phones, seem to want the latest, greatest, smartest, flashiest, most function-packed portable computers. And if there's demand for it, then cellphone manufacturers will make it. It's just a shame as far as I'm concerned that I have to buy some bloated device full of functions I'll never use and will chew up battery power at the rate of a small fish-gutting farm.

      I know, if I want something that just goes bring bring hello, I could just carry a Soviet brick around with me. Unfortunately the last time I tried my soviet brick on my network it seemed to fall off regularly. That and the fact that my pockets aren't made of high-tensile reinforced nanofibres to carry the extreme weight :)

    2. Re:Do we need these features? by moxruby · · Score: 4, Insightful

      if you want a portable computer..........why not just buy a freakin' PDA?

      Because a PDA, while useful, is bulky and an additional gadget to carry around - if your going to carry a PDA, it might as well have an inbuilt phone.
      The current crop of "smart phones" are too big, however a few more years of minituarisation and we'll see cheap phones with good battery life and the regular PDA features such as calendar, internet access, decent addressbook, mp3 player, java VM, email client etc. in a form factor around that of today's regular phones.

      The tech is not quite ready yet, but I predict that within ten years, nearly everyone will be carrying a tiny phone-come-PDA with an inbuilt camera.

    3. Re:Do we need these features? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Japanese people don't _talk_ on their cell phones!

    4. Re:Do we need these features? by Stevyn · · Score: 1

      Well yeah, what we really all want is good coverage and long battery life. However, people don't want large batteries and a huge antenna. Consumers usually chose the cool gadget over the practical one. I recently got a new phone from verizon. It's cheap, great batter life, and getter reception than my previous phone. It doesn't have any special features. But the point is I'm limited to the network. They only provider in my area is verizon and it's not even that good at my house. And remember, verizon makes the network and it's up to them to make it better, not nokia. More towers are needed and that's expensive, so verizon just sells cool phones so their customers don't realize the service is shitty for the price we pay.

    5. Re:Do we need these features? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i don't know why this post is modded informative rather than troll or flamebait. it offers no insight at all, just more complaining and questionable humor.

    6. Re:Do we need these features? by Texas+Rose+on+Lava+L · · Score: 3, Informative

      The Economist recently had an interesting article on how cell phones are marketed and why people buy them. Basically, when (some) people buy phones, they're looking more for a status symbol than for a device to actually make phone calls on. For example, teenagers might spend $3 on a ringtone because they're looking for a way to establish an identity.

    7. Re:Do we need these features? by lingqi · · Score: 1
      however a few more years of minituarisation and we'll see cheap phones with good battery life and the regular PDA features such as calendar, internet access, decent addressbook, mp3 player, java VM, email client etc. in a form factor around that of today's regular phones.

      you don't need to wait a few years. pretty much every thing you listed is in my old-ass docomo phone and it's older than sand. i don't think it's the waiting but rather, damn, why does cellphone technology suck so bad in the US (it's more like a complain / observation than a question - many explanations of said suckage has already been posted here)

      --

      My life in the land of the rising sun.

    8. Re:Do we need these features? by Zakabog · · Score: 1

      The current crop of "smart phones" are too big, however a few more years of minituarisation and we'll see cheap phones with good battery life and the regular PDA features such as calendar, internet access, decent addressbook, mp3 player, java VM, email client etc. in a form factor around that of today's regular phones.

      Except for mp3 player (well technically it can play MP3 type files, but the storage space is limited to the sim card) and address book, my phone does all that. And it also has a built in camera. It's a Samsung E715. It's great on battery life (last about 3 days with 2 hours of talk time, or if I use the camera a lot or have a lot of calls it lasts around 2 days.) It has an organic LCD screen so I can see the screen in the dark without wasting the battery powering a back light. And if you really want an MP3 player why not just buy a MP3 player? They're really tiny, much smaller than a PDA or even a cell phone. The address book, well this phone could probably do it if it has support for CF cards. They will probably add that to their next top of the line phone anyway (store more pictures, maybe they might include a better camera too for higher res pics, although currently the built in camera has pretty impressive image quality.) That could also add MP3 support right there. The phone I have now is way small and it has a built in antanae (called an intenna or something heh) I'm sure if they made it external, they'd have room inside the phone for a CF card reader (or maybe not, this phone doesn't seem that much larger than my old samsung phone with external antanae and no camera.)

    9. Re:Do we need these features? by G-funk · · Score: 1

      You have 3 new messages. In other news, your dog wants steak.

      Sorry, it had to be said.

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
    10. Re:Do we need these features? by bhmit1 · · Score: 1

      we'll see cheap phones with good battery life and the regular PDA features such as calendar, internet access, decent addressbook, mp3 player, java VM, email client etc.

      Here here.

      I'm sad to admit that I've been known to go out for a day in the city (DC if it matters) with a cell phone, pda, mp3 player, a camera, plus a hands free piece and a pair of headphones. Give me a single device with all that, even if it's a little bulky, and I'd be happy.

      However, I'd add to the above list a thumb keyboard, good display, fm tuner, voice recorder, speaker phone, bluetooth, and GPS. That way, as big as the thing may be, it can be put in a bag, left in a jacket pocket, or where ever, and all I need is a wireless ear piece for most usage. And when I need the internet, email, a camera, etc, who cares if it's a little bulky. It's one self contained device instead of the 3 or 4 I'd otherwise have, not to mention fewer batteries, cables, cases, etc.

      Finally, the big thing I see coming down the pipe is a way to reliably disable features on the phone. Going somewhere with trade secrets? It would be nice to show that the camera is off and can't be turned back on until I leave. Getting on a plane? It would be nice to use the pda or listen to some music without *gasp* turning on the phone.

      Once that's done, how about some standards support on these things. Connecting email to an IMAP server shouldn't be so hard. Oh, and how about a way to quickly move the chip from one phone to another for when I want to "slim down".

    11. Re:Do we need these features? by jandrese · · Score: 1

      3 days idle is considered "great" battery life these days? Whatever happened to the phone only needing to be recharged once a week with a few hours of talk time? Did the extreme miniaturization trend start eating into battery life? That would be unfortunate, as the battery life is one of the primary features of the phone, and the dog translater is definatly a secondary feature.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    12. Re:Do we need these features? by trollhaugen · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Japanese mobile phones run on a different network than US cellular phones, which perhaps indicates why they're so much smaller and lightweight than US phones. Although they have more features, they don't use up an exorbitant amount of power (although, in Japan, you can go to some convenience stores like 7-11 and get your phone charged at a vending machine while taking money out of an ATM). US phones look like the "dealbreaker" phones Micheal Douglas uses on the beach in "Wall Street" compared to the thin, light, Japanese models. An extraordinary high percentage of the Japanese population have mobile phones, most notably young people. They don't have PDA's really, but everyone has a phone and dare I say it, they are practically addicted to them. Obviously this points out a distinct cultural difference between the high tech cell phone markets in the US and mobile phone markets in Japan. Apples and oranges. Someday there we will perhaps be a happy medium. I predict that, in the future, most people around the world will have phones that resemble PDAs, and that those phones will become more and more like personal computers, or will at least function like extensions of them. In time, people will come to rely on these devices/phones.

    13. Re:Do we need these features? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I predict that, in the future, most people around the world will have phones that resemble PDAs, and that those phones will become more and more like personal computers, or will at least function like extensions of them. In time, people will come to rely on these devices/phones.

      Are you working for some kind of intelligence organisation or think-tank? Because with predictions like that, you should be. WOAH!

    14. Re:Do we need these features? by corian · · Score: 1

      why does cellphone technology suck so bad in the US

      They use a different phone standard than Japan, so the same phones aren't directly importable. That adds additional development time and cost before the same phones can be avilable stateside.

      Blame Clinton-style trade protectionism and industry over-regulation.

    15. Re:Do we need these features? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm with 'ya, 'cept for the camera part. That I don't give a shit about.

      What I would like is a very simple phone, with a relatively large battery, a large (and very sturdy) monochrome backlit display--with some decent resolution--enough to fit a name or two, and a number, and the ability to play user uploaded MIDI samples (I'd really like to be able to have distictive ring in morse code--mom calls, I get MOM in morse code, I get an SMS, it beeps out SMS)--and a fucking heavy duty vibrator, so when I'm in a loud environment I might actually be albe to be notified of a call.

      ***WITH Bluetooth***, and a largish bit of memory--enough to hold couple hundred or so names and numbers, and a decent database interface. I don't need Java. I don't need a fucking video player. I don't need a camera. I don't need craptastic MP3 ringtones. I don't need a craptastic MP3 player, etc. etc. And I sure as fucking hell don't need a screensaver or desktop picture on my cellphone.

      I want all of the above, and I want it to feel like a chunk of titanium, and be able to be dropped 3 feet onto concrete, and I want it to work perfectly. It should be able to be dragged through the jungle by a bunch of Marines, and sat on by bears. No fucking bugs. No promises of firmware to fix it. It just works.

      Nokia did many of these things in some of their products, but they threw so much in that it's just flaky. Being a jack of all trades will only lead to failure..Unless all of it's features work ***PERFECTLY***.

    16. Re:Do we need these features? by stephanruby · · Score: 1
      And if you want a portable computer..........why not just buy a freakin' PDA?

      My pockets are bulky enough. Even if someone offered me a free state-of-the-art PDA, I'd still use the calendar on my cell, at least if it's on my cell -- it's on me at all times. It's the same thing with the camera. If I had had a camera on me at all times, I could have easily photographed the two drunk drivers that hit and run the parked cars of my neighbors.

    17. Re:Do we need these features? by Naffer · · Score: 1

      3 days? My Samsung a310 gets 1 day. When I have to make high-power analog calls, the phone gets hot and drains the battery in 30 minutes of talking.

    18. Re:Do we need these features? by kryonD · · Score: 1

      3 days?!?!?!?

      I just moved back to the states from Japan and I leave my Docomo D505i on 24/7 and only use it as a PDA (alarm, calculator, calendar, contacts, memo). Despite constantly hammering the battery looking forsignal, I only have to recharge it once every 5 days.

      While in Japan, I took an older N503i out on a military exercise in Hokkaido for 21 days. I spend an average of 45 minutes a day on the phone as the cell phones were more reliable than the military radios and I only had to recharge it once.

      When I picked up a phone here, I finally just gave in and took the free Nokia for signing up with T-Mobile as the closest thing on the market was barely on par with the 2 year old N503i and cost $300.

      The reason why cell technology sucks here is because we all spend too much time bitching on slashdot and not a single one of us has written our congressman expressing outrage that NTT Docomo has been barred from operating here. I could give a damn less if it's to protect the US companies from being driven out of business. "Lead, follow, or get the hell out of the way!" Motorola and Nokia would like you to beleive they are competing...they're not. They're enjoying the fat lazy American consumer attitude that accepts their fast food class service because it is convenient.

      --
      I've dirtied my hands writing poetry, for the sake of seduction; that is, for the sake of a useful cause. --Dostoevsky
    19. Re:Do we need these features? by tarunthegreat2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There is 1 reason behind this:
      1. Ego
      You have about 15/16 different telecom companies with 2/3 major standards all battling it out. Thing is CDMA is essentially an American standard, developed by Qualcomm (I think), and there is no way it would bend over for a European cheese-eating monkey standard like GSM (developed by Nokia and Ericsson, I think).
      Further the mobile phone system here isn't an open or uniform standard like in Europe/Asia. Even with GSM here, y'all had to shift it to a different frequency - 1900 MHz instead of the 900/1800 bands used in Europe/Asia. Your mobile is tied to your provider, whereas in Europe/Asia, buy the phone from anyone anywhere, and simply plug in the GSM chip supplied by the provider you choose. As any slashdotter will tell you, when you use Open and Uniform standards, you get growth and innovation. So this is the unfortunate situation in the US of A. CDMA may be a better standard technically, but GSM is the what the worlds uses. Which is why while most of us are happily MMS-ing, Text messaging is only now becoming a big deal in USA.

    20. Re:Do we need these features? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "They" are obviously making rediculously high-tech geeked-out cellphones for brand name recognition. They're not expecting to make huge profits off of it.

      Cellphone cameras' image quality has room for improvement, though, last time I checked.

    21. Re:Do we need these features? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For example, teenagers might spend $3 on a ringtone because they're looking for a way to establish an identity.

      And we call these people "losers". (Or, on Slashdot, "loosers".)

    22. Re:Do we need these features? by Hast · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually the Vodaphone network in Japan has some compatability with GSM. They have a couple of phones that are "world phones" and can be used with any GSM network. However no-one has managed to unlock one of these phones yet, so you can't use it outside Japan. (Unless you have a japanese mobile phone account, which would be expensive.)

      Besides you can't really blame Clinton that Japan has their own mobile phone system. They are actually worse than the american system because they have multiple phone systems which are incompatible with each other as well as the rest of the world.

      Now that Vodaphone is on the japanese market that may help the situation though. I certainly hope so because I'd much rather get a phone in Japan than here in Europe. I like stupid features like described in this article.

    23. Re:Do we need these features? by thetroll123 · · Score: 2, Funny

      if I want something that just goes bring bring hello, I could just carry a Soviet brick around with me

      In Soviet Russia, the bricks carry you. And they go hello hello bring.

    24. Re:Do we need these features? by Jamesie · · Score: 1

      the Sony Ericsson p900 has a "flight mode" that turns off the phone part. or does it...

    25. Re:Do we need these features? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if your going to carry a PDA

      "you're".

    26. Re:Do we need these features? by ylon · · Score: 1

      You know, while reading your comment I realized something. The mobile phone companies are going to remain more powerful for one key reason: subscriptions. Now, that's not necessarily true in terms of the phone manufactures, yet folks need to keep buying phones that work with their service and the phone manufacturers are basically in a consumable goods market as such. I just had to replace a phone after a year and it seems that that is a trend in mobile phones at the moment. Thus truly the PDA market cannot completely compete with mobile phones since they do not have the same advantages. The markets seem to definitely be on a collision course.

  3. dog bark translater by F13 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Is this for blind people?

    1. Re:dog bark translater by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. It is for men trying to understand the illogical reasoning present in any woman's speech.

      BladeMelbourne

    2. Re:dog bark translater by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course, you can have the future today. At least as far as talking to your dog goes.
      Just get a Bowlingual for your dog.

    3. Re:dog bark translater by Aqua+OS+X · · Score: 1

      No, retarded people. ;)

      --
      "Things are more moderner than before- bigger, and yet smaller- it's computers-- San Dimas High School football RULES!"
    4. Re:dog bark translater by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, deaf people.

    5. Re:dog bark translater by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it's for deaf people!

  4. I can honestly say... by vondo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...that I don't want a phone with any of those features. I want a phone that
    a) doesn't sound like crap
    b) lasts a few days on a charge
    c) functions as a bluetooth access point for my PDA/Laptop
    d) doesn't cost more than $150

    1. Re:I can honestly say... by Three+Headed+Man · · Score: 2, Funny

      I definately agree with you on that. There's no need for all these extra features on a cell phone. Take the camera for instance: you would be better off with a small portable digital camera, unless you're going to a strip club, and they won't let you take a camera inside. They'd never take away your cell phone.

      Another useful (offtopic) thing about strip clubs: give the girls $2 bills; it's dark and they'll mistake them for $20's.

      --
      I'm probably at the karma cap. Mod up a funny troll instead, it lightens the mood :)
    2. Re:I can honestly say... by Deitheres · · Score: 1

      This is a typical slashdot comment. There is nothing WRONG with that, but it's funny because there was a cell phone story earlier today and I read about 25 comments somewhere along these lines. I don't know about you guys (or gals), but I want a cell phone that has all those features listed by Vondo, but also with a ton of bells and whistles. However, I don't like it when my battery dies either.

      The solution? Fuel Cell Batteries! I mean, come on, I've been reading about them for years-- how they're going to give us weeklong battery life for cell phones, and a few days of laptop battery time... why aren't these things hitting the consumer market yet? It will really be the best of both worlds: all the bells and whistles for the "toy" geeks (you know, they're the ones who use KDE or GNOME), but all the battery life required by the "shell" geeks (they sneer at the mention of a GUI).

      --
      Just like driving a car:
      (D) to go forward
      (R) to go backward

    3. Re:I can honestly say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ...that I don't want a phone with any of those features. I want a phone that
      a) doesn't sound like crap
      b) lasts a few days on a charge
      c) functions as a bluetooth access point for my PDA/Laptop
      d) doesn't cost more than $150

      Ironic that you say that, since I bet that 90% of the popualtion doesn't have the faintest clue what a new-fangled Bluetooth access point is. But Dog Bark.. that's just so funny! I have to have that!

      That is the logic that cell phone companies sell to. Although it may not be particularly useful, and it makes the phone more complex and harder to use, and probably reduces battery life, they don't really care, because for the most part, the average consumer doesn't care. Sure, they care about battery life, or sound quality, but not as much as having a phone that can send and receive pictures, a TV tuner, and optical zoom to boot!

      To each his own, I suppose..
    4. Re:I can honestly say... by nacturation · · Score: 1

      Well, the Sony Ericsson T616 (or equivalent, depending on network) does all that and more, except perhaps for your pricepoint. However, if you're willing to get locked into a contract, perhaps you can find a carrier willing to sell it to you for $150 or less.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    5. Re:I can honestly say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about Free? If you get a phone in Japan (even a great color 3g camera phone) that's been out for more than a few months, it's probably a freebie with your contract, or at most $20-30. The latest and greatest model is $200 or so, but the rate of new model releases is so fast that the old ones are dumped for free long before they're obsolete

      If a monthly contract is too expensive for you, you can also easily get "prepaid" phones in convenience stores, etc. These are simple models, usually with color, but no other majot features. They are practically disposable. You use them until your $50 or so of calls is used up and then turn them in or throw them away.

      Like some others say, email on phones is a lot more useful than you'd think. Don't be so sure that you don't need it.

    6. Re:I can honestly say... by Elentar · · Score: 1

      Who on earth would feel good about cheating a pole dancer out of their money? These attractive women are letting you watch them naked or nearly-naked, for only a couple of dollars an hour.

      Too many supposedly educated people treat women like mysterious, illogical animals that can be controlled with the right phrases, gestures, or chemicals. When they can't get a women to sleep with them after dressing nice and buying one dinner, they decide that women must not enjoy sex (after all, logic states that if they do, and he dressed nice, they would go to bed with them!). When a girl actually warms up to them and wants to know them better, they complain about how much she talks about meaningless things...

      I'm not saying that I don't like strip clubs, adult videos, or anything of the stort - They're fun, and when everyone involved is shown the respect they deserve (as human beings), nobody gets hurt. But when people like the parent poster think it's "useful" to try to trick a dancer into thinking she's getting more money, it's simply a sign of of male chauvinism and a complete lack of respect for the woman involved.

      Go ahead, flame me. I wish I could be proud of my profession for having more enlightened thinkers, but from what I can tell there are just as many misogynist geeks as there are sexist auto mechanics.

      -Elentar

      (BTW, think you could configure your phone to auto-dial or auto-answer based on a certain dog bark? That would be cool...)

      --
      The wheel it turns, around and around, with an ancient rumbling sound.
    7. Re:I can honestly say... by Matey-O · · Score: 2, Informative

      Hmph. I just bought a Moto v600. Lasts a week on a charge, bluetooth, GREAT SCREEN, camera.

      It also has the java stuff and plays games and uses mp3s as ringtones and a whole lotta other stuff.

      But it's also a pretty damn good phone for $175.

      My wife sounded like a LOT of you guys: I don't want a damn camera, I don't want a damn color screen....

      Then she IM's me with a link to the V600. Says it's pretty. Likes the 'environmental mood lighting'.

      Some engineer figured that, for another $3, he could put red, green, blue, and white LEDs behind the top and the camera would sell like hotcakes.

      Not because of the camera, or the quadband, or the JVM....but because it's pretty.

      --
      "Draco dormiens nunquam titillandus."
    8. Re:I can honestly say... by Three+Headed+Man · · Score: 1

      Sorry if I came off as misogynistic or sexist; I don't get laid often because I'm doing more important things like posting to slashdot.

      --
      I'm probably at the karma cap. Mod up a funny troll instead, it lightens the mood :)
    9. Re:I can honestly say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      for only a couple of dollars an hour.

      ...I'm pretty sure they do a lot better than that. You may find this informative.



    10. Re:I can honestly say... by MidnightBrewer · · Score: 1

      Japanese phones did all that when I got here two years ago (except the Bluetooth, which came out last year.) They have to add the extra features since they've already mastered the simple stuff.

      And if I trade up my Vodaphone, it will probably cost me either a dollar (depending on whether they're competing with NTT's current offer) or $40, like it did last year.

      However, what I will probably get is one of the international models, so I can use it in any country.

      --
      "Give a man fire, and he'll be warm for a day; set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life
    11. Re:I can honestly say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that the phones in Japan ALREADY have these features - well at least a, b and d are much better than in the US. I was just in Japan and I rented a Vodaphone cellphone at the airport. Worked great all the time, only one place in the city that I noticed it had no signal...

      I think that as such, all the extra features are really the things that will allow customers to distinguish between products, and yes, some of them are gimmicky, but some of them are really useful.

    12. Re:I can honestly say... by Xrikcus · · Score: 1

      But as what you want has been available for years, why not allow more advanced phones now?

    13. Re:I can honestly say... by b06r011 · · Score: 1
      it's funny, but reading through these i see a bit of a pattern.

      someone wants a phone with a good addressbook, another with bluetooth, polyphonic / mp3 ringtones, another with email access, and yes, some of us want cameras too - even if the quality isn't great.

      how do you expect the manufacturers to please all the people all the time?

      you just have to take the good with the bad, and realise that the killer function you want is worthless to someone else.

    14. Re:I can honestly say... by Threni · · Score: 1

      Yeah, in the UK you can get a T610 for free if you sign up for a 14UKP a month contract for 12 months. That's what I've done - it's my favourite phone so far. It also has java, infrared, the Mophun games platform (handy, cos the java implentation isn't so fast), a colour camera, 65k colour screen, decent UI. It's not often people put together hardware/software which I think works well but in this case they have. I'd give in 9/10, and thats just cos the Java doesn't support sockets, so no networked java games, and the cpu (at least, the software in general) could do with being 20-30% faster.

    15. Re:I can honestly say... by Elentar · · Score: 1

      Sure, the girls make more, but you (the viewer) are only paying the cost of a drink or two, or a few bucks when a girl you like is dancing. There are more expensive clubs, and if you pay more you can get more attention, but it's really quite inexpensive normally.

      -Elentar

      --
      The wheel it turns, around and around, with an ancient rumbling sound.
    16. Re:I can honestly say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, your on your desk, you have a VT terminal with a green on black text screen ?

  5. TV Tuner! by imidazole2 · · Score: 1

    Now I can throw away my crappy 3" LCD camping tuner! No more are the days of power going out during one of our Eastern US hurricanes and not knowing whats going on - now that the phone has a tv tuner built in!

    --

    -Imidazole2
  6. 1 year from Japan to US! by vxvxvxvx · · Score: 1

    I guess that means I'm getting 100mbps dsl in 2005?

    1. Re:1 year from Japan to US! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm still on dialup you insensitive clod!

    2. Re:1 year from Japan to US! by JUSTONEMORELATTE · · Score: 1

      I guess that means I'm getting 100mbps dsl in 2005?
      Only if you move to Tokyo
      Joking aside, the $100/mo 100Mbps connections only work because of the population density. Where I live will not see 100Mbps anytime in the near future for anywhere NEAR that price, simply because the infrastructure to support it would cost way too much per subscriber.
      Why nobody is selling at this rate in downtown LA or NYC is a mystery to me, though.

      --

  7. why is the US so far behind? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    American engineers built the first cel phone and have developed the cel phone protocols all these years so why is our system so far behind? Why do Japan, China and Korea get the coolest phones years before we do?

    Oh yeah that's right, while Asian countries spend money upgrading their communication networks, we spend our cash killing Iraqis and building butt pyramids. Thank you George W. Bush.

    1. Re:why is the US so far behind? by Espectr0 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Why do Japan, China and Korea get the coolest phones years before we do?


      Because they are the guinea pigs and the phones get tested there before trying it in the "final" markets. Oh, and also demand

    2. Re:why is the US so far behind? by sych · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It's your regulatory environment.

      While in the USA, multiple different companies went off and developed multiple, incompatible systems (which weren't particularly future-proof), and Telcos even implemented different networks in different parts of the country, the Europeans got together and developed GSM (Global System for Mobile telecommunications), which I'm sure you've heard of by now.

      They actually bothered to implement things like inter-network and overseas roaming, and anticipate the need for an upgrade path for future requirements. They also assigned and reserved radio spectrum across Europe, and much of Asia followed suit.

      Meanwhile, the USA hadn't reserved the same spectrums, so even when US operators decided that the bigger GSM handset market was a good thing to be involved with, handsets from Europe and Asia still couldn't be used because they had to be modified to work on different frequencies!

      It's one case where an unregulated, free and open market has been quite detrimental to consumers, and in fact the whole country.

    3. Re:why is the US so far behind? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's because Japan is a consumption crazy nation with a high demand for toys and underpants.

    4. Re:why is the US so far behind? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because they don't seem to become violent when odd, crazy, or even useless features are added to their electronics. Pocket Pet Mail?!? Onegai! Can't say I ever heard someone retort, "I don't need that!" I'm always amazed at the crazy crap that gets sold and bought in retail electronics stores in Tokyo.

    5. Re:why is the US so far behind? by Erratio · · Score: 1

      I think it's obviously because we're not paying enough attention to what our dogs are saying. They must have valuable technological insights that just remain untranslated in the US.

      I love how the translator is so non-chalantly inserted into the list of features in the review.

      --
      I don't try to be right, I just try to make people think
    6. Re:why is the US so far behind? by jettoblack · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Except that the countries with the most advanced cellphones (Japan and South Korea) are using proprietary and incompatible standards just like the USA did, so your argument doesn't hold up.

      I'm not saying standards like GSM are bad, but if this really was a standards issue, wouldn't we all be ooh-ing and aah-ing over Europe's awesome high-tech GSM phones, instead of Japan's awesome high-tech (insert random 2.5G/3G celphone standard here) phones?

      If anything, Japan has proven that GSM isn't the best technology for densely populated urban areas.

    7. Re:why is the US so far behind? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The US has consistently been used as a testing ground for new phone systems. Once they've been proven, they tend to be used on a huge scale elsewhere, but since there are so many damned standards here, none take a complete monopoly.

      Japans NTT-Docomo uses CDMA 2000, a qualcomm standard that a lot of third world countries like, japan likes, sprint likes, and verizon likes (and a little of nextel)

    8. Re:why is the US so far behind? by Humorously_Inept · · Score: 1
      Actually, part of the reason is also market demand. I work for a major cell phone manufacturer and we've canceled the American versions of numerous advanced phone models because Americans simply don't buy. The American market wants (in order of priority):
      • Flip phones
      • Free phones
      • Small phones
      • Silver phones
      • Camera phones
      We're working on features like *real* internet browsing, streaming video and audio, full PDA functionality, Bluetooth and Wi-Fi, etc. It can all work on existing North American networks, it just doesn't work in the North American market.
      --

      ~Someday, I hope to be an aspiring author.
    9. Re:why is the US so far behind? by Gleenie · · Score: 3, Interesting

      While that's true, the difference is that in Korea and Japan there were a few large companies that spanned large regions or the whole country. And where the companies were regional, roaming onto other regions was neither difficult nor expensive.

      In the USA by contrast, the Bell breakup shattered your industry into a million tiny competing pieces, who all went out and made life as difficult for each other as possible. That of course was the natural conclusion of the court order, which put so much fear of personal penalites (ie, you personally could go to jail) due to anti-trust issues into the company executives.

      Also worth noting that for 3G, both Korea and Japan are following the rest of the world this time round and choosing WCDMA. It's likely that the US will be as isolated in it's 3G standard(s) as it was in 2G.

      --
      -- Your mother uses Emacs.
    10. Re:why is the US so far behind? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the difference between the USA and Europe is that the USA is almost as big as Europe. Add in Canada and Mexico and that's one heck of a cell-phone network. Who needs international roaming when most of your customers never leave a state, let alone the country, or even the continent. It's not that the customers are provincial, it's just that when one lives in a state or province larger than France, it's a big production to travel around to other areas.

      Better to think of the USA as 50 different countries (and several territories) with a lot of things in common. So it's not surprising that Maine has slightly different interests and problems than Arizona. You could say the same for Norway and Spain.

    11. Re:why is the US so far behind? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because Americans don't want to pay for it? These are all international companies, if there was a demand in the US, they could put such a phone to market next month. I have a small phone with OK batteries and a plan where I get free long distance and no roaming in the US, it's $30/month with no initial charge for the phone. Japanese friends have camera phones without long distance, they end up spending $350 for the initial phone, plus $75/month - for normal use, these aren't consultants or whatever. Unless my job specifically required it, I would stop owning a cell phone before paying such a bill!

    12. Re:why is the US so far behind? by jrumney · · Score: 1
      Also worth noting that for 3G, both Korea and Japan are following the rest of the world this time round and choosing WCDMA.

      I don't think following is the word you're looking for.

    13. Re:why is the US so far behind? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "anticipate the need for an upgrade path for future requirements"

      If you knew ANYTHING about the politics of GSM and the 3G fiasco festering in Europe you would realize that your post is one of the most ridiculous I've ever read.

    14. Re:why is the US so far behind? by Gleenie · · Score: 1

      As a matter of fact it is; the WCDMA standards were driven out of Europe just like GSM.

      In fact, the Release 99 3G network is a GSM/GPRS core network with a 3G radio access layer. In the next release, R4, the core begins to diverge from classical GSM. By the time you get to R6 almost everything is completely virtualised, with full separation between control and switching layers.

      Anyway, while Japan and Korea are early adopters (Japan in particular), it's the same crew supplying the gear - Nokia, Ericsson, Siemens, Nortel. There is some NEC stuff in there too IIRC but mainly packet core (SGSN, GGSN).

      --
      -- Your mother uses Emacs.
    15. Re:why is the US so far behind? by Gleenie · · Score: 1

      You could also say the same for NSW (my home state, I'm an Aussie) and Victoria. Nevertheless, all four carriers in Australia cover the whole country!

      --
      -- Your mother uses Emacs.
    16. Re:why is the US so far behind? by jrumney · · Score: 1

      That would be SONY-Ericsson you are talking about? And you left NTT off the list. Most of the original design work was done by them, with Nokia and Ericsson backing it later when NTT had already proposed WCDMA as a Japanese standard. The significance of Nokia and Ericsson's involvement is that WCDMA is now a global standard with a lot of influence from GSM (use of sim cards, ease of roaming), not just a revision of PDC.

    17. Re:why is the US so far behind? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well that and the us is fucking xbox huge and it would cost a lot of money for all of the coverage. in japan and korea and the like they can roll out widespread coverage for the new shit without spending an ass ton of money...

    18. Re:why is the US so far behind? by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

      "While in the USA, multiple different companies went off and developed multiple, incompatible systems (which weren't particularly future-proof) [...] the Europeans got together and developed GSM [...] They actually bothered to implement things like inter-network and overseas roaming, and anticipate the need for an upgrade path for future requirements. They also assigned and reserved radio spectrum across Europe, and much of Asia followed suit."

      Hmm... upgrade path? You mean like the one from cdmaOne to CDMA2000 1xRTT to 1xEV-DO to 1xEV-DV? The one that lets 2G phones work with 3G towers, and 3G phones work with 2G towers, using the same frequencies?

      The free wireless market in the U.S. has not been detrimental to consumers. True, it has taken longer to get to a stable market here than it did in Europe, because Europe mandated a standard at the very beginning. But there's a very strong case to be made that the standards we've arrived upon in the U.S. are superior, and that Europe painted itself into a corner by mandating GSM instead of exploring other options. European 3G networks are now based on the same CDMA technology that GSM advocates scoffed at years ago, but of course GSM equipment isn't compatible with it!

      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    19. Re:why is the US so far behind? by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

      "While that's true, the difference is that in Korea and Japan there were a few large companies that spanned large regions or the whole country. And where the companies were regional, roaming onto other regions was neither difficult nor expensive.

      And what do we have in the U.S. today? A few large companies (Verizon, Sprint, Cingular) that span the whole country. Roaming is neither difficult nor expensive in most cases, thanks to intercarrier agreements - if my phone loses its Verizon signal, it automatically picks up a Sprint signal and I don't pay a cent extra to use it.

      Also worth noting that for 3G, both Korea and Japan are following the rest of the world this time round and choosing WCDMA.

      KDDI in Japan has deployed CDMA2000 1xEV-DO. And look at this (link):

      CDMA2000 dominates 3G today, with more than 64.5 million subscribers, or 99 percent of the global 3G market. There are 78 commercial CDMA2000 networks today and 11 will be deployed within in the next six months in Asia, Australia, Africa, Europe and the Americas.
      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    20. Re:why is the US so far behind? by Gleenie · · Score: 1

      No, that would be Ericsson. Sony-Ericsson is a handset business only. Infrastructure is built by Ericsson.

      And yes, I did leave NTT off the list. They were pivotal in the Japanse acceptance of WCDMA, but were not the driving force behind the standard itself. They have done a lot in carrier-grade linux and integrating that into their network also.

      --
      -- Your mother uses Emacs.
    21. Re:why is the US so far behind? by jrumney · · Score: 1

      NTT were a major driving force behind WCDMA technology. Saying that Japan is following Europe in WCDMA technology is vastly underestimating the input of Japanese companies and the Japanese subsideries of European and US companies in development of the technology. Like other large telecoms companies like AT&T (used to), NTT invests a huge amount into research. They may not produce the products, but they were heavily involved in the design initial stages.

  8. where's the beef? by dAzED1 · · Score: 1
    "the V602SH comes with music playback, video support, 3G graphics acceleration for games, karaoke support, a dog bark translator and weather indicator."

    That's all the more the dark barking thing is discussed. Anyone know more about it? My vet friends would have been greatly amused had there been actual info I could have passed on...

    1. Re:where's the beef? by venicebeach · · Score: 1

      It's probably something like this. A friend of mine has one. Apparently it's not much use for understanding your dog, but the bark recording features can be useful for learning about your dog's vocal habits while you're away.

    2. Re:where's the beef? by josh3736 · · Score: 2, Funny
      the V602SH comes with [...] a weather indicator."

      And now we need our phone to tell us what the current conditions are? Considering that you generally would have your cell phone outside, why can't you just, oh, look up??? If you really need it, have a temperature sensor inside the phone so the cell network isn't flooded with weather data. (Idea! Better patent it!)

    3. Re:where's the beef? by supermarsupial · · Score: 1

      Weather indicators usually display what the weather will be like for the whole day, e.g. sunny in morning, but rain at night.

    4. Re:where's the beef? by dAzED1 · · Score: 1

      you might be inside a building, with no windows to the outside. I imagine that the phone doesn't do temp, humidity, and forcasting itself, it just picks up the equiv to the weather channel.

  9. TV tuner? by boarder8925 · · Score: 1, Insightful
    ...In particular, two phones from Sharp, the V402SH and V602SH between them boast a TV tuner...
    Honestly, who would want to watch TV on a cell phone?
    1. Re:TV tuner? by Oriumpor · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Anyone who has to stand in public transport for hours a day.

    2. Re:TV tuner? by NanoGator · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "Honestly, who would want to watch TV on a cell phone? "

      Somebody who's at a restaraunt waiting to be served. Somebody taking a dump at work. Somebody trying to find out what happened after an Earthquake and all the power's out. Somebody riding the bus. Somebody taking a...

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    3. Re:TV tuner? by maxdamage · · Score: 1

      Somebody who seriously needs to find something better to do... (I don't watch much TV)

    4. Re:TV tuner? by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

      Somebody who doesn't own a GameBoy Advance, or whose viewing habit hasn't adapted to cable yet.

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
    5. Re:TV tuner? by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

      Honestly, who would want to watch TV on a cell phone?

      The same clown who bought a Sony Watchman or a Casio handheld

    6. Re:TV tuner? by josh3736 · · Score: 1
      You could use it Seinfeld style--

      Watch TV while having sex!

      It would have been George's dream!

    7. Re:TV tuner? by RedWizzard · · Score: 1
      ...In particular, two phones from Sharp, the V402SH and V602SH between them boast a TV tuner...
      "Between them"? You mean you have to own both to get the TV tuner?
    8. Re:TV tuner? by lingqi · · Score: 1

      vodafone had a TV-tuner phone for a while now. you might get around watching it in open space, but in buildings and trains it's _very_ flaky, and in subway you can forget about it altogether.

      all the display usits i saw had such shitty reception that the a few clued shops (this even excludes the huge yodobashi-camera in shinjuku) connected the phone to in-house cable which is further connected to land cable or big antenna on top of building with a modified adaptor.

      i wonder why it wasn't a popular sell =)

      i mean, compared to bad-reception tv versus catching up on emailing your buddies / browsing the web (in full colour) on your cellphone, both available for ages, which would you choose?

      --

      My life in the land of the rising sun.

    9. Re:TV tuner? by peachpuff · · Score: 3, Funny
      "Somebody taking a dump at work."

      Yeah, those guys already love the "walkie-talkie" feature. Actual overheard conversation:

      *be-deet*
      "Where are you?"
      *be-deet*
      "Taking a shit."
      *be-deet*
      "Wanna see a movie?"
      *be-deet*
      "Okay, when?"
      *be-deet*
      "Five-thirty."

      I swear, video conferencing will take off when they put it on a cellphone with a built-in wall projector. And people in restaurants will use it to talk to people who are taking a shit.

      --
      -- . . ramblin' . . .
    10. Re:TV tuner? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After an earthquake, If all the powers out, neither the cell phone towers nor the TV stations will be operational.

    11. Re:TV tuner? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Somebody trying to find out what happened after an Earthquake and all the power's out.

      "What happened" is there was an earthquake. Unless you are trained as an emergency responder, you should get to a safe place. You don't need TV to tell you that.

    12. Re:TV tuner? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Honestly, who would want to watch TV on a cell phone? "

      Somebody who's at a restaraunt waiting to be served. Somebody taking a dump at work. Somebody trying to find out what happened after an Earthquake and all the power's out. Somebody riding the bus. Somebody taking a...


      crosswalk full of kids out with an SUV, all because they couldn't be bothered to put down the phone, lest they miss the last episode of "Friends".

    13. Re:TV tuner? by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      Like there isn't a show out there you'd be that compelled to watch.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
  10. Battery Life by fembots · · Score: 2

    in the article, both phones have 2 hours talk, and what happens when users are using the other non-talking functions??

    1. Re:Battery Life by weighn · · Score: 1

      2 hours talk time, 1 hour bark time, 30 minutes of optical zooming, 15 minutes watching the teev should leave about 8 minutes to belt out stairway to heaven on the karaoke. It is beyond a joke. My girlfriend got a samsung phone that takes vga pics. The battery life is dreadful.

      --
      Mongrel News all the news that fits and froths
  11. Japanse dogs? by nmoog · · Score: 5, Funny

    Japanese dogs don't go "woof-woof" they go "wan-wan".

    And cats go "nya-nya"

    Just thought I'd clear that up before you rushed out to buy one for your non-japanese pets.

    1. Re:Japanse dogs? by k4rm4_p0l7c3 · · Score: 1

      and those damned french chickens go 'kuh-kuh-kuhroo!' .. as they drop their bagets and run for the hills.

    2. Re:Japanse dogs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's spelled "baguette", you faguette.

    3. Re:Japanse dogs? by Koutarou · · Score: 1

      And they don't actually hold the pets in quarrantine when you bring them into the country you know. Its actually time for intensive language lessions.

    4. Re:Japanse dogs? by MBCook · · Score: 5, Funny
      It's a dog translator.

      It turns the Japanese dog's "wan-wan"s into "woof-woof"s.

      Why you would want that? I don't know. Now something to turn my French Poodle's "le woof, le woof" and my Mexican Hairless Chiuaua's "el yipo! el yipo!" into a simple "bark bark" I could understand, that I'd pay for.

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    5. Re:Japanse dogs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mexican Hairless Chiuaua's

      would translate to "drop the chalupa."

    6. Re:Japanse dogs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and Japanese phones go "mecha kawaii!!!"

    7. Re:Japanse dogs? by toriver · · Score: 1

      Japanese dogs don't go "woof-woof" they go "wan-wan".

      A can of gasoline an a pack of matches can make any dog go "woof".

      (Yes, I'm a cat person - can you tell?)

  12. Phones that let you see into the future! by Chuck+Chunder · · Score: 4, Funny

    Cool!

    --
    Boffoonery - downloadable Comedy Benefit for Bletchley Park
    1. Re:Phones that let you see into the future! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It says here that you will go blind soon.

  13. I got one of these by Anonymous+Crowhead · · Score: 5, Funny

    Man, my dog talks like a sailor. He's all "get me some fucking dogfood, goddamnit" this and "you best be taking me for walk, shithead" that.

    1. Re:I got one of these by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      My dog talks like a pirate. He's all "Wh3r3 15 d4 fu!1n9 w4r3z d00dz?!?" this and and "W1nd0w5 15 th3 gr347357!" that.

  14. When? by DrugCheese · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    When will we stop calling them cell phones and call them something else? Seems more and more the phone features aren't the main selling points.

    --
    *DrugCheese rants*
    1. Re:When? by Deitheres · · Score: 3, Funny

      Well several alternatives have been proposed, such as:

      Cellular Relaying Antenna Point (CRAP)

      and

      Aggregate Nesting Node of Outrageous Yuppies and Ignorant Goofballs (ANNOYING)

      and

      Standardized TDMA Focusing Umbrella (STFU)

      However, all these names were rejected by focus groups. The first two were classified as vaguely insulting (although the respondents could not quite say why). The respondents also said that STFU made them feel like they had made a stupid post on slashdot (kind of like this one....)

      Please note that I am (obviously) not a professional creator of acronyms.

      --
      Just like driving a car:
      (D) to go forward
      (R) to go backward

    2. Re:When? by Gherald · · Score: 1

      > When will we stop calling them cell phones and call them something else? Seems more and more the phone features aren't the main selling points.

      Customer: "I need a camera with optical zoom that has a TV tuner, a virtual karaoke machine, and dog bark translater. Oh yeah, and it would also be cool if it could send and receive phone calls on cellular networks and have SMS capabilities...."

      Um, no. Sure, the non-phone features are useful selling points for marketing, but the reason the customer is buying the device in the first place is to fucking send and receive calls.

      There is no reason to change the "cell phone" name.

    3. Re:When? by DrugCheese · · Score: 1

      No reason to get testy.

      Sure, people still buy the phones to talk on them .. like they were phones ...

      But what about the new handheld game device from sony which can also send recieve cellular phone calls, is it a cell phone with gaming capabilities , is it a game device that can make cell calls? Where is the line drawn? And who draws it the marketting department?

      --
      *DrugCheese rants*
    4. Re:When? by NailedSaviour · · Score: 1

      I don't know about the rest of the world but here in Australia we call them "mobiles" which seems fairly succinct and to the point. That is all.

    5. Re:When? by Jamesie · · Score: 1

      talking devil box?

  15. 2005? by sych · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Hold on, we're almost half-way through 2004 already, they're not even out in Japan yet; the USA still hasn't managed to convert to GSM let alone UMTS or any other 3G standard, there's probably a tonne of localisation to do, and you're expecting to see these things worldwide in 2005?

    You must be joking, right?

    1. Re:2005? by Stopmotioncleaverman · · Score: 1

      You['re] (must be) joking, right?

      That's what Kyle Katarn said. About a million and four times in Jedi Academy. And he's a freaking Jedi. So he must be right.

      It's not gonna sell. The Jedi have spoken :)

    2. Re:2005? by spacefrog · · Score: 1

      I have a CDMA2000 phone, so yes we do have 3G service. It isn't perfect, but knowing what my cost per minute is (both for me and the originating caller) as opposed to what my friends in Europe pay....I'll keep it.

      If I travel outside the country, I can rent a phone and forward to it if I so desire.

      The 144K data service is not perfect (latency is high, and the speed varies) but it is *very* cheap. Being able to surf and get on IRC while I'm passenger on car trips rocks.

    3. Re:2005? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they're not even out in Japan yet;

      Wrong. The ability to watch TV on a cell phone in Tokyo has been available for at least a few months.

    4. Re:2005? by sych · · Score: 1

      when I said that they were not out in Japan yet, I was referring to the particular handsets mentioned in the article.

      But I take your point about like features being available on other handsets. I still think we're not likely to see them 'worldwide' as early as the writer suggests.

    5. Re:2005? by Jack+Porter · · Score: 1

      Maybe if, instead of just saying how great it is, you provided useful information such as where you live, what phone model and what provider you use, someone might mod you Informative.

    6. Re:2005? by CowboyNick · · Score: 1

      I am not the grandparent poster but I have a Kyocera 7135, travel extensivly across the US and the 3G service seems to work just about everywhere. The latency is kind of a pain, but it's still very usable. It's much better than an analog dialup line anyway. My carrier is Verizon.

      --
      -CowboyNick
  16. The do everything machine by maxdamage · · Score: 1

    What happened to the predicted shift from the do everything machine to the seperate single purpose machines. I would never get a phone like this. My phone is the standard green screen motorola, not because I cant do better but because I have a PDA and because I have a digital camera.

  17. Linux cell phone? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    Why can't a cell-phone be a small Linux machine that can double as PDA, camera, GPS, etc? That way we could put whatever software on it we wanted, have USP-like connectors, and customize it. A standardized platform is needed to spark something.

  18. Dream I had a year and a half ago by BlueJay465 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Technology has been evolving at a rapid rate. Consumer grade cellphones had been blended with actual camcorders and were able to record and transmit at 1080i over the airwaves. The video calls were amazing. They were still quite a bit more bulky than the ones you have in your pocket, due to the extra features and they had more of a shape of a camcorder. There seemed to be a lot more vigilante news reporting at this time too, and there was a lot more chaos in the world.

    Maybe the time I saw in my dream is closer than I thought.

    Mod me offtopic if you feel necessary, I think it quite in context.

    1. Re:Dream I had a year and a half ago by Deitheres · · Score: 1

      I feel kind of like a Karma whore for bringing this up, but your post reminded me of the characters in Snow Crash... I can't remember what they were called, was it gnomes? They went around and just recorded stuff... I think that there is a real possibility that we may be headed down that road-- especially as our privacy is slowly eroding because of technology being used against us. It seems only a natural evolution that people will begin to use pervasive technology in ways like what you describe.

      --
      Just like driving a car:
      (D) to go forward
      (R) to go backward

    2. Re:Dream I had a year and a half ago by Snad · · Score: 1

      I can't remember what they were called, was it gnomes?

      Gargoyles, I believe.

    3. Re:Dream I had a year and a half ago by Deitheres · · Score: 1

      Ah yes! It has been a long time since I've read that book. Was I correct about their primary purpose? If I recall, they were kind of an indy media organization of sorts-- kind of like hitmen reporters for hire?

      --
      Just like driving a car:
      (D) to go forward
      (R) to go backward

    4. Re:Dream I had a year and a half ago by BlueJay465 · · Score: 1

      I will elaborate further since it was by far the most lucid dream I have ever had, and probably one I will never forget.

      A lot of the vigilanteism had stemmed from the continued abuses that governments had put upon their citizens with surveillance (read traffic cams, RFID, etc.). The breaking point was when nano-surveillance was introduced full-scale. Countless numbers of microscopic bugs with cameras relaying their info back to a central authority. You literally couldn't go anywhere without being watched, even in your own home. Citizens finally had the tools in consumer grade goods to be able to fight back against the governments, and it was a culture war like nobody had ever seen before.

      Everything on computers was to the point that they had become wireless in every way...the keyboard (these still haven't gone away yet), mouse, monitor, cpu, even the power was wireless. What had changed little though was the protocols that everything was communicating with each other. n'th generations of Wi-Fi and Bluetooth were still driving communications. Everyone had some sort of gadget on them, not so much as it made any kind of statement to have the most uber gear, but out of necessity to keep up with the events that were unfolding around the world.

      After I had woke up I wrote down as much as I could. One theory i had is that I had seen the 'sign of the beast' within some of this advanced technology. I am still not sure as to how much of this is true, but I have my suspicions, since the sign I saw wasn't anything anyone was expecting or even on the lookout for. This would certainly explain a lot of the religious uproar.

      Other than that, a couple of the more cool techs I saw were Polymer TV and Nano-pen computing. Polymer TV had about the thickness and consistency of a mousepad, but could be stretched and distorted to fit in almost any environment. Kids loved to poke and prod at the images to watch the shapes change. (perhaps we are not too far off from this one either). Nano-pen computing was the current type of mobile-computing and had computers based inside of pens that you could turn on, and a stream of nano-cells would come from the pen in a smoke-like substance and form a screen that felt like saran-wrap that you could use in mid-air. You could point and click with the pen and be able to do about as much with as you could with the regular computers. If you lost any cohesion and some of the cells and they drifted away they were dirt-cheap to replace and could be found in almost every shop.

      Whether all of this was merely a dream or a twisted vision of the future, I may never know until that day arrives.

    5. Re:Dream I had a year and a half ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, aliens have been fingerfucking us in the ass for decades now. This is nothing new.

  19. caution! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Chuck Chunder is a known carmel whore!

    1. Re:caution! by sharkdba · · Score: 1
      Chuck Chunder is a known carmel whore!

      carmel?

      ispell returned these suggestions:
      0: camel
      1: caramel
      2: Carmela
      3: Carmen
      4: carrel
      5: cartel
      6: car Mel
      7: car-Mel
      Which will it be?
      --
      The purpose of life is to find the purpose of life.
  20. "Dog bark translator"....?! by Mmm+coffee · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I know this is off topic, but if you haven't spent enough time with your dog to know what he/she is thinking, feeling, and expressing without a fscking dog bark translator, then you're probably a crappy 'parent'.

    Right now my dog (Jenny) is laying on the chair next to my computer desk with her head propped up on the arm, staring at me with one ear perked straight up. That clearly says "You're supposed to be petting me instead of browsing Slashdot, you moron." Just learn how to speak dog, it's cheaper and more rewarding.

    1. Re:"Dog bark translator"....?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Knock knock
      Who's there?
      Your dog.
      Your dog who?
      Your dog's dead.

    2. Re:"Dog bark translator"....?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or learn how to speak cat, then you don't need a smelly dog around the house.

    3. Re:"Dog bark translator"....?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you describe your relationship with your dog as parental than perphaps its time to seek some human company.

    4. Re:"Dog bark translator"....?! by sharkdba · · Score: 1

      If you describe your relationship with your dog as parental than perphaps its time to seek some human company.

      No, he's right. A dog's brain is similar in development to a 2yo human. Of course it's not a human and you cannot treat him as such, but you would be surprised at the similarities in behavior.

      --
      The purpose of life is to find the purpose of life.
    5. Re:"Dog bark translator"....?! by normal_guy · · Score: 1

      Why is everyone so offended by what is obviously a joke game on a cellphone? To use the parent analogy, it isn't like the phone reminds you when to hug your kids.

      --

      Linux: Free if your time is worthless.
  21. with a bit of luck, we WON'T be seeing these by neurojab · · Score: 4, Interesting

    >with a bit of luck we'll see these features in worldwide mobiles sometime in 2005

    correction: with a bit of luck, we WON'T be seeing these features in worldwide mobiles EVER.

    Whatever happened to the engineering concept of affordance?

    Portable phone: The ideal one is really portable and really a phone. Make it small, light, have the battery last forever and never lose calls. I'll buy that one. Keep the dog translator, thanks.

    1. Re:with a bit of luck, we WON'T be seeing these by NanoGator · · Score: 3, Funny

      "I'll buy that one. Keep the dog translator, thanks. "

      I hope you don't consider yourself a geek.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    2. Re:with a bit of luck, we WON'T be seeing these by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I consider your mom a whore with a filthy ginch.

    3. Re:with a bit of luck, we WON'T be seeing these by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "I consider your mom a whore with a filthy ginch."

      Hope you feel good making fun of a guy's mom who just went through surgery to remove cancer.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    4. Re:with a bit of luck, we WON'T be seeing these by Patik · · Score: 1

      You can have an affordable phone easily. Just buy an old one. Once these cameras hit the right price point, the phone you want (simple and small) will be dirt cheap because they're no longer cool. This is how all electronics markets work.

    5. Re:with a bit of luck, we WON'T be seeing these by logic-gate · · Score: 1

      I assume you are talking about perceptual psychologist's J.J. Gibson's concept of affordance as the interaction between an object's capabilities and an organism's ability to take advantage of them?

    6. Re:with a bit of luck, we WON'T be seeing these by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I learned something today. I learned that getting gangbanged in alleys gives filthy ginched whores cancer. I hope the surgeon put his penis in the incisions. That bitch will die soon and leave you nothing but a syphillis soaked condom.

    7. Re:with a bit of luck, we WON'T be seeing these by Ctrl-Z · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but then it becomes impossible to find the phone you want because they will all have cameras in them.

      On a related note, does anyone know where I can find a 101-key USB keyboard with a built in USB hub without any Internet/audio/doodad buttons on the top? Apparently such a product does not exist. I'd also accept a 104-key model that I can pop the Windows keys out of.

      --
      www.timcoleman.com is a total waste of your time. Never go there.
    8. Re:with a bit of luck, we WON'T be seeing these by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      Heh. Trying a little too hard, dontcha think?

      --
      "Derp de derp."
  22. bark translater by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Maybe they need to install a spelling checker too.

    --
    Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
    1. Re:Bark Translater by zolon · · Score: 1
      Ohh sorry, did my comment about evening having a girlfriend insult the lack of ability you have in finding one?

      Bark a little louder, I don't think my phone caught that fully.

      Sin

      Yes, I know, don't feed the troll

      --
      Merf
    2. Re:Bark Translater by rice_web · · Score: 1

      Bark translator? Don't you mean dog translator?

      --
      The Political Programmer
    3. Re:Bark Translater by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop trying to be funny. That's why you don't have a girlfriend anymore. Well, that and your scab covered penis. If you want to be funny, I suggest you kill yourself. It would be funny when you finished what your hate filled mother started years ago.

    4. Re:Bark Translater by zolon · · Score: 1
      What I don't understand, is how you feel the need to insult people when you can't even do it with out posting anonymously.

      Guess that's what happens online with alot of people, they lose their balls and have to hide.

      By the way, come to Seattle, meet my current girlfriend, so she can kick your ass.

      Good day.

      sin

      --
      Merf
    5. Re:Bark Translater by zolon · · Score: 1
      I just relized how pathic this troll has made me become. Some one who has the power, please delete my responses to him. I withdraw, let him win in his little mind.

      sin

      --
      Merf
  23. Motorola a1000 & e1000 by wantknowledge · · Score: 1

    Personally I think the a1000 and the e1000 from Motorola appear to be better phones. "...full HTML browsing with Opera. It also boasts an impressive array of multimedia functions, including an integrated 1.2 mega pixel camera (with 4x zoom), video and audio streaming, capture and playback with MPEG4 and MP3 files, and dual-audio speakers." The e1000 contains slightly less wizbang features but includes AGPS.

    1. Re:Motorola a1000 & e1000 by ahecht · · Score: 1

      Ahh, but that 4x zoom is a digital zoom, which is worthless. You can get better results by enlarging and cropping in Photoshop.

    2. Re:Motorola a1000 & e1000 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh I didn't realize that. I change my mind the phone's are obviously worthless.

  24. What??? by nizo · · Score: 2, Funny

    No builtin fork and cheese grater???

    1. Re:What??? by JonnyQabbala · · Score: 0
      No builtin fork and cheese grater???

      Well at least you can get a Bottle opener

      --
      This sig intentionally left blank
    2. Re:What??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No no not these, your thinking about the next generation Swiss Army knives, they're knives/forks/cheese graters with extra features like mobile telephony and cameras, they'll probably out soon :)

    3. Re:What??? by evilviper · · Score: 1
      No builtin fork and cheese grater???


      Why in the world would you want a fork grater?
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  25. Optical zoom by slash.dt · · Score: 1
    This ties in nicely to the story yesterday about cellphone camera tricks

    Camera phone tips

    Having an optical zoom in the kaitai will certainly improve the photo quality considerably.

  26. "Glimpse of the Future" by allanc · · Score: 1

    Did anyone else read the headline to this article and hope, briefly, that the Japanese had invented a picturephone that could see through time?

    --AC

  27. Less is More by Shakrai · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They actually want to make a regular computer inside the cell phone.. I actually want a cell phone that can be heard everywhere, with a nice battery and perhaps send pictures and such (which can already be done).

    I don't even want that much. Was with you until you said pictures. All I want is a phone with a good battery life and a decent address book. I don't mind a few other features (such as a calculator or a few simple games like Tetris to pass the time if I am stuck at the airport) but they had better not murder my battery life or distract me from the main features of the phone.

    My Kyocera 2325 suits me quite nicely. The address book is superb (I love the auto-dial feature where it matches letters that I type to the contacts book -- can call my GF by typing in "788" or my boss by typing in "726" -- that's the coolest speed-dial feature I've ever seen -- much nicer then a list of speed-dial numbers that need to be remembered), the SMS interface is sleek enough and it has the calculator mode that I desire. The battery will last about three days even with fairly heavy usage (I am landline free so I make all my calls on the cell) -- what more could you ask for? Sometimes less is better.

    --
    I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
    We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    1. Re:Less is More by Rai · · Score: 1

      I can sympathize. I own a Nokia 3300, Nokia 3595, and Motorola V400. After a signifant trial period with each, I now use the 3595, which though it has less features, is the best performing, most durable, and easiest to operate.

      However, I do want a Nokia 6820 if they are ever available for Cingular GSM service.

    2. Re:Less is More by cilix · · Score: 1
      I don't even want that much. Was with you until you said pictures. All I want is a phone with a good battery life and a decent address book. I don't mind a few other features (such as a calculator or a few simple games like Tetris to pass the time...

      You see. This is the "problem". He wants a phone and a camera, and you want a phone and a couple of games. Other people want other things. How does a phone company accomodate that? They put everything in. I think it makes perfect sense personally. It's just a matter of having an interface that doesn't force features on the user.

    3. Re:Less is More by Jade+E.+2 · · Score: 1
      can call my GF by typing in "788"
      Hmmm... 7... 8... 8... PQRS... TUV... TUV...

      The only female name I can come up with from that is RUT, as in Ruth. Other than that, I guess she could be named Stu...

    4. Re:Less is More by thetroll123 · · Score: 1

      can call my GF by typing in "788"

      7="P/Q/R/S" 8="T/U/V"

      788... "RUT"?

    5. Re:Less is More by v_1matst · · Score: 1

      er... or maybe they could be her initials?

  28. TV tuner useful? by zakezuke · · Score: 1

    I'm not saying that a TV tuner isn't cool, those Sony Watchmen from the 80's were most spiffy among other portable TV products. However broadcast programing is very much limited... typicaly ABC CBS NVC UPN WB and PBS can be picked up on rabbit ears. I hardly ever turn in to any of the above except for news. Cable telivision carries most of watch I watch on a regular basis, making such feature pretty much useless to me.

    Now a radio tuner on the otherhand I would find much more in the way of useful when out and about.

    --
    There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
  29. Dog translator? How about a phone that works?! by willith · · Score: 1

    I'll skip all of those features, thank you. I work for a government contractor and we're not even allowed to bring camera-equipped phones into the building without a permit anyway.

    No, what I'd rather have is a tiny flip-phone that I can slip into my watch pocket. My Samsung A-530 is good, but I wish it were tinier. I don't want four hundred annoying ringtones; I don't want downloadable games at $2.50 a pop that I have to use my minutes to get; I don't really even care for a color screen. Make it small, make it last two or three days on a single charge, give it a high-contrast display that's easy to read even in sunlight, make sure it's got a phonebook, and make it sound nice.

    In short, I want a phone. That's all. Is it so much to ask for a cellular phone that functions as an efficient communications tool? I don't want to take pictures on it--I have a camera for that. I don't want to listen to MP3s on it--I have an iPod for that. I don't want to play games on it, either. All I want is to freaking talk on it and have at least a resonable chance of my call not being dropped or sound like I'm talking to Gorgo the Swamp Monster because of crappy signal strength.

  30. Bark Translater by zolon · · Score: 2, Funny
    Wait a momemnt. Does this mean I can finally understand what the heck my ex was saying?!

    (( Yes, this was a poor attempt at humour. ))

    Sin

    --
    Merf
  31. Galapagos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone read Kurt Vonnegut's "Galapagos"? I swear that these things are beginning to sound like that little machine they had.

    What was it? Mandorax or something like that?

    1. Re:Galapagos by Nspace13 · · Score: 1

      close, just a spelling error really, it was "Mandarax" and the early version one was called "Gokubi"

      --
      steal this sig
  32. I wish US phone were built as tough. by dbleoslow · · Score: 2, Interesting

    After spending 3 years in Japan, I was disappointed at the build quality of US phone when I returned. Anyone who's used a Japanese mobile phone will tell you they are built to hold up much longer than the ones in the US. I feel like if I drop my US cell once, it's a goner. I banged my JP phone up alot and it's still going strong.

    Forget adding features, add some better plastics!

    1. Re:I wish US phone were built as tough. by ecantona · · Score: 1

      US scumbag companies want you to break your phone so you have to buy another one so they make more $$$.

      --
      I don't have a sig.
    2. Re:I wish US phone were built as tough. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      What "US scumbag" company manufactures cell phones? Nokia is European, Sony Ericsson is a Japanese-European hybrid, LG is Korean I think... Motorola is American but that's the only one I can think of. You think these companies only want US customers to break their phones? Please. US phones feel fragile because US customers don't care, so manufacturers don't need to spend more on a phone's ruggedness. It's not some evil corporate conspiracy against the US. If fragile cell phones were a major customer complaint, design changes would happen, but as of right now it doesn't factor in when an American goes to pick out a cell phone.

    3. Re:I wish US phone were built as tough. by Neo-Rio-101 · · Score: 1

      I've nearly broken my second Japanese cell phone now. Most of the problems have been the damn things snapping in half from being sat on in my back pocket.

      Both phones I have broken are the slab type designs. They get a small bend or crack in the middle and they're goners.
      The clam-shell designs are clearly better suited to not snapping like a kit-kat.

      --
      READY.
      PRINT ""+-0
  33. Features by uspsguy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    My only question: does it actually make usable phone calls?

    --
    Profanity - The sign of a small mind trying to express itself.
  34. Very Disturbing by Turismo86 · · Score: 0

    I definitely read virtual bukakke machine when I first read the article. Maybe its time to turn off the porn and go outside for a bit.

  35. These phones don't have enough gadets... by tsunamifirestorm · · Score: 1

    I prefer the ones mentioned here...
    http://www.themq.com/index.php?articleid=45&issue= 102
    p.s. how do you make it an actual link?

    1. Re:These phones don't have enough gadets... by maxbang · · Score: 2, Informative

      <a href="urlhere">link text</a>

      --
      I also reply below your current threshold.
  36. Most requested features by platypibri · · Score: 2, Funny

    1. How about a phone that doesn't drop calls? 2. Maybe eliminating dropped calls. 3. I'd also like a phone that doesn't $@%#$&* drop calls!!!!!!!!! Um, the battery thing too.

    --
    Yeah, I guess I'm funny like that.
    1. Re:Most requested features by MBCook · · Score: 1
      Don't you get it man?

      THEY don't want you to complete your calls!

      By constantly dropping your calls, you give up and don't use your phone, so the battery seems to last longer. It's all a big scam. The man doesn't want you to know how pathetic the battery life is.

      But I'll tell people the TRUTH man... and the truth is th)@*%/.% [NO CARRIER]

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
  37. phones are replacing PCs by bhny · · Score: 2, Insightful

    in japan, for some kids the phone is their pc. they don't email they send text messages, they browse the web on their phone.

    it's not obvious in the U.S. with our backwards cell phones, but in other parts of the world people are buying phones instead of PCs

  38. What a waste by reynolds_john · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Phone manufacturers (and software developers) are keeping the price of these silly things artificially high.

    Back in the late 90s I heard from a developer that Nokia told them at a conference that they *could* make cell phones that updated themselves over the network; they don't because they want cell phone turnover on the rate of about one a year.
    The service still sucks at times, and the stuff they add on just simply doesn't justify the insane prices you pay. Think about it - $150 for a good new phone, and (average) $60 a month for a decent plan.

    That's $870 a year for a PHONE.

    Price for a regular home phone, $150 a year, maybe $200 if you add on a good long distance plan. And unlike your cell, the home phone is good for life (we just threw away my grandfather's phone that he got from AT&T in the early 60s).

    Perhaps I'm the anomoly, but I want quality service, long battery life, and a decent menu system (are you listening, Motorola?) over every other feature they come up with.

    Just my 2 cents.

    1. Re:What a waste by BugZRevengE · · Score: 1

      In Australia, things are different....
      Regular home phone: $30/month ($360)plus calls
      Mobile $25 a month($300) includes $25 calls with a free phone, which has lasted 3 years.
      I make about $25 worth calls a month on the mobile, and about $10 a month on the landline... if it was not for the ADSL needing land line, I would ditch it.

      --
      Why me? Why not!
      BACKUP YOUR PARTITIONS
    2. Re:What a waste by apdim · · Score: 1

      Well in Europe (at least in Greece), if you have a plan every year you're given a new phone. Yes you're given a new phone for free every 12 months (or 18 depending on the plan). Granted, you have to choose among the baseline models available for that year but you can upgrade paying the price difference. That's why every family in Europe has an average of 5 mobile phones.

    3. Re:What a waste by killjoy966 · · Score: 1

      The thing with mobile technology is that (thoeretically) you can make a phone call from anywhere at any time which just isn't possible from a land line. It may not justify your estimated $670 per year jump in price but you do have to expect it to be more expensive. With added convenience comes added cost.

      --

      Sigs are for suckers.

    4. Re:What a waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Communist!

      Our whole way of life is based on the notion that people will buy any shiny piece of crap that gets shoved under their noses, regardless of price, provided that a marketing campaign tells them that it will make them more attractive and interesting if they do so.

      And do you know why? Because corporations rule the world now. Were it not for them, we'd still be travelling by horse and eating food that could only be grown locally and bought in season.

      So bow down before your corporate masters, worm! And don't you dare utter the BLASPHEMY that useless techno-toys aren't desirable! We owe our way of life - nay, our very lives - to the great and powerful manufacturers of shiny gadgets.

      I HAVE SPOKEN!

    5. Re:What a waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $60/month for a decent plan? I think few non-consultants would spend anything near this - are you on your cell phone for hours every work day?

    6. Re:What a waste by boots@work · · Score: 1

      And that's only about $200/yr in real money! (Finally, one thing that is cheaper in Australia than the US.)

      Anyhow, just because they ship phones with new features every year doesn't mean you have to upgrade. I have a 3.5yo Nokia which is small, friendly and works well. Who cares that it doesn't have a camera? Spend the money on a real camera.

    7. Re:What a waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Well, in Japan, I've got a cell phone that takes pictures, has a full color screen, internet access, c-mail (chat, SMS), e-mail, and does movies. All for free. The phone cost nothing. The plan is 3000 yen a month plus 3 yen every min beyond the included minutes. Best part is that all incoming call are free.

  39. In Japan, cell phones take place of cheap PDA by DB_researcher · · Score: 3, Interesting

    In Japan, these high-end cell phones are just used as PDA by young people, because these cell phones are not so expensive ($50~$100), and have basic communication mechanisms (phonic and e-mail) and web-browser. For most Japanese, cell phones are not only phonic communication tool but also necessary informational equipment.

    In such situ., there will be "cell-phone-geeks", and want more complicated functions, like dog-human translater or tv, no doubt.

  40. And your phone offers a glimpse of something else by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    The future is mobile porn where you can get a glimpse of Gina and her friends.

  41. Similar to parenting by Deitheres · · Score: 2, Interesting

    As a pet owner, I agree with you. I can't say I have children, but it seems to be the same way. I mean, when my cat is being bitchy, he either needs food, water, or attention. I don't need a translator to tell me that. I have seen some products that claim to translate the cries of a child. I imagine that there is/could be a market for a product like that, but that is a saddening prospect. Your child is crying. Gee, maybe he/she is hungry, needs a new diaper, or just plain misses you. Do you need a translator to figure that out? It seems to me that the world is moving away from a "hands on" approach to parenting (either a child or a pet), and these things maybe are not so obvious anymore. If you're getting that quality time (and yes, you can have quality time with a pet), you don't need a dang cell phone to translate anything for you.

    If you are going to build translation capabilities into a cell phone, why not make it something useful, like japanese to english and vice versa. I would certainly appreciate something like that, even if it only worked for basic phrases. Put an SD slot in there, and you can switch out the language cards when you are going to a different country!

    --
    Just like driving a car:
    (D) to go forward
    (R) to go backward

  42. you say this because you havn't seen it by lingqi · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The Sharp models have very nice displays that boast 640x480 resolution on a 3" screen. you have to realize that people use it for email / web browsing (well, maybe more mail than web for vodafone service) more than they use their phone for a phone, since calls are so expensive comparatively.

    it also comes with 2mpix digital camera, which, coupled with the screen, is a very nice treat.

    the phone isn't too expensive when you factor in the various contract-length discounts. It comes out to be less than 200USD for the top of line vodafone has to offer, and consider how much a slim 2mpix digicam alone would cost you, i don't think it's a terrible price.

    comments on the article is that, though: isn't this kind of old news? vodafone TV has been around for like half a year now and the reception isn't terrific - especially, erm, on subways; the pet-emotion-translator has also been about 8 monthes or so if not longer. it's an add-on 32MB SD card software package, though, so didn't try it.

    phones with digicams that comes with optical zoom was probably first seen on one of the earlier model panasonic FOMA phones (for NTT docomo) and that was like two years ago.

    hmm, but maybe i'm just spoiled bathing in the abundant supply of unnecessary toys readily available in japan.

    --

    My life in the land of the rising sun.

    1. Re:you say this because you havn't seen it by vondo · · Score: 1
      hmm, but maybe i'm just spoiled bathing in the abundant supply of unnecessary toys readily available in japan.

      Yup.

    2. Re:you say this because you havn't seen it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nigga can you read?? I mean.. this nigga took the time to jot down point for point what he wanted and you're talking about tv's and cameras and shit..

  43. Klingon Dictionary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here! I have a copy and I can speak, erm, very broken Klingon, and I know phrases that have no use in the real world. Nevermind. The dog translator is a better idea.

  44. Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now, if only they could figure out someway to use this device to "call" other devices and "talk" to the people using those devices. Almost like a "portable phone" system.

  45. Battery life? by kuzb · · Score: 2, Interesting

    With all these additional features getting strapped on to phones, they must be coming up with some unique new battery solutions.

    I wonder if it would be too much to ask for a cellphone that *just* made calls and lasted a really long time between charges. I think I could safely trade in the dog bark translator for that.

    --
    BeauHD. Worst editor since kdawson.
    1. Re:Battery life? by apdim · · Score: 1

      > I wonder if it would be too much to ask for a > cellphone that *just* made calls and lasted a > really long time between charges. I think I could > safely trade in the dog bark translator for that Sure there are, see Nokia. Sure the have some with color screens/cameras etc.. But they know how to make a hell of a good basic phone, and they still have a lot of basic "just a phone" stuff in their line. Most of their phones last over a week with some approaching 2 weeks on a single charge. See Nokia 6310, 6510 , 3100. If you want even more basic, they've got the perfect phone for you: Nokia 1100 with up to 17 days of battery life.

  46. Translator: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    *Bark, Bark, Bark!*

    Translator: Send money to sharp. Pleaseeee?

  47. In Japan, we already do by achurch · · Score: 2, Informative

    . . . in a way, at least. The Japanese term for "cell [mobile] phone" is technically keitai-denwa, but in reality, everyone except NHK news announcers just says "keitai" (pronounced KAY-tie). While the origin of the word is obvious, I think it's fair to say that "keitai" represents the conglomeration of features that have been squeezed into these devices more accurately than "cell phone" does.

    1. Re:In Japan, we already do by Nasarius · · Score: 1
      While the origin of the word is obvious

      Is it? Could you please clarify for those of us who don't know a damn thing about Japanese? :)

      I know English, German, and just enough Dutch, Italian, and French to get around, but Asian languages scare me.

      --
      LOAD "SIG",8,1
    2. Re:In Japan, we already do by achurch · · Score: 1

      I was just referring to how "keitai" comes from "keitai-denwa" ("mobile phone"). Hopefully that's clear enough. (:

    3. Re:In Japan, we already do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "keitai" (pronounced KAY-tie)

      Well, more like keh-ee-tah-ee, but if you say it fast enough, it'll sound like kay-tie, only with punchier vowels thanks to the extra syllables.

    4. Re:In Japan, we already do by achurch · · Score: 1

      Well, more like keh-ee-tah-ee

      Actually, no; "ei" is pronounced as a long "e", not as two separate vowels. So the first syllable is actually "softer" than e.g. the "ay" in English "kay".

    5. Re:In Japan, we already do by randyest · · Score: 1

      First, you mean "long a" (as in "pAY") not "long e" (as in "pEE.")

      Second, my wife, who is Japanese, says you're wrong. It's more like keh-ee-tah-ee like the AC claimed. Here's her typing now (she doesn't have a /. account):

      There are four syllables in the word when written correctly. When spoken informally, especially among young people, "ee" has weakened recently, turning "keh-ee" to just "ke-eh". It's like long "keh," with "ee" sound almost dissapearing. I suspect that's where achurch's comment came from. But in correct, formal Japanese, there should be "ee" between "keh" and "tah."

      Just FYI.

      --
      everything in moderation
  48. Re:Dog translator? How about a phone that works?! by duren686 · · Score: 1

    What you're looking for is the LG TM250/VX3100. It's tiny, sounds decent, and theoretically has up to 240 hours of standby time, although I've only managed to get three to four days on a single charge out of the stock 950 mAH battery that it comes with. I don't feel like dropping money on the extended 1500 mAH battery, but there is one available if you desperately want to make your phone last for a week on end without charging. My only gripe is that the ringer's sometimes hard to hear among background noise, even on full blast.

    --
    Y2K Compliant since the late 1890s
  49. GOD I WANT TO HACK ONE ! by MajorDick · · Score: 4, Funny

    I would give ANYTHING to hack a series of those ala Barbie Liberation Front style. Change the "dog-bark" translator so it returns all kinds of EVIL and RUDE translations, like "Im going to eat your throat out in your sleep" and "Hah I pissed in you shoes" etc etc.

    Way back when in early 95 my dad was running Win95 beta or RC , I gained remote access, installed and shared a folder that I then uploaded all kinds of 2001 a space odyssey WAV's to his system and replaced the default sounds. My Dads name was Dave, so it was friggin perfect, instead of the shutdown sound it would go into the "Dave, What are you doing Dave" sequence and so on, about 10 sounds in all.

    ANYONE stupid enough to USE a dog bark translator deserves anything I can make it say.

    1. Re:GOD I WANT TO HACK ONE ! by rytier · · Score: 1

      hehe you could try Red dwarf as well...
      "everybody's dead, Dave... comes to my mind"

      --
      --- Naive inside, foolish outside...:)
  50. Simple. by TechnoFreek · · Score: 2, Funny

    Cell Phone. Cellular Telephone. Cellular PDA-Gaming Platform-Calendar-Planner-Universal Remote-Translator-Dictionary-Infrared Scanner-Laser Pointer-RC Probe-Camera-Swiss Pocket Knife-Movie Projector-Telephone? I sure hope I didn't forget anything.

  51. Those phones are even cooler in the flesh by Gleenie · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I work at Vodafone NZ; we've dealt with our Japanese colleagues on a few occasions relating to 3G. They brought their phones with them. Way cool. Some of that technology is filtering down to the 2G phones being manufactuerd by the likes of Sharp also.

    Interesting was the speed with which they were able to roll out 3G sites: thousands of cells per month. Unlike us their 2G system is completely incompatible with WCDMA so they had no concerns with radio or core interoperability - and thus they were able to rollout at an unheard-of speed. Kudos to Vodafone K.K. They have been remarkably successful!

    --
    -- Your mother uses Emacs.
  52. Re:Dog translator? How about a phone that works?! by achurch · · Score: 1

    Is it so much to ask for a cellular phone that functions as an efficient communications tool? I don't want to take pictures on it--I have a camera for that. I don't want to listen to MP3s on it--I have an iPod for that.

    On the other hand, some of us don't feel like carrying lots of separate devices around. If I want really nice pictures I'll take my camera--but if I just want to grab a quick snapshot of something I can use my keitai. If I'm going to listen to music for hours on end I'll use my MD player--but if I'm just trying to pass time on the train I can use my keitai. I don't see these "multi-function phones" as entire replacements for other devices, but simply as added conveniences; don't worry, the manufacturers haven't forgotten about call quality. (Well, most of them . . . *cough*Panasonic*cough*)

  53. Captain Obvious on the Tech Front by Mulletproof · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "Japanese Cell Phones Offer a Glimpse of the Future"

    Um, the Japanese cell phone market has been providing glimpses into the future for quite a while now. They are regularly on the bleeding edge of industry technology. Freakin' duh, man.

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
    1. Re:Captain Obvious on the Tech Front by Timothy+Chu · · Score: 1

      Not just cell phones, but all means of technology. Have you seen the kinds of robots they have over there? The ones that are captained from a cockpit inside the head of the 6 story-high transforming bot? Why haven't we got any of that?

    2. Re:Captain Obvious on the Tech Front by Mulletproof · · Score: 1

      Have you seen the kinds of robots they have over there? The ones that are captained from a cockpit inside the head of the 6 story-high transforming bot? Why haven't we got any of that?

      Because they can only be piloted by 15 year old japanese kids with some form of mental angst....

      --
      You need a FREE iPod Nano
    3. Re:Captain Obvious on the Tech Front by dakryx · · Score: 1

      No just japanese kids, what about Asuka?

    4. Re:Captain Obvious on the Tech Front by Mulletproof · · Score: 1

      Ok, fine. They just need to speak japanese then. AND have mental angst. That's a must.

      --
      You need a FREE iPod Nano
    5. Re:Captain Obvious on the Tech Front by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      "Hey! Quit thinking in Japanese! My eva is configured for German! Oh, fine, I'll switch it..."

      Paraphrased from Neon Genesis Evangelion.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  54. my article on the same phones by zmcnulty · · Score: 1

    Just in case anyone was interested. I don't have more information really, but I do have more pretty pictures. Article is here.

  55. Re:Dog translator? How about a phone that works?! by apdim · · Score: 1

    Two or three days on a single charge? Men, I don't know what kind of phones you have in the US but my last 3 phones were able to do at least a week on a single charge. 3-4 days was the standard 5 years ago but now anything under 6 days standby is considered major drawback. For the record that is about phones sold in Europe, I guess Japan people don't care so much about that.

  56. Correction. by Deitheres · · Score: 1

    "Aggregate Nesting Node of Outrageous Yuppies and Ignorant Goofballs (ANNOYING)" should read
    Aggregate Nesting Node of Outrageous Yuppies and Ignorant Nonsensical Goofballs (ANNOYING)

    The first would actually be "ANNOYIG" which the focus group respondents said sounded far too similar to someone who had a cold.

    --
    Just like driving a car:
    (D) to go forward
    (R) to go backward

  57. Re:phones are replacing PCs, but not Macs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're right. In Japan, they buy a Macintosh. Some of the best case mods on the Internet were from Japan, and on Apple PowerBooks.

  58. Very straightforward by obeythefist · · Score: 1

    Orig- "Woof!"
    Translation- "Hey!"

    Orig- "Woof."
    Translation- "Give me steak."

    --
    I am government man, come from the government. The government has sent me. -- G.I.R.
  59. I'm such a luddite... by Rick+Zeman · · Score: 1

    ...getting a phone that....merely makes phone calls. No camera, no ring tones, no games, no color, no translators, no nothing....
    I'll never be able to buy another of those again. :(

  60. By western standards, it's still pretty advanced by api_syurga · · Score: 1

    ....

  61. Dog Bark Translator? by lildogie · · Score: 1

    Woof woof. Woof woof woof. grrrrr.

    Huff huff. Huff huff huff. grrrrr.

  62. I know people have already post this but... by Fiz+Ocelot · · Score: 1
    I just wanted to say it. Please just make a nice phone, just a phone! I want it to be very clear, great reception, and awsome battery life! I DO NOT want a damn camera/dog bark translator! I do not want flashy lights and annoying ringtones!

    It's not complicated, really. Someone needs to do for cell phones what Apple did for MP3 players!

  63. talks to dogs, why not to my other computers? by twitter · · Score: 1
    I wish that the thing would sync with Korganizer and my Zaurus' PIM packages. I know, fat chance. Woof, Woof, I'll just keep entering my phone numbers in by hand each time I change cell phone providers and am forced to buy a new $UGLY_VERBing phone. The postman already knows what the dog it telling him.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  64. I hate to be the one to point out the obvious.... by Deitheres · · Score: 1

    kitchen sink.

    --
    Just like driving a car:
    (D) to go forward
    (R) to go backward

  65. PARENT IS _NOT_ OFF-TOPIC by JessLeah · · Score: 1

    I am getting SICK of mod abuse. This is ridiculous. The parent was ON topic.

  66. Now we can all be Timmy. by psoriac · · Score: 4, Funny

    Woof Woof!

    What's that Lassie?

    Woof!

    Hold on girl let me take out my cell phone!

    --
    I browse Slashdot at +3, Funny
    1. Re:Now we can all be Timmy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Translating . . .

      I want you to follow me.
      I think she wants us to follow her!
  67. Blatant karma whoring by Cid+Highwind · · Score: 1

    The gargoyles wore gear the recorded everything they saw, heard, sensed, etc for publication in "the library" (originally the Library of Congress). They would get paid if someone downloaded their recordings later. Some of the freelance hackers (including Hiro, I think) resent the gargoyles for clogging up the library with too much useless data.

    --
    0 1 - just my two bits
  68. I don't want phones to have these features by egburr · · Score: 2, Interesting
    How many incredibly annoying features do they have to cram into these phones?

    Yesterday, a phone at a table near me announced very loudly to the entire restaurant "You have an incoming call!" over and over and over again. It took the guy forever to figure out how to answer it.

    What do I want in a phone?

    Limit the annoyance capabilities (volume, music, etc.)

    Let me have two or more phones share a single phone number. It has got to be possible, but nobody will do it. That's the only missing feature that makes me think back fondly about my old land-line phone. If someone wanted to reach whoever picked up first, or leave a message for whoever checked first, they only had one number to call; now they have two (me and my wife) and have to leave a message for both if neither of us answer. And soon half our calls will consist of "sorry, he's not with me; try his mother (or father) instead".

    Let it be an option to create a blacklist of numbers (including "unknown") which will NOT generate a ring at all.

    Let me hit END to drop an incoming call unanswered so I can place an outgoing call immediately instead of having to wait for the incoming call to eventually shunt over to voicemail.

    Get three-way calling working better. I have had 5 different models of phones in the past 4 years, and NONE of them has handled three-way calling well at all.

    Let me choose between color and black-and-white for the display. I never had any trouble reading the B&W display on my older phones at a quick glance. With this color display on my new phone, I have to shield it from the light, even at max contrast, and stare at it for a few seconds just to read the clock which is in larger numbers than everything else.

    Make data cables available. I should not have to go to the store and stand in line for half an hour praying that when I get to the end of the line and ask to have my phonebook copied out, that their computer isn't down, that their cable isn't broken, that their software isn't misbehaving, that the person I get actually knows how to perform such a simple task, etc.

    Make the equipment consistent. Every time I upgrade (mainly due to loss/damage) my phone, I have to get a new charger (usually included), new car charger, new headset, new data cable (if available!), new belt clip/holster, etc. And I use the term "upgrade" loosely, because out of all the phones I have had, I still like the first one best. If that model were still available, I would keep getting it, but unfortunately being 4 years old it is obsolete.

    --

    Edward Burr
    Having a smoking section in a restaurant is like having a peeing section in a swimming pool.
    1. Re:I don't want phones to have these features by Vegeta99 · · Score: 1

      With GSM service, if I hit "IGNORE" (same as END on some phones), it's sent directly to voicemail, and I can even have a separate message for it. IE, usually my voicemail says "You've reached Rob. I'm unavailable, please leave a message and I'll get back to you.", but hitting the Ignore button says "Fuck off. I don't want to talk!"

  69. All very well and good but..... by cabjoe · · Score: 1

    Can you make phone calls with them?

    --
    If I hadn't seen such riches, I could live with being poor.
  70. Just an irrelevant tidbit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They have a mood translator at petsmart stores that will supposedly give the dogs mood, based on how the bark sounds.

  71. Lesser is More by JD-1027 · · Score: 1

    You had me up until Tetris. I just want a phone with a number directory.

    Ok, who's next? Anyone not want a number directory?

    1. Re:Lesser is More by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      You had me up until Tetris. I just want a phone with a number directory.

      It's not a requirement -- just a nice thing to have. My old Nextel i700plus was complete bare bones -- but they went too far. The contact book on that phone was a POS (max length of a contact name was like 15 characters) and the interface was a bitch. I've used a ton of cell phones and the 2325 is the best one I've come across -- for what I use it for anyway.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
  72. Glimpse of the future? by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 1
    Since when is Japan on a differnet planet/alternate universe. Don't answer that with "tentacle manga".

    Anyhow, um, wouldn't the future be now, in Japan?

    For the record, I would like my phone to be a phone. I could give a rat's ass about the other stuff.

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
    1. Re:Glimpse of the future? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      For the record, I would like my phone to be a phone.

      Well that's the level of the struggle in the US at the moment. Japan got past that some years back so the current struggle is on a somewhat higher plane.

  73. us stupid old farts.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... with transceivers and independent power will be able to commo just fine though.....

    sumthin to be said for old reliable technology sometimes....

  74. Glimpse of the future by bigsteve@dstc · · Score: 1

    If it could just tell me the result of the first race at Eagle Farm next saturday ... :-)

  75. Whats the point? by dude127 · · Score: 1

    Whats the point of putting more features in a cell-phone when the keys are too damn small to use any of them? I have enough trouble with a regular keyboard let alone on a miniscule key-pad where my thumb covers four keys.

    The only reason why these "everything but the kitchen sink" phones are so popular in Japan is because they have such small thumbs.

    Maybe if they integrated these phones with a better input device, like a laser-keyboard perhaps, then they might actually be useful.

    http://www.brighthand.com/article/iBiz_Releasing _V irtual_Keyboard_Soon

    Of course, even with one of these I still wouldn't buy one. The screens need to be bigger too :)

  76. Other Vodafone Japan 2.5G & 3G models by Bushcat · · Score: 2, Informative
    You can see other Vodafone Japan models here.

    Sharp model numbers begin or end in SH. Sanyo in SA. Toshiba in T. NEC in N. English-language PDFs of the manuals for several models are also available.

    The review didn't mention the 800 series: 801SH and 801SA.

    Other goodies: the 601T has T4G 3D accelerator and a TV output jack when playing games. 401D also has a 2MP camera. The 401SH needs a really good signal for TV, and it kills the battery. The 401SA and 801SA have the same type of body sliding mechanism to reveal the keypad, all the others flip.

    The latest Sharp models, including the 801SH, have electrical and optical audio, so one can rip direct to the SD card. Unfortunately it's DRM City, so getting music onto the SD card via a computer involves Panasonic's awful SD Jukebox software and one of a small number of card readers.

    The 801SA can place videocalls to similar handsets. The 801SH and 801SA use W-CDMA in Japan, and tri-band GSM when roaming internationally.

    Finally, the VC701SI is a 3G modem card made by Seiko.

  77. Why do you care? by shidoshi · · Score: 1

    I never understand why, when we hear about new cellphones with these fancy features, people get so riled up and speak of them as if they were the devil. If you don't want one, guess what? Don't buy one! There are plenty of crappy old phones with nothing but a monochrome display and no features but an address book. Don't say that there aren't, because I see plenty of them whenever I go to look at cell phones.

    Some of us, however, DO want things like this. I'd love to have a cell phone that has a camera inside of it that can better the actual digital camera that I have. That way, if I want to go somewhere and have both my phone and a camera, I can take one handy little item instead of two. If I have a phone that can also play music or get TV reception or play games, should I want to, why not? I don't want a big, bulky PDA, but I do want to ability to do a number of things in a small package.

    If you enjoy carrying eight different pieces of technology with you somewhere, go right ahead. I, however, eagery await the day I can have different things at my disposal, should the need or desire come up, all wrapped in one small, easy to take with me package.

  78. The coolest freatures I've seen comes form S.Korea by iustus · · Score: 3, Interesting

    When I go home to the U.S. on leave, I recognize most of the American cellphones are really korean, only about one to two years behind. Last February I showed some friends my SKY Slide phone and they said "wow, yeah, my sisters getting that one next month" or "hey I was looking to get that one after my current one", then I told them that I purchased mine a year ago, second hand. Well, it good to finnally know we're finally catching up.

    Anyway, here the public transportation system is very good, so everyone has an all in one bus/subway card. The best feature yet has been the cell phone that acts as one of those, where the person takes thier cell phone out, waves it in front of the subway entrance gate, and it subtracts from thier phone bill.

    Its not hard to see where thats going. . . regardless of any stupid features like cameras or karaoke, mp3 players etc. . . its easy to imagine someone instead walking up to a counter at 7-11, the cashier ringing up what you order and then you just pay by waving your handphone in front of a little reader.

    --
    Saying "Militia really just means National Gaurd" is like saying "Press really just means PBS"
  79. Ha, not likely. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "You're supposed to be petting me instead of browsing Slashdot, you moron."
    Just learn how to speak dog, it's cheaper and more rewarding.
    The parent poster is clearly lying. He is posting on Slashdot, but yet he claims that he has a girlfriend, that she wants him to "pet" her, and that he understands what she's talking about.
  80. Sheesh. Less distortion, perhaps? by mudshark · · Score: 1

    I know I'm not the first to say this, but JEBUS folks, how's about a really kick-ass cell phone that's ONLY A CELL PHONE?

    Good power, great reception, superb audio (my pet peeve: earpieces that crap out when they're a week or two old -- can someone please put a better transducer in there?), long battery life, high contrast displays, well-thought-out menus and UNIVERSAL CHARGERS AND DATA CONNECTORS!!!

    No? Thought so. Fsck it all, we'll have to keep getting inundated with all this toy-of-the-month shit. The march of progress appears backward from a utilitarian perspective.

    Maybe, just maybe, one savvy manufacturer will notice this market and start building durable, functional JustaPhones.

    --
    In other news, astrophysicists have announced that they now know what all that dark matter is: it's stupidity.
  81. Amen by sjb2016 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I was in Japan for 10 months last year. I bought a middle of the road JPhone (now Vodaphone) model that has a camera, 10 secs of video, internet, e-mail, and an amazing alarm clock for about $30 (US)(had discounts). The best part was, I didn't even have to sign up for a year contract. I could do post-pay and not sign up for a year, how novel is that? I refuse to buy a cell phone in the States (or anywhere else I may live) unless I can buy the phone I want but not have to sign up for a year.

    The stupid contracts and poor handsets (relative to Japan anyway) are really a function of the youth of the cell industry in the U.S. Here, market saturation is low and demand is high, so companies have tons of consumers willing to pay huge amounts on crap contracts and horrible handsets. In Japan, where something near 80% of people have a cell phone, the companies must offer better phones and contract options to steal customers away form competitors. Ah, the free market at work. But what do I know, I use a Mac.

  82. QVGA, not VGA by ahecht · · Score: 1

    The phones only have a 320x240 display (same as a PocketPC, but smaller), not 640x480. Still, I have to admit, that high a resolution on such a small screen look absolutely gorgeous.

  83. Wow! by killermookie · · Score: 1

    Supposedly, in their next upgrade you'll be able to actually make phone calls.

  84. QVGA is for video by lingqi · · Score: 1

    hmm? vodafone V601SH is the precessor to V602SH and it has 640x480 (actually 480x640 technically), i'd be damn surprised if the new model doesn't sport the fanciness.

    QVGA is the size of the video you can take with it, not the brilliantly beautiful screen's size.

    --

    My life in the land of the rising sun.

    1. Re:QVGA is for video by Kusunose · · Score: 1

      V601SH has QVGA (320x240) lcd and not VGA (640x480).

      See News release on V601SH.
      - Large-size 2.4-inch QVGA (320 x 240 pixel) System LCD screen for brighter and clearer viewing

  85. Practical Features: by cryptochrome · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Let it replace all the other electronic devices you have on you. Like:

    1) A LED flashlight. So handy, so simple.
    2) Built-in usb plug letting it operate as a combination modem and flash drive. Of the generic variety, so you don't need to install special software to use it as such.
    3) AM/FM/Weather radio. Keep up with news and sports.
    4) Civilian band walkie talkie. Generic analog or smarter digital, with encryption. If it can use bluetooth, it is already capable of using the right frequencies.

    Please add your own ideas...

    --

    ---If you can't trust a nerd, who can you trust?

    1. Re:Practical Features: by ichimunki · · Score: 1

      As to #3 I already have the internet on my phone, so I can keep up with news and sports pretty easily with that. I can even send real email and use AIM if I want.

      I love the USB idea though-- every device that has digital storage should have USB and a plain HD interface, imho (or a removable card, like SD or CF). I would very much like my phone to store data in XML and allow me to offload and upload via USB (and I suppose for Windows users some software could be downloaded from the maker's web site to help modify the XML or make it work with Outlook, etc).

      --
      I do not have a signature
    2. Re:Practical Features: by spare.dave · · Score: 1

      A lot of the newer phones in Japan already have a built in flashlight. Not amazingly strong, but enough to be useful.

      And I keep a weather site as the first item in my bookmarks. I find it quicker than waiting for a radio forecast.

    3. Re:Practical Features: by Thuktun · · Score: 1

      3) AM/FM/Weather radio.

      Well, FWIW, my phone (Nokia 6800) already has an FM radio, though inexplicably you can only use it if you attach a headset, it won't play over the built-in speakerphone.

  86. Keitais by chrome · · Score: 1

    I'm so sick of the clam-shell keitais. I want non moving part phones like the infobar! I nearly bought an infobar but didn't like its low-rez screen or the fact it had not english capability.

    I can handle a japanese OS on a phone, but I prefer to use english.

    Clamshells suck - they break easily, are heavier than all-in-one designs etc. Blah!

  87. [OT] Pronunciation by achurch · · Score: 1

    I'm also fluent in Japanese (according to many native Japanese acquaintances), and I say your wife is out of touch. (: Probably 80% of the "ei" in "keitai" I hear is the weakened variety, which as far as I'm concerned makes it the "standard" pronunciation. Though granted, that could have more to do with the fact that "ke-tai" (think in katakana here) is the "in" spelling these days.

    (And yes, I should have been clearer that that was a long Japanese "e", not an English one.)

  88. Odd by NeGz · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I've noticed it a few times before, and others may have pointed it out. But anyhow...

    I can easily see someone like my dad subscribing to the "it's just a phone, all it should do is let me send and recieve calls" opinion, which is, of course a perfectly valid one.

    But geeks? Slashdot Geeks!? I mean, features like dog translators are obviously useless crap, but don't geeks (like myself) normally like their tech things to get bigger (smaller), better and faster? Even I use an old Ericsson T39m (calls, address book, bluetooth/IrDA, WAP, email, SMS) and I don't feel the need to upgrade.

    Perhaps there's some kind of inbuilt geek mechanism that doesn't trigger for mobile phones but does for PDAs, notebooks, MP3 players, PVRs, etc. :) (Or perhaps it's because the later are often targeted at us, whilst the prior is not.)

  89. I hope.. by oddbudman · · Score: 1

    Is it called "Station"?

  90. Fuck that, I want longer battery life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But that won't bring revenues now will it...sigh.

  91. Interesting. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    And funny in a way. I can imagine a cellphone being a status symbol in a Sudanese village, or Eskimo Igloo, but nowhere else. It's as if somebody proclaimed a toaster as being only for the wealthy elite or something.

    Here in New Zealand way back in the mid-to-late-80's, a cellphone cost as much as NZ$15,000, and you needed a friend to help you carry it. But since the early-90's, everybody in New Zealand has become a cellphone owner; every school kid, every housewife, every truck driver, etc. It hasn't been an executive status symbol here for a long time.

    In fact at one point a few years ago it was chic to be cellphoneless, as if that conferred an above-everybody-else kind of status. But everybody in the country is so used to having instant telephone access, almost no matter where they are, that few are without one.

    1. Re:Interesting. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's why people buy a top of the range piece of crap with more functionality that you'll ever need. The same as people buying sports car to do the weekly shopping...

  92. not really the future by jeff+munkyfaces · · Score: 1

    for japanese people is it now..

  93. Basics? by smcdow · · Score: 1
    ... a TV tuner, camera with optical zoom, virtual karaoke machine and dog bark translater (woof woof) ...

    Hmm, wonder if you can use them to make phone calls.

    How about a cell phone that just does telephony... what a concept! I'd buy that!

    --
    In the course of every project, it will become necessary to shoot the scientists and begin production.
  94. Obligatory Monty Python reference by Kap'n+Koflach · · Score: 1

    A Hungarian tourist (John Cleese) approaches the clerk (Terry Jones). The tourist is reading haltingly from a phrase book.

    Hungarian: I will not buy this record, it is scratched.
    Clerk: Sorry?
    Hungarian I will not buy this record, it is scratched.
    Clerk: Uh, no, no, no. This is a tobacconist's.
    Hungarian: Ah! I will not buy this *tobacconist's*, it is scratched.
    Clerk: No, no, no, no. Tobacco...um...cigarettes (holds up a pack).
    Hungarian: Ya! See-gar-ets! Ya! Uh...My hovercraft is full of eels.
    Clerk: Sorry?
    Hungarian: My hovercraft (pantomimes puffing a cigarette)...is full of eels (pretends to strike a match).
    Clerk: Ah! matches!
    Hungarian: Ya! Ya! Ya! Ya! Do you waaaaant...do you waaaaaant...to come back to my place, bouncy bouncy?

  95. Um.... so? by Kjella · · Score: 1

    "Japanese Cell Phones Offer a Glimpse of the Future"
    "French Fashion Shows Offer a Glimpse of the Future"
    "CEBIT Tech Gadget Shows Offer a Glimpse of the Future"

    Well, doh. They've been doing that for a long time, all of them. So it's not news because it's not news that it is news? I found it interesting to see what the near future in cell phones is. If you haven't noticed, time passes. The "glimpses into the future" aren't the same glimpses as two years ago. That's why this is news, not that they offer "glimpses into the future" per se.

    Kjella

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  96. Getting these is the US? by bobthemuse · · Score: 1

    Is there a way to get these in the US, besides Ebay? Any Japanese companies that will buy them locally and ship them to you? Would this work on our data networks?

  97. 3G Network in DC, but no phones! by michaelmalak · · Score: 1
    In DC, Verizon offers a 300-2000 kbps wireless cell network (not Wi-Fi), yet the only hardware offering is a laptop card! I want the equivalent of a Sony Ericsson P900 that is compatible with this 1xEvDO network, and maybe a Treo-style thumbpad too. Meanwhile, I've had to pick up a Nokia 3650 (unlimited but slow Internet; video recorder with sound) for negative $50 to tide me over until a 3G phone is available.

    I want broadband, not TV. When are business execs finally going to figure this out?

  98. losing market share by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    According to a recent article in (I believe) the WSJ (and a DowJones newswire article yesterday on DoCoMo) DoCoMo/Vodafone are losing market share in Japan because KDD is killing them with their CDMA2000 offering. DoCoMo is projecting a loss this year because of lost wireless market share.

    I've read similar articles that CDMA450 is killing them in other markets (E. Europe and possibly South America.)

  99. BETTER Cellphones by Geoff-with-a-G · · Score: 1

    I don't begrudge anyone their crazy new features. If you want to play Splinter Cell, or watch TV, or take pictures, or check the attenuation of Cat 5 cables. But I want a better PHONE.

    I mean I want an earpiece with good volume, which fits comfortably against the ear, and a connection over which I can speak clearly without distortion or delay. I personally use Verizon Wireless, but I don't think I've ever spoken to anyone on their cellphone, regardless of their carrier, and had the quality be near landline quality. I'm not an expert at the wireless signaling technology involved, but I would assume that there is some way to improve signal quality, though obviously at some cost. All I'm saying is that I'm willing to put my money into that cost, rather than into a digital camera, web-enabled, voice-recognizing gadget. I can get that from an actual digital camera or a PDA. I want a friggin' cellphone that works like a normal phone.

    1. Re:BETTER Cellphones by scighera · · Score: 1

      Get a GSM mobile then. I use T-Mobile and find the quality to be just as good as landline under good signal conditions (granted, if you are on the fringe of the network, you are going to get some digital static).

      GSM's EFR and AMR vocoders sound much better to me than CDMA's EVRC or SMV. They don't make the S and C sounds sound dulled and they tend to have a better tonal range. And well they should. The GSM codecs don't compress as much because after a certain point, there isn't much reason to for a GSM carrier (unlike a CDMA system where there are definite benefits to the carrier to compress voice as much as possible.) Also the CDMA vocoders have questionable background noise supression built in which, to me, just tends to make the user's sentences sounds choppy at the beginning and end of their phrases.

      CDMA is great and all from a whizbang technology perspective but IMO, the benefit is really for the carrier and not the consumer. On a GSM system (which uses TDMA for the air interface), each user is allocated a definite amount of bandwidth that is locked to that user until the termination of the call. The caveat is that if there aren't open timeslots on a tower handoff, your call gets dropped. Also, if there aren't any open timeslots at all, you get a "network busy" error when trying to initiate a call.

      CDMA systems conversely do soft handoff so there aren't as many dropped calls. (I rarely have dropped calls with GSM in Chicagoland though.) However, the caveat with CDMA is that everyone uses a pool of ether. Bandwidth can be allocated dynamically and as more users come on to the system, voice quality goes down as less and less ether is available to each user (read: the system's ability to accurately recover each user's signal is reduced). So the carrier gets a capacity gain (more users for less towers and spectrum) but the voice quality tends to suck in the process.

  100. bye bye 3G by boy85 · · Score: 1

    What is gonna be fun is the instant messengers with VoIP in the phone-pda-combinations with wlan capabilities. Its gonna kill 3G.

  101. You say this because you don't know me by duggy_92127 · · Score: 1
    you say this because you havn't seen it

    Actually, no. I agree with the grandparent post: I ACTUALLY WANT a phone that is just a phone. Text display in low-rez, low-power black and white; good sound, good mic, good reception; small size with no moving parts. That's it. Nothing else. Should last a week or more on one charge with light usage.

    That is, in fact, what I want. You can show me all the gadget-phones you like, but I just want the above feature-set, please and thank you.

    Doug

    1. Re:You say this because you don't know me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      So fucking buy one. They exist.

      Why do you OMG I DONT WANT THAT ITS TOO MUCH types have to post on every bloated product release, christ.

    2. Re:You say this because you don't know me by duggy_92127 · · Score: 1
      So fucking buy one. They exist.

      I have, thanks, and I'm quite pleased with it. I was merely reponding to the guy who thought that, if I were to only SEE this particular device, that I would, in fact, lust after it. He was incorrect, and I thought it might be useful for him to have that pointed out.

      Doug

  102. japaneese culture is weird by brusstoc · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I want my phone to be a phone and nothing else.

  103. blind man, his dog and a bark translator? by krumbs · · Score: 1

    Is this for blind people?

    this is an interesting question - i can imagine a blind man and his dog crossing the road, while the phone translates the barks into simplified versions of "look out, here comes a truck" or "damn, there goes a cute bitch. wish i was not on a leash stuck with this man and his fancy phone!"...

    errr... hold on. for a blind user, won't the phone also need some kind of a bark-to-human-voice conversion? also AI good enough to figure out the difference between a wuff wuff and a woof wuff? not to mention, an articulate dog who isn't the canine counterpart of our mumbling slyvester stallone?

  104. Nokia 7700? by Dakkus · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Well.. The Nokia 7700 will be introduced withing a month or two. It'll include a TV receiver, a camera, and mp3 player. To name a few things. The best thing is it's running Symbian, which is already a big operating system for cell phones. As it's widely used, you also get many programs for it. You can also code your own programs for it at least with C++, Java and Python. So, the Japanese aren't actually that much far away from us.

  105. What I would like to see in a cell phone... by cr0sh · · Score: 1
    Not that I would buy one (when I am away from a phone, no one can contact me - I am a free man, not a dog on a leash), but still...

    This would be limited by battery technology (and may be why it hasn't come to fruition - or only prototype level, if that):

    You would have an "earpiece" that would be a combo of the receiver speaker and a small tube (or no tube?) microphone - it would "clip" over your ear or maybe fit right in your ear. Battery to power the audio and bluetooth (or similar tech)...

    The receiver/transmitter would fit on your wrist, not much bigger than a watch, with a small screen - showing numbers, status, etc - this would house the actual "phone", and also serve as a watch and simple PDA. If you could throw a camera in, fine (if you could integrate it into the earpiece, facing forward, even better!). It would wirelessly communicate with the earpiece via bluetooth.

    Basically, a phone that is always there, always with you - low beeps could alert you when you had a call coming in (no disturbing others with the ringing), both hands are free to do other tasks (typing or writing).

    I know this isn't a new idea by far - prototypes and such have been shown by various manufacturers, and similar stuff has be "designed and worn" at some "wearable fashion shows" for a long while. I just wish battery technology (or whatever is holding it all back) would catch up...

    --
    Reason is the Path to God - Anon
  106. Consider the market by 0utRun · · Score: 1

    People, you're talking about Bluetooth and wireless integration with this and that -- do you think the average 14 year old Tokyo high school girl (who can sell her underwear for 50$) gives a rats ass about Bluetooth?

  107. From Japan, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We Japanese will never buy these fxxkin' phones.
    Almost people in Japan think so, because of
    wanting mobile phones be more simple as
    a real "phone" and a email&web client,
    and more excellent designs like Nokia are needed.