Slashdot Mirror


Fiber To The Dorm Room

alertpopes writes "Looking for a great education AND a dedicated personal fiber internet connection in your dorm room? Students enrolling at Case Western Reserve University in Cleveland, OH get both! Just don't bring any 10/100 equiptment - it's gigabit only around here. All students have access to over 16,000 fiber ports throughout the university plus 802.11g campus-wide! Registered students must buy a Netgear GC102 Gigabit Ethernet Media Converter through the University eStore for a mere $216.50 to connect to the service, but isn't it worth it? CWRU recommends the purchase of either a Dell or Apple for incoming students to meet networking requirements. The University was voted the 'Most wired Campus' by Yahoo! Internet Life magazine in 1999."

447 comments

  1. Over-wired? by ThogScully · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Sounds like most over-wired. I would hope they could allow students to connect for free with all they saved by running fiber only and no ethernet. They should have budgeted in for students to get all they need to connect though. I'd be annoyed if I had to buy more equipment to connect my machines there, only to accomodate bandwidth I'll never realistically utilize.
    -N

    --
    I've nothing to say here...
    1. Re:Over-wired? by Trigun · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'd be annoyed if I had to buy more equipment to connect my machines there, only to accomodate bandwidth I'll never realistically utilize.

      Get out. You're not welcome around here.

    2. Re:Over-wired? by jargoone · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Completely agree. It sounds like they ran fiber to all the dorm rooms just so they could say, "Hey! Look! We have fiber run to all the dorm rooms!". Or maybe they have an agreement with the bookstore and manufacturer of the "media converter".

      What's wrong with copper?

    3. Re:Over-wired? by WindBourne · · Score: 4, Funny

      Actually, it makes a lot of sense to do this. Unfortunately, they can now only afford a t1 connection to the internet. I guess that will solve the mp3 problem though.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    4. Re:Over-wired? by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      * I'll never realistically utilize.*

      or even will be able to without the network admins kicking your sorry ass from the network.
      hell, by now they could've provided the 1gbit with normal cheapo ethernet parts in most buildings probably.

      how about wireless?

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    5. Re:Over-wired? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately, they can now only afford a t1 connection to the internet.

      Umm, I'm pretty sure that they have a dedicated OC-12...

    6. Re:Over-wired? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      As a former CWRU undergrad I will agree that Case has always been 'over-wired' in order to score well on technical reviews. They have had at least one (sometimes two) fiber lines to each dorm room for almost a decade now. However, you suggest that Case has bandwidth I'll never realistically utilize. Believe me, the network gets well-used, and I have pushed the limits on a daily basis. True, a basic hard drive cannot write as fast as the network can transmit data...but that is why so many students like myself made striped raid arrays to be faster than the network!

      Believe me, downloading a 700 MB movie in 20 seconds is a dream.
      -Sparky

    7. Re:Over-wired? by evil0ne · · Score: 2, Informative

      What about wireless? It says on the site that they have 802.11g implemented across the campus.

    8. Re:Over-wired? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      They should have budgeted in for students to get all they need to connect though. I'd be annoyed if I had to buy more equipment to connect my machines there, only to accomodate bandwidth I'll never realistically utilize.

      Bah, CWRU is probably the most expensive school in Northeast Ohio (tens of thousands of dollars a year in tuition easily) so I don't think a couple hundred bucks is going to break the kid. I know $40k/year to you Harvard students doesn't seem like much, but for us poor state university shmucks it's 10 times the cost of a year. ;-)

    9. Re:Over-wired? by Short+Circuit · · Score: 5, Informative

      At Gigabit speeds, fiber lets you run much longer drops...the NOC can be much, much farther away from your computer.

      Over twisted pair, you have to be within 100m, by cable length. I don't think there's a signal-based limit to fiber.

    10. Re:Over-wired? by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      I can picture massive cluster efforts run by computer and graphics clubs on campus.

    11. Re:Over-wired? by Feyr · · Score: 1

      there is, but it's much much longer.

      i recall a certain 80km mentionned for CDWM and longer for DWDM

    12. Re:Over-wired? by bjackson · · Score: 1
      running fiber only and no ethernet
      you do realize that the medium a network travels over has no bearing on what's being run on it right?

      you can have ethernet over fiber, token-ring over fiber, FDDI over (you guessed it) fiber.....
    13. Re:Over-wired? by Bishop · · Score: 2, Informative

      I don't think there's a signal-based limit to fiber.

      There are limits, but the limits are pretty long. Multimode fiber typically has a limit of about 2km. Singlemode fiber will typically have ranges up to 100km. Multimode is less expensive then singlemode and probably what this university is useing.

    14. Re:Over-wired? by afidel · · Score: 1

      Case has had fibre for forever. They were the largest ATM deployment ever. They used ATM to the desktop over fibre physical connections so this was just reusing existing fibre for something faster and better supported (finding PCI ATM cards was getting kind of hard and expensive). As to the annoyance, if you can afford a Case education you are definitly NOT worried about the $200 for a transciever.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    15. Re:Over-wired? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. It sound like he's one of them people who turn off image loading on their browser just to "save bandwidth".
      Probably wants to use a different browser like Mozilla or Opera too.
      Dang Commie Terrorist

    16. Re:Over-wired? by Analogy+Man · · Score: 4, Informative
      80km

      So for a campus...no problem.

      Another thing to consider is they may have actually been looking ahead to the future. I remember reading an article in 1991-1992 timeframe saying that the current PC technology had hit a plateau and there was little need for more powerful machines. Granted for a class of users this is true, but not many would want to be stuck with a 1 year old machine if they had a choice.

      Putting network infrastructure into older buildings not originally designed for it is expensive. I can see how they may want a solution that will last them more then 2 or 3 years before a major upgrade cycle.

      Another thought is this...apologies in advance to any alumni of this institution... but this is great marketing for a school that may otherwise have trouble distinguishing itself from the pack.

      --
      When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty.
    17. Re:Over-wired? by ThogScully · · Score: 1

      Yes, I do... I slipped.
      -N

      --
      I've nothing to say here...
    18. Re:Over-wired? by natalia_hill · · Score: 1

      I had fiber to my dorm room when I started there in 1993. Back then, they provided a loaner card. It sucks that the students are forced to buy a special network card that they'll only ever use at Case, but compared to the $25K a year and the uber-expensive books, it's a small consideration. Case is one of the ultimate hacker geek schools.

    19. Re:Over-wired? by ThogScully · · Score: 1

      I struggled my ass off to afford WPI, which is apparently now about $40k/year. I'm now in more debt than I can quantify and still working my ass off for it. I resent the extra costs associated with school still, especially books, when they were used so little in so many classes, regardless of price.

      I'll bet there are students at CWRU that can't necessarily or easily afford to be there.
      -N

      --
      I've nothing to say here...
    20. Re:Over-wired? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Case is one of the ultimate hacker geek schools.

      Meaning a small group of students in the dorm is going to purchase a one of those netgears and a $100 access point and they're all going to use the wireless hardware they already have and only the clueless english majors will purchase their own individual adapter.

    21. Re:Over-wired? by Rufus211 · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, but who cares? Yes, you are limited to 100m with copper, but that's a few stories of network runs. Any sensible network layout has the edge switches in the building they are going to, which will be at most a story or two away from then end points. The only time what you're talking about would matter is if you pulled all the fiber from across the entire campus back to one central point, which would just mean miles of pointless wiring.

    22. Re:Over-wired? by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      The potential concern is that if you're in an old building, there may not be a direct enough route to get where you want to go within a hundred meters, cable-wise.

      Of course, in that case, you might use more than one "central" switch to a building.

    23. Re:Over-wired? by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 1
      When meta-modding, how are you supposed to know if a redundant moderation is fair or not without reading way too much?

      Metamoderators should always read the context of the post they are meta-moderating. I've gotten enough "unfair" metamods to know that most metamoderators make no effort to determine whether or not a moderation is fair or unfair. If you don't have time for that, you probably should leave the metamoderation to someone else. (Doing it occasionally, but well is far more useful than doing it frequently, but badly.)
      --

      How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
    24. Re:Over-wired? by ratlater · · Score: 1

      That's exactly what I was thinking. It seems like a horrible waste of money to use fiber from the edge switches when copper would work just as well. If they are running fiber all the way to each room from their routing center then they are flat out nuts.

      I also wonder what kind of uplinks they have on their switches. Are they really running 10GbE or maybe 802.3AD?, or do they just have GbE uplinks as well?

      -matt

      --
      http://thewonderllama.com
    25. Re:Over-wired? by ThogScully · · Score: 1

      Dude, I was more or less pointing out the futility of asking meta-moderators to decide what's redundant. Without reading up on the whole article and commentary, there's no way to know if a comment is redundant or not.

      I'm aware you can extrapolate from context with most messages, but re-reading all the commentary is hardly reading the context.
      -N

      --
      I've nothing to say here...
    26. Re:Over-wired? by fireklar · · Score: 1
      Sounds like most over-wired. I would hope they could allow students to connect for free with all they saved by running fiber only and no ethernet. They should have budgeted in for students to get all they need to connect though. I'd be annoyed if I had to buy more equipment to connect my machines there, only to accomodate bandwidth I'll never realistically utilize.
      Case used to loan students equipment to connect to the network. In recent years they have implemented a policy that students must buy their own equipment which is pretty lame.
    27. Re:Over-wired? by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 1

      The entire thread is context when considering a redundant moderation. Sometimes it's easy to determine that it actually is redundant, sometimes it's easy to determine that it's not, and often you have to spend a few minutes on it. You don't neccessarily have to reread every comment in the discussion; a few well-chosen searches can narrow it down immensely. It's not futile, it just takes people who are willing to spend more than thirty seconds metamoderating.

      The real problem is the assumption that moderation is time-consuming and difficult, while metamoderation is quick and easy, while the opposite is probably closer to the truth. Of course, fixing that assumption would involve drastic changes to the moderation system.

      --

      How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
    28. Re:Over-wired? by ThogScully · · Score: 1

      And I thought people with such low IDs tended not to troll for a flame war... much less start them.

      Get over the signature - it's just a sig and it'll probably be gone soon enough. Get off your high horse and stop assuming that apparently you're the only one who really cares about meta-modding. And stop assuming I'm mucking up the system by just leaving redundant meta-mods alone. I do meta-mod and I do take the time necessary, but it is relatively quick to do for any other moderations. I felt I'd make a point of this with my sig and you seem to want to attack me for having that opinon. Finally, get over yourself.
      -N

      --
      I've nothing to say here...
    29. Re:Over-wired? by LurkerXXX · · Score: 1

      Well, one of the reasons is, at one point a good bit of the campus machines on a ATM network. The backbone was all ATM, and even many desktops had ATM cards. Fiber was run all over initially just for that purpose. The transition to gigabit has happened over the last couple years.

    30. Re:Over-wired? by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 1

      You "felt you'd make a point" with your sig, I felt I'd make a point by replying to it. Why is there anything wrong with that?

      And if you think that my reply was trolling, flaming, or an attack, you're an idiot. (Now that is a flame, albeit a minor one. See the difference?)

      --

      How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
    31. Re:Over-wired? by Rosonowski · · Score: 1

      Realistically, though, was there a need for faster computers? *looks at 486 in the corner* Ok, so maybe so. But I could certainly understand someone saying that today. I know people who have p3's or even p2's that are more than happy with them, because they do everything they need them to do.

      --
      01101001 01100001 01101101 01101110 01101111 01110100 01100001 01101100 01100001 01110111 01111001 01100101 01110010
    32. Re:Over-wired? by Rosonowski · · Score: 1

      That, or instead of 11mbps shared bandwidth between all of them, they'd wire their rooms with copper?

      --
      01101001 01100001 01101101 01101110 01101111 01110100 01100001 01101100 01100001 01110111 01111001 01100101 01110010
    33. Re:Over-wired? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Given the media converter and card they're recommending, they're running SX Gigabit. That's only 220 meters over 62.5 micron multimode fiber. If they installed 50 micron multimode fiber (not common in the US), it can go 500 meters.

    34. Re:Over-wired? by ACPosterChild · · Score: 1

      Oh, you'll utilize the bandwidth.

      Want to watch a movie? Load up one of the P2P apps, download a 2GB movie as fast as your hard drive can take it, and watch away! Much better than going to the video store ;)

    35. Re:Over-wired? by ACPosterChild · · Score: 1

      1) They had fiber laid since at least the early 90s. From what I understand, they went straight from Thinnet (coax cable) to fiber. So, it was kind of a 'Look at us' thing, like a lot of universities try to do in different areas to get funding and attract students, but it wasn't recent and solely for Gbps Ethernet. [We had 10Mbps optical cards when I was there in 93-98, then they moved up to 155Mbps ATM for awhile, 97-01 or so] So, copper is great, but they'd have to re-wire the whole university for it :)

      2) They used to provide the network card (~450 at the time, I think), which you had to return when you graduated. Now, like other businesses, they're doing a lot to cut costs. One of the ways is to charge a Network Fee for the upgrades they've made recently (Gbps ethernet routers replacing ATM equipment, wireless). It was supposed to be a one-time fee. Now it's every year (maybe even per semester). And, you now have to buy your own Gb Ethernet card. No, it doesn't have to be the one from the book store (but, last I knew, there were very few options in optical Gbps cards). One of the reasons they have the students buy them is because they don't cost $400 now, "only" $220. It pisses off a lot of people and parents. They should just add it to the cost of tuition and supply the students with one, and give them a refund if they already have one.

      Also, most people do use the bandwidth (for sharing large files. 4GB movies are commonplace transfers, and can take as little as a few minutes to transfer; 4000MB / 50MBps HD speed = 80 seconds, with real-world speed being about 2-4 times that on a good transfer). Of course, that use is hardly attributable to school, but at least the fiber isn't dark ;)

    36. Re:Over-wired? by ACPosterChild · · Score: 1

      Like I've mentioned in a post above, the fiber was installed in the early 90s at the latest (it was there when I started in '93). So, yes, they were looking ahead. They've changed laser and frame types at least twice (10Mbps ethernet in '93 to 155Mbps ATM in '97 to 1Gbps ethernet in '00, where it will likely stay for a good while).

      And yes, I think a good part of the decision was to help stand out. Case wants to be known as an MIT / Carnege Mellon class school. People ridiculed the decision to go with fiber saying that 100Mbps (and then, as the years went by, Gbps) ethernet over copper was coming soon. Well, if they would have went with the 2-pair option for 10/100 Mbps ethernet per drop, they wouldn't have been able to upgrade to Gbps without pulling new cable. Also, there is the repeater problem that was brought up. Case Western used to be two seperate schools, and is quite spread out in a doglegged oval shape (takes 1/2 hour to walk from one end to the other). Fiber for at least the backbone was pretty much necessary anyway.

  2. Just think... by Linegod · · Score: 1

    ...how fast the retrans will be when they hit the choke point!

    --
    -- I care not for your foolish signatures.
  3. Network Bootable by swordboy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I know that we've got CD-bootable Knoppix out there, but with networks like this, wouldn't it pay to have a network-bootable version of Linux floating around out there? I mean, every PC made today has a network boot option. It would be nice to see someone make use of it, since Microsoft never will.

    For things like repair and security, this would be great. I can see the day when spyware makes the average PC so insecure that online banking and other institutions *require* users to boot from a secured distro. Having it available on the network would just make it that much easier. In a few years, it will be trivial for a home router to hold the image.

    --

    Life is the leading cause of death in America.
    1. Re:Network Bootable by CaptainBaz · · Score: 1

      That actually makes a lot of sense, if there was a way to deal with the obvious security concerns.

      Some sort of distributed "grid" (ugh) of internet BOOTP/TFTP servers would not be too tricky to implement and would be useful today, eg. for installing various flavours of Linux.

      We already have the "netinst" floppy and CD-images, why not skip the middle stage and boot the image straight from the internet?

    2. Re:Network Bootable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linux can do that, although most of the distros doign that just act as thin clients.

    3. Re:Network Bootable by ThogScully · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't use it. I don't connect insecure machines to the internet, until I've had time to really work on them. My servers get built from Debian distributions, firewalled off, then updated from patches before they touch a connection.

      It's highly unlikely I would trust booting from a remote source to happen securely, especially when I'm assuming the network boot BIOS isn't too likely to tunnel that through SSH or something.
      -N

      --
      I've nothing to say here...
    4. Re:Network Bootable by velo_mike · · Score: 1
      ...doign that just act as thin clients.

      And in the parent's examples, online banking, a thin client would be the only thing needed. You could net boot a minimal OS; kernel, tcp stack, lightweight X client, and the desktop app, complete your translation securely, and reboot to whatever OS you run normally.

      --

      At the bottom of the endless pile of paper work which characterizes all regulation lies a gun.
      Alan Greenspan

    5. Re:Network Bootable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The campus wouldn't do it. They obviously care more about money with their Dell sponsored systems, expensive converter equipment and fiber optic cables. If they did anything, it would be partnered with Microsoft to make the school more money. Schools may preach on that they're all about furthering your education, but the reality is they want to line their pockets.

    6. Re:Network Bootable by TrentL · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I can see the day when spyware makes the average PC so insecure that online banking and other institutions *require* users to boot from a secured distro.

      Many banks and instituions require Internet Explorer because of it's "security". I'm pretty damn skeptical about how smart they'll be when requiring me to boot from a specific OS.

    7. Re:Network Bootable by CTho9305 · · Score: 1

      Andrew Linux, used at Carnegie Mellon, is heavily network-based.

    8. Re:Network Bootable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would hope so you cowardly communist bastard.

      What you need to find is a school that students go to because they give the best education and pay what it is worth.

    9. Re:Network Bootable by Trygve · · Score: 1

      We actually have a "Software Center" of site licensed software that all campus users have access to. Included in that is a network installer for Jaguar and Panther, so users can rebuild their Macs by just booting off a local server. It's pretty cool.

    10. Re:Network Bootable by battlinbill · · Score: 1

      Wow. I can see the interest in this, but it's been there all along. There's the X-Terminals which run off the network. All they have is some memory and a NIC. Pump out a login window to the unix farm and you're set.

      Interestingly they had this at UD and I recall that at one point there was a fun exploit that let a hacker take over an x-terminal. My only concern would be that the same type of exploit would be doable with a linux boot.

    11. Re:Network Bootable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, pay what the education is worth. Not pay for unnecessary overpriced trinkets. Just go to any campus bookstore and look at the stuff they try to hock there.

      The real shame is when they force you to pay for things you have no desire for when they put it into the "Student Activity Fees".

    12. Re:Network Bootable by bkoehler · · Score: 1

      Knoppix already supports booting from the network.

      http://www.knoppix.net/docs/index.php/FaqPXE

      Some of the tools (e.g. Ethereal) didn't work the last time I tried booting from the network, but I was quite successful at loading Knoppix on multiple PCs simultaneously.

    13. Re:Network Bootable by sweede · · Score: 1

      you can Network boot Windows XP Media Center and Embedded from a Windows 2000/2003 server over a network and it will be fully usable. You can boot Windows XP embeded and run Terminal Services into a Windows 2000 server for a thin-client PC without a harddrive.

      You can also install any version of Windows this same way, via BOOTP and TFTP. Windows has had this feature since the introduction of Windows 2000 (might of been avialable in NT too). I've done this many times to install Windows and Linux onto my mini-itx computer without a CD Drive.

      Microsoft took advantage of this some time ago.

      --
      I follow the SDK and GDN principles.. Spelling Dont Kount, Grammer Dont Neither
    14. Re:Network Bootable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm afraid that the degrees that most educational institutions provide are simply overpriced trinkets! :)

    15. Re:Network Bootable by clarkc3 · · Score: 1

      microsoft does use network booting, just to a very limited extent. you can use network booting to install the OS if you have a 2k/2k3 server running their remote installation services.

    16. Re:Network Bootable by blackmonday · · Score: 1

      Customer logs in to BofA.com: hello!

      BofA.com: We're sorry, we don't support Microsoft Windows anymore. You need to network boot off our secured linux distribution.

      Customer: FU, I'm going to WashingtonMutual.com

    17. Re:Network Bootable by Shmooze · · Score: 1

      Why bother with the whole network booting thing and just switch to terminals?

      What happens when you go home? Then you're screwed.

    18. Re:Network Bootable by Surt · · Score: 1

      How exactly is the bank going to verify that you booted from a secure distro?

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    19. Re:Network Bootable by The+Kow · · Score: 1

      Did you seriously just suggest that people reboot just to make a damn bank transaction? Do you have ANY concept of what a consumer is? Why in God's name would anyone ever convert to the first bank to do this? No average consumer is going to run around thinking they're infected with spyware. Most consumers don't even know what spyware IS. Even when they learn they'll think of it the same way people think of viruses now: 'Oh those sure are scary, but I'm really glad they always happen to the other guy.'

      Seriously, though. Rebooting just to complete an online bank transaction? Good lord.

      --
      Moo
    20. Re:Network Bootable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      thats because with IE they can run their own security code on the clients machine without any hassles with poping up windows asking wether or not to install some plugin.

    21. Re:Network Bootable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you christen them with Dom too? Jesus christ...

      I think the tinfoil is messing with your brain or something.

    22. Re:Network Bootable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You obviously haven't played with all of the functions of knoppix. One of the functions is to boot it on one computer and have other computers boot across the network from it. clusterKnoppix takes this one step further and adds clustered computing to this so they can share processors for easily migrated processes.

  4. Netgear? Peh by Yarn · · Score: 4, Informative

    Get one of these babies SK 9844.

    Offloads damn near everything, vlans, checksums etc. Doesn't do IPSEC, but then if you're spending about 700 on a NIC you'd get a separate crypto accelerator for that.

    --
    -Yarn - Rio Karma: Excellent
    1. Re:Netgear? Peh by rylin · · Score: 3, Funny
    2. Re:Netgear? Peh by dmayle · · Score: 1

      I've got to say, my favorite part about this card (from their website):

      Linux , 2.2., 2.4. (Open Source available)

    3. Re:Netgear? Peh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad it won't fit into my case....

    4. Re:Netgear? Peh by nicolas.e · · Score: 1

      I guess that means they have an opensource driver.

  5. it time... by millahtime · · Score: 4, Funny

    I think it's time to go back to grad school. and now i know where. wonder what grad degrees they have? oh well, that is just a little detail.

    1. Re:it time... by Elvisisdead · · Score: 2, Funny

      Except for that it's in Cleveland. Drew Cary is full of crap.

      --

      "Want in one hand and spit in the other and see which one fills up first." - My Dad
    2. Re:it time... by Life2Short · · Score: 1

      Yeah, Cleveland. The mistake by the lake.

    3. Re:it time... by LookSharp · · Score: 1

      Downsides:

      You're going to pay 30-40 thousand US dollars per year to go there.

      You're going to be living in a very urban area of the east side of Cleveland. I'm sorry, the east side isn't urban, it's CULTURED. I should know, I've lived on the east side of Cleveland for the better part of the past 16 years.

      Sidebar:
      The other folks who are complaining about "the mistake on the lake" are either sheltered and have been stuck in Euclid for the past 10 years, or heard something bad about Clevland once in a joke (You know the RIVER caught on FIRE! Yeah. 35 years ago.).

      I have lived all over the east coast and parts of the Mountain time zone. I have visited many other places. There are few other cities with such reasonable crime rates, reasonable access to arts and entertainment, reasonably nice people, and a wide variety of suburbs to choose from. I choose to live and work in Cleveland and I am quite happy about it, thanks.

      It's nice to take a vacation during March/April, because 10 weeks of overcast skies and rain is kinda much, but still... ;)

    4. Re:it time... by arglesnaf · · Score: 1

      Bah, you uppity East siders.

      - Sean, a CWRU night grad student living in Berea.

    5. Re:it time... by LookSharp · · Score: 1

      I've lived on south side for last 6... buying a house in Lake county now. FAR east side!

  6. Drexelites 5.1-3 by nomannerofmanatall · · Score: 1

    "Now, I'd really hate for you
    computer jocks to feel left
    out,
    Because we all talk different
    languages,
    Don't we?"

  7. Good moves... Gotta start somewhere by Piranhaa · · Score: 3, Insightful

    As copper ethernet is nearing its end, fiber only seems like the only other logical way to go for networking. As more and more people start switching to fiber, the more the price gets driven down. If we have large universities like these all switching to fiber (and i mean for thousands of people) the better the price looks for normal consumers! I think it's a good move on their part, even though they need to pay a little hefty price for the card. I believe it's worth it!

    1. Re:Good moves... Gotta start somewhere by Psiren · · Score: 1

      As copper ethernet is nearing its end, fiber only seems like the only other logical way to go for networking.

      I disagree. Copper is absolutely fine for the desktop. There's no reason to use fibre unless your network point isn't close enough, which is unlikely. Fibre for the backbone is perfectly sensible, since that's the area where you're most likely to need to increase speed. Copper is far easier to work with, and far cheaper, and unless you need 10gbit to the desktop (I know students consume a lot of bandwidth, but that's taking things a little far), copper will do you just fine.

    2. Re:Good moves... Gotta start somewhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      As copper ethernet is nearing its end, fiber only seems like the only other logical way to go for networking.

      They've been saying that for years! It fooled me the first few times. Now I know not to believe it. Fiber always costs lost more than copper. It's harder to maintain too. From what I see, we still have a couple more generation in copper before the magic runs out we'll need fiber to go faster.

    3. Re:Good moves... Gotta start somewhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      As copper ethernet is nearing its end, fiber only seems like the only other logical way to go for networking.

      What, are you an idiot? Copper is here to stay.

      Many reasons why:
      1. copper is cheap
      2. copper is durable - try bending your fiber too much
      3. any idiot (ie, me) can make high-quality RJ-45 copper connections
      4. copper connectors are FAR more durable than fiber connectors
      5. putting connectors on a fiber requires FAR more equipment & training
      6. gigabit ethernet on copper is so fast - even my brand new $5k dell server can't saturate gigabit

      Now of course, fiber has enourmous advantages when you need to go any significant distance (> 100m), but otherwise, there is no point.

    4. Re:Good moves... Gotta start somewhere by falcon5768 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      99% of the homes running cable and DSL havent even hit 10 bit eithernets limits for any sustained time..

      Copper Eithernet is hardly on its way out

      --

      "Slashdot, where telling the truth is overrated but lying is insightful."

    5. Re:Good moves... Gotta start somewhere by tbaggy · · Score: 2, Informative

      Nah, copper ethernet is going just as strong as fiber ethernet:
      http://www.lightreading.com/document.asp?doc_id=48 337

    6. Re:Good moves... Gotta start somewhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "As copper ethernet is nearing its end, fiber only seems like the only other logical way to go for networking."

      Umm...doesn't current trends seem to point to a movement towards wireless lans?

    7. Re:Good moves... Gotta start somewhere by otterpop81 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, we've just switched to all FDDI around here. We just figure that fiber is going to be the future, so we junked all our 10/100 equipment. Interestingly enough, the internet doesn't really feel any faster yet, but we've got our guy working on it. It must just be some configuration problem. It's light, right? It has to be faster than copper.

    8. Re:Good moves... Gotta start somewhere by whelck · · Score: 1

      I would hardly say copper ethernet is nearing an end. It can easily sustain gig speeds, and specs are in the work for 10gig. If anything, this severely limits the ability to connect to the network.
      Why not wire every room with Cat6 and allow people to connect and whatever speed their computer allows. Even if you get a gig-ready computer, you still have to shell out an extra couple hundred to get it to work.

    9. Re:Good moves... Gotta start somewhere by JJahn · · Score: 1

      And anyone who has at least part of a working brain can wire their own CAT-5 in their house. Fiber takes more tools and experience to do properly (without breaking things at least)

    10. Re:Good moves... Gotta start somewhere by Junta · · Score: 1

      I disagree... Fiber is *not* the end-all be-all, and isn't even needed to do high speed. I work every day on copper media going up to 10 gigabit. The price point of copper media and supporting electronics will remain cheaper. Fiber has been around a long time and has not come down in price any. Crimping fiber is a pain in the ass compared with copper. And the fragility of fiber is another issue.

      I don't understand fiber to each and every dorm room, that requires first that every customer purchase an expensive fiber card, and it increases maintenance costs. For the lengths associated with dorms, fiber is overkill (unless they are *massive* facilities. I could understand having fiber trunks between buildings or even between floors of a building, but the complexity and cost of a fiber to the dorm room solution is incredible and yields *zero* perceptible benefit. With copper, they don't require the students to purchase equipment they will probably never use outside of school at exhorbitant amounts.

      Fiber is the solution for long-haul or extreme short latency for trunks, storage, extreme low latency HPC (ala Myrinet), or extreme security paranoid environments (EM leakage out of copper media is actually a concern for some really paranoid organizations). Throughput through copper isn't such a terrible problem, especially at mere gigabit speeds.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    11. Re:Good moves... Gotta start somewhere by swb · · Score: 1

      I doubt copper is going anywhere, if anything because the cabling and connectors are more rugged, simpler to implement and far less expensive. AFAIK copper has kept pace with fiber in the speed department, and, if our company is any indication, for the vast majority of end-luser connections 100Mbit speeds are seldom exceeded anyway. Yes, I know this is a 640K-type argument that doesn't apply to everyone or to server core networks.

      Copper can also grow -- I wouldn't be surprised if some future flavor of ethernet moved to a 6 pair cable. It'd break the Cat5 standard in place, but if you've been around long enough you'd know that Cat5 requirements pushed out a lot of Cat3 cable plants as well.

    12. Re:Good moves... Gotta start somewhere by RhettLivingston · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I hit the limit on 100BaseT at home ages ago. I now have Gigabit throughout. Its really the very simple things that hit it. Try playing a DVD quality movie over your net or watching live output from a firewire video camera without actually getting up and moving it to the PC that you're on. These are exactly the kinds of things that regular consumers should be doing but probably tried once and "learned their lesson" without knowing that all they needed was to have current networking technology.

      If a school wants to support live multicast video conferencing in something other than stupid little 320 line windows, you need tech like this. Students should be working with tomorrows tech, not yesterdays.

    13. Re:Good moves... Gotta start somewhere by superpulpsicle · · Score: 1

      Boy you must not do anything with high bandwidth. Cause I know living off 10baseT back in college was a disaster. The kid down down your hall play a little quake, and your network is done for the day. 100baseT was upgraded then, but it wasn't a whole lot better.

    14. Re:Good moves... Gotta start somewhere by afidel · · Score: 1

      Copper is NOT here to stay, at least not long term. Cat5e/6 is already at its breaking point with Gigabit, there just isn't any frequency capacity left if you want reasonable drop lengths. There is a 10Gbit technology using special encoding schemes but it's limited in length to ~50m.

      The 802.3an group has set goals for specifying 10G over 55 to 100 meters of 200-MHz Category 6 or 100 meters of 600-MHz Category 7 cable.

      Good Cat7 is about $0.40/foot whereas 2 Strand,MM,62.5/125,CMR is only $0.20/foot. Prices here. If you are going to have to rewire anyways why not do it right, AND save 50% on cable?

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    15. Re:Good moves... Gotta start somewhere by swv3752 · · Score: 1

      It depends on if there is a per floor electrical closet or per building, and size of building. Heck even a large floor and poor location of the closet can stretch the length limit of cat5.

      It might be that fiber was a cheaper/easier solution than running a repeater in the walls/ceilings.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
    16. Re:Good moves... Gotta start somewhere by falcon5768 · · Score: 1
      like I said, 99%

      Slashdot users are the 1%

      Most people DONT stream stuff from their PC, not because they cant do it, but because its not practical and it is not needed. Most people dont even want to run wires period, your telling them to run fiber, something that even for skilled techs is not a easy thing to set up.

      Now lets go even further, why would a student need video conferencing IN THEIR DORM ROOM! Its uneeded, its overkill. If it where a classroom thats one thing, My schoolsytem has fiber running to each building. But dorm rooms? Yeah you might have a graphic design or music project with that large a file, but odds are your doing it in your lab, not your dorm room.

      As for working on current tech, I would rather the students work on older tech than current stuff... why? Because if there is one thing I learned training now my third assistant, its kids who only grow up on new tech ONLY know new tech and are not worth it if you have a mixed infastructure, and in the real world thats just not feasable because old tech outweighs new tech out there....

      --

      "Slashdot, where telling the truth is overrated but lying is insightful."

    17. Re:Good moves... Gotta start somewhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      thats more poor network setup - fiber trunks between floors and using VLANs would take care of that. Blaming it on quake is kind of worthless too since the amount of actual bandwith quake uses is insignificant compared to most things (people streaming music, sharing files, downloads)

    18. Re:Good moves... Gotta start somewhere by Junta · · Score: 1

      copper vs. fiber doesn't make a difference. It was likely in a hub environment or really oversubscribed network architecture.

      I deal with copper ethernet networks with high end switches and they perform as well as the fiber configurations for significant runs. A significant problem indemic to ethernet networks is the use of crappy low end switches with low-end throughput overall, or stringing 48 port switches together with single cables. If you work with fiber, you *have* to buy better switches.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    19. Re:Good moves... Gotta start somewhere by ashot · · Score: 1

      perhaps thats because 99% of homes run cable and DSL, therefore high-bandwith content is not being produced, someone's got to break the cycle though.

      --
      -ashot
    20. Re:Good moves... Gotta start somewhere by timeOday · · Score: 1
      Now lets go even further, why would a student need video conferencing IN THEIR DORM ROOM! Its uneeded, its overkill.
      I wouldn't say the videoconferencing is "needed," but like the current low bandwidth (text-based) Internet, it could sure be nice.

      Look at how TV has taken over from books and newspapers (measured by avg. hours of consumption). Expect the same thing on the Web, as the infrastructure becomes capable of video on demand. The Internet is so heavily text-based now mostly because of bandwith limitations.

      Look at CNN, they didn't even bother with a text version until the Web. Maybe this school's paper will be video on demand? They'll be way ahead of the curve.

      Having a video archive of lectures available on demand would be hugely beneficial at times, like when you're taking a course from one of those professors who doesn't have any substantial course materials and just sort of jots everything up on the whiteboard.

      How about students that copy each others' lab writeups instead of actually doing them? You could easily instrument the lab so students submitted footage of themselves doing the tasks along with the writeup.

      I've had Communications and Art courses where part of the assigned courseload was consuming media - little educational videos and so forth. We had to do it at the library in a media center funded by the school, so the applicability there is obvious.

      There's always soemthing interesting going on at a university. Maybe you have too much homework to go catch an interesting colloquium or concert, but at least you could catch it live or later than evening.

      Study groups can be nice, but the time demands of congregating can be limiting. Courses already have mailing lists and chat rooms; imagine how much richer those could be.

      Limited to the techno-elite 1%-ers? I don't see why any of this would be harder to use than the current text-based Internet.

      All these applications have direct analogues in business, and as future businesses in their own right. I almost think I'm diminishing the possibilities by suggesting a handful of applications. If anything, I think the temptation would be to go too far, and miss out on live, individual interaction.

  8. of course. . . by heller · · Score: 5, Interesting

    this has been known about CWRU since every dorm room had 10Mb to the rooms back in the very early 90s and before. This is almost entirely due to the Cleveland Freenet/CWRUNet, which many might remember as the first and biggest internet accessible BBS that spawn a series of other Freenets, including Cincinnati and Detroit area ones.

  9. Err... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    George Washington Univ. had fiber to every room when my friends sister went there in 1999. You got a media converter to borrow for the year for free. Sounds like a better deal than CWU...

    1. Re:Err... by geniusj · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yup.. My girlfriend goes there now and has fiber running directly to her room. However, the media converter they give you outputs 10mbit if I remember correctly.

    2. Re:Err... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      Note to self: Find a girl at Case Western so I can leech her connection.

    3. Re:Err... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, having gone here for a number of years, there are VERY few Case girls that you would want to leech anything off of, let alone accidentally catch a glimpse of.

      That said though, I've seen a few people bash the school, and while it's got it's beaurocratic problems like any other large institution, I found most of the faculty and staff to be helpful, found a great group of friends here, and have enjoyed the University ircle and Cleveland area very much. The Case experience, like most others, is what you make of it, so don't be discouraged by the naysayers if you have a good attitude about things. CWRU isn't half bad.

    4. Re:Err... by nightsweat · · Score: 1

      Hell - for that kind of bandwidth, find a guy at Case Western so you can leech his connection.

      --

      the major advances in civilization are processes which all but wreck the societies in which they occur - A.N. White
    5. Re:Err... by ua6oxa · · Score: 1

      That's only if you have a laptop, as they have built-in Ethernet cards and many cannot be outfitted with a fiber adapter.

      The media converter they give you is an 8-port switch, fiber or copper in (I believe), Ethernet out.

      If you have a desktop, you just get a fiber gigabit card.

    6. Re:Err... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is, if you USE the media converter. I actually bought a fiber card (back when we had no option, fiber card or nothing...) and now I can download at 25MB/s from other on campus users. Also since our I2 isn't capped, we can get great rates from other universities on that as well. Great for things like I2hub. ;)

    7. Re:Err... by Jmstuckman · · Score: 1

      I bought the media converter, and it does output the full 1000mbit. There was a 10mbit back in the days of ATM for students on 10mbps fiber ethernet, but that's gone now.

    8. Re:Err... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A 10 milibit/s connection? Why, thats worse than dialup!

      (Ok, enough nitpicking, but capitalization does matter.)

  10. 100 MBit is good enough for anybody by Gothmolly · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Whose HD can constantly suck up more than a 100 MB pipe? (Don't quote me some Sandra benchmark off a gamerz site, here) And if 100 people in a dorm are all "on fiber" and the dorm has "fiber" to the campus core router, which has "fiber" somewhere else, at what point does the bandwidth get divided down below 100 MBit anyway? You're not going to get more than that, why run expensive fiber when you can run cheapo Cat 5, and put the phones on the unused pairs as well? The math doesn't work here.

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
    1. Re:100 MBit is good enough for anybody by Anonymous+Custard · · Score: 4, Informative

      Whose HD can constantly suck up more than a 100 MB pipe?

      100 MByte/sec HD != 100Mbit network

      You only realistically get about 10MBytes/second over a 100Mbit network. So Gigabit (1000 Mbit) would be closer to the hard drive limit. SATA drive are capable of 150 MByte/second transfer rate, although not many production drive currently do today.

      Plus, downloading to your HD isn't the only thing you can do with a network. You can stream live lectures to people's rooms, use a network application server to allow students to access large server programs, VNC from the helpdesk with no choppiness, etc.

      why run expensive fiber when you can run cheapo Cat 5

      Becase it's a big undertaking to rewire a campus, so you'd better do it right and prepare for the future, instead of locking yourself into today/yesterday's technology.

    2. Re:100 MBit is good enough for anybody by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      The fiber will last 20 -50 years.
      While fiber is not cheap, manpower is also not cheap and only getting more expensive. If they had to redo wiring might as well switch to fiber now, and avoid the re-wiring hassle in 10 years.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    3. Re:100 MBit is good enough for anybody by hurterer · · Score: 1

      A good 7200RPM disk will give you a sustained 30MB/s read and write (ish - close enough anyway).

      A really good 100Mb/s network will give you 10MB read and write (up and down).

      So you've pretty much made the point that at the moment, 100Mbit networks arent good enough, but gigabit networks are.

      (You might want to pay attention to the case of those little 'b's after the numbers, next time)

    4. Re:100 MBit is good enough for anybody by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 1
      You're not going to get more than that, why run expensive fiber when you can run cheapo Cat 5, and put the phones on the unused pairs as well? The math doesn't work here.

      Unless they're using Voice over IP phones. Still, gigabit to the desktop in a dorm room is ridiculous. I don't even have that at work.

    5. Re:100 MBit is good enough for anybody by artemis67 · · Score: 0

      What if Neo took both pills?

      You mean like this?

    6. Re:100 MBit is good enough for anybody by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      >>You can stream live lectures to people's rooms

      yeah but wake on LAN doesn't stretch to the students....

    7. Re:100 MBit is good enough for anybody by hellmarch · · Score: 0

      "Still, gigabit to the desktop in a dorm room is ridiculous. I don't even have that at work." bah, we don't server your kind here. you'll have to wait outside.

    8. Re:100 MBit is good enough for anybody by Short+Circuit · · Score: 2, Interesting

      How about VNC at 1600x1200x32bits?

      Your video card is capable of consuming a lot more data than your hard drive can.

    9. Re:100 MBit is good enough for anybody by CTho9305 · · Score: 1

      Realistically, you usually don't max out a fast connection with standard protocols. I've found that bittorrent does a good job, but guess what? It doesn't do sequential read/writes, but instead has a VERY random access pattern. My drive thrashes with bittorrent on just a 10Mbps connection - I really doubt you could sustain 100Mbps speeds with bittorrent accessing random locations across a 1gb file...

      No other protocols usually offer large enough content (CD ISOs, movies, etc) that 100Mbps is much faster, and when they do, the server rarely has enough bandwidth to max out a 100Mbps connection.

    10. Re:100 MBit is good enough for anybody by Sumocide · · Score: 1
      SATA drive are capable of 150 MByte/second transfer rate, although not many production drive currently do today.

      Exactly zero really aren't many.

    11. Re:100 MBit is good enough for anybody by Mr.Ned · · Score: 1

      Our college campus is upgrading everything to gigabit ethernet (over regluar cables, and not mandating it like these jokers). I hear there's VoIP in the works to replace the telephone system, and *that* is what needs the extra bandwidth.

    12. Re:100 MBit is good enough for anybody by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      Have you tried VNC over gigabit?

      I think there is a bandwidth throttling so it doesn't saturate the connection. I haven't figured out where the limiter seting is in the source.

    13. Re:100 MBit is good enough for anybody by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      Is the school really mandating it, or just strongly recommending it? IIRC, very few switches don't autonegotiate down to 100bFX.

    14. Re:100 MBit is good enough for anybody by GoRK · · Score: 1

      My drive thrashes with bittorrent on just a 10Mbps connection - I really doubt you could sustain 100Mbps speeds with bittorrent accessing random locations across a 1gb file...

      Either you need some more RAM or BitTorrent needs a rewrite.

    15. Re:100 MBit is good enough for anybody by Maserk · · Score: 1

      I'm not to sure putting the phone line on the spare pair is really a good idea. For the cost two runs of cat 5 should really be run, one for phone/backup and one for data. Just my two cents.

    16. Re:100 MBit is good enough for anybody by dhovis · · Score: 1
      why run expensive fiber when you can run cheapo Cat 5
      Becase it's a big undertaking to rewire a campus, so you'd better do it right and prepare for the future, instead of locking yourself into today/yesterday's technology.

      Funny you should say that. Case is using fiber optic cables they put in in 1992 or so. Their network has long been fiber only, which has forced them into using expensive NICs, but has allowed them to upgrade to ATM (big mistake), and now to switched gigabit without having to rip open any walls. I went there from 1994-1998 and even then they were running 10 megabit ethernet over fiber.

      --

      --
      The internet is the greatest source of biased information in the history of mankind.

    17. Re:100 MBit is good enough for anybody by kundor · · Score: 1

      Uh, it makes a HUGE difference. Downloading a full movie in less than a minute rather than half an hour.

      Yes, I'm a Case student.

    18. Re:100 MBit is good enough for anybody by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      Have you tried VNC over gigabit?

      No...My upper limit was over 100base-TX. Normally, though, I run 1280x960x8 to a box behind a cablemodem.

      I think there is a bandwidth throttling so it doesn't saturate the connection. I haven't figured out where the limiter seting is in the source.

      Huh. If you're using realVNC, have you tried tightVNC? Or vice-versa?

      Have you watched your CPU usage to see if that could be the problem? I imagine some compression schemes at such high throughput could use a significant amount of throughput.

    19. Re:100 MBit is good enough for anybody by KarmaMB84 · · Score: 1

      Most drives probably have a hard time sustaining ATA33 speeds. Higher HD *interface* speeds are for bursting of cached data. High speed ethernet is for bursting cached data OR running of a nice RAID setup that CAN saturate that 100MBit with ease :)

    20. Re:100 MBit is good enough for anybody by mog007 · · Score: 1

      That's why the AGP bus goes to the north bridge, and the IDE channel goes to the south bridge, sharing it with the PCI channel.

    21. Re:100 MBit is good enough for anybody by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gigabit Ethernet will saturate any PCI-33 bus and push 70-80% on PCI-66.

  11. Dell?? by mpost4 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Why dell, after the problems I had with the h^hdell laptop and the hostility I got form the tech "support" for the first year when the hard drive was starting to go bad they just hung up on me, then after the year was up they just came back with your warenty is up we can not help you. Well I say fuck dell.

    1. Re:Dell?? by stlthVector · · Score: 1

      Same here. Dell Optiplex desktops are great but I'll never buy a Dell laptop. We had so many problems with our Dell laptops at work it's not funny. I finnaly convinced my boss to switch to something reliable - IBM ThinkPads.

      We had everything go wrong with the Dells from poor engineering that results in the keys marking the screen to bad harddrives, memory, motherboards, screens, batteries, mouse buttons that fall off...AAAAHHHHHH!!!! They're trash. We tried Inspirons and Latitudes.

    2. Re:Dell?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here, here! I'm tired of Dell and all of the brainwashed people who believe that there is something inherently magical about a box with the Dell logo on it. Apparently now CWRU falls into this category.

      Example: when I suggested that he replace his Dell P2 450MHz w/128MB SDRAM because it just wasn't up to the task of running WP Pro and all of his memory-hogging applications, one of my customers indignantly replied 'it can handle it, it's a Dell.' What really gets me is that this same guy has had nothing but trouble with the last two Dells he purchased and he's still a Dell sycophant.

      Most folks think that Dell is on the cutting edge of technology, but the fact is that they get a lot of their cost advantage by regurgitating the results of other companies' R&D.

      If you say that this rant is just sour grapes, you'd be right--I do wish that I could get away with the kind of crap that Dell does!

    3. Re:Dell?? by KGIS · · Score: 1

      I've never had any real problems with my Dells (I've had 3 due to upgrades) One of my laptop keyboards started misbehaving slightly and it was repaired the next day at no cost to me or the company I work for.

      Plus, I know that some universities are now "official" Dell repair/warranty shops and will perform any maintenance required on any student computers. This combined with educational discounts offered to students of some schools actually works out quite well.

    4. Re:Dell?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you ever noticed how tuna absorbs mayonnaise? You can make tuna salad one day and it will have plenty of mayo, and the next day the mayo's all gone.

      I hate that!

    5. Re:Dell?? by swv3752 · · Score: 1

      Because the University probably gets a small kickback to recommend Dell or Apple.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
  12. file sharing by millahtime · · Score: 2, Funny

    Just imagine the speeds they can share their mp3 collection at. I bet they are the next top target of the RIAA

    1. Re:file sharing by The_reformant · · Score: 1

      You dont have to imagine..they can share at 1Gbit/s

      --
      I have discovered a truly remarkable sig which this post is too small to contain.
    2. Re:file sharing by avisdream · · Score: 1

      Or, imagine the speeds they can download spyware that does "pretty things" at.

      I forsee a lot of messed up computers.

  13. nothing new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    CWRU used to have ATM to each dorm....years ago...in fact, it was over 5 years ago that they had it

  14. *cough*kickback*cough* by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 4, Insightful
    "CWRU recommends the purchase of either a Dell or Apple for incoming students to meet networking requirements. "

    You know, I didn't see any problem with this submission until I read this at the end. There is absolutely no reason this should have been included in the press relea...errrr....story submission.

    Any brand of machine meeting the min. specs would do quite well, in fact I'm sure you could go a bit below them on a home built machine and get by fine.

    A note to all the PR people who submit things to slashdot. If you make things as blatantly obvious as this, we WILL notice, and we WILL make certain to point it out to fellow readers (or at least I will).

    --
    Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    1. Re:*cough*kickback*cough* by martinX · · Score: 1

      Because it mentions Dell (we hate) and Apple (we love) and so generates more comments than if the ad was omitted.

      --
      When they came for the communists, I said "He's next door. Take him away. Goddam commies."
    2. Re:*cough*kickback*cough* by Zachary+Kessin · · Score: 3, Informative

      Universities often recomend specific computers, why? Well there are several resons, but majorly you know some of the computers will break and students will drag them down to the university computer shop and therefore it helps if you limit what most people are using to a few brands.

      OK the geeks are going to buy what they want. But then again they probably can fix it on their own too.

      I'm glad when I was at brandeis they had standard cat 5, my laptop at the time was a 10 year old powerbook duo that I picked up cheap on ebay and it would not be able to do anything with fiber.

      --
      Erlang Developer and podcaster
    3. Re:*cough*kickback*cough* by TheGavster · · Score: 1, Informative

      My school 'strongly suggests' getting an IBM notebook, but it makes sense since you can bulk buy with the other thousand people who need to buy one, and there's enough IBM machines in operation to get us an on-site IBM repair facility. Of course, any machine (within reason) will work with the network, its just that for the purposes of getting a machine and having it maintained that sticking to the standard is better for you.

      --
      "Because Science" is one step from "Because old book". Try "Because of my experiment testing my falsifiable assertion".
    4. Re:*cough*kickback*cough* by lucifuge31337 · · Score: 1

      10 year old powerbook duo that I picked up cheap on ebay and it would not be able to do anything with fiber.

      You have heard of media converters, right?

      --
      Do not fold, spindle or mutilate.
    5. Re:*cough*kickback*cough* by JeffTL · · Score: 1

      The really suspicious part is that they imply that an iBook, iMac, or eMac cannot connect to their network. The suggested minimum Apple laptop is a PowerBook, and for desktops they suggest only a G5, overkill for many people, though it is certain to last you four years if you handle it well so they have a point. While they don't have Cat-5 lines run so you can use Ethernet with a lesser Mac (or lesser PC), they appear to have universal Wi-Fi. Any modern computer (Mac, Windows, and often others such as Linux) either has wireless or can be affordably upgraded with a wireless card. Therefore, you could haul an iBook or an old Dell Inspiron onto the Case Western campus and you'd have no trouble, though even if you paid the $216 you wouldn't be able to use the wired network.

    6. Re:*cough*kickback*cough* by Brian+Stretch · · Score: 1

      ...but majorly you know some of the computers will break and students will drag them down to the university computer shop and therefore it helps if you limit what most people are using to a few brands.

      They're Dells. It's pretty much a given that they're going to break. A lot. Though I suppose Dell's outsourcing of tech support to Indians is much easier when the Indians are already on campus...

      Anyhow, if I was a university IT admin, I'd be mandating Athlon 64 machines just so I'd have a few less Windows worms clogging my network once Microsoft ships WinXP Service Pack 2 (adds support for the NX bit, No eXecute, which AMD64 series chips have and Intel 32-bit chips don't, stops buffer overrun attacks). Plus they'd put less of a load on the university power grid than the Prescott-core Pentium 4 "Blast Furnace Edition", even before enabling power management.

    7. Re:*cough*kickback*cough* by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

      Take off your tinfoil hat for a moment
      They reccomend Dell and Apple at my university as well.
      Reason? Nice student discounts.

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    8. Re:*cough*kickback*cough* by Large+Green+Mallard · · Score: 1

      Gigabit Fibre only runs at 1000Mbit. It CANNOT clock down to a slower fibre ethernet speed. You'll also notice they specify a media converter so you can plug in the GigE UTP ports. This will also only run at 1000MBit.

      With a GigE switch + MC you could plug one..

    9. Re:*cough*kickback*cough* by ACPosterChild · · Score: 1

      Are you saying the Dell and/or Apple posted this to get recognition? And, to do so, they put their product as basically and end note about the fiber network, rather than say "the all new Apple/Dell XXX machine is the only one good enough for Case!"? Gimme a break. There's not a single damn person that would buy a Dell or Mac based on this post, and no logical thinking person should think so. [And, once more, I hate the fucking moderators here.]

      However, I'll tell you what this post most likely is: it's an incoming freshman trying to tell everybody how huge his pipe (i.e., dick) is. The link to the recommended systems is the same thing.

      Also, they *have* to recommend a computer. They test their network and school-supplied software (anti-virus, MS Office, Mathematica, lots more stuff) with something. They used to say "any computer with a 66MHz 486 processor, 16MB RAM, and 340MB hard drive, will do". But parents and non-computer people who get all confused about what is RAM, HD, MHz, etc, simply need pointed to an example system. People are told, if they ask, that they can bring any brand and / or home built, and they do. Also, some people want to know that their multi-thousand dollar computer for college will be guaranteed to work. My parents forced me to buy the recommended computer rather than a cheaper one I found with the same specs for that reason (of course, I only agreed because Dad said "You have to buy that one; after all I'm the one paying for it", and I thought "OK, it's your money to waste", and then I got stuck paying for everything myself, but that's another story).

  15. what a waste by hb253 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Ridiculous overkill. How about putting the money towards lowering sky high tuition costs?

    --
    Self awareness - try it!
    1. Re:what a waste by Dachannien · · Score: 2, Interesting

      While still definitely expensive (about $1100 per credit hour, or $26.5k/year for undergrads), tuition at CWRU is substantially less than that at private institutions with more name recognition.

      MIT, for example, is $30.6k/year.

    2. Re:what a waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually CWRU is known for offering almost ridiculous amounts of scholarship/financial aid to anyone who did decent on their SAT's. Almost everyone in my high school applied to Case Western just to have bargaining power. ("Well... CWRU offered me $XX dollars a year, can you do better ?)

      (This was back in '99)

    3. Re:what a waste by PetoskeyGuy · · Score: 1

      That reminds me of a very stupid tax law in Michigan. I don't know if it's still around or not. If your school DID NOT raise tuition more then 2% that year, then you as a student qualified for a deduction on your income tax. If they did raise tuition too much, you lose out on that deduction as well. What's the point of taking more money from students who are already being charged too much?

  16. Fastest domestic service? by MetaMarty · · Score: 1

    This makes me wonder what the fastest connection available to normal houses is. I have an 8 Mbit ADSL connection. I've seen 16 Mbit, but it requires 2 telephone wire pairs. Anyone else got more?

    1. Re:Fastest domestic service? by really? · · Score: 1

      Here in Tokyo they have teams that are pushing 100Mbit contracts at just about every train station and busy corner - VDSL under US$ 40 a month unlimmited up/down.

      --

      "Consistency is contrary to nature, contrary to life. The only completely consistent people are the dead." A. Huxley
    2. Re:Fastest domestic service? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Providing you live in any of the bigger cities in sweden and you live in an apartment you can get a BredBandsBolaget connection. Then you have the choice of either a 10Mbit connection or a 100Mbit connection. The 10Mbit version costs 45-50 usd per month i think. I don't know about the 100Mbit version.

  17. Couple of questions by Xugumad · · Score: 5, Insightful

    1. Why on earth fiber? The advantage of fiber is that it works over long distances (standard copper ethernet cables can only go for about 200m I believe). It's great for connecting seperate sites. It's lousy for connecting dorm rooms. They should have had fiber coming into the halls, into a router, with gigabit switches serving the rooms. Suddenly, as long as you have RJ-45 ethernet, you can connect.

    2. How much actual bandwidth is there. In particular, if you divide their bandwidth to the Internet, by the number of students, I bet you get a lot less than gigabit. Even taking into account that only a fraction of them will be online at any one time, I'd be suprised if this is actually much faster than most universities with a network in the halls.

    1. Re:Couple of questions by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 2, Informative

      There are seveal reasons to use fiber. It takes up less conduit space, it's tougher for the students to tap into and randomly splice in stupid things like telephones, the switches often support superior levels of router control, and the superior bandwidth offers greater flexibility for both dorm use and lab use, especially for backup and PXE baed network re-installations. MIT, for example, reloads the OS on its workstations every time you reboot them. That sort of thing takes serious bandwidth. Better to spend the money up front now to get the fiber laid for the next 20 years of use than be stuck with out of date networking and continuous upgrades for the next 20 years, which adds up to a lot of money.

    2. Re:Couple of questions by Bob+Zer+Fish · · Score: 1

      the idea is that it saves money since you can always just up the bandwidth by using more colours. Initially pricey but in the long term a great investment.

    3. Re:Couple of questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Just to answer you, since I was just having a conversation with our campus IT guy, who had a tour of that network. I'll answer these as I understood it:

      1. They bought a whole lotta fiber quite a bit back, with the idea that it would be more useful over time. (For example, we're just upgrading from 10Mbit in our halls to fast ethernet switches. They really don't need to do that...) I was also told that some years ago, they were the exclusive provider of a modified NIC you needed to buy, so it was also a revenue stream. (Though I can't imagine that got them much.) Additionally, that kind of insane bandwidth makes large engineering tasks that need the bandwidth pretty easy. Granted, they found something like 60% of their network usage is streaming pr0n, but the possibility is there.

      2. There is a HECK OF A LOT of bandwidth. It seems like the slashdot crowd is having a hard time coping with multiple strands. Yes, there are hyuuuuuge bundles moving out of the dorms, with more than enough bandwidth to serve those rooms. (Again, as I understood it. I'm told they went under the main road there quite a number of times to lay cable at insane cost.)

      Also, just as a pet peeve....for anyone that says fiber "saves" them so much money, keep in mind that each new fiber port they want on a switch costs over $1000 bucks, adding in users is NOT cheap!

    4. Re:Couple of questions by Anonymous+Custard · · Score: 1

      In particular, if you divide their bandwidth to the Internet, by the number of students, I bet you get a lot less than gigabit.

      No, an internet connection doesn't really need to be fibre based. But internal network activity will benefit, and fibre will give them room to grow.

      Plus, this will prepare them for an Internet2 upgrade in the future.

    5. Re:Couple of questions by starbuzz · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Why Fiber?

      Simple: The network also easily carries the phone and all TV signals. No further cabling needed.

      (I've been at Case.)

    6. Re:Couple of questions by Dachannien · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Or, it's better to spend the money 15 years ago and reap the benefits of fiber that whole time (which is what actually happened).

    7. Re:Couple of questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Actually, I asked the same question a couple of years ago when they actually put the new gigabit switches in. In point of fact, I was anticipating that they would run gigabit fiber to the dorms, or even to the switches on each floor, then run cat5e out to the rooms. The simple answer I've gotten from most people was that the fiberoptic lines were in place at that point in time anyway. Before we had gigabit, we had 192mbit ATM, so it was relatively easier to just replace the switches (instead of switches, wiring, and faceplates in each room).

      As far as the actual bandwidth, I've seen transfers from machine to machine (over ftp) top out at roughly 22 MB/s. In other words, not particularly worth it, really. I think the main benefit we saw was the quality of the switching compared to ATM, which made internal operations quite a bit smoother. But in regards to internet bandwidth, you're quite right -- to state that we have gigabit internet access is absolutely incorrect. In reality, or so I've been told, we had 54mbit access to the net split between all students by the end of this past school year (due to one of our major providers finally capping us).

      So yes, in short, the fiber connection is a ridiculous prospect, but it certainly makes for a great marketing gimmick that attracts quite a few nerds/geeks to the school.

    8. Re:Couple of questions by sklib · · Score: 1

      In particular, if you divide their bandwidth to the Internet

      Who says people are accessing the internet for EVERYTHING? One real convenient reason to have incredibly fast on-campus internet is so you can VNC into, or mount shares on your dorm room computer from any machine on campus, and not have to deal with slow-down.

      What about people who work with large data sets? I know this won't be a big thing for many undergrads, but it sure is nice to have a big pipe connecting your dorm room to your lab computer.

      Sure, most of this bandwidth will go to illegal p2p to the internet, and maybe that will slow down (unlikely -- universities tend to have pretty nice internet uplinks), but that doesn't mean there aren't legitimate internal uses for it.

      --
      -S
    9. Re:Couple of questions by mrjackson2000 · · Score: 1

      they are already part of I2

    10. Re:Couple of questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      could be used for bit-toorent stlye live video streaming

    11. Re:Couple of questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the actual intranet bandwidth is very good (though frankly I don't know if a difference between 50MB/s and 100MB/s would have more to do with computing speed than network speed).

      our internet connection is a pain in the ass. I don't really know how it's set up, other than we're sharing a pipe with about 5 large universities in Ohio. Sometimes it's really fast, sometimes it's really slow, and sometimes it drops. As far as reliability goes, i'd rather use my parent's DSL line.

      on a personal note, the stupid fiber NIC won't fit on my Mini-ITX board since it's a 64-bit card and hits the front panel switch connectors. the school used to hook us up with whatever equipment we needed, but now you pretty much have to figure stuff out for yourself.

    12. Re:Couple of questions by Anonymous+Custard · · Score: 1

      then the future is now! :-)

  18. Hmmm...SERVER FARM!!! by AppyPappy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    With that kind of pipe, you could enroll in school, get a dorm room and start your own ISP. That would pay for college and recoup that $250 for the card. Or even more for the router and such.

    --

    If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem

    1. Re:Hmmm...SERVER FARM!!! by martingunnarsson · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Fiber!=high bandwidth

      Lots of people seem to forget this.

      --
      Martin
    2. Re:Hmmm...SERVER FARM!!! by rice_web · · Score: 2, Informative

      Fiber != Static IP in each room

      --
      The Political Programmer
    3. Re:Hmmm...SERVER FARM!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah....10.1.200.132

    4. Re:Hmmm...SERVER FARM!!! by Student_Tech · · Score: 1

      Or at the college I am attending:
      high out going bandwidth(IE >1GB/day seems to be the cut off point) == turned off internet access and you get to attend a copyright seminar (unless they see that it was caused by a virus, in which it just needs to be cleaned up)
      get caught a 2nd time (non-virus related), internet turned off for 4 months (and you have to be attending, so no doing it in may and assuming you are off the hook when you get back from summer break in September)
      I can't remember if it is the 3rd or 4th time that you are banned from ever using your own computer (or at least one registered in your name) on the network.

      Or and on a side, while I was able to achieve about 800KB/sec my frosh year to the internet, they flipped on BW limiters and I now top off at 80KB/sec (yes, that first one is bytes), so while they may offer you high speed w/in campus, it might be slow accessing the general internet.

  19. Minimum my ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Those specs for minimum requirements are more like "according to our crtact with Dell/Apple..." I think you'd be fine without a flat panel monitor, screaming processor, and the 3-year warranty. As a college student, I'm not made of money, as I'm sure the students at this school aren't either. There is no reason a much less powerful can't connect to their system, maybe I'd be happy with a simple 20GB HDD instead of having 80GB to stash my pirated movies/music...

    1. Re:Minimum my ass by ACPosterChild · · Score: 1

      In '93, my $3000 486 66MHz DX/2, 16MB RAM, 340MB hard drive was top of the line. A friend of mine thought I confused my amount of RAM with my HD size when I told him how much RAM I had. When I graduated, PIIs with 128MB RAM and 2GB HD were commonplace.

      It's not quite so extreme now, of course. An older 1GHz/512MB/10GB will run anything will run school applications well enough (and is basically what I have at home and play good games on), but the idea is still true. Also, those are only the recommended systems. They do let students bring in older systems.

      The flat panel is recommended because of built-in desk space. The design used in the dorms isn't very condusive to monitors; 19" CRT monitors have to be put in a corner (due to the depth of the desk and the wall behind it), making the keyboard and mouse awkward to use, and 21" CRTs won't fit at all (due to the height of a built-in shelf above the desk). They've already broken ground for new dorms that will be more computer friendly, as opposed to the 1960's design the students are stuck with for now.

  20. why the need for this? by garcia · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I don't see the necessity for most of this stuff...

    512MB of RAM is understandable, 1GB is not necessary. College students should be doing research and writing papers. IE/Moz/etc and a word processor do not require that much RAM.

    A flat panel display is nice but not required. If they are going to ask for it why not just require a 19" LCD by Dell?

    HD sizes were a bit much... Shouldn't they limit them to 3GB or less so that they can't be downloading movies and music quite as much?

    The wireless is nice and I won't comment on that ;)

    Gigabit ethernet is nice but unnecessary. The Internet is only so fast. The campus network being blazing fast will only encourage file trading and MPAA/RIAA violations internally.

    1. Re:why the need for this? by TellarHK · · Score: 2, Insightful

      One gig of RAM isn't necessary? Geez, when's the last time you tried to load a FarCry map on Windows XP Pro with all the service packs and even just the minimal functional tray icon crap?

      I upgraded from 512M to 768M recently and the difference was just stunning. Trust me, a gig of RAM is most certainly not pushing the limits of human needs. It's pushing the limits of programmer inefficiency and incompetence, but it's not pushing it for actual users.

    2. Re:why the need for this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are not technical requirments. They recommand it because it maximizes the percentage they receive on each sale from there Dell/Apple e-store. If they download music/movies then the university gets a cut of the RIAA fees when the student is sued.

      They do all this in the name of profit.

    3. Re:why the need for this? by broohaha · · Score: 1

      I don't see the necessity for most of this stuff...

      Now, I haven't been back in school several years, but would this partly be so that students can be involved in the Internet2 project?

      Again, I don't know a whole lot about how students are allowed to be involved on a personal level, but Internet2 sounds like a plausible fit.

    4. Re:why the need for this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OMFG! Someone with a sense of humor! What are we to do? You other idiots need to get a life.

    5. Re:why the need for this? by iainl · · Score: 1

      Since when did Farcry's texture memory requirements affect how much memory was needed to do college work?

      The original poster's point was that the specs read like someone's idea of what made a nice machine, not what should be regarded as the minimum to get a connection working.

      I thoroughly agree that 1Gb of memory is a Nice Thing to have when your UT2K4 map is being slow, but if you're just writing essays its overkill.

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
    6. Re:why the need for this? by really? · · Score: 1

      All work and no play ... No?

      Damn, and I was in hog heaven when I managed to snag one of the early 1200 baud modems, connect to the university and get my e-mail "bang routed" through Bitnet and to a gateway to the other nets. The good old days of no spam...

      --

      "Consistency is contrary to nature, contrary to life. The only completely consistent people are the dead." A. Huxley
    7. Re:why the need for this? by meringuoid · · Score: 1
      The campus network being blazing fast will only encourage file trading and MPAA/RIAA violations internally.

      That's probably the idea. It's harder for the *AA police to prove anything about what happens on a local network, and it costs them nothing, unlike internet trading which sucks up a fortune in bandwidth.

      Who'll bother with transfers at maybe 128k from some internet system when they have access to everyone else's stuff at gigabit?

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    8. Re:why the need for this? by thedillybar · · Score: 2, Insightful
      College students should be doing research and writing papers.

      Did you happen to go to college?
      I can assure you that we college students do much more than research and paper writing. What we should (in your eyes) be doing doesn't matter.

      After having said that, my machine has a 1.3ghz Celeron w/ 512MB RAM and it works fine for everything (besides playing games). I often recommend cheaper systems, not top-of-the-line, to friends looking for new machines. Most machines are ridiculously overpowered, which is fine if you don't mind blowing the extra money.

    9. Re:why the need for this? by frs_rbl · · Score: 1

      Gigabit ethernet is nice but unnecessary

      Wait a few years, and Longhorn will require 10 Gigabit Ethernet... and you'll be thankful to your Campus which only demanded 1 Gigabit!

      --
      This is not my opinion. Actually, it's not even an opinion. And I'm nowhere to be seen near it
    10. Re:why the need for this? by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

      College students should be doing research and writing papers

      Thats not what college is for! research and work are things you do the night before. Maybe 2 if its important. And while playing high-spec games that you downloaded off your gigabit connection isnt exactly what college is about either, it does play a roll too.

      --
      This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
    11. Re:why the need for this? by aldoman · · Score: 1

      SO you think that college students should never be able to play games and should instead be either sleeping, watching lecutres or doing research and writing papers 24/7. That's stupid - if they want to play some video games when they are at college, why the bloody hell not?!

      PS: Textures are stored in video memory on the graphics card and not in regular RAM.

    12. Re:why the need for this? by reidbold · · Score: 1
      No! Remember
      HD sizes were a bit much... Shouldn't they limit them to 3GB or less so that they can't be downloading movies and music quite as much?
      So you couldn't even install FarCry.

      Garcia is our dictator! Listen to him or be smitten.
      --
      -Reid
    13. Re:why the need for this? by morganjharvey · · Score: 1

      The campus network being blazing fast will only encourage file trading and MPAA/RIAA violations internally.

      This is the best reason, aside from sheer naivete, that they would take the default configurations for the macs (at least for the 17" PowerBook and the G5) of a SuperDrive, which includes the DVD-R, and replace with the ComboDrive. I'm also curious about why you need a 15" screen minimum -- what about those nifty 12" powerbooks?

    14. Re:why the need for this? by KirkH · · Score: 1

      No, he's saying that these so-called "minimum" requirements are a load of bollocks. Parents who don't know better will just look at these requirements and drop $2.5k on a new machine when they could have gotten something much, much cheaper to do the job. Are you suggesting that colleges should recommend only machines that can run the latest and greatest games?

    15. Re:why the need for this? by NexusTw1n · · Score: 2, Informative
      HD sizes were a bit much... Shouldn't they limit them to 3GB or less so that they can't be downloading movies and music quite as much?
      You're talking about a PC that is just used for word processing papers. But you are out badly of touch with today's modern world.

      Student presentations these days don't involve standing in front of an OHP talking. A lot of students use PowerPoint, embedded sound and video clips, digital photographs and so forth.
      Students use a full range of media when doing course work. At least they do in the UK, and I mean all courses not just media. IT and art based ones.
      Which means they need far more than 3GB of drive space. And they need plenty of RAM for video editing and PhotoShop.

      As for gigabit networks being unneccessary apart from trading warez. I assume you also aren't aware that many campuses offer streaming facilities for lectures, allowing you to watch lectures again, or catch up on ones you missed? A few dozen students streaming lectures during revision week will soon soak up that gigabit of bandwidth.
      --
      It has become appallingly obvious that our technology has exceeded our humanity. --Albert Einstein
    16. Re:why the need for this? by TellarHK · · Score: 1

      It's not just texture memory FarCry uses that takes so long - We're talking minute plus load times on some maps for the first time through on some systems that meet spec for the game at all. Yeah, the concept of needing 1G of RAM as a requirement for connecting to the network is damn silly, but I was responding to the "1GB is overkill" portion of the parent post. It's not overkill by any means if you're doing things like gaming, or even 3D design work as part of a college course. Most students won't need that. But then, most students shouldn't need gigabit fiber either.

      In my opinion, the specs for college systems intended to be used for actual WORK should be pretty reasonable for all but the students involved in computer science or other disciplines that require number crunching.

      A one gigahertz box with 256M of RAM and your pick of Linux distros or Windows 98 with a 100Mbit connection to a shared T3 for the entire campus. It was fine in 1999, it's fine now.

    17. Re:why the need for this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I got to CWRU in 2001, requirements were a 1.4GHz P4 minimum w/ 20GB HD, and 256MB RAM. The specs on the computer I got were: 1.0GHz P3, 20GB HD, 256MB RAM. Even now, I know people using celeron 500's w/ 128MB RAM, and they do just fine. So, I would say the minimum requirements for getting work done (and having some fun) would be: 1GHz (enough power to do most things), 256MB or 512MB RAM, 20GB HD (OS eats at least 1GB of that, with all the software you'll need--and that's available on the software center--you might have 10GB free to do your work, put games on, and some mp3s).

    18. Re:why the need for this? by CFTM · · Score: 1

      $2500? On those minimum requirements? Are you kidding? I can get a dell machine that meet those requirements for under 1000. I could probably build my own system from scratch for 1200-1400 for those specs ... shop at better places :p

    19. Re:why the need for this? by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 1

      Mod me down all you want nerds, but that's the truth. College is about socializing and adjusting to real life. If you're spending your time writing papers then you're missing out.

    20. Re:why the need for this? by iainl · · Score: 1

      I'm not saying that students shouldn't be able to have a box that nice, merely that listing it as a minimum, when so many people have boxes well below that spec and so don't really need to upgrade to do their work is a blatant abuse of power to promote buying a new Dell or Apple unnecessarily.

      P.S. the game stores the textures for it in real memory as well - otherwise the game wouldn't run at all on my poor 'little' 64Mb card, when total texture data for a level is far above that.

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
  21. What about laptops? by TellarHK · · Score: 1, Informative

    I know this would be the first problem that came to mind for me. How will people be forced to deal with the problem that there's probably not a single laptop out there that has fiber gigabit in it? Of course, my Powerbook has gigabit copper on it, as does my recently upgraded motherboard. So there're two gigabit units that wouldn't be able to work here. There's a time and place where backwards compatibility has to be maintained, and most certainly a time to ditch it. It seems to me that we're about a decade away from fiber being the most efficient and effective way to push gigabit to the dorm room.

    1. Re:What about laptops? by cpgeek · · Score: 1

      with a media converter (which was reccomended) one can use copper gigabit... one plugs one end of the media converter into the fiber, the other into shielded cat5e to a copper gigabit device... it's easy, and for the bandwidth, relitively inexpensive.

      --
      May the coffee god Smile upon you!
    2. Re:What about laptops? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least when I lived in the dorms, you could request (for free) a fiber-copper converter unit.

    3. Re:What about laptops? by whelck · · Score: 1

      Most new laptops have an option for gig ethernet on board. We just got a few new Dells in at work and they all have gig ethernet built in.

    4. Re:What about laptops? by Dachannien · · Score: 1
    5. Re:What about laptops? by Diamon · · Score: 1
      RTFP (yeah the post you don't even have to read the article)
      All students have access to over 16,000 fiber ports throughout the university plus 802.11g campus-wide
      Why would you want to tie yourself down with wires if you have free access to 802.11g everywhere?
    6. Re:What about laptops? by TellarHK · · Score: 1

      Because wireless is not gigabit. :) Wireless is great, yes. However, in a school environment maybe it would be enough. I know for my LAN at home, streaming video from a server machine and synchronizing iTunes libraries over the network is a bit sluggish on wireless, though most dorm residents won't be running servers - and those that do will be able to slap on switches off a server PC and 10/100/1000 copper.

  22. Old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is old news. What do you want, a cookie?

    Thanks to you, alertpopes, expect all the RIT people to come out of the woodwork and clamor for themselves to be noticed, because they're a tech school too. Just what we unassuming Case people needed...way to go.

  23. Um... about that Yahoo survey... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    While Case does have a lot going for it in this regard, please disregard that Yahoo story; Yahoo's 'research' into that reward was done by distributing surveys to the various institutions, and it's widely known that the VP in charge of ITS at the time 'won' CWRU that rank by lying through his teeth. Here's a reference, look near the bottom: http://www.onecleveland.org/Observer%204-9-04.htm.

    1. Re:Um... about that Yahoo survey... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a former student, I'll back this up and state that the administration at CWRU has a history of lying through their teeth.

  24. why do you need a media converter? by Squeezer · · Score: 2

    shouldn't all you need be a fiber gigabit NIC and the proper fiber SC or ST (depending on what they use) patch cable?

    --
    Does the name Pavlov ring a bell?
    1. Re:why do you need a media converter? by Detritus · · Score: 1

      For more than one computer, it would be cheaper and simpler to use the media converter with a copper gigabit switch and NICs for local distribution. Plus, I can buy copper gigabit hardware and cabling off the shelf at COMPUSA. I've yet to see fiber based products in any local stores.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
  25. Re:obligatory by Patrik_AKA_RedX · · Score: 5, Funny
    yeah, students with gigabit 'net connection, now that must be good for grades.
    It is, if you can see 3 hours worth of porn in under 5 minutes. That does leave you another 2h50 minutes of extra time to study.

    (For those who're about to point out that 3 houres minus 5 minutes equals 2h 55 minutes: I assume 5 minutes to clean up. I mean, you do wash your hands afterwarts, right?)
  26. Large intranet bandwidth attracts RIAA attention? by AgTiger · · Score: 1

    How long before someone at the RIAA connects the dots and realizes that Case Western Reserve University's high-bandwidth intranet is a target rich environment for subpoenas and potential lawsuits against file-sharers allegedly infringing on their members' copyrights?

    It's not like they require the song sharing to take place over the internet in order to go after people...

  27. Old news by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 1

    CWRU has had its fiber network since the 1980's or early 90's at the latest. I imagine they've probably gone through some expansion and upgrading in the intervening years, but back when I was looking at colleges this was one of the features they touted highly during the campus tour.

    --
    You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
  28. so who will ever need more than.... by millahtime · · Score: 4, Funny

    And no one will ever need more than 640k.

    1. Re:so who will ever need more than.... by ForestGrump · · Score: 1

      i thought it was 9600 bps

      -Grump

      --
      Is it true that more people vote for the winner of American Idol, than vote for the president? -Ali G.
  29. Case adminstration... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    The fiber gig network isn't good for anything but downloading porn from the guy down the hall. For awhile now Case has paid for a 45 mbit outbound connection, but the provider never actually enforced the cap. They started enforcing it towards the end of the spring semester and everything slowed to a crawl. Gig is great, but before I left campus for summer I never got more than a few kbit for most downloads.

  30. Mmmmmm..... Bandwidth...... by jenohn · · Score: 1

    obligatory text added to defeat lameness filter.

  31. Really Old News (16 years old) by regen · · Score: 5, Informative

    CWRU has had fiber to every dorm room on campus since 1988 (yes, 16 years ago).

    I was a student there when they installed it. Most of the academic building where wired in 1987, dorms in 1988 (at least 6 pair to every room) and off campus housing (e.g Fraternities and Sororities) in 1989 and 1990.

    In 1988, the campus bookstore would loan you an ethernet card and a fiber transceiver (I believe at that time it was 10Mb/s, a precursor to the 10BaseFL standard).

  32. What exactly is the point? by Beowulf_Boy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    What exactly CAN they do with it? Yeah, they are gonna get unbelievable bandwidth inside, but not many students do much other than surf the web.

    The internet connection is going to be the choke point. They probably have an OC3, just like Miami, UC, and my school, Shawnee State.

    The only thing I see this as useful for is internal transmissions to do things like reghost computers at boot. But they won't be doing those in students dorms.

    the 802.11g though, is awsome. I would give my left nut to have that all over campus here.

    1. Re:What exactly is the point? by Dachannien · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually, we have an OC12 to our service provider's PoP, with commodity Internet capped at 45Mb/s (usually pegged during the afternoons and evenings when the dorms are occupied) and (afaik) uncapped Internet 2 which usually sits around 18Mb/s.

    2. Re:What exactly is the point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they can use it for p2p stlye live video streaming of classes or something

    3. Re:What exactly is the point? by waveclaw · · Score: 1

      Actually, we have an OC12 to our service provider's PoP

      Sweet! What's you IP block again?

      with commodity Internet capped at 45Mb/s

      Darn. Here I was hoping to setup the monster of all zombie-host farms. I guess all those clueless freshmen and their (University Approved) WinTel PC's are going to have to live without a little slammer action.

      You've broke my little Win32 worm's heart with all that talk of bandwidth. Do you even know how much it costs to pay for counciling for emotionally-challenged software? Poor thing will be depressed for weeks.

      --

      "You cannot have a General Will unless you have shared experiences. You cannot be fair to people you don't know."
    4. Re:What exactly is the point? by ACPosterChild · · Score: 1

      1) Incoming connections are blocked.

      2) Students can get a routable IP address, but only if they request one.

      So, most of the clueless MS-using no-patch installing idiots aren't directly reachable. Of course, this doesn't completely stop the worms from getting in, and once they're in they still mess things up.

  33. The one drawback is by Timesprout · · Score: 2, Funny

    they spent so much money on the fibre all the servers are hand me down Sinclair ZX81's.

    --
    Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
    What truth?
    There is no dupe
  34. University of Delaware by The-Bus · · Score: 3, Informative

    Couple of links:

    100 Most Wired, 1999
    100 Most Wired, 2000 (Case Western drops off the list)

    The University of Delaware moved up to #2... then their network was brought to its knees due to file sharing (presumably it fell off the list in 2001).

    What really surprises me is that "traditional" tech universities don't hold the top spots.

    Disclaimer: UD alumn

    --

    Small potatoes make the steak look bigger.

    1. Re:University of Delaware by joib · · Score: 4, Insightful


      What really surprises me is that "traditional" tech universities don't hold the top spots.


      Perhaps because they rather spend their money on teaching instead of all kinds of frivolous stuff.

    2. Re:University of Delaware by battlinbill · · Score: 1

      Ahhh, the memories of UD's network. I graduated from there in '99 and if it wasn't for the network there, I don't think I'd ever have gotten broadband or decided to work in the networking field.

      Right now I'm at the University of Pittsburgh, which is supposedly a "sister" school - I can say that the network here bites compared to UD's back then.

      This was a pointless post ;)

    3. Re:University of Delaware by The-Bus · · Score: 1

      I was a bit spoiled by UD's network and simply assumed other schools had the same. Meanwhile, my friend at Rutgers was, ahem, dialing in from his on-campus dorm for access..!

      I could dial-in from anywhere in Delaware (or anywhere I felt like paying long-distance charges). Basically, UD also offered itself as a free ISP so when I was home on vacation I had an "always on" 28.8-56kbps-ish connection.

      --

      Small potatoes make the steak look bigger.

    4. Re:University of Delaware by Geoff-with-a-G · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Most of the smartest and most learned people I know in tech fields picked up the bulk of their expertise from personal projects, not academic curricula.

      This is not to knock college education; I think mine was invaluable. But don't just write off everything other than teaching as "frivolous". The ones who really learn are the ones who are driven to do it on their own. All they need is an environment that empowers them to do so, not someone to hold their hand or push them along.

      Also, what you think of as "traditional" tech universities are probably known for the prestige of their technical grad studies, not necessarily the quality of their undergraduate educational environment.

    5. Re:University of Delaware by Chris+Pimlott · · Score: 1

      The Most Wired ranking criteria are sort of silly and don't make a whole lot of sense. For example, they rate you both on how many computer labs you have and what percentage of students own computers. But if most of your students own computers, why do they need labs? If there are labs in each dorm and they're open 24/7, not as many of your students will buy computers.

      It's a pretty silly award, and it's really not much of a reflection on how "with-it" a school is. Not a big surprise you don't see the real tech school leaders on the list; they're doing new things that the survey doesn't even know to look for.

    6. Re:University of Delaware by roror · · Score: 1

      What really surprises me is that "traditional" tech universities don't hold the top spots. What do you think of Carnegie Mellon University? #1 in 2000.

    7. Re:University of Delaware by pavon · · Score: 1

      Or more likely, they laid networking infrastructure long before all these other schools, and are waiting until it becomes worthwhile to upgrade before pulling it all up and rewiring.

  35. I'm surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't believe the negative responses to this. In 10 years they will need every last bit of the bandwidth of Fiber (Voice/Video/Teleportation)When everyone is saying "WHY?", we should be saying "WHY NOT?".

  36. A lot of traffic will stay inside campus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    greetings from bandwidth-uni: utwente.nl

  37. Re:Over-wired? and tooo far ahead of the curve by Merlin42 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Is there any real reason to put fiber all the way to the dorm room? The main advantage of fiber over copper is that it can run MUCH longer distances, but it is more expensive and difficult to work with. Why not just run the fiber b/w buildings and then put copper gigabit switches in the buildings so students can use commodity gigabit ethernet adapters? My guess is that they were so far ahead of the curve(CWRU has always been overwired) that they started the upgrade to all fiber before copper gigabit was a viable option and are now stuck with all the extra fiber going to the dorm rooms, causing the students to have to make extra purchases to interface with the less common fiber .

  38. i get it by millahtime · · Score: 1

    Because the school is in Ohio they needed some new attraction. What other reason is there to go to Ohio for?

    1. Re:i get it by mjpaci · · Score: 1

      Cedar Point is a good reason to visit Ohio. There's also The Pro Football Hall of Fame and The USAF Museum.

  39. I went there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I went to CWRU from 95 - 00. The fiber to the dorm room system has been in place since the early 90's. First it ran on 10Mbit cards, then, while I was there they decided not to move to 100Mbit ethernet but rather to move to 155Mbit ATM. The ATM trasition was a disaster. It was hugely expensive to use the Fore systems cards (at $1500 a pop). Not only that, Fore had never done a deployment on that scale before. One of my friends who worked for network services told me that Fore had never tested their system on a network larger then 100 computers before it was deployed on our campus. The students who moved over to the ATM system immediately suffered from daily network outages. The Network services people were loading new drivers from Fore into the switches on a weekly basis trying to stabilize the system. All that money only to tear it all out again to upgrade to GigE. Yes it is a waste of money.

    1. Re:I went there by eggboard · · Score: 1

      What I get from reading this thread is that the university switched to gigabit fiber because they had installed a fiber optic network for the wrong reasons and are now stuck with a fiber infrastructure. Instead of eating the costs in some way of letting students on the network, like providing one adapter per room or floor, they're distributing the cost onto each student.

      --
      Freelance tech journalist for the Economist, MIT Technology Review, Macworld, and others
  40. Holy crap, since when is this news?! by Dachannien · · Score: 5, Informative

    We've had fiber to the desktop since 1989!

    As for that Yahoo award? Ray Neff, former IT director at CWRU (but now cursing Berkeley with his presence) was responsible for bringing ATM to the desktop in the mid-late '90s, which was widely regarded as a disaster. The Yahoo's most wired campus award? Well, the results of that were based solely on a survey submitted to Yahoo by each campus's IT director. Many of the answers that CWRU submitted on that survey were exaggerations, while others were simply untrue. Neff left the university around the same time that a University audit detected about half a million dollars in misplaced department funds, and while no guilt was ever placed or admitted, I'll let you connect the dots.

    Since those "glory years", however, we've ditched ATM on the desktop, and better yet, we no longer have the world's largest flat-topology IP network (back in the day, a few people playing unpatched Doom 1 could bring the network to its knees due to the use of broadcast packets). Instead, we have gigabit over fiber, and Intel has ranked us the 4th most unwired campus as well.

    Still, this is hardly *news* to anyone. It's been like this here for a long time.

    1. Re:Holy crap, since when is this news?! by d-rock · · Score: 1

      ATM to the desktop never worked as well as it could have, but I wouldn't call it a disaster. A lot of the issues we had were with FORE's equipment not being able to handle the size of our network. Over Christmas break '99 I was in charge of upgrading the ATM network from FORE's proprietary ATM routing protocols to the industry-standard PNNI and things broke in very, very strange ways. We ended up having to completely back out of the upgrade and wait several months for FORE to fix its firmware.
      As for the whole flat/subnetted topology, I'm sure someone like Dave or Jeff could explain this better, but my understanding was that in the early days (up to the mid-late 90s) router performance would have been a large bottleneck on the network. That's why they waited until high-performance L3 switches were commonly available before undertaking the project.

      Derek

      --
      Don't Panic...
    2. Re:Holy crap, since when is this news?! by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

      Ya I've never quite been sure what the obsession with fibre to the desktop is, or ATM on campus networks. We played the ATM game too a few years ago, basically for the same reason as you (retarded IT director). He went around to everyone asking about ATM, all who said no until he finally found a yes man. Lots of money and a Cisco 12000 later, and the backbone was ATM (backbone only). Well that worked like not at all and ended up with the campus going down when the router blew up and there was no redundancy. Now it's all redundant layer-3 switched ethernet and MUCH faster and more reliable (not to mention low latency).

      I think some IT people just get caught up in buzzwords without understanding what they are and go off and implement dumb-ass solutions. I'm sure all your freshman are SO happy about their gigabit connection when they discover the $200+ dent it is going to make in their wallet.

      Oh well, this Yahoo shit just goes to show that even stupid decisions can get their day in the sun. Maybe next time we do something to fuck up our network I'll have to try and get us in the running.

    3. Re:Holy crap, since when is this news?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well duh, it's because timothy is an editor. He has a really really high "dupe" posting rate, and lots of mistakes. (Check the front page for all the corrections he's had to make just *TODAY*.) Real editors don't edit after-the-fact; they're supposed to check validity and do corrections BEFORE posting it to the front page.

      fire timothy already...

    4. Re:Holy crap, since when is this news?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We've had fiber to the desktop since 1989!

      Not all of us have had access to fiber for that long. I finally just got fiber Internet/TV (skipped on phone service - atleast for time being) through surewest.net and it kicks ass. After searching for some press releases, I found that they are using some Cisco equipment that can (or might already have been) upgraded to Gigabit in the future, when needed. But for the time being, 10Mbps Internet Access will do for me.

  41. I'm curious if it will even be used by digitalgimpus · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My school, as well as where I work both use 10Mbps connections.

    Due to uplink, and most people only using the internet... no advantage for anything faster. I'll perhaps on the internal servers use up to 8Mbps.

    But are they really going to use all that bandwidth? Is there 1000Mbps connectivity to the outside world? Do they have a reason for it internally?

    Or is it just to make /.?

    I'm seriously curious.

    I could see a physics, or comp sci dept. upgrading it's labs to Gigabit, internally. But campus wide? That strikes me as just a media stunt to sound like a good comp sci. school.

    Gigabit Hotmail/and AIM? Sounds a bit excessive.

    I'd bet the average connection from a dorm is under 3Mbps.

    1. Re:I'm curious if it will even be used by benna · · Score: 1

      The only people that will really use all the bandwidth will be students running warez sites high up in the scene. Nobody else will. They must know this and be OK with it or they wouldn't have bothered.

      --
      "It is not how things are in the world that is mystical, but that it exists." -Ludwig Wittgenstein
  42. Not a good education by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Hopefully, I can try and clarify some things before a lot of bright students decide to attend college at CWRU. I am a former student of CWRU, and, to be honest, I wish I wasn't. The Comp-Sci/Engineering school sucks and many of the professors could care less about teaching and take great pride in degrading their students. I've had a math professor berate a friend of mine and constantly call him stupid... yes, the professor was dead serious when he said it and the student almost committed suicide. I had another friend, with a 1600 SAT fail out because he hated the school and the professors there.

    The administration had lied to me personally about transfer credit and tuition related policies and made promises I should have gotten in writing because they failed to keep them. Hell, according to friend I had in the department, the comp-sci program was in jeopardy of losing its accreditation a few years ago. Finally, don't plan on getting sick, being forced to take a semester off for surgery, and having your ~$20-30k tuition reimbursed. A friend had to leave school in order to have surgery done and they failed to reimburse her... even after promising that they would.

    CWRU has a habit of using their network to lure bright students in. For the Yahoo! ratings, the university lied about the network hardware and other computer programs in place and essentially ended up raising tuition to cover their tracks. I could write an entire book about my problems and troubles at CWRU. Still, most would likely view me as a troll or someone who is bitter at the university for some reason. So I guess I've said all I can.

    Trust me, if you want a quality education at a school where professors and administration care, avoid Case Western Reserve University at all costs. If you don't believe me and attend the school anyway, just remember that you were warned.

    1. Re:Not a good education by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I graduated from CWRU in 2002 with a B.S. in Astronomy. Yes, the comp-sci department at CWRU has some problems, but overall the education I received from CWRU was fabulous. (Most of my classes were in the physics and astronomy departments.) Not only was I able to go to pretty much any graduate school I wanted, but when I got there I was very well prepared. (So much so that some of the grad classes were kind of boring.) If you're looking to go college somewhere where you'll get an excellent background in a subject and do cutting edge research, I would highly recommend CWRU. If you're looking to slack off and party, go somewhere else.

    2. Re:Not a good education by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I also attended CWRU (1993 - 97) for a Comp E. degree. The department was pathetic. Broken equipment, lack of machines, no money for repairs or replacements, the list goes on. The professors were (with the exception of one or two) completely stuck in their ways. New technologies or languages (think Java!) were ignored.
      By 1996 - 97, the department was put on probation. The next year (just after my graduation) the school no longer had an accredited Computer Engineering/Science offering. Instead, it was combined with the EE department.
      Sad... really really sad.

    3. Re:Not a good education by Animats · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I went to Case from 1966-1970. Back then, they offered a good, solid engineering education, but they were already in decline. Case was the only school ever kicked off the ARPAnet. They had an ARPAnet connection in the late 1960s and lost it because they didn't perform on some contracts.

      Computing at Case took a wierd turn. In 1968, the school spun off the CS department as a private company, called Chi Corporation. Chi operated as a computer service bureau, developed their own operating system, and sold CPU time to the university and its students. (Chi went through a long series of mergers and selloffs. At one point its major business was school-bus scheduling).

    4. Re:Not a good education by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget the gender related issues they have going on in the faculty!

    5. Re:Not a good education by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amen Brother. CWRU; 1995-2000; BS in CompSci. It's good that our department is so bad, it forces the students to learn on their own -- Lee White I'm not making that up. Needless to say, I don't donate.

    6. Re:Not a good education by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like you had some of the same issues that I had with Case. I was a comp sci major there from 94-98 and I ended up having to transfer out to graduate b/c the advising in the department was so incompetent that they never communicated to me certain requirements for graduation. My GPA was awful there - around a 2.0. After I transferred, my GPA shot up to a 3.7.

      But the Internet connection did rock. :)

    7. Re:Not a good education by seifried · · Score: 1
      CWRU has a habit of using their network to lure bright students in.

      If you went to a university based on the IP network available then you can't have been to bright.

    8. Re:Not a good education by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Way to pick out a single sentence and use it out of context. I agree that it's stupid to select a school based on a network technology, but the point is that CWRU attempts to mislead prospective students. This is done by portraying the school as existing on the cutting edge of technology and research... a place where only the best technology is used by the best instructors which results in the best education. Why else would they bother lying on the Yahoo! survey or issuing what amounts to a press release on /. like they did today? The fact remains that campus connectivity and computer technology IS something that is taken into account when reviewing prospective schools and CWRU knows this all too well.

    9. Re:Not a good education by ACPosterChild · · Score: 1

      I also had problems with professors promising things they didn't have the authority to (like saying I could in the class after drop/add was done, and transfer out of the advanced course at any time). Luckily, I talked to the Dean (Robinson, I think), and got things worked out. It took a few visits and me repeatedly saying that, yes, I now know it's against the policy, but at the time my Prof told me it was OK, so why should I think I needed to check with anybody else?

      The only professor I've heard of that openly berates students is Liteman (probably spelled wrong). He's a Jewish (only mentioned to narrow down any confusion as to who I might be talking about, since he wears his yarmukle all the time) math professor. To sum him up, and for the record, he eats babies.
      (I only had him for one day when he subbed in one of my math classes. He knew what we were covering, deliberately went way beoynd it, asked students questions on theory that he'd just mentioned and not explained, and then called the whole class stupid. All I can figure is that he learned the whole of mathematics straight through in a week by reading a few books and never having to study or do exampls, and considers anyone who can't do that to be an idiot. That, or he's devil spawn.)

      Yes, you DO need to get everything in writing. Then, you have a CHANCE of getting things straight. Their problem is that one person, who doesn't actually have the final authority or even necessarily know the University's rules, will tell you one thing. Then, you go somewhere else, just to finalize some paperwork or something, and get told that you're SOL. Even different levels of administration within a department (say, housing) will tell you different things.

      I've heard a story about somebody who got sick and / or depressed and took a semester off and had trouble getting re-imbursed (or never did). The problem was that the family hadn't told the university in a timely manner and hadn't cleared out the room, so most of the semester was already over. But, even if you did things right, I could see having problems, especially with one person saying it was OK and then being told by somebody else that it wasn't.

  43. two words: innovation and time by gosand · · Score: 1
    Whose HD can constantly suck up more than a 100 MB pipe? (Don't quote me some Sandra benchmark off a gamerz site, here) And if 100 people in a dorm are all "on fiber" and the dorm has "fiber" to the campus core router, which has "fiber" somewhere else, at what point does the bandwidth get divided down below 100 MBit anyway? You're not going to get more than that, why run expensive fiber when you can run cheapo Cat 5, and put the phones on the unused pairs as well? The math doesn't work here.

    How do you innovate? You give fiber connections to a bunch of college kids with nothing better to do than to play with it in their spare time.

    Now they probably really did this because they got a good deal on it, and because it is a good investment in the future. It might be overkill today, but it might lead to innovations. It is kind of like the monkeys/typewriters/Shakespeare thing.

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

    1. Re:two words: innovation and time by Gothmolly · · Score: 1

      There already ARE a million monkeys hammering away on a million typewriters, and AOL is nothing like Shakespeare.

      By your logic, we can cure the ills of the Third World simply by throwing money at their problems. Oh wait...

      I went to college, this will get used for warez, pr0n, and Kazaa, nothing more. One kid will keep saying things like "But imagine a Beowulf cluster, we could make a cluster out of the whole dorm!" and hand out Kloppix CDs, which the rest of the dorm will use as coasters under their bongs.

      They may have gotten a good deal on this, which means that the vendors can write off an artificially high "price" as a donation, and it means that someone's friend who is a wiring contractor ends up with a new boat.

      --
      I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
    2. Re:two words: innovation and time by dpilot · · Score: 1

      > million monkeys
      Nobody ever told the REAL problem with the million monkeys experiment. You have to sift through the results. For all we know, there really IS a Shakespear somewhere on AOL, just unrecognized.

      > throwing money
      Aaahh, the law of the excluded middle. Obviously throwing money at a problem won't solve it. So we then do the obvious, and refuse to apply any money. Simply throwing money will *probably* never work, but by the same token, most problems will not be solved *without* money. Knowing *how* to apply money, and *how much* money to apply is the hard part. Unfortunately, we're paying some people the big bucks, and they don't appear to have answers to either of those questions.

      > warez, pr0n, etc
      For 99% of the students you're right. In any given year, the number may even be 100%. But we're playing Sturgeon's Law here. Once every couple of years, *someone* is going to do something really neat with that bandwidth, and hopefully that's worth all of the warez and pr0n.

      > good deal, boats
      Most of the time cynicism is justified. The tiny chunk of optimist in my hopes it isn't 100%.

      --
      The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    3. Re:two words: innovation and time by gosand · · Score: 1
      There already ARE a million monkeys hammering away on a million typewriters, and AOL is nothing like Shakespeare.

      Ahh, but you have to realize that the monkeys don't JUST produce Shakespeare. :-)

      By your logic, we can cure the ills of the Third World simply by throwing money at their problems. Oh wait...

      In the words of Neo, when he saw an unbelievable jump - whoa.

      I went to college, this will get used for warez, pr0n, and Kazaa, nothing more. One kid will keep saying things like "But imagine a Beowulf cluster, we could make a cluster out of the whole dorm!" and hand out Kloppix CDs, which the rest of the dorm will use as coasters under their bongs.

      Sounds like a great school. I have no doubts that it will get used for those things, but it is quite a pessimistic view to think that nobody will figure out a novel and interesting use for it beyond that. You can only get so much pr0n, warez, and music before you have to wonder what else you can do with it.

      --

      My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

    4. Re:two words: innovation and time by Gothmolly · · Score: 1

      The "law of the excluded middle" that you quote is valid, but there is an associated fallacy, which you do not claim I committed. I'm unsure of your point here.
      Invoking Sturgeon's law is "throwing money at the problem" - you're just assuming that eventually something will happen, and you leave out the _somehow_.

      --
      I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
    5. Re:two words: innovation and time by dpilot · · Score: 1

      Not accusing you of this, but many who denigrate 'throwing money at the problem' then neglect any solution whatsoever. It leaves me with the feeling that they are willing to continue neglecting the problem, as long as they get to conserve their money. IMHO it's ridiculous to presume that any arbitrary problem can be solved without money, it's a matter of finding a good solution that doesn't waste money.

      I wasn't invoking Sturgeon's Law against 'throwing money', but rather against 'warez and pr0n'. I was saying that 98+% of that high-bandwidth would be warez and pr0n, but there would be maybe 1 student every other year or so who would do something really valuable with all of that bandwidth.

      --
      The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
  44. LCD by Detritus · · Score: 1

    A flat panel LCD saves a huge amount of room when compared to a CRT display. An important issue for people being housed in tiny (that's redundant) dorm rooms. Plus, they save on energy costs.

    --
    Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
  45. Re:Large intranet bandwidth attracts RIAA attentio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I went to Case (they changed their name from CWRU) back in '91 and provided all the hardware for free back then. It was great for playing 8 player Warcraft 2. The best part was it was right as MP3s got started and so the files were going back and forth like crazy. Not to mention things like hotline, AOL hacking, etc. They even had their Xerox machines networked and we used to dump our systems to the internal copier's hard drives to do backups.

    As I was on my way out, they had upgraded everyone to ATM@the desk. It blew at first, but after a couple driver changes, it was like having your own pipe.

  46. Re:with all this technology you would think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
  47. Support issue by ALecs · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Actually, (hate to burst your conspiracy theory) this is probably a support issue rather than a kickback or other nefarious scheme.

    I worked campus tech support at Virginia Tech. VT's engineering school recommended IBM machines (and back then this was reasonable) and there was a very good reason for it: we had an IBM shop on-site. You could get SAME DAY repair on your IBM if anything went wrong. You just carted it down to the EE shop, filled out a form and check back that afternoon - usually it was fixed.

    Same for the math department - they used Apples and had an apple shop in the lab. If something broke in the lab, I just unplugged it and carted it upstairs. No shipping, no carriers to damage the equipment further, no waiting. Just leave it by the door with a sticky note.

    Oh - and bulk discounts are always nice for the students. Pre-order your machine and save $$$!

    For the record, though, I didn't buy an IBM when I enrolled. I build my own. :)

    1. Re:Support issue by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      Actually, I think my theory is still valid. I mean, I'm sure the university got some sort of deal for allowing the IBM/Apple shop to be on your campus. I mean, if its on campus and provides incentives for people to have those brands of computers (ie. simple repairs, bulk discounts), I would be almost certain that the company would pay the university something for that, or arrange some other type of deal.

      So yes, it MAY be convenient for repairs, but I don't see how there ISN'T some partnership type deal going on here in either scenario.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    2. Re:Support issue by Hungus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      At least for Apple, it is not uncommon for a campus to have a mac shop if there are enough macs located there. Apple doesn't treat them any differently than any other mac shop, rather it is something the campus requests and they have to pay their own techs.

      --
      Bad Panda! No Bamboo for you! In matters of importance ACs will not be responded to. Want to say something critical,OK
    3. Re:Support issue by ALecs · · Score: 1
      Oh - there is definetly a partnership going on to the mutual benefit of both the Univ. and the vendor. But I know it costs the school money to have that PC shop on-site; the school isn't making money off of it.

      What they are doing is saving money by reducing the cost of support contracts for both students and labs. Maybe some uber-school with awesome contacts may swing a deal to get a piece of every computer students buy, but certainly not VT.

      When students have their own computers, schools can reduce the number of labs they have to maintain. Once VT required ALL incoming freshmen to have a computer, they eliminated all the labs in the dorms and many of the labs in the non-engineering and non-CompSci buildings. That's a HUGE cost reduction for the school.

      When students' PCs are not working they go to labs. So - keeping students' PCs working saves the school money since they can keep the labs small.

  48. Record Breaking... by Choachy · · Score: 1

    Yes, because before they couldnt download Gain, Gator, and Bonzai Buddy fast enough. "Just wait til you see the blazingly fast speeds of Kazaa and porn downloads."

  49. Looks familiar by Monoman · · Score: 1
    --
    Keep the Classic Slashdot.
  50. I've seen a lot of overreacting here by magefile · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Number one: yes, they *recommend* Dell or Apple. Why not? It's not a requirement, and for folks who don't care what they have, it's advice that'll help them get better support from the college help desk.

    Number two: yes, $200+ for the adapter is pricey. But split it with your roommate and it becomes $100. Sell it (jointly) to the next sucker in your room, and you only spend maybe $20 each on it. Or do what I'd do: screw wired and go with 802.11g, which is campus wide anyway. On those few occasions you're d'ling a distro or whatever, go down to the computer labs and jack into their ethernet, or borrow an extra port on a friend's adapter.

    1. Re:I've seen a lot of overreacting here by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 1

      The problem is, we're the only ones who will realize that a "recommendation" is just that, a recommendation. When some n00b parent is trying to decide what gear to buy for their kid, they'll treat the "recommendation" as though it were handed down from Mt. Siani.

      The recommendations are such ridiculous overkill, I don't even know where to begin. Their minimum desktop system is better than any of the four computers in my house. The worst of my computers (800MHz P3 with 256MB RAM) is good for all my normal computer-related activities.

      Down at the bottom of the spec sheet, they admit that they're recommending "top of the line" processors, and that the spec sheets will be frequently updated to make sure that it continues to recommend modern "top of the line" processors. Why?

      Finally, to add opportunism to insult and injury, they link to a "Dell e-store" which we can assume gives them kickbacks.

      As far as I'm concerned, "minimum system requirements" which do not even come close to reflecting actual minimum system requirements demonstrate (at best) an extreme insensitivity to the already high cost of providing students with an education. At worst, it's a blatant attempt to make money by lying to students and parents about what they need.

      --

      You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

    2. Re:I've seen a lot of overreacting here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm pretty impressed by the media converter cost being $216 (plus a switch to connect it to if you're going to share...) vs the fiber card for $188... other than resale (and installation?) cost the latter would seem to be a better option...

    3. Re:I've seen a lot of overreacting here by ACPosterChild · · Score: 1

      I've already posted about this like 3 times. But, in short:

      The recommendations are so high because they don't want the students and parents complaining in 3-4 years that they have to buy a new computer for their last year of college because their current one can't do what they need it to.

      In '93, when the recommendation was a 66MHz 486/16MB/340MB and 5 years later it was a 200MHz PII/64-128MB/2GB or something, it was a bigger deal than now.

      But, think of 4 years ago, 2000, when some people still in school bought their computers. Do you still run that some configuration for your day-to-day computer uses? CPU, RAM, HD space? I have friends that can tell you exactly what was available, but I'm thinking PIII 500/128-256/5GB or so.

      Of course, it's probably cheaper to buy 2-3 older systems during the course of 4-6 years (assuming you only buy one monitor) than to buy one top-of-the-line system. But good luck explaining that to parents and anybody not very familiar with computers.

      Also, the Dell and Apple links are to get student prices on the machines. If there's any kickback, it's on a price that you can't get unless you're a student [and yes, the price is lower ;) ]

  51. Fiber? heh... by Esion+Modnar · · Score: 1, Funny
    My first thought was, well, it's important for regularity, so by all means, Fiber To The Dorms!

    Sometimes I make initial odd interpretations like that, such as when this guy remarked that some basketball player grew an extra foot in a year. So I said, in all seriousness, "Really? Where'd he grow it?"

    --

    They say the first thing to go is your penis. Well, it's either that or your brain. I forget which...
  52. worth the price? by pedantic+bore · · Score: 2, Informative
    This network is very expensive for the students to use. Their cheapest option for someone with an existing PC is $188.11 (NetGear GA621), which won't work on their home DSL/Broadband/whatever network when they're on break. The option for laptops (a better option for students, IMHO) is to get the adapter gizmo for $216.50 (NetGear GC102). Given that very decent desktops are $600 and laptops $1000, this means that they're increasing the price of these computers by >20%. Ouch.

    To add to the problem, most commodity PCs can't handle gigabit anyway. The garden-variety PCI implementation tops out at about 50 MB/s, so you aren't even getting everything you're paying for unless you pay for a system with PCI-X or better.

    --
    Am I part of the core demographic for Swedish Fish?
    1. Re:worth the price? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah but the smart student will say to a few of his neighbors "Pay me $100 instead of $200 to Netgear/CWRU" and then said student buys a $30 4-port router and the Netgear $200 convertor and pockets the $80 or so profit.

    2. Re:worth the price? by pedantic+bore · · Score: 1
      ... and then the student gets a hefty bill for drilling holes in the wall so his neighbors can run cable to their machines.

      But the real drawback of this solution is that it ties you to one spot. If you want to wander to the library (or live in a different dorm the next year) you'll have to pay the cost again. It probably works out the same as just buying fibre interface. Yuck.

      --
      Am I part of the core demographic for Swedish Fish?
  53. Re:obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I mean, you do wash your hands afterwards, right?

    No.

  54. Labor Costs by Detritus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you look at hardware and labor costs, gigabit Ethernet is cost-effective for new installations. Installing 100base-t is not going to save much money on the hardware and it will be obsolete at an earlier date. Fiber has higher termination costs but it should have a longer useful lifetime than twisted-pair.

    --
    Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
  55. I love it I love it by enoch-clh · · Score: 1

    i live maybe 45 minutes from Case and have been plannin to go there for a few years now... I just cant wait to go there... Biomedical Engineering I HATE HIGH SCHOOL

    1. Re:I love it I love it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless the undergraduate program has changed significantly, it can be tough to find a job with a BS in BME. You end up with a smattering of stuff across a wide variety of fields (biology, mechanical and electrical engineering, etc.) but not really specializing in anything. Mind you, this was a few years ago, but I knew several people who switched majors out of BME when it became clear that the best thing to do with a BS in BME was to go to grad school.

      Like I said, things may have changed since then, but it's something to think about.

    2. Re:I love it I love it by djeaux · · Score: 1

      Of course, an undergrad major in biomedical engineering would be a pretty cool "declared major" for someone ultimately planning to go to med school. The best thing to do with any major is to go to grad school, really.

      --
      "Obviously, I'm not an IBM computer any more than I'm an ashtray" (Bob Dylan)
  56. Re:Large intranet bandwidth attracts RIAA attentio by thedillybar · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If the RIAA had a clue, they would realize that college students are going to have a big say in this country someday. If they plan to exist and operate effectively for the next 100 years, they're going to stop going after the college crowd.

  57. Re:Over-wired? and tooo far ahead of the curve by tdemark · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I don't think they thought this through. From the link:

    If your computer has a 10/100/1000 Ethernet connection, or if it says "Gigabit Ethernet connection included" in the specs, you've got the right system for our network.

    But, further down:

    Our network uses fiber optics connections in your residence hall.

    So, the fact that I have a 10/100/1000 copper connection means that I can't connect to their network?

    Why did they not use copper gigabit for the in room connections, so that (a) EVERY computer from Dell, Apple, etc, labeled "10/100/1000" would be usable without additional hardware, (b) copper gigabit PCI cards are a hell of a lot less expensive than optical fiber cards, and (c) you can still support 10/100Mbit connections for those students (all 99.9% of them) who have no use for gigabit?

    - Tony

  58. Re:Over-wired? and tooo far ahead of the curve by d-rock · · Score: 5, Informative

    Well, I went to Case from 94-98 and worked in the network engineering group in 99. The fiber was put in a long time ago. It wasn't an upgrade, it was just how they wired everything. Every dorm room has two faceplates. Each faceplate has 2 SM fiber pairs, 2 MM fiber pairs, 1 Coax and 1 Cat3 cable for phone. It's unfortunate that they didn't install Cat5, but that's the way it is. Retrofitting with Cat5 was going to be a tremendous cost, so we just avoided doing it.

    Derek

    --
    Don't Panic...
  59. Your tax dollars at waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Old news, but a comment on how/why. It was explained to me (I forget by whom) that the reason CWRU has what seems like overkill is that this was Federally funded. There was a large pot of money, and whatever CWRU did NOT spend, went to the next school in line, so there was no incentive for CWRU NOT to put in a gold-plate network. I don't think I was told where the $$ came from, FCC taxes or what.

    A friend of the family was starting there in fall of 1994 or so, & she asked for computer advice from me, & when I asked about networking, she found out & told me that CWRU would *lend* them a fiber NIC which she would only have to pay for if she did not return it, or maybe she paid a deposit which was refunded when the fiber NIC was returned.

  60. Re:obligatory by aixou · · Score: 0, Redundant

    It is, if you can see 3 hours worth of porn in under 5 minutes. That does leave you another 2h50 minutes of extra time to study.

    Gigabit ethernet != time compressor. Three hours is still three hours. Unless the network hardware they're selling is a flux capacitor, three hours of porn will still take you three hours to watch. And since when is 100Mbit/s not fast enough to stream high quality video anyway?

  61. What are they smoking? by Rufus211 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    From their Computer Recommendations 2004, they say a 2.8ghz CPU is minimum (even though they'll probably say a 2.8ghz Celeron is fine even though it's slower than a ~2.4ghz anything else)? And 64MB of video ram (ignoring the fact that built on cards have no specific ammount of video ram and are fine)? SoundBlaster sound card (even though built on sound is perfectly fine)? Oh, and "Additionally, laptops running windows should use the Centrino processor" (even though Centrino is NOT a CPU, but a marketing name for the Pentium-M CPU with specific wireless)?

    Overal I must say their recomendations are full of shit. (and fiber to the desktop is just stupidly expensive and waiting to break, gig over fiber works great).

    1. Re:What are they smoking? by fireklar · · Score: 1

      They are recommendations, not requirements. They've had the fiber for 15 years.

    2. Re:What are they smoking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You spelled "recommendations" wrong. What've you been smoking? Next time, less questions, more answers.

  62. like 18 years ago at Stanford by peter303 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Fiber ethernet nstalled in 1986.

  63. The research? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ever thought the research may require that RAM, those image matrices have to be stored somewhere! Sometimes its unavoidable.

    (After 'Windows' takes its share, of course)

  64. Fiber wrong choice in this case. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just graduated from Case and just recently spoke with the Cisco Rep that handeled the conversion of Case's network from ATM to Gigabit Ethernet. It would have been cheaper to rerun copper to all ports and buy copper Cisco switches and routers instead of the millions they spent on fiber switches and routers but the person who made the decision to go to fiber so long ago didnt want it to look like he made bad decision. In the long run it will probably work for the best anyway but an interesting fact none the less.

  65. Why run "expensive" fiber? by Moderation+abuser · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Well, because the cable itself is only a small part of the cost. A much larger part of that cost is actually running the cable; lifting up floors, installing cable trays, routing cables etc. It's time consuming and expensive.

    With fiber, you should only ever have to do it *once*. Then you simply upgrade the transmit/receive equipment at either end of the cable. With copper cable, you have to continually replace the wires themselves. CAT3, CAT5, CAT5e, CAT6 how many times do you want to re-run cables all over the place as bandwidth requirements increase?

    The capital cost of fiber is more expensive in the short run but it saves money in the long run.

    --
    Government of the people, by corporate executives, for corporate profits.
  66. Here's a little FYI about CASE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, it's CASE now, not CWRU. That name change came after a $1 million case study to figure out that people would remember CASE easier than CWRU... that's where our tuition goes. =(

    The RIAA did cut into CASE a while back (2-3 years ago I think) and still do random anonymous checks on our network. I think when we got slammed we became the 4th largest distributor of pirated media in the world. Again, our tuition at work.

    Two words... Darth SCSI. Those that go here know about the Gigapr0n.

    Our tuition keeps rising probably because people need more stuff. People are always fascinated with having more stuff... like a diner that took a full year extra to get built, taking out half of our basketball courts in the process.

    Yep, it is home to the Peter B. Lewis building... yeah, the one that looks like I shredded a soda can and placed it on the roof of a building. Huge waste of time, and it was clear that the engineer(s) responsible didn't factor in slabs of ice and snow falling off the roof hitting students as they enter or exit the building.

    BME will shatter your soul. Trust me. When I first came here 3 years ago, I knew 25 people in the BME department (all freshman)... now there are only 2 left of those 25.

  67. YIL by it0 · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one missing yahoo internet live mag?

    Anyone have a good alternative, no wired is different..

  68. but in 1999..... by nuintari · · Score: 1

    but in 1999, they had 155 mbit atm fiber to the desktop, not gigabit.

    they also had the largest, noisiest, flat topology /16 network left.

    --

    --Nuintari

    slashdot : where an opinion can be wrong.

  69. Re:Over-wired? and tooo far ahead of the curve by Moderation+abuser · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "It's unfortunate that they didn't install Cat5"

    Sounds to me like someone had a fair bit of foresight.

    --
    Government of the people, by corporate executives, for corporate profits.
  70. Requirements reads like a local PC company by InsomniaCity · · Score: 1

    These requirements for system spec read like an advertisement for PCs that you see in the local paper, just missing the line with the price.

    If they are just doing word processing/games/filesharing/web browsing, why do they need this? I know Moore's law obsolete's old processors... but some people run operating systems that dont require 50% of the CPU time, and another 25% for all the spyware!

    And the fact that they have their own e-store, where you also have to purchase the NIC makes this sound like someone is getting commission for all those Dells and Apples.

    --
    You cant make anything foolproof, they'll only invent better fools.
  71. Recommend Dell or Apple by failedlogic · · Score: 1

    I don't suppose they're making money recommending these two specific brands are they?

    Case EDU Computer Store>

    Now what exactly do they think students are going to download with this kind of connection other than movies and music? The engineering and science students who might have lots of data prob need their lab computers since it has all the needed software on it. My argument is, the bandwitdh will not help much in doing their assignments.

    1. Re:Recommend Dell or Apple by djeaux · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Now what exactly do they think students are going to download with this kind of connection other than movies and music? The engineering and science students who might have lots of data prob need their lab computers since it has all the needed software on it. My argument is, the bandwitdh will not help much in doing their assignments.
      I agree that at present movies & music are probably going to be the top downloads. At present. But couldn't the availability of that much bandwidth make it actually possible for students to use distributed or client-server applications (or whatever the buzz word du jour happens to be), ultimately reducing the need for those specialized labs? Without the bandwidth, distributed applications are slugs & nobody wants to use them. But this much available bandwidth may make those applications truly feasible.
      --
      "Obviously, I'm not an IBM computer any more than I'm an ashtray" (Bob Dylan)
  72. Re:Over-wired? and tooo far ahead of the curve by Bishop · · Score: 1

    The cost of running fiber is only slightly more then running copper, as most of the cost is labour not materials. The expensive part of fiber is the media converters and switches. I suspect that the university ran fiber because they will be able to upgrade to 10Gigabit for only the cost of new switches. It should save money in the long term.

  73. Re:Over-wired? and tooo far ahead of the curve by Moderation+abuser · · Score: 1

    I suspect they did think it through.

    Perhaps they'd rather not spend money repeatedly re-wiring the LAN as bandwidth requirements increase. After all, it's you who wants to connect to the network, why shouldn't you pay for it.

    --
    Government of the people, by corporate executives, for corporate profits.
  74. I think it's time... by clarkcox3 · · Score: 1

    ...for me to go back to school :)

    --
    There are no tiger attacks in my area and it's all because this rock I'm holding keeps the tigers away.
  75. Wonderful! Now, do they allow movie sharing? by redelm · · Score: 1
    All this bandwidth is just wonderful. I don't think the machines can keep up with gigabit. I can't seem to push more than 300Mbit/s across my PCI busses (short bursts, setup overhead).

    But never mind. The only current use I can see for all this bandwidth is music and movie sharing. I presume CWR had this in mind when they built-out.

    Oh, one small thing: fiber is fragile. The MT or MJ connectors are only good for so many (~50) cycles and are a bitch to replace. RJ45s are good for more and much easier to repunch when worn out.

  76. Re:Large intranet bandwidth attracts RIAA attentio by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

    That arguement didnt help the pot smokers of the 1960s did it?

  77. Cleveland by dpilot · · Score: 1

    Regardless of what you may think of Cleveland, there are several particularly bright spots about the CWRU campus. To name a few:

    * Presti's Donut shop, near the corner of Murray Hill and Mayfield. Go after midnight, when you're done studying, and the donuts for the next day are coming out. Used to be at 1:15AM you get get fresh, HOT cinnamon rolls. (may still be true, don't know)

    * Severance Hall, home of the Cleveland Symphony Orchestra, simply one of the best in the world.

    * the art museum, don't remember the exact name, right next door to Severance Hall.

    and this is all walking distance from the Case campus.

    --
    The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
  78. The True Story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I work and am a student at Case Western, and the gigabit fiber isn't all it's cracked up to be. Mostly because our outgoing connection is capped around 80mb by Oarnet (granted, we do have i2, which rarely gets utilized). I'd just like to point out that we've had speeds described as "worse than dial up" going out while pulling 21 meg/sec on the LAN. Until we actually get a real outgoing connection, the fiber is only good for transfering pictures you've taken in the hallways while waiting for your downloads to finish in prime time.

  79. CWRU is a joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That place is a fucking joke, fiber to the desktop, yeah -- but then they use cheapie $180 transceivers to convert it right back to copper.

    CWRU is a clusterfuck with a lot of money to spend, nothing more

  80. You youngsters ... by emtboy9 · · Score: 1

    back in my day, we had to offer up our first born child, one appendage, and sign contracts in blood just to get a dial up account and access to the campus modem pool. A bank of 1200 and 2400 baud modems!

    And our packets had to travel uphill, both ways, in the snow!

    Hrmmm, this is rather nice tho. Even with the mentioned fragility of fiber (which I know all too well, having destroyed several fiber cables by pinching them in rack doors, raised floor tiles, etc..), it is still a neat idea.

    Wonder if the RIAA and MPAA will insist on sniffers and monitoring on thier network, because we all know that the only thing anyone needs a gigabit connection for is to pirate movies and hack other peoples computers and bank accounts!

    --
    "Our funds have never taken part in toxic or death spiral convertible financings of any sort" -BayStar's managing partne
  81. Why go to Ohio? by sjbe · · Score: 1

    Because the school is in Ohio they needed some new attraction. What other reason is there to go to Ohio for?

    I'll bite. There are plenty of reasons to go to Ohio. I'm from Cleveland so I know the attractions there better but Cincinatti and Columbus are pretty fun cities too. In no particular order and just off the top of my head:

    Rock and Roll Hall of Fame
    Cedar Point (most roller coasters in the world)
    Cleveland Indians/Browns/Cavaliers
    Cincinatti Reds/Bengals
    Columbus Crew/Ohio State Buckeyes
    Toledo Mudhens
    (I know, sports are lost on this crowd)
    Origins International Game Expo
    Cleveland Orchestra (among the best in the world)
    Cleveland Museum of Art
    Cleveland Museum of Natural History
    (fyi, the orchestra and museums are all within walking distance of CWRU's campus)
    Playhouse Square Center (second largest performing arts center in the US)
    Great Lakes Science Center
    Wineries along the south shore of Lake Erie
    Boating/Fishing/Watersports on Lake Erie
    Wright-Patterson Airforce Base
    Birthplace museums for the Wright Bros, Edison and 6 presidents (for history buffs)
    Several excellent colleges, including CWRU
    The Cleveland Clinic (premier heart medicine hospital in the world. Hope you don't have to go for this though...)
    Metroparks (a ring of public parks surrounding many of the major cities, including Cleveland and Toledo)

    And there's plenty more. Cleveland in particular has really turned around in the last 25 years. It can be a pretty fun town to visit these days. If you've done all the stuff I list above and still think Ohio is boring, then we clearly have different definitions of entertainment.

    1. Re:Why go to Ohio? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, you can see all that in a week, and then you're stuck in good old dreary Cleveland with grimy buildings, depressing weather, and nothing to do.

      Except surf the internet.

      See how it all comes together?

    2. Re:Why go to Ohio? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so? how is that different than most cities?

    3. Re:Why go to Ohio? by MicroBerto · · Score: 1
      Thank you for defending my beloved Buckeye State, but how dare you put The Ohio State Buckeyes on the same line as the Columbus crew???

      The Scarlet and Gray deserves 20 lines on its own with all of the activities going on down there. The football program alone is a bigger draw than most of these other things combined (the stadium consistently fills 105,000+ fans -- not many beat that).

      Not only that, but Columbus, OH (and probalby Cleveland as well) is a business and logistics mecca of the nation. Here's why:

      Location: Within 500 miles of Greater Columbus:

      58% of U.S. population & 50% of Canadian population

      61% of U.S. Manufacturing Capacity

      80% of U.S. Corporate Headquarters

      Logistics Assets

      2 International Airports

      3 Intermodal rail yards

      40 Freight forwarders and customs brokers

      140 Trucking Companies - 40 National Carriers

      Over 150 million square feet of warehouse space

      Foreign Trade Zone #138 and 24-hour customs

      Not to mention the incredible Logistics program at OSU

      So don't be surprised when you and your business come to this rapidly-growing city for business.

      Beyond the Wineries mentioned above, downtown Cleveland, Columbus, and Cincinatti areas all have party scenes that knock the socks off of most cities that are comparably-sized. We Ohioans know how to have fun. I dare any of you to come visit Ohio State , Ohio University, Bowling Green, Toledo, or Dayton (and maybe Miami of Ohio, although that's more questionable) and try to keep up.

      Yes, geologically, Ohio is flat and boring. But if you are near a city here and aren't having fun, then that's your fault, because citizens here are hard-working, friendly people. It's all about the agricultural values that are so fine-grained into Central Ohio, as well as the tough working-class values that are in Northeast Ohio.

      --
      Berto
    4. Re:Why go to Ohio? by JimBobJoe · · Score: 1

      Yes, geologically, Ohio is flat and boring.

      Interestingly, I was just in the San Francisco/bay area...and yes, the mountains are very pretty.

      But I missed the clouds so desperately. Clouds are like mountains of the sky, and better than mountains, they are dynamic and if you just wait 15 minutes, new clouds will take their place, and their shapes are fascinating and compelling.

      California had no clouds, and I became bored of the static mountainscape.

      Therefore the clouds of my beloved Ohio kick the ass of the mountains of California.

  82. Re:Over-wired? and tooo far ahead of the curve by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 1

    They should have highhlighted that you need to buy the NetGear media converter. We should all be amazed that fiber equipment is available for a little over $200 but that looms large in a student's budget.

  83. What a nightmare by The+Ape+With+No+Name · · Score: 1

    Why use fiber? They should have used gig copper. I can think of a thousand reasons not to do this, but kinking the connector cable is Numero Uno. There must be a very happy cable vendor nearby.

    --
    Comparing it to Windows will be a moot point, since El Dorado is going to have a 40% larger code base than XP.
  84. Re:Over-wired? and tooo far ahead of the curve by ThogScully · · Score: 1

    They could have wired Cat5 instead of Cat3 and used the extra pairs for the phone just as easily.
    -N

    --
    I've nothing to say here...
  85. The only problem is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They've capped our connection to the outside world at 45 mbps for the whole damn campus, so transfers outside of our local network are slower than that from most cable providers.

  86. Adblock by KlausBreuer · · Score: 1

    Curses. I'm using Mozilla and Adblock to get rid of all these ridiculous aimed-at-the-bottom-percentile advertisements and pop-ups, and now the ads start infiltrating the news websites!

    Chaps, before publishing something *this* obviously written by an PR department, perhaps you'd at least consider rewriting it.
    I mean, the whole thing looks like you copied it straight off a billboard.

    (Yes, here in Germany universities don't advertise themselves. That's because they're free).

    --
    Free PC version of ChipWits at http://www.breueronline.de/klaus/chipwits/
  87. Fiber is better then copper by Diabolical · · Score: 1

    Fiber beats copper on a couple of points.

    For instance, the length of the cable can be much longer (kilometers instead of meters) and it's far more reliable when it comes to actual speeds. Copper does have the disadvantage of signal distortion which is far less a problem with fiber.

    The possible uses for such cabling could be far more then just downloading. Webcasts of lectures come to mind and for the students it would be much more fun to be able to collaborate on projects using the network. I doubt that they just used fiber with internet usage in mind.

    Several posts allready mentioned the fact that fiber is being used for over a decade now. Why go and dig to put ethernet in the ground when you allready have fiber laying there?

  88. Highschool Network by Enigma_Man · · Score: 1

    My Highschool had an amazingly good computer / network setup.

    We had two giant switch racks on either end of the building connected to eachother via fiber. There were at least 4 100Mb wall sockets in each room, and most had 10+. We had three computer labs (two were macintosh labs with a wide variety of different macs available) and the CAD-lab was PC. Every student had server space from the beefy (I don't remember the exact specs though) Mac server in the main lab room.

    The biggest problem was the connection to the outside world. It was a donated ISDN line from the local phone company, and didn't get very good speeds.

    BTW, this was all in a school of 300 people total spanning grades 7-12.
    br -Jesse

    --
    Nothing says "unprofessional job" like wrinkles in your duct tape.
    1. Re:Highschool Network by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Honestly, thats about average. Doesn't sound too special

  89. The line outside sucks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One thing the article doesn't mention is that, while the LAN is fast as hell, the line outside sucks. Split between Case, and the Cleveland art and music universities is a 45mbit line. That's right. It used to not be so bad when we used 10x this much and they didn't notice, but the ISP cracked down on bandwidth abuse this past semester and at times the line outside was slower than a 56k!

  90. Re:Over-wired? and tooo far ahead of the curve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why not just run the fiber b/w buildings and then put copper gigabit switches in the buildings so students can use commodity gigabit ethernet adapters?

    That's the way it is at my school. Every dorm room, office, lab, and library has 1000/100/10 base T at every port, and the buildings are all connected to the university's Internet-2 gateway via fiber.

    This is the way it's been for the past 4 years, and my school is just the state university of a small deep-southern state. I bought a $15 ethernet card and get gigabit access to internet2...no complaints from me.

  91. Re:Over-wired? and tooo far ahead of the curve by Trygve · · Score: 1

    No, actually the fiber infrastructure went in before CAT-3 was even a standard. New buildings and those getting rewired for other reasons are getting fiber AND CAT-6, but they just couldn't justify the cost of replacing the existing infrastructure. It's served us well for 15 years.

    Oh, and in buildings new enough to have a copper network infrastructure as well, the ethernet ports are connected to 10/100/1000 switches, so you can plug in whatever type of RJ-45 ethernet you like.

    I don't know why this is news, though. We made /. when we went all gig, and we made /. when we announced free wireless through our 1600 acceess points on campus. But there's nothing new to report now.

  92. Re:obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I mean, you do wash your hands afterwarts, right?
    You left a little freudian slip in there...

  93. Re:Over-wired? and tooo far ahead of the curve by korc · · Score: 1

    When I left the dorms in 90 to move up the hill to the Heights, they put the fiber in over the summer....rat bastards.

    --

    korc

  94. Laptops - PCMCIA GB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What about laptops? It was my understanding that PCMCIA cards for GB connections were unavailable. Many new students show up with laptops for the portability.

  95. Argh. Explanation by sinnergy · · Score: 5, Informative

    OK, let me try to explain how this campus works to those who assume that Case just dumped tens or hundreds of millions of dollars on a fiber network in recent years.

    The real answer is, we've had this fiber network in place since the late 1980s. That's right. So to those who are talking about "why not just run cat6?". Well, let me tell you, that wasn't exactly even around back then. Here's a brief (and somewhat dated) timeline of how this campus network was built: http://cnswww.cns.cwru.edu/tour/Tours/CWRUnet_Tour s/CWRUnet_Timeline.html

    I know this because I was a student here and now a technical and facilities manager and have been on the campus for about a decade.

    Also, gig fiber to the desktop *is* nice. Try pulling down a complete set of ISOs (MSDNAA, BSD, Linux, whatever). The more the better, in my opinion. The equipment really isn't that expensive.

    Yes, one of our limiting factors is that currently we are uplinked at an oc-3 with only about 45 megabits partitioned off for commodity internet usage. The rest is devoted to Internet2 traffic. However, as I understand it, this will change and in the near future we will have a full gigabit uplink to our provider (maybe even more, it's been awhile).

    In regards to the recommendations made, no, I don't think they were really necessary. Who outside of this school really cares anyway? However, that said, the University does get a really nice discount on some Dell products. Enough to make it worth it for most students (whom would probably buy Dell anyway based upon current market share).

    So there you have it. Quit bitching about the use of fiber. I know this won't stop the arguing, but might as well not fight a decision that was made 15 YEARS AGO. Oh, and by the way, kind of nice to know that that same infrastructure has WORKED for that entire 15 years without need to repull copper and likely will continue to work for many more decades to come. A low long-term TCO is kind of a nice thing you know.

    Finally, my opinions do not necessarily reflect the official opinions of my employe, Case Western Reserve University and I speak in no official public relations capacity... I simply speak as an alumnus and current employee.

  96. Re:Over-wired? and tooo far ahead of the curve by mindriot · · Score: 1

    I didn't RTFA (hey, this is slashdot :-)), but maybe constructing that network has been largely funded by corporations who are now going to make a big buck selling the necessary equipment to students?

  97. Re:Over-wired? and tooo far ahead of the curve by jpmkm · · Score: 1

    I don't want 90VAC pulses right next to my data.

  98. Case Women R Ugly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Case needs that kind of bandwidth for porn. There's no real eye candy whatsoever

  99. Re:Large intranet bandwidth attracts RIAA attentio by Nf1nk · · Score: 1
    That arguement didnt help the pot smokers of the 1960s did it?

    Depends what state. In the PRC (peoples republic of California) I have cop freind who won't do the paper work on anything less than an ounce, because most DA's won't do anything with it. Now that the medical pot law is in effect, its easier for cops just to turn a blind eye to the whole mess.

    --
    I used to have a cool sig, back when I cared
  100. Re:Large intranet bandwidth attracts RIAA attentio by thedillybar · · Score: 1

    I made a statement, not an argument. If that's how they want to go about business, fine with me.

  101. Re:Over-wired? and tooo far ahead of the curve by dhovis · · Score: 4, Informative

    Q: Why did they use fiber instead of coper cables?

    A: Because they are using the fiber optic cables they installed into the dorm rooms in the early ninties. I'm not sure of the exact year, but I believe that the wiring was completed in 1992 or 1993. I started at Case in 1994 and every dorm room had a faceplate with phone, cable, and multimode and singlemode fiber optic. The multimode fiber was used for the network connection. Even back then, my brand spanking new PowerMac 7100/66, which had a built-in AAUI Ethernet port, required an AAUI to AUI adapter and then an AUI to 10-baseFL converter to hook to the wall.

    The reason Case can go to gigabit in the first place is that they don't have to replace the Cat 3 cable that they probably would have installed back then. Unfortunately, the bet did not pay of in the sense that copper is still the standard, and fiber optic NICs are very expensive. It did pay off in the sense that they can switch to Gigabit for the cost of expensive NICs, rather than the cost of having to lay new cable.

    Oh, and that whole "Most Wired Campus" thing from Yahoo Internet Life was a bunch of bunk. The head network guy fabricated most of what was reported in that article. He finally got fired, and it seems the network is in much better hands now. Back in 1996, Case began an ill-fated switch from Ethernet to ATM, which seemed like a good idea at the time, but the ATM network never worked well, and ATM has never, and probably will never, catch on as a technology to the desktop. Old users never got ATM, they remained on the old, reliable, 10-Megabit network. They finally scrapped that system a few years ago and announced that they were going to convert the entire network over to switched gigabit, which should be pretty damn cool, and is an established technology.

    --

    --
    The internet is the greatest source of biased information in the history of mankind.

  102. Video on demand by Zemrec · · Score: 1

    Like a lot of you I've been wondering what they could possibly be doing with all that bandwidth.

    Then I thought, hey, they could have streaming live video lectures and video-conferencing. No need to leave your room!

    Or even video-on-demand recorded lectures. No need to wake up at 7 AM to make that 8 AM lecture on the other side of campus! Just TiVO it! :-)

    Think of the possibilities!

    Anyone know what they're really using it for? Or is just a stupid bullet point on the recruitment brochure?

    Internet access != better education. Only if you use the bandwidth for educational purposes such as the above will it enhance education.

  103. Re:Argh. Explanation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This may be true, but you weren't on campus when you woke up one morning and couldn't get to your webmail account because it took so long. :p I can't argue too much, though. I remember the ATM crapping out all the time a few years ago. I don't know if that was the outside line crapping or whatever, but its nice to see the reliability improve with the speed boost

  104. Re:obligatory by Patrik_AKA_RedX · · Score: 1

    I will never misspell afterwards on slashdot again.
    I will never misspell afterwards on slashdot again.
    I will never misspell afterwards on slashdot again.
    I will never misspell afterwards on slashdot again.
    ...

    I know I'm supposed to do this a 100 times, but it would be a little lenghty to post.

  105. Over-wired by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    First thing: as many other alums have said -- the fibre's been there. That's not new.

    Secondly, of course its "over-wired"... who needs more than 256 kB of main memory anyway?

  106. just have a real gigabit ethernet fibre card ready by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    who needs crazy shit from the people-fore-down-shit-your-neck-department, when you can simply use your own SX gigabit ethernet card instead of that converter.

    doh!

    just check the specs of that netgear crap and bring a decent fibre card along, instead of buying crap shit

    Netgear GC102
    http://www.netgear.com/products/details/GC102.php? view=

    do people always believe crap that other people tell them? why not reading the faqs and specs and using your own mind _before_ doing the first step.

    get this world educated. brighten up at last

  107. Other uses. by Kozar_The_Malignant · · Score: 1

    >Plus, downloading to your HD isn't the only thing you can do with a network. You can stream live lectures to people's rooms, use a network application server to allow students to access large server programs, VNC from the helpdesk with no choppiness, etc.

    And those are only the legitimate uses. These are college dorms, here. I can think of any number of non-academic uses for that much bandwidth. Gaming, live video... With thousands of bright and sometimes bored minds at work, I'm sure that they'll come up with any number of things to piss off the administration.
    --
    Some mornings it's hardly worth chewing through the restraints to get out of bed.
  108. Gigabit bandwidth to every dorm room, all sharing by voxel · · Score: 0, Troll

    Gigabit bandwidth to every dorm room, all sharing a single 56k modem connected at 28.8k (bad line quality).

    Hey, at least they can send porn and mp3 files around quickly to eachother!

    --
    Modesty is one of life's greatest attributes
  109. ethernet flaws by Creepy · · Score: 1

    This would heavily depend on how the network is wired. Ethernet LANs have problems under heavy load, so if sections of the network are becoming saturated, a broader pipe is necessary. This is because ethernet uses sensing and collisions rather than tokens which work exactly the opposite (bad under light load, good under heavy).

    Strangely, though, this doesn't seem to be the case. The Netgear converter typically is connected to a switch, so collisions would be unlikely. Since each user is required to buy one, shared bandwidth isn't the problem. If this were up to me, I'd buy one switch per dorm and buy a much cheaper hub to split to machines and other devices. Unless students are running 3 or 4 (or more, depending on compression) HD-TV quality video streams, they're not going to come close to saturating the bandwidth.

  110. Why can't BU do this? by MacBorg · · Score: 1

    Grrr... I'm going to BU in the fall and would love for something like this to be in my dorm room. Unfortunately I'll have to make do with 10/100. I guess I'll live. But wait, then the 10/100/1000 port on my Mac goes unused. Oh, the humanity.

  111. Waste of Money by $criptah · · Score: 1

    Wow! What a waste of money! I cannot believe that somebody is actually falling for it. I would rather see cheaper tuition than a completely useless fiber. Let's face it: for what most of the students do, T10 is fast enough.

    I suspect many of /. readers will write up an angry message to me and mod this post down. But I do not really care about my rate karma on /. as much as I care about colleges wasting money on things like plasma TVs and very fast internet. Why? Well, because based on my experience, those things do not add anything to education.

    When I was getting my degree in computer science, I spent a good fraction of my time in front of the computer. I do not remember a single comp. sci. assignment that required a fiber internet connection or a terabyte of space. In fact, most of my performance problems were related to the couple of slow hard drives sitting in my box. When I copied large files, my hard drives could not keep up; the network was just fine.

    Why am I ranting here? There is a simple reason for that. I paid for my education out of my own pocket and throught loans under my name. When you spend your own money, you tend to count everything and it bothers me that some colleges choose to show off with the latest -- and sometimes useless -- technology, expensive concerts and other crap that does not really matter, while there are students who do not have enough financial aid. My beloved schools decided that it was absolutely necessary to have plasma TVs in dining halls and beefedup PowerMacs in the dean's office (like if the dude was going to use the DVD burners on a daily basis). What is up with that?

    As a student, I would not mind having nice(er) computer labs, more computer access points on campus and more financial aid.

    Ciao.

    1. Re:Waste of Money by Zed2K · · Score: 1

      You may have "learned" in college but you sure didn't learn anything. College is a lot more than just getting a degree. It is about the experience as much as its about getting that piece of paper that says you passed.

    2. Re:Waste of Money by $criptah · · Score: 1

      And... how is your post related to what I said? I am sorry, but I am not following it. I did not state what I have and have not learned in college, nor I emphasized why degree was or was not important for me.

      I mentioned what I thought about fiber on campus and that was it.

    3. Re:Waste of Money by Zed2K · · Score: 1

      Actually the bulk of your post was about colleges wasting money on technology that YOU didn't feel was necessary.

  112. They can run 10Gig over the fiber by Moderation+abuser · · Score: 1

    Right now if they want to spend a few grand on the NICs. You can pick up a gigabit fiber NIC for $170 so while it is more expensive than copper it's not a significant cost.

    As I understand it, they fibered the place in 88, CAT5 didn't exist until 93.

    Just think, gigabit to the desktop or 10gig to the desktop and gigabytes of dirt cheap RAM. Hard disks would become mythical beasts.

    --
    Government of the people, by corporate executives, for corporate profits.
    1. Re:They can run 10Gig over the fiber by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > You can pick up a gigabit fiber NIC for $170 so while it is more expensive than copper it's not a significant cost.

      Just how long has it been since you've been a student, or do you think all students (and parents) are rich?

    2. Re:They can run 10Gig over the fiber by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have regulary picked up fiber nics on ebay
      for $20-60 . Intel nics even. Media converter is
      a waste.

    3. Re:They can run 10Gig over the fiber by Sdrawcab · · Score: 1

      Just sell blood plasma for a month. 8 visits, $200+ (At least in Wisconsin).

  113. Re:Over-wired? and tooo far ahead of the curve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Uh, yeah, that's a viable business plan...

    Slash and Dot, "Still smokin'"

  114. Any internal traffic limits? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Also what are the regulations on sharing?

    Without sharing and huge local traffic caps (dozens of GB a week, preferably 100s) this is overkill.

    There are some other niche applications, but nothing major. Multicasting some video on the network is nice ... but you only need the fast backbones for that, not Gb/s to the rooms. Backing up your HD across the net is nice, but again really niche ... and requiring huge traffic caps.

  115. Re:Over-wired? and tooo far ahead of the curve by denttford · · Score: 2, Informative

    So, the fact that I have a 10/100/1000 copper connection means that I can't connect to their network?

    I went to Case from 1997-99. At least back then, you are right.

    Case was using 155Mb ATM over fiber into each dorm room. I think I still have my PCI ATM adapter somewhere (don't tell anyone, they cost a fortune back then). I believe they boasted the largest ATM installation outside of General Motors. (The fiber has been in place for well over 10 years - I think they chose to install it in 1988.)

    Anyway, not everyone could use the fiber directly, (were there ISA ATM cards?) and while I don't recall the details from the time, there was some sort of dongle+packet translation into Ethernet, which played havoc with the overall network traffic regarless of what kind of machine you brought to the party.

    I do remember hearing things had changed a bit (I transfered out to NYU) - and here is a good article that seems to discuss a good bit of Case's IT history.

    As an aside, CWRU students do put this to work - Hell, I knew someone who got a RIAA letter in 1997 for ftp serving. Even back then, files on the local SMB network would put many P2P systems to shame. To be fair though, there were many who put it to good and innovative use. And if you ever have to deal with ATM and Linux, CWRULUG (though out of date) would be a good place to start.

    At Case, its probably only 50% that have no use for Gig Ethernet - and the other half is very happy to take their share of the bandwidth.

    --

    Leben Sie jetzt die Fragen.
  116. How does this help educate the students by the+Luddite · · Score: 1

    in regards to a tradtitional education anyway. I would rather pay for better professors who are inspiring and capable and for better classrooms and labs than Internet access. How many more distractions do the students need?

    1. Re:How does this help educate the students by kundor · · Score: 1

      You live up to your name.

  117. things are changing fast by fpedraza · · Score: 1

    Back in the mid 90's when I was in university, you were just suposed to:

    a) get drunk one or twice per week
    b) date girls
    a) study

    How are they hoping to do a, b and c with fiber in the dorm?

    1. Re:things are changing fast by m1chael · · Score: 0

      You can't drink over the interent but you can date and study girls there.

      --
      I know you are psychotic, but please make an effort.
  118. Pearl Harbor and CASE by kyoko21 · · Score: 3, Informative

    I am not sure why ATM sucked so bad at CASE but the ATM network deployed at Pearl Harbor works great (155Mbit to the desktop even with 300MHz P2). Tons and tons and tons of fiber all around the base and everything runs great. They even provide a few of the popular cable news network feeds over this ATM network such as FOX, CNN, Bloomber, and I think a few others that I can't recall. The only copper drop that was around was for the analog phones. In fact, even a year ago you would probablly still have a hard time trying to find a cat-5 drop. Keeps people from 'hooking' un-authorized equipment (personal systems) into the network so less chance for an outside contamination. Too bad now they are moving over to ethernet and no more on-demand video. *sigh*

    1. Re:Pearl Harbor and CASE by glacial23 · · Score: 2, Informative

      At the time, Case's network was a flat topology (i.e. no routing at all) - this made for some difficult times with thousands of machines. Another issue was that the various edge devices that Fore/Marconi tried to get us to use for ATM-Ethernet bridging couldn't really cope with the flat topology either - there was one particular device that would crash every night at about the same time- I managed to figure out that it was HP JetDirect auto-discovery that was attempting to ARP the entire campus's address range...

  119. Not new by kundor · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What the hell? Case has had fiber to the dorm room for about 15 years now.

  120. East of Cleveland by Venner · · Score: 1

    Haha. Northeast Ohio weather gets a little old after a while, for sure. As a lifelong Geauga county resident (snowbelt), I can't remember how many times I've heard Dick Goddard say, "We can expect a trace to 3 inches of snow here in Cleveland, 4 inches to 2 feet in the snowbelt"

    Avegrage yearly snowfall is around 110" (2.8m), and we picked up 226" (5.4m) locally in 1996.
    For those of you reading this from Europe thinking, "Ha, we get three times as much here in the Alps!", realize that
    a) NE Ohio isn't mountainous and
    b) we're only located about 40 degrees north latitude.

    Lake-effect snow makes life very interesting. Ask anyone from here, along I-90, and up through eastern New York state. :-)

    I spent the last winter in Raleigh, North Carolina, and loved watching the whole city shut down when they got a couple of inches. I could live with another winter like that...

    --
    A preposition is a terrible thing to end a sentence with.
    1. Re:East of Cleveland by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a switch on the dash of your Ford Explorer, it reads:

      FOUR WHEEL DRIVE

      Press it when there's a lot of snow. :)

  121. Money Not Well Spent by abonventre · · Score: 5, Interesting

    As a former student who transfered out last year, I can tell you that the gigabit ethernet and wireless everywhere thing was nice and all, but the money could have been spent elsewhere. Maybe to aid their struggling liberal arts department. Or maybe even to be put into Athletics. I remember our equipment and uniforms were in such bad shape that the equip. manager told us not to wear our jackets around campus because they were already so run down. When youre supposedly in the same league as Emory, NYU and UChicago, you cant pull such penny pinching. It was embarassing going to track meets against them. Bottom line is that theyre obviously not putting the money into anything that truly makes the campus attractive for prospective students. Check out the over 70% acceptance rate. Thats ridiculous for a top 50 school. Case can have their gratuitous gigabit. I'll take a better college experience over that any day.

    1. Re:Money Not Well Spent by ExoticMandibles · · Score: 1
      That's the first time I've heard someone say "they shouldn't spend that money on network access! They should put it into athletics!"

      And on /. no less!

    2. Re:Money Not Well Spent by abonventre · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well I would hope that most people try to find a balance between geekdom and physical activity. I'm a comp sci major and I'm on my schools cross country and track teams. Why am I in the minority? I would think that with the amount of supposed intelligence boasted by most posters, that they would realize that being of sound mind AND BODY is a good philosophy.

  122. Re:Argh. Explanation by InfiniteWisdom · · Score: 1

    Also, gig fiber to the desktop *is* nice. Try pulling down a complete set of ISOs (MSDNAA, BSD, Linux, whatever). The more the better, in my opinion. The equipment really isn't that expensive.


    $200+ is not expensive? Especially given that you can buy complete desktop computers for $600 now?

  123. How many retailers included gigabit fiber? by Chris+Pimlott · · Score: 1

    There's a good reason to recommend Dell. CWRU made arrangements with Dell to have offer a system with gigabit fiber already installed, at a decent cost. I don't think you'll find many computer retailers out there that even sell gigabit fiber cards, let alone preinstall them for you. For many students who don't regularly tinker with their innards of their PC, it's appreciated.

  124. Re:obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    *lengthy

  125. Re:Argh. Explanation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You've also got to keep in mind the $500 or so that students are charged as a "technology fee" to offset the cost of this network. It is by no means free, or included in the tuition.

  126. No internal limits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like many schools, Case has a local DirectConnect hub that restricts to local network users only. You can usually get a good 10-12MB/s transfer rate over it.

    The Case network staff is pretty laisez-faire when it comes to the network. If you start hogging too much bandwidth on a regular basis, they will give you a call and potentially throttle your port. I only have this happen once, when I left a bittorrent on overnight that was running at 0.5MB/s upload for about 12 hours straight. They gave me a call, said knock it off, and throttled my speeds for a day or so. After that, it was fine.

  127. Nice, but expensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    As a student at Case Western Reserve University I can say that the fiber provides nice bandwidth but is a hassle in many other respects. If you have a gigibit copper port on your machine you can get away with the GC102, however if you have 10/100 equipment you are forced to buy a $500 Allied Telesyn 12 Port switch with gigabit uplink. If you were an upper classman and were around when they changed over from the ATM system they provide you with the necessary equipment. The whole system is overkill; fiber is everywhere, even in the library. Which is great if you want to lug a fiber to Ethernet converter or 12 port switch and all the associated cables with you. The ITS department is working to improve this, wireless is available virtually anywhere on campus, however to use any restricted resources you have to use a VPN client (In order to download this client you have to connect your computer to a faceplate, so you cant just be totally wireless). There are new dorms going up as we /. And they are being wired with gigabit copper, so I guess they have seen the folly of their ways. We only get gigabit speeds across campus, our outbound internet connection was 100Mbps for most of the year, but our ISP got tired of giving us bandwidth for free and cut us back to the 44mbps we pay for. When this happened you could actually hear the nerds start crying because this bandwidth is shared between all the dorms, academic, administrative and research buildings. Bottom line: Its may be glamorous but it is an expensive investment to fuel the on-campus porn ring.

    1. Re:Nice, but expensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you don't have to be wired at one point. Just get the VPN client from a friend who is.

  128. This is just weird by ianbnet · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Does anyone else find it strange that /.ers are bitching about a school that has fiber to every room?

    Where are the questions about network topology, TCO over the past 15 years, types of network hardware and plans for future upgrades? Seriously, that's what interests us, not a discussion that amounts to bashing what is really a pretty decent school on their decision to overwire?

    I would have killed for an overwired college. I went to Oberlin, about 20 miles from Case, and, in the words of a previous post, would have given my left nut for a decent on-campus network, much less a 45mb (potentially 1000mb!!) internet connection.

    But in the spirit of the bitching I've seen -- the Yahoo! rankings mean/meant nothing. As was mentioned before, they were based solely on a survey sent out to IT administrators at the schools.

    --
    --------------------- -me, Crusher of those who are Foolish (don't be foolish)
    1. Re:This is just weird by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does anyone else find it strange that /.ers are bitching about a school that has fiber to every room?

      I don't find this strange at all. If /.ers didn't have (or find) something to bitch about on a daily basis, the human race - as we know it - wouldn't continue to evolve.

  129. Re:obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yes because you usualy watch the whole 3 hours of a porn right?

    if it's so, you are everygirl dream!

  130. Re:Large intranet bandwidth attracts RIAA attentio by driverEight · · Score: 1
    If the RIAA had a clue, they would realize that college students are going to have a big say in this country someday

    PEDANTIC

    College students will never have a meaningfull say in this country until they can be bothered to vote or show a willingness to donate / organize for political groups (however, as you no doubt meant, today's college students may well have a big say in this country in the future).

    Think the war in Iraq is wrong? Think pot shouldn't be a schedule A drug? Nobody cares unless your voting block can make a difference in an election.

    /PEDANTIC

    --

    It's not the size of your .sig that matters, it's how you use it.

  131. The only meaningful use I can imagine for such a network is to build a kind of Grid/Cluster out of all the students computers for carrying out HEAVY computational tasks.....

    --
    Du kan glomma dina ensama stunder, du kan lita paa teknikens under - Wilmer X
  132. Re:Over-wired? and tooo far ahead of the curve by simcop2387 · · Score: 1

    actually i thought it was 48v DC so that it didn't interfear with the transmissions of the phone?

    if you use a 56k modem thats exactly whats going on

  133. Don't count on the bookstore for any good ideas... by ignoringReality · · Score: 1

    ...this is also the same bookstore that around 1996 offered to price match on every book in the store. Students walked in with web page printouts showing books at 10% of list and got some pretty big refunds. I also started CWRU in 1994, and whether it was ahead of the curve or not campus-wide doom and descent games were probably the fastest you could find at the time.

  134. Prestige by arfuni · · Score: 1

    This reeks of prestige spending. Some fat cat university head decided to outdo a competitor school or wanted his school to be at the top of a list. Students have no say in how our money is spent - I cringe every time I see my school (memphis.edu) throwing up a new water fountain in front of an administration building or a pointless clock tower a few feet taller than every other school in the area. This high speed connection may be great for a handful of geeks, but will be totally useless to 95% of students. The wireless internet is great, but come on. What the hell is a Chemistry, History or Business major supposed to do with a connection like this?

    1. Re:Prestige by thedeacon · · Score: 0

      I agree. It does sound like prestige spending...if this was a school other than Case (I am from Cleveland), I would think so except from one fact...

      Case has lots of geeks (very extensive engineering offerings, especially biomedical). More than just about anywhere else in Ohio (save--maybe--Ohio State).

      Case has always been at the forefront of whole-campus connectivity (Cleveland FreeNet is an example) so it's not that surprising that they did it. They are just trying to keep up with themselves...which is a lot more acceptable than trying to keep up with the joneses like it seems that U of Memphis (or my school, csuohio.edu) tries to do.

      -deac

      --
      the deacon...that's all you need to know for now
  135. Re:Over-wired? and tooo far ahead of the curve by tim_mathews · · Score: 1

    -48VDC for the on-hook line. It drops to 6-9VDC when you pick up the reciever and the ring pulses are in the range of 80-100VAC. That way they can be filtered out with a couple of capacitors and talking won't make the bell ring. Of course their phones are probably digital so I don't think any of that applies.

  136. Fiber to rooms isn't really new by tomzyk · · Score: 1

    It sounds like they ran fiber to all the dorm rooms just so they could say, "Hey! Look! We have fiber run to all the dorm rooms!"

    Actually, they've had fiber running to all of the dorm rooms for close to 10 years now. I had a fiber connection my freshman year (1994).

    The biggest problem that I realized was when I graduated and LEFT the campus and realized how crappy the rest of the world has it for an internet connection. (just a 56k modem for a couple years until they finally offered DSL in my neighborhood.) Hell, we used to download MP3s [and this is before they became popular; we always had to rip our own] and video porn in a matter of seconds. Now it takes minutes or hours!

    --
    Karma: NaN
  137. A floppy drive is recommended? by Skapare · · Score: 1

    A floppy drive is recommended for CWRU students? Aren't those obsolete? I haven't used floppies since last century.

    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  138. what good is it? by yipyow · · Score: 1

    if most universities police file sharing, block lots of ports, etc. what can you do with it, besides maybe download linux iso's? you can't run a server on most university networks without permission...i agree with previous posters that all that bandwidth will simply be wasted.

    1. Re:what good is it? by rafimg · · Score: 1

      That's news to me. At Tufts, the Network Use Policy allows us to run servers and simply recommends working with TCCS to help things run smoothly (except mail servers -- we need permission for that). Ports are not blocked at all here, and the "policing" of file sharing is limited to responding to specific requests by copyright holders who trace files to our network.

      To respond to your broader point, bandwidth isn't only beneficial for file sharing (nor is file sharing only beneficial for copyright infringement and Linux ISO's). Broadcast-quality video conferencing comes to mind, and people in different fields, particularly in academia, can undoubtedly think of many situations where the bandwidth is genuinely useful.

  139. Wireless in the Dorms? by billstewart · · Score: 1

    Their blurbs say they've got lots of wireless around, but wireless is pretty short-range stuff - I'd guess that it's in the academic buildings and eating areas, but that doesn't mean that they've also installed much wireless coverage in the already-wired dorms.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    1. Re:Wireless in the Dorms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Student of Case here, and actually I'm sitting in my dorm room right now on a wireless connection. All dorms and school run fraternitiy/sorority houses have wireless access as of last year.

  140. Re:Over-wired? and tooo far ahead of the curve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Yes, now that Ray Neff (the VP of information services, who had zero clue about what running a reliable network was all about) is gone, the system works great!

    The network is fast and we don't have the regular network outages all over campus that were the mark of his reign.

  141. my DSL still works better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Especially last semester, the network was slowing to a near halt almost daily.. There are constantly problems with OARnet, and I rarely get download speeds that I would call fast. It's way over hyped..

    It used to be that freshman with laptops had to buy a $200 converter box, well last year they got to trade those in for neat little switches.. damn i'm jealous.

  142. Should have majored in Physics by Myrmidon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I went to CWRU for Physics, Class of 1993. It was great -- IMHO the physics classes were uniformly good, with but a single exception. (Hey, one can't win them all.)

    Since then things may have gotten even better. As I was walking out the door at graduation time I got to shake the hand of Lawrence Krauss, who had just arrived to become Chairman of the department. He seemed pretty cool. I also know that the department got some spiffy new labs and equipment over the next few years. (Not that I didn't get plenty of good education using the old stuff...)

    It is a big mistake to generalize about any school based on the activities of a few departments, let alone a single professor. Universities are huge, and decentralized; each little corner stands on its own. For example, in my day, the physics department was great, but CWRU's math department had a terrible reputation among the undergrads. (Everyone said there were a few math professors who could teach, but that they had trouble getting tenure. I ended up learning all my math from the physicists. :) Also, the EE undergrads I knew were none too happy, and I also heard stories about Comp Sci's troubles. But none of this affected the happiness of the physicists, chemists, and biologists that I knew.

    At any school larger than a couple of hundred people, you have to shop department by department (and, for grad school, adviser by adviser). Believe me, there are horrifying experiences to be had at Harvard, Cornell, and MIT as well.....

  143. HaHAHAHA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well if the education part were true the internet part might be nice. But here's a bit of a wake up for anyone pondering this snipette of reality. The latest president of CWRU has cut EVERYTHING out of the budget. There is not really any such thing there anymore as a school sponsored activity. The reasoning? Well I'm glad you asked. You see, anytime this new president considers cutting something and adding the funds elsewhere, he asks,"How do we compare to MIT?"
    Yes... CWRU is attempting to become MIT. The amazing thing is that the idiot in charge actually says this stuff out loud to the student body. It is a huge joke to everyone at the school, apparently everyone except the administration.

    On a side note, lovely that they are charging an arm and a leg to connect to the internet when I'm sure most students would be just as happy with a free RJ45 connection. Also fiber to ethernet kits only cost about $100, and the school is charging over $200... wow. screw you anyway they can.

    FOr the record, the graduate studies at CWRU are good, but don't bother going there for undergrad.

  144. Fiber to the Dorm Room by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oat bran muffins with a side of coffee will do the trick.

  145. Wilform Brimley says... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...it's the right thing to do.

    1. Re:Wilform Brimley says... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Holy shit, Wilford Brimley! I just realized who the devil on my left shoulder looks like.

  146. Re:Argh. Explanation by sinnergy · · Score: 1

    Actually, I've been on campus practically every day since 1995.

  147. Re:Over-wired? and tooo far ahead of the curve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perhaps they'd rather not spend money repeatedly re-wiring the LAN as bandwidth requirements increase.

    And how many 16,000 drop rewires have you managed, from conception, to bid, to install?

    What? None? Then SHUT THE FUCK UP.

    If you had half a clue, you'd know that a proper wiring job means that re-wiring is not so bad.

    Given that they probably spent 5 - 10x what it would of cost to wire the rooms for 100Mbit in 1993 and no students will actually stress a 100Mbit connection for another 10 years (in terms of practical applications, not P2P or warez sharing), maybe you can see how a 20 year return on 10x the cost probably isn't a good thing.

    Furthermore, in that 20 years, each connection probably saw at a minimum 5 "new" students each having to purchase a $200 media converter.

    Oh, yeah, that makes a lot of sense.

    Over 20 years:

    5x - 10x initial cost
    + $1000 per drop charged to students in the form of a media converter

    As opposed to:

    3x initial cost (1x for initial install and then 2x for install of Cat5e for 1000MBit)

    Somebody better have gotten fired for that math.

  148. Most wired? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I bet that my campus is more wired that those nasty little universities. They have electric wires going to every dorm!

  149. High Fiber Diet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did anyone else think that this was could be about dorm food? More fruit and veggies, some oat flakes for breakfast? It could change the input/output ballance for the entire student body.....

  150. Ahh, but how fat is the pipe to outside? by Behrooz · · Score: 1

    I can see it now, the ultimate grudge match.

    LADIES AND GENTLEMEN! In this corner welcome our UNDEFEATED defending CHAMPION, SIXTEEN THOUSAND GIGABIT FIBER PORTS IN STUDENT DORM ROOMS!

    And tonight's challenger, ready to take on the world... A MULTIPLE OC-192 CONNECTION OUTBOUND TO THE WORLD OF P2P FILESHARING!

    The bell rings, GIGABIT DORMS COMES OUT SWINGING... and it's A KO! THE OC-192 HAS MELTED! COMPLETELY VAPORIZED, THIS IS INCREDIBLE!


    Back to the drawing board. :)

    --
    "We have to go forth and crush every world view that doesn't believe in tolerance and free speech." - David Brin
  151. Netgear GC102 Gigabit Ethernet Media Converter by sharkey · · Score: 1

    Why am I reminded of Hillenbrand Hall at Purdue? Brand new dorm, "ethernet in every room" trumpted from the rooftops, *parallel port* ethernet adapters provided to students for a hefty fee.

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  152. 12 lanes instead of 2 by big+daddy+kane · · Score: 1

    its not only about down speeds, but space. my school is fiber around campus but cat5 in classes, none of the boxen here could handle the raw power of a fiber connection, but it gives them room for file sharing and accomidating several thousand pc's on one network.

  153. Here's the real figures by Nintendork · · Score: 1
    1000baseT uses all four wire pairs and will run on most CAT5. Advertising says that it requires CAT5e, but that's just the lowest spec they can guarantee will work because it's got higher requirements that crappy CAT5 can't meet. CAT5 has been around since 1991 and because the University upgraded their network six years ago, I'd imagine that it's good quality.

    According to their VP of IS, they were future proofing to save money in the long term. I just hope they tested their current CAT5 for 1000baseT operation and it failed (I doubt it). If it was good enough, 1000baseT would have carried them through at least another six years and they would have only needed to upgrade the switches. Something tells me that this VP was just spending for the bling-bling and is a non-technical, overpaid, PHB. If I'm right, the fucker should be fired for wasting school and student money. A friend of mine working at a pretty big company just went through the same ordeal with his PHB. She (The PHB) got featured in an article because she upgraded to the buzzword "Fiber".

    Check out these links for some good information and specs. Also, I managed to dig up some information provided by the company that installed the fiber.

    -Lucas

  154. But you're still in Ohio... by Dr+Rick · · Score: 1

    No matter how you spin it, you're still in Ohio. Now if they supplied free beer (to help you forget where you are) along with that fast network access...

    --

    Dr. Rick
    - "It's such a fine line between clever and stupid" (Nigel Tufnel)
    - Zort! (Pinky)
  155. My school sucks compared to this one by Loco's_Geek_Goddess · · Score: 1

    I wish my school did that. My university is stuck in the 1980's. They have a fiber optic cable running underground on campus but they're too afraid to use, I guess. They would rather let the network get so bogged down and use out-of-date technology.

  156. CWRU by RayBender · · Score: 1
    Case Western Reserve University.

    Hmm. Is that some kind of back-up in case the real universities don't admit you?

    --
    Human genome = 3 billion base pairs = 6 GBit. Windows + Office = 20 Gbit. Which is more impressive?
  157. University of Kentucky... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, now that you've read about the cream of the crop, now read about the utter piece of crap the University of Kentucky is.

    The University of Kentucky has cablemodems in ALL dorms--excluding the new ones currently being built and expected to open Fall 2005. They suffer from the exact same problems as normal (the more the less merrier) and ocasionally screw up and need to get "rebooted," meaning unplug it and plug it back in, WAIT 3-10 minutes for it to establish a link. Next, the speed is capped at 100KBps and upload capped at 5KBps (to deter filesharing and game playing). UK saw that it is better to install cablemodems instead of hard wiring campus.

    Wireless? Yeah, we have that 802.11b... and sadly, it's the fastest connection on campus (where available and not in the dorms!).

  158. Make heads turn at the LAN party by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess that beast needs the handle just so you can carry it.

  159. Re:Ahemn Dude! by fiftyfly · · Score: 1

    And I'm sure this person prob doesn't think twice about a little wardriving or what have you.

    --
    "Sanity is not statistical", George Orwell, "1984"
  160. Mandatory Warning.. by ctime · · Score: 1

    Hey, that's funny, I didn't see anything reminding users to "not look directly at laser with remaining eye".

    Ok, ok, so the fiber is multimode and is lit up with LEDs, give me a break.

  161. Re:Argh. Explanation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But Case DID dump tens of millions of dollars on the network in recent years.

    The estimate of the cost in the residence halls alone, which is only maybe 2500 of those 16000 ports, was $7 million. We were able to come up with that esimate based on the statement that the $400 yearly technology fee would take seven years to pay for the installation and there are about 2500 students. That's $2800 per port, and the cabling was already installed!

    That was just for distribution equipment and the cost of replacing network equipment for students. Then add the other 13500 ports. Then add wireless. Then add operating costs. Then you have tens of millions of dollars.

    Other schools don't come near that port cost, including the cost running new wiring. It's quite a cost difference that, in some way, shape or form, the students eventually pay for!

  162. GigE over copper versus GigE over fiber by niteguy · · Score: 1

    Currently, all of the Gigabit Ethernet in our network is over multimode fiber. We will probably start using Gigabit over copper (1000baseTX) in the next couple of months. Does anyone have some first-hand experiences with Gig over copper (positive or negative) to share with /. ?

  163. Uh-oh by coolMikeUSC · · Score: 1

    Coed porn sites are REALLY in trouble!

    --
    Ever notice how fast Windows runs? Neither do I - get Mac OS
  164. That's good! by billstewart · · Score: 1

    That also takes care of one of the concerns I had about their system, which was access for laptops that don't have GigE in them. (Sure, you can get a GigE switch for about $100 now that'll connect your $200 fiber/GigE to your laptop's 10/100, but it's yet another annoying frob to pay for.)

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks