Slashdot Mirror


Bill Gates Gives $20M to CMU for New Building

touretzky writes "Carnegie Mellon University announced on Tuesday that The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation had donated $20 million toward the cost of a new building to be called the "Gates Center for Computer Science". Some faculty have suggested that in acknowledgment of Mr. Gates' profound influence on the computer software industry, the building should be painted bright blue."

165 of 919 comments (clear)

  1. Before you ask by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yes, the building will have Windows, but the Office will cost extra.

    1. Re:Before you ask by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      And plenty of back doors.

    2. Re:Before you ask by oskard · · Score: 2, Funny

      The entrance will say "Press any key to continue_"

      --
      Sigs are for Terrorists.
    3. Re:Before you ask by baywulf · · Score: 5, Funny

      And whenever ask someone for help inside the building the paperclips start dancing.

    4. Re:Before you ask by freakmn · · Score: 5, Funny

      ...and the exit will say start...

      --
      warning: This post is likely to contain gobs of dripping sarcasm. Consume at your own risk.
    5. Re:Before you ask by tiredwired · · Score: 5, Funny

      And it is going to look just like a building Apple built 5 years ago.

    6. Re:Before you ask by Gary+Destruction · · Score: 2, Funny

      -If you get injured, you can visit Dr. Watson -The executive floor will have a terrace called Outlook -The employee lounge will have a small balcony called Outlook Express

    7. Re:Before you ask by scum-e-bag · · Score: 2, Funny

      ...and it shall henceforth be known as the BBOD (Blue Building of Death)

      --
      Does it go on forever?
    8. Re:Before you ask by mattjb0010 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Ctrl-Alt-Delete is the key combination for the front door

    9. Re:Before you ask by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Once you're inside you have to push the door marked ENTRY to get out.

    10. Re:Before you ask by Forbman · · Score: 2, Funny

      ...and no discernable security systems, and only one person at a time can enter and use the building at one time.

    11. Re:Before you ask by commodoresloat · · Score: 3, Funny

      ... and standard building maintenance will include completely powering down all the electricity in the building and then powering it back up again at random intervals.

    12. Re:Before you ask by NanoGator · · Score: 3, Funny

      "The new penguin building is expected shortly after the MS building. "

      Shortly? It'll take 4 years for the tenants to finish building it!

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    13. Re:Before you ask by DenDave · · Score: 2, Funny

      I have Visual fucking Studio sessions that have been running for far, far longer than two days. Can we watch?

      --
      -if at first you don't succeed, stay the heck away from paragliding.
    14. Re:Before you ask by njvic · · Score: 3, Funny

      20M? Surely 640K would be enough?

    15. Re:Before you ask by theguyfromsaturn · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, but they won't be "tenants" but the real owners of the building. Each will bring a few bricks or a bag of cement to participate in the collective construction. And everybody will be allowed to add extensions and new wings to the building. It will be a pleasant mix of the gothic cathedral, and more than a little sprinkling of the mauresque bazaar. And let's not forget a little touch of the IKEA mansion.

      --
      I like my dinosaurs feathery, and my pterosaurs hairy (or is it pycnofibery?)
    16. Re:Before you ask by Ingolfke · · Score: 5, Funny

      So true. And actually there will be three buildings built only one used. They'll start with a single design, but a left handed architect will decide that they really should have a doorknobs for left handed people so he'll copy the plans, rework all of them for left handed folks and start his own building project.

      Once the contractors are brought into the picture they'll wage a holy war over which building materials are the best. The original design will be built in steel b/c it's such a robust and flexible choice. One of contractors will completely reject the rigid structure steel requires you to work in, instead he'll choose a more flexible material, clay, because he used that once to make this wonderful outdoor grille. The left handed building will use brick b/c they're different and don't want to be mainstream.

      The tenets will show up to help build the building b/c, this is a community project right. 98% of the tenets will walk around the construction site complaining about how nothing is done and how this and that need to be changed. Occassionaly people will jump in by building out their offices, or enhancing the restroom facilities near their office.

      After 6 months a sign will go up announcing the completion of the project in 3 weeks. After another 6 months the sign has will still be there. 3 years later the clay project will have fallen in on itself several times, eventually becoming a worthless pile of unsightly clay. The left handed building will be completed, and will be loved by all left handed people, but will never be used by the faculty who tend to be mostly right handed. Teh left handed building will gain no mainstream acceptance. The steel building will be completed as well. Unfortunately it is the most sterile unsightly building you've ever seen. Minimilism could learn a thing or two from this building. There are no electrical outlets in the offices, only bare wires that "allow you to interface directly with the electrical module". Nice feature.

      The residents of the Gates building have been watching for four years while these building were built. They'll talk about how much more robust steel is and how they wish they had more of it in their building. They'll talk about how nice the brick is, and the left handed tenets will dream of a day when they'll get left handed doors and talk about banding together and migrating all at once. Several people will talk about all of the space over in the steel building, but will complain that the tenets are hard to talk to because they're always fixing things in their building and all that manual labor makes the whole building wreak of sweat, the hygeine habit of the steel building's tenets is generally questioned. One of the women complain that when she went over to the steel building and asked to use the restroom, she was pointed an empty room, when she asked why the room was empty she was met w/ a nasty look and a sharp "Hey it's free lady! Build it yourself. We can't do everything for you... newbies."

      Slashdot - News and commentary on par w/ CBS

    17. Re:Before you ask by PastaLover · · Score: 2, Informative

      Copyright is automatic whenever you write something down. You probably mean trademarking.

  2. Poor Bill by JPM+NICK · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Even when he tries to do something nice, he gets flamed. The man just donated 20 million to the school. give him a break

    1. Re:Poor Bill by vishmaster · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You have to remember Bill is first a Businessman and then a Philanthropist - What bill is indulging here is what is known as Social Investing - Heres how he makes up for the 20mil he spends - 1.Inculcate the 'Microsoft Culture' into the every Person/Animal/THing that ever steps into that building - 2.Set up a future harvesting ground for hiring into his empire when the time is right. Now that they have already been taught the 'Microsoft way' 3.Spread the good word about Microsoft - 20mil worth of marketing does not seem to have the same effect. and yes.. 4.Maybe help the academic community actually grow - PROVIDED - its in the 'Microsoft Way' Not so Poor After all Bill.

      --
      ..And the people bowed and prayed, To the neon gods they made.
    2. Re:Poor Bill by Epistax · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Sorry I just can't let "poor Bill" get past everyone. Once again, he used the word "Poor" to describe "Bill". Where "Poor" does have many meanings, I feel that he is so overwhelmingly not "Poor" in one definition as to completely knock out all others from the ballpark.

      That being said the best gifts are the anonymous ones. When it's not anonymous, sure, he's giving $20 million and that's great, but he's it at least partly for his name. Still, I'm not complaining that he's doing it.

    3. Re:Poor Bill by smittyoneeach · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Also, there is
      Established in 1988, the CERT® Coordination Center (CERT/CC) is a center of Internet security expertise, located at the Software Engineering Institute, a federally funded research and development center operated by Carnegie Mellon University.
      Now, if 20,000 large doesn't freshen your breath to CERT, dunno what will.
      If you don't like the news, buy the press.
      Maybe these were distortion-free dollars, or something...
      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    4. Re:Poor Bill by SB5 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You know whats great about CMU? Its got a very large anti-Microsoft culture. But when Microsoft comes to town for recruitment day, its the largest turnout ever.

      --
      If what you are reading sounds funny, or sarcastic, lame, or stupid
      it is because it is supposed to be. just laugh
    5. Re:Poor Bill by brilinux · · Score: 3, Informative

      I was actually at the party to celebrate his gift yesterday at Newell-Simon (the free food force overcame the Anti-Bill Gates force), and through talking to people, I had actually heard that it would be named after Turing, but I guess that is something else. The problem is, though, this guy is really rich, and yet he gave only $20,000,000 of the $50,000,000 required for the building, meaning that they need to raise $30,000,000 from other people for a building that will be named after someone else. I hope that they succeed, because it would be nice to see yet another construction project on campus, but it seems rude not to give more for something named after him.

    6. Re:Poor Bill by aixou · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Do we have to dissect every good thing that people do?

      Let's dissect some other things:

      your mom doesn't really love you for you, she loves you because of how you make her feel.

      The fireman who saves you in the building is really only doing it because he wants his buddies to call him a hero.

      Someone who gives a homeless person a dollar is only doing it because they don't want to get shot by the homeless man.

      Your fiancee is only marrying you because she doesn't want to have to be self-sufficient.

      and finally: Stallman does what he does to impress the ladies. ;)

      Can't we just let people do good things sometimes? There is always some element of selfishness in every good deed we do. Let it go. It's a win win situation. Bill gives a great contribution to a school, and he gets to pimp himself a little. so the fuck what.

    7. Re:Poor Bill by DrEldarion · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That's how everything is. People always hate the big guy until they get a chance to be a part.

      You can see the same thing with anti-American sentiment in other countries - people will be very quick to badmouth the US, but start giving out free plane tickets and you'll get mobbed.

    8. Re:Poor Bill by tftp · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A thief steals your car and then offers you one free ride. Should you be grateful or angry?

    9. Re:Poor Bill by whoppers · · Score: 2, Insightful

      20 million from a school that provides him with the means to make 200 million each year and he likely charges 2 million each year for software licensing, not including the students/sheep that purchse MS products.

      He'll get a break from me when he creates a quality product for a quality price.

    10. Re:Poor Bill by linguae · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I agree. I hope this isn't troll/flamebait, but I'm ready to burn some karma, so here it goes....

      Bill Gates may be one of the founders and leaders of a certain company that we all know and love [microsoft.com], and there is a lot of things that I don't like about Microsoft (Windows, convicted monopoly, business practices) but Gates himself is an interesting person. He started out as a geek like most of us here. He also does a lot of good things, like donate to schools, AIDS and cancer research, and other charity organizations. Now, I don't like the way that he has ran Microsoft, but I feel that it is important in some cases to separate Gates and his organization from MS. Gates may be "evil," but I think that he shouldn't be flamed for helping out or his donations; not everything he does is a part of an evil plan for M$ to take over the world.

    11. Re:Poor Bill by log2.0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I consider myself to be a bit anti-american. If I have the choice of supporting a homogenous American company vs. something else, I'll take the something else.

      Having said that, if you give me free plane tickets to any 1st world country, I would take them :)

      --
      Can your karma go above being Excellent?
    12. Re:Poor Bill by Aussie · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sorta like Pablo Escobar ?
      Many Columbians still think he was a good bloke because of the great charitable donations.

    13. Re:Poor Bill by math+major · · Score: 5, Funny

      Of course people go to the recruitment events. Free food! A handful of people actually go because they want to work for Microsoft, but most of the people are there to heckle and get free stuff. Microsoft shirts make great rugs. I always wanted to win a laptop in one of their raffles just so I could say I got a free laptop from Microsoft and put Linux on it. At last year's recruiting speech, one of the people asked "How many of you have heard of the Blaster virus?" Everyone raised their hand. "How many of you hate Microsoft because of the Blaster virus?" The guy sitting next to me: "Just because of that?" Applause.

    14. Re:Poor Bill by SendBot · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Actually, the real problem with AIDS relief is that patents make the pharmacudical industry a profiteering venture, to the point of disallowing affordable alternatives to such a degree that the Gates Foundation's donations would amount to a few drops in the bucket compared to the savings that a true free market would allow.

      The kicker is that BillG is a proponent of the situation that puts AIDS care out of reach for millions so that pharmacudical companies can maintain their profits from disabling fair competition. This is a complete exploitation of the necessity for AIDS treatment made possible by our wonderful patent system.

      You can read more about all this here:
      http://www.globalissues.org/EnvIssues/Population/A IDS.asp

    15. Re:Poor Bill by bishop666 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Put things in perspective. Considering his net worth it's like comparing a person worth 30 grand giving $10 to charity. The charity wouldn't be likely to name a building after you and trust me you'd miss the ten dollars more than Gates will miss the twenty mill. Before his recent Philanthropy he gave away the smallest percentage of his income of any of the top one hundred. It was only after this was pointed out to him that he saw the light. It's more PR than charity.

    16. Re:Poor Bill by awtbfb · · Score: 2, Informative


      Now, if 20,000 large doesn't freshen your breath to CERT, dunno what will.

      Actually CERT is within SEI which is pretty much a free-standing entity.

    17. Re:Poor Bill by Xenna · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I certainly would expect anyone giving out free plane tickets to Europe, Asia, Africa or any other exotic place would be mobbed similarly. I'm not one to pass up a free intercontinental flight myself, even if N. Korea would be handing them out.

      But you're probably implying they'd want to immigrate. In poor countries you probably have a point. In western Europe (where I live) the few US haters that I know (there aren't that many) would definitely not be interested in a green card.

      I wouldn't pass up on an opportunity to work and live in the US for a few years. I wish the western world would get together and make this kind of exchange (both ways) a lot easier, would be good for everyone. It would also promote a little more mutual understanding, which, reading this subthread, seems badly needed.

    18. Re:Poor Bill by stonecypher · · Score: 2, Interesting

      CERT is basically government-funded. The reason they're at the university is that almost all government-funded big computing stuff is at either a university or a shady secret building with no windows. The SEI is one of three government installations at CMU, alongside the supercomputing center and the Mellon Institute (the last of which is also industry funded; yay Westinghouse.)

      CMU gets a $20m contribution every year. Nobody in the university is particularly impressed. Certainly not CERT, who have dealt with enough of Microsoft's issues to know better. They're no less jaded than you are.

      Gates isn't trying to impress the university. He's trying to impress the undergraduates. If this means that two out of every hundred undergrads are now pro-microsoft, given CMU's success rate, he's just made a good investment moneywise. That's why MS and Borland give their toolchains to universities, why Apple pushes its platform but why clonemakers don't: they're all pushing their particular interface, because the academia drives novelty, and novelty owns this market. We stick to what we're used to and when looking for new we default to what we've heard of. Gates is buying familiarity, and given the experience I've had with doe-eyed freshmen, it's working.

      That said, he's also a hell of a real philanthropist. Not all of the money he gives away has an ulterior motive. Even if you go through my particular views on what he's given away as dirty or not-dirty, and only count the not-dirty stuff, he's still the single largest philanthropist in history, donating hugely to agrarian and immunological concerns.

      He may be a scumbag businessman, but he's turning a lot of that money to organized capital-g Good efforts which were otherwise going ignored.

      We tend to forget that Carnegie was so hard to his workers that he built apartment buildings where the apartments had corridors between rooms that were half-height and offset upwards, so that apartments could be stacked more efficiently; it is arguable that much of Carnegie's success came from skill in screwing his workers (he basically invented both the company shop and company housing unless you count the Egyptian pharoahs; he's basically the reason for the move to unions, yellow dog laws and the Homestead riots.)

      Why do we forget? Because, in his old age feeling guilty, Carnegie tried to give it all away. (He was so rich that he wasn't able to spend his fortune in his dying decade; he got about 80% of it out the door, and had to give the rest away as trusts.) He established the world's largest library chain, including modern governmental library systems (yes, there are more Carnegie libraries than US libraries.) He established many of the US' great cultural centers, including one so focal to American stage culture for fifty years that even now, another fifty years later his name brings to mind the same joke in all of our heads (Practice!) He established one of the world's great museums as part of one of the world's few nongovernmental museum chains, which maintains what are largely considered three of the world's great art collections today (you go to the Louvre for renaissance painting; you go to MOMA for experimental painting; you go to Garnegie for contemporary and modern art.) One of the world's great travelling art exhibitions is named for him and maintained by one of his trusts. Many of the nation's great parks are maintained by his money. Many of the world's great mansions belonged to him, his family or his friends. He gave huge trusts silently to dozens of what are still our great universities to promote industry and technology. One of our great universities was built on his money (Mellon pulled out at the last second, when it was too late to remove his name. Carnegie was a great man. Mellon was a scumbag.)

      I hate to say it, especially here where he's so hated, but in fifty years when his business tactics are forgotten and nobody's heard of Stac Electronics or Gary Kildall or OS/2, largely because of his phila

      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
  3. Blue by adisakp · · Score: 2

    How the heck would the color blue pay homage to Bill ?

    1. Re:Blue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Blue Screen of Death.

    2. Re:Blue by generic-man · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Carnegie Mellon already has one blue building. It's called Donner Hall (large JPEG) and it'd be a nice joke if CMU were to name it after Gates instead. It's the residence hall where they stuff hundreds of freshmen every year.

      --
      For more information, click here.
    3. Re:Blue by freakmn · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Blue is a homonym of blew, which is the past tense of blows, which describes his software, of course! That and the BSOD, the default background color, the ocean near Washington, Washington state on some maps, and of course Bills scorching case of blue balls. (I made that last one up...)

      --
      warning: This post is likely to contain gobs of dripping sarcasm. Consume at your own risk.
  4. Blue by oskard · · Score: 5, Funny

    They can write BSOD in big white letters on the top of it.

    --
    Sigs are for Terrorists.
  5. BSOD jokes by chrispyman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Now I like BSOD jokes as much as the next person but seriously I think that's one area we can atleast applaud Microsoft at. It's really quite a rare date (or an indication of hardware failure) to see a BSOD in Windows XP. Now those damned security issues on the other hand...

    1. Re:BSOD jokes by oskard · · Score: 5, Funny

      Ahhh stop. You're killing me. No, really STOP 0x0000000A BAD_BSOD_JOKES

      --
      Sigs are for Terrorists.
    2. Re:BSOD jokes by 5i · · Score: 2, Interesting

      nope! wrong again.

      I spent 12 straight hours on saturday trying to help my brother with his XP machine.

      He wanted to use it to play games, had spent a bunch of cash on good hardware, etc... and had spent the last 3 months enlisting help from various skilled support-type geek friends to try and stop it crashing.

      It crashed, on average, about every 3 minutes. And not in one game, but in any of a whole bunch. And we're talking yes, full wipe out to BSOD and/or reboot.

      Ok, so bad vid drivers the most likely reason, sure (although any one of a dozen error code didn't help pinpoint it. And no, not memory, we full memtested it, stick by stick, removed hardware ad nauseum).

      Eventually, we put Win2k on it. An hour or so later he was up and running for a good 24 hour session, no crashes at all. .. and don't get me started about my ex's XP laptop that regularly blue screens during movie playing.

      me, I won't touch it with a bargepole, not until SP3 at least.

  6. Blue? by Selfbain · · Score: 2, Funny

    They should paint 'IRQL not less or equal' on the side of the building.

    --
    Well, it has never been successfully tested.
  7. Why doesn't Bill Gates blow more of his money? by comwiz56 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Why doesn't Bill gates run around spending money on fun stuff? NSYNC guys almost buy a trip a to space. Woz has like 20 segways (and plays on a segway plo team). But why doesnt Bill Gates spend his money on such crazy things?

    1. Re:Why doesn't Bill Gates blow more of his money? by Mskpath3 · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Some interesting info on the far reaching economic impacts Gates would have if he spent truly large amounts of his fortune

      Gates is to be commended for this. He's no slouch when it comes to spreading the wealth around.

    2. Re:Why doesn't Bill Gates blow more of his money? by khendron · · Score: 2, Informative

      Apparently you haven't yet seen his $97M house.

      --
      Life is like a web application. Sometime you need cookies just to get by.
    3. Re:Why doesn't Bill Gates blow more of his money? by oskard · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "giving away money effectively is almost as hard as earning it the first place."
      -Bill Gates

      Great quote, interesting article, not sure if I agree with it entirely, but the quote gives a cool perspective.

      By the way the Bill & Melinda Society (or whatever) do a lot for charities, students, colleges, and NPO's.

      --
      Sigs are for Terrorists.
  8. Microsoft at CMU by generic-man · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Funny thing about Carnegie Mellon -- there's a lot of people there who spell Microsoft with a dollar sign and refer to it as the "evil empire," yet every Microsoft presentation is standing-room only. There are plenty of people there that actually respect Microsoft as a company, and of course President Jared Cohon was more than happy to accept a $20 million gift.

    Now the Gates Center is a $50+ million project. If you want to name the building in your honor instead, you could always kick in the rest of the dough.

    --
    For more information, click here.
    1. Re:Microsoft at CMU by bit01 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Microsoft presentation is standing-room only.

      Reminds me of the crusty old Republican grandpa that attended all the Democrat conventions. His reason? "Just ta keep ma disgust afresh"

      Attendence does not imply support. I'd probably attend such presentations. Anyway, like all good universities CMU supports a variety of viewpoints, not the mono-culture that M$ would like to impose.

      ---

      It's wrong that an intellectual property creator should not be rewarded for their work.
      It's equally wrong that an IP creator should be rewarded too many times for the one piece of work, for exactly the same reasons.
      Reform IP law and stop the M$/RIAA abuse.

    2. Re:Microsoft at CMU by abb3w · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Microsoft presentation is standing-room only.
      Reminds me of the crusty old Republican grandpa that attended all the Democrat conventions. His reason? "Just ta keep ma disgust afresh"
      Keep your freinds close, and your enemies closer.

      --
      //Information does not want to be free; it wants to breed.
  9. Gates will be the Carnegie of the 22nd century by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    By the time he's dead, there will be so many buildings with his name on them, he'll be everywhere, like all the towns with Carnegie libraries today. And like Carnegie, he'll be remembered fondly for all the stuff he did that still endures, and not for the things Slashdot likes to bash him for today.

    Like it or not...

    1. Re:Gates will be the Carnegie of the 22nd century by FearUncertaintyDoubt · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Bill Gates is the John D. Rockerfeller of his day. A guy who engaged in massive monopolistic practices to build the world's most immense fortune, only to give most of it away. Each took a fledgling industry (petroleum and PCs) and made them into corporate behemoths (Standard Oil and Microsoft) through shrewdness and ruthless business practices, crushing rivals with every dirty trick possible. Rockerfeller regularly hired employes from his competitors as spies to give him inside information that he would then use to destroy his competition. Both Rockerfeller and Gates were/are completely unrepentant for their deeds, and believed they had done nothing wrong but follow the best policies of good business.

      John D. Rockerfeller Jr. (John D.'s son) was the guy who actually spent a great deal of the money, and the one who had a passion for it; John D. had one passion -- the Standard Oil business. It took a generation for people to forget the Rockerfeller name stood for vicious anti-competitive trusts which left human wreckage in its wake, and turn the Rockerfeller name into one that meant philanthropy. Gates is managing that within a generation, although he did not have to start out in the public relations hole John D. did. Gates, however vilified he is by the slashdot crowd, has been more a hero to the average American. America once despised its capitalist masters. Now we lionize them.

      The Rockerfellers did not follow Carnegie's lead. Carnegie took a lot of criticism for his rather shameless self-promotion. Rockerfeller had a strict religious upbringing and considered giving a duty, one that was its own reward, and was not meant for glorifying oneself. You'll see Gates memorial this-or-that here and there, but for the most part, it doesn't look like Bill Gates is interested in having lots of things named after him.

      History will be very forgiving to Bill Gates. People today think anti-trust legislation is some sort of government power trip to stifle progress, not a vital safeguard that restrained some of the most brutal machinery of captialism ever unleashed. Rockerfeller was shunned and vilified by the presidents and other politicians of his day, and now he's considered a great benefactor to mankind. How much more is Gates going to be remembered as the great success story who gave his money for the good of others? Any blemishes on his character will be easily waved away as jealous competitors, not anyone with a serious grief.

      Another interesting note: the guy that John D. first hired to be his chief for philanthropy was named Frederick Gates.

    2. Re:Gates will be the Carnegie of the 22nd century by omahajim · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Bill Gates is the John D. Rockerfeller of his day.

      Slashdot needs to revise the moderation system to allow scores higher than 5. Too large a number of the 5:Funny or 5:Interesting posts are not nearly as deserved of their scores as the parent above are. There truly needs to be a next level, above the simply cutesy posts.

    3. Re:Gates will be the Carnegie of the 22nd century by IGnatius+T+Foobar · · Score: 2, Interesting

      How much more is Gates going to be remembered as the great success story who gave his money for the good of others? Any blemishes on his character will be easily waved away as jealous competitors, not anyone with a serious grief.

      I think I speak for quite a few people when I say that I really don't care, as long as the computers a generation from now aren't locked into end-to-end Microsoft products. Business historians remember Carnegie and Rockefeller as robber barons; they'll remember Gates as a robber baron too, and that's good enough for me. While it's a bit sad that Microsoft made the bulk of the money from the PC revolution while doing almost none of the innovation, as a computer enthusiast I just want their crappy software to be gone (or at least non-monopoly) by the time my kids are in college.

      --
      Tired of FB/Google censorship? Visit UNCENSORED!
  10. Unfortunately.... by One+Louder · · Score: 4, Funny

    Unfortunately none of the doors have locks and all of the windows are wide open by default.

  11. CMU is an Excellent School by I_Love_Pocky! · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm always afraid of huge corporate donations to CS departments, because they tend to want to push the program in a certain direction. I don't think it helps anyone to have a Microsoft centric CS education, because CS shouldn't be about practical implementations, but rather theoretical concepts. I hope CMU isn't tainted by this donation.

    I'm not just getting down on Microsoft either, I would feel wary about any large software company. On the other hand, it is a very nice thing for Mr. Gates to do. I'm always impressed by the really great things he and his wife choose to do with all of that money.

  12. Cheapskate by gorbachev · · Score: 5, Informative

    Brown University got $100M today. Bill's cheap! :)

    --
    In Soviet Russia, I ruled you
    1. Re:Cheapskate by captnitro · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The donation was made by one Sidney Frank, whose importation popularization of drinks we were fond of in college (and still are) made him lots of cash.

      It's a good day to be a college dropout, apparently.

      It makes me a little proud to think that you can still work hard and with a little luck have your name on a building, regardless of things like educational status or initial wealth. This applies more to Sidney, I suppose, than Bill. (Now, the fact that it was a half-stolen, poorly written OS and liquor sales to college kids is quite another thing, and I'm sure everybody's going to remember that in replies to this post. Have fun!)

  13. And of course... by nwbvt · · Score: 2, Insightful

    On slashdot someone will complain that this charitable act is just an attempt to push his company's products on college students and the mods will make it +5 insightful.

    --
    Mathematics is made of 50 percent formulas, 50 percent proofs, and 50 percent imagination.
    1. Re:And of course... by gc8005 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Geez - how lame. This charitable act is just an attempt to push his company's products on college students. Someone mod me up as insightful.

    2. Re:And of course... by nathanh · · Score: 4, Insightful
      On slashdot someone will complain that this charitable act is just an attempt to push his company's products on college students and the mods will make it +5 insightful.

      Even worse, Slashdot will be crapflooded with dozens of people preemptively complaining about the Slashdot bias, and they will be moderated to +5 Insightful as well.

    3. Re:And of course... by register_ax · · Score: 2, Interesting

      lol, morals are human-defined so there is always a "right" and "wrong" and they will always have to be disputed.

      It is unintelligent to not critique an action that will prove directly beneficial to the person partaking in the act. It should be recognized that this industry is the same industry he is in. That is what debate/discussion is, looking at various points of view. Of course slashdot has a slant and to be honest, that's why I come here. I got a lot of the pop perspective from those other moving pieces of matter I happen to bump into in that thing called RealLife. If that comment wasn't made, or yours, I wouldn't be coming here. I like the perspective, not that it's right or wrong mind you. Thanks for your comment.

  14. Re:Bright Blue eh? by gcaseye6677 · · Score: 2, Funny

    It will be ugly all right, if it looks anything like this Bill Gates computer science building.

  15. Other building features by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    1. To enter, you push a button and 5 minutes later the door opens
    2. All digital locks can be opened with the admin password 1-2-3-4-5
    3. Vibrating Window panes will cause random crashes
    4. All wall decorations are essential and directly integrated into the building and cannot be removed without destroying the entire structure

    1. Re:Other building features by ValourX · · Score: 2, Funny

      1-2-3-4-5? That's the combination on my luggage!

  16. Re:In a Related Story by Knytefall · · Score: 2, Informative

    Not exactly a check -- just free software. Check out the press release.

  17. In front of the building... by rasafras · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...you will be greeted by a 20 foot iron sculpture of clippy.

    That, and the building won't have any locks.

  18. Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by reporter · · Score: 4, Interesting
    About 10 years ago, Stanford University completed construction of its new computer science building. You can see a picture of it. Several companies and individuals donated money to its construction. The majority of the funds came from a group of Japanese companies. Interestingly, among individuals, Bill Gates donated the largest percentage, and Stanford University named the entire building after him.

    When news of "Gates" becoming the apellation of the building broke, heated discussions appeared on the local university electronic bulletin board. Many people were dismayed that Bill Gates, a college dropout with little knowledge of computer science, would receive the honor of having the computer science building named after him. It is no ordinary building. It is the building housing the pre-eminent computer-science department that is among the top 3 in the nation.

    One mathematics professor lamented that money buys anything -- including undeserved honors. He commented that Stanford University might as well name the building after "Donald Trump" since he is a billionaire.

    Personally, I object to honoring Bill Gates for anything. As far as I am concerned, he is an unethical shmuck who bears principal responsibility for the suicide of Gary Kildall. Search on "Gary Kildall" if you do not know who he is.

    1. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by GeorgeMcBay · · Score: 5, Insightful


      One mathematics professor lamented that money buys anything -- including undeserved honors. He commented that Stanford University might as well name the building after "Donald Trump" since he is a billionaire.


      Your mathematics professor should take a refresher course in logic. Bill Gates paid for most of the building. Donald Trump didn't. See the difference?

      In any case, as long as you have a shiny nice new building on Bill's dime, who gives a crap what it is called? I never gave a second thought to the names on the buildings at my university even though many were named after robberbarons significantly more sinister than Bill Gates has ever been in their day and within their own respective markets.


      As far as I am concerned, he is an unethical shmuck who bears principal responsibility for the suicide of Gary Kildall


      That's funny, I always thought Gary Kildall bore principal responsibility for his own suicide. Isn't that what suicide is?

    2. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative
      Your mathematics professor should take a refresher course in logic. Bill Gates paid for most of the building. Donald Trump didn't. See the difference?
      First, the poster clearly stated that Bill Gates did not pay for most of the building. Second, the point of the mathematics professor was that it wouldn't be appropriate to name the building after Donald Trump even if he had payed for most of the building. Hence, it shouldn't be appropriate to name the building after Bill Gates simply because he provided a large chunk of the financing. I hope this clears things up for you.
    3. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 2, Funny
      Second, the point of the mathematics professor was that it wouldn't be appropriate to name the building after Donald Trump even if he had payed for most of the building.
      If that's what he meant, maybe he should have said that instead.
      it shouldn't be appropriate to name the building after Bill Gates simply because he provided a large chunk of the financing.
      Why, because an unknown mathematician and an anonymous coward say so?
      --

      How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
    4. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by ArsSineArtificio · · Score: 5, Interesting
      One mathematics professor lamented that money buys anything -- including undeserved honors. He commented that Stanford University might as well name the building after "Donald Trump" since he is a billionaire.

      All of Stanford University itself is named after a railroad robber baron.

      --
      All employees must wash hands before seeking equitable relief.
    5. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by secolactico · · Score: 4, Insightful

      As far as I am concerned, he is an unethical shmuck who bears principal responsibility for the suicide of Gary Kildall. Search on "Gary Kildall" if you do not know who he is.

      I had no idea as to who Gary Kildall was. I did a quick search and found out. The cause of death is not clear tho, but nowhere it says it was suicide.

      Now, I believe you have your reasons to blame Gates for Kildall's death, but in my own humble opinion, nobody is responsible for someone else's suicide. If you take the decision to kill yourself, no external factor is to blame.

      As for "honoring" him by naming the building after him, well, he is paying for it. If the donation comes with strings attached and Stanford doesn't like it, they can always turn him down.

      He might be a college dropout with little knowledge of CS, but he *is* doing something for the field: he is donating resources, just like the person who doesn't know anything about medicine, but donates money for a new hospital wing, or simply gives blood. You contribute with what you can.

      (yes, I know Gates isn't probably doing it out of the goodness of his heart... he is getting publicity for it, but does it really matters so long as the job gets done?)

      --
      No sig
    6. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by Moridineas · · Score: 3, Insightful
      You can hate on Gates all you want, as is your right, but to simply describe him as "a college dropout with little knowledge of computer science" is not exactly right. He was in fact a very talented coder in his day--I know this isn't the same as a computer scientist, but quite frankly id rather be a coder any day of the tweek.

      I guess the tought of a top CS building being named for the top software companies top employee doesn't really rankle me that much.

    7. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by atrizzah · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've never read anything to suggest that Gary Kildall committed suicide at all. Look him up in the all knowing Wikipedia

    8. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by saden1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No, his point is computer science buildings should be named after men who given computer science more than they have taken from it. Men who did the research to advance the field. While I admire Bill Gates for his charitable work, I don't think he himself has contributed much to the field of computer science. If the building was for a Business School, by all means name him after Bill Gates.

      --

      -----
      One is born into aristocracy, but mediocrity can only be achieved through hard work.
    9. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by Dirtside · · Score: 4, Insightful
      If you take the decision to kill yourself, no external factor is to blame.
      Not that this is what happened with Gates and Kildall, but if I were to (for example) manipulate a person's life so as to get them fired from their job, bury them under a mountain of debt, cause problems with his marriage, and generally make his life a living hell, and then he committed suicide, you don't think I would bear ANY of the responsibility for it? I certainly do. And lesser actions of mine would similarly bear a smaller, but nonzero, responsibility.

      Saying that external factors cannot affect a person's decision to commit suicide doesn't seem reasonable. It's the same as saying that external factors cannot affect us at all, for any reason. Even if I did the evil things above, I certainly wouldn't be entirely to blame for his suicide (after all, he pulled the trigger, or took the pill, leapt off the bridge, whatever), but if I set up circumstances to the point where he felt like he had no way out, I would be at least partly culpable, by any reasonable moral standard. (I don't know if I could be held legally liable, in a criminal sense, although I probably could be successfully sued in civil court for wrongful death, or somesuch, assuming that his family could provide evidence).

      I don't think that responsibility is always (or even usually) as simple as "one person is completely responsible for this." If a person commits a crime, and if external circumstances can affect that, then that person is still ultimately responsible, but it doesn't mean that we should relieve him of any responsibility and let him off scot-free, NOR does it mean that we should blame him entirely and not take a hard look at what society is doing that might encourage him to be criminal.

      This really is getting off-topic; maybe I'll write a journal entry about it.

      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    10. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by GileadGreene · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Uh... hate to break it to you, but most campuses name buildings after whoever fronts the cash, not after anyone "inspiring". I find it particularly ironic that this interchange was sparked as a result of discussions at Stanford, which is named for Leland Stanford: not an academic luminary, but a man who made a lot of money in railroads and used that moeny to endow a college.

    11. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by foonf · · Score: 2, Informative

      As far as I am concerned, he is an unethical shmuck who bears principal responsibility for the suicide of Gary Kildall. Search on "Gary Kildall" if you do not know who he is.

      Maybe if you tried a different search engine you would know that the popular legend that he killed himself is not true. He was killed in a fight at a bar, and by all accounts it wasn't the least bit deliberate.

      --

      "(Man) tries to live his own life as if he were telling a story. But you have to choose: live or tell." --Sartre
    12. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by tdemark · · Score: 2, Funny

      If stadiums are any example, I'm sure another $10 million would allow CMU to call it:

      Pepsi Presents the Gates Center for Computer Science

      - Tony

    13. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by commodoresloat · · Score: 2, Funny
      I can think of a lot worse people than some geek who makes geeks mad... Hitler, Slobodan Milosevic, Saddam Hussein. There's many more that have done a lot worse than do things you don't like on computers.

      But nobody's naming a building at CMU "Milosevic Hall."

      Then again, it does have a nice ring to it....

    14. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by commodoresloat · · Score: 3, Funny
      He was killed in a fight at a bar, and by all accounts it wasn't the least bit deliberate.

      You mean Bill Gates beat him to death?

    15. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by NanoGator · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Yep - there's no denying the fact that microsoft's only strong suit has been marketing - the products ALWAYS suck"

      Maybe Windows 'sucked', but at least it sucked in such a way that millions of non-computer geeks were able to pick it up and use it comfortably. Is it so hard to acknowledge the idea that Microsoft's focus on the end user experience actually had something to do with their success?

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    16. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by pjbass · · Score: 3, Insightful

      As much as I am a Linux/open-source advocate, and do not like how Microsoft does its business today, I have a few things to point out about Microsoft and Bill Gates.

      1. How much of KDE and Gnome (now be honest) and any other "popular" window manager for X is trying to mimick the better parts of MS Windows (the only way to take the market is to emulate it, and make it work better)?
      2. Gates and Microsoft, as much as people don't want to admit, drove the PC into the mainstream use for end-user consumers. Microsoft followed others such as DEC, Sun, etc., and had something that ran on hardware of the day for academic and commercial reasons, and then took a leap (albeit Apple was already there in small representation, and Xerox just didn't market their workstation as effectively as MS did), and voila! They made a new market of people who found the usefulness of a computer at home.
      3. Being an avid gamer (in my copious amounts of spare time *grin*), I need to ask this question. Since Bill Gates didn't complete college, you're saying he doesn't know much about computer science, and therefore he really can't contribute to the field. Take John Carmack, as an example. He dropped out of college after 2 semesters. He is the person that video card manufacturers worship in the hopes he uses their architecture to pioneer the next-generation of gaming. Is he someone you'd also consider not contributing to the advance of the computer science world?

      If anything, Gates drove a company that put computer science on the map. There were many before him, and MANY after him, but he really can be credited to be behind the machine that made PC's mainstream. Please put your personal bias aside when posting about things like this. I'm sure if Carmack were to donate money to a college to buy a building, people would think that would just be damn cool, not a hypocrisy to computer science.

    17. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by gad_zuki! · · Score: 2, Informative

      A couple counterpoints:

      1. The desktop model of computering is old, really old. There are demos from the late 60's, early 70s. MS lifted its windowing ideas the same place Apple did, from Xerox. Seems everything is initially derived from Xerox.

      2. The home computer didn't hit critical mass until Netscape and the web gave people a real excuse to buy a home computer or two. Especially people who didn't at the time use a computer at work or were otherwise not in the income bracket that allowed for a $2,000+ computer.

    18. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by leonmergen · · Score: 2, Interesting
      IMHO, the whole progress after the first version of Windows wasn't innovation, but a logical route. "Hey, i've got a graphical user interface - let's make it prettier" and that's basically all that Microsoft has contibuted.

      Nothing against Microsoft and all, but Gates hasn't contributed as much as Kindall by far.

      --
      - Leon Mergen
      http://www.solatis.com
    19. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by TheCage · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Actually, Stanford is named after Leland Stanford Jr., who died of typhoid. The university was meant as a rememberence to him. A better story about the elder Leland Stanford's career and naming is the student body's attempt to have the school be the "Robber barrons"

    20. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by flacco · · Score: 2, Interesting
      While I admire Bill Gates for his charitable work, I don't think he himself has contributed much to the field of computer science.

      i think you're a bit off on the charitable work part. consider the timing of the charitable work in relation to the anti-trust trial. you'll see that it coincides quite closely with the other get-our-political-act-together moves microsoft made at that time.

      --
      pr0n - keeping monitor glass spotless since 1981.
    21. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by TheCage · · Score: 3, Informative

      I posted this previously, but Stanford was named after Leland Stanford Jr., the son of the robber baron. Junior died of typhoid fever and the University is a rememberance to him.

    22. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by jeif1k · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If that's what he meant, maybe he should have said that instead.

      The meaning of his statement seemed clear enough to me. But, then, mathematics professors assume a certain minimal degree of intelligence on the part of their audience. As you demonstrate, that requirement isn't necessarily satisfied by everyone in their audience.

      Why, because an unknown mathematician and an anonymous coward say so?

      He was restating an idea expressed by someone else. It is up to you to make up your mind whether you agree with that idea.

      Yes, difficult as that may be to believe, even you yourself have the potential for independent thought; try exercising it for a change.

    23. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by vena · · Score: 2, Insightful

      i think you're a bit off on the charitable work part yourself - or at least a bit too cynical. Gates has been giving away money since he got it to a laundry list of charitable causes, including his own. that his contributions have grown since the antitrust battle began is of little consequence - the wealth from which this charity comes has grown with it. last year he and his wife gave away more than half of their entire net worth; just over 23 billion dollars went to charity. last month, he gave away the entirety of his $3 billion share of the $75 billion shareholder payout.

      i think there's a point where you have to really look past the cynical fog and think, you know, he probably could have stopped at a couple billion if he just wanted the brownie points.

    24. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by flacco · · Score: 2, Funny
      i think there's a point where you have to really look past the cynical fog and think, you know, he probably could have stopped at a couple billion if he just wanted the brownie points.

      perhaps a donation to the FSF would clear the cynical fog ;-)

      --
      pr0n - keeping monitor glass spotless since 1981.
    25. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by 0x0d0a · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Gates and Allen coded the original Ticketmaster ticket reservation system, IIRC. Microsoft did up some productivity apps that later became Office -- if Gates was still involved in actual development then, he can take some credit.

    26. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by Analog+Anomaly · · Score: 3, Informative

      Gary Kildall... It seems you know the name but not the history. You see Gary didn't commit suicide, not as we've come to know the term. He was killed in a brawl in 1994 at a biker bar. However his contribution to the computer science society was long before Gates even knew what a Micro Computer was. Gary developed CP/M for a little company called Digital Research in 1974. Before the IBM PC hit the market, before MS-DOS, hell 9 years before a 10 meg hard drive hit the market costing just a wee bit over $3000.00 (USD) Gary was writing an operating system, supporting it, and a growing user-base. IBM offered to buy this operating system, but Gary refused, just as Radioshack had refused to buy Bill's operating system while he was working for them. Now They shell out billions to Bill, whom graciously accepted IBM's offer of $50,000 at the time.

    27. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by rnd() · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The parent is 100% accuate. Bill Gates has employed more of the top computer scientists than anyone else in the history of the world, and such employment is one of the main reasons that college kids want to major in computer science.

      --

      Amazing magic tricks

    28. Re:Something not so funny about Bill Gates ... by Total_Wimp · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Columbus didn't build the ships or man the sails or oars. He just acquired the funding and led the expeditions. He has an entire holiday named after him.

      Bill Gates does a similar job. By just about everyone's recconing, he points Microsoft in the direction he thinks it should go and the people under him make it happen. That's leadership. For that reason, and the fact that Windows is in use on 80%-90% + or the worlds personal computers, he absolutely deserves credit as one of the most influential information technology leaders ever.

      Put another way, if he gets blamed for Windows problems without having coded them, shouldn't he also get credit for it's successes?

      TW

  19. Donation??? by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 3, Insightful
    C'mon for a multi-billionare (fsck the spelling) paying someone $20M to carve your name on a building in a world famous campus is a cheap ego boost.

    If it was a real donation it would be more discretely done (eg. name it after a famous person other than Gates and perhaps put up a small plaque saying it was funded by Gate foundation).

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
  20. Re:Beatch Please! by Antithetical · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You mean like the Gates Foundation (http://www.gatesfoundation.org/default.htm)
    wher e he basically gave away almost 1.2 billion last year? Is half a billion for education plus half a billion for world health enough?

  21. It would be better spent on law school by trud · · Score: 2, Informative

    Money donated to computer science will be better spent in endowing fellowships in patent law.

    Microsoft continues to make the world a better place for lawyers and is likely eventually to hold on retainer 51% of attorneys worldwide.

  22. $20M but... by zorander · · Score: 4, Insightful

    He wants the campus to build a $50M building with it. Sound like a math problem? yeah. His money is appreciated, but he's asking the campus to build more than he's willing to support, which is mildly questionable.

    Even better, though, the proposed location for the new building is on top of this really shitty excuse for a building that looks like a few mobile homes shoved up against eachother and is generally an eyesore. In the artist's rendering of the plans, it apppears to be styled like many of the more nice looking new and old campus buildings (Green roof, light colored brick, etc) which is definitely a good thing. CMU has some pretty buildings, but it also has some impressive eyesores. Good to see one of them go away.

    Also consider that Microsoft is the #1 employer of CS grads from CMU. This school's students and expertise have served him well, so I'm glad to see that he's willing to give something back.

    1. Re:$20M but... by crimson30 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Also consider that Microsoft is the #1 employer of CS grads from CMU. This school's students and expertise have served him well

      So maybe his half-ass donation is what he thought they deserve for the half-ass OS they've cranked out.

  23. Originally... by xeon4life · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I was looking into going to CMU for their esteemed Computer Science program, but now I just hope they wont let this influence their set of courses, breadth of experience, or heterogeneous computer labs...

    --
    Real programmers can write assembly code in any language. -- Larry Wall
  24. In related news... by Joey+Patterson · · Score: 2, Funny

    Carnegie-Mellon University officials today reported that several designs for metal keys to the new Gates Center for Computer Science, which hasn't even been built yet, were found on the Kazaa and Gnutella filesharing networks. CMU Campus Police and Microsoft are reportedly investigating the leaked keys.

  25. IBM by LuxFX · · Score: 3, Informative

    I admit, I didn't get the Blue Screen of Death reference at first. I've been using Windows 2000 since it came out, and I might have seen a BSOD once... maybe twice. It just doesn't come up anymore.

    Actually I was mostly confused at the joke at first, thinking, "Wait a minute, I thought IBM was 'Big Blue'"

    --
    Punctanym: alternate spelling of words using punctuation or numerals in place of some or all of its letters; see 'leet'
    1. Re:IBM by pfriedma · · Score: 3, Funny

      You must have never used Windows ME.

      --
      Mak'tal shree lok'tak mek'ta sa'tak Oz! - Daniel Jackson
  26. MOD PARENT DOWN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    What Slashdot thinks about Microsoft is the *ONLY* thing that matters. The TRUTH is IRRELEVANT you DIRTBAG.

    If we had a beowulf cluster of Linux donations, we could overpower Bill Gates soooo easily!

  27. so sad for bill... by Chuck+Bucket · · Score: 4, Funny

    he gives all this money to a school, but still gets the borg icon treatment on /.

    CB#

  28. Re:Beatch Please! by aeroz3 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You've got to be kidding me? I'm not spoiled. I'm not rich by any means, I am at CMU because I work my ASS off.
    I made a conscious decision in my life to work hard and stay in school because I knew what it meant for my future. So who is it that really DESERVES it more? Is it the people who are the best and the brightest and have worked their asses off to show it; the ones who will be changing the world? Or is it another 15 year old mother of 2 who thought her baby-daddy jamal had a better future as a crack dealer than he could have if he stayed in school. I love the concept that if you are capable, you should be shat upon. I hope that someday, YOU, cdtoad get to live in a world where everything is designed by this lowest common denominator you love so much. Cars? Nope. Computers, of course not! Light bulbs??? Hell no. These folks are not the ones who are driving society and innovation. I'll stick with beleiving in hard work, wise decisions, and innovation personally.

  29. Re:Beatch Please! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    WTF? The guy give 20 million, and folks get upset because it doesn't go to THEIR charity of choice. Sigh...

    This could have gone back into the Microsoft Warchest... would that have been a better option?

  30. Naysayers Unite! by Nathdot · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It appears Bill has truly acted altruistically here.

    This does not fit our general characterizations of the man.

    How can we reconcile this seeming incongruity? By adopting the following reasoning: "$20 million for a building?! People on this planet are still starving to death! The ego!"

  31. What CMU had to do to get this by linefeed0 · · Score: 4, Interesting
    CMU has put out a never-ending stream of disgusting propaganda since last February when Gates gave a "lecture" at CMU. If you don't care to RTFM, CMU's "alumni magazine" (even more of a blatant PR mill than at most schools) spends an entire article bragging about how wonderful it is for CMU to have tons of incestuous connections with Microsoft. (The message: come to CMU and work for Microsoft!)

    CMU may have quite a few good individual professors and research projects in CS, but the institution as a whole doesn't think twice about being a corporate-flak career school... from their advertising slogan "The Professional Choice" in the early '80s on (when CMU accepted a certain large donation from IBM and almost decided to make all its students buy PC's in 1982).

    Thankfully, many CMU students are still practicing some degree of creative resistance, although a penguin statue allegedly placed on the roof of the student center overnight before the Gates speech was hurriedly removed since apparently CMU values its clean public image more than its students' creativity.

    One other thing to note is that this is likely not much more than a matching grant for further increases in students' tuition, which pays for a much higher share of an education at CMU than at many peer schools.

    1. Re:What CMU had to do to get this by loraksus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm not sure what is the big deal about taking down the penguin.

      It wasn't an act to destroy the creativity of students or supress their free speech rights, it was the janitors taking down something that was put up in an act of intellectual masturbation by a bunch of college students who apparantly had too much time on their hands.

      If someone donated $20 million to your school, you'd probably go a bit out of your way to make sure they feel welcome. That includes taking down ads for / mascots of their competitors.

      --
      1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
  32. It should be sky blue... by wrinkledshirt · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...that way, maybe it won't be the only thing Bill's given us that makes things crash.

    --

    --------
    Bleah! Heh heh heh... BLEAH BLEAH!!! Ha ha ha ha...

  33. Give the man a break by McBeer · · Score: 5, Informative
    I notice that Gates is getting flamed despite his many charities. As much as many of you disagree with Microsofts operating policy, Bill Gates alone has given:

    $1 billion over 20 years to establish the Gates Millennium Scholarship Program, which will support promising minority students through college and some kinds of graduate school.

    $750 million over five years to the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization, which includes the World Health Organization, the Rockefeller Foundation, Unicef, pharmaceutical companies and the World Bank.

    $350 million over three years to teachers, administrators, school districts and schools to improve America's K-12 education, starting in Washington State.

    $200 million to the Gates Library Program, which is wiring public libraries in America's poorest communities in an effort to close the "digital divide."

    $100 million to the Gates Children's Vaccine Program, which will accelerate delivery of lifesaving vaccines to children in the poorest countries of the world.

    $50 million to the Maternal Mortality Reduction Program, run by the Columbia University School of Public Health.

    $50 million to the Malaria Vaccine Initiative, to conduct research on promising candidates for a malaria vaccine.

    $50 million to an international group called the Alliance for the Prevention of Cervical Cancer.

    $50 million to a fund for global polio eradication, led by the World Health Organization, Unicef, Rotary International and the U.N. Foundation.

    $40 million to the International Vaccine Institute, a research program based in Seoul, South Korea.

    $28 million to Unicef for the elimination of maternal and neonatal tetanus.

    $25 million to the Sequella Global Tuberculosis Foundation.

    $25 million to the International AIDS Vaccine Initiative, which is creating coalitions of research scientists, pharmaceutical companies and governments in developing countries to look for a safe, effective, widely accessible vaccine against AIDS.
    Source: New York Times
    And all this was of the year 2000. Now I have not checked this, but I suspect the charitable donations from every Linux distro CEO combined would fall well short of this. Admit it, Bill Gates is in fact doing some good in this world.

    --
    Hikery.net - The best hiking site ever. Made by yours truly.
    1. Re:Give the man a break by TeknoHog · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Giving away money doesn't make you better if it comes from illegal or otherwise immoral activities.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    2. Re:Give the man a break by buchalka · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It does if your a kid dying of malaria in a third world country you moron (yes bill spends millions helping kids like this).

      I suppose if you were sure a kid you would say "no can't accept your life saving gift, let me die".

      Yeah right, sure you would.

      Not that I agree with what your saying about it being illegal anyway.

      Essentially sir, you are full of it.

      --
      Games Programmer And Designer
    3. Re:Give the man a break by Mskpath3 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Unbelievable. People like you really live in a world of fantasy. 'illegal and immoral'? Do you really have this image of Bill Gates with a monocle, a tophat, and a cigar maniacally laughing and amusing himself with the cries of the poor? It's bizarre, detached-from-reality viewpoints such as yours that will keep honest, rational reform from ever happening.

    4. Re:Give the man a break by killjoe · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So he is giving a tiny percentage of the money he made using the most slimy and despicable methods known to mankind. I'm not impressed and I suspect his maker will not be either.

      If a drug dealer game money to local schools would he be a saint? While we are at it Osama Bin Laden built lots of orphanages and schools too.

      "Now I have not checked this, but I suspect the charitable donations from every Linux distro CEO combined would fall well short of this."

      In terms of absolute dollars yes, in terms of percentages I bet they gave more.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    5. Re:Give the man a break by Bull999999 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm not a Gates fan but him donating money, even for PR reasons, helps more than a bunch of geeks who bitches that more needs to be done for the poor, yet blows all their discretionary on toys.

      --
      1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d
    6. Re:Give the man a break by Fringex · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Bill Gates has given a load of cash away in one year. That is alot of money. More importantly he gave it to organizations that save peoples lives not to plant foundations or animal rights groups. The money he has given has saved probably thousands of lives. Regardless of how you feel about his business tactics, his history is far more saintly than any drug dealer is mentioned in replies. You cannot compare how he runs a business to an individual who deliberately gives people chemicals that literally destroy both mind and body. I am not saying I am thrilled about how he has run Microsoft from beginning to present, but what he has done is far less evil than the compared scum of the earth. Think how you want, but it is a twisted reality. I commend the man for what he has given, because he didn't have too. No one twisted his arm. Taxes are a flash in the pan compared to his billions. For once can't someone who is anti-microsoft just clap you hands for some good they do.

    7. Re:Give the man a break by scot4875 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Many of these have been dealt with sufficiently already, but I'll respond to them on a point-by-point basis:

      Gates Millennium Scholarship Program

      To train more potential Microsoft employees! Obviously!

      Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization

      Only an attempt to keep people alive so that they can buy more Microsoft software!

      teachers, administrators, school districts and schools

      To obligate them to push a Microsoft curriculum and keep Apple and Linux out of the classroom!

      Gates Library Program

      Do they have any non-Microsoft Press books at these libraries? Probably not!

      Children's Vaccine Program, Maternal Mortality Reduction Program, Malaria Vaccine Initiative, Alliance for the Prevention of Cervical Cancer, global polio eradication, International Vaccine Institute, elimination of maternal and neonatal tetanus, Sequella Global Tuberculosis Foundation, International AIDS Vaccine Initiative

      Again, keep the potential customers alive! This is one of the cornerstones of capitalism -- ever expanding markets!

      The guy is obviously evil. That you can't see the motives behind these dubious donations just goes to show how easy it is to buy people's favor!

      Bill Gate$ is teh eviL!!1!!!1! OMGOMG!!

      --Jeremy

      --
      Jesus was a liberal
    8. Re:Give the man a break by CGP314 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Might I direct you here: Bill Gates: Killing Africans for Profit and P.R., by Greg Palast

      The short summary is he cost them more because of IP laws than he gave back.

      -Colin

    9. Re:Give the man a break by SilentChris · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "So he is giving a tiny percentage of the money he made using the most slimy and despicable methods known to mankind."

      Uh, I'd put drug dealing and stringing my enemies up by their balls (physically, not a metaphor) as the most despicable methods known to mankind.

      Gates is a businessman. A total pain in the ass, but still a businessman. I could see if the guy truly did immoral stuff (like kill thousands of people) to get his money, but he just ran a (monopolistic) business. You have an incredible crude sense of proportion.

    10. Re:Give the man a break by LaCosaNostradamus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      All good info, but -- and please correct me if I'm wrong -- people with enough money (to afford the setup and maintenance fees) like to use things like "foundations" to handle all their subsequent finances in order to avoid taxation. The donations are the price to be paid to have such a significant tax shelter (i.e. they have to give some money away in order for the foundation to justify existing as a charity).

      With a foundation, Bill and Melinda can take in income or capital gains, and pay essentially no tax on them -- making a mockery of the tax system imposed on the middle class. Those two people may have charitable urges like most folks do, and a foundation certainly would be helpful if only for a logo and a "non-personal" checking account, but the untold hundreds of millions in tax breaks are the real reasons that they paid some accounting firm to setup their foundation.

      If you're curious about how extreme tax breaks are getting, go read David Cay Johnston's new book "Perfectly Legal".

      --
      [You have a stable society when some nut guns down a schoolyard and the law doesn't change.]
  34. one more CS dept gets a Gates building.... by keshto · · Score: 2, Informative
    If you think CMU sold out by letting Gates give money, you are mistaken. Gates has been a major giver for many of the major new CS Dept buildings in many campuses. And no, there are usually no strings attached from Bill Gates. Here's the current list, AFAIR:
    • Stanford CS: Gates Bldg
    • MIT EECS: (half only) Gates Tower in the Stata Center (Bldg 32). The brand spanking new Gehry building
    • Harvard CS: Maxwell Dworkin. Harvard has a standing policy of not naming buildings after living people and Bill Gates usually wants his dad's name at the doorside. So they instead put the maiden names of Gates' and Balmer's moms on the building
    Berkeley's Soda Hall, their current CS abode, is probably too old. I won't be surprised if they too got a CS building named Gates Hall.
    Of the other univs in the top-10, UIUC has the Seibel Center. Dunno about Princeton, UTexas, Cornell and the others...
  35. In acknowledgment of Mr. Gates' profound influence by currivan · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...on the computer software industry, it should have robust barriers to entry.

  36. Times have changed by TequilaJunction · · Score: 4, Interesting

    When I went to CMU (back in the days before the WWW) the new technology on campus was by by Apple. Our computer clusters (which were called Apple Orchards - sigh) were about 50% Apple, 20% Unix, and 30% Microsoft. There was a big NeXT following in the very early days as well. I guess we're not going to see a push for alternative OS's there in the near future. As a side note, one more new building on that campus isn't going to make much of a difference. It's looked wrong ever since they tore down Skibo.

  37. Give Bill a Break by buchalka · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I can't stand people who bash Bill and his foundation. Sure bash Microsoft if you must, but why the foundation?

    Yes he is mega rich but he still doesn't have to give the money away does he?

    I am sure he could find other ways to get rid of the money. Instead he is doing some good.

    His foundation has practically wiped our Malaria in third world countries.

    I suppose he did that for advertising as well??

    No I am not a MS support, Linux is my vehicle of choice, but I am man enough to applaud someone doing good for the community.

    Would be nice if some of the wallies posted here could do the same.

    Yeah I know, fat chance of that.

    --
    Games Programmer And Designer
  38. Re:XP BSOD == Cold Reboot by bob65 · · Score: 2, Informative
    If the above is true, Microsoft has executed a brilliant act of market deception, even against highly technical users.

    Yes it is true. There is a checkbox in system settings under the System Failure section that says "Automatically restart". It is checked by default.

  39. Screw You Mr.Gates by tron21 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I am a student at CMU, we knew about this yesterday. They announced it by handing out fliers with a drawing of the new building on it. Well it turns out that the building and the Society of Automotive Engineers http://www.andrew.cmu.edu/org/sae/ garage seem to occupy the same space. Hum, I wonder what is going to happen to our garage. Dear Mr.Gates, do you think you could spare an extra $30,000 to help build something other then more computer clusters on our campus?

  40. Generosity, or just PR? by symbolic · · Score: 3, Interesting


    I say PR. If it were an act of generosity, Gates would have encouraged them to come up with a more creative name. Nothing like the ego of someone with too much money, too much power, or just a delusional state of having either.

  41. Rude? by mrscott · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I totally agree. In fact, it was downright despicable to give the campus only $20 MILLION dollars out of the $50 million needed to actually complete the structure. He should just go back to campus, apologize for his rudeness, rip up the check he gave to the college and go home and write a letter of apology for his rudeness.

    Who cares if he's really rich? If he gave away $20 million every day, he wouldn't be for very long, would he? No matter how you look at it, $20 million is a LOT of money.

    I am sometimes absolutely appalled by the unappreciative nature of some people.

    1. Re:Rude? by cosmol · · Score: 4, Informative
      If he gave away $20 million every day, he wouldn't be for very long, would he?

      Depends if you think 5.5 years is very long

    2. Re:Rude? by morganjharvey · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But this money isn't from Bill Gates himself -- it's from the Bill and Melinda Foundation. While I'm sure that Billy there gives them quite a chunk of coin every so often, that money is often invested and allowed to expand. I guess the true question would be how much money does the foundation have?

      I think that the foundation has done a lot of things that are absolutely great (I'm told my local YWCA wrote a letter asking for assistance in building a new wing and remodelling and received a very sizeable check very shortly afterwards, very few questions asked) and I don't know why anybody would grouse about genuine philanthropy. It's very hard to say that he set up the foundation to create some sort of tax loophole given the fact that he has told the press (right about the time of Bush's tax cuts...) that he thinks the rich should pay _more_ in taxes (too lazy to look up a link -- do it yourself). The man literally has so much money that he doesn't know what to do with it. I'd rather that it comes out in the form of donations than being holed up in some bank account somewhere.

      And plus, if this were a marketing ploy, why not just have Microsoft donate the money?

      Just my two cents...
      -mo

  42. Microsoft Skynet has become self-aware by Gary+Destruction · · Score: 2, Funny

    Skynet was after all created at CMU. Now Microsoft is giving money to CMU. Will Terminators have glowing blue eyes instead of glowing red eyes?

  43. Well of COURSE bright blue.... by reynolds_john · · Score: 2, Funny

    It represents the Blue Screen of Death.

  44. Every School Needs a Gates Building by ortcutt · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It's about time that CMU got a Gates building. Stanford has had one for a while. It doesn't seem that the name is having any inappropriate effect on the students, faculty or administration here, though. The CS curriculum only has one Windows programming course (an elective) and most of the computers in the labs are either Macs or Suns. Even many of the staff use Macs here.

  45. IBM by corian · · Score: 3, Informative

    Someone at Slashdot is very confused. IBM is "Big Blue", not Microsoft.

  46. Re:XP BSOD == Cold Reboot by sparkz · · Score: 4, Informative

    If that's UNIX FUD, it's a very strange form of it, as UNIX has many intentional forced-reboots.

    The more Highly-Available you get, the more forced-reboot paths you get. Counterintuitive? Look at SunCluster. When it detects a condition which could, even only theoretically, cause data corruption, any potentially-dangerous node will deliberately PANIC itself.
    Take a simple 2-node cluster, with storage shared between them. When everything's running smoothly, they can both write to the shared storage. If the interconnect between them dies, then neither node can know the state of the other node. Both race to put a SCSI reserve on the quorum device (the SCSI protocol ensures that only one can succeed) - any nodes which fail to get their SCSI reserve on the quorum device will kill themselves the fastest way possible - the "failfast" driver.
    It might turn out that it would have been safe for them to stay around and shut down cleanly, but with mission-critical data, it is not worth taking the risk - don't even pause to work out if it's safe - those microseconds could trash the database.

    UNIX is perfectly happy to accept the possibility of unknown bugs, and take responsibility for them in advance, as well as for external hardware faults. If a reboot may be needed, it's better to lose uptime than to lose data.
    And, of course, uptime is something in which UNIX excels, so it's not even much of a compromise.

    FWIW, I believe that Windows clustering has a similar quorum model, although the Windows view of clustering appears to be rather more conservative.

    --
    Author, Shell Scripting : Expert Re
  47. sponsor for each classroom by ArcticCelt · · Score: 3, Interesting
    In any case, as long as you have a shiny nice new building on Bill's dime, who gives a crap what it is called?

    In Montreal one of our finest Commerce Universities (HEC), when they built a complete new campus they decided to sponsor each classroom and put the name of the sponsor on the front door of each classroom. Its ok when your finance classroom is named after a bank, but one classroom was named after a chicken fast-food chain and their was a little bit less of glamour in the name of that class. :)

    Anyway they had an insanely great new campus for less money and who cares about the names?

    --

    Yahh, hiii haaaaa! -Major Kong, from Dr. Strangelove
    1. Re:sponsor for each classroom by Have+Blue · · Score: 2, Funny

      If the finance room was named after a bank, was the room named after fast food for liberal arts?

  48. What's $20m when you are worth $61 Billion by NicksMyName · · Score: 3, Informative
    According to This website's Wealth Clock Bill Gates is worth $61 Billion.

    Bill spending $20 million to get his name on a building is like someone with $500k of wealth spending $164.

    So next time you buy a Games Console for your nephew stick your name on it to show everyone how generous you've been.

    (And if it's an XBOX you're helping a very small amount to pay for another University building)

  49. I wonder what KGB will do... by FleaPlus · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I can't help but wonder what CMU's KGB organization will do when this building goes up. Basically, KGB is an on-campus group which engages in all sorts of random silliness, and describes itself as "an eccentric bunch of nerds, geeks, freaks, visionaries, outcasts and ne'er-do-wells, who plan on being on the right side of the guns when the Revolution comes."

    When Bill Gates came to visit campus earlier this year, the group painted the Fence (a frequently painted object in the middle of campus) bright blue in his honor. Also, during the Q&A session of the talk, KGB's president Ed asked the following:

    (transcribed from rough memory)
    Ed: Hello Bill. Have you ever used Linux?
    Bill: Yeah, a few times.
    Ed: Would you accept my gift of Linux? [holds up Linux CD]
    (chuckles and applause from audience)
    Bill: What's it worth? (grins)
    (more chuckles and applause from audience)
    Bill: Sure.
    (Ed gives Bill Linux CD)

  50. Architecturally speaking... by r_j_prahad · · Score: 2, Funny

    There won't be a front entryway to the building. But there will be hundreds of back doors.

  51. Re:Oh come ON! by javiercero · · Score: 3, Insightful

    A lot of drug king pins in Colombia do a helluva charitable work actually, some are almost revered as heros. If you ignore how they got the money to begin with, then yeah... they are great people. It is how they got the money they are using to do charitable work that is the issue.

  52. obligatory simpsons... by isaac338 · · Score: 3, Funny

    4. All wall decorations are essential and directly integrated into the building and cannot be removed without destroying the entire structure

    "I wouldn't do that, that's a load bearing poster.."

  53. Re:Beatch Please! by TheFlyingGoat · · Score: 3, Informative

    I was going to moderate you as flamebait or overrated since I have mod points, but I felt it more important to actually state how your point is so wrong.

    The Bill Gates Foundation donated $10 million to Milwaukee Public Schools this year, in order to help them with their plan of breaking up the large schools and creating smaller ones. The money has facilitated this and the inner city students are already showing increased grades and scores on their standardized tests.

    Without the money, the switch would have taken close to a decade. With the money it will take 2-3 years. His foundation has donated to MANY good causes like this, so who the fuck cares if he gives additional money to CMU?

    You come across as a complete idiot on this one. Gates may be a ruthless businessman with illegal business practices, but his charitable giving is above and beyond what every other billionaire gives.

    --
    You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life. --Winston Churchill
  54. Not Wiping Out Malaria by DoubleReed · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you read the link you put there, he has given a bunch of money to RESEARCH towards a malaria vaccine.
    Just to point out wiping out Malaria would be HUGE HUGE, every anthro professor I've had who did work in S America had it.
    So just ya, Gates has wiped out Malaria as much as Reeve has wiped out paralysis.

  55. Just wait for SCO to get into this... by xenobyte · · Score: 2, Funny

    They'll buy an old building already on campus, slap a bit of paint and window dressing on it, then fence it in with a high electric fence and charge a massive fee just to look at the building (let alone using it). Then they proceed to send a bill to all the people using all the other buildings, claiming they own the concept of a building and that their buildings are based on methods found in SCO's building...

    Sure, SCO's building and all the other buildings are based on far older principles and methods, but still they insist on owning the concepts because they were in the building they bought and thus it is theirs forever.....

    --
    "For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong." -- H.L. Mencken (1880-1956) --
  56. you want crazy.. you GOT crazy by Suchetha · · Score: 2, Informative

    this article on autoweek from a little over a year ago (almost to the day) talks about how bill gates and other rich folkses fought to get the porsche 959 made street legal. obviously this would have cost a tad more than a bunch of segways

    Suchetha

    --

    learn from yesterday, plan for tomorrow, party tonight
    or one out of three ain't bad
  57. My first postive thing on BG on /. by Qbertino · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I actually like his new haircut. Now if only he would finally notice that he can't beat OSS and therefore join the bandwagon, so that I need not talk my mouth fuzzy with convincing my customers to use Linux I'd be cool with the man.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
  58. Re:What the hell? by The+MESMERIC · · Score: 2, Insightful

    dont be naive or stupid
    I remember the time when Mr Billy was the only mega-corp billionaire that never donated a thing to charity.
    I kept repeating that again and again in forums. Then maybe their marketting team listened. And then started first donating Winblows "software" to school (great marketting).
    MS software is ludicrously expensive to purchase in the 3rd world. No wonder they are all going linux.
    And donating money to America's AIDS research. Wow how generous. AIDS treatment drugs are too ridiculously expensive to the 3rd world - despite being cheap to produce. Let's put a price on death shall we? So no wonder countries like Brazil are producing cheaper clones (instead of $99 per pill you have $0.99!).
    So don't be such down right thick, there are people who are rich and succesfull philantropist - who don't get villified as such.
    If someone is shady - the truth will show. Come on we live in the 21sth century. All false heroes will be exposed.

    For me naivity of people the worse evil of all. It made Hitler powerful.

  59. Re:XP BSOD == Cold Reboot by Sage+Gaspar · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I don't know if this is necessarily a deceptive move or not (I think it might have been just to keep people from going crazy when "fatal error" or something popped up), but I can confirm that my OEM XP CD as of last month and a Win 2000 version from last year or so both came with a "Reboot upon system error" option checked.

    Removing it involved delving into the registry in 2000, but there's a simple checkbox in XP.

    Either way, it was a royal pain the first time I discovered this "feature" when my Win2K box got a virus and began crashing on boot to windows, thus ending up in an infinite reboot cycle with no real way of understanding what was happening. It took me a while just to get it to stop rebooting, and THEN I had to repair the virus.

  60. MS changing the culture by ajkst1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I don't think this donation will change the culture towards Microsoft at CMU at all. As has already been mentioned, there are a TON of CMU grads that work at Microsoft. CMU grads know Microsoft wants them and many of them do go to work for them. Avie Tevanian, CTO for Apple, is a CMU grad and has done great things with them. CMU is a Linux and open source hotbed. "The Microsoft Way" is the last thing many of them want to learn. This [apple.com, QTVR required] is an example of why CMU isn't going to all of sudden jump to "The Microsoft Way." They have a significant interest in UNIX and Apple, and that's been there since 1983.

    I went to Carnegie Mellon 2 years ago for a seminar on integrating OS X into a college campus. I got to take a tour of the lab pictured in the link and imagined the 120 PCs and CRT monitors in there and it wasn't a pretty sight. The 15" iMacs they replaced them with are much nicer in terms of size and flow in the room, especially when the room is full. It's a nice donation by Bill, so don't take it as his way of converting CMU to Microsoft. Of all the schools in the world, CMU would probably be one of the last to go.

  61. Cambridge, not Massachusetts by tezza · · Score: 2, Interesting
    In Cambridge they have a William H Gates Building.

    I have a mate doing his PhD in Comp. Sci up there, and he says a lot of the staff in there are militant Linux advocates. They relish the irony.

    --
    [% slash_sig_val.text %]
  62. He'll Get It Back.... by geordie_loz · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Most of the money will go on the Windows licenses, so Microsoft will get the money back soon enough.

    This sort of circular stuff could be a good way to launder money ;).

  63. huh?! by Simon · · Score: 2, Insightful
    2. Gates and Microsoft, as much as people don't want to admit, drove the PC into the mainstream use for end-user consumers. Microsoft followed others such as DEC, Sun, etc., and had something that ran on hardware of the day for academic and commercial reasons, and then took a leap (albeit Apple was already there in small representation, and Xerox just didn't market their workstation as effectively as MS did), and voila! They made a new market of people who found the usefulness of a computer at home.
    oh! come on! I'm not quite 30 and I can still remember the 80s well enough to know that that is not how it happened. IBM, the clone manufacturers and applications like Lotus 1-2-3 and WordPerfect are what drove the success of the PC in the 80s, it certainly wasn't MSDOS. Even in the 90s we see that WWW, email and the internet pushed the PC even further into the mainstream. It is IBM's orignal screw up with the licensing of MSDOS that bootstrapped Microsoft's rise to where it is now.

    --
    Simon

    1. Re:huh?! by Simon · · Score: 2, Interesting
      to think Lotus and Wordperfect drove the success is misguided at best. As the parent poster suggested it was MSDOS and its ease of use and simple design that allowed programs like Lotus and wordperfect to work

      :-) MSDOS didn't have any "ease of use". Programs like Lotus and WordPerfect were loaded into memory by MSDOS after which point they received little support from MSDOS as an operating system, especially in comparision to the OSes at the time such as AmigaOS and the Mac. "simple design"!? MSDOS was/is a mess.

      As for PCs as a gaming platform. The PC was always seen and marketed as the "serious business computer" in the 80s. DOS games were absolute crap in comparision to the competion then. It wasn't until the early 90s that the PC started to emerge as the primary home gaming platform.

      --
      Simon

  64. Apple ][ and VisiCalc by SgtChaireBourne · · Score: 2, Insightful
    If anything, Gates drove a company that...
    Bill Gates certainly has a large fan base among some subcultures, and has rightly earned a reputation as a clever (and perhaps unscrupulous) business man. However, let's not get into creating revisionist versions of history.

    Apple ][ plus VisiCalc and, later, IBM plus Lotus 1-2-3 got microcomputers onto every desktop.

    Personally I would find it appropriate for a business school to have a Gates building, but as much damage as Bill has done to the entire computing industry and even computing science, I'd have to say the name of the building is entirely inappropriate. He and his company have caused (and are still causing) far too much damage to computer science and to the economy.

    Better to name it after someone or something else. What's next the Osama Bin Laden building for Womens Studies?

    --
    Beta is broken and the link to classic doesn't work. Stop wasting our time or there won't be anybody left here.
  65. CMU and MSFT's relationship by 0x0d0a · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Microsoft recruits like mad at CMU (esp. for Microsoft Research) because it's a good computer science school, not because they have special ties.

    It's very true that the university administration (not the School of Computer Science administration) is big on having buddies at large businesses, at having ins in the defense world, stuff like that, to help suck in grant money.

    However, the School of Computer Science is quite different. SCS is very critical of Microsoft. I don't think there is a single SCS course taught on Windows or using any Microsoft products (there are a few taught using Mathematica, but generally one uses either Solaris or GNU tools, and not even proprietary products). I remember one CMU philosophy course (a Humanities and Social Science class, not even SCS) where the professor handed out a document in .DOC format and the next day came in, apologized to everyone due to all the complaints, and asked whether we'd prefer PDF, PS, RTF, etc instead. You could theoretically get by using Microsoft Office, I guess, but there's quite a bit of pressure to use LaTeX in SCS. My databases class focused on Postgres, because you could recode parts of the scheduler (unlike, say, MS SQL), which was important for teaching DBMS internal theory. I remember when one SCS professor, Gregory Kesden (damn cool guy, BTW), asked some Microsoft guy to come give a lecture on the .NET framework in a university lecture hall, and got absolutely chewed out by the SCS administration for doing so, who viewed this as promoting a Microsoft product.

    If CMU has ties to any company, it's Apple. Apple's OS X kernel was written at CMU, CMU uses a ton of Macs -- probably about as many Windows machines, down from a majority of Macs at one point, and Apple people come to speak more often than Microsoft people.

    CMU maintains their own Linux distribution (Andrew Linux) and develops and has developed a phenomenal amount of open source software, including major packages. CMU's done a lot of the OSS SNMP code out there, AFS is from CMU, festival (the OSS speech synth package) is from Alan Black at CMU, Coda is from CMU, and so forth.

    CMU has an absolutely ridiculous degree of interaction with Slashdot just because of all the *IX geeks at CMU. I attended CMU's SCS and knew a single Windows guy -- did work on Windows, liked Windows, etc. Not common.

    I agree that the SCS people probably won't like having a building on campus called the Bill Gates building -- Bill Gates is not particularly well-known for advancing the field of computer science, and a number of people feel that he's tended to hold it back in the name of profit. The university people, though, who are responsible for finding offices and lecture rooms for the SCS people, are probably thrilled.

    Of all the major CS universities that I visited when deciding on a university, CMU was the *only* done that didn't rattle off a list of "the places that you can get a job" or push their job-placement services. The assumption was that you were coming because you liked/were interested in research, not because you wanted job placement. That was a major turn-on for me.

    Point is, CMU isn't likely to be much of an MS school any time soon.

  66. ObNit: not named for Leland Stanford by edremy · · Score: 2, Informative
    It's named for Leland Stanford *Jr*, his son who died (of TB?) at a young age.

    Look at the seal sometime: it's Leland Stanford Junior University. As a Stanford grad school alum, I always get a kick out of that- I got my doctorate from a junior college!

    --
    "Seven Deadly Sins? I thought it was a to-do list!"
  67. Water Proplems in Gates Building by Prince+Vegeta+SSJ4 · · Score: 2, Funny
    You guys/gals missed the obvious problem here. Certainly there will be tremendous water problems in this building.

    Several leaks will appear in the roof, which will require a never ending number of *patches*. However, these patches will then cause an ever increasing static load on the roof, requiring removal of certain Fixtures in the building. These fixtures in the building must be removed because the building can no longer *support* them.

    Next, due to all of the leaks and subsequent rise in relative humidity inside the building, mold will form at an astounding rate, spreading to other buildings. Then, one of the biology students in attemp to 'help', will introduce a mold *VIRUS* which will spread like wildfire to all of the *buildings* on campus