Slashdot Mirror


More Exploding Cellphones In The News

adityapandey writes "It's happened again. Yahoo News has another story on exploding cellphones. Most of these mishaps are blamed on counterfeit batteries and chargers. Recently, Kyocera recalled about 40,000 cellphones for free replacement, because of batteries overheating and venting superheated gases. Yet, cellphone makers claim that such incidents are too rare to care about. Shouldn't cellphone companies be making people aware of the hazards of usage?"

328 comments

  1. answer in short by koi88 · · Score: 0


    Shouldn't cellphone companies be making people aware of the hazards of usage?"

    Yes.

    --

    I don't need a signature.
    1. Re:answer in short by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      And they do, they're in the big thick manuals that come with phones that no one thinks they need to read.

    2. Re:answer in short by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do believe they label the batteries, as that and when they get warm it happends. If ID10t Errors occured less frequently. Maybe this wouldn't be so much of an issue. I mean. If my phone gets hot I'll stop using it. Just like my laptop will burn my balls if I leave it on my lap to much. How stupid are people these days?

      And yes, if it's defective then recall the dam things.

    3. Re:answer in short by vespazzari · · Score: 5, Funny

      we should probably have warnings on powder blue crayons too. cause god know how bad it is when one of those gets jammed up your nose and i know from experience that this happens all the time same with screwdrivers and pencils and pens, and come to think of it every other pointy object, they dont have warnings- it must be ok. There comes a point when people stop paying attention to warnings because they already know that they know better, which is often the case- the problem with this is that more often than not, truly important warnings get glossed over becuase they are assumed to be the regular "do not light on fire", "not to be taken internally", etc... ... extended warranty, how can i lose!

      --
      "Alcohol, cause of, and solution to, all of life's problems" -Homer Simpson
    4. Re:answer in short by kfg · · Score: 2, Funny

      Dude, you've got a 20 gallon high explosive device sitting in your parking space, right now!

      You're lucky just to be alive, and the bomb squad will be over in minutes to contain and confiscate it. We hope you drive a Porsche.

      KFG

    5. Re:answer in short by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 4, Funny

      Oh yeah, the guys with the bandannas and the slimjim are members of bomb squad. They will also need to examine your radio for radiation output, and take your tires back to the lab for testing.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    6. Re:answer in short by Phisbut · · Score: 4, Insightful
      we should probably have warnings on powder blue crayons too. cause god know how bad it is when one of those gets jammed up your nose

      Common sense (although many consumers lack it) lets you know that jamming a crayon up your nose is asking for trouble. However, even with common sense, you wouldn't expect a cell phone to explode. You bought a tool that lets you speak with people from far away, not a stick of dynamite.

      Consumers are indeed jaded enough by the warnings of "do not cram this up your butt" and the like, and since most of these stupid warnings are for inappropriate use of the object, they shouldn't even be there. There should be a law against plain stupidity, and lawsuits because "the manual didn't say I shouldn't jump out the window with this pillow" should never deserve to be heard... only in America can the stupid hope for a better life.

      Now, when the hazard comes from regular use of the item, like... talking on your cell phone, well if said phone can explode, or "vent superheated gases" on me, I think I would like to know.

      --
      After 3 days without programming, life becomes meaningless
      - The Tao of Programming
    7. Re:answer in short by TheKidWho · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The odds are 100million to one that your cell phone will explode, you think people will care about those odds?

    8. Re:answer in short by Nikker · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Shouldn't cellphone companies be making people aware of the hazards of usage?

      I used to work for a phone company that did a recall on the Kyocera 7135 (apparently no exhaust was installed on the battery).

      All I can say is that under your contract they wipe themselves clean of *evreything* that could possibly happen and it is then the responsibility of the user. If you ever try to make a case other wise they will refer you to your contract, store you bought it from (or likely in this case undertaker) and tell you to shove it or go though mazes of 'pass the buck'.

      Trust me (or check *your* contract) they cover their ass nice and clean. Of course most companies will put on a good public face and say even though its not our shit we will be happy to tell you all how to shovel it.

      --
      A loop, by its nature, continues. If that didn't make sense, start reading this sentence again.
    9. Re:answer in short by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      What did you say motherfucker? We with the bomb squad nigga, now step off before I show you just how bomb we are. Unless maybe you want to examine the front side of my gatt? Because thats all the bomb I need.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    10. Re:answer in short by AxB_teeth · · Score: 1

      > Consumers are indeed jaded enough by the warnings of "do not cram this up your butt"

      Though those warnings are oddly applicable when cell phones are concerned.

      Yes, as a matter of fact I do feel shame for linking there.

      --

      However,
    11. Re:answer in short by kfg · · Score: 1

      . . .and take your tires back to the lab for testing.

      Hey, it's easy enough to claim tires are Y rated, but I believe in empirical verification.

      I think I'll call my lawyer first this time though so I get to sleep at home tonight.

      KFG

    12. Re:answer in short by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just wait until airport security hears about it.

    13. Re:answer in short by SenseiLeNoir · · Score: 2, Informative

      A BIG notice on all phones here in the UK say "Use of non original Batteries can cause damage or fire".

      Yet most people turn around and say the words "lock in" and buy cheap of the back of the lorry specials, and wonder why they have problems.

      Mobile phone batteries are not simple. The cells can release flamable gas if not used properly, and if overcharged can cause leakage, or damage.

      It is unreasonable to accuse the Phone Manufacturers for faulty third party products, when they clearly warn against their usage.

      Some manufacturers like Ericsson go one step futher.

      Ericsson incorporate a special curicuitry that if the battery is not original or licensed, it would use a much lower power to charge the battery, to avoid overheating due to sub par components.

      and for those who argue about Lock In, I have a T68 phone which still uses its original battery. My frined who poo pooed the disclaimer bought third party batteries and is has had to replace the batteries 3 times.

      Secondly, All ericsson batteries have a temperature sensor built in. The phoen can monitor the temperature of the battery and cut power shoudl anything dodgy be happening. Anyone who has a Ericsson phone (T68/T610/T630 except the Pxxx series) can test this by getting the Float Mobile Agent software and linking to the phone, where you will be able to read the temperature of the battery as well as the phone.

      Point being, manufacturers have done all they can to limit the issues with this, and cellphones are still relatively safe.

      --
      Have a nice day!
    14. Re:answer in short by goatan · · Score: 1
      we should probably have warnings on powder blue crayons too. cause god know how bad it is when one of those gets jammed up your nose and i know from experience that this happens all the time same with screwdrivers and pencils and pens, and come to think of it every other pointy object, they dont have warnings- it must be ok. There comes a point when people stop paying attention to warnings because they already know that they know better, which is often the case- the problem with this is that more often than not, truly important warnings get glossed over becuase they are assumed to be the regular "do not light on fire", "not to be taken internally", etc... ... extended warranty, how can i lose!

      Those are all obvious. do you think that it's obviouse your cell phone could explode?

      It's true you can't help some people no matter what you do, but does that meen the more inteligent members of society who do read warnings should potentially suffer for the others stupidity.

      I don't get why they don't want to put a warning on. Usually companies put the stupidest of warnings on just to make sure they can't be sued for not warning people.

      --
      Saying Apple is better than MS is like saying Botulism is better than rabies.

    15. Re:answer in short by BadMrMojo · · Score: 1

      we should probably have warnings on powder blue crayons too. cause god know how bad it is when one of those gets jammed up your nose and i know from experience that this happens all the time same with screwdrivers and pencils and pens, and come to think of it every other pointy object, they dont have warnings- it must be ok.

      IANAL, but my wife does happen to be in law school... and as such I do pick up a bit from her daily decompressions.

      Cases such as the tragic crayon incident are considered from the perspective of a hypothetical "reasonable person." While the two sides may argue about the definition of a reasonable person, I think that you'd be hard-pressed to make a case that shoving a crayon up your nose is a reasonable use of said crayon.

    16. Re:answer in short by eric2hill · · Score: 1

      I couldn't agree more. What we need is a new law similar to aggravated battery, but for stupid people. We can call it aggravated stupidity! You can get a citation for just being stupid - driving stupid, getting hurt doing stupid things, acting stupid, etc. The fines would start low and get progressively higher the more stupid you are until you are either broke or learn.

      I should run for congress. Then I'd have the money to pay my tickets :)

      --
      LOAD "SIG",8,1
      LOADING...
      READY.
      RUN
    17. Re:answer in short by mmkkbb · · Score: 1

      cellphones do not have flared bases, and can thus be lost inside like poor lemmiwinks

      --
      -mkb
    18. Re:answer in short by mrseigen · · Score: 1

      Damn. It's Windows-only, I was hoping I'd get to play with more features of my brand-new T610 than Salling Clicker and the Bluetooth agent will provide under OS X.

    19. Re:answer in short by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How stupid are people these days?

      Judging from the spelling and grammar in your post, they're pretty fucking stupid.

    20. Re:answer in short by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      we should probably have warnings on powder blue crayons too. cause god know how bad it is when one of those gets jammed up your nose

      Not always. Homer Simpson prefers it up his nose.

    21. Re:answer in short by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know about the US, but in the UK, a company can't exclude liability for injuries caused by correct use of their products, no matter what they try to say.

    22. Re:answer in short by SenseiLeNoir · · Score: 1

      Yes, FMA is windows only....
      Ok its GPL too, but being compiled on Borland Delphi.. well shoudl i say more.

      But it is definately a nice peice of software, and its rather intresting what you can do with it!

      --
      Have a nice day!
    23. Re:answer in short by CrazyTiger · · Score: 1

      I see your Simpsons refrence. But you couldn't be more right.That is what Gary Larson's "The Far Side" calls Basic Stupidity.

    24. Re:answer in short by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      My friend who poo pooed the disclaimer bought third party batteries and is has had to replace the batteries 3 times.

      Of corse, he only paid $5 a pop for those replacement batteries, instead of $70 for a new battery from the manufacturer.

  2. Commercial out-take by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    The "Can you hear me now?" guy trying to talk from his neck.

    1. Re:Commercial out-take by perdu · · Score: 1
      The "Can you hear me now?" guy trying to talk from his neck.
      Hate to break it to you, but his phone is not really turned on, so I think he's pretty safe.

      --
      You only use 2% of your DNA
    2. Re:Commercial out-take by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your cellphone asplode

    3. Re:Commercial out-take by quarkscat · · Score: 1

      Exactly.

      Why bother with the tinfoil hat to guard
      against cellphone-induced brain tumors --
      now we have to worry about playing
      "Russian Roulette" with our cellphones.

      The Israeli MOSAD has (from time to time)
      used cellphones packed with C-4 explosive
      to "reach out and touch" a HAMAS terrorist.

      Now, you can be any "Joe Schmoe" and have
      an IED up against your head -- goody, just
      one more thing to have anxieties about.

  3. Well, Let's Take Advantage of It by Spencerian · · Score: 2, Funny

    Get the Department of Defense together with Verizon and para-drop a shitload of cellphones in Mosul and other Iraqi hot-spots with flyers on how the insurgents can call their friends.

    Instead, they'll be calling Allah.

    "Can we blow you up now?" "Good."

    --
    Vos teneo officium eram periculosus ut vos recipero is.
    1. Re:Well, Let's Take Advantage of It by kc0re · · Score: 1

      That's a beautiful idea! Maybe we can make some that purposefully explode? Problem is we'd have some dumb private pick one up and try and call home..

    2. Re:Well, Let's Take Advantage of It by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 0

      Reach out, reach out, and touch someone. Reach out call up and just say !$#%!#$QRTWQER^WERGAGAQ#$T^Q
      *** NO CARRIER ***

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    3. Re:Well, Let's Take Advantage of It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Yay! How about the Iraqi patriots defending their country from imperialist pigs dropped a load of booby trapped SUVs in Washington along with flyers telling the lardy inhabitants there are free hamburgers in the next state.

      Instead they'll driving home to Jesus!

      "the faster you drive the more Big Macs you get!".... Kaboom!

    4. Re:Well, Let's Take Advantage of It by msblack · · Score: 0

      I appreciate the humor of the immediate parent posting regarding SUVs and realize it was a parody of other posts. However, when did people in the USA lose their moral compass? Regarding the dropping of exploding cell phones in Iraq, my fellow countrymen take such joy in the deaths of people from a different country. As the parent clearly states, Iraqi civilians are defending their lives the only way they can. Is that wrong? When was the last time an Iraqi threatedned YOU?

      --
      signature pending slashdot approval
    5. Re:Well, Let's Take Advantage of It by bcattwoo · · Score: 1

      Isreal already used this strategy to assassinate Palestinian bombmaker Yahya Ayyash. Of course, in that case they used a cell phone intentionally rigged with explosives.

    6. Re:Well, Let's Take Advantage of It by Archangel_Azazel · · Score: 1

      about 15 years or so ago is when I started noticing something was wrong. I've got an open diary and was called a "Trator"(sic) and told to move to a different country if I didn't like what was going on in America. People have become fractured here. Either you're a gun-toting expansionist or you're a hippie traitor...there seems to be no middle ground anymore. It scares me a lot.

      (Yes, those were generalizations...deal with it.)

      --
      Your mind is like a parachute. It works best when it's been opened.
    7. Re:Well, Let's Take Advantage of It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ignoring Godwin's Law, I think that Bush is a faschist. A lot of the attidudes that prevail in this country were prevailing around the time of WWII in Germany. The major difference I see is that Germany was originally expansionist to reclaim territory lost in WWI. We're expansionist to "protect ourselves." Whenever someone uses the safety and security battlecry for all the wars we want to justify, they always seem to forget what one of our most crucial founding fathers, Ben Franklin, said about security. Namely that those who would value safety over freedom both deserve neither and shall have neither. I met someone on the bus who believes that America has the duty to intervene in all of the world's humanitarian problems. Why then are we not going into Africa and stopping Female Genital Mutilation, or any of the other crap, major rebellions and oppressive regimes down there? The awnser? Because all we really give a damn about as a country is ourselves. People bitch about supporting troups and protecting this country, but when it comes down to it they fly those banners simply to feel good about themselves and their $60,000 SUV with a built-in DVD player and all leather interior, as they drive with their 10MPG fuel economy home from a high-paying job. That's all the war in Iraq was about. Stabilizing the region one domino at a time so that we may more efficiently exploit the middle-east oil resources. Now we're fixing to go to war with Iran? Why? Forgive my outright rant, but I have serious problems with a war which we'll end up starting, and then drafting people to fight. I didnt vote for Bush. I'm ashamed of what he's doing in our country, in Iraq, and in the prison facility at Guantanamo Bay. I'm ashamed of Ashcroft hiring a team of lawyers to circumvent international law, and drafting then classifying a series of acceptable torture procedures. I think America is lame, lame like a skript kiddie.

    8. Re:Well, Let's Take Advantage of It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One address to explain it all :
      http://www.newamericancentury.com/

      You'd be shocked to see who the people are who're on the committees and also who among them are also in the Carlyle Group...

      Asmodeus

    9. Re:Well, Let's Take Advantage of It by Nogami_Saeko · · Score: 1

      Well, IMHO, you're absolutely right to be scared.

      Anyone who thinks that only the middle east has religious extremists who are willing to go to any lengths to accomplish their goals (politicial or otherwise) are fools.

      Religious extremists in north america are every bit as frightening and every bit as dangerous.

      N.

      --
      "Nothing strengthens authority so much as silence." - Charles de Gaulle
    10. Re:Well, Let's Take Advantage of It by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      ...when did people in the USA lose their moral compass?

      When Kennedy got shot. It's been all downhill since then.

      When was the last time an Iraqi threatedned YOU?

      When Mohammed Ali refused to be drafted, he stated, "No Vietnamese ever called me a nigger." To me, it's just as heroic to stand up and tell them to their face that "I won't fight your fucking war" as it was to do as you're told and go.

      The Israelis killed more than one Palestinian with an exploding cel phone. Obviously, they didn't depend on the battery. I think they filled the thing with c4(?), and called the number. When the guy answered...

      --
      What?
  4. Very Small Percentage by JPM+NICK · · Score: 5, Interesting

    170 million cell phones and 83 reports of cell phones exploding or catching fire in the past two years. 83/170,000,000 = 4.88 x 10^-7. To me, this is way within acceptable margin of error or uncontrollability. Think about how many computer power supplies have shorted out and caught fire (i have had 2 at my job in the last year, and we only have 17 computers). It is a shame, and I am sure it is painful for the people and i do feel bad, but lets not get out of hand with this.

    1. Re:Very Small Percentage by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but they banned lawn darts because a couple dozen idiot kits got hurt hurling them at each other. It's this ultra-left wing logic that "if it saves one life then it's worth it" that causes this kind of thing.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    2. Re:Very Small Percentage by Oddly_Drac · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "To me, this is way within acceptable margin of error or uncontrollability."

      Until your mom's hair catches fire.

      "It is a shame, and I am sure it is painful for the people and i do feel bad, but lets not get out of hand with this."

      Dunno where you're from, but such items come with warranties about being free from defects, and electrical items that catch fire could be considered defective. Are you this lacksadaisical about anything you buy?

      --
      Oddly Draconis
      Too cynical to live, too stubborn to die.
    3. Re:Very Small Percentage by squiggleslash · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I think in fairness, I don't generally hold my computer's power supply next to my head. Usually, even if the machine's directly next to me (or in front of me) there's quite a cushion between the power supply and my body (big hard case, optical drive, etc)

      It is a small percentage, but obviously if these accidents are avoidable the manufacturers should be making every effort to prevent them from happening again. That's not to suggest they're not, or that they need further incentives to do so. It's also not to suggest cellphone users need be overly paranoid about it.

      Oh, and one thing that definitely does help are manufacturers trying to boost sales of overpriced accessories through fear: the usual pretense is that all of this wouldn't have happened if the user hadn't bought a third party battery. Sure, that's it. And the third party battery is inherently unsafe why exactly, assuming it is? To the best of my knowledge, I suspect if it's true, the major reason is that any safety mechanisms built into the manufacturer's batteries are proprietary and, for the sake of making a fast buck, the manufacturer isn't divulging them. Small number of cases or not, that's not on.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    4. Re:Very Small Percentage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is especially true given that the article also states that many of these cases are due to 3rd party batteries.

      Probably like the 30 cent specials you can find on ebay.

    5. Re:Very Small Percentage by Ironsides · · Score: 4, Informative

      Warranties mean that if there is a problem, exchange for a working item. Defective is only applied when there is something fundamentally wrong with the item itself. Such as those hard drives that had a 33% failure rate in the first year about two years ago. 4.88 10E-7 is a lower failure rate than I have had with bad DVDs. (4 disks bad, ~300 Disks bought, 1.3percent failure).

      --
      Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
    6. Re:Very Small Percentage by doublem · · Score: 1

      I am sure it is painful for the people

      At several levels.

      First, there's being burned on the purchase of a defective phone.

      Second, there's being burned BY the exploding phone.

      Third, there's being burned by your health insurance company when they refuse to cover the accident. (Harvard Pilgrim LOVES to do this whenever they can. I was in a car crash and they're refusing to cover my hospital time. Can't say more on that as the lawyers have it at the moment)

      Fourth, there's the burn of having to tell people HOW you got injured when a lot of people still think "Exploding Cell Phones" are an urban myth used by scam artists to trump up lawsuits.

      Fifth, there's the damage to one's sex life.

      Sixth, there's not HAVING a cell phone, at least for a while. This may not be a bad thing, depending on what you thought of the device before.

      Man, having a cell phone explode really does burn you in a lot of ways.

      --
      "Live Free or Die." Don't like it? Then keep out of the USA
    7. Re:Very Small Percentage by gbjbaanb · · Score: 1

      I thought about comparing that statistic with the chance of getting struck by lightning.. off I go to google, and look what I found:

      Two Koreans with cellphones struck by lightning

      Forget dodgy batteries - you're going to die no matter what you do!

      (FYI: for an American, you have a 1 in 280,000 chance of being zapped.)

    8. Re:Very Small Percentage by Oddly_Drac · · Score: 1

      "4.88 10E-7 is a lower failure rate than I have had with bad DVDs."

      And what injury could you sustain from a bad DVD?

      --
      Oddly Draconis
      Too cynical to live, too stubborn to die.
    9. Re:Very Small Percentage by AviLazar · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Pretty much any product you buy has some kind of danger associated with it, and a chance for mishap (i.e. papercuts). Some things are obviously more dangerous then others - but if the percentages are that low - it is insignificant. Given those low percentages - there is a reasonable assumption that the cell phone you use will be safe. It is unreasonable to change the entire system for a nil amount of cases. Now I am of the mindset that one life is worth more then any amount of money - but still - we do need to be reasonable. As long as the companies make honest restitutions to the folks who get hurt as well as try and fix the defect, then IMHO they are doing just fine.
      Again, those percentages are so small I would say that the companies still have made the consumers more then reasonably confident in the safety of their material....whats the instances (per year) that regular phones hurt people? Or tv's? You are putting an electrical device about 3 inches from your brain - something COULD happen - apparantly its very small percentage but it is possible...it's also possible that an asteroid is goign to hit the planet.

      --

      I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
    10. Re:Very Small Percentage by HoldenCaulfield · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Okay, so let's say my mother's hair catches fire. While I don't expect everyone to respond the same way, I'm not going to think because the odds somehow were against my mother that the cell company is suddenly evil. Would I hope that the company would do the right thing and cover any damages/medical? Sure.

      The grandparent mentioned the odds are something like 1 out of 2 million. Would you prefer the cell companies re-engineer their batteries, perhaps resulting in bulkier or more expensive phones? At some point, the investment isn't worth the return . . . much like the scene in Fight Club where they're discussing that it's cheaper to deal with the defects than to do recalls . . .

    11. Re:Very Small Percentage by ozbird · · Score: 1

      How do these figures compare with mobile (aka cell) phones being struck by lightning? I believe that's the correct unit of measure, and is probably more likely.

    12. Re:Very Small Percentage by Archangel_Azazel · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Seriously, you take a risk walking outside everyday. Who knows, there's an infintesimal chance you could be hit by a stray meteor...

      Yes, things come with warranties about being free from defects, but should we REALLY be THAT concerned about something with such a low failure rate? If that were the case, then just sign up for a padded room with a lock in it, it's pretty much the only place you'll be anywhere near safe...both from yourself and others. Of course...you might rip out the padding and try and eat it.....

      --
      Your mind is like a parachute. It works best when it's been opened.
    13. Re:Very Small Percentage by AviLazar · · Score: 1

      Seventh, there's the trauma you will have with using cell phones (though this might not be bad as you will have one less expense each month). But man, seeing your kids use a cell phone might give you a heart attack :)

      --

      I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
    14. Re:Very Small Percentage by TheKidWho · · Score: 0

      Dude, if your cell phone is your sex life, then you got problems to begin with!

    15. Re:Very Small Percentage by doublem · · Score: 1

      Point. If your hip has the scard from third degree burns, seeing your kids raise on to their ear won't be fun.

      --
      "Live Free or Die." Don't like it? Then keep out of the USA
    16. Re:Very Small Percentage by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      And what injury could you sustain from a bad DVD?

      Puncture wound. Now what does that have to do with failure rates?

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    17. Re:Very Small Percentage by doublem · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I'm thinking of the damage major injuries and reconstructive surgery will do to your sex life.

      Having a mass of scar tissue can't be fun.

      And something tells me the physical pain from burn and shrapnel damage won't exactly put you in the mood.

      And to be blunt, not all scars are sexy.

      --
      "Live Free or Die." Don't like it? Then keep out of the USA
    18. Re:Very Small Percentage by kfg · · Score: 5, Insightful

      . . .electrical items that catch fire could be considered defective. Are you this lacksadaisical about anything you buy?

      And yet a candle that doesn't catch fire could be considered defective. A candle that isn't defective can burn your house down (or your mom's hair off) even when used as directed. Damned if I'd let my mom buy one of those things, but I can't believe she'd be so lackadaisical as to actually do so.

      Dude, all electrical devices carry a certain risk of fire, your house for instance (yes, your house is most likely an electrical device). I wouldn't go to sleep tonight if I were you. Houses catch fire from inside the walls all the time.

      If the odds of it happening to me are lower than being hit by an asteroid, well, I'll take whatever precautions seem warrented, like feeling the charger/battery the first couple times I use it to see if it's overheating, but no, I'm not going to worry about it much. That way lies madness.

      . . .such items come with warranties about being free from defects. . .

      Warranties do not actually certify that any particular item is defect free. This isn't possible in this particular universe. There is always a risk factor involved. In fact, ironically, that's why products come with "guaruntees," because they can't actually give you one that it won't fail, but can guaruntee that some particular, but as yet unidentified, unit will fail.

      What they can do is give you compensation in the event of failure, which is the sole function of a warranty.

      If you really think they're there to protect you from harm you need to do a good deal more thinking about the nature of risk, which is not a bad idea in general anyway, and you look like you could use it.

      KFG

    19. Re:Very Small Percentage by TheKidWho · · Score: 1

      The phone doesn't exactly explode the way a bomb does. Not to mention, with most cellphones, you have something inbetween the battery and you, namely the phone itself so any blast really goes out the other way to your hand.

    20. Re:Very Small Percentage by KarmaMB84 · · Score: 1

      The companies should do everything they can to prevent catastrophic failures of their products from harming human life. Yes, even if safety means they can't produce tiny products for tiny prices, I still expect them to make their product safe.

      If the phones had a 1 out of 500,000 chance of killing someone, would you still be okay with demanding the low price unsafe product?

    21. Re:Very Small Percentage by Carbonite · · Score: 1

      Until your mom's hair catches fire.

      Yes, I would be upset if a cell phone caused my mom's hair to catch on fire. That doesn't mean that I'm worried that such a thing will occur. I always find it absurd when people talk about "even one defect" or "just one death" being "one too many" without putting the matter into context.

      If we're talking about 170 million cellphones, 83 defects certainly aren't unreasonable. I also believe that a drug that was used by 170 million people wouldn't be unsafe if caused 83 deaths. Would I be upset if this drug killed my mother? Of course! That doesn't mean I wouldn't take it though (assuming it served some medical purpose).

      --
      ich muß mehr Kuhglocke haben
    22. Re:Very Small Percentage by Oddly_Drac · · Score: 1

      "Puncture wound. Now what does that have to do with failure rates?"

      Lordy, another one. Right, Slashdot uses a system of threading for 'comments', which allows for the nesting of multiple answers to an original post, which gives people plenty of opportunity to produce unoriginal and bland 'funnies' in response to a 'straight' line. So when you (and I'm laughing internally. Still!) said "Now what does that have to do with failure rates?", you may not have read the entirety of the discussion before feverishly jabbing the 'submit' button.

      The premise is that an extremely small failure rate is acceptable. My argument is that an extremely small failure rate that causes bodily injury is slightly different to a comparison of the failure rate for something like DVD blanks, which rarely, if ever, spontaneously injure people.

      The latter attracts lawsuits like nomarks to a straightline on slashdot.

      Was that good enough, or should I use smaller words and fire up Visio?

      --
      Oddly Draconis
      Too cynical to live, too stubborn to die.
    23. Re:Very Small Percentage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      83/170 Million. Not nearly high enough. ALL 170M of them should explode, preferably today.

    24. Re:Very Small Percentage by l4m3z0r · · Score: 1
      Think about how many computer power supplies have shorted out and caught fire (i have had 2 at my job in the last year, and we only have 17 computers). It is a shame, and I am sure it is painful for the people and i do feel bad, but lets not get out of hand with this.

      Sure that may be true but most of us don't hold computer power supplys up against our head for long periods of time. Basically a few of these cases are bound to happen, but with counterfeit chargers and batterys being the majority of the cause something needs to be done about it. Not about warning people, but about keeping counterfeits off the shelves...

    25. Re:Very Small Percentage by doublem · · Score: 1

      So you get a burned hand.

      Which, for most /.ers, takes us right back to the "exploding" cell phone damaging your sex life.

      --
      "Live Free or Die." Don't like it? Then keep out of the USA
    26. Re:Very Small Percentage by gtkuhn · · Score: 1

      That's the second comparison to "getting hit by an asteroid" I've read. First off, you'd have to be in space to get hit by an asteroid. I think you meant meteorite. Second, I've never heard of anyone getting hit by a meteorite, but the story mentions 83 people have had cell phones explode. Hardly the same level of risk.

    27. Re:Very Small Percentage by abulafia · · Score: 5, Interesting
      The companies should do everything they can to prevent catastrophic failures of their products from harming human life. Yes, even if safety means they can't produce tiny products for tiny prices, I still expect them to make their product safe.

      You have to define your terms. What does "safe" mean? Does it mean that the product will never harm someone? If so, then the product cannot be produced - there is no such thing as a perfectly safe object.

      If you accept that it is acceptable that sold objects can have some margin of risk associated with them, then, yes, your next question comes into play.

      If the phones had a 1 out of 500,000 chance of killing someone, would you still be okay with demanding the low price unsafe product?

      That depends on the price point for more or less safety, the usage pattern, what exactly the "chance of killing someone" means (e.g., over the lifetime of the product, per use, etc.), and the actual utility of the item.

      These are partially actuarial questions, and partially personal utility/economic questions only individuals can make for themselves. There are products out there that have much higher death/serious injury risks associated with them that are happily bought and sold every day (think parachutes and prescription drugs, for starters).

      Bruce Schneier has a great quote about this:

      More people are killed every year by pigs than by sharks, which shows just how good we are at evaluating risks.
      - Bruce Schneier
      Another example: More children drown every year in 5 gallon buckets than due to guns. I see no "million mom marches" against these preventable deaths, even though safety features could be thought up to prevent bucket drownings at significantly less cost-per-unit than some of the features proposed for guns. (Sorry, I couldn't find a reference for that figure on buckets online - I read it in the Economist some time back.)

      If you don't accept that safety is an economic tradeoff, you'll never be able to make rational choices about safety.

      (For my part, I hate cell phones, so I don't have one because the (negative) utility of the product is certainly not worth the cost - no risk analysis needed.)

      --
      I forget what 8 was for.
    28. Re:Very Small Percentage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Warranties do not actually certify that any particular item is defect free. This isn't possible in this particular universe."

      But didn't we vote for George Bush under the promise that he'd make all of the bad things in the world go away? He should launch an attack against the axis of cellphone evil!

    29. Re:Very Small Percentage by neafevoc · · Score: 1

      much like the scene in Fight Club where they're discussing that it's cheaper to deal with the defects than to do recalls . . .

      Narrator: A new car built by my company leaves somewhere traveling at 60 mph. The rear differential locks up. The car crashes and burns with everyone trapped inside. Now, should we initiate a recall? Take the number of vehicles in the field, A, multiply by the probable rate of failure, B, multiply by the average out-of-court settlement, C. A times B times C equals X. If X is less than the cost of a recall, we don't do one.

      Business woman on plane: Are there a lot of these kinds of accidents?

      Narrator: You wouldn't believe.

      Business woman on plane: Which car company do you work for?

      Narrator: A major one.

      Courtesy of IMDB.

    30. Re:Very Small Percentage by Kehvarl · · Score: 0

      If the phones had a 1 out of 500,000 chance of killing someone, would you still be okay with demanding the low price unsafe product?


      Yes. that's still a far less than 1% chance that my phone would kill me.

    31. Re:Very Small Percentage by lothar97 · · Score: 1
      It's this ultra-left wing logic that "if it saves one life then it's worth itUmmm, no. I think it's more like "continuous 24/7/365 news media will sensationalize (err, report) any insignificant statistic as long is is remotely connected to FUD. It drives up ratings, and increases consumption."

      It is true though, liberals are more likely to try to protect the public at large, although there is a cost-benefit analysis- and not everything is championed. Learn some more "awful" liberal protections at http://tvnewslies.org/html/day_in_the_life_of_joe_ middle-.html

      --

    32. Re:Very Small Percentage by radish · · Score: 1

      If 170 million meteorites fell to earth next year, I feel fairly sure more than 83 people would get hit by them. Hell, hundreds of people get killed every year crossing the road...how are 83 burnt legs worth worrying about?

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    33. Re:Very Small Percentage by Vinnie_333 · · Score: 1
      To me, this is way within acceptable margin of error

      Good. You have a cell phone blow up in your face. Acceptable margin of error goes out the window when catastrophic errors occur. In that case 1 is too many and company's spend lot's of money to try to prevent them from happening. Burns to the neck, face, hands ... not good for a company's PR. The potential lawsuit can FAR outweight the money it would cost to recall the product or, better yet, the R&D time it would take to keep this shit from happening. Of course, they want to get their product out fast so they wind up using untested parts (i.e., badly produced batteries). As battery power needs become greater, the potential for disaster becomes greater. My company spends a great deal of time testing the batteries in our products and qualifying our suppliers. I have no leniecy for these cell phone manufactoers. Complete carelessness on their part.

      --

      "We shall party like the Greeks of old! You know the ones I mean." - HedonismBot
    34. Re:Very Small Percentage by ealar+dlanvuli · · Score: 1

      With logic like that... ...I got nothing.

      --
      I live in a giant bucket.
    35. Re:Very Small Percentage by goatan · · Score: 2, Informative
      much like the scene in Fight Club where they're discussing that it's cheaper to deal with the defects than to do recalls . . .

      Narrator: A new car built by my company leaves somewhere travelling at 60 mph. The rear differential locks up. The car crashes and burns with everyone trapped inside. Now, should we initiate a recall? Take the number of vehicles in the field, A, multiply by the probable rate of failure, B, multiply by the average out-of-court settlement, C. A times B times C equals X. If X is less than the cost of a recall, we don't do one.

      Business woman on plane: Are there a lot of these kinds of accidents?

      Narrator: You wouldn't believe.

      Business woman on plane: Which car company do you work for?

      Narrator: A major one.

      Here's two real life examples of this kind of thinking Ford and Chevrolet. In both these cases the car manufacturer knew about the problems but figured it was cheaper to pay out any court cost rather than fix the problem.

      --
      Saying Apple is better than MS is like saying Botulism is better than rabies.

    36. Re:Very Small Percentage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the third party battery is inherently unsafe why exactly, assuming it is?

      Most Li-ion betteries have a fuse to prevent a fire if the terminals are short-circuited, and a thermistor for the charger to monitor the battery temperature. (That's what the terminal marked 'T' is.) If there is no fuse or the thermistor is out of spec, the battery can overheat.

    37. Re:Very Small Percentage by kfg · · Score: 2, Insightful

      . . . you'd have to be in space to get hit by an asteroid.

      I am in space. So are you. So are asteroids, some of which could be both resting on what's left of you and your living room and in outer space at one and the same time! Frickin' awesome, ain't it?

      The sky is falling on me

      I've never heard of anyone getting hit by a meteorite

      And now you have. It happens. And it's far more likely that your house (with you in it) will get hit by one. That happens comparitively often. Shit's falling out of the sky all the time. Not having heard of something is sometimes a sign of ignorance, not a sign that it doesn't happen.

      By the way, the odds of getting hit by an asteroid have been calculated at 1 in 20,000.

      . . .the story mentions 83 people have had cell phones explode. Hardly the same level of risk.

      Exactly. That's roughly 1 in 2,000,000. And only a few of those people suffered any injury, since the risk of it happening to explode while it's on your person is even smaller, and even smaller while actually holding it to your ear.

      And how many cars have caught fire today alone? I'm sorry, but if you're plummeting down the highway in a ton and a half projectile gas bomb and worrying about your cell phone exploding I'm going to persist in thinking you have a problem with risk assessment.

      Ah, but what if it happened to someone I knew?

      Well, a dear, dear friend of mine actually died by falling down stairs. I miss her terribly. I'm not any more afraid of stairs than I was before, as the odds of my dying by falling down stairs remain equally low now as they did before.

      Another friend died, at 33 years old, because a bit of her brain just kinda exploded one day. As it turns out brains don't have any kind of warranty at all. More people die from this than have cell phones explode (none of whom have died).

      I'm afraid I'm so lackadaisical about the condition of my brain that I really don't even think about it much, even after suffering such a loss of friendship.

      KFG

    38. Re:Very Small Percentage by kfg · · Score: 1

      But didn't we vote for George Bush under the promise that he'd make all of the bad things in the world go away?

      Well yes, but then he's also said that lying is one of the signs of a good leader (no, I'm not quite making that up).

      KFG

    39. Re:Very Small Percentage by Drachemorder · · Score: 2, Informative
      "If the phones had a 1 out of 500,000 chance of killing someone, would you still be okay with demanding the low price unsafe product?"

      I'd take those odds. If you think 1 in 500,000 is a realistic chance, I have some lottery tickets I'd like to sell you.

    40. Re:Very Small Percentage by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      The premise is that an extremely small failure rate is acceptable. My argument is that an extremely small failure rate that causes bodily injury is slightly different to a comparison of the failure rate for something like DVD blanks, which rarely, if ever, spontaneously injure people.

      [obFightClub]The other premise is that A*B*C=X, where A is the unit production, B is the failure rate for a particular flaw, and C is the average payout of a lawsuit. Y is the cost to repair that flaw. If X>Y, then no recall.

      It would appear that X>>>Y, since the volume is very high, and less than 100 phones have exploded, even when subjected to the great unwaashed masses who do things like take the phone into the shower, leave it in a puddle, and drive over it. It could be argued that, given the environment it exists in, some failures were to be expected, especially when the GUW doesn't want to pay more than $100 for said phone.

      Was that good enough, or should I use smaller words and fire up Visio?

      Oh, yes please. I could use the nap ;)

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    41. Re:Very Small Percentage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These are only reports of them blowing up, they may cause injuries, but I have not heard of any deaths yet

    42. Re:Very Small Percentage by Neward+Rylet · · Score: 1

      Good. You have a cell phone blow up in your face. Oh the irony! The person who voiced their acceptance of the hazard is the first to have his face mutilated! What are the chances!?

    43. Re:Very Small Percentage by Neward+Rylet · · Score: 2, Funny

      More people are killed every year by pigs than by sharks
      That's the last time I swim in pig-infested water!

    44. Re:Very Small Percentage by firephreek · · Score: 1

      And what exactly is the value you're placing on the human lives in the car at risk? You're saying that if they die because of a defect that was known by the manufacturer, that's ok because it's cheaper to sacrafice the life for convienence? To even discuss matters of safety in terms of dollar amounts is sick and irresponsible. We need to discuss responsiblilty. Kyocera, upon learning that their was an irregularity in their product and that irregularity could cause harm, they have a responsibility to notify the purchaser. Whether or not the purchaser then decides to return the product becomes their own decision, and therfore, their responsibility. I admire Kyocera for doing the right thing and recalling these cellphones. Even if it is 'only' 40,000, They've shown that they are a responsible and well-minded corporation. It makes me even happier to support them by continuing to use my own Kyocera phone. I realize it might be cliched, but does anyone else wonder if this corporate attitude is surprising coming from their Japanese background and origins? Why don't we hear more of this sort of thing with american companies? We only ever seem to hear about them covering up, or as stated above, about them waiting for it to be cheaper to do the recall than to slide the problem under the rug.

    45. Re:Very Small Percentage by Frank+T.+Lofaro+Jr. · · Score: 1

      Bad DVDs won't kill you.

      --
      Just because it CAN be done, doesn't mean it should!
    46. Re:Very Small Percentage by FireFury03 · · Score: 1, Funny

      More children drown every year in 5 gallon buckets than due to guns

      Pleazse demonstrate how you drown due to a gun? :)

    47. Re:Very Small Percentage by AB3A · · Score: 1
      Okay, so let's say my mother's hair catches fire.

      First, if you've ever looked at what she probably sprays on her hair to hold it in place, you'd have to agree that just about anything could do that. Hint: I use hairspray to launch spuds more than 500 Feet in the air.

      Second, the more dense the energy content of the battery, the more likely it will exhibit extraordinary exothermic tendencies if shorted. It could be dropped in water and still "work". Yet, it's not healthy.

      Put two and two together and what could happen?

      Look, we already have warnings in manuals and such. We are drowning in warning labels everywhere. Would yet another warning get noticed?

      We place warnings on bleach not to mix it with other cleaners such as ammonia. Yet every so often some fool does it anyway. It's such a routine event that it barely makes the news most of the time. Things like this show me that there are limits to warning labels.

      The fundamental issue is that if you use allow a product with any latent energy in it to be used millions of below average people, someone is going to get hurt. I'm sorry, I really doubt it has as much to do with the battery as it does the user's lack of caution or awareness. And frankly, we can only stick so many warning labels on daily life. Let's save the labels for the non-intuitive hazards that matter.
      --
      Nearly fifty percent of all graduates come from the bottom half of the class!
    48. Re:Very Small Percentage by tompaulco · · Score: 2, Informative

      >By the way, the odds of getting hit by an asteroid have been calculated at 1 in 20,000.

      Interesting. I read that 6 people have been hit by a meteorite since 1775. And what is a meteorite but an asteroid that manages to hit the Earth before being totally burned up.
      Assuming that more than 120,000 people have died since 1775, I would say that the statistics are wrong.

      Maybe that is just the figure the insurance companies use in order to justify charging me more for insurance.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    49. Re:Very Small Percentage by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      Surprisingly, though, you have a better than even chance of surviving a lightning strike.
      But then, nobody has yet died of a cell phone "explosion", have they?

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    50. Re:Very Small Percentage by kfg · · Score: 1

      Assuming that more than 120,000 people have died since 1775, I would say that the statistics are wrong.

      Or ignoring time before 1775 is wrong.

      KFG

    51. Re:Very Small Percentage by gbjbaanb · · Score: 1

      maybe they have, just that they can't call 911 afterwards :)

    52. Re:Very Small Percentage by snellgrove2 · · Score: 1

      I dont mind about PSU fires, to be honest.. the PC isnt held against the side of my face, unlike a phone.

    53. Re:Very Small Percentage by Carnildo · · Score: 1

      Oh, and one thing that definitely does help are manufacturers trying to boost sales of overpriced accessories through fear: the usual pretense is that all of this wouldn't have happened if the user hadn't bought a third party battery. Sure, that's it. And the third party battery is inherently unsafe why exactly, assuming it is? To the best of my knowledge, I suspect if it's true, the major reason is that any safety mechanisms built into the manufacturer's batteries are proprietary and, for the sake of making a fast buck, the manufacturer isn't divulging them.

      Actually, it's because the safety devices built into manufacturers' and reputable third parties' batteries are expensive, on the order of $1-$2 per battery. For the sake of making a fast buck, the cheap battery manufacturers don't include them.

      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
    54. Re:Very Small Percentage by InfiniteWisdom · · Score: 1

      Lithium Ion batteries are inherently unsafe. If improperly charged, lithium metal can be formed on the electrodes which is highly reactive and will catch fire or explode. Thats the reason you can only buy lithium-ion batteries as a battery pack, not independent cells, the way you can with NiCd or NiMH batteries, and there are no Li-Ion AA or AAA cells.

      If the third party manufacturer is a reputed electronics company, its probably OK, but if its some "generic" brand, you're playing with fire... literally.

    55. Re:Very Small Percentage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Was that good enough, or should I use smaller words and fire up Visio?

      You're a female, aren't you?

    56. Re:Very Small Percentage by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      Records of meteorite strikes before 1775 are spotty at best.
      While there is speculation that a meteorite strike killed the dinosaurs, there is little evidence to suggest that any homo sapiens were around to have been killed by it. Besides, the reference was to people being hit by a meteor, not being killed by one.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    57. Re:Very Small Percentage by Uncle+Jimmy · · Score: 1

      Pleazse demonstrate how you drown due to a gun? :)

      Shoot person, not directly in the head or chest. Throw in water.

    58. Re:Very Small Percentage by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      If you were holding that computer power supply against your ear when it caught fire, you might be a bit more upset about it.

      --
      What?
    59. Re:Very Small Percentage by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      ...where they're discussing that it's cheaper to deal with the defects than to do recalls . . .

      It's a common practice with these guys.

      --
      What?
    60. Re:Very Small Percentage by GumphMaster · · Score: 1

      Actually the odds are smaller than that because it is the battery, not the phone, that's the problem. Of those 170 million phones some will have had two or maybe three batteries in their life. Some carry a spare battery because they cannot bear to be without the irradiation of their brain for a few hours, while others have simply replaced batteries that died of old age.

      --
      Patent litigation: A doctrine of Mutually Assured Destruction... in which everyone seems willing to push the button
    61. Re:Very Small Percentage by kkerwin · · Score: 1
      Perhaps an offtopic comment, but I find this similar to the generous daemonization the Catholic Church received from the media regarding the not-so-prevalent phenomenon of child abuse by clergy.

      The media is most certainly in the habit of making isolated observations of reality, and then placing them on a podium for all to see. Problem is, that's all that we all see. The subsequent conclusion by the uneducated and inundated public is that the rare is real, and common.

      Jean Baudrillard wrote of such a phenomenon in his book, Simulacrum and Simulation. (Interesting side note, Simulacrum was featured in the original Matrix movie: it is the book that Neo uses to hide his pirated software in the opening scenes). Here's a link:

      http://www.uta.edu/english/hawk/semiotics/baud.htm

      Kris Kerwin

      kkerwin@insi__REMOVE_ME__ghtbb.com

      --
      Kris Kerwin kkerwin@insi__REMOVE_ME__ghtbb.com
    62. Re:Very Small Percentage by shadowjk · · Score: 1

      However, CDs or DVDs spinning at 52X have been known to explode and shoot shrapnel out of the drive bays.

    63. Re:Very Small Percentage by kfg · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Records of meteorite strikes before 1775 are spotty at best.

      There's a dandy one out in Arizona. I like it because it's very photogenic. There are about 150 known major impact craters and God only knows how many actual meteorites predating 1775 just lying around (they can be dated with reasonable accuracy from the strata they are found in).

      While there is speculation that a meteorite strike killed the dinosaurs, there is little evidence to suggest that any homo sapiens were around to have been killed by it.

      You seem to be laboring under the misaprehension that the lack of homo sapiens around when the "dinosaur meteor" struck has anything to do with whether you will be around when the next meteor strikes.

      It's the statistical equivilent of The Gambler's Fallacy (The Gambler's Fallacy is probabilistic). It kills people. Pliny the Elder, for one.

      Also, whether or not the meteor was responsible for the extinction of the dinosaurs has no bearing on whether or not it hit any particular dinosaurs, and it's a rather peculiar idea to think that it makes a difference statistically that it was a dinosaur standing there instead of a person. Dinosaurs, people, hamsters, warthogs, cardboard cutouts, they're all perfectly equivilent with regards to risk factor of being hit by a ten kilometer in diameter rock you know.

      In any case, statistics do not determine reality. They are history. This makes them a crude predictive tool for those repetitious things of which we are ignorant of the determinisitc parameters. For those things of which we are certain we have better and more accurate predictive tools.

      Statistics can give us some idea of the rate and geographic distribution of meteor impacts. From this we can make a deduction of whether or not there will be people standing where the next "big one" hits, since we also know the geographic distribution of people, and it's the "big ones" that have an overriding influence on the risk factor of being hit.

      If a rock the size of Manhatten hits Manhatten we can deduce that it will hit a lot of people, even though the one that hit the dinosaurs only hit dinosaurs.

      "Hey, that minefield must be perfectly safe for people, because we ran some dogs across it and only dogs got blowed up, not people."

      Oooooooooook, Sparky. You first.

      There are people here now, and now is what counts now. Statistics are then.

      But let's skip all the shenanigan's over asteroid risk (actually, I was rather critical of the risk factor calculation when it appeared as a Slashdot story some time ago, but I obviously haven't let that influence my arguments now ;) ) and look at more plebian, everyday occurances, shall we? My real "gold standard" of risk is the automobile. If I drive without undue fear I don't see any reason to be overly afraid of anything with a lower risk factor.

      Annual risk of being in an auto accident (rounded off to pleasing figures):

      1 in 12

      Dying in an auto accident:

      1 in 5000

      Having your car spontaneously combust:

      1 in 10,000

      Having your cell phone spontaneously combust:

      1 in 4,000,000 (less than one per state of the union)

      Having your cell phone spontaneously combust causing injury (not counting dolls):

      1 in 8,500,000

      Having your cell phone spontaneously combust causing injury if you aren't using counterfit batteries/chargers:

      1 in 100,000,000

      Having your cell phone blow up and kill you:

      Zipola

      Sell your car, buy lots of cell phones. You'll live longer (unless you get hit by a big asteroid, of course).

      KFG

    64. Re:Very Small Percentage by Feanturi · · Score: 1

      Do you even *know* 83 people? Yes the chances of a cellphone blowing up in someone's ear is akin to 'winning' the lottery, but it *could* happen to you or anyone else that you know. It just has to happen once, to someone you care about, and your tune will change.

    65. Re:Very Small Percentage by Oddly_Drac · · Score: 1

      "even when subjected to the great unwaashed masses who do things like take the phone into the shower, leave it in a puddle, and drive over it."

      Ah, so now you're blaming the end user with a fairly nasty strawman argument, after pointing out that there is a direct link between the threat of litigation and the damage caused. As the majority of people _may_ not reach the dizzying heights of intellectual prowess that you have obviously attained, then I suspect that you don't consider these to be random events, but instead the products of abuse. Is that what you're thinking?

      "Oh, yes please. I could use the nap ;)"

      The milk and cookies will have that effect.

      --
      Oddly Draconis
      Too cynical to live, too stubborn to die.
  5. Too rare to care about? by downward+dog · · Score: 4, Interesting

    83 cell phones have exploded or caught fire--but there are millions that haven't, so it is not a big deal.

    Hmmm... How well did that logic work against Ephedra or Firestone Wilderness AT tires?

    1. Re:Too rare to care about? by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      ...Or the Ford Pinto, or the Chevy Corvair...

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    2. Re:Too rare to care about? by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      how well does that logic work against your pc(probability wise it's less safe than those cellphones probably)?
      or your television, that's also basically a ticking flame bomb?

      taking action against it though shouldn't necessarely mean panicking about it, that's the worst you can do.

      counterfeits just don't need to follow any regulation while making the batteries.. nor do they need to meet any quality standards because they're sold as someone else's batteries anyways (and indeed some of the customers are as well gullible enough to believe them to be the real deal..).

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    3. Re:Too rare to care about? by adamh526 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Lightning kills about 100 people in the U.S. each year.

      Lightning injures about 1000 people in the U.S. each year.

      The government should be sued for providing us parks to walk through while outside. That's dangerous.

    4. Re:Too rare to care about? by Phidoux · · Score: 1

      Unless of course it happens to be your head talking on the phone when it decides to explode?

    5. Re:Too rare to care about? by puckylunk · · Score: 1

      All technology should come with warnings. Hot coffee utilizes a technology called "heating" to make it more palatable for morning drivers, but the dangers of spillage (and subsequent burning!) are so great that a warning must be given. And cheap batteries can overheat. And keyboards can damage your wrists. And so on and so forth. Let me be the first to warn you. Everything is dangerous. Even the most basic, fundamental, trusted things. Dirt can contain deadly bacteria, or at the very least suffocate you. You can drown in the bath. Avoid Everything for Complete Safety. And God save you if you really need someone to warn you of every possible danger that everything presents. A guideline I go by when it comes to technology: Cheap things are CHEAP.

    6. Re:Too rare to care about? by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      with % that low it doesn't seem counterfeit batteries are a problem - THOUSANDS of phones would be exploding if counterfeit batteries were the issue! C'mon people, we drive 60+MPH with 10 to 30 gallons of gasoline, it's much more likely we'd get burned that way.....

    7. Re:Too rare to care about? by DustyShadow · · Score: 1

      My ex-girlfriend had two Firestone Wilderness AT tires blow out on her on 2 separate occasions. That happened way more than it was reported. The media only talked about the times when people died. In warm climate areas like Florida, those tires were popping like crazy.

    8. Re:Too rare to care about? by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      Can't speak to those cases specifically but often a car recall is due to a DESIGN flaw not an implementation flaw. Like the ford crown vics that would have the doors lock up and the car catch fire in low speed rear end collisions...

      If the overall cell design was flawed you'd have a point. Just because some batteries aren't being created properly doesn't mean that cell itself is flawed.

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    9. Re:Too rare to care about? by falsified · · Score: 1
      Well, the problem is that the manufacturers of the Firestone tires made the change (it made the tires a few cents cheaper, which wasn't passed onto the consumer) even though there was significant evidence there'd be a disaster. Also:

      When your tire explodes as you're going 55-75 miles per hour, eliminating your traction, you're in a different situation than a burn to your thigh, and

      Most of the time the cell phones weren't on the owner when it happened. The phone simply needs to be on. Tires blow when you're driving a vehicle, which means you're in it.

      As for ephedra, of course there's no reason for it to be banned. In most cases, the people had pre-existing conditions or took far too much of it. Congress loves to ban pretty harmless drugs though. I can think of a couple examples that are in my roommate's room right now.

      --
      HI, MY NAME IS ISAAC.
    10. Re:Too rare to care about? by dasunt · · Score: 1

      83 cell phones have exploded or caught fire--but there are millions that haven't, so it is not a big deal.

      Hmmm... How well did that logic work against Ephedra or Firestone Wilderness AT tires?

      Rational people calcate risk with math.

      Ephedra: 1% of all dietary suppliment sales, yet 64% of all adverse reactions. With an analysis of the data available at the time, there was enough indication of serious risks (heart attacks, strokes) that starting a clinical study to analyze the risks would have been unethical. Meta-analysis of the data available revealed that risk of serious side effects was 1 in 1000.

      Firestone Wilderness AT tires: 174 deaths, 700 injuries reported, out of roughly 20 million tires recalled. Roughly about one serious event in 20 thousand or so, and this is not counting blowouts that did not lead to bodily harm.

      Cellphones: From the above story -- 83 have exploded or caught fire. Injuries? A few. Number of cell phones in use? 164 million phones were sold in the second quarter alone of 2004. Lets be generous and say that most people replace their phones once every 6 months. That's 83 injuries out of 300 million, or one out of ever 3.6 million.

      So, to review:

      Ephedra risk: 1 out of 1000. Firestone tires risk: 1 out of 20,000. Cell phone risk: 1 out of 3,600,000.

      See the problem?

      Now, if these were all the same brand of cellphones, I'd suggest a recall. There has been a few recalls of a few possible problem designs, but most of the cases seem to be bootleg batteries.

      So what should we recall?

      Speaking of risk, perhaps this old post to sci.environment would be helpful, even if some of the information is probably out of date.

      You have a 1 in a million risk of dying from cancer if you live in a brick building for 2 months -- that is over 3x the risk of a cell battery exploding. You have roughly the same risk (1 in a million) from dying in your bathtub -- time to outlaw tubs, hope you like showers. 40 tablespoons of peanut butter also gives you a one-in-a-million risk, due to low levels of carcigens. There are a lot of deadly things out there.

    11. Re:Too rare to care about? by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      >When your tire explodes as you're going 55-75 miles per hour, eliminating your traction, you're in a different situation than a burn to your thigh, and
      That's true. But even when your tire explodes you are not without options. My wife had a tire blow out on her while she was on the highway presumably doing about 60 to 65. I hardly consider her an above average driver, yet she managed to get off to the side of the road without flipping the vehicle(a GMC Safari).
      Tires blowing out is not a good thing, but it happens. Manufacturers have to do tests to insure that their vehicle is able to be handled in a blowout condition. Even SUVs can be handled, but it involves at least SOME skill. Of course, a lot could depend on the traffic around you. If someone is following too close, they may rear-end you when your car slows unexpectedly, and that could be enough to unbalance your vehicle.
      In my experience, 33% of tires I have had to replace have been due to blowout. About 2/3 of those have been at highway speeds. So far, none have resulted in a rollover, or even an accident.
      Counting my blessings and so forth.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    12. Re:Too rare to care about? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A majority of the blowouts for these tires were on Ford Exploders, and they aren't the best vehicle to be in when one needs the car to handle well.

    13. Re:Too rare to care about? by falsified · · Score: 1

      If I remember it correctly, part of the problem was the combination of tires and vehicle. Ford shared a large share of the blame because the Explorer is horrible when it comes to keeping the bottom side down. Those tires, on that vehicle, was a very bad idea.

      --
      HI, MY NAME IS ISAAC.
    14. Re:Too rare to care about? by tgrigsby · · Score: 1

      More recently, the Ford Focus. Anyone see the reports about their brakes? The class action suits are working their way through the court system even as I type this.

      Look, if you make a product with the capability of self-destructing, you are responsible for taking every precaution necessary to either eliminate the risk or reduce the risk and advise the consumer of the risk. I haven't seen any verbage on my cell phone packaging that says, "Warning: There is a 1 in 2 million chance that the battery could be defective and burn your ear off in a cataclysmic failure." And if the problem is really in 3rd party battery and recharging systems, include a warning to that effect.

      --
      *** *** You're just jealous 'cause the voices talk to me... ***
    15. Re:Too rare to care about? by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      most counterfeits don't explode, they just don't have so strong quality requirements.

      so lets say that of the counterfeits 1 out of 100 000 will explode in normal use.. that's still a lot more than 1 out of 1 000 000 000(or more) as with quality requirements on originals.

      basically it's not a big problem at all and totally avoidable if you use originals and don't abuse them.
      -

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  6. Future news TSA bans batteries and beer on flights by Sai+Babu · · Score: 5, Informative

    TSA completes calculation (2+2) and determines cell phone and computer batteries pose a greater threat aboard planes than boxcutters of nail clippers. Well maybe not yet, but if trends continue, perhaps. In this article we read of exploding batteries and increasing power density. "If you're cramming more and more power in a small space, what you're making is a small bomb," said Carl Hilliard...

    Exploding batteries have already caused disruption at LAX.

    The subject of potential weapons on planes has been beat to death, but the battery angle is still interesting. Especially when you consider that a weapons intimidation power is more a function of public perception than killing power. The more press exploding batteries receive, the greater the perceived danger. Never mind that a torn beer can can do more damage.

  7. how about.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Shouldn't cellphone companies be making people aware of the hazards of usage?"

    i dunno. How 'bout *not* making them hazardous to use? Wtf is QA doing anyway? Drinking on the job?

    hrm...i take that back...even i was lit, i'd still notice a smoldering cell on the test rack.

    1. Re:how about.... by AndroidCat · · Score: 3, Funny
      On four occasions, the batteries in the Kyocera phones have short-circuited and heated up enough to trigger a built-in safety mechanism that vents superheated gases in order to avoid an explosion, according to the safety commission.
      Obviously the phones need a voice-warning politeness option. Just before venting superheated gas, the phones could speak warnings such "Whooah!", "Pardon me!", "Burrito meltdown!", "Better out than in!". (Enterprising phone companies could sell custom "blow-tone" warnings.)
      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  8. Driving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'd be a lot more afraid of getting run over by a cell phone talkin' driver than my own cell phone exploding...

    1. Re:Driving by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      I want a button on my phone to turn it into an anti-car weapon to toss at cell phone talkin' drivers.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    2. Re:Driving by JediTrainer · · Score: 1

      What about getting run over by a cell phone talkin' driver whose phone just exploded?

      I'd say that thought makes me panic a bit.

      --

      You can accomplish anything you set your mind to. The impossible just takes a little longer.
    3. Re:Driving by timts · · Score: 0

      I remember there were cases about cellphones causing brain tumor in england. also there are people mentioning living close to high voltage electric tower causing 80% of new born baby girls. I wonder if this cellphone and all the computer radiation etc will cause a large portion of new born population female. that will be a huge problem in future.

    4. Re:Driving by menscher · · Score: 1

      Why is that a problem?

    5. Re:Driving by timts · · Score: 0

      you dont think very unbalanced male:female ratio is a social problem?

    6. Re:Driving by menscher · · Score: 1

      No. But then again, I'm a male. Females might have differing views (they usually do).

  9. Why is it... by automag · · Score: 3, Insightful
    ...that such recalls must necessarily result in a ton of negative publicity for the company recalling the product with... ummm... 'challenges'?

    Seems to me that there's no better way to ensure that companies will do all they can to cover up the problems with their products when they know that any admittal of problems is only going to cause negative publicity, lawsuits, etc.

    --
    ---As my daddy used to tell me: "You gotta be smart before you can be a smartass."
    1. Re:Why is it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By reading the article about the battery recall, doesnt it seem that the cell phone company is actually trying to take responsibility? They trusted a battery manufacturer who turned out to be not so good, and they immediately made amends.
      I mean, if you follow the same standards for software, Microsoft would have to recall almost everything they ever sold! Just because malfunctioning software doesn't cause bodily harm (although it might cause you to tear out your hair) it becomes unfair on a handset manufacturer when it gets that kind of negative publicity.
      Also by saying "Shouldn't cell phone companies take note of this", do you think they dont?

    2. Re:Why is it... by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

      any admittal of problems is only going to cause negative publicity, lawsuits, etc.

      Well, except for the fact that a coverup can add another zero or two to the judgement/settlement...

  10. What??? by isa-kuruption · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Most of these mishaps are blamed on counterfeit batteries and chargers.
    and then...
    Shouldn't cellphone companies be making people aware of the hazards of usage?

    So you want cellphone companies to tell you to not buy batteries off of ebay, but only one of their batteries from one of their approved resellers? And then you'll be complaining about unfair business practices, how they are trying to monopolize the battery business, etc etc.

    1. Re:What??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      So you want cellphone companies to tell you to not buy batteries off of ebay, but only one of their batteries from one of their approved resellers?

      You make a very good point, this isn't a rebuttal but I want to add that when you buy a new cellphone with a service provider (I wouldn't know about buying a cellphone in retail, I only got my two cellphones from the service provider when I signed up with them), the service provider does mention that buying an uncertified battery or charger (some cheapo generic thing from Radio Shack) could be hazardous to the phone and could void your phone warranty in some cases.

      It could be that I just got served by a good employee on both times, but I do seem to remember something to the matter being written in the service contract and/or phone manual.
    2. Re:What??? by Cynikal · · Score: 1

      Didn't lexmark make this same claim about their printers if you used generic ink refills?

    3. Re:What??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or perhaps cellphone companies should create a few different types of standardized battery designs and allow reputable third-parties (Duracell, Energizer, etc) to produce replacement batteries. The only reason people buy cheapo replacement batteries is because the manufacturers charge too much for their version.

  11. The predictions were correct... by k4_pacific · · Score: 4, Funny

    Several years ago, I read an article predicting that cell phones would explode in the coming years. They were right!!

    --
    Unknown host pong.
  12. not a huge deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Cell phone companies already warn against using third party batteries which are often substandardly made. The risk is even greater with regards to Lithium Ion and Lithium Polymer batteries which require additional protection circuitry to prevent overheading / overcharging. Poorly made knockoffs often do not have these safety mechanisms or are not properly compatible with the power management subsystem in the mobiles.

    Not much to see here, don't buy shoddy accessories.

    1. Re:not a huge deal by Mr.+No+Skills · · Score: 1

      Also a good reason to buy a headset for your phone. Plus, probably not so good to hold a transmitter an inch from your brain.

      --
      Sleep is for the Weak
  13. I'm more worried about... by Sgt+O · · Score: 3, Interesting

    low level radiation, etc... My old Nokia phone used to make my monitor flicker really bad if a call was coming in and would actually turn on my cordless electric shaver if it was near by. (Yes, I got rid of it)

    1. Re:I'm more worried about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So do you have a beard or do you wet shave? ;)

    2. Re:I'm more worried about... by jridley · · Score: 1

      Do you understand the difference between ionizing and non-ionizing radiation? Apparently not.

    3. Re:I'm more worried about... by Sgt+O · · Score: 1

      "Apparently not" is right!
      Google, here I come!!!

    4. Re:I'm more worried about... by The_Mr_Flibble · · Score: 0

      My nokia used to trigger my radar detector in my car

      Great fun blasting down the road at er the speed limit and my phone rings then my radar dector goes off so I try to answer the phone and throw the anchor out the window.

      It's very difficult I almost spilt my beer.

    5. Re:I'm more worried about... by chickygrrl · · Score: 1

      Several of the demo phones in my kiosk will do this to my computer, most notably the Motorola V400. At home it'll just mess with my speakers.

    6. Re:I'm more worried about... by mzwaterski · · Score: 0

      would actually turn on my cordless electric shaver if it was near by WHAT? Did your razor have some kind of wireless switch? Every razor that I've seen has a physical on/off switch. Can you explain this?

    7. Re:I'm more worried about... by tho+1234 · · Score: 1

      UV light is non-ionizing radiation, yet it is a well known cancer risk and is able to fuse together adjacent nucleotides in the DNA. It is frequently used to kill bacteria because it is so effective at damaging DNA.

      Your microwave oven is also non-ionizing, yet it obviously has a significant effect on biological matter. And cell phone frequencies are rapidly approaching the microwave bands.

      I don't think radiation is a serious concern, and occasional use of a cell phone is unlikely to cause permanent damage. But we really don't know enough about the effects of non-ionizing radiation on the body (historically most biologists don't know physics, and most physicists don't know biology) to say so definitively, and some studies suggest that cell phone radiation does affect the development of the brain. Considering the exponential growth of wireless devices (high-bandwidth cell phones, wireless internet, bluetooth, etc) it would be foolish to say that they are safe simply because they don't have enough energy to ionize our bodies.

    8. Re:I'm more worried about... by Dr.+Cody · · Score: 1

      low level radiation, etc... My old Nokia phone used to make my monitor flicker really bad if a call was coming in and would actually turn on my cordless electric shaver if it was near by. (Yes, I got rid of it)

      All three cell phones I've owned do that. Hell, they'd even make my clock-radio bark loudly. How is that abnormal or frightening?

    9. Re:I'm more worried about... by pi42 · · Score: 1

      Same here -- every GSM phone I've owned has made my CRT flicker if I leave it right next to it.

      Not really a big deal, I don't think. I imagine it's some sort of interference with the electrons in the tube rather than some dangerous disruption of something dramatic with power or somesuch.

    10. Re:I'm more worried about... by Dr.+Cody · · Score: 1

      Not really a big deal, I don't think. I imagine it's some sort of interference with the electrons in the tube rather than some dangerous disruption of something dramatic with power or somesuch.

      On that note, does anyone know how a humble 3410 can make a clockradio bark really loudly? Is the interfernce inducted into the radio and then amplified or is the signal effecting the speaker coil itself?

      If the latter, I think Nokia might have left my cellphone set to 11.

  14. Yak Yak Yak BOOM! by Evil+W1zard · · Score: 1

    Now I have a mental image I can bring forth when I see someone talking on the cell phone in a movie theater or when I out at a nice restaurant.

    --
    News Reporters Make Tasty Polar Bear Treats!
  15. Ob by GillBates0 · · Score: 1

    Can you hear me n*BOOM*

    --
    An Indian-American Hindu committed to non-violent thought/speech/action alarmed by the global explosion of radical Islam
    1. Re:Ob by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 1

      Didn't they feature one of these phones in The Fifth Element?

    2. Re:Ob by plover · · Score: 1
      Good!

      :-)

      --
      John
  16. it IS too rare by doowy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Now, don't get me wrong, I feel bad for anyone who put a burning hot device up against their face, but 83 people?

    83 reports of this in the past 2 years - out of what, 100,000,000 cell-phone users? That's is extremley rare.

    I'm not saying such a problem should be ignored, but you can't expect anyone to prioritize it when occurences are so rare.

    and how many of the 83 reports of 'exploding batteries' were due to misuse? "the box didn't say I couldn't put my phone in the microwave"

    --
    ..mork
    1. Re:it IS too rare by zx75 · · Score: 1

      Ok, personally I think that a person who has a cellphone catch on fire against their face, and said cell phone catching on fire because it is in the microwave has bigger problems to worry about.

      I don't know about you, but I wouldn't be so happy if the cells in my head began exploding because the water inside them flash boiled due to microwave radiation.

      --
      This is not a sig.
  17. Boo! hiss! boo! by dave420 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's funny, as most people here get all pissy when Nokia introduces protection for their phones by allowing nokia-only batteries to be used. Guess what? It's for this exact thing. Nokia can't rate every battery each company comes out with for their phones, yet if one blows up, it's the phone manufacturer (not the battery manufacturer) who gets the bad press. It's protecting their business, pure and simple. :)

    1. Re:Boo! hiss! boo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you read?

      Recently, Kyocera recalled about 40,000 cellphones for free replacement

      So, the genuine, OEM, factory-approved batteries can have trouble too.

    2. Re:Boo! hiss! boo! by dave420 · · Score: 1
      Yes, and nowhere in my post did I state otherwise. I was referring to the outrage on this site towards Nokia's smart batteries, citing exploding 3rd-party batteries as an example.

      I'm well aware it can happen to any batteries (and Kyocera is by no means a major player in the cellphone market ;))

    3. Re:Boo! hiss! boo! by dave420 · · Score: 1

      My post was more of a commentary on the general slashdot attitude, not an attack on your good self :)

  18. For greater consumer satisfaction... by Gadzinka · · Score: 1

    Couple of years ago Motorola was announcing to everyone and his dog, that it will install drm-like chips in its batteries to "solve the problem of counterfeit, exploding batteries".

    I don't know if they actually started to do this, but I'm sure that it had nothing to do with vendor's batteries being sometimes an order of magnitude more expensive than generic, good brand betteries of the same parameters.

    Robert

    --
    Bastard Operator From 193.219.28.162
  19. I guess the real trick... by automag · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...is figuring out how *I* can make *your* cellphone explode when you're being a loud a**hole and chatting away at the next table, or what have you...

    --
    ---As my daddy used to tell me: "You gotta be smart before you can be a smartass."
    1. Re:I guess the real trick... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's called C4. Or putting a bullet through the phone.

  20. FAA... by sv25 · · Score: 1, Funny

    "In later news, the FAA has banned all batteries from all flights... Little Timmy won't be able to play his gameboy on those long flights."

  21. Hazardous devices by Black+Parrot · · Score: 5, Funny


    > Shouldn't cellphone companies be making people aware of the hazards of usage?

    Warning! Using this device in public places such as movie theaters or churches may result in a vigorous ass beating.
    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    1. Re:Hazardous devices by squidsoup · · Score: 1

      I've always wondered what goes on in churches.

  22. They probably do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    For a company not to have a legal disclaimer somewhere would be an incredible oversight. It's probably written in the manual somewhere - "Don't use counterfeit batteries, use ours..with 200% sales markup instead".

    If you're like most Americans you either don't RTFM or you decide that the *OEM Only* warning is only fanatical bourgeois vendor propaganda.

    So instead you go buy an "Uncle Bob's El'Cheapo Clone Battery - with Extended Long Life (tm)Runtime" from the guy wearing the long trenchcoat down the street.

  23. Math by dr_d_19 · · Score: 1

    Tyler: "A new car built by my company leaves somewhere traveling at 60 mph. The rear differential locks up. The car crashes and burns with everyone trapped inside. Now, should we initiate a recall? Take the number of vehicles in the field, A, multiply by the probable rate of failure, B, multiply by the average out-of-court settlement, C. A times B times C equals X. If X is less than the cost of a recall, we don't do one."

  24. What I want to know is... by nekoniku · · Score: 1, Funny

    ...will my tinfoil hat protect me from my exploding cell phone?

    --
    "It's a wonderful idea. But it doesn't work." -- Tad Danielewski
  25. LiIon's Roar (or thermal runaway) by G4from128k · · Score: 4, Informative

    Lithium ion batteries, so popular for their power density, are inherently unstable if they are overcharged or become too hot (about 140 F is the threshold). As a spokesperson for one battery maker said "When you heat this material up, it (can) reach an onset temperature that begins to self-heat and progresses into fire and explosion." One battery company claims to make a "safe" battery that uses phosphates, not cobalt oxides in its lithium ion. They even have a video demonstration that we can slashdot.

    --
    Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.
    1. Re:LiIon's Roar (or thermal runaway) by gilesjuk · · Score: 1

      That's exactly the person I was going to quote. Basically leaving your phone in a car on a hot sunny day is enough.

    2. Re:LiIon's Roar (or thermal runaway) by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1
      Lithium ion batteries, so popular for their power density, are inherently unstable if they are overcharged or become too hot (about 140 F is the threshold).
      These batteries are very tricky... I would advise everyone to buy A-brand batteries only, but even good batteries charged on a proper charger can explode, if the pack becomes 'unbalanced' ie. one cell is discharged less than the others in the pack, and can thus become overcharged during the charge cycle.

      I use these batteries myself in R/C models, and I take proper precautions:
      - My packs all have a 'Cell balancer' installed, which monitors individual cells during charging.
      - I put the pack (or my cellphone) to be charged inside a metal ammunitions box partially filled with sand covered by plastic, and I put a plastic bag filled with sand on top of the pack.
      - I never leave the house during the charge cycle.

      Paranoid? While I haven't heard of cell phones exploding while on the charger, I have plenty of examples (including 'after' photos) of people charging LiIon packs unattended, resulting in a burnt-out models, carpets, car seats and yes: houses.
      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    3. Re:LiIon's Roar (or thermal runaway) by sokoban · · Score: 1

      Exactly, this is the exact same problem that the original LiIon batteries in powerbook 5300's many years back had. Lithium Ion batteries create large amounts of heat and hydrogen gas when they are overcharged, or even just improperly charged. Their problem was a faulty sony recharging circuit that didn't always stop charging when full. The failure rate is low, but it does have the potential to rise both in frequency and destructiveness with increasing capacity and commoditization of LiIon batteries.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 is the magic number.
    4. Re:LiIon's Roar (or thermal runaway) by radish · · Score: 1

      I may be wrong, but LiIon cells in phones etc also have balancers & regulators. My guess is the fake ones miss out things like that, or use cheap unreliable ones, hence the problems. Personally, until I hear of incidents including first party batteries & charges, I'm not worried.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    5. Re:LiIon's Roar (or thermal runaway) by jbridge21 · · Score: 1

      omfg that video has the funniest music. all explosive product test videos should be produced like that!

    6. Re:LiIon's Roar (or thermal runaway) by Dr.+Cody · · Score: 1

      One battery company claims to make a "safe" battery that uses phosphates, not cobalt oxides in its lithium ion. They even have a video demonstration that we can slashdot.

      G4from128k is a true hero in my eyes. He has just linked to a thing of pure beauty. Think of this demonstration like--like if an angel made a movie. Yes, if an angel made a movie it would look something like this.

    7. Re:LiIon's Roar (or thermal runaway) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So basically, the problematic state of a cell is easily detectable before the catastrophic "rapid disassembly", but the detection is not done because it is "economically unjustified"? I am sure we can find so many examples of DIFFERENT handling of similar low-probability problems in transportation means industry. It smells like yet another class-action lawsuit...

  26. Should they make people aware of the hazards by KublaiKhan · · Score: 1

    ....of using cellphones? I don't think so. First, any mandated "awareness" is going to end up being much like the warnings on over-the-counter medicines--vague warnings in legalese/medicalese, printed in flyspeck 8, on whatever packaging said phone comes in. Other than compulsive readers like myself, who actually reads that?

    Also, let's let Darwinism have a chance for once, and weed the idiots out who use the "counterfeit" betteries. As for those who unluckily got one through the cellphone ssupplier....well, shows the survivors that it's not a good idea to shop there.

    Of course, just so it's clear, I also think they should take the warning tags off of hair dryers...just to see how many people decide to dry their hair in the bathtub. It's a nice quick fix for population control, anyway, ne?

    --
    In Xanadu did Kubla Khan
    A stately pleasure dome decree
    1. Re:Should they make people aware of the hazards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know about your scheme doing anything for population control, but it would definately help bump up the median IQ in the general population. Much like the plague did just prior to the onset of the Enlightenment. We've eliminated plagues, but given ourselves new ways to apply selective environmental pressures, but they'll only work effectively if we don't legislate them out of existence.

  27. DUUURRR by u-238 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Shouldn't cellphone companies be making people aware of the hazards of usage?

    Of course not. How do you expect the Corporations and their henchmen (collectivley known as The Man(TM)) to turn a significant profit in The Free Market(TM) by scaring away customers in such a manner? What a horrible capitolist you must be, you anti-American pinko ingrate.

  28. Yikes by mogrify · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What if cell malware like Skulls could be used to cause the battery to explode? Perhaps by modifying the firmware to overcharge or overload the battery? A well-written worm would have them going off like popcorn...

    --
    perl -e 'foreach(values %SIG){$_="IGNORE";}while(){}'
    1. Re:Yikes by u-238 · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of my friends dreams of sending a bios-editing worm to his gravest of enemies, with intention of turning off the CPU fan, causing the CPU to overheat to the point at which it, at minimum, destroyes a considerable portion of their system, and at maximum (and according to him was the main goal) would spark a fire and burn down their houses - while they were spleeping in it. Preferably with children present.

    2. Re:Yikes by Ismer · · Score: 1

      I don't think that would pose much of a threat. Nearly all lithium ion batteries are protected from overcharging on the hardware level. The phone software has little to nothing to do with battery charging. If a battery gets overcharged its usually because there were too many faulty components or a component went bad from abuse.

    3. Re:Yikes by radish · · Score: 1

      One of the very few (only?) hardware damaging viruses I ever heard of used a similar technique. British readers will remember the BBC micro, a cheap (for the time) computer popular in schools in the 80's. Anyway, the original design had a small charger for the some backup battery which would run when it was powered up. Due to costs they took out the battery system, but left the charging circuit hooked up, but shorted. Some evil genius figure out you could switch it on via a software interrupt...a few hours later you get smoke and a molten motherboard.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    4. Re:Yikes by Kehvarl · · Score: 0

      You say "friend," but I know you not.

    5. Re:Yikes by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      My system seems to be smart enough to shut itself down when it gets too hot. Shoot, even my PS2 does that. I discovered this amazing fact one day after my nephew dropped it on the floor and the fans power cable slipped off. After about 10 minutes of playing, it would just shut itself off.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
  29. Or... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Warning! Anti-matter Containment field failure in 3 seconds" Now that would be Enterprising! :)

    1. Re:Or... by AndroidCat · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Too late, I already use Warning! on my firewall when Slashdot proxy-probes port 8080. :)

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  30. Phone bomb? by JustNiz · · Score: 1

    > "If you're cramming more and more power in a small space, what you're making is a small bomb," said Carl Hilliard, president of the California-based Wireless Consumers Alliance,

    Hmm.. I wonder how long it will be before we're not allowed to take cellphones on planes for fear of them being used as bombs?

    1. Re:Phone bomb? by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      It won't happen as long as the bread and butter of the airline industry still chooses to communicate by cell phone. Economics prevails over safety.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    2. Re:Phone bomb? by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      Hmm.. I wonder how long it will be before we're not allowed to take cellphones on planes for fear of them being used as bombs?
      Err, dude, like I've been banned from taking my mobile to work (on offshore oil production platforms) for, like, six years now, and it's been X-rayed just about every time I've flown (for work; "flying" and "pleasure" are not words I use in the same sentence) since 1996. Why? Well in part because Mossad have been using doctored (and fully functional) mobile phones for assassinations since mobiles became popular. Hell, I worked out how to use a mobile to remotely trigger a bomb last millennium - it's not that difficult.
      >/dude-speak<

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  31. Re:Future news TSA bans batteries and beer on flig by Koyaanisqatsi · · Score: 1


    Never mind that a torn beer can can do more damage.

    Lou: That sounded like an explosion at the old Simpson place.
    Wiggum: Forget it, That's two blocks away.
    Lou: Looks like there's beer coming from the chimney.
    Wiggum: I am proceeding on foot, call in a code 8.
    Lou: We need pretzels, repeat, pretzels.

  32. Re:Future news TSA bans batteries and beer on flig by Oddly_Drac · · Score: 1

    "If you're cramming more and more power in a small space, what you're making is a small bomb," said Carl Hilliard..."

    Well, that's a fundamental misunderstanding of bombs and batteries.

    --
    Oddly Draconis
    Too cynical to live, too stubborn to die.
  33. What would they tell anyone? by gelfling · · Score: 1

    That there is a one in a million chance that the battery may burst into flames? I suppose that's a good use of everyone's attention span.....

  34. By design by zrq · · Score: 2, Funny

    I thought they were supposed to do that.

    Don't you remember ... in StarTrek, one of the standard ways of getting out of a tricky situation would be to 'switch my phaser to overload', throw it round the corner and hide. Five seconds later, loud bang, and no problem .. er, no wall ... and possibly no building .... depending on the charge left in the battery at the time.

  35. Don't automatically blame the manufacturer.. by cheddarlump · · Score: 5, Informative

    I work at a cell-phone store, and you would not believe what people do to their phones. I have seen phones get hot, vent hot gas, catch fire, bulge and almost pop, etc. In each case, it was because of something the customer had done to damage their phone. Usually, it's water damage, teenie bopper kids taking their phone into the shower cuz they can't miss that one important call. Or, even more benignly, (is that a Bushism?) if you have a little bit of drippings in your car's cupholder, and throw the phone in there when you get in the car, guess where the charging circuitry is located? Usually in the bottom of the phone. So, the next time you go plug your phone in, instead of the beautifully complex current-limiting charging circuit, you have yesterday's mocha providing a dead short.. BOOM. Please, PLEASE look to the stupid masses for the cause BEFORE blaming the manufacturers. I know there are bad designs out there, but 99.999999999 times out of a hundred, it's the idiots using them everyday. really. (flame suit on)

    1. Re:Don't automatically blame the manufacturer.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Companies should be allowed to make products that do anything anyway. It's people's choice to buy them or not. Consumer protection is a joke.

      I make a cellphone that doesn't work properly. You decide to buy it. It doesn't work. Whoop dee doo. Maybe you should have done your research. Forcing companies to make their products a certain way is like some sort of mini-slavery.

      When you decide to buy something, you did just that. You looked at the product. You had all the time in the world to decide if you want that product. You looked at it, you decided it was a fair price, and you paid for it. Simple as that. No one forced you to buy it, so don't force the company to make it a certain way. Maybe in the future, with all this legal business, companies will just sell "things." "This is a thing. I heard it can be used as a cellphone. We're not selling a cellphone here though. It's just a thing. So if it doesn't work the way you want it to, that's because it's not supposed to work any particular way, it's just a random thing." That's what companies should do. So they don't have to suffer "consumer protection."

    2. Re:Don't automatically blame the manufacturer.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right on!

    3. Re:Don't automatically blame the manufacturer.. by doublem · · Score: 1

      Cell Phone Explosion Cause:

      User=ID10T

      --
      "Live Free or Die." Don't like it? Then keep out of the USA
    4. Re:Don't automatically blame the manufacturer.. by CSG_SurferDude · · Score: 1

      I work at a cell-phone store...

      Dude, you have my deepest sympathies. That's almost as bad as admitting that you work at Walmart!

      Couldn't you have lied (like everyone else), and say "I have a friend who works at a cell-phone store"...

    5. Re:Don't automatically blame the manufacturer.. by Frank+T.+Lofaro+Jr. · · Score: 1

      As for water damage what about if it rains?

      --
      Just because it CAN be done, doesn't mean it should!
    6. Re:Don't automatically blame the manufacturer.. by gemtech · · Score: 1

      yep, I design chargers for the a MAJOR US cell phone manufacturer (take a guess who, I don't work for them, however). There are HUGE requirements for voltage control and current limits. PLUS the phones have built-in protection.

      The way I see it, the major problem is aftermarket CHARGERS. It scares me when I see what Radio Shack and Wal-Mart sells for $9.95. Only the best that China can design. Based on incomplete specifications.

      --
      Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results. Albert Einstein
    7. Re:Don't automatically blame the manufacturer.. by Upphew · · Score: 0

      Same as with toasters and baths: few exsamples help but don't cure the problem...

    8. Re:Don't automatically blame the manufacturer.. by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      Toasters and baths have already been solved. It is code in most areas that all bathroom outlets have ground-fault interrupters, and these are routinely tested any time a house is bought and sold. A toaster dropped into a bathtub in such a house shouldn't have any noticable effect other than the click of the breaker.

      Explosion upon dropping in water is not a desirable failure mode for a consumer device.

      I'm all for not protecting people from themselves, but simple standards that add little cost while adding significant benefit are perfectly reasonable.

  36. Three letter word... by Phidoux · · Score: 1

    ... ending with X that makes you deaf? Exploding cell phone?? Damn! That has more than three letters.

  37. Re:Future news TSA bans batteries and beer on flig by a24061 · · Score: 1
    Flat beer is safe.

    Unless you pour it in someone's nose.

  38. Totally BOGUS!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tyler: "A new car built by my company leaves somewhere traveling at 60 mph. The rear differential locks up.

    "New" cars haven't had rear differentials for like over a whole decade (the overwhelming vast majority of new cars anyway). About the only American cars left that are still rear-wheel drive are the Ford Mustang, Ford Crown Vic, Mercury Grand Marquis, Chevy Corvette.

    1. Re:Totally BOGUS!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong. The only cars that are front wheel drive are japanese imports and shitty domestic family sedans. Good cars have always used rear differentials

      Cadallac CTS, Cadallac STS, Lincoln LS, VW passat, Audi A4, A6, A8, BMW 3 series, 5 series, 7 series, Mercedes E and S class, Volvo 4wd models, all subaru cars, all porsche, all Jaguars, etc...

      Plus every single true sports car or SUV ever made...

    2. Re:Totally BOGUS!!! by Kehvarl · · Score: 0

      So basically, the only cars worth driving(Mustang and Corvette)?

      yeah yeah.. I'll probably be offtopic, redundant, flaimbait, troll, or funny. That's ok, I can live with it.

  39. Re:Future news TSA bans batteries and beer on flig by g0hare · · Score: 1

    Take two 9-volt batteries. Shove them together at the contacts and back up really fast. Check it out. BOOOM!

    --
    Vote Quimby!
  40. And you thought it was just a cool movie quote... by fracai · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "A new car built by my company leaves somewhere traveling at 60 miles per hour. The rear differential locks up. The car crashes and burns with everyone trapped inside. Now, should we initiate a recall? Take the number of vehicles in the field (A) multiply it by the probable rate of failure (B) then multiply the result by the average out of court settlement (C). A times B times C equals X. If X is less than the cost of the recall, we don't do one."

    It all comes down to money.
    Personally, the low number of incidents does make this pretty insignificant.

    --
    -- i am jack's amusing sig file
  41. This just means... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...that we need to be careful when using hands free and not set the damn things in our laps. :)

  42. This sounds like a job for (cue music) by gosand · · Score: 1
    So you want cellphone companies to tell you to not buy batteries off of ebay, but only one of their batteries from one of their approved resellers? And then you'll be complaining about unfair business practices, how they are trying to monopolize the battery business, etc etc.

    This sounds like a job for ...

    Da Da Ta Daaaa

    The Federal Copyright Enforcement Czar !

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  43. Not all DVD players are contained... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And what injury could you sustain from a bad DVD?

    Flying shards of plastic coming out of your DVD player comes to mind.

    1. Re:Not all DVD players are contained... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I saw someone's WinXP CD break in their CD-ROM drive. No damage was sustained. It didnt even scratch the bezel

  44. Hmm, damaged when slammed on floor maybe? by PalmKiller · · Score: 1



    Michael Sathre, who is expected to fully recover from his wounds, was picking his fully charged Verizon LG cell phone off the floor when it exploded by his side.

  45. Hazards? by hhlost · · Score: 0

    Shouldn't cellphone companies be making people aware of the hazards of usage?
    I think they outta start by disclosing the effects of high levels of radiation emitted directly into the brain.

  46. Missing the POINT!!! by fracai · · Score: 1

    The point is that companies actually use these formulas to calculate whether to do a recall or not. Well, that and it's a nice quote.

    And it was the Narrator, not Tyler.

    --
    -- i am jack's amusing sig file
    1. Re:Missing the POINT!!! by fracai · · Score: 0

      ps. it's nice how Slashdot makes this look like it's in response to the quote post and not the AC who didn't get it.

      --
      -- i am jack's amusing sig file
    2. Re:Missing the POINT!!! by KarmaMB84 · · Score: 1

      As it turns out, they were both the same person.

    3. Re:Missing the POINT!!! by fracai · · Score: 1

      so many different messages that makes me want to post...

      - shhhhh

      - haha, good point

      --
      -- i am jack's amusing sig file
  47. Exploding phones? by TheOtherChimeraTwin · · Score: 0
    Cue music for "Aquarela do Brasil"

    Then, tomorrow was another day
    The morning found me miles away
    With still a millions things to say,
    Now, as twilight beams the sky above
    Recalling thrills of our love
    There's one thing I'm certain of,
    Return, I will,
    To old Brazil.
    1. Re:Exploding phones? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, a reference to the movie Brazil! Very appropriate!

  48. It's time... by bogaboga · · Score: 1
    May be it's time we start getting them manufactured in the US. We all know that the US has the "best" of technology when compared to the rest of the world.

    Be careful. There's a potential of lawsuites in th every litigious American society.

    Cb..

    1. Re:It's time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If by "best" you mean bulky, half-baked and five years out of date technology, then certainly. Otherwise, we all know that European phones are far superior.

  49. Re:Better than blaming it on the dog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    because of batteries overheating and venting superheated gases

    Umm, it was my phone, honest

  50. So where do I Find these "Genuine" Batteries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I recently found a new battery for my Motorola, after searching for several weeks. I am in the UK btw. No doubt it's a "counterfeit", but I am pleased to find one of any sort.

    "Car Phone Warehouse" at Bristol Cribbs Causeway is listed on the Motorola Web site as one of their Agents. When I asked them for a new battery they treated me as crazy. I asked therefore what was meant by their being a Motorola "agent", and they said their workshop could provide "spares" but the battery was a "consumable", not a "spare"! And they did not keep "consumables" for my phone because it had been discontinued for over a year. I said it was precisely because the phone was that old that the battery needed replacing, all the more reason why they should sell them.

    Several other shops found batteries under the counter that were almost but not quite the same size, shape, and contact layout. Every model of phone seems to have different battery. Why can't there be standardisation?

    I was persistent, but most users must sling their phone when the battery is clapped. So much for environmental responsibility.

    1. Re:So where do I Find these "Genuine" Batteries by zx75 · · Score: 1

      Eh, just find any old battery that will fit (even loosely) inside the casing and break out the soldering iron. I'm sure it'll all be fine.

      Alternatively you could get a battery that doesn't fit (bigger is better, right?) and use duct tape to secure it to the outside of the phone and then rewire the battery contacts to ensure a solid connection.

      --
      This is not a sig.
  51. *bomb* by nevernet · · Score: 1

    Well, given over half of the people in the world have them...I congratulate Bush on finding the weapons of mass destruction....of were these the weapons of mass communication?

  52. I use Lipo's in RC Airplanes... by C.+Alan · · Score: 1

    ...and if they are not treated right, they will vent or explode. The little cell phone lipo battery is nothing compared to a high discharge 2100ma three cell lipo that go off like a cherry bomb if you overcharge it, or punchure it during a crash. But then again, model airplane fuel is very volitle, and has a hight nitro content. So either way, you have to be careful. Batteries are like any other power sources, they can be dangerous if not treated right.

    I have read quite a few horry stories about guys burning up model planes that took hundreds of hours to build, and automobiles and workshops because they did not take the proper safey precautions when dealing with these batteries.

    1. Re:I use Lipo's in RC Airplanes... by LanceUppercut · · Score: 1

      Cell phone battery is LiIon, not a LiPo. It being a hard-cased LiIon is main reason for these incidents occuring without warning and being so violent.

  53. Re:And you thought it was just a cool movie quote. by KarmaMB84 · · Score: 1

    ofc, that's only because it's not you.

  54. Re:Think of the children? by roman_mir · · Score: 1

    talk about insecure.. it is when the truth is considered to be flamebait I think that the terrorist win ;)

    So what the mods are saying is that these exploding phones are not same old-same old FUD mongering?

  55. Re:Future news TSA bans batteries and beer on flig by KarmaMB84 · · Score: 1

    If you're packing the battery with more and more volatile chemicals that may explode to get that power, it's quite right.

  56. Iraqi Civilians by cdrguru · · Score: 1, Insightful
    OK, let's assume for the sake of argument that the majority of the US is composed of evil people that simply want to kill others for sport, fun and to steal their possessions. Everybody is fair game in the whole world (outside of the US) and if you don't stop us, we're going to kill everyone else. Is that what you really think?

    If you believe that some small fraction of the Iraqi population is just trying to defend their homes from ruthless invaders, well, what about the rest of the people there? Why isn't this resistance universal? How come there are so few "defending" and why do they kill other Iraqi civilians while "defending" their homes?

    How about there is a small fraction of the population that wants to oppress the others and don't care if some of those others get killed in the process. They have been in power for 40 years or so because we put them there and it is about time we cleaned up our mess. The US is finally taking responsibility for putting a madman in power in Iraq and stomping out his fellow travelers that had a piece of the action before.

    As to Iraq threatening people, sure - while the sanctions were in place they were shooting at US and UK planes patrolling the no-fly zone. They had lots of preparations for the sanctions being over with and lots of folks in EU ready and willing to sell them all sorts of weapons and chemicals to wreak havoc on Israel and their other neighbors. Threats? No, of course you are correct - Iraq was no threat to the US as long as we don't trade with anybody and keep on our side of the oceans. That might be the better solution, but I don't see it getting implemented anytime soon. So, yes, they were a threat to the stability of the region and to the credibility of the UN.

    1. Re:Iraqi Civilians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "How about there is a small fraction of the population that wants to oppress the others and don't care if some of those others get killed in the process...The US is finally taking responsibility for putting a madman in power in Iraq..."

      So we'll be bombing Washington DC soon then?

    2. Re:Iraqi Civilians by Macgruder · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, I would only want to point out that the US didn't put a known madmen / dictator in power... He kind of became that way after he was set up.

      From that POV, the USA had every right to take him down, since he backstabbed them and turned to the 'dark side'.

      --
      I'm not crazy,I'm actively irresponsible.
    3. Re:Iraqi Civilians by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      Of course Americans don't want to kill everbody else. Otherwise where is Walmart going to get its overseas slave labor? Americans don't want to kill everybody. They just want them to work for them for nothing.

      --
      What?
  57. WTF is a lipo? by Viol8 · · Score: 1

    Sounds like something an aussie girl would put on before going clubbing.

    1. Re:WTF is a lipo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Lithium Polymer (Li-Poly)

      Cells can be bought here:
      http://www.hobby-lobby.com/kokam.htm

      Thier light weight and high energy density makes them an excelent choice for electric R/C planes and hellis.

      Ripped from some random website:

      The newest and most advanced technology for cellular phone batteries. This brand new chemistry of battery allows for the most compact cells available. Li-Poly batteries are extremely light and in most cases very thin allowing for the highest battery life for the size. Lithium Polymer batteries share all of the benefits of Li-Ion plus can last up to twice as long.

  58. MOD PARENT UP!! by Gamasta · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I wanted to quote that... but looks like I wasn't the only one. It's from Fight Club. I think it says it all.

    If just a few people get their faces burned, we (companies) don't care. If it costs us less than a recall, we don't do it.

    Come on! Is that a nice world to live in? Capitalist scum.

    --
    reason defies logic
    1. Re:MOD PARENT UP!! by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      At least some of these cases involved third party batteries. How exactly is a cell phone company supposed to recall someone else's product?
      I would agree that a company should recall their phones if the phones have caught on fire using batteries supplied or supported by the manufacturer, but I really hate to hold a company liable for someone else's trying to save a few bucks on a third party product.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
  59. Yeah. There are dangers. by dep01 · · Score: 1

    I've seen footage of people at gas stations, using their cellphone while pumping gas, and the air around them erupts in a ball of flame... Scary stuff, man. I've heard of being flamed, but that's just rediculous!

    --
    "hey, could you pass me a paper towel? er.. I mean... DEPLOY ABSORBTION PANEL!"
  60. When it comes to Li-Ion by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

    Never skimp. Always go with the genuine deal.

    I once bought a third-party charger for one of my phones. I returned it in a day because I could tell that it was doing some really funky crap.

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  61. LiPo battery warning from AMA by uid100 · · Score: 1

    The http://www.modelaircraft.org/safetycom.asp/ Academy of Model Aeronautics has a pretty strong waring about improperly handling these battery types.
    Specifically, the higher engery storage capability of LiPo has more potential than NiCad's for catastrofic failure.

    some of the R/C battery manufactures are putting saftey circuits directly into the battery pack, but you still have an issue if you short circuit a LiPo pack - they will smoke.

    Since a cell phone does not need a high rate discarge like R/C applications, pwerhaps a saftey fuse would be in order, built directly into the battery. That way when some keys get jammed into the base of the phone, it doesn't catch fire.

    --
    ...yup...
    1. Re:LiPo battery warning from AMA by LanceUppercut · · Score: 1

      The main problem with LiIon batteries used in cell phones (as opposed to LiPoly batteries AMA is talking about) is that they are 1) hard-cased and give no warning before venting, 2) vent extremely voilently. LiPO batteries are soft-cased (polymer pouch) and usually swell like a sausage before anything bad happens, which both serves as 1) visual warning and 2) provide pressure relief, meaning that when the pouch ruptures the pressure is not as high.

    2. Re:LiPo battery warning from AMA by shadowjk · · Score: 1

      Hm. I have to disagree here. While my actions were no doubt ranging on the border of admissable for submission to the annual darwin awards, I was using an old cellphone battery to power my CD player. The CD player was even older, and had power consumption that made you feel lucky if you got through a single CD on one set of batteries.

      Anyway, the battery pack was not happy. The cells started swelling, and the plastic encasing was shattered at the edges. Needless to say I immediately disconnected it and locked it up for the time being in case it would've already reached critical point.

      On another point, cellphone manufacturers DO print clear directions in the manual. Don't drop the phone, don't get it wet, don't throw it at people who piss you off (popular thing to do here), excess heat is bad for both you and the phone. Seems sane enough.

  62. What a Bunch of Weenies We've Become by Hasai · · Score: 1

    ....To fret about the four-in-a-billion chance that a battery just might go bang! If you really want something to worry about regarding cellphones, how about Suzy the Chlorox-Headed Soccer-Sow careening down the road in her ten-ton dreadnought while fiddling with her phone? Goodness knows I've had a lot more close-shaves from this scenario than I'll ever have with some silly little battery. :P

    --

    Regards;

    Hasai

    1. Re:What a Bunch of Weenies We've Become by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a lot of bitterness there. Your mommy not take you to soccer practice?

    2. Re:What a Bunch of Weenies We've Become by rts008 · · Score: 1

      Hear! Hear! Well said I say! Many times lately I get this urge to check out my car for a bullseye painted on it I wasn't aware of. (BTW I've never FOUND a bullseye, but I suspect that it only appears AFTER I get in and start it up)

      --
      Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
  63. Rise of the Machines... by SmokeHalo · · Score: 0

    From Cyberdyne, a name you know and trust...

    The new T-1000 mobile munitions...er, communications...device combines the latest technology with ergonomic design.

    Try the T-1000...it'll blow you away!

    --
    I'm not good in groups. It's difficult to work in a group when you're omnipotent. - Q
  64. Note by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

    If you RTFA, in all three cases of battery recall/explosion incidents, the companies in question dropped their suppliers like a hot potato and switched to new suppliers.

    In short, the companies did as much as they could to prevent it from ever happening again. Switching suppliers in a short time period is not a small (or cheap) task.

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  65. Exactly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I also work in a cell-phone shop and we do our own repairs. You wouldn't believe it if you saw what people do to their phones.

    Water damage is certainly the leading cause of faults like this, especially in the summer when people take their phones wind surfing and poor beer all over it. And of course they still expect it to work normally and get angry when I tell them that the phone can't be repaired or that the warranty is void.

    But you also have people soldering in different color LEDs, using batteries featuring only chinese lettering, using metal paperclips te wiggle some dirt or small pieces of paper from the charge connector, you name it. And of course any repairs should ALWAYS be under warranty.

    Our costumers (mostly large companies) must have a couple of thousand phones combined, and I have had only ONE (1!!) case where the 'battery became a bit warm'.

    I say the odds are very much against YOUR battery exploding if you just follow the manufacterers recommendations.

    1. Re:Exactly by bitingduck · · Score: 1

      Water damage is certainly the leading cause of faults like this, especially in the summer when people take their phones wind surfing and poor beer all over it.

      Seems like an opportunity to have yet another model-- sealed against water and charged inductively like an electric toothbrush. You can even use it in the shower, but whoever you're talking to will hear only rushing water...

  66. Rapid Disassembly by mr100percent · · Score: 5, Funny

    I remember the delay in getting my phone earlier this year: The press release said the reason for the recall last time was "Kyocera has received four confirmed reports of rapid disassembly."... "Continued use of the phone with the '-05' battery could result in injury in the form of burns due to the battery's rapid disassembly (which may appear as an explosion), or emission of excessive heat."

    So in field of Public Relations objects don't explode, they just rapidly disassemble!!!.....

    1. Re:Rapid Disassembly by DrewCapu · · Score: 1

      I think it's time to call some of my friends who have Kyocera phones and just say repeatedly: "Johnny 5 disassemble! Johnny 5 disassemble!"

    2. Re:Rapid Disassembly by CountrySon · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yes - - and the PR people dissemble. RIMSHOT!

    3. Re:Rapid Disassembly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL...yeah, ranks right up there with "de-orbiting" Russian satellites.

    4. Re:Rapid Disassembly by LanceUppercut · · Score: 2, Informative

      Strictly, technically speaking, batteries do not "explode". There are no explisives in a LiIon battery, i.e. there's noting that can "explode". The technical term for the process is "venting". Pressure builds in the hard-cased battery and eventially it vents through holes specifically provided for this purpose (thes holes are called "vents"). Unfortunately, in a hard-cased battery venting occurs without any observable warning and when the internal gas pressure is rather high and, which creates a loud sound. In some cases it can also be accompanied with expulsion of hot and/or burning electrolyte. It is expected that general public will prefer to refer to this process as an "explosion". The article says the covering vent holes can lead to this "explosion". That's pure nonsense. Vent holes in the battery have no other function but to provide an exit path for internal gases during venting, i.e. when it is already too late.

    5. Re:Rapid Disassembly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So in field of Public Relations objects don't explode, they just rapidly disassemble!!!.....

      Just like Little Boy did over Hiroshima, Japan on 1945-08-06 and Fat Man did over Nagasaki, Japan on 1945-08-09

      In the end, 300,000 people died in the two of the largest incidents of 'rapid disassembly' the world has ever seen.

      Ain't newspeak grand? Eric 'George Orwell' Blair was preniscient when he wrote 1984.

      The military (used to?) call stuff like this 'nuclear yield'. Sounds more benign than 'thermonuclear explosion' which, to me, is a more accurate description.

  67. PSU != cellphone by phorm · · Score: 1

    I don't know about you, but I generally don't hold my PSU up to my face when I'm using my PC. Of course laptops are also a risk, but for those that have died it's usually just a lack of power-on and no fancy sparks or fire.

    A laptop goes off on one's lap could be a danger, but chances are the desktop isn't so much so. I've had plenty of PSU's go, some smoking nicely - usually a blown cap and never anything that was much of a risk to anything outside the box.

  68. Kyocera Profits by Digital_Quartz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Kyocera made about $2.7B US in profit last year. If they say "Our cell phones are dangerous", they'll loose sales. If they instead, let one or two people blow up every year, they only have to pay out a couple million in lawsuit damages each year. Do the math.

    1. Re:Kyocera Profits by colinleroy · · Score: 1

      Take the number of phones in the field, (A), and multiply it by the probable rate of failure, (B), then multiply the result by the average out-of-court settlement, (C). A times B times C equals X...

      If X is less than the cost of a recall, we don't do one.

      --
      blah
  69. Re:Future news TSA bans batteries and beer on flig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    TSA completes calculation (2+2) and determines cell phone and computer batteries pose a greater threat aboard planes than boxcutters of nail clippers. Well maybe not yet, but if trends continue, perhaps.

    It's funny you said that. Last year, on a domestic flight in Canada, I wasn't allowed to carry spare AAA batteries for my ancient palm pilot. They claimed it was a safety hazard. The batteries in the palm pilot were ok though.

  70. Exploding eh? by sameerdesai · · Score: 1

    Is that where they got the idea for that commercial where the guy boasts about this "electric shock" phone and ends up frying his office mate!! ;-)

  71. Nokias by phorm · · Score: 1

    Even the newer Nokias cause some interference. When my gf's went off it used to make the alarm clock pop and stutter. The alarm would actually start buzzing before the phone rang.

    Not sure if it's harmful though, as it could just be your standard interference. Given the proximity of the phone to one's crotch though, the thought of radiation isn't such a good thing.

  72. Not for Butt usage by ipxodi · · Score: 1

    "In retrospect, lighting the match was my big mistake. But I was only trying to retrieve the gerbil." Eric Tomasewski told bemused doctors in the Severe Burns Unit of Salt Lake City Hospital. Tomaszewski, and his homosexual partner, Andrew "Kiki" Farnum, had been admitted for emergency treatment after a felching session had gone seriously wrong. "I pushed a cardboard tube up his rectum and slipped Raggot, our gerbil, in," he explained. "As usual, Kiki shouted out "Armageddon", my cue that he'd had enough. I tried to retrieve Raggot but he wouldn't come out again, so I peered into the tube and struck a match, thinking the light might attract him."

    At a hushed press conference, a hospital spokesman described what happened next. "The match ignited a pocket of intestinal gas and a flame shot out the tube, igniting Mr. Tomaszewski's hair and severely burning his face. It also set fire to the gerbil's fur and whiskers which in turn ignited a larger pocket of gas further up the intestine, propelling the rodent out like a cannonball."

    Tomaszewski suffered second degree burns and a broken nose from the impact of the gerbil, while Farnum suffered first and second degree burns to his anus and lower intestinal tract.

    (Yes, I know it's an Urban Legend -- still funny as all get out though...)

    --
    load "windows7" ,8,1
    1. Re:Not for Butt usage by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      Let's hope that we don't see that one on Mythbusters...

  73. What they really meant... by phorm · · Score: 1

    Is that your phone is considered a consumable. Useful for a limited time, then you should fork over more cash and buy a new one.

    No seriously, as with many other electronic products the return/exchange rates on phones are very high. Many of the things are really quite fragile and over time will severely degrade in performance, battery life, etc.

  74. Your phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your phone a splode!

  75. Re:Yeah. There are dangers. by smellystudent · · Score: 1

    Care to share any of the indisputable footage?

    --
    Predictive text is shiv!
  76. Re:Future news TSA bans batteries and beer on flig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    According to Bruce Schneier in "Beyond Fear", after 9/11, the TSA wanted to ban cigarettes and cigarette lighters as well. Very reasonably, because these lighters contain actual combustible material which can easily be used to create an improvised bomb (I'm not an expert, but I imagine if you blow up a regular rubber baloon with a certain amount of air, and then dump the contents of your lighter in there as well, that you've got a good chance of a big explosion) or to simply set the seat in front of you alight.

    However, the tobacco lobby stepped in, called their friends in senate, congress and white house, and as a result, nail clippers are now banned but cigarette lighters are not.

    I guess the Nail Clipper Association of America needs more lobbyists...

  77. Err yeah. by Charcharodon · · Score: 1
    Well then if we are going to warn people about the phone exploding we should warn them of other things that could happen to them that are of similar odds.

    Warning:

    The use of this device may cause large carniverous fish to attack you while walking down the streat in New York

    . May attract the ledgendary figure known as big foot with cute ring tones which could result in user getting fleas.

    A piece of blue ice may fall from the sky and crush your girlfriend who just happens to be sleeping with your brother at his place

    You may unknowningly discover the lost city of Atlan......

  78. bwahahahaha by ocularDeathRay · · Score: 1, Funny

    excuse me while I call that coworker I hate.... I wonder how long I can keep him on the phone.

    --
    Obama is a twitter sock puppet
  79. WTF? by phoenix321 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    The third comment on the last link scares my brains out. Really. How far has it come that ordinary people write lines along these into ordinary webpages about batteries'n'stuff? What is wrong with the world and its people?

    Read for yourself:

    1/10/2002

    My father served during WW II in Burma India. As an Engineer in the Army building roads and landing strips , he told this story many times. A Jeep came in to Motor Pool where he was working that day with ignition problems and he proceeded to check the battery first . Simply hooking a tester to the battery caused an explosion.

    The only thing that saved his eyes was the prescription glasses he was wearing , with fast action from some very well trained Medics his face survived too but , just because they were RIGHT THERE and knew what to do !!!

    Master Sgt. . Willett M. Bruner went on to fight many battles while preparing the way for many more G.I.'s to join him and many others in securing our freedom during this war.

    God rest the soul of Master Sgt. Willett M. Bruner and every other person who has made the ultimate sacrifice for our Freedom .


    Col. James L. Bruner


    Emphasis mine. This is fascism. Today.

  80. accidents? by khold · · Score: 1

    Wait, how do we know that these cell phone "explosions" are accidents? Maybe Israel has hijacked the cellphones and is trying to assasinate everyone now.

    --
    rm -rf sig
  81. Fear not! by RealProgrammer · · Score: 2, Funny

    Simply don your Slashdot-approved tin hat (available now at OSDN.com), as it has built-in protection from cell phone radiation. Make sure to use the supplied grounding strap, affixing the free end firmly to the steel pad on the bottom of your shoe.

    I've realized why the cell phone makers aren't concerned about random explosions. It just saves their users from succombing to brain cancer. Humane, in a way, and cheaper to litigate.

    --
    sigs, as if you care.
  82. Big deal. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had toys as a kid in the 70s that were more dangerous. We actually wanted them to blow up, and at times we made them blow up. Dogs ran around bitting us and we thought it was fun. We rode our bikes, crashed and laughed. I wish I had a Pinto.

    Instead, I'm going to invest in a helmet company. I won't be happy, but I'll make a killing.

  83. Hit by meteorites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "I've never heard of anyone getting hit by a meteorite"

    Obviously you've never heard of Google either.

    History of meteorite strikes

    Girl hit by meteorite?

    Ask (aka annoy) Cornell's Astro dept

  84. I got a good one! by jcostantino · · Score: 1
    How about the scene in Tommy Boy where Tommy is talking to a potential client and the client mentions his brake pads don't have a warranty printed on the box but the Zalinski pads do?

    Just because a phone has a warranty doesn't mean that it's going to be defect free. It's up to the manufacturer to ensure that the components and assembly is up to a high enough standard to produce a quality product.

    I suppose we could always go back to bag phones with sealed lead acid batteries, those were mostly safe. You certainly wouldn't hear about one exploding in someone's pants pocket.

    I'm totally agreeing with this whole thread - nothing is 100% safe but there are acceptable ratios of defects.

    --
    Reviews with a twist! http://www.sardonicbastard.com
  85. And this is a problem because.... by megarich · · Score: 1

    Lets see, I just turned off my cell phone, pulled out the battery and now i read:

    "CAUTION: Please read the user's guide before using the battery as it may cause fire, overheating and other hazards"

    As boring as they are, they do provide manuals for a reason.

  86. You are the same guy by Uptown+Joe · · Score: 0

    "Shouldn't cellphone companies be making people aware of the hazards of usage?" ... that is ruining childhoods across the world by forcing kids to wear seat belts and helmets when riding bikes. I hate you.

  87. Re:Spo86e by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    god you're a fucking moron.

  88. wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    microwave's "significant effect" on biological matter is simply due to the fact that most biological matter is largely comprised of asymetrical molecules--such as water. big deal. warms up matter? yes. cancerous? no.

    you know how the idea of using microwaves was found? a candy bar in a guy's pocket melted because of the waves. people have been exposed to (low) levels of microwaves for years without any adverse effects.

    in my opinion, it's foolish to think that these electronics are a hazard to our bodies due to their radiation. sorta like people who believe that living next to a coal-based power plant is safer than living next to nuclear power plant.

  89. what about digi cams and portable computers? by scharkalvin · · Score: 1

    Cell phones aren't the only devices using Li Ion batteries. Many new laptop and handheld computers as well as digicams also use them. Why havn't we heard reports of exploding cameras and computers? Could the microwave rf emitted by cellphones be cooking the batteries?

    1. Re:what about digi cams and portable computers? by shadowjk · · Score: 1

      Simply because in comparison to cellphones, laptops, handheld computers and digicams are quite rare.

      Digicams not AS rare, but most, if not all, that I have seen, used regular AA NiMh rechargeables.

  90. Keep Reading by PingPongBoy · · Score: 1

    Instructions for reassembly were also included.

    --
    Know your pads. One time pad: good for cryptography. Two timing pad: where to take your mistress.
  91. Re:Yeah. There are dangers. by Archangel_Azazel · · Score: 2, Informative

    If anyone is familiar with the show in the US called "Myth Busters" they did this exact thing. They tried and tried to get the thing to explode to no avail...so they put it in a plexi-glass like container and filled it with a mix of gas fumes and oxygen and called the cell, STILL NO explosion. the only damn way THEY could get the thing to go off was to put an actual spark in the chamber with it.

    There are *so* many things that can go wrong with cellphones that if I were to see one exploding I'd first ask "what was the condition of the phone prior to the explosion?" People are STUPID...I used to do tech support, I KNOW this :)

    Asmodeus

    --
    Your mind is like a parachute. It works best when it's been opened.
  92. gives a whole new meaning... by utexaspunk · · Score: 1

    ...to the phrase "blowin' up my celly"

  93. I wish they would ALL blow up by _randy_64 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Without harming the user, of course!

    But I am just SO tired of cell phones. People want to drive while they talk on them, but they really can't - swerving, slowing down in traffic, whatever - dangerous and a pain in the ass. Not to mention the way the signal drops out, no matter what the user is doing. I am SO tired of talking to people on their cell phones and losing the connection, or one of us not being able to hear the other.

    We got along before we had cellphones, I really think we could continue to. Personally I don't want to have people being able to contact me every moment of the day, nor do I need to take it into the grocery store to send my wife a picture of the damn steaks I want to buy. For some people they are literally life savers, but for the most part they are intrusive and rude - as are the people who use them everywhere.

    Cell phones, just say NO!

    --
    I mod down all the "free iPod"-sig losers.
  94. Re:Future news TSA bans batteries and beer on flig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My favorite anti-skyjack weapon of self defense is a garrot. It'e really easy to make. All you have to carry is a small coil of stainless steel fishing leader (piano wire). A guitar string works too. You can secure the ends of the wire to a pair of tennis shoes, or a couple of big keys from your keyring. I carry a pair of big keys. Garrot using very thin wire is fast and deadly. A simple parry and you can have it around the neck of someone making a frontal assualt before he knows what's happened to him and a couple of quick twists and he won't be able to get it off in the short time he has to live.

  95. Re:Yeah. There are dangers. by The+Cisco+Kid · · Score: 1

    I can vouch for this - I saw the same episode.

    Merely using a cellphone isnt going to cause any explosions, unless there is already something wrong with the phone (eg, im sure if the phone *itself* exploded, due to some battery problem like the ones this article describes, while someone is filling their tank with gas, it might cause a problem)

  96. Some users bring it upon themselves... by lxt · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...a friend of mine took his phone out with him in a heavy storm, and it got rather water damaged. He decided he'd "dry out the phone" by taking the battery out, and placing it on his radiator...luckily, we were all in the room at the time, and able to enlighten him somewhat...

  97. Cost benefit analysis .... by gstoddart · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Despite what the storey headline says, the cell-phone industry is not well served by telling everyone that their products could explode and cause injury.

    So they're not going to make sure to tell consumers about it unless they have no choice. And until they can be shown it really happens with their products which are used as designed, they may not believe it.

    In reality, the way industry will make this decision is a cost-benefit analysis. In the airline industry, for example, wether or not to do a refit/new safety measure/etc is defined by a formula which measures how often it's likely to happen, and how much it costs if it did.

    Using an average industry payout of $2mil/death (I think that's close), a $20 million upgrade will only happen if 10 people are expected to die from it. If the math says the upgrade is cheaper than paying for deaths, it gets done. If 3 people might die over 20 years, then the math says it's cheaper to let people die and pay settlements than to make the change.

    It would be naive to think that the cell-phone industry is going to start running around saying "oh my god, they exploded".

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  98. Sorry to reply to myself by abulafia · · Score: 1
    Another example: More children drown every year in 5 gallon buckets than due to guns.

    Obviously sloppy language. Sorry. I meant "More children drown every year in 5 gallon buckets than die due to guns."

    --
    I forget what 8 was for.
  99. True story - cell phone turns on when off for me.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I work in radio and carry a cell phone around with me into the studio every day. I shut the phone off BEFORE I enter the control room, because, well, I don't want it to distract me or the host or the engineer.

    However, even with the phone off, it causes interference. Sometimes, lets say someone is attempting to call me, but the phone is off, feedback and noise will interefere with the audio monitors in the control room! You wont hear it on air, but you will hear it in your headphones... thus, the host hears it, we hear it, but you, the listener, have no clue as to the sound effects we are inadvertently getting in the studio. It has a distinct sounding RING to it, but only for about 5 seconds. I'm guessing this is the signal sent out to see if my phone is indeed on or off, and then appropriately forward it to my voicemail. It's an older Panasonic phone, and I still haven't learned my lesson and bring it into the studio anyway.

    After reading this article, I'm not sure if it is even safe to carry it in my pocket as I normally do ....

  100. You can avoid this by Cynikal · · Score: 1

    If you want the non exploding phone attachment from sprint, its only $5/month with a 2 year agreement, and its free for the first 2 months.

  101. Re:Yeah. There are dangers. by rts008 · · Score: 1

    As several others have also posted: Myth Busted! Too bad it wasn't true though, Darwin's List at work I say. For decades we all have known that electrical devices in operation have the habit of sparking on occasion. Using an electric device while pumping gas? WTF?!!? These morons should leave their cell phone in the car and just "flick their Bic(TM)" instead-much better chances of fireball!

    --
    Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
  102. get real by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you know, your technical knowledge does make me think you really ARE a cell phone store clerk.

    maybe we can save $$$ in the electronics industry by using mocha lattes instead of solder now.

  103. Cell Phone Addiction - just say NO!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "It took my son two months to decide to even be near a cell phone," said his mother, Cris. "But he needs one." (From the Yahoo!!!! article)


    What a load of crap. The kid does not need a cell phone. I survived adolescence without said device, and I believe that several billion others have as well.


    It is good that he is getting over this and moving on with his life. But he should try to get a real life and not become dependant on this particular convenience.


    Anti-phone curmudgeon

  104. replacement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if you look carefully, kyocera was NOT REPLACING PHONES, they were replacing batteries. same goes for their current replacement program
    http://www.kyocera-wireless.com/battery.htm

  105. I had a car battery explode by ericdano · · Score: 1
    I swear, back in 1989, while cutting classes (Teacher strike), I was cruising on the freeway going to Tower Recorders, and I heared a BANG, and then the car lost all power. I was able to get to the right, and tried to restart it. Nada. Opened the hood, and the battery had exploded. It looked just like the pictures here. Battery acid was all over the place. Wish I had a camera to take a picture.

    My auto mech had NEVER seen this happen. And we could never figure out what caused it.

    Car was a 1978 Toyota Corolla Hatchback (woohoo).

    Strange stuff, but I have seen it happen before....

    --
    It's either on the beat or off the beat, it's that easy.
    I moderate therefore I rule!
    --
  106. What's next? by sl0wp0is0n · · Score: 1

    You can't take your cellphone on an airplane? OR Al-Qaeda making a secret deal with Kyocera to buy all their stock? crazy!

    --
    My other dog is a Wienerschnitzel.
  107. New product by eStragand · · Score: 1

    How long until a company starts marketing a "cellphone helmet" to protect users from these terrible attacks? It'll sell as well as those "block cancer-causing cellphone radiation" patches.

  108. Go Back To NiCd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NiCds didn't explode due to the smallest problem. Some counterfit batteries are also either NiCd or NiMh anyway. By the time LiIon came out we were able to go back to NiCd (digital phones).

  109. brace yourself for this one by TheLittleJetson · · Score: 1

    Now, when the hazard comes from regular use of the item, like... talking on your cell phone, well if said phone can explode, or "vent superheated gases" on me, I think I would like to know.

    Anything with a battery, yes, ANYTHING WITH A BATTERY can explode and do the same. I've seen a gameboy in use for hours on end have its alkaline AA's explode. There's been recalls on laptops where batteries explode / overheat. It's not very common, but it happens. It definately sucks for the consumer, and if it happened to me I would definately pressure my provider into getting me expensive phone for free or something, but not burden the legal system with such petty bullshit.

  110. Haven't we done this before...? by Anarrin · · Score: 1

    Yet, cellphone makers claim that such incidents are too rare to care about.

    Some of you may be familiar with the Therac-25 incidents, but those were a perfect examples as to why "occational" mishaps cannot be ignored.

    The Therac-25 was an inovative cancer treatment machine that shot electrons at the cancerous area. There were very few machines in the country, and they were quite buggy but over 20,000 treatments were successfully administered before any issues occured.

    The machine would usually deliver approximatly 200 rads to a patient. However during an unpredictable malfunction it shot over 15,000 rads at the patient. The first women that had recieved such a large amount of radiation had a hole burned through her chest... It took 2 years, and multiple similar accidents resulting in death, for the machine to be taken out of use.

    If we agree that this whole cell phone explosion issue can be disregarded, aren't we allowing for worse things to occur in the future?
    If anyone wants to read more about the Therac-25, it can be found here: http://www.ccnr.org/fatal_dose.html

  111. The News is worthless... by evilviper · · Score: 1

    This is what pisses me off about news these days. I just saw a news story about this problem on TV, and the anchor said very clearly that it's exclusively a problem with counterfeit batteries. And then, the cell-phone company spokesman followed that up by saying in his interview that it's a problem that is likely to only harm a handful of people.

    Did any of these thousands of news-people speak up and say that these are blatant lies? No. The News, today, is 50% corporate press releases, and political BS. The other 50% is just rumors and banal details about anyone remotely famous.

    If I hear another 10-minute long interview of some actress complaining non-stop about how hard it was preparing for a minor stunt in their latest movie, I just might throw something heavy through the TV screen.

    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  112. Re:Future news TSA bans batteries and beer on flig by Oddly_Drac · · Score: 1

    "If you're packing the battery with more and more volatile chemicals that may explode to get that power, it's quite right."

    Okay, well I'm going to take a seat, and you're going to explain the circumstances where the volatile chemicals are being packed into space to create BATTERY BOMBS.

    No, seriously, take your time. This should be good.

    --
    Oddly Draconis
    Too cynical to live, too stubborn to die.
  113. Needs to be said. by slappyjack · · Score: 1

    "It took my son two months to decide to even be near a cell phone," said his mother, Cris. "But he needs one."

    Thirteen years old and he needs a cell phone?

    Hey Lady, fuck you.

    Teach him to carry an extra couple of quarters in his pocket.

  114. UK - Jessops 2000mAh NiMH returns by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
    A couple of weeks ago I had a Jessops (own brand) 2000 mAh NiMH (Nickel- Metal Hydride) cell explode in the charger after about 5 hours of a 15 hour charge. Totalled the cell, the charger and made a stain on the recently-painted wall.

    As usual, excellent service from Jessops staff - immediate acceptance of there being a problem; replacement of entire cell set (I had brought a pack of 4 cells) and charger) and offer of recompense appopriate to the damage caused (I asked them to send it to a charity of their choice). Jessops are considering a recall, but have already taken the offending stock off their store shelves.

    The offending cells can be identified by a WHITE plastic surround to the positive contact; the replacement stock has a BLACK plastic surround to the anode. Take your old stock in for replacement.

    TTBOMK, this only applies to Jessops own-brand 2000 mAh NiMH cells. But if you know the manufacturer (the plastic anode surrounds are quite distinctive), then they may have other lines with similar problems.
    Jessops website

    --
    Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"