Slashdot Mirror


How Company Employees Use The Web

An anonymous reader submits "VisitorVille Intelligence has released information on how employees of several large companies use the web based on their monitoring of thousands of websites. Presumably using IP address blocks, they group company employees together to produce some interesting facts and figures: Microsoft employees use Google for their searches 66% of the time, but MSN Search only 20% of the time, and Firefox is their second most popular browser behind Internet Explorer 6's whopping 98.76% share. Google employees use Google as their search engine 100% of the time and 21% use a Mozilla or Firefox browser. Apple employees like Google best and 68% use Safari. 91% of Internap employees use Mozilla or Firefox, Deutsche Telekom AG employees are the biggest users of Linux, and 39% of Sun Microsystems employees use SunOS. Other groups of interest to Slashdot readers include: The White House, the United Nations, The New York Times, Red Hat, and IBM."

415 comments

  1. Slashdot employees by fembots · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It's nice to see slashdot employees don't do anything on the internet :) Full company list is here by the way.

    And IBM is using Windows exclusively?

    I wonder why it doesn't show the top 5/10 visited sites.

    1. Re:Slashdot employees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I work at a mainframe datacenter, and our local IBM hardware CE's told me this year all the CE's windows laptops will be replaced with linux-only laptops. :D

      also the hardware maintenance consoles for the mainframes from OS/2 warp, and some of the service consoles for other high end ibm hardware are pc's running AIX =/

    2. Re:Slashdot employees by Nutria · · Score: 1

      pc's running AIX

      How can a PC run AIX?

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    3. Re:Slashdot employees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How can a PC run AIX?

      We have PC-sized RISC machines.

    4. Re:Slashdot employees by Nutria · · Score: 1

      We have PC-sized RISC machines.

      Then that begs the question: what's a PC?

      With the power/price of modern x86-based systems, and the rise of Linux, the line is definitely blurred, but still, a desktop-sized box running AIX is a workstation, not a PC.

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    5. Re:Slashdot employees by Richard+Dick+Head · · Score: 1
      Hell, PC's, big iron, its all the same :D

      Speaking of which, to the tune of In The Ghetto by Elvis:

      As the Phillips-heads fly......
      In a temperture controled Chicago morn,
      A poor little cubicle is born,

      In the Datacenter Ghetto..... x2

      And big iron cried.......
      Cause if there's one thing that she didn't need
      Its another data terminal to feed,

      In the Datacenter Ghetto...... x2

      Oh, people don't you hear the clicks
      This hog's about to shit the bit
      And were gonna lose all our work some day

      Take a look at you and me
      this thing's our company
      Do we simply turn our heads
      and keep playing solitaire?........(YES!)

      Well the heads start to fly.....
      As a busy big box that needs some TLC
      Melted down all the way to the Chinese

      In the Datacenter Ghetto.....

      And the anger burns
      Everyone was yelling and all uptight
      Yeah we knew we were gonna be up all night...

      In the Datacenter Ghetto.....

      That mightnight desperation,
      We sorta slipped away
      Bought a case or two, came back in an hour
      she sorta works now, but she doesn't get far...

      As the morning crowd gathers 'round......
      Well, just as looks like she's starting to work
      there's a big flash of light, some smoke, and a jerk

      In the Datacenter Ghetto.....

      And big iron dies,
      On a temperature controlled Chigago morn,
      Another little linux box is born...

      In the Datacenter Ghetto.....
    6. Re:Slashdot employees by Erik+Hensema · · Score: 1

      In my (obviously stupid) definition, a PC is a computer with in hardware is designed for use by a single person.

      A mini is a machine designed in hardware for use by multiple persons. Note that with dual video cards and ps2 keyboard/mouse and usb keyboard/mouse, you can turn a Linux PC into a mini ;-)

      Legally, 'PC' is probably trademarked or something by IBM, meaning an Intel 8086 compatible machine, including, bios, memory layout, ISA bus (yes, every PC has an ISA bus, even though I doesn't nescesarily have ISA slots), etc.

      --

      This is your sig. There are thousands more, but this one is yours.

    7. Re:Slashdot employees by pramodk · · Score: 1

      Yes, pretty much everyone (including unix admins like myself) have to run the SOE (Standard Operating Environment) - which is currently Windows XP. Though a lot of people use Firefox rather than IE.

      There are some pretty good reasons why we use XP (client site requirements mostly), but that doesn't stop the unix folks complaining about it.

    8. Re:Slashdot employees by siphi · · Score: 0

      No, M$ made up the term PC.

      --
      Sig (appended to the end of comments you post, 120 chars)
    9. Re:Slashdot employees by slaker · · Score: 1

      A long, long time ago - early 90s-ish - IBM did make an x86 version of AIX.
      I dimly recall seeing a couple PS/2s running it in a datacenter once.

      --
      -- I wanna decide who lives and who dies - Crow T. Robot, MST3K
  2. In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    85% of Slashdot users use windows, and 60% still use internet explorer.

    1. Re:In other news... by sqrt(2) · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But most are smart enough to use it safely, unlike your average Windows/IE user.

      --
      If you build it, nerds will come. Soylentnews.org
    2. Re:In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously now, isn't it time for /. to open up OS and browser stats?

    3. Re:In other news... by Peyna · · Score: 4, Funny

      But most are smart enough to use it safely, unlike your average Windows/IE user.

      But abstinence (Not using Windows/IE) is the only truly safe way.

      --
      What?
    4. Re:In other news... by LPetrazickis · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'd say that abstinence would be more like unplugging the network cable, mate.:)

      --
      Is this a sigs-optional kind of place? 'Cause I am totally down with that if you know what I mean.
    5. Re:In other news... by AvitarX · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, but I bet the average /. reader visits plenty of p0rn, not particularly safe with IE.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    6. Re:In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      . 5% when Cmdr Taco tries to click on the link before posting the story. 3% when Cmdr Taco tries to click on the link before posting the story. 2% when Cmdr Taco tries to click on the link before posting the story

      I couldn't help but notice that you seem to have duplicates for Cmdr Taco. Unfortunately, they differ in trivial, but imporant ways that make it hard to trust your data.

      It is imperative that slashdot check all facts before posting for accuracy, and to avoid costly duplication. I am certain that with the examples and leadership of such editors as Cmdr Taco, you too will reach their lofty standards.

    7. Re:In other news... by drsmithy · · Score: 2, Interesting
      But most are smart enough to use it safely, unlike your average Windows/IE user.

      You think ? I'd be surprised if even 10% of /.'s IE-users aren't running as an admin, or are running their browser with a dedicated limited-rights account.

    8. Re:In other news... by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeh, not using windows would be like losing the "no-rubber sex with $2 hookers" habit.

    9. Re:In other news... by mkettler · · Score: 1

      By "using internet explorer safely" do you mean using it as a punchline?

      sorry, couldn't resist that, it's too funny to me :)

      --
      -Matt
    10. Re:In other news... by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Quite. Most of us have very little choice as to what we can use.I work in a company that uses Windows for all email etc. Some internal packages are IE based and won't work with other browsers. As a result I have not been bothered to set up a different browser etc. At home I use Linux and Opera.

      What is interesting though is that almost 20% of MS employees run non-IE. I expect a good percentage of MS employees live the faith and are Windows/IE zealots, I expect MS corporate websites are only IE friendly. It's quite suprising to see such a high % use non-IE. I wonder how many run Linux desktops?

      --
      Engineering is the art of compromise.
    11. Re:In other news... by jericho4.0 · · Score: 1
      It would be interesting for /. to do a lot of things. But if you havn't noticed, /. hasn't 'done' anything geeky-cool in a long time.

      --
      "A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
    12. Re:In other news... by pummer · · Score: 1

      That's because it's fucking annoying to run as a limited user. You can't install shit. It's not worth the trouble, if you know what you're doing.

    13. Re:In other news... by drsmithy · · Score: 2, Informative
      That's because it's fucking annoying to run as a limited user.

      No more than running as a regular user on anything else is.

      You can't install shit.

      "Run As".

      It's not worth the trouble, if you know what you're doing.

      Well I certainly "know what I'm doing" and I've been running NT with a regular user account since early 1996. It's not particularly difficult and it's not particularly annoying (certainly no more than anything else).

    14. Re:In other news... by Irashtar · · Score: 0

      nope, you can still get them. you need to unplug ALL the cables

    15. Re:In other news... by Curtman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You can't install shit.

      You're not supposed to be able to. Thats the point.

      It's not worth the trouble, if you know what you're doing

      If you know what you're doing, its no trouble.

    16. Re:In other news... by BicycloHexane · · Score: 0

      A lot of us are stuck on company laptops/desktops where we are forced to use windows.

    17. Re:In other news... by sqrt(2) · · Score: 1

      What the hell is that in your sig? It reads like the ramblings of a madman.

      I am wiser than any god or scientist, for I have squared the circle and cubed Earth's sphere, thus I have created 4 simultaneous separate 24 hour days within a 4-corner (as in a 4-corner classroom) rotation of Earth. See for yourself the absolute proof.

      wtf!?

      --
      If you build it, nerds will come. Soylentnews.org
    18. Re:In other news... by karniv0re · · Score: 1

      85% of Slashdot users use windows, and 60% still use internet explorer.

      Though it may look bad in statistics, a lot of it is due to unavoidable situations, such as surfing at work, or on public terminals. At my school, we have lots of dumb terminals with IE and WinXP. It's easy to just jump on one and check /. At work, I occasionally develop under Windows, so /. receives some more visits.

      I will admit, however, that 85%/60% are pretty high numbers for a learned crowd. I just hope that a lot of people are surfing at work or school!

    19. Re:In other news... by LPetrazickis · · Score: 1

      Well, you can still get raped if you are abstinent.

      --
      Is this a sigs-optional kind of place? 'Cause I am totally down with that if you know what I mean.
    20. Re:In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fucking Posers.

    21. Re:In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most people here don't have a choice in what their parents installed on the computer in their basement.

    22. Re:In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When signal_11 and cyborg_monkey were here, it was interesting

      Sig is still around, he ditched his old account and I believe he's now SIGALRM.

    23. Re:In other news... by superpulpsicle · · Score: 1

      Speaking of windows, I'd like to see the same research done for OS. I know a huge portion of employees at SUN use windows. I wonder if any employees at M$ use solaris or linux.

    24. Re:In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I work at MS.

      I use WinAMP instead of WMP, partially because AVS visualizations rock, and when I mentioned something about WMP's poor ones to someone from the media division, he essentially told me to download the developer's kit and write some if I want them. Like, hello?

      I use Firefox, because I love the tabbed browsing (started using Mozilla before coming to work at MS), and knowing I don't have to worry about ActiveX compromises is nice, even if I stick to web sites that I know are safe.

      Yes, the corp websites are designed completely for IE, and I suspect few would work well with Firefox. But I don't use Firefox for internal stuff, since I still have IE. There's a lot of useful stuff there that demonstrates that ActiveX has a lot of great value.

    25. Re:In other news... by hobuddy · · Score: 1

      Am I still a virgin if I've only used WiFi?

      --
      Erlang.org: wow
    26. Re:In other news... by Spetiam · · Score: 1

      I think he intends "wtf!?" to be the proper reaction to his sig (i.e., it's a joke). If not... I think I don't want to know what he's smoking.

    27. Re:In other news... by thoth · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I run my Windows box as a non-admin. It is a bit more inconvenient switching over to the admin account or using run as, but the fact is, not everything works properly anyway.

      For example, I have a few ebooks in Microsoft Reader format. Thanks to some activation screwup, one group of books in only readable from the administrator account. Trying to activate from my regular account fails... with the mysterious and false "can't access network" message. Translation: our code is hosed and we have a spurious message, or we can't install the needed bits due to permission screw ups.

      Anyway, the whole thing has made me lose confidence in Microsoft DRM.

    28. Re:In other news... by Mitsoid · · Score: 1

      Linux is like a Condom, safer 99% of the time.. but that 1% can screw ya for months! (unless you can rollback to backup! Thank goodness for the morning after tapes!)

    29. Re:In other news... by iwrigley · · Score: 5, Funny

      The fact that you read Slashdot is probably more indicative of that than the fact that you only use WiFi...

    30. Re:In other news... by Elladan · · Score: 2, Funny

      You... had... confidence... in... Microsoft... DRM?!

      The mind boggles.

    31. Re:In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey butt clown- only 1.14% of MS employees run non-IE. But I expect this kind of retardedness from masturbating /. monkeys like you. Loser.

    32. Re:In other news... by EnronHaliburton2004 · · Score: 1

      You're not supposed to be able to. Thats the point.

      Welcome new apartment tenant, I'm your landlord. Here's the kitchen. Please don't plug in any appliances. By the way, the stove might blow up.

    33. Re:In other news... by Curtman · · Score: 1

      I think you mean:

      Welcome, I'm your landlord. Don't try to fix the furnace yourself you idiot, thats why we have a caretaker.

    34. Re:In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ha! Fool! You are too brainstupid to understand the meaning of the Time Cube

    35. Re:In other news... by RichardX · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Ahh, Timecube :)
      It basically IS the ramblings of a madman.. What I've never figured out is whether he's a genuine nutcase, or just a very dedicated troll. There was even an interview with him on a TV show some time back - there's torrents of that floating around somewhere. Try googling "timecube interview"

      If you like that, another favourite net crank is SOLLOG - try googling him, and be sure to check out the wikipedia article

      --
      Curiosity was framed. Ignorance killed the cat.
    36. Re:In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Actually, most employees at sun do NOT use Windows. It is not supported by Sun's IT department and Sun has not provided Windows machines to employees for several years now. Also, MSIE is not supported. Every employee - including the security persons at the front desks of each lobby - use Sun hardware and Solaris. Laptops are obviously going to be Windows. Especially if they're sales guys, but engineers tend to buy Apple laptops at Sun and use OSX. People using VPNs from home, obviously might use Windows more often than what they use on their desk at work.

      If a "huge portion of employees at Sun use windows", it's not out of some mandate. Official policy at Sun is that Windows, Outlook and MSIE are unsupported and not reccomended - especially for security reasons. The only exceptions I have seen tend to be engineers who need to compile, debug and be familiar with Sun software on the Windows platform.

    37. Re:In other news... by Nikker · · Score: 1

      ooohhh abstinence of IE ....

      That makes better sence ....

      *duck*

      --
      A loop, by its nature, continues. If that didn't make sense, start reading this sentence again.
    38. Re:In other news... by 404notfound · · Score: 1

      Nah. That'd be a vasectomy.

    39. Re:In other news... by caino59 · · Score: 1

      hey, i get my pr0n with firefox!

      oh wait...no I don't...
      I uh...

      I use firefox but not the pr0n stuff!

    40. Re:In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously, lots of employees at M$ use Linux. They had to buy $16.6M
      of SCOsource licenses didn't they :-> Even with zero discount, that
      means they must have at least 23,748 Linux systems, right?

    41. Re:In other news... by killjoe · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "You're not supposed to be able to. Thats the point."

      No that's not the point. I can install software both on my linux system an on my mac without being root. I just install it into my home directory.

      On the mac if I want to install it for everybody I drag the icon to the applications folder. The Mac then asks me for the username and the password of an admin user and it's done.

      run as does not even compare. Sorry.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    42. Re:In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My gf is a $2 hooker and she is offended that you think she would agree to no-rubber sex.

    43. Re:In other news... by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1

      Nope, that doesn't work. I -am- the caretaker of -my- computer.

      The truth of the matter is, running as an unlimited user is perfectly safe if you don't run anything w/o knowing what it is.

    44. Re:In other news... by KiloByte · · Score: 1

      Wrong, your parent is right. Who says CmdrTaco would give up after the first attempt?

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    45. Re:In other news... by D'Sphitz · · Score: 1

      if all of the r33t people left, why are you still here? because it's trendy?

    46. Re:In other news... by Dominic_Mazzoni · · Score: 2, Informative

      No more than running as a regular user on anything else is.

      Clearly you've never used Mac OS X. Apple got it right. You always run as a normal user, it's impossible to log in as "root". However, every operation that requires root priveleges simply asks for your password. Want to drag a file to a folder that you don't have permissions in? A dialog box pops up: "The item 'X' could not be moved because 'StartupItems' cannot be modified" with two buttons: OK and Authenticate. Click Authenticate, type your password, and you're set.

      Programs that require doing several operations in a row as root use a special "padlock" Mac OS X widget. Click it to authenticate once, then you can do a series of operations as root.

      Even on Linux, this is also rarely a problem because people tend to either install programs on the command line (in which case it's easy to pop up a root terminal for that purpose), or else they use a package manager to install everything, which makes it easy.

      But on Windows, installers are .exe files. When you double-click on an installer, the installer basically never checks to see if it has permissions. It just tries to install and then fails with a cryptic error message if you weren't logged in as an admin. Why the heck doesn't it just pop up a password dialog? I understand that "Run As..." isn't that much trouble, but try teaching your mom to install software that way; it's just not intuitive!

      Don't forget the dozens of Windows programs that simply won't run unless you're logged in as admin.

    47. Re:In other news... by Curtman · · Score: 1

      I can install software both on my linux system an on my mac without being root. I just install it into my home directory.

      Not on my machines. /home is mounted noexec for that reason.

    48. Re:In other news... by Curtman · · Score: 1

      Nope, that doesn't work. I -am- the caretaker of -my- computer.

      You also own your computer (probably). GP was making a stupid analogy between an apartment he doesn't own, and a computer that he does. In that case the administrator is analogous to the caretaker.

      In the case of your own computer, you should be free to take chances, and do all kinds of stupid things if you so choose. You can pay someone to fix it after it blows up too.

    49. Re:In other news... by TiggsPanther · · Score: 1
      Though it may look bad in statistics, a lot of it is due to unavoidable situations, such as surfing at work, or on public terminals.

      Very true. Although I msotly use Linux at home and only use Firefox I don't have the choice at work. Granted I use Firefox here, but my machine here is a Windows XP box and I have no choice in the matter.

      Seeing that I also do most of my Slashdot browsing at work and very little at home (read most of what I want by the time I get home) it means that I'd register as a "Windows User" in Slashdot logs, despite me mainly being a Linux user.

      I will admit, however, that 85%/60% are pretty high numbers for a learned crowd. I just hope that a lot of people are surfing at work or school!

      It's also possible that some Slashdotters who use non-IE browsers might spoof their User Agent string. Especially seeing that there are more sites that claim to be IE-specific (but filter on browser) than actually are IE-specific.

      --
      Tiggs
      "120 chars should be enough for everyone..."
    50. Re:In other news... by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      I hate to break your bubble but the average slashdot reader is as stupid and unknowing as anyone.

      the biggest danger is when you THINK you can use it safely, but can't...

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    51. Re:In other news... by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1

      My gf is a $2 hooker and she occasionnally agrees to "no-rubber" sex, but she is offended that you are comparing her to a Windows user surfing the Web with IE6!

    52. Re:In other news... by Zorilla · · Score: 2, Funny

      and when I mentioned something about WMP's poor ones to someone from the media division, he essentially told me to download the developer's kit and write some if I want them. Like, hello?

      See, open source and MS have much in common after all! Want to comment about it? Write a response your own damn self! :)

      --

      It would be cool if it didn't suck.
    53. Re:In other news... by fishbot · · Score: 1

      The truth of the matter is, running as an unlimited user is perfectly safe if you don't run anything w/o knowing what it is.

      Correct. Absolutely. Now, open up Task Manager, switch to the Processes tab and tell me what all those processes are and what they're doing. How about Iap.exe, or hkcmd.exe, or ssexp.exe.

      They're all perfectly safe and known code, aren't they? After all, you trust them enough to run them as with admin rights all the time...

    54. Re:In other news... by Deslack · · Score: 0

      IE.

      Running IE as a normal user is (a bit) safer than Administrator -- quite a number of those spyware and malware _will_ attempt to try to takeover everything. And if even one succeeds, just delete the account and its files, and start anew.

      However, I don't recommend IE at all.

      --
      .sigs are useless; it doesn't protect you from imposters.
    55. Re:In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some of us read and post from work where we have no control over the equipment we use.

    56. Re:In other news... by Nurgled · · Score: 1

      You can fix most applications by massaging the permissions on the install directory or certain files. I've had to do this a number of times so that my family members can run the budget PC games they buy, since I don't let them run as admin constantly. (I'm not around often enough to clear up the mess that would result.)

    57. Re:In other news... by bynary · · Score: 1

      It is not impossible to login as root. It's easy to do. Just don't blame me when you hose your system.

      http://www.osxfaq.com/Tutorials/Root_User_Creation /index.ws

      --
      http://www.bynarystudio.com
    58. Re:In other news... by bynary · · Score: 1

      "You can't install shit."

      You did install Windows. That's about as close to shit as it comes.

      --
      http://www.bynarystudio.com
    59. Re:In other news... by DenDave · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Actually I have been using Mac OS X now for over a week since I dumped the last windows machine.. I have also been running as root.. it works just fine.. you just need to enable the account.. http://noether.vassar.edu/~myers/help/apple/Enable Root.html

      --
      -if at first you don't succeed, stay the heck away from paragliding.
    60. Re:In other news... by Politburo · · Score: 1

      But on Windows, installers are .exe files. When you double-click on an installer, the installer basically never checks to see if it has permissions. It just tries to install and then fails with a cryptic error message if you weren't logged in as an admin. Why the heck doesn't it just pop up a password dialog?

      You couldn't be further from the truth. An installer doesn't have to be a .exe. It could be a .msi, which is a Windows Install Package. Many installs do check permissions (it is the job of the application developer to do this, not the installer software, since not all software requires admin to be installed). Also, Windows does pop up a p/w dialog if you are not logged in as admin, even if the install doesn't require it. To be fair, I believe that last bit was only added in SP2.

    61. Re:In other news... by IceFox · · Score: 1

      Can you give more details? Was the book initially authorized using the admin account? Did it happen with more then one book?

      --
      Do you changes clothes while making the "chee-chee-cha-cha-choh" transformation sound?
    62. Re:In other news... by Errtu76 · · Score: 1

      You can't install shit.

      "Run As".


      That doesn't always work. I mean, the installation process might finish succesfully, but the application could have installed something that 'normal' users don't have rights to. I experienced it recently when i tried to install Palm software (Run As.. Administrator) and then tried to use it as another user. The application didn't work and some icons were missing/replaced.

    63. Re:In other news... by 4of12 · · Score: 1

      You can't install shit.

      Say it again, brother!

      --
      "Provided by the management for your protection."
    64. Re:In other news... by Cat_Byte · · Score: 1

      I called my gf a 2 bit hooker and she hit me with a bag of quarters.

      --
      Two roads diverged in a wood, and I - I took the one the bus load of girls just went down.
    65. Re:In other news... by zx-6e · · Score: 1
      Easy.

      iap.exe : Dell OpenManage Client Instrumentation
      hkcmd.exe : Intel Hotkey, installed alongside Intel multimedia devices and allows configuration and diagnostic options for these devices
      ssexp.exe : Visual SourceSafe executable (the app)

    66. Re:In other news... by fishbot · · Score: 1

      :)

      http://www.windowsstartup.com/wso/index.php

      or use the properties of the executable.

      Point was that on a Windows box, just because you didn't manually install it doesn't mean it ain't running!

    67. Re:In other news... by ak3ldama · · Score: 1

      I do believe my day just got better. The idea of "masterbating /. monkeys" has just been thrown into my head, and i don't know how i will ever be able to get it out. non the less, it's quite hilarious. Well done AC. It's hilarious anonymous comments like yours that make slashdot so damn great, and yet so damn putrid the rest of the time.

      --
      "but money is the God of Algiers & Mahomet their prophet." - Rich. O'Bryen June 8th 1786
    68. Re:In other news... by Cromac · · Score: 1
      I wonder if any employees at M$ use solaris or linux.

      Very very few use it at work at Microsoft. There are some servers setup, mail/news/web tests are run against servers other than Microsoft (at least they did when I was testing there), but virtually none, out of the 20,000+ employees, use Linux as a desktop at Microsoft. Quite a few use it at home, but not at work.

    69. Re:In other news... by Kent+Recal · · Score: 1

      I certainly hope you don't login to the GUI as root?
      Why would anyone want to do such a stupid thing?

    70. Re:In other news... by ecliptic_1 · · Score: 1

      When I was a contractor at Microsoft back in late 90s I ran Red Hat Linux [can't remember version, maybe it was 5.2] with vmware holding my windows sessions I used for troubleshooting Win9x issues.

      So ha!

      Back then I don't think anyone in management even knew or cared what linux was.

    71. Re:In other news... by mce · · Score: 1
      Our company site (we're into microelectronics research and as such biased towards more technically minded visitors) was recently subject of a (admittedly lower volume) /. article, so I can give you some data. For what it's worth, that is.

      The normal distribution of visiting browsers at our site on a daily basis is 85 to 90 perscent IE and 8 to 12 percent Netscape/Mozilla/Firefox combined.IE has been in decline for several months now, it used to reach 95% a year or so ago.

      On the day we hit /. (we weren't /.-ed, so one can't say that they hit us :-) we saw about 75% IE and about 20% Netscape/Mozilla/Firefox. (I had the exact data sitting in my inbox till yesterday evening, but this morning I threw them away since I thought I'd never have an opportunity to use them anyway. Damn!)

    72. Re:In other news... by thoth · · Score: 1

      Hehe, true. Not much confidence... more of a small benefit of the doubt. ;)

    73. Re:In other news... by drsmithy · · Score: 1
      Clearly you've never used Mac OS X. Apple got it right.

      I own a Mac, and Apple certainly did get it right. However, I don't find the (few) times I need to resort to "Run As" particularly worse, just different.

      You always run as a normal user, it's impossible to log in as "root".

      It's quite possible to login as root, you just need to enable the account. Of course, we weren't actually talking about logging in as a user with elevated privileges, simply running arbitrary programs as such a user - and on OS X it's trivial to launch programs or perform actions as root with no modification of the default configuration.

      But on Windows, installers are .exe files. When you double-click on an installer, the installer basically never checks to see if it has permissions. It just tries to install and then fails with a cryptic error message if you weren't logged in as an admin.

      Note that this is a developer problem not an OS problem. It's certainly quite possible for a developer's installer to trigger a privilege-elevating prompt from the installer.

      I understand that "Run As..." isn't that much trouble, but try teaching your mom to install software that way; it's just not intuitive!

      Probably true and in that context OS X does it better.

      Don't forget the dozens of Windows programs that simply won't run unless you're logged in as admin.

      Again, "Run As" will do fine for 99.9% of them and, again, this is a developer problem.

    74. Re:In other news... by drsmithy · · Score: 1
      No that's not the point. I can install software both on my linux system an on my mac without being root. I just install it into my home directory.

      You can do the same in Windows as well, as long as the developer hasn't crippled their software.

      On the mac if I want to install it for everybody I drag the icon to the applications folder. The Mac then asks me for the username and the password of an admin user and it's done.

      Or on Windows you just "Run As" the setup.exe.

    75. Re:In other news... by rahard · · Score: 1

      Well for one thing, Firefox still messes up slashdot display. See here:
      http://andika-lives-here.blogspot.com/2004/12/slas hdot-tidak-firefox-friendly.html (unfortunately in Bahasa Indonesia)
      I was told it's because of slow (dialup?) lines.
      I still use Firefox though.

    76. Re:In other news... by DenDave · · Score: 1

      who said anything about a gui? Oh.. I guess Midnight Commander qualifies as a gui... LOL!

      --
      -if at first you don't succeed, stay the heck away from paragliding.
  3. Hmmmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Accurate Statistics I see. 100% use google, with a 146% margin of error.

  4. Broken link on front page by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You'll need to follow this link to get here.

  5. White House stats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did they purposely leave out information like browser use and prefered operating systems for the White House section?

    1. Re:White House stats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yes, It would be a national security threat if terrorists knew "The White House" had cookies enabled and used IE.

      Either that or they didnt want Bill Gates to know they were using *nix of some kind...

    2. Re:White House stats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Because bill gates has his private army. Seriously, hat do you do with more money than some countries, like total control, and enjoy ruthlessly squashing the competition?

      Buy an army. I know I would.

      They didn't call it the "browser wars" for nothing. Bill gates has more power than your mind can boggle.

      The tsunami? Open source was getting too much news coverage.

      9/11? It was supposed to link to linux zealots, but the PR campaign failed.

      If bill gates knew that the US government was using Linux, we would have some real regime change.

      You were warned.

    3. Re:White House stats by kurzweilfreak · · Score: 0

      In other news, Bill & Co. quietly propose the purchase of all the world's tinfoil manufacturing plants...

      --

      kurzweil_freak

      5th Kyu Genbukan Ninpo/KJJR student

      Be the darkness that allows the light to shine.

    4. Re:White House stats by JeffTL · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, for what it's worth there's a picture of President Bush (Dubya 43, not Poppy 41) with a PowerBook G3 (the Pismo model, I think), so we can imagine what he probably uses personally. I imagine that the executive office is primarily Windows and likely part Mac.

      And for you blue folk, there's a picture that was in Time of John Kerry with a PowerBook G4, and Al Gore was evidently a Final Cut Pro enthusaist even before getting on the Apple board.

    5. Re:White House stats by Poilobo · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's because even though they told the president he had a laptop, it was really an etch-a-sketch. It came with easier instructions:

      Mr. President, if your laptop gets mess-i-fied or subliminalated hold it upside down and shake to reboot.

      --
      Sig (appended to the end of comments you post, 120 chars)
    6. Re:White House stats by idsofmarch · · Score: 0, Troll

      I hope you're fucking kidding.

      I mean really, please be kidding.

      --
      Anyone who whines about being modded down should be.
    7. Re:White House stats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup, he's kidding. Al Gore took the initiative in inventing the Hip Hop music scene.

    8. Re:White House stats by Richard+Dick+Head · · Score: 1

      Aha, I've found it: George Bush's Mac

      Its a little tough finding, since searching for George Bush and Macintosh comes up with many spam pages and Macintosh users' Bush-bash blogs....although I did find a neat Bush Potato Head thing. Judging from that, the President would look cooler with a shaved head and a goatee.

    9. Re:White House stats by MartinB · · Score: 2, Funny

      Visual inspection of senior West Wing staffers shows that a high proportion of them run OSX laptops.

      --

      The only thing you can accurately describe as "Scotch" is a sticky tape made by 3M. And it's

    10. Re:White House stats by Presidential · · Score: 1

      Once while visiting the White House, I got to see, briefly, a terminal's screen. While it looked like Windows, there were enough minor visual differences to make me believe it wasn't exactly Gatesian in nature.

      When I asked the operator of the terminal what OS they were using, she shrugged her shoulders as though it wasn't privy to her position to know such minutiae.

      Staffers can use whatever they want on their laptop. Or at least they could back then. I'm sure they've gotten a little more sensitive since then to security issues.

      --
      Whenever Mrs. Fitch breaks wind, we beat the dog.
    11. Re:White House stats by MrHanky · · Score: 1

      Damn. That's not a Pismo. The Pismo has a white apple over the screen, and the Powerbook logo below. So does the Lombard. No, that laptop has to be a 14" Wallstreet. And I'm typing this on a 14" Wallstreet. I feel so dirty.

    12. Re:White House stats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the President would look cooler with a shaved head and a goatee.

      If you check out the post just above yours (the one with the NSFW warning), you'll see a picture that's just one letter off of your suggestion.

    13. Re:White House stats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Wow! We have a winner!

      Most original post of the day!

      Is there some way to mod a post -1, Redundant relative to the rest of the world?

  6. IBM employees by tjwhaynes · · Score: 5, Informative
    And IBM is using Windows exclusively?

    Well, only if myself, about half of my immediate colleagues, the Linux Technology Center people, all the people on the internal linux mailing lists and probably quite a few others don't count :-)

    Given that one data point looks a bit borked, I'm wondering about the rest of the data...

    Cheers,
    Toby Haynes

    --
    Anything I post is strictly my own thoughts and doesn't necessarily have anything to do with the opinions of IBM.
    1. Re:IBM employees by Alan+Cox · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It seems pretty dubious to me. IBM run some rather decent security so I'd bet they are measuring IBM security service output. Ditto a lot of the other companies listed.

    2. Re:IBM employees by Quantum+Skyline · · Score: 1

      Don't forget the amount of people who use both.

      I'll bet there's a lot of people with more than one box. I did.

    3. Re:IBM employees by spylee · · Score: 1

      When I was there, that was all I had available... and a little putty window into the Linux server. At least it proves that the apps run on both!

  7. Huh? by Atrax · · Score: 1

    This report shows the top search engines used by users from Microsoft Corp:

    Sorry, no data available on this company/organization for this specific topic.


    ??

    --
    Screw you all! I'm off to the pub
    1. Re:Huh? by hourieh · · Score: 1

      I get that error message on other pages too, I think their database server is down or something.

  8. slow down ppl by nahnkari · · Score: 0

    Warning: mysql_connect(): Can't connect to local MySQL server through socket '/var/lib/mysql/mysql.sock' (11) in /var/www/virtual/visitorville/intelligence/page.ph p on line 20 Connection: Can't connect to local MySQL server through socket '/var/lib/mysql/mysql.sock' (11)

  9. best results... by spac3manspiff · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Google employees use Google as their search engine 100% of the time

    That means when the employees actually use what they make... it must be good.

    1. Re:best results... by sqrt(2) · · Score: 4, Funny

      Let me tell you about the years I spent working in a sausage factory...

      --
      If you build it, nerds will come. Soylentnews.org
    2. Re:best results... by Space+Coyote · · Score: 5, Funny
      Google employees use Google as their search engine 100% of the time That means when the employees actually use what they make... it must be good.

      But also imagine how fast it would be to have Google and its entire internet cache on your LAN?

      --
      ___
      Cogito cogito, ergo cogito sum.
    3. Re:best results... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Although it's best to also use the competitions' products regularly, to find out where their strengths, and your weaknesses, are...

    4. Re:best results... by drsmithy · · Score: 5, Funny
      That means when the employees actually use what they make... it must be good.

      You may wish to reconsider that statement in light of Microsoft's extensive and well-known policy of "eating their own dog food" :).

    5. Re:best results... by drsmithy · · Score: 1
      Results 1 - 10 of about 56,400 for yeppoon site:au. (0.16 seconds)
      Dude, I don't think it could get much faster than that...
    6. Re:best results... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      I know someone who worked at one time in a slaugher house that took the pigs from start to nothing left. He still eats lunch meat.

    7. Re:best results... by Peyna · · Score: 1

      That's the time the search took; it took a little bit longer for it to load the page for you than it would for them.

      --
      What?
    8. Re:best results... by kesuki · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah It could take almost 40 ms less to load the page. that's .04 seconds BTW.
      My current latency to Google 47MS to my router .2ms
      So assuming you're on the lan over at google, your latency should be around .2 to 7 MS depending on length of ethernet, number of switches you're hopping through etc... I'm going 20 feet, to get .2 MS, I'm assuming that google is in a building larger than 20'x20' wide, so presumablly if you've got 1000 feet of cable, and latency remains constant per foot of ethernet the latency could rise to 2 ms. but that's not considering the possiblitiy they're using lower latency fiber optic netowrks for thier entire lan.

    9. Re:best results... by Dr.+Derail · · Score: 1

      Or they're no longer employees of the company or they're hands have been removed....or both.

    10. Re:best results... by notthe9 · · Score: 1

      But also imagine how fast it would be to have Google and its entire internet cache on your LAN?

      And how convinient it would be to access slashdotted sites like this on it.

    11. Re:best results... by vettemph · · Score: 1
      Microsoft's extensive and well-known policy of "eating their own dog food"

      More like eating there own sh*t. I've smelled dog food before, the sh*t microsoft makes smells nothing like dog food.

      --
      The government which is strong enough to protect you from everything is strong enough to take everything from you.
    12. Re:best results... by pcmanjon · · Score: 2, Informative

      " Yeah It could take almost 40 ms less to load the page. that's .04 seconds BTW.
      My current latency to Google 47MS to my router .2ms
      So assuming you're on the lan over at google, your latency should be around .2 to 7 MS depending on length of ethernet, number of switches you're hopping through etc... I'm going 20 feet, to get .2 MS, I'm assuming that google is in a building larger than 20'x20' wide, so presumablly if you've got 1000 feet of cable, and latency remains constant per foot of ethernet the latency could rise to 2 ms. but that's not considering the possiblitiy they're using lower latency fiber optic netowrks for thier entire lan."

      Actually, it'd take as long to load the page in the Google H.Q. Offices as it would you or me. The google servers are hosted in a dedicated server farm, which is outside of their primary building.

    13. Re:best results... by Fishead · · Score: 5, Funny

      I think you mean:

      Proverbs 26:11
      As a dog returns to its vomit, so a fool repeats his folly.

    14. Re:best results... by shird · · Score: 1

      When a company doesnt bother to look at its competitors, it must be bad.

      --
      I.O.U One Sig.
    15. Re:best results... by rifftide · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Although MSN search is still fairly lame, eventually it won't be, and the google folks better keep tabs on what MS is coming up with.

      Many years ago John Delorean wrote a book describing his career as a GM executive. As an example of the rigidity of their culture, he was called on the carpet for renting Ford cars at airports to check out the competition. GM employees, he was told, rented only GM cars. And GM executives weren't supposed to drive rental cars at all - they were chauferred by subordinates.

    16. Re:best results... by Saige · · Score: 1

      If you use what you help make, you get much more familiar with the problems and shortcomings the product has, and fix them.

      If you won't use your own product, why should you expect anyone else to?

      --
      "You know your god is man-made when he hates all the same people you do."
    17. Re:best results... by ayf6 · · Score: 1

      too bad google doesnt obey http headers when it does its caching...

    18. Re:best results... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How much faster can you get than 0.02 seconds?

    19. Re:best results... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      0.01 seconds?

    20. Re:best results... by PingPongBoy · · Score: 1

      Ergo Google must be able to virus scan everything they have and tell us where the bad sites are.

      --
      Know your pads. One time pad: good for cryptography. Two timing pad: where to take your mistress.
    21. Re:best results... by PingPongBoy · · Score: 1

      My poor delusional surfer, the start of your download may be quick but a file in the MBs will take all too long.

      --
      Know your pads. One time pad: good for cryptography. Two timing pad: where to take your mistress.
    22. Re:best results... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The fact that Google employees use Google 100% of the time does, I agree, reflect the fact that they make a good product. However, I would feel much more reassured if that figure was around 97-98%. Why? Because it means that no one inside of Google is actually trying out other search engines, comparing their own real searches and information needs against the results provided by other companies. Call it hubris, call it whatever, but the fact that -no one- at Google, even attempts another engine, means that no one is aware of the modes in which Google actually fails, and another engine succeeds. Google doesn't always work.

      There are certain query-types that Google is optimized for, and others I find that, say, Altavista (yes, Altavista) works better on. And if Google themselves never use/try anything else, it means a lack of critical feedback. If this figure remains 100%, I predict a strong Google decline in the next few years. Know what I mean? An inability to be self-critical, and to compare yourself to others and see where you come up short, is not a good sign.

    23. Re:best results... by hollismb · · Score: 1

      In my opinion, that's just retarded. Wouldn't at least some percentage of Google's population be required to use other search engines to compare results? One would think they'd be constantly comparing themselves to others in this fashion in order to keep ahead of their competitors, and that would account for at least a percentage or so.

    24. Re:best results... by Pakaran2 · · Score: 1

      I would think their 100,000 servers are in multiple datacenters by now. Otherwise, they'd be producing ~ 30 MW of heat. I think this would lead to an unpleasant work environment (and perhaps a rapidly absent building...) if it were all in the googleplex.

      As such, it's debatable how many employees actually have LAN access to the whole cache (isn't it about a PB?) and how many have to browse it over an intranet or VPN that's not much faster than our own broadband connections.

      And I know I'm going to lose karma for "-1, killing the joke," but oh well.

    25. Re:best results... by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      s/a dedicated server farm/many dedicated server farms
      It's a big freakin' operation. They have multi-site redundancy, running it all on consumer-level hardware.
      I'd find a link, but I'm lazy.

    26. Re:best results... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can pull 168 Kibs on a torrent file...
      I scoff at mere MBs, as do anyone working at google ;)

  10. ab0rken? by KFury · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Either VisitorVille responds to slashdotting by saying it doesn't have data, or some companies were *really* fast with their privacy injunctions.

    1. Re:ab0rken? by kesuki · · Score: 3, Funny

      Actually What I got was Dear Slashdotter,

      We're sorry we missed you.

      In your infinite bounty, you have brought down our server.

      Please check back once the /. effect has subsided. Here's the URL to bookmark: http://intelligence.visitorville.com

      Thanks for your interest!

      Robert Savage, Mayor, VisitorVille

    2. Re:ab0rken? by Curtman · · Score: 1
      I wonder why they felt the need to update the slashdotting notice:

      • Dear Visitor,


      • We're sorry we missed you. Tonight our site appeared on Slashdot.org.

        And, in its infinite bounty, Slashdot brought down our server. We feel your pain. Literally.

        Please check back once the /. effect has subsided. Here's the URL to bookmark: http://intelligence.visitorville.com

        Thanks for your interest!

        VisitorVille's Mayor


      Maybe they just realized I didn't bring down any servers, except that one time that I spilled my coffee.
    3. Re:ab0rken? by kesuki · · Score: 1

      It has to do With Referrer handling. You for whatever reason aren't telling the websites you go to who linked you to them. I clicked the link straight off of slashdot, and slashdot.org was used as 'referrer' by my browser. therefor thier server thought you were someone who had gotten the urly some other way, while they knew i came from /.

    4. Re:ab0rken? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It has to do With Referrer handling.

      Nope. They just changed the message.

      Nice try though.

  11. This just in... by bhadreshl · · Score: 5, Funny

    97% of NY Times employees use this to log into the NY Times website

    1. Re:This just in... by antdude · · Score: 1

      Or this. I use this more than BugMeNot for NY Times so I can share links if needed. ;)

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  12. Firefox by phillycheese · · Score: 0

    You'd think that slashdot users, being nerds, would use Firefox...

    1. Re:Firefox by Roland+Piquepaille · · Score: 3, Funny

      You'd think that slashdot users, being nerds, would use Firefox...

      Dude, you're so last millenium...

      Being a countercurrent techno freak implies using unfashionable tools. With all the positive press OSS gets, nerd-chic these days is to use IE.

    2. Re:Firefox by asdf.qwerty.zxcv · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Employees are restricted to what software is installed on the servers. If it were up to me i would you Opera, but it isn't. Slashdot != FF users And besides, is there really any point to visit /. when you get back home using your fav browser just to rack up stats?

    3. Re:Firefox by Transcendent · · Score: 5, Funny

      Being a countercurrent techno freak implies using unfashionable tools. With all the positive press OSS gets, nerd-chic these days is to use IE.

      Or, with regarding security, I just like to say, "I use IE because I like a challenge..."

    4. Re:Firefox by chris_mahan · · Score: 2, Funny

      Amen!

      I use IE 5.01 from the original Win2k install (SPnone) with no security updates and:

      A: Can't use the web worth shit.

      B: Have lots of data for my upcoming book "How long does it take spyware to use 100% of my cpu 24x7" book.

      Read my sig.

      --

      "Piter, too, is dead."

    5. Re:Firefox by cooley · · Score: 1

      Your browser is installed on a server? Are you running a thin client or something?

      --
      Just then the floating disembodied head of Colonel Sanders started yelling Everything You Know Is Wrong!-Weird Al
    6. Re:Firefox by djupedal · · Score: 1

      With all the positive press OSS gets, nerd-chic these days is to use IE.

      Right, and I suppose that logic explains why you carry a chalkboard and a light-stick instead of a cellphone?

      I'm not buying this broke-ass excuse tout today, sorry :)

    7. Re:Firefox by thetroll123 · · Score: 1

      Dude, you're so last millenium...

      Not being able to spell "millennium" is rather 1999 too, isn't it?

  13. Sun employees hate their daddy? by overbyj · · Score: 2, Funny

    only 39% of Sun employees use Sun OS??? That seems awfully low to me. Granted, I am sure they do use Windows and Linux (at least their version) for various and sunder things around the office but 39%.....there is something very unusual about that.

    If you can't preach to the choir there, how are you going to preach to the masses??

    --
    No trees were harmed in the composition of this; however, numerous electrons were inconvenienced.
    1. Re:Sun employees hate their daddy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you can't preach to the choir there, how are you going to preach to the masses??

      Sun isn't preaching to the masses to use SunOS as their desktop. And since most people don't use servers to access the web...

    2. Re:Sun employees hate their daddy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I find that pretty surprising.

      Most Sun campuses use SunRay thin clients on every desk. Unless you have a need for non-solaris software then the only way to have a non-sun machine is to bring in your own laptop. And as many laptops run macos and linux as windows.

    3. Re:Sun employees hate their daddy? by Brandybuck · · Score: 2, Informative

      Solaris was designed for servers and workstations. It was never meant for the low end desktop. 39% is pretty high if you think about it.

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    4. Re:Sun employees hate their daddy? by BigGerman · · Score: 5, Funny

      mmm, because they cannot afford Sun's hardware for everyone? ;-)

    5. Re:Sun employees hate their daddy? by nukem996 · · Score: 1

      My GFs cousin works for Sun and at there Christmas party I was talking to her about it. She said shes never used Solaris or Linux at work. I was actually the first one to show her Linux. She said she had StarOffice a long time about and hated it. She now uses a Win 98 laptop with Office 2000.

    6. Re:Sun employees hate their daddy? by Basehart · · Score: 1, Funny

      "My GFs cousin works for Sun and at there Christmas party I was talking to her about it."

      You have a Girlfriend AND you were also talking to another Girl?

      I think you're on the wrong board mate!

    7. Re:Sun employees hate their daddy? by SunFan · · Score: 1

      She said she had StarOffice a long time about and hated it. She now uses a Win 98 laptop with Office 2000.

      Well, it could actually say a good thing about Sun management for them to accomodate your GF's cousin. But how long ago was the party, as the other replies mention SunRays on every desk?

      --
      -- Microsoft is the most expensive commodity operating system and office suite vendor in the marketplace.
    8. Re:Sun employees hate their daddy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have a Girlfriend AND you were also talking to another Girl?

      Give him a break. The "other girl" is actually a sock puppet painted with lipstick.

    9. Re:Sun employees hate their daddy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People using SunRays won't necessarily know what they're using as it's somewhat deliberately obscured. Turns out it's usually mozilla 1.4 (!) on Solaris. Then again, rumours to the contrary notwithstanding, everyone doesn't use SunRays all the time. It'd really suck trying to develop Solaris with nothing but a Ray on your desk.

    10. Re:Sun employees hate their daddy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      90% of Sun employees I know use a SunRay which uses SunOS as the backing OS. The 40% number is very bogus.

    11. Re:Sun employees hate their daddy? by ukleafer · · Score: 1

      I'm almost certain that that figure is too low. When new employees are set up at Sun, or new desktops are requested, services come and give you a SPARC box running Solaris (at least that's how it worked a year ago when I was there).

      I'm sure that less than 61% of users are driven to switching OS. Most of the engineering people had laptops running Windows (which has to be "neutered" by a small application that locks down open ports before it's allowed anywhere near the corporate LAN) or OSX. They still used Solaris with various shells on top as their development environment, which still includes a lot of web use.

      People outside eng and general management - I can't really see them having a real need to use any other OS other than for personal preference.

    12. Re:Sun employees hate their daddy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gotta second that. Now that you're not stuck on CDE and like Netscape 4 (Gnome and Moz are the standards now), there are fewer and fewer reasons to not just use a SunRay. Indeed, just about everyone in my group is both flex and on a SunRay and has been for 2+ years, and the results have been mostly positive (really!).

      Real developers are accessing their dev boxen remotely (in labs) and have silent (and flexible) offices.

    13. Re:Sun employees hate their daddy? by northcat · · Score: 1

      Solaris runs on x86 too.

    14. Re:Sun employees hate their daddy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I heard from a reliable source that the sock puppet you are referring to is actually his girlfriend! ^_^

    15. Re:Sun employees hate their daddy? by bgeerdes · · Score: 1

      This is probably counting both employees in a Sun office and those dialing in from home. In the office, I'd guess 99% are using Solaris. At home, it's more heterogeneous.

      What I'd be curious to see is if there is more Mac or Linux use at Sun homes than the population at large.

  14. Stats show... by wcitechnologies · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...that 100% of Microsoft employees use sol.exe.

    --
    Electrons are free; it is moving them that becomes expensive.
    1. Re:Stats show... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Stats show... ...that 100% of Microsoft employees use sol.exe.

      This article is about web browsers. sol.exe is used for modeling code structure.

      Windows improved greatly after the introduction of FreeCell.

  15. For Free by sg3000 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I admitted just did a quick glance, but I didn't find their figures to be credible. I looked the company I work for, and it was listed as 100% Windows 2000 and 100% IE6.

    However, we have a mix of Windows 2000, Sun Workstations, Linux machines, and more than a few Macintoshes. Our IT-supported browser is Netscape, not Internet Explorer. So I expected a little more diversity than what they're showing.

    Also, their web site says they provide "company specific marketing information". Technically they are providing "market information" not "marketing information". There is a difference. "Market information" means just raw data (which is what they're providing). "Marketing information" means information that helps you make a decision: Should we avoid Flash because too few users at our site have it enabled? This is probably a nit-pick to many people, but for a company offering their research, the difference is nontrivial. The people whom they are targeting their information (besides people just curious for trivia) likely know the difference.

    However, based on what I saw reported for my company, their data does not seem to accurately reflect what browsers/etc. people are actually using. Thus you could draw incorrect conclusions from their data.

    Maybe that's why the information is free. You get what you pay for.

    --
    Insert simplistic political, ideological, or personal proselytization here.
    1. Re:For Free by savagedome · · Score: 1

      I looked the company I work for, and it was listed as 100% Windows 2000 and 100% IE6.
      However, we have a mix of Windows 2000, Sun Workstations, Linux machines, and more than a few Macintoshes.


      Now you know what all those guys with the Windows machines are doing.

    2. Re:For Free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      it was listed as 100% Windows 2000 and 100% IE6. However, we have a mix of Windows 2000, Sun Workstations, Linux machines, and more than a few Macintoshes. Our IT-supported browser is Netscape, not Internet Explorer. So I expected a little more diversity than what they're showing.
      This shouldn't surprise you at all. What they are probably doing, is not actually measuring what browser people are using (how could they?) and instead are counting user-agent headers.

      Where I used to work, nobody used MSIE, but all requests had MSIE for Windows in the header, because I told the squid proxy to do that, so that people would stop asking me for help when some website bitched about requiring MSIE.

      Sending "User-Agent: MSIE" is practically part of the defacto http standard.

    3. Re:For Free by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Except that IE actually claims to be mozilla 4.0 in it's user-agent string.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
  16. More Stats by mg2 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Regarding White House internet usage, the number one browser used from the Oval Office itself is that of Xbox Live.

    When approached for comment, President Bush stated that he likes to relieve his stress by, "blowing the shit out of my constituency on Halo 2."

    1. Re:More Stats by PortWineBoy · · Score: 5, Funny

      Honestly that would impress me, I woulda figured Dubya to be a WebTV man myself.

      --

      this sig deleted by another sig

    2. Re:More Stats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you saying The Bush has the intelligence to operate and Xbox?? You give your prez way too much credit.

    3. Re:More Stats by Sophrosyne · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually he still gets the Internet via gasoline powered typewriter.

    4. Re:More Stats by The+Grey+Clone · · Score: 0

      How do you get the internet on a gasoline powered typewriter. There are gasoline powered typewriters?

    5. Re:More Stats by Heftklammerdosierer! · · Score: 0

      It doesn't matter if gasoline typewriters exist, just where you can download NetBSD for them.

    6. Re:More Stats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The Cheat, your computer has too much computer in it, and not enough typewriter"

    7. Re:More Stats by cooley · · Score: 3, Funny

      Conversely, if there is no port of NetBSD for a gas-powered typewriter, then I for one am prepared to accept that as evidence that they do not indeed exist.

      --
      Just then the floating disembodied head of Colonel Sanders started yelling Everything You Know Is Wrong!-Weird Al
    8. Re:More Stats by vjmurphy · · Score: 1

      That would be "Internets" I think.

      --
      Vincent J. Murphy
      Spandex Justice
    9. Re:More Stats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pffft, that's just the vast right-wing conspiracy talking.

      Those in the know are aware that the white house's primary means of communication is flinging crap.

    10. Re:More Stats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't he like the perfect target user for Microsoft Bob?

    11. Re:More Stats by killjoe · · Score: 1

      Dubya would not use the internet. It was invented by a democrat.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    12. Re:More Stats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny, I had an image of the cardboard prop from the furniture store.....

  17. What a shock... by douthitb · · Score: 1

    It's no big surprise to see Microsoft employees almost exclusively using Microsoft products - I am very doubtful that Microsoft gives its employees much freedom, if any, to install the software of their choice.

    1. Re:What a shock... by Atrax · · Score: 5, Informative

      I am very doubtful that Microsoft gives its employees much freedom, if any, to install the software of their choice.

      Actually, pretty much all MS employees are admins on their own machines, and aren't particularly heavily restricted on what they can install, as long as it's legal and licenced.

      P2P apps and their ilk are restricted, as well as most other stuff at the dodgy end of the spectrum, but no-one's formally restricted on what browser they can install. Except of course for the fact that intranet sites use windows integrated auth, and will tend to break in non-IE

      --
      Screw you all! I'm off to the pub
    2. Re:What a shock... by dioscaido · · Score: 1

      Yeah it totally sucks. They chain us to our desks and make us eat left over Windows ME CDs. :P

      Sometimes I wish all the people who hate M$ this badly would interview for the company -- not to work there (although they'd have to pretend like they wanted to), but to get a tour of campus, have a look inside, and see how things really work. Once you sign the NDA they are pretty liberal with what they show you (development wise). Seeing as the people here are so smart, they'd definitely get the flyback to Seattle. ;) The place is nowhere near perfect, but damn it's amazing the things people come up with when guessing at what happens behind closed doors.

    3. Re:What a shock... by Saige · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No kidding.

      About a year and a half ago, I was part of the brain-dead "M$ is evil" hordes that populate this site. Then I visited Seattle, fell in love with the area, and someone I knew here happened to work at MS and started telling me about the environment and the people. So I decided to look there, along with other places.

      It took 6 months to score an interview, and besides the fact that the 'legendarily tough' interview process was actually rather enjoyable as far as interviews go, I was downright impressed by everything I saw and the people I talked to.

      Tomorrow I celebrate my 1 year mark with the company, and I hope to stick around for quite a while longer, as it is much more enjoyable than previous work, the people are smart and really want to put together great software, and I don't feel like a cog in some corporate machine.

      It's not a perfect place, but I can definitely say that the bulk of people working here are smart, driven, and really wanting to make quality products. I haven't seen any of the evil that the Slashdot hordes seem to imply permeates the campus in Redmond.

      Besides, I graduated from a bland grey cubicle in the middle of a cube farm to my own office which I'm filling with stuffed animals, various gadgets (glitter lamp, purple tube lights), and a pampasan chair. That right there gives a work environment tons of bonus points.

      Oh, and I use Firefox and WinAMP on my machine, without any problems. Oh, and Visual Studio 2005 Beta, which I'll just say is 100 times more preferrable than when I was using XEmacs, gcc, and makefiles on Slowaris machines at my last job.

      --
      "You know your god is man-made when he hates all the same people you do."
    4. Re:What a shock... by codemachine · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't think most people here think that the developers at MS are evil (well maybe some do, but they're just zealots). What most people have a problem with is the company's business practices. Usually those are not decided by the software developers; they're set out by the upper managers and businessmen at MS.

      It is a well known fact that there are a lot of smart people working for MS in the research and development groups, and that MS generally is smart enough to treat those people quite well. But unfortunately it is also well known that MS's business practices are illegal in most countries, and most would say quite unethical.

      Many would also argue that despite the many smart people working there, much of the software sold to consumers simply sucks. And I believe the business side is mostly to blame for this. Only Windows and Office really make the company any money, so the business is built around selling those two cash cows, and then dominating every other area in computing they can get their hands and somehow tying it to those two products. There is little motive to come out with anything truly innovative. For all I know, you developers at MS might be creating the worlds greatest applications (and maybe a version of IE that doesn't suck), but the consumers won't see it for a while, or may never see some of it at all.

      Now I'm not saying MS's business people are the dumb ones in the company. In fact, many business people could claim that MS must have smart managers to be pursuing this strategy. One look at their balance sheets probably makes it pretty clear what they have to do on the business side. To stray their focus away from the only 2 products making them money would be suicide.

      Maybe one day the business side will not be able to rely entirely on Office and Windows, and therefore will have incentive to act differently. Hopefully (for them) they'd be able to make great use of their researchers and software developers at that point. And maybe, if at that point they learned to play nice with others, I'd stop hating them. Given enough years, even the "MS is evil" zealots might come around. Or maybe I'll quit dreaming and go back to work supporting the multi-OS crapshoot that is my world.

    5. Re:What a shock... by daern · · Score: 1

      Actually, pretty much all MS employees are admins on their own machines, and aren't particularly heavily restricted on what they can install, as long as it's legal and licenced. P2P apps and their ilk are restricted, as well as most other stuff at the dodgy end of the spectrum, but no-one's formally restricted on what browser they can install. Except of course for the fact that intranet sites use windows integrated auth, and will tend to break in non-IE

      Actually, integrated authentication works rather well in Firefox. Unfortunately, however, Firefox doesn't have the same concept of "zones" as IE, which is how IE decides which sites can use NTLM and which ones can't. Consequently, Firefox does not allow any sites to use it by default.

      If you want to try it out, the settings are in about:config under network.automatic-ntlm-auth.trusted-uris

    6. Re:What a shock... by atlasheavy · · Score: 1

      Yep. I had Firefox installed for a while at work over in devdiv land. I got sick of a couple of UI/Ux consistency issues and went back to IE 6. I try FF out every few months to see if my issues have been fixed, but so far no dice.

      --

      iRooster, the Mac OS X a
    7. Re:What a shock... by phek · · Score: 1

      so your saying before you worked at microsoft you were brain-dead, but now that you work there, you some how arent brain dead and everyone around you is smart? hmm...

    8. Re:What a shock... by Smilin · · Score: 1

      You're wrong.

    9. Re:What a shock... by BabyJaysus · · Score: 0
      Actually, pretty much all MS employees are admins on their own machines

      Yeah, pretty much all MS *anything* are admins on their "own" machine.

    10. Re:What a shock... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you are not "admin" of your "own" Linux machine then?

      I don't know anyone using Linux that isn't.

      "Pot, meet Kettle".

    11. Re:What a shock... by Atrax · · Score: 1

      Firefox can do the NTLM part of integrated auth, yes, but AFAIK it won't do Kerberos, which means intranet sites which use impersonation/delegation apparently won't work. (look under "access as null user")

      I've got a case on this right now and I'm using firefox to confirm the behaviour.

      --
      Screw you all! I'm off to the pub
  18. My company's employees use the web to... by jeremythehunt · · Score: 5, Funny

    abuse Slashdot so that our IP gets banned. When we track down the little bastard that did this...

    1. Re:My company's employees use the web to... by PortWineBoy · · Score: 1
      I'm not sure if you are trolling or not, but one of my former coworkers was a fairly notorious troll and I used to wonder if somehow I'd wind up getting banned by /. as a sort of "guilt by association of IPs" thing.

      But then again some of his trolls were pretty funny...

      --

      this sig deleted by another sig

    2. Re:My company's employees use the web to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean the goatse guy?

    3. Re:My company's employees use the web to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey wait... I do that all the time!

      he he he he

    4. Re:My company's employees use the web to... by PortWineBoy · · Score: 1

      Naw that guy wasn't funny. It was the guy who was copying a file on his Mac forever...

      --

      this sig deleted by another sig

  19. In other news... by SuperBanana · · Score: 5, Funny

    95% of dynamic websites crumble within the first 15 comments. 50% after subscriber 'preview'. 5% when Cmdr Taco tries to click on the link before posting the story. 3% when Cmdr Taco tries to click on the link before posting the story. 2% when Cmdr Taco tries to click on the link before posting the story. 0% for Timothy; he's too busy ranting about the latest threat to "our rights online" to check the links.

  20. When by AnonymousCowheart · · Score: 5, Interesting

    When is slashdot going to post their server stats??

    1. Re:When by SunFan · · Score: 1


      What's your preferred browsing platform:

      o Internet Explorer
      o Mozilla Firefox
      o Opera
      o CowboyNeal

      --
      -- Microsoft is the most expensive commodity operating system and office suite vendor in the marketplace.
    2. Re:When by jd · · Score: 1
      But that would be, like, geek porn or something!


      Besides, all you have to do is find a site that publishes its own stats, and then get a story posted that has a link to it.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    3. Re:When by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When hell freezes over. The unofficial stat a few years ago had Windows use above 80%.

    4. Re:When by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      When the editors' preferred platform (hint: Linux) isn't an embarassing minority.

  21. Multiple IBMs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For some reason, they had several IBMs listed. Plain IBM, IBM Corporation, etc.

  22. 50 links by dourk · · Score: 4, Funny

    Just love that all 50 links in the submission are to the same /.ed server.

    "Well, that link didn't work. Maybe this one..."

    --
    Wake up.
    1. Re:50 links by mrmez · · Score: 1

      You see, those of use not using IE have tabbed browsing and clicked more than one of those links before we knew the first was down. In fact, those using IE on the Mac can at least cmd-shift-click a link and open it in a window behind the current window.

  23. Look, I'm not anti-Firefox but... by Faust7 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Firefox is their second most popular browser behind Internet Explorer 6's whopping 98.76% share.

    The second most popular behind 98.76%. Spin that any faster and you'd warp space-time. :)

    1. Re:Look, I'm not anti-Firefox but... by wyldeone · · Score: 2

      Ummmm....That's the stats for Microsoft. I'm suprised that Microsoft even allows there employees to install firefox.

      --
      In the beginning the universe was created. This made a lot of people very angry and is widely considered as a bad move.
    2. Re:Look, I'm not anti-Firefox but... by Baggio · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Hard to be a tester (depends on the product of course) if we don't consider other browsers...

      I work in Office as a tester, and during the last product cycle, when we were releasing Office 2003, I did some sanity passes to make sure that Netscape/Mozilla/Firefox failed gracefully in parts of Sharepoint Portal Server that are specifically coded for IE 5.5+. Except for some administration pages, SPS handled N/M/F for most of the content and scaled back appropriately. The result wasn't as feature rich on those alternate browsers, but every effort was made to make them usable for most people.

      Naturally IE is the prefered browser, and what most things are written for, but as a company, it is in our best interest to make as many products work on a widely diverse set of platforms. Real users don't run everything Microsoft (although they should ;) so of course we're going to use the competitions products for development and testing for completeness.

      However, when I'm done testing and need to be productive on other things, I use IE 6 and perform my searches through the MSN Toolbar/Deskbar suite. I used the Google Toolbar until the MSN suite was released; try and try as I might, I'm still not sold on Firefox.

      --
      Time flies like an arrow;
      Fruit flies like a bananna
    3. Re:Look, I'm not anti-Firefox but... by chromatic · · Score: 5, Funny
      ...as a company, it is in our best interest to make as many products work on a widely diverse set of platforms.

      Wow, Windows 2000 and Windows XP? Nifty.

    4. Re:Look, I'm not anti-Firefox but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ummmm....That's the stats for Microsoft. I'm suprised that Microsoft even allows there employees to install firefox.

      News Flash: At MS people use whatever the hell they want as long as they have a valid license. No restrictions. MS is a freaking software company, not some facist crazy looney-bin. It blows my mind how mislead people are about this place...

    5. Re:Look, I'm not anti-Firefox but... by Spaceman40 · · Score: 2, Funny

      run everything Microsoft (although they should ;)

      Watch out - that kinda talk 'll get you killed 'round these parts!
      --
      I [may] disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.
    6. Re:Look, I'm not anti-Firefox but... by Dano+Watt · · Score: 1

      Real users don't run everything Microsoft (although they should ;) That's like saying real car buffs should buy cars that will break down five miles down the road.

    7. Re:Look, I'm not anti-Firefox but... by Technician · · Score: 1

      Naturally IE is the prefered browser, and what most things are written for

      Which is why I use Norton AV at work and use Firefox at home. There is way too many little things written for IE.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    8. Re:Look, I'm not anti-Firefox but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe you are iffy on FF because Bill Gates is holding you by the balls.

    9. Re:Look, I'm not anti-Firefox but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Real users don't run everything Microsoft (although they should ;) so of course we're going to use the competitions products for development and testing for completeness.

      You forgot to close your bracket .. A smiley doesn't count as a right-bracket. No wonder you're working in testing...

    10. Re:Look, I'm not anti-Firefox but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As someone who works at a Company wich is starting to implement Sharepoint I would like to thank you for making sure that it still somewhat works with Gecko-based browsers. Thanks.

    11. Re:Look, I'm not anti-Firefox but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Real users don't run everything Microsoft (although they should ;)



      Sounds like someone has a hankerin' for a flame war.

  24. IE overcounted by spud603 · · Score: 5, Interesting
    It's likely that IE would get overcounted, at least by a little bit. with firefox and with safari, it's not uncommon to spoof the user agent to show up as IE (to get around sites that check your user agent and won't let you in if you're not on their browser list).

    I don't know how much this could account for, but at least a little.

    1. Re:IE overcounted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. What FUD. I mean honestly.

    2. Re:IE overcounted by jericho4.0 · · Score: 1
      The OP is correct. Some of us have to use our browsers at sites that demand IE. I was in this situation at my last job, and it's not like I switched it back to 'Firefox' every time.

      --
      "A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
  25. IE in MS by dioscaido · · Score: 3, Informative

    Not too surprising, since our intranet apps often use tons IE only features. You can actually do some pretty nifty stuff in IE w/ XML/XSL, Javascript and DHTML. But I'll be damned if it doesn't break every standard in the book. :(

    Fascinating stats. Add me to the % that uses Mozilla. :}

    1. Re:IE in MS by Derek+Pomery · · Score: 1

      You can do nifty things with that same tech in a cross-browser fashion.

      If you're building intranet apps, might as well just use XUL.

      --
      -- perl -e'print pack"H*","6e656d6f406d38792e6f7267"' /. ate my old sig. Bastards.
    2. Re:IE in MS by Atrax · · Score: 1

      Add me to the non-IE % too (Firefox 1.0)

      --
      Screw you all! I'm off to the pub
    3. Re:IE in MS by vwjeff · · Score: 1

      You should be using Mozilla in your situation just like Ford should analyze Chevy, Honda, Dodge, etc. cars.

      My friend's job at GM is to take apart and measure, record and analyze cars from other manufactures. It is no secret because all other car makers do the same thing. You can not improve your product in the eyes of your customer unless you look at the competition.

    4. Re:IE in MS by x-caiver · · Score: 1

      Yes there are some tools that we use that take advantage of IE only features. But lots of people are just lazy when they write them. I have complained to a number of web teams that their app doesn't work on [whatever random browser I'm playing with that week] and I get way more 'oh well, most everyone is using IE so its fine' responses than 'oh crap, i will go see what i did wrong'.

      There is plenty of nifty stuff that can be done without using IE only features using XML, Javascript, DHTML, even ASP.NET. There are also a number of nifty things that can not be done in IE - one of the tools I wrote looks better in non-IE browsers due to a way IE handles some CSS.

    5. Re:IE in MS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why use XUL? It's not cross-browser and IE has a much larger userbase.

    6. Re:IE in MS by Derek+Pomery · · Score: 1

      For intranet apps userbase doesn't matter. And there's an XUL parsing browser for all the major operating systems out there.

      Was just saying, for an intranet, you might as well do a PHP/XUL thin client app.

      --
      -- perl -e'print pack"H*","6e656d6f406d38792e6f7267"' /. ate my old sig. Bastards.
  26. how come by geekoid · · Score: 5, Insightful

    when people see that IE is used 98% of the time by MS, it's becasue MS doesn't give them enough freedom, but when google employees use google 100% of the time it's becasue it is a better product?

    Personal, I have started find google to be less and less useful. I actualy used HOTBOT last week to get result Google wasn't returning.
    And yes, I was as surprised as you are the hotbot is still around.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:how come by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Try vivisimo, it is a search result collection and clustering engine-very useful: vivisimo.com

    2. Re:how come by jrl87 · · Score: 1

      Its not so much a question of quality, but can an average person use something different. When most people by a computer it comes with Windows on it and I'm willing to bet that most of them are not confident enough to change operating systems because there are some substantial risks involved (ie accidently wiping out all your data, installing the wrong drivers for certain components may fry them, etc.) whereas changing a search engine is as simple as going to a different site. Not that hard really, you can even go to google and search for other search engines if you want to find one. And if you don't like that one as much you can go back without any trouble/damage/difficulty or find another.

    3. Re:how come by Stonent1 · · Score: 4, Funny

      I used Firefox exclusively at MS. And I didn't try to hide it. Most MS people just kinda shrug about IE's problems. "Let some guy in India fix it"

    4. Re:how come by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i had to switch back to the old altavista standby a couple days ago to find soemthing the google also could not.

    5. Re:how come by forkazoo · · Score: 1

      Okay, so how many slashdotters remember when alta vista was just a dgital subdomain?

    6. Re:how come by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I stopped using HotBot because the 'T' key is next to the 'Y' key. Shucks, boss, I swear it was a typo.

    7. Re:how come by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or when google was google.stanford.edu?

    8. Re:how come by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many remembers Lycos when it was only a search engine? How many remembers Archie?

      I still have the source to an eaaaarly version of the Lycos spider and indexer somewhere on a tape.

    9. Re:how come by slmdmd · · Score: 1

      same here, I use ask.com to get the result which google.com doesn't.

    10. Re:how come by shess · · Score: 2, Funny

      Okay, so how many slashdotters remember when alta vista was just a dgital subdomain?

      WTF is "Digital"?

    11. Re:how come by kalidasa · · Score: 1

      How many slashdotters remember archie (let alone altavista.digital.com)?

    12. Re:how come by northcat · · Score: 1

      Point well taken.

    13. Re:how come by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You worked temporarily in the Irving, TX branch. Therefore your anecdotes are false.

    14. Re:how come by goofyspouse · · Score: 1

      "so how many slashdotters remember when alta vista was just a dgital subdomain?"

      I do. That was back when it actually gave useful search results. They went in the shitter even before getting swallowed by Compaq, though.

    15. Re:how come by relaxmax · · Score: 1

      And what would you do if you were the some guy in India?!

      --
      Love all, Trust few, Follow one.
    16. Re:how come by swillden · · Score: 1

      And what would you do if you were the some guy in India?!

      Well, I don't know what I'd do, but, apparently, what he does is shrug and say: "Let some guy in Redmond fix it".

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    17. Re:how come by DeVilla · · Score: 1
      I used Firefox exclusively at MS. And I didn't try to hide it.
      I guess I'm not sure if you are trying to imply anything about how this was looked upon at MS, but I did notice you spoke in the past tense.
    18. Re:how come by bigbigbison · · Score: 1

      Except IE and Firefox are programs, and they con prevent someone from installing a program, I seriously doubt that Google would go to the trouble of blocking web sites.

      --
      http://www.popularculturegaming.com -- my blog about the culture of videogame players
    19. Re:how come by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      I remember that; I think I first used the web in '94, maybe '95, and altavista.digital.com was the first search engine I knew about.

    20. Re:how come by Stonent1 · · Score: 1

      Like the Coward above said it was a temp position.

  27. VisitorVille = spyware by complete+loony · · Score: 3, Interesting

    well, kindof.. So they track every user who visits a site running their web bug and they *could* sell that information to anyone.
    BTW I hope they're seeing lots of slashdot tornado's and riots at the moment... :)

    --
    09F91102 no, 455FE104 nope, F190A1E8 uh-uh, 7A5F8A09 that's not it, C87294CE no. Ah! 452F6E403CDF10714E41DFAA257D313F.
    1. Re:VisitorVille = spyware by Soko · · Score: 1

      Oh, they use a web bug to collect data? Would that explain the stats showing some companies like IBM as 100% IE, maybe? Hmmmmm....

      Soko

      --
      "Depression is merely anger without enthusiasm." - Anonymous
    2. Re:VisitorVille = spyware by pcmanjon · · Score: 1

      "So they track every user who visits a site running their web bug"

      So you're telling me google has this fucking bug in it? Doubt it.. how else would they get the Apache access.log with MS ips from google to anaylize?

    3. Re:VisitorVille = spyware by complete+loony · · Score: 1

      No, they use the referrer of the page which your browser supplies. They can tell if you found a site with their bug from a google search, what you searched for, and probably which page of results it was in.

      --
      09F91102 no, 455FE104 nope, F190A1E8 uh-uh, 7A5F8A09 that's not it, C87294CE no. Ah! 452F6E403CDF10714E41DFAA257D313F.
    4. Re:VisitorVille = spyware by pinchhazard · · Score: 0

      BTW I hope they're seeing lots of slashdot tornado's and riots at the moment... :)

      ...

      tornado's and riots

      Look at this.

      tornado's and riots

      Why did you use an apostrophe on one plural and not the other in the exact same context? I don't understand the logic here.

      Sieg Heil!

      --
      Do you love freedom??? Do you love freedom!!! DO YOU LOVE FREEDOM!!!!!!!!
    5. Re:VisitorVille = spyware by complete+loony · · Score: 1

      neither do I

      --
      09F91102 no, 455FE104 nope, F190A1E8 uh-uh, 7A5F8A09 that's not it, C87294CE no. Ah! 452F6E403CDF10714E41DFAA257D313F.
    6. Re:VisitorVille = spyware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look at this.
      My balls. Your chin.

  28. Microsoft employees and Google by TekPolitik · · Score: 4, Funny
    Microsoft employees use Google for their searches 66% of the time, but MSN Search only 20% of the time

    Nah. Microsoft employees use MSN search 99% of the time and Google 1% of the time. It's just that MSN search almost never finds anything useful so they don't click on the web sites found, hence nothing shows up in RefererLog files.

    1. Re:Microsoft employees and Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (+6, You owe me a new keyboard, you bastard!)

    2. Re:Microsoft employees and Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny, I suppose, but not true.

      Articles on /. itself about the beta MSN search showed that a very large portion of people found the MSN rsults to be a lot more relevant than google.

      But then, SMART people use multiple search engines always...

  29. Statistics by tuxter · · Score: 4, Funny

    And 78.35% of statistics are fabricated.....

    1. Re:Statistics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only 32.58% of the population knows that!

    2. Re:Statistics by grammar+fascist · · Score: 1

      And 78.35% of statistics are fabricated.....

      I read somewhere that it's a little closer to 78.352%.

      --
      I got my Linux laptop at System76.
    3. Re:Statistics by Zardus · · Score: 1

      Interestingly enough, every single time I hear (or say) the joke, its 78.something, which leads me to believe that the statistic isn't fabricated (or made up on the spot or whatever variation of the joke you use), but actually an accurate number which was quoted and put into a joke.

      Of course, the above post is completely fabricated.

      --
      You can mod your friends, you can mod your nose, but you can't mod your friend's nose.
    4. Re:Statistics by Stealth+Potato · · Score: 1

      And about 63.54435899% of statistics claim a level of precision far greater than their sampling methods warrant.

    5. Re:Statistics by LordEd · · Score: 1

      Speaking of statistics, i'm looking at a mirrordot version of the apple statistics (due to site being down from the ./ effect) and see that Safari is the browser of choice, with a + or - value of 5,059.56%.

      So, doesn't that mean that Safari is being used somewhere between 0% usage and 100% usage?

      The only thing i can tell for certain from that statistic is that IE6 is used no more than 18.43% of the time (8.26 +/- 10.18), aside from that, the other values all have a +/- of 100% or more.

    6. Re:Statistics by Viper233 · · Score: 1

      I believe you! ;}

    7. Re:Statistics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the remaining 45.28% are wrong.

  30. You know its true by t_allardyce · · Score: 5, Funny

    That 20% MSN search at Microsoft accounts for all the times Bill Gates or some other senior hovers over someones shoulder...

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  31. yah cause by geekoid · · Score: 1

    .21 seconds vs .43 seconds is sure the hell a lot faster...

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  32. Browser usage doesn't mean personal choice by Transcendent · · Score: 2, Informative

    At the company I work for (I'm not in the IT department of this one... shucks), we are forced to use IE because certian web applications we use for inter/intra department communication or data storage use asp or other activex controls.

    I asked specifically if I could get firefox installed (I don't have administration access on my desktop... ::sigh::), and one of the IT guys just said "we would, but our web apps only work with IE." Ah well...

    1. Re:Browser usage doesn't mean personal choice by damiam · · Score: 1

      You don't need admin access to install Firefox. Just download the zip and extract it in a user directory (My Documents or something). You can still use IE for web apps.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    2. Re:Browser usage doesn't mean personal choice by Bloody+Templar · · Score: 1

      At the company I work for we are forced to use IE because certian web applications we use for inter/intra department communication or data storage use asp or other activex controls.

      Hate to pick nits, but technically ASP is a server-side technology and is completely browser independent. Where you run into problems is with client-side VBScript, and, as you mentioned, ActiveX controls.

    3. Re:Browser usage doesn't mean personal choice by pcmanjon · · Score: 1

      "we are forced to use IE because certian web applications we use for inter/intra department communication or data storage use asp or other activex controls."

      ASP is a server-rendered language that is processed before being sent to the browser.

      Try http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/search.asp

      Shows up fine in Galeon on Linux for me... no ie here.

    4. Re:Browser usage doesn't mean personal choice by Transcendent · · Score: 1

      Yea, I know... but we have some guru coder here that likes to throw everything all into one (asp, but with tons of client side apps for program interfaces, file checks, etc)... I guess I got corrupted by the non-informed computer lingo that plauges the air here.

  33. I don't know about this VI (Virtual Intelligence) by redwoodtree · · Score: 2, Funny

    Personally, I prefer emacs.

  34. Breaking news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    VisitorVille has been /.'ed

    1. Re:Breaking news by MarkKnopfler · · Score: 2

      Nope ! it has been dot-slashed !

      ----

      Dear Slashdotter,

      We're sorry we missed you.

      In your infinite bounty, you have brought down our server.

      Please check back once the ./ effect has subsided. Here's the URL to bookmark: http://intelligence.visitorville.com

      Robert Savage, Mayor, VisitorVille

      --

  35. YOU CHICKENS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dear Slashdotter,

    We're sorry we missed you.

    In your infinite bounty, you have brought down our server.

    Please check back once the ./ effect has subsided. Here's the URL to bookmark: http://intelligence.visitorville.com

    Robert Savage, Mayor, VisitorVille

  36. Mirrors Here by Kinetic · · Score: 5, Informative

    Looks like their server is clobbered. MirrorDot has the mirrors.

    --
    ~Jay
    1. Re:Mirrors Here by casuist99 · · Score: 1

      Mirrordot successfully shows us the main page for each organization. Unfortunately, pages are only mirrored to a depth of ONE. Thus, we can't use mirrordot to actually SEE the stats for each organization. Got a link that works for those? I'm interested, but will forget all about the story by the time it's off the /. front page.

    2. Re:Mirrors Here by Julian352 · · Score: 1

      The problem is that only the main links are mirrored. The interesting information (like company details, data collection methods, etc.) are all on the main server and still slashdoted. That's the biggest negative of only doing the links.

    3. Re:Mirrors Here by grammar+fascist · · Score: 2, Funny

      New poll idea:

      Is it possible for MirrorDot.com to be any uglier?

      - Yes
      - No
      - Only if someone pukes on your monitor while you're reading it

      --
      I got my Linux laptop at System76.
    4. Re:Mirrors Here by shimen · · Score: 0

      i can't bare it but this site so uglay that MirrorDot.com looks pritty:

      http://mircosoft.com/

    5. Re:Mirrors Here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      its really fugly.

  37. Mirror... by bopo · · Score: 4, Funny

    Dear Slashdotter,

    We're sorry we missed you.

    In your infinite bounty, you have brought down our server.

    Please check back once the /. effect has subsided. Here's the URL to bookmark: http://intelligence.visitorville.com

    Thanks for your interest!

    Robert Savage, Mayor, VisitorVille

    --
    "Understand you're having a little Jimmy Page trouble."
    1. Re:Mirror... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, This is a complete, 100% copy of the text one gets when visiting the site. Is this worth a +3 funny?
      MODERATORS: READ THE FUCKING ARTICLE

    2. Re:Mirror... by CrkHead · · Score: 1
      And they have updated:
      Dear Visitor,

      We're sorry we missed you. Tonight our site appeared on Slashdot.org.

      And, in its infinite bounty, Slashdot brought down our server. We feel your pain. Literally.

      Please check back once the /. effect has subsided. Here's the URL to bookmark: http://intelligence.visitorville.com

      Thanks for your interest!

      VisitorVille's Mayor

    3. Re:Mirror... by duffster · · Score: 1

      You can still reach any of the pages linked by copying and pasting the link URL into a separate browser window, rather than clicking on it. It looks like they are checking the referer, and only displaying that message if you followed a link specifically from slashdot.org.

      Let the slashdotting recommence :-)

  38. We are away, feel free to clean the house. by ehack · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Nyahahahahaha:

    Dear Slashdotter,

    We're sorry we missed you.

    In your infinite bounty, you have brought down our server.

    Please check back once the /. effect has subsided. Here's the URL to bookmark: http://intelligence.visitorville.com

    Thanks for your interest!

    Robert Savage, Mayor, VisitorVille

    --
    This is not a signature.
  39. fact! by thhamm · · Score: 1

    1 of approx. 80^6 germans likes it that "Deutsche Telekom AG employees are the biggest users of Linux".

    1. Re:fact! by thhamm · · Score: 1

      uh. sorry. 80*10^6 germans only.

    2. Re:fact! by agent+dero · · Score: 1

      Now if the Telekom wasn't so worthless... ;)

      --
      Error 407 - No creative sig found
    3. Re:fact! by thhamm · · Score: 2, Funny

      :) so dumm war ich dann doch nich, darin zu investieren.

      hey, but tell me a german ISP who gives you hints how to set up your MTA, and their only comment at the end of the FAQ is "if you screw up, well kick you out". treasure that. .)

    4. Re:fact! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, sad fact is that Deutsche Telekom AG is a M$ house...those Linux boxes are just the corporate proxy farm.
      I should know since i'm maintaining that isle of hope.

      But Desktops are nearly 100% Windows 2k.

      Deutsche Telekom AG is from ground up Open Source unfriendly, they even asked me to stop working on OS projects in my spare time!

      --
      Anonymous Employee

    5. Re:fact! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Forgot to mention, the other half of the Linux boxes are Checkpoint firewalls running on RedHat.

      --
      Anonymous Employee

  40. cool - fresh data by kpharmer · · Score: 1

    they must be writing to a table...

  41. As a former sun employee.. by velo_mike · · Score: 4, Funny

    The only search engine they're using these days is Dice...

    --

    At the bottom of the endless pile of paper work which characterizes all regulation lies a gun.
    Alan Greenspan

    1. Re:As a former sun employee.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ouch!

  42. ISPs are interesting. by HyperChicken · · Score: 0

    More interesting than Google and Microsoft and all that are ISPs. Enter your ISPs name into the search, find it on the list, and check the browser and OS stats.

    --
    Free of Flash! Free of Flash!
    1. Re:ISPs are interesting. by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 1

      Enter your ISPs name into the search, find it on the list, and check the browser and OS stats.

      That's a good idea. I bet it's already been patented.

  43. mozilla/khtml by cyfer2000 · · Score: 2, Informative

    You can actually do some pretty nifty stuff in mozilla or khtml w/ XML/XSL, Javascript, DHTML and CSS.

    --
    There is a spark in every single flame bait point.
    1. Re:mozilla/khtml by cgenman · · Score: 1

      You can do some really nifty things in Mozilla or Konqueror or Opera or Safari with the alpha channel in PNGs.

      Do I sound bitter enough? Here, let my try to make years of seething annoyance show through.

      Man, you REALLY can do some NIFTY things with the PNG alpha channel in that EXCELLENTLY WRITTEN I.E. I'm sooooooo glad Microsoft promised that I.E. 4 would fully support PNG, and boy did they deliver in TRUE Microsoft style. These past SEVEN FRICKIN' YEARS have just flown by, with unnecessarily labor-intensive GIF background fudging a thing of the past.

      Bitter enough? Okay. You cry now.

    2. Re:mozilla/khtml by killjoe · · Score: 1

      Not to mention XUL..

      --
      evil is as evil does
  44. Browser User-Agent forgery by Indy+Media+Watch · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Isn't it possible the browser of choice is artificially skewed towards IE?

    I know a lot of users of other browsers spoof their user-agent to stop websites bitching about incompatible browsers.

    Mine is set to send IE6.0 WinXP even though I am probably using Lynx on an iPod.

    Equally, I imagine some Safari users are quite deliberately NOT spoofing anything to do a bit of evangelism.

    --

    Indy Media Watch-Proctologist of the Internet

    1. Re:Browser User-Agent forgery by vonFinkelstien · · Score: 1
      My bank (SEB in Sweden) would not allow me to log in with Safari, so I always hit the log in page normally, then I used "Debug/User Agent/Mozilla 1.1."

      Now they have finally allowed Safari users to log in and do banking without spoofing; however, they complain every time I log out telling me to upgrade my browser.

    2. Re:Browser User-Agent forgery by Indy+Media+Watch · · Score: 1

      Now they have finally allowed Safari users to log in and do banking without spoofing; however, they complain every time I log out telling me to upgrade my browser.

      So go to Software Update and upgrade Safari :-)

      --

      Indy Media Watch-Proctologist of the Internet

    3. Re:Browser User-Agent forgery by cgenman · · Score: 2, Informative

      Opera now spoofs as I.E. by default, and has for about two years.

    4. Re:Browser User-Agent forgery by jazman · · Score: 1

      > Mine is set to send IE6.0 WinXP even though I am probably using Lynx on an iPod.

      Probably? Don't you know?

  45. How calculated? by theobscurest · · Score: 1

    Didn't catch the full article before it got slashdotted, but it would be interesting to know how these statistics were calculated. It would make a big difference if they were calculated by official audits/inventories or rather by random surveys of company employees. Imagine how your non-technical employees would respond..

  46. Did you know... by Hikaru79 · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Did you know that 68.56% of people are easily impressed by statistics? :o

  47. We got banned! by mikeb39 · · Score: 5, Funny

    While I was working with a network admin at a local highschool, the entire district got banned from Slashdot for "abuse" that appeared we were trying to dos them or somesuch. Of course we just assumed it was the district, but as it turned out, all the schools in the province are connected to a massive network that provides bandwidth for every school. So every school in the province got banned, that's thousands of IT workers and whoever the heck knows how many geeky kids who were suddenly greated with a big red screen. It took a few emails to slashdot to finally get them to unblock it, and the problem as it turned out was some kind of a router looping explosion thing. Sorry, boring story and I forgot the details. And the point. But I got this far, so *submit button*

    1. Re:We got banned! by floydman · · Score: 1

      Actually i am facing the same problem. My provider is bacnned on /. (i dont know why)... i am writing this from work

      --
      The lunatic is in my head
    2. Re:We got banned! by andrewbaldwin · · Score: 1

      me too!

      I've contacted Slashdot and my ISP (NTL - whose cache server has the offending IP address).

      One side effect is that I'm condemned to access Slashdot from work - clock up one more WinXP/IE6 user instead of Linux/Firefox :(

    3. Re:We got banned! by smacktits · · Score: 1

      Since when is NTL banned? I know for a fact my friend writes on here frequently from home, and he uses NTL.

      I personally use Blueyonder. NTL are just shit.

    4. Re:We got banned! by andrewbaldwin · · Score: 1

      Don't know if NTL per se is banned - just that the IP address which is causing me to be banned is that of an NTL cache server (which I assume is a proxy through which I get my access).

      Your friend may be going via a different proxy/cache - if so good luck to him ;-)

    5. Re:We got banned! by smacktits · · Score: 1

      Ohhh, sorry, I didn't read that part of your original post. My bad (:

  48. Recently: Lots using Skype to meet others... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Especially in Asia & Africa, but - FAIK -
    also elsewhere... where ever someone has
    "too little) to do at the office, I guess. ;-)

  49. Al Gore. DID NOT invent the net. by Man+in+Spandex · · Score: 0, Troll

    The next person to say that Al Gore invented the internet will have his dick chopped off.

    1. Re:Al Gore. DID NOT invent the net. by Man+in+Spandex · · Score: 1

      Troll? Wow you people sure know how to mod somebody or detect sense of humor.

      A simple google search http://www.google.ca/search?hl=en&q=did+al+gore+in vent+internet&btnG=Google+Search&meta=

      will clearly show the obvious that we all know that he helped in the modernization of the internet to the public to turn it into what it is today. He did not "invent" it as many /.ers already know.

    2. Re:Al Gore. DID NOT invent the net. by j_snare · · Score: 1

      I thought the mods (Troll) on your post as well as the parent (Flamebait) were both in poor taste, really. They're both funny.

      Seriously, yes, everyone knows that Al Gore didn't actually think he invented the internet. However, he did play a part in getting the public into it. The fun part is that he *said* that he invented the internet, which, taken literally, is really quite fun to poke at. Everyone just relax, these Al Gore jokes are to be laughed at, not taken seriously. Just like he was. :D

    3. Re:Al Gore. DID NOT invent the net. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We all know Gore didn't invent the Internet. He just opened his liberal yap and claimed to have invented it. You know, taking credit for something he didn't actually do, like most other liberal politicians.

  50. Here's a small sample by ravenspear · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I recently hosted a mirror of an image in one of my posts that got around 800 hits. This was what my stats were for that.

    Browser Version:

    Firefox - 39.8%
    MS IE - 19%
    Curl - 14.1% (probably high because it was an image)
    Unknown - 9.3%
    Mozilla - 4.9%
    Others - 4.4%
    Opera - 3.1%
    Safari - 2.8%
    Konqueror - 1.9%
    Netscape - 0.3%

    OS Version:

    Windows - 56.7%
    Linux - 25%
    Unknown - 13.9%
    Macintosh - 3.6%
    FreeBSD - 0.5%
    Unknown Unix System - 0.1%

    1. Re:Here's a small sample by killjoe · · Score: 1

      14% unknown? What gives? What unkown OS is/are being used three times more then a mac?

      --
      evil is as evil does
    2. Re:Here's a small sample by Krunch · · Score: 1

      Got 228 hits with slashdot in the referer.

      35.53% (81) Firefox
      25.88% (59) MSIE
      09.65% (22) libwww-perl/5.76
      05.26% (12) BecomeBot
      02.19% (05) Opera
      01.32% (03) wget
      00.88% (02) Konqueror
      00.88% (02) Camino
      00.88% (02) Safari
      15.35% (35) others starting with "Mozilla"
      01.32% (03) other bots
      00.88% (02) unknown

      OS:
      64.04% (146) Windows
      12.72% (029) Linux (4 Debian)
      02.63% (006) Mac (all OS X)
      02.19% (005) FreeBSD
      18.42% (042) bots, wget and unknowns

      All the libwww-perl things are from Slashdot itself (same IP). Here is an example:
      66.35.250.150 - - [22/Jun/2004:18:58:50 +0200] "GET http://slashdot.org/ok.txt HTTP/1.0" 404 277 "-" "libwww-perl/5.76"

      --
      No GNU has been Hurd during the making of this comment.
    3. Re:Here's a small sample by dajak · · Score: 1

      I wonder how many people use Firefox with the user agent extension, pretending to be an IE user to be able to use their banking software.

    4. Re:Here's a small sample by daijo78 · · Score: 2, Funny

      You guys should try out Unknown! It rocks! I've been running it on my Unknown Unix System for about a month and I'm very pleased with it's performance. Best part, absolutely NO EXPLOITS!

    5. Re:Here's a small sample by zBoD · · Score: 1, Funny

      > FreeBSD - 0.5%

      Your logs confirm it: FreeBSD is dying

      --
      BoD
  51. What if... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm connected through a phone line, you insensitive clod!

  52. iMac user by SethJohnson · · Score: 1



    All joking aside, I've seen a photo somewhere of him using an iMac. The second-generation swivel-neck type.

    1. Re:iMac user by Saige · · Score: 1

      Aah, that was just a Speak 'N Spell, specially modified so as to not make the shrub look like the utter moron he truly is.

      On the other hand, Cheney has a direct mind link from his cybernetic brain directly into WOPR.

      --
      "You know your god is man-made when he hates all the same people you do."
    2. Re:iMac user by SethJohnson · · Score: 1



      Ha-ha!!! That's f-ing hilarious!

    3. Re:iMac user by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All joking aside, that was simply a pose. GWB does not use a computer.

  53. Servers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    86% use servers that are not powerful enough to withstand the Slashdot effect.

  54. Browser Loyalty by fm6 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Nowadays, I'm a diehard Firefox user -- but only because they've finally taken the lead on Internet Explorer in security and reliability. For years, I used IE, giving Mozilla or Netscape a chance every six months or so, and always going away disgusted with its bugginess and slugishness.

    Back in 1998, I was working for the Java division of Sun, where we relied on the "Intranet" long before it was a word. Most documents, both internal, and external, were in HTML. Which makes a really good web browser really important. And yet we were stuck with the Solaris port of Netscape 4.7. Buggy, sluggish, screwed up my X-Windows palette, crashed once an hour -- and it didn't provide headers and footers for printouts! I was working as a tech writer, reading and producing a lot of documents, so this was a major crimp in my productivity. I finally broke the No Microsoft Rule and installed IE for Solaris on my workstation.

    That's all the brand loyalty you can expect from techies -- give them something that works, or they're gone.

    1. Re:Browser Loyalty by bobintetley · · Score: 1

      I was working at Sun this time last year and I was STILL stuck on Netscape 4.7/Solaris along with the other 1,000 or so staff at Guillemont Park in the UK

      Even worse, the setup was Sunray/terminal services with no admin access so we couldn't even change it. Ugh.

    2. Re:Browser Loyalty by fm6 · · Score: 1
      That speaks to the big issue I used to have with Sun's IS department. The IS people were all competent and intelligent (which is more than can be said for a lot of IS departments), but as a unit they seemed unable to keep up with the changing needs of the people they were supporting.

      This became an issue my very first day of work, when I couldn't access web sites outside the Sun firewall. Netscape was preconfigured with a script to identify and use the correct gateway -- but the script was way out of date and nonfunctional. I had to call IS and get the correct settings. OK, a small incident. But multiply it by the cost of answering that call for every new hire.

      We had problems with overburdened networks and unreliable servers. Everybody who could ran all their software locally, even though this was against policy, because they couldn't trust the network to be available. But most of us couldn't do this, because there was a recent ban on handing out superuser passwords. (If you had a CD-ROM, you could get around this by re-installing Solaris -- but new people didn't have CD-ROMs!) I finally managed to get my superuser password, because my automounter kept crashing, and IS got tired of coming by to restart it for me. Without that password, I couldn't have installed my own browser, or done a lot of other stuff that made a lot of difference to my productivity.

      The ultimate irony was the constant shortage of disk space. Ironic not just because we worked for a company that made file servers. But also because there terabytes of unused disk space on the workstations. You weren't supposed to keep data locally, because there was no backup for workstation data. Sun sells distributed backup software, but IS seemed to have no interest in deploying it internally.

      Both our "everything on the server" and your Sunray setup are a result of a decision to centralize resources. There are good reasons to do it this way -- but it's not gonna work if you don't provide the resources to make it work.

  55. But why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...would he need to do it on xbox live when he's doing it in real life.

  56. Well...Microsoft let one slip by dantheman82 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    MSDN Student Flash, a student-focused blog that is part of the MSDN blogs, has come out with a blog entry about Firefox. Who in Microsoft let this one slip?

    It's an awesome post, though...

    --
    This sig donated to Pater. Long live /.
  57. Personally,.... by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    I thought I saw him with an etch-a-scetch.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:Personally,.... by richie2000 · · Score: 1
      I thought I saw him with an etch-a-scetch.

      With an "Internets-ready" sticker next to the "Shake to reset" sticker.

      --
      Money for nothing, pix for free
  58. VisitorVille's Mayor feels our pain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dear Visitor,

    We're sorry we missed you. Tonight our site appeared on Slashdot.org.

    And, in its infinite bounty, Slashdot brought down our server. We feel your pain. Literally.

    Please check back once the /. effect has subsided. Here's the URL to bookmark: http://intelligence.visitorville.com

    Thanks for your interest!

    VisitorVille's Mayor

  59. Why Doesn't Slashdot Give Credit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Once again, Slashdot gives no credit to whoever actually did all the research, or if the anonymous poster actually did it, which blog told him about the site. Quite a respectable news organization you've got here, what with anonymous users posting plagiarized research and non-credited links. So, who did he not credit?

    http://blog.outer-court.com/archive/2005_01_03_ind ex.html#110478296722920293
    http://google.blognewschannel.com/index.php/archiv es/2005/01/03/what-search-engines-do-search-engine -companies-use/
    http://demiliani.com/blog/archive/2005/01/03/2024. aspx
    http://blog.comego.net/2005/01/visitorville-intell igence.html
    http://www.uneasysilence.com/index.php?p=1876

    1. Re:Why Doesn't Slashdot Give Credit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As the AC that submitted it, I heard about it here, but went through and did all the linking and such myself. (There are links in that blog, and while some are the same, I did my own searching/gathering and did not cut/paste.)

  60. /. strikes again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where can i get a piece of this infinite bounty, I need some new shoes...

  61. You spelled "bananna" wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It should have 3 ns: banannna

  62. What about pr0n? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sure there is a stat that says 69% of the time employees are searching for "hot pussy cock" over at Morgan Stanley / Chase in between "Growth Funds" and "Anti-Index".

    BALLLLOOOOOOOOOOBA!

  63. Yes, the efforts were a very relatively by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...What the hell is this? It reads like the subject line of a Korean spam email.

    1. Re:Yes, the efforts were a very relatively by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a craptroll. Ignore it and it gets modded down.

  64. slashdotted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the definition of slashdotted

    Dear Visitor,

    We're sorry we missed you. Tonight our site appeared on Slashdot.org.

    And, in its infinite bounty, Slashdot brought down our server. We feel your pain. Literally.

    Please check back once the /. effect has subsided. Here's the URL to bookmark: http://intelligence.visitorville.com

    Thanks for your interest!

    VisitorVille's Mayor

    1. Re:slashdotted by Master+Ben · · Score: 1

      Ummmm, No!

  65. Firefox takes a generation to start or get killed by vensub · · Score: 0, Redundant

    ... and loading web pages takes for ever. Why are the open source people are blind? I am not a fan of MSFT though! My hands freezes like firefox in the middle!

    Is it another netscape which behaved the same way?

  66. 10.53% of Google Employees Use Unknown Browser by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Perhaps Google's coming out with their own branded browser. Those clever tricksters, can't hide from us!

  67. Microsoft browser use by serutan · · Score: 1

    Firefox is their second most popular browser behind Internet Explorer 6's whopping 98.76% share.

    You have to realize that Microsoft employees have practically no choice about using IE because MS pretty much runs its business on internal websites written for IE. But in my years there on and off as a contractor MANY people have told me they prefer to use Netscape, Firefox, etc. at home for various reasons.

    1. Re:Microsoft browser use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hmmmm news to me, after many years working there very few of us use or prefer Netscape or firefox, I run them at home only to test and see how buggy they still are every version :-)

  68. Slashdotted ! by Gurukhan · · Score: 1

    QUOTE
    Dear Visitor, We're sorry we missed you. Tonight our site appeared on Slashdot.org. And, in its infinite bounty, Slashdot brought down our server. We feel your pain. Literally. Please check back once the /. effect has subsided. Here's the URL to bookmark: http://intelligence.visitorville.com Thanks for your interest! VisitorVille's Mayor
    ENDQUOTE

    --
    -- We are born naked, wet and hungry. Then things get worse.
  69. hah by GoClick · · Score: 0

    mod up parent that's -funny-

  70. Mod Parent Down--Uninformed by Noksagt · · Score: 1

    When I used Opera, I had the UserAgent set to IE. I think this might have been the default.

  71. The obvious question. by killjoe · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why not code to standards so that all browsers get the same interface?

    --
    evil is as evil does
    1. Re:The obvious question. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe because not all browsers have such a feature rich API as IE. Mainly because MS is way ahead on the broweser capabilities than any prissy standards committee.

    2. Re:The obvious question. by JahToasted · · Score: 1

      They do, just that they use Microsoft's standards not the W3C standards. Everyone knows that open standards are like a virus and should be avoided at all costs, right?

    3. Re:The obvious question. by Kehvarl · · Score: 1

      Maybe because not all browsers have such a feature rich API as IE. Mainly because MS is way ahead on the broweser capabilities than any prissy standards committee.

      Assuming IE is so far ahead of everything else, explain why it doesn't have full CSS2 support.

    4. Re:The obvious question. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have been trolled

    5. Re:The obvious question. by Kehvarl · · Score: 1

      /me tosses breadcrumbs to the trolls

  72. How I assume they did this by the+frizz · · Score: 1
    1. Collect lots of logs with client IP addresses and User Agents from various popular web sites.
      Since www.visitorville.com is in the business of providing web stats, they are probably aggregating stats from many of their customers.
    2. Get the mapping of which IP address blocks are owned by which companies.
      You can get them the registries (e.g., ARIN, RIPE , APNIC) by asking nicely and agreeing to use them for marketing.
    3. Write some software that dissects user agents and OS from the User-Agent value and counts occurrences per per IP address block owner.
    PS: www.visitorville.com is not currently down like intelligence.visitorville.com is. And it was previously mentioned on Slashdot.
    1. Re:How I assume they did this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhh.... Yeah. Why are you telling us this? Anyone with more than 1 week of computing usage could have figured that out.

  73. Proxy servers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I work at a large ISP and we use a proxy server for all external Internet-traffic.
    I could imagine corps like MS and Google do the same.
    Wouldn't this mess up such statistics a bit?

  74. Re:Firefox takes a generation to start or get kill by _spider_ · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Heh, I think you are alone (or in a very very small percentage) for Firefox to be slow.

    On all my machines in our offices, Firefox is pretty much the de'facto on speed. Mine is up nearly instantaneously, loads pages wickedly fast, and in general, runs fantastic in any of our Windows, Linux and Macintosh workstations.

    --
    '/dev/wit' is not available.
  75. When you thought you seen everything on ebay by sonicimpulse · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&rd=1 &item=5548444803&ssPageName=STRK:MESE:IT

    1. Re:When you thought you seen everything on ebay by shimen · · Score: 0

      And 100% of offtopic posters get modded -1 and offtopic by 80% of readers

  76. slashdotted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Coralize links!

  77. Today's news in education by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    98% of all internet users failed English.

  78. Re:Firefox takes a generation to start or get kill by Johan+Palmqvist · · Score: 1

    Load Firefox at the same time Windows loads, just like IE does, and you might think that it loads faster, just like IE makes you think. ;)

    Web pages render much faster in Firefox than in IE for me. But I'm using Linux of course and only use IE for testing purposes. :)

  79. Unknown to the people gathering the data by blorg · · Score: 1

    14% unknown? What gives? What unkown OS is/are being used three times more then a mac?

    It's not that it is some mysterious unknown operating system, just that *they* don't know what it is. People behind certain types of firewall or proxy that strip the browser agent, for example. The 'unknowns' are likely all using a roughly proportionate mix of the other operating systems featured.

  80. slashdotted by gothzilla · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    There are a few things that are beyond common knowledge.

    1. posting a link on slashdot will cause that link to see a massive surge in traffic

    2. posting multiple links to different pages in a website will multiply this already huge effect

    3. the slashdot effect will almost always take down a site and/or cost the site owner thousands of dollars in bandwidth

    Knowing these things couldn't one argue that posting a non-coralized or non-cached link on slashdot is the equivalent of a malicious DDOS attack which could cause legal repercussions? Would it really be that hard to take the tag and make it automatically coralized?

  81. & political parties? by jago25_98 · · Score: 1

    Shame there aren't results based on political parties.

    Though I expect the results will be as I expect them too and voting doesn't seem to count for much anyway.

  82. Re:Firefox takes a generation to start or get kill by Ill_At_Ease · · Score: 1

    The only reasons Firefox will load slow are there are a ton of badly scripted pop up links or your server is being slammed. Probably the latter. Other than that, you can tweak the about:config to make Firefox even quicker.

  83. Low Mozilla usage within Google. by dep01 · · Score: 1

    Huh... I'm a little surprised that more people within Google aren't using Mozilla/Firefox. I recently read about their exhaustive hiring process... You'd think they'd get more employees who knew a good browser when they saw one :)

    --
    "hey, could you pass me a paper towel? er.. I mean... DEPLOY ABSORBTION PANEL!"
  84. i can't help myself... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    you forgot
    4. Profit!


    Sorry, I just watched the episode last night.
  85. Information Faulty by shanman · · Score: 1

    This information is, at best, misleading. I checked out several companies of which I know the approximate makeup of OS/Browsers and the data returned wasn't even close. In one case, not even one percent was returned for the >90% deployed operating system/browser (Win98/IE5).

    Obviously they have some data, but since a lot of corporations don't actually browse from the netblocks they own for serving websites (they use different connections typically for employees)

  86. Re:In Soviet Russia... by suman28 · · Score: 0

    Wasn't that the theme, in Minority Report and in I, Robot?. That is acutally funny.

  87. Numbers must be wrong by Blitzenn · · Score: 1

    Nobody can tell me that someone at Google has not ever used soemthing other than google for searching. If they haven't ever tried the competition, then I would say they will not last very long if they won't look at what they are doing. They must look at the others to see how they compare. Therefore 100% cannot possibly be correct.

  88. Widely diverse? by tepples · · Score: 1

    as a company, it is in our best interest to make as many products work on a widely diverse set of platforms.

    Where can I pick up a copy of Microsoft Office compiled for Solaris OS on SPARC architecture? I'd imagine that if Microsoft can get something working in GNU/Linux, FreeBSD, and Solaris operating systems, it would be able to delay some firms' migration to OpenOffice.org by a few months to a few years.

  89. ASP and its libraries by tepples · · Score: 1

    ASP is a server-rendered language

    If a language specifies a standard library, you must take the library implementation into account when evaluating the language implementation. I'd imagine that a lot of the code emitted by the libraries that come with the ASP server relies on ActiveX controls or MSHTML quirks or both.

  90. Not that reliable, right? by Peter+Cooper · · Score: 1

    I tried their site but couldn't work out how they're getting these stats. From what I can make out, these people run some sort of counter company.. so they're getting their stats from hits to certain sites, right?

    That being the case, it seems a bit dumb to guess that Microsoft uses Google X% of the time, because it's only true on a small subset of data. Without having Google's access logs, you can't possibly say that with any authority.

  91. 100% is such an ugly number by ExtraT · · Score: 1

    When I see 100% in a statistical result, it makes me cringe. The results of this study are under very big question.

  92. This is crap by SavoWood · · Score: 1

    I looked up my company and saw we were 100% WinXP. That's a load of crap.

    I look around at the machines I'm supporting. I see mostly OS X machines, and the few Windows machines are Win2K. I just opened two laptop boxes which came pre-installed with XP, but they're not even on the network, yet.

    The stats on this site are severely skewed. I don't know where they get their data, but it's very wrong.

    --
    Plant a tree in a developing country.