Slashdot Mirror


Hewlett-Packard To Offer Linux-based Media Hub

Sammy at Palm Addict writes "According to the New York Times, Hewlett-Packard is to offer a new digital media hub based on Linux," excerpting "Hewlett-Packard will introduce a new device this fall meant to record and play back television as well as organize digital media, including photos, music and video, the company said yesterday. Hewlett already offers similar devices based on Microsoft's Windows Media Center Edition. The device, called the HP Media Hub, will be based on the Linux operating system." Since HP also sells self-branded iPods, it would be great if they'd make such a box iPod friendly.

184 comments

  1. Late to the party... by gubbas · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It would be nice to HP announce something that hasn't already been done before... Where is the "invent" in this?

    --
    "What I need is an exact list of specific unknown problems we might encounter."
    1. Re:Late to the party... by bebopredux · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hey....anyone getting Linux out there gets a nod by me. I say kudos to HP for doing this.

    2. Re:Late to the party... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      How does the first post get modded as redundant?

    3. Re:Late to the party... by EnderWiggnz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      too bad it'll get axed by carly as soon as it doesnt produce buillions in revenue, immediately.

      but yes, kudos to hp for doing something linux.

      --
      ... hi bingo ...
    4. Re:Late to the party... by I+r+CommanderCool · · Score: 1

      it will just be used to download windows *eye roll*

  2. Pretty sparse article by 14erCleaner · · Score: 3, Interesting
    No indication whether it'll be DRM-crippled.

    Of course, this is the new, evil, HP, so I guess I shouldn't get my hopes up.

    --
    Have you read my blog lately?
    1. Re:Pretty sparse article by brokencomputer · · Score: 4, Funny

      Which new evil HP? Did HP used to be good? Has HP always been evil? What makes HP evil now? I might be out of the loop...

    2. Re:Pretty sparse article by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 4, Informative

      Broadcast flag? Check. It's required by law.

      OpenCable DRM? Check. It's built in to the standard.

    3. Re:Pretty sparse article by Bloater · · Score: 4, Funny

      It is a different HP, the old godly HP is a brown spicey sauce that British members of parliament enjoy in their bacon and egg sarnies.

    4. Re:Pretty sparse article by Billly+Gates · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You may want to read the comments on this story and past HP stories for all the details.

      HP like IBM was a different company in the past. They were once known for their engineering, ingenuity, innovativeness, and big R&D.

      Today they are becoming the walmart of the pc industry while still charging high prices. Also they made some questionable business decisions in terms of their superior products. For example killing the alpha processor because they already invested billions in the sinking Itanium to killing off the clustering in the superior Digital Unix and using a vendor to write a lower quality clustering solution for HP-UX, etc.

      Also do not get me started on the calculators. They are practically non existent anymore as HP killed them off.

      HP has turned into a short sighted company who makes substandard products and does not look at the long term effects.

      I for one would never trust an HP printer or server made after 2001 as a result. They are just not good anymore and frankly are still expensive.

      Many slashdotters who have a grudge agaisnt HP were probably former HP customers and loyalists.

    5. Re:Pretty sparse article by trparky · · Score: 1

      No DRM? Yeah right, not if the MPAA and Hollywood has anything to say about it! The MPAA and Hollywood would be raising major amounts of hell if this thing didn't have some sort of DRM technology built in.

    6. Re:Pretty sparse article by prozac79 · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Many slashdotters who have a grudge agaisnt HP were probably former HP customers and loyalists

      Or they were once employed by HP or Compaq before the dark times... before Carly.

      --
      "Oh dear, she's stuck in an infinite loop and he's an idiot" -Prof. Farnsworth (Futurama)
    7. Re:Pretty sparse article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see that they have a partnership with www.mediabolic.com

      It seems to me that they are rebranding mediabolic's product and selling it as an HP product.

      One interesting note about mediabolic.com is that they are almost completely funded by members of the church of Scientology.

    8. Re:Pretty sparse article by shokk · · Score: 2, Funny

      A young pupil of mine named Carly Fiorina killed the old Compaq and helped hunt down the last of the good ones. Search your feelings, you know this to be true.

      --
      "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master."
    9. Re:Pretty sparse article by Omniscientist · · Score: 1
      Also do not get me started on the calculators. They are practically non existent anymore as HP killed them off.

      Are you saying HP has effectively destroyed all competition in the calculator market? I have seen very few HP calculators in my life, most of the calculators were in fact Texas Instruments.

    10. Re:Pretty sparse article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Leaving aside the other points, blaming Carly for the decline of the calculator market is pretty unfair. For the price of a top-line calculator in the 1980s you can now get a combination PDA/phone/camera. Who's going to buy a calculator when they can run a math program on an ipaq (or scheme or python or APL or spreadsheet or calculator emulator)? Nothing HP could have done could prevent the "calculator" function being subsumed into one function of a general device.

      (Well, people might buy $10 calculators, but that is no business for HP.)

      Now, if you want to argue that HP should have parlayed it's calculator business into a more dynamic PDA/phone offering you might have a point.

    11. Re:Pretty sparse article by Alsee · · Score: 1

      No indication whether it'll be DRM-crippled.

      No indication in that lame NYT peice, but C|NET is quite clear that HP is will be producing DRM crippled crap:

      HP readies TVs, media hub products
      Hewlett-Packard plans to announce by next week a set of home entertainment products, including large-screen TVs and a digital storage console, embedded with copy protection technology.


      Yet another product that I absolutely positively will NEVER spend a single cent on, except perhaps specifically to help fix (aka crack) the DRM.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    12. Re:Pretty sparse article by herrison · · Score: 1

      Hey, that's the first time a slashdot comment has made me dribble!

      --
      You know what I miss? Leeches.
    13. Re:Pretty sparse article by cshark · · Score: 1

      It is a different HP, the old godly HP is a brown spicey sauce that British members of parliament enjoy in their bacon and egg sarnies.

      Yes... it might be delicious, but can it compute the value of pi?

      --

      This signature has Super Cow Powers

    14. Re:Pretty sparse article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've said it before, I'll say it again.
      This community is nuts!

      You guys'll love any company that you perceive as the underdog that employs open solutions, but then you turn on it like rabid dogs when that company does anything even remotely market conscious, or worse yet, ends up being pervasive in the industry.

      I don't get it.
      HP is bigger now than it's ever been before. They have more patents, a larger market share, and over all more success all around. And contrary to what many in this post will have you believe, they're still a Linux company. In fact, they're one of the big ones, with people, capital, advertising, and other resources devoted to the development and promotion of Linux based solutions... especially in the enterprise.

      The reaction here (to good news), blows my mind.
      As Linux enthusiasts, how can you possibly dislike HP?

      So they're successful in the consumer market. So what? They're successful in many of the same areas as IBM, who is one of the good guys at the moment. They must be doing something right, don't you think?

      Ah fuck it, I give up.

  3. QNX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "The device, called the HP Media Hub, will be based on the Linux operating system."

    They could have also used QNX for stability and it's sutability for real-time (of which media is).

    1. Re:QNX by garcia · · Score: 2, Interesting

      They could have also used QNX for stability and it's sutability for real-time (of which media is).

      My Tivo has never crashed and it runs Linux. QNX also costs money to license eh? Linux doesn't. Personally, my media just isn't THAT important that I'd be willing to plop down even more money on a set-top-box just so that it was "more stable" than my Tivo.

    2. Re:QNX by Jason+Earl · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This isn't about hacking your digital hub, this is about the economics of operating systems. Basically HP is telling Microsoft that they like the Windows Media idea, but that HP doesn't like the idea of paying Microsoft to implement it. HP has finally realized that the average Joe isn't interested in running MS Word on their television, and so there isn't really any reason to pay Microsoft for the privilege of using Windows. This isn't an issue of Free Software, but of commodity software. That's why HP isn't using QNX. HP isn't interested in paying the folks that develop QNX any more than they are interested in paying the folks in Redmond.

    3. Re:QNX by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      My TiVo only crashed three times in the two years I've had it. Unplug power, replug power, and you're done. I'll still take that over paying extra in QNX licensing fees.

    4. Re:QNX by GeorgeNorton · · Score: 1

      From the article: "The real motive is not the cost," she added, but "the ease of use and simplicity."

      lol

    5. Re:QNX by Jason+Earl · · Score: 2, Funny

      That just goes to show that for all her faults Carly has a pretty good grasp of marketing.

    6. Re:QNX by mattyrobinson69 · · Score: 1

      im guessing she meant the apparently great v4l2 api built into linux, which i assume hp would be using.

  4. Wont work by mboverload · · Score: 5, Informative

    Of course, this will not let you transfer recorded shows to other computers on the the network. MythTV is currently the only "media hub" that does not have copy protection, or give away freedoms in any way.

    1. Re:Wont work by superpulpsicle · · Score: 1

      I was almost sold to the idea of TiVO.

      Then MythTV came by.

      Then I heard Comcast would be doing something.

      Then I heard SBC would offer something.

      But M$ media center has been around.

      But it's technically no different with regular XP and snapstream Media.

      Then this HP wannabe device is coming out.

      Did I miss anything?

    2. Re:Wont work by Rei · · Score: 1

      I'm considering "MythTV"izing my home setup (I dl'ed and installed the packages last night, but still need to redo some wiring and configure the thing). Is it as good as it sounds?

      --
      Seen on a Japanese food processor: "Not to be used for the other use."
    3. Re:Wont work by JWW · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes....

      Once you get it running.

    4. Re:Wont work by GeorgieBoy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I've run Mythtv for over a year. I've been using:

      -Hauppauge PVR-250 hardware mpeg-encoding TV cards (though newer models are coming out to replace these, but driver support probably isn't as good yet). Note that cards without mpeg-encoding in hardware demand a far faster system: and I tried those first, then bought 2 PVR-250s. -various remotes, including Hauppauge black (crappy) and gray (good) -nvidia card with SVideo out -external firewire DVD burner to archive shows

      -a couple 120GB Seagate HDs set in LVM as storage Since the PVR-250 is an MPEG2 encoder, it's not too much trouble to export them to DVD. Editing/exporting the streams to remove commericials can be a bit annoying, though I think nuvexport can help with this.

      Note this setup is more expensive (in the short run) than just going with a prefab DVR solution with monthly fees associated with it, but you do have a great deal more control over your recorded content. It will probably take a lot for me to be parted with my setup.

    5. Re:Wont work by sulli · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Isn't KnoppixMyth the thing here? (Install off a CD - that's what I have heard. I am hoping to build such a thing shortly.)

      --

      sulli
      RTFJ.
    6. Re:Wont work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      How do you find the quality of the s-video out when viewed on your TV? I have an ATI Radeon 9600 PRO, and the s-video out is not that sharp and the colours aren't as brilliant as I would like.

      I was relly thinking about getting a PVR-250 (I'm using a software compression capture card at the moment), but now I am wondering if I should go with the PVR-350 as I understand it has s-video out on that card. Has anyone tried the PVR-350? Will it's video out be better than going thru my video crd? Is it worth the extra $$$ over the PVR-250?

    7. Re:Wont work by mikolas · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I have a diskless MythTV setup w/ Hauppauge PVR-250, DVD drive and 5.1 decoder. It really is excellent as you basically only have one piece of hardware for all your media needs. And as I boot from a server using PXE, the MythTV frontend is also silent (all the DVR STBs I've tried produce more noise).

    8. Re:Wont work by JWW · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, KnoppixMyth is out there.

      But its no fun if you don't get your hands a little dirty. ;-)

    9. Re:Wont work by dcgaber · · Score: 1

      I use a pvr-350 and the quality is fine for me (as other myth users will tell you). Though I am on a puny 19 or 21 inch tv, so it is not the best test.

      However, there are many things I can't do with the pvr-350, no mythgames, no mythmusic visualizations, no playing divx or mpeg-4 content. This is fine for me, it just serves as a tivo for me, and the occasional (s)vcd I throw at it. Obviously, it is not fine for others.

      What some folks do is get a VGA->s-video cable that seems to work pretty well. I suggest reading the archives of the myth-users list (at gossamer.com I believe) to find out more on that option.

    10. Re:Wont work by evilviper · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've tried MythTV, and found it to be terribly lowsy. The interface is poor, it uses it's own stupid format, seeking is quite slow, your local media files have to be accessed through a different sub-sub-menu (and MythTV has a lot of sub-sub-sub-menus), and it's conflict resolution/priority system seems massively over-complex to me.

      In addition, if you are going to be doing software encoding, MythTV has terribly lowsy quality at even very high bitrates, and yet eats up tons of CPU power to do it. It's been some time since I tried MythTV, but I doubt much has changed.

      Freevo might be a much better bet, but I was turned-off at the channel setup step, and decided it would be far quiker and easier for me to write a few shell scripts using mencoder for recording, and a simple file manager that opens video files with mplayer.

      I was doing this with a cheapo analog capture card (and eating up CPU cycles encoding to MPEG4 in realtime with mencoder), but hearing the rave reviews about the Hauppauge PVR 250/350, I spent the money to get a PVR250, and found the quality to be no better than what I was getting, and the hardware encoder requires massive bitrates (4000K ie. 2GBs/hr) to produce video without artifacts, whereas mencoder would easily produce video at 1/4 the bitrate, at about the same quality.

      If you want to roll your own, instead of using Freevo/MythTV, here's a few tips:

      webvcr+ provides a nice web interface to schedule recordings, and uses mysql and xmltv to get listings, just as MythTV does. Also install Links 2.0, so you have a web browser that you can navigate easily using your remove. Just bind a key on your remote to launch links (in GUI mode) and open a page to your webvcr+ interface.

      I recomend using any old filemanager, and a bare-minimal window manager (I use blackbox). Then something like bbkeys to bind a remote-control button to open the filemanager to your "videos/" folder, and you're pretty-much set. Just go up/down to your files, and hit "OK" to play them.

      I also have some very basic shell-scripts, which allow me to edit my files in avidemux2, re-encode them to smaller bitrates (if I want to save them), make a data CD out of any number of video files, or re-encode them to VCDs/SVCDs/DVDs any of which can be played on most DVD players. etc, etc. These are things you can't do from within MythTV's interface, but any simple filemanager will have no problem with.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    11. Re:Wont work by Azghoul · · Score: 1

      Your setup intrigues me, so I'm replying for two reasons: 1, can you provide a link to learning more about how to set this stuff up, and 2, so I can come back through my own comments someday to look this up and google what you're talking about.

      The diskless bit is most interesting, I think.

    12. Re:Wont work by mikolas · · Score: 2, Informative

      The diskless setup was fairly easy using Debian: Debian Diskless. However, the actual kernel configuration was initially a pain as I used 2.6.9 vanilla kernel w/ LIRC backported manually and IVTV drivers manually compiled for the PVR-250. What I'd suggest is to do a minimal local setup first using something like Fedora Core 3 as it should support the hardware out-of-the-box and MythTV is available from ATrpms. Then copy the working installation over to a NFS share, configure dhcpd on the server to support PXE, copy the kernel and possible initrd images to the tftpboot directory and that's about it. Please note that nfsroot support must be compiled into the client kernel and the NIC of the client must support PXE booting. That is something missing from cheap motherboards.

    13. Re:Wont work by jbarr · · Score: 2, Informative

      Though not technically a "hub" as such, ReplayTV 5xxx boxes allow full control using the DVArchive app on a networked PC. Shows can be streamed to a player on the PC for viewing, "offloaded" to the PC, and once on the PC, streamed back to the ReplayTV box for viewing or archived to DVD for later viewing in a DVD player. All without DRM.

      --
      My mom always said, "Jim, you're 1 in a million." Given the current population, there are 7000 of me. God help us all!
    14. Re:Wont work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can run a PVR-350's output as a framebuffer with X, and get everything displayed on your TV that way. I have mine set up like this on my 61" old school big screen, and it works beautifully.

      Check out Knoppmyth [www.mysettopbox.tv] for a relatively painless install (although the program guide while watching live TV is still borked).

    15. Re:Wont work by Lesson+No.+25 · · Score: 1
      I've tried MythTV, and found it to be terribly lowsy. . . . hearing the rave reviews about the Hauppauge PVR 250/350, I spent the money to get a PVR250, and found the quality to be no better than what I was getting, and the hardware encoder requires massive bitrates

      Is it possible (re the PVR 250) that you didn't have the software/drivers setup to utilize the hardware features of the card? And what were the specs on the box on which you were running it?

      I don't have any experience with MythTV, but I am making plans on putting together a box within the next few months (probably with a pchdtv card, and a hauppauge pvr-350, amd-64m, an nVidia video card). Any other relevant details of your experience that you can share?

  5. Microsoft's probably thrilled by Jason+Earl · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Microsoft is counting on Windows Media Center being the "next big thing" to give it the growth that it needs to justify its price/earnings ratio. A Linux-based contender in the same market developed by one of Microsoft's biggest allies is almost certainly going to be a major setback for Microsoft's plans.

    1. Re:Microsoft's probably thrilled by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      one of Microsoft's biggest allies

      While Carly has shown some inclination to support M$, I also think that calling HP and M$ "allies" may be making their relationship appear closer than it truly is.

      Yeah, I know, I know, please don't flame me. But HP does make linux-based boxes....

    2. Re:Microsoft's probably thrilled by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It may be just a ploy:
      Dell announces AMD based systems to get a better deal from Intel
      HP announces Linux based Media Center PC to get a better deal from Microsoft.

      Happens every so often...

    3. Re:Microsoft's probably thrilled by ch-chuck · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Microsoft is counting on Windows Media Center being the "next big thing"

      What's so big about a 'media center'? All it is is tv/stereo in a different package. Being able to watch moving pictures was once big, now it's not. Being able to listen to sound over long distances w/o paying the telco was once big, now it's not. Being able to watch TV was once big, not it's not. Being able to own your own computer was once big, now it's commonplace, as is being able to time shift media broadcasts. How is a 'media center' so revolutionary over what we already have other than the marketing and the needs of a company to find the 'next big thing'? To me it's like saying the new 2005 Ford is the biggest thing out since the 2004 Ford.

      --
      try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
    4. Re:Microsoft's probably thrilled by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it offers half of the features of this Linux based mediacenter application, then you will understand why it's the next BIG thing.

    5. Re:Microsoft's probably thrilled by Jason+Earl · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It's not that Media Centers are revolutionary that makes them interesting to Microsoft. It's the fact that there is the potential to sell millions more copies of Windows. Right now almost no one has a computer hooked up to their TV, and those few folks that do have computers hooked up to their TVs aren't generally using any Microsoft software. Instead they are using something like Tivo.

      Microsoft sees the Media Center as a potential market nearly as big as the DVD player market, and Microsoft's marketshare in this potentially huge new market is miniscule. Microsoft is desperate for growth opportunities that would justify its price/earnings ratio of over 30, and Windows Media Center is one of the few Microsoft products currently available that has the potential to build new revenue streams.

      Personally, I think that the Media Center idea is several years away from being ubiquitous, but then again I don't have cable television either. I know lots of folks that would give up their firstborn son before they gave up their Tivo. It is entirely possible that eventually the home entertainment computer could even be a bigger market than the normal personal computer that we all know and love.

      More importantly, the home entertainment computer is very likely to become a very strategic piece of the overall media puzzle. For example, Microsoft is betting that if it can score big with its Media Center that it could sell the ability to do workable DRM to Hollywood. Microsoft understands the power of controlling the platform, and it knows that they could make billions if they could put Microsoft in a position to become the DRM gateway for all of Hollywood.

      Not to mention the fact that Linux-based computers hooked up to the television could easily morph into game consoles. All the pieces are there already.

    6. Re:Microsoft's probably thrilled by MattJakel · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You can't really call HP Microsoft's biggest ally... Sure, the majority of their software comes standard with MS Software but they are one of the few companies to offer desktops and notebooks preloaded with Linux... And they also have HP-UX (even if I can't say many positive things about it), so it's not like they're completely devoted to Microsoft.

    7. Re:Microsoft's probably thrilled by cmacb · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Microsoft is desperate for growth opportunities that would justify its price/earnings ratio of over 30, and Windows Media Center is one of the few Microsoft products currently available that has the potential to build new revenue streams.

      I think the problem is that in their desperation to duplicate their success with Windows they are forced to make moves riskier than they would really like (Xbox) or safe/easy where the return on investment is zero to low (Slate). I think the media center falls into that latter category. People aren't going to pay a $300 premium just to know that the thing is running Windows. The imagined "ease of use" issue that are applied to Windows don't apply to a device with a remote control. Especially when there isn't a sugar daddy (like IBM) who has already established a market for the hardware and done all the hard design work (not to mention a host of software companies that have all but solved those problems as well).

      I'll buy a Linux based solution because I know I am less likely to be locked into a no-choice-but-to-upgrade future. Microsoft can only succeed at this if they convince almost everyone to go along and nominate them as the gatekeeper of everyone else's profitability. I can't see Hollywood or the RIAA going for that. On the other hand, worse things could happen than to see MS beat the crap out of the movie and music industry, they do, in some ways deserve it.

      Meanwhile, I expect Linux, which has no market share, share price, or bottom line to protect to continue to nip at the heals of these media bastards, all of them. In the end if it takes, HP, IBM, or mainland China to be the champion of freedom for certain types of intellectual property (IE that not owned by a mega corporation) then so be it.

      I'll be in line to buy one of these (although I haven't watched TV in 3 years and still listen to my own MP3s made from my own CDs and records made prior to 1990.)

    8. Re:Microsoft's probably thrilled by Jason+Earl · · Score: 1

      Very well said. Thanks.

    9. Re:Microsoft's probably thrilled by Stevyn · · Score: 1

      I agree with most of what you said, but I'm having trouble buying this whole "forced to upgrade" idea. I've seen this thrown around here a lot. How many people have been forced to upgrade a Microsoft product as a direct result of a Microsoft action? I guess upgrading from one version of Windows to another because the old one was buggy and unstable might be a reason, but that's not outright forcing anybody. And the reason that printer x or scanner y didn't work is the fault of the printer manufacturer.

      Even with Office formats, you're not completely stuck if your version of office can't open the latest version of the .doc format. You can always download openoffice or something else and convert them. I think this perception of Microsoft forcing people to upgrade is overblown. They continually convince people that their next version of some program is going to fix all the old bugs and not have any bugs of it's own. Well, that's the consumers' fault for believe that shit.

    10. Re:Microsoft's probably thrilled by unapersson · · Score: 1

      "Even with Office formats, you're not completely stuck if your version of office can't open the latest version of the .doc format. You can always download openoffice or something else and convert them."

      That's not because of Microsoft though, there's no "Save As... Open Office format" option in Word.

    11. Re:Microsoft's probably thrilled by Devi0s · · Score: 1

      Cringley, in this article, http://www.pbs.org/cringely/pulpit/pulpit20041216. html, speculates that Microsoft will someday release an XBox3 that combines the PC, Media Center, and Gaming Console, freeing Microsoft from their current reliance on PC manufacturers.

      --
      - Have you ever noticed that the more you learn about technology, the more stupid you sound trying to explain it?
    12. Re:Microsoft's probably thrilled by Jason+Earl · · Score: 1

      Microsoft has already shown with the XBox how pathetic they are when it comes to hardware manufacturing. Microsoft lost billions on the XBox despite the fact that they had some of the most popular games. Microsoft simply doesn't have the skills necessary to compete in a low margin market, especially when facing well-financed opponents like Sony or even Nintendo.

      Whatever happens, Microsoft isn't going to get into the PC business. If Microsoft did try to get into the PC business all of the folks that currently make a living bundling Windows with PC hardware would have little choice but to start actively promoting Linux desktops. Every system builder from Dell on down would have to rethink their alliance with Microsoft if Microsoft had a line of PCs of their own. If Dell started pushing low cost PCs running Linux Windows would be in for a real race. Heck, Dell could simply start promoting OpenOffice.org and do enough damage to Microsoft's bottom line that Microsoft would running yelling and screaming from the PC business.

      The fact of the matter is that Microsoft is almost entirely dependent on third party vendors like Dell, consulting firms, and small time hackers to sell its software. The more Microsoft tries to compete with these third party vendors the more likely these vendors are to use the already existing Free Software alternatives. If Dell, HP, the local computer guy down the street, and consulting firms (large and small) all started hawking Linux then Microsoft would see the bottom drop out of its market in a hurry.

      In the end commodity software is going to win out, and Microsoft's dominance of the PC business is going to come to a screeching halt. Don't get me wrong, Linux might never achieve total world domination, but if it doesn't it will only be because Microsoft started working a lot harder to keep its partners happy.

  6. Before you bash... by burbankmarc · · Score: 0

    Just remember....HP stands for "High Performance" /sarcasm off

    1. Re:Before you bash... by romanr · · Score: 1

      I always thought it stood for "High Price"

    2. Re:Before you bash... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OR
      Hardly
      Profitable

  7. Linux doesn't matter by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As was mentioned in the Linux-based portable media player thread, it makes no difference to the user whether these devices run Linux or not. You can't install any applications, you probably can't get a shell, and you can bet that HP will release the minimal amount of source that is legally required, so hacking will be frustrating.

    And it looks like this device might break a record for the number of different kinds of DRM in one system...

    1. Re:Linux doesn't matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but it runs linux!

    2. Re:Linux doesn't matter by Bloater · · Score: 1

      I wonder if it'll run any of MythTV

    3. Re:Linux doesn't matter by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      Well most people use PVR's to watch TV and record shows like a VCR on steriods. Not hack.

      Disabling DRM would be quite nice and so would something similiar to TIVO to go and perhaps a built in mp3 player would be cool.

      If I could install applications somehow it would be cool as I could turn it into a media hub to do anything.

      This is something MS wants to do badly and become the gatekeeper for any file stores whether its on the net, pc, or a tv show.

    4. Re:Linux doesn't matter by halfelven · · Score: 1

      If I could install applications somehow it would be cool as I could turn it into a media hub to do anything.

      Then what you probably want is MythTV running on a no-name beige PC running Linux.
      Ok, maybe not beige, since there are quite a few cute mini-ATX cases that actually look better than most VCRs.

    5. Re:Linux doesn't matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I imagine I'm not the only /. reader who likes hearing that they're not inadvertantly paying the M$ tax. Also, the larger the market-share of linux-based devices becomes, the greater chance that companies will participate in the open source process to ensure that drivers/codecs/apps are higher quality.

      So, it does matter somewhat.

    6. Re:Linux doesn't matter by jomas1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You are right that this media player may not be very hackable (although that remains to be seen) but you can't discount the effect of linux becoming commonplace in appliances. Linux as a desktop/server operating system may never mean anything to the average consumer.

      Linux as the operating system that powers their media devices, remote controls, cars, video game consoles etc, etc will mean a lot more. This may be one of the key ways that linux gains mainstream consumer acceptance.

    7. Re:Linux doesn't matter by mboverload · · Score: 1

      Why would a company NOT want their box to be hackable? Nerds will love it, tell thier non-nerd friends, and since the nerd is respected, it will be taken as truth. It is sad I know more about marketing than most companies seem to.

    8. Re:Linux doesn't matter by hawk · · Score: 1

      it makes no difference to the user whether these devices run Linux or not.

      Yeah.

      Years of crashing computers have prepared customers for televisions that crash in the midd

    9. Re:Linux doesn't matter by westlake · · Score: 1
      Linux as the operating system that powers their media devices, remote controls, cars, video game consoles etc, etc will mean a lot more. This may be one of the key ways that linux gains mainstream consumer acceptance.

      I'd take the odds that:

      Embedded Linux has zero visibility to consumers, and at retail Linux based devices are not significantly cheaper or feature-rich when compared to their Microsoft branded equivalents.

    10. Re:Linux doesn't matter by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      Well most people use PVR's to watch TV and record shows like a VCR on steriods. Not hack.

      Most Linux users use Linux to browse the internet and send email. Not hack.

      But that small minority that is able to, and does hack Linux is very important.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    11. Re:Linux doesn't matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm in no position to say "you're wrong" but how will they make it impossible to install aplications?

    12. Re:Linux doesn't matter by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 1

      Think about it from the opposite perspective: what if they simply don't write any code that allows non-media files to be transferred onto the device?

    13. Re:Linux doesn't matter by treebeard77 · · Score: 1

      I have to think that this sort of unit will ultimately mean more drivers written for Linux, which, IMHO, would be a very good thing.

    14. Re:Linux doesn't matter by boots@work · · Score: 1

      I wonder at what time that point was crossed: having more Linux non-developer users than developers? Certainly more than a few years, but when I started in about 95 probably more than half the people running Linux were programmers, if not actually developing the open source.

  8. The rest of the Article... by DuckofDeath87 · · Score: 1

    Ms. Fiorina will show it on friday.

    There, you know have the entire article.
    No need to bother bugmenot to RTFA =P.

  9. Pretty sparse article-Personhood. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Of course, this is the new, evil, HP, so I guess I shouldn't get my hopes up."

    People can be evil. Companies can't.

    " No indication whether it'll be DRM-crippled."

    Whatever the market wants. You want non-DRM players? You know how to ask?

  10. i can make one myself by halfelven · · Score: 2, Insightful

    and it's based on MythTV:

    http://www.mythtv.org/

    1. Re:i can make one myself by ewanrg · · Score: 1
      But can you do it for $200 - $300? That's one of the strongest arguments for a TiVO - that with rebate you can get one for about $100 that will work about as well with equally good (if not a little better) software than a MythTV system.

      Hopefully as equipment gets cheaper and video capture and playback becomes more common of a feature, there won't be such a cost difference in the future.

      Oh, and it should be pointed out the TiVO runs Linux as well... :-)

      ---

      I talk about this stuff here too. Go figure... ;-)

  11. Interesting by spac3manspiff · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Seems like people are slowly starting to turn to Linux distributions.
    http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1746236,00.as p

  12. Re:what's up with all this by Everach · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why do we need an article for every new gadget that will use Linux?


    The slashdot community is a large proponent of open source, of which Linux is a shining example. A new 'gadget' means another inroad. It means another corporate giant values our dollars and is willing to move away from closed source options to get our patronage.

    We don't care that another gadget uses Linux. We care that another corporation is willing to use an open source solution to get our dollars.

  13. Nope by pnevin · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Come on, everyone has to go through the pain and grief of configuring Mythbox to get to all that tasty Linux media goodness.

    (Damn it, I had to)

    1. Re:Nope by drgreg911 · · Score: 1

      Just out of curiosity...is anybody out there setting up MythTV boxes and selling them?

    2. Re:Nope by halfelven · · Score: 1

      Yes, apparently lots of people
      (read the first bullet)

  14. iPod compatibility...? by jargoone · · Score: 1, Troll

    Who really cares is this has an iPod dock or is compatible? What purpose would it serve? People already have a computer to sync to, and a device like this is presumably large enough to hold all the music you'd have on your portable, plus a whole lot more.

    Yep... just another blind, knee-jerk iPod reference.

    1. Re:iPod compatibility...? by slungsolow · · Score: 1

      technically you can't even put music on your iPod without syncing it to your computer.

      So.. yeah, what would be the point of an iPod doc?

    2. Re:iPod compatibility...? by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 3, Interesting

      What if you could rip directly from CD onto the media hub, and then sync from the media hub onto an iPod? No computer needed, which some people might see as a benefit.

    3. Re:iPod compatibility...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True, but I see it as yet another proof that Apple has made a marketing deal of some kind with Slashdot.

      There is WAY more hype here about Apple than they deserve; you'd think the so-called "moderation system" or the meta-mods would have corrected the imbalance by now... the fact that Slashdot continues to bring up Apple favorably in every damn thread seems to point to information tampering and extreme bias.

      Or are we the only two who have noticed? GASP! People everywhere are using the glorious iPod as a data storage device! Front Page News! (and when people use the iPod's competition to store their files it doesn't even rate a mention. Very interesting lack of objectivity there.)

    4. Re:iPod compatibility...? by MojoStan · · Score: 1
      What if you could rip directly from CD onto the media hub, and then sync from the media hub onto an iPod? No computer needed, which some people might see as a benefit.

      And why stop there? I think some people might like to store the songs they purchased from the iTunes Music Store on the media hub. However, HP would probably need to use an "illegal" hack to deal with Apple's DRM in Linux.

      The story's submitter wrote: Since HP also sells self-branded iPods, it would be great if they'd make such a box iPod friendly.

      Since HP also bundles and promotes the use of iTunes on their PCs, shouldn't he be asking Apple to make the iPod more Linux-friendly?

      --
      TO START
      PRESS ANY KEY

      Where's the 'ANY' key? I see Esk, Kitarl, and Pig-Up...

    5. Re:iPod compatibility...? by digiterata · · Score: 1

      I agree. If home theater PCs really are going to be the center of our digital life as HP and many others believe, then it makes perfect sense for them to integrate a digital music player which holds north of 90% of its market. They aren't the only ones who think this. The hobbyist HTPC market is full of cases with firewire and USB on the front panel for the same reason. The living room is a very social place and some people prefer to share and archive their pictures and music with family and friends.

    6. Re:iPod compatibility...? by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 1

      I think some people might like to store the songs they purchased from the iTunes Music Store on the media hub. However, HP would probably need to use an "illegal" hack to deal with Apple's DRM in Linux.

      Sounds like a good idea to me. But there's no need for hacks; HP has a partnership with Apple, so they can just license FairPlay.

      shouldn't he be asking Apple to make the iPod more Linux-friendly?

      What's wrong with it? Linux can mount an iPod already. The index file format is not publicly documented, but HP can just license it from Apple.

  15. Pretty sparse article-A Black and White World. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    "What makes HP evil now? I might be out of the loop..."

    Simple really.

    Good==do whatever slashdotters agree is good.

    Evil==slashdotters don't like whatever your doing.

    Now I better get a patent on it, while I can.

  16. New Rule by OECD · · Score: 2, Informative

    OK, everybody. Time for a new rule: You cannot name your product after the generic name for your product's function!

    Got that? No HP Media Hub, no IBM Personal Computer, no MS DOS!

    --
    One man's -1 Flamebait is another man's +5 Funny.
    1. Re:New Rule by The_Wilschon · · Score: 1

      What about generic names for product functions that come after the product name? like Xerox.

      --
      SIGSEGV caught, terminating

      wait... not that kind of sig.
    2. Re:New Rule by OECD · · Score: 1

      What about generic names for product functions that come after the product name? like Xerox.

      Nah. They don't even want their names to be generic. (Use xerox or kleenex casually in a publication and you'll get a polite letter from their lawyers. If it happens too much, they lose the trademark.)

      My beef is with companies who take seek to position themselves as the ur-version of a product through sleight of nomenclature. It's lazy, disingenuous, and sows confusion (the last being part of the intent, of course.)

      It's not even limited to hardware. There was a style of music popular twenty years ago called "Industrial Disco" (Industrial music you can dance to.) Some band came along and named themselves "Industrial Disco." Pathetic.

      --
      One man's -1 Flamebait is another man's +5 Funny.
    3. Re:New Rule by Kissing+Crimson · · Score: 2, Funny

      While we're already offtopic, how about the band Live? They made it a bit difficult to talk about "the Live concert I went to this weekend." (insert Abbot & Costello remark here)

      Note: I'm not bashing the band.

      --
      What's that smell? Ah, that's my karma burning...
    4. Re:New Rule by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love when they start suing people for using similar generic terms in their own products: Walmart makes the "Walmart 4H Pencil" which is the subject of a lawsuit from HP who makes the "HP 4H Pencil".

      That generic term "pencil" is worth a fortune.

    5. Re:New Rule by dcgaber · · Score: 1

      Note: I'm not bashing the band.

      You should!

    6. Re:New Rule by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MS (shoft for Micro Soft) DOS (short for QDOS, Quick'n'Dirty Operating System) would be named after the generic name for what?

      Oh, you mean OS, just like MacOS?

    7. Re:New Rule by cshark · · Score: 1

      Speaking of Abbot and Costello references: I've been meaning to change my name for awhile now, being as my parents gave me an esoteric hard to pronounce gutteral sounding name that ended up getting mis-spelled on my birth certificate. So I'm going to change my name to Who. I think it would be funny. "What's your name?" "Who." "You, what's your name?" Heh heh. And I'll be on first. You can mod me down now.

      --

      This signature has Super Cow Powers

  17. DRM by halfelven · · Score: 2, Informative

    Oh, and if you're worried about DRM in the context of HDTV, have a look at pcHDTV:

    http://www.pchdtv.com/

    It totally ignores the broadcast flag. ;-) Works with MythTV. Enough said.
    BTW, it will be illegal to sell it in the US after June 2005 (or something like that), so plan accordingly. ;-)
    It will always be legal to use it, if purchased before the deadline, because all such devices will be grandfathered into the new regulations automatically.

    1. Re:DRM by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      This buying after a date thing.
      Can I buy a job lot of them, and give them to friends as presents?
      Or will that still be illegal?
      Can I also setup a shop, and sell remote control batteries, and with every (very expensive) pack, get a free decoder?

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    2. Re:DRM by Blue-Footed+Boobie · · Score: 1
      Jesus, that's what - 3 seperate posts from you whoring out the pcHDTV card.

      Gee, you don't work for them, do you??

      --
      DAMN YOU OCTODOG! DAMN YOU TO HELL!
    3. Re:DRM by halfelven · · Score: 0, Redundant

      And yet most of them were moded Informative.

      No, i don't work for them.

    4. Re:DRM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heaven forbid that someone pastes relevant information on Slashdot.

    5. Re:DRM by evilviper · · Score: 1
      It will always be legal to use it, if purchased before the deadline

      I've considered buying one before the deadline, but I've spent way too much on high-tech toys that have turned out useless to purchase this without much thought.

      You see, I'm sure I'm like a lot of people, in that I'm out-of-range of HD broadcasts. I suppose somebody might setup an HDTV re-transmitter around here, but even that will give me less than a handful of HDTV channels.

      With Satellite and Digital Cable, the HDTV broadcasts are tuned-in by the boxes you get from them, and an HDTV tuner is useless.

      So, with that said, why should I buy an hdtv tuner of any kind right now? Why should anybody, when both cable and satellite will provide your local channels in HD over their networks, and not require you to buy a $200+ tuner?

      This is not to mention that PCI is an outdated interface, and will surely start disappearing from PCs within the next few years. And there's plenty that might go wrong with this card in that time.

      Personally, I think there will be more (mostly legal) ways around the broadcast flag than there are to defeat macrovision... whatever interface you get your HDTV programming through.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  18. Hope its not restricted by t_allardyce · · Score: 3, Insightful

    All I can say is they better not bother trying any DRM bullshit, if it can't share all media, skip adverts etc etc its a useless pile of crap (actually i think shit even has more uses than a PVR/media center with DRM)

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  19. How long by ifwm · · Score: 3, Insightful

    before the fact that something runs a version of Linux is no longer newsworthy. I like this product, and it's worthy of being posted. But I also think there's something a little sad about making a fuss over that fact. That mentality seems a little backward anymore.

    1. Re:How long by olyar · · Score: 1

      We should stop making a big fuss over it when our favorite basketball team wins a big game too. It's just so sad to make such a big fuss over it and put it in the newspaper and stuff.

      --
      Custom, hands-free Linux installs. Instalinux
  20. BugMeNot by chrisvdb · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Strange, tried at least 10 bug me not accounts for the nytimes website, and none worked?

    Could it be that they (finally) started disabling these accounts? Bummer...

  21. HP15C by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I dont care if HP makes doggie bisquits. I just want my HP15C

    1. Re:HP15C by VAXcat · · Score: 2, Funny

      If ya were a real computer person, you'd want the HP16C. I bought one 22 years ago, and liked it so much, I bought 3 more so I would alway have one...22 years later, the first one is still going strong...

      --
      There is no God, and Dirac is his prophet.
    2. Re:HP15C by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I only had the lowly HP11C which I got as a graduation present from my brother back in 1986.
      I was just using it yesterday to do something trig-ish.
      It occured to me that I haven't EVER changed the batteries in that thing. What is the half life of those things, anyway?

  22. hah! my Sony Grand Wega runs Linux, too! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    - but i sure as hell can't get into the box!

    - Sony must have cleaned up on the Wegas in the last quarter: LCD projection TV w/built-in HDTV tuner, etc. for $2 (the bulb is replaceable)...

    - Linux apparently hosts the TV's menu system, built-in slide show app (w/a built-in sound track), and memory stick support...

    - the TV also plays .mp3 sound tracks from the memory stick!

    1. Re:hah! my Sony Grand Wega runs Linux, too! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FWIW, and maybe everyone already knows this, but my TiVo boxes are both Linux-based. If you check out the TiVo site, you find the home-media-option (I don't have it) to allow recording on one system, but playback through another. Add to this the Apple dongle that lets you network your iTunes library anywhere....

      So home media services can provide a lot that you might not otherwise consider for entertainment convenience.

      And so what if we can't hack the system.

      If it's based on Linux, Bill Gates gets none of the money. HP might be an evil to most, but it's not the FUD of MS, imho.

      Earl-too-lazy-to-not-be-anonymous-coward

  23. Please stop putting registration required links by Col_Panic · · Score: 0, Troll

    Just a lovely off topic rant to request that you guys STOP putting links to "must be registered to view this page" pages in articles. Having to register to see a page is annoying, goes against the spirit of the net and Slashdot shouldn't support sites that think they can throw their weight around to force people into their marketing programs just to look at a page.

    1. Re:Please stop putting registration required links by DigitalHammer · · Score: 1

      Visit www.bugmenot.com or install the firefox extension.

    2. Re:Please stop putting registration required links by AceCaseOR · · Score: 1

      Bugmenot's passwords aren't working at the New York Times anymore.

      --
      Zagreus sits inside your head, Zagreus lives among the dead, Zagreus sees you in your bed and eats you in your sleep.
    3. Re:Please stop putting registration required links by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      bugmenot still works for NYtimes.

    4. Re:Please stop putting registration required links by Pinky3 · · Score: 1
      It has been explained several times that the New York Times is an exception to the Slashdot policy of not using links to sites that require registration.

      You have every right not to read the article, not to buy the New York Times, and not to read Slashdot. However, the powers that be have decided that the amount of information in the New York Times that is "news for nerds" is sufficient to warrant the exception to the general rule.

    5. Re:Please stop putting registration required links by martinX · · Score: 1

      I clicked on the link. It took me to the NYT story. I am not a subscriber. I didn't use bugmenot. It all just worked.

      --
      When they came for the communists, I said "He's next door. Take him away. Goddam commies."
  24. Really? by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 2, Informative

    Since HP also sells self-branded iPods, it would be great if they'd make such a box iPod friendly.

    I thought they sold Apple branded iPods. It's through HP's channel. I guess it is listed on PCConnection as the "HP iPod", but it's still got a big apple sandblasted onto the back. They never made that HP-blue iPod all the rumor sites were blathering about.

    --

    There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    1. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have an HP iPod (got it from that freeipods site), it's the same as an apple ipod but in addition to the apple logo on the back, it has an HP logo.
      Also it says iPod+HP on the box, and the disk is formatted FAT32 out of the box, whereas the Apple is formatted to whatever mac uses (so pc users who get an hp ipod don't have to format it when they first connect it)

      Also HP offers support for the hp ipod, they are more knowledgable about windows so they can help more if you're a windows user.. So basically if don't use windows, theres no real reason to get an hp ipod, they are the same price too.. I just got my hp because it allowed me to get it faster than the people who waited for Apple since hp had more in stock

    2. Re:Really? by javaxman · · Score: 2, Informative
      The HP logo is there... under the word "iPod", which is under the ( larger ) Apple logo on the back. So, they are in a sense both Apple and HP branded, oddly enough.

      Perhaps they did some research into the marketability of an "HP blue" iPod and decided to call that off... after all, you can always buy the iPod Tattoo kit and print up your own blue umm... those are stickers, right? Yea, that's what I want to do, cover my iPod with stickers...

    3. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they're not stickers, they're those clingy plastic things that stick with friction, they peel off easy and can be reused (like those ones you put on windows, and sometimes have to wet/lick to get them to stick if the window or "sticker" is dirty)

  25. HP in the living room by UWC · · Score: 3, Informative

    They're apparently introducing TVs and projectors, too. According to a mini-article on Wired, 17 TVs and "TV projectors" in addition to the mentioned media hub. They're just coming a bit late to the wired living room scene, but apparently with a not insubstantial product line. If they integrate the product features well, the line might end up successful. Having an all-in-one HP remote would be a nice incentive, though I guess the one-remote-for-every-device (if you don't want to sacrifice functionality) situation is fairly well accepted at this point.

    1. Re:HP in the living room by Master+Bait · · Score: 1

      I think that's a smart idea. A computer company such as Apple would do themselves well to partner with a company such as Bang + Olufsen to market TVs and Stereos.

      --
      "Only in their dreams can men truly be free 'twas always thus, and always thus will be."
      --Tom Schulman
  26. DRM is not such a bad issue if you consider this by halfelven · · Score: 3, Informative

    It is still legal to sell broadcast-flag-noncompliant devices in the US until June 2005. One such device is pcHDTV which works fine with MythTV
    Even after June, it will still be legal to use such devices, if they were purchased before the deadline.

    Can you put two and two together now? ;-)

  27. So Says Cosmo by ClosedSource · · Score: 2, Funny

    For some reason I hear Cosmo from "Fairly Odd Parents" saying "Yeah, but it runs linux!". That's what happens when you watch TV with a 4 year old.

    1. Re:So Says Cosmo by JWW · · Score: 1

      I don't know. "Fairly Odd Parents" seems to reference (kiss up) to Bill Gates too much for my tastes.

      Now, on "Jimmy Neutron", defenstration is actually one of the perennial spelling words listed on the blackboard. Subtle, but interesting to think about.

    2. Re:So Says Cosmo by ClosedSource · · Score: 1

      I guess I haven't been watching FOP with as much concentration as you do - I missed the Bill Gates references.

    3. Re:So Says Cosmo by JWW · · Score: 1

      The most insidious reference is when they actually meet him in the 70's (they don't get his age right exactly - too young) during the time travel episode where Timmy tries to stop Dad from winning a trophy.

      Hey the kids, ummm, they force me to watch, yeah, thats it!

  28. Matters to HP by spud603 · · Score: 4, Interesting
    You're probably right that from the user's point of view, this won't make a lick of difference. The only thing I can think of is that folks may manage to hack the system and start using VLC for playback, or something...

    But from HP's angle, I can't believe they're only doing this now. If Linux is good for anything, it's for optimized, customized systems. With Linux, HP can build in exactly the functionality they need -- nothing more. Plus it's free.

  29. awesome by halfelven · · Score: 1

    It's amazing. I didn't watch any TV show in the last year. Since i installed MythTV i caught up on Star Trek. :-)
    Now i understand those raving lunatics called TiVo nazis. ;-)

  30. Right by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 1

    Yes, device makers benefit from using Linux, that's why they do it. But there's no point in advertising it.

    HP sold a Linux-based Digital Entertainment Center about 5 years ago, but it was too expensive for basically an audio jukebox.

  31. Well by CaptainZapp · · Score: 0, Redundant
    Hewlett-Packard To Offer Linux-based Media Hub

    How nice for them...

    --
    ich bin der musikant

    mit taschenrechner in der hand

    kraftwerk

  32. who cares? by halfelven · · Score: 1

    You can run MythTV on any PC box, and it already supports all the hardware you need.

    1. Re:who cares? by Bloater · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, but any PC box doesn't look like a set top, nor does it come with software support or the HP brand confidence.

    2. Re:who cares? by halfelven · · Score: 1

      "brand confidence"

      haha, i wish i had moderator points (+1 Funny)

  33. Yes but what happens in 7995 years? by texasfight · · Score: 3, Funny

    Given today's earlier post http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/01/05/021 6220&tid=126&tid=218, is it Y10K ready, or do I lose almost 8000 years of my music downloads when New Year's comes around?

    1. Re:Yes but what happens in 7995 years? by sharkey · · Score: 1

      Just make sure it's turned off, so it doesn't get wiped when they clean the Internet on New Year's Eve, and you'll be fine.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  34. HP swings....and misses again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    From the article, HP says that price is unimportant.

    Looks like they are missing the point again.

    Price is the main factor preventing media center type boxes from being widely adopted.

    Price is why DVD recorders didn't sell well in Christmas 2004 (see below). Same goes for media center boxes.

    http://www.digitimes.com/news/a20040924A1001.htm l

    Wal-Mart shifts OEM orders for movie DVD discs from China to Taiwan

    Jimmy Hsu, Taipei; Adam Hwang, DigiTimes.com [Friday 24 September 2004]

    In response to concerns from Philips over royalty payments for its DVD patents, US retail giant Wal-Mart has shifted its OEM orders for movie DVD discs from existing partners in China to a few second-tier manufacturers of pre-recorded optical discs in Taiwan, according to the Taiwan makers.

    Wal-Mart sells VCD and DVD discs at its retail outlets and also has some copyrights for movies produced by some independent companies. Since Wal-Mart emphasizes price, its VCD and DVD discs are mostly produced in China, the makers indicated.

    However, China-based OEM makers for Wal-Mart are not willing to pay royalty fees to Philips, which is the patent owner, the makers pointed out. The China government wants to negotiate royalty payment with Philips on behalf of China-based makers rather than let Philips talk directly with individual makers. Since the makers were being protected by the government, Philips instead exerted pressure on Wal-Mart to protect its patent rights, the makers noted.

    Consequently, Wal-Mart began seeking Philips licensees in Taiwan in June of this year. A few second-tier makers were selected, including Homenema Disk, Feng Sheng Technology, Pandisk Technology and Delphi Technology. Wal-Mart orders as much as 15 million discs per month, and none of the selected OEM makers has the production capacity to match the orders themselves, the makers added.

    U-Tech Media, Taiwan's largest producer of pre-recorded optical discs, did not participate in the bid for Wal-Mart's OEM orders since the company's production capacity is already booked by its main clients, Time Warner and eight large movie studios in the US.

    Despite the large volume, the average gross margin for Wal-Mart OEM orders is very low, according to the Taiwan makers. Feng Sheng has begun shipments to Wal-Mart in small volumes but does not plan to expand capacity due to the uncertainty about continued orders from Wal-Mart, the company indicated. Homenema is considering what volumes it wants to produce for Wal-Mart and will begin delivery soon, the company said.

  35. Re:what's up with all this by Marthisdil · · Score: 0

    We don't care that another gadget uses Linux. We care that another corporation is willing to use an open source solution to get our dollars.

    Plus, it lets the open-sourcies not have to whine about it being MS or something...heh.

  36. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No; it will work.

  37. Please stop [Complaining about 'free' software] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    " Just a lovely off topic rant to request that you guys STOP putting links to "must be registered to view this page" pages in articles."

    Out of sight. Out of mind.

    "Having to register to see a page is annoying, goes against the spirit of the net"

    "Spirit of the Net"*=="I don't want to live in society anymore, but I'll never turn down the free food".

    "and Slashdot shouldn't support sites that think they can throw their weight around to force people into their marketing programs just to look at a page."

    And we don't like how you "throw your weight around" forcing us to read your rants.

    *The "Net" isn't a person. It has no spirit.

    1. Re:Please stop [Complaining about 'free' software] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When you have an actual point (I couldn't find it), please wake me up.

  38. Re:HP = BAD? by orthogonal · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hewlett-Packard To Offer Linux-based Media Hub

    Don't we hate HP? I thought that we did...


    But not if that Media Hub is designed around Carly Fiorina's head on a stick!

    You just tweak her nose to adjust the volume.

  39. how about a media center without DRM? by halfelven · · Score: 1

    The HP thing will certainly be DRM-ized.
    But a MythTV box with a pcHDTV card pays no attention to DRM. ;-)

  40. Try this bugmenot account - it worked for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    acct: goaway52
    paswd: GoAway52

  41. B-B-But they hire lots of MBAs these days! by jerryasher · · Score: 4, Funny

    You're way wrong, no way that HP can have taken so many disastrous steps.

    They are way improved over just five years ago. What used to be a company dominated by silly, market-ignorant, idealistic engineers and the HP way has now become the market driven, best practices, outsourcing MBA laden HP we know and the markets love

    1. Re:B-B-But they hire lots of MBAs these days! by Icco · · Score: 1

      wanna bet. i know of hundreds of people who lost there jobs due to some stupid decisions made by hp. They used to be awsome but have been going down hill ever since the agilent/hp split

      --
      -- There is a fine line betwen genius and insanity, i have erased that line.
    2. Re:B-B-But they hire lots of MBAs these days! by Sri+Lumpa · · Score: 1


      You need to replace your sarcasm detector.

      --
      "The obvious mathematical breakthrough would be development of an easy way to factor large prime numbers." Bill Gates,
  42. The New HP Linux Media Center Logo by Thomas+Hawk · · Score: 1

    I've designed a new logo for the combo Linux / HP Media Center PC. http://thomashawk.com/2005/01/hp-launching-linux-m edia-center-pc-to.html/

    1. Re:The New HP Linux Media Center Logo by Thomas+Hawk · · Score: 2, Interesting
  43. It runs on Linux by AstroDrabb · · Score: 1
    but will Linux be supported? Or will this be an MS-Only device?

    Personally, I can't stand devices that are based on Linux yet don't support a Linux desktop client.

    --
    If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
    it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
    1. Re:It runs on Linux by p0rnking · · Score: 1

      I'm almost ready to bet that there are more devices (watches, internet ready fridges, alarm systems, surveillance systems, cameras, media devices, Infinium' Phantom, TV remotes, cell phones, PDA/Handheld computers, VoIP Phones, Robots, Routers ...) out there that run linux, than there are home PCs and servers, therefor, Linux Desktop clients are only on a minority of all things that run linux.

    2. Re:It runs on Linux by AstroDrabb · · Score: 1

      Well, I personally wouldn't take that bet since I think your correct. However, there are still too many devices that run Linux that do not support Linux as a client. I just think that is wrong IMO.

      --
      If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
      it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
  44. Re:New for Nerds not Linux Advocacy only by xtermin8 · · Score: 1

    Yeah, this doesn't matter for "users," but this is "News for Nerds," not news for linux advocates only(although it may seem that way at times) or news for wealthy, uncurious gadgeteers. Some of us here are in the business, and some of us hack harware for a hobby, and not just consumers. If I want to spend the time and effort, I bet I could install applications, or at least get to a command line shell.

  45. Re:Who cares... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Those are some great films. Watch your smart mouth punk!

  46. Re:DRM is not such a bad issue if you consider thi by Narcissus · · Score: 1

    Just out of curiosity (extreme curiosity, seeing as I don't even live in the US): would it be illegal to sell second hand non-compliant devices after that date, or only new ones?

    If it's only new ones, I think someone should buy a lot of those devices just before that date, just to resell later on...

  47. I know!! by sp0rk173 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I was wondering the same thing. I think there should be more negative modding options, like "You're Moron" or "Fucktarded" or "STFU!" Some options that express real comtempt for the poster. Then, maybe if we hurt the cyber-egos of the morons on slashdot, it won't be quite as lame.

  48. Re:DRM is not such a bad issue if you consider thi by dcgaber · · Score: 2, Informative

    I can put two and two together, but the pcHDTV does nothing to decrypt satellite or cable HD content. All this will get you is broadcast OTA HD signals. That is great if you like local sports and reality tv. Me, I don't like reality tv, and most sports I do watch are on cable as it is. Nevertheless, I will probably be getting one of these cards to throw in my myth box right around May, I mean if another tit gets shown on the superbowl, i want to capture that in its hi-def gloriness.

  49. Bogus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have found plenty of stories in other newspapers for this particular news item that do not require information.

  50. HP stealing Apple's thunder? by Orbital+Observer · · Score: 1

    I wonder if Steve Jobs is going to make an announcement on the 11th that will either mirror or compliment this HP announcement?

    --
    ---- I have nothing more to add.
  51. The China fallacy by westlake · · Score: 1
    In the end if it takes, HP, IBM, or mainland China to be the champion of freedom for certain types of intellectual property (IE that not owned by a mega corporation) then so be it.

    Microsoft was the first foreign company to gain admission to the China Software Industry Association. Microsoft Joins in China Software Industry Association (2002)

    China's Intellectual Property Law has been brought into synch with the WTO and it's major trading partners. The Ministry of Science and Technology: Laws and Regulations

    Chinese films with a significant North American market are released as Region 1 DVDs. Films of China The Chinese government is not adverse to box-office success, commercial production, foreign investment and distribution. Chinese Film Industry To Be Established (2003)

    1. Re:The China fallacy by cmacb · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the links (all interesting).

      But I'm pretty sure Linux was well on its way in China before 2002. They have their own distro in fact.

      As for films and music, I didn't mean to imply that China would lead the way in piracy. But as their market grows (ditto India, Brazil, others) the Hollywood, RIAA gang shrinks in importance. At some point, the folly of fighting piracy, combined with a shrinking world market share, might actually shake some sense into them.

      The costs of producing music, and movies here in America are, to be blunt, fscked up. I see a future where Hollywood and the RIAA will be DELIGHTED to have fans download their content, because the likelihood of people around the world paying $10 a pop to see it in theaters or buy it on a CD is next to nill.

      As I mentioned, I don't currently watch TV. That has nothing to do with Open source. it has to do with most of it being CRAP!

      I see a future in which Internet downloads take the place of live performances/movie theaters now in driving CD and DVD sales or eventually replacing those sales with pay-per-download. Our entertainment industries are too self absorbed to think about that as a possibility. But they'll change. Or die.

    2. Re:The China fallacy by Stepping+Razor · · Score: 1

      I see a future in which Internet downloads take the place of live performances/movie theaters now in driving CD and DVD sales or eventually replacing those sales with pay-per-download. Our entertainment industries are too self absorbed to think about that as a possibility.

      i agree with some of your points. i believe that the internet will replace a lot of recorded media as a source of entertainment, but i think live performances will remain popular. perhaps in future bands will come to rely more on their live performances for revenue.

  52. interesting by Exter-C · · Score: 1

    This is an interesting development but is HP just using Linux to put further pressure on Microsoft as they have previously done?

  53. Re:HP = BAD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ass nugget

  54. HP calculators by nwerneck · · Score: 1

    HP calculators are still admired here in Brazil at least. I believe their market in europe is also bigger then in the USA, where it seems to me TI always had more market than HP. Of course, their new HP49 sucks, I would never buy one!!! It seems like they just rushed to create a new calculator with an iMac like design. And now their empire will ruin because palmtops are getting so cheap you can run Octave to make calculations. This will be nice... That is, if the teachers allow you to make a test with a computer!

    --
    Nicolau Werneck - NIC1138
    "The secret of genius is to carry the spirit of childhood into maturity" -- Thomas Huxley
  55. HP made the best calculators ever produced by Gnavpot · · Score: 2, Informative

    I have seen very few HP calculators in my life, most of the calculators were in fact Texas Instruments.

    When I was young, Texas Instruments made cheap, inferior scientific calculators. The keys vere shitty - you pressed and nothing happened, you pressed a little more and suddenly the display was filled with 8 occurences of the same digit.

    At the same time, HP made expensive calculators which could be thrown against a wall without taking any damage, which had very precise and everlasting keys, and which had OPN (a reverse, but very intuitive way of entering a calculation).

    During most of my education (I am a mechanical engineer), HP calculators were the norm. We could buy Texas if we wanted, but we would then be on our own without any help during lessons.

    Today I still use a HP calculator though it is not the same quality as my old mid-eighties HP-15C which was stolen. My wife still has and uses her HP-15C as do several of my colleagues. I have never ever seen or heard of a broken HP calculator from that time.

  56. no satellite no good by elweasel · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately the Satellite providers have barely conquered HD if at all, we may never see a "media hub" for satellite TV Fans.

    here's a company that's got some interesting product stack9.com/main.php it'll set the music, mood lighting, and babysit your kids. ...but still no satellite.