Slashdot Mirror


Classic Math Puzzle Cracked

An anonymous reader writes "This is cool - if mind-bending. A century ago, a self-taught math genius from India noticed some patterns in how numbers can be created by adding other numbers. Now a grad student has finished the job showing that the patterns apply to all prime numbers, not just some. There's more on the Indian math guy here."

555 comments

  1. Srinivasa Ramanujan? by crypto55 · · Score: 5, Informative

    you mean Srinivasa Ramanujan

    --
    Due to financial difficulties, the light at the end of the tunnel has been turned off.
    1. Re:Srinivasa Ramanujan? by MarkusQ · · Score: 5, Insightful

      My thoughts exactly. I wonder, will the next article about relativity reference "some German physics guy"? Or, for that matter, should we be on the lookout for articles about an operating system software codes invented by a Finlandish computer guy?

      --MarkusQ

    2. Re:Srinivasa Ramanujan? by Krakhan · · Score: 1

      No kidding, since it seems like the submitter didn't bother himself to RTFA.

    3. Re:Srinivasa Ramanujan? by caderoux · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The original post is horrible, it makes it out that he was some kind of idiot savant - he worked with Hardy at Trinity, and, if he hadn't died so young, could have gone on to who knows what else.

    4. Re:Srinivasa Ramanujan? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      From the linked article:
      Ramanujan had always lived in a tropical climate and had his mother (later his wife) to cook for him

      (emphasis added)

    5. Re:Srinivasa Ramanujan? by nhavar · · Score: 1

      No, it's "some guy from finland or something".

      --
      "Do not be swept up in the momentum of mediocrity." - anon
    6. Re:Srinivasa Ramanujan? by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      No, I think it was meant to be sarcastic, a comment on our ethnocentrism or something.

      However, it is also proof that outsourcing is nothing new.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    7. Re:Srinivasa Ramanujan? by melkorainur · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Prejudice is an ugly thing. But I'm not sure you can assert that the nature in which Ramanujan was referred to as "Indian math guy" in the parent post, was an artifact of prejudice, ignorance, disrespect or a combination of these things and more. In any case, the reason doesn't matter. What matters is that this article quality on /. is substandard and causing me to look for alternatives to /.

      Maybe it's time that we pulled in Indian editors to /., perhaps they could help push quality up a notch.

    8. Re:Srinivasa Ramanujan? by Zoinks · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'm surprised we got as much detail! Should be something like "Some smart guy from a long time ago did some smart things, and now some other smart guy made them better..." Duuuuuh, that's what *I* got my degree for!

    9. Re:Srinivasa Ramanujan? by d34thm0nk3y · · Score: 2, Insightful

      My thoughts exactly. I wonder, will the next article about relativity reference "some German physics guy"? Or, for that matter, should we be on the lookout for articles about an operating system software codes invented by a Finlandish computer guy?

      I think it was a reference to the Bill Nye story posted earlier. Poor taste, maybe, but will everybody stop being offended all PC like?

    10. Re:Srinivasa Ramanujan? by RedWizzard · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think it was a reference to the Bill Nye story posted earlier. I doubt it. Submissions usually sit in the queue for a day or two before being accepted (or rejected). Besides, since the submittors have no control over when their stories are posted, it'd be pretty stupid to try to reference an earlier story without an explicit link, wouldn't it?

    11. Re:Srinivasa Ramanujan? by ChuckSchwab · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What pisses me off is how all of my well-written summaries get rejected, yet somehow "the Indian math guy" gets through.

    12. Re:Srinivasa Ramanujan? by SeventyBang · · Score: 0

      But as claimed last week, "math is overemphasized" in the tech industry.
      choke. cough. gasp.

      Srinivasa Ramanujan was more than "...the Indian math guy..." mentioned in the precis.

      Could someone quit approving stories submitted by uninformed junior high school students?

    13. Re:Srinivasa Ramanujan? by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      *are* there any alternatives to /.? K5 went downhill and is now not worth looking it... anything else is just going to have all the slashdot groupthink and resident trolls all over again, so even if the articles were better the site may not improve.

    14. Re:Srinivasa Ramanujan? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> you mean Srinivasa Ramanujan

      Gesundheit!

    15. Re:Srinivasa Ramanujan? by lazytiger · · Score: 3, Informative
      ...software codes invented by a Finlandish computer guy?

      You mean Finnish?

      Or, well, you know... this is Slashdot. I guess Finlandish is close enough.
    16. Re:Srinivasa Ramanujan? by QMO · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It appears to me that Ramanujan's name was left out purposely to help understanding and spark interest.

      Most /. readers who care who'd care would know exactly who was meant. And for those who didn't know about Ramanujan, "a self-taught math genius from India" was more informative and more memorable than just the name.

      Also, the fact that the link to the bio was included seems to indicate that "anonymous reader" does know and care who "the Indian math guy" was.

      I apologize in advance for the following rant:
      The sad thing is that much of readership of /. is a little low on reading comprehension skills and misses things like this.

      --
      Exam 4/C again. Maybe I'll do better this time.
    17. Re:Srinivasa Ramanujan? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Maybe, but after looking at the link about SR's origins, the "Indian Math Guy" does seem sort of appropos. He certainly was that until Hardy essentially recognized the guy's talents.

      If there was a world-class Cricket or Squash player, he/she'd probably be known as "that American Cricket Batter", etc.

      Part of that is perception of reality. In this case, at the time, India was a British Colony. As such, expectations of Indians by British society were...low.

      Just like the expectation of an American being a world-class cricket player (who is not an expatriate from a traditional 'cricket' country).

      Just look at the angst in the US about long distance running. The US hasn't had a world-class marathoner or 10K runner since the mid-80's.

    18. Re:Srinivasa Ramanujan? by Hrodvitnir · · Score: 3, Funny

      I heard Iceland just granted citizenship to some American chess player or something. He's also suing the U.S. for some reason.

      --
      "There are more important things than stopping terrorism. Upholding the Constitution is one of them." - Ars Forumer.
    19. Re:Srinivasa Ramanujan? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Long live Finlandia!

    20. Re:Srinivasa Ramanujan? by carpe_noctem · · Score: 4, Funny

      If they can catch the dupes, mispellings, and other obvious errors, I'm all for outsourcing slashdot.

      --
      "Quoting famous computer scientists out of context is the root of all evil (or at least most of it) in programming." - K
    21. Re:Srinivasa Ramanujan? by 1u3hr · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And yesterday we had "a major Australian newspaper" omitting to mention it was the "Melbourne Age". It seems that foreigners aren't worthy of having names, so it's just a waste of space to use them. But "they" really rubbed it in with this one, mentioning Ramanujan's nationality twice and still avoiding the name -- though perhaps it would have been more insulting if they'd tried to use it, considering the quality of spelling here.

    22. Re:Srinivasa Ramanujan? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      an American being a world-class cricket player

      BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAhahahahahahahaha!!!! ...wheeeeeeze...

      BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAhahahahahahahaha!!!

      stop it - you're killing me...

      I'd really *really* like to see that, as it would complete my view that reality is just one great big acid trip.

      I get your point, but thats fucking hilarious.

    23. Re:Srinivasa Ramanujan? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Call the Grecians!!!

    24. Re:Srinivasa Ramanujan? by GoofyBoy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      >It appears to me that Ramanujan's name was left out purposely to help understanding and spark interest.

      Thats like saying when someone types in all capitals its purposefully to help understanding and spark interest.

      You don't say "That MIT guy" or "That English guy in the wheelchair" just to help understanding. It verges on the disrepectful.

      If you want to spark interest do it on his work/his merit. Not on his nationality.

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    25. Re:Srinivasa Ramanujan? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you might not know it, but "some ... guy" will join the ranks of "In Russia..." and "Imagine a Beowulf cluster of..." congratulations!

    26. Re:Srinivasa Ramanujan? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > What matters is that this article quality on /. is substandard and causing me to look for alternatives to /.

      http://technocrat.net/

      And as a supplement for OSS/UNIX/Linux stuff in particular, I like:

      http://rootprompt.org/
      http://www.librenix.com/

    27. Re:Srinivasa Ramanujan? by cerebis · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Perhaps there is some obscure humourous or ironic context for the "some guy" approach but nearly everyone will interpret it as dumbing down the information. To me, that is the antithesis of what a geek audience would want.

      To demonstrate the ability to have nearly the exact same summary, without the dumbing down I present you an alternative, the extra two words bolded for emphasis.

      "This is cool - if mind-bending. A century ago, a self-taught math genius from India, named Ramanujan, noticed some patterns in how numbers can be created by adding other numbers. Now a grad student has finished the job showing that the patterns apply to all prime numbers, not just some. There's more on the Indian math guy here."
    28. Re:Srinivasa Ramanujan? by cerebis · · Score: 1

      On second thought, the summary is irretrievably goofy sounding. Hehe.

    29. Re:Srinivasa Ramanujan? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And an Indian being a world-class football (soccer) player. Ha Ha Ha .....

    30. Re:Srinivasa Ramanujan? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With all the programmers getting layed off and their jobs sent to India, perhaps Slashdot itself will.

      All the nerds with jobs will be there, those in the US will be burger flippers (*) or on the street, and Slashdot's future audience will be over in India.

      (*) Don't tell me that people in the food industry need people skills, etc. I am NOT denying that there are smart people with skills in that industry, but the MINIMUM qualifications are nearly nil.

      I have NEVER had an order gotten taken correctly on the first try in months!

    31. Re:Srinivasa Ramanujan? by ikes · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      The US hasn't had a world-class marathoner or 10K runner since the mid-80's.

      uh... Meb Keflezighi? Deena Kastor?

    32. Re:Srinivasa Ramanujan? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, that's almost exactly what CNN Headline News had to say about it. Spooky.

    33. Re:Srinivasa Ramanujan? by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1

      Finlandish computer guy

      It's actually "Finnish" not "Finlandish".

    34. Re:Srinivasa Ramanujan? by ghoti · · Score: 2, Informative

      You must be kidding. K5's articles are a totally different league: they're original, thoughtful, and interesting. Plus, the articles are not only moderated by the readers, there's also an editing queue. Sure, they don't post a story for every minor kernel update or gnome release. But Kuro5hin is what I actually read, as opposed to casually browsing /.

      --
      EagerEyes.org: Visualization and Visual Communication
    35. Re:Srinivasa Ramanujan? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What part of "World Class" don't you understand?

    36. Re:Srinivasa Ramanujan? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The US hasn't had a world-class marathoner or 10K runner since the mid-80's."

      Speaking for all US citizens, we've just been broken up about it. When I was a child I would cry myself to sleep thinking about the woefull inadequacy of American long distance runners.

      -B

    37. Re:Srinivasa Ramanujan? by Simonetta · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Few would remember a name from a distant culture. But many would remember that there was a math genius from India in the early 1900's if they had heard his story once.

      There was another genius like this, only he was a musical genius. There was an African-American slave in the mid-1800's who could play nearly anything on the piano after hearing it once or twice. He was a 'field slave', not a 'house slave'. He used to sneak up to the plantation manor house and listen to visiting musicians play Bach and Mozart on the piano. He was caught one night playing Bach on piano in the manor house and only escaped being whipped to death by his unbelievable talent. He also had the ability to sit down at the piano and play any chord that someone else had just played. He could do by ear.

      His 'master', the plantation owner, took him on concert tours around the US, even to the North where this black genius was not a legally-owned slave and would have been able to receive politcal asylum and freedom. But he always returned to the plantation with the 'master', as he was illiterate and uncomfortable among the northern wealthy gentry.

      I know that this guy existed; he was a genius whose type of talent appears only in one of ten million people, but I have no idea what his name was. Maybe some Slashdotters who are seriously into African-American musical history could let us know.

    38. Re:Srinivasa Ramanujan? by famebait · · Score: 5, Funny

      All the nerds with jobs will be there, those in the US will be burger flippers (*) or on the street, and Slashdot's future audience will be over in India.

      This will in turn reduce productivity in India so much that America becomes competitive again! Brilliant!

      --
      sudo ergo sum
    39. Re:Srinivasa Ramanujan? by woginuk · · Score: 1

      If they can catch the dupes, mispellings, and other obvious errors, I'm all for outsourcing slashdot.

      That should have been 'misspellings'. And also it would do you good to read the slashdot FAQ, especially the section that deals with spelling errors.

    40. Re:Srinivasa Ramanujan? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, but perhaps a Finnish computer guy.

    41. Re:Srinivasa Ramanujan? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I find K5 to be like a hip artist in New York who thinks he's French; utterly tedious and pretentious.

    42. Re:Srinivasa Ramanujan? by thesixthreplicant · · Score: 3, Informative

      there were many maths geniuses from India during the 1900's. Bose, anyone?

    43. Re:Srinivasa Ramanujan? by Infinite+Entropy · · Score: 1

      And that freak who ran 265 miles without stopping in 75 hours. He was on Letterman.

    44. Re:Srinivasa Ramanujan? by Infinite+Entropy · · Score: 1

      I don't remember his name either but I'm pretty sure he was blind too.

    45. Re:Srinivasa Ramanujan? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I read "indian maths dude" and thought "Ramanujan".
      I just assumed everyone knew it was him and the "indian maths dude" reference was a joke. It's possible that it was.

    46. Re:Srinivasa Ramanujan? by Feztaa · · Score: 1

      How so? In my experience, K5 does a MUCH better job of hiding it's trolls than /. does, plus the whole "vote for stories" things means everybody gets to be an editor. it's brilliant! My only complaint is that there isn't anywhere near as much content as on /.

    47. Re:Srinivasa Ramanujan? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which one was Finnish? Kernighan, Richie, or Pike?

    48. Re:Srinivasa Ramanujan? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what, you mean those guys who keep the gray out?

    49. Re:Srinivasa Ramanujan? by The-Bus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "Indian self-taught math genius Srinivasa Ramanujan" works for me.

      --

      Small potatoes make the steak look bigger.

    50. Re:Srinivasa Ramanujan? by yogkarma · · Score: 2, Interesting

      ZERO is from India (the back office,3rd world country etc.) I think its time to come up with new idea to build only using ONE. Let ZERO live alone. --

      Education should be so revolutionized as to answer the wants of the poorest villager, instead of answering those of an imperial exploiter. - Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi "Mahatma"

    51. Re:Srinivasa Ramanujan? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      score 2 funny

      I'm def' a little indian gangster. Those guys got a serious deficiency. they should get more red meat

    52. Re:Srinivasa Ramanujan? by Jesus_666 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Bose, anyone?

      No, I prefer Bang & Olufsen. But thanks for the offer.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    53. Re:Srinivasa Ramanujan? by computational+super · · Score: 1

      'tis a kick in the nuts, ain't it? Maybe the trick is to write poorly?

      --
      Proud neuron in the Slashdot hivemind since 2002.
    54. Re:Srinivasa Ramanujan? by computational+super · · Score: 2, Insightful
      It appears to me that Ramanujan's name was left out purposely to help understanding and spark interest

      You know, the thing about that is... it did spark my interest, and I'd like to learn more (I've never heard of the guy), so I clicked through the links, but there wasn't much meat there. So I clicked back and decided to look through the comments to see if there were any good links on Ramanujan's theorem's suggested by /. readers. Now, here I am, three-fourths of the way down the page, having scrolled through nothing but "you're a racist". "No I'm not". "Yes you are". "Are not". "Are so". Sigh... guess I'll have to bite the bullet and do my own research.

      --
      Proud neuron in the Slashdot hivemind since 2002.
    55. Re:Srinivasa Ramanujan? by geoffspear · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Right. And in Slashdot articles about Fermat's Last Theorem, we should all expect Fermat's name to be replaced by "some French math dude".

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
    56. Re:Srinivasa Ramanujan? by kurosawdust · · Score: 3, Insightful
      OK I survived the first twenty or so "dude, that Indian guy was Ramanujan, you moron" posts without saying anything, but your "prejudice/ignorance/disrespect! I'm taking my business elsewhere!" post pushed me over the edge.

      [Gets out bullhorn:]

      It is very obvious that the submitter was CONSCIOUSLY referring to Ramanujan as "some Indian guy or something, Idontrememberhisname" in a tounge-in-cheek way, a technique frequently used by those of us who possess an actual sense of humor. Please do not be alarmed or otherwise let this information affect your propensity for righteous indignation in the future. That is all.

    57. Re:Srinivasa Ramanujan? by zungu · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I fully agree with you. Some "Indian math Guy" who is self-taught has a tone of prejudice in it. First, that he is some obscure Indian, not Ramanujan as one of the major contributors to number theory in his times. Second, some Indian math guy and self-taught seem to indicate that as if it was an accidental achievement, otherwise how can a well-educated discover something important? Slashdot needs a replacement, soon.

    58. Re:Srinivasa Ramanujan? by determined · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You're referring to the main "unamed" character in James Weldon Johnson's book, The Autobiography of an Ex-Colored Man. This book is fiction and AFAIK, the character was completely made-up. I could be wrong.

    59. Re:Srinivasa Ramanujan? by grixnair · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Instead of looking at the original post in such a negative way, perhaps you could see the reference to him being self-taught in a positive light. That a self-taught mathematician discovered something that all the PhD's and the like before him didn't is rather impressive. Perhaps it's not Slashdot that needs replacing, but the attitudes of some of it's readers.

    60. Re:Srinivasa Ramanujan? by yomahz · · Score: 1

      What matters is that this article quality on /. is substandard and causing me to look for alternatives to /.

      You must be new here. Welcome to Slashdot.

      --
      "A mind is a terrible thing to taste."
    61. Re:Srinivasa Ramanujan? by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      I don't know man, I'm a half a notch left of center and K5 makes me feel like a fundamentalist. That sight is 'WAY' to left for me.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    62. Re:Srinivasa Ramanujan? by danharan · · Score: 1
      I know that this guy existed; he was a genius whose type of talent appears only in one of ten million people
      So with 1 Billion people in India, we've got 100 geniuses from there. Assuming they don't all pioneer a new area of research, at some point we'll have to be more specific than "some Indian <domain specialist>".
      --
      Information: "I want to be anthropomorphized"
    63. Re:Srinivasa Ramanujan? by Monkelectric · · Score: 1

      Its not "too left". Its just full of trolls. They antagonize *everyone* regardless of their views. There's a handful of people who are very dedicated to destroying k5.

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    64. Re:Srinivasa Ramanujan? by drsquare · · Score: 1

      The problem with Kuroshin is that it's dead. I can go to Slashdot every day and there are a good handful of stories to read along with some good discussions. On k5, you're lucky if you get a story in a week, and then it will only have 5 comments, which no-one replies to so you can never get a good discussion. Also a lot of the stories aren't even news, but some bloke's opinion on something meaningless.

      On the other hand, the site's technically a lot better, the HTML seems to be a million times cleaner than slashdot's (what is a million times zero?) And they don't have a moderation system, which counts for something.

    65. Re:Srinivasa Ramanujan? by drsquare · · Score: 1

      Yes, I don't consider myself conservative at all, but compared to the people on there, I'm practically Adolf Hitler. The only non-left people on there are trolls trying to provide an antidote to the mindless drooling lefties thinking they're 'profound' and 'intelligent' because they post on an obscure website. Also they seem to have a terrible inferiority complex to slashdot.

    66. Re:Srinivasa Ramanujan? by drsquare · · Score: 1

      Don't tell me that people in the food industry need people skills, etc. I am NOT denying that there are smart people with skills in that industry, but the MINIMUM qualifications are nearly nil.

      Not nearly nil, they ARE nil. They don't need people skills: ever been to a fast food shop? Exactly, they're the most braindead, unfriendly, drooling people in the world. But it's only to be expected that such places attract the lowest level of scum of society. Anyone with any skills or redeeming features would get a proper job.

    67. Re:Srinivasa Ramanujan? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought the submission was written by an Indian who just wanted to emphasize the fact that Ramanujan was an Indian out of nationalistic pride. Maybe this is wrong, but if it wasn't would you be any more/less offended?

    68. Re:Srinivasa Ramanujan? by gstoddart · · Score: 1
      My thoughts exactly. I wonder, will the next article about relativity reference "some German physics guy"? Or, for that matter, should we be on the lookout for articles about an operating system software codes invented by a Finlandish computer guy?

      Well, sadly, the vast majority of mathematicians will not become household names.

      At this point, anyone who has been passed about the fourth grade or so will have at least heard the name Einstein or Newton.

      I suspect for a lot of Slashdotters (myself included) this gentleman's name is being heard for the first time. Famous to mathematicians is, well, not exactly famous.
      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    69. Re:Srinivasa Ramanujan? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I'm spending much less time here at /. than I used to aswell and I know it's our "civic duty" to moderate and meta-moderate but it just seems futile. Not wishing to start off any of those rant threads but the system seems a bit broke.

      (Please excuse some of that English, it's bad but it just sounded so nice for what I wanted to say)

    70. Re:Srinivasa Ramanujan? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the only mathematician 95% of people have heard of is Will Hunting, and maybe Ted Kazenski.

    71. Re:Srinivasa Ramanujan? by stonecypher · · Score: 1

      But I'm not sure you can assert that the nature in which Ramanujan was referred to as "Indian math guy" in the parent post, was an artifact of prejudice, ignorance, disrespect or a combination of these things and more.

      It's just because nobody can remember his name.

      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
    72. Re:Srinivasa Ramanujan? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fischer probably posts here all the time, but always gets modded Troll. The guy makes Nazis look level-headed.

    73. Re:Srinivasa Ramanujan? by Crafack · · Score: 1
      Isn't that a brand of vodka ?

      That might explain something...

      /Crafack

      --
      ... Elecance is left to the implementors.
    74. Re:Srinivasa Ramanujan? by warrior · · Score: 1

      Obligatory Simpsons Quote:

      "Oh, there's so much I don't know about astrophysics. I should've listened to that wheelchair-guy." - Homer

      I guess the submitter was, sadly, a real-life Homer Simpson.

      --
      Intel transfer the difficult from Hadware to software, for get more power, programmer need more technology. -- chinaitn
    75. Re:Srinivasa Ramanujan? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      perhaps they could help push quality up a notch.

      This will get modded into oblivion, and in all honesty I hate to say it -- but it's obvious you've never worked with offshore Indian contractors.

    76. Re:Srinivasa Ramanujan? by changcho · · Score: 1

      kurosawdust, 1st of all thanks for the interesting story. However, it is obvious that many people are VERY easily offended. Still, it'd have been a good idea to refer to Ramanujan directly, as most people who were attracted to this (Math) story would have known who he was. Cheers!

    77. Re:Srinivasa Ramanujan? by kurosawdust · · Score: 1
      kurosawdust, 1st of all thanks for the interesting story.

      Glad you enjoyed it - I did too - but I didn't submit it :). I'm just saying it was pretty obvious that the submitter was making a joke (e.g. if someone said "so-and-so claims to have invented a perpetual-motion machine. Looks A-OK to me, but didn't somebody long ago say something about that? I think he was an English guy; had something to do with an apple.") It's just a form of sarcasm, but oh man did it not go through in this case.

    78. Re:Srinivasa Ramanujan? by ackLoid · · Score: 1

      Do you work at Mickey Ds? Many children get a start working in fast-food. Try to be more compasionate.

    79. Re:Srinivasa Ramanujan? by randomblast · · Score: 1

      Forrest Gump?

      --
      ...these aren't my real teeth.
    80. Re:Srinivasa Ramanujan? by JoAnywhere · · Score: 1

      Who on earth moderated this as Insightful?

      Ramanujan's name is in the first paragraph of the article. All the author had to do was click on the link (that was included in the post) and copy/paste his name into the body of the post.

      It was utter laziness, and sloppy editorial policy. There was nothing tongue-in-cheek about it

    81. Re:Srinivasa Ramanujan? by cornjchob · · Score: 1

      But it's only to be expected that such places attract the lowest level of scum of society. Anyone with any skills or redeeming features would get a proper job.

      A proper job? You're right, you're right; shit, I almost forgot my place. Too bad my parents couldn't afford to not only pay my tuition, but they couldn't board me either. I think I'll drop out and go to my local community college to study the custodial arts so that by cleaning up your shit, I may hope to better myself. Thanks.

      --
      We now have confirmed reports from an informed Orange County minister that Ethel is still an active communist.
    82. Re:Srinivasa Ramanujan? by cornjchob · · Score: 1

      And yesterday we had "a major Australian newspaper" omitting to mention it was the "Melbourne Age". It seems that foreigners aren't worthy of having names, so it's just a waste of space to use them. But "they" really rubbed it in with this one, mentioning Ramanujan's nationality twice and still avoiding the name -- though perhaps it would have been more insulting if they'd tried to use it, considering the quality of spelling here.

      You must own a hammer company you hit that nail on the head so square. Oh, wait, that's right--you're a dumb ass. You're honestly disappointed because there was no name mentioned (going insofar to say it was "avoided"), yet where it wasn't mentioned /it linked directly to the name/, and not only that, to biographical information in the case of Ramanujan. Seriously--that's like me, an American, going to the Melbourne Age, and when they refer to some American most people outside of America (just like Ramanujan's name not being widely known outside of academia) won't know, I get upset and call them racist/nationalist. Oh my god, could it possibly be that--I know I'm going out on a limb here--that people are perhaps not only geocentric, but also know the most about the things they study and see the most? Now listen, these're all very, /very/ revolutionary and new subjects and I hasten to add I'm not even sure if /I/ believe them...however I think I might. It's not the fault of foreigners (I'm using foreigner in a global sense--anyone not native to any country) if they don't know the in's and out's; furthermore, it most certainly is _not_ an American phenomenon. While Ramanujan's additions to mathematics are incredible and should in no way be overlooked, that doesn't mean Suzy Rottencrotch needs to be held accountable for not knowing his name. Chill the hell out, or tell everyone about your ideas for a utopia (which are doubtlessly fool-proof).

      I'll be waiting to hear about 1u3hrvania, dumbass.

      --
      We now have confirmed reports from an informed Orange County minister that Ethel is still an active communist.
    83. Re:Srinivasa Ramanujan? by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      While Ramanujan's additions to mathematics are incredible and should in no way be overlooked, that doesn't mean Suzy Rottencrotch needs to be held accountable for not knowing his name.

      If someone is writing an article about him, it seems porverse to seemingly go out of your way to avoid naming him. That was my point. The reason could well have been carelessness, but it can easily be interpreted as a cultural and racial slight.

      I'll be waiting to hear about 1u3hrvania, dumbass.

      FOAD redneck.

    84. Re:Srinivasa Ramanujan? by cornjchob · · Score: 1

      The reason could well have been carelessness, but it can easily be interpreted as a cultural and racial slight

      If the arthor were truly commiting 'racial slight', why would he've mentioned Ramanujan in the first place?

      FOAD redneck.

      lol I've never heard FOAD--what's it mean? For the record I never have (and doubt I ever will) vote for the Grand ol' Party--liberals can kiss my ass, too. Libertarians and indepents all the way.

      --
      We now have confirmed reports from an informed Orange County minister that Ethel is still an active communist.
    85. Re:Srinivasa Ramanujan? by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      If the arthor were truly commiting 'racial slight', why would he've mentioned Ramanujan in the first place?

      He DIDN'T mention Ramanujan at all. It's like saying "The tsunami hit a number of Asian countries, lots of Asians died". Meanwhile, in more important news, the Michel Jackson trial...

      lol I've never heard FOAD

      If you know LOL, you really should know FOAD.

    86. Re:Srinivasa Ramanujan? by cornjchob · · Score: 1

      He DIDN'T mention Ramanujan at all. It's like saying "The tsunami hit a number of Asian countries, lots of Asians died". Meanwhile, in more important news, the Michel Jackson trial...

      a) He DID mention Ramanujan--he just didn't do so by name. What I was trying to say before it was obfuscated by some lame ass subterfuge about the media (carried further by some horrid attempt to allude to your own wordliness by condemning the masses because of what they think matters) is that if the author were truly commiting 'racial slight', he would've failed to give any mention of Ramanujan at all--this, mind you, includes mentioning "Indian math guy"

      FOAD redneck

      You make a statement of that magnitude, and yet /still/ don't submit your view of utopia. I mean, you're absolutely right--I'm a redneck. That is, I'd be a redneck if my long hair didn't cover my neck and I weren't going to art museums and disagreeing with Bush so often. Dumb ass.

      --
      We now have confirmed reports from an informed Orange County minister that Ethel is still an active communist.
    87. Re:Srinivasa Ramanujan? by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      a) He DID mention Ramanujan--he just didn't do so by name.

      That's a pretty amazing statement. I'll just leave you to hang yourself with it.

      >FOAD redneck
      You make a statement of that magnitude

      No, simply a response to your repeatd "dumb ass" insults. But the whole problem is that you think it's pefectly all right for you, or the original poster, to insult and belittle, and if anyone complains, let alone responds in kind, that they're just subject to more ridicule.

  2. Let's not use real names or give any credit. by Leknor · · Score: 3, Funny

    Let's not use real names or give any credit to some guy.

    1. Re:Let's not use real names or give any credit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Ramanujan stole my job as a Perl coder!

    2. Re:Let's not use real names or give any credit. by Satan+Gave+Me+a+Taco · · Score: 1
    3. Re:Let's not use real names or give any credit. by Surt · · Score: 0

      I swear to god my job as a perl coder was right there on my desk, and Ramanujan was the only person in here with me!

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    4. Re:Let's not use real names or give any credit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is it just me, or do upwards of half of the jokes on Slashdot somehow involve South Park?

    5. Re:Let's not use real names or give any credit. by DarkHelmet · · Score: 0
      Am I the only person who noticed that the story below this is "Science Guy Returns".

      Maybe Indian Math Guy will end up being syndicated soon.

      --
      /^[A-Z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Z0-9.-]+\.[A-Z]{2,4}$/i
    6. Re:Let's not use real names or give any credit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You too??!

    7. Re:Let's not use real names or give any credit. by SomeGuyFromCA · · Score: 1

      hey! where's my credit?

      --
      if the answer isn't violence, neither is your silence / freedom of expression doesn't make it alright
    8. Re:Let's not use real names or give any credit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's not just you. The typical Slashbot doesn't have any creative imagination, nor a sense of humour of its own. It's much easier to throw in a South Park/The Simpsons/Futurama/whatever quote and cash in the +5 Funnies.

      Not even slashbot memes such as "in Soviet Russia", "I for one welcome our new X overlords", or "1. Do X, 2. ???, 3. Profit!" are original creations.

      BTW, the article misspelled "maths".

      /Not American.

    9. Re:Let's not use real names or give any credit. by zurtle · · Score: 1
      I'm not sure about the first two, but the last one is definitely a Southpark reference, hurrah for the Underpants Gnomes!

      I started using the "I for one welcome our new X overlords" thing at work... I guess I'm just another FUBAR /. no-brainer.

      Laziness is good... the actual word is "mathematics"; the English world says "maths", the American world took the laziness one step further to "math"

      I, for one, welcome our new laziness overlords who use the following method...

      1. In Soviet Russia, be lazy
      2. In Soviet Russia, ???????
      3. Profit in a Roublesque fashion.

      --
      Couldn't stand the weather
    10. Re:Let's not use real names or give any credit. by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's almost as insulting as, say, spelling his name wrong, since that's not an easy name for most native Englsh-speakers to spell...

    11. Re:Let's not use real names or give any credit. by ComputerSlicer23 · · Score: 0
      "I for one welcome our new overloads", I first heard on the Simpsons, it was said in season 4 or 5 by the character "Kent Brockman" during a news broadcast. I forget the exact reference.

      The underpants thing, is from South Park. I've never seen it, but I'm your reference to "Underpants Gnomes" is familiar.

      "In Soviet Russia", is from Yakov Smirnov. I first heard it said on Night Court (a pretty funny show in it's day). However, he was a standup comedian, so it might have been a part of his act before that.

      Those might not be the original sources, but they are the cultural references I remember it from.

      Kirby

    12. Re:Let's not use real names or give any credit. by Kuro-Bishounen · · Score: 1

      For the sake of exactness, it's the Homer in Space episode. When he spills the ants et chips.

      --
      Evil Space Monkeys could be stealing YOUR bandwidth!
    13. Re:Let's not use real names or give any credit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kent Brockman, Simpsons, "Deep Space Homer": "Ladies and gentlemen, uh, we've just lost the picture, but what we've seen speaks for itself. The Corvair spacecraft has apparently been taken over -- 'conquered' if you will -- by a master race of giant space ants. It's difficult to tell from this vantage point whether they will consume the captive earth men or merely enslave them. One thing is for certain: there is no stopping them; the ants will soon be here. And I for one welcome our new insect overlords. I'd like to remind them that as a trusted TV personality, I can be helpful in rounding up others to toil in their underground sugar caves."

      Underpants / "1) 2) 3) Profit!" is from the episode "Gnomes", South Park Season 2. It's the one where Starbucks comes to town and Tweak's dad recruits the boys for some anti-corporate propoganda.

      If Smirnov didn't coin the "in Soviet Russia" bit, he definately popularized it.

    14. Re:Let's not use real names or give any credit. by Surt · · Score: 1

      Wow, overrated on an unmoderated post, awesome job mods!

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
  3. ramanujan by Ed+Pegg · · Score: 5, Informative

    More on Ramanujan at St. Andrews
    Also at physorg.
    It all deals with the Partition function.

    1. Re:ramanujan by th3space · · Score: 1

      I read a bit about him in the Paul Erdos biography, 'The Man Who Loved Only Numbers"...tragic loss to the world of math when, but his contributions were significant, to say the least.

      --
      "How like you to drag your keyboard to a gun fight." - Aaron Bedard (BANE)
  4. Interesting by winkydink · · Score: 4, Funny

    The Indian mathematician outsourced this to a US grad student

    --

    "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    1. Re:Interesting by orkysoft · · Score: 1

      And Anonymous Cowards are racists and bigots, rarely can they actually come up with an interesting post.

      --

      I suffer from attention surplus disorder.
    2. Re:Interesting by rbarreira · · Score: 1

      Is your sig only valid in Soviet Russia? :) You should update it...

      --

      The AACS key is NOT 0xF606EEFD628B1CA427BEA93A9CA9773F
    3. Re:Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, and indians aren't finally debating actually respecting patents right now.

    4. Re:Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      This proves that outsourced projects take longer. Almost a century for crying out loud!

    5. Re:Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Respecting" patents? Patents don't deserve respect, it's all just the same clickedy clack anyway.

  5. Why is this important to us? by cflorio · · Score: 3, Informative

    "Andrews says the methods used to arrive at the result will probably be applicable to problems in areas far afield from mathematics. He and Mahlburg note partitions have been used previously in understanding the various ways particles can arrange themselves, as well as in encrypting credit card information sent over the internet."

    1. Re:Why is this important to us? by rewt66 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, group theory is a fairly abstract area of math, but it winds up being used in the error-correction codes on CDs.

      Relations were just an obscure mathematical area until Codd came along.

      I'm sure there are plenty of other examples...

    2. Re:Why is this important to us? by ShadeARG · · Score: 1

      I was wondering about compression. If you can find patterns in how all numbers work, then shouldn't you be able to reconstruct much larger data with the very "dna" of it? After all, binary data is just one (huge) number in base 2.

    3. Re:Why is this important to us? by Jerf · · Score: 4, Interesting

      No.

      Compression algorithms map one huge number (consider an entire file as one huge number) to another. They "work" because most huge numbers of interest in a given domain aren't valid; random ASCII is gibberish, not English, so we remap that "random" looking stuff to stuff of more interest. This allows us to pack the interesting things much more tightly into the small numbers.

      But for every number we shorten, we must also lengthen a number. Real-world algorithms do clever things to minimize the real-world impact of this fact, so you don't see it, but it's obvious if you think about it. If you have a sequence "1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10" which maps back to 1-10, for every number you pull down (move 8 -> 2), another number moves up.

      No matter what you do, you can't create a magical compression algorithm that can be the "DNA" of all other numbers. You didn't say this directly, but a lot of people have this idea floating around in their head and I sort of "smell" it in your post.

      (Proof: Suppose you have a compression algorithm that always shortens a number, and the corresponding decryption function. (Note we don't assume anything about the nature of the algorithm other than the compression, so it applies to all such algorithms, no matter how fancy the math.) Of the binary numbers 00, 01, 10, 11, each is therefore shortened to 1 bit. But there are only two possibilities for that one bit, and it has to cover 4 numbers. This is not possible for a decompression function by definition of "function". Therefore, contradiction, and there is no such compression algorithm.

      I left the terminology a little fuzzy to try to prevent Math Overload; mathematicians should be able to fill in the blanks fairly easily.)

    4. Re:Why is this important to us? by gfody · · Score: 1

      I think it may not be important at all. Studying the patterns that come up in determining all possible groups that add up to a certain number seems pointless. take the number 8 for example

      8
      71
      611
      5111
      41111
      311111
      211111 1
      11111111
      62
      521
      4211 422
      32111 3221
      221111 22211 2222
      53
      431
      3311 332
      44

      there are 22 ways to 'make' 8. and this is suppose to be important for some reason.. but it ignores negative numbers entirely! if you include negative numbers then there are infinite ways to make any number.

      its like the pattern when you multiply 11111x11111 and see 123454321.. it seems interesting if you punched it into a calculator, but when you work it out the long way you realize the pattern has nothing to do with the numbers just how we write them.

      --

      bite my glorious golden ass.
    5. Re:Why is this important to us? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      QED motherfucker.

      Actually, that should be GED motherfucker! GET 'ER DONE!

    6. Re:Why is this important to us? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      You are oh so wrong! I have developed an algorithm that will compress any file to an arbitrarily small size! There are still a few problems with accuracy, but it really works, given enough time.

    7. Re:Why is this important to us? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for your post. I'm not much of a mathematician, so i'll have fun filling in the blanks for myself. :)

    8. Re:Why is this important to us? by nate+nice · · Score: 1

      "There are still a few problems with accuracy..."

      Your algorithm doesn't work and when you iron these things out you will see why it won't work. Good luck and have exploring it! Maybe, but I doubt it, you have stumbled upon an idea never conceived by man, but much well defined and studied formal theory says you're probably wrong.

      --
      "If you are a dreamer, a wisher, a liar, A hope-er, a pray-er, a magic bean buyer ..."
    9. Re:Why is this important to us? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suspect he's joking, and his algorithm involves a "rm $filename" step. After all, he said it'll compress the files but he didn't say it'll decompress them afterwards...

    10. Re:Why is this important to us? by SirCyn · · Score: 1

      encrypting credit card information sent over the internet

      Because we all know credit card information is the most important information sent over the net.

      http://apple.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/03/23/ 0122224&tid=176&tid=141&tid=3
      http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/03/22/185 8243&tid=172&tid=158
      http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/03/22/141 1236&tid=172

      and that's just from today...

    11. Re:Why is this important to us? by gnovos · · Score: 1

      (Proof: Suppose you have a compression algorithm that always shortens a number, and the corresponding decryption function. (Note we don't assume anything about the nature of the algorithm other than the compression, so it applies to all such algorithms, no matter how fancy the math.) Of the binary numbers 00, 01, 10, 11, each is therefore shortened to 1 bit. But there are only two possibilities for that one bit, and it has to cover 4 numbers. This is not possible for a decompression function by definition of "function". Therefore, contradiction, and there is no such compression algorithm.

      Well.... if the ONLY information you wanted to store were 00, 01, 10 or 00 you could do compression on that! basically
      0 == 00,
      01 == 01,
      10 == 10,
      1 == 11

      Now you can use as little as 1 bit of information half the time. But the catch is, there is "meta" information in the stream. Basically as soon as you want to store two of such numbers you need some way to seperate them...

      --
      "Your superior intellect is no match for our puny weapons!"
    12. Re:Why is this important to us? by nate+nice · · Score: 1

      Figured just the same but thought I would offer something simple in case he really thinks otherwise.

      I didn't see the "rm $filename" part though which would indeed make it obvious. Thanx.

      --
      "If you are a dreamer, a wisher, a liar, A hope-er, a pray-er, a magic bean buyer ..."
    13. Re:Why is this important to us? by xtord · · Score: 0, Troll

      You're wrong.

      You cannot decompress that stream since if you compress
      0011 you get 01
      Please tell me how you distinguish that from just having compressed 01.

      Now add length coding so you know the resulting length then you can decompress the earlier example but not:

      010011
      0101

      There are two options, both equally probable.

      Compressing something isn't difficult, but if you want it to be able to decompress then you have to think of something more clever.

      Read a basic book on information theory and compression.

    14. Re:Why is this important to us? by dylan_- · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Your explanation is good, but I think maybe too complicated for the average punter. I tried to write the simplest one I could and came up with the following. Any comments appreciated (especially if it makes it simpler; the only vaguely technical word I've used in it is "compresssion" and since that's the topic, I think that fair):

      Why you can't keep compressing a computer file and why no system of compression can compress every file.

      The most important thing to remember here is that computer files are just numbers. BIG numbers, right enough, but numbers none the less. For example:

      111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 10 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000111111 111111111111111111111111111

      or

      10110001 00101101 10100001

      could be computer files (pretty short ones, but they're just examples). Now, obviously, if you're compressing a file, you're representing a big file by a smaller one. For instance, we could represent the first number by the second one.

      Consider if you had to represent all the numbers up to 100 with just 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5. Not "51" or "43", just those five numbers. Well, of course, you can't. You could have 1 == 67 and 2 == 83 and 3 == 98 and 4 == 55 and 5 == 12 but then you're out of numbers. You can only represent five different ones.

      So, that's why you can't have a universal compression scheme, and why you can't keep compressing a compressed file: because there are more big numbers than there are small numbers!

      --
      Igor Presnyakov stole my hat
    15. Re:Why is this important to us? by clambake · · Score: 1

      You're wrong.

      You cannot decompress that stream since if you compress
      0011 you get 01


      That was the entire POINT of the last post, dude.

      You can compress a single value ONLY. So you can have 1, 10, 01, or 0., compression of .5 bits of information on average. But the instant you want a SECOND value then you're screwed.

    16. Re:Why is this important to us? by naoursla · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You don't have an optimal solution to compress a single message:

      If I say nothing, assume 00
      If I say 0, assume 01
      If I say 1, assume 10
      If I say 01, assume 11

      Assuming a uniform distribution of the message, you can expect 1 bit of data to be transmitted.

      However, this is a fake example. Given an information channel I need to define lots of things like what I am using to represent 0 and 1 and how often signals are expected.

      Say I have a telegraph wire. Each second I transmit a short signal (dot .) for 0 and a long signal (dash -) for 1. Translate my example to this scheme and we get:

      nothing nothing = 00
      . nothing = 01
      - nothing = 10 .- = 11

      Notice that I am really using 3 symbols for each signal. 3 symbols = log2(3) bits = 1.58 bits. I am using 2 symbols per message so I am sending a 2 bit message in just over 3 bits.

      Your example is the same:

      0 == 00,
      01 == 01,
      10 == 10,
      1 == 11

      I receive a 0, should I complete the message or wait for a 1? How long should I wait? The answer to that sets the baud (symbol rate). If you wait and don't receive a 1 then you have received and 'empty' symbol (or end-of-file if you want to call it that). You encoding scheme is basically the same as my 'fake' one above.

      If the messages you want to transmit (say 00, 01, 10, 11) all appear with the same regularity then you cannot compress the signal stream. However, if some of the bit pairs appear more often then we can use something like Huffman encoding to get a better bit count:

      00 - 50%
      01 - 25%
      10 - 12.5%
      11 - 12.5%

      00 = 0
      01 = 10
      10 = 110
      11 = 111

      So a message like
      00 01 00 10 11
      would be
      0100110111

      I am pretty sure this is unambiguous.

      This encoding scheme gives us an average bit count of: .5*1 + .25 *2 + .125*3 + .125*3 = 1.75 bits per 2 bits sent

      We can use entropy calculations to determine how much real information we would be getting in the original stream:
      -0.5*log2(0.5) - 0.25*log2(0.25) - 2*0.125*log2(0.125) = 1.75 bits

      Since the transmitted bit rate is the same as the message entropy the encoding scheme is optimal.

    17. Re:Why is this important to us? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, as a practical matter, you can't shorten them all, but you can at least make them no longer (trivially by reusing bits already hidden in the filesystem, otherwise you theoretically add 1 bit)

      Take your compression program C(x) and decompression program D(x), let . herein denote concatenation and then compute:

      compress(x) returns message M {
      if (length(C(x)) > length(x))
      {
      M = 1 . x; // This just adds 1 bit.
      } else {
      M = 0 . C(x);
      }
      return M;
      }

      decompress(x) returns message M {
      switch (first_bit_of(x))
      {
      case '0':
      // compressed
      M = D(every_bit_after_the_first_of(x));
      break;
      case '1':
      // flagged uncompressed
      M = every_bit_after_the_first_of(x);
      break;
      default:
      // WTF code, program aborts
      error("first_bit_of() returned invalid value: " . first_bit_of(x));
      }
      return M;
      }

      In practice, I'd simply hide that extra bit in some slack space or in the filename where no one would likely care. Thus, with only 1 bit demarkating whether C(x) was able to compress the program, I can at least limit how much larger I make things. As you said--it's NOT able to shrink all things (some grow by a bit, but a bit is also easy to reclaim from wasted bits in the filesystem in practice), but it's not as bad as it sounds :)

  6. Vaguest post I've ever seen by StateOfTheUnion · · Score: 5, Informative
    A century ago, a self-taught math genius from India noticed some patterns in how numbers can be created by adding other numbers.

    That's got to be the worst write up I've ever seen on /.

    This statement implies that the genius is famous because he noticed that there is/are pattern(s) in how you can add up numbers to get other numbers . . . that statement is so vague that the discovery could be incredible or intuitively obvious.

    Quoted from one of the links is a much better explanation below:

    One remarkable result of the Hardy-Ramanujan collaboration was a formula for the number p(n) of partitions of a number n. A partition of a positive integer n is just an expression for n as a sum of positive integers, regardless of order. Thus p(4) = 5 because 4 can be written as 1+1+1+1, 1+1+2, 2+2, 1+3, or 4. The problem of finding p(n) was studied by Euler, who found a formula for the generating function of p(n) (that is, for the infinite series whose nth term is p(n)xn). While this allows one to calculate p(n) recursively, it doesn't lead to an explicit formula. Hardy and Ramanujan came up with such a formula (though they only proved it works asymptotically; Rademacher proved it gives the exact value of p(n)).

    1. Re:Vaguest post I've ever seen by multiplexo · · Score: 1
      So is p(n) Euler's totient? Or is that something different?

      --
      cheap labor conservatives - they want to keep you hungry enough to be thankful for minimum wage.
    2. Re:Vaguest post I've ever seen by Xyrus · · Score: 1

      I have a feeling this may be used as a stepping stone for a proof of the Goldbach conjecture (string binary form).

      ~X~

      --
      ~X~
    3. Re:Vaguest post I've ever seen by quarkscat · · Score: 2, Funny

      Not only that, but in other news:

      MSFT has just submitted a software patent on
      adding numbers together, based upon this f(n).

      The number 7(TM) has been brought to you by MSFT.

    4. Re:Vaguest post I've ever seen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So is p(n) Euler's totient? Or is that something different?

      Euler's totient is something different: how many numbers x below n have ggT(x,n)=1.

    5. Re:Vaguest post I've ever seen by computational+super · · Score: 1

      Hmmm... how so?

      --
      Proud neuron in the Slashdot hivemind since 2002.
  7. Alteranative Text by Cheapy · · Score: 3, Informative

    Straight from the horses mouth... http://www.news.wisc.edu/10833.html I saw that a few days ago during the Nanotechnology article; I never thought of submitting it.

    --
    Would you kindly mod me +1 insightful?
    1. Re:Alteranative Text by Cheapy · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Hate to reply to my own post, but sorry for not formatting.

      --
      Would you kindly mod me +1 insightful?
    2. Re:Alteranative Text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Dang. Hate to reply to my own reply, but sorry for not including the formatted link in the reply!

    3. Re:Alteranative Text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hate to reply to my own reply to my own reply, but sorry for not using the word "Berkshire" in the reply!

    4. Re:Alteranative Text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Hate to reply to my own reply to my own reply to my own reply, but sorry for not mentioning how pretty rainbows are in the reply!

    5. Re:Alteranative Text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      STFU h8ers!

  8. You could at least use his name in the article by Matchstick · · Score: 1, Redundant

    His name is Ramanujan. You may just be trying to be cute by calling him "Indian math guy", but give him some props too. Hiding his name in the URL isn't enough.

    1. Re:You could at least use his name in the article by woof321 · · Score: 2, Funny

      That German physics guy was in the news today, too. Interesting that they both came up with their ideas while working as a clerk. Maybe Dante and Randal will eventually lick cold fusion or something.

    2. Re:You could at least use his name in the article by WasterDave · · Score: 1

      I guess we'll find out what Silent Bob has been thinking about all this time as well.

      --
      I write a blog now, you should be afraid.
    3. Re:You could at least use his name in the article by craXORjack · · Score: 2, Funny

      I am a self taught web surfer from Indiana. I like puzzles and I like the way the editor drew me into the article by allowing me to discern the genius's name by noticing a pattern in the name of the embedded url. Just like Sesame Street's "One of these things is not like the others" game, audience participation turned this article from a whoa :( to a wow :D. I give it two hearty thumbs up!

      --
      Liberals call everyone Nazis yet they are the closest thing to it.
    4. Re:You could at least use his name in the article by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 3, Funny

      This reminds me of that movie, you know? The one about that guy that did stuff?

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    5. Re:You could at least use his name in the article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This reminds me of that movie, you know? The one about that guy that did stuff?

      You clearly mean "Big Trouble In Little China" -1986

  9. Dissappointing by Yeshua · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That Ramanujan is refered to as `that Indian math guy'...

    I thought this was news for nerds, sure maybe not everyone knows who Ramanujan was, but a good proportion should, at least enough that you don't have to demean him with a vague description.

    1. Re:Dissappointing by Lisandro · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You know, it bothered me too. I know it was most certainly not on purpose, but you could refer to him like other than "that math indian guy".

      Seemed disrespectful to me - specially for a guy who's probably brighter than 99% of anyone in ./, regardless of nationality.

    2. Re:Dissappointing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll bet that's what his title would be on his business card if he worked in Silicon Valley today

    3. Re:Dissappointing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You got slashdot editors dropped out from college. They can tell you editors and playmates each month. Move on. Stop crying.

    4. Re:Dissappointing by op00to · · Score: 1

      I'm glad you came up with this insightful and UNIQUE contribution to this story. You know, instead of DISCUSSING the SUBJECT MATTER, you bitch about the writeup. No one else brought this to our attention, and I'm now sure that Ramanujan can finally rest.

    5. Re:Dissappointing by lostwanderer147 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Even more disappointing than being referenced as "that Indian math guy" is the general /. reaction to the article. First off, RTFA, where it does try to explain what is meant by "adding up numbers," albeit somewhat poorly. Second, the general reaction shows that they needed to simplify it that much. As one previous commenter said, he's a genius, and people are making outsourcing jokes. Third, I'm disappointed that people are getting modded as "funny" when they make those jokes. I am not flamebaiting or trolling, and I am not a stiff prude, but I wish people would think before they posted, and before they modded.

      That said, the man was brilliant. It is only too bad that he died before he could do any more than he did. He had the potential to make breakthroughs in the same way that Newton, Einstein, etc. did. If only Hardy had let him continue to work in India...(Many people attribute his death to the unfamiliar climate of England. I know that he died of TB, but it is likely that he wouldn't have caught it had he remained in India.)

    6. Re:Dissappointing by QMO · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "If only Hardy had let him continue to work in India"

      IMO:
      He could not have worked in India. He needed a lot of personal tutoring and contact with first-rate mathematicians, and there haven't been many mathemeticians as first-rate as G. H. Hardy.

      Whether the early death was worth (to the world or to Ramanujan) the growth (to math, to Ramanujan, and to Hardy) that came from the Ramanujan-Hardy collaboration, I don't know.

      --
      Exam 4/C again. Maybe I'll do better this time.
    7. Re:Dissappointing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh...and for all the non-math geeks, they could have at least referred to him as 'that Indian math guy mentioned in "Good Will Hunting"'

    8. Re:Dissappointing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol

      We didn't get much mathematics out of this discussion but at least I got one good laugh

    9. Re:Dissappointing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hardy remarked near the end of his career that he was proudest of having collaborated with Ramanujan and Littlewood "as equals".

      That was one of those warm fuzzy moments... John Lennon similarly described his career as a long partnership with McCartney followed by another partnership with Yoko Ono, and "that ain't bad picking".

    10. Re:Dissappointing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For God's sake, stop harping about the Indian guy.

      Finally somebody finishes the job and all he gets is "some grad student".

    11. Re:Dissappointing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Suppose that we rate mathematicians on the basis of pure talent on a scale from 0 to 100, G.H. Hardy gave himself a score of 25, Littlewood 30, Hilbert 80 and Ramanujan 100.

      I'd say Ramanujan was a smarter than a lot more than just 99% of us.

    12. Re:Dissappointing by bonafidehan · · Score: 1

      ummm... 99%?!? It's more like 100%. solid. I mean, at least 99% of /. is the average a-little-above-the-average, anyways.

    13. Re:Dissappointing by FlashBuster3000 · · Score: 1

      If I'm not mistaken he is mentioned in "Good Will Hunting" as an example for a genius, that was discovered..
      At least viewers of the movie may know him.

    14. Re:Dissappointing by GauteL · · Score: 1

      "specially for a guy who's probably brighter than 99% of anyone in ./, regardless of nationality."

      If Slashdot only has about a million readers it would still mean that about ten thousand Slashdot readers are as bright or brighter than Ramanujan.

      Somehow I don't think that is the case.

      He was probably brighter than ALL Slashdot readers, but to allow for the possibility of me replying to a super-genius, let's say 99,99999%

    15. Re:Dissappointing by Lisandro · · Score: 1

      He was probably brighter than ALL Slashdot readers, but to allow for the possibility of me replying to a super-genius, let's say 99,99999%

      Much obliged. Though i preffer the term "intelectually superior" :)

    16. Re:Dissappointing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I was as intelectually superior as you I wouldn't bother with spelling either.

    17. Re:Dissappointing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you wouldn't bother bitching at a joke either...

    18. Re:Dissappointing by gokeln · · Score: 1

      Hardy could have gone to India, to support his better.

      --

      There's no time to stop for gas, we're already late.
  10. Considering the current economy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...it was cheaper for the American to do it than the Indian.

  11. The Indian math guy!?? by whitehatlurker · · Score: 0, Redundant
    The "guy" is pretty famous - you really should include his real name. (As others have noted, it's Ramanujan.) I suppose that most of the replies in this thread are going to be rants about this slight.

    Hmmm. Submitters, please spend some time on your submission ... oftimes it gets all of the flack, and if you do it properly, it should not get any.

    --
    .. paranoid crackpot leftover from the days of Amiga.
    1. Re:The Indian math guy!?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Submitters, please spend some time on your submission ... oftimes it gets all of the flack, and if you do it properly, it should not get any.

      Why bother? They're almost always rejected.

    2. Re:The Indian math guy!?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's to ensure we're only getting the highest quality articles that we're so used to.

  12. Wow... by oddman · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I didn't even understand the news article.

    Me am sure math smart.

    1. Re:Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And so good at english to boot.

    2. Re:Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who invented the construct "to boot" anyway? It makes absolutely no sense. And X to boot. Boot what?

  13. yeah by cheese_wallet · · Score: 4, Funny

    a self-taught math genius from India noticed some patterns in how numbers can be created by adding other numbers.

    yeah, I saw that too. Like, how if you have a 4, and add a 1, you get a 5. It's pretty cool.

    1. Re:yeah by Ploum · · Score: 1

      But we can extend further the theory : add a 3 and a 2, you will have..... fuck, it's 5 again.

      I'm not sure to understand but thank you /. for all this wonderful science !

    2. Re:yeah by imsabbel · · Score: 1

      yo. I can see it. The next story about a new cpu relase will have the discription "They created a machine that can calculate things, and this one is different from the ones before"
      Come on. This is news for nerds, not news for joe sixpack.

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    3. Re:yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By following the currently popular methods of scientific research we can conclude that adding any number to any other number will give you 5. Please excuse me while I go over my taxes again now.

    4. Re:yeah by Xiaran · · Score: 1

      yeah, I saw that too. Like, how if you have a 4, and add a 1, you get a 5. It's pretty cool.

      Someone was telling me about something even neater the other day. Apparently there is this thing called "subtraction" which can return the original number. So to use you cool example... if we "subtracte" one from 5 we get 4 again. Wicked.

      Oh and yes... yall should have mentioned his name in the story.

      Vote Quimby !

  14. meth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    "We would not have expected that the crank would have been the right answer to so many of these congruence theorems"

    ah crank.. is there anything it cant do?

    1. Re:meth by Man+in+Spandex · · Score: 1

      Can't make you have some buttzeks with Richard Simmons now can it? :^

    2. Re:meth by Mazem · · Score: 1

      Hey, Paul Erdos was known to do meth while working on proofs.

    3. Re:meth by jcuervo · · Score: 1

      Damn it!

      Every time someone posts a Wikipedia link, I get stuck there all night.

      --
      Assume I was drunk when I posted this.
  15. A great leap for Indian Academia! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I find it's extraordinary that such a theorem hailed from the greatest democracy in the world. It shows that the Indian universities are producing top-notch talent and are able to compete with leading western nations in regards to know-how.

    It is not surpising that a lot of multi-nationals have decided to bring some of their work here where the talent pool is a lot deeper and where workers don't have extreme demands like in the UK or Germany.

    This will only enhance the reputation of India on the global scale.

    Which is nice.

    1. Re:A great leap for Indian Academia! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      he died ages ago so his story says nothing about the current state of indian education.

      he was also self taught so his story says nothing about the current state of indian education.

  16. Can you break it down a little more, please? by nulbit · · Score: 0, Troll

    From summary: some patterns in how numbers can be created by adding other numbers Fucking genius!

    1. Re:Can you break it down a little more, please? by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1
      Sure. To start with, we have the ASCII value for the letter F, 70.

      Now, than can be described as:

      • 70
      • 69+1
      • 68+1+1, 68+2
      • 67+1+1+1, 67+2+1, 67+3
      • 66+1+1+1+1, 66+2+1+1, 66+3+1, 66+4
      • 65+...
    2. Re:Can you break it down a little more, please? by igny · · Score: 1
      From summary: some patterns in how numbers can be created by adding other numbers Fucking genius!
      If you RTFA, it is much more than that. They discovered that p(n) may be divisible by 5,7,11 and other prime numbers.
      --
      In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is. - Yogi Berra
    3. Re:Can you break it down a little more, please? by Legion303 · · Score: 1

      Actually, TFA is really annoyingly written. To paraphrase: "Ramanujan noticed that most numbers can be expressed as sums of other numbers." No shit, Sherlock. While that wasn't what he "noticed" about numbers at all, _New Scientist_ puts a large emphasis on it so they can segue into the concept of partitions. The author needs to be dragged out into the street and beaten.

  17. Na-hee-na-na-jar by Spankophile · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Na-hee, na-na-jar. Na-hee-na-na-jar.

    It's not that difficult."

    "Yeah, well at least your name isn't Michael Bolton."

    1. Re:Na-hee-na-na-jar by kryogen1x · · Score: 4, Funny

      "We'll be getting rid of these people here... First, Mr. Samir Naga... Naga... Naga... Not gonna work here anymore, anyway."

    2. Re:Na-hee-na-na-jar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Na-hee-na-na-jar-jar-binks

  18. Well said. by AtariAmarok · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Well said. Now, watch for flamebait about "curry" and Indians stealing jobs from Americans.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    1. Re:Well said. by DA-MAN · · Score: 1

      Well said. Now, watch for flamebait about "curry" and Indians stealing jobs from Americans.

      Just remember the dying words of Uncle Sandeep

      "With great curry comes great responsibility!"

      --
      Can I get an eye poke?
      Dog House Forum
  19. What's in a name? by StateOfTheUnion · · Score: 0, Redundant
    With all due respect, why was this "Indian math guy's" name left out of the original post?

    I'd be willing to bet that if it was a European name, it would have been included in the post . . . because it would have been easier for Timothy to remember and write.

    I can only assume that this is another example of Timothy's lazy, lax, and lame journalism . . .

    1. Re:What's in a name? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    2. Re:What's in a name? by oskillator · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I'd be willing to bet that if it was a European name, it would have been included in the post

      The summary didn't name Karl Mahlburg, the subject of the article, either.

    3. Re:What's in a name? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd be willing to bet that if it was a European name, it would have been included in the post

      Don't worry too much...I'm sure Indians would refer to you as simply the "pretentious white guy".

    4. Re:What's in a name? by slavemowgli · · Score: 1

      Amen. One can only hope timothy will get kicked from the editor crew as soon as possible.

      --
      quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur.
    5. Re:What's in a name? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      timothy didn't write it. Although the writer was lazy, lax, and lame, he did however get his sources right which is more than we can say for you.

    6. Re:What's in a name? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a racist, man! Yeah, well, you're an asshole! etc etc etc etc.

      Leave it to Slashdot readers to ignore the genuinely interesting, though hard, innalekshooal stuff and reduce it all to a the cheapest possible pissing contest, each upon the other. ..okay, you can put'em away know and zip'em up...

  20. Discoverer? by Repton · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It is interesting that the New Scientist article basically attributes the idea of studying number partitions to Ramanujan, yet the linked article on him mentions that Euler had studied the problem before, and given a partial solution...

    --
    Repton.
    They say that only an experienced wizard can do the tengu shuffle.
    1. Re:Discoverer? by kaalamaadan · · Score: 1
      Euler gave a series solution to the partition problem. It is a recurrence relation. (I think.)

      Hardy-Ramanujan partition function is a direct formula and gives an easy asymptotic estimate. The series form for this was proven by Hans Rademacher.

      Partition function from Mathworld.

  21. Obilgatory story by uniqueCondition · · Score: 5, Interesting

    GH Hardy (he wrote A Mathematician's Apology) speaking of Ramanujan:

    I remember once going to see him when he was lying ill at Putney. I had ridden in taxi cab number 1729 and remarked that the number seemed to me rather a dull one, and that I hoped it was not an unfavorable omen. "No," he replied, "it is a very interesting number; it is the smallest number expressible as the sum of two cubes in two different ways."

    (London 1940).

    --
    "The more you know, the less sure you are." - Voltaire
    1. Re:Obilgatory story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
      1^3 + 12^3 = 1 + 1728 = 1729

      9^3 + 10^3 = 729 + 1000 = 1729

    2. Re:Obilgatory story by DoomHaven · · Score: 1

      Those are 10^3 + 9^3 and 1^3 + 12^3, correct?

      --
      "Don't mind me cutting myself on Occam's Razor"
    3. Re:Obilgatory story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
    4. Re:Obilgatory story by iamlucky13 · · Score: 1

      One of my favorite stories about a mathematician. Thanks for posting that.

    5. Re:Obilgatory story by grammar+fascist · · Score: 1

      "No," he replied, "it is a very interesting number; it is the smallest number expressible as the sum of two cubes in two different ways."

      If you want to know how else 1729 is interesting, you can look it up in The On-Line Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences.

      Of course, every positive integer is interesting. Proof: Assume the contrary. That means there exists a smallest uninteresting positive integer. Hey, that's pretty interesting! A contradiction.

      I think it'd be cool if Neil Sloane, who maintains the Encyclopedia, wrote a program that started with an ordered set containing all integers up to some huge number and removed every integer from every sequence in his database. It'd be very interesting to see what was left...like, the most boring numbers we know. For now.

      --
      I got my Linux laptop at System76.
    6. Re:Obilgatory story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      Reminds me of an introduction in a textbook (it might have been a quantum mechanics book, i cannot remember).

      it said "the world needs another quantum mechanics textbook the way it needs another table of known integers". probably the best joke i've read doing physics homework at 4 in the morning.

    7. Re:Obilgatory story by biobogonics · · Score: 3, Funny

      Obilgatory story (Score:5, Interesting)
      by uniqueCondition (769252) on Tuesday March 22, @07:45PM (#12018209)
      GH Hardy (he wrote A Mathematician's Apology) speaking of Ramanujan:

      I remember once going to see him when he was lying ill at Putney. I had ridden in taxi cab number 1729 and remarked that the number seemed to me rather a dull one, and that I hoped it was not an unfavorable omen. "No," he replied, "it is a very interesting number; it is the smallest number expressible as the sum of two cubes in two different ways."

      (London 1940).


      A funny co-incidence happened about 10 years ago that brought this story to mind when I moved back from A2 to Detroit. Our new phone number ended in 1729. Of course my GF complained that it would be hard to remember since it was such an un-interesting phone number!

    8. Re:Obilgatory story by mamba-mamba · · Score: 0, Redundant

      How to prove any theroem:

      1) If a proof exists, then the thereom is true.

      2) A proof exists (you're reading it), therefore the thereom must be true.

      QED.

      MM

      --
      By including this sig, the copyright holders of this work or collection unreservedly place it in the public domain.
    9. Re:Obilgatory story by nyri · · Score: 2, Interesting

      When J. E. Littlewood heard about the taxi incident he commented: "Every positive integer is one of Ramanujan's personal friends."

    10. Re:Obilgatory story by caluml · · Score: 1

      Hang on - what's the score with that equation? If it was Avogadro's constant divided by Pi was the speed of light, or something, that would be cool. But $RANDOM^$RANDOM * $RANDOM = $RANDOM^$RANDOM isn't that amazing.

    11. Re:Obilgatory story by bedessen · · Score: 1

      The numbers themselves are irrelevent, the interesting part is the fact that 1729 is the smallest number expressible in such a way and that Ramanujan knew this instantly.

  22. Incest? by rbarreira · · Score: 0, Troll

    His mother became his wife? Or his cook became his wife?

    --

    The AACS key is NOT 0xF606EEFD628B1CA427BEA93A9CA9773F
    1. Re:Incest? by Cerv · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Or his mother cooked for him, and later his wife cooked for him.

      --
      sig
    2. Re:Incest? by rbarreira · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      And maybe you have no sense of humour, or maybe you were already asking for this reply :)

      --

      The AACS key is NOT 0xF606EEFD628B1CA427BEA93A9CA9773F
  23. Pakistan not nurturing at all. by AtariAmarok · · Score: 3, Informative
    "I think Pakistan is seen as a much more attractive venue for logistical and scientific work."

    Not really. It only works if you are Muslim and male there. Pakistan actually has laws which include rape as a punishment for women, and the system also encourages killing of non-Muslims by specifically (in the code of law) making the killing of a non-Muslim a minor crime compared to the killing of a Muslim. I can provide links to both horrific laws if you want. That is not very intellectual or nurturing. Islam has absolutely no place in law, and any country that governs by Islamic law is declaring a war on those who don't worship the Muslim god. That is rather anti-intellectual. The same goes, of course, for any government that forces any religion on its people, including Christianity.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    1. Re:Pakistan not nurturing at all. by StateOfTheUnion · · Score: 1
      As long as we're comparing India and Pakistan, we should also note that India is no bed of reoses either. The recent success of India benefits a very small privledged minority . . . India is a country that:

      1. Has a government that burns surplus food bought by government subsidies rather than distribute it to the poor because subsidy laws make it illegal for the government to redistribute food below minimum set controlled prices. 2. Legally forces people to work to pay off the debts accrued by previous generations. The wages are so low that this amounts to legalized slavery that at current rates of interest and income will last in perpetuity.

    2. Re:Pakistan not nurturing at all. by ovit · · Score: 1

      Bravo. I'm glad someone isn't afraid to tell it like it is.

    3. Re:Pakistan not nurturing at all. by Trogre · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Agreed. Anyone who takes the time to study the Quaran in its fullness must conclude that Islam is evil to the core.

      Please note I said Islam, not Muslims. They are generally decieved by promises of peace from the false god Allah. This is not a licence for genocide or racial discrimination.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    4. Re:Pakistan not nurturing at all. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      hello and welcome to the great art of troll baiting...

      U have been Owned.

    5. Re:Pakistan not nurturing at all. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a complete joke of a post, rape as a punishment? What are you waffling about? Are you so blind that you believe everything you hear on TV?

      Obviously, there is a war going on with the Muslims right now, obviously, negative propaganda about them will be encouraged.

      I remember studying British Propaganda about the Germans in World War 2 - "Germans Eat Babies" this was in the newspapers, to scare people! Not to mention the fake Iraqis overturning incubators scam that was propagated by the US embassy.

    6. Re:Pakistan not nurturing at all. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm, this is slashdot, so yes please do link to those Pakistani laws. Nationalist and religionist propagandists aside, those are some very specific data points that need to be known. Pakistan's minority groups are in a situation very similar to Sudan's, and it is not publicized enough.

      Non-geeks often have a hangup about "offensive" statements, as though they were somehow categorically wrong. But please, everything deserves to be talked about, religious taboos notwithstanding. The fact that certain groups issue fatwas and death threats does not [yet] mean we bend over for them here on the net. Taboos have no place in the modern or scientific mindset.

      For example, a recent link quoted a televangelist calling Mohammed a pedophile. Emotional term, sure. But the history is, Mohammed's favorite wife in his older years [and he did already have lots of others] was about 12 when he married her. Now in any English dictionary, compare the word pedophilia.

      On news sources like NPR, you occasionally hear reference to some big boiling controversy about whether the Bible or the Koran says something. And they leave it at that, reporting the existence of the controversy as though that were the end of the story. I have NEVER heard them take the simple journalistic step of mentioning the damn verse, so that listeners could decide for themselves what it says. YTF not?

      I mention it here because geeks don't usually have a problem with discussing these things. Politicos and religiosos do.

  24. You'd have had more street cred ... by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... if you'd posted anonymously.

  25. Slashdot rules... by rbarreira · · Score: 1

    After just having seen a science guy, now we have an indian maths guy... Priceless :)

    --

    The AACS key is NOT 0xF606EEFD628B1CA427BEA93A9CA9773F
  26. Mathematicians ALWAYS say that by DrCode · · Score: 1

    When I was a PhD math student, I often annoyed professors by asking them about real-world applications, and usually got vague answers like the one quoted.

    Now, instead of becoming a math professor, I've been writing software for 20+ years, and about the only math I've found useful is of the "0xa + 6 = 0x10" variety. (And yes, I know that some math is useful.)

    1. Re:Mathematicians ALWAYS say that by iowannaski · · Score: 1

      How does someone who doesn't like math end up as a PhD math student?

      --
      i forget
    2. Re:Mathematicians ALWAYS say that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably the chick with the huge... eyes... who always sat next to him in class.

    3. Re:Mathematicians ALWAYS say that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The same way people who don't like electronics become electrical engineers. They pay a university to babysit them for a few years, and they get a piece of paper in exchange.


      At least Dr. Code has the integrity to speak the truth. I'm always amazed at the piles of kids that go into EE that never opened a CD player, own a soldering iron or have a home lab.


      It's the cult of university, and the cult of asking for bachelor's degrees for clerical jobs that creates the "someone who doesn't like math end up as a PhD math student".

    4. Re:Mathematicians ALWAYS say that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Note he didn't say he had a PhD.. but that he was a 'PhD math student'.. for all we know, he was still in high school, but with lofty expectations.

    5. Re:Mathematicians ALWAYS say that by xoboots · · Score: 1

      "How does someone who doesn't like math end up as a PhD math student?"

      He didn't say he didn't like math. He said he got annoyed when his professors couldn't point to real world uses for the math he was learning.

    6. Re:Mathematicians ALWAYS say that by spuzzzzzzz · · Score: 1, Insightful

      So why do a PhD in maths? If he wants to study applications, he should be doing a PhD in an applied subject. If he wants to study applications of mathematics, maybe he should be doing Physics or CompSci or something.

      Maths at a PhD level is very pure. Anyone wanting applications probably shouldn't be doing it.

      --

      Don't you hate meta-sigs?
    7. Re:Mathematicians ALWAYS say that by xoboots · · Score: 1

      Actually, I had it wrong after all. He actually wrote: "I often annoyed professors by asking them about real-world applications..."

      So he didn't actually ever say anything annoyed him about math--he just noted that he's was a wise-ass. Never-the-less, he neither said he actually completed his PhD, so perhaps in the end he came to the same conclusion that you did. Ha, a rather intuitive induction on your part considering the lack of provided facts.

    8. Re:Mathematicians ALWAYS say that by DrCode · · Score: 1

      Actually, I do like math and I did get my PhD in it. But I realized that I wasn't going to be a great researcher, and that writing software was a lot more fun (and a lot more lucrative).

    9. Re:Mathematicians ALWAYS say that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the only math I've found useful is

      You do realize that this means there are some programs you will simply never be able to write.

      I've been writing software for 30 years and I use way more maths than 10 + 6 = 16, on a daily basis. But I guess I'm doing more *ahem* complex things.

      You don't need much math to write a Perl script, but a compiler, now that's a different matter.

  27. done it true USian style.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..I mean, for example, only Americans would have subtitles for the Queen of England.

    You know in other countries we can even pronounce some Indian names ... well those on the cricket team at least ;-)

  28. How incredibly sad by palki · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... that Ramanujan gets referred to on slashdot as the "Indian math guy" and is followed by jokes on outsourcing. You can read about him at http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/biography/Ramanuja n.html or read the book "The Man who knew infinity" by Robert Kanigel. He had remarkable contributions in number theory, all made with very little formal training. His story cannot be explained in any other way but supreme in-born genius (he himself explained it by inspiration from the goddess Namagiri). The attitude to math in the general populace is one of total avoidance. I had hopes that the average slashdotter was different.

  29. Ramanujan was one of the greats of mathematics. by Schwarzchild · · Score: 4, Informative
    Did you know that when Doug Lenat was working on his Ph.D he developed AM (Automated Mathematician) which re-discovered one of Ramanujan's many discoveries.

    I believe that the American Mathematical Society wrote up a nice review of his lost or last notebook a few years ago.

    --

    "sweet dreams are made of this..."

  30. what does this mean? by stackdump · · Score: 1

    "patterns apply to primes" Does this mean to generate a/any prime number you can use a formula? If so does that mean it's easier to factor numbers?

    1. Re:what does this mean? by knightri · · Score: 1

      they already have formulas for primes, but above about 12 digits, the accuracy is not guranteed

      --
      'Or else pizza is going to order out for you'
    2. Re:what does this mean? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't mean either. A prime number formula exists, but it involves knowing all the zeros of the Riemann zeta function and not partitions. There is also no way to factor large integers this way. I think this new theorem says that every prime is the number of partitions of some integer, but this says nothing about the prime factors of an integer. One is a problem in additive number theory, while the other is a problem in multiplicative number theory.

  31. Re:so the world by Skadet · · Score: 0

    You're right. Sorry to disturb you. Go ahead and go back to watching your professional wrestling TV show. Those guys are something, aren't they?

    You're so cute when you're pious.

    I'd be more inclined to care if there were some sort of useful application mentioned in TFA. I'm the first to applaud knowledge for knowledge's sake, but I wonder what useful thing could have been accomplished in those man-hours.

    Or hey, if I'm missing the boat, just say so. No need to get all Kelsey Grammer on me.

    Dick.

  32. Srinivasa Ramanujan is his name, okay! by glowimperial · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Was it that hard to spell Srinivasa Ramanujan or what? Or because he's an Indian, his identity is unimportant? He's just one of a billion Godless Hindus? The presentation of this article stinks of bigotry. Srinivasa Ramanujan is well known to the many math geeks that visit this site every day, such as myself. Don't insult his important contributions and legacy in the world of mathematics by stripping him of his name and making him some "anonymous Indian genuis".

  33. I don't have a bias against Muslims. by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1, Flamebait
    I don't have a bias against Muslims. I do, however, have a bias against any government that forces religion. Religion is a personal choice, to decide or ignore if you want. It is not something to be forced by the government. I have a "bias" against any forced religion. It happens that Pakistan's law forces Islam upon citizens, so Islam is relevant here in this thread.

    So, do you think that opposition to forced Islam means opposition to Islam in general? Then there is the unjustified aggression and occupation by Pakistan against Kashmir. Kashmir never threatened or attacked Pakistan.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    1. Re:I don't have a bias against Muslims. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't have a bias against Muslims.
      Then there is the unjustified aggression and occupation by Pakistan against Kashmir. Kashmir never threatened or attacked Pakistan.

      And so, you affirm your bias against Pakistan. Your irrationality renders all your misconceptions mute. I would debate you on Kashmir, but it is futile since you a tool of the propaganda fed by your "democratic" government.

      You claim you do not like religion forcing government. Do you love atheist China? Do you like Catholic Ireland? Do you despise the Christian US? You accept those, because they have money that ends up in the Indian economy. You are a short-sighted money-hungry small being.

    2. Re:I don't have a bias against Muslims. by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1, Offtopic
      "I would debate you on Kashmir...but it is futile since you a tool of the propaganda fed..."

      Your definition of "propaganda" means information that you do not like. You are wrong, anyway. I do not recall my government ever saying anything on it. Regardless, the fact of the matter is that there is no justification for Pakistan's war against and imperialist claims against Kashmir.

      I supposed such arguments from your side would contain "might makes right" and Pakistan's necessary imperial ambition.

      "You claim you do not like religion forcing government.

      I did, and I said ALL religions. I even mentioned Christianity before you did. The topic was Pakistan, so Pakistan was discussed.

      --
      Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    3. Re:I don't have a bias against Muslims. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your definition of "propaganda" means information that you do not like. You are wrong, anyway. I do not recall my government ever saying anything on it. Regardless, the fact of the matter is that there is no justification for Pakistan's war against and imperialist claims against Kashmir.

      That is your opinion and you are entitled to it, even if it's been distorted by years of dogma and unquestioning acceptance of lies fed to you by various sources (government, media, textbooks and ignorant community members).

      The vast majority of the people of Indian-administered Kashmir welcome Pakistani rule where they will thrive and not be in fear of constant repercusions by the Indian military. They live in a state of occupation. It's sad state to be in.

      Then again, your blinding hatred of anything Pakistani will not allow any rational thought in your brain.

      I did, and I said ALL religions. I even mentioned Christianity before you did. The topic was Pakistan, so Pakistan was discussed.

      The items you omit speak volumes. Again, it shows that morals are weak. You despise religion-controlled governments but yet accept them willingly because ultimately financial gain is more important.

      No wonder the US sees Pakistan as a valued ally.

    4. Re:I don't have a bias against Muslims. by spectecjr · · Score: 1

      *gets bag of popcorn*

      Hey guys, while you're getting ready to nuke each other, would you mind nuking this? Just stop when the popping goes down to 1 every 3 seocnds or so.

      Thanksmuch.

      (years and years of fighting on both sides means that no one will win... I'm still amazingly surprised that the Northern Ireland peace process is still going forward to be honest)

      --
      Coming soon - pyrogyra
    5. Re:I don't have a bias against Muslims. by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1, Offtopic
      "The items you omit speak volumes"

      Eh? I ommitted them because we were talking about Pakistan, not every other country on the face of the earth. Yes, I do despise all religion controlled governments. Turkey, at least in this respect, is an example that should be emulated. It seems that you are attempting to divert the subject. Answer this: do you think that having Islam forced on the people through government law is a good thing? Or not? Answer this without irrelevant "but Slobovians are forced to be Zoroastrian Scientologists 900 miles away!" red herrings.

      "The items you omit speak volumes. Again, it shows that morals are weak. You despise religion-controlled governments but yet accept them willingly because ultimately financial gain is more important."

      "That is your opinion and you are entitled to it, even if it's been distorted by years of dogma"

      No, the statements about Pakistan are fact, and not mere opinion. Years of dogma? Hahaha. You think that the United States has a vast propaganda machine brainwashing people about Pakistan and Kashmir. (Did you hear? Ted Turner is really a Hindu, and he airs 8 hours a day of pro-India propaganda on CNN!)

      "They live in a state of occupation. It's sad state to be in."

      Yes, by the terrorist invaders from Pakistan. At least before the invasion, they had relative freedom of religion. Now they are forced by terrorists warlords to bow down before the Muslim god. The Pakistani occupation of Kashmir can not even begin to approach legitimacy unless it becomes entirely secular.

      "willingly because ultimately financial gain is more important"

      You are the one arguing financial matters. Feel free to argue with yourself. You care, I do not. To me, it matters less than a lot of things, such as basic decisions of conscience. Religion is one of these.

      Back to the topic, you said that Pakistan is a place of intellectual freedom. How can this be when Pakistan does not have freedom of the press? Here is something from Article 19 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan: "'Every citizen shall have the right to freedom of speech and expression, and there shall be Freedom of the Press, subject to any reasonable restrictions imposed by law in the interest of the glory of Islam". Intellectual strength is gone from a place that will not let you criticize Islam like anything else. Not to mention that Pakistan is officially an "Islamic Republic": that's intellectual suicide right there.

      If you want to argue off-topic stuff like atheists in China, post a link to your Slashdot journal or blog. I'll be happy to meet you there.

      I don't have a bias against Muslims. In the eyes of the law, Muslims and Islam should be treated exactly the same as everything nonMuslim and nonIslamic.

      --
      Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    6. Re:I don't have a bias against Muslims. by ek-1000-ek · · Score: 0

      Let us debate Kashmir. Does it occur to you, that _you_ could also be victim of propaganda! Let us cleanup each others "prejudices"

      --
      where did my sig go? where's my sig at?
  34. Russell by kaalamaadan · · Score: 5, Informative

    The coolest reference on Hardy's reaction to Ramanujan's initial letter is seen in a letter that was sent by Bertrand Russell to an acquaintance. It goes something like:

    "Saw Littlewood and Hardy in a considerable state of excitement. They claim to have discovered a second Newton, a Hindu clerk working in Madras for 20 pounds a year...It's all secret now, of course. I feel excited to know this"

    From: Ramanujan: Letters and Commenary

    Bruce C. Berndt and Robert L. Rankin.

    American Mathematical Society-London Mathematical Society.

  35. You have good points. by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1

    The influence of socialism is a problem in India, which means that is government is too strong at the expense of the governed. Controlled prices for things are always bad news.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    1. Re:You have good points. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Has a government that burns surplus food bought by government subsidies rather than distribute it to the poor because subsidy laws make it illegal for the government to redistribute food below minimum set controlled prices.

      The influence of socialism is a problem in India...


      Er, I don't see much socialism in the problem you are responding to. Minimum prices below which it's illegal to sell food sound to me like corporate protectionism of the sort you get in imperfect capitalist states like the USA. Socialism typically encourages governments to distribute the stuff they buy with all the taxes they collect...

    2. Re:You have good points. by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1
      "Socialism typically encourages governments to distribute the..."

      Socialism encourages the ruling elites to amass power and goods, and to make decisions (such as those mentioned) which serve the interests of the ruling class and not the people as a whole. Yes, it is corporate protectionism, but in socialism, the corporation being protected is the government itself.

      Also, "controlling prices" (instead of letting them reach their actual value on the market) has been a hallmark of socialism. The more extreme version of this is Stalin's "5 Year Plans" in which the price and amount of everything was dictated by the socialist government.

      --
      Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    3. Re:You have good points. by dustmote · · Score: 1

      Well, that was technically an attempt at communism, not socialism. *Limited* socialism seems to work well in some of the northern European nations, although you're right in pointing out the dangers of letting control over too much of the complex systems that govern our lives fall into the hands of a small group.

      --


      -1, "1337" speak
    4. Re:You have good points. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The influence of socialism is a problem in India

      Thats the most bogus claim I have seen. India is a feudal country, not a socialist country. The country does not have minimum wage worth its name (a socialist concept that no 1st world capitalist country would dare to challenge inside its own boundaries). Also, taking money from poor landless farmers and giving it to rich landlord-controlled cartels is the last thing that socialism stands for. In practice, India is yet to have land reforms for decades leading to tens of millions of landless farmers who are virtual slaves at the mercy of a handful of filthy rich landlords (which are income-tax exempt anyway) who in turn force/lobby with the government (a bunch of criminals anyway) to keep grain prices artificially high. So much so that the grain producers (the landless farmers) can't afford to buy them and end up dying of starvation. That sounds exactly like tax-cuts for the rich and squeeze-the-poor kind of politics that is anything but socialism.

      Controlled prices for things are always bad news.

      Yes they are, particularly when thats what the vested interest-controlled government does to benefit a few rich folks. Take for example, the ban on purchasing cheaper prescriptions drugs from Canada. Now thats everything but socialism.

      Ok, may be that is "socialism for capitalists" camouflaged as "corporate welfare".

    5. Re:You have good points. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Socialism encourages the ruling elites to amass power and goods, and to make decisions (such as those mentioned) which serve the interests of the ruling class and not the people as a whole.

      Thats capitalism, not socialism. Don't start redefining words. Tell me that by your definition, most corporate-controlled capitalist countries are not "socialist". For example, the washington state govt will do anything (including giving huge tax cuts to the tune of $64 billion http://www.seattleweekly.com/features/0439/040929_ news_microsoft.php ) just to keep MS (and its like) in town.

      Yes, it is corporate protectionism, but in socialism, the corporation being protected is the government itself.

      While that may be true, in the Indian context, its the cartel of rich landlords who are being protected while the lives of millions of landless farmers are being destroyed because the artificially high price of food grains is too high for them to buy.

    6. Re:You have good points. by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1
      "Thats capitalism, not socialism. Don't start redefining words"

      I'm not. This is exactly what socialism ends up doing: encouraging the limitless power of the ruling class over the ruled. It is the proven way for the powerful to gain the most power, which is why the overwhelming majority of the worst dictators in the post Marx period (Mao, Lenin, Pol Pot, etc) are all socialists.

      "the washington state govt will do anything (including giving huge tax cuts to the... "

      How is letting someone keep the money they created and earned a "gift" ?

      --
      Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    7. Re:You have good points. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is exactly what capitalism ends up doing: encouraging the limitless power of the ruling class over the ruled. It is the proven way for the powerful to gain the most power, which is why the overwhelming majority of the worst rober barons are all capitalists.

  36. Timothy is racist by Hao+Wu · · Score: 0, Troll

    How would you like those to call you "the white editor of Slashdot"? You do not like Indian people, I believe.

    --
    I suggest you read Slashdot
    1. Re:Timothy is racist by ovit · · Score: 2, Funny

      Not necessarily. He might just be an idiot.

    2. Re:Timothy is racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      is that like black debby and black stormy?

      besides it would be more apropriat if you wrote "some white slashdot editor"

  37. Ramanujan's strict vegan diet killed him. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    One of the greatest minds in history succumbed to a vitamin deficiency brought about by not eating meat or any other animal products.

    Think about it, you anorexic hippies.

    1. Re:Ramanujan's strict vegan diet killed him. by smithtodda · · Score: 1

      State your source.

      --
      Why Vegan? No other food choice has a farther-reaching and more profoundly positive impact on all of life on Earth.
    2. Re:Ramanujan's strict vegan diet killed him. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a well known fact that his vegetarian diet contributed to his death.

      But not because a vegetarian diet is unhealthy, but because vegetarian food was scarce in England during WWI. Stress, diet, and probably disease all contributed to kill him.

      It would be better to conclude that a strict and inflexible diet killed him.

    3. Re:Ramanujan's strict vegan diet killed him. by arnott · · Score: 1

      Ramanujan's caste(clan) treated him as an outcast for traveling abroad. that contributed to his death.

      from wolfram :
      Unfortunately, Ramanujan's health deteriorated rapidly in England, due perhaps to the unfamiliar climate, food, and to the isolation which Ramanujan felt as the sole Indian in a culture which was largely foreign to him. Ramanujan was sent home to recuperate in 1919, but tragically died the next year at the very young age of 32.

    4. Re:Ramanujan's strict vegan diet killed him. by hyperventilate · · Score: 1

      Muhutma Ghandi described his experience about the same time in England, from a similar Hindu culture.
      Ghandi nearly starved in England.

      England at that time wasn't blessed with good Indian resturants on every block.

      The supply of fruits and veggies at that time was pathetic, particularly in winter.

      Attempting to be vegetarian in such an environment is dangerous. But wait- there's more.

      The English diet depends heavily on milk, and most Indians cannot drink fresh milk. That is why, in Indian cooking the milk is always served as yogurt, clarified butter, cheese or ice-cream.
      Ghandi had terrible stomach pain when he tried.

      Just learning to deal with the stomach pain doesn't help- a person without the lactase enzyme cannot gain nutrition by trying to drink milk.

      TB rarely kills a healthy person, but with a poor diet or weak immune system (AIDS) it is lethal.

    5. Re:Ramanujan's strict vegan diet killed him. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean Mahatma, not Muhutma; and his real first name is Mohandas. Mahatma means "Great" or "One with a great soul"

      Where are you getting your info about Indians not drinking fresh milk? Every Indian I know drinks milk. Native Americans are the ones who are often lactose intolerant.

  38. Re:How incredibly sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Alright, we've already been through half a dozen of these mini lectures and I don't think the original poster was intentionally disrespectful, just a bit too casual maybe. He didn't realize that many people here already knew who Ramanujan was. Time to lighten up.

  39. Numbers were there before the big bang by arrowman · · Score: 5, Funny

    "how numbers can be created by adding other numbers"... that sounds more like the observation of an American presidency guy.

    1. Re:Numbers were there before the big bang by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn! Where are my +1 Funny mod points when I need them...

      Seriously

      :)

  40. Ignorant Math Guy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Timothy must be pretty ignorant about 20th century mathematics to call Ramanujan the Indian math guy. Like calling Gauss, the German math guy or Fermat, the French math guy. Those of us who who live, breathe and love mathematics are appalled and offended.

  41. Or for all those that aren't interested in math... by Kjella · · Score: 1, Interesting

    While this allows one to calculate p(n) recursively, it doesn't lead to an explicit formula. Hardy and Ramanujan came up with such a formula (though they only proved it works asymptotically; Rademacher proved it gives the exact value of p(n)).

    The value was already known exactly. There was already a formula which could calculate it easily, and it had solid theoretical and empirical indications it was correct. Now we have a stringent proof. Big whoop.

    Not to undermine its importance *in mathematics*. But I think we can safely say the world won't exactly change over this proof.

    Kjella

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  42. Re:How incredibly sad by griffm · · Score: 2, Informative

    I was going to mention the Robert Kanigel book as well. It's a great book. You've beaten me to the punch.

  43. Now you tell us. by Whyte+Panther · · Score: 2, Funny

    Does this mean I've been wasting my CPU cycles?

  44. Math is hard! by xsfo · · Score: 0

    Math is hard!

  45. Re:Cannabilism by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 0

    I think they refer to the cooking of one's wife (or widow, actually) as sati.

    In many South East Asian cultures that were influenced by India, such as Malaysia, Indonesia and Thailand, it referred to as satay. (In case you were wondering what it is you're really ordering at that Thai restaurant.)

    --
    It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
  46. Re:so the world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    let me think for a sec. finding patterns in prime numbers. prime numbers are the basic building block of encryption. while it may not affect encryption today (i don't really know) it might be extended to uncover patterns in prime numbers that allows one to throw away large areas of the key space.

  47. The indian math guy? by Bionic_Baboon · · Score: 1

    Has the science guy's job been outsourced?

  48. Mystery Illness? by LokieLizzy · · Score: 5, Informative
    "England in 1914 and worked there until shortly before his untimely death in 1920 following a mystery illness."

    He didn't die from a "mystery illness", he died from tuberculosis (or as it was called back then, the consumption).

    --
    My digital rights don't need management.
    1. Re:Mystery Illness? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually there is some argument as to what he died from. It may have been from a parasitic liver infection. Also he died in India after he returned in 1919, not in England.

    2. Re:Mystery Illness? by Anonymous+Matt · · Score: 1

      When you see phrases like "mystery illness", "mysterious causes" or "under mysterious circumstances" it always, always, always means someone from the future has been tampering with the timeline. When I say always I mean most of the time, because sometimes mystery simply indicates lack of knowledge. In this case, however, I suspect interference from the 29th century. People from then will have been such nefarious meddlers!

  49. In other news... by BigBadDude · · Score: 5, Funny

    "A decade ago, a self-taught computer genius from Finland [...] There's more on the Finish computer guy here."

    (I think you get the point)

  50. The really annoying part. by AltGrendel · · Score: 0

    His name is in the first sentence.

    --
    The simple truth is that interstellar distances will not fit into the human imagination

    - Douglas Adams

    1. Re:The really annoying part. by Darby · · Score: 5, Informative

      His name is in the first sentence.

      I just moused over, and it's in the freaking URL.

    2. Re:The really annoying part. by Infinityis · · Score: 1

      In case you're wondering, the parent post was modded insightful because now people don't actually have to click on the link and risk RTFA.

    3. Re:The really annoying part. by Darby · · Score: 1

      In case you're wondering, the parent post was modded insightful because now people don't actually have to click on the link and risk RTFA.

      Now that is pure genious.

      Now, I did get my BS in math, read The Man Who Knew Infinity, and so know who he was, but regardless.

      That was great.

  51. so does this result have any bearing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    on the Goldbach Conjecture or Twin Primes hypothesis?

  52. Indian Math Guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This site is full of crock and biggots lately, especially coders lacking skills complaining about outsourcing, yet probably own a sony tv and a honda.

  53. Re:India is a pseudo-democracy. by ameoba · · Score: 1

    Bias or no, it's pretty hard to talk about a country being modern & civilized when the penalties for murder vary based on the religion of the victim.

    Because your neighbor molests his children does not make it OK for you to 'merely' beat them.

    --
    my sig's at the bottom of the page.
  54. No. You are. by realitybath1 · · Score: 0

    Going from the words he used in the summary,your example should have been:

    "the American editor of Slashdot". (or whatever nation he is from)

    Also, 'Genius' is not often considered a racial slur.

  55. Maybe he was joking by TiKwanLeep · · Score: 1

    Perhaps submitter-man was joking about indian-math-guy? Maybe it was an algebraic joke gone haywire? Ok, im reaching here but cut submitter-man a break, its tuesday. (dead-indian-guy doesnt care...)

  56. Re:Counterpoint by melkorainur · · Score: 1
    > I think Pakistan is seen as a much more attractive venue for logistical and scientific work.

    Are you trolling?

    If you are serious, could you provide some numbers, or facts that might substantiate your statement? Something that I could actually look at to compare between Pakistan and India. And while we're at it, let's add China to the comparison list. Let's restrict the data to things like number of scientists, amount of published research from both countries, things of that nature. Let's avoid listing "subjective points/opinions" that are not directly related such as politics, or social structure.

  57. Re:India is a pseudo-democracy. by kaalamaadan · · Score: 2, Informative
    Are you talking about the non-uniform civil code?

    Only the civil code is non-uniform. This deals with marriage, divorce and inheritance, for instance.

    A murder is a criminal case, and it is uniformly treated in the Indian Penal Code, irrespective of the usual divisions.

  58. Buy my product today! by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 1, Troll
    This is a disaster for computer security. It means that all forms of cryptography, which governments, banking systems, businesses, and individuals use to protect online communications, persistent data, and various form of digital assets, will immediately become obsolete, as crackers will now have the ability, using the proof to this theorem, to crack any form of encryption within a matter of seconds, rather than centuries.

    However, if you buy Lightning Shadow Software's new product, Vault Protector Pro Gold Platinum Edition, your data will be protected under uncrackable encryption and it will be 100% safe. Simply send an envelope stuffed with cash to my P.O. box address, which I will post here tomorrow, after I file the papers to form Lightning Shadow Software.

  59. The Alamo by ishmalius · · Score: 1

    I had a friend from New York refer to the Alamo as "that church thing." How does anyone get through school without hearing about Ramanujan?

    1. Re:The Alamo by geoffspear · · Score: 1

      That's odd. Most normal people refer to it as "that proof that Texans are a bunch of idiots who can't find anything better to celebrate than getting their asses whupped by a bunch of Mexicans."

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
  60. Desperately seeking kelp by Zoinks · · Score: 2, Funny

    I would like to encrypt my credit card information for sending it over the Internet. Can someone *please* help me use this article to do that? I mean, where do I plug in the credit card number? Does it matter that mine doesn't end in "4" or "9"? Do I need the CCV?

    1. Re:Desperately seeking kelp by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      You'll be OK if it ends in an 11.

      For that matter, thanks to this guy, you'll be OK if it's prime, too.

  61. Re:Cannabilism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sew sari.

  62. It's always the grad students by Patrick+Mannion · · Score: 1

    It's always them. They always solve this stuff in college. They get famous...then drift off into obsucurity. Like the Indian guy. And, I hate math.

    --
    In America, you spam computers In Soviet Russia, computers spam you!
  63. We need more Indian math geniuses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Seriously, the dude at 7-11 totally fucked up my change last time I bought a Slurpee.

  64. Srinivasa Ramanujan and G. H. Hardy by Bozzio · · Score: 1

    In some ways the two made an odd pair

    Not only were Ramanujan and Hardy an odd pair, but they were also a genious comedy duo!

    --
    I just pooped your party.
    1. Re:Srinivasa Ramanujan and G. H. Hardy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So I mispelled "genius". That doesn't mean I'm dumn.

    2. Re:Srinivasa Ramanujan and G. H. Hardy by slide-rule · · Score: 1

      Not only were Ramanujan and Hardy an odd pair, but they were also a genious comedy duo!

      Well that's just great... this is another fine troll^W mess you've gotten us all into. ;-)

  65. outsourcing? was: Re:Srinivasa Ramanujan? by SeventyBang · · Score: 0

    It hasn't been that long ago since outsourcing meant "someone not on the staff"; i.e. a "software whore" aka a contractor.

    1. Re:outsourcing? was: Re:Srinivasa Ramanujan? by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 0, Troll

      and remember when an oversea-er held a whip and bossed us around?

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    2. Re:outsourcing? was: Re:Srinivasa Ramanujan? by Krakhan · · Score: 1

      Hmm? I was just commenting on the extremely vague description of the article in agreement with the parent.

      It had nothing to do with the fact that Ramanujan was indian or anything like that.

  66. Some Guy? by Eureka!Branch · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Thanks for marginalizing some Indian guy, who just happened to be a self-taught genius. I guess if he went to a fancy Ivy Leauge school. . . whoops he never got the oppurtunity, instead like many other geniuses whose work the entire field of Western thought is based on, he made do with what he had; his enviromental circumstances, his intellect and his curiosity about the world and how it worked. However, we woulded think to refer to Hubble or Newton or Plato or Tesla as some guy. These innovators and other current thinkers and scientists, unknown to the general public, when invoked for an article usually get refered to by there names as a sign of respect for their accomplishments. This, after all, was not some guy that appeared on America's Funniest Home Videos after cracking his testicles in a backyard wrestling stunt gone awry (as if they could go anyother way). This was Srinivasa Ramanujan, who added to the scope of human thought, through a great deal of effort and unselfish use of his talents. I am happy to see that other people are also concerned with this charaterization of a respected and accomplished individual in the field of mathamatics. I'm sure this was an unintentional oversight and that the author was in some way recognizing that this was interesting development, but it was still a thoughtless marginalization of Srinivasa Ramanujan, who I'm sure not only serves as an inspiration for many people of Indian ethnicity or to students of mathamatics, but to people of varied ethnic and social backgrounds. I hope the author understands this is not about a tounge lashing just for the sake of pointing the finger and making him/her feel small. This is a reminder that we live in a society swollen with images and ideologies that diminish the accomplishments of some members of our culture in favor of the dominant paradigm (something I have been and will be guilty of playing into myself). To change this we need to chip away at these ideas by treating each person with the respect they are due and recognize when casual attitudes harm and continue to marginalize those persons because they fit outside of what we have been taught to regard as important or worthy of our attention. I would also like to say I love Slashdot! And appreciate it for championing and providing a forum for a large marginalized group that is rife with sterotypical associations, the so-called "nerd." Though nerd is often just another broad marginalizing label, Slashdot does a good job of showing the actual importance, varity of interests and accomplishments, and worth of this depricated group. (Sorry about the spelling errors. Not really my strong suit.)

    1. Re:Some Guy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yep, white guys suck
      all leeches on the minds of the true leets
      west is bad east is good
      no god awful one god bad 1000 gods good
      why the fuck does the fucking white guy marginalize everyone. hell, why the hell does the fucking gujarati white guy marginalize the madrasi
      fucking darkies living in their fucking marginalized world are gonna revolt and have you fucking white guys for dinner just like the fucking kanamits have been havng you for dinner for years because you were too stupid to read and couldn't even get the message from the video.

      your all fucking meat and gonna steam in a fucking CO2 global warming (which is your fucking fault by the way too) driven bamboo steamer of a planet ruined by the fucking white guys

      kill the white man
      eat his chilren

    2. Re:Some Guy? by Eureka!Branch · · Score: 0

      Hey, don't feel like you have to go out of your way to sound like an ass and prove my point at the same time. But I shouldn't impede your one contribution to society. Without people like you and some of the others that have commented so thoughtfully on this article there wouldn't be a benchmark for the rest of us to surpass. Thanks for setting that bar so low.

  67. wife? mother? by joako · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Ramanujan had always lived in a tropical climate and had his mother (later his wife) to cook for him: now he faced the English winter, and he had to do all his own cooking to adhere to his caste's strict dietary rules." Wow.. I really think they could have worded that better.

  68. Don't forget Pi... by pyrrhonist · · Score: 4, Informative

    The Pi symbol /. uses for Math articles is very appropriate in this case, because Ramanujan also came up with a formula for the numerical representation of Pi
    That's the first thing I thought of when I saw the article text, and I was kind of disappointed it wasn't about that particular aspect of Ramanujan.

    --
    Show me on the doll where his noodly appendage touched you.
    1. Re:Don't forget Pi... by wsloand · · Score: 1

      That's not the only formula he came up with. http://mathworld.wolfram.com/PiFormulas.html

      I thought I recalled an infinite fraction computation for pi by Ramanujan that was the most efficient, but I could be mis-remembering.

  69. Re:Don't kid yourself. by ChuckSchwab · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That's not the point. He is a person. He did something important. He has a name. He is NOT "the Indian math guy".

  70. Re:How incredibly sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...you must be new here.

  71. Re:Don't kid yourself. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Ramanujan was one of the greatest mathematical geniuses of the 20th century. there are some people on./ who could do with some basic education.

  72. Re:How incredibly sad by Rostin · · Score: 1

    I had hopes that the average slashdotter was different.

    This is definitely a trollish thing to say, but why? Consider what the majority of stories are about. The average /.er is probably involved in some kind of IT work requiring certification but not a degree of any kind. There's nothing wrong with that, of course. It's just not the most likely description of someone who has a genuine interest in mathematics.

  73. Re:Don't kid yourself. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, he's one above them, as he wasn't a sell out, or a publicity whore.

  74. Calling him "Indian" is racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I think he should be called a "Native American", or more specifically, his tribe, cherokee, apache, or iroquis.

    But Indian? Welcome to 1875, Mr. Racist.

    1. Re:Calling him "Indian" is racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can tell you're stupid. I just can't tell which *kind* of stupid.

    2. Re:Calling him "Indian" is racist by arkanoid · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      You really are an idiot. It's INDIAN as for India, you know, the country??? man, this really is a wonderful world for having people like you...

    3. Re:Calling him "Indian" is racist by rob_squared · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it does seem that trying to be politically correct has gone too far. Short people are vertically challenged, white people are rhythmically challenged, and slashdotters are socially challenged.

      --
      I don't get it.
    4. Re:Calling him "Indian" is racist by thesnarky1 · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's not "socially challenged", its "lonely and bored on a friday night

    5. Re:Calling him "Indian" is racist by dustinbarbour · · Score: 1

      Haha.. Trolling is great, isn't it? You all were just 0wn3d!

  75. Rationally, the US ranks higher than Pakistan. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you despise the Christian US?

    I like the Christian US much more than Islamic Pakistan. So much more, it's in a different category of human rights altogether. Not because I'm Christian, because I'm not. Not because I'm American, because I'm not.

    I like the Christian US more than Islamic Pakistan because despite the fact that US law is steeped in Chrstian bias, it does not treat the murder of an Athiest or Muslim or Sikh or Hindu or Buddhist as a lesser crime than the murder of a Christian. That specific fact alone is a rational basis for me to like the Christian US far more than Islamic Pakistan.

    This reasoning, of course, presumes that valuing all human lives equally is rational. You may or may not agree with that, and I accept that. But I've tried to explain my simple model of the world.

    1. Re:Rationally, the US ranks higher than Pakistan. by QMO · · Score: 1

      But, in the US not all murders are equal under the law.

      If someone from a protected minority group is killed it can be much more seriouis than a non-minority murder because of "hate-crime" laws.

      These laws basically say that the minority status of the victim and the personal beliefs of the murderer affect the seriousness of the crime.

      Years from now this will either have blossomed into more comprehensive thought-control laws, or be laughed at.

      --
      Exam 4/C again. Maybe I'll do better this time.
    2. Re:Rationally, the US ranks higher than Pakistan. by tuxedobob · · Score: 1

      Wow, you have some very subtle language there. Yes, it "can be" a hate crime, and it "can be" more serious, but it has to be determined that it was a hate crime.

      The distinction much more often made is whether a murder is first, second, or third degree.

  76. You forgot: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    25^3 + (-24)^3 = 15625 - 13896 = 1729

    1. Re:You forgot: by Bloomy · · Score: 2, Funny
      But 24^3 = 13824. Though 25^3 + (-24)^3 + (-4)^3 + (-2)^3 = 1729

      But if we use negative integers, 1729 gets trumped by 0, since x^3 + (-x)^3 = 0 for all integers.

  77. STFU & DON'T COMMENT UNTIL YOU'VE READ THE ART by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  78. Know your math department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    When I was a PhD math student, I often annoyed professors by asking them about real-world applications, and usually got vague answers like the one quoted.

    Well, then don't go to the Pure Math department when you're asking questions about Applied Math! Don't go to the C&O department, and ask about Statistics, and don't go the Actuary Science department, and ask about Accounting! Yes, they're all within the Math Faculty, but you have to pick your department correctly, or you won't get the answers you want! Sheesh! You wouldn't go to a French professor, and get all annoyed that they didn't speak ancient greek, would you? They're in the Arts Faculty, but Ancient Greek belongs to the Classical Studies department, and French belongs to Romance Languages department.

    There is a lot of mathematics out there with real world applications: modeling for physics and engineering, non-linear statistical methods for stock market analysis, all sorts of new crypographic methods and applications, graphical rendering engines; tons of stuff.

    Typically, pure math is far in advance of real-world applications: most of the mathematics we use today had no "real world" application when it was first concieved of. Field theory was considered "useless" when it was created, but it forms the heart of both modern cryptography, and of error correcting codes. These two, in turn, have become crucial to the success of our banking and telecommunications industries.

    New insights into eliptic curves are yielding a new form of cryptography; the discrete logarithm problem forms the basis of another. Ten years ago, quantum computing was a matter of purely speculative mathematics; today, it exists as an experimental science.

    Imaginary numbers were so named because no one figured they had real world uses: today, they're taught as a practical matter for electrical engineers to use in their electronics calculations. Taylor series approximations take the guesswork out of sin and cosine calculations, polynomial interpolation techniques allows computation of a "curve of best fit" for arbitrary scientific data, and every modern engineer is now aquainted with Fourier's transform. Some of Benoit Mandlebrot's notions about fractals were used to create JPEG compression, in common use on the Internet. Wavelet theory is currently being developed to attempt to improve on current methods.

    Math is pushing ahead very fast; the real reason you don't usually see it is because it's often right at the heart of things; deep inside our hashing algorithms, hidden in a cryptography library, working behind the scenes as the statistical underpinnings of a successful greylist design that keeps spam away. It's in the boolean algebras that were used to design an efficient circuit layout, and in the iterative methods used to compute a new airfoil design. It's everywhere.

    --
    AC

    1. Re:Know your math department by Silver+Solid+Brass · · Score: 1

      Wow, you just justified my college degree plan...

    2. Re:Know your math department by Perdo · · Score: 0, Troll

      "Imaginary numbers were so named because no one figured they had real world uses: today, they're taught as a practical matter for electrical engineers to use in their electronics calculations."

      That is very wrong.

      Gauss, (hmm.. where have I heard that name before) invented imaginagry numbers because in electricity, negative values are as real as positive values, and math regains symetry through imaginary numbers so that we can find the root of -1, a very real value in gee, magnetism perhaps?

      And about the name?

      Gauss was french, and while imaginary has stuck, the proper translation is image-less. While imaginary has connotations of being of the mind or made up, image-less means invisible, or directly as it was described, as having no image on the "real" number line.

      Better might be visible and invisible, instead of real and imaginary. Best is certainly Image-less, as it is a direct translation of what Gauss was referring to.

      --

      If voting were effective, it would be illegal by now.

    3. Re:Know your math department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
      Gauss, (hmm.. where have I heard that name before) invented imaginagry numbers

      Gauss did quite a lot of things in math, but inventing imaginary numbers was not one of them. These numbers were known long before him and their name was coined by Rene Descartes, as a quick glance at wikipedia would reveal. Incidentally, Descartes named the numbers imaginary exactly because he did not believe they could "exist."

      Gauss was french

      Gauss was one of the greatest german mathematicians, my friend.

    4. Re:Know your math department by Perdo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You are correct, I'm terrible with names.

      "The term was coined by René Descartes in 1637 in his La Géométrie and was meant to be derogatory: obviously, such numbers were thought not to exist."

      This statement does not give him enough credit.

      The word has been misstranslated.

      Imaginaire

      Of the mind, or

      Image-less
      Invisible
      Vision less

      He described them this way because they could not be plotted using his cartesian coordinate system, not because they obviously didn't exist. He used them, and new better that that.

      --

      If voting were effective, it would be illegal by now.

    5. Re:Know your math department by NoOneInParticular · · Score: 1

      What Gauss did do was prove was The Fundamental Theorem of Algebra, showing that there is no need for other numbers next to the real and imaginary.

    6. Re:Know your math department by pestario · · Score: 1

      a quick glance at wikipedia

      Please don't provide a link by that name when you are not really linking something about wikipedia. The problem occurs when someone is searching for articles posted by slashdot on wikipedia (google site:slashdot.org wikipedia). This set of posts would show up because it has a link named wikipedia and googlebot thinks, oh this converstation must be about wikipedia.

      This is what they call noise in the search results. It is, unfortunately, a widespread problem on the web.

      --
      :n
    7. Re:Know your math department by LoyalOpposition · · Score: 1
      Imaginary numbers were so named because no one figured they had real world uses

      No. Imaginary numbers were so named in contrast to the known numbers. If these numbers weren't "real," then they must be...

      --
      I aim to misbehave.
    8. Re:Know your math department by gwayne · · Score: 1

      But where does one begin in self-taught mathematics today? I like to dabble in everything, but it seems the field is expanding in so many directions it would be impossible to get exposure to all aspects.

      15 years ago, I was good at applied physics and calculus. 10 years ago I was still good at statistics. Today, my math skills are probably at a college algebra level.

      I have lots of math texts, but I don't really want to reread them all. What's the best exposure path for someone who would rather be a mathematician than corporate slave? I don't really trust the universities to have my best interests at heart.

    9. Re:Know your math department by sqlgeek · · Score: 1

      There have been three great, head and shoulders above the rest, mathematicians: Archimedes, Newton and Gauss. If you don't know who these men were and what they did, well, then you probably shouldn't be talking about mathematicians in a very knowing manner. Just saying.

    10. Re:Know your math department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gauss was one of the greatest german mathematicians, my friend.

      One of the travesties of moving from the mark to the euro was losing the artistry of the German mark. While I recognize the reason why German money avoided politicians and military leaders after WW2 so they had to put SOMEONE on their money, the choices of people recognized on their money impressed me greatly. I still carry a 10 Deutchmark bill with a picture of Gauss and his curve in my wallet.

    11. Re:Know your math department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      There have been three great, head and shoulders above the rest, mathematicians: Archimedes, Newton and Gauss.

      Oh really. What about Euklides, who was the first man ever to propose an axiom-based mathematical system ? Axiomatic theories became the foundation of mathematics a couple of thousand years later. What about Leibnitz, who discovered differential and integral calculus simultaneously with Newton ? What about Hilbert, who determined the direction of mathematics for the last hundred years ? (Really, think about it - almost all of the mathematics of the 20th century was about solving Hilbert's problems.) What about Cantor and his set theory, another fundamental notion of modern mathematics ?

      Archimedes, Newton and Gauss are great and deserve all the credit they are given. I am just not sure either of them is as great as Pythagoras ;-)

  79. Re:Disappointing by Derleth · · Score: 1
    specially for a guy who's probably brighter than 99% of anyone in ./, regardless of nationality.

    Especially those of us who think this place is called Dotslash. ;-)

    --
    How can you use my intestines as a gift? -Actual Hong Kong subtitle.
  80. Re:Don't kid yourself. by SeventyBang · · Score: 1, Interesting


    I suppose Evariste Galois was just some guy who flunked his entrance exams and was killed in a duel when he was 20? What would you have to say about Paul Erdos?

    (snicker)

    You're putting Linus in the same crowd as Einstein and claiming Ramanujan is "some grad student"?

    Keep'em coming. I needed a good laugh. We'll see how long it takes for my ribs to hurt. You have a long way to go to top the time in college when we crumbled Gaines Burger dog food and put it into the salad bar, but with some work and a good mentor, you too, might be funny.

    Wait, I almost forgot. Are you trolling?

    bwahahahahahahahahahahahaha

  81. Indian Math Guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's sad when on a website for geeks that one of the world's most remarkable mathematicians is referred to as that.

  82. Perfect time... by CaptainPinko · · Score: 1

    to plug my sig. Really, I can't fathom how people would choose primes over protiens when protiens may help the fight against cancer amongst others. Please follow the link at least and take a look.

    --
    Your CPU is not doing anything else, at least do something.
    1. Re:Perfect time... by gibson042 · · Score: 0
      Really, I can't fathom how people would choose primes over protiens when protiens may help the fight against cancer amongst others.
      I can't fathom why people would choose either primes or proteins over aliens when the latter may answer the question of our uniqueness in the universe and have profound implications in nearly all human endeavors. But then, I figure people can do what they want with their CPUs and try not to talk down to those who at least aren't using them to DOS-attack websites or send spam.
    2. Re:Perfect time... by Legion303 · · Score: 1

      "I can't fathom how people would choose primes over protiens"

      Because I'm a mathematician, not a biologist. Fuck proteins (note correct spelling).

    3. Re:Perfect time... by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 1

      Because it's a false distinction to say everyone must choose the same. Besides that it would stupid for everyone to just work one problem. While everyone's working on curing cancer et al folding at home we completly miss the aliens giving us 30 gooflack notice of intent to invade and the fact that there is a fatal flaw in current best/most popular encryption scheme used by banks and the statistical fluctuations that show our planet is gonna crash into the sun next year.
      Tunnel vision is bad m'kay.

      Mycroft

      --
      https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
  83. the mutherfucker has a name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i mean saying just a indian guy is lame. theres over 500million indian guys

  84. Re:Don't kid yourself. by Y0tsuya · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Excuse me for not being a Linus fanboy, but Linus is NOT in the same league as Einstein. I'm surprised they're mentioned in the same sentence. When Linus dies, nobody will be falling over themselves to dissect his brain.

  85. What implications does this have for cyptography? by chigby · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Any slashdot cyrpto gurus want to take a stab as to what implications this has for cryptogrphy and factoring large numbers?

  86. Does this remind anyone of Bill and Ted's? by syousef · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "All you've learned was that Ceasar was a salad dressing dude."

    and:

    "If I was a short French dude from the past where would I go?"

    --
    These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    1. Re:Does this remind anyone of Bill and Ted's? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That reminds me of "So crates"

    2. Re:Does this remind anyone of Bill and Ted's? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Germany, with both hands up."

      Not if he was that short French military guy!!!

      And, if he was that short French artist guy, he would head for a brothel!

    3. Re:Does this remind anyone of Bill and Ted's? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And, last but not least, my most excellent capadre: "Beeth-Oven".

    4. Re:Does this remind anyone of Bill and Ted's? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm tired of hearing jokes about the French surrendering to the first German they meet!! You know they guy doesn't have to be German!!

  87. Re:Disappointing by Lisandro · · Score: 1

    Awww shrucks! :)

  88. as long as we are there... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    we might as well point out that the bible is no better.

    1. Re:as long as we are there... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're joking, right?

      Read them both through some time. There is no comparison.

    2. Re:as long as we are there... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speaking of The Old Testament versus the Koran, they both get pretty evil in places.

      In the Old Testament, the Jews are instructed by their God to invade foreign lands, kill the men, rape the women and take them as their slaves. This God sounds like a political tyrant.

      God tests a man's obedience by telling him to kill his own son. How is a person to distinguish God from the Devil? Apparently the difference is only in power and not goodness.

      Additionally, being gay or sassing you parents is punishable by death.

      Have you even read the Bible?

  89. If only Ramanujan had lived longer by mincognito · · Score: 2, Funny

    But when your number's up...

    1. Re:If only Ramanujan had lived longer by roror · · Score: 1

      All good guys die young :( aint it sad. I know I am going to live for 100 years. :(

  90. Re:Don't kid yourself. by QMO · · Score: 2, Funny

    "I find your lack of faith disturbing."

    "Never underestimate the power of the [fans]."

    Elvis is a good example of the strange things people will do for a dead guy. (Except, he's not really dead, right?)

    --
    Exam 4/C again. Maybe I'll do better this time.
  91. Crypto is the biggest consumer of number theory by tepples · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Well, then don't go to the Pure Math department when you're asking questions about Applied Math!

    The question to pure mathies might have been phrased: "What have the Applied Math people done with your past discoveries in this sub-field?" In the case of number theory and other discrete fields of study (pardon the pun), discoveries have so often led to something or other regarding cryptography or cryptanalysis or both.

  92. Big eyes, small mouth by tepples · · Score: 1

    Probably the chick with the huge... eyes... who always sat next to him in class.

    Somebody's been watching too much anime.

  93. Re:Don't kid yourself. by frankie · · Score: 4, Insightful

    NOT in the same league as Einstein or Linus Torvalds

    Funny that your parochial flamebait happens to be true. Ramanujan was definitively smarter than either of them.

    Not to put down Big Al, but he only had a small armful of memorable discoveries spread over the decades of his career. OTOH, Ramanujan pumped out astonishingly brilliant stuff pretty much every day of his sadly brief adult life.

  94. yeah. by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1
    "Ramanujan had always lived in a tropical climate and ....cooking ...etc" Wow.. I really think they could have worded that better.

    Yeah. I was waiting for the part where the tigers turned into butter.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  95. Apocryphal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hardy's story is most probably apocryphal - Ramanujam could not have failed to recognize that 1729 is the smallest Carmichael number of the canonical form (6k +1) * (12k + 1) * (18k + 1) where each factor is prime. (This is known to almost any graduate student in number theory or primality theory, the main specializations of Ramanujan).

  96. Might prove useful for crypto by tepples · · Score: 1

    But I think we can safely say the world won't exactly change over this proof.

    A proof that a formula is correct clears the way for the formula to be used in applied mathematics. A lot of the discoveries in number theory go toward making and breaking ciphers, and RSA and DH public key systems wouldn't have been possible without a few prime number theorems.

  97. Re:India is a pseudo-democracy. by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1
    "And don't even get me started on the way women are treated throughout India. Hinduism forces shackles upon them"

    Less, so, than Islam. When is the last time that the India criminal justice system imposed a sentence of rape on a woman? Yet, Pakistan's government did this a couple of years ago (The national government only arrested the rapists after strong international pressure, but then released them, thus approving of what they did). However, if your point is to make Pakistan's unjust system look good by saying "see, they are worse!", why don't you cut to the chase and bring up North Korea and the Spanish Inquisition? Pakistan is not as bad as either of those two examples, so by golly it sure must be swell! End of argument.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  98. from wikipedia by groups.google · · Score: 0
  99. Re:How incredibly sad by notnAP · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I could not agree more.
    Mathematics at this level, in my naive opinion, is almost an art form, in that it uses unscientific methods to reach scientifically provable results. And in so doing, it reveals volumes about the method of knowledge.
    I've spent countless hours playing with calculators watching for patterns. I once worked at a job that left me sitting at a desk for hours with nothing to do but think, and playing with numbers never failed to fill the time with amusing discoveries of how numbers could produce unexpected symmetries and results.
    While I did quite well in prep school in mathematics, my love for mathematical symmetry morphed to the study of music theory in college (the two are not as dissimilar as most would think).
    There are beauties to be found in numbers, in pure mathematics. It is nothing short of the study of the world around us as expressed in purely intellectual form. At the highest level, I would not be surprised if the observations turn inward toward the observer, if the discoveries tell us more about how intellect works as it understands quantization than about the actual numbers at play.
    This "Indian math guy" would have been one hell of a guy to have dinner with. What I'd do to be inside his mind for just a short time!
    Don't mock or belittle that which you don't understand. To do so often reveals more about yourself than you probably want revealed.

  100. Re:Don't kid yourself. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you crazy? Zombies will go absolutely bananas.

  101. True story (I may post it again sometime) by QMO · · Score: 3, Funny

    As a math graduate student student I was invited to watch the presentations of the people applying for a graduate faculty position at the university. I was only able to make it to one of the presentations, but it was an unforgetable experience for me.

    The applicant gave a very interesting presentation. I got lost during the first 5 minutes when he was still giving background, but it was still interesting. His presentation was on - assuming that I remember any of the very little that I may have understood - some specific behaviors of the infinite boundaries of n-dimensional manifolds.

    The best part was when he said, "In case you think that this is just esoteric and 'out there,' I want you to know that this stuff has real applications in topology."

    There were about 6 other grad students and 15 math faculty there and I think I was the only one to notice how funny that was, so I'm sorry if you don't get the joke.

    --
    Exam 4/C again. Maybe I'll do better this time.
  102. You're right; he was definitly smarter by MarkusQ · · Score: 1

    Having seen the work of all three, and met one of them, I'd have to say that he was significantly smarter than Albert or Linus.

    --MarkusQ

  103. "Indian math guy"?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    From the writeup I know know that "some Indian math guy" did something about "how numbers can be created by adding other numbers".

    News for nerds indeed. The man is one of the most well-known mathematicians there is (as much as a mathematician can be well known). The guy even has a number named after him, 1729.
    That article also has a lot of fun Futurama references too.

    1. Re:"Indian math guy"?!?! by roror · · Score: 1

      I miss my mod points so much. When there is a good post I am outta points. :(

    2. Re:"Indian math guy"?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I miss my mod points so much. When there is a good post I am outta points. :(
      Must be karma.
  104. I know why by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1

    I know why you defend Pakistan, even the government is wrong about things and engages in religious oppression. Read Article 19 of your Constitution. It is even illegal for you to look at Islam with an open, critical mind: press freedom must only be for "the glory of Islam". I understand why you say this stuff now. No honest person would make these claims on their own.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  105. Re:How incredibly sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Actually, I think that the original poster was under the impression that most everybody who would care about the article would likely leap to the conclusion that the fellow in question was Ramanujan. I know that was the conclusion to which I lept immediately, and I'm just a redneck from Texas.

    I think all the people who think that the summary is evidence of the ignorance and racism of those of us in the US need to examine their own souls for racism. It seems to be the filter through which they view the world. Look at anything that way long enough, and you'll find whatever you're looking for even when it's not there.

    Now, I'm not going to argue that there is no ignorance or racism in the US, or even on Slashdot, just that the headline isn't evidence of it. Making elliptical references to famous people/events/things in the headlines of stories seems to be a common thing on slashdot. I often see things like A certain large software company or A certain famous litigation company And there was this election recently. Maybe you've heard of it? People do that when you're expected to get the reference, not when it's expected to get past you.

  106. Base 10? by Suidae · · Score: 1

    From TFA:

    the number of partitions for any number ending in 4 or 9 is divisible by 5

    Please forgive my non-mathmatician question, but when I think of numbers I don't think of them as 'ending' in anything in particular. If we were to use a unique symbol for every number (the way I see them in my mind), how would this change the description of these patterns? If we were to write everthing in hex would there be other interesting patterns?

    1. Re:Base 10? by MarkusQ · · Score: 1

      In math-speak, that would be "all x congruent to -1 modulo 5"; for hex the corresponding pattern of interest, (since 2 is prime) would be "ending in 1,3,5,7,9,B, or F", which in math-speak would be "all x congruent to -1 modulo 2"--in other words, what most of us would simply call "odd numbers."

      If I'm thinking streight, the corresponding statement for numbers expressed in hex, octal, or binary would be "all odd numbers can be represented as the sum of smaller numbers an even number of ways."

      • 1 (0 ways)
      • 3 = 1+1+1 or 1+2 (2 ways)
      • 5 = 1+1+1+1+1, 1+1+1+2, 1+1+3, 1+2+2, 1+4, or 2+3 (6 ways)
      • ...and so forth
      --MarkusQ
    2. Re:Base 10? by ed__ · · Score: 1

      what one labels a number is indeed arbitrary. there would still be patterns though: they arise from the way in which one number is built from other numbers (the properties of the group and its operators addition and multiplication), however if the labels are chosen so that one label has no relationship to another, then you probably won't find any interesting patterns between the labels (since there is no structure to the naming).

      of course if the labels don't relate to each other it makes it hard to know if one number is larger or smaller than another, or what the result would be when adding two numbers: everything would have to be memorized.

      the way we have chosen to label the numbers is based on their polynomial expansion. this method causes the labels themselves to have interesting relationships to the numbers they represent because of the specific structure that is imposed by the naming scheme (as well as the properties of the group itself).

      if the base were different the patterns would just be different i imagine.

      i recall an algorithm discovered a while back that would converge to the digits of pi at an arbitrary selected position, but it only worked in certain bases.

      but i might have just been dreaming. ymmv etc.

    3. Re:Base 10? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Hmmm.... If you test this hypothesis with the number 9, seems you get an ODD number of possible sums of smaller numbers (29).

      (1,8) (2,7) (3,6) (4,5) (1,1,7) (1,2,6) (1,3,5) (1,4,4) (2,2,5) (2,3,4) (3,3,3) (1,1,1,6) (1,1,2,5) (1,1,3,4) (1,2,2,4) (1,2,3,3) (2,2,2,3) (1,1,1,1,5) (1,1,1,2,4) (1,1,1,3,3) (1,1,2,2,3) (1,2,2,2,2) (1,1,1,1,1,4) (1,1,1,1,2,3) (1,1,1,2,2,2) (1,1,1,1,1,1,3) (1,1,1,1,1,2,2) (1,1,1,1,1,1,1,2) (1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1)

      Am I missing any or have any duplicates?

  107. Re:Don't kid yourself. by Canberra+Bob · · Score: 1

    Einstein == Genius

    How can you say Linus Torvalds is a genius though? The guy developed an operating system. He was not the first, he will not be the last. Were any of his developments major leaps forward in technology requiring a major insight nobody else had?

    To be honest even RMS, love him or hate him, is closer to genius than Linux as he has shown a greater leap by pushing the concept of free software - a previously unheard of concept. This required thinking outside the norm.

  108. dupe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    thank you come again.

  109. Re:How incredibly sad by jidar · · Score: 1

    holy self-indulgent tripe batman.

    I agree with the literal thing you are saying, however.

    --
    Sigs are awesome huh?
  110. Useful references by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    The best general reading about applied math in the context of Ramanujan's work and life are in G.H. Hardy's A Mathematician's Apology and Robert Kanigel's The Man Who Knew Infinity. Both are excellent reads for non mathematicians.

  111. Also suggests a low number of Indian maths guys by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 3, Interesting
    The use of the Indian math guy term also implies that there have been very few Indian mathematicians.

    India has a very long history of mathematics. eg. Pythagoras theorom was proven in India long before Pythagoras was even born.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
    1. Re:Also suggests a low number of Indian maths guys by ggvaidya · · Score: 1

      The pythagorian theorem was also known to the Babylonians, the Sumerians and the Chinese. What's your point?

    2. Re:Also suggests a low number of Indian maths guys by GlobalEcho · · Score: 1

      Although the conclusion of the Pythagorean theorem was known (long before Pythagoras) by many early civilizations, there's no evidence any of them made it into a theorem by proving it.

  112. Re:India is a pseudo-democracy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is an old practice in India where when a man dies and is cremated, the wife would throw herself into the flames to die with him.

    Occasionally the man's relatives push her into the fire so they don't have to take care of her.

    That is not a law however.

  113. Pathetic by LukePieStalker · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This sounds like it was posted by a Seventeen reader. A new low for /.

  114. Edit by ATN · · Score: 1

    Is it not possible for moderators to edit the post? I know slashdoters hate sensoring, but come on people let's show Srinivasa Ramanujan a little respect.

    1. Re:Edit by witte · · Score: 1

      I know slashdoters hate sensoring,

      I hope that was sarcasm. :)

  115. Wonder if this is related: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I bet this explains a weird coincidence I found when debugging one day. There don't appear to be very many cases where some decimal number times a constant equals it's hex representation:
    perl -e 'for ($s = 2; $s <= 64; ++$s) { print "\nfor $s\n\n"; for ($i = 1; $i < 256000; ++$i) { $h = sprintf( "%x", $i * $s ); if ($i eq $h) { print "$i * $s == 0x$h\n"; } } }'

    for 4

    1038 * 4 == 0x1038
    1040 * 4 == 0x1040
    2078 * 4 == 0x2078
    ...
    9558 * 4 == 0x9558
    9560 * 4 == 0x9560
    9600 * 4 == 0x9600

    for 6

    12480 * 6 == 0x12480
    25440 * 6 == 0x25440
    38400 * 6 == 0x38400

    for 10

    112308 * 10 == 0x112308
    I was bit by the fact that 7438 * 4 == 0x7438 and got curious about how many numbers are like this... Observation #2:
    12480/1040 = 12.000000 (dec)
    0x12480/0x1040 = 0x12 (hex)

    25440/2120 = 12.000000 (dec)
    0x25440/0x2120 = 0x12 (hex)

    38400/3200 = 12.000000 (dec)
    0x38400/0x3200 = 0x12 (hex)
    and
    38400/9600 = 4.000000 (dec)
    0x38400/0x9600 = 0x6 (hex)

    25440/6360 = 4.000000 (dec)
    0x25440/0x6360 = 0x6 (hex)
    but there's no common factor for 112308...
  116. Recommended Reading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Those who would like to learn more about the "Indian math guy" should read the excellent biography, The Man Who Knew Infinity".

  117. I AM what I AM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Almost as interesting is looking into how much human coaching AM took to come up with the results - its not all that clear how much human intervention was involved, but I've certainly heard AI researchers cast a nasturtium or two on AM (and its successor Eurisko) because the results were essentially unreproducable.

  118. Did "Namagiri" do anything else? by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 1
    Not to dis anyone's religion here, but a google of "Namagiri" has, like 80% hits on Ramanuja...

    God, Zues, even "Mormon Smith" has more relavant google hits.

    Not a troll, just what did Namagiri do before this Math Guy came along?

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
  119. Where in the first sentence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    where is his name in the sentence "This is cool - if mind-bending."?

    Yeah his name is in the link in the 4th sentence, but not explicitly referenced in plain engrish.

  120. Re:Don't kid yourself. by iocat · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I never even passed Calculus -- shit, I'm not even sure I spelled Calculus right -- and I knew exactly who Ramanujan is (and I also knew exactly what the poster was talking about when he said "Indian math guy". You have to live under a goddamn rock never to have heard of him, if you're any kind of geek or nerd.

    That said, my guess is that the poster had copied the URL of the story and couldn't remember how to spell Ramanujan, and just used some shorthand which came off as a slight where one wasn't intended. The myriad of inevitable offshoring jokes are much more offensive than the (correct if somewhat lame) description of Ramanujan as an "Indian math guy."

    --

    Dude, I think I can see my house from here.

  121. Re:How incredibly sad by Darby · · Score: 2, Interesting

    While I did quite well in prep school in mathematics, my love for mathematical symmetry morphed to the study of music theory in college (the two are not as dissimilar as most would think).

    That's certainly true.

    How's this for a strange coincidence.

    It would be tough to name the greatest mathematician, or the greatest composer of all time since there is a great deal of subjectivity to that.
    However, I believe that it's pretty generally accepted that the greatest musical dynasty was the Bach family and the greatest mathematical dynasty was the Bernoulli family.

    There were at least 3 generations of some of the greats in their respective fields.

    They lived at the same time, and within 100 miles of each other.

    I'm not saying it means anything, but it truly amazed me the first time I learned about it.

  122. Re:Don't kid yourself. by Macadamizer · · Score: 4, Informative

    Not to put down Big Al, but he only had a small armful of memorable discoveries spread over the decades of his career.

    You are kidding, right? Sure, as Einstein grew older, he produced less and less, but here's what he did in 1905 alone:

    "A New Determination of Molecular Dimensions" (Einstein's doctoral dissertation) (30 April 1905)
    Buchdruckerei K. J. Wyss, Bern, 1906.
    Also: Annalen der Physik, 19(1906), pp. 289-305.
    This is Einstein's doctoral dissertation, submitted after much delay to the University of Zurich. In it he uses available physical data on the diffusion of sugar in solution and the effect of dissolved sugar on the solution's viscosity to determine the size of sugar molecules and Avogadro's number. The analysis makes the kinetic theory of heat more definite, in so far as it provides a measure of the real size of molecules, so that they cannot be dismissed as easily as useful fictions. It is the least impressive of Einstein's work of 1905 although, curiously, the most cited.

    "On the motion of small particles suspended in liquids at rest required by the molecular-kinetic theory of heat." (Brownian motion paper) (May 1905; received 11 May 1905)
    Annalen der Physik, 17(1905), pp. 549-560.
    In this paper Einstein reports that the kinetic theory of heat predicts that small particles suspended in water must execute a random motion visible under the microscope. He suspects this motion is Brownian motion but has insufficient data to affirm it. The prediction is a powerful test of the truth of the kinetic theory of heat. A failure to observe the effect would refute the theory. If it is seen and measured, it provides a way to estimate Avogadro's number. The domain in which the effect is observed is one in which the second law of thermodynamics no longer holds, a disturbing result for the energeticists of the time.

    "On the electrodynamics of moving bodies" (special relativity) (June 1905; received 30 June 1905)
    Annalen der Physik, 17(1905), pp. 891-921.
    Einstein develops the special theory of relativity in this paper. His concern, as he makes clear in the introduction, is that then current electrodynamics harbors a state of rest, the ether state of rest, and the theory gives very different accounts of electrodynamic processes at rest or moving in the ether. But experiments in electrodynamics and optic have provided no way to determine which is the ether state of rest of all inertial state of motion. Einstein shows that Maxwell-Lorentz electrodynamics has in fact always obeyed a principle of relativity of inertial motion. We just failed to notice it since we tacitly thought that space and time had Newtonian properties, not those of special relativity.

    "Does the inertia of a body depend on its energy content?" (E=mc2) (September 1905; received 27 September 1905) Annalen der Physik, 18(1905), pp. 639-41.
    Written as a brief follow-up to the special relativity paper, this short note derives the inertial of energy: all energy E also has an inertia E/c2.

    "On a heuristic viewpoint concerning the production and transformation of light." (light quantum/photoelectric effect paper) (17 March 1905)
    Annalen der Physik, 17(1905), pp. 132-148.
    While the victory in the 19th century of the electromagnetic wave theory of light over Newton's corpuscle view is undeniable, Einstein shows that its success is incomplete. The theory gives incorrect results for the analysis of heat radiation. He looks at the thermodynamic properties of high frequency heat radiation and finds that this radiation behaves just like a collection of many spatially localized units ("quanta") of energy of magnitude hf (h=Planck's constant, f=frequency). He proceeds to show how this quantum view of light makes sense of several experiments in electrodynamics and optics, the best know being the photoelectric effect. He then described the paper as "revolutionary."

    And these were on wildly different apsects of physics -- Brownian motion, Relativity, Statistical Mechanics, Photoele

    --

    "That's not even wrong..." -- Wolfgang Pauli
  123. Ahh...you should have asked one of these questions by Schwarzchild · · Score: 1

    http://members.cox.net/xocxoc/humor/anyquestions.h tm

    My favorite question from the list:

    Are you familiar with a joint paper of Besovik and Bombialdi which might explain why the converse of Theorem 5 is false without further assumptions?
    --

    "sweet dreams are made of this..."

  124. Re:Don't kid yourself. by Sethosayher · · Score: 1

    I just want to say... INDIA ROCKS! Okay, let me stop the Nationalism >.> I think that Srinivasa Ramanujan deserves the same respect that Einstein and Torvalds does, which is the mutal respect humans have for people who make great strides in various fields. (One may argue that Torvalds hasn't done too much...but I don't want to start a flamewar).

    --
    Current State: Pirates > Cowboys + Ninjas + Robots Yarrrr
  125. Patents... by Dwonis · · Score: 1
    I wonder how long it will be until this guy's university gets a patent on his work. I mean, *obviously* he wouldn't have published his work unless he could get it patented.

    </sarcasm>

  126. Re:What implications does this have for cyptograph by thesnarky1 · · Score: 1

    I was just wondering that myself

  127. Ramanujan Biography by mtDNA · · Score: 4, Informative

    A wonderful biography of Ramanujan is, "The Man Who Knew Infinity: A Life of the Genius Ramanujan", by Robert Kanigel

    It's really interesting. Ramanujan was doing all this brilliant number theory on his own in India, and he decided to start sending his ideas around. He contacted several brilliant mathematicians, none of whom could figure out what he was talking about, largely because Ramanujan had some peculiar ways of expressing things. Finally Ramanujan contacted G. H. Hardy (at Cambridge), who saw his potential. Hardy invited Ramanujan to come to Cambridge right away, but couldn't get him to come because Ramanujan was a devout Hindu, and felt that he would be permanently "polluted" were he to leave India. Eventually, Ramanujan came to an agreement with his mother and went to spend time with Hardy, who spent a great deal of time helping Ramanujan convert his raw ideas into a more traditional, presentable form for maths journals. Ramanujan had a tough time in Cambridge, because he really didn't fit in. Eventually, he became very sick (tuberculosis, I think), and died. My understanding is that serious mathematicians are continuing to gather many new ideas in number theory from Ramanujan's notebooks, which are published by Springer-Verlag.

    --


    If you watch TV news, you know less about the world than if you just drank gin straight from the bottle.
  128. he has a name, dipshit by hildi · · Score: 0

    now, the real question, who is that 'german guy' whose face is on all the science stories?

  129. no, actually britains racism killed him by hildi · · Score: 0

    you can live quite well without meat, provided you have people who know how to cook without it. the rationing during the war limited his ability to get decent food. the attitude of morons like you didnt help. would you have made all the german jews eat pork when they came to america? no, of course not. but some indian guy? 'oh dumb hippie his fault he died'.

    1. Re:no, actually britains racism killed him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Frankly, I am amazed at narrow-minded attitude of lots of South-Indian "educated" Indians in the US who won't share the fridge with somebody who wants to keep non-veg stuff in there. That goes too far. You are free to eat what you want but you have no right to dictate what others eat. And yes, Ramanujam was a South-Indian Brahmin (strict vegetarians mostly). When Americans die of heart diseases caused by gobbling burgers over a lifetime, the rest of the world blames them.

  130. Re:India is a pseudo-democracy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am sorry to say but you could not be more wrong. I have visited India on numerous occasions and have never seen these shackles that you speak of. Women in India are open, work as they please, date as they like and earn as much as their male counterparts. There is NO repeat, NO discrimination at all in India based on gender. I have seen it first hand in many places so I do know what I am talking about. I have never been to pakistan so cannot really say much, but suffice to say that the cases reported by Pakistani Media where a women was sentenced to be raped because of a crime committed by her brother tells about the levels to which the pakistani society has descended. This is nothing but barbaric.This link is from a Pakistani newspaper. Please read it.Educated women like Dr . Khalid are also raped by soldiers with impunity regularly in Pakistan as the soldiers are protected by a military dictatorship. The only reason is that they are seen as a threat.So Sir, to reply to you, there cannot be any comparison between India and Pakistan. One is a slowly but surely rising superpower, while the other is a failed state.

  131. If you happen to be in at the ... by DaoudaW · · Score: 1

    University of Minnesota on April 1, you could go to the

    Spring 2005 Combinatorics Seminar
    Friday at 3:35, Vincent Hall 364


    April 1:Karl Mahlburg University of Wisconsin

    The Andrews-Garvan-Dyson crank and proofs of partition congruences

    Abstract: In 1944, Freeman Dyson conjectured the existence of an integer-valued crank function for partitions that would provide a combinatorial proof of Ramanujan's congruence p(11n+6) \mod{11} = 0 by dividing the partitions of 11n+6 into 11 classes of equal size. Forty years later, Andrews and Garvan successfully found such a function and proved the celebrated result that M(m,11,11n+6) = p(11n+6)/11, where M(m,N,n) is the number of partitions of n for which the crank is m modulo N. The main result of this talk proves a conjecture of Ono, which essentially asserts that Dyson's elusive crank is a universal combinatorial statistic that ``explains'' partition congruences of every known type.

  132. "Obilgatory"????? by j_w_d · · Score: 1

    N/T

    --
    ------ The only greater hazard to your liberty than n politicians is n+1 politicians.
  133. I bet Einstein with Ruby beats Ramanujan with Java by DoctoRoR · · Score: 1

    We could even toss in Linus using x86 assembly language. Aye, there's a contest to behold.

  134. Re:India is a pseudo-democracy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes and it happens as often as ritual mass suicides happen in the US. And it is definitely neither a common nor an accepted practice.

  135. Indian math guy!?? by grikdog · · Score: 5, Insightful

    By the same token, "German guess guy" is Heisenberg, "Italian nuke guy" is Fermi and "Slashdot condescension guy" is whoever bespoke "Indian math guy," referring to Ramanujan. Mathematics, made of pure thought, advances meteorically faster than the dull material world, let alone the moral, spiritual or (shall we call a spade a spade?) ethological world of semi-sentient apes and slash dotters. Ramanujan lived in a future virtually all of us cannot even imagine, and his name is revered, not because we understand him, but because he thought the future beautiful.

    --
    ``Tension, apprehension & dissension have begun!'' - Duffy Wyg&, in Alfred Bester's _The Demolished Man_
    1. Re:Indian math guy!?? by book_reader · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Give me a break, I agree with the above comment to use "Indian math guy" when we are talkng about a Srinivasa Ramanujan is stupid beyond belief. He is one of the most well known mathematicians of the 20'th century and while it is true he started out mostly self taught, he came to work with G.H. Hardy at Cambridge University where for a tragically short time he was able to work with Hardy and others. Hardy, in particular, tried very hard to teach Ramanujan stuff he needed to know and he needed to know a lot, talent alone is not enough although with Ramanujan it came real close to overcoming his lousy math background.
      Anyway, while Ramanujan was certainly posessed of great talent, it will always be an open question as to how much more he would have accomplished if he had been aware of work done by the great mathematicians of the past.
      His insights were deep but occasionally flawed, he proved very little and his astonishing native genuius was almost certainly not fully utilized because he wouldn't or couldn't "stand on the shoulders of giants: (such as Riemann or Hadamard)... Or, as Hardy put it: "What was to be done in the way of teaching him modern mathematics? The limitations of his knowledge were as startling as its profundity."

      Good short biographies may be found at:
      http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/M athem aticians/Ramanujan.html
      and http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/biography/Ramanuja n.html

    2. Re:Indian math guy!?? by Creepy+Crawler · · Score: 1

      ---Anyway, while Ramanujan was certainly posessed of great talent, it will always be an open question as to how much more he would have accomplished if he had been aware of work done by the great mathematicians of the past.

      Perhaps those thoughts and findings are the very thing retarding the scientists knowing them?

      To "know" and disregard a whole line of thinking is common with many scientist circles because it shows "no relavalency", "bad idea" or "we wont get funding through this path". Perhaps it took someone who didnt have those very preconceptions TO find these things..

      --
  136. Re:Don't kid yourself. by Compenguin · · Score: 1

    I've never heard of him, yet completed 3 semesters of calculus differential equations and some signal processing classes that are very math intensive and yet I've never heard of him and I don't "live under a goddamn rock" either.

  137. Re:How incredibly sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    His story cannot be explained in any other way but supreme in-born genius (he himself explained it by inspiration from the goddess Namagiri).

    I feel sorry for you for bringing this up. It looks like the mathematician (and you too), while being a genius in his area, could never rise above the narrow religious confines of the society that produced him. I mean, if goddess namagiri is the one responsible for the genius, why bother to praise Ramanujam? Give the man due credit and stop praising some two bit gods/godesses cooked up in some remote part of the world to support blind faiths. At least Niels Bohr was more honest:

    Einstein: "God does not play dice."

    Bohr: "Einstein, stop telling God what to do."

  138. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  139. How Romantic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "It is one of the most romantic stories in the history of mathematics ... the alien climate and culture took a toll on his health ... he returned to India in 1919. But his health failed again, and he died the next year."

  140. Re:Don't kid yourself. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Elvis is a good example of the strange things people will do for a dead guy. (Except, he's not really dead, right?)

    You mean that fat dead dude? Oh yea, love me tender, love me sweet, give me something to eat! How about that jelly doenut? Thank'ya, thank'ya very much.

  141. Bullshit! by jamrock · · Score: 2, Informative

    Thanks for the FUD, asshat. Ramanujan died of tuberculosis.

  142. Are you sure Ramanujan said that? by jamrock · · Score: 1

    I've misplaced my copy of Ramanujan's biography, "The Man Who Saw Infinity", but I seem to recall that the anecdote attributed the quote about the number 1729 to Hardy's collaborator, J.E. Littlewood, in his later years, not to Ramanujan.

  143. Check your facts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sources of vitamins here....

    http://www.healthchecksystems.com/vitamins.htm

    and about your meats here....
    "New and disputed research adds a twist to the Social Security dilemma, suggesting that a nation gorging itself on bacon double-cheeseburgers will one day dramatically shorten the average U.S. life span."
    http://www.showmenews.com/2005/Mar/2005031 7News026 .asp

    Look before you leap, and think before you speak

  144. Re:Don't kid yourself. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's not something to be proud of.

  145. EXCELLENT book. by jamrock · · Score: 1

    You beat me to it. I read the book several years ago, and it is well-written and exceedingly fascinating, and not just because of Ramanujan's poignant life, but because it is also the story of G.H. Hardy, and to a lesser extent, Hardy's collaborator, J.E. Littlewood. It is particularly notable for the descriptions of Ramanujan's life in south India as a devout, high-caste Hindu with a somewhat simple worldview, and the contrast with the Cambridge academic life of the handsome, urbane, and eccentric Englishman. Best of all, it is the story of the remarkable, unlikely collaboration between the wild talent Ramanujan, the "Prince of Intuition", and the rigorous Hardy, the "Apostle of Proof". It also conveys something of the excitement felt when Ramanujan burst on the scene, and offers a layman's glimpse into the rarefied circles of mathematical theorists. I highly recommend Kanigel's biography of Ramanujan to anyone looking for a good read, not just those interested in Ramanujan or mathematics.

  146. Re:I bet Einstein with Ruby beats Ramanujan with J by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    bah! Java is 8 times faster than Ruby!

  147. Bullshit! [Continued] by jamrock · · Score: 1

    Furthermore, you know zero about nutrition if you believe that you'll suffer from vitamin deficiencies if you don't eat animal products. Disclaimer: I love rare steaks.

    1. Re:Bullshit! [Continued] by cfalcon · · Score: 1

      My understanding was that you needed an essential nutrient (like B12) that isn't found in the normal, "purified" plant foods (wild vegetarian animals that need it can get it from the occasional bug or bug dropping that's on whatever vine they are munching). Not a big deal for the modern vegan/vegetarian: they just pop a multivitamin.

      Is this inaccurate?

    2. Re:Bullshit! [Continued] by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 1

      All it leaves out is that the vitamin suplement a vegan needs to be healthy is usually derived from animal sources.
      Technically a few of the nutrients we need to be healthy CANNOT be gotten from purely plant sources and also cannot be derived from raw chemicals(yet) and thus must have an animal source.
      A human requires both animal and plant foods to survive, and while with a carefull juggling act (simplified by vitamins and vitamin fortification of other foods and so on) it's possible to almost eliminate animal sources of nutrition, your essentially running the machine out of spec.
      If one has a moral compunction about some or all aspects of modern animal food sources that's fine, but saying a 'purely' non animal food base is healthier than what the body is elvoved to use natively is like saying a car can run better with the wrong mix of gas/air and a different type of lubricant. You might make it work, but it's sub-optimal. Though fast food and the food choices made by many today is often even less healthy.
      The ideal would be to find the mixture of foods that work best for you.
      IIRC I've heard that there is some statistical link between blood type (just the a,b,ab,o part) and balance between plant and animal food, with type o having the strongest preferences for meats and ab the least.
      The real problem is our tastes are geared to prefer things that used to be needed but rare so that we wouldn't short ourselves on critical nutrients easilly. Unfortunately we now can produce large amounts of the 'rare' foods easily and even produce the flavours in non-rare foods and our tastes haven't caught up so we tend to eat too much of foods that while necessary in smaller amounts are downright harmfull in large amounts.

      Mycroft

      --
      https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
  148. Smells of racism (or is it the outsourcing?) by reachbach · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Is it the agony of losing jobs to India that's making this tim guy say this?Is he being racist?Or is it the typical ingorance of the american simpleton? Did he forget to RTFA himself?Is it the fact that living in Seattle is showing up on the poor soul (what with the M$ winds blowing from that direction?)
    It's time to boot out such ignorant, partonizing frustrated individuals from slashdot(or boycott slashdot itself for having allowed such arrogant statements). Speaks volumes about the incompetent editors of slashdot, doesn't it? They would probably prove that they're unbiased by letting through future posts that speak of
    "Some black american guy who plays a bit of Basketball" or "some fag from princeton who keeps jabbering about game theory" or "some american chess guy who's running round the globe to save his ass".
    Such posts are in real bad taste, to say the least, and the editors are showing their pathetic standards by letting them through. STFW for Srinivasa Ramanujam, read through his findings, (given your negative IQ , you might spend the next decade of your life trying to comprehend what he put together in a year) and you'll know the enormity of the achievements of "Indian math guy".
    Installing Fedora core doesn't make you a genius, wise one.

  149. Re:Don't kid yourself. by mamba-mamba · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Einstein was very smart.

    I wouldn't want to put him down.

    But I agree that Ramanujan was a phenomenon. He was so completely different from any of his contemporary mathematicians that there is really no comparison.

    He was discovered by the west when he sent a manuscript to Hardy, a famous English mathematician. Hardy almost discarded it, since much of it was stuff he had seen before (though Ramanujan had rediscovered it independently), but it also contained 120 thereoms no one but Ramanujan had ever seen before.

    Later, when he came to England, Ramanujan filled notebooks with thousands of theorems, though not, apparently with proofs. I think proving Ramanujan's thereoms is still a major occupation of academia.

    Interestingly, there is a similar story involving Einstein. Bose, who was an unknown Indian physics instructor, sent an unsolicited manuscript to Einstein which eventually led to the theory of Bose statistics, or Bose-Einstein statistics and the Bose condensate.

    Crackpots from all over the world were sending Einstein manuscripts, and Bose's manuscript looked a lot like one of these. But Einstein read it anyway, and saw that Bose's ideas had merit. Ultimately, it seemed that Bose only had the one really good idea in him, and after collaborating with Einstein on the one paper, he went back to India and continued teaching. Apparently he was an especially good teacher.

    MM

    --
    By including this sig, the copyright holders of this work or collection unreservedly place it in the public domain.
  150. Re:Don't kid yourself. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've heard of him, and I've never even taken calculus.

  151. Just scratching the surface... by gnovos · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Now start to get your head around this... what if numbers are just, well, *human* constructs. As hard as that is to get your head around, think how easily that little concept completely changes your view of things.

    If numbers are human constructs and nothing "inherant" in the universe, then the patterns that we find are not that unexpected. Humans are pattern hunting machines.

    --
    "Your superior intellect is no match for our puny weapons!"
  152. Re:I bet Einstein with Ruby beats Ramanujan with J by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I bet Joe Sixpack using Eiffel beats the three of them combined. ;)

  153. Everyone here knows 256 is an interesting number by Simonetta · · Score: 1

    I go to the grocery store and the bill for my beer comes to $2.56.
    "Oh, two fifty six." I smile to the cashier, "That is the number two multiplied by itself eight times!"

    She gives me that look like she's not sure if she calls security that they will have me on the floor at gunpoint before I explode.

    You Americans, you know that look. Someone gives it to you every day.

  154. Linus did not invent anything by mamladm · · Score: 1

    Linus himself has been on public record at multiple occasions saying that "operating system code is nothing that is invented and that he is not an inventor.

    --
    the macintosh asterisk mailing list http://www.astm
  155. Beautiful pun! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    There's more on the Finish computer guy here [kernel.org].

    By an amazing coincidence, Bill Gates is the Start (menu) guy!

  156. Uhmm... No. by KZigurs · · Score: 1

    But this is slashdot. Would it be wise to except any kind of sense here?

    (Linus is an asshole. Yeah, he's cool, but he IS NOT A GOD.)

  157. Why is Pakistan "glued" to India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I don't understand why Pakistan is "glued" to India whenever the word India is mentioned. Though we are similar looking people, we just don't have anything in common. Except the skin colour, we have absolutely nothing in common. We are very very different from the Pakistanis.

  158. Re:Everyone here knows 256 is an interesting numbe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I met a very attractive woman once who gave me her phone number. 256-1024. When I got excited and said, out loud, to her, "Cool! Powers of 2!" I knew I was a geek and I'd never see her naked.

  159. Re:Don't kid yourself. by Compenguin · · Score: 1

    In what context did you hear of him?

  160. Please get your facts right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The sentence of rape was imposed by the tribal elders of a remote part of Pakistan that is mostly beyond the reach of law of Pakistan itself. It was *not* imposed by anything remotely approaching Pakistan's formal legal system.

    http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/ ch ronicle/archive/2004/05/10/MNG996IUEO1.DTL

    Six of the rapists and instigators in this case were sentenced to death by Pakistan's legal system, Which does not suggest to me that it condones such an act in any way.

  161. Wow, numbers can be created adding other numbers by gotan · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I assume these numbers are added to numbers to create (astonishingly) numbers. And this operation can even be applied to all prime numbers! This is really mindbending and puzzling and probably innovative too. Is this method patented yet? Hey, i got a great idea: let's use the "+" sign for this operation, something like "+(number1,number2)", i think i'll patent that.

    Maybe that anonymous reader should've freed himself from the mindbended state briefly and taken the few extra seconds to specify "numbers" for the benefit of the readers.

    --
    "By the way if anyone here is in advertising or marketing... kill yourself." -- Bill Hicks
  162. Re:How incredibly sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I agree. It's not like he was a high pitched nerdrapper.

  163. Beautiful by Randym · · Score: 1
    Humans are pattern hunting machines.

    The flip side of this, is that, we are also pattern *makers*: that's why we perceive a picture of the Virgin Mary on a cheese sandwich, or once, in the heavens, constellations as patterns of stars.

    When all you are is a pattern hunting machine, though, everything looks like a pattern. Try not to be paranoid -- some apparent patterns really AREN'T.

    --
    DNA is a Turing machine. You, however, being dynamic and emergent, are not.
  164. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  165. Srinivasa Ramanujan was NOT Blind Tom by Ludd's+Brudder · · Score: 3, Informative
    mentioned in an article about David Helfgott
    "The mentally retarded Tom, born a slave in Georgia in 1850, was exhibited by his former owner, a Mr. P.H. Oliver, in the nineteenth century as "the greatest musical prodigy since Mozart." A contemporary description of one of his concerts "shrivels the soul," according to Harold Schonberg. Tom would sit at the piano to be bribed by Mr. Oliver with cakes and candy until he played. At the end of each piece he would applaud himself violently. Tom was lauded by the media of his day as "incredibly gifted." One critic was certain she detected in his playing the mark of genius: "Some beautiful caged spirit, one could not but know, struggled for breath under that brutal form and idiotic brain." According to Schonberg, Tom attracted in his day more attention than all other American pianists put together. He toured England and even played at the White House. Blind Tom died in obscurity in New Jersey in 1908. Where Mr. Oliver retired to is unrecorded."
    It's unlikely that Tom's fame was due to any musical talent.
    1. Re:Srinivasa Ramanujan was NOT Blind Tom by corngrower · · Score: 1

      based on this article, he quite likely was autistic.

  166. Re:Don't kid yourself. by stor · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Not to put down Big Al, but he only had a small armful of memorable discoveries spread over the decades of his career.

    Only on Slashdot would there be a dude who argues that _Einstein's_ number of discoveries was mediocre ;)

    Relative to other geniuses, of course... *ow!*

    Cheers
    Stor

    --
    "Yeah well there's a lot of stuff that should be, but isn't"
  167. Re:Cannabilism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    No dude. Sati has nothing to do with cooking one's spouse. You should read the links you post, because it makes you look extremely ignorant. I don't seek any possible connection to sati and satay either.

    Also don't appreciate the inference that satay. (In case you were wondering what it is you're really ordering at that Thai restaurant.) has anything to do with cannibalism.

    I'd also like to point out that sati is extremely rare these days and has been illegal in India for many decades.

    I guess in /. open bigotry towards Indians is accepted.

  168. some guy??????? by carlmenezes · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What's up with that? So they only have names when they're American scientists? Do you know how much Srinivasa Ramanujam contributed to math??? Just because YOU don't know them does NOT make them any less deserving of the respect they SHOULD get from everyone for their contribution to the field!! Or are you just another one of those hicks who respects people based on their nationality and on rubbish like "if i don't know them, they're not worth knowing"?

    Have some decency. Recognize genius and respect it. What have you accomplished? Even 1/10th of what any respected scientist has? Don't you expect people to call you by your name and not "hey you"? Why not give the same respect to others?

    I'm also surprised that the Slashdot editors let this story be published without correcting it!! What, are story submissions now governed by a perl script?

    RANT OFF.

    --
    Find a job you like and you will never work a day in your life.
  169. Good Will Hunting by saha · · Score: 3, Informative
    If you took a few calculus you would have to learn a little history about Gottfried Leibniz and Issac Newton fathers of modern calculus. On the other hand if you say Pierre de Fermat (father of differential calculus), everyone has heard of Fermat's Last Theorem.

    If you took number theory or some high level mathematics courses and never heard about Srinivasa Ramanujan it would be akin to studying relativistic physics and never hearing about Albert Einstein .

    Most people probably heard about Ramanujan recently from the movie "Good Will Hunting". Where they refer to Ramanujan by name several time during the movie, although they totally butchered his name and made me cringe every time they said it. The movie is based on a Ramanujan type character, in Hollywood fashion though. Where a young good looking confidant and outgoing Matt Damon with the physique of a construction worker plays the math genius. Ramanujan was shy, introvert, awkward and not in the best physical health.

    1. Re:Good Will Hunting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where they refer to Ramanujan by name several time during the movie, although they totally butchered his name and made me cringe every time they said it.

      One must remember that the movie is set in Boston.

    2. Re:Good Will Hunting by Cryogenes · · Score: 3, Insightful


      If you took number theory or some high level mathematics courses and never heard about Srinivasa Ramanujan it would be akin to studying relativistic physics and never hearing about Albert Einstein

      Not true. I am a math PhD, but none of my profs ever mentioned Ramanujan to me. Hofstadter's Gödel-Escher-Bach devotes a chapter to Ramanujan, as do several other other popular science books, but it is more for the good story than for his actual merits.

      Becoming a grandmaster requires talent and guidance. Ramanujan had great talent but no proper guidance and as a result the product of his tragic life is mostly curiosities and anecdotes. He has some good results, but there is no comparison between him and people like Pierre Fermat or Albert Einstein who single-handedly created new branches of science.

  170. Re:Don't kid yourself. by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Even if Bose had only one good idea, he still did better than most of us. Plus a good teacher, especially in the 'hard' subjects, isn't to be sneered at eigther. Not that you seemed to be putting him down.

    Mycroft

    --
    https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
  171. Re:Don't kid yourself. by Ludd's+Brudder · · Score: 1

    Einstein was an intelligent man, but there are some doubts about how much stature to accord him. Perhaps you missed the PBS examination of the role his wife played in developing those early ideas, and perhaps you've ignored the more serious accusations leveled against him.

    There's no doubt, however, that his importance to anti-Nazi propogandists deserves considerably more comment than it has received.

  172. Re:Don't kid yourself. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The domain in which the effect is observed is one in which the second law of thermodynamics no longer holds

    Do you want to try that again? The second law of thermodynamics is believed to hold everywhere in the universe. Where is this "domain" of which you speak?

  173. Some American dude wrote this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How does this get through? There should be guidelines against this.

    It's highly offensive that the story purports to report an important development in Math, and the main protagonist does not even get to have his name mentioned AT ALL, because he's from India.

    Should we demonstrate prejudice and just assume some American dude wrote this? Do you act like this because when you're a teenager, if you wanna have fun, you only get to fuck overweight girls, do crystal meth, sit around the house playing video games and watching war movies? Is that the reason you're so mentally incapacitated?

    And they wonder why they're hated everywhere around the globe...
    I'm not Indian, BUT I AM SO FUCKING ANGRY! PAY YOUR RESPECTS, MAN!

    1. Re:Some American dude wrote this? by cornjchob · · Score: 1

      You're right--the arthur's one of my white-supremacist buddies; inbetween linchings last week, he showed me a rough draft of the article he submitted and I said, "Now hold on for a minute, Jethro--did you just refer to Ramanujan by his name?"

      Seriously, how the hell can any one of you self-righteous PC crackpots get off on the notion that it was intentionally ommited? As another posted out, perhaps the arthur simply forgot how to spell his name and was too lazy to look it back up. I'll agree that the name should've been in there somewhere, but christ--none of you would be bitching if someone referred to the scrawnly white loner from the boonies who invented TV. His name was Filo T. Farnsworth, and even though he, too, was one of the greatest minds of the early 20th century, I doubt most people here have heard of him. Outside of anyone in the /. community, I've never said his name without explaining. Grow up, and realized the ommission of non-known names in favor of a title more generic title is not an American phenomenon, nor is it necessarily bad. As many other posters pointed out, what're you more likely to remember: Ramanujan, or an Indian Math Guy? I'll take my fly down so when you get here you have one less step to go through.

      --
      We now have confirmed reports from an informed Orange County minister that Ethel is still an active communist.
  174. Re:Even Ben Affleck knows who Ramanujan is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Funniest. Comment. Ever.

  175. Better example of unexpected genius by Ludd's+Brudder · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Mir Sultan Khan arrived in England in 1929 as manservant to an Indian Maharaja, and immediately took the European chess world by storm (the Wikipedia article compares him to Morphy). He convincingly defeated all the great players of that era -- Alekhine, Capablanca, Euwe, Rubenstein, more, but when the American master Reuben Fine visited the maharaja's digs in London, Khan was the waiter who served the meal. In 1933, the maharaja left England and Khan was taken back to India: no more tournament chess for him.

    His story is not the same as the story of Blind Tom, in spite of cetain similarities. There is no indication that Khan's owner/employer exploited those remarkable talents, and the talents were in fact measurably remarkable. In the case of Blind Tom, one is tempted to think of S. Johnson's remark: "Sir, a woman's preaching is like a dog's walking on his hind legs. It is not done well; but you are surprised to find it done at all." [from Boswell's Life of Johnson]

  176. Snowclones by Ludd's+Brudder · · Score: 1

    Language Log refers to these constructs as "Snowclones", and cites several examples.

  177. I am gald... by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    ... to see low intensity racism having still supporters in /.

    Heartwarming.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
    1. Re:I am gald... by bbuR_bbuB · · Score: 1

      What's gald?

  178. Or simply consider... by blorg · · Score: 1

    ...that with a compression algorithm that claimed to compress _any_ file, you could just keep feeding its output back into itself, effectively allowing the reduction of _any_ file to 1 bit.

    Which is clearly not possible.

  179. Re:What implications does this have for cyptograph by mozu · · Score: 1

    IANAGOC (I am not a guru of cryptology). I think what this means is that you can tell a skimpy clad up-for-it busty prime number from a mile away. Traditionally you had to weigh, measure, calculate etc to tell if a prime was really a hot young chick and not a result of 10 pints of alycyhol. Now just by looking at what congruence each number gives you can judge whether its a prime or not. (I can't say for certain because the article is short on details of what these patterns are.)

    I don't really know what method of cryptanalysis is used for breaking the RSA, but suppose if you can weed out the non-prime numbers you can drastically reduce the amount of calculations needed.

    If you know better and think I'm wrong please do correct me and join in the discussion before any damage is done.

  180. Re:so the world by Ludd's+Brudder · · Score: 1

    QOTD at the bottom of Slashdot's page, as I'm reading your comment:

    "I gained nothing at all from Supreme Enlightenment, and for that very reason it is called Supreme Enlightenment." -- Gotama Buddha

  181. My idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not a very good one, as it "inflates" the number instead of compresses it.

    pi search

    Use pi search to find the number. The index into pi is the compressed value.
    the 'PPB' algorithm

    The PPB algorithm can extract the data without having to calculate pi.

    The problem is that with any random or psuedo random sequence, the probability for finding any large amount of data is tiny, and the index would be larger than the actual data.

    It inflates the info :(

  182. There is no difference by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1
    "Well, that was technically an attempt at communism, not socialism"

    Marx used the terms communism and socialism almost interchangably. The Soviet Union was made up of socialist republics (see the first S in USSR). However, in general usage, "communism" tends to be used for only the more extreme version of socialism.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  183. Re:Don't kid yourself. by mwlewis · · Score: 1

    I first heard about him when I read Hardy's A Mathematician's Apology. A great read. Also heard about him when I took number theory.

    --
    JOIN US FOR PONG!
  184. Blind Tom by juanco · · Score: 3, Informative

    Wikipedia has its own version of the blind slave pianist:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blind_Tom

    --
    -- Juanco
  185. Getting the facts straight. by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1
    "Six of the rapists and instigators in this case were sentenced to death by Pakistan's legal system"

    Only after international outrage and pressure.

    "Which does not suggest to me that it condones such an act in any way."

    You are right. The death sentence does not suggest that the Pakistani government condones it. The fact that all of the rapists were released from prison? Set free? That shows that the Pakistani government condoned the act.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  186. Parallel argument for primes by tepples · · Score: 1

    Really, I can't fathom how people would choose primes over protiens when protiens may help the fight against cancer amongst others. Please follow the link at least and take a look.

    Contrariwise, I can't fathom how people would choose proteins over primes when primes may help the fight against identity theft amongst others. Please follow the link at least and take a look:

    RSA Factoring Challenge FAQ

  187. Cryptography? by northcat · · Score: 2, Interesting

    OK, so I'm an idiot in maths, and I've read about prime numbers and cryptography and how predicting prime numbers can help crack encrypted material, so is this development of any significance with cryptography?

    1. Re:Cryptography? by cpeikert · · Score: 1

      OK, so I'm an idiot in maths, and I've read about prime numbers and cryptography and how predicting prime numbers can help crack encrypted material, so is this development of any significance with cryptography?

      It isn't, at least not for the near future.

      Editors of magazine articles for lay people seem to have some algorithm which scans for the phrase "prime numbers" and automatically adds a clause "the research may have applications in cryptography." (They did the same thing with the efficient deterministic primality test of a few years ago -- but honestly, it didn't much affect crypto directly in any significant way. We already had good enough primality testers.)

      I have never seen anything in cryptography that has anything remotely to do with partitions of numbers. That isn't to say that there never will be, but there sure isn't any direct application of this research today.

      With that said, one can never predict what insights might be useful in the future. Everything that improves our understanding of number theory could help somewhere down the line.

  188. I would venture to say.... by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1
    "One is a slowly but surely rising superpower, while the other is a failed state">

    I would even venture to say that Pakistan is an illegitimate entity. It broke from India in that war in order to deny basic human rights. The official name of the country is "Islamic Republic of Pakistan", which is an open declaration of war on Pakistanis and their right to make their own religious decisions.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  189. Can this be used as proof of a number being prime? by master_p · · Score: 1

    And if so, could this proof be of any practical value?

  190. Another Puzzle by Kainaw · · Score: 1

    Well, I realized that if you multiply any number by 4, you can represent the total as a sequence of odd numbers. Actually, there's more than one sequence if the original number is not prime. One is obviously half the sum plus/minus 1. The other is longer. For example, 21*4 = 84 = 9+11+13+15+17+19. So, where's my /. article?

    --
    The previous comment is purposely vague and generalized, but all of the facts are completely true.
    1. Re:Another Puzzle by farmhick · · Score: 1

      Building on this, why are the squares of 24 and 26 exactly 100 apart? And how does this tie in with work done by 'a Greek math guy'?

      --
      I have to stop wasting so much time reading Slashdot. It's interfering with my crystal meth addiction.
    2. Re:Another Puzzle by mzs · · Score: 1

      You do not get an article because any positive integer can be trivially represented as a sequence of odd primes by using the unary representation:

      1=1
      2=1+1
      3=1+1+1
      4=1+1+1+1

      The article was about a statement that took something like 60 years to prove and then just recently a generalization was discovered and proved. Two very different things.

    3. Re:Another Puzzle by Kainaw · · Score: 1

      You do not get an article because any positive integer can be trivially represented as a sequence of odd primes by using the unary representation:

      I said "sequence", not "set". You are using a "set". A "sequence" has a formula to get from one item to the next. Technically, your formula could be x(i) = x(i-1) + 0. However, I was using a sequence of odd numbers, which implies that x(i) is odd and x(i) = x(i-1) + 2. So, I was using a sequence of odd numbers without skipping any odd numbers from the lowest number to the highest number in the sequence.

      --
      The previous comment is purposely vague and generalized, but all of the facts are completely true.
  191. Re:Don't kid yourself. by Travis+Fisher · · Score: 1
    It is the least impressive of Einstein's work of 1905 although, curiously, the most cited.

    Random theory: perhaps this is related to the bike shed effect. The observation for this effect is that "getting permission to build a billion-dollar atomic power plant is easy, but a proposal to build a cheap bicycle shed will founder under the weight of endless discussion." This is theorised to be because "an atomic plant is so vast, expensive, and complicated that people cannot grasp it, rather than try, they'll fall back on the assumption that somebody else checked details before it got that far. However, everyone knows all about bicycle sheds, and feels no inhibition against debating their pettiest details without limit."

    Perhaps more people work on diffusion effects of sugar in water because this is a more down-to-earth thing to think about drinking your coffee in the morning...

  192. Re:Cannabilism by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1
    No dude. Sati has nothing to do with cooking one's spouse. You should read the links you post, because it makes you look extremely ignorant. I don't seek any possible connection to sati and satay either.

    Also don't appreciate the inference that satay. (In case you were wondering what it is you're really ordering at that Thai restaurant.) has anything to do with cannibalism.

    I'd also like to point out that sati is extremely rare these days and has been illegal in India for many decades.

    I guess in /. open bigotry towards Indians is accepted.


    Relax, it's a joke. It's an ironic poke at the ignorance of slashdot. Sorry if it was too subtle for you.

    And apparently you don't know everything about your own country (I'm assuming you're Indian). Sati has been illegal, not for decades, since 1829. That's coming up on two centuries.

    Look, I understand why you're defensive. There is a lot of bigotry on slashdot, especially towards Indians. Many people's livelihoods are threatened. Ironically, many who are ardent capitalists are the most threatened, and the most bigoted. I guess when your political principles are based on "enlightened self interest" it's easy to conveniently change them when the outcome doesn't serve that self-interest.

    Outsourcing is a bitter pill to swallow, but I believe we should take our medicine if we want to stay competitive. We've had it so good for so long that we now believe it's our right. Guess what? It's not. Our opulent (and sometimes even decadent) lifestyles have made us soft and lazy, and competition is hard and takes a lot of work. I'm confident we'll meet the challenge, but not until after a lot of pain and adjustment. A lot of Americans will suffer, and are suffering. However, a lot of suffering goes on throughout the world, and we have no right to think we are somehow immune because we are Americans.

    It's not surprising that we put a gang of criminals into power, because Americans are in love with the ideology of capitalism and the criminals talk a good game of capitalist ideology. They want to destroy what safety nets we have while at the same time engage in a huge give-away to their closest friends and allies. And we go along with it because we don't understand the principles of capitalism, but are mesmerized by the ideology in the same way that compulsive gamblers are mesmerized by the lottery. We've become brittle, when we need to become more flexible.

    Personally, I want to move to Mexico, because that's where the jobs are going to be in ten years, and the cost of living is much cheaper. I don't want to wait too long, because eventually Mexico will try to close the border to prevent too many gringos from sneaking in.
    --
    It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
  193. Crystal meth, video games and overweight girls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See, this is what happens when your average American dude only has the following options for fun: 1) fucking overweight girls; 2) staying at the house playing video games; 3) taking crystal meth at parties.

    Your brain gets so wasted you can't even copy & paste or google for something. It doesn't matter how much technology you develop to enable people, some of them will always remain retarded. Spelling someones foreign name would just makes that guy's brain crap out.

  194. you did not miss any... by mzs · · Score: 1

    The grandparent post's logic is incorrect. You cannot just reduce the bases that way and hope to get anything meaningful. In fact look at the original statement and take the case of the number 4. It has the trivial partitions of:

    4
    1 3
    2 2
    1 1 2
    1 1 1 1

    There are 5 of them, which fits the bill of being divisible by 5. Now the grandparent poster thought he saw a pattern by reducing to base two but in order for his claim to hold he had to change it so that it was the sum of all SMALLER numbers. That should have been the tip-off that something was amiss.

  195. That's Incredible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    D'you remember the early 80's television show, "That's Incredible"? There was a guy on there that could catch a bullet with his teeth, and I can't remember the guy's name. He must be thinking, "What do I have to do to impress some people?"

    -- stolen from some comedian, poorly, by some anonymous guy.

  196. Re:Don't kid yourself. by Fahrenheit+450 · · Score: 1

    What would you have to say about Paul Erdos?

    You know... that coffe drinking homeless guy who did a little math.

    [my Erdos number=3]

    --
    -30-
  197. On Wisconsin! by berbo · · Score: 1

    madcity rocks the house again.

  198. Re:Don't kid yourself. by SeventyBang · · Score: 1

    I knew Erdos first-hand - spent a brief time while I was in high school - studying with him at Indiana University (Bloomington, Indiana) in the late 70s and with Douglas Hofstadter at roughly the same time.

    Several years later, I was at a math conference (as premed) and he walked up to me and started talking about some of the things I'd proposed. The profs I was with almost wet their pants just because I knew him, let alone that he knew me or had interest in things I'd discussed with him years ago (in high school)

  199. Re:Don't kid yourself. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Um, any domain that is not a closed system?

  200. Re:some guy??????? by ForemastJack · · Score: 2, Funny

    "I'm also surprised that the Slashdot editors let this story be published without correcting it!! What, are story submissions now governed by a perl script?"

    Unlikely.

    I, for one, have considerable confidence that a fairly simple perl script could at least competently produce basic English spelling and grammar.

  201. Oh My God! by jellisky · · Score: 1

    That's awesome!

    Back in my undergraduate days, I actually worked on a similar problem to this at the Rose-Hulman REU. I initially thought that the theorem he proved was the conjecture we put at the end of our final writeup, but it sounds like he proved something else, sadly.

    The Ramanujan congruences are incredible bits of number theory. They're pathetically simple to explain to the lay-person, but often take some ingenious logical and mathematical work to prove them. I learned so much about other higher-level mathematics during that REU than I would've in any one class in graduate school.

    -Jellisky

  202. My error (note the cavet in my post) by MarkusQ · · Score: 1

    You are correct, I incorrectly generalized the result. From the result, we know that there should be some pattern (two is a prime, and the proof is that such a pattern optains for all primes), but my off-the-cuff guess as to what it was is clearly wrong.

    --MarkusQ

  203. Re:Srinivasa Ramanujan? [winhat] by winhat · · Score: 0

    The nose is an echo in here! There is an ugly thing. Prejudice is an offensive weapon designed for cutting and thrusting. Benjamin franklin was an english writer. He wrote nineteen eighty four and animal matter. Howdy to you, pardner! Yee-haw! Did you like to go to one central place for music, movie and tv-series downloads where i know the quality of the temple of heaven, from the throne, saying, "it is done" and there were voices, and thunders, and lightnings; and there was a greek mathematician. His book the elements of geometry set down how geometry was to write the shortest self-reproducing program.

    I'd very much like to go to one central place for music, movie and tv-series downloads where i know the quality of the favorites was to be a stumbling block for mozilla.

  204. I was wrong... by MarkusQ · · Score: 1

    I was wrong, but not quite as wrong as you make it sound.

    First off, ignoring the trivial partition just changes the parity, which would not affect any even/odd pattern beyond reverting the sense ("always even" <--> "always odd"). Using a trivial isomorphism is hardly a "tip-off that something is amiss".

    Secondly, two is a prime and the proof in question AFAIK applies to all primes not just odd primes. The whole point of the discovery is that you can "reduce the bases that way" and you are guarenteed to "get something meaningful." So there is some pattern to the partitions of odd vs. even numbers, modulo some base, I was just incorrect in guessing what it is.

    --MarkusQ

    1. Re:I was wrong... by mzs · · Score: 1

      Sorry maybe I was a little testy in my reply. It just bugged me that you gave such an authoritative sounding reply to someone that said they were not a maths person which was flawed. I suppose one can think of changing bases as a trivial isomorphism, in fact it is identity. If that was what would have worked here though you would not have had to change the conjecture to use all numbers smaller. That should be a tip-off that the conjecture may not be true.

      In fact the logical error is that you were considering the identity transformation but really you were in fact over two different spaces. One was represented by Dn*10^n+...+D0*10^0 and the other by Hm*16^m+...+H0*16^0 and the manner in which you changed bases does not work that way as you move from one to the other. In fact simply considering that 10=2*5 and the original statement was mod 5 not mod 2 gives a gut feeling that there is more at work.

    2. Re:I was wrong... by MarkusQ · · Score: 1

      I think we are not understanding each other. At the very least, I am not understanding you.

      1. The isomorphism I mentioned was from "there are an even/odd number of partitions not counting the trivial partition" to/from "there are an odd/even number of partitions counting the trivial partition. Since there is exactly one trivial partition (e.g., 1432 can be represented as the sum of one integer in exactly one way, namely, the integer 1432) including/excluding it just flips the parity. It's not in any way a deep or meaningful difference.
      2. If you are representing numbers in a base X, and taking them modulo some prime P which is a factor of X, you only need to look at the last digit. In the case of base 16, P must be 2, whereas in base ten it can be 2 or 5. Saying that a decimal number "ends in 4 or 9" is the same thing as saying that it is congruent to -1 modulo 5.

      The original poster asked if there was a similar pattern for hexidecimal numbers. Since 2 is the only prime factor of 16 (and because the discovery was that there was a pattern for the partitions of any number congruent to -1 modulo some prime) we can be sure that there is some pattern to the number of partitions of odd numbers.

      I will admit, I don't know what it is.

      --MarkusQ

  205. Your troll might make sense by AtariAmarok · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Your troll might make sense if it was on-topic and factual.

    "What a complete joke of a post, rape as a punishment? What are you waffling about? Are you so blind that you believe everything you hear on TV?"

    What does TV have to do with this? I read this from Pakistani sources. Even the Pakistani "patriot" who posted the parent item knows about it.

    "Obviously, there is a war going on with the Muslims right now, obviously, negative propaganda about them will be encouraged."

    "Propaganda" defined by you as information you don't like and would want to keep secret.

    "I remember studying British Propaganda about the Germans in World War 2"

    And I remember studying the Crimean war. But what does either entirely irrelevant situation have to do with anything? Oh wait. Your example is connected a little: like WW2 Germany, Pakistan is governed by a military dictatorship that has a foreign policy goal of exterminating Jews (they do not recognize the rights of Israelis to exist). It is not anywhere near as bad as Nazi Germany, but it is rather antisemitic.

    "Not to mention the fake Iraqis overturning incubators"

    What were these fake Iraqis really, once you took their "Iraqi costumes" off. Were they Bildeburger agitprop agents? Or was it Mossad guys?

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  206. Re:Don't kid yourself. by changcho · · Score: 1

    What?!? Einstein '..only had a small armful of memorable discoveries spread over the decades of his career..'?!? Please, do your homework and THEN post. Your comment makes you sound quite like the person who posts about something they know little about. Ramanujan may or may not have been smarter than Eintein (I don't think we should be including Linus in the same league as either man, but whatever), but what counts is what each's contributions are. See Macadamizer's post for 'Big AL's contributions to human knowledge and see mamba-mamba's post for Ramanujan's contributions. Or even better, consult each man's biographies.

  207. Re:Don't kid yourself. by changcho · · Score: 1

    There is some evidence that Mileva (Einstein's wife at the time) contributed to shaping Einstein's ideas. However, her contributions were at the level that one acknowledges at the end of a scientific paper ('thanks to person X for insightful conversations'). There is no evidence she contributed fundamentally to Einstein's ideas. As for the 'accusations' (http://home.comcast.net/~xtxinc/mileva.htm), well, I guess we MUST believe it because it's on the web, right? C'mon...

  208. Re:Srinivasa ? by skybird0 · · Score: 1
    Just like the expectation of an American being a world-class cricket player (who is not an expatriate from a traditional 'cricket' country).

    How about an American being a world-class football (soccer) player such as Tim Howard, goalkeeper for the most famous team in the world -- Manchester United of England.

    In any case, anyone familiar with mathematics would immediately identify "That Indian Math Guy" as Ramanujan, with no disrespect intended.

  209. So, this isn't about the Rubik's Cube? by wyldwyrm · · Score: 1

    I'm still trying to figure that out, so I'm not reading any further.

  210. Re:Don't kid yourself. by iocat · · Score: 1

    I'm sure I heard a professor talk about him in Calculus, and then I read about him in several popular math books, like either Ivar Peterson's Mathematical Tourist or one of the popular books on the solving of Fermet's last theorum.

    --

    Dude, I think I can see my house from here.

  211. Reminds me of.. by Wescotte · · Score: 1

    Reading about Srinivasa Ramanujan reminds me of a finding a solution for the following pattern. It's very very simplistic but took me quite some time to actually figure out. See my reply for the solution.

    The basic idea is you can take any number and the end result will be 4.

    Here are some examples
    Staring Value: Sequence

    -1: 11, 6, 3, 5, 4
    0: 4
    1: 3, 5, 4
    2: 3, 5, 4
    10: 3, 5, 4
    5293: 33, 11, 6, 3, 5, 4

  212. Solution by Wescotte · · Score: 1

    Just count the number of letters in the number
    0 - Zero 4
    -1 - Negative One 11, Eleven 5 five, 4 four
    5293 - Five Thousand Two Hundred Nintey Three 33, Thirty Three 11, Eleven 5, Five 4

  213. Re:Real-world applications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Real-world applications?

    That, my friend, is your discovery to make."

  214. Plotting on the Re-Im plane by tepples · · Score: 1

    [Descartes called numbers of the form a + bj "imaginaire"] because they could not be plotted using his cartesian coordinate system

    "Could not be plotted" or "could not be plotted by Descartes"? Look at any Laplace transform or z-transform of an analog or digital filter. You'll see poles and zeroes plotted as Xs and Os centered at points (x, y), where each pole or zero corresponds to x + yj in the s- or z-plane. In general, the plot of a single complex number n on a cartesian plane is a bullet centered at (Re(n), Im(n)).

  215. Simple by EggplantMan · · Score: 1
    The second 'law' does not hold for quantum systems. The second 'law' is not so much a law but merely a statement about statistics that says in a macroscopic system the odds are overwhelming that entropy tends to increase. In a small (quantum) system the statistics can be quite different. So really it is not too difficult to come up with situations where the second law is violated.

    Even in large systems it is theoretically possible to see it violated, it would just take longer than the existence of the universe for you to ever observe such a violation.

    --

    ?-|||-----x<*))))><
  216. Re:Srinivasa Ramanujan? or article quality by darealpat · · Score: 1

    Let me see if i get this right: You say that what matters is the quality of the original post, and not the content of the post?!!!? IMHO you should no longer take up precious bandwidth on ridiculous statements like that which have little (yeah, right) basis for being rational. Please go to an alternative such as msn.... And to think that the initial part of your post was actually sensible.... Was the latter part a brain fart? Insightful, my dead granny's behind.

    --
    For every present, there is a past
  217. Re:some guy??????? by lifespan · · Score: 0

    QUICK LEGEND
    =============
    Mr Srinivasa Ramanujam............Mr.R
    Pompous Colon Load................PCL
    Extreme-Hypersensitive Types......EHT


    OK, to deposit that PCL and get a 4 Insightful, is truly amazing.

    What's up with that? So they only have names when they're American scientists?
    The submitter did a 1/2assed job, obviously, but he didn't name the student either I doubt he mean't any disrespect to Mr.R when he called him "a self taught math genius". I doubt Mr.R. would be offended by the article's hurried lack of detail. Only EHT's looking to bignote themselves to other EHT's by baselessly whining about USA, would be offended.

    are you just another one of those hicks
    Hey! hicks have feelings too you insensitive clod!

    Turn your Karma modifier option off in preferences. Otherwise you'll only get to read responses that filter thru the strange deluded mind of moderators who give PCL's like the parent post a +4 Insightful.

    --
    -- Howto: Get +5 (1) Whine about M$ (2) Namedrop Gentoo (3) Casually Abuse Mods (4) Namedrop Early Computer Model
  218. Precious princess tanties by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What a load of bollocks.

    If the guy was white (say from Australia) and the link was to "the Aussie math guy" the whole thing would pass un-noticed.

    It says "There's more on the Indian math guy here." It certainly doesn't say "SOME" Indian math guy. There's a subtle difference. "Some' is rather dismissive, whereas "the" means the guy aforementioned.

    Get over it.

  219. Re:Srinivasa ? by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 1

    How about an American being a world-class football (soccer) player such as Tim Howard, goalkeeper for the most famous team in the world -- Manchester United of England.

    He was talking about sports, not games. Soccer is so boring the fans fight each other to liven things up.

    --
    -1 Uncomfortable Truth
  220. Re:so the world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I'm the first to applaud knowledge for knowledge's sake

    No, I don't think you are, based on your comments. And I don't see where you've applauded this at all, let alone applauding it first.

    but I wonder what useful thing could have been accomplished in those man-hours.

    That's not how research works. You find a problem or phenomenon that's interesting to you, and then you go off and study it. You of course can't know ahead of time what will come of it. And sometimes even afterward you can't know what will come of it. The process itself contributes to your knowledge and skills.

  221. SPOILER! hint sum of consecutive odds a square... by mzs · · Score: 1

    Now that I know what you are talking about it is a fun puzzle to solve it turns-out :)

    Take two integers p > 1 and q > 1.

    1 + 3 + ... + 2(p+q) - 1 = (p+q)^2 = p^2 + 2pq + q^2
    1 + 3 + ... + 2(p-q) - 1 = (p-q)^2 = p^2 - 2pq + q^2

    Subtract the bottom from the top:

    2(p-q) - 1 + ... + 2(p+q) - 1 = 4pq

    That is your longer non-trivial way to write 4pq as a sum of consecutive odds.

    The trick is to realize that the sum of consecutive odds is a square. It is a simple formula that people can remember and probably every one proved via induction when they learned induction. The easy way to remember it is like this:

    X

    YZ
    XY

    YYX
    ZZY
    ZZY

    Maybe my lame diagrams above actually make it harder to visualize :)

    But honestly now I remember why I got a degree in CS in addition to Math. It was the small bunch of antisocial pricks in the Math program that made even the worst of the CS types fun to be around in comparison. Why did you go out of your way and attack me with your reply? Look I solved this in no time in my head when I was making the bed this morning. Does that deserve to be an article on ./? No it is a cute puzzle, fun to solve, but please do not present it as if it were some earth shattering discovery in mathematics. And when you make a simple mistake don't start attacking the terminology of someone else when they honestly don't see what you are talking about because of the fact that you poorly characterized the problem. Once I saw what you were talking about I had fun solving it. It was a cute puzzle as it turns-out, one that I gave my wife to work-out this morning.

    Really I am not trying to be mean here. Probably no one has told you yet about how it counts to be nice. If you do not keep it in check what will happen? Is it your goal to be one of the smart-a*s profs that make their students feel like idiots? Wouldn't you rather be one of those that makes them feel intelligent - the kind that let them see that they are learning?

  222. SPOLIER: hint 25±1 squared by mzs · · Score: 1

    Cute puzzle, thanks :)

    26^2 = (25+1)^2 = 25^2 + 2*25 + 1
    24^2 = (25-1)^2 = 25^2 - 2*25 + 1

    Subtract them:

    26^2 - 24^2 = 4*25 = 100

    Again, cute :) Also notice that if you consider the differences between (x±y)^2 in general you have a nice little pattern :)

    Incidentally my first reaction was, "they are 100 apart because 10, 24, 26 is a Pythagorean triple," but I thought there might be more too it than that. Anyway I suppose that was the 'Greek math guy' you were referring to :)

    1. Re:SPOLIER: hint 25±1 squared by farmhick · · Score: 1

      It's funny you mention that you first thought of the Pythagorean principle. That is why I first noticed that the squares of 24 and 26 are exactly 100 apart. Back in high school geometry or trig.

      I couldn't believe any of the other kids couldn't figure this out on their own. It was because they all had those new-fangled scientific calculators, and never figured out the relationships between numbers. They never even figured out the 3, 4, 5 set, which was the basis of half the examples; and 5, 12, 13 was the basis of most of the rest. No wonder they couldn't figure out the radius of a circle whose center is at the origin, and which passes through point (-3, 4).

      Now that I am a parent, I am teaching my daughter these things, even though she is only in the third grade. I don't expect her to remember them right away, but by high school they should be part of her brainwaves.

      --
      I have to stop wasting so much time reading Slashdot. It's interfering with my crystal meth addiction.
  223. Re:SPOILER! hint sum of consecutive odds a square. by Kainaw · · Score: 1

    Now that I know what you are talking about it is a fun puzzle to solve it turns-out :)

    I see you went from p and q to 4pq. I tripped across this little puzzle going from 4pq to p and q. I realized that 4pq is always a sequence of odd numbers, but there isn't an easy way that I know of to determine the start and end of the series without either p or q (only having 4pq). So, I quit that and went on to other things.

    Why did you go out of your way and attack me with your reply?

    I didn't realize that what I said would be taken as an attack. I never said anything like 'Hey idiot...' I just said that you were using what I would call a 'set' and I was using a 'sequence'.

    Does that deserve to be an article on ./?
    Now, you get to the whole point of the post. It was not to announce a great discovery in mathematics. It was to make a joke about having slashdot articles about 'some guy' who solved a math puzzle. The blurb actually referred to him as 'some guy'. I was poking fun at slashdot, not mathematics. I hadn't really intended for anyone to take my simple math puzzle seriously.

    --
    The previous comment is purposely vague and generalized, but all of the facts are completely true.
  224. Was he really French? by Schwarzchild · · Score: 1
    It seems like his birth name was Nabulio Buonaparte (according to Wikipedia) which sounds awfully like Italian.

    So maybe you should say "If I was a short Italian dude from the past where would I go?"

    --

    "sweet dreams are made of this..."

  225. please accept my apology by mzs · · Score: 1

    Now I see how this was a joke and I feel really stupid and embarrassed about that. Sorry about that, I guess I do not have a keen sense of humor. Also I have a - where there should be a + in one place and I call 1 a prime in another, so that serves me right. To be honest, the whole 'Indian math guy' bit bothered me too. At least I got a nice puzzle out of it :)

  226. Bernie Worrell by elucido · · Score: 1

    Bernie Worrell, a modern day music genius could do the same kinds of things.

  227. Re:Don't kid yourself. by cornjchob · · Score: 1

    Excuse me for not being a Linus fanboy, but Linus is NOT in the same league as Einstein. I'm surprised they're mentioned in the same sentence. When Linus dies, nobody will be falling over themselves to dissect his brain.

    It's not the caliber of their accomplishments, rather the respect they get from the /. community and the extent to which their respective names are known here. Your dad may not've tried to unify his own theories with those of Newton (well, maybe after a pint or two), but that doesn't mean you can't hold him in the same esteem. The same goes for anyone you respect.

    --
    We now have confirmed reports from an informed Orange County minister that Ethel is still an active communist.
  228. Re:Don't kid yourself. by cornjchob · · Score: 1

    Only on Slashdot would there be a dude who argues that _Einstein's_ number of discoveries was mediocre ;)

    Relative to other geniuses, of course... *ow!*


    Seriously! I mean, how many patches has Big Al submitted to the kernel? Huh? How many?

    That's what I thought. He must be a crackpot, and therefore, terminated. ...oh. :-P

    --
    We now have confirmed reports from an informed Orange County minister that Ethel is still an active communist.
  229. Re:India is a pseudo-democracy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As the other poster said, this happens here as often as those "man with 12 fingers" stories. Or maybe even less often. The last time this happened, there was a huge media frenzy over it - kinda like that scott peterson case in USA - which kinda shows how less often this happens.

  230. Re:Don't kid yourself. by manojen · · Score: 1

    You don't seem to read the posts carefully either, no wonder you are so ignorant!! There is no Indian grad student involved anywhere!!! The post refers to a mathematical problem posed by the great mathematician Srinivas Ramanujam, one of the greatest minds of the 20th century!!!! And now a grad student called Karl Mahlburg, at the University of Wisconsin in Madison, US, is claiming to have found a solution. If you are unaware of the name of Ramanujam, better remain quiet instead of advertising your ignorance and callous attitude.