Slashdot Mirror


Serenity Trailer Finally Released

ShinyHat writes "Browncoats Rejoice! The trailer for Joss Whedon's Serenity, based on his unjustly cancelled Firefly television series, was released on the QuickTime Movie Trailers page. Thanks to its new September 30th release date it won't be completely overshadowed by Star Wars. Talk is, if the movie does well enough, Universal will pick it up for a second and third installment." (As promised.)

437 comments

  1. My Girlfriend... by Spytap · · Score: 4, Funny

    My girlfriend has been "geeking out" (her words, not mine) over the new website all day. She's even more excited about this than I am.

    Note to self: she's a keeper ;)

    1. Re:My Girlfriend... by Umbral+Blot · · Score: 1

      Mine too: http://lunarflight.europic.net/index.html Now if I could only get her into programming.

    2. Re:My Girlfriend... by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      sounds to me like your girlfriend is the geek version of sailor moon using phrases like that... maybe she's not quite so much of a keeper..

      --
      I like muppets.
    3. Re:My Girlfriend... by necrofluxneo · · Score: 0

      Okay buddy, you should have known that making any mention of a girlfriend on slashdot requires the accompaniment of pics - if only to help us as a group believe that we too may one day have a female of our own!

    4. Re:My Girlfriend... by phritz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I know what you mean, man ... the gf called me, breathless, to tell me to download the trailer. I have to give Joss big props - If you need a way to get your non-geek girlfriend to be excited about spaceships and hot girls in tight outfits doing acrobatics, you can't go wrong with Firefly and Buffy.

    5. Re:My Girlfriend... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Actually geeking out is a rather common term for smoking crack.

    6. Re:My Girlfriend... by SwordRaven · · Score: 0

      In Shadowrun, to Geek somebody is to kill them. So perhaps 'geeking out' could be interpreted as going on a murderous rampage.

    7. Re:My Girlfriend... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does she have a sister?

    8. Re:My Girlfriend... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, mine is a degreed engineer who, upon seeing the first episode, grabbed my arm to exclaim,"There's no sound, like it really would be in space".

      So there.

    9. Re:My Girlfriend... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If you need a way to get your non-geek girlfriend to be excited about spaceships and hot girls in tight outfits doing acrobatics, you can't go wrong with Firefly and Buffy.

      My wife started crying when the VCR missed a new episode of Buffy. I found it online no trouble, but told her I'd been thinking about buying a ReplyTV (expensive then). She loves the ReplayTV. The only problem was that she watched Buffy reruns day and night and about half the hard disk was dedicated to Buffy. Now she has the Buffy DVDs, but mostly watches CSI type brain rot.

    10. Re:My Girlfriend... by butterwise · · Score: 1

      What is this "girlfriend" of which you speak?

      --
      If a baby duck is a "duckling," why would anyone want to eat "dumplings?"
  2. everything has a downside by Fjandinn · · Score: 0, Troll

    I'm sitting on mine

  3. DVD quality XVID version by Gossi · · Score: 5, Informative
    1. Re:DVD quality XVID version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you OP Quick time is the devil! No I DO NOT want to install Itunes....BAH!

    2. Re:DVD quality XVID version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone should put up a torrent of this while the server is still alive.

    3. Re:DVD quality XVID version by Gossi · · Score: 1

      Anybody is welcome to, but the server should stay up.

    4. Re:DVD quality XVID version by Entropy · · Score: 1

      THANK YOU!

      THANK YOU!

      THANK YOU!

      HOLY SHIT THANK YOU!

      All I can say is ... WOW! HOLY SHIT WOW!

      "Let's be badguys" - and HOLY SEXY River !

      --
      The sea changes color, but the sea does not change.
    5. Re:DVD quality XVID version by As+Seen+On+TV · · Score: 1

      "DVD quality" my ass. I mean, the effort you put into it was neat and all, but that file looks like crap. One megabit per second is not enough at that size and with that particular codec.

    6. Re:DVD quality XVID version by Anubis350 · · Score: 1

      thank you and uni bandwidth. getting 640KB/sec down. yay!

      --
      "goodbye and hello, as always" ~Prince Corwin, from Zelazny's Amber series
    7. Re:DVD quality XVID version by Gossi · · Score: 1

      Every night I dream of megabits,
      in codecs,
      Oh yeah.

    8. Re:DVD quality XVID version by Rune+Berge · · Score: 1

      Impressive! Posted almost at the top on Slashdot, and I still get 180kB/s.

    9. Re:DVD quality XVID version by Gossi · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Incase anybody is wondering, serving this used 129gb of bandwidth in the first hour alone.

    10. Re:DVD quality XVID version by Refrag · · Score: 1

      Apple has now made a high definition Serenity trailer available (for download!) for use with Quicktime 7.

      --
      I have a website. It's about Macs.
  4. Serenity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NOW!

    SERENITY NOW!

    Finally :)

    1. Re:Serenity by meta.chris · · Score: 1

      Serenity now, Insanity later

    2. Re:Serenity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfotunately, it is Insanity now, Serenity later!

  5. Obligatory... by gotgenes · · Score: 5, Funny

    Serenity now!!!

    --
    It's such a fine line between stupid and clever.
    1. Re:Obligatory... by Necrobruiser · · Score: 1

      No, September 30.

      --
      "I planned within my means and got a fixed rate mortgage, so where's MY bailout?" -cafepress
    2. Re:Obligatory... by stjobe · · Score: 1

      September 30? But I want it NOW! ;)

      --
      "Total destruction the only solution" - Bob Marley
  6. re by computerme · · Score: 1

    I watched the show when it was on the air but was not that into it. But hey it was scifi on TV and the only other scifi worthy of watching was Farscape/.

    I recently rented the whole series via netflix and enjoyed it even more the 2nd time around...

    Looks good. I'll definately buy a ticket.

    1. Re:re by Dastardly · · Score: 1

      I recently rented the whole series via netflix and enjoyed it even more the 2nd time around...

      It helps to watch it in order.

  7. linux?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    so does someone want to help me watch this on my linux laptop? usually i have had good luck with viewing the source and finding a link to the actually .mov file and using wget to download it and then playing it in mplayer.. but that doesn't seem to give me anything of value...
    thanks

    1. Re:linux?? by Linegod · · Score: 1

      Just use mplayer to play the link, or read the error output from mplayer to find the name of the _actual_ file to download (have to make you do some work....)

      --
      -- I care not for your foolish signatures.
    2. Re:linux?? by Virtex · · Score: 1

      You can download the trailer with the URL:

      http://movies.apple.com/movies/universal/serenit y/ serenity_m480.mov

      then just use mplayer to watch it.

      --
      For every post, there is an equal and opposite re-post.
    3. Re:linux?? by jsight · · Score: 1

      MPlayer has a browser plugin that seemed to work fine here (mplayer 1.0_pre6).

  8. Direct Link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
    1. Re:Direct Link by Ying+Hu · · Score: 1

      You rock!

    2. Re:Direct Link by LuxFX · · Score: 1

      Full screen here:
      http://movies.apple.com/movies/universal/se renity/ serenity_ifs2.mov

      --
      Punctanym: alternate spelling of words using punctuation or numerals in place of some or all of its letters; see 'leet'
    3. Re:Direct Link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By putting "<URL:" in front of the URL, and ">" after the URL, you can make an actual link: http://movies.apple.com/movies/universal/serenity/ serenity_ifs2.mov
      This also fixes the "embedded space" problem.

  9. Holy Crap by Golias · · Score: 4, Interesting

    That trailer makes the Star Wars III trailer look like a stupid cartoon.

    I'm so jacked up to see this, I'll probably skip "Revenge of the Sith" entirely and see "Serenity" one extra time with the eight bucks I save!

    --

    Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    1. Re:Holy Crap by GersonK · · Score: 5, Funny

      That trailer makes the Star Wars III trailer look like a stupid cartoon.

      But then, an episode of Clutch Cargo would also have that effect.

    2. Re:Holy Crap by shadowbearer · · Score: 1

      I'm going to see both, but after seeing that trailer, I have a feeling which one I'll buy on DVD first ;-); sorry George...

      !! & !

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    3. Re:Holy Crap by harlows_monkeys · · Score: 2, Interesting
      That trailer makes the Star Wars III trailer look like a stupid cartoon

      I noticed that. The sets and backgrounds in Serenity have striking contrasts and colors that make then visually interesting, yet they also seem believable in a way that few science fiction movies manage. Too often, things stand out as being different in order to look "futurey". Star Wars is full of this, especially the latest episodes.

    4. Re:Holy Crap by DavidTC · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Firefly isn't trying to be 'intelligent', if by intelligent you actually mean 'philosophical'.

      Trust me, Joss has already gone there. He's out of philosophical points to make. He made them in his morality plays about good and evil called Buffy and Angel. Take a position on free will, on good and evil, on the nature of reality, on the ends justifying the means, on vengence vs. justice, on love, on death...and you will find something supportive of that position in Buffy or Angel, and something unsupportive of it.

      Anf Firefly not particularly 'good' sci-fi, if by good sci-fi you mean 'hard'. Sure, his ships don't make sounds in space, but on the other hand, no explaination is given of where all these new worlds came from, and how far apart they are, or if ships go FTL, or even what their fuel is. There's no 'This is how the universe works', because none of the characters actually care about that, anymore than we care about how cars work. (Well, Kaylee, the mechanic, cares, but it's not like she'd have a reason to try to explain it.)

      Firefly tries, and succeeds amazingly, at being good drama. With letter-perfect characterizations and amazing plots, and what was shaping up to be an interesting storyline before it was summarily canceled..

      Firefly is perfect sci-fi, if you think sci-fi is 'drama set in a universe where differences in science affect the characters and how they act'. It's pretty crappy if your idea of sci-fi is Star Trek Technical Manuals. It's pretty crappy if you go too far the other way and your idea of good sci-fi is the ramifications of your entire life being a lie, aka, The Matrix. (If you want that from Whedon, the Buffy episodes are 'The Real Me' and 'Normal Again' and the entire Connor arc on Angel. And 'Superstar' on Buffy, but that's more a joke than a serious look at it.)

      Don't believe the trailer. Three kinds of people are going to watch this movie: Those who've seen the shows, those who watch action movies, and those who watch every sci-fi movie. The first need no ads (Considering the amount of work it was to be a Firefly fan in the first place, they probably build a damn theater if one wasn't handy.) and the third you could show just a drawing of a space ship and say 'Come watch ship fly in space' as the ad copy. The trailer is aimed at the second group, who will get excited by the ad.

      If you want to know if it will be worth it, download 'Serenity', the first episode, and watch it. Might want to start the second downloading while the first is coming in.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    5. Re:Holy Crap by DavidTC · · Score: 1
      I have never seen Event Horizon or Alien 3.

      However, the worse sci-fi film ever made is, in fact, Supernova.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    6. Re:Holy Crap by JudgeFurious · · Score: 1

      No it doesn't, that's just a silly thing to say. Go ahead and skip SW:ROTS if you want, that's probably not a bad idea actually, just don't make like the trailer for it wasn't every bit as badass looking as this. That's what trailers do. Star Wars trailers are particularly good at it too.

      The only real difference here is that you know, without a doubt that the SW:ROTS trailer has a pretty good chance of being ten times cooler than the entire film (it's probably a huge lie) while the Serenity trailer could actually reflect how cool the rest of the movie is going to be.

      --
      Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
    7. Re:Holy Crap by NanoGator · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "I'm so jacked up to see this, I'll probably skip "Revenge of the Sith" entirely and see "Serenity" one extra time with the eight bucks I save!"

      Question: Is this trailer like a LOT more interesting if you watched the show?

      I ask because I never caught it, and I'm not seeing the big whoop-de-fuck that everybody else is. As the trailer stands, it actually looks like mediochre sci-fi, to me.

      I'm not posting this to troll. I'm just trying to understand what it is I'm missing that's preventing me from getting worked up like everybody else.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    8. Re:Holy Crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      "If you want to know if it will be worth it, download 'Serenity', the first episode, and watch it. Might want to start the second downloading while the first is coming in."

      Hell no, *buy* the fricking DVD. Honestly, you probably spend $20 every time you go out for a meal. "I like SF, so I download episodes of what I could otherwise buy" really doesn't cut it as a sustainable attitude. Because the big studios simply won't be in a mood to release good SF if they never learn that it pays. Sad truth, but that's the way capitalism works.

    9. Re:Holy Crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Question: Is this trailer like a LOT more interesting if you watched the show?

      I guess... maybe :)

      It represents more Firefly goodness - so if you enjoyed the show, that's enough by itself to make the trailer seem incredible.

      It also represents a culmination of plot elements that were progressing in the series - again, that raises excitement.

      Rest assured, it won't be mediocre sci-fi though. I suggest you rent or borrow the series, and give it a go. If you enjoy that, you'll love the film :) If not - it'll just be a difference in tastes, and at least you'll have an idea of what the fans saw in the show.

    10. Re:Holy Crap by seasleepy · · Score: 1

      Firefly isn't trying to be 'intelligent', if by intelligent you actually mean 'philosophical'.

      Buh? What about Objects in Space (aka "Joss Whedon Presents Existentialism On Ice")?

      Other than that though, I do agree with you.

    11. Re:Holy Crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The thing about Firefly that has people so juiced is that it's not just typical sci-fi. Nor is it just typical western.

      If "Star Trek" was indeed "Wagon Train in Space" then "Firefly" was fuckin' "The Searchers" in space!

      In other words: It's not just a western dressed up as science fiction. It's a really good western dressed up as science fiction.

      Mind you, if you have not seen "The Searchers" then forget about all this talk about Star Wars, Firefly, and other popcorn faire, and go rent it. Now. Stop what you are doing, shut down the computer and rent it! It's a dark fuckin' movie gets into the evil side of the human psyche in a way that David Lynch has spent his entire career chasing after and coming up short on.

    12. Re:Holy Crap by Moofie · · Score: 1

      "Is this trailer like a LOT more interesting if you watched the show?"

      Yeah. A lot.

      Might not be to your taste, but it's the best TV show I've seen since Babylon 5. (Although Battlestar Galactica has definite possibilities...)

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    13. Re:Holy Crap by Moofie · · Score: 1

      I'd like to vote for Wing Commander about a million times.

      My favorite scene was when the space bulldozer pushed the crippled fighter plane not into the hangar, but off the side of the runway. And it FELL.

      And I thought that John Travolta in Battlefield Earth was a more convincing giant-cat-alien-guy.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    14. Re:Holy Crap by drb_chimaera · · Score: 1

      Correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm sure I remember the original airings of the first episode or two had a credit sequence that described the firefly universe as a single system of many habitable planets but that sequence got ditched never to be seen again. Good thing too as it was a bit daft...

      But yeah - the trailer looks great.

    15. Re:Holy Crap by valkoinen · · Score: 2
      If you want to know if it will be worth it, download 'Serenity', the first episode, and watch it. Might want to start the second downloading while the first is coming in.


      Or better yet, if you like it, order the DVD box.
    16. Re:Holy Crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd like to vote for Wing Commander about a million times.

      Yes, it sucked big time. But come on, Saffron Burrows was *hot*.

    17. Re:Holy Crap by RupW · · Score: 1

      I ask because I never caught it, and I'm not seeing the big whoop-de-fuck that everybody else is. As the trailer stands, it actually looks like mediochre sci-fi, to me.

      I agree - and I'm a fan of the show. I wasn't impressed by the trailer. I watched it a few times, though, and I got more into it after the first view. If this was my first exposure to Serenity and I'd seen the trailer exactly once I don't think I'd need to go see it.

      My biggest disappointment was some of the acting (or maybe direction) didn't convince. The shows were pretty flawless so maybe I was expecting too much. Mal, the captain, is supposed to be a hard-ass here but he played it too dead. Wash, the pilot, is usually very funny but his one line here ("oh god, oh god, we're all going to die") fell totally flat - wrong tone and too clear, as if it'd been recorded on a soundstage not a starship in distress. River's final kick? Please, *NO* power at all.

      Now there were a lot of good lines and moments, too - good to see Jayne's still on form - and I will still go see the film. But I feel let down by the trailer.

      Reading elsewhere the film still isn't finished (they're putting on ten special showings of a still unfinished cut next month) so hopefully they can still polish some of the edges.

    18. Re:Holy Crap by ajs · · Score: 1

      " That trailer makes the Star Wars III trailer look like a stupid cartoon."

      Considering that the stupid cartoons made the third movie seem like it almost might be cool, I suppose that's ok... ;-)

      Seriously, I'm looking forward to both movies this year. SW3 because it has a (slim) chance of being the payoff that makes 1 and 2 worth the time and money spent, and Serenity because I want Fox to have a good long think about the chance they ruined. >:-)

    19. Re:Holy Crap by aichpvee · · Score: 1

      It really was nice of them to push it back to September. This way "Revenge of the Sith" won't be completely overshadowed.

      --
      The Farewell Tour II
    20. Re:Holy Crap by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      People aren't out there thinking 'I wonder if this movie is worth 8 dollars' and willing to rush out ad spend 20 dollars so they can find out. That makes no sense.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    21. Re:Holy Crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That makes no sense.

      And your incitement to piracy makes federal jail time. Probably.

    22. Re:Holy Crap by DavidTC · · Score: 1
      Okay, it's not normally trying to be intelligent. ;)

      Or let's just say, there are no deep concepts or metaphors underlying the series, besides the obvious 'the american west after the civil war' metaphor. There's no responsiblity of the world, no attempt at redemption, no 'This is what it means to be a (woman|man) in the universe and this is the kinds of choices you make.'

      Unlike his other shows, which were about those things.

      Actually, it's possible that, as time went by, we'd see metaphors like that (This is what it means to be a team, maybe?), so I guess it's more accurate to say there were no obvious deep metaphors in the bits we saw. ;) Buffy managed to get there in 11 episodes ('Giles, I don't want to die.'), and Angel got there in one, but it could take longer this time.

      My point was, for people looking for 'intelligent' sci-fi, to just get the Buffy and Angels DVDs and stop expecting it from this movie. Although I have a feeling that the people who proudly talk about 'intelligent' sci-fi are exactly the people who wouldn't touch Buffy with a ten-foot pole solely because the name isn't pretentious enough. Which is probably a good thing.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    23. Re:Holy Crap by smchris · · Score: 1

      Yup. Good sci fi should elaborate on the effects of the hardware universe upon culture. Reason I can't spit on Dark Angel was the one episode of the kids forming their own mythology in the dorm as a new, mutant race.

    24. Re:Holy Crap by Craig_P92669 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I dunno, I thought the part where R2 got Padme to pee on the EPT stick was pretty good.

      --
      http://xs4.xs.to/pics/04481/p556222.gif
    25. Re:Holy Crap by Khelder · · Score: 0, Troll

      I've seen people comment before about the amazing characterization, acting, and drama in Firefly. I saw all the eps that aired and I just don't see it.

      I want to like Firefly. I loved Buffy and liked Angel very much. But in terms of characterization, I think Firefly is nowhere near Farscape (and even second place to Stargate SG-1, but maybe that's only because of the difference in length of series). And as far as drama, Firefly doesn't come close to Battlestar Galactica (the new one, of course :) ) or Babylon 5.

      It's weird to me because people who to like so many things I like say Firefly is/was great. But I just don't see it.

      I guess there's no accounting for taste.

    26. Re:Holy Crap by Cat_Byte · · Score: 1
      Yeah I think that is what killed the original Battlestar Galactica. Everywhere they went, even asteroids, had inhabitants. I still bought the whole set on DVD though ;)

      On a related note, anyone ever notice that the only person they said "by your command" to on the first season of the new one was one of the Sharon Clones on Ragnar station?

      --
      Two roads diverged in a wood, and I - I took the one the bus load of girls just went down.
    27. Re:Holy Crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Kaylee cares because, as the original engineer on the ship said... "Engines make her hot".
      I agree with you about the trailer, and who it's aimed at. We know the "Firefly" fans will go as many times as they can afford (since it's been said that if the movie does well on its opening weekend, there will be at least two more movies). This wasn't a trailer for fans... most of the characters got no lines at all, and Book wasn't even seen. Most of the trailer was River kicking butt and catchy lines.
      (Quoting David TC) "Well, Kaylee, the mechanic, cares, but it's not like she'd have a reason to try to explain it."
      Another quote: "Don't believe the trailer. Three kinds of people are going to watch this movie: Those who've seen the shows, those who watch action movies, and those who watch every sci-fi movie. The first need no ads (Considering the amount of work it was to be a Firefly fan in the first place, they probably build a damn theater if one wasn't handy.) and the third you could show just a drawing of a space ship and say 'Come watch ship fly in space' as the ad copy. The trailer is aimed at the second group, who will get excited by the ad."

    28. Re:Holy Crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      FYI, The Searchers is in a.b.vcd.westerns right now.

    29. Re:Holy Crap by JJ · · Score: 1

      Okay, what moron moderated this idiot up?

      --
      So long and thanks for all the fish . . . !!!
    30. Re:Holy Crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Event Horizon was a horrible, bad, ugly, miserable ripoff of Solaris (the original, as the Clooney remake wasn't out when Event Horizon was made).

      The movie had some interesting imagery, but it was one of those horror movies that refuse to operate by any known set of rules, so just ends up lacking any sort of tension or, well, horror.

    31. Re:Holy Crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okay, what moron moderated this idiot up?

      Wasn't me, but it's intersting in a "here's what a non-fan thinks" kind-of-way.

      Don't sneer at him for not taking the party line :-p

    32. Re:Holy Crap by AaronLawrence · · Score: 1

      I think the GP is right. Whereas Star Wars has pretty graphics, but appears to have the same fairly dull acting and lines, Serenity looks to be alive with actual fun, characters and script... on top of having some pretty nice looking CG.

      --
      For every expert, there is an equal and opposite expert. - Arthur C. Clarke
    33. Re:Holy Crap by superflippy · · Score: 2

      I'm a fan of the show, and I also thought the trailer was just OK until the final 5 seconds.

      BOUNTY HUNTER: I am unarmed.
      MAL: Good. *shoots*
      ME: Awesome!

      The scene in - I think - The Train Job where they spaced the guy who was threatening to track them down and kill them was one of my favorites, and this reminded me of that. I love it when the characters do the obvious, most expedient thing instead of doing whatever will create the most contrived drama.

      --
      Your fantasies contain the seeds of important concepts.
    34. Re:Holy Crap by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      Telling people to break the law isn't illegal in the US, dumbass.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    35. Re:Holy Crap by Golias · · Score: 1

      Those intro sequences were never supposed to be part of the show, and were tacked on at the last minute because FOX screwed up the order the shows were broadcast in.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    36. Re:Holy Crap by DavidTC · · Score: 1
      You saw the episodes as they aired? In that order?

      Well, that was half your problem, right there. Fox aired them in a nonsensical order. Of course you can't watch the characters evolve.

      Borrow a DVD from a friend and watch Serenity, the actual first episode. You know, where it explains everything that's going on and who everyone is. That, for reference, was the episode that aired last, and it's very possible you missed it, considering how irregular the airings of Firefly were.

      And you definitely missed the three episodes that never aired.

      Once you watch all the episodes in order, then you get to comment on characterization. ;)

      And us fans aren't fanatics who insist Firefly is the best thing since sliced bread. Farscape had declining ratings and high production costs, and it at least got a miniseries send off. BSG is still going strong. But I, for example, love Farscape and BSG too, and if you gave me a choise of one more year of one series (Pretending BSG had been cancelled.), I have no idea which one I'd pick.

      Neither of those, however, were killed thanks to Fox being pure evil and apparently delibrately sabatoging the series. By not giving Firefly respect, a correct episode order (and not preempting it randomly), and any ads, Fox basically did the same thing to it, as, well, Futurama, another show with a proven creator.

      Non-fans don't quite realize how poorly Firefly was treated. Fox treats all their sci-fi shows like that, though, so it's not surprising.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    37. Re:Holy Crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Umm...the acting from Mal and Wash was dead on with what they did in the show. Especially Wash's one-liner at the end.

      When has Wash freaked out over a piloting thing? He's always dry and sarcastic, especially when forcasting doom. Its only in situations when he's threatend with imminent physical violence that he loses his cool, never with piloting. I can't remember his exact line prior to the one you quoted, but it was something like:

      Wash: "Well, this could be interesting."

      Mal: "Interesting how?"

      Wash, deadpanned: "(Interesting like: )Oh god oh god, we're all gonna die?"

      Its the same dry comedy Wash has always had. It was *supposed* to be clear, and not at all a scream from the pilot of a starship in distress.

      And Mal has always been a surface hardass with a soft spot for certain stuff like his crew, and he's also got that dry humor and sometimes callous disregard for stuff he dislikes. He also doesn't lose his cool in physical violence situations, but comes close sometimes when being subjected to Wash's flying.

      Its what made the series so damned funny to begin with.

    38. Re:Holy Crap by RupW · · Score: 1

      Umm...the acting from Mal and Wash was dead on with what they did in the show. Especially Wash's one-liner at the end.

      Mal changed. Yeah, he started off like he was in the trailer but towards the end he was more human.

      IMO the last half of the series was *much* better than the first half, and that's probably just better characterisation.

      When has Wash freaked out over a piloting thing? He's always dry and sarcastic, especially when forcasting doom.

      OK, but he didn't really go for the sarcastic in that line, he just sort of spoke it. If there's impending doom, he should be concentrating on flying the thing too and he should look like he's concentrating and it should show in his voice. If you look at Wash in the early group shots in the trailer he's clearly concentrating on flying the thing.

      Anyway, it didn't work for me at least. And I don't think the acoustics worked either in that scene, it didn't feel real.

    39. Re:Holy Crap by MotherInferior · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I do see your point, but I think you might be confusing intelligent with didactic. There are any number of deep concepts underlying the series.

      • Continuity of class structures over time
      • Universal nature of frontier culture
      • The ineffective nature of technology on the core problems that face mankind. (as opposed to Star Trek's "In the future we'll all shit flower petals and rainbows! Except for the Klingons and Borg... we still need bad guys, you understand."
      • The effect of scarcity and want on common morality and civility.
      Mr. Wheadon just didn't use the series as allegory thinly veiled in laser beams and photon carbonificators like most other sci-fi shows have (Gallactica being the canonical example). He wanted to tell a story, nothing more, but in telling a story as honestly and thoroughly as you can, you're going to expose a philosophical framework, which he did pretty darned well, IMO.
    40. Re:Holy Crap by RikF · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I thought the "we're all going to die" line was delivered beautifully. It's a very dry follow up to the previous 2 lines which went something like (I'm a work and I'll get odd looks if I pop my headphones on to check!)

      "This could get interesting"
      "Define interesting"
      "oh god, oh god, we're all going to die"

      so as a dry reply I think it works very well.

      RikF

      --
      In Soviet Russia you own your cat
    41. Re: Holy Crap by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1


      > That trailer makes the Star Wars III trailer look like a stupid cartoon.

      Since when did Star Wars need any help looking like a stupid cartoon?

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    42. Re:Holy Crap by DavidTC · · Score: 2, Interesting
      No, I'm not confusing it, I'm responding to people who think 'The Matrix' was intelligent sci-fi, because, ooo, we're all really living in a computer simulation! Man, that really makes you think...if you've never had any exposure to real science fiction at all. ;) Hell, Red Dwarf did that.

      I don't see your fourth point at all, I think it's actually the second point...morality and civility in a frontier.

      And disagree with your third, I think the reason technology is 'ineffective' is because the government wants it to be so. The last time you let poor people have high tech, they started a war. From what little we've seen of the non-frontier, it looks like quite a lot of core problems have been solved. The core 'problem' is, in fact, the malcontents who refuse to fit in and instead 'head west'.

      But, yes, there was a philosophical framework framework there. Interestingly enough, it isn't the same one as in Buffy and Angel, and that was obvious the second Mal threw that guy into their engine.

      Although it somewhat hard to tell, because the viewpoint is completely different...people who are vigilantes against evil, vs. the losers in a war who aren't trying to do anything.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    43. Re:Holy Crap by Golias · · Score: 1

      IMO the last half of the series was *much* better than the first half, and that's probably just better characterisation.

      I agree that the show got better as it went along, but I also found that, after seeing the entire run of the series, early episodes like "The Train Job" became far more entertaining to me.

      The fun of the series relies heavilly on character-driven humor, which always works better after you get to know the characters.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    44. Re:Holy Crap by Golias · · Score: 1

      Funniest comment I've seen on Slashdot all month. Thanks. Oh, and you owe me a keyboard.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    45. Re:Holy Crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Modded down as a troll for reminding people not to feed trolls.

      Sign me up for the club which says Slashdot moderation is broken and should be purged.

    46. Re:Holy Crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you're one of the dumbfucks that mods someone down because their opinion doesn't agree with yours?

      Fuck you, it's shitheads like you that ruin the moderation system. May you never receive another mod point again.

    47. Re:Holy Crap by TheoGB · · Score: 1

      Star Wars: The new Slashdot Microsoft?

      Well, maybe not quite. ;-)

      While I have very little hope Episode III will be any good, its trailers are fucking fantastic, as is this Serenity one, though the Serenity SFX didn't look like they could compare to the space shots in Ep III.

      Personally I'll see both. The thought of a tenner lasting between May and September with all those pubs and chocolate bars out there seems unlikely. :-/

    48. Re:Holy Crap by AussieVamp2 · · Score: 1

      you missed Space Truckers then?

    49. Re:Holy Crap by PurplePhase · · Score: 1

      ..looks like mediochre sci-fi, to me.

      Very little of this trailer was ochre, but none of the TV episodes were mediocre.

      YMMV,

      8-PP

    50. Re:Holy Crap by JJ · · Score: 1

      Take a look at my political posts which get shredded for being pro-Bush.

      --
      So long and thanks for all the fish . . . !!!
    51. Re:Holy Crap by MotherInferior · · Score: 1

      Good points. Yes, the fourth point, on reflection, is pretty much a subset of the second, but it wouldn't be a stretch to separate the two when taking the whole of the Firefly universe into account, both the fabulously wealthy Earth-centric core and the "malcontents," as you refer to them, on the rim.

      I'm not quite sure what you're saying about my third point. Are you disagreeing with the truth of it, or simply refuting that the series expounds that point of view? I happen to think that the series makes it pretty clear that in Mr. Whedon's universe, a Firefly engine == a horse == covered wagon == jump gate == greyhound bus. The difference is only in scale and time period. There are no instant food devices, no holodecks.. the same want and need and emotional scars that all pilgrims and malcontents deal with as a result of their (sometimes self-imposed) exile exist irrespective of how fast their method of transportation is. Even with fabulous advances in technology, poor folk still get screwed, and it's still dog eat dog, sans those other most invaluable qualities, hope and mercy. Hope and mercy don't need technology to work their magic; they just need the will and heart to do them.

      Maybe I'm reading too much into the subtext, but that's what I see in the series.

    52. Re:Holy Crap by mink · · Score: 1

      It was not a rip off of solaris. It was just "Hellraiser in space". Frankly Hellraiser: Bloodlines (the actual hellraiser in space) was a better story.

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
  10. And the Angels sung... by Bananatree3 · · Score: 3, Funny
    Haaaalleeeeeluujah! Haaaalleeeeeluujah! hallelujah! hallelujah! halleluuuuuujah!

    ohhh finally, Serenity has come, Serenity has come. Ohhhhhh finally, Serenity has come, and a kingdom come!

    1. Re:And the Angels sung... by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      If serenity has finally come, then shouldn't you be - oh, I don't know - serene?

  11. Fullscreen Version by CloudsSpaz · · Score: 5, Informative
    1. Re:Fullscreen Version by Ying+Hu · · Score: 1

      Awesome! You're the man!

  12. Firefly low ratings by augustz · · Score: 1

    "Unjust" is a subjective term. I'm a fan of a just society as most folks are, and so interested to understand the depth of injustice suffered by the group putting on the show.

    But a botched delivery by the powers that be of a new series, leading to low ratings is not unjust. It is just a screwup it would seem.

    When the new McFish Griddle Whopper flops because of poor marketing, is that also unjust to the McFish Griddle Whopper researcher? Seems like a stretch.

    Just my 2 cents.

    1. Re:Firefly low ratings by cvas · · Score: 1
      When the new McFish Griddle Whopper flops because of poor marketing, is that also unjust to the McFish Griddle Whopper researcher? Seems like a stretch


      Just before this you said that "'Unjust' is a subjective term", so by your definition it is not a stretch if that is the way the person describing it feels. It also means that it is appropriate for the article's blurb which was written by a fan and gives his opinion.

      Want your change for the 2 cents?
    2. Re:Firefly low ratings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When the new McFish Griddle Whopper flops because of poor marketing

      I don't know what the hell a McFish Griddle Whopper is, but the McFish was an outstounding success and is still seen on the McDonnald's menu today with it's 1/2 slice of cheese. Much research went into the 1/2 slice of cheese to achieve the perfect texture and it got catholics in there when it was still in fashion to eat fish every friday rather that just good friday.

      To this day it's one the only things I would order from McDonnalds. But we're not talking McPizza here, we're talking about a series by a gent who did Buffy and Angel for crying out loud... someone with a good track record that got his series killed mid season.

    3. Re:Firefly low ratings by sean.geek.nz · · Score: 1

      TANJ

    4. Re:Firefly low ratings by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      "Unjust" is a subjective term. I'm a fan of a just society as most folks are, and so interested to understand the depth of injustice suffered by the group putting on the show.
      But a botched delivery by the powers that be of a new series, leading to low ratings is not unjust. It is just a screwup it would seem.


      How about airing it, say, 3 times in a row at the time advertised, would that have been "just"?

      Because I think airing it at ungodly hours such as "12:07am" and "12:14am" or "not at all" when they advertise it at 8pm and THEN declaring "due to low rating we'll cancel it" quite unjust.

      "Stop hitting yourself", the bully says, and you watch, thinking "yeah, that's a fair statement".

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    5. Re:Firefly low ratings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      There are two groups here. There are the creators of the show and the networks. It's the networks that were unjust to the creators by playing the serious out of order and at a known bad time slot.

      You are right, if you treat them as one entity, it's self inflicted and not unjust, but that totally ignores how TV programs are really made and distributed.

  13. Cheesy? by saikou · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    I might be wrong, but looks kinda cheesy, like one of those "Direct to Video" releases. Plus... A damsel in distress, and empire in pursuit. Where's the robot with "Help me, *static*! You're my only hope!". Knowle Rohrer. "This is going to be interesting" in trailer. Waaaahh... *runs away*

    1. Re:Cheesy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Why should it be any better than the show that spawned it.

    2. Re:Cheesy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But the Damsel in Distress can clearly kick butt, and is much more interesting than Leia as anyone who saw the TV show can attest.
      I doubt the trailer, awesome as it is, does justice to the movie.

    3. Re:Cheesy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'm assuming you're referring to River - which any Firefly can tell you is not a damsel in distress. She can take care of herself just fine actually.

    4. Re:Cheesy? by snol · · Score: 1

      The trailer doesn't seem much like the show, but they're always a bit too flashy. I'm hoping the trailer will have more of the atmosphere of the show, though the plot looks really good.

    5. Re:Cheesy? by Lord_Slepnir · · Score: 3, Funny

      Ironically, Her Brother is more of a 'Damsel in Distress'

    6. Re:Cheesy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm. I changed my settings so I could read all the comments on this topic as I thought I might find some insight in to what will hopefully be a wonderful movie...

      Instead, I find bigoted, homophobic comments from some inbred retard that thought they'd try (but fail) to be amusing on a topic that they have no interest in.

      You're going to be the kind of person that when you grow up (physically, not mentally, obviously) you'll write letters to TV stations complaining that what you saw offended you because you were too stupid to figure out how to change the channel.

      And people wonder why /. has been going downhill of late?

      - The Rabbi T. White (Sorry for posting as AC... stupid work computers and their restrictiveness).

    7. Re:Cheesy? by earthbound+kid · · Score: 1

      Ironically, No one know what "Irony" means any more. Or How to capitalize. /grammar nazi

    8. Re:Cheesy? by Scrameustache · · Score: 4, Informative

      River - which any Firefly can tell you is not a damsel in distress. She can take care of herself just fine actually.

      Actually, no she can't. She's insane and needs constant medical attention supervision so that she will not harm herself or others.

      Her brother threw away all he had to save this damsel.
      The fact that she's a psychic supersoldier in potentia doesn't make her any less vulnarable in the state she was in through the first episodes.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    9. Re:Cheesy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      THIS is why I browse at -1.

    10. Re:Cheesy? by TheGax · · Score: 1

      "No force in the 'verse can stop me."

      (Or something like that...)

    11. Re:Cheesy? by Various+Assortments · · Score: 1

      It means things made out of iron. Duh.

  14. uuuuuu...huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why is there suddenly sounds in space?!?

    1. Re:uuuuuu...huh? by Spad · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Good question - one of the things I liked about Firefly was the fact that space was silent and you didn't have the sound of laser blasts and explosions for "effect", which is no doubt why they've been added to the film (and to help those who don't get the whole "no sound in space" thing).

    2. Re:uuuuuu...huh? by arodland · · Score: 1

      (+1, On topic)

    3. Re:uuuuuu...huh? by -Harlequin- · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I think there is a fair chance that the sounds are just in the trailer. Trailers have to be flashy and exciting, and appeal to people who have never seen the show, and that means sound fx.

      Once they're in the cinema watching the movie, THEN you have the time to introduce them to a world where space is silent and six-shooters go hand in hand with spaceships. Trying to do that in a trailer is risky. This is more of a USA thing, trailers elsewhere are a bit less action-focused. (The "Crouching Tiger Hidden Dragon DVD has the US trailer in addition to the normal trailer, watch them one after the other and you might think they're different movies :-)

    4. Re:uuuuuu...huh? by Ravadill · · Score: 1

      Because when it comes down to it, most of us would rather have sweet explosions and bass while watching battles in space than sit there listening to silence for half the movie... If you're really that worried about realism in a movie, maybe you should stick to documentaries?

    5. Re:uuuuuu...huh? by AnFraX · · Score: 1

      The electro-magnetic waves created by energy-weapons and drives are so powerful they cause all metal in the near vicinity to reverberate. Or atleast that is my explanation for it.

    6. Re:uuuuuu...huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It looks like most of the sound in space in the trailer comes when the camera view is inside a ship.

      This is what the show did; whenever the viewer was inside, then you would hear sounds; engines, explosions, etc. But the outside views are silent. Occasionally, there was music , but it was apparent that the music is not really part of the scene (unless there are space whales in the future...).

      It's hard to tell for sure because the trailer is, like all trailers, a hyperkinetic sampling of scenes that cut instantly to the next. But it seemed like a couple shots were silent, apart from a soundtrack which is probably just overlaid on the whole trailer for effect.

    7. Re:uuuuuu...huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, I was thinking the same thing when I watched Firefly. Why do bullets hurt people? If I wanted to see people get hurt, then I'd bloody well watch a war documentary.

    8. Re:uuuuuu...huh? by ceejayoz · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Mine's that the combat systems in ships would generate sounds to give sound cues and feedback.

      Hearing a ship pass you would be valuable, for example.

      What I'd love to see would be a sci-fi movie that implemented that, and had it cut out due to battle damage. All of a sudden, silence.

    9. Re:uuuuuu...huh? by Lahiru · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think there's a fair chance the sounds WILL be in the final film. I see your point about making the trailer more flashy than the film itself, but I can't think of any films where the trailer added sounds from outside the film's sound mix just for the trailer.

      They probably had to make some concessions to the studio in order to bring Firefly to the big screen. I doubt that the suits would have been eager to try something as experimental as taking out sound from space battles. And let's face it, most people in the audience will think something's wrong with the sound or the film's budget was stretched too thin to include good sound effects! Hollywood has programmed viewers to expect sound in space, so that's the norm. I'd love to be proven wrong though...

    10. Re:uuuuuu...huh? by voisine · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually, if you watch closely I think all the sound effects happened when you could clearly see atmospheric effects around the edges of the ship. There is a *lot* of sound durring re-entry. :)

    11. Re:uuuuuu...huh? by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "Mine's that the combat systems in ships would generate sounds to give sound cues and feedback."

      Err right. I think of soundfx in space as being like incidental music.

      Notice the actors never react to the sounds. (Unless you're watching B5... argh.)

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    12. Re:uuuuuu...huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The LOTR series trailers had music not in the movies and shots not in the movies. Of course, sfx is much more subtl...

    13. Re:uuuuuu...huh? by Rune+Berge · · Score: 1

      Why is there suddenly sounds in space?!?

      Suddenly????
      Have you ever seen a sci-fi movie before?

    14. Re:uuuuuu...huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is there suddenly sounds in space?!?

      Suddenly????
      Have you ever seen a sci-fi movie before?


      That's not the point. Have *you* ever seen Firefly before? You know, the TV series this is based on? The one that deliberately *didn't* have sounds in space?

    15. Re:uuuuuu...huh? by Scrameustache · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I can't think of any films where the trailer added sounds from outside the film's sound mix just for the trailer.

      How often do you pay attention to sounds in trailers and cross-reference them with the actual movie afterwards?

      I've never done that before, but I remember that the Inspector Gadget trailers had scenes that weren't actually in the movie itself.
      Man, that was a bad movie!

      I doubt that the suits would have been eager to try something as experimental as taking out sound from space battles.

      Experimental?
      Been done in Firefly, been done in SW:epII! AND in 2001: A Space Odyssy (yes, I count a waldo bashing a guy in a suit as a space battle, shaddap ;-).

      And as someone else has pointed out, most of the "space" battles in the trailer appear to be in high atmo.
      Plus, another poster said something wishfull about a combat system that includes sounds:

      I'd like to point out that if you listen to AM radio while watching a distant thunderstorm, you'll hear the lightning's electromagnetic interference through your speakers at the same time as you see the flash. Space battles would make a "sound" if there is something to take the huge EM noise and transform it into air vibration, like, say, a metal box that could resonnate... I dunno, like, a spaceship... possibly one with a comm system...

      : )

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    16. Re:uuuuuu...huh? by DaisyTheCow · · Score: 1

      I've never been able to manage it but I'll take your word for it :o)

    17. Re:uuuuuu...huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Although there are dozens of examples of trailers not matching the movie (scenes are shown in the trailer all the time that aren't in the final film... Anchorman was one), the one I always think of is Meet The Parents. In the trailer, Ben Stillers last name is pronounced with a "long o" sounds, I assume so people wouldn't be offended by how it is pronounced in the film (which is strange since that's one of the main gags and is actually included in the title to the sequel).

    18. Re:uuuuuu...huh? by Mostly+Monkey · · Score: 1

      One possible excuse for sound in space is that sound processing is added to the scanner system. The ship's computer would be able to analyze everything going on outside and generate sound (explosions, ship engines, etc) and output it to the equivelent of speakers throughout the ship to greatly add to situational awareness. Even if you weren't near a window you would still know that a ship just buzzed by outside since you could hear the computer generated "emulation" of it.

      At least that's what I tell myself everytime there is a silly loud explosion in space. Personally I prefer watching silence in space shows since it which seems to add more immersiveness.

      --
      Chika Chik-ah... do-e ow ow.
    19. Re:uuuuuu...huh? by Lahiru · · Score: 1

      How often do you pay attention to sounds in trailers and cross-reference them with the actual movie afterwards?

      Heh heh... actually, I used to watch trailers quite a bit at one point, when I was addicted to downloading and watching 'em! And yeah I have noticed line readings and sound clips change, but that's most likely because of ADR (additional dialog recording) done after the trailer is put together or because they wanted to tone down the dialogue being spoken specifically for the trailer. Although I've noticed special effects shots and the 'look' of the film being different from the trailer, I can't recall any distinctive sound effects changes... As for scenes not making the final cut, that happens quite often as well, but even they usually have the sound mixed in before being deleted.

      Then again, there are lots of generic sound effects that might go unnoticed in trailers, so I can't say with any certainty that they're all the same. Sounds being dropped from the trailer, however, is something I've never noticed! As far as I'm aware, these clips are passed on from the filmmakers in a fairly complete state for inclusion in the trailers (minus score, which is added towards the end); assuming I'm correct on that point, that would mean the folks behind the trailer added sounds to those scenes. If so, has Whedon mentioned anything about it?

      As for it being experimental, I stand by that point. 2001 was an exception, and it was more of an 'arty' film in any case. Given that this is being positioned as a conventional studio flick, the rules that applied to the tv series might not necessarily apply here - no sound in space is still a rarity on the big screen. Oh, and Episode II most certainly did have sound in space... except for that one sequence with the space mines dropped by Jango's ship, where the sound went dead for a few moments before the explosion. I believe that was done for dramatic effect (and not realism), because there was sound everywhere else!

      Anyway, I hope there is no sound in the space sequences. If they gave Whedon free reign, that's fantastic. If not, I wouldn't be surprised if the studio insisted on something asinine like including sounds...

  15. Re:Unjustly canceled? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OP Said:

    "Firefly sucked, plain and simple.
    Don't get your sci-fi-geek panties in a bunch, folks... Things don't get canceled because they're 'too good for TV', ok?"

    Oh bullshit. Firefly was on FOX.

    Does a little show by the name of "Family Guy" ring any bells?

  16. I need a paper bag by Umbral+Blot · · Score: 1

    huh huh huh huh huh - hyperventilates.
    Good thing I have the series on DVD to hold me until the movie. I didn't see Shepard Book in the preview. I hope we learn more of his back story.

    1. Re:I need a paper bag by Johnny+Mnemonic · · Score: 4, Informative


      Rumor is, that Book has only a very small role in the movie. Not all of the orginal cast could be gathered together; frankly, we're lucky we got as many as we did.

      Although there was some doubt precisely which character wasn't back for much, there was little doubt that one of the actors couldn't be signed--Joss was just vague about which one. But the preview (and other speculation) sure makes it look like it's Book.

      Better him that Inara, I guess ;) Hopefully we get more of that backstory in Eps 2 and 3, for which apparently there is strong interest by Universal.

      --

      --
      $tar -xvf .sig.tar
    2. Re:I need a paper bag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't see the mechanic chick anywhere either.

    3. Re:I need a paper bag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you poke around on IMDB a bit, you might find out which one won't be back. Don't dig too deep if you don't want a spoiler.

    4. Re:I need a paper bag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If Universal have a deal for another 2 movies it sorta makes sense.

      It always seemed like Book was a subplot that never got a chance to be developed.

      So if the first movie deals with River, the 2nd or 3rd could deal with the mystery of Book (and why a preacher gets first-class medical treatment from the Alliance, can recognise weapons by burn pattern, and use said weapons) :)

    5. Re:I need a paper bag by MerrieB · · Score: 1

      Kaylee is definitely in the movie. In Browncoats Forum, Joss made mention that she didn't get enough airtime in the trailer. Book either for that matter.

  17. Firefly is better than that ... by Heisenbug · · Score: 2, Insightful

    it sounds like I should poke around the site more, but I was actually disappointed with the trailer. It basically made it look like another space action movie, with none of the unique characters or plotting or effects or [embarrassing Joss Whedon lust here] that made Firefly stand out so much. I have my fingers crossed that it's just marketing (or that I'm just in a crotchety mood), and the actual movie will be consistent with the show.

    In the meantime, I for one would gladly buy a movie ticket just to see the original double-length episode of Firefly in a theater ... maybe if Serenity works out they should release that episode as "Serenity: Episode 1".

    1. Re:Firefly is better than that ... by Tenken · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It wouldn't really serve much purpose pandering to the Firefly fans, although as a fan I found the trailer wholly satisfying. They need to bring in the general audience, so it has to can't afford to be too quirky, at least not in the first trailer. Perhaps the fans will get one of those internet exclusive trailers, everyone knows thats where we all live ;)

    2. Re:Firefly is better than that ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with what you're saying, but consider this. For most movies, the trailer is jobbed out to a smaller production house. Rarely if ever does the actual director do the trailer, and considering that they only have 2 minutes to grab the average movie goers attention, cool fighting and sfx is probably all you're going to see. I would guess that only the bare minimum dialog was included in the trailer to setup the premise. Can you imagine the sound of the collective yawn in the movie theater if it was a two minute dramatic monologue by mal!

    3. Re:Firefly is better than that ... by drsquare · · Score: 1

      Well, the trailer's not aimed at Firefly fans who'll go and see it anyway, it's aimed at people who've never heard of it. You don't advertise at existing customers you advertise at new ones, this trailer is to get Americans with short attention-spans to be excited by the action. If you showed characters and plot they'd all be like: "Hey bubba, this moooovie's lame, let's go and drink some watery beer and lynch some niggers, and invade some third world country."

    4. Re:Firefly is better than that ... by samnice · · Score: 1

      first off it shouldn't be surprising to anyone that the trailer is flashy or full of action. Whedon no doubt wants it to appeal to as broad an audience as possible in the trailers. while there is ample footage to get fans motivated to see the film, the trailer isn't meant get fans to go - its meant to get jane and john moviegoer to show up and prove Whedon's "unique vision" was just misplaced on the small screen. Fanboy and Fangirl would be excited with a 10 minute trailer of River talking to sticks, but G. Public needs a little more incentive. that being said, i think the "action shots" included in the trailer bode well for the overall quality of the film. we get a Reaver on the ship, an Assasin (bounty hunter?) on their trail, some entaglement with a larger Alliance issue than River and undoubtedly more. Whedon has always said this will be a reintroduction of the story and characters done the way he originally envisioned. imagine STNG pilot on the big screen as a 2 hour movie with the benefit of rewrites. we also hear some familiar terse remarks from Mal and a great comment by Wash showing he still has the same dry wit as in the series. if two hours of dialogue gets distilled to just one or two catchy (but not cliche)clips, then we can all rest easy. its not like we had to see Data saying, "Lock an Load"

    5. Re:Firefly is better than that ... by NOLAChief · · Score: 1
      Definitely marketing...this time a good bait and switch. We reel them in with what appears to be a passable space action movie (kill a couple of hours and $20 bucks) and we switch that with an outstanding space action movie (I just got fired from my job because I haven't left this theater in two weeks and I don't care). Remember the idea here is to win converts to the Firefly cause so we get a TV series and/or more movies.

      Two caveats: 1. Joss, please don't make a liar out of me. 2. Please guys, as much as you want to, don't start camping out 3 months in advance wearing blue gloves or boots or your lovingly detailed replica of Vera. We don't want to scare people off.

    6. Re:Firefly is better than that ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd prefer another series, personally. But the rumourmill suggests only the possibility of a 2nd movie if the 1st does well, and a 3rd iff the first two do well enough...

    7. Re:Firefly is better than that ... by Goose3254 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I heard that if this movie performs well, the studio will film the next two movies back-to-back or at the same time a la "The Matrix" sequels (only better I hope).

      As far as a new series goes, although I really prefer that over a spread out movie series, I wouldn't look for that, at least until the movies play out, and then only with some drastic casting changes. Logically if these movies do really well, the cast will be properties considered too hot for series TV. One of the things I LIKED about "Firefly" was the fact that there was a careful "reveal" used on the characters. It definately left you wanting more. In a movie there isn't that much time, and you still have to include plot story and the obligitory "action", in order to make the movie stand on it's on merits. Another thing to look for is that if this movie is really successful, Joss himself will firmly movie into the "movie" realm, something that is kind of eluding him now.

      It would ROCK if they used this series to bring back the old "serial" format and could crank out one every 6 or 8 months, or better yet, get picked up by HBO or Showtime for a monthly series, like "The Sopranos". Considering the attention to detail and quality for which HBO has been noted in it's series work, I think Joss would be in his element, and the abbreviated filming cycles would allow the actors plenty of time to work in other projects. AND the DVD marketing of the series episodes already have a proven path to market. The best of all worlds!

  18. Just if you were wondering... by The-Bus · · Score: 2, Informative

    The music at the beginning of the trailer is Kasabian's song "Club Foot" --- and yes, the movie looks hot. Although the young-girl-fighting-people-using-Buffy-techniques- thing was a bit odd. Another downside: I have no idea what the movie is about. Although that could be good too.

    --

    Small potatoes make the steak look bigger.

    1. Re:Just if you were wondering... by adamthornton · · Score: 1

      This doesn't quite come out of nowhere. We've had a couple of indications in the series that River is very capable of surprisingly precisely targeted violence.

      Pity there's no Book in the trailer, and they talk about the six people on Serenity in the trailer. I want to know Book's backstory.

      Adam

    2. Re:Just if you were wondering... by metlin · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you've watched the series completely, you'd have noticed that River does some pretty amazing things, and has really heightened senses and reflexes - there is even an episode where she shoots several men straight with amazing accuracy.

      So, that wasn't really a surprise.

    3. Re:Just if you were wondering... by modecx · · Score: 1

      The sad thing is that as much as I wanted to watch the show when it was airing, what with it being Friday nights, PLUS the out of sequence, and moving it around--I caught about 3 episodes, and enjoyed every moment.

      Guess I'll have to get the DVD one of these days.

      --
      Constitutional rights may be respected, repealed, or modified; but they must never be ignored.
    4. Re:Just if you were wondering... by metlin · · Score: 1

      Actually, I never watched the show when it was aired (partly because one of the characters, Inara, had a striking resemblence to my ex.girlfriend). Then, I was gifted the whole DVD collection for my birthday this year, and God, I love that show!

    5. Re:Just if you were wondering... by AJWM · · Score: 4, Informative

      where she shoots several men straight with amazing accuracy.

      Oh come on, that doesn't do it justice. River sees the three men (who are shooting in her direction), has the gun, but doesn't want to see them get shot. So she turns away and, not looking at them, takes the three of them out with three well-placed shots. Kaylee is there (she'd dropped the gun), and that's the event that makes Kaylee a little afraid of River in the subsequent shows.

      --
      -- Alastair
    6. Re:Just if you were wondering... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not just looking away, she turned away and closed her eyes. THAT tells you how insanely powerful her alterations by the Blue Sun has made her.

    7. Re:Just if you were wondering... by drsquare · · Score: 0, Troll

      You know, if you're trying to get people to like (and watch) Firefly, you're going the wrong way about it, this whole thread makes it seem REALLY fucking lame. I mean, how often have we seen the cliche of the young cowardly girl who's good at fighting?

    8. Re:Just if you were wondering... by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      young-girl-fighting-people-using-Buffy-techniques

      Buffy techniques were: being superhumanly strong and fast.

      What River does is superhumanly precise, using normal human muscles.

      BTW, the girl playing River has a background in dance, the character River has a background in dance, and that choregraphy looks to me like the moves of a dancer hurting people, not a preternatural demon-like vampire slayer laying the smackdown.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    9. Re:Just if you were wondering... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You haven't seen it, obviously. River is definitely not a "young cowardly girl". She is young, a bit naive, and quite messed in the head, but not cowardly. She was "made" to be a human super-weapon. That fact that she was rescued while she still has a bit of little girl left in her (and not just creepy) is the interesting part of her character.

    10. Re:Just if you were wondering... by bwcarty · · Score: 1

      The line about six people probably refers to the starting crew:
      Mal
      Jayne
      Zoe
      Wash
      Kaylee
      Inara

      Simon, River, and Book came along as passengers at Persephone.

    11. Re:Just if you were wondering... by CamMac · · Score: 1

      Now see, you are missin' the entire point of the show. Its about the characters. Its about how they interact. Its about how the develope and what these developments do to them. Oh, and its about the one liners. :-)

      But its not about the cool technology, special effects, ppl with Comic book powers, and the hope of seeing Buffy in some tight leather.

      The people who would love this show are not the kind of people who we could 'get' to watch it. The people who would love this show will see us talking about it and go "Oh, that sounds intresting in an Oh-God-Oh-God-We-are-all-Going-to-Die? sort of way"

      --
      All jocks think about is sports. All nerds think about is sex.
    12. Re:Just if you were wondering... by Keeper · · Score: 1

      "No power in the 'verse can stop me."

    13. Re:Just if you were wondering... by Photon+Ghoul · · Score: 1

      one of the characters, Inara, had a striking resemblence to my ex.girlfriend

      Good one!

    14. Re:Just if you were wondering... by MegaFur · · Score: 1

      You're right, it does sound lame when presented in that way.

      From your comment, I can't tell if you've seen the series or not. At this point, that particular scene is ruined for you, but I do remember that when I saw it I was impressed.

      It's all in the details. The way things play out: up till that point, we still don't know the story with River although many details have been revealed. We know the government experimented on her and removed a piece of her brain, we know she's crazy most of the time and childlike other parts of the time. We know she is, or at least was, a supergenius. We know she seems to be able to know things about people she can't know. And she's kind of unpredictable.

      So. The crew have just done something which is *out of character* for them which is to be really extra-heroic and go on a mission to rescue the captain from a too-well defended base. (Yeah, yeah ok, so it sounds hokie maybe, but look this isn't episode one this like episode nine or ten or something. The disperate individuals that live on Serenity have been through a lot--they're *not* Star Trek Federation types that just selflessly lay down their lives because it's noble or something)

      Ok, so the crew's gone on ahead and left Kaylee, the mechanic, back at the ship to defend the ship's entry ramp so the crew can't get cut off on their way back to the ship.

      And these three guys start closing on Kaylee's position. And Kaylee tries to be brave for a moment, but then she just loses it and hides behind the side wall of the entry ramp--she's not a fighter.

      And neither is River, but suddenly she's there and she sees what's happening and grabs Kaylee's gun and she's still talking to herself. She's very agitated and nervous and pacing in place, she starts saying, "can't lookcan't look" to herself and her hair falls down in her eyes and we see her aim and fire at the three different locations the guys were coming from.

      And now the men are dead. And River looks at Kaylee, smiles and says, "no power in the 'verse can stop me." And that's spooky and eerie because previously that's what Kaylee had said to River when both of them were playing a keep-away sort of game with some apples.

      --
      Furry cows moo and decompress.
    15. Re:Just if you were wondering... by drsquare · · Score: 1

      You know, I haven't watched Firefly, and I didn't even read that comment, I read the first few lines and it looked like it was going to be really boring, so I'm sorry if you wasted much time writing it.

    16. Re:Just if you were wondering... by MegaFur · · Score: 1

      No, that's all right, it's no big deal. But since it probably took more effort for you to write that responding comment than it would for you to *not* have written it, I'm confused: why are you bothering to troll me? :-) It seems very strange.

      --
      Furry cows moo and decompress.
  19. Link to actual video file by overworked+underpaid · · Score: 1

    Get the actual video file for the large version of the trailer.

    1. Re:Link to actual video file by JamieF · · Score: 1

      >Get the actual video file [apple.com] for the large version of the trailer.

      If by "actual video file" you mean a 248 byte file that starts streaming playback of the actual video file.

      See http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=147453&cid=123 53816 for a 41MB downloadable version.

    2. Re:Link to actual video file by JamieF · · Score: 1

      OK, I take it back, I am a retard, your link looks almost exactly like another link that goes to the metafile. Please hurl bricks at my head. Thank you.

      *slinks away in shame*

  20. Serenity Preview? by rk · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'll be in my bunk...

    1. Re:Serenity Preview? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No time for that.

  21. semantics by slithytove · · Score: 1

    I'll grant that "unjust" isn't really the right word, but I'm having trouble coming up with a single adjective to "canceled" that explains to the uninformed that Firefly was canceled after being shown out of order (the pilot wasnt even first) and having its timeslot changed several times.
    I do think it was "unjust" to treat Joss Whedon's work the way they did after he proved himself capable of producing a 7 season show (that there was a magazine devoted to) and a 5 season spinoff.

    1. Re:semantics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They were probably sick of all the fucking idiots who watched Buffy talking to them in public.

      That's what I'd do.

      Get that fucker's new series and do every goddamn thing possible to kill it.

      Revenge is sweet.

  22. Re:Unjustly canceled? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    'cept, you never saw it, did you?

  23. Yes. by digit · · Score: 1

    I have the dvd and getting the book right now from amazon.

    What is the chance the it will be picked up on tv again?

    1. Re:Yes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The agreement Whedon has with Fox lets him make Firefly movies, but he can't make it as a TV series for ten years.

    2. Re:Yes. by tricops · · Score: 1

      Pretty slim until Universal releases their exclusive movie rights to it. So we may not see another series until the movies are over and done with, if at all... unfortunately :(

      --
      (\(\
      (^v^)
      (")")
      This is the cute vorpal bunny virus, copy to your sig or runaway, runaway in fear!
  24. xvid help? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I d/l'd the latest stable and beta koepi builds, but media player classic and windows media player still can't decode the video...am i missing something?

    1. Re:xvid help? by 01000011011101000111 · · Score: 5, Informative

      If you can't get it to work, grab a copy of vlc http://www.videolan.org/ - I've had files that media player makes unwatchable run fine in it... Should (iirc) also come with a whole bunch of codecs included as well...

      --
      Programming is an Art. I am an Artist. Does that mean I get to wear a daft hat?
    2. Re:xvid help? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      get ffdshow; it'll play whatever.

    3. Re:xvid help? by Snaller · · Score: 1

      If you can't get it to work,
      ... you are probably running a PC. It seems that the version that mplayer generates is not compatible with XVid (I also have a hardware chip and it can't play it either..)

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  25. There goes my money... by 01000011011101000111 · · Score: 1

    This is the first film for *years* I've actually wanted to go see before it was released... It's also probably going to be the first film *ever* I'll watch more than once at the cinema. Here's hoping some bright tv exec will decide to make another series... At least finish the plotline well, the cliffhanger at the end of series one is pretty much justification for murdering Fox executives on sight...

    --
    Programming is an Art. I am an Artist. Does that mean I get to wear a daft hat?
  26. Spoliers Galore by Shky · · Score: 1

    Watch right now if you're desperate to see the gang again. Don't even touch if you want to go in fresh. Joss himself said that it ain't shy, it gives away a lot if you know what to look for (and if you've seen the series, you know what kind of secrets remain to be revealed).

    --
    CC Licensed Serialized Story and Podcast: Ingenioustries
  27. WHERE THE HELL IS BOOK?! by gellenburg · · Score: 4, Funny

    WHERE THE HELL IS BOOK?!

    God.....

    Damnit!

    I want to know what the hell is up with BOOK! Who the hell is he?!

    Son of a BITCH!

    I mean... River is cute and all... you'd think they'd at least continue on with Book's character and give us fans some insight into his past.

    I mean... please. The character "River" is so cliché. Book is a real enigma.

    Fuck.

    1. Re:WHERE THE HELL IS BOOK?! by JTWYO · · Score: 4, Informative

      I read an interview today that implied that this movie will address who Book really is as well. As far as I know, the entire cast is back, even if they did leave a few of them out of the trailer. SPOILERS Also, reavers.

    2. Re:WHERE THE HELL IS BOOK?! by Gossi · · Score: 3, Informative

      Book is in the film. Just not the trailer.

    3. Re:WHERE THE HELL IS BOOK?! by Jeremy+Lydell+Haugen · · Score: 1

      From the looks of things, Kaylee and Book may be minor characters in the film. IMDB confirms that both characters/actors are in the film, but the trailer seems to suggest a limited role.

      --
      http://www.ihopethisworks.com
    4. Re:WHERE THE HELL IS BOOK?! by Jeremy+Lydell+Haugen · · Score: 4, Informative

      Book is in the trailer. Background, 1 min 56 secs in.

      --
      http://www.ihopethisworks.com
    5. Re:WHERE THE HELL IS BOOK?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've read the novelizations, and they're really not much to get excited about. Just watch the DVDs and try to be happy. Otherwise, you're setting yourself up for disappointment.

    6. Re:WHERE THE HELL IS BOOK?! by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      I was under the impression they got the all of the major cast members back for the movie?

    7. Re:WHERE THE HELL IS BOOK?! by ATMosby · · Score: 1

      Who do you thnk is leading the evil empire's search for the rest of the gang? :-)

    8. Re:WHERE THE HELL IS BOOK?! by shokk · · Score: 1

      I don't see him. One of the reasons I like QT is that I can view it frame-by-frame - going through to see all of the little details in the quick stream of images that flash by. He aint there.

      --
      "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master."
    9. Re:WHERE THE HELL IS BOOK?! by MerrieB · · Score: 1

      Yes. In fact, this was a giant deal! Perhaps Book doesn't have as large a role in the film as the series, but it was quite a coup to get all the original crew back for the movie.

  28. SOUND IN SPACE???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The trailer has sounds of ships racing around in space... aaaauuuuuughhh!

    WTF! That was one of the refreshing aspects of the series... no sound in space. Yay! It made those scenes much more focused.

    I hope that the trailer is just a fluke otherwise they can bite my shiny metal ass... I'll be saving my money.

    1. Re:SOUND IN SPACE???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you not notice the distortion ripples? The sounds were atmospheric, it was in the outer layer of a planets atmosphere during those scenes. I had the same initial reaction until I looked at where it was.

  29. This is why you should be excited. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    If you are having trouble understanding the hype behind Serenity, then save yourself a lot of mindless opinioneering and just watch the show Firefly on DVD.

    It is science fiction that never embarasses you for watching it.

    The characters, the stories, the pacing, the dialogue, the delicious writing, and the utter commitment to quality are evident in every single scene of every single episode. Nobody's phoning anything in, and THAT is why Serenity is getting people excited. Not because George Lucas needs another burnished ivory walking stick.

    That the special effects are the best ever gifted to a science fiction show (read: subtle, professional, photorealistic, and utterly seamless) is just icing on the cake.

    1. Re:This is why you should be excited. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Firefly was nice, but it was more of a western-in-space, not a scifi. If scifi embarrasses you, why don't you just not watch it, rather than trying to make it into something which it is not?

  30. Browncoats == brownshirts? by bratboy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've never watched the TV show (although I've read a synopsis of the backstory), and the first thought I had when hearing that the rebels were called "browncoats" was that it was curious that they'd chosen a term with such loaded historical connotations (the "brownshirts" were the Sturmabteilung, i.e., the Storm troops, i.e., the private army of the Nazi party). My goal here isn't to be PC, but rather to ask those more steeped in the lore of the show whether there's been a discussion on why the show's creators chose this term.
    -daniel

    1. Re:Browncoats == brownshirts? by Blackeagle_Falcon · · Score: 1

      Well, I haven't seen the TV show either (though I may have to pick it up on DVD), but when I heard "browncoats" I associated them with "redcoats" rather than brownshirts.

    2. Re:Browncoats == brownshirts? by -Harlequin- · · Score: 1

      I imagine Browncoats == bluecoats, not brownshirts, or something like that - the background theme is a kind of "the US civil war, but in the future, except the other side won" thing.

    3. Re:Browncoats == brownshirts? by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      As far as I can tell, the rural side lost, and the urban side won. Just like in the American Civil War.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    4. Re:Browncoats == brownshirts? by pdbogen · · Score: 1

      Actually, I get much more of an American Revolution feeling from the whole thing, which would make Browncoats=Redcoats (just dirtier); this seems to fit more. I.e., freedom-mongers versus "Civilized" Tyrants (the bits where you see civilization in the film seem to reinforce this).. But maybe that's just me.

    5. Re:Browncoats == brownshirts? by -Harlequin- · · Score: 1

      Yes, you're right, it's the revolutionary war. I'm not from the US, so my grasp of US history isn't always up to par :)

    6. Re:Browncoats == brownshirts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe he was talking about that war with England we had a while back and just got mixed up.

    7. Re:Browncoats == brownshirts? by LMariachi · · Score: 1

      No, the Redcoats were the civilized British tyrants. The Browncoats are analogous to the Confederacy (the South) in the American Civil War. (a.k.a. "The War of Northern Aggression.")

    8. Re:Browncoats == brownshirts? by Moofie · · Score: 1

      "discussion on why the show's creators chose this term."

      I'm just spitballin' here, but maybe it's because the writer initially imagined the rebel forces wearing coats that were brown?

      Call me crazy.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    9. Re:Browncoats == brownshirts? by STrinity · · Score: 1

      the background theme is a kind of "the US civil war, but in the future, except the other side won" thing.

      No, the pro-union industrialized society won in both cases. The interesting thing about the Alliance is that they aren't really bad-guys. Sure, there's the Blue Hand Group, but they're a cabal within the military/industrial complex, not the government itself. When we see the Alliance military, they're generally patrolling the spaceways, transporting medicines, or looking for fugitives. The crew of Serentiy bad-mouths the Alliance a lot, but that's because they're criminals -- smuggling, thieving, and scavenging around derelict space-ships.

      --
      Les Miserables Volume 1 now up with my reading of
  31. Obligatory quote by DaHat · · Score: 4, Funny

    I for one welcome our new blue handed overlords!

    1. Re:Obligatory quote by AdamTheBastard · · Score: 1

      That has to be the most Shiny use of a slashdot clique ever.

      I for one will only welcome them two by two.

    2. Re:Obligatory quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean cliché. Also, I hate you.

  32. we all like firefly by rvr · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I had not heard of the series Firefly and a friend highly recommended it so I obliged and borrowed the DVD. I plugged it in and it became a hit with me and my three kids. It is now a favorite, we all became hooked.

    We loved the surprises and twists of the series and the trailer had some hints of it. We loved the gritty nature and the "western" feel. Can't afford fancy kick ass laser guns? Use regular 19th century handguns. Works for me. Do I use a scientific magnifying glass to look for blunders? No. I just sit back and enjoy and don't give a rats ass about that - leave that to others.

    The mix of future and contemporary, sci-fi and western, redneckness and intelligence and humor and seriousness captivated me. Bring on the movie. A little breath of fresh air in the glut of shows that pass for TV entertainment.

    I plan on watching the series late september and then checking out the movie. Will wait.

  33. Screw Star Wars Episode 3 by MourningBlade · · Score: 3, Interesting

    With a big rubber dick. I'll wait until it comes out on DVD and I can rent it.

    THIS, however, is something I want to see on opening night.

  34. If the movie does well enough... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the movie does well enough, Universal will pick it up for a second and third installment.

    Well duh! You make it sound like Hollywood is a bunch of good guys. I'm sure if movie does well, Universal will have a franchise to milk to death, and if it fails (or just underperforms) they will kick Joss to the curb without a second thought.

  35. Direct Files by rechelon · · Score: 5, Informative
    1. Re:Direct Files by bluephone · · Score: 1

      Dude, thanks. The links on Apple say I need iTunes to DL the full screen, and I am NOT going to use tha tpile of steaming crap.

      --
      jX [ Make everything as simple as possible, but no simpler. - Einstein ]
    2. Re:Direct Files by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Did iTunes touch you in your bathing suit place? Wow. Why the ire?

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    3. Re:Direct Files by bluephone · · Score: 1

      Nah. On Win32 it loads two services that run whether you need them or not. One is for the ITMS and the other is for the iPod, which I don't have. If I disable the iPod service, iTunes bitches everytime I started it, despite my not having an iPod and thus not NEEDING the service. The other serivce is retarded, as I shouldn't need it unless iTunes is running. So that's two services chewing up memory uselesly. Plus, it's slow, resource hungry (compared to my trusty WinAmp 2.9x), and buggy. Well, it was when I tried it a while ago. I have no need for it anyway, as I just rip my CDs semi-manually, rather than pay more for no original media and a DRM locked file.

      --
      jX [ Make everything as simple as possible, but no simpler. - Einstein ]
    4. Re:Direct Files by Moofie · · Score: 1

      How many services does Windows load, "whether you need them or not"? By my count, about a million.

      WinAmp is great, until I want to use it to organize a 100gb library. Then, it is teh sux.

      Hey, use what you like. But iTunes' database is THE killer feature of any music player/organizer, and Winamp ain't got one.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    5. Re:Direct Files by bluephone · · Score: 1
      But I can disable those Windows services and not have apps whine about it unless their actually needed. And I've done just that.

      As for databases, my music collection is pretty well organized in directories by artist and album, with another directory for assorted singles. And yes, this is for thousands of files, not just a few hundred. :)

      --
      jX [ Make everything as simple as possible, but no simpler. - Einstein ]
    6. Re:Direct Files by Moofie · · Score: 1

      I remember when I was worried about the directory structure of my MP3 collection. That was before I figured out how Smart Playlists work.

      Hell, iTunes could have a donkey-raping service installed in the background. As long as it is still the BEST ID3 tag manager, and BEST playlist manager, I've ever found? I don't really care.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    7. Re:Direct Files by bluephone · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, a donkey-rape service would be a bonus. I'll RFE that for Forefox 1.1...

      --
      jX [ Make everything as simple as possible, but no simpler. - Einstein ]
  36. sound in space? oh well, itll be better than h2g2 by BlakeCaldwell · · Score: 1

    man, i was so happy to see the series not have sound in space, and now the movie does? ugh, guess the 15-year-olds' tickets need to be sold...

    ugh..

    if this movie is as good as the trailer makes it seem, at least we can get over the failure of h2g2 (i refuse to pay money for that, already knowing it's gonna suck) :)

  37. Re:unjust? by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I've noticed that, most of the time, when someone says they were modded down for "going against slashthink", what they really mean is... ...they were modded down for being gratuitously insulting.

    or ...they spent a half hour carefully crafting a post that explained in lengthy detail why they didn't care about the story, and why anyone who did care about it was an idiot.

    or ...their rebuttal was so riddled with factual inaccuracies that it undermined the point they were trying to make.

    Of course, bad moderation happens, and bad moderators exist. But a solid 80% of the time, it's just people being shocked to learn that they're not a tenth as brilliant or convincing as they would like to think.

    In your case, you're trying to make much of semantics, and going about it a little wrongheadedly. Since nobody but you called it a "shocking" or "brutal" injustice, you've apparently tried to blow our miffed feelings way out of proportion. Injustices come in a wide variety of sizes, from kicking the family dog to wholesale genocide.

    Yeah, it was just a show. But it was a good show, and deserved better treatment than FOX gave it. I think the word "unjust" is apt.

    YMMV, IANAL, PBUH.

    --

    You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

  38. Sound in Space?! by Shky · · Score: 2, Insightful

    One of the coolest things about Firefly was the lack of sound in space. I certainly hope that they've only put the sounds in for the trailer, but somehow I doubt that. Here's hoping they haven't made too many more stylistic changes (because the show was already dripping with amazing style).

    --
    CC Licensed Serialized Story and Podcast: Ingenioustries
    1. Re:Sound in Space?! by rechelon · · Score: 0

      Careful analysis of the trailer will reveal that all the "sound in space" scenes happen in a) the atmosphere or b) some weird nebula thing And loud music does not equate StarTrek wooshes.

    2. Re:Sound in Space?! by larkost · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Sadly I did not see any evidence of the classic look from FireFly specifically:
      • the color scheme is very "cool" (color temprature... more blue), verses the much warmer scheme used in the series (more like the pallet from a western)
      • the series was famous for making special effect shots look like they were done with a hand-help camera: out of focus objects coming into focus, wild panning across the frame as if someone was trying to track with a moving object (rather than the perfect framing that is common), the point of view shaking with the "engine noise", etc..
      • many more close-ups of the actors. The series usually tried to keep groups in frame.
      I hope that the preview is not representative of the final work we will see in September in this regard... I liked those aspects of the series. In any case... I will be there.
    3. Re:Sound in Space?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I wouldn't hit it, her knees are just too sharp.

    4. Re:Sound in Space?! by mbbac · · Score: 1

      I agree with you on all of the points you mentioned. I just rewatched it and I believe I saw one CGI shot with the same handheld look that I loved from the series. I hope it'll be the norm in the movie instead of the exception.

      --

      mbbac

  39. Looks really, really cool... but... by weslocke · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Was anyone else bothered by the 'turning away' from the western aspect of the series? I kept an eye out when I heard the techno/industrial song, but all I caught was a glimpse or two of revolvers. I fully imagine that the movie will be true to the series, but I still feel a bit let down that I didn't hear "Burn the land and boil the sea, you can't take the sky from me" in the preview...

    It's been running through my head ever since Joss said the trailer was coming...

    Sigh...

    (Still looks cool as heck though)

    --

    'Life is like a spoonful of Drain-O, it feels good on the way down but leaves you feeling hollow inside'
  40. Re:Unjustly canceled? by DavidTC · · Score: 1

    'alien ass'?

    --
    If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
  41. Interesting.... by jonr · · Score: 1

    So, since I have not seen the series, should I rent them, or see the movie first?

    1. Re:Interesting.... by -Harlequin- · · Score: 1

      See the series first.

    2. Re:Interesting.... by kannibal_klown · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Definately see the series in some form or another before going to see the movie. The movie appears to deal with the whole back-story that was floating around since the first episode.

      It's really a good series, but I know some that didn't like it. Personally I wasn't a big fan of it when it was first on TV, but I downloaded the first ep and got hooked. Bought the DVD boxed set the very next day.

    3. Re:Interesting.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Buy them. You can rent them a la Netflix, but odds are pretty good you'll just want a copy of the whole series anyways, if you're the kind of person who collects good sci fi. I don't collect many DVDs, but that's exactly what I did after getting the DVDs from Netflix first...

      Don't worry, there's plenty of time between now and opening night to turn you into a screaming, drooling fan like the rest of us! :-)

    4. Re:Interesting.... by pdbogen · · Score: 1

      In case you aren't convinced, see the series. If nothing else, it will help tide you over until September. :)

    5. Re:Interesting.... by larkost · · Score: 1

      Rent the series. They will probably give a bit of the back story to get people going (especially since they seem to be expanding on River's... the fighting girl... backstory). The serie's creator said this this movie will take place about 6 months after the series left off.

      The series is really worth watching, and I would recommend it even if the stories overlapped. I say that as a person who never saw an episode on TV, but watched it first through NetFlix, and then bought the DVDs.

      And I wonder if in the run-up to the movie if the shows from the already completed series will make it back onto TV?

  42. 640x480 = Fullscreen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I'm shutting down my 386/Windows 3.1 box and hitting the cineplex to see this trailer on a REAL big screen.

    1. Re:640x480 = Fullscreen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the off chance that somebody is seriously wondering, 640x480 is indeed fullscreen in NTSC.

  43. I promised myself... by macemoneta · · Score: 1

    I promised myself that I wouldn't go see the movie after the way Fox yanked me around and then cancelled the series. But damn, this might be the only movie that gets me into a theater this year. I can't believe I'm actually looking forward to a movie again. It's been so long, I thought they had forgotten how to make them interesting and exciting.

    --

    Can You Say Linux? I Knew That You Could.

    1. Re:I promised myself... by -Harlequin- · · Score: 1

      Eh? Then you should go to the movie to get back at Fox. Fox isn't making the movie - Wheldon sold the movie rights to Universal when Fox screwed over the show.

      Therefore, the best revenge is to have the Fox execs weep to see their competitor make an absolute killing on a show they couldn't be bothered airing. :-)

    2. Re:I promised myself... by macemoneta · · Score: 1
      Eh? Then you should go to the movie to get back at Fox. Fox isn't making the movie - Wheldon sold the movie rights to Universal when Fox screwed over the show.

      Excellent! Maybe I'll go see it twice and buy the DVD then. Fox can kiss my ass. :)

      --

      Can You Say Linux? I Knew That You Could.

    3. Re:I promised myself... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AMEN!

  44. Why is there sound in space? by cfalcon · · Score: 1

    One of the big selling points of Firefly was that sound doesn't travel in space, so the space scenes have no sound. It was soooo cool, I couldn't not watch it. I really hope someone in the know can tell me whether that crap is in the movie or if it's just in the trailer.

    Firefly was far too good to remain on the air, sadly.

    1. Re:Why is there sound in space? by tukkayoot · · Score: 1
      There is sound in space because anybody who isn't a geek is conditioned to expect sound when something the size of a spaceship flies by ... if there's silence, they suspect technical difficulties, a strained budget, etc. It's jarring to one's suspension to disbelief for most people, even though it is more scientifically accurate.

      The thing is, movies like 2001 and shows like Firefly could get away with not having sound in space, because the parts of the movie that took place in space weren't really action-packed. When you're talking about something like Star Trek, or Star Wars, or Farscape, or Babylon 5 (where I hear they experimented with having no space sounds with focus groups, and got an unfavorable/confused reaction) then the lack of sound and visual effects like explosions and fires makes for a rather dull, unstimulating awkward experience.

      For myself, I didn't even realize watching the show that there was no sound in space, because there weren't a bunch of space battles and the like. Really the space scenes did not interest me as much as the characters, the dialog and the stories. If just those elements can safely make it into the movie, I'll count myself lucky and be a happy camper.

      I understand the geek appeal of getting a detail like soundless space right, but I really don't see how it's this huge draw. I won't be disappointed by the fact that there is sound in space, but there are a bunch of action-packed space battles that make the sounds virtually necessary, that may prove a rather disappointing departure from the series.

      Personally I'm not getting my hopes up about Firefly, and I doubt I'll go see it in theaters (owing in part to the fact that I don't live near any theaters, so going to see movies is a chore for me). Either it'll just be another space action movie, or it will be something I'll be content to watch at home on TV, like the series.

    2. Re:Why is there sound in space? by cfalcon · · Score: 1

      Well, honestly, fuck anybody who isn't a geek. They have all the other movies to pollute with their antiscientific expectations, right?

      This is the hardest sci-fi I've ever seen in a series, and it still manages to pull off a focus on the characters as well. It's crazy good.

      Defending all that stuff in Star Trek/Wars, Babylon 5, etc... well, that's fine. That's how those things go. I don't hold them to near the same standards as I do Firefly, that's for sure. It would be like expecting cartoons to obey the laws of physics, or news to be impartial, or sports shows to discuss math.

      The first space seen in Firefly had me shouting at the edge of my seat, screaming at the TV, telling it how badass it was, and encouraging it to continue.

      I don't really care how they do it in theaters, as long as they do. It would be crappy for the show to be one way, and the movie another.

      I'll see it opening night if I can, unless it gets terrible reviews from smart people. But honestly, the trailer looks good, so it's probably ok.

      Except for those sound effects, which I hope are trailer specific.

    3. Re:Why is there sound in space? by maxpublic · · Score: 0, Troll

      I'd say "fuck anyone who gets their panties in a wad over an added special effect". Really, if you're that uptight about 'sound in space' then you need to get your priorities straight. Or perhaps a life.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    4. Re:Why is there sound in space? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no sound in space anymore than a knife goes "scwhingg!" when you raise it.

      Audio cues are used all the time to emphasize the action, so why should space be any different?

    5. Re:Why is there sound in space? by RupW · · Score: 1

      There is no sound in space anymore than a knife goes "scwhingg!" when you raise it.

      Audio cues are used all the time to emphasize the action, so why should space be any different?


      If you move a big knife fast enough, you'll hear an air rush. Yes, it's almost always exaggerated.

      The point is they deliberately didn't have sound-in-space in the series. It worked because the space scenes were short, because of the start contrast and because of an excellent orchestral score.

      Sound may be back here just for the trailer, but it wouldn't surprise me if they've had to ditch no-sound-in-space for the film because 1) the space scenes are longer and 2) it's not what we've come to expect.

  45. Download link? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Right-click and choose save-as to download and save to your drive. Much easier than typing in the URL by hand.

  46. That looks pretty damn cool by MetalliQaZ · · Score: 1

    That looks pretty damn cool. I wonder if I should go rent the firefly DVDs.
    I remember being all excited about the TV show, but when I saw the premier
    episode, it was a yawn fest. This movie looks like a must-see though.

    -d

    --
    "Here Lies Philip J. Fry, named for his uncle, to carry on his spirit"
    1. Re:That looks pretty damn cool by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      I remember being all excited about the TV show, but when I saw the premier episode, it was a yawn fest.

      I will never forgive Fox for that.

      A whole summer of ads ending with "...and a girl in a box", first ep shown: No girl in a box.

      The Train Job was the weakest of the 14 episodes, it was written in weeked to satisfy the Fox overlord who demanded a first ep. with "more action". They destroyed that show on purpose, or they are all grossly incompetant, either way, I hate them nearly as much as I hate Rick Berman.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    2. Re:That looks pretty damn cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, for one thing, the ep you saw as the Premier wasn't the first episode in the series. Fox, after deciding to cancel the show, finally showed the 2 part pilot as the last episode to air - just one of the many amazingly boneheaded moves they made with Firefly.

      I highly recommend the DVDs, especially because you get to see all the episodes (including the few not aired at all) in the proper order. I also found the first ep (The Train Job) that Fox aired to be a bit boring, but the dialog, subtle humor, and the great bit of less-than-subtle humor with the musclebound gut at the end kept me around to watch more and I was thrilled that I did. :)

  47. "his unique vision of the future" by Scooter · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Don't get me wrong, I liked the series, and this is one film that will persuade me to drag my ass to the cinema to endure the neck creaking, rustling, coughing and sweating, not to mention the washed out scratchy picture and unsatisfactory sound rendering; in order to see it before it premiers for real - on a disc I can play at home - on something a bit less agricultural, while I have a drink, but enough of my cinema pet hates rant :P

    I have to take issue with this statement though - this vision of the future is hardly unique. In fact, it's a fairly standard issue vision of the future as proposed by Poul Anderson (Trader Team, The long night, Mirkheim etc), Marc Miller (Traveller et al), Bell & Braben (Elite) George Lucas (Star Wars), Harry Harrison (Rat series):-

    Take sea going activities and extrapolate into space. Merchant ships, pirates, busy ports, adventure on the high, er.. volumes of near vacuum... and so on.

    That said, it happens to be a vision I like - a working, slightly dirty and worn around the edges future filled with real looking objects - a vision that could be said to have been pioneered by Lucas, at least on screen.

    I hope the soundtrack on that trailer isn't indicative though - cheap music will really feck this movie up. Using current pop output to score a film like this will date it in months.

    1. Re:"his unique vision of the future" by Abcd1234 · · Score: 2, Informative

      "Take sea going activities and extrapolate into space."

      I believe by "unique" they were referring to the blend of Sci-Fi and Western that Whedon went with... unfortunately, that isn't unique either. :)

    2. Re:"his unique vision of the future" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Watch the series, and you'll see what they mean by his "unique vision". The world of "Firefly" set 500 years in the future also includes horses, revolvers, and many other anachronistic elements.

      The explanation: humanity has spread out to other planets and begun to teraform some of them to be inhabitable to humans. The "core" planets are just what you'd imagine in a future space movie, but the poorer and farther out planets are the "frontier", and people get by in less than ideal circumstances, which often resembles the American Old West. This is why the show has been called a "space western".

      There may be others who have come up with something like this, but I think it's pretty different from the standard space fare.

    3. Re:"his unique vision of the future" by option8 · · Score: 1

      i feel your pain. i hate the moviegoing experience enough to have found the best time to go to a movie is just before it gets pulled from the theaters. on a weekday. in the afternoon.

      i'm often the only one in the audience. good thing my office has a "flex time" policy.

      all that aside, i think a lot of people missed what made the series an original - characters.

      look at most any sci fi show on tv, and you'll see the same cardboard cutouts propped up by inane reliance on technology and the same four plots to push the season forward. the exception is clearly Battlestar Galactica, which is so vastly superior to the last gasps of Enterprise (oo! a plot arc that involves time travel *and* an alternate universe! is it blowing your mind yet!?) that it's no surprise which one will be on again in the fall.

      where was i? oh yeah. whedon's characters. they surprise you. i've recently started DVRing Angel (need to find a better verb, since i have a replayTV, and saying i Tivo a show doesn't feel right) and i'm realizing what i really liked about the writing and composition of firefly was the depth they put into each character. the reason angel (which i never watched when it was first run) and buffy were such big "cult" hits wasn't the subject matter, but the stories behind the characters, and their dynamism. they're not as forgiving and understanding as their counterparts on your run of the mill show. things aren't always hunkey dorey, cue the laugh track and the closing themesong when the end credits roll. there's real tension, and i'm often surprised by what the characters do - like real people. they have motivations and emotions and aren't always perfectly rational.

      so, yeah. i want the show back, but i'll settle for a movie franchise. i'll own them all on dvd before i own all the star wars discs.

    4. Re:"his unique vision of the future" by eskayp · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "...i'm often surprised by what the characters do - like real people. they have motivations and emotions and aren't always perfectly rational "

      Plus the times they are completely rational, but in a totally unexpected direction or manner.
      Firefly's CG, special effects, and production were good, but you're right -- it was the character development that addicted us.
      So many arresting personal quirks and offbeat futuretalk sayings.
      We need Firefly restored to continue the story.

      --
      I didn't desert Windows; Windows deserted me: BSOD
    5. Re:"his unique vision of the future" by AJWM · · Score: 1

      Marc Miller (Traveller et al)

      Don't get me wrong, I'm thankful to Marc Miller for creating Traveller, but he did get many of his ideas from the SF of the time; in particular, E. C. Tubb's "Earl Dumarest" series. (Including low, middle, and high passage, air rafts, and much else, although not specific characters or organizations (eg Cyclan)).

      I wouldn't worry at all about the music on the trailer -- that is frequently radically different from anything in the movie (sometimes, the movie score isn't yet finished when they're putting out the trailers). Sounds in space...well, we'll see.

      --
      -- Alastair
    6. Re:"his unique vision of the future" by jdbattin · · Score: 1

      I think Robert Heinlein touched upon a similar 'verse with the Tale of the adopted daughter section in Time Enough for Love novel. This similarity is why I liked the Firefly series and will more than likely enjoy the movie.

    7. Re:"his unique vision of the future" by ar1550 · · Score: 1

      I hope the soundtrack on that trailer isn't indicative though - cheap music will really feck this movie up. Using current pop output to score a film like this will date it in months.

      Most likely the film has not even been scored yet. Many trailers use pop music or a recycled track from another movie because the score is one of the last things added to the film; there is no score when the trailer is put together.

      --
      I once shot a man in Reno 'cause they cancelled Firefly.
    8. Re:"his unique vision of the future" by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      I have to take issue with this statement though - this vision of the future is hardly unique.

      I'm sorry, how many other visions of a future where an sino-anglo alliance dominates a vast federation of terraformed planets following the destruction of the earth are there?

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    9. Re:"his unique vision of the future" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      i've recently started DVRing Angel (need to find a better verb, since i have a replayTV, and saying i Tivo a show doesn't feel right)
      You could use "time-shifting"; not a new term, but it rolls off the tongue and most people will probably assume you're using a DVR for that, as noone can program their VCRs, surely. The other term I might suggest would be "recording"; the choice of media isn't really that important, except to show off your geek credentials. ("No, sir, I'm not using my VCR, which everyone knows nobody can program, I'm using my shiny ReplayTV, a hyuck!")
    10. Re:"his unique vision of the future" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless Joss decides to edit it out at the last minute, I'm fairly certain I heard some sound coming from some weird plasma gun emplacement. That sort of sound effect would tend to be from the movie, I would think, unless the trailer people editted that in at the last moment (and why would they bother with the added expense of tracking down a sound and accurately overdubbing it?). That said, a lot of the sequences seem relatively silent; the only clear sounds I could hear were during the re-entry sequence (but if you have enough atmosphere for burning streaks, surely you have an excuse to add some sound), and atmospheric flights (which obviously are OK).

      I don't really see why that's such a big freak'n deal, though. It's just a gimmick, one way or another, the show's fun to watch because of the people, damn it.

    11. Re:"his unique vision of the future" by CptNerd · · Score: 1
      i've recently started DVRing Angel (need to find a better verb, since i have a replayTV, and saying i Tivo a show doesn't feel right)

      You could use "time-shifting"; not a new term, but it rolls off the tongue and most people will probably assume you're using a DVR for that, as noone can program their VCRs, surely.
      Plus, "time-shifting" (or better yet "timeshifting" has that "futuristic" feel to it: "I'm timeshifting the very fabric of broadcast television itself!!!"

      --
      By the taping of my glasses, something geeky this way passes
    12. Re:"his unique vision of the future" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I'm sorry, how many other visions of a future where an sino-anglo alliance dominates a vast federation of terraformed planets following the destruction of the earth are there?

      Your comment reminded me of the "Chung Kuo" series by David Wingrove. It's good reading if you enjoy sci-fi and can find the time to read seven books consecutively.

    13. Re:"his unique vision of the future" by mbbac · · Score: 1

      Dude, Star Wars is set in the past not the future. You can't bring up George Lucas here.

      I think Whedon's unique vision is that in the future America and China have joined forces as the last two countries to form a universal federation.

      --

      mbbac

    14. Re:"his unique vision of the future" by Scooter · · Score: 1

      A sort of "final frontier" then? :P

    15. Re:"his unique vision of the future" by Scooter · · Score: 1

      Hmm I take your point, but I think those are more details than "the vision". The vision being a universe where interplantary travel is possible, with goods and services traded between them and vast frontiers to explore and tame.

      Throw in some political background with a handful of warring factions.

    16. Re:"his unique vision of the future" by Scooter · · Score: 1

      Star Wars is set in a "galaxy far far away" as well, so I don't think the story's position in our timeline is relevant.

      The vision is similar - spacefaring civilsation, frontier worlds, merchant ships, smugglers, pirates etc. George realised his vision in film a while ago.

    17. Re:"his unique vision of the future" by Scooter · · Score: 1

      Agreed - I remember reading an interview with Miller, in which he outlined his inspiration and sources for traveller including Poul Anderson's books and Star Wars. Elite, of course is basically Traveller - the computer game: even the example character has the same name!

      I specifically mentioned Traveller though, as this was the thing that immediatley struck me when I watched the series - it was almost identical to a typical Traveller campaign: rag-tag bunch of adventurers/desperados each with their own shady past, scratch a living trading goods between planets, whilst getting involved in local scams/disputes/heists and mercenary activities. Then, on top you place the mystery/push/pull as described in the Trvaller Adventure campaign book..

      This realisation takes nothing away from Whedon's universe. In fact, as a long time Traveller fan, it makes it all the more appealing to me.

    18. Re:"his unique vision of the future" by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      Your comment reminded me of the "Chung Kuo" series by David Wingrove. It's good reading if you enjoy sci-fi and can find the time to read seven books consecutively.

      Hmmm, never heard of it, but a google search led me to a site, and the "more books like this" button gave me a long list of some of my favourite books, so I think I'll try to remember those names next time I'm shopping for books.

      Thanks!

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    19. Re:"his unique vision of the future" by AJWM · · Score: 1

      If they do have "sounds in space" in the movie, I hope the DVD has an optional soundtrack without them.

      I say "they" instead of "Joss" above because there's always additional influence. Whedon certainly has more clout now than he did then, but recall that the original "Buffy the Vampire Slayer" movie was rather different than what Whedon had in mind.

      --
      -- Alastair
  48. Re:unjust? by jaymzter · · Score: 0

    In your case, you're trying to make much of semantics, and going about it a little wrongheadedly. Since nobody but you called it a "shocking" or "brutal" injustice, you've apparently tried to blow our miffed feelings way out of proportion. Injustices come in a wide variety of sizes, from kicking the family dog to wholesale genocide.

    Jeesh, get a life, it's a Futurama quote, for crying out loud. Perhaps _you_ shouldn't be so thin skinned.

    --
    If thou see a fair woman pay court to her, for thus thou wilt obtain love
  49. To be perfectly honest by hayden · · Score: 1
    Fuck the second and third installments of the movie. I want the bloody tv series back!

    It is by far the best sci-fi tv show ever. Joss had really got the hang of comedy one minute and grittyness the next and it makes for great tv.

    It's a travesty that something this good gets canned while other rubbish gets endless seasons (everytime I see Mutent-X on late night tv there is a deep desire to strangle a tv exec).

    --
    Nerd: Derogatory term typically directed at anybody with a lower Slashdot ID than you.
    1. Re:To be perfectly honest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How the hell do they have Mutant-X and no Serenity fools.... yes I too feel like strangling some exec somewhere.

    2. Re:To be perfectly honest by bnenning · · Score: 1

      It is by far the best sci-fi tv show ever.

      Before Battlestar Galactica I would agree, now it's too close to call. But yeah, Firefly should absolutely be back on TV. Fox finally found the sense to bring Family Guy back, hopefully they can do the same here.

      --
      How to solve most of our problems: 1.Lots of nuclear plants. 2.Cure aging.
  50. Re:Looks really, really cool... but... by -Harlequin- · · Score: 1

    The purpose of the trailer is to get people who have never seen Firefly to go and see Serenity.

    You are not the target audience. A bunch of stuff that makes sense to someone like you is a bunch of random crap that confuses the hell out of someone who only knows "it's some sci-fi flick".

  51. YAY!! by ananegg · · Score: 1

    WOOOHOOO!!!!!

    --
    Insert Pithy Quote here.
  52. Re:Serenity Now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why can't you be more like Lloyd Braun?

  53. Re:re:re all the way home by Darth+Hubris · · Score: 1

    What royally sucked was that they put Firefly up against Farscape and the whole SciFriday thing on SciFi. That was a bad move. I wasn't smart enough at the time to record Firefly, but I did borrow the DVD's eventually. Good stuff, indeed.

    --
    The party's over ... the drink ... and the luck ... ran out
  54. Sounds in Space... by Funksaw · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Okay, yes, the trailer implies that there are sounds in space in this version. 1) This is a trailer, not the final cut. There may be no sounds in space in the final version. 2) "No sounds in space" was more of a gimmick than anything else. Anyone who sees the reaver ship and Serenity passing each other extremely slowly - even though both ships would be moving extremely fast in order to get to a destination millions of miles away - knows that Firefly wasn't hard SF - I don't even think they established whether they had FTL tech or not. Ditching "no sounds in space" isn't a storybreaker. I mean, honestly, did you go and watch the original because it was silent? 3) Who is to say that the "space" scenes don't take place in some sort of atmosphere?

    1. Re:Sounds in Space... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, space scenes in atmosphere! Boy, that makes perfect sense. Why didn't I think of that?

    2. Re:Sounds in Space... by cfalcon · · Score: 1

      That seen bugged me (more disturbing is the fact that they would be anywhere close to each other unless they were going between the same two points). There's others like it.

      But it's still the hardest SF I've ever seen on TV.

      Oh, they made some comment in the pilot at least, something about "rabbitting", which I assumed was their FTL. But it shows up a bunch: the glowy-butt part of Serenity glows and a pretty burst emanates, and poof, they are gone.

      Still harder scifi than you'll see outside of a novel.

    3. Re:Sounds in Space... by Junta · · Score: 1

      I actually explained that away as the ships slowing down intentionally, the reaver ship to test the reaction of the Serenity, and Serenity doing so in order to behave just as they need to in order show recognition that they had the proper amount of fear of the reavers.

      Same might apply to why they were so close against all odds, the reaver ship diverting its course to screw with the people on Serenity's head for the hell of it.

      Of course, it seems strange considering how instinctive the reavers were supposed to be and it seems too tame a pasttime for them to bother with...

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    4. Re:Sounds in Space... by MegaFur · · Score: 1

      I think that says more about the softness of TV/movie SF than it does about the hardness of Firefly's stuff.

      uh, but don't get me wrong--I'm not meaning to diss Firefly in anyway--I think it's totally, totally cool. :-)

      --
      Furry cows moo and decompress.
    5. Re:Sounds in Space... by mbbac · · Score: 1

      There are actually a few space scenes in the trailer that don't have sound other than the soundtrack playing throughout the entire trailer. I noticed this the second time I watched the trailer. Most of the space craft scenes take place within an atmosphere.

      --

      mbbac

    6. Re:Sounds in Space... by Gulthek · · Score: 1

      Rent Babylon 5. It's a little dated by today's standards, but at the time it was a groundbreaking series. Inertia...in space! Used in combat! True it did fall back to sound in space, but ... inertia!

  55. Re:unjust? by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 1

    Someone who quotes Futurama is telling me to get a life. Incontrovertible proof: I'm about as lame as they come.

    --

    You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

  56. Re:re:re all the way home by computerme · · Score: 1

    Crackers don't matter!

  57. Re:Looks really, really cool... but... by prator · · Score: 2

    I agree with the other reply to your post. I think this has been trailerized for the general public. Also, I'm hoping that the sounds in space was a trailer thing too.

    -prator

  58. Re:unjust? by jaymzter · · Score: 1

    Someone pissed off about remarks concerning a TV show is amazed when someone quotes another TV show at them.

    I've just walked into a Kevin Smith movie

    --
    If thou see a fair woman pay court to her, for thus thou wilt obtain love
  59. Re:Browncoats == greycoats by redbeard_ak · · Score: 3, Informative

    The conflict before the movie is akin to the US Civil War. The colony planets (in a "state's rights" fashion) resist domination by the Alliance. (No slavery in the story though so no idealogical high ground for the Alliance).

    The frontier is much like the American West after the Civil War. The Alliance is powerful but remote authority. Some of the main characters were rebels and wore brown (thus brown coats) much like some western characters (ie, the Outlaw Josey Wales) were former confederates.

    --
    . This sig unintentionally left blank. I meant to put something here, but I'm busy.
  60. hilarious ending by Karma+Sucks · · Score: 1

    "I'm unarmed"
    "Good!" [bang]

    That was just for the fans, weren't it. :-)

    --
    (Please browse at -1 to read this comment.)
  61. To the people worried about the Music... by Fearan · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I also thought about this when seeing the trailer. Then I remembered The Two Towers trailer using a remix of the theme song from Requiem for a Dream, which was a bitttt more techno than the LOTR soundtrack. Honestly, right now I'm not worried. Trailer makes it look rather good.

    Kind of dissapointed to not have seen Book in the trailer, and only a few frames with Kayle (sp?), but you have to remember that 2 hours will not provide the same amount of room to develop 6-7 characters effectively. And Josh usually focuses on character in his series, going in depth about each one. So let him do his thing of focusing on key cast properly, and maybe we'll see more of the rest in other installments?

    Hell... Maybe we'll get to see it back on TV one day? (I know I'm crossing my fingers, although Mr. Whedon has said he will not return Firefly to TV... money does make people change ideas, as seen with Family Guy.)

  62. Gotta see original Firefly series, pobably by Tamerlan · · Score: 1

    MHO. I probably have to see original series to get it, but that trailer did not strike me at all. I remember seeing Matrix trailers. They were breathtaking. It was like "Whoaaa, this is gonna be BIG!". I do not have that feeling now. In fact, "6th sense" and "The forgotten" trailers were more exciting (yeah, that may be apples to oranges, but I'm talking about overall impression).

    1. Re:Gotta see original Firefly series, pobably by ilyaaohell · · Score: 1

      I'm with you on that. I had a really pedestrian opinion while watching the movie. Not impressive in the slightest, the most jarring thing to me being that the sets look like they were made for television.

      The one thing the trailer did have that I enjoyed was the cool look of the spaceships flying around. However, that jarred pretty badly with the seemingly low budget of everything else.

      From a dramatic sense, the trailer is also disappointing because, not only did it not get me excited to see this film, but I was also lost on what the hell is going on. It set up nothing about what I was watching. It was basically, "Ok, so here are a bunch of spaceships. Here are a bunch of actors you've never heard of. Here are the actors shooting guns. Here's some woman who climbs on cielings. Oh, by the way, this is written by the legendary guy-you've-never-heard-of-in-your-life who is responsible for the incredibly awesome WB network television!!"

      Excuse me if I get no emotional response to this.

      I'm well aware that legitimate opinions not shared by the majority are invariably marked as trolls. I'm not trolling, I'm merely giving my opinion as someone who has not seen a single episode of this TV show. Considering the show's low ratings, and disregarding the fanboyishness on Slashdot, I'm in the vast majority of the movie's target demographic -- people who have zero emotional investment in Firefly or this movie's hype. If they respond the way I have to this trailer (more than likely they will), this movie will be a huge flop.

      Now allow me to watch and shake my head in disbelief as I STILL get marked as a troll or "overrated" simply because some fanboys disagree with my honest to god opinion as someone who is not a fanboy.

      --
      UNIX: A computer user is defined as a programmer. WINDOWS: A computer user is defined as a consumer.
    2. Re:Gotta see original Firefly series, pobably by RupW · · Score: 1

      The show *was* good, but it started off mediocre which probably didn't help. I agree, the trailer didn't do that much for me on the first view and I'm a fan of the TV show. The best episodes on the DVD set are in the second half but you need to sit through the rest to know what's going on - and the first few are still pretty good, just a 'B+' not an 'A'. The pilot is overlong, though.

      Oh, by the way, this is written by the legendary guy-you've-never-heard-of-in-your-life who is responsible for the incredibly awesome WB network television!!"

      Absolutely. "Loved on the internet" is pointless too: in a big enough population you'll find someone willing to say anything, witness Jerry Springer.

      Here are a bunch of actors you've never heard of.

      A handful have been in high-profile stuff - e.g., discounting Buffy/Angel, Alan Tudyk was recently in Dodgeball and (sort of) I, Robot, and plenty of films before that; Gina Torres was a regular guest in Alias series 1, Adam Baldwin has had a film career since Full Metal Jacket.

    3. Re:Gotta see original Firefly series, pobably by demon · · Score: 1

      And don't forget Jewel Staite! She's been in Wonderfalls (disappointingly cancelled as well) and Dead Like Me (same, sadly)... I think she's made some other appearances as well. Where are you? Please come out! Man, she is hot. :)

      --

      Sam: "That was needlessly cryptic."
      Max: "I'd be peeing my pants if I wore any!"
    4. Re:Gotta see original Firefly series, pobably by j-turkey · · Score: 1
      And don't forget Jewel Staite! She's been in Wonderfalls (disappointingly cancelled as well) and Dead Like Me (same, sadly)

      Who did she play in Dead Like Me?

      --

      -Turkey

    5. Re:Gotta see original Firefly series, pobably by demon · · Score: 1

      She was only in one episode. She was the punk rock chick in the record store - the one that Mason got it on with.

      --

      Sam: "That was needlessly cryptic."
      Max: "I'd be peeing my pants if I wore any!"
  63. If only we could get a Red Dwarf movie. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd be much more excited.

  64. To hell with Book. Wheres the cute mechanic chick? by Pizaz · · Score: 1

    I didn't see her in the trailer... but that doesnt necessarily mean she's not in the movie i guess.

  65. Let me be the first to say by Mordaximus · · Score: 1

    He chu sheng za jiao de zang huo!

    1. Re:Let me be the first to say by jfengel · · Score: 1

      It's down the hall, on the right. There's extra toilet paper in the cabinet.

  66. Re:To hell with Book. Wheres the cute mechanic chi by Pizaz · · Score: 1

    never mind, she's in there in the scene where they are all on the bridge 9.5 seconds into the trailer.

  67. Not a fan, but this looks good! by Enoch+Root · · Score: 1

    I'm a huge SF fan, although I tend to stick to books rather than TV. (I haven't been gripped by a SF TV series since B5.) I tried, really TRIED, to get into Firefly while it was on TV. I like Whedon a lot, and I was excited about Firefly. I set my VCR to record it every Friday.

    Truth is, you know... It wasn't that good. I watched 4-5 episodes, and although the dialog was snappy, the characters felt flat, and the setting was give-and-take. The idea of a Western in space is good as a CONCEPT, if you transpose it intelligently. But in the case of Firefly, it felt really silly: people having Colt-type pistols, a lot of horses and wagons... It felt like the SF had no place in it at all, and was just dressing.

    In short, I gave up on Firefly, not because of the schedule or the stupid TV execs, but because I just didn't like it all that much. It was sub-par. I'm sorry to say this, but in my opinion, Firefly could have made it despite the atrocious time slot IF it had been truly exceptional. They had everything against them, yes, but the series wasn't, say, 'X-Files Season 1 good' or 'Babylon 5 good' to survive these odds.

    That being said, this trailer looks good, and even though I stopped watching Firefly, I want to see Serenity. I'm not expecting a lot from the movie, but it seems action-packed, well-done, and the dialog seems to be really good.

    I understand why they toned down the Western stuff in the trailer, because it would look really silly to the people who haven't seen the series. I suspect it's all still in there. It sounds like the trailer is a success all around, because even as a non-fan, this movie sounds exciting.

    1. Re:Not a fan, but this looks good! by Digitalia · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Unfortunately, your assertion that science fiction must depict a technological utopia is disheartening. You are definitely a core-worlder/first-worlder. You've never seen the technological inadequacies in the fringes of the third-world, and so you think that high technology must suffuse the world.

      As for the characters, we were really being given a small glimpse into their nature. Had the series continued, Joss would have fleshed out their character quite readily. It's a much more realistic method for depicting a rich and multifaceted character. This is in stark contrast to the unoriginal caricature characters from B5, which need less than 5 minutes of screen time to fully reveal their entire raison d'etre.

      --
      Pax Digitalia
    2. Re:Not a fan, but this looks good! by Enoch+Root · · Score: 1

      Your assertion of my assertion is all the more disheartening, because it is false. Like I said, I'm all for Western-style fringe-world low-tech, and that's a great basis. At that level, the parallel between SF and Western is great.

      What's not great is when said low-tech is ripped off of Westerns. That is destroying a cool analogy, and replacing it with a lame 'Western... in SPACE!' setting.

      Watching Firefly, I always felt Josh Whedon understood perfectly the line between 'inspired by Western setting' and 'giving the main characters Colts', but the Producers or the network was not that bright and pushed for stupid cowboy stuff.

      That being said, about the characters, your distinction is artificial. Good character hooks, an good character developments, are not mutually exclusive. It was entirely possible to make interesting characters from the get-go; that's precisely the case of Buffy, for instance.

    3. Re:Not a fan, but this looks good! by SpryGuy · · Score: 1

      FOX ruined FireFly by not showing the 2 hour "premier", starting with the second episode, and then showing most of the rest out of order.

      It almost lost me as well, but I toughed it out, and by the end of its run, the last four episodes, I was hooked. In fact, the last episode aired -- Objects in Space -- is one of the best hours of drama I've ever seen on TV.

      I bought the DVD set when it came out and watched them in order, and was stunned at how much I liked it, including episodes I hated when I saw it on TV. It's amazing how much having the background information from the 2-hour pilot helps, as well as seeing them in order.

      Give it a chance. Rent the DVDs from NetFlix, or just buy the DVD set and watch them through in order. I think you'll be pleasantly surprised. It's a very rich and interesting universe, with some really complex and interesting characters. And the unaired episodes are quite good as well.

      And word has it that there isn't much in the way of 'western stuff' in the movie itself ... just like in the series, the western stuff sorta faded in to the backgroudn when they were dealing with Alliance planets (i.e. not stuck out on back-water planets), and dealing with the River story (which is the primary story of this movie).

      --

      - Spryguy
      There are three kinds of people in this world: those that can count and those that can't
    4. Re:Not a fan, but this looks good! by Goose3254 · · Score: 1

      I've tried to watch B5.

      I've seen 6 or 8 episodes from various seasons, and the series just sucked in my opinion. It was like "let's roll every overdone sci-fi cliche into one series and use cheap cheesy special effects to boot...WOW we can get Bruce Boxenleiter and Flounder from Animial House to star?...COOOOOL"

      Aside from a suck-ass timeslot, showing the episodes out of order, and preempting it at any and all opportunities, the only thing Fox could have done to do more damage to a good televison series like "Firefly" was to air commercials saying "Don't watch this show, we're just going to cancel it soon and replace it with "Temptation Island", because everyone knows smart people like to watch train wrecks disguised as reality TV."

  68. Looks quality by UlfGabe · · Score: 1

    looks nice, a tad hype;

    'one of the top 10 movies you will see this year'
    blah
    blah
    blah
    ect.

    IDCAEMCR
    (i dont care about extraneous movie critic reviews)

    ill probably watch it. I noticed a bit of a Death star in the background... some kind of metallic moon.

    --
    Check journal for info on Anti-TextBook, an idea by me.
  69. And it doesn't crash your desktop? by Dimensio · · Score: 1

    MplayerPlugin destabilizes Firefox for me. Sure, the video plays fine, but later my browser will spontaneously crash. I can do it regularly and reliably if I choose File->Save at any time after MplayerPlugin has run.

    1. Re:And it doesn't crash your desktop? by luna69 · · Score: 1

      > STOP MISUSING APOSTROPHES

      Hallelujah!

      Now all we need is a similar site for its/it's, there/their/they're, you're/your/yore, site/sight, et cetera.

      --
      No gods, no demons, and no masters. Secular Humanism!
    2. Re:And it doesn't crash your desktop? by goaty_the_flying_sho · · Score: 1

      Same thing happened here until I upgraded. Works perfectly. I noticed it got a new logo too. mplayerplug-in 2.80 mplayer 1.0pre6

    3. Re:And it doesn't crash your desktop? by Dimensio · · Score: 1

      I was thinking of setting up a little web sight for people who don't understand when their supposed to use the variants of the homonyms that you listed, as its really annoying to see such misuse. It makes me want to shout, "Your all a bunch of idiots!"

  70. Firefly?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did Pheonix/Firebird/Firefox change it's name again?

  71. wow by Jett · · Score: 1

    I never watched Firefly when it was on TV but had heard so many good things about it I ordered it via Netflix. I still can't believe they cancelled that show, it was by far one of the best shows ever on TV. My wife, who isn't normally into scifi even got into it - I made her watch the first disk and she was hooked.

    The movie looks awesome, from the trailer it looks like it will rehash some of the main plot from the TV series but the fact that the movie was even made is enough to set aside my complaints. Hopefully it does well enough to get some sequels made or perhaps even the series revived on TV.

  72. Re:Looks really, really cool... but... by jeblucas · · Score: 4, Funny
    I still feel a bit let down that I didn't hear "Burn the land and boil the sea, you can't take the sky from me" in the preview...
    Oh I so hate that theme song. So, so , soooooo much. I said Chinese cursewords every time it played.
    --
    blarg.
  73. Important breaking dupe news! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    It's not a dupe!

    Please recall all Dupe Detector forces and stand down. Thank you.

  74. Because it's what people expect by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

    Why is there suddenly sounds in space?!?

    Have you never seen a movie trailer?
    Other questions you might have asked: Why are things not happening in the same chronological sequence as they will in the movie? Why is it so short? Why is there catchy music tht won't end up in the movie?

    Because: It's an advertisement, not the movie itself.

    You think that silent shots of spacecrafts make Joe Sixpack want to shell out good money for movie tickets? They don't.

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

  75. Browncoats? by ediron2 · · Score: 1

    (Let's dial up the old wayback machine...bzzt, brrrr-up... kading!)

    Shh... there's Joss, working on an early manuscript:

    JW (to self): These guys need a casual nickname... uh... rough riders... nah. What else has there been? Redcoats, bluebellies, brownshirts, blues, greys, black ninjas... let's try a color and article of clothing... red-gstring? eew, ick!... green-pants? (snorted laugh) Uh, brownpants... nope, that's almost worse. Brownshirt? nah, think that's the nazis. Ugh. Redcoats? Goldcoats? Nah, too real-estate and only an idiot would wear a gold uniform into battle. Greencoats? Nah, that's the manager at a holiday inn, isn't it?... greycoats? Not bad. Bluecoats? Browncoats? Browncoats. yeah, that'll do!

    (alt version):

    (Costumer) Hey, Joss, we have all these old brown jackets. Wanna use 'em?
    (JW): Cool, rebel uniforms!!!

    (alt alt version):

    (JW): Heh, I could make that scruffy canvas jacket I wore in high school into a fashion statement!

    (We now return you to your regularly scheduled programming...)

    Suspecting (without seeing the show) that, because the uniform nickname had the same color as Nazi brownshirts it is therefore laden with meaning, is pretty absurd. This would be even clearer for you after watching the series: a ragtag bunch of rural individualists that got their butts kicked by an empire in *no* way makes me think 'nazi'. At least not with respect to the losers.

    To be fair, something minor like generic uniform colors aren't symbolism; if that sort of symbolism was intended, most authors would use other parallels/cues to reaffirm the symbolism. And there's plenty of other submaterial in Firefly, so why bother?

    1. Re:Browncoats? by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      Suspecting (without seeing the show) that, because the uniform nickname had the same color as Nazi brownshirts it is therefore laden with meaning, is pretty absurd.

      Every thread will have someone invoke Godwin.
      He should have been modded down as troll, not up as insightfull. Would have saved us all a great deal of pointless replies.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

  76. No Greedo here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    so, what joss whedon is making sure is that we know Mal shot first?... : P

  77. "Unjustly"? by eric.t.f.bat · · Score: 0, Troll

    "Unjustly cancelled"? It was Enterprise Meets Bonanza. It didn't get cancelled early enough.

    Next you'll be lamenting the loss of Muppet Trek, aka Farscape. Good grief!

    --
    I have discovered a truly remarkable .sig block which this margin is too small to conta
    1. Re:"Unjustly"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Says someone who never watched it I bet.

      Some of the shows never aired. Some I can understand why, for example the lesbian scene, the scene where the bounty hunter explaining in detail how he will rape and kill the engineer (disturbing but excellent episode).

      It also shows the bad guys are sometimes the good guys and makes fun with all the cliche crap that you see in most shows.

      Enterprise isn't even in the same league.

  78. no Further installments by aapold · · Score: 1

    Don't know if anything changed since then, but at the Firefly panel at Dragoncon last year, Nate and Jewel both said that this was the final firefly project (said it wasn't up to them)...

    --
    "Waste not one watt!" - CZ
  79. six rebels on the run... by aapold · · Score: 1

    THat was the blurb. Six rebels. I got a bit worried at first. In the trailer, the only ones I saw were: 1 - Mal 2 - Zoe 3 - Wash 4 - Jayne 5 - Dr Tams 6 - summer Now.. I know Kaylee is in the movie. She talked about it at Dragoncon last year (even noted how she was much thinner in the movie than in the TV show and was worried Josh would make her put it back on but he ended up letting it go). And I've read that Book was also signed for it. So I guess the six are Mal, Zoe, Wash, Jayne, Book and Kaylee, with that blurb not counting the other two.

    --
    "Waste not one watt!" - CZ
    1. Re:six rebels on the run... by PaganRitual · · Score: 1

      inara and the shepard aren't rebels on the run. they are just part of the team.

  80. Re:Unjustly canceled? by luna69 · · Score: 1

    Is it possible to mod someone down infinitely?

    If so, I draw your attention to...parent.

    --
    No gods, no demons, and no masters. Secular Humanism!
  81. Not quite... satisfying. by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 1

    I'm going to go see it, and drool like all the rest of y'all, but...

    Total length of all three movies, if they get made, in the best case: six hours. Total runtime of the three full seasons (or so) we'd have if Fox hadn't killed the show: fifty hours.

    It'll be nice to see them all again, but the universe once promised is dead, and dead for good. This just makes it hurt a little more. There's a kind of world-building you can do in television that you can't do in movies. We won't be seeing any more of it.

    For fuck's sake, just compare the best Babylon 5 eps to the TV movies. Some stories are better told in certain formats.

    Just makes me so damn sad.

    --grendel drago

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
    1. Re:Not quite... satisfying. by SpryGuy · · Score: 1

      I'm still hoping against hope that the movie does well, maybe a sequel movie does well too, and then HBO or ShowTime or SciFi pick up the series for another TV run. But damn, that's a long time to wait... and it probably won't happen anyway.

      --

      - Spryguy
      There are three kinds of people in this world: those that can count and those that can't
  82. Re:Unjustly canceled? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a troll you rate quite low.

    Some points to help you troll better.
    - There are no aliens in firefly.
    - Of the girls in the show only one is a fighter and tends to use a gun.
    - No one does crazy karate kicks and punches.

  83. Re:sound in space? oh well, itll be better than h2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As someone else has already mentioned, it looks like the sound in space might be due to the ships being at the edge of the atmosphere - so sound will still be transmitted.

    And HGGTTG is NOT going to suck :)

  84. Sound in space??!!! by flikx · · Score: 1

    Great trailer, but I swear that I hear zooming spaceships and gunshots ... in space. Argh. Maybe the studio dubbed it in for the trailer, but if there is sound in space in this movie, I'm sending out plenty of blue gloves and apples.

    Ruin anything else from the series, but Firefly stands apart as one of the few (only?) shows/films/etc. which don't feature spaceships sounding like WW-II era bombers ... in SPACE!!!

    --
    One future, two choices. Oppose them or let them destroy us.
    1. Re:Sound in space??!!! by Capt_Troy · · Score: 1

      I remember one episode in the series (Where Jane was shooting at something through space) and it was completly silent. Maybe this is just my bad memory, but it seems like there was at least an attempt to do the no sound in space thing.

    2. Re:Sound in space??!!! by RupW · · Score: 1

      I remember one episode in the series (Where Jane was shooting at something through space) and it was completly silent. Maybe this is just my bad memory, but it seems like there was at least an attempt to do the no sound in space thing.

      Yes, that'd have been Our Mrs. Reynolds.

      The TV show did no-sound-in-space throughout - which is why everyone's commenting on the sound in the trailer. It's mentioned on the DVD commentary that they made conscious choices to do no-sound-in-space and no-aliens to set Firefly apart from other space shows.

  85. Sound in space.. by Odinson · · Score: 1
    I wouldn't worry about the sound in space much. If you notice all of those scenes were in close proximity to a planet.

    A planet of unknown gravity.

    A planet of unknown atospheric content (refractive qualities) or circumference.

    Did you notice some of the burn trails on wings of the firefly "in space"?

    I once successfully argued, "It only takes a little bit a gas to make a lot of noise" about the validity of sound effects next to the death star. How embarasing. :) Of course the rest of the SW space noise is bunk.

    1. Re:Sound in space.. by pogle · · Score: 1

      Thank you! I was initially shocked they had the sound in space, until I noticed the proximity to the planet and what appeared to be atmospheric distortions around the ship. I'd mod you up if I hadnt been posting here.

      --
      http://thechubbyferret.net - Ferret pictures and informative links.
  86. Re:Looks really, really cool... but... by Charcharodon · · Score: 1
    Well that was the trailer and even the show had its share of hightech worlds, it just happened that most of the time they hid out on the fringes which had a definite wild west feel to them.

    Even the train robbery episode, if i do recall had a maglev train, which was a nice tip of the hat to sci-fi and western themes.

  87. Re:Unjustly canceled? by realitybath1 · · Score: 0

    intergalactic pimp much?

  88. Newsflash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Right-hand is geeked out watching trailer

    nuff said

  89. Fartfly by Pablo+El+Vagabundo · · Score: 1

    I really tried to like this series, but the whole western theme really put me off. Now I like westerns set in 1800's, but it does not fly for my set in the future. I could not suspend my disbelief. Same for buffy or angel for me, so I guess I'm in the minority. I am wondering what the effect american culture will have on the future considering so many nations are going to be in space in the next 50 years. Looks like it will be a new frontier, but very different from a western:)... Pablo El Vagabundo

  90. Re:quiet is boring by lymph · · Score: 0
    I don't want to see stuff flying around that doesn't make noise, that's kinda boring.

    "Suspended disbelief" is another way to put it. You kinda have to do that to enjoy science fiction.

  91. Trailer URL Fullscreen by MicAttAck · · Score: 1

    For those who have linux, this might help:

    wget -U "User-Agent: iTunes/4.6 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X 10.3)" http://movies.apple.com/movies/universal/serenity/ serenity_ifs2.mov

    --

    -- MicAttAck
    Religon is an insult to human dignity.
    1. Re:Trailer URL Fullscreen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wget -U "User-Agent: iTunes/4.6 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X 10.3)" http://movies.apple.com/movies/universal/serenity/ serenity_ifs2.mov

      Maybe they've changed it now, but you didn't need the user agent hack when I downloaded it twelve hours ago.

  92. Only one question about your GF by unassimilatible · · Score: 1
    What is her battery life? I'd be most impressed if she was running on a fuel cell.

    --
    Slashdot "libertarians": Small government for me, big government for those I disagree with. -1, I disagree with you
  93. ObSimpsons by Kjella · · Score: 1

    Screw Star Wars Episode 3 With a big rubber dick. I'll wait until it comes out on DVD and I can rent it.

    "That's my half-assed dad. You were mad enough to leave our house, but not mad enough to leave our property."

    Somehow, I don't think Lucas is too concerned with someone "screwing SW3" by "only" renting it on DVD (and maybe buy it later).

    Kjella

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    1. Re:ObSimpsons by MourningBlade · · Score: 1

      Somehow, I don't think Lucas is too concerned with someone "screwing SW3" by "only" renting it on DVD (and maybe buy it later).

      Not intending to hurt Lucas. My use of "screw" was unclear. In my local vernacular, screw can mean both "harm" and "not taking that option" - usually the latter.

      "I could brush the floor with a toothbrush, but screw that. I'll go rent a floor buffer - you can ride those."

      Admittedly around here we see a lot of "boycott ____! Don't buy any of ______!"

      Mostly, I'm just sad that Star Wars has been downgraded on my list from "theatre" to "rent when I get around to it." It's still interesting, and I'd like to see it - but Firefly IS something I want to see in the theatre.

      And I'm certain Lucas doesn't care either way about me personally or my actions.

    2. Re:ObSimpsons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Somehow, I don't think Lucas is too concerned with someone "screwing SW3" by "only" renting it on DVD (and maybe buy it later).

      With his ego, he probably isn't to concerned that I paid to see EpI in the theater and have no plans to ever watch EpII. I'll watch EpIII if I hear it's a decent movie, but I doubt it will be.

    3. Re: ObSimpsons by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1


      > > Screw Star Wars Episode 3 With a big rubber dick. I'll wait until it comes out on DVD and I can rent it.

      > Somehow, I don't think Lucas is too concerned with someone "screwing SW3" by "only" renting it on DVD

      Yes, but he might be a bit concerned about the "big rubber dick" part.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  94. Re:Browncoats == greycoats by CamMac · · Score: 1

    Actually, slavery is mentioned in at least one episode. In the opening bar room brawl of "The Train Job" Capt. Mal gets into a bar fight with a slaver, although not over the issue of slavery. Later Inara, attempting to get Mal and Zoe out of prison, refers to him as her indentured property. For those missin' out on a little American history, indentured servitude provided the northern states with alot immigrants and decent portion of the work force. Indentured servitude was effectively abolished at the same time slavery was. While the differences between slavery and indentured servitude are radical, don't believe that the North held the higher moral ground because it didn't rob people of their personal rights. The North held the moral high ground because of its treatment of people whose personal freedoms it had robbed.

    In "Safe" when two members of the crew are kidnapped to be forced to join the population of a desperate mountain town, the local authorities don't react. Both these episodes touched on slavery enough to let us know that Yes, slavery did exist in the 'verse. However, considering that the Alliance was not going through great lengths to put a stop to it, I doubt that it was the cause of the strife between the Independence and the Alliance. Instead, I'm willing to bet the conflict was caused by unfair taxation and tariffs, and laws that favored the more industrialized planets closer to the core. While often ignored by high school history books, these were secondary issues that lead to the American Civil war, and would fit with Joss Whedon's using the Civil war as an insperation for the series.

    --
    All jocks think about is sports. All nerds think about is sex.
  95. Kaylee by J_Omega · · Score: 1

    was the one I didn't notice. =(

    1. Re:Kaylee by Eris13 · · Score: 1, Informative

      She's there. Stop the trailer at the point where you see several actors on the bridge. She's in at least two shots.

      The plants growing on Wash's console though are concerning....

    2. Re:Kaylee by Johnny+Mnemonic · · Score: 1


      Kaylee is there. I had to scrub the video to see her, but she's indeed in there in a few spots. And the actress (Jewel Staite) has maintained a public blog that indicates a strong interest in the film, as well as mentioning time she spent shooting it, so I don't think there's much fear of her being left out.

      But, and this was true in the series as well, her character doesn't participate in "crime" very much, so when much of the action is off ship, she doesn't get a lot of screen time. "Shindig" to be excepted, of course.

      Wash is there too--he has some lines and is in a few scenes. I think the one that we're missing is Book--hopefully he'll come back for later movies (or, hope against hope, the Renewed TV Series.)

      --

      --
      $tar -xvf .sig.tar
    3. Re:Kaylee by STrinity · · Score: 2, Informative

      The plants growing on Wash's console though are concerning....

      That's This Land where the dinosaurs live.

      --
      Les Miserables Volume 1 now up with my reading of
  96. Han Solo reference by ChocoboLee · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one to notice the subtle reference to the Han Solo and Greedo's who shoots first mess that George Lucas created? Unlike Han Solo who did not (according to Lucas) shoot before he was shot at, Malcolm Reynolds will shoot an unarmed man. :) Whether or not this is what actually happens in the movie, we'll just have to wait and see. But I think this reference is definitely not accidental!

    1. Re:Han Solo reference by RichMan · · Score: 1

      > Malcolm Reynolds will shoot an unarmed man.

      An unarmed man who it looks like wiped out a village or three on his way to locate River.

      Frontier justice straight up.

    2. Re:Han Solo reference by ab762 · · Score: 1
      One thing I like about Mal Reynolds (or Whedon) is that he doesn't scrupple to simply kill his enemies. At least two people in the TV series were killed under circumstances of being tied up and/or surrendered.

      "Daddy, why'd you shoot that man in the back?"

      "Well, son, it's like this: he's dead, and I'm alive, and that's the way I wanted to be."

    3. Re:Han Solo reference by AussieVamp2 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, SOMETIMES he will do what Avon would do

  97. Uh oh.... by Phil+Urich · · Score: 1

    Better be careful, though, she's got pop-ups.

    --
    I remember sigs. Oh, a simpler time!
  98. Re:I'd mod you up... Re:Serenity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Doesn't matter, +funny mods don't affect karma. I'd post non-AC for moderation but I'm no karma whore.

  99. Re:quiet is boring by 91degrees · · Score: 1

    That's not the point.

    Firefly doesn't have sounds in space. It's part of the "look". The series uses music to add atmosphere instead. It works, so shouldn't be changed.

  100. Re:sound in space? oh well, itll be better than h2 by BlakeCaldwell · · Score: 1

    have you read the reviews? heard how all the good dialog was mangled? see the trailer promotes mainly just slapstick?

    zaphrod's got one head? i read somewhere the other head is in his nose? face it, man. it's gonna suck.

    but, if it'll make ya feel any better... "it's going to be the best movie ever!" oh, and, "santa claus is real!" ... but not the easter bunny... that's a crock of ish.

  101. Re:quiet is boring by RupW · · Score: 1

    Firefly doesn't have sounds in space. It's part of the "look". The series uses music to add atmosphere instead. It works, so shouldn't be changed.

    It worked where it was used - in short bursts in the middle of a sequence that weren't the whole piece of the action. That might have changed for the film.

  102. Sound Effects? by nahdude812 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Am I the only one who noticed that there were sound effects in space? I really hope this is only in the trailer, and that the actual movie stays true to the series by removing the sound effects from the space scenes.

    It was the first space scene sans engine noises, that first completely hooked me on Firefly. I couldn't believe someone writing sci-fi actually obeyed the laws of physics in this sense. And the soundlessness of it, filled instead with that guitar drawl, really lent a feeling of surrealness, and in fact, I thought it made space seem like a lot scarier place than any other sci-fi had ever managed -- the thought of being stranded out there, in utter silence, alone and forever, really got me.

    1. Re:Sound Effects? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Am I the only one who noticed that there were sound effects in space?

      No. See most of the other comments here :-p

    2. Re:Sound Effects? by TychoCelchuuu · · Score: 1

      I thought 2001 had soundless space. Guess my memory's going :/

      --
      Against stupidity the Gods themselves contend in vain.
  103. No Preacher? by dingosatemybaby · · Score: 1

    Did I miss something in the trailer or is The Shepherd Book missing?

    1. Re:No Preacher? by Plexust · · Score: 1

      No, he is in the movie, I assure you.

  104. Re:sound in space? oh well, itll be better than h2 by BlakeCaldwell · · Score: 1

    btw, ya, that's what i thought too - that they were on the edge of an atmosphere so that's where the sound came from, but i don't think that's it. they're way too far out, and the whole trailer shows outer space scenes making sound..

    dunno man.

  105. Re:Browncoats == greycoats by SamSim · · Score: 1

    The Alliance is powerful but remote authority

    That sounds more like the American War of Independence to me.

  106. Sequels would be nice, but... by kronocide · · Score: 1

    What I really want is the series back. The kind of character and story development you can do in movies is so limited compared to a TV series. There is no way it'll be the same. And anyway, I'd like to see the story continued from where the series left off.

    And did anyone else think that the black bad guy in the trailer seemed a lot less impressive than the bad guy (on whom I suppose the movie one was based) from Objects In Space?

    1. Re:Sequels would be nice, but... by RupW · · Score: 1

      And did anyone else think that the black bad guy in the trailer seemed a lot less impressive than the bad guy (on whom I suppose the movie one was based) from Objects In Space?

      I agree - the guy in Objects In Space looked like the soldier he was supposed to be. This guy looks more like he should be presenting kids TV :-/

      I could understand if he was the leader of the hunter force, not a soldier, but there's a clip of him unsheathing a sword. Lawrence Fishburne's kung-fu bits in the second Matrix suffered because he, well, didn't look physically up to it - let's hope this guy pulls it off better.

      I also thought some of his emotion was wrong, especially the "I kill children" bit which I didn't really buy. It should have been hard-stare-forceful with a smile in the eyes rather than with his mouth. But that's possibly the direction :-/

    2. Re:Sequels would be nice, but... by pogle · · Score: 1

      I'm wondering if the killing children bit wasnt editted to be deliberately misleading; you'll notice it wasnt one continual scene, but it jumped around a bit, so its quite possible that it was placed there deliberately out of context. Movie trailers (sadly) do that all the time.

      --
      http://thechubbyferret.net - Ferret pictures and informative links.
    3. Re:Sequels would be nice, but... by RupW · · Score: 1

      I'm wondering if the killing children bit wasnt editted to be deliberately misleading; you'll notice it wasnt one continual scene, but it jumped around a bit, so its quite possible that it was placed there deliberately out of context. Movie trailers (sadly) do that all the time.

      Yeah, I did wonder about that. Happens a lot in "last time on..." episode recaps too, e.g. the West Wing. It is an excellent way to set the tone for he character though so I'd guessed it was written. But either way the trailer didn't work for it :-/

    4. Re:Sequels would be nice, but... by kronocide · · Score: 1

      True. Another sequence that seems to have been "creatively edited" is the one where he says "I'm unarmed..." and then Mal answers "Good" and shoots (something, presumably him). It's obviously edited, so one wonders what Mal _really_ answered "Good" to.

    5. Re:Sequels would be nice, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sequels would be nice, but... (Score:1)
      by kronocide (209440) on Wednesday April 27, @09:02AM (#12357953)

      What I really want is the series back. The kind of character and story development you can do in movies is so limited compared to a TV series. There is no way it'll be the same. And anyway, I'd like to see the story continued from where the series left off.

      And did anyone else think that the black bad guy in the trailer seemed a lot less impressive than the bad guy (on whom I suppose the movie one was based) from Objects In Space?


      What makes you think that Chiwetel Ejiofor's character is based on on Jubal Early (Richard Brooks)? Because they're both black?

      To the guy who thinks that Ejiofor "should be presenting kids TV :-/," run, don't walk to the video store and get Dirty Pretty Things. Audrey Tautou was given top-billing in the United States simply because American audiences were familiar with her from Amelie , but Ejiofar is the star of the movie.

      As I recall, Jubal Early was a bounty hunter, not a soldier. And he was left to die in space at the end of the series. The chances of him being rescued were infinitesimally small, unless Zaphod and Trillian happened to engage the infinite-improbability drive at the right moment.
    6. Re:Sequels would be nice, but... by RupW · · Score: 1

      What makes you think that Chiwetel Ejiofor's character is based on on Jubal Early (Richard Brooks)? Because they're both black?

      He didn't say that at all. What they've got in common is they're both hunting River, and Early's also the only really comparible villain in the series to The Operative. We're saying Richard Brooks comes across more convincingly as a bad guy than Chiwetel Ejiofor's does in the trailer.

      To the guy who thinks that Ejiofor "should be presenting kids TV :-/,"

      I said *looks like*. I'm sure he's an excellent actor, he just doesn't *look* the part like Richard Brooks did.

      As I recall, Jubal Early was a bounty hunter, not a soldier. And he was left to die in space at the end of the series.

      Correct. Again, we're not saying that we want Jubal Early to be the villain here.

  107. Both Boot and Kaylee are in the movie by kronocide · · Score: 1

    ...at least according to IMDB.
    http://imdb.com/title/tt0379786/

  108. Unjustly...? by Marthisdil · · Score: 0

    ShinyHat writes "Browncoats Rejoice! The trailer for Joss Whedon's Serenity, based on his unjustly cancelled Firefly television series

    Funny - I thought that it was the networks' responsibility to cancel shows that didn't get "enough" viewership.

    Guess times have changed. As long as grandma and some guy in a closet in Lithuania watch a show, they better not cancel it, or it's "unjust"...riiight...

    1. Re:Unjustly...? by kronocide · · Score: 1

      Okay, stupidly cancelled then. No one has any idea how a show is going to do after 10 episodes. Most series mature after 2-3 years! Fact remains the series was good (and although the network has no responsibility to quality, only to the bottom line, I still feel that it matters on some level), and could have been moved to a better slot, and given a chance.

  109. Re:Browncoats == greycoats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just another observation: Wasn't the town where Jayne was the local hero (Jaynestown?) full of indentured servants? What were they called, mudders? Basically didn't earn enough to repay their debts and monthly living costs, and so stayed perpetually in service to the local authority.

  110. Re:unjust? by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 1

    Kevin Smith who? Stop trying to alienate me with your obscure references to popular culture!

    --

    You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

  111. HOLY CRAP! by PONA-Boy · · Score: 1

    Well fuck ME, folks! Ain't that trailer sumthin' else? I likes me some serous action so's it looks like Joss is gonna serve some up!

    yeee-HAAW!

    -PONA-

    --
    +that's funny...I don't FEEL tardy.+
  112. Re:sound in space? oh well, itll be better than h2 by aziraphale · · Score: 1

    Yeah, man... I know. Firefly might have had great wit and flair and character, an immersive vision of an interesting future universe, but it didn't need all that - the ONE thing that made it was the fact that they had no sound in space.

    I mean, wow - the genius it must have taken to think that up! the boldness! the cheek! to go against every sci fi preconception and cliche and instead present a world where sound didn't propagate across a vacuum! Wow. It blew me away. I used to just rewind the DVD so I could watch - and hear - those silent space bits over and over again...

    Oh no, hang on. That's not true. I watched Firefly for the writing, the performances, and the plots. If (and I say IF) the film has sound in space, you know what? I reckon the plots and the characters will still be just as good.

    Call me crazy...

  113. Well... by Snaller · · Score: 1

    ... he is there.. for about 3 frames - behind Mal - about 1 minutte 57-58 seconds in.

    Why they don't show him more, who knows, perhaps they think young people don't want to see movies with old people? Or perhaps I'm just cynical.

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  114. So what? by SenorPez · · Score: 0
    Having watched Firefly, I think it deserved to be cancelled. So who cares about a movie made from an unsuccessful television show? Just what we've always wanted: More bad sci-fi.


    Oops. There's a mod down, since Firefly is on the "untouchable" list on Slashdot, right alongside Linux, HHGG, and Firefox.

  115. Sneek Preview Announced For May 5th by Recessive+Gene+Boy · · Score: 2, Informative
    I don't think anyone has posted this and it's probably too late to get modded up, but I'll try anyway. Apparently Joss posted in the boards over at http://browncoats.serenitymovie.com that there will be a sneak preview of the movie on May 5th in ten cities around the US. For those of you who don't want to register on the boards to see it I'll post it here...
    Well.

    It gets better.

    As thus: The movie is very nearly finished. You've seen many pretty images in the trailer. But I've still got work to do and you've still got months before you can see it. Unless.

    And, no, I'm not talking Australia (but Hi, Australia! anyway), I'm talking here in the more-or-less-United States, a one time multi-city Browncoat sneak event. Thursday, May 5th at 10:00 pm, the movie (Serenity! Pay attention! Jeez.) will be playing at exactly 10 theaters in 10 cities across the country. You (or possibly someone much like you) (or possibly a robot EXACTLY like you, but with better manners and sonic arm-lasers, sent to take your place) will be able to buy a ticket to see Serenity months in advance. Not just the bitty trailer with not enough Kaylee and Book, but the whole film, in its extremely almost completed state.

    You probably have some questions. How is this possible? What cities exactly will it be in? What are these changes my body is going through? All valid. It's possible because some clown put a bunch of Universal execs in a theater full of Browncoats and dude, they came out SWEATING, they never seen energy like that. They loved it, and even though they were already wicked supportive of the movie (see: earlier posts re: we're making the movie) they simply weren't ready for you guys. When I whinged on about pushing the date and everyone here was posting about "what do we do till September", they agreed to let me sneak it out.

    Maybe they thought it was a fluke. Maybe they wanna see if people really do care about the flick. Or maybe they're just treating us with respect and kindness, though that last option confuses and terrifies me as much as these changes my body is going through (I'm "perspiring" and becoming "interested in girls", which believe me is very unsettling when you're 40.) Does it matter? The plan works for me, and it can work for a select bunch of y'all. Here's what I know:

    The cities to be hit are:

    Seattle
    Austin
    Sacramento
    Boston
    Altanta
    Chicago
    San Francisco
    Las Vegas
    Denver
    The Portland of Oregon

    If you're in or near one of those, you might wanna stop by. There's supposed to be a "Can't Stop the Signal" page on this website (I don't know where it is -- hey, I remembered my damn password, doesn't that buy me any cred?) There should be more info there soon about how to get in, bringing peeps into the fold, I think there's even competetions and stuff. (All I know is I have exactly 20 Brownie points. I answered ONE triv Q and got it wrong. Forget cred. I have no cred.) Now a couple of us might just creep into one of those major metropolitan multiplexes to see if anyone does show up, so remember: swearing in Chinese ONLY.

    All right. This will please the fans and satisfy the employers of Joss Whedon, so I must stop as my arm-lasers are getting tired. I politely thank you for your attention.

    Should be fun.

    -j.

    My roomate just called to tell me the news. Apparently he was able to score 8 tickets for the Chicago showing.

    1. Re:Sneek Preview Announced For May 5th by kronocide · · Score: 1

      Thanks, that's cool info!

      My roomate just called to tell me the news. Apparently he was able to score 8 tickets for the Chicago showing.

      Aaahh!! Hate... joo!!11oneoneeleven

  116. Me too. by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 1

    I keep thinking that too, hoping against the impossible hope...

    I'm so pathetic. But at least I'm not alone.

    --grendel drago

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
  117. 2 by 2, quotes of blue by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

    No power in the 'verse can stop me.
    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

  118. Re:Browncoats == greycoats by johnjay · · Score: 1

    "Some of the main characters were rebels and wore brown (thus brown coats) much like some western characters (ie, the Outlaw Josey Wales) were former confederates."

    The costume reference that made me smile was that Serenity's ex-soldier ship captain/smuggler still wore his uniform pants.

    Kind of like another sci-fi captain/smuggler I remember fondly from my youth; that guy's ship could make the Kessel run in 12 parsecs, though--a bit faster than Serenity...

  119. You have a religious troll in your sig? by cfalcon · · Score: 1

    Seriously, a religious troll in your sig? That's great. To make it better, it's actually a "my God(s) is/are better than your God(s)" troll.

    Anyway, yea, I get upset about sound in space, because space doesn't have any fucking sound in it, because it's space.

    Where there's no sound.

    I watch very, very, little TV. Less than an hour per week this year and last, and only a little more before that. Firefly was one of a few exceptions to that, because it was so much better than than other shows that I actually wanted to watch it instead of doing other things. It wasn't perfect, but their clear willingness to try (silent space scenes among the elements) meant that it was worth my time.

    Changing that now would be both a sell out and a different take on things completely.

    My priorities are, of course, none of your business ;)

  120. Re:Unjustly canceled? by DavidTC · · Score: 1
    Perhaps I should have said:

    'alien' ass?

    As my point was, duh, there are no aliens in Firefly.

    --
    If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
  121. Re:Looks really, really cool... but... by Bob+Uhl · · Score: 1
    One of the many things I loved about Serenity was how completely un-PC it was. The heroes are ex-Confederates (as in the real West); the Union is oppressive (as in the real late 19th century); the Indians are savages (as in the real 19th century). It's completely not the party line on the War Between the States and the Wild West.

    Also, revolvers are just cool:-)

  122. Re: Browncoats == greycoats by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1


    > The frontier is much like the American West after the Civil War. The Alliance is powerful but remote authority. Some of the main characters were rebels and wore brown (thus brown coats) much like some western characters (ie, the Outlaw Josey Wales) were former confederates.

    Mal = Jesse James

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  123. Actually... by Scrameustache · · Score: 1


    Serenity in 156 days and counting...

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

    1. Re:Actually... by MerrieB · · Score: 1

      Actually, Joss posted in the Browncoats forum that there is a special 10 city preview May 5th at 10:00 pm. So those lucky people who managed to get tickets before they sold out don't have to wait until Sept 30th. http://browncoats.serenitymovie.com/serenity/index .html?fuseaction=forum.viewtopic&t=10362s.

  124. Details people, details! by Scrameustache · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Sadly I did not see any evidence of the classic look from FireFly specifically:
    the color scheme is very "cool" (color temprature... more blue), verses(sic) the much warmer scheme used in the series (more like the pallet from a western)


    The outer planets have a warm colour tone.
    The alliance planet have a cool, bluish hue: Rewatch "Ariel".

    Same applies to the trailer, pay attention when a Reaver ship is chasing Mal and Jayne, and a Reaver shoots a circular saw at Mal, the colour tones are those of the outer planets: Warm, yellowish.

    the series was famous for making special effect shots look like they were done with a hand-help camera: out of focus objects coming into focus, wild panning across the frame as if someone was trying to track with a moving object (rather than the perfect framing that is common), the point of view shaking with the "engine noise", etc..

    Check out the shot of Serenity zooming above a blue planet during Mal's intro speech near the beginning of the trailer: The camera vibrates, the ship moves out of frame and the camera tracks it shakily... exactly like what you lament not seeing in the trailer.

    many more close-ups of the actors. The series usually tried to keep groups in frame.

    2 things: First of all, he's showing us fanboys closeup shots of our beloved characters (look folks: The gang's all here!).
    Secondly, you have a very selective memory. Check out this site's excellent screenshot galleries to see that there were closeups of people all the time in the series. Why you erased that from your mind? I dunno.

    I hope that the preview is not representative of the final work we will see in September in this regard... I liked those aspects of the series.

    I hope the trailer is representative: I liked those aspects of the series and they're still there, if you look at what is actually shown in the trailer. Thank you.

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

  125. Anyone else notice earth that was? by mikenb · · Score: 1

    I've been looking through the trailer frame by fram e (Yes, I'm a browncoat. I can't wait until the movie comes out), and noticed that earth that was is a big part of it. There are at least 2 scenes where they're flying over it.

    --
    "Sometimes the most intelligent statement is the one that is left unsaid"
  126. You mean... by Akardam · · Score: 1

    When Mal kicks one of Niska's minions into one of Serenity's engines?

    God bless that man...

    1. Re:You mean... by pogle · · Score: 1

      That was the moment that hooked me on Firefly. I loved the Crazy Ivan move in the pilot, but I was still ambivalent about it until that point. But when Claw started threatening Mal, I looked at my friends and said "Eh, kill him."

      First time a TV show has listened to my advice. I was floored, and been an addict ever since :)

      --
      http://thechubbyferret.net - Ferret pictures and informative links.
  127. Why would Slashdotter's be interested? by mr.mighty · · Score: 1

    It's a sci-fi universe where even the whores can reject you. A Slashdotter's nightmare!

  128. firefly .torrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    bittorrent of the entire firefly series.

  129. Foreshadowing by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

    This Land where the dinosaurs live.

    I dunno about you, but when I watched "Ariel", I just HAD to yell out "Curse your sudden but inevitable betrayal!".
    I just had to : )

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

  130. Re:sound in space? oh well, itll be better than h2 by BlakeCaldwell · · Score: 1

    hahah, awesome post.

    a little tired, yes, but i didn't smell the sarcasm at all till the end there...

    very nice, and good point.. still, cmon, you gotta hate the hollywood bastardization process... no?

    not even a little?

  131. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  132. No sound in space in the movie by kieronb · · Score: 1

    People who've seen the rough cut in Sydney have commented (registration required) that the movie does not have sound in space. Also, the hand-held look and feel is there.

    Can't wait to see for myself.

  133. Re:Unjustly canceled? by McPierce · · Score: 1
    Family Guy is a hilarious show that combines raw humor with social commentary; I'd almost classify it as 'Simpsons for grown-ups', if it wasn't for the fact that everyone loves the Simpsons.
    IOW, it was a great show which got canceled, which is exactly what the OP implied Fox tends to do. I'll go further and throw out two more examples: Brimstone and Roar!, and how they ran The X-Files into the ground...
    --
    Darryl L. Pierce "What do you care what people think, Mr. Feynman?"
  134. Re:sound in space? oh well, itll be better than h2 by AussieVamp2 · · Score: 1

    zaphod suck so far by the looks, closer to Colin Farrell than Keith Richard and only 1 head!

  135. Re:sound in space? oh well, itll be better than h2 by BlakeCaldwell · · Score: 1

    ya, that's what i thought at first too, but they're _really_ far out there... i think most moviegoers wouldn't know what to think about a trailer w/o any space sound

    it's not a big deal, it was just cool to see a series try to show some respect for science :)

    although, maybe i should let it go -- this isn't apollo 13, it's a scifi flic.

    oh, hehe, please remember this thread, and let me know after you've seen H2G2 what ya thought. lemme know if you've read the books, cause that'll make a big difference in your opinion

    cheers

  136. Re:sound in space? oh well, itll be better than h2 by BlakeCaldwell · · Score: 1

    yup yup. though if i was producer, and my options were a stupid CG second head like in Star Wars 1 or 2, or just say "well, the second head is in his nose"... i'd probably go with the latter. at least we can get over it in the beginning of the movie, rather than be forced to think about how fake the second head looked...

    or they could just cast a two-headed actor... tho they're _really_ expensive, ya kno?

  137. Re:sound in space? oh well, itll be better than h2 by AussieVamp2 · · Score: 1

    stupid looking second head part of the point though?

  138. Re:Browncoats == greycoats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, slavery is mentioned in at least one episode. In the opening bar room brawl of "The Train Job" Capt. Mal gets into a bar fight with a slaver, although not over the issue of slavery. Later Inara, attempting to get Mal and Zoe out of prison, refers to him as her indentured property. For those missin' out on a little American history, indentured servitude provided the northern states with alot immigrants and decent portion of the work force. Indentured servitude was effectively abolished at the same time slavery was. While the differences between slavery and indentured servitude are radical, don't believe that the North held the higher moral ground because it didn't rob people of their personal rights. The North held the moral high ground because of its treatment of people whose personal freedoms it had robbed.

    IMHO, I think you gloss over the differences between slavery and indentured servatude far too much, to the deteriment of your point. To whit:

    Slaves, unless freed, were slaves for life, and usually any children were as well. Indentured servants had a pre-determined condition for the length of their servatude (usually explict time frames, although sometimes full payment of a debt). Also their children

    A person became a slave either by coercion or by birth. Indentured servants willfully entered into contracts with an employer.

    Slaves were treated as property (like farm animals), and hand few if any legal rights. Indentured servants still regarded as people, even though their employers had control over things like what work they did, where they lived, what they wore, and even what they ate (the last three the employer usually helped provide anyway). However, they still had the bulk of the legal rights and privileges they had before, and those they didn't enjoy were only temporarily suspended.

    The basic difference was that slavery reduced the slave to a non-person in a legal, social and even moral sense. That didn't happen to indentured servants. I'm sure there were employers that abused the privileges they had over indentured servants, but there were more protections and recourses available to abused indentured servants than to abuse slaves.

  139. Re:sound in space? oh well, itll be better than h2 by tricops · · Score: 1

    I don't know about them, but I saw H2G2 tonight and I was quite let down. Oh it had its funny moments... but they were just that, moments. The overall feel of the thing was just quite boring. I thought it was better than the original movie, but it just had so many dumb/"oh, ha.. ha.." moments... it didn't live up to my expectations, and I didn't even really have any major expectations. here's hoping serenity will come out better (though it can at least fall back on action rather than trying for a laugh the whole way through)...

    --
    (\(\
    (^v^)
    (")")
    This is the cute vorpal bunny virus, copy to your sig or runaway, runaway in fear!
  140. Re:sound in space? oh well, itll be better than h2 by BlakeCaldwell · · Score: 1

    thx for the review.. i can't decide whether it's worth the $9 to go see h2g2... it'll probably be on rental in a few weeks if it's that awful :)

  141. Serenity in High Definition by Refrag · · Score: 1

    Apple has now made a high definition Serenity trailer available (for download!) for use with Quicktime 7.

    The file is 108MB and it is in 1280x544 resolution.

    --
    I have a website. It's about Macs.
  142. what the crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    why is this crap trying to play in itunes?

  143. Re:Browncoats == greycoats by mink · · Score: 1

    Some people say a man is made out of mud
    well a poor man's made outta muscle and blood
    Muscle and blood and skin and bone
    and a mind that's weak
    but a back thats strong

    I was born one mornin' when the sun didn't shine
    Picked up a shovel and I walked to the mine
    I hauled Sixteen Tons of number 9 coal
    And the straw-boss said, "Well, bless my soul"

    You haul Sixteen Tons, whadaya get?
    Another older and deeper in debt
    Saint Peter don't you call me cause I can't go
    I owe my soul to the company store

    --
    Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.