Slashdot Mirror


Google to Map San Francisco in 3D

mtz206 writes "SiliconValleyWatcher reports that "Google plans to use trucks equipped with lasers and digital photographic equipment to create a realistic 3D online version of San Francisco, and eventually other major US cities. The move would trump Amazon's A9 service, which offers two-dimensional photos of buildings on US city streets.""

267 comments

  1. Wow by PlancksCnst · · Score: 1, Funny

    Worlds biggest scanner?

    1. Re:Wow by SysSupport · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      Redundant?

      Man, the mods are hitting the pipe early today.

    2. Re:Wow by PlancksCnst · · Score: 0

      This is why I have to post with a 0 instead of a 1. They like to do that.

  2. copyright... by markild · · Score: 0

    Will this be copyrighted then?

    --
    Scully: Should we arrest David Copperfield?
    Mulder: Yes we should, but not for this.
    1. Re:copyright... by Threni · · Score: 1

      > Will this be copyrighted then?

      Everything is copyrighted.

    2. Re:copyright... by WormholeFiend · · Score: 2, Insightful

      yea but you can take photographs of stuff that's outside without having to ask permission...

      I would think that this new google thing would be allowed, but then again, google is a for-profit endeavor, so...

    3. Re:copyright... by elrous0 · · Score: 1
      Everything is copyrighted.

      And, if it isn't, it's probably patented.

      And since I own the patent on "The process of making insightful comments in a ditigal forum," you owe me some money, mister!

      -Eric

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    4. Re:copyright... by MyLongNickName · · Score: 4, Funny

      And since I own the patent on "The process of making insightful comments in a ditigal forum,"

      I've scanned Slashdot. No one has any examples of prior art. You are in like Flyn!

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    5. Re:copyright... by MaynardJanKeymeulen · · Score: 1

      Actually, you can't. (at least here in Europe)

      You can't take a picture of a statue for example, because that would be an illegal reproduction of the statue. Same goed for buildings etc.
      You can take a picture of someone in front of a statue, if it is clear that the person in front is the subject of the picture, instead of the statue.

      --
      "The day Microsoft makes a product that doesn't suck is the day they make a vacuum cleaner."
    6. Re:copyright... by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1

      You don't have fair-use in Europe...

      So what happens if you *are* taking a photo of a copyrighted object in a public space? The police arrests you?

    7. Re:copyright... by smchris · · Score: 1

      Will this be copyrighted then?

      I suppose. But it would be really, really NICE if they donated a lower res version to FlightGear.org! Imagine the hours of happy flying.

    8. Re:copyright... by MaynardJanKeymeulen · · Score: 1

      Of course they don't. I'd surprise me if the average Joe Cop knows that this isn't permitted.
      However, you certainly can't use those pictures in your own publications, there have been lawsuits over this.

      --
      "The day Microsoft makes a product that doesn't suck is the day they make a vacuum cleaner."
    9. Re:copyright... by Jaruzel · · Score: 1

      Incidently, A friend of mine was stopped by police two days ago in London. He had just left work (a major global investment bank), and took advantage of the strong evening sunlight to take some photographs with his semi-pro camera of the buildings in and around the Square Mile (Londons 'Wall Street').

      After about 10 minutes a police officer ran up to him, and said he'd been monitored on the CCTV cameras, and that 'Under Section 44 of the Anti Terrorism Act' he'd now search my friend and take down all his details. He also demanded that all the photos be deleted.

      My friend was flabbergasted, but the copper was totally serious, and threatened to take him to the police station if he didn't co-operate.

      -Jar.

      --
      Together, We Can Make Slashdot Better. I Do NOT Mod ACs. - Check Me Out
  3. Well by xor.pt · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Well, maybe if they extended their service to the rest of the world, say Europe, i'de give a damn.

    1. Re:Well by scottme · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Give them a break. They have to start somewhere after all.

    2. Re:Well by markild · · Score: 1

      I heard about this guy walking every street in New York. Google doing the same (to the whole world that is) would be quite amusing :D

      I can't wait to see them do country sides here in Norway...

      --
      Scully: Should we arrest David Copperfield?
      Mulder: Yes we should, but not for this.
    3. Re:Well by ZorbaTHut · · Score: 1, Troll

      Oh yeah, that sounds real believable.

      "For our first attempt, we're going to scan both San Francisco *and* all of Europe."

      One step a time here.

      --
      Breaking Into the Industry - A development log about starting a game studio.
    4. Re:Well by Gaewyn+L+Knight · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Europe?!? They havn't even done one city in their own country yet and your bashing them already?

      I love the rest of the world and international types... but you gotta remember that every company thinks of their country and locale first... Then they move on to the rest of the world.

      Now if google ever comes out and says: "We arn't doing europe because we think they are poopoo" THEN you can complain and I will join in with you.

      --
      Telcos have alot of dark fibre in the States. Most people assume that's optical fibre...but it's actually moral fibre.
    5. Re:Well by xor.pt · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They did, they started the map in the US, ok. Then the satellite pictures, where(?), in the US, ok i mean they already had the map there, so why not(?). And now they start the 3d maps, of course in the US. My point is, when will they stop implementing new features and start expanding the ones they have to the rest of the world?

    6. Re:Well by Skater · · Score: 1

      Why do they have to expand to the rest of the world? They can serve only one city if they want.

    7. Re:Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Start your own compacy and do your own country. Bitching won't solve anything, action will.

    8. Re:Well by shplorb · · Score: 1

      Team Soho beat Google to it.

      Go into your local game shop and pick up a copy of The Getaway for PS2 for a 3D map of London. =]

    9. Re:Well by TGK · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Google is a US corporation, held by (wait for it) mostly US stockholders with most of its buisness interests and target market in the US.

      As a corporation it is legaly bound to do what is best for its shareholders. While rolling out Google 3d Europe might be warm fuzzies, it's not necessarily the most exploitable market. Moreover, if you're going to test out an infrastructure heavy technology, why not do it in your home city (San Fran for Google)

      This comes down to money. Google thinks this will make them more money than rolling out more features to Europe.... that's why.

      --
      Killfile(TGK)
      No trees were killed in the creation of this post. However, many electrons were inconvenienced.
    10. Re:Well by space_dude_27 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      To be fair to them, they have expanded the features that they have eg Google Maps (including low-res satelite images) was expanded to the UK and I dare say will be expanded to other countries in time.

      If you're desperate to know when they plan to support your country then why not ask them http://www.google.com/support/maps/bin/request.py/ ? You never know, they might be good enough to tell you... ;-)

    11. Re:Well by pootypeople · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Google is a company in the United States; as such, when rolling out a new service like this that requires trucks to go around a city, it is more feasible to do it in your own country, where you don't have to pay for the transportation of large equipment. Google does alot of things, but wasting money isn't one of them. They'll get their features ready for the rest of the world as quickly as they can, and not a second faster.

    12. Re:Well by PhoenixFlare · · Score: 0, Redundant

      They're a US-based and owned company, why shouldn't they concentrate on the US? Because you personally feel left out?

      If they were based in Europe and concentrating on that area while not doing much for the US...Would you still care?

    13. Re:Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "...when will they stop implementing new features and start expanding the ones they have to the rest of the world?"

      ...When the owners of the map data for the rest of the world sell it to them - map data isn't easy to get, and the people who own it tend to guard it very jealously.

    14. Re:Well by mbbac · · Score: 1

      Why is everyone on Slashdot so Euro-centric? There are other places on this strange planet, you know.

      --

      mbbac

    15. Re:Well by brontus3927 · · Score: 1
      My point is, when will they stop implementing new features and start expanding the ones they have to the rest of the world?

      Maybe when they move out of beta?

    16. Re:Well by Orinthe · · Score: 1

      I'd love Google Maps to have satellite photos of, say, Japan, and other countries too, but realistically, there is still a very large part of America that doesn't have satellite photos beyond an incredibly low resolution. Outside of major cities, you can often barely make out even major highways.

      --
      SELECT quote.text AS sig FROM quote NATURAL JOIN attribute WHERE attribute.description = 'witty';
      0 rows returned
    17. Re:Well by shmert · · Score: 1

      Plus, San Francisco is one of the more interesting cities, topographically speaking. All the hills make for a lot more 3-dimensional variation than, say, Copenhagen.

      --
      You drank my drink, you drunk!
    18. Re:Well by Dracolytch · · Score: 1

      Yes, because it makes sense to start an experimental project 1/2 way around the world where the economies make equipment more expensive, time zone issues make collaborating with home base more difficult, and staffing becomes an issue.

      It'd be far too impractical to use facilities, staff, and equipment located around your headquarters.

      ~D

      --
      This sig has been enciphered with a one-time pad. It could say almost anything.
    19. Re:Well by kitty+tape · · Score: 1

      Actually, the reason is probably even more simple. Where is Google? Mountain View, CA. What's near mountain view? San Francisco. Where can they get random employees to go in trucks? See above.

      --
      ----- "Type theory is like pretzels on crack." -- random friend
    20. Re:Well by lowrydr310 · · Score: 1
      Is it legal to drive around a truck equipped with a bunch of lasers and beam them all over a city?

      If we can't point our simple cheapo laser pointers at incoming planes, why is it OK for Google to drive around with a truckload of lasers (and most likely NOT your typical measly laser pointer). What if a plane is flying overhead while google is doing their laser mapping.

    21. Re:Well by IceAgeComing · · Score: 1


      Laser range finders are used in many robots, and the people working on them do not wear protective eyegear. I don't believe they are hazardous to eyes. For one thing, the laser is scanning extremely fast, a bit like a CRT gun, in order to get a 2D "map" of distance measurments.

    22. Re:Well by haute_sauce · · Score: 1

      Can we add that San Francisco is a very well known tourist destination ? What about the fact that it is in close proximity to Cal and Stanford (think interns, grad students, and thesis work), so new ideas and cheap labor is abundant. And did any one mention that it is close to silicon valley ? Not to dismiss Rome as a wonderful tourist spot, but it does not immediately come to mid when I think 'technological innovation'. But you are correct, instead of mapping a location in close proximity to the tech and the people, and easily accessible for 'ground truthing', they should have done this somewhere else...

    23. Re:Well by teksno · · Score: 2, Funny

      before they would even conceve a plan like this im sure that they spoke with the mayors office yo get what ever permits they needed.

      and now for your reading pleasure, the teksno players reinactment of the trip to the permit office:

      minimum wage clerk:"next...man i hate my f*#king job...

      Google:"yes hi, i was wondering if we could get a permit to drive around the city with a truck full of lasers and scan all the buildings. we're trying to make a 3d map of the city..."

      clerk: what the hell is this granolla nut talking about... ummm..what?

      google: id like to make a 3d map of the city...we have big trucks woth lasers that are going to kill ever...er....scan all the buildings so we can plan our take over of the world one city at a time...i mean ...wow did i just say that...what i meant to say is...ummm...yeah...look i doubt you have any permits for what i want to do so just give me one of everything...cause all i REALLY want to di is make a map of the city.

      clerk: you can but a map at the gas station on the cornner...

      Google: can i please just have all the permits you guys have...i want to do something so technologicaly advanced that no one in their right mind would even think about doing it...

      clerk: well ok, wheres your paper work?

      google:err...paper work...umm...yeah about that....look im from google...we didnt really know we needed paper work...

      clerk: oh Google....like gmail and stuff...thats so cool. here ya go....dont worry about any paper work...ill take care of it. by the way, can i have an invite to gmail...i hear its kinda exclusive

      google: ...yeah...its real exclusive....here sonce youve been so cool about the whole paper work thing, heres 10,000,000,000 invites...do what ever you want with em..

      clerk: WOW!!!thanks. im so cool.

    24. Re:Well by teksno · · Score: 1

      yeah ok i suck at spelling....im giving up.

  4. Re:ENOUGH with Google already! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i agree!

  5. Trucks? Pft by strongmace · · Score: 1, Funny

    What, Google couldn't find a way to use sharks running on linux?

    --
    "If we hit that bullseye, the rest of the dominos will fall like a house of cards. Checkmate." -Zapp Brannigan
  6. Re:Thank you, Slashdot! by shicklin · · Score: 1

    Midday for us on the other side of the pond. Great when you've just come back from lunch

  7. Terms of use by darealpat · · Score: 1

    This is probably the reason why Google shutdown the Google Wallpaper site mentoned previously.... taking care of competitors, but in a nice way.

    --
    For every present, there is a past
    1. Re:Terms of use by jbrocklin · · Score: 2, Insightful
      This is completely different from Google Wallpaper - this is overlaying visual map data over 3D scans of the same physical map locations. Google Wallpaper is...er...was "stitching" together images provided by Google Maps. Interesting in application, not all that difficult in implementation. Google's 3D service will be much more involved that simply stitching images together. Granted I'm thinking that there are several quick ways of doing it (OGL textures and whatnot) - but that's a lot of data to load over the web.

      And Google Wallpaper wasn't a competitor - they were using Google's servers, and their data (which they payed for) to provide a service which violated the terms of service of Google Maps - and had the possibility of becoming a business for the guy. Obviously Google would have had to take legal action against the guy if he started making money off of the google maps data & service.

  8. Game mods by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wohooow, google will make us frag people in 'real' cities...

    Counter Strike would be soooo much more fun :-D

  9. What is the practical application for this? by Packet+Pusher · · Score: 1, Troll

    I can't see how this would be useful for regular users but I could see how this could be used to plan attacks against our country. Is there something I'm missing?

    1. Re:What is the practical application for this? by Moth7 · · Score: 1

      So it'll help terrorists get their bearings, but it won't help innocent civilians. Right. What are you expecting, cyborg suicide bombers who can extract classified information from a map?

    2. Re:What is the practical application for this? by metlin · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yes, you are.

      It makes navigation a lot easier, settings of a city a lot familiar and an advancement in technology.

      I mean, you wouldn't expect us to still be playing 2d games, do you? We perceive things in 3d and can relate a lot more easily to real-world landmarks than abstract notions - a realistic 3d map of a city would mean that it is more life-like.

      At the very least, it is cool technology and it is progress.

    3. Re:What is the practical application for this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Duh!

      Playing a 1st person shooter!

    4. Re:What is the practical application for this? by Packet+Pusher · · Score: 1

      How exactly is it going to make navigation easier then GPS and a 2d overhead map. Quake Maps I can see, but navigation for normal people? Not buying it.

      It's a matter of doing it because they can imho, not because there is a good reason or use for it.

    5. Re:What is the practical application for this? by Moth7 · · Score: 1

      Some people's minds do abstraction better than others and from your post, I'd hazard a guess that you're one of them. However, being able to see what the street you are turning down should look like is a major help if you're not the kind of person who can instantaneously translate from a map to reality.

    6. Re:What is the practical application for this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Will someone suck all the air out of the USA please? I mean, in case it might be used by someone carrying out a terrorist attack.

    7. Re:What is the practical application for this? by lxt · · Score: 1

      I could easily see how a bog standard paper map could be used to plot attacks. Why don't we ban those?

    8. Re:What is the practical application for this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would be great to promote google, by using it in games...
      Would allso be great for GPS systems I suppose...

      933|: I'm gonna follow the trucks and make sure I am on allll their pictures!!!

    9. Re:What is the practical application for this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't hear anyone say it should be banned, just that it didn't add any value for non-attack-planning users.

      Does it?

    10. Re:What is the practical application for this? by csteinle · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Don't know about San Francisco, but it would certainly be useful here in Edinburgh. It's possible to get lost in 3 dimensions here. If you don't know the city you can easily be standing exactly where you want to be according to the map, but be looking up thinking "how the hell do I get up there?"

    11. Re:What is the practical application for this? by Shaper_pmp · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah, a sense of proportion.

      And a belt to strap down that jerking knee of yours.

      Jesus Christ on a crutch - why is it everything in the US now has to be defined in terms of its potential utility to terrorism? Other countries have been putting up with terrorism for years (often with the US's implicit or explicit approval) without reigning in basic human rights like privacy and freedom, but the second you have a large-scale foreign terrorist action on the US mainland suddenly the FBI can unilaterally read your mail and harsh language is banned in case it's used by Teh Terr0ri5ts!!!!

      Even after 9/11, you're still hundreds of thousands of times more likely to die in a car crash than from terrorist action. Why aren't you worrying about the implications of allowing anyone to buy a car without a background check, fingerprinting, surgically-embedded RFID tag and rectal swab on file?

      --
      Everything in moderation, including moderation itself
    12. Re:What is the practical application for this? by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

      There is a difference between the information you can get about a place from a map and the way it actually looks like when you're there.

      When you are driving or walking somewhere you do not look around you and see a 2D map or the same thing you see looking at a map, you have to look for road names, count the number of junctions you have gone past etc etc. If you could see actual images of the key direction changes on your route and of the place you are going to it would make things an awful lot easier.

      For example knowing that the building you are looking for is opposite a gigantic red brick flagpole is a lot easier than knowing it's midway between the 18th junction on the left 300M before the road forks.

    13. Re:What is the practical application for this? by orion41us · · Score: 1

      We perceive things in 3d and can relate a lot more easily to real-world landmarks than abstract notions - a realistic 3d map of a city would mean that it is more life-like.

      Yes, but then you will get lost in the virtual city just as easily as in the real one, one of the benefits of a maps it that it abstracts the physical place - so you can see the forest from behind the trees...

    14. Re:What is the practical application for this? by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

      Yes but you would be getting lost in the virtual city in the comfort of your living room with plenty of time to get your self unlost rather than doing it for real with heavy bags in a torrential downpour at 3 in the morning.

    15. Re:What is the practical application for this? by z0idberg · · Score: 1

      I didnt know George Dubya read slashdot!
      welcome George!
      When can we expect the entire Google staff to be dragged off to Guantanamo for this obviously anti-patriotic act?

    16. Re:What is the practical application for this? by milimetric · · Score: 1

      ok, so someone else answered this and they were wrong. How about an autonomous auto-pilot driver powered by Google 3D? Or an autonomous flying taxi. Have a little immagination people, don't just let Google have all the fun.

    17. Re:What is the practical application for this? by Mant · · Score: 1

      You can integrate it with a 2D map so you can go from one to another, make buildings invisible, or have it highlight routes. All of which would make it much easier to find your way.

    18. Re:What is the practical application for this? by TheStonepedo · · Score: 1

      I think there is a significant gain to be had in planning. In large suburban areas it is easy to get lost in a neighborhood of cookie-cutter homes that are merely variations on one design, often with decorative but impractical house numbering. "Turn left onto Soccermom St., #235 across the from the hideous, vomit-green vinyl-sided house with 3-car garage." rather than "Turn left onto Soccermom St., #235 across the street from the house with the roof of dimensions approximately 60x40 feet."

      --
      I'll be your candy shop of infinite deliciousity if you'll be my discotheque of endless rump-shaking.
  10. A strange sight by LaundroMat · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Let's just hope they'll warn the authorities and tell them of their good intentions, because I can imagine not everyone will consider the driving around in trucks 'equipped with lasers and photographic equipment' as a non-threatening activity.

    --
    "Those innocent fun games of the hallucination generation"
    1. Re:A strange sight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, once up a time in the Soviet Union you couldn't take photos of public property without consent of the authorities. And now I fear that the country that's all about freedom forbids exactly what the SU forbid a long time ago. How times changed.

    2. Re:A strange sight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah - this is a homeland security issue!! Right!! JEZUZ!

    3. Re:A strange sight by JUSTONEMORELATTE · · Score: 2, Informative

      Alternately, if you want to build a terror-truck equiped with lasers and such, just paint a colorful "Google" logo on the side and you'll be able to drive wherever you want.

    4. Re:A strange sight by drewzhrodague · · Score: 1

      I went for a walk with a friend through my neighborhood, the South Side of Pittsburgh. I was stopped by a security guard, who told me that I could not take pictures of the hospital buildings. He got real close and mean when I asked why, and only upon pressing him did he tell me it was a security risk. In my own fucking neighborhood.

      --
      Zhrodague.net - I do projects and stuff too.
    5. Re:A strange sight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey man, they're a corporation; they do have to play by the same rules that the sheeple do.

      Lets hope that the terrorists never figure this out and form their own corp.

    6. Re:A strange sight by michaelhood · · Score: 1

      As long as you're not on their private property, tell him to go to hell. If it becomes physical, sue the hospital and retire.

  11. GTA: Google? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So when does Grand Theft Auto: Google come out?

  12. Re:ENOUGH with Google already! by PlancksCnst · · Score: 0

    d00d! Google rocks! I want a /. that is all google. Oh, wait...

  13. Why? by onion2k · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What's the point? Ok, it'll be pretty to look at, but highly accurate maps are actually less useful in pretty much all applications than simplified thematic representations.

    1. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess you could use it to do reverse lookups: You're lost in SF so you snap a photo on your phone-camera (camera-phone?) and send it to google which returns which street you're on and how to go to get where you want :-)

      Seriously though, it's a good question.

    2. Re:Why? by AtlanticGiraffe · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Which makes business sense because it makes us interested in Google.

      When they score geek points, geeks want to work for them. That way, they get the best people for the lowest price.

      Geeks are also the have a major influence on other people's online behaviour. Did your mother try out all the other search engines before deciding that google was the best?

    3. Re:Why? by Tibe · · Score: 1

      This is after all how Google started.

      From Larry Page's speech to the 2005 graduating class of the University of Michigan College of Engineering...

      "We basically downloaded the whole web, and we weren't quite sure what we were going to do with it. It seemed like a good project at the time."

      Original Slashdot Story

    4. Re:Why? by VirtualLemming · · Score: 0

      Why? GTA4 !!!

    5. Re:Why? by blekkazzen · · Score: 2, Insightful

      For an example, most department stores have those little schematic of their stores that show where each area is in the store. Using that you can tell someone "Meet me in the sporting good section" and they can look at the map and figure out where the sporting good section is and meet you there. Problem is that you can't be anymore specific and instantly expect the person to know where you're talking about unless they've been there. Now on the other hand if you had a detailed 3D map of the store you could say meet me where the basketballs are and someone could look and see exactly where the basketballs are in relation to everything else and meet you there. Now depending on how detailed Google's 3D maps will be you could do the same exact thing. You could point out a specific landmark and the person could go to Google's map page and see exactly what you're talking about and where it's in relation to everything else and know exactly where to go. I don't know about you but I hate going somewhere and knowing that I'm in the right general area but having to guess if I'm in the right specific spot.

    6. Re:Why? by Analogy+Man · · Score: 2, Interesting
      The extra detail can be very useful. Consider this use case: Friday (tomorrow) I am driving from Michigan to Sheboygan Wisconsin, picking up my sister at the Airport in Milwaukee. There is a park on Lake Michigan a few minutes away from the airport I will use to entertain my kids in the event that I get through Chicago ruch hour traffic with time to spare.

      So with respect to the park, from the satellite image I was able to determine there is a beach, it is not apparent that access is controlled (i.e. state or county pass required at some sort of gate house), I can see which entrance serves the beach and picnic area and which is for the golf course, I have a visual idea of the lay of the land so I can drive right in like I have been there before.

      Sometimes you just have to marvel at how damn useful this stuff can be.

      --
      When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty.
    7. Re:Why? by HD+Webdev · · Score: 1

      What's the point? Ok, it'll be pretty to look at, but highly accurate maps are actually less useful in pretty much all applications than simplified thematic representations.

      Yes, but now we'll know where the better looking hookers are at before we travel to a new city.

      --
      This is not a dream, not a dream...we are transmitting from the year 1-9-9-9.
    8. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously Google Satelite Maps...

      WTF why do I need this. Maybe when I get my Popular Mechanics AirKar it might be handy.

      But when I'm so high as to be looking *down* on rooftops, I most certainly should not be driving.

      Useless waste of stockholder money.

    9. Re:Why? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      I want Google Maps' driving directions to offer me a photo at every road change.

      If you're driving on any sane road system this pretty much isn't necessary. But if you're driving in Massachusetts some of the intersections are pretty hairy and you have no idea what you're in for from the map. Some roads go up in the air, some go down and around, some you have to be in a certain lane to have any chance of taking, etc. The closer you get to Boston the more the insane meter starts to peg.

      Google can show me, from the perspective I'm going to be seeing it, what the intersection looks like and shade for me in red the path I'm going to be taking. I've got a pretty good visual memory, so when I get there I'll recognize it and know exactly where to shoot. This is immeasurably better than a map, almost like you've done it before.

      Then, Google can trawl the web for images with EXIF tags containing GPS coordinates, azimuth, and lens type (this is all starting to be available) and texture-map the photorealistic data onto their 3D model. Voila. Instant navigable 3D-world and only Google can do it.

      The only problem will be filtering out bogus jpeg's porn sites put up with fake EXIF data with ads for their hot mamas in them but some edge detection algorithms ought to be able to guess whether the image approximately fits the 3D model.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  14. Warning... by HaydnH · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... to anyone living in San Francisco: Make sure your curtains are drawn while doing things you shouldn't be doing.

    "Hey mom, check out this 3D Google version of our home, hey what are you and dad up to in your bedroom??? Ewwww!"

    --
    Time is an illusion. Lunchtime doubly so. - Douglas Adams
    1. Re:Warning... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, weird Slashdot error.

      "Slashdot requires you to wait 2 minutes between each successful posting of a comment to allow everyone a fair chance at posting a comment.

      It's been 3 minutes since you last successfully posted a comment

      Chances are, you're behind a firewall or proxy, or clicked the Back button to accidentally reuse a form. Please try again. If the problem persists, and all other options have been tried, contact the site administrator."

      Has anyone else experienced this?

    2. Re:Warning... by iceborer · · Score: 0

      "Hey mom...what are you and dad up to in your bedroom??? Ewwww!"

      I think you misspelled "dad" as "mom".

    3. Re:Warning... by broothal · · Score: 1

      This reminds me of a funny story. It was one of those cop shows in tv where a reporter was at the scene where a crime had taken place a few weeks ago.

      The reporter was giving the viewers a brush up of what happened when the cameraman caught something behind her. A couple was doing it and had forgotten to draw their curtains. The cameraman zoomed into the couple and filmed their act.

      Of course, they re-shot the scene later when the couple was done. However, the clip leaked to the internet, and within hours it had spread across the country.

    4. Re:Warning... by Alan · · Score: 1

      I don't believe you, please post link to video to regain the trust of the slashdot community. :)

    5. Re:Warning... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I thought it was weird that it said I had to wait 2 minutes and that 2 minutes had passed but I still couldn't post.

    6. Re:Warning... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      3 'jokes' about both parents being the same gender. Are they're really that many 13 year olds on slashdot?

    7. Re:Warning... by HaydnH · · Score: 1

      Perhaps they're all standing up for gay rights online... perhaps /. needs a new section ;P

      --
      Time is an illusion. Lunchtime doubly so. - Douglas Adams
  15. Imagine.. by myspys · · Score: 2, Insightful

    .. that data being used in games like GTA.

    You could visit every city they have mapped.

    Yummy!

    1. Re:Imagine.. by markild · · Score: 4, Funny

      Could get troublesome though...

      "I rememeber i robbed this bank once.. Wait, was that real life or GTA."

      --
      Scully: Should we arrest David Copperfield?
      Mulder: Yes we should, but not for this.
    2. Re:Imagine.. by AtlanticGiraffe · · Score: 1

      I was gonna say Doom 2. Damn, I'm old.

    3. Re:Imagine.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      A couple of my colleagues drove to a conference in Miami a few weeks ago. The driver for the last stretch realized partway through the city that he knew where he was, and where he was going (despite having never been to Miami before).

      After a few minutes, he realized that Vice City was actually modeled on Miami. He could point to buildings and say "There should be a strip club there!" and "I kicked the shit out of some gangsters over there!"

    4. Re:Imagine.. by Ligur · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I had a similar experience during my first-time visit to Paris, I later realized it must have been due to having played Midtown Madness 3 where one of the locales is the city of Paris, not very accurately modeled mind you, though the roads along the Seine were fairly accurately depicted in the game.
      Also, I found myself recognizing my surroundings in Dublin, Ireland. as soon as I saw the "spike" I realized where from: Remember that slashdot article from about a year ago where you could control a set of skylights over Dublin using a 3D-model of the area where the lights were set up?
      Well, my point being: I can't recall ever recognizing my surroundings from 2D-maps. It seems 3D representations are easier to learn and remember. And so, there *is* a point to what google is doing.

      --
      Smoke me a kipper, I'll be back for breakfast.
    5. Re:Imagine.. by suitepotato · · Score: 1

      Worse yet, The Sims.

      "Dad, why are all these guys wearing leather on Castro Street?"

      "Er..."

      --
      If my grammar and spelling are off, I am [distracted/tired/careless] (take your pick)
    6. Re:Imagine.. by Infinityis · · Score: 1

      Actually, I think I'd prefer to have this kind of data for the DARPA Grand Challenge "game"...if they did 3-D mappings of all the possible routes, then that'd make for a pretty easy race...

  16. In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...Google plans to use sharks with frickin' LASERS on their heads to map the Atlantic seabed.

  17. One Upmanship by CastrTroy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Seems like there's a lot of one upmanship going on in the mapping business. Everybody seems to be trying to outgimmick everyone else. My favourite is still Mapquest. Although they could learn a little about UI from Google, I find that MapQuest's maps provide much more information as far as street names, especially when zoomed out. I also don't really like the look of google's oversided roads.

    --

    Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    1. Re:One Upmanship by strongmace · · Score: 0

      One Upmanship helps us all. It drives companies to try to create better services and products. Although sometimes it may seem that the services or products have no practical purpose, many great things have been developed out of situations like this.

      --
      "If we hit that bullseye, the rest of the dominos will fall like a house of cards. Checkmate." -Zapp Brannigan
    2. Re:One Upmanship by Morgahastu · · Score: 1

      Mapquest is useless in Canada. It can't find many addresses I give it. Google maps has never stumbled on any address I give it.

    3. Re:One Upmanship by birder · · Score: 1

      I use www.map24.com. A lot more up to date than Google for Canada.

    4. Re:One Upmanship by The_Wilschon · · Score: 1

      Mapquest is terrible here (Chicago west suburbs). Several times I've tried to get directions places (Since I don't live here, I'm only working in the summer), and mapquest takes me to the middle of a residential neighborhood when I'm trying to go to, for example, a mall. Or it tells me to turn right where there is no place to turn right (or left) etc. So during the summers at least, I've given up on Mapquest. Of course, when I get back home to Texas, its a different story. But then again, at home, I don't generally need Mapquest...

      --
      SIGSEGV caught, terminating

      wait... not that kind of sig.
    5. Re:One Upmanship by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      Mapquest had a problem for a while where the front page search would only yield results in US. Canadian address work now, but didn't for a long time, even though they should have. You had to go to maps, and specify the country for it to work. It seems that its been able to find any address I've given it.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    6. Re:One Upmanship by jaeson · · Score: 1

      I also don't really like the look of google's oversided roads.

      Yeah those roads with like six or seven sides are really awful to navigate.

    7. Re:One Upmanship by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bump for useful...

  18. That depends on the user by Moth7 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    People respond differently to different stimuli. While you might be able to pick out the street corner you agreed to meet on from looking at a couple of lines on some paper, others (myself included) would find it beneficial to see an actual 3D visualisation of what the place looked like so that they know what and where they're aiming at.

  19. ground truthing civic data? by danharan · · Score: 1

    Since mapping data can be so damned expensive, I wondered if it would be possible to use digital photographs to read civic numbers and/or street names. Assuming you could read traffic signs, the same photos may be used to gather data about driving constraints (one-way streets, stops, left/right-only turns, etc.)

    That could effectively break the monopoly of the big mapmakers for those things we like to hack.

    Anyone know?

    --
    Information: "I want to be anthropomorphized"
    1. Re:ground truthing civic data? by seweso · · Score: 0

      And while your at it: opensource it, i mean create a gps-foto device and generate up-to-date on the fly.

    2. Re:ground truthing civic data? by UMhydrogen · · Score: 1

      Despite all the advances in computing it is still VERY hard to take a photo and program a computer to find a sign or civic number and be able to read it. Although I'm sure google has the brains to do it, I just don't know how accurate it would be. Prob. easier to just drive around in a certain programmed path that knows the route. Not worth spending all the time and money (in people's salaries) to program some Image Processing algorithm to read it.

    3. Re:ground truthing civic data? by hazee · · Score: 1

      By rights mapping ought to be the ultimate community application - it's inherently distributed by nature.

      If everyone was to map out their local area by means of GPS and some simple software, then all the small patches could be combined into a street level map of the whole world. Or at least, the part of it populated by people with GPS receivers.

      I guess that's the problem at the moment. Hopefully, once they start embedding GPS receivers in every cell phone, this sort of application will really take off.

      Think of it as a sort of mapping equivalent of Wikipedia. It may not be perfect, but it would be far more comprehensive and up to date than any commercial effort could ever be.

    4. Re:ground truthing civic data? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      but if you cram all that into a civic, where will you find room for the oversized tailpipe and spoiler? *maybe misunderstood the topic*

  20. Why? by edwilli · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Seems to me Google does some things simply for intellectual curiosity, then ends up figuring out a way to make money off it.

  21. What Next? by sendorm · · Score: 1

    Putting online versions of people in to this 3D city remappings? Wow, somebody find me a Neo.

    1. Re:What Next? by z0idberg · · Score: 1

      forget about Neo, finally we might be able to track down the real life Wally...or the woman in the red dress :-P

  22. Google to take over the world! by el_womble · · Score: 4, Funny

    Step 1: Strap frickin' laser beams to sharks head
    Step 2: Map the ocean
    Step 3: ????
    Step 4: PROFIT!!!

    --
    Scared of flying, pointy things snce 1979!
    1. Re:Google to take over the world! by Stoopid-Guy0 · · Score: 0

      You should get a patent on your technique for strapping "laser beams" to sharks' heads. You could be rich !

  23. There is already a virtual London project at UCL by charlie_vernacular · · Score: 5, Informative

    At the risk of sounding like an advert (and apologies to those who feel that I do), the Centre for Advanced Spatial Analysis (CASA) at University College London is building a 3D GIS-based model of London that will and can be used to help the public explore different urban planning outcomes (amongst other things).

    About Virtual London here:

    http://www.casa.ucl.ac.uk/research/virtuallondon.h tm

    About CASA's research here:

    http://www.casa.ucl.ac.uk/research/index.htm

    Declaration of Interest: Professor Mike Batty, who runs CASA, was one of my PhD supervisors.

  24. Not just the USA by Mr_Silver · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I know that I'm in the minority here, but it would be nice that, instead of rolling out newer and cooler projects to America only, Google remembered that they have an equally large (if not larger?) user base in Europe who also made a significant contribution to their success.

    Yes, we did (eventually) get Froogle here in the UK, but I don't believe any of the other countries have. Google maps also arrived, but again, I don't believe it covers anywhere else.

    Now you have satellite imagery and 3D maps and again the UK hope for it and the rest of Europe seems to be out on a limb.

    I have no doubt that the UK will eventually see this stuff (as with the others) and for that I am thankful - however our friends elsewhere in Euroland I fear will never see the light of day of some of this rather cool products.

    --
    Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
    1. Re:Not just the USA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are working on getting every product to other countries. They are hiring people in the other countries to start these products in there area.

    2. Re:Not just the USA by natrius · · Score: 1

      Google is a business. They expand services when it makes economic sense.

    3. Re:Not just the USA by slapout · · Score: 1

      Look at it this way: The US is being used for beta testing. So while we get the cool stuff first, we also get all the bugs that you won't have to worry with.

      --
      Coder's Stone: The programming language quick ref for iPad
    4. Re:Not just the USA by isotpist · · Score: 1

      They are an american company, so they start in the USA. Maybe someone should look at this as an opportunity to better serve the European customers.

    5. Re:Not just the USA by SEGV · · Score: 1

      My city, the largest between Toronto, Ottawa, and Montreal, still doesn't have a detailed satellite map on the regular online map systems. I won't hold my breath for a 3D rendering.

      --

      --
      Marc A. Lepage
      Software Developer
    6. Re:Not just the USA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess that's flamebait since I misspelled "google", eh?

    7. Re:Not just the USA by TwP · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Tell you what. Give me a call on your 3G cellphone and whine to me in person while sending me 2 Mpixel photos of your crappy Google interface. Or you can write me an e-mail while your zipping along at 180Kph in your bullet train with wireless capabilities. Or you can drive your fuel efficient smart car over the Atlantic ... never mind. Not all technologies make it across the pond. Sorry. That's the way it is. I'm sure if you want to give a few million dollars to Google to get these services in Europe they would be willing to listen. In fact, I'm sure they have even scoped out the business case and revenue model for brining these services to Europe. In the meantime enjoy your government health care, your month of holiday, and your labor party government ;) When the Google commandos hit the beaches to save the UK and Europe from the evils of "we-don't-have-nice-maps" we'll let you know.

    8. Re:Not just the USA by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1
      Well - two years ago I started dealing in international business. You simply would not believe the size of the market in the USA. It is a businessman's dream. I mean, everyone goes on about it, but once it starts making a difference in your life, you really come to realize just what a titan it is. Europe is nice, but don't jump the gun.

      Or, here's an idea, why doesn't Europe start its own Google, then you can have everything you want and exclude the Americans. Oh...right...it's impossible to start new businesses in Europe. (Another thing you learn quickly in int'l business - I'm from a small U.S. startup, and not a SINGLE one of my European buddies are from small companies, they're all from huge conglomerates.)

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    9. Re:Not just the USA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, there is an european directive that requires EU members to have a publicly available map of the noise by 2007.

      In Paris, there are working on a 3D map that will show all the buildings colored by noise pollution. I saw a demo in a TV show and the resolution is impressive as the buildings in the demo had the surface painted in several shades of colors, i.e. some part of the building were more exposed to noise pollution than others.

      I don't know if the demo is accessible from the web, but news.google.fr have several news articles about that (in French).

    10. Re:Not just the USA by SnprBoB86 · · Score: 1

      LOL

      Well put. I don't know if that is more insightful or funny...

      Well, clearly the /. thinks its Insightful :-P

      --
      http://brandonbloom.name
    11. Re:Not just the USA by pipingguy · · Score: 1


      I guess the Smart Car is not available in America.

    12. Re:Not just the USA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's no surprise that Google is slow to roll out in Europe. The French government hates Google, and the German government hates globalism, and... what other countries do you have over there again?

    13. Re:Not just the USA by csteinle · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'm loving my "Labour" party government that only 23% of the population and 37% of those who voted actually voted for. And Democrats in the US think they've been disenfranchised...

      Not that the Tories would have been any better, mind you. It would just be nice to have a government that didn't ride roughshod over the opinions of the 63% of voters who don't agree with them.

  25. I knew it... by derkyjadex · · Score: 5, Funny

    "...trucks equipped with lasers...", Google have finally begun their attack on the world...

    --
    Lift out of order. Bubble sort in progress.
    1. Re:I knew it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good thing they didn't say anything about the sharks.

  26. Lasers on trucks are "old hat"... by pandrijeczko · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...just nuke the site from orbit.

    --
    Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
    1. Re:Lasers on trucks are "old hat"... by aug24 · · Score: 1

      I agree. It's the only way to be sure.

      J.

      --
      You're only jealous cos the little penguins are talking to me.
  27. Here's what I would like to see one day by ChrisF79 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Ever map out where you're going, only to find that its nearly impossible to see any address numbers on buildings, making it harder than it should be to find your destination? I'd like to see streaming video that shows you the drive to wherever you're going. Of course, you could speed it up for the long parts, but show the turns so you know what to look out for. It seems like they could equip some delivery trucks (from other companies) with cameras, maybe strike a deal with UPS or Fedex, and then sort out the video later. Of course, it would take a lot of work, but it could start with smaller cities and work its way up. Now that's what I'd like to see...

    --
    Finance tutorials and more! Understandfinance
    1. Re:Here's what I would like to see one day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes! I doubt you even need to have a video to do it - just print out pictures of the major turns you will make along with the directions. That would be a Huge step forward in navigation sites.

      When we give people directions from one person to another we say things like "take the left after the (various landmarks here)" - now you can just look at a picture to see where to turn!

    2. Re:Here's what I would like to see one day by ChrisF79 · · Score: 1

      Funny you would mention the landmarks. I used to drive from Florida to Maryland quite a bit, and once I was in Maryland, I'd take the back roads all the way to my destination. Anyhow, there was a giant weeping willow tree where I needed to turn and it was right near the road so you couldn't miss it. I had no idea what the name of the road was, and never paid attention to anything else because I could always count on the tree... until they chopped it down. To make a long story short, I added a good 2 hours onto my last trip due to the absense of that tree!

      --
      Finance tutorials and more! Understandfinance
    3. Re:Here's what I would like to see one day by Buzz_Litebeer · · Score: 1

      On a related note, the first Rand McNalley books were actually done this way. they would take a camera with them and document intersections where you would have to turn to get to major intersections. Your idea would simply move that first road mapping idea to the modern era.

      --
      If you don't vote, you don't matter, so don't waste your time telling me your opinion
    4. Re:Here's what I would like to see one day by bug506 · · Score: 1

      This is a cool idea... one problem will be how often the information is updated.

      The regular maps get outdated, but they can be fixed relatively quickly. Pictures of a place--whether 3D, 2D or satellite--would take longer to update.

      For an example of this, look at Highway 87 in San Jose, which was recently upgraded to a freeway for its whole length. The regular map view shows the freeway as it is today, passing over a road (Hedding) with no direct access to 87. When you switch to the satellite view, though, you see the old intersection. The satellite view has not kept up with the map.

      I imagine it might be more problematic for the surface level 3D view because instead of just dealing with changing roads, you might pick a landmark that no longer exists--the little corner market that you were going to turn at is suddenly a Wal-Mart.

      It's not an inherent problem with the idea--there is nothing stopping Google from keeping their images up-to-date, and a reasonable user would know that they might get thrown for a loop and to not rely entirely on the video (just as people now know not to rely entirely on the map view since they can also be outdated--such as the 87/101 interchange which had some significant changes that aren't yet reflected.)

      And, of course, it would be cool just to see the video. :)

    5. Re:Here's what I would like to see one day by Spy+Hunter · · Score: 1

      What A9 has is almost that, have you tried it? For major roads, you can walk up and down the street viewing pictures of each side of the road. Great for locating landmarks and/or finding out exactly where that store is so you don't miss it driving past.

      --
      main(c,r){for(r=32;r;) printf(++c>31?c=!r--,"\n":c<r?" ":~c&r?" `":" #");}
  28. US cities? by __aahlyu4518 · · Score: 1

    Why only US cities? Sure there are some interesting cities in the US. But how about Paris, Rome, Rotterdam, Tokyo etc etc ?

    1. Re:US cities? by MyLongNickName · · Score: 1

      Not Paris. The French would complain that Google is eating into their tourism profits and expel them from the country.

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    2. Re:US cities? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Duh, Paris, Rome etc are not in the US you numbskull ! They are in that place known as the rest of the world.

    3. Re:US cities? by MaynardJanKeymeulen · · Score: 1

      Rotterdam?
      There's squat to see in Rotterdam.
      If you'd make a model from a city in Holland, I'd go for Amsterdam at least.

      --
      "The day Microsoft makes a product that doesn't suck is the day they make a vacuum cleaner."
    4. Re:US cities? by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

      Why not read the article, smarty? It's only about 3.5 paragraphs, including this particular gem:

      "The goal is to create similar 3D online versions of other cities in the US and overseas."

  29. ... Profit by Savage-Rabbit · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I love the rest of the world and international types... but you gotta remember that every company thinks of their country and locale first.

    Don't credit corporations with having deep rooted feelings of patriotism, you will be disappointed if you do. Every company (that is not being mismanaged) thinks about the most profitable market first so that it can bring the only people it truly cares about, the shareholders, managers and key employees, a good profit/reward. Google is launching this service in the US because they did their math and concluded it's the biggest and most profitable market.

    --
    Only to idiots, are orders laws.
    -- Henning von Tresckow
    1. Re:... Profit by hhawk · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Profit Yes, but given the many HILLS and Valleys that make up SF, it might also be a great test case for what ever technology they are using.

      Some would consider this good risk management; start w/ some very hard cases and see if you can handle it.

      --
      http://www.hawknest.com/
    2. Re:... Profit by Gaewyn+L+Knight · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree with you in the long term... however... every company at least looks at their locale first since they know that management and setup fees are usually cheaper for projects closer to home.

      They may not stay there... but they always look there first.

      In this case google saw a large city not too far away and most likely said 'Hey... this will be a cheap guinea pig that won't require much hassle... let's start here'

      I have yet to see a business from say Michigan say... "Hey! We are starting out a new idea... let's try it in London first instead of Detroit!"

      --
      Telcos have alot of dark fibre in the States. Most people assume that's optical fibre...but it's actually moral fibre.
    3. Re:... Profit by Skim123 · · Score: 1

      Not only does the topology of San Fancisco make it a good test, but it's also spatially close. I mean, there are plenty of other locales with the same or more exaggerated topology, but they may be much further away from Google's headquarters. Because of this spatial locality I would be surprised if their "first run" was anywhere but Frisco.

      --

      I could not justify my existence if I were a turkey farmer. Would I terminate myself? Undoubtably, yes.

  30. Re:ENOUGH with Google already! by flatface · · Score: 1

    Who cares? This would still be a /. appropriate story even if it wasn't being done by Google, but some other company. And no, you can't just ignore the article, can you? You have to reply to it, which also brings up the post count. If the Google articles didn't get many comments, do you think they'd still be posted?

  31. Colossal waste of money? by ruckerz2k · · Score: 2, Informative

    Big question, why? They could instead improve the accuracy of their google maps, which puts my house nearly a block and a half away of where it should be. Then again, we pay USGS to map out GPS maps... but I can't see the point in mapping out 3D maps.

    1. Re:Colossal waste of money? by AtlanticGiraffe · · Score: 1

      To score geek points. They need them.

    2. Re:Colossal waste of money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The reason it puts your house a block away from where it is is that the function that geocodes (places a text address to an actual location) only can use the data it has. In this case it is geocoding off of a streets database where the only information that it can use is this street segment starts at 1100 and ends at 1200 so if you are at 1120, the best it can do is to go 20% of the way between 1100 and 1200. Houses are very rarely that evenly spaced, so no roads based geocoder (mapquest,google,yahoo maps etc) will ever map your house at the exact location.

    3. Re:Colossal waste of money? by dextroz · · Score: 1

      Most people outside Google can't see the point in anything that it does until it's too late ;-) so you're excused. Otherwise their stock market would have tripled again!

      --
      Where's my free iPod!? Until then, I'll settle for a kiss...
  32. woa... fricking lasers on ... em... trucks.. by selderrr · · Score: 1

    do not look at truck with remaining eye !

  33. Solution to Google irritation by Bemmu · · Score: 1

    Always Google this and Google that! Release your anger with this therapeutical game:

    http://www.bemmu.com/google

    1. Re:Solution to Google irritation by Thijs+van+As · · Score: 1

      My score: fantastic

  34. This remind me of The Matrix by ID000001 · · Score: 1

    If someone can effectively turn the real world into a giant model. Something like Matrix will eventually happens! I for one know many people are literally waiting for a 3D world like this to 'play' inside. When visual reality catches on, would this be the killer app?

    1. Re:This remind me of The Matrix by QMO · · Score: 1

      Wasn't there a way cool Red Dwarf episode about living in virtual reality?

      (Aren't all Red Dwarf episodes way cool?)

      --
      Exam 4/C again. Maybe I'll do better this time.
    2. Re:This remind me of The Matrix by BadHedgehog · · Score: 1

      *> Wasn't there a way cool Red Dwarf episode about living in virtual reality? Yeppers, it was called Better Than Life. *> Aren't all Red Dwarf episodes way cool? I can't quite agree, truely spiffing maybe. Nick

    3. Re:This remind me of The Matrix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you mean to say "visual reality", or was that a typo? I think visual reality has already caught on big with large portions of the population...

  35. Extra dimensions equals faster invalidity by subStance · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I thought 2D maps had troubles with things changing and the map being incorrect. Can you imagine this ? If someone even digs up the sidewalk, the thing will become invalid.

    I know there are acceptable degrees of invalidity for mapping, but wouldn't adding an extra dimension to the map make it invalid even more quickly ? The applications for which one uses 3D maps are likely to require a lower error tolerance, aren't they ?

    (Someone correct me if I'm wrong - I'm no 3D modelling guru or map expert)

    --
    Servlet v2.4 container in a single 161KB jar file ? Try Winstone
    1. Re:Extra dimensions equals faster invalidity by ID000001 · · Score: 1

      No, because the map are a tool to help you find out where you are and how to get somewhere. Not a tool to let you know how it look like before you get there.
      It will not be a prefect model of 3D, but the exact depth of the road and the exact shape of a building should not make much of a different in term of making it a map.
      Obviously Google want it to be as accurate as possible. We can only see how well they can do by glue up a lot of technologies together to find new use for them.

  36. 3d maps and google by chrisranjana.com · · Score: 0

    IT is this ability to do new things that makes google so great !

    --
    Chris ,
    Php Programmers.
  37. Ad? Don't worry about it by JPelorat · · Score: 1

    Especially not in yet another SlashverGoogletisement article!

    --
    Hokey statistics and ancient misconceptions are no match for a good thought in your head, kid!
  38. Already done by bender647 · · Score: 1

    There are 3d simulations of San Francisco and London already.

    1. Re:Already done by cloudmaster · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Funny - I just sent an email out to some cow orkers that said just that...

  39. I Have A Plan...... by SaleNowOn · · Score: 5, Funny

    1) Find details of the trucks route and the dates that Google will be mapping San Francisco.

    2) Download pictures of the FBIs 50 most wanted and photoshop bodies on to them.

    3) Get the local print shop to create life size cardboard cutouts.

    4) Place cuts outs strategically around San Francisco. I like the thought of Osma coming out of McDonalds with a bigmac.

    1. Re:I Have A Plan...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Evil Bert _can_ return!

    2. Re:I Have A Plan...... by hairykrishna · · Score: 0

      Wow. You HAVE to do this.

      --
      "Physics is to math as sex is to masturbation." -R. Feynman
    3. Re:I Have A Plan...... by Nurgled · · Score: 1

      I can't help but wonder what would happen if someone were to run alongside one of these trucks in line with the sensors and just leap around. Would they then end up with just a big, smeared, stretched out person rather than the city?

    4. Re:I Have A Plan...... by dlelash · · Score: 1

      Even better, get hundreds of people to wear Osama masks that day. Have bail money ready, just in case.

  40. I for one... by Silicon+Jedi · · Score: 1

    welcome our laser-spy truck overlords.

  41. Patent your house brick arrangement by John+Seminal · · Score: 0
    I don't know about the rest of you, but how about a little privacy?

    There will be a great deal of abuse here. Imagine some girl gives out her phone number, or some guy finds it in a phone book. They find the address, they map it out. They even know what bushes to hide behind. Neat, tech helping pervs.

    I can see the mafia use this technology too. What to kill someone? How about a little research first. Lets see what roads lead to his house and away.

    Hmmm... and an idea for myself. By studying these maps, I bet it would not be too hard to find a vulnerable bank to hit. Have some cohorts fake a car accident on main street, that blocks off the police station from the road that leads to the bank. Lets see.... 1022 S. Lake street is a wide building with a lot next to it, no houses. We can leave a car there to switch to. It is only 3 blocks away.

    The only good thing is this won't be used by people who want to change the world. I can't see the Rodney King mob looking up their way to Beverly Hills on a laptop.

    But still, what good is this. Is it a publicity move? Is it dangerous?

    --

    Rosco: "If brains were gunpowder, Enos couldn't blow his nose."

    1. Re:Patent your house brick arrangement by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

      If you are intending on planning a bank robbery without ever actually going to have a look at your intended target, or employing trusted agents to do it for you I am definitely not joining your criminal gang.

    2. Re:Patent your house brick arrangement by Shaper_pmp · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "I don't know about the rest of you, but how about a little privacy?"

      What, you consider un-personally-attributable images merely of your building to be a privacy violation?

      Dude, I hate to break it to you, but your privacy is being violated hundreds of times a day - they're called passers-by. You might want to spend some time on the corner of your lot with paper head-bags and a persuasive smile.

      "There will be a great deal of abuse here. Imagine some girl gives out her phone number, or some guy finds it in a phone book."

      Ignoring the sheer difficulty of doing reverse-lookups from phone number to address (which is made intentionally hard, for this very reason)...

      "They find the address, they map it out. They even know what bushes to hide behind. Neat, tech helping pervs."

      Right, and they can't do this with... oh, I dunno... a paper map? Or by, you know, walking past the house once or twice?

      "I can see the mafia use this technology too. What to kill someone? How about a little research first. Lets see what roads lead to his house and away."

      Right, 'cause the Mafia are always bumping off people left, right and centre round where I live. How about you?

      And face it, any hitman or criminal who plans his crimes without first thoroughly casing the joint in real life first is a fucking retard.

      And someone that fucking stupid is going to be caught pretty soon anyway when they realise sniper rifles don't flush.

      You know, it's just occurred that you might be trolling - congrats if so, I utterly fell for it.

      You were trolling, right?

      --
      Everything in moderation, including moderation itself
    3. Re:Patent your house brick arrangement by xappax · · Score: 1

      I can see the mafia use this technology too. What to kill someone? How about a little research first. Lets see what roads lead to his house and away.

      By studying these maps, I bet it would not be too hard to find a vulnerable bank to hit.

      This is known as "casing the joint", and is a technology that has been accessible to "bad guys" for centuries. It has also incorporated any available technology that was available for information gathering at the time.

      Invented telescopes? Well, pretty soon we've got scurvy pirates scoping out helpless little seaside villages for plunder.

      Oh, "cameras", you say? Well, now we've got hard-boiled private investigators taking tele-photo pictures of stuff that's none of their business.

      So, my first point is that information gathering technology can always be used for nefarious purposes.

      My second point is that Google is only mapping public space. You can't pull up the Google3D map of the underground tunnels leading to the Oval Office. Any place on a Google 3D map is gonna be something viewable from a public street.

      So, lets say Google buys in to the terrorist hysteria and blocks out maps of every terrorist target (which, according to Fox news, is bloody everything). Now all I've got to do is stroll down the street and take a look at my target myself.

      And really - if you're gonna knock over a bank, what are you going to trust, some random Beta map system, or your totally inconspicuous dry-run from the actual location?

      A lot of Americans want our public information to be accessible, but somehow surounded by some magic "bad guy" filtering firewall. It can't be done, guys.

      Well, it can be done, but only by reading minds, which for our purposes means constant monitoring and documentation of your activities. Do we want that? I hope not.

    4. Re:Patent your house brick arrangement by th1nk · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ignoring the sheer difficulty of doing reverse-lookups from phone number to address (which is made intentionally hard, for this very reason)...

      Sheer difficulty? If you type a listed land-line number into Google, it will display the name and address associated with that number.

    5. Re:Patent your house brick arrangement by Alystair · · Score: 1

      Just curious and all, and it's slightly unrelated.. But what do you mean by "sniper rifles don't flush.", cheers.

    6. Re:Patent your house brick arrangement by Shaper_pmp · · Score: 1

      Not unless you (or someone else) has a web page which explicitely links the two. I don't know about you, but my home phone number isn't listed on any websites, and certainly not next to my name or address.

      And if you've willingly and voluntarily linked the two, in a publicly-searchable resource like the web, what are you complaining about privacy for? In addition, if someone else has put up a page with your personal information on it without your premission, I think this is a pretty clear violation of various Data Protection laws, so you could probably (and probably quite successfully) sue.

      Besides, this whole point it moot - the GGP was complaining about people being able to see a picture of his house on-line, not people being able to link phone numbers to addresses - that was pretty irrelevant to his complaint.

      --
      Everything in moderation, including moderation itself
    7. Re:Patent your house brick arrangement by Shaper_pmp · · Score: 1

      I just meant that someone stupid enough to think that casing a joint by looking at a picture of the front of the building on a web page was good enough preparation for an assassination was probably stupid enough to try to flush the sniper rifle afterwards to hide the evidence.

      Ie, if they're that impossibly stupid then I severely doubt they'd be able to complete the crime without bungling it and/or getting caught.

      I dunno, it was just an amusing mental image - door busted down, armed police peering into the bathroom, where the would-be assassin stands crouched over the toilet, repeatedly and desperately trying to flush the whole rifle down the loo.

      --
      Everything in moderation, including moderation itself
    8. Re:Patent your house brick arrangement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you got trolled again.

  42. Google- too ambitiuous for their own good by elrous0 · · Score: 1
    Google is spreading themselves so thin I beginning to wonder when I will see the headline "Google to map every particle in universe" or "Google to index God."

    If they're not careful, they're going to collapse under their over-ambition and lack of focus.

    Time to take a dose of ritalin and get some focus, kids.

    -Eric

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:Google- too ambitiuous for their own good by xintegerx · · Score: 1

      This should be modded up +5. The Google duo also wanted Google to sponsor space launches back in 2000, and their CEO had to talk them out of it.

  43. Trucks equipped with lasers? by suman28 · · Score: 1

    You mean sharks equipped with lasers, don't you?
    Throw me a fucking bone here :)

  44. Tantrum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    But I want Google Maps of Europe.
    I want it.
    I want it.
    I want it.
    NOW.

  45. LOL GoogleTank by LaserTank2005 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Heya! Seems to me that these kind of vehicles are cruising the cities now... http://storagetank.nordinary.com/GoogleTruck.jpg

  46. Epic by Mikey+Rowan · · Score: 1

    One giant leap for cartography. One even bigger leap for Google's 'let's justify our enormous market capitalisation' urge.

  47. Re:There is already a virtual London project at UC by Fulkkari · · Score: 4, Interesting

    There was a project to create a 3D model of Helsinki about 10 years ago in VRML. I think it was a part of some bigger project they called Arenanet, which included map services etc.

    The version I tried on the Net was basically quite ready in that sense that it had most if not all the buildings. The project however disappeared silently some years ago. There is still this site left with some panorama photos. The original site, arenanet.fi, does not exist any more. Some remnant may still be found at http://arenanet.fi/">the Internet Archive.

    Somebody know more about this project?

    --
    I demand the Cone of Silence!
  48. Re:LEEROY JENKINS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    LEEROY!!!!!

  49. Google VS A9 by jeffkjo1 · · Score: 1

    Google and A9 are a lot like little kids on the playground:

    "I've got the best search technology in the world."
    "Oh yea, well mines better now."
    "What?!? Well, now I've got maps of the world... from space."
    "Huh? No, I've got maps from space and ground level pictures of buildings in American cities."
    "Regular maps? I've got maps in 3D now."

    Of course, the difference is, Google and A9 are actually telling the truth, although I'd be wary if A9 starts talking about 'their Dad's flying car.'

    1. Re:Google VS A9 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe they call that competition...

    2. Re:Google VS A9 by Overzeetop · · Score: 0

      Hey, if Jeff wants to buyt the rights to the Molitor air car and take it out of the trickle-fund condition its in, I'm all for it. Top that, Google!

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  50. Re:There is already a virtual London project at UC by Fulkkari · · Score: 1

    Fixed link: http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://arenanet.fi.

    Slashdot seems to screw up that URL if you put it in <a>. Sorry!

    --
    I demand the Cone of Silence!
  51. The Matrix by fr2asbury · · Score: 1

    This is just information gathering for the coming Matrix. Well the Machine World had to get that data from somewhere!

  52. PennDot by kantellopo · · Score: 1

    kind of reminds me of this. I have found it useful in finding what places look like before i go there.. but it's mostly just for fun.

  53. Mapping near the coast? by noidentity · · Score: 1

    Please, oh please use laser-equipped sharks to map near the coast!

  54. So there I was toying with sending my resume... by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 1
    ...to Google 6 months ago thinking, "nah! what use have they for me when all I've done for the two years is develop photogrammetry software that actually works in the real world, how would that fit their business model?"

    On the other hand, from what I hear I'd have been paid peanuts if I worked there.

    --
    Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
    1. Re:So there I was toying with sending my resume... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the other hand, from what I hear I'd have been paid peanuts if I worked there.
      It's pretty clear why they didn't hire you then. There's more to a job than money.

    2. Re:So there I was toying with sending my resume... by cloudmaster · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Don't be so quick to discount peanuts. They're high in protein, and our good friend George Washington Carver spent a lifetime coming up with new uses for them...

    3. Re:So there I was toying with sending my resume... by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 1
      There's more to a job than money
      Employers just love it when people say that.
      --
      Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
  55. Hmm... by Dracolytch · · Score: 1

    Would this work better if we attached the frickin' lasers to animals (native and/or alien) and let them do the mapping?

    Sharks perhaps?

    ~D

    --
    This sig has been enciphered with a one-time pad. It could say almost anything.
  56. Google ride by $exyNerdie · · Score: 1


    http://graphics.stanford.edu/projects/cityblock/

    Now thats a nice job. Get in the Google/Stanford truck and drive around (don't forget to check out the Indian dude in Google truck. Talk about cheap labor)!

    1. Re:Google ride by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Indian dude is a PhD student, u stupid barf.

    2. Re:Google ride by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's still far cheaper compared to an American PhD, and disposable too.

  57. In Other Google News by The+Ape+With+No+Name · · Score: 1

    While teasing a Google-employed friend about the CIA-like secrecy about his team's project at Google the other day, I got him to admit the obvious: That he is working on a project to offer a particular type of information for free that a corporation currently charges for and insert ads in the search results. Well that's the current business model for Google, no? So he's the manager of the group and has an MS in Comp Sci and a JD (research specialist). Let the inferences begin! Look out Lexis-Nexis and WestLaw. Look Fucking Out.

    --
    Comparing it to Windows will be a moot point, since El Dorado is going to have a 40% larger code base than XP.
    1. Re:In Other Google News by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

      I wonder who Google will hire to replace him?

    2. Re:In Other Google News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL. That's the funniest thing I've read here in a long time.

  58. Re:ENOUGH with Google already! by Zerikai · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Wow, you saw 'Google' in the article title and you still clicked on it, just so you can whine... give me a break! I hope this article dupes a few times, just for you...

  59. Or by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

    Some company in Europe could do it first.
    DAMM Fiat and Peugeot for not selling their cars in the US. They are just evil! See how dumb it sounds?

    I mean really if some company in Sweden was going to do the same thing and started in Stockholm no one would be bitching.

    1. It is Google's home town so it makes sense to start there.
    2. The US is the largest "in money" single market in the world and Google is a US company. It only makes sense that the US gets service from Google first. It would be like complaining that Nokia introduced some cool new phone in Norway first.

    --
    See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  60. People wanting to work for Google...maybe not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I haven't seen any enthusiasm about working for google except on slashdot...really,at a career fair recently..google's booth was empty the whole time...people were infact throwing jokes at the recruiter about how they only want scientists. As it is, their recruiter was pathetic. While Microsoft's booth had a huge line, and always has good recruiters. google's search returns more irrelevant results everyday...i think these are the signs of a company which will go down in the next 5 years. They need a business model and Microsoft-like people, right now with scientists only...they are gonna fall big time. Except larry and brin, i haven't heard of any phd-type creating any innovative internet thing.

  61. Well.. as usual, the Europeans got there first by gbjbaanb · · Score: 1

    Europe is already here, doing quite nicely thank you.

    http://www.gta-geo.com/eng/home_e.html

    Geoinformatik GmbH has modelled the whole of Coburg (about 50km).

    Blinking Germans, when are they going to get round to doing Australia. There are other places in the world outside Europe you know! :-)

    1. Re:Well.. as usual, the Europeans got there first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quite nicely? Although the single static picture looks good, I could not get to a map and, although the page is vague, it would appear to me that this is a paid product.

    2. Re:Well.. as usual, the Europeans got there first by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Where is Europe? Is it near New York? :) Australia I know. It is just a bit south west of LA :)

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  62. Phew... by Momoru · · Score: 1

    For a second I thought maybe Google had done something to improve it's search...thank god its just another completely unrelated thing.

  63. The could spend their time more productlively by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...like, for instance, putting junction numbers on motorways on maps.google.co.uk (without which the maps are useless for long-distance directions).

  64. Aha! So they ARE developing Virtual Light glasses. by luckbat · · Score: 1

    Huh. Of all the visions of the future William Gibson wrote about, I never expected Virtual Light would turn out to be the accurate one.

  65. will they also paint big red and white targets by oldwarrior · · Score: 0

    on all of the important buildings?

    --
    If it were done when 'tis done, then t'were well it were done quickly... MacBeth
  66. How is this funny? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, really...I'm curious.

    1. Re:How is this funny? by fbg111 · · Score: 1

      How is this funny?

      You must be new here... ;)

      FYI: Austin Powers + /. Lore = Funny.

      --
      Flying is easy, just throw yourself at the ground and miss. -Douglas Adams
  67. Google funded Stanford Project by Byrnie · · Score: 1

    Check out the link to the "Google Funded" project page. You think they could do a little better than one guy with a camer sitting in the back of an Izuzu Amiga.

  68. WOW! a cash cow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Think of the cash cow such data would be. They could license out their 3d cities to video game publishers. Rockstar could churn out Grand Theft Auto for decades to come...

  69. Throw me a frickin' bone here by TeknoType · · Score: 1

    I said SHARKS with lasers attached to their heads...

  70. Most of these posts.... by icejai · · Score: 1

    are saying that this is a huge waste and pretty much pointless, and how Google does cool things first and then figures out how to make money off it later. But I believe that Google already knows how to make money off this.

    Google makes money by selling advertising "words"... auction-style. Now imagine the space that 'words' encompass. It's friggn huge.

    Now imagine how Google can make scads of money if they sell nearly limitless virtual billboards to advertisers for people using these 3D maps.

    Advertiser want to put up a virtual billboard advertising a hotel when you do a virtual fly-through of the San Fransisco Bay area?

    "Who's the highest bidder?".

    Trump want to stick his big "TRUMP" letters on virtual models of his own hotels and casinos? He's gotta pay up.

    I think this has the potential to make Google lots more advertising revenue, once they scan more cities, and make this tool free for the public.

    And heck, maybe subscribers to this 3D map service can bypass the ads!

  71. great. by Bongzilla · · Score: 0

    What's the business reason for this?

    You know, people on Wall Street do make an effort to notice when companies are throwing away tons of money. Especially in times like this.

    I would guess that Google's stock prices are going to look more and more inflated at this rate. They keep doing all these side projects, none of which contribute to their core enterprise. They could have their employees doing analysis of foreign searches for intel purposes instead. Or working on personalized search results for selected Google users (blackholing some people or grooming results for others)

    Or maybe there's not much for Google employees to be doing after all.

    --

    ;///////////////////////////////////////////////// /
  72. Does anybody find irony... by Virtua+Omake · · Score: 1

    in the fact that if you click the google category at the top, you get the messaged: Sorry, search is down at the moment. Until it's back up, you may wish to search Slashdot through Google

  73. google already does 2d by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    maps.google.com and click on "satellite"

  74. RayBan by kalirion · · Score: 1

    Will they provide residents of San Francisco with sunglasses to avoid being blinded by the lasers?

  75. Right on! by ImaLamer · · Score: 1

    Let's not forget that they are a corporation with a charter from the State of Delaware, oh wait...

  76. Two words: by Jack+Taylor · · Score: 1

    Counterstrike maps!

    --
    One good turn - gets all the covers.
  77. What 3D Mapping Looks Like by mtz206 · · Score: 1

    To see what this might look like, check out this page from a Berkeley student working on 3D city modeling.

  78. Terrorism? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do we have to worry about vitual terrorism training in a simulator using this tool?

  79. Your post corrected: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Until then, just refuse to pay the bills [Google] sends you. I mean, if you're not getting what you pay for... [...] Never mind that I'd rather see something like this done in Europe, as well, since [a US passport is getting less and less welcome abroad]

    Anyway, what's stopping you personally from mapping your favorite area, and giving the results away for public use? I'd imagine that the stuff Google's using is available for purchase and use by other people, too. Set up the site, don't charge me to use it, and I'll happily consume your bandwidth and computing resourses. Heck, I'll even provide helpful unrequested input as to what cities you should [have mapped first].

  80. Why not 4D ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The cities are changing. It would be cool to aim
    at the specific location, look at it with the 3D
    image, and then move back in time.
    Surely, moving forward in time would be even cooler. :)

  81. I wonder if they can forgo the laser. by Eric+S.+Smith · · Score: 1

    It seems to me that it should be possible to get all of the information that they need by taking multiple, overlapping pictures (say, video frames). Image analysis could get the various scale and perspective issues worked out after the fact, and save them the time and hassle of the laser measurements.

    Or maybe the image processing would take so long that the laser turns out to be faster anyway. But is there an eye-safety issue, lasering arbitary objects on the street?

  82. Excellent! by luckyguesser · · Score: 1

    Stand really still for a couple of passes, and you could be a statue .. in .. SF.. oh, never mind.

    --


    The power of Christ compiles you.
    A Random Blog
  83. THE METAVERSE HOORAY! by spentrent · · Score: 1

    Now they need to add 3D hookers.

  84. I luv google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I love google for being innovative and coming up with great ideas all the time. That's one thing that really gets me with M$. The amount of money they have and what innovations have they come out with, the laser mouse? All their software was either bought, stolen or just the same old thing. llamas.

  85. You're-a-pee-in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Screw Europe. If they want to map some-run down third-world country, map some place we can drive to, like Mexico. Or maybe Canada.

  86. Virtual driving... by ChickenFan · · Score: 1

    One thing I don't like about driving in unfamiliar cities is try to figure out which lane to be in for turns, which side of the street my destination is on an where to park.

    Google's maps+satellite service allows me to see lane markings on roads so figuring out which lane to be in on a crowded city street easy now.

    I always thought though how cool it would be to take a virtual drive around an unfamiliar city - complete with proper road markings, lanes, stop lights, etc. Modern PCs are capable enough - it just requires a massive database... which Google may not be building.

    Virtual driving allows you to familiarize yourself with every aspect of a real trip (except perhaps for roadworks / accidents).

    It would also allow you to tour a city, or if you're released from the virtual driver's seat, soar above it.

    Science fiction? Maybe not.

  87. Gaming by Razzak · · Score: 1

    Lots of games use realistic settings. I'm thinking of The Getaway which has a very very realistic setting in London.

    Wouldn't this make a great starting point for game developers that want realistic settings in cities? Seems like this would be about 75% of the work if there's a way to easily import it.

  88. Star Wars by Muhammar · · Score: 1

    "Google plans to use trucks equipped with lasers ... San Francisco, and eventually other major US cities."

    Microsoft has trucks with lasers too. And they are armored.

    --
    I doubt that we will ever figure out - and I suspect that even if we did figure out we couldn't do much about it
  89. Keeping it relevant by pasdemoi · · Score: 1

    Kudos to Google for bringing yet another cool computer trick to the masses, but don't forget that they're targeting the *extremely* competitive space of local search, which everyone expects to be a HUGE source of $$ in the search space over the coming years (especially as the "pay for search terms" income levels off).

    Assuming this photographic technique works, the question I have is how Google intends to keep it relevant.

    It's one thing to photograph all the buildings once, but buildings (or facades) come and go with surprising frequency (think restaurants). Are they going to maintain a fleet of trucks rolling by every month on every city street throughout the US (or world), or is this a one-time snapshot? If the latter, it would be a fun intellectual curiosity, but not something on which you could base your local search product.

  90. Just Great by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

    I can see the Tenderloin in 3D now...

    Are they going to capture all the homeless, drug addicts, and hookers in 3D, too? My cheapass hotel I'm living in?

    --
    Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  91. Sneek preview by hotspotbloc · · Score: 1

    Here's a sneak preview of an image of the Golden Gate Bridge. LA and Vegas are next.

    --
    "I hate to advocate drugs, alcohol, violence or insanity but they've always worked for me" - HST
  92. Building Blueprints by trefoil · · Score: 1

    wouldn't it be faster to go to a civics office, acquire blueprints and algorithmically build the wire structures, and then remap the pictures?

  93. "Normal" Google Maps for other countries? by harmonica · · Score: 1

    I'd very much like to get Google Maps Germany. Does anyone know whether that is this in the pipeline?

  94. MMORPG? by mnmn · · Score: 1

    Google with all their good intentions could also create a big MMORPG in which all city maps are real cities, and gamers can only start in, and own their actual home areas.

    Great way to socialize and meet the ladies around.

    Until people use the same maps to play UT and CS. You can kill the neighbors cat multiple times then.

    --
    "Give orange me give eat orange me eat orange give me eat orange give me you." -Nim Chimpsky
  95. finally by asscroft · · Score: 1

    I've been talking about this for years, literally, since the first maps came out on the internet. I played duke nukem and then I went to map something on the same day, and I said to myself, why isn't this in 3-D. How hard can that be?

    Well, apparently it was too hard for everyone except google. All hail, the mighty google.

    --
    because I have been enjoined by this Holy Office to abandon the false opinion which maintains that the Sun is the centre
  96. 3D GoogleMap of SF by Frozentech · · Score: 1

    I've been told by Motorola project engineers that SF is the most difficult city in the US to do RF propogation surveys in ( basically wardriving every street in the city measuring uhf and 800 MHz coverage), due to the terrain, stucture and especially the one way streets. A clever person who integrates accurate RF propogation prediction algorithms with this 3D GoogleMap feature could make a pretty penny! (oh wait, Google would C&D them, right ? )

  97. SF's Hilly!!! by Palal · · Score: 1

    It's good that they picked SF! It's close to their HQ, it's hilly (this'll let 'em test their technology), and the best part, I can use it for 3D modeling (if they ever release it that is!)

    --
    -Palal