Slashdot Mirror


Rockstar's Next Game Draws Protesters

Rockstar's next title, Bully, has already come under fire from anti-bullying groups. Activists have taken it up another notch, though, by demonstrating outside of the NY Rockstar offices. They've also laid out a list of demands to the game developer, hoping to get the company to change its ways. The Peaceoholics demand Rockstar "Not to release Bully under any circumstances, Volunteer to sell its violent and sexually explicit games in adult video stores only, Let parents return Grand Theft Auto for a full refund until they do a national awareness campaign to educate parents of content and possible effects, Create a fund for victims of unauthorized use of a motor vehicle and car-jackings, etc, Make a national apology for misleading and lying to children, parents, and legislators about their intentions and causing insurance premiums to sky rocket, Give a written response within five business days of receipt of these demands" Press the Buttons has commentary, and uses some words I'd like to myself.

207 comments

  1. Good job Zonk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Duping your own submission http://games.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/08/02/ 2229237&tid=10 Yeah, "news" this is not.

    1. Re:Good job Zonk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The questions remains: will he go for the threepeat?

      My money is on "yes." Well, it would be if I had any money.

      The saddest thing is that the original was only two days ago.

    2. Re:Good job Zonk by j-turkey · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually, the post links the original submission and is a follow-up. This is not a dupe, and is OK by me.

      --

      -Turkey

  2. wow by PhilippeT · · Score: 1

    Wow... now I know what to be thankful of next thanksgiving... thank god I'm not Rockstar

    --
    A psychopath can't tell the difference between right and wrong. A sociopath knows the difference - he just doesn't care.
  3. ROFLMAO by pudding7 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    AHAHAHAHA AHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAlLOLOLOLOLLo!!!!!eleventyone!!!111 !!

    Those "demands" are hilarious.

  4. Protesters? by turtled · · Score: 2, Funny

    I though it was, and had to re-read, but it's NOT "prostitutes"

    --
    "I cannot think of any need in childhood as strong as the need for a father's protection." -- Sigmund Freud
  5. A list of demands? by Quattro+Vezina · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Aren't lists of demands what terrorists give when they hold people hostage?

    --
    I support the Center for Consumer Freedom
    1. Re:A list of demands? by UltraAyla · · Score: 1

      "we love peace so much that we're holding you hostage" - they give new meaning to the term "liberal commies." I'm liberal myself, but they're the kind of people who I look at and hide myself and say "I don't know them."

    2. Re:A list of demands? by rbarreira · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, but also "correlation doesn't imply causation".

      --

      The AACS key is NOT 0xF606EEFD628B1CA427BEA93A9CA9773F
    3. Re:A list of demands? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      Comparing people protesting the creation of games which simulate and encourage antisocial behavior to terrorists gets modded up as "Insightful"?

      I weep for society.

    4. Re:A list of demands? by Couldn'tCareLess · · Score: 1
      Indeed, a whole new meaning to the word.

      Liberal means the almost exact opposite of what they are.

    5. Re:A list of demands? by wed128 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I believe any attempt to attack my or anyone else's right to free speach an act of extreme anti-patriotism...

      Who else can we think of as anti-patriot?

    6. Re:A list of demands? by UltraAyla · · Score: 1

      true - stupid me - dunno what I was thinking - they're obviously trying to keep things as they are rather than change them. Thanks

    7. Re:A list of demands? by mconeone · · Score: 1

      That would make the Bush Administration quite liberal... As many things have changed since it began (gas prices, unemployment rates, the defecit, wars, the country becoming a police state... I can go on forever)

    8. Re:A list of demands? by UltraAyla · · Score: 1

      yeah, I really oughta stop while I'm behind, huh?

    9. Re:A list of demands? by Tanmi-Daiow · · Score: 1

      Phew, i thought you said anti-parrot. i was wondering what an anti parrot was....phew...

      --
      "Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive." - C.S. Lewis
    10. Re:A list of demands? by Couldn'tCareLess · · Score: 1
      What? Someone wishing to change something does not automatically become a liberal. If the changes they wish to introduce stifle free expression or increase intolerance for others' ideas and behaviours, then this is a conservative change, not liberal.

      Thanks.

    11. Re:A list of demands? by James_Aguilar · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      FYI so that you don't sound ignorant when you complain about things:

      1) Unemployment is down.
      2) The administration, no matter what you would like to believe, has very little control over gas prices. As long as environmental groups continue preventing the exploitation of Alaska's oil reserves.

      As for wars, it is true, that has changed, but I have to believe that a lot of it had to do with 9/11, and most of this war stuff wouldn't have happened without it. The same goes for the deficit (wars -> deficit). As for the police state comment, that's just a polemic attack with little basis.

      That will be all.

    12. Re:A list of demands? by Orne · · Score: 1

      Correllation does imply causation, but correllation is not causation.

  6. Peaceaholics pleading to Bush by BlackCobra43 · · Score: 2, Funny

    The irony is so sharp I cut myself.

    --
    I never spellcheck and I freely admit it. Save your karma for more worthwhile "lol erorrs" replies
  7. Personal Responsibility is Dead... by xTMFWahoo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I can't understand why no one blames the parents for subjecting their children to violent video games. It's the parents responsibility to monitor their kids- what TV shows/movies they watch, what video games they play ect.

    Parents need to start doing their jobs IMHO.

    --
    "Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it." Mark Twain.
    1. Re:Personal Responsibility is Dead... by PhilippeT · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That's when parents will tell you that you (and everyone else) have no right to tell them how to raise their children.

      In my book parents shouldn't be allowed to harm their child via negligence.

      This includes letting them play a game, watching TV, etc... without understand that the actions in them is not always meant to be repeated.

      Meaning if you see someone going into space it doesn't mean you will never be able to. If you work hard you may be able to. But it does mean that if in game XYZ you can hit people with a hammer and they make funny noises it's not real and you shouldn't do it.

      That's my 2 cents

      --
      A psychopath can't tell the difference between right and wrong. A sociopath knows the difference - he just doesn't care.
    2. Re:Personal Responsibility is Dead... by negative3 · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Absolutely.

      Ignorance of the law is not a defense in a courtroom, so how can "responsible" parents use that as an excuse when it comes to raising their own children?

      When I was young, my parents let me watch whatever I wanted (within reason) and play whatever I wanted (then again, I grew up with NES, so that's probably a bit of a stretch). BUT they did explain to me the difference between right and wrong and gave me a good clue about how to conduct myself as a member of a civilized society.

      Why don't we start protesting the protest group by giving them a list of demands? I'll start one:

      • raise your own kids and let us raise ours
      • stop making it harder for responsible adults to buy violent games
      • start a fund to pay for the migraine medicine for the headaches you cause reasonable, intelligent people
      • if these demands aren't met within 5 days of receipt, we'll know you have no sense of humor either
      --
      "Physics is to math what sex is to masturbation." - Richard Feynman
    3. Re:Personal Responsibility is Dead... by joeljkp · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Good thing blaming the parents is damned easy.

      I wouldn't want to come up with an actual good policy solution that will let parents and kids both keep their freedom and also reduce the harm that some of this stuff causes when it inevitably gets into their hands.

      Rather, I think I'll just lobby the government to allow porn, liquor, and drugs to flow through the streets, then jail the parents of any kid who reaches out and touches it.

      --
      WeRelate.org - wiki-based genealogy
    4. Re:Personal Responsibility is Dead... by KamaDragon · · Score: 1
      I wouldn't want to come up with an actual good policy solution that will let parents and kids both keep their freedom and also reduce the harm that some of this stuff causes when it inevitably gets into their hands.

      What harm is that, exactly? I watch porn, drink alcohol, play violent games, and watch violent movies. I'm also a productive and rational member of society.

      --
      -KD
    5. Re:Personal Responsibility is Dead... by Soul-Burn666 · · Score: 1

      Unfortunatly, I just lost my mod points.
      I agree with everything said.

      MOD PARENT UP!

      --
      ^_^
    6. Re:Personal Responsibility is Dead... by Deorus · · Score: 1

      > I wouldn't want to come up with an actual good policy solution that will let parents and kids both keep their freedom and also reduce the harm that some of this stuff causes when it inevitably gets into their hands.

      Can you prove by any means that the crime rate is in any way related with video games?

      > Rather, I think I'll just lobby the government to allow porn, liquor, and drugs to flow through the streets, then jail the parents of any kid who reaches out and touches it.

      I don't think anyone has suggested arresting parents for allowing their kids to play violent videogames either, you are the one implicitly suggesting such a thing. What the parent poster meant was that parents are responsible for the content they allow their children to interact with. Rockstar produces games and rates them accordingly. If parents choose to ignore those ratings and allow their children to play, whose fault is it?

    7. Re:Personal Responsibility is Dead... by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      That's when parents will tell you that you (and everyone else) have no right to tell them how to raise their children.

      And that's when you tell them that they should look in the fucking mirror because advocating for regulation of this stuff is telling people how to raise their children. Telling parent's that it's their responsiblilty to keep this stuff out of their kids hands if they don't want the kids to have it is the exact opposite of telling parents how to raise their kids; it's telling them that the way they raise their kids is up to them and not up to the government.

    8. Re:Personal Responsibility is Dead... by ivan256 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      reduce the harm that some of this stuff causes when it inevitably gets into their hands.

      Exposure doesn't cause harm. Exposure without understanding causes harm.

      Since it's near impossible to shield children from all exposure from things their parents find objectionable, you could say that the lack of exposure causes harm, since without exposure there is no understanding.

      Hiding things you disapprove of is bad. When they see something you don't like, don't cover their eyes, explain why it's bad. That way you have control over what they think about that thing. Otherwise they will be exposed to it when you're not around and forming their own opinions; opinions you may not approve of. Children don't learn your values if you hide them. This isn't limited to children either. Censorship in almost all forms is bad for this reason.

      Have you ever seen a group of kids catch a glimpse of nudity in an 'R' rated film? You can tell the difference between the kids with parents who hide such things from their children and the kids with parents who teach them about those things. The kids who's parents have explained what was happening tend to cover their eyes when the nudity comes on. The kids who have never been exposed to it get really wide-eyed.

    9. Re:Personal Responsibility is Dead... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kids are people too you know. They're entitled to their own opinions. They're not supposed to be a copy of you, with every attitude replicated in miniature.

      Respect your kids and they will respect you. Treat them as adults and they'll act like them - or at least as much as any of us do.

    10. Re:Personal Responsibility is Dead... by brkello · · Score: 1

      Good thing being sarcastic on slashdot gets you mod points even if you don't actually make a point. You do the same thing you accuse others of doing. It's easy to say "create a good policy". Why don't you try to a) come up with one b) get it to someone who will try to push it through without tacking on a law that says that Intelligent Design should be taught in public schools. In any case, there has to be a line...and at a certain point parent need to be held responsible for their kids. We have an adequate system for determining what games kids play. If parents are too stupid to figure this out, maybe they shouldn't be having kids in the first place (oh, if only we could pass a law preventing idiots from reproducing). So either come up with a policy that is better than what we already have, or don't bitch at people blaming the parents. Yeah, everyone is saying it, but there is a reason that that is the majority opinion on here. Parents are messing up.

      --
      Support a great indie game: http://www.abaddon360.com
    11. Re:Personal Responsibility is Dead... by PhoenixOne · · Score: 1
      Would you call this an "either-or" or "false dilemma" fallacy?

      "We shouldn't ban all violent media. Rather, I think we should hit kids with baseball bats."

      --
      Spell cheek you've failed me four the last thyme!
    12. Re:Personal Responsibility is Dead... by strikethree · · Score: 1

      It is funny. I need to keep a "personal responsibility" post ready for all of these Violent Video Game (tm) stories so I can get some free karma(re: GP). Then, you get a +5 insightful by saying, "I wouldn't want to come up with an actual good policy solution that will let parents and kids both keep their freedom and also reduce the harm that some of this stuff causes when it inevitably gets into their hands.", and yet nobody questions the fact that you assume that harm WILL occur by having kids play these games. I would mod you down but I do not waste mod points with negative mods (usually) and I figured a reply would bring out your error in a more obvious manner. Can I see some proof that children (or anyone else!) will be harmed by violent video games please?

      strike (I forgot the click the unwilling to moderate box again.)

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
    13. Re:Personal Responsibility is Dead... by Thing+1 · · Score: 1
      Since it's near impossible to shield children from all exposure from things their parents find objectionable, you could say that the lack of exposure causes harm, since without exposure there is no understanding.

      Let's be done with it already, then! We're all going to live forever; so we just make children illegal and then we won't have to "think of the children!" ever again.

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
  8. In case my comment seems out of place by BlackCobra43 · · Score: 1

    The Peaceaholics ALSO sent demands to Bush to "save them". This is just further hilarity. If you don't like it mod down and move on.

    --
    I never spellcheck and I freely admit it. Save your karma for more worthwhile "lol erorrs" replies
  9. Not to say I like the idea... by sH4RD · · Score: 3, Funny

    But the anti-bullies are bullying the creators of Bully.

    How ironic.

    --
    WASTE - The Secure P2P
    1. Re:Not to say I like the idea... by sykjoke · · Score: 1

      That's funny, I'm sure I saw a few of them at pro-life meetings too.

    2. Re:Not to say I like the idea... by stonecypher · · Score: 1

      I agree with the sentiment, but that's not what irony means.

      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
  10. The Response by Deathlizard · · Score: 5, Funny

    Dear Peaceoholics

    No.

    Love Rockstar Games.

    PS: Reserve your Copy of Bully today!

    1. Re:The Response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mmmmm, I loves my Peaceohol.

    2. Re:The Response by Mitsoid · · Score: 2, Interesting

      People are just protesting because they need someone besides themselves to blame. If you kid is going behind your back to play a Mature game, take the power cord for the computer/video game console to work with you... I'm not saying carry it around with you at work.. I'm saying put it in your vehicle and do what you need to do... it takes -1- minute and you garuntee your kid wont be playing games without your consent for the day... Rockstar is NOT to blame.. it's the Stores kids buy them at, or the parents whom are to blame (if not both, sometimes) Rockstar clearly shows the warning ESRB tells it to place on it's game... And stores are supposed to ID kids who buy "M" rated games.... Parents are supposed to buy most of Rockstar's games -- if it'll end up in the hands of minors... and therefore have been warned. Rockstar did it's part, It's free from any legal (or social, in my opinion) obligation to warn the public. If my truck gets stolen, and they find out it's some GTA-psycho... I'm not blaming rockstar, I'm blaming the kid (or his parents).. I'm NOT going to go after Rockstar.. I'm going after the person (or the kids parents)... Just my 2 cents.. Go ahead and attack me for speaking my mind, it's your right to do so... arn't you glad you have freedom to choose?

    3. Re:The Response by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      " If my truck gets stolen, and they find out it's some GTA-psycho... I'm not blaming rockstar, I'm blaming the kid (or his parents).. I'm NOT going to go after Rockstar.. I'm going after the person (or the kids parents)... Just my 2 cents.. Go ahead and attack me for speaking my mind, it's your right to do so... arn't you glad you have freedom to choose?"

      I wouldn't go after Rockstar, either. I have a different reason, though: There are more than 30 million copies of various incarnations of GTA out there. You'd think with numbers like that, crime would have gone up. Nope. Didn't happen with GTA. Didn't happen with Doom. Didn't happen with Mortal Kombat. Then I have to think about my own experience. I played all these games to death. Despite that, I still shudder at sites like Rotten.com. Desensitized... right.

      I really don't come from a position where I can blame Rockstar or Acclaim or any other game company for wrongs that have happened to me. I am quite comfortable, however, blaming the asshole that thought it'd be fun to break into my car.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    4. Re:The Response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      amen to that hahahhaha

    5. Re:The Response by Malevolyn · · Score: 1

      Would anyone be surprised if this was the real response? Considering the games Rockstar makes, at least.

      --
      Your ad here.
    6. Re:The Response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mmmmm, I loves my Peaceohol.

      I'm totally like a Peaceoholic, except for booze.

    7. Re:The Response by Datamonstar · · Score: 1

      ... hahahaha ... ... What's that supposed to mean? You fail to remember that they are a legitimate company. Yes, games are happy happy fun fun, but the companies that make them are serious companies that take requests such as this one, and the Hot Coffee fiasco seriously. Just like any other company. They're not a bunch kids working on games in their garage.

      --
      The eternal struggle of good vs. evil begins within one's self.
  11. "...and uses some words I'd like to myself." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, I think he specifically DIDN'T use those particular words. Good thing too, who knows how many children's minds he could have corrupted!

  12. Arrogance that could power a city. by WidescreenFreak · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Karma be damned! I'm pissed now!

    Okay, first off, who is this group to think that they have some kind of moral obligation to place demands on Rockstar that must be answered within five days? What are they going to do if Rockstar ignores them, as I hope they will? Stage another protest with even more demands?

    Secondly, I want to congratulate them for increasing by an order of magnitude my desire to purchase both Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas and Bully when available, even though I will probably let them sit on my shelf unopened, as amy way of showing support for Rockstar.

    These people need to realize that we gamers are a much more powerful force, financially speaking, than they are with their holier-than-thou moralism. They're giving Rockstar more advertising than they could have possibly imagined. If only such arrogance and desire to force their morality could be harnessed...

    Listen, Peaceoholics, you are more than welcome to create your own gaming company that offers a line of products that are much more rooted in your personal morals. I have no doubt that you will sell millions of games, as long as they're entertaining and of a marketable value. Until that time, Rockstar that the right to sell whatever products the core gaming populous (males aged 18-35) want to purchase. Deal with it.

    --
    The Overrated mod is for reversing inappropriate, positive mods, not for voicing disagreement with a post.
    1. Re:Arrogance that could power a city. by PhilippeT · · Score: 0

      Damn straight if I only had mod points.

      Telling a company they can't produce XYZ because it may effect children's minds is completely different then letting parents know that these games shouldn't make it into the hands of kids.

      An ounce of knowledge in this case is worth more then you could ever imagine.

      --
      A psychopath can't tell the difference between right and wrong. A sociopath knows the difference - he just doesn't care.
    2. Re:Arrogance that could power a city. by Soul-Burn666 · · Score: 1

      I don't know if I'd rather they ignore them or send them a letter "with two words" as stated in the article.

      About the game, try it, it's fun.

      --
      ^_^
    3. Re:Arrogance that could power a city. by FidelCatsro · · Score: 1

      Perhaps these Peaceaholics need a 12 step program off an 11 step peer.
      I wouldn't worry too much about the effects they are having on Rockstar , unless of course your a member of the group as all they are doing is giving the game some wonderful publicity.
      Let them protest i say , its their right to do the work of Rockstar's PR department if they wish .
      they can make demand after demand after demand and get as much media attention as possible .

      When they finally get to court and discover that it is protect free speech(as is my understanding , correct me if I'm wrong) they may actually realise how bloody stupid they were being.
      The game most likely deserves a 14+ rating , well i say 14 as I'm probably a lot more permissive than most ,Well a mature rating indeed (decide amongst yourself what you think mature enough is)
      I have no problem with advisory censorship , It's fairly harmless so long as it stay advisory only and is never enforceable

      Or to be less polite ,
      these bar-stards need to go jump in a crocodile pit and stop telling me how to live my life

      --
      The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
    4. Re:Arrogance that could power a city. by BitGeek · · Score: 1


      I find it amazing that GTA has been out in a variety of versions, and far more violent games are out there as well, with little complaint.

      But someone manages to unlock some code showing tits and suddenly all hell is breaking loose?

      Its boob-gate all over again.

      Bottom line is, if Rockstar wants to release a game with really kinky sex, its their right. This is the very definition of free speech.

      All this whining over some boobs (or is the real outrage that it shows a black man and a white woman?) just shows how out of line people's priorities are... and how much people seem to want to control other people.

      You don't like it, don't buy it. It should end with that.

      --
      Yeah, and you guys panned the ipod too: http://apple.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/10/23/ 1816257
    5. Re:Arrogance that could power a city. by dasunt · · Score: 3, Informative

      If you are annoyed with them, TELL THEM.

      Google tells me that the Peaceoholics organization in the District of Columbia has a website as (surprise) peaceoholics.org

      Guess what, they also have a Contact Form!

    6. Re:Arrogance that could power a city. by Zutroy+Of+Earth · · Score: 1

      > If only such arrogance and desire to force their morality could be harnessed...

      And what makes you think that it isn't ?

      Think about it :)

    7. Re:Arrogance that could power a city. by ogonek · · Score: 1
      They're giving Rockstar more advertising than they could have possibly imagined. If only such arrogance and desire to force their morality could be harnessed...

      Dude, don't you see it? Peacoholics are a group infiltrated and secretly run by Rockstar. They are just a puppet organisation.

    8. Re:Arrogance that could power a city. by trixillion · · Score: 1

      Okay, first off, do you really not reallize that the only reason you are reading about this stuff is because Rockstar Games marketing department is paying off (aka PR) news outlets to promote these nutjobs' protest. This is nothing but really cheap promotions for Rockstar Games. Rockstar is using the nutjobs and I think that is great. But don't be fooled and get sucked into thinking this is anything other than a well crafted drama, built for the consumption of the mass audience. Nothing makes the news for free except dead people. Do you really think this little mom and pop protest has the money or know-how to get their protest on the news. Jeez there must be thousands of protest across america every day.

    9. Re:Arrogance that could power a city. by Norfair · · Score: 1

      For a second, I read that as 'mules aged 18-35'. Hey, I could be onto something here!

    10. Re:Arrogance that could power a city. by stungod · · Score: 1

      My sentiments exactly.

      Here we have a game where stealing cars, killing cops and doing death-defying stunts (well, death-defying the third time through) is perfectly fine. No complaints from politicians above the general noise level of outrage that these people seem to feel towards everything not featured in "Leave it to Beaver" and no ass clowns protesting outside Rockstar's offices.

      But bring sex into it and suddenly these guys are harming America far more than people who steal cars, kill cops and do death-defying stunts in real life.

      I'm sorry but I can't seem to wrap my brain around the idea that even the most deviant sexual behavior could somehow be less morally acceptable than killing somebody.

      So, since I haven't seen the offensive sexual content in GTA yet, can somebody clue me in here. Was there bondage? Gay sex? Bestiality? Something scatological? What could have been in that hidden scene that was worse than murder?

      Don't get me wrong. I honestly don't believe that video game behavior directly causes similar behavior in real life. Otherwise, I would have leveled several small towns with my hand-held rocket launcher.

      Whatever damage these games do to our kids' abillity to restrain themselves from violent behavior, it's nothing compared to the the completely fucked up messages they're getting about the evils of sex. No wonder Viagra and the like are selling so well...if you spend your whole childhood learning now bad, dirty, offensive, and just plain wrong sex is you're not going to be very well equipped (no pun intended) to participate in it in a healthy way.

    11. Re:Arrogance that could power a city. by milkman_matt · · Score: 1

      So, since I haven't seen the offensive sexual content in GTA yet, can somebody clue me in here. Was there bondage? Gay sex? Bestiality? Something scatological? What could have been in that hidden scene that was worse than murder?

      Dry humping. It's evil and bad.

      Don't get me wrong. I honestly don't believe that video game behavior directly causes similar behavior in real life. Otherwise, I would have leveled several small towns with my hand-held rocket launcher.

      You've got better self control than I, ever since I tried State of Emergency I've had this unrelenting urge to run through shopping malls beating people with baseball bats!

    12. Re:Arrogance that could power a city. by mahdi13 · · Score: 1

      Nicely said!

      I wonder if these protesters have ever heard of Running With Scissors?

      First mission in Postal2 you have to deal with people just like this. Gasoline was never so much fun!

      --
      "Some things have to be believed to be seen." - Ralph Hodgson
    13. Re:Arrogance that could power a city. by LilBlackDemon · · Score: 1

      That scene contained *gasp* consensual sexual intercourse. That's right, good old regular sex. Personally, I haven't played the game with the modification installed (I find that having sex in games is pretty much useless to any type of story), but I have seen pictures and a video floating around if you google them.

    14. Re:Arrogance that could power a city. by 2008 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Good idea! I sent this:

      My List of Demands for Peaceaholics

      # Not to produce further press releases under any circumstances.
      # Volunteer to promote its anti-fun and anti-freedom agenda in organic food markets only.
      # Let those people affected by your activities apply to have the ten minutes of their lives fully refunded.
      # Not to do a national awareness campaign to propagandise about possible effects, but to jointly fund with a game publisher an unbiased study based on the scientific method to attempt to find any actual effects.
      # Create a fund for victims of pressure groups.
      # Make a national apology for misleading and lying to children, parents, and legislators and causing share prices to plummet.
      # Give a written response in the New York and Los Angeles Times within five business days of receipt of these demands.

      -------Original list for comparison:

      Peaceoholics List of Demands for Rock Star Games

      # Not to release Bully under any circumstances
      # Volunteer to sell its violent and sexually explicit games in adult video stores only.
      # Let parents return Grand Theft Auto for a full refund until they do a national awareness campaign to educate parents of content and possible effects.
      # Create a fund for victims of unauthorized use of a motor vehicle and car-jackings, etc.
      # Make a national apology for misleading and lying to children, parents, and legislators about their intentions and causing insurance premiums to sky rocket.
      # Give a written response within five business days of receipt of these demands

      --
      I quit!
    15. Re:Arrogance that could power a city. by westlake · · Score: 1
      Bottom line is, if Rockstar wants to release a game with really kinky sex, its their right. This is the very definition of free speech.

      The state has the right to limit the sale of pornography to the red light district of your local adult book store. It has the right to demand ID.

      Interesting to see a Slashdot post defending the constitutional rights of big business.

    16. Re:Arrogance that could power a city. by mobby_6kl · · Score: 1

      >Listen, Peaceoholics, you are more...

      Aaah! Up to this point I thought you were talking about the UN! Nice post, anyway.

    17. Re:Arrogance that could power a city. by brkello · · Score: 1

      So, ummmm, very dramatic. But why would you worry about your karma when you are are spouting off the same opinion everyone else is that is getting modded up? Maybe you were worried about your karma because you should have been modded redundant?

      --
      Support a great indie game: http://www.abaddon360.com
    18. Re:Arrogance that could power a city. by WidescreenFreak · · Score: 1

      { applause }

      --
      The Overrated mod is for reversing inappropriate, positive mods, not for voicing disagreement with a post.
    19. Re:Arrogance that could power a city. by scabb · · Score: 1

      Hee! Their front page has a most excellent typo as well, which I'm far too excited about noticing.

    20. Re:Arrogance that could power a city. by westlake · · Score: 1
      These people need to realize that we gamers are a much more powerful force, financially speaking, than they are with their holier-than-thou moralism

      I wouldn't take any bets on that.

      Not that it matters. Hot Coffee took GTA back into the political arena, where Rockstar stumbled badly at the start and took a butt-kicking from the pros.

    21. Re:Arrogance that could power a city. by DerekLyons · · Score: 1
      These people need to realize that we gamers are a much more powerful force, financially speaking, than they are with their holier-than-thou moralism.
      Ah, yes. Your holier-than-thou moralism means more than theirs.

      It all makes perfect sense now.

    22. Re:Arrogance that could power a city. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would that I had "troll" or at least "overrated" mod points right now. Since I don't, I'll just tell you what an ass you are.

    23. Re:Arrogance that could power a city. by PygmySurfer · · Score: 1

      The state has the right to limit the sale of pornography to the red light district of your local adult book store. It has the right to demand ID.

      Funny, I thought stores were supposed to ask for ID when someone purchases an "M" rated game.

  13. Keep it up... by Momoru · · Score: 2, Funny

    Rockstar's next title, Bully, has already come under fire from anti-bullying groups. Activists have taken it up another notch

    These wusses are soooo going to get beat up for their lunch money as soon as I get my hands on them.

    1. Re:Keep it up... by BlackCobra43 · · Score: 1

      Aren't you afraid they'll mail you angry letters DEMANDING you give them back their money as well as the creation of a Fund for Overly Pussified Teenagers?

      --
      I never spellcheck and I freely admit it. Save your karma for more worthwhile "lol erorrs" replies
    2. Re:Keep it up... by Golias · · Score: 1

      A fund for these people? Perhaps it should be called "People United to Save Society from Inapropriate Entertainment Selections."

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

  14. Insurance by kaellinn18 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Oh, so that's why my insurance premiums are so high here in the DC area. It was Rockstar's video games all along. Silly me, I thought it was because YOU PEOPLE CAN'T FUCKING DRIVE!

    --

    --------
    This isn't the sig you're looking for. Move along.
    1. Re:Insurance by Quattro+Vezina · · Score: 1

      That and the people who designed DC can't design streets.

      Seriously, you live in the DC area, do you have any idea why the hell there are so many roundabouts there? I sure don't.

      --
      I support the Center for Consumer Freedom
    2. Re:Insurance by WidescreenFreak · · Score: 1

      I thought it was because YOU PEOPLE CAN'T FUCKING DRIVE!

      Well, the "It's Never My Fault" people probably will blame that on Grand Theft Auto and Rockstar, too, if given the chance!

      --
      The Overrated mod is for reversing inappropriate, positive mods, not for voicing disagreement with a post.
    3. Re:Insurance by kaellinn18 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Seriously, you live in the DC area, do you have any idea why the hell there are so many roundabouts there?

      Yes, actually, I do. It's a fairly neat piece of history. DC was designed purposefully so that it's very hard to get where you want to go. The architects and city planners designed it this way back in the 1700s so that it would be difficult for invading armies to invade and capture the capital. It would be tough to get a hold of the leadership if you couldn't even find them, wouldn't it? :-)

      Of course, now-a-days you can just level the entire city with a bomb, and the road system just pisses people off.

      --

      --------
      This isn't the sig you're looking for. Move along.
    4. Re:Insurance by Quattro+Vezina · · Score: 1

      Interesting. I learn something new every day...

      --
      I support the Center for Consumer Freedom
    5. Re:Insurance by dusik · · Score: 1

      I think it still counts as counter-terrorism. Everything does nowadays.

    6. Re:Insurance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Watch your tongue commie-terrist apologist!

    7. Re:Insurance by wed128 · · Score: 1

      Yea, i know...

      it's because the city-planners were really big YES fans...

    8. Re:Insurance by Qrlx · · Score: 1

      One thing I *love* about DC roads is the way they do the streetlights. They don't extend out over the roadway so you always have a nice clear view of whatever you're looking at. Definitely a good design move for tourism and sightseeing.

    9. Re:Insurance by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      I was looking for a subway station/street map (surprisingly hard to find) when I ran across a page that claimed all the streets and circles made a big free mason symbol when viewed from the air (it's a stretched hexagon running around the mall with the capital at the bottom). Many of the founders (and the architect) were masons so it makes as much sense as anything else.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    10. Re:Insurance by Tickenest · · Score: 1

      Car insurance (which I assume you're talking about) is so high in DC because there are *so many* uninsured drivers.

      I'm sure they all play Rockstar games, too. The Peaceoholics said so.

      --
      This is the NFL, which stands for "Not For Long" if you keep making those bulls*** calls.
    11. Re:Insurance by telstar · · Score: 1

      "Of course, now-a-days you can just level the entire city with a bomb, and the road system just pisses people off."
      Just don't put that into a Rockstar game, or the Peacaholics will come after you.

    12. Re:Insurance by Flunitrazepam · · Score: 1

      horses can travel up to 800 mph. they obviously didn't consider that a gas laden horse could be Hyaa!'d into the capital building by a suicidal brit with questionable moral standpoints

      --
      1) Your analysis is based on bad assumptions so your result is way off. 2) You're a sick bastard for fucking a horse.
    13. Re:Insurance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i kick ur ass and take ur wicked sig

  15. A true testament to people's stupidity by ddraigcymraeg · · Score: 2

    There are probably a billion and one things more worthy of protest than Rockstar's next game.

    1. Re:A true testament to people's stupidity by petrus4 · · Score: 1

      Yes, except they're generally things which would be advocated by the sorts of morons who are protesting this...like the war in Iraq, for instance.

  16. Gone too far by Nytewynd · · Score: 3, Insightful


    causing insurance premiums to sky rocket


    WTF? You can make arguments that Rockstar games are bad for young kids, but are we really at the point where we are blaming a game company because our insurance premiums are too high? Maybe premiums are too high because we have idiots on the road. Idiots like the people that blame game companies for insurance premiums.

    I hate when groups of "watchdogs" make demands. Who do these people think they are? They tend to make up offensive facts (OMG, the purple puppet is a flaming homo!!!) just to have something to bitch about. Or they take one quote out of context and then go on-and-on about it, twisting it until even reasonable people think it is offensive. This happens in politics all the time. I guess Rockstar got what they wanted though. As they keep pushing the envelope on what kind of ridiculous content you can fit into a game, they are going to get more and more of this.

    Part of me thinks Rockstar is trying to make money by peddling offensive ideas to kids, but that really doesn't matter. Parents should be preventing kids from buying this stuff, or face the consequences when Little Johny pummels someone in 3rd grade because Bully is his favorite game.

    I'm just waiting for a game where you can strangle a prostitute with a bungee cord, and beat up a cop with strips of bacon. That will be the funnest game ever.
    --
    /. ++
    1. Re:Gone too far by ddraigcymraeg · · Score: 1

      "Part of me thinks Rockstar is trying to make money by peddling offensive ideas to kids, but that really doesn't matter." Hmmn maybe, but I know a helluva lot of adults who love their games. These grandstanders are doing a job far better than rockstar's marketing division.

    2. Re:Gone too far by mindaktiviti · · Score: 1

      I'm just waiting for a game where you can strangle a prostitute with a bungee cord, and beat up a cop with strips of bacon. That will be the funnest game ever.

      I think Postal 2 comes close to that, although it's not as fun.

  17. Demands by durtbag · · Score: 1

    Dear Rockstar,

    We dislike the content of your games. The morality of your games clashes with the sanitized world we are trying to manufacture. Despite you being free to market whatever content you choose, we are asking you to voluntarily do the following to intentionally bankrupt yourselves:

    1.)Pull all of your current products off of store shelves, unless the store is an "adults only" smut-peddler.

    2.)Do not make or sell any more games, ever.

    3.)Reimburse parents for their lack of oversight if they have purchased a Rockstar game for their children at any time in the past.

    4.)Pay for counciling, rehab, and whatever necessary medicines a child may require in order to be de-programed of the filth your games exposed them to.

    5.)Publicly execute yourselves as a warning to others

    If you choose not to follow our voluntary guidlines, we will be forced to purchase legislation that will forward our ends. Remember, when kids play violent video games, the _________ win.

    Yours Truly,

    The Political Grandstanders of the World (PGW)

    --
    itadakimasu
  18. Re-branding by cthulhuology · · Score: 1

    Why doesn't Rockstar just rename their games to things like "Happy Pony Time" and "Hugs and Kisses Ville" that way the parents organizations would have a reason to be upset. Any idiot who buys their kids a game named after a felony, expecting wholesome family friendly fun, does not deserve to raise children. Now I think its time to take our gelding shears to these peace-nics.

    1. Re:Re-branding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm totally gonna make a beast-pron game called "Happy Pony Time." Thanks for saving me from the naming committee!

  19. I can't find the fitting words... by A+beautiful+mind · · Score: 1

    ...apart from calling them absolute universal morons, none seems quite fitting.

    It seems as if noone is concerned about facts anyway. Next week they may want to protest against the weather or that *SHOCK AND HORROR* they are teaching things about the human reproduction process in a biology class.

    --
    It takes a man to suffer ignorance and smile
    Be yourself no matter what they say
  20. Not so sure about Bully by defkkon · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I love GTA: San Andreas. I've put a lot of hours into it, and think its some great entertainment. I agree with the standard argument of "Parents should regulate what their children play, and pay attention to what comes into their household", blah blah blah. We've all heard the arguments.

    But a game about Bullying students and teachers in a fictional schoolyard? There's almost no doubt in my mind that I will purchase (and probably enjoy!) this game, but c'mon Rockstar, can you push some more buttons?

    With all the sensationalized stories about bullying in schools, children committing suicide due to being harassed, etc. do you really think its wise to make a game like this?

    I realize it'll be rated M. I know that there will be ESRB warnings around Violence, Language, etc. I also realize that this sort of stuff is great publicity for their game releases. But games like this DO give the electronic entertainment industry a bad name. Its already under fire for "Hot Coffee". Do they really need to demonize video games any more?

    And before someone says it, NO, I don't believe creative game-making should be stymied by groups such as the ones protesting Bully. I just think they should become more creative in ways OTHER than kicking the crap out of children in a schoolyard. I think that Pikmin, Katamari Damacy, Morrowind, etc. were just as creative an "out there" as GTA. But no one is coming after the industry because you killed some cartoonish Pikmin.

    1. Re:Not so sure about Bully by Chyeld · · Score: 1

      Anyone research these "anti-bullying" groups to see if they are legit? Frankly, Rockstar Games seems like a company that lives off contraversy, I wouldn't put it past some publicity company to decide the best way to get the word out was the incite a protest.

    2. Re:Not so sure about Bully by milkman_matt · · Score: 2, Interesting

      With all the sensationalized stories about bullying in schools, children committing suicide due to being harassed, etc. do you really think its wise to make a game like this?

      I think it's a great idea to make a game like this. Of course according to the reviews I checked out (below) it may bring forth even more lawsuits against rockstar. The premis is you're a kid who's picked on by bullies and teachers, you're not the bully, maybe they can lash out on their console instead of going apeshit and killing classmates. However since more schoolkids will be able to RELATE to this game, yes, it could be trouble.

      As a troublesome schoolboy, you'll laugh and cringe as you stand up to bullies, get picked on by teachers, play pranks on malicious kids, win or lose the girl, and ultimately learn to navigate the obstacles of the fictitious reform school, Bullworth Academy.

      PS: As one person said (and pointed to in their journal, games like this can be terribly fun and terribly thereputic. When I have a bad/stressful day, The Punisher is the best damned release there is ;)

    3. Re:Not so sure about Bully by strikethree · · Score: 1

      Ever heard of the First Amendment? Rockstar can make whatever kind of game they want. You are welcome to live in China if you are unhappy with the concept of freedom of speech. You want to drag this to the extreme? Ok. They can make a game where people yell fire in crowded theaters. Happy?

      strike

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
    4. Re:Not so sure about Bully by defkkon · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Ever heard of the First Amendment? Rockstar can make whatever kind of game they want. You are welcome to live in China if you are unhappy with the concept of freedom of speech. You want to drag this to the extreme? Ok. They can make a game where people yell fire in crowded theaters. Happy?

      Yeah, that's the point I was trying to make - we should ban all forms of creative expression, and the government should have full control over all industry.

      Geesh.

      Its called having a social conscience. It has nothing to do with the first ammendment. The goal of a commercial company is to do what it can to make as much money as possible. However, a company can also have a social conscience. Just because something makes you money by selling millions of copies, doesn't neccessarily mean that you should do it.

      A company can make whatever type of game they want, sure, but should they? I believe that there is a fine line. I love ultra-violent games. But when there's a social issue that is popular with extremists (ie. bullying in schools), why stir up the pot? Its just one side of the argument. I don't believe in censorship - I believe in having social conscience, and the fact that they should perhaps try and help the video game industry from looking bad.

    5. Re:Not so sure about Bully by strikethree · · Score: 1

      Bullying in schools has been around since... well, schools. Why not make a game about it? Are you thinking that such a game will increase the amount of bullying going on? Maybe such a game will reduce the amount of bullying since the bullies could see their behaviour being ostracized or maybe the "smaller" kids will feel less threatened and do something about the bullying.

      In short, I am not sure how this game relates to your concept of Social Conscience. Sure, it might be tasteless. A game about crashing planes into buildings would surely have been tasteless shortly after 11 September... but you have not proven (or even more than vaguely suggested) that this game would/could cause harm based on its content.

      Am I just not able to pay attention or did I miss something here? How does this game violate your sense of Social Conscience?

      strike

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
    6. Re:Not so sure about Bully by defkkon · · Score: 1
      Are you thinking that such a game will increase the amount of bullying going on?

      I've never once said that. Go back through all my comments - I have never once said that this game will cause more bullying. I don't think you're paying attention to my argument, since you're arguing against why this game won't increase violence in schools. That has nothing to do with my comments.

      My whole issue has nothing to do with whether this will affect kids. What I said is that it affects the image of the companies. The video game industry gets a lot of flack for its violence, drug references, sex, etc. I'm not offtended by it - I love it, makes the games more interesting - but it gives a bad impression of video games.

      Extremist groups such as the one picketing outside Rockstar's building is a perfect example. The media sensationalizes it, and all of sudden, the video game industry sounds like the root of all evil.

      This causes us (gamers) problems. Increased censorship, harder for games to get rated properly, and just general pressure from the public.

      I don't think Rockstar has a duty to prevent kids from playing their games and increasing the violence in schools - that's the parent's job - I think Rockstar has a duty to help out the industry, and maybe lay off a bit.

    7. Re:Not so sure about Bully by strikethree · · Score: 1

      Now I am certain that I am missing something...

      Why exactly should Rockstar refrain from making this game? To improve the image of the industry? How will refraining from making this game help out the industry in the long run? Why should they feel responsible for helping out the industry when you were originally talking about Social Conscience which implies doing it for society as a whole.

      Could you please restate your argument for Rockstar not making this game please?

      strike

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
    8. Re:Not so sure about Bully by westlake · · Score: 2, Insightful
      c'mon Rockstar, can you push some more buttons?

      I think this is what should be worrying every gamer. You can't help wondering what Rockstar and others have in the pipeline...when the next shoe will drop.

      I do not want the M rating to become synonymous with rape-torture-kill. I do not want sexual themes in gaming to be defined by the mysognistic gang culture of Grand Theft Auto. I do not want to see the modding community disappear because development tools, game assets, and code have been locked down tight.

      The voluntary ratings system is hanging by a thread and Rockstar continues to poison the water.

      It is time to stop blaming the parents and the politicians for the Hot Coffee fiasco and take a look at what has been happening closer to home.

    9. Re:Not so sure about Bully by philiptan · · Score: 1

      Perhaps Bully uses violence to make an interesting statement about the nature of bullying in schools. Perhaps it encourages players to consider whether the violent activities, while fun in the game, may actually be a poor course of action in real life. Perhaps the game suggests that violent retaliation is a legitimate response for a victim of bullying. We'll have to wait for the game to come out for us to assess its merits, but developers in Rockstar know the answer right now.

      The reality is that the current political climate does not make the First Amendment a sufficiently bulletproof document to fall behind in the face of proposed governmental censorship. Games like Bully could either be making important statements that the First Amendment was intended to defend, or they could just pointless tripe designed to move large numbers of SKUs. Either kind of game will spark outrage from certain outspoken politicians. If loud enough, such outrage leads to the possibility of the governmental imposition of censorship standards in the future. Games haven't managed to earn the respectability of older media, which means its future is still very much subect to the whims of senators, congressmen and judges.

      Some battles are worth fighting and some aren't. The games industry is in a position to pick its battles based on the games that it chooses to release. At this point of time, it's important to make sure that games that have violent (or sexual) content do have positive traits that would also make them defensible in the vocal-public court of opinion, so that court precedent can be set that protects the right for all kinds of games to be published in order to protect the few that use potentially objectionable material in a moral or thought-provoking manner.

      Part of this can also be helped with sufficiently stringent industry rating. I am of the opinion that adult gamers should specifically consider taking the extra effort to seek and buy AO-rated games so that publishers can see the AO rating as economically viable. But that's quite a different discussion, best saved for another thread.

    10. Re:Not so sure about Bully by strikethree · · Score: 1

      The reality is that the current political climate does not make the First Amendment a sufficiently bulletproof document to fall behind in the face of proposed governmental censorship.

      good. let's get the fight over censorship out in the open now. i am tired of the first amendment being pecked away in small amounts. let's bring the whole concept to a head right here, right now. the current political climate is bad for this kind of fight? too bad. i am all for forcing the issue one way or the other so everyone can stop sitting on their damn fenceposts trying to see which side is safer.

      strike

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
    11. Re:Not so sure about Bully by Moby+Cock · · Score: 1

      Rockstar is the video game world equivalent of Marilyn Manson, Eminem, Bill O'Reilly and Ann Coulther. They make these games because they generate controversy. That is the intent all along. That way they get amazing coverage in the media and people get a good naughty vibe when buying the game. They are not going to stop making games like this as long as the activist groups keep going bananas with every new release.

    12. Re:Not so sure about Bully by tepp · · Score: 1

      I do not want the M rating to become synonymous with rape-torture-kill. I do not want sexual themes in gaming to be defined by the mysognistic gang culture of Grand Theft Auto.

      Actually, the whole sex scene people are complaining about.... is consentual sex between CJ and his girlfriend. In order to have sex, first you must get her to like you to 50%. Yes, that's right, you must PLEASE this woman repeatedly over several dates. You must take her to restuarants she likes. You must bring her gifts. You must pick her up in a nice car. You must dress to the way she likes. You must not bore her. You must not get caught dating another woman.

      If you succeed in getting her to like you to 50%, you get the sex thing. And again, it's about pleasing her - not you. It's not rape. As the game says, "nice guys finish last!" and "failure to please a woman is a crime!" This isn't mysoginistic. It's actually - within a shallow universe - centered on pleasuring the woman.

      The end goal is to get to 100% with your girlfriend, so she will give you a special suit which has nice sex appeal stats and is rather funny. Denise -> pimp suit. Helena -> hick outfit. Kate -> cop outfit. There's a nurse outfit as well in there.

      GTA isn't about torture either.

      Just killing.

      Now, on the other hand, you have slasher horror games like Silent Hill, and The Suffering, which are more about showing torture (you don't do torture, you just round a corner and see some nightmare scene in a hospital/insane asyslum setting).

      Those aren't made by Rockstar. Silent Hill is by, I think, Konami, and The Suffering is by Surreal.

      Rockstar isn't "poisioning" the water. Their games are not about rape or torture. Just stealing and killing in various forms. After all, it is called "grand theft auto".

      --
      Tepp
    13. Re:Not so sure about Bully by defkkon · · Score: 1
      good. let's get the fight over censorship out in the open now. i am tired of the first amendment being pecked away in small amounts.

      Oh please. What are you talking about? This has nothing to do with the discussion in this thread!

      This is the last time I respond to your arguments - they're circular, and have nothing to do with the parent posts.

      Take a look at the GPP, and most posts before that. This is not a first ammendment issue - yet you keep dragging it out.

      You quoted philiptan's first sentence of a rather lengthy paragraph, which goes into detail. He is not questioning the first ammendment. He is stating that Rockstar is causing outrage which will turn into political battles. These battles can increase censorship, restrict the first ammendment, and otherwise cause a lot of problems for other creative companies.

      We are not saying that the first ammendment needs to be challenged. We are saying that Rockstar needs to be careful how often they push the envelope - it could result in increased censorship on the part of the government.

      Please, when you get into an argument, try reading and understanding the parent post. You keep trying to battle us on the first ammendment. This is not the issue at all. You simply want to have a circular argument about something that is not being questioned.

  21. Way to go, numbnuts by NanoGator · · Score: 1

    Sad thing is, I had no interest in the game Bully until I all these people were upset by it. I think their attempt to kill these games is having the opposite result.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
    1. Re:Way to go, numbnuts by Quattro+Vezina · · Score: 1

      Indeed.

      I hadn't even heard of Bully until I saw all the /. articles about these Taliban-loving maniacs protesting against it.

      I, for one, will be buying a copy of Bully the day it comes out solely to get back at these maniacs.

      --
      I support the Center for Consumer Freedom
    2. Re:Way to go, numbnuts by doofusclam · · Score: 1

      Exactly. I'm not too fond of Rockstar lately, what with their trying to pass the 'blame' for the hot coffee mod onto people who discovered it ON THE DISC, and Bully does seem an awfully cynical way to get more schoolkids beaten up while making cash, but this is absolutely golden PR for them. Watch those sales fly!

    3. Re:Way to go, numbnuts by snorklewacker · · Score: 1

      > Exactly. I'm not too fond of Rockstar lately, what with their trying to pass the 'blame' for the hot coffee mod onto people who discovered it ON THE DISC

      The mod adds naked textures. The original mini-game had all participants fully clothed. How salacious.

      Rockstar needs to take out a few libel suits.

      --
      I am no longer wasting my time with slashdot
  22. Damnit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someone has to tell me when these guys are protesting so I can pester them.

  23. I'd be happy if... by cornface · · Score: 0

    I'd be happy if Rockstar would just release a game with controls that don't suck.

    The GTA games are cool in so many ways, but every time I play I have flashbacks to the Army Men series. The controls are very similar: Slow, mushy, and inaccurate. My favorite is when you're getting killed and get overzealous on the turning stick and suddenly find yourself crouching helplessly in a hail of bullets.

    Manhunt was even worse and didn't even have the benefit of being a fun game. Good lord, did Manhunt suck. "Hey, look at me! I'm standing out in the open in plain sight, but there's a tiny shadow covering my forearm, so I'm invisible!"

  24. Who ARE these people?? by Z0mb1eman · · Score: 1

    No, really... this HAS to be a joke.

    > Let parents return Grand Theft Auto for a full refund until they do a national awareness campaign to educate parents of content and possible effects

    *boggle*

    Do they also want Rockstar to pay for a national education campaign to teach reading to all the illiterate parents who apparently can't read "violent content", "sexual content" and such on the box? And possibly hire some security guards in all the stores selling their products to tackle any parent who tries to buy a copy without reading the box, and twist their arm, slap them around, or torture them in any way, shape or form until they do read the box?

    > Create a fund for victims of unauthorized use of a motor vehicle and car-jackings, etc,

    Because, clearly, there has been such a huge spike in those crimes after GTA was released... my god, the people at Rockstar must be gods, with the power to affect our minds and control our actions!

    > Make a national apology for misleading and lying to children, parents, and legislators about their intentions

    "We're sorry we lied to you and said our game is very violent and contains sexual content. Oh wait, we said the truth! Nevermind."

    >and causing insurance premiums to sky rocket

    Okay, when I got to this one I just lost it. Causing WHAT insurance premiums to sky rocket?? Medical insurance for carpal tunnel? Eye insurance for staring at a computer/TV screen for too long?

    > Give a written response within five business days of receipt of these demands ...or we will BLOW UP THE EARTH!!! Mwuahahaha!

    Seriously... who the hell ARE these people??

    --
    ClutterMe.com - easiest site creation on the Net. Just click and type.
    1. Re:Who ARE these people?? by GeneralHorel · · Score: 1

      Seriously... who the hell ARE these people??

      These people are the ones with too much time on thier hands. My solution: make people get a licence to raise kids. If you have the IQ of a walnut or lower or you want some one else to take teach your kids good moral judgment and no let them have access to conten that you find offencive then you have to leave various body parts at the door

      --
      Slashdot sigs contain more useful information than the articals
  25. Anyone have stats on carjacking rates since GTA3? by ToastyKen · · Score: 1

    We all know the stats on how violent crime and violent crime among children/teens have gone down since Doom was released.

    Does anyone have any stats on what actual carjacking rates have been since GTA3 was released?

  26. My Own List by Hayte · · Score: 1

    While we're on the subject. To MLB, Please don't play anymore games under any circumstances. Volunteer to move all MLB games to Pay-per-view so I don't have to watch them. Let me have a full refund to any baseball game I went to. Create a fund for victims of baseball bat related crime or any crime related to thrown objects. Make a national apology for misleading and lying to children, parents, and now legislators about their steriod use. Give a Written response within 5 days of recipt of these demands.

  27. Heh by NanoGator · · Score: 2, Funny

    "...do a national awareness campaign to educate parents of content and possible effects..."

    Possible effects include:

    - Bitchiness
    - Irritability
    - Overreactions
    - ... attending protests and making unreasonable demands

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  28. Passion of the Rockstar by antifood · · Score: 1

    I find it utterly fascinating that the same people that flock to see "The Passion of the Christ" will picket a videogame. I mean we are talking about an extremely violent movie, a movie that people have died watching. Bring children to an excessively violent religious themed movie? No problem. Rockstar video games? Burn them at the stake. I am sincerely stunned at the hypocritical justifications folks make. If parents feel that certain tones of violence are OK due to religious themes, thats fine, thats great. Perhaps other parents deem unrealistic pixels to be more suitable forms of visual stimuli than live action massacres. Just a thought.

  29. I'll give you three guesses by BlackCobra43 · · Score: 1

    Hint : It didn't go up.

    --
    I never spellcheck and I freely admit it. Save your karma for more worthwhile "lol erorrs" replies
    1. Re:I'll give you three guesses by ToastyKen · · Score: 1

      Um, and where's your link to numbers? Saying something don't make it so. :P

  30. Please tell me no one is that, um, silly. by RogueLeaderX · · Score: 1

    Giving this protest group the benefit of the doubt considering the ridiculous demands they are making I have come up with an alternate theory: Peacoholics is actually a group funded by Rockstar to generate press about their games via protest. I imagine that funding a volunteer organization is much cheaper than bying advertisement in all the major gaming mags and websites. And not only is this method cheaper, but it reaches a wider audience! Ingenious, way to go Rockstar. They should patent the idea and sell it to EA. EA could fund a protest group of disgruntled NFL fans to protest 'Football Simulater xx23 - with even better graphics!' Wait, I'll patent the idea and sell it to EA. None of ya'll tell anyone, ok?

  31. Hehe by AkaXakA · · Score: 1

    Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah!

    *snigger*

    Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahah hah hahahahaha ha hahahah hah hahah ahahahahahahaha!

    *falls off couch*

    Hahahahahaihhihihihiahahahahaahahooooohahahahahaha !

    *pinks away a tear*

    Rockstars responce: "Thanks for the free publicity!"

  32. How about by Fr05t · · Score: 1

    Rockstar gives a refund to the parents of 17 year olds since Rockstar already advised them this was a game for 17+. Then inform the misguided protesters that the bullies in the new game are actually the bad guys, not the character the player plays.

    I'd also suggest going one step further and hiring real bullies to beat up all the protesters, and steal their lunch money - but that's just me.

  33. Here's why the protest is unreasonable by dstone · · Score: 2, Insightful

    In their demands, the protesters refer to Bully, a game that's currently under development, and demand Rockstar to:

    "Not to release Bully under any circumstances "

    The "under any circumstances" part is where they stop being reasonable and rational (and where I stop listening). Essentially, they're saying that they're going to protest any game called "Bully" that Rockstar releases, even if the content was radically edited, sanitized, censored, etc.

    This makes it clear that the protesters are not actually interested in improving or sanitizing game content, but that they're simply out for revenge against Rockstar, even if Rockstar was willing to compromise or negotiate.

    1. Re:Here's why the protest is unreasonable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Notice of compliance: Bully has been renamed to School Bully.

    2. Re:Here's why the protest is unreasonable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This makes it clear that the protesters are not actually interested in improving or sanitizing game content, but that they're simply out for revenge against Rockstar, even if Rockstar was willing to compromise or negotiate.

      Well, you can't really blame them - they are simply copycating their country's president's (lack of) line of reasoning, after all.

  34. These protesters deserve to be bombed... by lightspawn · · Score: 1

    Let's figure out a couple of good phrases to googlebomb 'Peaceoholics' and 'Jack Thompson'.

  35. Time to invest in adult book stores by PapaBoojum · · Score: 1

    Volunteer to sell its violent and sexually explicit games in adult video stores only

    Soooo... lemmee see if I understand this... this group is demanding Rockstar do something that will result in millions of teens - mostly male - flocking to adult video stores?

    Can you say 'impulse buy'? I ~knew~ you could.

    Give a written response within five business days of receipt of these demands

    How about a live one-finger response?

  36. Re:Anyone have stats on carjacking rates since GTA by VoidWraith · · Score: 1

    Remember though, that correlation is not causation. Even though carjacking and violent crime among minors has decreased, you can't use a statistic to say that games had anything to do with it. Statistics don't work like that.

    However, you can say that statistically, it is probable that certain games had a negative impact (in terms of numbers) on violent crime among minors and carjacking.

  37. Boycot the boycot! by supersocialist · · Score: 1

    I'm going to buy Bully the day it comes out, and pick up Manhunt(er?) next time I'm at the store. I'm giving serious thought to picking up an AO copy of San Andreas just for posterity and to boost their stats.

    For every jerk out there protesting, somebody ought to pick up an extra Rockstar game and show those fools what gamers are made of. We have expendable income! We're jaded and materialistic! We want the old ultraviolence and we want it now!

  38. Shouldn't they feel stupid! by Otaku-Man23 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    For this event, I have prepared a song about the Peaceaholics and their efforts:

    *I Feel Pretty begins to play*

    I FEEL STUPID!... OH SO STUPID!... I FEEL STUPID, RETARDED, AND DUUUUUUUMB!

    I WISH CUPID... DIDN'T TRY... TO GO GET ME... CONCEEEEEEEEEEIVED!

    *lalalalala la la la LA LA*

    WE ARE MORONS!... SUCH BIG MORONS!... THERE'S NO SHOW ON... WITH MORONS... LIKE WEEEEEE!

    SO WE GO ON... AND MAKE STINKS... ON NATIONAL... TEEEVEEEEEEEE!

    *lalalalala LA LA LA*

    SEE THAT STUPID GUY IN THE TV THERE!
    WHO COULD THAT DUMB IDIOT BEEEEEEEEEEE?
    SUCH A STUPID FACE! SUCH A STUPID SMILE! SUCH A STUPID SIGN! SUCH A STUPID WEEEEEEEEEEE!

    *such a stupid we! such a stupid we!*

    I HATE ROCKSTAR!... THAT DAMN ROCKSTAR!... THEY THINK WE ARE... MUCH DUMB-"AR"... THAN THEEEEEEEY!

    FOR THEY MAAAAAAAKE... MY KIDS GO AND... DOOOOO STUPID THIIIIIIIIIIIIINGS!

    *music turns evil sounding*

    HAVE YOU SEEN THESE OUTLANDISH NEWSCASTS!?... THEY MAKE US SEEM EVIL AS SIN!

    BUT I KNOW THAT ONCE OUR GAME'S RELEASED... IT WILL SELL LIKE HOTCAKES AND THEN WE'LL SURELY WIN!

    THOSE PEOPLE ARE DUMB! THEY ARE SO CONTRIVED *lalala*
    THEY DO NOT KNOW THIS... PUBLICITY'S FIIIIIIIINE!

    BUT WHY DO THEY SEEK... TO SHOW US LIKE FREAKS?! *lalala*
    FOR WE ARE JUST GEEKS... WHO LIKE TO PLAY GAAAAAAAMES!

    STAY AWAY FROM US... PEACEAHOLICS!... YOU MAKE ALL OF US... CATATONIC!

    HONEST AND SURE... THAT THEY'LL HAVE US FINED! *lalala*
    I GUESS THEY DON'T KNOW... THEY'RE OUT OF THEIR MIIIIIIIIIIIINDS!

    *lalalalala LA LA LA*

    WE FEEL STUPID!... OH SO STUPID!... THAT WE THINK THAT... THAT ROCKSTAR... SHOULD BUUUUUURRRN!

    A COMMITTEEEEEE... SHOULD BE FORMED... TO GO AND SLAN... -DER THEEEEEEMMMMM!

    *lalalalala LA LA LA*

    SEE THAT EVIL GUY, THAT JACK THOMPSON THERE!? *Jack Thompson! Where?*
    WHO COULD THAT SINISTER GUY GO SUUUUEEE? *Huh? Rockstar?*
    SUCH AN EVIL GUY! SUCH AN EVIL CASE! SUCH AN EVIL GRIN! SUCH AN EVIL DWEEEEEEEEB!

    *such and evil dweeb! such an evil dweeb!*

    I FEEL STUPID... OH SO STUPID... WE GOT SO FAR... AND ROCKSTAR... HAS WOOOOOOOOOON!

    CAUSE' WE LOOOOOST... IN THE STUPID... LAW APPEALS COOOOOUUUUUURT!

    ~Otaku-Man

  39. Game stargeted at adults. by raptorjb007 · · Score: 1

    When are people going to realize video gamea are not just a medium of entertainment reserved only for young children anymore. The original gamer kids have all but grown up, and so needs to the gaming industry. We are now mature gamers, and we can handle games targeted at a mature audiance. Grand theft auto is just one example of a game not suited for young kids, but some parents just are to ignorant to realize that their are adult rated video games. There is a reason the ESRB rated games, and that is because their is a wide range of content ranging from pre-kindergarden to pure adult. This kind of thing does not go on with movies, people understand what a R rating, or X rating means, why won't these same parents realize what the hell an M or 17+ rating means. Three words for you people, GET A CLUE! Adult games are for adults not kids, if you don;t weant them to play them, DO NOT BUY THEM, pay attention, and stop blaming others for your failings.

  40. Rockstar fanning the flames by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They will probably have a sequence called "Cold Kool-aid" about a sex scene with a teacher and an underage student.

    Oh wait that was real life too.

  41. You're Right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    ...you aren't sure about Bully.

    But a game about Bullying students and teachers in a fictional schoolyard? There's almost no doubt in my mind that I will purchase (and probably enjoy!) this game, but c'mon Rockstar, can you push some more buttons?

    If you read this article, you would realize that Bully is not what you claim it to be. As a matter of fact, it's a game that pits you, the average student, in a situation where you attempt to OVERCOME being bullied.

    Sorry for being the jerk here; however, I think it's problematic when you decide to say: I agree with the standard argument of "Parents should regulate what their children play, and pay attention to what comes into their household", THEN proceed to go on a diatribe against R* because they are demonizing video games (again, your words, paraphrased)...

    ...when you don't even know what the game is about.

    1. Re:You're Right... by defkkon · · Score: 2, Interesting
      As a matter of fact, it's a game that pits you, the average student, in a situation where you attempt to OVERCOME being bullied ... ...when you don't even know what the game is about.

      You are correct, in the game you are the one being bullied.

      But the point of the games is to fight back against students that bully you, and teachers that harass you. You perpetuate violence against these bulles - both students and teachers.

      I don't claim to know everything about the game, but I do know the general idea. I hate to bring this up, its often used as a scapegoat analogy, but do you remember Columbine? These were not bulles, these were people being bullied. The violence against the teachers and students is similar to what is being promoted in this game.

      As I said before, I will most likely play this game. I will also probably enjoy it. But the fact is, Rockstar is using a socially-controversial topic to create their game. I think its hilarious, but I'm also aware that this helps give the video game industry a bad rap. Thus, my statement about the demonization of video games. Which, I stand by.

    2. Re:You're Right... by LuckyPossum · · Score: 1

      The main problem is the perception of videogames. People still look at it as something targeted at children, which isn't true anymore.

  42. No such thing as bad press by vga_init · · Score: 1
    What incentive does Rockstar have to do anything other than just ignore the protesters? I didn't even know such a title was in the works, but, thanks to the protesting, now I'm aware of the game. I have to admit, it doesn't seem like the kind of game that really sparks my interest, but I gave Rockstar kudos for originality; I've never heard of a game like this before.

    So, what to do? Ignore the protesters, let them advertise for you, and if CERTAIN countries ban the release/sale of the game (the United States certainly won't, and it's really hard to care about the UK), EVEN BETTER. When a game is designed to be controversial, isn't it a marketing golden opportunity to be bale to say "so [blank] that it's banned in some countries."

    It may prevent the game from being very widely sold, but I do not believe that this game is really going to be top on anyone's list, so perhaps the controversy is good in helping it establish its niche.

  43. Re:Anyone have stats on carjacking rates since GTA by bigalsenior · · Score: 0

    lies ,damn lies , and statistics

  44. Can begin to describe the irony.. by hopopee · · Score: 1

    Of people these "peaceholics" trying to bully them into not releasing a game called "Bully". On another note, these kind of people make me sad. I t's just stupid that they get all riled up over a goddamn game. There are bigger things wrong in this life ffs. How many deaths are accountable by games? How about the "war on terrorism" and the one basically still going on in Iraq? Which one detoriates "traditional" moral values of upstanding citizens, teaching them that it's perfectly OK to kill _real_ people or giving people a chance to immerse themselves in a role of a bully, seeing some unrealistic pixel sex or giving them a chance to shoot some polygons that represent a cop. It's strange, on their logic these games should be making people more aggressive and violent. I've played games since I was like six years old, and I don't remember ever hitting someone on purpose or even when I got really pissed off the last time. Right about now someone will say that one evil doesn't counter another. Well, I don't even think violence in games is a bad thing. The sex on the other hand.. Laughable. I'd rather watch porn, it's more realistic ;)

  45. 5 bucks says. . . by Bastian · · Score: 1

    . . .most of the children who play this will be the ones getting bullied.

  46. Bully? by Winterblink · · Score: 1

    I didn't even know about this game before these idiots started protesting it. Suddenly I found myself at Gamespot checking it out, sounds kinda fun. Can't wait.

    Thanks, Peaceaholics!

    --
    "I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar."
    -Hoban Washburn
  47. I don't get it... by Ghost429 · · Score: 1
    --
    I already know i'm going to hell, now i'm just trying to get cable down there.
    1. Re:I don't get it... by cornface · · Score: 0

      I don't get your post. Are you being sarcastic? I'm assuming you're not because you included non-violent games like Katamari and Paper Mario.

      The rest of your list:

      World of Warcraft -- chopping people with swords.

      Golden Sun -- From looking at the screens, more sword chopping.

      Fire Emblem -- Battle game. Battles are violent by their very nature.

      Star Wars -- Hacking with swords. The "Wars" part should be a tip off.

      Halo 2 -- First person shooter. You don't shoot people with fluffy bunnies, in the game. I guess maybe you haven't played it?

      Super Smash Bros. -- Fighting game. Fighting generally is uh...violent.

      The only thing I can figure is that you were aiming for sarcasm and count smashing citizens with your giant Katamari to be violent. Or not.

    2. Re:I don't get it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah... looks more like a desperately pissed i-put-my-brain-into-your-head personality that doesn't play games or own a game system or anything like that.

  48. NEWSFLASH! Bully ISN'T about bullying people! by HatofPig · · Score: 0

    It's about getting back at all the bullies and evil teachers at a corrupt boarding school.

    --
    Silicon & Charybdis McLuhan Kildall Papert Kay
  49. I am certianly glad.. by Lemental · · Score: 1

    Stupidity isnt contaigous. These people would be so infected with the disease, they would have to be quarantined.

  50. My feelings by Conspiracy_Of_Doves · · Score: 1

    I respect Rockstar's right to make any game they want. After all, this is America and everyone has the right to say what they want or create any work they want, regardless of how I or anyone else feels about its content.

    I also have to say that I am completly disgusted with Rockstar for making a game that glorifies bullying regardless of whether it causes anyone who plays it to start bullying. I don't believe that GTA had much of an effect on people who played it, but lets face it, bullying is a far more accessable activity to the average grade-schooler than carjacking and cop-killing. I would very much like to see somebody, preferably Rockstar, make a game where you fight against bullies.

    Rockstar has its freedom of speech and so do I.

    1. Re:My feelings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why don't you RTFA, numbnuts? Your freedom of speech point is good but you spoil it by not knowing what the game is actually about...

    2. Re:My feelings by iainl · · Score: 1

      What makes you think it glorifies bullying? So far all we know is the following:

      1) Here in the UK (where we have a relatively sensible board of classification) they're aiming for an 18 certificate, so it will be illegal to sell to minors anyway.

      2) Your player is the one being bullied, not the bully; your job is to stand up to them by embarking on a series of Spy Vs. Spy style missions to defeat them in increasingly elaborate measures.

      3) They are going for the standard DMA level of OTT satire and approximately zero seriousness.

      4) All in all, it's looking not so much a menace to society, but a game of Dennis The Menace.

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
  51. Little Jimmy invites his friend Billy over... by Allison+Geode · · Score: 4, Funny

    Jimmy: Hey, billy, want to come over and play Grand Theft Auto?
    Billy: I'd love to, but mom said I couldn't play violent video games anymore, and she's even out protesting at Rockstar headquarters!
    Jimmy: Yeah, my mom is protesting, too, which means we'll have all afternoon un-attended to do whatever the hell we want!
    Billy: AWESOME! Should I bring my dad's Playboy and my brother's marijuana, too?

  52. Liars should not talk about right and wrong. by CashCarSTAR · · Score: 1

    What's that they say about stones and glass houses? The culture of relative truth and the REAL "if it feels good do it" culture (Don't think hippie. Think yuppie, I.E. Soccer Mom), are behind most of the problems. These people are liars. Plain and simple. It took me two minutes to realize that in "Bully", you do NOT play the Bully. You play a character who is bullied, and your goal is to rise up the social structure of your school. You play the average joe who overcomes the bully. And where exactly is the problem with this? These people are liars. They're trying to make you focus on THIS "immorality", while their greed, ego and selfishness runs rampant and destroys a nation. Don't let them. BTW. The irony of the situation is that it's the culture that's the problem that makes bullying a problem in the first place. The "up or out" culture where you either win or lose, and everything comes down to that is what kills any sort of cooperative atmosphere anyway. All I'll say is thank god for video games, especially on-line games that are starting to teach kids how to work together towards a common goal. The kids really are all right...no thanks to these people.

  53. Financial Suicide for Rockstar by tepp · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Let parents return Grand Theft Auto for a full refund until they do a national awareness campaign to educate parents of content and possible effects

    Gahhhh.

    This stuff is giving me heart-burn, I tell you.

    If Rockstar were to do that, it would be financial suicide. There are millions of units of GTA:SA sold right now. And there a millions of people who have finished - the PS2 version at least - the game. Most of these people sell their games back to ebgames at a loss. But if Rockstar were to offer a refund, it wouldn't be JUST the parents who would return the game for money... it would be every cheap college student who could use 50$, despite the fact they have no objections to the game. It would be morally wrong, but when you're in college and living off of ramen and cheep beer, you don't care.

    Literally, it would provide a free game to millions of people, where they would play it, then return it for a full refund. Financial suicide for Rockstar!

    These people need to have "I am stupid" tattooed on their forehead. The game already has a list of all that's wrong with it, including Explicit Sexual Content as one of the items. How much more explicit can you get than listing it straight on the box next to the big "M for Mature" logo?

    --
    Tepp
    1. Re:Financial Suicide for Rockstar by Snowmit · · Score: 1

      Wait, let's read that sentence even more carefully... ..until they do a national awareness campaign...

      First they say the want to prevent people from buying the game, then the want to force a mandatory Ad Campaign? Well done, idiots.

      --
      I have a lot of opinions about Cyborgs and Architects
    2. Re:Financial Suicide for Rockstar by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 1

      These people need to have "I am stupid" tattooed on their forehead.

      I disagree completely!!

      These people need to have "diputs ma I" tattooed on their foreheads.

      I mean, WE already know their stupid.

      --
      Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
  54. wow... by ljaguar · · Score: 1

    you just can't buy that kind of publicity.

  55. So... by jpmkm · · Score: 1

    These guys are addicted to peaceohol? Either that or alcoholics are addicted to alc. I don't know.

  56. Dust of and nuke the US from orbit by Tom · · Score: 1

    That and the Bush Pro-ID statement close the case for me. The US is a lost case, I suggest we're smarter than the marines and just nuke it out.

    Damn. How do you live with so many damn fucking stupid morons all around you? I pity every american with an IQ above 10. You must be in constant pain just thinking about it.

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    1. Re:Dust of and nuke the US from orbit by mog007 · · Score: 1

      I just stay as far away from anybody I don't know. It's kind of lonely, and I never get laid, but at least I can walk around without putting my violent video game skills to the test.

  57. Amazon's Description by myheroBobHope · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Welcome to the fictional Bullworth Academy where you play a troubled schoolboy named Jimmy in reform school who tries to stand up to bullies, gets picked on by teachers, plays pranks on annoying kids from all over campus, and even tries to pursue a love interest.

    Sounds really bad for kids... almost like REAL school. Which isn't dangerous at all, that's why they have metal detectors.

    --
    http://www.pterrys.com
  58. goodwill by rayde · · Score: 2, Insightful
    the mood of the comments here is obviously on the side of Rockstar, and I tend to agree with some of them, as I do value freedom to choose what games I can play.

    however, I believe it would be a nice gesture of goodwill for Rockstar to do something along the lines of the one demand, "Create a fund for victims of unauthorized use of a motor vehicle and car-jackings, etc". they could give something beneficial to those affected by such tragedy, instead of simply glorifying the perpetrators through their games.

    I don't think it's gonna happen though.

  59. OMG they must be stopped!!! by dtfinch · · Score: 1

    They're exercising their freedom of expression, and I don't like what they have to say! We just can't let this go on any further! We must protest, lobby, and sue until Rockstar is silenced!!!

  60. Re:Anyone have stats on carjacking rates since GTA by British · · Score: 1

    We all know the stats on how violent crime and violent crime among children/teens have gone down since Doom was released.

    Hey c'mon that's not anything to joke about. My cousin was killed last week in Detroit by a flaming-skull shooting hell demon.

  61. Really? by Popageorgio · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Anti-bullying groups? Seriously? So we solved that world hunger thing?

  62. Peaceoholics Did Right by Shihar · · Score: 1

    I don't know about anyone else, but I think Peaceoholics is doing a good thing by spreading awareness. Before they started their campaign I did not know that Rockstar was going to produce a game about being a bully. The list of perversions in this game was completely unknown to me. Now, as a informed consumer I really can't wait to buy this game. Kick ass Peaceoholics, spread the word!

    Wonder if they have a list of games somewhere with that lists the best violent video games out there...

  63. ignoring the truth by crisifix · · Score: 1

    The inspiration for this brilliant and comprehensive game is the things that are wrong in society today. Rockstar wouldn't have made a game about car-jacking if there wasn't such thing as car-jacking, as well as, prostitution, murder, etc. I believe Rockstar realises these acts are wrong. That's why they incorporated these acts into a game (it's a medium where it's not wrong). Perhaps these "peacaholics" should take a more proactive stance and try to combat the core of these problems, instead of ignoring them.

  64. Re:Anyone have stats on carjacking rates since GTA by stungod · · Score: 1

    Yeah, my bad. Sorry about that.

    After playing Doom, I decided to become a physicist so that I could unlock the secrets of interdimensional travel.

    If it weren't for my playing Myst, I would never have had the foresight to keep my D'ni linking book handy when the demons came through.

    Unfortunately, I linked to some Bizzaro-Earth where killing and car theft are OK but having sex is VERY bad. I wish I could go back...at least hell demons behave rationally.

  65. Rockstar is Lucky by DavidD_CA · · Score: 1

    Right now there is a marketing guy at Rockstar laughing his ass off.

    Why?

    Because he just got his company national press and awareness for their new game, for free.

    At worst, this will deter a very few number of sales as parents decide not to buy it for their 12 year old.

    At best, a few extra thousand young/mid adults now know about the game and are more likely to become customers.

    --
    -David
  66. Do you think... by activesynapsis · · Score: 1

    All the protesters are lined up on the sidewalk? I could grab a car and mow them down for a grand amount of points! I learned this from playing Fantavision.

    And back in the 80's I used to dress in overalls and a fake moustache and kick turtles all day as well.

    1. Re:Do you think... by mink · · Score: 1

      Fantavision? Thats the one where I learned to attaching things to rockets and blow them up real good with my laser.

      Sounds more like you have been playing Carmageddon.

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
  67. Why is it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    ..when a bunch of folks start protesting against every policy by the current Administration, or by any Republican at all, the media and many here hail them as heroes for using peaceful means to expedite change.

    But some concerned citizens use exactly the same methods to right what they perceive as evil, they're automatically labelled as fools, and treated as obstructionists.

    Way I see it, this is how such things *should* be done. Just like a boycott-grass roots *action* from the people, not repressive laws and suits from lawyers.

    Just like the activities against games labelled as "racist". Vote with your wallet, and gvie your opinion voice-don't pervert the laws and make the government enforce morality.

    whatever happened to "I may disagree with what you say, but I'll fight to the death to defend your right to say it"? Are protests only allowed if they're anti-establishment, anti government, anti-christian or anti-Republican?

    1. Re:Why is it... by Dehumanizer · · Score: 1

      Actually, if you're anti-establishment, anti-government, anti-christian or anti-republican, you are branded "unpatriotic" and someone who is "helping the terrorists".

      --
      The Tlog - a technology blog
  68. Haha by Lally+Singh · · Score: 1

    Wait until we see the super-secret cheat code that unlocks the 'S&M' room in Bully.

    --
    Care about electronic freedom? Consider donating to the EFF!
  69. The whole thing is out of proportion by Chosen+Reject · · Score: 1

    Let's get one thing straight. Rockstar did something (with the help of a modder) that got a lot of attention. And now everyone is jumping on the band wagon looking for some attention related to it. Rockstar is happy because it is free PR, but it's the same with these crazy protesters. It's free publicity for them as well. The politicians are doing it, the protesters are doing it, Rockstar is doing it, news sites are doing it, /. is doing it. It's all publicity for free. Every one of them knows that this whole thing is something that will get people to talk. Can we please never hear of this again?

    --
    Stop Global Warming!
    Just say no to irreversible processes!
  70. Rockstar increases insurace claims? by CerealKiller66 · · Score: 1

    Hmm.... So the Bully advertisment will begin with these words on the screen... BLOOD SEX VIOLENCE ... but that's not the best news.... We just saved a lot of money on our car insurance. Buy your copy of Bully today.. This message brought to you by Gieko.

  71. LOL by AvitarX · · Score: 1

    They are blaming Rockstor for high insurance premiums????? Thats the funniest thing ever.

    PS, does sending out millions of things saying your games are violent contain sexual stuff ect. count as awarenss campaign? because they right it on every box.

    --
    Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
  72. Ironic? by myheroBobHope · · Score: 1

    Their website drives me towards violence. It's such bad, bad flash... and no text version available...

    --
    http://www.pterrys.com
  73. Videogames are not always a child's medium by Chimp_On_Stilts · · Score: 1

    I think the people so hotly protesting Rockstar are missing a very important point.

    Videogames are not universally meant for children.

    In fact, as the people who were the first to really get into videogames grow, the maturity level of the games themselves seems to be growing, too.

    These protestors seem to think that any and all videogames are intended to end up in the hands of children. I believe they would protest ANY game not suitable for a young child; GTA is just unlucky (lucky? - free press) enough to be the current scapegoat.

    Why is it difficult to realize that these violent games are not intended for youth any more than rated R movies?

  74. Think of the convenence by glowimperial · · Score: 1

    Volunteer to sell its violent and sexually explicit games in adult video stores only

    If I could buy my porn and my video games in one quick trip, I'd save money on gas and have more time to play Bully when it comes out!

  75. Best..Advertising..EVAR! by fuzzybunny · · Score: 1

    I haven't bought a game since HL2 and BF2 came out, and then not since BF1942 was released (whoa!).

    That said, I might just pick up a copy of GTA-whatever-the-latest-version-is JUST OUT OF FUCKING SPITE.

    Jesus, people, not that they're going to be the one reading this, but if you don't like it, DON'T BUY IT.

    --
    Cole's Law: Thinly sliced cabbage
  76. Wish I were in NY right now by mobby_6kl · · Score: 1

    or at least in the US, so I could walk up to these activists/protestors and tell them loudly and proudly, "FUCK YOU!"*

    I'm glad they're not sitting on their fat retarded asses but actually doing somethig about stuff they don't like, however they have no fucking clue what they're talking about and their demands make about as much sense as Beowulf having sex with Robert Fulton at the first battle of Antietam.**

      Bully isn't gloryfing bullying, but shows a kid who actually "stands up to bullies, gets picked on by teachers, plays pranks on malicious kids, wins or loses the girl, and ultimately learns to navigate the obstacles of the fictitious reform school." I even think some anti-bullying people actually like the idea, but I don't have any quotes, sorry. This one is from Rockstar's description, can be found for example here

    Originally I wanted to go through the demands, but the article already does that with much less anger, insults and profanity than anything I could write now. Have a nice day.

    * - Rockstar's official response? please?
    ** - Dennis Miller in Famili Guy

  77. Stupid group name (We need Peaceohol) by M3wThr33 · · Score: 1

    Peaceoholics crave Peaceohol.
    Why?
    Alcoholics crave alcohol.

    What is Peaceohol?

    1. Re:Stupid group name (We need Peaceohol) by sesshomaru · · Score: 1
      Peaceoholics crave Peaceohol.
      Why?
      Alcoholics crave alcohol.

      What is Peaceohol?

      [Chief Wiggum takes the bottle from Lou's hand and dabs his finger with it, giving it a taste]
      Wiggum: My God, it's nothing but carrots and peyote.
      Eddie: Damn longhairs never learn, Chief.
      Wiggum: Eh, it's time for an old-fashioned hippie ass-whomping!
      --
      "MIT betrayed all of its basic principles."
  78. Well, it's simple... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...I play violent videogames that let me kill random people on the street so I don't do it in real life.

  79. Awareness Campaign by SixArmedJesus · · Score: 1

    until they do a national awareness campaign to educate parents of content

    Oh, you mean they're going to start teaching people to read again? Good. If they hadn't slacked on that in the first place, people would have realized that the name of the game was GRAND THEFT AUTO and not "Babysitter."

    --

    *slight crashing sound*
  80. In later news... by Crutonman · · Score: 1

    A group of slashdotters and prochoice gamers have gathered outside the homes of the peaceaholics gathering outside rockstar during the day.

    The slashdotter/avid gamer group requested a list of demands be read.

    1. Stop putting your filth in our newspapers, your taking up space of actual news with your dictator like demands.

    2. Remove yourself for the sake of the world's gene pool, the sooner your gone the better we are.

  81. Columbine? by tepples · · Score: 1

    Didn't happen with Doom.

    Columbine?

    1. Re:Columbine? by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      Nope. The article you linked to alludes to this, but that dude's journal is a little more telling. His references to Doom were illustrations of how he wanted them to play out. It wasn't an attempt to recreate something he found glorious in the game.

      Keeping Doom out of his hands would not have averted that tragedy. Nor would it have helped with the pyschological and social problems he was already having.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
  82. Virtual reality more important that reality by Neo-Rio-101 · · Score: 1

    The irony is that these groups complain out loudly that games will affect kids when in fact they seem to be more affected by the virtual world than anyone else.

    --
    READY.
    PRINT ""+-0
  83. quote from Mr. Moten by daspriest · · Score: 1

    "...It's alright to whup a woman, it's alright to steal a car, it's alright to mess with a prostitute, it's alright to curse and to use drugs." ~Mr. Ronald Moten

  84. Responsible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This might have been mentioned already, but meh I'm too lazy to read everybody's comments - just like I'm too lazy to sign in.

    Perhaps these parents should question, how their children are purchasing games rated for adults? and why they are buying their children adult rated games?

    Games (and all video content) have ratings for a reason. If I 7 year old is playing an 18/Adult rated game then the question is asked why? Are they playing their older brother's (or sister's) game, in which case the parents should prevent this. Has someone bought it for them, parents, grandparents, aunt, uncle etc - better protest around uncle bob's house then.

    The problem isn't the people churning out the games, the problem is with people's lack of ability to accept responsibility for things.

    How can a parent claim they didn't know what they were buying when their child asks them for the latest GTA game? Its right on the cover telling them its for over 18's only, so obviously little billy should be playing it.

    You bought it, live with it, stop complaining and get on with your lives. If you don't want your child playing games like that - don't buy them, get your childs friends parents not to buy them either, but if those of us who are old enough and sensible enough to go and play a game like that want to, then we should do. Oh and by sensible I mean we won't try to run someone over thinking that an ambulance will come along and by some act of God they get up and start on their merry way again - it just doesn't happen like that. // rant over

  85. Reality Check? by kenp2002 · · Score: 1

    Don't like it? Don't play it. Now STFU and get back to work you liberal hippiee. If you spent less time protesting and more time parenting you would have to worry so much.

    --
    -=[ Who Is John Galt? ]=-
  86. I can't think for my self. by SWATJester · · Score: 1

    Quick! Someone hurry up and censor everything! I can't be trusted to make my own decisions about what I deem to be suitable content for myself and my children! OBVIOUSLY I need the government, special-interest groups, and Jack Thompson to tell me what is acceptable content. You know, my mother stopped feeding and dressing me a LONG time ago....apparently some people still have a womb complex.

  87. Because It's Bad For Business by robbway · · Score: 1

    If I had a company and had a globally-announced product that was edgy and bound to sell millions of copies, why would I even consider the Peaceaholics demands? The demands are very nearly extortion--give up millions of dollars or what? The demands are unrealistic and just plain silly when considered in the appropriately business context.

  88. Here's what I wrote. by ALeavitt · · Score: 1

    I am writing in regards to your protest outside Rockstar's offices. I am a responsible adult, and I enjoy Rockstar's games. I have grown up with video games, and even played violent games when I was at an "impressionable" age. However, I am a normal, well-integrated member of society. I believe this to be a result of my upbringing. My parents raised me to know the difference between right and wrong, between fantasy and reality, and between acceptable and unacceptable behavior. Mostly they taught me to be honest and take responsibility for my actions. I believe that your protest only supports the further distancing of our society from personal responsibility. You argue that instead of parents taking responsibility for raising their children in a world full of potentially corrupting influences, the world should just be cleansed of those influences. However, sex and violence are very real parts of the world, and children who are never exposed to them will never understand them. I understand that violence is wrong because I was exposed to violence through play and media, but told that in real life it was wrong to hurt others. I understand the dangers of promiscuity and reckless sex because I was exposed to sex in a healthy environment, not because I was completely shielded from it. It is not the fault of Rockstar that some people who play their games lack the quality of upbringing necessary for them to understand the difference between acceptable and unacceptable. Arguing that they should not produce games that you deem unacceptable takes that decision away from responsible adults like me. By making yourselves the arbiters of what is and isn't acceptable, you are trying to supplant the position of parent. Ultimately this takes responsibility for a child out of the hands of the parent. Personally I prefer to promote a system where a child is a parent's primary responsibility.

    --
    This sig has been stolen. Return it to its original user for a reward.
  89. No Such Thing as Bad Publicity by reiggin · · Score: 1

    If I were Rockstar, I'd be dancing in the cubicles. Clearly, at this point, the demands are ludicrious and even if they do pan out to any actions, it'll take forever. In the meantime, the publicity alone will drive up sales. Buy low, sale high. Heck, if I were more of a conspiracy theorist, I'd wonder if Rockstar paid for the protesters and faked all of this.

  90. I beg to differ by rbarreira · · Score: 1
    --

    The AACS key is NOT 0xF606EEFD628B1CA427BEA93A9CA9773F
  91. Peacaholics need to start at home! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thanks for the link. For grins, I mapped the address shown on the form.

    http://maps.google.com/maps?q=1926+Martin+Lucther+ King+Jr.+Ave,+S.E.++Washington,+D.C.+20032&spn=0.0 21649,0.040525&hl=en

    As a local to the area, I can tell you that this is quite ironic. "Peacaholics" is located in one of the most voilent areas of town (Southeast DC).

    They should seriously work on fixing their own neighborhood first. Far more lives are at stake due to poverty, drugs and corruption right outside their own front door, than could ever be associated with this Rockstar flap.

  92. Mass Conformity by eleven357 · · Score: 1

    When I first heard about this, I was actually shocked. The thing that bothered me was that I am 27 years old and I couldn't even rent the game. They always have to put the blame on someone when it comes to anything that gets national attention. This reminds me of the whole '2 Live Crew' issue with their album 'Nasty As They Wanna Be'. I remember that there were people protesting '2 Live Crew' and parents' making a big issue along with womens' rights groups saying how degrading their music was. Well then don't buy the music if you don't like it. We do have a choice. So what I say to parents all across america is that the REAL issue is you haven't been paying attention to the kind of content of your children's entertainment. If you don't want your children playing 'ultra-violent' video games, then don't buy them and pay more attention at the game store when you go to purchase them. Now everyone is jumping on the bandwagon on hating Rockstar. Just like how Quake and DOOM got all that attention after the Columbine shooting. Its just too bad that a video game company has to be the scapegoat now.

    Remember when the music industry tried to implement the 'Explicit Lyrics' sticker to rate the content of music? Well Basically you had to be 18 or older to buy any music with this label. Unfortunately (for the music rating system) I think I was only turned down once for buying music prior to my 18th bday. My point is that this doesn't suprise me at all about another ratings system not working properly.

  93. Re:Anyone have stats on carjacking rates since GTA by ToastyKen · · Score: 1

    Of course, but in the case of youth violence, for instance, the fact that the crime numbers went down DOES mean that IF video games increased violence, their effect was not significant enough to offset whatever factors decreased it, so at the very least, unless there were very significant factors having a positive effect, video games did not have a significant negative effect.

    As for those stats, all I could find was that carjackings went down in the years leading up to 2002.. but 2002 is when GTA3 was released, and I haven't seen any stats for after that.

  94. Those demands ARE hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    unlike your posting

  95. Games and Ratings by likewowandstuff · · Score: 2, Informative

    Anyone curious about how many "Adults Only" games there really are? Nineteen. You can use the ESRB advanced search form to list games by rating or features.

  96. Rockstar's next Game by H0D_G · · Score: 1

    Rockstar's next game will cast you as a pantsless psychopath that spends the entire time turning to the camera and saying 'remember kids, try this at home!' and what kind of name is 'Peaceoholics', anyway? "Hi, my name is Fred, and I'm a peaceoholic" "Hello, Fred"

    --
    Kids! Bringing about Armageddon can be dangerous. Do not attempt it in your home!