Slashdot Mirror


Linspire 5.0 Free For Limited Time

drunkennewfiemidget writes "The people at Linspire are giving Linspire 5.0 away for free (digital download only) until September 6th. Simply go to purchase the $49.95 digital edition, and then enter coupon code 'freespire' to receive a $49.95 discount." From the site: "'Freespire' was the term Andrew Betts gave to a private project he had been working on. The project comprised various open source components, taken from the freely available source repository for the Linspire operating system...Linspire has no problem with anyone using the open source code from our operating system - in fact we applaud such projects. The name Freespire, however, did create some confusion in the short time it was used...We thought it would be fun, for all of those who were looking at this project to experience a true 'Freespire', to give away a free digital copy of Linspire for a few days!"

302 comments

  1. n/t by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hey, BeOS did this right before they died too.

    1. Re:n/t by CyricZ · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      It's good that they did. It has allowed the tradition and pure power of BeOS to still be usable today.

      And then there's always Zeta OS. I would hardly call BeOS "dead".

      To suggest that Linspire will go the way of Be, Inc. is to flaw.

      --
      Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
    2. Re:n/t by KinkifyTheNation · · Score: 1

      I think I have an older copy of Linspire sitting around on my hard drive from an earlier free download. This isn't the first time they've done this.

    3. Re:n/t by koreaman · · Score: 1

      Then how do you explain the word "flawed" which seems to be the past participle of "flaw"?

      x is flawed.

    4. Re:n/t by OrangeSpyderMan · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I would hardly call BeOS "dead".

      Yes, my Commodre64 still works. Doesn't stop it being dead ;-)

      --
      Try NetBSD... safe,straightforward,useful.
    5. Re:n/t by CyricZ · · Score: 0

      No, sir, you're quite wrong.

      error (noun) -> "to err" (infinitive verb)
      flaw (noun) -> "to flaw" (infinitive verb)

      --
      Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
    6. Re:n/t by CyricZ · · Score: 1

      BeOS is still being very actively developed, be it in the form of yellowTab Zeta OS and BeOS Max. Indeed, it is incorrect to call it "dead" while it is still under very rapid and frequent development!

      And there's no basis to suggest that Linspire will follow in the steps of BeOS just because a version of both were given away for free at one point.

      --
      Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
    7. Re:n/t by XchristX · · Score: 1

      "To continue your pedantic bent, flaw is a noun. Please do not verb nouns. Thank you"


      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerund

      --
      l'Homme n'est Rien l'Oeuvre Tout: Gustave Flaubert to George Sand
    8. Re:n/t by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a different ending, related, of course, to the verb ending -ed. It's used to form adjectives. It also explains words/phrases like "green-eyed" and "snot-nosed". Clearly, these are not from verbs.

    9. Re:n/t by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 3, Funny

      I've got a free version of Windows 2003 (currently situated under my coffee mug).

      Is that dead too? >g<

    10. Re:n/t by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you implying the word "flaw" in that sentence behaves as a gerund? Are you a moron? The answers to these two questions are bound to be the same.

    11. Re:n/t by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's quite clear the original poster should have said "to err" instead of "to flaw," and indeed the latter as an intransitive verb makes absolutely no sense in the context of that sentence. You shouldn't try to upstage your superiors. It's unbecoming of a stupid git like you.

    12. Re:n/t by JPriest · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Someone else start giving away a distro based on Linspire and named it Freespire. They ended up having Freespire renamed to "squiggle" to eliminate product confusion! That reminds me of another story I know :)

      --
      Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
    13. Re:n/t by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've got a free version of Windows 2003 (currently situated under my coffee mug).
      Is that dead too?


      um... yes?

    14. Re:n/t by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      Most of the style guides now agree that it is OK to verb nouns. After all, it is accepted practice even in Skakespeare's work.

    15. Re:n/t by plughead · · Score: 1

      Gawd, I *wish*!

      --
      If a giant oil company wanted an abortion, would W's head explode?
    16. Re:n/t by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem isn't verbing. It's that "flaw" is a far less appropriate word in context than "err," and the original poster's word choice was obviously borne of ignorance, not style.

    17. Re:n/t by Datoyminaytah · · Score: 1

      I guess no one got the A/C's joke.

      --
      assert(birth_date<time-86400)
    18. Re:n/t by pugugly · · Score: 1

      You say that as if there not active development on the C-64!

      I'll admit, that it's insane that people do so, but it has active development. Plus a gorgeous Geek babe suitable for lowering IQ's! Do Freespire and BeOS have gorgeous geekbabes? I think not!

      Pug

      --
      An Invisible Entity of Vast Power whose existence must be taken on faith alone: Liberal Media
    19. Re:n/t by willdenniss · · Score: 1

      hehe, damn just when my mod points run out :(

    20. Re:n/t by XchristX · · Score: 1

      The noun 'flaw' (specifically) was misused here, I agree. However, the original poster to whom I replied made the implication that verbing nouns (any noun) is incorrect. That is not true. If he had said "Please do not verb THIS noun", it would've been ok.

      Now who's the moron I wonder?

      --
      l'Homme n'est Rien l'Oeuvre Tout: Gustave Flaubert to George Sand
    21. Re:n/t by cfuse · · Score: 1

      I've got a free version of Windows 2003 (currently situated under my coffee mug).

      Is that dead too?

      Some things don't die - they just smell bad instead.

    22. Re:n/t by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The plain truth is clear - you are all morons. Or we are all morons... I haven't quite worked that out yet...
      I am constantly astounded by the vivacity of the English language, and today is no exception. To "verb" a noun? Can you show me a dictionary where "to verb" anything has an entry? The original troll over grammar illustrates my point precisely. We are constantly renewing and changing the way we speak and write. This has happened for the last 100,000 years at least, so it should not bother us! When will the toss-pots realise that the only thing that can never be controlled is how we chose to express ourselves!
      Salem
      Antoine

  2. Poor server... by doxology · · Score: 5, Funny

    Looks like server suicide to me...

    --
    sigfault. core dumped.
    1. Re:Poor server... by Jords · · Score: 1

      Slashdotted! Hehe, Linspire may have done too well with their marketing ploy... Bet their on the phone to their hosting company complaining :D

    2. Re:Poor server... by Rhett's+Dad · · Score: 2, Funny

      Server suicide is right... I'm watching the paint dry and the grass grow while just trying to go forward one single web page... just when I thought I finally got a successful "Check Out", I'm stuck in the mud trying to "Create a New Account" !@#$%^

      --
      Let me introduce you to my very own DMCA-protected encryption key: BC 1B 64 4A 8D DE 49 E8 C3 7D CC EE 1A AD EE
    3. Re:Poor server... by Red+Alastor · · Score: 1

      Meanwhile, here's the link to the torrent of the LiveCD which I think is more suitable for testing purposes : http://tracker.linspire.com/torrents/linspire_live _5.0.69.torrent

      --
      Slashdot anagrams to "Sad Sloth"
  3. Digital Download? by Ryan+Huddleston · · Score: 5, Funny

    I was hoping for the analog one...

    1. Re:Digital Download? by Heem · · Score: 4, Funny

      they have that too.. you call a phone number and a customer service rep reads you the source code, line by line.

      --
      Don't Tread on Me
    2. Re:Digital Download? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, jeeze. Nerd phone sex.

    3. Re:Digital Download? by Mad+Merlin · · Score: 1
      ...you call a phone number and a customer service rep reads you the source code, line by line.

      You mean they don't even compile it for you?!

    4. Re:Digital Download? by emandres · · Score: 1

      Well, I guess they could hiss and click at you (the equivalent of listening to a modem line), but unless you're rainman, that's not very helpful.

      --
      The only way to tell the difference between a hamster and a gerbil is that the hamster has more white meat.
    5. Re:Digital Download? by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Well, actually, you can get something similar, although it's the ISP which does the digital to analog conversion, and it's not speech, but rather funny sounds. Also, you don't have to convert back to digital yourself, but have a small box to do that automatically. The whole thing is called modem access to the internet.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    6. Re:Digital Download? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can I have mine by snailmail airmail by-plane, we'll get there if we don't run outta Gas, ooops we don't have any staff, I'll get my neighbours dog to bring it round - oops he's just been run over by a truck, which just ran outta gas. Oh well, c'est la vie !

    7. Re:Digital Download? by doobydoobydoo · · Score: 1

      I don't want the hassle of compiling it, though. Will they read out the binary version, too?

  4. slashdotted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    get what you pay for

    ie. nothing

    1. Re:slashdotted by utnow · · Score: 1

      Gimp, Linux, KDE, freeBSD, gnome, firefox, FOSS...

  5. eh? by Deitheres · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Now, I'll admit I've never checked out Linspire before (I always used Debian, RedHat, or Ubuntu), but doesn't the GPL require that you give away Linux? I mean, I know you can still charge for it, but you have to provide the source code free of charge (AFAIK)

    Can someone clarify this for me?

    --
    Just like driving a car:
    (D) to go forward
    (R) to go backward

    1. Re:eh? by brilinux · · Score: 4, Informative

      I think that you answered this yourself; you may sell it, but those to whom you do sell it are entitled to the source as well. Linspire, however, has a good bit of proprietary stuff in it to which the source it not available (and it is not GPLed).

    2. Re:eh? by chill · · Score: 5, Informative

      Linspire does make the source available to GPL code. However, their distro includes Sun's JVM, Macromedia's Flash plug-in, Acroread, Real Player and several other non-free bits and pieces.

      They also have a legally-licensed DVD player (plug-in to Xine) and MP3 codec that are available cheaply ($5 ?) to subscribers.

      So, the entire PACKAGE isn't available for give away - normally.

        -Charles

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    3. Re:eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Although it's clear you're just trolling given your posting history, I suppose I'll answer this one. If you hadn't noticed in the SUMMARY OF THE ARTICLE YOU JUST COMMENTED ON, it said the following:

      "The project comprised various open source components, taken from the freely available source repository for the Linspire operating system...Linspire has no problem with anyone using the open source code from our operating system - in fact we applaud such projects."

      I mean really, is it that difficult to read about what you're discussing at the bare minimum required, or is even that too much to ask of a Slashdotter now?

    4. Re:eh? by hoka · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I believe that the way it works is that you must distribute source to those people that you distribute binaries to. So if say you use something for internal use only within a company, you arn't required to publish the source. And it probably isn't a big deal for them to have a source cd or source download available. Let us also not forget that not everything used in most distros is GPL, as there are plenty of Public Domain/BSD/LGPL licenses out there.

    5. Re:eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, you have to provide the source code plus all modifications, plus the source code to anything you make that uses that code. Nothing has to be free as in price tag.

      http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html

    6. Re:eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps I should have clarified what I was asking.

      I understand that Linspire includes various portions that are NOT GPL. However, the kernel is GPL, and the window manager appears (at least to me) to be just a slightly modified version of KDE. Would they not be required to release a version that includes all of the GPL portions of the code?

      Oh, and you're an asshole.

      Although it's clear you're just trolling given your posting history

      You must be an idiot to think that.

    7. Re:eh? by Deitheres · · Score: 1

      Thanks. That's what I was looking for.

      I guess I should have been a little more clear in my original post.

      --
      Just like driving a car:
      (D) to go forward
      (R) to go backward

    8. Re:eh? by martalli · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Apparently the GPL parts of the repository are free, so people could use the repository to build their own project, much as White Box Linux has used the RHEL repositories to create a similar, entirely free distro.

      Moreover, the maintainers apparently have a good humor about the confusion over the Freespire project. Another company might have just served a subpoena to Andrew Betts, asking for trumped up damages and whatnot.

    9. Re:eh? by Skreems · · Score: 1

      I haven't used it myself, but I looked at the install page, and got the impression that they have an app repository similary to Gentoo / Ubuntu. If that's the case, then whil they have to give away the source code along with any distributed binaries, they're in no way required to give access to their app repository for free. They can charge as much as they like for access to their servers, and be well within the limits of the GPL.

      --
      Slashdot needs a "-1, Wrong" moderation option.
      The Urban Hippie
    10. Re:eh? by DigitalReverend · · Score: 1

      Also under GPL, you are free to charge for the downloading of said product, as well as charge for any other method of distribution.

      --
      I read Slashdot for the headlines, because the headlines, unlike the articles, are usually original and never duplicated
    11. Re:eh? by slapout · · Score: 1

      That's suppose to also include some codecs for windows media that they got the rights to as part of there settlement.

      --
      Coder's Stone: The programming language quick ref for iPad
    12. Re:eh? by psm321 · · Score: 1

      That's a common misconception about the GPL. It simply requires that you provide source to people that you distribute the binary to. They of course are then free to distribute that source (or binaries compiled from it along with source) to whoever they want. In fact, the fact that you can download most distributions from their sites is simply a courtesy (or maybe marketing) on their part.

    13. Re:eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The source code is available free of charge. Therefor the experimental freespire project..
      "The new name is under discussion ... a temporary codename of 'Squiggle' has been assigned to the project." http://www.desktoplinux.com/news/NS9384033541.html

      That lead to another round of free Linspire OS downloads.

      Due to http://osnews.com/
      In a short story with a happy ending, the developer of a free version of Linspire called Freespire has agreed to change the name of his project, and Linspire is offering free copies of Linspire Linux for a few days. Freespire, which first popped up on Distrowatch last week, described itself as a free variant of Linspire Linux, with proprietary components and trademarks removed.

    14. Re:eh? by Red+Alastor · · Score: 1
      Moreover, the maintainers apparently have a good humor about the confusion over the Freespire project. Another company might have just served a subpoena to Andrew Betts, asking for trumped up damages and whatnot.

      Not they could not. They already got sued by Microsoft because they used to be called Lindows and Microsoft said it confused people. If they sued someone for the same thing, it would be very bad publicity.

      --
      Slashdot anagrams to "Sad Sloth"
    15. Re:eh? by Jaseoldboss · · Score: 1

      several other non-free bits and pieces

      (non-)free as in speech I assume. All of those components are available at no cost provided you agree to the licence.

      I must admit I have a problem with a product that takes 95% of its functionality from open-source, adds a few proprietary components and sells it for $59. That's clearly diverting funds from open source to the propietary component providers IMO.

    16. Re:eh? by PhilHibbs · · Score: 1

      He said "Another company", not "they". I think he meant Microsoft. Linspire don't mind about Freespire, but Microsoft clearly would mind about Freedows or Lindows.

    17. Re:eh? by rdoger6424 · · Score: 1

      The way I see it, when you pay for linux, you're actually paying for support, so that if you screw up the kernel, and you're a n00b (like me), you won't be as screwed.

      --
      "Hello 911? I just tried to toast some bread, and the toaster grew an arm and stabbed me in the face!"
  6. Crap, by BAILOPAN · · Score: 2, Funny

    my browser only supports analog downloads.

    --
    If you say "here goes my karma" I will bite you!!!
    1. Re:Crap, by PygmySurfer · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Crap,(Score:1,Redundant)

      If you say "here goes my karma" I will bite you!!!

      There goes your Karma

  7. dead by StephenWertz · · Score: 1

    The server is slammed at the moment, guess everybodys getting it while its good...

    1. Re:dead by ViaD · · Score: 0

      The subscription is not limited. The cupon gives you free Linspire, even if it takes a little time to get it...

  8. First post by abirdman · · Score: 4, Informative

    because everyone is busy downloading the software? They've already posted warnings that the site is getting "slammed" and that the coupon processing doesn't always work. And the download is a separate step via BitTorrent, so it should be great-- the more downloaders the better. They recommend trying between 11:00pm and 5:00am Eastern Time.

    --
    Everything I've ever learned the hard way was based on a statistically invalid sample.
    1. Re:First post by jgionet · · Score: 1

      good luck getting it for a few days via bittorrent.. I've been trying for over 24hours now and it's still barely moving.. most of the time I'm getting 0 kbps by the time I get the iso a new version will be out.

    2. Re:First post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know the feeling, seems to happen everytime I finally get Gentoo compiled and configured..

    3. Re:First post by brickballs · · Score: 1

      seriously? I'm downloading at 79 kB right now, uploading at 37 (thats about my max upload) I'll leave it seeding for a good while though.

      --
      "What does slashdotting mean?"
      "You've never heard of slashdot?"
      "I know it makes websites not work."
    4. Re:First post by Ironsides · · Score: 1

      care to post a mirror of the torrent?

      --
      Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
    5. Re:First post by brickballs · · Score: 2, Informative
      --
      "What does slashdotting mean?"
      "You've never heard of slashdot?"
      "I know it makes websites not work."
    6. Re:First post by psyon1 · · Score: 1

      I remember getting a free copy of Linspire 4.5 through a brain bench offer, it did not require a serial or anything. Does 5.0? If not, isnt that torrent warez?

    7. Re:First post by brickballs · · Score: 1

      The torrent came straight from the linspire website. definately not warez. Not sure about the serial, but it didnt seem like it would require one...

      --
      "What does slashdotting mean?"
      "You've never heard of slashdot?"
      "I know it makes websites not work."
    8. Re:First post by JourneyExpertApe · · Score: 1
      They recommend trying between 11:00pm and 5:00am Eastern Time.

      Well, it's about 12:10 am Eastern time here, and this is what I get when I try to download:
      Looking for "Freespire" (a free copy of Linspire)? You've come to the right place... Currently all of our servers are busy. Thanks for your interest in Linspire's Limited special offer. Our servers are trying to deal with the massive number of customers that are interested in getting their free copy of Linspire OS. Please be patient, and come back later while we deal with all of our incoming requests. We apologize for the inconvenience. The Linspire Team.
      Could their servers really be this busy at 9:10 pm PST on a Friday, or is this just a clever marketing move. "Sure, you can have it for free...oh, sorry, we just ran out. Would you like to buy the retail boxed version instead?"
      --
      If you can read this sig, you're too close.
    9. Re:First post by JourneyExpertApe · · Score: 2, Funny

      Could their servers really be this busy at 9:10 pm PST on a Friday, or is this just a clever marketing move.

      On another note, I've just decided to end all interogatives with a [finger quotes]question mark[/finger quotes] (?).

      --
      If you can read this sig, you're too close.
    10. Re:First post by Ironsides · · Score: 1

      thanks, dam servers keep having a time out (even at 1 am est) and not giving the straight torrent.

      --
      Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
    11. Re:First post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    12. Re:First post by grolschie · · Score: 1

      Hi the back button and refresh each time you get the message. I did that, and it took about 2 mins to get through the entire sequence. Because cookies are used, once you apply the coupon it's in your shopping cart. Once done, create an account and go to My Products.

    13. Re:First post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      great, that link seems to help

  9. Credit Card Information? by ClaraBow · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Does anyone know if one needs to provide any personal info to download the software, like your credit card #?

    1. Re:Credit Card Information? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      nope, just redeem the "coupon" (freespire) and check out, you can register if you want support (my.linspire) but AFAICS thats it !
      its slashdotted now , and probably will be for a while (Opera had the same problem with their download giveaway) maybe this is a trend ? nahh
      be nice if other companies could do the same, but gree^^^^ is more important, gotta get that new boat !

    2. Re:Credit Card Information? by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 3, Funny

      Credit card to get something free? Methinks somebody's been hitting too many pr0n sites. ;)

    3. Re:Credit Card Information? by b100dian · · Score: 1

      Simply go to purchase the $49.95 digital edition, and then enter coupon code 'freespire' to receive a $49.95 discount.

      The kid has some reason to worry:)

      --
      gtkaml.org
    4. Re:Credit Card Information? by DaHat · · Score: 1

      I could have sworn this news came out a month or two ago and I took a look... but to get it you had to sign up for an account, which required a credit card number. While they claimed they wouldn't bill you unless you said so, you couldn't sign up without a CC #.

    5. Re:Credit Card Information? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just your email address and a password of your choosing...so yes.

    6. Re:Credit Card Information? by Nimey · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Why don't you try it and find out, luser?

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    7. Re:Credit Card Information? by azrane2005 · · Score: 0

      I don't know how it is now, back back in the day when they offered free 4.5 versions to deviantART, we only had to supply our email and passwords to get the files. Never have I been asked for a credit card number, though, you can enter your info, for future purchases (if any) from My.Linspire.

    8. Re:Credit Card Information? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been trying it for half the day, myself, lasshole. Site's slashdotted.

  10. urg by void*p · · Score: 0, Redundant

    dang, already flooded

    1. Re:urg by FragHARD · · Score: 2, Funny

      thats because the server is probably in New Orleans.

      --
      FragHARD or don't frag at all
  11. There are easier ways to do this by Jailbrekr · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They'd get alot more attention if they did a gpl'ed version that was free and available as a torrent. This is nothing more than a not so subtle attempt to pump the number of installs that they can claim are currently running. Marketing ploy anyone?

    --
    Feed the need: Digitaladdiction.net
    1. Re:There are easier ways to do this by badboy_tw2002 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Marketing ploy? Advertizing your product by giving it away in order to spread word of mouth.....uhhhhh, DO YA THINK? Of course its a marketing ploy, and a good one if you ask me. (Downloading right now...) Its a company, they want to make money. Don't act surprised.

      AFAIK they can't GPL it because of non-free portions of the distro (JVM, Flash).

    2. Re:There are easier ways to do this by VvScythevV · · Score: 1

      *shrug* They have a torrent for the version they are giving away for free.

      --
      -- Reality is for people who lack imagination.
    3. Re:There are easier ways to do this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      But then it would be just like Ubuntu, MEPIS, and others. Yaawwwnnnn

      Linspire is unique in that it has legally licensed things like MP3, Java, Flash, Windows Media, Quick Time, Real, Nvidia drivers, music files, etc. If you take all that away, you don't have Linspire, you have Ubuntu and have to be a friggin' genius and figure out how to get all that on your own. But of course, for this crowd (slashdot) it's not a big deal, but for 98% of the rest of the world, it's very important.

    4. Re:There are easier ways to do this by Enahs · · Score: 1

      I was about to disagree, but, um, I can't. Linspire sounds sweet, and it sounds like something I'd be interested in, if I was trying to convert someone else to Linux, or at least something cheaper/with less strings than Windows or OS X.

      --
      Stating on Slashdot that I like cheese since 1997.
    5. Re:There are easier ways to do this by aichpvee · · Score: 1

      MAGNET LINK!

      --
      The Farewell Tour II
    6. Re:There are easier ways to do this by Kelson · · Score: 1

      And the second marketing ploy of this type to hit Slashdot this week, too!

      From what I've seen in the Opera forums, their 1-day giveaway has been quite successful at both generating buzz and bringing in new users.

    7. Re:There are easier ways to do this by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      Nvidia's drivers are freely available to everyone. Sun is similarly free with Java. What is so special about Linspire's inclusion of them?

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    8. Re:There are easier ways to do this by PunkOfLinux · · Score: 1

      Simple. The end-user doesn't have to go get the stuff themselves; it's for lazy people./

    9. Re:There are easier ways to do this by TheSpoom · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The Opera giveaway converted me. As much as I dislike the zealots who basically are walking ads for Opera and think they can do no wrong, it does seem to be much faster on this computer, the download manager is much better, and there are several features built into the tab system that aren't readily available in Firefox. I think I'll be silently using this for a while.

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
    10. Re:There are easier ways to do this by drsquare · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because you don't need to:
      1. Find the drivers.
      2. Download them.
      3. Use the command line to use them.
      4. Exit X and use some complicated program to install them.
      5. It JFW.

      Same with all that other crap. Yeah if you were a computer nerd you could spend a while downloading and installing it all, but if you're not a technical genius, you want something that just fucking works, so you can concentrate on important stuff, like actually using your computer.

    11. Re:There are easier ways to do this by empaler · · Score: 1

      Greasemonkey screwed itself up during my last round of updates and the big 'O' is less vulnerable (read: no unpatched known vulnerabilities), so it was an easy choice to start migrating...

    12. Re:There are easier ways to do this by bogie · · Score: 1

      "Because you don't need to:
      1. Find the drivers.
      2. Download them.
      3. Use the command line to use them.
      4. Exit X and use some complicated program to install them.
      5. It JFW."

      Ever used Ubuntu and Synaptic?

      "if you're not a technical genius, you want something that just fucking works, so you can concentrate on important stuff, like actually using your computer."

      Riggghhtt. That's why you'd want to buy an OS that 1% of desktop users use and has no support for almost anything that just came out in the stores either hardware or software wise.

      Lindows is only useful if your on their "pay us 10x's the cost of windows every year to use our software repository". $49 a year for unlimited access to software that is overwhelmingly already Free. And don't worry, if you forget Linspire will automagically charge your credit card year after year after year. Wow your right, "thinking" as I like to call it and using the package manager of a Free distro just isn't worth it. What a good son you are to stick your "I know nothing about computers" Mom with Linspire.

      Face it, if your going to go out and buy a proprietary nix that has ease of use and industry support Lindows is a shitty choice. Buy a fucking mac mini and be done with it. As anyone here will tell you I give Apple shit constantly. But compared to proprietary linux they are better by a fucking billion miles.

      Otherwise save some money, use Ubuntu or fedora and take 5 minutes to read any of the many guides to adding software to your system. There aren't many things worse then dealing with desktop linux when you are new to OSS. It fucking sucks. Over the long term though Lindows is the exception to that rule.

      --
      If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
    13. Re:There are easier ways to do this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whats an easier way to adveritise, then getting your site /.ed
      (assuming you can avoid the /. effect)

    14. Re:There are easier ways to do this by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      Not every distro is Debian. If the maintainers of the distro aren't free software zealots, they can add these things.

      I use Mandrake.

      Yeah if you were a computer nerd...[Blah Blah Blah]

      Do people expect to buy cars and never have to put gas in them or change the oil? Why should they expect to use something as complex as a computer while having no knowledge of what happens inside of them?

      If you couldn't be bothered, then you shouldn't bother.

      The en masse migration of grandmothers and children to the world of computers has only succeeded in bringing us things like CPIA, chain letter virus hoaxes and the Blaster worm.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    15. Re:There are easier ways to do this by JourneyExpertApe · · Score: 1

      Of course its a marketing ploy, and a good one if you ask me. (Downloading right now...)
      [boldface added]

      Well, if I could download it, I might agree with you. But all I get is a screen saying that their servers are too busy. I already have Fedora Core 4 and WinXP installed on my computer, so when I saw that screen, I lost my momentary interest in Linspire. I imagine most people with WinXP and/or any Linux distro installed feel the same: *yawn*.

      --
      If you can read this sig, you're too close.
    16. Re:There are easier ways to do this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is shit. You download this and then need to pay $50 or more per year to stay up to date. No thanks.

    17. Re:There are easier ways to do this by Chris+Karcher · · Score: 1

      The other 98% of the world uses linux?

    18. Re:There are easier ways to do this by juhaz · · Score: 1

      Ever used Ubuntu and Synaptic?

      Yes. You apparently haven't, or you'd know that for example Java isn't available trough the repos, and flash is only in multiverse, which isn't enabled by default. Same goes for most of the stuff grand grand parent listed.

    19. Re:There are easier ways to do this by Baricom · · Score: 1

      Not me. I did take a code and register, but I still have the same complaints I always have - the window layout system is buggy (particularly the progress bar, which never comes up when the dialog box says it should), and the keystrokes are too different from IE and Firefox (yes, I could change them, but that'd be a lot of extra work that they should have done for me).

      I can't think of any conceivable circumstance where I would have actually registered Opera, so no money was lost on me. What they might have bought themselves is more compatibility on the sites I develop, since it's a lot more comfortable to test without the flashing ad on top of the window.

    20. Re:There are easier ways to do this by Burz · · Score: 1
      Otherwise save some money, use Ubuntu or fedora and take 5 minutes to read any of the many guides to adding software to your system. There aren't many things worse then dealing with desktop linux when you are new to OSS.

      I'd never send an average user into the frightful wilderness that is the Synaptic UI. It's nice for those of us with experience... but c'mon, apps are indistishinguishable from all of the many MANY other little pieces in the repository.

      OTOH, Linspire comes complete with what seems like every codec and reader in semi-common use... AND they are well integrated into Firefox and Konqueror. Using it for viewing content is a dream even compared to Windows XP... the Mac can't hold a candle to it here (wish I could get as many codecs for OSX/PPC).

      It also has CNR which defaults to just showing the user applications...gosh what a concept! It's too bad Fedora and Ubuntu haven't progressed beyond the 1970s in this respect.

      And if you don't like CNR or don't want to pay for the support you get with it, then add the Debian repository to sources.list. Sheesh!

      Here is a guide on 'hacking' Linspire 5. It is very short.

      Stop acting like Linspire (or any commercial Linux) is restricting or trapping users just because the distro is easy to use. If "expert" Linux users and coders started with thoughtfully-assembled distros like this one more often, then perhaps more applications would be packaged such that a non-sysadmin can properly recognize and handle them.

    21. Re:There are easier ways to do this by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      The end-user doesn't have to go get the stuff themselves; it's for lazy people./


      RedHat, Mandrake, SuSE, Slackware and several others add in many of these things as well.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    22. Re:There are easier ways to do this by cfuse · · Score: 1
      But of course, for this crowd (slashdot) it's not a big deal, but for 98% of the rest of the world, it's very important.

      That 98% doesn't use Linux because it doesn't come with Windows or AOL ...

      Just because they've got opposable thumbs doesn't mean that they know how to use them.

    23. Re:There are easier ways to do this by IdolizingStewie · · Score: 1

      Java's not in the default repositories, but all you have to do is go in and enable the other repositories in the list, same as flash. (Not that I figured this out until after I had downloaded it from Sun already) Besides, there's step-by-step instructions with commands you can cut and paste for everything basic you might want to add in the Wiki anyway.

  12. Worth it? by OnceWas · · Score: 4, Insightful

    From what I have read, people haven't been all that impressed with Linspire. Even if it's free, is it worth the trouble with all the other distributions out there?

    --
    Laugh while you can, monkey-boy.
    1. Re:Worth it? by FudRucker · · Score: 1

      i agree, i am sticking with Slackware, it is already installed and configured quite nicely for use as a desktop...

      --if it aint broke, break it

      --
      Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
    2. Re:Worth it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      guess what? nobody fucking cares.

    3. Re:Worth it? by joeljkp · · Score: 4, Informative

      I have a subscription, and I've tried 5.0. I quickly moved to Fedora and Ubuntu, though. I suppose if you like KDE and the KDE way of doing things, you might be happy with it. I was very impressed at its installation, and the fact that it configured absolutely everything (including ndiswrapper and Windows Broadcom drivers!) properly the first time.

      But it's an extremely inelegant system... you've got package names like nvidia-driver-modules-2.6.10_1.0.6629.is.1.0.6111- 0.0.0.50.linspire0.3.0.4.m10.1.deb... what?? Those who like the simple and elegant would perhaps enjoy Fedora or Ubuntu more.

      --
      WeRelate.org - wiki-based genealogy
  13. It's rather quite impressive. by CyricZ · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Linspire is actually quite impressive. It is a step in the right direction for desktop Linux. While not as easy to use as Mac OS X, for instance, it is still an ideal system to set up for office use, and is quite friendly to the new Linux user.

    It provides an excellent stepping stone towards SuSE or Debian. A new user gets the basics down pat easily and quickly, and soon he or she is ready to use a more traditional Linux distro.

    --
    Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
    1. Re:It's rather quite impressive. by PsychicX · · Score: 1

      Interesting that you mention OSX...Linspire's site design bears a striking resemblance to Apple.com.

    2. Re:It's rather quite impressive. by DrXym · · Score: 1

      I disagree that it's ideal for office use. It's meant for single, self-administered machines and not for office environments where admins want all boxes to be maintained and kept up to date from a central point. Consequently it lacks the features that you would need to do that. I'm sure an admin could roll some scripts to take the pain from administering a bunch of Linspire boxes, but why bother? You may as well buy the right tool in the first place rather than slave away trying to remove the shortcomings of something unsuitable.

  14. Slashdotted already by ahecht · · Score: 4, Funny

    What, were they running the server on Linspire?

    1. Re:Slashdotted already by CyricZ · · Score: 1
      --
      Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
    2. Re:Slashdotted already by jonbryce · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm sure somewhere in Micheal's minutes, it says they run Red Hat. Linspire is not designed or marketed as a server OS.

    3. Re:Slashdotted already by CyricZ · · Score: 1

      Indeed, it is not specifically designed for servers. But that's not to say that it can't run Apache. Of course it can! And it will do so very well. Now, it may very well not be suitable for a large-scale, enterprise server application. But it can be used, like most any other PC Linux distro, as a server operating system.

      --
      Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
    4. Re:Slashdotted already by Halfbaked+Plan · · Score: 1

      A desktop ('workstation') copy of Windows NT 3.51 can also run Apache.

      --
      resigned
    5. Re:Slashdotted already by CyricZ · · Score: 1

      And? What exactly is your point? The workstation versions of Windows NT, much like the workstation distros of Linux, have been built upon server foundations.

      --
      Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
    6. Re:Slashdotted already by Halfbaked+Plan · · Score: 1

      The grandparent comment was praising Linux as if the fact that it can run apache, even on a 'desktop' machine, makes it a thing of wonderment. ("Of course it can!")

      --
      resigned
  15. Do you realy want it? by NRAdude · · Score: 0

    Linspire -- the expensive Linux; A Linux forever crippled in the "root" user mask; awaiting to succumb to that unknown malicious program taking the entire filesystem with it; and allowing a desktop end-user that could erase a file as easily as were in a Microsoft Windows 98 C:\Windows\System32 directory: count me out! It's a sacrifice for no gain, but the prettiest desktop environment and an excellent ("Click'n'Run") system and application maintenance. This could all be done on Microsoft Windows and none would know it were Linux save the penuin icon and the GPL here and there. I had to say it, and one more thing to say; Linspire has caused an exctraction of currency in equal likeness to the history of Microsoft Windows; when it breaks (often), I'm contracted to fix it. Please everyone, avoid this Linux flavor unless you want to cure it of its illnesses. Network Redundancy Administrator, dude! Christ M. Gregory-Thomas

    --
    without prejudice
  16. Silly question by zakezuke · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've only seen Linspire once on a Fry el cheepo machine. When trying to add on a wireless adapter I navigated to their software page and while what I needed was offered on their software update, access required a subscription.

    Does this coupon only apply to the software?

    --
    There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    1. Re:Silly question by ilyaaohell · · Score: 5, Informative

      No.

      In fact, this isn't so much a publicity stunt as a way to get more users dependant on their subscription download services, Click-N-Run (CNR). Links to that service are imbedded into practically every single menu you can find on the desktop, with no way to take them out. They are EVERYWHERE, within every sub-menu, on the taskbar, imbedded within web browsers and other programs, etc.

      Of course it's INCREDIBLY useful for people who DO end up subscribing, since this is probably the easiest, most user-friendly way to install without any effort a MASSIVE library of software. However, if you would prefer to get your software packages on your own (through apt-get or whatever) and have no use for CNR, you're just gonna be stuck with a desktop operating system whose main purpose is to get CNR subscribers.

      --
      UNIX: A computer user is defined as a programmer. WINDOWS: A computer user is defined as a consumer.
    2. Re:Silly question by Odocoileus · · Score: 1

      with no way to take them out tsk, tsk, tsk

      --
      ...
    3. Re:Silly question by Beavey · · Score: 3, Informative

      Links to that service are imbedded into practically every single menu you can find on the desktop, with no way to take them out.

      Actually, it's pretty easy to take them out:

      Start the CNR app (you don't need to subscribe), "Settings" menu, "Configure CNR", choose "CNR Warehouse" in the left pane, then uncheck "Add CNR More... options to the Launch Menu".

      Click OK and you're done.

      If you want to avoid CNR altogether, just right-click the "Launch" menu and choose "Menu Editor". Take the entries out that way, through the GUI.

      Either way, it isn't that hard to do.

    4. Re:Silly question by Hobbes897 · · Score: 1

      This is by far the most helpful post on the entire thread. Way to earn that +5.

      --
      Normality is now: overrated.
  17. Re:Headline Misleading... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Should it of?

  18. Re:Headline Misleading... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Nope, just downloaded it.. it really is free :) you just don't understand the steps you need to take to actually download it :*

  19. Ubuntu by paulproteus · · Score: 1

    I've started using Ubuntu, which I feel is set up very nice as an office system. It is very well integrated, (for example) providing one good application for each of the normal uses rather than flooding the user with "Kate (an editor), KEdit (an editor), gedit (an editor), gvim (an editor)" all in the same menu.

    How does Linspire compare? I've never tried it, though I'm currently working on downloading this to get a sense of what the buzz is about.

    --
    |/usr/games/fortune
    1. Re:Ubuntu by CyricZ · · Score: 2, Informative

      Linspire is far more specific, in terms of applications. The user really isn't informed what specific editor or browser they are using. It's just labelled "Web Browser" or "Mail Client" or "Text Editor". So it does take away a lot of the confusion from new users. It feels far more integrated.

      To be honest, I'd say Linspire is somewhat easier for a new user. But they would likely be quite at home using Ubuntu, especially after becoming familiar with Linux.

      --
      Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
    2. Re:Ubuntu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Linspire is far more specific, in terms of applications. The user really isn't informed what specific editor or browser they are using. It's just labelled "Web Browser" or "Mail Client" or "Text Editor".


      I agree, could you be any more specific than that?
    3. Re:Ubuntu by CyricZ · · Score: 1

      No, I think they're as specific as possible. If a Linspire user is told to use the "text editor" to open a file, all they have to do is click on the "Text Editor" menu icon and away they go. It's very straightforward and sensible.

      --
      Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
    4. Re:Ubuntu by stm2 · · Score: 1

      I used both. Now I use Ubuntu because it installed "out of the box" in my new Toshiba laptop. It was Christmas and Linspire Five-0 was not available when my Laptop arrived, so I tried Linspire 4.5 that was running fine in my workstation, but it didn't started the graphical installer. So I thought it was time to see was the fuzz was about with Ubuntu. And it worked. Then, when Linspre Five-0 was released, I tried it in livecd mode and it reconized my hardware, but I was to lazy to change again, since I invested some time in getting Ubuntu to work properly (install JAVA, Flash, and so on). Another reason for choosing Ubuntu over Linspire is that I do some consoulting and I prefer to recomend a free distro like Ubuntu to give pay support and recomend Linspire where most clients won't be able to buy (I am in Argentina, where 50 u$ for a Linux distro is too much money!).
      From an end-user point of view, Linspire is far better since is integreted (it doesnt seems a patchwork), but from a computing professional that sells support I prefer Ubuntu, even if I have to tweak some CL from time to time (Ubuntuguide has step by step instructions for almost everything you could ever need for Ubuntu). In a few words: Each distro has it advantages and cons.
      Sorry for my English :)

      --
      DNA in your Linux: DNALinux
    5. Re:Ubuntu by owlstead · · Score: 1

      Knoppix seems to solve that by putting things in parentheses. Since it is basically a "install once" thingy, I would have preferred it the other way around, and more grouped. But the good thing is is that you get both the name of the application and the type of program.

  20. Freedows by Theovon · · Score: 4, Funny

    Well, Lindows had to change its name to Linspire, because it was too much like Windows. Well, now Freespire is too much like Linspire. So how about we call it Freedows?

    Mind you, Frito-Lay might raise an eyebrow.

    1. Re:Freedows by CyricZ · · Score: 4, Informative

      There was previously an operating systems project named "Freedows".

      http://sourceforge.net/projects/freedows/
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedows_OS

      --
      Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
    2. Re:Freedows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, how about "Firebird" then?

    3. Re:Freedows by pharwell · · Score: 1

      Ok, I got one: Freesta!

      --
      I quote others only in order the better to express myself. -- Michel de Montaigne
  21. This is just the basic OS, right? by crivens · · Score: 1

    This is just the basic OS, right? You don't get access to their repository, what is it, click n run?

    1. Re:This is just the basic OS, right? by coop0030 · · Score: 1

      Isn't Ubuntu, using Synaptic, pretty much click n run too?

      What makes Linspire's click n run that much better?

      I do like trying all these new flavors of Linux, it is quite fun, to say the least!

    2. Re:This is just the basic OS, right? by Kelson · · Score: 1

      I think he meant the name of the repository, which, if I recall, is "Click N Run" and abbreviated as CNR.

      Hmm, there's a thought. "Nice app! CNR?"*

      *Obscure joke that you'll only get if you grew up watching TV in the 80s.

    3. Re:This is just the basic OS, right? by headzoo · · Score: 1

      Clink n' Run is a very user friend UI, with all the software categories in a sensible way. Also, you really do click 1 button and the software is installed. In my experience, CnR is a bit easier to use than Synaptic. - Sean

    4. Re:This is just the basic OS, right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You actually do get access to their repository. What the coupon does is give you a discount of $50 on a normal $50 order. That includes a download of Linspire Five-0 and a one year subscription to CNR.

  22. Speaking of confusion by metaphorever · · Score: 2, Funny
    The name Freespire, however, did create some confusion

    Unlike a name like Lindows, which people would never confuse with Windows.

    --
    If people continue to abuse this feature, I will have to remove it. - Slashdot Comment Box, 1998
    1. Re:Speaking of confusion by geekoid · · Score: 1

      I didn't know anyone actually confused those two companies.

      However there is software called freespire which is not the freespire you ger from linspire.
      THAT'S the confusion.

      freespire.org

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  23. Whats it like? by jefferson_uk · · Score: 1

    Has anyone had much experience with Linspire/Lindows? What makes it better than all the other distro's...Fedora, Mandrake, Ubuntu, etc

    Or is it just the same as the rest but with a shiny box and a pricetag?

    --
    echo $sig;
    1. Re:Whats it like? by mpapet · · Score: 1

      I tried it a while ago and it was very good then. At the time the fit-and-finish was tighter than many desktop distros.

      It didn't knock me out graphically, but it is a very good "light user switching to linux from winblows" kind of distro. Ideally, there are some people to call if you have problems with an application. Which is what the normal user prefers.

      Like another post said, I wiped it when the wireless drivers weren't included. By now, they must be though.

      --
      http://www.maxineudall.com/2010/02/should-economists-be-sued-for-malpractice.html
    2. Re:Whats it like? by i.of.the.storm · · Score: 1

      i think it's aimed at people who can't use linux themselves but are tired of viruses. it's like this: linspire sees all these n00bs who are getting pwn3d by teh evil hax0rs, so they make a d!stro for teh n00bs. got it?

      --
      All your base are belong to Wii.
    3. Re:Whats it like? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's initially a very nice, warm feeling. After a minute or so, you will be overcome by an intense wave of euphoria, lasting a couple of seconds. Immediately after that, you will lose all interest. It will seem like any other distro, and while you may keep it just to avoid having to go download something new, you won't really care whether it stays or goes.

      In other words, it's like having a child. HTH.

    4. Re:Whats it like? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ease of use. 2% of computer users are technical, but 98% are just users, not engineers. Think of it as the difference of someone who works on cars and those who just drive them. Those who work on them don't mind tinkering with their carburetor or transmission, but for most, they just want to get in their car and drive. Linspire is for those people. They really take ease of use to an extreme. Most of you reading this won't need those training wheels, but most regular people will.

      It's kind of like AOL. I never used it, but I DID recommend it to all my friends back when the net was becoming popular, because AOL made things really easy for the novice. AOL - So Easy To Use, No Wonder It's #1.

    5. Re:Whats it like? by Barryke · · Score: 1

      same goes for windows. and msn. and lots of (non-geek or engeneering) software program.

      --
      Hivemind harvest in progress..
    6. Re:Whats it like? by headzoo · · Score: 1

      I used it for about 6 months before switching to SuSE, and actually I'm still an Linspire Insider. Think of Linspire as Linux with a bit of a Microsoft twist. Meaning it's not nearly as powerful as other distros, but it's more user friendly. It's a great distro for your grandmother who can barley turn on a computer. - Sean

    7. Re:Whats it like? by BadMackTuck · · Score: 1

      I use Linspire on a daily basis. It's really simple for those of use who don't know linux that well. It's the only distro I know of that installing new software is actually easy. You click a button, and there it is a few minutes later. It's easy to install, too.

      But, really the best part about linspire is Cedega. Yeah you've got to pay for it, but playing windows games on a not-so-windows box is really quite a good time.

      That's what I think.

    8. Re:Whats it like? by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      it's great but wil require you to pay for a CNR subscription to install anything.

      it's a "taste this now pay a yearly CNR fee.

      (CNR = Click and RUN) their installer that requires talking to their server for EVERYTHING.

      dont even bother downloading it. you will hate it after 20 minutes if you do not pay for the CNR subscription.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    9. Re:Whats it like? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "(CNR = Click and RUN) their installer that requires talking to their server for EVERYTHING.
      dont even bother downloading it. you will hate it after 20 minutes if you do not pay for the CNR subscription."

      I bought a cheap pc with Lindows pre-installed as my first Linux pc. It took about 20 minutes and I hated it just for this reason. I didn't want to pay for a subscription without knowing more about it and I couldn't seem to do anything without connecting to their server. I set the whole thing aside and sent for a set of Mandrake install disks. Mandrake was an easy install and I'm still using it today.

  24. Just great... by waynegoode · · Score: 3, Funny

    Just great...

    I've been trying to just "order" the software for 3-4 hours, not download it, but the shop site is S L O W. Just had to go and post on Slashdot, didn't you? Coundn't wait until I finally got my "order" in. Just great...

    1. Re:Just great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm signing up on my OS X machine.

      It definitely feels snappier.

    2. Re:Just great... by HydroPhonic · · Score: 1
    3. Re:Just great... by advb89 · · Score: 0

      I know, i was already having problems, and now its slashdotted... Aaarrrghhh!!!!!!

      --
      <overrated>Insert Sig Here</overrated>
  25. Grammar nazi says... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Should it of?

    should H A V E!!!

    1. Re:Grammar nazi says... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      jokemeister says: "BIG FAT FLAMING WHOOOOOOSSSSSHHH!"

      Lameness filter encountered. Post aborted! Reason: Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING.

      Support life! Down with aborted posts!

  26. It depends what sort of a user you are. by CyricZ · · Score: 2, Informative

    I could see a Linux poweruser not being overly satisfied with Linspire. If you're used to running Debian or Slackware, then you'll probably not be all that impressed. Linspire aims to make Linux easy to use. And in doing so they may alienate users who prefer the power of a more traditional Linux distro. But for a person who is new to Linux, it provides a very enjoyable and usable experience.

    It all depends on what type of user you are, and what sort of system you're looking for. While it is great for new users or those who just want a system who works, it may not be what a person who's looking for a more hands-on experience would want.

    --
    Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
    1. Re:It depends what sort of a user you are. by dariuscardren · · Score: 0

      I messed w/ an earlier version, the only major Issue I had was that they tried ot get you to use CNR for everythign, thoug seeing as it debian based, i tended to use atp-get for installing software, I liked the simple install, it was easier than any otehr linux distro or any os since MS-DOS you jsut choose where you want ot install it dose the rest.

    2. Re:It depends what sort of a user you are. by CyricZ · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Indeed, the installation program is a real gem. I was hoping that PC-BSD would be as easy to install. Unfortunately, the installer crashed.

      --
      Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
    3. Re:It depends what sort of a user you are. by despisethesun · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'll back this statement up. Linspire 4.5 was the distro I set up on my brother and dad's computers so that they wouldn't call me all the time about viruses/spyware. I found the whole thing quite limiting and personally use FreeBSD and Ubuntu, but for what they use their computers for Linspire "just works" and that's enough for them.

      --
      This poo is cold.
    4. Re:It depends what sort of a user you are. by Burz · · Score: 1

      I found the whole thing quite limiting

      I've seen this off-hand comment before, and it sounds like the PC users who claim OS X is "limiting".

      In what way is Linspire limiting?

      No one is going to break a fingernail setting up sources.list if they want to expand their horizons. Is it going to kill a power user if they have to apt-get some additional packages they're accustomed to having?

      I am tired of eye-candy-coated free distros that can't even remember the Windows domain password you typed in 15 min ago when you go to print something over the network. Or that expect people to wade through tons of library and utility packages to discern an acutal user-facing application. Or that don't have support for browser plugins and rtsp/mms protocols setup.

      Eye-candy != Ease of use

      Ease of use != Constraints

    5. Re:It depends what sort of a user you are. by despisethesun · · Score: 1

      Actually, Apt can break compatibility with Linspire's proprietary CNR software installer. Not a problem for most people (and CNR is a great tool for most of them) but since CNR lacks a lot of great apps that a geek like me would use, it's a bit of a deal breaker. Also, Linspire doesn't come with any tools for building from source (but they're available through CNR). Again, not a problem for the market they're aiming for but it's a deal breaker if an app I need only comes in a source tarball, and it makes it a huge pain to compile a custom kernel. It's not as infinitely configurable as most free distros either, unless you don't mind breaking or removing most of what makes Linspire what it is. I don't give a shit about eye candy, I just like to have full control of my machine and so Linspire is not for me. For people who don't like to play around with their computer as much, it's a great distro. The only "support" call I've gotten from either my brother or dad was when a power outage fried my brother's hard drive. No virus calls, no "my computer is slow, what's wrong?", no nothing. It "just works" for what they use it for and that's good enough.

      --
      This poo is cold.
  27. Deviantart has done this before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The digital art site, deviantart.com, had advertising from lindows offering 4.5 for free download way back when.

  28. The system.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is down.

  29. First, next by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 2, Interesting
    First Opera.

    Now Linspire.

    Can Microsoft be far behind?

    After all, nothing kills piracy like free software.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
    1. Re:First, next by hobbesx · · Score: 1
      Can Mircrosoft be far behind?


      I've still got 23 floppies with a zip-spanned copy of Outlook 98 that was given away for free a number of years ago. Now if only I had a computer with a floppy drive...

      --
      This rating is Unfair ( ) ( ) Fair (*) Funny
      Sigh... If only. Modding would be so much more fun.
    2. Re:First, next by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe in Intelligent Design. It was all done by Benevolent Space Aliens. How else can you explain Tom Cruise?

      so THAT'S what BSA stands for!

    3. Re:First, next by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe they started first...

      Gates shed some light on his own hard-nosed business philosophy. "Although about 3 million computers get sold every year in China, but people don't pay for the software," he said. "Someday they will, though. As long as they are going to steal it, we want them to steal ours. They'll get sort of addicted, and then we'll somehow figure out how to collect sometime in the next decade."

      http://news.com.com/2100-1023-212942.html?legacy=c net

    4. Re:First, next by digitalderbs · · Score: 1

      Can Microsoft be far behind?

      If they did, would you want it?

    5. Re:First, next by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 1

      I have a bookmark folder named "Evil assholes"
      I just put that link in there.
      I knew Gate$ was evil incarnate but this is even lower than I thought he could go.

      Bill Gate$ lives in a tunnel he burrowed under a pile of whale shit in The Marianas trench...

      Thanks..

  30. How long does the license last? by MTO_B. · · Score: 1

    I think this would be interesting to know...
    How long does the license last?
    Till next version comes?
    A year?

    Obvioussly it's "free" right now, but when will they start charging for upgrades?

  31. Simply free by MrJozef · · Score: 1

    > Simply go to purchase the $49.95 digital edition, > and then enter coupon code 'freespire' to receive > a $49.95 discount. Yeah, that amounts to $49.95 - $49.95 = $0.00. Why not just give it away for free then? I guess when you see the words 'simply' and 'free', you should be on the lookout for a complicated way to pump cash around.

    1. Re:Simply free by JonasH · · Score: 1

      Presumably because they already have the "coupon" system in place, and this is easier to do, and seems more generous to the user ("Wow! They're giving me something worth $49.95!").

      There's no cash pumping involved at all - I'm not sure what you're insinuating here. You simply put this thing in your shopping basket, enter the code, and checkout a $0.00 order. No cash involved.

    2. Re:Simply free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      pump cash around... sounds a lot like the rebates we see on computers at Office Depot, Compusa, others.

    3. Re:Simply free by TheStonepedo · · Score: 1

      Would the company be eligible for tax compensation? I know if I give my old but useable sweaters to the Salvation Army I am in no way required to mend them after their purchase. I am able to take the fair value of my old sweaters as a tax deduction. Rather than a "marketing ploy" suggesting that the freespire users will eventually pay for subscription, could it not be an accounting trick to adjust end of year statistics?

      --
      I'll be your candy shop of infinite deliciousity if you'll be my discotheque of endless rump-shaking.
  32. daaaaaamn... by Sfing_ter · · Score: 1

    I picked the wrong day to update my iso collection...

    --
    A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing. Emo Philips
  33. Slashdot to the rescue! by minus9 · · Score: 4, Funny



    A freely available operating system for PCs. Why slashdot you've done it again!

    Whatever will you chaps come up with next.

    We dream of the day when telegrams may be sent around the world for the price of a local telephone call. God bless you technological pioneers and God speed to your radical new endeavours.

    I just noticed you say it's available in "digital form" too. Why I almost vommited my evening dose of laudenum in excitement.

    Once again slashdot has lowered me to the lowest form of wit.

    1. Re:Slashdot to the rescue! by Compaq_Hater · · Score: 1

      that was fucking hallarious !, man that was priceless MOD this ONE UP +5 Funny please :) CH

  34. Freespire by p0rnking · · Score: 1

    "The name Freespire, however, did create some confusion in the short time it was used. The name implies a "free" copy of Linspire, which of course it is not."

    Now isn't Linspire the linux formally known as Lindows that was taken to court all over the world by Microsoft because of the "confusion" in the name?

    As I can tell, he isn't making a fuss over the name freespire, but this is the exact thing he went to court over, trying to prove that there was no confusion with the name Lindows and Windows.

    I do realize that there is a little bit of a difference between a linux distro that has a name that coincidentally sounds like Windows, and a linux distro that has a name that coincidentally sounds like a free version of another linux distro.

    To say that that in the first case, Linux and Windows are totally different is true, however, Lindows wasn't just another linux distro, it was designed to look a lot like Windows (default wallpaper, start menu ...) and was directly aimed at new Windows' users.

    1. Re:Freespire by cybersaga · · Score: 2, Informative

      From what I understand, the confusion between Lindows and Windows was hypothetical. Microsoft took them to court over the possibility that it would confuse the user.

      In this case, it was actually confusing users. If you read the old Freespire site, the author explains the confusions that were going on and why he decided to change the name. There was no force from Linspire to change the name.

    2. Re:Freespire by oh_bugger · · Score: 1

      a name that coincidentally sounds like Windows I heard the Lindows/Linspire people were thoroughly shocked when Microsoft informed them (via their lawyers) of the similarities

      --
      Go home and shave your giant head of smell with your bad self
    3. Re:Freespire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now isn't Linspire the linux formally known as Lindows

      No, they're formally known as Linspire. Although they were formerly known as Windows...

    4. Re:Freespire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean Lindows?

      Rule #1 of posts about spelling mistakes is that they include speling mistakes!

  35. Outstanding by Mad+Ogre · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I am a Linspire PC builder... and I love this OS. As far as Linux distros go, it might not be the "best" out there, but for Windows Refugees just turning to Linux - its perfect.

    --
    MadOgre.com
  36. Seems suspicious by Linegod · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Maybe its just me, but does anyone see this more in the light of 'In order to create confusion between Freespire and Linspire, we are releasing our own Freespire on the Linspire site, so the sheeple will believe we created it, and won't find out we suck'?

    --
    -- I care not for your foolish signatures.
    1. Re:Seems suspicious by leshert · · Score: 1

      Doubtful, given that the creator of Freespire had already changed the name before they started the publicity stunt.

      It's not the first time they've offered limited-time free downloads, either--they offered a "Linspire Developers' Edition" some time ago, in a similar way.

      It's just a way to drum up interest in their product. I don't see any deception in it.

  37. Free? Does it really matter? by bogaboga · · Score: 1
    Linspire is free? I doubt it even matters now since Linspire, like other distros, has always been freely available on the eDonkey network.

    One thing I like about it is that apart from being Debian based, and therefore easier to manage as compared to rpm based distros, it's one distro that is beautiful (especially the fonts), and has everything about it working *as* advertised - out-of-the-box.

  38. Indeed, those are the types of users targeted. by CyricZ · · Score: 1

    Yes, exactly. It is meant for new Linux users, or those who are not interested in becoming Linux gurus. New/common users are its target audience, of course.

    --
    Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
  39. Re:Emily is way better than Katrina by CyricZ · · Score: 1

    She looks like she's made of plastic.

    --
    Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
  40. Synaptic vs CNR by ilyaaohell · · Score: 2, Informative

    There's a very clear difference to casual computer users between dealing with these two screens:

    Synaptic
    Click-n-Run

    --
    UNIX: A computer user is defined as a programmer. WINDOWS: A computer user is defined as a consumer.
    1. Re:Synaptic vs CNR by genooma · · Score: 1

      funny, my synaptic looks more like this.
      Anyone new to linux would find it cleaner and easier than click and run.

    2. Re:Synaptic vs CNR by ilyaaohell · · Score: 1

      One man's "cleaner and easier" is another man's "barren and boring". It's the geeks who go for minimalism in GUIs. Casual users would sacrifice SOME usability if it meant a more pleasant, less utilitarian experience.

      This is why Ubuntu, being based on Gnome, isn't nearly as popular among casual users as Mandriva or Linspire.

      --
      UNIX: A computer user is defined as a programmer. WINDOWS: A computer user is defined as a consumer.
  41. How about Findows then? by davidwr · · Score: 1

    The best of all worlds.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  42. Re:Rev'rund Jack-Suhhnnn by rooster9 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    right on.

  43. Torrent Here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
  44. Torrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Since the servers are pretty much crawling already, here's a link to the torrent

    1. Re:Torrent by gkhan1 · · Score: 1

      Thank you!

    2. Re:Torrent by IntergalacticWalrus · · Score: 1

      Many thanks. I did all of their (really overcomplicated) registration process, yet I don't see any download link on the "CD downloads" page.

    3. Re:Torrent by Bluey · · Score: 1

      To be fair to Linspire, their "really overcomplicated" registration process is pretty minimal compared to many other sites. All it asks for is name, email and password. That's it.

      Once you're done registering, it logs you in to your account where you should see on the main page:

      My Products
      Here you can download software products you just purchased on Linspire.com


      Surprisingly enough, this is what you click on to download the free copy of Linspire.

      The torrent's been crawling along for me though, I think I peaked a 4 KB/s.

    4. Re:Torrent by IntergalacticWalrus · · Score: 1

      It still doesn't show up for me (and yes I've looked evey sub-section under My products). But the link provided by the original poster works.

  45. French by rooster9 · · Score: 0, Troll

    Did you all hear? The French are our bitches!

  46. Torrents? by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Since its free, that shouldnt be a problem.

    Never looked at linspire ( even before the name change ), but if its free, why not?

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  47. Why use Linspire? by Mori+Chu · · Score: 1

    From what little knowledge I had of Linspire, it seemed their goal was to intentionally rip off the look and feel of other popular software. They had an "LTunes" media player whose GUI looked just like iTunes, for example. I actually think this isn't such a bad idea. Making a Linux that looks and feels familiar will appeal to some people.

    But I don't know much about Linspire under the hood. What sort of package management do they use? Which desktop environment? Does it do a lot of essential tasks "out of the box" like playing MP3s, DVDs, etc? How does it handle automatic software updates?

    Can anyone who actually uses Linspire comment on what are the nice features it has that should cause somebody to consider using it, over other distros like Fedora, Suse, and so on?

    1. Re:Why use Linspire? by mp3phish · · Score: 1

      I don't use it but I can comment on it.

      Linspire is a Debian based distrubtion using KDE as the desktop environment. It's packabe management system uses one just like debians. But it has the click-n-run shopping site which lets you shop for a program, pay for it, and then download and install it all automatically... just like a debian package would. It then helps you configure the software if it is needed. So basically they have a nice GUI frontend to apt-get and the repository.

      The nice thing about Linspire is that it comes with all the extras which you need in a linux box but you can't get by default: NVidia drivers, DVD Player software, and other important proprietary systems which are not available under the GPL or other free license.

      I think the Click n Run is the most innovative thing too. It is like shopping amazon.com for software, only you click it and its ready to run right there.. Like online shopping only you instantly have it installed when you buy it. No hard setup processes needed (all automatic just like debian)

      Linspire also changes a default debian and KDE desktop by making all the menus more manageable (like the start menu has categories and names of programs which are easy to understand like "text editor" rather than "Kate" or "word Processor" or "photo editor"... It also cleans up the icons on a default KDE install and makes sure that AA fonts and all the eye candy is turned on. It is just generally a more polished desktop system for people who don't want to have to learn all new terminology when they switch computer systems.

      --
      Your ignorance is infinitely greater than you realize.
    2. Re:Why use Linspire? by walders · · Score: 1

      I know I'm late to this (Saturday in the UK...why should I be up?)... ...I can't see any comments on speed of Linspire compared to others...all this eye candy stuff sounds expensive on processor power...

      I have a slow laptop that copes (just; most of the time) with Ubuntu...is Linspire even slower?

    3. Re:Why use Linspire? by mp3phish · · Score: 1

      I don't really know... But I imagine that it is faster than a default Debian KDE because they have paid programers tweaking their desktop. They both turn on eye candy (such as AA Fonts, transparency, etc.) but also use all the known tweaks in the KDE engine to boost performance...

      Since it ships with the nvidia drivers (won't help on your laptop probably) in most people's cases, the Linspire system would likely be faster by default.. though I don't know if it would be faster than a professionally-tweaked ubuntu or debian system...

      --
      Your ignorance is infinitely greater than you realize.
  48. Re:Emily is way better than Katrina by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, so does she, but I'd still hit it.

  49. But. by hungrygrue · · Score: 1

    you still would have to pay a subscription fee to access the package repository after a brief trial period. That isn't exactly free. Stick with Ubuntu - it will always be free and is a much better distro to begin with.

    1. Re:But. by Burz · · Score: 1

      Funny I always seem to notice these claims without anything to back them up.

      Ubuntu is not the paragon of integtration or user-friendliness. If you can't get on the web and just expect plugins and multimedia protocols AND codecs to work, then aint no spartan, drab desktop theme gonna make things 'simple'.

  50. It could be worse. by Mal-2 · · Score: 2, Funny

    It could be written in Perl. Try reading THAT over the phone.

    Mal-2

    --
    How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
    1. Re:It could be worse. by BitHive · · Score: 0

      What about assembly? That would be horrible to read over the phone! We should do away with that cryptic crap.

    2. Re:It could be worse. by emandres · · Score: 1

      I agree, we'll all write kernels and bootloaders in something easy like BASIC... **Cringe**. But seriously, I think reading a perl regex over the phone would be way worse than 'add eax to eax then jump to the label foo, etc'

      --
      The only way to tell the difference between a hamster and a gerbil is that the hamster has more white meat.
    3. Re:It could be worse. by jlarocco · · Score: 4, Funny

      No, what would be worse is naming all the variables and functions things like "plus", "times", "leftParen", "greaterThan", "rightBracket"...:

      if (leftParen >= (plus + lessThan(minus) + lessThan * plus )) {
      ...

    4. Re:It could be worse. by flatface · · Score: 2, Funny

      ...What about the graphics?

      "Pixel 1,1 is #FFFFFF.
        Pixel 1,2 is #FFFFFF.
        Pixel 1,3 is #FFFFFF." ...

    5. Re:It could be worse. by chazwatson · · Score: 1

      If only I had mod points left. NICE

    6. Re:It could be worse. by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Simple: Write a script-fu for The GIMP which produces that image, then read that on the phone.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    7. Re:It could be worse. by ScrappyLaptop · · Score: 1
      Now that's pretty slick, Slick. I can actually envision some of my more bitter coworkers deciding that from this day on, since no one looks at their precious code anyway, they will write everything in "jlarocco notation"!

      The funny thing is, you don't need to say it out loud to get the effect: as you read, your own mind starts to substitute a symbolic "+" for "plus" and vice-versa and you really lose track of the variables quickly -try it with a larger example! It's even better if you can often put the variable GreaterThan right before a less-than operator, a PlusPlus variable right before a minus operator, etc...what a great April Fool's day prank for a code review.

      Thank you, jlarocco, for the chuckle.

    8. Re:It could be worse. by Minuo · · Score: 1
      --
      --minuo
    9. Re:It could be worse. by idonthack · · Score: 1

      The optional AP Computer Science exams they give at my school allow you to use any names you wish for your variables, classes, and methods.

      I am so taking them this year.
      ---
      What subliminal message?
      Generated by SlashdotRndSig via GreaseMonkey

      --
      Why is it that when you believe something it's an opinion, but when I believe something it's a manifesto?
  51. I'm using linspire 5.0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Linspire is a good DESKTOP operating system. If you use Linux on the pc or laptop computer it is the best for what it does.

    The company isn't bad as the technical/Linux community think. They have a good marketing department, but clearly have not targeted us. That doesn't mean the operating system isn't perfect for this audiance. I use it and the company is learning and constantly improving it.

    They lowered the price, which is a good start. They ARE listening. $20 a year for basically maintaining a non-free version of debian archives which includes alot of commercial software. The $50 license is actually Linux friendly since it doesn't limit the number of computers you can install it on (within your family).

    Could it be more Linux freindly? Probably not. You can't target the average user and expect then to donate or contribute funds. SuSe has released a free version, and I think Linspire could do this too at some point but untill they get off the ground and have Linux users or average users purchasing CNR subscriptions it won't happen. You have to make money somehow!

  52. Offtopic? by Poromenos1 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    my browser only supports analog downloads.

    Versus DIGITAL downloads (in the article). Why are mods so quick to mod people down? Hell, I don't mind seeing that comment, was it so bad that he HAD to be modded down? I know this isn't going to change anything, but people, only mod down when there's something you feel is very unacceptable, not one-liners that seem offtopic.

    --
    Send email from the afterlife! Write your e-will at Dead Man's Switch.
  53. A Software Subscription Rant by RiotXIX · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Thought this would be a good post to air out my views on Software firms charging subscriptions for software (no sure linspire does this, but I know Opera & the OSS drivers do).

    I whole heartedly agree with paying for software which I use on a regular basis/prefer, but would great software manufacturers PLEASE stop forcing the loyal users to have their money leeched away for the REST OF THEIR LIVES for the 'priviledge' of being allowed bug fixes/updates?!!

    All this does is turn away users (like it did with me, Norton, and probably opera once my educational license expires..). Sofware should be a One-time fee in 'most' cases (maybe vital server software for administrators/companies..but not for casual home user applications)...I would like to know that I can leave a box for 50 years, come back to it at some later point, and just update without having to shell out my credit card - it's just a form of making a system obselete, and it's not very respectful to people who use your software out of all the competition. Also, I can see hypothetically (or perhaps paranoidly) that sofware manufacturers will just keep old bugs until the next Subscription update as a form of forcing people to upgrade of face extreme viral consequences (I've heard people accuse Microsoft of doing this). IT IS NOT COOL, AND MAKES PEOPLE HESITANT TO GET TRAPPED WITH YOUR SOFTWARE.

    Like I said, this is not particularly aimed at Linspire (an OS is clearly a 'major app'), but is still applicable.

    --
    "You know you don't act like a scientist, you're more like a game show host." Dana Barret
    1. Re:A Software Subscription Rant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Come down to earth: Opera has been very good about their "subscriptions": My Opera ver.6 license still works on 7.x and 8.x. Opera vers 2.x-4.x IIRC allowed us poverty-stricken to uninstall and reinstall every thirty days (or uses) -- free.

      For the ethically challenged, the Opera advert bar is very small and a short line in /etc/hosts or c:/windows/hosts (depending on OS) will kill the ads as well.

      I DO agree with you, though, with respect to proprietary file formats....just not browsers and OSes.

    2. Re:A Software Subscription Rant by owlstead · · Score: 1

      There is a difference between releasing new software and bugfixes/security fixes. The first one I have no problem paying for (although I'd rather not). The second one I have a big problem with, since bugfixes are fixes on something that should have worked to begin with, and the second one poses a security risks. I also abhor companies that make hundreds of tiny changes and charge for that, new versions (for which you should pay for) should be significantly different from the previous versions.

      Anyway I am happily running a lot of OS software on Windows on my client PC (including an X server) and running everything else on my Linux server. The only software I pay for are the OS (excluding MS office and everything else) and entertainment. That way I don't need Linspire - which is good, since most copies don't equal the original.

    3. Re:A Software Subscription Rant by srstoneb · · Score: 1

      Thought this would be a good post to air out my views on Software firms charging subscriptions for software (no sure linspire does this, but I know Opera & the OSS drivers do).

      I would like to know that I can leave a box for 50 years, come back to it at some later point, and just update without having to shell out my credit card

      Huh? You're saying that if you don't get free updates for all time that it amounts to a "subscription"? That's insane. A subscription would be if the software stops working unless you pay for it, not that the technology you paid for might become obsolete in five or ten years.

    4. Re:A Software Subscription Rant by RiotXIX · · Score: 1

      No, I'm suggesting that I deem a piece of software to become unusable in the possible case that a major software vulnarability (especially if it's an application that accesses the internet) makes it inpractical to use. While I should have pointed out what the above user clarified, that I disagree with the concept of paying for bugfixes, I'll also willing to appreciate (as he also pointed out) that many pieces of software have a major code overhaul/rewrite, and they stop supporting the previous bit of software you paid $x for 2 years ago...

      of course, it's all relative to inidividual software (and I'm not targetting anyone specifically..), but you can see it in practice.

      --
      "You know you don't act like a scientist, you're more like a game show host." Dana Barret
  54. free? pfft. by WhitetailKitten · · Score: 1

    Linspire has been offered free before. They did a special offer to DeviantArt members (to try to get them away from TEH EVIL WIND0WZ) where they provided the current version of the time for free. But, unless they changed anything since I last used it, they've tried to steer their users as much as possible to their subscription-based Click'n'Run Warehouse. You pay a subscription fee of $60/year and have unlimited access to downloads of pretty much any program you could think of (like...telnet). I actually had to have a friend help me find the shell console the first time, so I could run ssh &etc without having to subscribe. I tried running apt-get and had to engage in some tweaking of config files (assisted by a linux guru) that I would've never known how to do, in order to use it. As shipped (when they were still Lindows), apt-get's config file was broken, pointing to non-existent Linspire servers. I cannot confirm if this is the case in Linspire 5.0 as I don't have a test box to install it on. So... it may be free, but unless you're tech savvy (like most of Slashdot), you're likely gonna get unnecessarily gouged for the convenience of doing it their way.

    1. Re:free? pfft. by One+Louder · · Score: 4, Informative
      They've recently created an entry-level CNR subscription - basically all the same thing as "full" but without free updates to the next version of the OS - for $20/year.

      The apt-get sources is still commented out in 5.0, but points to the standard Debian repositories. Two seconds in vi (ten in emacs) and you're in business if you can't find twenty bucks.

    2. Re:free? pfft. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      60 bucks a year isn't exactly being gouged now is it?

    3. Re:free? pfft. by WhitetailKitten · · Score: 1

      Nifty. I did not know that.

      And when I used it (3.0 I think?) the apt-get source wasn't commented out. It just pointed to a dead Lindows URL and that was all. (I had to bug a linux guru for the URL to a real apt-get server.) So, YMMV.

      I'm still a little wary of them. But, they did introduce me to crunchy Debian goodness, so it's not all terribly bad. I just need to get another box and a router so I don't have to rely on XP.

    4. Re:free? pfft. by WhitetailKitten · · Score: 1

      I nearly spent 60 bucks just so I could have ssh. That's all I wanted. The rest of the CNR warehouse could be chromed and come with minstrels singing my praises, for all I cared. That's a pretty hefty price, IMNSHO.

      And then I found the terminal and didn't have to worry about it. I was slightly less than impressed by CNR. Without that little bit of insight, I almost paid far too much for a free app already available in the box.

    5. Re:free? pfft. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blah... Just change your init to /bin/bash in your boot loader then download and install portage from http://www.gentoo.org/ then all you need to do is type "emerge system kde gnome" and you will be set to go

    6. Re:free? pfft. by WhitetailKitten · · Score: 1

      If I couldn't find the Terminal without assistance, what makes you think I'd have a clue how to do that?

      Lindows is designed to be easier than that. But it's a little too easy and luring.

  55. digital download only!??? by Daneurysm · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Crap... why can't it be available for analog download too?

    I really need a new computer...

    1. Re:digital download only!??? by owlstead · · Score: 1
  56. live? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is this able to be run like a livecd like knoppix or is it hdd install only?

  57. Torrent Storm by randomErr · · Score: 1

    It must be really bad. I can't even download it on Bit Torrent. Could this be a scaling issue for BT?

    --
    You say things that offend me and I can deal with it. Can you?
    1. Re:Torrent Storm by Phil246 · · Score: 1

      i doubt it. Torrents tend to get better the more people are on them, and im having no troubles downloading from it myself

  58. Linux is FREE anyways isn't it? by snotclot · · Score: 1

    I thought the premise of LINUX was that there was supposed to be a FREE version of each distro; this is a MUST..?!

    1. Re:Linux is FREE anyways isn't it? by kaschei · · Score: 1

      Just in case your comment is merely born of ignorance: The Linux kernel and most applications associated with Linux (just about all in the debian Free repositories) are released under the GPL. All versions of those, even ones with modifications you make or a corporation makes, have to be released and the license they're released under has to be the GPL. Commercial desktop distributions can use non-free, proprietary software if they obtain appropriate licenses; this software is not released under the GPL and thus there is no necessity that it be released, even if there is a version of Linux that comes bundled with that software. So yes, there is a "free version" of each distribution, but that version is going to lack the non-free components. Linspire's main selling point is that those non-free components are preconfigured to work with the OS, saving end users the necessity that they, god forbid, learn something about how their computer works! And also the massive headaches you can get trying to get sun's java to work with firefox on a debian release.

      --
      I should not talk so much about myself if there were anybody else whom I knew as well. -Henry David Thoreau
    2. Re:Linux is FREE anyways isn't it? by snotclot · · Score: 1

      Hi, thanks for this very helpful information. Yes, my original comment was born of ignorance :D

  59. Linspire has no problem... by ratta · · Score: 1

    with anyone using the open source code from our operating system. Really? You mean i can freely use KDE+Xorg+GNU/Linux? That's incredible!

    --
    Wondering why i am doing so strange posts? I am trying to get a "+5,Flamebait" or "-1,Insightful" rating.
  60. Re:Rev'rund Jack-Suhhnnn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    looks like some culinary snob has decided that this food is not good enough, because the bodies are black. You, Mr. Moderator, are a racer.

  61. Old News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Linspire has been free to download for months now. This report is old news.

  62. But hurry! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This offer is going to Lexpire soon!

  63. Torrent is working by cblguy · · Score: 1

    I'm d/l via this Torrent right now. Seems a little slow, but it's working...

  64. well, they do by zogger · · Score: 1

    I got one sitting right here, got it a month or two ago. My friend in town who has DSL downloaded it for me and burned it, and it came from their bit torrent link. free as in gratis. They offered it as the live cd version, but apparently you can install from it as well. You DON'T get the click n run access for free though, although this new one they are offering I guess you would. It's basically tweaked debian, kde desktop, lotsa smoothing and tweaking.

  65. Torrents are crawling by Soloact · · Score: 2, Informative

    Am on cable internet connection, but the torrent is crawling, slower than when I had dialup (just a few days ago). Where are all the seeders/re-seeders? I'm doing my part by re-seeding, c'mon everyone, please help out. Thank you! Cheers!

    1. Re:Torrents are crawling by pjy · · Score: 1

      10.3% done, 12:55 hours remaining.

    2. Re:Torrents are crawling by Soloact · · Score: 1

      Thanks, they started to speed up, but as I type this, I am at 21.1% done with 15:20 remaining. I'm sure it will speed up more with time, but it took several hours just to get to 1%. Made me wonder what was going on, as the Linspire site was slashdotted, means to me that a lot of folks had gotten the full download already. Cheers!

    3. Re:Torrents are crawling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had that problem last night. A scrape showed about 750+ seeds and 900 or so peers, but after leaving the computer on to download the torrent all last night and until early this evening, I still was only at 56.1% complete or so. I went back to the site, took my chances in the queue, and was only in line for about 15 minutes. The download itself was completed in under an hour.

  66. Re:Emily is way better than Katrina by CyricZ · · Score: 1

    No, she actually is made out of plastic.

    --
    Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
  67. servers too busy by Lil-Bondy · · Score: 0

    the slashdot effect is really annoying me right now, all of linspires servers are overloaded with the freespire thing, it seems i wont be able to get my version untill late, or, never... if that many people keep trying to download it, untill the 6th, im screwed

    --
    Anyone who is capable of getting themselves made President should on no account be allowed to do the job. - HHGTTG
  68. I Tried It by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1


    Well, I booted it as a live CD.

    First it gave me a Konqueror message that "/mnt/cdrom0 was not found." Okay, I can let that slide.

    And I admit it handled my old ViewSonic 6 monitor much better than most other distros do, including Knoppix. None of them get the horizontal sync right, and I have to tweak the X config. No surprise, it's an ancient monitor.

    Then I tried getting on the Net. This thing uses that stupid plug icon in the system tray. Tells you nothing but that you're not connected, but does have a button for starting up the network profile dialog.

    So I fire up the Control Center and try to set up the default network profile. Won't let me save the changes (after stupidly prompting me to) because I'm on a live CD - evidently it's not smart enough to change the active profile on the RAM disk or in memory or wherever the active profile is being held. It just says it can't "switch the active profile."

    Okay, the default was for my Broadcom onboard NIC. Frankly, I can't remember which one is the DSL NIC, so maybe it's the D-Link (I think I switched them the time I installed Mandrake 10.1). So I tried the D-Link interface - no go there, either. Since you can't save the active profile and you can't save to a live CD, if the interface is wrong, you're stuck with the command line. I'm not wasting any more time with it.

    So I send a rant to Linspire's support about how Knoppix seems to be the only distro able to simply detect my SBC DSL and get me on the Net in a minute, with a simple wizard.

    I submit the support comment - and get a bunch of error messages because their servers are hammered and nothing works on their site any more - supposedly - that's Robertson's excuse.

    So I send a similar rant to Mike from his blog. He responds that I must have a unique hardware situation. Well, no, I don't - I have a vanilla AMD-based clone with standard NICs, and nothing has been unsupported from Red Hat 7.3 on.

    He says saving to a live CD would be a problem.

    Duh. So how come Knoppix can set my config up?

    Bottom line: Linspire fails the Net test. If a new user can't get on the Net in five minutes, the distro goes. When I upgraded from Red Hat 7.3 a while back, I first put on Fedora Core 3. It failed the same test. Mandrake 10.1 succeeded with somewhat less futzing around.

    Linspire (and Fedora - and every other distro that can't do this) needs to revamp their Net connection methods to do what Knoppix does - scan the NICs (ALL of them, not stop on the first one), detect the PPPoE concentrator, and configure the system for a DSL connection, including user id and password for the ISP - which should be the only thing the user really needs to say, that and yes I use the ISP's DHCP.

    This isn't rocket science, geeks. Find out how Knoppix does it, and then ALL OF YOU DO IT LIKE THAT. Stop this "Not Invented Here" bullshit.

    --
    Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    1. Re:I Tried It by Dissectional · · Score: 1
      Every install of Fedora I've done has seen me connect to the net seconds within logging in for the first time.

      Your 'next' and 'finish' clicking skills need to be worked on.

    2. Re:I Tried It by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1


      Just because you have a system that Fedora can see doesn't mean everybody does - even though mine is a vanilla clone with all supported hardware.

      Your reasoning skills need working on.

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    3. Re:I Tried It by oscarh · · Score: 1

      do not use this stupid distro with a multi-boot machine unless you want to overwrite partition 0 - it doesn't seem to want to install anywhere else. Stupid Robertson, trying so hard to be like Windows that he even duplicates the mistakes.

      --
      OK, oscar
    4. Re:I Tried It by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1


      Interesting. I'm glad I only tried it in the live CD mode.

      This is truly idiotic, since any Linux distro can be installed anywhere. It emphasizes what I told Robertson in my email - that his geeks need to stop doing "Not Invented Here" and do it like the other distros do it.

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  69. Linspire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I purchased a 2CD version from Tiger Direct for $19.The second CD is just a come on for CNR but is not necessary for installation. It came with a registration # but I was never asked to register it and have not done so. It is great for beginners but it tends to steer you toward CNR. I haven't used CNR and have installed several programs myself, no differently than other distros. I've tried SUSE, Mandrake and Ubuntu but none of them ever worked properly (Ubuntu wouldn't install properly at all). Linspire is the only one that worked right from the start and I recommend it to anyone who just wants to get away from windows.

  70. servers busy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    perhaps the servers will be "busy" until the 6th. Could just be them redirecting traffic to the "Bad Request" Page and then it magically is fixed the 6th.

  71. Linspire builder? by Penguinoflight · · Score: 1

    I dont understand how this would be any different from doing another build? Build the box and load the OS, same way with Yoper, or even with slackware.

    --
    "And we have seen and do testify that the Father sent the Son to be the Savior of the World"
    1 John 4:14
    1. Re:Linspire builder? by vga_init · · Score: 1
      I agree. What does Linspire have to offer that's particularly special? The setup. The premade package is suitable for newbies.

      When you're the builder, however, you have the advantage of configuring linux on the box so that the home users don't have to. What this gets you is the option of using just about any distro you want and doing the special add-ins and tweaks--that is to say, be you own Linspire.

      Why do this? Simple. You can build a better system than Linspire did because you know *your* customers better than they do. You can dish out more of what they want and less of what they don't.

  72. dang.. by Kuku_monroe · · Score: 1

    i wonder if i'll be able to get it before the 6th..

    --
    //WR
  73. Does my cock taste rancid? by Rogerborg · · Score: 0

    Why don't you come suck it and see?

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  74. Ummm by Rogerborg · · Score: 0, Troll
    > Why should they expect to use something as complex as a computer while having no knowledge of what happens inside of them?

    Maybe because they're not virgins who live in their parents' basement, and want to use a computer rather than maintain one. Dell, HP, IBM and, uh, Apple are doing pretty well out of selling computers + operating systems and software that just work.

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    1. Re:Ummm by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      Wrong accusation, wrong guy. I have photographic proof that I'm not a virgin.

      How about you?

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  75. Licensing? by grolschie · · Score: 1

    What is the licensing for this? I tried looking on the site. Once I've downloaded, how many pcs can I install on? Or do I have to get multiple licenses?

  76. Linspire by mattox · · Score: 1

    its not such a bad distro, most normal non-techies would pay for something like it something that just works. It's got everything you need included for movies, music and chat which is pretty much everything people like my brother and sister are after.

  77. But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  78. Damn shame... by mliikset · · Score: 1

    I always thought that number of uninstalls would be a better indicator of quality.

  79. Thanks but... by TarryTops · · Score: 0

    Umm no thanks. Too much free stuff floating around. If you can;t sell then you ought to close your shop and do goat herding. Don't just go "free"ing your stuff.

    --
    Java Oracle Linux Enthusiast
  80. No you didn't. by Burz · · Score: 1

    The article is about the installable, full version of Linspire.

    This isn't rocket science, geeks.

    And you not even willing to pull up a CLI. Hmmm, I doubt Linspire will be paying you to have these changes made.

    1. Re:No you didn't. by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1


      Look, rocket scientist, I have Mandrake 10.1 on my system. I don't particularly need Linspire at all. I was merely testing it in live CD mode to see what the current version looked like and how it behaved, particularly from the point of view of a naive user since that's who this distro is intended for.

      If it doesn't pass the Net test, it isn't adequate.

      That simple.

      As for the rest of your comments, shove them deep into your anus.

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  81. the case was different by Tharald · · Score: 1

    The whole argument of the Lindows case was that MS had gotten the trademark for a generic word used to describe the type of system they were selling*. This should not be possible, and thus the whole Windows name was kinda iffy. That is why MS made a deal with Lindows, who on their side milked the whole issue for pr and money. Personally I wish Lindows had stuck with it and gone all the way.

    * It is a bit like trademarking the word "car" for a car product after the word had been established as meaning what it does, and then suing other companies for using the word "car" in their name. it should not happen under trademark law.

  82. Suicide by Slashdot? by Garwulf · · Score: 1

    Is this some new way of killing a server? Suicide by Slashdot?

    I guess it would be a bit like suicide by cop...

    --
    Robert B. Marks
    Author, Demonsbane in Diablo Archive
  83. Pretty cool, but Im not ditching my Mac by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As far as linux goes, its pretty nice. The live distro booted fairly well on a 4-year old Toshiba laptop. Meanwhile, as i posting this comment from said laptop, my iBook is installing it on Virtual PC so i can test something other than the live version. i tried it back when it was Lindows. its been improved since then, and im fairly impressed. but i wont ditch the usability and simplicity of my beautiful mac.

  84. A tip for "buying" Linspire... by Datoyminaytah · · Score: 2, Informative

    The servers are very busy. When you are in the process of going through several screens to "buy" Linspire for "free" with the coupon code, very often you will be redirected to a "busy" page. Refreshing the page will not resubmit your request, it simply refreshes the "busy" page, so very often you have to start over. Sometimes you can go "back" to the previous screen and try again, and sometimes going "back" just sends you to the "busy" page. So...

    On every page where you have to continue, check whether the link can be opened in a new window/tab. Some steps can, some can't. Open the next step in a new window/tab if you can. If it comes up "busy" just close it and try again from the previous screen that is still in its own window/tab. Repeat this until you are done.

    --
    assert(birth_date<time-86400)
    1. Re:A tip for "buying" Linspire... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "There are currently 254 people in line to download."

      Pretty popular stuff here! Now, thanks to the "World's easiest desktop Linux!", I may now be shielded from the complexities of Linux, all without the annoying tinfoil hat.

  85. Re:Rev'rund Jack-Suhhnnn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You seem to be missing the concept of racism. It works both ways. Maybe there were no 'black people' that were available to take the postions of power; maybe the people who were chosen were the best. New Orleans has PEOPLE in it, and PEOPLE are in charge of recovery. Your comment is more racist than anything I have seen in recent times.

  86. Linspire for a penny by beforewisdom · · Score: 1

    I was at microcenter yesterday.

    I bought two copies of Linspire for 1 cent each.

    It didn't say on the box what version it was other than "OEM Edition".

    It is probably an older version, but at 1 cent per copy I couldn't help picking up two.

    I think I may leave one at work as an incentive for the windows users to take it home and give a try.

  87. This article is dangerous by hahafaha · · Score: 1

    We will ruin it for everyone. Not only will this Slashdot Linspire, it will also triple the amount of Linspire's available. Now ~67% will be aquired for free!