Slashdot Mirror


Review: Monarch Computer's Nemesis FX-57 7800 SLI Gaming

A couple weeks back now, I had the pleasure of testing and using Monarch Computer's Nemesis FX-57 8700 SLI Gaming machine. This model is a top-of-the-line gaming rig; I'm currently testing the Hornet machine as well. Read below for my take on the machine. One of the first things that should be acknowledged is that this version of the Nemesis is a very high end gaming machine. The price for the system that I had been testing was over $5000. There's the scary-fast base system itself, but then you throw on full THX surround sound, the customzied keyboard and mouse that Monarch produces - and while you are talking about top-dollar, you are also talking about top performance.

The system itself is as below:

Case: Thermaltake Custom Painted Shark Full Tower Aluminum Case Series w/Window (Fire Pearl)
View

Power Supply: Enermax Noisetaker EG701AX-VE-SFMA ATX 2.0 w/SLI Support 600W Power Supply

Motherboard: Asus A8N-SLI Premium nForce4 SLI Audio, GB-LAN, IEEE, USB, PCI-E, SATAII w/RAID, DDR-400, ATX
View

Processors: AMD Athlon 64 FX-57 (939)
View

Heat Sink: Zalman CNPS7000-CU Copper CPU Fan

Memory: 2 GB (4 pcs 512MB) DDR (400) PC-3200 Corsair w/LED Display (TWINX1024-3200XLPRO)

Hard Drives: 1 x Western Digital 74 GB SATA 10K Raptor (WD740GD), 2 x Western Digital Caviar SE 250 GB SATAII 16MB Cache 7200 RPM (WD2500KS)

RAID Setup: RAID 0 (Zero) Setup

DVD-RW: Plextor PX-716SA DVD±RW 16x8x16x DVD+RW 48x24x48x CD-RW SATA

Floppy: Mitsumi Floppy 7-in-1 USB Card Reader/Smart Media Drive (Black)

Video Cards: 2 x NVIDIA Geforce 7800 GTX 256MB GDDR3, VIVO/, Dual-DVI

Sound Card: Creative Labs Audigy 2 ZS Platinum INT Drive Sound

Wireless NIC: D-Link DWL-AG530 Tri-Mode Dualband (2.4/5GHz) Wireless 108Mbps PCI Adapter

Industry Standard Upgradable

USB Ports on front of case

6 Month Warranty - Free tech support
View

All Monarch PCs include: 48-72 hr. Burn-in Diagnostic (to ensure all components are malfunction free); Latest BIOS, drivers, and tested patches installed (All drivers are also included on CD); award-winning assembly and installation including tie-off on all cables (for improved airflow); final 62-point inspection by Intel and AMD Certified Technicians, and Free Unlimited Phone Support. All manuals, disks, cables and other accessories included with your retail components will be included with your system.

As is fairly obvious, the machine's specs are pretty hardcore. In doing some of the standard testing, the system turned out a 3DMark05 test of 13,002 whichout missing a beat. Similarly, the Sysmark04 score was a studly 225. To be blunt, I don't think I've ever seen those types of numbers before - in real life, that is.

What was even more impressive for me at least was the machine's ability to handle that most important of tasks - playing games. Playing Doom 3, with all graphic options cranked (including the console accessible ones) this machine still turned out a 80.2 FPS. Turning off the console options, and just going in ultra-mode had a frame rate of 87.3, sustained. My other gaming obessions, World of Warcraft (Props to Ajul-Nerub server!) managed to turn in a more paltry 77.3 FPS, but given the fact that you are often depending on your connection with WoW for some of that, that's pretty amazing. DivX encoding was also quite fast - 1574 seconds on the sample size that I used.

The more subtle touch on the machine was evident as well - you can open the thing up from multiple angles, with a swing front door on it, and the lighting was handled nicely. And given the machine's power and draw, I was fairly impressed with the noise from the various fans. The heat output from the machine is fairly impressive; you'll not need that space heater in the room anymore in the winter time, but the actual heat inside of the machine case, and CPU always stayed well within manufacturer recommended ranges. While running the very high-end graphic testing of Doom 3, the temp did get some spikes, but nothing that was concerning. The nVidia 7800 duals make a huge difference.

One of the other features that I liked is the fast primary drive, and back-up, slower, but RAIDed drives. It's nice for installing high access demand apps on the primary, but using the other drives as storage drives. The other comment I would make, speaking as an obessive wire organizer, is that the machine itself ships very very nicely tied off cabling-wise. I think this looks nice, but also, I would suspect, makes a appreciable difference to the heat flow. One other important note is that they offer a 3 year 24/7 support plan - all warranties are different options, 'course.

In short, the machines rocks. The issue, of course, is the pricing - but if you are looking for a top end machine, this is a phenomenal rig. Monarch does a great job of supporting the product, with a great packet of documentation and information that comes with the machine, but also active forum postings and involvement from the tech support on their boards. Great company, great machine.

299 comments

  1. The Bare Minimum by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Funny

    [x] Memory: 2 GB [Check]
    [x] Processors: AMD Athlon 64 FX-57 (939) [Check]
    [x] Hard Drives: 1 x 74 GB SATA, 2 x 250 GB SATAII
    [x] Video Cards: 2 x NVIDIA Geforce 7800 GTX 256MB

    This extreme gaming platform should meet the minimum requirements to play Solitare under Windows Vista. For those planning on gaming on Vista, how much more muscle can you pack into this rig?

    The price for the system that I had been testing was over $5000.

    Ah, part of the TCO equation! But, heck, you should be able to buy this system for $3000 a year from now. Funny how this pricing reminds me of what it cost to have 1 PC XT with MS-DOS on it back in the mid-eighties.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:The Bare Minimum by supabeast! · · Score: 1

      "Ah, part of the TCO equation! But, heck, you should be able to buy this system for $3000 a year from now. Funny how this pricing reminds me of what it cost to have 1 PC XT with MS-DOS on it back in the mid-eighties."

      Computing for enthusiats has never been cheap ;)

    2. Re:The Bare Minimum by kollivier · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Ah, part of the TCO equation! But, heck, you should be able to buy this system for $3000 a year from now. Funny how this pricing reminds me of what it cost to have 1 PC XT with MS-DOS on it back in the mid-eighties.

      I can't see anyone truly concerned about money buying this box. I like games as much as the next guy (or gal), but I don't have $5000 to drop just to get a 'more hardcore rig', and I don't even see why I would need one. I mean, think about it - does a game really need to push your hardware to the very limit in order to be fun? Of course not. Game developers try to push the hardware just to see what they can do, and gamers buy these systems just to show off what their 'hardcore rig' can do. This is like a Porche for geeks. Well, actually, probably more like a heavily modded monster truck. ;) You don't buy it so much because you need what it does, you buy it because you want to show everyone else what it can do.

      I bet the Revolution is going to blow these boxes away in terms of fun-factor anyways, and it's probably going to be under $300. How's that for ROI? :)

    3. Re:The Bare Minimum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I disconcur. I've never had as much fun playing a game as I have playing Day of Defeat (PC). Ever. And with source coming out on my birthday (Valve really DOES love me!), it only gets better.

      But hey, if you're happy with using sex toys as controls for your game system, go for it. It's much better on your wallet :)

    4. Re:The Bare Minimum by madprof · · Score: 1

      With respect this is nothing like a Porsche or even a neat monster truck. If I buy a Porsche I'll get years of enjoyment from it. But I'm going to buy a better system than this in 2 years for under half the price.
      You are absolutely right when you say that nobody concerned with money would buy this machine.

    5. Re:The Bare Minimum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "This extreme gaming platform should meet the minimum requirements to play Solitare under Windows Vista. For those planning on gaming on Vista, how much more muscle can you pack into this rig?"

      Actually it doesn't. To get Vista in all it's full glory you'll need a Hardware Directx10 card which aren't out yet.

    6. Re:The Bare Minimum by MindStalker · · Score: 1

      Yea its more like buying an expensive car that runs some strange exotic fuel just so you can try out this new fuel. Luckily the car will still run the old fuel, though it may crash doing it :)

    7. Re:The Bare Minimum by bigman2003 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hmm...what is more fun- sex toys or office equipment?

      --
      No reason to lie.
  2. My favortie board by AKAImBatman · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Base Price: $4,589.00

    Holy CRAP that's expensive! And that's (apparently) without the monitor! If I may suggest, you should be able to build the same machine for about half the price, perhaps a bit more.

    Asus A8N-SLI Premium nForce4

    Sweet! They chose my favorite board! I have the A8N-E board (same thing, but only one Vid card) and I must say that it is a VERY nice board. Practically everything you could ever want is built in. NForce4 chipset, Gigabit ethernet, PCI Express, 8 channel audio, 10 USB ports, hardware firewall, hardware RAID support, 4 SATA-300 (aka SATA-II) connectors, IDE support, nearly all AMD64 chips supported, etc. I haven't found a better board, especially in that price range!

    Sound Card: Creative Labs Audigy 2 ZS Platinum INT Drive Sound

    Can anyone explain what is up with this? The board comes with 8 channel sound built in. What do you need a separate sound card for? Is the sound quality really that much better?

    BTW, if you get the A8N board, don't get the ASUS Star ICE. I've got one of those things and I'm now using it as a desk ornament. I just wanted an extra fan to keep things cool. I had no idea that I'd get a friggin' JET ENGINE! (I'm not kidding either. This thing can barely fit in the case when installed.) It gets great comments from my coworkers though. "What the HELL is that!?" ;-)

    If you don't believe me on its size (no one ever does) just look at this pic.

    1. Re:My favortie board by Gulthek · · Score: 1

      Creative Labs Audigy 2 ZS Platinum INT Drive Sound

      Because it makes their copy sound cooler, thus increasing the price they can overcharge.

    2. Re:My favortie board by Sduic · · Score: 2, Informative

      Integrated sound is going to require more CPU time. If you can offload it to a card, you can leave the processor for more important things.

      --
      *this space intentionally left blank
      "One of the four pointers saying 'come and see', and I saw, and beheld a white
    3. Re:My favortie board by AKAImBatman · · Score: 2, Informative

      I thought that's what the built-in RealTek ALC850 chip was supposed to do?

      Speaking of which, DO NOT install the nForce drivers under Linux! They are WAY out of date and will just screw stuff up. Just get the latest version of non-Kernel ALSA and you should be fine. The ethernet is already supported.

      The GeForce drivers should work without a hitch, though.

    4. Re:My favortie board by iainl · · Score: 2, Informative

      One of the guys at work brought his in because he didn't want it any more (replaced it with something smaller that still did the job). It's huge, but more importantly to me it weighs an absolute ton! There's no way I'd want something that heavy hanging on to the motherboard like that; I'd be too worried about it stressing the material to damaging point.

      In fact, it's so heavy I'd be worried about the damage it could do to all the AGP and PCI cards on the way down as it broke off, too.

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
    5. Re:My favortie board by thrift24 · · Score: 1

      By physically moving the sound device onto a card, how do you expect to offload CPU usage?

      The onboard card and the sound blaster both still need to connect to the PCI bus. Where they are physically connected makes no difference. There will probably be no difference in CPU usage if your using either of these cards. The real difference in CPU usage will depend on how many extra apps they load onto your machine.

    6. Re:My favortie board by Malc · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately this is a Creative Labs product so the CPU gained is going to be lost processing other things unnecessarily installed on the system. Based on my experience of their drivers and software over the years, the whole system will also be more unstable.

    7. Re:My favortie board by Sduic · · Score: 1

      Hmm...I haven't kept tabs on integrated sound tech. Has it gone beyond AC'97 codecs then?

      --
      *this space intentionally left blank
      "One of the four pointers saying 'come and see', and I saw, and beheld a white
    8. Re:My favortie board by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I built a comparable system about six months ago, using 6800GTs instead (the 7800 wasn't out then, but the price I paid then was close). My system is also watercooled.

      Grand Total using pricewatch and mail-order: $2,200.

      Save yourself $3000 and build it yourself, folks.

    9. Re:My favortie board by ltwally · · Score: 1, Insightful
      "Sound Card: Creative Labs Audigy 2 ZS Platinum INT Drive Sound

      Can anyone explain what is up with this? The board comes with 8 channel sound built in. What do you need a separate sound card for? Is the sound quality really that much better?"

      I'll take a stab at answering that question:

      Anyone serious about either audio or gaming adds a dedicated sound card. And a good one (ie. audigy2 or better). Your onboard 8-channel sound is a minimal solution, and offers very little hardware acceleration, making it subpar for gaming. (What gamer wants 5-10% of the cpu's attention to be stuck on doing audio, when a good sound blaster can drop that to 0-3%) Also of consideration is audio quality; as a basic rule-of-thumb, onboard audio is going to be built using lower quality DAC's and other components. The signal-to-noise ratio isn't going to be stellar, and is thus not suitable for serious audio enthusiasts.

      In short, onboard sound may be fine for listening to mp3's on your computer speakers, and may even be good enough for those that only play occasional games... but no serious geek would consider onboard audio as a replacement for a decent soundcard.. especially when you can get a basic Audigy2 for under $50.

      Not to be rude... but your lack of knowledge about computer hardware makes your suggestions moot. Not that the other components you mention are bad.. it's just that it's hard to take your recommendations seriously when you display a lack of basic knowledge about hardware. Please refrain from making recommendations until you are better versed in the subject.
      --



      /dev/random
    10. Re:My favortie board by EzInKy · · Score: 1


      Unfortunately this is a Creative Labs product so the CPU gained is going to be lost processing other things unnecessarily installed on the system. Based on my experience of their drivers and software over the years, the whole system will also be more unstable.


      I've never really had any problems with the emu10k1 drivers, they just pretty much seem to work. It's been especially nice now that they are part of the kernel and installing alsa-libs and alsa-utils have never caused my sytem to be unstable. What kind of instablities have you been experiencing?

      --
      Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
    11. Re:My favortie board by the+unbeliever · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Anyone serious about either audio or gaming adds a dedicated sound card. And a good one (ie. audigy2 or better). Your onboard 8-channel sound is a minimal solution, and offers very little hardware acceleration, making it subpar for gaming. (What gamer wants 5-10% of the cpu's attention to be stuck on doing audio, when a good sound blaster can drop that to 0-3%) Also of consideration is audio quality; as a basic rule-of-thumb, onboard audio is going to be built using lower quality DAC's and other components. The signal-to-noise ratio isn't going to be stellar, and is thus not suitable for serious audio enthusiasts.


      You obviously haven't been keeping up with onboard sound tech. SoundStorm provides full hardware acceleration (and dolby digital encoding in real time) in 5.1 surroud, and even provides optical out. Even your basic RealTek chip will please anyone but the most picky audiophile. All of this and you don't even lose many, if any at all, cpu cycles since there are DSP's involved.

      Also, Creative's drivers are notorious for sucking unnecessary CPU time, so your 0-3% estimate is way off.
    12. Re:My favortie board by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've always found the entire "onboard audio is teh suck!1!" crowd to be quite silly. A company could take an Audigy 2 and hardwire it to the PCI bus on a motherboard (giving the exact same functional result as adding a PCI Audigy 2), and you guys would still sit there saying "buy a separate card because the onboard audio is teh suck!!1"

    13. Re:My favortie board by ferat · · Score: 1

      I'm sure he meant on windows. Nothing wrong with the hardware, and alsa is swell for linux, but on windows creaf installs a TON of misc addons and about 4 different mixers and auto updaters and sound editor demos and all sorts of other crap that invariably has a negative effect on system stability.

      You can avoid MOST of it by doing a custom install, but not everything.

    14. Re:My favortie board by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a total wanker!

    15. Re:My favortie board by AKAImBatman · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Not to be rude... but your lack of knowledge about computer hardware makes your suggestions moot.

      Nice. I hate to break it to you, but some of us do not consider the sound to be that important of a component. For those of us who aren't audiophiles, Dobly 5.1 using built-in sound is more than enough. (And the nForce4 chipset is no slouch like the sound installed on the Intel boards.) However, I do realize that there are audiophiles out there who *do* care. That's why I asked about the extra sound card.

      As for my other suggestions, the components I recommended are some of the best tradeoffs between price and performance in my experience. Or as you say, "the components aren't bad". I could suggest that everyone build a $3000 machine + $3000 super-hires television. But does everyone need that? No! They'd much rather have a complete home entertainment system + PC for around $2000 - $2500. They simply don't have the extra budget for the higher end components.

      Those that know they want better components are not likely to take my suggestions because they already know what they want. That's fine. My suggestions are only a guideline for building a high-quality system for a reasonable price. My apologies for not being an "uber-leet" audiophile such as yourself.

    16. Re:My favortie board by EzInKy · · Score: 1


      I'm sure he meant on windows. Nothing wrong with the hardware, and alsa is swell for linux, but on windows creaf installs a TON of misc addons and about 4 different mixers and auto updaters and sound editor demos and all sorts of other crap that invariably has a negative effect on system stability.


      Thanks, I really didn't know that. Seems like such a stupid thing to go and piss off people who have already bought your product instead of just making sure it does what it is supposed to do so they and their friends will buy from you again. I'll be sure to steer any Window's users away from them then.

      --
      Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
    17. Re:My favortie board by ALpaca2500 · · Score: 4, Informative

      the real answer to why it has an Audigy 2 ZS is that the audigy supports EAX 4, which a lot of games use for positional audio, to take the strain off the CPU and boost performance.

    18. Re:My favortie board by Breogan · · Score: 0

      You obviously haven't been keeping up with onboard sound tech. SoundStorm has been only integrated in nForce2 boards and the most recent boards using nVidia chipsets use Realtek (650 or 850) chips, which don't offer hardware acceleration. Only a few high end boards offer some sort of sound hardware acceleration, and it comes in the form of Creative sound chips :) Now that we are talking about audio, I don't see why they use an Audigy2 when you can get for the same money one of the new Creative X-Fi.

    19. Re:My favortie board by Surt · · Score: 1

      The sound quality is probably pretty much the same, except for THX enabled titles, for which I doubt the onboard sound is certified. But the real difference will be in cpu usage, where the onboard sound you have probably eats 5% of your cpu, and the audigy 2 will use close to zero. It's not a completely worthless investment if you are obsessed with your gaming benchmarks.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    20. Re:My favortie board by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Not to be rude... but your lack of knowledge about computer hardware makes your suggestions moot. Not that the other components you mention are bad.. it's just that it's hard to take your recommendations seriously when you display a lack of basic knowledge about hardware. Please refrain from making recommendations until you are better versed in the subject."

      You might have just said, "Hello, I am a pompous asshole, that is all" and saved us all some time.

    21. Re:My favortie board by arootbeer · · Score: 1

      Now that we are talking about audio, I don't see why they use an Audigy2 when you can get for the same money one of the new Creative X-Fi.

      Because they've got a stack of them in the back, and their webpage already has that option in the code?

    22. Re:My favortie board by wernercd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I hate to point out the obvious but I would wager that the average /.er does build his/her own systems...

      your preachin too the choir

    23. Re:My favortie board by lidocaineus · · Score: 1

      You're kidding about the CPU usage right? Creative is NOTORIOUS for grabbing more and more CPU with driver releases. And do you even know what's on an nForce4 chipset? Look very carefully - it has certain features that Creative will NEVER add *cough* Dolby Digital *cough*. And an Audigy2? Please. An Audigy is practically the same thing and dirt cheap (if you're going to the heinous Creative route). And finally, S/N ratio?!? Hahaha, it's a COMPUTER built for GAMES. The S/N ratio becomes so pointless at the levels you'll be playing at on your headphones or speakers that it's just a marketing tool. If you're doing serious audio work, you'd be concerned, but then you wouldn't buy a Creative card at all! I could continue but the point's been made. Looks like you're the one who needs to "not be rude".

    24. Re:My favortie board by Frastolator · · Score: 0

      Finally!

    25. Re:My favortie board by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's not kidding. That's one massive jet engine masquerading as a heatsink. Here's a coral link...
      http://www.viperlair.com.nyud.net:8090/images/revi ews/cooling/air/heatsinks/asus/stice/mounted1.jpg.

    26. Re:My favortie board by Shanep · · Score: 1

      What kind of instablities have you been experiencing?

      I have also always found that installing any SB drivers or software would create strange results, including system instability (Windows crash, game crash, soundcard/driver crash (looping sounds, loud noise)). Although it has been years since I used an SB card. I always kept in the habit of installing the card and then letting system drivers do the rest. I made it a personal policy to never install SB software/drivers ever again. I was burned too many times with my own systems, friends and work machines which had sound cards that were hardly ever going to be used anyway. Un-installing "the damage" never worked either. I always found that once I installed their drivers and silly, useless software, the system would be well and truely buggered from then on. I'd have to step back if I had a system image or curse SB and install from scratch.

      They just don't seem to be great with software, or hardware for that matter.

      --
      War crimes, torture, lies, illegal spying... Would someone give Bush a blowjob, already, so he can be impeached?
    27. Re:My favortie board by Toraz+Chryx · · Score: 1

      Um, hate to be the one to tell you, but Nvidia dropped Soundstorm after Nforce2, there's no dolby digital on NForce3 or 4.

    28. Re:My favortie board by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      That's not quite correct. The nForce4 chipset can support Dolby Digital *if* the source program supports it. So if you're playing a dolby digital DVD, you'll get dolby digital output. On the other hand, if you're playing Hunt The Whumpus (now with sound!) then it will likely fall back to stereo. (Of course, maybe the author encoded dolby digital sound for the Whumpus? That would be kind of cool.) ;-)

      More Info

    29. Re:My favortie board by bleckywelcky · · Score: 1

      Yeh, but is EAX4 really all that much better than EAX3? Or EAX2 or EAX? Do you really need to shell out the big bucks for a card that does EAX4, or can you cut your expenditures significantly and go with a card that does something less than EAX4 (but still something really good)?

    30. Re:My favortie board by Nutria · · Score: 1

      For those of us who aren't audiophiles, Dobly 5.1 using built-in sound is more than enough. (And the nForce4 chipset is no slouch like the sound installed on the Intel boards.) However, I do realize that there are audiophiles out there who *do* care. That's why I asked about the extra sound card.

      Besides, how can you be an audiophile and have a computer that generates lots of fan and spin noise.

      To be a true anal-retentive audiophile, you'll be limited to fanless/diskless systems (Via Mini-ITX in expensive radiator-as-part-of-the-case units) that netboot off remote fileservers.

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    31. Re:My favortie board by legirons · · Score: 1

      If you don't believe me on its size (no one ever does) just look at this pic [of the ASUS Star ICE].

      If you mount that in a PC with holes in the base, does it become a hovercraft and start moving around the room?

    32. Re:My favortie board by legirons · · Score: 1

      "Anyone serious about either audio or gaming adds a dedicated sound card."

      So why would this serious gamer have spent extra money on a motherboard with a good soundcard built-in, if they were planning to use a different soundcard in a PCI slot?

      "And a good one (ie. audigy2 or better)"

      lol.

      Creative Labs... "Good"... does not compute...

    33. Re:My favortie board by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      I dunno. I should try sometime. :-P

    34. Re:My favortie board by Harinezumi · · Score: 1

      Nothing wrong with being a pompous asshole if you happen to be right

    35. Re:My favortie board by Harinezumi · · Score: 1
      I have tried using the built-in sound on my A8N-SLI Premium, and it's noticeably worse than the sound from my old machine's Audigy 1 even on my ancient 2+sub speaker setup, so I wouldn't exactly call the board's sound good (though it may well be better than other manufacturers' built-in solutions). There's occasional distortion while playing World of Warcraft, for example, and my mp3s don't quite seem to have as much depth to them as they used to, though that may well be subjective.

      There are many excellent reasons to go with the ASUS board (stability, room for the largest heatsinks, passively cooled chipset, etc), but I wouldn't consider sound to be one of them. I haven't had time yet to run benchmarks to compare performance differences between the integrated sound and the Audigy, but as wretched as Creative's drivers may be, in my experience their hardware does deliver superior sound quality.

    36. Re:My favortie board by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I must say I agree, why you have to be so blatantly obtuse when discussing trivial computer hardware is beyond me. I bet he gets all the girls.

    37. Re:My favortie board by toddestan · · Score: 1

      I've always found the entire "onboard audio is teh suck!1!" crowd to be quite silly. A company could take an Audigy 2 and hardwire it to the PCI bus on a motherboard (giving the exact same functional result as adding a PCI Audigy 2), and you guys would still sit there saying "buy a separate card because the onboard audio is teh suck!!1"

      They would say that the rest of the devices in the motherboard (Northbridge, PS/2 ports, whatnot) are going to introduce noise and degrade the sound. If that's the case though, I certainly haven't noticed on any computer of mine that has a decent motherboard with a decent sound chip on it.

    38. Re:My favortie board by vanka · · Score: 1

      Well, actually the Audigy 2 ZS is THX certified. Check out the Audigy 2 ZS features page.

    39. Re:My favortie board by xouumalperxe · · Score: 1

      I was under the impression that the "chips" are pretty bare things that still require your CPU to do the difficult stuff. The actualy full fledged card removes that bit of CPU charge.

    40. Re:My favortie board by EzInKy · · Score: 1


      They just don't seem to be great with software, or hardware for that matter.


      Another poster pointed out that you were using the card under Windows and apparently Creative installs the garbage software on that system. The hardware works fine under Linux with open source drivers. Perhaps someone could port alsa to make the card work correctly on your OS.

      --
      Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
    41. Re:My favortie board by Babbster · · Score: 1

      As far as I know, THX is still just a[n expensive] A/V certification standard and there's no such thing as "enabling" THX. Creative pays the premium to stick "THX" on their cards because some people think it makes a difference and will pay extra, NOT because THX somehow enhances the sound.

    42. Re:My favortie board by Shanep · · Score: 1

      Another poster pointed out that you were using the card under Windows and apparently Creative installs the garbage software on that system. The hardware works fine under Linux with open source drivers. Perhaps someone could port alsa to make the card work correctly on your OS.

      The reason I state that they are not good at software, is because they make buggy software and drivers. The reason I state the same for their hardware is because I don't think their cards sound all that great.

      My OS of choice is OpenBSD and many SB cards seem to work fine with it. I listen to music on my iRiver H340 these days anyway and the soundcard built into my Sony VAIO works fine in WinXP for games.

      --
      War crimes, torture, lies, illegal spying... Would someone give Bush a blowjob, already, so he can be impeached?
    43. Re:My favortie board by EzInKy · · Score: 1


      I listen to music on my iRiver H340 these days anyway and the soundcard built into my Sony VAIO works fine in WinXP for games.


      Well, since I haven't used Windows in the last six years I really have nothing to compare the sound quality I get to. I have an iRiver iFP 895 that I use with a stereo microphone to record sound effects and music for phongraphy and the sound quality is just fine with my Audigy.

      --
      Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
    44. Re:My favortie board by Shanep · · Score: 1

      Well, since I haven't used Windows in the last six years

      I envy you. I mostly use OpenBSD at home and where I can at work. But I can't completely get away from Windows at work and if I want to play games like Battlefield 2, I have to run them under Windows. At least in BF2 Windows is the last thing on my mind. I could always pretend I am shooting up Redmond. ; )

      --
      War crimes, torture, lies, illegal spying... Would someone give Bush a blowjob, already, so he can be impeached?
    45. Re:My favortie board by Surt · · Score: 1

      I was referring to the onboard sound not being THX certified, which is why the audigy 2 makes a good upgrade from the onboard sound.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    46. Re:My favortie board by Surt · · Score: 1

      Well, THX certification guarantees compatibility with a bunch of dolby output modes, so having a THX certified card adds some extra assurance that you are going to be compatible with a range of outputs. It could be that the onboard sound is equally compatible, but it's hard to tell just by looking, you'd really have to go into detail on the specs. Anyway, even if they turned out to be equally compatible, you'd still have the performance advantage with the audigy 2, I'm pretty sure there has yet to be an onboard sound system with the audigy's performance capacity.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    47. Re:My favortie board by vanka · · Score: 1

      Sorry, guess I misunderstood you.

  3. PSU by Sduic · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Is that a quality PSU? Because that sysytem's probably going to need it.

    --
    *this space intentionally left blank
    "One of the four pointers saying 'come and see', and I saw, and beheld a white
    1. Re:PSU by ackthpt · · Score: 1
      Is that a quality PSU? Because that sysytem's probably going to need it.

      IIRC Enermax is another one of those generic Taiwanese PSU's which usually have a failure rate which just doesn't sit well (with me anyway) being hooked up the $,$$$ worth of gear.

      I bought a PC Power & Cooling PSU for my energy hungry desktop money hole. Doing quite well a few years on.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    2. Re:PSU by FauxPasIII · · Score: 1

      > IIRC Enermax is another one of those generic Taiwanese PSU's which usually
      > have a failure rate which just doesn't sit well (with me anyway) being
      > hooked up the $,$$$ worth of gear.

      Yeah !

      Except like, the opposite of that.

      Enermax is the most reliable consumer brand in my experience. Their noisetaker
      line carries a _3 Year_ replacement warranty. That's not easy to find.

      Antec is also quite good.

      --
      25% Funny, 25% Insightful, 25% Informative, 25% Troll
    3. Re:PSU by Sduic · · Score: 1

      Now Antec I have experience with. They make some great PSUs, their "True Power" line has proven reliable.

      --
      *this space intentionally left blank
      "One of the four pointers saying 'come and see', and I saw, and beheld a white
    4. Re:PSU by ChronoReverse · · Score: 1

      The exact opposite actually. Enermax is a good brand. Their 350W powersupplies will outperform many 450W PS.

    5. Re:PSU by Blue-Footed+Boobie · · Score: 1
      What?! Enermax is one of the higher-quality PSUs that you can get. There is a reason many servers use them.

      I'm just curious, but where did you get your experience with Enermax PSUs from?

      --
      DAMN YOU OCTODOG! DAMN YOU TO HELL!
    6. Re:PSU by dlZ · · Score: 1

      I believe you're thinking of Inermux PSU's, not Enermax.

      --
      rm -rf ./evidence @ punkcomp
    7. Re:PSU by ackthpt · · Score: 1
      I'm just curious, but where did you get your experience with Enermax PSUs from?

      One of the enthusiast sites did a PSU comparison a couple years ago. Enermax, one of the highly touted brands, actually performed below average on 5v and 12v rails. The last test was the old crowbar test, overloading the PSU to see how it would behave. Enermax was one which burned up. I was leaning strongly towards one of their models until that review. There were a few which shut down or at the very least didn't burn up, PCP&C was one of them. Putting my own money down, I tend to be cautious.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  4. Welcome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    I for one welcome our new SLI overlords

    1. Re:Welcome by ackthpt · · Score: 1
      I for one welcome our new SLI overlords

      I just dodged that bullet myself, when ordering a new mobo with 64 bit Athlon, etc. I just wanted a new mobo and to keep using all the components I'd already spent about $1,000 on and was intent on still using. Cancelled the order quick and got one with the cruddy old AGP. Not ready to need SLI, yet.

      SLI has some things to offer, but not to an old code jockey like me who considers Settlers of Catan a worthwhile game.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    2. Re:Welcome by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      Cancelled the order quick and got one with the cruddy old AGP.

      * /me Jaw Drops

      You... went... with an AGP board?! You do realize that nearly all video cards are now PCI Express? FYI, PCI Express is not the same thing as SLI. It's a new standard that has TWICE the bandwidth of AGP. You could have gone for a board like the A8N-E board that has PCI Express but no SLI at a good price.

      * /me Jaw Drops Again

      I just wanted a new mobo and to keep using all the components I'd already spent about $1,000 on and was intent on still using.

      Okay, I can understand if you still want to use your old video card. But all your other stuff should still work fine in a PCI Express machine. I'm curious, why upgrade your board/CPU if you're not willing to go with the latest video bus technology?

    3. Re:Welcome by ackthpt · · Score: 1
      Okay, I can understand if you still want to use your old video card. But all your other stuff should still work fine in a PCI Express machine. I'm curious, why upgrade your board/CPU if you're not willing to go with the latest video bus technology?

      The current version of what I have in PCI Express terms would soak me about $600. I could just scrape together the $300 for the new board, as long as I could just move my 1.25 GB of DDR memory and my current video card over. I also have a backup video card, which I nearly gave away but plug in from time to time when I'm debugging hardware, since it's a fairly simple little thing with 64 MB of memory and good enough (Actually it's more than good enough for Scorched Earth 3D

      Maybe when I get my pickup paid off I can think again about dropping a fat wad of cash on a whizzy video card, but not at the moment.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    4. Re:Welcome by zardo · · Score: 1

      In my mind, SLI is reminiscent of the last days of 3DFX.

    5. Re:Welcome by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      FYI, the NVidia 6600 is a pretty good card and only costs about $135.00. As for the other stuff, my point was that PCI Express systems have backward compatibility with older PCI cards. I certainly have no difficulties with my Leadtek TV Card on the A8N-E board I'm currently using.

      Anyway, sorry if I'm being a little pushy. I just like to see people future proof their systems whenever possible. It kept my last machine going strong for nearly five years. I'd probably still be using it if some of the hardware wasn't failing. :-)

    6. Re:Welcome by EzInKy · · Score: 1


      You... went... with an AGP board?! You do realize that nearly all video cards are now PCI Express? FYI, PCI Express is not the same thing as SLI. It's a new standard that has TWICE the bandwidth of AGP. You could have gone for a board like the A8N-E board that has PCI Express but no SLI at a good price.


      There a many reasons not to go with PCI Express, including having an already perfectly good working AGP or PCI card. Standards come and go so fast that what you buy today is already obselote and who knows what will be the "next great thing" when it's time to replace your board again three years down the road.

      --
      Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
    7. Re:Welcome by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      There a many reasons not to go with PCI Express, including having an already perfectly good working AGP or PCI card.

      Well, that's the theory anyway. The problem is that if you're investing in a board you want to keep for awhile, you are going to run into problems when you want to upgrade your video card. As a result, he may find himself having to replace his entire Motherboard, CPU, and memory architecture in a year or two just to upgrade his video card. The result is that his upgrade now is false economy.

      Standards come and go so fast that what you buy today is already obselote

      That's not completely true. As long as you purchased a board with AGP 2x or higher, an AGP board purchased 5 years ago should still work fine with an AGP video card today. The performance characteristics are a bit different with a slower bus, but it still works. PCI Express, on the other hand, is a completely new architecture on par with going from ISA to PCI. Anyone purchasing a board right now would be wise to go with PCIe as it's likely that AGP and traditional PCI support will eventually fade out.

      Of course, he did say that he just wants to play Scorched Earth 3D. So feel free to ignore me. :-)

    8. Re:Welcome by EzInKy · · Score: 1


      As a result, he may find himself having to replace his entire Motherboard, CPU, and memory architecture in a year or two just to upgrade his video card. The result is that his upgrade now is false economy. ...

      As long as you purchased a board with AGP 2x or higher, an AGP board purchased 5 years ago should still work fine with an AGP video card today.


      Can you spot the contradiction here? On the one hand you say that it is false economy to try to get a couple of more years out of a card, on the other you state that a board bought five years ago is still good today.

      --
      Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
    9. Re:Welcome by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      No, no contradiction. A board is a far more expensive acquisition than a video card. Purchasing a video card means that *one* component in the system changes. Purchasing a new motherboard means that the board and the CPU need to change at a minimum. Likely, you'll also need to change out the memory and (as I said) the video card because it doesn't support PCI Express.

      on the other you state that a board bought five years ago is still good today.

      Actually, I was just making the point that the video busses don't change as often as you suggest. A five year old motherboard is likely going to be in need of retiring. But my point is that if you purchased AGP 2x back then, you would have been future proofed for that entire five year period. Purchasing AGP now means no such guarantee. Just like how PCI video cards became hard to come by after AGP appeared, AGP has already become hard to come by. That's why (IMHO) it's not a good idea to get an AGP board right now. :-)

    10. Re:Welcome by TooncesTheCat · · Score: 1

      You sir are a uninformed fucking douche. PCI-Express is just another marketing gimmick for the masses with the IQ's of yourself to eat and gobble up thinking that PCI-Express is going to make your computer run faster compared to the same card on a AGP bus. We do not even use the max bandwidth of AGP 8x yet. What makes you think that we need to use 16x right yet when we are barely scratching the 4x surface. AGP cards in alot of tests have outperformed the PCI-Express counterparts. I hate your fucking face. And from your profile I can see that you have your own blog. You sir are really a fucking person that I hate.

    11. Re:Welcome by TooncesTheCat · · Score: 1

      OMG LOLSZZ!1!111!111!1!11!!!!!!1 OMG WH3N P3OPLA SAY IN A YEAR OR 2 I MAY HAEV 2 R3UPGRAED CAUS3 I WENT WIT AGP INSTAAD OF PCIE-XPRES LOLOZLZ

      I SAY RAMBUS!LO1!1!1!11!!!!1!!!11 WTF LOL WUT HAPENAD 2 TH3M ROFLZ!??!?!!? LOL TAHT WAS DA NAXT BIG THNG LOLOL11!!!!!1111!1!!!11!!!!11 OMG LOL

    12. Re:Welcome by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      Troll much, do we?

      FYI, the problem with AGP vs. PCI Express isn't bandwidth. It's that PCI Express is quickly displacing AGP, making AGP equipment hard to find.

      And yes, I do have a "blog". No, I am not your typical blogger. Try reading it sometime. I don't think you'll find a "real" blog there, but something much better.

      Then again, why bother with intelligent communication when you can troll and tell people you hate them?

  5. One more Slashdvertisement by MyTwoCentsWorth · · Score: 5, Funny

    I hope it pays for the hosting costs... or the editor's training :)

    1. Re:One more Slashdvertisement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What training? Monkeys dont need training. Feed them bananas.

    2. Re:One more Slashdvertisement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      since you have this distorted view of what an advertisement is...

      under what conditions can slashdot post anything regarding a product a company makes.

    3. Re:One more Slashdvertisement by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1


      It's a really bad idea to book a slashdertisement for two reasons. Firstly, no-one will really read the article, they'll just skip to the comments to have the people who pretend to have read it summarize it for them. Secondly the most vocal people in the comments section will be those who have been pissed off by the company / product / service and see an opportunity to finally have their revenge.

      Still, it's a business model I suppose. :)

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    4. Re:One more Slashdvertisement by hex1b · · Score: 1

      If they want to use that as a business model, they take their chances on comments from customers they've pissed off, like me.

      Loaded Opteron server, $5,550. They shipped it two weeks late and broken. I returned it and they let it sit in repair for two weeks. I had to insult the guy in the shop to get him to go find it and fix it. After six weeks of shouting I finally got a machine that works, but the 15 day registration period for some of the software expired and they wouldn't replace it, because "We don't take returns on software."

      Decide for yourself.

      0x1b

      --
      Computer scientist, Software engineer.
  6. Monarch by AlienSexist · · Score: 2, Informative

    I've bought Monarch computers before, usually on the value-end for simple workstations. They held up fairly well. But there was always some small problem like a CD burner never worked on a new system, or the CPU fan would die and nuke the CPU. I'm sure they love you plugging their products on such a major website. Did you disclose if you work for them or not?

    1. Re:Monarch by Dare+nMc · · Score: 2, Interesting

      > All Monarch PCs include: 48-72 hr. Burn-in Diagnostic Latest BIOS, drivers, and tested patches installed (All drivers are also included on CD); award-winning assembly and installation including tie-off on all cables

      I wonder what they do for burn in?
      My experience is the same as yours with monarch, neither the system, or the complete board (MB+CPU+DDR+fan) I got worked right at first, and took 3 returns of the system, for them to get it so it could even boot a linux install cd (apperently was bad memory.)

      this might be industry standard for discounters for all I know though. They did get the system working again, but not worth the down time.

    2. Re:Monarch by ChrisF79 · · Score: 1

      I've bought Monarch computers before, usually on the value-end for simple workstations. They held up fairly well. But there was always some small problem like a CD burner never worked on a new system, or the CPU fan would die and nuke the CPU. I'm sure they love you plugging their products on such a major website. Did you disclose if you work for them or not?

      But there's a 62 point inspection as the article claims. Perhaps the CD burner is check #63 and the CPU fan is check #64. Better add two more checks to the already inflated list.

      --
      Finance tutorials and more! Understandfinance
    3. Re:Monarch by KavyBoy · · Score: 3, Informative

      My Monarch system took an addition month for tech support to fix. Anything stressing the GPU would cause an instant lockup. I had to update all the firmware myself - it was months out of date. So much for the updates and burn-in. I really wished I had just put it together myself from Newegg. It would have been faster and the returns, if any, would have been easier.

    4. Re:Monarch by AlienSexist · · Score: 1

      Lol! Yeah, probably. The fan worked fine on delivery, it just died right after warranty expired. Isn't that always the case? I thought there was once a Garfield comic strip about that aspect of Murphy's Law. It's just marketing fluff for sure.

    5. Re:Monarch by kaschei · · Score: 1

      I worked there over the summer as a system assembler (hope you guys liked your case interiors, they are sticklers for hiding loose wires). They generally do a memtest overnight after a system is assembled, then do software install, including latest drivers, test the audio, dvd, LAN, accessories etc. then let it run a 2d color test and then a 3d benchmark for a while (I only did assembly never actually got to do QA/QC/software load, so I don't know all the details, but Doom3 benchmarks and 3dmark were common sights).

      They had a pretty steady stream of returns for repair, I'd guess maybe 1-2% of their production, certainly not much more. Honestly, a lot of those were from people doing stupid shit to their computers (somebody gets a barebones, when they install their stuff they cut wires along with the cable ties... lots of those got free PSU replacements) but I'm sure more than a few were just problems that aren't immediately apparent (during the burn-in process) or possibly caused by the drop-kick delivery method UPS sometimes seems to use.

      Also, about booting a linux install CD, that's weird because their driver installation is actually a Linux boot CD with all the oodles of latest drivers and an hw-detection program, so necessarily the computer had already booted to a linux CD before you got it. And "bad memory" is not only the most common problem but the first one they check, every time. I'm guessing they just said "bad memory" after they rebuilt it from scratch or similar and it magically worked.

      --
      I should not talk so much about myself if there were anybody else whom I knew as well. -Henry David Thoreau
    6. Re:Monarch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea, don't get me started on Monarch. I ordered a simple Motherboard and CPU combo from them. I didn't really want them to test it, but since it was a combo they did anyway. Or at least they claim they did. When I got it the CPU and heatsink were in the socket then the motherboard box was forced closed putting a lot of force on the CPU. And what do you know? It would only boot if you cleared the CMOS each time. It wouldn't cold boot without it, or warm boot, not even into the bios. Then it took 3 weeks to get them to exchange it! It was a good price, but a terrible deal. By the time I got everything in working order the price on NewEgg had dropped to the same as this combo.
      Friends don't let friends buy Monarch.

  7. OMFG??? by Dragon+Rojo · · Score: 1

    5000 bucks?

    Does any game in this year(or the next couple) take advantage of so much power??

    1. Re:OMFG??? by Torinir · · Score: 1

      If Q4 and SWBF2 have the needs that I'm hearing, then that system would fall under the "adequate" category. Although I'm waiting for UT2007 and Huxley (MMORPG built on the the Unreal3 engine) to come out. Man, it's time to start putting more pennies away... again.

      If someone has linkage to the video of Huxley's introduction at E3, it'd be great. I don't have the links available, and I can't access the site at work. :(

    2. Re:OMFG??? by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      Sure, you'll get up to five frames per second more than on a gaming PC for 1000$.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    3. Re:OMFG??? by hamburger+lady · · Score: 1

      Duke Nukem Forever.

      --

      ---
      Is this the MPAA? Is this the RIAA? Is this the DMCA? I thought it was the USA!
    4. Re:OMFG??? by Kentamanos · · Score: 1

      I hear Team Fortress 2 will require a machine like this as well...

  8. Fine but... by DaPoulpe · · Score: 3, Interesting

    how much power this baby needs ?
    Does it come along with it's small nuclear power plant ?

    1. Re:Fine but... by Sduic · · Score: 1

      Does it come along with it's small nuclear power plant ?

      Do you really want to pay for the delivery of that?

      --
      *this space intentionally left blank
      "One of the four pointers saying 'come and see', and I saw, and beheld a white
    2. Re:Fine but... by DaPoulpe · · Score: 1

      Do you really want to pay for the delivery of that?

      Well for $5000 we could expect a free delivery of a pocket-sized version, at least !

    3. Re:Fine but... by Ironsides · · Score: 1

      Not sure about power consumption, but what I found interesting is that it has about the same power supply as the file server I built for myself. 600w power supply and only 3 hard drives? Must be the SLI video cards. The file server I have has 9 hard drives (8 in a raid) and would not boot up properly with a "mere" 480w power supply. Hence why I upgraded to a 600w.

      Lets see, 600w @ 120v rms = ~5 amps. Your standard household circuit is 10 or 20 amps.... I think we are almost at the point where computers need their own dedicated circuit breaker like dryers and ovens do.

      --
      Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
  9. this just in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This just in: a computer built with the highest end components yields the highest end performance.

    This was the most blatant advertisement as an "article" that I have ever seen. Too bad Monarch's servers can't handle the load; it makes the advertisement far less effective.

    1. Re:this just in... by Sduic · · Score: 1

      When submitting ads to slashdot, it's important to remember the maxim "scarcity sells". While the site may have been passed over without a second thought ordinarily, the belief that the site will go down soon attracts visitors, while others will likely wait to see what you have to offer. In this way, a slashdotting can actually prove beneficial (just don't tell the sysadmin I said that.)

      --
      *this space intentionally left blank
      "One of the four pointers saying 'come and see', and I saw, and beheld a white
    2. Re:this just in... by cerebis · · Score: 1
      Aye, the web is already littered with hardware review sites with pseudo-scientific analyses, as if they need to make it onto the front page of Slashdot. Computers made from commodity parts -- that anyone with half a brain can buy and assemble -- does not make interesting copy. Yes, the best parts together make a fast computer, this hasn't changed in 15 years.

      Maybe I am just getting old...

  10. Target Audience by Dragon+Rojo · · Score: 1

    This is probably targeted to the ones that think the more expensive the system, the bigger their penis is.

    1. Re:Target Audience by Kazzahdrane · · Score: 1

      Surely it's inversely proportional. The smaller their penis the more they think they have to spend to be cool. Like short guys who are always starting fights!

    2. Re:Target Audience by smooth+wombat · · Score: 2
      Like short guys who are always starting fights!

      I can't completely agree with that. Being somewhat shorter than the national average (I'm 5' 7") I find that the reason those of us whom you would consider short and starting fights is the result of those who are taller thinking they can do what they want.

      For example, when I used to go out to bars (and did my best not to fall asleep because I was bored with the whole scene) invariably there were one or two guys who were taller than myself who felt it was perfectly acceptable to plow their way through a crowd. By plow I mean push people aside because they felt they were the most important people in the world and the normal rules of courtesy didn't apply to them.

      Now, in that situation if myself or someone else who was shorter than these nimrods were to go after these guys, would they have started the fight or would they simply have been retaliating for what had been taking place?

      However, there is the Napoleon complex which does suggest that those on the short end of the scale are more aggressive though this has never been fully demonstrated or observed to any degree.

      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    3. Re:Target Audience by Namronorman · · Score: 1

      I take it you've had the kind of friend who is really short and almost brags about his penis size as much as his rig, yeah... I have a friend like that as well...

      --
      $fortune
      Tomorrow has been canceled due to lack of interest.
    4. Re:Target Audience by Kazzahdrane · · Score: 1

      Perhaps there is some selective reporting here, but I've known a few short (I'm talking shorter than your 5'7" here) who have been real dickheads and started fights for no reason. You know the type, the kid at school who bullies people just 'cos he's short. Read Of Mice and Men? The name escapes me but the "bad guy" in that book is a little guy with ginger hair who hates everyone else because he's so small. Good read too.

    5. Re:Target Audience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh man, I thought you were never to talk about publicly ?!
      Hopefully there are few chicks around, I should still be able to pull...

    6. Re:Target Audience by hvatum · · Score: 0

      You tell 'em short guy! Put those tall egomaniacs in their place.

      Seriously though. You complain about other people giving meaningless anecdotes about short people being agressive. Then you go on to provide some isolated example of arrogant fools who just so happen to be tall. That doesn't prove any correlation.

      Give it up, you can't have your cake and eat it to.

      --
      Netbooks, they come with Linux or a $3 copy of Windows. Either way, Microsoft loses.
    7. Re:Target Audience by MattHaffner · · Score: 1

      Hmmm... your .sig seems to disagree with you :)

    8. Re:Target Audience by TooncesTheCat · · Score: 1

      Being tall sucks.

      I am 6'4 and have really hated being the tall kid. People are always wanting to pick fights with you for no fucking reason.

      When I was little my long arms were always the first to go up under a parked car to get someones baseball / football / whatever.

      Then you have the fucking relatives who say when you have not seen them in 3-5 months say "MY HOW YOU'VE GROWN!!!!" That and the remarks of how I should play basketball ( a sport I despise )

      Then you have the whole thing of being tall supposedly have a huge schlong. Not true. Average male here :"D

      Fuck short people saying we are all egomaniacs and jerks.

    9. Re:Target Audience by hvatum · · Score: 0

      I've never thought about any of those problems. I always thought being tall would just be nice (with the exception of buying cars in which case it would expensive!).

      Now I'm a bit more satisfied with my height. I am surprised though that your equipment isn't any larger, you think that would scale up with the rest of your body?? Have you measured it to be sure. If you're just comparing it with the size of your leg that might be the problem. You need a proper control group.

      --
      Netbooks, they come with Linux or a $3 copy of Windows. Either way, Microsoft loses.
    10. Re:Target Audience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that you, Zach?

    11. Re:Target Audience by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      That's exactly the sort of thing I'd expect a shorty to say.

  11. RAID-0 by MagPulse · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Let's take RAID and use it to halve the time it takes to lose all our data. Great idea.

    I'd rather have two RAID-1 arrays, one small and fast and one larger and slower. But maybe l33t gamers don't care about their data.

    1. Re:RAID-0 by Kentamanos · · Score: 1

      I use RAID-0 at home. A lot of motherboards only support 0 or 1, and 0 performs better on writes (obviously).

      As far as hard drives failing, I find I can easily backup all of the truly important things (source code, documents) to my USB keychain drive. The typical home computer's hard drive is usually about 90% (made it up, probably higher, but you get the point) taken up with things you could install from CD if you lost it and other things that really are not that important.

    2. Re:RAID-0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Let's take RAID and use it to halve the time it takes to lose all our data. Great idea.

      Obviously you want Raid 0+1 then. Two Raid 1 arrays used as a Raid 0 stripe set.

      Good stuff!

    3. Re:RAID-0 by Sduic · · Score: 1

      How about RAID 10? Needs four disks minimum IIRC, but faster than just two RAID 1s!

      --
      *this space intentionally left blank
      "One of the four pointers saying 'come and see', and I saw, and beheld a white
    4. Re:RAID-0 by Sduic · · Score: 1

      Your thinking of RAID 10, I believe.

      RAID 01 would be a RAID 1 array of RAID 0 arrays.

      --
      *this space intentionally left blank
      "One of the four pointers saying 'come and see', and I saw, and beheld a white
    5. Re:RAID-0 by Surt · · Score: 1

      They mostly don't, it's all reinstallable to them, read/write (mostly read) performance is what matters. A common solution to the increased data vulnerability is to use a backup system for important data.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    6. Re:RAID-0 by Zen · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I've had the same argument/discussion with a friend of mine a couple times. He's all about going to Quakecon/etc and showing off his stuff. His current machine is a four drive SATA raid 0 setup. His roomie has a two drive SATA raid 0 setup. Very similar hardware specs except for the additional two drives. On my buddies machine, Windows XP will boot up from BIOS post to being able to click on an application on the desktop in just a couple seconds (somewhere around 2, I forget exactly). The other guys machine takes closer to 6 or 8 seconds. He is also always the first person in a level on a game due to loading speeds, which could make the difference to getting to the rocket launcher/etc first. Me, I prefer Raid 5 (+1 if you can get it), but my current setup is Raid 5 on the household server, and no protection on the pc's.

    7. Re:RAID-0 by solipsist0x01 · · Score: 1

      I would rather have 2 raptors in RAID-0 and one Caviar.

  12. Seems like ... by sim82 · · Score: 1, Funny

    they are running the webserver as a pixel-shader on one of their geforcen.

  13. That means a lot! by Eightyford · · Score: 4, Funny

    1574 seconds on the sample size that I used.

    Wow, that't amazingly fast!

    1. Re:That means a lot! by stu42j · · Score: 1

      Oh, that's nothing. My system can do a DivX encode in 4 seconds!

      Of course, my sample size may not be the same.

    2. Re:That means a lot! by lupinstel · · Score: 0

      This system is so fast that when he played back the Divx file he watched the whole thing in 787 seconds!

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Cthulhu.
    3. Re:That means a lot! by Loundry · · Score: 1

      Wow, that't amazingly fast!

      I agree! It's over TWICE as fast as 4000 seconds on the sample size!

      --
      I don't make the rules. I just make fun of them.
  14. Something disturbing by yfmaster · · Score: 4, Insightful

    they list a feature on the motherboard, "IEEE". Do they realize that IEEE is an orginization, and not a part? The number that goes after IEEE is more important, like 802.11 or 1394

    1. Re:Something disturbing by jalefkowit · · Score: 1

      I can imagine a conversation with their sales guy:

      SALES GUY: We support IEEE.

      BUYER: "IEEE"? What IEEE standard are you talking about?

      SALES GUY (confidently): All of them!

    2. Re:Something disturbing by TheGavster · · Score: 1

      It doesnt implement any particular standard, but it has all of them burned into a ROM in case you need to look something up. In unused regions of the chip, they laid in the names of prominent IEEE members.

      --
      "Because Science" is one step from "Because old book". Try "Because of my experiment testing my falsifiable assertion".
  15. Missing review parts by FidelCatsro · · Score: 2, Funny

    1: Does it help you save money on your heating bill
    2: Could it achieve flight if you took off the side of the case
    3: does the Decibel rating make my stage amp look like a pair of cheap headphones
    4:Does it weigh more than a small car
    6:Does it run linux ;)
    7: what's it like in soviet Russia
    8: Is this the PC they are running their servers on

    --
    The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
    1. Re:Missing review parts by Radres · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      7: what's it like in soviet Russia

      In Soviet Russia, penis size is not increased by purchasing a faster computer.

    2. Re:Missing review parts by Secrity · · Score: 1

      I read their specs and I can answer two of your questions: It is not as heavy as a small car (at least not a street licensable small car). It does run Linux and it is available with Linux already installed.

    3. Re:Missing review parts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      9: Can it auto-add question marks?

    4. Re:Missing review parts by buckthorn · · Score: 1

      Also forgot to speculate what a Beowulf cluster of these would be like. And the ever popular

      1) Post ad-like story on Slashdot
      2) ???
      3) PROFIT!

    5. Re:Missing review parts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The editors Obviously don't appreciate sarcasm on their slashvertisments

  16. RAID Setup: RAID 0 (Zero) Setup by Malc · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "RAID Setup: RAID 0 (Zero) Setup"

    Stupid stupid stupid.

    Have fun rebuiliding your system. Really this shouldn't even be labelled "RAID setup". There is no redundancy (the R in RAID). Two discs stripped like this means you have two chances of losing everything on *both* of them. Is hard drive performance so critical that the chance is worth it?

    1. Re:RAID Setup: RAID 0 (Zero) Setup by Rowan_u · · Score: 1

      Raid 0 doubles your chance of failure. However, on a high end gaming rig, the data really isn't that important. Performance increases, however microscopic, are. You will be filling this drive up with installed games, not hosting a mission critical database on it. Even on my modest gaming PC, there is no personal data anywhere to be found. You'll find all that on RAID 5 :)

      --
      only one everything
    2. Re:RAID Setup: RAID 0 (Zero) Setup by Nemith · · Score: 1

      Thats why the number is 0. Get it? Zero as in not really RAID.

      RAID-0 does have the advantage of being very fast, which is why it was used here.

    3. Re:RAID Setup: RAID 0 (Zero) Setup by AKAImBatman · · Score: 2, Informative

      FYI, the A8N board has a couple different hardware RAID configurations built in. If you don't like the RAID 0, you can reconfigure. Here's a list I pulled from here:

      NVRAID: RAID0, RAID1, RAID 0+1 and JBOD span cross SATA and PATA.

    4. Re:RAID Setup: RAID 0 (Zero) Setup by Guysmiley777 · · Score: 1

      Without a good controller, RAID 0 will actually slow down transfer rates. And by good controller I mean something other than the POS integrated into motherboards.

      --
      Coding with assembly is like playing with Legos. Coding an application in assembly is like building a car with Legos.
    5. Re:RAID Setup: RAID 0 (Zero) Setup by Malc · · Score: 1

      It's not about mission criticalness. For me, it's my time. Do I want to be spending my time reinstalling things due to poor decisions? And really, how many games suffer from poor performance running off a normal modern hard drive? Besides, how many games are designed so that they thrash the hard drive right in the middle of action? I might buy the argument if it were for video editting, but not games. Get more memory and rely on the system file cache if you must.

      Sorry, but people seem to buy in to this marketting BS and do things with little thought. It's a free world and people are welcome to kid themselves. I guess somehow they have to justify spending so much money.

    6. Re:RAID Setup: RAID 0 (Zero) Setup by Rowan_u · · Score: 1

      Yes, I wholeheartedly agree. The performance boost games receive from a Raid-0 set up is meager at best. The most you can hope for is slightly shorter loading screens or shorter boot-up times. Certainly not worth doubling your consumed energy, and adding a significant amount to your storage cost.

      A solution to the reinstallation issue that I use is to simply keep a ghost image of my drive with all the games installed already. Yes, this takes up a huge chunk of my Raid 5, but its more then worth it, as that image represents many hours of installation time. Using this set-up I haven't reinstalled Windows since XP first came out. And I've drastically reduced the time I would have spent reinstalling Unreal Tournament :)

      --
      only one everything
    7. Re:RAID Setup: RAID 0 (Zero) Setup by Surt · · Score: 1

      Yes, because backing up your data to an external hard drive is cheap and easy these days. For a gamer, the speed advantage offered by a raid-0 is a not insignificant gaming advantage.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    8. Re:RAID Setup: RAID 0 (Zero) Setup by 2008 · · Score: 1

      Your time, I agree.

      If you play games a lot, cutting the 30 second level load time down to 15 will save you 6 minutes a day of staring at a loading screen. (Based on 4 hours of 10 minute rounds). Ghosting to/from a USB hard drive takes a few minutes to set up, then you can walk away (probably to a games console). Using a RAID and backing up weekly will save you a noticable amount of time.

      Personally, I'd rather have the extra space - I never uninstall anything, still have my original Wolfenstein 3D :)

      --
      I quit!
    9. Re:RAID Setup: RAID 0 (Zero) Setup by joranbelar · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't jump to conclusions. I prefer RAID-0 setups for my working environment, supplemented by daily automatic backups of only certain data to a separate drive. The point is, there's no reason I need to have redundant backups for my \Windows directory, \Program Files, game installations, etc. All I need to back up are personal files, settings, and data. RAID-1 (et al) setups are simply a waste for me, because it's all or nothing - either EVERYTHING gets mirrored and you lose half your drive space, or NOTHING gets mirrored. I prefer to have the performance boost of multiple drives linked in RAID-0 while backing up only those things that I need to.

      So, not quite as stupid as you claim.

    10. Re:RAID Setup: RAID 0 (Zero) Setup by Malc · · Score: 1

      1) You've had to buy extra hardware for your backups. How is that any different to using RAID-1 or RAID-5?

      2) I want things like \Windows and \Program Files backed up. Reinstalling the OS isn't something I relish. It takes hours just to get the software reinstalled. Then there's time spent configuring, etc. When the OS goes down one is forced to work on it *now* interrupting anything else that's going on.

    11. Re:RAID Setup: RAID 0 (Zero) Setup by stuartkahler · · Score: 1

      You do back up your data anyway, don't you? Or do you have really bad luck with drives going bad? Anyone buying this system can afford an external 300gig hard drive to back up the important stuff anyway. For most people, a 40 gig drive should hold all the files that aren't just installation files. Raid 0 is for people who want their games and apps to start up twice as fast.

      If doubling your failure rate of a particular drive puts you over the threshold, then you should probably stay away from that particular drive in the first place. Nearly everyone already runs systems that completely fail if one drive goes bad anyway, so what's the difference? We're probably talking about raising your yearly failure rate from 1% to 2%. As long as the drives you use don't have a history of going bad, you won't notice the difference.

    12. Re:RAID Setup: RAID 0 (Zero) Setup by joranbelar · · Score: 1

      1) But I didn't have to buy another 250gb hard drive just to back up 20gb worth of data. You also have the option of backing up to external USB, flash drive, CDs, tape, or any existing drive that you already have.

      2) True, different strokes for different folks I suppose...My OCD compels me to do a complete fresh OS install if any problems occur :)

  17. Venture Brothers by caesar-auf-nihil · · Score: 1

    A bit off topic, but when I saw the headline I started to laugh as it reminded me of "The Monarch" from the 'toon Venture Brothers on Cartoon Network/Adult Swim. I kept thinking about the Monarch's pathetic supercomputer that he had to reboot when giving a powerpoint presentation on how evil his plans were to another super villan.
    I supsect if he had the System reviewed in this topic he would still be incompetent, but at least he'd be having fun fragging his enemies.

    --
    -When going for broke, go for Ithaca!
    1. Re:Venture Brothers by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      You think you're hot shit in a champagne glass, but you're really cold diarrhea in a Dixie cup!

    2. Re:Venture Brothers by caesar-auf-nihil · · Score: 1

      I'm not even going to flush! Come and see the wrath of the Monarch!

      Thanks for the laugh - that last quote still makes me howl.

      --
      -When going for broke, go for Ithaca!
  18. While we're plugging PC makers, overdrivepc.com by MattW · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I bought an Overdrive PC Torque.SLI a while back. I talked with Mario there, who actually talked me down off a higher end processor, telling me he could hook me up with a slightly lower end, $800 cheaper processor but get far more overclocking out of it than the faster process.

    It's fast as hell, and when it had a stability issue due to the overclocking (yes, it was pushing it), he helped tweak it to where it was rock solid.

    If you're going to pay this much for a computer, get someone who actually knows how to squeeze the maximum out of it, if you don't have the time or ability to do it yourself.

  19. SLI is always a waste by vectorian798 · · Score: 3, Informative

    "Video Cards: 2 x NVIDIA Geforce 7800 GTX 256MB GDDR3, VIVO/, Dual-DVI"

    No game manufacturer is going to make a game that REQUIRES so much brute-force GPU power to play...that would kill the market. All this would do is make games playable with insane settings like 4x FSAA and 8x Anisotropic Filtering. But most gamers (read: the average gamer) can't tell the difference between different levels of anisotropic, or the difference between 2x and 4x FSAA unless they stop and look at the screen. When is the last time you ran through the jungle in Far Cry and said to yourself while being chased by a mutant monkey with uncanny ability to maul, "Damn these leaves need to lose some jaggies"?

    The point is that as soon as games come out that need next generation GPU's, your SLI system is obsolete because it likely won't have HARDWARE features to perform next-generation effects. The analogy I like to make is that 4 GeForce 4 MX's can't match a single GeForce 4 Ti 4200 because the 4 MX doesn't have hardware shaders while the Ti does. So is it really worth dropping that extra money (don't forget, your mobo needs to have extra PCI x 8 or x 16 slot as well, so there is a little extra cost there too)?

    That being said, this system you posted is quite beastly :)

    1. Re:SLI is always a waste by superpulpsicle · · Score: 1

      This just meets the Vista low end requirements.

    2. Re:SLI is always a waste by Silverlancer · · Score: 2, Funny

      You could run any game out with max multisampling AA and AF on the 7800. With two... you could run... two games at once... with max AA/AF... uh... yeah... ;)

    3. Re:SLI is always a waste by Rowan_u · · Score: 1

      I think I speak for a lot of gamers when I say, "yes I am thinking about jaggies when being chased by those mutant monkeys." The tweaking of video setting to for optimum viewing pleasure has been a traditional ritual since the first 3d accelerators hit the market. Its almost as fun as playing the game itself. Even my wife notices the difference between 4x FSAA and 0x FSAA when playing NWN or Guild Wars, and she is relatively new to PC gaming.

      That being said, I'll totally agree that all the SLI set-ups are completely overkill for today's games. You can squeeze a decent amount of anti-aliasing, Anisotropic Filtering, or even V-Sync out of a relatively modest card like the ATI 9800, or the Nvidia 6600.

      --
      only one everything
    4. Re:SLI is always a waste by QuantumPion · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think the real purpose of the 7800 gtx/sli is for people playing the latest games on HDTV's, which are 1920x1080 resolution. While playing on a big TV, you still need AA so playing Battlefield 2 at 1920x1080 with 4x AA requires quite a bit of horsepower.

    5. Re:SLI is always a waste by CausticPuppy · · Score: 2, Funny

      No game manufacturer is going to make a game that REQUIRES so much brute-force GPU power to play...that would kill the market.

      Duke Nukem Forever.

      --
      -CausticPuppy "Of all the people I know, you're certainly one of them." -Somebody I don't know
    6. Re:SLI is always a waste by Peldor · · Score: 1

      Duh. If you've got the cash for this rig, you can afford to replace the two 7800GTXs with two 8800GTXs next year. Obsolete is word rich people use when talking about others, not themselves.

    7. Re:SLI is always a waste by Surt · · Score: 1

      The difference for a serious gamer will be in the fps achievable at a high resolution. If you can go from 40 fps (frame latency = 25ms) to 80 fps (frame latency = 12.5 ms) you gain a 12.5 ms reaction time advantage. With human eye to hand latencies running in the 80-120 ms range, that's > 10% advantage. This all assumes of course that you are using a monitor capable of displaying 80fps, but any high end CRT will do that for you.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    8. Re:SLI is always a waste by -noefordeg- · · Score: 1

      Why mod such crap as informative?

      Nobody cares if a game REQUIRES that much power... BF2 (Battlefield 2) doesn't REQUIRE that much power, but that much power get you a very smooth ride!
      I upgraded my computer with a 7800GTX and 2GB DDR2 memory just to play BF2 at high settings, 1600x1200 with AA and AF without any huge slowdowns.

      "The point is that as soon as games come out that need next generation GPU's, your SLI system is obsolete because it likely won't have HARDWARE features to perform next-generation effects."
      WTF? Then we'll just buy some better graphics cards..... -DOH! I really really have to wonder what you are thinking.

  20. IEEE by tsvk · · Score: 5, Funny

    Motherboard: Asus A8N-SLI Premium nForce4 SLI Audio, GB-LAN, IEEE, USB, PCI-E, SATAII w/RAID, DDR-400, ATX

    Wow, there's an Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers integrated on the motherboard? No wonder it's such an expensive setup...

    1. Re:IEEE by Flyskippy1 · · Score: 1

      IEEE-1394. It's Firewire

    2. Re:IEEE by CaseyB · · Score: 1
      That just means that implements ALL of the IEEE standards.

      It's good to know that its nuclear power plant can survive an earthquake.

  21. There's Nothing Cool about Creative by TheStonepedo · · Score: 1

    Creative made good cards back in the Soundblaster 16 days. Since then, other companies have offered cards with better I/O jacks and similar if not better sound quality. If the product boasted "M-Audio Audiophile 192" or "Chaintech AV710" it would have good sound rather than cool branding.

    --
    I'll be your candy shop of infinite deliciousity if you'll be my discotheque of endless rump-shaking.
    1. Re:There's Nothing Cool about Creative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a musician, I can say Creative is still the standard in audio quality for PCs. I've tried other cards, especially on board audio (usually Realtek). Sometimes they may have the same IO, but the quality is not nearly there. Additionally, using a Creative card as opposed to on-board tends to speed up the system. I don't know why this is, but I certainly saw frame rates go up when received my audigy 2 zs. I have M-Audio studiophile speakers, and didn't think the quality could get much better until I received the card. The M-Audio equivalent card is much more expensive, and questionably as good.

      Ironically, I would argue around the original Sound Blaster days the creative product was not the best, but it seemed to have the top driver support (which is still a plus of the card).

    2. Re:There's Nothing Cool about Creative by etymxris · · Score: 1

      For Linux, the emu10k1 (SB Live!, Audigy) chip is one of the few that supports hardware mixing out of the box. Until linux apps all standardize on the same sound server, or until the kernel starts doing its own mixing, this will be a huge selling point.

    3. Re:There's Nothing Cool about Creative by FrostedChaos · · Score: 1

      The parent poster was talking about other cards, not about on-board audio. Of course on-board audio is going to suck for musicians and audiophiles, since it's the lowest-end, cheapest solution.

      And creative's drivers are a huge mess. I remember for the SBLive, they forced me to install about a hundred megs of useless crap in order to get at the driver. And once I finally had the driver, it was no model of stability.

      Creative was also known for playing fast and loose with the PCI spec on their SBLives, which caused headaches for a lot of people, including me. Maybe they're gotten better since then, but I still wouldn't recommend them.

      --
      "Any connection between your reality and mine is purely coincidental." -Slashdot
    4. Re:There's Nothing Cool about Creative by justforaday · · Score: 1

      As a musician, I can say Creative is still the standard in audio quality for PCs.

      You can stop right there. If you're using 1/8" miniplugs for any serious audio work, you clearly don't know what you're talking about...

      --
      I'll turn into a supernova and burn up everything. Well I'll turn into a black little hole and you'll turn into string.
    5. Re:There's Nothing Cool about Creative by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      Ironically, I would argue around the original Sound Blaster days the creative product was not the best,

      Indeed. Turtle Beach was where it was at for serious musical work. IIRC, they were the first ones to add wavetable synthesis to their cards for serious MIDI work.

      The only reason why everyone used Creative Sound Blasters were:

      1. They were cheap
      2. They could do digital effects in addition to FM synthesis (a step up from Adlib)
      3. They were the "standard" used by all video games. Good luck getting Apogee shareware to recognize a Turtle Beach.

      Creative really didn't manage a superior product until the Awe32. The Awe32 was so successful (again, because it was cheaper than many of the other high-end cards) that it pretty much wiped out the rest of the market. That was also about the time that I stopped caring about which sound card I used. I still have an Awe32 in the PIII I just retired. :-)

    6. Re:There's Nothing Cool about Creative by Mauz · · Score: 1

      While there still is the "standard" problem to work around, I much prefer to use Turtle Beach cards when I am setting up a system to do recording on the cheap. The sound quality is much better than higher spec'ed Creative products. It helps that Audacity seems to have no problem working with Turtle Beach cards under XP Profession.

    7. Re:There's Nothing Cool about Creative by HazE_nMe · · Score: 2, Informative

      My friend's Audigy 2 ZS Platinum has more than just a slew of 1/8" miniplugs on the front bay.
      Headphone Out (1/4" Stereo Jack)
      Line In 1 (1/4" Stereo Jack , shared with Microphone In with Gain Control)
      Line In 2 (1/4" Stereo Jack)
      Line In 3 (2x RCA Jack)
      Optical SPDIF In/Out
      Coaxial SPDIF In/Out
      Digital Out for 5.1 support (6-channel SPDIF Output to Creative digital speakers)
      MIDI In / Out
      With the ASIO 2.0 drivers for low latency (as low as 2ms) multi-track playback and recording at 16-bit/48kHz or 24-bit/96kHz, we have even been able to do a little multi-track recording for their band.
      If you think that all Audigy cards only come with the old 1/8" miniplugs, then you clearly don't know what you're talking about...

    8. Re:There's Nothing Cool about Creative by justforaday · · Score: 1

      I am well aware that there have been breakout boxes for a few of the highend Creative cards which can give you decent results. However, his statement was implying that Creative is the standard for musicians recording on PCs, which it very simply is not.

      --
      I'll turn into a supernova and burn up everything. Well I'll turn into a black little hole and you'll turn into string.
    9. Re:There's Nothing Cool about Creative by Malor · · Score: 2, Insightful

      All of the SBLive and Audigy cards do an internal resample from 44.1Khz to 48khz. If you're listening on good gear, this really screws the sound up. Unless you can stay at 48khz from source to delivery, you DO NOT want to route sound through an Audigy if you really care about the quality.

      The Audiotrak Prodigy and M-Audio Revolution 7.1 are both solid cards, with better DACs than the Audigy has, and they don't do the 48khz butchering. If you drive them with ASIO or kernel streaming, you can get true lossless output.

      For whatever weird reason, the M-Audio Sonica Theater, if you configure it for 44.1Khz out, will do perfect lossless output even on normal programs like iTunes or Windows Media Player. Somehow, it avoid Windows' kmixer and sends an undamaged bitstream. Using that card, you can play a DTS-encoded .WAV file over fiber or coax to your stereo, even with iTunes or WMP, and have it sound perfect.

      It's very hard to get really good sound out of Windows... if your sound education has been on a computer, chances are extremely high that you don't yet know very much. It was certainly a learning curve for me.... at this point, at least I know I'm ignorant.

    10. Re:There's Nothing Cool about Creative by Shanep · · Score: 1

      Creative made good cards back in the Soundblaster 16 days.

      Do you rekon? I thought the SB 16 and all it's various versions sucked. Their SNR specs seemed pretty, umm, lets say... creative?

      I loved my Gravis Ultrasound. Kinda like an SB AWE32, except many years before its time. A bad time actually. It did not have great SB compatibility and died off before SB compatibility meant nothing (Win95).

      I think Creative overall, sucks. I can't see how they can survive for much longer, when decent non-SB audio often comes standard. I won't miss them.

      --
      War crimes, torture, lies, illegal spying... Would someone give Bush a blowjob, already, so he can be impeached?
    11. Re:There's Nothing Cool about Creative by Retric · · Score: 1

      Can you realy tell the diference in a blind test? Aka have some guy flip a coin and you test either setup A: iTunes though an Audigy card or B: iTunes though an M-Audio Sonica Theater setup. (Repeating 10 times so you can find out if their just guessing.)

      PS: The only reasons I ask is I have bet people that just picked up high end stero cables to take this type of test and for the most part they fail.

    12. Re:There's Nothing Cool about Creative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      F'en lying audiophiles. I'm so tired of it. You can not tell the difference between anything.

    13. Re:There's Nothing Cool about Creative by Malor · · Score: 1

      Well, I don't have any good way to do one. I CAN say that wben I was using the Audigy 2 NX on my HTPC to drive my good stereo, I was very unhappy with the sound. The treble was awful. For a long time, I thought it was the speakers. DVDs sounded great, but CDs always sucked.

      I had picked up the Sonica Theater when I was experimenting with the Mac Mini as an HTPC (no damn good, as it turns out), and hooked it up to the HTPC just to see what it sounded like. I was immediately floored by the difference. It was night and day... the treble finally sounded right, and I finally could really enjoy my front system for music. All those months I thought it was the speakers, and it was actually the sound card at fault.

      To give you a data point, I can sometimes hear a difference between a CD and a LAME encoding with --preset-standard. With --preset-extreme, I've never been able to hear any difference, at least on Sennheiser HD600s on an amplifier, driven by an an iPod. (I've never done that test through the speaker system, though.) I have reasonably good ears, but I'm no audiophile. And the difference between the 2NX and the Sonica Theater was very, very pronounced on solid midrange audio gear.

      You'll see many people say that the M-Audio cards or the Audiotrak Prodigy "sound better for music", but they're almost never clear about why. Well, I believe this is why... that horrible 48khz resample.

  22. Learn how RAID works... by ErMaC · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why does Hemos think that backing things up to a RAID0 which is "slower" is a convenient thing?

    RAID0 is FASTER than a single drive configuration, because you're doubling the number of spindles and heads working together. It also offers NO REDUNDANCY so backing up anything to a RAID0 is completely and utterly retarded. He's got everything ass-backwards.

    This is why reviews on Slashdot are moronic, whether it's Zork's misinformed and useless game reviews or hardware reviews by the tech-uneducated editors. Stick to linking to real review sites guys, please.

    Now watch in a day there will be a Slashdot story linking to Hemos's review...

    --
    "I want to get more into theory, because everything works in theory." -John Cash
    1. Re:Learn how RAID works... by WillerZ · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Speaking of moronic, where did the "ass-backwards" come from? Surely ass-forwards is a more unconventional orientation?

      --
      I guess today is a passable day to die.
    2. Re:Learn how RAID works... by Guysmiley777 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      RAID-0 is not automatically faster than a single drive, especially with a crappy integrated RAID controller.

      --
      Coding with assembly is like playing with Legos. Coding an application in assembly is like building a car with Legos.
    3. Re:Learn how RAID works... by XaXXon · · Score: 1

      "Why didn't somebody *tell* me my ass was so big?!?"

    4. Re:Learn how RAID works... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its an expression for "fucked up". He didn't invent it.

    5. Re:Learn how RAID works... by WillerZ · · Score: 1

      It still doesn't make any sense...

      --
      I guess today is a passable day to die.
    6. Re:Learn how RAID works... by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      RAID0 is FASTER than a single drive configuration, because you're doubling the number of spindles and heads working together.

      On top of that, it's apparently faster for some things, but not others. There was a big showdown between Storage Review and some other site over this. I think what was happening is that the raw bandwidth improves but the latency doesn't.

    7. Re:Learn how RAID works... by xouumalperxe · · Score: 1

      the slower part about the RAID system was the part where they are 7200 rpm drives rather than studly 10k drives like the primary one is. And he said slower, but RAIDed drives. As in, the actual drives are slower, but that's ok because we're using a RAID0 set that means that we actually make it be a wee bit faster. Being RAID0, it'll look like a 500GB drive. 500 gigs is a fine storage drive. Problem is, people tend to use storage and backup interchangeably. And Hemos apparently fits into the category of "people". Oh, please note that I do agree that using a RAID0 system as main storage is retarded

  23. SLI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what a goddamn joke. SLI now is just as good an idea as it was back when 3DFX came up with it in the first place. Which is to say not a good idea at all.

  24. SLI worth it? by Godeke · · Score: 1

    Was any testing of SLI vs non SLI mode done? The tests I have seen really don't show the performance boost that SLI's added cost would seem to warrant. (The results I have seen are about a 25% speed increase for the SLI mode vs single card.)

    Frankly, I have grown tired of the constant quest for minor speed increases and find myself playing more and more on consoles and less with "driver of the week" PC games. (Revoke my geek badge if you want). Consoles have eye-sandpaper graphics compared to a high end PC, but it's nice to spend a fraction of what you would spend on a single video card and have a complete system that you can just plop down in front of and it just works.

    --
    Sig under construction since 1998.
    1. Re:SLI worth it? by LurkerXXX · · Score: 1
      Was any testing of SLI vs non SLI mode done? The tests I have seen really don't show the performance boost that SLI's added cost would seem to warrant.

      Why would they test that? When you are dumping $5,000 on a gaming system, why bother skimping on a few hundred bucks? Getting an extra 25% framerate for under a tenth of the cost of the machine? Sure!

      Besides, if he only had one video card it would mean his penis would be smaller. ;) (I kid, I kid. I'd buy dual cards too if I had silly amounts of disposable income.)

  25. 5000 by Daveznet · · Score: 1

    Damn $5000 for a gaming machine!!!! Games out now cant even utilize all that hardware, what would be the point? Well maybe they are preparing for duke nukem for ever, when if it comes out?

    --
    GL HF!
  26. Warranty? by moorcito · · Score: 2, Insightful

    For $5000, you'd think the warrenty would be a bit longer than 6 months. I realize that tech gets old pretty fast, but aren't they being a bit optimistic that in 6 months you'll realize how old school your PC had become and fork over another $5000.

    1. Re:Warranty? by ettlz · · Score: 1

      That's what stuck out when I read this. I've had machines for GBP 750 with two and three year warranties. Six months? Doesn't exactly inspire confidence in their build quality, particularly as experience tells me most faults show up towards the end of the first year of working life.

    2. Re:Warranty? by thenefariousone · · Score: 1

      Agreed.

      Even the cheapest of computer components in Canada come with a one year (manufacturer) warranty standard.

      After six months whoever's buying this thing will be upgrading it anyways or can easily replace the whole thing if it breaks, so while it sounds rediculous, it's not a big deal to them.

      But to me - a top of the line, spare no expense toy, with this kind of warranty, doesn't inspire confidence in the quality of the product. Burn in or no burn in.

      A new ferrari wouldn't come with that kind of warranty.

      --
      http://hughgordon.com/
  27. Actually... by EzInKy · · Score: 1

    ...even though this is obviously a blantant advertisement Monarch is one of the sites I've been looking at for the dual opteron system I'm planning on building so I'm looking forward to hearing some honest feedback. In the past I've always just bought my parts seperately for my single CPU machines and assembled them without much hassle but my investment has never been much more than four or five hundred dollars but now that I"m thinking about investing $1500 it would be nice to know the motherboard, processors, and ram have all been tested to work together.

    --
    Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
    1. Re:Actually... by Immercenary_2000 · · Score: 0

      Check out aberdeen (www.aberdeeninc.com) Their selection isn't what it used to be but when I built my last computer, I picked out a mobo, case, processor, ram, and psu from them and they sent it preassembled and tested in the case. The rest of the parts I already had laying around (hard drives and such). I used to just buy parts and put it together myself, but i'm too lazy for that these days. (Not affiliated with aberdeen in any way, just someone who has been buying stuff from them for a few years)

    2. Re:Actually... by kaschei · · Score: 1

      I worked there over the summer, they built hundreds of dual opteron systems (most for a single client). They assemble the computer, update the firmware/drivers, memtest it overnight, and if you buy the OS with the computer do a software install including testing LAN, external ports, audio, video, and stress tests.

      I don't know what they do when you don't buy an OS, except that they can still test the external (case-provided) usb/audio ports. I think they do load an OS to test the a/v/LAN but that was never my job so I'm not positive what happens.

      --
      I should not talk so much about myself if there were anybody else whom I knew as well. -Henry David Thoreau
  28. No X-Fi? by elbenito69 · · Score: 1

    Creative's new X-Fi cards have been sitting on Best Buy's shelves for over a month now, yet they still can't find their way into $5000 computers?

  29. RAID != Backup or Data Security by Anm · · Score: 2, Funny

    One of the other features that I liked is the fast primary drive, and back-up, slower, but RAIDed drives.

    Hemos, I won't be tresting that RAID-0 to backup anything. It is strictly a user feature so you can claim you have a really big dic^Hsk.

    Anm

  30. What data do gamers have? by TheTranceFan · · Score: 1

    All their data can be recovered by reinstalling from the game CDs. ;-)

    1. Re:What data do gamers have? by eclipser13 · · Score: 1

      Except for the ever-precious save game files that you sunk 40+ hours into

    2. Re:What data do gamers have? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except for the ever-precious save game files that you sunk 40+ hours into

      Doesn't anyone do periodic backups at home? I have my files periodically mirrored across 7 different machines, including 3 different architectures and 4 different OS' (minimizing loss due to malicious software), plus the same to various removable USB and FW storage, in addition to regular proper backups to removable media to cover the cases that mirroring does not (user stuff-up which propagates to all mirrors).

      At any one moment, an off-line mirror and seperate backup no older than 24 hours is also outside of my home and my most important files are attached to my person on a 1GB USB stick.

      I got burned severely once. Unison is great.

  31. my problems with that system by brennz · · Score: 1

    Monarch has a quality reputation, but I have a few problems with that system. In order to build a true screamer, I think some component changeouts and modifications are in order.

    Motherboard:
    http://www.tyan.com/products/html/thunderk8we.html This motherboard supports dual opterons, so you can stick in there 2 dual core opterons. Using processor affinity you could balance load across processors (I am not sure if you can use processor affinity per core - if anyone can answer that, I'd appreciate it.

    Ramdrive
    http://www.anandtech.com/storage/showdoc.aspx?i=24 80&p=1 These things are mainstream now (for those that lusted for years after the highend $10k+ ramdrives).

    Soundcard
    Creative Soundblaster based sound cards have had buggy drivers for as long as I can remember. Lets get some turtle beach in there, or better yet, some lower end audiophile hardware http://www.m-audio.com/index.php

    Paltry amount of Ram
    2 GB is like the lowest amount of ram I'd use for a highend performance system. 4 GB - 8 GB is more like the appropriate number. When I am running WoW, VLC, Thunderbird, Firefox, Gimp, TS, and Eric3 all at once. I want them all to be fast and responsive as if I had only one application running.

    1. Re:my problems with that system by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      When I am running WoW, VLC, Thunderbird, Firefox, Gimp, TS, and Eric3 all at once. I want them all to be fast and responsive as if I had only one application running.

      And 4GB of ram won't help that.

      Fucking newbs. You want a high performance box and then you put windows on it?

      HAIL SATAN!

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    2. Re:my problems with that system by dukerobillard · · Score: 1
      In order to build a true screamer...dual opterons

      For gaming, dual Opterons will actually be slower than a single Athlon FX-57. Games are single threaded, so clock-speed and cache are the thing.

      If you plan to play a DVD while uncompressing a 4 GB tar file and compiling a new kernel, well, then dual dual-core Opterons are your boy.

    3. Re:my problems with that system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      This motherboard supports dual opterons, so you can stick in there 2 dual core opterons. Using processor affinity you could balance load across processors (I am not sure if you can use processor affinity per core - if anyone can answer that, I'd appreciate it.


      Opterons make worse gaming processors than Athlons FX due to higher latency of the registered RAM they require. Also, dual core processors have lower clockspeed than single. Most games aren't multithreaded (and there are reasons for it), so that additional processors would be idling (at best, running the background system jobs).

      All in all, the fastest single core processor is the best you can get for gaming.
    4. Re:my problems with that system by brennz · · Score: 1

      It is true that a single Athlon FX-57 is faster when running just one application, without taking into consideration performance tuning and processor affinity.

      However, many modern gamers are running a great deal of applications.
      Teamspeak, game, browser, gamepad software, mouse software, etc. Quickly your common performance tests from *insert_tech_site* are invalid.

      Dual processor systems have a kind of zip to them that is very noticeable, even when under heavier loads.

    5. Re:my problems with that system by brennz · · Score: 1

      While I would prefer to use Linux as my x86 gaming OS, I can't because many titles I play are unavailable, and WINE compatibility isn't there yet. I could use VMware and totally kill performance for some of these titles, but I am not that much of a masochist.

      Calling someone a newb when talking about OS choices gaming system is somewhat ignorant to say the least. My servers may run Linux/freebsd, but my gaming system will be Windows (until popular titles start shipping on Linux). Yes, I am aware of OSX and I have no plans to switch.

    6. Re:my problems with that system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      egotistical elitist prick

    7. Re:my problems with that system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Take a look at the ramdrive review on Tom's Hardware if you haven't already. Included was the access time benchmark and running 2 of those cards in a raid 0. The access time was practically nil, and the raid benchmark gave yet another major significant speed boost. I'm really interested in this.

    8. Re:my problems with that system by GA400 · · Score: 1

      So customize it and select an X2 4800 instead.

  32. Re:The Bare Minimum -- Cost to Enthusiasts? by ackthpt · · Score: 4, Interesting
    "Ah, part of the TCO equation! But, heck, you should be able to buy this system for $3000 a year from now. Funny how this pricing reminds me of what it cost to have 1 PC XT with MS-DOS on it back in the mid-eighties."
    Computing for enthusiats has never been cheap ;)

    Who said anything about enthusiasts? I'm actually puzzled the moderations are leaning towards funny, because I really was trying to make a non-humourous point. It's perhaps funny-ironic, the ultimate system will hardly be the minimum for the next OS release from the vender most people get their work/entertainment environment from.

    That mid-eighties box, which cost about $3,000 was about a mid to high end model, it had a faster clock, 20 MB HD and a Hercules video card. It was the bare minimum to do work, most of which was running a terminal emulator, but the rest was some work in Turbo C

    You can buy a very capable system for $300 at Fry's right now. There's a large gulf between capable for today's OS releases and the one coming out in a year. The big question is, how many suckers are going to bite?

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  33. Why I love Monarch by nothingx · · Score: 1

    I've bought from Monarch several times in the past and it's always been a really good experience. I've never had a system made by them, but I get all my parts there. The service is like something you would expect from a big name retailer, but prices much better. You don't have to take my word for it though, check out what other people have to say on reseller ratings.

  34. Maybe... by JohnnyBigodes · · Score: 1

    ... if Monarch Computers had put *that* machine as their web-server, maybe we could still reach their site :)

  35. $5000, I can see that. by GmAz · · Score: 0

    Well, my system is as follows: AMD64 (Winchester) 3200+ DFI Lanparty Ultra D (Easy mod to get SLI) 1GB Geil Ultra Platinum EVga 6800GT PCI-E Koolance Water Cooling Lite-On DL DVD Burner Plextor DVD Burner and some other cool do-dads in there. That system ended up costing me over a timeperiod of about 1 and a half years....$4000

    --
    Click Click Bloody Click PANCAKES!
  36. What website is this again? by borodir · · Score: 1

    Are we on Slashdot? or some generic review site? Thanks

    --
    Check it Out http://aarondavidson.com
    1. Re:What website is this again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Couldn't agree more...except that it is not even a reasonable review. It is shallow and clearly an advertising ploy for a lame assembly company with a web site that screams "we are two guys in a garage!".

      5000 beans? Give me a break. Build a system for 1200 bucks and save the other 3800...and get a system that will perform great for two years. In two years, spend another 1200 and get a system that blows away that overpriced beast....and still have money in your pocket.

      Seriously, if you need a system with a custom paint job, you really need to evaluate your priorities...unless you have a Ferrari parked in front of your oceanside mansion. As far as I am concerned, my PC should be invisible...and should be quiet and decent performing...which I can get with a Shuttle barebones that I can build for 1000 beans...and it will be a GREAT gamin machine.

      The first clue that this PC is ridiculous and optimized for folks with whacked priorities (i.e., folks who spend more time bragging about their 3D mark score than time actually USING their PC) was the inclusion of RAID 0. What a joke.

    2. Re:What website is this again? by kaschei · · Score: 1

      They're not two guys in a garage, they're 20 people in a 95 degree warehouse, slaving 8-11 sweltering hours a day to make all the spoiled children of the world happy THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

      (I worked there over the summer, and yes: the temperature was often 90-100'F inside the warehouse)

      --
      I should not talk so much about myself if there were anybody else whom I knew as well. -Henry David Thoreau
  37. Benchmark request by ChrisF79 · · Score: 3, Funny

    If the original poster is reading this, could you do me a favor and run an Excel benchmark on it, since that's what I'd be using it for?

    Get back to me with the results ASAP... the bank just approved my $5k loan.

    --
    Finance tutorials and more! Understandfinance
  38. um.... it's another fast computer.... by iamhassi · · Score: 1
    i read that review and all i see is another fast computer. 6 months from now there will be another fast computer, and 6 months after that and so on.

    this isnt news for nerds, it's not even news. Something that happens on a regular basis and that we all know about (that computers get faster!) is not newsworthy.

    --
    my karma will be here long after I'm gone
  39. Kickbacks? by FreeUser · · Score: 1

    OK, I've been a long time slashdot reader (note my userid), and while editorial standards have been slipping noticably over the last year or two, this advertisiement posing as a review really takes the cake.

    Is your employer getting paid outright for these, or are they a result of personal kickbacks under the table?

    Ugh. I'm just about through with this site.

    --
    The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
  40. SlashAds? by cepler · · Score: 1

    So, how do we turn off these SlashAd articles and get down to the REAL stuff? Is that something only available to subscribers or do they see this crap too?

    Come on, a review of YET ANOTHER CLONE SYSTEM (Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzz). Yawn, boring. Ho Hum. Is this really news that matters? Who gives a crap about some expensive custom system made by a vendor....geeze...

    Hello? Editors? Are you awake or does just any old submission make it to the front page these days?

  41. No liquid cooling? by Man+from+Trantor · · Score: 1

    I just built a new gaming rig (P4 775) and come to the conclusion that liquid cooling is no longer a just a fancy option for over clockers. When the cooler get up to full song it almost impossible to hear anything else. I'm now saving my pennies to retrofit nice quiet liquid cooler. In rig like this it should be standard. (especially with a $5000 price tag...)

    --
    <!-- /. bot -->
    while(!am) r2();
  42. Imagine a beo... by Guysmiley777 · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... I can't even do it. I tried, I really did.

    --
    Coding with assembly is like playing with Legos. Coding an application in assembly is like building a car with Legos.
  43. USB Ports on front of case by Dare+nMc · · Score: 1

    why is their no short circuit protection on the front USB straite from the MB? mulitple motherboards I have used crash hard with a short to these, the K8VM800 I am using now, included. I guess this is another feature for the hacker, can have the PC reboot automatically when you plug in your bootable usb fob.

    because of that I only want the powered front USB hub (which this system appears to have in addition) in the drive bay.
    would be nice if they would allow a hardrive to share the same bay though.

  44. Monarch is great by IIEluSiONII · · Score: 1

    Just a comment about Monarch. I have been buying stuff from them for years. They aren't the cheapest place in town (but they are still compeditive)and I have had nothing but good fortune with them their PC's are solid and last a long time. Just a shout out! As a disclaimer I am not a paid advertiser, just a stoked customer!

    --
    ~@~
  45. Already /.'ed.. by bezgin · · Score: 0

    They should have used a few of this machines as webserver.. :) But no, people take best of best hardware for gaming and outdated crap for LAMP-Servers, so they can crash at with first wave of potential customers, a very intelligent way of exploiting the 15-Minutes-Slashdot-Fame.

    --
    exit();
  46. huh? by no+reason+to+be+here · · Score: 3, Funny

    I thought The Monarch's nemesis was Dr. Venture.

    [DRTFA]

    1. Re:huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not going to flush the toilet. Let the feel the wrath of the Monarch!

  47. too much money by Hrvat · · Score: 1

    Why, oh why would you need so much power to game? I build my computer 2 years ago for something like $1500 (maybe less, I can't remember now). I went to arsTechnica, looked at their Hot Rod system guide of the month and plonked a better graphics card in there.

    I am still playing games on it, including BF2, Half Life 2, Doom 3 (ok, I no longer play it, but I did play it when it came out. It would have sucked more if it didn't look so pretty).

    I might have to go and upgrade my graphics card soon (I got ATI Radeon 9800 non-pro) and maybe my processor (P4 2.6Ghz) in another 6 - 12 months if I want to stay current.

    --
    TANSTAAFL
  48. Department of Redundancy Department by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 2, Funny

    RAID0 should properly be called an AID. But people will just call it an "AID Array", which is redundant as the A in AID already stands for Array. So then the R becomes appropriate again.

    --
    You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
    1. Re:Department of Redundancy Department by rocket97 · · Score: 1

      heh.. made me laugh thanks... I needed it with the way my day is going today.

      --
      "The two most abundant elements in the universe are hydrogen and stupidity." -Harlan Ellison
  49. price point by fusionsquared · · Score: 0

    After buying and owning Apple systems my whole life, I'd have to say that my Monarch system I bought a couple years ago was the cheapest and fastest computer I have ever owned. Still is.

  50. Obviously 1284 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    They must be talking about the IEEE-1284 parallel (aka printer) port.

    No computer is complete without one.

  51. I have bought a PC From Monarch by MBraynard · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I have three comments on the PC I bought. It actually is not much worse than the machine in the review but only cost about 1800.

    1) Their prices are about as good as those you find on pricewatch for components.

    2) I had a tech issue and they did respond to me. It was my error. They also seemed to be helpful on their forums.

    3) They claim to do a burnin but they did not - I know because of the progress reports on the website and because the MB I have records how much time it has been on. They may have reset the HD counter - it showed only 6 hours - but there progress reports did not allow enough time for it to burn in as long as they say it would.

    4) I would probably buy from them again.

  52. From the 'More acronyms = $$$' dep't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why is X so important in equipment? And why would anyone buy a 'Nemesis'? Don't you know what that means? Isn't that proclaiming it's relationship to your wallet?

  53. 4 sticks DDR400? by LarsG · · Score: 1

    I don't think the nforce4 is normally capable of running 4 sticks faster than DDR333. Are those RAM sticks specifically certified for running 4*400 on that particular motherboard?

    --
    If J.K.R wrote Windows: Puteulanus fenestra mortalis!
    1. Re:4 sticks DDR400? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is not dependent on the chipset, but the core revision of the A64. The latest cores (e.g. Venice) can do 4x400.

    2. Re:4 sticks DDR400? by c0l0 · · Score: 1

      With the Athlon 64, the chipset itself gives a crap about how many DIMM-Slots are used (or not), since the memory controller is on-DIE for AMD's latest generation of chips. However, older revisions of the AMD Athlon 64 (before the cores named Venice, San Diego, Manchester etc., those supporting SSE3 and being manufactured in 0.09) did not OFFICIALLY support 4 populated DIMM-banks at PC3200 speeds, but just 2700. You could had have been lucky back then, and it might just had have worked, but with Venice and Co., those problems are gone.
      It's still highly unlikely to get the memory working at 1T Read/Write-Turnaround rates, though.

      --
      :%s/Open Source/Free Software/g

      YTARY!
  54. Had to be said... by neuroking · · Score: 1

    Is Soviet Russia, slow news day finds you!

  55. ALL GAMES by Kjuib · · Score: 1

    It's not that any one game takes that much juice.. it's that you can run them all at the same time. That is why someone would want a system like this.. to run ALL GAMES at once... yup... sure is...

    --
    - Your stupidity got you into this mess, why can't it get you out? -Will Rogers
  56. Re:My favortie board (Mod Parent Up) by AKAImBatman · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Thank you. Can someone give this fellow some mod points? :-)

  57. Website failure by Moo+Moo+Cow+of+Death · · Score: 1

    Here I am detailing my new computer specs and suddenly the next page doesn't load. That's ok, I go back and try to refresh it. I check Slashdot, low and behold, an article linking to Monarch on the first page.

    R.I.P. Monarch server

  58. SLI is kinda cool, and is not just for gaming =) by Chitlenz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    We work a lot with voodoopc in creating our 3d workstations for Radiologists, and have noted that SLI in "broken" mode does indeed produce 4 monitors' worth of 3d acceleration (with this particular motherboard at least). I'm typing this on exactly the same setup, but with 6800Gt's instead of the new 7800gt's, but I have to say that once you warm up to 60 inches of desktop there's no going back, ESPECIALLY for developers. Every once in awhile I'll kick the whole thing back to SLI mode and play WOW too, and man the result is amazing. It's not so much how high a resolution you can get to as it is how fluid you can make a game, if you follow me =)

    -chitlenz

    --
    Imagination is the silver lining of Intelligence.
  59. Difference between a rig and a PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    This model is a top-of-the-line gaming rig

    It's only a rig if you built it yourself. If you buy it prebuilt it is a PC.

  60. Uh. Typo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nemesis FX-57 8700 SLI Gaming ..isn't that 7800, and not 8700?

    Meh

  61. Fuck my bum! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow! I was reading the fucking specs and I couldn't believe anyone would waste so much cunting money on playing shitty games.

    What the cunting fuckshit does any cunt-fuckhole need two fucking video cards for?

  62. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  63. I want the shipping container! by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 1

    From the Monarch page

    Shipping Weight: 13.00 pounds

    Ultra light: 6.8 kg (14 lbs)

    I'd like to get hold of that shipping container! Make it a lot of them. I wonder what the shipping weight of the shipping container is ...

  64. Boring...Outdated... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Console gaming is the only way to go...Come back when there is a 7 cell processor in this box for under 500 bucks.

  65. FX-57/4800+ by mobby_6kl · · Score: 2, Insightful

    A friend of mine asked me to help chose components for his next PC, and, not paying attention to the prices, we (actually, 'I' would be more appropriate) decided on a single 7800GTX and X2-4800+ instead of two cards in SLI and FX-57. Although the possibility of adding a second gfx card still remains, we decided to only buy one card. It would always be possible to buy a second one, or throw the current one out and buy next gen card which would grind two of these into dust anyway.

    Now, FX-57 usually beats the X2-4800+ in games, but by a rather small margin: 5-6fps was the most significant difference. What makes the difference is adding a background task, like file compression or Skype or whatever. FX-57 drops almost in half (if the task is significant), while the X2 only slows down by 3-5fps. Hopefully game developers will take advantage of all the additional cores and the X2 would be even better in the future.

    The whole system cost about $2500, including a quality case and PSU, two 250gb drives and all the other stuff necessary.

    1. Re:FX-57/4800+ by KillShill · · Score: 1

      around this time, ati/nvidia are optimizing for multi-core cpus in their drivers. so soon you'll be able to get much more performance from your slightly-slower 4800+ than a single fx57.

      --
      Science : Proprietary , Knowledge : Open Source
    2. Re:FX-57/4800+ by Khyber · · Score: 1

      I'd like to add something to this.

      Generally, in a multi-core config, in Windows 2000, you can tell which programs to run on which processors. Just right click and go explore, it's there. Did it on my old dual-500 mhz Celeron tower. Fruity Loops 3.56 on one, Cool Edit 2.0 on the other.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  66. Newegg Cost by DnemoniX · · Score: 2, Informative

    Just out of sheer morbid curiousity I priced this out on Newegg, grand total minus shipping and any applicable tax was $3,702.95 not a bad mark-up they have going there. But if you put it together yourself you won't get the swanky paintjob. But then again you won't get the retarded disk configuration either.

    Thermaltake Shark Tower Black - $169.00
    Enermax Noisetaker EG701AX-VE-SFMA ATX 2.0 - $149.99
    Asus A8N-SLI Premium nForce4 SLI - $175.00
    AMD Athlon 64 FX-57 (939) - $1,011
    Zalman CNPS7000-CU Copper CPU Fan - $42.99
    4 x Corsair w/LED Display (TWINX1024-3200XLPRO) - $430
    1 x Western Digital 74 GB SATA 10K Raptor (WD740GD) - $183.00
    2 x Western Digital Caviar SE 250 GB SATAII 16MB Cache 7200 RPM (WD2500KS) - $237.98
    Plextor PX-716SA DVD±RW 16x8x16x DVD+RW 48x24x48x CD-RW SATA - $116.99
    Mitsumi Floppy 7-in-1 USB Card Reader/Smart Media Drive (Black) - $21.00
    2 x NVIDIA Geforce 7800 GTX 256MB GDDR3, VIVO/, Dual-DVI - $928.00
    Creative Labs Audigy 2 ZS Platinum INT Drive Sound - $176.00
    D-Link DWL-AG530 Tri-Mode Dualband (2.4/5GHz) Wireless 108Mbps PCI Adapter - $62.00

    1. Re:Newegg Cost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you serious with this??? You kinda missed some things there bud. Plus it is newegg so zero presale customer support, zero tech support, zero care for customers. Newegg just sees you as a $$$$ not a customer

    2. Re:Newegg Cost by DnemoniX · · Score: 1

      I didn't miss anything. I have been purchasing from Newegg regularly for ages and they are hands down the best parts site out there. All I did was list off what you could put this same rig together for yourself. If you need you hand held for pre-sales support, and somebody to wipe your nose for you too, feel free to send me that extra grand, you can call me all you want.

    3. Re:Newegg Cost by GA400 · · Score: 1

      Monarch pricing for individual parts: Thermaltake Shark Full Tower Aluminum Case Series w/Window No PS Black (VA7000BWA) $150.00 Enermax Noisetaker EG701AX-VE-SFMA ATX 2.0 w/SLI Support 600W Power Supply $144.00 Asus A8N-SLI Premium nForce4 SLI Audio/GB-LAN/IEEE1394/USB/PCI-E/SATAII/DDR/ATX 64 939 $179.00 AMD Athlon 64 FX-57 (939) (Retail Box-w-Fan) $1,015.00 Zalman CNPS7000-CU Copper CPU Fan For Intel 478Pin & AMD 64 (Socket754/939/940) $35.00 1 GB (2 pcs 512MB) DDR (400) PC-3200 Corsair w/LED Display (TWINX1024-3200XLPRO) $214.00 (I think you halved the NewEgg price on that. Double-check) Western Digital 74 GB SATA 10K Raptor (WD740GD) $180.00 Western Digital Caviar SE 250 GB SATAII 16MB Cache 7200 RPM (WD2500KS) $121.00 (242) Plextor PX-716SA DVD±RW 16x8x16x DVD+RW 48x24x48x CD-RW SATA (OEM) $140.00 Mitsumi Floppy 7-in-1 USB Card Reader/Smart Media Internal Drive (Black) $25.00 Leadtek GeForce 7800 GTX 256MB DDR3/PCI-E/VIVO/Dual-DVI (Retail Box) $465.00 (930) Creative Labs Audigy 2 ZS Platinum INT Drive Sound $179.00 D-Link DWL-AG530 Tri-Mode Dualband (2.4/5GHz) Wireless 108Mbps PCI Adapter (Retail Box) $72.00 Pricing is pretty comparable no? The extra price comes from labor, burn time (costs money to burn, and from the hand-painted auto-quality paintjob (if you look at their site, they're charging like $400 for the custom painted case)

  67. 7800 GTX x 2 by Karem+Lore · · Score: 1

    Arrrggghhh, pathetic...2 x 7800 GTX cards...pfft, at that price they should be the Ultra...Maybe when we get the Platinum and Extreme versions too they should be the ones in this rig...GTX pfft...

    In fact can we get 7 names:

    7800 Turbo (as in we nick yer system ram but sell cheap)
    7800 LE
    7800 GT
    7800 GTX
    7800 Ultra
    7800 Platinum
    7800 Extreme Edition (or EE)

    Then depending on the version of vista you buy ... Hey, OEM bundling...now there's an idea for MS and NVidia...Lawsuits from ATI...pfft...

    --
    When all is said and done, nothing changes...
  68. Good and bad points by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Counterpoints to the review:

    Power supply. Excellent beast - among the best powersupplies there is, and very quiet for the power (the PC Power & Cooling 510 SLI has a Delta fan in it = loud, the OCZ Powerstream is good if you like LED fans and manually adjustable voltage rails, and there's nothing else in that quality bracket except the nutty PC Power & Cooling 850, and the Enermax Galaxy 1K, and that's more for dualies and graphics workstations). I have the same PSU myself; had to RMA the first one due to the 3.3V line riding at 3.94V, but RMA was extremely swift - the other one is flawless, and I think that speaks better for the quality of the Enermax customer service than it does for the occasional inevitable defect. Good choice.

    Motherboard: I have the exact same motherboard. Flawless (better than the Deluxe model, and the others). Chipset uses a heatpipe, so no chipset fan. SLI doesn't need an edge connector to swap. And it's a good overclocker (second only to the leading DFI, whose higher memory voltages can push it towards the nutty Redline RAM).

    Processor: Nutty overkill, gotta love it. Might hit 3GHz, but maybe not on that heatsink. And no point with that heatsink with SLI; the machine will not be quiet, deal with it, just keep Deltas and Tornados away. Maybe get the FX-55 and overclock it 200MHz and save a whole bundle on cash, and I think the Thermalright XP-120 (which is enormous, but does fit on that board, and cools the heatpipe radiator excellently), and a 120mm Panaflo fan would be better choices. Also, for the same price, you could get a X2 4800+; I know this is billed as a gaming PC, but games *will* be dualcore as it gets more popular, dualcores are just plain smoother to use (even Steam doesn't freeze as much) and if you want a little futureproofing... well, you can still swap it out later, I guess, that's the beauty, and it's a good choice. FX-57: Part of the reason this machine is stupidly expensive.

    Memory: *Poor* choice. Can't run 1T with four sticks. 1GB sticks are decent now, and a matched pair of 1GB sticks will work MUCH better - Corsair have two suitable ones, but I suggest the OCZ Platinum. That way you'll get lower memory timings, and crucially to 1T, which does make a measurable difference in framerate in some games (which tend to like lower latency memory, than clockspeed).

    System HDs: Two Raptors in RAID-0. You can't argue with that; mainstay of many a high end gamer's system; they really reduce load times and improve the performance like you wouldn't believe, and you won't do any better without resorting to SCSI or Fibrechannel, and the Cheetah X15.4 or Maxtor Atlas -- and they cost a bomb, and drop like flies. For those sticklers about "reliability" - don't be stupid, it's the system drive. You need SPEED on the system drive, and RAID-0 delivers - if a drive goes, it goes, you replace it and reinstall Windows or restore from the ghost image you kept on the storage drives, bleh. Your data storage should be the *other* pair. Raptors are very reliable, if they aren't first-week failures, anyway. Good.

    Storage HDs: Not as good a choice. They're cheap. At least the 300s, and I'd have preferred to see the WD Caviar 400GB RAID Edition 2, and maybe in a RAID-1 pair (or just separate). I'd say the Hitachi 7K500s, but they get hot, real hot, and that hints at the possibility of early failure.

    DVD-RW: I can't argue with that, but I can ask which TLA it is. That drive has a spotty history, and isn't always the best (which is really disappointing from Plextor; I look forward to a higher quality drive in future).

    There isn't a CD-RW. That's a mistake, IMHO. DVD-RWs are lacklustre at CD performance, and more easily confused at protection. And this is a gaming PC. Put a Plextor Plexwriter Premium in there, while you still can. Don't ask, just do it. You'll thank me later, when you're ripping audio (your own discs, for personal enjoyment, of course) and making Alcohol images of your game CDs, that the DVD-RW wouldn't touch with a ten foot

  69. RAID by pbrinich · · Score: 1
    "RAID Setup: RAID 0 (Zero) Setup"


    Does it ever annoy anyone else that RAID 0 is considered a Redundant Array of Inexpensive Disks? RAID 0 is not redundant, in fact such an array can be more susceptible to errors. Maybe I'm just weird...
  70. My dealings with Monarch Computers by RedR · · Score: 1

    Heya, I've bought from Monarch before. So all my dealings or orders have had no problems what so ever. What lured me to Monarch was their tech support. I called them years ago to inquire about a new CPU. We talked for about 45min - 1hr. I did not end up buying the CPU at the time. Because of the knowledge and information he gave me, I was able to delay my purchase and get the new revision of the CPU when it released shortly after. I actually got the sense that the tech cared about helping me make the right purchase for me, and not just get a quick sale or say something to get me off the phone, it was awesome and something I've grown use to from all their technicians/sales folk. Perhaps this sounds like I am tooting their whistle and I spose I am in the end. I saw this review on one of their systems, so I felt I should pass on my experiences with Monarch Computers as well with this story/review. Oh, and on topic, heh ya I think this is a bit much of a PC for even someone like me, a dedicated gamer. But then again I'd buy this box in a heart beat if I could afford it. Instead I went with a slightly less of an upgrade to my existing box. AMD64 x2 4400+, 2GB RAM on a very nice MSI SLI board with 2 7800's to put it to good work. I am very happy with the hardware, as well with how Monarch handled this order from start to finish. Enjoy, RedR

    1. Re:My dealings with Monarch Computers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you must work for them

    2. Re:My dealings with Monarch Computers by RedR · · Score: 1

      Nope, but I am getting another order in now.

  71. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  72. Or, for less than $2000... by joranbelar · · Score: 1
    The system I just put together from Newegg:

    • Case: Thermaltake Kandalf VA9000BWS Black Aluminum/Steel ATX Full Tower
    • Power Supply: OCZ Powerstream 520W
    • Motherboard: EPoX nForce4 EP-9NPA+ ULTRA
    • Processor: AMD Athlon 64 X2 4200+
    • Memory: 2GB (2x1GB) OCZ DDR PC3200 Platinum (2-3-2-5)
    • Hard Drives: 2x Western Digital SATA-II 250GB, RAID-0 Setup
    • DVD-RW: NEC Black IDE DVD Burner Model ND-3540A - OEM
    • Video Card: BFG Tech Geforce 7800GTX 256MB GDDR3 PCI Express x16
    • Sound Card: SB Audigy 2 ZS
    • Speakers: Logitech Z-5500 505W 5.1 Speakers

    Final cost: $1900. Is it worth it to spend an extra $3100 for a 10 fps gain in Doom3?

    Final verdict: Build it yourself. You'll be happier and save money.

  73. 1. Read. 2. Think. 3. Post (optional) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting
    The drive configuration:

    Hard Drives: 1 x Western Digital 74 GB SATA 10K Raptor (WD740GD), 2 x Western Digital Caviar SE 250 GB SATAII 16MB Cache 7200 RPM (WD2500KS)

    The review said:

    One of the other features that I liked is the fast primary drive, and back-up, slower, but RAIDed drives. It's nice for installing high access demand apps on the primary, but using the other drives as storage drives.

    ErMaC spewed forth:

    Why does Hemos think that backing things up to a RAID0 which is "slower" is a convenient thing? RAID0 is FASTER than a single drive configuration, because you're doubling the number of spindles and heads working together. It also offers NO REDUNDANCY so backing up anything to a RAID0 is completely and utterly retarded. He's got everything ass-backwards.

    It's quite clear that you did not bother to think about what the review said. The RAIDed drives are 7200 rpm whereas the primary is 10K. So, he was right. The RAIDed drives are slower than the primary. Furthermore, the fact that he said "but RAIDed" suggests a contrast against the relative slowness. It's obvious he understands that even though the drives are slower, the RAID configuration should overcome that.

    Now, the review did say "back-up" drives. Perhaps a poor choice of words, but he goes on to explain: "It's nice for installing high access demand apps on the primary, but using the other drives as storage drives." This suggests that he uses them as regular storage drives. You know, like for normal data storage, not for backing up data.
  74. what? no glxgears fps? by dmouritsendk · · Score: 1

    who cares about 3dmark anyways ;-)

  75. That's more than a dual proc Power Mac G5 by melted · · Score: 1

    That's more than a dual proc Power Mac G5. Pass me the bong, people.

    1. Re:That's more than a dual proc Power Mac G5 by KillShill · · Score: 1

      that dual proc g5 isn't fully loaded.

      it comes with very little ram, little hd space/speed. and a very slow gfx card by default.

      plus you gain x86 native speed.

      apple confirms, ppc is dying. now if they had been smart and let others make ppc mac machines and not tied their os to their hardware, ppc would be much more ubiquitous.

      and no, current benchmarks show that the g5's are slightly slower than current x86 cpus , more so in integer focused apps. floating point is also lower but gets much better with altivec. but the price premium to get a g5 computer is many times a good x86 computer, so the cost-performance ratio is not very favorable.

      apple wants too much profit per machine to make macs feasible for the x86 enthusiast. x86'ers are used to having great performance at rock bottom prices and the ability to mix and match hardware and not to have to buy a brand new machine when they want to upgrade to current gen.

      anyway, enough of that.

      --
      Science : Proprietary , Knowledge : Open Source
  76. /.ed by Dacmot · · Score: 1

    I think they're going to have to use one of their gaming rig as a replacement server because whatever they had before must be fried by now.

  77. The price of computers halves every 18 months by tjlsmith · · Score: 1

    but the one you WANT always costs $2,500 !

    --
    Mumia Abu-Jamal is *laughably guilty*. Check the evidence.
  78. Why by polyp2000 · · Score: 1

    Does it have such a vile looking case? I know it doesnt affect performance but why would I want i ricer nightmare under my desk ? yuck!

    --
    Electronic Music Made Using Linux http://soundcloud.com/polyp
  79. 1T vs 2T by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm probably the 100th guy to comment on this, but running 4 DIMMs on an A64 often (mostly) results in a 2T command rate, which is much slower than 1T command rate (which probably could've been attained with 2*1024MB DIMMs). But, still, it's a pretty fast machine. :-)

  80. run away by netllama · · Score: 1

    Perhaps Monarch builds decent workstations, however their servers are complete crap. I made the huge mistake of purchasing 6 1U servers off of their website from them a year ago. What a nightmare.

    First they sat on the order for 2 weeks and did nothing. When I called to inquire what was going on they told me that they had *never* built the configuration that their website allowed me to order before, and it wasn't going to be possible. Their 'solution' to this problem was to tell me that i'd have to pay $3k more per server to get an equivalent configuration that they could build. I told them, no thanks, i'll take my business elsewhere, and suddenly they caved.

    Wait another 2 weeks without any signs of progress, at which point they tell me that they're having manufacturing delays, and that it would be another week at the most, and that they'd overnight me the hardware. 10 days pass with no updates and no servers. I call and the sales drone tells me that they're having supply chain problems, and that he'll 'upgrade' me for free to a 2U server with the same comonents but I'd have to pay $1k more per server. I tell him no, cancel my order, i've had enough of this bait & switch crap. They offer to throw in 2 extra 145GB SCSI drives per server if I pay $500/server more, and I agree.

    Finally the servers arrive, and of the 6 only one boots at all (with RH9 pre-loaded). The others can't find a boot device. So I figure i'll just reload them, because I don't really want RH9 anyway (I needed RHEL3). I can't install RHEL3, as the Adaptec SCSI controller keeps getting bizarre bus timeouts & resets. I call Monarch's tech suppt to ask WTF? For starters, getting in touch with a human is very difficult. Much of the time I got dumped to vmail and no one ever returned my calls. When I did get a human they were always giving me this story about how there's only one Linux tech on staff and he was either at lunch, or in a meeting, or on the phone with another customer. I demand to talk to a manager, and i'm promised that one will call me the same day. While I'm waiting (with my project now nearly a month behind schedule) I start poking around inside the boxes, and I figure I'll see if Adaptec has any ideas.

    I submit a support request to Adaptec, and I get a call from them 30 minutes later from someone who had many Linux clues. After some troubleshooting we determined that the 64bit PCI slot on the mobo in these servers can't handle the Adaptec SCSI controller (and Adaptec points this out in the errata which Monarch apparently failed to read). I had to move the SCSI controller to a 32 bit PCI slot, which allowed me load RHEL3 without a problem.

    A manager from Monarch did call me back later that day, and was completely useless. I explained how Adaptec figured out the problem, and that this was clearly a failing of Monarch, and that I wanted a refund for selling me servers which couldn't run at their full capacity. Monarch refused to give an inch, and insisted that they had 'burnt in' the servers with RH9 in their factory, and something had to have broken during shipping. I kept pointing out the Adaptec errata to this idiot, and he just kept making excuses. (incidentally, the one server that did boot RH9 had its SCSI card in the 32 bit slot). All Monarch would offer was for me to ship the servers back to them for 'repairs'.

    Never buy servers from Monarch. They are clueless, bumbling idiots.

  81. Be prepared to WAIT...... bad customer service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I ordered a $3600 server from Monarch on August 22. It's way overdue. As of yesterday, my order was only being built!

    The order status page says, "We'll email if you there is any delay." No e-mail, so on the last possible on-time delivery date, I sent an inquiry e-mail which was never acknowledged. It took a phone call and mentioning the BBB to get a reply. They say they are busy with back-to-school rush and they don't want to compromise quality: how about customer service quality?

    Anyway, they eventually re-promised it would be here this week. It's Thursday noon, a full month after ordering, and no server!

    A shipping upgrade doesn't cut it.

    This server was supposed to upgrade our office--about 30 desktops, mostly running Windows 95 on about Pentium I CPUs--to the latest Linux goodness with major upgrades in performance and software. Evolution beats SquirrelMail for sure. OpenOffice.org's slowness is easy to forgive on dual Opterons swimming in RAM.

  82. Re:The Bare Minimum -- Cost to Enthusiasts? by Nutria · · Score: 2, Interesting
    You can buy a very capable system for $300 at Fry's right now. There's a large gulf between capable for today's OS releases and the one coming out in a year.

    That is so right.

    These 3yo specs are still more than sufficient for the vast majority of people, including (non-teenage boy) gamers:
    • Athlon XP 2200+
    • 1GB RAM
    • GeForce 5200
    • On-board audio or a cheap SoundBlaster
    • GNOME 2.10

    Purposefully no mention of disk space, because that need is always growing.
    --
    "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
  83. You guys are totall missing the point by GA400 · · Score: 1

    This system is a flagship model. Just as Chevy produces the Z06 they expect relatively few people to purchase it. Unlike Chevy, however, all Monarch's models have the same kind of care and build quality. The A8N-SLI Premium is problematic when using four sticks of RAM. I like the fatal1ty board from Abit or the DFI LanParty better. As for the Soundblaster, if you don't want it don't order it. This system is totally customizable. You don't have to get the auto-paint chassis the Audigy, or even the dual 7800GTX cards.

    1. Re:You guys are totall missing the point by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      *Or* you could just do what I did and build my own system for far less. With nearly all the parts built into the motherboard these days, it's pretty darn easy (and cheap!) to set up a system.

      Flagship models should border on unattainable for all but the elite rich. The care put into the flagship model then reflects on the rest of a company's line and modify's the customer's opinion of the company. Unfortunately, I don't see anything about this particular machine that's so amazing other than the fact that it has a lot of hardware in it. Well, that and the fact that they picked my favorite board. ;-) But putting that aside, there simply isn't anything "unattainable" about this system other than the high price tag slapped on it. Especially since I chose my "favorite board" because it *is* highly affordable despite its array of powerful features.

      To carry the car analogy a little further, this is the very definition of an unattainable car. :-)

    2. Re:You guys are totall missing the point by Doctor+Memory · · Score: 1

      But Caddys are just so....eeewww. I'd much rather lust after one of these. At least it's theoretically attainable. Now where's that crowd of little people for me to crush ruthlessly to get one....?

      --
      Just junk food for thought...
    3. Re:You guys are totall missing the point by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      605 horsepower? 10 cylinders? No Bvlgari clock? Lame. (With apologies to CmdrTaco.) :-)

    4. Re:You guys are totall missing the point by GA400 · · Score: 1

      Check out the Max PC review of the same system then. Its a pretty serious computer. Also, if you bothered to read this review, you'd notice the quality of assembly is superior.

  84. Who needs reviews for these systems? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Condensed review: This gaming rig, using all the top-of-the-line parts, has great performances with the latest games.

    Whoop-dee-doo. Thanks for the information, couldn't have figured it out myself.

  85. Fuck that computer by TooncesTheCat · · Score: 1

    The real damn question is why are the Slashdot editors advertising for a company that has nothing to do with the news that "matters" to us nerds. I would never buy a computer that was built by someone else. I can build the same PC even if I do not have warehouses full of inventory and can get discounts on certain pieces of hardware. They always charge like 400% more than what the computer is actually worth. I've seen Alienware's and other "gaming extreme" pc's that have been sold @ 5k dollars when I could build the same PC for around 750-1200 dollars. All depends on what you are trying to build.

    I hate that these companies are cashing in on the hoardes of morons that buy into the whole "gaming" market. I've seen so many things labeled for "gamers" that it makes me want to puke and I would like to see Maddox's take on this whole shitload of assraping that companies are doing to people who dont know anybetter.

  86. Monarch sucks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know about the rest of you, but I and a friend of mine have had serious issues with that company. We live approximately 30 minutes (traffic-free) from the store. With Atlanta traffic, it could easily take upwards of two hours. I have checked their website AND called them to see if an item was in stock. I have arrived to find out this was not the case multiple times. My friend has also had the same experience. He also tried returning a defective motherboard he purchased the same day, and they would not take it back or refund his money. I will NEVER give them any more of my money. I'd sooner take my chances ordering parts on the internet from a company in California, and that's just sad. If you go to resellerratings.com, you can find others with some pretty bad experiences.

  87. Pricey by PCCybertek · · Score: 1

    Seems like I could build one of these for a fraction of the cost. Has anyone priced this out piece by piece to see what they could build one themself for?

  88. NOPE YOU DON'T NEED TO... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you really need to shell out the big bucks for a card that does EAX4, or can you cut your expenditures significantly and go with a card that does something less than EAX4 (but still something really good)?
    You don't need to. But then again you don't need dual 7800s, or that A64FX. This machine is quote obviously all about excesses, so if EAX4 improves performance by even 1%, it's likely to get included in the spec.

  89. Fully loaded dual proc G5 is still $400 cheaper by melted · · Score: 1

    Fully loaded dual proc G5 with the latest NVidia/ATI video card and 2G of RAM (even overpriced RAM they sell) is still $400 cheaper than this thing. Go check at Apple store.

  90. umm by justaddwater · · Score: 0

    My other gaming obessions, World of Warcraft (Props to Ajul-Nerub server!) managed to turn in a more paltry 77.3 FPS, but given the fact that you are often depending on your connection with WoW for some of that, that's pretty amazing. Actually, I belive it's more of a CPU limit, rather then an bandwidth one.

  91. who cares about the tech support. by phos-phoros · · Score: 1

    but seriously, $5,000 and the pc is only covered for a period of 6 months?

  92. I swear... by javaxman · · Score: 1
    you can literally *see* the stench in here!

    "Here I am in the belly of the beast, and I don't even care. I don't even feel like taking a whiz on this. I used to dream of taking a whiz on this."

    The Venture Brothers is truly a great show. Right up there with Robot Chicken. No, better than that...

  93. Way overpriced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hard Data Ltd. will build the IDENTICAL system and deliver to your door for $4,200
    And they have been building Linux systems since 1993
    http://www.harddata.com/

    I had to laugh. The Monarch System defaults to Windows config on their page, and when I selected Fedora Core 4 it popped up some lame tech note claiming that FC4 would not support dual core CPUs.

    Never mind the fact that there ARE no duals listed as options on this configuration, they are simply wrong!

    Lame Alert!
    Lunux builder wanna-bes!

    Buy from a REAL Linux shop!

  94. compared to what? by geekoid · · Score: 1

    The article (coughadcough) says :
    "This machine rocks" but compared to what? how can you make a statment without comparing it to another 5000 gaming rig?

    the good news is that is comes with:
    "Floppy: Mitsumi Floppy 7-in-1 USB Card Reader/Smart Media Drive (Black)"

    sweet..and making it black will add at least 10% to the speed.

    Of course, if I wanted speed I would use a raid config with SCSI 360 and hard drives that have a 3.9 ms access time.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  95. When the say IEEE, they mean by geekoid · · Score: 1

    that's the noise people make when they see the price!

    Or when they see the ballhog...dribble dribble swish....

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  96. At 1600x1200 I can't see AA by HornWumpus · · Score: 1
    But my eyes are old and crusty.

    Still no reason to upgrade the 6800GT anytime soon.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  97. All of the standards? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1
    That's almost as impressive as having the institute on board.

    Must be a big MB.

    BTW The grandparent was a joke. So is this (just not a funny one).

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  98. Now add a second video card at $500+ by HornWumpus · · Score: 1
    Can you?

    Has the mac version of the 7800 shipped?

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'