Slashdot Mirror


The World's Smallest Car

starexplorer writes "Start your Nano-engines? LiveScience.com is reporting that researchers at Rice University have designed the world's smallest car that is no more than 4 nanometers across. It has a chassis, axles and a pivoting suspension. The wheels are buckyballs. Why do it? The team wants to build a fleet of nanotrucks to carry atoms and molecules around minature factories." So it's not exactly self-powered, but it rolls. It's a start!

220 comments

  1. Good idea, too small for me by the-amazing-blob · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sorry I'm late coming home, honey. I lost the car again.

    1. Re:Good idea, too small for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Lost the car? Imagine misplacing the keys...

    2. Re:Good idea, too small for me by drpimp · · Score: 3, Funny

      Unless of course it comes with nanospinners.. Then we're talkin'

      --
      -- Brought to you by Carl's JR
    3. Re:Good idea, too small for me by operagost · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm pretty sure I can fit 19" rims onto it. And a fart pipe.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    4. Re:Good idea, too small for me by bedroll · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you should wait until GM comes out with the Nano Hummer, the nano truck that's as spacious as a Geo Metro.

    5. Re:Good idea, too small for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They spinnin' nigga they spinninnn!

    6. Re:Good idea, too small for me by PsychicX · · Score: 1

      So, it seems to me only a matter of time before we create miniature factories, which can create miniature models of miniature factories.

    7. Re:Good idea, too small for me by tiker · · Score: 1

      I hope it doesn't rain on the way home tonight.

  2. Heh. by Meagermanx · · Score: 0

    From the too-much-time-on-their-hands dept.

    1. Re:Heh. by unr_stuart · · Score: 2, Funny

      Why do Texans insist upon finding every place possible to put an engine?

    2. Re:Heh. by Robocoastie · · Score: 2, Funny

      proves once again that people with high fallooten pieces of paper from universities will do anything to justify spending half their life and income in school.

  3. Only 4 nanometers across... by d3ac0n · · Score: 5, Funny

    And yet it still holds 10 clowns! Go figure.

    --
    Official Heretic from the "Church of Global Warming". Proven right thanks to whistle blowers. AGW = Flat Earth Theory
    1. Re:Only 4 nanometers across... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funniest thing I've read all day :)

    2. Re:Only 4 nanometers across... by femoric · · Score: 1

      Just wait till the Shriners get a hold of these things!

  4. Finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    is this a perfect solution for men that have really large reproductive organs?

    1. Re:Finally by andrewbillits · · Score: 0

      actually, i think this would be a solution for men who have nano size reproductive organs.

    2. Re:Finally by andrewbillits · · Score: 1

      damn, hit the wrong reply button...

    3. Re:Finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Course, that's to be expected when you're typing a comment with only one hand so the other can manipulate the ruler ;)

  5. Compact car by Crixus · · Score: 3, Funny

    So how does this redefine the phrase COMPACT CAR?

    --
    Ignore Alien Orders
    1. Re:Compact car by slashname3 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Oh great! Now half the parking lot will be marked off for nano-car parking. Had enough trouble parking the hummer in the compact car spots now I have to jocky it into half a billion nano-car spots. :)

    2. Re:Compact car by ozmanjusri · · Score: 4, Funny

      So how does this redefine the phrase COMPACT CAR?

      You mean it's not an instruction. Whoops.

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
  6. all good by OneArmedMan · · Score: 0, Redundant

    but how many clowns can you fit in one ?

  7. Rice U? by killercoder · · Score: 1

    Does the car scribble your name on a grain of rice too? My first impression was this had to be a joke. After careful thought I've come to the conclusion its a little ahead of its time. NanoTech is good for material sciences (right now), as it allows the design of materials from the atom up............I thought NanoTech as a manufacturing/computing medium was a LONG way away - if so - why an unpowered car?

    1. Re:Rice U? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does the car scribble your name on a grain of rice too?

      I would think the answer to that question would be obvious since this comes from Rice University...

    2. Re:Rice U? by bersl2 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Speaking of rice, where can you get Type-R stickers and spinning rims that small?

    3. Re:Rice U? by SteveAyre · · Score: 1

      Simple. NanoTech for serious uses is still a way off. It won't occur overnight.

      We'll get there by getting lots of little pieces of the puzzle. Eventually we'll have all the pieces and be able to use nano technology to do Cool Stuff(tm).

      This is just one piece of that puzzle.

    4. Re:Rice U? by Deltaspectre · · Score: 1, Funny

      Just stick a chromium atom on there for the rims

      No one will know the difference

      --
      My UID is prime... is yours?
    5. Re:Rice U? by slashname3 · · Score: 2, Funny

      why an unpowered car?

      Because that darn intern lost the pistons and camshaft for the motor. He's still looking for them.

    6. Re:Rice U? by plover · · Score: 3, Informative
      Nanotech has already hit the marketplace.

      I'm too lazy to google for it, but there's a company selling a nanomotor coated window glass for office buildings. You can buy it today.

      The idea is that the tiny motors rotate when powered by the sun. When the glass is dirty (spots from the rain, mineral deposits, bird "deposits", spider webs, etc.,) in a few hours the rotation will sweep the dirt from the glass. It's supposed to pay for itself by avoiding window-cleanings, especially on high-rise buildings.

      And I believe someone is using something similar to make a nanotech-based fog-free snowmobile visor. If you've ever ridden a snowmobile for more than a few hundred yards, you're probably familiar with the fogging problem. The first guy to market with this will have a solid lock on a big pile of money.

      And let's not forget our old buddy, DLP. While it's not technically "nanotech", it's still "microtech."

      What I think is neatest about the glass treatments is that they have nothing to do with computers or even technology! Some creative person just came up with a damn clever idea. There will undoubtedly be more.

      --
      John
    7. Re:Rice U? by lowrydr310 · · Score: 1
      Don't forget the !

      Screw the anti-fog snowmobile shield. When will someone use nanotechnology (or any technology) to cure baldness? That's where the money's at.

  8. Been there.... by CaptainCarrot · · Score: 2, Funny
    Talk about re-inventing the wheel!

    Sheesh!

    --
    And the brethren went away edified.
  9. shameless advertisemenet by LiquidMind · · Score: 1

    "well sir, the car you just purchased has no doors, no tires to speak of, no airbags, nothing you can call a seat, no radio, missing bumpers and a horrible AC package.

    ....but i got good news."

    --
    This sig contains repetition and redundancy.
    1. Re:shameless advertisemenet by chrpai · · Score: 1

      Ha ha. Good one.

    2. Re:shameless advertisemenet by Mantis8 · · Score: 0, Redundant

      "..but i got good news."

      You can save 15% on your car insurance by switching to Geico.

    3. Re:shameless advertisemenet by jamstar7 · · Score: 1
      "well sir, the car you just purchased has no doors, no tires to speak of, no airbags, nothing you can call a seat, no radio, missing bumpers and a horrible AC package. ....but i got good news."

      What, you saved a fortune by switching to Geico?

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
  10. I feel humbled by chrpai · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Can anyone else admit they feel humbled when they read things like this?

    1. Re:I feel humbled by forkazoo · · Score: 5, Funny

      Hell, no. I feel like a giant super man that can pick up a million cars with his bare hands, and knock over thousands of cars with a breath. How the hell is that humbling?

    2. Re:I feel humbled by Dr+Caleb · · Score: 5, Funny
      Try changing the tire, super man. ;)

      --
      "History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme." Mark Twain
    3. Re:I feel humbled by ToasterofDOOM · · Score: 1

      Actually no. It does, however, prove that Americans like me are overweight. How fat would you feel when you realize you weight millions of times more than your car?

      --
      I am Spartacus
    4. Re:I feel humbled by IWorkForMorons · · Score: 1

      Humbled? More like excited this stuff is actually coming true! Even more excited after reading the world's smallest refridgerator article. I bet I can get my aging XP2200+ up to a good 10Ghz with that thing. Extreme overclocking, here I come!

    5. Re:I feel humbled by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Coming soon... the worlds first nanosized "nizmo" "type-R" "Crane Cams" stickers.

    6. Re:I feel humbled by HungWeiLo · · Score: 1

      Well, if penile size is inversely proportionate to car horsepower / size, then, yes, I am very very humbled.

      --
      There are a huge number of yeast infections in this county. Probably because we're downriver from the bread factory.
    7. Re:I feel humbled by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I rarely laugh out loud on Slashdot, but that was TRULY hilarious!

    8. Re:I feel humbled by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That sounds like a job for ... Bicycle Repair Man!

    9. Re:I feel humbled by slashdot.org · · Score: 1

      Try changing the tire, super man. ;)

      Wow, can you imagine the trouble you'd be in getting a flat at 65nm/h?

    10. Re:I feel humbled by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, I feel annoyed. This isn't a car. It's a cart. Why do people think exaggeration and lies are good? This thing is cool, but it's coolest without covering it in bullshit.

  11. Yes, it's small by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But can it run on peanut oil?

  12. A great day... by Aenema · · Score: 5, Funny

    for the small people that helped make such a thing possible

  13. It's perfect! by saskboy · · Score: 0, Troll

    ...Perfect for producing nano-toxins that is.

    --
    Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    1. Re:It's perfect! by Muttley · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What is a nano-toxin? How does it differ from a toxin? In what way does the creation of a small macromolecule in the shape of a car contribute to toxicity?

      This is phobia and panic, started in the realm of GE food, and spreading, through ignorance, into the world of nanotech. Nanotech is ill defined, and literally means anything over the nano-scale. Scaremongers try to use new scary words (hence their profession), like nano-toxin, and site that nanoparticles are in things like sunscreen, aerosols...etc. Of course they are, for without TiO4 in sunscreen, it wouldn't block ultraviolet rays, and it wouldn't work. I fail to see the difference between a nano-toxin and a toxin, but regardless of what I fail to see, this kind of irrational skepticism and 'but it could be NANO-toxic!' are unhelpful, and only serve to further the divide between scientists and society. Likewise, scientists dismissing the concerns of the public also furthers this divide.

      Inform yourself, ask questions of the scientists, but don't say sarcastic unhelpful things like 'it's perfect for producing nano-toxins', without explaining how this might occur.

      --
      M.
    2. Re:It's perfect! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just wait till you have a few thousand nanocars driving around your lungs. Then we can talk about nanotoxicity.

    3. Re:It's perfect! by klack · · Score: 1

      He's talking about the nano-exhaust producing nano-carbon monoxide.

    4. Re:It's perfect! by saskboy · · Score: 1

      "What is a nano-toxin? How does it differ from a toxin? In what way does the creation of a small macromolecule in the shape of a car contribute to toxicity?"

      HAHAHAHA, you didn't get my joke? Well, I wasn't clear I was joking, and there are loons out there so I forgive you.

      The two others who replied to you got the joke. I was also thinking of posting a link to the nano-fibers /. article from yesterday, but didn't because my back kinda hurts and I didn't want to do more clicking.

      --
      Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
  14. Smallest car comes from RICE university? by DigitalReverend · · Score: 1

    What's next nano-deabolt locks from Yale?

    --
    I read Slashdot for the headlines, because the headlines, unlike the articles, are usually original and never duplicated
    1. Re:Smallest car comes from RICE university? by Feyr · · Score: 1

      and then get the MIT team to try to break in?

    2. Re:Smallest car comes from RICE university? by slashname3 · · Score: 1

      What's next nano-deabolt locks from Yale?

      Nah, little tiny bumper stickers that say "save the whales!".

    3. Re:Smallest car comes from RICE university? by biryokumaru · · Score: 1

      +1 obscure reference! =]

      --
      When you're afraid to download music illegally in your own home, then the terrorists have won!
    4. Re:Smallest car comes from RICE university? by kurzweilfreak · · Score: 2, Funny

      And little tiny Jesus fish. Followed by the little tiny Darwin fish.... which will actually be real bacteria that will consume the entire car.

      --

      kurzweil_freak

      5th Kyu Genbukan Ninpo/KJJR student

      Be the darkness that allows the light to shine.

  15. yeah, but the hard part is... by bobalu · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...making a really small Midas muffler shop.

    --
    The revolution will NOT be televised.
  16. lazy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    you're telling me that they're too lazy to carry something that freakin small?

    1. Re:lazy by kd5ujz · · Score: 1

      This was a last resort, after the microbes formed a union.

      --
      -William
      God is everything science has yet to explain.
  17. One question by Auckerman · · Score: 4, Funny

    How many microns/nanogram does it get?

    --

    Burn Hollywood Burn
    1. Re:One question by b0lt · · Score: 1

      It doesn't.
      The car is unpowered, and just rolls around.

      --
      got sig?
    2. Re:One question by aminorex · · Score: 2, Interesting

      But one can easily imagine pushing such vehicles about using laser beams. A single laser can
      push millions of little cars around, using spinning mirrors and judicious timing.

      --
      -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
    3. Re:One question by mbstone · · Score: 3, Funny

      It depends. YMMV.

    4. Re:One question by Spit · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Look out, I think it just ran over your sense of humour particle.

      --
      POKE 36879,8
    5. Re:One question by mindriot · · Score: 2, Funny

      No no no.

      It's YÅMV, of course. Your Ångströmage may vary.

  18. I give it six months by BandwidthHog · · Score: 4, Funny

    Till they add an SUV to the lineup.

    --

    Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?
    1. Re:I give it six months by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When they do, I'll give it only six days until we start complaining about their wasteful, road-hogging nano-SUVs that guzzle up to 100 picoliters of gasoline per fill-up.

    2. Re:I give it six months by slashdot.org · · Score: 1

      Till they add an SUV to the lineup.

      Yeah, with 20" dubs!

  19. Directional Friction Reduction? by jellomizer · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Could this be used to make materials that have significantly less friction going in one direction and more going the other. The possibilities are endless. Like Bar tables that when drinks are shifted across it can move around corners. and stop right at the customer. Cool

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    1. Re:Directional Friction Reduction? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoa that's a cool idea, imagine seeing that for your first time after you've already had a case of nanobrewery beer

    2. Re:Directional Friction Reduction? by Compuser · · Score: 4, Interesting

      As someone who has done plenty of STM an nano work in his life,
      I can tell you two things:
      1. I do not believe they have proven the wheels roll. They think they
      have proven it but their STM work is embarassingly bad
      (for starters, clean Au-111 surface has herringbone reconstruction
      which is not seen in their images, the car is not resolved with anything
      close to atomic resolution, temperature drift is atrocious etc.)
      2. The surface of gold is very "soft" even at room temperature. Heating
      it to 100 C often is enough to restore herringbone reconstruction to
      a mechanically randomized surface. By 200 C the surface is essentially
      a liquid though gold's partial pressure is still negligible meaning
      that this liquid does not yet evaporate. Everything I see in their
      paper shows to me that the molecules do not roll, but rather diffuse
      or surf along with the surface. Certainly many buckyballs are seen
      near step edges, something that happens to all crap diffusing on the
      surface because it is energetically favorable to assemble there.

      In short, there is no evidence of science or even engineering here.
      Slashdot bought into the PR of the kind of nano project that made
      nanotechnology into a dirty word among the leading research groups
      in the area. BTW, I am not doing STM research and am not planning
      to so I am not speaking as a competitor. More like: this is why I
      moved on from nano-work, so i don't have to deal with crap-meisters
      like this.

    3. Re:Directional Friction Reduction? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      You may well have done lots of nano work but you still dont realise that you don't have to press return at the end of each line!

      Doh!

    4. Re:Directional Friction Reduction? by nasor · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I also do "nano" work, and I wondered about this too. The problem with laying single molecules down on gold surfaces is that they tend to diffuse around the surface (or even sink into it) over time even at room temperature, and it happens much faster if the gold is heated. How do they know it's rolling?

    5. Re:Directional Friction Reduction? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In short, there is no evidence of science or even engineering here.

      I guess they figure it worked for evolution why not nanotechnology...

    6. Re:Directional Friction Reduction? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From the article, it looks like the evidence that the car was rolling and not sliding is that it moved in a direction perpendicular to its axles. If it were diffusing, wouldn't it move equally well in any direction?

  20. Teleportation by tavilach · · Score: 1

    Imagine all of your molecules being transported from place to place in a little nanocar caravan. Now that would be a sight, indeed!

    --

    "Give me a lever long enough and a fulcrum on which to place it, and I shall move the world." -Archimedes
    1. Re:Teleportation by Max_Wells_SH · · Score: 0

      Imagine all of your molecules being transported from place to place in a little nanocar caravan. Now that would be a sight, indeed!

      Teleportation? Transportation? I could avoid the complexity of putting my disassembled molecules into a caravan of little nanocars and just continue putting all my molecules in a macrocar--er, regular car... Nissan Micra?

      --
      I read Slashdot for the articles.
  21. Uh huh by connah0047 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I can see the science team going to the board of directors:

    BoD: What's the problem?
    Scientists: Well, we need to be able to move atoms and molecules around in precise ways.
    BoD: How can we help?
    Scientists: We need some funding to build little, tiny trucks to carry them around in.
    [long pause]
    BoD: HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!! No really guys, what did you need?

  22. Time to re-define the term... by CptNerd · · Score: 1

    Time to redefine the term "short-haul trucking."

    Will the nanotrucks need nano-union nano-drivers?

    What about the nano-truckstops? Staffed with nano-waitresses?

    etc. etc. etc. :-)

    --
    By the taping of my glasses, something geeky this way passes
    1. Re:Time to re-define the term... by scottv67 · · Score: 1

      What about the nano-truckstops? Staffed with nano-waitresses?

      etc. etc. etc. :-)


      You forgot the nano-Lot Lizards for the nano-truckstop. :^)

  23. maybe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    they're under-compensating for their huge penises?

  24. load? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How much stuff (mass-wise) can it carry?

  25. All kidding aside by Belseth · · Score: 1

    Doesn't seem very practical. There has to be a better way of moving atoms at that scale than wheeled robots? Physics are very different at that scale.

    1. Re:All kidding aside by yumyum · · Score: 1
      My thought as well. And the article has this:

      "It's fairly easy to build nanoscale objects that slide around on a surface," said Tour's colleague Kevin Kelly. "Proving that we were rolling - not slipping and sliding - was one of the most difficult parts of this project." So just how do you make a nanocar go? At room temperature, strong electrical bonds hold the buckyball wheels tightly against the gold, but heating to about 200 degrees Celsius frees them to roll.
      So why go the "wheel" route if there is a better way to move stuff around?
    2. Re:All kidding aside by SteveAyre · · Score: 1

      Taking from nature's example in most animals I imagine the best way would be to pump a fluid around containing the required materials. (i.e. like blood)

  26. Sensationalist journalism by fireboy1919 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You know, there's a word for a vehicle that doesn't have an engine, or a bed, and is smaller than a car.

    It's called a wagon.

    Doesn't sound as cool, does it? But that's what it is, isn't it?

    Rechargable nanomotors that don't break - that's what we need for this kind of thing. Its the holy grail for nanotech right now.

    If you don't avoid all references to objects that move under their own power (and you're talking about nanotech), then you're sensationalizing the news. Its like saying "Fusion done in cold!" when you mean that someone built a fusion laser system in Anarctica. Obviously cold means something specific when its that close to the word "Fusion."

    Keep up the sensationalism, and you can't get the point across when you come across something that's actually fantastic.

    --
    Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
    1. Re:Sensationalist journalism by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

      I was going to say that it's actually a trailer, but with no hitch, it's nothing more than a cart or wagon. Sigh. I'm gonna start asking people where the company car is when I need to move heavier equipment around the building...

    2. Re:Sensationalist journalism by dirtsurfer · · Score: 3, Funny

      See, this is the problem with nanotechnology. No matter what great advances you make, there are always so many people who just want to split hairs.

      *ba-dum-dum-pshh*

    3. Re:Sensationalist journalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't quit your day job.

    4. Re:Sensationalist journalism by Leibel · · Score: 2, Informative

      from dictionary.com 5. Archaic. A chariot, carriage, or cart. I think this qualifies, although maybe on a technicality. Surely if you put the worlds smallest motor on it, you'd have the worlds smallest motor car. I think that it's not as sensasionalist as you make out.

    5. Re:Sensationalist journalism by dirtsurfer · · Score: 0

      But.. this IS my day job! :(

    6. Re:Sensationalist journalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It's not so much "sensationalist journalism" as "people describing something new in terms they're most familiar with".

      When cars were new, people called them "horseless carriages". Sensationalist journalism? No, simply using terms people are most familiar with. So when we build a horseless carriage (sorry, "cart"?) 4 nanometers across, what do we call it? Well, it has 4 wheels, and what do we know that has 4 wheels...

      I suspect a lot of nano-things aren't going to technically fit the definition of, well, anything -- they're very different from other kinds of things people build -- but using terms most familiar to people makes sense to me.

    7. Re:Sensationalist journalism by Spit · · Score: 1

      It's never too late to not be a dickhead.

      --
      POKE 36879,8
    8. Re:Sensationalist journalism by some+guy+I+know · · Score: 2, Insightful
      You know, there's a word for a vehicle that doesn't have an engine, or a bed, and is smaller than a car.

      It's called a wagon.
      Actually, the terms are rather blurred.
      For example, railroad dining cars are not self-powered, station wagons have an engine, and covered wagons had beds (or, at least, bedding).

      One of the definitions of "car", from dictionary.com, is "4-wheeled motor vehicle; usually propelled by an internal combustion engine".
      Note the word "usually".
      By stretching this definition, the "motor" could be the STM probe or the heated gold atoms or whatever actually make the vehicle move.
      (The article isn't clear about that.)
      Note that there is no requirement in the definition that the motor be mounted on the device itself.
      So, the device has four wheels, and is powered by a motor.
      That makes it a car.

      I know that this is splitting hairs, but a split hair is a pretty big thing at nanoscales.
      --
      Those who sacrifice security to condemn liberty deserve to repeat history or something. - Benjamin Santayana
    9. Re:Sensationalist journalism by mrselfdestrukt · · Score: 0

      A good joke. A drum role. And it still gets a score:0
      It must be friday on /.

      --
      "I used to have that really cool,funny sig ,but it got stolen."
    10. Re:Sensationalist journalism by SomeoneGotMyNick · · Score: 1

      POKE 36879,8

      Hey, another VIC-20 fan!!!

    11. Re:Sensationalist journalism by Ced_Ex · · Score: 1

      It's called a wagon.

      Looks more like a skateboard to me.

      --
      Live forever, or die trying.
  27. But, by hinata · · Score: 1

    I'm sure my wife will fail to parallel park again.

  28. They'll be in for some fun... by NarrMaster · · Score: 1

    ...when it's revealed they use non-union drivers at the factory.

    --
    That's right. All your base.
  29. Well.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So now we have the world's smallest car, which could be driven by the world's smallest robot. What happens if we put the world's smallest motor in the car? Maybe he could use it to transport the world's smallest refrigerator, and write about his adventures with the world's smallest fountain pen.
    It's a small world after all.

  30. How long before... by Psx29 · · Score: 1, Redundant

    We start seeing nano size SUVs?

    1. Re:How long before... by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      Here ya go, the Daihatsu Terios Lucia, available with a monstrous 660ccm motor.

      The rest of the site (http://finnesey.org/) has lots of other pics of cute little japanese cars (and a few rather cool Kei-car sports cars), too.

      It seems that almost every single car available in Japan has either an AWD option, a turbo option or both...

      --
      Eat the rich.
  31. Put it in "H!" by sigmaseven · · Score: 1

    And you're still going to have trouble finding a place to park.

    Worse, the authorities could probably use an ion as a "boot."

  32. This is nothing more than..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a modern day flea circus!

  33. Mileage by ChrisGoodwin · · Score: 1

    I wonder what kind of mileage it gets.

    Uhhh... inchage? Millimeterage?

    --
    Pretend there is some witty statement here.
  34. Being picky but...... by Allnighterking · · Score: 1

    In order to be a car, which is/was originally slang for Automobile it needs to be self propelled. What they have created is the worlds first cart. More exact, the rolling stock for the worlds first cart.

    Still cool as shyte anyway you slice it.

    --

    I'm sorry, I'm to tired to be witty at the moment so this message will have to do.

    1. Re:Being picky but...... by Allnighterking · · Score: 1

      Dang one must read first.. change that to "worlds first nano cart."

      --

      I'm sorry, I'm to tired to be witty at the moment so this message will have to do.

  35. Don't forget by quickbasicguru · · Score: 1

    Don't forget the worlds smallest violin...

  36. I can see it now by Omnieiunium · · Score: 3, Funny

    Pimp my nano car.

    1. Re:I can see it now by Headcase88 · · Score: 1

      "Yo dogs, we have to get rid of these old rusty 300 picometer rims. It's time to ditch that shiz for some of these madd new 420 picometer chrome rims!"

      --
      "When the atomic bomb goes off there's devastation...but when the atomic bong goes off there's celebraaaaation!"
  37. Pic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Here's a pic:

              .

    I hope they don't make the same mistake Ford made, and only offer it in black.

    -AC

    1. Re:Pic by Soul-Burn666 · · Score: 2, Funny

      They already offer it in white aswell.
      Here's a pic, with the car circled:

                  o

      --
      ^_^
    2. Re:Pic by Kent+Simon · · Score: 1

      :( i can't see it... (just kidding)

      --
      Kent Simon Multitheft Auto
    3. Re:Pic by ArAgost · · Score: 1

      Absolutely not! The nano car will be available both in black & white.

  38. Hmm, at least it's... by MikeSty · · Score: 0

    ... better than Clint Jones' beater Saab.

  39. And the gas mileage is still lousy... by Cerdic · · Score: 1

    The damn thing only gets 10 nanomiles per nanogallon!

    --
    Advice for my fellow geeks: before seeking out that threesome you dream of, you might see what a TWOsome is like first.
    1. Re:And the gas mileage is still lousy... by Omnieiunium · · Score: 1

      You have to upgrade to the new hybrid model, I get about 20 nanomiles and I save about $0.00001 year!

  40. how by machine+of+god · · Score: 0

    How? HOW? Anyone?

    1. Re:how by machine+of+god · · Score: 1

      And how did they stop it from sliding if sliding is so easy and rolling is so hard?

  41. Great, a new oxymoron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nano-SUV.

  42. Better Link by sapgau · · Score: 5, Informative

    With less cookies and better pictures at Nanotechnology Now

    1. Re:Better Link by ToadMan8 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Just for the sake of correctness, you should say "With fewer cookies..."

      Less is a measure of amount (e.g. "Put less milk in if it bothers your stomach."), whereas "fewer" describes a measure of something you can count (like cookies, cars, etc.).

      --
      I haven't posted in so long, my sig is out of date.
    2. Re:Better Link by joemawlma · · Score: 0

      mmmmmm cookies...

    3. Re:Better Link by antispam_ben · · Score: 1

      Less is a measure of amount (e.g. "Put less milk in if it bothers your stomach."), whereas "fewer" describes a measure of something you can count (like cookies, cars, etc.).

      Life is getting better for pedants, many supermarket express lanes now say "12 items or fewer."

      But (OOTC) aren't you putting in FEWER molecules of milk?

      --
      Tag lost or not installed.
    4. Re:Better Link by ModernGeek · · Score: 1

      I don't see any better pictures

      --
      Sig: I stole this sig.
    5. Re:Better Link by EvanED · · Score: 1

      Life is getting better for pedants, many supermarket express lanes now say "12 items or fewer."

      I noticed that in Wegman's fairly recently. It pleased me, because I tend to be somewhat of a stickler for grammar.

      It also reminds me of a scene from Apollo 13 where Mattingly is watching I think the Dick Cavett show, and Cavett says something about "3 million fewer viewers... what do you say, '3 million fewer viewers or less viewers'... 3 million fewer viewers watched this space launch than the last one."

      But (OOTC) aren't you putting in FEWER molecules of milk?

      Yeah, but still less milk. I guess it's sort of like how you would say, "12 pencils weigh 50 grams [or whatever; I have no clue]" but "a group of 12 pencils weighs 50 grams."

  43. Does it fly? by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

    I don't care how small it is, the all important question is whether it flies or not.

    The world must know.

    --
    liqbase :: faster than paper
  44. Damn. by MaXiMiUS · · Score: 0

    They sure have those clowns beat!

    --
    It's never just a game when you're winning. - George Carlin
  45. Rice? by alphapartic1e · · Score: 1

    Where's the VTEC and Type-R stickers?

    1. Re:Rice? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Look at my 24 nanometer rims, yo.

      "I live my life one micrometer at a time" - Vin Diesel
  46. The biggest problem by Harker · · Score: 2, Funny

    The ground clearance sucks.

    H

    --
    When VCR's are outlawed, only outlaws will have VCR's.
  47. Crashing by No2Gates · · Score: 1

    And if you're worried about a fender-bender in your nano-car, Earl Scheib has signed on for painting them with "no ups and no extras..."

    --
    Every time you call tech support, a little kitten dies.
  48. nano-car parking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As soon as they make parking spots for this tiny car, I'm sure there will be a line of SUV's waiting to take them.

  49. What about the keys? by Torteth · · Score: 1

    Imagine how easy it would be to lose the keys for one of these...

  50. Obligatory by Council · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The obligatory joke to make here would be that if they think they've made this truck small, wait 'til they see what happens when the Japanese get their hands on it.

    Or maybe, because the researchers are in Texas, I could suggest that they are now embarking on a program to make the biggest nano-car in the 50 states. Or that maybe they didn't insist on sticking a pickup bed on the back. Or "wow, have we discovered the only Texans who are secure about their penis size?"

    But I'm not going to make any of those jokes. I'm not even going to make any potentially +1 insightful comments about how the real-world applications of this in terms of actual trucks in little tiny factories are clearly pretty silly from where I'm sitting, because things work totally differently on the nano scale, and that's just clearly grasping at some sort of relevance (though obviously, the construction methods are important).

    Know why I'm not going to make any of those comments? Because I just don't care anymore. I try so hard to be interested sometimes, studying toward a Ph. D in physics and engaging in interesting slashdot debate day after day, and sometimes I sit here and realize that I don't really care about any of it. I want to go outside. I hate this damn computer, this damn internet, all you moderators, and myself for posting here seeking approval for these stupid, inane remarks and pseudointellectual commentary I barf up, seeing it moderated to +5 by people who don't know any better. Deliver me from this, merciful God. My soul is devoid of humor, and my life is an empty, broken shell.

    Anyone want to go out for a drink?

    --
    xkcd.com - a webcomic of mathematics, love, and language.
    1. Re:Obligatory by interstellar_donkey · · Score: 1

      One thing to consider: It techinically *is* intended to be a truck, but just like regular sized trucks in Texas it's really just there for folks to look at (hey, check out my truck!) They have no intention of actually using it to haul something around.

      --
      The Internet is generally stupid
    2. Re:Obligatory by Council · · Score: 1

      The news story mentions that "[e]ventually the researchers want to build tiny trucks that could carry atoms and molecules around in miniature factories."

      Which sounds awfully sketchy to me.

      --
      xkcd.com - a webcomic of mathematics, love, and language.
    3. Re:Obligatory by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      "Anyone want to go out for a drink?"

      Looks like you've already beat us to it...

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    4. Re:Obligatory by tjcoyle · · Score: 1

      Where?

    5. Re:Obligatory by Council · · Score: 1

      I dunno, know any good places?

      --
      xkcd.com - a webcomic of mathematics, love, and language.
    6. Re:Obligatory by Tekgno · · Score: 1

      I'd love to go out for a drink, but my money says you are not a fellow Aussie and thus it would be an extremely expensive drinking session for at least one of us.

  51. This is a joke by dylanm · · Score: 1

    This was a spoof from venture capital firm Draper Fisher Jurvetson for the Sand Hill Challenge (VC Soap Box derby in Silicon Valley about 5 years ago). Its been picked up before as a serious story, here is Jurvetson unveiling the nanocar:

    http://www3.flickr.com/photos/jurvetson/452668/in/ set-44201/

  52. Top Speed by icecow · · Score: 1

    I hear tops speeds of over 240 miles per lightyear!

    --
    Stop invalid scientific research. Ask your local scientists to feed their lab rats with a phytoestrogen-free chow.
    1. Re:Top Speed by quanticle · · Score: 1

      Huh?

      A lightyear is a measure of distance, like miles. You saying it can achieve 240 miles per lightyear would be like me saying it can go 25 miles per meter.

      Do you mean 240 miles per year? Given the scale that this thing operates on, that would still be pretty quick. Maybe 24 inches in a year, but 240 miles? That's a bit much.

      Yes, I know its a joke, but it doesn't make any sense the way you've written it.

      --
      We all know what to do, but we don't know how to get re-elected once we have done it
  53. world's smallest cart. by Stephen+Samuel · · Score: 1

    I was going to call it the world's smallest cart. Close enough to 'car' to get people's attention, and more accurate. And it, in no way, demeans the accomplishment.

    --
    Free Software: Like love, it grows best when given away.
  54. Mixed Feelings About This by Zobeid · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I've been watching for developments in nanotech ever since Engines of Creation was published back in 1985. It was a highly influential book for me, and I'm sure for many others. Progress has been a lot slower than some of us expected or hoped. This "car" brings forth two different feelings. . .

    First, a dejected sigh. It's not useful for anything, and it's a long, awfully long way from the sophisticated "assemblers" that Drexler foresaw 20 years ago, with their thousands (or millions?) of molecular components.

    On the other hand. . . These guys have actually built a mechanism with multiple moving parts at the molecular level. This is the first thing I've seen that looks anything like "real" molecular nanotechnology, as opposed to mere nanoscale particles.

    So, is the glass half empty or half full? There's a temptation to laugh at this pathetic little "car" today -- but future generations might look back and say this is where the nanotechnology revolution first germinated. :)

  55. Buckballs? by jager2222 · · Score: 1

    So they finally figured out what to use buckyballs for... We're living the dream folks.

  56. EPA Estimates by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 2, Funny

    Sadly, it was designed by GM, and so only gets 12 miles per gallon.

  57. Re:Compact car - depends by weighn · · Score: 1
    So how does this redefine the phrase COMPACT CAR?

    That would depend on whether its short-wheel-base or unbelievably-short-wheel base.

    --
    Mongrel News all the news that fits and froths
  58. Labor Issues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So will these nano-factories have little nano-underpaid-immigrant workers too?

  59. short-sightedness by UESMark · · Score: 4, Funny

    It is so typical that when developing the industrial nano-cities of the future they chose to develop nano-cars instead of a sensible atomic mass transit system. If this policy continues the consumption of nano-gas will raise nano-oil prices so high that soon we will have to invade nano-arabia. I for one will continue to endorse nano-carpooling and the use of nano-bikes whenever possible,

  60. Honey, I Shrunk the Car by sharkey · · Score: 1

    This is the new Rick Moranis movie, right?

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  61. Took long enough by nEoN+nOoDlE · · Score: 1

    Finally an elegant solution to rising gas prices. Now it will once again only cost me 20 bucks to fill up the tank.

    --
    Don't trust a bull's horn, a doberman's tooth, a runaway horse or me.
  62. Troll? -- Re:Finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did someone not get the joke?
    Why isn't this comment +5 funny already? (When I read it I laughed aloud)

    Hint: Some people "compensate" by buying big-ass SUVs...

    1. Re:Troll? -- Re:Finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, the Troll moderation was from someone with a really large SUV.

  63. Is this where tax money goes? by pollux_polex · · Score: 0, Troll

    What a relief it is to find that scientists are working so hard on making a teeny tiny car; I thought they might be spending their time trying to find a cure for cancer or some debilitating disease. *shudder*

  64. Crookes Radiometer by kd5ujz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I wonder if you could attach a dark material, and a light material, and have the car move ala the vanes in a radiometer. with a car this small, light should be able to move it. Of course you would need a slight vacuum. Another problem, would be that people still do not have facts as to how the radiometer works, just theorys.

    --
    -William
    God is everything science has yet to explain.
    1. Re:Crookes Radiometer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is not light that propels if you watch a radiometer, the black side is propelling and the white/silver side is rushing forward, so it must be heat in the [imperfect] vacuum that is propelling. Many believe it to be light, but as black absorbs light, the heat is probably what is propelling it, although in a perfect vacuum, the direction would probably reverse. Not sure if they carried this experiment out in space yet.

    2. Re:Crookes Radiometer by mbstone · · Score: 1

      So it would need a vacuum gauge?

    3. Re:Crookes Radiometer by jobcello · · Score: 1

      I wonder if a sail (ala radiometer vanes) that size would really move a car that size. A smaller sail would receive less energy, so in spite of your car being smaller, your sail is also smaller. Why not just attach a large solar sail to a regular sized car and see what happens? Only the proportion changes.

  65. If They Built It In Detroit; by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the Nano gets built in Detroit you can bet it won't get better that 20mpg, no matter how small the engine is.

  66. Impressive, but slightly misleading by musakko · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Granted, this is very impressive science. But to say it's a 'car' reminds me of those ads for sea monkeys from comics years ago: The ones which showed them as basically being a little underwater nuclear family. Still bought some though! http://seamonkeys.3wpages.com/ComicSeamonkeyAd1.jp g

  67. Gas by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1, Troll
    *sigh* And gas will STILL be too expensive...

    --
    Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  68. Package by ozTravman · · Score: 2, Funny

    Okay so guys with small penises buy big cars.... Finally they have made a car suitable for me!

  69. Pimp my nano-ride by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can I get it with some radioactive atoms, give it that nice green glow..

  70. oblig. simpsons quote by wylf · · Score: 1

    Wadlow: [lifts Nelson out of the sewer by his head]
    Do you find something comical about my appearance when I'm driving my automobile?
    Nelson: Yeah.
    Wadlow: Everyone needs to drive a vehicle, even the very tall.
    [turns Nelson to face the car]
    This was the largest auto that I could afford. Am I therefore to be made the subject of fun?
    Nelson: I guess so.

  71. But... by Junta · · Score: 1

    Can it make the Kessel run in less than 12 parsecs?

    --
    XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  72. I have seen the devices of which you speak... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are called "rails"

  73. Not the new Bluesmobile until by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they fix the cigarette lighter.

  74. Deathtrap by Nerdposeur · · Score: 1

    Sure, it's compact, but ten to one the crash rating sucks.

  75. Next up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Researchers assemble fewer than a dozen chromium atoms into the world's smallest spinnaz.

  76. Broken promise... by olrik666 · · Score: 1

    It still does not fly...

  77. Only alittle more time...? by Now.Imperfect · · Score: 1

    Wonder how long until we have nanocities.

  78. Dude, where's my car?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dude, where's my car?!

  79. I think this is much more interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One of the links after the article:

    The smallest fridge
    http://www.livescience.com/imageoftheday/siod_0504 27.html

  80. Finally: Honest Nanotechnology by Baldrson · · Score: 1
    What with all the hype about anything that we used to call "chemistry" or perhaps more precisely "surface chemistry" being portrayed as "nanotechnology", its refreshing to see something that actually fills the bill being demonstrated.

    And it demonstrates the problems predicted by skeptics: The system had to be heated to the point that the carbon would debond from the gold so it could roll. I suspect it was a very bumpy roll. This sort of problem isn't likely to go away easily.

  81. Eight thimble-sized cylinders by mortong · · Score: 3, Funny

    Bah, that's nothing. Wake me up when they make a little blue dune buggy.

    1. Re:Eight thimble-sized cylinders by dascandy · · Score: 1

      That would be a DNA buggy at that scale. Enjoy it and please don't cross the continuous carbon chains.

  82. Inaccurate headline by srussia · · Score: 1

    "So it's not exactly self-powered, but it rolls." So headline should read "World's Smallest Soap-Box Racer"

    --
    Set your phasers on "funky"!
  83. Can't sit in a nanontech car by SpaghettiPattern · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You can't sit in a nanontech car. This smallest car ever is still the Fiat 500. Here's an image. And yes, (theoretically) 4 people can sit in it.

    --

    I hadn't the slightest objection to his spending his time planning massacres for the bourgeoisie... (P.G. Wodehouse)
  84. Rolls?!? by dwater · · Score: 1

    I hope they got permission; as was necessary for FAB1, which was (previously) the smallest rolls.

    --
    Max.
  85. car stereo by rishistar · · Score: 1

    Does it come with a music system thats iPod nano ready?

    --
    Professor Karmadillo Songs of Science
  86. Colour? by Skiron · · Score: 1

    "You can have any colour you want, as long as it is electron microscope image greenish type colour"

  87. Obligatory Simpsons quote by wick3t · · Score: 1

    Now to the plant!
    <Mr Burns> We'll take the Spruce Moose
    *Mr Burns picks up model plane
    <Mr Burns> Hop in!
    <Smithers> ...but sir
    *Mr Burns cocks gun and points it at Smithers
    <Mr Burns> I said hop in

  88. "Heh" is right. This is just hype... by msauve · · Score: 1

    A "car," to most people, is something which is self propelled. Maybe this is the world's smallest skateboard?

    --
    "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
  89. ummm... a rendered image? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This supposed 'breakthrough' and all they can offer up is a phony rendered image? I have serious doubts this even happened. Any nanomachining-capable place would be able to image what they made. Hey, are those WMD's in the background???

  90. Doctor Fun by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  91. eh.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Trouble? 65 nm/h should be like standstill for a car that measures 4 nm across..

  92. That grey goo... by syn3rg · · Score: 1

    ...it's bondo.

    --
    The contents of this message have been doubly encrypted by ROT13
  93. The important question nowadays is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... how many MPG do you get with it ?

  94. It's not the size of the car... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's how you use it.

  95. What would Apple say? by echomancer · · Score: 1

    If one of the numerous automakers pick this line up, do you think Apple might make a stink since it's based on NANO technology? I can see the lawsuits now...

    --
    And I lift my glass to the awful truth which you can't reveal to the ears of youth except to say it isn't worth a dime.
  96. String theory by Saggi · · Score: 1

    Now we can use the strings from string theory to make a rubberband engine for the car!

    --
    -:) Oh no - not again.
    www.rednebula.com
  97. Future.... by himanshuarora · · Score: 1

    Now we started off with nanocars. In future we'll have nano weapons of mass destruction(NWMD). Nano race, nano computers, nano world wars etc. Good luck for your future.

    --
    Spam: Any activity on internet to gain popularity without paying to advertising companies like Google.
  98. nano??? by waamaral · · Score: 1

    Oh, come on! we have vi[m], why use nano?

    --
    What, do I need a sig now?
  99. I have to admit... by Gruneun · · Score: 1

    I did not see this technology coming.

  100. Start your Nano-engines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But... it has no engines. "So it's not exactly self-powered, but it rolls."

    So, they're not really the world's smallest cars, are they? I'd say they're the world's smallest buggies. Now all we need is some nanohorses!

  101. Jackass by chrisnewbie · · Score: 0

    The guy from jackass the movie would of like to stick this up his ass instead of the normal size matchbox car he used.

  102. If your nanocar is broken . . . by xyrw · · Score: 1

    I guess you have to send it to a quantum mechanic.

  103. Not too small for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can you imagine the power to weight ratio of this baby if you dropped a big block chevy into it?

    That car would scream!

  104. Micromachines! Anyone remember those? by xanthines-R-yummy · · Score: 1
    Anyone remember those little toy cars called MicroMachines? They had commercials with the guy who could talk really fast. Maybe these NanoMachines(TM) [Mine, mine!, all mine!], will have an even faster talking guy.

    PS It doesn't look like the second site will weather a slashdotting. Just lettin ya know!

  105. Moving stuff around factories, sure.. by TheLoneGundam · · Score: 1

    But how are they going to miniaturize the shop steward who says only union buckyball-drivers can drive that barrel of protons from point A to point B, and that a different driver has to move it from point B to point C?

  106. Hate to bring any *facts* into this, but... by Ancient_Hacker · · Score: 1

    The reason it doesnt have a motor is your basic physics. Make a motor 10 times smaller, and its power output goes down by a factor of 1,000, but the friction only down by a factor of 100. Ten times more friction than before, proportionally. Do this just a few times and you have a motor that can't even turn itself over. Kinda reminds me of a Chevette diesel. This imbroglio happens many many powers of ten up the scale from this nano-idiocy. It may look cool but its very unlikely to ever be mobile.

  107. Micro machines by Chas · · Score: 1

    John Moschita's gonna have to talk REALLY fast to sell these!

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
  108. MTV...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just wait until 'pimp my ride' gets hold of it...

  109. Cart, not car by ediron2 · · Score: 1

    Not to diss the creators and their accomplishment, but a pair of axles on a chassis hardly fits anyone's definition of a car. A cart, maybe.

  110. Wow! by gstoddart · · Score: 1

    Suddenly today's Dr. Fun Cartoon makes sense now. :-P

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  111. How do they know it's rolling? by GungaDan · · Score: 1

    It grits its teeth, sweats a lot, and gyrates suggestively to techno music.

    --
    Eloi are stupid, throw morlocks at them!
  112. Followed up on this with a news story by robyn217 · · Score: 1
    Hey guys,

    I was fascinated by the idea (/. inspired), so i followed up on it by interviewing the head researcher. he gave me links to video of the Nanocar driving around, too. And filled me in on a new internal nanoscale motor. I wrote up my findings in this pcmag news story.

    -robyn

  113. Re:Does it fly? - But that's not all by chawly · · Score: 1

    Is it controlled by Linux ?

    --
    How many beans make five, anyhow ? ... Charles Walmsley