Slashdot Mirror


Space Lichens

moon_monkey writes "According to a report lichens - a composite of algae and fungi - can survive in space for up to two weeks. An experiment carried out by the European Space Agency saw two species of lichen carried into orbit and then exposed to the vacuum of space for nearly 15 days. These are the most complex form of life now known to have survived prolonged exposure to space. The experiment adds weight to the theory of panspermia - that life could somehow be transported between planets."

250 comments

  1. impressive? by kevin.fowler · · Score: 2, Funny

    If they need more test subjects, my shower walls have plenty of fungus to donate.

    --
    Bury me in mashed potatoes.
    1. Re:impressive? by SpaceLifeForm · · Score: 1
      Ahhh. So that's where newSCO came from.

      Not intelligent, but hard to eradicate.

      --
      You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.
    2. Re:impressive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there is this sweet new tech blog, you should check it

    3. Re:impressive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      are you saying that we EVOLVED from lichens? blasphamy!

      -FSM follower

    4. Re:impressive? by PetriBORG · · Score: 1

      I'm sure the fungus on most geeks bathroom walls are already super strains, do we really need to send them to space where they can become super-mutate strains of fungus? We may have more then talking coffee mugs soon...

      --
      Pete/Petri "damn, my chainsaw is clogged with 1's and 0's again." --clyde
    5. Re:impressive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they need test subjects, my shower wall is full of sperm they can use...

    6. Re:impressive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL

    7. Re:impressive? by famebait · · Score: 1

      I'm sure the fungus on most geeks bathroom walls are already super strains,

      Nah, you'd need some evolutionary pressure, something for them to resist, in order to get truly tough strains. Spoiled and pampered geek-fungi just won't cut it.

      --
      sudo ergo sum
  2. panspermia by krgallagher · · Score: 4, Funny

    I thought panspermia came from flute playing goats.

    --

    Insert Generic Sig Here:

    1. Re:Panspermia by theJML · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, and even if they were able to hit escape veolcity, I wonder if they tried an atmospheric re-entry test.

      Tosty mold, coming right up!

      --
      -=JML=-
    2. Re:Panspermia by bersl2 · · Score: 1

      Please, this is Slashdot. We ought only talk about the performance specifications of our e-penes here.

    3. Re:Panspermia by Nova1313 · · Score: 1

      lol i had to read that one twice. I'm slow. But If I had mod points you would get them

      --
      There exists some positive integer N that you are the Nth person to read this signature.
    4. Re:panspermia by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      This was covered recently in an episode of Nip/Tuck on FX, but they used little jars instead of pans.

    5. Re:panspermia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spermiform mars?

    6. Re:Panspermia by charlesbakerharris · · Score: 1

      For some of us, performance is never a question!

    7. Re:Panspermia by RatBastard · · Score: 1

      Exactly. at some point you are faced with the final "Well, where did the FIRST life come from". Just saying that life came from "out there" is passing the buck.

      --
      Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
    8. Re:Panspermia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Escape velocity isn't needed. The storms in our atmosphere are quite capable of lofting mold spores and bacteria into the upper atmosphere where the solar wind can pick it up. In all probability, Earth has already "contaminated" the Moon and Mars with Earth microorginisms caried on the solar wind.

    9. Re:Panspermia by charlesbakerharris · · Score: 1

      I don't think you were sufficiently grossed out by my original post - you seem to have taken it seriously!

    10. Re:panspermia by ThankfulJosh · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I really can't believe that anyone takes panspermia seriously. They are saying it's too hard to believe that life originated here, so let's postulate that there's a more hospital place life could have originated. And that life somehow got ejected from its homeworld without being damaged. Then it traveled through empty, 2.3 kelvin or so space for millions, probably billions of years. It somehow stayed alive, or at least intact enough for its genetic material to survive. Then it entered the earth's atmosphere, necessarily at tens of thousands of miles per hour, and survived that, too. And it survived impact with the ground. Sounds about as plausible as spontaneous generation to me. But the possiblility of God actually existing is "ridiculous."

    11. Re:panspermia by WraithRealm · · Score: 1

      If I had mod points, I'd be modding you +5 Informative.

      It's nice to finally see someone who paid attention during astronomy/astrophysics.

      --
      I aim to misbehave.
    12. Re:Panspermia by n54 · · Score: 1

      Hush, please don't further annoy and frustrate all the scientists who desperately do not want to admit that they don't have a good detailed answer with proof concerning the origin of life ;)

      --
      this comment is provided "as is" and without any express or implied legibility or congruity [...]
    13. Re:Panspermia by homebrewmike · · Score: 1

      Hush, please don't further annoy and frustrate all the scientists who desperately do not want to admit that they don't have a good detailed answer with proof concerning the origin of life ;)

      That may be true, but it sure beats the alternative. Either way books will need to be written and a certain book more people will object to editing... "And God dropped slime from the heavens, and said it was good. He then said go forth and multiply, unless conditions are too unfavorable, in which case, take a nap."

    14. Re:Panspermia by n54 · · Score: 1

      Hmm you know there's actually other alternatives around, like simply admitting we don't really know yet. That honest answer is the best one in my opinion both because it's honest (d'oh!) and because it doesn't detract from further research by making it all into a flamefest between atheists/agnostics and believers (a flamefest which is totally irrelevant and hinders science).

      But I guess that's no good if one desperaterly wants to believe science says anything either for or against the possibility of a deity...

      A lot of people who think they're science-friendly or religion-friendly haven't realized (or don't want to) that science can only say something about the scientific (testable/repeatable/verifiable systematic observations and so on), everything else is speculation (which is ok as long as one doesn't pretend it's anything else).

      --
      this comment is provided "as is" and without any express or implied legibility or congruity [...]
    15. Re:panspermia by VultureMN · · Score: 1

      There's a recent article in Scientific American about the possibility of Mars->Earth transfer of organisms. It turns out that it isn't that far-fetched at all. (Meaning that it -could- happen, not that it -did- happen).

      I'd have to agree with you that exchanging organisms between solar systems does seem rather far-fetched.

    16. Re:panspermia by The+Nine · · Score: 1

      2.3 Kelvin? I thought it was closer to 3?

    17. Re:panspermia by SETIGuy · · Score: 2, Informative
      2.3 Kelvin? I thought it was closer to 3?

      He must be from the future. Today the microwave background is 2.73K. Wait 2.5 billion years and it'll be 2.3K.

      That said, in interstellar space the radiation field is a significantly higher temperature than that. 50-100K or so might be more typical within the galaxy.

    18. Re:panspermia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Consider that the life may have arrived before the earth itself had formed, from an imapct on a planet/moon with far less mass therefore far less gravity you have no reentry or massive velocities, and most of the whole trip the life wouldacouldabeen frozen. All I need to do is prove taht it could happena nd that asteroids woudl have become part of the eath sometime after the "big bang" and I have a working theory that fits neatly into evolution. Hang on, I need to finish typing up to the paper on this, I am quite certain the USPO will have no porblem with my original creation. If someone proves me correct then I lose to prior art but still will get noted for my research and possibly if lucky, might be mentioned sometime in the future on slashdot! woohoo!!!

      P.S. God can't exist. Life would really suck if he really did exist and meant what he wrote and we ignored it. wait a sec....

  3. Already done with mold by plover · · Score: 2, Informative
    I think they already did this experiment under another name: MIR. My understanding is the primary reason they brought MIR down rather than rehabilitate it was the presence of mold that they could not kill using means that weren't also toxic to the cosmonauts.

    They didn't describe the details of the flight. Was this a mission to the ISS? If so, I wonder how much risk they took by "opening" the box in the presence of the station? Could they have infected it with lichens, or more likely with "tramp mold" spores that may have accompanied the lichens?

    --
    John
    1. Re:Already done with mold by Gabe+Garza · · Score: 5, Informative

      Not the same thing. The mold you're talking about in MIR would have been in the crew compartment, which, unless there's something I don't know about Russians, wouldn't have been a vacuum. The lichens discussed in the article were in a sealed container that, once the craft was in space, was opened. So they were completely exposed to the vacuum of space.

    2. Re:Already done with mold by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      The mold in MIR was inside the station where there was air and moisture. Why would it be the least bit surprising that mold could grow where humans can live? This experiment was carried out outside the spacecraft wher there is neither air nor moisture.

      And no, the mold problem was not why they brought down MIR.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    3. Re:Already done with mold by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      My understanding is the primary reason they brought MIR down rather than rehabilitate it was the presence of mold that they could not kill using means that weren't also toxic to the cosmonauts.

      Hate to break it to you, but MY understanding is that exposure to space is also toxic to astronauts.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    4. Re:Already done with mold by Dread_ed · · Score: 1

      With MIR the fungus/mold was on the inside of the spacecraft. It traveled up with the microbe filled meatbags that the MIR was designed to provide a habitat for.

      As for treating the mold/mildew/fungus, we have the same problems even on Earth. The chemical vulnerabilities that the mold cell has are similar to those of human cells. Because of this it is difficult to treat any kind of fungus infection in humans without hurting the human as well.

      For instance, most anti-fungal treatments are so toxic that they are closely monitored by a physician when administered. Consider Lamisil. It is a common drug proscribed for fingernail and toenail fungus. Taking this drug can cause permanent liver and kidney damage even if taken in properly proscribed doses. Even then, it takes months of treatment to get the proper effects beause at the active dose it is killing the fungus as a very slow rate. Any higher and the toxicicity to the patient reaches levels that can be very dangerous for them.

      As for the ISS it probably already is "infected" with mold spores. They are inside and on the people who come up there. If the conditions are right they will start to grow inside the thing. I would think that maintaining proper temperature and humidity would help to combat this, however, as these simple organisms are hardy and insanely well adapted to growing just about anywhere I will assume that even the ISS will eventually need to be scrapped in a similar manner as the MIR.

      --
      When the only tool you have is a claw hammer every problem starts to look like the back of someone's skull.
    5. Re:Already done with mold by DerekLyons · · Score: 1
      I think they already did this experiment under another name: MIR.
      Not the same thing - the mold on MIR was on the crew compartment, inside the station. The mold in TFA was exposed to space.
      My understanding is the primary reason they brought MIR down rather than rehabilitate it was the presence of mold that they could not kill using means that weren't also toxic to the cosmonauts.
      No. MIR was brought down because it's systems were increasingly unreliable and it could not be overhauled on orbit.
  4. They needed space to test a vacuum? by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 1

    They needed to go into space to test a vacuum?

    Maybe they wanted to test radiation, or is this just a high-profile confirmation of something we already knew?

    1. Re:They needed space to test a vacuum? by doyoulikegoatseeee · · Score: 1
      from TFA: The lichens were subjected to the vacuum of space and to temperatures ranging from -20C on the night side of the Earth, to 20C on the sunlit side. They were also exposed to glaring ultraviolet radiation of the Sun.

      The organisms have already been shown to be capable of withstand high levels of UV radiation on Earth.

    2. Re:They needed space to test a vacuum? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The vacuum of space is much more than just a vacuum. You have the cosmic radiation and the frigid temperatures...

    3. Re:They needed space to test a vacuum? by RoffleTheWaffle · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They likely brought it into space in order to determine whether or not it could survive not just in a vaccuum, but also under these conditions, all at the same time:

      * Vaccuum. (Of course.)
      * Assorted forms of radiation.
      * Zero gravity.
      * Extremes of temperature.

      Those conditions tend not to support life from Earth, and so to see that lichen can indeed survive in space, if only for a short time, is astounding. Not only does this add weight to the panspermia theory, but it also could stand to change our take on the 'qualifications' for a habitable environment completely, raising questions such as, "Could it be possible for more complex organisms to actually thrive in space?"

      I for one welcome our moldy overlords.

    4. Re:They needed space to test a vacuum? by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 1

      OK, I'll bite. Mycon Overloads...http://uqm.stack.nl/wiki/Mycon/

    5. Re:They needed space to test a vacuum? by IAmTheDave · · Score: 1
      panspermia theory, but it also could stand to change our take on the 'qualifications' for a habitable environment completely, raising questions such as, "Could it be possible for more complex organisms to actually thrive in space?"

      Thank you! This is the question people seem to be skirting. Life as "we know it" is really just "as we know it." Certain people assume that water is essential for life. That life is carbon based. These are only linchpins of life on EARTH.

      So the "panspermia" theory is nice but why doesn't it exist alongside another theory of space as a habitable ecosystem? The audacity to assume that an organism can't survive in any environment is quite base. For years scientists didn't think organisms could survive temperatures outside of the Earth's most common conditions, and then BAM! Life which thrives in thousands of degrees of temperature in those lava/heat funnels on the ocean floor. (Sorry, don't know what they're called.)

      Point is, if earth-bound life can survive for ANY time period in space, what's to say that some creature elsewhere hasn't evolved to survive a full lifetime in space? Because there is no water? Please...

      --
      Excuse my speling.
      Making The Bar Project
    6. Re:They needed space to test a vacuum? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Juffa-wup is life?

    7. Re:They needed space to test a vacuum? by Perfesser+Einstein · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      They needed space test the gullibility of government agencies to fund specious, unnecessary, and expen$ive "experiments". You rightly point out that any of these experiments, probably even the weightless one, could be cheaply done right here on boring old planet Earth. Think of all of the other scientific and educational projects that could have been explored with that money.

      --
      Illi mors gravis incubat qui notus nimis omnibus ignotus moritur sibi.
    8. Re:They needed space to test a vacuum? by RoffleTheWaffle · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Substances like water, carbon, and oxygen are neat because they seem to be the most condusive to forming complex substances that make up the organic components of the bodies of living things. It's silly to think that there aren't living things that can exist without water, though. Or carbon. Or oxygen.

      Theories about the possible environments wherein living things could exist are endless. Looking at the extremophilic algae and tube worms - That was the name you were looking for, I believe - here on Earth, we could see similar creatures living in the hot, highly acidic, CO2 rich environments of Venus. Lichens and other organisms tailored to exist only on the essentials, on the other hand, could thrive - and may actually exist - on Mars. (And if Mars was once like Earth, that theory certainly takes off, doesn't it?) Of course, those schools of thought only support organisms akin to the ones that exist here on Earth.

      Meanwhile, the moons of Jupiter and Saturn provide a plethora of environments known to support life on Earth in some cases, but there are also theories that organisms could exist in the extreme cold of some of these celestial bodies by catalyzing acetylene and other volatile substances at extremely slow rates. If that theory were to pan out, then the idea of 'ice creatures from outer space' might not be too far off - and possibly a springboard for dozens of cheesy new sci-fi movies. (It'd certainly beat Spielburg's take on 'War of the Worlds'.)

      While we're discussing theoretical models for living things unlike those that exist here on Earth, let's take a look at what we're made of - that all-important element carbon, I'm no chemistry expert, but doesn't boron nitride behave in a remarkably similar fashion to carbon? What about the possibility of a boron-based group of organisms? Or maybe plants and animals composed of different substances entirely? When one begins to consider the possibilities, it becomes immediately evident that they are indeed virtually endless.

      The void of space may indeed host living things. Other worlds thought to be uninhabitable may also support life as well. I agree that it'd be pretty silly to disregard that possibility until we can conclusively prove that life simply can't thrive in these environments. Heck, maybe there's some kind of lichen out in some nebula somewhere, feeding off of plasma... Who knows.

    9. Re:They needed space to test a vacuum? by B3ryllium · · Score: 1

      I'd be interested to hear your ideas on how the weightlessness portion of the experiment could be replicated on Earth?

      At the most, I think we can achieve seven or eight minutes of simulated weightlessness. The experiment called for an extended period of exposure time to a constant weightless state, while simulatenously being bombarded with cosmic radiation, a vacuum, and countless insults. ("You worthless mold! Lazy fungus!")

    10. Re:They needed space to test a vacuum? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thousands of degrees? Try ~130 degrees C.

      link

    11. Re:They needed space to test a vacuum? by TotalReflection · · Score: 1

      "so to see that lichen can indeed survive in space, if only for a short time.."

      The headline is wrong. TFA says that they were alive and well when they came back to earth after being exposed for 15 days. So for all we know, they can survive in space indefinately.

    12. Re:They needed space to test a vacuum? by RoffleTheWaffle · · Score: 1

      Very interesting. So this wasn't an average lifespan of the lichen in space... I wonder if further tests will determine just how long the lichens can actually last out there.

    13. Re:They needed space to test a vacuum? by XMorbius · · Score: 1

      "Ok, I'll bite."
      Alright, so, first off that term is incredibly cocky, but what exactly was he supposedly luring you with anyway?

    14. Re:They needed space to test a vacuum? by whereiswaldo · · Score: 1

      The article mentioned that the temperature went as low as -20 Celcius on the dark side of the Earth.
      I always thought the vacuum of space was much colder than that. I mean, there are places here on Earth that have colder temperatures! Can anyone explain this?

    15. Re:They needed space to test a vacuum? by Perfesser+Einstein · · Score: 0

      Well, I ain't no physicist, but I'm thinking, in terms of a lichen (not any higher organisms, but then that's not what they were experimenting on) slowly rotating a chamber would mean that any moisture or internal fluids in the organism would have no consistent direction of up or down. What else would be affected, in terms of a simple organism like a lichen, by weightlessness? Probably not its nervous system. Maybe the movement of intracellular bodies, like the DNA during reproduction, but even this is probably more dependent on the forces of the physics of the cellular processs than on the force of gravity. The cosmic radiation part could be done in a lab with other artifical sources of particles similar to those in cosmic radiation. Lastly, the vacuum part is fairly simple. Sorry if I don't word my messages very diplomatically, or it sounded like I am against spending big money on little experiments, but I am. A few years ago NASA made a big deal about how during a shuttle flight they were going to test the effects of weightlessness on the longevity of incandescent light bulbs.

      --
      Illi mors gravis incubat qui notus nimis omnibus ignotus moritur sibi.
  5. So this means Little Green Men DO exist! by Banner · · Score: 1

    Cause they're all made of algae and fungi!!! It's the 'greys' that are a myth!

  6. Panspermia by charlesbakerharris · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sounds like a neat theory, but it'd have to be an absolutely killer climax to have it hit escape velocity. I can't usually get more than 7-8 feet of distance even on a pent-up, high-pressure day.

  7. Adds weight? by MosesJones · · Score: 2, Interesting


    But not much, 2 weeks doesn't even get you to Mars... I thought most of the theories of life coming from other planets were based around elements being embedded inside rocks etc rather than being directly exposed to space.

    But it is nice to see Europe continuing to treat Space as a learning experience rather than a PR stunt.

    --
    An Eye for an Eye will make the whole world blind - Gandhi
    1. Re:Adds weight? by misleb · · Score: 1

      Also, we're most likely talking about seeds/spores and not the organisms themselves.

      -matthew

      --
      "THERE IS NO JUSTICE, THERE IS ONLY ME." -Death
    2. Re:Adds weight? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For many organisms that go dormant, two weeks or two years makes little difference. And if it's really cold, then two weeks or two million years makes little difference.

    3. Re:Adds weight? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2 weeks can easily get you to mars...if you go fast enough. What kind of velocities would escaping matter travel at if it were displaced by a large collision? Who knows it might get here in 1 week

  8. Obligatory by Digitus1337 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I for one, welcome out new space-faring algae lichens. As a D&D player I've seen what regular lich can do, but I was unaware of their resistances to space. I truely am scared and confused.

    1. Re:Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lichens have nothing to do with undead mages, they're Werewolves or something, right?

  9. 15 days? by NetNinja · · Score: 1

    Ok so they jumped of Haley's comet and landed on earth?
    It took a week to get to the moon via the Apollo missons.

    AHHHHH! Wrong answer! Speculate some more.

    1. Re:15 days? by MetaPhyzx · · Score: 1

      It took two days to get to the moon, you mean.
      not a week.

      --
      Blacker than my baby girl's stare. Black like the veil that the muslimina wear. Black like the planet that they fear...
    2. Re:15 days? by flyinwhitey · · Score: 1

      You've obviously never heard the term "proof of concept".

      --
      How pathetic are you that you follow me from topic to topic and waste all your mod points at once modding me down?
    3. Re:15 days? by MankyD · · Score: 1

      Correct, the lichens can only last 15 days, but this part is key: "the most complex form of life now known to have survived prolonged exposure to space." It doesn't mean that the lichens are the capsule of inter-planetary life. It implies that there may very well be some forms of life capable of long-term space exposure. This is a single terrestrial lichen. There are plenty of reasons to believe that there exist other, more extremophile like organisms that can surpass the lichen in logevity.

      --
      -dave
      http://millionnumbers.com/ - own the number of your dreams
    4. Re:15 days? by B3ryllium · · Score: 1

      You can hardly blame him for it; neither has the USPTO.

    5. Re:15 days? by Prophet+of+Nixon · · Score: 1

      The article doesn't say that lichens can only last 15 days. It says that they got the capsule back in 15 days and the lichen were perfectly fine, same as on the launch. This did not establish any upper bound for lichen survivability.

  10. an organic spaceship patch kit? by swanriversean · · Score: 5, Interesting

    FTA:
    "Lichens have a tough mineral coating that could shield them from UV rays. They are also made from individual organisms layered on top of one another, so outer layers may provide protection for underlying cells. The organisms have already been shown to be capable of withstand high levels of UV radiation on Earth."

    This is interesting, I wonder how well they the outer layers could protect things below? Would it be possible to use some lichen in a pinch to make a repair to part of a ship? Could this be the poor mans self-replicating nano robot patch kit?

    I have no idea about these things, just an interesting prospect, I think.

    --
    Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind. - Dr. Seus
    1. Re:an organic spaceship patch kit? by MarkTina · · Score: 1

      Well it might work, but if you are and a space craft with a hole in it would you be prepared to wait 30 years fot the lichen to grow over the gap ? :-)

    2. Re:an organic spaceship patch kit? by gstoddart · · Score: 1
      This is interesting, I wonder how well they the outer layers could protect things below? Would it be possible to use some lichen in a pinch to make a repair to part of a ship? Could this be the poor mans self-replicating nano robot patch kit?

      You'd probably have issues on re-entry. At those temperatures, most anything organic would basically evaporate wouldn't they?
      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    3. Re:an organic spaceship patch kit? by john_uy · · Score: 1

      maybe they can be modified to be able to protect other harmful items such as radiation. then you will have to coat them instead of spending a thick layer of lead for example to remove it.

      --
      Live your life each day as if it was your last.
  11. At least two weeks, not up to. by The+Metahacker · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Up to two weeks?"

    No, "At *least* two weeks". They were exposed for 15 days and were unchanged.

    Lichen and spores are sure durable; I wouldn't be surprised if they could survive basically indefinitely in a cold vacuum.

  12. If it can survive 2 weeks in the vacuum of space.. by gg3po · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...how much better can this stuff fare in the thin atmosphere of Mars? Time to start terraforming!

    --
    ---
  13. Feasibility of Panspermia by sssmashy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Even if a lichen or lower life form could survive for a time in the vacuum of space (with some form of protection from radiation and in hibernation mode), could it really survive the intense heat from the friction of earth's atmosphere? I've heard of extremophiles, but...

    1. Re:Feasibility of Panspermia by plover · · Score: 3, Insightful
      TFA says the layers are mineral based, and if there are enough layers I suppose the outer ones could ablate on reentry providing protection to the layers beneath. It's possible it would provide enough protection for some spores on the bottom most layers to survive.

      What I've never understood about that theory, though, is how the life forms got off their home planet and onto an interstellar-bound rock.

      --
      John
    2. Re:Feasibility of Panspermia by Decaff · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What I've never understood about that theory, though, is how the life forms got off their home planet and onto an interstellar-bound rock.

      Asteroid strikes. They can 'splash' up a lot of material, which can easily reach escape velocity.

    3. Re:Feasibility of Panspermia by nmos · · Score: 1

      I was watching "Naked Science" the other night and one of the scientists mentioned that asteroids only spend a very short time in the atmosphere before hitting the ground and as a result only the outside few mm gets very hot.

    4. Re:Feasibility of Panspermia by tm2b · · Score: 2, Informative
      What I've never understood about that theory, though, is how the life forms got off their home planet and onto an interstellar-bound rock.
      Via ejecta, large pieces of debris that are thrown off the planet from meteor strikes. That's the significance of the Mars rocks found in the Antarctic tundra.

      If you've got life floating around in your atmosphere, it might not even require ejecta but instead just near collisions with porous asteroids passing through the upper atmosphere.
      --
      "It is our blasphemy which has made us great, and will sustain us, and which the gods secretly admire in us." - Zelazny
    5. Re:Feasibility of Panspermia by temojen · · Score: 3, Funny

      Rockets maybe... What better way to make absolutely clear to any intelligent life on another planet that there is life where you are from than hucking some of it at them?

    6. Re:Feasibility of Panspermia by ZachPruckowski · · Score: 1

      My issue is this: Ok, rock leaves planet with life. Via meteor ejecta or whatever. There are a whole heck of a lot of trajectories. How does it ever hit another planet? I mean, the planets in the galaxy must be like a millionth of a billionth of a percent of the volume. And gravity would be working against the meteor with life on it. Even a near miss is useless (or even worse, would destroy some of the life on the meteor, if not the actual meteor).

      Essentially, it seems like being spun around blindfold, then told to hit a target in somewhere in football stadium with a gun bullet from midfield (American football, the big stadiums). Its possible to get a lucky shot, but you need billions of rounds. And to me that means billions of pieces of splashed-up rock from meteor strikes, which means the original planet would have been nuked beyond all comprehension long before there were that many ejecta (is that the term?). Sure, it's possible we're a lucky, one in a million shot, but that seems unlikely...

    7. Re:Feasibility of Panspermia by B3ryllium · · Score: 1

      There's this force called "Gravity"; objects with a large and/or dense mass displace the space around them, creating an attractive force that drawns in surrounding objects - albeit at a slow speed. Over many eons, a sufficient gravitational force could attract many interstellar and intergallactic visitors of various shapes and sizes.

    8. Re:Feasibility of Panspermia by ZachPruckowski · · Score: 1

      See, but there are these things called stars, black holes, nebulae, etc. Big, massive, lots of gravity, but not suitable for life. Life would need to land on a solid planet, and the gravity effects of a planet are dwarfed by the nearby star(s). So my point stands. Very low odds of hitting a planet.

    9. Re:Feasibility of Panspermia by B3ryllium · · Score: 1

      On a long enough timeline, the probability of hitting *something* is almost certain. Given many of these ejecta events, one could feasibly argue that the odds of hitting something solid are much greater than what you are alluding to.

    10. Re:Feasibility of Panspermia by snadrus · · Score: 1

      If it's going to drop onto a young earth covered in volcanoes whose ashes will soon become an atmosphere, then surviving the fall is closer to reasonable. Especially if it has plenty of water to land in.

      --
      Science & open-source build trust from peer review. Learn systems you can trust.
    11. Re:Feasibility of Panspermia by Formica · · Score: 1

      Despite that, metorites don't seem to have trouble striking the earth, moon, other planets, etc., even from outside the solar system (e.g. Oort cloud).

    12. Re:Feasibility of Panspermia by phylomon · · Score: 1

      From what I have read, the heat of re-entry is usually exagerated. The interior of meteorite is cold. Google "taggish lake meteorite" and you will see that this carbonaceous chondrite landed on a frozen lake in Canada, was gathered by an alert person and "kept" cold in his freezer so the volatiles would not sublimate away. In other words, it was cold when it hit the ground. The reading I have done seems to suggest that surviving re-entry inside a meteorite would not be that hard.

      --
      My wife says I'm impossible. I'm not. I'm just extremely unlikely. There's a difference...
    13. Re:Feasibility of Panspermia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anthropic principle. If life here originated somewhere else then obviously it did land on earth since we are here to observe it.

      or, as I like to think of it:

      Any result predicated on ones own existence can provide no new information.

    14. Re:Feasibility of Panspermia by lcllam · · Score: 1

      Meteor showers? Some of the material on the 'hit' body would no doubt shower upwards and possibly ONTO meteors that do not impact.

    15. Re:Feasibility of Panspermia by clean_stoner · · Score: 1

      Parent is insightful, not funny... or maybe both.

      --

      Sigs are for the weak.

  14. Reminds me of an old joke by Jeld · · Score: 5, Funny

    Question: How long can a human stay in space without a space suit?
    Answer: Almost indefinitely <evil grin>

    --

    Everybody Lies. But it doesn't matter since nobody listens.

    1. Re:Reminds me of an old joke by midnightblaze · · Score: 1

      In all seriousness, I read somewhere that a human can survive in space without a suit for 30 seconds. I was all, woah.

    2. Re:Reminds me of an old joke by Xugumad · · Score: 1

      Got to admit, wouldn't want to try. Although, for any /.'ers faced with being thrown out an airlock, I believe the correct procedure is to breathe out (you really, REALLY do not want your lungs full of gas when you hit vacuum), curl up to protect your eyes, mouth, etc. as much as possible, and pray to the diety with which you have most influence currently.

    3. Re:Reminds me of an old joke by KylePflug · · Score: 1

      I read that too. In the hitchhiker's guide to the galaxy.

      Come to think of it, I wonder if that's a scientifically accurate claim. I mean, most of that book is trustworthy...

    4. Re:Reminds me of an old joke by orkysoft · · Score: 1

      Well, it's probably more scientifically accurate than the Bible...

      --

      I suffer from attention surplus disorder.
    5. Re:Reminds me of an old joke by The+Nine · · Score: 1

      In Bruce Sterling's Schismatrix, the main character dives between two docked space vehicles without a suit, being in space for maybe twenty seconds, and makes it with nothing more than a blood nose. That really kind of shocked me and had me wondering if it were really possible. I mean, okay, it's a science fiction book, sure, but I don't really understand the biological reasons for space-death well enough to be able to dismiss it out of hand. It'd be really eerie if that were true.

      The temperature extremes have me wondering. It's freaking cold out there, but at the same time you're in a vacuum so there's nothing for your body heat to conduct out to and you'd only cool by radiation. I'm not really sure what the emissivity of the human body is. And, y'know, when I said "without a suit" I didn't mean "completely naked" but more "without a sealed helmet and stuff", so I guess heat loss by radiation would be limited to the extremities? I dunno.

    6. Re:Reminds me of an old joke by qeveren · · Score: 1

      Here's the word on human vacuum exposure from NASA themselves. You can likely survive two minutes or so of hard vacuum exposure without serious injury; after that, you start getting busy with that whole dying thing.

      --
      Don't just stand there, get that other dog!
  15. Obligatory NetHack by DanTheLewis · · Score: 5, Funny

    This space lichen corpse tastes terrible! You finish eating the space lichen corpse.

    --

    Q: What did the comedian say to the crowd?
    A: If I knew, this joke would be funny.
    1. Re:Obligatory NetHack by Morgalyn · · Score: 1

      Now I am left wondering the effect of eating space lichen, since many of its class brethren confer special effects... perhaps a mild chill?

      --
      You say you got a real solution
      Well, you know
      We'd all love to see the plan
      (The Beatles)
    2. Re:Obligatory NetHack by DanTheLewis · · Score: 1

      You become self-knowledgeable...

      You are cold-resistant.
      You are blind.

      --

      Q: What did the comedian say to the crowd?
      A: If I knew, this joke would be funny.
    3. Re:Obligatory NetHack by Morgalyn · · Score: 1

      You feel a mild buzz... ?

      --
      You say you got a real solution
      Well, you know
      We'd all love to see the plan
      (The Beatles)
    4. Re:Obligatory NetHack by falzer · · Score: 1

      What happens when you eat an arch-lichen?

    5. Re:Obligatory NetHack by n54 · · Score: 1

      This space lichen corpse tastes terrible! You finish eating the space lichen corpse. You polymorph into a small green man. You hear godly laughter from above. "Oh wow! Everything looks so cosmic!". You are stressed.

      YASD ;)

      --
      this comment is provided "as is" and without any express or implied legibility or congruity [...]
    6. Re:Obligatory NetHack by syrinx · · Score: 1

      ah, you beat me by a minute to a Nethack reference.

      --
      Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.
    7. Re:Obligatory NetHack by DanTheLewis · · Score: 1

      Well, I've only been playing it for about a year, so the flush of first love hasn't quite worn off yet.

      --

      Q: What did the comedian say to the crowd?
      A: If I knew, this joke would be funny.
  16. Etymology of "panspermia" ... aren't YOU curious? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    From answers.com citing the American Heritage Dictionary,
    the etymology of panspermia:
    Greek panspermia;, mixture of all seeds : pan-, pan- + sperma, seed
    ... no hint of interplanetary relations by the root words.

  17. Terraforming by Arthur+B. · · Score: 1

    SO how long before they send lichen to mars... ok the fa says they do not metabolize and "suspend" in space... but maybe if ton of lichens were sent to mars, maybe some tiny fraction of it would start surviving and developping...

    --
    \u262D = \u5350
    1. Re:Terraforming by Bob+of+Dole · · Score: 1

      And then we'd never be able to find out if there is life on mars, cause our mold is now growing all over it.

      (NASA is VERY careful with their probes to prevent exactly this from happening)

  18. they may not die in space... by syrinx · · Score: 2, Funny

    And yet the lichens die pretty easily, even with a plain +0 pickaxe or short sword. Their corpses stay good indefinitely though, which is helpful when I'm playing with a vegetarian or vegan #conduct.

    --
    Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.
    1. Re:they may not die in space... by planetoid · · Score: 2, Funny

      What frightened the bejesus out of me is I read the title as "Space Liches".

      --
      Slashdot requires you to wait longer between hitting 'reply' and submitting a comment.
  19. That's Not What the Article Said by Greyfox · · Score: 4, Informative
    The article states that the lichens were exposed to space for 2 weeks and were fine after that. The summary implies that 2 weeks is the upper limit for survival of the lichens. Those are two rather different outcomes.

    What I get from this is that lichens can survive for an undetermined amount of time in space. Assuming they can survive reentry, a rock from Earth could potentially deliver lichens to Mars or elsewhere.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    1. Re:That's Not What the Article Said by digidave · · Score: 1

      And it's an important distinction because two weeks in space on a rock will get you nowhere.

      --
      The global economy is a great thing until you feel it locally.
    2. Re:That's Not What the Article Said by ArsonSmith · · Score: 3, Funny

      Is that why I've spent my whole life on a rock in space and gotten nowhere?

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
  20. What next? by Billosaur · · Score: 1, Funny

    Now that we know lichens can survive exposed to the harsh conditions of space, how about we try it with Karl Rove?

    --
    GetOuttaMySpace - The Anti-Social Network
    1. Re:What next? by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

      Now that we know lichens can survive exposed to the harsh conditions of space, how about we try it with Karl Rove?

      The similarities between lichen and scum are only superficial. Still, I'm in favour of the experiment. As a control subject, let's also send up Cheney.

    2. Re:What next? by Billosaur · · Score: 1

      To be fair, we should broaden the subject base. Shall we say, Martha Stewart?

      --
      GetOuttaMySpace - The Anti-Social Network
    3. Re:What next? by Mr.Surly · · Score: 1

      No, we should try using a *higher* form of life next. Going backwards isn't much good.

    4. Re:What next? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lichens silly, not parasites, can survive. Parasites need a host, send Bush too.

    5. Re:What next? by RevWhite · · Score: 0

      Wouldn't the point of the experiment be to see if he didn't survive?

      --
      Hey, can I bum a sig?
  21. Stuff the lichen in a twinkie... by bagboy · · Score: 1

    I bet it could make it to mars and back....

    1. Re:Stuff the lichen in a twinkie... by NelsonM · · Score: 1

      Stuffing a lichen inside of a twinkie in space actually takes you back in time.

    2. Re:Stuff the lichen in a twinkie... by fbjon · · Score: 1

      Only if it has an orbital angular velocity of 88 degrees per hour.

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
  22. Evolution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And you thought some folks were upset about descending from apes, wait till they see this.

    1. Re:Evolution by Havokmon · · Score: 1
      And you thought some folks were upset about descending from apes, wait till they see this.

      No kidding. Some people just can't accept God was actually a Reeses Monkey, and the Soddom and Gammorah were really destroyed by a massive rain of terds.

      --
      "I can't give you a brain, so I'll give you a diploma" - The Great Oz (blatently stolen sig)
    2. Re:Evolution by DanTheLewis · · Score: 1
      And you thought some folks were upset about descending from apes, wait till they see this.

      No kidding. Some people just can't accept God was actually a Reeses Monkey, and the Soddom and Gammorah were really destroyed by a massive rain of terds.


      It's Rhesus, Sodom, Gomorrah, and turds.

      That ape story is starting to sound more and more plausible.
      --

      Q: What did the comedian say to the crowd?
      A: If I knew, this joke would be funny.
    3. Re:Evolution by Woldry · · Score: 1

      Maybe he's envisioning a monkey made out of chocolate-coated peanut butter?

      --
      How can a post be modded "overrated" or "underrated" when it hasn't been rated yet?
    4. Re:Evolution by DanTheLewis · · Score: 1

      Vampire commercial:

      Dracula: I like to eat the omniscience... first.
      Announcer: There's no wrong way...
      Dracula: Blaa!
      Announcer: To eat a deity.

      --

      Q: What did the comedian say to the crowd?
      A: If I knew, this joke would be funny.
  23. Panspermia by Traa · · Score: 1

    Though I am not up to date on the latest speculations regarding panspermia, I never really considered it such an interesting option. So what that life-ON-EARTH came from another planet, that doesn't answer the question as to how life got started. It just means it got started someplace else in quite probably the same way that we think it might have gotten started on earth (thermal vents + rich molecule soup + anything but the hand of god :-)

  24. composite!!?? COMPOSITE??!!!!!! by acornboy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    geez you guys are supposed to be geeks, right? Well get the details right, that would be a symbiois not a composite! And i thought anything close to "symbiont" would warm the cockles of your geeky trekkie hearts...

    1. Re:composite!!?? COMPOSITE??!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This guy is in denial. He is clearly a geek.

  25. "Panspermia" by BronxBomber · · Score: 3, Funny
    Seen it a few times now. Peter North, Asia Carrera, and a very eager Jenna Jameson. Great money shots.

    Oh wait...

    --
    ...both interiorlly, and exteriorlly.
  26. This immediately reminded me of... by nekoniku · · Score: 1
    --
    "It's a wonderful idea. But it doesn't work." -- Tad Danielewski
  27. Surviving in space by Prince+Vegeta+SSJ4 · · Score: 2, Funny

    pffft that's nothing, I've survived in space for over 30 years. ohhhhh, OUTERspace

  28. Latest Issue of Scientific American by leather_helmet · · Score: 2, Informative

    Has a great article, with pertty pictures and diagrams, regarding panspermia

    http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?chanID=sa006&colI D=1&articleID=00073A97-5745-1359-94FF83414B7F0000

  29. I liken this lichen is alien by digitaldc · · Score: 4, Informative

    "Lichens grow in the leftover spots of the natural world that are too harsh or limited for most other organisms. They are pioneers on bare rock, desert sand, cleared soil , dead wood, animal bones, rusty metal, and living bark. Able to shut down metabolically during periods of unfavorable conditions, they can survive extremes of heat, cold, and drought."

    From: http://www.lichen.com/biology.html

    They tend to thrive in unfavorable conditions, maybe there could be Lichen on Mars if it had a more stable atmosphere? They could also survive on a rusty hull of a space ship, so the panspermia theory is not too far off.

    British Soldier Lichen is also very beautiful:
    http://www.buenavistatownship.org/Photos/British%2 0soldier%20lichen.jpg

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
    1. Re:I liken this lichen is alien by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would it need an atmosphere at all? Mars sounds favorable to lichens as-is.

    2. Re:I liken this lichen is alien by digitaldc · · Score: 1

      Lichen uses nitrogen and carbon dioxide to help produce its nutrients in harsh environments, Mars atmosphere is too thin to support lichen.

      --
      He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
    3. Re:I liken this lichen is alien by nmos · · Score: 1

      hey could also survive on a rusty hull of a space ship,

      Why would there be rust on the hull of a space ship?

    4. Re:I liken this lichen is alien by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, it still might be too thin, but according to this randomly googled site (http://set.lanl.gov/programs/Mars/Atmosphere.htm)

      "The chemical make-up of Mars' atmosphere was measured, on Mars, by the Viking lander spacecraft. The landers analyzed the composition of the atmosphere (mostly of carbon dioxide, with a little nitrogen and argon and other gases), and also the isotopic composition of many elements in the atmosphere."

      Looks like lichen heaven.

  30. In console NetHack... by toeofdestiny · · Score: 1

    the lichen touches you!

  31. Shoving will protect you by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 5, Funny

    So, The Terrible Secret of Space is... athlete's foot? That was sort of anticlimactic.

    --
    Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    1. Re:Shoving will protect you by jtolds · · Score: 1

      If athletes get athelete's foot, what do astronauts get?

      Missle toe.

      I'm sure there's a better way to tie that joke in here, but now I've cleverly ruined all chances of such.

  32. en garde by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Intelligent Designer adherants!

  33. Hmmmf... by Alpha_Traveller · · Score: 2, Funny

    Well it's never going to die if you keep CHECKING ON IT...15 days in space...shesh.

    --
    "Love is like pi - natural, irrational, and very important." (Lisa Hoffman)
  34. Wow by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1

    Astronaut Dave Bowman must be jealous, I'll bet he thought he lasted longer than anybody else that made it into the vacuum of space back in 2001.

    --
    Drill baby drill - on Mars
  35. As a firm ID believer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... er scientist...

    Of COURSE panspermia is possible. Life can easily travel in space. ... if it's supposed to. The whole thing's planned, y'know.

  36. While panspermia is possible... by brian0918 · · Score: 1

    The belief that humans came from somewhere else to this planet, rather than descending from species already on this planet, is too improbable to be true. Species can evolve to physically appear like other species, such as an insect evolving to look like a leaf, but their genetic makeup will not evolve toward that of an entirely different species. The fact that chimpanzee DNA is so similar to humans is incontrovertible proof that the two species descended from a common ancestor.

    (even though physical theories can never be proven, this is as close as one could get to a mathematical proof of 2+2=4, just as is the geologic record's organization of more primitive species at older timescales-- no matter how old people think the Earth and the life on it, you will never find the fossils of a modern species next to those of a very early species.)

    1. Re:While panspermia is possible... by misleb · · Score: 1

      Umm, I don't think the implication is that humans came from another planet (who believes this?), but rather that the common ancestor for all life on Earth could have come from another planet. I imagine it would be all or nothing. Chances of just SOME life on Earth comeing from another planet seems pretty unlikely. I mean, all life on Earth shares similar basic biological mechanisms (DNA)... as well as fitting nicely into a nested hierarchy.

      -matthew

      --
      "THERE IS NO JUSTICE, THERE IS ONLY ME." -Death
    2. Re:While panspermia is possible... by temojen · · Score: 1
      is too improbable to be true.

      No, it's now not too improbable. Just less probable than life originating here. But both theories fit with all currently known observations.

    3. Re:While panspermia is possible... by brian0918 · · Score: 1

      "who believes this?"

      It was argued previously on here that people could have come separately. I was just trying to clear things up before someone tried to make that argument again.

    4. Re:While panspermia is possible... by brian0918 · · Score: 1

      Did you read my post? Panspermia originating all life is find, but panspermia bringing only humans is improbable, and fits no evidence. Rather, all evidence points without a doubt to humans descending from prior life that existed on Earth.

    5. Re:While panspermia is possible... by brian0918 · · Score: 1

      "Panspermia originating all life is find"

      Replace "find" with "fine" for great justice.

    6. Re:While panspermia is possible... by temojen · · Score: 1

      This experiment and the panspermia hypothesis is not about humans coming from outer space.

    7. Re:While panspermia is possible... by brian0918 · · Score: 1

      Read my reply to the other individual.

    8. Re:While panspermia is possible... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no matter how old people think the Earth and the life on it, you will never find the fossils of a modern species next to those of a very early species.

      http://www.omniology.com/A-LittleFish.html

      This is an article about a fish with an early spine that predates invertibrates, never say never. We make new discoveries all the time.

    9. Re:While panspermia is possible... by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      I always thought the theory was that primitive life (aka bacteria) were carried from Mars or elsewhere to earth. Not that humans were brought here from somewhere else and aren't connected to other life on earth.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    10. Re:While panspermia is possible... by brian0918 · · Score: 1

      People really need to read the parent's subject text.

    11. Re:While panspermia is possible... by snake_dad · · Score: 1

      Some people come together, but I doubt that many here have experienced that.

      --
      karma capped .sig seeking available Slashdot poster for long-term relationship.
    12. Re:While panspermia is possible... by vertinox · · Score: 2, Funny

      The fact that chimpanzee DNA is so similar to humans is incontrovertible proof that the two species descended from a common ancestor.

      What if the Aliens did the 'nasty' with the monkies?

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    13. Re:While panspermia is possible... by Jboy_24 · · Score: 1

      My biggest problem with panspermia (esp with regards to earth being seeded from elsewhere), is that it smacks of the same logic of ID. It presumes that abiogenesis is too problematic here on earth and that somehow another planet is more favorable then ours.

      There is no reason to think that any other planet (esp in our Solar System) is somehow more favorable to abiogenesis then the one that currently is the only one known to host life.

    14. Re:While panspermia is possible... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow a reliable source, NOT

      Same site:
      http://www.omniology.com/GLEN-ROSE.html

  37. The thing is hollow... by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...it goes on forever. And...Oh my God!...It's full of lichens!

    --
    No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
  38. Any Lovecraft fan could have told you that. by Vengeance · · Score: 1

    The only question is when the sentient ones will arrive:

    "The things come from another planet, being able to live in interstellar space and fly through it on clumsy, powerful wings which have a way of resisting the aether but which are too poor at steering to be of much use in helping them about on earth. I will tell you about this later if you do not dismiss me at once as a madman. They come here to get metals from mines that go deep under the hills, and I think I know where they come from. They will not hurt us if we let them alone, but no one can say what will happen if we get too curious about them. Of course a good army of men could wipe out their mining colony. That is what they are afraid of. But if that happened, more would come from outside - any number of them. They could easily conquer the earth, but have not tried so far because they have not needed to. They would rather leave things as they are to save bother."

    --
    It was a joke! When you give me that look it was a joke.
  39. ice pirates by steelem · · Score: 1

    Space Herpes!

  40. Re:Etymology of "panspermia" ... aren't YOU curiou by ndansmith · · Score: 2, Informative

    Indeed, the Greek adjectives allos or allotrios ("another" and "alien; foreign" respectively) may serve better in this place. Perhaps the meaning has changed due to the context of the conversation. The theory of "panspermia" would deal with how all life was "seeded." An extraterrestrial source is an option of "panspermia" I suppose.

  41. Hmmm.... Space herpes! by poopie · · Score: 2, Funny

    What the hell was that? Hmmm... space herpes!
    ... This ship has space herpes?

  42. Conditions they forgot by RealProgrammer · · Score: 2, Funny

    - Reentry heat (need to be inside a big rock or something)

    - Boredom. Lichens are fairly uncontemplative creatures, however.

    --
    sigs, as if you care.
    1. Re:Conditions they forgot by Tackhead · · Score: 2, Funny
      > - Reentry heat (need to be inside a big rock or something)
      > - Boredom. Lichens are fairly uncontemplative creatures, however.

      Bored lichens. On fire.

      Dude, the Star Wars Galaxies thread is this way, bud!

  43. Not in space. by pavon · · Score: 1

    AFAIK, the MIR mold was only growing inside the space station. In other words it had a nice atmospherically controlled environment practically identical to the environment that it evolved in. The only oddity that it had to deal with was lack of gravity.

    This is much different as the lichen had to survive the vacuum of space, including direct solar radiation and dramatic temperature variations that come with it.

    1. Re:Not in space. by plover · · Score: 1
      I'm assuming the MIR astronauts could have suited up and opened the doors to let some "fresh vacuum in" (yes, it's a joke), much the same way we earthbound people open the windows if the dog poops on the carpet. But I'm betting that wouldn't have worked.

      The techniques that we'd normally use to sterilize mold on earth would include flame and chemicals. Fire in a spacecraft is generally a really bad idea. It would have been especially bad considering some of the mold was growing on electrical wire insulation, which was probably not designed for direct exposure to flame. And any chemical used, such as bleach, would have made the compartment atmosphere toxic and might not have been scrubbable by the filters. The chlorine probably would have damaged the filters (although they probably could have designed extra 'bleach filters' to use for the duration of the cleaning process.)

      I think the Russians tried everything they could afford to to eradicate the mold. In space vacuum and cold are both cheap and plentiful; so if that even had a remote chance to kill the mold don't you think they'd have tried it?

      --
      John
    2. Re:Not in space. by VATechTigger · · Score: 0

      havent you seen The Blob?

  44. Chicken and egg thing again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Problem with panspermia is that it shifts the explanation of how life emerged. Where'd it come from? Some other planet. How'd it get on that other planet? Duh, i dunno... intelligent design or something.

  45. Alien weapon systems by The+Infamous+TommyD · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Didn't you see the amount of rock shooting off into space after the Death Star blew up Alderaan? Let's not forget all of the test shots they would have done before that.

    Also, we can't forget that it could have been on pieces of the ringworld from Halo.

  46. Lightweight idea by amightywind · · Score: 1

    The experiment adds weight to the theory of panspermia - that life could somehow be transported between planets.

    Given that the panspermia theory has the weight of a neutrino, that isn't very much. Organisms in small asteroids would be incinerated in earth's atmosphere. Bugs ridding larger ones would have to survive awesome shock forces and intense kinetic heating. Earth is such an ideal organic molecular playground it doesn't seem necessary to invoke some outside agent, like Mars. I think Occam's Razor applies here. I do not doubt that meteor and cometary infall were sources of lots of organic material during the period of heavy bombardment, and that they enhanced conditions for the formation of life.

    --
    an ill wind that blows no good
    1. Re:Lightweight idea by flyinwhitey · · Score: 5, Informative

      "Organisms in small asteroids would be incinerated in earth's atmosphere"

      No, you're wrong.

      "As it falls through 80 km, it loses 3 to 6 mm of surface mass per second through ablation. The melted material and metal, heated to over 1800 C, is being swept away from the meteoroid, carrying away the accumulating surface heat so efficiently that the interior remains cool."

      That was from meteorlab.com. Look it up so that next time you won't be spreading incorrect information.

      --
      How pathetic are you that you follow me from topic to topic and waste all your mod points at once modding me down?
    2. Re:Lightweight idea by JhohannaVH · · Score: 1

      I don't know man... I sure found this article awful interesting, and beats every one of your death by bungy bungy theories: http://www.sciam.com/print_version.cfm?articleID=0 0073A97-5745-1359-94FF83414B7F0000

      Jho

      --
      Sorry man... the Internet pooped on me.
    3. Re:Lightweight idea by amightywind · · Score: 1

      You're right. It depends on size. I guess it doesn't hurt to look in meteorites for microbes.

      --
      an ill wind that blows no good
  47. No, sorry... by millennial · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The experiment adds weight to the theory of panspermia - that life could somehow be transported between planets.

    I'll believe that as soon as they finish the experiments that show lichen's ability to survive entry into the atmosphere.

    --
    I am scientifically inaccurate.
    1. Re:No, sorry... by Idarubicin · · Score: 1
      I'll believe that as soon as they finish the experiments that show lichen's ability to survive entry into the atmosphere.

      That one's pretty easy. If the lichen is in a moderately deep crack in the rock it's riding on then the lichen should stay pretty cool during reentry. Only the outermost layers of the meteorite will experience much heating; rock is a pretty good insulator. The shock wave that forms in front of and around a big blunt object entering the atmosphere will also provide some protection. I would characterize atmospheric reentry as a relatively inefficient and unreliable sterilization method.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    2. Re:No, sorry... by millennial · · Score: 1

      It would have to be a pretty large rock. After all, meteors the size of houses often break up into fist-sized chunks on re-entry.

      Besides, I wasn't only thinking of heat. There's immense amounts of friction involved, too. When meteors break apart, there's enough friction between them and the atmosphere that they skip across thin air, like a rock on a pond. The lichen would have to survive this friction, combined with the heat and immense forces of deceleration.

      Plus, if this stuff only survived 15 days, it's hard to believe that something like this could make the trip from one planet to another.

      --
      I am scientifically inaccurate.
  48. Have the also been able to survive reentry? by PierceLabs · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Because clearly having it survive in space is not in itself enough for life to migrate from planet to planet. Somehow it must survive reentry or else its a moot point.

    1. Re:Have the also been able to survive reentry? by Itanshi · · Score: 1

      of course you are assuming there is an atmosphere on the planet to burn it at the time...

    2. Re:Have the also been able to survive reentry? by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 1

      He's also assuming that this form of primitive life cannot survive a high G-force impact, being protected deep within the asteroid/comet/etc.

  49. Re:Obligatory - short story recap by citabjockey · · Score: 1

    I recall reading a short about a future government's determination to stop an experiment in artificial life. The experiment was taking place between the orbits of mars and Jupiter. When the decision was made to end it due to perceived danger to life on earth, the selected strategy was to toss the colony into the Sun.

    Of course, as the asteroid containing the engineered fungii passed the orbit of earth it managed to escape out of its enclosure in the asteroid -- as spores. These then were pushed back towards earth by the solar wind.

    Fun Stuff!

    Survival of the fittest -- and I can't believe that is us.

  50. If we launch these to Mars now... by Orrin+Bloquy · · Score: 0

    ...can we expect Martians to come up with something better than "Day of the Triffids"?

    --
    "Made up/misattributed quote that makes me look smart. I am on /. and I must look smart."
  51. Silly person. by Auraiken · · Score: 1

    Slashdotters don't shower :) ...much

  52. are lichens more complex than water bears??? by Hoohoodilly · · Score: 0
  53. I don't get panspermia by Astronomypete · · Score: 0, Interesting

    Someone please help me with this theory.

    If life came to this planet, from another planet, where did the life come from?
    How was life created on another planet?

    Forget the question whether it could survive in space.

    Answer the question how was life created.

    Answers on a postcard please.

    ---
    Troll On!

    --
    Better is the enemy of good enough. - Russian proverb.
  54. Beyond The Mind's Eye by lullabud · · Score: 1

    This made me think of that chapter in "Beyond the Mind's Eye" where the plants shoot their seeds from one planet to another. What a kick ass set of movies Miramar did, The Mind's Eye series.

  55. Sorry to poop on your theroy but.... by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    Considering that most planetary bodies are sepreated by vaste expanses of space, the odds that some bits of lichen are gonna live through the trip are remote. For example, if one was a nutjob that say believed that space lichen came from an ancient civilization on Mars and landed on Earth to create life... Well considering that Mars is about 225 million km (on average) away from Earth and that space lichen has a "floating through space" shelf life of 15 days.... which is 360 hours... carry the one.... Sooooo that bit of lichen would have to be shot off Mars at about 625,000 km per hour. Never mind this doesn't factor in how to avoid being vaporized by Earth's atmosphere, by being a little piece of lichen going 625,000 km per hour. Thats some pretty fast and tough lichen we are talking here. Of course it *IS* Mars lichen, which may be some sort of super lichen, but then explain why we don't have super lichen on Earth? Can't can you?

    In conclusion Apple Tarts are crispy and sweet.

    1. Re:Sorry to poop on your theroy but.... by smeenz · · Score: 1

      They said they exposed it to space for 2 weeks and it survived. They didn't say that it died after being exposed for two weeks. Very different things. Potentially, it could have survived for months or even years, but they stopped the experiment too early to be able to determine that.

    2. Re:Sorry to poop on your theroy but.... by DarthVain · · Score: 1

      Good point, I guess I should rtfa and not just the headlines.... :) Certainly makse my post less funny anyway...

    3. Re:Sorry to poop on your theroy but.... by smeenz · · Score: 1

      hehe.. now now, we wouldn't want to start a wild new trend on slashdot by having people actually RTFA :)

  56. Re:Etymology of "panspermia" ... aren't YOU curiou by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's not its etymology, that's merely what the original meaning for the word components were. The etymology of the word would include its development to its present form.

  57. sugar mines... by fuck_this_shit · · Score: 1

    I for one welcome our outerspace lichen overlords and hold no resentment against their interplanetary bukkake bombardment.

  58. Eww. by pavon · · Score: 2, Funny

    I don't want to know what kind of flute that goat-man is playing.

    1. Re:Eww. by fbjon · · Score: 1

      The goat-man? Organ pipe.

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
  59. erm by Auraiken · · Score: 1

    wondering how this got posted under the comment below the one i clicked 0_o

  60. I had this friend by pavon · · Score: 1

    who didn't shower enough and lichen started growing on his scalp. It like totally took over his brain. Now he has to deal with the ethical dilemas of being sued for trespassing on a rock for thousands of years even though only part of him is guilty.

  61. Accountants and Hairdressers by Zerbs · · Score: 1

    Of course human life didn't evolve on this planet. A spaceship full of accountants and hairdressers crashed onto this planet. They are our ancestors, not the apes.

    --
    "22 astronauts were born in Ohio. What is it about your state that makes people want to flee the Earth?" Stephen Colbert
  62. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  63. In other news... by Withen · · Score: 1

    ... the astronauts who conducted the experiment were found emitting an inhuman scream and pointing at others...

  64. Actually, they did let some vacuum in once by hpulley · · Score: 1

    Remember when the cargo ship crashed into Mir, causing partial depressurization they even considered fixing? Michael Foale certainly remembers. Any mold still growing in the Spektr module would have been exposed to vacuum and maybe even some UV if the ruptures were large enough.

    --
    $#!^ happens, but why does it always have to happen to me???
    1. Re:Actually, they did let some vacuum in once by EwokMolester · · Score: 0

      Er, I think you mean they let air out once, as technically a vacuum is nothing?

      Or is it? How can the vacuum of space have a temperature of more than 0 Kelvin?

      All my points if you can answer that guys.

  65. You want to see if... by sczimme · · Score: 2, Informative


    Now that we know lichens can survive exposed to the harsh conditions of space, how about we try it with Karl Rove?

    You want to see if the lichens can survive exposed to the harsh conditions of Karl Rove? That's just mean... to the lichens.

    PS Eeewwww.

    --
    I want to drag this out as long as possible. Bring me my protractor.
  66. What's the big deal by Darius+Jedburgh · · Score: 3, Funny

    My biology teacher told me that life was designed by an intelligent designer who can do anything. If he wanted lichen to sprout rocket engines and fly between the stars he could do that too. That's why science is a pointless subject to study and I'll just get back to my cow tipping here in Kansas...

  67. RE: Why would there be rust on the hull of a ship? by digitaldc · · Score: 1

    Because they ran out of titanium?

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
  68. Ethics?! by bullitB · · Score: 1

    Seriously, folks, did these "researchers" even run this study by an animal welfare group before conducting this cruel experiment? How are we to know if that algae was suffering while in the vaccuum of space? "Expose creature to something and see if it dies" is not a good formula for ethical science.

    I mean, what's next? Are we going to try putting humans in space too? See how long they last?

  69. And this is supposed to be new??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hasn't anybody hear of Victor Carroon?

  70. So we are all realted.. by thecpuguru · · Score: 1

    So we are all related to some space Lichens that came from Mars? I think NOT!

  71. Blistering Barnacles... by HermanAB · · Score: 2, Funny

    Oh, great - so my space ship will need anti-fouling to keep space barnacles from growing on it...

    Will space barnacles and space weed slow a space ship down? Maybe if it gets stuck in the subspace propeller, or fouls the plasma intake manifold...

    --
    Oh well, what the hell...
  72. Info from the ESA site by YA_Python_dev · · Score: 1
    Was this a mission to the ISS?

    No, it wasn't: it was an unmanned spacecraft.

    More info from ESA.

    --
    There's a hidden treasure in Python 3.x: __prepare__()
  73. Microscopic image of the lichen after the flight by YA_Python_dev · · Score: 2, Informative

    Electron microscopic image of the lichen after the flight.

    --
    There's a hidden treasure in Python 3.x: __prepare__()
  74. Two weeks is nothing by pz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Terrestrial bacteria were found to have survived for three years of lunar exposure. Apollo 12 Commander Pete Conrad who retrieved the camera from which these bacteria were cultured thinks this discovery is the, "most significant thing that we ever found," in the entire Apollo program.

    http://science.nasa.gov/newhome/headlines/ast01sep 98_1.htm

    --

    Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
    1. Re:Two weeks is nothing by J05H · · Score: 1

      The Ranger camera was a very significant find during Apollo. I actually think this has bigger implications, for one simple reason: lichen are far more complex than simple bacteria.

      Josh

      --
      gigantino.tv - Heavy but weighs nothing.
  75. But did they grow? by SheeEttin · · Score: 1

    From an earlier post:
    "Lichens grow in the leftover spots of the natural world that are too harsh or limited for most other organisms. They are pioneers on bare rock, desert sand, cleared soil, dead wood, animal bones, rusty metal, and living bark. Able to shut down metabolically during periods of unfavorable conditions, they can survive extremes of heat, cold, and drought."

    So, they weren't doing any living in space? My guess is they stopped their metabolism and ceased liven for a while. If they weren't active or anything, why do we care? Even if we did send lichens to other planets on big rocks, the rocks would be desrtoyed on impact, incinerating the lichens.

  76. RTFA by Hlewagastir · · Score: 1

    The lichen survived for fifteen days in space, were returned to Earth, and resumed thriving after undergoing a dormant period while exposed to space. This means that the lichen can survive for _at least_ 15 days, it is entirely possible that they can survive much longer but that was outside of the scope of this experiment. Don't be too quick to assume that the scientists running the experiment are so much more obtuse than you apparently consider yourself to be.

  77. panspermia my rearend by cinnamon+colbert · · Score: 1

    the lichens lasted two weeks
    assuming you could actually get to 10% of c, it would take 40 years from the nearest star....seems like a bit if problem, but who knows
    40 years * 52 weeks = ~ 2,000 weeks

  78. Lichen by n54 · · Score: 1

    From within Nethack (http://nethack.org/):

    Pick an object.
    F a fungus or mold (lichen)

    From the Jubilex monster manual (http://www.juiblex.co.uk/nethack/VernonSpoilers/M onsterManual/lichen.html#lichen):

    Name: lichen
    Difficulty: 1
    Base level: 0
    Base experience: 4
    Speed: 1
    Base AC: 9
    Base MR: 0
    Alignment: 0
    Frequency: Uncommon
    Genocidable: Yes
    ATTACK:
            Sticks to you
    Weight: 20
    Nutritional value: 200
    Size: small
    Resistances: None
    Resistances conveyed by eating: None

    Due to its unusual body chemistry, A lichen has no need to breathe. It has no eyes, and is therefore impervious to gaze and blindness attacks. It has no mind, and is therefore not detectable via telepathy. It has no limbs and no head. A lichen cannot pick up objects.

    The chamber was of unhewn rock, round, as near as might be, eighteen or twenty feet across, and gay with rich variety of fern and moss and lichen. The fern was in its winter still, or coiling for the spring-tide; but moss was in abundant life, some feathering, and some gobleted, and some with fringe of red to it.
    Lorna Doone, by R.D. Blackmore

    At Dict.org:
    http://www.dict.org/bin/Dict?Form=Dict1&Strategy=* &Database=*&Query=lichen

    --
    this comment is provided "as is" and without any express or implied legibility or congruity [...]
  79. Solves nothing by Peeptophe · · Score: 1

    Scientists as of late have been focusing (more than usual) on panspermia as an explanation for life on Earth.

    What few of them neglect to realize is that life still had to start someplace. All the facts point to it starting here, on Earth. Life on Earth is unlikely to have been seeded from elsewhere. It most likely began here.

    Panspermia seems to be the "solve-all" when we can't explain the exact details of how life started. The problem is that it still leaves us with needing to explain how it started elsewhere...on another planet with an environment we know nothing about.

    Life began and evolved here, on Earth.

    Another issue is that two-weeks isn't long enough to get anywhere in our solar system. I'd like to see just how long the lichens would last. 9 months to Mars, 5 months to Venus. It's likely there is nothing living on either of those planets and it's light years to anything that might support life.

    Lastly, we still have the issue with re-entry.

    --
    * Si hoc legere scis numium eruditionis habes *
  80. Solution: A gun with nearly unlimited ammo. by Hlewagastir · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I would hazard to guess the odds of ejecta striking another planet at much worse than 1:1,000,000. Be that as it may, if I were given a gun that could shoot 1 billion bullets in the stadium, and I fired those bullets randomly while blindfolded, I would be very surprised Not to have hit the target a few decades later when I expended all of my bullets. Just the same with the example of a planet ejecting material over the millenia. It is highly unlikely for any one rock to hit anything, however the odds of one out of an astronomical number of rocks to hit another planet becomes significantly more plausible.

  81. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  82. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  83. Hitch-hiker's guide to the Solar System by Stephen+Samuel · · Score: 2, Funny

    Some forms of lichen can be used as a towel in an emergency.

    --
    Free Software: Like love, it grows best when given away.
  84. conspiracy by corpsiclex · · Score: 1

    1. Set free space-resistant lichen on uninhabited nearby planet. 2. Wait several million years. 2. Return, explain the situation, and be worshipped as gods! 3. Profit! oh shit...has this been done before??

    --

    eBayDig 1s a typo saerch engien
  85. You've been slimed by n54 · · Score: 1

    Cool link you gave there, green slime is also a fairly wellknown/famous creature in in Nethack. I wonder if there might be a connection between the two?

    From the Juiblex monster manual (http://www.juiblex.co.uk/nethack/VernonSpoilers/M onsterManual/AMOEBOID.html#green_slime):

    Name: green slime
    Difficulty: 8
    Base level: 6
    Base experience: 164
    Speed: 6
    Base AC: 6
    Base MR: 0
    Alignment: 0
    Frequency: Very rare, only in Gehennom
    Genocidable: Yes
    ATTACK:
            Touch: Turns you into green slime
    Weight: 400
    Nutritional value: 150
    Size: large
    Resistances: cold, electricity, poison, acid, petrification
    Resistances conveyed by eating: None

    A green slime can flow under doors. Due to its unusual body chemistry, It has no need to breathe. It has no eyes, and is therefore impervious to gaze and blindness attacks. It has no mind, and is therefore not detectable via telepathy. A green slime has no limbs and no head. It is acidic and poisonous if eaten. It is an omnivore.

    From the steelypips instadeath spoiler (http://www.steelypips.org/nethack/instadeath.html #slime):

    sliming

    Green slimes (generally not seen outside certain parts of Gehennom) can slime you with their 'touch' attack. If you're slimed, you will slowly turn into another green slime over the course of several turns.

    Preventatives: Always kill green slimes from a distance. Don't let them get close to attack you. (This implies that you should have some way to spot them from a distance) An amulet of unchanging will protect you from being slimed.

    Remedies: If you get yourself slimed, you can pray to your god for help, if they're happy with you. Don't pray to your god, though, if you're beneath the Valley of the Dead (Vlad's tower doesn't count as being beneath the Valley of the Dead) or they'll become angry with you, so if you're beneath the Valley of the Dead, you'll need to teleport out of Gehennom in order for your deity to heal you. Additionally, putting on an amulet of unchanging will halt the sliming process. Reading a scroll of fire, casting 'Fireball' on yourself, zapping a wand of fire at yourself, stepping on a fire trap, lighting a potion of oil and throwing it upwards, and other methods of setting oneself on fire will burn the slime away (but will also hurt you and probably destroy many carried scrolls and potions at the same time). Casting 'Cure Sickness' on yourself or #invoking the Staff of Aesculapius will heal sliming more safely. Additionally, polymorphing yourself will heal you of sliming. Applying a unicorn horn will NOT stop sliming!

    --
    this comment is provided "as is" and without any express or implied legibility or congruity [...]
  86. panspermia, evolution by J05H · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Lichen are tough. We all knew that. What we didn't know was how tough - this is incredible news. 15 days exposed in LEO and the samples were still viable? That indicates, to me, that lichen not only "happen" to be able to survive in space, but that the base organism evolved in space and transported to Earth continually until conditions allowed it to survive here. The description of lichen as protected by minerals in exo would indicate that they are capable of forming protected mats and still photosynthesize. The abstract didn't cover it all, did the lichen hibernate or photosynthesize? I'm not sure, but the basic survival fact is huge evidence in support of panspermia, universal left-handed chirality and biology as a basic element of the universe.

    Photos from Mars show patches of greenish-brown and blue-green on rocks, cliffs and in low-lying (higher pressure) regions. The Deep Impact mission showed almost 1/3rd the mass of the comet as carbonaceous material, the researchers claim it is prebiotic. Photos from both Viking I (Gil Levin photo) and both MER rovers show "fuzzy" greenish rocks and fine filamented structures. If lichen survive in open space, they would be that much more at home in a fluffy growing medium that contains lots of water, and with a few archaea in the mix would produce exactly the compounds found in comet Tempel 1.

    I've always agreed with the tenets of panspermia, the last few months of space science has convinced me. There is life out there, and a lot of it.

    Josh

    Fun note: the craft that flew the BIOPAN experiment is a Foton capsule, a direct decendant of the capsule Yuri Gagarin flew in. It is a round metal ball with a donut of equipment on the back and some antennae, same layout with somewhat newer gear.

    --
    gigantino.tv - Heavy but weighs nothing.
    1. Re:panspermia, evolution by Ed+Avis · · Score: 1

      I thought lichens were rather delicate lifeforms, in particular being very sensitive to air pollution. So the number of different kinds of lichen growing on your wall tells you how clean the air is.

      --
      -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    2. Re:panspermia, evolution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How dare slashdotters ridicule intelligent design! Honestly, a patch of lichen holds its breath for 2 weeks, and its proof that life came from space. Well, the scientologists are convinced. Why are the self described defenders of science attacking this?

      Why do the majority of Americans prefer creationism to evolution? Its because of the kind of people attacking creationism. Hypocrites who attack others just because they believe in a different set of fantasies than they do. With no more proof than a fundementalist has for Genesis, they worship at the alter of L. Ron Hubbard, but call it science. There is no evidence for panspermia! Panspermia is science fiction - fiction!

    3. Re:panspermia, evolution by corblix · · Score: 2, Interesting
      15 days exposed in LEO and the samples were still viable? That indicates, to me, that lichen not only "happen" to be able to survive in space, but that the base organism evolved in space and transported to Earth continually until conditions allowed it to survive here.

      Maybe. The problem is the evidence works both ways. In particular, this space-based lichen also has the ability to survive, long-term, in a nitrogen/oxygen atmosphere, at temperatures a bit above the freezing point of water. In fact, it actually does better in such an environment than in its native vacuum environment. So maybe the real truth is that it actually evolved in such an environment, and not in a vacuum.

      I'm not trying to belittle your ideas here. I'm just saying that the place where an organism survives best is a good bet to be its native environment. And vacuum doesn't fit the bill for lichen.

      On the other hand, it is possible that what we have here is an organism that mostly hangs out on planetary surfaces, in an atmosphere, and occasionally makes successful trips through vacuum. But such trips would necessarily be very long: years (at least) within the Solar System, millennia between stars. So the real question is whether lichen (or whatever) can be freeze dried for a while and then brought back to life by the presence of a favorable environment. The next experiment they need to do is to stick some lichen out in space for a year or so, then dump it in a nice tropical environment and see what happens.

    4. Re:panspermia, evolution by J05H · · Score: 1

      >Maybe. The problem is the evidence works both ways.

      I agree that it is not solved, but is the beginning of new possibilities. I'm not arguing for free-floating lichen, but for lichen being carried throughout the universe inside comets. We don't know if they thrive in that environment, but they would apparently survive. Yes, lichen definitely thrive in Earth's environment. Some of my post was wild conjecture, for sure, I'm fascinated with this subject.

      >I'm not trying to belittle your ideas here. I'm just saying that the place where an organism
      >survives best is a good bet to be its native environment. And vacuum doesn't fit the bill for lichen.

      Belittling is what Slashdot is for! 8) I wouldn't guess that lichen evolved in space, but on some distant world. I don't discount some Archaea and maybe cyanobacteria as free-space microbes (there has been some research), but lichens could be life that clings in all sorts of solar systems - on planets, in asteroids and comets. One mechanism for in-space living (verses stasis) would be if the outer layers of the lichen are enough to protect the colony while allowing sunlight to feed it. For a critter that can surive open space indefinitely, check out Deinnocochus Radiodurans. It's so radiation resistant that Russian biologists seriously claim it is from Mars.

      >On the other hand, it is possible that what we have here is an organism that mostly hangs out on
      >planetary surfaces, in an atmosphere, and occasionally makes successful trips through vacuum. But
      >such trips would necessarily be very long: years (at least) within the Solar System, millennia
      >between stars. So the real question is whether lichen (or whatever) can be freeze dried for a while
      >and then brought back to life by the presence of a favorable environment. The next experiment they
      >need to do is to stick some lichen out in space for a year or so, then dump it in a nice tropical
      >environment and see what happens.

      We already know that bacteria can be revived successfully after millions of years in amber. The panspermia.org website suggests bacteria in shut-down stasis are essentially immortal (barring catastrophics). Lichen also has lower/no metabolism states. Trips through the solar system are definitely doable (local panspermia), trips throughout the Milky Way galaxy are possible and galaxies collide (strong panspermia). I'm all for further astrobiology experiments, including long-duration exposures. I'm also for seeding the planets with new critters, just in case nature missed any potential ecosystems.

      I can't bring myself to reply to the ACs following my post, so... Inside a comet there are all sorts of complex carbon molecules, PAHs and sugars, acetates, formaldehyde, methane, ammonia. These combined with some extremophile bacteria could easily feed CO2 to cometary lichen colonies.

      Josh

      --
      gigantino.tv - Heavy but weighs nothing.
    5. Re:panspermia, evolution by MadMoses · · Score: 0

      I, for one, welcome our space lichen overlords!

      --

      Do not be alarmed. This is only a test.
  87. This proves Intelligent Design by Subrafta · · Score: 3, Funny
    The experiment adds weight to the theory of panspermia - that life could somehow be transported between planets.

    Only an intelligent designer could have calculated the trajectories and orbits necessary to spread life between planets. Especially given the limited computers available at the time of creation.

    --
    Vuja De: That sinking feeling that this is going to happen again. Often occurs in meetings with Product Managers.
    1. Re:This proves Intelligent Design by sbsaylors · · Score: 1

      I cant believe this didnt get a bigger "funny" score... come on Especially given the limited computers available at the time of creation.

  88. It's elephants all the way down. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We also have the problem of entry. For a rock to be knocked off a planet, and out of its orbit, it has to be subjected to tremendous energy - which translates into tremendous heat.

    Another problem with panspermia is the impropability - a planet evovled life within a narrow set of specifications - chemistry, temperature, radiation levels. A peice is knocked off with a life form robust enough to survive the violent ejection into space, the millenia of cold, vacuum, and radiation. It then has to survive the thermal and mechanical shock of reentry. Then, the new planet has to have similar charecteristics to the original - chemistry, temperature, radiation levels. How anyone can riducule intelligent design while indulging in fantasies like this is beyond belief.

    Apparently, there aren't many real biologists here, so the volcanic-vent-living bacteria is taken as proof of something it's not. what it proves is that life in hospitable environments can GRADUALLY adapt to hostile environments. It does not mean that life can originate in hostile environments, or that life thrust into hostile environments can spontaneously adapt.

    Panspermia is like the old lady who tells the astronomer that he's got it all wrong: the world rests on the back of a giant elephant. He patiently explains that that doesn't solve anything - what does the elephant stand on. Triumphantly she exclaims - "You can't catch me up, it's elephants all the way down".

  89. life, on other planets, that came from Earth by FlippyTheSkillsaw · · Score: 1

    Well, duh!

    We still have the same problem, though. Where are they going to find water?

    The first thing you're going to have to find to have Earth organisms on another planet will be a bacteria (or complex of them) that can produce water. There is plenty of material in just about any rock to make water(H2O), but it would take a lot of energy. On the other hand, the sun provides a lot of energy.

  90. Intelligent Design by scottennis · · Score: 2

    So, God created life on another planet and then had to blast it to Earth on an asteroid or comet????

    I'm so confused!

  91. Be a man... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...and go for bull tipping :)

  92. Mars is butt cold by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They would liken this atmosphere? :) It still may be too cold, its something like -260 degrees at night on Mars.

  93. errrr... by Now.Imperfect · · Score: 0

    So somehow life traveled through the continuum of space in 15 days? =P

  94. a bit more study and it could be usefull by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the lichen was found to be resistant to cosmic rays. if this resistance is by way of reflection or absorbtion it might be used as a skin on space capsuls to protect the human cargo inside.

    alternativly, it can be used as a replacement for a tinfoil hat

  95. Dolphins! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    What about dolphins. They can hold their breath for a real long time. Probably could do it in space too! We should really start releasing dolphins into space to see how long they can survive, because maybe they evolved on another planet which got destroyed - but they traveled to our planet through space. Maybe.

  96. Personally... by anandamide · · Score: 1

    ...I welcome our new Space Lichen Overlords!

  97. NetHack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The lichen touches you! The lichen hits! You die.

    Do you want your possessions identified?

  98. photosynthesis? in a vacuum? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Photosynthesis?

    Doesn't that require a carbon source (CO2) as well as an energy source?

    I don't see how the lichen could photosynthesize in a vacuum. Unless you're suggesting they created their own pressurized capsule.

  99. Panspermia Makes Evolution Much Less Likely by billstewart · · Score: 2, Interesting
    There are really three different cases for PanSpermia - Interplanetary, Interstellar Accidental, and Friendly Space Aliens. The Scientific American article and the Space Lichens experiment are exploring the possibility that carbon-based lifeforms or at least useful pre-life chemicals could have been transported between planets, at least from Mars to Earth, and while that possibility would be necessary for Interstellar Panspermia to work, it's not sufficient - surviving on a trip from Mars to Earth is much less strenuous than surviving a trip of tens or hundreds of light-years, and the probability that there are enough partially-evolved planets blowing up and splattering their Precious Bodily Fluids around that significant quantities of hit hit the Earth at a time that Earth was chemically ready to accept it sound highly unlikely.

    The standard evolutionary model says that Earth had a bunch of Primordial Soup that cooked for hundreds of millions of years until some of it did stuff that was interesting enough to photosynthesize, which started radically changing the chemistry of the planet's atmosphere and the Soup until more of it started doing more interesting stuff and eventually it was interesting enough that we can declare that "It's Alive!" The probability that stars will have planets, and that they'll have the right conditions to let this happen (temperature, available atomic mixtures, gravity, etc.) are pretty low, and people who like to speculate about how heavily populated the universe is and when we'll find aliens come up with estimates like Drake's Equation to try to guess how rare we are.

    Interplanetary Panspermia suggests that not only did Earth have to have the right mixture of chemicals and temperature/pressure conditions in the Primordial Soup for all this to happen, but that Mars or maybe Venus also had to have a (presumably different) batch of soup cooking that had either become Alive or else pretty close, and something had to cause a Big Splash to get some Martian Soup mixed in with the Earth Soup at a time that both of them were in the right conditions. If the Earth had been running too far ahead or behind in time, or the Big Splash hadn't happened at the right time or hadn't been big enough, then the Martians would have been told No Soup For You, Next Billion Years , Earth wouldn't have been alive, and Mars would have done the Cosmic Wimpout without us evolving to see it today. Drake's Equation looks much more dodgy under those assumptions. If that's what it takes for life to evolve, I don't expect any space aliens to show up any time soon.

    Interplanetary Panspermia doesn't really solve any problems about how life could have evolved, though I suppose it *could* have happened, but it seems much less likely than Earth's Primordial Soup doing the job on its own. Interstellar Panspermia seems much much less likely to me, for reasons I noted above. There's a huge amount of stellar evolution that had to happen just to get the right elements into the Solar System, since some of them only get formed inside supernovae or similar stars. Friendly Space Aliens deliberately seeding the place begs the question of how *they* evolved, but strikes me as no less likely than Interstellar Panspermia happening by accident. You'd think they'd have also left a message, but maybe they were just shooting stuff out at likely stars on spec, hoping that something would work even if they weren't around four billion years later when we were ready to Phone Home, or maybe they really *are* hanging around on the Dark Side of the Moon working on the next chapter of their cookbook before they drop in for a visit.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    1. Re:Panspermia Makes Evolution Much Less Likely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. That's a great summary. I would only elaborate a little more, in that when you look at earth's distance from the sun, its magnetosphere, tectonic activity, incredibly large moon, circularity of orbit, neighboring gas giants to herd asteroids away, relatively stable parent star, water content, and salinity of oceans, it's difficult to imagine a place more hospitible for life. So why move the origination point somewhere else?

      I would also like to reiterate that, knowing what we know from just the last 20 years of microbiological discovery, it's a logical non-sequiter to think even a simple reproducing cell could have just appeared from a primordial soup. And yes, that debate can be had on scientific, not religious, grounds.

  100. Yey! Conclusive research by tod_miller · · Score: 1

    I love how they then threw the blobs at earth, and let them cook through the atmosphere, and land in a martian like (non life) environment.

    In a humans mind, they imagine life being started by a ball of lovely alive things, floating to the surface which is already teeming with an alive ecosystem, nitrogen cycle, water, o2 and co2.

    People are so blinkered. Anything from 'FAR FAR AWAY' must be true, for any sufficiently large value of FAR or AWAY (on in some cases 'LONG TIME AGO').

    ooooh scarey unimaginable things from space!!! wooooo woooo woooooohohohoowowowowowow fucking hypocritical darwinist bastard monkeys.

    --
    #hostfile 0.0.0.0 primidi.com 0.0.0.0 www.primidi.com 0.0.0.0 radio.weblogs.com
    1. Re:Yey! Conclusive research by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You obviously don't understand either the science involved in meteorite landings nor the hypothesis of panspermia. Go crawl back under your troll-rock, Kansan.

  101. ring world is not from halo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    why dont you read more books, you might like some of the sci fi written in the last hundred years, say like, "Ringworld"?!!!1111