Slashdot Mirror


Nissan and Microsoft Create Videogame Car

pnewhook writes "The Register reports that Microsoft and Nissan have created the first integrated gaming system within a vehicle. Not just in the vehicle, but the vehicle becomes part of the gaming system. From the article: "Conceived by Nissan Design America Inc. (NDA) and equipped with the Xbox 360 next-generation video game and entertainment system from Microsoft, the Nissan URGE concept car allows drivers (while parked) to play 'Project Gotham Racing 3' using the car's own steering wheel, gas pedal and brake pedal while viewing the game on a flip-down seven-inch LCD screen," Nissan and Microsoft said in a statement."

254 comments

  1. Been there, done that, this worries me! by dada21 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I probably shouldn't admit this. In my 1999 Subaru RS (now long sold, unfortunately, it was my favorite car) I had a Pioneer flip-out LCD screen (about 7" widescreen format). I modified a Sega Dreamcast to run off 12V DC (no inverter), and I made a Dreamcast controller port above the steering column.

    I never played while driving, err, never much, that is. It wasn't hard to avoid the "no screen while driving" safety feature. My girlfriend (who later I married) forced me to rip it out, as I had always tempted fate. Hey, I was only 25 years old!

    To get to the topic, I'm not sure how much I trust any safety features they might embed in the car to prevent someone from finding a really wide open piece of tarmac and actually playing while driving. In fact, I don't even trust MYSELF to try it. How much is the car, again?

    By the way, it was really awesome driving an RS while playing as an older WRX on the mini screen. I never caused an accident, but I did get a lot of honked horns. And they say men are safer drivers over once they hit 25?

    1. Re:Been there, done that, this worries me! by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 4, Informative

      To get to the topic, I'm not sure how much I trust any safety features they might embed in the car to prevent someone from finding a really wide open piece of tarmac and actually playing while driving.

      The safety feature is that this is a drive-by-wire system, there are no controller ports, and the steering wheel and stuff either controls the car (if it's on) or the game (if the car's off). It can't control two things at once. If you're controlling the car, there isn't a controller for the video game - and if you're controlling the video game, the gear's in park, the engine's off, and the parking brake is set.

      The only way you might be able to play while the car was in motion is if someone was pushing the car from behind.

    2. Re:Been there, done that, this worries me! by brain+defrag · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How long before someone finds a way around that?

    3. Re:Been there, done that, this worries me! by BMIComp · · Score: 1

      No system is infallible....

    4. Re:Been there, done that, this worries me! by biocute · · Score: 1

      It probably won't take long but both Nissan and Microsoft will be few layers away from potential law suits. Insurance company will like that too because they usually don't have to pay out for such user-mod.

      It's like that dude who modded Xbox to play pirated games, Microsoft will be sued for promoting software piracy.

    5. Re:Been there, done that, this worries me! by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 2, Funny

      Then what do you suggest, that someone mod the system to allow controlling both at the same time? That's as much the fault of MS as the OP's PlayStation in his car was the fault of Sony.

      Don't naysay for the sake of saying nay. This system is as infallible as, say, a lightswitch. There's no way a bulb can be both off and on at the same time. (And nobody say Schroedinger. A bulb's too big for quantum effects to really take place.)

    6. Re:Been there, done that, this worries me! by brain+defrag · · Score: 1

      The only problem is that it's not a user-mod if it was an option when the car was purchased.

    7. Re:Been there, done that, this worries me! by mikiN · · Score: 5, Funny

      The safety feature is that this is a drive-by-wire system

      [blink, read again, funny feeling in stomach, then do utmost to quench a severe gag reflex...]

      Drive by wire...steering wheel, gas AND brake...controlled by an Xbox 360??

      Hell knows I want to be outside a 100 mile radius when a beast like that is in motion on a f*ing road. Serious!

      This must be a safety engineer's nightmare come true.

      --
      The Hacker's Guide To The Kernel: Don't panic()!
    8. Re:Been there, done that, this worries me! by krakelohm · · Score: 5, Funny

      "The only way you might be able to play while the car was in motion is if someone was pushing the car from behind."

      Its a Nissan, it is expected to be pushed from behind :).

      --
      You are all a bunch of idots.
    9. Re:Been there, done that, this worries me! by prockcore · · Score: 1


      Its a Nissan, it is expected to be pushed from behind :).


      I know that was supposed to be funny, but Nissan has an extremely high reliability rating. Whether or not that will be affected by MS has yet to be seen, of course :)

    10. Re:Been there, done that, this worries me! by AmberBlackCat · · Score: 1

      I still wouldn't feel comfortable driving a car running Windows.

    11. Re:Been there, done that, this worries me! by splerdu · · Score: 2, Interesting
      That would be just about every new BMW. (in addition to others)
      i-drive uses a variant of Windows CE
      Over 25 preinstalled and aftermarket devices from 13 world-class automakers and suppliers including Acura, BMW, Citroën, Clarion Co. Ltd., DaimlerChrysler, Fiat, Subaru, Honda, Hyundai, Mitsubishi, NexTech, Toyota, and Volvo are currently running on the Windows Automotive platform.
    12. Re:Been there, done that, this worries me! by CommanderData · · Score: 1

      I have been there, done that on a much larger screen. There was a large arcade in Nashua, NH (the name escapes me right now) in the 1990s that had a neat driving game based on a Mazda Miata. You sat in the Miata and controlled Ridge Racer (with the gas, brake, and steering wheel) on a huge 10' screen in front of the car. I think it was one of only a few prototype systems in the world at that point. Not sure if it's still around, or been upgraded to a more modern game...

      --
      Urge to post... fading... fading... RISING!... fading... fading... gone.
    13. Re:Been there, done that, this worries me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If a user finds a way around the intended purpose of a device, how exactly is it not a user mod?

    14. Re:Been there, done that, this worries me! by colinbrash · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's electrical, and therefore can be modified. I can't imagine a reasonable scenario in which both cannot be controlled at the same time, given the right (fairly simple, seeing as it is electrical) modifications.

      On the other hand, I'm not too worried about people modifying it to play while driving. You can modify your car not to beep when your selt belt is off (assuming you have this feature), but not a lot of people do this. Why? Because (a) it takes time, and (b) it is dumb. Most people are going to get caught by these two hindrances when it comes to any sort of modification to play and drive at the same time.

      What I am worried about, however, is people playing this game for a couple hours while their kid has soccer practice or whatever, and then driving around on real streets. While we all like to pretend video games don't affect reality, the truth is that our brains take time to switch from one scenario to another. I've experienced it, and I'm sure others have as well. Who left the theater after seeing Gone in 60 Seconds or The Fast and the Furious and didn't drive at least a bit more dangeriously than they normally would have?

      This doesn't mean people are suddenly going to be racing down streets as if in a video game, but that urge to drive just a little faster, take that turn just a little sharper, etc. etc. etc. -- that urge is going to be a lot fresher and more tempting if you go driving directly after playing the game, and more importantly, in the the exact same environment in which you just played the game.

    15. Re:Been there, done that, this worries me! by duffahtolla · · Score: 1

      May 12, 2003
      Windows BMW

      Reuters: "Security guards smashed their way into an official limousine with sledgehammers on Monday to rescue Thailand's finance minister after his car's computer failed."

      Yeah its old, but it's still funny..

    16. Re:Been there, done that, this worries me! by dbrutus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The killer app for this is to create a functional DUI test for the car. You pass, you drive, you get lower insurance rates and a higher barrier to conviction if you get pulled over and your BAC is over the legal limit. This will likely get rolled out for truckers too.

    17. Re:Been there, done that, this worries me! by TrekCycling · · Score: 1

      Only 25??? Doesn't the statute of limitations on being an idiot end somewhere around 23?

    18. Re:Been there, done that, this worries me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe he misread "Nissan" as "anything the big three have produced in the last thirty years." Easy mistake to make.

    19. Re:Been there, done that, this worries me! by poor_boi · · Score: 1
      This system is as infallible as, say, a lightswitch. There's no way a bulb can be both off and on at the same time. (And nobody say Schroedinger. A bulb's too big for quantum effects to really take place.)

      A better analogy would be a switch which controls two lights. In switch position 1, light A is on and light B is off. In switch position 2, light A is off and light B is on. Now I guarantee with a little copper and solder you could hack that switch so that in position 1, say, light A is on AND light B is on, which equates to the user driving physically and driving virtually at the same time.

      -p

    20. Re:Been there, done that, this worries me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Brilliant car the RS, pretty much the first "WRX" and a nice little sleeper. Better interior too. :)

      Pity you've sold it though. There's an RS club, check it out http://www.rslibertyclub.org/

    21. Re:Been there, done that, this worries me! by cgenman · · Score: 4, Funny

      The safety feature is that this is a drive-by-wire system,

      The safety feature is that this is an Xbox 360: there isn't enough juice to both play the system and power the car.

    22. Re:Been there, done that, this worries me! by Awptimus+Prime · · Score: 1

      This will likely get rolled out for truckers too.

      Probably not. The lifespan of a typical truck is many times that of a normal passenger car. Also, the cost of modifying a proven truck design to integrate a game console would be quite high.

      Most truckers have a sleeper cab with a decent TV installed. More are moving towards larger plasma and LCD displays and attaching ps2 and xbox systems to them.

      Finally, most truckers sit in that front seat 8 hours a day. The last thing they'll want to do is sit in that same seat and pretend to drive. I am thinking most would rather crawl back into the sleeper and lay down for some gaming or get on their laptop.

    23. Re:Been there, done that, this worries me! by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 1

      Now I guarantee with a little copper and solder you could hack that switch so that in position 1, say, light A is on AND light B is on, which equates to the user driving physically and driving virtually at the same time.

      Yeah, and I guarantee with a little Xbox you could be playing PGR in an existing car, with no lockout at all. Much simpler than buying one of these cars and modding it. The point is that the car as sold, without additional components or solder or a television screen in front of the driver, is safe.

    24. Re:Been there, done that, this worries me! by poor_boi · · Score: 1

      That's not the point you made in your OP -- the point on which I was arguing. However, I concede that an unmodified car is probably safe -- not considering that it may reinforce a kid's view of driving as a video game and that severe automobile crashes can be driven away from, at high speeds ;-)

    25. Re:Been there, done that, this worries me! by poor_boi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Windows CE is actually a fairly reliable true-Real-Time OS. To be honest with you, I don't know what I'd rather drive -- a car with an open source RTOS written by dudes on the internet, or a car with a corporate RTOS written by a billion dollar corporate entity. Tough call when your life is on the line.

    26. Re:Been there, done that, this worries me! by Chowderbags · · Score: 1

      If you're really that concerned about lighting, might I suggest a dimmer switch? Perfect for moodsetting, too!

    27. Re:Been there, done that, this worries me! by shirai · · Score: 1

      The simulator setup of this is extremely cool but if I drive my car immediately after, say, playing Burnout, I have to suppress the urge to drive like I'm in a video game. I mean, I KNOW I'm not playing a video game anymore, but every car I see looks like a ramming object and I feel like if I just tip the back wheel of that car coming up, I can get a nice burnout bonus going.

      I wonder if removing an important psychological difference between the videogame and the reality might (not saying will) cause instinctive reactions to be wrong. Obviously you still have the visual difference but now the steering wheel, accelerator, brake, etc. will be the same.

      Let me attribute it this way: there is this door leading into an area with a bank machine. This door was horribly designed in that it had two bars. A vertical bar and a horizontal bar. Through years of design, we know that a vertical bar means pull and a horizontal means push. I had a good laugh watching people push/pull this thing the wrong way over and over again. I even commented on this to a friend. And of course, I had to go get some cash and I got in just fine. On the way out, in the split second where I was trying to figure it out in my head to decipher how it was backward, I screwed it up.

      My point of all this is that if a problem were to happen, it would probably be in the instinctive category where our knowledge is not always tied to our reactions.

      That said, I've always thought it would be cool to be able to "play car" in your real car.

      --
      Sunny

      Be my Friend

    28. Re:Been there, done that, this worries me! by pembo13 · · Score: 1

      You are making yourself seem like a stereotypical American. Where I come from, Nissans are a highly respected brand due to their low maintainance needs.

      --
      "Thanks for all the money you paid to us. We've used it to buy off ISO among other things" -Microsoft
    29. Re:Been there, done that, this worries me! by HD+Webdev · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, I'm not too worried about people modifying it to play while driving. You can modify your car not to beep when your selt belt is off (assuming you have this feature), but not a lot of people do this. Why? Because (a) it takes time, and (b) it is dumb. Most people are going to get caught by these two hindrances when it comes to any sort of modification to play and drive at the same time.

      This may shock you, but there are many people who disable (or have someone else do it) ABS because it "feels funny" compared to what they are used to when depressing the brake pedal.

      Yes, it's stupid, but it's not unusual. Trust me, "stupid" is not a very high hurdle to jump.

      --
      This is not a dream, not a dream...we are transmitting from the year 1-9-9-9.
    30. Re:Been there, done that, this worries me! by hugzz · · Score: 3, Informative
      Its a Nissan, it is expected to be pushed from behind :).

      Looking at a reliability test.. "Number of failures per 100 policies", Nissan is 8th best, with 23.44 per 100. While this may sound high, it's better than mercedes with 24.30, volvo with 31.09, ford with 32.16 and bmw with 33.16 (well it also beats a LOT of other cars but those are just a select few that I chose for their prestige ie bmw and merc, their reputation ie volvo, and how damn common they are ie ford)

      While you were probably joking, ./ is a sciency site after all so we should have some reality and facts hidden deep somewhere

    31. Re:Been there, done that, this worries me! by DurendalMac · · Score: 1

      Oh come on, this would be great for playing GTA...with or without the gaming system. The bodies bouncing over the windshield look so realistic!

    32. Re:Been there, done that, this worries me! by krakelohm · · Score: 1

      There was a hint of humor implied on the post but with 1/4 problem quota (23.44/100) there is also a tinge of reality in the post.

      --
      You are all a bunch of idots.
    33. Re:Been there, done that, this worries me! by hugzz · · Score: 3, Informative
      23.44/100 really isn't large at all. A "failure" isn't the engine exploding. It's the hinge on your cig lighter coming out of place.

      Consider how many parts are on a car. In 23 out of every 100 nissans, one of those parts will fail.

      That said, the best results on the survey in question were mazda (17.88), toyota (18.62), honda (19.41)

    34. Re:Been there, done that, this worries me! by KiloByte · · Score: 1

      Finally, most truckers sit in that front seat 8 hours a day. The last thing they'll want to do is sit in that same seat and pretend to drive. I am thinking most would rather crawl back into the sleeper and lay down for some gaming or get on their laptop.

      8 hours a day? Where???

      When they're on route, they typically drive 18 or so hours per day, and if you include having to eat/etc, you'll see that they really are dead tired afterwards and think about sleep, not about playing silly games.

      Of course, law is against them, but if the trucker can choose between getting surely fired on one hand, and _possibly_ having to pay a small bribe to a police officer on the other, the choice is obvious.

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    35. Re:Been there, done that, this worries me! by AmberBlackCat · · Score: 1

      I think I'd rather have one controlled by a state machine, but I don't know hardware or automotive engineering. I just feel like something much less complex is less likely to have some obscure bug in it that will show up at the worst possible time. And the first time we got a Windows CE device is the first time I saw a handheld organizer lock up. I had seen Microsoft wreck desktops but I didn't think they'd do the same with a PDA. I started to think maybe Microsoft isn't the way to go for anything that absolutely must not lock up. For what it's worth, I think being able to play a racing game in a real car could be fun. It just needs to have the whole windshield turn into a display, and needs heavily tinted windows so people passing by don't see you looking like you're aggressively driving while your car isn't going anywhere.

    36. Re:Been there, done that, this worries me! by PainBot · · Score: 1

      There's a good chance the wheel communicates through a CAN network. I think with a CAN monitoring/emitting system, you could still make it work by replicating what the wheel sends and directing that to the XBOX.

    37. Re:Been there, done that, this worries me! by Viol8 · · Score: 1

      Personally I'd prefer no OS at all. Cars used to be able to run quite
      happily with no computers whatsoever and very little electronics. The ONLY
      reason computers are in cars is to have VERY small improvements in miles
      per gallon but mainly as a marketing tool - "Ooh , look at this cool
      gizmo telling me how many doors are open , duh , I must have that! *slobber*".
      Etc.

    38. Re:Been there, done that, this worries me! by couch_potato · · Score: 1

      Volvo lost their reputation as soon as Ford acquired them.

    39. Re:Been there, done that, this worries me! by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

      I can drive drunk so I could pass the test.

      next

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    40. Re:Been there, done that, this worries me! by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      Are the computers/extra electronics not responsible for the improved reliability of modern cars?

      I always assumed they were, and am courious if I am ust full of shit.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    41. Re:Been there, done that, this worries me! by canavan · · Score: 1

      ...controlled by an Xbox 360??

      No, it's not controlled by an Xbox - there's an Xbox in the car that can "see" the control signals for the steering and the pedals, nothing more. All the other 'drive by wire' hardware in the car are as off-the-shelf as it gets.

    42. Re:Been there, done that, this worries me! by jacksonj04 · · Score: 1

      The reason most new cars have on-board computers is safety, strangely enough. The computer alerts you to problems, adapts engine operation to let you safely stop in the event of a failure, and in our new car also controls adaptive braking (Adjusts with speed of travel, prevents locking, sliding on ice, and generally makes for smoother and faster braking), predictive lighting (Adjusts headlight dip depending on speed and steering so you can see further at higher speed), steering correction (Notices erratic steering and alerts you to it). It also runs climate control, satnav, all the instruments, and central locking.

      These systems are not all one computer though, there are seperate subsystems for various bits with the drive-by-wire being about as raw as you can get.

      --
      How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
    43. Re:Been there, done that, this worries me! by Viol8 · · Score: 1

      I'd choose a solid metal shaft connecting my steering wheel to the road
      above any electronics , no matter how reliable. Yes , you're right about
      all of the above , but lets face it , none of it is essential for a car.
      And as for predictive lighting, well Citreon had that in the 50s with the
      lights being connected to and turned by the the steering rod. A mechanical
      no brainer.

    44. Re:Been there, done that, this worries me! by startling · · Score: 1

      I rarely play games, but when, quite a few years ago, I visited a friend's office he insisted that I try a new game he had just installed called Carmageddon. Not knowing what I was doing I promptly crashed into a queue of people waiting at a bus stop and, to my amazement, I was awarded an 'artistic merit bonus'. Call me sick, but I found that hilarious and was hooked for an hour or so before I had to leave. I got straight into my car which was parked just outside my friend's office. An old lady was pushing a shopping basket in front of my car, and I was shocked to find that I had to resist a very slight urge to accelerate and go for the points.

      Also, I've seen big warning signs at Go-Kart tracks that warn people, when leaving, to drive carefully because, apparently, accident rates are much higher after driving a Go-Kart then getting into a road car.

    45. Re:Been there, done that, this worries me! by espressojim · · Score: 1

      Alternative hypothesis - Luxury cars (BMW, etc) will have more reported errors, because users expect their cars to be perfect, while users of non-luxury cars will not complain (or pay to get fixed, and thus be reported) minor problems.

      I'm thinking of people I know that have very nice cars, and they must be perfect, or are brought into the dealer. I'm comparing that to my own personal experience of people who don't have 'luxury' cars, who don't care if there's a slight problem with the dashboard plastic, etc.

      Any idea how the alternate hypothesis works out? I'm simply curious to see if this is the reliability of the cars, or a reporting bias.

    46. Re:Been there, done that, this worries me! by RESPAWN · · Score: 1

      I'm actually really surprised that Mazda is at the top. Not that they are unreliable, but I think people generally perceive Toyota and Honda as being way more reliable than a Mazda. Maybe it was the old RX-7s that gave Mazda its bad name. Most of the reliability issues associated with those cars, however, were due to abuse/lack of maintenance. I've been a fan of Mazdas for a while now and I'm glad to see that they have the reliability figures to back up their reputation. That said, I still own a Honda since they depreciate less than a Mazda.

      --

      If Murphy's Law can go wrong, it will.

    47. Re:Been there, done that, this worries me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      /me dons the asbestos suit
      Could this have possibly been a dig at the horsepower rating of Nissan's past and current crop?

    48. Re:Been there, done that, this worries me! by squidguy · · Score: 1

      Nissan has an extremely high reliability rating.
      Maybe on paper, but both Nissan products I had were crap compared to their Toyota and Honda counterparts.

    49. Re:Been there, done that, this worries me! by Prophet+of+Nixon · · Score: 1

      I loved that game, a shame the sequels were total crap. Myself and a few others still call out point values on pedestrians and livestock while driving around, though we've restrained ourselves from mashing any.

    50. Re:Been there, done that, this worries me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hm I think that it's not a consumer test but done properly by one of those testing organisations

    51. Re:Been there, done that, this worries me! by Bellum+Aeternus · · Score: 1
      I can't say that I agree with you. I've never come off of a four hour marithon of WoW and attempted to blast somebody with a Frost Bolt before...

      Serisouly, if gaming were that dangerous we'd have hundreds, if not thousands, of cases of peopling being gunned down after an intense Quake session (people still playing Quake?).

      --
      - I voted for Nintendo and against Bush
    52. Re:Been there, done that, this worries me! by Saige · · Score: 1

      That makes me happy to see. We replaced a 97 Intrepid this summer, buying a mostly-loaded Mazda3 5-door, with plans to drive it for a long time. Glad to know we picked a good manufacturer to do this with. And the car is wonderful too.

      --
      "You know your god is man-made when he hates all the same people you do."
    53. Re:Been there, done that, this worries me! by blugu64 · · Score: 1

      And why should we use spreadsheets either! I mean I'd choose a solid graphite pencil connected to a a ledger pad above excel/open office, no matter how reliable! Excel isn't essential for a ledger, and as for calculating the chineese had it right in the (....long time ago...) with the abacus! A Mechanical No brainer!

      (yes I'm just being sarcastic to make a point)

      --
      "Personal ownership is a hallmark of conservative capitalism. And I don't believe I am entitled to anything that I did n
    54. Re:Been there, done that, this worries me! by poor_boi · · Score: 1

      And why should we use spreadsheets either! I mean I'd choose a solid graphite pencil connected to a a ledger pad above excel/open office, no matter how reliable! Maybe because a spreadsheet crashing never killed anyone. =P

    55. Re:Been there, done that, this worries me! by NerdWear · · Score: 1

      I actually had this happen to me the other day after I took my pet turtle, Mr. Boxy, to the vet. I engaged in an intense session of Mario Kart DS while in the waiting room, and found myself driving... abnormally in real life when I left.

      I was driving along fine at first, but things went downhill when I noticed the car behind me was following way too close to my bumper. Instead of responding in a normal fashion, I immediately took a sharp turn without braking, instead I simply turned the wheel back and forth rapidly until sparks shot out from my tires. I then grabbed Mr. Boxy and tossed him out the sunroof at my pursuer's vehicle.

      In the end, I guess it worked out OK... as you can imagine, the guy stopped following me so close.

      Well, it didn't really work out so well for Mr. Boxy.

    56. Re:Been there, done that, this worries me! by daddymac · · Score: 1

      Unpossible! Think about it: The CD (or DVD) would be skipping to much when the car was in motion.

      --
      If something I said can be interpreted two ways, and one of the ways makes you sad or angry, I meant the other one.
    57. Re:Been there, done that, this worries me! by japhmi · · Score: 1

      Do you have your source? (not that I doubt you, but I'd just like to look things up)

      --
      "Giving money and power to government is like giving whiskey and car keys to teenage boys" P. J. O'Rourke
    58. Re:Been there, done that, this worries me! by dbrutus · · Score: 1

      Truckers often get paid by the mile. If an integrated test console (it'll be the same tech but not for games) can safely permit truckers to drive an hour longer a day by giving them a quicky reflex and observation test, that's money in the trucker's pocket and lower insurance rates for the company.

    59. Re:Been there, done that, this worries me! by dbrutus · · Score: 1

      No, you can't drive drunk. The crime that everybody's trying to nail is driving unsafely under the influence of alcohol. They call it DUI for that reason. You're driving drunk when you've had so much that you're under the influence. If your personal alcohol tolerance is higher (genetics or you're an alcoholic), what is DUI for others is not DUI for you. The whole idea is to create a test that captures that data instead of throwing you in jail/taking away driving privileges unjustly because we can test BAC but can't do functional testing with the same ease.

    60. Re:Been there, done that, this worries me! by dbrutus · · Score: 1

      I don't know what country you're talking about but in the US, truckers aren't allowed to drive more than 11 hours a day. Those extra 7 hours you talk about would be profitable, but illegal. US truckers are allowed to drive a maximum of 11 hours a day and 77 hours a week. You have to have 10 continuous hours off a day (I googled this off a trucker magazine so it's likely pretty reliable).

      If instead of using logbooks to measure time off the road, you could measure the functional ability of a trucker and allow him to run as long as his attention and body can hold out, you might be able to safely increase driving time.

    61. Re:Been there, done that, this worries me! by hurfy · · Score: 1

      Thats only about half the effect as going to a (good) go-kart track. I had THINK about driving my soft sprung Explorer home after buzzing around a warehouse in 40mph go-kart :) An hour there seems to produce an alternate driving reality, but damn its fun :) Video games (yes i have a full-size sit-down race seat set-up) don't come close. A movie? you're just looking for an excuse ;)

      Nonetheless the feeling is there and a brief period to catch ones breath and brains would be good idea. Using the same wheel and pedals could add to it a fair amount.

    62. Re:Been there, done that, this worries me! by KiloByte · · Score: 1

      in the US, truckers aren't allowed to drive more than 11 hours a day.

      "allowed". Exactly. And...?

      Those extra 7 hours you talk about would be profitable, but illegal.

      So, they have profitable on one hand, and legal on the other. Since the former is needed to stay above the thin margins, spedition companies can't really afford to care about "legal" things, and enforcement is pretty weak. The truckers themselves don't rat their employeer in for obvious reasons -- they can stomach it or find a different job.

      The laws were made specifically to prevent this abuse, but without decent enforcement, they are ineffective.

      And in this case, it's not retarded socialist rambling -- it's a matter of safety on the roads.

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    63. Re:Been there, done that, this worries me! by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

      sorry bro but DUI has a strict legal definition here defined as "please blow into this sir", not "can you touch your fucking nose" so personal alcohol tolerance or driving skill is not a factor, except for going undetected.

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    64. Re:Been there, done that, this worries me! by zevans · · Score: 1
      Volvo lost their reputation as soon as Ford acquired them.


      Er, Ford also "own" Mazda...

      --
      "... and more and more now there are all kinds of electronic goodies available" -- Pink Floyd 1972
    65. Re:Been there, done that, this worries me! by zevans · · Score: 1
      I'm comparing that to my own personal experience of people who don't have 'luxury' cars, who don't care if there's a slight problem with the dashboard plastic, etc. Any idea how the alternate hypothesis works out? I'm simply curious to see if this is the reliability of the cars, or a reporting bias.

      I think you're right...

      ...but then again, there is a certain expectation of quality generated by a price tag. If I were to pay over 100k sterling for a 911 GT3, you can guarantee it'll be back to the dealer if it so much as takes more than one turn of the starter to catch.

      On the Skoda we were given for free, most of the passenger side dash disintegrated and we drove it like that for six months...

      Also, different markets are sensitive to different things. As a user of rx8club.com and rx8ownersclub.co.uk it's clear that the Americans are way more sensitive to the smallest deviation from perfection, because they quite rightly expect to get what they pay for. The UK consumer seems to almost expect trouble.

      --
      "... and more and more now there are all kinds of electronic goodies available" -- Pink Floyd 1972
    66. Re:Been there, done that, this worries me! by zevans · · Score: 1
      Best you can do with a carb-fed car tuned for economy... probably 30mpg?

      Best you can do with a direct injection fully managed and mapped system? At least 60mpg.

      More than a "slight" improvement, don't you think?

      And in terms of gCO2/km - don't even go there.

      --
      "... and more and more now there are all kinds of electronic goodies available" -- Pink Floyd 1972
    67. Re:Been there, done that, this worries me! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      Mercedes and BMWs are having MAJOR problems on a REGULAR basis these days. BMWs have NEVER been all that reliable and Mercedes went to hell in the early nineties. I own one of the last great Mercedes, a 1981 300SD Turbo Diesel W126. The W126 was Mercedes' first 100% high-strength-steel unibody and it's heavy as hell and very rigid. With the turbo diesel, I do great on the highway, can't go up a hill worth a crap, and get about 25mpg mixed. This is around lake county, which is pretty damned hilly. This is an '81! I got it for $2500. Original price was aorund $33k, which would be $70-something-thousand in 2002 dollars (inflation calculators often don't go up to the present day.) They're pretty readily available around California. It's got 306,000 miles on it (and change) and has never had an engine rebuild. Talk about a tank! All the bushings and bearings and such outside the engnie/trans are starting to go, but it's old.

      These days, Mercedes and BMW are both using cheaper components than they have traditionally done. My father (not the greatest car guy, but he's been around) asserts that the europeans mostly took the stance that great components make a great car, while the Japanese believe that a great system of components makes a great car. The Japanese theory seems to have been borne out pretty well, and the cars are much cheaper to make.

      On the other hand, there's no Japanese luxury car put together as well as my Benzo, even the Nissans, and I'm a pretty serious Nissan enthusiast who owns an S13 with full race suspension. The Lexuses - er, I mean, Toyotas - are particularly craptacular. They are very difficult to deal with and more expensive to work on than my Mercedes. For example, the front upper ball joint is not replacable without replacing the entire A-arm! Fucking bastards. No matter what badge you put on a Toyota, it's still a POS.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    68. Re:Been there, done that, this worries me! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      Mazdas DO seem to be less reliable in ways that matter. If you go to junkyards and such you see a lot more 323s than Civics, yet Honda sold a lot more Civics than Mazda sold 323s. Granted, there's lots of other cars based on the 323, like the ford escort, mercury tracer... but you see lots of those shitboxes in junkyards, too.

      The non-TT RX7s are not all that unreliable, except that they need fairly frequent engine seal replacements. Everything else seems to be pretty good!

      The TT RX7s had a complex and poorly designed vacuum system, that made them total fiascos.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    69. Re:Been there, done that, this worries me! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I am thinking most would rather crawl back into the sleeper and lay down for some gaming or get on their laptop.

      Sure, if by "laptop" you mean "cute little hitchhiker"...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    70. Re:Been there, done that, this worries me! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Mostly, modern cars are more reliable due to engineering. They're more efficient due to the computers. For example I have one of the most efficient automobile engines of the 1980s, a Mercedes 3 liter inline 5 cylinder turbo diesel. I've got a 3500 pound car and get 25 mpg mixed. Today, you can get a 1.8 liter TDI motor in a VW rabbit or golf and get over 50 mpg; granted, that weighs about half as much, but there's still drag and such. AND, while I have a whopping 170 ft-lb from a 3 liter engine, they have 150 ft-lb from a 1.8 liter.

      Put another way, an old camaro with a 4 barrel 350 gets maybe 10 mpg around town and 20 on the freeway. A newer camaro with a fuel injected (TPI, or SFI, not TBI) 350 will get about 17 and 25, respectively, and I'm talking about the pug-ugly third generation, which has the greatest drag.

      The reliability is mostly due to better engineering and better machining, and higher standards which can be met due to those two factors.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    71. Re:Been there, done that, this worries me! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Actually, if you connected the wheel motor to the wheels motor (the one replacing the rack, or augmenting its motion) as a motor-generator pair, then add power as necessary, you'll still be able to steer if the power goes out. Some of those electric motors are pretty incredibly efficient these days. For a fun experiment, wire two of those lego motors back to back and attach legos to the shafts, then turn one and see how much the other one turns...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    72. Re:Been there, done that, this worries me! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Actually, lots of people have done this. You can go so far as to go to a junkyard and get someone to cut the interesting part of the car out for you, so it won't take up a lot of space.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    73. Re:Been there, done that, this worries me! by RESPAWN · · Score: 1

      Ahh... but the TT RX7s are quite an experience to drive. I've only had the opportunity to drive one once, but I was quite pleased at the way boost came on in the car. The problem with entine seal replacements (and I'm assuming you mean the apex seals on the rotors) is that you have to take the entire engine apart to do replace them. Taking the engine apart can sometimes introduce several new points of failure if the mechanic is especially unskilled or unfamiliar with a rotary engine. It's rather unlike a piston engine where you only need to disassemble, say, half the engine to replace a head gasket. It's not that rebuilding a rotary is that hard - in fact, a case could be made that it's easier since there are fewer parts - but I've had friends take their RX7s to mechanics who just can't get it right.

      Most of the problems that I've seen with the NA RX7s have to do with the engine overheating at one time or another. I'd say that in about 95% of those cases, the overheating caused a burst in the water jacket, leading to coolant in the combustion chamber. RX7s run hotter than most standard piston engines and proper cooling is much more important due to the somewhat delicate nature of thier design.

      The other issues I've seen usually have to do with the owner not keeping tabs on their oil level and not adding oil as needed, leading to improperly lubricated components which eventually fail.

      --

      If Murphy's Law can go wrong, it will.

  2. Power supply? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wouldn't like to play in one of those only to find out I couldn't start the car 10 minutes later because the XBox ran the battery flat.
    (unless it was someone else's car of course)

    1. Re:Power supply? by richdun · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, presumably you could leave the engine on while playing and the battery won't run out, ever! (as long as you have gas that is, but that stuff is cheap these days, right?)

    2. Re:Power supply? by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 1

      leave the engine on while playing

      Unlike dihydrogen monoxide, carbon monoxide actually is dangerous.

    3. Re:Power supply? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Are you really trying to say DHMO isn't dangerous?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:Power supply? by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 1

      DHMO doesn't drown anyone. They were just addicted to oxygen.

  3. Oh, good by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 4, Funny

    Now I can finally make a fool of myself in public by playing a driving game when I should be speaking to the police officer knocking on the window!

    1. Re:Oh, good by moro_666 · · Score: 1

      and you can do doom3 on the highway, uh yeah ... all these corpses ... and the cop will still knock on your window ... maybe even shooting at the window ...

      --

      I'd tell you the chances of this story being a dupe, but you wouldn't like it.
  4. Crash? Plasti-screen of death? by davidsyes · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Well, at LEAST these vehicle crashes won't make for fatalities... I HOPE!

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
    1. Re:Crash? Plasti-screen of death? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless you were playing Mortal Kombat...

  5. Lame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't think of any other word to describe this.

  6. Oh super idea guys by radiotyler · · Score: 2, Funny

    Don't worry: cops will still be more worried about you talking on your cell phone while driving. Quick game of GTA anyone?

    --
    hi mom!
    1. Re:Oh super idea guys by dada21 · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'd play you but I spilled some Hot Coffee in my lap going through the drive thru.

    2. Re:Oh super idea guys by radiotyler · · Score: 1

      ZING!

      I bow down man, that was truly, truly awe inspiring.

      --
      hi mom!
    3. Re:Oh super idea guys by Joe123456 · · Score: 0

      You buy with the money you got from that

  7. popular science by User+956 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Popular science did a cool article where they had pro racers race in Forza motorsport, and then on the actual track.

    The consensus was that it's easier to take corners at speed in the game because there's a lower penalty for crash.

    --
    The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
  8. Of course, what they *really* want... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...is some kind of of display built into the windscreen and side windows...

  9. Gaming after-effects by MavEtJu · · Score: 1

    the Nissan URGE concept car allows drivers (while parked) to play 'Project Gotham Racing 3'

    Based on my own experiences and stories I read here of people playing games too long, this can be very dangerous for people who just stopped parking...

    --
    bash$ :(){ :|:&};:
    1. Re:Gaming after-effects by ArTiCwInD · · Score: 1

      Yeah, try driving on a road after 36 hrs non-stop of GTA: Vice City. You feel like running down the next 50 pedestrians for multiplier bonus.

    2. Re:Gaming after-effects by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I feel like that every day!

      Whats GTA?

      God damn pedestrians!!

    3. Re:Gaming after-effects by linuxfanatic1024 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      GTA == Grand Theft Auto

      Personally, I wish that game never came out...

      --
      Microsoft-free since March 28, 2004
  10. Sounds dangerous to me by Aussie · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What happens when a child decides to play the car game by themselves ?
    Seems like lawsuit heaven in the making.

    1. Re:Sounds dangerous to me by slashname3 · · Score: 1

      To say nothing of the irate trucker that you are sitting in front of at the light while you are trying to get to that next level. If this becomes wide spread expect to see a story about someone getting shot because they backed up traffic at a stop light playing a game.

  11. I designed something like this by CrazyJim1 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Before GTA was big, I thought it would be fun to make a game where you're robbing banks and running away with loot. You have the wheelman, and the other 3 people in the car have weapons. All the windows are screens you can shoot out of. But its like anything else... If you don't have a corporation behind you backing your idea, it never flies.

    1. Re:I designed something like this by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

      don't blame the corps for the fauilure of your lame idea

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    2. Re:I designed something like this by amliebsch · · Score: 1
      If you don't have a corporation behind you backing your idea, it never flies.

      That's just like my idea for a Jump To Conclusions Mat. You see, it's this mat, with different conclusions on it...

      --
      If you don't know where you are going, you will wind up somewhere else.
  12. Racing from game to reality... by Erik_ · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is so dangerous. People who play good racing games and leave to take their car, will so quickly think they are back in their game and speed up. This has happenend to a good friend of mine. Never had a speeding ticket... plays one long session of Gotham racing. Heads home... and get's his driving license suspended due to his speed.

    1. Re:Racing from game to reality... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just wait till they put Dead or Alive into these video game cars and watch how fast the number of car crashes go up...

    2. Re:Racing from game to reality... by MidnightBrewer · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I don't think that would apply to everybody, though. There is still a distinct difference between reality and a video game. However, putting a video game in a car is definitely tempting fate, and making your car into a video game is just stupid.

      --
      "Give a man fire, and he'll be warm for a day; set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life
    3. Re:Racing from game to reality... by RasputinAXP · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This has happenend to a good friend of mine. Never had a speeding ticket... plays one long session of Gotham racing. Heads home... and get's his driving license suspended due to his speed.

      Then, good sir, your friend is a jackass incapable of distinguishing between real life and a video game.

    4. Re:Racing from game to reality... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've seen this with Burnout before. A friend hears song from the game on the radio and says she almost floors it every time.

    5. Re:Racing from game to reality... by Trojan35 · · Score: 1

      He deserved it. I drink, and it's tempting to drive home drunk, but I don't. He played a racing game, was tempted to drive home faster and did. This is why I have a license and he doesn't. Looks like the system is working in this case.

    6. Re:Racing from game to reality... by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This has happenend to a good friend of mine. Never had a speeding ticket... plays one long session of Gotham racing. Heads home... and get's his driving license suspended due to his speed.

      Then, good sir, your friend is a jackass incapable of distinguishing between real life and a video game.


      Not his friend, kind sir. His friend's reflexes. Your nervous system and muscles get used to responding one way, and they'll keep responding that way. If you've ever skated, you'll notice that you walk slightly differently immediately when leaving - you're pretending your shoes work slightly like skates. It's not that you can't distinguish between shoes and skates, it's that you've trained your muscles differently.

      Try it: get an observer (single-blind to the purpose of the test if you really want) to see how you drive somewhere, play a racing game there, and ask him if you drove as cautiously on the way back.

    7. Re:Racing from game to reality... by Awptimus+Prime · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This is so dangerous. People who play good racing games and leave to take their car, will so quickly think they are back in their game and speed up. This has happenend to a good friend of mine. Never had a speeding ticket... plays one long session of Gotham racing. Heads home... and get's his driving license suspended due to his speed.

      Yeah, I often take my 12 gauge out and shoot a bunch of people right after a good game of counter-strike. Then, I go play some Monopoly and find myself buying out all the local businesses the next morning. :rollseyes:

      Your friend is a moron if he was that easily influenced. I play console racers for hours and hours at a time, then when I drive home, I obey the speed limit. Just because you feel slower in a real car, doesn't mean you have also lost your vision and can no longer read the gauges.

    8. Re:Racing from game to reality... by glitch23 · · Score: 0

      So his parents didn't sue the manufacturer for him not being able to distinguish between reality and virtual reality?

      --
      this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom. -- Lincoln, Gettysburg Address
    9. Re:Racing from game to reality... by RasputinAXP · · Score: 1

      If you've ever skated, you'll notice that you walk slightly differently immediately when leaving - you're pretending your shoes work slightly like skates. It's not that you can't distinguish between shoes and skates, it's that you've trained your muscles differently.

      Actually, being a former hockey player, my muscles are pretty much always doing that; I still tend to walk with my feet like this: \ /

      As to a blind test as to my driving skills, I already know I don't drive cautiously. I drive aggressively with a modicum of defense, checking my mirrors constantly. If I didn't do that, my compact car would be crushed by the waves of SUVs on the New Jersey highways. I certainly never drive like I do in Forza Motorsport or Burnout 3 or Crazy Taxi.

      The difference here is that the muscle groups and nervous responses (unless you're in a really expensive driving rig) are different. There's no actual physical sensation of inertia, and what's more if you're playing with just a controller, you're only using your thumbs, not your feet. In the case where you drive a manual transmission, you tend to get yourself in less stupid situations from muscle memory because there's no clutch in video games, you just shift.

      I'll admit I need to wind down for about 5 or 10 minutes when I leave an SCCA event or a BMW Ultimate Drive class where I'm throwing a car (mine or theirs) around a track for a few hours, but as you said, muscle memory and reflexes play a large part in it.

    10. Re:Racing from game to reality... by mildgift · · Score: 1

      Maybe driving games should start with a warning to rest a few minutes after playing the game for a long time, because your responses to driving situations might change.

    11. Re:Racing from game to reality... by Plaid+Phantom · · Score: 1

      Heck, while they're at it they might as well stick a quick game of Frogger afterwards.

      --
      All comments are properties and trademarks of the voices in my head. Not like I'm gonna claim them.
    12. Re:Racing from game to reality... by trawg · · Score: 1

      Sheesh, please don't tell Jack Thompson this story or we'll never hear the end of it!

    13. Re:Racing from game to reality... by Grey+Ninja · · Score: 1

      Your friend is a fine example of a fuckwad. Honestly. Take some responsibility. It's not the game's fault that he got a speeding ticket. And most of all, it's absolutely ridiculous to imply that playing a video game makes you unresponsible for your actions.

    14. Re:Racing from game to reality... by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

      Activision said that they would pay the fine for anyone who got a speeding ticket on the day Burnout 2 came out here in the UK. I sped through every speed camera on the way home but none of the suckers went off =(

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    15. Re:Racing from game to reality... by Traa · · Score: 1

      Your friend is a moron if he was that easily influenced

      I congratulate you that you are not a moron that is so easily influenced. However is it really that hard to believe that there are a bunch of morons out there that are easily influenced? If they drive unsafely and hit you, would you consider that part of your problem or just their problem?

    16. Re:Racing from game to reality... by dangitman · · Score: 1
      However, putting a video game in a car is definitely tempting fate, and making your car into a video game is just stupid.

      Seems like something you would only want to do deep in the Batcave. Who would want the public to see them sitting in a stationery car pretending to drive? It's like a kid making "brrrooooom brrrrroooom" sounds while he plays with a toy car, only much sadder. plus it's made by Microsoft and Nissan. Boy, there's a couple of brands with a great reputation for quality.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    17. Re:Racing from game to reality... by Awptimus+Prime · · Score: 1

      Using that logic, we would have to ban game consoles and games on PCs.

      It is so rare that someone uses a video game as an excuse to commit a crime, and often, it looks more like a desparate move to get conservative lobbyists and leaders to blow things out of proportion in order to obtain negative media attention for "violent/wreckless" games they oppose on spiritual or moral values. Much like when those kids in Florida recently said GTA made them go out shooting people. Only a few people actually believed that, but they may have thought the media attention would make the criminals look like victims on some level, thus obtaining a lighter sentence when it comes time for the court decision.

      Regarding the GTA case, I think the issue was bad parents since the game clearly stated it was not for young children, but older teens, who have hopefully developed standards and a sense of reality by that age.

    18. Re:Racing from game to reality... by ShortSpecialBus · · Score: 1

      Actually, being a former hockey player, my muscles are pretty much always doing that; I still tend to walk with my feet like this: \ /

      I also play hockey, and I can kinda vouch for that. I'm not sure I so much walk with my feet in a V, but I can say that I no longer notice a difference after I take my skates off. I think once you build up those muscle groups, your feelings adjust more quickly. Playing 3-5 times a week gets your leg muscles built up in a hurry!

      --
      //FIXME: Bad .sig
    19. Re:Racing from game to reality... by Twanfox · · Score: 1

      There is a distinct difference between playing a computer game on a computer and carrying around a 12 gauge hunting for people. There is also a distinct difference in Monopoly. Now, if you get into a simulator/mockup of those scenarios.. say.. play Paintball with a realistic weapon, then carry that same weapon around hunting, you just might make the mistake.

      As gaming simulators get more and more realistic, in my opinion, it becomes ever more important to keep the simulator distinct from a real life situation. Playing in a simulator builds habits that, if done long enough, become reflexes. Flight simulators for pilots and astronauts do this safely, intending to build good habits. Game simulators allow for some otherwise socially unacceptable behavior to be done in a safe manner. It would be bad for that behavior to bleed over.

    20. Re:Racing from game to reality... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      Amen to that. I've been playing GTA:San Andreas. Not only have I totally failed to drive off a bridge with a 100 foot drop because jumping off would kill me but the car will keep me safe, but I haven't been splitting traffic or driving on the shoulder or up the side of an embankment, either.

      With that said, the game DOES put you in a state of heightened awareness, you're just reacting faster, so it CAN be tempting to drive faster afterwards, especially on twisty roads. All fast-driving games have this effect on me. However, I have a brain, and I occasionally use it...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  13. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 3, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  14. I wonder what happens when... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...The system crashes. Do your airbags go off at the sight of a BSoD?

  15. Bus Conversion and GTA by core+plexus · · Score: 2, Funny
    I've done this in a bus I am converting to an RV.

    Except for now, it's still in the 'concept stage' (meaning I have to imagine I am playing GTA under Linux). A few more tweaks, and I'll have it.

    What happens to reindeer the day after Christmas

  16. I doubt the Asians will jump on this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I mean come on, Nissan and xBox 360? This will never fly with the 16-30yr old Asian male demographic. //end sarc()

    1. Re:I doubt the Asians will jump on this. by eclectro · · Score: 1

      I mean come on, Nissan and xBox 360? This will never fly with the 16-30yr old Asian male demographic. //end sarc()

      You just need to add a wing on the back, then it will fly.

      --
      Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
    2. Re:I doubt the Asians will jump on this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well if they call it the Nissan 360zx then it would fit the demographic. ;)

  17. Old lady==50 points! Baby carriage==100 points! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, exactly what I need! You can hack it so that every person/object you hit you can increase your score.

  18. Re:Ack by datafr0g · · Score: 4, Funny

    Sure! Just drive at 100mph head on into a blue wall!

    Now you know how a PC running Windows 98 feels.

    --
    "Who says nothing is impossible? Some people do it every day!" - Alfred E. Neuman
  19. Dear Santa... by Chordonblue · · Score: 1

    ...WHERE'S MY XBOX 360?

    I think we know where at least some of the shipments went...

    Grrrr.. Still waiting for mine...

    --
    "...Well, there's egg and bacon; egg sausage and bacon; egg and spam; egg bacon and spam; egg bacon sausage and spam..."
    1. Re:Dear Santa... by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

      You could walk into the shops and buy as many as you wanted on Christmas Eve round here

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
  20. Carbon Monoxide Poisoning by pHatidic · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I hope the game won't run if the engine is on. Otherwise people might play it in the garage with the engine running and the car in park, and end up asphyxiating themselves.

    1. Re:Carbon Monoxide Poisoning by datafr0g · · Score: 2, Informative

      the engine would probably blow up first (if the engine is on and gears are in neutral. I'm sure I'm not alone here - the first thing I do when playing a driving game is put my foot alllll the way down on the accelerator and leave it there.

      I'm pretty sure it wouldn't work when the engine is on though - it's dangerous enough as it is without the engine going for various other reasons!!

      In fact, I can't see this coming out of concept stage at all - nice idea (i guess?) but too many risks and concerns for what the feature's worth.

      --
      "Who says nothing is impossible? Some people do it every day!" - Alfred E. Neuman
    2. Re:Carbon Monoxide Poisoning by pimpsoftcom · · Score: 2, Funny

      That is called Darwinism.

      --
      - d
    3. Re:Carbon Monoxide Poisoning by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

      Actually, that's pretty hard with newer cars. The exhaust is a lot cleaner. Not that I'd want to suck on the tailpipe, but to fill a garage with enough noxious gases would be tough.

    4. Re:Carbon Monoxide Poisoning by Sebilrazen · · Score: 1

      Bullshit!!! Hopefully they can play with it on, that's tryouts for the Darwin Awards.

      --
      "There are no facts, only interpretations." --Friedrich Nietzsche.
    5. Re:Carbon Monoxide Poisoning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, that's darwinism...

    6. Re:Carbon Monoxide Poisoning by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Na, the engine wouldn't blow up. Maybe if it's at redline and under extreme load...but that's a big IF! Not likely to happen unless your drag racing.

      However if it's in neutral and you keep redlining the engine, don't expect the engine to blow. The worst that could happen is your radiator fan stops working. By then, expect a check-engine light.

      As a side note, some cars will detect the car is in neutral and engage a rev-limiter to stop at 4,500 RPM. I know my 97 Saturn SC2 did when I lef the automatic in neutral or park and stomped on the gas.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    7. Re:Carbon Monoxide Poisoning by DigitalReverend · · Score: 1

      If the game is being played, the gas pedal controls the game, not the engine.

      --
      I read Slashdot for the headlines, because the headlines, unlike the articles, are usually original and never duplicated
    8. Re:Carbon Monoxide Poisoning by Braino420 · · Score: 1

      Yes, these people should die MUCH more horrible deaths for their stupidity.

      --
      They call me the wookie man, I guess that's what I am
    9. Re:Carbon Monoxide Poisoning by fabioaquotte · · Score: 1

      Natural Selection ?

      --
      Fabio Aquotte
  21. i can see the headlines already. by catwh0re · · Score: 2, Insightful
    "Driver kills three after revved up on racing game."

    They'd acuse the makers of trying to entice real-world drivers to speed, by supplying them with a "photorealistic" race experience through real world streets, which then entice the driver to perform along the same streets (as in the articles New York example.)

    In Australia (home country warning) it's against advertising regulations to sells cars by showing how fast/aggressive they can drive. (Which is common-sense as you can never legally drive them like that on our bodgey streets.)

    1. Re:i can see the headlines already. by slavemowgli · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't call a 7 inch screen "photorealistic" - the graphics may be, but the small screen size alone would be enough to make sure you don't really get that feeling of immersion that would make this gadget dangerous.

      Of course, it's probably still dangerous, but that's another story...

      --
      quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur.
    2. Re:i can see the headlines already. by catwh0re · · Score: 1

      i'm never much with the opinion that games are photorealistic, the quotes around the text were to indicate that I was quoting the article which marketed the game as having photorealistic graphics. Also the article notes that the screen doubles as your rear vision mirror when not being used as the gaming display. So there isn't any additional hardware dropping down to play the game.

    3. Re:i can see the headlines already. by DavidV · · Score: 1

      'Which is common-sense as you can never legally drive them like that on our bodgey streets.'

      I should have used some common-sense instead of taking my subaru for a high speed spin through the country side (around Galston, North of Sydney) after about 4 hours of Colin Mcrae 4. I would have avoided cutting it in half and a month in a coma. At least no-one else got hurt.

      --
      !sig
    4. Re:i can see the headlines already. by HD+Webdev · · Score: 1

      In Australia (home country warning) it's against advertising regulations to sells cars by showing how fast/aggressive they can drive. (Which is common-sense as you can never legally drive them like that on our bodgey streets.)

      In the USA, most of us believe that people in Australia drive like Mel Gibson.

      --
      This is not a dream, not a dream...we are transmitting from the year 1-9-9-9.
  22. Top Gear did the same thing the other day... by s-gen · · Score: 4, Informative

    They sent Clarkson round Laguna Seca in an NSX on Gran Turisimo 4 then sent him off to see if he could get the same time in the same car on the actual track.

    He couldn't... its too scary in real life.

    1. Re:Top Gear did the same thing the other day... by LegendLength · · Score: 1

      Top Gear is a great show btw for anyone who is into racing games, mainly because it is not one big infomercial like every other car show.

    2. Re:Top Gear did the same thing the other day... by beset · · Score: 1

      Not just too scary but there are many, many stupid things you can do in GT that you can't in real life like adjusting speed while on the limit in a bend or barreling into the corkscrew on the brakes and not lose the rear.

      Plus he was driving a type R in gran turismo :)

      --
      1) Clever Sig 2) ????? 3) Profit!
    3. Re:Top Gear did the same thing the other day... by RESPAWN · · Score: 1

      I gotta put in the plug for 5th Gear here. While not as entertaining as Top Gear, the show does have Tiff Needell who is probably twice the driver Clarkson is. Jason Plato isn't bad either, but I haven't seen half as much of him as I have seen of Tiff over the years. However, their Boxter/Z4 comparison was simply brilliant. It was extremely cool to see these two former professional racing drivers drifting their respective cars around the corners in unison.

      --

      If Murphy's Law can go wrong, it will.

  23. First? How about Sega and Nissan? by macshome · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Don't forget the ultra-rare Hi-Saturn Navi. I would think it pre-dates this by quite a bit.

  24. RTFA please before posting... by stubear · · Score: 2, Informative

    ...(at least the summary anyway). How fucking stupid are you people? Nissan URGE concept car, it was even in the summary. This means Nissan is pushing the boundaries of what a car is but doing so in a completly experimental environment. This will never see the light of day as is but who knows what sort of interactivity it may produce in the future?

  25. rumble? by BushCheney08 · · Score: 1

    Does it have any sort of force feedback? Fullseat rumble would be pretty cool.

    --
    Be a real patriot: Question authority. Think for yourself. Formulate your own conclusions.
    1. Re:rumble? by Scarletdown · · Score: 1

      Fullseat rumble would be pretty cool.

      Just have lunch at Taco Hell a few hours before playing. Then you will have plenty of fullseat rumble.

      --
      This space unintentionally left blank.
  26. Hail to the king, baby. by radiotyler · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Nissan conducted an Internet survey of 2,000 echo boomers, a majority of which said technology and gaming are among the most important attributes in their first car," said Bruce Campbell, vice president of design at Nissan Design America.

    Holy crap! Bruce Cambell is the vice president of design at Nissan TOO!?!?! This is my BOOMSTICK!, indeed!

    --
    hi mom!
  27. marketing? by ZachPruckowski · · Score: 1

    Who is this aimed at? How can pay a few hundred extra dollars to add this to their car? Wouldn't the kind of people this is marketed towards mostly be driving second hand cars (or at least cheap ones?). I mean, no offense, anyone with the cash to shell out for this would likely feel a level of social stigma about having a videogame system in his car.

    1. Re:marketing? by balsy2001 · · Score: 1

      A few hundred dollars? If this comes in new cars you know it will be a $3500 dollar option. Just a DVD play in a car right now costs ~$2000 add an XBOX and integrate controls into the car! This will be outrageously unaffordable. Does is come with a sweet sound system too? That way you can rock side to side and sing to the steering wheel.

      --
      GENERATION 27: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation.
    2. Re:marketing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, like all those people with a $100K+ SUV with PSP's and TV's built into them, rotating wheelcaps, booming systems, fridges, bathtubs... I'm sure they'll feel a big social stigma against having a videogame system in their car...

      Come on man, what are you thinking of, 3 piece suit business men, students with a 60's ford of a few 100 bucks? This wouldn't be marketed at people that buy a second hand car, it would be marketed at the people spending more money on 'pimping' their ride then actually buying it, which I believe is the fastest growing market in the automobile industry at the moment.

  28. fortunately its just a concept car by olddotter · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If this were for sale for real, I'd say it was asking for a lawsuit.

  29. Re:OT: Bypassing the /. submission nazis by Stick_Fig · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    I would rate you -1 Retarded if I could.

    Seriously, what the hell does this have to do with anything other than stroking your own personal ego?

    --
    ShortFormBlog: Writing a little. Saying a lot.
  30. Driving is not interactive enough by gooman · · Score: 4, Funny

    Now it might just be me, but when I'm driving I barely have the attention to drink my coffee, talk on the cellphone and shave in the rearview mirror.
    I'm not sure I could devote proper attention to PGR3.
    Of course, you never know until you try.

    --
    "Kittens give Morbo gas!"
    1. Re:Driving is not interactive enough by Anonymous+Monkey · · Score: 1

      It is all an issue of priorities. If you try to drive while talking on the cell phone you will drive badly. But it's easy to talk on the cell phone and play a video game, and it's easy to play a video game and drink coffee, and of course, if you live in So Cal you can drink coffee and drive, after all the "Starbucks Exam" is the most important part of the driving test. Therefore if you have your attention first on your cell phone, then focus on your video game, as long as you are drinking enough coffee you should be able to drive just fine.

      --
      We are the Borg...
  31. scary by POds · · Score: 1

    That sounds scary! You'd hope during driving a glitch doesn't switch from real driving mode the Xbox mode... :}

    --


    Giving IE users a taste of their own medicine since 2005 - http://pods.-is-a-geek.net/
  32. Pretty Much the Same Situation Before BSOD by weston · · Score: 2, Funny

    So, now I can get a blue screen of death while stuck in traffic on the 405

    Even if your car won't move, you probably won't notice for a few hours.

  33. another games... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OMG still no jokes about playing carmageddon while driving? :P

  34. Re:OT: Bypassing the /. submission nazis by CMiYC · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Huh? What the fuck are you talking about in your post? Your post makes almost no sense. The only acrynomn you are missing is WTF.

    There is no question to why your submission hasn't been accepted.

  35. Crazy Taxi! by BigDork1001 · · Score: 2, Funny
    I had a similar experience. The first time I ever played Crazy Taxi was at a local arcade. The machine was one where you sat at it, with a wheel, shifter, brake and gas pedals. I must have played for 3 hours and a lot of money. Having spent all my money I left the arcade, hopped in my car and almost got myself and a few friends killed speeding through the parking lot almost attempting a crazy drift.

    Realizing I was more than likely going to cause an accident I took a moment to recompose myself for the real world and went on my merry way. But for a second there I was definitely a danger to myself and others.

    --
    "Armed forces abroad are of little value unless there is prudent counsel at home" - Cicero
    1. Re:Crazy Taxi! by steveo777 · · Score: 1
      I've had similar experiences after long jaunts at Gran Turismo. Very long jaunts. I would play the first one after high school and on the weekends and any time I could. Then I'd get in my blazing fast 1986 Dodge Omni and try to take corners at unheard of speeds (like 20mph fast). They may have been tiny cars, but after you kill the springs they sit pretty low and can handle a bit better. I'd do what traffic weaving I could on the way to work.

      Then I got a 1994 Honda Accord. It was like driving lightning compared to my first car. I mean, 0-60 in under about 8 seconds (the Omni on good days could accomplish the same feet in no less than double that time). The Accord got me into a lot of trouble.... It's a bit slower now, due to age, but, thankfully, Crazy Taxi and Rouge Trip (PS One) never took their tolls on it.

      --
      This sig isn't original enough, it's time to come up with something witty...
    2. Re:Crazy Taxi! by Crizp · · Score: 1

      Long jaunts of GT is hazardous to your health. I had an old ('83) Benz 230E. While being a rather big and heavy car, it had rear-wheel drive (like Merc and BMW _still_ have, because it's better :) Despite being an automatic, locking the transmission in second gear and skidding up hillside drives, rally style, was my pastime in the winter.

      Good driving practice, that was. I now drive an old Accord 1.6 (again '83) - and now that it's winter, I'm amazed at the road handling of this FF car - I guess the all-around independent McPherson does the trick. It's not bad on the Autobahn either - but won't go faster than 179 KM/h (GPS measured) :)

    3. Re:Crazy Taxi! by steveo777 · · Score: 1

      Yeah... I once had my cruise set on 120Mi/hr (about 190Kph in the good measuring system) for about twenty minutes on an Alabama interstate. I was just passing through, and AL is much more interesting when you don't have time to focus on anything.

      --
      This sig isn't original enough, it's time to come up with something witty...
  36. Most expensive game platform by yellowstone · · Score: 1
    evar

    (btw -- where does /. get its color schemes -- somethingawful?!)

    --
    150 Opening BINARY mode data connection for slashdot.sig (129323052 bytes).
  37. Its coming true by SurfaceMount · · Score: 1, Funny

    Oh no, its coming true.

      If Microsoft made cars:

      1. For no reason whatsoever your car would crash twice a day.

      2. Every time they repainted the lines on the road you would have to
            buy a new car.

      3. Occasionally your car would die on the freeway for no reason,
            and you would just accept this, restart and drive on.

      4. Occasionally, executing a maneuver such as a left turn, would cause
            your car to shut down and refuse to restart, in which case you would
            have to reinstall the engine.

      5. Only one person at a time could use the car, unless you bought
            "Car95" or "CarNT." But then you would have to buy more seats.

      6. Macintosh would make a car that was powered by the sun, reliable,
            five times as fast, and twice as easy to drive, but would only run
            on five per cent of the roads.

      7. The oil, water temperature and alternator warning lights would be
            replaced by a single "general car default" warning light.

      8. New seats would force everyone to have the same size butt.

      9. The airbag system would say "Are you sure?" before going off.

    10. Occasionally for no reason whatsoever, your car would lock you out
            and refuse to let you in until you simultaneously lifted the
            door handle, turned the key, and grab hold of the radio antenna.

    11. GM would require all car buyers to also purchase a deluxe set of
            Rand McNally road maps (now a GM subsidiary), even though they
            neither need them nor want them. Attempting to delete this option
            would immediately cause the car's performance to diminish by 50% or
            more. Moreover, GM would become a target for investigation by the
            Justice Department.

    12. Everytime GM introduced a new model car buyers would have to learn
            how to drive all over again because none of the controls would
            operate in the same manner as the old car.

    13. You'd press the "start" button to shut off the engine.

    1. Re:Its coming true by SpinJaunt · · Score: 1

      it CarNT be true..

      On a side note, when do we see a Linux/NetBSD port?

      --
      /. is good for you.
  38. Re:Ack by User+956 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Sure! Just drive at 100mph head on into a blue wall!

    Hey, not an issue. With that 1 Kilowatt power supply installed, we all know what happens when you hit 88.

    --
    The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
  39. EULAgy by smittyoneeach · · Score: 1

    That copy of the Monopoly "get out of jail free" card in the car's glove box? That was the EULA.

    --
    Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
  40. Lemme guess... by patonw · · Score: 2, Funny

    The engine stalls unless you hang the battery from the hood with string.

  41. Some other work in this area by Samir+Gupta · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I work in the R&D division of a major Japanese video game corporation. Some members of my research group have been working with major Japanese automakers (whose identity I am not at liberty to discuss at the moment) to apply concepts learned in video game design to driving cars. Instead of a cumbersome set of multiple controls, we are experimenting with a single two-axis controller, one axis controlling acceleration and braking in the up-down direction, and the other controlling steering in the left-right direction. Gear shifting is mapped to the start and select buttons. We're experimenting with a number of control devices, from the Power Glove to GameCube controllers as input effectors.

    We believe that this research will lead to much more drivable and intuitively controllable autos, especially for a generation of drivers raised on video games, and will cause fewer accidents on the road, due to the intuitive nature of the control mechanisms and the ingrained neurological psycho-response actuations which have developed from extensive game playing. It will further open up driving to those who may not have all limbs working, but as long as one has thumb control, driving will be accessible to all. I look forward to seeing this coming revolution on the commericial market.

    --
    -- Samir Gupta, Ph. D. Head, New Technology Research Group, Nintendo Co. Ltd., Kyoto, Japan.
    1. Re:Some other work in this area by slashdotmsiriv · · Score: 0, Troll

      Instead of a cumbersome set of multiple controls, we are experimenting with a single two-axis controller, one axis controlling acceleration and braking in the up-down direction, and the other controlling steering in the left-right direction. Gear shifting is mapped to the start and select buttons. We're experimenting with a number of control devices, from the Power Glove to GameCube controllers as input effectors. Do you mean you are experimenting with driving a car using a joystick? And how many of you "researchers" will it take until you realize that the so called "two-axis" however you call it driving system is not intuitive? Come on dude, you are either somebody falsely claiming to work in the gaming industry or you guys are totally in the wrong research direction. Just ask yourself how many gamers would rather play Project Gotham using standard wheel and pedal controllers than the lame default joypad and joysticks.

    2. Re:Some other work in this area by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Instead of a cumbersome set of multiple controls, we are
      > experimenting with a single two-axis controller, one axis
      > controlling acceleration and braking in the up-down direction,
      > and the other controlling steering in the left-right
      > direction.

      Wow, you re-invented the joystick. Brings back some good old C64 memories. Of course they are only good because we didn't have any better back then.

      Any gamer that has tried knows that buying a wheel and pedals is the most important improvement you could ever get in you NFS lap times. Hell, I'd choose the good old 4 finger salute over a joystick any day when it comes to controlling a virtual car. The joystick is about the worst controller ever invented for anything that requires simultaneous speed and direction control.

    3. Re:Some other work in this area by Bucc5062 · · Score: 1

      "We believe that this research will lead to much more drivable and intuitively controllable autos, especially for a generation of drivers raised on video games, and will cause fewer accidents on the road, due to the intuitive nature of the control mechanisms and the ingrained neurological psycho-response actuations which have developed from extensive game playing."

      That's a heck of a statement. I would not not completely disagree, but I would question whether using a joystick type control or wheel would make any difference in the number of accidents on the road. The best most intuative system on the road will not replace judgement. if I press a pedal, or squeeze a trigger, going to fast will screw up my day either from a ticket or a hard object. What _may_ reeduce accidents is some enhanced computer control that can take over to avoid a potential accident, voice activated warnings (similar to airplane cockpit warnings) when conditions warrant, or better driving education.

      Driving is *not* a game and just because one sits in front of a screen and gains good hand-eye coordinations does nothing to make him/her/it a better driver. Now, if your company designed a video game that taught good driving habits...no wait...that would be bbbooorrriiinnggg.

      --
      Life is a great ride, the vehicle doesn't matter
  42. It could be really cool by Feanturi · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is a cool car to have if you love racing/driving games, because you've got a car that you'd need to have anyway, plus the most awesome driving game controller. I don't know about you, but a wheel clamped to my desk and a block with pedals on it while sitting in a swivel chair doesn't quite do it. Here you totally feel like being in a car because you really are in one. Next thing to do with this would be to have it so the windows could actually go opaque with a 360 display of the game environment. Maybe it could watch your head move too, and adjust the view accordingly, to give the illusion of depth more realism...

    I see a major problem with this scenario though. If the game's physics allow a handicap for lesser driving skill, you could get yourself into trouble with muscle memory. Game on. You're in your car, experiencing speeding down a winding mountain road, pulling sharp curves at high speed and everything's going just fine. You used to crash a lot on this course but you've got it down now, good. Turn off the game, all you've done is switched perceptions of realities. You start driving again, but now real physics are involved. You're still at the same set of controls. You've 'learned' what those controls can do, everything still feels the same way to you in most ways. You feel that you 'know' what this vehicle is capable of. This is potentially a huge problem. A shame, because it would be so cool to have a car like that.

    The game would have to strive to be as realistic as possible, tied into what that car is really capable of, tire wear and all, anticipating every possible stress and vector and appropriate consequences, with no 'beginner' setting of any kind. Otherwise you'd safely be able to learn some pretty dangerous habits.

    1. Re:It could be really cool by DavidV · · Score: 1

      "sitting in a swivel chair doesn't quite do it"

      That's the reason I sit in a rather uncomfortable, but very stable old chair with very little padding at my PC. It makes driving so much better, a friend who used to be into driving simulations used to swear by his padded swivel chair, but I think that is one of the reasons he is becoming less interested in driving sims (GT Legends, GTR and Richard Burns Rally are my current favourites).

      --
      !sig
    2. Re:It could be really cool by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Personally, I made a swivel chair out of a Nissan 240SX (1989) seat.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  43. And in other news... by tverbeek · · Score: 4, Funny
    And in other news, Smith & Wesson and Sony have announced the development of a handgun which shoots live ammunition, but can also be used as a controller in first-person-shooter games.

    Nintendo and Acme Sex Toys have scheduled a press conference for tomorrow, but are keeping hush-hush about their joint hardware/gaming venture, except to confirm that it would likely be rated "A" (for adults only).

    --
    http://alternatives.rzero.com/
  44. Just what we need... by Kickboy12 · · Score: 2, Funny

    blue screen on the dashboard!

  45. Already beat to it. by SeaFox · · Score: 1

    Look! It's another example of Microsoft innovating.

  46. results are in by hostingreviews · · Score: 1

    Instead of finding a way to get the car to the desk they took the desk to the car. That's just... typical!

  47. Re:Some issues... by pnewhook · · Score: 2, Informative
    If the engine is off you are running off of just the battery (belts run the alternator, alternator only runs when engine runs). So the engine would HAVE to be on.
    Huh? Why can't the game run off of battery alone?
    I am not too sure how good it is on your brakes to continualy pump them
    Car is entirely drive by wire. Pumping the brake pedal while the engine is off doesn't do anything to the physical brakes.
    --
    Tesla was a genius. Edison however was a overrated hack who liked to torture puppies.
  48. Destruction Derby by CrazyJim1 · · Score: 2, Funny

    The goal is to make a split second decision on how to t-bone someone. So I play for many hours, and on the drive home I almost make a decision to drive into this guy backing out of his driveway. Threeeeee-Sixtay!

  49. I for one by skeptictank · · Score: 1

    welcome our preteen backseat driver overlords... is this gonna make my insurance go up?

  50. Interesting... by oman_ · · Score: 1

    The Nissan 350Z that I'm working with right now allows me to read the steering wheel position, brake pedal pressure, and gas pedal position in realtime via the diagnostics port. In fact.. you can even purchase the software to do it yourself! *plug* *plug* :) http://www.uprev.com/products/cipher_z_g.html

    Converting this into controller input as a USB hid device or PS2 controller input would be trivial... in fact I'm tempted to go and try and get Gran Turismo running on it... I'll put a projector out in the garage ;)

    Would anyone actually use this if I provided some schematics/software?

    FYI: I believe the car must be equipped with the VDC (Vehicle Dynamic Control)
      in order to have a steering wheel position sensor that can be read from.

    --
    Rats would be more funny if they could fart.
    1. Re:Interesting... by Akdor+1154 · · Score: 1

      Can this work in reverse? i.e. Could you set up a controller to send instructions that replace those of the steering wheel/pedals? MIB 2 was a shithouse movie, but that car controller sure was a good idea...

  51. translucent lcd windshield? by keith134 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    as long as they're spending the $$$ to put a game system in the car, why not just add to the realism and make the entire windshield into an LCD panel

  52. 7" LCD?? by jadin · · Score: 1

    This really doesn't impress me. A 7" LCD is all you get to look at while you play? When I read the title the first thing that came to mind was a giant screen filling the windshield, the rear window, modified rear-view mirrors, the works.

    That would impress me, this doesn't.

    1. Re:7" LCD?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it's any consolation, the LCD has a "Type R" sticker on it. And a blue LED.

    2. Re:7" LCD?? by Loconut1389 · · Score: 1

      my thoughts exactly. I looked around before posting it myself and getting a -1 redundant.

      What I've always wanted, more than a full cockpit flight simulator, was a fully drive by wire car with a nice heavy duty fighter jet joystick. Push forward to accelerate, centered maintains speed, pull back to decelerate. Have a non-linear scale so its faster accel/decel as you get into the last 1/3 of the travel range, but be nice and gentle within the middle. I hate having to have my hands up on the wheel and usually find myself with one arm resting on my lap gripping the bottom of the wheel. I think I'd have a lot more control with a nice joystick setup. As a consolation prize until this is possible, I wish I could have a speed based throttle on my steering wheel- eg set by MPH instead of by fuel rate.

      Oh well, I'll keep dreaming, but yeah, I'd rather have either of those things than a nifty gaming system on a dinky 7" lcd.

  53. Race is on! by Stan+Vassilev · · Score: 1

    Every pedestrian you hit gives you 10 points.

    Hmmm, that's weird, the XBox360 is turned off, where are those pedestrians coming from?

  54. Wiat until Boeing and MS do Flight Simulator ... by joelsanda · · Score: 2, Funny

    eom

    --
    The Luddites were ahead of their time.
  55. So.... by Audacious · · Score: 1

    Does this mean that the guy from GM was a prophet?

    --
    Someone put a black hole in my pocket and now I'm broke. :-)
  56. I remember the time when the best part of the car by FerretFrottage · · Score: 1

    ...was the backseat. Of course the flip down LCD could be used for other entertainment I suppose---Allll Right Giggity giggity

    --
    "Look Lois, the two symbols of the Republican Party: an elephant, and a fat white guy who is threatened by change."
  57. Re:OT: Bypassing the /. submission nazis by merc · · Score: 1

    The article wasn't about me, you fucking asshole.

    --
    It's true no man is an island, but if you take a bunch of dead guys and tie 'em together, they make a good raft.
  58. Or Vice-Versa.. by Junta · · Score: 1

    Yes, pedal to the floor turning into a banked turn when suddenly the car decides to use that as actual input and your garage gets screwed..

    I know, engine would have to start and all and thus this scenario is less likely to proceed all the way through without driver notice, but a fun thought.

    --
    XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  59. I'm with you.... by Belial6 · · Score: 1

    I am a firm believer human's ability to understanding the difference between pretend and real, but this would be a little like playing with an unloaded gun.

  60. When fiction becomes reality... by kahanamoku · · Score: 1

    Lucky its only PGR3 and not Grand Theft Auto 3!

    --
    ----- Concentrate on promoting more than demoting.
  61. If you dont like my driving, stay off the sidewalk by digitaldc · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now you can play Burnout 3 in your car AND on the road simultaneously. A lifelong desire fullfilled.

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
  62. It's all fun and games... by Old+Man+Kensey · · Score: 1

    Somewhere online this very idea was being discussed years ago and someone made a comment like "It's all fun and games until you think you're playing Grand Theft Auto but you really just killed 4 pedestrians." Damn, I wish I could find the original quote.

    --
    -- Old Man Kensey
  63. Better Idea by WOSSquee · · Score: 1

    What about a car with a LCD screen that was hooked up to a camera behind the car? And instead of using the steering wheel, you control the car with a PS2 controller? How cool would that be? You'd be able to change the view to see behind the car and everything!

  64. Amazing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So extremely cool, yet so supremely stupid. What splendid dichotomies this varied world provides!

  65. haha, good ole' slashdot by I'm+Don+Giovanni · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is something that most geeks would think quite cool, but because Microsoft is involved, this thread is filled with negative comments. Oh, it's too dangerous!! Good grief...

    --
    -- "I never gave these stories much credence." - HAL 9000
    1. Re:haha, good ole' slashdot by NaruVonWilkins · · Score: 1

      Guess what company I work for? IT'S TOO DANGEROUS.

  66. Red lights are gonna suck... by neomunk · · Score: 1

    You're gonna think this is a bad dea the first time you're at a long red light and the guy in front of you switches off the car, and switches on the game. Some people are so self important that I don't think it's a stretch to imagine someone saying to himself "oh, they can sit there for another minute or so, I'm on the last lap" or some obnoxiousness.

  67. bicycle/pedestrian environment processing by whookey · · Score: 1

    I've never played "Project Gotham Racing 3". Does it provide force feedback which gives the player the perception of the shards remaining of their driver's side window entering their teeth as a result of its' interaction with my U-lock as I ride by anyone gaming while operating an internal combustion weapon on the street? The empire may want to implement virtual and/or actual U-lock/window collision detection.

    --
    somebody bent my whookey.
  68. Can you still get a DUI? by Albinoman · · Score: 2, Funny

    Could you get a DUI for playing video games in your car while drunk?

    1. Re:Can you still get a DUI? by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

      In the UK you are "driving" if you are sat in the driving seat with the keys in the ignition, i.e. in control of the vehicle.

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    2. Re:Can you still get a DUI? by schiefaw · · Score: 1
      In the UK you are "driving" if you are sat in the driving seat with the keys in the ignition, i.e. in control of the vehicle.

      Same in the US.
      --
      Angleyne: You can't bend that girder - it's unbendable! Bender: Well I don't know anything about lifting, so that ju
    3. Re:Can you still get a DUI? by Eldonv · · Score: 1

      A friend of mine once got a DUI for sleeping in his vehicle with the keys in his pocket.

    4. Re:Can you still get a DUI? by F_Scentura · · Score: 1

      In the US, as long as the key's in the car with you.

  69. Uh.. Bad idea? by Sp00nMan · · Score: 1

    If I'm not mistaken, sitting in a turned off car and using the gas is going to lead to a seriously flooded engine. Nice when mommy comes back from the grocery store to find her kid has stalled out the car by playing the xbox360!

    1. Re:Uh.. Bad idea? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that only applies to carburated engines. Fuel injectors require electricity to fire.

      secondly, newer drive by wire vehicles have no mechanical linkage between the throttle and the gas pedal.

  70. I pity those poor suckers on the freeway. by 2e · · Score: 1, Funny

    Gas break honk. Gas break honk. Honk honk punch. Gas gas gas.
    -HS

  71. Developer Liability Insurance? by ytr · · Score: 1
    the Nissan URGE concept car allows drivers (while parked) to play 'Project Gotham Racing 3'

    'while parked' only huh?

    The developers better make sure it is impossible to play the game whilst driving. If someone is killed or injured by someone driving a car fitted with this, lawyer heaven - the developers better take out some damn good liability insurance.

  72. Does it? by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

    I've never found that ABS feels any different, right up to the point where it actually starts to do some work. One thing I have been caught out by is ABS units that don't require a vacuum servo - all the braking assistance is done by an electric pump on the ABS unit. When you're towing a car with that kind of ABS unit, you get just as good brakes as if the engine was running. Great for snapping towropes.

    1. Re:Does it? by RESPAWN · · Score: 1

      I think some people may feel that it kicks in too early in some situations, or that they don't have as good a braking feel at the limits - it's had to modulate the brakes once ABS has taken over. The other factor to consider is that ABS on different cars works very differently. The ABS on my 2003 Honda feels much, much more violent than the ABS on the '88 M3 I drove.

      That said, I also know people who disable their ABS on their cars. A friend of mine owns a 2003 WRX. At one autocross ABS kept kicking in on his car when approaching one particular turn, making it harder for him to trail brake into the corner and rotate the car. I pointed out that there were some bumps on the outside of the corner and that the bumps were probably causing his ABS to activate. I pointed out that I had actually been taking a wider line with the CRX I was driving in order to purposely hit those bumps and induce a drift into the corner in order to better point the car towards the corner exit. We pulled his ABS fuse and he managed to shave a full second off his time. Sure, the outside rear wheel locked up for a split second when braking into the corner, but not enough to cause abnormal behavior of the car. Now he pulls his ABS fuse for every race.

      That said, when it comes to the streets with other people and other cars around, I think that ABS is generally a good thing that needs to be on all cars. 99% of drivers can benefit from the use of ABS on their cars in panic situations. This includes myself and just about everybody else I know. I still get annoyed from time to time whenever the sometimes overzealous ABS kicks in on my Honda, but I am always glad that its there when I need it.

      --

      If Murphy's Law can go wrong, it will.

    2. Re:Does it? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      That said, when it comes to the streets with other people and other cars around, I think that ABS is generally a good thing that needs to be on all cars. 99% of drivers can benefit from the use of ABS on their cars in panic situations. This includes myself and just about everybody else I know.

      Amen to that. ALL CARS SHOULD COME WITH ABS AND TRACTION CONTROL. If you know what you're doing, and you need to disable them, you can do so.

      In fact, if you want to spend a little (or a lot of) money, you can build or buy controllers for ABS and TC, so you can adjust them. That's pretty useful, too.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:Does it? by RESPAWN · · Score: 1

      In reality, I would place stability control/yaw control/whatever else the manufacturers want to call it above traction control. Strictly speaking, traction control on measures slippage on the drive wheels and moves to control that. Stability control measures the yaw of a vehicle and moves to keep the vehicle from spinning or sliding out of control.

      I think within the next 5 to 10 years we'll see these technologies present on almost all new cars, except for only the cheapest econoboxes on the road. These technologies are already making their way into more and more of the midrange cars. It's only a matter of years before the technology becomes cheap enough to implement on the cheaper, compact cars on the road, just like how AC is included standard on pretty much every car produced for America.

      On the subject of do-it-yourself controllers, myself and a few friends were considering building a homemade TC unit for a buddy's car. We figured that with our combined knowledge of computers, electronics, and control systems and a little research, we could have come up with a device to make his launches more consistent, as well as make the car easier to handle on the streets (it was a street/drag/occasional autocross car).

      In the end, I got a real job, the EE in the group went out of country for a few months, and the computer engineer got a girlfriend. So much for that idea.

      --

      If Murphy's Law can go wrong, it will.

  73. Re:OT: Bypassing the /. submission nazis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're posting retarded just-about-spam messages...about spamming.

    Way to fucking go, dipshit.

  74. You must WORSHIP the CAR by dangitman · · Score: 1

    Blessed be the gasoline. I think this is just a sign of things to come. In the future, the term "hybrid" car will mean something very different than it does today. We will merge with our cars. No more uncomfortable seats and lack of legroom. No clumsy user interfaces like steering wheels. We will become the car. Who needs bipedal motion when you can get a V8? Sex will involve simply docking in the car-hole.

    --
    ... and then they built the supercollider.
  75. Say "while," dammit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's "while" not "whilst!" Saying "whilst" makes you sound like a pedantic fool.

    1. Re:Say "while," dammit by ytr · · Score: 1

      'whilst' is perfect English, and you, sir, are perfectly vulgar - your profanity should read 'damn it'.

  76. 6 Hours of use from the battery! by Warfire · · Score: 1

    The Xbox 360 pulls 160 Watts of power: http://forums.xbox-scene.com/index.php?showtopic=4 66036. The average car (or deep cycle, which would be a good idea for this use) battery fully charges at 100 amp hours, providing 12V. Which is 1200 Watt Hours.

    Therefore your Xbox 360 will run for 7.5 hours just on battery charge.

    Looking at an in car LCD screen, http://www.xenarc.com/product/700y.html 8 Watts seems reasonable for an LCD screen. This brings operating time down to about 7 hours.

    Assuming that 200 Watt Hours would want to be left in the car as a way to start it and provide heating etc, that gives us 1000 Watt Hours to power the Xbox and about 6 hours of game play.

    God help the condition of the battery if they don't use a deep cycle battery but it could work.

    -
    Peter

    1. Re:6 Hours of use from the battery! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Actually, you need a lot more than 1/6 of the battery's potential to start the car. A car battery is considered fully discharged at 12.15 volts and fully charged at 12.65. Many cars won't even engage the starter under about 11 volts to avoid burning out the starter. P = VI, and if V drops, I has to go up to keep P constant, which means you can burn out wires due to overamperage which in turn is due to undervoltage. This happens in household wiring too, and explains why brownouts kill things like light bulbs and PC power supplies.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  77. "Vanishing Point" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I worked at a drive-in theater when the movie Vanishing Point was new (yes, I'm a geezer).

    When most movies let out, folks drove out slowly. When Vanishing Point was over there must have been half a ton of gravel in the air as people spun tires getting out of there.

    I'll bet the local cops wrote a lot of speeding tickets that week.

    Botton line: you're right. I hope they never actually produce one of those things; there must be some incredibly stupid, selfish people at Nissan (we all know about Microsoft...)

  78. Re:OT: Bypassing the /. submission nazis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You post something obviously offtopic, and the first sentence in your post reads "I know I'll be modded off topic for this...", and then you get angry when people mod your post as Off Topic? Nice.

    I'm posting this as AC only because I've already modded other posts on this story.

  79. aww man by crashelite · · Score: 1

    my car over heated damnit.... oh wait nop it was only the Xbox... i cant wait till people complain it drains their battarie too fast also

    --
    (yes i know i suck at spelling fell free to correct my grammar and/or spellin i dont care, im still not going to change
  80. Why you have to be parked... by briancnorton · · Score: 1

    This has nothing to do with safety. It is because the heat of the running car would otherwise cause your 360 to melt and crash.

    --

    People who think they know everything really piss off those of us that actually do.

    1. Re:Why you have to be parked... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This has nothing to do with safety. It is because the heat of the running car would otherwise cause your 360 to melt and crash.



      Why would the heat of the running car matter? I thought the 360 did that on its own.
  81. Drive-by-wire not new by Yankel · · Score: 1

    This isn't new at all.

    No physical connection between the pedal and the brake.. Nothing could possibly go wrong

    --
    --- Dan
  82. Is fly-by-wire legal by PhotoGuy · · Score: 1

    Are there any approved fly-by-wire car systems today? Even if my power steering, power brakes, and other goodies go out on a modern car, the mechanical linkages still work, providing a high degree of safety that wouldn't be present in a pure fly-by-wire system.

    I'm surprised such a thing can be legal.

    --
    Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
  83. Just hope the car doesn't overheat and crash too. by elrous0 · · Score: 1
    State Trooper: Poor bastard, he should have never put that power brick on carpet.

    -Eric

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  84. Technology and Gaming? by Sottilde · · Score: 1

    Who the hell would say that "Gaming" is an important attribute in their first car? That's like saying that "aerodynamics" is an important attribute of your next video game.

  85. Controller failure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know how one can go through PS2 controllers, and while your car hardware MAY be more sturdy than that, how much wear are you going to put on things playing Burnout 3 on your Nisson?

  86. Available in Japan already by CarpetShark · · Score: 1

    Video games have been available for cars in Japan for years now, unless the short clips on TV mislead me as to its the popularity there. They're sometimes stuck in traffic for hours each day, so it does make some sense I guess.

    Anyway. If Nissan are sharing a joint vision with MS now, then I can scratch them from the list of companies I'll buy from.

  87. drive by wire by Oldsmobile · · Score: 1

    Actually, this drive-by-wire thing is in trouble. Mercedes Benz anounced it would stop building Mercs with it's brake-by-wire system, as people didn't like them and didn't trust them.

    The problem is, drive-by-wire controls, for them to be safe, should have redundancy. That redudancy makes them an expensive option and the benefit gained is minimal.

    --
    Some say he is made with ascii, others that he is eyeballed daily by millions. All we know is, he is known as the Sig
  88. Re:Ack by C0rinthian · · Score: 1

    just close all the windows, turn off the car, start it back up, and open the windows again. That should fix ya.

  89. It's been done before by Brian+Kendig · · Score: 1

    The first "fully integrated gaming system within a vehicle" ... The Nissan URGE concept car allows drivers (while parked) to play 'Project Gotham Racing 3' using the car's own steering wheel, gas pedal and brake pedal while viewing the game on a flip-down seven-inch LCD screen.

    It's been done. Google for Namco's Ridge Racer Full Scale. This arcade game played Ridge Racer on a triple-wide projection screen and had its steering, gas, brake, clutch, and gearshift connected to a Mazda Miata. Braking in the game even lit up the car's brakelights.

  90. Steer by Wire by sbohmann · · Score: 1

    One seems to forget that no real car will ever be steered by wire. It is a concept that simply doesn't work in practice. The reason is, to regain the safety of mechanical steering, four (4) independent actors with 2 x 2 indepentent power sources would be needed. This is not a thing that matters much in jet airplanes, simply because of their dimensions, but which is definitely impractical in a car. Even for Lorries, it's too much, also because it simply isn't necessary. The forces one has to handle when flying an A-329 are huge. But even a 35 ton Lorry could theoretically steered without servo support. And luckily, whenever the servo fails, it remains steerable. Good old mechanics simply work and are the fundament of all technical security execept in computing. Low tech rules. P.S. the point here is, that without SBW, one couldn't practically use the steering wheel as an input device.

    1. Re:Steer by Wire by sbohmann · · Score: 1

      not technical security, but safety, of course.

      and i should finally get used to using html tags for formatting...

  91. Finally! by martinultima · · Score: 1

    A car with something more dangerous inside than a cell phone or a drunk driver!

    --
    Creative misinterpretation is your friend.