Slashdot Mirror


Solar Energy Becoming More Pervasive

TheUploader writes "RenewableEnergyAccess is reporting that Solatec LLC has released a stick-on solar panel kit that charges your hybrid while parked. In related news, the world's largest photovoltaic system will be built, not on the roofs of Priuses, but on the ground of Nevada, and will provide clean energy for the US military."

484 comments

  1. How to market!? by JDSalinger · · Score: 5, Informative

    The Prius has an MSRP of $21,725. At 10% the cost of the car, the solar panel kit ($2,195) seems like a reasonable deal, considering it facilitates 10% better gas mileage. At 55 mpg, the gas cost to drive 200,000 miles (at $2.20/gallon) is $8,000. At 60 mpg, the gas cost to drive 200,000 miles (at $2.20/gallon) is $7,333. The difference is $666. Considering the kit costs over three times what the gas savings amount to, it is hard to market on account of good money-sense. The only consolation is the concept of helping mother nature. I have limited understanding of the fabrication process of the solar panels, so it would be hard to say whether or not mother nature profits from this scenario.

    1. Re:How to market!? by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "The Prius has an MSRP of $21,725."

      Yeah...but, it looks like CRAP. Can't they make these 'green' cars look nice and sporty?

      If they could make a hybrid car of some type with 0-60mph speeds and looks comparable to say a Vette or something..I'd be interested.

      Till then...I'm not interested. Gas prices aren't that big a deal to me...my last car was a little european car that only got 10 mpg before Katrina killed it (RIP).

      It looked great and had performance, and that's what matters to me. I'd hope that the hybrid car designers would start marketing to those who care what a car looks like and does on the road.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    2. Re:How to market!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And the Corolla has an MSRP of $14,105. At 40 mpg, it's gonna cost you $11,000 to get the same 200,000 miles out of it. Sure it's $3,000 more on gas, but you're coming out $7,620 ahead on the cost of the vehicle. Why buy a hybrid at all, then?

    3. Re:How to market!? by sonofagunn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Now factor in rising gas prices and resale value...

    4. Re:How to market!? by The+Fun+Guy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That assumption of 200,000 miles is over the entire life of the car, right? At 20K/yr, this is roughly ten years. Will the photovoltaic panel continue to provide energy at the same efficiency over 10 years? Doubtful. Solar panels degrade in efficiency over time, maybe by as much as 10% per year.

      In the first year, that $2200 kit will save you a whopping $66, assuming that the manufacturer's claims are accurate. You would do better to put that $2200 in a savings account earning 3% and use the interest ($66) to pay for the extra gasoline. Repeat that for 10 years and you'll be no worse off from the amount of money you spent on gas, plus you'll have $2200 in the bank instead of a 10-year old photovoltaic rig.

      --
      The man who does not read good books has no advantage over the man who cannot read them. - Mark Twain
    5. Re:How to market!? by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yeah...but, it looks like CRAP. Can't they make these 'green' cars look nice and sporty?

      They hit the economy car segment first, because that is where is is marketable as a gas saving feature. For sports cars, however, you'll be seeing hybrids very soon from a number of different manufacturers and they will be very, very fast to accelerate off the line, given the benefits of stable power at the low end of the spectrum. Toyota and Mitsubishi's concept demos this year seemed particularly nice.

    6. Re:How to market!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even at $4.50/gal, the Corolla owner is coming out ahead, and they're driving a car that looks significantly less retarded. Resale value? Don't Toyota owners take perverse pride in driving their cars until they fall apart?

    7. Re:How to market!? by dotpavan · · Score: 1

      atleast it is less polluting, 1 good reason to switch? thats why at some places, Govt./employer give tax exemptions/benefits for using hybrid vehicles

    8. Re:How to market!? by iezhy · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah...but, it looks like CRAP. Can't they make these 'green' cars look nice and sporty?

      check out this one before you say that again..

    9. Re:How to market!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The difference is $666
      and so the prophecy of the end of days begins...

    10. Re:How to market!? by AdamWeeden · · Score: 1

      Rising gas prices I'll give you, but even if gas prices double in the time it takes to rack up 200K miles, you're still coming out ahead. As far as resale value, that's hard to predict. It's difficult to say what the resale value for the hybrids that have only been out a year or two will be. The Corolla, on the other hand, holds a lot of it's value historically, so the hybrid would have to hold CONSIDERABLE value (which is unlikely to happen as new tech like this tends to have a few parts that are not designed for high lifetime).

      --
      I was quoted out of context in my autobiography...
    11. Re:How to market!? by CastrTroy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why are people even buying cars in the first place? If you city has good public transit, you could take the bus back and forth to work each day, and rent a car for the weekends for less then the price of owning a car. $15 a day to rent a car, plus $15 a day for insurance, that's $30 a day, times 8 days for weekends in a month, and you at $240 a month. That covers insurance, and your car. You'd never have to pay for repairs, and you'd never have to worry about your car breaking down. You probably don't even need a car every weekend, so your costs go down. If you just rented a car every time you really needed to use a car, you'd probably spend a lot less. I realize that some people need to commute long distances to get to work, but there's plenty of people who don't. If you don't need your car to get back and forth to work every day, you probably don't need a car at all.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    12. Re:How to market!? by BeerMilkshake · · Score: 1

      How many people have owned a Prius long enough to have to replace the batteries?

      I hear the batteries last several years, but they cost thousands of dollars to replace. Prius owners will end up buying their car several times over.

      And, consider the environmental damage that comes from having to dispose of the used batteries. Even 'recycling' the materials takes energy and costs money.

    13. Re:How to market!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe for you and your hairy legged granola eating girlfriends. But not for the the average Joe America. Especially when tax benfits hardly justify the costs.

    14. Re:How to market!? by smittyoneeach · · Score: 1

      So, I should by a crap heap just to avoid the charge of 'superficiality'?
      What a shallow premise.

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    15. Re:How to market!? by butterwise · · Score: 0

      "The difference is $666."

      The number of the beast... I think there is something more going on here than better gas mileage.

      --
      If a baby duck is a "duckling," why would anyone want to eat "dumplings?"
    16. Re:How to market!? by deathy_epl+ccs · · Score: 1

      The difference is $666

      I think we see now why high fuel efficiency is the work of the Devil.

    17. Re:How to market!? by kfg · · Score: 1

      I have limited understanding of the fabrication process of the solar panels, so it would be hard to say whether or not mother nature profits from this scenario.

      At least you are perspicacious enough to understand this is an issue.
      That alone puts you well ahead of the field. Beware of marketing claims and do your homework before you buy.

      KFG

    18. Re:How to market!? by skintigh2 · · Score: 1

      People will buy it for the same reason they buy a Prius: not because it has a good long term cost/benefits ratio, but because it's the right thing to do. Not just for the environment, but for our reliance on terrorist-funding oil.

      I have heard myths that solar panels take more energy to construct than they produce in their lifetime, but if that were true the typical solar panel factory would need several Hoover Damns next door. So I will ASSUME the environment comes out ahead. But I am no manufacturing engineer, so for all I know they are made out of baby seals.

    19. Re:How to market!? by Rei · · Score: 1

      Yeah, if you want a manual transmission with no features.

      Have you ever been inside a Prius? I was really impressed ;) They're neat little things. Heck, the prius's gasoline engine has almost as much hp as the Corolla's engine, and it has the electric engine to go along with it. Unlike Corolla, it comes with antilock brakes, turnoff airbags, cruise control, power locks, and power windows. How much do you think that will cost you on the Corolla? The Prius even has more legroom and a digital info display. The one that I saw started with an electronic key and the engine was controlled with buttons - it felt more like a PC than a car ;)

      --
      It's time for Operation Crazy Plan.
    20. Re:How to market!? by afidel · · Score: 2, Informative

      Toyota has designed the battery pack of the Prius to be totally recyclable. Also the battery pack is covered under warrenty for 8 years 100,000 miles

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    21. Re:How to market!? by syphax · · Score: 1

      PV is not yet cost-effective with anything, so it's no surprise that this kit is not cost-effective. People will buy it because it's neat and they'll feel good about themselves. The same reasons that (other) people buy kick-ass car stereos or leather seats.

      At present, hybrids are largely fashion items. They are not particularly cost-effective, and at current volumes, will not appreciably change oil consumption anywhere. Both of these things may very well change. Toyota (they are, by the way, eating other automakers' lunch, globally) is smart. Their hybrid investment is paying off both for R&D and marketing.

      --
      Simple Unexpected Concrete Credible Emotional Stories
    22. Re:How to market!? by soft_guy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Why are people even buying cars in the first place? If you city has good public transit, you could take the bus back and forth to work each day, and rent a car for the weekends for less then the price of owning a car.

      Many people do not live in such a city. Also, even if you live in a place with public transit, it is unlikely that it will go where you want to go when you need to get there. One place I lived had "public transit" (bus), but I had to drive a mile to get to the nearest bus stop. Even then, it took me about 3X longer to get to work than if I had driven my car. The only reason I didn't drive to work was the parking cost was too high where I worked.

      Then I moved to another place where I could take a different kind of public transit to work - ferry boat. I could walk from the boat to work, but on the other side of the water I had to drive 30 minutes to get to the boat. No bus was available and even if it had been it would have been too inconvienient.

      In my experience public transit works only in a few cities and for a few people in those cities. Plus, public transit is as expensive as a car (or more), very dirty, very crowded, and very likely to screw you and leave you stranded. If you are 30 seconds late, you are screwed. Oh, I can't get to work today because there is a strike. Or a bomb threat. Or a holiday. Oops, we changed our schedule from the fall schedule to the summer schedule today and now you cant' get home. Your fault for not reading some fine print.

      Bah! I will never vote for public transit and I avoid it when I can (which is most of the time.)

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
    23. Re:How to market!? by dlZ · · Score: 1

      But I am no manufacturing engineer, so for all I know they are made out of baby seals.

      This made me laugh and get strange looks from everyone around me. Something about that line just struck me as hilarious.

      --
      rm -rf ./evidence @ punkcomp
    24. Re:How to market!? by Carnivore · · Score: 1

      If you city has good public transit

      That's the thing, though. I live in Gainesville, FL, which actually has public transportation, and it still sucks. I use my bicycle to commute, which takes 15 minutes. The bus ride is 45. The buses are late, slow, crowded, and many routes stop running in the early evening. The buses as a car replacement is just not feasible for most people, especially because there's no bus service to the airport, which is where the car rental offices are.

      I'd love it if we had reliable, clean mass transit. We don't, though, so most people buy cars.

    25. Re:How to market!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do not doubt for one second that many would by a Prius just for the neat electronic doohickeys or the obvious environmental reasons. But as a purely economic or aesthetic decision, it makes no sense.

    26. Re:How to market!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure that there are consumers out there that buy hybrids for green reasons, and by green I'm not referring to the color of cash. Purchasing a hybrid creates an indication to the industry that some consumers are willing to pay more for environmentally-friendly products (insofar as a car can be). The Corolla is also a great gas-conserving machine, but purchasing that does not make the same statement to the industry.
      Hopefully, the statement will also help develop hybrid technology. Hybrid technology could be reused even in a switch to hydrogen.

    27. Re:How to market!? by Rei · · Score: 1

      10% a year

      I've seen panels from the '70s that run at around 50% power, and I seriously doubt that modern panels degrade faster. Do you have a cite?

      --
      It's time for Operation Crazy Plan.
    28. Re:How to market!? by CreatureComfort · · Score: 1


      Not to mention resale value on hybrids is gonna be pathetic.

      When is someone going to want to get rid of their hybrid, just before or just after they have to replace ~$5,000 worth of batteries? Especially when that battery replacement is going to be required in the same 3-5 year period that most people buy a new vehicle in. Think about it. Do you put new tires on the car you are selling, or leave the old worn out ones on, knowing that the cost of new tires will be more than you can increase the resale price for?

      Expect to see a slew of used hybrids hit the market in 2008-2010 with worn out batteries that will cost unsuspecting buyers an extra 25%-50% over purchase price to keep running.

      --
      "Unheard of means only it's undreamed of yet,
      Impossible means not yet done." ~~ Julia Ecklar
    29. Re:How to market!? by Rei · · Score: 1

      Energy payback times on solar panels are often cited at around 5 years, but it's dropping all the time. I believe that some on the market now are as low as 1 1/2 years.

      Of course, energy payback isn't the only issue. Does anyone have any idea how polluting the manufacturing process is?

      --
      It's time for Operation Crazy Plan.
    30. Re:How to market!? by taniwha · · Score: 4, Informative

      can't agree more - my prius will drag just about anyone from a standing start, especially on a hill - it's that high torque electric motor that does it - instant power you just don't get from an gas engine without trashing your clutch

    31. Re:How to market!? by Rei · · Score: 1

      Are you going to compare it to a car with an automatic transmission and equivalent convenience features or not? The comparison with the Corolla was flawed because they were not equivalent vehicles. It's akin to arguing that buying a Corolla is idiodic when you can buy a more efficient moped for much less money.

      --
      It's time for Operation Crazy Plan.
    32. Re:How to market!? by cayenne8 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      "But your bit about performance is bunk. The Honda Accord hybrid is one of the fastest sedans out there."

      Well....what exactly is the 0-60 mph of the Honda Accord? That's what I'm interested in. I don't want 'sedan' performance numbers. I want something that can hit 60 in about 5 sec or less...preferrably less. What I'm wanting...is a 'green' version of the Z06 Vette or a Viper. Something that looks amazingly good, and has true performance.

      I'd go green in a heartbeat if they could do that.

      It isn't being superficial...it is getting what I want. Life is way too short not to do and get what you want to make your life happy.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    33. Re:How to market!? by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      Very impressive the tzero. That's what I'm looking for...just need to get the range to a normal distance (at least 230+ miles on a 'fill up'), and a price in a reasonable $30-$45K range. This would definitely satisy my criteria for going 'green'.

      Thanx for the link!

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    34. Re:How to market!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's more to life than commuting and the weekends. Kids playing sports needed to be driven around the county, doctors appointments, grocery shopping. Not all of it can be done in the weekends. And the commute doesn't even need to be that long, just has to be away from mass transit paths.

    35. Re:How to market!? by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      Yes, there's a lot of places where public transit just doesn't work. They have a bad system. But even in places where there is good public transit, many don't take advantage of it. Everybody thinks they have to own a car, or their life won't be complete. If governments devoted more resources towards public transit, then there would be a much better system. Currently, Public transit is seen as something for the poor, and therefore doesn't get the attention it needs. You can't just keep on piling cars onto the same roads as poplation increases along with the population density. That idea just doesn't scale well enough.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    36. Re:How to market!? by Rei · · Score: 1

      Toyota offers an 8 year warranty on their batteries. Since the Prius went on sale in 2000, they haven't had to replace a single one. It's designed to last the lifetime of the vehicle, and is completely recyclable. As for resale, hybrids hold resale value much better than non-hybrids. Some people pay more than the new list price for used Priuses because the production can't keep up with the demand. The satisfaction ratio on the Prius hovers at around 95%, one of the highest for any car.

      --
      It's time for Operation Crazy Plan.
    37. Re:How to market!? by birge · · Score: 1, Interesting
      You're wrong about the economy marketing. Hybrids tend to be expensive, government handouts notwithstandings. The target audience of the first hybrids (and current ones, too) were rich white ex-hippies who feel guilty about driving, but who are too misinformed and ignorant1 to realize a hybrid does nothing for mother nature, unless you drive it in the city. And if you drive to work in a city, you're a problem no matter what you drive.

      It's all just marketing. When our environmental policy is determined by car manufacturers, you know we're in big trouble. The only reason hybrids are considered worth a damn is marketing.

    38. Re:How to market!? by soft_guy · · Score: 1

      You can't just keep on piling cars onto the same roads as poplation increases along with the population density. That idea just doesn't scale well enough.

      Neither does public transit. Either way you have to reinvest money to add incrased capacity or you will inevitably have problems. The main advantage of cars is that you can go where you want to go when you want to get there. Public transit so far can't match that. And yes, it is mostly a system for the very poor. And yes, public transit systems tend to be poorly maintained, uncomfortable, full of graffiti, unsafe, and unreliable. Believe me, people would use it instead of cars if it were truly a better system.

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
    39. Re:How to market!? by Thorofin · · Score: 1

      While not 'Vette speed quite yet, the Accord Hybrid has more Horse Power than the the non-Hybrid. Honda's big on increasing Horse Power AND increasing MPG.

    40. Re:How to market!? by Smidge204 · · Score: 1

      That looks like it's made by Fisher-Price...

      =Smidge=

    41. Re:How to market!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you have a cite?

      1) Of course not. This is slashdot.

      2) You mispelled [sic] site. Check out my blog where I talk about this.

    42. Re:How to market!? by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You're wrong about the economy marketing. Hybrids tend to be expensive, government handouts notwithstandings.

      Perhaps you're not understanding the difference between "marketing a hybrid engine as a economy feature" and "a hybrid engine being an economy feature." In any case I know four people with hybrid cars. They all drive to work in a medium sized town (public transit is workable for some here, but not all). Three of them are computer geeks and one is a young, idealistic, hippy type. Two of the former who explained their purchase said that the subsidy from the feds and the state combined with their opinion that oil prices were on the rise made it a reasonable financial decision. Also they liked the added range in a state with long empty stretches of highway.

      who are too misinformed and ignorant1 to realize a hybrid does nothing for mother nature, unless you drive it in the city.

      Hybrids get greatly increased mileage for the first dozen miles of so, no matter what the driving environment. You can argue about the energy that went into production versus the gas saved or something, but to characterize anyone who buys one as "misinformed and ignorant1[sic]" is pompous in the extreme.

    43. Re:How to market!? by wattersa · · Score: 5, Interesting

      > Why are people even buying cars in the first place? If you city has good public transit, you could take the bus back and forth to work each day, and rent a car for the weekends for less then the price of owning a car. $15 a day to rent a car, plus $15 a day for insurance, that's $30 a day, times 8 days for weekends in a month, and you at $240 a month.

      I'll answer the economic question first and the philosophical question second. I live in San Francisco near SF State, my job is 12 miles away on the Peninsula, and my commute options are:
      *Driving*
      Ford Crown Victoria LX: $15488 in August 2000, pre-owned with 23,000 miles.
      4.6L V-8, 200 horsepower, 17/25 mpg (22 overall). 88,000 miles driven in 5.5 years = 16,000 miles/year. Gas costs at $2 per gallon avg over last 5.5 years = $1500 per year = $4 per day.
      Insurance: $68 per month with all my discounts = $2.27 per day.
      Maintenance: 3 oil changes per year at $60 at Jiffy Lube plus misc. maintenance averaging $300 per year = $480/yr = $1.30 per day.

      Total consumables cost per day of car use for ownership: $7.57 per day, assuming equal use on all days of the year (long trips on weekends make up for non-use, etc).
      Depreciation: car now worth $4500 = $11,000 depreciation over 5.5 years = $2000/yr = $5.50 per day.

      Total cost for car ownership, daily use for commuting and pleasure, etc etc: $13.07 per day.
      Time spent commuting: ~35 minutes per day for a 24 mile round trip. My car is in my apartment garage so I walk directly to it, drive to the office garage, and walk into the office.

      The question is whether public transit costs more than that amount per day.
      *Public Transit*
      Bus to Daly City BART station: $1.50, 10 minute walk away, ~5 minutes spent waiting for the bus. 5 minute ride to BART.
      $1.75 for BART ticket. 5-10 minutes spent waiting for train.
      20 minute train ride to Millbrae.
      Transfer to Caltrain, $1.50 ticket.
      10 minute train ride.
      Walk 5 minutes to office in downtown San Mateo.
      One-way cost: $4.75
      Time spent: 62 minutes.
      Double it for daily total: $9.50, 120 minutes avg.
      Assume use is halved on weekends for recreation, $4.75 and 60 minutes.

      Car: $4770 per year = $13.07 per day avg.
      Public transit: $2825 per year = $7.70 per day avg.

      Car: 35 minutes per day transit time
      Public transit: 98 minutes per day
      The question now is whether the time difference makes up for the higher cost of ownership. During the week I make $45 per hour. I save over an hour per day by driving. So I can work more per day and still have the same amount of leisure time as if I worked less and took public transit. If I work the full extra hour, I make an extra $39.63 per day by driving!

      Now the philosophical argument.

      For people under time pressure, public transit is the worst. You end up wasting a lot of time waiting around, getting tickets, waiting in line, waiting in the terminal, walking between trains, climbing stairs, and the like. Then you have the often neglected and graffittied vehicles filled with somber, depressed people. Not to mention panhandlers, drug addicts, and blabbermouths on their cell phones trying to catch up on work and not getting much done. I would rather work (and get paid for it) than spend time sitting in a train waiting to arrive at the next station. In my car I have the ultimate freedom in transport: I'm reverse commuting, which means no rush hour traffic and no waiting, I have my iPod hooked up and I can replay the same song 100 times in a row if I want, and I can take a beautiful leisurely drive on highway 280 south, "the world's most beautiful freeway," and luxuriate in the knowledge that if nothing else, I made it in life to the extent that I can afford to drive to work until gasoline reaches about $18 per gallon because I use less than two gallons per day and made that extra $39. Driving makes absolute sense to me, especially as cars get more efficient. Add to that the freedom of being able to go wherever I want at any

    44. Re:How to market!? by DDLKermit007 · · Score: 1

      Partially because the whole hybrid thing is what you'd call "an emrging technology." As more people purchase them: prices go down, manufacturers who are attempting to do some good get some of thier investment back to better, cheaper, more efficient models, competition ensues (which there isn't really much atm with hybrids) and everyone benifits. Oh wait...nevermind...I forgot I was living in the USA still.

    45. Re:How to market!? by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Actually, the problem is that you don't get instant torque from a gasoline engine. Electric motors make peak torque at 0 RPM. However, my car has only 155bhp and 155ft-lb stock, and I have nothing more than intake/exhaust for performance, and I will roast your little bimbo box hybrid off the line, because I have a hard suspension (no squat) and a close-ratio transmission. Trust me, I've done it before :P (And for all those others out there reading this, no, I don't think it was an impressive feat.)

      And uh, clutches were meant to be trashed :)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    46. Re:How to market!? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Well....what exactly is the 0-60 mph of the Honda Accord?

      Maybe you should look here before asking questions whose answers are so easy to find.

      The only commercially available vehicle that is what you describe is the T-Zero. 0-60 in 4.1, 13.2 second quarter mile, all-electric. They sell an ugly little generator trailer you can pull behind your T-Zero if you want to look like a retard, too. Last I looked at their site much they had some nice videos of a T-Zero beating some Carerra (maybe a 4) and a C5 Corvette Z06 or something.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    47. Re:How to market!? by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      cite. short for citation. he's asking for a reference not a webpage. slashdot indeed.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    48. Re:How to market!? by skintigh2 · · Score: 1

      Years ago I was playing a card game with friends where knowing what suit your partner was strong in would be a big advantage. They were joking around saying things like "I really LOVE my cards wink wink" or something about a "girl's best friend" or needing to fix their cat. So I started saying "Baby seals. Baby seals!"

      They all looked at me really weird. Then they burst out laughing for a long time. Then they all looked at me really weird again.

    49. Re:How to market!? by thatguywhoiam · · Score: 1
      Neither does public transit. Either way you have to reinvest money to add incrased capacity or you will inevitably have problems. The main advantage of cars is that you can go where you want to go when you want to get there. Public transit so far can't match that. And yes, it is mostly a system for the very poor. And yes, public transit systems tend to be poorly maintained, uncomfortable, full of graffiti, unsafe, and unreliable. Believe me, people would use it instead of cars if it were truly a better system.

      I suspect your ideas of what public transport can be are influenced by what you've seen in the US - which, frankly, is awful.

      The idea of capacity is not true. Where I live (Toronto), numerous studies have been comissioned on how to deal with the traffic problem as we can see ourselves going down the same road as many US cities. The crux of the problem is this: when you add more road capacity, traffic immediately rises to fill that capacity. In other words, when you build more roads, it does absolutely nothing to curb traffic - it only adds more cars.

      Now, transit does scale, particularly light rail and subway. The problem is that almost no city in the world spends the right amount of money to maintain this system, which yes, does call for eternal expansion (but what doesn't?). I remember the original plan for Toronto's subway was to expand it by a mile every single year. Those that live here would laugh bitterly at that as it hasn't even come close to happening. But I take exception to the idea that transit does not scale - it most certainly does, it's just rarely (if ever) done properly in the United States, or anywhere for that matter (more commonly in Europe).

      I had a car for about a year, and I hated it. And it wasn't the car itself - I rather like driving. But I hate traffic, and I hate paying ridiculous fees for unoccupied plots of asphault that I am allowed to leave my car on. I also hate the entire insurance racket. One day I sat down and did the math on what the car cost me, versus how often I used it. Turns out I could take a cab to work and back, every day, and end up paying about half as much as I did with a (fully paid-for! used!) car. So I ditched it.

      Now I rent a car once a month and it costs me $25 for the weekend. Put it on a gold credit card and insurance is taken care of. No worries about repairs, no worries about theft, parking for the month, any of that. I love it. (We also have a very innovative program happening here called AutoShare). Now, the only reason I can get away with this is that my city has a subway that is maintained. But it is relatively clean; I've lived here for ten years and nary a threat to my well-being; it is almost always much faster for destinations in town (99% of my travelling)... and generally just works better. If they spent the right money on the system, i.e. in proportion to its actual importance, I can't imagine how amazing it could be.

      Rail is the way to go for public transit, no question.

      --
      If Jesus wants me it knows where to find me.
    50. Re:How to market!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
      A quick search will tell you the Accord hybrid does 0-to-60 in about 6.7 seconds. Very respectable IMO. It's not going to beat a Viper, but then again this technology wasn't originally intended as a performance boost. You don't see sedans running in Le Mans very often, do you?

      It isn't being superficial...it is getting what I want.

      I'm sorry, but what you want is superficial since one of your main concerns is what the car looks like. That's the definition of superficial, being primarily concerned with the 'surface' aspect of the car. You can fairly argue that being superficial isn't bad, but it's false to say "I want a pretty car but I'm not superficial".

    51. Re:How to market!? by Eccles · · Score: 1

      Indeed. It would make far more sense for most folk to rig up solar panels into one's home, feeding back into the grid when the car isn't charging, and then plug the car in when it needs power. Even that, thought, doesn't currently seem to be cost-effective. I have half a double garage roof that is nicely positioned for solar shingles once they become cheap enough to install, but last I checked it wasn't even close. Solar hot water heaters are currently the most practical solar power systems AFAIK.

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    52. Re:How to market!? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      For a few more bucks than the base accord - $15,345 - you can pick up a Hyundai Accent GLS. It's got all the crap you want, and then some:

      - 1.6-liter, 16-valve, DOHC, 4-cylinder engine with CVVT
      - 5-speed manual transmission
      - 4-speed automatic transmission with overdrive (optional)
      - 4-wheel disc brakes
      - Anti-lock Braking System (ABS) with Electronic Brake Force Distribution (EBD)
      - Power-assisted rack-and-pinion steering
      - Advanced dual front airbags, front seat-mounted side-impact airbags and roof-mounted side-curtain airbags
      - Automatic front seatbelt pretensioners with force limiters
      - Side-impact door beams
      - 14" steel wheels and full wheel covers with P185/65HR14 tires
      - 15" alloy wheels with P195/55VR15 tires (optional)
      - Heated dual power outside mirrors (optional)
      - Chrome accented front grille
      - Bodycolor bumpers, bodyside moldings, mirrors and door handles
      - Tinted glass with windshield shade band
      - Variable intermittent windshield wipers
      - Roof-mounted micro antenna for greater radio reception
      - Most interior volume (passengers and cargo) for a sedan in its class
      - 8-way adjustable driver seat with dual height adjustment
      - Adjustable head restraints for all seating positions
      - Driver's seat folding armrest
      - Front seatback pockets
      - Bottle holders and map pockets in all four doors
      - Front and rear storage trays
      - 60/40 split fold-down rear seatback
      - Rear center folding armrest with cupholder
      - 172-watt AM/FM/CD audio system with 6 speakers and equalizer
      - Air conditioning (optional)
      - Tachometer
      - Power windows with driver's auto-down (optional)
      - Remote keyless entry system with alarm (optional)
      - Front illuminated vanity mirrors
      - Rear recessed coat hook
      - Two 12-volt outlets
      Premium-Sport
      - Air conditioning
      - Power windows with driver's auto-down
      - Power heated mirrors
      - Power door locks
      - Remote keyless entry with panic
      - 15" alloy wheels with P195/55VR15 tires

      And they have the "best warranty in america" - a statement I actually agree with.

      Plus, it's not a Toyota :)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    53. Re:How to market!? by Valdrax · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It isn't being superficial...it is getting what I want. Life is way too short not to do and get what you want to make your life happy.

      That sums up everything that is wrong about modern consumer society in two sentences.

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    54. Re:How to market!? by The+Fun+Guy · · Score: 1
      The degradation rate isn't really germaine to the economic calculation I presented, since it assumes that the performance remains steady, but to address your question:

      Real Goods says:

      In decades-long tests the fully-developed technology of single- and poly-crystal modules has shown to degrade at fairly steady rates of 0.5% to 1% per year. First-generation amorphous modules degraded faster, but there are so many new wrinkles and improvements in amorphous production that we can't draw any blanket generalizations for this module type.

      Presumably, that 0.5-1% degradation is for crystalline silicon PV. NREL says that amorphous thin-film cells:

      The first thin films, made of copper sulfide, suffered from an electrochemical instability that led to degraded performance. Copper sulfide never became a commercially significant thin film. The second commercial thin film, amorphous silicon, suffers from a serious degradation associated with (of all things) exposure to light. Called the Staebler-Wronski Effect, it results in about a 20%-40% degradation unless checked by design modifications such as thinner intrinsic layers and the use of multijunctions.

      This NREL article is from Oct 1995, and the 20-40% degradation rates are pretty bad. I got my 10% degradation figure from a paper article I read more recently, which discussed "recent improvements". Since I don't have time to find a citation for it, I'll withdraw the number, and grant a degradation rate of 1% per year to the car roof-top system.

      A PV panel that loses 1% efficiency a year will produce 90% of rated power output after 10 years, 82% after 20 years and 74% after 30 years. At 2% degradation, these are outputs of 82%, 67% and 54% of rated, respectively. Your 1970's models look like they are averaging a loss of ~2%/yr.
      --
      The man who does not read good books has no advantage over the man who cannot read them. - Mark Twain
    55. Re:How to market!? by Jtheletter · · Score: 1
      At 55 mpg, the gas cost to drive 200,000 miles (at $2.20/gallon) is $8,000. At 60 mpg, the gas cost to drive 200,000 miles (at $2.20/gallon) is $7,333. The difference is $666.

      You make an excellent point and it is well taken. At the moment these are not going to be as cost-effective as some might hope. However, you need to also take into account the fact that it is extremely likely that gas prices will only continue to increase going forward. Looking at just gas price increases in my area (Boston, MA) over the past year a rough estimate is that prices have increased by $0.40 per gallon, that's a 20% increase in just one year! Granted, Katrina disrupted the gulf coast and damaged both oil and gas production and distribution causing increased prices. However prices right now are almost equal to levels they were post-Katrina, they dropped slightly as production came back online, but never fully recovered and have slowly crept up. Going into summer we can expect the usual price increases as more people are out driving for pleasure or vacation. It seems pretty clear that gas prices will continue to climb without another major disaster. If we get another Cat 5 storm on the gulf coast, if Iran shuts down oil production or possibly the whole Persian Gulf, or any number of other unforeseen but likely scenarios we can expect oil and gas prices to make another major jump.

      For the sake of argumant let's look at your numbers again over a 10 year span and choose the (IMHO modest) appreciation of 10%/year in gas prices. So we're looking at a 100% increase in the cost of gas over 10 years, I don't think that's completely out of the question considering that many countries pay that much or more now. At 55mpg it would cost roughly $13,120 for gas over that ten year span, that's $5000 more than the figure that assumes gas stays steady at $2.20/gal. At 60 mpg using the same calculation I get total cost of $10,620. The difference now is $2,500, slightly more than the $2,195 price tag for this device!

      To be fair we would also have to take into account the degredation over time of the solar panel, and any maintenance costs. But the point is the cost savings - while not stellar - are a bit better than you make out. It's possible that if the panel degredation and/or efficiency can be improved then there would be a definite cost savings over 10 years and 200K miles. These calculations were also assuming that the price of gas would only double by the end of that ten year period, which seems extremely low given the current state of oil markets and the political climate surrounding the largest oil producing nations. If a major event causes gas prices to more than double, or double in less than 10 years then these panels would actually provide a positive savings over their lifetime.

      --
      -- I'm not a pessimist, I'm a realist. It's not my fault that life sucks so much. --
    56. Re:How to market!? by guaigean · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure where you live, but I have yet to see 15/day car rentals. Additionally, I live in Alaska, so that should answer your public transportation comments.

      --
      Microsoft Sucks, F/OSS Rocks. I get mod points now right?
    57. Re:How to market!? by CastrTroy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So, obviously, none of your transit system offer monthly passes. At 9.50 a day, that's $285 a month. I don't know of any public transit system that charges that high of a rate for a monthly pass. It's usually under $100 for most transit systems. A quick look at the BART website shows that you can get deals if you don't buy your tickets one at a time. Plus it's a little more convenient to not have to buy a ticket every time you need one. Also, your 36 minutes in the car that you are driving is 36 minutes in which you can do nothing but drive. If you spend 98 minutes on the bus/train each day, then there's other things you can be doing with your time that you spend commuting. You could even to work, and see if you can bill for the time since you are actually working. Does it really matter that you aren't physically in your office. Plus according to the AAA, driving a car on average costs between $5500-$7000 a year. So maybe you're on the lower end of the average, but I don't think your numbers are that accurate.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    58. Re:How to market!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Why are people even buying cars in the first place? If you city has good public transit, you could take the bus back and forth to work each day


      Sounds good but I don't live in the city. There is bus service around here but it doesn't go anywhere useful. The nearest bus stop is about 2 miles away and that bus isn't going to take me anywhere near where I work or shop or that I want to go.

      If I am going into the city for a ball game I can drive half way there, park at a park and ride, and grab a bus in. I save $10-15 for parking but the bus ticket is $3, plus if I stay after for dinner or drinks I have to be sure to catch the last bus out at midnight or I am in for a long expensive taxi ride.

      What really gets me is that they are spending millions and millions of dollars to "upgrade" the bus system and after all the upgrades, and tunnels, and new HOV lanes the buses still won't go anywhere useful.
    59. Re:How to market!? by CastrTroy · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ottawa has a transit way which is a road that only the buses can use. It's amazing. Really helps to speed things up. I think the major reason people have such a bad view of buses is because they all stick them on the same roads as the cars, making them slow. When they give the busses their own roads, kind of like the trains having their own tracks, things can move quite quickly.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    60. Re:How to market!? by Damvan · · Score: 1

      The data you are citing is old.

      The panels on my roof are warrranted for 80% power output after 25 years.

      http://www.bp.com/sectiongenericarticle.do?categor yId=3050548&contentId=3060160

    61. Re:How to market!? by Damvan · · Score: 1

      Do you have any idea how polluting a oilfield is? A oil refinery? A coal mine? A coal burning power plant?

    62. Re:How to market!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Just TRY and design a mass transit system for So. Cailornia. Even with unlimited funds you can't build something cheaper and faster than cars. The problem here is the low density. Would you build a train that ltts off one or five peple at each stop or would you put the stops five miles a part? In a hight density city it works.


      Cars are actually quite good in that they are there with out a wait, they go directly where needed without a detour and they don't make unneeded stops causing delay. But in high density areas cars cause congestin but in very low density areas they are the best transportation by far. There is a grey area too where the density is on the border. That is So Cal.


      The other problem with cars is that each person buys his own and so looks at price. Price is the reason we all have gasoline powered cars. It's a cheap fuel. Electric cars are the way to go powered off the grid.

    63. Re:How to market!? by Ced_Ex · · Score: 1

      Till then...I'm not interested. Gas prices aren't that big a deal to me...my last car was a little european car that only got 10 mpg before Katrina killed it (RIP).

      Kind of makes you wonder whether Mother Nature has some intent on that?

      --
      Live forever, or die trying.
    64. Re:How to market!? by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      Your kids sports are way too complicated. Just play for a local league where there isn't any travelling involved, its much easier on your kids. Grocery shopping can be done without a car. Either you pick up small loads which can be carried in a back pack, or you could get them delivered by the grocery store, which usually only costs around $5. As for doctors appointments, for healthy people maybe maxing out at 3 per year, is that really worth owning a car?

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    65. Re:How to market!? by hswerdfe · · Score: 1

      er...
      well you could get the wood delivered!
      or you could do like GrandParent Post says.
      and Rent when you make a lumber pickup.

      as for feeling like less of a consumer.
      well a ipod + car + gas
      makes me feel like more of a consumer than public transit. (but thats just me)

      as for feeling like you "made it in life" because you can drive some highway, I think you need new priorities.

      --
      --meh--
    66. Re:How to market!? by Ced_Ex · · Score: 1

      But doesn't the Accord Hybrid have less storage space due to the battery taking up some room in the trunk?

      --
      Live forever, or die trying.
    67. Re:How to market!? by bobcat7677 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That figure of "0 battery packs replaced in prius ever" is misleading. Toyota is quick to make this claim...but it's based on some tricky definitioning. I have seen several accounts in different forums of people getting their battery packs replaced in the prius under warranty. Toyota claims that no batteries have been replaced for being "worn out". The way they get away with this is by labelling all the batteries they have to replace as "defective" instead of "worn out". I find it difficult to believe though that someone could have their car a year and put 70 - 100,000 miles on their car before deiscovering that their battery pack is "defective". Linakage: http://www.hybridcars.com/discussion/discussthread .php?thread_id=254&replies=9

    68. Re:How to market!? by hswerdfe · · Score: 1

      just a suggestion to help
      www.enterprise.com
      says they will pick you up at your home, or place of buisness

      They are often Late, but its an option, to consider

      --
      --meh--
    69. Re:How to market!? by dgatwood · · Score: 1
      Frankly, I doubt photovoltaic add-on packages will ever be cost effective for a hybrid vehicle. The efficiency is way too low, for one thing. For another, one of the theoretical benefits is charging while your vehicle is sitting in the parking lot. That only works if the battery has space to store more charge, but the presence of an engine in the hybrid designs minimizes the effectiveness. Finally, the gas mileage when you add PV cells to the roof of a car will automatically drop significantly before you hook the cells up, as you are disturbing the wind-tunnel-tested airflow over the top of the car, so in effect, you're taking a huge loss and only getting a tiny fraction more than that back.

      What would be somewhat effective would be a non-hybrid vehicle, e.g. a fuel cell design with built-in support for PV and a control circuit designed to not run the fuel cells until the battery gets below a fairly low threshold (using deep-cycle batteries), with the PV cells built into the vehicle's design from the factory in place of the normal roof material, with a similar shape.

      As for myself, I don't plan to buy another vehicle that uses gasoline---not even a hybrid. I'm going to use my current vehicle until I can buy something that is powered by fuel cells. That way, I can set up a solar array at home to power a hydrogen generator and have (maintenance notwithstanding) absolutely zero incremental costs from energy. This nickel-and-dime crap we put up with now is for the birds.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    70. Re:How to market!? by ShaneThePain · · Score: 1

      thats a very selfish premise. I dont care what Ayn Rand says, selfishness is NOT a virtue. Go ahead, drive around in your gas guzzling hot rod car, what good will it do you when gas costs 50 dollars a gallon because of Peak Oil?

      --
      Fascism is the greatest political ideology ever conceived. Sorry.
    71. Re:How to market!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you considered moving to within walking or cycling distance of your job? Cheaper, healthier, easier (no oil changes), less stressful (no traffic jams) and maybe even faster.
      I know not everyone can do it, but I've got to say I highly recommend it if you can.

    72. Re:How to market!? by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've even heard that there will be a new Nissan Skyline hybrid. Supposedly, the weight of the batteries and motors isn't hugely higher than the weight of the AWD system that it's replacing. The new car would likely have electric drive in front and conventional drive in the rear. But then, there's more Skyline rumors than Apple rumors...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    73. Re:How to market!? by MegaThawt · · Score: 1
      but I don't think your numbers are that accurate

      but from the BART page you yourself linked to ...

      $48 Ticket Costs Only $45!
      $64 Ticket Costs Only $60!

      Not that much of a discount.

      And your comment "I don't know of any public transit system that charges that high of a rate for a monthly pass" overlooks the fact that this traveler has to use three different transit systems: SF Muni, Bay Area BART, and San Mateo Transit.

      --
      All sigs should be as funny as possible, but no funnier.
    74. Re:How to market!? by ChrisGilliard · · Score: 1

      . Considering the kit costs over three times what the gas savings amount to, it is hard to market on account of good money-sense.

      Good evaluation. For an individual person, this is a very good thought process. When looking at the benefits to society there is a benefit to the environment if we generate less polution. Since individuals typically make decisions based on what's better for them rather than what's good for society with refernce to money matters, there is a need for government to use it's power to factor in the environmental impact through tax credits and or other incentives for car manufacturers. Even if government gave a $1000 credit for buying this car, there would be substantially more people that would buy. An example of this is low income housing. Government subsidises low income housing because we don't want to have a large number of homeless. If it weren't for this subsidy, real estate developers would have no incentive to develop these properties because it's not profitable.

      I have limited understanding of the fabrication process of the solar panels, so it would be hard to say whether or not mother nature profits from this scenario.

      This is also a good point. If it causes more polution to create this panel, it doesn't make sense to do this. Based on my understanding, since it takes energy (some derived from 'dirty' sources) to make solar panels. As we convert more of our energy production to renewables, this will become less and less of a problem because the inputed energy used to make the panels is reneable and thus clean.

      --
      No Sigs!
    75. Re:How to market!? by mrraven · · Score: 1

      It's precisely the fact that American tend to measure EVERYTHING in dollars that makes for a whole world of trouble. After all it's all good until global warming drowns the coasts and warming kills the crops.

      "Only when the last tree has died and the last river has been poisoned and the last fish has been caught will we realize that we can not eat money." Attributed to Chief Seattle

      http://www.cyberwolfman.com/quotes.htm

      --
      Tired of all the isms, don't exploit people as an employer, or a government, mmmmK?
    76. Re:How to market!? by wattersa · · Score: 1

      > as for feeling like you "made it in life" because you can drive some highway, I think you need new priorities.

      On a second reading of my post, I agree that sounds a little strange and/or arrogant. I should have written that differently.

    77. Re:How to market!? by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      64 Ticket Costs Only $60. That's under 94 cents a ticket. You quoted $1.75 for a BART Ticket. That's a 47% savings. Since when is a 47% savings not much of a discount? I don't really think you have done a good comparison of the costs. BART = $60 a month, SFMuni costs $45 a month, and San Mateo costs $48 a month, = $153 a month. Plus, you can use the SFMuni pass on the BART depending on which stations you get on at. So you may not even have to buy all those passes.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    78. Re:How to market!? by Synn · · Score: 2, Informative

      Why are people even buying cars in the first place? If you city has good public transit, you could take the bus back and forth to work each day, and rent a car for the weekends for less then the price of owning a car.

      Because almost every city in the US doesn't have a good public transit system. Owning a car is expensive, 100-200 a month in insurance, 300-400 a month in payments and worse health. But people pay that because they have little other choice.

      In most cities in America the public transit system is barely surviving and is typically bailed out by the local city so people who can't afford cars have transportation at all. Bus schedules for those cities typically suck as they're trying to save as much money as possible. When I was without a car in Fort Wayne Indiana, taking the bus would turn what was normally a 20 min car trip into an hour plus bus ride. And that doesn't include the time spent waiting on the bus in freezing cold weather.

    79. Re:How to market!? by wattersa · · Score: 1

      Yes, unfortunately I have a one year lease that I signed before getting my current job, and I'm in month 6, but I will most certainly be moving as close to work as possible when it's up. When I lived in San Mateo before this I biked to the train and biked in San Francisco to school until I got a job that caused the economics to favor driving.

      I'd sublease my place but no one is interested, and also the contract forbids it. So I'm stuck here, basically. Still, 12 miles each way isn't bad. Some people drive from Sacramento to San Francisco every single day. I can't understand how they do that.

    80. Re:How to market!? by sribe · · Score: 1

      can't agree more - my prius will drag just about anyone from a standing start, especially on a hill - it's that high torque electric motor that does it - instant power you just don't get from an gas engine without trashing your clutch

      Which is why I want a small SUV (think Subaru Forester) with hybrid. I want the torque to be able to climb steep rocky grades, without having to buy a big-@$$ truck with a transfer case and low gear range.

    81. Re:How to market!? by killbill! · · Score: 1

      Also available, the Venturi Fetish. (Warning: Flash site with sound. Google "Venturi Fetish" if you don't like it)
      0-62 (100 kph) in 4.5 seconds (for the record, a 911 Carrera S takes 4.8 seconds).
      Top speed is capped at 105 mph but you're not supposed to drive any faster anyway. ;)

      It's the very first all-electric production car that is usable every day (i.e. sufficient range and fast recharge times). It comes with every safety and comfort feature expected in a modern high-end sportscar.

      The only downside is its price: an "affordable" 540k EUR. Maybe I should start a PayPal donation page...

    82. Re:How to market!? by wattersa · · Score: 1

      BART is based on a debit system where you have a prepaid ticket with $X, and it costs a fixed amount of $Y per segment rather than giving you one ticket to ride the whole system end-to-end. This is one of the most common criticisms of BART, because long trips are no more economical than short trips. In my three-agency trip, BART is the most expensive component. A monthly SF Muni pass is $45, so I'd have to take Muni 30 times before it was worth it. The Muni pass is only valid on BART for trips within San Francisco, and my trip would start to the south and end further south :/

      In my example trip I'd take Muni about 20 days per month so that would be 40 muni trips, a savings of $15 with the fast pass...it's not really worth the trouble.

    83. Re:How to market!? by 2short · · Score: 1, Flamebait


      At 0, or any low rpm, the electric motors in a hybrid will easily have enough torque that tire traction will be the limiting factor on acceleration (even if you put big sticky race car tires on). Their controllers are programmed for efficiency, because hybrid buyers are gennerally uniterested in pointlessly screaming away to the next stoplight. Gasoline engines just don't function at all at 0 rpm, and don't function efficiently at low revs; so they must rely on slippy clutches to get moving from a stop, and they must be made much larger and less efficient than otherwise to get decent acceleration.

      "And for all those others out there reading this, no, I don't think it was an impressive feat"

      Yet you did it, and proudly recounted the experience here. Don't be so humble. You did it. You pulled out your wallet, and bought a big inneficient engine, and you pull it out and pay too much for gas. Go ahead man, be proud.

    84. Re:How to market!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bah! I will never vote for public transit and I avoid it when I can (which is most of the time.)
      It is unfortunate that your public transportation experiences were so horrible and traumatic. How did you ever survive? Are you in counseling for it now?
      Perhaps an exercise might help you revocer from your post-traumatic stress disorder.

      Try this: Ask yourself some questions:
      --What if no one ever used public transit? Do you think more cars on the road would be less frustrating and provide a better commuting experience for all? In what way would more cars on the road be a good thing?
      --Is it possible that instead of complaining about public transit when riding it that you will complain about traffic when you drive?
      --Do you really think the transportation answer is to build more and bigger roads? If so, please explain where the space for ever bigger roads is going to come from in core cities. Please also explain how this aids the goal of reducing reliance on foreign-supplied oil products.
      --Just because YOU had bad experiences and have therefore decided you "will never vote for it and avoid it when I can" does this automatically preclude the value of any public transportation options? Is your experience universal or are you having trouble with your post traumatic stress disorder?
      --Based on what evidence is public transportation "as expensive as a car (or more)"? For me to take public transportation to work would cost about as much as gasoline for my car.
      --What consideration beyond your own selfish wants have you given to the larger transportation picture? Oh, none? Hmmmm.

      Best of luck with your PTSD!

    85. Re:How to market!? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      No one said that. Besides, you clearly are highly superficial if you think that being unattractive makes a car a crap heap. (Personally, I think being a Toyota or a Honda does that, although to be fair, every honda except the NSX and every toyota except the late-model Supra is fugly, too...)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    86. Re:How to market!? by ddopson · · Score: 1

      There is another interesting concept here: low speed, stop-and-go driving (heavy, heavy traffic). Gas engines are terribly inefficient at stop and go driving. Instead, use the gas engine to drive the alternator. Use the alternator current to drive the electric motors. Surround the electric motors in a feedback loop based on the radar/visual/whatever range to the car in front of you.

      The net result would be a car that had an uber-smooth "cruise-control"-like mode for bumper-to-bumper traffic. Hit a spot of traffic at the interstate interchange? Kick your feet up and relax as your car automatically paces the car in front of you. The acceleration and "braking" would be so gentle you would barely feel it. Heck, with cars now-a-days, you could probably watch a DVD while you waited.

    87. Re:How to market!? by thc69 · · Score: 2, Funny
      I guess it depends on your point of view...
      You pulled out your wallet, and bought a big inneficient engine, and you pull it out and pay too much for gas.
      That's funny, because I was thinking: "Hmm...155bhp and 155ft-lb...Wow, he outran something with that puny tin can?"

      I, of course, drive an "I don't give a flying fuck about you"-mobile, because I in fact DO need to move heavy loads long distances almost every day, for my job. Of course, as a result, I've gotten so used to my elbows and knees not rattling against the plastic of the claustrophobic cockpit of a compact car, that I'll never drive anything without a bench seat again, which pretty much limits me to pickups and full size SUVs, or maybe an occasional Buick...

      Anyway, when not encumbered by my 6000 pound trailer, my "fuck you and the environment, I'm a redneck and proud of it"-mobile would probably drive circles around the "155bhp and 155ft-lb"-tincan, the "Will Somebody Please Think Of The Children"-Prius, and whatever you drive. Of course, if it failed to steer in those circles (if I was interested in handling, I'd have gotten the Toyota, but the GMC is much more comfortable and handles heavier loads), then my "you're gonna die in an accident with me"-mobile will either run over your car or shear off the roof (and your head).

      This "you're all gonna hate me now"-comment was brought to you by "I sure hope Biodiesel gets mass produced and distributed so I can buy a diesel truck next time and not have to worry about supporting the terrorists"-guy.
      --
      Procrastination -- because good things come to those who wait.
    88. Re:How to market!? by Kris_J · · Score: 1

      Real fuel savings will depend on usage patterns. For example, my typical usage of my car is an eight minute journey two and from work five days a week that could theoretically be done at no more than the max speed of the Prius running on the electric engine only. If the solar panels could replace the power used over the course of a normal work day while it sits in the car park, my MPG would tend towards infinity. Only the occasional longer journey, or anything requiring the use of the local freeway would use any petrol at all.

    89. Re:How to market!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because I'm sure "Carol", "Joe", and "Steve" have a strong understanding of hybrid technology and exactly what was going on with their cars.

    90. Re:How to market!? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      At 0, or any low rpm, the electric motors in a hybrid will easily have enough torque that tire traction will be the limiting factor on acceleration (even if you put big sticky race car tires on).

      I doubt it. I dunno the torque specs but last I looked the electric motors in a hybrid only provided ~40-50 hp peak. I sincerely doubt they have enough torque to trivially spin the tires.

      my car has only 155bhp and 155ft-lb stock

      Yet you did it, and proudly recounted the experience here.

      I do not think that word means what you think it means. Specifically: "To narrate the facts or particulars of." I did not provide a narration (look that word up too, if you're confused.) I only made a mention. Hope this helps. Try not to use words you don't understand in the future.

      You pulled out your wallet, and bought a big inneficient engine, and you pull it out and pay too much for gas.

      Riiight. My 2.4 liter SOHC Nissan engine with SEFI is a "big inneficient engine"(sic). The 1989 240SX - the vehicle in question - gets 30 mpg at 85mph, stock. Mine gets a little less since I've mucked with it, but even so I got 25mpg on my last tank, and that's mixed driving including twisty, hilly roads. That's real, measured mileage. It's better than half as good as a latest-model Prius, and the car is a 1989. It costs more energy to make the Prius than I could save by buying one, even if I kept the Prius for 30 years.

      My other car is a 1981 Mercedes 300SD. It, too, has a fairly small engine; a 3 liter 5 cylinder SOHC turbo diesel. It also gets 25mpg real-world, in spite of weighing 3500 pounds, and that car has an automatic transmission based on a 1930s chrysler design. But even better, that vehicle (my primary - I'm driving the Nissan right now because my mercedes alternator went out, I think) can be run on vegetable oil or biodiesel, while the prius and other gasoline hybrids run only on gasoline. They could possibly be redesigned as "flex-fuel" vehicles that can run on either gasoline or E85 (15% gasoline, 85% ethanol) but ethanol is pretty useless, being even more expensive to make than biodiesel, and far less available than SVO, WVO, or diesel.

      Granted, I do pay too much for gas, but I'm on my way to running on veg. Not in the sports car, but that's not meant to be my commuter anyway. The Benz is a lot more comfortable.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    91. Re:How to market!? by jacksonj04 · · Score: 1

      And how do you propose to steer whilst watching this DVD? Just out of professional interest.

      --
      How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
    92. Re:How to market!? by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "thats a very selfish premise. I dont care what Ayn Rand says, selfishness is NOT a virtue. Go ahead, drive around in your gas guzzling hot rod car, what good will it do you when gas costs 50 dollars a gallon because of Peak Oil?"

      Well, I make pretty good $$'s now...to support my 'habits'. I supposed I'll keep working harder to afford gas for my toys as long as I can.

      Realistically..I don't see it getting unreasonably high anytime that soon. And I'm not driving an SUV...so, that should make some people happy.

      But, hell...even $5/gallon doesn't scare me anytime soon for my car...tho I do see that other things will get more expensive..food, etc. But, my not driving a sports car won't swing that reality one way or another.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    93. Re:How to market!? by njh · · Score: 1

      PV makes a lot of sense in remote power applications. Lighthouses, traffic monitoring systems, communication satelites, lamp posts in forests - that sort of thing. It is not yet cost effective when the grid is closer than say 1km, and may never be.

      I agree about the hybrids, we have a cheap little toyota hatchback which gets about the same L/100km as a prius and it only cost us $14k, compared to $44k for a prius. However, the prius is more likely going to be the car of the future, as separating the energy source from the power train means that many other technologies can be tried (such as high efficiency diesel, fuel cells, stirling engines etc).

    94. Re:How to market!? by guaigean · · Score: 1

      Apparently you don't get it. Not everyone in the world is like you. Is that so hard for people to grasp?

      --
      Microsoft Sucks, F/OSS Rocks. I get mod points now right?
    95. Re:How to market!? by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "Surround the electric motors in a feedback loop based on the radar/visual/whatever range to the car in front of you....Kick your feet up and relax as your car automatically paces the car in front of you. The acceleration and "braking" would be so gentle you would barely feel it."

      Geez....THAT would totally suck the fun out of driving....

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    96. Re:How to market!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, you really drag about anyone from a standstill , esp. on hills with an ordinary front
      wheel drive ?
      I guess you forgot about four important components shared by all cars including the
      PRIUS - the tires - which in your case only amount to two propelled, not sure how all
      that fancy torque will be delivered on asphalt and not up in smoke ...

      Dan.

    97. Re:How to market!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PV (photovoltaic) panels - 25 years.
      Deep-cycle batteries - 5 years.
      The major contributor to observed degredation will be the batteries. The PV panels will probably outlast the car.

    98. Re:How to market!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gas prices aren't that big a deal to me...my last car was a little european car that only got 10 mpg before Katrina killed it (RIP).

      Ahh, karma's a bitch, ain't it?

      Stop fucking up the environment, and the environment won't need to fuck you back.

    99. Re:How to market!? by barawn · · Score: 1

      Maintenance: 3 oil changes per year at $60 at Jiffy Lube plus misc. maintenance averaging $300 per year = $480/yr = $1.30 per day.

      Car maintenance does not average $300/year. The typical amount that most suggest budgeting for car maintenance is $50/month, or $600/year. That's for a recent car. Double it for an older car.

      Your other problem was that you treated the $15,000 initial cost as a recurring cost. It isn't, so you need to account for inflation, which is about 2% per year. So that's about $6.20 rather than $5.50.

      But, of course, your biggest problem is this:

      Car: 35 minutes per day transit time
      Public transit: 98 minutes per day


      You pretty much can't do anything while you're in the car. That time is almost totally lost.

      In public transportation, almost one hour a day is on the train. That time is not lost. You can do things during that time.

      Treating your free time as profitable hours is also a mistake anyway (since you don't work 24 hours) because you can't earn money when you're not at work.

    100. Re:How to market!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, instead of driving to the restaurant, you could get your food delivered and save the world. Brilliant!

    101. Re:How to market!? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Ack, I tried to look at that car, but their website is so horrible it's not even funny. Flash everywhere! They appear to still be using php 3, though, from the file extensions, maybe I should hack their site and redesign it for them :P

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    102. Re:How to market!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder why a such a "crappy looking" car would get so much attention while driving down the street.

      Most people I talk to think the car looks cool and futuristic. In fact, in other countries the Prius is not even marketed as a "green" car

    103. Re:How to market!? by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 1

      Ottawa has a transit way which is a road that only the buses can use. It's amazing. [...] When they give the busses their own roads, kind of like the trains having their own tracks, things can move quite quickly.

      They need to do something about down-town during rush hour, though.

    104. Re:How to market!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't get it, do you?

      Electric motors are *completely different* from your Otto engines.

      For example, they can operate with full power at full stall.

      Power = torque * angular speed.

      You're right, the electric motor with such a low hp probably doesn't have enough cylinders to provide sufficient power through the transmission to get enough torque to spin the wheels.

      I respectfully withdraw my suggestion that you don't know what you're talking about.

    105. Re:How to market!? by 2short · · Score: 1

      "I dunno the torque specs..."

      295 lb-ft. (82 more from the gas once you're moving) But in any case the question for spinning your tires is how fast you transition from 0 to peak; with electric motors, you can make that transition essentially instantaneously if you like. If you hook up the electric motor in a Prius to a knife switch supplying all the amps they can handle, they'll smoke whatever tires you'd like. This is not what Toyota has done, but it's not because electric is inherently inferior to gas for acceleration; quite the opposite.

      Sorry if I went a bit over the top on my last post. You think cars are cool; that's OK, but it's no excuse for not knowing what you're talking about. You "roast" that hybrid off the line because you want to, and he doesn't. It's not your suspension, nor you close-ratio transmission (the Prius has a CVT, hard to get closer than that).

      Anyhow, don't take it personally, IMO all cars are for suckers. You'll certainly roast me with my '72 Raleigh Superbe.

    106. Re:How to market!? by kryonD · · Score: 1

      "I doubt it. I dunno the torque specs but last I looked the electric motors in a hybrid only provided ~40-50 hp peak. I sincerely doubt they have enough torque to trivially spin the tires."

      They do...quite easily. I painfully gave up my stick shift for the Prius because I do care both about the environment, and my pocket book. Sure enough, any small hill after a stop sign or red light and I will usually spin my tires for a split second before moving out due to my usual urge to floor it when I'm in a hurry.

      And yes, before the tree huggers flame me, driving the prius like that is somewhat self defeating, but you're just going to have to let me take my time letting go of my clutch popping days.

      --
      I've dirtied my hands writing poetry, for the sake of seduction; that is, for the sake of a useful cause. --Dostoevsky
    107. Re:How to market!? by God'sDuck · · Score: 2, Funny
      "Surround the electric motors in a feedback loop based on the radar/visual/whatever range to the car in front of you....Kick your feet up and relax as your car automatically paces the car in front of you. The acceleration and "braking" would be so gentle you would barely feel it."

      Geez....THAT would totally suck the fun out of driving....

      not when you hack the firmware to follow little old ladies at a distance of 0.1 inches...
    108. Re:How to market!? by Rei · · Score: 1

      Automatic transmission will add, what, 2,000$ to that price? AC optional? Add another few hundred. Power windows, power locks, and all the other things that come standard on the prius probably add up to another thousand.

      That's why I hate comparisons of vehicles that aren't on the same footing. Yes, you *can* get a car with nothing on it for 14-15k$. That doesn't make it a fair comparison to a vehicle that comes standard with all the things that you're omitting on your vehicle to make it cheaper. When you compare a Prius with an *equal* non-hybrid vehicle in terms of cost effectiveness, it comes out on top.

      --
      It's time for Operation Crazy Plan.
    109. Re:How to market!? by nanoakron · · Score: 1

      4.6L engine with only 22mpg economy considered a good car?

      Only in the US...

      -Nano.

    110. Re:How to market!? by wattersa · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty lucky in maintenance. The Crown Vic is reliable, and parts are cheap. I had to replace the shocks and the tires once for a total cost of $1000, and that was 2 years ago. That was the only major expense I've had to pay in 5 1/2 years of ownership. Other than oil changes, I replaced the battery for $100, did two transmission flushes at $125 each, and replaced a shattered window for $160. That's everything.

    111. Re:How to market!? by Rei · · Score: 1

      Most solar cells are mono and polycrystaline, so you just trashed your 10% number by citing 0.5-1% as the annual degradation rate. Also, the second number that you cited talks about early thin films with a *total* degradation of 20-40% (not annual). And the next paragraph begins "Fortunately, many of these problems are behind us." They then proceed to state that modern modules never degrade more than 20-25%, ever.

      I'm glad to see that you retracted.

      --
      It's time for Operation Crazy Plan.
    112. Re:How to market!? by wattersa · · Score: 1

      > It's precisely the fact that American tend to measure EVERYTHING in dollars that makes for a whole world of trouble

      By contrast, measuring with money is the best way for people to make rational decisions, and the only way to encourage greater efficiency. You can talk all day about "saving the environment" or blaming the Americans for being oil-thirsty suburbanites, which makes for good coffee table discussion, but you're only going to affect the idealists. By contrast, increasing the price, taxing, or regulating something bad causes real changes in behavior and real responses from consumers based on increased costs they must pay. Double the gasoline tax and people will use less gasoline by buying more efficient cars, it's almost that simple and it's already happening because of the prices, even though the prices in the U.S. are still low relative to the world. Witness the proliferation of cheap, efficient motor scooters in places like India and southeast Asia, where the masses cannot generally afford cars.

      Lastly, if I were a European conglomerate owned by members of the propertied upper class in Europe, I would _want_ the non-propertied class to blame the Americans while I lined my pockets with profits from rents, wireless phone service, restaurants, and all the other expensive things they have over in your neck of the woods. What better tactic than getting most of the population on your side of the opinion war-- advocating your position free of charge-- while laughing all the way to the bank? My friend, wise up to what's going on over there (I'm guessing you're European, sorry if I'm wrong).

    113. Re:How to market!? by chris_eineke · · Score: 1
      And uh, clutches were meant to be trashed :)
      True that. Though I wouldn't do that with an automatic transmission. Auto-clutches are very expensive to replace. About two to three times as expensive as manual-clutches.
      --
      "All you have to do is be fragile and grateful. So stay the underdog." Chuck Palahniuk, Choke
    114. Re:How to market!? by jafac · · Score: 1

      I dunno. Out of all the Cities in the US in which one could walk to work, I think San Francisco is about my favorite. Nothing beats walking past a public park at 6 am in the morning, filled with 100 or so octogenarian chinese-americans doing their tai-chi.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    115. Re:How to market!? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Oops, sorry, I should have edited the above copy. Every feature listed on my prior above comment is included in that price, including the alloy wheels, auto trans ($800 option), air conditioning, et cetera. I did the "build and price" thing. The base price is like $13,500.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    116. Re:How to market!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The goggles, they do nothing!

    117. Re:How to market!? by TheSuperlative · · Score: 1

      That all depends greatly on where you live. I live in Washington, DC, and we have pretty good public transportation - the metrorail can get you most places, and the bus is fairly reliable and can get you within half a mile of anywhere in the metropolitan area. I don't own a car, nor do I intend to buy one anytime soon. We also have services like Zipcar, where one can borrow a car at convenient locations around the city for only $8.50/hour or $60/day, which allows one to have access to a car when they absolutely need one every once in awhile. In the U.S., only major cities such as Boston, New York, DC, Chicago, San Francisco and a few others have comparable public transportation systems. But that becomes a more difficult equation when you consider real estate costs. Many people cannot afford to buy anything in the area unless they move beyond the reach of public transit - necessitating a car. Some people do choose to live as far away as West Virginia and take commuter rail, but a 2 hour commute is not for everyone. So I'd say the question involves two critical components: living cost vis-a-vis transportation costs. It might make a lot of economic sense to buy a house/condo, build equity, and suffer from car payments and lost time driving.

      --
      "In God we trust, all others we monitor." -- Unofficial NSA motto
    118. Re:How to market!? by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1
      That's a really dumb quote.

      Money is only a symbol of wealth. By the time we reach the last fish, so few people will exist that money will be worthless and we will have already reached a barter system.

      Not only that, but reaching a point of the last fish caught/last river polluted will never happen. A correction in the number of human beings existing will occur.

      A better quote is "money talks". It's what people understand. It's a symbol of wealth, a measurement of how large a car someone can buy, how much lettuce they can own, how much they can waste in a casino at the weekend, or how many wells they can have built in African villages.

    119. Re:How to market!? by jelle · · Score: 1

      "Frankly, I doubt photovoltaic add-on packages will ever be cost effective for a hybrid vehicle. The efficiency is way too low, for one thing."

      Rigth now, the rought price for PV is $5/Watt, and some labs have come out saying they are developing product for $0.50...$1/Watt.. So, divide your PV price by 5 to 10 and then think again.

      The cells can then also go into hybrids (no need to wait for fuel cells).

      --
      --- Hindsight is 20/20, but walking backwards is not the answer.
    120. Re:How to market!? by constantnormal · · Score: 1

      An assumption of $2.20 per gallon over the next 200,000 miles seems rather artificial and far-fetched. There are (some) arguments for gas prices falling, and (a lot) for gas prices rising over the near-term future.

      One would expect that purchasers of hybrids do so with the expectation that gas prices will continue to increase. It would be instructive to see various cost models based on the price of gas moving from $2.20 per gallon to something like $4.20 per gallon over that 200,000 miles.

      However, by my figuring, allowing for a linear rise in the price of gas from $2.20 to $4.20 per gallon over that 200,000 miles, the savings is still only $1,272. But there are still a lot of back-of-the-envelope assumptions involved here, not the least of which is an inflation rate of zero.

      The point of all this is that evaluating the merits of anything that is intended to save money based on future conditions is a dicey business. All one requires to see an effective price of gas of oh, say something like $10/gallon, would be a nuclear war in the Middle East. Given the current state of affairs in that region, it doesn't seem like all that long a bet that such an event would take place sometime in the near future (5-10 years out). And in that case, the ability to make short trips in a hybrid using only battery power might be priceless.

    121. Re:How to market!? by cos(0) · · Score: 1

      Too bad we're all in this boat together.

      Please read The Tragedy of the Commons.

    122. Re:How to market!? by iphayd · · Score: 1

      Wow! That's a really nice car. Their website tells me that they're going to begin production in 2002. When I paid my $20,000 deposit, they told me that I would get the first one, but it will take 6-8 months to build it. I can't wait. However, when I called back to tell them that the bank transfer went through for $10,000 too much, they weren't answering my calls.

      For anyone that is actually planning on dealing with this company, I don't have any history with them, and do not actually speak of the ethics of this company that has not updated their website in at least five years.

    123. Re:How to market!? by thatguywhoiam · · Score: 1
      You get props for "the funny", which is in abundance. However I read your post three times and could not actually locate a point.

      (This comment was brought to you by "regulation guardrails stop normal cars but will flip your SUV like a flapjack"-guy)

      --
      If Jesus wants me it knows where to find me.
    124. Re:How to market!? by 955301 · · Score: 1

      Seems like you'd enjoy reading up on Personal Rapid Transit. The hypothesized system would have no wait times for a vehicle, show up right at the door to your office (assuming big office = station).

      http://faculty.washington.edu/jbs/itrans/prtquick. htm

      --
      You are checking your backups, aren't you?
    125. Re:How to market!? by arminw · · Score: 1

      ...... I will roast your little bimbo box hybrid off the line, because I have a hard suspension (no squat) and a close-ratio transmission.....

      I think my Accord Hybrid would leave you looking at its tail-lights in any sort of 0to60 test. The combination electric motor and V6 gives it a good push, yet it gets 30-35 mpg in average driving. Find someone with such a car and do the test! Heated leather seats, a satellite radio and its other amenities make it a pretty nice car.

      --
      All theory is gray
    126. Re:How to market!? by thc69 · · Score: 1

      Well, the point was kind of thin...it was mostly for humor. One user posted "even my 155hp vehicle outran a prius"; another replied "sarcasticly impressed, you spent money on a big displacement muscle car"; and my point was that from a different POV, it sounds like the first user bought a cheezy econobox. Like I said...it was an excuse to post funny stuff.

      This comment brought to you by "regulation guardrails would be torn out of the ground and disintegrated by my pickup with a load of materials in the bed"-guy.

      --
      Procrastination -- because good things come to those who wait.
    127. Re:How to market!? by arminw · · Score: 1

      .....But doesn't the Accord Hybrid have less storage space due to the battery taking up some room in the trunk?....

      My Honda Accord Hybrid has its battery behind the back seat and not in the trunk. Unlike its non-hybrid brothers, the back seat cannot fold down and thereby make a continuous load surface from the trunk. Trunk space per se is not less however. This car is a sedan, not a sports car, but quite a peppy one with 255hp from the combined electric and V6 engine. It gets between 30 to 35mpg. When stopped at a light, the engine stops also. The electric motor really helps it get going quickly again and also helps slow the car when braking.

      --
      All theory is gray
    128. Re:How to market!? by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      That's 94.697uS at 60MPH. Good luck with that.

    129. Re:How to market!? by MaWeiTao · · Score: 1

      Well, imagine how much cheaper his expenses would have been if he had made calculations for a 1.6 liter car making 35+ mpg.

    130. Re:How to market!? by Profound · · Score: 1

      >> Now the philosophical argument.

      That's not particularly philosophical.

      How about: Is the true cost of burning fossil fuels only reflected in the pump price, or does it come with other costs such as pollution, road fatalities and foreign wars?

      I enjoy the feeling of driving on country roads etc, but I don't like the result of everyone having a car (more roads, sprawl, loss of natual areas, traffic congestion, pollution) and so choose to pay higher city rental prices so that I can walk to work and the supermarket and so not own a car.

    131. Re:How to market!? by Profound · · Score: 1

      >> reaching a point of the last fish caught/last river polluted will never happen

      I can see this happening before humans die out. I haven't caught a fish in years, but ate farmed tuna for lunch today.

    132. Re:How to market!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      but I had to drive a mile to get to the nearest bus stop


      You object to *walking* for one mile? That's 15 minutes at average walking speed!

      No wonder the US has such obesity problems
    133. Re:How to market!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm bringing my 2001 Prius in for the 95k mile checkup tomorrow, and I'm currently getting 46mpg on the original battery pack in below-freezing Minnesota weather. Any weather warmer than 60 degrees F yields ~50mpg with a little conscientious driving. Had warranty work done on the battery pack in fall '04, but it only amounted to cleaning the contacts on the pack due to light corrosian.

    134. Re:How to market!? by mrraven · · Score: 1

      No I'm a disgusted American. Disgusted at how much America has destroyed whether it's 85+% of our our old growth forests:

      "After 150 years of logging, about 15 percent of old-growth forest remains in the Pacific Northwest, about half of which is protected within Mount Rainier and Olympic National Parks."

      Source: http://www.americanparknetwork.com/parkinfo/ra/pre s/index.html

      And that's in the west where are still forests at all, east of St; Louis the destruction of old growth forests is in essence 100% complete.

      Or the hundreds of thousands of innocent civilian lives in Afghanistan and Iraq we have destroyed through war and "sanctions" for oil and Israel. And yes under Clinton and his bloody sanctions as well, the so called "liberals" are no better. And for what so lard asses can watch American Idol and the super bowl on their big screen t.v.'s? Perhaps "efficient" from a monetary point of view but I suspect history will judge us harshly for having destroyed so much for so little of lasting value. Rome in the time of Caligula comes to mind. When is the last time America produced a towering intellect on the order of Martin Luther King or Einstein? So much "wealth," and such a paucity of lasting achievements to show for it. And please don't even try to tell me Jobs, Torvalds, or Gates are world changing figures like Dr. King or Eienstain who will be remembered for hundreds of years, they aren't.

      Yes, with dollars as a benchmark we are doing well (or rather the upper 20& is doing well) quality of life, lasting cultural achievements, or a livable environment for our descendants? Not so much...

      --
      Tired of all the isms, don't exploit people as an employer, or a government, mmmmK?
    135. Re:How to market!? by milletre · · Score: 1

      There's an interesting problem that comes with trying to convince Americans to get out of their cars: They fail to factor in the cost of the roads they drive.

      Highways cost many many millions of dollars to construct; if users paid for what they were driving on, they would run the calculations differently. Think how much lower your tax liability could be if, on your commute, the city/county/state/federal government didn't need to pay for x stop signs, traffic lights, curbs, stripes, Botts dots, reflectors, patrols, landscaping, pothole repair, litter cleanup, bridges, continuous widening projects, and so on.

      You also fail to take into account that some cars break sometimes. Perhaps your particular car has had absolutely no trouble. Congrats. But timing belts, transmissions, tires, stereos, etc., can all fail, many times unpredictably. You have presented the absolute best case scenario for car ownership, not the most realistic.

      Please let me know, BTW, if you're still driving a Crown Vic once gas hits $18/gallon!

    136. Re:How to market!? by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1
      When is the last time America produced a towering intellect on the order of Martin Luther King or Einstein?

      America produced Einstein? Born in Germany, moved to Switzerland, where he took on Swiss citizenship, and then in 1940 moved to America. His greatest work was before he came to America.

      Have a look on Wikipedia at Nobel Prizes for Chemistry and Physics sometime and tell me that it's not chock-loaded with American scientists.

    137. Re:How to market!? by barawn · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, luck is not really predictable. You shouldn't budget on past performance, but expected future performance.

    138. Re:How to market!? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'm sure the accord would win, but I'm equally sure I can beat prius, civic, or insight. My poor little four banger probably couldn't beat your V6 by itself. Hell, the two liter integras beat me to 60 because I have to shift twice. Once the VTEC motors get up into the high Rs and stay there, they tend to kick my ass :(

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    139. Re:How to market!? by mrraven · · Score: 1

      Producing "Nobel Prize" winners is NOT the same thing as producing thinkers who fundamentally alter everyones concept of space and time. Even if you say string theory or whatever is as deep as Einsteins insights, no one has bothered to explain that to public. My point is then that the U.S. no longer produces public intellectuals, i.e. that our culture is degraded. I do think that is strongly correlated with people in the U.S. correlating success with monetary wealth. We do not value thought for it's own sake anymore than we value a beautiful wilderness for it's own sake. IMO that is a tragedy.

      There is more to life than Scrooge Mc Duck swimming around in a big pool of money. Such characters used to be figures of ridicule, alas not anymore, in our current culture we lionize the Donald Trumps who are our modern day Scrooges both in the Dickens and Disney sense of that character.

      --
      Tired of all the isms, don't exploit people as an employer, or a government, mmmmK?
    140. Re:How to market!? by birge · · Score: 1
      It's pompous if I'm wrong. Google around a bit and you'll see I'm not. (Also, it's quite pompous to use a sic quote for a clear typo.] The WSJ, in particular, recently had a very good article on hybrids. It's all marketing. What a lot of people fail to realize is that the ONLY way a hybrid gains efficiency is when recovering power from braking, and perhaps at idle. Other than that, it's just a heavier gas-powered car. Honda has made small conventional cars for YEARS that have much better mileage than the Prius. My turbo-diesel Jetta gets about 49 MPG. So, I don't think it's going too far to say that the people who buy Prii for the fuel economy are kind of clueless. They are paying a lot of money, society is paying some, and their fuel consumption would be better with much cheaper, same-size cars. Why do we have hybrids? Marketing and clueless consumers.

      Would anybody buy a car marketing as simply recovering power from braking? Hell no. But call it a "hybrid," thereby alluding to the (incorrect) notion that the car is alternatively powered, and yuppies suck it up.

    141. Re:How to market!? by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1
      Firstly, you have failed to address my point that Einstein's greatest work was in his time before coming to the USA.

      Secondly, show your proof. I've tried to come up with a measurable scale (nobel prize winners). How about you come up with an alternative that proves that the US no longer values intellectual thought. Who launched the Hubble telescope? Who launches most of the space probes? Who runs projects like SETI?

    142. Re:How to market!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The poster makes no overt claim that America produced Einstein. Read the sentence you're replying to again.

    143. Re:How to market!? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      If you have a typical Slashdot geeky job, Wi-Fi on public transit might have an impact on your calculations. Why, with two hours a day on the train, you could probably get most of your spam discarded!

      Plus, there's less chance of being killed commuting.

      In theory you can save your car budget for renting a convertible for taking the coastal highway, the way it was meant to be. Wind in your hair and a bad of fried baby artichokes - that's how it's supposed to be done.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    144. Re:How to market!? by mrraven · · Score: 1

      Precisely my point is that some things like the beauty of a forest can't be quantified. Never assume everything can be quantified. Just because geeks like to benchmark doesn't mean EVERYTHING can be benchmarked and to believe that is the case is to miss some of the most profound things in the world like beauty, or the quality of light as the sun rises.

      Would a Salieri symphony be better than Mozart because it has more notes per second? That is the sort of absurdity we get into when we try to measure qualities with quantities. The thing that makes a Mozart symphony isn't quantifiable, it's just a quality we know.

      Not that quantities don't have their place, without them we wouldn't have physics, biology, etc, and we would fall prey to superstition like creationism. But the broadest epistemology that sees all of the world recognizes that there are things that can be quantified and qualities which can't be quantified. To destroy the qualities of the world like culture and the beauty of forests because they couldn't be quantified or monetized would be the greatest tragedy imaginable.

      If it isn't obvious to you that the culture of the U.S.A. is in profound trouble a whole barrel of easy manipuable statistics isn't going to convince you otherwise. Anyone with any sensitivity and taste know though that our strip malled, tee vee intoxicated pop culture will not be remembered fondly. It may be enjoyable but it's not durable.

      --
      Tired of all the isms, don't exploit people as an employer, or a government, mmmmK?
  2. Economics working as usual. by CyricZ · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So often we hear fuss about our petrol supply running out. Sure, perhaps someday it will. But like usual, basic economics will take care of the situtation for us. When one energy source becomes increasingly scarce, it will become more expensive. Thus other technologies, such as windmills and solar panels, will become relatively cheaper. And thus people and businesses will switch towards them, as in this case. Anyone with any economics background would have known that decades ago.

    --
    Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
    1. Re:Economics working as usual. by gebbeth · · Score: 5, Insightful
      So often we hear fuss about our petrol supply running out. Sure, perhaps someday it will. But like usual, basic economics will take care of the situtation for us. When one energy source becomes increasingly scarce, it will become more expensive.

      Thats all well and good if all you use oil for is fuel. We use oil heavily in the production of all sorts of products, including plastics and a whole plethora of petrochemicals. We should curtail our oil user as a fuel now so that we can continue to use oil for its other users without having to pay 5 times the current price for a plastic toothbrush.

      --
      A closed mouth gathers no foot.
    2. Re:Economics working as usual. by Phillip2 · · Score: 1

      It's a nice idea, but oil and petrol will be available for a long time. The
      problem is one of stability of supply. If the oil is available, then it becomes
      uneconomic to shift to supply anything else. This is fine, of course, until
      the oil becomes unavailable in the short term; we can't just switch to wind
      power overnight.

      If you want an example of this, you can look at the various electricity
      utilities since they became deregulated in the first flush of neo-con fervour.
      Since that time the amount of spare generation capacity has been dropping year
      on year.

      The free market is not always good at emergency planning. This is why we have an army,
      rather that just letting an invisible hand provide one when the enemy invades.

      Anyone with any economics background would have known that decades ago.

      Phil

    3. Re:Economics working as usual. by j-cloth · · Score: 1

      And this new energy system is going to appear in a flash of capitalist magic? People (and when I say people I mean ME and YOU not some imaginary person who may or may not exist) have to actually do the work of discovering and designing and refining new systems to replace old systems. They have to be made to be ready before the old system fails rather than hoping that they apparate when it does.
      So, if you don't care about solar and other alternative energies, go ahead and live your little life, but don't scorn those who are trying to give you alternatives.

    4. Re:Economics working as usual. by vertinox · · Score: 1

      But like usual, basic economics will take care of the situtation for us.

      Yes, but letting the market take care of itself is like going with the "no lube" option. Sure, both options hurt, but sometimes as an individual your best option is to be knowledgable of market changes and get that bottle of KY in advanced before Peak Oil shows up at your door with a big nasty grin on its face.

      Of course... If Peak Oil does come, petroleum jelly might be rather expensive...

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    5. Re:Economics working as usual. by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So we make wooden toothbrushes. :) And make more things from wood. It's an excuse to plant more trees, wood looks and feels nicer and it biodegrades a tad better than plastic. Can also make common things like that from ceramics and other materials. Heck, I *hate* plastic bathroom/kitchen stuff. Wood, ceramic or glass for me, please.

    6. Re:Economics working as usual. by kilodelta · · Score: 1

      Having been a renter for my entire life I'm now starting to look at buying.

      Because on of the first things I'm going to do is put a solar hot water and solar electic system on the sunny side of said house.

      Utilities are getting ridiculous here in the northeast. My gas bill jumped from $400 one month to $850 the next. Yet it was an overall warmer month and I vary temps from 55 when we're sleeping or not there, to 65 when we are there.

      Though in my case that doubling is either a gas leak, or someone else is on my gas line after the meter. I suspect the latter.

    7. Re:Economics working as usual. by aarku · · Score: 1

      If it were simply economics, Solar PV would not have been chosen. According to BP (page 46 of following PDF), its cost is about $400 per Megawatt-hour, compared to about $45 for new gas and about $66 for onshore wind power.

      You can get some wonderful information off of slides from MIT theoretical physicist and BP's chief scientist, Steven Koonin, PhD. (Warning: PDF!)

      There is way too much information in the slides about energy trends to summarize here, so check it all out.

    8. Re:Economics working as usual. by soupdevil · · Score: 1

      Basic economics doesn't apply in this scenario, because the few large oil companies are international bodies, with little respect for markets. They strong-arm subsidies from governments in every country in which they operate, and do not have to participate in a fair, free market.

    9. Re:Economics working as usual. by DeveloperAdvantage · · Score: 1

      I used to feel the same way, that economics would just sort it out. Since then I have read more, and unfortunately, as any student with a background in history would have known, when the environment and physical systems are involved, economics simply does *not* work. Physical/biological systems and the laws they work under are often swift and brutal and they do not care about economic "cost" or "benefit".

      Here is an interesting article:

      http://www.greatchange.org/footnotes-overshoot-eas ter_island.html

      --
      FREE - Java, J2EE and Ajax Audiobooks for Software Developers - www.DeveloperAdvantage.com
    10. Re:Economics working as usual. by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Less likely trees and more likely hemp. It is faster growth, and can be easily farmed.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    11. Re:Economics working as usual. by budgenator · · Score: 1

      When one energy source becomes increasingly scarce, it will become more expensive.
      Seems increasingly the we are moving toward multiple enegery sources, and that the drive isn't driven purely by economic factor. The other week I was talking with one of our patients that works for Damiler-Chyrsler tech center at Auburn-Hills, in the enviromental division. He went about as far as is possible to say we're working on a hydrogen powered car as he could without actualy saying it. I've heard from other sources that GM cars and trucks since 2002 had hydrogen compatable engines, all that is neede is to install a H2 tank, change some fuel lines, put a new chip in the 'puter and bolt on a turbocharger.
      There are too many alternative technologies that are almost at break-even right now, even Bush was talking about them in the State of the Union. All we need now is some advertising durring the soap-operas, a bit on M-TV and cartoon network and we off.
      Sooner or later we're going to see 5th graders fighting about who's dad is cooler, the one driving a hydrogen-electric hybrid, or the one growing his own bio-diesel

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    12. Re:Economics working as usual. by afidel · · Score: 1

      Wood and ceramic are germ breeding grounds. Glass isn't, but it's not exactly something you want to make your wifes shaver out of, broken glass in the tub when she drops it doesn't sound like much fun.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    13. Re:Economics working as usual. by LiMikeTnux · · Score: 0

      Well, currently stuff like gasoline, diesel, and kerosene are considered by-products of oil refining...they cant be used in synthetics production, afaik. Whether we use all of our oil up or not, we're going to the the same amount of synthetics out of it

      --
      yap
    14. Re:Economics working as usual. by posterlogo · · Score: 1

      I'm not worried about the petrol supply running out per se. I am worried about what it means when we have actually burnt all those fossil fuels. That will mean that we have released in a few hundred years the CO2 stored in those fuels over a billion year time span. That would be catastrophic. I'm sure your econ-101 theory will pan out as far as expense, but is intelligent to allow it to get to that point? Just let economics decide? I don't think so. For one, the economics of having to deal with that CO2 buildup and all its consequences down the line is insane. Thus if one were to think long term, econcomically, it would be better to reduce and eliminate fossil fuel use earlier (through global mandates) rather than later (simply through market forces). But we are not doing that... so really, your economic theory from decades ago is still flawed. It's time to think long term, if 100 years can even be considered that long.

    15. Re:Economics working as usual. by hey! · · Score: 1

      But like usual, basic economics will take care of the situtation for us.

      No. Basic economics will take care that the resources are, by its own internal criteria, distributed efficiently. It will come up with a solution, and that solution will in a sense be efficient, but there's no guarantee that you or I or anybody we happen to know personally will consider the situation "taken care of".

      This is an important distinction to grasp, because the benefits of market efficiency are so great, we tend to start thinking of the market as benevolent. It's not. The way economic history is taught tends to lead us that way too. Future generations may discount our fates because of the blessings they enjoy, in a way that from our perspective is callous indeed.

      If in the process of reallocating resources after the end of oil, America becomes a third world nation, it will be because it is efficient that it be so. If everything continues on status quo, it will be efficient that it be so. The market doesn't care which way it goes.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    16. Re:Economics working as usual. by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 1

      Argh. Phil, get yer head outta yer butt. Free markets are GREAT at emergency planning. Where do you think insurance came from? And Underwriter Laboratories (established by the fire insurance companies so they wouldn't have to pay out so much for electrical fires)?

      The trouble is that you're looking at a market which is partially free, and saying that because it's partially free, it should work as well as a completely free market. That's poor economics (and something which anyone with an economics background wouldn't do). You should compare how well one market plans compared to another market which is more or less free.

      If you think that electricity markets were deregulated, then I can safely say that you were debrained at the same time.
      -russ

      --
      Don't piss off The Angry Economist
    17. Re:Economics working as usual. by Rei · · Score: 1

      Solar PV is not a simple situation at all because there is such a variety of possibilities out there. Are they using monocrystalline cells? Polycrystalline? Amorphous? Sliver? Are there concentrators? Spaced cells with reflective backplates? Heliostats? Organic cells?

      All of this factors heavily in the price per watt. Some of these techs, like sliver cells, are brand new.

      --
      It's time for Operation Crazy Plan.
    18. Re:Economics working as usual. by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 2, Insightful

      To an extent you are correct, but it is only because people are not content to let free markets work. Because no one is in control, people think that markets are not under control. So they start to coerce market participants, with the idea that they know better than them.

      Free market planning is called "speculation". If you ask people if speculation is a good thing, they'll invariably say that it's bad. That's because speculation and politics are at odds with each other for controllling society. Politicians get the upper hand in this conflict because they can claim to be working for "the people" while speculators are in it for the money. Politicians appeal to people's ignorance and emotions. So, yeah, it's not that free markets don't work, it's that people won't let them work.
      -russ

      --
      Don't piss off The Angry Economist
    19. Re:Economics working as usual. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The free market is superb for controlling the flow of commodities according to demand in the short run, however it falls flat on its face when called upon to deal with long run planning. The collective mind of the market doesn't know that we want to keep around enough petroleum to make fertilizers, chemicals, plastics, and other things at a reasonable price. It doesn't have a strategy, it only knows the law of supply and demand. That's why you always have stores with too much or too little stock of something, and it's why there are shocks to various essential commodities when there is an unexpected rise or fall in demand. The democratic-socialist countries have tried with varying degrees of success to deal with this by employing free-markets for short run commodities and central planning for long-run stuff. It doesn't work perfectly, but it does stop shocks from happening like paying 300% more next winter for heat than you did this winter. The price you pay for stability is that sometimes the prices are higher than they would be on a totally free market.

    20. Re:Economics working as usual. by hevenor · · Score: 1

      Someone with an economics background won't stop to think of how a solar panel will be built if there is no energy to build it and how a government can afford to make one if we wait for oil to rocket up to $500/barrel. Economics does not negate the need for planning.

    21. Re:Economics working as usual. by amliebsch · · Score: 1
      So, if you don't care about solar and other alternative energies, go ahead and live your little life, but don't scorn those who are trying to give you alternatives.

      There is already a perfectly fine alternative, ready to go. I'll give you a hint: it starts with "n" and ends with "uclear". The only thing holding it back is irrational fear - and if anything will cause people to get over their fear in a hurry, it's soaring fuel costs.

      --
      If you don't know where you are going, you will wind up somewhere else.
    22. Re:Economics working as usual. by Mostly+Monkey · · Score: 1

      How are we going to learn to terraform other planets unless we practice on ours first?

      --
      Chika Chik-ah... do-e ow ow.
    23. Re:Economics working as usual. by 1/137 · · Score: 1

      Ah, yes, the starry-eyed free marketeers are coming to our rescue!

      That free markets are a complete disaster is obvious to anyone with even a clumsy grasp of the actual facts of history, unless of course, we define "actual facts of history" to mean "my last reading of Atlas Shrugged ".

      One problem with your hypothesis--completely unsupported by any actual evidence by the way--is that the governments of the developed world massively subsidize the oil economy. Oooops!

      And yet another problem with your hypothesis is the fact that there is no major economic disincentive--excluding second order effects like consumer activism--to activities which are damaging to the environment. You already hear the energy industry mentioning "clean coal" for instance. It is completely clear that industry has and will pollute up to--and in many cases beyond--the limits imposed by regulations.

      Oh, but I forgot! You will just have us hand out "shares" in the atmosphere, and let the market take care of the rest. Sorry, I choose to remain here in reality!

      --
      My handle breaks slashcode, what does your handle do?
    24. Re:Economics working as usual. by PhraudulentOne · · Score: 1

      That's why we should put up a bunch of these towers. They can power the world, and we can use oil for toothbrushes.

      (http://web.archive.org/web/20030418044709/http:// www.boeing.com/assocproducts/energy/powertower.htm l)

      --
      You create your own reality - Leave mine to me.
    25. Re:Economics working as usual. by myth24601 · · Score: 1

      "And this new energy system is going to appear in a flash of capitalist magic?"

      Oil isn't going to disappear in a flash.

      I think the point the Parent post was making is that the growing price of one energy source (oil) as it becomes more and more scarce will make investment in other energy sources more economical.

      --
      No matter where you go, there you are.
    26. Re:Economics working as usual. by n54 · · Score: 1

      Sorry but I call bs on wood & ceramics being a germ breeding ground.

      Let's take the example of a chopping board. Compared to a plastic chopping board (unless you clean it with chlorine or similar nasty ideas) the wood board will have less germs (even if you wash/clean/scrub it less often - but why would anyone do that?) because the wood actually is naturally anti-bacterial. I'm sorry I have no link to provide to back this up but I've seen tests done on this.

      Now that's a chopping board which of course gets cuts and scratches from normal use (which works against the plastic ones and in favour of the wood ones), the same would go for various wooden kitchen utensils. As to other uses of wood there is absolutely no reason one cannot lacquer them (which is almost always done in some fashion or the other, even for pencils) and such finishes give anything of wood a surface texture that's usually even smoother than plastic and as such easier to clean if there is a need for it.

      Ceramics? I guess it depends on the finish as I can agree that "raw" porous ceramics without any kind of finish (think standard unglazed flower pots) would make for a nice home for germs (provided they find something to live off) but you don't really use such a flower pot as your coffee mug do you? Those nice shiny (glazed), usually humorously decorated coffee mugs, guess what, they're almost always made of ceramics... stoneware ain't no problem.

      If you have problems with germs in your coffee mug I recommend washing it more often ;) j/k (yeah I know, there's always some coworkers that like their little biology experiments lol)

      Or were you thinking of your bathroom tiles? :)

      And both women and men shaved (different places hopefully) before the invention of plastic (or Gilette) whitout getting broken glass in their bathtubs... believe it or not most people did not (have to) look like hairballs before you and I (or even our grandparents) were born lol :)

      --
      this additional sig includes a portrait of Mohammed in support of freedom of expression, feel free to reproduce it

      --
      this comment is provided "as is" and without any express or implied legibility or congruity [...]
    27. Re:Economics working as usual. by intnsred · · Score: 1

      So often we hear fuss about our petrol supply running out. Sure, perhaps someday it will.

      I'd hate to break the news to you, but running out of oil is not the issue -- peaking world oil production is the issue.

      Modern capitalism is based on growth. Our economic system is based on oil. Once oil production peaks, oil demand will continue to grow and production will continually fall.

      The absolutely most optimistic prediction of when world oil production will peak is that of the US gov't, which says it'll peak 2035 or so.

      Oil industry experts and most other countries put the oil production peak much sooner. Most say world oil production will peak somewhere between now and 2015. That is very close.

      But what the US fears is that once the peak hits, the vast majority of the world's remaining oil will be in Russia (which cannot be bullied and has its own interests) and in OPEC countries.

      There is a reason why the US gov't is engaged in wars to take control of the Middle East's oil. This strategy is advocated by both Republican and Democrat geopolitical thinkers from the mid-90s on. The present US administration is filled with neo-cons who publicly endorsed this strategy in the 90s.

      But like usual, basic economics will take care of the situtation for us.

      What economics? The article does not illustrate the "magical" and "wonderful" workings of the so-called "free market"!

      What does the article describe? It describes a large gov't-funded program to build the world's largest solar system. That isn't capitalism, that's socialism.

    28. Re:Economics working as usual. by Eccles · · Score: 1

      Free markets are GREAT at emergency planning. Where do you think insurance came from?

      Most flood insurance? The government. Bank deposit insurance? The government. Pensions? You got it...

      (I remember you, Russ, when you were a near-Socialist, so it's fun to spar with the new Russ...)

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    29. Re:Economics working as usual. by HermanAB · · Score: 1

      It is not that simple. Mostly what is done is that the oil is simply distilled into various streams of thin, thick and syruppy stuff, all the way to hard waxes. Some fractionating is done to change the mix, but if the car fuel use dominates, then restricting the use of plastics isn't going to make much difference in the consumption of crude oil for example.

      --
      Oh well, what the hell...
    30. Re:Economics working as usual. by DeveloperAdvantage · · Score: 1

      I am not an expert on this, but in natural ecosystems, populations are often cyclic. Populations, and their consumption of resources, rise PAST the level that their natural resources will allow them to sustain, and then populations crash. There is always an overshoot and there is always a messy correction. It is very optimistic to think it will be any different with people and our natural environment, and this goes way beyond economics or planned economies or free economies. Economies are not "free", they are constained by physical and biological laws, many of which we don't know yet or understand.

      --
      FREE - Java, J2EE and Ajax Audiobooks for Software Developers - www.DeveloperAdvantage.com
    31. Re:Economics working as usual. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod parent up, this is a really interesting post for crying out loud. Something more than a typical /. kneejerk reaction. This site sucks some times.

    32. Re:Economics working as usual. by benjamindees · · Score: 1

      Wood or no wood, what makes you think you'll get a toothbrush? Oil is an external economic input and in that sense it has no substitution. Something will have to give. If your wood toothbrush costs more than a plastic one does today, you'll have to do without something else to get it.

      This is a zero sum game. I wish more people understood that. While there may be technical substitutes for oil products such as plastics, there are no economic substitutes. Make no mistake: life will be worse when the oil is gone.

      --
      "I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"
    33. Re:Economics working as usual. by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 1

      You can't get insurance for something which has 100% chance of happening. Only a government would be stupid enough to sell flood insurance to people living on a flood plain. Bank deposit insurance? Who could tell if there's a market for it when the government gives it away for free? As Bill Gates is no doubt noticing, it's hard to compete with gratis. I don't know what percentage of pensions are privately funded; however when the government guarantees pensions none of them are *really* privately funded.

      If you'll notice, it's always the federal government that does the dumbest things. That's because they're a monopoly. State governments aren't anywhere near as stupid because they know that people will just move to a state run by less greedy people.
      -russ

      --
      Don't piss off The Angry Economist
    34. Re:Economics working as usual. by Phillip2 · · Score: 1

      Insurance is not about planning for emergencies. It's alliviating the effects of
      emergencies post-hoc.

      The electricity market in various countries is relatively free, although, obviously,
      it depends on the country. Of course, it's not totally free. Like any industry
      which requires substantial infrastructure inside a city, then it's not possible
      to be completely so. Water, roads, even radio/cell broadcasts, are always going to
      require some degree of government involvement, or they will tend toward natural
      monopoly.

      Of course, you can always look at deregulated markets, and say "but they don't work
      because they are not REALLY free". But this covers most markets, which reduces the
      bounds for discussion.

      Phil

    35. Re:Economics working as usual. by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 1

      So you agree with Malthus that we ran out of food a hundred years ago and millions died? Or are you agreeing with Paul Ehrlich that we ran out of food twenty years ago and billions died?

      Seems to me like predictions like the one you just made have a very bad history of not coming true. I won't try to stop you from making this prediction, but I'd bet against it coming true.
      -russ

      --
      Don't piss off The Angry Economist
    36. Re:Economics working as usual. by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 1

      Of course, you can always look at deregulated markets, and say "but they don't work
      because they are not REALLY free".


      Yeah, except that's the No True Scotsman fallacy. Better, instead to look at a "deregulated" market and see how the deregulation was done. If it arms the sheep so they can compete on equal basis with wolves, that's one thing. If they free the sheep but doesn't pen in the wolves, you're just asking for trouble. In California, the retail price was freed but the wholesale price constrained. We all know what trouble THAT caused.

      By the way, I support the right to keep and arm bears, and other wildlife. Give them a fighting chance.
      -russ

      --
      Don't piss off The Angry Economist
    37. Re:Economics working as usual. by Phillip2 · · Score: 1

      "Yeah, except that's the No True Scotsman fallacy"

      Yes, which is why I objected to it's original use.

      Your points about California may be correct; actually I have no idea
      at all. I was trying to make a general point and the world is much
      larger than California. The privitisation of the energy market
      in the UK has lead to a drop in surplus generating capacity, as with
      many other countries in Europe. So it seems a feature.

      Phil

  3. Solar Energy Becoming More Pervasive... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Since we got rid of that evil Mr. Burns and his sun blocker. Not to mention all that incessant hooting.

    1. Re:Solar Energy Becoming More Pervasive... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the "Solar" category on the Treehugger blog contains tons of solar stories:

      http://www.treehugger.com/files/solar/

  4. Global Warming by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 1
    Solar Energy Becoming More Pervasive

    It's that "Global Warming" thing. The sun is out!

    --
    "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
    1. Re:Global Warming by smittyoneeach · · Score: 1

      No worries. When the madmen start laying down the nukes, the fallout will drive up the albedo, cooling the planet. So we got that goin' for us.

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
  5. I thought that... by TubeSteak · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I thought that there are other more efficient ways to harness solar energy.

    Like polishing up a bunch of mirrors and focusing them on a source of water. You boil the water, steam spins a turbine and you get electricity.

    Do solar panels really give us the most bang for the buck?

    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
    1. Re:I thought that... by sonofagunn · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah, that would fit on the roof of a Prius.

    2. Re:I thought that... by stunt_penguin · · Score: 1

      If you're going to generate a given amount of hot water, why not use it for heating and bathing anyway? A significant proportion of our energy usage goes on heating & hot water anyway.

      --
      When the posters fear their moderators, there is tyranny; when the moderators fears the posters, there is liberty.
    3. Re:I thought that... by nizo · · Score: 1

      That is an interesting idea, except that transmitting the hot water is a pain. For people living close to the plant, they would get water that would probably fry you in a few seconds (not so good for showers), while people further away wouldn't get any heat at all, since the heat would have been lost while in transit along the uninsulated pipes. You could insulate the whole system, but that would add quite a bit to the cost. One other issue is you would also have to deal with usage problems (too much extra hot water at 2am, and not enough when everyone turns on their shower at 8am). Now if power was more decentralized (say, each section of town had its own powerplant) this would be more viable.

    4. Re:I thought that... by LaCosaNostradamus · · Score: 1

      This is the start of a sound argument FOR public utilities in the American Western states to indulge in this kind of electricity generation. Whatever non-profitable-ness exists in such a system can be laid to rest by having it publicized.

      You'd figure that companies would have built many of these facilities to serve the overloaded California market. But they haven't. This clear example only proves that the "free market" does NOT apply to everything, and that public facilities are entirely valid in several applications.

      --
      [You have a stable society when some nut guns down a schoolyard and the law doesn't change.]
    5. Re:I thought that... by 0xABADC0DA · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Indeed. Back when (for perspective) I calculated the Iraq War as being worth about 105 replacement world trade towers, adjusted for inflation, I also calculated the investment in terms of solar energy. Using existing solar boiler technology (in use in smallish generator arrays) it came to about 5% of our totaly energy use per year of all sources of energy, coal + solar + nuclear + oil.

      In short, by now we have doubled the spending that was based on and we could have had upwards of 10% of our energy from green solar power. Of course there are problems such as solar not being available at night or in bad weather, and taking a lot of space in the desert, and transmitting the power. Of course you can store power during the day at some loss and the largest power demand is during the day for air conditioning. I didn't calculate the space it would take however, but there's a *lot* of desert in the southwest that gets a *lot* of sun.

      But anyway these objections are largely missing the point that we've been screwed by the retards in office who are openly hostile towards science. $400 billion buys a lot of solar plant, or a lot of solar cell research, or a lot of wind turbines, etc. Instead we have jack to show for it.

    6. Re:I thought that... by nizo · · Score: 1

      I keep hoping solar towers will take off, but it looks like these guys might run out of money before they can get their full-scale plant off the ground :-(

    7. Re:I thought that... by stunt_penguin · · Score: 1

      Oh? Aha, I meant that each house would heat its own water via a roof panel and a heat exchanger- the water would go up to the roof at 2-3 degrees C and come back at maybe 10-15 degrees, then it'd be put through a heat exchanger to produce water at around 70-80 degrees, which is I think about right for domestic consumption

      Systems like this already exist and work well even in cold climates. Also, geothermal heat exchangers work well even in areas with permafrost- geothermal exchangers use a water/antifreeze which gets chilled to subzero temparatures and pumped underground to return at a few degrees above zero- they're very efficient and at Irish energy prices pay for themselves in 5-6 years. My super-simple diagram is at http://www.mhac.biz/geothermal.htm

      BTW the pipes don't go far underground, they might do 10-15 laps around the garden, 5-6 meters underground and come back in with the heat of the earth.

      With the cost of energy going up and the cost of generating your own energy coming down, I think we'll start to see more and more people in the west becoming more independant of the Grid system- using maybe 20% of what they use now and generating the rest of their energy in whatever way suits them or the time of year- californian suburbanites with solar panels, Idaho farmers with a few turbines each, that kind of thing. The grid system is, I think, a product of the past and something we'll learn to get away from- it makes more sense from my POV

      Also, the spread of low cost local power generation methods could see that nightime map of the earth become a bit brighter in the developing world, as it won't take as massive a infrastructural investment to supply power to a village in, say, subsaharan africa.

      --
      When the posters fear their moderators, there is tyranny; when the moderators fears the posters, there is liberty.
    8. Re:I thought that... by RevMike · · Score: 1

      ConEd (Consolidated Edison), the primary electric utility in New York City, actually pipes steam around much of downtown and midtown Manhattan. This steam is used to for heat and to generate hot water for many of the office towers in the area.

    9. Re:I thought that... by randomErr · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I believe you are correct in that solar towers are more efficient. But I think the reason the military is using solar panels is three fold.

      First, in the event of an attack it would be drop a set of solar panels into a bunker then drop a tower with steaming hot water down into silo.

      Second, a series of panels produce a lot less heater. Without a central source of heat, heat seekers would have trouble locking onto target.

      Third the panels would stretch out over miles and work independent of each other. If an attack would happen on one section of solar nodes, the other sections would still keep working.

      --
      You say things that offend me and I can deal with it. Can you?
    10. Re:I thought that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The reason public utilities were originally conceived was because there is a large start-up cost that in many cases the market will not bear. C-level execs at the energy trading companies are looking to make money next quarter to keep their jobs -- the cannot afford to invest for 10 years out becauseif they do their office will have been redecorated by new inhabitants 3 times over. This is what's wrong with *privatized* energy infrastructure.

    11. Re:I thought that... by rolfwind · · Score: 1
      In short, by now we have doubled the spending that was based on and we could have had upwards of 10% of our energy from green solar power. Of course there are problems such as solar not being available at night or in bad weather, and taking a lot of space in the desert, and transmitting the power. Of course you can store power during the day at some loss and the largest power demand is during the day for air conditioning. I didn't calculate the space it would take however, but there's a *lot* of desert in the southwest that gets a *lot* of sun.


      Of course, you can always use solar on the acres of roofs across the country, much of which is covered by a black tarry substance that contributes to electric bills going up in the summer when the air conditioner is turned on:) No long distance transmission is needed.

      Speaking of roofs, many commercial building (Home Depots, SuperMarkets) have flat ones that would be perfect to have a few parabolic dishes with stirling engine generators or perhaps just a PV layout to power themselves.

      And there are application somewhat independent of time, such as the home heating of water (which could also heat the house if us Americans ever get away from the inferior forced air heating (asthma, breathing problems, sinuses) back to radiant heat) - which various solar technologies can take of in this day and age.

      Solar could take care of more than 10%.
    12. Re:I thought that... by budgenator · · Score: 1

      That was done quite a bit before the big regonal electric grids were developed. Our Detroit Edison Marysville MI plant used to sell wet steam to either Diamond Crystal or Morton salt; the salt plant is gone now but the pipes are still there.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    13. Re:I thought that... by budgenator · · Score: 1

      California and free market are an oxymoron, at least as far as public utilities are concerned. Californians are very eco-conscience but aren't very good at prioritising ecological concerns; so any project is stalled over trivialities. My state is probably 2nd or 3rd in this thinking as well. It's easy for people to say we need this but not in my backyard.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
  6. What driving? by www.sorehands.com · · Score: 1

    What driving conditions are they talking about? Is this just driving around or is the the typical work commute -- drive to work, sit in a parking lot all day, drive home?

    1. Re:What driving? by bahwi · · Score: 1

      Hm, with the right Hybrid car that situation, as long as it's sitting in the sun all day, the gas engine would probably not kick in if you live decently close to work. That'd be good gas savings. =) 5 days out of the week maybe a gallon or two. I forget which but some Hybrids kick their gas engine on only when the need more energy. If you did it right(no quick starts, etc..) you could even avoid burning fuel at all, depending on rain or not, etc...

    2. Re:What driving? by shotfeel · · Score: 1

      I forget which but some Hybrids kick their gas engine on only when the need more energy.

      No, as I understand it, most hybrids are primarily powered by the engine. The batteries essentially act as a sync for excess energy produced (like when going down hill) and supply power when most needed (going up a hill or accelerating). The combination also allows the engine to be stopped when the car isn't moving (like at a stoplight).

  7. Hybrids/Electic purity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These things will never sell until the cars themselves make the right noise.

    The major selling point for any car is image. Thus these hybrids need more grunt in their exhaust. Who wants a silent car? We want a car with a soundtrack to be noticed by.

    1. Re:Hybrids/Electic purity by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "These things will never sell until the cars themselves make the right noise. The major selling point for any car is image. Thus these hybrids need more grunt in their exhaust. Who wants a silent car? We want a car with a soundtrack to be noticed by."

      Hear, hear!!

      Half the fun of a good performance car (or motorcycle) is the exhaust note?

      I used to love to drive my last car down the French Quarter or parking garages, it was such a low, bassy note that I'd set off car alarms all that were set way too sensitive.

      Was good for a laugh....

      But, if I'm gonna spend $30K or more on a car, I want it to look sharp, drive fast, handle, and sound great.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    2. Re:Hybrids/Electic purity by CyricZ · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's widely known that those men want want loud and/or fast cars are often the men with the smallest penises.

      It is also widely known that compared to other men, American men have by far the smallest penises in the world. They try to make up for their genital deficit by driving the biggest, nosiest vehicles they can debt themselves into.

      Frankly, I'm glad I'm European, and I ride a bicycle. The only problem I run into is keeping my cock from getting tangled in the bike chain.

      --
      Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
    3. Re:Hybrids/Electic purity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The other great thing about Europeans is their extensive imaginations. They have such rich fantasy lives.

    4. Re:Hybrids/Electic purity by bahwi · · Score: 1

      Not for me, give me a Diesel/Hybrid and watch it go Bio-Diesel. Diesel/Hybrids(the clean kind of Diesel that's supposed to his US markets in the next few years) get about 70-80mpg already, then switch it to Bio-Diesel(which normally gives another 5 to 10mpg depending on the type, or none at all). Suddendly you're paying 10c/gallon for 70+ mpg.

      Even at 60mpg @ 10c(est cost of making it at home) you're doing pretty damn good.

      Dio Diesel/Hybrids and Retail Fueling Sites are good places to look too, but it's probably better to make it yourself.

    5. Re:Hybrids/Electic purity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This comment is obviously not from a European, but a Frenchman. (I know, I know EU, but ask any europe citizen what they think of France)

      I guess you ride a bike because without the Saddam oil-for-food grifting you cannot afford a car!

    6. Re:Hybrids/Electic purity by geoffrey+crawford · · Score: 1

      Or perhaps they enjoy the awe of controlling mass amount of power. Something so powerful it'll kill you with one driving mistake.

      It's like skydiving. You don't have to spend money to go fast either. I'm building a twin-turbo 351w Mustang on a college budget. It's a technical challenge and a hobby.

    7. Re:Hybrids/Electic purity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll happily run your big ass penis over with my little penis SUV

    8. Re:Hybrids/Electic purity by ergo98 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Thus these hybrids need more grunt in their exhaust. Who wants a silent car? We want a car with a soundtrack to be noticed by.

      If by we you mean 16 year old dateless wonders, then sure. Most of the rest of the world wants as silent of a car as they can find, which is why the vast majority of new cars are completely silent. Of course perception does matter, and the reality is that many of the people who buy pure hybrids do so because of the image...that image being an Earth conscious green.

    9. Re:Hybrids/Electic purity by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      If you're going to spend more than $30k on a car, then one would think a simple speaker with an MP3 player of engine emission sounds would suffice....

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    10. Re:Hybrids/Electic purity by CyricZ · · Score: 0

      I'd recommend against driving your tiny-penis SUV into my cock. As large as your SUV is, my twig is still larger. I would hate to see your SUV's airbag deploy, pushing your genitalia into you such that they form a vagina.

      --
      Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
    11. Re:Hybrids/Electic purity by zoomzit · · Score: 1
      Hmmm... Your post leads me to ponder the following correlation:

      It is also widely known that compared to other men, European men have by far the smallest brains in the world. They try to make up for their genetic deficit by being biggest, nosiest and dumbest arrogant bastards known to humankind.

      Even if you do have a large penis, that fact alone in no way implies that you have the intellegence to use it correctly.

    12. Re:Hybrids/Electic purity by flyinwhitey · · Score: 1

      "Most of the rest of the world wants as silent of a car as they can find, which is why the vast majority of new cars are completely silent."

      I'm not going to get into politics here, as much as you might like, but the reason most new cars are "silent" (they're not, they're actually quiteloud from the OUTSIDE) is because the most common type of engine, a 4 cylinder, has a terrible exhaust note.

      Funny though how you automatically assumed the "rest of the world" shared your ignorance.

      --
      How pathetic are you that you follow me from topic to topic and waste all your mod points at once modding me down?
    13. Re:Hybrids/Electic purity by Tweekster · · Score: 1

      oh you mean like those idiots that spend $500 to make their exhaust sound as if you punched a hole in it with a screwdriver... or so that it sounds like a hedge trimmer....

      either way, you might be getting noticed but it is because people are laughing at you

      --
      The phrase "more better" is acceptable English. suck it grammar Nazis
    14. Re:Hybrids/Electic purity by jd142 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Who wants a silent car? We want a car with a soundtrack to be noticed by.

      I want a silent car. I don't want or need to be noticed by everyone, just as long as I'm not literally invisible so they run in to me. ;)

      I feel no need to impress people on the street with the sound of my car's motor. Don't care what they think.

    15. Re:Hybrids/Electic purity by pclminion · · Score: 1
      These things will never sell until the cars themselves make the right noise.

      They should make them sound like a Wraith Dart. I'd drive that, no question about it.

    16. Re:Hybrids/Electic purity by CentraSpike · · Score: 1

      Totally off topic, but my '74 Alfa GTV is a 4 cylinder and the exhaust note is music to my ears (when it's actually running - which it isn't at the moment, grrr)

    17. Re:Hybrids/Electic purity by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "If you're going to spend more than $30k on a car, then one would think a simple speaker with an MP3 player of engine emission sounds would suffice...."

      Well, is a little more than sound I guess...it is sound and 'feel'...

      Not very quantitative I know...but, it is that 'thing' that fuels performance car lust...

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    18. Re:Hybrids/Electic purity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But in previous posts, you've admitted you can't get your penis up any more!

    19. Re:Hybrids/Electic purity by LightningBolt! · · Score: 1

      Thus these hybrids need more grunt in their exhaust.

      If you want more grunt in your exhaust, just eat more beans. The people around you will appreciate it just about as much as they appreciate that cheesy loud "muffler" on your Civic.

      --
      Old people fall. Young people spring. Rich people summer and winter.
    20. Re:Hybrids/Electic purity by dlZ · · Score: 1

      I'm not going to get into politics here, as much as you might like, but the reason most new cars are "silent" (they're not, they're actually quiteloud from the OUTSIDE) is because the most common type of engine, a 4 cylinder, has a terrible exhaust note.

      My 4 banger makes sort of a "WEEEEEEEEEEEeeeeee!" noise, and that's with everything stock. I'm sure if I put a new exhaust system I could sound more like a pack of angry bees and less like a hyper squirrel, though. I'd rather not make my car look like a Matchbox Car, though. But no matter what, my car will never sound "mean."

      I drive a 4 cylinder 95 Honda Accord, btw. When I bought it, having a "mean" and fast car wasn't my #1 priority.

      --
      rm -rf ./evidence @ punkcomp
    21. Re:Hybrids/Electic purity by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      I understand the feel- but given a good butt-thumper system, you get the sound and the feel, and if you key the playback to acceleration/deceleration rates, it is potentially possible to simulate any given sound/vibration/accelleration "hear and feel" in an electric vehicle. The only thing missing for me would be the clutch- or for that matter, the transmission...in a good electric vehicle, gears are no longer neccessary.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    22. Re:Hybrids/Electic purity by CentraSpike · · Score: 1

      It has been suggested that silent cars might result in more accidents involving pedestrians as they don't hear them coming and could potentially step into roads in front of them - seems a little over the top, but i'm guessing you're a conscientious type and wouldn't like that to happen.

    23. Re:Hybrids/Electic purity by ergo98 · · Score: 1

      I'm not going to get into politics here, as much as you might like

      Uh...okay. That really makes sense in the context of my message...or not.

      I'm not going to get into politics here, as much as you might like, but the reason most new cars are "silent" (they're not, they're actually quiteloud from the OUTSIDE) is because the most common type of engine, a 4 cylinder, has a terrible exhaust note.

      That's ignorant on so many levels. Nonetheless, why don't you peruse the inventory of the most successful cars at your local car dealer, and tell me which of them has a "soundtrack to get noticed by". Many of the most powerful cars on the road - the ones that will stomp the pissy little testosterone-supplement that the kids drive - are absolutely silent at anything other than full throttle.

    24. Re:Hybrids/Electic purity by steevc · · Score: 1

      Ditto.

      Those who stick a loud pipe on their car think that the people looking at them are impressed, but I bet they are thinking something else. I'd just like to see the police pulling more of them over. At least you get some warning that there's an idiot nearby.

      I'd be embarrassed to drive a loud car, especially when coming home late at night. I don't think my neighbours would appreciate it.

      Didn't someone sell a gadget that gave you 'big car' noise through your speakers? I'm sure it was linked to the rev counter and could simulate different engines.

    25. Re:Hybrids/Electic purity by mamba-mamba · · Score: 1

      Wow. That "make your own biodiesel" site is cool.

      But I'm not sure where you are getting the 10 cents per gallon from. I didn't read the entire site, but I did browse through it and I didn't see a cost estimate.

      Is that based on getting used cooking oil for free from a restaraunt or fast-food joint?

      MM

      --
      By including this sig, the copyright holders of this work or collection unreservedly place it in the public domain.
    26. Re:Hybrids/Electic purity by jd142 · · Score: 1

      Heh. I live in a college town. The students would step in front of a jumbo jet with full power to the engines. They don't care who they walk in front of and because there are so many of them crossing the streets between classes, for the 10 minutes between classes traffic pretty much comes to a standstill.

      Besides, there's a difference between not wanting someone to hit me and not caring if I hit someone. ;)

    27. Re:Hybrids/Electic purity by budgenator · · Score: 1

      No way what you want is a 4 cylinder offenhauser breathing through 3 inch headers and twin glass-pack mufflers, idling at 500 RPM

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    28. Re:Hybrids/Electic purity by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "The only thing missing for me would be the clutch- or for that matter, the transmission...in a good electric vehicle, gears are no longer neccessary."

      Oh man...I'd not even thought about that one!! Hell, that's half the fun of a sports car!!

      I've never owned a non-standard transmission car before....

      Damn...some of the 'advances' of the future, sure take the fun out of things we enjoy now in 'primitive' life.

      :-(

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    29. Re:Hybrids/Electic purity by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      No way what you want is a 4 cylinder offenhauser breathing through 3 inch headers and twin glass-pack mufflers, idling at 500 RPM

      And this would be different from a piston speaker thumping the floor at 33.33 hz exactly how?

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    30. Re:Hybrids/Electic purity by budgenator · · Score: 1

      The 4 cylinder offenhauser is just mind-numbingly macho at 500 RPM, if you don't understand the difference, you probably never will. Maybe it's because i grew up listening to race cars with these engines screaming arround the track at indy.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    31. Re:Hybrids/Electic purity by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      The 4 cylinder offenhauser is just mind-numbingly macho at 500 RPM, if you don't understand the difference, you probably never will. Maybe it's because i grew up listening to race cars with these engines screaming arround the track at indy.

      And my point is, we can simulate ALL of that- the sound, the vibration, if you really wanted to, you could fix up some sort of software governor system between the batteries and the engine to require you to press a clutch and shift to change the RPM range of the foot pedal. I'm willing to bet that with enough work, you could simulate all of that "mind-numbingly macho" and then some in an electric vehicle....

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    32. Re:Hybrids/Electic purity by vertinox · · Score: 1

      They should make them sound like a Wraith Dart.

      Yeah, but I'd rather have a car made out of replicators.

      Never have to take it to the shop again... That is if it hasn't destroyed all life on the planet first.

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    33. Re:Hybrids/Electic purity by iphayd · · Score: 1

      Umm, wear some pants. That way you only look wierd for being a grown guy on a little kid's bike, not a naked grown guy on a little kid's bike with his pecker tied up in the chain.

    34. Re:Hybrids/Electic purity by The+Lynxpro · · Score: 1

      "It is also widely known that compared to other men, American men have by far the smallest penises in the world. They try to make up for their genital deficit by driving the biggest, nosiest vehicles they can debt themselves into."

      Wow, you are both delusional and ironic at the same time. Funny thing is, the average American condom is larger than its European counterpart. First, the German government complained to the European Union about the size of American condoms being too large. Once the European Union finalized the standards EU wide for condoms, again the German government complained about the condoms being too large.

      So much about your fantasy about deficient American penile size.

      --
      "Right now, somewhere in this world, Scott Baio is plowing a woman he doesn't love," - Peter Griffin, *Family Guy*
    35. Re:Hybrids/Electic purity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "dumbest arrogant bastards known to humankind" ? You attributing that to Europeans? Based on that and the news from the US (ID, GWB, Wars..) I'd say that Americans must be the most delusional, then.

    36. Re:Hybrids/Electic purity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, this piece of news/trivia doesn't specifically mention Germans, but does state some other European countries vs. the US.. (Maybe the Germans just like a better fit and don't like to pretend otherwise?)

    37. Re:Hybrids/Electic purity by fast+penguin · · Score: 1

      I'm European (Portuguese) and though France would not be my favorite country to live, I don't have any problem with french people -- I can't possibly think of what you mean. Anyway, I actually find their accent quite sexy for women. :P And France are not of the countries that have the higher usage of bikes: look at The Netherlands, Germany or Denmark for that.

      --
      My worst enemy gave me a copy of Windows for Christmas.
    38. Re:Hybrids/Electic purity by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      I've never owned a non-standard transmission car before....

      Well, I suppose you could always simulate it in software- a clutch pedal that "disengages" the current setting, move the stick to a new setting, let up the clutch, and the power range of your accelerator changes....complete with an OD setting for people who don't want to bother...kind of like the autostick on a Nash Rambler....

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  8. Solar is big.. by dotpavan · · Score: 1, Insightful

    .. remember the alternative sun being created by (or attempted by) the Chinese? But, solar and wind energy (unlike say Hydrogen) are so region specific, that they impose problems for wide-spread acceptability. And there arent any means found to store them successfully.

    1. Re:Solar is big.. by evilviper · · Score: 1
      I can't believe you got moderated up for this drivel.

      .. remember the alternative sun being created by (or attempted by) the Chinese?

      No, I don't remember the Chinese trying to create a star.

      But, solar and wind energy (unlike say Hydrogen) are so region specific, that they impose problems for wide-spread acceptability.

      Hydrogen isn't an energy source, it's energy storage (a battery). Wind and solar are energy sources, not storage methods. The two are not mutually exclusive, nor inextricably tied to each other. So what was your point?

      And there arent any means found to store them successfully.

      It is very easy to store electricity. There are many, many options to chose from:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_storage#Storag e_methods

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    2. Re:Solar is big.. by dotpavan · · Score: 1
      No, I don't remember the Chinese trying to create a star.

      Here it is.

      And storing electricity isnt that effective as using stored fossil fuels. Right now, there isnt THAT big focus because the end of carbon-based fuels isnt atleast near to 200 years, and the perception is: we could go slower (in research) till it is very much on our neck

    3. Re:Solar is big.. by heinousjay · · Score: 1

      Pssst. Your ignorance is hanging out. Tuck that back in, man.

      --
      Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
    4. Re:Solar is big.. by skintigh2 · · Score: 1

      I don't remember the Chinese making a star, but I did see that episode where the Air Force blew up a star with a stargate opened to a black hole...

      Anyway, solar isn't as regional as you think. Solar water heaters will work in any state except Alaska all winter long, as long as you shovel the snow off of them. Hopefully sometime soon photovoltaic cells will be efficient enough to them practical in Northern states.

      As for storage, there is no need for storage. With personally owned equipment you just sell your excess back to the grid for profit or credit for rainy days. Literllay. For large scale plants, if they actually were in the predicament of having too much power (unlikely) then just turn off one of the 1960's coal turbines for a while.

      As for hydrogen, it's all hype. It's also an (extremely inefficient) form of storage, not a source.

    5. Re:Solar is big.. by evilviper · · Score: 1
      And storing electricity isnt that effective as using stored fossil fuels.

      Errrm... What? Apples aren't as effective as Oranges?

      By what metric are you TRYING to compare the two?

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  9. Let's triple the petrol cost. by CyricZ · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Let's triple or quadruple the cost of petrol, for instance, perhaps due to a stagnant American economy or an American attack on Iran. Now you may just see some benefits to such a system. Of course, if the prices rise quickly on such an essential commodity, things might change relatively fast. You may not have a job to drive to, for instance.

    --
    Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
    1. Re:Let's triple the petrol cost. by chris+macura · · Score: 1

      Oil is used for a damn sight more than just gasoline. Fake fur, plastics, etc. Even if we go green tommorow, we will still need oil. One gallon of crude gives three coats.

      Unfortunately, the problem is greater than just new sources of energy.

    2. Re:Let's triple the petrol cost. by Alex+P+Keaton+in+da · · Score: 2

      Har- what about good old love of the planet. I am by no means stereotypical environmentalist, but even when i lived in an apartment where the heat was included in the resnt, I still turned down the heat while I was gone for the day and while I slept. (Although that cost me nothing in terms of $$$)
      Recycling is an effort where I live, but I do it anyway.

      --
      And All I Ask is a Tall Ship And a Star to Steer Her By
    3. Re:Let's triple the petrol cost. by Average_Joe_Sixpack · · Score: 1

      Of course, if the prices rise quickly on such an essential commodity, things might change relatively fast.
       
      Yeah, like the ability to afford food since most population is hundreds of miles away from the farm belt and has to have their food trucked in.

    4. Re:Let's triple the petrol cost. by LaCosaNostradamus · · Score: 1

      Turning down the heat even when it's supplied "free" with the apartment is also an action of self-interest, since rising heat bills will cause your landlord to consider raising the rent.

      --
      [You have a stable society when some nut guns down a schoolyard and the law doesn't change.]
    5. Re:Let's triple the petrol cost. by geekee · · Score: 1

      "Let's triple or quadruple the cost of petrol, for instance, perhaps due to a stagnant American economy or an American attack on Iran."

      Actually, a tripling of the price of fuel would kill the US economy, but not the other way around. A stagnant American economy means less demand for fuel, which should result in a lowering of the price. Unless you're talking about a weak dollar, I'm not sure why you come to the conclusion you stated. I think you have cause and effect reversed. An American attack on Iran would have a serious effect on gas prices though.

      --
      Vote for Pedro
    6. Re:Let's triple the petrol cost. by B3ryllium · · Score: 1

      Come on, man. Hemp can handle most of that. Go green! :)

    7. Re:Let's triple the petrol cost. by Rei · · Score: 3, Informative

      A good polyurethane substitute can be produced from soy. Most plastics, lubricants, hydraulic fluids, artificial rubbers, and the host of other petroleum products critical to modern society don't have very good biosubstitutes.

      However, if power becomes cheap, that's not a problem. Hydrogen + CO + pressure and heat produces a mixture of various hydrocarbons; that's how the Nazis produced oil late in WWII.

      --
      It's time for Operation Crazy Plan.
    8. Re:Let's triple the petrol cost. by thehubbell · · Score: 1

      You still only save $2001 dollars. Plus if you plan on driving it 200,000 miles that would take most people about 14 years. Plus if you put the money you were going to spend on the solar panel in say Oil stock and got a measly 12% return (below most market average returns) you would have over $10,000. You could almost by a few acres of very rural land and protect that part of the environment.

    9. Re:Let's triple the petrol cost. by greg_barton · · Score: 1

      You may not have a job to drive to, for instance.

      In that case having a car which you can use for short trips with essentially zero fuel costs (driving on charge only) becomes rather appealing.

    10. Re:Let's triple the petrol cost. by kfg · · Score: 2, Insightful

      . . .if the prices rise quickly on such an essential commodity, things might change relatively fast.

      Like, because the production of solar cells is inherently energy intensive their cost is going to rise proportionate the rise in oil prices.

      The essential problem is that it's always going to be easier and cheaper in the short run to use stored energy than it is to live on a budget of incoming energy.

      KFG

    11. Re:Let's triple the petrol cost. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I'm skeptical about a good polyurethane substitute - polyurethane is one of the most stable things we have around, which is why it's used so frequently for automotive paint today. Anything that can take the abuse that auto paint does has to be damned impressive.

      On the other hand, these days you can even get bio-based motor oil that is rated for diesel. If I could figure out where to get it in the US, I would, but last I checked it's not resold here at all. It's advantageous because it's more compatible with WVO and biodiesel.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    12. Re:Let's triple the petrol cost. by stupidfoo · · Score: 1

      And we harvest soy using machines running diesel by farmers who live in homes heated by oil.

    13. Re:Let's triple the petrol cost. by chris+macura · · Score: 1

      The Nazis used coal which they converted into Oil.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Petroleum

    14. Re:Let's triple the petrol cost. by John+Hurliman · · Score: 1

      Somewhat pedantic, but homes in a mild climate ideal for soy crops are more efficiently heated with an electric heat pump than an oil furnace.

    15. Re:Let's triple the petrol cost. by Chagrin · · Score: 1

      In reality, the most predominate alternative is a wood burning stove (well, for heating only).

      I believe the rule of thumb is that 10 acres of forest will provide enough firewood for a single family for a year while regenerating at the same rate that it is consumed.

      --

      I/O Error G-17: Aborting Installation

    16. Re:Let's triple the petrol cost. by njh · · Score: 1

      And to be pedantic, heat pumps in the US have about the same CO2 and oil efficiency as burning oil :)

    17. Re:Let's triple the petrol cost. by shmlco · · Score: 2, Interesting

      To quote, "ExxonMobil announced $36 billion in profits -- in profits -- last year. That's three billion dollars every month, which if ExxonMobil were a country would make it the 90th richest country in the world. This astronomical number is a 42-percent increase from last year's record-breaking profits. Chevron also bested its record profits for the second year in a row, raking in $27.4 billion in 2005. This is, once again, the company's highest profits in its 126-year history."

      --
      Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
    18. Re:Let's triple the petrol cost. by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 1

      If the price of oil goes up that much the price of manufacture of those panels does as well (not to the same degree, but you would be surprised).

      --

      --

      WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
    19. Re:Let's triple the petrol cost. by Rei · · Score: 1

      Yes. And do you know how they did that? C (from coal) + H2O + heat and pressure -> CO + H2. CO + H2 + heat and pressure -> various hydrocarbons (mostly methane) + H2O.

      --
      It's time for Operation Crazy Plan.
    20. Re:Let's triple the petrol cost. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This will be why the Nazis had so much spare fuel they were able to power their new jet interceptors and bombers and defeat the Allied forces...

    21. Re:Let's triple the petrol cost. by chris+macura · · Score: 1

      The point is that one day we'll run out of coal as well. Using coal instead of oil isn't really going to help. Plus it's probably going to be much more expensive than just sucking the oil from the ground.

  10. what the hell? by Adult+film+producer · · Score: 1

    That's fine and dandy that the military will be benefitting from green energy.. but how about consumers? Is this why the pentagon's budget is roughly $400,000,000,000.00 ? Because they get to spend spend spend spend on any damn project they like.. what does this have to do with protecting the country from tur'ists?

    Fuck that shit... build the fucking array of photo cells and then reroute to energy straight to the heart of Vegas. You know how fucking expensive it is to run an air-conditioner during the summer.

    1. Re:what the hell? by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      By having the gov. support projects like this, it will help fund future projects that will be more ambitious that will help move us off a oil based economy. Right now, America is very vunerable to the price (and probable future boycott) of oil.

      Once this project is near done, you can bet that this group will line up Vegas and a few other cities in the area to take more energy from them. If not them, then california will.

      Finally, keep in mind that the military needs access to energy. These solar panel will help the bases there.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    2. Re:what the hell? by wildsurf · · Score: 1

      build the fucking array of photo cells and then reroute to energy straight to the heart of Vegas. You know how fucking expensive it is to run an air-conditioner during the summer.

      Have you even flown over Vegas and noticed that the roofs of most of the buildings and casinos are BLACK?? I mean, wtf are they thinking??

      Perhaps one day the roofs will be covered with these.

      --
      Weeks of coding saves hours of planning.
    3. Re:what the hell? by shotfeel · · Score: 1

      Like it or not, the military is where new tech often gets deployed first -at a cost premium.

      The advantage is that it gets the tech out there and in use, which works out many of the kinks (like cost/benefit) that allow it to then become a viable mainstream alternative. The alternative is tax incentives/breaks to get the tech mainstreamed. Either way the taxpayer pays and (hopefully) we all benefit.

    4. Re:what the hell? by budgenator · · Score: 1

      Maybe just painting the roof tops and asphalt roads white would stop global warming.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
  11. Not my kind of option... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    I'm looking for the option to solar cook turkey burgers while driving through a desert. No need to stop off at McDonalds a hundred miles away when you stop off the side of the road to fix a burger.

    1. Re:Not my kind of option... by Adult+film+producer · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You need something like this then... although it's not really suited for anything other than hotdogs. http://sci-toys.com/scitoys/scitoys/light/solar_ho tdog_cooker.html

      There are plenty of designs available for nice solar ovens & fryers.. anything collapsible is usually a little more work, but worth the effort.

    2. Re:Not my kind of option... by i.r.id10t · · Score: 1

      Do the tinfoil pouch thing on your engine block. Works great.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
    3. Re:Not my kind of option... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you can cook with your engine block. Someone on slashdot mentioned it before, but too lazy to search for it.

  12. will they stay stuck? by DeveloperAdvantage · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I suppose at 0.6mm thick and with "aircraft grade adhesive" they must stick very well, but I still can't shake the image of these going flying off while driving on the expressway. Certainly a step in the right direction though.

    --
    FREE - Java, J2EE and Ajax Audiobooks for Software Developers - www.DeveloperAdvantage.com
    1. Re:will they stay stuck? by FinestLittleSpace · · Score: 1

      I think you'll find there's a lot of bonded extras on most modern cars, that don't generally fall off unless you're stupid enough to take your car into a spinning car wash.

    2. Re:will they stay stuck? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just to make you feel good, the side panels of a lot of Trucks you see down the highway are bonded on with adhesive. There are some damn fine adhesives out there.

  13. Beer? by twofidyKidd · · Score: 1

    The United States Military, powered by PBR!

    --


    Hades, PoD: Official Advocate
    1. Re:Beer? by vboulytchev · · Score: 0

      That is so funny :) I say we treat cowboys, rednecks, and hicks just like we did blacks. just a suggestions :)

  14. What about Stirling Engines? by AK+Marc · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I thought http://www.stirlingenergy.com/ was a better solution

    1. Re:What about Stirling Engines? by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      Just one question -- how do they keep the mirrors clean?

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    2. Re:What about Stirling Engines? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A) They're not mirrors.
      B) I imagine they'd clean them the same way they'd clean solar cell surfaces.

    3. Re:What about Stirling Engines? by syphax · · Score: 1


      Depends on whether the light is diffuse or not. Concentrating solar sucks if the light is diffuse (due to clouds); PV fairs better.

      There are also issues of site requirements (middle of desert vs. on top of car, etc.), etc.

      Different solar technologies for different needs. They are all too expensive at present for wide-scale use; I really hope that changes.

      --
      Simple Unexpected Concrete Credible Emotional Stories
    4. Re:What about Stirling Engines? by evilviper · · Score: 1
      There are also issues of site requirements (middle of desert vs. on top of car, etc.), etc.

      I believe he was referring to the second link, which is a large PV cell site in Nevada (ie. "middle of desert").

      They are all too expensive at present for wide-scale use;

      No, actually they're not. If you read-up on the Sterling system, you'll find that it's going to provide cheaper electricity than other sources.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    5. Re:What about Stirling Engines? by syphax · · Score: 1


      Key phrase: it's going to provide cheaper electricity than other sources.

      I hope to hell it does, but it has not been demonstrated at present.

      Don't get me wrong, I am hugely pro-solar. But I also try to live in a reality-based community. Today, solar power is only commonly cost-effective in niche (e.g. off-grid) applications. I hope that changes.

      --
      Simple Unexpected Concrete Credible Emotional Stories
    6. Re:What about Stirling Engines? by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 3, Informative

      I spoke to one of the engineers a few years ago. They clean it exactly as you would expect: with some light detergent and a hose. No rubbing-- scraches the mirrors and requires more effort then a simple hosing down.

      In one test, they attached little sprayers (I think they were using the sprayers from a drip irrigation system) to the panels to spray it down every morning. Worked pretty well.

      --
      "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
    7. Re:What about Stirling Engines? by evilviper · · Score: 1
      Key phrase: it's going to provide cheaper electricity than other sources.

      No, they already have working models, just on a much smaller scale.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    8. Re:What about Stirling Engines? by Chagrin · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My main complaint with Sterling engine power generation is that it still relies on the same "buy your power from the power company" principle as it's only more economical than PV at large scales.

      Clean energy is one half of the equation; power independence is the other. If every house's roof could be occupied with a Sterling generation system as easily as a PV system I'd be all for it.

      --

      I/O Error G-17: Aborting Installation

    9. Re:What about Stirling Engines? by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

      They're cool but nobody's mass producing them at the moment, that makes them relatively expensive.

      --
      Deleted
    10. Re:What about Stirling Engines? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clean energy is one half of the equation; power independence is the other. If every house's roof could be occupied with a Sterling generation system as easily as a PV system I'd be all for it.

      I'd pay extra for that kind of independence, too. If I could keep my computers and my microwave oven running year-round, anyway...

  15. Facts don't see to match hype. by pdawson · · Score: 5, Informative

    Sadly, based on my understanding of the product described in the article, I don't see any way it can achieve any real MPG improvement. It only charges the small accessory 12V battery used for starting the car and running the power accessories(AC, steering, radio, etc). It provides no juice to the 28 200V main battery bank modules that power the engine.

    1. Re:Facts don't see to match hype. by evilviper · · Score: 1
      I don't see any way it can achieve any real MPG improvement. It only charges the small accessory 12V battery used for starting the car and running the power accessories

      It's called "conservation of energy". The energy in that 12V battery has to come from somewhere. If it comes from solar panels instead of from gasoline, you're using less gasoline. Period.

      I actually had the idea years ago to modify standard cars for electricity similarly to this... Lots of gasoline is wasted charging the battery, and in cold climates, de-icing the windows, and heating up the engine and passenger compartment. You'd have to modify the alternator so it would only keep the battery charged up to (eg.) 50%, as well, but it would save a several gallons.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    2. Re:Facts don't see to match hype. by pdawson · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It's called "conservation of energy". The energy in that 12V battery has to come from somewhere. If it comes from solar panels instead of from gasoline, you're using less gasoline. Period.


      Yes, but even if it eliminated the need to charge the single 12V battery at all, that does not account for 10% of the car's energy usage, 1-3% perhaps, as compared to the 28x 200V NiMh modules.
  16. Such restraint will happen automatically. by CyricZ · · Score: 2, Insightful

    But such curtailing will happen automatically. As oil becomes more scarce, the price will rise. And thus will rise the prices of products which require oil for their production. So the price of plastics will rise, for instance. People will begin to choose relatively cheaper alternatives. So your toothbrush will likely cost a dollar. But it may consist of a wooden handle, rather than a plastic one.

    --
    Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
  17. Make it a nice even $2500 by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    And include some extra Li-Ion battery capacity and a plug-in bridge rectifier so that it's solar-and-grid-and-gas, and this would be *really* interesting for a dealership add-on. I'm willing to bet you could push it to nearly 25% increase in efficiency.

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  18. It depends on your output by PIPBoy3000 · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you're looking to heat water, the focused mirrors on pipe approach works fairly well (or just paint something black and move pipe water through it). Essentially you're just using various tricks to store heat produced from sunlight in a fairly efficient manner.

    If you're looking at powering televisions and radios, though, you need to have electricity. Photovoltaics generally work best for that. Turning heated water into electricity does work, though at a lower efficiency.

    There's other issues, of course. Just because photovoltaics are more efficient doesn't make them cheaper. There's the long-term costs and how much investment you're willing to make in order to get your cost savings.

    1. Re:It depends on your output by rolfwind · · Score: 1
      If you're looking at powering televisions and radios, though, you need to have electricity. Photovoltaics generally work best for that. Turning heated water into electricity does work, though at a lower efficiency.


      That's not always true.

      For a farm, it's more efficient to use Parabolic mirrors and then at the focus point use either a stirling engine or a very heat resistent PV. Even if a PV is used, you need much less of it, saving a lot of money in the process.

      There are energy farms of both types in Austrailia and in the Southwestern US, I believ.

      http://stirlingenergy.com/
  19. Build a better battery by Kaikopere · · Score: 1

    Interesting point that alternative energy sources are only regionally effective. Maybe we should be focusing on the storage and transport of energy instead of collection. Then we just toss a few solar collection satellites in orbit where the weather can't affect their efficiency, and send it down in some manner more efficient than photons through an atmosphere.

    1. Re:Build a better battery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Interesting point that alternative energy sources are only regionally effective. Maybe we should be focusing on the storage and transport of energy instead of collection. Then we just toss a few solar collection satellites in orbit where the weather can't affect their efficiency, and send it down in some manner more efficient than photons through an atmosphere."

      exactly. i had that same idea once. like maybe you could have a satellite and then have some sort of battery/capacitor inside that charges up using the energy provided by the sun. and furthermore, it seems to me, although i could be completely wrong, that we could take advatage of higher energy light that is filtered out by our atmosphere and get close to 100% efficiency in terms of converting the power that hits the satellite into usable power.

      people will say, "oh, what about the energy that you need to get the satellite up there" or other cynical crap like that.

      although i am as pure an idiot as there is, i absolutely cannot stand when someone tries to do something to help the enviroment, like solar power, and then people come along and say "oh, well, it's only regionally effective" or "oh, people don't want it", or whatever.

      stuff like that is Bullshit with a capital B.

  20. All that power just for the military? by Durrill · · Score: 1

    Wow, those alien spaceships must need a lot of juice just to get them hovering off the ground.

    --
    If i wanted to hear bullshit, i'd go to church.
  21. Golf ball-sized hail? by wcrowe · · Score: 1

    ...and will provide clean energy for the US military.

    Until the first big hail storm, that is. (grin)

    But in all seriousness, how do such systems stand up to severe weather, particularly large hail?

    --
    Proverbs 21:19
    1. Re:Golf ball-sized hail? by Fishstick · · Score: 2, Informative

      Don't know about the cells being used on this particular car-top application, but in general modern solar cells are built to resist wind and hail damage.

      for example:
      http://www.gepower.com/prod_serv/products/solar/en /faqs/resid_sys.htm#faq23
      Can the modules withstand high winds and hail?

      The panels are supported by our roofer-designed mounting system that has been tested to withstand 125 mph (200 kph) winds and can work on almost every type of roofing material. Our modules can withstand one inch (2.5 cm) hailstones at 50 mph (80.5 kph).


      Of course, if your car is already doing 50 mph....

      --

      There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
      Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

    2. Re:Golf ball-sized hail? by Duhavid · · Score: 1

      Is that Moe HailStorm?

      Hail, hail, Hailstorm woohee!

      --
      emt 377 emt 4
    3. Re:Golf ball-sized hail? by Vorondil28 · · Score: 1

      >> ...and will provide clean energy for the US military
      >
      > ...how do such systems stand up to severe weather, particularly large hail?

      This got me thinking. If a solar panel is damaged and needs replacing, where does the old one go? I have a feeling the materials used in photovoltaic cells aren't biodegradeable. I guess it should read "will provide cleaner energy."

      --
      This sig rocks the casbah.
  22. But you're not getting the full picture. by CyricZ · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yes, a particular product today may require oil. But as the price of oil increases due to increased scarcity, manufacturers will instead switch to relatively cheaper non-oil alternatives. So often times you'll end up getting the same products, but they'll be made of a different, cheaper material.

    It's happened with coins, for instance. While certain coins one contained large amounts of copper, they now are made mostly of zinc with a thin coating of copper.

    Remember, plastic is only used so often today because it is so cheap. Once the price of plastic rises, people will switch to other materials which are relatively cheaper.

    I lived a good portion of my life before plastic became widespread. We used glass bottles instead of plastic bottles for many drinks, for instance. Somebody who grew up only using plastic might have a difficult time accepting the idea of not using plastic products. But it's more than possible, and was reality even just a few decades ago.

    --
    Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
    1. Re:But you're not getting the full picture. by isotope23 · · Score: 1

      It's happened with coins, for instance. While certain coins one contained large amounts of copper, they now are made mostly of zinc with a thin coating of copper.

      yes, but that is due to our government's inflationary policies. E.G. printing more money than they take in. It is in fact the inverse of increased scarcity.

      --
      Service guarantees Citizenship! Questions Guarantee GITMO.... Amerika Uber Alles!
    2. Re:But you're not getting the full picture. by CyricZ · · Score: 1

      Regardless of what caused the relative price of copper to increase relative to zinc, the fact remains that the relative price did increase. And as such, mints moved away from copper towards zinc. Some copper is still used, just as some oil would likely be used. But its use is far more constrained and limited.

      --
      Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
    3. Re:But you're not getting the full picture. by ChildeRoland · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure that it would still cost less than $0.01 to make a penny out of copper, but I could be wrong.

      --
      The mark of a mature person is not creating arbitrary criteria for considering others mature.
    4. Re:But you're not getting the full picture. by ChildeRoland · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I looked that up. Assuming $4,980 a ton (just barely under the recent record high of ~$5,050) and 3.1 grams per penny, it would cost about $0.015 per penny. But that still doesn't explain why our money is not worth the paper it's printed on.

      --
      The mark of a mature person is not creating arbitrary criteria for considering others mature.
    5. Re:But you're not getting the full picture. by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Yeah, they should use gold. Because it has intrinsic value, right?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    6. Re:But you're not getting the full picture. by Ced_Ex · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I lived a good portion of my life before plastic became widespread. We used glass bottles instead of plastic bottles for many drinks, for instance. Somebody who grew up only using plastic might have a difficult time accepting the idea of not using plastic products. But it's more than possible, and was reality even just a few decades ago.

      However, you may want to consider the energy required to produce/recycle glass? Heating of the sand to produce glass requires enormous amounts of heat, much of which is likely produced through burning of oil or gas.

      The steel caps used must be made from processed iron ore.

      Oil touches every aspect of your life, and if oil prices go up 3 times, so do the prices of everything else.

      --
      Live forever, or die trying.
    7. Re:But you're not getting the full picture. by isotope23 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, they should use gold. Because it has intrinsic value, right?

      Sarcasm I assume?

      Gold has intrinsic value for one reason only imo. Scarcity. True it does have value in electronics, jewelry etc. However the difference is that gold cannot be printed (e.g. created out of nothing), thus there is a stable amount, as opposed to fiat money.

      The value of a dollar has lost roughly 80% of its value since 1971 when nixon abrogated the breton woods agreement (left the gold standard). So yeah, I'd say having a gold backed currency is a good thing, in that it restrains government created inflation, or as it should be more properly called : a recurring tax upon savings.

      --
      Service guarantees Citizenship! Questions Guarantee GITMO.... Amerika Uber Alles!
    8. Re:But you're not getting the full picture. by Hognoxious · · Score: 1
      Duran Duran albums signed by all the band are rare. Does that mean they have intrinsic value?
      However the difference is that gold cannot be printed
      And fortunately you can't dig it out of the ground either. Er ... wait ...
      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    9. Re:But you're not getting the full picture. by isotope23 · · Score: 1

      However the difference is that gold cannot be printed
      And fortunately you can't dig it out of the ground either. Er ... wait ...

      Yeah, and which takes more effort, printing a sheet of bills with $100 on them,
      or digging up, and refining 100 oz of gold?

      There is NOTHING stopping fiat money from inflation. Indeed that is why the federal
      government can spend like a drunk on a binge. They create money out of nothing.
      At least with gold the money supply cannot grow easily, thus keeping a fairly stable value.

      Think about this, do you save money? If you do, it loses about 4% of its value every year through inflation. This means even after you pay your taxes any money you save has an additional 4% tax placed on it year after year.

      Go back and look at the value of a dollar throughout our history. A Dollar kept roughly the same purchasing power until we abrogated breton/woods (left the gold standard completely) it has since lost over 80% of its value.

      --
      Service guarantees Citizenship! Questions Guarantee GITMO.... Amerika Uber Alles!
  23. Solar power in Clark County. by von_blapp · · Score: 1

    This is a really good thing for the Vegas valley and the Military, who will also be a customer (Nellis, Indian Springs, Nevada Test Site). As a resident of the Vegas valley I can assure you that we need more projects like this. It would be nice if they could use these Solar farms to produce all the energy Sotuhern Nevada needs, but I dont see that happening any time soon.

    On more of ./'esque note, it would be nice to see a boost in jobs for engineers/IT because of this new plant, which needs trained technicians to keep it running.

    On a political note, you have that pinko Sen. Harry Reid touting it like he had some hand in getting this project done. Sorry you bastard, you had nothing to do with it. This will be a privately owned project, no government hand, which in my book is the best way anything can be done.

    Funny how all we have in office these days are communists and fascists...

    1. Re:Solar power in Clark County. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The local water company in LV is installing a 3.8MW solar power generation system at several of their sites around town. The first part of that project should go online soon. Maybe...

    2. Re:Solar power in Clark County. by theodicey · · Score: 1
      Do you really think this project would have been built if it weren't for the federal government signing up as a guaranteed customer?

      Obviously not, it's not saving the feds any money on their energy bills. They are, however, achieving other benefits (like you point out) investing in clean energy infrastructure and the skilled labor force needed to build and maintain it.

      Until these are in place and renewable energy costs have dropped (economies of scale), the short-sighted private companies you libertarians idolize aren't going to build anything similar anytime soon.

      I have no idea whether Reid is grandstanding, and neither do you. But it's quite possible that he brought home the Defense Dept. budget item allocating money towards renewable energy

    3. Re:Solar power in Clark County. by wasabifan · · Score: 1

      No, as another Vegas Valley resident, I do not think this is a good idea. Solar cells should be required on every new home built. We don't need to waste land and natural resources to put our solar cells out of sight. We need to be building everything with power conservation in mind, not a centralized power plant (out of eye site) so we can pretend power consumption doesn't matter.

  24. solar on top of car is pointless by Splork · · Score: 0, Redundant

    it can not generate enough power during a sunny day to charge the large batteries in any hybrid a useful amount. sure it might charge your cell phone or electric razor but try powering your car off one of those.

    do the math.

    1. Re:solar on top of car is pointless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone else just did, and apparently they proved you wrong.

    2. Re:solar on top of car is pointless by onkelonkel · · Score: 1

      OK - lets do the math.

      Can't RTFA due to slashdotting, but lets assume (generously). A 75 Watt panel is about 2' x 4'. Say we paste 2 on our car. Energy output over 8 hrs is 75W x 60 sec x 60 min x 8 hr x 2 panels = 4.3 MJ (mega Joule). Gasoline energy content = 45 MJ per gallon. OK we have saved 1/10 gallon of gas.

      Wait...car engine only delivers about 25% of fuel energy as useful work. On the other hand we loose a bit of energy storing and then retrieving from battery but probably not more than 10%. So net net we gain about 1/3 gallon of gasoline equivalent in 8 hrs.

      Not much gain really. Better to roof parking area with solar panels and everybody plugs in. Panels aren't lost if you wreck your car, plus you get to park in the shade.

      * numbers pulled from wikipedia or butt as required

      --
      None of them can see the clouds; The polished wings don't care.
    3. Re:solar on top of car is pointless by adamdeprince · · Score: 1

      Not true at all. The difference between full and empty isn't that much ... IIRC the (original) Civic and Prius are 100 watt/hr and 300 watt/hr respectively. The battery isn't big because it has to hold a lot of power, it is big to reduce the cycle depth.

      Say 10 hours parked outside and a short commute, yeah, even a modest cell would help a lot. Now if you park in a garage and have a long commute, then the extra weight is going to outweigh any benefit

      As for any benefit while sitting in traffic, well, not much, the power output of the cell is likely less than your cars "hotel load." While actually driving the weight of the cell will increase your marginal fuel use more than any power benefit it offers.

      Basically, the question you have to ask is: Does the cell over the course of the day provide more power than it takes to carry it around.

      For a short commute, and a light weight cell, the answer is probally yes, but you might not want to bother taking it on a cross country trip

    4. Re:solar on top of car is pointless by Squirmy+McPhee · · Score: 1
      So net net we gain about 1/3 gallon of gasoline equivalent in 8 hrs. Not much gain really.

      Really? Consider an average workday. You drive to work, park your car for 8 hours, and drive home. Your hybrid gets 60 mpg and let's say you live 10 miles from work. That's 20 miles round-trip, consuming about 1/3 gallon of gas. But your solar panel has given you 1/3 gallon of gasoline equivalent, so you get to work using (essentially) no gasoline at all. How is that not much gain?

      A solar panel on top of a hybrid is really just a special case of the plug-in hybrid, which is touted by many as having great promise for exactly this reason. It won't help heavy drivers, but it should be great for commuters.

  25. Quite well, apparently. by CyricZ · · Score: 1

    A typical car windshield can stop golfball-sized hail without much difficulty. It is quite possible that similar glass could be used to protect solar panels.

    --
    Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
  26. Good Looking Hybrids by nroose · · Score: 2, Interesting
  27. Well, Erm... by Quaoar · · Score: 1

    Don't build them above the trees?

    It's not like the places where solar panels would be placed are particularly nature-friendly anyway (rooftops). No one is saying bulldoze the rainforests and put solar panels there.

    --
    I'll form my OWN solar system! With blackjack! And hookers!
  28. Re:Solar Energy != Free Energy by FinestLittleSpace · · Score: 1

    Stick black tiles on the roof of a house, and they absorb a massive amount of solar energy and don't do much with it except convert it to heat, which gets radiated and helps the greenhouse effect, which I think we're helping quite enough anyway. Stick solar cells on that roof instead and they absorb the energy and use it to heat a house's water supply, which would other wise have to be done by other fuels.

  29. Not sure, site is tanked by raygundan · · Score: 1

    I did see a similar product recently from a link from a different site (not sure if this is the same one, since we've killed their server)-- and it worked by charging a *separate* 12v battery system. The problem was that they didn't want to screw with directly charging the hybrid battery since the controls were not designed to do that while the car was off. So they add another battery to store up the solar energy, which then dumps into the big battery (presumably through some sort of voltage conversion) when the car is running.

    Not a terrible idea, but not great either. I think you'd be better off sticking the same number of panels on your roof, and selling the power to the grid. Same power saved, less hassle, fewer unnecessary lead-acid batteries, less weight on the car. The right way to charge the hybrid would require the hybrid to be designed for "plug-in" charging from the get-go.

  30. Re:Solar Energy != Free Energy by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

    we would likely see some disturbing side effects of using this energy.

    Nah. It all ends up as heat anyway. Thermodynamics 101.

  31. On a Plug-in maybe by vapid+transit · · Score: 1

    Others have said it before me but this would seemingly be worth it on a plug-in hybrid to charge the supplemental battery.

  32. In Pacific NW, Solar is very useful by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Here, we get about 70-80 percent of the electricity from a solar cell on a grey and cloudy day - yeah, it rains a lot here - but many people have hybrid cars. Way more than most other places.

    So, while the hybrid car is sitting in the carpool lot, a rooftop solar panel can charge up the battery - or maybe carpool lots could provide these as plug-ins - while your car is washed clean by the soothing misty rains that drive you insane. Saves on gas cost - especially with the new plug-or-pump electric hybrids that let you plug in if you want to or just use gasoline/biodiesel.

    Or you can use cheap hydro or wind power (3/4 of our energy supply) to plug in and do the same thing.

    It's not like your car was doing anything - it might as well charge up while it's taking up valuable real estate.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  33. Go VW! by RingDev · · Score: 2, Informative

    Side note, we get less then 20% of our oil from the middle east, if they drop out completely we would just push harder on Venezuala.

    On the other hand, if you buy a brand new VW Gold tdi (turbo diesel) for about the same cost (nicely loaded just under $22k) you get 45mpg (realistic estimate, not inflated EPA). So your fuel costs are similar to the of the Pirus but you have a car with significantly more power and pep. You also have a vehicle that can be feed 100% biodiesel and run with out a drop of petrol. And given the ruggedness of Diesel engines and the VW quality, you have a car that will continue to get 45mpg for 200,000. Compared to the Prius which is going to need new batteries every 3-5 years.

    -Rick

    --
    "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
    1. Re:Go VW! by buraianto · · Score: 1

      1. VW quality? Hmmm. 2. The Prius' batteries last longer than 3-5 years.

    2. Re:Go VW! by syphax · · Score: 1

      ruggedness of Diesel engines
      Good.

      and the VW quality
      I happen to know a thing or two about VW's warranty numbers. Not good.

      Diesel's one weakness is (non-CO2) emissions. They have become a lot cleaner over the years, esp. in Europe where the fuel is better (that is changing in the US), but they still, if memory serves, have higher particulate, NOx, and hydrocarbon emissions than gas engines. That said, I wouldn't mind owning a biodiesel-powered Jetta.

      --
      Simple Unexpected Concrete Credible Emotional Stories
    3. Re:Go VW! by RingDev · · Score: 1

      "but they still, if memory serves, have higher particulate, NOx, and hydrocarbon emissions than gas engines. That said, I wouldn't mind owning a biodiesel-powered Jetta."

      Similar/Lower NOx and hydrocarbon per gallon. Lower particulate per mile. If you look at the exhaust from a 30mpg gas car over 100,000 miles compared to a 45mpg turbo diesel over 100,000 miles, the diesel will be lower across the board. Going biodiesel drops it even more as you are completely removing sulfur from the equation.

      -Rick

      --
      "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
    4. Re:Go VW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is very unfortunate for the USA that PSA group cars (Peugeot and Citroen) are not sold there. Their common rail diesel engines, known by the HDi branding, are an order of magnitude more refined than the VAG group (VW, SEAT, AUDI, Skoda) offerings. Luckily for you, Ford is using the HDi engine in the Focus, so maybe you'll get to try one.

    5. Re:Go VW! by syphax · · Score: 1

      Similar/Lower NOx and hydrocarbon per gallon. Lower particulate per mile

      Really? Lower particulates seems hard to believe. I remember having this conversation with a diesel expert at MIT ~ 10 years ago. A lot has changed and/or my memory sucks...

      --
      Simple Unexpected Concrete Credible Emotional Stories
    6. Re:Go VW! by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      Compared to the Prius which is going to need new batteries every 3-5 years.

      "Aw jeez, not this shit again."

      As far as I'm aware, Toyota has yet to replace the battery in a North American Prius due to normal wear and tear, and they've been on the roads for over 5 years now. Furthermore, the battery is warrantied for 8 years or 100,000 miles, so even if for some reason it does fail after 3 years, you're not paying $3000 to get it replaced.

      And while discussing diesel cars, you may want to touch on how dirty their exhaust is. You can't even buy a diesel passenger car in some states, as they don't meet emissions standards.

    7. Re:Go VW! by RingDev · · Score: 3, Informative

      "Significantly, particulate emissions have been reduced by over 90 percent in the past 15 years." - http://www.greencar.com/index.cfm?content=features 13

      "The TDI is certified to the tough minimum Tier 1 requirement - this is the stringent California standard for what is permitted from a car's tailpipe. The TDI could have been certified to even stricter requirements if not for NOX and particulate emissions, which are naturally higher in diesel engines because of their exceptional combustion efficiencies.

      Volkswagen is confident these NOX levels can be lowered using new technology if the sulfur level in our nation's diesel fuel was reduced. For this very reason, Volkswagen and the other members of the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers have advocated lower federal sulfur content standards in both diesel and gasoline fuels." - http://tedshelton.blogspot.com/2005/11/good-custom er-service-from-vw.html

      There's plenty more out on the web. the TDI with current US petrol diesel will have a higher particulate rate per gallon spent, but a lower rate per mile due to their improved efficiency.

      -Rick

      --
      "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
    8. Re:Go VW! by Qwavel · · Score: 1

      Making up 20% of your gasoline requirements would be extremely difficult. Prices would be through the roof.

      Not that I agree with the idea of anticipating a war in the middle east when making car purchase decisions.

      Also, I have found deisel engines to be too noisy, whereas the prius I once drove in was quite quiet.

    9. Re:Go VW! by syphax · · Score: 2

      From the article:

      However, those who follow the latest advances in clean diesel technology know that diesel's future is cleaner, and better. Still, impressions of old are difficult to overcome.

      Apparently so. Thanks for the scoop.

      --
      Simple Unexpected Concrete Credible Emotional Stories
    10. Re:Go VW! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      And while discussing diesel cars, you may want to touch on how dirty their exhaust is. You can't even buy a diesel passenger car in some states, as they don't meet emissions standards.

      California is one of them. Diesel passenger cars will be on sale here again in 2008 or so, when California has mandated low-sulfur diesel.

      And of course, if you're running biodiesel, the emissions are much lower, and if you run vegetable oil, granted it has only about 87% of the energy of [bio]diesel, but the emissions are better than all but the [S]ULEV gasoline vehicles - and if you run biofuel, then the CO2 emissions are effectively 100% better (since biofuels do not affect the carbon balance.)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    11. Re:Go VW! by RingDev · · Score: 2, Informative

      My bust. I was incorrect, prius batteries are better protected then I had been originally told.

      As for diesel exhaust, check for yourself, modern diesels (VW TDI) are 50 state legal, including California's Tier 1. And running biodiesel drops the emissions even more. In any case emissions per mile are lower across the board then gasoline engines.

      -Rick

      --
      "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
    12. Re:Go VW! by Smidge204 · · Score: 1

      Volkswagen is confident these NOX levels can be lowered using new technology if the sulfur level in our nation's diesel fuel was reduced.

      Luckily, both biodiesel and TDP created diesel both have zero sulfur content. And both are carbon-neutral (or even decrease atmospheric carbon) and fully renewable.

      It's very hard not to jump on the "Big oil conspiracy" bandwagon, but so far neither of these seems to be cost effective enough to gain a major market share. Shame, really...
      =Smidge=

    13. Re:Go VW! by RingDev · · Score: 1

      I don't know about the cost effectivity. There is a 20m gal/year biodiesel plant being built just outside of Madison, WI.

      -Rick

      --
      "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
    14. Re:Go VW! by Smidge204 · · Score: 1

      I made so many grammatical errors in that last post, I can hardly believe I wrote it... *facepalms*

      =Smidge=

    15. Re:Go VW! by WarpedMind · · Score: 1

      While we may only consume 20% of our oil from the Middle East, on the whole world market, I think the Middle East contributes a greater percentage. The reason this is important is that we bid on oil on the open market. Even domestically produced oil is subject to the same market pricing. If the rest of the world market was suddenly short of the Middle East oil, then the price would shoot up beyond belief. (A recent estimate was if the House of Saud fell, the cost would go over $230/barrel.) Put another way, everyone would lean on Venezuala.

    16. Re:Go VW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "VW quality"

      Oxymoron

    17. Re:Go VW! by Software · · Score: 1
      So much FUD for one post -- I'm impressed. First, though we get only a small amount of our oil from the Middle East, oil is a global market. When a big supplier has a problem, the price rises everywhere, quickly. Doesn't anyone remember Econ 101 and that the example of an inelastic (in the short run) commodity was oil? How about those of us on the East Coast, way away from Hurricane Katrina, that saw our gas prices rise overnight, even though none of our refining was done in New Orleans?

      Second, Prius batteries last more than 3-5 years. They're warranteed for 8 years or 80,000 miles. I agree that they will probably not last as long as a VW diesel. I get between 40 and 45 mpg in my Prius in city driving.

      Third, while the VW can run on biodiesel, I don't think there's a decent supply for this fuel yet, so whether the car can run on it is irrelevant. The biodiesel that exists is not fossil-fuel free, either, since the food that it's grown with uses fossil-fuel derived fertilizer.

    18. Re:Go VW! by kesuki · · Score: 1

      biofuels are viable, right now today, $2 a gallon is plenty for existing soybean farmers etc to 'profit'. with the right investment in technology we could make 'cheaper' biofuels, through the theoretically 'cheaper' to produce algea. i mean it has 50x the energy yield of soybean plants, which we've found to be profitable at $2 a gallon for refined biodiesel... even if that 50x yeild only netted a 5x reduced production cost, well 40 cents a gallon? when was the last time Petrolium was that cheap?

      scary stuff for the oil industry, of course until someone tries to produce as much algea, for the minimal cost possible and calculates the actual cost of doing so it's just 'theory'

      Bill gates could with 1% of his personal fortune establish an algea to biodiesel operation capable of producing 50% of the volume that the US consumes every year, in the best case scenario. $500 million would go a long way to building a biofuel industry capable of crushing the oil/coal/gas cartel, just imagine what a few bn would do.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_power solar cells are about 15% efficient, algea is about 50% efficient, and soybeans are about 1% efficient. vehicles running off straight algea or algea oil would be running at more than triple the efficiency of solar electric vehicles. which means you could have three times as many of them on the road, for the available surface area that could be dedicated to production of solar energy.

      add in the savings of not having to 'manufacture' the solar cells, and the energy becomes quite cheap. possibly cheaper than fission power, possibly cheaper than fusion.

    19. Re:Go VW! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      biofuels are viable, right now today, $2 a gallon is plenty for existing soybean farmers etc to 'profit'. with the right investment in technology we could make 'cheaper' biofuels, through the theoretically 'cheaper' to produce algea.

      No. Soy is unacceptable, as is any expansion of traditional, dirt-based farming. If it's not hydro then it's doing irreparable damage to the topsoil. Take a look at Egypt sometime, it used to be mostly green. Then came agriculture. Look at the midwest sometime... the majority of the topsoil is GONE. You take out the native trees and grasses and the wind just rips that shit up and carries it off, eventually to some water someplace, eventually to the ocean, eventually to kill off yet more ocean life.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    20. Re:Go VW! by RingDev · · Score: 1

      "I'm impressed. First, though we get only a small amount of our oil from the Middle East, oil is a global market."

      True, I was not saying that if the entire Middle East stoped producing oil, I was saying that if the US stoped buying ME oil. For instance, if we attack Iran, Saudi Arabia may just give us the bird and tell us to go hump a tree. Now, SA is still producing oil, just not for the US. The extra oil they have would be distributed, thus lightening the demand on Central America's exports slightly. Then, the US would lean more on CA for it's oil.

      "Second, Prius batteries last more than 3-5 years."

      Granted, another poster pointed that out already, I appologized for my inaccurate statement, and now know better.

      "Third, while the VW can run on biodiesel, I don't think there's a decent supply for this fuel yet"

      As mentioned in another post. Biodiesel plants are being built. There is a 20m gallon/year plant being built just out side of Madison, WI right now.

      "The biodiesel that exists is not fossil-fuel free, either, since the food that it's grown with uses fossil-fuel derived fertilizer."

      Soy (the current primary bio-diesel crop) is pretty light on the fertilizer, and the big advantage is that it doesn't need nitrogen (ie: petrol based fertilizers) unlike corn (used for ethanol) which needs large amounts of petrol based fertilizers. There are also new technologies going into carbon scruber algee. Acres of these plants can be grown arround coal based power plants to clean emissions from the air. Not only do they help clean the air, but they can be processed into biodiesel, and the remains can be further processed into ethanol. So yes, right now there is not enough bio-diesel to fuel every single vehicle in the world. But the production is growing rapidly.

      -Rick

      --
      "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
    21. Re:Go VW! by kesuki · · Score: 1

      having lived in the midwest all my life i can say that the majority of the topsoil is in fact still here. but yeah, wind erosion dose cause a signifigant problem for agraculture. keep in mind if you'd read my entire comment you'd have noticed my mentioning of algea, which i prefer to soy based... on the arguments that it can be produced vastly cheaper, with the right technological investments.

      Egypt hasn't been 'green' since iraq was a garden of tropical wonder. all this 'erosion' you speak of occured long before modern agroculture, and infact modern 'agroculture' has reclaimed vast tracts of 'unusable land' through fertilization and crop rotations.

      but yeah, i have seen land that has been 'turned to sand' through irresponsible crop managment, mostly from agressive soil destroying crops such as ginsing, or tobbacco. other crops like peanuts, which can also be used for diesel fuel production restore a natural balance to the soil. so even with land based biofuels it's possible to help 'repair' the soil balance.

    22. Re:Go VW! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      having lived in the midwest all my life i can say that the majority of the topsoil is in fact still here.

      No, the majority of the dirt is still there, but the majority of the topsoil is gone. The topsoil is the finest part of the soil, being made up of about 60% biological material and only maybe 40% mineral. And once it's gone, it takes decades to rebuild.

      Egypt hasn't been 'green' since iraq was a garden of tropical wonder. all this 'erosion' you speak of occured long before modern agroculture, and infact modern 'agroculture' has reclaimed vast tracts of 'unusable land' through fertilization and crop rotations.

      It doesn't require modern agriculture, which only accelerates the process. All it takes is irrigation. And crop rotation is a big help but it doesn't change the fact that you're uncovering the soil and discing it up, which gives it a chance to blow or wash away.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    23. Re:Go VW! by HaggiZ · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Back to the source of the oil. Iran is the second largest OPEC nation, an organisation which controls almost 40% of global oil production. Even by your own figures, I think a sudden loss of one fifth of your oil supply would have a drastic affect on the price of oil. Don't forget the US is not the only country burning oil at a terrible rate, many other countries are going to be bidding for that Venezualan oil if/when the middle east decide they don't want to deliver to anyone in the "coalition of the willing".

      The slightest hiccup in oil production over the past 12 months (hurricanes, strikes, fires, threats of civil unrest, military coups, etc.) have regularly resulted in +10% movements in price. I can only imagine what would happen to prices if 20% of production just suddenly turned off, and really turned off not just speculation on what might occur.

    24. Re:Go VW! by SaDan · · Score: 1

      Growing up on a farm in the midwest, I think I can safely say the topsoil is still here, and not going away anytime soon (with the exception of areas that get flooded, that's fairly devastating to farmland).

      Something today's farmers have that no one else has had is modern soil conservation programs. No-till farming is big, because not only does it do a very good job of protecting the land from erosion (wind or water), you also perform less passes over the same plot of land during planting season, tend to move quicker due to the firm ground (less slippage for tires), so you save a lot of fuel in the process.

      To add to all of that, you can now do GPS plots with soil samples, and spread the perfect amount of fertilizer over the ground, which reduces nitrate runoff quite a bit (almost entirely, with proper application).

      Farming is a tough business these days. Less than 2% of the population in the USA are farmers, farmland is shrinking faster than ever due to urban development and farmers going under due to costs. If you, as a farmer, do not plan accordingly, use the technology that's available, and conserve as much as possible, you will fail as a farmer.

      Modern farmers aren't stupid, and they aren't destroying the earth. Most of the farmers I know are VERY supportive of bio-fuels and recycling, because they know in the end they're not only helping the environment, but they're helping themselves too.

    25. Re:Go VW! by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 1

      Side note, we get less then 20% of our oil from the middle east, if they drop out completely we would just push harder on Venezuala.

      The US is having trouble with that Communist dictatorship as well.

    26. Re:Go VW! by RingDev · · Score: 1

      I phrased my post poorly. What I ment was that if the middle east were to stop providing us with oil, we would be okay. They would still be selling oil, just not to us. But that would free up resources from other countries (Russia/Central America).

      The largest effect on our gas prices is not the barrel. Look at the change in crude costs over the last two years, gas prices should have doubled if crude was to blame. No, the problem lies in the refinement industry. The US regulary runs at 90%+ capacity (I can't recall exact numbers) We have ~ 120 refineries. Which means if you have a handful of refineries down for maintenance, and another refiner drops (due to strike/fire/huricanes/etc) you are not going to be able to produce enough gas to meet demand. After Katrina hit gas prices skyrocketed, not because of the middle east, hell they were sending us extra crude (If I recall correctly, someone even offered to ship refined gasoline across the Atlantic). The problem was that we had a large number of our refineries in the area. Many of those refineries were either damanged or with out electricity. Sure, there may have been a slight surge in gas costs anyways due to the disruption of flow in the gulf, but more refineries further inland would have saved us a lot of costs.

      That being said, necesity is the mother of invention. And $3/gallon is one hell of a motivator. Once you get past that $3/gallon gasoline line, building the hydrogen infrastructure starts looking like an economicly sound idea. At $2.39 (local cheap gas here) it is still the cheapest short term.

      Although I recently did the math on my and my wife's driving habbits. Replacing my daily commute (built 3.4l Fiero ~20mpg) and her evening driving (87 dodge Raider ~12mpg) with a new Golf TDI (45mpg diesel) will save us about $100/month in fuel costs, even with the higher price of diesel. Not only would it save us money in the long run, it has the ability to run on non-petrol fuels, and produces less emissions.

      -Rick

      --
      "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
    27. Re:Go VW! by RingDev · · Score: 1

      So true. But we only have 2 more years of Bush. Hopefully we can go that long with out pissing off any more economicly critical allies.

      -Rick

      --
      "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
    28. Re:Go VW! by Eivind · · Score: 1

      heh. Just goes to show how different various climates are. Where I grew up there was like literally a meter of topsoil. (i.e. soil consisting of 90%+ biological matter.

  34. Re:Solar Energy != Free Energy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does anyone know, or have a link to the current state that PhotoVoltaics is in?? Are we still at the 15% effeicency or whatever?? I recall a few claims within the last year of somewhere around 60%, but alas, the whereabouts escape me.

    Anyone know or working on this particular area of technology??

  35. Slashdotted! by Frazbin · · Score: 5, Funny

    Looks like a CLOUD passed over their SERVER FARM!

    Ha! Ha ha! Ha! Ha, ha ha! Ha ha, ha, ha!

    Ah, renewable energy! Endless mirth!

  36. Re:Solar Energy != Free Energy by vertinox · · Score: 1

    I know there is a crapload of solar energy bombarding our planet every day, but isn't there some point where the amount of solar energy that we intercept for our own use causes problems with our environment.

    If I remember this right, 75% of the light that hits the earth is reflected. I could be horribly wrong about this figure and it might only be 25%, but I believe the issue is that most of the light that is reflected is by the Ice caps since white reflects all colors verus the oceans reflecting only blue and forests only green.

    I think we face more of a risk of absorbing too much light from lack of ice caps than building too many solar arrays.

    Heck these solar arrays might actually reduce global warming since they are converting it to electricty instead of all just heat (yeah... there is plenty of heat still generated, but not as much).

    --
    "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
    -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
  37. Re:Solar is big.. but it's really really big by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    . remember the alternative sun being created by (or attempted by) the Chinese? But, solar and wind energy (unlike say Hydrogen) are so region specific, that they impose problems for wide-spread acceptability. And there arent any means found to store them successfully.

    Sure there is, gravity-pumped water storage. During sunny or windy periods, any unused draw is used to pump up water to a higher elevation, which can then be used for water usage (got to get the water in those towers somehow) or for power generation (how do you think hydroelectric dams work). Many nations like India and Denmark use this to store wind energy - they pump up the water and then use it.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  38. Re:Solar Energy != Free Energy by syphax · · Score: 1

    Let's see... incoming solar radiation either gets re-radiated back out to space, or ends up as heat energy somewhere. Incoming solar radiation that hits a solar panel gets reflected a little, goes to heat a lot, and generates a little electricity. Which eventually ends up as... heat.

    The main impact of large-scale solar is how much you affect the planet's albedo (tendency to reflect the energy back into space). If you put your solar installations over surfaces with similar albedo (say, parking lots- they are both pretty black), you're good. Much less impact than, say, melting high-albedo ice caps.

    I've forgotten the details, but I believe that the potential temperature forcing due to the albedo change of large-scale solar power is much, much smaller than the forcing of, say, doubling atmospheric CO2 (which at current trends we should easily reach in less than 100 years).

    --
    Simple Unexpected Concrete Credible Emotional Stories
  39. Considering Davos was predicting $80+ oil by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    This should help a lot.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  40. Not uniformly distributed benefits by goombah99 · · Score: 1

    This sun charger will benefit people with short commutes much more than 10%. maybe as much as 100%. Whereas it will hardly benefit at all anyone with a long commute. Yet it's precisely the latter folks that benefit the most from pruis ownership. Moreover city drivers probably don't park their prius on the street, but rather in a sunless parking garage. So this will not affect urban pollution.

    One the upside this probably works best during summer when gas prices are peaked.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
  41. Slashdotted! Link to cached copy by jonathankpa · · Score: 2, Informative

    Got this message on trying to view the article:

    "Hi folks, sorry for this message. Slashdot has just picked up a story (that we ran two months ago!) and the resulting traffic has driven our server to it's knees. We'll be back on line when things settle out, so please stand by.
    We're experiencing technical difficulties, please bear with us while we work to resolve them.
    Please bookmark RenewableEnergyAccess.com for future reference.
    Thank you for your patience."

    Therefore, here's a cached copy from Google:
    http://tinyurl.com/7amp7

    --
    I Thess. 5:16-18. "Elephants are the only mammal not known to jump."
  42. Re:Solar Energy != Free Energy by CentraSpike · · Score: 1

    hmm, i had a similar thought about wind turbines potentially messing with weather patterns and wave/tidal energy technology messing with sea currents. But to be honest i thought i might be getting slightly paranoid - particularly when i started thinking that nuclear reactions might be messing with the finely balanced fabric of space/time and accelerating the collapse of the universe.

  43. Actually efficiency is the same. by skids · · Score: 1


    Solar thermal like the Stirling Energy Systems dishes just turned up, or the Solar trough technology, or thermoharmonic generators, achieves 30%+ efficiency and has been running neck-and-neck with photovotaics. Until PV utilizes more of the solar radiation bandwidth, I expect that both technologies will be used.

  44. What about manufacturing? by jcr · · Score: 1

    The only consolation is the concept of helping mother nature.

    I wonder if this product breaks even, energy-wise, when you account for the energy needed to manufacture it?

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    1. Re:What about manufacturing? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      The thin solar panels are pretty cheap to make, so I'd guess yes. You see them all over the place for practically nothing. I'm thinking about getting a hand-launch radio-controlled glider and putting a panel on the top and bottom of each wing, along with a minimal power supply, so I don't need to put a battery in it. (You need 5-6V to run the receiver, and charging four cells of NiMH is spendy to do well.)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  45. Just good sense by Brunellus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Any system that simplifies or minimizes the logistical load on any military installation or deployment is good for the military. For them, the issue isn't so much the absolute cost, but the availability of electric power when they might need it. Might not have been trivial in an age where field telephones could be energized by hand cranks...but considering the amount of information technology that goes to war with a post-modern army, it's not a bad thing for the guys in uniform to be investigating. If photovoltaics mean that installations in the field will not need as many gallons of diesel fuel to run generators, that diesel can be put to better use ferrying other needed supplies, or evacuating casualties.

  46. Re:Solar Energy != Free Energy by lucifig · · Score: 1

    Yeah, enough of this solar crap! We are using up the sun!

  47. Dialectic power! by Brunellus · · Score: 1
    Funny how all we have in office these days are communists and fascists...

    The dialectic gets you coming and going, comrade.

  48. Economics misunderstood as usual. by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 1

    Yes, Cyric, but people don't understand economics; they understand finance and call it economics. That's like strapping downhill skis on a cross-country skier and expecting him to make it to the bottom of a black diamond trail in one piece. Finance and economics are both about money, right? Skiing is skiing, right? WRONGO, JACK!
    -russ

    --
    Don't piss off The Angry Economist
  49. If this is the product I think it is... by skids · · Score: 1

    (can't tell due to slashdotting) ...I don't believe the 10% claim. All they are doing is charging the tiny 12V system which only draws 200W, not the main batteries. Now if they printed a CIGS panel on the entire area of the roof/trunk/hood, they might be able to charge the main batteries like the Lapp Prius and actually get real results. Other than the flexible stick-on panels being very nice, they aren't ready for prime time yet if all they can deliver covering half the roof is 60W.

    So A funny thing happened today, BTW -- I went to renewableenergyaccess like I usually do, and they were "experiencing technical difficulties." So I figured -- this is unusual, I've never seen them have problems before. Then I came here, and voila! Source of problem found! :-)

    (Folks interested in energy stuff are welcome at my dkos diary BTW -- skids.dialykos.com)

  50. 36000 homes, or 2 casinos... by alien236 · · Score: 1

    PBR and SunEdison will develop a total of 36 MWs of PV projects in Nevada, enough energy to power 36,000 homes.

    Or two casinos for 6 months! Come on, who are they kidding. Vegas is in Clark County. This power is going right to them!

    --
    I reject your reality and substitute my own.
    1. Re:36000 homes, or 2 casinos... by ChrisGilliard · · Score: 1

      Or two casinos for 6 months! Come on, who are they kidding. Vegas is in Clark County. This power is going right to them!

      Yeah, interesting point. Powering a city that never sleeps will take a little bit more than your average city.

      --
      No Sigs!
  51. Hydrogen Farming by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I think it would make more sense to put solar cells out in the desert (there's lots of square miles of desert) near water and existing natural gas pipelines. Use the sunlight to make hydrogen, oxygen, and heavy water. Ship the hydrogen through the natural gas system (yes you can do this) as a substitute for natural gas. Take the oxygen away in tanker trucks for industrial use, and sell the heavy water to the government. There is no pollution, demand peaks, or major changes necessary to make use of this resource.

    Then pay me my commission on this idea that I never hear talked about otherwise in any serious manner.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
    1. Re:Hydrogen Farming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      um... pure hydrogen is much more corrosive than natural gas. the current pipelines we have for gas are incapable of carrying hydrogen.

    2. Re:Hydrogen Farming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great idea. Except for one thing. Where are you gonna find water in the desert? And if you do and use it all up for hydrogen production, what is going to be left to wash my car?

    3. Re:Hydrogen Farming by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1
      Where are you gonna find water in the desert?

      Some deserts sit in huge aquifers. They're only dry on top. And consider a river like the Colorado River that is this streak of beautiful blue through an otherwise desert. Getting the necessary feed water is hardly what's stopping this idea.

      --
      "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  52. Slashdotted...thanks by solarstoops · · Score: 1

    Well, thank you ScuttleMonkey, just wish you'd linked to one of our more recent stories. Yes folks, we'll be off-line until you all find something better to do. Cheers!

  53. Re:Go VW! Diesel is more! by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1
    So your fuel costs are similar to the of the Pirus

    Don't know about where you live but in my state diesel costs on average 30 cents/gallon more than 87 octane.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  54. Re:Solar Energy != Free Energy by pclminion · · Score: 2, Informative
    But there is also the issue of solar energy heating our atmosphere and the ground.

    Unless you're storing vast amounts of energy in the largest batteries known to mankind, any energy captured by solar cells is going to quickly turn back into heat again anyway. May I remind you that that is exactly what would have happened had we not captured that energy in the first place.

    Now, if you covered a large portion of the planet with solar cells, and used that power to run a giant laser which blasted that energy off into space, never to return, then you might run into some problems. But we don't use energy like that.

  55. Sad. by StarKruzr · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one who thinks the Prius looks futuristic and cool?

    --

    +++ATH0
    1. Re:Sad. by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "Am I the only one who thinks the Prius looks futuristic and cool?"

      Yes.

      But, I will admit, I'm a bit extreme...I hope I never have to drive a 'family' car...I've only owned one car that had more than 2 seats in it in my life...and that was a Porsche.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    2. Re:Sad. by databyss · · Score: 1

      The hybrid car market isn't for you yet.

      Thanks for stopping by, hope you enjoyed your visit.

      --
      Hmmm witty sig or funny sig? Maybe elitest techy sig!
    3. Re:Sad. by smenor · · Score: 1

      You're not alone - I really like the way they look as well (both inside and out). The push button start and in the dash shifter are pretty cool as well.

      Oddly, I really don't like the way the Matrix looks even though, objectively, I think it shares a lot of external geometry with the Prius.

    4. Re:Sad. by NeMon'ess · · Score: 1

      I like them fine as well

  56. Re:Solar Energy != Free Energy by mikael · · Score: 2, Informative

    Read up on the "urban heat sink effect" of large cities. For every 1 mile radius of city, the core temperature rises up by 1 degree centigrade. So the core temperature for a large city can actually be 10 degrees higher than in the suburbs. And urban development causes rainwater to run off 10 times faster than if it were being soaked up by natural vegetation. This has the effect of disrupting local weather patterns to the extent that a city can actually created a rainfall shadow; an area downwind of the central core which has an artificially higher rainfall (which might not be too bad unless it's acid rain). NASA have more details.

    The effect of solar panels is negligible compared to what we have already done.

    --
    Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
  57. US to power military by solar by intnsred · · Score: 1, Troll

    I was intrigued by the last part of the summary -- that the world's largest solar project (almost twice the size of the existing largest) will power not US houses, not US hospitals, not US industry, but instead will power the US war machine (an organization which has a publicly stated goal of world military domination).

    Seems a fitting snapshot of the US's continuing economic decline.

    1. Re:US to power military by solar by kadathseeker · · Score: 1

      US's continuing economic decline? I wasn't aware of that - I thought that 3% growth and 5% unemployment were optimal economic growth condidtions. Maybe reporters should take an economics class, no? Hell, a journalism class might do them some good too. Americans work longer and sleep much less than almost all other nations, and most people are happy with a annual three-week vacation. No bash against France in particular, but as an example of a more socialised country, they get 11 weeks of vacation on average, and (okay maybe this is only France) go on strike as soon as they get back.

      --
      The 'Net is a waste of time, and that's exactly what's right about it. - William Gibson
    2. Re:US to power military by solar by intnsred · · Score: 1

      US's continuing economic decline?

      The US is living on its seed corn. Under Bush a change was made so that the US gov't no longer reports the metrics to calculate how many decreasing-value dollars they're printing, and we are literally exporting wealth. (Isn't another front-page /. article today about the Japanese buying up Westinghouse?! That is this dynamic in action.) Both Ford and GM teeter on bankruptcy (Chrysler was already bought by foreigners). Our country's net savings just went negative.

      Unemployment stats have little to do with reality. I distinctly recall that cooking the unemployment rate started under Reagan -- slight fudging of the algorithms will do the trick. The AFL-CIO's stats, using 1970s methods for figuring unemployment, puts the real unemployment rate at just under twice the gov't-reported level.

      As far as "growth", what does that mean for normal people? Bush has created fewer jobs than any president since the Great Depression. GDP = corporate profits and production, not necessarily jobs and employment.

      Worse, we all know Americans are working longer and getting paid less. Average real (after-inflation) wages have fallen for consecutive years; the average American now works more hours per year than do the Japanese.

      If you actually look at the gov't stats, what are the jobs being created? They are overwhelmingly (almost entirely!) low-paying service sector jobs. This is happening while good-paying manufacturing jobs are being exported. High Tech? Dying quickly -- the US now imports more high tech than it produces.

      The core of the US economy is being gutted and wages are being pushed down by the so-called "free trade" which Republicans, Democrats, and corporations all cheer for.

      Don't believe me? Consider what the economist, and former Wall Street Journal editor and Reagan's Assistant Secretary of the Treasury, Paul Craig Roberts, has to say on The True State of the Union or So Much for the New Bush Economy?

  58. Nothing beats... by coastin · · Score: 1

    a wind-up car for fuel efficiency

    --
    I lost my sig...
  59. Market needs information by snowwrestler · · Score: 1

    The invisible hand only reaches the correct solution when the correct information is available to the market. The true cost of oil is being hidden from U.S. citizens by a government system of targetted subsidies funded by universal taxation. Since the tax is applied universally, the public does not experience the true connection between cost and product, and therefore it not incented to move to lower-cost products.

    Universal health insurance causes a similar effect in health care prices. When it costs the same to go to the emergency room as it does to go to the local clinic, the average person does not discern a financial reason to choose one over the other. The insurance system does experience the price difference, but rather than exposing the person to it, distributes it equally among all actors. The result is a greater financial burden on all, with no free-market mechanism to correct it. The problem is typically then solved by regulatory oversight, which introduces a new cost to the system.

    --
    Build a man a fire, he's warm for one night. Set him on fire, and he's warm for the rest of his life.
  60. Heh.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And if most Euros didn't resort to buggery your statement might mean something to most of us...

  61. Put solar on your house, not the car by protonbishop · · Score: 4, Interesting
    disclaimer: that's what I do(I have a electric car, so I plug it in at night).

    Putting solar cells on your car is dumb:

    1. deal with aerodynamics (not a problem with my house)
    2. can't orient cells correctly (hard enough finding a close parking space, now you have to have one in the sun, with a WSW tilt (for us northern hemispherians)
    3. ANY SHADE across solar panels, even a tree branch, dramatically decreases its efficiency (like having one dead battery in your flashlight: the whole thing fails).
    4. size matters... 1kW system is about 120 square feet -- that's just not going to power much of a car. Consider 400wh to power car one mile & assume you get 5 equivalent hours/day parking & 30 square foot car top. That's enough power to drive 4 miles when the sun shines.

    Having PV grid-tied, means you feed electricity onto the grid at typically peak usage times, then recharge your car at night at off peak rates.

    1. Re:Put solar on your house, not the car by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What kind of electric car do you have? How do you like it?

    2. Re:Put solar on your house, not the car by protonbishop · · Score: 1

      Toyota RAV4EV -- Mostly sold as fleet vehicles, but Toyota was nice enough to sell about 400 to the general public a few years ago. 100 miles to the charge, 70+ miles per hour, it's a real car. Yes, it's a great car.

  62. Re:Go VW! Diesel is more! by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Informative

    A Prius' real-world mileage is less than a Golf or Jetta TDI, so it's about a wash.

    Meanwhile, the Prius doesn't run on any alternative fuels, while the TDI will (with some degree of modification, NOT including engine internals) run on vegetable oil. Veggie oil kits will run you $650 to abotu $1200 depending on what kind you get. The higher-dollar kind is a single-tank conversion (from Elsbett) that lets you put diesel, kerosene, veggie oil, whatever into the same tank. I'm planning to get it for my Mercedes 300SD.

    Assuming we're not going to cut down our vehicle use, there is only one rational answer to propelling them, assuming current technology: Build a bunch of hydroponic algae farms for the production of biodiesel. The leftovers can be used for fertilizer, and meanwhile the algae will be producing oxygen that we need desperately given that we're destroying oceanic life at unprecedented rates and oceanic algae is the source of the vast majority of our oxygen.

    Hybrids won't help here, and the total energy cost of the hybrid is probably a LOT higher than a TDI, given the batteries and electrical system.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  63. did he say pbr? by brock+bitumen · · Score: 1

    pbr anyone? i for one support our new drunken overlords

  64. Quite a bit... by DerekLyons · · Score: 2, Funny

    So solar power goes from providing 1x10-1000000000 of our power supply to providing 1.1x10-1000000000, that's a *lot* more prevalent - yes!

  65. No need to worry... by ChiChiCuervo · · Score: 1

    ... about that. The Iranians and the Russians, Venezuelans, Albertans, et. al. will take care of that for us.

  66. aaaaaannnd.... by raygundan · · Score: 1

    They'll pay a couple hundred bucks to whoever recycles the pack, as an incentive for owners, mechanics, and junkyards to do so. It's like the bottle deposit some states have, only much, much larger.

  67. If I put solar on my house will it burn up my car? by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 2, Interesting

    But, do you park your car at home? Most people park at work.

    The best thing to do, IMHO, is to:

    1. get a plug-able biodiesel hybrid car. (most hybrids don't plug in)
    2. drive to the nearest park and ride or carpool to work.
    3. plug in your biodiesel hybrid car at the park and ride or work carpool lot - either to wind-power or solar-power or hydro-power.
    4. PROFIT!

    Nothing wrong with having solar in your house, but it's best used there if you're:
    a. retired;
    b. working at home;
    c. taking the biodiesel bus or hydro-powered SkyTrain to worl; or
    d. using it to heat the hot water heater or provide passive solar stored for evening heat.

    [ok, so I was one of the first 100 Solar Energy Society of Canada members ...]

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  68. 10%/year..Gotta call FUD/Bullshit by lwiniarski · · Score: 2, Informative

    I agree it's not economical, but 10%/year degradation is FUD.
    More like 1-2%/year for good panels in normal radiation.

    (10-20% over TEN years)

    Here's a graph..(read down)
    http://www.solarstorms.org/Svulnerability.html

  69. you use this word efficiency... by YesIAmAScript · · Score: 1

    I do not think it means what you think it does.

    --
    http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/8/20/95
    1. Re:you use this word efficiency... by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      True enough- I should have said gas usage. But then again, as a rule based on LOCAL input vs LOCAL output, erg for erg grid power is the absolute best way we've got to charge batteries, because it's not being generated locally.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  70. My TDI was crappy by freshfromthevat · · Score: 1

    I had major issues with my 2000 TDI New Beetle. We had 3 disabling events in the 4th year of ownership. Mileage between 60K and 80K miles. Even though my other car (a 1994 Lexus ES300) has 240,000 miles on it and the New Beetle was totally paid off we felt compelled to dismiss the Beetle.

    During its first 60,000 miles we were seeing about 750 miles per tank at about 45 miles per gallon. It was a wonderful thing. However, this does not overcome a basic unreliability of the car (coupled with the inability of the local VW service people in Orlando to deal with it). Consumers Reports showed the New Beetle as no longer having the expected reliability as they showed in 2000 when we first started considering it.

    In addition to basic motor problems the car had cosmetic defects caused by normal wear -- namely the plastic covering on parts was disintegrating.

    Your Mileage May Vary (I had to say that).

    On another related subject.. what I really want is a hybrid car with a mode switch that lets me select how low I'm willing to let the battery go before it starts the gas motor. If I'm commuting the 7 miles from home to work and around town I'd like it to let the battery go down to 20% or so -- I'll plug it in when i get home, thank you. While I'm on the highway I'd prefer it to keep the charge a little higher. Perhaps under I-Don't-Know mode I'd like it to keep the battery fully charged. I test drove the Lexus RX400H and was dismayed to see that the gas motor ran all the time I was driving. What for?

    --
    .. Blub falls right in the middle of the abstractness continuum. -- Paul Graham
  71. Re:Solar Energy != Free Energy by benow · · Score: 1

    Better yet, stick solar water heaters on the roof... black panels with tubes of water or glycol pumped by solar powered pump to heat exchange system.. can be used for space heating at night and hot water at any time. Raising the temp of water is one of the most energy consuming things to do, so bumping up the base temp with solar can reduce a power bill by quite a bit.

  72. Fooey. by Weaselmancer · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The major selling point for any car is image. Thus these hybrids need more grunt in their exhaust.

    Maybe, if you're sixteen. Me, I'm interested in 60mpg. I'd drive a neon pink VW bus if it gave me 60mpg.

    And while we're talking image, do you think that the only viable image is some neon riced-out rollerskate with a thousand dollar exhaust system? I'd rather have the image of someone who gives a crap about our current oil problems rather than a guest extra from 2 Fast 2 Furious.

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
  73. Your source if for a PV on orbit. by HornWumpus · · Score: 1
    Earthbound PVs degrade even slower.

    But unless all trips are VERY short you won't see the expected increase in milage with the solar cells.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  74. 1000 homes != 1MW by doormat · · Score: 1

    At least not in Nevada.

    In Nevada and other hot climates, 1MW is really only enough to power 750-800 homes, not 1000. This is due to the demands of the air conditioners turning on. For a stretch last summer, it was so hot in LV, a/c units were running 24/7 because the nighttime low was only in the low to mid 80s (F).

    --
    The Doormat

    If you're not outraged, then you're not paying attention.
    1. Re:1000 homes != 1MW by denis-The-menace · · Score: 1

      That's because they don't insulate houses in the south.

      --
      Obama's legacy: (N)othing (S)ecure (A)nywhere and (T)error (S)imulation (A)dministration
    2. Re:1000 homes != 1MW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course the nice thing is that the houses are using this electricity right when the sun is beating down on the PV's No need to store electricity

    3. Re:1000 homes != 1MW by NerveGas · · Score: 1

      A decent-sized A/C unit draws around 2 kilowatts, so right there you're only at 500 homes - not even accounting for the stove or oven.

      --
      Oh, you're not stuck, you're just unable to let go of the onion rings.
    4. Re:1000 homes != 1MW by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 1

      As dry as it is out there, why don't people just use swamp coolers?

      --

      You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

  75. It depends on the specifics by KenSeymour · · Score: 1

    In the bay area, some places charge for you to park.

    I work two days a week in the Bay Area. I take the Amtrak from the Sacramento to Richmond, then the BART from Richmond to Oakland.

    At work the parking is $13/day if you get there early. At the hotel, parking is $16 for the night.

    Granted, it takes 3 hours instead of 2 each way, but I can read a book, walk over to the cafe car to get some coffee in the morning.
    On the way back on the second day, I can have wine or beer.

    I could neither read nor drink if I took my car.

    But my commute is unusual. The time spent and economics depend on how
    far your place of work or home is from the subway and whether or not they
    charge for parking. Or how long it takes you to find a place to park.

    It is definitely not worth taking a bus to avoid a 10 minute walk.

    YMMV

    --
    "We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them." -- Albert Einstein
  76. They make hippie chicks puddle! by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    Who can put a price on that?

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  77. Sustainable energy means unsustainable military by RealGrouchy · · Score: 1

    If the U.S. military helps to reduce U.S. dependence on "foreign" oil (keep in mind that as much oil comes from up here in Canada than from all mideast countries combined), then there won't be any job for them any more, will there?

    Somewhere, there's a general wishing on a star that this whole solar thing will just blow over.

    --
    Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
    1. Re:Sustainable energy means unsustainable military by intnsred · · Score: 1

      I don't think it's that easy. The pain is in the transition. We see this all the time.

      Why doesn't the MPAA and RIAA change their business model to something encompassing electronic media? Because they're in a rut and they're used to making money the way they are. They resist change.

      The same concept applies even moreso to energy and oil.

      Think of the countless billion$ that are invested in oil-based energy systems: oil refineries, tankers, drilling systems, pipelines, our cars, the entire petrochemical industry, you name it.

      A fundamental change in energy technology is a radically "disruptive technology". Some will lose out, but many will make huge money from new markets and industries.

      Let's face it, we're not fighting to take over Central Asia and the Mid East's oil because the ruling elites are willing to eagerly adopt change!

      You and I probably think, "Hell, if we would have invested $200+ billion in alternative energy instead of wasting the money to create death and hatred by invading Iraq, we could generate new jobs/industries and lessen our dependence on oil".

      But then again, if we think that way, I doubt we have much money invested in the petroleum industry. Oil men like Dick Cheney and Bush have a completely different opinion. :-(

  78. Re:But you're not... Step back in time.... by R4wBon3 · · Score: 1
    "I lived a good portion of my life before plastic became widespread. We used glass bottles instead of plastic bottles for many drinks, for instance. Somebody who grew up only using plastic might have a difficult time accepting the idea of not using plastic products. But it's more than possible, and was reality even just a few decades ago."

    As much as I agree with you about the concept of supply and demand, I still think the energy required to make, reprocess, and ship heavy glass would still use the same amount of petroleum if not more. Maybe we can go back to skin flasks?

  79. Bloody Cars! by wolff000 · · Score: 1

    your car is not who you are. it doesn't matter what it looks like it only takes you from point A to point B anything else is superficial. one other thing, stop complaining about gas prices if you are unwilling to give up a car that guzzles the stuff like water.

    --
    WTF?
  80. That's not the cell thats a panal by HornWumpus · · Score: 1
    To cut down the cost (in both $ and MW) of producing solar cells they have made the SI crystal progressively thinner.

    Unless these cells are well protected you can bet they will break under hail.

    Can't get to the sight so I don't know how these are protected if at all.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  81. Re:If I put solar on my house will it burn up my c by protonbishop · · Score: 1
    sure, I park at work (away from home). So while I'm replying to slashdot.. I mean "working", the PV create energy and I sell it back to the power company (at peak rates). When I plug in at home, I buy back power at drastically cheaper off-peak rates: much better for everyone.

    you're correct regarding all gains from passive solar & riding a bike's better too.

    bio-diesel's only a marginal idea IMHO: loads of particulate pollution, and modern western farming consumes massive amounts of petrochemicals. It's a good way to consume otherwise 'waste' oil, but I don't think it scales cleanly.

    plug-in hybrids would be ideal: charge overnight with lower cost electrons yet have hybrid to get range and avoid slow charge problems.

  82. No natural substitutes for artificial rubber? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, whatever will we make artificial rubber out of when the petroleum runs out? :-)

    1. Re:No natural substitutes for artificial rubber? by Rei · · Score: 1

      Natural rubber is great in some applications, but not in others. Neoprene is more chemically inert, thermally insulative, electically insulative, and wear resistant than natural rubber (it's more expensive than natural rubber, unfortunately). Polybutadiene is a possibility even without oil because you can make it from ethanol. Polyisoprene is very similar to natural rubber (natural rubber has small percentages of organic "junk" in with the isoprene).

      --
      It's time for Operation Crazy Plan.
  83. Economics by darkcamel · · Score: 1

    Who here really thinks that gas is going to stay under 3 dollars? If you do contact me I have a nice bridge in New York I think you would be interested in.

    --
    The Camel has Spoken!
    1. Re:Economics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You Basterd!!! I finnaly found you darkcamel!!!! You sold me a bridge, I got no paperwork from you!!! I want my money back!!!!

  84. Re:Looks like crap? by fury88 · · Score: 1

    Yes, the economy cars do, but have you seen the new Lexus Hybrid? Can't complain about that!

  85. Re:Go VW! Diesel is more! by Kadin2048 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The other thing that needs to be considered is what kind of driving you do.

    A gasoline hybrid like the Prius gets its best mileage in city, stop-and-go driving, because of the regenerative braking.

    A diesel engine gets its best milage while cruising on the highway at a basically constant speed, in the transmission's highest gear.

    I used to drive a diesel VW and *loved* it. It was fun to drive (torquey as hell) and had excellent highway range, well in excess of 500 miles to the tank. However that mileage went into the toilet if I had to do a lot of stop and go driving. Still better than a conventional gasoline car for the same driving, but nothing like a hybrid.

    I think there will be a place for both types of vehicles in the future, and which one is most efficient for you depends on the type of driving you do. For me, it's almost highway driving -- a hybrid wouldn't have much of an advantage.

    The other thing to consider is the air conditioning and heating requirements. I have heard it said that the hybrids derive a lot of their fuel savings by being able to shut off the gas engine when it's not needed (in city driving), but that if you have the A/C running, it won't shut off because there's no way to run the compressor electrically. If anyone can verify this I'd be interested ... but if it's true, it could seriously impact the efficiency numbers in certain climates. A diesel engine sees some efficiency hit as a result of the A/C compressor, but its not that significant. (I measured the MPG of my VW with the compressor running and not, and could never get a good handle on what the change was. It was below the error caused by month-to-month differences in my driving style, anyway.) I don't know about anybody else, but I am not prepared to drive without air conditioning, at least until gas is well into the double-digit dollars per gallon.

    What I would like to see is a diesel-electric hybrid: combine the best of both worlds.

    I also wish that there was some sort of tax relief for diesel passenger vehicles on the diesel fuel taxes, which are really excessive. They're aimed at truckers, but they've had the side-effect of making diesel artifically expensive relative to gasoline, and hurting diesel car development in the US. This is too bad, because it's a technology that really has a lot of potential. There are better/alternative ways of taxing trucking than putting a tax on diesel fuel. At the very least, we should have some sort of rebate program to allow diesel passenger car owners to get back the difference in taxes they pay over an equivalent amount of gasoline (if not the amount of gasoline that they would have needed to buy to drive the same number of miles, which would be more fair).

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
  86. Think outside the box... by wasabifan · · Score: 1

    Actually, the largest solar network should in part be built on the top of Prius's. Why is it that when we think of clean electric power we think we have to build the BIGGEST solar energy park? Why waste the space. Every item we make something, we should make it as efficient as possible and use solar and wind power as much as is practicle. We shouldn't have to make a solar plant like a traditional power plant. That defeats a large portion of why we are going to solar power in the first place!

  87. Re:If I put solar on my house will my car explode? by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    you're correct regarding all gains from passive solar & riding a bike's better too.

    or walking - which is what I do, most days. unless it rains a lot or I'm late.

    bio-diesel's only a marginal idea IMHO: loads of particulate pollution, and modern western farming consumes massive amounts of petrochemicals. It's a good way to consume otherwise 'waste' oil, but I don't think it scales cleanly.

    Denmark get's most of it's energy from biodiesel - using different/better crops. Think that's what Bush was going on about, even if he is a fool.

    plug-in hybrids would be ideal: charge overnight with lower cost electrons yet have hybrid to get range and avoid slow charge problems.

    Yes. I think many hybrids are or will have a plug-in adaptation available, for those who live in areas where:

    a. electricity is cheaper than gasoline (e.g. Pacific NW, most of world);
    b. lots of cheap solar or hydro or wind that can fill up when not at peak use;
    c. interruptable charging - some firms get cheaper interruptible electricity in bulk and can use it for car-charging too;
    d. they have really really long extension cords connected to massively parallel hamster cages at HamsterWorld.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  88. Don't Stare at the Sun by Ranger · · Score: 1

    I'd always wondered what that bright shiny thing up in the sky was. It's nice they found a use for it. I found it a nuisance. It keeps waking me up when it shines through my window. I've also heard that solar energy can even be used from growing crops. I only thought it was good for burning ants or holes in paper with a magnifying lens. Who knew the Sun could be so useful?

    --
    "You'll get nothing, and you'll like it!"
  89. You can be rest assured that by Ogemaniac · · Score: 1

    for $2000 you can do the enviroment far more good in less flashy ways. How about:

    1: Donating the money to the Nature Conservatory (the best in the biz)

    2: Investing in home technologies such as better insulation or solar water heat. If you already have those, save a few more years and get yourself a geothermal unit.

    3: Use the money to buy vehicle carbon credits and/or green electricity.

    Of course, merely owning a Prius means you are ignoring the better environmental alternatives out there. Owning a Prius means you want to show that you care about the environment - not that you really do. Unfortunately, you can't really show your well-insulated attic off to your friends and coworkers.

  90. Agreed; My Anecdotal Experience by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

    I'm with you here.

    I live in the Wash., DC metro area right now, which has one of the best public transportation systems of any city in the US (your Federal tax dollars at work). It also has one of the worst traffic and parking problems I've ever seen -- although I've heard that Atlanta and LA are also as bad.

    I have a 'reverse commute' -- I live in the city and work in the 'burbs, and although this doesn't eliminate the traffic completely (not even close), it does put me outside the worst of it. Getting into the office at 0700 and leaving by 1500 or so also helps.

    By car, getting to the office takes me about 25-35 minutes for just about 15 miles, and if you write off my car as a sunk cost (and ignore the resale value, I'm not interested in giving it up as I use it for more than just commuting) the expense is wear-and-tear and gasoline. It averages 20MPG almost exactly and even if gas is $3.00/gal, the gasoline cost works out to about $4.50 a day. Not insignificant, but 40% less than the cost of the metro. Factoring wear-and-tear is tougher, but I'm sure it's less than 40% of my gas costs.

    But the biggest deal for me is that my 35-minute commute becomes an almost 90-minute ordeal if I wanted to take public transportation. I've tried every combination of bus/rail that I can think of, peak and off-peak times, and it means almost an extra hour out of my day for each leg. I'm not willing to sacrifice that.

    Public transportation would have to get a lot better, and gas would have to get a lot more expensive, for it to become a viable commuting option for me. As it is right now, my biggest use of public transportation is to go bar-hopping in the evenings, since it means not having to drive home afterwards. For that alone, it's great to have. And perhaps if I had the 'traditional commute,' of driving from the suburbs in the morning to the city during the day and back to the 'burbs at night, the time savings would be there. But there are a lot of people who would be willing to use public transportation if the time and money savings worked, and right now they just don't.

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
  91. I must have missed the point... by chrislunter · · Score: 0

    but why does it matter if solar energy peeks into it's neighbor's windows? I've been doing that for years, and no one has mentioned anything about it to me.

  92. Re:Solar Energy != Free Energy by wasabifan · · Score: 1

    It may not mess with the weather system, but it sure does mess with the wildlife in the area where you install these wind turbines.

  93. Plus by StarKruzr · · Score: 1

    They're WAY bigger on the inside than they look from the outside. The amount of space inside one of those cars is truly amazing.

    I also like the whole Prius+ hack, which makes them even more useful.

    --

    +++ATH0
  94. Re:Go VW! Diesel is more! by njh · · Score: 1

    AFAICT, everywhere but the US diesel fuel is cheaper than petrol.

  95. That's not the world's largest PV system... by grqb · · Score: 1

    ...this is. 62MW is being built in Portugal compared to the "supposed" worlds largest 18MW in Nevada.

  96. Sorry, but buses suck... by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    No conventional public transport system can serve more than about 10% of the population, the physics just don't add up.

    http://mrprecision.blogspot.com/2005/05/why-public -transport-cant-work.html

    Advocating conventional public transport as a car replacement is a waste of time.

    --
    Deleted
    1. Re:Sorry, but buses suck... by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      Well, according to statistics Canada, 18.5% of people in Ottawa take public transit. 22.4% in Toronto, 21.7% in Montreal, 11.5% in Vancouver. Although the percentages are a lot lower in smaller cities, the 4 cities I named make up about a third of the Canadian population as a whole. Public transit can work for a large percentage of the community. These numbers are for 2001, and percentages have gone up since. Public transit may not scale perfectly, but it scales a lot better than everybody owning their own car.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    2. Re:Sorry, but buses suck... by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1
      There are times when it works. But it only works when lots of people want to go to the same place at the same time.

      When people are given the choice, they will nearly always pick freedom over the alternative, and they have done so for 40 years. That's not to say there aren't uses for buses - I use them quite a lot - but only when it suits me. Going to my local town is easier by bus - they run frequently and it's similar price to parking (and easier). But then, plenty of other people want to do likewise. What other people don't want to do is go shopping and then onto see my friend on the other side of town, so it all breaks down then.

      The car has taken over, and we have changed as a result. And no centralist is going to reverse that without raising the cost far beyond where it is now. We have out-of-town shopping and offices and people rent offices in old village premises. We no longer have such a focus on town centres and factories/mills. We have people running all sorts of sizes of businesses.

      When towns have tried to encourage people to use more public transport by making parking more expensive, the result has not been for more people to get on buses. Instead, people have flocked to out-of-town shopping or market towns with free parking.

      Incidentally - scrap trains. They are inefficient, inflexible and expensive. Digging up the railways and making dedicated roads for coaches and freight would deliver far more passengers and freight than the railways and at a much lower price. And trams? Inflexible buses with a high price tag.

    3. Re:Sorry, but buses suck... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I take it you have never been on a good train system like those in Europe or even in many third world countries.

    4. Re:Sorry, but buses suck... by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1
      Well, as I live in the UK, which is part of Europe, then I have been on european train systems. I've also travelled on trains in half a dozen european countries (France, Switzerland, Germany, Denmark, Belgium and The Netherlands). Your statement is often made by people who haven't been on them.

      The problems are still the same in France. Try travelling from a small village without a station to a town. One I looked into is from Mansle, in Charente to the town of Limoges. There's no station in Mansle, so that means taking a taxi to either Luxe which is about 5 miles away and picking up the service that only runs for commuters early in the morning, or taking a taxi to the town of Angouleme which is something like 18 miles away to catch a train to Limoges which is a 1:45 train journey.

      All this considers that I don't want to go to some village near there which would add on yet more connection time and that I don't want to go after 7pm (after the last train).

      The road journey takes about an hour and a half, something like 15 minutes less, and that's not including the taxi time which would add on something like 30 minutes at each end.

      Also, if you want French railways, you have to accept the subsidy of French railways. Billions per annum spent on the network. And in the UK, billions spent on subsidising rail, and yet private bus companies with no subsidy can beat them on price.

    5. Re:Sorry, but buses suck... by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

      Um those are the people who use public transport to commute. Look at the stats for *journeys* though. I use the bus for example for nights out on a regular basis and because of that I probably fall into the "uses public transport category" but it's a wildly misleading way of determining the usefulness of public transport because all the rest of my journeys are by car, the bus/train is completely useless for the overwhelming majority of the journeys I make, useful for maybe 1 in 10.

      Your own stats pretty much make my point. Transit is useless for 2/3 of the population and useful for at the absolute most, 20% of the remaining 1/3 of the population. i.e. about 6% and there are real physical reasons this can't reasonably be increased. I'm talking about conventional public transit systems which make use of vehicles which attempt to transport groups of people rather than individuals.

      There is a particular reason the bus/train suck for such a large percentage of journeys, it's pointed out in my original link.

      --
      Deleted
  97. Re:Solar Energy != Free Energy by FrostedWheat · · Score: 1
    Now, if you covered a large portion of the planet with solar cells, and used that power to run a giant laser which blasted that energy off into space

    That's no frikin' moon!

    -Dr. Evil

  98. it's been doable forever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    did you ever see those pics of henry ford bashing a plastic car made from soybean plastic with an ax? the ax bounces off the car, and it looks just like metal. and this was WAY back a long time ago. He also wanted to power engines with ethanol, saying gasoline was just too dirty.

  99. Whew!!! What a relief!!! by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 1

    Wow, you scared me there - you said solar energy was becoming more pervasive, and I was worried about a supernova or something. What a relief to find that solar energy is just as pervasive (and no MORE pervasive) than before - it's just that the USE of it is becoming more pervasive. :)

    --
    This space available.
  100. Yay cardboard! by bradleyland · · Score: 1

    Here's looking forward to cardboard SUVs made from bamboo fiber and hog spit!!

  101. Re:Go VW! Diesel is more! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's very little difference between a stock prius and a modded plug in prius, lotsa guys doing that now, and it is relatively easy to convert a gasoline engine to run on ethanol of have flex fuel capability.

    The advantge of plugs in, or any car that runs off of electricity at least some times, is that you can partially solar power it, either from panels on the roof or panels at wherever it is parked for long durations. for example, your garage at home, it has panels on the roof, the juice goes to huge batteries, you get home and plug in your car to those. It's also, as pointed out, much better suited to stop and go city and commuting travel when there is no need whatsoever for ANY fuel engine to be turned on just to drive a few feet then stop, then lather rinse repeat. electric drive is where it is at for that situation, which is unfortunately all too common. Even a high MPG diesel motor still has to be sitting their idling while you stop and go and creep along.

    Of course, to me, the ideal would be a biodiesel/plug in hybrid, best of all three worlds that way. I prefer diesels over gasoline engines from wearability standpoints. There's a reason the bulk of heavy equipment on the planet runs off of diesel and not gasoline. Most cars are throw aways, people don't really look at them as investments, because they aren't, whereas most heavy equipment is much more closlely scrutinized as to dollars to run cost, what it makes you back, hence, most equipment is diesel, it's just better quality, more durable.

  102. Re:Solar Energy != Free Energy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And what happens to that electricity when you use it?

    That's right, it dissipates as heat. ::shrug::

  103. Highly Unlikely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sure you think your p3nis is larger than the next guy because you have a (cough) whopping 155bhp. (Still driving Mom's Chevette?)

    But reality disagrees with you. Even a modest electric car could take that from the line. I have a converted Mazda 626 that can do a wheel stand.

    And your 155hp toy? I don't think so Lucy.

    How you didn't get modded flamebait, I'll never know. You're completly cluess.

    BTW- I am braggin about the Mazda. I'll admit it. I didn't make it to be "green." Screw the trees. I made it to be the ultimate sucker car. I love roasting guys in thier mid-life crisis cars.

    There is something just thrilling about taking a Porche from a red light in a 10 year old, 4 door Mazda.

    BTW- My last gas powered rod did 720 rear wheel HP. The electic is quicker in the 1/8th mile and either of them could roast your 155hp toy in reverse.

    Now THIS is flaimbait!

  104. Re:Go VW! Diesel is more! by Pyrrus · · Score: 1

    regarding AC on hybrids: The prius cannot run the AC compressor without running the internal combustion engine. In city driving this can HALF the fuel economy (~35mpg instead of ~70). This does not have to be the case for hybrids though. In a normal car, the compressor is driven by a belt connected to the crankshaft, which depends on the engine running. The other option is to have an electrical motor drive a compressor (it works for your refridgerator and home AC...) which would be completely independent of the drivetrain. It would require enough battery capacity to power the electric motor while the compressor is off, but most hybrids have /plenty/ of battery power.

  105. why to market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ask the folks in new orleans how nice it was to have public transit so they could evacuate. Oh wait, you can't ask them, because a lot of them ARE DEAD. No personal vehicle and in this nation anyway you are on your freekin own. Or ask anyone how they get that 6 foot tall potted plant home. Or, how do you snag a pile of 2"x4"s and some plywood for your weekend project? Oh wait, you can't. and etc.

    Public transport is semi OK if all you have to carry is an iPod and a bookbag or briefcase,and have a normal 9 to 5 schedule, beyond that point it starts to suck rubber donkey balls. You can't even carry home a normal amount of groceries, you get stuck with having to shop about every other day or so. there goes all that convenience.

    I know this because I took the train for years, it sucked, hated it. Then I realised it was still sucky having a vehicle in the big city,because all that does is let you see more of the crap and faster... so I moved out. Ahh, bliss!

    Oh wait, what am I saying! Disregard that! Please, all you folks with socialised public transpo living in the high rise big cities-please stay there! Puh-lease, it's for your own good! Really, you won't like low crime and clean air and a bit of green space, it's terrible! Really, the "theater" and "starbucks" and wading through vomit outside of trendy "rave clubs" is your kind of "culture", you won't like owning your own vehicle and like having a garden or anything, buses and trains are MUCH cooler than being independent and coming and going as you please, after all, some bureaucrat planning manager knows MUCH BETTER than you what your schedule should be and where you need to live and where you need to be a good consumer for the corporation!

  106. You assume... by misleb · · Score: 1

    You assume that one solar panel kit is going to last 200,000 miles (or anywhere near that) without needing replacement. I don't know how much you drive, but it would take me 10 years to put that much on a car.

    -matthew

    --
    "THERE IS NO JUSTICE, THERE IS ONLY ME." -Death
  107. In the US? by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 1

    So, if you move these pumps to Europe or Canada, they become more efficient?

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
    1. Re:In the US? by benjamindees · · Score: 1

      Less, actually. Heat pump efficiency is based on, iirc, the difference between room temperature and outside temperature. This difference is lower in the US, which makes heat pumps more efficient there.

      --
      "I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"
    2. Re:In the US? by njh · · Score: 1

      Europeans use more coal, hydro, wind and nuclear, and less oil for electricity production. In terms of energy efficiency generally electricity requires 3J input for every Joule of electricity, but efficiency isn't relevant to this discussion, only oil consumption. In new zealand an electric resistance heater is more oil efficient than a heat pump in the US - new zealand is warmer and most electricity there is derived from hydro and water.

  108. Re:Go VW! Diesel is more! by pete_p · · Score: 1

    The 04 and newer Prius have an electric A/C compressor, so the A/C will continue with the engine off. Heating is still majorly from the engine, and in the winter the engine will run more often to keep you warm (but it will still cycle off). (I say majorly because their is a small electric heater, but I have no idea when it is used or how useful it really is)

    --
    Insert wit here.
  109. Re:But you're not... Step back in time.... by AoT · · Score: 1

    It would be quite easy to locally produce and reprocess glass bottles. Then you would only have to ship the liquids in abd bottle it locally.

    As for local distribution, hmmmm. I'd deliver bottles to local stores on a bike truck.

  110. Slashdot strikes again! by ekwhite · · Score: 1

    Hi folks, sorry for this message. Slashdot has just picked up a story (that we ran two months ago!) and the resulting traffic has driven our server to its knees. Please bookmark RenewableEnergyAccess.com for future reference. Thank you for your patience.

  111. Re:Go VW! Diesel is more! by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 1
    The 2004 Prius uses an electric compressor, so the engine can be shut off while still cooling the car off.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toyota_Prius
    "In contrast, the 2004 model introduced an all-electric compressor for cooling. This allowed more extensive use of the "stealth mode" (operation on electric motor only)."

  112. Again, you're not getting the full picture. by CyricZ · · Score: 1

    If the price of oil increases, then energy used in the manufacturing process will be obtained from other places due to the relative price differences. Solar and wind power are two such choices. Hell, even wood could be burned, if it was really necessary.

    Even if solar power, etc., is prohibitively expensive now, it may someday become the cheapest source of energy. Thus it will be the source that is used.

    So yes, it does take much energy to create glass. But someday that energy may be obtained from the sun, rather than from coal, purely for economic reasons.

    --
    Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
    1. Re:Again, you're not getting the full picture. by Ced_Ex · · Score: 1

      It would be nice to ween ourselves off oil, but that isn't exactly possible right now is it, regardless of the technology we currently have?

      Sure, someday it may happen, but in the present, there isn't a chance at all.

      --
      Live forever, or die trying.
  113. Definiiton is not a verb by DongleFondle · · Score: 1

    You make an interesting point though, and it really worries me particularly. I'm one of those guys who will probably never buy a new car. I will admit, I could probably afford one right now, but I guess I'm just too cheap. I just couldn't stand to take the loss on driving a new car off the lot. Most of the cars I buy are 5 - 8 years old and I usually get 100,000+ miles out of them. However, as soon as Hybrid's came out of really wanted to have one. But just as I would never buy a used car that will need an engine rebuild in a year, I would never want to buy a hybrid that's going to need a battery pack replacement.

    Hmm, maybe it doesn't pay to be cheap. /badpun

  114. Doing the numbers... by benjamindees · · Score: 1

    As of 2003, there were 111 million households in the US. And, as of 2002, 405 million acres of forest land, with another 402 million acres of unclassified Federal land.

    So, that's 3.6 acres of forest per household, with possibly another 3.6 including Federal lands. But, keep in mind, Federal land is more than just forest, including desert, and is usually sub-par. And a large portion of US forest remaining is in Alaska -- not exactly near high population areas.

    This could all be moot, of course, since heating costs vary with climate. But, at the least, it means the northeast, with the highest population density and high heating costs, is screwed (so much for New England self-sufficiency). The south will soon become overpopulated. Alaska is still the best $7.2 mil we've ever spent. And the midwest will be doing fine with grass pellets instead of wood :p

    --
    "I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"
  115. Realistic expections. by MaWeiTao · · Score: 1

    People tend to have an overly optimistic expectation about what alternative energies in their current state can do.

    I got a Solio solar-powered device recharger for Xmas. (http://www.solio.com/)

    The thing is a piece of crap. Well, it's a neat bit of technology, fun to show off to friends, but otherwise it's essentially useless. First of all, the thing requires 8 hours in full sunlight to fully charge the internal battery. Secondly, the instruction manual insists that the unit be placed in direct sunlight, unobstructed by glass. This essentially means that for the thing to operate at full efficiency it needs to be sitting outside.

    Another problem is that if you live in the higher latitudes not only do you have shorter days, but you get reduced sunlight. The thing is rendered useless. I had the thing sitting out all day when I got it and I don't think it even was able to charge the battery halfway.

    The device comes with a plug so that you can charge it the traditional way, but of course this defeats the purpose of the device.

    It's like the hybrids. Right now they're more of a fashion statement then anything, especially the Prius. Notice how that car is far outselling any of the other hybrids. Not because it's any better, but because it looks cooler. It looks like a hybrid whereas the Civic hybrid looks like any other Civic and the Ford Escape hybrid looks like even less like an alternative fuel vehicle.

    If people really cared about fuel efficiency they'd be clamoring for 1.2 liter gasoline or diesel cars like those available in Europe that easily get 60+ mpg without all the complicated crap the hybrids have. Of course Americans, in particular, don't want to feel like they're driving an anemic economy car. Enter the hybrids which offer the thrust of a larger engine with somewhat improved economy. As usual we need to deal with the stupidity of the consumer who cares more about fashion and ego than they care about anything else.

    Hybrids are essentially an elaborate hackjob, an interim step to a truly alternative fuel vehicle. They get their fuel savings partly from the near regenerative braking system, but mainly from the fact that they're equiped with a small gasoline engine. The goal in driving those cars is to keep the gasoline engine off as long as possible. In all the ferver regarding avoiding fossil fuel vehicles I think people have neglected how polluting batteries and many of those electrical components can be.

    I'm all for exploring alternative fuels. And I think their use should be encouraged, and perhaps forced in some cases. But we also need to be a bit realistic. There are far more practical and more cost-efficient options available.

  116. Plural of Prius is still Prius by HTMLSpinnr · · Score: 1

    Sorry guys - the plural of Prius is still Prius (many Japaneese words are the same both singular and plural).

    --
    $ man woman *
    -bash: /usr/bin/man: Argument list too long
  117. Right on. by theolein · · Score: 1

    This is an idea I've had for years, and one that was even considered on a European level back in the early 90's. The idea was to pump sea water from the mediterranean to the sahara and use solar power, either through photovoltaic panels, or through a more robust sunlight focussing mirror farm.

    The sahara is pretty big and provides plenty of unused area.

    I think the idea was mainly dropped for political reasons back then in that it owuld be the same politically instable areas providing the hydrogen as now provide oil.

  118. Delayed Reply (OT) by Morosoph · · Score: 1

    I'm sorry that it took me a few days!