Slashdot Mirror


Pen-Based PDA Market on Death Bed

An anonymous reader writes "The traditional pen-based PDA market is destined to evaporate within the next four years, according to HP, and it will be focusing its handheld efforts on converged smart phone devices, such as its latest BlackBerry rivals unveiled this week -- the iPAQ rw6800 and the iPAQ hw6900." From the article: "This won't come as a surprise to many, as HP hasn't given its traditional pen-based product line a refresh since the launch of the iPAQ hx4700 towards the middle of 2004. It released the iPAQ rx1950 in September of last year, but this was very much an entry-level product and made few waves among the high-end, tech-savvy consumers that dominate the PDA segment."

281 comments

  1. Tablet PCs by PlayCleverFully · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Pen Based PDA's will be replaced by better tablet pcs.

    I am not sure why they have not caught on a lot more, they offer tons on functionality, and decent uptimes.

    Take handwritten notes and have them stored in digital format stored immediately?

    Why not?

    --
    Windows? I haven't used that since 1999. Fix the Slashdot Problems
    1. Re:Tablet PCs by hcdejong · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'll believe it when I see a Tablet PC
      - small enough to stick in a pants pocket
      - that doesn't need charging every 4 hours

    2. Re:Tablet PCs by badasscat · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Pen Based PDA's will be replaced by better tablet pcs.

      I am not sure why they have not caught on a lot more,


      Because people don't want them. In fact, the same dynamic is at work in replacing the pen-based PDA with keyboard-based models. You may not understand it (hey, even unpopular ideas have at least a few fans), but I think the market has proven time and time again that people want keyboard-based input.

      Those who argue in favor of pen-based input always talk about how "intuitive" it is, but I think that's a misnomer. Is it more intuitive to jot something down that even you yourself can barely read and that is poorly recognized by the PC than it is to simply type something that everybody can understand? Is it any faster? (The answer to that is clearly no; you can test that yourself.)

      Pen-based PDA's are on the way out and so are tablet PC's, except for those certain market segments (medical professionals, construction, etc.) that can benefit from them. But they are not suitable as general purpose machines; not as suitable as PC's with keyboards, anyway.

    3. Re:Tablet PCs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      cost. If I am spending >1000 for a tablet, compaired to 200 for a new PDA (and 100 for an older model), the dicision is clear. I, ad many people, do not have the cash to go and buy a full tablet. Plus, it would be harder to carry around.

    4. Re:Tablet PCs by BewireNomali · · Score: 1

      I'd have to agree. I had a Tungsten C during school and that was an awesome machine - but quite bulky. I cracked the screen - Palm wouldn't cover it and local stores were out of stock of replacement units so I moved on to a HP ppc. It does everything - it's really an amazing unit - except for hte fact that it had no keyboard like the Tungsten C. The lack of a keyboard really limits its functionality. The add-on keyboard is really not as useful. I'd prefer not converge my phone and pda for battery life issues - but a keyboarded unit with bluetooth and wifi on the windows mobile platform really would simplify my life. tablets are too big and expensive with too short a battery life to justify the expense. i've seen the origami speculation - and again they've missed the boat. Too big - no keyboard. On the other hand the Oqo looked promising - but it's too much money to sink into a handheld. Paul Allen had the Flipstart startup - but it looks like vaporware now. It's actually a really good idea (www.flipstart.com) - good size - qwerty thumbboard, etc. But it also looked too expensive. I need an Oqo/Flipstart spec'd unit that can take a GSM SIM card for $500 or less and I'm there. my hp pocket pc was limited by how quickly i could enter data into it. otherwise it's a damn useful machine.

      --
      un burrito me trampeó.
    5. Re:Tablet PCs by ajlitt · · Score: 1

      So.... You want a Treo. It's like a Tungsten C, but with GSM or CDMA instead of Wifi. The current Palm version runs ~$100 with a new contract or renewal with your cell provider, and the newer WinCE (if you swing that way) version runs about $300 with activation.

    6. Re:Tablet PCs by Techguy666 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Pen Based PDA's will be replaced by better tablet pcs.

      I am not sure why they have not caught on a lot more, they offer tons on functionality, and decent uptimes.

      Take handwritten notes and have them stored in digital format stored immediately?

      ===

      Well, my employer (a K-12 school) pushed me to introduce the iPaq handhelds two years ago. After a lot of poor trial results (dead batteries, cracked screens, difficulty of interface, inferior software to the Palm, etc...) I let the project die like a dinosaur in a tar pit. Administration wasn't particularly happy about that - since we had a partnership with Compaq/HP. It's nice to have the last laugh - yet again.

      Now, the school wants to introduce TabletPCs. ...And I find myself dragging my feet again. TabletPCs have two aspects that make them really useful - they have an additional input method over the laptop, and in pen mode, they take up a much smaller volume compared to a laptop. Tablets also, however, have significant downsides - for the same cost of a tablet, you can get a much better laptop, the single swivelling hinge or detachable keyboard create another point of weakness on the tablet that doesn't really exist on laptops; finally, there are no "killer apps" that take full advantage of the new input method. You can write things in OneNote and store them but then your TabletPC becomes a glorified organizer. When people think "TabletPC", everyone immediately thinks (as you have), "Gee, I can store handwritten notes!" Great. Another tool to organize data rather than synthesize new data. The amount a typical student spends on paper and pens in the entire course of her academic career is significantly less than the cost of a tabletPC that needs refreshing every four years. That's why tablets haven't caught on.

      Having said that, I still believe that a pen-based laptop has a place in schools in a few years. There just needs to be more applications that allow tablets to process or create data more effectively, rather than the traditional organization of data; the other possibility is if the cost of tablets come down to match the cost of more fully-featured laptops.

    7. Re:Tablet PCs by digitalgiblet · · Score: 1
      When I first got my Pocket PC I raved about its handwriting recognition. It reads my handwriting correctly about 85-90% of the time. I would tell everyone how great it was... that is until I let them try it.

      To my horror virtually everyone who tried it would get about 45-50% recognition. That meant I had to stand there like an idiot explaining and demonstrating how good it was at reading MY handwriting even though it thought THEIR handwriting was pretty much random scratchings.

      Evidently I just happen to have handwriting characteristics that the machine can transcribe. Oddly enough most PEOPLE can't read my handwriting. The reason I bought a Pocket PC (I was a Palm user before that) was that the HP device on the shelf at CompUSA could read virtually everything I scrawled on it, both in cursive and print. So it isn't a matter of my device learning my patterns over time.

      My guess is that whoever Microsoft used to train the recognition originally must have handwriting similar to mine. Most likely under the assumption that if the machine could read poor handwriting that it could certainly read good handwriting. The result was that it "rewards" poor handwriting.

      This is all well and good for me, but I can not support an industry...

      My beef with keyboard based input is that it has to be a FULL SIZED KEYBOARD since I am a touch typist. Ironically I learned to touch type when my 7th grade teacher refused to accept any hand-written assignements from me because my handwriting was so bad.

      Sometimes the world is a weird place. Or maybe it's just me that's weird. There, I said it so anyone who follows up this post by saying I'm weird is just copying me! All other insults are fair game, mind you, you just can't say I'm weird. "Tea-twizzling twit" would be acceptable (and alliterative), for instance as would "lackluster, hackneyed hornblower" (but not alliterative). Extra points for creativity and imagination.

    8. Re:Tablet PCs by bfree · · Score: 1

      So isn't the answer a touchscreen with minimal buttons, and your choice of keyboard? From the roll out keyboards to the projecting displays via standard bluetooth/usb keyboards you choose, and of course you should always be able to sacrifice screen space for an on screen keyboard if you so desire. Carry a small portable and have your favourite keyboard waiting for you wherever you do most of your data entry, or just nick one from the nearest pc. I really don't understand why the "tablet pcs" are just hinged laptops with a touchscreen ... drop the hinge, drop the keyboard (or at worst make the keyboard an thin, light and removable cover for the screen you can just leave at home if you don't use it for data entry). End result everyone can get what they want.

      --

      Never underestimate the dark side of the Source

    9. Re:Tablet PCs by lawpoop · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The Nokia 770 fits your first criteria. However the battery life is only 3 hours.

      I've seen it at CompUSA, and it is very sleek! It is horizontally oriented and sits comfortably into my hand.

      The only problem is that it lacks apps. I think partly because it was designed as a web browsing device, and partly because Nokia thought it would fail, there were no apps built for it. However, since it runs the somewhat open-source Maemo platform, there is a lot of opportunity for community development.

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
    10. Re:Tablet PCs by lowrydr310 · · Score: 1
      If my Nintendo DS had some internal memory, a general OS, and bigger screens it would be a perfect PDA/tablet PC. I'm looking forward to Opera browser that's coming out, however I don't like the face that it's cartridge-based (you can't just load it on internal memory and then open it whenever you want - it has to be run from the cartridge just like the games).

      802.11G, WPA support, and more internet gameplay would be nice also.

    11. Re:Tablet PCs by letxa2000 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I can agree that pen-based PDA-only devices might not last much longer, but pen-based phones seem entirely logical to me. The problem isn't the pen-based aspect of the PDA, it's that the PDA doesn't do anything else.

      I bought a Palm a few years ago and used it actively for probably a couple of months. Then I just stopped. It just wasn't convenient to carry my cell phone and my PDA. The problem wasn't the pen, the problem was the extra device.

      As I had to recently decide what kind of phone I was going to get, I decided to spring for the Treo and see if it would help me out. Ever since then, I can't imagine how I got along without it. It has a pen which I sometimes use, sometimes don't. Just depends on what I'm doing. But there are definitely many times that the pen is a lot easier to use than a keyboard.

    12. Re:Tablet PCs by hotspotbloc · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm getting atleast three hours of heavy use (100mW 802.11g and the screen full blast) on my 770. Four plus without network usage and a dim screen. It also seems to take less than hour to get an almost full charge. Beautiful hardware and decent, but somewhat immature software. Time will fix that and the lack of apps. Many of the deb-arm packages work if you've rooted your 770.

      --
      "I hate to advocate drugs, alcohol, violence or insanity but they've always worked for me" - HST
    13. Re:Tablet PCs by mikbry24 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, if I wanted to write, why use a PC? The whole Tablet PC has never made much sense to me. As a matter of fact, when I had my IPAQ I even sprung for the fold-up keyboard.

    14. Re:Tablet PCs by morscata12 · · Score: 1

      The device itself is outstandingly functional, except outside stubbornness killed its usefulness for the consumer. If there had been an early-on movement to install free/easy Wi-Fi hotspots in as many public places as possible, PDA's would have gotten the hint and all come with preinstalled WiFi/Bluetooth. There could have been an explosion of free online applications for PDAs..and if someone had worked IM into it, PDA's would have killed cell phones. Free IM = Text Messaging, and I don't see AOL charging 10 cents per 'ding'
      But businesses were lazy, and so cell phones took advantage of the situation.

    15. Re:Tablet PCs by Beowabbit · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I just got one, and I've gotten much more than three hours out of the battery. I spent four hours on the bus with one (no Bluetooth or WiFi running, but with the backlight up pretty high) and the on-screen battery indicator showed about 50% charge when I was done (although I'm not sure that's linear).

      I'd say 3 hours is about what I'd expect with WiFi on, and maybe playing music. For reading an ebook or browsing off-line, I get a lot more.

      There are lots of third-party apps available (cf http://maemo.org/maemowiki/ApplicationCatalog). However, it's a bit weak on standard PIM stuff like addressbooks and calendars. The choice I know about is , whose PIM apps have been ported to the N770. To my mind, it is a bit odd that Nokia shipped the thing without a full-featured addressbook and calendar pre-installed; they seem to really want to distinguish this product from traditional PDAs. (To my mind, the gorgeous if small 800x480 landscape-orientation screen does that quite well enough. :-)

    16. Re:Tablet PCs by lawpoop · · Score: 1

      I'm curious -- what do you use it for, and where do you use it?

      There were a couple of things that I really want a tablet computer for -- an animation app, a calendar app, and a chinese character learning app.

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
    17. Re:Tablet PCs by nasch · · Score: 1

      There are also various carriers offering versions of the HTC Wizard, a keyboard-and-stylus Pocket PC phone.

    18. Re:Tablet PCs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why haven't they caught on? Fancy chucking a tablet PC in your jacket pocket - it ain't gunna happen!

      Yes, they offer greater run time than a traditional laptop PC, but in terms of portabiltity, they will never (in the current form factor) compete with hand held PDA's.

      Why do you think Microsoft is trying to establish a new form factor http://www.origamiproject.com/?

      Am I personally going to go back to a converged PDA/Smart Phone? No!

      My PDA is just that - an extension of my desktop, a tool for a specific job.

      Others would disagree, but then I don't want Ferrari FXX/Dodge Ram 3500 hybrid either.....

    19. Re:Tablet PCs by Anonymous+Writer · · Score: 1

      the same dynamic is at work in replacing the pen-based PDA with keyboard-based models

      I've been using PDAs for years- first a Palm V, then a Tungsten T. I switched to a Treo a few months ago and I've found the mini keyboard to be a much more efficient method for using the device. It's a pleasure to use in comparison, quite frankly. I've rarely used the stylus on my Treo, although I probably would use it more if it still included the Note Pad application.

      However, I wouldn't like to see the touch-sensitive screen function go away, or the optional stylus for that matter. On-screen buttons are very useful and certain custom applications would still work best with a stylus, like applications that use GPS and maps, for example. Despite the decrease in it's usefulness, the stylus will be indispensable the more GPS capabilities become prevalent in PDAs.

      Is it more intuitive to jot something down that even you yourself can barely read and that is poorly recognized by the PC than it is to simply type something that everybody can understand?

      That's one of the things I immediately noticed when I switched to a Treo. Even though I've been using Graffiti text input for years, the keyboard turned out to be way faster. In retrospect, I simply became used to the errors and corrections I made when using Graffiti.

    20. Re:Tablet PCs by JazzCrazed · · Score: 1

      This basically confirms my suspicions, that the technology hasn't gotten to the right level yet.

      I'm also a huge fan of the handwriting recognition on my Pocket PC; however, it does require a specific deviation from my normal handwriting. At the same time, not everybody can read what I jot down on regular old paper, so maybe I'm the better for it - but that's besides the point. Handwriting recognition in Windows Mobile (I'm using PPC v. 2003, if that's worth pointing out) is good, but not good enough. It'll get there someday, though.

      At the same time, I love keyboard - even small "thumb board" - input, and I'm nearly convinced I'll eventually either grab the thumb-board addon for my Dell Axim x50v, or a bluetooth mini-keyboard. Still, nothing beats using a pen-sized stylus and writing into my Word docs while on the subway. After barely a day of frequent use, it now feels natural to me.

      That said, by and large the reason I love my Pocket PC is for its versatility. I read my books off of it, listen to my OGG Vorbis files and watch XviD DVD rips with it, play Snails on it... Oh yeah, and all that document authoring, e-mail, web browsing, contact management, scheduling crap that other people talk about. And it's all in my pocket. I love it.

      But I wouldn't mind trying out a Nokia 770 someday. The stuff the community's brewing is very exciting.

    21. Re:Tablet PCs by dubl-u · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Is it more intuitive to jot something down that even you yourself can barely read and that is poorly recognized by the PC than it is to simply type something that everybody can understand? Is it any faster? (The answer to that is clearly no; you can test that yourself.)

      Having switched a year ago from a Grafitti-based Palm to a keyboard-based one (the Treo 650), I firmly believe the keyboard is worse. I suspect raw character entry speed is about the same for me, but now I have to switch back and forth between the keyboard and the stylus all the goddamn time. It's awkward in a way that pure pen-based work never was.

      I think the reason people buy the keyboard more is that it's more obvious how to work it. I doubt it's faster to get proficient at the keyboard, but any fool can see where the buttons are.

    22. Re:Tablet PCs by JazzCrazed · · Score: 1

      Agreed completely with this. I don't really see the PDA dying; I just see it "evolving" into "smartphones." Although, imho, the real evolution would be for the telecom industry to evolve into VOIP over wifi...

    23. Re:Tablet PCs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Take handwritten notes and have them stored in digital format stored immediately?
      Why not?


      Unless it has good handwriting recognition, the data you enter will not be accessible when performing a full-text and metadata search like Spotlight. It will only be random bits. Keyboard text requires no interpretation beyond spelling correction.

    24. Re:Tablet PCs by Algan · · Score: 1

      All tablet PCs on the market now have swivel screens and keyboards and double as regular laptops. I'm seriously considering one. If Apple would release one at a semi-reasonable price point, I would buy it in a heartbeat. I think it would be great for taking notes in class and in meetings.

      As for PDAs, I have a company issued HP Ipaq that doubles as a cell phone. I have a thumb keyboard attachment for it, but I have discovered that I can type faster using the stylus and the on screen keypad. Dunno, I guess that the keys are too small for my fingers, but I have never seen a PDA/cell phone keypad that I can use comfortably...

      Love PDAs, I'd be sad to see them dissapear....

      --
      If con is the opposite of pro, is Congress the opposite of progress?
    25. Re:Tablet PCs by Tim+Browse · · Score: 1
      If my Nintendo DS had some internal memory, a general OS, and bigger screens it would be a perfect PDA/tablet PC. ... 802.11G, WPA support ... would be nice also.

      So in other words, if it wasn't a Nintendo DS?

    26. Re:Tablet PCs by itchy92 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I thought the same thing about Firefox: tabs? who the hell needs tabs?

      Then I used for a week, and I can't even imagine life without tabbed browsing. Same with a tablet PC; I thought they were cool, but I couldn't see any practical use for one. Then a Gateway rep came out and demo'd one for my team, and I was sold. It's about more than just writing: with XP Tablet Edition (or whatever OSS counterpart you prefer), you can manipulate data in a ton of new ways. We're rolling them out to help transition to a more-paperless (or is that less-paper) environment: signatures and forms can be filed digitally for safer storage and better indexing.

      Granted, I got the keyboard for my iPAQ, too, but now I definitely realize the potential of tablet PCs and PDA screenwriting.

      --
      Slashdot: News for nerds. Stuff tha-- MICRO$OFT IS THE DEVIL!!1
    27. Re:Tablet PCs by larryj · · Score: 1

      Not all TabletPC's have swivel screens. There are 'slates' available with no keyboard. I prefer the slate.

      --
      What if the Hokey-Pokey really is what it's all about?
    28. Re:Tablet PCs by larryj · · Score: 1

      Although I can type faster than I can write, I prefer to take notes in meetings on my Motion TabletPC vs. pecking away on the keyboard of my laptop.

      Others may not be able to, but I can read my handwriting just fine, and my TabletPC does a great job of recognizing it too. I can create new tasks and appointments in Outlook using the pen and Outlook converts it to text. The accuracy is VERY good. Most of my notes stay in my handwriting though and OneNote can search those notes just fine. 2+ years of notes and I can find anything in seconds.

      I find that the reason for a lack of TabletPC popularity isn't the pen input, it's that people just don't know about them. I don't know how many times I've had to explain what my tablet is. Most of the time, people think it's a great idea. Obviously they aren't buying them though. :)

      --
      What if the Hokey-Pokey really is what it's all about?
    29. Re:Tablet PCs by digitalgiblet · · Score: 1
      I thought I would like the thumb keyboards, but after trying out the new Windows Mobile Treo (plus a few other devices) with tiny keyboards, I found that my hands get very cramped within just a couple of minutes.

      Like the marketing manager in Dilbert I want a small, phone sized device with a 20" screen, full-sized keyboard, full sized keyboard and analog joystick with appropriate game buttons, plus a 30 GB drive, and 40+ hour batteries; and I want it all for $99.

    30. Re:Tablet PCs by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      They are ridiculously expensive. I have a Palm Vx, which is pretty much everything I need in a PDA. It cost me a whopping fifty bucks. If I should need a new PDA I can get a decent one with flash card and everything for a hundred, maybe a hundred and fifty bucks. Now show me a tablet PC I can get for a similar price. Heck, show me one I can get for less than 1500 Euros.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    31. Re:Tablet PCs by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      I never used the Treo but just replaced my Palm IIIx with a Tungsten TX. OTOH I have used a Psion for a while (before it died, it's a shame those machines aren't made anymore, and no, the phones aren't really the same).

      Anyway the keyboard is definitely faster for text input, However you just can't do without a touch sensitive screen if you want a useable interface. I've tried a few systems that did without it and frankly it just wasn't the same. Usability took a huge drop.

      Whether you uge a stylus, a pen or your fingernail to tap the screen is up to you of course. As long as you can tap it. I wouldn't buy a pachine where there *only* is a keyboard.

      In the meantime my Palm is good enough. Basically, there are no decent devices on the market. They all suck badly. I don't expect anything useable to be available within the next 10 years. It will require huge improvements in system and interface designs and currently very few efforts seem to be going in that direction.

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    32. Re:Tablet PCs by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      I'll believe it when I see a Tablet PC
      - small enough to stick in a pants pocket
      - that doesn't need charging every 4 hours


      Obviously you didn't look very hard.

      (not sure about the pants pocket part, for some reason the measurements are given in some sort of medieval unit that has fallen in disuse in all the countries of the planet except for 2 or 3, maybe you'll need to get your pants from a museum).
      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    33. Re:Tablet PCs by JazzCrazed · · Score: 1

      Don't forget the ice dispenser and bottle opener/corkscrew.

    34. Re:Tablet PCs by digitalgiblet · · Score: 1

      Man, you're right. I also forgot the death ray. Gots ta have me a death ray.

    35. Re:Tablet PCs by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      Colour Newton?

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    36. Re:Tablet PCs by Coplan · · Score: 1

      Speed was never the issue for me. I sure as hell can type 10x faster than I can write (especially on a PDA with the 'grafiti' script). I can probably at least rival it with a tiny keyboard (like the Blackberries). But my problem is that I want something that is a decent size and I don't want to loose any screen real-estate to a keyboard. That's why I've always like the PALM systems.

      Within the next four years, I might have to stock up on spare PDAs just so that I have them to last for years to come.

    37. Re:Tablet PCs by Kuciwalker · · Score: 0

      My physics teacher used a TabletPC very effectively - instead of using the chalkboard, he had it hooked up to a projector. He could write on it while looking at the class and lecturing, and the lecture notes were saved and put online so we could look at them later.

    38. Re:Tablet PCs by fm6 · · Score: 1
      Sure, I'd rather have a tablet than a PDA. But a decent tablet costs as much as a high-end laptop, and that's not going to change until more consumers start buying them. And there's no sign of that happening. Right now, most tablet sales are to vertical markets (like the health care industry), and that's never going to lead to mainstream adoption.

      Here's the sad truth: most people don't like using stylus-based input devices. I prefer them, you prefer them, but there aren't enough people like us to make them profitable.

    39. Re:Tablet PCs by hotspotbloc · · Score: 1
      I'm curious -- what do you use it for, and where do you use it?

      Mostly quick trips (under two minutes) to news sites et al during the day, check the morning weather, streaming music (and soon video) from my desktop, RDPing into offsite XP/2k boxes and ebooks (right now Crome Yellow by Huxley from Gutenberg). I've heard it's really good for wardriving. The RSS reader gets a lot of use too. I also added an 1G RS-MMC card for music, videos and such.

      ... here were a couple of things that I really want a tablet computer for -- an animation app, a calendar app, and a chinese character learning app.

      Animation app: One thing the 770 isn't is a speed demon (250Mhz TI/ARM CPU) and I think most any app would choke. Sorry.
      calendar app: Better news here, while there isn't one already onboard (go figure) GPE-Calendar is being ported. I suspect something will come along in the next six months.
      Chinese character learning app: Nothing.

      As you can guess it's still bleeding edge. Apps are coming, here's the list: http://maemo.org/maemowiki/ApplicationCatalog .

      --
      "I hate to advocate drugs, alcohol, violence or insanity but they've always worked for me" - HST
    40. Re:Tablet PCs by multipartmixed · · Score: 1

      Assuming your Pocket PC was the same vintage as mine (WinCE 3.0 had just come out)... they didn't DO handwriting recognition, you were expected to use their special little alphabet, just like Palm... except that their alphabet was much more like handwriting than Palm's.

      Now, I just got a convertible tablet/laptop, running Tablet XP. I am no Microsoft fan-boy, but I gotta tell ya, the handwriting recognition is GREAT. I was able to just pick it up and start writing (cursive!) and away it went. Why is it so good? It runs everything you write up against a dictionary (and presumably trains its recognition at the same time).

      The pen input is perfect for when I want to whip of 100 or less words and the machine is already in table mode. Otherwise, I'll flip the screen around and go to laptop mode. I have found that the two modes have little overlap in terms of how I use a PC, though. Which is great!

      --

      Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
    41. Re:Tablet PCs by multipartmixed · · Score: 1

      Before *that* revolution, you'll need to get the FCC to approve more than 3 non-overlapping WiFi channels!

      --

      Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
    42. Re:Tablet PCs by multipartmixed · · Score: 1

      I needed a Laptop and got a swivler. Not bad. The tablet functionality is nice to have, but not manadatory. If I were using the tablet as the *primary* feature, would definately buy a slate, though.

      The swivel laptops are also great for doing presentations, you can turn the screen around backwards towards the customer, but still hit the space bar from your side of the machine.

      Additionally, swivelling the screen backwards makes it easier to use the laptop screen when it's plugged into an external keyboard -- it can be a good 10 inches closer to your face.

      --

      Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
    43. Re:Tablet PCs by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1
      As previous posts have hinted, the problem with gadgets is you can't carry all of them at once. Device convergence is our best hope.

      Of today's gadgets I own a

      • phone
      • flash based mp3
      • digital camera
      I never bought an iPod because the primary purpose of the mp3 player was as a thumb drive. I can't fit an iPod and a phone in my jeans!

      The phone has an FM radio which is generally okay except when the train goes under a tunnel. :( My camera has more memory than the mp3 player!

      A friend has an O2 XDA which according to an OSNews Review looks fairly fully featured. A couple of relatives, none of whom are particularly IT savvy, have started using skype. If such a device can communicate with them, over wifi, I might consider buying one for when I move interstate.

      Still, the screen of the nokia 770 would be preferable for reading PDFs.

    44. Re:Tablet PCs by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Decide what you want to 'standardize' on. I decided to go 'low' and standardized on the Palm III. Now I have three of them and am continuing to shop for them cheap on eBay. The second one was $20 with a dock and a 'full size' folding keyboard, the third one was $5 and just the PDA. Both appear to be almost brand new (i.e. units that somebody bought and just never used). The time to standardize and start buying on eBay is now, they'll probably stop being ultra-cheap eventually. My first PDA was a Handspring Visor Platinum, incidentally (it died) so I scaled 'down' in what I eventually decided was adequate. And I made the mistake of 'upgrading' to the 'latest' Palm a year ago when the Visor died, and ended up with a crummy flimsy 'feature rich' piece of flashy junk with only a few hours of battery life.

      The Palm III has 2-3 months of battery life with a pair of disposable AA batteries. Those of you too young to have used that generation of PDA should look back a bit and see if the old-school Palm 3 era devices could suit your needs. They might. You can even hack 68000 assembler and write your own apps if you like.

    45. Re:Tablet PCs by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      I have a 770 (yay for developer discounts). The unit is quite nice overall (the 225dpi screen is gorgeous), if a little underpowered. It uses a Linux kernel, which doesn't handle low memory situations at all gracefully (it just kills a random process. Oh, that one had unsaved work in it? Never mind.). Upgrading the RAM from 64MB to 128MB would have made a huge difference. The battery life listed is for browsing the web using 802.11 or bluetooth. If you are not using either of these, it lasts much longer - I have read entire eBooks on mine without needing to recharge it.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    46. Re:Tablet PCs by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1
      Fat chance. Tablet PCs are more likely to take over part of the laptop segment. Maybe a small part of the really big, powerful PDAs that are a pain in the ass to carry and hardly anyone uses anyway.

      Do I need to explain why tablet PCs won't replace PDAs, or were you just trolling?

    47. Re:Tablet PCs by JazzCrazed · · Score: 1

      Haha, yea, good point...That's what I meant - revolution, not evolution.

    48. Re:Tablet PCs by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

      Because people don't want them.

      Nope. Because they're too expensive.

      Walk up to anyone -- ANYONE -- in an electronics store looking at computers and ask them "would you buy a tablet PC if you could get a good one for the same price?" and I'll wager you'll get, at least, 1 in four saying "YES". I suspect even higher, especailly if we allow for ignorance about the whole thing.

      The thing about a PDA or a Tablet PC -- which are really two different things, btw -- is that they're computers that aren't attached to keyboards. A great deal of general purpose computing can be done without them... so long as there's a keyboard handy for when it's needed. But since the keyboard isn't attached, you can take a tablet PC places you couldnt' take a laptop, and use a PDA in ways you'd never use a laptop for at all.

      What HP is griping about, btw, is the demise of the stylus-based PDAs. Which is as much the fault of the cell phone sales model in America as anything else. If prices were honest and people realized they really had to pay for their phones, I suspect we'd have cleaner phones and more PDAs.

    49. Re:Tablet PCs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The current Palm version runs ~$100 with a new contract or renewal with your cell provider, and the newer WinCE (if you swing that way) version runs about $300 with activation.

      $100, really?

      Sprint.com shows Treo 650 at $500 - $150 (with 2-year contract) - $50 (mfg rebate) = $300.

      There are probably better deals out there, but I really don't think they'd be better by $200...

    50. Re:Tablet PCs by adamgolding · · Score: 1

      your comments don't really apply to convertible models. the point is that pen input opens up additional possibilities, such as quick entry of mathematics and musical notation.

  2. Just as long as not everyone believes them.... by Daniel_Staal · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Fine, get out of the market. Just please, someone stay in. I'd be lost without my PDA, and I don't want a 'smartphone'. I want something I can reference while holding the phone...

    --
    'Sensible' is a curse word.
    1. Re:Just as long as not everyone believes them.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Handsfree Bluetooth Headsets will be your best friend then. That or get an Axim :)

    2. Re:Just as long as not everyone believes them.... by bfree · · Score: 1

      Use a headset/handsfree? Or do you want to hold a pda in one hand, phone in the other and the pen in your mouth?

      --

      Never underestimate the dark side of the Source

    3. Re:Just as long as not everyone believes them.... by bersl2 · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Shoulder to ear?

    4. Re:Just as long as not everyone believes them.... by Anonymous+MadCoe · · Score: 1

      I don't want a smartpone either, I's like to leave my PDA at home when I go out (concerts, clubbing etc.), because I don't mind losing my phone, but I do mind losing a PDA with all my personal notes, bussiness notes etc on it. (of course there is alwais a chance of losing it, but the risks are just that much higher, and no I don't believe that encrypting/locking wil be sufficient, I'd rather just leave it at home).

    5. Re:Just as long as not everyone believes them.... by Daniel_Staal · · Score: 1

      Mostly it's that I use a PDA in plenty of places and ways that a smartphone would just be extra bulk, cost, and clumbsiness. I have a cell phone; which I use maybe twice a month. I use my PDA several dozen times a day. I read on it, I keep my contacts, my calender, my passwords, I write on it, I play games...

      A smartphone concentrates to much on the phone. Which to me is really irrelevent.

      --
      'Sensible' is a curse word.
    6. Re:Just as long as not everyone believes them.... by timeOday · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Yeah, this stinks. I have the 4700 pocketpc and like it, in fact I'm posting on it now. We're not allowed cellphones in the workplace so a standalone pda is a necessity for me.

      With sony out and palm going downhill, where will I get my next PDA?

    7. Re:Just as long as not everyone believes them.... by slashname3 · · Score: 1

      I want something I can reference while holding the phone...

      So get a bluetooth ear piece. You can talk on the phone while looking at it to make notes, while driving down the freeway, eating a donut, drinking a Starbucks coffee. Just make sure to have 911 on speed dial, you will need it after the crash.

    8. Re:Just as long as not everyone believes them.... by ThogScully · · Score: 1

      I generally always have my Treo with me, but if I were going somewhere I didn't want to have the PDA and only wanted a phone, it would be trivial to pop out my SIM card and put it in a spare phone I have in the closet and go out knowing that my phone is disposable. Of course, if I were to lose it, I'd have to buy a new SIM card presumably, but that's a whole lot more convenient than losing my Treo.
      -N

      --
      I've nothing to say here...
    9. Re:Just as long as not everyone believes them.... by elmegil · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, because we're all slasdotters who don't mind looking like big startrek geeks. And just because some business people don't mind either, they still look like idiot in my book. Until someone comes out with a bluetooth headset that doesn't look like I've strapped a clothespin on my ear, it ain't happnin.

      --
      7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
    10. Re:Just as long as not everyone believes them.... by jacksonj04 · · Score: 1

      I want a phone which syncs properly with my Exchange server (Yeah I know it's not OSS, so shoot me). My PDA does that, but until my phone can sync with Exchange I don't care how smart it thinks it is. Windows Mobile 5 on a PDA is fairly slick, anybody know of a cheap(ish) phone which offers contact/calendar sync of a similar level?

      --
      How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
    11. Re:Just as long as not everyone believes them.... by wed128 · · Score: 1

      As a student who just destroyed a phone (taking it out to parties and such), i prefer the phone/pda to the smartphone. my phone needs to be cheap enough that i can take it anywhere (camping, biking, out drinking, etc...) and not worry about it.

    12. Re:Just as long as not everyone believes them.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get A Bluetooth Headset!!

    13. Re:Just as long as not everyone believes them.... by Urusai · · Score: 1

      This "digital convergence" is a crock. It's really an attempt by different players to encroach on other markets. Thus, Nokia the phone manufacturer might decide they want a piece of the PDA pie, so they cram a PDA in their phone. Likewise, they see a handheld game market, so in goes a crappy hand player. I suppose they'll see the massive porn market and add a tissue and lotion dispenser.

      I want my tools to do their jobs well. I don't want a screwdriver on the side of my wrench. I don't want my coffee cup to tell me the time. I don't want my shoes to play music. Convergence = crap. I want my vendors specialized on their products. This incessant adding of features is purely a land grab at the expense of quality.

      Yes, my phone has no camera. It doesn't play music or video, either. What it does is work with analog, GSM, and TDMA systems to provide voice communications. Wow--a phone that does phone things well.

    14. Re:Just as long as not everyone believes them.... by digitalgiblet · · Score: 4, Informative
      I agree, but evidently NON-geeks seem to be adopting the bluetooth "clothespins". I stopped for gas this morning (in a suburb of Atlanta) and of the 5 or 6 people getting gas I was the ONLY one NOT wearing one (and I'm pretty sure I was the biggest geek onhand). The funniest part is that people who wear them DON'T take them off. They were all walking around inside the building getting coffe, etc. while wearing their large, obtrusive ear-pieces. Only Lt. Uhura had a more obtrusive ear-piece!

      I've long held the opinion that if you gave one of these things to one of the homeless guys who stand on the street and talk to unseen people, they would cease to look crazy, but rather "productive". Go figure.

    15. Re:Just as long as not everyone believes them.... by MarkGriz · · Score: 1

      "Until someone comes out with a bluetooth headset that doesn't look like I've strapped a clothespin on my ear, it ain't happnin."

      Resistance is futile. You will be assimilated.

      (BTW, I totally agree with you)

      --
      Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.
    16. Re:Just as long as not everyone believes them.... by RMH101 · · Score: 1

      any phone that runs either windows mobile 5, or windows mobile 2003SE will do the job admirably. I run an Orange SPV C500, which is the same as an HTC Typhoon. You can get these for around 50UKP unlocked on ebay. The best bit about it is the Exchange synch...oh, and I run TomTom mobile sat nav on it too, via a BT GPS unit.

    17. Re:Just as long as not everyone believes them.... by utexaspunk · · Score: 1

      So you're not allowed a cellphone in your workplace, I would assume due to productivity and security concerns, but you're allowed a PDA from which you can post on Slashdot!? Hmm....

    18. Re:Just as long as not everyone believes them.... by 6ULDV8 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think you've missed the aesthetic aspect entirely. It's a clothespin with a beacon. I think it makes you MUCH more attractive than a plain ol clothespin without a beacon.

      I was amazed how bright that sucker is in my Plantronics 640 when it strobed as I walked through a dark hallway.

      --
      Pull my finger for my public key.
    19. Re:Just as long as not everyone believes them.... by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 1

      This is all great if you carry a purse. Otherwise I think your points are worthless.

      --

      --

      WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
    20. Re:Just as long as not everyone believes them.... by Daniel_Staal · · Score: 1

      To everyone who is saying 'Get a Bluetooth headset': I fail to see how this is cheaper or easier to carry. It is just as many pieces, and the headset's I've seen are almost as big as my (cheap: no Bluetooth or camera or anything much) phone. My phone has a belt clip, my PDA fits nicely in my pocket.

      Where do I carry a headset? In my pocket? Works, but I'd forget to use it. (And probably lose it, since I'd never use it.) On my ear? Great, walk around all the time with something strapped to my ear for my one phone call a month.

      My PDA is smaller than my phone, overall. Still it is comfortable and easy to use for long periods of time. (Anyone else around here use a PDA for hours on end? I do, regularly.)

      This works. It is about ideal. If they both had Bluetooth it'd be fun to use one addressbook on both, but it's not really worth the money.

      The point is I don't really want or need a phone most of the time. I have one because it is cheap enough to carry for my occasional use. A PDA though, I need. And the easier to carry and use, the better. The extra space for the phone is wasted: it means the device no longer fits well in my pocket, and it means it will have compromises on both the cell phone and PDA portions of the use.

      --
      'Sensible' is a curse word.
    21. Re:Just as long as not everyone believes them.... by letxa2000 · · Score: 1
      Get a Treo. It's a Palm with an integrated phone, but you definitely don't lose any of the Palm-ness. It's been one of the best pieces of electronics I've bought in recent years.

    22. Re:Just as long as not everyone believes them.... by letxa2000 · · Score: 1
      So get a cheap throw-away phone and a real smartphone/Treo. When you're going to go camping, etc. just take the chip out of your smartphone and put it in the throw-away phone. Problem solved.

      Your point of wanting to not have to worry about it is very valid. I have a Treo and while I'd have no trouble taking it to a party or camping, I might not want take it to a hike in the sand dunes. So for that I have an extra throw-away phone and I can just slap my SIM chip in there if I'm going somewhere I don't want to have to be concerned for the Treo's wellbeing.

    23. Re:Just as long as not everyone believes them.... by MrAnnoyanceToYou · · Score: 1

      Then get a bluetooth headset. In about five years I hope to not have to type at all. If you have good enough voice recognition, you'll be able to run a computer from a headset and refer to it in your hand.

    24. Re:Just as long as not everyone believes them.... by nasch · · Score: 1

      Extra space? There are Pocket PC phones that are smaller than my wife's iPAQ.

    25. Re:Just as long as not everyone believes them.... by nasch · · Score: 1

      I suspect all the people talking about HP exiting this market didn't RTFA. What a shock. They specifically said they're committed to the standalone PDA market, even though it is a declining one. That committment could change of course, but there's no need to assume they're halting production tomorrow.

    26. Re:Just as long as not everyone believes them.... by Daniel_Staal · · Score: 1

      I've looked at them. Problems (for me):

      1. I can't use a thumb-board. Sorry.
      2. It's not a convient phone. Not that I use the phone much, but be a good phone.
      3. It's still clunkier than a stand alone PDA for PDA functions.
      4. I'd have to switch cell phone companies. I don't see why that should be relevent to my PDA choice.
      (I have no idea on battery life, but I've been known to drain a Palm's battery in less than a day because of constant use.)

      The point is my PDA is my PDA, not my phone. I don't use it as a phone accesory. I use it seperately, in seperate situations, for seperate reasons. The only commonality between a cell phone and a PDA for me is that they are both pieces of electronics I often carry. Of the two, I carry my PDA more often. Why should they be one device? They have nothing in common.

      --
      'Sensible' is a curse word.
    27. Re:Just as long as not everyone believes them.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I want something I can reference while holding the phone...

      And you use your knee to steer the car? I know your type.

    28. Re:Just as long as not everyone believes them.... by tmortn · · Score: 1

      I am kind of at a loss for how someone would use a phone like a handset AND a PDA at the same time anyway... IE most pen PDA's are not easy to oeprate one handed and most cells are hard as hell to shoulder hold to your ear to free your hands... hence the popularity of hands free options. If you don't like blue tooth headsets you can still go with the traditional wired options ont he smartphones/pocket PC phones.

      For something that is much more PDA than phone take a look at the PPC-6700 or Cingular 8125. Also known as the HTC-Wizard. I jus tgot an 8125 (have a personal review at my blog, link in my post header) and the things are sweet. Additionally Acer is releasing some kind of flip bluetooth headset with their new core duo laptops (8204 model) that might solve your headset problems (if you can get it seperate of the laptop...or just look for something similar). IE its a VERY slim (makes a razor look fat, fits in a PCMCIA slot) flip phone form factor that makes an audio gateway connection via blue tooth. So if you could find a holster solution for both or one for each that would work that might solve your problem.

      Me personally.. I go with the blue tooth headset and I wear it when I am on the go. And yeah its kinda silly when you have it on but don't use the phone much (that is me too... 12 months of cingular 450 anytime and I have almost 4000 rollover min now). But its handy for the car and for talking to someone while using the PDA to take notes (hell even record the conversation). And if you forget it you can use the phone... just sucks if you want to type on it as well... not to mention getting all that skin grease on the screen (qvga 240X320). But there is the speakerphone option.

      They also both come in camera less versions if so desired.

      I am not a big fan of the all in one units. But these new phone pocket PC's with the slide apart form factor (reveals a qwerty keyboard just as big as the screen) have the horse power of good PDA's, A useable keyboard, standard mini USB connection and charging, Wi-Fi, Blue Tooth and before long 3g connections to go along with phone calling ability. They are pretty damn handy and Good at both jobs.

      The biggest crap factor is mini SD only so far for expansion cards. Full SD and or Compact Flash is where they need to get... and bigger or at least higher capacity batteries. At least these are easy to replace so if need be you can have two or three to swap out on the go. 3-4 hours full up usage is what I am getting out of my 8125.

      --
      I don't ask you to be me. I only ask you not expect me to be you.
    29. Re:Just as long as not everyone believes them.... by timeOday · · Score: 1

      Actually I posted that from my kitchen table. It's true that cellphones are strictly forbidden at work (and they're serious about it), whereas WiFi devices can be brought in so long as the WiFi function is turned off while on premises, and the proper paperwork is filled out. I can't fully explain the discrepancy between WiFi and Cellular, but cellphones do transmit much futher for one thing.

    30. Re:Just as long as not everyone believes them.... by qigong · · Score: 1
      Only Lt. Uhura had a more obtrusive ear-piece!

      Now that would be a cool design for Bluetooth headset. Now if they could just make a phone where you'd have to look down a periscope to see the display, I'd be completely sold!

      No, not really.

    31. Re:Just as long as not everyone believes them.... by Engine · · Score: 1

      or wear a jacket. The many pockets (mine got seven) is the main reason I wear one at work.

    32. Re:Just as long as not everyone believes them.... by Ced_Ex · · Score: 1

      This is all great if you carry a purse. Otherwise I think your points are worthless.

      It's NOT a PURSE! It's a MANBAG!

      Get over it!

      --
      Live forever, or die trying.
    33. Re:Just as long as not everyone believes them.... by glorinc · · Score: 1

      It's not a purse! It's a ManBag!

    34. Re:Just as long as not everyone believes them.... by ozbird · · Score: 1

      I stopped for gas this morning (in a suburb of Atlanta) and of the 5 or 6 people getting gas I was the ONLY one NOT wearing one (and I'm pretty sure I was the biggest geek onhand).

      Resistance is futile - you will be assimilated.

    35. Re:Just as long as not everyone believes them.... by fm6 · · Score: 1
      Fine, get out of the market. Just please, someone stay in.
      Doesn't work that way, alas. If it did, you'd still be able to buy cars with hand-crank starters. (Very handy in cold weather!) Even Palm, which pretty much defined the PDA (after Apple botched the job), is moving towards devices that don't uses styluses. (And don't even run PalmOS, worse luck!)
      ...I don't want a 'smartphone'. I want something I can reference while holding the phone...
      Personally, I agree with you. And judging from previous discussions, so do most geeks. But I get the sense that non-geeks don't want to learn to use a stylus and don't want to carry around multiple pieces of hardware. At least the most people I talk to seem to feel that way, and that's what the marketeers perceive. It's the great, non-technical public that drives the market, not us.
    36. Re:Just as long as not everyone believes them.... by Slider451 · · Score: 1

      The only commonality between a cell phone and a PDA for me is that they are both pieces of electronics I often carry. Of the two, I carry my PDA more often. Why should they be one device? They have nothing in common.

      One word: phonebook

      --
      Nostalgia isn't what it used to be.
    37. Re:Just as long as not everyone believes them.... by plumby · · Score: 1

      Every time there's an article about smartphones, someone posts something almost identical to this. And every time I point out that just because you don't want a phone that does anything other than make phone calls, it doesn't mean that the whole idea is "a crock".

      I have an Orange SPV 500 smartphone, and I love it. I can check diary and my email (and the web if I need to - it has proved invaluable on at least a couple of occasions) and play games without the need to be carrying a PDA. I could survive without it, but it makes things so much more convenient for me.

      And as for your tool analogy - separate ones may be better, but I know that when I go on holiday I will be packing my multi-function Leatherman rather than my toolbox.

      YMMV.

    38. Re:Just as long as not everyone believes them.... by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Geeks will be the LAST to be assimilated. In fact, we're the only ones with the know-how to know where to ram the screwdriver in to shut the bloody thing down when the time comes.

      Geeks are awed by big wirewrap panels, and fast FPGA simulators. Wannas are awed by flashy electronic toys.

    39. Re:Just as long as not everyone believes them.... by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Certainly. If you carry a cellphone, you probably don't use the phonebook function in your PDA.

      I hope that isn't ALL you use the PDA for. If it is, you only need a cellphone.

    40. Re:Just as long as not everyone believes them.... by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      will do the job admirably.

      Well, you're probably right, for people who aren't that picky in what they admire. Then again, we're talking about linking to an Exchange Server, so I've probably wandered into a thread where I don't belong... heh

    41. Re:Just as long as not everyone believes them.... by G-funk · · Score: 1

      Don't worry about it. Microsoft and Nintendo (and an assload of consumers) seem to think there's some life yet in this whole "pen" thing. Coz you know, people like interacting with devices, and they like big screens, without fingerprints on them. The _only_ answer is touch screen.

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
    42. Re:Just as long as not everyone believes them.... by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

      And you don't look like an idiot trying to hold a cellphone to your ear while trying to use a PDA at the same time? Looks pretty geeky to me. Why not just use a headphone and mic set anyway? My Treo came with one, and it just looks like you are listening to your iPod and only using one of the ear buds, hell, it's not even white! I spose it might make you look like the CIA or something...

    43. Re:Just as long as not everyone believes them.... by Susceptor · · Score: 0

      i was in an elevator with a woman with one ofthese ear pieces on, and it was blinking with aa blue LED, so i told her "resistence is futile, you will be assimilated"....she didn't know the refrence, but it was funny anyway. See, startrek is catching up. the original ST gave us phlip phones, the NG gave us Borg like ear pieces.

      --
      Fool me once...shame on you, fool me twice...won't be fooled again (our president)
    44. Re:Just as long as not everyone believes them.... by mikejones_uk · · Score: 1

      Totally agree. My PDA (iPaq 4700) is a totally indispensable part of my arsenal. It does everything I want. And what **I** want - nothing more, nothing less - is an extension of my home PC. Wherever I go I can check back on e-mails I've recieved; check my calendar etc.
      I have a particular fear of all encompassing gadgets: one failure and everything goes up in smoke!
      I, for one, am totally happy with keeping my PDA & phone seperate! Shame it seems the big boys seem increasingly disinclined to cater to people like me :-(

  3. In other news... by Rydia · · Score: 4, Funny

    Harley-Davidson has a release fortelling the impending doom of automobiles in favor of motorcycles.

    1. Re:In other news... by AtariDatacenter · · Score: 1

      I think you hit the sentiment I wanted to express. This seems to be more of which direction HP wants to go, rather than foretelling the market as a whole.

    2. Re:In other news... by OhHellWithIt · · Score: 1
      Harley-Davidson has a release fortelling the impending doom of automobiles in favor of motorcycles.

      I was gonna say Schwinn, but your analogy is excellent.

      Anyway, I'd be horrified if I had to give up Graffiti and go to a keyboard that is too small to touch-type, or a PDA that is too big to fit in my pocket. And I actually like having a small phone with a tiny screen that is separate from my Palm. I don't have to worry about my PDA being hacked, which becomes a concern as soon as you put a transceiver in the unit. So if the guy is right, then I guess I'll be going back to a paper planner.

      --
      "Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past." -- George Orwell
    3. Re:In other news... by ckd · · Score: 1

      Not to mention this is HP we're talking about, the ones who killed the Alpha so they could go with...Itanium.

  4. You know... by mangus_angus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    not all of us WANT all in one devices. I like my phone, MP3 player, and PDA being separate devices. If one breaks I'm not screwed three times over.

    1. Re:You know... by StupidStan · · Score: 0

      PREACH ON BROTHER!

    2. Re:You know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there are like 5 people like you in the world though ... so ah ... shucks for you

    3. Re:You know... by OrangeTrafficCone · · Score: 1

      this is the same argument I make for all-in-one stereo systems... if the tape deck fails, will I just not listen to tapes or chuck it for an all-new system? (the manufacturers are betting on the latter). I would rather have the highest quality components that I can afford (which explains why my MP3 player and Zaurus share the CF card format, and I have Outlook configured to update both my Zaurus address book and my phone's phonebook. If one is not working/present, it shouldn't affect me.

    4. Re:You know... by mangus_angus · · Score: 1

      No...theres 5 people in a board room who think thats what all the world wants. I doubt I'm in the minority here.

  5. Dieing? by sgar · · Score: 1, Funny

    I don't believe it, has Netcraft confirmed it yet?

    --
    If there is anything more important than my ego around here, I want it caught and shot now.
    1. Re:Dieing? by wild_berry · · Score: 2, Funny

      Netcraft have only confirmed that it's dying. The Spelling Nazis also endorsed the pronouncement.

  6. Means by poeidon1 · · Score: 1

    We have a new mobile phone company in its birth, HP which will sell only SMART phones?

    --
    They called me mad, and I called them mad, and damn them, they outvoted me. -Nathaniel Lee
  7. Just replaced my palm with a treo phone by DrRobert · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ... and I can't stand it. I could enter data incredibly fast with one hand with pen on the palm, with the treo I have to fumble using those stupid small keyboards, which takes two hands and is very, very , very slow compared to just writing something with the pen. I have just about given up on entering any data into the thing because it is so difficult. I want a palm phone with no keyboard. I guess I'll be going back to my regular old palm and separate phone though.

    1. Re:Just replaced my palm with a treo phone by hottoh · · Score: 1

      I agree with you. I see the treo has a stylus, but no graffiti? A graffiti version would make the treo 650 very tempting for me. Palm, I got by with graffiti just great since the spring of 1998.

    2. Re:Just replaced my palm with a treo phone by kvsnut · · Score: 1

      I'm a big graffiti user (and palm user) starting with the Palm III. I switched over to the Treo almost a year ago and love it. I know use the keyboard but used Graffiti Anywhere - http://www.freewarepalm.com/utilities/graffitianyw here.shtml

      The current Treo sites I frequent are Treocentral.com for news and the forums, Treonauts.com for reviews and palminfocenter.com seems to tow the palm party line.

      Good luck.

    3. Re:Just replaced my palm with a treo phone by garcia · · Score: 1

      ... and I can't stand it. I could enter data incredibly fast with one hand with pen on the palm, with the treo I have to fumble using those stupid small keyboards, which takes two hands and is very, very , very slow compared to just writing something with the pen.

      Well, the Treo's keyboard is uncomfortably small, for me at least, but many people seem ok with it. My handheld device, a T-mobile sidekick, has a very comfortable keyboard and I find that I can type nearly as fast (with software key shortcuts (i.e. w and space = with, tho and space = though, etc) as I can on a regular keyboard).

      Stylus data entry applications are slow, cumbersome, and annoying for me. I don't know how long you've had your Treo but after about 7 days of continuous use of my mobile device's keyboard I was able to touch type with my thumbs at a very acceptable rate.

      Keep working on it.

    4. Re:Just replaced my palm with a treo phone by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      Want to race? I can't write fast with a stylus. They're too thin, and I'm not a fast writer anyway. I bet I can thumb type faster tham most grafitti users though. And both require both hands.

      I almost never use the stylus on my Treo. Only on poorly designed websites, and games. Everything else is well mapped to keys.

      I loved my standalone palm, but now that I've had the Treo, I wouldn't trade the phone integration for anything.

    5. Re:Just replaced my palm with a treo phone by pruss · · Score: 1

      But actually the Treo thumbboard seems to be the fastest input method for handhelds without external devices. It can yield 84wpm for a pre-practiced text, according to TextWare's Dom Perignon III competition:

      http://www.fitaly.com/domperignon/domperignon3.htm

      Tapping on a Fitaly layout on-screen keyboard (http://www.fitaly.com/ according to the competition, is the second best method at 78 WPM. (I am guessing that the competition may be getting a disproportionate number of Fitaly users since it's sponsored by the Fitaly folks.)

      The third best method in the competition is IBM's ATOMIK on-screen layout at 72 WPM (IBM no longer distributes this; I've made an improved shareware version of this method: http://www.zlthemes.com/Programs.php) .

      The fourth best is MessagEase, a tap and slide on-screen method, at 67 WPM.

      The highest ranking handwriting methods in the competition are Block Recognizer at 40 WPM and Graffiti at 38 WPM. So, if your input method is a handwriting-based one one, then you would have a good chance of going significantly faster with a thumbboard (or an optimized on-screen keyboard). Or with an alternate on-screen method.

    6. Re:Just replaced my palm with a treo phone by Requiel · · Score: 1

      As unpopular as this statement will be on /. you may want to look at the Windows phones. For example the Audiovox 6600, tiny keyboard, check. Also has on- screen controls if you would rather use them... including graffiti. You may have just picked the wrong phone. I've heard a lot of people who aren't happy with the treo series (but of course they could be great, squeeky wheel getting my attention and all, YMMV).

    7. Re:Just replaced my palm with a treo phone by nasch · · Score: 1

      Doesn't look like they included any side-sliding Pocket PC keyboard. Bigger keyboard, bigger buttons, could translate to faster speeds.

    8. Re:Just replaced my palm with a treo phone by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      The thing is, not having a stylus would be lame. One of the most beautiful things about paper is the ability to sketch. One of the most beautiful things about a pen-based PDA is the inclusion of a stylus, so you can use it [more] like paper.

      The best sketch pad I've seen on a PDA was on the Tandy/Casio/GRiD Zoomer/Z-PDA7000/GRiDPad 2390, which ran PC-GEOS. It had a notepad application that allowed you to enter either text (Graffiti was originally released for this device, but that's not what came on it) or line vectors with the pen. The text was styled text and you could mix both on the same page. The vectors floated, while the text was inline. Very sexy.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    9. Re:Just replaced my palm with a treo phone by James+McP · · Score: 1

      Combine graffiti anywhere (http://www.freewarepalm.com/utilities/graffitiany where.shtml) with the Graffiti-1 alphabet (yahm.palmoid.com/G14OS54.zip) and you go back to a nice, comfortable Palm. I use the keyboard at times and I'm fairly quick with it but I'm partial to putting data into the Treo while on my deskphone at work; using the thumboard while holding a regular phone up to your ear sucks!

      Get something like Butler or Central to manage the side buttons (stupid, stupid Palm for not having reconfigurable buttons by default!) and Phone Technician for decent mp3 ringtones.

      I agree though, there's no point in NOT including pen input when the device ships with the graffiti2 libraries by default! I will try the new ALP os when it comes out to give me a longer migration away from palm b/c I just plain don't like the WindowsCE/Mobile programs. I'm a simple (but heavy) user and they just seem clunky and overly complex with zero gain.

      --
      I've been on slashdot so long I'm starting to get out of touch with the cool stuff if it ain't on slashdot.
    10. Re:Just replaced my palm with a treo phone by redbeard_ak · · Score: 1

      You can use many different kinds of graffiti on a treo 650. One of the great things about Palm is the amount of free (as in beer) software available for it.

      The grafitti program that I use on my Treo is Graffiti Anywhere.

      It's a touch screen just like any other palm. There are some times that I will use the keyboard and other times I use graffiti. If I just need a few key strokes, it's easier to use the keyboard because I don't have to get out the pen.

      --
      . This sig unintentionally left blank. I meant to put something here, but I'm busy.
    11. Re:Just replaced my palm with a treo phone by multipartmixed · · Score: 1

      The treo lost graffiti due to some idiotic lawsuit. I'm surprised /. didn't cover it back in the day.

      Anyhow, you can get graffiti for the Treo, just look around. Somebody ported it from the Tungsten's "graffiti anywhere" package.

      Additionally, I would really like to see the OP enter data on a traditional Palm with only one hand. I have generally found that I need one hand to hold the stylus, and another to hold the Palm.

      --

      Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
    12. Re:Just replaced my palm with a treo phone by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

      Heh. I found just the opposite. I hardly ever make mistakes anymore, and it's much quicker. I never could get the hang of graffiti. I'm never buying another cellphone/PDA without a keyboard again. BTW. How do you enter data into your PDA with only one hand if you are using a sylus? Do you tape it to the back of your hand or something? ;)

    13. Re:Just replaced my palm with a treo phone by DrRobert · · Score: 1

      Mostly it's used in meetings where it is on the desk or table. It could also be on the dash of my car or on my knee where I can enter data while on the phone. This is something that just cannot be done with a keypad because you must hold it. Also there the fact that the tip of my thumb covers about 4 keys on the thing. Plus the keypad takes up screen space that could be used to make the palm applications on the phone as usable as they are on a full screen palm where the graffiti area disappears when not in use.

  8. I hope not by hcdejong · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I love my Palm with satnav software. For me, this is the best compromise yet for satnav: it's linked to my address book, easily updated with new maps/POI etc, and usable everywhere. Much better than traditional in-car satnav. Running this on a phone would suck, too, thanks to the tiny screen of a phone.

    1. Re:I hope not by thomasa · · Score: 1

      Yeah, my Palm TX does Chinese rather nicely. Is the Roman/Latin Alphabet market the only market?

  9. Pricing matters by orangeguru · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Most people NEVER needed a PDA anyway - a calendar and addressbook in a mobile is enough for most people.

    Plus many modern PDAs cost almost as much as a small / low budget laptop. Why bother buying an expensive gizmo if you can the real thing for a bit more? Also subsidized smart phones from network operators will always be cheaper as 'unconnected' PDAs.

    So in the future we will only have even smarter phones and mini notebooks. PDAs will be gone - they were an evolutionary step to the new offsprings.

    1. Re:Pricing matters by metamatic · · Score: 1
      Plus many modern PDAs cost almost as much as a small / low budget laptop. Why bother buying an expensive gizmo if you can the real thing for a bit more?

      Because you look a complete tool trying to shove a laptop in your pocket.

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    2. Re:Pricing matters by RPGonAS400 · · Score: 1

      I have a few big problems with using a phone for calendar and address book. I do keep SOME numbers on my phone for fast access and also for caller ID purposes. Granted, if I had a fancier cell phone these might not be a problem, but why spend $$$ for the fancy phone when I have a great PDA (Sony SJ22) that has loads of features and I have a new one as a spare I got for under $50 on eBay. Not to mention all the extra things my PDA has on it like great games and a full searchable bible.

      1. When I change phones I lose all my info. If my PDA breaks I can hotsync any replacement.
      2. I can keep my PDA info in sync with my PC info.
      3. I find grafitti entry to be way easier than phone text entry.

      I am dating myself with lots of this (Sony quit making the Clie a few years ago) but my wife and 5 of my kids also have newer Palm PDA's and love them.

    3. Re:Pricing matters by RingDev · · Score: 1

      I Love my PDA. It plays my daily play lists of mp3s and wmas, it has all of my scheduling, I use it to control my MCE box, I can check my email on it, I can browse the web (although someone really needs to make a pda.slashdot.org site).

      My phone on the other hand, I want it to act like a phone (and contact phone list). That's it. no games, no web browsing, no fansy smancy battery draining crap. If my MP3 player dies, I'm fine. If my digital camera dies, my life will continue. But if I'm stuck on the side of some country road with a broken down car in the middle of the winter with a cell phone on a dead battery, I'm screwed.

      So give me an all-in-one small tablet of PDA that will take car of all of my needs except for phone. And give me a simple phone that takes care of only my phone needs. No need to put them together...yet.

      -Rick

      --
      "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
    4. Re:Pricing matters by Ender_Stonebender · · Score: 1
      Most people NEVER needed a PDA anyway - a calendar and addressbook in a mobile is enough for most people.


      Having attempted to use both the calendar and addressbook in my cell phone (which is, granted, the cheapest phone my carrier offered), I am fairly certain anyone that utters this kind of nonsense has never used a PDA for more than a few minutes at a time.

      Plus many modern PDAs cost almost as much as a small / low budget laptop. Why bother buying an expensive gizmo if you can the real thing for a bit more? Also subsidized smart phones from network operators will always be cheaper as 'unconnected' PDAs.


      You can get a brand new Palm Z22 for $99 plus shipping from Palm's website. The cheapest I've found a brand new laptop was $449.99 at Wal-Mart's website. Granted, the technology in the Z22 isn't the most modern...but neither is the technology in the cheap laptop, and they're both capable of getting the job done (as long as the job isn't playing Doom 3).

      As for subsidized smart phones being cheap, the cheapest smartphone my carrier offers is $299 with a new two-year contract, versus the $99 Palm mentioned above.


      So in the future we will only have even smarter phones and mini notebooks. PDAs will be gone - they were an evolutionary step to the new offsprings.


      Which I'd be fine with...if there were any actual "mini notebooks". All the "mini notebooks" I've seen so far have actually been running Windows CE (yuck) or Linux on an ARM processor. When I can install Windows 2000, Microsoft Office Professional, and Winamp on my handheld, it'll be a mini notebook. And I don't mean something that replicates the functions of those - you can do that today on even reasonably priced handhelds - but the actual original code itself.

      --Ender
      --
      Loose things are easy to lose. You're getting your hair cut. They're going there to see their aunt.
    5. Re:Pricing matters by Linker3000 · · Score: 1

      I bothered with a PDA as I can use it to run RDP sessions to Windows-based servers and also use PockeTTY to SSH into our linux servers for emergency remote support without having to lug even a small footprint laptop around when I am 'off duty'.

      I also use it to test wifi strength around buildings and to sniff out open access points. Oh, and of course it syncs with my desktop calendar.

      My iPAQ fits easily into a trouser or suit pocket. On phones the screen is too small and I don't want a phone with a large screen 'cos then I'd have a stupidly large phone.

      --
      AT&ROFLMAO
    6. Re:Pricing matters by jaseuk · · Score: 1

      Nokia PC Suite is pretty good and comparable to activesync. You can sync and backup your contacts / calendar / whole phone and it's all synced with outlook.

      I have a few portable devices Nokia Phone, Orange M2000 (PDA with GPRS) and a Dell Axim.

      I _always_ have the phone with me, whereas the other bulky items might be left at home or the office. The major problem as I see it with Smart Phones is that the battery life isn't good enough, particularly if you start using data services.

      My phone is always charged through use of a car kit. The GPRS PDA battery will go flat in a few hours of data use, leaving me with no phone.

      There are disadvantages / advantages to each of these products, but I won't be giving up the Cell Phone any time soon. All devices are synced so it doesn't really matter which I take with me.

      Jason

    7. Re:Pricing matters by nasch · · Score: 1

      I think you're pulling stuff from thin air. Do you have some reason to think smartphones have worse battery life than regular cell phones? I have a smartphone (phone style, not PDA style) and I don't even have to charge it every other day; its battery life is similar to the regular Nokia I had before. IIRC, Pocket PC phones (the PDA form factor devices) generally have the more power-efficient processor type rather than the more power-hungry kind in many standalone PDAs (ARM I think).

    8. Re:Pricing matters by RingDev · · Score: 1

      "Do you have some reason to think smartphones have worse battery life than regular cell phones?"

      No, I imagine they perform very similarly when being used only for phone service. But how long does your phone battery hold up on a call when you've already used your phone as an MP3 player for 8 hours that day? And how much performance can be eeked out of that 'more efficient' processor? I have some Pocket PC apps that are heavily optimized to get sub second responses in heavy data manipulation on a 400mhz ARM processor, if a Treo can run at half the power, that's great, but if it cuts response time back to 2 seconds, that is unexceptable.

      -Rick

      -Rick

      --
      "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
    9. Re:Pricing matters by lawpoop · · Score: 1

      "Why bother buying an expensive gizmo if you can the real thing for a bit more? "

      You're paying for size and convience, not computing power. People use PDAs because you can carry one around in your pocket and use it standing up, holding it in one hand. People prefer digital over paper because you have 1. infinite editability and 2. perfect copy-ability for sharing with your other apps and with other people's digital devices.

      Which would you rather carry -- a calender/address book the size of a notepad, or one the size of an 8x10 book that you can only use if you set it on a table or on your lap?

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
    10. Re:Pricing matters by nasch · · Score: 1

      If you need maximum performance, and you often listen to your MP3 player for 8 hours a day, then I imagine that 1) a smartphone is not for you and 2) you're in a very very small group of people. :-)

    11. Re:Pricing matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i use either pocketfeed, avantgo or this
      e

  10. Origami will probably replace PDAs by HighOrbit · · Score: 1, Informative

    From what I read on MSNBC http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11636942/ , the Origami project will be a paperbook sized tablet computer (i.e. a PDA on steroids) that will run regular Win-XP instead of the crippled CE or XP-embeded found on most PDAs. Basically the PDA will evolve from an embedded system with limited functionality into a more full-featured portable PC with full multi-media capability. This will could also be a threat to the iPod, since the Origami box would also be a portable player, but with other features included.

    1. Re:Origami will probably replace PDAs by BewireNomali · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In theory a PDA should have been a threat to the IPOD as well. IT's clear the IPOD's selling point isn't functionality per se.

      My ppc plays videos and music (via a 1 gig sd card). I also have bluetooth (used mostly for DUN) - Wifi. I can do basical word processing and spreadsheet functions - surf the web, read ebooks, play games, skype, instant message... just a wide range of things at a cost on par with and in some instances below the cost of an IPOD.

      Origami is going to need cool factor and the right price point to be effective because feature filled handhelds are already here - and no one wants them.

      --
      un burrito me trampeó.
    2. Re:Origami will probably replace PDAs by linwoes · · Score: 1

      Check out the OQO at http://www.oqo.com./ Dimensions are tiny at: 4.9" x 3.4" x .9" And will will run XP Home, Pro, or tablet. Yes it is expensive at ~ $2000.00 US but, with the dock station it could replace a typical laptop + PDA for many people. Yes it is pen based but I think it will be around in 4 years if only they can drop the price. Full specs from site: 1GHz processor 30GB hard drive (shock-mounted) 512MB RAM 4.9" x 3.4" x .9" 14 ounces 800 x 480 W-VGA 5" display (indoor/outdoor readable) 3D accelerated graphics with 8MB video RAM QWERTY thumb keyboard with mouse buttons and TrackStik® WiFi® Bluetooth® USB 2.0 FireWire® (1394) 3.5mm stereo headphone jack Microphone Pen-based digitizer

    3. Re:Origami will probably replace PDAs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nokia is a step ahead of MS:

      http://www.nokia.com/770

      The 770 tablet is practically all of Origami with the added bonus of open source goodness.

    4. Re:Origami will probably replace PDAs by Ullteppe · · Score: 1
      I think you're right. These devices already exist, Sony released an almost-PDA sized full PC last year. 20 GB disk, 512M RAM, 800x600 touch-screen. Now if Intel can improve power-consumption beyond the current 2-3 hours, these devices will be all conquering.

      Today's PDAs have two main problems: They cannot run standard PC software, and they lack storage (no hard-drive). The last point is also the Achilles' Heel of the PSP, which could have been a hit if Sony didn't spend all their time trying to lock it down.

  11. Going the way of the pager by engagebot · · Score: 2, Insightful

    PDAs are slowly going the way of the pager.

    As soon as you have devices that do everything a PDA does, but better and still cheap, the PDA as it is now will disappear. The problem is a lot of these devices now try to do everything, but don't do anything well (and they're expensive). Once that begins to change, it will be no surprise.

    That's what i thought the origami was going to be. Why not have a blackberry-type device which is super easy to use, works perfectly with Exchange, and has all the cool pen-based pda functionality. As long as they could pull it off without being cumbersome, i think it would work. Thats why some devices succeed and some fail: crappy ones are too cumbersome to actually use.

    --
    Han shot first.
    1. Re:Going the way of the pager by elmegil · · Score: 1

      "Better" in terms of display is not going to happen any time soon. Not in a telephone form factor anyway. My PDA has one of the biggest screens available, and I'd go bigger if 1) it wasn't a luggable rather than a portable and 2) it ran palmOS.

      --
      7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
    2. Re:Going the way of the pager by 0xdeadbeef · · Score: 1

      A device that does everything that a PDA does is a PDA. Rebranding it a "smartphone", or giving it a keyboard does not change that fact.

      Modern PDAs have more horsepower than desktop PCs ten years ago. There is nothing really new or innovative about the new "Origami" device, the market is simply following the logical conlcusion of having faster and cheaper hardware available. It is no longer necessary to use highly specialized embedded technology to produce PDAs. So they are not going away, it's just that the word now describes a small subset of everything they are capable of. We should now be calling them "handheld computers".

      And, as the PC can do everything, these computers will do everything. Except, of course, they won't, because it isn't in the interest of traditional device manufacturers, service providers, and content producers to do so. Ask yourself, why was the ROKR limited to 100 songs? Why is stereo bluetooth conspicously missing from devices with hardware to support it?

    3. Re:Going the way of the pager by dnoyeb · · Score: 1

      Wrong. The phone has a faster UI than a pager.

      I and a lot of people that manage our schedules with a PDA don't have time or patience to do the same with a UI limited 'smart' phone. I also do not want a mini-laptop. I want a reliable handspring Treo. But because there is more money in smart phones due to the payment scheme, everyone is abandoning the PDA.

      Once you add a phone onto a PDA the PDA companies flip the fuck out and start trying to get subscription money by acting like its a phone.

      Looks like Blackberry is my last hope.

    4. Re:Going the way of the pager by engagebot · · Score: 1

      "Wrong. The phone has a faster UI than a pager."

      What are you talking about? The pager is the ultimate in quick and dirty: Your pager beeps, you look at the screen, it shows you the number which called you. Pretty fast. The thing is, with cell phones so small/cheap/easy, you might as well just answer the call instead of having to go find a phone and call back the person that paged you. That's the point: cell phones do everything a pager did, only better and cheaper. There's no downsides.

      You're right about not wanting a smartphone or small laptop. These devices are often too cumbersome to actually use. What i'm saying that these devices will successfully merge. Its not too great right now, but it the smartphones will take over eventually.

      Granted, pagers are still around (i have one from the hospital), but how many business users that used to have pagers now just have a cell or blackberry?

      --
      Han shot first.
    5. Re:Going the way of the pager by biglig2 · · Score: 1

      Well, the smartphone is in many cases more than a PDA with a phone in it. There are indeed such devices - regular PDAs with phone capability built in. And many people like them. Problem is, they aen't the shape or size of a cellphone.

      Queue huge ammounts of effort to make a PDA the size of a cellphone, with fair sucess I think. My Sony P910 is the size and shape of a large cellphone, and I can live with that. The screen is smaller than a Palm, but it's big enough for what I need it for.

      If I needed smaller still, then I could give up the touchscreen and use a Symbian Series 60 device, which is the size of a regular cellphone. These devices are surprisingly capable - Steve Lichfield, for example, just moved the Nokia 6630 to the top of his Symbian PDA A-List - http://3lib.ukonline.co.uk/alistcurrent.htm

      --
      ~~~~~ BigLig2? You mean there's another one of me?
    6. Re:Going the way of the pager by The+Conductor · · Score: 1

      There is a bit of a niche market where pagers will live on for some time. And the killer feature not available anywhere else is the fact that it works in the middle of the Atlantic Ocean. I speak, of course, of satellite pager service.

    7. Re:Going the way of the pager by dnoyeb · · Score: 1

      A phones UI can handle more functions than a pager without added complexity. But a phone can not handle typing notes faster than a PDA with a keyboard or stylus. So pager to phone is easy, but PDA to phone is hard.

      These devices will not successfully merge. There are two distinct camps. PDA camp. Cellphone camp. For me the merger is in Treos and Blackberry's. However, you can see there are TONS more cellphones from everywhere that hardly meet the UI of a PDA.

      So I recognize the cellphone folks that consider PDA an afterthought. I hope they recognize us PDA folks that have phones just for emergencies and perhaps text messaging.

  12. The "Death of Form Factor" Myth by Yst · · Score: 0, Redundant

    It surprises me how persistent predictions of this kind are, no matter how equally persistent their failures to fulfill themselves.

    The "desktop replacement" will supplant the beige box as the home computer, any number of futurists have proclaimed over the years. Counting at least ten years since I heard that one pronounced widely for the first time, it doesn't seem to have done so.

    Or the tablet PC and, years earlier, the HPC will supplant the laptop. Still waiting on that one, but no especially strong signs at present.

    The fact of that matter is, varying form factors serve their varying purposes, and they will continue to. A 1.8" wide screen is not a 2.4" wide screen is not a 4" wide screen is not a 6" wide screen. And they serve their varying purposes.

    This is just HP predicting that their R&D investments and chosen product lines will be the right once. And a great surprise that always is, when a company predicts that the technologies it decides to develop...are the ones it endorses. Who could have foreseen such a thing?

    --
    Karma: Chameleon (comes and goes)
    1. Re:The "Death of Form Factor" Myth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree about stupid predictions:
      Don't forget about the prediction that Linux will replace Windows on the Desktop.

    2. Re:The "Death of Form Factor" Myth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "Don't forget about the prediction that Linux will replace Windows on the Desktop."

      Yeah, who would have thought it'd be MacOS X instead? Heh.

  13. Their dead, and thats why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thats why HP's new iPAQ hw6900 has none other than a sylus and touch screen, LIKE ALL PDAS!

    PDA's aren't dead. Just expect to have a Radio capability on them from now on. Whether you buy service for it or not is up to you. Thats kind of like saying "PC's are dead!" because all PC's now come with a IEEE 1394 interface and Ethernet Card. Its still a PC. That doesn't make it a server or a media station.

    I wonder if HP believes their own nonsense or if they are splitting hairs to try to reposition themselves in the phone market.

  14. Expensive toys by DrWho520 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    the high-end, tech-savvy consumers

    Do you mean the early adopters who are willing to spend way to much on a piece of kit so they can flaunt their technical superiority? I wear a watch, I carry a planner and I have a pen. My watch is self winding (yes, it is even an analog watch), I recharge my planner once a year (calendar refils) and a pen is always at hand. I guess that just leaves the effort of finding the correct date and writing something down. Oh, and manually checking the schedule.

    --
    The cancel button is your friend. Do not hesitate to use it.
    1. Re:Expensive toys by PhakeDC · · Score: 1

      If only you had told me that before I got involved with my crappy Win2003 PocketPC device? :-/

    2. Re:Expensive toys by hcdejong · · Score: 1

      Funny. I bought a Palm because I was sick and tired of the limitations of paper:
      - no search function
      - marginal legibility of my handwriting
      - having to manually synchronize my paper schedule with whatever I use in the office
      - individual notes tend to get lost, esp. when written on small snippets of paper
      - no filing system
      - having to carry 2 diaries around when it's near the switchover date
      - having to re-enter the same information multiple times (recurring appointments, year changeover)
      - limited storage space on my person (I'd have to use a briefcase to carry on paper what I've got in the Palm)
      Well worth the cost for me. 'flaunting my technical superiority' has nothing to do with it.

    3. Re:Expensive toys by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

      ...And your way of doing things is supposed to be better for everyone?

  15. T-Mobile MDA by bahwi · · Score: 1

    T-Mobile has (finally) updated their MDA line with the MDA IV. It's awesome. It's pen based, keyboard based(like a sidekick mini), runs Windows Mobile 5, has transcriber support, touchscreen, everything. And it's a phone. =)

    I think HP just doesn't like that their stuff isn't innovative anymore(neither is T-Mobile, it's just a rebranded HTC Wizard or Qtek 9100 or I-Mate something or other, I forget who the actual manufacturer is, but...) whereas HP has released the same old stuff for as long as I can remember. I looked at the iPaqs and they're the same as they ever were!

    I'm enjoying the MDA but I know other, better ones will be coming out with other providers as well. There's always something out there, HP just can't get it right. They did it first, and did it best for awhile, but now it's over.

    1. Re:T-Mobile MDA by guyfromindia · · Score: 1

      *offtopic warning* (...sorry... ) Can you highlight the 'phone reception' of the MDA IV? Some of my buddies were saying that the antenna is not as good as the SDA, or other regular Nokia phones...and the phone fails to pick up signal in fringe areas where other phones do pick up...

    2. Re:T-Mobile MDA by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 1

      The MDA is really a nice device. So nice, in fact, that I'm typing this comment on it right now. I could be in an airport connected with Wi-Fi (which the MDA has), or crusing down the highway at 75mph (riding in a bus, of course). Actually, right now I'm sitting in class connected through the campus wireless network.

      The MDA has all the power of a PDA, with plenty of memory, a decent (though slow by Windows Mobile standards) CPU, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, a 240x320 touchscreen, stereo audio (that sounds quite good), a keyboard, a miniSD slot for expansion, 1.3 megapixel camera, and, of course, a quadband GSM phone with EDGE.

      It charges off of USB (with a standard mini-B connector), lets me talk for 10 hours on a charge, and does pretty much everything that you didn't think a phone should do.

      FYI, the MDA is manufactured by HTC, the same company that makes the Treo 650, Dell Axim, and a bunch of other devices.

      Why shouldn't a device do everything?

    3. Re:T-Mobile MDA by bahwi · · Score: 1

      Haven't had any trouble so far, but haven't really been anywhere that I'd lose signal. Sorry.

  16. Some people like PDAs by digitaldc · · Score: 1

    Some people do not want a phone/camera/PDA/media player in one device. Some people have these already as separate devices, and don't see a need to keep buying the 'latest and greatest' gadget just to be 'cool/hip/whatever.'

    I don't think that the PDA will go away as long as the PDA's power/speed increases and the price stays low.

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
    1. Re:Some people like PDAs by faedle · · Score: 1

      That's just it.

      The people who actualy NEED a PDA (professionals and whatnot) don't WANT to carry seperate devices. They want it all in one place, simply because (get this clue) they aren't geeks who want to carry fifty toys around. They want one simple device.

      Even more importantly: the right "converged" device saves them time and money. If I want to make a phone call, what sense does it make to have to get the number out of the PDA and beam it to my phone? With my Treo, I simply start typing the person's name, and there's the number. I push the Green Button, and off the call goes. If I have a scheduled call with a client, my address book record is linked to the phone number. One push of the Big Green Button and *woosh*, off it goes. I can push another button on my device to record the call, attach it to a DayNotez entry, and it'll all show up on my PC the next time I sync. I can download a new MP3, save it directly into my device's mp3 player, and it's all there. And Sudoku works great.

      Lastly: my PDA, phone, digital camera, and MP3 player are now effectively covered by one $2.50/month insurance policy from my provider. If I drop/break/lose it, guess what? $50 replaces the whole deal.

      PDAs are dead. All Hail the Great PDA.

  17. How "pen-based" are we talking about? by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 1

    My lifelong use of a pocket-sized memo pad and a ballpoint pen hasn't once crashed on me yet.

    1. Re:How "pen-based" are we talking about? by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      That ink stain on your shirt pocket says otherwise. :)

    2. Re:How "pen-based" are we talking about? by Dreffed · · Score: 1

      I have to jump into that pen and notebook camp... I've had PDAs either through upgrades or incompatibilities one feature or another that I became reliant on stop functioning. Eventually after several attempts at the PDA markets (spanning Psion II and IIIe, Windows CE devices 1.0 amd 2.0, Palm) I have gone back to the staple notebook and pen, I keep them and have them for easy searching.
      The only device I think could possibly answer my need is the OQO http://www.oqo.com/hardware/basics/ device, but then this still seems beta tech and I'll wait a few years before jumping.
      ...unless someone wants to give me one for testing etc.

      --
      -=(0)=- Dreffed Correct me if I am in error, teach me if I make a mistake... but don't flame me If I cross the line
  18. Death of PDA by VeryHotTopic · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The PDA (personal digital assistant) is simply changing shape. It's called the cellphone. We need our cellphones. Take a look at Japanese cellphones. They are used as e-wallets, garage door openers, gym membership verifiers, 3 way video conference communicators, and so on. With the advent of e-ink and flexible display technology, we can expect larger screens with higher resolution and lower power consumption that roll out. Take a look at the images at e-ink.com. The PDA is not dead. The personal digital assistant is simply changing shape to accommodate the needs of people the world round.

    1. Re:Death of PDA by releppes · · Score: 1

      It's too bad your views are in the majority. I'm not against the all-in-one technology. In fact, I think combining appliances only makes sense. But what I can't stand is the merging of my personal technology devices being tied to a service related technology like cell phones. My preference is to keep stuff like that totally separate. I switch my services all the time (to save money). I'd rather not have my PDA tied to such things. The only thing I want in a phone is to make a phone call. I think combining a walkie talkie with a cell phone is a great idea....but it stops there. Now just because I like my devices separate, I do wish them all to operate together. So I think all phones, mp3s, cameras, pda...should all have a common communication technology (bluetooth) for easy communication. Just my feelings.

    2. Re:Death of PDA by VeryHotTopic · · Score: 1

      I never thought about it that way. Thanks for the input.

  19. wheelbarrows will probably replace backpacks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft has decided to get into the outdoor industry and wipe out Northface et al., by introducing a wheelbarrow that can carry much more than any backpack ever could. While extremely convenient and not much larger than a backpack, the wheelbarrow offers all kinds of extra features and ... oh, i'm losing my will to live ... must post ...

  20. Palm was the PDA king for years by bensafrickingenius · · Score: 1

    And I was a rabidly loyal subject. For years, each new Palm I bought was exponentially better than the last. I went from the Pilot, to the III, to the V -- and then things started getting shitty. They'd still put kick-ass feature upgrades into each new rev, the Tungsten C being a very dramatic example, but the quality was going down at an even faster rate. We bought maybe 20 Tungsten C's, and the failure rate within 6 months was maybe 33%. Then we moved on to the Life Drive (again, STELLAR feature set) and I had mine replaced 3 times in the first 2 months. With quality control like that, it doesn't matter at all if everyone still wants to go the PDA route -- they're gonna go the way of the dinosaurs anyway. Oh, let's not forget the constantly shrinking support model. From ever tinier initial warranty periods, to ever larger repair costs, to the inevitable move of tech support to India, they totally betrayed us in the support realm. Goodbye, Palm, we hardly knew ye.

    --
    I am not left-handed, either!
    1. Re:Palm was the PDA king for years by jfaughnan · · Score: 1

      Ahh, yes. I recall those days well. Microsoft had strong-FUD then, and the market turned from Palm. They panicked even as they were distracted by dotCom dreams. Quality went down the tubes. They never revised a multi-user desktop environment built for Win98 when a true multi-user OS (XP) came out. Indeed, multi-user support was miserable with conflicting conduits. Heaven forbid one family member should have a CLIE! Worst of all were the deep and irreconcialable data model conflicts with Exchange server -- once Exchange destroyed all competition Palm was out in the cold. I trace my hair loss directly to Palm synchronization issues with Exchange server.

      Then there are little things, like categories in appointments. Fixed yes, but far too late. Or the disastrous shift from Grafitti One to G2 after the initial loss to Xerox.

      I very much need/want a pocketable computer, which still means stylus and pen driven. Alas, I am a market of One. I'll have to make do with whatever is provided for the mass market, but I've a feeling I won't like it much.

      --
      John Faughnan
      jfaughnan@spamcop.net
  21. Tried it, don't use it by slashname3 · · Score: 1

    Tried using a Palm VII a few years ago. It kind of worked. But eventually gave up on it. It was more hassel that it was useful.

    1. Re:Tried it, don't use it by mad_minstrel · · Score: 1

      There never was a Palm VII.

      --
      May the source be with you.
    2. Re:Tried it, don't use it by AragornSonOfArathorn · · Score: 1

      There never was a Palm VII.

      buh? I'm pretty sure there was a Palm VII... http://www.the-gadgeteer.com/review/palm_vii_revie w

      --
      sudo eat my shorts
    3. Re:Tried it, don't use it by slashname3 · · Score: 1

      ReallY? Kind of funny since I am looking at the box it came in and it has palm VIIx handheld on the box. P/N 340-1610A. Was setup for wireless access over the plam network service. I don't know that they even have that service anymore.

      They did make them. I don't think they were very successful.

  22. to quote the kids, 'omg! rofl!' by macsox · · Score: 1

    within four years, eh, hp?

    why, with your airtight reputation for being able to spot (and drive!) trends, i'd say this is pretty much guaranteed to be a spot-on prediction. particularly if the prediction was made in 1999.

    i'm just happening that someone, somewhere, manages to save the trademark 'zire'. that is a precious word, and one that we can't take for granted.

  23. Depends on how you look at what constitutes a PDA by Gunfighter · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The one class of PDAs I know to be on the rise is... analog!

    I just splurged and dropped ~$20 on a new PDA. This PDA I purchased is great! The batteries never run out, it is almost totally immune to shock from being dropped, I can transfer data easily between home and office, and the format is universal so I never have to worry about incompatibilities, and it is so fast and easy to use that even my parents can understand it. I went ahead and purchased an add-on module for it so I could have the advanced calendaring to track my gigs and rehearsals. Luckily, I already had a docking station for it with extra storage capacity as well as a variety of other add-ons, so it fit right into my daily routine.

    I consider it one of the best investments I've made in years. Spending $20 to successfully replace a $300 device may not sound realistic, but I've never been more organized than I am now. All I had to do that I got rid of my old PDA systems (Palm OS based devices) and find something that fit better with my new filing system.

    --
    -- Stu

    /. ID under 2,000. I feel old now.
  24. It's always fun ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I work for Palm.

    So I am really getting a kick out of most of these replies.

    Some of you guys are very good at making it sound like you know what you are talking about.

    But trust me.... You don't.

    I think you just want to make yourself sound smart, when in reality you don't know what you are talking about.

    This is how bad info gets passed around.

    If you dont know about the topic....Dont make yourself sound like you do.

    Because some people believe anything they see.

    1. Re:It's always fun ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK smart guy, what *is* the future of PDAs?

      You guys at Palm are not really known for your consistent story in this area are you? One company. Nope, two companies. Uh, hardware only -- sell the software company. Change names again. Anounce a new OS. Never deploy it. Just keep patching the old one. Meanwhile tell everyone they don't need WiFi. Wait -- yeah they do now that you have the TX.

    2. Re:It's always fun ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      haha oh wow

  25. Bullshit by jasonditz · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Just like how the mobile phone was going to replace the handheld video game system in a few years. Or how desktops were going to be replaced by laptops, or how laptops were going to be replaced by tablet PCs.

    Some people just don't want a PDA with a monthly subscription fee attached.

  26. Anyone else thinking of the phrase by PaulMdx · · Score: 0

    Jack of all trades, master of none?

  27. My only want? by ShyGuy91284 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I want a Cell Phone. One that isn't the size of a damn PDA, but has text input via a stylus and touchscreen.... Large Phones deter me..... But it's useful being able to "pencil in" appointments, assignments, and stuff like that on a PDA.

    --
    In undeveloped countries, the consumer controls the market. In capitalist America, the market controls you.
    1. Re:My only want? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You probably want a Palm Treo then. They're a little "boxier" than some of the tiniest phones on the market, but are still smaller than they appear in the pictures. It's easy to enter data with the keyboard and you get a lot of features - camera, memory card slot, web browsing, mobile email - and it's a decent phone (it gives me better reception than my previous one).

      I've been a happy owner of a Treo 650 since the fall of last year. I would not recommend the 700. The 700's Windows Mobile is not as good as PalmOS for being a phone, the 700's data connection is faster but data access plans much more expensive, the 700's camera is overkill for emailed photos. The best deal for a 650 is Sprint's unlimited data plan, which can be had for $10 a month.

      Although you may also need a real email client (like SnapperMail) - the built in one (VersaMail) can only send attachments in a form that Outlook recipents can see (that is, if you want to take pictures and then email them to your friends).

  28. You can have my Tungsten C by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1
    When you pry it from my cold, dead fingers or,

    When the batteries quit charging or

    When it breaks and Palm charges exhorbitantly to replace it, assuming of course, you can actually get a hold of Palm tech support, or,

    After I through it against the wall in frustration after (yet again) being unable to browse the Palm's own web site because of "unsupported download type".

    I've owned a Palm since The Beginning but the Tungsten C is my last one. To big, too short of battery life, terrible software. No FM. Lame.

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  29. They haven't caught on because the interface sucks by Colin+Smith · · Score: 2, Informative

    They're crap to use. I mean, they're *useless* for any serious amount of data input, have you ever tried writing a letter on one? and a PDA or smart phone is more useful for displaying data because *it fits in a pocket*...

    You want a serious computer, today, it *must* have a keyboard, otherwise it's a data display device.

    For those who don't want to carry a PDA, camera, a laptop and a phone, Nokia have the Communicator devices, everything in one.

    Big:
    http://www.europe.nokia.com/nokia/0,,54106,00.html

    Small:
    http://www.europe.nokia.com/nokia/0,6771,77854,00. html

    --
    Deleted
  30. HP Killed the Ipaq by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are lots of things I can't do with just a keyboard. Compaq had an amazing line of PDAs that killed Jordana. From what I can see HP turned over iPaq design to their own second rate team and killed a great line. Even used prices for pre HP iPaqs on Ebay is high because they were good. HP is a stupider company than I thought, you don't buy your competitor just to kill it, you buy them to become good at what they are good at.

    HP is following blackberry because not only can't they innovate, thet can use assets they paid for well.

  31. Let's design ou dream device by drasfr · · Score: 1

    Let's see... My list would be:

    - Small factor that I could carry with me in my pocket. Pants pocket preferred, but I could settle for belt or jacket.
    - Cell phone with high speed wireless access (GPRS, EDGE, UMTS, etc...)
    - Possibility to be ONLINE, connected AND one or more phone conversation simultaneously.
    - VoIP client integrated to it.
    - form factor with small keyboard for basic on the go work.
    - OS should be easily upgradable
    - sensitive screen so I can take notes on it with an integrated pen.
    - Blue tooth, wifi, and all possible wireless technologies.
    - Bluetooth should have all profiles enabled, file transfer, keyboard/mouse, headset, A2DP (bluetooth 2.0).
    - Infrared receiver/emitter.
    - Should be able to control it by voice as an option. Say Bluetooth headset with either a push-to-talk feature or automatic recognition. CONFIGURABLE.
    - (mini )vga-port (wireless option?) so a full size screen can be connected.
    - My favorite feature would be full wireless connectivity so when I arrive at my desk, my screen keyboards and all automatically connects to it and I could use it as my desktop.
    - Automatic wireless backup on another computer whenever possible.
    - Full encryption of content in case of loss.
    - Security by either fingerprint/iris scan/etc...
    - battery life of 10 hours when not plugged on power.
    - Integrated GPS.

    I think I am pretty much complete. Any more ideas? HP are you listening?

    I wish I could work in a research center. I would have a lot of fun and ideas....

    1. Re:Let's design ou dream device by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Treo does a lot of that. WIFI sled is available, GPS is available.

      Some of that stuff is a little crazy, like the thumb print, but good idea.

    2. Re:Let's design ou dream device by nasch · · Score: 1

      Within the Windows world, the only one of those that I can't see happening is the easy-to-upgrade one. Your carrier is not going to let you upgrade because they want you to buy a new device (with a new service contract) instead. Ditto the manufacturer. MS so far doesn't sell mobile OS separately, and they probably won't because it doesn't make sense to spend $100 on the OS when you can have a whole new device for a few hundred with a contract, including that new OS. Step outside of Windows Mobile and I don't know much. Presumably Linux pda-phones would be easy to upgrade but there aren't many of those. Symbian? I have no idea.

    3. Re:Let's design ou dream device by Nukenbar2 · · Score: 0

      Why don't you ask for a DVD burner while you are at it. You can't have that many outputs with current technology, or it will be the size of a laptop. The reason that there are so many different types of PDAs, is that different people want different things.

  32. I don't think so. by hey! · · Score: 2, Insightful

    At least if PDAs are losing to tablets, I haven't seen evidence of this.

    It is more true that PDAs are losing to converged devices, but I think that's only half the story. What I think really is happening is that PDAs are being bracketed by laptops on one end and converged/feature rich phones on the other. Everybody who might use a PDA is almost certainly carrying a laptop and a phone that if it isn't "converged", it is practically so in all but name.

    Personally, I don't think either fits the true PDA niche, which is about form factor. A true PDA is larger than any reasonable phone would be, but fits in your shirt pocket without stretching it or making it sag. To some degree the PDA manufacturers have brought this on themselves, blurring their market niche by making the PDAs more desktop like in their power; WinCE bears a lot of the blame for this. It's the classic tendency to want to blur your market position to get more sales. You pick up a few sales on the edges, at the cost of losing clarity as to why the customer should buy your product in the first place.

    My sense is that the 200-600 PDA market is in fact doomed, because the marginal value of the PDA once you are carrying a laptop and featureful phone is small. However it doesn't mean there is zero value in the PDA. It follows that PDA prices have to drop. If I were to imagine the successful PDA device of 2010, it'd cost about $100 in todays terms, and by design would complement your phone and laptop, having easy to use wireless connectivity to them. Connectivity exists today, but it is extremely awkward. Microsoft's bluetooth is positively dreadful from a user's perspective. The question is whether PDA prices will reach that point before the buyers have completely abandoned the form factor.

    There are two additional survival scenarios to consider. The first would be specialized devices, such as a GPS/PDA or perhaps some follow on to the video iPod. These are cases where usage makes a phone form factor less attractive. The second possibility is that a truly superior PDA may appear and revitalize the market, although this is a long shot. What I think we've learned by watching the music player market is that design and connectivity matter. Sure lots of people bought MP3 players before the iPod, but the iPod actually drove the expansion of the market, rather than cannibalizing it. It's not impossible to imagine a video iPod/PDA becoming a must-have item.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    1. Re:I don't think so. by PrescriptionWarning · · Score: 0

      although Palm never had quite the impact of the iPod on the masses, I do believe that once upon a time when they were originally introduced they were a fairly must have item, since cells didn't do much more than make phone calls and laptops were still fairly heavy. there's going to have to be some large steps forward in the PDA market, much like your iPod analogy, to get it really out there. and not only will its features and actual functionality be important, but also its baseline price. too expensive, and it will never catch on.

    2. Re:I don't think so. by hey! · · Score: 1

      Apple has always done this better than anyone, and even in the dark pre Jobs parousia years.

      The essence of the iPod strategy AFAIK is this:

      (1) Create a highly desirable product
      (2) Price it high enough to be a luxury, but low enough indulgent people will treat themselves
      (3) Chiivy the customers onto the upgrade treadmill.

      Of course there's the music store. This is a master stroke; it increases the perceived value of the device while offsetting its costs. I'm not sure whether that is graftable onto a PDA strategy, unless the PDA strategy is grafted onto it.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    3. Re:I don't think so. by powerlord · · Score: 2, Interesting
      or perhaps some follow on to the video iPod.


      I remember the rumors recently that the current "iPod Video" is not what Apple really had in mind for the iPod video and that the next generation would have a screen the size of the device, and move the controls to a touch sensitive screen.

      If this is true (and I think it likely), then it would also be a perfect opportunity for Apple to upgrade the PDA functions already in the iPod by including better text entry (a soft keyboard, and/or a stylus of some sort?). These small changes could easily turn the iPod into a converged device that would kill 90% of the market for traditional PDAs.

      I think most people prefer the idea of keeping their PDA and telephone seperate, mostly due to battery life concerns. On the other hand, since you already connect an iPod regularly to a computer to load up new music, recharge it, etc., it is already being treated as it would need to be to handle most PDA functions. Irronically an iPod/PDA wouldn't have a replacable battery (assuming the follow the previous designs), while a Cell phone would, but one advantage of an iPod/PDA over most PDAs is the large non-volatile storage capacity. With most PDAs, when you run out of power, you data is lost. With an iPod/PDA, running out of power means you ran out of power :) Find an outlet/usb port/firewire port, and your device can be recharged and you can again access your data without having to reload it from a PC. Heck, I've even seen emergency chargers for sale in airports that use the dock connector and a one-time battery to deliver 10 hours of extra life to an iPod (or so they claimed), or the Belkin attachment that runs it using batteries.

      Granted, one of the things people like about PDAs is the "add-on" software they put on it, but, after owning various PDAs (mostly Palm), for the past 10 years, I find that the only programs I really use are the Memo, Addressbook, Clock, Calculator, and one "custom app" (eBook Reader). Quite bluntly, I would be surprised if apple didn't offer support for all of those things. In fact, if they had everything BUT the eBook reader, I would still dump my aging PDA (a Sony Clie that I love), in favor of a new iPod. I can read the eBooks on my laptop if I really want.

      If Apple is smart they could use the iPod popularity to re-enter the PDA market (everyone remember the Newton? :) ), and use that to further entice people to start using their OS X platform.
      --
      This space for rent. All reasonable inquiries will be entertained at proprietors discretion.
    4. Re:I don't think so. by SStrungis · · Score: 1
      iPods already have PIM functionailty...It's just not realtime. You have to enter everything on your desktop software and then sync with the iPod.

      Besides, most folks don't even realize that the iPod is also an external HD. As far as they are concerned, the music (and now video) is the limit of its functionality. iTunes works like magic. You don't need to know any geekery pokery to get your music in.

      As far as the Newt is concerned...That will never come back on its own. I still use my 2100 every day for book reading, quick note taking (please, no eat up martha jokes), and phone numbers. If it fit my pockets, I would still use it everyday.

      I went to a Psion for a couple of months and loved it...Then one of the hinges started to go. Bye Bye Psion.

      Now I use a Zaurus SLC1000. It's a clamshell with a keyboard and a bright tappable 640x480 screen. It's small, but razor sharp. It takes SD, CF, and Microdrives for storage plus has a fair bit of built in storage space. Heck, I went through this whole thread and no one's mentioned the Zaurus at all. I read, note, calendar, video, music, and game on it. I use it every day. Best $300 I every spent on a PDA....I've tried lots!

      Newt 130-sold it to get Visor
      Handspring Visor Deluxe-two cracked screens and that was that
      Palm m505-sold due to lack of use (nicest looking of all palms)
      Newt 2100-still use all the time, even on the www and get mail.
      Handspring Visor Edge-sold due to lack of use, loved the size.
      Psion 5mx-still works, one failing hinge
      Zaurus sl5500-took the cheaper $100 plunge to see if I liked...hated the thumboard. Sold it.
      Zaurus slc1000-Love it, love it. Daily driver. Want to get Newt emulator running on it.

    5. Re:I don't think so. by RexxFiend · · Score: 1

      like one of these
      Having permanent storage for a pda by sticking a hdd on the back sounds like a great idea but the problem is that if you want the device to have any battery life at all then you need to power down the hdd. This means that you get terrible lag every time the device powers up the hdd to access your data.
      It's easier for ipods and the like cos you can predict what data is going to be required (the next track in the playlist is usually a safe bet) and pull the data into a local cache well in advance. That's harder to do on a pda as the data access pattern is largely random.
      The lifedrive is a lovely looking device tho, and you can get caching software such as sharkcache which improves it greatly. But then you are back to the start as your data isn't on the hdd any more.
      bummer.

      --

      A crash reduces
      Your expensive computer
      to a simple stone.
  33. storage + interface = endgame by Thecarpe · · Score: 1

    PDA's lack storage, but provide an excellent interface.

    Tablets don't have the smaller portability.

    I think the future looks like smaller HDD players or flash drives with an OS but NO DISPLAY and a video out (bluetooth or hardline). Hook it up to your car, your computer, the screen on your phone, your home theater...whatever.

    The common denominator is not the interface, it's the data.

    1. Re:storage + interface = endgame by belroth · · Score: 1
      PDA's lack storage, but provide an excellent interface.
      My old ipaq 5550 has 128Mb ram internally and I have a 1Gb SD card in the slot (and a few more full of mp3 to listen to).

      Like some other people have mentioned I don't want convergence. I had a SE P800 but the screen was too small for real use after the novelty wore off so I bought the iPaq. When the screen broke on the P800 I got a RAZR (with a bluetooth headset).

      I make calls on the RAZR, I don't use the calendar and the UI sucks compared to the SE but the size of the thing is perfect, there's no reason not to carry it from a convenience pov. The headset is useful with the iPaq too - especially when using bluetooth sat nav.

      I have calligrapher on the iPaq and it's much, much, better graffiti was on my old palm - I couldn't contemplate going back to that! I use the iPaq for contacts, calendar, sat nav, mp3, ebooks, tons of html manuals and docs, games... you get the idea. And when I take my son to the beach or woods I leave the pda alone and only need the cellphone.

      This is one area where I don't need or want convergence - like hi fi and tv/dvd etc. I like it modular to allow for convenience of repair and/or upgrade.

      Oh, and you can get 4Gb sd cards now... but a bluetooth enabled portable hdd sounds cool.

      --
      I hereby inform you that I have NOT been required to provide any decryption keys.
  34. Re:Depends on how you look at what constitutes a P by Kithraya · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm right there with you. I've got a high-end Palm and an mid-range Axim. I've tried unsuccessfully to use both to get myself organized. My cell phone holds all the contact information I need on a daily basis. Since entering anything in an electronic calendar that requires handwring recognition (or numerous taps on a virtual keyboard) is slow, the only entries in my calendar were recurring things I remembered anyway (weekly team meetings, martial arts class schedule, etc). The important stuff to jot down (oil change on Thursday, doctor on Tuesday) never got written down, so I was always forgetting. I tried to use it as an electronic shopping list, and failed. In the end, my Axim became a way to play games in boring meetings.

    Then I moved to some $0.25 mini spiral-bound notebooks from Staples with a bullet-type space pen. It's tiny and light-weight, so it's always with me. Lists get written down immediately. When I'm done shopping, that page is torn out and thrown away. An upcoming schedule page at the front keeps me organized, as does a simple to-do list. When pages fill up or are no longer needed, they're torn out and tossed. When the notebook is empty, I spent another $0.25 to replace it. It's going to take me a long time to reach the level of electronic PDA cost with this system, and I've never been more organized.

  35. Pen based by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

    I think pen based for pointing is a good thing. However, I find that entering text via the pen never worked very well. It was slower than typing on the mini keyboards, didn't feel natural, so you're writing was messsy, and if you weren't sitting still (on a bus,in a car), then it was even worse.

    --

    Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
  36. I'm with you by slapout · · Score: 1

    I want my PDA and phone to be seperate. The phone should handle communications duties. And they should talk to each other wirelessly (bluetooth).

    --
    Coder's Stone: The programming language quick ref for iPad
  37. All thumbs! by RingDev · · Score: 1

    I recently had an oppertunity to develop a .Net app for a Pocket PC. One of my primary design and layout considerations was to make the buttons thumbable. With larger buttons and small dead space between them, you lose a lot of screen space, but the app can then be used with out a stylus making it significantly easier to get around in.

    -Rick

    --
    "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
  38. I love my PDA by Lanhdanan · · Score: 2, Informative

    Been using a PDA for years. Read books, play games, keeps photos, my emails, phone numbers, personal notes, date reminders ... It is a part of my life really. Use it everyday. One thing it doesnt need it a damn phone. Im already around too many phones (most times i dont even bother answering my phone @ home. more bother than what it is worth.)

    I will be upgrading when im inclined (to a model around $500-$600 CAD), and i guess with HP going out, that is one less model i need to be concerned with researching when i do decide to purchase. I highly recommend a PDA to anyone who enjoys any of what i mentioned above, cept for the phone thing, if you *must* have a phone, then you will have to sacrifice some things in the name of communication.

  39. PDA not dead by kahrytan · · Score: 1


    PDAs won't die, they just need to be reinvented. Anyone got an ideas?

    --
    \
    1. Re:PDA not dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, Apple. if Apple resurrects the Newton, the PDA market will flourish.

    2. Re:PDA not dead by biglig2 · · Score: 1

      Flexible LCD screens.

      The technology is nearly there... Consider a device the size of a first generation ipod. OK, not as tiny as a nano but still a tiny device you can carry about without problems. Now imagine that you can open it like a book and have a flexible screen that covers the hinge. You'd easily get around a 5.5" diagonal screen, which would easily do 800x600 resolution. I can remember when my laptop did that resolution - heck, I have users today who still run their screens in that res, even on a 17" flat panel!

      --
      ~~~~~ BigLig2? You mean there's another one of me?
    3. Re:PDA not dead by kahrytan · · Score: 1

      Exactly what I was thinking. Flexible Organic LCD screens that can roll up into small hand-held device and are voice activated. Organic LCDs is an emerging technology. And such a device would require voice activation to keep it's size down.

        It is also in tv shows and movies.

      --
      \
    4. Re:PDA not dead by biglig2 · · Score: 1

      I am thinking book style rather than rolling up, because you need the device to be easy to hold when open.

      Next after this is a HUD built into a pair of glasses, with a BT link to the machine. That's a little further in the future, I think, but is the best solution. The display then become snot only larger, but can be more useful because it can overlay on your existing vision.

      This is doable now, but not small enough yet, especially since you'd need earphones, a microphone, and a camera in the same unit. Power will also be a problem, a cable to the CPU will be clunky, although v1 will no doubt have this.

      One nice feature of this is that it allows the processing unit to be bigger. I could clip e.g. three ipods to the back of my belt without discomfort.

      Now, leaving hardware aside for the moment, let's address the next aspect of this device - it must run a "real" OS. To be more accurate, it must run real PC applications.

      Let me explain. Who makes the perfect PDA? Well, no-one, but there is a company that makes a PDA that is almost perfect - just one feature missing. That company is Apple, and the product is the 12" ibook, and the missing feature is that you can't put it in your pocket. If you are the sort of person who carrys a shoulder bag with you all the time, the powerbook is the perfect PDA, as otehr slashdot users will attest. The key here, is that it runs all the software a real PC does. Now, on my smartphone there is a web browser, and a spreadsheet, and a word processor, and a PIM, and they're all OK, but I already have the browser and PIM and so on I want, and they're on my PC. I want those same programs on my PDA.

      Heres my last observation, we will see these things very soon. There's an interview with Warren Ellis (http://www.warrenellis.com/) I read a while back about when he was making the Global Frequency TV pilot.

      At this point you should really go away and get copies of the Global Frequency books,but in case you don't, I'll explain that in the books the main characters use highly sophisticated smartphones to communicate.

      A year or two later they make the TV show, and they had to rethink the capabilites of these smartphones because you could buy something about as powerful as the book version in any high street.

      --
      ~~~~~ BigLig2? You mean there's another one of me?
  40. Why? by DogDude · · Score: 1

    Why do you care if nobody is making PDA's any more? You have one, already. How many more do you need? Will yours stop working if companies stop making them?

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
    1. Re:Why? by Daniel_Staal · · Score: 1

      In short: Yes.

      At the very least, the built-in recargable battery has a limited life. I've had one PDA die that way so far. Another fell in a lake with me. Another had a hinge wear out. (Sony flip Clie: the hinge wore out and the screen stopped working.)

      And of course there is the whole thing about being able to sync to my computer, which means software updates as my OS updates.

      PDA's wear out, and need replacement, even if you don't need/want new features.

      --
      'Sensible' is a curse word.
    2. Re:Why? by __aajqwr7439 · · Score: 1

      I was very happy with Sony Clies, and the company stopped making them. (Why do they insist on killing their best tech?) Then I dropped mine. I happened to have a plan that had it replaced, but I decided to upgrade. To get another Clie, I spent an insane week on eBay trying to get an NX80v. It's almost 3 years old, but nothing on the market has all its features. After seeing several go for over $300, I settled on a new Palm T|X for $250. Similar specs to the NX80, but no camera, and I constantly used the camera in my Clie TJ27. Also no keyboard.

      A bigger concern is that if they stop making Palm devices altogether, we're stuck with Windows.

  41. And HP helped kill it. by argent · · Score: 1

    When HP bought Compaq, they had just come out with a refresh for the Hp Jornada Pocket PC that made it one of the best devices out. While the Rube-Goldberg iPaq had a larger market share by dint of being the first device out using the ARM processor that became the standard with Pocket PC 2002, it was ungainly to actually use... you pretty much had to add a sleeve AND a protective case, making the resulting device too large to conveniantly carry in your pocket, the Jornada 568 with its hard shell and built-in CF slot was only a little bit larger than the "naked" iPaq, but it was complete and self-contained... and the electronics were virtualy identical.

    So what did HP do? It killed the Jornada and came out with a stripped down non-expandible baby iPaq for the "Jornada Fans". Me, I took this as an opportunity to go back to PalmOS.

    There's plenty of OTHER blame to go around: Microsoft, Palm, Sony, Jaff Hawkins and Handspring's ADD-fueled product-line shuffling. But HP sure owns a fair slice of the blame.

  42. Seems like only yesterday ... by Jerry · · Score: 1

    Pen based PDAs were being hailed as the latest and greatest.

    I wonder how many people blew their $$$ chasing that fad?

    --

    Running with Linux for over 20 years!

  43. Nokia 770 by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 1

    I hate to tell HP this, but the touch-screen pocket-sized computer will always be with us, as long as hand sizes remain the same, and as long as pockets still exist. Maybe we won't call them a PDA. Maybe we'll call them an Internet Tablet?

    --
    Don't piss off The Angry Economist
    1. Re:Nokia 770 by nasch · · Score: 1

      Nobody's arguing with that; HP is claiming that soon they will all have phones included.

  44. Re:They haven't caught on because the interface su by pruss · · Score: 1

    There are some pretty fast alternative on-screen input methods. See, for instance:

    http://www.almaden.ibm.com/u/zhai/papers/IwCvol16Z haiAccepted.pdf [PDF]

    http://www.almaden.ibm.com/u/zhai/papers/Kristenss onZhai2004.pdf [PDF]

  45. Won't SOMEBODY give the market what it wants? by keraneuology · · Score: 1
    I want a razr. I spend lots of time visiting government buildings and I used to spend lots of time visiting engineering and manufacturing facilities. Cameras are not allowed which means that if my cell has a camera, I can't keep my cell.

    I also want bluetooth.

    I call Verizon - "can I have a bluetooth phone without a camera?" "No - the cell phone people won't provide them, but we have lots of engineers and lots of lawyers who want one". I call Motorola - "can I have a bluetooth phone without a camera?" "No - we don't sell those." "Why not?" "I don't know"

    So I don't buy a new phone.

    Motorola, LG, and anybody else out there, behold! I have money! I will give you money if you provide a cell phone I want! Money that can be used to buy hookers for the senators in washington who will give you special tax breaks! Money to buy hookers for yourselves. Money to tip the little people who wash your car. I want to give you money, but you don't want to give me what I, and hundreds of thousands - if not millions - of other people want!

    Directly related to this thread. People don't WANT a smartphone. They want a phone and a PDA. Maybe Paris Hilton wants a smart phone so she can leak her contact list out and make the news while all of her friends have to change their numbers wants a smartphone, and maybe the Paris Hilton wannabes want one, but you will sell a phones AND PDAs if you provide them to people like us.

    MONEY! Money that wants to be in your bank accounts, paying for your hookers! We are the market. We have the money. Give us what we want and we'll give you what you want. This is how it works.

    --
    If the g'vt kept the data on you that google does you'd better believe you'd be calling it "doing evil"
    1. Re:Won't SOMEBODY give the market what it wants? by bloobloo · · Score: 1

      Nokia 6021 - a couple of years old now, but has Bluetooth & no camera.

    2. Re:Won't SOMEBODY give the market what it wants? by PeterChenoweth · · Score: 1

      Get a Blackberry. My 7100t has bluetooth (for headset usage, doesn't have OBEX or modem profiles) and no camera. I'm pretty sure that every current Blackberry has bluetooth, and I'm positive that no Blackberries have cameras.

    3. Re:Won't SOMEBODY give the market what it wants? by biglig2 · · Score: 1

      Siemens SP65. It's a Siemens S65 handset with the camera removed for people just like you. (It also has Bluetooth.)

      --
      ~~~~~ BigLig2? You mean there's another one of me?
    4. Re:Won't SOMEBODY give the market what it wants? by keraneuology · · Score: 1

      A Siemens and a Nokia. Can they both be unlocked for use with Verizon?

      --
      If the g'vt kept the data on you that google does you'd better believe you'd be calling it "doing evil"
    5. Re:Won't SOMEBODY give the market what it wants? by blitziod · · Score: 1

      i want a blue tooth phone with no color screen and ULTRA small. That way i can use my bluetooth pda and bt camera when i need them and not waste $$ and battery power( and size) on duplicate funtions. I can use my BT head set when i want to talk, my big screen on my bt pda( tungsten t2) when i want to use the web or take notes, check email, etc and a camera when i want to take pics. Then all will be good.

      --
      The only way to bust a doper--is when you yourself become a smoker!
  46. Re:Depends on how you look at what constitutes a P by danheretic · · Score: 1

    In all seriousness, the "analog" solution you mention is much more versatile than any PDA.

    For years I've been using a simple pen and mini paper notebook in the back pocket. (Not front pocket protector, I'm not an Engineer.) Lately I've been using the PocketMod. It's extremely useful and versatile, but does require frequent "recharging".

  47. Herded like sheep by dnoyeb · · Score: 1

    Its not so much that Palm offers Smart phones. Its that Palm does not push back against the idea of PDA being a phone accessory as opposed to a phone being a PDA accessory. Its not in their interest to be second fiddle, but they dont seem to get it.

    I went from Palm to Treo to BlackBerry. Which is from Stylus for everything to Stylus for selection and keyb for rest, to keyboard and thumbwheel. Each was a step down in user interaction. A smart phone would be yet another step down. Palm leadership is incompetent.

    1. Re:Herded like sheep by langelgjm · · Score: 1

      For me, the phone is the PDA accessory. I bought a Fujitsu Loox 720, and highly recommend it to anyone looking for a high-end PDA. It's not sold in the US, so I had to order it from Britain, but it was well worth it.

      I can't imagine a smartphone capable of doing what this thing can do - CF and SD slots, a VGA screen (which makes huge difference for my eyes- I use a lot of dictionaries on this device). Not to mention the fact that I can Remote Desktop fairly easily into my home computer. I laugh when I think about the video iPod - I can stream video wirelessly on my 4" screen. And USB host capability - which means plugging in external hard drives. Maybe I'd consider a smart phone, when it could do all that.

      But then again, no. Because the damn thing was so expensive, I only take it with me to class and such. On the other hand, I'm no so paranoid about my Nokia 6230 being broken/lost/stolen.

      --
      "Anyone who [rips a CD] is probably engaging in copyright infringement." - David O. Carson
  48. Word for Windows for Workgroups for Pen Computing by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    If only pen-PDAs had introduced a new "pen paradigm" to replace (or at least augment) the keyboard and mouse paradigms in their UI. But they aren't even as graphical as the current creaky old paradigm (dating from the beginning of the epoch). They're more textual. They don't do text recognition, either per-letter or per-word/-phrase, as accurately as typing. And worse, correcting mistakes takes longer and is much more distracting than with typing.

    Penpads have the opportunity to make most interfaces to info symbolic. Well beyond the mere icons and overloaded (and dumb as a stick) windows we're used to. Feedback between the pen and the graphics could be much more tightly coupled than through the larger circuit of deskbound keys/mouse and distant text/icons/buttons. That feedback needs to leverage much more informative "display transformations", showing state not only of the info directly controlled, but immediate effects on related info, whether found, input, read, weighted, written or sent. Iconic gestures with with smart widgets, retrieving each other in context collections, "smart hiding" unused onscreen GUIs, on-the-fly dataflow and flowchart control diagrams. And the maximum integration of all data, segregated only within modal datatype boundaries, with maximum symmetry in interfaces and interconnectivity. "Applications" would disappear in favor of default-networked dataflow, with every immediate context offering every legal operation, at most two gestures away. "Saving" data goes away, with just un/do WYSIWYG visualization of versioned transactions stored in relations. Local storage as cache only, synced to distributed network "backups". All because the pen is more expressive, but less precise.

    All those features will come. We'll reiterate the evolution in large tablets first. Which will immediately start shrinking, as always with personal electronics. But we had our chance to get it right the first time, in 1996-2006 (the "Pilot Era"), if only SW architects had shown as much imagination as the HW architects and engineers put out. But at least this time around we'll have plenty of mistakes to learn from.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  49. Something, just evolved by ursabear · · Score: 1

    I don't think the PDA pen-small-computing thing will evaporate at all. It will just evolve into something else that remains useful. Be they watches, phones, wallets, traditional PDA palmtops, something-not-yet-thought-of, etc., the PDA will stick with us for a long time.

    On another note, I've always enjoyed messing with HP stuff - it's generally interesting and sometimes even esoteric... BUT... If I were trying to get my product into the world's consciousness, I wouldn't name it iPaq xr4900Bni6lQwlTurbo2.0qnPDA (or even the shorter version in TFA). Easy-to-remember names are much better than alphabet soup.


    Sometimes I miss having my Newton 100 around...

    1. Re:Something, just evolved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree

  50. Size by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Tablets dont fit in your pocket. So they are not a replacment for a PDA.

    Nothing wrong with a tablet, just that they are not a 'pda killer'. ( though they might eventually start chewing at the laptop market ).

    Fancy cell phones are more of a threat to the PDA market.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:Size by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Tablet PC are M$ market and are only designed to replace clip boards. Keyboards as required for uniform fast input, to deny that is to deny the existence of typewriters. Smart cell phones vs PDA's with cell phone capability, how can they compete when they are the same thing, just the marketing hype differs i.e. they are both the same thing, small hand held devices that will fit into a pocket, provide communications capabilities and provide a computing bridge for larger not as transportable but more functional devices. Plus of course their greatly extended remote control capabilities, from TVs to garage doors.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  51. On the subject of an alalog PDA... by 1.21GW · · Score: 0

    ...this is my favorite. Check it out. http://www.pocketmod.com/

  52. Data input was easy on the Newton by MCRocker · · Score: 1
    they're *useless* for any serious amount of data input


    That's the Palm legacy for you. Palm kicked Newton ass partly because they used a 'good enough' handwriting technology that resulted in a MUCH cheaper device because it didn't require the massive computing power that Rosetta did. While this was appropriate at the time it's now a legacy anchor holding back a major portion of the PDA marketplace.

    Yes, there are better handwriting recognition engines on some PDA's, but those devices tend to be coupled with crippled user interfaces that make the improved HWR of only marginal benefit. The Newton wasn't perfect by a long shot, but it was designed from the ground up to work well with pen input and did a much better job than most modern PDA's.

    have you ever tried writing a letter on one?


    Yes. My Newton worked great for this. It was a fantastic, data input device that was entirely suitable for high volume data input and even had some decent graphical input capabilities. Once I attended a lecture where, instead of just writing down the key points, I wrote down virtually every word... in a 90 minute lecture! Admittedly, this won't work well in a physics class and the speaker, in this case, was a dramatic speaker who paused for emphasis frequently. However, sitting in a meeting and taking notes with a laptop is disruptive, but scribbling notes on a Newton isn't any more disruptive than writing on a pad of paper... unless your alarm goes off ;)

    Another key factor, that is common to all PDA's, is that mobility means you can easily take the device to the source of your data. Once I drew a picture of a sidewalk wedge that needed to be replaced and added the dimmensions to the picture as I measured them. Then it was an easy matter to fax a quick note, complete with a dimmensioned diagram to the contractor to do the work.
    --
    Signatures are a waste of bandwi (buffering...)
  53. Re:Depends on how you look at what constitutes a P by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thanks for the link.
    Possibly the most useful thing I've ever seen on the internet. :)

  54. Not first, best is arguable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ever heard of the Newton?
    Palm?

  55. Well this sucks by Daetrin · · Score: 1
    I'll tell you why not. I'm currently busy trying to find a cellphone/PDA combo that _doesn't_ have a keyboard. I want a PDA that i can use for just one thing, taking notes. Being able to import and read text files from other sources would be good to. I was a little worried about having to learn that special handwriting stroke thing, but then a friend of mine showed me her PDA, which had the option to bring up a virtual keyboard that you could type on using the stylus, which is good enough for me.

    So why avoid the more high-tech keyboard type PDA/cellphones? Because they have a ton of functionality i don't need, and every time you add functionality you're sacrificing something else, usually price. Adding those stupid little keyboards is certainly increasing the price, increasing the size of the device, and often decreasing the screen size. The email and web functionality and all the other PC like aspects are certainly included in the cost as well. As a result in order to get the functionality i want it looks like i'd need to get a $500 or so cellphone when it could really be accomplished in the standard $200 cellphones. (Especially if they got rid of the stupid camera functionality, which i don't really want either.)

    So that's why i'd really prefer an old fashioned, simple stylus style PDA. Because i don't want to pay extra, in both money and device real-estate, for functionality i don't really need.

    --
    This Space Intentionally Left Blank
  56. It's Now Official...The Newton is DEAD! by kcwookie · · Score: 1

    Apple is not going to enter the PDA market, just like Steve said!

  57. Re:Depends on how you look at what constitutes a P by gamigad · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Amazing, I've just been through the same kind of epiphany. I've got my iBook and Treo with me constantly, but a couple of weeks ago found myself floundering with my todo's and whatnot. While syncing is no problem, I really didn't feel I had a Birds Eye View. Since I'm a project manager basically hired out to customers, I have an extremely heterogenous workload. Like many, I went the GTD -> 43Folders (link in parent post) -> Hipster PDA (3x5 index cards).

    I liked the templates I found referenced at 43Folders, especially those at DIYPlanner http://www.diyplanner.com/. BUT, I've whittled it down to a week template, and a blank template that covers everything else.

    The result? Pure goodness! An empty inbox, a few contexts, preemptive rather than reactive management. And all in two weeks. For the first time in a long time I'm facing a weekend without catchup work.

    I love my Treo, but it has been completely displaced by pen and paper + Mail.app + iCal.

    Simplicity rules.

  58. PDA is not a watered-down laptop. by MS-06FZ · · Score: 1

    Most people NEVER needed a PDA anyway - a calendar and addressbook in a mobile is enough for most people.

    Plus many modern PDAs cost almost as much as a small / low budget laptop. Why bother buying an expensive gizmo if you can (get) the real thing for a bit more?


    A laptop is not "better" than a PDA. More precisely, it does not replace a PDA any more than a PDA replaces a laptop. I can have my PDA with me any time, jot down something that's on my mind, and it's stored. It's quick and simple.

    A small enough laptop with tablet functionality or a micro-keyboard could provide that functionality, but when you put a full PC in a package that small it starts to not be so useful for the things you would want a full PC for. And for that kind of usage scenario (always around, use when I need it, quickly, and usually briefly, possibly in less than optimal conditions) software written for a PC isn't too suitable anyway. For a portable device you need software designed for a small (physically and in terms of resolution) screen. For a mobile device you need software that's well suited to that usage scenario, minimal effort required to perform the most common actions.

    Mobile phones are bound to take over PDA stuff, of course - as time goes on we'll eventually reach the point where the mobile phone as a whole (subscription and all) is cheap enough and small enough and efficient enough that it simply wouldn't be worth not including one in a smart device (meaning, if you had a PDA-ish thing, it having wireless connectivity and a data plan would be a given. And if you have the connectivity and data plan, adding a mic and speaker is trivial...) - and in the mean time, for all those people who want a phone, creating smart phones is the best way to sell them digital organizer functions which they either don't need, or don't know they need.

    --
    ---GEC
    I'm but the humble pupil, seeking to snatch the scratchbuilt pebble from the master's fully articulated hand
  59. You've got this all wrong. by fireboy1919 · · Score: 1

    I want to be able to do a little organizing on my MP3 player and phone and listen to mp3s on my phone and PDA, and be able to share any kind of anything between them.

    I want everything to be able to do everything, but each should also do one thing well.

    That way, if one of them breaks, I can use the other one...kinda.

    My PDA is my bookreader, and my phone is my mp3 player but in a pinch either will do the other thing. It's just that the phone has an understandably small screen, and the PDA has an understandably bad set of speakers.

    Stop thinking about getting screwed three times over. Start thinking about how easy it is for manufacturers to add certain additional limited functionality for almost no cost for certain devices.

    --
    Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
  60. Stylus is dead... by PhYrE2k2 · · Score: 1

    The pen, a lovely analog device, is horribly inacurate, requires calibration, and requires two hands. That was one thing when Palm was competing with writing in a notebook and wanted things familar, but in this day and world where people love the mouse and a few buttons, the pen is just a hassle. The ability to do anything on a BlackBerry with just one hand makes it rather ideal for many cases (this being calendaring and looking up addresses, entry of course is another story), not to mention having a keyboard (newer Palms of course do).

    It's just sloppy to use the stylus, and requires too much attention from whatever else it is that you're doing (driving, on the can, etc).

    Tablets haven't taken on because they're about 15" diag because of the screen, about 1" thick, have a turning radius for converting it to a tablet/pc in some cases where they convert, create heat, noise, and suck back power in a matter of a few hours.

    They're very capable for situations where they are needed (I most often see them in doctors offices to bring a patient a diagram 3D model of a proceedure), but when they're too big and too incapable of doing what a handheld needs to do.

    That's like me getting a portable TV for the car and you carrying around a 13" CRT television and a power inverter... I'd imagine mine will be much more useful.

    -M

    --

    when you see the word 'Linux', drink!
  61. Keyboards MIGHT be a problem by hey! · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The interesting question is this: what is the difference between what people want and what people need.

    Answer this wrong, and you fail to get the customer on the all important upgrade treadmill.

    Keyboards are a trade off. What you give up is the ratio of PDA size to screen. A PDA that is smaller is better. A PDA with a bigger screen is better. It therefore follows that the ideal PDA is all screen, and a keyboard PDA will never be ideal.

    On the other hand, a keyboarded PDA has the following advantage: it's easy to learn. A few minutes in the store, and you're as good as you're ever going to be on the thing. And therein lies the problem: is that good enough? Having used both keyboard-less and keyboarded PDAs, I'd say that for the answer is no. I'm not saying that's true for everyone, but it is certainly true for many. I'd be interested to know if many people who got used to Graffitti in the Palm days actually prefer the keyboard after a few months. I'm sure some do, but most people I know who were palm enthusiasts don't.

    I think the problem is this: people don't go into a store to buy a keyboarded PDA. They go in to buy a PDA, then choose keyboarded ones over keyboardless ones because they are beginner friendly. However, this doesn't mean that they're necessarily happier after eighteen months than if they'd gone without a keyboard. If the keyboard is a limiting factor in their PDA experience, those people will probably go converged, accepting an even more limited keyboard because they don't perceive the PDA functions as having much value. They might forgo PDA functions altogether.

    What I'm trying to say is just because a feature is popular it doesn't automatically follow that it's good for the market.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    1. Re:Keyboards MIGHT be a problem by multipartmixed · · Score: 1

      As someone who has used all his Palms (m105, Treo600, Treo650) nearly exclusively for telnet/ssh/serial -- I would have to say that the keyboard is a freakin' GODSEND.

      I could never remember the graffitos for |, !, >, >>, ", ', `, etc... the keyboard makes most of them easily available, and when they're not, I just grab the stylus [which I keep in my mouth] and hit the right character on the virtual keyboard (which I have *just* made appear with my other keyboarded hand, while the first was reaching for the stylus)

      --

      Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
  62. Which product is "on it's death bed?" by Phat_Tony · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I sort of agree with what the article's saying; that the stand-alone PDA's days are numbered. (pun intended).

    But when devices converge, and you get one thing that is a cell phone, and a camera, and an MP3 player, and a GPS/mapping/directions device, and it manages and hotsyncs your email and address book and lets you edit them, then how can you really say which category of device "won" and which ones "died?" Is it based on the existence of a pen for input that truly defines the PDA? Is it based on whether you end up buying the device at an office supply store or a cell-phone store? Is it based on which predecessor device the new device looks the most like?

    I don't think PDA functionality is going away, it's either being subsumed or else subsuming the functions of other devices. I think that when functionality is integrated, arguing over which previously separate set of functionality "won" and which "died" is just pointless semantic quibbling.

    --
    Can anyone tell me how to set my sig on Slashdot?
  63. An Itanic Response by AtariDatacenter · · Score: 1

    This thread couldn't go much further with at least a mention of HP's Itanium and predictions there. "RISC IS DEAD!" They threw away their own chips in order to go with a combined product. What a colossal failure that was. HP's former CEO was very big on 'the future'. Carly's and HP's great fault is that they gave vision more weight than reality.

  64. New Federal Mental Health Initiative by Embedded+Geek · · Score: 1
    if you gave one of these things to one of the homeless guys who stand on the street and talk to unseen people, they would cease to look crazy

    Washington, D.C. - Today the Bush administration announced the first major increase in public spending for the mentally ill since Ronald Reagan slashed psychiatric care for indigents in the 1980s. Under the new program, Medicare will be expanded such that every American who is diagnosed with schizophrenia will be issued with a Bluetooth headset to allow them to speak to the voices in their heads more efficiently. In a surprising move, the Administration has budgetted $100.00 for each of the 298 million U.S. residents, regardless of citizenship status.

    In a related story, Halliburton (symobl:HAL) has announced that it will be making unsolicited takeover bids for Motorola (MOT) and Jabra, major players in the Bluetooth handset field.

    --

    "Prepare for the worst - hope for the best."

  65. Re:Depends on how you look at what constitutes a P by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    More versatile? Sure, if you need some paper mache, or want to fold up an airplane and throw it at someone, or an emergency rolling paper. But the PDA has a zillion uses too. You could use it to crush a [small] nut for example...

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  66. Cell Phones on Death Bed :) by artsrc · · Score: 1

    I am dropping my cell phone as soon as WiFi blankets my city, San Francisco. I prefer IM to text messaging, and I want video as well as audio on my calls. ArtSrc

  67. about damn time by option8 · · Score: 2

    about damn time. my newton is starting to show its age. now the industry can move on to something *new* and finally come up with a replacement for it.

  68. Most people by Expert+Determination · · Score: 1
    Most people don't need an SUV. But plenty of people buy them. Most people don't need luxury cars. But there are plenty of luxury cars on the road. Most people don't need a supercomputer at home, and yet plenty of homes have >2GHz Pcs with >1GB of ram. Most people don't need hundreds of channels of entertainment, and yet they pay for digital cable.

    What does "most people" have to do with anything?

    --
    "The White House is not an intelligence-gathering agency," -- Scott McClellan, Whitehouse spokesman.
  69. Long live Palm Pilots! by wwphx · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Agreed. Three days ago I got fed up with the failing handwriting recognition of my old Palm Vx, Wednesday I bought a brand-new T|X (I was going to buy it with this year's tax refund but I was pushed beyond the point of endurance).

    I want something that I can put in my pant's pocket. With long battery life. With a good display. That doesn't crash.

    I don't want something with a cell phone, it will violate the size issue and also gives me a single point of failure depriving me of two devices if one fails or the unit is lost. I don't want an MP3 player in it, the fidelity will suck and it will suck more memory that I don't want to give over to it. I don't want Bluetooth, I don't want WiFi (it can't get onto my home network because of my security restrictions). I definitely don't want a digital camera as I'd like to do some DoD consulting at some point.

    And I don't want something from HP/Compaq: two B companies that merged to form a bigger B company (except their servers, I like Compaq servers).

    Sorry, I've been using Palm Pilots for over a decade and will not give it up until they pry my cold dead fingers from around it.

    --
    When you sympathize with stupidity, you start thinking like an idiot.
    1. Re:Long live Palm Pilots! by mysticgoat · · Score: 1

      I've just replaced my much valued and often abused Palm Vx with a Palm Z22. The Vx continues to work but the screen has become too dim for me to read well. The Palm Z22 is in some ways a step down but it has all the features I need, and adequate space. Plus its cost is low enough that I'm willing to use it without protection. I really got to hate the Palm Vx clamshell.

      I've used Palms since 1995 as address books, portable procedure manuals (the memos are excellent for that) and some reference works. I've just loaded the _Perl Desktop Reference_ and _PHP Manual_ on the Z22 but I haven't really tested their usefulness as yet.

      I can't see how a combined cell phone and PDA would be useful to me. Too often I'm using the PDA to look up something while I'm on the phone-- I don't know how I could do that with a combination unit.

    2. Re:Long live Palm Pilots! by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      I bought a new Palm 'Tungsten' device about a year ago. It lasted just beyond the warranty period of 6 months. It really, really sucked having to make sure I charged it at least daily. I've switched back to the Palm III. I own one that gets heavy use, and have bought several more that are almost brand new on eBay for under $20 each (the second one was under $10 including shipping).

      They get hundreds of hours of battery life. Weeks and Months of battery life with heavy daily use.

      The new Palm stuff is junk by comparison to a Palm III, so long as what you're aiming for is regular old PDA functionality.

      A unit integrated with a cellphone is a non-starter for me, a complete non-starter. Did I mention I like the Palm III because it consumes two AAA batterys ever few months? Yep. I'm a cheap kinda guy. And nobody pays me enough money to motivate me to carry a fricking cellphone. I don't know that anybody _could_ pay me enough.

      And I have CodeWarrior for PalmOS 3. So I am set up for years of use, and will continue to pick up a few more Palm III devices. I intend to have a fresh one to pull out if one dies 20 years from now.

    3. Re:Long live Palm Pilots! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. Three days ago I got fed up with the failing handwriting recognition of my old Palm Vx, Wednesday I bought a brand-new T|X (I was going to buy it with this year's tax refund but I was pushed beyond the point of endurance).

      I want something that I can put in my pant's pocket. With long battery life. With a good display. That doesn't crash.

      I don't want something with a cell phone, it will violate the size issue and also gives me a single point of failure depriving me of two devices if one fails or the unit is lost. I don't want an MP3 player in it, the fidelity will suck and it will suck more memory that I don't want to give over to it. I don't want Bluetooth, I don't want WiFi (it can't get onto my home network because of my security restrictions). I definitely don't want a digital camera as I'd like to do some DoD consulting at some point.

      And I don't want something from HP/Compaq: two B companies that merged to form a bigger B company (except their servers, I like Compaq servers).

      Sorry, I've been using Palm Pilots for over a decade and will not give it up until they pry my cold dead fingers from around it.
      You bought a Palm TX which does have WiFi, Bluetooth, and an MP3 player!

      You can't use a portable WiFi device on your own home WiFi network? What, you can't figure out how to configure your own home WiFi security to allow you to use your Palm TX on your own personal WiFi network? Are you kidding me? You'll never use your Palm TX over another WiFi network?

      As to integrated smartphones, if the phone stops working, you can still use the pda side; at least that is true with Palms. I've got both a Palm smartphone (Samsung i500) and a regular Palm PDA (Palm VIIx). I prefer smartphones rather than just a plain cell phone, smartphones are more useful and flexible than a plain cell phone, but I also prefer the larger screens of the PDA and as you said one should not put all one's eggs in one basket. Two devices are better than one, although when travelling light I leave the PDA at home.

      IMO there's still a market for Palm PDA's with wireless capabilities (ie, WiFi) because it's a convenient way to access the web without having to lug around a laptop, and without being dependent on the cell phone companies. With WiMax coming down the road in a few years, I expect Palms at least to survive in the PDA market as a wireless handheld device that one can use without signing contracts with a cell phone company.

      IMO it is a good thing companies like HP/Compaq and others are getting out of the PDA market; the market was too crowded anyway and will be better off left to companies specializing in PDAs and smartphones (ie, Palm).
    4. Re:Long live Palm Pilots! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The new Palm stuff is junk by comparison to a Palm III, so long as what you're aiming for is regular old PDA functionality.

      For just straight-up PIM, the Palm III series is a good way to go. My IIIx screen went bad in 2004, so I got a Zire 31 to replace it. It does require recharging every few days, and the screen is hard to read in bright sunlight.

      But for me the Zire 31 does have its advantages over the IIIx. I can store more books than I could possibly want. Color is actually pretty useful in looking at the month's schedule. Hotsync over USB is much faster than over a serial port. I automatically back up the RAM to an SD card every day, so nowadays I usually only hotsync when I want to install an app. And I can use it to play MP3s, which I do more often than I expected.

    5. Re:Long live Palm Pilots! by wwphx · · Score: 1

      Excellent idea, backing it up to the CF card daily. I don't think my data changes enough for that, but it's something that I'll have to keep in mind.

      --
      When you sympathize with stupidity, you start thinking like an idiot.
    6. Re:Long live Palm Pilots! by wwphx · · Score: 1

      I'm doing things with my home WiFi such as tkip, I don't think my Palm is going to handle that. It's also possible that I need to upgrade the OS from the factory-shipped as it won't sync at school either, and that's an open network.

      My problem with integrated smart phones is that if one side dies, while the other side is indeed still functional, you're going to lose it when you send the unit in for repair. Yes, if you want to pay for a service contract, you can get it replaced more rapidly, but as rural as my location is, I would never count on local cell providers to have replacements on hand. I like to get LOTS of time out of my Palms, and cell phone life (for me) is much shorter than PDA life.

      I agree that there is a market for the Bluetooth/WiFi/WiMax capability of PDAs, it's just not a selling point for me. I tend to be a bit of a luddite when it comes to persistant connectivity.

      --
      When you sympathize with stupidity, you start thinking like an idiot.
    7. Re:Long live Palm Pilots! by wwphx · · Score: 1

      I considered the cheaper ones, but I really liked the larger screen of the T|X and I wanted the add'l memory. Being a serious photographer in addition to a database/computer geek, it would be nice to have a small number of photos in my pocket. And I will definitely be exploiting the additional ram for loading in more books. I have a feeling I could put entire O'Reilly libraries on it....

      When I was server admin at a police dept, I had IP addresses and obscure passwords all stored in CryptoPad files. It was a great handy reference. When I leave the house any morning, I check for three things: Palm Pilot, digital voice recorder, and cell phone. And I wouldn't have a problem if I left the cell phone at home.

      Excellent point about referencing your Palm while on the phone. I've done it many times myself, and I have no idea what you'd do if you had a smartphone.

      --
      When you sympathize with stupidity, you start thinking like an idiot.
    8. Re:Long live Palm Pilots! by wwphx · · Score: 1

      The III was a great machine and my first Palm. I loved the simple clamshell case, a brilliant, simple, solution to protecting the unit. Bummer about your new unit dying so quickly. I have not yet determined how long I can go between charges, but I'm keeping a sync cable in my laptop bag (which is almost always with me) so I can snarf some juice for it in an emergency.

      That is an excellent strategy, buying "obsolete" units off eBay. Great way to recycle viable tech, and to help prevent increased landfill usage, albeit in a very small amount. ;-)

      --
      When you sympathize with stupidity, you start thinking like an idiot.
  70. Re:Depends on how you look at what constitutes a P by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My PDA beeps at me 15 minutes before an appointment. I can pull up a map on the same device to give me directions to said appointment.

    Now if I could get a scanner attachment for my PDA for all the notes I still scribble on paper, it'd be perfect.

  71. They're just hard to sell. by MS-06FZ · · Score: 1

    They're crap to use. I mean, they're *useless* for any serious amount of data input, have you ever tried writing a letter on one?

    No, but I used to draft short papers on my Palm III in college. At the time I had no laptop but wanted to be able to be somewhere other than my room and still get work done. The Palm was nice for that, especially as I got really good at Graffiti - plus it was easier to input accent marks and tildes (needed for those annoying Spanish assignments) on the Palm than on my PC.

    I say PDAs are hard to sell because they're a new kind of device. To sell a PDA you need to explain to people why they need a PDA. Selling phones is easy. People have used those for over a hundred years. People grew up with phones. So selling a phone that's battery-powered and mobile is easy to do - it's a familiar device, enhanced. But to sell the PDA, you've got to explain to people why they need this thing they didn't need before.

    To me, the advantages of having organizer functions in digital form, and of having a general-purpose computer that I really can have with me all the time are worth it. But smartphones are gradually taking over all that.

    --
    ---GEC
    I'm but the humble pupil, seeking to snatch the scratchbuilt pebble from the master's fully articulated hand
  72. Simple Simple SImple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use an old Palm Zire handheld. Black&White, not even greyscale. No backlight either. (ever hear of the sun?) Small, Very Durable, I have dropped it a few time and keep it in my pocket with my keys (without a screen protector!) and it works great. Recognizes text fast and well. Does calendar, Adressess, reads text controls my TV, keeps bank records, etc. Best Part? Battery Lasts SEVERAL WEEKS between charges.

    It's the next best thing to pencil and paper.

    Why not just make more SIMPLE devices, that do a few things very well. I dont need pictures/music, i have Digital Audio Player and a Camera for that.

    Similiarly, my Black and White Digital Audio Player (Creative Nomad Zen Xtra) stores 30 gigs, uses standard lappy HD, a replaceable battery and itself lasts 20 hrs playtime. It also costs less, and is more durable than, an IPOD. What happened to simple, highly effective devices?

    my little rant

  73. Any suggestions on a non-cell phone under $400 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm looking for a replacement to my Clie TJ37
    - under $400
    - *not* MS Windows based
    - replaceable battery

    I don't understand the rave about phones, I don't see the need for one. My office has one on the desk and I sometimes use one at home. I've used up one 500 minute calling card since like 2001.

    I use my PDA for reading books (I usually a book or so per week), task and project outlines (using progect right now), todo lists, and jotting down notes. Lots of notes on lots of different subjects. I don't use the calendar and I rarely use the contacts.

    I tried using paper, but then I end up retyping everything on my computer. With a PDA I just cut and paste.

  74. Bite me HP by djekz · · Score: 1

    I want to honestly see more interfaces like the palm's hardware pen. I mean c'mon, does that crappy little thumb keyboard actually appeal to you? When blackberries were introduced to the world I thought they were one of the most god awful interfaces to use ever. I think the palm will be a precursor to something even better, like a multi-point touchscreen interface. There is a reason that I want a palm and not a tablet. When I turn on my palm, it is on in under a second, and I don't have to deal with the Windows OS and all of it's crappy vulnerabilities and downfalls. My tablet and/or laptop will not fit in my pocket. When I think of a good interface, I think of the palm pen. Look at it this way. If there is a tree in front of you, do you want to have an axe? or do you want to type "chop" "chop" "chop" with your thumbs? I use my Tungsten C to get on my home wireless and talk to friends for free through the AIM client. I cannot do that with a phone because internet service on your phone is extra $$ from your regular internet. I like having one internet bill. When phones have an option to communicate entirely through web based services like 802.11 and bluetooth without charging you for minutes, and they have a more tangible interface than the pen interface palm uses (holographic projections and laser sensors?) maybe I'll consider dropping the PDA. If anything I wish more companies and portable devices would develop a more accessible and tangible interface. the point is, I have more muscles in my body that could be potentially used to communicate information than the ones I use for my thumbs!

  75. Re:Depends on how you look at what constitutes a P by DJCF · · Score: 1, Informative
    Yes, I tried one of those a few weeks ago. £20, why not! Unfortunately, you've been misled -- that £20 was one of the worst spent £20 I ever spent: the firm is a pure rip-off.

    First of all, I was told I was working on Wednesday at 9 so I pencilled that in, and yes, it was slightly faster (but only slightly) than my Nokia. But then I hit my first snag: nowhere could I find an alarm function to remind me. Thinking it was an extra module that had to be purchased seperately (which is really bad value for money, IMO) I spent ages on Google looking for it... to no avail. Thankfully I didnt miss work because I went back to my old Nokia's calendar to remind me. (Of course, it auto-synch'd via BT next time the computer was one.)

    The second problem I had was when I needed to record a complicated series of directions to get to a friend's house -- it was quite a way away and in the end my hand just got tired of writing (Oh, how I longed for a keypad). Again, the old Nokia came to the rescue and I used the record voice function to succesfully record directions -- I was very disapointed at the new solutions lack of audio recording or even a rudiumentary camera (640x480 even?)

    Another problem I kept running into was the lack of any audio player (perhaps thats another module)? I mean, I dont like having to carry around 3 devices with me everytime I go out when my Nokia was very much an all-in-one. Sure, I could have written out the OGG files in HEX and hummed them back to myself but I'm a student and to be honest, I don't really have that kind of time anymore.

    Another problem (they were really bugging me by this point) was no way to transfer e-books to the new solution save by hand. I tried transcribing Zarathustra but gave up only a few pages into the book -- it really wasnt worth it, so I just coppied it over BT to my Nokia. I could have bought the dead-tree with me (which I also owned) but I needed to take a few other books as well and it didnt fit into my bag.

    Finally the trial was bought to an abrupt halt when I dropped it. Yes, I'd been dropping it all week with no adverse affects but it had been raining and I dropped it in a puddle -- all my appointments, all my shopping and to-do lists, gone in a slimey mess of sticky paper. Now if I'd dropped my Nokia, sure, I'd have lost those but only temporarily thanks to the automatic bluetooth sync. I was so angry! I mean, what kind of device is built in this day and age without any kind of easy backup facilities?

    Folks, stay away from this -- its nothing but a sham and a waste of money.

  76. Ho-Hum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is true for HP - they're finding their market "challenged" to say the least. The problem is not the market, it's having a device somebody wants to buy. The recent handhelds have been very uninspiring, so smartphones are taking off. Unfortunately, it's "old wine in new bottles," basically phones with handhelds somewhat integrated in but still with the same-old interfaces.

    The non-smartphone handheld is become a niche device. Unfortunately for HP, they're handhelds aren't fitting the niches as well.

  77. High End PDA users know Squat! by Mike+Buddha · · Score: 1

    but this was very much an entry-level product and made few waves among the high-end, tech-savvy consumers that dominate the PDA segment.

    Yeah, right. That's why the low end Palms continue to break sales records? This notion that PDA's are being bought only by technophiles is pure rubbish. Yes, the PDA boards are dominated by tech-elitists, but the rank and file of users are not so saavy and don't seem interested in the overpriced, overfeatured PDA's that the nerds seem so enamored of.

    PDA-philes have been trumpeting the death of Palm OS for at least 10 years now, because they make the nut selling simple, non-feature laden PDA's. On the boards you read how foolish Palm is for leaving out this feature or changing that feature, and still Palm sells tons of PDAs.

    It's a fact that Technophiles and PDAphiles have zero clue as to what constitutes a marketable PDA. They just moan and groan that the current crop of PDAs can't do this as good as there computer, and can't do that as good as their computer, and can't do everything all at once. HP, Dell, and most of the other Windows Mobile manufacturers continue to listen to the whining on the boards and have continued to make overpriced, overpowered, underbatteried pieces of junk, and they all insist that the PDA market is dying . All the while, Palm listens to the regular folks who use the devices and has hit after hit after hit. Beware who you heed.

    --
    by Mike Buddha -- Someday the mountain might get him, but the law never will.
  78. Should have gone with iPAQ then... by Jetson · · Score: 1

    I've got the best of both worlds with my iPAQ h6325. It has a full-size pen-capable display just like the Palm, but comes with a free clip-on keyboard that resembles the one on the Treo. It supports the Palm-style pen input, and also does real (but often really bad) handwriting recognition. My preferred method of data entry is the on-screen keyboard. Pen-based hunt-n-peck is just as fast and easy as trying to learn the Palm alphabet.

  79. I Own An Ipaq by AC5398 · · Score: 1

    I own an Ipaq. It surfs the web via wifi; plays mp3's, wmv & wma files, divx movies, mpeg1 files, ogg vorbis files; opens word, powerpoint and excel documents without them having to be translated via the computer ala palm; opens adobe acrobat files; has solitaire; views photos; can access an sdcard and a compact flash card at the same time (I can copy files from the sdcard to the compact flash card using only the ipaq); has a decent speaker; I've found an antivirus/firewall program for it; and I've purchased a portable keyboard to go with it that has the number keys on their own line.

    The battery is removeable, lasts for hours, and is probably swappable with another for long journeys. I DON'T lose all my data when I lose all power as my model has flash memory.

    It and the keyboard fit into my purse with room to spare.

    The damn thing is a very light laptop with a really small screen.

    Anyone who says that pen-based pda's are dead is simply trying to explain why the consumer is hellbent on purchasing cumbersome gigantic laptops with a battery life of 20 minutes when all they need is a pda.

    1. Re:I Own An Ipaq by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you single?

    2. Re:I Own An Ipaq by Fenaxis · · Score: 1

      Which IPaq do you own?

    3. Re:I Own An Ipaq by AC5398 · · Score: 1

      hx24 something or other.

  80. Re:They haven't caught on because the interface su by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

    Their interfaces are generally good. Perhaps it's just a case of using the wrong tool for the job? I'm not sure why you'd want to write a letter on a PDA. They're not intended for that type of thing. They intended for looking up and entering small (but useful) amounts of data.

  81. Re:Depends on how you look at what constitutes a P by twitter · · Score: 1
    Whatever works for you is what you should use.

    I'm never going back to piles of notes in a drawer. I used to print out a calendar and carefully transfer all of my to do items from one page to the next, making notes along the way. This allowed some automation and, for once, I could remember people's birthdays. It worked but it had lots of problems my Handspring Visor fixed. It was hard to put everything in it and it was hard to search. When my list of things got bigger than one page, I was scratching in the margins. Invariably, small pieces of paper with information would accumulate in my drawers before I had time to organize them. The visor does searches and it alarms when I need to do something. Though it only had 8MB of storage, I never filled it up and everything was easy to find. No, I'm sticking to the pen based PDA.

    HP only hates them because M$ can't get handwriting recognition right. Palm got it write and do does Xstroke. HP and M$ may exit the category, but the category will exist until someone invents something that can read my mind.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  82. Cyrillic by The+Conductor · · Score: 1
    Palms also do cyrillic quite well. Cyrillic isn't too bad on a full-size keyboard, but having 33 letters means some punctuation marks are re-purposed as letters. But those keys are missing from the thumb boards. My Russian translator's keyboard is just fine though. I can't imagine a graceful way to make a cyrillic thumb board without adding just a few more keys or re-arranging the placement.

    The point is: Graffiti-like input can be software-optimized, while thumb-boards are hardware-optimized for a certain language. So Japanese key-driven gizmos (for example) don't work well in other languages, but the same Palm hardware can be sold worldwide.

  83. Oh Danny Boy, the pipes the pipes are calling... by Bushido+Hacks · · Score: 1

    It is so very sad that the PDA market has tanked. I had such high hopes for PDAs especially since when I was younger, I wish I had this technology to help me through school.

    But alas, the corporations have had their way with PDAs, slowly poisioning the PDA market as they nutured the iPod, PSP, and Blackberry. Dear Palm and Ipaq, Clie, Zaurus, and Newton, your shall not have died and been forgotten as the underground will preserve the legacy and never forget the importance of these portable devices. This technology will rise again, despite the dumbing down of technology and all those who use them.

    Besides, why the hell would anyone bring their collection of 2LiveCrew MP3s and watch television at a business meeting?

    --
    The Rapture is NOT an exit strategy.
  84. On the subject on making computers smaller. by we6jbo.webhop.net · · Score: 1

    A few months ago I overheared someone saying that Intel would be focusing technology on laptops (Maybe even the PDA market). This is assumed because corperate technology is rocketing and that the majority of this market is mobile. I hope Intel makes a good decision but does not neglect the need of new technology overall.

    - Jeremiah O'Neal
    http://www.we6jbo.webhop.net/

    Rev: 0x

    --
    Jeremiah B O'Neal http://geocities.com/we6jbo/
  85. 3D printing service by Cha$e · · Score: 1

    Fire up Blender, 3ds max, or what have you, and model a cool looking shell for the flash drive's guts. Then send the file to a 3D printing service such as www.3dArtToPart.com.

    1. Re:3D printing service by Cha$e · · Score: 1

      Please delete parent - I accidentally posted to wrong thread. I guess that's one argument for not having tabbed browsing :)

  86. Bad News by r0wan · · Score: 1

    This is not good. I have a thing against multifunction products because if one element breaks or becomes unusable it immediately negates the cost spent for an all in one item; you have to buy another component to make up for the malfunctioning one.

    It's been said before, but I like my phone to be just a phone and my camera, if and when I get one, to be just a camera. I love my iPAQ 4155, one of the reasons being that it has stylus input and a screen large enough to work with the stylus. If or when I upgrade, looks like HP won't be a brand to consider.

    Hopefully this isn't indicative of a larger trend. I can't imagine having to work with a cell phone sized screen when entering calendar or task info.

    --
    If you're not outraged, you're not paying attention.