Slashdot Mirror


Social Engineering Using USB Drives

Iphtashu Fitz writes "What's the easiest way to hack into the computer systems of a credit union? It turns out that all you need to do is copy a virus/trojan onto USB drives and scatter them around the front door of the credit union. This was how a recent security audit was performed at a credit union where the employees had actually been tipped off to the audit. Security experts collected 20 old USB thumb drives and filled them with images and other data along with a trojan that would collect sensitive information and e-mail it back to them. Early one morning they planted the thumb drives around the entrances to the credit union as well as other public places where the employees were known to congregate. In very little time 15 of the 20 USB drives were plugged into company computer systems and started e-mailing usernames, passwords, etc. back to the auditors."

447 comments

  1. wow by nb+caffeine · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Thats an amazingly clever idea. "Hey, free stuff" is what I would think. And then plug it into my ubuntu box :)

    --

    "Something's wrong with you...and I hope we never do meet again." - Deftones When Girls Telephone Boys
    1. Re:wow by HardCase · · Score: 3, Funny

      Oh crap...I'll be right back!

    2. Re:wow by Bender0x7D1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Unfortunately, even if you run ubuntu, you are still vulnerable - that's the beauty of social engineering.

      Sure, you might not fall for a renamed executable on a USB drive, but what if it's taken a step farther?

      Imagine you are walking into work early, and find an open folder on the floor, with some papers strewn around and a CD or DVD in with it. Imagine the paper is an application to put on a SIGGRAPH demonstration, and on the CD is a WINDOWS directory, a LINUX directory, a BSD directory and a SOLARIS directory and each directory has a file named SIGGRAPH_presentation.exe or there is a SIGGRAPH_presentation.jar, (eliminating the need for multiple OS versions), with a README about how to execute it. You figure, "What the heck - I love cool graphics."

      Now, while you are watching a cool graphics demo, it checks if you are logged in as root and, if you are, installs a nasty payload. If not, it could simply start emailing every file it finds in your home directory, or delete them, or encrypt them.

      I don't care what OS you are running, if you can be convinced to execute something, there will be some damage done. If you aren't root the damage is limited, but there is still damage. The attack may have to involve more research on a person's interests, or require more "found" hardware to convince someone, but it can be done. Maybe someone has to buy some hardware from ThinkGeek and make a fake installation disk, then leave the box, (with the modified disk), somewhere you will come across it.

      Being convinced you are immune to the dangers of social engineering is not a good way to avoid being social engineered. A healthy dose of paranoia can go far - and it's only paranoia if there isn't anyone out to get you.

      --
      Reading code is like reading the dictionary - you have to read half of it before you can go back and understand it.
    3. Re:wow by theLOUDroom · · Score: 1

      Sure, you might not fall for a renamed executable on a USB drive, but what if it's taken a step farther?
      ...
      each directory has a file named SIGGRAPH_presentation.exe or there is a SIGGRAPH_presentation.jar


      Your example is not "taking it a step farther". It is the same damn thing. It requires the user to manually discover that there is an executable and then to deliberately run it.

      What it comes down to is that people who are not properly trained should not have access to critical computer systems. In the days before my time these people were given dumb terminals on which software could not be installed. In that case of something important like a credit union, this article gives a great reeason for reinstating this practice.
      Do you want an employee bringing in their own USB drive and walking out with everyone's account information?

      --
      Life is too short to proofread.
    4. Re:wow by DeadChobi · · Score: 5, Funny

      Speaking of paranoia, someone left a disc labeled "THE TRUTH" on my car the other day. I wonder what I did with it? Oh yeah. I tossed it. If some wanker wants to tell me "THE TRUTH" then they can do it the old fashioned way, with pamphlets.

      I find it a little odd that mine was the only car in the parking lot with such a CD on it. Maybe I shoul@(*$)*@#%^Y@Ba;skONBIAEOSNA NO CARRIER

      --
      SRSLY.
    5. Re:wow by nb+caffeine · · Score: 1

      Good point. good thing i have autoplay disabled and probably would format the thing, not caring to know whos fob it was :)

      --

      "Something's wrong with you...and I hope we never do meet again." - Deftones When Girls Telephone Boys
    6. Re:wow by From+A+Far+Away+Land · · Score: 4, Funny

      I came home one day and this horse was waiting outside. Naturally I let it in. Damn Greeks!

    7. Re:wow by Bender0x7D1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Your example is not "taking it a step farther". It is the same damn thing. It requires the user to manually discover that there is an executable and then to deliberately run it.

      It is taking it a step farther - not from a technical standpoint, but from the social engineering standpoint. It is no longer an anonymous USB drive found in a parking lot, but a "dropped" folder that has many different artifacts reinforcing the point that it really is a graphics demo. The point is, if you are socially engineered, it doesn't matter what OS you run; and nearly everyone can be socially engineered - it just requires more time and effort on the part of the attacker to find a way.

      --
      Reading code is like reading the dictionary - you have to read half of it before you can go back and understand it.
    8. Re:wow by irtza · · Score: 1

      is anyone else reminded of the floating food from Harry Potter?

      --
      When all else fails, try.
    9. Re:wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Imagine the Cd is bootable...

    10. Re:wow by gaspyy · · Score: 2, Insightful
      it checks if you are logged in as root and, if you are, installs a nasty payload. If not, it could simply start emailing every file it finds in your home directory, or delete them, or encrypt them.


      And which one is worse? Why so many people don't understand that running as root doesn't solve anything in this case?

      The days of nasty payloads are over. They were popular in the early '90's (remember Michelangelo?), but nowadays it's more profitable to steal data instead. Armies of zombie computers, stolen credit card data and passwords, that's what this is all about.

      If I were a malware writer, I wouldn't want to kill my infected computers. I would nurture them instead so that they could provide me with as much information as possible for the longest time possible. Why would I format their hard drive or mess with the OS when I have access to their emails, passwords, documents, everything that really matters??
    11. Re:wow by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Free stuff? I would be more like, i wonder who this belongs too, maybe there is a file on it with information indecating whos it could be. Maybe there is a reward.

      I can see all kinds of reasons why someone wo0uld want to look at it. I think this is one test most people would fail at.

    12. Re:wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah dude, Go back and get that disk. I found your girlfriend making out with my wife and video taped it. Took pictures and even joined in eventualy. That periodic itching, it won't go away. I couldn't think of telling you to your face so i told you the truth on a cd.

    13. Re:wow by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      Anyone logged in as root deserves to lose.

    14. Re:wow by JThundley · · Score: 1

      Except Linux users typically do not run random executables, and are not easily tricked into running them. Windows by default hides the file extension and lets a program show whichever icon it wants. It's the oldest trick in the book.

    15. Re:wow by milkman_matt · · Score: 1

      I was thinking .. there's no way I would plug in a -found- drive like that to just anything.. windows machine? definitely not.. my powerbook? ...I don't think so, just to be on the safe side. But maybe booting up a gentoo LiveCD or something, that may be an option for the paranoid.

    16. Re:wow by Sheriff+of+Rockridge · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure root is disabled by default in ubuntu. So unless they used sudo to run SIGGRAPH, the system should be safe.

    17. Re:wow by mooncaine · · Score: 1

      Including me -- til I read this, which is one more good reason to visit /. ....

      What would happen if I plugged that evil USB drive into my Mac running the latest OSX?

    18. Re:wow by Nutria · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure root is disabled by default in ubuntu. So unless they used sudo to run SIGGRAPH, the system should be safe.

      Sure, the system files are safe, but your files (and the information inside them) are not!

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    19. Re:wow by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      Root isn't disabled, you just don't get the opportunity to set a password.

      So unless they used sudo to run SIGGRAPH, the system should be safe.

      Sure, the *system* is safe - but all of those confidential documents that you work on aren't. They're vulnerable to being emailed and/or trashed along with the rest of your files.

    20. Re:wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um...I...look, if we built this large wooden badger...

    21. Re:wow by ockegheim · · Score: 1

      That's the sort of ingenious and well-researched thing they do in the movies. It always works there. And in the real world, almost anyone could be persuaded to load a CD or thumb drive that's sufficiently interesting to them. At the moment if I found a thumb drive labelled "World of Warcraft mod XML interface made easy" I'd definitely think of my coding needs over my computer security.

      --
      I’m old enough to remember 16K of memory being described as “whopping”
    22. Re:wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am reminded of the ancient warning, "Beware of geeks bearing GIFs"

    23. Re:wow by jimicus · · Score: 1

      Except Linux users typically do not run random executables

      Only because there are rather fewer of us and most of us have more sense than to do this. I think the point the parent is making is to pre-empt the incoming band of drones who say "But if Linux was as popular as Windows, this couldn't have happened!"

      Windows by default hides the file extension

      Linux doesn't even use file extensions all the time.

      lets a program show whichever icon it wants.

      Which has had a side effect - that a computer user who doesn't quite understand what the purpose of icons is forced to conclude that it's just supposed to be a pretty picture, rather than giving any inkling of what will happen when you click on it. The only way to find that out is to click on it..... Transplanting this misunderstanding wholesale (and let's face it, if Linux were to become popular this is exactly what would happen) to Linux won't help.

    24. Re:wow by Rigrig · · Score: 0

      Let me guess: they snuck in through the back gate while you were waiting for them to come out of the horse?

      --
      **TODO** [X] Steal someone elses sig.
    25. Re:wow by Haeleth · · Score: 1

      The days of nasty payloads are over. They were popular in the early '90's (remember Michelangelo?), but nowadays it's more profitable to steal data instead. Armies of zombie computers, [...] that's what this is all about.

      And how, exactly, do you think a computer is turned into a zombie, except by installing a nasty payload?

      Even Windows doesn't come with a rootkit built in.

    26. Re:wow by jeremymiles · · Score: 1
      Sure, you might not fall for a renamed executable on a USB drive, but what if it's taken a step farther?

      But that's 300% more effort (or 100% if you just went for one OS) for a couple of percent more gain. If I were doing such things, I'd spend the effort on more USB sticks, not more OSes. Another of the joys of not using Windows.

      --
      GENERATION 26: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation.
    27. Re:wow by geggo98 · · Score: 1
      Now, while you are watching a cool graphics demo, it checks if you are logged in as root and, if you are, installs a nasty payload. If not, it could simply start emailing every file it finds in your home directory, or delete them, or encrypt them.
      Better: It will search for some downloads and will add something like RealPlayer11-11.0.7-5.i586 .rpm or wmv-codecs_13.1-1sarge1_all.deb. With some luck, you will find this file later and try to install it. Then the malware has root access...
    28. Re:wow by Arker · · Score: 1

      If you're running as root you're a moron. You're right, there is no technical solution to moronitude.

      Assuming a half-way competent administrator means there are no users running as root, and no confidential data stored in /home either. So the damage this could do is minimal.

      --
      =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
      Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
    29. Re:wow by indifferent+children · · Score: 1

      On my workstation, I have an account called 'anon' just to visit dodgy websites and run dodgy software. There's nothing in /home/anon (I 'rm -Rf' the contents periodically to get rid of bookmarks, etc). Running Linux gets you 90% of the way to safe, a few simple practices facilitated by the tools built-in to Linux get you the rest of the way there. The same holds true for most non-Microsoft OSes.

      --
      Censorship is telling a man he can't have a steak just because a baby can't chew it. --Mark Twain
    30. Re:wow by Himring · · Score: 1

      Or maybe it was someone trying to inform you of your wife's affair....

      --
      "All great things are simple & expressed in a single word: freedom, justice, honor, duty, mercy, hope." --Churchill
    31. Re:wow by Foobar+of+Borg · · Score: 2, Funny
      I am reminded of the ancient warning, "Beware of geeks bearing GIFs"

      I thought it was "Beware of geeks baring in GIFs"

    32. Re:wow by freedom_india · · Score: 1
      it checks if you are logged in as root

      Ahh.... one more poor soul confusing root access with administrator access....

      I tried the same way you said in my Mac OS X 10.4.6 UNDER Terminal AFTER logging in as root with sudo....

      My java access prevented me from doing any harm because the JVM for Mac OS X is set to operate WITH java.policy file

      --
      "Doing what i can, with what i have." ~ Burt Gummer
    33. Re:wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's amazing about your "joke" is that people still find the "NO CARRIER" gag funny.

    34. Re:wow by clearbluesky · · Score: 1

      I don't think so. I would boot from a live CD distro and then examine the USB stick. If I was really worried about my hard drive I would completely disconnect it then boot from a Live CD and examine the USB stick.

    35. Re:wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It still can overwrite your Flash BIOS and wait there to access your data after you have reconnected the original hard drive.

    36. Re:wow by operagost · · Score: 1
      If I were a malware writer, I wouldn't want to kill my infected computers. I would nurture them instead so that they could provide me with as much information as possible for the longest time possible.
      My malware defrags the disk, cleans up the registry, removes viruses, and uninstalls AOL. My minions run better AFTER I 0wnz0r them!
      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    37. Re:wow by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 1

      Sure they can. However, if you stuck them on a dumb terminal, there would be no way that oh-so-helpful young man from tech support could talk them into uploading a "patch" onto their terminal.

      Thin clients and dumb terminals are great because they don't allow users to run things on a production system. the most they could be conned into doing is changing or exposing the information that they have access to by virtue of their position, and that kind of thing is usually pretty easy to audit.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    38. Re:wow by Bender0x7D1 · · Score: 1

      That's true, but that's why social engineers will target those employees who DO have access. Using thin clients and dumb terminals is great from the "prevent user mistakes" angle, but doesn't help when the admins are the one who are duped. Maybe someone has to act like they are a new sales rep from IBM or Microsoft and have some cool freebies. How about a Das Keyboard that has been modified to include a key logger? Maybe a new firewall for evaluation purposes? It doesn't matter what it is - it just has to be sweet enough for the person to try it.

      --
      Reading code is like reading the dictionary - you have to read half of it before you can go back and understand it.
    39. Re:wow by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1
      And how, exactly, do you think a computer is turned into a zombie, except by installing a nasty payload?
      That really depends on what you consider a "nasty payload". For some it may be limited to something that destroys files. For others, it may only need to call the user "Miss Jackson".

      What if the covert payload turned the system into a zombie for doing protein folding, analyzing radio signals for SETI, or decrypting terrorist communications?

      Or maybe it installed to seek and destroy Malware of Internet Corruption and is sticking around only to preserve the stability of the host system against invasions by other malware so that that malware doesn't have to be defended against at the payload's source.
      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    40. Re:wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Will you 0wn me, please?

    41. Re:wow by FurryFeet · · Score: 1

      No, no you won't.

      Your Boss.

    42. Re:wow by Willuknight · · Score: 1

      theres no way in hell i would install anything with either of those filenames.. geez good lord.

      --
      Do not anger the Karma Whores, for they don't bathe often, and might decide to come visit you in person. -Ryan Amos
    43. Re:wow by geggo98 · · Score: 1
      theres no way in hell i would install anything with either of those filenames.. geez good lord.
      Right, because you are an educated user, so social engineering won't work. A clueless users would be glad to find that stuff, that isn't included in their distro by default. For the moment, most clueless users are equiped with windows; but this might change in some distant future. Unix is immune against a lot of attacks and becomes better and besster --- just think of SELinux and AppArmor integrated in some modern Linux distros. But Unix is not immune against social engineering when operated by uneducated users.
  2. Neat Trick by Luke+Psywalker · · Score: 2, Funny

    Will have to try it...

  3. Autoplay Trojan by Renraku · · Score: 1

    I thought of that a while back..be easy to infect people. Just hand it to them and ask them what's on it. Windows is happy to run it.

    --
    Job? I don't have time to get a job! Who will sit around and bitch about being broke and unemployed then?
    1. Re:Autoplay Trojan by bblboy54 · · Score: 1

      Windows is happy to run it.

      Windows is happy to run anything that can potentially make your life misserable. Hell, Windows it's self is happy to just make your life misserable.

  4. Great How-To by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now all I need are some USB Thumb Drives.

    On an unrelated note, does anyone have any USB Thumb drives they dont need?

    1. Re:Great How-To by morcheeba · · Score: 3, Funny

      I hear you find them in certain parking lots...

  5. It's definitely a problem... by Coopjust · · Score: 4, Informative

    Given autoplay and the fact that many USB keys do not need drivers, this could turn out to be a serious problem.

    Why not just disable USB keys? They don't need to take that data home with them...the ChoicePoint disaster, several laptops stolen out of cars... these companies need to make are personal data more secure.

    1. Re:It's definitely a problem... by jafiwam · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Per the autopay dis-abler function in the group policy in windows, all removable drives aside from optical disks (DVD/CDROM) have autoplay disabled by default.

      They didn't use autoplay, they used an enticing file name on an executable. (My wife Pics.exe (with a zip icon) would do it.)

      It's sort of interesting that 15 new devices made it in the building without anyone talking about it. "Hey, look what I found" "Mine is a gig!" "Me too!". They all put it in to see what's on it probably knowing it's against the rules and did it anyway.

      It's not ignorance, its "i think i can get away with it."

      I wish I could find thumb drives in the parking lot.

      On another note, I sure hope that company didn't send the stuff they collected unencrypted. That's a violation of a bunch of rules. Penetrating a network for a security audit shouldn't lower the overall security of the network, if they sent unecrypted that's exactly what they did though.

    2. Re:It's definitely a problem... by Skater · · Score: 1

      Can't we take memos home to work on them on our telework days? There are other reasons for USB keys besides moving actual secure data - memos and code come to mind.

    3. Re:It's definitely a problem... by cgenman · · Score: 1

      As far as I know it's impossible to autoplay upon USB insertion. If anyone knows how to do this, please speak up.

    4. Re:It's definitely a problem... by LordSnooty · · Score: 1

      But I use my USB drive to quickly ssh&vnc into my home box.

    5. Re:It's definitely a problem... by Hoho19 · · Score: 1

      Create a cd partition on the USB drive and put your autorun.ini there. THat's what my U3 Drive does....

    6. Re:It's definitely a problem... by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Under Windows XP, it's just like a CD Drive- just add an autorun.inf file, and you can do whatever you want on insertion. If none is found, there's a whole host of other automatic things that can happen as well- it will also search the drive for multimedia stuff and prompt the user to play/show the files found, copy the files to a local folder, etc.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    7. Re:It's definitely a problem... by Willie_the_Wimp · · Score: 1

      I have a 2G sandisk U3 drive as well, and that "feature" pissed me off royally. I disabled it on my main work PC, but any time I plug it in to another PC, that little app is launched. Made me want to return the drive, but I bought it for nearly nothing, so I'll put up with the "feature" to have the 2 gigs of thumbdrive space.

      Willie

    8. Re:It's definitely a problem... by smash · · Score: 1
      VPN+RDP

      There is NO NEED for confidential company data to leave your premises.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    9. Re:It's definitely a problem... by MrAnnoyanceToYou · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure they needed it to show up as an executable. They probably just laced the image files with spyware, which is apparently possible now.

      This is Cooooollllld. Interesting thing is that five of the twenty were contractors / non-bank employees / someone else who had access to bank PC's... Wonder if they made it through the ensuing furor.

    10. Re:It's definitely a problem... by RevDobbs · · Score: 1
      They probably just laced the image files with spyware, which is apparently possible now.

      Citation? Please?

    11. Re:It's definitely a problem... by Mirage · · Score: 1

      Actually it isn't. I tried to get my thumb drive to run a program when I attached it to my computer at home, and found that Windows won't automatically run an autorun.inf on anything that reports itself as a removable media device, I believe. I think different USB drives behave differently, but I couldn't get mine to run anything that way.

    12. Re:It's definitely a problem... by WhiplashII · · Score: 2, Informative

      Or how about this as a vector - put an executable file on the disk, labeled "Sexy Pics" and with a folder icon. Windows by default does not show extensions... and it is safe to click on folders, right?

      --
      while (sig==sig) sig=!sig;
    13. Re:It's definitely a problem... by Skater · · Score: 1

      Then when that gets broken, you'll be posting here about how bad the security setup is...blah blah blah.

    14. Re:It's definitely a problem... by Kadin2048 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      On another note, I sure hope that company didn't send the stuff they collected unencrypted. That's a violation of a bunch of rules. Penetrating a network for a security audit shouldn't lower the overall security of the network, if they sent unecrypted that's exactly what they did though

      They could have caused the data to be sent unencrypted to a test machine inside the corporate network somewhere, or directly connected to the corporate network for the purposes of the test but outside the firewalls. That would demonstrate the possibility that the data could be sent to an arbitrary machine somewhere, but without actually sending any data unencrypted over the corporate net.

      Or they could have just SSHed to their remote test machine, that would probably be just as good and not that hard to implement.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    15. Re:It's definitely a problem... by Mr.+Freeman · · Score: 1

      Well, you better disable the CD-ROM drives too because you have the same problem.
      In fact, it's about 10 times more likely to occur with CDs because they're a lot cheaper than USB drives.

      --
      -1 disagree is not a modifier for a reason. -1 troll, flaimbait, redundant, overrated are NOT acceptable substitutes.
    16. Re:It's definitely a problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      all removable drives aside from optical disks (DVD/CDROM) have autoplay disabled by default.

      I suspect you're working in an environment with a central group policy that's locked that down for you. Otherwise, why is it that when I set up my Flash drive with an Autoplay.ini to run a copy of the TweakUI installer, I found half a dozen XP machines missing that particular "default"?

      It really pissed off one of my IT cow-orkers, since one of the machines was his desktop, found a couple weeks after I finished checking all my machines. He was giving me a copy of a sales presentation; I handed him my flash drive, he put it in, and the TweakUI installer started running on its own. "What the hell...?" "Oh, yeah; that's a security hole you might want to close, Rick...."

    17. Re:It's definitely a problem... by deek · · Score: 1
      Per the autopay dis-abler function in the group policy in windows, all removable drives aside from optical disks (DVD/CDROM) have autoplay disabled by default.

      They didn't use autoplay, they used an enticing file name on an executable. (My wife Pics.exe (with a zip icon) would do it.)


      Does Windows have the ability to attach devices with a "noexec" option? That seems like it'd be handy in this situation.

      Can Windows admins prevent executable access to any area a user can write to, or attach devices to? It seems like this would be enough to prevent this sort of situation. If not, then I guess it's score one more for Unix system security.
    18. Re:It's definitely a problem... by x2A · · Score: 1

      Hold shift key while inserting?

      --
      The revolution will not be televised... but it will have a page on Wikipedia
    19. Re:It's definitely a problem... by x2A · · Score: 1

      They might be cheaper, but far less interesting, and less discrete. With a USB drive, even if you're not interested in potentially routing through someone's files, you can still wipe it and use it yourself... which involves putting it into your machine.

      --
      The revolution will not be televised... but it will have a page on Wikipedia
    20. Re:It's definitely a problem... by MrAnnoyanceToYou · · Score: 1

      Hrm. Well, this is an interesting one. McAffee apparently got me here. But I did of course read it here, so I can't believe I didn't see the whole thing and take note of it. Man, am I lame. Point in fact, though, if you set up the USB drive to have EXE files that looked like images and launched sub-rosa Windows programs when you clicked on them in Exploder, it could be done.... Hidden registry changes before you launch Paint, or whatever.... Yeah, I'm backtracking. I suck for not doing all my research thoroughly. Point in fact, it could be done so that it LOOKED like an image but acted otherwise when you double-clicked easily.

    21. Re:It's definitely a problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Autoplay would have to be one of the worst pc features. Ever. At best it's annoying (audio cd's autoplaying when you want to rip them, for example). At worst it can damage your computer (literally - see sony), endanger your privacy (see this example) and install god-knows-what god-knows-where.

    22. Re:It's definitely a problem... by SpaceLifeForm · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Reformat the USB key? The bottom line: It's a *WINDOWS* exploit. Get off of Microsoft products, and you don't have these problems. Businesses that continue to use Microsoft software are, plain and simple, asking for problems. Potentially, *MAJOR* financial problems. Stockholders should *DEMAND* that businesses stop using Microsoft products because they are a very strong potential liability.

      --
      You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.
    23. Re:It's definitely a problem... by x2A · · Score: 1

      I was talking about when inserting it into someone elses comp, not your own. You can advise they turn off their autorun, or just hold down shift. (Although the easy solution sounds like just removing the autorun.inf file).

      Your attitude to just getting off using windows is a little naive, things unfortunately aren't that simple out here in the real world. Companies can lock down Windows much more easily than migrating (and often rewriting) software over to another OS, they just often don't.

      --
      The revolution will not be televised... but it will have a page on Wikipedia
    24. Re:It's definitely a problem... by Xabraxas · · Score: 1

      Yeah U3 sucks. Just get the uninstaller.

      --
      Time makes more converts than reason
    25. Re:It's definitely a problem... by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Stockholders should *DEMAND* that businesses stop using Microsoft products because they are a very strong potential liability.

      Yes, because spending *HUGE* chunks of money to avoid a potential problem is what big business is all about...

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
    26. Re:It's definitely a problem... by smash · · Score: 1
      There's precautions you can take - however having a network policy which allows any and all untrusted media to be installed/used in your machines is not taking due care.

      It's all about managing risk.

      If you require users to work from home, a better bet is a VPN connection allowing only the relevant protocols to pass through. Yes, it's still a risk, but less so than untrusted media.

      A far better option is point to point connection via leased line.

      We're not talking about a small regular company office here - we're talking about a credit union, who should be taking more care with security related matters.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    27. Re:It's definitely a problem... by Himring · · Score: 1

      It's not ignorance, its "i think i can get away with it."

      Now why did you just do that? ...create that pang of guilt in me for getting away with /. all this time....

      --
      "All great things are simple & expressed in a single word: freedom, justice, honor, duty, mercy, hope." --Churchill
    28. Re:It's definitely a problem... by Captain+Zep · · Score: 1
      "Does Windows have the ability to attach devices with a "noexec" option? That seems like it'd be handy in this situation."

      Dunno, but if it does then people would just copy the files to somewhere where they can execute. They want to see the promised sexy pictures (or whatever), remember.

      I wonder whether 'dontClickMe.exe' would also be a good hook?

      Z.

    29. Re:It's definitely a problem... by argStyopa · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's sort of interesting that 15 new devices made it in the building without anyone talking about it. "Hey, look what I found" "Mine is a gig!" "Me too!". They all put it in to see what's on it probably knowing it's against the rules and did it anyway.

      Thus the the counterintuitively high 'value' to a social engineer (read: con-man) of and administration PROHIBITING something that's human nature.

      Everyone will do it.
      Everyone knows they are not supposed to.
      Because it's 'wrong', nobody will tell anyone else.
      Thus even IF something is obviously wrong the inclination of the victim is to HIDE their own culpability for as long as possible, making the problem last much longer (until someone else notices) and the solution THAT much harder to implement.

      (Rube: Hm. I put in that USB drive I found on the ground outside, now my computer is beeping and the hard drive is grinding away and my email is now running REALLY slowly...yikes, I'm going to get in trouble, I'll just 'disappear' the drive, call IT, and tell them something's funny with my computer."
      (IT guy shows up) "Hi, what's up?"
      Rube: I dunno, it just started doing that...)

      [I'm against legalization, but there are strong parallels here to our Anti Drug laws, IMO.]

      Logically in the case of the USB drives, a more tolerant, understanding policy that accepts human nature would be more secure. Something like - we don't mind if you install stuff from home, just get it cleared with the IS dept first.

      You're still going to have rulebreakers, but if people don't think they're going to get in trouble for ANY violation, you have better conformance universally.

      --
      -Styopa
    30. Re:It's definitely a problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Acttually, the easiest way to disable Flash Drives is just to put some epoxy in the USB ports. Why do employees where information is considered confidential need USB access anyway?

    31. Re:It's definitely a problem... by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      Can Windows admins prevent executable access to any area a user can write to

      I've only had a very, very quick play with this on my own machine, but it appears to be possible. Windows has a "Read and Execute" permission that can be set on directories, which is independent of the "Read" permission. I just created a directory, removed my "Read and Execute" permission, and dropped an exe and a pdf in it.

      I can't execute the exe, but I can still read the pdf.

      As to how practical it would be to apply this to all user-readable areas, and whether or not you could have it apply to user-mountable devices, I don't know, but so far it's not impossible.

    32. Re:It's definitely a problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just because it's in the package of a flash drive doesn't mean that it is. I've built a keyboard inside a flash drive's enclosure. Why keyboard? It's white-listed on a USB firewall, and, odds are, that you won't disable the kb.

    33. Re:It's definitely a problem... by jp10558 · · Score: 1

      There is a way to uninstall it. http://www.u3.com/uninstall/

      --
      Opera, Proxomitron-Grypen,GPG 0x0A1C6EE3
  6. Oh crap!!! by rvw14 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I better unplug that USB drive I found this morning.

    1. Re:Oh crap!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      To late. And I've already emailed your wife about all those gay porn sites you visit.

    2. Re:Oh crap!!! by rahard · · Score: 1
      I better unplug that USB drive I found this morning.

      Too late dude!
      Your password has been mailed to us. It's ... 41wvr
      Boy that was easy.

    3. Re:Oh crap!!! by soft_guy · · Score: 2, Funny

      Come on, we all know no one on Slashdot has a wife.

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
    4. Re:Oh crap!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, but you're forgetting the ones married to Ms. Palmer

    5. Re:Oh crap!!! by CortoMaltese · · Score: 5, Funny
      I better unplug that USB drive I found this morning.
      Yeah, the trojan has been posting score:5, funny comments as you all over the place.
    6. Re:Oh crap!!! by rvw14 · · Score: 1

      Darn it, I'm changing my pasword back to 1-2-3-4-5.

  7. Unfortunatly... by Bryansix · · Score: 1

    Most people who work in an office do not read this website. Therefore they will probably still stick USB drives they find into their computer be the victims of identity fraud, corporate espionage, etc.

    1. Re:Unfortunatly... by MrShaggy · · Score: 1

      'OMG! There are pictures of PONIES!!' MMM

      --
      I have mod points and I am not afraid to use them.
    2. Re:Unfortunatly... by nitehawk214 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Most people who work in an office do not read this website.

      No, but many IT professionals do. Hopefully they educate their users to be wary of anything they dont own. It's not much different then opening an attachment from an email you receive.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    3. Re:Unfortunatly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Most people who work in an office do not read this website. Therefore...
      Well, most people who work in an office don't visit gay-porn websites either, but, like you, a hell of a lot of them do.

      burn!

    4. Re:Unfortunatly... by Ragnarrokk · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, it was on Digg too!

      ``Ragnarok

      (Joke, haha, y'know? I can see someone already firing up the flame-mail 3000 if I don't clarify)

    5. Re:Unfortunatly... by Drakin020 · · Score: 1

      Thoes are the same people that open the e-mails saying GROW YOUR P33N IN 12 EASY MINUTES!!!!! and I say tuff shnozzleberrys to them. If there dumb enough to do that they deserve what they get. (Cept for the network affected)

      --
      The greatest revenge in life is massive success.
    6. Re:Unfortunatly... by guruevi · · Score: 1

      Well, I work at an office implementing Sarbanes-Oxley on their environment (auditing, removing administrator rights). One of the department managers doesn't like it very much and gives me problems. It's not only the users you have to educate (because they are dumb) but sometimes you have to go through a whole lot of problems to implement something after which a rogue manager with some administrator rights destroys it own handed.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
  8. Human curiosity kills the computer by PlusFiveTroll · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is going to be a hard one to stop. Humans are curious, when you find a cd, hard drive, thumb drive, the first thing your going to want to do is stick it in your computer and find out what juicy secrets are on it.

    My best advice for corporations is to lock down the computers and only allow approved devices by security profile. Trying to train people not to act like people will fail.

    Any better ideas other then beating the users with a stick or JB Weld in any unused ports on a computer.

    1. Re:Human curiosity kills the computer by skiflyer · · Score: 1

      yeah, if you have tech savy enough company take a modest machine, stick it near the break room, don't connect it to the network at all and let people use it for curious disks/thumbdrives/applications. Would be nice if you ghosted or vmwared it frequently so users didn't pass the trojans from one USB key to another as well.

      Eh, don't imagine anyone really doing this, but it wouldn't be an awful idea.

    2. Re:Human curiosity kills the computer by Chabil+Ha' · · Score: 1

      My company already does...it's annoying as hell when trying to listen to a music collection. Putting it on a CD/DVD/R just sucks...

      --
      We're all hypocrites. We all have hidden parts, it's the contrast between them that make us more a hypocrite than others
    3. Re:Human curiosity kills the computer by MisterSquid · · Score: 1, Insightful
      Humans are curious, when you find a cd, hard drive, thumb drive, the first thing your going to want to do is stick it in your computer and find out what juicy secrets are on it.

      Yes, they are curious about prurient matters, but some of them are also thoughtful and helpful. Notwithstanding the selfish behavior of some people who find unattended hardware, many people would understand the value of the data contained on a lost thumb drive. I personally would have mounted the thumb drive on my desktop in order to find clues that might help me return the drive to its rightful owner.

      If along the way I had found a "sexy.jpg" or some email with the subject line "Want to meet for quickie?", yeah, I might have opened it up (I run a Mac and probably live a bit too dangerously even given near-zero infection rates of Macs today). But I would have definitely tried to get the drive back to its owner.

      --
      blog
    4. Re:Human curiosity kills the computer by dukeisgod · · Score: 1

      Too bad most of them aren't as paranoid as geeks tend to be. I don't know about everybody else, but one of the first things that pops into my mind regarding somebody else's data is viruses, etc. I'm definitely curious and want to nose around, but odds are it'll be with an expendable linux box first.

    5. Re:Human curiosity kills the computer by iaminthetrunk · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Any better ideas other then beating the users with a stick or JB Weld in any unused ports on a computer.

      I work at a Fortune 500 company, that actually hands out USB keys with laptop provisionings. Not only might we one day find hackers attempting to place USB keys outside, we already occassionally find misplaced usb keys inside the building. Plugging one in to find out whom to return it to is both obvious and a common practice upon finding one misplaced.

      However - we have a 'test lab' box on the floor - where we test software downloads, open source libraries, etc., for wholesome behavoir before submitting them for approval for production use, hence it's straightforward to pop the usb key in over there, a brief stroll away, on a safe box not hooked up to email or the general network. It's a fairly easy habit to acquire, although same-floor convenience is probably key.

      Being curious is one thing. Being curious and setting loose a virus when a test lab box was trivially nearby is arguably another thing; it's generally understood you'd catch extra hell for being lazy in that scenario and deserve it.

      People are lazy in addition to being curious, of course. But it is a suggestion. Most companies large enough to have too many employees to rigorous train on security, are also generally large enough to provide test lab boxes, (and virtual server sofware, vpn work arrangements from home, etc.)

      --
      "The hottest places in Hell are reserved for those who, in times of moral crisis, preserved their neutrality." -Dante
    6. Re:Human curiosity kills the computer by babbling · · Score: 1

      Why should company computers have floppy disk drives, CD/DVD ROM drives, or USB ports? Additionally, perhaps there should be some way of "locking" keyboards and mice onto computers to prevent hardware loggers.

    7. Re:Human curiosity kills the computer by PlusFiveTroll · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hmm, Sounds like the best answer is.

      1) Text file on drive with your name and number.
      2) Encrypt every thing else!

      You might get your drive back then.

      If you want to look at the disk.

      1) create non privliged testuser account on your linux (or other non standard OS) box (pref' non x86).
      2) view drive contents.
      3) remove testuser account when done.

      Your chances of getting pwned by some tricky bastard would be much lower.

    8. Re:Human curiosity kills the computer by noidentity · · Score: 1

      Man, I'd be extremely wary of running an executable from media found in that context (if I had to, I'd run it on a junk machine). I'm already fairly suspicious about just downloading Mac OS X software from an author's web page, but like hell I'd run something from someone else's computer. How hard is it to block access to any executable content via the USB drive (including copying to the local disk)?

    9. Re:Human curiosity kills the computer by dotgain · · Score: 1

      I don't know for sure how you'd do it on OSX, but you want to read up on "noexec", that's the option you can use in a linux /etc/fstab on a partition which will not permit the kernel to execute files directly from that disk. You could, of course, copy them to a partition and execute them there, but that's very deliberate.

    10. Re:Human curiosity kills the computer by ross.w · · Score: 1

      Documents to take with you to work on at home, documents you need to take with you to your desk in a client's office, working in a project alliance office with no access to your main office computer. All presupposing of course that your IT dept is too paranoid to give you an iPass token. Stoopid innit?

      --
      If my call is important, why am I talking to a recording?
    11. Re:Human curiosity kills the computer by x2A · · Score: 1

      "1) create non privliged testuser account on your linux (or other non standard OS) box (pref' non x86).
      2) view drive contents.
      3) remove testuser account when done."


      A person who can do that isn't gonna be the kinda person this article's talking about.

      --
      The revolution will not be televised... but it will have a page on Wikipedia
    12. Re:Human curiosity kills the computer by azhrei_fje · · Score: 1

      Actually, I would use my SUSE-based VMware session, most likely, with the persistent storage option turned off (shutdown VMware and the drive reverts back to its previous state).

      It does make me wonder, though. Even VMware would require some tweaking to avoid contamination outside the virtual box (I have shared folders enabled on my VMware sessions, along with host networking and bridged networking)...

    13. Re:Human curiosity kills the computer by radish · · Score: 1

      Ours don't, or rather they do have USB ports but they're all disabled. Useful for charging my ipod but nothing else. There's also a blanket rule against ever putting any company data on any non-company machine, so if you want to work at home you either take a company laptop home or connect via vpn and use remote desktop to your work machine.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    14. Re:Human curiosity kills the computer by Spliffster · · Score: 1
      Any better ideas other then beating the users with a stick or JB Weld in any unused ports on a computer.
      Throwing chairs at the user?
    15. Re:Human curiosity kills the computer by Lumpy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      My best advice for corporations is to lock down the computers and only allow approved devices by security profile.

      great idea. Problem is that Corperations refuse to allow IT to limit what the managers, sales and marketing staff can do with their PC.

      Almost all IT managers and staff are frustrated completely with the fact that some upper VP exec is enough of an asshole that he DEMANDED that all the sales PC's came with DVD burners and other giant security holes simply for the sake of convienence.

      Until someone severely beats into the heads of the executives of these corperations that catering to the morons in sales will cost you more in the long run instead of forcing those children to actually follow the rules and ensuring security it will never EVER change.

      Last time I worked Corperate IT management and we had a virus outbreak it was traced to the Director of Marketing's work laptop as the intiial source. It seems that Directors do not have to obey any of the rules and he demanded that he run as administrator all the time. This was directed by the VP of IT as he sits in the same office suite as the Director and he whines.

      The fact that the Upper management of the IT devision also do not understand what their department needs and does further makes it a mess.

      S othese kinds of things will forever happen because the upper IT management will roll over in an instant for other department management.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    16. Re:Human curiosity kills the computer by Falkkin · · Score: 1

      "create non privliged testuser account on your linux (or other non standard OS) box"

      Better idea... use any live CD, and make sure that it doesn't mount any of your real hard drives before you plug the USB stick in. For more paranoia, use Anonym.OS, the OpenBSD live CD: http://kaos.to/cms/content/view/14/32/. For maximum paranoia, unplug your hard drives entirely before booting the CD... maybe the stick exploits a security vulnerability in your live CD to gain root access and mount your hard drives.

    17. Re:Human curiosity kills the computer by Cyberscythe · · Score: 1

      Or, you could create a virtual machine and plug it into that.

      Or, buy (or pickup from the landfill) a PII and install Windows ME on it and check it out there. (Be sure to microwave the computer afterwards)

      Or, you could strap it into a chair, bring a hot house lamp down above its head and demand, in a German accent, 'vhat they vant with your computer.'

    18. Re:Human curiosity kills the computer by dawnzer · · Score: 1

      Ooooooo... JB Weld in any unused ports... will that work with my preteen? I am a civil engineer, not a computer guru, so that is right up my alley. ;)

      --
      "Oh, say, can you see by the dawnzer lee light," sang Miss Binney
    19. Re:Human curiosity kills the computer by westyx · · Score: 1

      The first thing i'd do is TAKE IT HOME and use it. Granted, before reading this article my personal data would be out there, but i'd never put something like that into a work computer.

  9. Autoplay trojan? by Ant+P. · · Score: 5, Funny

    I would've put autoplay Goatse on them, personally.

    1. Re:Autoplay trojan? by TubeSteak · · Score: 4, Informative
      Even though you're joking, what you're proposing has been around for a looooong time.

      http://lastmeasure.com/
      Last Measure is a wholly owned subsidiary of the Gay Nigger Association of America

      The bastards at GNAA created LMOS (Last Measure OS)
      http://sam.zoy.org/lmos/
      LMOS is a minimalist operating system targetting multimedia presentations, written with simplicity in mind. Due to its tiny x86 assembly core, it easily fits on a standard floppy: just write LMOS and your pictures to a CD or floppy, and it will boot and play on any IBM-PC compatible computer.

      LMOS is a handy tool to carry with you on a business card CD or an USB key. Also, instead of luring people to Last Measure mirrors or similar shock sites, you can simply hand them an LMOS CD with a "Knoppix" sticker on it.
      No matter what depravity you can think of, the Trolls have already been there and raped that idea.
      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    2. Re:Autoplay trojan? by Korin43 · · Score: 1

      I can't decide if that's horrible or awesome.

    3. Re:Autoplay trojan? by MrNonchalant · · Score: 1

      Except it wasn't autoplay. By the article's admission the users had to click through planted images and stumble across an executable masquerading as an image. There is no autoplay equivalent for USB flash drives.

    4. Re:Autoplay trojan? by idonthack · · Score: 1

      Yes, there is. Last time I used a friend's XP computer, I plugged in my flash drive and it asked if I wanted to run the executables on it, with a checkbox to do it automatically the next time.

      --
      Why is it that when you believe something it's an opinion, but when I believe something it's a manifesto?
    5. Re:Autoplay trojan? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      > The bastards at GNAA created LMOS (Last Measure OS)

      That, sir, is the funniest fucking thing I've ever seen on Slashdot, as well as the first time the GNAA has been on-topic at Slashdot.

      You win at teh Intarweb. Thanks to you, I've got my copy, as well as my Goatse Rescue Floppy.

      Now all I need to do is cat /dev/random to a few $15 USB keys and used floppies and leave 'em in the local Starfucks while humming DEVO's "That's Good!" in the back of my mind.

      I may not be as sick a bastard as the guy who thought this up. But like a penis bird, I stand perched on the penises of the sick bastards who've come before me.

      Everybody! It's a good thing!
      Everybody! Wants a good thing!
      Everybody! Ain't it true that
      Everybody's Lookin' for the same thing!
      Ain't it true, there's just no doubt,
      There's some things that you can do without,
      And that's good! (BOOM!)
      ... (BOOM!)
      ... (BOOM!)
      ... (BOOM!)

      Everybody's just like you, it's true!
      Everybody wants a good thing too!

      Now let's have a great big hand,
      For everybody who can understand,
      Life's a "B" - without a Buzz
      And let us not - forget to toast
      Everyone who might have missed the boat,
      And to everybody else who waits,
      Until the next one sails in again!

      Ain't it true, it's a monumental good thing. :)

    6. Re:Autoplay trojan? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      can't it be both?

    7. Re:Autoplay trojan? by Darby · · Score: 1

      I would've put autoplay Goatse on them, personally.

      That way you don't even have to have it mail out personal information to catch whoever falls for the scam.
      You'll have at least a week you can just wander the halls and look for that expression.

    8. Re:Autoplay trojan? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A substantial amount of those people seem to loosing their goatse virginity on a mac. Do mac users have somekind of sexual preoccupation with goatse? Either by going to goatse on their own machine, or they have loaded up goatse on their laptop then shown it to a "friend".

      This is the smoking gun that proves the goatse man is an apple user. He's probably Steve Jobs.

  10. Close those ports. by bubulubugoth · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I remember when was a "common practice" to remove or glue floppy disks at schools...

    But USB pose a different trouble. There ARE useful usb devices, like mouses and keyboards...

    And further more... there are phones and digital cameras, and even thos 5 in 1 memory readers that can be used to substract information or leak viruses...

    or even worse, specific purpouse programms, likt the used at the "audit"...

    And also one thing I wonder, is what Antivir was "protecting" the machine? Is nt antivir doing heuristics to look after strange things at the computer, like "something" trying to get the addressbook?

    --
    Â_Â
    1. Re:Close those ports. by ezwip · · Score: 0

      Either Nortons or McAffee would have been running. The guy says he has someone "write" the back door personally so the odds of Nortons or McAffee turning this up are pretty much "nill".

      --
      "I guess I'm gonna fade into Bolivian."
    2. Re:Close those ports. by airConditionedGypsy · · Score: 1
      And also one thing I wonder, is what Antivir was "protecting" the machine? Is nt antivir doing heuristics to look after strange things at the computer, like "something" trying to get the addressbook?

      Protecting against this type of attack really isn't an AV activity.

      Most consumer-level anit-virus software is simply doing misuse detection -- basically string or pattern matching on signatures. The other major category of anomaly-based detection...but this has a much higher false positive rate, even with extensive training. Some AV products perform anomaly detection based on sequences of system calls and other access patterns, but its fundamentally hard to distinguish malicious behavior from merely previously unseen behavior. For example, is having a newly installed Firefox instance access your bookmarks a malicious thing, or is it just a new, one-time use pattern?

      --
      I bootleg Fizzy Lifting Drinks.
    3. Re:Close those ports. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okay, you just put epoxy over every USB port on every computer. If there's something plugged in, put epoxy there anyway. Any computer with a USB mouse/keyboard will continue to work just fine, but no adding USB peripherals.

      Or just put the computer in a locked cabinet.

    4. Re:Close those ports. by BlueLightning · · Score: 1

      I think you can disable adding hardware using a group policy in Windows. Wouldn't that solve this issue?

    5. Re:Close those ports. by radish · · Score: 1

      Windows will let you enable USB HID (mice, keyboards) but keep everything else (MSC etc) disabled. At our office however we just block all USB and use PS2 keyboards.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    6. Re:Close those ports. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And we all know that the PS2.SYS device driver has 0 bugs.

      Mouse firmware is written to transmit legitimate PS/2 data packets. What will happen when a malformed packet hits that driver?

      Guesses anyone?

  11. But.. How? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I tried using something like this for my senior prank at school. I wanted to add a startup item that pointed to shutdown.exe on the XP systems. :)

    I simply could NOT get anything to autorun from any type of flash drive. Autorun.inf wouldn't run .vbs, .bat, .exe, or even .txt files. Nothing. How could they get it to autoinstall? I know there's U3 type stuff, but that creates a fake CD Rom drive due to a CDFS partition on the flash drive itself...

    How could they get the trojan to autorun on insert? And if you're picking crap up off the ground, why wouldn't you hold shift while plugging it in if you were running Win?

    1. Re:But.. How? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe they are full of shit. I find the story a little hard to believe.

    2. Re:But.. How? by dedazo · · Score: 1, Insightful
      They didn't, because it's not possible. No version of Windows supports Autorun from anything other than a CD. The only way to 'hack' a sort-of-Autorun that supports USB (or any other mass storage mounted media) is to write an application that monitors for the arrival of a device and then actually executes whatever autorun.inf points to. Of course that means you need prior access to the machine.

      So they must have had *some* sort of executable in there. User intervention is a requirement for this type attack to succeed. But given the ease with which people tend to get infected from zipped and password-protected email attachments it doesn't surprise me one bit that they ran an application in a USB thumb drive.

      The vast majority of Windows machines that are infected with something or other are in that state because of the user.

      --
      Web2.0: I love when people Flickr my cuil and digg my boingboing until my google is reddit and I start to yahoo
    3. Re:But.. How? by Architect_sasyr · · Score: 1

      What sort of crack are you smoking? Can I get some??

      No version of Windows supports Autorun from anything other than a CD

      Meanwhile, everytime I plug in my USB drive it loads up its own icon (via autorun.inf) and fires up my favourite music player (via autorun.inf and a batch file) whilst opening up explorer to point to my working directory (wow... autorun.inf)

      A little over-kill perhaps, but I am lazy^H^H^H^Hefficient and require this.


      Score -1 Flamebait...

      --
      Me failed English...
      FreeBSD over Linux. If my comments seem odd, this may explain...
    4. Re:But.. How? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or simply name your .vbs/.bat/.exe/.[whatever] something like, "Don't click this program" or "Don't look here". That will basically get at least 75% or more people to do it anyway. :-)

    5. Re:But.. How? by jim3e8 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, if you had read the article, you would know the "autorun" is not done by Windows, but by "humans' innate curiosity" about files named things like anna_kournikova.scr. In other words, they clicked on the other images preplanted on the drive, and then on the virus. Really, it's spelled out in the article, and it is clear that many never clicked through the summary, as usual.

    6. Re:But.. How? by dedazo · · Score: 1
      • If the partition on the USB drive is marked as bootable then you will get a dialog asking you what you want to do with the contents of the drive when you plug it in.
      • You might have a media handler (in XP) defined for that particular USB port and device ID.
      • You might have a resident application that does what I described earlier. For example, I think I remember Creative shipping something like that with the older Muvos.

      But in plain vanilla XP this won't work. Much less in W2K, which does not have a concept of "media handlers".

      Can I get some??

      No, looks like you're already OD'ed on it.

      --
      Web2.0: I love when people Flickr my cuil and digg my boingboing until my google is reddit and I start to yahoo
    7. Re:But.. How? by forkazoo · · Score: 1
      They didn't, because it's not possible. No version of Windows supports Autorun from anything other than a CD.

      Not especially useful, but you could autorun from a harddrive in Win95. Not especially useful, but it was easy enough. Double clicking on the drive letter would do whatever you wanted, instead of opening it in Explorer. Of course, it wasn't much of a security concern, as you would have had to have pretty intimate access to a machine to install a hard drive in it, anyway...
    8. Re:But.. How? by EvilSS · · Score: 4, Informative

      That is 100% incorrect. USB drives (and ANY removable drive including usb/firewire hard drives) can be used for autorun. Most likely the reason the parent could not get it to autorun is because autorun had been turned off.

      If you want a great example of autorun look at Pass2Go from the Roboform guys. It sets up autorun on the USB drive it is installed on. The Microsoft wireless network setup wizard (the one the also exports the WEP/WPA keys of an existing connection on an XP machine as plain text) also sets up a USB key to autorun the wizard.

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
    9. Re:But.. How? by radicalnerd · · Score: 1
      from article:

      people started plugging the USB drives in, scouring through the planted image files, then unknowingly running our piece of software.
    10. Re:But.. How? by dedazo · · Score: 1
      can be used for autorun

      With a driver, yes. With a custom media handler, yes. With a resident app, yes. There's even a whole cottage industry of little apps out there that will do that for you given you part with $19.99 or whatever. But out of the box XP does NOT support USB autorun. I'm not asserting that it is impossible to create an Autorun-like effect from a USB drive, just that it is not something that's part of Windows' default behavior.

      How hard is it to understand that?

      In this case I doubt a bunch of computers in a credit union had something like that already running, though I suppose it's possible.

      --
      Web2.0: I love when people Flickr my cuil and digg my boingboing until my google is reddit and I start to yahoo
    11. Re:But.. How? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a retard. XP will autorun from any storage device that gives an insertion/hotplug event by default. Ditto for 2K. By default.

      I've deployed hundreds of various Windows boxes, I would know. You don't know shit.

    12. Re:But.. How? by a.d.trick · · Score: 1

      Windows may not do autorun, but it does have some terrible interface bugs that make it difficult for users to tell what is safe and what is not. First is the ability for files to automatically execute code based on they're names (the file extention more specifially). The second is that by default it hides this critical piece of information by default. I also allows executble files to assign themself icons. So I can create an I love you.exe file with an MS Word logo and 99.9% of users won't be able to tell the difference.

      So yes, this is partly the fault of the users, but it is primarly a user interface bug — and a bad one at that.

    13. Re:But.. How? by advs89 · · Score: 0

      Or better yet, you make the following msdos batch file and run from any pc on network: :beginning tsshutdn /server:[computername] tsshutdn /server:[othercomputername] tsshutdn /server:[anothercomputername] goto :beginning This would require you knowing the names of the computers, but is quite effective.

      --
      Rirelobql xabjf gung EBG-13 vf gur yrnfg frpher rapelcgvba rire, ohg jbhyq lbh jnfgr lbhe gvzr npghnyyl qrpelcgvat vg???
    14. Re:But.. How? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That has absolutely nothing to do with what I said.

      Install XP onto a fresh brand new box. Assuming the USB host device is properly recognized, insert a fucking USB memory stick. Put some autorun shit on it. It runs.

      Thanks, you lose. Again.

    15. Re:But.. How? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure. But manually creating autorun.inf didn't work on any of my 3 systems, nor my friends' systems. We were stumped.

    16. Re:But.. How? by EvilSS · · Score: 1

      Try it. Setup Autorun on a USB disk and plug it into a fresh XP SP2 machine and see what happens.

      I do agree that most likely (hopefully) a credit union would have autorun disabled on their PC's and most likely the employees just started opening files on the disk.

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
    17. Re:But.. How? by NMerriam · · Score: 1

      They didn't, because it's not possible. No version of Windows supports Autorun from anything other than a CD.

      I've been developing CD-ROMs and DVDs for several years, and I assure you, based on doing it thousands of times for development and testing, that XP can happily autorun a hard drive, an optical drive, a USB drive, and a network drive. Most of those it doesn't do by default (they can be turned on in the registry), but optical drives and some USB devices can and DO autorun by default on XP systems.

      --
      Recursive: Adj. See Recursive.
    18. Re:But.. How? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Q: What must I do to trigger Autorun on my USB storage device?
      The Autorun capabilities are restricted to CD-ROM drives and fixed disk drives.

    19. Re:But.. How? by SoSueMe · · Score: 1

      "But in plain vanilla XP this won't work. "

      And you base this on what? Vast amounts of empirical data?

      New, Plain, off the shelf, Big Box, retail machines make everything "easy".
      Pop in a "Kingston Data Traveler" or a "Lexar JumpDrive" and XP is more than happy to recognize it.
      Heck, XP even offers to display the contents of the device.

      You and I know to deny such offerings but, in the "Click OK to Continue" culture, this is not he norm.

    20. Re:But.. How? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I tried using something like this for my senior prank at school.

      A better prank is to rearrange a few keys on the keyboard. Then, change the keyboard mapping so that the new keys are "correct". Simple, but confusing to all those after you...

    21. Re:But.. How? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      And the VERY next sentence:

      If you need to make a USB storage device perform Autorun, the device must not be marked as a removable media device and the device must contain an Autorun.inf file and a startup application.

      If you had actually read the link, you'd see that changing the SCSI Inquiry RMB result will enable Autorun to work.

    22. Re:But.. How? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, my aunt Martha does that to all her computers. Fucktard.

    23. Re:But.. How? by jim3e8 · · Score: 1

      Exactly--they thought the file, which misrepresented itself, was something (cool image, company salaries) it was not. They clicked on it and in doing so, unknowingly ran a Trojan. That is why the article compared this technique to email virus distribution, where you are tricked into running a malicious program. (For our purposes we are ignoring the Outlook virus "autorun" "feature".)

    24. Re:But.. How? by gaspyy · · Score: 1

      The best autorun is human curiosity.

      They didn't autorun, they simply made a bunch of executable with enticing names - I'd guess something like UndressMe.exe would do the trick :-)

    25. Re:But.. How? by Dahan · · Score: 1

      It pops up a dialog that says, "Windows can perform the same action each time you insert a disk or connect a device with this kind of file: Program" "What do you want Windows to do?" "Open folder to view files with Windows Explorer" "Take no action". That's not autorun. Autorun is when it executes the program automatically. You know--without asking what I want to do.

    26. Re:But.. How? by OnceWasLurker · · Score: 0

      If you think you can't get away with a regular usb stick (i.e. if some admin somewhere grew a neuron), just leave a CD - one of them small ones if necessary, with "18th party stripper pics" written on it... /e logs out, googles for group policy autorun disable

      --
      Mmmmm... I'm sure you have an invalid iterator there somewhere.
    27. Re:But.. How? by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      So how long has your school been using Mac's?

    28. Re:But.. How? by ratboy666 · · Score: 1

      Simple enough

      1 - Rely on social engineering (easy, works well)

      2 - Hack USB stick to flip removable bit. (More difficult, but easy enough). Combine with (1) for
      extra attack points.

      3 - DIY USB stick. This one is custom. Easy enough -- the engineering would only cost 5 to 10K. This one is a USB stick, with extra logic to trigger DMA through USB, and potentially rooting x86 systems WITHOUT being visable at all. Hardware for this: cheap, software: can be as creative as you want to go.

      Given that (1) worked 15 out of 20, it isn't even worth exploring 2 and 3, But that's just my opinion. I defend against all three possible attacks:

      USB is limited to keyboard/mouse and storage ON AN X SERVER. Since the X server is booted from R/O media and doesn't have local disk, a rootkit generally doesn't matter. Nor does "auto exec" and double clicking a trojan doesn't work.

      An attack is still possible, but the user would need to copy the file, make it executable, and run it.

      YMMV

      Ratboy

      --
      Just another "Cubible(sic) Joe" 2 17 3061
    29. Re:But.. How? by dedazo · · Score: 1

      Sweet father of mercy, what the hell is wrong with you people? That is NOT "autorun", period!

      --
      Web2.0: I love when people Flickr my cuil and digg my boingboing until my google is reddit and I start to yahoo
  12. Done before? by gasmonso · · Score: 1

    Since the users were required to actually execute something on the usb stick, couldn't this have been done years ago on floppies? Clever, kinda... but not new is my guess.

    http://psychicfreaks.com/
    1. Re:Done before? by MustardMan · · Score: 1, Informative

      It could have been done on CDs, but not floppies. Autorun.inf doesn't do anything on a floppy.

      The difference here, of course, is that a USB stick is something someone would be likely to keep to use themselves. A burned CD isn't nearly as appealing.

    2. Re:Done before? by quanticle · · Score: 1

      Floppies don't autoplay like USB drives do. So, yes, this could have been done with floppy drives, but it would have taken more user intervention.

      --
      We all know what to do, but we don't know how to get re-elected once we have done it
    3. Re:Done before? by Above · · Score: 1

      I think the burned CD can be made much more appealing via a $0.30 sharpie....

      "Pam Anderson Sex Video"

      "WoW cheats"

      " home videos"

      I'm sure there are many more possibilities...

    4. Re:Done before? by Tired+and+Emotional · · Score: 2, Informative

      They used to on Macs. That was one reason Macs were so vulnerable to viruses back in the eighties. Evey file could have a resources fork and the machine would load and execute the resources on any disk you inserted. As a result mac viruses were a major problem - and this was before machines were networked.

      --
      Squirrel!
    5. Re:Done before? by kfg · · Score: 1

      Sure. It's been done before on every type of media you can name. The only thing that's "new" in this is the actual observation of the human behavior, people running things that they just found lying around, even when they knew they were in the middle of a security audit.

      It's not exactly news that people are idiots either, but every now and then you have to hold up an example to remind them. . .until they forget. . .again.

      KFG

    6. Re:Done before? by Mantle · · Score: 1

      I disagree. This is a social engineering attack. Years ago the social conditions would not support this type of attack-- people don't know what floppies are, how to access the data on them from a computer, or even have computers readily available. Nowadays everyone knows (and likes to have) USB keys, how to use them, and have computers all around the workplace, in the public, and at home.

    7. Re:Done before? by ross.w · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, but when floppies were more common, it was also common to have PCs set up to boot from the floppy first and only boot from the hard disk if the floppy isn't there.

      There was a whole genre of viruses including the Pakistani Brain virus, that take advantage of took advantage of this, plus the tendency of people to forget to take their floppy out of the PC when turning it on. They would silently run the code hidden in the boot sector, which would infect the boot sector of the HDD and ensure that every floppy inserted from then on got the virus. At some predetermined time, the virus would release its payload.

      The most vulnerable machines were the ones with multiple random users (especially schools and universities), and in the days before the internet, people were far more inclined to store their files on a floppy and take it with them.

      --
      If my call is important, why am I talking to a recording?
    8. Re:Done before? by Maximum+Prophet · · Score: 1

      USB thumbdrives are cool. Much more so than floppies. Their also more tolerant of gunk. If I had found an errant floppy years ago, I might have sent it to the lost and found, but I wouldn't have put it in my disk drive, because it would probably have dust and crude on it. If I were to find a USB thumb drive, I might think to mount it to find the owner.

      After this article, if I see a thumbdrive on the ground, I'm going to pick it up with forceps and put in into a plastic bag so as not to disturb any fingerprints on it. Then send it to the FBI for analysis.

      --
      All ideas^H^H^H^H^Hprocesses in this post are Patent Pending. (as well as the process of patenting all postings)
  13. Through the front door by Billosaur · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You've probably seen the experiments where users can be conned into giving up their passwords for a chocolate bar or a $1 bill. But this little giveaway took those a step further, working off humans' innate curiosity. Emailed virus writers exploit this same vulnerability, as do phishers and their clever faux Websites. Our credit union client wasn't unique or special. All the technology and filtering and scanning in the world won't address human nature. But it remains the single biggest open door to any company's secrets.

    There you have it -- invest in fancy firewalls, make people change their passwords every 90 days, filter email from spam, phish, virii, and trojans, and then sit back and watch as your employees bypass all those lovely defenses and lay your system vulnerable.

    I've said it before: there's no use building a wall, firing up the boiling oil, and digging a moat and filling it with sharks if you're going to build an 8-lane superhighway through it. Companies are trying to crack down, but the myriad ways that information can get stolen or transferred from a system are enourmous. USB drives, camera phones, MP3 players -- anything that can store data is a potential point of vulnerability, one which a company will be hard pressed to monitor or control. Couple that with this sudden rash of stolen laptops carrying unencrypted and often sensitive data, and the there's no reason for hackers to work too hard any more, when they can just have data handed to them.

    --
    GetOuttaMySpace - The Anti-Social Network
    1. Re:Through the front door by NMerriam · · Score: 1

      I've said it before: there's no use building a wall, firing up the boiling oil, and digging a moat and filling it with sharks...

      Wow, that you've said that even once is an indication you need to find a better architect!

      --
      Recursive: Adj. See Recursive.
    2. Re:Through the front door by feronti · · Score: 1

      At my employer (an unnamed aerospace/defense contractor), the policy is no electronic devices that haven't been approved by Security. Granted, once they're approved (which basically means putting a non-asset tag on them) they don't seem to inspect them on their way out... at least not if you don't have clearance for anything other than proprietary data. 'Course I decided that it wasn't worth the hassle to even try to get something approved, since I've only worked there a month, so what I know of the policy is what I heard in the 1 hour security briefing on my first day... I figure, as long as I don't bring anything in or out, I don't have anything to worry about.

    3. Re:Through the front door by bwcbwc · · Score: 1

      The irony is that the companies are also dependent on that big superhighway going through their front door. It's how they communicate with their suppliers, competitors, allies and customers. People carry laptops around to do their presentations now, not huge portfolios of transparencies. People work at home because companies assign work that requires 50-100 hours a week to complete. Every packet or disk sector that enters or leaves the companies network in the course of daily business could be the one that brings the whole system down.

      But it takes the human factor to really fsck things up. That's why social engineering is so effective. The routers and firewalls operate with their inflexible rules and it takes a code defect to get through them without additional support. But humans can be persuaded to violate their own rules by methods ranging from bribery to blackmail.

      --
      We are the 198 proof..
  14. Smart idea!! by Cybersonic · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I have to admit, this had me laughing out loud! :) I do security audits often, and I know this 'attack' would work almost anywhere.

    Add this to your weekly 'security' email/meeting as I have a feeling this may happen a bit more often now...

    --
    Cybie! aka Ralph Bonnell
  15. Nice socal engineering. by Boap · · Score: 2, Insightful

    However it is simply solved by disabling the USB ports either physically or via the registery which they should have been in the first place.

    1. Re:Nice socal engineering. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Except that many new machines (especially Dells) have no legacy keyboard/mice ports on them. So disabling USB renders the computer useless.

    2. Re:Nice socal engineering. by FirstTimeCaller · · Score: 4, Interesting

      At WinHec this year, Microsoft reported that many companies were using glue guns(!) to secure their networks against USB drives. They then went on to claim that Vista will make this unnecessary (as well as curing world hunger and making you look thin in those pants...)

      --
      Wanted: witty unique signature. Must be willing to relocate.
    3. Re:Nice socal engineering. by kailoran · · Score: 1

      Some BIOSes have a setting called "Disable USB Mass Storage". Mine does; it was _ON_ by default (!). Took me a while to figure out why the hell Windows bluescreened whenever I plugged in a thumbdrive.

    4. Re:Nice socal engineering. by robfoo · · Score: 1

      And car crashes wouldn't happen if we didn't have cars.

      As has been pointed out in numerous other posts, this type of 'attack' is not limited to USB - you could do it with CDs, floppy disks, whatever. Are you going to disable CD and floppy drives?

      As with car crashes, the best approach is user education.

    5. Re:Nice socal engineering. by HaloZero · · Score: 1

      Not always so simple. Most newer desktop computers no longer come with PS2 ports (I'm speaking from experience with new Dell Desktops here, as I deploy them for my company). Their only input interfaces are USB these days.

      --
      Informatus Technologicus
    6. Re:Nice socal engineering. by radish · · Score: 1

      Are you going to disable CD and floppy drives?

      Of course, why not? In fact better yet, just take them out. Totally unneeded in a modern office environment.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    7. Re:Nice socal engineering. by Simon+Donkers · · Score: 1

      Holding shift while plugggin in a specially crafted USB device will overrule autorun. Normal USB sticks have autorun already disabled. So if you don't run any .exe, .scr files or simular after that you are pretty safe.
      That is, unless they find out how to combine Sony Rootkits and USB devices.

    8. Re:Nice socal engineering. by Fire+Dragon · · Score: 1

      Of course, why not? In fact better yet, just take them out. Totally unneeded in a modern office environment.

      And keyboards, with those users can type in something insecure when "this nice guy from helpdesk/support" calls to test something.

      For outside attacks you can defend yourself with firewalls and software restrictions.

      For social engineering you can only take cautions by educating people.

    9. Re:Nice socal engineering. by rbochan · · Score: 1

      I'm afraid _nothing_ will make me look thin in these pants :o(

      --
      ...Rob
      The American Dream isn't an SUV and a house in the suburbs; it's Don't Tread On Me.
    10. Re:Nice socal engineering. by radish · · Score: 1

      You can never block all attack vectors, but that doesn't mean you shouldn't block those you can. Sure education helps, but it's not an either/or situation - we can educate _and_ minimize opportunity.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    11. Re:Nice socal engineering. by punkr0x · · Score: 1
      Most of my problem users can't even find their usb ports. One guy did and somehow managed to break all 3 of them (he must have been trying to plug in every piece of crap he found on the floor, not just limiting himself to USB devices)!

      Glue guns? So Vista will eliminate the need for permanently destroying your USB ports by crashing every time you plug in a USB device! Excellent, I'm glad microsoft realizes that letting companies glue their security holes shut is a bad idea...

    12. Re:Nice socal engineering. by Sigg3.net · · Score: 0

      It is simply solved by people not peeking into other people's USB sticks.
      If you opened my letter, and it contained anthrax, you couldn't blame the manufacturers of the glue.

  16. I wonder... by EmperorKagato · · Score: 1

    I'm going to try this with CDs.

    Tomorrow's hottest slashdot article may feature my "tests"

    --
    ----- You know you have ego issues when you register a domain in your name.
    1. Re:I wonder... by Hannah+E.+Davis · · Score: 1

      I doubt CDs would work as well, if only because the average computer-worker's first reaction upon seeing a "lost" CD is to fling it at something. Especially if it's found without its case (or in a broken case), most people will assume that it's scratched beyond recovery -- or at least, that's what they'll say if anyone asks why they're using it as a frisbee instead of seeing what's on it.

    2. Re:I wonder... by wordsofwisedumb · · Score: 1
      That would probably work the best if it were burned all the way full so there was no visible burn line, then placed in a stack of empty CDs and given away as blank media.

      The other option would be labeling it as popular music, the latest movie release, or porn.

    3. Re:I wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too late, SONY beat you to that trick.

    4. Re:I wonder... by jsm300 · · Score: 1

      Well another way to increase the chances of the CD being inserted would be to use a "silver" CD-R (ones that look the closest to mass produced CD-ROMs) with an inkject compatible blank white coating. Use a high quality CD inkjet printer (e.g. Primera) and print a design that is likely to tempt people. One example might be a "Best of Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Issues" using content from the Sports Illustrated website for the design. The suggestion above to "fill" the CD so that there won't be any burn line is also a good one. Note, I don't in any way condone such actions, but just want to make people think about what could be done, so that they are a little more cautious about inserting random CD's into their computers. I've turned off autoplay for my CD drives just in case.

    5. Re:I wonder... by johnny+cashed · · Score: 1

      I believe Sony beat you to it.

    6. Re:I wonder... by Cyberscythe · · Score: 1

      I think it would be an even better idea if you tried it with laptops. Just go to the Toronto area and leave a few dozen scattered across my neighbourhood. You'd better get some of the newer models, in order to entice people even more into hooking it into their network.

      Oh, and don't get Compaqs. I hate Compaq.

  17. Whew. Thank heavens my Credit Union is safe! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They run NT 4. :)

  18. Black Hat Hazards! by redelm · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Wasn't some dude prosecuted for doing Black Hat ops, even though he was hired specifically to evaluate security?

    Before I'd even think of something like this, I'd want signed original 8.5x11 floppies giving me explicit authorization to attack^Hevaluate systems like this.

    Even then, the DHS might come after the evaluators or possession and willful use of destructive tools.

    1. Re:Black Hat Hazards! by RobertLTux · · Score: 1

      chapter 0 of the"pen testers handbook" states (among other things)
      Make sure you have a Written document that is signed by an authoritative person (or persons) detailing that you have permission to perform any "hacking" operations (detailing what and on what is permitted)
      this is known as your "GET OUT OF JAIL FREE CARD"

      (i mean really evey book ive seen (includes hacking for dummies!!) has this info mostly with the GOOJFC called exactly that.)

      --
      Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
  19. Pfft.... by 1053r · · Score: 1

    I'll say this at a risk of sounding like a severe linux fanboy, but... Linux users had this solved a long time ago. Just edit /etc/fstab to not allow normal users to do any mounting (I mean, besides the obvious fact that Linux can't run windows binaries, thus eliminating all the worms and trojans, as well as any other malware you can name). Please, people, just move to linux and your automount/autorun problems will be all solved! No complicated solutions involving proprietary registry editors, just call up vi or emacs, even ed will do the job! If you use OpenBSD, you can even encrypt your swap partitons! (don't know if this exists for other os's too). Old news: window's isn't secure (yet). Having retard employees who pop in anything they find on the street into their computer doesn't help.

    1. Re:Pfft.... by Sinryc · · Score: 1

      It IS Open source... Someone could just write one for linux. :-D

      --
      Yay, I have a sig.
    2. Re:Pfft.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is it with Linux users who think UNIX never existed and that everything Linux copied/implemented in its clone of UNIX was somehow the first implementation of it?

    3. Re:Pfft.... by 0racle · · Score: 1

      mount(8) isn't the only way to access media, and a lot of others do not require root.

      --
      "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
    4. Re:Pfft.... by Vraylle · · Score: 5, Funny
      "Just edit /etc/fstab to not allow normal users to do any mounting..."


      People that are geeky enough to be able to /etc/fstab a Linux system probably aren't doing much mounting either.

      --
      Mutant Freaks of Nature: "Frighteningly Addictive"
    5. Re:Pfft.... by PlusFiveTroll · · Score: 1

      Um, maybe if your system security sucks or you have 777 fever.

      chown root.root /dev/whaterverdevice
      chmod 770 /dev/whateverdevice

      Unless you know something I don't, its going to be really hard to get to the media.

    6. Re:Pfft.... by Ph33r+th3+g(O)at · · Score: 1

      Hey! I resemble that remark!

      --
      I too have felt the cold finger of injustice.
    7. Re:Pfft.... by radish · · Score: 1

      FUD. You can do the same thing in Windows, it's just the lazy admins didn't. What makes you think they'd me any more diligent with a different OS installed? And how on earth is editing fstab any less complicated than firing up the security policy manager and unclicking a few check boxes?

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    8. Re:Pfft.... by Mark+Clegg · · Score: 0

      Please, people, just move to linux and your automount/autorun problems will be all solved

      This wouldn't solve the problem, The only reason that all the trojans etc run under windows is because it's so prelevant. If everybody moved to Linux, don't you think the virus writers would too?

      There's a very fine line to be maintained, between allowing people enough access to do their jobs, and restricing access to anything else. - There will always be a grey area between the two that somebody will find a way to exploit.

    9. Re:Pfft.... by Fire+Dragon · · Score: 1

      I'll say this at a risk of sounding like a severe linux fanboy, but...

      You sound like a severe linux fanboy, but...

      I like playing around with linux at home, but in work I rely on Windows.

      What is the difference between having policy on disabling automounts in linux with etc/fstab and doing same thing with Windows?
      All you need to have is your IT policies set on the required security rules. This goes for both Linux and Windows.

      If your Linux security suck on corporate level, you can have very insecure system.

      No complicated solutions involving proprietary registry editors, just call up vi or emacs, even ed will do the job!
      Or just open AD and create corporate wide Group policy that get applied to every user when they log on next time.

      Securing Windows enviroments isn't that difficult on most cases. Yes, there are a lot of vulnerabilities on Windows, but many of them can be handled with limited user access, firewalls, group policies and so on.

      Windows doesn't lack means to secure system, corporations lack professional IT managers to make use of those means.

      Home systems are totally different, Windows home versions out-of-box suck, but enough default installations of Linux could be almost as dangerous.

  20. If They Were Running Linux... by dduardo · · Score: 2, Informative

    If they were running Linux the solution would be easy: disable USB Mass Storage in the kernel. USB mice and keyboards will still work, but they won't be able to read their thumb drives.

    1. Re:If They Were Running Linux... by Pizaz · · Score: 1

      Huh? What about cdroms? What about floppy disks? I think the point is, if a user finds a data disk of any format, they might try to see what is on the disk. Further, by filling the disk with seemingly legitimate user data (image files, documents, spreadsheets, then when they come across a binary or script, they are going to be very inclined to TRUST IT).

    2. Re:If They Were Running Linux... by dduardo · · Score: 1

      You can disable those in the kernel too. The point is that there are ways to prevent stupid users from doing stupid things. If the admins are smart they will setup a policy where these type of things can't happen. Just as an example, if I was developing a the client infrastructure for a bank branch I would build a stripped down gentoo install with the bare necesities that I could easily image on all the client computers. All updates are done through the local network. Computers can only join the network if their mac address matches and they provide the correct credentials. Clients don't have access to the internet. Clients don't get text based passwords but biometric finger print passwords. If your extra paranoid you could even put those polorizing screens on the monitors so only the person sitting right in front can see what is on the screen.

    3. Re:If They Were Running Linux... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they were running Linux the solution would be easy: disable USB Mass Storage in the kernel.

      Two mouse clicks and you're done! Easy!

      Face it: "easy" and "Linux" do not belong in any sentence uttered by, about, or near any normal-level computer user.

    4. Re:If They Were Running Linux... by radish · · Score: 1

      Why just Linux? Windows lets you do the exact same thing.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

  21. Good effort by mnemonic_ · · Score: 1

    but poor execution.

  22. It screams: UNPATCHED by redelm · · Score: 0
    This is mildly interesting, but not because the____ employees did anything wrong. It points out that__ the sysadmins have been keeping horribly unpatched_ systems around that could be infected by data. And old exploits, at that.

    __________________________ Examining data should not lead to altering other___ data. Still less system files. Microsoft is a____ crufty bugfest. Nothing more to see here ... move along.

  23. Re:It screams: UNPATCHED by Deviant+Q · · Score: 1

    No, this isn't something that patches would fix. I could easily write a program that has no visible effect---or perhaps pops up a funny picture/animatin or something---that, in the background, uses the administrative privileges it runs with by default to do lots of exciting things. Heck, even without admin privileges I could execute the idea from a few threads up (sticking a shortcut to shutdown.exe in the user's startup folder). It has nothing to do with patches: once the user runs my program, it's all over, no matter how patched they are.

    WTFSM is with the underscores?

    --
    "May the days be aimless. Let the seasons drift. Do not advance the action according to a plan."
  24. Interesting Idea by vandalman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The first thing I do when I find a USB stick is to plug it in and open up documents to see who's it is. I mostly find them around campus, so a name on a paper lets me do a school directory look up. Shame to think I could get a virus from trying to help someone out, good idea and interesting application of USB sticks.

    --
    Devise, Repair, Solve, Build
    1. Re:Interesting Idea by Sloppy · · Score: 1
      Shame to think I could get a virus from trying to help someone out
      Except that actually, you still can't, provided you're a computer nerd, and therefore know the difference between looking at stuff, versus executing stuff.

      The catch is that MS Windows has a confusing UI where looking and executing are performed the same way (click on a file), so that OS should probably only be used by experts. Paradoxically, that OS tends to be used mostly by non-experts. Oops!

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    2. Re:Interesting Idea by Ihlosi · · Score: 1
      Except that actually, you still can't, provided you're a computer nerd, and therefore know the difference between looking at stuff, versus executing stuff.



      Yes you can, provided that you "look at" more than just directory and file names.



      If you open any documents, you are effectively "executing" stuff - not directly (code that runs on your processor), but indirectly (document contents are interpretet by the application you use to "look at" them). An attacker who know security holes in the application you are likely to use can hide malicious code in a perfectly harmless-looking document (bitmaps, anyone ?).

    3. Re:Interesting Idea by OnceWasLurker · · Score: 0

      But, you don't do this as a user in the enterprise admins group, do you?

      No, of course not... more likely domain administrator itself, right? :)

      <mumbles> dot dot dot /dev/null
      All you need to know: http://www.leo.org/information/freizeit/fun/bofh/b ofh1.html

      --
      Mmmmm... I'm sure you have an invalid iterator there somewhere.
    4. Re:Interesting Idea by nblender · · Score: 1
      Are you insane?

      Mount them on a virtual machine and use "strings" or "cat -v".

      Prophylactic computing.

    5. Re:Interesting Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      open up documents to see who's it is. I mostly find them around campus

      How'd you get to college without knowing how to spell a five letter word? "Who's" is a contraction for "who is". "Whose" is the word you're looking for (and not "the word your looking for")

      Whoever invented the spell checker needs a good bitch slapping. Do you dumbass kids realize how incredibly stupid you look? Why is it that there are so many semiliterates at a "news for nerds" site?

    6. Re:Interesting Idea by vandalman · · Score: 1

      Good catch

      --
      Devise, Repair, Solve, Build
    7. Re:Interesting Idea by Jetson · · Score: 1
      The first thing I do when I find a USB stick is to plug it in and open up documents to see who's it is. I mostly find them around campus, so a name on a paper lets me do a school directory look up. Shame to think I could get a virus from trying to help someone out, good idea and interesting application of USB sticks.

      I was thinking the same thing. When I was on vacation I found a 1Gb SD card lying on the floor of a crowded ferry. Assuming it was from a digital camera, I put it straight into my PDA so I could look at the pictures and maybe see a face I recognized so I could find the owner. After all, I know *I* would appreciate not losing a whole day's worth of photographs.

      While an SD card is not effective as an attack vector (the PDA doesn't perform auto-run), I would probably have done the same thing if I was carrying a laptop and found a USB drive, simply because a ferry ride is time-limited and it would be virtually impossible to find the owner after the ferry docked.

      The bottom line is that this bit of social engineering works because it's new and (potentially) plays on people's desire to be helpful even if they aren't greedy or nosy.

  25. Re:It screams: UNPATCHED by Yosho · · Score: 1

    Why does it scream "unpatched" to you? Did you read the article? The computers weren't infected by old exploits -- they were infected by a Trojan that had been custom-written for the job. No patch or anti-virus software is going to detect a Trojan that's never been seen before. It's really pretty easy to write a little program that will autorun when Windows mounts a drive.

    Furthermore, why do you put so many underscores in random places in your post?

    --
    Karma: Terrifying (mostly affected by atrocities you've committed)
  26. And the other 5 trojan drives went where? by ChaseTec · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The scattered 20 trojan drives around the outside and 15 get picked up by their target. Notice how the don't bother saying what happened to the other 5. Did they not get used, not get found, found by other people? And you know some of those employees took the drives home and their personal information was captured. Yes it's a cool hack but unless the trojan was coded to only execute on machines with a certain MAC address it was ethically wrong.

    --
    My Hello World is 512 bytes. But it's also a valid Fat12 boot sector, Fat12 file reader, and Pmode routine.
    1. Re:And the other 5 trojan drives went where? by EvanED · · Score: 1

      This is out of my ass but I would guess since they kept tabs on what happened to each of them and conducted surveillance that they would have been on the lookout for other people snagging them. I would also think that it wouldn't be that hard to, at the end of the day, say "hey guys, those USB drives? we need them back."

      Though the article should probably have said.

    2. Re:And the other 5 trojan drives went where? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They could've easily hashed the sensitive data, and send it out. That would allow them to verify success without compromising the data.

    3. Re:And the other 5 trojan drives went where? by PCM2 · · Score: 1
      The scattered 20 trojan drives around the outside and 15 get picked up by their target. Notice how the don't bother saying what happened to the other 5.


      According to TFA, of the 20 they planted, 15 were found by employees. I think that pretty much sums it up.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    4. Re:And the other 5 trojan drives went where? by Jack9 · · Score: 2

      Yes it's a cool hack but unless the trojan was coded to only execute on machines with a certain MAC address it was ethically wrong.

      I believe that's a perverted ethical viewpoinnt. The thumbdrives were obtained unethically and you cannot hold OTHERS ethically responsible for any potential damage. Is it unethical to leave a pencil out, knowing a child could grab it and stab themselves in the eye? Yes it's probably unethical to knowingly put a candy wrapper around a laxative (ok, that was me) on a playground, but in America, the idea of personal responsibility for adults (especially a bank) exists.

      --

      Often wrong but never in doubt.
      I am Jack9.
      Everyone knows me.
    5. Re:And the other 5 trojan drives went where? by idonthack · · Score: 1
      The thumbdrives were obtained unethically...
      They may have just been opening them up to see who the drive belogned to so they could return it.
      --
      Why is it that when you believe something it's an opinion, but when I believe something it's a manifesto?
    6. Re:And the other 5 trojan drives went where? by R2.0 · · Score: 1

      The file they opened was labeled "MyWifePics.exe" or similar.

      Option 1: The good samaritans were hoping to identify the drive's owner by recognizing an identifying birthmark on his wife's ass.

      Option #2: "Hey - I just found a $50 jump drive. And it already has porn on it - BONUS!"

      The liklihood of each option is left as an exercise for the reader.

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    7. Re:And the other 5 trojan drives went where? by Jack9 · · Score: 1

      They may have just been opening them up to see who the drive belogned to so they could return it.

      That's what I said about the last safe I found.

      --

      Often wrong but never in doubt.
      I am Jack9.
      Everyone knows me.
    8. Re:And the other 5 trojan drives went where? by Maximum+Prophet · · Score: 1

      Um, someone like, say, the bank's customers!!!

      Yeoch, the libility to the bank is resolved because they were hired by the bank, and I presume have a written agreement with them, but what if another companies employee happend by, picked one up, and was hacked. They could be in a world of hurt, both civilly and criminally.

      --
      All ideas^H^H^H^H^Hprocesses in this post are Patent Pending. (as well as the process of patenting all postings)
    9. Re:And the other 5 trojan drives went where? by azuretek · · Score: 1

      Thumb drives are fairly cheap, if it's your workplace you'd assume one of your coworkers lost it. I'd attempt to return it if I found it around the office, why would you hold on to something cheap that might belong to someone you know? You might bring it in one day and a coworker would say "Hey that's mine" that would be awkward, not to mention everyone would think you're a theif.

    10. Re:And the other 5 trojan drives went where? by Jack9 · · Score: 1

      It wouldn't necessarily be ethical to attempt to find the owner if there is a lost and found procedure (in a US bank where scraps of personal information are a potential LIABILITY, this is part of the audit). Either way, picking up the thumb drive and accessing the information are a series of unethical acts. Expecting people to act in a proper manner, is not unethical. Trying to safeguard people from their own inpropriety, is a pointless slippery slope.

      --

      Often wrong but never in doubt.
      I am Jack9.
      Everyone knows me.
    11. Re:And the other 5 trojan drives went where? by gfreeman · · Score: 1

      Far from it. All it says is that 15 were found by employees. It says nothing about the other 5, which is what the GP was asking. Were they not picked up at all, or were they picked up by members of the public? If the latter, did that jeopardise the private data of the (potentially) 5 non-employees who found the USB drives?

      Not saying that's what happened, but the question goes unanswered.

      --
      Ceci n'est pas un sig.
    12. Re:And the other 5 trojan drives went where? by necro2607 · · Score: 1

      "The thumbdrives were obtained unethically and you cannot hold OTHERS ethically responsible for any potential damage."

      Sure you can.. whether the USB memory sticks were purchased, stolen or gifts from someone, the people who stashed the memory sticks are still fully liable for any laws broken. Consider that they placed the memory sticks there for the sole purpose of having the scripts run and transmit peoples' passwords/personal info etc. if, as was *fully expected*, people would grab the memory sticks and plug them into their PCs.

      It's like the whole deal where if someone breaks into your house but they fall and get injured they can sue you - just because someone was breaking the law (stealing your stuff) doesn't make it okay for you to cause injury to him/her (whether intentional or not).

    13. Re:And the other 5 trojan drives went where? by WeeBit · · Score: 1

      I don't believe this is ethically wrong. Fact is that if your stupid enough to pick it up and take it home with you, then your deserving of getting infected. I don't believe they would admit to taking it home. They may of infected a computer at work, and now to take it home and infect the home computer too means careless thinking. It also shows that if a employee was to leave a cd or flash drive in the office by mistake that employee couldn't be counted on to protect possible sensitive data. They are a risk to the company in my book.

  27. Since when? by Cyno01 · · Score: 1

    I get autorun whenever i pulg in my USB HD, or any cards into my card reader? XP Pro SP2. Also, your average user wouldnt know about holding down shift...

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
  28. Human curiosity kills the computer-Plug&Pregna by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Humans are curious, when you find a cd, hard drive, thumb drive, the first thing your going to want to do is stick it in your computer and find out what juicy secrets are on it."

    Shame that doesn't work with women.

  29. mouses by renehollan · · Score: 1
    ...like mouses and keyboards... [emphasis mine]

    Sorry to be a spelling/grammer nazi, but just what kind of word is mouses?

    'sides, I always thought the plural of mouse was meese? (Or, is that the plural of moose? No, that's moose.)

    --
    You could've hired me.
    1. Re:mouses by ZombieWomble · · Score: 1
      Mouses has somehow, inexplicably, became viewed an acceptable substitute for mice in computing circles.

      From asking various people who use it their reason for doing so, I get answers ranging from "dunno", though fake origins of the word "mouse" in computing terms as some sort of acronym, around claims that the inventor chose that name (as far as I can tell, he doesn't care), to the suggestion that "mice" could lead to confusion with the furry creature (although why exactly it does so more than "mouse" escapes me).

      All in all, it seems rather pointless to me, but it's pretty much common usage in some places now, so seems pointless to complain about it.

    2. Re:mouses by MBuhrow · · Score: 1

      the plural of a computer mouse is 'mouses'
      the plural of the rodent is 'mice'
      the nazis never were right, actually, now that I think about it...

    3. Re:mouses by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      the plural of a computer mouse is 'mouses' the plural of the rodent is 'mice'

      Cambridge Dictionary
      mouse (DEVICE) noun [C] plural mice. a small device which you move across a surface in order to move a pointer on your computer screen
      Some computer geeks like to distinguish themselves by their language, to exclude and denigrate the uninitiated. E.g, they use an irregular plural for box (boxen); and the opposite in this case. Carried to an extreme you get 133t sp33k.
  30. ..or your incarceration :) by ManufacturedMirth · · Score: 1

    "No, really, it's just a test, I'm not bad! Look, I have a Slashdot login!"

  31. Pretty scary. by mlow82 · · Score: 1, Interesting

    It's pretty scary how the thumbdrives were plugged into company computer systems. You'd think the employees would know better. They work at a credit union, a literal gold mine of personal information that should be carefully guarded. I admit I would have had the same reaction as the parent and would have instantly jumped at the opportunity for free flash memory. But I would have tested the thumbdrive on an isolated computer at home first and definitely not on a computer which could possibly reveal other people's sensitive information to the world.

    1. Re:Pretty scary. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      They work at a credit union, a literal gold mine of personal information that should be carefully guarded.

      It's a literal gold mine? You're saying that they mine gold there. The employees are digging into the ground with picks and shovels in an attempt to retrieve gold. Is that correct?

    2. Re:Pretty scary. by mlow82 · · Score: 1
      Is that correct?
      Why, yes! =)
    3. Re:Pretty scary. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But I would have tested the thumbdrive on an isolated computer at home first and definitely not on a computer which could possibly reveal other people's sensitive information to the world.

      But most people are not you. Most people would never suspect that a USB drive on the floor was an intentional vector for a spybot. They would simply think it was a lost drive with some ordinary person's files on it, and hey, wouldn't that be interesting to look at? Do you really think that if someone brought a flash drive into the house, the Typical Mom or Dad would say "Junior, before you use that, let's first plug it into the our family's quarantine PC that we don't connect to any network and see if that thing tries to phone home." Yeah, right!

      The methods used by the auditors was quite well-reasoned.

    4. Re:Pretty scary. by Svet-Am · · Score: 0

      It's a literal gold mine? You're saying that they mine gold there. The employees are digging into the ground with picks and shovels in an attempt to retrieve gold. Is that correct?

      Way to go! You totally took his statement out of context and used it to make what you thought was a funny. Maybe you ought to pursue politics as a career choice. In reality, he said:

      a literal gold mine of personal information

      you cannot just omit the phrase 'of personal information' simply because you don't want to. if you're going to point out flaws in someone's argument, make sure you're on good logical footing.

      --
      [move .sig! for great justice, take off every .sig!]
    5. Re:Pretty scary. by Andrew+Kismet · · Score: 1

      He was being a pedant for the sake of humour. Some people find that kinda over-literalism funny.

    6. Re:Pretty scary. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The word 'literally' is the problem here. The 'of personal information' does not make it correct; it simply makes it both incorrect and a mixed metaphor.

    7. Re:Pretty scary. by CastrTroy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Believe it or not, the banks' #1 concern is not privacy of the customer's data. The #1 concern is accuracy of the data. The most important thing is that the money is where it is supposed to be. This is the reason that banks spend so much on their computer systems. Not to keep the information secret, but to keep it accurate.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    8. Re:Pretty scary. by grammar+fascist · · Score: 1

      The grammar fascist would like to point out that the word "literal" means that whatever follows is not figurative.

      Just to clear that up. It seems like the word "literal" has taken on a less-than-literal meaning lately, and it's entirely possible that the grandparent didn't actually know what it means.

      --
      I got my Linux laptop at System76.
    9. Re:Pretty scary. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Personally, I would test it on a company computer in someone else's cubicle before I would risk infecting my PC at home or at my desk.

    10. Re:Pretty scary. by Ride+Jib · · Score: 1

      I actually agree with this. If I go to the bank and my money is suddenly not in my account, this becomes a hassle for me to prove to the bank I actually have X amount in there. If my account number gets stolen, the bank is accountable and my money will return there with virtually no effort of my own, aside from calling and stating my account is being used fraudulently.

    11. Re:Pretty scary. by tuomoks · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I belive that.. ( used to work for banks, stocks, insurance ( even more paranoid of money. ) in 70's-80's ) My problem with security is now when I'm just a user of those systems - nothing has changed or maybe gone even worse ? We solved many of these (kinds of) problems in 70's and now they pop up again ? Bad training ? Forgetting the history ? Our security checks in 75 found the computers / terminals safe ( belive me, try to break to a CICS, IMS, PATHWAY, whatever system.. ) - BUT trashcans were full of highly confidential documents - go figure? No laptops to steal but briefcases full of contracts, loan papers, investment plans, etc. were lost - no change ? Now working in homeland security - scary !! None of the financial institutions would even look these system - they would loose their money in a second but gov/state/etc.. are happy - weird again ?? On other hand - after my long carier I ( slowly ) start understanding that nobody likes easy solutions, no glory, no fame, plah. plah. plah.. So - happily collecting my decent paycheck ( and trying to tell kids, don't do that - except if you want to be rich.. )

    12. Re:Pretty scary. by smokeslikeapoet · · Score: 1

      You would think that a bank, of all places, would not allow writable and removeable storage AT ALL. There are ways to disable automount/autorun usb devices in Windows. I blame the admins and their security policies. Users will always be DUMB.

    13. Re:Pretty scary. by Dorothy+86 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Sorry to bust your chops further, but the correct word would've been veritable, which implies metaphor. que sera sera.

    14. Re:Pretty scary. by soren42 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't think that's correct... Most banks I know (and, as I work for a large one in a visible role in the industry, I know quite a few) have highly reliable, transaction-safe systems for tracking customer data. Additionally, there are many, many checks in place to ensure data accuracy. There's a reason all of the top 10 U.S. banks still keep all retail banking data on mainframes - it may be an outdated, outmoded platform, but it has decades of development and history. Everything has an audit log. Everything has non-repudiation.

      Security, on the other hand, is only something you can control at the system level. Measures such as mandatory information security training for all employees can help, but it's still up to each employee. As in every organization, the weakest link is people - social engineering is a risk everywhere.

      In the case of the worst, either way, an accuracy problem is less of an issue than a security issue, in most cases. As I stated, transactions are logged, everything can be verified. There is financial risk in cases of most accuracy problems, but they can usually be resolved with a correction and occasionally, compensation of potential loss to the customer. In the cases of security compromise - loss of customer data, malicious modification of transactions, theft, etc. - the risks are much higher. Reputation risk, loss of customer confidence, or worse - serious instability in the country's and the world's economy. There is no tranaction log for information theft.

      Please don't misunderstand me - both are very serious situations. The difference is, we can expect and avoid accuracy problem from years of experience and process. New information and computing security risks arise all the time. Banking transactions today are almost identical to what they were 25 years ago - just digital. No one even thought of USB drives with trojans on them 5 years ago.

      --

      "Adventure? Excitement? A Jedi craves not these things."
    15. Re:Pretty scary. by mooncaine · · Score: 1

      You'd get bagged by the security camera hidden in the lowered ceiling in the cube farm where you work. And the coworker would get bagged for leaving that computer unlocked and logged in.

    16. Re:Pretty scary. by Nutria · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There's a reason all of the top 10 U.S. banks still keep all retail banking data on mainframes - it may be an outdated, outmoded platform, but it has decades of development and history. Everything has an audit log. Everything has non-repudiation.

      That doesn't sound outmoded to me...

      What they are is out of fashion to the "PC Generation" (the same people that share viruses like candy), but those are the stupid people, and there's nothing I can do about that.

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    17. Re:Pretty scary. by Nutria · · Score: 1

      You would think that a bank, of all places, would not allow writable and removeable storage AT ALL

      One word: terminal. If the bank employees only had a 3278 at their stations, such attacks would be impossible.

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    18. Re:Pretty scary. by Dal+Platinum · · Score: 2, Interesting

      One of the major banks in London have an uncanny way of stopping this sort of thing. When they get their desktop boxes delivered, they fill the USB slots with epoxy resin. It's a bit hardcore, but I guess it does the trick.

    19. Re:Pretty scary. by tehcyder · · Score: 1
      Sorry to bust your chops further, but the correct word would've been veritable, which implies metaphor
      You could argue that the original "literal" is being used metaphorically too. Or possibly just as a fairly meaningless intensifier - like "veritable".
      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    20. Re:Pretty scary. by Stepping+Razor · · Score: 2, Insightful

      the "of personal information" bit doesn't make it any less incorrect. it would just mean there was a real gold mine that also contained personal information. the grandparent might have been trying to make a funny, but it was most definitely correct.

    21. Re:Pretty scary. by indifferent+children · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Using the word "literal" metaphorically is like using the word "truth" falsely or the word "intelligent" stupidly.

      --
      Censorship is telling a man he can't have a steak just because a baby can't chew it. --Mark Twain
    22. Re:Pretty scary. by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1
      If my account number gets stolen, the bank is accountable and my money will return there with virtually no effort of my own, aside from calling and stating my account is being used fraudulently.

      Tell that to the many Paypal victims...

    23. Re:Pretty scary. by Himring · · Score: 1

      I do disagree. Computer security is three things and only three things in concept: Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability. True, different entities focus on different aspects, but all entities MUST apply all three. E.g., the Army emphasizes confidentiality over the other two, but that doesn't mean it could care less if the data has no integrity (is wrong) or that is not available (otherwise, what good is it?).

      All three go together or not at all. A bank has to keep what should be private, private. It must make sure the data is accurate and then that it can be gotten to by employees and customers. If I could get to my bank account online just fine, and it was accurate, but the whole world could see it would I care? Yes.

      Mind you, I know you didn't say availability is ALL a bank cares about, so I want to be clear about this. IMO, all three go hand-in-hand, the same emphasis, especially for a bank, or not at all....

      --
      "All great things are simple & expressed in a single word: freedom, justice, honor, duty, mercy, hope." --Churchill
    24. Re:Pretty scary. by plague3106 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So than what exactly is a "gold mine of personal information"? Is the information etched in gold bricks? Its followed by "literal" but doesn't make sense taken literally, does it?

    25. Re:Pretty scary. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd imagine that at least some of the employees did a virus scan of the contents; since the code was written as a custom job by the security experts, it didn't detect as any known virus. Therefore, they assumed that it was safe and clean of viruses, trojans, etc.

    26. Re:Pretty scary. by Omicron · · Score: 1

      You've never worked IT for a bank, have you? :)

      We have the same audits, several times a year. You wouldn't BELIEVE some of the things that pop up. It makes me want to go bury my money in a jar in my backyard. Trusting the protection of my money to the average bank employee is just an absolutely frightening idea to me now.

    27. Re:Pretty scary. by manno · · Score: 1

      Dude I have to be honest the first thing I would have done, is plugged it in, to see if I coulg get it back to the owner. Now I know better, but this scam would have worked on me no problem.

      peace,
      -manno

    28. Re:Pretty scary. by AngusSF · · Score: 1

      You can get a free utility that disables USB drives under the various flavours of WinNT here: http://www.intelliadmin.com/Utilities.htm

      --
      "A gun is a tool, Marian. No better, no worse than any other tool. An axe, a shovel, or anything." Shane (1953)
    29. Re:Pretty scary. by ydra2 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Tell that to the many Paypal victims...

      Yeah I know. My PayPal acount has been flagged for suspicious activity three time this month already and each time I had to reset my password and re-enter all my credit card information.

    30. Re:Pretty scary. by wfberg · · Score: 1

      I do disagree. Computer security is three things and only three things in concept: Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability.
      [..]
      Mind you, I know you didn't say availability is ALL a bank cares about, so I want to be clear about this. IMO, all three go hand-in-hand, the same emphasis, especially for a bank, or not at all....


      What he said, and what your list misses, is that banks care most about Accountability. CIA is a nice short list to memorize, but nowadays, you have to worry about Accountability, Authenticity (different from Integrity as it involves data from the outside world) and Authorisation too.

      Given a choice, a bank will always prefer the solution that maximizes accountability, even if it falls short in the other categories.

      Supermarkets on the other hand, prioritize availability. If you shut down walmart's for a day, they lose millions of dollars in revenue. To a bank, closing down for a day just means interest accrues in account A instead of B.

      Supermarkets have between 8-10% "churn". Goods that go missing, either because they're stolen or dropped and broken, misaccounted for, etc. Given the choice between even 0.5% of the money in accounts going missing and closing down for a day, banks will ALWAYS close down for a day. Because it's not their money.

      They don't care as much about personell using each others passwords than the military does. As long as they can sniff out fraud and follow the money trail. They don't care as much about Confidentiality; clearly sending someone else your statement is not as bad as sending them your money.

      Banks care most about Accountability and Integrity, followed by Availability, Authenticity, Authorisation, and Confidentiality. That's in the order of what it costs them if the principle fails. Sure, these principles are intertwined; o accountability if your data links are easily hijacked because you didn't encrypt them - but the principle of Accountability is the greater good that is served.

      --
      SCO employee? Check out the bounty
    31. Re:Pretty scary. by Shagg · · Score: 1

      Tell that to the many Paypal victims...

      Paypal isn't a bank. Thinking otherwise is why people get into trouble with it.

      --
      Unix is user friendly, it's just selective about who its friends are.
    32. Re:Pretty scary. by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1
      Paypal isn't a bank. Thinking otherwise is why people get into trouble with it.

      Likewise, telling Paypal what your real back account is will also get you in trouble. And when the obvious happens, people will notice that most banks (real banks, i.e. those where your account that Paypal pilfered is...), do not consider themselves as accountable and the customer's money won't return there with virtually no effort of his own.

  32. SOrry-- by way2trivial · · Score: 1

    I buy a lot of office supplies, where can I get such a deal on sharipies?

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
  33. Social Engineering... by CampbellFromCITA · · Score: 1

    Though I'm stating the obvious this is related to the one biggest problem for I.T. today and in the next 20 years - the end users and their tendancy to click things they shouldn't, circumvent measures to stop them doing things they shouldn't and not paying attention to dialog boxes correctly... But if every end user all of a sudden stopped instaling worms, viruses and spyware I think a good 10% or more I.T. support workers would be out of a job - I can see a possible conflict of interest there!

  34. Re:It screams: UNPATCHED by quokkapox · · Score: 1
    What is this, some sort of Mad Lib ?

    The real culprit is MS's AutoPlay or AutoRun though. That is how 500,000 users got infected with the Sony Rootkit.

    Label it "Joe's MP3s" or "JenniCam (archive)" or what have you, or just leave an unlabeled CD or DVD laying around somewhere. Guaranteed someone will open it without holding shift key to disable autorun. Cheaper and more reliable than a USB keys.

    --
    it's a blue bright blue Saturday hey hey
  35. Thin Clients by jabelar · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Banks and other organizations with shared computing requiring high security should consider thin clients rather than PCs. There should be no drives on bank teller computers to transfer data either onto or off of their system.

    1. Re:Thin Clients by warrigal · · Score: 1

      When I worked for IBM (some years ago) our teller terminals (36XX and 47XX) were just that. At startup they downloaded their microcode from the controller. Purpose-bult machines, not PCs with applications software like some I could mention.

  36. Here's the fix by Urza9814 · · Score: 0, Funny

    Put a giant magnetic/EMP field through all the entrances to the buildings. Anything capable of storing data will be wiped and/or fried before it makes it in.

    1. Re:Here's the fix by Yaztromo · · Score: 1
      Put a giant magnetic/EMP field through all the entrances to the buildings. Anything capable of storing data will be wiped and/or fried before it makes it in.

      Really? How do magnets destroy data stored on CDs, DVDs, and other optical media?

      Yaz.

    2. Re:Here's the fix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      stop trolling robots, you jerk! How would you like an knockout ray shot at you as you enter a building? huh?

      racists.

      brought to you by the catchpa: "inquires"

    3. Re:Here's the fix by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Well, the EMP generated by a microwave does a good job of destroying CDs and DVDs. Might be a little hard on employees too though.

    4. Re:Here's the fix by tburke261 · · Score: 1

      What happens when Mr. Senior Executive walks through it with his pacemaker? What about when data stored on an emergency responders mobile device is completely wiped?

    5. Re:Here's the fix by Ksevio · · Score: 1

      Guess we're going to need some lasers to wipe out those as well.

    6. Re:Here's the fix by electronerdz · · Score: 0

      I'd be pretty damn pissed if I walked into your place of business and my PDA was wiped. Or the USB stick that I carry most of the time for my work. Or my Abacus watch. Or my phone. Or my camera that is by my side all the time.

      --
      Kernel Krunch - Part of a Complete OS
    7. Re:Here's the fix by Shadyman · · Score: 1

      But seriously, how many credit unions are going to install sharks with fricken laser beams attached to their heads?

    8. Re:Here's the fix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only natural solution, then, is to put giant high power lasers on the doorways, which will not only pulverize the optical media but the employees and customers too, solving all your problems at once.

    9. Re:Here's the fix by zcat_NZ · · Score: 1

      This also completely solves the problem of ATM fraud, since none of your customers will ever escape the building with a working ATM card!!

      --
      455fe10422ca29c4933f95052b792ab2
    10. Re:Here's the fix by OnceWasLurker · · Score: 0

      Lasers, and crank up the power to the "blow up tanks at 3000m" http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/defense/12 81536.html setting.

      --
      Mmmmm... I'm sure you have an invalid iterator there somewhere.
    11. Re:Here's the fix by Sigg3.net · · Score: 0

      The field detects, then launch itself down on these things, smearing them into the ground.
      Really effective!

  37. Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I read this story a couple of days ago before it got slashdotted. I believe that slashdot is getting slow on the news!

  38. Malware scanners by GWBasic · · Score: 1

    I think this example makes a good case for anti-virus / anti-malware programs.

    1. Re:Malware scanners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anti-virus / Anti-malware programs would do nothing to prevent this. They wrote one use software to do there trojan "attack".

      Anti-virus / Anti-malware programs are designed to stop "blanket" attacks. They don't protect you at all from a hacker attempting to break into "your" system specificly.

    2. Re:Malware scanners by davidbrit2 · · Score: 1

      No, it makes a good argument for default-deny security policies. There's no reason for the OS to blindly execute programs on removable storage without first giving the user a VERY prominent warning (or in the case of Windows, allowing it to be disabled completely via Group Policy).

    3. Re:Malware scanners by GWBasic · · Score: 1
      Probably not. Let me explain:

      Let's say you go with default deny. When the (correct me if I'm wrong) 14 people insert the keys into their computer, they will all be prompted with an "Are you sure you want to run this program?" dialog. Most will probably think "I wonder what kind of cool program this will run?", and click "yes". So, of the 14 people, 10 click yes.

      Then, to prevent such programs from phoning home, you decide to have a default deny for internet access. So, when the 10 people who clicked yes see the "Are you sure you want this program to connect to the internet?", they will think, "I wonder what kind of cool web site this program will take me to?" 7 click yes.

      What about group permissions to prevent people from running unapproved programs? That might work on servers, but not on personal desktops. You will either block programs that 1 or 2 people need to do their job, or your employees will be insulted and move to a different company.

      The fact is that relying soley on permissions and user judgement isn't enough to block malware. Users will either click "yes" out of curiosity, or you will cripple the user. At some point you need to activly check an unknown program to see if it contains any known malware.

  39. I know what those USB drives are! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny
    I heard that Microsoft was giving out free USB drives containing press releases on the need to buy legitmate Windows licences.

    *wink wink nudge nudge*

  40. "Yeah man, we had the day off today..." by spentrent · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Why?"

    "IT says we got dongled, whatevthefuckthatmeans."

  41. Dar. Nevermind. by RevDobbs · · Score: 1

    My apologies... I had forgotten about the Windows Metafile exploit.

  42. My momma always told me... by spentrent · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...you don't know where that dongle's been.

  43. Fixed in Vista by VI$7443V3R · · Score: 4, Funny

    Seriously. It really is.

    1. Re:Fixed in Vista by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was fixed in CVS 3 weeks ago!

  44. And as an added bonus... by patio11 · · Score: 1

    ... if you ever tried to get socially engineered by a little old granny with a p4c3m4k3r it will kill her! Oh, wait, thats not a bonus.

  45. I'd plug it in. by r00t · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Why not?

    OK, maybe I'm too innocent. Normally I run Linux. Are you suggesting that Windows will automatically run executables from any random USB device that gets plugged into the computer?

    If not, these people were dumb enough to run random executables. Granted, having both program-as-icon and data-file-as-icon is a very bad UI choice, but still... 15 out of 20? WTF?

    If so, that Windows actually does the autorun thing... wait a second while I invent new words to describe this particular quality.

    1. Re:I'd plug it in. by Xanius · · Score: 1

      Actually, you can make it autorun off of a thumb drive...windows just loves the autorun.ini file. You set them to hidden on there and the employees don't see it, but windows will run it.

      The idea is great though, would make for a great test, also good for when you need to do house keeping and aren't really sure who's the biggest idiot around the office.

    2. Re:I'd plug it in. by Firehed · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Well, it worked with rootkits on CDs - there's no reason that autorun.inf won't work on thumb drives with spyware. So yes, we are suggesting that Windows will automatically run executables from any random USB device that gets plugged into the computer (in fact, outright stating it!).

      Having the security method of "Run autorun file spyware.exe?" when it's told to do so by an autorun file could go a LONG way here. I hate autorun passionately - it's useful in some cases, but it's just one giant security hole most of the time. I mean, would a mere prompt be that hard to implement?

      Of course this opens up a fun new possibility... bringing a USB drive to people's houses that'll have an autorun to set the browser homepage to goatse or something else equally "fun".

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    3. Re:I'd plug it in. by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      No, it won't. It will auto play CDs, but not usb drives.

      FWIW, in KDE (and probably gnome), you have icons for both programs and data files as well.

    4. Re:I'd plug it in. by Ken_g6 · · Score: 1

      I just added a rule to my WinPooch to give me a prompt about reading "?:\Autorun.inf".

      --
      (T>t && O(n)--) == sqrt(666)
  46. MOD PARENT UP by Shimmer · · Score: 1

    This appears to be the definitive answer (unless Microsoft is wrong about their own OS).

    --
    The most rabid believers in American Exceptionalism are the exact same people whose policies are destroying it.
  47. Windows sandbox by CustomDesigned · · Score: 1

    We had to do this at one of our clients. The problem wasn't USB drives, it was vendor webapps (transportation industry) that insisted on installing ActiveX controls to work. So we setup 4 Windoze PCs in an inuslated subnet to run those, and do other dangerous things.

  48. Related work by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Workers in London financial firms, which handle a lot more money than a credit union, ran CDs from total strangers on the street.

    Kevin Mitnick has pointed out that an attack like this could be made virtually certain to work. Desperately ask the receptionist to let you in, just for 90 seconds, just to use the restroom, and drop a CD on the floor labeled "CONFIDENTIAL: Layoff List". Extra points if you got a copy of the company phone directory and copied some or all of it onto the CD for the finder to browse while the autorun program chugs away.

  49. You have to hack the USB drive itself. by khasim · · Score: 5, Informative

    The hardware itself reports whether it is removable or not.

    If you flip one of the bits, then it will auto-play just like a CD.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SCSI_Inquiry_Command

    It's the "removable medium" setting.

    1. Re:You have to hack the USB drive itself. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but how do you flip that bit? Is it possible, or is it part of the hardware?

    2. Re:You have to hack the USB drive itself. by Al+Dimond · · Score: 1

      This only matters if you're the person trying to implement the attack. From a perspective of securing the network all that matters is whether it's possible that a plugged-in USB device will autorun. Because if it's possible, even if it's hard for most people, it should be defended against.

    3. Re:You have to hack the USB drive itself. by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Is it possible, or is it part of the hardware?

      It's possible- AND it's a part of the hardware. Sort of. It depends on the USB drive itself- and how it is constructed. Some of them do not report removable media bit correctly to begin with- others use part of the flash memory to hold the code and thus can be modified.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  50. at the risk of getting modded redundant... by dknj · · Score: 1

    say there is a file on the usb drive labeled "mindy underwear 001" with a thumbnail of a scantly clad woman. you'd double click it to view it right? what if that thumbnail was an icon for a clever trojan that pops up a look alike of windows' image preview. cool huh? now there's an unauthorized program scanning through your files trying to find username/password combinations. SUCKER!

    i read this article last night.. i think i may start doing this for shits and giggles. the obvious blackhat way would be to steal sensitive information. i'm thinking more obnoxious things that makes people privy to security violations. maybe a few floating penises while the computer is making orgasm sounds. with a text file that explains exactly how it got installed so the user can't say "i was surfing the web and this happened". ahh, i'm loading up visual c++ now. i'll report back with results on monday!

  51. Age old problem... by elderban99 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Once again mankind is sticking things where they shouldn't be and getting infected...something that has been going on for centuries.

  52. three UI problems that allow this by r00t · · Score: 1
    Windows makes three serious errors:

    1. known file extensions are hidden, so you don't see the exe
    2. file icons are not 100% determined by file extension
    3. running an executable file is the same as opening a data file

    Because of those errors, a normal user is unable to determine that a file is an executable. A user is quite reasonable not expecting an exectuable, and there is nothing to alert him to the odd situation. All the user sees is a data file.

    So now...

    The first problem is fixable by hunting down a couple somewhat hidden options. What about the other problems?

    1. Re:three UI problems that allow this by PlusFiveTroll · · Score: 1

      2) change the default icons to something else. Most exe viruses imitate the default windows Icons. 3) On my neworked WinXP(SP2) boxes, they ask if you want to execute unsigned executeables. Im not sure how to make this work on non networked computers.

    2. Re:three UI problems that allow this by Gyga · · Score: 1

      2. in the case of executables isn't unique to windows, most OSs let the program choose its own icon. Example, get a Linux box and look at the firefox logo, OpenOFfice, GIMP, and so on.

      --
      I don't preview or spellcheck.
  53. CD ROMS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    would also work. Leave CD's at a newsstand with "Free Pony Pictures" on it and you have some zombie clients.

  54. Sony 'sploit by HermanAB · · Score: 1

    Just hand out some Sony CDs too and the whole thing can remain perfectly cloaked...

    I have wondered how difficult it would be to do a DNS poisoning of the MS Update address. That could yield full control of heaps of PCs.

    --
    Oh well, what the hell...
  55. Social Engineering by WeeBit · · Score: 2, Informative
    Social Engineering yes. The employees failed miserably, but so did their IT department. It should of been blocked, and the employees drilled on the importance of safety with the sensitive information they have on their premises. I can see to where this would happen though most IT departments hate the words "Social Engineering." They don't say crap to the employees. They just block the crap.

    Today's IT departments... some I have seen treat the employees as though they are retards. They are right to call some that. I don't see how some of them got their jobs. But I can't understand why more IT departments don't have security checks, and chats with the employees. Not ALL of the employees are retards, just a few of them are. Information is key, and IT departments are failing miserably everywhere sharing security tips, and rules with the employees.

    1. Re:Social Engineering by Geminii · · Score: 1
      Not ALL of the employees are retards, just a few of them are.


      Including the managers who set the security policies the IT department has to follow.

    2. Re:Social Engineering by WeeBit · · Score: 1

      You are so right there. I have seen examples of this that makes me wonder why they bother to hire a IT department in the first place if they wont let them do their job.

  56. You could've saved a few words there by Mateo_LeFou · · Score: 4, Funny

    As soon as you used the term "provisionings" we all knew you worked for a Fortune 500 co. Do you "connectorize" stuff, too?

    --
    My turnips listen for the soft cry of your love
    1. Re:You could've saved a few words there by Kynde · · Score: 2, Funny

      "I work at a Fortune 500 company, that actually hands out USB keys with laptop provisionings."

      As soon as you used the term "provisionings" we all knew you worked for a Fortune 500 co. Do you "connectorize" stuff, too?

      I'm a little baffled as to how you managed to miss the first hint...

      --
      1 Earth is warming, 2 It's us, 3 it's royally bad, 4 we need to take action NOW
    2. Re:You could've saved a few words there by Mateo_LeFou · · Score: 1
      I give up...

      "hands out USB keys"?
      "company, that"?
      "I work"?

      --
      My turnips listen for the soft cry of your love
    3. Re:You could've saved a few words there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a little baffled at how you managed to miss the title of the GP post.

  57. USB devices offers some nasty options by warlock.da.newbie · · Score: 5, Interesting

    In the Black Hat conference in 2005 a group introduced a few hacks to access system memory via IEE1394 (Firewire). In the Toorcon conference September 2005 an individual showed a working example of USB 2.0 being used for the same purpose. The main point of this was related to USB and Firewire being given access to system memory via DMA channels. The example shown during Toorcon was a memory dump of the computer while it was booting. Using a USB 2.0 device an attacker can modify system memory outside of the operating systems knowledge. Using a technique like this one could actually write to very low level routines on the computer without the operating system being aware of this.

    1. Re:USB devices offers some nasty options by Ruie · · Score: 1
      Using a technique like this one could actually write to very low level routines on the computer without the operating system being aware of this.

      Hmm.. can this be used to boot Linux on an Xbox ?

    2. Re:USB devices offers some nasty options by warlock.da.newbie · · Score: 1

      I'd have to go dig up the articles but I would take a look at Black Hat 2005 presentations. The Toorcon stuff was mentioned at the conference but was not properly demonstrated. I don't see why you couldn't use it to do something like that as you can inject code into system memory.

    3. Re:USB devices offers some nasty options by linkdead · · Score: 1

      This exploit is the one that disturbs me....all it takes to "tap" a computer is to plug in a USB drive at the right moment.

      Sometimes you wonder why you haven't taken a gluegun to your entire case sometimes... ...now if I found a USB drive...I have a non-networked, generic machine I can hook it up to. About all they would get off of it is a rather nice desktop wallpaper of mountain biking babe Marla Streb...that's about it.

    4. Re:USB devices offers some nasty options by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was a two part persentation. The first part was a ordinary flash drive that had its' removable bit flipped so it would act like a normal CDRom and allow autorun. Other posts to this story go into more detail.

      The second part was to demonstrate a completely software based device that could send invalid USB packets to an attacker chosen device driver to corrupt kernel memory. If mass storage is disabled, don't emulate a storage device, try keyboard or mouse. (USBHUB.SYS and USBHID.SYS had bugs, now patched, that were demo'd at BH '05)

      I'm working on a USB-HID based mass storage device. You'll have to disable your mouse to defend against this device. Haven't looked closely at PS/2 protocol, but it looks complex enough to have some useful holes.

  58. Bold Lie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If it's good enough for Diebold, Sequoia etc, it's good enough for everybody else !@#

    http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Harri+Hursti%22

  59. Okay, if all of you can keep quiet until April by whitehatlurker · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... I think I have an idea for a great April Fool's prank. But I need all of you to be really, really quiet about this. 'K?

    --
    .. paranoid crackpot leftover from the days of Amiga.
  60. Reminds Me by DolomiteZipper · · Score: 0, Troll

    Reminds me of a project a few of my friends and I did over spring break back in the early 90's. Only instead of USB drives we used floppy disks. Looks like they pretty musch just took our idea into the present day. Surprising they didn't give credit to the idea to us original pioneers. Hopefelly they will respond to our emails and give proper credit where its due.

    1. Re:Reminds Me by belg4mit · · Score: 1

      What?! Sure, you could get a boot virus, but when and where were floppies autorun-able?

      --
      Were that I say, pancakes?
  61. The check is in the mail by xkr · · Score: 1

    Many stores now use PCs as their cash registers. Distract the clerk, plug the USB minidrive into the checkout register or the keyboard. "What credit history?" Most small businesses use QuickBooks. Here's my "approved invoice to pay." Check's in the mail...

    --
    I will create a sig when innovation restarts in the U.S.
  62. Re:The word from Microsoft on autorun for nerdstic by theLOUDroom · · Score: 3, Informative
    --
    Life is too short to proofread.
  63. noexec is your friend by twitter · · Score: 1

    Huh? What about cdroms? What about floppy disks? I think the point is, if a user finds a data disk of any format, they might try to see what is on the disk.

    From man mount, Debian Etch:

    noexec Do not allow direct execution of any binaries on the mounted file system. (Until recently it was possible to run binaries anyway using a command like /lib/ld*.so /mnt/binary. This trick fails since Linux 2.4.25 / 2.6.0.)

    There you have it. Contrast this with autorun by default on most Fortune 500 Windoze desktops.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  64. Anonymous file distribution by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That's also how you distribute information anonymously. I've thought about it many times, and if I were in possession of photos of the president getting head from Dick Cheney (and I am not, so don't ask me for copies :-) ) I'd just burn a few dozen CD's while wearing white gloves, a face mask, and a hair net. A little rubdown with some mild bleach solution, and I'd be in business. I'd just find places which were not under video surveillance to leave the CD's laying around. Somebody would pick the CD up and the photos would be out in public, anonymously. There's always a chance to be caught, but it's much safer than using an anonymous remailer through any IP connection from the US which can be subpoenaed and traced.

    --
    Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    1. Re:Anonymous file distribution by BandwidthHog · · Score: 2, Funny

      if I were in possession of photos of the president getting head from Dick Cheney... and I am not

      And that’s the difference between you and me, bub: an 800mm zoom lens.

      Well, that and a very strong stomach.

      --

      Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?
    2. Re:Anonymous file distribution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've thought about it many times...

      That's too bad. I hope you can find help for that.

    3. Re:Anonymous file distribution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'd also want to buy a brand new CDR burner drive and pay with cash. Use that new drive to burn. And destroy it after you were done. Many burner drives leave traces behind on cds they burn (many going so far as to leave the burner's serial number on each cd). If someone ever came across other cds written by your drive, they would find you out.

  65. Re:It screams: UNPATCHED by idonthack · · Score: 1

    What's ___ with____________ all _____ the__ underscores?

    --
    Why is it that when you believe something it's an opinion, but when I believe something it's a manifesto?
  66. Dumb@$$e$ by TheRavenofNight · · Score: 1

    Well, there's 15 more people for the unemployment lines. Heh heh heh.

  67. no, Linux doesn't work that way by r00t · · Score: 1

    In Linux, the icon is assigned the same way as the "start menu" text. It needs to be installed to a data file. A raw executable gets a generic icon. There just isn't any way to embed an icon into a Linux executable.

    Windows actually reads an icon out of the *.exe file. This could be made to look just like an icon normally used for an image, PDF, text file, etc.

  68. Flip one bit, that's not very hard. by twitter · · Score: 1
    If you keep reading, you see:

    The removable media device setting is a flag contained within the SCSI Inquiry Data response to the SCSI Inquiry command. Bit 7 of byte 1 (indexed from 0) is the Removable Media Bit (RMB). A RMB set to zero indicates that the device is not a removable media device.

    So, how hard do you think it would be to make a USB auto run?

    But hey, the mighty Ctrl-Alt-Delete login will protect you, right?

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  69. -noexec by twitter · · Score: 1

    mount(8) isn't the only way to access media, and a lot of others do not require root.

    Yeah, but only root can change the fstab. Just make sure all removable media mounts noexec. This eliminates user click attacks and forces the user to actually copy and change the exec attribute of the file to run it.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  70. autorun.inf doesn't work by emilng · · Score: 3, Informative

    Actually, you can make it autorun off of a thumb drive...windows just loves the autorun.ini [sic] file. You set them to hidden on there and the employees don't see it, but windows will run it.

    Actually, you can't make it autorun off of a thumbdrive with an autorun.inf file even though that may work with a cd, because thumbdrives are considered removable storage like a hd or floppy, rather than removable media, like a cd. I know it because the company I work for had to replicate a ton of thumbdrives and we wanted to make them autorun like our cds, but there's no way to do it without changing the user's registry settings for autorunning.

    A more likely scenario would be to name a file, "cute.jpg.exe" and giving it an image icon. Windows hides extensions by default, so all the user would see is a file that looks like an image with a tempting title to click on.

    1. Re:autorun.inf doesn't work by Slayback · · Score: 5, Informative

      Windows XP SP2 changed this behavior and will use the autorun.inf file to autorun. I use this everyday to have Truecrypt automatically pop up to mount my encrypted volume on my USB drive.

    2. Re:autorun.inf doesn't work by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      A more likely scenario would be to name a file, "cute.jpg.exe" and giving it an image icon. Windows hides extensions by default, so all the user would see is a file that looks like an image with a tempting title to click on.

      See now, that would probably work, but what I don't understand is why.

      You say yourself that by default, Windows hides the extension, so all they'll see is "cute.jpg" (the .exe extension being hidden).

      The thing is, that'll probably be the only file they've ever seen with an extension. And that doesn't ring any alarm bells?

      Makes me wonder if the whole thing is necessary, and how many people you'd get with a file called "malware.exe" or "virus.exe"...

    3. Re:autorun.inf doesn't work by EXMSFT · · Score: 1

      For the average Windows user, no. That won't ring any alarm bells. And no, I didn't mean that as an insult. Really.

    4. Re:autorun.inf doesn't work by MarkGriz · · Score: 1

      "Windows XP SP2 changed this behavior and will use the autorun.inf file to autorun."

      Really? I have XP (Professional) SP2, and I can't get it to do this (not that I want to).
      When I pop in a USB drive with an AUTORUN.INF, it pops up a window asking me what I want to do
        -Open Folder to View Files
        -Take No Action

      Maybe autorun only works in XP home, not professional?

      --
      Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.
    5. Re:autorun.inf doesn't work by General+Melchett · · Score: 1

      Many office workers will have worked with windows pre-xp, and as such will be well used to file extensions being visible, a-la 95, 98 and ME.

      So, it probably wouldnt ring any alarm bells at all for a lot of Xp users...

    6. Re:autorun.inf doesn't work by emilng · · Score: 1

      I had never heard of Truecrypt before, so I decided to check out the documentation.
      "Traveller mode" is how you use a Truecrypt thumbdrive on a machine that doesn't have Truecrypt installed.
      According to the documentation under "Traveller Mode":

      Note that this feature only works for removable storage devices such as CD/DVD (Windows XP SP2 is required for this feature to work on USB memory sticks) and only when it is enabled in the operating system

      The reason why Truecrypt pops up to mount your volume is because it's something you had already installed - kind of like iTunes opening up when I plug in my iPod.

  71. Don't disable anything by Mr.+Freeman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Alright, I've read a lot of people saying "just disable USB devices". Someone said that everything should be locked down and that training people is useless.

    Disabling USB devices will not work. Even if you do it perfectly, that is, disable all storage devices but not keyboards, mice, etc. Why? Because CD-ROM drives have the exact same problem. I don't think floppy drives have any type of autorun function, but you can still put deceptive file names on them. Same problem with Email attachments.

    Now, go disable email, CD-ROMs, floppies, USB devices, and memory card readers at your office/school and see how much work actually gets done.

    You must either educate people, or restrict them to the point where they can't do their job in order to prevent your network from being infected. Given that the latter results in a huge loss of profit, I'd try to educate people.

    --
    -1 disagree is not a modifier for a reason. -1 troll, flaimbait, redundant, overrated are NOT acceptable substitutes.
    1. Re:Don't disable anything by realmolo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Unless they need to use the CDROM drive, floppy drive, USB devices, or memory cards to DO THEIR JOB, then they SHOULD be disabled.

      The fact is, in a business setting, the machines should be completely locked down so that users can do ONLY what they need to do, and nothing else.

      Of course, politics tend to prevent that from happening. But it is proper "procedure".

    2. Re:Don't disable anything by radish · · Score: 1

      Why the hell does an office worker need cds, floppies, card readers or usb devices? They don't. I work for a company with ~50,000 desktops and none of them have a floppy drive, all the usb ports are disabled and applications cannot be executed from the cd drive unless you're admin (we use the cds for cloning). Email is handled easily with scanners & filters.

      And we're pretty damn productive & profitable, thanks. I can't think of a single good reason for enabling any of those things on our machines, if people need to take stuff home with them they do it on a company laptop or via vpn. No company files leave our network - period.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    3. Re:Don't disable anything by jnelson4765 · · Score: 1

      We have.

      At least on our terminal replacements - they have the USB stack completely removed.

      Now, they still have cd drives and floppy drives, but they are set to no autorun, as well.

      We have to go through a proxy server, and only managers can visit the Internet.

      Only supervisory employees have e-mail, and executable attachments are blocked.

      DHCP is also pretty effectively locked down - you need a valid MAC and hostname to get an IP addy.

      However, they apparently never heard of Knoppix... <evil grin>

      --
      Why can't I mod "-1 Idiot"?
    4. Re:Don't disable anything by TomC2 · · Score: 1

      I remember an old Amiga 600 machine I played around with once that seemed to have a floppy disk autorun (the drive was scanned every few seconds - bet they didn't last very long.) Would be interested to know if that was ever exploited!

    5. Re:Don't disable anything by argStyopa · · Score: 1

      We (the undersigned) endorse and approve of this message.
      - J. V. Stalin
      - Chairman Mao Tse-Tung
      - Pol Pot
      - Kim Jong-il
      - Robert Mugabe

      --
      -Styopa
    6. Re:Don't disable anything by xxyyxxzz · · Score: 1

      This is "procedure" in an environment where IT decides the business rules. In a company where IT is a profit center, this makes sense. However, for most companies IT is a cost center - it exists as a cost of doing business. When an IT department actually makes it difficult to do the company's business (overly restrictive and inflexible email limits, aggressively locked down computers, etc) the IT department isn't doing its job of _serving the customers_. Yes, building a secure system that allows for user flexibility is much more work, has a greater possibility of failure, hacks, and social engineering; but if IT decisions are made outside the business realities (what you call politics) then they're bad policies.

    7. Re:Don't disable anything by Mike+Keester · · Score: 1

      This wouldn't have succeeded at my company. We're still running Windows NT 4.0 which doesn't support USB so we're automatically protected.

      Ha-Ha! Suckers!

    8. Re:Don't disable anything by Peeteriz · · Score: 1

      Unless you have a hundred employees doing the same one job description (as in a factory) you cannot easily specify what to they 'need to do'. For any more complex jobs the job descriptions are awfully flexible un unspecific. It is quite likely that a manager or marketing person would need some technical capability (say, USB access) on an unpredictable, irregular basis. It is quite likely that within 1 year of implementing such a restriction you would have found that out the hard way - project delays because of data exchange problems can easily cost more than an increased security risk costs (if your company is calculating such things).

  72. Idiots, all of them. by mikesd81 · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't you be suspicious if you saw a few usb drives laying around in the parking lot? It's a shame, though, this worked so well. It just goes to the ignorance of network security/policies set in a company. Or, worse, blatant disregard. They should all be fired.

    --
    That which does not kill me only postpones the inevitable.
  73. Trojans? Isn't there a saying... by Javaman59 · · Score: 0

    "Beware of Geeks bearing gifts"?

    --
    I'm a software visionary. I don't code.
  74. Evil on a USB drive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Evil on a USB drive: http://www.linux.com/article.pl?sid=06/04/25/19172 28

    Just set Autorun to change the boot settings and run the drive formatter automatically.

  75. What's wrong with this picture? by Omega+Blue · · Score: 0

    The company doesn't have an application level firewall on the gateway? I think they should spend some $ doing that instead of pulling audit stunts.

    1. Re:What's wrong with this picture? by smash · · Score: 1

      My bet is that they still let out e-mail. Own and you're home free...

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
  76. media changes, hoomannz stay the same by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Imagine years ago finding some old unlabeled old floppy disk, "hey, let's check it out!" I wonder how many folks got nailed with viruses that way over the years. In my entire computing career I got one virus, one time, and that was the reason, checking out some weird disk. learned my lesson I did.

      This on-purpose gambit is a variation on the time tested "sting" operation. Want to catch "drug dealers" and users? Be a narc and set yourself up as a bigger drug dealer, they do stuff like that daily. heck, the latest canadian so called 'terrorist' cell was infiltrated with cops and they setup the chemical fertilizer buys for them, according to latest embarassing leak-age being reported.

    With that said, very easy and slick social engineering. Even with this latest news tidbit, I bet you could go out tomorrow and pull off the same stunt. Want to up the ante, and really target the company or agency you want to nail, "lose" a laptop or PDA around there. You could even salt it with some nifty label on the outside "property of acme bigco or bigbrodotagency" or something like that, get some interest quick. The worker drone who found it might take it back to the shop with them, thinking a cow-orker "lost it". How about a guerilla zombiebot networking angle? Make cds with slick printed labels, assorted gamez! or triple xxx hardcore! "Lose" them by the hundreds hither and thon. People slap that disk in, nailed. You could even give them a few games or jpegs so it looked "legit" to them, they wouldn't even notice. Drop them around casually in high bucks high rent district someplace, nail the well heeled, steal CC numbers and passwords, etc. Lose disks like that where dotgov workers go to drink, you'd get some installs, humans being humans after all. Hecks a fire, I have seen some company trying this stuff with alleged "free internet minutes!" They used to mail me that stuff, AWOL or somesuch...

  77. Re:It screams: UNPATCHED by ClamIAm · · Score: 1

    With the way you type, it makes your post scream "my brain is unpatched". Holy crap dude.

  78. There's one born every minute..... by IHC+Navistar · · Score: 0
    This is a pretty good way of getting someone else to do the dirty work for you. The "hacker" can completely deny any wrongdoing, since he can legitimately claim that he "lost" the drives. Then, he can make another legitimate claim that the bank employees, acting completely on their own, without any influence whatsoever, uploaded whatever viruses/trojans/deviled eggs happened to be on the drives.

    Ron White put it perfectly - "You can't fix stupid."

    ----- This is a little off-topic, but what the hell is up with the new Slashdot color scheme?! It's just downright FUGLY! Just because something is new, novel, revolutionary, or abstract DOES NOT mean that it is a good idea. Get with the program.

    -----

    Good morning! / Good night! (Circle one)

    --
    Knowing Google's lust for data collection, the Soviet Union is still alive and well inside the psyche of Sergey Brin....
  79. I call this PnP by joewhaley · · Score: 1

    Plug-n-Pwned.

  80. Physically disable USB ports by default by Orlando · · Score: 1

    This really is a no brainer. A bank or any other such institution should not need floppy, CDROM or USB devices enabled or even installed on the majority of its front of house PCs. Simple. And when I mean enabled I mean physically, ie if the PC cannot be purchased without USB sockets, disconnect them from inside the machine.

    --
    -= This is a self-referential sig =-
  81. Justifies draconian IT policies by AHumbleOpinion · · Score: 1

    "Most people who work in an office do not read this website."

    No, but many IT professionals do. Hopefully they educate their users to be wary of anything they dont own. It's not much different then opening an attachment from an email you receive.


    This experiment also provides justification for draconian policies that disable USB on corporate machines. Regrettably, it is probably much safer and more effective to deny rather than educate. I'm sure many around here will protest such policies but there is a rationale behind them. And for environments that handle sensitive information, like a friggin bank, I hope to god that employees are prohibitted from using company machines for private purposes. Put a machine in the break room that has internet access, but no access to company resources, and let people use that machine for personal stuff.

  82. This is why PS/2 keyboards and mice survive by AHumbleOpinion · · Score: 1

    There ARE useful usb devices, like mouses and keyboards...

    This experiment demonstrates why PS/2 keyboards and mice survive. Some environments require PC/2 keyboards and mice and they do disable the USB ports.

    That and Dell probably saves $0.10, those dimes add up.

  83. Re:It screams: UNPATCHED by NaDrew · · Score: 1
    "JenniCam (archive)"

    Sigh...
    --
    Vista:XPSP2::ME:98SE
  84. What about returning someones Lost USB drive?? by MrSmileyJr · · Score: 2

    Truth is, if I would find a usb drive, especially in an area that I work in, I would assume that it belongs to someone who is regularly in the area, and I would plug in the usb key to read the file that would be (at least on all of mine and my friends usb drives) on there called "if found.txt" obviously containing contact information of the owner. Its quite sad that we have such malicious people in our world that are willing to go to all lengths to make the world a worse place to live in. Having recently read the blog about the guy trying to get back his friends lost (and now effectively stolen) sidekick (http://www.evanwashere.com/StolenSidekick/), I was able relate completely on the fact that I would try my best to return the lost item. This would include usb keys. Its a shame that now I would have to think twice before attempting to return someones lost property due to the security risk :-(

    --
    Fix your Dell XPS m1210 screen! -- http://m1210screenfix.blogspot.com
    1. Re:What about returning someones Lost USB drive?? by gfreeman · · Score: 1

      Or diasable autorun before checking the files.

      --
      Ceci n'est pas un sig.
  85. Re:Close those ports. Buttt.... by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    were THESE Trojans ribbed for YOUR pleasure?

    (Sales could be enlar... umm enhanced if the handles are sufficiently reshaped. Imagine jacking it up to 52-penta-tera-throbba bytes. It won't fit in the back pocket... a backback might be sufficient...And it'll need external power load at that size...)

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  86. Re:The word from Microsoft on autorun for nerdstic by DigiShaman · · Score: 1
    According to this webpage you can get USB Flashdrives to autorun. In fact, the program to make it happen is called Microsoft USB Flash Drive Manager.

    You can configure USB Flash Drive Manager to copy files to and from flash drives; create images of the flash drives for backup purposes (by default, the images are placed in your My Documents folder in a USB Flash Drive Backup subfolder); configure autorun capabilities on a flash drive; and enable wireless configuration settings to be stored on a flash drive.


    Microsoft posted an article on how to disable the autorun feature from removable drives. The problem however is that it requires the drive to be installed first. Kinda pointless as it would be too late once you've connected the device for the first time.
    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
  87. Of course you are safe. by Ihlosi · · Score: 1
    So if you don't run any .exe, .scr files or simular after that you are pretty safe.



    Of course you are safe. There is no such thing as bugs in applications (media players, picture viewers) that allow code embedded in unexectuable files to be executed ...

  88. Re:The word from Microsoft on autorun for nerdstic by Ihlosi · · Score: 1
    The problem however is that it requires the drive to be installed first.

    Fire up regedit. Search for "NoDriveTypeAutoRun". Set to 0xFF.
    At least, that's what I do. I don't want Autorun on any type of drive, thank you, I'd like to decide that for myself.

  89. Wisdom follows, pay attention! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I find a USB thumb drive and plug it in to my computer and there is malware on it, the anti-virus software displays a pop-up warning and asks me to decide whether infected files should be deleted or quarantined.

    If a company does not have centrally managed and updated antivirus software on the entire fleet of its computers, they do not need an audit, because there are more fundamental problems with that company!

    1. Re:Wisdom follows, pay attention! by John+Nowak · · Score: 1

      How do you define "malware"?

    2. Re:Wisdom follows, pay attention! by kniLnamiJ-neB · · Score: 1

      W-i-n-d-o-w-s.

      --
      Windows isn't the answer... it's the question. NO is the answer!
    3. Re:Wisdom follows, pay attention! by gfreeman · · Score: 1

      How do you define "malware"?

      Check for the 'Microsoft Genuine' sticker.

      --
      Ceci n'est pas un sig.
  90. Doesn't even need root by Moraelin · · Score: 4, Interesting

    On the whole, I certainly aggree with you, and it's certainly refreshing to see someone who doesn't fall into the "I use Linux so I'm immune to anything" trap. But I think even you underestimate it a little.

    "Now, while you are watching a cool graphics demo, it checks if you are logged in as root and, if you are, installs a nasty payload. If not, it could simply start emailing every file it finds in your home directory, or delete them, or encrypt them."

    Doesn't even need root to steal passwords. There are a _ton_ of config files and startup scripts in your home directory, which a trojan can attach itself to. It can load itself in your bash window, as a plugin in your mozilla, launch an extra program in your X, replace icons on your desktop, and god knows what else. One of those will catch on to something.

    E.g., if it's, say, Suse, I know that there'll be some programs -- e.g., Yast, every time you run the auto-updater -- where the system will ask for the root password first. I can just replace the link with one to program that shows an identical dialogue.

    Or, yeah, transmitting every file in your home directory is indeed another great way to get a ton of info. Source files that contain the URL, account and password to the productive database are the norm, rather than the exception. Or some cutesy script that goes through the firewall to download the latest nasa pic of the day or whatnot with wget, and in the process contains the user's name and password to go through that proxy. (Let's hope he's used that password in more than one place.) Or there'll always be one idiot who exported the productive database onto his local computer, or downloaded the server configs (including all database connections, with name and password) god knows what else he's copied there. There'll often be one idiot who's built some back door because he can't be arsed to go through the IT department to have something reconfigured or to properly log in. I'll love to know about that backdoor. There'll be emails with forgotten passwords. There'll be emails where people tell each other about those backdoors. ("Oh, if you come from the intranet zone, you can bypass the stupid authenticating proxy completely. Just use http//prod.somebank.com/internalurl/some.jsp?secre t_user_login=admin.") There'll often be text files or spreadsheets with all the URLs, names and passwords he uses. (The geek equivalent of post-it notes.) Etc.

    Config files outside the home directory? Those can be fun too. E.g., everyone will have access to fstab. Maybe they'll have the name and password for every single file share they use in there, or maybe it'll be offloaded to some .smbpassword file, but there's nothing that some trivial parsing can't extract. Or just send it to me as it is, together with any readable file referenced in it. I'll do the extraction by hand.

    Log files? Now those can be a cornucopia of classified information. I've seen people even log each user's name and password at each login through their clever UserRegistry or Single Sign On module or such. If someone copied a bunch of productive logs to their machine -- or I can get the password to the machine where they are -- I might be able to login and cause mayhem as 1000 of their customers. Or go to those customers' profile pages and find out their personal data.

    Etc.

    "If you aren't root the damage is limited, but there is still damage."

    As I was saying, even if you aren't root, the damage done can be catastrophic. The thinking that all that matters is that the OS survives, can sometimes miss the point. Yeah, some guy's Linux installation survived perfectly. But then I got access to his company's servers. Was it that much better? I'll bet that as far as the company is concerned, they would have cared less if I just wiped out one workstation's hard drive.

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    1. Re:Doesn't even need root by Arker · · Score: 1

      It's a matter of scale. With a windows office, you drop off a few keyrings and sit back and relax. It's essentially done. Yes, with a linux office, a determined and skilled attacker can still get in. Sure. No system is perfectly secure, and anywhere security is an issue you need a skilled and active administrator taking active countermeasures rather than expecting otherwise. But look at the difference in both skill and effort required. You're talking about a highly skilled attacker spending countless hours in scouting, custom-building exploits, decrypting files... slowly and cleverly worming their way into a relatively secure-by-design system. As opposed to anyone with no more technical knowledge than your average 14 year old being able to walk in the front door and take whatever you want.

      --
      =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
      Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
    2. Re:Doesn't even need root by Moraelin · · Score: 1

      That's insightful and all, but we're talking about giving someone a keylogger-onna-stick (USB stick), not about breaking into their defenses layer by layer. I don't have to decrypt my way into the database, for example, when some gullible guy ran my program, which sent me all his source files. I just need to grep for something that looks like a database URL in his java sources, for example, to have all I need to connect to their productive database. It's that unskilled a work.

      Sure, it won't be as easy as writing that Trojan for Windows, but it's not as hard as breaking in the hard way either. They can have the most secure system, with exactly zero exploits. Heck, even every single algorithm and method proved correct. It won't matter. With enough idiots running my program off that USB stick, it'll eventually fish all the information I need to just log in and export their whole database.

      It won't even trip their admin until at least half of it is exported. There won't be a long log of trying out every single past exploit and whatever, but just one login that's successful. If you can spot it instantly, you're a better admin than anyone I know.

      Basically I'm not saying that Linux is insecure or anything. I'm saying that, as the article proves, we're at a point where attacking the humans is easier. And as phishing proved long before that: you don't have to break into a bank's systems the hard way, when you can get 1000 guys simply telling you their login data. The bank may well be behind the best firewalls and running the most secure version of Unix ever sold, the phisher can still login and take the schmuck's money anyway.

      Or to put it otherwise: Linux may well be secure. The human at the keyboard, though, can be a much weaker link.

      Basically, you know, just because you're running a good secure OS, doesn't mean you can just run programs off an USB stick or CD found on the front stairs.

      --
      A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
  91. noexec doesn't solve everything by WillerZ · · Score: 1
    Does Windows have the ability to attach devices with a "noexec" option? That seems like it'd be handy in this situation.


    If you have a Linux box, try this:

    1. Put an executable program on a filesystem which is mounted noexec
    2. Run /lib/ld-linux.so.2 /path/to/your/noexec/program

    Phil
    --
    I guess today is a passable day to die.
    1. Re:noexec doesn't solve everything by deek · · Score: 1

      If you have a Linux box, try this:

      1. Put an executable program on a filesystem which is mounted noexec
      2. Run /lib/ld-linux.so.2 /path/to/your/noexec/program


      I didn't try it, but I did see the following quote in my "mount" manual page: "(Until recently it was possible to run binaries anyway using a command like /lib/ld*.so /mnt/binary. This trick fails since Linux 2.4.25 / 2.6.0)"

      I presume that your hack doesn't work anymore.
  92. Autoscan by security s/w? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While not perfect, wouldn't setting whatever anti-virus software is installed to scan the flash drive on insertion before allowing access pretty much stop this? I thought this was standard practice - or have things moved on now?

    As an end-user of a corporate machine, I'm not happy that the anti-virus software on it has been locked down so far that I can't initiate a scan of files or folders or media myself. I deal with customers who need to give me large files frequently (too big for our or their email system), and I have no way of checking that the CD or flash drive handed to me is OK. IT seem to have found yet another way of shooting themselves in the foot.

  93. Disabling USB drives is missing the point by InakaBoyJoe · · Score: 5, Insightful

    People love USB drives for good reasons. They make the data personal, tangible, an object that follows physical laws that users know intuitively. To an IT person, data is just ones and zeroes in some arbitrary physical medium. But to most users, there is a big difference between that letter you wrote last week disappearing into some network ether, versus residing on a physical USB drive you can hold in your hand.

    Most of the comments in this thread are of the "USB drives are a big security hole! Disable them!" variety. What a classic example of IT snobbery. A good administrator, one who understands his users, would stop to think WHY people use USB drives, and try to create a solution that balances the benefits vs. risk to the users.

    Along this line of reasoning, an ideal system would be a thin client that accepts USB drives for file storage, automagically backs them up when they are used, and doesn't run any executables other than what's configured. Kind of like the old Sun smart card idea where the user has a physical, tangible ID card where his files conceptually reside.

    If you want your users to respect your network security concerns, you first have to try to respect your users.

    1. Re:Disabling USB drives is missing the point by smash · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Most of the comments in this thread are of the "USB drives are a big security hole! Disable them!" variety. What a classic example of IT snobbery. A good administrator, one who understands his users, would stop to think WHY people use USB drives, and try to create a solution that balances the benefits vs. risk to the users.

      Keep in mind, we're not talking about mum+dad's small business here. We're talking about a financial institution. Disabling removable media should be fairly high up there on the list of things to do.

      Users require USB disks to work from home? No they don't.

      *IF* they need to work from home, provide a more secure solution (such as ISDN call-back, etc) to their house. Yes, this costs money, however see the point above regarding what sort of business this is.

      In the field we're talking about (dealing with people's finances), security isn't something you should be negotiating with your users just because it is a potential inconvenience.

      A small office in a different industry (where the only risk of monetary loss is your own)? Perhaps USB drives are an acceptable risk... Dealing with customer finances? No f*cking way...

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    2. Re:Disabling USB drives is missing the point by Peeteriz · · Score: 1

      I work in a financial institution and people really do need USB drives to get data from someone in company A to someone in company B, where no direct link is possible because it all is firewalled to hell and to get a workable shared drive or direct network connection would take 8+ weeks to get through the bureaucracy of two different companies managements/IT/whatever people.
          The other possible alternative is unencrypted e-mail, because there is no working and usable (for non-techies) encrypted e-mail solution that would work reliably between two completely unrelated companies - say, your bank, and a marketing agency that needs to send out a message to 10,000 of the bank's customers. Your bank might get the data connections working good and secure within itself, but your employees do need to exchange data with people that are outside.

    3. Re:Disabling USB drives is missing the point by Kiaser+Wilhelm+II · · Score: 1

      Sounds like an institutional problem to me. Disabling external storage is a sensible and nessecary thing to do. If your institution does not have resources in place to share data it should be fixed instead of opening a gaping security hole. Having employees able to take data away from the company that easily is a no-no, especially at a bank that handles personal information. Lax data security policies are what got data stolen from Veterans Affairs.

      --
      Lord High Crapflooder The Right Honourable Vlad Craig Esther McDavenpherson III
      Destroyer of Mercatur.Net
    4. Re:Disabling USB drives is missing the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PGP / GPG encrypted e-mail / files is designed for "encrypted e-mail solution that would work reliably between two completely unrelated companies"

      If your users can't handle that level of complexity, then that's a training issue that you need to resolve.

    5. Re:Disabling USB drives is missing the point by Peeteriz · · Score: 1

      But that's the point - in real life, people do have to take data away from the company to different companies to do their jobs; they know what data they need; they are allowed to do that; they are trying to do in the best way possible; but they don't have appropriate technical ways to get the files from person A in one company to person B in another company. And IMHO it is not their fault, it is not their job, it is not their skillset, and it is not within their power to force a policy change.
          If there is no other way, then you get a CD burned or USB written, and deliver the data via sneakernet. If cdwriters and usb are blocked, as they often are, then they get a special permit and have it done anyway(it HAS to be done, after all), only it creates bigger delays.
          What I am saying, is that if two companies need to exchange data and then they don't have the technical infrastructure to do it properly, then the only possible solution is to exchange data insecurely - not 'disabling external storage' (that would be like securing a webserver by turning it off). It is an institutional problem, of course! But if institution needs the infrastructure improved, then anyway it needs to function until (and IF) such improvements are completed. USB/CD is the best solution available (compared to unsecured e-mail), so it cannot be a 'no-no' until a better solution is implemented and working and available to the non-technical endusers. Not exchanging the data is not an option, naturally. And the data exchange needs are on a completely different timescale (less than two weeks) than any corporate/IT technical infrastructure change (many months), so they cannot wait. If changes need to be done, then at first the more secure alternative must be created, and only afterwards the insecure way can be restricted.

    6. Re:Disabling USB drives is missing the point by smash · · Score: 1
      If there is no other way, then you get a CD burned or USB written, and deliver the data via sneakernet. If cdwriters and usb are blocked, as they often are, then they get a special permit and have it done anyway(it HAS to be done, after all), only it creates bigger delays.

      This is the way you go. It creates bigger delays? Then you should take that into account when putting a timeline on the project, or get a better relationship with your IT dept and include them in the planning of such projects.

      If you can't get a permit/get a CD burned within a day or so (and the project really is that time critical), then your company has serious organisational problems, IMHO.

      Sorry, but as I posted above - security is NOT optional in one of these environments - and if it is considered optional, you're opening yourselves up to a lawsuit if/when data escapes - as IMHO (and i'm quite sure others would argue the same) - due care was not taken with your customer's personal details.

      I agree, it's not as easy as just slapping in a thumb-drive and copying what you like - but when the shit hits the fan (and believe me, sooner or later it WILL in that environment) - you're leaving yourself open to being legally fucked.

      It's simply too risky.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
  94. yeah by palindromic · · Score: 1

    a very similar thing happened to me..
    someone left a cupcake on my desk and i ate it, and then i e-mailed my bank info to a guy in Nigeria.

  95. HOWTO: not be con-ed by hummassa · · Score: 1
    Unfortunately, even if you run ubuntu, you are still vulnerable - that's the beauty of social engineering.
    How come? Ubuntu wouldn't execute the "autorun.inf" thing; certainly woudn't execute it under wine just for the sake of it. One would plug it on Ubuntu, see some funny files, format the thingy and use it forever. No harm done. And no, I would NOT execute binaries handed to me by completely untrusted strangers (and yes, I trust Canonical -- they have not let me down in the last 2 years).
    Anecdote: Back in 1984 (I was 14), I worked as "gopher boy" for a bank. Many times con men tried to stop me on the street when I was doing errands and pass a con. They never succeeded with me -- though some of my colleagues have fallen, and lost money (theirs and others') to those guys. I just looked at the guy and said "come on..." and went on.
    It's the same:
    1. if a complete stranger is offering it to you, you don't need it.
    2. if you don't have word of mouth from someone you know that it's good, it probably isn't.
    3. if it seems too good to be true, then it probably isn't true.
    In your SIGGRAPH example, I would either: ask someone I know and trust if it vows for the integrity of the thing; decompile the thing and see if it does not do anything nasty (because I can -- and I know many can't); run it in a sandbox (likewise) with no net connection, and no access to my account on my computer (probably I would do this even if someone vowed for the cleaniness of thing just to be sure -- the fact that I'm paranoid does not mean they aren't out to get me); or NOT RUN IT AT ALL.
    --
    It's better to be the foot on the boot than the face on the pavement. ~~ tkx Kadin2048
    1. Re:HOWTO: not be con-ed by atta1 · · Score: 1

      And if everyone practiced safe computing like that, then phishing scams and spam in general would go away and even Windows would be a relatively secure OS. It's easy to sit here and say "I wouldn't get caught by that", but that's not really the issue. You yourself admitted that some of your colleagues were conned by the same people you ignored. Do you believe everyone who works at your bank is as paranoid about this stuff as you are? The whole point is that for the majority of systems, cracking the people involved is far easier than cracking the system. So what if you're that paranoid, is your employer that safe from the guy in the cubicle next to you? What about the admin down the row? What about the mountains of middle managers who have enough access to cause harm?

      --
      "The avalanche has already started. It is too late for the pebbles to vote" -- Kosh
  96. Did the Auditors break the law by HerebeDragon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If they got a hit of 15/20 usb drives, but what happened to the other 5. If they scattered them in a public place, surely other members of the public could have picked them up and could have been compromised. This would put the auditors the wrong side of the law and they had no prior agreement to pentest the general public.

  97. Re:It screams: UNPATCHED by z0idberg · · Score: 1

    I get it, this is one of those fill in the blanks games right?

    Let me try.

    This is mildly interesting, but not because the__curious__ employees did anything wrong. It points out that_while_ the sysadmins have been keeping horribly unpatched_computer__ systems around that could be infected by data. And old exploits, at that.
    ____________Merely______________ Examining data should not lead to altering other_sensitive__ data. Still less system files. Microsoft is a__spectacularly__ crufty bugfest. Nothing more to see here ... move along.

    Do I win a prize?

  98. need we ask ... by rs232 · · Score: 1

    Need we ask on what OS was this trojan so easly run?

    "I had one of my guys write a Trojan that .. would .. email the findings back to us" "Slowly but surely info was being mailed back to him"

    --
    davecb5620@gmail.com
  99. Security Just Ask The U.S. VA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People are definitly the weakest link...

  100. So the Plan is. by Chainsaw76 · · Score: 2, Funny

    1) Buy a crate of USB drives cheap..
    2) Install images and Trojans on all of them
    3) sell them on ebay one at a time.
    4) Harvest the spoils.
    5) Profit!

    -Jason

    1. Re:So the Plan is. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      6) Go to jail

    2. Re:So the Plan is. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      6) Go to jail

      Not unless you form a corporation and do it in that corp's name---quite covertly at first, and admit to things openly once people figure out. Isn't this exactly what Sony did? I don't see -anyone- even considering sending -anyone- to jail.

  101. Damage as root vs user by Darren.Moffat · · Score: 1

    The damage a trojan can do as a user is much worse than root. Running as root it will probably only damage the system config which can easily be recovered from original media. As a user it can damage or forward your data thats a much worse situtation; it can also impersonate you and damage your reputation.

  102. If Elmer Fudd taught us nothing else... by elrous0 · · Score: 1
    Wabbit + Carrot + Shotgun = Wabbit Hunting

    -Eric

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  103. An O/S should not trust external EXEs by master_p · · Score: 1

    And operating system should not trust external executables. By external, I mean all those executables that are not part of the installation of the machine or not explicitely labelled as "internal". The first time an external executable tried to access a resource, the operating system should block it and notify the user. If the user knows the program is harmless, then she should go and unblock the program.

    If it sounds like a firewall for executables, then it's because it is a firewall for executables. It would solve the problem mentioned in the article, the problem of running illegal code from emails, etc.

    1. Re:An O/S should not trust external EXEs by Thundersnatch · · Score: 2

      Microsoft has actually had this "exectuable firewall" working for years. It's called "Software Restriction Policies", and it's been part of Windows Group Policy since XP was released.

      The problem is, maintaining a list of hashes and signatures for all exectuables, DLLs, scripts, etc. in a coporate environment is a real pain in the butt. The list is constantly changing, so almost nobody uses this feature. We use it for limited end user machines, and kiosks, but it is unworkable for end-users like developers (which would still probably fall for this example of social engineering).

  104. Re:NSA is after you by kniLnamiJ-neB · · Score: 1

    Hell no, you did NOT just kick my fish!

    Offtopic, but the funniest thing I've read all day.

    --
    Windows isn't the answer... it's the question. NO is the answer!
  105. Remind me of a lesson my mother taught me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Don't eat anything off the floor! You don't know where it's been!"

    Guess the same logic applies to computers...

  106. Re:It screams: UNPATCHED by redelm · · Score: 1
    Apologies for the underscores -- they came in from a links cut'n'paste needed by slashcode that didn't like reusing cached pages.

    Autorun is a bug in itself that needs patching. Users operating with admin privs is another.

  107. Oh yeah .... by ipjohnson · · Score: 1

    It should be totally illegal to listen to a cd on your computer at work .....

    How quickly would you quit if that was the case?

  108. You're Daydreaming about Unreal Solutions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Most of the comments in this thread are of the "USB drives are a big security hole! Disable them!" variety. What a classic example of IT snobbery...
    Along this line of reasoning, an ideal system would be a thin client that accepts USB drives for file storage, automagically backs them up when they are used, and doesn't run any executables other than what's configured.

    The problem, Wise Guy, is that such a system doesn't exist today! So your post is useless. OTOH disabling all autorun devices is can be done today, works and will work tomorrow. Don't criticize valid solutions unless you can provide a reasonable alternative. When you've got something useful to post, come back.

  109. Security through Virtualization by foamrotreturns · · Score: 1

    This is why I keep virtual machines available on all my boxen. If I have a chunk of data (especially the executable variety) that appears to be sketchy, I load up my dummy OS and check it out. After viewing the content, whether or not it appears to have done any damage, I unmount the filesystem and revert the VM to its previous state. In the future, I'm pretty sure that very little software will run in the space that it does today. Most of the OS will be virtualized, BIOS will be replaced with EFI, and the OS kernel could quite possibly be stored in ROM. While malware will never go away entirely, in the not-so-distant future, its writers will need to spend a lot more time & effort to get the same results.

  110. Where was the network security??? by xferboy · · Score: 1

    Unless they knew the version/brand/etc of the email client, writing the trojan to use the client machines existing email client would be a little on the tricky side (unless they were supplied with the info, or retrieved it via some other method), so I'm guessing that they had the trojan send the email itself.... (I'd probably write it that way to)

    So does that mean that SMTP outbound was enabled on the firewall (or more to the point, not disabled)?? What other ports are open allowing unrestricted access.

    Sure, the users that plugged in the keys are at fault, but a simple rule at the bottom of the firewall rules (deny all to all) and only allowing required services would have stopped this as well.

    Then again, I could be wrong.

    1. Re:Where was the network security??? by omry_y · · Score: 1

      easy, just guess Microsoft outlook.

      --
      Omry.
  111. Connectorizing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Proactively !

    1. Re:Connectorizing by Mateo_LeFou · · Score: 1

      I'm still waiting for "solutionate" ... then, of course, "solutionation"

      --
      My turnips listen for the soft cry of your love
  112. Wouldn't other company's employees pick it up too by SecretSqrl · · Score: 0

    Beyond the issue of encrypting the data sent, how could they guarantee that only the target company would receive the thumb drives. Couldn't employees of other companies pick them up too, and then they would receive data from these other companies? Or the employees of the target company would bring them home, use them on their home machines, compromising the home machine. This gets really messy. I think that what the security people did was pretty dangerous from a legal point of view.

  113. What those studies prove... by Joce640k · · Score: 1
    users can be conned into giving up their passwords for a chocolate bar or a $1 bill....


    All those studies prove is that people are willing to say

    they'll give away their passwords for a chocolate bar.

    If somebody offered me a chocolate bar for my password I'd tell them a fake password then take the chocolate.

    --
    No sig today...
  114. I don't know what is worse by Lord+Kestrel · · Score: 1

    I don't know what is worse, that the computers were misconfigured by enabling autorun on a usb drive, or that their security policies allow wide open outbound access for the data to get out.

  115. Here's the _real_ fix by Ykstort · · Score: 1

    If you hold, IIRC, shift while putting in a CD, DVD, USB drive or whathaveyou, it disables autorun.

  116. KDE and GNOME by r00t · · Score: 1

    KDE and GNOME seem to be safe regarding programs. You don't get custom icons when viewing raw binary executables. You only get the per-app icons in menus, as chosen during installation.

    There is a slight problem with GNOME at least: image files are shown as thumbnails. This prevents the user from strongly associating an icon with the type of file.

    Ideally, all images (PNG, JPEG, etc.) should have the same icon. All text documents (DOC, HTML, TXT, ETC.) should have the same icon. Having a small number of different icons is important to usability. Perhaps a couple dozen would be a nice total.

  117. No, you're not by arete · · Score: 1

    Certainly you are still _vulnerable_ to social engineering, but you are not AS vulnerable to this kind of social engineering attack.

    1. With Windows you are apparently vulnerable just BROWSING the flash drive. Or so says many posts on here, at last. With Linux you must run an executable in there, and you are less likely to run a nonexecutable file in an exploit happy ActiveX environment (eg, IE) or similar.

    2. To root your machine with Linux you ALSO need a privilege escalation attack. With Windows if you don't run as Administrator on a normal desktop you face an uphill battle of getting applications to work, because Microsoft has made little attempt to force the body of applications - even major commercial ones - to run not-as-root and even install not-as-root unless they really need root privs. Linux and OS X both do this nicely because the OS demanded it of the application developers. Without escalation the payload is always limited in what it can do to the overall OS... at a minimum you'll be able to clean the computer, which is often not feasible with Windows.

    --
    Looking for freelance Actionscript (Flash/Flex) or ColdFusion work and/or freelance developers. Email me, put Slashdot