Slashdot Mirror


French PM Unreceptive To RMS

An anonymous reader writes "Six month after the publication of very bad amendments to French DRM law proposal, Richard Stallman has been pushed back by the chief of security team of French Prime minister. On Friday 9th of June 2006 at 3.30pm, Richard Stallman, president of Free Software Foundation, led a delegation composed by Frédéric Couchet (Free Software Foundation France) and Christophe Espern (EUCD.INFO initiative) to meet the French Prime minister in order to talk about the French DRM law proposal and to deliver the EUCD.INFO petition signed by more than 165,000 French residents. Richard Stallman and his friends were pushed back by the chief of security team. "

534 comments

  1. RMS! by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Word of Advice: DO NOT try this in your home country.

    --
    There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
    1. Re:RMS! by IDontAgreeWithYou · · Score: 1

      Well, I doubt there are many (if any) countries in the world where you can show up unannounced at the door and get a meeting with the leader.

      Step 1: Come up with a pet cause and a petition.
      Step 2: Show up unannounced at world leader's office or residence and (SURPRISE) not be allowed in.
      Step 3: Publish a story about how you were denied your meeting with the world leader. Step 4: ??? Step 5: Profit (if allowed by the GPL).

      --
      Finding other idiots on /. that agree with your opinion doesn't make it any less stupid.
    2. Re:RMS! by IDontAgreeWithYou · · Score: 1

      Forgot to preview:

      Step 1: Come up with a pet cause and a petition.
      Step 2: Show up unannounced at world leader's office or residence and (SURPRISE) not be allowed in.
      Step 3: Publish a story about how you were denied your meeting with the world leader.
      Step 4: ???
      Step 5: Profit (if allowed by the GPL).

      --
      Finding other idiots on /. that agree with your opinion doesn't make it any less stupid.
    3. Re:RMS! by mrchaotica · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You missed a step:

      Step 1.5: Try to schedule a meeting with the leader and get ignored

      I'd be pissed off too if I represented 165,000 people and was twice blown off by some "leader" who was obviously too busy to do things like actually listen to his constituency!

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    4. Re:RMS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Wow. RMS is nearly as important as Lyndon LaRouche.

    5. Re:RMS! by timster · · Score: 1

      Don't forget to bring a megaphone and stand outside the window of the leader's office, reciting important plot twists from books that he was planning to read.

      --
      I have seen the future, and it is inconvenient.
    6. Re:RMS! by IDontAgreeWithYou · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I don't doubt that the prime minister has no intention of meeting with RMS, but in fairness their request to see the PM was two weeks before they showed up. It is quite possible, and in fact likely, that the PM of France might actually be so busy as to not be able to schedule a meeting within 2 weeks. We're talking about DRM here, not a pending German invasion. It can wait. I doubt there are many world leaders you could get a meeting with in less than two weeks.

      --
      Finding other idiots on /. that agree with your opinion doesn't make it any less stupid.
    7. Re:RMS! by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Why not. He would get almost the exact same treatment?
      Oh it is because you think that France has more respect for free speech the the US...
      I guess you didn't see the protests/riots on CNN over labor reform, you might also try this in Google France+Rainbow+warrior
      That being said trying to force your way into seeing any government official is at best dumb and most likely dangerous.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    8. Re:RMS! by mrchaotica · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The PM doesn't have to schedule it himself; that's what secretaries are for. If nothing else, two weeks should have been enough time for the secretary to at least reply with something like "we received your request, and it's waiting to be processed" (assuming they sent it by some reasonably speedy method).

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    9. Re:RMS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Particularly I loved the captions on the photos, such as "citizens in the gutter". I imagine that the rest of the team would have had more chance of an audience if they hadn't turned up with RMS in the lead, if only for one very obvious reason - he isn't actually a citizen of anything relevant.

      This does rather remind me of that recent flamebait article that suggested that RMS's tactics could be embarrassing. Whilst it was a crap article, the melodrama is a little obvious. Particularly the bit about going down the local Fnac (French cd/dvd/book megastore, I don't know about 'cultural superstore') to form a 'flash mob'. Whilst on the one hand this is fairly common behaviour - I recall once I was in the Virgin Megastore on the Champs Elysees and a recently paxed (~married) couple and their friends turned up to celebrate by chucking around some tear gas - it's not exactly the sort of thing that makes people think kindly of a cause. But probably it was a lot of fun and relieved everybody's feelings of frustration.

      Next presumably it will be activists bunging 'Warning! DRM!' or 'Accomplice in the slaughter of the Commons' stickers on the back of CDs, a la Greenpeace :-)

    10. Re:RMS! by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      The Rainbow Warrior?

      Yes, it was a travesty by all accounts, but talk about ancient history. Are you seriously going to blame that on the current administration?

    11. Re:RMS! by IDontAgreeWithYou · · Score: 1

      I never implied that the PM would schedule anything on his own. I am implying, however, that for RMS, it makes a better story to say "Hey, we asked for a meeting and never got a reply, so we showed up and they wouldn't let us in." The PM of France might just have a few things on his plate that he considers more important. So, no I don't think two weeks was a reasonable amount of time to expect to get a reply of any sort.

      --
      Finding other idiots on /. that agree with your opinion doesn't make it any less stupid.
    12. Re:RMS! by pete6677 · · Score: 1

      I missed the part about RMS being a French citizen.

    13. Re:RMS! by Qzukk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Maybe these days people just expect the government to be run like a company (when was the last time you got even so much as a stock form rejection email from a job application?) but all it takes is a secretary dropping a "sorry, after 'mature reflexion' we decided not to see you" letter in the fax machine and hitting send.

      The French PM may have "maturely" decided not to have the meeting but his lack of response to any of the letters requesting it was quite immature.

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    14. Re:RMS! by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      The 165,000 people who signed his petition, along with (presumably) the two guys with him were all French citizens.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    15. Re:RMS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But they felt the need to get RMS to represent them.

      This may not have been the best possible move.

    16. Re:RMS! by pcardno · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So yeah, a guy representing 0.2% of the country demanded a meeting with their Prime Minister giving two week's notice that he would be arriving?

      I can't even book time with a plumber to fix a leaky tap in the next two weeks, never mind a Prime Minister!

      --
      --- Band: Joey Ultra
    17. Re:RMS! by russ1337 · · Score: 1

      "two weeks should have been enough time for the secretary to at least reply with something like "we received your request, and it's waiting to be processed"

      Seeing as the French are very well known for being polite, tolerant, friendly and kind, i'm quite surprised that a rejection letter wasnt accompanied by some flowers and a bottle of the finest...





      (The above comment is sarcasm. This footnote is included as sarcasm is not usually recognised on /. without such a disclaimer...)

    18. Re:RMS! by russ1337 · · Score: 1

      Dont get me started. I'm a New Zealander. Do you think that saying to an Iraqi in 10 years time "oh that invasion? talk about ancient history", or to an american citizen about al-queada "hey american, dont be a player-hater, that happened years ago? you gonna blame the current leaders of al-quada?"

    19. Re:RMS! by shawn(at)fsu · · Score: 4, Funny

      I was reading this and saw the 165,000 figure and I knew that couldn't be much of the population. I checked wikipedia and it amounts to .2% of the population. .2%, so i wondered what other groups made .2% or more of a population and figured I checked the amount of people who said they were Jedi for a religion in Britain. That came in at .7% of the countries population.

      Geee and he wasn't allowed in right away......

      --
      500 dollar reward for tip(s) leading to the arrest of the person(s) who stole my sig.
    20. Re:RMS! by mclaincausey · · Score: 1
      We're talking about DRM here, not a pending German invasion.
      Bad analogy. If history is any guide, the French response to a German invasion would be to surrender immediately instead of denying access.

      BA-ZING!

      --
      (%i1) factor(777353);
      (%o1) 777353
    21. Re:RMS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn it, where are mod points when I need them? This Larouche guy has supporters clogging the streets of Montreal with his amateur looking signs, so I got a good laugh out of this post!

    22. Re:RMS! by belmolis · · Score: 2, Informative

      According to the CIA World Factbook, the population of France is 61,000,000, of which 18.3% are 14 or under, so the over-14 population is about 50,020,000. 165,000 is 0.33% of this. A petition signed by 0.33% of the population probably "represents" a significantly larger fraction of the population if you consider the difficulties of getting people to sign things and the fact that this is not the kind of issue that is constantly on most people's minds.

    23. Re:RMS! by ickyellf · · Score: 0

      Way too many abbrevs in that art.

      --
      There's no place like ~.
    24. Re:RMS! by miquelets · · Score: 2, Insightful

      a pending american invasion???

    25. Re:RMS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, he'd probably end up like this. :)

    26. Re:RMS! by belmolis · · Score: 1

      Even if you take the Wikipedia figure for all of France (not just metropolitan France) and don't exclude children, the petition's 165,000 signatures constitute (100*165000)/63588000 = 0.25948%, which rounds to 0.3%, not 0.3%. Not a huge difference, but if we geeks don't get this stuff right, who will?

    27. Re:RMS! by andreyw · · Score: 1

      Beats getting Paris ground into the ground.

    28. Re:RMS! by shawn(at)fsu · · Score: 1

      Yeah I jumped the gun.

      For a moment I thought it was going to be one of those mistakes where I misplaced a decimal point. "I always do that!"

      Thank you for the peer review.

      --
      500 dollar reward for tip(s) leading to the arrest of the person(s) who stole my sig.
    29. Re:RMS! by mclaincausey · · Score: 1

      Are you suggesting that RMS is planning a military attack on Paris? He's turning into quite the zealot these days...

      --
      (%i1) factor(777353);
      (%o1) 777353
    30. Re:RMS! by tomjen · · Score: 1

      So It will take longer to get a plumber with the ability to fix the Prime Minister - I mean where do you get so smart plumbers?

      --
      Freedom or George Bush
    31. Re:RMS! by jellomizer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I am not sure if you looked at the photos or not. But RMS didn't even Dress up for the occasion. Which I would considered very rude and unprofessional, even as a programmer. What do you expect the guard to do. Let a bumb from the streets into the building. I am sure their orders and training tell them even with all the credentials and ID if they feel suspisios of the person not to let them in. If you have a meeting with a high position person and you have it scheduled you really should dress up for it. No matter how full of yourself you think you are.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    32. Re:RMS! by rolfwind · · Score: 0, Troll

      Actually, RMS wasn't pushed back because of politics. What the PM said during the encounter may shed some light on the problem:

      RMS comes close.

      PM: "Ooh la la, it's Pepé Le Pew! Allez-vous!"

    33. Re:RMS! by secolactico · · Score: 4, Funny

      Maybe he sent the rejection notice in .doc format, and RMS' system automatically rejects all attachements in a non free document format.

      --
      No sig
    34. Re:RMS! by belmolis · · Score: 1

      I don't know where people get this nonsense about RMS being unbathed and smelling bad. I've spoken with him face-to-face and he didn't stink or seem unwashed.

      Incidentally, one thing you can say for the Prime Minister of France is that he knows how to speak French. He would have said: "Allez-vous en!", or, less politely, "va-t'en".

    35. Re:RMS! by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Now that I could believe!

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    36. Re:RMS! by mOdQuArK! · · Score: 1

      Actually, given how things turned out in Iraq, that'll be the response of just about _any_ country in the world that gets invaded by a much more powerful country - the "official" government will surrender immediately, then the occupying force will spend the next five years or so hunting for insurgents and trying to figure out what the form of the next IED is going to be.

    37. Re:RMS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      80% of French people (myself included) hate this prime Minister and he does not take that into account. Imagine what 0.2% can do... :-/

    38. Re:RMS! by frp001 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The PM of France might just have a few things on his plate that he considers more important.
      This may be true, given that our PM is up shit creek with no paddle as he is implied in a major scandal involving weapon trading, false document and intra government back stabbing.
      But OTOH all this DRM issue is being discussed in both parliaments at this moment, and to be fair, this was indeed the correct timing. Furthermore, at the moment the french government is making itself very unpopular by pushing laws without leaving much space for a proper democratic discussion.

      --
      May I use your sig please?
    39. Re:RMS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, in this country he'd be labeled a terrorist (the beard you know) and dissapear into the gulag in Gitmo.

    40. Re:RMS! by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 2, Funny

      When I worked in Cambridge, Mass, I was near enough to MIT to see what a coworker and I called "The Cult of Richard Stallman". It consisted of the occasional solitary pudgy male wearing at least a too-tight black t-shirt if not all black. The t-shirt usually had a computer reference on it (usually a Linux penguin) or an anime image. An unkempt and long beard and hair were requirements.

      Since I never talked to one of these guys I can't say for certain if any of them has ever said "Worst episode ever!".

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    41. Re:RMS! by Stoutlimb · · Score: 1

      I wish I had mod points. I would have modded you up just for your sig. :-)

    42. Re:RMS! by DonPMitchell · · Score: 1

      Looks like a typical RMS publicity stunt.

    43. Re:RMS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1 predicatable French stereotype

    44. Re:RMS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like there is something in France worth invading and taking?

    45. Re:RMS! by imarsman · · Score: 1

      Unlike the German invasion Stallman could not just detour around security.

    46. Re:RMS! by Zeinfeld · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Two weeks?

      There is a thing called protocol. Diplomatic protocol has many functions, one of them is to serve as a spam filter.

      It sounds as if what they did was to send the letter to the French PM's office directly where it would be mixed in with all the letters from the other hundred thousand or so cranks writing to him. The chance that the letter would even be read by a minor functionary in that time is small. The chance of a prompt reply smaller.

      Correct protocol in the case of RMS would have been to send the letter to the French Embassy in the US and request a meeting with the minister in charge of technology. Demanding a meeting with the PM is pretty presumptuous for a private individual who is not even a citizen of the country concerned.

      I was really hoping that this was going to be a case where I could say that I had zero sympathy for either party. However it appears that only RMS was acting in a meglamonaical fashion in this particular case.

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    47. Re:RMS! by zaphod_es · · Score: 1

      I doubt there are many world leaders you could get a meeting with in less than two weeks.

      Bet you could get a meeting with RMS in less than two weeks :)

    48. Re:RMS! by PeelBoy · · Score: 1

      Is it possible to have proper democratic discussions with RMS?

    49. Re:RMS! by Pollardito · · Score: 1
      We're talking about DRM here, not a pending German invasion.
      actually, i think it took much longer than 2 weeks for them to address the German invasion as well, so who knows how long it would take to get a meeting on DRM
    50. Re:RMS! by easter1916 · · Score: 1

      Get over it, Kiwi. Criticize your own people for their treatment of the indigenous population if you're so focussed on history.

    51. Re:RMS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you even know what a gulag is? Have you read any accounts from former prisoners of genuine Soviet gulags? Please direct me to the account written by a former Gitmo prisoner where he describes being dragged through a pipe lined with fish hooks. Then you may proceed with your analogy.

    52. Re:RMS! by Bastard+of+Subhumani · · Score: 1

      Don't be mean. Do you really begrudge the French having one naval victory?

      --
      Only three things are certain; death, taxes, and apocryphal quotations - Ben Franklin.
    53. Re:RMS! by soft_guy · · Score: 1

      165,000 is a very small number.

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
    54. Re:RMS! by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      I have a question for you if you don't mind.
      Why did the bombing cause an anti-us backlash? I have seen no information showing that the US was involved. Did it just increase the anti-nuclear feelings or did it feed into the don't let New Zealanders get slaughtered in foreign wars feeling that started after the battle of Gallipoli?
      I like to understand different points of views.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    55. Re:RMS! by QuantumG · · Score: 2, Informative

      Oh fucking please. Why would the PM meet with anyone at anytime with any amount of notice about DRM. It's a non-issue to him and the majority of the people of earth. Meeting with the PM is the last thing you do, after you've gotten the world on your side. Now if he'd tried to meet with a MP that has a private member's bill coming up and isn't sure what issue he should address, that'd be sensible. The FSF are fuckin' morons, don't even know how to work the political process.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    56. Re:RMS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I attended MIT. Those were the women, dressing that way to confuse Richard enough to sneak out of the room before he walked up to them and ask if he could feel their breasts.

      No, I'm not kidding about Richard asking to feel up women's breasts.

    57. Re:RMS! by Domstersch · · Score: 1

      I'll take this one. Historically, New Zealand has one of the best records of treatment of the indigenous population. You could put it down to the fact that New Zealand was pretty much the last country in the world to be colonized by Empire, and that, by the time it was, humanism was coming into vogue. There was a real recognisation of the effects of disease and the introduction of technology (read: muskets) on Maori - especially amongst the missionaries, who were continually trying to save the noble savages from the depravities of their own cultures. And, while it's historical convention to now deprecate the Declaration of Independence of New Zealand, it still says something important about the nature of early race relations in NZ.

      I mean, sure, there's the New Zealand wars and the subsequent acts of a settler dominated parliament but, honestly, I think you've got New Zealand confused with other British colonies. Australia has 10,000 to 20,000 aboriginal deaths as a result of direct violence, South Africa and America aren't worth getting into. New Zealand's Te Tiriti o Waitangi wasn't really directly adhered to in the next 130 years, it wasn't intended to decieve, and it's a good example of race relations.

      --
      =w=
    58. Re:RMS! by UserGoogol · · Score: 2, Insightful

      RMS is the sort of person who will stand to his principles to the point of absurdity (GNU/Linux, lol) and I would not be surprised if one of RMS's principles is "dressing up for formal occasions is stupid." (Which is not an unreasonable position to hold.)

      So yes, he's being impolite, but I think that saying it's because he's full of himself is to miscontrue the situation slightly.

      --
      "Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity." -- Hanlon's Razor
    59. Re:RMS! by Domstersch · · Score: 1

      Bloody preview button. Why must you mock me so? Declaration of the Independence of New Zealand.

      --
      =w=
    60. Re:RMS! by koreaman · · Score: 0

      You think you've got it bad? I'm American (my name, "koreaman", means nothing), where 100% of the intelligent population hates our President.

    61. Re:RMS! by koreaman · · Score: 0
      Or perhaps,
      Va te faire foutre, putain! Je déteste être dérangé lorsque j'encule ta mère. Ah, mais attendez, je suis désolé d'être si impoli, monsieur. J'ai une question pour vous, M. Stallman. Pourquoi est-ce que votre mère, qui est une vraie allumeuse, a accroché un fils si laid? Oh, j'étais si impoli avant. Je suis désolé de vous tutoyer. Donc, allez vous faire foutre, M. Stallman. Au revoir (même si j'espére qu'il n'y aura pas de revoir). P.S. Vous êtes plus sale que moi même si je suis français!
      Please excuse my shitty French.
    62. Re:RMS! by IDontAgreeWithYou · · Score: 1

      Exactly. This whole thing is a publicity stunt. He went about it in such a manner that he was guaranteed not to get to see the PM, just so he could say that the PM refused to see him. Nice tactics.

      --
      Finding other idiots on /. that agree with your opinion doesn't make it any less stupid.
    63. Re:RMS! by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      Maybe if RMS stepped out of character and did something radical like TAKE A SHOWER, COMB HIS HAIR, and NOT GET HIGH first he might be taken more seriously.

    64. Re:RMS! by russ1337 · · Score: 1

      The Rainbow Warrior bombing did not cause an anti-american backlash.... The Rainbow Warrior bombing was a result of anti-nuclear protests by Greenpeace, and the French felt they could come into our Country and start blowing Greenpeace shit up. That is the reason for anti-French sentiment.

      Any anti-US backlash by New Zealand was because we, (as a democratic nation,) said no to nuclear powered ships and nuclear warheads in NZ ports. The the US then hurt NZ through trade embargo's and pulled out of ANZUS (Defence relationship). New Zealand has an anti-nuclear policy because we believe (as a democratic nation) that "Nuclear war is bad, m-kay'. (There is plenty of good info in wikipedia on both Rainbow Warrior and New Zealands anti-nuc' policy)

      If your referring to my comments, I was trying to explain how some NZ'ers still feel toward the French, by relating it to a US situation. i.e The parent comment was basically saying "that the rainbow warrior attack was ages ago, and [approved] by a previous adminstration - get over it";

      I think is a weak argument. I then stated that if you said similar words to an American about al-quada and 911, you would have a similar response to mine:

      i.e: you shouldn't let a nation / organisation avoid responsibility for its actions by allowing them to say it was the actions of a previous administration.

    65. Re:RMS! by russ1337 · · Score: 1

      ...unless they of course apologize, recognize their mistake and make amends. Germany a good example of doing that since the atrocities of WWII. The French haven't really done too much to make amends - they even let the RW bombers go!

    66. Re:RMS! by Marlow+the+Irelander · · Score: 1

      The difference is that the Jedi-religion thing was a mandatory Government census, whereas this petition was voluntary - it's really really hard to contact millions of people, let alone get them to sign something.

    67. Re:RMS! by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Actually I did read that it did cause an anti-american backlash. No offence was intended. Infact this is from the Wikipedia

      "On 10 July 1985, the French DGSE bombed the Greenpeace protest vessel Rainbow Warrior in Auckland. This event strengthened the nation's resolution to oppose in any form the military application of nuclear technology. The failure of Western leaders to condemn what could be considered an act of war on New Zealand by France caused a great deal of foreign and defence policy change. [1]New Zealand distanced itself from its traditional ally, the United States, and built relationships with small South Pacific nations, while retaining its excellent relations with Australia, and to a lesser extent, the United Kingdom.[2]"

      As the the US pulling out of ANZUS over the anti-nuclear stance that I can explain the US point of view. The US was in a treaty to protect New Zealand. New Zealand was banning nuclear powered ships from docking in New Zealand. That meant that almost no US aircraft carrier or submarine could port in New Zealand. The no Nuclear weapons issue was also a problem in that it would identify which us ships did or did not have nuclear weapons on them.
      The US felt that asking for the US to defend New Zealand when our ships couldn't port there even for repairs wasn't fair. It was not really a mutual defence treaty then. So we decided to pull out of the treaty. I have not seen any thing about a trade embargo on NZ. I did a search on the Internet for New Zealand Trade Embargo but didn't find anything. Do you have a link?
      Why would you get mad because the US decided to nullify it's defence obligations with your nation when your nation decided that it didn't want US Navy ships in it's ports?
      From the US point of view it looks like New Zealand wanted the US to defend them while providing nothing in return.
      On the bright side at least the US military didn't blow up a ship in one of your ports to stop a protest.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    68. Re:RMS! by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      "Are you seriously going to blame that on the current administration?"
      Let's see. The people commited the actual crime got out of "jail" early and have been promoted. The people that ordered it where never put on trial and are still living free in France...
      Can I blame that on them?

      "After the bombing, an immediate murder inquiry was started by the New Zealand Police. Two agents were captured by the prompt actions of a local Neighbourhood Watch, Captain Dominique Prieur and Commander Alain Mafart, passing themselves as "Sophie and Alain Turenge." Both pleaded guilty to manslaughter and were sentenced to 10 years' imprisonment on November 22, 1985.

      In July 1986, a United Nations-sponsored mediation between New Zealand and France resulted in the transfer of the two prisoners to the French Polynesian island of Hao, to serve three years instead, as well as an apology and a NZD 13 million payment from France to New Zealand.

      Mafart returned to Paris on December 14, 1987 for medical treatment, and was apparently freed after treatment. He continued to serve in the French Army, and was promoted to Colonel in 1993. Prieur returned to France on May 6, 1988 because she was pregnant, her husband having been allowed to join her on the atoll. She, too, was freed and later promoted.

      Three other agents, Chief Petty Officer Roland Verge, Petty Officer Bartelo and Petty Officer Gerard Andries, who sailed to New Zealand onboard the yacht Ouvéa, were also captured, but had to be released as New Zealand law did not allow them to be held for sufficient time until the results of forensic tests came back. Knowing the tests would show they had transported the bombs to New Zealand, the crew rendezvoused with a French submarine and sank the Ouvéa. They were never punished.

      As evidence gathered, a superficial commission of enquiry headed by François Tricot cleared the French government of any involvement, claiming that the arrested agents, who had not yet pleaded guilty, had merely been spying on Greenpeace. When The Times and Le Monde claimed that President Mitterrand had approved the bombing plan, Defence Minister Charles Hernu resigned, and the head of the DGSE, Admiral Pierre Lacoste, was fired. Days later, Prime Minister Laurent Fabius admitted that the bombing had been a French plot.
      "

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    69. Re:RMS! by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      I am not a Kiwi. Not that there is anything wrong with being from New Zealand. From what I know it is pretty nice place to live and a pretty good country to be a citizen of.
      Actually I am of Native American decent and a from the US.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    70. Re:RMS! by russ1337 · · Score: 1

      Why would you get mad because the US decided to nullify it's defence obligations....?

      I didnt get mad, it doesnt bother me... I guess PM David Lange expected it when he turned away USS Buchanan.

      I used the wrong term when I said trade embargo. I recall import (to the USA) tariffs were applied (or not removed) to New Zealand products such as lamb & beef (USA's argument to protect its internal market), and I remember our farmers comlaining like hell that it affected them significantly. I did a quick search but dont have a reference. I'll keep an eye out. I dont like making satements I cant back up....

      Glad to see a /.'er takes an interest in NZ - US relations...!

    71. Re:RMS! by russ1337 · · Score: 1

      also hate when i dont preview and miss a /i

    72. Re:RMS! by easter1916 · · Score: 1

      I never said there was anything wrong with being a Kiwi, I merely encouraged you to examine some of the nastier episodes from the past if you're going to drag the French spies/Rainbow Warrior attack up.

    73. Re:RMS! by goldspider · · Score: 1

      "...RMS was acting in a meglamonaical fashion in this particular case."

      Stallman? Megalomaniacal?? Oh God! Say it isn't so!

      --
      "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
  2. They Resisted Something? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    What happened, they were all out of white flags?

    1. Re:They Resisted Something? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  3. RMS Diary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    8am - Wakes up outside the Center for Marxist Education in Cambridge as another bum shits on him. Thinks this sucks and that he would like an apartment, but can't find a landlord with an apartment that is free as in speech and beer. Falls back asleep.

    9am - Wakes up again.

    9:15am - Goes to men's room at MIT to wash shit off. Gives himself sponge bath. Shit comes off (somewhat), but he really isn't clean since he refuses to take a shower.

    9:45am - Decides to shave 2 inches off beard after someone in MIT restroom mistakes him for Osama Bin Laden.

    10am - Goes to McDonalds for breakfast. Gets into arguement with workers behind counter after they refuse to give him a free as in speech and beer breakfast. Also gets into arguement with the manager about why McDonalds should be called GNU/McDonalds due to the fact that he eats there.

    11:30am - After being thrown out of McDonalds since the staff doesn't want a DGH deterring lunch rush, RMS goes to the McDonalds' dumpster to find food. Eats a "GNU/Quarter Pounder" and "GNU/fries" covered with "GNU/mold". He consideres the food better since it is free as in speech and beer.

    12:30am - Goes back to MIT to recruit MIT students into writing free software. RMS is unable to enter anyone's office since everyone has placed spider plants in their offices. (He has a phobia a spider plants.)

    1pm - RMS protests GWB (George W. Bush) for not being GNU/GWB and believing in copyrights. Wanders out of Cambridge and into Waltham. Police find RMS and arrest him for violating the ordinance that says he is not allowed to enter Waltham. (All towns surrounding Cambridge have this ordinace.) Police beat him and deport him back to Cambridge.

    3pm - Goes back to MIT and creates a plan for dealing with overpopulation by killing everyone who uses non-free software. Writes code into next version of emacs to implement that feature

    5pm - Tries to read email. RMS finds out he is dangerously over quota due to an email from Doctress Neutopia. This email is 65 megabytes of nothing but ASCII text. It is similar to an email he gets everyday since 1995 when he and Docress Neutopia had a brief fling. The email says that she would like to have a relationship with him, but he needs to accept her lovoution, stop his polygamous goat fucking and clean off the hair, dirt, food, and feces off his keyboard. RMS responds with a 9 megabyte email (of nothing but text) explaining that he could only consider getting into a relationship with her if she changed her name to GNU/Doctress Neutopia.

    5:30pm - Reads rest of his email. His email is bombarded with trolls and goatse. RMS is turned on by the goatse and beats off to it.

    6pm - Still beating off to goatse

    7pm - Still beating off to goatse

    8pm - Still beating off to goatse

    9pm - Breaks into MIT vending machine to have a free as in speech and beer snack.

    10pm - Breaks into a liquor store for free as in speech and free as in beer beer. Gets drunk.

    10:15pm - Walks around drunk yelling, "Use free software!!!!", "It's GNU/Linux you capitalist pigs!!!!" and "I am a goat fucker!!!!".

    11:45pm - Collapses in front of the Center for Marxist Education. Goes to sleep.

    1. Re:RMS Diary by Viol8 · · Score: 1

      "Falls back asleep."

      Funny , thats just what happened to me before I even got close to the
      end of this lame excuse for "humour" which the poster has obviously been
      saving for a rainy day to cut and paste. Sad.

    2. Re:RMS Diary by renehollan · · Score: 1
      10pm - Breaks into a liquor store for free as in speech and free as in beer beer. Gets drunk.

      If you're gonna troll, troll right. While it's fine to parody or satire, inacuracies greatly reduce the chance of the troll catching a newb unawares:

      RMS does not drink beer.

      --
      You could've hired me.
    3. Re:RMS Diary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RMS does not drink beer..

      Yet he suffers from the poor hygeine and physical effects of a long term beer drinker.
      Talk about both getting shafted by both ends of the stick.

      And when you're going to visit a leader of a country, please try playing the part. I know it's cool to act like you're a free hippy and you can do whatever you want, but there is a layer of politics and crap you have to do to play ball in the same court as those kinds of people. You can't change the rules, until you play the game. and RMS just seems to be on the outside looking in, please start coding again.

    4. Re:RMS Diary by renehollan · · Score: 1
      Yet he suffers from the poor hygeine and physical effects of a long term beer drinker.

      Actually, I think his vice is sweets, though that is from a limited observation. And, while I've noticed that he perspires like the rest of us, I've not seen evidence that he is unclean. Perhaps he shuns deoderants and antipersperants. These have been shown to be worse for hygine in the long run than daily showering.

      And when you're going to visit a leader of a country, please try playing the part.

      I dunno. I see your point, but 165000 signatures on a petition should speak for themselves. Frankly, I think a representative of the people (at least the 165000 signatories) should look like one of them. His co-delegates appears respectible, if casual.

      In my opinion, it matters not what one looks like, it matters how one acts: polite but firm strikes me as reasonable.

      Frankly, the French P.M. dropped the ball on this one. His office should (a) have known that RMS is not a nobody, (b) been aware of the scope of the petition, (c) sent a reasonably high-ranking official to receive the delegation, (d) apologize for the PM's personal absense, and accept the petition.

      --
      You could've hired me.
    5. Re:RMS Diary by DamnStupidElf · · Score: 1

      RMS does not drink beer.

      Hmm, uncut hair, no beer... All he needs is a camel's hair tunic and he can be the reincarnation of John the Baptist; "Repent and turn to GNU/Linux!"

    6. Re:RMS Diary by renehollan · · Score: 1
      All he needs is a camel's hair tunic and he can be the reincarnation of John the Baptist...

      Heh.

      I did once refer to him as an "evangelical atheist", the oxymoron being intentional.

      --
      You could've hired me.
    7. Re:RMS Diary by dbIII · · Score: 1
      have known that RMS is not a nobody
      To the French Minister for technology he may be somebody but to the Prime Minister he IS a nobody. He would just look like an angry American who hasn't even bothered to work out the basics of who to talk to but wants attention from the very top.
  4. Pushed back? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You mean knocked back, right? I expect that the choice of words was by a French person, but Hemos, isn't it your job to fix things like this? Just because the original article uses bad English, it doesn't mean Slashdot has to.

    1. Re:Pushed back? by gowen · · Score: 1

      Hey! That's not fair.

      Slashdot editors have been using bad English for years before this article came along.

      --
      Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
    2. Re:Pushed back? by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      I think a more likely translation would be turned away.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  5. No appointment and he was pushed back? Horror! by ucahg · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Failing to have an appointment organized with the Prime Minister, Richard Stallman then decided to go to the ministry at Matignon (the place where French Prime minister works) on Friday 9th of June at 3h30 pm, with the printed list of the 165 000 signatures of EUCD.INFO petition and to try to be received by the Prime Minister and to deliver the EUCD.INFO petition (printed on a 17 meters long banner).


    Is this really a news story? Someone without an appointment tries to seek a personal audience with a world leader and is denied? That's not anti-DRM, it's just common sense.
  6. Uh, no surprises here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    You show up at a major countries statehouse and demand entry and some security guard tells you to get an appointment, no big surprises here.

    1. Re:Uh, no surprises here by Moderatbastard · · Score: 0
      You show up at a major countries statehouse

      One, it's "a major country's".
      Two, they probably don't call it a statehouse.
      Three, it isn't a major country's statehouse, it's France's.


      Informative? I don't think so.

      --
      1/3 of jokes get modded OT. If you get the joke, mod 1 in 3 insightful/interesting/underrated to restore karma balance.
    2. Re:Uh, no surprises here by gorbachev · · Score: 1

      You show up at a major countries statehouse...looking like a hobo...

      --
      In Soviet Russia, I ruled you
    3. Re:Uh, no surprises here by rjdegraaf · · Score: 1

      You show up at a major countries statehouse and demand entry and some security guard tells you to get an appointment, no big surprises here.

      What if you never can get an appointment?

    4. Re:Uh, no surprises here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It should be possible to turn up with a petition. Only a few years ago (well, probably well over a decade, now), it used to be "normal" to turn up at No 10 in the UK with a petition signed by 90,000 people on some subject. It would be taken in by some low level civil servant and the papers would be taking photos.

      Nowadays, you'd get chivvied out of there in case there was a bomb in the box...

    5. Re:Uh, no surprises here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then it looks like you don't get to see the person you want to see. Believe it or not, but sometimes people don't want to talk to you and in this case RMS gets to see that in action.

      Too many people are carrying on about "but, he sent a letter 15 days ago". Well, whoop-de-doo. I can't even get an appointment with my dentist with a 15 day notice and a major political figure probably has a schedule well in advance of 15 days.

      Sorry to say, but not every gets an audience. So, he had a list with 165,000 signatures? So what? In the grand scheme of things that isn't really a large number. That would be good enough to get consideration for a potential ballot measure in some states. That's still a far cry from a personal audience with a political figure.

      RMS wanted to be seen. The PM didn't want to see him. Move on and realize you are NOT the most important person in the world and that some people could really care less about what you might have to say. It probably caused some great pain on the ego to realize he is not as important as he thinks he is.

    6. Re:Uh, no surprises here by amliebsch · · Score: 1

      You send a letter or meet with a staffer.

      --
      If you don't know where you are going, you will wind up somewhere else.
    7. Re:Uh, no surprises here by loraksus · · Score: 1

      No kidding. I was there a couple weeks ago and the entire street was blocked off by 25 foot fences and guards with mp5s.

      --
      1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
    8. Re:Uh, no surprises here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PM security guards where aware that RMS were coming and they intercepted him 100 meters from Matignon. So why the prime minister hasn't replied to the request for appointment? A security guard says that they were not going to receive him on purpose. So it was a decision from the prime minister to not receive himn decision taken before RMS tries to come to Matignon.

  7. Get a haircut! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One look at RMS and they thought he was a terrorist!

    1. Re:Get a haircut! by jest3r · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I would "push them back" too.
      Stallman looks like a street bum wearing clean clothes. When visiting the leader of a country he should at least get a garter belt to suck in that beer gut .. and shear off the out of control hair. I don't want to know what he's got hidden in the beard ... leftovers?

    2. Re:Get a haircut! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He fits in fine with parisians.

    3. Re:Get a haircut! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, shaving is prohibited by a number of religions, Jewish and Sikh being obvious examples, although some Christians and Muslims argue against it also since it is banned in the Bible.

  8. Great Photos by Doomedsnowball · · Score: 1

    The photos were great, but I had trouble downloading the license to read the DRM'd text.

    --
    7h3$3 4r3n'7 7h3 Ðr01Ð$ ¥0 4r3 £00|{1n9 f0r. M0v3 4£0n9. --OB1
  9. What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    An uninvited guest gently removed from the vicinity of a major politician by security forces?

    Colour me shocked.

  10. Tag: Obvious by roman_mir · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The delegation led by Richard Stallman was kindly but firmly pushed back by the chief of security team of French Prime minister saying : the decision not to receive Richard Stallman was mature considered .

    In the PCInpact article Frédéric Couchet, from FSF France, evokes the difference in treatment between the reception of Bill Gates as a Head of State by the president of the Republic and that of Richard Stallman by the chief of the security team of Matignon . Richard Stallman believes to have the explanation: Gates is the emperor, we are only citizens , he said.
    - duh. Earth to RMS: some French dude, who happens to be a PM of France doesn't HAVE to listen to you and choses not to listen to you, but if you offer money he may reconsider, are you surprised?

    (note: I am not saying BG offered money, I am saying BG is seen as someone, who can bring monetary advantages to a country.)

    1. Re:Tag: Obvious by Pecisk · · Score: 1

      PM has to represent his people, NOT to take interest of ANY person who can *theoretically* bring monetary advantages to a country. And ohh, buy the way, Microsoft in Eirope uses Irland as a proxy, therefore not paying ANY taxes as company. Saying that Microsoft presence in market benefits country is hyprotical at it's best, if not outright lying.

      --
      user@ubuntubox:~$ stfu This server is going down for shutdown NOW!
    2. Re:Tag: Obvious by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      Saying that Microsoft presence in market benefits country is hyprotical at it's best, if not outright lying. - right, except that you are conveniently forgetting to mention that MS employ thousands of people and thus in fact do increase the total value of the market. Who is lying here?

    3. Re:Tag: Obvious by A.K.A_Magnet · · Score: 1
      (note: I am not saying BG offered money, I am saying BG is seen as someone, who can bring monetary advantages to a country.)
      Yeah, but RMS has brought more money into the country than Bill Gates; Bill Gates drives french money out of the country, while RMS gave Free Software (with all the business and *SAVINGs* [yeah, savings aren't producing money, but it's still money] AND *SOFTWARE INDEPENDANCE*). There are *many many* French software vendors dedicated to Free Software now and they're a huge actor in the french IT/CS landscape. Prime Minister's De Villepin supposedly all for free software ("logiciel libre"), but he really means open source, even if he can't understand (and doesn't care) the difference.

      Anyway, the whole governement is hellish so nobody should be surprised.
    4. Re:Tag: Obvious by Pecisk · · Score: 1

      MS employ thousands of people IN US and INDIA. Where is there thousands for Microsoft working in France? Do Microsoft have jobs in France? I don't think so.

      And please stop play - ohhh, Microsoft is so great to bring benifits for local economy crap - it is pure PR and Microsoft and even everone in goverment knows it. Microsoft abuse laws of monopoly and copyright when it suits them and believe me, all world economy would be much better without them. And it is not my thoughts, but serious economical specialists which says that.

      --
      user@ubuntubox:~$ stfu This server is going down for shutdown NOW!
    5. Re:Tag: Obvious by easter1916 · · Score: 1

      >buy the way, Microsoft in Eirope uses Irland as a proxy, therefore not paying ANY taxes as company.

      Uses Ireland as a proxy in the sense that they based most of their European business there. Somehow I think you're more concerned with our undercutting taxes whereever you're from (I'm guessing one of the high-tax countries). Ireland certainly does not wander around cheerleading for MS in the EU Parliament or Commission. Your attitude suggests you disagree with our policy of low taxation (12.5%). Low taxation is not no taxation. I suppose MS uses Ireland as a "proxy" in the same way that Siemens uses Germany or ABB uses Sweden. Of course, I disagree with high taxation, since we already tried that in Ireland and it lead to 18% unemployment in the mid-80s.

    6. Re:Tag: Obvious by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1
      Where is there thousands for Microsoft working in France? Do Microsoft have jobs in France? I don't think so.

      I'm not French, I'm Australian, but I can say in my career I have visited Microsoft premises in Melbourne and Sydney, each with several hundred employees. You're uninformed if you believe all of Microsoft is encapsulated an hour out of Seattle, and Bangalore.

    7. Re:Tag: Obvious by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1
      Please. You make it sound like RMS was the only person on the planet possibly capable of offering Free Software. Here's a hint: people write software that they intend to distribute for free. They then might see the GPL and say, "Hey, this saves me the trouble of getting a license drawn up". You're putting the cart before the horse. It is not the existence of the GPL that encourages people to write software and give it away. It's called volunteering, of a sort, and is as old as civilisation. People didn't sit around twiddling thumbs, unwilling or unable to write free code but for the FSF.

      No, I don't discount some of the valuable things RMS has done, but he's not some General who has singlehandedly marshalled an army of coders and lead them in a charge.

    8. Re:Tag: Obvious by A.K.A_Magnet · · Score: 1

      He created and popularized the movement, and the GPL *is* unvaluable. It's a clever idea and nobody can say it would exist anyway without RMS.

    9. Re:Tag: Obvious by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1
      Are you saying RMS is the first person to /ever/ give away for free the source to something he wrote?

      And I never said the GPL would exist without him - I said its existence wasn't required to introduce to people the concept of giving source code away for free.

    10. Re:Tag: Obvious by A.K.A_Magnet · · Score: 1

      I already had this discussion here on /. :) I am myself (and maybe you are) a free software developer; and even if /I/ code and /I/ release this code, I'm greatful for RMS and I think his contribution is a cause of mine. The GPL and GNU itself are incredible incentives to release code as free. RMS evangelism and speeches were and still are prevalent in the free software community, and more generally to all programmers and computer scientists, imho.

  11. Shocking by I+Like+Pudding · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    You would think the French and RMS would get along better what with both of them having so much in common. The odor, the excessive body hair, the truly MASSIVE egos, the inability to compromise - oh, wait, there's the problem.

    1. Re:Shocking by I+Like+Pudding · · Score: 4, Funny

      Flamebait my ass. If making fun of the French is wrong, I don't want to be right.

    2. Re:Shocking by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      It's not the making fun of the French that got you that mod.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    3. Re:Shocking by I+Like+Pudding · · Score: 1

      Bah. Joke about the sacred cow and get modded into oblivion. Complain about the moderation and get modded offtopic. Prepend a comment with "I'm going to get modded down for saying this" and get a +1, insightful. Such is the tao of Slashdot.

      I admit my original comment was flamebait, but, damn it, it was funny flamebait.

    4. Re:Shocking by Trogre · · Score: 1

      Bah, you're just bitter that they invented the metric system.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  12. He Was Not Invited, And Wanted An Audience... by Real+World+Stuff · · Score: 4, Insightful

    with a head of state. This was simply a stunt to gain exposure. I am all for supporting the proliferation of free software and the free software movement, but this will only marginalize the cause yet once again at the hands of RMS.

    --
    If we don't fight for ourselves no one will.
  13. wow, big shock there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You don't just come up to the President of France / USA / anywhere and start chatting about open sores. If ANYONE did that to chat about ANYTHING they would be pushed back, it's called basic security precautions. Kudos to the French security team for being on the ball.

    1. Re:wow, big shock there by raddan · · Score: 1

      Oh, that's the problem! They thought he was coming to talk about his open sores movement! I'd tell him to step away, too.

    2. Re:wow, big shock there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would've had an insider steal all the prime-ministerial toilet paper, then waited outside the toilet window with that petition.

      'Oh so NOW you want to see us..'

  14. Lucky he wasn't shot... by Manip · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So Richard Stallman approached the French Prime Minister's delegation, and tried to force their way though to have a private word with him about DRM laws? ...

    Even outside of politics that isn't acceptable behaviour. How would you feel if you ran a business and as you left the office the CEO of another company was trying to convince you to sell your shares to him, following you about and such? ... That just isn't normal behaviour.

    Normal people make a meeting... Or if failing that they write the grievance down and hand deliver it. They don't make a run at the guy, and try and get it words and then act like a victim when it doesn't work.

    Damn right the security pushed him back... He should have been asked to leave if he acts like that.

    1. Re:Lucky he wasn't shot... by jeremie_z_ · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually many associations (APRIL, FSF France, EUCD.INFO) wrote many letters to ask for an interview between the prime minister and RMS. Actually none of them was answered.

      Letters were sent a few days ago to tell the day and hour of his coming (he flew from Boston especially for this occasion), so he wasn't exactly "forcing his way" and the guards said that de decision to refuse him was "maturely decided"... This is a political decision of not receiving him, and nothing else.

    2. Re:Lucky he wasn't shot... by hahiss · · Score: 5, Insightful


      Well, one difference is that the PM is in charge of a democracy, whereas the two people in your analogy are economic competitors. One might reasonably be inclined to think that those in charge of a democracy have some duty to listen to their citizens, and one might also wonder just how accessible our ``leaders" are these days. (I live in Texas, and I'm way to the left. Do you think I'm going to get an audience with my insanely conservative senators to explain why they should support net neutrality or abortion rights or drug legalization or gay marriage? Yeah, ``make an appointment"---that's a great idea.)

      Of course, RMS is not a citizen of France (though other members of the delegation are), and we can always debate the effectiveness of any particular political action/stunt. But the idea that he was just being rude because he was demanding attention from the elected leaders of a democracy is the kind of notion that ensures that the status quo (and whoever owns it) rules the day.

      --
      "Every decent man is ashamed of the government he lives under." - H.L. Mencken
    3. Re:Lucky he wasn't shot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RMS is a crank. Heads of state don't have time to have a meeting with every nutjob that wants a few words.

    4. Re:Lucky he wasn't shot... by jalet · · Score: 1
      > Actually none of them was answered.

      You wonder why, here's an explanation : RMS is a genius, but our "beloved" prime minister clearly is not.

      Maybe he didn't want to look stupid when asked some questions about DRM...

      --
      Votez ecolo : Chiez dans l'urne !
    5. Re:Lucky he wasn't shot... by Jtheletter · · Score: 1

      Normal people make a meeting... Or if failing that they write the grievance down and hand deliver it.

      Funny, having read the article I thought that was exactly what happened.

      --
      -- I'm not a pessimist, I'm a realist. It's not my fault that life sucks so much. --
    6. Re:Lucky he wasn't shot... by amliebsch · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Do you think I'm going to get an audience with my insanely conservative senators to explain why they should support net neutrality or abortion rights or drug legalization or gay marriage? Yeah, ``make an appointment"---that's a great idea.)

      I mean this in all seriousness - have you tried? Have you met with the staffers? Have you written letters? Or are you using your assumptions of failure as a reason not to make the effort?

      --
      If you don't know where you are going, you will wind up somewhere else.
    7. Re:Lucky he wasn't shot... by themusicgod1 · · Score: 1

      Even outside of politics that isn't acceptable behaviour. How would you feel if you ran a business and as you left the office the CEO of another company was trying to convince you to sell your shares to him, following you about and such? ... That just isn't normal behaviour.

      And 150,000 of your shareholders have a written their names in support to demand change? I think you're missing a pretty big part in your analogy here. This is holding a supposedly democratic head of state to the will of his own people.

      --
      GENERATION 26: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation.
    8. Re:Lucky he wasn't shot... by MonsoonDawn · · Score: 1

      Then let's a call a spade a spade here. This was a cheap childish PR stunt because previous half-assed attempts failed. It takes a damn long time to get access to the head of an State. You start with lower level representatives and civil servants. You don't try to cut to the front of the line for anything other than some ink and glossy photos.

    9. Re:Lucky he wasn't shot... by dbIII · · Score: 1
      Letters were sent a few days ago to tell the day and hour of his coming (he flew from Boston especially for this occasion), so he wasn't exactly "forcing his way"
      Yes he was - if your name isn't on the list you don't get in and if you refuse to even wear a name tag for political reasons even more so.

      Someone from my country (Australia) a while back stood outside the White House and politely asked to see George Bush. While he was standing there waiting he was crash tackled and his bags were blown up - it made impressive news footage. If you turn up to see a nations leader without an appointment you can't expect them to see you even if you think you are the next best thing to Nelson Mandela.

    10. Re:Lucky he wasn't shot... by bsartist · · Score: 1

      Then read the article again. RMS didn't make a meeting, he decided on a date and informed the PM that he would be arriving. And he wrote his "grievance" down on a yards-long banner, and arrived to the "meeting" dressed like a hobo. This was not an attempt to start a serious dialogue about a political issue, it was just cheap theatrics.

      --
      Lost: Sig, white with black letters. No collar. Reward if found!
    11. Re:Lucky he wasn't shot... by hahiss · · Score: 1


      This is *totally* a fair question. Yes, I've tried, though perhaps I've not gone all aggro about it. (In my defense, part of this is because I lived in Washington, DC for about a decade, and DC has no real representation in government.) Letters get form letters in response, and Texas is a state where people who share my views are few and far in between; representative government being what it is, one oughtn't to expect to get too far in such cases.

      As an aside: my favorite response (though obviously not to my own letter) was a local talk radio host who wrote a letter to one of Texas's senators about FCC censorship (saying he was against it), and she wrote back saying she was worried about the airwaves just like he is---and wanted to make sure that they were censored even more. I laughed, then I cried, and then I drank some Shiner Bock.

      --
      "Every decent man is ashamed of the government he lives under." - H.L. Mencken
    12. Re:Lucky he wasn't shot... by Cederic · · Score: 1


      >> Do you think I'm going to get an audience with my insanely conservative senators to explain why they should support net neutrality or abortion rights or drug legalization or gay marriage? Yeah, ``make an appointment"---that's a great idea.)

      Try moving to a democracy. All I need to do to meet with my MP is write and ask him. Or (since his address is known) walk down the road and knock on his door at 8pm when I know he's not at parliament. Or go to parliament. Or attend a local 'surgery'.

      I haven't personally met with him (although I have met and chatted to other MPs) but I have written to him a few times, and received a few replies.

    13. Re:Lucky he wasn't shot... by bsartist · · Score: 3, Insightful

      One might reasonably be inclined to think that those in charge of a democracy have some duty to listen to their citizens

      In theory, yes. In practice, there's no way a senior official can personally meet each and every citizen and discuss his or her concerns with them. That's why different levels of government and "official channels" exist - you start with the secretary (or whatever) and someone at each level decides whether the matter can be handled at that level, or kicked up to the next. You'd be amazed how many nutjobs want to go directly to the President to discuss issues that would be more appropriate for their city's Mayor. It's almost like a DDOS attack on the bureacracy - it makes it much more difficult for a legitimate request to work its way through.

      All told, only an idiot would seriously expect to receive an appointment with a senior official on two weeks notice, and I don't think RMS is an idiot. This looks to me like he knew full well he wouldn't get in, so he made a cheap publicity stunt out of it. Unfortunately for the "movement", this stunt puts him on about the same level as the guy who climbed Buckingham Palace in a superhero (Batman, I think...) costume.

      --
      Lost: Sig, white with black letters. No collar. Reward if found!
    14. Re:Lucky he wasn't shot... by bogado · · Score: 1
      On Friday, June 9th 2006 at 3.30pm, after sending several unanswered letters asking for an interview, and after warning of his coming, Richard Stallman led a delegation composed by Frédéric Couchet (Free Software Foundation France) and Christophe Espern (EUCD.INFO initiative) to meet the French Prime minister.


      this came from the article, it states that he did sended several letters asking for an appointment, none of the letters were answered so he sent a warning of his comming. This sounds to me like a frustade attempt to make an appointement.

      This "deliver in hands" routine is a last attempt to get the message, I believe that everyone in the party wasn't expecting to get to acomplish the meeting. But this is the last line, it is a political movement that says, or should say, to everyone that reads it that this administration has it's door closed to the needs of the consumers and is more avid to discuss police with Bill Gates then with their citzens that RMS were representing, when he took those hundred of thousand signatures.
      --
      []'s Victor Bogado da Silva Lins

      ^[:wq

    15. Re:Lucky he wasn't shot... by hahiss · · Score: 1


      Funny, my conservative neighbors keep telling me the same thing!

      --
      "Every decent man is ashamed of the government he lives under." - H.L. Mencken
    16. Re:Lucky he wasn't shot... by Jtheletter · · Score: 1
      FTFA: On Friday, June 9th 2006 at 3.30pm, after sending several unanswered letters asking for an interview, and after warning of his coming, Richard Stallman [...] a roll of paper containing the names of the 165,000 individual signatures and 1000 collective signatures [...] The FSF France received no answer (neither negative nor positive) from Prime Minister.

      So yes, they did attempt to set up a meeting but were given no response, so they sent word on what time and date they would attempt to meet inperson to present their grievance - which was some 165,000 names of French citizens who had signed a petition. That many signatures takes up a lot of paper, he chose to print it to a roll rather than a full reem of 8.5x11, I don't really see how that has any bearing. Also, his coice of dress - while terrible for meeting with any politician, let alone the PM of another country - is netiher directly relevent to our conversation, nor is it that of a hobo since it's what you can see anywhere in corporate America on a casual Friday.

      To sum up: the FSF and Stallman sent a number of letters asking for an interview but were ignored. They then provided written notice of their coming, so as not to be mistaken for hooligans and shot or otherwise. And they brought with them a list of 165,000 people who agreed with their grievance on DRM and had it printed in an obscure but rather formal looking format.

      So explain to me again how this is not attempting to make a meeting, then failing that, attempting to present the grievance in person? If this were truly merely theatrics to get themselves noticed don't you think they would have alerted any media whatsoever to cover the event? Instead it looks like someone from their group, or at best a single reporter, snapped some digital photos, hardly a publicity stunt.

      Also I would say that anytime 165,000 of a country's citizens sign a petition and work to have it presented to their representative leaders, that is attempting to start a serious dialogue about an issue.

      --
      -- I'm not a pessimist, I'm a realist. It's not my fault that life sucks so much. --
    17. Re:Lucky he wasn't shot... by Ricwot · · Score: 1

      Still beaten by Eric Forth MP, who, when faced with a letter by a woman about her son's inability to afford a house where he grew up, Forth replied "I suggest your son gets a house in a grottier part of town."

    18. Re:Lucky he wasn't shot... by Cederic · · Score: 1


      wtf has 'conservative' got to do with it? You start letters with

      "Dear Bigoted Religious Nazi Freak,
      I am a hippie peace loving magic mushroom eater that thinks Bush is the satanic love-child of Nicole Kidman and Pol Pot. I am writing to berate you regarding your incomprehensible policies in the hopes you will commit ritualised suicide."

      or something?

      Try
      "Dear Congressman Thingy,
      I understand the are examining the issue of in the near future. I would be grateful for the opportunity to discuss this matter with you, as it has considerable impact on myself and my . I appreciate you have many demands on your time and would be delighted to meet you at your office at a time convenient to yourself."

      Or as I initially suggested, find a democracy to live in.

    19. Re:Lucky he wasn't shot... by hahiss · · Score: 1


      Actually, I was making a joke by AGREEING with you! My conservative neighbors (NEIGHBORS, not my representatives) have this thing about people who criticize American democracy. They tell me to love it or leave it, or if I love country X's policies so much I should move there.

      Much like, um, you suggested that I should find a democracy to live. That's what conservativism has to do with it. I expect that there are conservatives everywhere, that not all conservatives are assholes, etc. But everyone keeps fucking telling me to move, which is of course to abandon others who might agree.

      So, thanks for nothing jackass; actually, less than nothing, since you offered useless advice AND were an ass. Well done.

      --
      "Every decent man is ashamed of the government he lives under." - H.L. Mencken
    20. Re:Lucky he wasn't shot... by hahiss · · Score: 1


      Oh. My. God. I surrender. I'll have to use that example in my political philosophy class next year. . . .

      --
      "Every decent man is ashamed of the government he lives under." - H.L. Mencken
    21. Re:Lucky he wasn't shot... by Cederic · · Score: 1


      Thank you. I appreciate your kind words.

    22. Re:Lucky he wasn't shot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      So Richard Stallman approached the French Prime Minister's delegation, and tried to force their way though to have a private word with him about DRM laws? ...

      Even outside of politics that isn't acceptable behaviour...

      Normal people make a meeting... Or if failing that they write the grievance down and hand deliver it. They don't make a run at the guy, and try and get it words and then act like a victim when it doesn't work.

      In Flint, Michigan we have name for that kind of behavior: "Michael Moore antics."
    23. Re:Lucky he wasn't shot... by The+Cydonian · · Score: 1
      In practice, there's no way a senior official can personally meet each and every citizen and discuss his or her concerns with them.
      In India and even in a (an allegedly) 'controlled democracy' such as Singapore, Members of Legislative Assembly/Parliament have weekly meet-the-people sessions where regular folk can meet their representatives to discuss issues of their concern. The reason they do this is not just to ensure voter loyalty, but more importantly, to give a certain human touch to an essentially face-less bureaucracy.

      Frankly, I'm of the opinion that meeting their constituents on a regular basis is part of any representative's job description, and find it ludicrous that anyone thinks it isn't.

      (Which, of course, is not to say that the French PM should have met RMS; goes without saying that there's a PR stunt involved here).

    24. Re:Lucky he wasn't shot... by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1
      Letters were sent a few days ago to tell the day and hour of his coming

      Yeah, because I'm sure the Prime Minister of a country can rearrange his schedule at a "few" days notice to receive a petition.

      he flew from Boston especially for this occasion

      He chose to buy a plane ticket without acceptance of his invitation, and expects that this then obligates said Prime Minister to do the aforementioned rearranging of schedule?

      political decision of not receiving him, and nothing else

      Several THOUSAND, if not tens of thousands of people, every year, make requests to see the Prime Minister and have them turned down. What makes this case so special? The petition? The online petition where I seriously doubt that any more than a fraction of said 'signatories' are even French? I wonder how many mailing lists, forums, IRC channels, email sigs had it passed around - "Hey! Sign this! Protect our right to copy things" (Yeah, okay, this last is a little inflammatory, but you know it's probably also quite accurate for a proportion of the cases).

    25. Re:Lucky he wasn't shot... by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1
      should of worked

      Apropos of the troll: should have worked.

  15. Big petition by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 0

    Wow that petition is long.

    --
    "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
  16. At least he could dress a little better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He looks like a haggard bum next to the two other guys. At least he could have worn a suit!

  17. no offense to RMS by asv108 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    but he is the last person that should be representing the free software community to politicians. You need a clean cut person in a suit who is familiar with the politics of that nation. Why do think people hire lobbyists instead of appealing to politicians directly?

    1. Re:no offense to RMS by myspys · · Score: 1

      ehm, what about this oh-so-crazy idea: the PEOPLE should represent the PEOPLE

    2. Re:no offense to RMS by thrillseeker · · Score: 1

      Why do think people hire lobbyists instead of appealing to politicians directly?

      For the same reason people don't like making their own sausage - they have the same lack of stomach (ha!) for grinding pig intestines that they do for placing a hundred thousand bucks in the politician's reelection fund.

    3. Re:no offense to RMS by Bogtha · · Score: 1

      You need a clean cut person in a suit who is familiar with the politics of that nation.

      So politicians should ignore people who don't dress in suits? I expect you think that Gandhi should have been ignored because he was just a tramp in a loincloth, right?

      --
      Bogtha Bogtha Bogtha
    4. Re:no offense to RMS by IWantMoreSpamPlease · · Score: 1

      That's a fine idea, provided you do it the right way. Which apparently RMS is not.

      --
      So rise up, all ye lost ones, as one, we'll claw the clouds.
    5. Re:no offense to RMS by winkydink · · Score: 1

      Hmm... I've made my own sausage many times and have never used pig intestines as part of the stuffing (the part that needs to be ground). The intestines are used for the casing, if at all.

      --

      "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    6. Re:no offense to RMS by amliebsch · · Score: 1

      It's not a question of should. It's an observation of reality: taking the time to make formal niceties and observe even pointless protocol is a signal to your intended audience that you are serious and value their time.

      --
      If you don't know where you are going, you will wind up somewhere else.
    7. Re:no offense to RMS by kwoff · · Score: 1

      And then you wonder why politicians are phony assholes.

    8. Re:no offense to RMS by saleenS281 · · Score: 1

      because it's easier to hide corruption when you cover it up with lobbyists like Abrahamoff.

    9. Re:no offense to RMS by Bogtha · · Score: 1

      I think that the point at which formal niceties were important was passed when all the requests for an audience weren't even dignified with a response. It doesn't matter how much "pointless protocol" is observed, wearing a suit while you barge in uninvited doesn't make it any more polite.

      --
      Bogtha Bogtha Bogtha
    10. Re:no offense to RMS by chris_7d0h · · Score: 1

      I agree. I don't understand why the FSF isn't sendng Eben Moglen to important meetings like this instead of RMS. Eben is both extremely well spoken and dress for the occasion (being a lawyer after all).

      --
      In a society that believes in nothing, fear becomes the only agenda ~ Bill Durodié
    11. Re:no offense to RMS by professionalfurryele · · Score: 1

      Value their time? Value their time? They are politicians! They should value OUR time! If politicians are so short sighted and arrogant as to believe anyone from the unwashed masses is just ignorable, even when they represent upward of 100,000 people, I suggest it's time we got some new politicians.

    12. Re:no offense to RMS by turgid · · Score: 1

      This is France we're talking about.

      /me ducks.

    13. Re:no offense to RMS by amliebsch · · Score: 1
      Value their time? They are politicians! They should value OUR time!


      Is there some law of nature that precludes both parties from simultaneously recognizing the the value of time of each other?

      Consider this: if RMS had actually gotten his appointment, do you think the PM would have worn a suit?

      End even after all that, even if you don't value the other person's time at all - if you want to persuade them, wouldn't you rationally pretend that you do?

      --
      If you don't know where you are going, you will wind up somewhere else.
    14. Re:no offense to RMS by professionalfurryele · · Score: 1

      Ahhhh, now if the criticism is of the tactics, then I can see your point. That is fair enough. RMS isn't picking his battles, I don't know if he should be or not. As to valuing a politicians time. It isn't their time, it's my time, I pay thier wages and (unlike other public sector workers) I am their boss (along with 59,999,999 subjects of Her Majesty) and when I or my fellow subject address our representatives with the backing of a sizeable subset of the population of the kingdom on a rights issue, then we will wear what I damn well like and they can lump it. This is tantamount to the boss coming around to your office to give you a thorough telling off for watching porn all Friday afternoon in the office because you couldn't be bothered to do your work and then missed a deadline.

    15. Re:no offense to RMS by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1
      Refresh my memory, it appears to have gone a little hazy:

      At what point was RMS granted French citizenship? You know, to become a PERSON of France?

    16. Re:no offense to RMS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Consider this: if RMS had actually gotten his appointment, do you think the PM would have worn a suit?

      So basically, you are asking us to pretend that the Prime Minister valued Stallman's time enough to wear a suit, when he didn't even value Stallman's time enough to have his secretary send a rejection letter?

      And Stallman is in the wrong because in this make-believe world, the Prime Minister would value Stallman's time? Even though in the real world he was a hell of a lot more rude than not wearing a suit?

      You are twisting and turning the facts upside down and inventing scenarios to try and criticise Stallman when it's abundantly clear that what he was wearing wouldn't have made the slightest bit of difference, and where the Prime Minister is unreservedly in the wrong and being far more rude that Stallman could possibly be. Why are you twisting the facts this way?

  18. Rough security by phillips321 · · Score: 1
    Richard Stallman and his friends were pushed back by the chief of security team.
    Being man-handled again are we? Next time take some reinforcements http://www.answers.com/topic/slingshot
    1. Re:Rough security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or, call for reinforcements.

  19. newsflash by abigsmurf · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Disgruntled man stopped by security when he barged his way to French parliment and demanded to see a top MP! This is really a piece of non-news. Just because he's got a petition doesn't give him the right to see them. If he really wanted action to take place he'd organise a series of protests that can't just be turned away.

    1. Re:newsflash by phillips321 · · Score: 1

      Why protest. Negative publicity might not look too good in the PM's eyes. (and there are allways a few idiots who want to turn a peaceful protest into chaos)

    2. Re:newsflash by abigsmurf · · Score: 1

      protests get the issue in the public domain. Do you think the general public (who dont visit tech news sites) will hear anything about this denied meeting? DRM relies on public ignorance to propogate, if a good portion of the country take offence to it, it can't survive. Look at the Sony fiasco for a good example of this

    3. Re:newsflash by Salsaman · · Score: 1

      But this is RMS, arguably one of the most important figures in modern computing , and one of the most prominent figures in the field of "Practical Philosophy" (i.e. author of the GPL).

      Can you even name the French Prime Minister without refering to TFA ?

      And yet RMS is widely known even by his initials !

    4. Re:newsflash by abigsmurf · · Score: 1

      If you were to go to france and ask people on the street if they knew who RMS was, I'd be suprised if 5% of people could tell you. Ask to name the French Prime Minister, I'd bet you'd get 85%+.

    5. Re:newsflash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If he really wanted action to take place he'd organise a series of protests that can't just be turned away.

      Good God man! This is France we're talking about. French truck drivers will organize a massize strike that paralyzes the economy
      because water is wet. What is RMS going to do? Release a patch to EMACS that makes it run slower?

    6. Re:newsflash by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1
      And yet RMS is widely known even by his initials !

      widely - I do not think it means what you think it means. I conducted a quick office survey. Three people in the IT department of thirty knew who he was. And our major product runs on embedded Linux.

    7. Re:newsflash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's why people whitewashed Project GNU completely out of history, and call entire distributions "Linux". Turns out the way to starve a volunteer-based project is to make it invisible.

  20. Re:No appointment and he was pushed back? Horror! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Doesn't the French PM know who Richard Stallman is? Oh, he does...

  21. better yet by roman_mir · · Score: 1

    make the PM an offer he can't refuse, like blowing up the Eiffel Tower. The way RMS looks, I think they would have taken him more seriously then.

  22. Re:No appointment and he was pushed back? Horror! by DaPoulpe · · Score: 5, Informative

    Then the problem may be that he was denied an appointment in the first place don't you think ?
    For they are not just "someone" but 3 individuals quite involved into this DRM saga, thus having points and a petition to be discussed.
    Bill Gates is received with all the honors by the President and RMS & Co can't even reach the prime minister or even some random official guy ?

  23. Re:No appointment and he was pushed back? Horror! by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    It's a news story only because RMS was "pushed" back instead of tear gassed and beaten as many would expect with all the rioting going on over various government proposals. I guess irrationality is returnign to French politics now.

  24. Re:No appointment and he was pushed back? Horror! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    A letter was send 15 days before, and no one answered.

    When they get there, an official said "the decision of not meeting with RMS had been maturely considered".

  25. Confused... by Ajehals · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Im confused by this story. Firstly If someone turns up to see the Prime minister / President / Head Honcho of any country (or most organisations) without an invitation or appointment they are likely to be told "thanks, but no thanks". I don't really think that the "pushed away" part of this article, which appears to be the focus has any bearing on anything at all. (FTA: The delegation led by Richard Stallman was kindly but firmly pushed back by the chief of security team of French Prime minister saying : the decision not to receive Richard Stallman was mature considered .)

    The French government seem to be split on issues relating to open source (Software patents and DRM etc.) but do seem to be discussing it in public and with some authority, putting France somewhere at the top of the list of countries doing something about the issues at hand. We don't know which way it will swing, but at least we know it will be discussed first. Oh and congratulations to the 165,000 French People and 1000 Organisations who signed the EUCD.INFO petition, your doing something and this story should have focused on you, not on getting the most interesting headline.

    1. Re:Confused... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let me correct you on this: the French government doesn't give a damn about DRM, they want to please the industry. They don't want debate, they don't want to be convinced: they don't care. On the other hand, some people the parliament, who have a more direct relation with the citizens, are willing to discuss. And they try to do things properly. But the government doing its best to nullify their efforts.

      Please don't get mistaken into believing that France can show the way here. The reports you read about Apple and interoperability were shortsighted at best. We're just about to get the equivalent of the USA's DMCA, which is not a sign of progress.

    2. Re:Confused... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Vite, de la vaseline !

  26. Give Me A Break by TheFlyingGoat · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So their complaint is that the French PM's office wouldn't arrange a meeting with them, so they showed up at the door with a petition? And then they go on to try contrasting it with how the world's richest man (Gates) was received by the PM's office?

    Give me a freakin' break.

    Although Stallman has done a lot for free software, government officials probably don't know nor care who he is. I'm sure the French PM's schedule is CRAZY, and like any head of state they would NEVER allow a walk-in visitor. The behavior of the PM's office is predictable, and yet they decided to go anyway instead of finding some better method of getting their petition to the PM.

    Stallman should focus on actually trying to improve the state of things instead of weak publicity stunts like this. He's an attention whore, plain and simple.

    --
    You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life. --Winston Churchill
    1. Re:Give Me A Break by mrchaotica · · Score: 4, Insightful
      The behavior of the PM's office is predictable, and yet they decided to go anyway instead of finding some better method of getting their petition to the PM.

      How were they supposed to find some better method when the PM's office wouldn't even dignify their request with a response, pray tell? If the secretary had even made an attempt to arrange something that would be one thing, but being ignored completely is unacceptable.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    2. Re:Give Me A Break by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you ever considered that maybe neither the French PM nor any other Prime Minister or head of government figure anywhere in the world cares about Stallman, the FSF or anything else of this kind?

      Only because some angry nerds believe something to be important, it's not necessarily so.

    3. Re:Give Me A Break by Numen · · Score: 1

      Here's a test... take a petition to your head of state and come back and let us know how you got on.

      The Premieres office is not he place to deliver such a petition. The appropriate ministry is... in fact finding a house representitive should probably be your first step.

      Write up how it goes for you, and let us know.

    4. Re:Give Me A Break by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As point of fact Richard Nixon accepted a walk-in from Elvis Presley. And I believe that there are many other instances of such behaviour. The French invited Irish nobility into their city during their secret Flight of the Earls. These are just famous instances, and reading FOIA documents you'll see alot of instances of such things.

    5. Re:Give Me A Break by djmurdoch · · Score: 1

      I'm sure the French PM's schedule is CRAZY, and like any head of state they would NEVER allow a walk-in visitor.

      Pedantic point: The French President is the head of state. The PM is the head of government. In the US one person is the head of state and of government, but not in most other democracies.

    6. Re:Give Me A Break by dbIII · · Score: 1
      How were they supposed to find some better method when the PM's office wouldn't even dignify their request with a response, pray tell?
      Then you stop trying to go for the top of the tree and talk to someone that actually is responsible for that area of government - that's what Ministers are for instead of going for the Prime Minister. As for only waiting two weeks after writing the thing then turning up uninvited - do we really want the free software movement to appear like a childish tantrum?
    7. Re:Give Me A Break by melonman · · Score: 1

      Reality check: not everyone who writes to one of the ten or so most powerful political leaders in the world gets a hand-written response by return. If some French guy tried this trick at the Whitehouse, he'd probably be dead or under arrest by now.

      --
      Virtually serving coffee
    8. Re:Give Me A Break by bloblu · · Score: 1

      like any head of state

      Actually, our head of state is the President. (BTW, I don't know of any country in which the PM would be the head of state...)

    9. Re:Give Me A Break by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Elvis Presley didn't just walk into the white house, he wrote a letter offering to become some sort of represenative to the "drug culture", and Nixon set up a publicity event.

    10. Re:Give Me A Break by easter1916 · · Score: 1

      Sidebar; I sent an email to the French President a couple of years ago (just some small commentary on a position he had taken in some pan-European debate) and received a very formal, hand-written response from his office. Given that the comment didn't really warrant a response, I was very pleasantly surprised. Bear in mind that I'm neither a French citizen (I'm Irish), nor was I resident in France at the time (I'm in the USA).

    11. Re:Give Me A Break by westlake · · Score: 1
      How were they supposed to find some better method when the PM's office wouldn't even dignify their request with a response, pray tell? If the secretary had even made an attempt to arrange something that would be one thing, but being ignored completely is unacceptable.

      You come up with something better than the moth-eaten idea of a scroll of 100,000 names. This is political hack work, as easily ground out as the burgers at MacDonalds.

      You choose a local man or woman to make the presentation. Someone known and admired in the capital. You do not import RMS from the states, which is clear proof of political impotence at home.

      If the politicians still think it is safe to ignore you, they are very probably right.

    12. Re:Give Me A Break by marcosdumay · · Score: 1

      Maybe, in a perfect world, an governor should listen so someone representing more than a hundred thousand of their citizens...

      Now we know that this one isn't a perfect world, and more important, we can prove it.

  27. Must be a powerful hidden agenda at work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    You know something's fishy when people are oblivious to rms's charm.

    Seriously if he thought this was a good way to protest it wasn't. Near certain to backfire and potentially even dangerous.

  28. Now go away... by Billosaur · · Score: 4, Funny

    On Friday 9th of June 2006 at 3.30pm, Richard Stallman led a delegation composed by Frédéric Couchet (Free Software Foundation France) and Christophe Espern (EUCD.INFO initiative) to meet the French Prime minister in order to talk about the French DRM law proposal. Richard Stallman and his friends were pushed back by the chief of security team.

    ...or we will taunt you a second time!

    --
    GetOuttaMySpace - The Anti-Social Network
  29. Re:No appointment and he was pushed back? Horror! by InsaneGeek · · Score: 1

    Maybe his history of antics have worked against him and now is listed under the "cooks" category.

  30. Wow, you sure showed him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Funny , thats just what happened to me before I even got close to the end of this lame excuse for "humour" which the poster has obviously been saving for a rainy day to cut and paste. Sad.

    ...because certainly the point of the original post wasn't made to evoke a response or anything...

    1. Re:Wow, you sure showed him by Viol8 · · Score: 1

      Lot of effort just for people to think him a wanker.

    2. Re:Wow, you sure showed him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but it worked, didn't it?

  31. Re:No appointment and he was pushed back? Horror! by cptgrudge · · Score: 1

    How does this get moderated Troll? It is common sense. If I walked up to the Governor in my state without an appointment and started trying to convince him to use (GNU)Linux on every state computer, I assume that I'd get stopped too. Does the submitter think that RMS should be getting special treatment?

    --
    Qualitas edurus commercium, nullus penitus net rimor, nullus deus beneficium
  32. The Oder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Even the French have standards about bathing, even as low as they are; I'd force him out too if I had to smell him. Perhaps RMS should take a shower for once, before he tries this again?

  33. Arg! I am embarrassed by my countrymen. by bigattichouse · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I am an American, and I have to say to mr. Stallman:

    Please wear a suit when trying to meet with foreign dignitaries.

    And at least wear your hair back and trim your beard a little. You look like a hippy slob, and that was how you were received.

    You do free software a disservice by appearing like don't you give a crap. You expect them to take you seriously looking like you don't take them seriously?

    --
    meh
    1. Re:Arg! I am embarrassed by my countrymen. by rjdegraaf · · Score: 0, Troll
      I am an American, and I have to say to mr. Stallman:

      Please wear a suit when trying to meet with foreign dignitaries.

      And at least wear your hair back and trim your beard a little. You look like a hippy slob, and that was how you were received.

      ...


      Said by a guy from the home of the free. As free as he tells you how to act.
    2. Re:Arg! I am embarrassed by my countrymen. by GalionTheElf · · Score: 1

      Stallman is as free to look like a slob as the French PM is to tell him to get lost. It works both ways ya know.

      --
      I'm going over here and I don't know why!
    3. Re:Arg! I am embarrassed by my countrymen. by metlin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Said by a guy from the home of the free. As free as he tells you how to act.

      Heh, what's wrong with you? You're forgetting a very fundamental thing:

      Freedom does not mean lack of responsibility.

      Freedom comes at a price - and sometimes, that price is you having to do things that will get you noticed.

      If you really value freedom more than simply making a statement, you would do whatever it takes to make sure that your call for freedom gets noticed. If you value your dress-code more than what you represent, you don't really believe in what you represent all that much.

      This has nothing to do with freedom, it has everything to do with following a protocol to do something, or get something done.

      You, my friend, have a very, very screwed up sense of what freedom means. RMS is free to do anything he wants, but he just won't get noticed. That's a very fine line.

    4. Re:Arg! I am embarrassed by my countrymen. by NewmanBlur · · Score: 1

      It could have been worse...

      --
      Per ardua ad astra.
    5. Re:Arg! I am embarrassed by my countrymen. by darthCodex · · Score: 1

      I am not an American, I'm Dutch... and I totally agree with you.

      To be honest I don't give a crap about whether my government uses free software, open source software or closed source evil boohaha propietary Microsoft software but I do agree with you that if you're going to make a statement and want someone to hear you, you should at least attempt to conform to the cultural and professional standards that the party you're trying to convince adheres to.

      This guy looks plain rediculous.

      --
      Supplies!
    6. Re:Arg! I am embarrassed by my countrymen. by elpapacito · · Score: 1

      YOU probably look like an hippy slob, troll.

    7. Re:Arg! I am embarrassed by my countrymen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you honestly think that the results would have been any different if he shaved off his mane and wore an Armani?

    8. Re:Arg! I am embarrassed by my countrymen. by ajrs · · Score: 1

      When you start paying mr. Stallman a salery, be sure to bring up the dress code.

    9. Re:Arg! I am embarrassed by my countrymen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a good chance they could've been.

    10. Re:Arg! I am embarrassed by my countrymen. by doshell · · Score: 1

      I think it's about time our civilization grew enough intelligence to judge people by their ideas and not by their looks. It's not like the man has a contagious disease of some sort; in what way does his beard or the clothes he wears affect your ability to have a civilized conversation with him?

      We as a society learned to attribute way too much importance to aesthetics. Anyone who isn't hopelessly dumb acknowledges that wearing a suit doesn't intrinsically make someone a more competent individual, but most of us still let the way someone pleases (or disgusts) our eye affect our judgement of that person.

      What really matters is not looking like crap on the inside.

      --
      Score: i, Imaginary
    11. Re:Arg! I am embarrassed by my countrymen. by MythMoth · · Score: 1

      [i]What really matters is not looking like crap on the inside.[/i]

      This is true. So what?

      Given a choice between dressing up nicely and achieving something, and standing on your principles and achieving nothing, please feel free to go ahead and achieve nothing. But don't expect anyone to be surprised. Or interested.

      --
      --- These are not words: wierd, genious, rediculous
    12. Re:Arg! I am embarrassed by my countrymen. by doshell · · Score: 1
      Given a choice between dressing up nicely and achieving something, and standing on your principles and achieving nothing, please feel free to go ahead and achieve nothing. But don't expect anyone to be surprised. Or interested.

      I was criticising the very need for this choice -- that was my whole point. In a perfect world, Stallman's ideas would be the sole cause of (un)interest or surprisal. I do realise that in the real world tradeoffs have to take place (and Stallman should indeed make an effort if he wants to succeed), but that's no excuse to bury one's head in the sand and avoid pointing out what's wrong with our culture.

      In other words, if given the choice I would choose the world in which people aren't despised by their not-so-nice looks. Most people I've discussed this with wouldn't because they think of looks+value as the whole package, and that they're getting less when the looks stay aside. To me that's wrong.

      --
      Score: i, Imaginary
    13. Re:Arg! I am embarrassed by my countrymen. by rjdegraaf · · Score: 1
      YOU probably look like an hippy slob, troll.
      Might be and I don't care what you think of my appearance.

      As long as I respect people for what they say and not how they look, I am ok :)

  34. No suprise... by TheCabal · · Score: 1

    Why does anyone continue to give Stallman any credibility? A publicit stunt for sure, but in the end could very well reflect negatively on the community as a whole.

    1. Re:No suprise... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Why does anyone continue to give Stallman any credibility? A publicit stunt for sure, but in the end could very well reflect negatively on the community as a whole.

      What community? There is no community, there is only Richard Stallman. YOU get to ride on HIS coat-tails, not the other way around.
    2. Re:No suprise... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Why does anyone continue to give Stallman any credibility?

      Well, let's see:

      Rather than pissing and moaning about something he didn't like or agree with, he went and actually did something about it (how many operating systems have you written lately?).

      He has continued to do so for over 30 years (remember kids - the initial announcement for the start of the GNU project was in 1983).

      He doesn't compromise - even when it would make life easier on himself.

      I'm not saying that I agree with everything he does or says - but at least he is consistent.

  35. Re:No appointment and he was pushed back? Horror! by RingDev · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Not only that, but if you are going to attempt to barge in for an unscheduled appointment, at least dress appropriately! I mean, you're going to meet the Prime Minister, don't you think a tie is in order? Or at least a step up from khakis and a polo shirt? These guys look more like college kids than the heads of political organizations. I wouldn't take them seriously either.

    -Rick

    --
    "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
  36. a 2 bit shave and a hair cut by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    RMS might do better if her were to dress and groom better. The hippy programmer thing just doesn't fly with most politicians. Aside from not having an appointment he just looked like a slob that no politician, expecially a French one, would ever want to be photographed with. If he had groomed he might have gotten someone to LOOK at his petition rather than just get turned away.
    I'll bet that Gates didn't go to see the French president wearing his normal ugly blue shirt that looks like he's been wearing it for the past week and a half. I still wouldn't want to be photographed with him, though.

  37. That's a long petition by 91degrees · · Score: 1

    Perhaps RMS should get an electronic copy. I guess he's just not all that technologically literate though.

  38. Re:No appointment and he was pushed back? Horror! by bigattichouse · · Score: 1

    As a sign language interpreter in Jueneau, AK I once met the governor (Tony Knowles), and he gave us (two teachers, me, and the deaf child) a personal tour of the governors office. Alaska is such a cool place.

    --
    meh
  39. You may not agree... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You may not agree with Stallman's tactics, but the message this sends is clear: The people passing today's draconian intellectual property laws they are NOT representing the general public -- they are representing coporate interests.

    Bill Gates is a citizen of the US, just like Stallman. Gates and Stallman take opposing viewpoints on the particular issue, and both are well known and intelligent individuals with strong arguments. However, only Gates was allowed to talk to the PM.

    Stallman tried to get an audience with the PM, but was refused. It was only after the refusal that he tried to just "barge in", and there is *nothing wrong with this*. This kind of thing has happened throughout history -- a corrupt goverment has favored a certain group of people, and the unfavored group resorts to any tactics necessary to get themesleves heard.

    Those of you who are criticizing Stallman, saying thing like "duh, I could have told you this would fail"... You're totally missing the point. Stallman also knew it would fail. Why else would he have a cameraman on hand ready to document the event. He's making a point, and it seems like a lot of people are missing it.

    In a very real sense, Stallman represents the little guy, and Gates represents the corporate interests. In a very real sense, the goverments are NOT listening to the people. When the governments are only hearing one side of the story on DRM/copyright, it should be obvious that the laws are going to be heavily biased. And *this* is what is bad. Nobody from the opposite end of the spectrum is being listened to, and we are LOSING OUR RIGHTS.

    Stallman is out there putting his ass on the line to show people this, and hopefully reach a larger audience than the few geeks on Slashdot who already know how bad everything has gotten. Before you get too critical of his methods, ask yourself what *you* have done to help turn the tide. Because sitting on your ass complaining about the shutdown of The Pirate Bay isn't accomplishing a damn thing.

    1. Re:You may not agree... by tomcres · · Score: 1
      When the governments are only hearing one side of the story on DRM/copyright, it should be obvious that the laws are going to be heavily biased. And *this* is what is bad. Nobody from the opposite end of the spectrum is being listened to, and we are LOSING OUR RIGHTS.

      [rolleyes] Rights? Who are you, John Locke? Do you really think there is an inalienable, God-given right to do whatever you please with someone else's property? The fact is, that recordings are owned by the copyright holder. It is up to them to decide what rights they want to confer upon you to make use of them. If they choose to release these recordings in DRM-only format, then how is that infringing upon your rights? A copyright holder has the right to choose whether or not to release their property in a DRM or free format. You also have the right to choose whether or not to buy such goods. You can complain all you want if the producers of the recordings don't release them in the format you prefer, but ultimately, it is their right to decide what to do with their property, not you. If they were forcing you to protect your own work with DRM, you'd have an argument.

    2. Re:You may not agree... by Chrononium · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I disagree. I think this is a simple case of a man who decided to disregard the fact that he was turned down an audience with the prime minister. The head of state. The guy with a million-plus things to do. The result is obvious. Nothing at all was demonstrated except this man's simple ignorance.

      Assume for a moment that RMS decided to visit StateA to talk with its PM. As a citizen of StateA, I want the government and its officials to be doing things for me. That's why I elect them. If a guy comes to the PM's door asking for an audience with the PM, I would expect the PM to only grant an audience if this man gave a good argument for how StateA could benefit from said audience. Nothing wrong with that, since the PM is supposed to serve the country! Does this discriminate against the little guy? Absolutely! How can the PM know if that little guy is some nutjob claiming support from millions of StateA's citizens? If StateA is a republic, then maybe convincing one of the theoretically less busy representatives that your cause is worth spending public money would be a better, more appropriate route. The PM is not there to answer every idiot's questions and that has nothing to do with Gates or RMS: it just isn't his job. G

      Gates represents something unique, as do all large company leaders: they command large sections of the economy. They really do represent something potentially good for StateA (notice the word 'potentially'). Makes sense why Gates easily obtains an audience while RMS doesn't: RMS failed to provide an argument for why France would benefit (and hence, why the citizens of France should pay the PM to talk with RMS).

      There is no conspiracy required between the big companies and the government to make sense of this case. It's just how the government is supposed to work (at least in a republic, and note that I said republic and democracy).

    3. Re:You may not agree... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is only one HUGE hole in your arguement. You consider they have the right to do what they please with their content and I tend to agree. However, DRM does NOT just protect their content. DRM, Broadcast flags, etc, etc which will be built into the newer PCs, TVs, Set-top boxes etc will all cost more to manufacture and those costs will be directly sent down to the consumers even if you don't buy their content! Why can they force me to pay MORE for a product even though I do NOT want to watch/listento their content?

      Why is their a "tax" on blank media like cd's.....you're assumed to be a crook.....so I have to pay extra to backup my data.

    4. Re:You may not agree... by rabun_bike · · Score: 1

      Excellent point. I think you are right on. Stallman is not naive to public policy and politics whether local or international. In fact his own concept of how software should be 'free' as Stallman defines it is rooted not in technology but personal belief, philosophy, and politics. Philosophy is enacted or protected by policy (e.g. govt. passing or failing to pass various laws of enforcement.) This effort and the documentation of the effort via a camera to speak with the Prime Minister might seem totally crazy unless you view it as a stunt to promote FSF ideas and bring awareness to the cause. Clearly the message is getting out and Stallman's tactics are working. The roll of paper is also clearly a stunt to demonstrate the magnitude of the side he represents. The scroll works well with the camera by capturing the magnitude of the message. Stallman is a smart cookie. He has an agenda and strong political views whether you agree with them or not.

    5. Re:You may not agree... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stallman is out there putting his ass on the line...

      Huh? I guess "possibly losing your lifelong grant money and being forced to get a real job" might look a lot like "putting your ass on the line" to some. To others, he seems like a radical kook who will never be taken seriously by the people he wishes to influence.

      Guess what RMS - to some you are not at all important. Here is a great example of that. Many people see you as a loony and that will not help you further your cause in certain areas - one of those areas is politics.

    6. Re:You may not agree... by dbIII · · Score: 1
      You may not agree with Stallman's tactics, but the message this sends is clear
      The clear message is that RMS is in the news again - everything else has been wasted in a silly stunt. What would be the opinion of all of those signatories who's names ended up literally in the gutter as part of a little bit of RMS self promotion to the free software community which will remain completely un-noticed by anyone else because he couldn't even organise a meeting with the relevant government minister and had to try to shake the top of a tree instead knowing full well that he would not be allowed in?

      Consider that if members of the free software community are dismissive of this stunt what do you think the opinion of other is? This doesn't help anyone other than RMS - his arse isn't on the line, it's just him pulling his pants down and waving it in people's faces to get a strong revolted reaction from the few people who are already paying attention.

    7. Re:You may not agree... by hackus · · Score: 4, Interesting

      A couple of Points:

      Your quite right Stallman knew this was going to fail. But the real issue is something you neglected to point out is, that DRM is not about copying songs and video.

      This is a much bigger issue than that.

      It has to do with education, who gets knowledge, who can pay for knowledge and those that can't are screwed.

      This goes for anything science or technology related.

      Throughout history corrupt regimes and governments have known all too well that citizens that can read or write, or are empowered to discover or reorganize information without dogma are "disruptive" to the state as a whole.

      Whether you like it or not, Universities, school systems etc are not setup by what one accomplishes or contributes. They are setup for those who want to play "the game" so to speak. Don't play the "game" and your out. This is painfully obvious if you are in a computer science department and are doing research. If someone doesn't like your ideas, your out.

      See it happen to my prof personally and the process is disgusting because it ties everything to money and corporate contributors and very little of it has to do with any real science.

      What Stallman is really advocating is that information and technology should be available for all, free for all and there should be no barriers constructed artifically or legislated by governments.

      Since most of his arguments revolve around software this makes sense because software is what directs computers to share or not share information. As the world becomes fully networked, obviously there is going to be a huge divide if something isn't done about it soon.

      The little guy here as you should point out is every Slashdot reader.

      I also believe you made a interesting point about governments listening. If it hasn't hit everyone in the head by now, governments ARE listening quite well to thier citizens. But these citizens are not individuals, they are corporations.

      I do not even believe governments such as those in the US for example even listen to citizens as defined as "voter" anymore.

      Which brings me to a rather not so nice future painting. The entire globe is one huge computer network. If you don't work for a corporation, you can't learn. Can't learn, can't get a job. Can't get a job, your even lower than the guy working for the corporation so you get substandard or next to no healthcare, your kids can't go to college because it is too expensive. (i.e. every public university will be corporate owned in about 20-30 years anyway at the rate its going. Form a buget perspective anyway.) Furthermore, if you are caught making copies of information say about "Calculas" or "American History" DRM books you can instantly be imprisoned for hard labor with no trial.

      Sounds absolutely rediculous if it wasn't for the fact that it has already happened.

      -Hack

      --
      Got Geometrodynamics? Awe, too hard to figure out? Too bad.
    8. Re:You may not agree... by professionalfurryele · · Score: 1

      Erm, no, you miss the point. Copyrights should not be thought of as property rights. They are rights conferred in order to encourage the production of the useful arts and sciences. Now what rights the copyright holders have should all be justified solely on the basis of if they promote the useful arts and sciences or not. DRM does not promote the useful arts and sciences because it enables people to release recordings that can, in principle never enter the public domain. Ergo DRM runs counter to the reason we have copyright.
      Do I think that I have an inalienable right to do whatever I want with public domain works? Yes, and I think the Founding Fathers might agree with me on this one. I have a right to access the cultural heritage of the country I live in, and of humanity. If you don't agree with that, then fine, but don't dress your objection in the language of property. Come right out and say:

      "Hey peasant, you do what your feudal lord tells you, till that field, and don't you even dare think about experiencing the cultural heritage of this nation."

    9. Re:You may not agree... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hes talking about in general you fucking retard not just copyright laws.

    10. Re:You may not agree... by Corbets · · Score: 3, Insightful

      He's making a point, and it seems like a lot of people are missing it.

      Then he didn't make the point very well, did he?

    11. Re:You may not agree... by Daedala · · Score: 1

      Um. I think the point just proven is that Stallman will be turned away from an audience with a PM if he deliberately provokes it. Which is why he had the cameraman on hand.

      --
      What I say does not represent the views of my employers, my friends, my cats, or myself.
    12. Re:You may not agree... by Proteus · · Score: 1

      "Annoying man denied unscheduled audience with PM: film at 11"

      Seriously, this is a publicity stunt. Not that it's an invalid tactic, but there is no "deep message" here -- except that RMS wants to make his point badly enough to stage a stunt.

      --
      We may not imagine how our lives could be more frustrating and complex—but Congress can. – Cullen Hightower
    13. Re:You may not agree... by Lauwenmark · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You may not agree with Stallman's tactics, but the message this sends is clear: The people passing today's draconian intellectual property laws they are NOT representing the general public -- they are representing coporate interests.
      Except that now, the French Prime Minister will have a much easier time to dismiss Stallman in the eyes of the public. "See, that guy dressed like a hippie tried to short-circuit the procedure, as if this country was his own property". If that was intentional from Stallman, then I'd say it is a very bad attempt that shows little understanding of the French political customs.

      Bill Gates is a citizen of the US, just like Stallman. Gates and Stallman take opposing viewpoints on the particular issue, and both are well known and intelligent individuals with strong arguments. However, only Gates was allowed to talk to the PM.
      Because Gates prepared his meeting months in advance, and was clever enough to use skilled representatives that had an in-depth knowledge on how things work in France to prepare the meeting. Do you really think that he just passed by, waved his hand and was magically given entrance ? Of course not.

      Stallman tried to get an audience with the PM, but was refused.
      Yes - yet we don't know exactly how the demand was formulated, so it is hard to draw any conclusion about this point.

      It was only after the refusal that he tried to just "barge in", and there is *nothing wrong with this*.
      Of course, there is. You may not like the decisions taken by the French government, but that's still the emanation of an organized, democratic system, in which there are rather strict rules telling you how to act in each case.

      Sure, it was his right to try to force entrance - but so was it the right of the PM to refuse it. There is nothing wrong on either side, as the security guard reacted the normal way to the coming of something that isn't on the "guests list".

      This kind of thing has happened throughout history -- a corrupt goverment has favored a certain group of people, and the unfavored group resorts to any tactics necessary to get themesleves heard.
      Let's be clear on this - the event isn't about an opposition between the philosophies of RMS and corporations. It basically describes somebody attempting to see the Prime Minister of France without invitation. What has this to do with corruption and tactics ? Do you really think this would be any different in another country ?

      Those of you who are criticizing Stallman, saying thing like "duh, I could have told you this would fail"... You're totally missing the point. Stallman also knew it would fail. Why else would he have a cameraman on hand ready to document the event. He's making a point, and it seems like a lot of people are missing it.
      I don't miss it - it was for him a good way of showing how evil the French PM is. Yet this is not going to earn him a lot of support in Europe: blatantly ignoring the local customs and rules will not make you welcome for sure. A lot of French people already see the US as overly intrusive - and now, they'll see images of an US citizen behaving as if he was in conquerred territory. *We* know that it isn't the case, but *they* would read the event quite differently.

      In a very real sense, Stallman represents the little guy, and Gates represents the corporate interests.
      Again, that's not the point here. Gates followed the local rules, while RMS didn't.

      In a very real sense, the goverments are NOT listening to the people. When the governments are only hearing one side of the story on DRM/copyright, it should be obvious that the laws are going to be heavily biased.
      You know what ? French people interested by the debate already know, for the most part, that the government is heavily biased. The rest of the citizens really don't care at all. So what did this action change ? Nothing. Zero. Nada. It actually only strengthened the DRM/copyright side by offerin

    14. Re:You may not agree... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Information and art cannot be considered property. Any society that considers either of those as property, is flawed.

    15. Re:You may not agree... by killjoe · · Score: 1

      To be fair you are talking about slashdot. Slashdots hates RMS. I don't mean dislike I mean hate with a passion.

      Yes I know slashdot is not a person but that's the view of the majority of /. users.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    16. Re:You may not agree... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd say the comments on this make me very sad. I expect to see effete, authority-loving Europeans sniff at how uncivilized Stallman's display was, but Americans? What the hell is wrong with my countrymen? I get the feeling that if the Boston Tea Party incident were to occur today, a lot of people would be sneering about how improper it was, how they should have worn suits and ties, how they can't possibly expect His Majesty to dignify such vulgarity with a response, and anyway, they're only making their cause look unprofessional! If they had a complaint, they should have quietly submitted a letter of grievance without "making a scene," so that the government could take every step necessary to file it away and forget about it.

        Stallman tried to go through proper channels, and was denied even the basic courtesy of a simple "No, thanks" response. I guess people here would prefer if Stallman just said "Oh, well," packed it in and gave up? Being courteous in that case is just the thing to make sure that your side is never heard at all. OTOH, being heard may mean being rude and using a "publicity stunt" to draw attention (you know, PUBLICITY) to yourself.

        Next thing you know, Americans will be stopping their cars at red lights and waiting the Whole.. Time.. Until.. It.. Turns.. Green, even if there's no other cars or cops around for miles -- just like most Europeans seem to do -- because "it's the law, and you're supposed to follow it!"

    17. Re:You may not agree... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are right. Outside of /. nobody knows what RMS is to begin with.

  40. Poor PM... by DMiax · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... having RMS after you mustn't be a nice experience! He is the real victim of this. :P

  41. And here I was thinking by markov_chain · · Score: 3, Funny

    the story was about a poorly designed French Power Module not working with alternating current

    --
    Tsunami -- You can't bring a good wave down!
  42. Re:No appointment and he was pushed back? Horror! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So basically the guy with lots of money gets a meeting, but the guy who represents 165,000 people does not?

    What a remarkably clear-cut demonstration that democracy is dead and plutocracy has taken its place.

  43. Re:No appointment and he was pushed back? Horror! by metlin · · Score: 1

    It's called using the right channels.

    You don't simply walk up and demand an audience.

    You write to the necessary folks, follow the protocol and you'd probably be assigned a time if they felt that the time was worth it, and if it would have some benefit.

  44. The best compiler around by mr_bk · · Score: 1

    I use things originally written by Mr. Stallman about every day---notably gcc and gdb. It takes a special kind of brilliance to write a debugger---one that I certainly will never have---and I admire him for doing such great and valuable work.

    His comparative advantage, and his most successful means of bringing people to the Free Software movement, is in writing good code. Too bad he doesn't do that anymore.

    1. Re:The best compiler around by julesh · · Score: 1

      It takes a special kind of brilliance to write a debugger---one that I certainly will never have---and I admire him for doing such great and valuable work.

      I'm not sure I follow you. In what way is a debugger harder than (say) a compiler?

  45. Pity France. Rational thought is useless. by meburke · · Score: 0, Troll

    This stunt was bound to fail on a diplomatic level, and probably succeeded in it it's real purpose: RMS self-agrandizement.

    France is a culture of peasants. The government is Paternalistic to the extreme. The citizenry accepts that the government will regulate their lives, and attempts at direct independence are futile. This is why France is the laughingstock of Europe, and that is why the French are so grouchy. Pity them and ignore them. Economics will make believers out of them in time.

    Mike

    --
    "The mind works quicker than you think!"
    1. Re:Pity France. Rational thought is useless. by jcr · · Score: 1

      succeeded in it it's real purpose: RMS self-agrandizement.

      Heh.. Richard probably thinks so.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    2. Re:Pity France. Rational thought is useless. by Epeeist · · Score: 1

      Have you actually been there? Are you aware of Diderot and Voltaire? Are you aware of the protests against the government that have been going on recently?

    3. Re:Pity France. Rational thought is useless. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Think about the French Revolution, about Lafayette and about P. Paoli who inspired the basis of the American constitution. My 2 cents ;)

    4. Re:Pity France. Rational thought is useless. by DMiax · · Score: 1
      France is a culture of peasants. The government is Paternalistic to the extreme. The citizenry accepts that the government will regulate their lives, and attempts at direct independence are futile. This is why France is the laughingstock of Europe, and that is why the French are so grouchy. Pity them and ignore them.

      Everyone can think anything she/he wants about other people. Some also say it, this is the problem.

    5. Re:Pity France. Rational thought is useless. by meburke · · Score: 1

      Not recently, and I doubt "going there" would make me anymore informed than researching from here does.

      As for the protests: As I said, Economics will eventually turn them into believers. However, protesting is an age-old pastime in France and does not really constitute political action or change.

      Diderot and Voltaire are not contemporary thinkers and never wrote about DRM. I made a generalization about France and the French, and a few exceptions does not disprove the merit of the generalization. This was, however, a personal opinion based on long experience with the French, going back to the Vietnam War.

      This is a French problem, a fairly minor problem compared to other problems France has, and RMS has no standing and no business trying to influence French politics. (It's not as if they were collecting Jews for Nazi concentration camps!) If he could assemble a coherent, rational argument (as opposed to rants and raves), he might be able to rationally present it and be listened to. A petition is nothing more than a "squeaky wheel" and crowd behavior is usually bereft of rational thought. A few well-placed articles ridiculing French lawmakers by name, supported by good argument, and bolstered by the agreement of a few admired French thinkers (if that's not an oxymoron...) would do more to influence them than any fat, underdressed slob outsider showing up at the palace.

      --
      "The mind works quicker than you think!"
    6. Re:Pity France. Rational thought is useless. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      America is a culture of brutal barbarians. The government is aggressive to the extreme. The citizenry accepts that the government will commit genocide, and attempts at peace are futile. This is why the USA is the laughing stock of the world, and that is why Americans are such morons. Pity them and ignore them. The backlash in terrorism will make them believers in time.

      About just as true as your statement.

    7. Re:Pity France. Rational thought is useless. by pdoucy · · Score: 1

      Those are two very different things :

      First, the fact that any hippy cannot come to a prime minister to tell him what to do is not correlated in any manner to the french presumably being peasants, or to the french at all. Would George Bush receive him ? I hope not.

      Second, when you say that people generally accept to be told what to do by their governments, it is like saying that americans are - without exception - against abortion, and that all of them go to see prisonners executions just as the french go to the movies. You have a brain ? Use it.

      That said, I don't like the "don't you forget Diderot and Voltaire were french" argument either. Those guys are dead. We remember them, but they don't really inspire us any more, and the fact that they were pretty smart does not excuse our present mistakes.

      As for the "recent protests against the governement", I'm affraid that pretty much fuels the parent's argument. Those protests were actually against bringing a little flexibility to labours laws, and were essentially lead by civil servants not willing to giving up their unfait advantages, and by completely unambitious students who think it is normal to be given a job for life when you have studied "sociology and philosophy of the ancient tribes of sweden in the second century B.C.".

      Just my two cents. You might just ignore me anyway, as I'm french.

      --
      Cats are intended to teach us that not everything in nature has a function.
    8. Re:Pity France. Rational thought is useless. by DMiax · · Score: 1

      "a few exceptions does not disprove the merit of the generalization."

      Really, exceptions disprove the rule, contrary to everything you seem to think.

    9. Re:Pity France. Rational thought is useless. by meburke · · Score: 1

      It is like this: I like visiting certain parts of France, but I would not want to raise my family there. I have met French citizens I like, and most of them were women. I got along well with some French citizens who shared common interests such as skydiving, sailing, skiing, and mountaineering, but usually not in France. (French ski resorts, which were so charming and hospitable in the 60's, were the pits in the 80's.) Provence was nice, (no pun intended) but it's hard to get really good service on the Riviera these days.

      So, regarding this topic, despite my low regard for French politics and culture, I have no reason to think that my opinions on the DRM would suit the French better than their own. RMS should leave French problems for the French to solve in the French way.

      --
      "The mind works quicker than you think!"
  46. 165,000 signatures??? by ivoras · · Score: 2, Informative
    According to Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/France), France has a population of over 63 milion people! 165 thousand is probably the size of average village over there. It's nothing.

    Since there were so little signatures, this could mean three things: a) there's and evil scheme to supress free speech and petition signing, b) people are not well educated on the subject or c) people simply don't agree with the petition. Choose one.

    --
    -- Sig down
    1. Re:165,000 signatures??? by mrchaotica · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Maybe France is different, but here in the US there's a huge discrepancy between the number of people who hold an opinion and the number of people willing to take the effort to express it (by signing a petition, voting, or whatever). I would say 165,000 signatures is a lot even here, let alone in France.

      Not to mention the difficulty in advertizing the thing in the first place, and the logistics of getting the document and the signer in the same place.... it's likely that most of those 63 million people never even had the oppertunity to sign it, because they never heard about it.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    2. Re:165,000 signatures??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I choose b. People in France barely knows nothing about DRM. The majority loads their MP3 player with songs ripped from their audio CDs, or from files downloaded from Internet. They don't care about legality, partly because they don't realize it may be illegal (copying songs/videos on tapes in the past wasn't such a big deal, why would it be now ?), and partly because law isn't currently clear enough about this subject. IMHO, this explains why there were so little signatures. Note that I'm french, and I signed the petition, because I'm self-educated on this subject.

      Trying to clarify the law is a good idea, but the way the government wants to clarify it is awful. First because it's a "liberty-killing" law (all accepted liberties for now will vanish, morphing a lot of people to bandits), and because this law introduces a lot of unclear points as clarification (!). For example (and it's one example, there are numerous others), P2P becomes illegal, except for legal uses, but nothing precises who/what decides the legality of the use... That sort of points added with the fact the current government succeeds very well in not listening citizens (but excels in listening majors like Vivendi Universal) makes this project really difficult to accept.

      However if you don't understand the subject and/or the media doesn't talk about it, you don't care... Petrol prices trouble a lot more people.

    3. Re:165,000 signatures??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't the rule of thumb that for every person who complains, there are 9 others that feel the same but have said nothing.

      So that makes is ~3% of the population. That's enough to swing votes a LONG way.

    4. Re:165,000 signatures??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, the French do seem careless about minorities. Specificly, The Jehovah's Witnesses in France are not given the tax exemption status that all other non-profit and religious organizations in France get. And yet no one would doubt that Jehovah's Witnesses in France do more Christian Evangelizing type of community work than any other religion in France.

    5. Re:165,000 signatures??? by ray-auch · · Score: 1

      This is France we're talking about - protest (and/or strikes) is a national pastime.

      100k people (nationally) actually caring enough to hit the streets is common.

      100k on the streets of Paris alone, plus a lot more nationwide is a big issue (but not uncommon, and probably still doesn't get you an audience with the PM).

      100k names on a piece of paper, for the entire nation, (and delivered by an american at that) is very likely in "nobody cares" territory.

  47. Look at the photos by T.Hobbes · · Score: 4, Interesting

    here. Stallman spoke to the security guards on the street outside the office, was denied entry, then unrolled the (very long) petition of concerned citizens in the gutter as a symbolic gesture. He didn't rant and rave and try and push his way into some gilded office.

    1. Re:Look at the photos by killjoe · · Score: 1

      Please don't interject actual facts into this conversation. RMS was mentioned in the summary so this is a great opportunity for /. users to express their hatred of the man by telling the world how he is a madman who does not take showers.

      --
      evil is as evil does
  48. Re:No appointment and he was pushed back? Horror! by Ithika · · Score: 1

    now is listed under the "cooks" category.

    The French have a great reputation as food lovers, and should be only too happy to receive a foreign cook who is interested in their cuisine.

  49. Re:No appointment and he was pushed back? Horror! by jcr · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Then the problem may be that he was denied an appointment in the first place don't you think ?

    Umm... No. I fully support anyone who chooses not to meet with RMS, for whatever reason they choose.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  50. Re:No appointment and he was pushed back? Horror! by DaPoulpe · · Score: 0

    I would have to agree if he just walked there as such.

    But as somebody already pointed out they'd written to the French minister's office 15 days beforehand that they didn't even bother to answer to.
    When they showed there, they got told by an official that "the decision of not meeting with RMS had been maturely considered".

    Right channels issue ? Don't think so..

  51. Re:No appointment and he was pushed back? Horror! by mrchaotica · · Score: 1
    You write to the necessary folks...

    You must have missed the part in the article where they said they did write to the necessary folks, and got ignored.

    --

    "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  52. You've GOT to be kidding me... by nettdata · · Score: 1

    Hell... I wouldn't let him in to see ME, even if I knew who he was!

    Now, don't get me wrong, I'm all for the "relaxed" dress code and all, but if I'm meeting a new client, I'll sure as hell put on the monkey suit and try and look respectable.

    NEVER MIND if I were to try and see a world leader, without an appointment.

    Did he seriously expect to actually meet the guy?

    For real?

    I think someone's losing touch with reality a bit...

    --



    $0.02 (CDN)
    1. Re:You've GOT to be kidding me... by dbIII · · Score: 1
      Hell... I wouldn't let him in to see ME, even if I knew who he was!
      I would agree to meet him - but since he wouldn't get in the building without signing his name and wearing a badge that would stop him dead. Remember it's not just the RFID ones he hates - the paper ones with pen written on them were the target of an earlier stunt.

      He's not losing touch with reality - it was a deliberate stunt to waste the petition on a bit of RMS promotion.

    2. Re:You've GOT to be kidding me... by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1

      Don't you recognize a publicity stunt when you see one?

      As it is, I would not see RMS either. He is nothing more than a crank.

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
  53. Re:No appointment and he was pushed back? Horror! by deadhammer · · Score: 1

    And as we all know, the French certainly hate their cooks. What with their pans and ovens and ingredients! The nerve!

    --
    I'll be honest, we're throwing science against the wall to see what sticks. -Cave Johnson
  54. parfume by drwho · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'd say it was because of RMS' bodily odor, but then I remembered that this was France we're talking about.

  55. Re:He Was Not Invited, And Wanted An Audience... by Sumadartson · · Score: 1

    Wow. Does this man know anything about the real world? Has he ever been to Europe? To France? Out of his bedroom? He could have at least worn a suit.

    I love how this gives free software such a professional image. Really, this is a giant step forward.

    What a stupid... hippie.

  56. Looks like RMS is hiding something... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a basketball under his shirt :P

  57. Don't feel Bad for Richard... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    his trip to france was obviously tax deductible.

  58. Who said RMS had common sense? by winkydink · · Score: 1

    Is this really a news story? Someone without an appointment tries to seek a personal audience with a world leader and is denied? That's not anti-DRM, it's just common sense.

    Zealotry and common sense are not mutually exclusive, though they often do not seem to coexist.

    --

    "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    1. Re:Who said RMS had common sense? by susano_otter · · Score: 1

      Working for the people is serious business. The office should damn well get some respect.

      Otherwise, what message are you sending? "We citizens don't take the office seriously."

      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

  59. This was a maturely decided political decision.. by jeremie_z_ · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ... not to receive RMS.. and not a question of planning, or appointment of whatever... Matignon was warned for a few weeks of his coming, and could have make him be received by any small office-counselor, as humiliating as it would have been, some "chargé de mission" or whatever. but instead decided to leave him 100m away from the place. That's exacly how was treated the free software position about DRM, internet-filtering dispositions, articles forcing DRM into any software, and so many other atrocities commited into the DADVSI law in the name of "protecting the authors". ... well the authors of Free Software were just unheard.

  60. Way to Dress Up RMS by Kagato · · Score: 1

    Here's a little side note. When attempting to meet heads of state, you might want to dress the part of someone who's serious.

  61. The Medium is the Message. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And if the medium is RMS, I wouldn't want to hear the message.

    Either look the part, or get someone who does to go in your place.

  62. long haired man in a t-shirt pushed back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    is all i can see by the photos
    embarassing that OpenSource communities are ok with this type of person trying represent anything (even himself) i wouldnt let this man into a bar let alone govermental buildings

    if RMS doesnt want to change his appearance (like losing weight and looking respectable) thats fine, just dont try and mix with people that do, visual impressions are everything (ask any Brand(TM) manager)

    shame on him and shame on the OSS community who he says he represents
    he just put your cause back by a long way

  63. Stallman may be wrong but so are the French by Flying+pig · · Score: 1
    This is Europe, not the US. Politicians are supposed to pretend to be just like us. Look at the British Prime Minister. He is in fact a member of the traditional upper classes (but Scots) just like his Conservative opposite number, but he tries to talk and behave in public like a typical City of London bank worker. (Mind you, Bush is a Connecticut aristo who pretends to be a Texan. No difference there.) It is necessary to give the illusion of democracy, even though the UK is actually run for years at a time by elective dictatorships. So when someone turns up at the gates of Downing Street with a long petition, the security guards check them out then allow someone to deliver the petition to someone inside Downing Street who passes it on to the duty PR officer who decides what action to take. (Bin or spin)

    The French expect their politicans to be crooks but they expect them to be 'un mec' - to give the impression that they behave just like us despite having gone to ENA. (c'est un vieil escroc mais c'est notre escroc a nous, as a taxi driver said to me once.) Perhaps the security guard here was confused between his role as soother of nutters ("Of course the Minister will read your petition") and his role of protecting politicians from rude and vulgar Americans. You just can't get the quality of security guards these days.

    --
    Pining for the fjords
    1. Re:Stallman may be wrong but so are the French by koreaman · · Score: 0

      C'est quoi un "escroc"?

      Je sais ce que c'est ENA mais je ne connais pas ce mot.

    2. Re:Stallman may be wrong but so are the French by chawly · · Score: 1

      "Un escroc" is somebody who might be considered as a confidence trickster (a con man). You might want to look up the French word "escroquerie" or the English word "escrow"(in this context). Hope this helps.

      --
      How many beans make five, anyhow ? ... Charles Walmsley
  64. Re:No appointment and he was pushed back? Horror! by Moofie · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Fifteen whole days? Come on. I can't get a mail in rebate processed that fast, never mind an application to meet with the head of state of a major nation.

    Let's be a bit realistic, shall we?

    --
    Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
  65. Re:No appointment and he was pushed back? Horror! by metlin · · Score: 1

    You write again, you wait and find other ways to convince them.

    Walking straight, for all it is, would definitely be the wrong way to go about it.

  66. What's the point of visiting Mr. De Villepin? by Annoyed+broccoli · · Score: 3, Insightful

    For the love of Pete... This has to be the most damaging form of protest ever. Folks! Wake up! This is counter-productive! France is voting for a new president and a new parliament next year. Why don't you go and make your case to Segolene Royal and Nicolas Sarkozi? Why aren't you showing your petition to your MP? What are you trying to achieve by meeting a prime minister who has less than a year in office, and has 30% approval rate? You may think that there is nothing to life other than being anti-DRM and pro-OSS, but over 10% of the French population is unemployed, the suburbs were burning last fall and student protests were paralyzing the country a couple months ago. Have a bit of perspective here. The dude has to prioritize. He knows he ain't staying, and pissing you off is probably an acceptable trade-off to him building his legacy with the population at large. So please, please, please stop the whining and come back when you have a better game plan. Actions as such are your cause.

    1. Re:What's the point of visiting Mr. De Villepin? by Salsaman · · Score: 1

      Have you ever considered, perhaps if France had a thriving Free Software community, unemployment might fall below 10%, and there might not be so many riots ?

  67. Re:No appointment and he was pushed back? Horror! by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    For they are not just "someone" but 3 individuals quite involved into this DRM saga, thus having points and a petition to be discussed.

    Jeez, come on. Most of the geek community knows who RMS is, but in world leader terms, he is NOBODY. He has very little influence. Linus Torvalds has ten times the influence, and even he isn't that important in the big picture.

    Bill Gates is received with all the honors by the President and RMS & Co can't even reach the prime minister or even some random official guy ?

    Gee, I wonder why? Bill Gates makes the software that a large percentage of the world uses. He has the biggest charitable foundation in history. Even if you discount software, he is one of the most influential people in the world.

    --
    Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
  68. Re:No appointment and he was pushed back? Horror! by advocate_one · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Bill Gates can 1) put backdoors into the French version of windows for the benefit of the French government/security services. 2) give the French security services the keys to backdoors in other versions of windows. 3) he can also switch research funding out of France resulting in loss of jobs and tax revenue. 4) conversely, he can switch research funding into France resulting in jobs and tax revenue. 5) controls an enormous "slush" fund which can be used to allow windows to win contracts against Linux when they come up for bidding

    --
    Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
  69. Re:No appointment and he was pushed back? Horror! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >So basically the guy with lots of money gets a meeting, but the guy who represents 165,000 people does not?

    Yes. It may sound strange to you but compared to Gates' wealth, 165000 people are nothing at all. I doubt 1'650'000 would count as well. Any industry of Microsoft's size means to the governments of the world far more than a sizeable part of their population, because hear hear, it's the economy that counts, not your insignificant petty life.

    >What a remarkably clear-cut demonstration that democracy is dead and plutocracy has taken its place.

    Yes again. How many demonstration do you still need to understand? Money talks loud and clear and is obeyed. People are a dime per dozen. Get over it.

  70. I misread that! by kimvette · · Score: 4, Funny

    At first glance I mis-read the headline as "French PM unreceptive to PMS" and my first thought was he must not get along well with his wife. *chuckle*

    --
    The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
  71. Re:No appointment and he was pushed back? Horror! by DaPoulpe · · Score: 1

    The head of state would be Jacques Chirac http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/President_of_France.

    They didn't even bother asking that high, any official would have been good enough I guess.
    I'm not a RMS fanboy, but frankly it's a deliberate "F*ck off" from the French government...

  72. Re:No appointment and he was pushed back? Horror! by jcidiotashram · · Score: 1

    i think they thought that just say the name "Richard Stallman and his organization FSF", all the doors will just open wide. why don't they just pick a number and wait in line.

  73. Not very funny. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I know it's a common joke amongst Americans to make fun of the French, but that's likely just because most Americans have very little, if any, understanding of French history.

    Simply put, the French know far more about war than America. Take World War I, for example. France sustained over 1400000 dead citizens (both military and civilian). The US, on the other hand, suffered a mere 126000 or so. France suffered over ten times as many dead, for those of you who aren't good at math. Of course, that doesn't consider the utter physical destruction much of their country faced. Even today you can still see crater holes dug by shells.

    France also suffered more dead in WWII (approx. 560000). The US suffered about 418000 dead, but many of those deaths were in the Pacific theatre, and thus had nothing to do with France, let alone Europe.

    Of course, those were just the conflicts of the 20th century. We could go on forever about their colonial warfare. America today is only just beginning to truly explore that realm, with their adventures in Iraq and Afghanistan. At least the French were somewhat successful in their colonial affairs.

    Most Americans don't even know of all the help that the French offered the Americans during the War of Independence. Many of the rednecks in places like Louisiana, Oklahoma, parts of Texas, and Mississippi wouldn't even be alive today were it not for their French ancestors.

    Going back even further, France is no stranger to the wars and conflicts between feuding lords and principalities.

    When one who understands history hears Americans rally on about "Freedom fries" and how the French as supposedly "surrender monkeys", such an individual always lets out a hearty laugh. Part of it is directed at the sheer ignorance and stupidity of the American making such statements, with the rest going towards the fact that America has never known real war, while the French have many times over. To accuse them of being weak is the sort of statement only a complete moron could make.

    1. Re:Not very funny. by Spankophile · · Score: 1

      > I know it's a common joke amongst Americans to make fun of the French, but that's likely just because most Americans have very little, if any, understanding of anything.

      Fixed.

    2. Re:Not very funny. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm, we seem to have a better understanding of how to win wars than the French do.
      Oh and showers. We take them daily.

    3. Re:Not very funny. by sidfaiwu · · Score: 1

      It is sad how quickly we Americans have forgotten the invaluable help we received from the French during the American Revolutionary War (and the aid the north received during the American Civil War). It would surprise most of us to learn that France was THE military power in Europe in the century leading up to our war for independence. We should not let our petty modern political differences damage a long and mutually beneficial relationship we have had with France.

    4. Re:Not very funny. by tomjen · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No the US used to know how to win wars. Apprently that secret where forgotten in Korea.

      And no the US has never faced a real war - the kind of war where your dont know if your family members are alive to dead, and you have to struggle everyday finding foods in boomed out cities. The French (indeed most of Europe) has had those no less than twice in the last 100 years. We have (or I believed we had) learned the cost of war - the true cost of war.

      --
      Freedom or George Bush
    5. Re:Not very funny. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Yes, a certain element in America likes to have an opinion on France. But in a sense, this is good. It is easy to identify complete morons this way.

      In point of fact, what Americans who have issues with France don't understand about themselves is they hate France not because they "surrender," but because in their contrarian nature as per American-directed foreign policy, France asserts itself in precisely the same way as the French would if the situation were reversed.

      In the same way the French government doesn't just roll over every time the US government wants to play GI Joe somewhere in the world, the US does the same when it comes to the UN. If the situation were reversed and France was the so-called "superpower," the US government would act just as France does. This reality is so uncomfortable to modern Americans, that it is psychologically blocked out. One would think given the purported values system of the US that we would respect people who had enough stones to say, "No" when the US demanded something. Instead on one hand Americans criticize the French for standing up for themselves and their own interests, but praise certain other countries for rolling over like bitches whenever the US wants to go launch some dumb war.

      There are those of us here in the US who experience distinct amusement when France opts out of some harebrained US scheme, and Americans get all wound up. The "freedom fries" incident is just further proof of the devolution of a distinct segment of American society; a decent into dumb simian weirdness; I'm looking for atavistic traits to start to appear so we can identify these people on sight.

      You know, as an American I get sick of having to listen to how horrible we are every ten seconds on the net, and I get sick of getting lumped in with a certain ugly element now dominant in our culture. I can understand how French people get sick of hearing this "surrender" shit every five minutes (and I'm sure modern Germans get tired of watching people try to wind them up about a certain period in their past).

      Making blanket nationalistic statements against a whole people may be satisfying for a moment, but it can also be dispiriting to those of us in these countries who on one hand acknowledge the excesses of our own governments and cultures, and are kind of stuck with the situation, and get lumped in with the loudest and most obnoxious of our fellow citizens.

      And while I acknowledge this growing cloud of Dumb hanging over the United States, I also refuse to accept that that cloud of Dumb exclusively defines us as a people. I refuse to look at the most ugly and obnoxious people in our country, who have in recent years been ascendant and have controlled the debate, and allow others to point to them and say, "That, there, is what the United States is." Because I am here too, as are many people who are disgusted. Our time will come, too.

      Believe me, as much as it may annoy you to read tired, worn, cliche, unoriginal, trite comments about France, keep in mind that there are many reasonably intelligent people who have to live here next door to the people who make these idiotic comments on a daily basis. Their aggressive stupidity is not limited to the France-bashing. The France bashing is a symptom of a deeper problem, and these people vote.

      I'd apologize for the freedom fries crap except, the people who did that don't represent me. They may claim to and people may recognize them as such but they are, to me, a distinctly alien crowd of people who have nothing to do with me, my interests, or my personal ideas of what the United States is supposed to be about (not that I even grant that the common criticisms of the US are all entirely valid, though many of them are).

      Besides, we all know the reality about war - Americans have for several decades now truly enjoyed war...so long as it happens far away and doesn't impact them. I guarantee that as soon as war *inconveniences* the average American by, say, oh, happening on US soil, we'll

    6. Re:Not very funny. by mOdQuArK! · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think the U.S. Civil War had a lot of those experiences, but you're probably correct when talking about facing an external enemy. (Is it a surprise that the citizens of the U.S. are their own worst enemies?)

      Add in that the U.S. public doesn't seem to have much respect for their elders and/or history, it's probably accurate to say that (aside from the people who have seen down-and-dirty military action), the U.S. public has no concept of what war is really like (and probably has some very distorted notions about it from Hollywood).

      BTW, I count myself among the uninformed U.S. public, although I've got a vivid enough imagination so that I'm damn sure I want to _stay_ ignorant of such an existence.

    7. Re:Not very funny. by KiloByte · · Score: 0, Troll

      Simply put, the French know far more about war than America. Take World War I, for example. France sustained over 1400000 dead citizens (both military and civilian). The US, on the other hand, suffered a mere 126000 or so. France suffered over ten times as many dead, for those of you who aren't good at math.

      For those of you who aren't good at strategy, the more you know about war, the less men you lose.

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    8. Re:Not very funny. by susano_otter · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You do realize that the French system of government has changed several times since they gave us help during the Revolutionary War, right?

      In fact, the France of that time period was ruled by a king, who gave us help during the Revolutionary war. Considering that the help didn't even come from a democracy representing the people of France of that time, exactly how much credit should we give their descendents today for that help?

      I mean, let's take a slightly broader view of history, for just a moment.

      During the Revolutionary War, England was ruled by a king, and its government oppressed Americans. Since then, its regime has changed. Now it's ruled by a democratic parliament, and its government and people are generally friendly towards Americans. Americans generally give the British people credit for their friendship.

      During the Revolutionary War, France was ruled by a king, and its government helped Americans. Since then, its regime has changed. Now it's ruled by a democratic parliament, and its government and people are generally unfriendly to Americans. Americans generally give the French people credit for their unfriendship.

      It's not that we've forgotten what the French did for us during the Revolutionary War. It's that we've also remembered what they've done for us lately.

      By your logic, we should always hate the British for what they did during the Revolutionary war. And we should never forgive the Germans for Nazism and the Holocaust. And of course the Swedes will always be nothing more than big jerks, on account of the whole Viking thing.

      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

    9. Re:Not very funny. by sidfaiwu · · Score: 1

      Your point is well taken. The height of French military power has always been under a monarch. I'm also did not mean to imply that their historical assistance entitles them to treat us however they want. It should only be one factor that should be considered and should be appropriately weighted for how significant the help was, how long ago it occurred, and how different the government was at the time (thanks for adding that factor to my list). My point is that we tend to completely discount the significance of their aid to us and its impact on our history and culture. The 'what have you done for us lately' attitude ignores the long-term role that culture plays.

      On a side note, it is quite ironic that their assistance that helped us during the Revolutionary War inspired their people to overthrow their monarch a few years later.

    10. Re:Not very funny. by susano_otter · · Score: 1

      Deliciously ironic, in fact.

      And I got a little carried away in my response. I agree that it's good to take lots of factors into account. I guess I just believe that for the Revolutionary War period, Americans are giving both the British and French policies exactly the weight they deserve today.

      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

    11. Re:Not very funny. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "France also suffered more dead in WWII (approx. 560000). The US suffered about 418000 dead, but many of those deaths were in the Pacific theatre, and thus had nothing to do with France, let alone Europe."
      "America has never known real war"

      What, not enough dead americans in WWI and WWII for you? In the US Civil War there was approx 620,000 dead. Seems like real war to me.....

      To me, the help the US provided in WWII more than pays back for the help France gave during the american revolution.

    12. Re:Not very funny. by ex-geek · · Score: 1
      I know it's a common joke amongst Americans to make fun of the French

      I don't get that either. Europeans make all kinds of jokes about the French, but this whole theme about surrendering is barely known over here.

      In Germany and Austria, it is the Italians who are usually accused of being lousy fighters and defectors.
    13. Re:Not very funny. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And of course the Swedes will always be nothing more than big jerks, on account of the whole Viking thing.

      you HAD to bring that up...

      They plundered our women and raped out cattle! the Viking bastards!

      My cows will never be the same!

    14. Re:Not very funny. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For those of you who aren't good at strategy, the more you know about war, the less men you lose.

      It's as insulting as it is ignorant of facts : When you can choose your war, and/or the time to enter it, and/or the battleground, and and/or the number of soldiers you send, it can help a lot your "strategy".

      For example, entering the WWI three years after it started helped the U.S. a lot to avoid casualties.
      As did entering the WWII two years after it started...
      The fact the two wars were never fought in U.S. main territory helped, too...

      Some U.S. believe the french should thank the U.S. for their help in the two WW.
      Perhaps the french should instead thank the germans for the Lusitania, and the Japanese for Pearl Harbour. After all, without their "help", the U.S. would have continued to sell weapons and supplies to the two sides, or remained neutral, whatever was best for their financial interests.

      By the way, where are those famous WMD Irak was supposed to produce en masse ?

    15. Re:Not very funny. by KiloByte · · Score: 1

      By the way, where are those famous WMD Irak was supposed to produce en masse ?

      In Russia.

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    16. Re:Not very funny. by Marsmensch · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Balanced, intelligent, and timely commentary on a subject which normaly just brings out the trolls and the most ignorant and vulgar element in slashdot. I have now well and truely seen everything and can die in peace!

      --
      Slashdot: news from nerds.
    17. Re:Not very funny. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh my god. You choose a Washington Times OpEd and Newsmax as your two sources? You might as well have asked my Uncle Crotch or consulted the National Enquirer. You can't be serious man.

    18. Re:Not very funny. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It is sad how quickly we Americans have forgotten the invaluable help we received from the French during the American Revolutionary War (and the aid the north received during the American Civil War). It would surprise most of us to learn that France was THE military power in Europe in the century leading up to our war for independence. We should not let our petty modern political differences damage a long and mutually beneficial relationship we have had with France.


      Old news. I don't hate the Germans for Nazi atrocities over sixty years ago, nor do I revere the French for aid given hundreds of years ago. In the here and now they are enemies for different reasons.

      Got it? Enemies.. as is the EU. The new battlegrounds are economic, and every once in awhile it's liable to spill over into a hot war. I respect the Chinese and Russians because they are known foes. Right now we're at a point with the EU where we're transitioning from the remnants of cold war footing into an era in which new battle lines are being drawn. They bitch about Echelon being used against European companies just as their state run secret service eavesdrops on US executives. Don't even get me started about the deals on the sly with Saddam. Fuck them. I could go on ad infinitum.

      If I were to walk past a European tourist getting strangled in an alley in Miami I'd snicker and then walk on. That's what I think of the EU and its citizenry.

      Now please, throw our military out, pronto!
    19. Re:Not very funny. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The "freedom fries" incident is just further proof of the devolution of a distinct segment of American society

      During that whole phase I chuckled when I thought what might have happened if it had been Germany that enraged us so much...

      Freedom Measles
    20. Re:Not very funny. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Balanced, intelligent, and timely commentary on a subject which normaly just brings out the trolls and the most ignorant and vulgar element in slashdot. I have now well and truely seen everything and can die in peace!


      Not really, we're just snickering thinking about what the OP's reaction will be when the Republicans win again in '08.
    21. Re:Not very funny. by nickthisname · · Score: 0, Troll

      So, what's your fucking point?

    22. Re:Not very funny. by stormcoder · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Wow a long winded apologist. So which country are you apologizing for?

      --
      Sorry my bullshit sensor overloaded.
    23. Re:Not very funny. by stormcoder · · Score: 1

      Most Americans don't even know of all the help that the French offered the Americans during the War of Independence. Many of the rednecks in places like Louisiana, Oklahoma, parts of Texas, and Mississippi wouldn't even be alive today were it not for their French ancestors.

      Ah, the bible belt. I always wondered why the was such concentration of "special" people there. The kind that take the bible as literal truth and want to teach creationism as science. Now we have one more thing to blame the French for.

      --
      Sorry my bullshit sensor overloaded.
    24. Re:Not very funny. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well then there's blanket statements that are in jest. However, I am tired of our so-called "patriotic" citizens, who are, in reality, loyalists to the US regime (aka, yellow-bellied ass-kissers, which make them no better than the french stereotype. These people would prolly put up a little bit of a fight and then surrender if the US govt was taken out and replaced by something else, they'd prolly start kissing the ass of that system)

      They seem to forget France backed us 200 years back, they made the statue of liberty. Some of the people who fought the hardest for American Independence where French men. You can say there was self-interest in that, but if they were truly 100% selfish about that, they would have occupied us, easily and made us a french holding acquired from England through war. Plus it's better two have an ally than a piece of property that is as defenseless as you if you had political problems at home.

      in WW2, I feel more sorry for France than laugh at them for surrendering. They didnt just up and surrender, they simply didnt think that Germany would have the balls or the absurdity to plow over Belgium and The Netherlands to just take over them instead of directly invading. Which gave them zero defense against a full-scale invasion.

      Though France as a modern country. I hate its government, mostly its leader who would prolly get along with our President if they got together and talked. I do not mean that in a good way. Only reason they dont see eye-to-eye is France's PM had interests in Iraq. Which if another country started talking about war with the Chinese for their unjust actions and human rights violations, the US would outright object how France has. (if not moreso, due to its current position, which prolly will end up becoming more benign in the next two decades after multinational corporations fistfuck our resources, what will be left is a military that cant be paid, and fighting for a "moral cause" only goes so long in the military before people start getting critical of their orders, or not caring, especially if they're not getting any incentives to fight when their own country is a shit hole. Russian military got this way.)

    25. Re:Not very funny. by Thomas+Miconi · · Score: 1

      It's not that we've forgotten what the French did for us during the Revolutionary War. It's that we've also remembered what they've done for us lately.

      You mean, like helping you out pretty much any time you asked us to ? 1st Iraq war, Serbia-Kosovo, Afghanistan (we still have some of our kids in Afghanistan right now, risking their lives and regularly *losing* it to help you kick Taliban butt, even though your administration doesn't seem to mention this little fact very often)

      And then trying to warn you when you were making a big glaring mistake (2nd Iraq war), telling you pretty much what would happen (PR boost for Al Qaeda, growing anti-western sentiment, international terrorism strengthened rather than abated) - and being rewarded with the worst campaign of hate ever launched in the US against an allied coutry ?

      Man, who's your real friend ? The flatterer who will always tell you that you're right no matter how much you fsck up, or the one who'll stand up to you and tell you squarely that you're wrong when you are ?

    26. Re:Not very funny. by tomjen · · Score: 1

      I forgot about the civil war, but - as terrible as it was - there where no planes, and targets where mainly military (yes I know they burnt farms and houses but the majority of causualties where still military). I have seen footage of the complete destruction of Berlin and it really makes me hope war we will never see war in Europe again.

      As for staying ignorant I agree. The only place for war is in games.

      --
      Freedom or George Bush
    27. Re:Not very funny. by richlv · · Score: 1
      (and I'm sure modern Germans get tired of watching people try to wind them up about a certain period in their past).

      or maybe not
      http://service.spiegel.de/cache/international/0,15 18,418660,00.html
      that has to be a serious brainwash - i mean, if a pal from iran has to point out that researching history has been prohibited, what's next ?

      Maybe you have been to the United States, but if you have not, I hope you do come to visit some day.

      i'm not from france, but i know a lot of people who refuse to visit usa because of 'interesting' practices required for getting in. accounting for your previous life, derogatory questioning, keeping a lot of private information (us-visit program that includes fingerprinting & facial scans takes this to a new level).

      note, i'm not bashing your well-put comment, i am just adding remarks to parts that stood out for me :)
      --
      Rich
    28. Re:Not very funny. by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      researching history has not been prohibited.

      as spiegel said: Mr. President, with all due respect, the Holocaust occurred, there were concentration camps, there are dossiers on the extermination of the Jews, there has been a great deal of research, and there is neither the slightest doubt about the Holocaust nor about the fact - we greatly regret this - that the Germans are responsible for it

      it was researched, holocaust could not be denied. end of the story. it is not a matter of an opinion, it is a matter of fact.
      under the german law free speech is protected, but lies are not. saying that holocaust hadn't happened is a lie and thus not protected by german constitution.

      anyway, that pal from iran tells a lot of bullshit - on the one hand he sais that holocaust happened and thus israel should be in europe, on the other hand he denies holocaust.

      --
      Conservatism: The fear that somewhere, somehow, someone you think is your inferior is being treated as your equal.
    29. Re:Not very funny. by richlv · · Score: 2, Insightful
      um. holocaust is the worst case of history and pain abusal ever.
      it is turned around a million times and every aspect of it used in some way.

      "British historian David Irving has been found guilty in Vienna of denying the Holocaust of European Jewry and sentenced to three years in prison."

      wtf ? in every other case he would be rebutted, his errors corrected.
      holocaust research is permitted, as long the results are in line with some guides. "any colour, as long as it's black".
      from the interview : "Normally, governments promote and support the work of researchers on historical events and do not put them in prison.". there is only one giant exception.

      but this is too much of an offtopic :)

      anyway, that pal from iran tells a lot of bullshit - on the one hand he sais that holocaust happened and thus israel should be in europe, on the other hand he denies holocaust.

      i don't think so.
      from the interview : "We are saying that if the Holocaust occurred, then Europe must draw the consequences and that it is not Palestine that should pay the price for it."
      he basically is saying "if it didn't happen, then wtf is going on with palestinians ? if it happened in europe, then wtf again has this to do with palestinians ?"

      he is asking a lot of very good questions that spiegel just ignores or tries to walk around - "But the question is: Why among these 60 million victims are only the Jews the center of attention?"

      also, try reading that part about "collective shame".
      i suggest we dig out every murder, every war in history and try to find a group of people living here, now, and make them responsible for that.

      russia has deported, killed and tortured a _lot_ of people during soviet regime. somehow they are not so important as that one particular group.
      see, it's just a business.
      --
      Rich
    30. Re:Not very funny. by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      wtf ? in every other case he would be rebutted, his errors corrected.

      not really. 283 austrian criminal law code

      (1) Wer öffentlich auf eine Weise, die geeignet ist, die öffentliche Ordnung zu gefährden, zu einer feindseligen Handlung gegen eine im Inland bestehende Kirche oder Religionsgesellschaft oder gegen eine durch ihre Zugehörigkeit zu einer solchen Kirche oder Religionsgesellschaft, zu einer Rasse, zu einem Volk, einem Volksstamm oder einem Staat bestimmte Gruppe auffordert oder aufreizt, ist mit Freiheitsstrafe bis zu einem Jahr zu bestrafen.
      (2) Ebenso ist zu bestrafen, wer öffentlich gegen eine der im Abs. 1 bezeichneten Gruppen hetzt oder sie in einer die Menschenwürde verletzenden Weise beschimpft oder verächtlich zu machen sucht.


      it is more or less comparable to the u.s. american hate crime laws. so, in any other case irving would be tried and sentenced to a couple of years in prison.
      rebuttal and correction is what i am doing here.

      from the interview : "We are saying that if the Holocaust occurred, then Europe must draw the consequences and that it is not Palestine that should pay the price for it."
      wtf are they doing there anyway? palestinians are just arabs from jordania and syria. so why all the arab leader, making big speeches, don't welcome palestinians? the answer is, that noone wants those radicalists in their countries. but they can be instrumentalized just fine.
      anyway, read some of the speeches that iran pal made.

      he is asking a lot of very good questions that spiegel just ignores or tries to walk around - "But the question is: Why among these 60 million victims are only the Jews the center of attention?"

      also, try reading that part about "collective shame".


      well, first, not only the jews are the center of attention, second, can you spot the difference between war casualties and industrialized eradication of a special populace.

      i suggest we dig out every murder, every war in history and try to find a group of people living here, now, and make them responsible for that.

      nicht alles was hinkt ist ein vergleich (a comparison is not the only thing that can be lame). second world war is not too long ago. many of participants are still alive

      russia has deported, killed and tortured a _lot_ of people during soviet regime. somehow they are not so important as that one particular group.

      again, bad comparison. as in nazi germany most executions in soviet russia were painstakingly documented. about 4 millions alltogether died in the ussr, most of them indirectly. also, soviet executives weren't after a particular group of people. the repressions were quite unspecific.

      --
      Conservatism: The fear that somewhere, somehow, someone you think is your inferior is being treated as your equal.
    31. Re:Not very funny. by susano_otter · · Score: 1

      You make some excellent points.

      Others, however, think that French material support has been weak and inconsequential (a kind of passive-aggressive ploy, perhaps, to undermine American policy while providing a convenient PR smokescreen), and that French official rhetoric and policy has consistently been at odds with American official rhetoric and policy.

      Personally, I think that whatever the merits of their case, I doubt the French government is making that case out of true friendship, but rather out of French self-interest (whatever that may be). I also happen to think the same about British support for American policy. I think this is the basis of the American perception of "friendship" with the British, but not with the French: The perception that British self-interests tend to line up favorably with American self-interest, whereas French self interest... not so much.

      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

    32. Re:Not very funny. by trenien · · Score: 1
      Just to add a bit... I'm French, and I lived in the US for one year as a high school exchange student about fifteen years ago. On a personal level, things were pretty much alright (though I'd have things to say about the bitch that was the eldest sister in one of the host families I lived with).

      However, by the end of that year, I'd decided I wouldn't to live in the US again.

      What you have to go through now to go over there just clinched it. As long as these policies exist, I'll not go back, even as a tourist.

  74. Re:No appointment and he was pushed back? Horror! by Moofie · · Score: 1

    Whoops! Head of Government, not head of state. Those crazy parliamentary democracies. : )

    I'm not one to subscribe to stereotypes, but I'm pretty sure this is not the first time somebody French has been impolite. There is no story here.

    --
    Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
  75. The next step by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    So from my understanding of the French political process, the next step is to barricade all major French highways with piles of computers running Windows, right?

    1. Re:The next step by loraksus · · Score: 0, Troll

      Actually, I believe the next step is to go through town setting cars on fire .

      --
      1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
  76. Re:No appointment and he was pushed back? Horror! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    "Gee, I wonder why? Bill Gates makes the software that a large percentage of the world uses."

    And GNU/the FSF does not? I wonder when Google switched to Windows XP.

  77. Of course, if it had been a German invasion... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    The schedule would have been cleared to welcome their new Teutonic overlords!

    1. Re:Of course, if it had been a German invasion... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Contact the German part of the FSF ?

  78. Re:He Was Not Invited, And Wanted An Audience... by julesh · · Score: 1

    Just a point of information: the French Prime Minister (Dominique de Villepin) is not a head of state. That position is reserved for the President (Jacques Chirac).

  79. Re:No appointment and he was pushed back? Horror! by koreaman · · Score: 0

    It takes cajoling and persistence just to contact the French consulate and get a visa. 15 whole days is not enough for a top-echelon government official to even get to your e-mail. It really isn't.

  80. PHBs can get in in two days! by doublem · · Score: 1

    Well, if you're at the high end executive level of a major corporation, you can get in just to any of them faster than that.

    --
    "Live Free or Die." Don't like it? Then keep out of the USA
  81. Yes, VERY Funny. And True. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bonjourr-r-r-r, you cheese-eating surrender-monkey.

  82. He tried to get an appointment by fmoliveira · · Score: 0

    "The FSF France wrote to the French Prime minister two weeks ago so that he might receive Richard Stallman, founding president of the Free Software Foundation, before making any decision on the DADVSI bill. Richard Stallman was to be present in Paris at the beginning of June 2006 for various public actions against DRM and the DADVSI bill. The FSF France received no answer (neither negative nor positive) from Prime Minister."

  83. 24 Season 6 spoiler... by tomcres · · Score: 1

    RMS shows unannounced at the Presidential retreat and Navy SEALS are sent to China to spring Jack Bauer from captivity in time to shut him up!

  84. Re:Richard.... by botzi · · Score: 1

    ...is that you???;o)

    --
    1. No sig. 2. ???? 3. Profit!!!
  85. Re:No appointment and he was pushed back? Horror! by darkchubs · · Score: 0

    -- Man that WAS A HUGE step up for RMS, I half expected an old GNU T-Shirt with pit stains :-). Iv had dialog with him before , and well he has a well deserved reputation for being .. well radical in his views. Now that and if Ol, Billy boy gave the prime minister a selective sampling of his NNTP posts attached to that check for 8 billion. well there ya go... a new monopoly is born.


    Richard Corsale someone please visit my blog :)

  86. And what by themusicgod1 · · Score: 2

    Exactly is wrong with "hippy slobs"? What makes you think that you can tell whether or not someone gives a crap by looking at them?

    --
    GENERATION 26: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation.
    1. Re:And what by bigattichouse · · Score: 1

      People wear masks, costumes that denote a role in an interaction. In politics and power, a suit denotes a certain amount of serious interaction.

      Just like someone wearing a suit to a LUG meeting might be met with suspicion at first.

      I used to wear my hair long (+beard, nickname of "J.C." for the look). It was comfortable and I enjoyed it, but in many situations I had to conform to the costume in order to be taken seriously.

      Me forcing you to wear a suit is just as bad as you forcing me to interact with you in the office when you haven't bathed in a week. If you're sitting on a beach, I am prepared to meet you in shorts (even if I am not). If in a metalshop, I expect you'd be covered in grease or grime.

      In a formal capacity, I am expecting you to put on the monkeysuit and adhere to the rules of the game.

      --
      meh
    2. Re:And what by professionalfurryele · · Score: 1

      "Just like someone wearing a suit to a LUG meeting might be met with suspicion at first."

      I think you are missing the point. Those suits are not like the functional wear of the other professions you described. They exist solely for the purpose of imposing social superiority over other people. You said it yourself:

      "If you're sitting on a beach, I am prepared to meet you in shorts (even if I am not)."

      Why shouldn't you be wearing shorts? I mean isn't that the dress code. You have made the implicit assumption of superiority, that being that those who wear suits are better than those who do not. This not only is not the case, but is often the completely the opposite to what one experiences in reality. Here is how I think the game goes. Politicians want votes, as such, they have the decency to make an apointment with a man who on the face of it represents over 100,000 people. Heck if he ran a company with over 100,000 people you can be they would have pulled him up a seat faster than you can say "campaign donations".
      Rule number two, politicians wear those clothes that put the representative of the people they are meeting at ease, not the other way round. Likewise with individuals meeting union representatives, etc.
      Now we are not ever going to get those social rules, but rest assured, thats the way it darn well ought to be. I would advise not being so darn quick to complain when someone has the social decency to wear the clothing of thier class with pride in it's functional nature, instead of cow towing to the financial and political elite (who are almost never the intellectual elite) and wearing thier clothes just to put those barsteds at ease. At ease is the last thing they should be.

  87. Re:No appointment and he was pushed back? Horror! by bWareiWare.co.uk · · Score: 1

    Actually IKEA's tax evasion makes them the biggest charitable foundation. Though I would still buy shoddy furniture before I run Windows.

  88. What the hell? by C10H14N2 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Letters were sent a few days ago to tell the day and hour of his coming

    The arrogance of that is simply astounding. "I shall arrive, you shall se me." Pardon? It doesn't help that he insists on showing up looking like Robbie Coltrane on holiday and certainly not combined with that downright papal attitude. Newsflash, Richard, the rest of the world DOES expect to be treated with respect and that includes making appointments--in reasonable time--and showing up properly attired. Oh yes, you're an eccentric genius...yeah, and he's the Prime Minister of France. Wear a fucking suit and comb your goddamned hair, you lazy slob.

    1. Re:What the hell? by hazah · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Excuse me, but the arrogant one is you. This man saw a future he did not want to live in, did something about it, in the process helped millions of other people, while at the same time he is awarded enough money for his accomplishments to live off of (RMS). He continues to selflessly help people by making it impossible for the "big guys" to take over what could possibly be your life's work and accomplishments. And you... you ramble about what he looks like? Do you honestly believe that you have any point what-so-ever?

      As far as I can tell, an idiot in a suit, with a haircut, and even if he is clean shaven, is still an idiot.

      The worst part about this is that RMS is actually one of the most qualified people to discuss the topic, and it is very stupid to simply ignore him. They could have been polite and said something to the tune of "we are busy right now, how about next month?".

      And don't get me started about how many times peoples' doors have been kicked open by others that thought they had the right to do just that. You live in the real world son, not some fairy tale. Just hope you'll never go through it yourself.

    2. Re:What the hell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Troll

    3. Re:What the hell? by goldspider · · Score: 1

      "The worst part about this is that RMS is actually one of the most qualified people to discuss the topic" ...and yet he doesn't even try to make people take him seriously.

      Like it or not, appearance goes a long way in establishing one's credibility. RMS knows this, yet chose not to expend even a minimal effort to enhance his image.

      For all of his hard work for free software, he seems to go out of his way to stifle his own movement. If he considers maintaning his "revolutionary" vagrant appearance more important than the success of his work, perhaps you should start looking for a new spokesperson.

      --
      "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
    4. Re:What the hell? by hazah · · Score: 1
      appearance goes a long way in establishing one's credibility

      If you truly believe that, then I pitty you. I hope that the world doesn't run you over.

  89. Re:No appointment and he was pushed back? Horror! by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    And GNU/the FSF does not? I wonder when Google switched to Windows XP.

    GNU's software is mostly a copy of Unix tools. Useful, yes, but not particularly influential. The GPL is the closest thing to influence that RMS commands, but even that in the Great Scheme of Things is not that important on the world stage.

    On the other hand, Microsoft influences industries a hell of a lot more than GNU/FSF. I'll even throw in Apple as an influencer (though, they influence much, much less than the average Apple zealot thinks), even though Apple is peanuts on the world stage, too.

    --
    Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
  90. Push back? by theendlessnow · · Score: 0, Troll
    Push back? We are talking about France? Right??

    I think they should try again. Surely just an oversight.

  91. Re:He Was Not Invited, And Wanted An Audience... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Does this man know anything about the real world?
    More then you do.
    Has he ever been to Europe?
    Probably more often then you.
    To France?
    No he tried to visit the head of state of France in Paris, Alaska...
    He could have at least worn a suit.
    What exactly would that change?
    I love how this gives free software such a professional image.
    Let me guess, you vote for the guy who looks more professional to whatever arbitary standard "looking professional" has been decided on today?
  92. Re:No appointment and he was pushed back? Horror! by dbc001 · · Score: 1

    agreed. if this were simply a professional affair - everyday business - it would be considered unprofessional. but in this case the guy might have been quite insulted!

  93. Re:No appointment and he was pushed back? Horror! by Lars+T. · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    The article must have missed the part that hundreds of people write to the necessary folks, and get ignored because hundreds of people want to meet the PM over their little issue.

    --

    Lars T.

    To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

  94. This should be obvious. by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

    Bill Gates is recieved with honor because he's a self made billionaire who's company and products have changed the world. Richard M. Stallman looks as if he's never seen a razor or a bath in his life. Is it really so hard to understand why the guy isn't give the due you think he deserves?

    --
    Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
    1. Re:This should be obvious. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Self-made"? That's one of those myths I really wish would go away. Bill Gates was a filthy-rich trust fund boy before he ever saw his first computer.

  95. Re:He Was Not Invited, And Wanted An Audience... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >>Has he ever been to Europe?

    >Probably more often then you.

    I live there and it happens that nowhere in Europe you will ever meet a state functionary (let alone the Prime Minister) without an appointment and in your street clothes. You will wear a suit. Period. You will follow protocol. Period.

    And yes, LOOKING professional is more important than BEING professional if you ever care to get a job. This is not America: t-shirt and jeans get you nowhere.

  96. Thank you! by CrazedWalrus · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I looked at those pictures and was HORRIFIED by the man's appearance. It's once thing for a 60's computer nerd to dress and act like one in his own domain, but seriously, RMS, next time you're going to attempt to meet a leader of a farking country, please:

    1. Shave.
    2. Wear a suit and tie. A good one, not a $99 JC Penny clearance jobbie discounted to $75.
    3. Shave.


    Seriously, the khakis and polo shirt may partially balance off the boxcar hobo facial hair for your normal everyday operations, but it doesn't show a proper degree of respect for the person you're trying to meet who happens to be an elected official. Remember the hooplah about the college girls' soccer team who met the President in nice sun dresses and flip-flops? Just a hint: you don't half look as good as those girls -- maybe less. Work harder at your appearance. They did you a favor by not letting you in the door. You'd have embarrassed yourself and us looking like that.

    When you are a leader, delegate, or some other form of representative, you need to give the proper impression of the people you are representing. It may well be that F/OSS people are old hippies with too much facial hair and a beer gut, but you do them a grave disservice to paint them that way. By showing up with that list of 165,000 people, you have appointed yourself their representative, and you painted them with a bad brush from first glance. You need to be their best face. The impression of you is the impression of them.

    You want respect (and that's what this is all about, right?), you need to:

    1. Give it.
    2. Earn it.
    ...in that order. Good attire and personal hygiene go a long way toward both. Bad attire and personal hygiene go a long way against. You may have spent your life bucking the system, but at a certain point it becomes self-defeating. Sorry bud, but that's how the world works. Damn, man. I wear better clothes than that to work every day. I'd be embarrassed to show up at my day job looking like that. You want to represent me? Look better than me.

    1. Re:Thank you! by belmolis · · Score: 1

      You may be right about the suit, but what's with your insistence on shaving? Lots of people in lots of countries have beards - it isn't a sign of lack of personal hygiene.

    2. Re:Thank you! by RingDev · · Score: 1

      A trimmed and well cared for beard is fine. But that guy's bear is a bit on the ungangly side, that coupled with his huge mane of tangled black hair gives him a generally unkempt look. The Frenchman could also use a visit by the "What not to wear" or "Queer Eye" teams, the cheap jacket with an off white polo shirt just looks cheap. Cut the poney-tail spend $500 on a decent set of close, and try again.

      Leading a cause may be about an idea, but leading a political group is all about sales. If they are unable to sell themselves, they should invest in a lobyist who can.

      -Rick

      --
      "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
    3. Re:Thank you! by CrazedWalrus · · Score: 1

      I didn't want to go into the exceptions and how-to's of beard maintenance, so it seemed easier to write "Shave". RingDev's response is right on the money. I sport a beard myself from time to time, but I keep it well groomed. If one is incapable of doing so, as it appears RMS may be, I repeat my imperative: "Shave".

    4. Re:Thank you! by bladesjester · · Score: 1

      I agree with the points of dressing and acting the part which you play when you reperesent someone/something. However, one thing has to be said:

      It is completely possible to look professional with a ponytail. I have one and I still have a professional image. The key here is that my hair is kept neat and tied back without looking wild. In fact, I had short hair for a while and people told me that I actually looked wrong that way because it really doesn't suit me (and a couple of those were people that I knew in political offices).

      Meeting with someone for something important? Wear a nice suit (including good, non-gaudy tie), good shoes, facial hair (if you have any) should be neatly trimmed, hair should be well cared for (and not look disruptive) whether it is long or short, cleaned and trimmed nails, etc.

      --
      Everything I need to know I learned by killing smart people and eating their brains.
    5. Re:Thank you! by RingDev · · Score: 1

      I have to agree on the eccentric look being workable. A few months ago I grew out my beard (while on vacation remodeling the house). Just to be funny, instead of shaving it all off again I left the mustache, goatee and some big ol' lamb chops. I figured it would be good for a laugh at work. I was amazed when I actually got compliments on the look. People said it made me look older and more respectable then my 'baby face' look. I keep it neat and trimed, and I wear slacks collared shirts and slacks most of the time at work.

      -Rick

      --
      "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
    6. Re:Thank you! by swv3752 · · Score: 1

      Well, actually, it is simple, just go to the barber the day before your visit.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
    7. Re:Thank you! by bladesjester · · Score: 1

      I have long, curly brown hair with natural red and blonde highlights. I have to keep it tied back - otherwise it becomes the Great Scottish Hair of Doom. No beard or mustache and no sideburns at all. In fact, the sides of my head are shaved well above the tops of my ears and tapering down in the back (sort of my way of paying homage to my old teacher).

      On me, it just looks right. The really funny thing is how often I get told that I look like a fed or a merc.

      --
      Everything I need to know I learned by killing smart people and eating their brains.
    8. Re:Thank you! by marcosdumay · · Score: 1

      "You want respect (and that's what this is all about, right?), you need to:
      1. Give it.
      2. Earn it."

      Bullshit! Those people that don't "respect" him are stealing his (and our) money, his (and our) freedom, and maybe even his (and our) future. There is no way he will gain "respect" acting by the rules and convince them to give away all those benefits. The only way to get "respect" is to take it by force (not exactly physical force).

      That said, how RMS is dressed makes really no difference on the context.

    9. Re:Thank you! by node+3 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      RMS's character is well established, and it would be *foolish* for him to do as you suggest. The importance of RMS isn't based on his appearance, but on his ideals and his efforts and accomplishments in furthering them.

      I can almost understand the advice to dress formally--while shallow and superficial, it's not a bad idea--but the emphasis on shaving is really appalling on your part.

      It gets even worse:

      You want respect (and that's what this is all about, right?), you need to:

      Give it.
      Earn it.


      This is absolutely amazing. Do you not realize that RMS:

      1. *Has* more respect than you could ever hope to have.
      2. Is internationally famous for his actions which he, himself, describes as respecting his fellow man.
      3. Has devoted so much of his life to this selfless cause that it's the height of irony to suggest he hasn't actually *earned* the respect he has gained.

      What you've given is advice for some young lad/lass who's just getting started on a career, and has no prior accomplishments or distinguishing attributes. In that case, by all means, your advice is excellent. But for someone who has such a distinguished and accomplished life has RMS has, your advice is really not helpful whatsoever.
    10. Re:Thank you! by CrazedWalrus · · Score: 1
      The importance of RMS isn't based on his appearance, but on his ideals and his efforts and accomplishments in furthering them.
      ..None of which the PM of France is likely to be even peripherally aware.

      I can almost understand the advice to dress formally--while shallow and superficial, it's not a bad idea--but the emphasis on shaving is really appalling on your part.


      The problem with idealists is that they ignore the real world. In the real world, people *are* shallow and superficial. I guarantee you that this Prime Minister will take one look at a shabbily-dressed figure and dismiss him out of hand, regardless of "his ideals and hist efforts and accomplishments".

      This is absolutely amazing. Do you not realize that RMS:


      *I* know who he is and what he has done. The Prime Minister of France does not. I sincerely doubt he reads up on every one of the people who want some of his time.

      *Has* more respect than you could ever hope to have.


      In certain circles, that may be true. Unfortunately, it's easy to think that, because you're well known in one circle, that you're well known and respected in *all* circles. This is quite obviously not the case.

      Has devoted so much of his life to this selfless cause that it's the height of irony to suggest he hasn't actually *earned* the respect he has gained.


      Earned my respect? Sure. Earned the Prime Minister's respect. Doubtful.

      What you seem to be ignoring is the same fact that RMS himself ignored. He is likely *NOT* well known outside of computing. Unless the official he's going to see is a computer nerd, I highly doubt he has any inkling who RMS is, or what he has done.

      The most important part of being persuasive is to know your audience. This is the part RMS is ignoring, either out of ignorance or arrogance. In his audience assessment, as in yours, he and you have failed to correctly determine whether or not his *audience* knows *him*. Making this assumption is foolish and embarrassing at best, and damning at worst.

      But for someone who has such a distinguished and accomplished life has RMS has, your advice is really not helpful whatsoever.


      My friend, if this advice were not helpful, it wouldn't have had to be given. RMS has a distinguished and accomplished life in the field of computing, not national politics. In that arena, I fear he has much to learn, and can use all of the advice he can get.
    11. Re:Thank you! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You, sir, are a bumbling, fumbling fool for making ANY assumptions about ANYBODY based on appearance!

      In fact, if anything, I associate people who are well-shaven, wearing a suit and tie, to be little more than brainless, unthinking, cog in the machine, dilbert type, PHB "yes men/women" or a corporate criminal/psychopath.

      Shave indeed...hell, the world needs more good, thinking, honest, principled people who may need a shave, not less.

      Idiot.

    12. Re:Thank you! by node+3 · · Score: 1
      None of which the PM of France is likely to be even peripherally aware.
      If the PM was aware, the meeting wouldn't be necessary. The whole *point* of the meeting was to bring awareness to the PM.

      Earned my respect? Sure. Earned the Prime Minister's respect. Doubtful.
      Are you suggesting that all it takes is a suit and a shave to earn a PM's respect?

      The most important part of being persuasive is to know your audience. This is the part RMS is ignoring, either out of ignorance or arrogance. In his audience assessment, as in yours, he and you have failed to correctly determine whether or not his *audience* knows *him*. Making this assumption is foolish and embarrassing at best, and damning at worst.
      This is entirely irrelevant. He's not there to impress the PM with his looks, he was there to impress him with his ideas. If the PM had accepted his request (via letter, so personal appearance won't have played into it), he would not have shunned him just because of his beard and lack of suit. He might think poorly of RMS's personal appearance, but he's not going to dismiss RMS out-of-hand because of it. You don't (generally) get to such high office by ignoring powerful ideas merely because the packaging is grungy.

      My friend, if this advice were not helpful, it wouldn't have had to be given.
      You haven't demonstrated it needs to be given. Did you mean to imply that had RMS shaved and wore a suit, the PM would have met with him?

      You are acting like RMS is embarking on a political career. He is not. As I said before, if he was looking to break into a new field with no prior accomplishments (as an actual politician, he is a neophyte), then your advice should be well-received. But he's not. He's basically an emissary from the Free Software movement. You don't demand emissaries change their appearance to suit your tastes, you accept them as they are, party out of respect for the other group, and partly to get to know more *about* that group.

      His goals are not what you seem to think they are. As I said, I can somewhat understand the suggestion at getting a suit, but do you seriously think he should shave of years worth of beard for one freaking meeting?! You might not think beards are all that great, but obviously RMS does.
    13. Re:Thank you! by CrazedWalrus · · Score: 1

      Sir, you're missing the forest for the trees. Powerful ideas are only powerful if the messenger isn't dismissed before he delivers his message.

      I'm sure you're a bright guy. Judging by your user number and implied age, you've probably even had a few jobs in your time. You can't tell me that you'd wear your grungies to a job interview, trusting that the employer will see that you're obviously a smart guy and give you the job. You may say "Well, if they care about that, then they're nobody I want to work for anyway", but the fact remains that you still didn't get the job because of your appearance, and your statement would amount to sour grapes.

      At the very least, you must to admit that there are a good many jobs you wouldn't get because of your appearance, no matter how bright you may be. Like it or not, people use personal appearance to form initial judgements of intelligence and character. All the wishful thinking in the world won't change that.

      No, I don't think that different attire would have gotten him an audience the other day. What bothers me is that he went looking like he did, expecting that an audience was a possibility, if not necessarily a probability.

      By the way, he _is_ in a political career when he is representing 165k people. What else do you think politicians are, besides representatives of a group of people? Like it or not, when he starts showing up at politicians' doors claiming to represent other people, he needs to understand that he has crossed into another realm, with different expectations and demands than he's used to. That includes dressing and looking the part in order to be taken seriously.

      If he intends to continue directly representing a group of constituents, then yes, I think he should clean up. That includes taming the hair and getting a few suits. Also, if he makes a habit of belching loudly at dinner, he should unlearn that one as well.

      This stuff should be obvious to anyone over the age of twenty.

    14. Re:Thank you! by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      You may say "Well, if they care about that, then they're nobody I want to work for anyway", but the fact remains that you still didn't get the job because of your appearance, and your statement would amount to sour grapes.

      All this presumes that one needs the job. In this case it is the reverse - whether he knows it or not, the PM is the one who needs to hear from RMS.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    15. Re:Thank you! by CrazedWalrus · · Score: 1

      No he doesn't. It's that arrogance coming through again. The PM will continue to do his job with or without RMS's input. RMS is the one who wants to change things. RMS is the one who needs the PM to see things his way. RMS is the one who needs to see the PM.

      To whit: The PM did not send an invitation to RMS. RMS sent a request for audience to the PM. Likely, the PM would otherwise have continued on blissfully unaware of RMS's existence.

    16. Re:Thank you! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't get it. The PM is going to be without his current job, soonish. RMS ain't.

  97. If he was french would they have let him into USA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder if he had been a frenchman trying this on the US would the have even let him in the country these days?

    All I can say is thank god for the France its no wonder people often refer to french fries as freedom fries.

  98. The Dark Side by Conanymous+Award · · Score: 1

    What they didn't tell you was that RMS was actually chased away by a representant of the Dark Side of the Source, DRMS!

  99. Most definately funny. by stormcoder · · Score: 0, Troll

    Correction. The French are no stranger to losing wars. The French main contribution to wars are complaining a lot and running away/surrendering.

    --
    Sorry my bullshit sensor overloaded.
    1. Re:Most definately funny. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


        "...Correction. The French are no stranger to losing wars. The French main contribution to wars are complaining a lot and running away/surrendering...

      And what of the USA in Vietnam? And later on down the line, Iraq? Bufoon.

    2. Re:Most definately funny. by stormcoder · · Score: 1

      The French lost Vietnam first. Iraq is going just fine. Now go cry into you boyfriends skirts you snotty French as licker.

      --
      Sorry my bullshit sensor overloaded.
    3. Re:Most definately funny. by stormcoder · · Score: 1

      Anonymous coward says it all. Run Frenchy, run!

      --
      Sorry my bullshit sensor overloaded.
    4. Re:Most definately funny. by stormcoder · · Score: 1

      Not only did the French get there asses kicked out of Vietnam first they were the whole reason the US got sucked into that morass to begin with. Fucked mutual defense treaty and all. Stupid ass licking French.

      Guess my karma's going way down today.

      --
      Sorry my bullshit sensor overloaded.
    5. Re:Most definately funny. by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1
      Iraq is going just fine.

      To borrow a quote from American Beauty: "Never underestimate the power of denial."

  100. Actual excuse used... by MarkGriz · · Score: 2, Funny

    "The PM of France might just have a few things on his plate that he considers more important."

    Yes, Mr Stallman, the Prime Minister would love to meet with you but I'm afraid he will be busy washing his hair that day.

    --
    Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.
    1. Re:Actual excuse used... by shark72 · · Score: 3, Funny

      "Yes, Mr Stallman, the Prime Minister would love to meet with you but I'm afraid he will be busy washing his hair that day."

      A tactical mistake. Having met RMS, I suspect that hair-washing is something to which he does not attach particular importance.

      --
      Sitting in my day care, the art is decopainted.
    2. Re:Actual excuse used... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I suspect that hair-washing is something to which he does not attach particular importance.


      This is France were talking about, right?

    3. Re:Actual excuse used... by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      That's especially funny considering that Mr. Stallman is one of the few Americans who actually bathes less than the French. There's a fairly typical photo of Richard on the cover of "FREE AS IN FREEDOM", and that cover is online at http://www.oreilly.com/openbook/freedom/

  101. MOD parent down! by p80 · · Score: 1

    hey I really think you should read the fucking article. It says that they sent tone of letters and that none of them was even answered. What else is there to do?

    1. Re:MOD parent down! by krakas · · Score: 1

      Nothing. De Villepin won't meet RMS. End of story.

  102. How preseumptious of him by v3xt0r · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I'm all for supporting Stallman's motives, but his actions are a bit un-professional.

    If the PM has not responded to your letters or request for an appt., what on earth makes one think simply walking to his office is going to give you access to such a high-ranking political figure?

    That's like Michael Moore demanding to meet w/ Bush on the white house lawn and then wondering why they won't let him through the gates. *hello*

    --
    the only permanence in existence, is the impermanence of existence.
  103. You're right on ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's not forget that this government has FIERCELY FOUGHT IN FAVOR OF DRM.
    There has been several battles at the Assembly, and the government has fully defended the majors'positions.

    So I am pretty certain Stallman actually expected this.

  104. In the afterlife, muslim martyrs get 72 grapes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Says so here

  105. Re:He Was Not Invited, And Wanted An Audience... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And yes, LOOKING professional is more important than BEING professional if you ever care to get a job. This is not America: t-shirt and jeans get you nowhere.

    For the record, t-shirt and jeans won't get you anywhere in America either. You dress nice for interviews (suit and tie). Once you land the job, if the company allows it, you wear t-shirt and jeans. Otherwise, you dress appropriately.

  106. rm? by BorgCopyeditor · · Score: 1

    "French PMS" is unreceptive to rm? That what the -f flag is for.

    --
    Shop as usual. And avoid panic buying.
  107. The Prime Minister's constituency... by C10H14N2 · · Score: 1

    ...is the Parliament, not some random collection of loonies storming the gates.

  108. Life is unfair.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The French make fun of Americans and Americans make fun of the French. It's mutual, you know.

    Take your polyanna do-gooder screed elsewhere.

    1. Re:Life is unfair.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's boring.

      The biggest reason to stop this crap, is it's boring.

  109. French Corollary of Godwin's Law by Xillimiandus · · Score: 2, Funny

    As an online discussion in english involving french people, France, or anything somehow related grows longer, the probability of an use of the verb "surrender" approaches one.

    1. Re:French Corollary of Godwin's Law by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "As an online discussion in ????? involving french people, France, or anything somehow related grows longer, the probability of an use of the verb "surrender" approaches one."

      It's not just English speaking countries. Replace ????? with any of the languages from countries that France has surrender or lost to:

      Gallic - Norse - Italian - Arabic - Dutch - English - Spanish - German - Russian - Vietnamese - Algerian - French - ETC.

  110. Not necessarily... by C10H14N2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If they sent it via email, perhaps, but it would be automated. If they expected a formal response on letterhead, no, two weeks is not enough time for a full turn-around. These sorts of things, barring great urgency of national signficance, are scheduled MONTHS ahead of time, not weeks.

    I mean, come on, people schedule theater tickets and dinner with greater advance notice.

  111. Well, you know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tough luck for him, it still doesn't excuse his behavor or apperence.

    Maybe they should have planed it more in advance then two weeks, but that still leaves the apperence and behavor issues.....

  112. So pretentious... by Proteus · · Score: 4, Insightful
    You have made the implicit assumption of superiority, that being that those who wear suits are better than those who do not.
    Wrong -- and pretentiously wrong at that.

    If anything, those who insist that people in positions of respect (managers, political officials, etc.) listen to them even if they dress in a slovenly way are the ones guilty of assuming superiority -- they think they are (or their message is) important enough to disregard the manners and cultural expectations of their audience. That is, simply put, snobbery of the worst kind -- it masquerades as egalitarianism.

    You know why people are taken more seriously in a suit? Because it's our culture's accepted formal attire for business. If your audience is important enough, you will respect their culture. If their culture says "formal meetings involve suits", then you should wear a suit. Simple.

    We already implicitly acknowledge this when it comes to other formalities like the exchange of business cards, shaking of hands, etc. For example, in Japan, one offers and accepts business cards with both hands, out of respect for the Japanese culture. In France, as in the US, one wears a suit to meet with those in positions of respect or power (politicians, management, etc.).
    --
    We may not imagine how our lives could be more frustrating and complex—but Congress can. – Cullen Hightower
    1. Re:So pretentious... by lowieken · · Score: 1

      In France, as in the US, one wears a suit to meet with those in positions of respect or power (politicians, management, etc.). Actually, the way I experienced it, it is far more accepted in France than in most of the US to not wear a suit when having a formal meeting with a politician. Insofar that it can actually convey a message of "I am not another monkey with a suit".

    2. Re:So pretentious... by professionalfurryele · · Score: 1

      "If anything, those who insist that people in positions of respect (managers, political officials, etc.) listen to them even if they dress in a slovenly way are the ones guilty of assuming superiority"

      "If your audience is important enough, you will respect their culture."

      These are the key phrase here. You just assumed that politicians, etc. are in a position of respect and importance. This was my whole point, they are not. Thier culture is not the one which should defacto be the standard in this situation, in fact in any situation. They may be in a position where thier culture is not overidden by thier guests (for example in this case, there is no requirement that they put on jeans and a polo shirt), but it is not the defacto standard because they are servants of the people.

      Your thinking is thrown off by the belief that the 'audience' in this case is the Prime Minister of France. Sure, he is the one who is recieving the pitch, but he is not endowed with the privaleges one normally associates with an audience. Why? Because he is a servant. His job is to listen to the people concerned, then decide what is in peoples best interests. He isn't a manager, or a business person. He is not recieving a sales pitch from one of his employees. He is a proxy for a perfect system of government, a servant of the people. He has no right to expect people to wear anything when addressing him and the social norm when meeting a servant is to wear whatever you like. People will wear what they damn well please when they meet him and he had better like it.

      You seem to believe that people should respect thier governments or corporate structures when dealing with rights issues. This is where you go wrong. When it comes to protecting our rights, they are the ones who should fear and respect us, not the other way around.

      You also seem to believe those individuals who are proxies for perfect systems (managers, political officials) are in positions of respect. The individuals who are in positions of respect are those who do a good job producing something. Art, tools, money, new sciences. If I meet with a CEO of a large company to discuss him or her giving me a grant to do some research you bet I wear a suit. I want something from them that I have no entitlement to. Their culture dominates my own because (1) They have something I want (because they are in a position of respect, because they produce something, in this case money), and (2) I have no apriori entitlement to it. If they want to use the patented design to my new a go-faster stripe on cars that can make them fly, then I wear what the hell I want, and if they were curteous they would learn what I consider to be respectful attire and wear that. Of course they wouldn't, they would wear suits. And here in lies the double standard. Why would they wear suits? Because suits are automatically better as far as they are concerned. Thier culture dominates. And here is the implicit assumption of superiority.

      Now when it comes to a representative of over 100,000 people trying to talk to a politician about a rights issue, I think it is clear that neither culture dominates. Yes the Prime Minister of France has something the people RMS represents wants (control over access to thier cultural heritage), but they have a right to it. He has that control because he is a proxy to protect the rights of the people. So whose culture should predominate? Neither. When addressing a servant, one does not change ones clothes, and the servant wears thier work uniform. In this case, that is a suit for the Prime Minister of France, and RMS wears whatever he wants.

      This is not pretentious. It is simply the way it should be. Darn right when government infringes on my rights or fails to protect them I disregard the manners and cultural expectation of my 'audience'. They are not doing thier job, and I'm the boss as far as that goes (along with 59,999,999 other subjects of Her Majesty, who, if I want to be heard, I have to convince to join with me in petitioning my representat

    3. Re:So pretentious... by killjoe · · Score: 1

      SO when the dailai lama meets the president he should be wearing a suit? When the prince of Saudi Arabia meets the president he should be wearing a suit? Ghandi and mother Teresa should have been walking around in suits?

      --
      evil is as evil does
    4. Re:So pretentious... by Americano · · Score: 1
      Thats a blanket statement which is not true. You turn up at physics conference in a suit and tie and don't have the publications to back up your willingness to buck the accepted social norm you will be less well recieved than someone in shirt sleaves. Same goes for other cultures where the suit is not King, but seen as overly formal, uncomfortable or impractical.
      Actually, *what he said* was an entirely accurate statement: "People are taken MORE SERIOUSLY in a suit" -- he didn't say that they are "taken seriously when wearing a suit" -- they are taken "more seriously" than they would otherwise be taken. He also didn't claim that a suit lends someone the weight of credibility that is not warranted by their character, achievements, and intellect. What it boils down to is that the simple act of dressing up in a formal manner indicates to your audience that you care about the impression you're making on them. This will, quite rightly so, make them take you MORE seriously than if you showed up looking like you just rolled out of bed. In much the same way, would you take somebody seriously if they wrote you an email like this:

      D00D, u r such a n00b LOL! RMS is teh R0x0Rz, DRM is teh suk! OMFG! WTF!!? ROTFL!?!?!

      What a suit is not is the defacto respected attire for all of the groups in society. Academics retain their own respected attire. Socialites have an even more formal attire than business people. Blue collar workers have thier own respected attire. None of the above would consider a suit adequate.
      This pseudo-egalitarian relativism is ridiculous. Go ask one of your mythical blue collar mechanics if they'd get dressed in their grease-stained coveralls & shit-kickers to attend their daughter's wedding. Or, go ask one of your socialites if they'd get dressed in tophat & tails to spend the day on the beach. You dress appropriate to the event. And when meeting with a head of state, the appropriate dress for the event is MOST CERTAINLY NOT whatever your culture defines as "sloppy business casual." Just as a $5000 Armani suit is not suitable for operating a lathe in a machine shop, a $50 outfit that is approaching a state of threadbare shabbiness is not the appropriate attire for meeting an important political figure.
    5. Re:So pretentious... by professionalfurryele · · Score: 1

      I didn't disagree with any of what you said. I pointed out that societies rules are usually defined by the group with authority. All those cases you list merely reinforce what I was saying, that there is more than one culture, the culture of the suit. I then demonstrated that when there is a clash of cultures often those who wear suits think thier culture takes precedent when it does not.

      'And when meeting with a head of state, the appropriate dress for the event is MOST CERTAINLY NOT whatever your culture defines as "sloppy business casual."'

      Here is the cause of your misunderstanding. When meeting a servant of the public on a rights issue, you should be able to wear what you damn well please. THEY are the servant, you are the one in authority.

      "a $50 outfit that is approaching a state of threadbare shabbiness is not the appropriate attire for meeting an important political figure."

      This is not an important political figure, this is a political figure NOT doing his job who is due for a darn good telling off by the people with give the money and authority, and when the boss comes round to tell me I need to pull my finger out I don't dictate to him what he can and cant wear.

    6. Re:So pretentious... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A polo shirt and khakis is slovenly?

    7. Re:So pretentious... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      the simple act of dressing up in a formal manner indicates to your audience that you care about the impression you're making on them

      "You are incapable of judging me on merit, but can be swayed by a mere piece of fabric, therefore I have no alternative but to do so."

      When I stop dressing up, it means I am finally back among people I respect and take seriously.

    8. Re:So pretentious... by Americano · · Score: 1
      I didn't disagree with any of what you said. I pointed out that societies rules are usually defined by the group with authority. All those cases you list merely reinforce what I was saying, that there is more than one culture, the culture of the suit. I then demonstrated that when there is a clash of cultures often those who wear suits think thier culture takes precedent when it does not.
      Well, let me make myself crystal clear, then: IN THIS CASE, given that RMS is from America, where a suit is most definitely appropriate attire for a formal business meeting, and that the French PM is also from a country where a suit is most definitely appropriate attire for a formal business meeting, the culture of the suit absolutely takes precedence. If you want to be taken seriously, and have someone listen to your case, you do not dress or behave in such a manner that it distracts from the gravity of your statement.

      Here is the cause of your misunderstanding. When meeting a servant of the public on a rights issue, you should be able to wear what you damn well please. THEY are the servant, you are the one in authority.
      And here is the root of your pseudo-egalitarian snobbery: You feel that it's not necessary to show respect for someone who's "the servant". Interesting.

      I'd also like to point out that they are not "your" servant, they are the servant of "the public". The public is the 60-some-odd million people of France, of which the 165,000 people who signed RMS' petition is a fraction of a percent... when you serve 60 million people, do you pay attention to the 59.8 million people who didn't sign the petition, or the 165,000 who signed it? This does not mean that RMS is wrong... but it's kind of like me going to the Super Bowl, and demanding to see the Yankees & Red Sox play a game -- "sure, all those other people bought a ticket to see football, but I HAVE A TICKET TOO, so I'll watch whatever goddamn sporting event I please!"

      This is not an important political figure, this is a political figure NOT doing his job who is due for a darn good telling off by the people with give the money and authority, and when the boss comes round to tell me I need to pull my finger out I don't dictate to him what he can and cant wear.
      See above. This is a political figure who represents (for good or ill) the 60+ million citizens of France. He cannot reasonably be expected to make time for a meeting with every crusader or crackpot who wants to have one. Like it or not, he *is* an important political figure -- he may still be "servant of the public" in that role, but he represents 60 million citizens, of which less than 1% signed that petition RMS showed up with. So who gets priority? The millions of people in France who are calling out for some way of putting all the disaffected youth to work so they'll stop rioting and burning shit, or the 165,000 people who were comfortable enough and secure enough to be worried about DRM, led by a shabby-looking American known for his dogmatic ideas and eccentric nature?

      He may be a servant of the public, but: 1) RMS is NOT a French citizen, at least insofar as I'm aware; 2) The people that RMS & his 2 colleagues showed up to represent are a fraction of 1 percent of the population of France. As somebody pointed out in another post, people who declare themselves of the "Jedi Knight" religion in England represent 0.7% of the population there... does that mean that a bunch of people dressed up in cloaks with light sabers (after all, that is *their* formal attire) can walk up to 10 Downing Street and demand an audience with Tony Blair so that they can discuss a great disturbance in The Force? And more to the point, do you think they would be taken seriously by the "mainstream" (i.e., the majority of the remaining 99.3% of the population) if they did so?
    9. Re:So pretentious... by Americano · · Score: 1
      "You are incapable of judging me on merit, but can be swayed by a mere piece of fabric, therefore I have no alternative but to do so."
      No, it's more like: "Since we've only got 30 minutes together, and my message is important, I care enough about that message to make sure that I don't distract you with my shabby clothing and unkempt appearance."

      When I stop dressing up, it means I am finally back among people I respect and take seriously.
      Ah, so you're the sort of person who would show up to your sister's wedding in shorts and a stained t-shirt? Or meet your girlfriend's/boyfriend's family in your underwear? Or go to your grandmother's funeral in a track suit? After all, these people should judge you on your merits as a person, not by the fact that you look like a homeless derelict with no concept of what constitutes appropriate attire for an occasion, right?
    10. Re:So pretentious... by Fujisawa+Sensei · · Score: 1

      Did you actually bother to look at the pictures?

      --
      If someone is passing you on the right, you are an asshole for driving in the wrong lane.
    11. Re:So pretentious... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course not. Even my close friend's wedding was filled with distant relatives I'd never even met, much less judged as sensible people. To wow the easily impressed is what religious functions like that are for.

      I only dressed up for my ex's parents the first time, before I knew them.

    12. Re:So pretentious... by professionalfurryele · · Score: 1

      The sheer number of straw men you have constructed I don't know where to start.

      "RMS is from America" - The people of France can choose who they darn well like to represent them when it comes to demanding government protect thier rights.

      "when you serve 60 million people, do you pay attention to the 59.8 million people who didn't sign the petition, or the 165,000 who signed it?"
      Both. Thats a ridiculous false dichotomy. Sure most the Prime Minister of Frances current time should be spent solving their labour crisis. But not to the exclusion of protecting the rights of the citizens of France.

      "As somebody pointed out in another post, people who declare themselves of the "Jedi Knight" religion in England represent 0.7% of the population there... does that mean that a bunch of people dressed up in cloaks with light sabers (after all, that is *their* formal attire) can walk up to 10 Downing Street and demand an audience with Tony Blair so that they can discuss a great disturbance in The Force?"
      Now this is the icing on the cake. A true piece of logical lunacy. How about I construct a comparable situation. Someone organises a petition to complain about the lack of seperation of church and state in this country (the UK), and get 100,000 signatures calling for a reform of the Lords Spiritual in the second chamber. They elect that an American constitutional scholar speak on their behalf because they feel he is most qualified to present their case. The prime minister refuses to recieve the petition in person, or even speak with their representative.

      Do you see the difference?

    13. Re:So pretentious... by Americano · · Score: 1

      "RMS is from America" - The people of France can choose who they darn well like to represent them when it comes to demanding government protect their rights.

      Yes, the people of France *have* chosen someone to represent them: His title is, roughly translated, the Prime Minister of France. I think what you really meant to say was, "Since DRM is an issue that I, professionalfurryele, think is important, anybody who tries any publicity stunt to bring it to the attention of government officials should be heard." Congratulations, you're the audience for whom RMS' publicity whoring paid off: the segment of the people who know a bit about the DRM issue, and who think cheap publicity is better than substantive discussion.

      And if you go back and, you know, READ what I wrote, you'll see that what I said about RMS being from America has nothing to do with the fact that some people in France have asked him to represent them. What I said, in context, was that RMS was from America, where the "culture of the suit" is definitely the "expected" formal business attire, and the PM of France is from France, where the culture of the suit is, again, the "expected" formal business attire. Given that, it is reasonable to expect that somebody conducting formal business with the head of state would dress in whatever their cultures dictate is formal business attire -- and in this specific case, the French PM and RMS should both show a little respect for one another and dress accordingly. And I'll make a bet that the French PM didn't wear shorts and a Hard Rock Cafe t-shirt to work that day.

      Both. Thats a ridiculous false dichotomy. Sure most the Prime Minister of Frances current time should be spent solving their labour crisis. But not to the exclusion of protecting the rights of the citizens of France.

      So the French PM has more hours in the day than anybody else? When you are doing ANY job, no matter how important or how trivial, you have to prioritize your work. And how do you prioritize your tasks if you are the elected representative of some large portion of your population? RIGHT... by spending your time focusing on the issues that are important to large segments of your population... if RMS & the FSF in France couldn't come up with enough signatures to even equal 1% of the population, then the PM was perfectly justified in assuming that it wasn't a topic that MOST people in France would really care about, or care to have him spend his time on. Call it a false dichotomy if you wish, but you're wrong to. When you're serving a large constituency, you cannot physically cater to the whims and desires of every group of people. There aren't enough hours in the day.

      Now this is the icing on the cake. A true piece of logical lunacy. How about I construct a comparable situation. Someone organises a petition to complain about the lack of seperation of church and state in this country (the UK), and get 100,000 signatures calling for a reform of the Lords Spiritual in the second chamber. They elect that an American constitutional scholar speak on their behalf because they feel he is most qualified to present their case. The prime minister refuses to recieve the petition in person, or even speak with their representative. Do you see the difference?

      Well, it's actually called exaggeration for effect... but to make it more real, let's flip that scenario of yours around: 300,000 people in America who belong to a group called the Southern Baptist Coalition decide that their pet peeve is that the President of the USA hasn't publicly endorsed "Intelligent Design" as a viable alternate to evolutionary theory; The Rev. Pat Robertson visits the white house with a petition, and demands an audience with the president to discuss this issue. The president grants the audience, sits down and takes some photos with the reverend, and then makes remarks to the press about how ID is a valid theory, just like evolution

    14. Re:So pretentious... by professionalfurryele · · Score: 1

      Your first point indicates to me you still don't understand that this is not a formal business meeting. It is not a formal business meeting if you meet with someone to tell them they are not doing their job. That is what is occuring here.

      You second shows that you consider democracy to be more important than rights. Thats called mob rule. When a significant subset of the population demands to be heard on rights issues they have a right to be. 1% is a significant subset.

      And finally you keep listing issues that are not rights issues as counter examples. ID being taught in schools is not a rights issue. Now if 100,000 scientists came up with a petition complaining about the lack of seperation of church and state due to the introduction of religious doctrine in public schools via ID, then you might have a good counter example. It is very clear to me that you do not know the difference between a rights issues and some other issue. Try restricting yourself to rights issues and see if you can come up with an issue that sounds silly. Try some of these.

      Blacks in the deep south complain that the police are not properly investigating crimes against them and are discriminating based on race. 500,000 signatures are collected and a sucessful civil liberties campaigner from Canada is chosen to represent them.

      Catholics in Northern Ireland complain that they are still being discriminated against. They gather 20,000 signatures in a petition and have a Bishop from the Republic of Ireland present it to the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland.

      If you cant see how these are different from: "Jedi Knights demand to see Prime Minister over disturbance in the force" and "Crazy religious groups tries to undermine freedom of religion in the US" then you are beyound helping.

    15. Re:So pretentious... by Proteus · · Score: 1
      SO when the dailai lama meets the president he should be wearing a suit? When the prince of Saudi Arabia meets the president he should be wearing a suit? Ghandi and mother Teresa should have been walking around in suits?
      Enough with the argumentum ad absurdum. Diplomatic functions allow for some variance: when the Dailai Lama meets with the president, he wears what is considered formal for his culture and role, and the President wears what's formal for his.

      The same rules go for other heads of state, and religious figures (three of your four examples) generally wear prescribed garb. Cultural respect goes both ways, that's not a hard concept. But when you are from a country where suits are formal, and so is the person you're meeting, then you should wear the suit. Obviously regligious prescription, etc. must be considered.
      --
      We may not imagine how our lives could be more frustrating and complex—but Congress can. – Cullen Hightower
    16. Re:So pretentious... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RMS comes from a culture that holds suits in deep contempt.

  113. Re:No appointment and he was pushed back? Horror! by bsartist · · Score: 1

    A letter was send 15 days before, and no one answered.

    Fifteen days? Little wonder no one's answered it yet. The letter is probably still working its way through the beaurocracy to someone who can make a decision on it. Heck, in some cities you can't get an appointment the mayor on two weeks notice.

    --
    Lost: Sig, white with black letters. No collar. Reward if found!
  114. Oh for the love of... how old is RMS now? by Chas · · Score: 3, Informative

    According to Wikipedia, he's GNU/53. And ego-mania aside, he's a moderately intelligent individual. So why the hell is he involved in a stupid stunt worthy of an adolescent who just discovered girls are nice and wants to impress them?

    I can understand wanting to see a head of state. But what kind of self-centered lack-a-wit, KNOWING he doesn't have an appointment, having gotten ZERO feedback from the official's office, decides he's just gonna barge on in and get an audience? I mean COME ON! Use some common effin' sense!

    Just my GNU/Cents.

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
    1. Re:Oh for the love of... how old is RMS now? by Cochonou · · Score: 1

      I can understand wanting to see a head of state. But what kind of self-centered lack-a-wit, KNOWING he doesn't have an appointment, having gotten ZERO feedback from the official's office, decides he's just gonna barge on in and get an audience? I mean COME ON! Use some common effin' sense!

      His trip to France was already planned. As an example, he gave a conference on Sunday afternoon. I think he had no real hope to be able to meet the prime minister without an appointment, but he just wanted to attract some attention on the matter while he was at Paris.

    2. Re:Oh for the love of... how old is RMS now? by Chas · · Score: 1

      "I think he just wanted to attract attention..."

      Stop right there and you're pretty much dead on.

      That's EXACTLY what he wanted.

      Unfortunately the attention he garners reflects quite poorly on the Free Software movement as a whole.

      --


      Chas - The one, the only.
      THANK GOD!!!
  115. Screw Chirac by elmerf9001 · · Score: 0, Troll

    He's a socialist worm like everyone else in France (surrender land)

  116. American AV Very Open to DGP by danl_4 · · Score: 1

    Is it really that hard to write out the full names for things in a title? I had no idea what this story was about.

  117. Status quo... by C10H14N2 · · Score: 1

    that ensures that the status quo (and whoever owns it) rules the day.

    Hmm... funny how that's essentially the definition of "democracy." This is why a great deal of protest politics aren't taken seriously. They're making an end-run around the democratic process. Take your issues to your MP and lobby them to bring it to the attention of the rest of parliament and the PM. Get a bunch of people do to that with their respective MPs and you can be assured that your message will reach the PM's desk. You're quite likely to get an appointment with YOUR MP, who is also quite likely to get an appointment with the PM. There are 577 members of the National Assembly. Think of how much more effective it would be if 285 people scheduled "town hall" meetings with their respective MPs (you know, the ones who actually write the laws?) in every department of the country. Funny how that works--and no one needs to buy plane tickets.

    1. Re:Status quo... by hahiss · · Score: 1
      National Assembly? MP? Dude, what freakish country are you from? Here in 'Murica, we have us Congress, with 435 Representatives in the House and 100 Senators in, um, the Senate---just as Jesus intended. ;)

      Okay, okay, I'll be serious. Let me give you a feel for politics where I live. My two senators represent 22+ million Texans (that's 11+ million per Senator), and my representative is one of 32 (each representing ~714+K).* A gathering of 285 calm, polite, and rational leftists isn't (if history is going to be our guide here) exactly going to sway a Representative who has to run an expensive campaign every other year (and so is beholden to wealthy benefactors) or a Senator who is beholden to (i) wealthy benefactors and (ii) 20 million conservative Texans.

      Maybe you don't believe me about how messed up Texas is, so let me give you a feel. The school finance system here is *so* messed up that a judge ordered the state legislature to fix it. So what did they do? They turned their attention to the ``provocative dancing" of high school cheerleaders: http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/metropolitan/3 166954.html

      As Kent Brockman aptly noted, ``Democracy just doesn't work." Though I am with Churchill on this one, in that the other forms of government work even worse.

      * Obviously, that's the number of Texas, not the number of people on the Texas voter rolls. However, apportionment is based on population, not the number of voters.

      --
      "Every decent man is ashamed of the government he lives under." - H.L. Mencken
  118. Shame on you all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...for dismissing RMS' choice of methods, manner of dress, haircut, and so on in this matter. I'll have you know this is *exactly* how I proposed to my future wife, and I'm sure I will win her over just as soon as the temporary restraining order is lifted.

  119. Ah! by jav1231 · · Score: 1

    He must have started talking.

  120. Re:No appointment and he was pushed back? Horror! by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I mean, you're going to meet the Prime Minister, don't you think a tie is in order? Or at least a step up from khakis and a polo shirt?

    Why? Because the guy deserves to be treated like someone special? He's better than these guys so they need to, "dress to impress?"

    Hardly. The prime minister works for the people, not the other way around.

    It is people like you who actually believe that toadying up to politicians, "showimg respect for the office," etc, etc is important, letting them forget who they work for and ultimately results in the kind of blow-off, you can't even get a response to your request for an appointment, behaviour that Stallman was faced with.

    --
    When information is power, privacy is freedom.
  121. Re:No appointment and he was pushed back? Horror! by RingDev · · Score: 1

    Hardly. Dressing up isn't a sign of respect for the person you're visiting, it's a sign of respect of your self, and for the people you represent. He is a man who is claiming to represent 165,000 people, yet he doesn't take enough pride in him self, his work, or his constituents to represent them in a professional manner?

    -Rick

    --
    "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
  122. Only problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On the continuum of issues... With Richard Stallman on one end and Corporate Interests on the other. I find my own views are probably closer ot the Corporate Interests than Stallman.

    RMS is an extremist, and sadly he hurts any reasonable intelligent debate on the issues of DRM and privacy because of stunts such as this. He allows people to paint all criticism of DRM as being aligned with this whackadoodle.

    I just wish RMS would go away.

  123. I am a street bum by biscon · · Score: 0

    wearing clean clothes, you insensitive clod!

  124. Surprising Polite by Fujisawa+Sensei · · Score: 1

    I think the French security were amazingly polite.

    Considering the pictures I'm surprised they didn't offer to de-louse him then get him a shave and a cut.

    --
    If someone is passing you on the right, you are an asshole for driving in the wrong lane.
  125. French Tolerance by __aalomb7276 · · Score: 1

    The French did not support of the idea of giving people more freedom. Imagine that.

  126. net flow, PM is not representing his own people. by twitter · · Score: 1

    MS employ thousands of people and thus in fact do increase the total value of the market.

    Thousands of French people? I was unaware of the great positive economic impact purchasing non free softare from a foreign country had. That makes me feel so good, I might just spend a large portion of my own money to replace my free software, despite the fact that free software works better. I mean, sometimes we have to put aside technological arguments to make sure big dumb companies can continue fucking us. That's the American way, right? Really though, I doubt you would feel the same way if M$TF were French and their software offered poor English support.

    About 165,000 French citizens think the French DCMA will harm them and the French economy. Many of those signatures come from French and US companies that think the law is bad for everyone. Sun was on the list if you want a "reputable" software opinion. Digging a little closer to the PM's territory are many signatures from French software companies, artists and others who feel as if they were not part of the process. Those are people who would like to be able to compete but will be hampered by this new law.

    The only thing more difficult and expensive than freedom is slavery.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  127. Americans DONT surrender... by leoxx · · Score: 1

    They capitulate, especially to Canadians.

    1. Re:Americans DONT surrender... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      They capitulate, especially to Canadians.


      Care to go for a rematch? I hope the UK will take you all as you're thrown out of your own country.

      As I remember it, this thread had approximately jack and shit to do with the Great White North, but once again U.S. indifference to our northern neighbors gets the best of the Canadian ego. Isn't it time for a commercial.. maybe an "I am Canadian" ditty?

      Since we're in non-sequiter territory:

      So tell me oh do-gooder of the peace loving nation, how's that little group of home-grown heathens doing up there? I have to tell you, we only had one McVeigh but damned if you guys aren't hatching em out by the dozen! You guys nearly had an explosively good time!
  128. responsibility == attire???? by hummassa · · Score: 2, Informative

    This is Bull Shit (TM).
    RMS went to Brasil and talked to our Minister of Culture (which happens to be a musician, and happens to have released some of his works under Creative Commons license recently). The minister was using business attire, black suit, dark gray shirt, darker tie; RMS was in his usual khakhis-and-t-shirt. It is an honour for a head of any branch of the government, not an imposition, to receive a person who -- although I do not agree with many of his practices and/or views -- embodies and started the Free Software movement, and keeps on pushing its agenda. The internet would be a very different beast -- if it existed at all -- if Stallmann hadn't written the GNU manifesto in the 80's.
    People who judge a person by his attire are hopefully an endangered species. People's actions define their responsibility, not their clothing. And again, I don't agree or condone many of RMS's/FSF's actions and positions, but I respect them for their work in furthering the Right to Read. Remember that Mohandas Ghandi used, for a long time, only clothes that he had made himself.

    --
    It's better to be the foot on the boot than the face on the pavement. ~~ tkx Kadin2048
    1. Re:responsibility == attire???? by cygnusx · · Score: 1
      > People who judge a person by his attire are hopefully an endangered species.

      Heh, that reminds me of a rather famous man who was disgusted by another famous man's clothing habits:
      "It is alarming and also nauseating to see Mr. Gandhi, ... striding half-naked up the steps of the viceregal palace ... to parley on equal terms with the representative of the king-emperor."

              - Winston Churchill, 1930
      Of course, in all fairness, people judge you by your attire all the time. In the absence of any other information, it's a perfectly legitimate attribute to judge you by. But yeah, judging by attire alone to the exclusion of other attributes, even when those other attributes have been presented, is a sign of senility.
    2. Re:responsibility == attire???? by bheer · · Score: 1

      So your minister of culture is (to put it crudely) a fanboy. Does that mean every minister in the world has to be?

      Also, LOL at the poster who compared RMS to Ghandi. RMS isn't even close. Ghandi didn't get famous for wearing weird clothes, if he did _just_ that we'd remember him today as the half-naked Indian fakir Churchill described him to be. Ghandi went to jail, was beat up by the police, went on hungerstrikes-- *that's* why we remember him, despite his choice in clothes and his habit of sleeping naked with his niece.

      I'll always remember RMS as the guy who went around saying "accept a substandard 70s-era OS and toolchain! because it's Free!". There's a reason real innovators like Bill Joy and James Gosling (who've been there and done that) detest him.

      RMS seriously needs to get that going around like a disheveled lunatic works well if you're fighting for your country's freedom (or you're a rock star). Just because some Gnufanatics treat him like one doesn't mean he'll get treated the same way by everyone in the real world.

    3. Re:responsibility == attire???? by Yunzil · · Score: 1

      It is an honour for a head of any branch of the government, not an imposition, to receive a person who -- although I do not agree with many of his practices and/or views -- embodies and started the Free Software movement, and keeps on pushing its agenda.

      Is this some kind of joke? It may be an honor for a head of state to meet Stallman (although I doubt it), it is also an honor for Stallman to meet the head of state. And that means he should make an effort to not look like a slob.

    4. Re:responsibility == attire???? by FurryFeet · · Score: 1

      I think I speak for a lot of people when I say it's not a matter of attire. It's one of hygiene.

  129. Inconsistency by Yvanhoe · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Six month after the publication of very bad amendments to French DRM law proposal

    These amendments were introduced mainly because of the fear that Apple would have to change its system to comply with the law. Lobbies have used this occasion to push a lot of "technical stuff" over old senators (I believe they are around 70 on average) effectively putting OSS at risk. You can't have both Apple iTune current system and a DRM-free country.

    On a side note, the PM has no power right now and is not listened even by his own political party. The president is in the same situation, in fact, the country is without anyone at the commands. The lethargy should last until 2007, the next presidential election. Do not expect any debate on anything in the meantime, the last important law the PM tried to push brouht rioters in the streets, his current policy is to do "damage control" during the next 10 months.

    --
    The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
  130. orly? by greatcelerystalk · · Score: 1

    When has anyone ever been receptive to RMS?

    1. Re:orly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The 4 people who think Linux -has- to be a GNU-based system.

    2. Re:orly? by greatcelerystalk · · Score: 1

      Ah, well, I failed in my quest to be funny.

  131. Does your doormat say, "Go away or I'll shoot?" by twitter · · Score: 1
    Normal people make a meeting... Or if failing that they write the grievance down and hand deliver it.

    That's what he did, many times. No one wanted to talk to them, so they took their written grievances and 165,000 signatures and knocked on the door of a public building. The police told them to go away and would not accept the signatures.

    This was a purely political move. The signatures are available on line. The refusal to meet or to accept any input whatsoever from the groups opposed to DADVSI sends them a message: we don't care what you think.

    Normal people don't act that way. When software experts, such as Sun and the FSF can both agree that something is wrong with a technical law, you owe it to yourself to listen. Ignoring knowlegable input is more commonly known as acting like an ass.

    Yeah, Manip, you're a troll and I should not be feeding you. Such crap is as good as any for expressing my surprise and outrage at what I just read about. The people behind DADVSI are using force to get their nasty little laws passed and they will use force when they are broken by people doing nothing wrong. I'm ashamed that those companies are mostly based in the US.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  132. Wow! Imagine that, they didn't get to meet Caspar! by gd23ka · · Score: 1

    Your making it sound like these people are special. They're puppets. I'd rather meet their masters.

  133. I too am embarrassed by my countrymen. by twitter · · Score: 0, Troll
    Please wear a suit when trying to meet with foreign dignitaries.

    Please be better informed in your insults to the free software community and the ideals of your own country. RMS, for all his lack of vanity, does not stink. The same can not be said of the PM or his normal guests.

    You do know that Mr. Gates is famous for both his informal attire and his bad hygiene, don't you? See here:

    The photo also unintentionally captures classic Gates: completely wrecked hair, terrible looking clothes, generally slovenly appearance, and two glazed eyes staring out past thick glasses. This image changed very little over the bulk of Gates' career, with the shower taps running at much less frequency than the money taps. It should also be noted that this isn't some heaping of sour grapes from the gutter staring up at Bill's mountain of success; throughout the time he has been known in public, Bill's dedication to all-nighters and in-the-trenches energy ensured a number of high-profile press conferences and demonstrations where his lack of hygiene became as breathtaking as the product being demonstrated.

    Mr. Gates was welcomed as a head of state on his visit.

    Embarrassing indeed but some things smell worse than body odor. When money trumps morals and law, it's not good to be on either side. While there is great shame for the PM in selling out his fellow countrymen, there is also great shame in trying to buy him. There's plenty of stink to go around on this one and clothes are small stuff in the big picture.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:I too am embarrassed by my countrymen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      your insults to the free software community

      Give me a break.

      both his informal attire and his bad hygiene

      Way to go! A link to Rotten.com? Why, that pretty much solidifies your credibility and lends credence to your argument! Especially using the absurd "well X does Y so Z is OK" point!

      Thanks so much for adding value to this discussion.

  134. Re:No appointment and he was pushed back? Horror! by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

    Hardly. Dressing up isn't a sign of respect for the person you're visiting, it's a sign of respect of your self, and for the people you represent.

    Considering that he has rarely, if ever, dressed that way in the past - changing his ways now would hardly be a sign of respect for himself or for the people he is representing.

    Being true to yourself is the only source of respect here, conformity to someone else's standards, particularly a set of standards that are themselves an embodiment of artificial conformity, is hardly an admirable behaviour.

    --
    When information is power, privacy is freedom.
  135. A "troll"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Yeah, Manip, you're a troll

    Interesting, your posting history right now has a number of flamebait and troll mods (quite a few), and the reply to this post reveals even more of your handywork.

    Are you for real?

  136. RMS by zeruch · · Score: 1

    ...is one of the last people I would want making a presentation to a political figure. His dogmatic approach and generally oblivious nature (not to mention his decorum) would make him more damaging than useful in person.

    His tendencies runs contra to almost every tenet of diplomatic/political chess. Linus is a far more adroit.

    1. Re:RMS by Oswald · · Score: 1
      Well, let's look at the harsh reality of the sitch:

      RMS:

      • pros: dedicated, knows all the arguments, enormous credibility from decades in the trenches

      • cons: dogmatic, anti-establishment (he could have worn a business suit), unlikely to make a positive impression

      ESR:

      • pros: years of work in FOSS
      • cons: has apparently lost his mind

      Linus:

      • pros: like RMS, smart and knowledgable, good credibility
      • cons: non-dogmatic [I know, it should be either a pro or a con, not both], somewhat apolitical

      Bruce Perens:

      • pros: same as the others--smart, knowledgable, years of experience and work on his resume; a political animal, can work from within establishment
      • cons: ESR might rub him out before he could make the trip

      For my money, it should be Perens making the trip. On the other hand, he didn't and RMS did. That counts for something, too.

  137. Re:No appointment and he was pushed back? Horror! by westlake · · Score: 1
    So basically the guy with lots of money gets a meeting, but the guy who represents 165,000 people does not? What a remarkably clear-cut demonstration that democracy is dead and plutocracy has taken its place.

    The guy with the big bucks made the Time 100 list this year for funding 1/3 of the world's research on Malaria.
    The guy with the big bucks is the man the President of China (poulation, 1.3 billion) came to see before he saw George Bush. The guy with the big bucks is the one who understands protocol and security.

  138. "Net flow"?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    despite the fact that free software works better

    That's a pretty sweeping argument there. Have you perchance published a GPL'ed AutoCAD equivalent?

    big dumb companies

    Um OK, that's ridiculous.

    M$FT

    Oh LOLOLOL!! How clever!

    About 165,000 French citizens

    Out of 64 million? Impressive. And this was an online petition, right? We know how precise those are. I bet I could get 170,000 "signatures" declaring the consumption of roadkill to be a good thing. Please.

    Sun was on the list

    Interesting. And why were they on the list? So they can sell their own software? Would that be an example of your infantile "big dumb companies" that "fuck us"?

    The only thing more difficult and expensive than freedom is slavery.

    Oh god, please tell me you're on something...

  139. It's all about point-of-view by CrazedWalrus · · Score: 1

    Very likely, the man he was trying to meet with had very little interest in who Stallman is or his mode of dress.

    He does work with well dressed, well groomed, professional people on a daily basis. He most likely does expect that anyone with an educated and worthwhile opinion will probably be smart enough to dress appropriately for their meeting.

    If someone is important enough that you need to secure their support, then they are important enough to meet their expectations and standards of appearance. It's well known that first impressions are the most lasting, so your appearance may well doom your cause before you even shake hands. At the very least, it will be a distraction during the whole meeting. Either way, you lose.

    Want to play the "YOU work for ME, Mister Man!" card as someone else on this thread was spewing? Go ahead. But get used to losing. That works about as well as telling the cop that you pay his salary.

  140. Re:No appointment and he was pushed back? Horror! by killjoe · · Score: 1

    "Umm... No. I fully support anyone who chooses not to meet with RMS, for whatever reason they choose."

    Why? What is it about RMS that makes you so angry?

    --
    evil is as evil does
  141. Bathing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    French papers report: "At last, an American who bathes as infrequently as we do!"

  142. The French were right about one thing though... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They may be assholes, and they may be crooks, but they were right about Iraq and we were wrong.

  143. Re:No appointment and he was pushed back? Horror! by RingDev · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Being true to yourself is the only source of respect here, conformity to someone else's standards,"

    Yes and no. For starters, he is representing 165,000 people, so in addition to himself, he needs to be true to those 165,000 people. Second, politics is a job for salesmen/saleswomen. It is not enough to say to the PM "This is who we are, this is what we think, and this is a list of a huge number of voters who agree with us!" They have to sell the idea to the PM. And in this position, your previous point is partially true, if the PM doesn't think you look respectable, he won't respect you. You could have the greatest issue ever, with the whole country supporting you, but if you send someone who looks like a pressure washed street bum in to talk to the PM, your spokes person won't likely get a word in.

    The PM of France probably gets thousands of requests similar to the ones that RMS sent in. Some undersecretary flips through them and determines who gets in. Will that person schedule some of the PM's limited time to 3 guys with a petition which would likely have little gain for the country, or schedule some time with the leader of an international software firm that employees thousands and provides software and services to a huge portion of the economy? It's a no brain-er.

    To get philosophical about the whole deal, society is extremely discriminating. Everyone is, it is the norm. Some forms of discrimination are frowned on (race, sex, heritage, religion, etc...) but many more forms are not only acceptable, but expected. Appearance, money, affluence, education, clout, and profit potential are all acceptable things to judge someone on. If set upon by three individuals wearing nice suits appearing professional and politely requesting a moment of his time (30 seconds or less to spout off who they are, their voting block, and that they would like to arrange a meeting), he may go for it. If set upon by two college kids and a showered hippy asking for a moment of his time with papers and a huge role of paper, he's just going to blow them off.

    They should hire a lobbyist to at least teach them the etiquette of the position so they can use the system to their advantage in stead of parading about like a bunch of college kids on a crusade.

    --
    "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
  144. Re:No appointment and he was pushed back? Horror! by soft_guy · · Score: 1

    I'd love to get RMS's recipe book. Perhaps he will make an appearance on the Food Channel.

    --
    Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
  145. Re:No appointment and he was pushed back? Horror! by soft_guy · · Score: 1

    That's called being in the right place at the right time - which RMS wasn't.

    --
    Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
  146. Re:No appointment and he was pushed back? Horror! by Fnkmaster · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Umm, RMS's smug demeanor and obsessive behavior about things like naming conventions piss off a lot of people. Not sure if you've noticed, but he's generally not well liked on Slashdot. If he's not even well-liked here among his own constituency, well, doesn't bode well for his role as a figurehead, regardless of what you may think of his ideals.

  147. Re:No appointment and he was pushed back? Horror! by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

    Emacs is certainly not a copy of a UNIX tool: gcc, while in many ways matching other compiler's results, was written quite independently and continues to be one of the core components of Linux and all of the BSD-based operating systems. Other tools, such as GNU versions of "make", "compress", "bash" and "ghostscript" all are fundamental to many, many other tools in commoon use have properly displaced the proprietary versions of those tools for many operating systems.

    Don't underestimate GNU and the FSF: they still do quite a lot of development work, even if it's merely by organizng other scattered developers around the world to finish a project and get something working.

  148. Re:No appointment and he was pushed back? Horror! by killjoe · · Score: 1

    "Umm, RMS's smug demeanor and obsessive behavior about things like naming conventions piss off a lot of people. "

    So it's your opinion that smug demeanor and obsessive behavior about naming conventions undoes every good thing he does and causes you to hate him. When you take into account his entire lifes work you decide that on the whole his smugness and obsession undoes every good thing he has ever done and tips the scales in your eyes to being a figure to be hated and despised.

    "Not sure if you've noticed, but he's generally not well liked on Slashdot. "

    Yes I have noticed. I am curious as to why so many people hate him so much given that he has built FSF and works so tirelessly on behalf of software freedom.

    "If he's not even well-liked here among his own constituency, well, doesn't bode well for his role as a figurehead, regardless of what you may think of his ideals."

    I don't think the /. crowd is his constituency. They tend to be the whiners and not the coders. The coders are his constituency. Not to mention the amazing amount of astro turfing that goes on here. Certainly RMS is on the hitlist of MS and other propritary software makers.

    --
    evil is as evil does
  149. That's because he's a megalomaniac by xant · · Score: 1

    The first clue was that he rewrote the unix system from scratch. Yes, that's his big accomplishment, the giant feather in his cap that allows him to claim the respect of the Open Source* community. But only a megalomaniac would even attempt that, much less finish it.

    RMS is to intellectual rights as Jack Thompson is to game ratings.

    (*Not the Free Software community. Fuck you, RMS.)

    --
    It's rare that you're presented with a knob whose only two positions are Make History and Flee Your Glorious Destiny.
    1. Re:That's because he's a megalomaniac by Zeinfeld · · Score: 1
      The first clue was that he rewrote the unix system from scratch.

      And before that the LISP machine.

      I think he had a good point in those days. It was a bit off the way the taxpayer paid for the research and somehow the code ended up private property.

      I know RMS, I have talked to him, he is not of this world.

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
  150. Private individual? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The man wanted to come with two French people, as well as a list of a hundred and sixty five thousand Frenchmen and a thousand organizations in France agreeing with their cause. The protocol issues aside, I would believe this would be very valuable input w.r.t. the law being debated.

    My question is whether the PM even knew that this was going on at any time. If he did, I can't think of any better way to say "you can take your opinion and shove it up your ass" to so many (French) people so efficiently. If he didn't - well, who'd blame his chief of security for dismissing somebody with such an eccentric style.

    As for sympathy, who gives a f*ck about sympathy.

  151. Re:No appointment and he was pushed back? Horror! by Petrushka · · Score: 1

    Yes, I'm sure the French PM is bombarded with people waving petitions holding over 160,000 signatures every minute of every day.

    Of course in some countries you can force a general referendum, on any issue, if you can collect signatures amounting to 2.76% of the population. Unfortunately RMS only got 2.59% of the French population ...

  152. Re:No appointment and he was pushed back? Horror! by jcr · · Score: 1

    What is it about RMS that makes you so angry?

    I wouldn't say "angry". More like, not worth talking to.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  153. Re:No appointment and he was pushed back? Horror! by jcr · · Score: 1

    given that he has built FSF

    That is a major exaggeration. A lot of people built the FSF.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  154. Re:No appointment and he was pushed back? Horror! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I think this kind of irrational hatred counts as a mental illness, personally.

    You need to take a break from posting for a while jcr. You've been acting like an ass of late, and this is probably the easiest example to point at.

  155. Re:No appointment and he was pushed back? Horror! by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

    For starters, he is representing 165,000 people, so in addition to himself, he needs to be true to those 165,000 people.

    He is representing them as himself. He didn't come along after the fact - those people chose him and his cause as he was, not as someone else.

    They have to sell the idea to the PM. And in this position, your previous point is partially true, if the PM doesn't think you look respectable, he won't respect you. You could have the greatest issue ever, with the whole country supporting you, but if you send someone who looks like a pressure washed street bum in to talk to the PM, your spokes person won't likely get a word in.

    With the whole country behind him, it wouldn't matter what he looks like. The PM would be calling RMS for an appointment to lick his boots.

    So RMS doesn't have quite so many people as that, but as long as the PM is going to evaluate ideas by a person's manner of dress, it is the PM who stands to lose. He can either get on the train or ignore it and get run over by it.

    The PM of France probably gets thousands of requests similar to the ones that RMS sent in. Some undersecretary flips through them and determines who gets in. Will that person schedule some of the PM's limited time to 3 guys with a petition which would likely have little gain for the country, or schedule some time with the leader of an international software firm that employees thousands and provides software and services to a huge portion of the economy? It's a no brain-er.

    Yes, definitely a no-brainer to ignore your constituents. Although I sincerely doubt that the PM gets 'thousands' of requests from people with at least 165,000 names on their petitions - I do have to say that you are right, that's the way modern business, er, politics, is done, francs before brains.

    They should hire a lobbyist to at least teach them the etiquette of the position so they can use the system to their advantage in stead of parading about like a bunch of college kids on a crusade

    Basically, you are saying that RMS needs to "respect mah authoritae!" - but if he were the type to be so obeisant in the first place, he would never be where he is today. The president of India seemed to have no such qualms about meeting with RMS. The French PM blows him and his ideas off at his own peril.

    --
    When information is power, privacy is freedom.
  156. Re:No appointment and he was pushed back? Horror! by killjoe · · Score: 1

    I don't think he is looking for an audience with you but hey maybe one day he will and you can turn him down. That would show him!

    --
    evil is as evil does
  157. Re:No appointment and he was pushed back? Horror! by killjoe · · Score: 1

    "That is a major exaggeration. A lot of people built the FSF."

    I suppose it makes you feel better to minimize his efforts. You still haven't answered any of my points though.

    --
    evil is as evil does
  158. Re:No appointment and he was pushed back? Horror! by jcr · · Score: 1

    I don't think he is looking for an audience with you

    Heh.. You've never met him, have you?

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  159. Re:No appointment and he was pushed back? Horror! by jcr · · Score: 1

    I suppose it makes you feel better to minimize his efforts.

    On the contrary! I'm quite aware of RMS's tireless efforts to belittle and deride the work of anyone who chooses to give software away under terms that don't meet with his approval. HIs efforts are great, indeed.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  160. Re:No appointment and he was pushed back? Horror! by jcr · · Score: 1

    I think this kind of irrational hatred counts as a mental illness, personally.

    Hatred? WTF are you talking about? RMS will never be important enough to hate.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  161. Is this the guy that represents us? by IDontLinkMondays · · Score: 1

    Well really, come on, we're talking about RMS here. Where will his stupidity end. There is noone that can take away from him his accomplishments in software development. Noone can even take away the fact that he was the beginning of GNU. The principles he stands for have been around for ages before and will exist for ever after. They're not new, they're not revolutionary. It's just the first time in history there is a medium where a person voicing his ideas can be publicly heard without being a member of royalty or head of a country.

    So, here's the deal. Why doesn't FSF, EFF, etc... ditch this loud mouthed radical idiot and use the massive amount of money they manage to collect to hire a legitimate CEO or spokesperson to represent them. I mean, get one of the "suits" that used to run 50% of IBM or saved Xerox at some point. Or even a former SGI or Cray guy. Hell... this is a stretch, but I would imagine that Carly is looking for a job these days.

    It takes a person that can actually get their foot in the door by speaking the same political language as the politicians to make the changes that RMS is talking about. If it takes a person like Bill Gates, Larry Ellison, etc... to open doors and have their voices heard... well that's what FSF and EFF need. They need someone with a suit, a tie, and money.

    Here is my best recommendation, Mark Andreeson. Although most would agree he's become a blabbering idiot as of late, he has a certain credibility from his past at Netscape that lets him get through doors to politicians. If he can learn to tone it down, learn to speak to others as peers or superiors (even if they are 10 notches down the intellectual food chain) and learn to present his ideas in a way what make sense to the politicians instead of slapping them around and calling them stupid and saying "You listen to me, I'm smarter than you". Then he would be a prime candidate, young, bright, and most importantly wealthy enough to mingle with the rich and powerful.

    You just have to realize that politicians are not engineers, they typically lack the ability to understand things that are complex. They can understand basic action and reaction reasoning, but when there are too many variables, it has to be simplified for them. But keep in mind, these are powerful people that understand they are powerful, they need to be made to feel as if they're intelligent and information needs to be laid out for them in a way that makes them feel as if they made the connection. If you want them to hear you, then instead of presenting them a "solution", instead present them a problem defined in such a way that they can solve it exactly as you'd like it, leave no other ways. Instead of presenting the solution straight out, explain the problem, if they ask your opinion for a solution, offer them a slightly flawed version of your own solution, explain the weakness in the reasoning and let them figure out the missing part on their own.

    Although I'm not a fan of the overall structure of Plato's Republic, you should read it to learn the oldest known method of political persuasion. If you don't see my point from that, then find someone who does since this is how politics has worked for thousands of years and will work for thousands to come. But, RMS is a bull in a glass store, you need a "Socrates".

    1. Re:Is this the guy that represents us? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you notice that Socrates was not particularly liked (because he always questioned everything), and that people complained about his looks. Do you really think of Socrates as someone that had political power ? He's famous because restrospectively we know he was right in questionning, but people don't like to be proven wrong or even to be forced to think about their position. If you want to convince them, you'd better send someone that makes it look like he agrees with them, and makes them change their mind without them noticing.

  162. Re:No appointment and he was pushed back? Horror! by killjoe · · Score: 1

    Once again feel free to minimize his accomplishments if it makes you feel better. It would be an interesting exercize to list your accomplishments and compare them to his though.

    For example I think your ability to belittle and deride the work of people you hate is much greater then his. Your posts in this thread prove that.

    --
    evil is as evil does
  163. Re:No appointment and he was pushed back? Horror! by killjoe · · Score: 1

    No I haven't. Could you maybe post an email of him requesting an audience with you or scan the letter you recieved where he is asking for an audience with you?

    Thanks.

    --
    evil is as evil does
  164. Re:No appointment and he was pushed back? Horror! by RingDev · · Score: 1

    "those people chose him and his cause"

    I would be willing to bet most of those people chose his CAUSE and had no idea who the man at the helm was.

    "Yes, definitely a no-brainer to ignore your constituents. Although I sincerely doubt that the PM gets 'thousands' of requests from people with at least 165,000 names on their petitions - I do have to say that you are right, that's the way modern business, er, politics, is done, francs before brains."

    He likely does, although not in the form of a petition. The problem with petitions is that many people will sign them, but not all of those people will vote, nor will they side with the petition when it comes to action time. Also, there was no mention of how the petition was formed, it could have been a publicly accessible website, which means that 165,000 people (about .3% of France's population) might not even be French! And on top of that, the people who make the petition with target their primary demographics, so the names on that list are not representative of the public at large. Compare that to a meeting with an industrial giant that could create 40,000 jobs in the labor pool, support companies and community growth could almost double that number. Who would you spend your time talking to? The college kids with a meaningless piece of paper, or the corporate head who can create tens of thousands of jobs?

    Who would the signers of that petition side with? The moral victory of free software, or a new job?

    "Basically, you are saying that RMS needs to "respect mah authoritae!" "

    No, I am saying that if RMS wants to win by the game, they need to learn how to play. You don't win at Monopoly by pissing on the other players, and you don't get legislation passed by looking like a hooligan trying to interrupt the PM.

    "The president of India seemed to have no such qualms about meeting with RMS."

    The president of India is a completely different situation. But if an American, a Brit, and an Indian tried to interrupt the President with a petition with 500,000 signatures requesting and end to out sourcing of western jobs, he probably wouldn't stop either.

    -Rick

    --
    "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
  165. Here in Washington, DC... by C10H14N2 · · Score: 1

    People show up to see their Reps and Senators all the time. Let me tell you how it works: You walk in the door and ask the secretary, who is generally an effete 22yo male chess-club captain of dubious sexuality in a Brooks Brothers Oxford button-down and a bad tie and worse haircut, chat briefly (these offices are generally quite devoid of visitors) and make your case for your meeting. It doesn't hurt to have an attractive 20-something Abercrombie&Fitch type tagging along, who will oh-so-inappropriately try to drag said secretary out for drinks later after you leave (this town LIVES on booze). If you're not an asshole, they'll generally be quite forthcoming about the schedule and you'll now be a face attached to a name, event and issue (and possibly the best lay of their life--these people are SOOOOO repressed, it's practically certain)--this is the most important step. You then ask said secretary for the business card of the chief of staff (NOT the senator/rep), and inquire if you might speak with them today. Probably not going to happen, so you politely leave, saying you'll follow up in a week or so. Over the next month, you lobby that chief of staff-in brief, formal style--listing all the great benefits to the constituency--and campaign--your little event will provide and how you talked to Preston, the humble secretary, who thought it was a smashing idea. It also doesn't hurt to be a gadfly at the political party said Senator/Rep belongs to, such that you can bend the ear of a prominent person (read: campaign contributor) and drop their name in this extended sales-pitch. You may succeed, you may not, but if you follow proper protocol, you'd be amazed how easy it is to succeed. Now, you may not get everything you want, but you will get attention and as you've so keenly noted, you ARE just one voice out of several hundred thousand your rep must represent, so don't get too uppity if you get 1/700,000th of his/her undivided attention.

  166. Terrific. by C10H14N2 · · Score: 1


    Yeah, revolutionaries. Everyone has to turn their issues into wars. Well, you may win a war, but in making wars, you generally make enemies of half the people involved and that's not a very good strategy if you have a long list of wars you're fighting. Sooner or later, everyone will be your enemy and you'll likely end up dead along with your largely forgotten cause...or you'll rule the world with an iron fist and reign supreme. Guess which is more likely?

    Yes, a man in a loincloth brought down the British Empire, but I wouldn't suggest showing up at the gates of parliament in diapers if you wish to be taken seriously.

  167. He DIDN'T have an appointment. by FurryFeet · · Score: 1

    FTFA:

    The FSF France wrote to the French Prime minister two weeks ago so that he might receive Richard Stallman, founding president of the Free Software Foundation, before making any decision on the DADVSI bill. Richard Stallman was to be present in Paris at the beginning of June 2006 for various public actions against DRM and the DADVSI bill. The FSF France received no answer (neither negative nor positive) from the Prime Minister.

    Having failed to get an appointment with the Prime Minister, Richard Stallman decided to go to Matignon (the official residence of the French Prime minister) on Friday, June 9th at 3:30 pm, with the printed list of the 165 000 signatures of EUCD.INFO petition and to try to be received by the Prime Minister and to deliver the EUCD.INFO petition (printed on a 17 meters long banner).

    The delegation led by Richard Stallman was courteously but firmly pushed back by Matignon's Chief of Security who stated that : the decision not to receive Richard Stallman was made after mature reflexion .


    Nothing to see here. Move along.

  168. Re:No appointment and he was pushed back? Horror! by jcr · · Score: 1

    I think your ability to belittle and deride the work of people you hate is much greater then his. Your posts in this thread prove that.

    Why do you presume to claim that I "hate" someone, simply because I'm not a fan of his? There aren't many people I hate, and richard will never be important enough to be among them.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  169. Re:No appointment and he was pushed back? Horror! by killjoe · · Score: 1

    Once again I commend you on your ability to belittle and deride the works of others. You are clearly a master at this long lost art. Did you ever make that lists of accomplishments by the way?

    --
    evil is as evil does
  170. Re:No appointment and he was pushed back? Horror! by krakas · · Score: 2

    actually, it's closer to 0,259% ;-)

  171. Re:No appointment and he was pushed back? Horror! by jcr · · Score: 1

    Once again I commend you on your ability to belittle and deride the works of others.

    Aw... I'm sorry I don't share your reverence for RMS. Does it wound your little ego to know that your opinion of him isn't unanimous?

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  172. Re:No appointment and he was pushed back? Horror! by killjoe · · Score: 1

    Well I am still waiting for that list of accomplishments. You can put "the ability to deride the works of others" on the top if you want.

    --
    evil is as evil does
  173. Re:No appointment and he was pushed back? Horror! by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

    I would be willing to bet most of those people chose his CAUSE and had no idea who the man at the helm was.

    Even if true, whose fault is that? RMS should stop being true to himself because some other people screwed up?

    No, I am saying that if RMS wants to win by the game, they need to learn how to play. You don't win at Monopoly by pissing on the other players, and you don't get legislation passed by looking like a hooligan trying to interrupt the PM.

    I don't think he does want to "win by the game" - refer to previous posts where I pointed out that RMS would not be where he is today if he had been trying to, "win by the game." They don't hand out McArthur "genius grants" to people who are conventional and mainstream.

    In either case, dressing in one's everyday attire is one hell of a far cry from being as disrespectful as either pissing on someone or acting like a hooligan. Aren't you the one who said, "dressing up isn't a sign of respect for the person you're visiting," anyway?

    The president of India is a completely different situation. But if an American, a Brit, and an Indian tried to interrupt the President with a petition with 500,000 signatures requesting and end to out sourcing of western jobs, he probably wouldn't stop either.

    You do realize that your example is backwards? Unless you are talking about the President of the US. Unlike India deriving all kinds of benefits from outsourcing, starting with an increased tax base, more local working capital, etc -- for France, the only benefit to adopting draconian DRM is in keeping on the good side of the US state department. Unless, that is, France plans on making their own locally produced entertainment DRM-free and thus letting hollywood cripple themselves in their local market. I doubt that's the case, its far too insightful for a politician to have worked out on his own.

    --
    When information is power, privacy is freedom.
  174. Re:No appointment and he was pushed back? Horror! by RingDev · · Score: 1

    "Even if true, whose fault is that? RMS should stop being true to himself because some other people screwed up?"

    So you are suggesting that the vast majority of FSF fans are idiots? All insults aside, RMS should be true to the cause. And that cause can be BEST SERVED by playing the political game.

    "They don't hand out McArthur "genius grants" to people who are conventional and mainstream."

    And how many 'McArthur "genius grant"' recipients are elected officials or have independently sponsored successful bills? My guess would be a scant few. I know some amazingly smart people, but most of them have the social skills of a tooth pick.

    Point being, if you want the FSF and related movement to move forward and have a hand in the political process you need to decouple your face from RMS's crotch and learn the game. It's that simple, RMS can rant and rave all he likes, but so long as lobbyist with political face time can consistently show why RMS/FSF is not in the politician's best interest, whether it is true or not, he, and the movement will fail.

    "Aren't you the one who said, "dressing up isn't a sign of respect for the person you're visiting," anyway?"

    Perhaps I over simplified that. Dressing up is a sign of respect for yourself. Following etiquette is both a sign of respect for yourself and the person you're visiting. By following protocol not only are you respecting the person you are visiting, but you are showing that your believe is important enough that you are willing to follow someone else's procedures for presenting it. If RMS really cared about the cause why doesn't he use acceptable and proven effective means to advance it, instead of amateur tactics with little to no chance of success?

    "You do realize that your example is backwards?"

    Nope, my example was exactly as I intended. Lobbyist with access to the politicians will show how their plan is beneficial to the politician, his/her constituents, and the voting public. If a few amateurs try to interject rambling claiming just the opposite in passing, they will be discredited and ignored. Where as if those dissenters hired a lobbyist of their own, they would have much better luck at getting face time with the politician and getting their view heard by the people that matter.

    ugg, I'm too tired to keep at this tonight.

    -Rick

    --
    "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
  175. Don't be naïve by Submarine · · Score: 1

    Folks...

    This operation was, excuse me, a success. Either RMS could get an appointment with Villepin (or, more probably, a technical or political advisor of his), and he could try to add to the overall pressure on this issue. Either he could not, and then it was an excellent occasion to dump the 165,000 signatures into the gutter in front of photographers, and then to accuse Villepin of disregarding the opinion of hundreds of thousands of his fellow citizens.

    Of course, this is a cheap media stunt. It took only a few dozen people to walk to Matignon (the PM's office) and, for this, they got the attention of the specialized media, Slashdot etc. No need to throw an expensive party, as some industry lobbyists have done.

    In any case, contrary to what people seem to suggest, the whole anti-DADVSI operation is quite successful. (DADVSI is the name of the law, an equivalent to the DMCA.) With hardly any money, and against them enormous and powerful lobbies, they have managed to stall the legislation for 6 months, and to incite strong divisions inside the ruling majority. (Not to mention amusing statements by the president of the National Assembly, who declared that the law had been ill-prepared, and that the minister in charge of it was a zero who had put the majority members of parliament in the shit about this law...)

    I suggest people here (most of whom don't know anything about what they discuss) should read http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DADVSI

    1. Re:Don't be naïve by goldspider · · Score: 1

      Of course, this is a cheap media stunt.

      And the FSF will get exactly what they paid for.

      --
      "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
  176. Re:No appointment and he was pushed back? Horror! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dressing up is a sign of contempt for the person whose biases you are taking advantage of. If I thought they were smart, I wouldn't expect it to work, so I wouldn't try.

  177. (dis)informative? by hummassa · · Score: 1

    I have read a lot of comments in the tone of "rms is un-hygienic". Can you inform me if that does have any truth in it? AFAIK, he has long and un-groomed, un-trimmed hair and beard, but -- at least in the close-ups I remember seeing, and in the reports I have heard of people who went in FS events in person -- they seemed to be normally washed and cleaned. No person that I know and went to any Free Software conference ever said to me, "oh, yes, and Stallman really smells bad"...
    Just as attire =/= responsibility, hygiene =/= trimmed hair + short or no beard.
    Now, I know people with cavagnacs (goatees) in USofAn movies are usually the villains or even the evil twins -- thank $DEITY the albinos are taking our place those days :-). And, as a disclaimer, I do wear a goatee, not always groomed or trimmed, but it's always clean and hygienic. Ah, and I wear black t-shirts and jeans to my day job, too -- almost every single day. I wear one t-shirt per day, a different set of underwear for the day and for the night, and my jeans are regularly washed (I use one or two pairs per week). I shower everyday, wash my hair almost every day, brush my teeth a number of times >= 3, floss, etc. Would you consider me un-hygienic?

    --
    It's better to be the foot on the boot than the face on the pavement. ~~ tkx Kadin2048
    1. Re:(dis)informative? by FurryFeet · · Score: 1

      My comment was kinda tongue-in-cheek (guess I should have made that clearer), but there's a kernel of truth there, and I think I can summarize in two points:

      1. Ungroomed hair and beard = Unhygienic; maybe not in the strictest sense, but at an emotional level.
      2. I have been close to RMS a couple of times and... well, I don't want to descend to kindergarden level rethorics, but I have to say that he kinda... well... smells. Just my percepction and based only on two data points, but hey, that's the data I've got to form an opinion.

      For the record, I do wear a full beard on ocasion (maybe 4 months a year). I don't usually trim it, but I do wash and shampoo it. I wore a goatee for a couple of days, but the evil vibe was too strong and i had to let it go ;)

  178. Re:No appointment and he was pushed back? Horror! by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

    So you are suggesting that the vast majority of FSF fans are idiots?

    No, you are.

    I am the one who said that, "those people chose him and his cause."
    You are the one who said that they, "had no idea who the man at the helm was."
    I have all the faith in the world that those petition signers knew who RMS was and the kinds of tactics he uses.

    RMS should be true to the cause. And that cause can be BEST SERVED by playing the political game.

    In your opinion only. I am pretty sure that RMS is a little bit closer to the action than you are. Let me say this for the 3rd time now, maybe it will sink in - RMS got where he is today by NOT playing the political game.

    And how many 'McArthur "genius grant"' recipients are elected officials or have independently sponsored successful bills? My guess would be a scant few.

    And this is relevant, how? RMS ain't running for elected office, he can't sponsor a bill. On the flip-side, how many politicians have had anywhere near the personal impact on society that RMS has already had? Most of them are just figureheads for their campaign backers

    All insults aside

    Funny, you sure can't seem to put them aside, here comes another one...

    Point being, if you want the FSF and related movement to move forward and have a hand in the political process you need to decouple your face from RMS's crotch and learn the game.

    Oh, I know the game. As an independent I play it all the time with my clients - though I do find myself less and less willing to play as my bank account gets fatter and fatter. I play the game for personal gain, not as one of the people most responsible for a sea-change in the computing industry. RMS doesn't have to play the game - not just because of his accomplishments, but because of the inevitability of the change that he represents.

    By following protocol not only are you respecting the person you are visiting, but you are showing that your believe is important enough that you are willing to follow someone else's procedures for presenting it.

    Like submitting an official meeting request weeks beforehand with the expectation of an acknlowedgement, either accepting or denying it? Protocol like that, maybe? Or is grooming really the deciding factor for the scheduling of meetings? I mean, I would not be surprised if it were, so much of politics is just bullshit, that would fit right in as SOP.

    Nope, my example was exactly as I intended.

    Funny, what you 'intended' and what you wrote the first time around are more than just a little contradictory. Kind of like all your back-tracking and circular reasoning on conformist "respectin' mah authoritae" - you've got a tribal mentality that defers to hierarchy and can't quite grasp that fundamental goal of Freedom which motivates RMS. You've got just enough of it to feel that it threatens part of that hierarchy so you disparage RMS and his contributions by criticisizing him for being non-conformist - which is kind of like criticisizing Ford for building autos instead of carriages or Luther for writing his 95 theses instead of following Church protocols.

    --
    When information is power, privacy is freedom.
  179. Re:No appointment and he was pushed back? Horror! by RingDev · · Score: 1

    "No, you are."

    No, I said they didn't know who was at the helm, you are the one who called them screw ups.

    "I have all the faith in the world that those petition signers knew who RMS was and the kinds of tactics he uses."

    Knowing now the types of tactics RMS uses I am withdrawing my support of the FSF, and will recommend others to find a more effective organization to back.

    "RMS got where he is today by NOT playing the political game."

    And I will say again, RMS is not a political power house. Or are you saying that it was RMS's goal to wind up with a broken patent system, the DCMA, and limitations of consumers rights? There are hundreds of lobbyists who could hold a candle to RMS on the intellectual or moral front, but have significantly more political clout.

    "Funny, you sure can't seem to put them aside, here comes another one..."

    Sorry, that was a bit harsh of me. It was the end of a very, very long day. My apologies.

    "Oh, I know the game. As an independent I play it all the time with my clients"

    Then you of all people should understand why it is important to work the system instead of trying to force your way against it.

    "Like submitting an official meeting request weeks beforehand with the expectation of an acknowledgement, either accepting or denying it? Protocol like that, maybe?"

    Yeah, that would be a great start. And when that fails, submit again. Have a successful lobbyist look over your requests and see if they are poorly worded. If sending a well worded request in still fails, try hitting up a smaller target first. If you could get on of the cabinet members on your side, you may get an extra hand getting in for the meeting with the PM. There are hundreds of appropriate attack vectors to worth through IN the system. All of which would have been significantly more likely to forward the cause than that little stint on the street. What were they expecting? The PM would come over and have a 15 minute talk to them about artists and consumers' rights? Then break down crying, screaming "What have I done!?!" Even if they managed to get to the PM they would have a matter of seconds to talk to him.

    "Funny, what you 'intended' and what you wrote the first time around are more than just a little contradictory."

    How so? Lobbyists tell the President of India that out sourced jobs are good for India, the opposition send 3 people out to interrupt the President and tell him that out sourced jobs are bad for India. The President, if he even hears the 3 poorly dressed individuals' message (over the crowd, motorcade, and secret service) thinks back to all the briefings and charts he's seen that show him how out sourced jobs are good for the economy.

    Same thing here. Lobbyists tell the PM of France that stronger CR laws and enforcement will help the economy and promote big business media in France (ie: jobs, tourism, taxes). The President, if he even hears the 3 poorly dressed individuals' message (over the crowd, motorcade, and secret service) thinks back to all the briefings and charts he's seen that show him how out stronger CR laws are good for the economy.

    Is RMS an impressive man? Sure. Is he the right man to lead the FSF? Probably. Is the the right man to take FSF's cause to the political arena? No way. And seeing as how the FSF has political goals, I can't see following them so long as they show nothing but incompetence in the political arena.

    -Rick

    --
    "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
  180. Re:No appointment and he was pushed back? Horror! by jcr · · Score: 1

    Well I am still waiting for that list of accomplishments

    When did I offer to comply with your demand?

    See, this is something that you and RMS have in common: the assumption that just because you demand something, that others must comply and jump through your hoops. Sorry, it's not going to happen.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  181. Re:No appointment and he was pushed back? Horror! by killjoe · · Score: 1

    You know I have been thinking about your problem.

    Here you are pissing on RMS on slashdot like all the other 17 year olds but I imagine this does not really give a feeling of satisfaction. I mean all the kool kids piss on RMS here and lets face it he probably hasn't read your posts about him anyway. I am sure this must leave you with some feeling of inadequecy and frustration. I mean what's the use of pissing on somebody when they are not even there!.

    He is my suggestion. I suggest you do something. I don't mean pissing on people here, I mean something significant. So significant that RMS will seek an audience with you. At that point you can publicly reject him!. Now THAT would be really pissing on RMS!. You can end your letter with "IN YOUR FACE MUTHAFUCKA!".

    What do you think? Here a couple of suggestions. You can write a really cool compiler, you can write a really great editor, you can start a non profit foundation and run it, you could give lectures, you could write lots of articles and get them published all over the world. You know simple stupid shit like that. Anybody can do that kind of stuff.

    I eagerly await the fruits of your efforts. Let's face it giving the finger to RMS from your mothers basement can't be all that rewarding.

    --
    evil is as evil does
  182. Re:No appointment and he was pushed back? Horror! by jcr · · Score: 1

    What a fascinating fantasy world you live in. If I were looking for attention, RMS is among the last people I'd want to get it from.

    Of course, your suggestions above look like great things for you to do yourself. Let us know how it works out.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  183. Re:No appointment and he was pushed back? Horror! by jcr · · Score: 1

    RMS wants an audience with me, with you, with the prime minister of France, and anyone else, anytime, anywhere. It's what the man lives for.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  184. Re:No appointment and he was pushed back? Horror! by killjoe · · Score: 1

    I am not suggesting that you are looking for attention (clearly you are not). I am suggesting that giving the finger to RMS from your mothers basement probably isn't all that fulfilling. If you really want to piss on RMS I suggest you do something (other then post on slashdot of course) so that he will want an audience with you and then you can piss on him for real!. You can post his email on the web and your reply which of course will be a rejection letter ending with "IN YOUR FACE MUTHAFUCKA!".

    All you have to do is to write a C compiler or start a non profit and give lectures and write articles and easy shit like that. Anybody can do that stuff, it's not like it's an accomplishment or anything.

    --
    evil is as evil does
  185. Re:No appointment and he was pushed back? Horror! by Chandon+Seldon · · Score: 1

    Wow. You've made an awful lot of posts in this thread deriding RMS for someone who thinks that he's completely insignificant.

    --
    -- The act of censorship is always worse than whatever is being censored. Always.
  186. Re:No appointment and he was pushed back? Horror! by jcr · · Score: 1

    I never said he was completely insignificant. I said he's not important enough to hate.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  187. Re:No appointment and he was pushed back? Horror! by jcr · · Score: 1

    I am suggesting that giving the finger to RMS from your mothers basement probably isn't all that fulfilling.

    Does it prop up your ego to imagine me in this way?

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  188. Re:No appointment and he was pushed back? Horror! by killjoe · · Score: 1

    I am just trying to help you that's all. If you are happy merely pissing on RMS on slashdot then more power to you. It just seems to me that pissing on RMS here is really not all that kewl. I mean you are just a part of the herd here.

    Clearly your powers to deride the works of others is going to waste here on /.

    --
    evil is as evil does
  189. Re:No appointment and he was pushed back? Horror! by jcr · · Score: 1

    I am just trying to help you that's all.

    No, you're not. You're trying and failing to get my goat. But, feel free to continue. It's quite amusing.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  190. Re:No appointment and he was pushed back? Horror! by killjoe · · Score: 1

    I don't mean to "get your goat". I am just trying to help you out. Surely there has to be a better way for you to demean RMS then to join the /. herd.

    --
    evil is as evil does
  191. Re:No appointment and he was pushed back? Horror! by Petrushka · · Score: 2, Funny

    Damn those decimal points! Er, commas. Damn them!

  192. Re:No appointment and he was pushed back? Horror! by jcr · · Score: 1

    I am just trying to help you out.

    No, you aren't.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  193. Re:No appointment and he was pushed back? Horror! by killjoe · · Score: 1

    Ok then. If you are happy being one of the kewl kids of /. who piss on RMS safely tucked away in their mothers basement then more power to you.

    I was just giving you ideas of how you could really piss on him. You know publicly humiliate him and make him notice you.

    --
    evil is as evil does
  194. Re:No appointment and he was pushed back? Horror! by jcr · · Score: 1

    Keep trying, you haven't come close to any of my buttons yet.

    As for humiliating RMS, he does a far better job of that himself than anyone else could hope to accomplish. Getting snubbed by the french? LOL!

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."