Slashdot Mirror


Immaturity Level Rising in Adults

Ant writes to tell us that a Discovery News article is exploring the old adage, "like a kid at heart", which may be closer to the truth than we would like to admit. New research is showing that grown-ups are more immature than ever. From the article: "Specifically, it seems a growing number of people are retaining the behaviors and attitudes associated with youth. As a consequence, many older people simply never achieve mental adulthood, according to a leading expert on evolutionary psychiatry."

164 of 862 comments (clear)

  1. To that I say... by Aadain2001 · · Score: 5, Funny

    They are all just poopy-heads! Big, smelly, ugly, poopy-heads!

    --
    Space for rent, inquire within
    1. Re:To that I say... by Skidge · · Score: 5, Insightful
      They are all just poopy-heads! Big, smelly, ugly, poopy-heads!

      Nu-uh! You're a poopy-head!
    2. Re:To that I say... by Kierthos · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well, um, you've got cooties!

      --
      Mr. Hu is not a ninja.
  2. Myspace by xoran99 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Case in point: How many "adults" have a myspace account? I'll admit it...

    --

    Karma: Bad (mostly due to all those "In Soviet Russia" jokes)

    1. Re:Myspace by crazyjimmy · · Score: 2, Funny

      Myspace? Bah.

      How many of us post on /. ???

    2. Re:Myspace by ben+there... · · Score: 2, Informative

      Myspace started with a group of 20-somethings and 30-somethings from the California area(1). It was all adults when I joined around 3M. They didn't even allow kids on.

      (1) Change the friendID to see the first members:
      http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=us er.viewprofile&friendid=2

    3. Re:Myspace by diamondmagic · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You even post replies like you have one.
      ("ppl"? give me a break... You are on SLASHDOT. Sorry.)

  3. Resignation. by haeger · · Score: 5, Insightful
    [Stolen from some website]

    Adult Resignation
    To Whom It May Concern:

    I am hereby officially tendering my resignation as an adult.

    I have decided I would like to accept the responsibilities of a 6 year old again.

    I want to go to McDonald's and think that it's a four star restaurant.
    I want to sail sticks across a fresh mud puddle and make ripples with rocks.
    I want to think M&Ms are better than money, because you can eat them.
    I want to play kickball during recess and paint with watercolors in art.
    I want to lie under a big Oak tree and run a lemonade stand with my friends on a hot summers day.
    I want to return to a time when life was simple.
    When all you knew were colors, addition tables and simple nursery rhymes. But that didn't bother you, because you didn't know what you didn't know and you didn't care.
    When all you knew was to be happy because you didn't know all the things that should make you worried and upset.
    I want to think that the world is fair. That everyone in it is honest and good.
    I want to believe that anything is possible.
    Somewhere in my youth...I matured and I learned too much.

    I learned of nuclear weapons, war, prejudice, starvation and abused children.
    I learned of lies, unhappy marriages, suffering, illness, pain and death.
    I learned of a world where men left their families to go and fight for our country, and returned only to end up living on the streets... begging for their next meal.
    I learned of a world where children knew how to kill...and did.

    What happened to the time when we thought that everyone would live because we didn't grasp the concept of death?
    When we thought the worst thing in the world was if someone took the jump rope from you or picked you last for kickball?

    I want to be oblivious to the complexity of life and be overly excited by little things once again. I want to return to the days when reading was fun and music was clean. When television was used to report the news or for family entertainment and not to promote sex, violence and deceit.

    I remember being naive and thinking that everyone was happy because I was.
    I would walk on the beach and only think of the sand between my toes and the prettiest seashell I could find.
    I would spend my afternoon climbing trees and riding my bike.

    I didn't worry about time, bills or where I was going to find the money to fix my car.
    I used to wonder what I was going to do or be when I grew up, not worry about what I'll do if this doesn't work out.

    I want to live simple again.
    I don't want my day to consist of computer crashes, mountains of paperwork, depressing news, how to survive more days in the month than there is money in the bank, doctor bills, gossip, illness and loss of loved ones.
    I want to believe in the power of smiles, hugs, a kind word, truth, justice, peace, dreams, the imagination, mankind and making angels in the snow.

    I want to be 6 again.

    .haeger

    --
    You are not entitled to your opinion. You are entitled to your informed opinion. -- Harlan Ellison
    1. Re:Resignation. by Aadain2001 · · Score: 2, Funny
      *Sniff* Man, you rock. You totally rock!

      To being a kid again! /raises rootbeer float

      --
      Space for rent, inquire within
    2. Re:Resignation. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I want to think M&Ms are better than money, because you can eat them.

      Clearly you were unimaginative as a kid, and thus missed out on the special trip to the hospital.

      I want to go back to the time when green was a flavour.

    3. Re:Resignation. by dhalgren · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I want that too.

      Now I just have to find somebody to clothe, feed, and house me while I indulge myself.

    4. Re:Resignation. by Joebert · · Score: 3, Funny
      Clearly you were unimaginative as a kid, and thus missed out on the special trip to the hospital.

      Wow, you guys went to a hospital ?
      We went to a place called "Enterprise Village", but I was sick on the day everyone picked jobs, & got stuck working a dead end job as a cashier at Eckerd Drugs instead of the radio station like I wanted.

      Holy Shit ! I just realized that thoose special trips really do have an effect on the rest of your life !
      --
      Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
    5. Re:Resignation. by cybercobra · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If that goddamed phoney Holden Caufield was placed in today's world, I'm sure he'd have written a similar document.
      For Chrissake, it even mentions his desire to be a child again, like that phoney Michael Jackson.

      ========
      Ignorance is empty, meaningless bliss.

    6. Re:Resignation. by Chrax · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "I don't like what I've found, so rather than do what I can to change anything for the better, I'd rather revert to a state of ignorance and pretend there's nothing to fix."

      I find this to be a rather appalling abdication of responsibility. Which I suppose is the entire point.

    7. Re:Resignation. by Skroggtar · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Hmm. I don't quite agree.

      Being young, wee and full of vim is certainly a fun thing to be; of course our memories of the times are rosy and wondrous, etc. etc. But saying such glory cannot be found again, that innocence and purity and what-have-you are vital to true happiness is misguided and overly nostalgic. I'm sixteen years old, and despite the weight of earning the driver's license, getting a job, working on those grades, and the horrors of social contact in general, I'm twice (if not thrice!) as happy as I was when I was six. It's the feeling of moderate independence, the freedom to make absurd decisions that in no way affect the long term, the feeling of accomplishment at just about everything you do (well at least all the stuff you like), and (especially) the quasi-distorted, palpable, truly scrumptious view of the future.

      I know that eventually I'll have to trade it in for some less-than-stellar job and a smelly home with a wife I quickly tire of, but in the meantime, life is as delicious as a ham salad, and just as savory.

      In other words, I'm more correct than you.

    8. Re:Resignation. by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I just want to say I hate shit like this.

      This chain-letter bullshit is all the same. On some ultra-shallow level it seems great, and sentimental, but with 3 seconds of thought and usually two sentences in it becomes obvious what trite crap it is. Whether it's wanting to be 6, or learning everything you need to know from your dog, or whatever other BS that gets mailed around it all sounds like it was written by the same person on a Robotussin binge. Just awful stuff, horribly written and with no intellectual value whatsoever.

      On a less general note, if you want to be 6 again, fuck off and go be 6. Work in a factory, it's got about the same level of responsibility. It doesn't sound like somebody whistfully remembering childhood, it sounds like a man-child that doesn't want to contribute to society because it's hard.

      Now, before you ask who pissed in my Fruit Loops, nobody did. I have a sense of humor, and am usually a pretty carefree guy. This type of "humor" just manages to push almost every last button I have. The only way it could get worse is if some sadist let George Carlin have a whack at it, with lots of Jeff Foxworthy-worthy lists, some booger-eating references, and "fuck" every 4th word to make it sound adult. When are people going to realize that guy's a hack?

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    9. Re:Resignation. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      True story....

      My girlfriend dumped me. My cat died. I realized I have more white hair than otherwise. (What's left of it, that is.)

      So, I traded my Video Conferencing Project Manager job for a job as a English Teacher for 4-10 year olds in a different country.

      Now...
      -I live "colors".
      -I give encouraging words relentlessly, and I receive hugs in turn.
      -I bark like a d-o-g, Dog. I meow like a c-a-t, cat. I roar like a l-i-o-n, lion.
      -I play kickball. (And tag, and hacky-sacky, and hide-n-seek.)
      -I run just to run.
      -I sing songs just because.
      -I throw waterballoons. (Female teachers in wet T-shirts. Ulterior motive.)
      -I don't pay rent. (My employers do that.)
      -I walk 10 minutes to work.
      -I went for a 6 hour bike ride today because I had nothing else that I "HAD" to do.

      Call me immature if you want, but I like it.

      It's not all wine and roses.
      -I've had 5 family and friends die this calendar year.
      -All the bad stuff that always has been, still is.

      But, thanks to 300 or so little kids, I don't worry about that.

      On a daily basis, all I worry about is:
      -ABCDE...XYZ
      -Smile (Not me, them.)
      -And, most of all, encouraging the belief that, Everything IS possible.

      -----

      Btw... Here's a good song you can use to help teach your youngsters about colors....

      Red and yellow
      Red and yellow
      Black, Green, Blue
      Black, Green, Blue
      Sing a song together
      Sing a song together
      Me and you
      Me and you

      (Make sure you point at the colors while singing, and gesture appropriately during "Me and you")

    10. Re:Resignation. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      it sounds like a man-child that doesn't want to contribute to society because it's hard

      Most insightful part of the post.

      This chain-letter bullshit is all the same. On some ultra-shallow level it seems great, and sentimental, but with 3 seconds of thought and usually two sentences in it becomes obvious what trite crap it is. Whether it's wanting to be 6, or learning everything you need to know from your dog, or whatever other BS that gets mailed around it all sounds like it was written by the same person on a Robotussin binge. Just awful stuff, horribly written and with no intellectual value whatsoever.

      My gripe lies here. Sure it's great to pass judgement, tell people to get over it (or themselves), but why the sourness? What's wrong with the carefree attitude? I see the jelousy behind the reasoning. As you said, you're a pretty laid back kind of guy, but somehow this pushes your buttons. It pushes the buttons of everyone who has worked hard to get where they are. They have worked hard by the mantra that power (through money, friends, charity, activism, etc) will make you happy. It usually will, but there are other ways.

      Immaturity is another way. You could call it hiding from the world, or laziness, but it is another valid way. The real argument against it (which you failed to highlight amongst all the whinging in your post) is that it ill-prepares you for the world, that when you wake up to yourself, it will be harder to survive. I disagree. It ill-prepares you for your world. Any change in lifestyle is hard, and the same applies to the transition between living a mature lifestyle and leading an immature lifestyle.

      An immature adult has the luxury of being oblivious, of enjoying simple pleasures. Sure they accumulate very little, but who cares? I don't. They take nothing from me. They don't. It takes very little to keep them happy when they enjoy such common, simple pleasures. You do, which is a shame, since you have nothing to lose, and it does them no charity. People with your attitude are spoiling their dream, not helping their future.

      That said, the post above was a little trite.
    11. Re:Resignation. by Starcub · · Score: 3, Insightful

      A hack: 2 bit, second rate, a cheap immitation. The guy started his post with profanities, then critisized George Carlin, not for being an emotionally immature liberal, but for being a hack at it. Usually when people start using profane language I read what they have to say and promptly ignore them. It's usually good that I ignore them because that kind of behavior signifies that a persons intellect is being stunted by anger issues. However, it struck me as ironic that slashbot moderators thought his post was insightful when in fact he was exemplifying precisely the type of immature behavior they condemned adults for. That's a very effective 'anti-moderation' system me thinks.

    12. Re:Resignation. by JohnFluxx · · Score: 2, Insightful

      People complain about the "real world", but many studies have shown that from 14 to 18 or so is the most stressful time of you life. When you have a job, you can separate the job and home. You can't do that when you're studying for exams.

    13. Re:Resignation. by MooseByte · · Score: 4, Funny
      "Now I just have to find somebody to clothe, feed, and house me while I indulge myself."


      I'm sorry, my ex-wife already has that position filled.

    14. Re:Resignation. by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Gentle Reader,

      As a fellow curmudgeon, I have to say that you're not doing it properly. You have to do something to hide it, or you won't get invited to peoples' birthday parties. When you attempt to paint yourself as "a carefree guy with a sense of humor," don't follow it up immediately with the humorless excoriation of a popular comedian. That undermines your message and makes your curmugeonosity obvious. Instead, try following it up by complimenting some piece of popular culture.

      WRONG: I have a sense of humor, and am usually a pretty carefree guy. Jeff Foxworthy is stupid, and is betraying his fellow southerners to make money.

      RIGHT: I have a sense of humor, and am usually a pretty carefree guy. For example, this morning's Family Circus had me chuckling all day. Billy wandered the entire neighborhood looking for a spatula. Why did he expect to find one down by the river? Nobody knows.

      In the case of the WRONG example, people see that you've become so adept in your curmudgeoning that you can't even think on the subject of humor without going on a rant about the parts that piss you off. In the RIGHT example, you are shown to share your audience's taste for shallow, hackneyed popular culture. This will get you invited to social gatherings.

      If, on the other hand, you're like me and have embraced your inner misanthrope, then there is no reason to describe yourself as either funny or carefree in the first place. I find it to be a refreshing way to live.

      I'm AOC, and I hate pretty much everything! C'mon, now you give it a try. It will be like a weight lifted off your shoulders.

      --

      You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

    15. Re:Resignation. by maxpublic · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I want to live a life again where going to McDonald's was the rarest of treats, and having enough food to eat every day until the next paycheck my parents brought in was an exception, not the rule.

      I want to go back to a time when I wasn't allowed to make my own decisions, or spend my time in the fashion that pleases me most. Back to a time when just about everyone else in the world had the authority to tell me "no", sometimes for good reasons, sometimes simply because they knew I couldn't fight back.

      I want to go back to a time when an angry mother would haul off and beat me with a rolling pin, or force open my mouth and pour a bottle of tabasco down it, all in the name of "discipline".

      I want to go back to a time when children would sometimes torture each other for no particular reason, engaging in childish evil simply for the sake of being evil, while adults shrugged it off as "kids will be kids". Back to a time when adults naively told each other that it's impossible for children, those little darlings, to be cruel, vicious monsters.

      I want to go back to being at the mercy of a drunken father who spent so much of his paycheck on booze that there often wasn't enough left to cover the bills, much less buy basic necessities. And with that the constant screaming fights between parents who couldn't stand one another, yet didn't know what else to do except try to live with one another.

      I want to go back to a time when religion was rammed down my throat, and any attempt to repudiate the house gods ended up with a furious parent shoving a bar of soap into my mouth to "wash it out".

      I want to return to a time of never knowing whether a parent would actually come home that day, especially after one of the regular marital blowouts, and being afraid that they'd never come back - or sometimes, that they would.

      Yep, I want a return to fear and misery and despair, to destitution and hunger, to hopelessness. I want to return to a time when I had no control whatsoever over anything at all in my world, and when others did whatever the hell they felt like to me because I was too small to fight back. I want to return to the world where every day I prayed I'd grow up just a little bit faster, so that I could become an adult that much quicker and get far, far away from my own personal and very real hell.

      Sometimes, people forget that the happy middle-class childhood envisioned in Hallmark-style e-chainletters was something enjoyed by only a tiny minority of people on the planet. The rest of us weren't quite so lucky.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    16. Re:Resignation. by Associate · · Score: 2, Funny

      Maybe he had a lisp.

      --
      Someone hates these cans.
    17. Re:Resignation. by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If profanity turns you off that strongly, maybe you've got your own issues. The moderation wasn't ironic, you're just unable to deal with strong language. I stand by every curse in my previous post. That chain-letter is bullshit. I think bullshit is a pretty succinct word that puts the general idea in people's head with a minimum of effort. As for the "fuck off", I absolutely stand by that, I'm sick of these people having responsibility, shirking it, and it's left to me to pick up the pieces.

      As for anti-moderation, your insightful mod is baffling me. I suppose it's for your assertion that profanity is a sign of anger "issues" but the main point of your post, that I was being immature, is completely unanswered. I fail to see how "no, you're immature" is insightful, and invite you to provide the insight that you've already been modded up for.

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    18. Re:Resignation. by NewbieProgrammerMan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Insightful? Cutesy-kind-of-funny, maybe, but not insightful. Sorry to be a cynical adult, but there are many 6-year-olds in this world who have real problems that make their life hell. They have adults or older children in their lives that beat them or abuse them sexually, or they don't have enough to eat, or there's a war going on around them.

      This sentiment of, "I want to be 6 again," only makes sense if you were fortunate enough to grow up with a good family in a decent place. Some people would rather die than go back to their childhood. While I'm at it, the laundry list of "adult problems" above is pretty fucking weak too. If mountains of paperwork and gossip are among your biggest problems, then your life isn't all that bad.

      Seems to me that this chain letter^H^H^H^H^H^H^post is the sort of thing one would expect to hear from an immature adult that thinks the world owes them a cushy life.

      --
      [b.belong('us') for b in bases if b.owner() == 'you']
    19. Re:Resignation. by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 2, Funny
      Being young, wee and full of vim is certainly a fun thing to be...

      Excuse me? I thought the phrase would be "full of emacs...".

      --
      That is all.
  4. Laugh or Cry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Maybe it's because as the world turns increasingly to s h i t, people develop a imaturity complex derived from the "laugh" half of the proverbial "laugh or cry" syndrome.

    1. Re:Laugh or Cry by cp.tar · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There is a reason why most stand-up comedians are people with a hard personal history.

      Humour, cynicsm, sarcasm... all defence mechanisms.

      --
      Ignore this signature. By order.
  5. Does this surprise anybody? by agent+dero · · Score: 4, Insightful

    With the focus in the past few decades on feelings, emotions, and our complete obsession with "our inner child." It's not surprising at all, it's been a while since we cared about some responsibility.

    There's a reason people are suing everybody, there's a reason tobacco companies have been losing so much money in courts; we're like a cuontry of 8 year olds, always pointing at somebody else in the back of class that through the paper airplane.

    That said, I think we're going to see a turn around with the generation in college right now, less divorces, less stupidity because it seems that more and more young people are sick and tied of the bullshit.

    --
    Error 407 - No creative sig found
    1. Re:Does this surprise anybody? by toroidal · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There's a reason people are suing everybody, there's a reason tobacco companies have been losing so much money in courts; we're like a cuontry of 8 year olds, always pointing at somebody else in the back of class that through the paper airplane. I'm also sick and tired of the ol' nanny state. I'm afraid that the next generation will be the same way becuase some might think that this type of behavior is acceptable.

    2. Re:Does this surprise anybody? by node+3 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      There's a reason people are suing everybody
      What, exactly, is wrong with suing someone? It's a legitimate and often necessary thing to do. There is no "plague" of lawsuits, the way you are trying to present it.

      there's a reason tobacco companies have been losing so much money in courts
      Yes, they are deliberately killing people. Or put more accurately, but lengthily, they knowingly lied about the medical risks and addictive qualities of cigarettes, portrayed them in advertisements as cool, including marketing that was deliberately designed to appeal to children, and, as if all that wasn't bad enough, they knowingly added ingredients which are very toxic and purposefully formulated cigarettes that are even more addicting than they naturally were!

      That said, I think we're going to see a turn around with the generation in college right now, less divorces, less stupidity
      Not gonna happen. The reason is that your lament is millennia old. Seriously. There are writings from ancient Greece and Rome that read exactly like the cranky old man of today, who decries the awful state of the youth "these days". If you want the divorce rate to go down, the number one thing you can do is to make it so that the middle class is strong and vibrant, and that people have great financial security and physical health. If you, on the other hand, make it so that both members of the married couple have to work long and hard just to scrape by, how can you possibly be surprised that the stress of daily life will have a detrimental toll on their marriage?

      because it seems that more and more young people are sick and tied of the bullshit.
      Wishful thinking made by someone who clearly hasn't turned on a television in the last 20 years. Just as it had always been, youth culture will reject the rigid demands of old coots like yourself. Just like always, there will be a segment of the youth who will be very responsible and upstanding. And just like always, life will go on and a whole new cadre of old coots will spout the same old nonsense about how the "youth of today" are worse than ever, just as it has always been for thousands of years.
    3. Re:Does this surprise anybody? by highonlife · · Score: 5, Funny

      always pointing at somebody else in the back of class that through the paper airplane.


      Did it happen during english class when they were teaching the word "throw"?
    4. Re:Does this surprise anybody? by Bloke+down+the+pub · · Score: 5, Funny
      we're like a cuontry of 8 year olds, always pointing at somebody else in the back of class that through the paper airplane.
      Eight year olds can spell "country" and "threw". Now write both of them 100 times, or I'll keep you in at recess.
      --
      It's true I tell you, feller at work's next door neighbour read it in the paper.
    5. Re:Does this surprise anybody? by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There's a difference between "I know this piece of fried chicken is bad for me" and "wow - this piece of fried chicken was prepared with rat poison because Fried Chicken Inc's research showed that rat poison would make me crave it more".

    6. Re:Does this surprise anybody? by killjoe · · Score: 4, Insightful

      All tort reform will accomlish will be the ability of corporations and the govt to kill people without paying the consequences.

      I would be in favor of tort reform if the monetary damages were limited but if found guilty the doctor or the CEO went to jail. You know hold people personally responsible for their actions and decisions.

      It will never happen of course. They will limit the monetary damages and also make themselves immune from any other punishment too.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    7. Re:Does this surprise anybody? by SpiritGod21 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I've read those Greco-Roman documents... but the problem is that they say the youth is horrible, and the post you're replying to says that the youth is good and that they're going to turn things around and make it better.

      In my experience, the reason both parents have to work so hard and scrabble is usually because they are financially irresponsible. My boss and his wife barely make it by each month, not because they don't get paid enough, but because they have almost $30,000 in credit card debt, on top of a mortgage, car payment, etc. I can't speak for the rest of college students, but examples like him and like my father were enough to make me tired of the bullshit, like the above poster wrote, and I'm going to do my best to be financially responsible to the extent that I can live comfortably on the same thing other people barely get by on.

    8. Re:Does this surprise anybody? by Oligonicella · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "There's a difference between..."

      Of course there is. That's because you constructed a straw argument. A known, unhealthy habit which contains known addictive poisons was compared to a normally healthy food doped with poison.

    9. Re:Does this surprise anybody? by Kohath · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What, exactly, is wrong with suing someone? It's a legitimate and often necessary thing to do.

      Good question.

      What's wrong with killing someone? It's often a necessary thing to do. Opinions differ on whether it's legitimate.

      What's wrong with just beating someone up instead of killing them or suing them? What's wrong with just taking what you want instead of hiring a lawyer to do it for you?

      Those other things are illegal, which means that a bunch of guys got together and decided to substitute their authority for yours. But illegal is not the same as wrong. Ask Anne Frank if you're confused on the difference.

      What's wrong with suing someone? When you sue someone, you are attempting to take something from them, by force, against their will. That's inherently wrong. It has been decided that it be allowed in this special circumstance, with many special protections placed on the process. Those special protections have been eroded (by lawyers and politicians, for profit) to the point where they are inadequate.

      The process is a lot more like stealing or extortion or kidnapping for ransom than it used to be. With the current rules, it's simply unjust. That's what's wrong.

  6. Not sure about this guy's definitions by Bombula · · Score: 4, Interesting
    "immature ... in the sense of being unpredictable, unbalanced in priorities, and tending to overreact."

    I'm not sure if that's the world's best definition of immaturity, since its corollary would suggest that maturity is defind by predictability, having balance of priorities (what does that mean?), and not overreacting (does that mean reacting appropriately - how do you define appropriate?).

    I hate to reduce things to an argument over definitions, but this stuff seems a little fruity to me. I think a simpler definition of maturity is a willingness to accept responsibility for oneself and for others. By that definition, then we definitely do see a lot of immature, i.e.: irresponsible, behavior among adults - probably because irresponsibility no longer gets you eaten by lions and tigers and bears the way it did for our hunter-gatherer ancestors.

    But this guy is definitely right about the value of maintaining mental elasticity as an adult. My grandfather is a good example. He was a prof at a big university and has always had an amazingly agile and adaptive mind. And today I got an email from him of some pictures he took on his digital camera that he doctored in photoshop. Th guy is 86 years old. Email went mainstream when he was in his late 70s, for God's sake.

    --
    A-Bomb
    1. Re:Not sure about this guy's definitions by MayonakaHa · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Reminds me of some of the customers I get at work. Usually older gentlement trying to get a handle on computers who don't have quite the mental flexibility of others saying they were "born too early".

      The funny part about that is the last customer who said that was talking to our Toshiba representative who's got a pretty good grip on current tech. When the rep asked when he was born in response and got something back that was around the 50's, the rep replied by saying he was born in the 20's. Just shows you that if you keep your mind fresh instead of just letting it sit there unchallenged you don't have to be left behind.

    2. Re:Not sure about this guy's definitions by Bloke+down+the+pub · · Score: 5, Funny
      I don't see any reason one can't keep a child-like mind while still being financially responsible and dependable.
      Greetings! My daddy used to be the nigerain minizter for candies and in my house I have a very enourmus jar of sweets. Unfortunatly this jar is guarded by my big brother, but if you give me ten bucks I will bribe him to open it for me ... er us and I will share them with you.
      --
      It's true I tell you, feller at work's next door neighbour read it in the paper.
    3. Re:Not sure about this guy's definitions by Spikeles · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I hate to reduce things to an argument over definitions, but this stuff seems a little fruity to me. I think a simpler definition of maturity is a willingness to accept responsibility for oneself and for others. By that definition, then we definitely do see a lot of immature, i.e.: irresponsible, behavior among adults - probably because irresponsibility no longer gets you eaten by lions and tigers and bears the way it did for our hunter-gatherer ancestors.
      This links back to post #15599659("What, exactly, is wrong with suing someone? It's a legitimate and often necessary thing to do. There is no "plague" of lawsuits, the way you are trying to present it." http://science.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=189448 &cid=15599659), this is the reason everybody is sueing everybody, because they don't take responsibility for their own actions.

      "Oh no.. i dived off the edge of bridge and cracked my head open because i didn't check first for things in the water.. it's not my fault somebody didn't put a sign up, it's the councils fault! Yeah.. let's sue them!"

      Or in politics where the politician is NEVER at fault, it is always someone else.
      --
      I don't need to test my programs.. I have an error correcting modem.
  7. It's all about definitions by Silver+Sloth · · Score: 4, Insightful
    From TFA

    A "child-like flexibility of attitudes, behaviors and knowledge" is probably adaptive to the increased instability of the modern world, Charlton believes. Formal education now extends well past physical maturity, leaving students with minds that are, he said, "unfinished."

    and

    "By contrast, many modern adults fail to attain this maturity, and such failure is common and indeed characteristic of highly educated and, on the whole, effective and socially valuable people," he said.

    So it looks like his definition of 'maturity' coresponds to my 'boring old fart', which, at the age of 53, I hope I'm not.

    --
    init 11 - for when you need that edge.
    1. Re:It's all about definitions by alas_anon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      >> Sorry but I really can't let that pass. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/maturity
      >> has the definition The state or quality of being fully grown or developed.

      The author is not writing for pop-psychology, this is a scientific argument. The definition you have from the popular dictionary is of physical maturity, not of psychological maturity from a scientific, biological, evolutionary viewpoint. In the field of biology, maturity is when the animal has acquired enough Stimulus --> Response reactions to make quick decisions. These S-->Rs become hardcoded into the brain and become knee-jerk reactions. They have evolved for purposes of survival. The adult must often make quick decisions to survive. This age-related hardwiring of the brain has been proven many times and in many ways in brain research. It's a bio-chemical thing that is difficult to reverse.

      I'm right close to fifty, also. You can't let pride get in the way of science, though. The things I'm discussing are just part of who we are, like it or not. Adults are rigid thinkers and immaturity implies creativity of S-->R patterning. Maybe knowing this is true can help older people listen more to the ideas of young people.

      I'm presently a teacher (college) and I repetitively spit out my knowledge to my students. Every now and then a bold student asks why something is the way it is. My knee-jerk reaction to say it is just that way and accept it. That's my old age talking. I find that as I get older it becomes more painful to even consider new solutions to old problems. I have learned to listen to the student's questions and go back to rethink why things are the way they are. It has been very educational. I have to tell myself that it is successful to rethink these things because I know maturity has made me mentally blind to new ideas. I can overcome that if I try.

      Most all of the posts on this thread are way off track and people don't realize this author is writing a paper on the topics of psychology, evolution, and biology from a scientific standpoint. The ridge thinking of the mature mind is not a new theory, it is old, well accepted, and proven. The author is discussing what happens when the mature adult can't solidify a S-->R rule set because the environment will not allow it. What is the outcome on development of the individual's psychology? Will the necessity to create new S-->Rs through a lifespan require the individual to remain in a psychologically immature state? Probably so. How will this change society?

      Freud also mentioned, in his lectures, that people in creative fields seem to be in a mentally juvenile state well into adulthood. This is not a new concept.

  8. youth culture killed my dog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Slashdot posters especially tend to overstate the value of youthful flexibility and forget what evil little pricks children often are.

    Part of maturing is learning to handle the fact that you are part of the world and that you don't always get what you want. Adult temper tantrums are increasingly viewed as the way to get things done, a vicious and childish response to being balked is hailed as being "forceful" and "practical".

  9. It's a symptom of the cause, by centipetalforce · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...not the cause of the symptom. I hear jokes that sound ridiculous when heard from third person all the time that I might laugh at if told to me. But stupid jokes don't cause immaturity, nor vice versa necessarily. It does all depend on the taste and context though, as some third grad jokes are as good as ever if done in the right context and aren't done in a derisive or tasteless sense.

    But the real cause of bad jokes is that people are as desperate as ever to be well liked. I blame that on the growing culture of sexual presumptiveness in our society. You can't just go up to a stranger and start conversing with them usually without her/him thinking your up to something, no matter how natural you are (unless you have a reason to be talking). People in general are paranoid, presumptive, and take themselves too seriously. They have nightmare stories in the back of their minds from 'Unsolved Mysteries' that tell them never to talk to strangers because they will rape and kill you!

    At least, that's the way people are in my town. I dunno about yours.

    1. Re:It's a symptom of the cause, by budword · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Depends on your town. Funny story, in the little town I grew up in, 10,000 people or so, guy gets into his hotel, hits the mini bar quick, and is a little tipsy when he goes out to hit the bar and meet up with his buddy. At the bar, everyone he ran into said "Hello" or "Hi". For no reason at all. Freaked him out. Didn't help he was already drunk. He's starting to get scared. Where he's from strangers don't even look at each other. So he leaves the bar. Every stranger he walks past on the street not only doesn't ignore him, but looks him in the eyes and says hello. He gets even more freaked out, feels like he's in an episode of the twilight zone. RUNS back to the hotel, where his buddy finds him crying, thinking he lost his mind.

  10. Personal position by heinousjay · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I can only speak for myself.

    I reject the traditional concepts of maturity. I refuse to spend my life doing things I don't like because of some outmoded notion of 'have to.' The pressure to grow up, to think like an adult, is ridiculous and useless from an objective standpoint.

    This doesn't mean shirking responsibility is part of the mindset. It simply means I try to retain a childlike viewpoint on the world. One of the most important things children have that most adults lack is a sense of wonder and discovery. The benefits are astonishing.

    That said, I didn't actually read the article, as it were, so I may be wildly off-topic. In true immature fashion, whatever.

    --
    Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
    1. Re:Personal position by arkaino · · Score: 2, Insightful
      One of the most important things children have that most adults lack is a sense of wonder and discovery. The benefits are astonishing.

      Well I think that's because of our daily life. Humans tend to follow different patterns which they think bring some kind of "order" to life, and those people who think in a really different way are usually treated as "freaks" by society.

      It's not due to human nature that adults lack sense of wonder, but a human behavior because he/she once learnt that thinking and acting in some particular way you can get better results.

      Now, it's really hard for me to define what "maturity" is after saying that. Isn't it just a learnt human behavior ?? and if it is, how can we judge people by that then ??

      cheers
    2. Re:Personal position by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 2, Funny
      ...a sense of wonder and discovery. The benefits are astonishing.That said, I didn't actually read the article

      So much for your sense of wonder and discovery.

  11. Responsibility by abdulwahid · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think part of the problem might be that people are not forced to grow up and take responsibility at such a young age as they were before. I am now living in Africa but comparing my experiences to when I was living in the West I see this every day. Many children here have to take serious responsibilities in life from a young age. Perhaps they have to look after whole families or simply go out and find food every day for themselves. Regardless, when speaking to some of the young people you find that they are relatively mature.

    Perhaps in the West people are too protected and hence don't need to grow up. Many people by the age of 18 have never gone to bed with hunger pains. They have probably never had a real job. They are probably given an allowance from their parents that they can go and waste on useless luxuries. The kids in the West are pampered and spoilt. No wonder there is a trend towards immaturity.

    --
    perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5, (41*2), sqrt(7056), (unpack(c,H)-2), oct(115), 10);'
    1. Re:Responsibility by Planesdragon · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think part of the problem might be that people are not forced to grow up and take responsibility at such a young age as they were before.

      Nope, sorry.

      The friends of mine who HAVE had to take responsibility at a young age, who HAVE gone to bed with hunger pains (and not out of choice) are far more immature and unable to take care of themselves than those of us who were children until the age of 18. Being introduced to hardship doesn't cause one to grow up faster -- it causes one to stop growing and start muddling through, even if they're not ready.

      If you look at the rate of war, murder, and general chaos, you'll find that those regions of the world where children are not allowed to mature before being forced to act like adults are far worse off than places like the west. While I won't argue that western children are "spoiled" far more often than their african counterparts -- I think I'd rather my children be spoiled than broken.

    2. Re:Responsibility by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The kids in the West are pampered and spoilt. No wonder there is a trend towards immaturity.

      I think you left out one of the most important factors - the government's use of hysteria about "protecting the children" to justify all kinds of nanny-state laws. We have this strange dichotomy enforced on us that people are helpless, naive babes in the woods until they reach 18 (and in some cases 21) years of age, which is completely geared to isolating them from any maturity-developing life experiences.

      I see it as the social sciences version of that recent study indicating that children raised in too clean of an environment end up with weakend immune systems because they've never been exposed to grit and grime of the real world and thus never had the opportunity for their immune systems to mature and build up sufficient biological defenses.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    3. Re:Responsibility by Bloke+down+the+pub · · Score: 2, Insightful
      you'll find that those regions of the world where children are not allowed to mature before being forced to act like adults are far worse off than places like the west.
      Correlation != causation.
      --
      It's true I tell you, feller at work's next door neighbour read it in the paper.
    4. Re:Responsibility by abdulwahid · · Score: 4, Interesting

      If you look at the rate of war, murder, and general chaos, you'll find that those regions of the world where children are not allowed to mature before being forced to act like adults are far worse off than places like the west. While I won't argue that western children are "spoiled" far more often than their african counterparts -- I think I'd rather my children be spoiled than broken.

      I don't think that is true - at least not universally. Where I am there is obious poverty and hardship wherever you look however the city is thousdands of times safer than most Western cities. Crime is very low here (virtually unheard of) and most of the crime that might happen is very small petty theft.

      It is of course true that hardship can lead to desperation and desperation could lead to violence. So if you point is Africa is more violent than Western Europe then that might be true. However, there are other factors involved rather than just poverty and hardship. However, I would hardly say the US is a non-violent nation it is just the type of fighting undertaken by the US is usually more distant. Long range missles rather than street to street. The visual impact is therefore different and people mistakenly think that dropping cruise missles is somehow more humane.

      However, my point is not directly about hardship but about responsibility. People here (in Africa) generally have to act responsible from a young age where socially they are required to look after themselves and their families from a younger age. In the West the children are generally spoilt and don't even have to look after themselves.

      Also, I am not saying that one way is better than the other. I think childhood is great time and it is a shame that many children here in Africa miss out on being children. I am just highlighting what might be a potential cause of the alleged increase in immaturity.

      --
      perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5, (41*2), sqrt(7056), (unpack(c,H)-2), oct(115), 10);'
    5. Re:Responsibility by Trifthen · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I think to a certain degree, that something like this happened to me. I grew up dirt poor, and worked diligently to absolutely pulverize school, finish a fully loaded IB curriculum, and get a college degree to escape that whole mess. I went to bed hungry, lived in trailers, moved a lot, and basically ran the house myself until I went to college.

      There's something about barely having a childhood that makes me want to be childish. I was 40 when I was 15, so I think I deserve the luxury of a few video games and a silly outlook now that I've made something of myself. I know what it's like to live a banal existence where laughs are forced or tied to shutting out everything looming menacingly ahead. I burned out at 18, and reached the conclusion that people take life too seriously; I made a vow to live and enjoy the little time I've been allotted. It's a cycle, really. I could spend the rest of my days resenting my past, be a bitter old fart ranting of rules and rigid discipline to reach success, but I know where that road leads.

      Responsibility? Sure, no question. Maturity to a fault? No. We have a rare opportunity to retain some of our childish antics in our old age, so why not enjoy it? Ever notice people generally calm down considerably once they are grandparents? They've experienced the utter maturity of raising children, they've tried the rules and regulations, punishments and experimentation. Grandma knows the deal now, she conspires with your children to undermine your authority, because she knows something you haven't quite learned: sometimes it's better to be "immature."

      But the parent poster had a major point: spoiled children aren't merely immature, they're sheltered and unprepared for maturity. It's a critical difference, and one the article misses. Without any other recourse, people continue with what they know and slowly realize it doesn't suffice when confronted with the inherent complexity of the adult world. Without a bailout, these people flounder horribly, and make immature decisions mostly through ignorance. They'll "grow up," but it'll take longer. Now we see where "helicopter parenting" truly leads.

      Not pretty, is it?

      By the way, some of those friends of yours who act immature? Talk to them sometime. That part of them which lived hard and grew up before their time is still there. Tell them to flip the switch and speak candidly, and they'll likely comply. If you ever want to see one of your funny or seemingly flippant friends suddenly become a wise old sage, it's a simultaneously terrible and awe-inspiring sight to behold.

      --
      Read: Rabbit Rue - Free serial nove
  12. A way to deal by demon_2k · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think that this is just a way for adults to deal with the stress of current day life. Or a side affect if you will.

  13. Who wants to be six again? by SuperKendall · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yes that's all very sentimental but why do you want to be six again, an age where from time to time you can sail a stick across a mud puddle but more often than not you are told you can't go near the mud muddle because you're wearing good clothes/at a wedding/supposed to stay dry? Who yearns for a time when everything is out of your control and sailing sticks across a pond is fun because you've still to undeveloped mentally to enjoy a good game of Risk?

    I prefer a world where I have greater control over my freedom, where my education is in my own hands as is my destinty. A world where I can paint watercolors any damn time I feel like no matter what I'm wearing and while I am aware of nuclear weapons I can also dismiss such vapid fears casually to enjoy a warm summer day.

    Being an adult is awesome if you just follow the golden words of Paul McCartney and let it be!

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Who wants to be six again? by etherelithic · · Score: 3, Interesting

      When you are 6 you are unburdened by the full weight of reality, and even though you may not have the intellect to enjoy a game of Risk, you don't care about that. You get enough from the simple things in life, and you didn't have to worry about anything. I fail to see the point you're making about being mentally undeveloped. So what if you're 6 and you can't enjoy a game of chess? If a 6 year old were to get the same enjoyment out of playing with sticks in a puddle as you do in playing Risk, who's to judge the 6 year old for being a simpleton? Whatever brings you happiness, is all that matters to you, no matter what anyone else says.

    2. Re:Who wants to be six again? by hyfe · · Score: 2, Funny
      Who yearns for a time when everything is out of your control and sailing sticks across a pond is fun because you've still to undeveloped mentally to enjoy a good game of Risk?

      If you enjoy Risk I'd say you're still undeveloped mentally.

      signed
      a Tabletop Gamer

      --
      "" How about taking the safety labels off everything, and let the stupidity-problem solve itself? """
  14. Academics, eh? by EnglishTim · · Score: 5, Interesting

    From the artice:

    The theory's creator is Bruce Charlton, a professor in the School of Biology at the University of Newcastle upon Tyne, England...
    "People such as academics, teachers, scientists and many other professionals are often strikingly immature outside of their strictly specialist competence..."


    I'm amused that he singles out academics, teachers and scientists - pretty much the exact description of people he has in his department. Not that I wish to suggest that the fine fellows at the University of Newcastle upon Tyne are in any way immature (I did my Bachelor's degree there), but I can't help thinking that his paper is by implication not exactly flattering to them.

  15. Kohlberg scale and selling/war? by AHuxley · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Having too many of the peasent moving up the Kohlberg scale is bad for
    profits, war and control?
    What if they start wanting and understanding ethical principles?
    Best keep them all at stage 2?
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kohlberg's_stages_of_ moral_development

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    1. Re:Kohlberg scale and selling/war? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There was several articles a few weeks ago about how public education in the USA was designed to keep people in a child-like state. In particular, keeping people from reaching stage 5 (where there are shades of grey and no one right way) seems to be important. It's much easier to control the populace if they see everything in black and white. Preventing the populace from maturing to the point where laws are social contracts... keeping them in a state where laws are absolute... must seem like utopia to certain politicians.

  16. Worldwide? by Bazman · · Score: 5, Funny

    Some people have commented that this is only happening in developed nations. But if it happens all over teh globe, would that make it a Peter Pan-demic?

  17. It depends by Vandil+X · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Before we got married, my wife and I decided to not have kids. Over the years since and to this day, when people ask us why we don't have any kids, we simply say "We're not done being kids, ourselves."

    And its true. We'd just rather spend all of that child-rearing money on ourselves and keep our options open (go out/take trips whenever), while not having to put up with the hassles of tending to kids.

    I'm sure many traditionally-raised folks might see this as immature or selfish, but it all depends on the point of view.

    --
    Up, Up, Down, Down, Left, Right, Left, Right, B, A, START
    1. Re:It depends by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think the "traditonally-raised" part these actually is the problem with the orignal article. It seems to hold the tranditonal way of doing things as the gold standard of maturity. As though if you were inflexable, but utterly reliably to do whatever mindless task you'd been trained to do that was "mature". That's no longer such an asset in society, and people are chinging. I think perhaps a better definition of maturity is the skills necessary to be a successful, productive, happy member of society.

      So something like: If you can't deal with society's rules, you aren't socially mature. If you can't succede in modern jobs you aren't intellectually mature. If you cannot find happiness in life you aren't emotionally mature. That kind of thing. That we don't defie it as some traditonal lifestyle to meet, but rather as having a good life in the world as it is today.

      Also an interesting thing about the childless it is it perhaps a new kind of maturity that we have to accept. There is a limit to the number of people we can have in the world, that's just a simple fact. It would seem we are already pushing that limit too far. Well, it will eventually solve itself via things like starvation, but I think a better idea might just be to procreate less. Given the number of people who decide that they want to have more than two children, it is socially repsonsible to have no children. That is, of course, not to advocate everyone goes childless, but there's something to be said for those that don't have kids.

      I just don't think that the definition of maturity as "Living your life like the last generation" is a useful one.

    2. Re:It depends by eyeye · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Unfortunately the dumber you are the more kids you have, all the dumb people I know have multiple kids, all the smart successful ones have none.

      If it was reversed then civilization would have been much further ahead by now.

      --
      Bush and Blair ate my sig!
    3. Re:It depends by LordLucless · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There is a limit to the number of people we can have in the world, that's just a simple fact. It would seem we are already pushing that limit too far.

      The world isn't over-populated. Some parts of the world are overpopulated. I believe Japan has recently been experiencing negative population growth, and Australia is predicted to in the near future. That is why, in Australia at least, they introduced new tax breaks for new parents - because, especially as people live longer past retirement, there are not going to be enough people to keep the country running to the same standard as it is now.

      Of course, compare that to countries like China, with its noted overpopulation problems, or India (not exactly sure on that one; India is heavily populated, not sure if it's overpopulated). It seems to me the countries that have large populations are generally those where it is beneficial for the family unit to have a large number of children (generally agricultural societies). In Western societies, having children is more a case of personal desire, rather than economic desirability. Therefore fewer people opt to have children, and those that do have fewer children.

      I don't think it's some sort of global population "invisible hand", I think it's simply people doing what they feel is best for them. The effect that may have on the local, national or global population is incidental, not the cause of the phenomenon.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    4. Re:It depends by abdulwahid · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Unfortunately the dumber you are the more kids you have, all the dumb people I know have multiple kids, all the smart successful ones have none.

      Surely it depends on your definition of success and not everyone works towards the same goals in life. If sucess is having a big house, international holidays and a fast car....then you might want to forget about the kids. However, for me success is having a happy family. I much prefer to spend days playing with my children than staying in some luxury resort. So in that way when I have children I am successful as I am achieving my goals.

      I have a friend who has 12 children in the UK. It seems extreme but I have never seen a family who are as happy, polite, well mannered and as educated. I don't think it is true that the dumber you are the more kids you have. The parents of these children are like walking encyclopedias and have knowledge of so many things in life. They are also generous and peaceful. I would say they have been successful in life. But the father drives a mini-bus rather than a sports car (he has to with 12 kids).

      --
      perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5, (41*2), sqrt(7056), (unpack(c,H)-2), oct(115), 10);'
    5. Re:It depends by mark99 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think thhe "too many people" argument is simply wrong. As technology advances, the world can easily support more and more people. The environment is far better off than it was when I was a child, although it has close to twice as many people, and is still improving. The problem in the future will be a lack of population, as our societies all strongly discourages children by putting those who have them at a tremendous economic disadvantage.

      I would guess that with careful use of new technologies (like genetic engineering) and moving some of industries off planet, earth could support something like 20 billion people. In fact it is unlikely to even see 9, and no one is sure where the population will level off once it starts shrinking.

      In fact as all of our economic systems have evolved to cope with growing and not falling populations, it is not clear that we can cope with decling populations at all. Look at the political paralysis about funding retirement shemes in Japan, Germany and the USA. We might see a very long worldwide depression once the big two pops (India and China) start to decline as well, but as most of the readers here will most likely be dead, I guess it doesn't matter much.

    6. Re:It depends by pla · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Surely it depends on your definition of success and not everyone works towards the same goals in life.

      Yes and no...

      Talking about "nontraditional" happy people - People who (could) make quite enough to compete favorably in the rat race but choose to only work 20 hours a weeks and live in a double-wide so they can afford frequent vacations. Those people validate your point, but come few and far between.

      Talking about the ever-growing masses of n'th generation welfare families, you have it absolutely wrong. When you need to live on the dole to survive, you should NOT have kids. But those people seem to have the most kides - Look at a cross section of the US in terms of income (or education) vs average number of children, and you have a VERY strong inverse correlation. The poor breed, the wealthy breed (but don't suffer for it or exist in large enough numbers to sway the above-mentioned correlation), the middle class have to choose between lifestyle and kids.


      I heard a story on NPR the other day, about TN cutting back on their socialized healthcare system. They portrayed this as a real sob story, a poor victimized crippled woman who had to choose only five prescription drugs per month to fill.

      Mind you, this woman already got $600/mo just for existing! For breathing and eating the government cheese, she gets paid. Then she gets five prescriptions per month... Not one or two, but five. They went on to tell a tale about how, when she got an infection, she had to pick which drug to temporarily live without. And of course, after rent and food and basic bills, she only had $9 out of her free $600 remaining per month.

      Do you know how many free prescriptions I get? ZERO! Do you know how much I have left each month from my government pay-me-to-exist check? ZERO, because I don't get one! And $600 wouldn't even pay all of my rent, because I don't qualify for section-8 vouchers. Can ya hear the goddamned violins? Can you???

      But back to the NPR story... The next generation no doubt did better, right? Her kids can help... Nope. Her kids also live as white trash, getting their own little slice of government cheese, and can't afford to help Mom because their own kids have huge regular medical bills (apparently also over the five-script limit? The story didn't make that part clear).

      This story absolutely infuriated me - This woman needs to take just one last prescription - for the lead pill; and her progeny need to stop spreading their legs until they can afford to feed themselves! End-of-fucking-story. I didn't just describe a situation of "differently happy" - I described a case of hereditary poverty largely through their own acceptance of that situation.

    7. Re:It depends by radtea · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm sure many traditionally-raised folks might see this as immature or selfish...

      And people who are not insane will see it as mature and responsible.

      People who do not want children should not have children.

      People who think everyone should have children, or that anyone has any kind of "duty" to have children, are childish and immature. They can't separate their own desires from those of others, and they don't understand that it is the basest kind of evil to create a human being who is not fundamentally wanted and loved, but rather considered a burden or a duty.

      We live in a society that doesn't particularly value children, and I frequently see parents who view their kids as a burden. If you listen to the "back-to-school" ads at the end of summer you will see how anti-child we are, and how wide-spread the assumption is that everyone is really looking forward to shipping their kids back to the warehouse. As a parent who actually likes children, I hate the end of summer as much as they do. And yes, I do work for a living--just in a way that gives me time to do what I really care about.

      If you don't like doing kid-stuff with kids, you shouldn't have kids. Anything else will just increase the unhappy population of the Earth, which is more than large enough already.

      --
      Blasphemy is a human right. Blasphemophobia kills.
  18. Their photo for illustration by simdan · · Score: 2, Funny

    They are using a photo of a traffic cop dancing in the street to illustrate their point. I could have sworn I've seen that cop on TV. He does these crazy moves and motions as he directs traffic. Pretty entertaining to see and a lot better then a cop with a chip on his shoulder. I have doubts that he is really all that immature. Just a guy having fun at his job.

  19. Responsibility is key by SuperKendall · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't think the immaturity discussion at hand has really anything to do with becoming one of the Sheeple and conforming to expected norms. I think it has everything to do with accepting responsibilities. That I think is a growing problem that people seem to be less responsible than in the past...

    I myself am happy to maintain a child like outlook on life but I also take responsibilities and commitments and relationships very seriously. Perhaps it is the erosion of serious relationships in society (and that could mean anything from partners to very close friends) that is tainting other aspects of life for some people.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  20. This is great! Now I can by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    feel perfectly comfortable telling people my own age to get the hell off my lawn!

  21. This topic is producing a lot of childish replies by Rik+Sweeney · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Ironically it's the ones that aren't intentional that we should be worrying about...

  22. Its Simple Really by artoffacts · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Adults are typically hard to sell to. Children on the other hand typically make easy marks. So how do you make sure that your target market remains in a blissful pre-lapsarian haze in the face of age and oncoming responsibility?

    You produce them as such.

    Thomas Doherty once quipped that "movies reflect teenage, not mass - and definitely not adult - tastes". Hollywood, The TV industry, glossy magazines, etc, are all interested in doing one thing: producing you as an unquestioning consumer whose core concerns are childlike.

    Take for example these new Nike Ronaldino ads whose catchphrase is "never grow up". I don't want to go all Barthes here but these ads are so shameless in their meaning production that you wonder how any adult with an IQ over 80 could fall for their message. It's pitiful really.

  23. The trouble is.... by WontStopTrying · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm 19. To politely state how I feel about my generation is that I strongly dislike them. What's worse though is having to deal with adults at my college, who attend to get a "second chance" at whatever it is they want. What's annoying about them is that they are immature. They act exactly like my generation. A group of people who are more focused on social aesthetics rather than concerning themselves with the overall good, they don't even focus on a goal besides graduating. It's annoying, and it probably won't stop. Education is being pushed on younger people to attend at an early age so they don't have to go back, or won't have to do a lot of work later in life while raising kids, and that might make it change because they'll be able to focus on adult responsibilties and socialize with people who are farther along in their life. As far as people in "the west" living in cushy little houses and having everything provided for them by their hardworking parents, that is untrue. My mom made me go get a job. My mom told me if I didn't save money that I would be the man who had to walk to work because he blew it on a game system instead of preparing for an accident from his car or saving for my retirement. Currently I'm renting my own house leased under my own name and sure I had her help finding it, but it's me and my roommates paying for it. She prepared me for it, but I am proof that "the west" doesn't have everything given to them and that some of my generation can appreciate deeper things than how many friends you have on myspace, or who got drunk at what party. Personally I find my generation offensive, but that's just me.

    1. Re:The trouble is.... by ComradeSnarky · · Score: 2, Funny

      My mom told me if I didn't save money that I would be the man who had to walk to work because he blew it on a game system instead of preparing for an accident from his car or saving for my retirement.


      Your game system costs as much as a car plus your whole nest egg? I didn't know the PS3 was out already.

  24. Are Farts Funnier in Church? by Quirk · · Score: 2, Interesting
    It's really impossible to address the range of issues such a claim covers. In evolutionary terms we're thought by many to be neotenic. From wikipedia: " There is controversy over whether adult humans exhibit certain neotenous features, or juvenile characteristics, that are not evidenced in other great ape species. Stephen Jay Gould was an advocate of the view that humans are a neotenous species of chimpanzee; the argument being that juvenile chimpanzees have an almost-identical bone structure to humans, and that the chimpanzee's ability to learn seems to be cut off upon reaching maturity."

    An argument could be made that as we're neotenic by evolutionary design it's "only natural" that psychologically we exhibit overextended developmental immaturity.

    Our sense of humour is based on broken symmetry. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience by Erving Goffman was an early effort to set out the myriad markers we use to establish a contextual frame and the wit we employ to break that frame for various reasons, humour not least among them.

    Our relatively oversized brain is conjectured to be an outgrowth of our intricate social relationships. Our fetishes and rituals have come under scrutiny by dint of recorded history and cultural cross fertilization. In the vein of familiarity breeds contempt it may be that we've simply come to more easily poke fun at ourselves.

    The Marx brothers said it best: Groucho:"I wouldn't want to join any club that would have me as a member"; and Karl: "Moi, je ne suis pas marxiste."

    It may be that those who are now seen as relatively immature are those whose lives most correspond with the material wealth that permited playful immaturity. I suggest that Freud's concept of polymorphous perversity can be extended from sexuallity to all aspects of our lives as a description of our ability to transcend our basic nature.

    --
    "Academicians are more likely to share each other's toothbrush than each other's nomenclature."
    Cohen
  25. bs by norteo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "a growing number of people are retaining the behaviors and attitudes associated with youth"

    Oh my God!!!! Adults don't think about money any more! what are we going to do?! Don't tell me wars will soon be over!! Quick, you, "leading expert on evolutionary psychiatry", give me some aderol!!!

  26. Explaination by Zemran · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Growing old is mandatory but growing up is optional... and I opted out.

    --
    I love stacking my barbecues in the shed at the end of summer - you can't beat a bit of grill on grill action.
    1. Re:Explaination by hey! · · Score: 5, Funny

      If you are sufficently self centered and poor/uninterested in reading social cues, you'll never realize that you are pathetic middle aged man sponging off his parents and frittering away all his time on their broadband connection.

      In a way if you are sufficiently far from realizing you are pathetic, it is indistinguishable from not being pathetic. It's like being so far away from being a normal human being that you approach a semblence of it, as it were, coming from the other direction.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    2. Re:Explaination by hey! · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And you sound too old... and maybe a little bitter. Is this a way of telling everyone that you wished you were a "sufficently self centered and ... are pathetic middle aged man sponging off his parents and frittering away all his time on their broadband connection"?

      Bitter?

      No. It only sounds that way because of the general paucity of irony in the world.

      I think of this as an optimistic viewpoint.

      What I'm saying is nobody is pathetic -- or at lest nobody needs to feel pathetic. And if you don't feel pathetic, then the contempt of others is a waste of time. It's the person who is disturbed by others who don't measure up to his values is closer being pathetic than the object of his scorn. If the only way you notice other people is to scorn them, then the person who doesn't notice other people at all is better off.

      The example I used was chosen to be the most conventionally contemptible one I could come up with. Apparently it hit some moderator a bit close to home.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    3. Re:Explaination by hey! · · Score: 4, Funny

      How _OLD_ are you exactly? Frittering?

      Well, depends on how you measure age:

      (1) Old enough to remember a 300 baud modem as an upgrade.

      (2) Old enough to have used TIPs to access the ArpaNet.

      (3) Old enough to remember bang notation on email addresses.

      (4) Old enough to remember V7 Unix and have worked on Multics.

      (5) Old enough to remmeber how sdb was big improvement on adb, but still using adb sometimes because it was easier to patch object code with it if you knew machine language.

      (6) Old enough to remmber CPU clock speeds measured in KHz.

      (7) Old enough to have worked on a system with a 5MB hard disk.

      (8) Old enough to have seen punched cards, drum memory and CRT memory in the flesh, albeit as surplus hulks in the basement and not working machines.

      (9) Old enough to have bootstrapped a computer via its front panel switches.

      (10) Old enough to remember when "core" memory was actually made out of cores -- magnetic beads.

      (11) Old enough that when I started in the business, I had older colleagues who would say things like, "I remember getting 4K of RAM on our 1401; we thought we had the world by the balls. That was a stored program jobbie, you know". Sometimes, as we sat around on the cracker barrels whittling new dot matrix print heads, a few would admit to being old enough to have worked on Whirlwind (which was programmbed by plug boards).

      (12) Old enough to have a five digit /. user id.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    4. Re:Explaination by turnipsatemybaby · · Score: 4, Funny

      Luxury!

      I had to catch a bird and press it's beak against a revolving stone slab!

  27. Old fart maturity? by Nicolay77 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I believe that being mature simply means to accept the consequences of our acts.

    Being mature doesn't have anything to do with being predictable, boring, let-me-read-my-diary old fart or being playful, childish, fun and sometimes impredictable and impulsive.

    As long as I accept the consequences of my acts let me play all I can and enjoy simple things and not worry more than I have to.

    --
    We are Turing O-Machines. The Oracle is out there.
  28. Burden is an illusion by SuperKendall · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When you are 6 you are unburdened by the full weight of reality

    What weight? Is there a physical cinder block upon you? Put it to the side then. All other weight, especially mental weight, is chosen by you. You are the one who decides if weight of your imagining is dragging you down or something to stand upon.

    The point I am making is that being much older I have had many more experiences and am able to enjoy them in ways a six-year old is not, as I can enjoy more esoteric pleasure just as much as splashing in a puddle (alluded to in the words of the musical Chess with "The Queens we use would not excite you"). My higher level of awareness also leads to greater ability to experience joy. While it is true that also means a greater ability to experience esoteric suffering, I would not give my far vaster scope of ability to simply feel more just because sometimes there is pain. There was pain when I was six as well so what would be the difference except that by opting to stay six forever I would wish myself to be enclosed in a box.

    Have you ever read Flowers For Algernon? There is a reason why that story is a sad tale instead of a joyous return to a blissful state of ignorance.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Burden is an illusion by Jerry+Smith · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Have you ever read Flowers For Algernon? There is a reason why that story is a sad tale instead of a joyous return to a blissful state of ignorance.

      Well Í have. It's sad BECAUSE two personalities (genius vs. retard, excusez les mots) are described, and none are preferable. The responsibillity of having to make choices, and be doomed to bear the consequences: thát's what it's about. Being cared for at six, play with sticks and mud-pools, enjoy life as it is without having to thing further than another day, perchance a week. When summer holidays lasted forever, chocolate was plain good, bikes could fly if you just tried hard enough and animals could speak. Have you ever read Calvin and Hobbes? Winnie the Poeh? 'His Dark Materials'?

      --
      All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain. Time to die.
    2. Re:Burden is an illusion by Bastian · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I haven't read His Dark Materials, but I have read the others.

      Calvin and Hobbes I don't take as a great example. Calvin is emotionally unstable, creates a lot of problems for those around him, and doesn't strike me as being particularly much happier than the other characters in the story. Hobbes makes an interesting foil; he's often used to underline the silliness of Calvin's destructive behavior. He's much more mature than Calvin, gets along with others better, and doesn't harbor nearly as much anger. Calvin may be the protagonist, but he's not the hero.

      Winnie the Pooh was written for children, so the characters are naturally going to be very childlike. However, I don't see a single life lesson that comes from Pooh which can't be applied in adult life - indeed, Pooh's easygoing attitude is something I see in adults far more often than in children. I don't have kids of my own, but at least in public I often marvel at how strongly they can fixate on small, inconsequential objects, which strikes me as just about the last thing Winnie-the-Pooh would ever do. I'd say that, of all the characters in the Pooh series, Pooh and Christopher Robin represent the attitudes and ways of thinking of children that I've met the least well. Far more often, they remind me of Rabbit or Tigger.

      Really, if I had to say anything about Pooh's character, I'd say that he represents the patience and equanimity that are the best qualities of well-mannered adults, and that he was made somewhat dim in an effort to counteract his otherwise overhwelming wisdom in an effort to keep the character entertaining, as well as to make it easier for children to relate to him.

    3. Re:Burden is an illusion by jaelle · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What bothers me here is the assumption that 'maturity' means giving up mental flexibility, energy, etc. The baseline assumption is wrong. You can do more with the data you acquire with experience, if you remain open to the data in the first place.

      Misery is a choice. It's *all* a choice. I fail to see anything at all wrong with retaining the good stuff of youth, coupled with the experience of age. Old men I know are always moaning "if I had the energy they have with what I know now.."

      --
      You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say will be misquoted, then used against you.
    4. Re:Burden is an illusion by Reziac · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And just because you're viewing the world from a mature perspective doesn't prevent nor negate the joy of playing in a mud puddle, if you feel the urge.

      I'm 51, and despite all my mature attitudes [g] I still swing around the corner pole EVERY time I go to the post office, and I don't care who sees me do it. I watch ants. I examine interesting pebbles. I dig in the dirt (okay, so we call it "gardening" -- but it's still fundamentally digging in the dirt).

      No smart remarks about my second childhood... :)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  29. Re:Haha by Majik+Sheff · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Adulthood is...
    Doing what you must do, before doing what you want to do.
    Doing the right thing, especially when no one will ever know.
    Knowing that your actions and words affect those near you.
    Realizing that like it or not, every word and deed has a consequence; often unforseen.
    Understanding implicitly that in spite of the previous two items, the world does not revolve around you.

    --
    Women are like electronics: you don't know how damaged they are until you try to turn them on.
  30. I remember being six... by S.P.B.Wylie · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And it wasn't the paradise you remember. Sure, someone stealing you jump rope was you biggest problem, but at the time you felt like it was the end of the world. You would often throw fits, yell, and generally colapse. Now we look back at that stuff and think how easy we had it, because we have grown up and can handle it.

    Instead of "wishing to be six," I want to learn to be a adult that thinks like a six-year-old. I want to be able to deal with problems in a responcible manner, but still understand the fun of silly hats. I want to understand that there are bad things in the world, but still meet the world with smiles and a it-will-work-out deminer. We have the misconception that we must be cyical adults just because we have reached a certain age. I'm going to be a kid forever!

    Oh, and remember, if you became 6 again, you would have your teenage years to look forward to *shudder*

    --
    I give bread to the poor, they call me a saint.
    I ask why the poor have no bread, they call me a communist.
  31. Oh I agree ( Was Re:Does this surprise anybody?) by kaiwai · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You hint it right on the noggen; the number of so-called adults who seem to have the maturity of a child seems to be an increasing phenomenon in our society; I just look down the road and on the news; the 'everyone elses fault except my own' syndrome. There are people on the benefit having children, knowing full well they don't have the funds to pay for the associated costs, we have couples having more children than they can afford, then demanding that the tax payer for the bill for their lifestyle choice.

    All this is actually a biproduct of our modern day welfare state, and the nanny state complex which people have adopted, that we shouldn't take responsibility for our actions, because good old nanny state will always be there to whipe out bottoms, and stop us from doing moronic things.

    Regarding smoking, the health issues have been known for over 60 years, if people CHOOSE to live under a rock, and REFUSE to take in the information that is readily out there, who is to blame? I don't blame the cigarette companies - they're like any other company, make their product look sexy, close over any possible health issues, and keep on pushing.

    If you're going to blame cigarette for the associated health costs of smoking, why not allow people to sue fast food companies who fail to put warning labels and advertise that if their product is consumed in excess, it could cause health problems? why not extend it to the confectionary and snake food companies? heck, why not put a big sticker on cars that warn that due to the bad driving of others, you could possibly die!

    Honestly, it is getting to the point where I ask, when are people going to take responsibility for their actions - that is the cornerstone of being an adult, making your choices and accepting the consequences of those choices.
  32. Re:Well I dunno man by abdulwahid · · Score: 2, Informative

    If what it takes to be "responsible" or "mature" is starvation, child labour, and so on then please, sign me up for immaturity. I would also point out that in that "mature" environment we have more crimes against humanity than, well, proably anywhere in the modern world. Ethnic clensing, tribal warfare, brutal torture, etc. Seems that perhaps having the weight of the world thrust on your shoulders as a kid and haivng to mature fast is perhaps not the best method for a stable and successful future.

    I think you are missing my point. It is not about the poverty but about the responsiblity. Socially here people have to be responsible from a young age but in the West they don't. Also, it is unfair to paint all of Africa with one brush. Africa is a massive place and has diverse cultures. To think that it is all "Ethnic clensing, tribal warfare and brutal tortue" shows a complete lack of understanding of what Africa is like. Sure these things do exist in Africa but not everywhere. They also exist in all other parts of the world. Some of the worst Ethnic cleansing the world has seen has been in Europe. Also horrific tortue is carried out in many parts of the world (including by the US) and is not something particular to Africa or even the norm. in Africa.

    The point though is taking responsiblity. Having to be responsible for yourself and other makes you more mature at a younger age. It might not always be a good thing but it is a factor.

    --
    perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5, (41*2), sqrt(7056), (unpack(c,H)-2), oct(115), 10);'
  33. Was this world made by "mature" people? by Cannelloni · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Did people used to be more responsible and "grown up" when they sent their sons into battle in Europe or Asia against the sons of some other "adults"?

    I don't claim to know what maturity means, exactly, but it seems to be the ability to care, love, to provide for others, and to not be impressed by propaganda och values created by somebody else, perhaps with a political or religious agenda.

    But what do I know? I'm not exactly a model person. I'm just happy I've made is this far. All I want is to do what I love and love what I do.

    --
    Beauty is in the beholder of the eye.
  34. Re:The fact that that was modded "insightful"... by Silas+Palmer-Cannon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The fact that that was modded insightful is proof of this phenomena. And also a little ironic.

  35. Maturity by Channing · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What is the formal definition of maturity ? I RTFA and didn't see one so its impossible to agree or disagree with it.

  36. I see two definitions by S.P.B.Wylie · · Score: 4, Insightful

    One definition is the idea that mature people "don't like silly things." I personally think these people need a pie in the face. Life is hard, life is stressful, and sometimes you just have to enjoy the silly and simple things.

    The other definition (and I feel the more relevant one) is the responsibility factor. I would say "accountability" works better than "responsibility," even though responsibility is how everyone is refuring to it. As for this, I feel it is definately true that people aren't accountable enough. People (in America at least) seem to be told to watch themselves, and people stop looking out for the guy next to them. We all affect each other, and we all need to be accountable for that. NO PERSON IS AN ISLAND.

    The trick is to take the best of both worlds. Enjoy a good pie fight, but have the courtecy to help clean up

    --
    I give bread to the poor, they call me a saint.
    I ask why the poor have no bread, they call me a communist.
  37. A poem for a poem by S.P.B.Wylie · · Score: 2

    Life never stays the same
    no matter how much we wish it would
    for time runs as a river does
    and though the pattern may repeat
    the drop cannot run the coarse again.

    So we do remember
    times that were good and fair
    as we ever on prepare
    for the day that now lies ahead.

    The past is the past
    and there is no point in living there.
    The future is before us
    more life to live and tales to tell.

    Self author-ed
    There is something to be said for the world of the 6-year-old, but there is something to be said for this world as well.

    --
    I give bread to the poor, they call me a saint.
    I ask why the poor have no bread, they call me a communist.
  38. mental maturity? by tofus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What the hell *is* 'mental maturity'? No really? Having an IQ of 150? Or an EQ of 240?

    I dare claim that whomever came up with the term 'mental maturity' was mentally immature enough to come up with a better term.

    I mean, a man/woman is physically 'mature' when all the reproductive organs have fully developed and the person is capable of human reproduction.

    Are you mentally mature when you start thinking about sex more then your gameboy? What?

    I say the entire term 'mental maturity' is popular marketing speak for 'total nonsense'...

  39. Re:What is wrong with being child-like by GoofyBoy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    >sometimes the 6-year-old has it right. "Why don't people just talk instead of having wars?"

    Have you've ever seen two 6 year olds fight over a useless toy both of them will forget in about 2 hours?

    Have you've ever seen a 6 year old go into extreme crying/temper tantrum mode causing fustration to their parents (you know, the ones who feed and love them) just because they can't get a small shiny colourful package of candy?

    Sometimes 6 year olds don't have it right.

    --
    The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
  40. People bashed you, but I won't... by hummassa · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I lived all my adult life -- hell, since my teens -- wanting the things you wrote.
    Now I have a 6yo boy and a 2mo girl. And I have it all again.
    Everytime he smiles because of his new YuGiOh card -- he made himself in a piece of A4 paper with his color pencils -- and everytime she smiles satified after feeding and everytime I hug both of them at night when it's cold and the three of us just cuddle watching the Simpsons or the Fairy Oddparents on TV, I forget about all the crap that is being an adult, and I am just there with the two people I love most in the world, completely happy.
    A couple of years ago, the boy asked me "Dad, why do the adult make all the decisions", and I answered: "life is not fair -- adults got to make all the decisions, and children got to have all the fun."

    --
    It's better to be the foot on the boot than the face on the pavement. ~~ tkx Kadin2048
  41. Re:Haha by Wildclaw · · Score: 2, Insightful

    And here is society's definition of Adulthood

    Doing what the boss above tells you and never question it.
    Accepting that everything that the boss/media tells you is the right thing.
    Knowing that your place in life is to earn as much money as possible by any means so you can spend it on shiny things.
    Realizing that anyone not confirming with these rules are evil or misguided.
    Understand implicitly that the world revolves around those that tell you what to do.

    Unfortunally, what I wrote is only half a joke. Too often maturity is seen as becoming a cog in society and do/think what others tell you.

  42. Indulgence? by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There is enough food in the world to feed every human on the planet, though hundreds of people starve to death every day.

    There would be enough shelter in the world too, if we only looked after what we had and built things to last.

    Practical clothes can be churned out by machines in a matter of seconds, if we set them up and tell them to do it, yet much of what is worn in the so-called first world is made by hand by people leaving in poverty conditions in less-developed countries.

    One can say similar things about medicine, education, the natural environment, and a host of other important issues.

    What's the common thread among all of these shortcomings? A lot of adults haven't grown up, and still suffer from greed, selfishness, and other negative emotions. With the resources and technology we have available to humanity today, we could provide for every human being on the planet, and we could all work only 20 hours a week.

    If you're an adult who has grown up, please consider what you can do to help. Make a small donation to a charity that supports someone less fortunate than you. Change something in your life to be a little more environmentally friendly. Volunteer a couple of hours of your time to a good cause. Have the courage to vote for a someone who stands for these values, even if they have no chance of getting elected (this time), and tell everyone why you voted that way.

    The more people grow up, take some personal responsibility for the state of the world, and do their small part in improving it, the better life will be, and there's really nothing indulgent about it.

    Or we could just say "Yeah, whatever" and make it someone else's problem. Not that that would be childish, or anything.

    --
    If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    1. Re:Indulgence? by drsquare · · Score: 4, Insightful
      With the resources and technology we have available to humanity today, we could provide for every human being on the planet, and we could all work only 20 hours a week.


      If everyone on the planet only worked 20 hours a week, and relied on technology and handouts for food and clothing, there would be no technology, no clothes and no food.
    2. Re:Indulgence? by rtaylor · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If everyone on the planet only worked 20 hours a week, and relied on technology and handouts for food and clothing, there would be no technology, no clothes and no food.

      What makes you think that? It is pretty easy to demonstrate that a large portion of North Americans do that now. The other 20+ hours per week is usually sunk into entertainment and comfort rather than necessities.

      --
      Rod Taylor
    3. Re:Indulgence? by WhiplashII · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What's the common thread among all of these shortcomings?

      I think about this a lot - the common thread is politics. Politicians (warlords, whatever) deciding that they are more important then the people they control. When you give to a charity, what percentage of the money/help makes it to the people that need it? In some countries, it is close to zero - and in most countries with serious problems the charity money ends up buying weapons for the warlords, making the problem worse (see food for oil, the African relief efforts, etc.). The best thing to give to right now seems to be people that go there themselves - doctors without borders, etc. (I also donate a large portion of my income to charities).

      The sad thing is that what these people really need is an invasion - remove the dictators, put it "good" people. The catch 22 is that the kind of people that would invade/revolt are not the kind of people that you want running the country! Even democratic republics (though typically better than other alternatives) do not work reliably - see Iran where the elected people are hate mongers, see Argentina where the elected government took the american continent's second best economy and destroyed it in 5 years through handouts, etc.

      There doesn't seem to be a perfect solution - I don't think we really even understand why the US has been so successful. Other countries have more resources, more land, more people, more freedom, less corruption, etc - but none of those countries can match the US technologically or economically.

      Why isn't politics run as a real science? Let's stop treating the most important aspect of modern life as an emtional game, and start doing double blind studies and experiments to figure this out. Want to really end world hunger? Become a true political scientist!

      --
      while (sig==sig) sig=!sig;
    4. Re:Indulgence? by lawpoop · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "If everyone on the planet only worked 20 hours a week, and relied on technology and handouts for food and clothing, there would be no technology, no clothes and no food.

      There was a time where most people worked 80 hours a week farming, and relied on a non-market system for distribution of goods.

      Somehow we go to a point where we could work 40 hours a week and live much better than surfs ever did, and still progress at a much faster rate. There is no reason, with constantly improving technology, that we shoulnd't be able to get away witth working even less.

      The trick is to make sure that a decent portion of the profit goes to the producers, instead of fuedal lords or CEOs.

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
    5. Re:Indulgence? by Aceticon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If everyone on the planet only worked 20 hours a week, and relied on technology and handouts for food and clothing, there would be no technology, no clothes and no food.

      Is that brand new 35 inch plasma TV really worth working 60h/weeks?

      Does buying a first generation Blu-Ray burner really compensates for commuting 2h/day every day?

      Does getting a SUV instead of cheaper car really compensates for not going on vacations for 3 months to a paradisian island?

      Buying stuff is a means to and end.
      Working is a means to an end.

      Here's a sugestion - everytime you want to buy something, ask yourself the following:
      • Do i need this?
      • If so (for example toothpaste), do i get anything for it to be an expensive branded product or is a white brand version good enough?
      • If not (35'' plasma TV), will the pleasure i get from it be worth the hours i have to work in order to earn the money to pay for it?

      In my experience most people could work 2/3 or even 1/2 as many hours as they do now and still have the same level of living that that have now ...... if they didn't waste so much money in things that aren't really that much enjoyment-giving or in paying for the name of the product instead of the product itself.

      In many countries that would be 30 or even 20h/week.
    6. Re:Indulgence? by Otto · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Is that brand new 35 inch plasma TV really worth working 60h/weeks?
      Of course not. It would take at least a 72 inch to be worth that.

      Does buying a first generation Blu-Ray burner really compensates for commuting 2h/day every day?
      Actually, I walk to work as it's across the street. If I had a 2 hour commute, then I'd probably have to start actually killing people on my way to work.

      Does getting a SUV instead of cheaper car really compensates for not going on vacations for 3 months to a paradisian island?
      3 months of anything wears pretty thin, really. I've done it. After a couple weeks, you kinda want to go inland a bit. You can pull off the beach thing only for about a month before you need something else.

      Oh, and BTW, railing on SUV owners is very passe nowadays, man. It just shows that you're one of the new enviromentohippies of this day and age, and that you really don't have to be taken seriously. Anybody who is unable to recognize that SUVs have their uses and place in society is generally not somebody worth listening to.

      Buying stuff is a means to and end.
      Working is a means to an end.

      No.

      Buying stuff is a method of acquiring the stuff you want.
      Working is a means of actually getting shit done.

      In my experience most people could work 2/3 or even 1/2 as many hours as they do now and still have the same level of living that that have now ...... if they didn't waste so much money in things that aren't really that much enjoyment-giving or in paying for the name of the product instead of the product itself.
      In many countries that would be 30 or even 20h/week.


      Well, hey, I don't know about you, but I get great amounts of enjoyment out of my big screen TV, or my techno-nerd toys, or my quality vehicle (not an SUV, admittedly). I like to use products that work, which isn't always the case with generics (although some do indeed work well). I like to dress in nice clothes. I like to have nice vacations on the beach. What's more, I like my job. I get enjoyment out of doing what I do.

      So, from my perspective, you're basically suggesting that we all use substandard products and live joyless lives in order to actually work less.

      So you'll have to forgive me, but I just don't think your argument holds a lot of water.

      --
      - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
    7. Re:Indulgence? by bill_kress · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually only a few hours of your work week goes to you. Most of the rest of your time is taken to support those who don't produce (Investors, Managers, ...)

      If everyone actually produced and stopped over-consuming and not working or just "working" by pushing money around, we'd all be able to work just a few hours a week.

      Instead we have many people causing hundreds of us to work producing just for them maintaining their extravagant lifestyles.

      Although you could call this "Creating jobs", since you are only producing for the sake of one individual (or, more generally for "Luxuries") you really aren't creating technology, food or clothing so a HUGE segment of society could just stop working and we'd still be producing enough of the basics for everyone.

      The problem at this point becomes distributing it--Capitalism is not an appropriate solution for the case where people don't actually need to work because a society is overproducing. It does not work when there is only an hour of work a week for everyone but many people would choose to work more, it just falls apart--so instead we have a lot of "Made up" jobs that don't actually produce but just make some other non-producer's life even easier.

    8. Re:Indulgence? by Bastian · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That reminds me of a parable.

      There once was a man who made his living by waking up in the morning, fishing until he caught enough to feed his family, taking it home to cook, and spending the evenings talking with his family.

      One day, a rich man saw what he was doing and told him that, if he would just fish a little bit longer so that he could catch more fish than he needed, he could sell the extra. If he saved that money, he could buy a boat. With a boat, he could catch more fish, until he had the money to hire others to run the boat for him. Then he could live a life of leisure and do anything he wanted with his days while he paid others to catch fish for him.

      The fisherman thought a moment and replied, "If I could do anything I wanted today, I'd get up and fish all morning. Then I'd go home, eat a good meal with my family, and play with my wife and children the rest of the day."

    9. Re:Indulgence? by canadian_right · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Not true.

      We no longer have a production problem. The first world produces way more than it needs. It has so much excess production capacity that we can use a large percentage of our productive capacity to make luxury items. The biggest problem facing large corporations is not production - it is convincing people that they want/need the lastest gadget. Think about it, if one, or even half, of the worlds car manufacturers just stopped making cars would their be a car shortage? At worst the price of new cars would go up a bit.

      If fact, in rich societies marketing departments spend most of their time inventing "new" things or new reasons for people to buy more crap they don't need because all the neccessities are so cheap there is very little profit to be made. Look at all those new "swifter" products (new fangles brooms and mops with lots of disposable parts that need replaced often). A broom works fine and lasts for 10 to 20 years. But they have invented the "swifter" so you can run out and buy those nifty sheets of paper refills it uses.

      --
      Anarchists never rule
    10. Re:Indulgence? by Nurgled · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My lifestyle is pretty cheap. I don't really buy many expensive things. I generally just buy what I need to live and some simple things to make life fun, such as books or TV show DVDs. I could easily live on half my salary and work half as many hours.

      However, no-one is interested in a part-time software developer. There's less overhead in one full-time (40hr/week) employee than two 20hr/week employees. Even though I would love to work a 20hr week in exchange for half of my salary, there are lots of people out there that are happy to work 40hr weeks, meaning there's no market for 20hr/week staff. Unless everybody agrees to half their hours, and thus allows the economy to adjust, as far as I can tell I'm stuck with my 40hr weeks and more money than I really know what to do with.

      (and no, I'm not earning that much compared to most developers. I don't know how those guys manage to spend it all.)

  43. Unfortunately they can vote... and sue by HighOrbit · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Unfortunately these immature people can vote and sue. Their political attitudes basically boil down to an extended version of adolescent rebellion and "self-expression" that is all about self but neither contains substantive content that expresses an idea nor adds to the public discourse. They are usually against traditional social mores (especially religious mores) because they have a vague sense that tradition is somehow repressive of their "self-expression", but they can't really tell you why because they have to admit that any society must have rules to control bad behavior in order to make collective living bearable.

    If you look closely, you'll see that those who protest the loudest about "self-expression" are usually the most conformist, but their conformity is within their own group. They will claim that weird hair, tattoos, and body piercing are about expressing themselves and they don't care what other people think, but here is what puts the test to their lie; All (or most) of their friends will also have weird hair, tattoos, and body piercing. They would never wear a plaid polyester leisure suit in front of their friends, precisely because they do care what their friends think and they have a need to conform within their own social group.

    When these folks have an idea to express other than senseless reflexive nihilism, I'll be listening. But I'm not holding my breath.

  44. 6 year olds? by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Aren't they the little people who you see anoying everyone in public places because they won't stop crying their eyes out? I've always wondered what could be so awful about their lives that they feel the need to cry so much. You've done little to enlighten me.

    --
    Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
    1. Re:6 year olds? by Pep+Strebek · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "I think a bit of empathy is called for, rather than being offended by any inconveneince you might have to endure."

      Sorry, no. It's not the kid's fault that he/she is crying but that's not necessarily what upsets people. People are upset because 9 times out of 10 the parent is ignoring the child that is having a fit rather than:

      A: Calming the child down
      or
      B: Removing the child from the area

      Both of these things are what parents should do in order to show a little consideration for the general public. Your kids needs trump your own, but they don't trump everyone else's.

  45. Wasted energy competing. by FatSean · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think his point was much energy is wasted on the fancy shit. Luxury cars, when all we really need is a model T, so to speak. Buying those 'nice' clothes to impress your preferred sex, or the neighbors, or to show people that you have 'grown up' and can be 'taken seriously'.

    Most of society and culture is wasteful and useless if your goal is to live and be happy.

    --
    Blar.
    1. Re:Wasted energy competing. by stinerman · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I can't remember where the quote came from but it seems in the same vein as what you are saying:

      It is not enough for some people to be happy that they win. Others must lose as well.

  46. Absolutely! by why-is-it · · Score: 4, Funny
    Growing old is mandatory but growing up is optional... and I opted out.

    Absolutely! You are only young once, but you can be immature forever!

    --
    *** Where are we going? And what's with this handbasket?
    1. Re:Absolutely! by really? · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You just described me to a T. And, you know what, I am _PROUD_ of it.
      (Sure my family is ... let's just say ... less than impressed. Shrug.)

      However, being immature does not, for me, mean I am not serious about things it's necessary to be serious about.

      --

      "Consistency is contrary to nature, contrary to life. The only completely consistent people are the dead." A. Huxley
    2. Re:Absolutely! by Tekoneiric · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I agree. It's best to responsible but maintain playfullness and a childlike sense of wonder, to do otherwise would be to stagnate and die mentally.

      --
      *It's not what you can do for the Dark Side but what the Dark Side can do for you!*
    3. Re:Absolutely! by indifferent+children · · Score: 4, Funny
      Do you mean "immature" or "childlike"?

      Which term would describe a 40 year-old living in his mother's basement, watching 7 hours of Adult Swim every night as an alternative to being employed?

      --
      Censorship is telling a man he can't have a steak just because a baby can't chew it. --Mark Twain
    4. Re:Absolutely! by qwerty+asdf · · Score: 2, Funny

      That would be "loser"

  47. Re:Oh I agree ( Was Re:Does this surprise anybody? by misanthrope101 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Honestly, it is getting to the point where I ask, when are people going to take responsibility for their actions - that is the cornerstone of being an adult, making your choices and accepting the consequences of those choices.
    I'd say roughly never. I doubt there has ever been a time when people were really that anxious to claim responsibility for the consequences of their actions. We as a species seem only willing to take responsibility for what we meant to do, not for what we did. Military personnel take credit for defeating the enemy, but it gets kind of quiet if you imply that they might be responsible for the non-combatants they killed--that isn't their fault, just collateral damage. Is that because of the welfare state, too?

    There are other aspects of our culture that dilute personal responsibility. Corporations, by design, insulate managers and shareholders from actions they benefit from personally. We're okay with that, though. No problems there. But if an INDIVIDUAL avoids responsibility, suddenly western civiliazation is in dire trouble. If a corporation files bankruptcy so the shareholders don't have to ante up to pay the debt for the entity they own, we don't bat an eyelash, but if Joe Sixpack declares Chapter 11 then we get all concerned about the state of humanity.

    Government habitually hides behind secrecy to avoid responsibility. Where is the hue and cry? Why is it only the morons on Jenny Jones who get our contumely?

  48. Argument between reserachers and adults... by sgentry6 · · Score: 2, Funny
    Researchers: "Specifically, it seems a growing number of people are retaining the behaviors and attitudes associated with youth. As a consequence, many older people simply never achieve mental adulthood, according to a leading expert on evolutionary psychiatry."

    Adults: "Are not!"

    Researchers: "Clearly if you look at the results of the study there is a clear correlation between adult and child behavior."

    Adults: "Is not!"

    Researchers: "You are proving our point now."

    Adults: "Are not!"

    Researchers: "Are too!"

    Rinse. Wash. Repeat.

  49. Dreams and responsabilities by Aceticon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Accepting that one has responsabilities doesn't mean giving up on one's dreams.

    Being friendly and joking with people is not the same as being immature.

    Being serious all the time and totally giving up one's pleasure in life for the sake of family, community or just to be like everybody else is not maturity, it's being a drone (in my opinion, a sheep).

    Real maturity is achieved when one achieves the level of self-confidence needed to outgrow the "fitting a mold just because thats what one is '(not) expected to do' behaviour" and one finds out it's possible to balance responsabilities and fun without beraking the first or giving up the second.

    Unfortunately, our society is designed around the expectation that most people will "settle down", and become "hard-working family men/women". The push is constantly there to be a nice little drone, work hard to make money, buy loads of stuff that don't really make you happy (consume, consume, consume), become what your neighbours expect you to be and expect the same back from them, accept that you're just another average working stiff, accomodate and don't make waves.

    BTW: Dressing up in a specific style (geek, retro, necro, whatever) to "make a statement", "be different" or "cause a reaction" can be just as much a form of "trying to belong", "accomodating to a sterotype" or in general "being relative to others" as wearing a suit for work - ask yourself "am i dressing this because of who i am or because of who i want to be?". Clothes are a tool - dressing a certain way can help you progress to certain aims, and it's what you are aiming at that matters, not what you wear.

  50. Because it has to be done by Scrameustache · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I reject the traditional concepts of maturity. I refuse to spend my life doing things I don't like because of some outmoded notion of 'have to.'

    Man I would hate to see your toilet, though you neighbours can probably smell it... I, on the other hand, still watch cartoons, still throw paper airplanes, but when I 'have to' do something I don't like to do, I fucking do it.

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

  51. Let's Try a Few by Bob9113 · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'm telling Congress on you.

    My lawyer could beat up your lawyer.

    Boy: I never said I knew where the WMDs were.
    Father: We saw you do it, son.
    Boy: No, no, no, no, no.

    Boy 1: That idea is mine!
    Boy 2: No, you gotta share!
    Boy 1: It's mine! (punches boy 2)

    Boy 1: Wanna play Kerberos?
    Boy 2: Yeah! Only you gotta show me how.
    [They play]
    Boy 2: No, you can't use MD5.
    Boy 1: Yes I can, we always used MD5.
    Boy 2: It's my house, we play by my rules.

    Yup, sounds about right.

  52. One telling quote from the article: by swordgeek · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The article did a rather piss-poor job of explaining what the research is suggesting, which is a pity because the topic is an interesting and complex one. Only one paragraph got the proper consequences:

    "People such as academics, teachers, scientists and many other professionals are often strikingly immature outside of their strictly specialist competence in the sense of being unpredictable, unbalanced in priorities, and tending to overreact."

    So yes, childlike wonder and flexibility are good for learning new stuff, and tend to follow with a more dynamic society. The consequences of it are that people are going to be unbalanced, rash, irritable, and childish.

    There is a guy I work with. He's in his mid-30s, and generally a nice guy. However at times (typically six or eight times a day) I want to scream at him, "GROW UP!!! Take some responsibility for what you're doing!!!" However, I don't. Now there are three 'maturity' issues at play here.
    1) His lack of self-responsibility is immature (lack of responsibility)
    2) My instinctive reaction is immature (ranting and raving like a kid)
    3) My actions are mature (either nothing, talking to his manager, or talking to him professionally)

    I bring this up not to prove my maturity (there are a lot of other cases that aren't so complimentary to me :-), but to illustrate what almost everyone has experienced.

    In a modern workforce, I would expect that maturity equates fairly close to professionalism, and I can definitely say that I've seen a decline in professionalism in the last decade or so. Outside of the workplace, it's a bit trickier. People with kids who try to hard to be their kids' best friends and refuse to apply any discipline are a target, but it's a hard line to draw cleanly. Similarly, one poster mentioned that he and his wife have decided against having kids, because they're not done being kids themselves. This personally strikes me as a bit selfish (a fundamentally immature behaviour), but at the same time they seem remarkably mature in their immaturity.

    At the base of it, I put a lot of the blame on pop culture and society. We venerate and idolise people who embody every negative aspect of immaturity (actors, rock stars, etc.) and naturally come to not only forgive but accept and rationalise their behaviour. At the same time, we know that getting stoned and trashing a hotel room is wrong, so we don't emulate them--however, the bar has already been set, and it's sitting in the mud. We have such a LOW standard of behaviour to exceed that an average eight-year-old is a more mature person than the stars who show up in the tabloids.

    Society's final anti-maturity shot is the entire 'hide your age' industry. Makeup, surgery, and clothes are all designed to avoid aging, because aging reminds us of death. We're a culture so terrified of death that we'll spend billions to shove it under the rug. Unfortunately, that leads to consciously NOT acting like we think grown-ups should do, but rather as kids.

    I could also mention a lawsuit-happy culture discouraging people from taking responsibilty for their own actions, but that would be another page of text, and this post is long enough already.

    Maturity means responsibility. Taking responsibilty for your own life and your own actions, as well as acting responsibly and dealing responsibly with the actions of those around you. It is my personal belief that it doesn't necessarily preclude doing frivolous or foolish things when appropriate, but that historically it was never considered appropriate for adults to do such things. (Anyone remember Mary Poppins?) One exception has always been academics--the image of an absentminded or childlike genius professor is an old one indeed. In contemporary society, immature behaviour is allowed for all adults, and even encouraged. The new marque of maturity will be one who behaves in a mature and responsible fashion (a) when necessary, and (b) when desirable, but not necessarily (c) when not needed.

    Maybe it's really a weakening of true maturity, but as long as (a) and (b) are achieved, I can happily deal with a society that has accepted (c).

    --

    "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
    1. Re:One telling quote from the article: by Coleco · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Maturity means responsibility. Taking responsibilty for your own life and your own actions, as well as acting responsibly and dealing responsibly with the actions of those around you."

      I agree with that statement but disagree with the premise that one needs to be childish in order to adapt to a changing environment.

      You define the problem in vague terms, generalize it to society in general then propose a solution based on a false premise.

      Your argument is taking the general form of many of the comments:

      I observed Problem A once, therefore the problem with society is problem A. Problem A seems be getting worse in recent years. I blame Problem A associated group with the increase in Problem A. If only we could get Problem A associated group to understand that they are cause of society's decline, then they would stop and society would stop declining.

      For instance:

      The problem with society is that people don't discipline their kids anymore. When kids aren't disciplined they don't learn boundaries and think they can do whatever they want without consequences. This is why crime is getting worse and society is falling apart.

      It just seems to me that some people are doing a lot of finger pointing and blaming of things which may not even be problems. Blaming other people and the inability to accept other people's behavior doesn't seem very mature to me.

    2. Re:One telling quote from the article: by swordgeek · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hmm. Apparently I wasn't clear enough in all of my arguments. The fact that I agree with what you say pretty much proves it. :-)

      "I agree with that statement but disagree with the premise that one needs to be childish in order to adapt to a changing environment."

      I didn't mean to make that claim--from what I gather, that's one of the arguments the original article (not the one on Discovery Channnel's website) put forth, although not necessarily as a hard fact. Personally, I wouldn't state that at all. I think that childlike attitudes towards learning and the environment may lead to better and faster adaption to a changing environment. Childish behaviour on the other hand, often accompanies such an attitude but I would say isn't necessarily a linked event. The former allows the latter for the most part, but doesn't necessitate it.

      As for the cop-outs you mention, I was pointing to a number of individual examples, but trying to avoid claiming them as sole evidence for my hypothesis (and really, that's all it is). The examples serve to illustrate what I feel in my gut--that yes, we are getting less mature, and society is encouraging it, either implicitly or explicitly. However, I have to state something that in retrospect wasn't clear enough: We are all responsible for our own actions. Regardless of how Nike would like 40-year-olds to behave, it is our own choice if we behave maturely or not. My example with a coworker was exactly that--my instinct was to react to immaturity with more immaturity, but I consciously chose to not act on that instinct.

      So now if we're all ultimately self-responsible, then how can we point fingers at society? Society--ANY society--defines out background, and our "normal" behaviour. Fifty or five-hundred years ago, it simply wasn't acceptable to behave like a bratty four-year-old at the age of 30. Therefore, the default action was to behave maturely. Thoughts and actions follow each other, so we arguably would have been more mature in our thinking in a more mature society. Simply put, it's more difficult to be mature in an immature environment, that is an environment that promotes and sells immaturity.

      But ain't no one who can make you behave immaturely if you don't let 'em. YOUR maturity (or lack thereof) is YOUR responsibility. MY maturity (or lack thereof) is MY responsibility. What the media packages and sells to us is OUR responsibility to accept or ignore. If any of my blathering is to suggest a solution to the problem, then this is it: Behave well for yourself, those who depend on you, and those who don't. And yes, do have fun.

      --

      "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
  53. Manmaking by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Becoming an adult used to take an explicit ceremony, with months or more of preparation, which every adult completed. Encoding cultural history as well as the expectations of adult behavior.

    As more traditional culture is lost, more people go through life without the benefits of it, or a "new version" that can update it to work in modern society.

    Girls have lost more of these procedures, filtered out along with lots of oppressive female institutions, and probably represent lots of the people not converted into adult personalities. If women's culture included explicit "rites of passage" from girlhood into womenhood, more girls would become women. At least some men have the bar mitzva, or the fraternity pledging.

    I think that if every girl learned about the biology of becoming a woman in "midwife clubs" assisting a group of adult midwifes for a year, then celebrated their own "coming of age", they'd be a lot better integrated with their gender identity as well as their maturity identity. Boys would benefit from it as well, but not as much as girls, just as girls benefit from the masculine cultural bar mitzva, but not as much as boys.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  54. Re:What is wrong with being child-like by Pichu0102 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Adults do that too still. Just look at congress.

  55. Re:Mod parent Interesting by alas_anon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    >> It makes sense that this environment doesn't allow the mental wiring to solidify.

    .. and that is the grand experiment that is happening right now. We evolved to be fully functional in our early teens, but now it is not possible to be fully functional, ever. The environment is a rapidly changing landscape and we will have to run fast to stay in the same place. How to use the phone changes. How to get to work changes. What to do at work changes. We have to keep up. What effect will this have on the psychology of the individual and the structure of our society?

    We have not evolved to be this way. Interesting experiment, no?

    One side effect of this sustained immaturity will probably be that people learn to keep learning and society will have the ability to adapt more rapidly to new situations. In the past the elders would retain rigid rules that made society more stable, but also make it inflexible to change over several generations.

    "Psychological neotony" is a perpetual state of relearning and rethinking the environment. It is what creative and innovative people do. It is also called "arrested psychological development". Arrested development might become the norm and people who are not arrested will need treatment.=-}

  56. From the "The more things change" department... by AWhistler · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In 1979 "The Logical Song" by SuperTramp was my theme...and I was 14.
    So what is so new about this? Some doctor needs to be published and put a name to this thing.

    When I was young, it seemed that life was so wonderful,
    a miracle, oh it was beautiful, magical.
    And all the birds in the trees well they'd be singing so happily,
    joyfully, playfully watching me.
    But then they sent me away to teach me how to be sensible,
    logical, responsible, practical.
    Then they showed me a world where I could be so dependible,
    clinical, intellectual, cynical.

    There are times when all the world's asleep,
    the questions run so deep, for such a simple man.
    Won't you please, please tell me what we've learned?
    I know it sounds absurd, please tell me who I am?
    ...

    This isn't about not maturing, but wishing that he wasn't forced to mature so young,
    and wanting to go back to a simpler time.

    Today kids are kept from learning a lot of things that would get them ready for adulthood.
    I mean please...removing swings and other equipment from playgrounds because they're too dangerous?

    http://kutv.com/health/local_story_086170456.html

    In an effort to shield children from anything dangerous while they grow up, parents and other adults
    fail to prepare children for the real world. And any public institution (read schools) that doesn't
    conform to this complete "safety" policy for children get sued out of existence or can't afford insurance.

    Growing up, I thought my generation would be smart enough to avoid the dumb things my parents' generation
    did to shield us kids from life. Unfortunately my generation is screwing it up even worse.

    It's no wonder so many people have "psychological neoteny" but I doubt the explanation is as simple as TFA says.

  57. Bread and Circuses by ArhcAngel · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I am suprised there has been no reference to Rome just prior to it's fall. The reason the maturity level is lowering is directly related to the amount of maturity needed to survive. Rome was the mightiest civilization throughout history and it fell not from an outside intruder but from apathy from it's citizens. Rome had become so strong that the majority of it's people did not need to protect themselves for they were protected by Roman Centurions. As they became increasingly restless, and immature, Rome enacted the Bread & Circuses policy to provide food and entertainment to keep it's people engaged. Ultimately it could not stem the growing unrest and the people revolted. The current popularity of BLOGS is a perfect place to see the unrest in todays society.

    --
    "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
  58. Interesting hypothesis, crackpot research by xPsi · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I did not personally find the article or the research very credible. The reasons are quite numerous, and I won't discuss them all. But first let me say that I think the underlying hypothesis is fairly reasonable. If I look around me I might say, to first order, that people I know appear to have the "fresh" attitudes of a 20 year old well into their 40s. I might point out that the article is not saying people are "childlike", like a 6-year-old, as other threads have implied -- only "immature". However, this observation has a very skewed baseline. What are we using as a control when we make such an observation like "people used to be more mature"? We are using our childlike memories of our parents, teachers, doctors, etc. as we saw them from the eyes of someone growing up. But I've often been very surprised to learn, post hoc, what my folks and childhood mentors were up to during they're 20s, 30s, and even their 40s and 50s when they weren't interacting with me. Far from stagnating into "maturity" many of them retained a childlike curiosity for the world. They strove to understand themselves and experimented with a lot of crazy stuff (and I'm not just talking drugs here). However, I only saw them through a very specific filter. I feel the article is falling into the same trap, and it even admits this:


    People such as academics, teachers, scientists and many other professionals are often strikingly immature outside of their strictly specialist competence...


    Again, I ask, what is the "research" described in the article using as a control or baseline? This is never discussed -- and it sounds like this "research" is nothing more than an elaborate opinion-piece. TFA even use David Brooks as a kind of "reference." I enjoy David Brooks, even if I don't always agree with him. He is a respectable social commentator and pundit, but he is ultimately a professional opinionist, not a respected psychological researcher.


    Also, can someone help me out with this quote from the article:


    Charlton added that since modern cultures now favor cognitive flexibility, "immature" people tend to thrive and succeed, and have set the tone not only for contemporary life, but also for the future, when it is possible our genes may even change as a result of the psychological shift. [bold emphasis mine]


    Genes shifting as the result of a psychological shift? WTF? It was my understanding that genes needed a bit more than "psychology" to change. Are these guys implying a Lamarckian evolution based not even on physical characteristics but somehow "attitudes affecting evolutionary physiology"? With little snips like this, it makes this work seem very fishy to me, bordering on crackpotism.


    Anyway, while the basic hypothesis has merit, the research the article describes doesn't seem to demonstrate or prove (or even have the ability to demonstrate or prove) the proposed effect.

    --
    i\hbar\dot{\psi}=\hat{H}\psi
  59. Create Immature Adults through Marketing by SwedishChef · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You know, I believe you have got something here. Given the level of immaturity of the characters on "Friends", "Seinfield" and many other television programs combined with the behavior of the actors in various beer commercials, we may have lowered the bar for maturity. If the major media formats in our culture show examples of adult behavior that is, essentiallly, childish then who can blame the viewers for adopting those standards?

    I'm reminded of an ex-girlfriend who seemed to me to over-react to situations. I was puzzled until I realized that she was acting as if she were a character on a television program; where drama is important. We may have a couple of generations now doing the same thing.

    Nice work. :)

    --
    No one ever had to evacuate a city because the solar panels broke!
  60. I agree wholeheartedly by Weaselmancer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As an adult, I am subject to a wider variety of feelings and emotions than a 6 year old. Being an adult is more subtle - we gain access to joys that a child couldn't even understand. When you're six, you know happy, sad, fear, hungry, tired. As an adult you also can experience bemusement, irony, sarcasm, terror, bliss, longing, melancholy, and a host of other things that make the experience of just living through your day more deep and meaningful. Your mental palette is larger. Yes, it means you can be hurt or suffer in larger ways than a child. But you can also rise above them in ways a child could not. The game is bigger, so the rewards are bigger.

    And speaking of the palette, food is an excellent way of describing the difference. As a 6 year old, all you crave is candy. Big ugly blocks of sugar. As an adult, you're complex enough to tell the difference between good sushi and bad. Really expertly done fresh sushi with fresh ground wasabi and some nice sake on the side is sublime, and that's the joy of it, and a child could never understand it. Think of how many things there are like that.

    Another good reason - look at what you would have to go through today. At the risk of sounding like an Auld Farte, think about how bad teenagers have it today. All the good music is gone. Pepsi decides what is cool these days. You have three choices basically. Stupid thumping gangsta rap whose only function is to shake your car's quarter panels, bubblegum crap pop, or Nu Metal where guys with long hair get up in front of the mike, blast the distortion and whine about their relationships.

    And you can't do anything fun or dangerous in this bubble-wrap world we've made. As soon as one kid gets hurt doing something it gets outlawed or regulated past the point of any fun whatsoever. How many childhood memories do you have where you were experiencing both big fun and mild danger at the same time? Are their any stories you have about your childhood that you haven't told your parents yet because you don't want to give them a heart attack? Kids today will never have those kinds of vivid childhood memories. We've outlawed them.

    If God All-Mighty came down from the clouds and told me he would be willing to make me a six year old again, I would politely decline. I've got it better now than I've ever had it, and I feel genuinely sorry for children born in this time.

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
    1. Re:I agree wholeheartedly by Thangodin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Excellent post!

      The subtleties of maturity beat the thrills of immaturity anytime. The world is a complex place, and I love the complexity of it. The best taste in life is bittersweet, with only enough sweetness to prevent the bitter from being bland. It's no surprise that diabetes is on the rise. People have lost the palate for strong tastes. Even fibre comes in a pill, as if eating raw oats and bran is some sort of trial too harsh for people to bear. The world is divided into simple primary colors and basic binaries: red and blue, left and right, liberal vs conservative. Only the caricatures that pass as media personalities fit into these categories. The world is just not that simple.

      It is revealing to contrast the tone of public discourse 50 years ago to what it is today. Ronald Reagan abandoned formal rhetoric for folksy chat, and now we're stuck with it. G W Bush got elected by appearing to be just a regular guy--at some point, people forgot that you don't want just a regular guy as your leader, you want the best and brightest. Distrust of intellectuals is at an all time high, because it takes work to understand what they're saying. But democracy takes work, every single day.

      I've always suspected that the main point of "family values" and all of these exhortations to "think of the children" are just scare tactics to turn the world into the largest nursery in history, where you cannot even have an adult conversation, and where kids aren't even allowed to play unsupervised. Can you imagine a childhood where you have to make "play dates," where it is no longer possible to just walk anywhere? Thanks to media scaremongering, parents see the world as a frightening place with a child molestor or Satanic cult member lurking in every playground. The fact is, your kids are about a hundred times as likely to get killed by a car as they are to be kidnapped. But that doesn't sell soap.

      Even God has been turned into the cosmic wetnurse, who will rapture us up, clean our nappies, and dry our tears. ID promises us the fantasy of every child; that we are the center of the universe, that it's really all for us. Since you're saved by faith alone, you don't have to do jack, just show up at the mega-church for the show and listen to a postmodernist drivel which is equal parts fairy tale and new-age glurge. You gotta hand it to them, they know their market. Why stop at frying your pancreas with candy, when you can get diabetes of the soul too?

    2. Re:I agree wholeheartedly by shadwstalkr · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Even fibre comes in a pill, as if eating raw oats and bran is some sort of trial too harsh for people to bear.

      Great line. It's funny that when I was a kid one of my favorite technology predictions was that we would have an entire meal in a single pill. Oh, the things I would have missed.

      Distrust of intellectuals is at an all time high, because it takes work to understand what they're saying.

      Unfortunately, the black hole of post-modern thought has (at least in the eyes of popular culture) thrown academia into obsolescence. Not only are a lot of academics (usually the loudest ones) wrapped up in circular, navel-gazing, meta-scholarship, the post-modernist attack on, and misapplication of, the scientific method has been taken up by religious and political ideologues. I think people just got fed up with the drivel and apparent infighting and stopped listening. (I know it's unfair and inaccurate to characterize all intellectuals this way, but it definitely seems to be how popular culture portrays them)

    3. Re:I agree wholeheartedly by Gnostic+Ronin · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Well, I think part of the reason that adults don't grow up is that there aren't any real hardships to make them grow up.

      We can give the political equivilant of "I'm gonna hold my breath 'til you give me my candy" -- because we aren't in very much real danger. We live in the first world, a world where "poor" doesn't mean digging for food in the trash, dysentery, or even a shack made of cobbled together materials. "Poor" means no plasma screens, no statilite TV, and Dial up internet.

      We can waste time argueing about flag-burning and gay marriage because we really don't have that many serious domestic problems to be dealt with. Other nations would laugh at our battles. What -- we're "persectuted" because the Wal-Mart greeter doesn't say "Merry CHRISTMAS"? Okay, so exactly what is it called when a man can be beheaded for daring to not be a muslim? We think it's censorship because some jackass wants to ban the sale of M-rated games to 16 year olds? What about the http://hrw.org/english/docs/2005/11/16/saudia12049 .htmSaudi teacher sentenced to 40 months and 750 lashes for "declaring listening to music, smoking, adultery, homosexuality and masturbation as permissible under Islam"?

      The problem -- if you could call it that, keeping Americans and Westerners in general in a "childlike state" is that we don't have nearly as many problems as other people. We stay childlike because the hardships that force other people to grow up quickly just don't happen here.

    4. Re:I agree wholeheartedly by trixillion · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This applies to you as well, or just to other people? That is to say, have you sufferred extreme hardship and as a consequence come to a kind of maturity that others lack? If not, then are you really qualified to wish such things on other people? I've sufferred hardship, but I don't think it gave me maturity so much as compassion. It isn't the sort of thing I'd wish on others.

    5. Re:I agree wholeheartedly by anaesthetica · · Score: 2, Informative
      Ronald Reagan abandoned formal rhetoric for folksy chat, and now we're stuck with it.

      If you're looking for folksy one-on-one's with buddy-prez, you should go back further to FDR's "Fireside chats." Reagan was the "Great Communicator," but he certainly didn't invent Presidential pandering to the lowest common denominator.

  61. Calcification? by MythoBeast · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The ability to change one's mind about things is something that tends to be exclusive to childhood. As people age, changing your mind about something becomes more difficult as the burden of existing evidence increases our psychological momentum. This is a process that I refer to as calcification. Eventually, a person decides that learning new things and changing their minds is no longer worth the effort. The person becomes less flexible and less adaptable to their environment. It isn't a given, but it's very difficult to avoid as one ages.

    Although the article doesn't describe this, I'm wondering if calcification is happening earlier due to a lack of urgency to change one's mind, or if it's happening later because people are presented with more tempting options.

    --
    Wake up - the future is arriving faster than you think.
  62. Re:So? by HighOrbit · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Well, here's the deal with tradition. Obviously, slavish devotion to an idea or behavior simply because it is "tradition" is not always a good thing. But *most* traditional mores are a good thing (as I will explain later). I don't think acting reflexively is good, but not everyone will engage in deep reflection before they decide to take a particular action. If somebody needed a quick guide of right or wrong in regards to a course of action (i.e if one had to quickly pick between reflexive acceptance of tradition and reflexive rejection) then the acceptance would be better. In other words, its better to error on the side of caution.

    Human societies (note the plural) are not young. There have been many trials and errors of different ways of organizing society from simple hunter-gather societies to urban industrial societies. Over the many generations, a certain wisdom gets distilled about what works and does not work. You might think of it as a form of social evolution where useful behavior/ideas are selected (i.e. socially encouraged or rewarded) and harmful behavior/ideas get non-selected (punished/discouraged). The selection of good behavior can range from a mild form such as being considered trusted as honest to stronger forms such as achieving higher social status and privilege . The non-selection of harmful behavior/ideas can range from strong forms such as criminalization to milder forms such as shunning or scolding. This selection of good behavior is transmitted to the next generation as a traditional social moral

    So what you will find is that traditional mores are adopted because they served some social good. Now the traditional mores that most people dwell are those involving sexual behavior. So, lets talk about that. First consider the social goal (i.e. "the Good Thing [tm]) that you want to encourage. In most societies, it has been protecting and providing for the weakest members of society, the children. Most societies, through trial and error, have determined over the generations that best way to provide for children is to have a strong and stable family where at least both parents are available to support the children. Sexual behavior, obviously has a strong impact on families from the actual conception of children to the drama and turmoil that follow adultery. Consequently, social rules in this area revolve around those dedicated to discouraging behavior that would undermine families or lead to children without support. So these social rules were not adopted to sexually repress people or crimp their fun, but to protect the weak.

    No obviously, some past traditions have either outlived their usefulness or were never useful at all (such as racism). Perhaps they were based on pure superstition or the way of life has change sufficiently to render them obsolete. But more often than not, neither is the case, because they are usually about human nature and human nature does not change.

    As far as hypocrisy and religion goes, just because somebody does not follow his own advice does not mean the advice itself is not sound, it just means he is weak and imperfect. And most of the traditional mores that are incorporated into religion can stand on their own. The bible may say "don't commit adultery" and "don't murder", but adultery and murder are bad ideas independent of the bible. More likely than not, the ideas were incorporated into the religion, because they were good ideas to begin with, rather than being pulled out of thin air

    So to reflexively reject social convention, just because you can, really is a sign of immaturity. As I stated before, its really just adolescent rebellion (and hubris), to think you are smarter than the several thousand generations before you.

  63. Green is the yucky flavor. by r00t · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I don't know what chemical they use, but it sure is icky. I don't know if it's the green coloring or the fake "lime", but I sure can recognize it. It's kind of soapy tasting.

    Green Jello is NOT lime. It's green flavor.

    The worst is probably Surge. Eeeeew.

  64. please don't be a parent by r00t · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Sure, one ought to avoid getting into a situation where the child will be tired and cranky, but...

    Once it happens, you have to live with it. The parents who allow themselves to be controlled by a screaming fit are the ones who will get screaming fits. The kids wants control. The kid isn't stupid. If screaming makes you cave, then screaming is what you will get. It's training a kid to scream whenever he gets annoyed.

  65. Nonsense by wytcld · · Score: 4, Interesting
    The faults of youth are retained along with the virtues, he believes. These include short attention span, sensation and novelty-seeking, short cycles of arbitrary fashion and a sense of cultural shallowness.

    This is a bizarre list. In my fifties now, I can recall as a teenager having a much longer attention span. For instance, if I began reading a book in the evening I'd often stay up through most of the night to finish it. I don't do that any more. Sometimes I'll get that focused on a programming problem - but the young have all the advantage in attention span there too.

    Cultural shallowness? Most cultural depth comes from youth. Many of the greatest works of the greatest classical composers were achieved while they were young. And all of the great musical advances and inventions of the 60s - aside from those of Ornette Coleman and Miles Davis - were accomplished by people in their twenties - many of whom had encyclopedic knowledge of the musics they were extending from.

    Short cycles? Sure, invention can move quickly. But arbitrary fashion? Are long-cycle fashions less arbitrary? Should we more respect the whale-bone corsette than bell bottoms on boys? Were the centuries of wearing powdered wigs more "mature" than the several years of goatees and mullets?

    And are we better off in life with no sensation? Would this psychiatrist prefer we were all comfortably numb? Figures. But I'd hardly call his the "mature" approach.
    --
    "with their freedom lost all virtue lose" - Milton
  66. The difference between aging and maturing by wahini · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The author of this article lacks any understanding of the difference between the negative effects of aging and maturing. Being flexible and adaptable are good things, which if kept while you are getting older are a sign of wisdom. Acting irresponsibly is totally unrelated to being flexible. People tend to become inflexible and set in their ways if they don't make an attempt to keep growing. However, personal growth takes effort and while necessary to achieve a minimal state of competence as you grow up, it becomes less important once you reach minimal competence. As a result many people would rather coast and become set in their ways than to put forth the effort and take the risks of growing further.

    Once you have become familiar which one area of life, you take a risk branching off into a less familiar areas of life/learning and expose yourself to the possible ridicule of (small minded) others for making the beginners mistakes in this new area of growth or learning. The payback is well worth it, but you have to be willing to put forth the effort and accept the growing pains.

    People tend to coast if they are not goal driven in some way to continue to improve. Sometimes, a wiser person gives us a nudge or sparks our curiosity so we continue to grow. Most people become more inclined to settle for less as they grow older, especially if you achieve a certain level of financial success intitially.

    The problem is, once people become set in their ways, they want everyone else to act the way they do, so that they feel less insecure. I'm over 50 now, and my worst nightmare is becoming set in my ways, and fearful of change. In the meantime, I will continue to downhill ski down expert ski slopes, go backpacking in the mountains, learn new computer languages, tools and techniques and meet new people.

  67. Not Quite by pikakilla · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Ill bite....

    The "Vae Victis" saying is just part of the myth's of early republic times unless you honestly believe that a conquered people would argue over the amount of tribute in order to save their city. Secondly, latin does not pronounce "v's" like we do. All V's are pronounced as w's and that is that. How hard is it to believe that something sounds "odd" to your ears but sounds normal to those living in that society (ie: japanese substituting r's for l's). Therefore it is very foolish to assume that because something sounds odd it is wrong.

  68. Easy Work Around by ukemike · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There is a way you can re-experience the joys of childhood (and they are many) while maintaining the rich experience of adulthood.

    Become a parent. Then spend lots of time with your children.

    --
    -- QED
    1. Re:Easy Work Around by grammar+fascist · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Become a parent. Then spend lots of time with your children.

      Seconded! I have three. There's nothing like chasing a playground full of kids around while doing a Velociraptor impression.

      (Yes, it includes lifting them off the ground and disemboweling them. In a tickly sort of way.)

      Other adults actually feel a bit jealous when I do it. I can only assume they wish they were less inhibited.

      --
      I got my Linux laptop at System76.
    2. Re:Easy Work Around by honkycat · · Score: 4, Insightful
      As kids get older they tend to appreciate having being treated as real people.
      (I assume you meant 'having been treated'...)

      This is definitely true. My father had a "second batch" of children when I was about 22 so I've had an opportunity to watch him parenting from an adult perspective. One of the things that he does REALLY well is to talk to babies and kids without baby-talking. He has real conversations that are somehow at their level, about things they're interested in.

      He's also very in tune with their truly being small people, with complex feelings and viewpoints. One of the things that annoys him is when a parent tells an embarassing story about a young child while the child is in earshot. I think he's quite right in his belief that kids are able to tell when they're being laughed at before they can really express that they feel embarassed.

      I think paying attention to these things really does a lot to help kids develop, both emotionally and intellectually. My little siblings are two of the most articulate little kids I've ever seen. I think in large part this is because they've been exposed to "adult" talk since long before they could put syllables together. They've definitely been allowed to be kids, but they have also been given a lot of respect as humans. This is definitely something I hope to emulate when I become a father (in about 8 weeks... *gulp*).
    3. Re:Easy Work Around by crotherm · · Score: 2, Interesting

      They've definitely been allowed to be kids, but they have also been given a lot of respect as humans. This is definitely something I hope to emulate when I become a father (in about 8 weeks... *gulp*).

      My wife and I raised our son this same way. We noticed that he prefered to talk with adults rather then children at his age. And, not having the social skills that adults learn through years of social interaction, he would often either embaress adults by catching their mistakes, or faulty logic. We had teachers telling us that he would constantly correct them when they were wrong and his baseball coach used to call him the union rep!

      Ah yes... Aside from all that, interacting with your child on a deep and REAL level is wonderful. All children should be raised as such. And I really feel that it will help with learning in that the child is presented with more complex conversations and thus forcing the brain to learn..

      Congrats...

      --
      "Those who make peaceful revolution impossible, make violent revolution inevitable" - JFK
  69. Adult children are the intended product of schools by davedoom · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In his exceptional book "The Underground history of American Education" John Taylor Gatto details that the stated intent of our education system is to produce permanent childhood.

    He explains that, due to an unusual set of circumstances at the time the USA was formed, young people where given adult responsibility and adult work. The concept of the teen years as a part of childhood did not exist. It was only with the introduction of mass forced schooling that young people lost the ability to deal with adult responsibilities. In fact Gatto contends that compulsion schooling has produced a measurable drop in literacy, inventive thought and maturity.

    Some quotes:

    Now, you needn't have studied marketing to know that there are two groups of people who can always be convinced to consume more than they need to: addicts and children. School has done a pretty good job of turning our children into addicts, but it has done a spectacular job of turning our children into children. Again, this is no accident. Theorists from Plato to Rousseau to our own Dr. Inglis knew that if children could be cloistered with other children, stripped of responsibility and independence, encouraged to develop only the trivializing emotions of greed, envy, jealousy, and fear, they would grow older but never truly grow up. In the 1934 edition of his once well-known book Public Education in the United States, Ellwood P. Cubberley detailed and praised the way the strategy of successive school enlargements had extended childhood by two to six years, and forced schooling was at that point still quite new. This same Cubberley - who was dean of Stanford's School of Education, a textbook editor at Houghton Mifflin, and Conant's friend and correspondent at Harvard - had written the following in the 1922 edition of his book Public School Administration: "Our schools are . . . factories in which the raw products (children) are to be shaped and fashioned.. . . And it is the business of the school to build its pupils according to the specifications laid down."

    This is from the book:

    The second document, the gigantic Behavioral Science Teacher Education Project, outlined teaching reforms to be forced on the country after 1967. If you ever want to hunt this thing down, it bears the U.S. Office of Education Contract Number OEC-0-9-320424-4042 (B10). The document sets out clearly the intentions of its creators--nothing less than "impersonal manipulation" through schooling of a future America in which "few will be able to maintain control over their opinions," an America in which "each individual receives at birth a multi-purpose identification number" which enables employers and other controllers to keep track of underlings and to expose them to direct or subliminal influence when necessary. Readers learned that "chemical experimentation" on minors would be normal procedure in this post-1967 world, a pointed foreshadowing of the massive Ritalin interventions which now accompany the practice of forced schooling.

    The Behavioral Science Teacher Education Project identified the future as one "in which a small elite" will control all important matters, one where participatory democracy will largely disappear. Children are made to see, through school experiences, that their classmates are so cruel and irresponsible, so inadequate to the task of self-discipline, and so ignorant they need to be controlled and regulated for society's good. Under such a logical regime, school terror can only be regarded as good advertising. It is sobering to think of mass schooling as a vast demonstration project of human inadequacy, but that is at least one of its functions. Post-modern schooling, we are told, is to focus on "pleasure cultivation" and on "other attitudes and skills compatible with a non-work world." Thus the socialization classroom of the century's beginning--itself a radical departure from schooling for mental and character development--can be seen to ha

  70. Subject by Legion303 · · Score: 2, Funny

    As a senior citizen, I feel it's my duty to point this out: LOL! PWNT! W00t

  71. Chosen burdens by SuperKendall · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The burden caused by a mortgage and bills are not an illusion. They are quite real. And they are not something you can 'stand upon'.

    A mortgage is determined by what you choose to buy, where you choose to live. Some choose to live without a mortgage by saving enough to pay for housing outright or wandering the earth with a backback.

    Mortgages and bills all represent payments for things you have chosen, and in at least one way they are indeed something you can stand upon for they are all tools for establishing good credit in order to acquire larger loans in the future - if indeed that is your choice.

    Nothing is inherently wrong with choosing the life of a large mortgage and some debt over the life the monastic wanderer. Just don't think fate handed you that mortgage any more than it put the backpack on the pack of the wanderer.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  72. Let me tell you a joke by Moraelin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Let me tell you a joke about nostalgia. Two veterans meet at some war-ending aniversary and have a little chat:

    "Ah, do you remember when they captured us and took us to a concentration camp?"
    "Oh yeah."
    "And how they wanted to take us to the gas chamber?"
    "Aw man, how can I forget that?"
    "And then there was this bombing raid, explosions everywhere and we ran through a hole in the fence? And they chased us with dogs and we hid in the swamp for a week?"
    "Oh yeah. Man, those were the good times."

    Well, admittedly, childhood usually isn't _that_ bad, but still, everyone remembers the good parts, but never remembers the annoyances and frustrations. Or remembers some sanitized rose-tinted version of them. I suppose it must be some mechanism of the brain to stay sane.

    But if I'm to really remember childhood, and without even going into the parts that were due to my parents being... well, completely unfit to be parents, it wasn't _that_ idyllic anyway.

    E.g., take school alone. I could read since the age of 3. In fact, I could read and write in two foreign languages by the time I got into school. I could calculate a transformer or solve other physics problems up to that level. (I guess I must have asked something like "why is the sky blue?" and my parents, god bless their totally nerdy souls, gave me a physics book.) And yet there I was in school required to write a page of oblique lines or loops. Or to write a page worth of the letter "a". How boring is that?

    And that's just one of many issues.

    On the whole, I'll go and say I'm actually a _lot_ happier as an immature adult than I ever was as a child.

    _Now_ I can actually do what I want. If I want a chocolate, I can go buy a chocolate. If I want to buy a doll, I can go buy a doll. (Or The Sims, which is one hell of a doll house simulator.;) If I want to stay up late playing with it, I can jolly well stay up and play with it. Back then I had a ton of people who knew better what I should be doing, what I should be thinking, what I should be saying, etc.

    As for Calvin and Hobbes, or Winnie the Pooh, they're not written by a kid. They're written by an adult, and through rose-coloured nostalgia glasses _and_ from second-guessing the "enemy" at that. They see "man, this kid never listens to a word I say", or "man, he's throwing a tantrum again when I'm trying to teach him proper manners", and from there they go and paint some image of the kid being completely care-free and living in some imaginary wonderland. They don't however, see the frustrations like being treated like a brainless idiot. Or the frustration of that "teaching manners" meaning "Moraelin, say 'hello' to the nice lady?"... again... in front of 10 strangers and 2 of my friends. Or about a hundred other little issues.

    In fact, I'll go and say that all that seeing the kid as a care-free brainless _idiot_ is just... selective confirmation. People start with the preconceived idea that the kid is inherently retarded and unable to ever comprehend adult logic, and from there remember every detail that confirms that, but conveniently forget the details that don't. Or acts like they're some one-in-a-million occurance that's surely just a freak accident.

    And let me also say that a lot of the time, "adult logic" _isn't_. Adults are just as good as kids at rationalizing backwards from what they'd like, to some half-arsed unconvincing "facts" to justify it with. E.g., they start from some pre-conceived wish, like that they want to go camping or fishing (bonus points when it's just to fit in some group, not because they actually like it), and from there work their way backwards to some half-arsed justification, like that shivering in a tent in the rain builds character or that fishing is some kind of valuable RL skill. (How? What for? Exactly in which situation can one possibly catch enough fish with a fishing rod to support a family that way?) Even when they actually do have a point there, they're so convinced that you're an idiot and can't possibly

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
  73. "Pathetic" is in the eye of the beholder by elrous0 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Careful about throwing that word around. Some of us consider middle-aged married men with kids to be just as pathetic as middle-aged men living with their parents. At least the middle-aged guy living with his parents doesn't have to ask for *permission* to go hang out with his buddies. And he never has to wipe anyone's ass either.

    And, for the record, no I do not live with my parents. Nor do I live with a wife who tells me what I can or can't do.

    -Eric

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.