Slashdot Mirror


The Sharpest Object Ever Made

ultracool writes "Forget the phrase 'sharp as a tack.' Now, thanks to new University of Alberta research, the popular expression might become, 'sharp as a single atom tip formed by chemically assisted spatially controlled field evaporation.' Maybe it doesn't roll off the tongue as easily, but considering the researchers have created the sharpest object ever made, it would be accurate."

304 comments

  1. The birth of a new acronym: by dubmun · · Score: 5, Funny

    single atom tip formed by chemically assisted spatially controlled field evaporation: SATFBCASCFE. Sharp as a SATFBCASCFE... hmmm maybe not.

    --
    (end of post)
    1. Re:The birth of a new acronym: by Kookus · · Score: 1

      chemically assisted spatially controlled field evaporated tip cascfet a bit easier.

    2. Re:The birth of a new acronym: by dubmun · · Score: 3, Funny

      pronounced KASK-feht? I like it!

      You are sharp as a CASCFET!

      --
      (end of post)
    3. Re:The birth of a new acronym: by nacturation · · Score: 1

      What will it be as sharp as when they make a super hard iridium tip?

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    4. Re:The birth of a new acronym: by uberjoe · · Score: 1

      Not as sharp as your wit apparently.

      --

      The days of the digital watch are numbered.

    5. Re:The birth of a new acronym: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      or...

      "Single Tip of Atom By Field (Assisted & Controlled) Evaporation)

      STABFACE

    6. Re:The birth of a new acronym: by 955301 · · Score: 4, Funny

      How about

      SCAT-CAFE

      Spacially Controlled Atom Tip by Chemically Assisted Field Evaporation.

      I think it might dooo fine so long as nobody digs up the meaning of scat.

      --
      You are checking your backups, aren't you?
    7. Re:The birth of a new acronym: by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 4, Funny
      SCAT-CAFE

      That plus it adds the punchline to, "Where do dung-beatles go for a light meal?"

      --
      If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
    8. Re:The birth of a new acronym: by JesseL · · Score: 1

      That'll just make people think of kopi luwak.

      --
      "Prefiero morir de pie que vivir siempre arrodillado!"
    9. Re:The birth of a new acronym: by fotoflojoe · · Score: 2, Funny

      single atom tip formed by chemically assisted spatially controlled field evaporation: SATFBCASCFE. Sharp as a SATFBCASCFE... hmmm maybe not.

      "Well, he's not the sharpest SATFBCASCFE in the drawer."
      Oh, wait...

    10. Re:The birth of a new acronym: by brouski · · Score: 1
      pronounced KASK-feht? I like it!

      You are sharp as a CASCFET!

      I think Michael Dorn called me that on my Klingon audio dictionary.

      --
      Proud member of the American Non Sequitur Society. We might not make much sense, but boy do we love pizza!
    11. Re:The birth of a new acronym: by brouski · · Score: 1
      SCAT-CAFE
      I'm sure there's a porn company out there that already has a trademark on that.
      --
      Proud member of the American Non Sequitur Society. We might not make much sense, but boy do we love pizza!
    12. Re:The birth of a new acronym: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Single Atom Tip by Field Evaporation, Controlling Everything Spatially

      For everyone else, it'll be known as "SAT by FECES"

    13. Re:The birth of a new acronym: by Stormwatch · · Score: 1
      I think it might dooo fine so long as nobody digs up the meaning of scat.
      I know it means Special Cybernetic Attack Team.
    14. Re:The birth of a new acronym: by Mascot · · Score: 1
      I think it might dooo fine so long as nobody digs up the meaning of scat.

      Scat
            Jazz singing in which improvised, meaningless syllables are sung to a melody.

      Which brings the music of Scatman to mind. Quote a lot worse than some other meanings of the word.
    15. Re:The birth of a new acronym: by Pyrowolf · · Score: 1

      If only there was a -1 - "Earth: Final Conflict Reference"

    16. Re:The birth of a new acronym: by 955301 · · Score: 1


      Not only that, I hear they cut the cheese there like nowhere else in the world. Sharp as a SCAT-CAFE.

      --
      You are checking your backups, aren't you?
    17. Re:The birth of a new acronym: by Wyrd01 · · Score: 1

      How about just "Sharp as a CAT" (Controlled Atom Tip)?

      We don't say "sharp as a tack, created by such and such a method" so why include that extra stuff in this acronym?

    18. Re:The birth of a new acronym: by od05 · · Score: 1

      Quite a lot of information out there about scat if you do feel like reading up on it.

    19. Re:The birth of a new acronym: by Drooling+Iguana · · Score: 1

      Just make a tack with this new method and the old expression will still work.

      --
      ... I'm addicted to placebos
  2. Nitrogen? by m_chan · · Score: 5, Funny

    "they were able to coat peripheral atoms near the peak with nitrogen"

    Nitrogen?? That chunk who wears a dress-size seven? She sneezes crisco. Sharp? Yeah, like a marble. Wake me up when we get to Kate Moss waif-like Hydrogen. Then I can carve my initials on tubby Boron.

    1. Re:Nitrogen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      At first I thought you were on acid. Then I took a sip of coffee and saw the genius in your statements. Well done.

    2. Re:Nitrogen? by John+Nowak · · Score: 1

      I agree, as does my mug. Three cheers.

    3. Re:Nitrogen? by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 1

      Yo' Momma's Boron!

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
  3. Too complicated by AKAImBatman · · Score: 4, Funny
    Forget the phrase 'sharp as a tack.' Now, thanks to new University of Alberta research, the popular expression might become, 'sharp as a single atom tip formed by chemically assisted spatially controlled field evaporation.

    How about, "sharper than a tack?"

    Has a nice ring to it, don't you think?
    1. Re:Too complicated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess the U of A had to make the sharpest object to compensate for Alberta producing the dullest object as well... Our Prime Minister Stephen Harper.

    2. Re:Too complicated by asuffield · · Score: 1
      How about, "sharper than a tack?"


      "Sharper than a cricket stump", with a nod to Murray Walker.
    3. Re:Too complicated by DJStealth · · Score: 1
      I like your's better, because..
      "Maybe it doesn't roll off the tongue as easily, but considering the researchers have created the sharpest object ever made, it would be accurate."

      Is actually not accurate; as there would probably not be any objects as sharp as that.
  4. I bet by rtyall · · Score: 0, Redundant

    It's not as sharp as the rapier wit you see on here everyday. Ba-boom Tish.

    1. Re:I bet by surdsforme · · Score: 2, Informative

      from the not-as-sharp-as-my-wit dept.

  5. Still not as sharp as... by MikeB0Lton · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...Chuck Norris

    1. Re:Still not as sharp as... by NetDanzr · · Score: 3, Funny

      I don't know what's more funny: the fact that this comment appears modded as "Insightful", the fact that 30% Funny, 30% Overrated and 20% Troll combine for an "Insightful" rating, or the fact that the three moderation categories don't add to 100%.

    2. Re:Still not as sharp as... by KDR_11k · · Score: 5, Informative

      or the fact that the three moderation categories don't add to 100%.

      You are aware that that list only shows the three mods with the most percentage?

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    3. Re:Still not as sharp as... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are aware that that list only shows the three mods with the most percentage?

      Well, no, obviously.

  6. Get dull? by imboboage0 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Well over time knives get dull from use. unless I'm mistaken, this one atom could easily break off, right? Wouldn't it be instantly dull?

    --
    Honesty may be the best policy, but by process of elimination, dishonesty is the second best policy.
    1. Re:Get dull? by surdsforme · · Score: 1

      blunt even

    2. Re:Get dull? by Golias · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well over time knives get dull from use. unless I'm mistaken, this one atom could easily break off, right? Wouldn't it be instantly dull?

      As long as it is only used to poke really soft, non-abrasive things, you should be good to go.

      Of course, some nay-sayers might ask why you would ever need The Sharpest Object Ever Made to poke holes in chocolate pudding, but who needs that kind of negativity?

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    3. Re:Get dull? by MrSquirrel · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I don't think it would be very easy to just "break off" (you're talking about powerful electron-proton bonds). You could try and get the atom to bond with another atom... but it already has a pretty cozy home. A knife made of this would probably be pretty bendy at the blade... but it would still have a mean cut!

      --
      A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing.
    4. Re:Get dull? by nacturation · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Well over time knives get dull from use. unless I'm mistaken, this one atom could easily break off, right? Wouldn't it be instantly dull?

      "Such a pointy pyramid of metal atoms would normally just smudge away spontaneously..." I'll let you actually RTFA for the hilarious, biting conclusion.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    5. Re:Get dull? by richdun · · Score: 1

      That's my biggest quesetion. Sharp is nice, but sharp and hard is what you need. Dislocating a single atom should be easy, unless these are some sort of super-close-packed. But, it sounds like the nitrogen coating is on the outside, so I'm wondering how tight the structure could be.

    6. Re:Get dull? by RobertNotBob · · Score: 4, Informative
      from TFA, they are planning on using it for an electron emitter in an electron microscope.

      In THAT application, the small size of the point is of great advantace without ever physically touching anything.

      --
      ___ I don't respond to Anonymous Cowards, and I Never Mod them UP.
    7. Re:Get dull? by prefect42 · · Score: 1

      It's not always a problem that they blunt. Using glass blades to make slides for electron microscopy makes *seriously* sharp knives but they're so fragile you use them as disposables. http://bomi.ou.edu/bmz5364/making-knives.html

      --

      jh

    8. Re:Get dull? by Random+Destruction · · Score: 1, Informative

      Hard to break off? Put any weight on it and it would just deform. Its a single atom man. A tomato would destroy it.

      --
      :x
    9. Re:Get dull? by hardburn · · Score: 4, Funny

      Do they thrown in a russian nuke in a motorcycle side seat with those glass knives?

      --
      Not a typewriter
    10. Re:Get dull? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was wondering how long it would take for a Snow Crash reference. :-)

    11. Re:Get dull? by SquadBoy · · Score: 1

      You, sir, are my god. For a minute there I thought noone would mention it.

      --

      Cypherpunks: Civil Liberty Through Complex Mathematics. Those who live by the sword die by the arrow.
    12. Re:Get dull? by SnarfQuest · · Score: 1

      For some reason this post sounded odd to me, sorta like:

      Nice little tip you got there. Be a shame if something happened to it. You wouldn't want anything to happen to it, would ya?

      --
      Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
    13. Re:Get dull? by MrNougat · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      And I bet those would make some super awesome hi-performance spark plugs.

      --
      Web 2.0 == Giant Blogspam Circle Jerk
    14. Re:Get dull? by Fordiman · · Score: 1

      Naw. Since the bonds holding the atom in place are stronger than, say, the bonds holding the skin of a tomato together, the tip would slide in and through the tomato skin almost as if it weren't there.

      --
      110100 1101000 1101000 1100110 0 1101111 1101000 1100011 1
    15. Re:Get dull? by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1
      Actually, I would bet that the tip would be destroyed even before it hit a tomato. Probably within seconds of removing the blade from a vacuum, exposure to the air would corrode that single atom off of the tip. If nothing else, it probably wouldn't survive its first encounter with a stray ozone molecule.

      Even if it somehow survived and made it into the tomato, that thing is full of thousands of acids, enzymes and other chemicals that are good at breaking down chemical bonds.

    16. Re:Get dull? by mranchovy · · Score: 2, Funny
      Naw. Since the bonds holding the atom in place are stronger than, say, the bonds holding the skin of a tomato together, the tip would slide in and through the tomato skin almost as if it weren't there.


      ...cuts tomato slices so thin you can almost see through them! NOW how much would you pay? But wait, there's more!
      --
      I am so smart!
      I am so smart!
      S-M-R-T!
      I mean S-M-A-R-T!
    17. Re:Get dull? by Fordiman · · Score: 1

      Meanwhile, even if it lost a thousand layers of point-stuff, it would still be plenty sharp enough to pass right through that tomato, enzymes and all.

      Still, the point (ahem) is moot; it's to be used as an cathode emitter. As such, the resolution at which it can fire electrons is directly proportional to the sharpness of its point.

      --
      110100 1101000 1101000 1100110 0 1101111 1101000 1100011 1
    18. Re:Get dull? by smokeslikeapoet · · Score: 1

      Well that shure beats the hell out of a ginsu.

    19. Re:Get dull? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You still wouldn't be able to take it to the airport.

    20. Re:Get dull? by MrNougat · · Score: 1

      Hey, that's not offtopic! That's how spark plugs work; there needs to be a sharp edge on the electrode and the ground for there to be a strong clean spark. Same way this is being used, really, as an electron gun.

      --
      Web 2.0 == Giant Blogspam Circle Jerk
    21. Re:Get dull? by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 1

      Just don't let the Kzinti have one without the proper TASP.

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    22. Re:Get dull? by RockModeNick · · Score: 1

      Yes, this is a single atom point, not a single atom edge... you could theortetically create a single atom edge too, but you'd be wasting your time, good whetstones followed by stropping with a quality buffing compound give a mirror polished beyond razor cutting edge to knives.

    23. Re:Get dull? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      That's something I wanted to talk about. My understanding is that the present (well, now former) winner of the world's sharpest object was "any piece of broken glass" since when you break glass, somewhere along the break there is always supposed to be a monomolecular edge. So like, is this sharper than broken glass because the atom facing away from the bulk of the structure has a lesser atomic number than whatever sticks out on glass? What all is in glass, anyway? I know about the silicon...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    24. Re:Get dull? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      glass has a monomolecular edge. the tip of this is just an element, hence monoatomic.

      It is inconceivable that the tip of this is an unbound atom. Individual atoms simply do not behave like groups of atoms, especially ones that are bound up.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    25. Re:Get dull? by JZik · · Score: 1

      I'm a grad student in Robert Wolkow's research group so maybe I can clarify a couple of things.

      It's true that such a tip would get dull easily if it were used like a knife or a tack or to poke at things. However what I think will be the best uses for it are situations where the tip is not in actual physical contact with a surface. In a field emission gun electron microscope, electrons are emitted from the tip where the field is highest; the sharper the tip the higher the field. There is no touching of a surface, just electrons being emitted from a point source.

      Mr. Rezeq has shown us field ion microscopy (FIM) movies of the tip where you can clearly see it etched away from hundreds of atoms down to one. Now there are lots of atoms below that, but FIM only shows atoms where the field is highest. So that picture is a picture of where electron emission would occur as well, i.e. a single atom.

      In STM having a sharp tip is also desirable, and there the end of the tip hovers over a surface, just barely but not actually touching it. Even then the tip can be damaged over time, but with care it can stay atom-sharp very long.

    26. Re:Get dull? by Thornlord · · Score: 1

      Not so much dull as less sharp. That's still a fine edge ya got there even with 2 atoms

  7. Aleut harpooner by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It sounds like science is catching up with the glass blades Raven carries in Neal Stephenson's book Snow Crash.

    Dmitri "Raven" Ravinoff -- An Aleut native who works as a mercenary. His preferred weapons are glass knives - undetectable by security systems and reputed to be molecule-thin at the edges - and throwing spears. He travels on a motorcycle whose sidecar has been replaced with a hydrogen bomb that will automatically detonate if his heart stops beating.

    On another technicality, isn't pencil lead actually made up of sheets a single molecule thick?

    We could arm minjas (midget ninjas) with these molecular spears and graphite shurikens to make the real ultimate killing power even more ultimaterer.

    --
    liqbase :: faster than paper
    1. Re:Aleut harpooner by milamber3 · · Score: 1

      I think you are mistaking molecule (at least two atoms joined together) for atom. His blades in the book were very sharp glass that was 1 sheet of molecules thick. This point is 1 atom, that's by definition sharper.

    2. Re:Aleut harpooner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's why he said science is 'catching up', not 'caught up'.

    3. Re:Aleut harpooner by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      Actually graphite sheets (graphene) a single atom thick have been created.
      When you rub out your pencil lines, you create small amounts of these sheets which are typically multi layered but can be seperated.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    4. Re:Aleut harpooner by dr_dank · · Score: 0

      We could arm minjas (midget ninjas) with these molecular spears and graphite shurikens to make the real ultimate killing power even more ultimaterer.

      Just goes to prove that Minjas can be totally short AND totally awesome!

      --
      Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
    5. Re:Aleut harpooner by Elvis+Parsley · · Score: 2, Informative

      Um...we (that is, humanity) have been making blades like that for millenia. The knives Raven uses in Snowcrash are simply flaked stone tools, a technology which appeared in the Upper Paleolithic. Their major drawback is that they lose their edge quickly when used, but they're nigh-trivial to make if you've got a lump of obsidian or other cryptocrystaline material. Eye surgeons were starting to use stone blades a few decades ago, though their use has been superceded by lasers.

    6. Re:Aleut harpooner by milamber3 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, if you bothered to think before replying you would have realized that science has not only caught up but has also surpassed the book since an ATOM is smaller than a MOLECULE.

    7. Re:Aleut harpooner by tinkerghost · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Microtome blades for Transmition Electron Microscopy are either made from cracked glass (cheap & disposable, but I used to do 2 or 3 at a pop to get one with a clean break) or gemstone (emerald, saphire, and diamond) cleaves (longer lasting but fragile and pricy).
      Oh and for nigh-trivial - check out National Geographic segments on this - it's a bitch & a half to get a consistant & usable blade (something sharp to accidently cut yourself with appears much easier).

    8. Re:Aleut harpooner by pimpimpim · · Score: 1
      On another technicality, isn't pencil lead actually made up of sheets a single molecule thick?

      No, these are actually stacks of graphite sheets, a bit like this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Graphit_gitter. png

      --
      molmod.com - computing tips from a molecular modeling
    9. Re:Aleut harpooner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That sort of bomb doesn't sound too clever if you get a momentary cardiac arrest.

    10. Re:Aleut harpooner by Elvis+Parsley · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I suspect we're talking about different things. It's fairly easy to get the sort of blade useful for the kinds of things Raven did. I never got past flakes and hand-axes myself, but I knew a number of people who got the hang of pressure-flaked blades pretty quickly. I'm entirely willing to believe that getting a useful blade for a microtome (I can see how consistency would be a very large problem) is an entirely different kettle of rocks.

    11. Re:Aleut harpooner by jeblucas · · Score: 1
      an ATOM is smaller than a MOLECULE
      C'mon man, this is Slashdot. You can't make claims like this without knowing someone is going to bust you. A Cesium ATOM has a "size" of about 300 pm, and a hydrogen MOLECULE has a "size" a little smaller (interatomic distance is 150 pm). Atom > Molecule.
      --
      blarg.
    12. Re:Aleut harpooner by Fordiman · · Score: 1

      Glass at that thickness wouldn't hold together very well. It would shatter rather quickly.

      --
      110100 1101000 1101000 1100110 0 1101111 1101000 1100011 1
    13. Re:Aleut harpooner by milamber3 · · Score: 1

      Wonderful, you found a completely irrelevant example to bust me. The molecule we are talking about is most likely silicon dioxide, but I don't recall that he ever gets more specific than "glass" in the book. SiO2 will definatly be bigger than a single metallic atom so my point is correct and relevant.

    14. Re:Aleut harpooner by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 1
      flaked stone tools...

      ...which are made by thermal shock, not chipping fyi. You heat the blade-to-be in the fire, then add drops of water where you want the edge to be. Little flakes pop off. It's the reason why you see a lot of chipped flint knives, but no "stone chipping" tools. Flint and obsidian are really susceptible to thermal shock, and were the preferred material, although I believe some jasper tools were found in the American Southwest.

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    15. Re:Aleut harpooner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Snow Crash was a great book. Further, glass is amorphous so a glass knife become less sharp over time as it flows. Check out really old windows. They are thinner at the top and thicker at the bottom as the glass moves.

    16. Re:Aleut harpooner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dmitri "Raven" Ravinoff -- An Aleut native who works as a mercenary. His preferred weapons are glass knives - undetectable by security systems and reputed to be molecule-thin at the edges - and throwing spears. He travels on a motorcycle whose sidecar has been replaced with a hydrogen bomb that will automatically detonate if his heart stops beating.

      Hasn't the guy heard of CPR???

    17. Re:Aleut harpooner by Bobsledboy · · Score: 1
    18. Re:Aleut harpooner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, my statement is correct --- it is, however, simply not currently supported by facts! I should run for office...

    19. Re:Aleut harpooner by Zwack · · Score: 1

      If you have that type of bomb your cardiac arrest won't be momentary... :-)

      Z.

      --
      -- Under/Overrated is meta-moderation, and therefore is Redundant.
    20. Re:Aleut harpooner by Zwack · · Score: 1

      Ummm... Not always...

      Knapping involves "chipping away" bits of flint... Some people might use fire and water, but others hit the stone with something else...

      Z.

      --
      -- Under/Overrated is meta-moderation, and therefore is Redundant.
  8. Sharp? by tygerstripes · · Score: 4, Funny

    I won't be impressed until they split the atom. Now THAT will be a shiny pin.

    --
    Meta will eat itself
  9. Next up... by DaveM753 · · Score: 0

    The Sharpener!

  10. super-fine electron microscope by 192939495969798999 · · Score: 1

    Now that we can use these to apparently make a super-hi-fi electron microscope, maybe we can use them in the electron guns of TV's and create super Xtreme HD! I for one welcome our potentially ever-changing HD format overlords.

    --
    stuff |
  11. Tacks? How about the devil? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm more in favour of "as sharp as the devil himself", but you know...with our PC society we have to settle with tacks...how dull! (Pun intended!)

  12. Ancient tools/weapons were close by SatanClauz · · Score: 2, Informative

    I remember watching a documentary on Discovery or History about the technique of chipping the edges on weapons and tools created molecule sharp blades.

    they didn't need all that research and science, just a couple rocks! ;)

  13. Kill Bill Vol 3 by Van+Cutter+Romney · · Score: 1
    --
    Help a man when he is in trouble and he will remember you when he is in trouble again.
  14. Make it available... by blindbug · · Score: 1

    Now they need to make knives out of it and have Ron Popeil endorse it! "For a limited time, I will throw in a Poultry Cooker Ray-Gun. And all for only 13 easy payments of $2,234.99!"

    1. Re:Make it available... by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 1

      Shocked stereotype German: "Finer than our German monomolecular tungsten tips?"

  15. But HOW Sharp?? by bigtimepie · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Can it penetrate virtually any material? Does it dull after use? Will it be publicly available?

    1. Re:But HOW Sharp?? by joper90 · · Score: 1

      The question you really want to ask is:
      will ninjas use it?

    2. Re:But HOW Sharp?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you really WANT it to become publicaly available?

    3. Re:But HOW Sharp?? by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      But does it run Linux?

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
  16. Re:rubbish by a_nonamiss · · Score: 3, Funny
    these people have never seen my dick.
    The end of your dick is as tiny as a nitrogen atom? That's hardly something to brag about...
    --
    -Arthur
    Cave ne ante ullas catapultas ambules
  17. As Seen On TV! by radiumhahn · · Score: 1

    It slices! It dices! Watch as it cuts through this ... oops lost a thumb!

    1. Re:As Seen On TV! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remeber to save the gizard, and use it to stop the bleeding.... Damn I'm old....

  18. Time to upgrade my by BigGar' · · Score: 1, Funny

    rapier like wit, to "sharp as a single atom tip formed by chemically assisted spatially controlled field evaporation" like wit.

    --


    Shop smart, Shop S-Mart.
  19. If it's that sharp ... by Spacejock · · Score: 1

    ... it won't so much roll off the tongue as slice right through it.

  20. The old saying... by bigtimepie · · Score: 1

    I never thought the old saying was any good anyways... There's just too many different tacks in the world! I always ended up clarifying.

    "Man, you're sharp as a tack! ...a sharp tack, that is!"

    1. Re:The old saying... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've always gone with "Xer than an X man's X bits", for any adjective X :-)

      AC

  21. Accurate? by geoffspear · · Score: 1

    How is saying that something which is not the sharpest object ever made is 'sharp as a single atom tip formed by chemically assisted spatially controlled field evaporation' in any way "accurate"? I'd wager that the sharpness of whatever you're comparing is a lot closer to the sharpness of a tack than it is to a single atom tip.

    --
    Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
  22. Even the tack is too sharp by mcguiver · · Score: 1

    to describe most people that I know

    1. Re:Even the tack is too sharp by jZnat · · Score: 1

      Stop hanging out at digg, then.

      --
      'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
  23. Let me know by 27,000 · · Score: 0

    when they've created something better than a monofilament whip. 10S is good, but we need something that keeps up with troll melee.

    --
    My problem with spontaneous human combustion is that never seems to happen to the "right" people.
    1. Re:Let me know by lucifig · · Score: 1

      I'll stick with my flechette gun thank you! (I got the reference).

  24. Cyberpunk weapons by cHALiTO · · Score: 3, Funny

    Cool! now I can get myself a monokatana!!

    --
    "Luck is my middle name," said Rincewind, indistinctly. "Mind you, my first name is Bad." -- Terry Pratchett
    1. Re:Cyberpunk weapons by newt0311 · · Score: 0

      how about a monokodachi. since kodachis are smaller, they can achieve faster speeds. thus with a monokidachi, you could defeat a monokatana due to faster speeds. BUT... then of course, I would still destroy you with my safeguard suit and Gravitational Beam emitter http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_Beam_Em itter. MUHAHAHAHA.

  25. Bread by certel · · Score: 2, Funny

    Does it still squish the bread?!

  26. Sharp enough? by CPNABEND · · Score: 1

    So, does this mean it is sharp enough to get the wrapper off of a CD?

    --
    My wife doesn't listen to me either...
    1. Re:Sharp enough? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's so sharp it can slice the DRM off a Sony CD.

    2. Re:Sharp enough? by Deltaspectre · · Score: 1

      Bit by bit

      --
      My UID is prime... is yours?
  27. OK, I tried to cut... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...the cheese with it, but it passed right through it!

  28. Pardon me but, by ericspinder · · Score: 2, Funny
    I didn't think that anyone believed that a tack was the 'sharpest', needles are well know to be very sharp as well. Personally, I think the phrase that I will be forgetting is "sharp as a single atom tip formed by chemically assisted spatially controlled field evaporation.", as no other items will be as sharp as it, and I'd have few uses for it.

    I know the submitter is tring to be whitty, but I'd have to use 'sharp as a bowling ball' to describe his attempt. Surely there must have been a better way of announcing this break-through, like "Do you want you pastrami cut thin!".

    --
    The grass is only greener, if you don't take care of your own lawn.
    1. Re:Pardon me but, by hardburn · · Score: 2, Funny

      If by 'witty' you mean "copy-and-pasted first paragraph of the article", then yes, the submitter is witty.

      --
      Not a typewriter
    2. Re:Pardon me but, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      who cuts pastrami with a needle?

    3. Re:Pardon me but, by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      I'm so sick of the phrase "sharp as a bowling ball" that should we ever meet, I'm going to stab you with a vorpal spoon.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    4. Re:Pardon me but, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      who cuts pastrami with a needle?
      True. How about "Junkies rejoice, new sharper needle may reduce track marks."
    5. Re:Pardon me but, by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 1

      I didn't think that anyone believed that a tack was the 'sharpest'

      You've obviously never laid or removed carpet. There may be sharper points, but those tacks get personal.

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    6. Re:Pardon me but, by RockModeNick · · Score: 1

      Sharper cuts can lead to more scarring, without very skilled stitching, because irregularities along the length of a wound often help preserve cell alighnment during regrowth, while perfectly, perfectly smooth cuts left to heal without perfectly skilled stitches usually line up wrong.

    7. Re:Pardon me but, by devilspgd · · Score: 1

      I believe that IS what passes for witty on /.

      --
      Give a man a fish, he'll eat for a day, but teach a man to phish...
  29. TSA rule update by ThunderJon · · Score: 1

    * Passengers may not have on the person cargo with atomic or subatomic slicing capabilities or any other nitrogen coated particles. "tough protective paint job" - I'm wondering if I can get some of these in my favorite NFL team colors.

  30. Until I can shave with it... by smackdotcom · · Score: 1

    ...I don't want to hear about it. Mind that expect that sharp a razor to come with safety wires, cause I'm not going to be able to fork out for skin transplants after Gillette charges me, what, three million dollars for this sort of thing by the time it hits the market.

    --

    In a world without walls, there is no need for Windows.

    1. Re:Until I can shave with it... by RingDev · · Score: 1

      That was my first thought as well! How long until I can be stubble free with out razor burn!?!?

      -Rick

      --
      "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
    2. Re:Until I can shave with it... by hey! · · Score: 1

      Oh, you can shave with it, you just have to have a delicate touch and be patient enough to shave each whisker one molecule at a time.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    3. Re:Until I can shave with it... by sphealey · · Score: 1

      > after Gillette charges me, what,
      > three million dollars for this sort
      > of thing by the time it hits the market.

      And you just _know_ they are already working on a version with NOT one but THREE points to follow on after that, at $11 million/cartridge.

      sPh

    4. Re:Until I can shave with it... by BigCheese · · Score: 1

      You could just grow a beard. It's much easier.

      --
      The obscure we see eventually. The completely obvious, it seems, takes longer. - Edward R. Murrow
  31. Nothing is sharper than... by TrueKonrads · · Score: 1

    Nothing is sharper than Sharpie!
    Or a witty saying...

    --
    Lone Gunmen crew.
    1. Re:Nothing is sharper than... by utopianfiat · · Score: 1

      Witty saying as req'd:
      Diamond is one of the sharpest metals, if not THE sharpest metal known to man.

      Oops, 4chan memes aren't witty ;[

      --
      +5, Truth
  32. Not Sharp Enough to..... by csavage · · Score: 1

    Take down the Black Knight.

    1. Re:Not Sharp Enough to..... by Malakusen · · Score: 1

      It's only a flesh wound.

      --
      Never give in--never, never, never, never, in nothing great or small, large or petty, never give in except to conviction
  33. Ok, that is sharp, but... by bicho · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ... Does it cut?

    --

    errera hunamum ets
  34. The Subtle Knife by Overzeetop · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Call me when the edge cuts through to another universe.

    (Just finished reading the dark materials series. Terribly disappointing, I must say. Started with a bang and finished with a whimper. Hell, I'm a big fan of bittersweet endings, but this one was just pitiful and frayed)

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  35. Here's my question... by T_ConX · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Could it run Linux?

  36. Reaper Man by ackthpt · · Score: 1

    It sounds like science is catching up with the glass blades Raven carries in Neal Stephenson's book Snow Crash

    I prefer the scythe Death wields in the Diskworld books, so delicate it can havest the soul of a deep-sea organism, yet able to harvest a field of wheat, one straw at a time. And he tries to sharpen the blade with everything even sun light, but it is still far to dull for the job when he must confront his replacement.

    any sufficiently advanced science is indistinguishable from magic

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Reaper Man by Rysith · · Score: 1

      You forgot the best part, which is that the scythe glows blue along its edge because it's sharp enough to slice air molecules apart with the pressure that they exert on the blade. If that's not impressively sharp, I'm not sure what is.

  37. According to Mick Dundee... by teknopagan · · Score: 4, Funny

    That's not a knife...

    --
    The Russian Mafia will mod you down just to see if the Moderate button works.
    1. Re:According to Mick Dundee... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see you've played knifey spooney before!

  38. A Subtle Knife by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So is this Philip Pullman's Subtle Knife then?....I look forward to being able to skip between dimensions...oh no what happened to my little finger :-)

  39. Picture! by the_mind_ · · Score: 5, Funny

    Here is a picture.
    5M x amplification

            .

    --
    You feel sleepy. Close your eyes. The opinions stated above are yours. You cannot imagine why you ever felt otherwise.
    1. Re:Picture! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here is a picture from the side.
      10M x amplification

            .

  40. The sharpest object has already been discovered by asoukup · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    The sharpest object is a fart - it cuts through your pants without leaving a mark.

    1. Re:The sharpest object has already been discovered by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "...without leaving a mark."

      wait until you get older

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  41. Informative? by Lordpidey · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    WTF? Who the hell rated that informative?

    --
    Some people encrypt by using rot-13 twice. I prefer the more secure method of using rot-1 a total of twenty six times.
  42. Second sharpest object catching up quickly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    The second sharpest object, Ann Coulter's cheek bones, seems to be getting more and more honed by the week. Those University of Alberta researchers better work quickly to keep the lead.

  43. Sharp, meet pointy. by EnsilZah · · Score: 1

    I don't know, i just can't think of a tack as sharp.
    When i think 'sharp' i think razor blades, maybe a scalpal, something with an edge, not a point.
    For things like tacks and needles i prefer the term 'pointy'.

  44. Re:rubbish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Neither have you I guess...

  45. Okay a needle....useful? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What would be a legitimate use for such a thing?

    Now if they could make the worlds sharpest blade...

  46. Now if only... by supra · · Score: 1

    ...I can get my lownmower blade to be that sharp...

    --
    On a computer or under a hood.
    1. Re:Now if only... by BigCheese · · Score: 1

      If your lawnmower was that sharp you could mow down fire hydrants.

      Wait, that would be cool! Now I want one.

      --
      The obscure we see eventually. The completely obvious, it seems, takes longer. - Edward R. Murrow
  47. Scanning Tunneling Electron Microscope by florescent_beige · · Score: 3, Informative

    The STM uses a stylus with a single-atom tip and is about a decade old. IIRC it's a carbon atom.

    --
    Equine Mammals Are Considerably Smaller
    1. Re:Scanning Tunneling Electron Microscope by Jandar0 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually the Scanning Tunneling Microscope does not demand a single-atom tip (in the sense considered here). Rather, a reasonably sharp apex will have one atom which is slightly closer to the surface than its neighbors from which most of the electron tunneling takes place. A tip with a radius of curvature less than, say, 100 nanometers is generally sufficient for most STM usage. Problems can arise when the tip has multiple protrusions which are a roughly equal distance from the surface, especially when scanning larger surface features such as carbon nanotubes (as compared to an atomically flat surface).

      That said, better tips mean better images, especially with larger surface features, and also lower field emission voltages, which means applications in electron microscopy and even flat-panel display technology.

      That said, I've make single-atom tips (of the sort discussed in this article) in the lab on a regular basis over the past several years with an ion sputtering-based process, a technique that is not limited to tungsten (tungsten is hard, but oxidizes, meaning the tip will not withstand removal from an ultra-high vacuum environment). This is a very interesting technique, but claiming it to be the sharpest object ever made is certainly overstating the achievement.

    2. Re:Scanning Tunneling Electron Microscope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was thinking the exact same thing. Electrochemical etching gets a pretty darn sharp tip, as I recall.

    3. Re:Scanning Tunneling Electron Microscope by smellsofbikes · · Score: 1

      The STM/AFM tips we used to use were done by electroetching in sodium hydroxide. They were pretty damn sharp and they were cheap and fast. I just made one last night, by mistake, when I thought the stainless steel wire I grabbed to use as an electrical connection to something I was anodizing, was actually aluminum. The steel etched down to points so sharp I couldn't feel them until after I was bleeding.

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
  48. Buck Rogers by McD!ck · · Score: 1

    Reminds me of playing Buck Rogers Countdown to Doomsday and weilding a Nano Sword.

    --
    People who are against human cloning must be bitter they are not good enough to be cloned.
  49. Super thin. by Soygen · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's the greatest thing since atomically-thin sliced bread.

  50. Re:Obligatory... by DeionXxX · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I belive it should be:

    Sharper than yo momma's KNEES.

  51. But... by NickeB · · Score: 3, Funny

    Can it cut through armor and still slice a tomato?

    1. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You wouldn't be able to cut through armor, or a tomato, unless they fashioned a "blade" one atom thick.

      You could just poke someone to death with it though.

  52. Oblig - by caffeinatedOnline · · Score: 4, Funny

    I for one welcome our new chemically assisted spatially controlled field evaporated tip overlords... hmmm... that doesn't roll off the tongue well, now does it?

    --
    The sky above the port was the color of television, tuned to a dead channel...
    1. Re:Oblig - by Martin+Blank · · Score: 4, Funny

      No, but it does sound more terrifying. Big words scare people.

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
    2. Re:Oblig - by samkass · · Score: 1

      In Soviet Russia, the chemically assisted spatially controlled field tip evaporates YOU!

      --
      E pluribus unum
  53. Um, Yeah, That's Funny... by Doomedsnowball · · Score: 4, Funny

    From TFA: These sharp tips are needed for making contact with metals or semiconductors as well as for the manipulation and examination of atoms, molecules and small particles. Ultrafine tips are demanded for future experiments where the results are directly dependent on shape of the tip.

    This is HUGE news in the nano scanning tunnel microscope world! Combined with the ability to determine an electrons spin, this could really open up new research results in a lot of fields. Good to see so many comedians on /. Lotta sharp wits.

    --
    7h3$3 4r3n'7 7h3 Ðr01Ð$ ¥0 4r3 £00|{1n9 f0r. M0v3 4£0n9. --OB1
    1. Re:Um, Yeah, That's Funny... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "This is HUGE news in the nano scanning tunnel microscope world! "

      would that mean bad news in the nano world?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Um, Yeah, That's Funny... by 27,000 · · Score: 0

      'Breakthrough in Microscope Manufacturing Technology' - accurate, but suitable for our consumption? How dare you, sir, imply /. be used for Serious Business!

      Er, with an article tited 'The Sharpest Object Ever Made', what can you expect? It's begging for it.

      --
      My problem with spontaneous human combustion is that never seems to happen to the "right" people.
  54. Act Now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And we'll throw in this rubber jar opener. Operators are standing by...

  55. I remember.. by Ricken · · Score: 1

    When I was a kid I used to think that if my sword was sharpened enough so that there would only be 1 atom at the tip, it would be as sharp as the anti-robocop-ninjas' swords.
    Umm, how sharp exactly is this thing? Does it cut through steel easily? Or is it like, too soft?

  56. got one!!! by JaJ_D · · Score: 1

    *waves it around*

    *drops it on desk*

    Ah crap, anyone got a spare one.... ;-]

    Jaj
  57. Sharper than my +5 Vorpal Sword? by elrous0 · · Score: 3, Funny
    Sure, this tip is sharp. But keep in mind that it's NOT made of silver. It won't do JACK against the undead.

    -Eric

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:Sharper than my +5 Vorpal Sword? by Brian+Boitano · · Score: 1

      You're right, it won't do anything to the undead, except chop them into tiny pieces.

      --
      What would Brian Boitano do?
    2. Re:Sharper than my +5 Vorpal Sword? by Sinbios · · Score: 5, Funny

      Why the HELL is this modded Insightful.

      --
      Anyone can "stand up for what they believe", but it takes a very brave individual to change what they believe. - Loundry
    3. Re:Sharper than my +5 Vorpal Sword? by teslar · · Score: 1

      Well, someone clearly has enough problems with the undead to mod you insightful.... thank God you stopped them from trying this tip on their enemies... you may have saved many lives!

    4. Re:Sharper than my +5 Vorpal Sword? by 27,000 · · Score: 0

      Today is backwards day. I fear I may lose all this bad karma I've worked so hard for.

      --
      My problem with spontaneous human combustion is that never seems to happen to the "right" people.
    5. Re:Sharper than my +5 Vorpal Sword? by lymond01 · · Score: 1

      Yes, but magic works against the undead as well and, as we know, magic is generally just misunderstood science. Swing away.

    6. Re:Sharper than my +5 Vorpal Sword? by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 4, Funny

      Why the hell was THAT modded Insightful?

      --
      This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
    7. Re:Sharper than my +5 Vorpal Sword? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      WTF is so insightful about this?

    8. Re:Sharper than my +5 Vorpal Sword? by creepynut · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why the hell is this NOT modded insightful?

    9. Re:Sharper than my +5 Vorpal Sword? by IdahoEv · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Anyone else here detect a misuse of the mod system?

      --
      I stole this sig from someone cleverer than me.
    10. Re:Sharper than my +5 Vorpal Sword? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Interviewer: Is it true that vampires like yourself can be killed with a simple wooden stake?
      Vampire: A wooden stake in the heart kills regular folks too, you know.

    11. Re:Sharper than my +5 Vorpal Sword? by CthulhuDreamer · · Score: 2, Funny

      I remember when Vorpal Swords were stuck at +3. Dang kids and their new toys...

    12. Re:Sharper than my +5 Vorpal Sword? by idangazit · · Score: 1

      Why the hell? ;)

    13. Re:Sharper than my +5 Vorpal Sword? by Joebert · · Score: 1

      The undead found a way to beat death, do you honestly think being chopped into tiny pieces is going to do anything other than piss them off ?

      --
      Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
    14. Re:Sharper than my +5 Vorpal Sword? by Drooling+Iguana · · Score: 1

      So, in otherwords, today is actually forwards day?

      --
      ... I'm addicted to placebos
    15. Re:Sharper than my +5 Vorpal Sword? by shadowbearer · · Score: 1


        Now you've done it, you've created a space-time moderation vortex. Hopefully only slashdot will implode...

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    16. Re:Sharper than my +5 Vorpal Sword? by bky1701 · · Score: 1

      Why is THAT rated offtopic???

    17. Re:Sharper than my +5 Vorpal Sword? by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Angry kibbles do not sound very dangerous to me.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    18. Re:Sharper than my +5 Vorpal Sword? by Wes+Janson · · Score: 1

      Why the hell can't this joke come to an end?

    19. Re:Sharper than my +5 Vorpal Sword? by creepynut · · Score: 1

      Because karma whoring is fun!

  58. And the point would be? by raalynthslair · · Score: 0

    And what would be the point of having a 1-atom wide object again? Let's face it, it's not practical or excessively useful to us (Ok, don't rant about "future potential" of this just yet... Really now? Do you think that this will REALLY make a significant difference in anything, other than the bragging rights of those that made this "breakthrough"...) More imporant in my mind isn't the sharpness but the hardness. If it is sharp enough to slice through anything in existence but has the rigidity and frailty of, say, an egg-shell... it'd be useless anyway. ^_^ Again, I ask (with full pun intended), "What's the point?"

    --
    -- "You must be the change you desire to see in the world." Mahatma Gandhi --
  59. Noo.... by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 1

    That would be my wit.

    --
    If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
  60. Nemesis from Alpha Flight/Marvel Comics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Looks like science is once again catching up with comic books. There was a character in the Alpha Flight series that had a sword that was 1 atom thick and could cut through anything by just pushing the molecules apart.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nemesis_(Marvel_Comic s)

  61. or how about... by WheresMyDingo · · Score: 4, Funny

    "sharp as SOAP" where SOAP is Sharpest Object At Present. Then even if something sharper comes along, you don't have to change your phrase, because it is so highly abstracted from the hardware that it hardly means anything anymore.

  62. The Real question is .... by ems2004 · · Score: 0

    Does it run Linux?

    --
    ..... best things in life are not so free..........
  63. I hope it's guarded well by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 5, Funny

    The dullest object ever made is being kept safe in the Oval Office.

    1. Re:I hope it's guarded well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stored next to the second dullest object:

      Your sense of humor.

      Mod Retard if there was such a thing.

    2. Re:I hope it's guarded well by steveo777 · · Score: 1
      Bob Dole doesn't typically appear in the oval office all that often...

      Please see Family guy episode #211 Mr. Griffon Goes to Washington if you don't understand the joke.

      --
      This sig isn't original enough, it's time to come up with something witty...
  64. My Dad always told me by dl107227 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    That a fart was the sharpest thing in the world. It can cut through a pair of pants without leaving a hole.

  65. A Fart by The_Fallguy · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I thought the sharpest thing in the world was a fart. It goes through your pants without leaving a hole.

  66. "sharp as a tack" does not imply all that sharp... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is everybody that culturally ignant?

    "sharp as a tack" has evolved into a tongue-in-cheek comment or even a back-handed compliment that implies somebody/something is clever but not all that clever since, as we all know, tacks are sharp but not all that sharp. think about it...needles are sharp and needle-sharp definitely implies smarts...same with razor...tacks aren't even in the same league.

    kind of like all the folks commenting that they never have really grokked the phrase since tacks aren't all that sharp.

    proof, meet puddin'

  67. This is so exciting... by GigG · · Score: 1

    This is so exciting. I'm just on pins and single atom tip formed by chemically assisted spatially controlled field evaporations waiting to hear more about it.

    --
    Is buying a Harley Davidson as your first motorcycle since you were 16 at age 49 a midlife crisis issue?
  68. Nice extension of current work by Mecroscope · · Score: 1

    I think the thing that most people missed here is that the single or several atom tips isn't necessarily even the most interesting achievement, tips as small as 3 atoms, or unstable 1 atom tips have been routinely observed up to this point. The high aspect ratio of these tips though is pretty incredible, a lot of FIM based tips are pretty blunt, but with pointy tips. For STM that doesn't matter so much as the tip apex is the crucial part, but for other imaging techniques like atomic force microscopy, using fat tips is like trying to play a record with a basketball instead of a needle.

  69. Not the first by mnmn · · Score: 1

    I remember vividly of an IBM project where they created the sharpest object with an atom tip, and they didnt even have to coat it in nitrogen.

    Posted on slashdot about a year ago. Its a dupe at the U of Alberta. Wake me when they use a Hydrogen atom at the tip, with an accentuated electron orbit which adds a sharper 'tip'.

    --
    "Give orange me give eat orange me eat orange give me eat orange give me you." -Nim Chimpsky
  70. OT - those link underline ads by chrisbtoo · · Score: 1

    Does anybody else find those little pop-up ads that appear when you hover over the green double-underlined text to be about the shittest invention ever?

    Those in the article seem to be from someone called ContentLink, but I've also seen them done by IntelliTXT. Their idea of context is usually so wrong as to be laughable. For example, in that article, the sentence "Technically speaking, they were able to coat peripheral atoms near the peak with nitrogen, making it a one atom-thick, tough protective paint job" has _nitrogen_ offering to inflate my car tyres with nitrogen, and _job_ offering a job search.

    Stop the madness!

    --
    Registering accounts later than some other chrisb since 1997
    1. Re:OT - those link underline ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Use Firefox and Adblock plus. It also removed less iritating ads, but that's the price they pay for using such shitty tech as to drive me towards adblock.

    2. Re:OT - those link underline ads by chrisbtoo · · Score: 1

      You, sir or madam, are my hero.

      Crappy ads, I shall miss you!

      --
      Registering accounts later than some other chrisb since 1997
  71. What will it be used for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why did they make this sharp object?

    1. Re:What will it be used for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RTFA

  72. So how much longer... by HumanisticJones · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    till I get that mono-sword my ShadowRun character used to sport all the time? I'm really jonesing for some snacks and its dangerous out there on the streets what with all the Riggers, Runners, and Street Samurai.

  73. Coming soon... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...dildos for ants!

  74. Snicker-snack! by tehshen · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Good against Jabberwocks, though.

    --
    Guy asked me for a quarter for a cup of coffee. So I bit him.
    1. Re:Snicker-snack! by Sartak · · Score: 1

      You misspelled Jabberwocky. :/

  75. Troll?!? by geekoid · · Score: 1

    Man, that was funny.

    And it would be funny no matter who was in office. It just happens that this time it's true!

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  76. That's a close shave by RuneSpyder · · Score: 1

    Great, now my face can resemble Nicholas Cage's from Face/Off when I shave with the new Gilette 10-bladed razor made from this stuff.

  77. Sharper than my ex-wifes's tongue? by zaphod_es · · Score: 1

    Now that is scary!

  78. thanks by popsicle67 · · Score: 1

    I have been tearing my hair out for 10 years now. I read Snowcrash in 95 in the waiting room of the hospital where my first daughter was born when the nurses kicked me out from time to time. I got to a part about some robot dog when the book disappeared and I couldn't remember the name or author.

  79. Harmless. by geekoid · · Score: 1

    unfortunatly, a sword 1 atom wide would be mostly harmless.
    The atoms it's moving through would just re-bond behind it.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  80. One-atom tips are routinely made by Animats · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The business end of a scanning tunneling microscope is often a one-atom tip. Those are made by cutting a wire of some suitable metal (tungsten, or platinum/iridium), hoping to get a sharp tip. Such tips look like this. As you can see, sometimes the break gives you a very sharp one-atom point, but the area around it is ragged.

    The technology for making these tips is embarassingly simple.

    Electrochemical etching is used to make better-formed STM tips. Electrochemical etching with STM feedback to determine when the best form has been reached does even better.

    1. Re:One-atom tips are routinely made by solitas · · Score: 1

      If the article's author believes that a single-atom emitter will work better in a field-emission SEM then he's in for a disappointment. The maximum amount of current you'd get off a single-atom tip is 'way too low to give you any kind of decent image at all once it gets through all the lensing- and forming-fields in a SEM column.

      Anyone who has managed an such instrument (I've run C&W Quikscans and Hitachi 4000 series) probably knows more about tip dynamics than he does - tips are not stable, tips erode (the current density obviously is quite high) - they build up layers of gas/contaminant molecules that ultimately form the sharp 'almost-single-atom' tips that account for proper, stable, low-noise imaging. An 'ultimate-sharp' (i.e. single-atom of ANYTHING) tip is just too unstable to be useful.

      Manufactured tips can be TOO sharp and require rather high-current conditioning ('high' compared to normal operating current) to sufficiently blunt the tips to get them in an acceptably stable range.

      Ultra-sharp tips may be required for high-res scanning-tunneling microscopy (most of what I've done is tapping-mode, lateral-force, and nanoindentation - DI, now Veeco stuff) but that's an entirely different animal from electron microscopy.

      --
      "It's time to take life by the cans." ~ Bender ("Bendin' in the Wind", ep. 3-13)
  81. Are you crazy? by geekoid · · Score: 1

    it's not the lost Ginsu technology.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  82. Batman of the Future by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

    Funny you mention swords. In the TV show "Batman of the Future" there's this assassin girl called Curare, whose sword had an edge 1 atom thick and could slash through any material known to man.

    My only question is... with a sword so sharp, why the heck doesn't the sword sheathe break apart? Does it have a one atom thick clip or what?

    1. Re:Batman of the Future by Sabaki · · Score: 1

      Batman Beyond, right?

      The sheath wouldn't have to have any magical strength -- it would just have to prevent the edge from hitting the back -- the rest of the sword isn't one atom thick. It could work as a wedge so that the edge never touches the sheath. (It makes sense for regular sheaths to do this as well, to avoid dulling.)

    2. Re:Batman of the Future by Mozk · · Score: 1

      Haha I remember watching that.

      --
      No existe.
  83. I'll be impressed... by Dannon · · Score: 1

    ...when they devise something that's sharper than the tongue of an angry woman.

    And when they do, I want to be somewhere far, far away.

    --
    Good judgment comes from experience.
    Experience comes from bad judgment.
  84. Imagine a Beowulf cluster made from these. by rbowles · · Score: 1

    EOM

    --
    /* MAGIC THEATRE
    ENTRANCE NOT FOR EVERYBODY
    MADMEN ONLY */
  85. yay by indy_Muad'Dib · · Score: 1

    now i can make LPs that much smaller since the track wont have to be as wide.

  86. Not sharp enough! by RichDiesal · · Score: 3, Funny

    It won't be sharp enough until I can swing the knife in midair, splitting atoms along the way, with a ripple of nuclear fusion in my wake.

    Mad scientists of the world (and Canada), unite to make my dreams come true!!!

    1. Re:Not sharp enough! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [Mad scientists of the world (and Canada), unite to make my dreams come true!!!]

      to achieve your dreams, know first that Canada is already a part of the world.

    2. Re:Not sharp enough! by d3ac0n · · Score: 1

      Wait. Wouldn't that be Nuclear Fission? Since you are splitting the atoms, not joining them.

      And since the tip of this thing is 1 atom wide, can you split more than 1 atom with this before the tip is worn down?

      --
      Official Heretic from the "Church of Global Warming". Proven right thanks to whistle blowers. AGW = Flat Earth Theory
    3. Re:Not sharp enough! by Surt · · Score: 1

      I think if you're splitting atoms, that's a wake of nuclear fission, unless you were expecting them to re-fuse afterward, which is comparatively unlikely.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
  87. Re:rubbish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This was a joke? I don't get it.

  88. How close does a katana come to this? by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 4, Interesting

    When a master sharpens a katana to the best standards of the art, the last step involves a polishing compound so fine that it has to be kept in water so it doesn't fall apart, and the edge is so thin you can see through the metal. (Yes, this process costs as much as a computer).

    Googlespace, on my first few searches, didn't turn up any numbers for the edge of a katana. It's bound to be a long way from a single atom, but it would be fun to know just how close or far it is.

    1. Re:How close does a katana come to this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the edge is so thin you can see through the metal

      Bullshit.

    2. Re:How close does a katana come to this? by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 1

      >edge is so thin you can see through the metal.

      Saw that once in an article about a professional polisher, but I'm not finding a citation online.

      Is it reasonable quantitatively? Telescope mirrors are proof that you can polish things to tolerances within a fraction of a wavelength of light, but that's removing only one side of the material. To make an edge thinner than a wavelength of light you'd have to avoid breaking the edge while you were working on it, which is a tall order for a manual process.

      Anyone with a professionally polished katana want to comment? I'd take your word as definitive, not that I usually argue with people who have katanas anyway.

  89. summary by rocketjam · · Score: 1

    Nice cut 'n paste summary of the article.

  90. Not really by Moraelin · · Score: 4, Informative

    I'll assume that they'll (eventually) going to make the tip or edge or whatever out of some cristalline metal. In which case, not really.

    Let's first define "sharp". No object in the world is a perfect edge ending in a clean zero-width edge. All knives, pins, etc, have a tip that, under a powerful enough microscope looks "blunt". What you'd see would be something like a pretty rounded "tip". What makes it "sharp" is that it's a very small surface.

    In other words, imagine two cones, both ending up in a bit of a section of a sphere. Except one is a 0.01 inch radius and the other is a 1 inch radius. What makes the first one sharp and the other one blunt? Pressure. Pressure equals force divided by surface. The surface rises with the square of that radius. So the first one needs 10,000 times less force to produce the same pressure. You can create enough pressure with your thumb to push a tack's small tip through wood, but you'd need an industrial press if you wanted to push a 1 inch steel ball into wood.

    In other words what makes something sharp is simply having a small enough tip. You need the same pressure to break through a given material. Having a smaller tip just means you can reach that pressure with less force. At some point you need very little force, and at that point we consider the object to be "very sharp".

    How does that help us here? Let's say you had such a pyramid, and let's say you managed to break off the atom at the tip. So now you have a "blunt" tip that's made of a 2x2 atom square. That's still _incredibly_ sharp. It's million times smaller than the tip of a tack or pin, hence it would need accordingly less force to push through the material of your choice.

    In other words, forget about breaking off an atom. You'd coukd lose _thousands_ of layers from that tip and still count as sharp.

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    1. Re:Not really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Although... if you were counting on *knowing* just how "sharp" the tip was for - say - calibration of measurements made with said "sharp" tip, and that one atom slipped off half-way through your measurement, leaving you with a 2x2 atom wide surface, that just might mess up your experimental results a tad.

      Think about the joys of used AFM probes. Scan the sample once, scan it 2x, notice the difference.

    2. Re:Not really by RedBear · · Score: 4, Interesting

      In other words, imagine two cones, both ending up in a bit of a section of a sphere. Except one is a 0.01 inch radius and the other is a 1 inch radius. What makes the first one sharp and the other one blunt? Pressure. Pressure equals force divided by surface. The surface rises with the square of that radius. So the first one needs 10,000 times less force to produce the same pressure. You can create enough pressure with your thumb to push a tack's small tip through wood, but you'd need an industrial press if you wanted to push a 1 inch steel ball into wood.


      There should be a special moderation category for this kind of comment: "Score: 5, Excellent example of why Slashdot kicks Digg's ass and gets read religiously every day by hundreds of thousands of geeks even though the actual articles often suck".

      I am less and less impressed every time some twit actually compares sites like Digg to Slashdot, as if they have anything in common besides posting links to geeky articles. I come to Slashdot every day to get insights from commenters who are more intelligent or more well informed than myself. I can pretty much be assured that, no matter what the subject of the article, if I read enough posts I will come away with a well-rounded understanding of it based on seeing several different well-written viewpoints.

      Thank you for a very interesting post.

    3. Re:Not really by cljudge · · Score: 1

      Great explanation of what is meant by "sharp" and it's in line with the original article. However, it seems to me that the phrase "sharp as a tack" usually means something more like "really smart" as in "That G. Dubbya is not sharp as a tack." See also "not the sharpest tool in the shed."

      This got me to thinkin' about the parallels between various definitions of "sharp." The basic idea expressed by Moraelin works for the other definitions as well:

      Sharp = Smart: People with pointy heads penetrate dense concepts with a lower expenditure of energy.

      Sharp = Pungent (e.g. cheese): Cheese with pointy flavors pierce flavor threshold so that smaller hunk of cheese satifies such hankerings.

      Sharp = Stylish: Enhancements to visual appearance get you into hot girl's/boy's pants without expending as many sleeping pills.

      Seems like "sharp" basically means "effective" in these cases.

      --
      cjudge
  91. Sharp IS pointy. by geekoid · · Score: 1

    sharp Audio pronunciation of "sharp" ( P ) Pronunciation Key (shärp)
    adj. sharper, sharpest

          1. Having a thin edge or a fine point suitable for or capable of cutting or piercing.

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    pointy Audio pronunciation of "pointy" ( P ) Pronunciation Key (point)
    adj. pointier, pointiest

            Having an end tapering to a point.
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    Something pointy can be dull or sharp, like an edge can be dull or sharp.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  92. OT: related question by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 2, Funny

    What's the dullest object ever made?

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
    1. Re:OT: related question by Winlin · · Score: 1

      Thanksgiving dinner at my grandparents' house

    2. Re:OT: related question by geekoid · · Score: 2, Funny

      *Looks toward white house*...naw, too damn easy.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:OT: related question by Surt · · Score: 1

      What's the dullest object ever made?
      I've been having a hard time this afternoon cutting bread for my lunch with a ball of silly putty.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    4. Re:OT: related question by smellsofbikes · · Score: 1

      Vacuum. Or Paris Hilton. You decide. (You can even decide if there's any difference between the answers. Be sure to show your work.)

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
    5. Re:OT: related question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      What's the dullest object ever made?

      Depends on who you ask.

      Ask a girl, she'll say "someone who reads Slashdot."

      Ask a slashdot user? You'll get "Slashdot editors."

      An editor will tell you, "Life outside Slashdot."

    6. Re:OT: related question by Alsee · · Score: 1

      Slashdot: Ask a silly question, get a rediculously detailed and scientifically precise answer.

      What's the dullest object ever made?

      Presuming you mean human made, that would be the gyroscope sphere for the Gravity Probe B satallite. It is a 1.5 inch diameter sphere of laboratory-grown fused quartz. The fuzed quartz material is internally perfectly homogenous to a level of one part in a half million. The surface is covered in a microscopically thin layer superconducting niobium.

      And just how perfectly dull is the surface? Well... if this sphere were scaled up to the size of the planet earth, the tallest mountain would be less than 4 feet tall and the deepest ocean would be less than 4 feet deep.

      The only known duller surface in the universe would be the surface of a neutron star, where atoms themselves melt and flow under the intense gravity.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  93. Cooking by Some_Llama · · Score: 1

    When cooking it is necessary to have the sharpest knives you can because this (counter-intuitively) is actually safer.

    IF you had a knife with a single atom edge, how long would that last, and how would you re-sharpen it?

    I started thinking about this in regards to cooking but for any application how would you keep this sharp?

    1 atom? wouldn't that be sheared off during the first use?

    I would assume a pyramid form, 1 atom supported by 2 or 3 underneath it and those supported by 6 and so on, even up to 5000 atoms would be "sharp" but how would you ever get back to 1?

  94. Arrowheads? by sootman · · Score: 1
    I've heard that when things like obsidian and glass break (or are chipped away, as in the creation of arrowheads) that the edge can be a single atom wide. (Or, I guess, molecule.) Quoth Wikipeida:
    "Obsidian is currently used in cardiac surgery, as well-crafted obsidian blades have a cutting edge much sharper than high-quality steel surgical scalpels and may even be up to five times sharper, the edge of the blade reaching veritable molecular thinness."
    I wonder how close 'veritable' is to 'actual'?
    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  95. Nope, not the sharpest by SnarfQuest · · Score: 1

    I have it on good authority (mother), that the sharpest object is a pair of sizzers in the hands of a running child. They are capable of poking out an eye at over three hundred feet.

    --
    Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
  96. Oh, THAT kind of "sharp"... by jpellino · · Score: 1

    Cuz I was kinda thinking it was gonna be a tie between a Ferrari 365 GTS/4 Daytona Spyder and Morris Day.

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
  97. Atom Wire Fibre Wire by CYDVicious · · Score: 1

    Imagine a new tool that instead of fibre wire, it uses these as an "atom wire"..

    Just think of the uses...
    -Cutting a block of cheese
    -Chopping down trees
    -Invisible clothesline for an unsuspecting target, with an effect similar to the lasers in Resident Evil

    ~CYD

    --
    //Nothing to see here, please move along.
  98. What's the point? by Sippan · · Score: 0

    What a sharp wit.

    Groan.

    --
    Frog blast the vent core.
  99. I won't be impressed... by VickiM · · Score: 1

    I won't be impressed until they've sharpened it on silk, spider threads, and sunlight.

  100. Fusion or Fission? by JazzLad · · Score: 0

    I thought Fission was splitting . . .

    Heck, I could be wrong & am too lazy to google it :)

    --
    "If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear." - Every fascist, ever
  101. Fun and Games by DumbSwede · · Score: 1

    Its all fun and games until someone puts a Planaria's eye out!

  102. It's all fun and games.... by waerloggha · · Score: 1

    Until someone loses an eye working with it.

  103. But... by Cleggmeister · · Score: 1

    ...it's still not sufficient to get through the missus' "puff" pastry... :(

  104. simple way to not break the sheath. by jameskojiro · · Score: 0

    Make it so the sheath doesn't touch the one atom thick section, just has to touch the beveled part of the clamp to the sides of the sword.

    --
    Tsukasa: All I really want, is to be left alone...
  105. Ninja blade? by szrachen · · Score: 1

    Somehow I thought this would have something to do with a ninja's sword.

  106. Not the first time it has been done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Prehistoric man did this before with flint. Flint arrow heads and knives have been found that were only 1 atom across at the sharpest point. Although their methods may not have been as accurate they were still there first!

  107. for some reason... by AndyboyH · · Score: 1

    this made me remember the subtle knife from the 'His Dark Materials' trilogy...

    Don't go losing any fingers using it now!

    --
    Baka Drew
  108. Nope...not the sharpest... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A fart is still the sharpest thing in the world.....

    Goes through your pants without leaving a hole.

  109. First application by grumpyman · · Score: 1

    Introducing the new Ginzu 3000 with literally atomic cutting precision for your next dinner!

  110. Not as sharp as a fart by fuego451 · · Score: 1

    A fart can go through your pants without making a hole.

    I'm sorry. I couldn't help it. Noone else remembered this. OK, I'll go back to re-drywalling the bathroom now.

    Oh drudgery!

  111. Thanks! I thought it was a Ginsu knife! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I mean, man, they cut open a car's muffler with that knife!

    And then sliced a tomato!

    I have lost my faith in TV.....

  112. I call bullshit.... by Seraphim_72 · · Score: 1

    Everyone knows the sharpest thing in the world is a Mother-in-Law's tongue.

    --
    Slashdot, where armchair scientists get shouted down and armchair theologians get modded up.
    1. Re:I call bullshit.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Further proof that we need a "retarded" mod.

  113. Gabriel's Horn by emandres · · Score: 1

    Reminds of Gabriel's Horn in calculus. Basically, you rotate the area under y=1/x from 1 to infinity, creating something that looks much like a horn. I remember someone in my class mentioning that you could be holding and move it and be stabbing someone miles away (of course, it would be so small they wouldn't feel it). Also, it has finite volume, yet infinite surface area, so you could fill the horn with paint, but you could never paint the outside of it completely. Anyway, here's a link for more info.

    --
    The only way to tell the difference between a hamster and a gerbil is that the hamster has more white meat.
    1. Re:Gabriel's Horn by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Take paint.
      Shape it appling Gaberial's Horn.

      There, now you have enough paint.

      The great thing about the hrn is it involves pi..MMmmm pie...

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  114. Riiiiight by danpsmith · · Score: 1
    Now, thanks to new University of Alberta research, the popular expression might become, 'sharp as a single atom tip formed by chemically assisted spatially controlled field evaporation.'

    I can't imagine ever meeting anyone smart enough to warrant memorizing such a phrase.

    --
    Judges and senates have been bought for gold; Esteem and love were never to be sold.
  115. Re:rubbish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is compared to someone with a penis the size of a hydrogen atom

  116. Tacks aren't sharp by kjdames · · Score: 1

    What the heck? Tacks are not sharp at all. They are POINTY. If you could make a chain of these along the edge of something, then I guess you would have a really sharp object. But now it's just POINTY.

    --

    Typos... that's just how I role.

  117. Variable Sword by xPsi · · Score: 1

    Reminds me of a pre-technology leading to Larry Niven's Variable Swords from Ringworld. It "just" involves a statis field for stability and a little ball afixed on the tip so you know where the end of the sword is. Too bad the former's probably a show stopper -- for a while anyway.

    --
    i\hbar\dot{\psi}=\hat{H}\psi
  118. GURPS Supers by dangil · · Score: 1

    I remember playing GURPS Supers, and one character of ours had a monomolecular sword... very cool back in the day... but now.. REALITY !!

  119. At last... by andrewman327 · · Score: 1

    I want to mount one of these on the front of my car. Take that, deer!

    --
    Information wants a fueled airplane waiting at the hangar and no one gets hurt.
  120. razor by bumby · · Score: 1

    now these will make good razor blades!
    Gillette better watch out!

    --
    Hey! That's my sig you're smoking there!
  121. Units of sharpness? by ar1550 · · Score: 1

    Come on people, use standard units! How sharp is this point, in units of LEGOs per barefoot?

    (insert non-plural LEGO grammar nazi here)

    --
    I once shot a man in Reno 'cause they cancelled Firefly.
  122. University of Alberta in Edmonton by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The University of Alberta is located in the city of Edmonton, which is the capital city of the province of Alberta, Canada.

    Interestingly, this is also the same province which contains Calgary, which some people mistakenly think is the capital city. Edmonton in general (and the University of Alberta in particular) has a great track record of innovation and research. In addition, Edmonton is one of the prettiest cities you're likely to see, and far less testosterone-infused and brash than our cattle-fixated cousin to the south (Calgary).

    1. Re:University of Alberta in Edmonton by Pulse_Instance · · Score: 1

      If you are calling Edmonton one of the prettiest cities you're likely to see, you must be assuming that you will never leave Northern Alberta. If there were perhaps some mountains or a river that you could swim in then maybe it would increase largely on the scale of pretty but the river looks disgusting and the only slopes are the banks of the river valley. I've wanted to leave Edmonton for some time now but the amount of innovation that is happening in this city keeps me here, despite the fact that it is only marginally nicer looking than Winnepeg.

  123. What do you want for Xmas? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ralphie: I want a single atom tip formed by chemically assisted spatially controlled field evaporation with a compass in the stock!
    Mom: No, you'll poke your eye out!

  124. Now... by InvisibleSoul · · Score: 1

    Exactly when has the tack been the benchmark of sharpness?

  125. no joke! by chocolatetrumpet · · Score: 1

    The most convincing testimony to jurors is not a clear, honest explanation, but a whiz-bang over-your-head technical explanation that laypeople don't understand.

    Sad but true... can't recall source right now.

    --
    Spoon not. Fork, or fork not. There is no spoon.
  126. SOAP?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What does this have to do with Snakes On A Plane?!!

  127. lazy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I love lazy people who just copy and paste the first paragraph of the article and post that as thier summary.

  128. Excalibur! by alexgieg · · Score: 1

    Excalibur is sharper. At least in the Camelot 3000 comics.

    SPOILER: King Arthur literally cuts an atom with it. You see the tip of the blade (solid as ever) entering the atom and KABOOM! Nothing better than a fission bomb to kill Morgana Le Fey in a very, very definitive way.

    Oh, and BTW, the Excalibur itself survived the atomic explosion. And shining! It's not only a sharp sword, it's also a damn hard sword! I wonder how Lancelot managed to break it once...

    --
    Conservatism: (n.) love of the existing evils. Liberalism: (n.) desire to substitute new evils for the existing ones.
  129. Amen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mod parent up

  130. Bill Door wouldn't be happy by Centurix · · Score: 1

    Now there's something sharper than his infinitely sharp implement of Death...

    --
    Task Mangler
  131. Obsidian by Evil+Pete · · Score: 1

    This reminded me that prehistoric peoples were able to make obsidian blades with edges of molecular width. Though atomic thinness beats that I guess.

    --
    Bitter and proud of it.
  132. Reminds me of BGC and JOHNNY MNEMONIC by iamcf13 · · Score: 1

    In both works, items with 'monomolecular edges' were used as weapons:

    Linna Yamazaki's hardsuit 'battle ribbons' from BUBBLEGUM CRISIS

    http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0088863/

    Takahashi's 'garrote' wire from JOHNNY MNEMONIC

    http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0113481/

    Maybe one day they'll exist in the real world. But who would use them -- THEY ARE LETHAL!!! :P

  133. Sort of off topic, but in a good way by Rob+Nance · · Score: 1
    "If this works, and it remains to be proven, it would be like taking a modest car and making it go like a race car by just changing its spark plugs. We would take a conventional electron microscope, put in one of our tips as the electron source and render the microscope instantly improved and capable of finer resolution."
    This is the kind of real world application information all researchers and scientific media should be pushing on readers. This is very interesting to hear. If the article had just talked about this super sharp object the whole time, with no real world application tie in, the news would not be near as interesting. I think as funding dries up across all scientific fields, people are becoming more aware of the value of this. I wish NASA would take note and put some of their small resources into marketing their science. We need real world uses and people tooting their horns so to speak, when they do make breakthroughs in space research.
  134. Better be careful by Kelz · · Score: 1

    Someone could poke their eye out!

  135. Gotta love those car anologies... by mark-t · · Score: 1
    ...it would be like taking a modest car and making it go like a race car by just changing its spark plugs.
    Okay... but does it still take regular unleaded?
  136. A Tack By Any Other Name by jman.org · · Score: 1

    Would prick just as sharp.

  137. old sharp object joke by zen-theorist · · Score: 1

    now send this to the russians, and they'll drill a hole through it and send it back.

  138. You missed some by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I think that only covers number 5, below.

    Shamelessly stolen from dictionary.com:

    1. Intellectually weak or obtuse; stupid.
    2. Lacking responsiveness or alertness; insensitive.
    3. Dispirited; depressed.
    4. Not brisk or rapid; sluggish: Business is dull.
    5. Not having a sharp edge or point; blunt: a dull knife.
    6. Not intensely or keenly felt: a dull ache.
    7. Arousing no interest or curiosity; boring: a dull play.
    8. Not bright or vivid. Used of a color: a dull brown.
    9. Cloudy or overcast: a dull sky.
    10. Not clear or resonant: a dull thud.