Slashdot Mirror


Why Microsoft's Zune Scares Apple to the Core

BoredStiff writes "Computerworld has an article examining Microsoft's plans to launch a competitor to the Apple iPod, the wireless media player called Zune. The article lists five reasons why Apple may fear the Zune, and why it won't be as easily smacked down as the dozens of mp3 players before it have been. The Zune isn't just a music player, the article argues. Think of it as a portable, wireless, hardware version of MySpace. With the Zune, Microsoft is trying to launch a consumer media 'perfect storm.'" From the article: "Microsoft will make the movement of media between Windows, Soapbox and the Zune natural and seamless. The Zune interface is just like a miniature version of the Windows Media Center user interface and is very similar to some elements of Vista. Apple fans are overconfident in the iPod because Apple once commanded 92% of music player market share, a number that has since fallen to around 70%. About 30 million people own iPods. But Microsoft owns more than 90% of the worldwide operating systems market (compared with Apple's roughly 5%), representing some 300 million people. The company expects to have 200 million Vista users within two years."

574 comments

  1. Limited playback by nizo · · Score: 5, Funny

    Best of all, Zunes will be able to connect to one another wirelessly, letting people share songs (as well as playlists and .jpg photos) with up to four other simultaneous Zune users within Wi-Fi range. Recipients of these shared songs will be able to play them three times for up to three days free, after which they'll have to pay to listen. Songs received wirelessly can't be shared.


    While playing songs you got from other Zune users may be time limited, my guess is that if this is a typical Microsoft product, the goatse image you picked up from simply walking down the street will be nearly impossible to get rid of (both from your brain and your new Zune).

    1. Re:Limited playback by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While playing songs you got from other Zune users may be time limited, my guess is that if this is a typical Microsoft product, the goatse image you picked up from simply walking down the street will be nearly impossible to get rid of (both from your brain and your new Zune).

      Haha, the joke's on you. I deliberately walked down the street to get rid of the tubgirl image.

    2. Re:Limited playback by sryx · · Score: 5, Informative

      You know if you like the music sharing, but hate the DRM, there are other solutions. Check out Radio Mixtape. You can create play lists from full length MP3 audio files that artists designate (we even have Sub Pop's promotional catalog, something the Zune claims to come pre-loaded with). Mix tapes can be embedded in MySpace profiles as Flash Widgets, or Blogs as JavaScript widgets. Everything is free and information about downloads and sharing are provided back to the artist directly (and all "buy album" links are in direct control of the artists, some link to Amazon, some to thier own label others even to iTunes). It's free for artists and free for fans, and it works on absolutely every portable audio player. You don't need to sell your sole to Microsoft just to share good music. -Jason

    3. Re:Limited playback by caffeinatedOnline · · Score: 5, Funny

      You don't need to sell your sole to Microsoft just to share good music

      That's good to hear, cause as far as I am concerned MS is not getting any of my fish!!

      --
      The sky above the port was the color of television, tuned to a dead channel...
    4. Re:Limited playback by smidget2k4 · · Score: 5, Funny

      I was really confused as to why they would want the bottom of my shoe. I guess fish makes more sense. Learning something new on /. every day!

    5. Re:Limited playback by Ana10g · · Score: 1

      So that's the fucking audio files I can never seem to turn off fast enough when I visit MySpace profiles, eh?

      --
      just an analog boy living in a digital age.
    6. Re:Limited playback by orasio · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Stop it.
      Tubgirl is nothing of a mind scar compared to goatse.
      Goatse can only be compared, in the harm it inflicts, to an old coconut.jpg skat file that roamed the BBSs twelve years ago.
      My friends and I only had to say the word "coconut!" to gross out the other guy.

      Tubgirl is gross, but it doesn't burn in your brain. I think I don't even remember the picture right now.

    7. Re:Limited playback by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 4, Informative
      Apple fans are overconfident in the iPod because Apple once commanded 92% of music player market share, a number that has since fallen to around 70%.


      This is completely false. The author is confusing the iPod market share statistic for hard-drive based players--which is still 90% --and the statistic for all total portable music players, which is 70%. The precise history of the iPod's total market share is 31% in 2004, 65% in 2005, and 74% in 2006. The market was once dominated by flash players, but that was eradicated by the iPod mini. Contrary to the article's claim, the iPod has not lost any market share.

      About 30 million people own iPods. But Microsoft owns more than 90% of the worldwide operating systems market (compared with Apple's roughly 5%), representing some 300 million people.

      These have absolutely nothing to do with each other. It doesn't matter that Microsoft owns more than 90% of the worldwide operating systems market. That hasn't stopped the iPod in the last five years, despite a long series of "PlaysForSure" devices.

      The Zune has the same resolution as the iPod (the Zune's screen is a stretched 320x240), it's bulkier than the iPod, and its clickwheel isn't a clickwheel, so you have to use simple directional push-and-hold buttons to go through your 1,000+ music list.

      This is the latest "iPod killer" article that will be forgotten in a month. How many of these "killers" are we going to hear about before people wise up? Come on, one of the reasons listed in the article is "Zune is actually pretty cool." It's a fluff piece mixed with subjective op-ed from the author.
      --
      "Sufferin' succotash."
    8. Re:Limited playback by iamsolidsnk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Allow me to file this one with the rest of the so-called iPod killers.

      I get so many coworkers asking me about iPods at work for their children it's insane. Children, Teens, and young adults will be the driving force of this product industry. Right now, the iPod is cool, and no amount of MS money will take that away. As long as their friends have one, its tough sh!t MS. :P

      --
      Here I am, here I remain.
    9. Re:Limited playback by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How am I a "fan boy" because I point out goofiness like "Zune is really cool" as being a reason that Apple is "scared" of the iPod, or outright statistical falsehoods? Zune will have as much impact on the market as the Origami did--zilch.

      --
      "Sufferin' succotash."
    10. Re:Limited playback by maj1k · · Score: 0, Troll

      you're a fan boy because you're getting worked up about this.

    11. Re:Limited playback by supasam · · Score: 0, Troll

      Yeah! No one in his right mind would display passion if he wasn't an apple fan boy! Apple fan boys are stupid! Apple fan boys suck!!
      Nanny-nanny-boo-boo!

      WINDOWS MONOTONE FOR LIFE!!!!

      I mean:

      [windows monotone for li--BSOD]

      --


      Suck a lemon?
    12. Re:Limited playback by Orange+Crush · · Score: 1
      As long as their friends have one, its tough sh!t MS.

      Are you implying that teenagers are label snobs and liable to shun others for not going with what's popular!? I'm so telling the whole school. No one's gonna sit with you any more next lunch period.

    13. Re:Limited playback by Miguelito · · Score: 3, Insightful
      This is the latest "iPod killer" article that will be forgotten in a month. How many of these "killers" are we going to hear about before people wise up?

      Nothing will be an "iPod killer" until it's as simple to use and straightforward as the iPod is. By that, I mean that even the average parents and grandparents can (and do) use them. Yes, my parents each have their own iPod, my grandparents share one... they love them, and use them all the time without problems. The only other semi-complicated device to come out like this that I can say the same for is Tivo.

      Too many people, especially tech types, don't seem to get that it's the simplicity and intuitiveness of the iPod that has made it such a success. Yeah sure, most of us would love to have one device that does it all, but non technical people are too confused by things that try to do that. They want simple, and they want it done well. That's what Apple tapped into.

      Who knows? Maybe Zune will be that easy to use. But IME, the addition of all the extra stuff they're trying to push with the Zune will get in the way and confuse the moms, dads and grandparents, and will keep it from becoming as huge as iPods are.

      Oh, and yes, my dad even rips DVDs for his iPod. Which shocked even me.. all I had to do was point him to handbrake. He's otherwise completely clueless with computers (which is really sad considering he's worked with PBX phone systems his whole life and can do stuff on those blindfolded).
      --
      - My favorite error message: xscreensaver, running on an old Sparc 5 w/ 8bit color: bsod: Couldn't allocate color Blue
    14. Re:Limited playback by crashelite · · Score: 1

      also come equiped with brand new blue screen of death (also avalable in the color to match ur Zune: after mexican dinner Shit brown, apple white , and really bad attempt at grey black )

      --
      (yes i know i suck at spelling fell free to correct my grammar and/or spellin i dont care, im still not going to change
    15. Re:Limited playback by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 1

      I'm not getting "worked up" about anything.

      Next.

      --
      "Sufferin' succotash."
    16. Re:Limited playback by twofidyKidd · · Score: 3, Funny

      "These have absolutely nothing to do with each other. It doesn't matter that Microsoft owns more than 90% of the worldwide operating systems market. That hasn't stopped the iPod in the last five years, despite a long series of "PlaysForSure" devices."

      I completely agree with this. That would be like saying that no one should be using Adobe's Photoshop because Windows ships with MS Paint.

      --


      Hades, PoD: Official Advocate
    17. Re:Limited playback by slofstra · · Score: 1
      This article gets my vote for the most unconvincing column of the year. One seemingly small point is that the ipod works with a Windows PC, but a Zune won't work with a Mac. Part of Microsoft's problem is that they're glasses are always coloured Microsoft, which may help when you're in a monopoly position, but not here.

      On a potential market share basis it doesn't matter that Zune won't work with a Mac. But from a perception point of view it leaves Microsoft standing out in left field. Ipod and itunes are a 'de facto' standard, and for the Zune to sell, it should work with itunes and it should work with a Mac. And an ipod be supported by MS's new music service. If you can't bring on the device with that kind of interchangeability, the consumer won't buy it because the device is making life too complicated.

    18. Re:Limited playback by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      ipod are beginning to get the advantage that a huge market share gives.

      eg. my car stereo has an ipod connector on it. Not a zune connector. Therefore if I want a portable music player that's useful to me in my car I get an ipod (which suits me fine).

      Walk into any shop and it's full of ipod goods. There are other mp3 players around - but only ipod has the mindshare.

      Microsoft have been taking advantage of this kind of thing with windows for years - it's about time that they got a taste of it..

    19. Re:Limited playback by mike_elgan · · Score: 1

      My article never said Zune would "kill" the iPod. I'm saying Apple can't dismiss the Zune (and the coming Microsoft consumer media assault) as easily as the iPod fans out there who mock Microsoft's entry into the media player market.

      I'm just trying to dispell the myth that Zune's launch won't really affect Apple. It will. Profoundly.

      Mike Elgan

    20. Re:Limited playback by mike_elgan · · Score: 1

      *** These have absolutely nothing to do with each other. It doesn't matter that Microsoft owns more than 90% of the worldwide operating systems market. ***

      Here we have a legitimate difference of opinion.

      Everyone who thinks Microsoft won't leverage Windows to push Zune Marketplace and the Zune stand on that side of the room. Everyone who thinks they will, stand over here.

      Mike Elgan

    21. Re:Limited playback by mike_elgan · · Score: 1

      *** Right now, the iPod is cool, and no amount of MS money will take that away. ***

      I agree completely with that statement. How about this one:

      "Right now, the iPod is *profitable,* and no amount of MS money will take that away."

      Agree or disagree?

      That's the point of my article. Not that the Zune is "cooler" than the iPod, but that Zune is a problem for Apple.

      Mike Elgan

    22. Re:Limited playback by dfghjk · · Score: 1

      "This is the latest "iPod killer" article that will be forgotten in a month. How many of these "killers" are we going to hear about before people wise up? Come on, one of the reasons listed in the article is "Zune is actually pretty cool." It's a fluff piece mixed with subjective op-ed from the author."

      Yes, it is a fluff piece but not any different than fluff pieces we see that are pro-Apple. Selling a product on "coolness" is more an Apple thing after all.

      Regarding Windows marketshare, his point was that MS has a lot of leverage due to its dominant position with Windows. I agree that it doesn't matter. iTunes runs on Windows and iTS is more established than anything MS *will* do. MS's YouTube ripoff doesn't exist yet either. Apple should be concerned, though, since MS has the resources to put together a complete competitor and it has demonstrated that it doesn't mind losing money to win a market.

      The biggest differentiator is the WiFi. Sure it has a bigger screen but it's still small. Right now, most everyone that wants a player wants an iPod and knows how to use iTunes. MS has to overcome that and I'm not sure that the WiFi feature will overcome that. At least they have something no other iPod competitor has had.

    23. Re:Limited playback by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your second statement is easier to agree with than the first one. What was your point?

    24. Re:Limited playback by MyNameIsEarl · · Score: 1

      I'd rather teach them how to fish so no one in Redmond will ever go hungry.

    25. Re:Limited playback by MyNameIsEarl · · Score: 1

      So MS is going to use their monopoly to push their new music store and media player. Hmmmmm where have I heard that strategy before.

    26. Re:Limited playback by Al+Dimond · · Score: 1

      I thought the interchangeability was one of the things Microsoft was running away from with the Zune. Not allowing any other players to play its songs, not allowing PlaysForSure content on the Zune. They explicitly wanted a vertical solution like Apple has, thought that's what they thought they could sell. Well, even more vertical than Apple, since Apple can't ignore Windows. Time will tell.

      Microsoft can't bring a device with *iPod/iTunes* interchangeability; they couldn't if they wanted to, because Apple wouldn't let them. Apple and Microsoft, both making our lives complicated by trying to control every aspect of a market; who'da thunk it? The only reason Apple's solution as it is doesn't make people's lives more complicated is that most people pre-iTunes didn't have any DRM'ed music files that they couldn't move to other players. Microsoft in that sense has a big disadvantage starting second, even more so now than when they launched PlaysForSure, but PlaysForSure seemed to be aimed more at the techie-types that would appreciate the choice in players. Unfortunately many of them already were invested in iTunes songs. It seems like now they're trying to go after the large group of people that don't yet have a large investment in DRM'ed music, focusing away from the aspect of technical choice and entirely on the social aspects of the player. And for the early-adopters with lots of iTunes music (I think of them as "the suckers" but that's just me), I heard (early on) that MS was planning to offer free Zune versions of songs they had bought on iTunes. How they would obtain that information reliably without Apple's cooperation is a mystery to me, but that's their pitch.

      I think that having two companies trying hard to push their fully-vertical digital music solutions will show us that it's not Apple or Microsoft that make the whole thing so complicated, it's the DRM itself. And if DRM is necessary to prevent copyright from being shat upon then the cause is trying to combine the entrenched idea of copyright with the emerging idea of a social (read peer-to-peer, bazaar, grass-roots, as opposed to top-down, cathedral, marketing-driven) way of spreading musical tastes and computers, which excel at copying things. Zune seems to have an interesting idea about how to do that, but for it really to work well as they envision it they have to completely take over the market with their super-vertical system. Yay, interesting idea, boo, vertical monopoly.

    27. Re:Limited playback by IANAAC · · Score: 1
      By that, I mean that even the average parents and grandparents can (and do) use them. Yes, my parents each have their own iPod, my grandparents share one...

      Parents and grandparents are not the target consumer for any mp3 device, if you think about it. They're not the ones who buy the music that drives the industry. It's teens and college-age kids.

      Maybe in your dad's case he's ripping what he already owns, but I kind of doubt he's buying anywhere near the amount of music that either a teen or college kid buys.

    28. Re:Limited playback by badasscat · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm just trying to dispell the myth that Zune's launch won't really affect Apple. It will. Profoundly.

      That's an opinion, and as such, there's nothing "mythical" about the opposing point of view. You have your opinion, others disagree.

      I think the Zune will have basically zero effect on Apple or the iPod. I also think it will have a minimal effect on the market as a whole. This is not a "myth" because none of these events that would prove whether I'm right or wrong have happened yet. It is, simply, my opinion, just as yours is yours.

      There is nothing much different about the Zune than every other portable MP3 player to come along and challenge the iPod. It's not even the first big name trying an integrated experience. You apparently have forgotten the Sony "Network Walkman", which despite a long brand pedigree, a huge company behind it and a fully integrated end-to-end experience, fell flat on its face.

      The long and the short of it is nobody has proven they can beat Apple at their own game, and many have tried. What makes MS any different? The path to success in dethroning the iPod is not to try to do the same thing Apple does, only better, because that's not possible. It's like starting up a new car company and saying your goal is to outsell the Toyota Camry. You'll never do it.

      All anyone can do is try a completely different path. Cell phones, UMPC's, portable game machines, or whatever. None of these have so far been successful enough to put a dent in iPod sales either, but that's the only way the iPod's ever going down. Nobody's ever going to dethrone the iPod by making an iPod knockoff.

      I'm saying Apple can't dismiss the Zune (and the coming Microsoft consumer media assault) as easily as the iPod fans out there who mock Microsoft's entry into the media player market.

      You want to know another word for "iPod fans"?

      Consumers.

      They're the ones mocking Microsoft - the very people that buy portable mp3 players. You might want to take note of that fact.

    29. Re:Limited playback by ozmanjusri · · Score: 2, Interesting
      It's a fluff piece mixed with subjective op-ed from the author.

      To me it reads more like astroturf from a company desperately trying to generate some hype for a product which has received a "ho hum" response in the marketplace.

      Have a look around the traps - all the usual media whores are touting the "social and viral" benefits of the Zune, tenuously linking it to MySpace, YouTube etc. It's being pushed heavily in the blogosphere as well.

      So guys, how does it feel to be part of a marketing exercise?

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    30. Re:Limited playback by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "and the statistic for all total portable music players, which is 70%. "

      Ohhh my BS alarm is going crazy. Based on what? year over year sales? It cannot be installed user base, as there are WAY too many freaking 'portable music players' since the 1970s (transister radio, walkman, discman, disc based mp3 player) for me to believe that.

    31. Re:Limited playback by iluvcapra · · Score: 1

      What difference does it make what kind of music the owner buys, particularly if the margins are so thin on the songs? Apple makes all its profits on the devices themselves- you're paying money for portable listening, the content you put on it has always been of negligible interest to Apple, as long as you were listening to it on their hardware.

      The crossed purposes of the recording industry (pushing the hot new acts on the teenies) and hardware manufacturers (easy copying/sharing of content in particular) are well attested. What's good for Warner-Elektra-Atlantic is absolutely not what's good for Apple.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
    32. Re:Limited playback by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Hm... who do you think buys more music, the parent's basement dwelling geek or one of the college students I'll list under "other?" Despite the recent rumored coolness of being a geek, the cool kids still aren't particularly geeky. Kind of like Mom and Dad, ironically.

    33. Re:Limited playback by arminw · · Score: 1

      .....Everyone who thinks Microsoft won't leverage Windows......

      You made a mistake, -- you left out one word to mak your statement correct --

      Everyone who thinks Microsoft won't TRY to leverage Windows....

      --
      All theory is gray
    34. Re:Limited playback by lixee · · Score: 2, Funny

      It was Paul Simon's girlfriend shoe they were interrested in, not yours.

      --
      Res publica non dominetur
    35. Re:Limited playback by Technician · · Score: 1

      You know if you like the music sharing, but hate the DRM, there are other solutions.

      If you have an I-pod loaded with MP3,s instead of AAC files, connect it ot your Linux box with Banchee. It does more than just put files onto an I-pod. It extracts them so you can share with your I-pod. The trick it to keep in a format that is the common denominator between players. Incompatible formats such as Apple AAC, SONY ATRAC, Microsoft WMA and other files are simply incompatible between players. Most everything will play an MP3 and most players with the right software permit transfering from and to the players. Crossing format fences is an attempt in futility. Crossing DRM fences is even worse. Who needs a WMA file that won't play on a Plays for Sure player, or an AAC file that won't play on an I-pod? Stick with stuff that works and reject the broken files.

      For the Apple fans, I believe I-tunes player can rip CD's to MP3. Windows fans can use CDex or any number of CD rippers. Linux users will need to download the LAME encoder due to the MP3 lisence issues and use one of the Linux CD rippers.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    36. Re:Limited playback by atezun · · Score: 1

      I was really confused as to why they would want the bottom of my shoe.

      Hey, if Apple and Nike want it, why can't Microsoft?

    37. Re:Limited playback by peter+Payne · · Score: 0

      Right on. I mean, we *know* that "zig when your competition zags" and "wait for the next inevitible paradigm shift and take take advantage of it" (i.e. from DOS to Windows, which is why we all use Excel now and now 1-2-3) are spot-on. I'd add "add features that people will want" and "remove all possible downsides to your product" to the list.

      If Zune was

      a) a hard drive player that did everything the iPod did without lack
      b) maybe, added some "maybe not perfect, but certainly not bad to have" features like video in the iPod with Video
      c) maybe, um, threw their existing Windows Mobile platform into the platform, letting us run some software apps from that platform, and maybe allowing devs to come up with a "killer app" that will help them along

      it might do better. Currently, being larger, less well designed, and having any significant downsides (like, I can't take my iTMS music with me, I can't use it on my Mac, I can't use it with iTuens) is, well, a deal breaker for anyone with a brain.

      I don't know this of course. Maybe there's a lot of pent-up demand for a brown device out there, who knows. In the meantime, I've told my stockbroker to sell MSFT. The "Microsoft is going to lost $50 per unit sold" factor pushed me over the top.

      --
      You've got a friend in Japan: http://www.jlist.com
    38. Re:Limited playback by Shihar · · Score: 1

      Nothing will be an "iPod killer" until it's as simple to use and straightforward as the iPod is.

      I don't believe this for a second. The iPod is not trashing everyone else in the market just because the iPod has a slick simple to use interface. Other Mp3 players have great interfaces too. The Creative Zen for instance has an interface that (in my opinion) trashes the iPods. I am certain that other MP3 players out there are also likewise good. At this point it doesn't matter how good the interface in your MP3 player is, the iPod is going to thrash your product. The iPod already created a 'perfect marketing storm' and is currently sailing high on its success from a few years ago.

      The MP3 market was very immature when Apple stepped in. Apple stepped into an immature market with an product bundle (both the slick iPod AND iTunes) and marketing and PR power that other MP3 players couldn't even begin to compete with. Apple pretty quickly hit critical mass and snatched up the entire immature market before anyone had a chance to defend themselves from the Apple takeover.

      Apple is now just riding out its earlier success. The iPod is almost synonymous with MP3 player. Hell, when my mother went to buy my little brother an MP3 player for his birthday she got an iPod. She didn't get it because it was the "best", she got it because she didn't even realize that there were other options. She knew an iPod was "cool" and played music. It didn't even cross her non-techie mind that there might be better MP3 players out there for less.

      At this point in the game, it doesn't matter how good your product is; you stand absolutely no chance against the critical mass and the marketing machine that is the iPod. Not only do you need to offer a superior and better looking product at a competitive price to beat Apple, but you also need to at least compete with them in terms of marketing. When I say marketing, I don't simply mean commercials black and white dancing Bono's and what not, but also from the pop culture marketing that Apple has managed to tap into. People buy iPods not just because of TV commercials, but also because their friends have one.

      All of this said, I do think that Apple is eventually going to have a real battle on its hands. As Apple competes, it teaches. People now realize that their MP3 player not only has to be functional, but slick looking. The interface now has to not only be functional, but at least as slick as the iPod's. Apple has even taught its competitors how to market their products. I would be money that future iPod competitors launch advertisements implying that iPods are not cool because everyone else has them. iPod competitors are going to wade into the pop culture wars in an attempt to dethrone Apple.

      Granted, I know nothing of the Zune and how effective Microsoft is at marketing, but if anyone has the money and the drive to battle Apple, Microsoft is probably it. Throw in that Microsoft has one hook already in by controlling the OS (think Netscape Vs IE), and I think that Microsoft is a contender if they don't much up on having a functional product.

    39. Re:Limited playback by beren12 · · Score: 1

      Sorry, buy AAC is a standard format, as much as mpeg4 is. Granted, your $5 128M mp3 player may not be able to play it, but WinAmp, XMMS, WindowsMediaPlayer all can play AAC last I checked. Hell, there are even command line tools that can.

    40. Re:Limited playback by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (like, I can't take my iTMS music with me, I can't use it on my Mac, I can't use it with iTuens) is, well, a deal breaker for anyone with a brain.

      Oh yea for sure because I love my music wrapped up in DRM and iTunes is the best mp3 player around, it only takes up 60 megs of RAM!

    41. Re:Limited playback by PHPfanboy · · Score: 1

      Microsoft has plenty of our soles. (I think I spelled that right?)

      --
      29 mpg. YMMV.
    42. Re:Limited playback by slofstra · · Score: 1
      Interesting comments. My eyes glaze over when I start to read about the ins and outs of DRM - I'm not referring to your post here - just to say that I'm not knowledgeable on the subject and I think most consumers don't care a lot about it either as long as they can do most of the things they want to do. And they tend to learn by trial and error. That's why allowing someone to keep a copy of a song for only 3 days (or whatever the condition was) is a bad idea. First you give someone a song and then take it away. This will just annoy users and provide a quick exit for the Zune to the electronic toy graveyard most people have in a dresser somewhere.

      Personally, I only buy CDs, but I have observed that my adult children don't mind the 'itunes' restrictions because they can still burn a number of copies of their downloaded songs for mix CDs - as many as they'd ever want to. But their preferred method of song acquisition for the 'ipod' is still to buy a CD and rip the songs. 'itunes' is a secondary source.

      With regards to the 'verticality' of Apple's and MS's solution, I would think that that's why we have anti-trust, competition review, et al. To my ethical sense (not a legal opinion), 'itunes' should be required to publish a connection standard for their site that could be used by other player manufacturers, but that's just me.

    43. Re:Limited playback by Bluesman · · Score: 1

      Woooo.

      I guess everybody knows exactly what you're talking about.

      --
      If moderation could change anything, it would be illegal.
    44. Re:Limited playback by DarkOx · · Score: 1

      Yea, I wish I could get fully behinde you post but M$ has done the impossible before. Xbox got a good pice of Nintendo's and Sony's action in the console world. I don't think most people expected that to happen prior to launch; and really it was sheer marketing that drove that and nothing else. I mean honestly who things Xbox was really a better product then PS2 or Gamecube; it isnt. Now Xbox360 has made some great strides and It truely does out class the last generation, but we have not see PS3 or Wii in their final forms yet it remains to be seen how they will stack up. 360 is a nice product and it will be hard to beat.

      I would be worried if I was Apple because even if Zune is a still steeming pile; M$ will get the name out their and into the mindshare. Zune may flop because it won't offer any reason to leave Apple. but Zune[360] might be nice product and people will be more willing to buy Zune[360] just because they know its a follow on product and therfore is "refined" many will make this judgement haveing never held a Zune.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    45. Re:Limited playback by rtechie · · Score: 1

      The path to success in dethroning the iPod is not to try to do the same thing Apple does, only better, because that's not possible. It's like starting up a new car company and saying your goal is to outsell the Toyota Camry. You'll never do it.

      Which is why the Honda Accord outsells the Camry, right?

      Apple's success is the result of a combination of a good product, having the first online music store that worked with a damn, and an incredibly slick marketing campaign. Technically, there are MANY players clearly superior to the iPod and the PlayForSure/Janus stores offer all that iTunes does and then some. Most experts and audiophiles ("early adopters") have moved on. Apple still packages everything together much more smoothly for the non-expert, which is why they dominate the market. For the first time someone else is producing a similar package. We'll see if MS can fuck this up.

    46. Re:Limited playback by Technician · · Score: 1

      Granted, your $5 128M mp3 player may not be able to play it, but WinAmp, XMMS, WindowsMediaPlayer all can play AAC last I checked. Hell, there are even command line tools that can.

      Hmmm.. I have been sleeping in keepin up. I standardised on MP3 when my living room DVD, Car stereo, and portable CD player would all play MP3's and some would play one other format sometimes WAV, sometimes WMA, and sometimes AAC. The only common format is MP3.

      Are they making car stereos and DVD players that now play AAC files? I don't count a device with an I-Pod cradle/dock as an AAC player. It's a player with an external connector such as a 1/4 inch jack, 1/8th inch jack, RCA jack, XLR jack, I-pod dock, etc.

      Not all Plays For Sure tm players are $5 or contain only 128 meg of memory. However most of them will play MP3's and connect as a USB mass storage device. No special drivers needed except to support DRM files. As such you can copy to and from the device at USB speeds, not the speed of the devices sync program.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    47. Re:Limited playback by webweave · · Score: 1

      And don't forget that once you use iTunes to burn your iTunes songs to a CD the DRM is gone. Therefore if you want to back up your iTunes paid music just burn it! If you want to move it to another computer or device you can.

      I'm afraid the DRM is the first question I want an answer to when new formats and players arrive. I don't want to have to manage time limits on my music like some kind of software/seat license scheme.

      Will Zune play my current music or will I have buy or beg for all my music to play? Then the terms might change.

    48. Re:Limited playback by Miguelito · · Score: 1
      The MP3 market was very immature when Apple stepped in. Apple stepped into an immature market with an product bundle (both the slick iPod AND iTunes) and marketing and PR power that other MP3 players couldn't even begin to compete with. Apple pretty quickly hit critical mass and snatched up the entire immature market before anyone had a chance to defend themselves from the Apple takeover.

      I respectfully disagree. When the iPod first came out, the mp3 market was not that immature still. I personally (and most other early adopters like me) had already owned at least a 1/2 dozen different players by then, from flash based, to CD-mp3 to hdd players. Sales of iPods weren't even that phenomenal until late 2003/early 2004. It took growth through word of mouth, and people seeing how simple they were to use (not to mention how well integrated into iTunes it was) before it really took off.

      The release of the windows version of iTunes helped a lot too of course.
      --
      - My favorite error message: xscreensaver, running on an old Sparc 5 w/ 8bit color: bsod: Couldn't allocate color Blue
  2. Zune Scares Apple to the Core??? by Jhon · · Score: 5, Funny
    Think of it as a portable, wireless, hardware version of MySpace.
    Forget Apple -- this is reason enough for Zune to scare ME to the core!
    1. Re:Zune Scares Apple to the Core??? by ryanov · · Score: 1

      "Sorry! an unexpected error has occurred.

      This error has been forwarded to MySpace's technical group."

    2. Re:Zune Scares Apple to the Core??? by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      You mean Zune's running Windows ME?! OMG!

    3. Re:Zune Scares Apple to the Core??? by Afrosheen · · Score: 1

      And behind the scenes, we can see how Myspace's Technical Group performs its wizardry.

        #!/bin/bash

        cat $error_message from $webserver >> /dev/null

        Yes, I know it won't work, it's for humor only.

    4. Re:Zune Scares Apple to the Core??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was pretty much my immediate reaction.

      I mean, all cool for people who actually care, but I just want to play some bleedin' music. And I have a lot of music (and listen to it all) so the player does need a lot of space.

      I'll keep my 30 gigpod.

  3. Zune? Puh-leeze. by WilliamSChips · · Score: 4, Insightful

    All it has going for it over the iPod(except the lovely brown color!) is the filesharing thing, which not only is poorly concieved to begin with, is locked down with overrestrictive DRM and won't even be any useful until there's enough people with the Zune.

    --
    Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    1. Re:Zune? Puh-leeze. by jfengel · · Score: 0

      Well, it does have a larger screen, one capable of playing wide format movies. I don't know if that's enough to make it an iPod "killer", but it's certainly a compelling argument for buying the Zune if you want to watch video on the thing.

    2. Re:Zune? Puh-leeze. by griffon666 · · Score: 1

      >> filesharing thing, which [...] won't even be any useful until there's enough people with the Zune.

      Exactly. About 10 years ago, I bought a Palm IIIx back in Germany. One of the features was infrared connection with other Palm IIIx users. Few people I knew in medical school owned such a device. AFAIR, I exchanged data wirelessly twice over the lifetime (!) of my Palm IIIx with other users.

    3. Re:Zune? Puh-leeze. by bjohnson · · Score: 1

      Well, until Apple releases their widesceen format iPod.

      All of this hoopla from the hoopleheads makes the idiotic presumption that Apple is going to stand still, and Microsoft wins 'because they're big'.

    4. Re:Zune? Puh-leeze. by grazzy · · Score: 1

      If theres something apple isnt known for it is their "quick" actions. The take their time.

    5. Re:Zune? Puh-leeze. by enc0der · · Score: 1

      I felt the display they used looked very nice, especially for the size. However, for some reason all I can think of is Sony and their DRM issues with all their players and how that pretty much killed the market for them. I see this happening with the Zune, at least from what I see so far.

    6. Re:Zune? Puh-leeze. by wootest · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Apple may take their time, but let's not pretend Microsoft is all that nimble.

    7. Re:Zune? Puh-leeze. by Dargoth_Rejuv · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Well, it does have a larger screen, one capable of playing wide format movies. I don't know if that's enough to make it an iPod "killer", but it's certainly a compelling argument for buying the Zune if you want to watch video on the thing.
      The Zune screen is 4:3, just like the iPod one, so I don't see how it's any more capable of playing wide format movies than the iPod (or others).
    8. Re:Zune? Puh-leeze. by plazman30 · · Score: 5, Informative

      The Zune screen is 320x240, the same as the iPod. It's just slightly larger (larger pixels) and rotated differently. Any belief you can play widescreen content on it is seriously misguided. Andy

    9. Re:Zune? Puh-leeze. by ZorinLynx · · Score: 1

      Sure you can play widescreen content on it. It's called letterboxing and has been around for ages.

    10. Re:Zune? Puh-leeze. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MS can not compete with the amount of accessories Apple now has. You don't just buy an IPod, you buy an IHome for your bedroom, an IBox for your shed, a car that lets you control your IPod from the stereo, etc. On top of that, MP3 players are reaching saturation point IMHO.

    11. Re:Zune? Puh-leeze. by vought · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yes, and TFA fail to mention the most important aspect of this "scaring Apple" scenario:

      People must actually want these features in order to ante up for the Zune "experience".

      IMHO, people don't want this kind of superintegrated media/software/myspace connection. Look at how well AMP'D mobile and the similar "lifestyle" phones are doing - they measure success in the hundreds of customers. ESPN Mobile just went down the toilet for good.

      If Microsoft's past performance has been any indication, this attempt at lifestyle superintegration will be a mess - a security and synchronization headache that even for the few interested in such an experience, will quickly become more trouble than it's worth.

      Apple wins because the iPod does a few things very well, looking the best while it does it. Zune, in attempting to be all things to all people, misses the point; there are actually very few people who want anything to do everything.

    12. Re:Zune? Puh-leeze. by dalerb · · Score: 1

      You're correct and, as Dargoth_Rejuv pointed out, the aspect ratio of the screen is 4:3, just like the iPod. But MS oriented the longer side of the screen with the longer side of the device (landscape mode?) which may lead people to believe that they are getting something "capable of playing wide format movies".

    13. Re:Zune? Puh-leeze. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      people don't want this kind of superintegrated media/software/myspace connection.

      I disagree, people absolutely want a superintegrated device, nobody wants to carry around 4 different tools. The issue isn't that people don't want it, the issue is that due to various design/implementation issues, it's currently almost impossible to create that one tool that can do those things and meet other critical requirements (form factor being a major one). The right form factor for carrying things with you everywhere (e.g. cell phone) sucks for watching movies (e.g. portable dvd player/psp) and for entering information (e.g. laptop). If someone could figure out a way to resolve the conflicting form factor issues, then people would purchase the device in droves.

    14. Re:Zune? Puh-leeze. by Simulant · · Score: 1

      Yeah... and to me, wireless=crap battery life.
      About the last feature I'd want in a mp3 player.

      As for DRM, Apple's in trouble with or without Zune. All my iPod toting aquaintences are disuillusioned with itunes and royally pissed when they finally realize how many restrictions have been placed on the music they paid for.... (like when they're computer HD dies and they've got to jump through hoops to salvage any music) Same goes for users of similar DRM services.

      I see a migration from DRM to no-DRM. Zune is doomed.

      BTW any Underworld fans out there might like to know that they're selling new material in mp3 format with no drm at www.underworldlive.com. First time I've felt good about buying music in years.... wait... it IS the first time I've bought music in years. Those are my conditions.... No DRM and as direct from the artist as possible.

    15. Re:Zune? Puh-leeze. by pkulak · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Talk to any iPod owner and ask them if they'd like a player that can wirelessly share one promo song from an album they purchased online for three listens and they'll laugh at you. That's the difference with Apple. They think long and hard before they add a "feature" to a product. Other companies just throw everything they can at the wall in the hopes that something will stick.

    16. Re:Zune? Puh-leeze. by spideyct · · Score: 2, Informative

      Wait, are you linking to a Slashdot conspiracy theory (the text you linked to says "knowing Microsoft, it will PROBABLY..." as your supporting evidence for being poorly conceived?

    17. Re:Zune? Puh-leeze. by flooey · · Score: 2, Informative

      Apple wins because the iPod does a few things very well, looking the best while it does it. Zune, in attempting to be all things to all people, misses the point; there are actually very few people who want anything to do everything.

      Exactly. I remember a study that was done about music players a while back, and in terms of functionality (ie, not "style"), it found that basically only three things mattered to people: physical size, capacity, and battery life. Take a look at what Apple is advertising on the iPod Nano page and iPod page. I can't even find a real Microsoft home page for the Zune, the closest thing I can find is this press release, which doesn't even mention either physical size or battery life.

    18. Re:Zune? Puh-leeze. by cyber-vandal · · Score: 1

      Well over here in the land of the limeys teenagers regularly annoy me with mp3 player/mobile phone combos on the bus. Nothing like some braindead hip hopper yo'ing in your ear after a hard day's work. MMS has taken off somewhat as well so I'd say there is a market for integrated multimedia devices.
      Sounds more like your mobile providers are in the way again, which, given that that means you will probably not have brats inflicting tuneless garbage on you for some time yet, means I envy you Americans for once.

    19. Re:Zune? Puh-leeze. by bsane · · Score: 1

      They take their time and they still beat MS to market by 5 years...

      Think about that ;-)

    20. Re:Zune? Puh-leeze. by twofidyKidd · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Microsoft needs to read a little book by Clay Christensen called "The Innovator's Dilemma." In it, the author says people often "hire" things to do specific jobs. I sat in on a live discussion once where he used the example of a chocolate shake, and how the company selling a particular shake tried to improve the product's sales by trying to improve the overall quality and experience. It didn't have any impact on sales until they examined why people bought it in the first place. They discovered that people bought shakes often in the morning to give them something to sip on for the long commute into work. It beat out other products (muffins, coffee, fruit, etc.) because of the very specific job that people wanted it to serve: easy, no-mess, lengthy consuming time, interesting, etc.

      When I think of the Zune, I imagine how it seems to try to be so many things at once, when the reality is that people probably want a much simpler product to just provide music as a background to doing other things, like working out, grocery shopping, studying, etc. Obviously, I'm using the college-kid as an example market, but you have to consider that they are by no means a trivial market. I can't see "Zune Parties" going on in the dorms where kids are swapping songs on their Zunes. Anywho, it's for this reason that I believe that there's too much utility built into the zune that doesn't provide any remarkable value to the marketplace, and when you put it up against the iPod, both as a fashion piece and as a utility for listening to music, the Zune still has a lot of ground to cover against the iPod.

      If you ask me, they should have started by making it smaller, with less features, and as a fashionable alterative to the iPod.

      --


      Hades, PoD: Official Advocate
    21. Re:Zune? Puh-leeze. by jZnat · · Score: 1

      I'm sure people buy the iPod Nano because it's Completely Remastered.

      Hell, that's why I'd buy one (well, I'd actually get the 80 GB video iPod model since they're finally selling something I can totally dig spending $350 on).

      --
      'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
    22. Re:Zune? Puh-leeze. by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      Look at the username on that post again. Then look at the username at the linked post. Notice something?

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    23. Re:Zune? Puh-leeze. by gnalre · · Score: 1

      That and the fact you need 2 people to transfer. If all your friends have iPods and you have a zune, wireless is worth diddly squat.

      --
      Choose your allies carefully, it is highly unlikely you will be held accountable for the actions of your enemies
    24. Re:Zune? Puh-leeze. by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Apple wins because the iPod does a few things very well, looking the best while it does it. Zune, in attempting to be all things to all people, misses the point; there are actually very few people who want anything to do everything.

      I disagree completely. I for one would love to have one device that does everything I need or can think of: cellphone, MP3(Ogg) player, portable video player, PDA, etc.

      The problem is that no one makes such a device, and every time they try, they fail miserably. Because of this terrible track record, people go for devices which are more specialized, and work well. What good is a do-it-all device if it does everything poorly, or worse, breaks?

      Another big problem is how (at least here in America) all the big corporations try to sell us these devices, but then instead of making a device that works well, they try to use it as a way to extract more money from us in the form of service fees, pay-per-download, etc. For instance, with Verizon and other mobile phone providers, you can't just buy a phone and download some free ringtones and pictures off the internet and transfer to your phone: this is all locked out, and you have to pay to get this crap from Verizon's overpriced "Get it Now" service. Why would I want to buy an MP3 player/phone where I can't just transfer songs to the phone with a USB cable because some corporation wants more profits?

      Of course, with MS's track record on OS reliability, many people are naturally reticent about buying anything more complicated than an iPod; who wants a phone that blue-screens? Sure, maybe Windows Mobile is more reliable than that, but years of Windows 9x have scarred many consumers for life in their perception of computer reliability in general.

      The only way I'd want a single do-it-all device is if I could somehow piece it together myself from easily available hardware (like a standard PC) and install Linux on it so I could customize it the way I want. Since that's never going to happen with palm-sized portable devices, I'll just stick with separate, specialized devices.

    25. Re:Zune? Puh-leeze. by multimediavt · · Score: 1

      Ummm...have you seen video on the iPod screen? It's pretty nice. If you think about the relative size of a 27" screen being six feet away from you (which is where most people sit from their TVs), it's about the same viewing size with the iPod at about 18" from your face. It's surprisingly not bad. Not as good as a 17" wide laptop on a plane, but it does have better battery life.

    26. Re:Zune? Puh-leeze. by setirw · · Score: 1

      Incorrect. The iPod's screen is now VGA.

      --
      This message printed on 100% post-consumer recycled electrons.
    27. Re:Zune? Puh-leeze. by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Wait... are you implying that a Microsoft made device, running something that's very similar to parts of Windows (according to the article) with wifi that goes around advertising itself and opening connections to other devices is going to be insecure and a hassle? Come on, you don't expect us to believe that, do you?

    28. Re:Zune? Puh-leeze. by vought · · Score: 1

      I disagree completely. I for one would love to have one device that does everything I need or can think of: cellphone, MP3(Ogg) player, portable video player, PDA, etc.

      But I didn't argue that no one wanted a superintegrated do-everything device. Clearly, you want that, and poducts exist for you, like the Zune or Playerphones.

      To clarify, few people want a do-everything device. That means that you, while a minority if buyers, will see more value in a single device that does everything. A majority of music player buyers do not share your values, and instead find the discrete purpose and populaar style of the iPod more valuable.

      While TFA makes an interesting point, I think it's ultimately wrong for this reason.

    29. Re:Zune? Puh-leeze. by NetRAVEN5000 · · Score: 1
      "there are actually very few people who want anything to do everything."

      It isn't that so much as it is that usually these multifunctional devices are lacking in some way. Practicality is also an issue - so what if I can watch movies on my Zune, I'd rather watch it on a 27" screen than have to stare at a 5" screen and look like an idiot staring at my hand.

      If the Zune can perform all its functions well, then it might stand a chance. I wouldn't bet on it, but it might.

    30. Re:Zune? Puh-leeze. by protohiro1 · · Score: 1

      Worse still, the only people with the time and inclination do this kind of thing (share songs,movies,chat,etc) with four people in wi-fi range are going to be middle & high school kids in class. And the schools aren't going to let them bring them to school.

      --
      Sig removed because it was obnoxious
    31. Re:Zune? Puh-leeze. by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Did you not read my response? Did you stop after the first paragraph?

      The Zune certainly doesn't do everything. It doesn't have a phone, doesn't have a PDA (with a keyboard, something else I want (a la Zaurus)), doesn't run Linux, doesn't have a USB Host port, etc. MP3 phones don't have all this either (none of them have 30+GB hard drives).

      Unless you conduct a poll asking people about their preferences, I still maintain that people would like a superintegrated device, if such a thing actually existed and actually worked well, and didn't attempt to lock customers into overpriced proprietary stores like Verizon. No such device exists, and probably never will exist in our lifetimes the way these corporations act, so people instead have chosen single-function devices instead because there you can pick and choose the device that suits you best, and it generally works much better at those functions than the ones which attempt to do too many things.

      In addition, if such a device did exist, it would probably cost too much, and with the way things become obsolete so fast, it makes more sense to buy devices with fewer functions so you don't have to throw out a perfectly good music player because you want more advanced PDA features.

    32. Re:Zune? Puh-leeze. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Assuming that there is content at all. As of now, there is no video content on the way from MS's shop.

    33. Re:Zune? Puh-leeze. by plazman30 · · Score: 1

      Just checked Apple's site. It's still 320x240. It will just downsize 640x480 vidoes and play them on the screen.

    34. Re:Zune? Puh-leeze. by plazman30 · · Score: 1

      Well, then you would have the say the Zen M and iPod can also play widescreen content by letterboxing it. Overall, the only thing new in the Zune is the peer-to-peer wifi. Just remains to be seen if anyone is actually going to care about it.

  4. ZUNE: nothing to see, move along. by krell · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They might have my interest if there was an AM tuner alongside the FM one. Why would Microsoft in its infinite wisdom decide "let's put a RADIO in it" and only end up including half a radio? As I don't care for an FM tuner (I don't get music from the radio anymore), the iPod comes out looking good here.

    --
    Where were you when the voynix came?
    1. Re:ZUNE: nothing to see, move along. by WilliamSChips · · Score: 2, Informative

      There are technical reasons that an AM radio can't be done--specifically, it has to have a much larger antenna.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    2. Re:ZUNE: nothing to see, move along. by gstoddart · · Score: 1
      They might have my interest if there was an AM tuner alongside the FM one.

      What is this AM of which you speak? ;-)
      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    3. Re:ZUNE: nothing to see, move along. by hal2814 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's that band where they are upfront about talking all the time instead of pretending to be a music station and then talking all the time.

    4. Re:ZUNE: nothing to see, move along. by PowerEdge · · Score: 1

      It's where many people get their news and information believe it or not. Though I tend to listen to AM solely in the car. Traffic / Weather / News / Commentary etc. AM is still major media format.

      Further, with Digital AM, CD quality sound can be delivered on the same band.

      It'd be nice to have a digital portable receiver that could record AM / FM / Satellite and also do podcasting.

    5. Re:ZUNE: nothing to see, move along. by pkcs11 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      AM radio? You're well outside the scope of Zune's demographic.
        If they HAM radio to this baby and they'd win the hearts and minds of the world though. *g*

      --
      "I have an odd craving to whisper about those few frightful hours in that ill-rumored and evilly shadowed seaport of dea
    6. Re:ZUNE: nothing to see, move along. by krell · · Score: 1

      "AM radio? You're well outside the scope of Zune's demographic."

      You deserve better moderation than the 0. You are being insightful. I know well that AM listeners are too few in number to consider for this.

      "If they HAM radio to this baby and they'd win the hearts and minds of the world though. *g*"

      Hmmm. A Microsoft device using their "Secure" OS, that has a radio in it. How long before it becomes riddled with unwanted ads and malware? If you are looking for a SPAM radio, this might be just the ticket!

      --
      Where were you when the voynix came?
    7. Re:ZUNE: nothing to see, move along. by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      You can use a coil for an am antenna so it could be possible.
      A more likely reason is interference.
      AM will pickup just about every signal that the zune makes and dump it right through the headphones.

      Take an old PC and put an AM radio inside the case sometime. Odds are pretty good that you will pick up a lot of interference.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    8. Re:ZUNE: nothing to see, move along. by jandrese · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      AM is where you get all of the news you can care to listen to from radical far wing screwballs.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    9. Re:ZUNE: nothing to see, move along. by RonnyJ · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, I think the demand for an AM tuner isn't enough to justify it's inclusion as standard (although it's certainly possible).

      Shame though, as that would be the one additional feature I'd love.

    10. Re:ZUNE: nothing to see, move along. by gstoddart · · Score: 1
      It's that band where they are upfront about talking all the time instead of pretending to be a music station and then talking all the time.

      What is this music station of which you speak? *grin*

      Yeah, here in Canada, the only radio station I ever worry about finding is the local CBC Radio One -- which I guess is probably much like NPR in the US.

      The music I listen to doesn't receive much radio play, and all music which does get radio play drives me insane. If I want music, I have a stack of mixed CDs in my car or an FM transmitter for my iPod.

      I only want news and current events, so I guess I can see why people would want AM. But, I bet some marketing guy decided that most people don't want AM and it wasn't worth the nickel to add the circuitry. (I can only assume that circuitry for an entire AM radio is bordering on the utterly trivial nowadays.)

      Cheers
      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    11. Re:ZUNE: nothing to see, move along. by ip_free · · Score: 1

      If you want AM check this player out.
      http://www.radioyourway.com/
      I have older model and like it a lot. It is like a TIVO for a radio.

    12. Re:ZUNE: nothing to see, move along. by einolu · · Score: 1

      why isnt this post followed by an: lol, jk, rofl ???

    13. Re:ZUNE: nothing to see, move along. by udin · · Score: 1

      It is like PM only earlier.

      --
      udin
    14. Re:ZUNE: nothing to see, move along. by krell · · Score: 1

      Maybe cuz I'm not fond of crippled devices, and there are a few others who aren't either.

      --
      Where were you when the voynix came?
    15. Re:ZUNE: nothing to see, move along. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      AM is where you get all of the news you can care to listen to from radical far wing screwballs.

      You forgot the "left" in front of "wing."

    16. Re:ZUNE: nothing to see, move along. by TeknoHog · · Score: 2, Funny
      Take an old PC and put an AM radio inside the case sometime. Odds are pretty good that you will pick up a lot of interference.
      Odds are that the only kind of music you can receive inside a Faraday Cage is John Cage ;)
      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    17. Re:ZUNE: nothing to see, move along. by twofidyKidd · · Score: 1

      The AM radio band has a stigma associated with it that doesn't market well to a group of consumers within the 14-30 year-old range, and I am not talking about the NPR geeks (of which I am one) who would appreciate the inclusion of the AM band. AM is their dad's radio station, and that's just not cool (to some).

      --


      Hades, PoD: Official Advocate
    18. Re:ZUNE: nothing to see, move along. by SillyNickName4me · · Score: 1

      I can only assume that circuitry for an entire AM radio is bordering on the utterly trivial nowadays.

      It has been for decades. The not so trivial part is getting rid of interference from about everything else that is inside the device.

    19. Re:ZUNE: nothing to see, move along. by krell · · Score: 1

      I'm proud to be an NPR geek who doesn't give one thin dime to them during their beg-a-thons. I'm already being forced to give tax dollars to them. If they ever zero out CPB/NPR/etc taxpayer funding, I'll be the first to line up to "pledge". Just because I think they are good stations doesn't mean that I think the government needs to force people to contribute to them.

      --
      Where were you when the voynix came?
    20. Re:ZUNE: nothing to see, move along. by drsquare · · Score: 1

      AM is used for sports commentary, where is the stigma in that?

    21. Re:ZUNE: nothing to see, move along. by rynthetyn · · Score: 1

      Whatever the reason why device manufactures decided to leave out AM and only put in FM is irrelevant to my purchasing decisions. All I, as a consumer, really need to know is whether it has AM, and if it doesn't then it's virtually useless feature to me. I own an iPod for a reason--I don't like most of what is on music radio, and if I'm going to listen to radio I'm going to listen for news, sports talk, or hockey, all of which is on AM.

      As a geek, I can consider all of the reasons why an engineer would decide that AM isn't worth the trouble, but as a consumer, all I care about is if it has what I want. For that reason, the FM feature in Zune is just as useless to me as the iPod radio remote. If I wanted to listen to music on the radio I would have kept my 10yo Walkman.

      --
      Eagles may soar, but weasles don't get sucked into jet engines...
    22. Re:ZUNE: nothing to see, move along. by NoMaster · · Score: 1
      I can only assume that circuitry for an entire AM radio is bordering on the utterly trivial nowadays
      Yup. (And has been for about 33 years...)

      --
      What part of "a well regulated militia" do you not understand?
  5. Zune? by crazyjeremy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    What will ZUNE do that the Pocket PC / Windows Mobile platform cannot do? There are Windows Mobile devices out now for little more than $200 with built-in wifi. They ALL have QVGA screen or better, except for a few 240x240 square screens on some phones. Some are cheaper than the Zune!

    Why would Microsoft all but stop its interest in the pocket computing field that is totally capable of everything Zune can do, then build an entirely new device on a new platform? The only thing todays Pocket PC's don't have that Zune does have is the new software and a large harddrive. How hard could it be for M$ to add some software and bigger harddrive support to the already wonderful existing line of Pocket PC's? Plus, Pocket PC's can even have VGA Screens!

    Forget the Zune and it's "consumer media 'perfect storm'". Microsoft is recreating the wheel again just to try to squash competition. With it's interest on market share instead of true market need, this product will not live up to their expectations. Apple isn't the best out there. But they lead the market because they simply give a product that fills most consumer needs.

    1. Re:Zune? by imperialstormtrooper · · Score: 4, Insightful

      One of the main reasons everyone says the iPod is as popular as it is that it "just works"..while the pocket pc can do everything that te Zune can do, it isn't as simple to use. Microsoft is trying to get the simple to use thing going with the Zune... I do wish they slap an 80gig hard drive in my xv6700 though... I do see your point..

    2. Re:Zune? by zaphod_es · · Score: 1
      ...Apple isn't the best out there ....

      So what is the best? My elderly Creative Zen Touch is on its last legs and will soon be retired. I am not enthused by either iPod or Zune and the new Zen seems to be Windows only. The replacement will have to be accessible from both OS X and Linux and it would be a bonus if it handled ogg files.
    3. Re:Zune? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forget, Microsoft doesn't create Pocket PCs. They create software for Pocket PCs. Microsoft can't simply steal HPs products and modify. That would be up to HP, and HP would be getting most of the money. Microsoft wants to sell a product that is completely owned by them. They don't just make $40 in software sales, they can make $150 in software and hardware sales.

    4. Re:Zune? by Slithe · · Score: 1

      You might be interested in some products by this company.

      NOTE: I have never used any of these products, but I do know that some of them support Ogg, and they should work
      with any OS that supports USB.

      --
      ---- "XML is like violence. If it doesn't fix the problem, you aren't using enough."
    5. Re:Zune? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are those little Ms freaks who endorse everything from Bills smile to Ballmers voice, who won't be satisfied with less. The symbol of their status is Zune and they don't care about getting enslaved with proprietary DRM (which is proven to be a vendor lock-in method more that protecting artists).

      Don't think if it is software related then MS would make it's own competitor by enabling higher capacities for PPCs.. and remember, it's not just that zune costs more, you have to stick with Ms music store.. enjoy..

    6. Re:Zune? by crazyjeremy · · Score: 1

      The best is whatever device fits your specific needs. Again, this is the reason Apple works for most people. It does what they want quickly and easily (lets them listen to mp3's (purchased or downloaded) very easily.

      If you feel you have different needs than 70% of America right now, try http://dapreview.net/ and research until you find what suits your needs.

      I have visited some other sites that let you search for every single feature you want in a DAP / PMP, but I can't find the site at this time. If anyone else knows a link that would be great...

    7. Re:Zune? by Arterion · · Score: 0

      Maybe a mobile Windows Media Center edition for PocketPCs would do the trick. Give the ease of use and the power all at once.

      I'm holding out on all these portable devices until I get one that does it all. Phone + Computer + Music Player. Right now the PocketPC phones do all that, but they don't have nearly enough storage space for it to be useful unless you want to spend the price of the phone again on some sort of flash memory.

      --
      "That which does not kill us makes us stranger." -Trevor Goodchild
    8. Re:Zune? by molarmass192 · · Score: 4, Informative

      As a Linux only techie, I got a 30G iPod video recently as a gift and let me tell you that's it's a fun toy to play with on Linux. With the 1.2 firmware upgrade, you can use 640x480 h264 vids at up to around 2000kbps. iTunes doesn't digest those files, but gtkpod, as awkward as it is to use, uploads em without a hitch. It's a good MP3 player, but the "cool" is getting a video cable and bringing your video library with you. Vids encoded as described look surprisingly good, even on 42" sets. I also use the Photo (via gpixpod) and Notes feature quite a bit. For $250, I recommend it, even though I'd never have thought it could be worth it before owning one.

      --

      Good people do not need laws to tell them to act responsibly, while bad people will find a way around the laws-Plato
    9. Re:Zune? by InsaneGeek · · Score: 1

      I think you answered your own question, the reason why MS is introducing the Zune when a pocket pc can do the same stuff is the same reason why an ipod has been so successful when a pocket pc can do the same stuff an ipod can do. Just because it can do it, doesn't mean that it's an enjoyable experience. Apple re-invented the wheel (pocket pc can play an mp3 just as easily), grabbing massive market share. What a pocket pc lacks is ease of use, the ipod had much less functionality than a pocket pc, but it was infinately easier to use to acquire & play and mp3. MS is doing the same thing, make it stupid simple (I'm assuming) remove all the complexity that a pocket pc has and sell it to joe-schmoe who doesn't want to open up a spreadsheet, he wants to be entertained.

    10. Re:Zune? by nine-times · · Score: 1

      What will ZUNE do that the Pocket PC / Windows Mobile platform cannot do?

      I don't know, but I'd hope that ZUNE won't be horrifically slow, annoying to use, and crash all the time. Seems to be that that's all PPC does on the phones I've seen lately.

      Seriously, though, you have a point. Our computers are wireless and play all this media, so if someone could really come up with a usable handheld computer, an "MP3 player" may not be necessary. However, Microsoft took a run at that task earlier in the year with their UMPC idea, and that wasn't much of a success.

      I suspect some of this will change when there is high speed ubiquitous wireless internet that isn't through any cell phone network. I say this because handhelds are generally built into phones these days, and the phone carriers make sure these devices are hobbled in stupid ways because they don't want to become dumb-pipe ISPs.

    11. Re:Zune? by catmistake · · Score: 1

      Probably because the Windows Mobile platform works about as well as the Windows platform. That is to say, not at all well. OK, lets call a spade a spade, its shit.

    12. Re:Zune? by dfghjk · · Score: 1

      "What will ZUNE do that the Pocket PC / Windows Mobile platform cannot do?"

      - have more than a few optimistic hours per charge
      - be easy to use as a media player
      - not be dog slow and prone to lockups and reboots
      - have WiFi that's actually useful for its intended purpose

      "Why would Microsoft all but stop its interest in the pocket computing field that is totally capable of everything Zune can do, then build an entirely new device on a new platform?"

      Because the new platform is far more desirable as a media player.

      "The only thing todays Pocket PC's don't have that Zune does have is the new software and a large harddrive."

      That's a pretty big thing, though, isn't it?

      "How hard could it be for M$ to add some software and bigger harddrive support to the already wonderful existing line of Pocket PC's?"

      That is what they did, but they optimized the package so it wouldn't suck (as bad).

      "Apple isn't the best out there. But they lead the market because they simply give a product that fills most consumer needs."

      Isn't what Apple does with the iPod exactly what you just criticised Microsoft for doing?

    13. Re:Zune? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No offense, but you sound like one of those people that said "I'd buy one if they'd include a radio" or "My samsung player does all that too", and then when you actually use an iPod, something clicks and you say "Wow, this is cool as heck. All those other people were right!"

    14. Re:Zune? by fithmo · · Score: 1
      Microsoft is trying to get the simple to use thing going with the Zune...

      Hopefully it goes better with the Zune than previous attempts have gone with Windows.

    15. Re:Zune? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you want iTunes to take the 640x480 H264 files use a modified MP4Box like Nic's at http://nic.dnsalias.com/NicMP4Box.zip
      (That's for windows, but the source is at http://nic.dnsalias.com/NicMP4Box_src.zip, should be easy to compile for your flavour of *nix)

    16. Re:Zune? by lekikui · · Score: 1

      Or in this case, lose $50 on software and hardware sales. Maybe they should have stuck with their previous business model.

      --
      "Lisp ... made me aware that software could be close to executable mathematics." - L. Peter Deutsch
    17. Re:Zune? by crazyjeremy · · Score: 1
      - have more than a few optimistic hours per charge
      - be easy to use as a media player
      - not be dog slow and prone to lockups and reboots
      - have WiFi that's actually useful for its intended purpose
      Wow, my opinion is that you got everything wrong. I can watch 5 hours of full screen 640 x 480 video on my ipaq. TCPMP is one of the best media players on ANY platform, let alone the Pocket PC. It plays Divx, Xvid, AAC and more. Between it and GSPlayer, I can listen or watch anything I want and easily make playlists and listen to only what I want, when I want. If you still use anything microsoft for media on a Pocket PC, you have some learning to do. Windows Mobile 2003 is not dog slow and prone to lockups. All the chumps that got Windows Mobile 5 get those features. There's a reason it's called ROM (it's not supposed to be written to over and over). So why does WM5 try to use ROM as RAM? Microsoft scred up on that one, simple as that. WiFi on Pocket PC is great! I use skype, surf & post at slashdot, and control office equpment thanks to my wifi connection, but I guess as you say that's not what it's meant for.

      Because the new platform is far more desirable as a media player.
      We'll see.

      "The only thing todays Pocket PC's don't have that Zune does have is the new software and a large harddrive."
      That's a pretty big thing, though, isn't it?
      No, not really. I'm sure some enterprising youngsters with lots of time on their hand are working right now to duplicate and improve on Zune's wireless sharing philosopy. Only they'll do it without DRM restrictions and open it up to any Pocket PC with wifi. Now for the harddrive? We can just get an 8GB Compact Flash for under $150 if we really want more space.

      Dude you're slated in the wrong direction. If you're touting a new, unknown product with less features as being better than a proven product with more features, you are either misinformed or have a set of needs entirely different than most. Pocket PC platform has more usability in every angle than the Zune except for space.
  6. MySpace? by Alcimedes · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I don't know that that's really what they want, although supposedly that's what they're shooting for. MySpace had it's 15 seconds, and IMO is heading out the door. I don't know that you'd want to take a brand new, unbranded product and slap a "It's like MySpace, only you carry it WITH YOU!" label on it.

    If MS really wants to scare Apple, they need to come out with a way to make it cooler than Apple's product. MySpace ain't it.

    1. Re:MySpace? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately it might be. Everyone I know has "A Myspace". It's like the AOL Instant Messgenger of the decade. It is annoying and popping up everywhere.

    2. Re:MySpace? by ericdano · · Score: 1

      Yeah. That shooting yesterday was MySpace related. The guy researched his victims on there.

      MySpace is a total cesspool. It reminds me when everyone had to have a Domain name and a webpage.

      I don't think Microsoft is going to win on this. Apple is easily 3 steps ahead of Microsoft, they just have not thought people would want or use this. And they are right. The idea of "beaming" my songs to someone is like beaming contact information on Palm handhelds. Yeah, neat, but not really all that useful.

      What would be MORE useful is a broadcast feature, where you can look and see other iPod devices near you, and listen in on what they are listening to. That would be pretty cool....

      --
      It's either on the beat or off the beat, it's that easy.
      I moderate therefore I rule!
      --
    3. Re:MySpace? by abigor · · Score: 1

      "MySpace had it's 15 seconds, and IMO is heading out the door."

      Why on earth would you say that? Do you have any stats to back that up? Everything I've seen shows the site's growth accelerating. It's become more or less the official area for numerous bands, for example.

      Cringely's article this week has a section on the Zune, and why it's actually not competing with the iPod.

    4. Re:MySpace? by thrillseeker · · Score: 1

      "MySpace had it's 15 seconds, and IMO is heading out the door."

      Why on earth would you say that?

      It's called wishful thinking. Myspace - AOL without the charm.

    5. Re:MySpace? by Gruneun · · Score: 1

      It reminds me when everyone had to have a Domain name and a webpage.

      Yeah, and look at that stupid Internet fad. It certainly went the way of the dodo.

    6. Re:MySpace? by shantipole · · Score: 1

      If you write about, play, listen to or are otherwise involved in music, My Space is an incredible resource IMHO.

    7. Re:MySpace? by thrillseeker · · Score: 1

      It's just so painful.

    8. Re:MySpace? by paganizer · · Score: 1

      The theory that the guy researched his victims on myspace seems a little far-fetched to me. The Guy was living in a Jeep; (as a wrangler owner i'm going to have to assume it was a cherokee), libraries won't connect to myspace in most places, and while he could have been a wardriver, he just doesn't look the type.
      Now, I can see the possibility that he was browsing for teens on the internet, and then came across a picture that showed the girls in that class ("here are me and my blonde airhead friends in english class!"), which would sync with the myspace theory, but it doesn't go along with the previously released information, that he stood the girls up and discarded the ones that didn't fit his "vision".
      However, I don't find the myspace theory any more likely than the one where the guy was hired to do it by the guy(S) who had been molesting the girls in a club-like atmosphere for several years in order to silence a possible witness.

      I think the most likely story is this: the guy was a nut. he may have had the name of one girl who he had seen on the street or in a newspaper, and may have asked which class she was in. the rest of the girls were just in the wrong place at the wrong time.

      --
      Why, yes, I AM a Pagan Libertarian.
    9. Re:MySpace? by colmore · · Score: 1

      I'm inclined to agree. This thing looks like a classic example of Microsoft "innovation:" it's got a shot-gun spread of bullet-list features (how easy is it to imagine the meeting where someone pitched this thing, I haven't read a single article about it that doesn't read like a powerpoint presentation).

      But it's Microsoft, they're going to f**k up the implementation. They always do. The XBox was a clunker of a video game system that "succeeded" (while it has done well, it certainly hasn't given M.S. the Windows-like grip on videogaming that they're clearly hoping for, and it hasn't really taken off as a home media center -- which is how they actually want to make money off of it.) due to its raw specs rather than a classy, slick implementation. It doesn't matter what whiz-bang thing it can do (especially considering that transferring songs to a media player is about the upper ceiling on most customers' technical aptitude) if it feels awkward to use.

      Lastly, totally new products that bank on feature convergeance have an abysmal track record launching. Real feature convergeance happens slowly over long product lines, letting users get comfortable. This thing is going to be Microsoft's Newton: a nifty ahead-of-its-time gadget that wasn't actually any joy to use.

      --
      In Capitalist America, bank robs you!
    10. Re:MySpace? by protohiro1 · · Score: 1

      God I hope myspace is dying, but don't ask me to predict its future. I know its VERY popular with the 18 set. Is the zune really the MySpace of music players? I guess it is possible, but I highly doubt it. This article seems to buy the hype that web 2.0 is somehow transformative. That somehow the magic of online communities has revolutionized the way 18s communicate or something. Yes, myspace is very popular with the teenagers. They like being able to communicate with friends and they REALLY like the fact that its basically a rompus room with no supervision. They like posting songs and pictures on their myspace page (just like stickers on your folders or patches on your backpack). But I don't think this fad is some sort of tidal shift in the attitude of the young that apple has missed the boat on. I'm sure kids would love to be able to pass songs to each other on their ipods or zunes or whatever. They don't get that with zune. If the zune was a pocket pc with ev-do/hspda and a decent interface that allowed text messaging, song sharing, image sharing and a myspace/youtube like online experience...which it may someday, this could just be the start. I can see that working. Myspace succeeded more from network effects than from the merits. Everyone is on myspace because everyone else is. The benefits of zune would require a lot of kids to have this product at once, the experience and features beyond an ipod would need to be compelling and entrance would need to be easy. This thing will cost $250...most kids don't have that cash to drop on something like that. Only if microsoft can make this a must have will they kids start buying, and to do that they need to offer more than sharing a song with four friends in the same room.

      --
      Sig removed because it was obnoxious
    11. Re:MySpace? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's like myspace, only instead of being free, it costs $250. And instead of being seen by everyone, it can only be seen by other zune's. Oh, yeah, and it's by Microsoft, which really helps with that anti-establishment rebel feeling.

    12. Re:MySpace? by arthurpaliden · · Score: 1

      "MySpace had it's 15 seconds, and IMO is heading out the door." Really, MySpace poplation is increasing by a million of so per week. Out of the original 6 million pages, 2 million are still accessed by their owners at least once every couple of days. And of those active pages only 18% are identified as being owned by teenage girls(15-19). (5% are sex/age undifined).

    13. Re:MySpace? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The XBox was a clunker of a video game system that "succeeded" (while it has done well, it certainly hasn't given M.S. the Windows-like grip on videogaming that they're clearly hoping for, and it hasn't really taken off as a home media center -- which is how they actually want to make money off of it.) due to its raw specs rather than a classy, slick implementation.

      Say what you will about Microsoft Windows, but having developed for PS2, XBox, Xbox360 and PS3, I'll take Microsoft's implementation any day.

    14. Re:MySpace? by mike_elgan · · Score: 1

      *** I don't think Microsoft is going to win on this. Apple is easily 3 steps ahead of Microsoft, they just have not thought people would want or use this. And they are right. The idea of "beaming" my songs to someone is like beaming contact information on Palm handhelds. Yeah, neat, but not really all that useful. ***

      I never said Microsoft would "win" or that Apple would "lose." I'm saying only that Apple is taking the Zune far, far more seriously than iPod fans apparently are.

      I do disagree with you about the Wi-Fi feature. I think that's the device's "killer app," and predict Apple will copy it within a year. Why? Because real people really share lots of media in real life. Being able to do so from the device, without a PC, is a no-brainer.

      Mike Elgan

    15. Re:MySpace? by protohiro1 · · Score: 1

      It was a clunker for the end user (huge, loud with a bad ui). No one cares how easy/hard things are for developers. VB.net is really easy to develop for...

      --
      Sig removed because it was obnoxious
  7. LOL... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 0, Troll

    As a proud owner of a MacBook, this is the funniest thing I've seen on Slashdot in longest time.

    1. Re:LOL... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      as a proud sheep might say...

      "Bahhhh"

    2. Re:LOL... by daniil · · Score: 1

      fanbox.

      --
      Man is a slave because freedom is difficult, whereas slavery is easy.
    3. Re:LOL... by nsmike · · Score: 1

      Don't get too overconfident in the Apple brand.

      Keep in mind, Apple took a crapple at the idea of MS undercutting their 30 GB player and lowered their prices. That move alone shows that there is at least some merit in this article and the idea that Apple may be nervous about the Zune.

    4. Re:LOL... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      That's kinda like saying saying Apple is nervous of Dell because the new Mac Pro undercuts Dell's price for a similar machine. Maybe Apple decided to lower prices to stay competitive in the market while offering a great product?

    5. Re:LOL... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a proud owner of a macbook pro, I understand that competition is good for industry.

    6. Re:LOL... by nsmike · · Score: 1

      No, actually, they're nothing alike. Dell Vs. Apple is nearly a totally different arena. When people think of the iPod they don't think "Apple computers" they think "Portable music and music store." The iPod market is the exact opposite of Apple's computer market. Apple's market showing for the iPod is dominating while their computers have a marginal market presence at best. Microsoft, on the other hand is synonymous with computers for the average joe, while for the same average joe, Apple is synonymous with incompatability. Apple is selling the iPod BRAND as much as it is selling the product. That's why the Zune is being pitched as a seperate brand altogether. Notice all marketing material simply says "Zune" not "Microsoft Zune." Apple recognizes its own strategies when put into action. The Zune brand does that nicely, nearly as nicely at this point as iTunes. The only thing that might make the Zune the underdog at this point is its late entry into the game. But Microsoft has shown in the past that it is ready, willing and able to outlast its competitors, so don't think Apple hasn't already thought of a lot of what this article points out. The question is, can they come up with a viable competitive offering that doesn't simply look like a hapless "me too" attempt? You may call the Zune a "me too" product, but it takes several departures from the iPod product which, in my opinion, set it above the iPod.

  8. What scares me is.... by Bin_jammin · · Score: 1

    people somehow rooting for Microsoft. When you're that big, do you really need a fan club on slashdot?

    1. Re:What scares me is.... by berenelen · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A Slashdot fan club for Microsoft would be an amazing sign. Slashdotters have never ever EVER been content with... anything.

      --
      ~ nomes/berenelen/beren/bere/etc...
  9. "A portable version of MySpace"? by payndz · · Score: 1

    Well, with the brown version it's certainly got the 'ugly colour scheme' aspect of MySpace down perfectly!

    There's one major difference between Zune and MySpace, though. MySpace's underlying 'philosophy' is basically "Check out what I'm into!" Zune's is "Buy what I'm into... from a major corporation!"

    --
    You must think in Russian.
    1. Re:"A portable version of MySpace"? by RoffleTheWaffle · · Score: 1

      "Buy what I'm into... from a major corporation!"

      Isn't MySpace owned by Fox?

    2. Re:"A portable version of MySpace"? by GrayCalx · · Score: 1

      Damn, I liked the brown one.

      My opinions are laughed at on /. once again... i have no reason to live.

    3. Re:"A portable version of MySpace"? by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      It is owned by News International, who also own Fox.

  10. a good comparison... not really by macadamia_harold · · Score: 4, Funny

    The Zune isn't just a music player, the article argues. Think of it as a portable, wireless, hardware version of MySpace.

    You mean it looks like crap and is completely inane? I'll pass, thanks.

    1. Re:a good comparison... not really by GrayCalx · · Score: 1

      And its a portal for you to molest underage boys and girls.

    2. Re:a good comparison... not really by jZnat · · Score: 1

      They didn't mention that in the article. I'm so totally in now! ;p

      --
      'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
  11. Out Of Business by sycodon · · Score: 5, Funny

    So I guess Apple will again be out of business by the end of the year. I bet they get tired of packing and unpacking.

    --
    When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    1. Re:Out Of Business by Deadguy2322 · · Score: 0

      town to town, up and down the dial. Baby, you and me were never meant to be, just maybe thinnk of me once in a while.

      --
      Check out my foes list to see who is so retarded that they can't use the signature line!!!
    2. Re:Out Of Business by catmistake · · Score: 1

      Funny.

      If Apple was a smaller co, and didn't already have most of the digital music space marketshare, maybe they would be concerned. We know Microsoft... instead of creating something innovative, they find something innovative already on the market, then release their bastard copy of it, though it be vastly inferior, it is so cheap it they can flood the market, thus driving the poor, young, innovative company that came up with the product in the first place out of business. Apple isn't scared. And they won't say anything. But you know they're thinking "Bring it on, M$... you dumbasses... every step you take, you're gonna double OUR marketshare." Every unit M$ sells will be like free advertising for iPod.

    3. Re:Out Of Business by protohiro1 · · Score: 4, Informative
      This author is another cringely as far as I can tell. From his web site on May 13, 2003:
      Microsoft will cope with the problem the same way it always does: It will "embrace and replace." The company will come out with its own distribution of Linux within the next three years...Microsoft Linux will feature proprietary "enhancements" that make it better than other versions of Linux. This incompatibility on the one hand and feature superiority on the other will reproduce the current difficult choice between Linux and Windows Server...
      So I would take what he says with a grain of salt....
      --
      Sig removed because it was obnoxious
    4. Re:Out Of Business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If everything microsoft came out with was a "bastard copy" thats "vastly inferior", they would never have made it to where they are today. Whether you like microsoft or apple, its just stupid to make such overgeneralizations. Also, there is no way apple could double their marketshare, as right now they're sitting at about 70% for mp3 players(last I heard, could be a bit off)

  12. Nothing new here, mostly the old FUD and some igno by chriss · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think the article is somewhat too nice towards the Zune, eg they do not mention the problem that even your own unprotected recordings will be forced into a DRM wrapper, preventing them to be shared after three days. That might even make it a breach of license agreement for creative commons licensed music, because they demand that if you give a track to someone else, that person has to be able to pass it on, impossible with the Zune.

    But more interesting the five points why Apple should be scared:

    1. Microsoft is hatching a consumer media "perfect storm."

    The argument is that Microsoft will leverage any installed base they have (Windows, Xbox, Soapbox) and due to a similarity with the Windows Media Center user interface and Vista will have a strategic advantage. Also their 90% share in operating systems vs 5% for Apple [I think it's even less than that] 2. The Zune is social and viral.

    The article claims that the world has changed since the introduction of the iPod, obligatory citing anything with the Web 2.0 label as social and viral and therefore claiming a demand by todays youth to be able to share immediately anything, making Zune's WiFi hip and the iPod old fashioned.

    I guess that is the only real argument here, but nothing new. Microsoft failed to leverage their installed base before, eg with Smartphones, where they failed miserably even though the syncing with Outlook is so important. And the 5% of Apples market share does not seem to be a problem, the majority of iPod buyers already use it with windows

    Maybe, but I doubt it. Let's remember that P2P was big long before the iPod and iTMS, they introduced a business model that got accepted by people that were used to get everything for free due to it's ease of use. Due to Zune's DRM restrictions there will be no widespread sharing on school yards, so even if the world would demand to return to the early Napster days, the Zune will not allow this.

    3. Zune may have more programming.

    The pick on Apple launching with videos only from Disney as a sign that Microsoft has more support from the movie industry. But as was discussed earlier today on slashdot, this may be simply due to Walmart and soon be a problem of the past. Even worse, if Apple made a deal with Walmart, they might try to push the Zune out.

    Concerning other media formats like music and TV shows, as far as I understand basically everybody is currently trying to make deals with Apple as fast as possible to take their share of the cake.

    4. Zune's screen is better for movies.

    No doubt, that is true, and it will play into Microsoft's hands. There have been a lot of other media players already featuring larger screens, so this alone does not seem to be a reason for customers to switch. But more important might be all the signs indicating that Apple already has a full screen video iPod in the pipeline (their patents for the virtual scroll wheel), so this advantage for Microsoft might soon be gone.

    5. Zune is actually pretty cool.

    This boils down to taste, and from what I've read in a lot of forums (with a lot of not Apple friendly users), the design, color, DRM are not as cool as computerworld claims. We shall see.

  13. 200 million Vista users? by hlimethe3rd · · Score: 1

    In a world where half of corporate America uses Windows 2000? Sorry, please try again.

  14. Antitrust ? by Pop69 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    About 30 million people own iPods. But Microsoft owns more than 90% of the worldwide operating systems market (compared with Apple's roughly 5%), representing some 300 million people. The company expects to have 200 million Vista users within two years."
    And therein lies the reason that Microsoft have already found themselves in front of courts for antitrust infractions.

    Illegally using a monopoly position to expand into other markets.

    Wonder if anybody will do anything about it this time ?
    1. Re:Antitrust ? by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 1

      Illegally using a monopoly position to expand into other markets.

      What, precisely, is illegal about this? It would be illegal if they decided to cripple iTunes/iPod on Vista. Simply making a music player that is designed to work well with their OS is not illegal at all.

    2. Re:Antitrust ? by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 2, Informative

      What, precisely, is illegal about this?

      Leveraging a monopoly to gain market share in another market is illegal. In this case, MS has bundled their software music player with Windows, which is illegal in and of itself. That player plays a DRM-ladem music format owned by Microsoft. If their hardware and software players play it and that ability is not offered to all other software player and hardware player manufacturers, free of charge, then that too is illegal.

    3. Re:Antitrust ? by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      "Illegally using a monopoly position to expand into other markets."

      Illegal because...?

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    4. Re:Antitrust ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      itunes wouldn't need to need to be crippled by m$ on windows, its already a bloated dog of a program, anyone with half a clue would know this

    5. Re:Antitrust ? by 0racle · · Score: 4, Funny

      How dare they offer new products!

      --
      "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
    6. Re:Antitrust ? by tb3 · · Score: 1

      The saying around Redmond these days is, "Vista ain't done 'till iTunes won't run."
      (Or so I've heard.)

      --

      www.lucernesys.comHorizon: Calendar-based personal finance

    7. Re:Antitrust ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No it's not. Maybe in your fantasy land, but we live and work in the real world.

    8. Re:Antitrust ? by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      No it's not.

      Antitrust. Perhaps the relevant quote in the section titles "Prohibited Anti-competitive Behavior" would be, "Tying - The practice of making the sale of one good conditional on the purchase of a second distinctive good." It has been illegal since the Sherman antitrust act in 1890.

    9. Re:Antitrust ? by Pop69 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      That would be because the US courts say so

      http://www.usdoj.gov/atr/cases/f4400/4469.htm

    10. Re:Antitrust ? by windowpain · · Score: 1

      "MS has bundled their software music player with Windows, which is illegal in and of itself."

      Says who?

      Have they been indicted or sued by the Justice Department for bundling Windows Media Player yet? If not, when do you expect that to happen?

      They also bundle Internet Explorer and WordPad. Are they illegal too?

      --
      Insert witty sig here.
    11. Re:Antitrust ? by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1, Informative

      Says who?

      The Sherman Anti-trust act of 1890 in the US.

      Have they been indicted or sued by the Justice Department for bundling Windows Media Player yet?

      Nope. They were convicted of it in the EU though, which has nearly identical antitrust laws.

      If not, when do you expect that to happen?

      Just as soon as we elect a president for whom MS is not one of the largest contributors for their election campaign, i.e. not Republican or Democrat.

      They also bundle Internet Explorer and WordPad. Are they illegal too?

      MS was convicted of illegal tying for IE, but their punishment was negligible, as all the people in charge of the case were replaced right after Bush was elected and the new justice department officials though "nothing" was an appropriate punishment for someone who gave them so much money in bribes, err I mean, legal lobbying funds.

      Wordpad does not compete in an existing, market and as such is probably not a violation of anti-trust law.

    12. Re:Antitrust ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So... which part of that page specifically says it is illegal for Microsoft to sell a music player that works with Windows?

    13. Re:Antitrust ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If that's the case, Apple is just as guilty with their iTunes/iPod DRM crap that locks you into their system. I take it you had a business law class in high school and are now an expert in this area of the law.

    14. Re:Antitrust ? by windowpain · · Score: 1

      The Sherman Act does not make bundling Windows Media Player with Microsoft Windows illegal. The Sherman Act makes various anti-competitive practices illegal. Whether or not including WMP in Windows fits that definition is debatable and, IIRC has yet to be brought before any US court.

      --
      Insert witty sig here.
    15. Re:Antitrust ? by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 3, Informative

      Leveraging a monopoly to gain market share in another market is illegal. In this case, MS has bundled their software music player with Windows, which is illegal in and of itself.

      Not at all. You're probably confused with the Netscape case - but there, they strongarmed OEMs to *not* include Netscape. That's the "leverage" part. Simply competing in multiple markets, when you have a monopoly in one, is absolutely not illegal. It's not illegal for those products to work well together to the point that they make a compelling combination either. That's fair competition, doing something better than someone else.

      Now, if they start forcing OEMs to include their player and not iTunes (as if any OEMs included iTunes now), that would be illegal. Hacking windows to make iTunes and iPods incompatible would be illegal. Making music software is *not* illegal, nor is including it in Windows free of charge.

      If their hardware and software players play it and that ability is not offered to all other software player and hardware player manufacturers, free of charge, then that too is illegal.

      No, it's not, especially since MS won't have a monopoly in music players.

    16. Re:Antitrust ? by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 1
      Leveraging a monopoly to gain market share in another market is illegal.


      So, you mean that it would be illegal to design a music store that only works with your MP3 player, which only works with your music software?

      In this case, Apple has bundled their software music player with OS X. The iPod plays a DRM-ladem music format owned by Apple. If their hardware and software players play it and that ability is not offered to all other software player and hardware player manufacturers, free of charge, than that too is illegal.


      It never ceases to amaze me how Macheads can hold Apple to a completely different standard than the rest of the industry. DRM is suddenly OK when it's part of QuickTime, iTunes, and the iPod - but you had better not bring up how Vista has WM-DRM support. Tying a player to a specific music store and a specific desktop application is OK when it's Apple, but Microsoft had better not do it or you'll give them hell.

      Oh, and the first person who says "they're a convicted monopolist" gets their head smacked. It is Apple has a monopoly in the MP3 player market. You only have to look at the market share to see that. It is Apple who is using their player monopoly to push their desktop software and their music store.
    17. Re:Antitrust ? by dfghjk · · Score: 1

      I guess, then, that it's illegal for Microsoft to sell mice and keyboards according to you.

    18. Re:Antitrust ? by mei_mei_mei · · Score: 1

      Abosultely correct. iTunes, the iPod and iTMS are designed from the start to be a completely self contained, locked in system and to bare other companies from competeing in any of its domains - software and hardware players and store.

      The music companies know very well Apple have a monopoly and they don't like it one bit. They're likeyl to want MS to succeed so there's some competition thyere.

    19. Re:Antitrust ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple may only have 5% of the operating system market, but it is the TOP 5%.

    20. Re:Antitrust ? by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      I guess, then, that it's illegal for Microsoft to sell mice and keyboards according to you.

      Are you being paid to write this crap? It is illegal to tie the sale of one product to the sale of a product they have monopolized. They can sell mice and keyboards. They can bundle mice and keyboards. They can bundle Zune and mice and keyboards and Frontpage. They can't legally bundle them with Windows.

    21. Re:Antitrust ? by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      Whether or not including WMP in Windows fits that definition is debatable and, IIRC has yet to be brought before any US court.

      Yeah, just because it is a very clear cut case, with no real facts in debate, clear precedent, and they've been convicted of the exact same act in the EU courts is no reason to think what they are doing might be illegal.

    22. Re:Antitrust ? by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      So, you mean that it would be illegal to design a music store that only works with your MP3 player, which only works with your music software?

      Nope. Designing something is not illegal. Even creating such a bundle is not illegal... right up until the point when one of the products in that bundle gains monopoly influence in the market. Apple is close to that position now and under investigation as to whether or not that is the case. If they do have significant influence in the portable music player market, tehn they are breaking this same law.

      It never ceases to amaze me how Macheads can hold Apple to a completely different standard than the rest of the industry.

      Umm, what? How is holding Apple responsible for following the same laws a "different standard?"

      DRM is suddenly OK when it's part of QuickTime, iTunes, and the iPod - but you had better not bring up how Vista has WM-DRM support.

      I don't approve of DRM at all, but it is legal, so long as it is not bundled with a monopolized product. Windows is a monopoly, thus it is illegal to bundle anything with it. IPods may be a monopoly and it may be illegal to bundle anything with it.

      Oh, and the first person who says "they're a convicted monopolist" gets their head smacked.

      MS is a convicted monopolist (bring it on) thus it is obvious to everyone involved, including MS that there is no way what they are doing is legal.

      It is Apple has a monopoly in the MP3 player market. You only have to look at the market share to see that.

      70% market share is the share where many laws start to examine what influence a company has in the market. Their influence is by no means a foregone conclusion, certainly not as much as a company where numerous courts have already issued legal convictions, upheld throughout the appeals process.

      It is Apple who is using their player monopoly to push their desktop software and their music store.

      Both Apple and MS are using their large market shares to push other products. The difference is, for MS this is clearly illegal and for Apple is may or may not be illegal.

    23. Re:Antitrust ? by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      Not at all. You're probably confused with the Netscape case - but there, they strongarmed OEMs to *not* include Netscape. That's the "leverage" part. Simply competing in multiple markets, when you have a monopoly in one, is absolutely not illegal.

      The leverage part, is making the purchase of Windows conditional on the purchase of WMP. That is to say, in order to buy Windows, you have to also buy WMP. And don't give me any fictions about WMP being free. That is just marketing. Engineers are paid to work on it and their money comes from you buying copies of Windows. This is the single most common form of tying and there is so much precedent that no one even bothers to argue it.

      It's not illegal for those products to work well together to the point that they make a compelling combination either. That's fair competition, doing something better than someone else.

      This part is true, with one caveat. The interface between the two products that work together has to be open and documented so that products that compete with the one that is not monopolized can build the same level of integration. Otherwise, those secret interface constitute an illegal tie, where the monopolized product is being leveraged. This was demonstrated in the EU case against MS when they ruled the secret protocols between Windows desktop and Windows server constituted an illegal tie between them and ordered MS to document those protocols so that others could compete fairly.

      Now, if they start forcing OEMs to include their player and not iTunes (as if any OEMs included iTunes now), that would be illegal.

      True, but that does not make the current bundling any less illegal. You'll note the law is almost exactly the same in the EU and they were convicted of this there. If it goes to trial in the US, they will lose here too.

      Making music software is *not* illegal, nor is including it in Windows free of charge.

      The first part is correct, the second part is a fiction. In terms of economics, nothing is truly free. It is either offered as a separate product(free or paid) or it is part of a bundle that is being paid for. In the current instance, it is part of a bundle and that is illegal in the US.

      No, it's not, especially since MS won't have a monopoly in music players.

      It does not matter. They do have a monopoly on desktop OS's and thus anything that those programs can do relating to Windows, that other makers of music players cannot (not don't, can't) is illegal tying.

    24. Re:Antitrust ? by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      If that's the case, Apple is just as guilty with their iTunes/iPod DRM crap that locks you into their system.

      Apple may or may not be guilty of anti-trust tying, depending upon whether or not they wield monopoly influence in the portable music player market. This is a close call at this point, but it is under investigation right now. If they are found to have a monopoly, then they are guilty of tying, without question. At that point it will be very interesting to see what remedies are ordered by the courts that convicted MS and then ordered almost no remedy at all.

      I take it you had a business law class in high school and are now an expert in this area of the law.

      No, I passed Econ 101 a decade ago and can read. Pick up any book on economics and read the section on anti-trust, or read the wikipedia link I provided. This isn't rocket science. I have been astounded again and again how many people here on Slashdot don't have any clue at all what antitrust law is all about or what it says. They go off half-cocked ranting about it, but don't bother to read even the short summary on wikipedia that explains what the hell they're ranting about.

      I have two theories. The first is that technically people have a fear of anything legal or business related and thus avoid learning even the basics. The second (supported by the number of ACs) is that their are a lot of paid astro-turfers out there trying to confuse the issue and spread misinformation.

  15. Re:*snicker* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, not at the prices they are going to charge.... other than cool do-dads and whiz-bang, vista doesn't have any major functionality changes besides their search function that will compel most businesses to upgrade.

  16. How does the OS matter? by in2mind · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Apple fans are overconfident in the iPod because Apple once commanded 92% of music player market share, a number that has since fallen to around 70%.

    About 30 million people own iPods. But Microsoft owns more than 90% of the worldwide operating systems market (compared with Apple's roughly 5%), representing some 300 million people. The company expects to have 200 million Vista users within two years.

    They talk as if Microsoft having 90% of worldwide OS market is the reason why Zune beats iPod.But does it matter much? iPod has 70% of the mp3 market anyway even without the 90% OS share that microsoft enjoys.

    Why should OS mkt share matter to MP3 player mkt share,unless microsoft does something to hamper the working of iPod on its OS - something it hasnt done till now.

    1. Re:How does the OS matter? by Viraptor · · Score: 1

      It matters, because you now see MS as GREAT company, compared to little Apple. It's not supposed to make sence - it's supposed to make impression.
      It's just fud genuine advantage...

    2. Re:How does the OS matter? by Murphy+Murph · · Score: 2, Funny
      They talk as if Microsoft having 90% of worldwide OS market is the reason why Zune beats iPod.But does it matter much? iPod has 70% of the mp3 market anyway even without the 90% OS share that microsoft enjoys


      I think you are underestimating what Microsoft can do with that 90% (desktop) OS market share.
      If Apple was able to capture 70% of the digital audio player market by leveraging their 5% OS market share, by my calculations Microsoft should be able to capture 1260% of all DAP sales within five years.

      --
      I dub thee... Sir Phobos, Knight of Mars, Beater of Ass.
    3. Re:How does the OS matter? by mike_elgan · · Score: 1

      * * * They talk as if Microsoft having 90% of worldwide OS market is the reason why Zune beats iPod. * * * My article didn't say Zune would beat iPod. That Microsoft has 300 million OS customers (roughly ten times the number if iPod users) is one of the reasons Apple is afraid of the Zune (as oppose to, say, some generic Korean wanna-be MP3 player). Does anyone doubt that Microsoft will use Windows to promote Zune? People tend to really like the XP "Media Center" interface. The Zune interface is very similar. Like Apple, Microsoft is using both explicit and subtle tie-ins between OS UI and media player UI. When you consider that the overwhelming majority of iPod users are Windows users, you can see why Apple is worried.

    4. Re:How does the OS matter? by dfghjk · · Score: 1

      "...unless microsoft does something to hamper the working of iPod on its OS - something it hasnt done till now."

      I think you mean "something it hasn't done".

    5. Re:How does the OS matter? by Tibor+the+Hun · · Score: 1

      First of all, welcome to slash.

      Many of us have spent countless nights repairing mistakes that MS has made.
      Working weekends repairing networks of machines exploited by holes left open by MS, so that everything is peachy keen for the users coming in to work on Monday. We see hundreds of thousands of dollars being spent on enterprise anti-virus licenses just so that the the OS can provide basic functionality.
      So, many, many, many of us (take a look at your UID) really have a hate-hate relationship with MS.

      No matter how many articles you write in computerworld, or post on slash, we're not going to change our opinions.
      Too many wasted weekends and late nights working to fix Microsoft's blatant mistakes.

      And not only has the shit in the past jaded us, the future doesn't look any better... What's on the horizon? Bloated, out-classed, late, unproven, and DRM-laden OS that will finally allow us to forego the floppy disk in our next computer purchase. Oh wait, I guess anyone who will rely on Vista will still have to have a floppy drive, just in case.

      Welcome to 2007, 38 years after the invention of the net, we hope you've brought your 37 year old technology with you! You can use it to store a whopping 140 seconds of music on it!

      --
      If you don't know what AltaVista is (was), get off my lawn.
  17. Time to turn off the ol' Philco. by krell · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "There are technical reasons that an AM radio can't be done--specifically, it has to have a much larger antenna."

    I have a shortwave radio that is smaller than any iPod except for the Nano (and Shuffle). Along with the many bands it receives, it gets AM. Almost all of the case is taken up by the speaker, the visual tuning hardware, and the batteries. I have not opened it up, but I am guessing that the antenna hardware is smaller than a cap to a ball-point pen. Time to turn off the ol Philco in the wooden case. News in from Tokyo: there are miniature AM radios now.

    --
    Where were you when the voynix came?
    1. Re:Time to turn off the ol' Philco. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm willing to bet that the antenna is a thin wire that runs the length of the case.

    2. Re:Time to turn off the ol' Philco. by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      Some radios use the headphone cable as the antenna. I don't know the technical details, but I don't see any fundamental reason not to do it, since the radio frequencies are well away from the hearing range. However, they do have the problem that you cannot connect the headphone output into an amplifier. The amp will screw up the reception. I've tried :)

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    3. Re:Time to turn off the ol' Philco. by jZnat · · Score: 1

      Are you implying that if radio waves were a high enough frequency, you'd be able to hear light? I don't get it...

      (Radios work via inductors; the light does some science magic with the electrons)

      --
      'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
    4. Re:Time to turn off the ol' Philco. by NaugaHunter · · Score: 1

      I have a shortwave radio that is smaller than any iPod except for the Nano (and Shuffle). Along with the many bands it receives, it gets AM. Almost all of the case is taken up by the speaker, the visual tuning hardware, and the batteries. I have not opened it up, but I am guessing that the antenna hardware is smaller than a cap to a ball-point pen. Time to turn off the ol Philco in the wooden case. News in from Tokyo: there are miniature AM radios now.

      News in from Cupertino: hard drives cause interference, and you've already pointed out the spaced-crammed flash-base Shuffle and Nano are already too small.

      --
      R: That voice. Where have I heard that voice before? B: In about 365 other episodes. But I don't know who it is either.
    5. Re:Time to turn off the ol' Philco. by arminw · · Score: 1

      .....I'm willing to bet that the antenna is a thin wire that runs the length of the case......

      A ferrite rod antenna doesn't have to be big an is very sensitive. Those have been in small AM radios for at least 25 years already.

      --
      All theory is gray
    6. Re:Time to turn off the ol' Philco. by TeknoHog · · Score: 1
      (Radios work via inductors; the light does some science magic with the electrons)

      As the sibling post already explained, light and radio are both electromagnetic waves. They both do magic with electrons; in fact, the electric fields (forces) merely make the electrons move in the circuit.

      Inductors are conventionally used in the resonance circuit which filters the radio frequencies you choose, but it's possible to make a radio without inductors at all.

      On the other hand, there are 'inductor antennas' that work with the magnetic (instead of electric) part of radio waves. IIRC these usually have very low efficiencies, and they are only used in some specialty applications like RFID which only works at a close distance ('near field' in physics jargon).

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  18. OS Integration by vistic · · Score: 1

    I'd say the only thing about the Zune that should scare Apple is that the Zune can be integrated very tightly with the most popular operating system on the planet.

    I doubt the user experience will be better than the iPod though... so hopefully the quality of the iPod set up will win out over the coercion behind the Zune.

    Of course this doesn't affect those of us who don't use Windows.

    1. Re:OS Integration by Tweekster · · Score: 1

      But what benefit does that give the user.

      In all honesty I dotn give a shit if it is integrated, I just want one nice peice of software to control it, ala iTunes or whatever. One program to do what it does well, not 100's of apps that work sort of.

      --
      The phrase "more better" is acceptable English. suck it grammar Nazis
    2. Re:OS Integration by mei_mei_mei · · Score: 1

      What's really importsnt is that the Zune software will peobably come with or be an almost mandatory download for every windows amchine and most people will use it on their PC to listen to music, so when it comes to buying a portable device to take that music out and about the natural choice will be a zune. I expect to see many PC manufacturers offering Zunes as optional extras, like they do with printers,digital cameras etc. now.

    3. Re:OS Integration by vistic · · Score: 1

      My point wasn't that integration benefits the user at all. Actually I was trying to say the opposite. It's a way for them to force the Zune down our throats.

    4. Re:OS Integration by vistic · · Score: 1

      And if the PC manufacturers offer Zune as extra, you can probably bet that they didn't have as much choice in the matter as they'd have you believe.

      Even if they just stick a Zune advertisement somewhere or make some MP3 syncing software icon like a Zune or refer to "Zune, or other MP3 players..." or put some link on the desktop to "Get a Zune now!" or "Visit the Zune music store!" ... then that'd irritate me, anyway.

      I don't like it when the corporations think they can get you to buy something you don't want. They think if they nag you enough you'll finally see things their way.

      Well... works for some people I guess.

  19. Sidescreen != Widescreen by camt · · Score: 1, Funny

    FTFA: More importantly, it can be turned sideways for a wide-screen movie experience, which is vastly superior to watching movies on an iPod.

    You can just turn screens sideways for wide-screen movie experience? Why didn't anyone tell me?! Boy did I ever get snookered when I bought my widescreen HDTV. I could have just turned my old TV sideways!

    -- Cameron

    1. Re:Sidescreen != Widescreen by KarmaMB84 · · Score: 1

      I think you forgot the part that the TV wouldn't automatically switch to widescreen view just by turning it over that way. The Zune is supposed to do just that.

    2. Re:Sidescreen != Widescreen by easter1916 · · Score: 1

      He was joking, for Christ's sake.

    3. Re:Sidescreen != Widescreen by GrayCalx · · Score: 1

      Yeah... yeah. Not following your logic there. Wide-screen is widescreen if the screen has a 16:9 aspect ratio, I'm pretty sure thats widescreen. Don't see how the cases orientation has anything to do with anything. How does rotating your iPod sideways do? That working out for ya?

    4. Re:Sidescreen != Widescreen by Doctor+Memory · · Score: 1

      Any idea what I'm supposed to do if I want to lay it on an airline tray table and watch something? It would suxx0r if it changed orientation every time the plane banked...

      --
      Just junk food for thought...
    5. Re:Sidescreen != Widescreen by Dragon+of+the+Pants · · Score: 0

      Wow, that was hilarious. I can't stop laughing. I wish I still had mod points.

  20. 300 Million? Pfui! by JoeWalsh · · Score: 1

    It's always startling when I see the supposedly huge numbers trotted out by industry, then I think about the size of the total population, and I think...pfui! Like platinum records in the US represent sales of 1 million albums. Big deal - 1/300th of the U.S. population bought your album! Whoopee! *Everyone* loves you, don't they?

    Or these numbers for Microsoft. So the worldwide operating system market is 300 million copies? Holy crap! Given work computers and all, we're talking about only 200 million people who use computers in the whole world!

    Besides, the planet does have 6 billion people, so again, we have a small, niche market. And all the noise that's made over it!

    It just always amazes me when I see these numbers and realize what a tiny proportion of the population is buying a given shiny-object-of-the-month, yet it's all over the news as if every person everywhere on the earth were buying it.

  21. wireless fraud by Tom · · Score: 4, Insightful

    My guess is that the success of the "Zune" (can someone come up with a funny wordplay on this, please?) depends mainly on how quickly the public learns that the much-hyped "wireless sharing" is in fact so crippled that it's almost worthless.

    You see, the whole "storm" and "viral marketing" thing is dead in the waters already because a song received wireless can't be retransmitted. In other words: Actual exchanges will be very limited to single songs and local-only. No "spreading". Well, not for songs. I'd be very surprised if it takes more than a month for the first wireless Zune virus to appear.

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    1. Re:wireless fraud by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

      can someone come up with a funny wordplay on this, please?

      Microsoft may not be as in Zune with the market as they think. :)

      People may just tend to Zune them out.

      Oh, wait, you said funny. Sorry. :(

      Too little, too Zune.

      Crap, that one doesn't even work.

    2. Re:wireless fraud by nizo · · Score: 1
      "Zune" (can someone come up with a funny wordplay on this, please?)


      All your Zune belong to US!

    3. Re:wireless fraud by Nicholas+Evans · · Score: 1

      So wait, a device that tries to connect to other devices and push down crap files that melt down after three days (regardless of their license!) isn't a virus already?

      Damn. Viruses that affect viruses. I'm waiting for something like the Anti-Santy worm to get around and start 'fixing' Zunes.

    4. Re:wireless fraud by dkleinsc · · Score: 4, Funny

      In response to your request for wordplays:

      That's no Zune... it's a Play Station.

      There is no spoon. There is only Zune.

      and finally,
      Windows Vista will be out real Zune now.

      Thank you, thank you I'll be here all week.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    5. Re:wireless fraud by zaphod_es · · Score: 1
      can someone come up with a funny wordplay on this, please?)

      Not yet but I will Zune think of something.
    6. Re:wireless fraud by ArtDent · · Score: 1

      Windows Vista will be out real Zune now.

      Clap, clap, clap!

    7. Re:wireless fraud by ribuck · · Score: 1

      Moon, june, spoon, croon, zune?

    8. Re:wireless fraud by advance512 · · Score: 1

      Zune sounds like "ziyun" (zee-ooh-n) which is the Hebrew word for fuck. (As in, intercourse. Not in the many other ways it is used =])

    9. Re:wireless fraud by crabpeople · · Score: 1

      I think he meant monkier not wordplay. Like m$, microshaft, or winblows

      I cant think of any good ones though. I wonder if they do monkier focus groups when designing product names...

      --
      I'll just use my special getting high powers one more time...
    10. Re:wireless fraud by Tom · · Score: 1

      Windows Vista will be out real Zune now.

      I'll take that one until someone comes up with a better one. :-)

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    11. Re:wireless fraud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      my guess is that the success of the zune depends mainly on how long it takes people to wise up to the fact that 4 buttons arranged in the shape of a circle does not equal a click-wheel.

    12. Re:wireless fraud by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1
      Moon, june, spoon, croon, zune?
      Steve Jobs: Do not try and break the Zune. That's impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth.
      Mac User: What truth?
      Steve Jobs: There is no Zune.
      User: There is no Zune?
      Steve Jobs: Then you'll see that it is not the Zune that trends, it is only yourself.
      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
    13. Re:wireless fraud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And as people get frustrated with the DRM:

      One of these days ... BAM! ... straight to the Zune!

  22. Re:*snicker* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They didn't say "200 million customers".

  23. This isn't about mp3 players by krell · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "Why should OS mkt share matter to MP3 player mkt"

    Are you sure iPod has 70% of the mp3 market? Or are most users using it to play proprietary iTunes files? With the ZUNE for sure, the main thing Microsoft is pushing it for is NOT mp3 files, but MS's own DRM formatted files.

    --
    Where were you when the voynix came?
  24. 200 Million? by From+A+Far+Away+Land · · Score: 1

    First of all if Vista is even out by their predicted date I'll be surprised. But then what makes them think they'll trick 200 Million people into "upgrading" from XP Home or Media Center, when most peoples' PCs are already adaquate for the tasks they are doing. Are people really going to be such raging computer whores to buy that much Vista Microsoft DRM junk in such a short time period? I mean it's not exactly the leap from 2000 to XP even.

    1. Re:200 Million? by GrayCalx · · Score: 1

      As i posted in another response, who said anything about upgrading? You have about 200 million NEW computers sold each year. Lets be conservative and take away half for Macs, Linux and Companies buying machines but not OSes. That puts them right on track for 200 million. Thats not even including the over-the-counter OS sales and Microsoft shops that install the OS just to learn and be on the leading edge.

      I don't understand why slashdot readers have such problems with that number. I think its a very reasonable, attainable estimate.

  25. peer to peer only? by Zamfir · · Score: 1

    i am in the market for a new player and was actually considering this, until


    "At least in the initial release, Zune's Wi-Fi won't connect to a network. It's peer-to-peer only." would they really ship this thing with 802.11 but not allow me to manage the music on it using that connection?

    1. Re:peer to peer only? by thrillseeker · · Score: 1

      i am in the market for a new player and was actually considering this, until "At least in the initial release, Zune's Wi-Fi won't connect to a network. It's peer-to-peer only."

      I suspect the patch to make it a fully capable machine will be found at http://www.debian.org/>here soon enough.

    2. Re:peer to peer only? by Saige · · Score: 1

      Think... software update in the future.

      I wouldn't be surprised if that feature was in the original specs and got dropped for launch to make sure they made the holiday season. Instead, it will be added in for a future firmware update.

      It just makes too much sense to not include it at some point.

      --
      "You know your god is man-made when he hates all the same people you do."
    3. Re:peer to peer only? by Zamfir · · Score: 1

      perhaps, but this is going to create a lot of confusion. lots of people with wireless networks are going to see that this thing "has wireless", bring it home, and find it's a useless feature.

  26. What about Apples response? by cavehobbit · · Score: 1

    If this is the first salvo in an Apple-MS war, with MS threatening one of Apples biggest profit and publicity engines, will Apple finally be moved to market/license it's OS to other hardware vendors/the public?

    It has been speculated on for years if not decades, but since it is already running on Intel chips....?

    1. Re:What about Apples response? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple will not license their operating system. They are a hardware company.

      See, they don't make money on their OS. They make money on hardware, and sales of the hardware subsidize development of the OS The OS is just the main incentive to buy their hardware. Apple's real competitor isn't Microsoft, strictly speaking, but Dell; but because Michael Dell is such a twit, there's no media glamor in Apple vs. Dell.

      And the last time they tried licensing hardware, they were substantially undercut by their licensees and didn't see enough revenue from the license fees to make up for it.

      Alternately -- would you buy an OS X license if Apple sold a version for generic white-box PCs for $499? (It would take margin like that to make the OS development self-supporting without the hardware revenue.) How many other people do you think would?

  27. A Shorter Summary by obender · · Score: 5, Informative
    From TFA:

    Mike Elgan is a technology writer and former editor of Windows Magazine.

    1. Re:A Shorter Summary by eclectic4 · · Score: 1

      It fealt like I was reading a marketing PR piece the entire time I read the article. Full of nearly all opinions, and all glowing.

      --

      "The greatest obstacle to discovery is not ignorance - it is the illusion of knowledge." - Daniel Boorstin
  28. Re:*snicker* by GrayCalx · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Theres about 200 million computers sold each year nowadays (http://www.pegasus3d.com/total_share.html). Take away a few %s for Macs. Take away a few more %s for linux users. And a few more for companies that aren't looking to use the latest OS. So even if half of that number comes with a Vista OS preinstalled, they're about on target for 200 million in two years.

    And thats not counting over-the-counter, just-the-OS sales.

    I'm not saying these numbers are scientific, except for the 200 million new computers sold, but its definitely a goal they can obtain.

  29. FM is for Music .AM isn't . by in2mind · · Score: 1
    They might have my interest if there was an AM tuner alongside the FM one. Why would Microsoft in its infinite wisdom decide "let's put a RADIO in it" and only end up including half a radio?

    Because it is FM sound quality thats useful for music.The sound quality of music on AM is very inferior compared to that on FM .

    1. Re:FM is for Music .AM isn't . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because it is FM sound quality thats useful for music.The sound quality of music on AM is very inferior compared to that on FM .

      Podcasts aren't music. Audible books aren't music.

      Not that I care whether Zune does AM or not, but if Zune is designed to only do music, there's one more good reason not to get a Zune.

  30. Hubris by ackthpt · · Score: 1

    Think of it as a portable, wireless, hardware version of MySpace. With the Zune, Microsoft is trying to launch a consumer media 'perfect storm.'"

    Start believing this and they won't see it coming, the day they discontinue some of these "features" because they just aren't that good and there's not enough demand for them. Like that ESPN Mobile thing that began it's death throes yesterday. Just give the people a portable music player that's easy to use and they'll be happy.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Hubris by Overt+Coward · · Score: 1
      Just give the people a portable music player that's easy to use and they'll be happy.

      That would be... um... oh yeah, an iPod.

    2. Re:Hubris by ackthpt · · Score: 1

      That would be... um... oh yeah, an iPod.

      I'm just waiting for the news story to break, how someone hacked into Paris Hilton's Zune and copied all her favourite songs.

      Like, I fell so totally violated, you know?

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  31. Rhymes with Orange by krell · · Score: 1

    "... the "Zune" (can someone come up with a funny wordplay on this, please?)"

    I think that Microsoft came up with it because so far the word appear resistant to spoof and mockery. Like you can't find a word that rhymes with orange.

    --
    Where were you when the voynix came?
  32. Now, just checking by Silent+sound · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Is Apple, in fact, scared of the Zune?

    Or do Microsoft (and Microsoft Blog Relations reps like Zonk) simply wish Apple was scared?

    I note that integrating wifi into a music player is a really pretty good idea. I also note it isn't what Microsoft's done here. All they seem to have done is create a feeble, heavily restrictive music player equivalent of the DS's "pictochat" feature-- which, as any DS owner will tell you, never, ever, ever winds up getting used. If this incredibly limited player-to-player transfer feature is all the Zune has to differentiate itself from the rest of the crowd of mp3 players right now-- and to judge from the lack of even attempted hype over other features, it apparently is-- Microsoft is in big trouble here.

    1. Re:Now, just checking by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      I personally think Apple have the iPod perfect with it recharging from the USB whilst updating and managing the tunes.
      It makes it seemless and leaves you feeling completely untethered.

      There hasn't been a single complaint about my missuses ipod since we got it (well, apart from last night in the Apple store when she saw the new ones..)

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    2. Re:Now, just checking by I'm+Don+Giovanni · · Score: 1

      That Apple pre-emptively lowered the price of their 30GB iPod in the wake of Zune's announcement indicates that Apple is concerned, if not "scared".

      Whether Apple is "scared" or not, iPod fanboys certainly are, for how much the post FUD about Zune in a pathetic effort to discredit the product before it's released. If they were really as confident as they claim to be, they would ignore Zune rather than spending so much time bashing it.

      --
      -- "I never gave these stories much credence." - HAL 9000
  33. Re:Nothing new here, mostly the old FUD and some i by patrixmyth · · Score: 2, Insightful

    To look beyond the marketing FUD, I hope that the author is right and that the Zune does scare Apple. If Apple is scared then they may just dip into the candy box to add some new treats to the IPOD. I have no doubt that every feature on Zune has been discussed, designed and discarded by Apple already. I particularly like that Zune is taking playback on external devices (ie TV) seriously. We've almost arrived at my dream device now. When I can connect with my portable device over a remote wireless network to my home media (ala slingbox) and plug that into a plain old television set to watch the latest Sopranos streamed from my TIVO, then I'll buy. Meanwhile, I'll wait to get home and jog with my $39 mp3 player.

    --
    "Don't you know you're going to shock the monkey?"- Peter Gabriel
  34. Huh... by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 5, Funny

    Think of it as a portable, wireless, hardware version of MySpace.

    Well, that doesn't fill me with the "I must go out and get one right now" feeling so much as a "Run screaming with vengance into the night to fomemt up counter-revolutionary terror" feeling.

    It could just be me, though.

  35. Files are for music. FM Radio Ain't. by krell · · Score: 1

    "Because it is FM sound quality thats useful for music.The sound quality of music on AM is very inferior compared to that on FM."

    Why use the FM radio for music? That's what digital music files are for. I'm interested in the local drive time/etc talk radio programs found on AM radio, not the typical "Classic Rock on KTYQ 'The Weasel'!!!" station that has fewer songs that you find on an iPod Shuffle that they play over and over and over for years.

    --
    Where were you when the voynix came?
  36. Selling it at a loss is what is scary by weave · · Score: 1
    I read they are going to be taking a loss on every Zune out there. Typical Microsoft. They have enough money where they can undercut by selling at a loss. Then when they get a monopoly position, they can charge whatever they want.

    So much for honest competition.

    1. Re:Selling it at a loss is what is scary by zaphod_es · · Score: 1
      I read they are going to be taking a loss on every Zune out there. Typical Microsoft. They have enough money where they can undercut by selling at a loss. Then when they get a monopoly position, they can charge whatever they want.

      Funny that Apple and Microsoft are selling at almost identical prices and that MS loses a bundle while Apple cleans up (apart from having to subsidize iTunes). I think that Apple can withstand competition like that any day. Is somebody lying? Has somebody got their costings wrong?
    2. Re:Selling it at a loss is what is scary by Kalewa · · Score: 1
      Yeah because taking a loss on a platform in order to sell content for it is something only Microsoft does. And boy they really fucked us over on the price of the Xbox didn't they?

      All sarcasm aside, this is not a new thing, and I seriously doubt that even Microsoft thinks they're going to achieve total market dominance by undercutting the iPod by $5.

  37. Seamless until... by KokorHekkus · · Score: 1

    ...you find it causes rips in the fabric itself by applying viral DRM.

  38. Viral? All too viral! by griffon666 · · Score: 1

    >> The Zune is social and viral.

    The whole problem with the Microsoft "experience" is that their products are viral---not in the social engineering sense, but from a security standpoint. If it is as viral as Windows, I'll gladly pass on :)

  39. I'd like to counter that with ... by Frag-A-Muffin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Thought I'd like to point out that Zune probably isn't going to "steal" any iPod customers away. They may be able to get some people that are about to enter the DAP market, but not the ones that are already invested in iPods. The biggest reason, music collection and familiarity with iTunes. iPods don't do so well because of iPods. iPods do so well because of iTunes. You underestimate the ease of use of iTunes for people that are not so computer savvy. Do you honestly think they're going to be able to convert their iTunes collections over to the Zune format? (I believe M$ is offering up some tool to rip off the DRM from iTunes and apply their own DRM. Don't quote me on that. ... And ummm ... wouldn't that be a violation of the DMCA? :) But that's for another day)

    I don't personally use any of these music services. I use my treo600 for music still, cuz it's more than enough for me. However, I do have a bunch of non-computer people, and they will not budge from their iTunes addiction. They even buy music off of it.

    I had this one friend, we're talking about some song, and she said "Yah .. I just *downloaded* it off iTunes" .. I was like, "downloaded eh? don't you mean, *bought*" .. she didn't understand the difference? :) She obviously doesn't know how to pir8 things, but this is GOOD. It helps legitimize the electronic distribution of music! I freely admit downloading songs all the time. In fact, I have 5 or so CDs on my bookshelf that are UNOPENED, because I've already downloaded the album. I still support the artists by purchasing, and I like to have a hardcopy of it. But no one's gonna stop me from using it the way i want to use it. (You hear me RIAA?)

    Anyways, yah, my point was, iTunes users are entrenched, and it's a very tough sell to try to switch them. And honestly, there's no feature in the Zune that really is worth making that big switch.

    Side note: I'm betting that's why Apple didn't rush out the widescreen iPod video player. They didn't need to. :) The zune doesn't have much to compete with. However, I am betting they release it in '07, just after the zune launches to quiet them once and for all :) Apple's got some crazy ass distribution and integration going on with their iTunes/iPods/and soon to be released iTV!

    Exciting times!

    --

    AirSpeak - http://itunes.com/apps/AirSpeak
    1. Re:I'd like to counter that with ... by GrayCalx · · Score: 1

      iPods don't do so well because of iPods. iPods do so well because of iTunes.

      iPods do so well because teenagers tell their parents, "Suzie just got an iPod so I want an iPod too!" And their parents go out to a store and say "I want an iPod" and thats what the salesperson sells them.

      Or maybe some of the kids go buy their own... I guess thats possible.

    2. Re:I'd like to counter that with ... by Have+Blue · · Score: 1

      Microsoft is offering to give you a free Zune copy of any song you already bought from Apple. I expect this offer to last about 45 seconds before someone figures out how to spoof .m4p files.

    3. Re:I'd like to counter that with ... by Frag-A-Muffin · · Score: 1


      Microsoft is offering to give you a free Zune copy of any song you already bought from Apple. I expect this offer to last about 45 seconds before someone figures out how to spoof .m4p files.

      Hmmm ... I wonder how they're going to do that. Hook into iTunes to figure out which songs were purchased and then you'll be able to just download those from them? Does that mean you'll now have 2 legal copies of every song? Can you give away your iTunes song?!? Interesting.

      I thought I read somewhere though that they'd be giving you a tool to "transfer" your songs to zune format though. I thought Allard was even quoted. Don't know where I saw it though. Some tech blog somewhere :)

      --

      AirSpeak - http://itunes.com/apps/AirSpeak
    4. Re:I'd like to counter that with ... by nasch · · Score: 1
      I had this one friend, we're talking about some song, and she said "Yah .. I just *downloaded* it off iTunes" .. I was like, "downloaded eh? don't you mean, *bought*" .. she didn't understand the difference?
      She did download the song, didn't she? "Download" doesn't mean "download for free".
    5. Re:I'd like to counter that with ... by P3NIS_CLEAVER · · Score: 1

      It seems like Microsoft is going to take all the legal lumps for transmitting. Apple will just come out with some copy cat and revive their ipod sales.

      --
      Please sign petition to restore sanity to our banking system!!!

      http://financialpetition.org/
    6. Re:I'd like to counter that with ... by L7_ · · Score: 1

      The parents go to the Apple store and say "So that's an ipod! Then give me two!".

    7. Re:I'd like to counter that with ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had this one friend, we're talking about some song, and she said "Yah .. I just *downloaded* it off iTunes" .. I was like, "downloaded eh? don't you mean, *bought*" .. she didn't understand the difference? :)

      Says the guy who doesn't use iTunes and the iTunes Store and thus isn't aware that there is a lot of free content available.

  40. Forgettaboutit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If it's anything like the XBox 360, you can just forget that piece of junk. One thing about Apple is that they always produce a quality product.

    1. Re:Forgettaboutit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quit spamming with your apple fanboyism

    2. Re:Forgettaboutit... by joeytmann · · Score: 1

      Just make sure you buy second generation version of the product, then its a good product.

      --
      Insert funny smart-ass comment here.
    3. Re:Forgettaboutit... by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1
      If it's anything like the XBox 360, you can just forget that piece of junk. One thing about Apple is that they always produce a quality product.
      Apple Pippen VS xbox360...

      From the Apple wikipedia article:
      In May 2006, the Pippin was voted one of the 25 Worst Tech Products of all Time by PC World Magazine.

      Uh... Step out of the reality distortion field.
      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
  41. Re:Nothing new here, mostly the old FUD and some i by Tsiangkun · · Score: 1

    Does anyone know how to pronounce it ?

    is it ZooNee, which rhymes with looney, which is the type of person who wants all the security experience of microsoft leveraged in a mp3 player with a wifi connection ?

    is it Zuny, which rhymes with dummy, which is what I think of the people claiming this will get great battery life ?

    Is it just plain Zune, which rhymes with doom, which seems to be the fate of many would be killers of the iPod ?

  42. wide screen iPod by krell · · Score: 1

    "Side note: I'm betting that's why Apple didn't rush out the widescreen iPod video player"

    Or maybe the world is not quite ready for a portable media player that's 40 inches wide.

    --
    Where were you when the voynix came?
  43. Too Late by Perl-Pusher · · Score: 4, Insightful
    About 30 million people own iPods.

    I have purchased 3 iPods, one for me and the other two for my daughters. I have a huge mp3 collection, but I have also spent at least $300 on the iTunes music store. My Daughters have purchased much more than that. Why would I want to buy another almost $300 music player and re-purchase all those tunes? When my iPod dies, I'll buy the next ipod, the one with the features apple has added to stay competitive with microsoft.

    By the way will you be able to move the music from one device to another and burn an unlimited number of CD's? My music is on DVDs, my laptop, my desktop and my iPod. On iTunes all you have to do is change the playlist. In my experience with windows media formats they aren't nearly as unobtrusive as AAC. I can't see apple losing their portable music throne until someone produces a player that is vastly cheaper and doesn't get in the way of reasonable fair use. Apple's advantage is really theirs to lose. But they would have to read from Sony's playbook to do that. Poor quality, lack of features, high prices and restrictive DRM would do it. But I don't see apple commiting suicide anytime soon.

    1. Re:Too Late by DerekLyons · · Score: 1
      I have purchased 3 iPods, one for me and the other two for my daughters. I have a huge mp3 collection, but I have also spent at least $300 on the iTunes music store. My Daughters have purchased much more than that. Why would I want to buy another almost $300 music player and re-purchase all those tunes? When my iPod dies, I'll buy the next ipod, the one with the features apple has added to stay competitive with microsoft.

      And Apple just loves that fact - they have you by the [reproductive organs] forever. Apple boosters would do well to remember you next time they complain of Micro$oft lock-in.
    2. Re:Too Late by Sebastopol · · Score: 1

      and re-purchase all those tunes?

      Accordint to TFA: you may not have to---

      "Zune will import songs from Apple's iTunes "as permitted by the online service from which it was purchased," according to Microsoft."

      A bit cryptic, as I don't see Steve J giving the OK, but in light of the France interoperatbility lawsuit, we'll see.

      --
      https://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
    3. Re:Too Late by windowpain · · Score: 1

      Do you really think you're the prime market Microsoft is shooting for? You're an early adopter and you love your iPod. Maybe they'll be content to go after the 90+ percent of the population that doesn't already own an iPod. They could have an enormously popular and profitable product without making a single convert.

      --
      Insert witty sig here.
    4. Re:Too Late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree, Zune isn't dethroning iPod anytime soon. Simply because of the name and entrenchment.

      What kills me though is that all those things you said you can do with your iTunes and iPod I do without it. The catch is, I spent 130 dollars on a real .mp3 player with higher sound quality than the iPod without the DRM cockblock of iTunes.

      The software to rip CD's to .wav to .mp3 and back is all readily available for free. (www.download.com) Just use P2P software or radio to try music, and buy paraphanalia and CD's to rip yourself if you want to support your artists. Hell, some artists even allow you to download .mp3's from their website. They probably get a bigger cut from that than Apple gives them from iTunes anyways, although I have no evidence to back that claim.

    5. Re:Too Late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It's nice how you talk about being locked into Apples DRM and in the next sentence says it's unobtrusive.

    6. Re:Too Late by nuckin+futs · · Score: 1

      The software to rip CD's to .wav to .mp3 and back is all readily available for free.

      iTunes is also free, and it rips from CD straight to mp3 too. All the music in my iPod is in mp3 format.

    7. Re:Too Late by ClamIAm · · Score: 1

      I have also spent at least $300 on the iTunes music store. My Daughters have purchased much more than that. Why would I want to buy another almost $300 music player and re-purchase all those tunes?

      Sorry bud, but you (and your daughters) never "purchased" those songs. You simply entered into a contract where you get to listen to some encrypted audio files until the DRM or Apple decide to screw you over. There's somewhat of a difference.

    8. Re:Too Late by Seraphim_72 · · Score: 1

      Ah...so they are willing to crack the DRM then? Nice.

      --
      Slashdot, where armchair scientists get shouted down and armchair theologians get modded up.
    9. Re:Too Late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only on /. does someone get modded +5 for proudly bragging about their iTunes vendor lock-in...apparently it's all good as long as the vendor isn't MS.

    10. Re:Too Late by Perl-Pusher · · Score: 1

      So it's alright to get out of Apple's vendor lock in and trade it for Microsoft's?
      I'm not bragging on vendor lock in, I'm pointingg out 1st mover advantage.

    11. Re:Too Late by Perl-Pusher · · Score: 1

      So it's alright to get out of Apple's vendor lock in and trade it for Microsoft's?
      I'm not happy about vendor lock in, I'm pointing out 1st mover advantage. I have always found AAC easier to swallow than windows media. Seems less a bitter pill.

    12. Re:Too Late by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      No, it's stupid to get involved in any vendor's lock-in, especially when there's a simple and easy alternative. For music, it's called the "Compact Disc". I believe it's been around since 1983 or so, and it has far higher sound quality than AAC or WMA, and is easily and freely ripped and encoded into any compressed (lossy or lossless) or uncompressed media file format you choose (MP3, Ogg, FLAC, WAV, etc.).

    13. Re:Too Late by Perl-Pusher · · Score: 1

      $18 for 11 crappy songs to here one good one. No thanks!

    14. Re:Too Late by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      If a band only makes one "good" song on a whole CD, then maybe the whole thing is crap. I've never heard a CD where every song is bad except one. Do you listen to pop shit or something? Maybe you need to examine your taste in music and find something better.

    15. Re:Too Late by Perl-Pusher · · Score: 1

      So you assume a discerning taste is bad? Let's say the album had 5 good tracks. Pay $.99 each or $18 for the CD. Still a no brainer. Do you like all the tracks on every CD? Some people will buy anything, that's why there is marketing & ebay. Look at your last post and ask yourself "Is it me?"

  44. Zune rhymes with Loon by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

    Just though I'd mention...

    But will you have to be a goon to buy one? Or will the Zune be a boon? It depends on how the device is hewn, and will MS promise the moon? Will sales fit in a spoon, or will the consumers swoon?

    And so on...

    1. Re:Zune rhymes with Loon by cswiger2005 · · Score: 1

      My first thought was that "Zune" rhymes with "spitoon".... :-)

      --
      "The human race's favorite method for being in control of the facts is to ignore them." -Celia Green
  45. Vista? Zune? by isaacklinger · · Score: 1

    Seeing their reasons are "it's cool", "the screen's better", and my favorite, "you can program it", I think they haven't thought this through. Add to that a rosy outlook on Vista's market penetration, and it seems like any relation of the article to actual events is purely coincidental.

    (Rant: And if you care for my opinion, the portable media player is not the key to the entire consumer media market, even with the most sophisticated of DRM technology. Would consumers be willing to use their portable device to store content for their living room set-top box? Would they buy a movie if they can't watch it at a friend's house? I believe people like their entertainment hassle free, and they like to have a physical item they can identify. No menus, no dialog boxes, just pop it in and play. I simply can't see millions of consumers running Vista Media Edition or iTV in their living room, downloading movies to their Zunes or iPods and streaming them to their televisions.)

  46. Re:*snicker* by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You expect massive numbers of people to suddenly stop buying computers?

    --

    "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  47. Re:Nothing new here, mostly the old FUD and some i by Doctor+Memory · · Score: 1
    The argument is that Microsoft will leverage any installed base they have (Windows, Xbox, Soapbox) and due to a similarity with the Windows Media Center user interface and Vista will have a strategic advantage. Also their 90% share in operating systems vs 5% for Apple
    Yeah, this was definitely a "WTF?" moment for me. "Microsoft will take over a new market because they already dominate an old market." In that case, shouldn't Apple have been relegated to boutique status, since they only have a tiny share of another market? I think the author of the article is also showing his age; old people will feel comfortable with the Zune because the interface looks like Windows Media Center, kids will want something new and exciting to explore. I doubt that showing them something that looks like their TV will entice them too much.
    --
    Just junk food for thought...
  48. Price of Entry by tritone · · Score: 1

    mySpace doesn't come with a $249 price tag to join the club.

    1. Re:Price of Entry by Svet-Am · · Score: 1

      and that's part of the problem over there...

      --
      [move .sig! for great justice, take off every .sig!]
  49. Tiny Archos Gmini: better value for 50% less cost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I owned several mp3 players including Archos Gmini, Samsusng YH-920 and Ipod.

    Tiny 20GB Archos Gmini is certainly the best when it comes to the price and features. It also works with GNU/Linux out of the box, without any special drivers and/or software.

  50. Re:Nothing new here, mostly the old FUD and some i by Com2Kid · · Score: 1

    I said "zuuun", ("zuen"? Not much idea how to phonically spell words...) You know, long U, just like how English dictates it be pronounced.

  51. Don't fear the MS by GreyyGuy · · Score: 1

    Everytime Microsoft bursts into a new area, there are lots of "will they crush the current leader?" articles. They are here with Zune. They were there with both versions of the X-Box. I distinctly remember reading a large number of articles seriously suggesting that Microsoft would replace the Internet when MSN came out. Not just AOL- the entire Internet.

    So if I were Apple, I might be a bit concerned, but I would not be that concerned. And given MS's track record of security, I would start a pool to see how long it takes the first Zune virus to pop up.

  52. Fear? Ha! by norminator · · Score: 1, Troll

    The article lists five reasons why Apple may fear the Zune, and why it won't be as easily smacked down as the dozens of mp3 players before it have been.

    The Zune interface is just like a miniature version of the Windows Media Center user interface and is very similar to some elements of Vista.

    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

    *wipes tear from eye*

    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

    Good one!

  53. obtain = attain by GrayCalx · · Score: 1

    meh...

  54. Re:300 Million? Pfui! by EasyT · · Score: 1
    Like platinum records in the US represent sales of 1 million albums.

    Actually, in the US the 1 million mark is referred to as "gold". It takes sales of 10 million to go platinum.

    These thresholds vary from country to country.

    See the wikipedia article for more detail if you like: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gold_album

  55. One problem with the analogy by aztektum · · Score: 1

    Zune will probably never reach the heights of MySpace which is essentially free for all the minors that have made it so big. Mom and dad pay for the Internet. How many kids are going to afford a 300 dollar MySpace device? How many parents are going to buy their kids one when they probably already have a iPod?

    --
    :: aztek ::
    No sig for you!!
    1. Re:One problem with the analogy by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1
      Mom and dad pay for the Internet. How many kids are going to afford a 300 dollar MySpace device? How many parents are going to buy their kids one when they probably already have a iPod?
      ... Now that you put it that way, a Zune sounds better than myspace.
      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
  56. Or I could pass on both... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Am I the only person who can't stand the DRM crap that Apple's ITunes shoves down your throat?

    It seems as if Zune is just a clone of the Ipod with some limited features that few users would want to use. The article doesn't even discuss the sound quality, which is probably the only reason I ever considered purchasing an IPOD.

    After doing some research I found an MP3 player that I can just plug and play in my USB port like a flash drive, copy MP3's on, no DRM garbage, in a smaller package with a UI that's just as easy to use and arguably better sound quality than an IPOD. And I didn't have to pay for a name like IPOD or now ZUNE (check out JetAudio IAudio U2).

  57. Dear Steve, by simpl3x · · Score: 1

    You killed the Newton and its $100 dollar laptop-like brethren. You refuse to produce a reasonable tablet, in spite of many pros (people willing to spend lots of money for one) wishing that you did. Sketchbook Pro, take a look! 13 inch MacBook Pro without a keyboard... The iPod has improved, but no leaps in functionality have been really made. The MacBooks still don't have a Core 2. I'll buy one, promise! I'll even buy a 13" MacBook Super Pro. The MacPhone is somewhere in the ether; hopefully it will work with the Mac or even better Google Calendar in cool ways.

    The world is moving to devices that work together. The only cool thing about the Zune is the wireless, but not for sharing. I want to run web based widgets so that the thing becomes a pocket post-it note. Hell, put a tablet there! Zune isn't getting anywhere IMHO... But Zune 2.0!

    1. Re:Dear Steve, by FuturePastNow · · Score: 1

      Apple doesn't make products you want. Apple makes products Steve wants, and allows you to buy them.

      --
      Give a man fire, and you warm him for the night. Set a man on fire, and you warm him for the rest of his life.
  58. a perfect storm? by Phantom+of+the+Opera · · Score: 1

    and its brown?

    *dives for cover*

  59. Tempest in a tea pot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Zune interface is just like a miniature version of the Windows Media Center user interface... I've used Windows Media Center, and it sucks... I'd have to imagine a miniature version of it would suck even more. iPod has absolutely nothing to fear. At least Apple didn't name their media player after a hebrew word for a sex act!

  60. last second formating fuck up by chriss · · Score: 1

    Somehow I managed to mess up the formating of the first two arguments at the last second. It should have read:

    1. Microsoft is hatching a consumer media "perfect storm."

    The argument is that Microsoft will leverage any installed base they have (Windows, Xbox, Soapbox) and due to a similarity with the Windows Media Center user interface and Vista will have a strategic advantage. Also their 90% share in operating systems vs 5% for Apple [I think it's even less than that] will force the Zune into the market.

    I guess that is the only real argument here, but nothing new. Microsoft failed to leverage their installed base before, eg with Smartphones, where they failed miserably even though the syncing with Outlook is so important. And the 5% of Apples market share does not seem to be a problem, the majority of iPod buyers already use it with windows.

    2. The Zune is social and viral.

    The article claims that the world has changed since the introduction of the iPod, obligatory citing anything with the Web 2.0 label as social and viral and therefore claiming a demand by todays youth to be able to share immediately anything, making Zune's WiFi hip and the iPod old fashioned.

    Maybe, but I doubt it. Let's remember that P2P was big long before the iPod and iTMS, they introduced a business model that got accepted by people that were used to get everything for free due to it's ease of use. Due to Zune's DRM restrictions there will be no widespread sharing on school yards, so even if the world would demand to return to the early Napster days, the Zune will not allow this.

  61. I can't wait for the superbowl commercial by movienut · · Score: 2, Funny

    Z: "Hi i'm a Zune"
    I: "And i'm an Ipod"
    Z: "Nice to meet you"
    I: "Hey i've been meaning to ask you.."
    Z: "Shoot."
    I: "Whats with the brown color?"
    -awkward silence, toilet flushing in the background-
    I: "Ohh..... duuuuuuuuuude..."

    1. Re:I can't wait for the superbowl commercial by FuturePastNow · · Score: 1

      Man, I'd like to be watching the game at Ballmer's house when that airs. I've never seen someone throw an HDTV before.

      --
      Give a man fire, and you warm him for the night. Set a man on fire, and you warm him for the rest of his life.
  62. My deep fear (was:*snicker*) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "The company expects to have 200 million Vista users within two years." ...
    yeah right
    I am more afraid M$ could send out a silver bullet that instantly disables all the XPs and W2ks, compelling a mandatory upgrade to Vista... "as if millions of (windows users) cried out in (disblief as their windows machines) were suddenly silenced."
  63. Re:*snicker* by vertinox · · Score: 1

    You expect massive numbers of people to suddenly stop buying computers?

    Why yes. Yes I do.

    Not that it has anything to do with a nuclear war with China over the invasion of Iran...

    --
    "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
    -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
  64. Re:Nothing new here, mostly the old FUD and some i by generic-man · · Score: 3, Funny

    The Zoo-nee competes with the ipp-oh-dee, which synchronizes with it-you-ness that runs on macko-sex on my pee-ow-urb-ook.

    --
    For more information, click here.
  65. Re:Nothing new here, mostly the old FUD and some i by norminator · · Score: 1
    3. Zune may have more programming.

    The pick on Apple launching with videos only from Disney as a sign that Microsoft has more support from the movie industry. But as was discussed earlier today on slashdot [slashdot.org], this may be simply due to Walmart and soon be a problem of the past. Even worse, if Apple made a deal with Walmart, they might try to push the Zune out.

    Keep in mind that the Zune store isn't even launching with any videos (music videos/TV/movies) for now. Apple has had music videos for quite a while, TV for a while, and has had movies since 9/12. They've already gotten in good with the TV companies, less so with the movie studios, but that's coming. To say that Zune "may have more programming" is a pretty lame piece of conjecture.
  66. Re:Nothing new here, mostly the old FUD and some i by chriss · · Score: 1

    I don't know the media center interface, but similarity has not always worked out for Microsoft. The first generations of WinCE PDAs were more or less unusable, partly because the standard windows start menu simply took up ways too much screen estate. Only when PDAs got larger (in pixel) displays, it became acceptable. But still the Palm OS interface is much better suited for mobile operation, so no guarantee that the media center interface has any use on a mobile media player. Maybe even the old people that are familiar with the interface will despise it on the Zune.

  67. Larger screen, yes, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it is still only QVGA resolution, so, like iPod, widescreen movies will be letterboxed.

  68. Tallscreen? by norminator · · Score: 1

    It's funny how making a "tallscreen", then advertising that you can turn it sideways is a marketing bullet point. I guess the iPod camp can argue that in its default "tall" (portrait) state, the Zune is even worse than the iPod, since there's all that extra space on the top and bottom if you're watching a widescreen movie.

  69. soapbox!! by aquowf · · Score: 1

    yea, in the article it states that soapbox is the youtube killer. there is a link to a video about sharing, see it? yea, its youtube.


    oh well. just one flaw.

  70. One Reason Why Zune's Got Problems by corby · · Score: 5, Insightful

    1) Zune will not play back PlaysForSure media.

    Rather than build on the 20%+ marketshare of consumers that have PlaysForSure-compatible devices, Microsoft has decided to claw their way back up from a zero percent market share by refusing to implement their own standards.

    It boggles the mind. Even if they insist on introducing their own Super-Zune DRM for this device, what reason, technical or commercial, could they possibly have for not playing back PlaysForSure media as well?

    There is going to be a great deal of consumer confusion and backlash when people find out that the Microsoft-DRM music they have purchased won't play back on their Microsoft Zune device. Especially after Microsoft spent all this time assuring people that they can just buy PlaysForSure, and not have to worry about confusing codec-DRM issues.

    1. Re:One Reason Why Zune's Got Problems by mbourgon · · Score: 1

      There is going to be a great deal of consumer confusion and backlash when people find out that the Microsoft-DRM music they have purchased won't play back on their Microsoft Zune device.

      And, if Microsoft is willing to ditch their own standard, who's to say they won't ditch the Zune standard in 5 years, making whatever music you buy unplayable once your Zune dies?

      --
      "Sometimes a woman is a kind of religion, she can save your soul & set you free from all your sins" - Bad Examples
    2. Re:One Reason Why Zune's Got Problems by Retardican · · Score: 1

      It boggles the mind.

      No it doesn't. Someone up in MS finally realized that there is no way in hell there will be a DRM'ed multimedia format that you can move from PC to portable to DVD to etc... except user ripped (pirated) content. They'll do the dog and pony show with the MPAA and add a DRM format, but their true intent is pull an Apple and use generic formats. Good luck to MS to out do Apple (grin).

      --
      Will the War in Iraq get better or worse in 2007? Vote here
  71. A Better Title by SQLz · · Score: 1

    Why Microsofts marketing poeple should be blocked from submitting Slashdot articles. This post reeks of wet astroturf.

  72. iPod Killer #340,293 by mitchell_pgh · · Score: 1

    FIRST
    I would like to point out an ERROR in the article. Apple NEVER said they had 92% of music player market. A while back, they said that 92% of new hard drive-based MP3 players being sold were iPods. They recently said that they had "70% of the market for portable music players."

    I would rather have 70% of the market as compared to 92% of the hard drive based market.

    SECOND
    It's been proven (a number of times) that simply having more features DOES NOT guarantee success.

    The wi-fi feature sounds interesting, will non geeks "get it" in the same way they get the iPod? In response to the 5 reasons given in the article:

    1. Microsoft is hatching a consumer media "perfect storm."
    Perfect storm? Please show me the proven Microsoft Media Store? Where is the proven iTunes equivalent? Where is the range in the Zune product line (from a $79 player to a $300+ player)?

    2. The Zune is social and viral.
    Call me an Apple zealot, but how ISN'T the "listen three times... before you buy" scheme going to sound like a scam? If my iPod had such a feature, I would never use it, and I have three friends with iPods. The wi-fi feature for sharing music seems like a gimmick.

    3. Zune may have more programming.
    I'll believe it when I see it.

    4. Zune's screen is better for movies.
    Today... that is true. One iPod update and that's no longer true. If you notice, the top of the iPod offerings is considerably lower than it has been in the past.

    5. Zune is actually pretty cool. So is the iPod... in fact, it's been cool for about 5 years.

    "The iPod is the soul of Apple's entire business."
    Bull... Yes, it's a BIG chunk of the company, but the computer business is still strong (accounting for 60% of all revenue). People aren't buying computers ONLY because of the iPod. I'm not saying it has hurt business, but OS X on NICE hardware is appealing to customers tired of their Windows 98 and Windows Me virus ridden computers. Windows 2000 and XP solved many of the problems, but that doesn't erase the fact that many people are willing to look to different options.

    1. Re:iPod Killer #340,293 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Call me an Apple zealot

      Okay, I'll bite. You're an Apple zealot. You're getting pretty defensive considering the article is simply saying that Apple should be afraid. In fact, if they aren't afraid, you should question their management. Complacency and believing that you are invincible does not work in a competitive market and Zune will be the most competative threat they have ever faced.

      The last line of TFA says "The iPod rules -- for now. But Microsoft can't be dismissed as just another wannabe. And nobody knows that better than Apple."

    2. Re:iPod Killer #340,293 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i agree with most of your points, but you've made a serious error. It's not "listen three times before you buy", it's listen for 3 days before you buy. Big difference. Not only that, but going of past experience, people listen to other people's mp3 players. I kno my friends and I do.

    3. Re:iPod Killer #340,293 by AddressException · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's both -- whichever happens first your tracks are toast.

    4. Re:iPod Killer #340,293 by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      Actually, it shuts down on either three days or three times.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
  73. no packing by tacokill · · Score: 1

    Dude, most funds are transmitted electronically these days. Those boxes of money prolly do get heavy, though. :)

  74. As an Apple user I have to agree by l0ungeb0y · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I sold my iPod 4G over a year ago due to disuse since I work at home and don't get out much except for meetings or for nightlife, and an iPod is useless in a restaurant or a club.

    Anyway, I was looking into getting a 6G in the next week or two and read up on Zune.
    I had to say that even though it's a non-starter because it's PC only and wont work with iTunes or the iTunes music store, I found it very compelling.

    First off, it has a big screen.
    This is huge! One of my gripes and the reason why I never went in for the 5 or 6G with the photos and video stuff is because the screen is so frakkin tiny.
    I mean WTF? How could Apple, the kings of quality UI think that was sufficient? I know I'm not the only one, either. Remember the fake iPod mockups we saw online claming to be the 6G iPod, half of them showed a vastly increased screen size. Apple failed to significantly alter the display, ignoring the obvious flaw.

    Wireless!
    I can't tell you how annoying I always found it to have to take my iPod out of it's cradle that was jacked into my Home Theatre and have the music stop just so I could add some tracks/playlists to my iPod. With Apple having Airport/Airtunes and bluetooth it just seemed logical to converge that with iPod.
    Instead, Apple decided to go the cheap route and not include that sort of functionality. I mean, imagine a wifi or bt enabled iPod... sharing photos and files with other iPod users or those with BT enabled cellphones/handhelds/laptops. You'd think Apple would have seen the value in that.

    So it's good to see MS coming out with a strong offering in the MP3 player market. Apple needs a good kick in the pants to wake them up from their warm after sex glow they've had since taking the market by storm.

    1. Re:As an Apple user I have to agree by Darth+Maul · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think you need to read up on both the screen and the wireless functionality, because you'll be sorely disappointed.

      --
      --- witty signature
    2. Re:As an Apple user I have to agree by megaditto · · Score: 1

      BT is PITA to configure, and is SLOW. Even wireless is too slow to transfer anything but a few tracks.

      100 MP3 songs = 500 megabytes = 8 minutes of wireless transfer @ 10Mbps

      When was the last time you filled up your mp3 player using USB1?

      --
      Obama likes poor people so much, he wants to make more of them.
    3. Re:As an Apple user I have to agree by rreay · · Score: 1

      Other pointed out that Zune wireless isn't for syncing.

      I'll point out that the screen isn't all that different. The iPod screen is 320x240, 4:3 aspect ratio, 2.5" diagonal. The Zune screen is is 320x240, 4:3 aspect ratio, 3" diagonal. That extra 1/2" diagonal isn't worth the praise you give it.

      -rr

    4. Re:As an Apple user I have to agree by symonty · · Score: 1

      I don't think wireless syncing would even make sense,
      not only is it insanly slow, it would suck your battery dry.

      Speaking of which if you have to charge it you have to "cradle" it ..

      so sync and change at the same time, that is what you do with your mobile right
      or does it grab juice from the ether while it silently sycronizes the world via 100K BT?

      --
      -- email me @ 30,000 ft
    5. Re:As an Apple user I have to agree by Graymalkin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wireless...right...

      I think Apple's stuck with wires up to this point because they're pretty foolproof. If you want to hook your iPod up to your TV or computer you just plug it in. There's no waiting while it searches for a connection, there's no selecting some device's name, there's not even really much thought behind it. Anyone can plug something in. It's also much higher bandwidth and more reliable than pretty much any wireless system you're going to find. Bluetooth is horrifically slow for transfering large files and 802.11b isn't much better.

      There's also the question of interface. Say you want to share some files between devices. You need to turn on the sharing, select the device you want to share with (once your device has scanned for other devices), then select a file to send. Hopefully it goes right or you'll have to do half of the process over again. Now imagine doing all of this with a single directional button on a Zune. No thanks.

      --
      I'm a loner Dottie, a Rebel.
    6. Re:As an Apple user I have to agree by mrandre · · Score: 1

      It would be great to add wireless, and huge screens, and magical pixy dust, too. When your battery burns out in three hours, or the device itself is the size of a brick, I wonder how much your enthusiasm will last. Apple instead went for better battery life and larger storage in the same package. I wonder what your enthusiasm level would be when your battery runs dry...

      --
      "I don't want to achieve immortality through my work. I want to do it by not dying." -Woody Allen
    7. Re:As an Apple user I have to agree by oblivionboy · · Score: 1

      You obviously have no idea what String Theory^BS^BS^BS Zune is about. The original poster is bang on. Good luck with your career in this, if you have one. Sounds like you've bought into the FUD. String Theory^BS^BS^BS Zune IS modified to fit the experimental results. ALL the time. Anything after this is just about how it falls apart.

  75. Not MySpace. by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

    It worked for IM, after all. They just had to change the name to Text Messaging, and they can actually charge 10c per IM, because people think it's something new.

    So they just have to convince everyone that it's not MySpace, and they can sell the same shit to us all over again.

    --
    Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    1. Re:Not MySpace. by jZnat · · Score: 1

      It's called "SMS" according to all the cell phones I've ever owned...

      --
      'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
  76. One Word... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Marketing

  77. Re:*snicker* by bitt3n · · Score: 5, Funny

    you are neglecting that many users may use one installation of Vista. For example, on account of a rather freewheeling philosophy toward downloading warez, my roommate's WinXP box now has at least 26 different users, most of whom appear to live in Ukraine.

  78. "nonreplaceable lithium-ion rechargeable battery" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nonreplaceable? Is there any justification for making it nonreplaceable other than to try to force people to buy a whole new unit when the battery conks out?

  79. Re:*snicker* by truthsearch · · Score: 1

    You expect every person on the planet with a personal computer to buy a new one within the next 2 years?

  80. Re:300 Million? Pfui! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dude, you didn't even read the link that you posted. If you did, you would realize that you were wrong.

  81. Media Center What? by Crazy+Man+on+Fire · · Score: 1
    From the article:
    Apple is scared. And for good reason.

    The iPod is the soul of Apple's entire business. Apple has been relatively successful at winning converts from Windows to Mac OS X, for example, in part because its whole product line basks in the glow of iPod's success, hipness and ubiquity.

    Apple has recently and preemptively lowered the price of iPods, announced an iTV set-top box -- which will ship later than Vista -- and is probably working feverishly on a bigger-screen, wirelessly enabled iPod.

    All these efforts may not be enough to save the iPod from the Microsoft consumer media juggernaut. Microsoft has the money, the clout, the partnerships, the mind share and the market share to drive Vista, Soapbox, Xbox and Zune into lives of hundreds of millions of consumers.

    The iPod rules -- for now. But Microsoft can't be dismissed as just another wannabe. And nobody knows that better than Apple.
    If you want to talk about flops, let's talk about Media Center. I know one person who even has Windows Media Center Edition and he's never used it for anything related to media. Vista is going to beat the iTV-thingy to market, huh? Big deal. With the specs required to even run Vista, you won't be able to put your PC anywhere near your TV and still hear the speakers.

    I don't disagree that Microsoft may be launching the first portable music player that can truly compete with the iPod, but this is far from something that will kill Apple.
  82. Except no one wants it. by Oz0ne · · Score: 1

    Microsoft can push Vista out realistically because hardware vendors will bundle it. That is the only reason most people will ever run it, it offers no compelling advancements and a lot of annoyances to current xp users.

    Microsoft can't push the zune the same way. Yes, they may do some clever marketing to scoop in a good market share, but they'll have to actually EARN it by making a better product. It can be done, they might do it, I sincerely doubt it though. Apple has years of head start, and can compete with them every step of the way.

  83. Re:300 Million? Pfui! by miller701 · · Score: 1

    You provide a link that shows in the US gold = 500k, platinum = 1M, so the original poster was correct

  84. Re:Nothing new here, mostly the old FUD and some i by moonbender · · Score: 1

    Seems to me the standard pronounciation would be as in tune or punic. To be standardly pronounced as tsu:n it would have to be written Zoon as in toon, boon, harpoon.

    --
    Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
  85. Re:Nothing new here, mostly the old FUD and some i by peragrin · · Score: 1

    If you read apple rumour sites, a new ipod is coming down the works. It will have a display on the front with Touch screen controls that appear only when a finger is near the screen.

    That will be the real video ipod. And unlike MSFT Apple won't release it until they have at least the majority of the bugs worked out.

    --
    i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
  86. I'm too stupid for this. by l3v1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Apple fans are overconfident in the iPod because Apple once commanded 92% of music player market share, a number that has since fallen to around 70%. About 30 million people own iPods. But Microsoft owns more than 90% of the worldwide operating systems market (compared with Apple's roughly 5%), representing some 300 million people. The company expects to have 200 million Vista users within two years.

    Erm, excuse me, it's just me or this "reasoning" has, well, about nothing close to even start to convince me about anything at all ? This just smells so typical: we make a colution, then we try to create a problem for it, and try to convince the people that they have the problem so they will want our solution for it. And the main arguments are that a. the other major player's fans are overconfident b. they have many apples [ :) ] but we have way too many oranges c. our one will be the winner since so many people use our other product ? This is stupid. And I won't even go into detailing the really bad drm-infecting behaviour of this world-conquering new MS player since we have already talked and read about that one for a while now.

    It's so simple: if some player is really better than some other, people will buy it. Not because they are some not yet existant hypothetical Vista users, and not because they are overconfident in anything. But, if it will suck, then it will fail.

    One more thing, I'd really like to see a context like: try to guess which company's product is a text about, even if it doesn't directly mention the company. Too bad everyone will guess MS right all the time.

    --
    I am putting myself to the fullest possible use, which is all I can think that any conscious entity can ever hope to do.
  87. Re:*snicker* by aleksiel · · Score: 1

    1) how many of these computers are going to businesses? how long will it take IT departments to break away from XP and go to vista?

    2) will the generic computer makers like dell adopt vista immediately? i don't know. will they force you to use vista? if they give consumers a choice between xp and vista, how many will pick vista?

    3) will vista hit its current release date of "early 2007"? i don't really know. probably, but perhaps not. don't forget its still a few months off, so "within two years" means less than two years of actual sales.

    is it possible for them to meet their goal? sure. but imho, to do so, they'll be forcing it down people's throats, not making legitimate sales/conversions. they could get 200 million users by giving it away for free, or pushing it through windows update (kidding, but you get the point).

  88. Fear Me by arkanoid · · Score: 0

    Actually what I fear is that i won't be able to get rid of the bsod's XD

  89. I don't think you understand the functionality... by norminator · · Score: 3, Informative
    First off, it has a big screen. This is huge! One of my gripes and the reason why I never went in for the 5 or 6G with the photos and video stuff is because the screen is so frakkin tiny. I mean WTF? How could Apple, the kings of quality UI think that was sufficient? I know I'm not the only one, either. Remember the fake iPod mockups we saw online claming to be the 6G iPod, half of them showed a vastly increased screen size. Apple failed to significantly alter the display, ignoring the obvious flaw.

    The tiny screen was sufficient... for a music player. No need to have a huge, battery-sucking screen to see the currently playing track information. The 5G (There is no 6G yet, the recent Apple anouncements were for minor revisions to the 5G, a la 5.5G) is an iPod with video capabilities, but as the rumor sites have been spouting for months now, the "True Video iPod" is still coming around the corner. Battery life, I believe was one of the major issues with it, and I'm sure some of the improvements that have gone into that found the way into the 5.5G. There will be a bigger screen, it was in the works long before the Zune nonsense was a rumor.

    Wireless!
    I can't tell you how annoying I always found it to have to take my iPod out of it's cradle that was jacked into my Home Theatre and have the music stop just so I could add some tracks/playlists to my iPod. With Apple having Airport/Airtunes and bluetooth it just seemed logical to converge that with iPod. Instead, Apple decided to go the cheap route and not include that sort of functionality. I mean, imagine a wifi or bt enabled iPod... sharing photos and files with other iPod users or those with BT enabled cellphones/handhelds/laptops. You'd think Apple would have seen the value in that.

    That's great! It's too bad the Zune isn't using wireless for syncing, or for wireless music shopping. It's only for sharing music between Zunes. Good luck with that one.
  90. Re:300 Million? Pfui! by pianophile · · Score: 1

    Actually, in the US the 1 million mark is referred to as "gold". It takes sales of 10 million to go platinum

    Check out the chart on the page you linked to. It is 500K for Gold, 1 million for Platinum, and 10 million for "Diamond" (which I had never heard of before) in the USA.

    --

    'Your brain is God.' -- Dr. Timothy Leary
  91. Re:*snicker* by MightyYar · · Score: 1

    I'd wager most corporate purchases won't include Vista for a while. I don't know how many of the computers sold each year are corporate, though.

    --
    W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  92. Re:wordplay on Zune by Poohsticks · · Score: 1
    How about?

    There is no "Dana". There is only ZUNE!

    Who ya gonna call??

    --
    "The story so far: In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and has been wide
  93. Anyone speaks french... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... know why they won't have a 2nd zune (zoune) in their pants, or one for the gals... if you got two players, that will be a bi-zune? exchanging stuff? arg!

    Is there any french canadian marketing at Microsoft who seen that product name ?

    Just like the Buick 'La Crosse' ... or many other products name... this one is really funny...

    For the others... "zoune, bizoune, bisoune" all sounds like zune... which is a childish name for penis.

  94. Just more force fed BS. by Vokkyt · · Score: 1

    That article was terrible; it was like a camp director desperately trying to convince the mosquito-bitten, wet, cold, bruised, dirty, and sick campers that camp is really fun, despite all odds against it. I mean, look at some of the arguments:

    "Recipients of these shared songs will be able to play them three times for up to three days free, after which they'll have to pay to listen. Songs received wirelessly can't be shared."

    Three times? You can play the songs three times? How worthless is that? I know that in the ideal world, users would then go to the Zune Market Place and purchase it for themselves, but let's be realistic; what songs will they send? Songs they downloaded through bit torrent and the like. This "social" feature will become little more than an annoyance and people wonder why they purchased a player that has such an arbitrary limit.

    "The Zune PC connection software requires Windows XP with Service Pack 2 or Windows Vista, so Macintosh owners can't use it. "

    I'm not going to touch on the stupidity of this.

    "The company expects to have 200 million Vista users within two years.
    Apple faces the prospect of competing not with the Zune alone, but with a mighty Windows-Soapbox-Xbox-Zune industrial complex."

    I lump these together because they both make incredulous assumptions. There will be 200 million Vista users in two years only when all of the programs are made for Vista only. But that's not the issue I have with this statement. It's the assumption that people are going to switch to Microsoft's version of *__Insert Product__* when there are already perfectly good versions of that product out there. The author assumes that users are going to get a Zune because...well, there is no reason. In fact, all he says it that it does everything that the iPod does, but a little more. It's cool; why? Because he says it is.

    What the article doesn't address really is the simple fact that...30 million people own iPods already. Why would they buy another player unless it had some spectacular feature that they NEEDED? Nothing the Zune does cannot be done in some way on the iPod video, save wireless, which doesn't look to be an appealing feature. Nothing but spin here...the Zune will have to prove itself as a product; hype alone will not work.

  95. Seamless? by blamanj · · Score: 1

    Give me a break. When has Microsoft made any user experience seamless?

    What should give Apple a shiver, however, is the WiFi connection. Though I think the song-sharing idea is DOA, but what if you could power up your Zune to reach an iTunes-like site that lets you buy music whereever and whenever.

    You're watching "The OC" (or whatever kids watch these days) and as some cool new song plays, the credits roll, "Zune now to buy this song" and sure enough, when you flip on your Zune, the WiFi Zune store is featuring that song.

    As the ring-tone business has shown, you can get a lot of impulse buys when the price is low and the availability is high.

    1. Re:Seamless? by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      You're watching "The OC" (or whatever kids watch these days) and as some cool new song plays, the credits roll, "Zune now to buy this song" and sure enough, when you flip on your Zune, the WiFi Zune store is featuring that song.

      And right in the middle of transfer the battery finally gives out from having to support WiFi.

      It's an interesting idea but they sacfriced some important features (like size and battery life) to bring us one questionable one that people have not demonstrated they would desire.

      If this is not Marketechture I don't know what is.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  96. M$ vs RIAA by deamonpainter33 · · Score: 1

    yea you know it. if the Zune can "share" music wirelessly, then if i had one and my good friend had one filled with tunes...i would "share" with him his entire collection...and upload it to mine. if there is some sort of licensing thing that will protect one from sharing "illegally" (as the RIAA puts it), then so be it but, i know there will be a way around it and, who's to say microsoft will become another victim of the RIAA because of it's "file sharing" features lol. i can't wait to see the posibilities of that while Apple keeps that crap out of the IPod n keeping legal :)

    --
    "In the kingdom where everything dies, the sky is mortal."
  97. Vista Ultimate Bundle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not like it costs them $450 to put a single DVD and cardboard box on a retail shelf, so maybe they're planning to bundle Zune with each purchase of Vista Ultimate. You heard it here first!

  98. Zune? No, new product vs iPod identity by sulfur_lad · · Score: 2, Informative

    There's more to it than that. Part of it is consumer needs, but part of it is consumer desires. Apple has succeeded in creating an identity for and making the iPod desirable, even if some people that use it (of whom I know a few) don't understand what it does at all. At its core, what is it? A screen and a hard drive with a rom chip that knows how to play music files stored on the hard drive.

    Do you remember when the walkman first came out? Do you realize that most people now call any portable tape player (Panasonic, Sharp, Pioneer, whatever...) a Walkman even though it's the Sony brand? Sony did a remarkable job of taking a bunch of parts of a dictaphone and putting them together to create something ubiquitous. The also completely created the market for it from scratch. They packaged it in so many different forms that it became desirable to everyone. To see what I mean, check out this book. It's short but it's a really good history of a game-changing product, even if it was 'just a tape-player'.

    Apple has their iPod, which is just an mp3 player. That's it (at it's core, forgive the pun there). What they have done though, is take a mp3 player (nerdy gadget) and make it desirable to the masses as an accessory, just like Sony did with the Walkman. They're even updating it like Sony did, small changes with the same base. How much different was the last walkman from the first one, really? And apple is getting flack for minor updates to a successful product. Anyways, it will be interesting to see what Zune does. Is Microsoft going to take a bite out of the market that Apple created or will gaining adoption be difficult or will it fail to create its own identity and become a Microsoft iPod (like a Panasonic Walkman)? Too many bells and whistles can take buyers away if they only really want one thing: play their music. Same problem applies to most technology. So much technology is returned because users just plain can't figure it out.

    In the end I don't think it's so much about Microsoft trying to crush competition as about Microsoft trying to add a product to a successful market. It's not up to MS whether it will succeed though, in this case it will actually turn out to be a cultural decision!! (read the book, hehe).

  99. Hug my bunny by wjv · · Score: 1

    The whole article was kind of believable. Up to the point where he described comingzune.com as "cool marketing".

  100. From TFA: by norminator · · Score: 1

    I read TFA, and noticed one sentence that stood out:

    The Zune PC connection software requires Windows XP with Service Pack 2 or Windows Vista, so Macintosh owners can't use it.

    It's funny what a difference that one comma can make... maybe it should be removed to show the true intentions behind the Zune.

  101. I'll only buy one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...if i can get mine in an ugly brown color.

    I can? Really? Look out Apple! Microsoft is going to unseat your dominance.

    I hope the Zune has Ctrl-Alt-Delete buttons...

  102. :Antitrust ? ZUNE = Windows Lock In by acomj · · Score: 1

    Zune only works with windows.
    Ipod works with the 2 most popular OS's Windows and Mac. It will work with linux too, if you don't want to deal with itunes.

    The Zune is all about keeping consumers from swithing off windows, thats why they sell it so cheaply with no way to make the money back, except from keeping people buying into the windows family. Thats got to be MS's motivation, since the web and firefox make which platform you are running less and less relevant.

  103. To win, first you must divide by boyfaceddog · · Score: 1

    Microsoft doesn't need to destroy the iPod-economy with one blow, it can keep releasing failures for five or six years. Each time it releases a failure it takes a chunk of the iPod market away. Pretty soon Apple only has 50% or less of the market, then MS can concentrate on picking up the shattered pieces and taking another 15% or 20% away from Apple. All it needs is >50% and the market is theirs.

    --
    Here will be an old abusing of God's patience and the king's English.
  104. Everything is cherry, but the brown color. by cjkeeme · · Score: 1

    The thing about the Zune is that it's made by Microsoft. This is what is causing the stir in the community. It will succeed too. Microsoft has options available to them that other companies can only dream of. All in all Microsoft is lacking on innovation compared to other companies like Apple. Why might you ask? Well, there are many valid explanations for this from the fact that they have to support legacy hardware to the fact that they must worry about how they implement things in their operating systems so they don't destroy the competition.

    I believe it is evident that Microsoft is capable of releasing a great piece of hardware. Look at the Xbox360. And for those running Vista, well, it has it's quirks but all-in-all is a fantastic operating environment. The Zune is something new and while I'm not crazy about the design of the device it functionality is where it shines. I personally will not buy one for myself, but I can easily see my wife picking up one of these. One last note about the design versus the iPod. The iPod looks great out of the box, but look again in 2 or 3 months. That design really means nothing.

    If Microsoft can incorporate the Zune with the Windows media center environment (Vista Media Center or WMP 11), I forsee the Zune being a beautiful success.

    1. Re:Everything is cherry, but the brown color. by SuperKendall · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It will succeed too. Microsoft has options available to them that other companies can only dream of.

      A few billion of them, which does not gaurantee success. Is the Zune the "New Coke" of the iPod players, as an example? It could be...

      A bad idea with a lot of money behind it is called a "Train Wreck", not a success. The shore of consumerism is littered with the discarded hulls of companies made of money.

      Well, there are many valid explanations for this from the fact that they have to support legacy hardware to the fact that they must worry about how they implement things in their operating systems so they don't destroy the competition.

      I think a "don't" slipped in there by accident. Otherwise I don't think they are loosing any sleep at night over actions taken now or in the past.

      I believe it is evident that Microsoft is capable of releasing a great piece of hardware. Look at the Xbox360

      The ones with the overheating issues that Microsoft acknowledged, and is still being outsold month to month by the PS2?

      Vista, well, it has it's quirks but all-in-all is a fantastic operating environment

      It's pretty nice alright but I've been running the equivilent for a few years now with OS X. You could have had the Vista experience years ago, just as you could have had the Zune experience years back by buying an iPod.

      The Zune is something new and while I'm not crazy about the design of the device it functionality is where it shines. I personally will not buy one for myself, but I can easily see my wife picking up one of these.

      I hoped you've talked to her about that because the size is offputting. It's larger than the iPod video, which my fiance found too large - an iPod mini is the largest iPod she was willing to take.

      The only thing new is the WiFi, and that would have been exciting if in fact it were useful. But if all I can do is share a song or two for a very limited period of time on the off chance I happened to find another owner - that is not worth hours less battery life, which I can use every day I own the device.

      One last note about the design versus the iPod. The iPod looks great out of the box, but look again in 2 or 3 months. That design really means nothing.

      My first gen iPod looks good years later, and my fiance's iPod looks just fine after a year even riding around in a purse. It's called a case, and you have about a billion to choose from thanks to the gigantic third party market for iPod accessories. Actually the new nanos do not even really need a case as the alum finish (much like the mini) is really sturdy.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  105. First is not always the best by sxmjmae · · Score: 1

    Microsoft has proven that being first and best at something means nothing. Microsoft's word beat Word Perfect. Microsoft's Excel beat Quattro Pro. Microsoft's XBOX introduction into the market place. Microsoft's Internet Explorer crushed Netscape. Microsoft has often come into the game late and used the hard lessons learned by the competition and their own market presents to dominate the area. It often the case that someone comes into game late and is just dynamic enough to quickly takes the lead. In Microsoft's advantage is the large amounts of money they are willing to lose to gain the market share and drive the competition out of business. Then Microsoft has no issues with using there new found position to keep competition out of the market place.

    --
    My Sig indicates the end of the comment I posted.
  106. The DRM-Problem by radovsk · · Score: 1

    The ideas behind Zune are cool. There ARE cool people at Microsoft, sure. Except people in DRM-department. They idea was to let people share music - good idea, that would make Zune the most wanted music player at school... but with DRM??? All your stuff, which you upload to your Zune player will be packed into a DRM-container, weather it is WMA or Mp3 does not matter. People who receive music via wireless connection between Zune-players are only able to play the shared songs 3 times within 3 days. No more coolness....

  107. A Modest Proposal... by jschmerge · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I think everyone here at Slashdot recognizes the dangers that these new DRM-infested devices are introducing into modern culture, and I think we can all agree that we would prefer companies to stop producing products that restrict our freedom.

    Imagine what would happen if a company produced a portable MP3 and video player, similar to the Zune, that had P2P WiFi-connectivity, a BitTorrent client and possibly a scaled-down version of the Democracy Player . This might just cause the RIAA and MPAA to lose the ability to monitor file sharing and make it impossible to stop (unless the RIAA hires a bunch of thugs to sit in every subway car and bus across the country).

    I call on us to figure out how to produce such a device. We need to send a message to companies like Apple, Microsoft and Sony that we will not accept devices broken by DRM.

    Is anyone out there interested in helping to start a project to build and open-source piece of hardware to accomplish this?

    1. Re:A Modest Proposal... by ejp1082 · · Score: 1

      Um, the iPod, the Zune, and every other media player out there already support non-DRMed formats. And non-DRMed media is the vast, vast majority of the media that gets played by them. Neither the iPod nor the Zune do anything to restrict your freedom.

      Now, if you're stupid enough to actually purchase DRMed media - that's your own damn fault. But it has nothing to do with the devices that support playing that media.

    2. Re:A Modest Proposal... by Technician · · Score: 1

      I think everyone here at Slashdot recognizes the dangers that these new DRM-infested devices are introducing

      Word it correctly so everyone understands the first time.. Use words such as the new format is incompatible with MP3 players. Peoplel will get the idea. The new format is not compatible with their DVD player, I-pod, RCA Lyra, Car Stereo, RIO player, Winamp Jukebox, Musicmatch jukebox, I-tunes jukebox, Linux with Lame, etc.... The list goes on and on and on. MP3's work. Other formats are incompatible and won't play for sure.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
  108. Basically, I was totally wrong by EasyT · · Score: 1
    As a few people have by now pointed out, I was totally wrong with my last post (grandparent to this one). 1 million is indeed the US standard for platinum. I got my columns mixed up when I scrolled down the wikipedia article.

    Thanks to everyone who caught my error!

  109. WiMP will kill the Zune by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Windows media player will kill the Zune even if it is decent player. As a compotent Coward, who runs iTunes on my Windows box and mirrors it on my debian box, I can only walk away from any attempt at using Windows Media Player (9 or 10) with frustration and rage.
    I spent 2 hrs this AM trying to help my roommate transfer /his own/ movie onto an Archos video player via WiMP. After trying to figure out why we kept getting errors, we traced it to the fact that our firewall was blocking calls to some MS service that would verify that he was allowed to copy what he had made and owned onto the damn thing. Even once that was resolved we were stumped by the fact that WiMP consistently converted to a format that the Archos could not read unless we used a certain WMV format for the /source/ material. A format and compression that took 360x longer to compress to than MP4,Quicktime, or DivX. Never mind that neither of us could figure out how to start WiMP in 'sync' mode except by pluggining and unplugging the Archos.
    Presumably the Zune will resolve some of these issues as it will be super-glued to work with WiMP, but there will be an AMAZING amount of confusion caused by the crap that is WiMP and it's DRM madness.

    PS we suspect that WiMP hides flaws in the windows compression algos on hicontrast shots by blurring the image by 1 pixel.

  110. Microsoft Partners are the ones that worry. by guidryp · · Score: 1

    I think this going to drive a stake into all those microsoft partners that paid for play4sure licences. I would imagine they are not so impressed with this announcement and that microsoft is going to compete with them even at a loss on hardware to take market share.

    1. Re:Microsoft Partners are the ones that worry. by peter+Payne · · Score: 0

      And, there will be lawsuits down the road, you can be sure. Imagine if Apple sold a license for something, then made it worthless for some reason through their actions? They'd have to make it right, which Apple did in fact do when it purchased PowerComputing's license back when they killed the (crappy) Mac clones.

      I doubt if the /. crowd will have seen it, but the last ad Power ran was a cool jibe at Apple showing a cop pulling over a speeder (the "speeding" 250 mhz Power PC 604e, if memory serves) with the caption, "Your license, please." That ruled, definitely up there with Apple's announcement of iTunes on Windows with the caption "Hell froze over."

      --
      You've got a friend in Japan: http://www.jlist.com
  111. Missed the biggest reason by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1

    The five reasons cited are fluff. If Zune kills iPod it will be because, "Vista isnt done, till iTunes wont run".

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:Missed the biggest reason by Steve001 · · Score: 1

      140Mandak262Jamuna wrote:

      The five reasons cited are fluff. If Zune kills iPod it will be because, "Vista isnt done, till iTunes wont run".

      It seems like there are so many people devoted to the iPod that taking away the ability to use it with Windows now would drive people away from the Windows platform, rather than giving up their iPods. This would give people a reason to try other platforms.

      I think the Zune has a chance for success as long as Microsoft does not do something to kill it. Just because it hasn't/didn't take down the iPod doesn't mean that it didn't succeed. It could be that many new users (those who are purchasing their first compressed audio player) choose the the Zune over the iPod, while experienced users stay with the iPod. I think there is room for both (and other) compressed audio players.

      Among the things that could kill the Zune is if it will only play DRM songs. In fact, a great selling point for the Zune would be if it had the ability to play just about every audio format out of the box, including Ogg Vorbis, FLAC, and MP3, in addition to its own format.

      I'd like to see a player that doesn't require elaborate software to manage the library, such as the player simply mirroring a directory on your hard drive. One of the nice things about a using a CD/MP3 player is the simplicity of it, create the files with the program of your choice, burn them to a disc and use it.

  112. Re:Nothing new here, mostly the old FUD and some i by iluvcapra · · Score: 1

    I'd be honored to be the first among slashdotters to welcome our first Navajo code talker poster!

    --
    Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
  113. Re:Nothing new here, mostly the old FUD and some i by nine-times · · Score: 1

    The argument is that Microsoft will leverage any installed base they have (Windows, Xbox, Soapbox) and due to a similarity with the Windows Media Center user interface and Vista will have a strategic advantage. Also their 90% share in operating systems vs 5% for Apple [I think it's even less than that]...

    Yeah, so Microsoft will try to leverage their monopoly yet again to try to force consumers to use their products... I don't think people will necessarily buy Zune for that, but of course Apple should be scared of it. We all should be.

    My question about this is, at what point is Microsoft's metaphorical center of gravity on the other side of the fulcrum? I mean, think about the word "leverage". Lever. You have Windows, which Microsoft has leveraged into a sort of monopoly of Office, and Microsoft has in turn leveraged both of those monopolies for all sorts of other products, many of which have failed or lost a lot of money. So if Windows and Office are the weight on one side of the lever, pushing everything else up, how much weight can they put on the other side of the lever before Windows and Office aren't enough to keep them afloat?

    I don't think we're at that point yet, but sheesh, "leverage" isn't infinite.

  114. Makret share? by TheViewFromTheGround · · Score: 1
    Apple fans are overconfident in the iPod because Apple once commanded 92% of music player market share, a number that has since fallen to around 70%.

    How does Apple's market share have anything to do with Apple fanboy overconfidence? Never stopped them in the PC market.

    Anyway, there was a time, not so long ago, that Apple commanded 0% of the mobile music player market. Not only did they crush their competition, they redefined and expanded the entire category.

    --
    Online citizen journalism from the inner city: The View From The Ground
  115. i 3 coolness lol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just can't wait to have the same audio player as Steve Ballmer's kids.

  116. Social, but not viral by spideyct · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The last sentence is the key (to the Zune's loss of potential).

    If songs received wireless cannot be shared, then it cannot be viral. That is a huge limitation that will bite them.

    If it really were viral, it would have some tremendous potential to change the music scene. A small, unknown band that has a rabid fanbase could start sharing their songs. If people like it, they would share it with their friends, etc. A previously unknown band could suddenly be a hit (assuming the music was good enough to spread) and be on everyone's music list.
    Requiring people at each level to buy the song before they can share it will severely suppress the spreading of new and interesting music.

    1. Re:Social, but not viral by JWW · · Score: 1

      The last sentence is the key (to the Zune's loss of potential).

      If songs received wireless cannot be shared, then it cannot be viral. That is a huge limitation that will bite them.

      If it really were viral, it would have some tremendous potential to change the music scene. A small, unknown band that has a rabid fanbase could start sharing their songs. If people like it, they would share it with their friends, etc. A previously unknown band could suddenly be a hit (assuming the music was good enough to spread) and be on everyone's music list.
      Requiring people at each level to buy the song before they can share it will severely suppress the spreading of new and interesting music.


      You are completely correct. I can't recall any feature for a product being rendered so totally worthless by the application of DRM. Wireless file sharing is an awesome feature. Automatic addition of DRM to all wirelessly shared music however, essentially iradicates this feature.

    2. Re:Social, but not viral by mike_elgan · · Score: 2, Informative

      You make a good point: Songs purchased on the Zune Marketplace are, at best, semi-viral (as they can't make more than one hop). But pictures, notes, music files not purchased on Marketplace, videos downloaded from the Internet and illegally ripped from DVDs, etc., are perfectly viral. - Mike Elgan

    3. Re:Social, but not viral by dfghjk · · Score: 1

      and I agree too. Kids want to share music and keep it (nevermind the legality). Once they understand the sharing feature won't give them what they want then they'll just continue to want an iPod. Without Zunes being prevelent the sharing feature is worthless. Nice idea but doomed to failure due to DRM. You have to like that, actually.

    4. Re:Social, but not viral by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      videos downloaded from the Internet and illegally ripped from DVDs, etc., are perfectly viral.

      Until MS starts selling movies.

    5. Re:Social, but not viral by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Did MS change this? The last report I read said the DRM would be applied to any media you decide to share, even if it wasn't DRMed originally.

      By the way -- semi-viral?? If you want to keep the metaphor intact something that can make one hop and then stops would be like a dead virus... a vaccine? Or maybe a chemical product of bacteria... a toxin. So Zune media isn't viral, it's toxic.

  117. Microsoft could very well win by Monsuco · · Score: 1
    I don't like MS (I hate apple too, so don't get me wrong) but I think knowing how well MS can dominate the desktop, their Zune could succeed. They can easily push the Zune with advertising and would have little trouble in simply winning with bundled software. Making it so WMP could sync with the Zune out of the box would be good. They could also temporarily sell for a loss to knock out Apple. They can take losses, Apple can't. Once they get apple off the market, they can raise prices. Chances are, they will allow Napster and Rapsody back in on their DRM scheme (while at the same time killing iRiver, Gigabeat, and other Playforsure devices). They have radio and sharing while the iPod doesn't. Plus they very well could release updates that "accedentally" screw up iTunes.

    But apple will survive. They can keep selling their computers, and although apple can never dominate the market, they can keep their fans happy and thus stay in buisness (which is all they were before iPods).

  118. GO ZUNE! by 7grain · · Score: 1

    I would love to see the Zune do well in the marketplace. Best thing about the Zune is that Apple freaked out and cut prices by $50 on the new line of ipods. $249 for the new 30 gb model, and $349 for the new 80 gb model.

    Maybe the Zune will do well with the social-networking crowd (read: kids), and the ipod will remain the holy grail for purists.

    While I'll never buy a Zune, I love the competition. It keeps Apple honest, and could create a push for new features, like, I dunno, an FM tuner, bigger screen, more customizability of the menus, and PLEASE someday: wireless connectivity with my network. I would love for my iPod to be able to update itself, sitting out in my car, whenever I have itunes open on my PC and the iPod turned on. Seems like a nobrainer feature to me, but it would probably be expensive, heavy, I don't know. But very very cool, a killer app for mp3 players.

    ("never", meaning "probably never". I've explored other players that had more features and lower pricetags... they all had a fatal flaw that showed up within a couple of days. When I moved to ipod, I completely fell in love with the thing and I don't WANT to consider anything else.)

    Cheers.

  119. I'm a little late to the game here... by casualsax3 · · Score: 1

    ... but has anyone considered how fucking cool this will be when people start hacking it and running homebrew apps on it? If we're able to turn an xbox into the amazing machine it is with XBMC, imagine how cool and powerful this device could become. And again, the more portable media players that enter the market, the better they're all going to become.

  120. Expert opinion from Mike Elgan by NullProg · · Score: 1

    Mike Elgan is a technology writer and former editor of Windows Magazine.

    I'll wait for a neutral review from a expert who reports on the players from all manufacturers. I'd also like to read a disclamier about what stocks the author might own (be it Apple, Microsft, Creative etc).

    Enjoy,

    --
    It's just the normal noises in here.
    1. Re:Expert opinion from Mike Elgan by mike_elgan · · Score: 2, Informative

      Hi -- Mike Elgan here.

      You *should* "wait for a neutral review from a expert who reports on the players from all manufacturers."

      My article is perfectly useless for choosing which media player to buy. Personally, I'm an iPod *freak* (my family of four owns six iPods).

      The purpose of my column was to point out a colossal disconnect between Apple on the one hand, and the Apple faithful on the other. I have noticed my fellow iPod enthusiasts "pointing and laughing," as I put it, at Microsoft's entry into the media player market. The conventional wisdom is that Microsoft hasn't a prayer.

      My article points out that Apple itself isn't laughing. Zune is a serious threat to Apple's profitability, media player market share and "aura" of invincibility. Microsoft isn't just another wannabe. They're deadly serious and are betting the company on their consumer media strategy, which includes the Zune.

      I never said Zune is better than iPod. I said Apple is scared of what the Zune (and the rest of Microsoft's consumer product line) will do to their business.

      Mike

  121. P.S. by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I left out another goofy part of the article:

    Even if Apple is able to retain its lead, it could still be hurt -- badly -- by the Zune, which will capture mind share, grab market share and squeeze Apple on pricing.


    Disregarding the premade conclusion here that Zune will mysteriously capture mind share and marketshare, if anybody's doing the price squeezing, it's Apple, whose lowered iPod prices caught Microsoft off guard. Apple has the established relationships with manufacturers and the cheaper contracts as a result, and they're not selling each iPod at a loss. Every step of the way is an uphill battle for the Zune.
    --
    "Sufferin' succotash."
    1. Re:P.S. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting
      I left out another goofy part of the article:

      You forgot another one: the authors persistent claims "Apple is scared" which he sets out as truth when he has absolutely no proof. He thinks they should be scared, fine. Milton thought Lumberg should be afraid he was going to burn the building down, but that doesn't make it so. The author chalks the recent Apple price drop up to Apple fears, but the reality is it was right on schedule, they've been dropping prices regularly when the capacities don't increase. If MS failed to see this coming they've completely failed to do their research.

    2. Re:P.S. by d34thm0nk3y · · Score: 1

      Disregarding the premade conclusion here that Zune will mysteriously capture mind share and marketshare,

      If by mysterious you mean the result of a huge PR campaign...

    3. Re:P.S. by I'm+Don+Giovanni · · Score: 1
      if anybody's doing the price squeezing, it's Apple, whose lowered iPod prices caught Microsoft off guard.

      Then again, it could be argued that Zune is what prompted Apple to lower its price in the first place. Apple's already getting it's prices squeezed and Zune hasn't even been released yet.

      Apple has the established relationships with manufacturers and the cheaper contracts as a result, and they're not selling each iPod at a loss.

      Microsoft is establishing those same relationships for Zune (in case you haven't noticed). Here's just one example:
      http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/28/vaf-researchs-o ctavio-speaker-dock-a-hifi-for-zune/
      --
      -- "I never gave these stories much credence." - HAL 9000
    4. Re:P.S. by dfGHJkLIOPM99 · · Score: 1

      You're right man: because they will have to sell their hardware at a loss, MS will NEVER challenge nintendo and sony with the XBOX. Never! Oh wait. Nevermind.

    5. Re:P.S. by Mrrt · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Ah but MS sells the Xbox at a loss and makes it up on sales of expensive games - I believe an Xbox owner has to buy 7 or so games for MS to break even on their console purchase.

      MS can't do the same with music as at 99c there is very little margin left after the music companies take their pound of flesh from each purchase.

      -Mart

    6. Re:P.S. by shawb · · Score: 1

      What PR campaign? I haven't seen a single Ad for Zune... granted I don't sit in front of the TV all day, but I do watch a couple shows and whatnot. When I do a Google search for "zune" I get a "did you mean zone" message followed by a few reviews on tech sites. Nothing like the all out assault of the dancing silhouettes with the white iPods. Even a google search for silhouettes has as it's fourth entry the wikipedia entry on the iPod commercial. I don't think I'll see anybody dressing up as the Zune mascot this halloween, but I have seen a number of people dressed in all black with black facepaint and an iPod in previous years. The commercials for iPods generally represent a large number of underground artists who are poised to break it big, or classic artists that are poised for a comeback (there are exceptions, but...?) The commercials for Zune that I just found had extremely blah nonedescript music and animations that, while they could be considered cute, are simply not memorable or easilly identifiable with the brand (And the fact that I had to actively search for the commercials really means the ad campaign has virtually no penetration.)

      This is going to be like all of the other iPod killers out there... remember, if someone hears what your product does and instantly compares itself to another product, that product has and will mantain market dominance for the foreseeable future, probably untill they make a severe PR or technical blunder.

      --
      I'll never make that mistake again, reading the experts' opinions. - Feynman
    7. Re:P.S. by shawb · · Score: 1

      Since they came out, prices of iPods have dropped before the pre-holiday shopping season if there was not a major advance for the time being. Apple's pricing scheme indeed fits right in with their history of pricing. Zune, however, will be sold for a loss. This articlehas Scott Ericson, the senior marketing director for Zune flat out saying they don't plan to make money this year. It looks like they are using the good old Xbox strategy of... lose money on every unit. Except by the time manufacturing costs come down enough fot the $249 price point to be profitable, Apple will have already reduced the price again (while still making a profit) or come out with an upgraded version of the iPod at around the same price point.

      People might wonder why Microsoft is getting into the businesses, but to me it seems they are really pulling a reverse monopoly tactic. Yez, they are leveraging the profits they make in one market to enter another. But they are not entering the other market in order to make a profit, they are more likely entering the other markets in order to increase tie in on their primary market (Windows.)

      --
      I'll never make that mistake again, reading the experts' opinions. - Feynman
  122. Im scared by TRRosen · · Score: 1
    The Zune interface is just like a miniature version of the Windows Media Center user interface
    And we all know what a blockbuster success that has been. now if only they would come out with a portable version of BOB.
  123. Re:Nothing new here, mostly the old FUD and some i by The+boojum · · Score: 1

    TFA links to a site, called "Coming Zune", which suggests that it's just "zoon", to rhyme with "soon".

  124. But what is myspace? by Snaller · · Score: 1

    After having browsed it for 30 seconds I decided that if they can't explain what they do plainly, its probably of no use.

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  125. s/Apple/Microsoft/g by Fatal+Darkness · · Score: 1

    "[...] Microsoft fans are overconfident in the Windows OS because Microsoft once commanded 92% of dekstop operating system market share, a number that has since fallen to around 70%. About 200 million people own Windows PCs. But Apple owns more than 90% of the worldwide music player market (compared with Microsoft's roughly 0%), representing some 30 million people. [...]"

  126. Microsoft needs to learn the lesson of ... by kalidasa · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Microsoft!!! The first thing that will happen is some clueless parent will buy his or her kid a Zune for Christmas to replace an overstuffed iPod, and after an hour or two of trying to get the kid's DRMed iTunes music to play on the thing, it will be "what the hell good is this?!!!" Rather like trying to install those Word for Windows floppies from work on your brand new Mac back in the early 1990s.

    1. Re:Microsoft needs to learn the lesson of ... by Technician · · Score: 1

      My son just learned the hard way there are incompatible file formats for audio. He just got an RCA Lyra player (much cheaper than a Nano and easly expande by an SD card slot unlike a Nano. The took the MP3's from his computer CD rips and stuffed them on. It worked Stuffed in some WMA files and headed over to his GF's home to show off the new toy. She has a Nano. She likes some of his music and he likes some of hers. It was just natural for them to connect the player to her computer and copy off some music and copy some other music onto the player. (I love players that attach as a flash drive) They discovered MP3's are compatible and WMA files won't play on a Nano and AAC files won't play on the Lyra. I sugested she use CDex for ripping her CD's and I suggested to my son to do the same instead of using Windows Media Player some of the time. They caught on very quickly what does not work and MP3's do. Users of the Zune will quickly catch on also. Lyra can connect as a USB flash drive and you can copy non-DRM files to and from the device. If the Zune won't do the same wirelessly but installs with a 3 day 3 play trial, then Zune users will use a PC and load MP3's instead by a cable. Kids on a limited income are smart enough to find and use what works.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
  127. OS? How about compatability? by SeaFox · · Score: 1
    About 30 million people own iPods. But Microsoft owns more than 90% of the worldwide operating systems market (compared with Apple's roughly 5%), representing some 300 million people.


    And? So what if Apple only has 5% of the opertaing system market, the iPod is compatable with Windows too, and using it is just as easy as using it with a Mac!

    So what we really have is Microsoft's Zune is compatable with 90% of desktop computers and the iPod is compatable with 95% of desktop computers (not counting the Linux users who use third party software to use iPods).
    1. Re:OS? How about compatability? by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1
      And? So what if Apple only has 5% of the opertaing system market, the iPod is compatable with Windows too, and using it is just as easy as using it with a Mac!
      I disagree. I think the Mac version is easier.
      So what we really have is Microsoft's Zune is compatable with 90% of desktop computers and the iPod is compatable with 95% of desktop computers (not counting the Linux users who use third party software to use iPods).
      That's assuming Microsoft will require special software to copy music to the device, like the iPod. Then again, they might do something most other companies have done, and just let you copy it directly to the device drive (appearing as a standard USB drive -- which would make it compatible with most OSes) with no fuss.

      (Un?)fortunately the iPod doesn't let you just copy your music or such to the iPod so you can play it. You have to run some special software todo it for you.
      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
    2. Re:OS? How about compatability? by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      Not quite. Neither supports Windows 95/98/ME, and there are still quite a few Win98 users out there. iTunes works on Windows 2000, XP or Vista; apparently Zune will not work on 2000 or XP without Service Pack 2.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
  128. Battery life, 802.11b/g & authenication by metoc · · Score: 1

    I wonder what the battery life of a Zune player is with wireless enabled. Some sites are reporting 6 hours without wireless. Users could save battery life by manually turning the wireless on and off. What about authentication? Does each user have to authenticate every other user? What about free loaders? I imagine a scenario where users meet and start pulling out their Zunes to turn on the wireless, then start asking each other what is your Zune called? 'I see ten on my list and there are only 4 of use here? Are you 'fluffybunny' or 'sk8ergirl'?

    Also given M$ history, how long before users start getting their Zunes hacked.

  129. Lame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who cares how many Vista users there will be? iTunes will still run on it. Plus the Mac. So iTunes > Windows.

    The DRM in Zune is also unacceptable. Restrictions on ripped music? I don't think so.

    Wireless is nifty, kind of like what we have with airtunes but portable, but not compelling.

    I just don't see it making any converts. Might suck in some new users. But too many cluefull will avoid it.

  130. Only 2 reasons to ever fear microsoft by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    1 - bazillions of dollars
    2 - virtual monopoly

    And perhaps #3.. patience.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  131. crazy by benicillin · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    u people are absolutely crazy. in terms of market share and size and monetary value (and, for that matter, anything else that matters at all) myspace owns and so does microsoft. the haters out there need to just get over it. apple was cool when they were the only ones making a portable music player. ipods are stupid because they practically necessitate ITunes (the biggest piece of crap software ever made) and since everyone already has windows zune will be a breath of fresh air for the, what, 90% of the market that own a windows pc... hope you all enjoyed the "apple is cool and different" phase, cause its about to be overrrrrrrr "ah, nuprin. little. yellow. different" -wayne's world

    --
    "i stand on the edge of destruction" -shai hulud
  132. Natural and seamless...Microsoft?! by ottffssent · · Score: 1

    Let's see. If Microsoft made an ipod without the godawful itunes tie-in, and with better build quality, I'd be interested. Hell, I'd pay more than what an ipod costs for it. But they won't. Their aim is, apparently, "natural and seamless". But this is Microsoft we're talking about, who for all their UI research can't get it through their skulls that more is not better. Even Apple has been seduced by the dark side, and has photo and video and PIM crap and such clogging up their interface. And yet, they still can't play audiobooks decently without some fancy software hack.

    Microsoft is going to look at the ipod and figure it out completely wrong but they'll charge forward boldly in the wrong direction with a bag full of Microsoft 1st generation product goo. Then the second generation will fix some of the problems of the first while continuing not to get the point. Call me in 2010 when maybe someone will be making an audio player that plays audio just right. It can be done. I have faith. I've used software where features that I think should exist do, and they're readily findable. It's wonderful. Someone fetch me this piece of the future and I will pay. Please.

  133. All in time by Lars512 · · Score: 1

    I'm sure a mod will be made in no time which would allow copying of files between Zunes without DRM. Who would prevent it? Not Microsoft, since they'd benefit most. Of course they can't ship a player without restriction on file sharing and still keep the music companies on board. They can however sit back and watch once the damage is done later.

  134. cool marketing? by Aranel+Alasse · · Score: 1

    true. I mean, maybe it's just me, but I sort of expected to learn something about zune by going to the website... um... but I did see some birds go psycho and dance around while on fire! can't say I expected to ever see that, in life.

    But while I DID like the psycho bird video, I still don't know anything more about zune.

  135. 73% by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    73% of the MP3 player market overall.

    90% of the hard drive based player market.

    Yes that is of all "MP3" players.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:73% by krell · · Score: 1

      Where's the information for that? I'm wondering because neither the Zune or iPod is being promoted for its MP3 file abilities.

      --
      Where were you when the voynix came?
  136. Further reason the OS share does not matter by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Microsoft has 90% of the worldwide OS marketshare...

    And iTunes runs on ALL of those desktops!

    That's why the OS share really does not matter, as Windows is just another enabler for ITMS and the iPod.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  137. Ties between Zune and Vista by slapys · · Score: 1
    Microsoft is putting more of their weight behind the Zune than most people realize. This device is the reason that the company has heavily integrated DRM into Windows Vista. Microsoft executives have realized that if the portable MP3 player market is large enough to make Apple profitable, then it is definitely worth investing in. The Slashdot community is hyper-sensitive about DRM, and quickly points out how deeply it will be integrated into Windows Vista and the Zune. What really matters, though, is that until this point, it has been successfully implemented such that it does not bother the average user (for example, iTunes).

    All of this is about to change. Microsoft is going to make its restrictions apparent to everyone who uses Vista OR the Zune. For example, every time someone receives a song on the Zune wirelessly, and tries to listen to it more than three times, she will realize that 1) this restriction has been built into the unit, and 2) this inclusion was a conscious choice by the company that designed it. The restriction may frustrate her, or it may not, but what matters is that DRM has entered the awareness of the general public.

    What many Slashdot readers may not realize is that many of the companies who negotiate DRM contracts have little control not to do so. Most music studios would probably not have approached the iTunes music store if Apple had not assured them that their DRM would keep their profit margins safe. Similarly, while Microsoft is a large company, it cannot force contracts with media studios. It must negotiate just like everyone else. The tradeoff they decided to make was to integrate DRM into Windows Vista (decreasing its value) in exchange for contracts with studios to make it possible to launch the Zune and play music on it (increasing its value).

    This decision will significantly affect the world of computing in two related ways:
    1. DRM will irreversibly enter public awareness.
    2. As people become aware of the limitations DRM places on Windows Vista, people will investigate other ways to use computers, strengthening the open source movement.
  138. 3 technical corrections. by Cybert4 · · Score: 1

    Come on guys! We have to deluge anyone who makes a technically wrong argument with redundant ego-inflating corrections! Is this not /.? I want 6 or 7.

    And by the way, 1+2=4.

    1. Re:3 technical corrections. by jfengel · · Score: 1

      Hey, thanks. It's always kinda depressing to make a minor misstatement and get swamped with people who are so happy to make the correction that they don't bother to note that it's already been corrected, all while missing the key point (the fact that it does have a few draws).

  139. Reason the screen is larger by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Because the device itself is also larger. Generally people prefer smaller devices over a slightly larger screen. Look at the evolution of just about any portable consumer electronic device, they all have gotten much smaller over the years.

    I actually do not know for sure if the Zune has a larger screen because the device is larger, or if they made the device larger to accomidate a larger screen. But either way the end result I don't think will be desirable for a lot of people when they can buy the smaller iPod.

    It would be a somewhat different story if the resolution were higher.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  140. What is the name that device? by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    I would be far more interested in listening to short wave than any American FM station, and really it seems like that would be a great radio to have in an emergency.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  141. Mindless Apple-haters out in full force by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I notice you're getting downmods for absolutely no reason. Apparently, these mindless Apple-haters don't even care when a Microsoft advertisement piece, which this article is, doesn't even use correct statistics. The iPod hasn't lost marketshare a single year since its release. To claim it went from 90% to 70% is a complete, flat-out lie. Sorry, Apple-haters.

  142. Microsoft will never be Cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    "Microsoft will make the movement of media between Windows, Soapbox and the Zune natural and seamless. The Zune interface is just like a miniature version of the Windows Media Center user interface and is very similar to some elements of Vista"

    Windows Media Center?? Who uses this - no one I know or even don't know has ever said PEEP
    about their cool new windows media center box! Tivo on the other hand.....

    Bottom line here is that Zune will fail because M$ is not cool, I repeat, MICROSOFT IS NOT COOL.
    They and their products are nerdy, stuffy, and buttoned up just like Bill Gates.
    Zune is a stupid name, the product does not look, and will not look or be as cool as an iPod.

    Who buys iPods, KIDS - WHY? Because they are cool. Other people have iPods, but the mass marketshare
    are kids and parents buying for their kids. Wearing an iPod is cool, the iPod is just cool - whether it plays
    movies, music or transfers files is not the point or the issue. It's a fashion item, not technology.

    Parents who buy their kid a Zune this xmas are going to be hated when the kid comes home after being
    ridiculed and asks why they didn't just get the an iPod!? The zune will be dead by next xmas.

    Apple will never be scared of the tiny share of people that think M$ is cool.

    1. Re:Microsoft will never be Cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. Is there *any* Microsoft software which is "natural and seamless"...?

  143. Re:Nothing new here, mostly the old FUD and some i by Cybrex · · Score: 2, Informative

    While it's not wireless, the current iPod dock includes S-Video and mini stereo jacks on the back and an IR receiver on the front, and comes with an IR remote control. There are a couple of TV shows that I get off of the iTunes store, as well as videos that I've imported into iTunes from other sources. To watch them on our TV I skip the computer entirely. I just dock the iPod and watch. I only watch a few shows, so it's actually cheaper for me to buy individual episodes than to pay for cable TV.

    The connection is clean so I lose no fidelity, (either video or audio). The dock itself is tiny and sits out of the way on top of the entertainment center.

    --
    Boundless Expansion, Self-Transformation, Dynamic Optimism, Intelligent Technology, Spontaneous Order- BEST DO IT SO!
  144. PR plant... Launch promo begins by aJester · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Anyone notice how MANY times the writer references MySpace?

    He is trying to RELATE zune to MySpace which has become a tremendous hit among teens and youths. By repeating the references throughout the article, he is making that invisible connection in the reader's subconscious mind.

    This is DEFINITELY a PR piece written by Microsoft PR group.
    I guess this is one of the first salvo, before they launch the product.
    There will be more like it... and we will be inundated with these opinions from these so-called tech gurus....

    After reading a dozen such reviews, the teens will think that zune probably is good.

    Jester

  145. Re:*snicker* by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 1

    PC sales are expected to decline through 2007. On the other hand, Mac sales are predicted to increase.

    As for Zune, well, absolutely nobody wants one. Even the name sucks. "Zune?" It sounds like a yuppie protein drink. iPod is at least evocative of computers and the internet, with the "i" prefix.

    --
    "Sufferin' succotash."
  146. To win, first you must win! by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Microsoft doesn't need to destroy the iPod-economy with one blow, it can keep releasing failures for five or six years.

    Or ten, or a hundred!

    Each time it releases a failure it takes a chunk of the iPod market away.

    Or possibly just all the other HD based players in the market with the iPod marketshare continuing to eat into that meager pie.

    Pretty soon Apple only has 50% or less of the market, then MS can concentrate on picking up the shattered pieces and taking another 15% or 20% away from Apple. All it needs is >50% and the market is theirs.

    Step 1: Capture 50% of market.
    Step 2: Profit!

    I'm glad we've eliminated any question out of the formula. It seems so obvious now, to win, you must first win!

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  147. The key difference is... by jouvart · · Score: 1

    ... that myspace costs zilch and has little barrier to entry. Zune costs $249.99 and definitely isn't as "cool" as an ipod (there's your social barrier). This article is pure FUD.

  148. marketing looks cool by crashelite · · Score: 1

    "Zune marketing looks cool, too."

    i am sorry but i would take a Ipod ad over any of those any day. the 1st one made me say WHAT THE F&$% and then the 2nd one i was waiting for either the guy to smash the little guy or the bunny to eat him or something after the 2 birds on fire what was the 1st one... it doesnt even have the product in the video at all... so how are the Ad's cool? if any one else thinks they are cool let me know cause i would love to back hand you!

    --
    (yes i know i suck at spelling fell free to correct my grammar and/or spellin i dont care, im still not going to change
  149. Re:Nothing new here, mostly the old FUD and some i by Com2Kid · · Score: 1

    That is how I say it, rhymes with tune. Zune.

  150. OOH Cheeper iPods! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OOH Cheeper iPods!

    Thanks Microsoft!

  151. Re:Fear? Ha! by Johnzo · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hoo boy, yeah. You could give QuickBasic to a syphillitic chimpanzee and he'd come up with something slicker than Windows Media Player.

  152. Marketing does not mean success by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    I don't like MS (I hate apple too, so don't get me wrong) but I think knowing how well MS can dominate the desktop, their Zune could succeed. They can easily push the Zune with advertising and would have little trouble in simply winning with bundled software.

    People put way to much faith in what marketing can do.

    Are you yourself so easily swayed? No? Now multiply that by EVERYONE. Marketing is not what is selling iPods at this point. It's what gets you the first ten percent of the market who are then your judge and executioners.

    Bundling Windows Media Player does not help them really because people still have to buy the device. It's not like the browser whre you could bundle it and you were done. It also does not help because a lot of people already use iTunes and will install it to support iTunes they already have, which perpetuates the sales.

    Making it so WMP could sync with the Zune out of the box would be good. They could also temporarily sell for a loss to knock out Apple.

    Oh they are taking a loss - on each player, and on the conversion of every song in an iTunes library into Zune files at Microsofts expense!

    As for syncing with WMP, it probably will - oh except for those "PlaysForSure" WMP files. Not like that's confusing or anything, I can just imaging the support calls "but te only files that will not play say PlaysForSure!".

    They can take losses, Apple can't.

    Apple has a few BILLION dollars in cash sitting around, and the majority of the market. Apple does not have to take a loss, they could just trim margins a little reducing the price of the iPod and watch Microsoft squirm. Oh wait, they already have.

    Also how much can Microsoft continue to loose on Zune while they are also supporting XBox losses? Remember they are a public company.

    But apple will survive. They can keep selling their computers, and although apple can never dominate the market, they can keep their fans happy and thus stay in buisness (which is all they were before iPods).

    That violin has been playing for a long time now but at this point it's kind of out of iTune.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  153. Yes by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Am I the only person who can't stand the DRM crap that Apple's ITunes shoves down your throat?

    Yes because the rest of us realize we can simply use MP3's with the iPod, and encode video ourselves to play on it.

    Apple does not "shove", they "tempt" (which is ironically fitting for an "Apple"). You don't have to go there.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  154. It's not lame by Headcase88 · · Score: 1

    Has wifi. More space than a Nomad. Awesome.

    --
    "When the atomic bomb goes off there's devastation...but when the atomic bong goes off there's celebraaaaation!"
  155. Network Backbone by SMACX+guy · · Score: 1

    Of course we'll bundle our MorganNet software with the new network nodes; our customers expect no less of us. We have never sought to become a monopoly. Our products are simply so good that no one feels the need to compete with us.

  156. Promoted by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Where's the information for that? I'm wondering because neither the Zune or iPod is being promoted for its MP3 file abilities.

    Yes but they and the market they are in is still widely referred to as "MP3" players. Otherwise Zune would have 100% of the "Zune market" which would be madnesss.

    I got that figure a bit wrong, it was over 75% (as of 2Q 2006). There are other studies as well.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  157. No one ever survived believing MS marketing data by gelfling · · Score: 1

    Yes. No one has ever survived believing prerelease product information from MS. Ever. Whatever they tell you about what it's GOING to do is wrong, incomplete, a future statement or a lie. The fact is that Zune will be a 1.0 product. It will be incomplete, broken or worse. MS really doesn't care about the Zune because Zune is no more than a temporary 'product' that's meant to slow Apple down and no more.

  158. Re:Nothing new here, mostly the old FUD and some i by jZnat · · Score: 1

    I think you pronounce it like "tune". You know, the whole fucking reason why it's called "Zune"...

    --
    'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
  159. Why don't we have a new section or icon for... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    'Sacred burial grounds of articles touting a new iPod killer' and be done with it?

    To make it complete, Slashdot will have a script that will regurgitate all these comments so that we can move on with our lives.

    Oh, and technical writers? Try to avoid the buzzword 'seamless'. The last time it was used correctly was back before the product came out of beta, and one techie said, 'Transferring from Zune to Zune seemed less troublesome during our tests...'

  160. Zooooooon---George W. Bush says: by woohootoo · · Score: 1

    Bring it on!

  161. 0.5" makes a "BIG screen" ???!!! by michaeldot · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "First off, it has a big screen.
    This is huge!"

    Sounds like someone has fallen for marketing obfuscation.

    iPod is 2.5", Zune is 3.0", both have a 320x240 resolution. That's a half inch difference and the resolution is the same, so the Zune has chunkier pixels and cannot display any more information.

    Also, neither are optimal for extended movie watching. The PSP's 4" screen at 480x272 (16:9) resolution is about the smallest size that is comfortable for a 2 hour movie (aside from the fact that Sony in their infinitely stupid wisdom have hobbled it regular MPEG-4 movie have to be at 320x240 or 368x208 resolution, making the movie less sharp due to upscaling).

    1. Re:0.5" makes a "BIG screen" ???!!! by dfghjk · · Score: 1

      The Zune screen may be "chunkier" but I'd hardly call 133 dpi "chunky". If you think 133dpi is bad, I can't imagine what you'd say about the 100dpi displays that are found in all macs. I've had Dell notebooks with 130+ dpi displays and most people think the pixels are too small. I don't agree but that's another matter.

      The fact is that the Zune has 44% more display area than the iPod and that's a good deal. I agree that I'd like an even bigger display but not if the device will be bigger. Not all video usage on these devices is 2+ hour movies. I use mine to watch TV shows while doing cardio and I'd much rather have 3" than 2.5".

    2. Re:0.5" makes a "BIG screen" ???!!! by tuxedobob · · Score: 1

      Apple could release a single-pixel iPod screen that's 4" diagonal. It may not actually show more information or have a crisper picture, but hey, it' sure have more "display area".

    3. Re:0.5" makes a "BIG screen" ???!!! by dfghjk · · Score: 1

      I think I addressed that issue with screen dpi. The Zune screen has plenty of resolution for 3". If the screen were 4" the resolution would still be 100 dpi, the same as every mac display. A 4" QVGA would be fine for video. Maybe Apple will "invent" it soon.

      Apple wouldn't release a 1 pixel display, they'd release a 0 pixel display and call it a feature. If you don't agree, look at the Shuffle.

  162. (You) people actually trust MS to handle media? by Tibor+the+Hun · · Score: 1

    OK,
    first of they're more interested in DRM rather than delivering media.
    Secondly, look at their attempts at media management on PCs...
    The mighty Windows Movie Maker which can't even burn a DVD.
    The mighty WMP which weighs about a ton of RAM and makes you do the "wtf, where did that title bar go?" twist every time you use it.
    Their awesome solution towards digital photo management-- google picassa.
    The simplicity of importing video and photos into your computer "Please insert the driver disc"
    And once again, let me mention the allmighty Windows Movie Maker which cannot burn your movies to a DVD!
    WTF?

    And what of their Media box? Any of your friends with careers excited, or talk about the PC in the middle of the living room that manages their media?

    Yes, Zune has a pedigree of a 2nd rate dog (Xbox) and a 3 legged mutt (MS.)

    --
    If you don't know what AltaVista is (was), get off my lawn.
  163. Microsoft will hurt Apple with this product by 517714 · · Score: 1

    The Zune will sour people on any product that it is remotely like. Microsoft will never get a significant market share, but they will poison the market. Thus far it is Microsoft who has been squeezed on the pricing front.

    "1. Microsoft is hatching a consumer media "perfect storm.""
    If a perfect storm is when hot air meets vaporware.

    "2. The Zune is social and viral."
    So is herpes. The difference is that while herpes is "the gift that keeps on giving", Zunes tunes won't spread far.

    "3. Zune may have more programming."
    The world may end tomorrow, but neither is likely.

    "4. Zune's screen is better for movies."
    Better, but completely inadequate.

    "5. Zune is actually pretty cool."
    Brown is soooooo cooooool!

    --
    The US government have made it clear that we have no inalienable rights; any we do not defend vigorously will be taken.
  164. Scared to the core? by Rodness · · Score: 1

    Yeah, with Apple having ONLY 75% of the market share for portable music players, I'm sure they're just absolutely terrified.

  165. And its made by microsoft by AntiTrust,+AntiMicro · · Score: 2, Funny
    I think this quote from The Tao of Programming sums up my feelings about Zune.

    The Magician of the Ivory Tower brought his latest invention for the master programmer to examine. The magician wheeled a large black box into the master's office while the master waited in silence.

    ``This is an integrated, distributed, general-purpose workstation,'' began the magician, ``ergonomically designed with a proprietary operating system, sixth generation languages, and multiple state of the art user interfaces. It took my assistants several hundred man years to construct. Is it not amazing?''

    The master raised his eyebrows slightly. ``It is indeed amazing,'' he said.

    ``Corporate Headquarters has commanded,'' continued the magician, ``that everyone use this workstation as a platform for new programs. Do you agree to this?''

    ``Certainly,'' replied the master, ``I will have it transported to the data center immediately!'' And the magician returned to his tower, well pleased.

    Several days later, a novice wandered into the office of the master programmer and said, ``I cannot find the listing for my new program. Do you know where it might be?''

    ``Yes,'' replied the master, ``the listings are stacked on the platform in the data center.''
    .....The Tao of Programming
  166. Re:Nothing new here, mostly the old FUD and some i by dfghjk · · Score: 1

    "That might even make it a breach of license agreement for creative commons licensed music, because they demand that if you give a track to someone else, that person has to be able to pass it on, impossible with the Zune."

    Zune doesn't give tracks to anyone, what it gives is a limited preview. In order to give the track to someone, you have to use a different method. In any case, the burden is on the user.

    "Due to Zune's DRM restrictions there will be no widespread sharing on school yards, so even if the world would demand to return to the early Napster days, the Zune will not allow this."

    I agree with this. What kids want is unlimited sharing. Zune's version isn't appealing to them.

    "There have been a lot of other media players already featuring larger screens, so this alone does not seem to be a reason for customers to switch."

    Yes, but all those players are significantly bigger than the iPod. Zune is the same size but with a bigger screen. Watching video on an iPod does suck pretty much so a larger screen would be welcome. I'm not convinced it is larger enough. I sure don't want one.

  167. Bloat by dindi · · Score: 1

    Zune is BLOAT, ipod is mainly a music player.

    I even feel the ipod is a BLOAT, especially with iTynes piggybacking on it, but hey, it is small, has decent battery life, and plays my electronic tunes while I am running or lifting weights....

    A Zune? I wanna see the battery life, and the size of that box. For sure you won't run with that strapped onto your arm and sweat into it like a pig ....

    as a media player (for video and all that) maybe it rulez. For a music player: it just sucks probably. ...

    I do not want to see 5-inch size movies, I just need MP3 so if apple wants my opinion: i keep my ipod and do not care for zune.

    On the other hand as soon as it crpas out I just get something half the size of an ipod, with twice the capacity, for 75% of the price with a 100% better software. Something that works on linux and does not need 2 upgrades of 80megs a month twice ...

    just my 2c. Run and buy the bloat box if you want :)

  168. Re:Nothing new here, mostly the old FUD and some i by dfghjk · · Score: 1

    I'm not defending it because i don't agree either, but Apple succeeded with iPod against entrenched competition partly because of it's superior integration with it's computers. Remember that the 1G iPod did not support Windows and Apple marketed it specifically as part of the "mac experience". Not really that much different.

  169. 90% OS market does matter by cyclopsface · · Score: 1

    Does anyone else think that Vista may have a lot of "problems", at least at first, with iTunes support?

  170. 90% OS market share does matter by cyclopsface · · Score: 1

    Does anyone else think that Vista might have some "problems", at least at first, with iTunes support?

  171. Aren't iPods now at 640x420? by Tibor+the+Hun · · Score: 1

    Effectively doubling the resolution and quadrupling the number of pixels?
    (With video now coming at 1.5Mbps.)
    Or is that just what they output through the AV jack?

    --
    If you don't know what AltaVista is (was), get off my lawn.
    1. Re:Aren't iPods now at 640x420? by setirw · · Score: 1

      You are partially correct. iPods' embedded screen resolution is now VGA, not 640x420.

      --
      This message printed on 100% post-consumer recycled electrons.
    2. Re:Aren't iPods now at 640x420? by itwerx · · Score: 1

      I was actually much more interested in this bit:
      just like a miniature version of the Windows Media Center
      ...does that mean it comes with little miniature random reboots?
      What about cute little miniature file format compatibility problems?
      Ooh, wait, even better, can I get a miniature remote control that doesn't work with it?

  172. Re:*snicker* by backwardMechanic · · Score: 1

    Your roommate, huh?

  173. Umm, exsqueeze me? Baking powder? by Cerebus · · Score: 1
    Microsoft will make the movement of media between Windows, Soapbox and the Zune natural and seamless.

    When has Microsoft ever made anything seamless?

    --
    -- Cerebus
  174. well... what's a radio for? by johnpaul191 · · Score: 1

    honestly.... if the iPod (or some future iPod killer) had AM and/or FM radio in it i would think a good chunk of the motivation would be live info you could not have synced at home. something like weather updates, or sporting events (scores?). really most all of that is available on cell phones now.

    personally i listen to the radio a lot, but it's a local non-commercial college station or NPR and that's it. i used to listen to an extinct local FM talk radio station, and since its demise i have not found any other talk station that can keep my interest. i suppose a part of me would like a radio tuner in my iPod, but not enough to buy a different device, or one of the after market FM tuner things (if they still exist?).

    other people made good points that, for example, many local commercial stations have less songs in rotation that you could fit on an iPod shuffle. with the internet, radio is not as important as it used to be for exposure to new top 40 hits. a lot of the reason i listen to college radio is to learn about music i didn't know existed.... not to just hear my favorite songs that i already own. i know i am a minority in that one though.

  175. FUD by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

    Think of it as a portable, wireless, hardware version of MySpace. With the Zune, Microsoft is trying to launch a consumer media 'perfect storm.'

    I love the smell of fresh FUD in the morning.

    --
    You just got troll'd!
  176. neither? by johnpaul191 · · Score: 1

    if Apple was really scared... wouldn't they do something to protect their iPod's popularity? wouldn't that be even worse for MS? right now MS has matched the 30 gig iPod price. i would bet their pricing has more to do with the price of the iPod than any other business and manufacturing formulas for profit margin. i am sure they hope to make money on the subscription service too.

    to fight back..... Apple could just make their 30 gig a 40 gig for the same price and that would hurt MS (right?). they made the 60GB an 80GB AND lowered the price by $50. so, the new large iPod is 80 Gigs. a few weeks ago they offered 30 and 60 gig models. one can guess the 60 has twice the platter of the 30, so there may be the half-sized drive of the 80 GB model around the corner. just a seemingly logical guess?

  177. 200 Million?? by markass530 · · Score: 1

    "the company expects to have 200 million Vista users within two years."

    a conservative expection I'm sure...

  178. Re:*snicker* by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

    You expect every person on the planet with a personal computer to buy a new one within the next 2 years?

    No, only about 400 millions, and yet that's a slightly conservative estimate.

    --
    You just got troll'd!
  179. Play 4 sure?!?!? by entropyfoe · · Score: 1

    The irony of this name will surely come to bite M$.
    When people find out it does not, the DRM gremlins will turn people against it.
    -Jay

  180. zune = wireless myspace by Treates2 · · Score: 0

    >>>The Zune isn't just a music player, the article argues. Think of it as a portable, wireless, hardware version of MySpace

    yuck!!.. where can i find a nearby toilet so i can barf up my intestines.

  181. Computerworld Writers are Tools by czfqnr · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Um, What is Apple Scared of? And how did this tool of a writer make that determination?
    I fail to see how someone can make a statement about a company's opinion without asking them.

    Perhaps someone should write a counter article about how M$ is scared that Apple
    spent time developing products that people wanted to buy and use.

    I think they might also be a little scared that Apple is selling a quad core workstation
    for less than their nearest competitor.

    Once again, the M$ and ComputerWorld relationship has shown it's true colors.

    I'm getting tired of reading articles from publications that have idiot writers
    that fell in love with Microsoft right out of college (or High School), and
    that their main advertising dollars are tied to products spawned from Microsoft.

    I think Computerworld should consider firing that writer for Marketing for
    a particular company, and providing a one sided biased opinion
    of how a company "feels".

    --
    Avg. Live Expectancy of a SysAdmin, 45 Years.
    1. Re:Computerworld Writers are Tools by mike_elgan · · Score: 1

      Hello. Tool of a writer here.

      My family of four owns six iPods. I personal own two. I love them, and doubt I will be switching to a Zune. That doesn't make Apple any less concerned about Zune.

      You seem to imply that my column was somehow critical of Apple or favorable toward Microsoft. If you can find a single critical comment in my column toward Apple, please post a quote in this forum.

      Actually, I gushed over iPod ("transcendent design"..."Apple's media players are so good they have transformed consumer electronics") and was lukewarm about the Zune ("pretty cool"... "Compared with Apple's latest iPod, the Zune is a slightly larger, slightly heavier, slightly less elegant device.")

      I don't mind criticizing either Apple or Microsoft. But that's not what this column was about.

      All the semi-nice things I said about the Zune boils down to this: It's cool enough, cheap enough, and featured enough to scare Apple. It's better than iPod fans expected and cannot be dismissed as a non-event. That's all I'm saying.

      I'm not saying Zune is better than iPod. I'm saying that it's good enough -- combined with the other reasons I listed -- to be a real concern to Apple.

      Let's say that for the holiday season, Apple sells three million iPods, and Microsoft sells a half-million Zunes. That's a disaster for Apple. That's a half-million iPods Apple didn't sell. Microsoft could lose a billion dollars on it. It's STILL a disaster for Apple.

      Mike Elgan

    2. Re:Computerworld Writers are Tools by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, you're a complete loser. The fact that you write for "Windows Magazine" proves this.

      Get a real job, like cleaning toilets.

  182. You forgot one... by Bemopolis · · Score: 1

    "There is no data...only Zune."

    Bemopolis

    --
    "I guess the moral of the story is, don't paint your airship with rocket fuel." -- Addison Bain
  183. "pwnt" by Superfarstucker · · Score: 1

    The damn thing isn't even out yet and it is already the headline of every other article at tech news aggregators. I'd say Microsoft has done a good job astroturfing thus far. But that doesn't have jack shit about the long term survivability of the product. My guess is that it will put the squeeze on the other competition and approach parity in the market with Apple. When the iPod came out nobody had a fucking clue it would be so succesful, even the apple zealots hated it (zomg its not a iNewton). Give it six months.

    Technically, it appears to be a functional and solid player and seems to be equivalent to an apple player in most respects and even includes some cool new features. Of course, I "have never seen a checkbox I didn't love." I'd consider buying one when my current DAP reaches the end of its useful lifespan.

  184. No Fear by kahrytan · · Score: 1


    Apple doesn't fear inferior products from an inferior corporation. Besides, Zune is easy to beat. Nokia 770 (or similar device) + Ipod = Zune Killer. And I don't mean by putting iTunes on Nokia 770. I mean a converging of technology to build a new device. So, Apple isn't sared. They can do better then Zune. The question is when.

    --
    \
    1. Re:No Fear by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1
      Apple doesn't fear inferior products from an inferior corporation.
      Wow... I think you've been a bit too long in that reality distortion field.
      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
    2. Re:No Fear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      You think Windows is superior to OSX?

    3. Re:No Fear by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1
      You think Windows is superior to OSX?
      Sorry -- this feels too much like a flamebait. You don't even ask why and you're posting from AC.
      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
  185. Bad interface by Skynyrd · · Score: 1

    The Zune interface is just like a miniature version of the Windows Media Center user interface

    That will keep my money in Apple's pocket.

    And I don't want wireless. I don't want FM. I don't want games.

    I want to play mp3 files. That's it.

    1. Re:Bad interface by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1
      That will keep my money in Apple's pocket.

      And I don't want wireless. I don't want FM. I don't want games.

      I want to play mp3 files. That's it.
      ... Then why do you want a iPod if all you want is the ability to play Mp3s?

      There are plenty of devices suited to JUST playing mp3s.
      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
    2. Re:Bad interface by Skynyrd · · Score: 1

      ... Then why do you want a iPod if all you want is the ability to play Mp3s?

      There are plenty of devices suited to JUST playing mp3s.


      Because I haven't found an mp3 player with a good interface from a reliable company. I also use iTunes for my music - after trying and uninstalling just abouit everything out there.

    3. Re:Bad interface by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1
      Because I haven't found an mp3 player with a good interface from a reliable company.
      So, suddenly your requirements aren't just playing mp3s, it's additionally a 'good interface'.

      Of course what people define as a good interface is different. My requirements for a portable music player, are just something I can hit 'play, stop, pause, rewind, fast forward, skip to next song, skip to last song' as buttons. The end, nothing I need beyond that. I imagine yours are probably beyond that though?

      I also use iTunes for my music - after trying and uninstalling just abouit everything out there.
      I found iTunes quite annoying, as it didn't support a lot of music formats (MOD, IT, NSF ?), no lyric support, no automatic downloading and displaying of album information. There even seemed to be lack of the ability to synchronise to different devices (like iRiver, minidisc, simple usb-mp3 players -- I let aqaitences sync my mod music library if they wish).

      Any how, this is why I use Amarok (which supports all of the above and more). The only disadvantage with Amarok is that you can't play Apple DRM on it -- But then again, that doesn't concern me, since I will do everything in my power not to buy DRM media.
      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
    4. Re:Bad interface by Skynyrd · · Score: 1

      So, suddenly your requirements aren't just playing mp3s, it's additionally a 'good interface'.

      Not suddenly at all. I started the thread with the title of "Bad interface" and commented that I wouldn't buy it because it was similar to WMPlayer.

      Of course what people define as a good interface is different. My requirements for a portable music player, are just something I can hit 'play, stop, pause, rewind, fast forward, skip to next song, skip to last song' as buttons. The end, nothing I need beyond that. I imagine yours are probably beyond that though?

      Absolutely. Interface choice is similar to Ford vs Chevy or Coke vs Pepsi. I've used iPods, and I really like the interface. It's simple, but powerful enough to scroll through a huge library quickly. I considered a Shuffle because it fit my needs (and I work as a fabricator in a special effects shop and things get destroyed in a hurry) but they weren't shipping. I ended up with a Nano.

      I found iTunes quite annoying, as it didn't support a lot of music formats (MOD, IT, NSF ?), no lyric support, no automatic downloading and displaying of album information. There even seemed to be lack of the ability to synchronise to different devices (like iRiver, minidisc, simple usb-mp3 players -- I let aqaitences sync my mod music library if they wish).

      Any how, this is why I use Amarok (which supports all of the above and more). The only disadvantage with Amarok is that you can't play Apple DRM on it -- But then again, that doesn't concern me, since I will do everything in my power not to buy DRM media.

      I only have MP3s, as the CD player in my truck plays CDs, MP3s and (I think) Windows Media Files. I don't bother with the other formats (including AAC).

      I'm tied to Windows because of an application I need to run, and I feel iTunes is better than all else I've tried. But it's the Coke/Pepsi thing again...

  186. what's the big deal? by oohshiny · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In a year or two, many players will have some form of wireless: Bluetooth, WiFi, and/or wireless USB. Apple will probably include something like it in an upcoming iPod and it will be slightly less crippled, and people will ooh and aah about how "open" Apple is. And then you'll see a huge number of cheap MP3 players with wireless that really do come without all those annoying restrictions, and those will be the good ones to get.

  187. Marketshare by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Microsoft owns more than 90% of the worldwide operating systems market (compared with Apple's roughly 5%), representing some 300 million people. The company expects to have 200 million Vista users within two years.

    In relevant news, Microsoft owns more than 99.99% of the worldwide computer virus market (compared with Apple's roughly 0%), representing some 4 million viruses. The company expects to have 3 million Vista viruses within two years.
  188. Re:Still no way. M$ unable to push Zune or Vista. by Keith+Russell · · Score: 0

    Was there anything really different or insightful in any of that, or are you trying to set a new record for "Number of words wasted to say 'Windoze is teh suXX0r!!11'"? Same shit, different CID.

    --
    This sig intentionally left blank.
  189. Radio wave is light by aepervius · · Score: 1

    When you hear radio you are already hearing light, albeit a very low energy light (long wave length). And we can already "see" all the highier energy wave like IR, Visible, uv, x ray : just use a spectrometer and instead of having a visible spectra transform it in corresponding vibration. Et Voila ! You hear light. Alternatively for visible light you could use you eyeball to just plain see light...

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
  190. Flattered by the exclusive attention of a troll. by twitter · · Score: 1
    Troll Kieth Russel asks:

    Was there anything really different or insightful in any of that,

    Well, yes, I made a well cited argument that 200,000,000 Vista users in two years is bullshit. It was based, mostly, on XP uptake and current usage.

    or are you trying to set a new record for "Number of words wasted to say 'Windoze is teh suXX0r!!11'"? Same shit, different CID.

    No, it's easy to say every version of Windows has sucked. Above I say that users have noticed that no "upgrade" has ever made things much better and that bodes poorly of Vista sales. It's part of my overall argument against insane Vista sales predictions.

    As for the same shit different CID, I'm afraid I've only heard one tune from you Kieth. Of the 24 posts currently on display on your user page, 10 are devoted to M$ defense and trolling Twitter directly. One or two of the others are crap fillers in the same treads, which basically say nothing.

    1. his worst-case-scenario form of "advocacy" is a blight on this forum
    2. "There is nothing in the linked article that suggests that DRM has anything to do with the findings.", on people's continued avoidance of DRM music
    3. Defending iTunes telling Apple what you listen too
    4. Claiming iTunes does not tell Apple what you listen too, in same thread as defense of same!
    5. Claiming everone destroyed by M$ actually destroyed themselves.
    6. I'm not sure what you are saying here, other than don't worry about Paladium and other DRM attacks, M$ can't get away with it wishful thinking.
    7. More bullshit., "You can keep thumping your copy of The Cathedral and The Bazzar as if it were a Bible all you like."
    8. "That's the sanctimonious tone you've taken in every hate-filled anti-Microsoft post you've ever made"
    9. "twit in a nutshell. A sad, sorry, little ball of hatred and paranoia."
    10. More M$ Love.

    Such individual attention is flattering, but Kieth Russel, you are a Microsoft loving troll.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  191. ipod owner no more!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    fisrt of all apple said its self that it owns 72-74% market share so get your facts right also i own an ipod mini but i never felt like buying the ipod video plus ever since but Zune with its big screen seems like it might be worth watching movies on, also apple ever since its 2-3 generation ipods have not added a single feature ok sure they added video playback and pictures but these features are now industry standard. Now in a time when every mp3 player has more features then ipod it just feels stupid to buy another ipod, yet all apple wants to do is make its ipod smaller soon they will be invisible but features will be the same. Where as zune will give a lot more features i.e bigger screen, fm tuner, music sahring and you gussed it for the same price. so i think its time for the apple cult to take off their blind folds and start looking at things from a objective point of view. Finally apple has lost its cool since when u go in a bus or train or gym or anyother place and see every one using ipod you fell like using something else. Too much or nothing is good.

    1. Re:ipod owner no more!!! by DDLKermit007 · · Score: 1

      Sounds like your too concious about other people than yourself to be worried about what others are using to listen to music on the bus. I'm personaly game for Apple however making thier stuff smaller while doing incramental upgrades. Reason everyone jumps on something like video playback is because Apple ends up making it a standard item. When you own over 50% of the market whatever you do IS the standard. Until then it's not. Yes others do things often before Apple (Archos), but thier players were far too big for mass acceptance, had bad battery life, or other short-comings and as such the technology just wasn't ready. Remeber this about the Zune when it comes out. Hows it's battery life, hows it handle those Play for Sure files that don't work, it's interface, how big is it, etc.

  192. Re:Flattered by the exclusive attention of a troll by dedazo · · Score: 1
    And yet interestingly, by simply looking at your current posting history you're the one who is modded overrated, troll and flamebait - mods that KeithRussel does not have. How can that be, twitter? Oh, I forget - it's probably because of the "vast M$ conspiracy" that targets you by using Slashdot mod points, right? And the point of this "conspiracy" is to "astroturf" Slashdot and promote "M$ winblows". Correct?

    For example, is the "conspiracy" responsible for the moderation on fantastic post of yours? Or did you just sort of forget that anyone can look at your posting history?

    --
    Web2.0: I love when people Flickr my cuil and digg my boingboing until my google is reddit and I start to yahoo
  193. marketshare by moria · · Score: 1
    Microsoft owns more than 90% of the worldwide operating systems market (compared with Apple's roughly 5%), representing some 300 million people. The company expects to have 200 million Vista users within two years.
    In relevant news, Microsoft owns more than 99.999% of the worldwide computer virus market (compared with Apple's exactly 0%), representing some 4 million computer viruses. The company expects to have 3 million Vista viruses within two years.
  194. Sure the DRM will get hacked by Infonaut · · Score: 1

    I'm sure a mod will be made in no time which would allow copying of files between Zunes without DRM.

    Doubtless a hack will quickly appear. However, nobody will use the hack unless they're already using the Zune and are excited about the sharing capability. With the DRM as an initial barrier, that's just one more reason not to even buy a Zune in the first place. Ostensibly the song sharing is the killer feature.

    But it's born with a built-in ambiguity. Will I be able to share songs without limitations using some hack? Will MS plug the hack? Will I have to keep screwing around with my Zune to make this song-sharing thing work? Geeks may enjoy modding their Zunes, but regular consumers won't.

    --
    Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ
  195. Legacy killed the Bill Gates star by theolein · · Score: 1

    Microsoft's biggest problem in the mp3 space is very similar to their biggest problems in the gaming space, portable telephone space and other spaces where they haven't had a monopoly for 15 years: Legacy, baby.

    I personally have nothing against Microsoft products. Indeed, I use Windows all day at work and am fairly happy with it. I really hate Microsoft's business practices, though.

    But Microsoft suffers from the fact that people who have invested heavily in other products will not be likely to change to an unknown, start from scratch device that offers me no benefits above my iPod. I have spent some $300 on the iTunes Store and even though MS says I can get that all from Microsoft (I'm still waiting for the smallprint on that one - Does Microsoft allow me to burn the stuff to CD or keep it for even if I decide Micorosoft are a bunch of lying fuckers and stop paying?)

    Make no m istake, Microsoft will throw money and time at this until it does get a marketshare, much like they did with PDAs (which are now more or less irrelevant), mobile phones (people don't want a fucking start button on their phones you dumb bastards), or game consoles (Say thanks to Sony for fucking up, it certainly wasn't due to your talent you useless bunch of shits)

  196. My ad hominem POV... by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

    ..."Apple is scared" which he sets out as truth when he has absolutely no proof.

    The clue is right at the bottom of the page.

    "Mike Elgan is a technology writer and former editor of Windows Magazine."

    No bias here. He probably has the sort of mindset that can't even conceive living outside the sort of headspace that Microsoft has so carefully constructed to build its monopoly.

  197. Re:I don't think you understand the functionality. by jbloggs · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Nobody seems to get it. The reason why Apple hasn't done wireless in the past is because it sucks up too much battery. I know this from speaking with one of the guys in the small core iPod team: they have an ultimate constraint for any feature that uses too much juice. If it reduces hours, it won't get implemented. Period. Wait until there's more battery friendly wireless, then see what Apple does.

  198. Don't forget. . . by NetRAVEN5000 · · Score: 1
    Don't forget the craptastic sound you have to make to pronounce its name. . .

    Seriously. "Zune". . . someone at MS wasn't thinking when they it that.

    (Not that I'm surprised or anything, MS just has craptastic stuff I guess, like their bot that indexed my site 46 times in about half an hour yesterday. Good thing it's running Linux.)

  199. My feedback to the author... by eckenheimer · · Score: 1

    Thank You! I haven't had such a good laugh in a long time. I wonder how many of your readers missed the irony in the article and thought you were actually saying the Zune would succeed because they keep invoking that lame MySpace everyone is getting bored with. Your glowing description of the Zune's "bigger screen" was great, too. You could also have pointed out that though Zune and iPod both have 320x240 pixels, that Zune's bigger (and cheaper) pixels make theirs fuzzier, with less of that annoying image sharpness. And of course your comment that Zune's 4x3 screen (when sideways) is much better for widescreen movies than iPod's 3x4 screen was hilarious. Your restraint in not trying for easy laughs about the Zune's color scheme and nonfunctional nav wheel is admirable; it would have been a cheap shot. And the way you were able to actually write "the Microsoft consumer media juggernaut" without mentioning Bob or the many other Microsoft media successes is a masterpiece of subtlety. Anyway, my congratulations. I can't wait to read what you have to say about [hasta la] Vista.

    --
    "When you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to reform." - Mark Twain
  200. Why it'll be different. . . by NetRAVEN5000 · · Score: 1
    "What will ZUNE do that the Pocket PC / Windows Mobile platform cannot do?"

    Ah but have you ever seen a shit brown Pocket PC? I think not!

  201. Xbox integration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apart from building a music store into Xbox Live Marketplace that I wouldn't use I don't know what integration they could offer that is better than what allready exists for my iPod. Without any updates I just plug my iPod full of standard MP3s into my 360 and I can use the xbox menu to play any music with visualisations it's pretty cool. I can just have my iPod plugged in all the time and use the Xbox IR remote to browse my whole music collection. I prefer leaving the game's music on, but you can replace this with music from you iPOd if you want. I guess the Zune could do all this wirelessly but what's the point? It would just eat the batteries and the xbox is just sitting there.

  202. Dumb link choice. by SeaFox · · Score: 1
    I disagree. I think the Mac version is easier.

    I'm not seeing how that Wired blog supports your statement. It makes no statements whatsoever comparing the Windows to OSX version in terms of ease of use by design. All it notes is that iTunes 7 has issues, and iTunes 6.0.5 is the most popular download on Apple's site right now. Not only that, the post's conclusions are presumptuous and illogical.

    From that article:
    Considering that Apple's iTunes page encourages vistors to download version 7 of the media player, the stats on the support page suggest that many Windows users are uninstalling iTunes 7 and going back to version 6.0.5.


    The download stats say that iTunes 6.0.5 is the most popular download, they don't differentiate between the Mac and PC versions, so there is nothing to prove that the high popularity of version 6.0.5 is attributable to Mac users or PC users, just iTunes users.

    Also, the timeframe the downloads are counted in is not listed. iTunes 6.0.5 was available for how many months before iTunes 7? Everybody on the planet is not going to upgrade in the first 24 hrs (I haven't). Unless you want to buy video content or want gapless music playback, there is little reason to download this upgrade. Add ot that people who are avoiding this version because they don't like the interface changes and people whe always wait for the .0.1 release so they can avoid the "new version" bugs.

    iTunes 6.0.5 has had a little more time to rack up download stats and will not be unseated until at least that many copies of version 7 are downloaded.
    1. Re:Dumb link choice. by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1
      I'm not seeing how that Wired blog supports your statement. It makes no statements whatsoever comparing the Windows to OSX version in terms of ease of use by design.
      No, but it did actually say there are more problems with the windows version. Which by the way, in turn can also be interpreted as more problematic. More problematic = software becomes less easy.

      I'm sure you understand my logical reasoning here.

      All it notes is that iTunes 7 has issues, and iTunes 6.0.5 is the most popular download on Apple's site right now.
      Apple's iTunes website has iTunes 7 for download on the front page now. Which still has problems (I know, because I'm being asked constantly now by people to support their DRM non-sense -- Whereas before, I was never, ever bothered about iTunes).

      Also, the timeframe the downloads are counted in is not listed. iTunes 6.0.5 was available for how many months before iTunes 7?
      True, and I agree with you there.

      Everybody on the planet is not going to upgrade in the first 24 hrs (I haven't). Unless you want to buy video content or want gapless music playback, there is little reason to download this upgrade.
      My experience (after having checked every documented possibility on Apple's site),

      "Yes, but you can't play your DRM music obviously on iTunes 7 for some reason, so if you want to play them, you will need to downgrade to six."
      "But I like iTunes7."


      I don't know how you can claim it's just as easy on windows -- When on iTunes 7 for Windows, things just don't work.
      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
  203. Headphone wire by Ahnteis · · Score: 1

    Frequently, they'll also use the headphone wire. At least, that's the way I remember things. :) It's been a while since I cared enough about radio to be sure.

  204. Re: "Zune" (someone come up with a funny wordplay) by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 1


    Press Release: Dino De Laurentiis and Microsoft present Zune ... the return to Arrakis!

    The movie continues the dry multimedia experience that fans of the original 1984 movie came to appreciate. Spice production has resumed when another previously unknown world has been ArrakaFormed to allow reintroduction of the Wurms necessary to the process.

    Tagline:
    It is by Zune Alone I set MS in Motion
    It is by the DRM that Lawsuits acquire speed, Music acquires Stain, the Stain becomes a warning.
    It is by Zune Alone I set MS in Motion

    The Slashdot Preview word for this post is bastard.

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  205. If the Zune environment... by walter_f · · Score: 1

    ... were in any way connected to the "Plays for sure"/"Urge" things (or any other earlier MS effort in the music/movie/content field);
    (and)
    if the Zune Player had some noticeable hardware advantages over the roughly comparable iPod models;
    (and)
    if it weren't Windows users who are probably 90% of the iTunes/iPod users and have been for years now;
    (and)
    if any of the MS content formats (like WMA, WMA plus, "WMA super DRM", whatever they are pleased to call it) had been established in the market in any significant degree;
    well, then - and only then - the Zune gadget would represent a strong threat to the iPod gadget.

    As long as not a single one of the above conditions being clearly in a "true" state, the Zune will just be a good way for MS to sink some big heaps of money they cannot invest anywhere outside their Windows/Office core business returning a raw profit margin of 80%.

  206. Seamless. Um. Yeah. This is Microsoft, right? by thirdwaver · · Score: 1
    Microsoft will make the movement of media between Windows, Soapbox and the Zune natural and seamless.
    I've been in this industry for over a decade and a half. I've never seen Microsoft do anything seamless. Ever. The only thing Microsoft does seamlessly is make one bad knockoff after another. If I hear Bill Gates whine about not being allowed to innovate one more time I'm going to puke straight up. Go ahead Bill! Innovate! Produce something original with the billions of dollars you spend in R&D each year.

    The Zune interface is just like a miniature version of the Windows Media Center user interface and is very similar to some elements of Vista.
    So it will be cluttered with badly made skins and won't allow me to smoothly fast search through my media? I can't WAIT!

    There is a market for this device. People who hate Apple's smugness and are willing to use sub-standard devices made by anyone else. I know two Apple haters. One has a Creative and the other is salivating for the Zune. Maybe they'll both run into each other one day and can share a song or two.
  207. Most likely another failed M$ product. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft has a long history of creating over-hyped versions of already existing products and then realizing there is no money in it or people do not want their poorly designed product.

    My first example is what I believe was Microsoft's first attempt at moving into the media content market. Some may remember the Microsoft Ultimate TV DVR which was actually a really nice product which they stopped developing or supporting about the same time as it hit the market. Now all that is left is the rather annoying and horribly bad Comcast DVR that runs Microsoft's guide which was reused from the Ultimate TV minus the stability, cool features, speed, and functionality.

    Then MS decided they wanted to try it again in the same market and introduced Windows Media Center Edition. Windows MCE was and still is a poorly conceived product. It doesn't support native use with any Cable or Satellite provider or have the ability to use cable card. It's interface is piss-poor and missing many simple features built into any mainstream DVR at a fraction of the cost. The only advantage it has over any other DVR on the market is it's ability to work as a regular PC connected to your TV. Has anyone really used one of these to surf the net or write a letter. MCE since it's much touted launch has been withdrawn to another failed MS product.

    Question: After all this work is there an MS DVR product on the market thats worth anything? NO. Why didn't they take what they learned and roll it into the Xbox 360 and capture some of the DVR market along with the game console market? The hardware is more than adequate and they have all of the software developed already.

    Answer: Microsoft is too large and lacks any clear direction. They lack cohesive interaction between development teams and are too busy trying to patch up and build on their existing virus ridden software foundation. Microsoft's software products have grown into what can only be compared to a skyscraper made of playing cards and gum built on top of a moving car with two flat tires thats traveling downhill at 100mph towards a cliff with a drunk Paris Hilton at the steering wheel.

    This is only one example of Microsoft's full hearted attempts to move into markets where there is room for success and they fail. I'll bet they stop trying to produce updates to the Zune before Vista service pack 1 hits windows update. More than likely the developers and designers for the Zune are already standing in line at the Indian unemployment office.

    Before you know it someone will be on slashdot saying the iPod is dead because Microsoft is releasing a portable Xbox that plays music and videos and has some lame implementation of that the PSP and iPod doesn't have.

  208. Re:Nothing new here, mostly the old FUD and some i by chriss · · Score: 1
    "That might even make it a breach of license agreement for creative commons licensed music, because they demand that if you give a track to someone else, that person has to be able to pass it on, impossible with the Zune."
    Zune doesn't give tracks to anyone, what it gives is a limited preview. In order to give the track to someone, you have to use a different method. In any case, the burden is on the user.

    The "limited" in preview is exactly what the CC license forbids. You may add DRM to a track, but you may not pass that track on to anyone if it does not have the same rights/license as the track you received. A track someone got from another Zune via WiFi would have these restrictions, so it is not allowed to pass CC licensed songs (beside attribution licensed) from one Zune to another, unless the DRM is removed. Since the user initiates the transfer, it is always the burden of the user, who is the one who agreed to the license.

  209. Bill fires another turd into the water. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someone please get Bill something for his diarrhea. I'm really getting tired of him launching turds in public all the time. And while your getting bill some diapers could you please take the lighter away from the author of this article. Bill keeps insisting he light everything that comes out his ass.

  210. Zune equals to NO tune by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    there you go.

  211. Re:Flattered by the exclusive attention of a troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    More M$ Love.

    He was referring to YOUR troll post there - are you implying that by questioning your bullshit FUD-laden posts he's somehow "loving" Microsoft? WTF??

  212. Zune and Ipos are MP3 players, not AAC nor WMP by belcoop · · Score: 1

    In the real world, kids have already a MP3 player. They play MP3 songs, without Digital rights management, and this with whatever player, mostly using itunes to put it on the player.

    Welcome monopolist to a late and mature market. Without real file standard monopoly. Your player must be a heck of a lot better than the competition.

    I see them only win if they give 3 years warranty instead of 1 year like the others.

    --
    sam
  213. Er ... I'm no Apple zealot but... by LupusCanis · · Score: 1

    ... is it just me or are there very few points that actually makes any sense in the article - aside from the support from more movie and TV companies, I really see no valid points there at all. And, let's be honest here, who actually uses their mp3 player primarily for movies?

    The initial version will sport a 30GB hard drive, peer-to-peer Wi-Fi connectivity, a 3-in. screen (320-by-240-pixel QVGA viewable in either portrait or landscape mode), an FM tuner that will display song information from stations that broadcast a Radio Broadcast Data Standards (RBDS) signal and a built-in nonreplaceable lithium-ion rechargeable battery that will probably deliver about 12 hours of music or about 3.5 hours of video on a single charge. It won't last as long as the iPod, but it will charge faster.

    Looking at this, the Zune is superior to the cheapest iPod video (in that it's about the same price and has the Wifi, a bigger screen and FM radio) but has worse battery life. The FM tuner is nice, but not anything essential, ditto the bigger screen. What worries me is that this is the ONLY model (effectively giving Apple an advantage in the "I have more than 30GB of music" market) and the battery life. It's hardly a significant difference - taking the Zune to be competing with the 30GB iPod but ... why would faster recharges be a selling point for the average consumer? Maybe there'll be a few people who charge their mp3 players on the train or on a plane or whatever, but I'd imagine that most people just plug it in and charge it overnight.

    Zune will connect to an iTunes-like music store called the Zune Marketplace, which will offer millions of songs, according to Microsoft. Music will be available for 99 cents per song or via an "all-you-can-eat," $14.99-per-month subscription package called a "Zune Pass." Movies and TV shows will become available on the site sometime next year. Marketplace will work with the Microsoft Points program -- Xbox users can spend Points on Zune media and vice versa. Each song on Marketplace costs 79 points. (For instance, 100 points equals $1.25).

    Although the subscription method is an improvement from Apple's model, I don't really see Apple NOT enacting a similar scheme if it's a success. And I don't really see why linking to the XBOX will be a huge boon for the Zune - anyone able to get onto the Marketplace already has broadband of some description and I'd imagine that most people don't get broadband purely for the XBOX, and they probably have a PC anyway. Maybe it'd help it sell for people who have Macs but also have XBOXes but surely Mac-people would be more likely to use iTunes anyway?

    Zune will come preloaded with yet-undisclosed songs from DTS, EMI Music's Astralwerks Records and Virgin Records, Ninja Tune, Playlouderecordings, Quango Music Group, Sub Pop Records and V2/Artemis Records.

    Unless they're exclusive tracks or ultra-uber-rare tracks, I don't see why this makes a difference. I don't think that anyone would buy an mp3 player for preloaded songs.

    Best of all, Zunes will be able to connect to one another wirelessly, letting people share songs (as well as playlists and .jpg photos) with up to four other simultaneous Zune users within Wi-Fi range. Recipients of these shared songs will be able to play them three times for up to three days free, after which they'll have to pay to listen. Songs received wirelessly can't be shared.
    ... traditionally you just put on the song and give one of the headphones to the other person so they can listen. Or you huddle up so that you can see the picture on the screen. Is there any point to this feature?

    Zune software will import audio files in unprotected WMA, MP3, AAC formats; JPEG photos; and videos in WMV, MPEG-4, H.264 formats. Microsoft has hinted that it will support other media formats, but hasn't specified which ones. Zune will import songs from Apple's iTunes "as permitted by the online service f

  214. Another reason to laugh by peter+Payne · · Score: 0

    Haha, I saw this and thought, surely there must be a lot of content at Zune.com, right? Surely, there'll be lots of information, a way to preorder it maybe, just like Apple, since no company generates a ton of buzz without, y'know, trying to benefit from it in terms of sales. Um, THE PAGE IS UNDER CONSTRUCTION! Apparently Microsoft doesn't own Zune.com, which is a pretty pathetic situation in my book, up there Nissan now owning Nissan.com, because they let some guy in Michigan get the drop on them, then spend the last decade trying to threaten and sue him rather than NOT working it out, as any reasonable company should. (I have tried to work with the Nissan.com owner in the past, giving him the information he needs to contact President Goshn directly rather than dealing with the local Nissan USA lackeys, but he's not exactly a "problem-solution" oriented person, and neither is Nissan.)

    Sigh.

    --
    You've got a friend in Japan: http://www.jlist.com
  215. Zune's screen is 44% larger than iPod's by MojoStan · · Score: 1
    I'll point out that the screen isn't all that different. The iPod screen is 320x240, 4:3 aspect ratio, 2.5" diagonal. The Zune screen is is 320x240, 4:3 aspect ratio, 3" diagonal. That extra 1/2" diagonal isn't worth the praise you give it.

    That extra 0.5" diagonal translates to 44% more screen space (if my math is correct). The iPod's 2.5" 4:3 screen has an area of 3.0 square inches (1.5" x 2.0"). The Zune's 3.0" diagonal 4:3 screen has an area of 4.32 square inches (1.8" x 2.4"). I haven't visually compared the two screens, but I think 44% more screen space would be a significant improvement over an iPod screen that's too small.

    Also, the iPod's screen ranks very low in photo/video quality comparisons like this one: MP3 and Portable Video Player Picture Quality Shoot-Out

    I'm still not convinced that watching videos would be a good experience on a 3" screen, but I think photo viewing should be significantly better on the Zune than the iPod.

    --
    TO START
    PRESS ANY KEY

    Where's the 'ANY' key? I see Esk, Kitarl, and Pig-Up...

  216. sharing? by kehren77 · · Score: 1

    With the Zune, students will be free to share music, videos and photos right there in class. They'll be able to pass notes to one another.

    Does anyone else find this disturbing? I work in a school and first, the second one of these is seen in a classroom it will be confiscated until the end of the day and second, should be be encouraging kids today to screw around in school instead of studying? And how long is it before we see the /. article about parents complaining that other kids at school shared porn with their kids via the Zune?

    Think of it as a portable, wireless, hardware version of MySpace.

    Great that's just what we need. Am I the only one who doesn't care for MySpace? Is that really where web design is headed? Every site will be 1 page with as many animated gifs, pictures, comments, videos and a background that makes it inpossible to read any of the text?

    Microsoft will make the movement of media between Windows, Soapbox and the Zune natural and seamless.

    So? iTunes seems pretty seamless to me and I can run it on Windows or a Mac.

    I realize this is an opinion piece, but really did the writer base any of this on fact? Go ahead and call me a fanboy. I admit, I like my iPod. If I want a FM tuner, I can get one pretty cheap. If I want movies from all the major studios, I just have to wait. Just like the TV shows, movie studios will eventually sign on. My Opinion, is that the Zune won't be around next Christmas.

  217. Re:Nothing new here, mostly the old FUD and some i by moonbender · · Score: 1

    Oh okay. That's not a long u, though. ;) Sorry for being a pedant.

    --
    Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
  218. By Stephen King / David Cronenberg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The Dead Zune"

  219. Re:Nothing new here, mostly the old FUD and some i by dfghjk · · Score: 1

    "The "limited" in preview is exactly what the CC license forbids."

    Sure, but the question is whether it matters in a "preview". The purpose of the DRM is to assure that the shared tracks don't constitute "distribution". If that isn't the case then Zune has a far greater problem than the CC license. If it is the case, the Zune has no problem with any content including CC licensed stuff.

    Ultimately, the question will be whether a user has a right to limited sharing of copyrighted content without the consent of copyright holders. In Zune's case, it's not only the DRM that limits the sharing to 3 views or 3 days but also the device itself that limits the sharing to 4 other users at any given time. IANAL so I don't know where MS got these numbers from, but I do know that the CC license is not the concern for them; general violation of copyright is. If they can get around that then CC licensers will have no complaint. Frankly I think they have only the slightest complaint anyway, since after 3 days or less the content disappears along with any possible violation.

    "Since the user initiates the transfer, it is always the burden of the user, who is the one who agreed to the license."

    I believe that's right. I made that point only because people insist that Zune itself will be in violation of the CC license when I don't believe that would be the case. It ultimately doesn't matter because the feature is worthless if it can't be used.

  220. Persecution Complex or Guilty Conscience? by Keith+Russell · · Score: 1

    I was going to do a point-by-point rebuttal of that shitty misrepresentation of my posting history. But I realized it was all redundant. Everything comes back to this point.

    1. his worst-case-scenario form of "advocacy" is a blight on this forum

    TRUTH. I'm through trying to be nice, or polite, or rational in an attempt to counterbalance your insanity. There's a reason some AC continued to post excerpts from the Linux Advocacy HOWTO after I first replied to you with it: Because you have no fucking clue what it says, nor do you care. You don't care how much of an asshole you are, or how poorly you reflect on this forum, or how poorly you reflect on Linux, the operating system you worship.

    You hate Microsoft so much, you'll stoop to anything -- lies, slander, defamation -- to respond to any post that even slightly implies any form of sympathy for your devil.

    --
    This sig intentionally left blank.
  221. Easy does it. by Triviadave · · Score: 1

    As far as I can see, the biggest thing working against MS here is simplicity. The ipod is extremely simple to use, and load songs onto (for those people who are less tech-savvy than the average reader of slashdot), I can't see MS (or anyone else for that matter) being able to produce something as elegant and easy to use as Apple's wheel. Until they can market their mp3 player as being as easy to use as an ipod, I can't see anyone being a real competitor to Apple, even given the ipod's current "failings" (screen size etc).

  222. Complete Troll. by twitter · · Score: 1

    I was going to do a point-by-point rebuttal ... TRUTH. I'm through trying to be nice, or polite, or rational in an attempt to counterbalance your insanity.

    All you need to do is explain why half of your posting time is devoted to harassing Twitter, but you can't. You stalk high and low scoring posts, so random chance encounters are impossible. Kieth Russel is a stalker account, representing a good portion of someone's life, devoted to harassing Twitter.

    There is nothing truthful, nice, polite or rational in your posts. They are baseless, insulting, rude and intentionally stupid. Every attempt is made at misdirection and insult. It is only rational in it's deliberate attempt to disrupt honest conversation.

    Oh yeah, fuck you.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:Complete Troll. by jb.hl.com · · Score: 1

      Right, listen twitter, you have just hopped directly over the line from being a misguided if slightly malicious Linux zealot into being an ignorant, hypocritical and downright lying cunt.

      First off, stop referring to yourself in the third person. I don't know what it's supposed to achieve, it might be so that people who skim posts without reading who they're by think that you have lots of supporters. The fact you removed your sticks-out-like-a-sore-thumb sig recently gives a little credence to this. Either that or you've got multiple personality disorder, and I don't think you have MPD.

      Representing a good portion of someone's life?! If he only, as you falsely claim, posts when you do, then he's spent roughly the same portion of his life "stalking" you that you have posting your FUD, lies and baseless accusations in any article with even a fleeting reference to Microsoft (and even a few with none). But of course, if it's in support of the "cause" then I'm sure that FUD, lies and baseless accusations are fine by you.

      There's nothing truthful or rational in your posts either. Accusing people of being paid Microsoft astroturfers is bad enough, but then going out of your way to blame Microsoft for, among other things, fax machines not being popular is just the cherry on the cake. As for disrupting honest conversation, what about you reposting any comments that get modded down (and with your karma bonus, that means three independent people would be needed to mod you down to -1, and with Slashdot's moderation system being the way it is the moderators are likely to be very different from one day to the next) and, in general, posting long, stupid rants, backed up with nothing but a handful of Slashdot articles which themselves link to sites like LinuxWorld and peppered with phrases like "M$" and "Windoze" which even the most immature of script kiddies gave up on years ago.

      Before you go around slinging shit at other people, make sure you're thoroughly shit free yourself. And no, fuck you . You are the problem here. You are the one who takes a liking for an operating system to a near religious fanaticism, you are the one who will promote anything "free" even when it does not suit someone's needs, you are the one who posts idiotic conspiracy theories about people who call you out on the bullshit you spread daily. And when I reply to insult someone, twitter, at least I have the balls to log in to do it.

      --
      By summer it was all gone...now shesmovedon. --
    2. Re:Complete Troll. by Keith+Russell · · Score: 1
      There is nothing truthful, nice, polite or rational in your posts. They are baseless, insulting, rude and intentionally stupid. Every attempt is made at misdirection and insult. It is only rational in it's deliberate attempt to disrupt honest conversation.

      Hypocrisy of the first order.

      I'm through arguing with a 9-year-old. Get help. I'll pray for you.

      --
      This sig intentionally left blank.
  223. Re:Nothing new here, mostly the old FUD and some i by Nicolay77 · · Score: 1

    My friends Bah-lee and Da-nee will buy the Zoo-Nee :P

    --
    We are Turing O-Machines. The Oracle is out there.
  224. An even more dedicated troll. by twitter · · Score: 1

    Yes, jb.hl.com, you have already admitted to being a stalker. I'll catalog now how dedicated a stalker your account is. Of the 20 posts visible in your history an astounding 13 are dedicated to bashing Twitter. The rest are the usual "I hate Slashdot" troll talk. Do you have a life outside hating a single Slashdot user?

    1. Hates YouTube.
    2. Of course, the 30 minute waste of life above.
    3. Slashdot is stupid and sucks because it does not agree with jb. Why not go away jb? Because you are here to fuck with people, that's why.
    4. Plain bullshit to waste time.
    5. Pure hate.
    6. Advocating Windoze Media and general insults.
    7. Death threat, that's one I missed. Nice.
    8. More harassment.
    9. A post without insult, it's got to be 1/100.
    10. More abuse, back in character.
    11. More abuse.
    12. More abuse.
    13. Trying to figure out who Twitter is.

    It goes on and on. If you don't work for Microsoft, you waste a lot of time hating without compensation. How pathetic.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:An even more dedicated troll. by jb.hl.com · · Score: 1

      OK, I'll bite.

      Hates YouTube.

      I wasn't bashing you in the slightest in that post. And yes, I do hate YouTube, because it's a pile of shit. Nice technology, horrible contents.

      Slashdot is stupid and sucks because it does not agree with jb.

      It's called a joke. Jesus christ.

      Plain bullshit to waste time.

      Um...you suggested a Google search appliance, I pointed out a reason that one wouldn't be a good idea or suited to the BBC's needs. Where's the problem again?

      Pure hate. [Don't bother using reason and logic. He's laughing at you, dedazo. ;)]

      A joke. Again. With the person who I was replying to, dedazo, who hopefully got it.

      Advocating Windoze Media and general insults.

      No, I wasn't "advocating Windoze Media" (as if that's a crime), just pointing out that the BBC might want to partner with a company with a wide install base for its media player...or they might not. And the only "insult" (not "insults", there was only one thing in that post specifically directed at you) was "Fucking hell, you've reached a whole new low." in response to you calling Microsoft "the forces of evil" as well as your M$ bollocks.

      Death threat

      "Your life most likely does depend on it." That wasn't a death threat, nor would any normal person construe it as such in relation to your post. My point was that if you don't vote, your life may well be in threat because of various factors (war on terror etc). Clutched at any straws lately?

      More harassment.

      Yeah, that really was just saying that your post wasn't funny. Nothing else, really.

      A post without insult...1/100

      You only say that because I agreed with you.

      More abuse (x3)

      OK, let's get this straight. You repost a comment verbatim to get karma because your other one got modded down, I point that out; it's "abuse". You accuse me of being employed by Microsoft, even though I have said in a few past posts that I work in a chain store, and also accuse me of modding down your posts, even though that's completely impossible as I'd already posted. I point out that neither of those things are true, that's "abuse". What the fuck are you smoking?

      Trying to figure out who Twitter is.

      Um...right. So you're going to deny specifically that the site I linked to is yours are you? Because it fits damn well.

      If you don't work for Microsoft, you waste a lot of time hating without compensation. How pathetic.

      I could twist that around; you spend a lot of time bashing Microsoft without compensation, which has to be at least as pathetic, if not more so, especially since you appear completely without a rational thought in your head.

      --
      By summer it was all gone...now shesmovedon. --
    2. Re:An even more dedicated troll. by iced_773 · · Score: 1

      Wow. Two in a row. That shows true devotion. Please tell me again who's spending all their time stalking people?

      I'd link to a few fine moments in your posting history, but I don't have the time. So instead, I'll post links to some folks who already did:

      http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=137420&cid=114 89259
      http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=190598&cid=156 95254

      You probably will be going through my history now. Oh wait - you already have.

  225. Yes, Kieth Russell is through. by twitter · · Score: 1

    I'm through arguing

    I hope so, but I'm not that lucky. When I see more of your insults and bullshit, I'll just post the above. It looks like you need another account to fuck with Twitter and I'm sure you have a dozen of them. It's too bad you squandered such a low user id like that. It must have cost a lot of money, one way or another.

    But before you go, does someone pay you to spend half of your time harassing Twitter and the rest Slashdot in general, or are you just a fuck head with nothing better to do?

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:Yes, Kieth Russell is through. by jb.hl.com · · Score: 1

      Yes, Keith Russell has 293 accounts, all registered for the sole purpose of harassing you. I myself am just about everyone on Slashdot apart from Tripmaster Monkey, you and Keith's 293 accounts, and sublease these accounts to Microsoft so they can pay lots of Indian people to constantly debunk your rants. This doesn't appear in their annual report because they got the Illuminati to magic it away into Never Never Land, so nobody will know. I am extremely rich out of my deal with Microsoft (putting the $ in M$, so to speak) and live in a big mansion with my 1000-strong harem, my monkey butlers, personal brewery and Windows logo shaped swimming pool. Come visit some time, it's at 1 Jesusfuckingchristyoureamoron Lane, Bullshit City, FU.

      I know you're not very good at telling, I dunno, jokes from insults, so I'll just point out that the above was sarcastic.

      --
      By summer it was all gone...now shesmovedon. --
    2. Re:Yes, Kieth Russell is through. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      apart from Tripmaster Monkey

      Does that mean Doc Ruby == TMM?

    3. Re:Yes, Kieth Russell is through. by jb.hl.com · · Score: 1

      No. I'm fairly sure he's either me or one of Keith's 293 accounts. Can't be bothered to check.

      --
      By summer it was all gone...now shesmovedon. --
    4. Re:Yes, Kieth Russell is through. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then who's Whiney Mac Fanboy?

    5. Re:Yes, Kieth Russell is through. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not twitter, but twittest.

  226. Re:PR plant... Launch promo begins by mike_elgan · · Score: 1

    ***This is DEFINITELY a PR piece written by Microsoft PR group.***

    Here's why I wrote this piece: I have noticed my fellow iPod enthusiasts "pointing and laughing," as I put it, at Microsoft's entry into the media player market (on blogs, in articles and elsewhere), mocking Microsoft's futile attempt to enter into the media player ring with Apple. In stark contrast, I've also noticed that Apple is taking the Zune very seriously as a potential threat.

    One role of columnists is to seek out popular myths and misconceptions and provide insight and argument to dispel them. That's what I did in my article.

    One such myth is that the Zune's customization of colors and backgrounds, etc., is either irrelevant or bad (because people make bad decisions about colors, etc.). My very simple and obvious point was that real people in real life like to customize things. I used MySpace as an example of that fact.

    I'm not out to make "invisible connections" in people's minds. Jesus. I'm just making a point.

    - Mike Elgan

  227. So... by OfNoAccount · · Score: 1

    You're asking for a pune on Zune?
    *ba da boom*

  228. Re:Nothing new here, mostly the old FUD and some i by Com2Kid · · Score: 1

    Bleck, they teach in school "add an E on the end, makes the vowel long" (they don't specify WHICH vowel...) so I figured, "tune" has an e on the end, so that U sound must be the long one.

    I do not do phonics. Semantics is cool, but phonics are irritating!

  229. Poison by Keith+Russell · · Score: 1

    I am done with you because I did pray on this, and realized three things:

    1. I have said some very inconsiderate things to you in my most recent posts, and I apologize for them.
    2. It was foolish of me to think that I could do something about the hate that's in your heart. Just because man can do God's work on Earth doesn't mean he should endeavour to do so when it is not God's will.
    3. Romans 12:17-18. I realized that my actions have been contrary to this advice:
      Do not repay anyone evil for evil. Be careful to do what is right in the eyes of everybody. If it is possible, as far as it depends on you, live at peace with everyone.

    Go in peace.

    --
    This sig intentionally left blank.
  230. No, not really by dedazo · · Score: 1
    Your UID is in the 100K's and your first post was probably around early 2000. You've posted 5,769 times. Assuming a start date of 2001 and six years to date, that's just under three times a day you've shared your insulting "M$ is tah suxx" bullshit with generous loads of retarded conspiracy theories, FUD-laden claims, hilariously petulant demeanor and preschool-level spelling.

    Now, KeithRussel has a UID under 5K, and his first post was probably in early '99 or so. He's posted just over 1,000 comments. Assuming 7 years to date that's just under one post every four days, on average.

    If you're not too fucking cheap, splurge $5 bucks on the website that seems to be the center of your sad life to go through Keith's posting history. If your "theory" of that account having been purchased somehow is correct, that means that his posting pattern must have changed at some point. It doesn't. But you can figure that out for yourself if you're interested. So since his first reply to you appears just a few months ago, that means that someone was mental enough to "buy" this account and keep it dormant until 90 days ago just for the purpose of giving you a hard time. Is that what you're implying? OK then, prove it.

    Prove it. Or, go ahead and prove that something I pointed out above is wrong. I dare you. Maybe this time instead of just slithering away or using that infantile "I'm laughing at you" smegma you'll develop some balls? It's already bad enough that you refer to yourself in the third person. What the hell is wrong with you? You must be a Microsoft-sponsored troll in Indonesia designed specifically to make the free software community look stupid. There's no other possible explanation. There's no way in hell that a person so utterly screwed up exists anywhere except in the mind of some evil PR astroturfer expert.

    And finally, to your "whenever I see more of your insults and bullshit" point, how about I post this every time I see your "insults and bullshit", eh? Oh, wait. Someone already does, every time. Funny how that works. But hey, I can always help if needed.

    --
    Web2.0: I love when people Flickr my cuil and digg my boingboing until my google is reddit and I start to yahoo
  231. In case anyone was wondering... by ben_rh · · Score: 1

    I don't know if that was sarcasm or not, but in case anyone's wondering, that was a (imo pretty funny) reference to the Paul Simon track Diamonds on the Soles of her Shoes, from his '86 release Graceland.

    Good album too.

  232. Breaking news! What's a 'slashdot'? by aqk · · Score: 1

    Breaking news!
      Thosands of slashdot users eschew the MS Zunes! Microsoft is
    terrified, as iPod sales continue to creep up by the hundreds.
    The haughty /.ers are even sneering at 'Myspace'

    Meanwhile, millions of teenyboppers, teenagers and twentysumpins
    are busy logging into Myspace, including my three kids and
    ALL their friends.

        And, when queried, they ask "Huh? Whats a slashdot?"m as they busy
    themselves trying to figure how to integrate their new Zunes
    with Myspace.

        As well, millions of them are also asking "Whats an 'eschew'?"...

  233. Re:Bad interface - A common problem for MSFT by aristotle-dude · · Score: 1
    Yeah. Unfortunately, this seems to be a common mistake with MSFT. They have been trying to shoehorn the windows start menu into Tablets, PDAs and PDA-sized devices for years.

    They don't get that smaller devices need to have intuitive UIs specifically designed for the medium or you end up with user frustration from poor usability.

    --
    Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
  234. What makes MS different? by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    XBOX.

    MS powered PDAs.

    That is what.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  235. Re:*snicker* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    PC sales are expected to decline through 2007. On the other hand, Mac sales are predicted to increase

    But macs ARE PCs. Look up PC in the dictionary!

  236. The twitter experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Ah, willy. So many friends. So much material. You're doing great!

    For those of you who wonder just who little twitter here is, a synopsis:

    This is the original confirmation of his real identity. We've had that suspicion for quite a while but there was no way to prove it for sure. He reacted predictably enough instead of just ignoring the post.

    Here is further confirmation. And this. As you can see, this guy is just insanely retarded - all he had to do do was just ignore the posts and we still wouldn't know for sure. He didn't reply to this, but by that time it wasn't necessary. Someone (not us) then posted this as well. We think that was the same person who registered this account, but we're not sure. He also has another lame home page. And this is his Cox page.

    As for his sockpuppet account, here's some dialectic proof (you can see the 'twitter' oozing out of there well enough), along with mention of "nuclear power", a topic which he claims to know about but is just generally ignorant about (as with everything else). Here's one where he mentions the BRLUG. A message was posted to the BRLUG (see "Willy evangelizes" thread here) for further confirmation, which he graciously provided.

    For those of who are new to the twitter experience, here's a thread that distills the interaction between KeithRussel and twitter: http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=195829&cid=160 48784. Wow.

    And finally, some great twitter material:

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=88413&cid=7656 803
    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=77588&cid=6896 690
    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=73226&cid=6595 921
    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=71864&cid=6492 229
    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=69025&cid=6312 196
    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=49657&cid=5011 656
    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=180946&thresho ld=1&cid=14972959
    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=129735&thresho ld=5&cid=10823036
    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=112229&cid=952 1025&threshold=5
    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=137420&cid=11

  237. Re:Nothing new here, mostly the old FUD and some i by moonbender · · Score: 1

    Hey, I looked it up and have to apologise - tune actually can be pronounced tu:n (or "toon"), rhyming with rune. The pronounciation I'm familiar with it is tjun (or "tyoon"), which is the British variant. What's worse is that the u is considered long in both cases, although it doesn't seem very long to me in the British case. I like phonetics incidently, but it's quite hard to get it right, transcribing stuff into the phonetic alphabet is notoriously difficult.

    --
    Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
  238. This is more evil empire slavishness by bandmassa · · Score: 1

    Remember people, Zune's wireless DRM wrapper wraps everything, including CC and free licences, a clear breach of these licences. I for one know that if I find one of my songs has been zuned, I'll be going microsoft for huge damages and theft.

    --
    "I hope you like Guinness, Sir. I find it a refreshing substitute for, er... food." Col. Jack O'Neil, SG-1
  239. Re:I'm new to the internets by orasio · · Score: 1

    It's a skanky woman feeding a guy with a moustache with droppings from her rear end.
    In that times, you could watch images download, or just while they were slowly loading to memory, and the gross part was in the last lines of the picture. Tell me about surprises.

  240. 200 Million Vista Users in 2 years, No Way. by twitter · · Score: 1

    Some silly troll pointed out:

    Theres about 200 million computers sold each year nowadays

    As if that would make any difference. How many years did it take XP to cross the 50% line? Five years on it's barely crossed 80% of the Windoze market share. IDC estimates there are only 400,000,000 XP users today. [wikipedia.org] Each new version of Windoze has taken longer to penetrate because each has been that much more outrageously bloated than it's predecessor. If nothing else has changed, it will be shocking to see so many Vista users in two years.

    Changes make their target even less likely. M$'s established users have had enough of the upgrade train. 95 to 98 was bad, 98 to XP was worse and XP to Vista is freaking impossible. You can only fool people so many times and they have plenty of options now. Free alternatives are not only good enough, they are better in many ways. Even if you don't want to go free, you can go Mac and not spend as much as Vista will require. Worse for M$, a large portion of the new computer market is going to come from Europe and the developing world and free software enjoys tremendous advantages there. M$'s language support can't hold a candle to free software even where people have the money to be owned by a US company. Where people don't really have money to waste on basic operating software, free software rules. M$'s growth potential is strictly limited and their user base will collapse soon after Vista flops. The monopoly is based on lies which will vanish in two years.

    It's all downhill for M$ now. Most people realize the M$ monopoly is in trouble. It's supposed strength is not going to sell Zune, which will be yet another failure of theirs to own the entertainment market. That failure is another punch to the M$ monopoly myth. It can't happen soon enough.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  241. wordplaying zune by djcomidi · · Score: 1

    zune is pronounced exactly the same as the dutch word for 'kiss'
    but m$ doesn't seem to understand the KISS-principle, the ipod does

    M$ tactics say:
    Embrace, Extend, Extinguish
    but it seems they made it:
    Embrace, Zune, Extend, Extinguish

    you may start laughing now...

  242. ATTENTION MODS by jb.hl.com · · Score: 1

    Twitter was modded down to -1 Troll for more or less exactly the same post (he changed "So what?" to "As if that would make any difference" here). He has reposted it, as he has done before, in an attempt to recover some karma.

    --
    By summer it was all gone...now shesmovedon. --
    1. Re:ATTENTION MODS by twitter · · Score: 1
      jb.hl.com is one of many accounts dedicated to harassing twitter. They must have run out of mod points to be crying like this.

      --

      Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    2. Re:ATTENTION MODS by dedazo · · Score: 1
      Nowhere in your attempt to compare an account with 1,200+ comments that has existed for more than three years with two accounts that have a grand total of 8 posts between them did I see an explanation for your posting of the same comment twice in a row.

      Would you like to try again, or are you just going to go on pretending that you're being unfairly targeted by a vast conspiracy of "Windoze" zombie botnets with mod points? I mean, instead of jut accepting that if you're being modded down as troll then you probably are doing something wrong.

      Maybe - and this is just a theory - your pointless "M$ Winblowze is teh lolololol suxxorz x100000000000!!!1!!!" prose is simply not welcome here anymore. I'll let you munch on that for a while.

      --
      Web2.0: I love when people Flickr my cuil and digg my boingboing until my google is reddit and I start to yahoo
    3. Re:ATTENTION MODS by jb.hl.com · · Score: 1

      I have nothing else to add to this. I'll come clean, tvvitter was me, the rest weren't. Of course, you'll never hear about twitter's sock puppet.

      --
      By summer it was all gone...now shesmovedon. --
  243. Again?? by dedazo · · Score: 1

    Why are you posting the same thing again? Because you were modded down to -1 as troll?

    --
    Web2.0: I love when people Flickr my cuil and digg my boingboing until my google is reddit and I start to yahoo
    1. Re:Again?? by jb.hl.com · · Score: 1

      He does it all the time...he writes a long post, posts it, it gets modded down, so he posts it again (using his karma bonus, so people will be able to see it).

      I think the funniest bit is he seems to think nobody will notice. Hint, twitter; if there are enough people reading your posts to merit the amount of derision you heap upon them, they'll notice a dupe right off the bat.

      --
      By summer it was all gone...now shesmovedon. --
  244. Re:I don't think you understand the functionality. by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

    Yeah, but what would they do then? If they let people wirelessly share songs without the annoying DRM restrictions the Zune has, wouldn't the music companies stop working with them on iTMS?

    I think wireless music sharing will only work with no-name Korean MP3 players made by companies who don't care about the music industry getting upset at them.