Slashdot Mirror


Fantasy Author Robert Jordan Passes Away

willith writes "James Oliver Rigney Jr, author of the long-running fantasy series The Wheel of Time and better known to millions of fans by the pen name Robert Jordan, died on 16 Sept 2007 from cardiac amyloidosis. Jordan announced he had been diagnosed with the disease in March 2006 and vowed to beat the odds, but determination and gumption sometimes just aren't enough in the face of a disease with a median survival time of just over two years. Jordan was in the process of writing the twelfth and final book in the Wheel of Time series, A Memory of Light, but the book was not slated for release until 2009 and is still incomplete. While there is hope that the book will still be finished from Jordan's notes, this is devastating news to all of us who have been reading the series since 1990."

571 comments

  1. a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    While I don't like to be the one to "flog a dead horse". The Wheel of time Series has been in a downward spiral since about book 5. Disjointed, dragging out endless plot lines in a poor attempt to make it to book 12. Personally I hope they don't bother to put book 12 together, I stopped at 9.

    1. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by tuxlove · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Personally I hope they don't bother to put book 12 together, I stopped at 9.

      There are thousands of people who have hung on for 17 years to reach the end of the tale, regardless of how much it had deteriorated in the later books. I have been unhappy with the most recent books myself, but I still wanted to find out what happens nonetheless. I probably speak for the majority of his readers in this. I'm saddened by his passing, and it would be even sadder if the story were never finished. It's almost certainly what he would have wanted.

      I hope his notes at least reveal the outcome to whomever picks up the story. (Orson Scott Card, are you available?)

    2. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by stoolpigeon · · Score: 5, Funny

      Card? It must really have gotten pretty bad.

      --
      It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    3. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by Rei · · Score: 5, Funny

      "In the spirit of the man, friends and family of the deceased have requested that his eulogy be tedious and poorly written."

      --
      Then the winter came, and the Grasshopper died. And the Octopus ate all his acorns. Also, he got a racecar.
    4. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      a blessing on readers of Wheel of time Go fuck yourself. A great fantasy author has died and you mock him. Robert Jordan broke away from the standard cookie cutter fantasy epic outline. Whether the overall quality went down or not he did write some great stories. And that is what he will be remembered for--not some disappointed fanboy who criticizes a great author in the same way a sports jock criticizes Joe Montana for not being as good as he was in his prime.
    5. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by aichpvee · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I thought that he was finally getting back into form toward the end, especially the second half of #11. I'm sorry to see him go.

      --
      The Farewell Tour II
    6. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by Randle_Revar · · Score: 1

      I feel that 8 was the worst. 9 was slightly better, and 10 and 11 where pretty good.

      This is really sad. RIP, RJ

    7. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by MutualDisdain · · Score: 0, Troll

      Let's analyze a few aspects of your post:

      1) It was anonymous.

      That means that even though Jordan had the balls to place his pen name on the 11 books in the series, you lack the nuts to do the same for one short post.

      2) It critiqued an 11 book series with knowledge obtained from reading them.

      That means that despite the writing being, "disjointed," and "dragging" in your opinion, after book 5 you continued to read for 6 more books. That either makes you a moron, or a disingenuous liar.

      No person in their right mind would continue reading a series of books that they hated, by an author who's writing style irked them so much.

      3) You have disrespected the dead.

      I know, in these modern times we live in, the dead are just proper nouns on the screen, and no one gets hurt... right? What happens when the family of the author reads your trite and useless comments at the top of the replies to this story?

      Are life and death so trivial to you that you have to wield elitism at the dead? Are you really overcompensating that much? I'll let you figure that one out.

      My guess is that you are one of those people who think, "Hey, I could write. I could write if I could just find the time and will to sit down and do it." You probably have a negative comment to say about every movie you see, every tv show that you watch, and every book that you read. You think you have been gifted by some divine ability to discern the plot holes, and flaws in every narratives...

      Well guess what.... Its all in your head. Yet another successful author has died, yet another year has passed, and you have accomplished nothing but trolling yet another message board.

      Perhaps you need to get over your fear of "doing" and actually try to create something that isn't a critique for once. Why don't you put yourself out there for the masses to chew on for a while, and see if you are the God given gift your ego claims you to be.

      In other words, shit or get off the pot. Stop being a worthless critic, and do something that has some value to society. Anyone can be a self important asshole, but are you brave enough to take a few turds in the face for posterity?

      --
      - Yes, I am posting at a -1, and no I will not use a proxy to bypass my circumstances.
    8. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by Drawkcab · · Score: 4, Funny

      If Card took the helm, 60% of the final book would involve Olver as the protagonist, and Rand would become a thinly veiled allegory of Joseph Smith.

    9. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by MutualDisdain · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Yet another self-important SlashDot post in which the writer elevates himself to the position of critic. This time the elitist pretends that despite accomplishing nothing of import within the confines of his own life, that he is qualified to tear down the accomplishments of another.

      Here's a news flash for you. Yet another year has passed and you are still not published. Robert Jordan succeeded while you continue to fail.

      When publishers start giving million dollar advances to people who troll message boards in search of self-confidence, shoot me a gloating private message. Until then, you might want to consider what it will be like 20 years from now when absolutely nothing will have changed in your life... Yes, you will still be working the same mediocre IT job...

      --
      - Yes, I am posting at a -1, and no I will not use a proxy to bypass my circumstances.
    10. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Y'know, I'm all for respecting the dead, but there is absolutely NOTHING WRONG with criticizing the dead, even with calling an asshole an asshole, or a hack a hack. I didn't really have a problem with the parent's post--it was a little snarky, sure, but nothing that needed a massive wall of text response like you gave it.

      Since you seemingly can't handle someone knocking an author you like, I shudder to think how you'll react to this--which is a direct criticism of YOU.

    11. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by MutualDisdain · · Score: 1

      I have only read 3 books written by Robert Jordan. I don't think my response was a wall of text so much as a large ASC-II mirror. Despite missing the fact that the OP stated that he stopped after book 9, I think I painted a fairly accurate portrait of his ego, and lack of will towards living a life that actually contains significant events.

      It is one thing to criticize a writer, it is quite another thing to do it on their death bed before they've even had a proper funeral. A fair critique also doesn't sum up someone's entire career as the few books he may have misfired on. It contains the good and the bad.

      I have a real problem with elitism, and elitists in general. (this is where you dissect my post and find a way to make the empty pot calling the kettle black argument)

      I strongly dislike people who are pompous, rude, and arrogant in their assessment of the world around them. I don't mind negative opinions, so much as people who elevate themselves while they condescend upon others.

      I am tired of the notion that being a "nerd" automatically entitles someone to be a dick. I'm sure all of these assholes are ten times smarter than myself, but humility warrants greater respect than pissing contests with the dead.

      --
      - Yes, I am posting at a -1, and no I will not use a proxy to bypass my circumstances.
    12. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by olman · · Score: 1

      There are thousands of people who have hung on for 17 years to reach the end of the tale, regardless of how much it had deteriorated in the later books.

      Wow.

      That must have been some deteriorating. Having personally given up on part 4 or thereabouts.

      AFAIK the series was really supposed to be trilogy, but as soon as the sales figures came in, the man just went on churning. In fact I think he said pretty much the same in early (90s) interview.

    13. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      "Here's a news flash for you. Yet another year has passed and you are still not published. Robert Jordan succeeded while you continue to fail."

      I've never been a big fan of this argument. Yeah yeah, he was successful. However, we wrote his books such that they be enjoyed by the people reading them. If he failed to do that, then yes, people have a right to be critical. Afterall, these books were published to be consumed by the very people you're criticizing, not to impress the writing community with their whoop-de-dooedness.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    14. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by bigstrat2003 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If he failed to do that Aha, but he didn't. I personally, and all my friends who read Wheel of Time, loved it. Including the later books that are being reviled here. I also am reasonably certain that we aren't alone. Just because not everyone liked the whole series, doesn't mean he failed to make his books enjoyable.
      --
      "16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
    15. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by zoney_ie · · Score: 1

      I've avoided starting the series, based on the frustration of people I know who've read the books faithfully and have been hanging on for so long.

      I think I'll still wait till some semblence of a final book is pulled together and published.

      --
      -- *~()____) This message will self-destruct in 5 seconds...
    16. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by scoot80 · · Score: 1

      Seemingly you can't handle him knowing who criticized him?

    17. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by ushering05401 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      IIRC you are correct about the WOT being a trilogy.

      Jordan's passing is all the more disheartening for this. He could have been an epic figure in fantasy lit, but he gave in to the marketing drones.

      I absolutely loved the series until the last chapters of book three. His legacy is fucked now. The later books in the WOT series are as unreadable as his work on the Conan series.

      Anyhow... RIP Jordan. You wrote more good lit than I ever did, even if the good material was the vast minority of your output.

    18. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by MutualDisdain · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Criticizing someone on their death bed before they've had a proper burial is just wrong any way you look at it. If Robert Jordan had been Hitler or Charles Manson, then I could completely understand it.

      This was simply a science fiction writer who was successful at what he did. Whether you think that success was warranted or not, you can surely hold your tongue (with your fingers so you can't type) until he's been properly laid to rest.

      The OP was yet another elitist who thinks his ego entitles him to cross all the bounds of morality and decency. He thought nothing of the writer's family, his rabid fans, or of the simple protocol entitled to all members of humanity. His only goal was to sew another one-liner rag into his poorly tailored ego, and gain praise for making a shallow joke.

      There's nothing wrong with hating Jordan's books, but have some manners with the timing of it, and when you do it, don't act like a pompous ass.

      --
      - Yes, I am posting at a -1, and no I will not use a proxy to bypass my circumstances.
    19. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by speaker+of+the+truth · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Did you just say that the writer dying is a blessing? How fucking offensive, especially to those of us who were as close to him in the end as we possibly could be as fans. I hope the death of no-one you care about is called a fucking blessing.

      --
      Using openSUSE instead of Windows since 9th of October, 2007 and liking it.
    20. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course you are not a fan of this argument. You have no defense. Admitting that you could never accomplish even a tenth of what Robert Jordan accomplished and then asserting that you have a right to criticize his works rings sort of hollow doesn't it? You just know you could have done them better except you know you could not. The only way that you know how to resolve this contradiction is to just ignore it altogether.

      So what about people who can actually write and are published? What are they writing? I'll give you a hint before I set you on your task to google the answer: they held extremely high respect for RJ's works.

      So why should I listen to a disgruntled fanboy over published authors? And what do you think those published authors would be saying about your criticism?

    21. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by davester666 · · Score: 5, Funny

      There are thousands of people who have hung on for 17 years to reach the end of the tale

      The curse of buying from a supplier with a single-source. If you're smart enough to buy a plain beige box made of parts from 30 low-bidders, that can run a variety of operating systems, you should be smart enough to buy novels written the same way. That way, if once of the writers dies, any number of other low-bidders can just pick up where he/she left off

      Honestly, buying a novel from a series written by a single writer is like buying a Mac. Sure, the writing might be a little better than if it were written as a collaboration, but it's TOTAL VENDOR LOCK-IN!

      Never buy a book from a series unless it has at least 3 authors!

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    22. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by Skreems · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Welcome to the internet, where nothing is sacred. Try not to let it bother you.

      --
      Slashdot needs a "-1, Wrong" moderation option.
      The Urban Hippie
    23. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by jesdynf · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      He didn't succeed, he merely made money. Considering he's an author, not even a lot of money. The books were crap, this was widely understood. Deal.

      --
      Yahoo! Pipes are awesome. How awesome? http://pipes.yahoo.com/jesdynf/slashdot
    24. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by Xiaran · · Score: 4, Funny

      I agree with you. I just cant decide if that would be better or worse :)

    25. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by jinxidoru · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It's so true. He should have done what R.A. Salvatore has done. Rather than taking his trilogy and making it 12 books long, he just wrote another trilogy using the same characters and then another. Then he wrote a prequel trilogy and so on ad infinitum. The end result is a story-line that is nearly as long as WoT, but is manageable because you take it in chunks. Each series of books is fairly self-contained, and tells a story in itself while still leaving enough loose ends on which to base another series of books.

      Actually, now, as I am writing, I am reminded of the best at this, Terry Pratchett. You don't even have to read the books in order. He really is a genius at making every book completely self-contained, yet having them still sit in a larger story line. In many of his trilogies I have actually read the second or third before the first, and it made complete sense.

    26. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by shaitand · · Score: 1

      That's a pretty rough criticism of a man who wrote a story that would humble Tolkien himself. While it may be difficult to follow the individual plots of dozens of major and semi-major characters, that is a shortcoming of the readers mind and not the author.

    27. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by Spillman · · Score: 1

      Just an FYI from the FAQ at Dragonmount: http://www.dragonmount.com/Faq/index.php?action=artikel&cat=2&id=4&artlang=en

      It's sad to hear this news even if I stopped reading somewhere in book 10 because it just got too boring and drawn out. I have always wondered how it will end.

      --
      sig?
    28. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a whole 'nother argument, and one that I find very amusing when it pops up on slashdot. 99% of users are all for anonymity, except when the person they're arguing with posts as AC--as if knowing someone's slashdot login is any better.

    29. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by arth1 · · Score: 1

      That would be a clash of styles, indeed. Plus, these days, Orson Scott Card can't help but proselytising -- he's become as bad as Stephen R. Lawhead, although better researched and written.

      For a ghost writer, why not use one of the prolific writers who don't have a style of their own, but churn out book after book with sometimes better quality than the books they copy the plots and character types from? Someone like Barbara Hambly or Simon R. Green?

    30. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 0, Troll

      Oh, shut up. The series is my favorite ever, and in my opinon amazing even when it lost direction, but that was funny. Go soak your head.

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    31. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hear, hear!

    32. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by MutualDisdain · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I'm not acting. I really am the person you describe. I have an opinion, and it is absolutely what I believe. I hate elitists, and I love to see them fall on their faces.

      --
      - Yes, I am posting at a -1, and no I will not use a proxy to bypass my circumstances.
    33. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by kamapuaa · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I love this classic argument. Anyone who's never made a successful movie can never say Uwe Boll movies are crap. Anyone who's never been Miss Missouri can never say that chick gave an air-headed response. Anyone who's never written a #1 best-selling book can never say the Wheel of Time series is tedious.

      --
      Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
    34. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by MutualDisdain · · Score: 1

      If the series is your favorite, then surely that warrants a bit of respect for the author and his family. Why not wait a week for the family to morn before you start supporting trolls who's sole goal is to elevate his own ego at the expense of the mourners. I'll soak my head, if you'll put your's back on straight.

      --
      - Yes, I am posting at a -1, and no I will not use a proxy to bypass my circumstances.
    35. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I have a real problem with elitism, and elitists in general. (this is where you dissect my post and find a way to make the empty pot calling the kettle black argument)"

      I don't really have to dissect your post since the paragraph right after that one describes your own behavior perfectly:

      "I strongly dislike people who are pompous, rude, and arrogant in their assessment of the world around them. I don't mind negative opinions, so much as people who elevate themselves while they condescend upon others."

      And from your other comments in the thread it's obvious that you're a huge snob. Seriously--step back a bit and re-read your posts. You come off like a grade A elitist dick, going completely off the deep end OVER A DAMNED SLASHDOT COMMENT, belittling people for holding opinions you don't agree with, and expressing them in a manner you don't approve of, which seems to be the greater crime in your eyes.

      And as icing on the cake--the comment you got so worked up over wasn't even that offensive to begin with.

    36. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by Minwee · · Score: 1

      And yet, like millions of other people around the world, I know who he is.

      Who are you?

    37. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by MutualDisdain · · Score: 1

      Success is achieving a desired goal. For instance, if your goal was to pretend to be wealthy, then you my friend have succeeded. You are so bombastic that now you are claiming to know the hearts and minds of all of Jordan's readers. Perhaps you should go into politics or advertising with that self-important intuition of your's.

      --
      - Yes, I am posting at a -1, and no I will not use a proxy to bypass my circumstances.
    38. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by robotoverflow · · Score: 1

      The problem is one of your assumptions is that the writer of the joke is an elitist. My perception of intent isn't accurate at all times, as I'd assume is the case for most people, but judging from that joke alone I couldn't detect a hint of elitism. It may be that I don't assume that everyone trying to entertain others with humour, even at the expense of others, is merely trying to boost their ego.

      Of course, my definition of elitism might differ to yours somehow, though I don't think it should be stretched to include anyone who doesn't share your particular opinion of what proper etiquette is.

      --
      % mkdir :
      % ls -dF :
      :/
    39. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by shadowless · · Score: 1

      Knife of Dreams (book 11) was not that bad (or was it "Harry Potter and the Knife of Dreams"?) It was even comparable to the first 4 books (OK, not quite, but a little bit...) On the other hand, maybe the wait for book eleven and the disaster that was book ten made KoD look better than it actually was.

      --
      Programming is the art that actually fights back!
    40. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 1

      I'm not disrespecting him in the slightest, and if I'm at all right about the type of person he was then Rigney himself would have agreed. It takes a certain amount of respect for a person to think they would be able to laugh in the face of a loss like this, and by all accounts he and everyone he surrounded himself with were those types of people. Maybe not tonight, but probably in a couple days, and I think it will be at least that long before Harriet has time to sign on to Slashdot and browse down to the 200th comment. We're just fans, we weren't close enough that we should be crying. I have a heavy heart, and God, I shouldn't feel like this over somebody I've never even met, but laugh, man. Death is lighter than a feather, he found time to put the mountain down.

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    41. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by jesdynf · · Score: 0

      Neither OJ Simpson or either of the brothers Hussein. You falsely equate name recognition with success or worth. You, too, may deal.

      --
      Yahoo! Pipes are awesome. How awesome? http://pipes.yahoo.com/jesdynf/slashdot
    42. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Of course you are not a fan of this argument."

      That's because it's fallacious: aside from being an appeal to authority and argument ad hominem, your reasoning makes it impossible to criticize anyone unless I can do the things they do. I can't criticize the president because I'm not a politician. I can't criticize windows because I'm not a programmer. Also, very conveniently for your own ego, I can't criticize you because I'm not a raging, hemorrhoidal asshole.

      But I can criticize Robert Jordan because I am a published author.

    43. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by MutualDisdain · · Score: 1

      Anonymous, you don't have to be afraid to respond with your real handle. If the comments you and others are making in the wake of Jordan's death are truly just respectful and warranted criticisms of the man, then there is no reason to hide your face in shame.

      If the trolls here are really just making innocent DAMNED SLASHDOT COMMENTS then why are they doing it in their Ymous, Anon guises? What does anyone have to hide if they are just giving their opinion?

      The reason they are hiding their true name is because they are afraid they will be pegged for the pompous arses that they are. They're afraid their internet friends will not like them any more if they realize the true bombastic nature that compels them to post and disrespect the dead.

      If I am the snob, then why have I only responded to the rude and arrogant posts? Why have I ignored the fair posts that criticize Jordan while offering respect? If I have such a problem with differing opinions, why have I only focuses on Ymous, Anon's?

      I don't know. People will judge me as they will. If I am the dick here then that must make you Prince Albert.

      Though I think in the greater scheme of things, trying to have a pissing contest with a dead man using an anonymous handle is far worse than thumping elitists for disrespecting the dead on a message board.

      --
      - Yes, I am posting at a -1, and no I will not use a proxy to bypass my circumstances.
    44. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by jesdynf · · Score: 0, Troll

      Problem here is that I do know both the heart *and* mind of one of Jordan's (former) readers. And the phrase "widely understood to be true" is basically not subject to debate; the *number* of people who think the books are crap can be discussed, and the degree to which they are perceived by these people to be crap is open to interpretation, but they exist and there's a friggin' lot of them, which is probably why the man has become synonymous with -- why am I explaining? You know the faults better than I do, I'm sure.

      Anyways. All the three-dollar words in the world aren't going to change the basic fact that there's a lot of people who (a) didn't like him, (b) cheerfully insult his most notable published work, (c) want their money back, (d) post here, and (e) do not appear to be afraid of your censure. Deal.

      --
      Yahoo! Pipes are awesome. How awesome? http://pipes.yahoo.com/jesdynf/slashdot
    45. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "You say what you bloody want to, but you watch how you flaming say it, or I'll bloody skin you myself, and burn the goat-kissing hide, you sheep-gutted milk-drinker."

    46. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by MutualDisdain · · Score: 1

      So, you think it is funny to say that someone you respect's entire career was a farce based on bad writing? I would hate to see how you treat those you disdain.

      You can be jovial and give him an Irish wake without roasting the departed. Let the morticians handle that task.

      --
      - Yes, I am posting at a -1, and no I will not use a proxy to bypass my circumstances.
    47. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by bm_luethke · · Score: 1

      And there are even more people that like the series and think you are a fucking idiot (for various different reasons). Until you become the God of Fiction I truly doubt your ability to declare a best seller as "crap" to be more than your opinion. Deal.

      --
      ------- Sorry about the spelling, I suffer from two problems. Dyslexia makes it difficult to spell well, lazy makes it
    48. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by MutualDisdain · · Score: 1, Redundant

      Ah of course, you are the pulse of human consciousness itself. You are the cold stethoscope on the flat chested nerd-body...

      Every man has faults, but not every man has the dignity to respect the dead on the day of their death. Jordan was not a saint, or Shakespeare, but he also wasn't Hitler or Mussolini. Why don't you give the man a couple of days of respect before you start making yourself feel important by tearing down his career?

      You can make this a multiple choice, or you can make this a true false question. Do you have the simple human dignity to allow a man's body to grow cold before you belittle everything he accomplished in his life? Is your ego so needy and shallow that it needs that beat a corpse to make it feel better?

      --
      - Yes, I am posting at a -1, and no I will not use a proxy to bypass my circumstances.
    49. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Yet another self-important SlashDot post in which the writer elevates himself to the position of critic.
      Yes, yes yes, we get the message. But enough about you, what about the one you're replying to?
      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    50. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 1

      You seem to be unable to disconnect from your gut reactions, even when they're wrong. I've known many people with the same problem, and even dated one for more than a year, so I know what that must be like for you and I'm very sorry. I'll say this even though it will do absolutely no good: #1: Nobody who has a right to be hurt by anything we say will ever read this. #2: Laughing at a critisism commonly-repeated by people who can't appreciate the story properly, warts and all, and realize that it's still one of the best series of novels since they started being made, is far from calling their entire career a farce. At a roast, you're laughing at the jokes, not the person.

      As proof of my experience in dealing with victims of your particular handicap, I'm going to e-walk away now, and I'm not coming back no matter how much you scream :P

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    51. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by MutualDisdain · · Score: 1

      Oh no, I think we're caught in an endless For loop now. See, I said I'm rubber and you're glue, then you said I'm glue and you're rubber, and this could just keep going all night...

      Or I guess it would if you had actually said anything accurate. See, most people here at least try to add something new to the conversation instead of cutting and pasting "I know you are but what am I" comments all night.

      --
      - Yes, I am posting at a -1, and no I will not use a proxy to bypass my circumstances.
    52. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by MutualDisdain · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      If you think family and friends of Jordan aren't reading the web, and don't subscribe to SlashDot, then you are living in a deluded world. This is called the internet for a reason, and that is because it allows absolutely everyone in the world to connect and interact. You may think this is a bubble in which it is safe to disrespect a good man on the eve of his death, but you might as well have laughed at that joke in his widow's face.

      I'm not the overseer of morality here. I just finally snappped tonight. After seeing one too many pompous Slashdot assholes once again make a heartless joke at the expense of others.

      You're entitled to believe that making a parody of a man's eulogy on his death bed is appropriate, but most sensible and respectful people have the heart to let the family grieve before they take baseball bats to a man's remaining presence on earth. That presence is the work he did while he was still alive...

      Think about it and have a good night.

      --
      - Yes, I am posting at a -1, and no I will not use a proxy to bypass my circumstances.
    53. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      This was simply a science fiction writer who was successful at what he did.

      No, he was a fantasy writer. How low the label "SF" has sunk that anyone could think a magical Tolkien-derivative story was SF.

    54. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by MutualDisdain · · Score: 1

      I do love anonymous punctuation nazis this early in the morning. It must be sad to have to attack an apostrophe when the content of the message becomes overwhelming. Though, I would much rather have you attack grammar than someone's deceased loved one.

      --
      - Yes, I am posting at a -1, and no I will not use a proxy to bypass my circumstances.
    55. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      I have only read 3 books written by Robert Jordan.
      The person you're disagreeing with has read nine. That's three times as many. While that doesn't necessarily make him more informed than you, that's the way I'd bet, especially considering the total absence of evidence to the contrary.

      I have a real problem with elitism, and elitists in general.
      An interesting definition of elitism - reading a book before having an opinion of it.

      I strongly dislike people who are pompous, rude, and arrogant in their assessment of the world around them.
      I could comment here but it's not really necessary, is it?
      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    56. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by vux984 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That's a pretty rough criticism of a man who wrote a story that would humble Tolkien himself.

      I doubt it. Tolkien knew how to tell a story. In particular he knew that not everything that he ever envisioned happening on the face on the face of middle earth should be puked out into the Lord of the Rings trilogy.

      Tolkien could let characters like Gandalf go off on side quests without covering every detail. We only knew Gandalf was rescued by the eagles - that's about all that's in the book. Jordon would have taken us on that flight. We know he found his way back to Rivendell; Jordon would have taken us on that walk. At one point Sam is cooking some rabbits he caught - Jordon would have made damned sure we knew exactly how and where they were caught. And gollum? Jordon would have been sure to cover everything he did too... from leaving the mountains, to being captured and tortured, to his release, and tracked him all the way back to Moria. When the sword that was broken was remade, we didn't have half a book dedicated to the tale, nor the tale of its delivery.

      Tolkien's world is famous because of its immense depth and detail. Lord of the Rings is good writing because while you get a sense of all the depth and detail, its history, and its complexity. Very little of it is actually in the book; you know its there because you can see its 'edges'; but Tolkien didn't try to tell EVERYBODY'S story. He knew better.

      Consider that Tolkien had the fellowship break up. He elected to chase essentially 3 paths, not ALL of them. We could have had books dedicated to what Gandalf was doing, we could have followed Boromir's boat over the falls and into the hand's Faramir, and followed Faramir from there. We could have followed Wormtongue after he was cast out of Theoden's throne room back to Isendgard, or followed the Ents after they were roused... but we didn't.

      And had we done so, it would not have improved the book.

      At the other end of good 'epic' writing is the Foundation Trilogy by Asimov. Its the complete opposite of Tolkien - Asimov tells the story of the galactic empire seen through shifting perspectives at critical turning points. The effect works. You see Seldon's vision unfold, and though the vignettes are character driven and you connect with the characters, at the end of each vignette you see the big picture take another step forward.

      While it may be difficult to follow the individual plots of dozens of major and semi-major characters, that is a shortcoming of the readers mind and not the author.

      What is the Wheel of Time about exactly? Its not really about anything because its about everything. And its not about everything because its spends to much time focused on the minutia of individuals. It tries to paint a forest by telling you the story of every tree. And in the end you have neither a good sense of the forest, nor any decent connection to any particular trees.

      That's not the failure of the reader, that's a failure of the author. Because its a poor way to tell a story.

    57. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      a story that would humble Tolkien himself

      I don't want to disrespect the recently dead, but get a grip. Jordan may have been entertaining, but he was no Tolkien. He's popular now. In 20 years he'll be dust. Tolkien will be being reprinted for the thousandth time.

    58. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't have a slashdot account. I don't really see the point. And I have nothing to hide. My name is James, and you can visit my website ( 30underdc.com ) and send me some nasty emails if you really want to. Or do a whois and send me some nasty snail mail.

      And as for hiding my true name...well, you must have some very unusual parents to have a name like "Mutual Disdain." The difference between anonymity and pseudonimity is vanishingly small, particularly on the internet and especially on a site like slashdot.

      I should also point out that I'm not the original "blessing" poster--in fact I haven't said a single unkind word about Mr. Jordan. I just happen to think you're a dumbass. Or a masterful troll.

    59. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by MutualDisdain · · Score: 1

      I am not arguing for or against Jordan's strength as a writer. Rather, I am arguing for a little bit of respect for a man who has just passed.

      Yes, I believe that anyone who has to belittle a man hours after he has died to make themselves feel whole has a psychological problem. I don't care if their comments are warranted or not, a lack of respect for the dead shows the true character of a person.

      If you can't hold your tongue or fingers for just a few days after someone has died, then you probably are one of the 10% of men who walk the Earth as unfeeling sociopaths.

      --
      - Yes, I am posting at a -1, and no I will not use a proxy to bypass my circumstances.
    60. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by CRCulver · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Card is an author that started out great and somewhere decided to market to the lowest-common denominator and churn out endless sequels. It was certainly that way with the Alvin Maker series. Red Prophet is one of the finest fantasy books I've ever read, but all home that the Alvin Maker series would continue at such a high level were dashed when Alvin Journeyman came out, and it only got worse from there. Perhaps Card's turn for the worst happened around 1994-1995 when he was at work on both Alvin Journeyman, the last Homecoming book, and the fourth Ender novel, all of which were very disappointing. Now, this author who started out making real contributions to science fiction as legitimate literature is just an airport paperback writer.

      Similarly, Jordan started out very fine, but around the fourth book of The Wheel of Time, when the series really took off and every high-schooler was reading it, he started to meander and stretch things out. One does wonder if Tor, the publisher of both Card and Jordan, put any pressure on them to produce unnecessarily long material.

    61. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by somersault · · Score: 1

      And if the writers put out the plot under an appropriately open license, then others can take the good parts and put them into their own books, possibly with improvements! With enough iterations, we will soon have the best book in the world!

      --
      which is totally what she said
    62. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by somersault · · Score: 2

      That's what I was thinking, and I haven't even read any of the books (my bro has so maybe that's how I got the impression that they were fantasy rather than SF). This guy obviously hasn't read the books either, though he is trying to defend this guy's honour in his death. I still found the original joke kind of funny, though ever so slightly distasteful.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    63. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by NerveGas · · Score: 2, Funny

      And there's be naked boys wrestling in a steamy shower.

      --
      Oh, you're not stuck, you're just unable to let go of the onion rings.
    64. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      ...and how low have Science Fiction readers fallen that they are unable to appreciate that all but the hardest and most near-future Sci-fi stories are just magical machines in the future?

      And those that say they only read ultra hard factual science based Sci-Fi don't have the slightest understanding of what Science Fiction actually is, and should go back to reading research papers for their amusement.

    65. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One is highly tempted to flamebait, but will leave it to "Joseph was one Smith with a sub-optimal contribution to history".

    66. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by smittyoneeach · · Score: 1

      I've read all of the published material in WoT.
      I don't blame Jordan so much as the editors.
      As with so many series "of size" these days, it would have been twice as good if it was half as long.
      And without so many dangling threads--there was a vicious golem running around snuffing people somewhere in the vicinity of book 5. Where did that thing go?
      Based on the blog posts, though, there should be one uncut monster of a tome about the size of a small refrigerator to tie things up in a year or two.
      Let this be a lesson for George R. R. Martin...

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    67. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by benliu · · Score: 1

      Agreed - the EU should have sued Robert for being a monopoly...

    68. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by s_p_oneil · · Score: 1

      I agree with you, and 9 was definitely the bottom of the barrel. Books 10 and 11 were a good deal better, though. Things would have to be moving really fast in 12 to wrap everything up.

    69. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 1

      The Wheel of time Series has been in a downward spiral since about book 5. Disjointed, dragging out endless plot lines in a poor attempt to make it to book 12. Personally I hope they don't bother to put book 12 together, I stopped at 9.

      Same here. After about book 4 or 5, I got the sense that rather than going for a great story, he was dragging out the series as long as possible. That's when I said, "screw it".

      I also looked at his photo on the back of the book, and I was pretty sure he'd have some cardiac-related death before he concluded the series.

      Poor guy.

    70. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by mike2R · · Score: 2

      Completely agree with you. I do agree with some of the critisism of the later books - when you wait for 18 months, only get about 5 days further in the story and mostly deal with minor characters you've forgotten about in the intervening time, it does get a little annoying. But having recently reread all 11 books back to back, I enjoyed it a great deal more. I *like* long books with multiple sub-plots. I will read and I'm sure enjoy book 12, and the longer and more comprehensive it is the better as far as I'm concerned. I just wish he'd been able to finish it himself.

      --
      This sig all sigs devours
    71. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by Metasquares · · Score: 1

      And a million different forks, each having a different plot (different details of how the plot is realized, anyway). Which one becomes canon? Or do they all? :)

    72. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by mahlerfan999 · · Score: 1

      I absolutely loved the series until the last chapters of book three. But the first part of the series was just warmed over LOTR. Especially the first book, it was just a carbon copy. Anyone who thinks that the very beginning of the series was the best part must be a Terry Brooks fan, because seriously jesus.
      For me, books 4 and 5 are the highlight of the series. Jordan finally finds his own voice and really establishes what the series is about, and breaks free from the cliche. And then book 6 and on RJ just got bogged down in minor characters and plotlines.
    73. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can I get a -1, Unnecessarily Disturbing Mental Imagery over here?

    74. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by TheRaven64 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Speaking as a writer, I would have no objections to someone making the same comment as the grandparent about me, after my death. It's funny, and if you can't take a joke at your own expense then being dead is the least of your worries. The 'give the family time to grieve' argument doesn't make much sense. This is Slashdot. If members of the family read this site, they will know what kind of comment to expect, and delay reading it for a bit if they think it will upset them.

      The most depressing funeral I have been to was that of a close friend of mine, where a large number of people who barely knew him stood up and spouted meaningless platitudes about what a great guy he was, many of them untrue. I would much rather have someone put some effort into a witty insult at my funeral than spout meaningless praise.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    75. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm only human.

    76. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by mahlerfan999 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's so true. He should have done what R.A. Salvatore has done. Rather than taking his trilogy and making it 12 books long, he just wrote another trilogy using the same characters and then another. Then he wrote a prequel trilogy and so on ad infinitum. The end result is a story-line that is nearly as long as WoT, but is manageable because you take it in chunks. Each series of books is fairly self-contained, and tells a story in itself while still leaving enough loose ends on which to base another series of books. Actually, now, as I am writing, I am reminded of the best at this, Terry Pratchett. You don't even have to read the books in order. He really is a genius at making every book completely self-contained, yet having them still sit in a larger story line. In many of his trilogies I have actually read the second or third before the first, and it made complete sense. But that's just the style that *you* like. Jordan was writing an epic, there is a difference you know. Writers shouldn't conform to simply the most digestible, easiest format for readers. Else we would only have short stories anyway! lol For what Salvatore and Pratchett wanted to do, the standalone novel works, but for what Jordan, Martin, Elliott and others are trying to write (high fantasy epics) standalone novels will not work, even trilogies won't really work. They want to fully embrace complexity to show the unfolding of events that effect an entire world, you can only do that with a tapestry of characters and plotlines. If you don't like that kind of story, then just don't read it. Don't demand that the authors conform to your taste.
    77. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by ShakaUVM · · Score: 1

      He didn't give in to marketing drones. According to Ryan Dancey, Jordan pitches the series as a "neverending saga" that would result in unbounded book sales to the publishing house.

      I think the series shows this, as it starts running out of steam around book 3 or 4, and limps along through book 11 and a prequel.

      I met the guy in 2004, and I'm certainly sad he died, but he definitely dropped the ball on the series.

      I'm finishing up the Night's Fall series by Peter Hamilton right now, who does follow as many characters as Jordan, but does a damn good job telling the stories and weaving the characters' plot lines together. Great, great trilogy (or 6-book-ology if you buy the softcovers).

    78. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by mahlerfan999 · · Score: 1

      I thought that he was finally getting back into form toward the end, especially the second half of #11. I'm sorry to see him go. I agree, I thought it his last installment was almost at the level of #4 and 5 (my favorites) and a big step up from the last several. Everything was starting to unravel, and everything was falling into place for the Last Battle. I had a strong feeling that the final volume was going to be worth the wait, and then looking back at the series as a whole (instead of judging by sum of parts) it will be judged much better by people than it is now. Well I guess we'll never know.
    79. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Tolkien knew how to tell a story.

      Well, to be more accurate, Tolkien knew how to construct a plot. As far as actually "telling a story", the man pretty much stunk up the page. His prose is so dry and boring and hard to read that I've never been able to finish the books. I know I'm not alone in finding his writing unbearable.

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    80. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      I am not arguing for or against Jordan's strength as a writer.
      But this is a public forum. Most of the public, if they know him at all, know him as such; that's to say, they know him through or by his books.

      Now he might be an affable and amusing drinking companion; he might be a kind and friendly next-door neighbour (and nobody is disputing that) but given normal urban topologies that would apply to a handful of people at most, none of whom is likely to be you.

      Rather, I am arguing for a little bit of respect for a man who has just passed.
      No you aren't. You're arguing against people who don't like his books when they've read them and you haven't. The man != his books. Not rocket surgery, is it?

      Yes, I believe that anyone who has to belittle a man hours after he has died to make themselves feel whole has a psychological problem.
      You seem to have missed the subtle distinction between the man and his works. Until you manage to demonstrate this fundamental level of logical understanding there's little point in even attempting a rational discussion with you. I'm not sure if there's a generic name for the mass hysteria around the death of $celebrity (a la Diana Spencer), but if there isn't then MutualDisdain Syndrome has to be a contender.

      If you can't hold your tongue or fingers for just a few days after someone has died, then you probably are one of the 10% of men who walk the Earth as unfeeling sociopaths.
      There surely is a name for that - projection.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    81. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Anonymous, you don't have to be afraid to respond with your real handle.
      Ad anonymum is a just a special case of ad hominem; if you can't attack the messsge, don't attack the messenger. Mmmkay?
      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    82. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by Poromenos1 · · Score: 1

      I have only read the first book of the series and found it quite great. Does it get worse later on? Why are you saying this?

      --
      Send email from the afterlife! Write your e-will at Dead Man's Switch.
    83. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by jeffasselin · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      This fascination with "proper burial" intrigues me. He's dead. Inanimate matter with no more consciousness than a rock. Not human anymore. How does a burial change that?

      --
      If he explores all forms and substances Straight homeward to their symbol-essences; He shall not die.
    84. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by vondo · · Score: 3, Funny

      These books were kind of like the literary version of Zeno's Paradox. In every book, less happened than in the previous book. And extra plot lines were introduced all the time. At that rate it would have never finished. Things started to pick up a bit later, but I too stopped reading. And when I heard he was sick I vowed I wouldn't read anything else until he was done with it.

    85. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by Merusdraconis · · Score: 4, Informative

      I have only read the first book of the series and found it quite great. Does it get worse later on? Why are you saying this?

      Yeeeeeep. The first three are pretty good, they probably could have stood on their own as a quite decent, though incomplete, trilogy. The fourth one is usually when people feel it starts to dip in quality, and the nadir is about the ninth book. I understand that the eleventh book is something of an improvement, but then you've got to get through the increasing amounts of filler from four through ten.

    86. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by Nimey · · Score: 1

      Surely you haven't read Book 10. *Nobody* could have enjoyed that. I nearly threw it against a wall but was bloody-minded enough to keep going (surely the plot's here /somewhere/).

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    87. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by MutualDisdain · · Score: 1

      Yes, I am projecting my worst qualities on others. Surely being able to empathize with a grieving family equates to sociopathic behavior... Are you actually thinking before you type responses to me, or are you doing as I suspect, and just parroting everything I say because you lack the depth to respond in an intelligent manner?

      When a man dies, he leaves behind his family and the work he has done. People here have been attacking both. His work is being ridiculed, and parodies of the writer's Eulogy are being trumpeted as high-brow humor, when it is nothing but pure disrespectful bile. That bile has now seeped onto the net, which can only hurt those who loved the man and what he did.

      You can pretend that attacking Jordan's work and his character are two separate notions, when in fact they intertwine many ways. Suggesting that Jordan milked the series and characters for more money, and that he hurriedly wrote the books without a care for quality is an insult on the man's character. When attacks like this occur on the day the man dies it is despicable, and a visible symptom of those without the ability to empathize with others. Anyone who has lost a close loved one knows that anything that disrespects the character of the deceased is painful and infuriating.

      I have read three of Jordan's novels, and though that does not make me his biggest fan, it certainly refutes your accusation that I have never even read his work. Apparently making a typo naming him a SF writer instead of Fantasy writer in the wee hours of the morning is enough to drive assumptions for several hours.

      Even if I had never picked up a single one of his books, I have the common decency to know how disrespectful it is to attack a man's life work on the day of his death. You, and others seem to be dysfunctional in that regard, and maybe some of you are too young to have lost someone close to you understand.

      I can only state that it is unsettling at the least, and many posts here have been shocking in their disrespect. I don't mind enduring the attacks of people who lack empathy, or moderators who give points based on opinion instead of the FAQ guidelines, but I don't think the family and fans of Jordan should have to endure such vile trolls on the day of Jordan's death.

      That is all.

      --
      - Yes, I am posting at a -1, and no I will not use a proxy to bypass my circumstances.
    88. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A person commenting on the plot of a book that he hasn't read gets modded up as "Informative"? Are the mods on crack?

      If you are going to comment on the book then you should at least have read it. I don't have extremely high requirements and I'm not an elitist, but never having read a book tends to disqualify a person from being able to intelligently describe the literary elements that--you know--make up an actual book (at least in my humble opinion). What are you going to do next, criticize Van Gogh even if you never saw one of his paintings? Or criticize Bach even if you haven't heard his music?

    89. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by BriGal · · Score: 1

      If it helps, he told Harriet (his wife) and Wilson (his cousin) exactly what happens in the last book. I think Wilson's words were "EVERYTHING". So at least someone knows how it ends.

    90. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by MutualDisdain · · Score: 1

      That may be the type of post-life tribute you prefer, but you cannot assume that every writer believes as you do. In so far as I know, Jordan left no request behind for rude humor about his work to be blogged on the day of his death. If he did, then I will stand corrected. You certainly have, and I hope those who know you well will oblige you one day.

      You seem to prefer a happy wake, and a trivial treatment of your time on Earth. You might want to check with family and friends to insure that they can deal with that when you're gone. I know that I and many other people (not everyone) would have a difficult time dealing with rude comments about our loved ones following their deaths.

      I disagree with you and the notion that the family should be the one's responsible for what they stumble upon while surfing the web. What if they are simply doing a google search for discussions about their loved one and they stumble here to read all of this? I consider it a very likely scenario that a loved one, in a time of grief, would want to be comforted by comments written by Jordan's fans.

      I can't claim to speak for the family, but I do believe there exists a base rule in human behavior that you respect the dead and the family on the day's surrounding the deceased's death.

      --
      - Yes, I am posting at a -1, and no I will not use a proxy to bypass my circumstances.
    91. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by Psmylie · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Respect for the dead is not inteaded to comfort the dead, it is to comfort the living left behind.

      --

      psmylie's dictionary: Godzillion (noun) Any number large enough to destroy Tokyo

    92. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by stoolpigeon · · Score: 1

      That is a spectacular series - though it does fall prey to Hamilton's one weakness (in my estimation). Which reminds me - I need to read Judas Unchained and see how he did finishing what he started in Pandora's star. That guy is solid.

      --
      It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    93. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by nahdude812 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      As the series progresses, the books get progressively slower up until book 11, when he starts really wrapping things up substantially. You could probably completely skip book 10 and not even notice it; at least book 9 something happened in the plot, even if it wasn't very much. Been a while since I read them, but I think the only significant plot advancement in book 10 was the rescue of someone (saving names so I don't spoil anything) from some Aiel, whose capture had happened somewhere in book 9. Their capture itself was not a significant plot element, and so far as I can tell has no outcome on the entire series other than to have given one of the major characters something to work on for book 10, which is good, because it's the only thing that happened.

      Like I said, it's been a while since I read that book, and it could be that I'm missing something, after so many books over so many years (and many re-readings of them, including most recently listening to them as audio books), what happens in which book gets blurry.

      I'm not trying to knock the series, just saying he seemed like he was stretching it out. I still think of the series fondly for all of that. I was eagerly awaiting the 12th book, and I do sincerely hope that a ghost writer is able to finish it. It's fairly epic, but the series would have been even better as 9 books.

    94. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by Psmylie · · Score: 1

      If it helps at all, book 11 wraps up a lot of the dangling plot threads. It felt a little forced to me, but it was still very satisfying.

      --

      psmylie's dictionary: Godzillion (noun) Any number large enough to destroy Tokyo

    95. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by Snocone · · Score: 1

      don't have a style of their own, ... Simon R. Green?

      Oh, come ON. You telling me I can't pick any random page out of any random book Simon R. Green has ever had published, and you wouldn't know it was written by him within half a dozen sentences at the most? Whilst I suppose strictly speaking it isn't literary style exactly aside from "parody", he certainly has an absolutely unique voice.

      And strong female characters. Those are cool. Heh-heh. Cool.

    96. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by jesdynf · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why don't you stick to one line of argument before scrambling to the next in a desperate bid to keep the last word? I spent over $100 on his books before tapping out of following a story he ultimately failed to tell. It's a legitimate criticism.

      --
      Yahoo! Pipes are awesome. How awesome? http://pipes.yahoo.com/jesdynf/slashdot
    97. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He revealed the ending to his wife/editor Harriet and his cousin Wilson, last week, so atleast the intended ending is known.

      I pity whoever has to finish the WoT for having to keep track of all his characters x-x especially the half-a-million named Aes Sedai

    98. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by MutualDisdain · · Score: 1

      How about holding your criticisms of the man and his work till at least a week after his death? If you are too hyperactive to be able to do that, then how about wording your criticisms in way that is both critical and respectful. Others have done that successfully here without having to resort to character assassinations and insensitive comments at a time when the family is grieving.

      There is no appeal to authority, ad hominem, or fallacy in arguing for a bit of decency and respect in a time of grief. Seriously.

      --
      - Yes, I am posting at a -1, and no I will not use a proxy to bypass my circumstances.
    99. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by jesdynf · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      America voted for Bush. Twice. I didn't need a majority and a PoliSci degree to be right then, and I don't need a majority and a three-novel book deal to be right now.

      --
      Yahoo! Pipes are awesome. How awesome? http://pipes.yahoo.com/jesdynf/slashdot
    100. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by Psmylie · · Score: 4, Funny

      Rule #1 of reading Tolkien: Skip the poetry.

      --

      psmylie's dictionary: Godzillion (noun) Any number large enough to destroy Tokyo

    101. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by Snocone · · Score: 1

      That's why the acronym stands for "Speculative Fiction" these days. Come on, keep up!

    102. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      During a person's life, a person tends to develop personal relationships. Any person with even marginally developed social skills understands that when such relationships are broken by something as permanent as death, there will be a need for some emotional catharsis.

      Slashdot readers are known to be pretty antisocial, and you haven't done much to break the mold. In your zeal to be provacative, I think you largely missed the point of the funeral service. It is for the people who are still alive. You know, the ones who aren't unthinking inanimate matter. I know its hip on Slashdot to take shots at people's faith, but you have missed the mark on this one. No appeals to faith here, just normal human reaction to giving the family and friends a day or two before you start pissing in his urn.

      --
      Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
    103. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by kabocox · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Actually, now, as I am writing, I am reminded of the best at this, Terry Pratchett. You don't even have to read the books in order. He really is a genius at making every book completely self-contained, yet having them still sit in a larger story line. In many of his trilogies I have actually read the second or third before the first, and it made complete sense.

      There are two author's that I have almost all their books: Terry Pratchett and Lois McMaster Bujold. Lois McMaster Bujold's Miles books (http://www.baen.com/author_catalog.asp?author=lmbujold) aren't usually as funny as Terry Pratchett, but if you are into space opera scifi at all you can easily pick up any of the Miles books and be enjoyed without having to worry about entire back stories of characters. Oh, the books are much better if you have read them all and do know all the ins and outs of the backstories, but you can lend any book of the series to a friend and usually get them hooked.

    104. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by spiderbitendeath · · Score: 2, Funny

      Robert Jordan being a monopoly? bah, Piers Anthony maintains a much higher market share with 27 books in the Xanth trilogy. That's a monopoly if I've ever seen one. That series needs to be broken into three different series, so as to provide competition in the literary world.

      --
      Sometimes when I'm working on projects things disappear, I suspect gremlins.
    105. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by ShadowsHawk · · Score: 1

      It's a matter of showing respect to the person that was. There a many people who do not hold religious meaning in death, but still choose to show an appropriate measure of respect when someone passes on.

    106. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by bloodredsun · · Score: 4, Interesting

      But there's a difference between writing multi-volume epics that cover multiple story lines and padding out the books with ad-nauseum descriptions of camps/jewellery/men and women arguing.

      Robert Louis Stephenson once wrote that his motto was "Death to the optic nerve" meaning that he wanted books where the situation of the protagonists were presented as the story went along, doing away with the need for large chunks of descriptive exposition.

      Jordan wasted his story-telling abilities with huge (try 11 pages of description of walking from one side of the camp to the other) tracts of petty details and description that did nothing to further the story or enrich the characters. This was the blatant padding that pissed of so many people that were huge fans of the first 5 or so books and then became disenchanted with the rest. It wasn't the multiple story lines or the massive number of characters - it was this repetitive (here's a camp description, here's another camp description, and here's another camp description) rubbish that polluted the later books. Winters Heart could probably be replaced by a 20 page synopsis and the first 400 pages of Crossroads at Twilight is just the rehashing of the last (admittedly important) chapter of the previous book. This isn't a stylistic style but a a plea - don't waste my time and my money.

      It is a great shame that he is no longer with us but I wonder how successful the series would be if a real editor was let loose on it? It would be condensed to about 6-8 books and may well be the greatest piece of sci-fi fantasy ever written.

    107. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by berashith · · Score: 1

      you only speak for a majority of his readers because everyone who got sick of the feet dragging and go-nowhere plot lines stopped reading entirely. I have refused to even begin reading a series until the entire things is complete because of the constant expansion of the story line from this author, and his lack of editing when his wife took over (at least that is what i heard happened around book 5 or 6). I thought the first book was incredible, and really wish the story could have kept to the original design and intended length of 4 or 5.

    108. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yet another self-important SlashDot post in which the writer elevates himself to the position of critic. [etc]

      Yet another self-important post by a /.-er tearing down another /.-er for posting their opinion on a topic. Go figure.

    109. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by BrGaribaldi · · Score: 1

      But book eleven, especially the second half, started rolling. It was all action, he started tying up some of the extreme plot threads, it gave us hope for this last book. I agree with everyone here who's said that they hope there's enough in his notes to complete the story. Jordan's vision deserves to be seen by his fans.

    110. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Simply put... F- You. Go read your Grover and the pussy cats novel, jerk off in your momma's closet and continue to lust after you second cousin you num nuts of literary knowledge. The audacity to down talk him the day after he died is about as classless as writing about it. And you did both, you sh!t for brains prick.

    111. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by mrmeval · · Score: 1

      The only thing that's sacred is nothing.

      --
      I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
    112. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by lymond01 · · Score: 1

      Let this be a lesson for George R. R. Martin...

      True...the fourth book in his Song of Ice and Fire series was, as his others, very well written, full of gritty descriptions and truly realized characters. But it didn't do much to further the plot of the overall story -- it added some things, but not much actually happened.

      I read the first Wheel of Time book back in the 90s. I don't remember much other than I thought it was bland until the end which, while exciting, wasn't all that coherent. That guy Lan, the ranger or whatever, he was pretty cool....Let me just say that I enjoy Martin's style of writing much more than Jordan's, but that's just my opinion.

    113. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by tbannist · · Score: 1

      His one weakness being slow starts? I liked Judas Unchained, though it appears that he's writing a sequel (possibly a duology) set somewhere in the (far) future of the Commonwealth.

      The guy's a solid science fiction author with sometimes amazing ideas on the possibilities of technology.

      --
      Fanatically anti-fanatical
    114. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by johnmcboston · · Score: 1

      OMG. Glad I wasn't the only person to feel this way. "we got up today and ate breakfast then I went to the other tent and we talked and then". Once our main characters broke into three groups and we had three simultaneous dragging story lines I had to finally give up. I would almost love an 'abridged' copy of the later books so I can follow the story. At least Terry Goodkind finally realized he should close out the main series so he wouldn't become like Jordan...

    115. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by delinear · · Score: 1

      Yes, it certainly seems in book 11 like the start of a big race to the finish. I was actually left thinking it would be a squeeze to fit everything into the last book that we are expecting to happen - I just wish some of the pacier action from book 11 (and most likely book 12) had been spread around in books 9 and 10. If book 12 gets a release at all, I'd love to read the entire series through from the start again, but thinking about 9/10 I'm wondering if I'd have the stamina/patience to do so...

    116. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by stoolpigeon · · Score: 1

      i'm referring to how he ended the Night's Dawn series and Fallen Dragon. but endings are tough to do well.

      --
      It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    117. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by theghost · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't blame Jordan so much as the editors. I've heard from a friend of a friend (for whatever that's worth) who is a writer that this is not missing the mark by much, but it's still Jordan who must bear the brunt of the blame. He needed a good strong editor, but his books were making so much money that he basically said to the publisher "my way or not at all" and got away with it. By the time the books got really bad so many people were hooked on the story that even the crappiest was a great money-maker so they were unwilling to reign him in.

      I don't think he was money-grubbing or stretching it on purpose. I just think he had a good story, but more ego than talent.

      Still, i would like to know how it ends and i feel sorry for his family.
      --
      The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.
    118. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by rocket+rancher · · Score: 1

      I hope his notes at least reveal the outcome to whomever picks up the story. (Orson Scott Card, are you available?)
      Has anybody asked Spider Robinson about what happens when you try to fill in for a widely admired but deceased author?
    119. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're not alone. Tolkien...man...what a waste of page space. Great plot though.

      I do think some of the WoT books were weaker than others, but that's the way it goes with a 12 book series. There have definitely been huge "yes!" or "no!" moments in the last few books. The cleansing of the source was a huge moment for me.

      I do hope whoever "finishes" the book has more taste & talent than Herbert's kid and that other dude who "connected the dots" in Frank Herbert's notes.

    120. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by somersault · · Score: 1

      That is for the market to decide.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    121. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by MorePower · · Score: 1

      I'd say that's pretty much how all the King Arthur legends developed, and probably every other myth/legend/story from pre-copyright days.

    122. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But don't forget, he's wants to criminalize homosexuality. Not a gay thought in that man's head. No sirree!

    123. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Never ending? The first book was marketed as book 1 of a 9 part series. When Book 9 came and went without a resolution to the story, I knew someone was lying/milking things. I had assumed Jordan just got lazy/greedy and was taking longer than intended to finish it, not that he didn't intend to finish it.

    124. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by tbannist · · Score: 1

      Well you've got a point there, that was more than a little strange. I think the ending for Judas Unleashed is better.

      --
      Fanatically anti-fanatical
    125. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by Artifakt · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If all critical remarks should have been withheld until at least a week after his death, then where would they be expressed? This thread will be well over by then. Is Slashdot planning to start a new thread in a week or so? (And how could they announce it, if that itself might be taken as critical? "{Please hold all negative comments about Mr. Jordan for next week, when Slashdot will re-open the thread." Oooh! that sounds pretty critical, implying that not everyone has a high opinion of Robert Jordan's works!). So, we're in a thread where some people can post their opinion, free from any criticism, because criticism of each other's posts becomes criticism of the deceased? Handy for one side!
              And seriously, the attempt to stifle one poster you're referring to (by resorting to negative personal comments) was not just illogical, it was mean spirited, petty, and vindictive. For a moment, it made me personally think less of Mr. Jordan, that he was attracting the sort of fans who would stoop so low. You resorted to the same technique by labeling people hyperactive. Apparently, there is an ad hominem fallacy in your argument for decency, so excuse me if I don't just take your word that the previousl referenced post was free of them.
              That part of the thread where you joined in doesn't just concern Mr. Jordan, although I grant he's certainly central to it. By the time you posted, there was also a living person who was being insulted and abused. Your defense of this act shows you may think well of the dead, but have less respect for the living.
              Now I'm going to have to read at least one of the WoT series. To do otherwise would be to commit a logical fallacy myself and judge the man by the quality of his fans.

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
    126. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by erroneous · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, there's always fanfic.

      --
      erroneous: look me up in a dictionary
    127. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by mike2R · · Score: 1

      I really didn't find book 10 bad, when read in one go between books 9 and 11. Reading it the first time after a year and a half waiting wasn't so good, but for future readers of the Wheel of Time I don't think they're going to feel nearly as critical of some of the later books as those of us who have spent more than half our lives waiting for the next book.

      --
      This sig all sigs devours
    128. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by kniedzw · · Score: 1

      That said, Bujold's latest, The Sharing Knife, wasn't nearly as good as most of the rest of her stuff. I've not even read the second book, and I'm not sure I will.

    129. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by Surt · · Score: 1

      Yet another self-important SlashDot post in which the writer elevates himself to the position of critic. I'm afraid that even for a slashdotter, to become a critic is to lower yourself, not to elevate.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    130. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by jnik · · Score: 1

      I'd say that's pretty much how all the King Arthur legends developed, and probably every other myth/legend/story from pre-copyright days.
      And stories from the copyright days which have now reverted to the public domain. Little Mermaid, anyone? etc. etc. That's how legends grow, and that's why a perpetual copyright is a drag on creativity.

    131. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by Bob+Uhl · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That's a pretty rough criticism of a man who wrote a story that would humble Tolkien himself.

      Tolkien would be humbled by the Wheel of Time? Tolkien would be humbled by the Wheel of Time?!? Tolkien would be humbled by the Wheel of Time!?!?!?

      You have got to be kidding (or on some extremely high-quality intoxicants). If Tolkien had the patience to finish TWoT, humility wouldn't be the emotion he'd feel. Annoyance, probably. Disgust, possibly. Pity, very likely. Here's a comparison of the two writers:

      Tolkien
      • invented roughly two dozen different languages, with free borrowings from one another and a historical development of language and dialects over time
      • invented the history of a world on a grand scale from its very beginning
      • wrote some detailed stories covering very small periods within the above
      • finished each individual story
      • could write
      Jordan
      • wrote three or four good books
      • kept on putting huge amounts of words on paper ('writing' is hardly the term) long after his fans had decided he was insane and would never finish
      • never finished

      I too enjoyed the first several Jordan books. I was in grade school when they came out. I'm nearly thirty now.

      I will grant that Tolkien was actually humble despite his great talents and that Jordan was proud despite rather limited ones.

    132. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 1

      So the bar for literary criticism is that you must be more famous than the person you're talking about? Or maybe just more published? If the latter, then there is no one who can talk about Jordan, because 11 thousand-page books is hard to top.

      As another slashdotter who is not as published or as well known as Jordan, I feel nonetheless confident that in describing Jordan's work as over-wordy, slow-paced, and unfocused I am echoing the opinion of a great number of writers more accomplished than myself, and more accomplished than Jordan himself.

      How so many people struggled beyond the 6th book, I'll never know. The man needed an editor to bitch slap him to the point where he could resolve something without immediately turning around and creating something else needful of resolution.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    133. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by Aris+Katsaris · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I know you're not unique in your opinion -- however please hear me state the opposite side too. There's no author other than Tolkien that has given me sentences that stick to memory like some of the following: "These staves he spoke, yet he laughed as he said them. For once more lust of battle was on him; and he was still unscathed, and he was young, and he was king: the lord of a fell people." "Feanor was made the mightiest in all parts of body and mind, in valour, in endurance, in beauty, in understanding, in skill, in strength and in subtlety alike, of all the Children of Illuvatar, and a bright flame was in him." Passages like these combine extreme simplicity with extreme effectiveness. They stick to my memory. That must mean something concerning, even though his prose is not of such a kind that appeals to *you*. His prose may not flow easily to some readers -- and yet many other readers find that his words don't easily flow *away* from them.

    134. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by sasami · · Score: 1

      Jordan was writing an epic, there is a difference you know. ... They want to fully embrace complexity to show the unfolding of events that effect an entire world, you can only do that with a tapestry of characters and plotlines. If you don't like that kind of story, then just don't read it.

      Look at the context of the thread again. Jordan wasn't only writing an epic, he was also allegedly extending the series for financial reasons. (I've no idea how true that is, but I've no complaint if it is. Even writers gotta eat.) The suggestion was that there were many ways for him to write the extra books, especially since we do know that the Wheel of Time series was intended to be much shorter.

      Even so, I'd bet that shortening the tale would have improved the epic qualities of the series rather than diminished them. Such qualities do not derive from length but from size and scope. Writing something long and detailed may not necessarily result in anything epic, while even a short work, if it successfully situates itself within a greater milieu, may evoke that sense of awe that we're looking for in epic literature -- the sense, perhaps, of being rooted in something grand that transcends any individual.

      Let me illustrate, with a predictable example. Although I enjoyed WoT very much, I left at book 7 to await the remainder. For no particular reason, I decided to reread LoTR just then, and the contrast was a palpable shock: because Tolkien evokes an enormous history, I was immediately subjected to an epic scale. This was not the result of the story's length or detail -- it couldn't have been, because the epic scale was present from the very beginning.

      In other words, that epic background milieu can remain unstated, and often should. That's what background is for. It is not something you necessarily have to develop within the story, but something you start with. For instance, Tolkien will often allude to great swaths of "history" with nothing more than a casual remark -- as a craftsman, he has the option of accessing that richness just to infuse some particular scene with depth and texture and context, and then simultaneously get on with the story. To take a more serious example, it probably would've been impossible to compose The Odyssey if Homer had tried to include a comprehensive account of every relevant myth of the Greek pantheon.

      As much as I appreciate Robert Jordan's magnificent creativity, the GP's observation is shrewd. Jordan could have structured his opus to deliver all of the same detail in multiple, coherent series. That's not the only way he could've done it, but it probably would've been at least as successful as the way he did do it.

      And if the series is ever finished, may he rest in peace, I still plan to finish it as well.

      --
      Freedom is not the license to do what we like, it is the power to do what we ought.
    135. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by cylcyl · · Score: 1

      Indeed, the first few books of the WoT series was great!

      But by book 6, it was painfully obvious that Jordan was writing a retirement plan.
      imho, there should have been 7 books that focused on the main events of Rand and his cycle in the wheel of time (to correspond to the number of spokes in the wheel). The world was rich enough that it could have supported many spin offs that could have supported Jordan's career in perpetuity, but many readers (me included) just gave up on the series because it was just going no where.

      Despite that, my condolences to the Jordan family

    136. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by Jesterboy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I would much prefer George R. R. Martin, although he's still busy with A Dance with Dragons. He seems ideally capable; he also manages a large, sprawling fantasy series with many characters, and actually manages to have them do something. He does have some experience with "dragons", after all.

      Plus, he's not afraid to kill or maim any of the main characters, which would probably lead to a very happy end for some of Wheel of Time's more disenchanted readers such as myself. ^_^

      Although, to truly end the books in the way Jordan himself would, we need someone else who started a fantasy series incredibly, and then ran it into the ground with equal aplomb. Think Terry Goodkind will take the job?

      In all seriousness though, it's sad to see any artist pass away. He will be missed.

    137. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by Boronx · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's just me, but when my loved ones die, I avoid reading Slashdot articles about them. There is a place for ripping on the dead, and that place is here, apparantly.

    138. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by delinear · · Score: 1

      Of course, if you're looking to the internet for that comfort, one could argue you are already fighting a losing battle...

    139. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At the other end of good 'epic' writing is the Foundation Trilogy by Asimov. Its the complete opposite of Tolkien - Asimov tells the story of the galactic empire seen through shifting perspectives at critical turning points. The effect works. You see Seldon's vision unfold, and though the vignettes are character driven and you connect with the characters, at the end of each vignette you see the big picture take another step forward.

      The problem with the Foundation series is that Asimov took every other page to congratulate himself on such a clever idea, with every character taking a turn to recap and blurble endlessly about Seldon's magnificent vision, etc etc. He does similar things for the Laws of Robotics in I, Robot, but each short story is a little self-contained take on those laws from a different perspective each time, so it actually works. I haven't gotten around to reading the full novels in the Robot series, but I suspect he's going to do the same thing there, and it'll be a lot less enjoyable to read.

      For a guy who said he just liked to write "shaggy dog stories", he sure liked to pound his vision into our heads. Ah well, better than Heinlein's insufferable socio-political ranting through Lazarus Long or whatever other character is convenient. To say nothing of his other little peccadillos that showed up in his later books.

    140. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by Boronx · · Score: 1

      While you are probably right on all points, there really won't be much discussion of Robert Jordan after today, except once when book 12 comes out. This is a discussion site and a pretty crude one, not a commiseration site. Somewhere the guy should be discussed frankly and Slashdot is a good spot for it.

    141. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by chromatic · · Score: 1

      That series needs to be broken...

      Oh, it is. It is.

    142. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by Dread_ed · · Score: 1

      Dude, it was a JOKE!

      For those of us who loved the beginning of the series and were then put to sleep by Jordan's attempt at epic prose, it was a very funny joke.

      If you liked Jordan that is cool, you can defend him. But allow yourself a second of humor in light of the semi-conscious remembrance that all of us will one day go the way of Jordan.

      --
      When the only tool you have is a claw hammer every problem starts to look like the back of someone's skull.
    143. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Robert Jordan probably considers the afterlife a blessing, especially with fans like that.

    144. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I disagree. As tedious as it was to read, damn near every bit of it was essential. RJ managed to do something you rarely see in any fiction, let alone epic fantasy: he created a world with believable motivations, character psychology, and consequences. Perrin needed an army, Emond's Field wasn't exactly enough to bring to Tarmon Gaidon. With Faile's following, Perrin gets a believable army that didn't just appear around him. In fact, some of the nobles that Faile trapped while in captivity will almost certainly try to break away, and now they're going to have to fight for the army they've already gone through so much for. That's part of what I love about these books. Our heroes are fucked, just plain fucked beyond belief for nearly 10,000 pages, but he somehow keeps it tense and believable that they survive (when they do survive :( ) the whole time.

      I think he went beyond three books for money, but he went beyond 6-7 because he got in over his head and created a bigger story than he had any idea. The thing is, he stayed absolutely dedicated to not letting the book become the usual fantasy cliche of God's favors falling from the sky when the chips are down and managed to actually write a great story even if it was hard to read for a few books. Who knows how far he got through 12? He might have actually pulled the whole thing off. I wouldn't be shocked if 12's story is just as amazing, even if it does lose his personal touch some at the end. I hope to God he had the climax written down in advance.

      I wouldn't worry about spoilers. Nobody will remember this by the time they get through 10 books if they haven't read them already, and if they do I think they have enough un-spoiled story to work with.

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    145. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank God he's dead.

      I hope somewhere in a special corner of Hell he's doomed to endlessly tug his braids and stroke his skirt.

    146. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by dkdeath1 · · Score: 1

      I disagree that the difference in method of story telling necessarily makes it worse. I am one of the minority here that seems to have liked all the books, right through 11. Yes, some of the later books were slow paced. Yes, there were times when you wondered what had happened to the main characters. But for me what Jordan gave was not characterization or plot, but rather an entire world. I became lost and immersed in a world that felt almost as complete and full of history as our own. I felt less like I was reading 'the adventures of a unlikely being who can do anything' and more as if I was catching glimpses of their lives in between news stories from all over the world. Without the side stories of the Aiel or the Atha'an Miere, we would have a less full world with less understanding of the universe that he created. Paint me a thousand trees, Sketch me the outline of a forest, nay a world. Then let me fill it in with my own musing and imaginings. A good story in my opinion is one where you feel like you know the world well enough to wander into it on your own. That if you were dropped there yourself you could survive without worry. Robert Jordan was not the best writer I have encountered. But he is on the shelf where I keep all of my favorites that I will read time and again.

    147. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 2

      Read it. Even if they never publish another sentence it's the most amazing story you'll ever read. It's a Magnum Opus in every sense.

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    148. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by pjr.cc · · Score: 1

      It was sad to see him go, but as for the WoT (wheel of time or waste of time depending on who you listen to) im not sure i cared one way or another.

      I read from 1-10 as well and it went something like:
      1: wow, very interesting read, lots of interesting things happened?
      2: Quite good, the plot is developing nicely
      3: god i wish they'd stop pulling on those braids, but still not a bad ready
      4: im so sick of reading 4 paragraphs on how the grass was on the hill somewhere in the middle of nowhere that didnt matter
      5: How can he write so much and so little? the female/male balance really has gotten a little wierd
      6..7: he still manages to do something interesting in each book, but i feel like im reading 400 pages that should really have been cut down to 2 chapters
      8..9: i really cant remember much of significance happening here?
      10: ug, someone gave me their's and i feel i should read it. That was the last straw for me, 9 was bad, but 10 was a continuation of the same thing - complete waffle describing every single little insignificant detail in 15 pages with no impact on the plot.

      In short I think 12 books was waaaaaay too excessive. Jordan managed to stretch across 10 books what other authors put into 3-5, sometimes you could just flick 50 pages forward and literally not miss a thing. It was like reading "days of our lives" in that you could walk away for 2 years then watch one episode and be 100% caught up with everything that happened.

      The other thing that started to get me was that by about book 5 the characters had lost any endearing qualities. Whether that was because of the explicit detail he went into describing their actions and thoughts or because they appeared to all fall victim to their various neuroses im not sure.

    149. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by Sobrique · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I felt badly ripped off by those endings. Deus Ex Machina went out of fashion in ancient greece, because even at that point, they realised it was lame.

      I mean, seriously. Endings may be tough, but ... hell even 'rocks fall, everyone dies' would have been a better finale than ... well, what we got.

      Thankfully, Pandora's Star/Judas Unchained, he's maybe learned his lesson. There is an ending. It's ... well, not _great_ but eminently credible, with some basis all the way through. I still don't know quite why he sent someone off wandering pathways, for no discernible reason, but ... well, most of the story is fairly solid. His 'concept' of a believable fantasy world is just superb. I really loved the whole nanonics/affinity stuff, and thought it was really superb. But ... yeah. I could rant all day. I won't. But it's just as well he did actually end gracefully, as I might have had to go and violence his boats otherwise.

    150. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by Boronx · · Score: 3, Informative

      I used to feel the same way till I found out that his poetry (and his prose) was an immitation of ancient styles. From that perspective, it's all very well written.

      The Lord of the Rings is a book I can reread every decade and it grows on me each time, I learn knew words, passages that I skimmed over or thought were boring become my favorites, old characters I thought I knew appear in a different light, some subtlties take on new meaning for me, I come to enjoy this poem or that.

      I believe now that the Lord of the Rings is a truly incredible feat of literature. Despite many surface similarities, it is wholy different than any other fantasy I have read, almost none of which could be called great literature.

    151. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by metlin · · Score: 1

      As a fan of both Pratchett and Miles, I will add one more to the list - L.E. Modesitt, Jr.

      Except for a few boring series, his books in the Recluce saga can be read as stand-alone books (for the most part) or in order.

      Of course, it is not fair to compare him to Pratchett, but Modesitt, Jr.'s books are good in their own way.

    152. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 1

      I really don't see how anyone can say they start to go downhill before 7. The Fires of Heaven is filled with some of the most important events in the entire series (the doorway on the wagon still gets me choked up) and both 5 and 6 are the real final turning point for Rand's personality. And Dumai's Wells... I don't see how anyone could say the buildup to that and especially the chapter itself is anything short of amazing.

      Perrin and Faile, however, make me want to gas myself. It's like watching a friend get whipped by a bad girlfriend, except instead of disappearing like usual they're always around.

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    153. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by yada21 · · Score: 1

      The thing about the Xanth books is, Ive read maybe three. You can read them in pretty much any order and they make no more or no less sense - but youll have a good laugh anyways.

      --
      I will have a sig when the market demands it.
    154. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I vowed I wouldn't read anything else until he was done with it."

        Heard a good audio book lately?

    155. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by vondo · · Score: 1

      Any of his WOT stuff, obviously.

    156. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 1

      Read the first two, at least.

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    157. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by Kelson · · Score: 1

      I think the series shows this, as it starts running out of steam around book 3 or 4, and limps along through book 11 and a prequel.

      Actually, I'd say it's at book 6 where it starts slowing down. The way I see it, books 1-5 are novels. (And #4 is probably my favorite of the series.) Books 6 and onward are one really long novel split into 1000-page chunks.

      I'd gotten tired of the books a couple of years ago, but I let myself get talked into reading the prequel, and enjoyed it much more than I had the last few books in the main series. Then book 11 came along and he started actually resolving plotlines. It was something of a shock. After that, I was really looking forward to the finale.

    158. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by Nimey · · Score: 1

      At least Terry Goodkind finally realized he should close out the main series so he wouldn't become like Jordan... Too late. I don't know if you've read his latest effort, but don't. That one I /did/ throw against a wall, which even book 10 of WoT couldn't drive me to. I finally got tired of Richard spouting off; it was almost like the Speech in _Atlas Shrugged_, but spread out here and there. No plot for dozens of pages, just dialog.

      I say that as a big fan of the first four or five books in the SoT series, to the point that I was regularly staying up until 2am reading.
      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    159. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 1

      Haha, I've read other people trying not to post spoilers but been somewhat callous about it myself, given that even if you spoil one or two things it's no big deal... but man you freaking nailed it. Hah!

      Agreed on the Herbert thing. Man he took Dune and turned it into one big pile of shit... and the stuff he said about the Jews, omg.

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    160. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was, until I assfucked it into Goatse!

    161. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by Ristol · · Score: 1

      I thought so as well at various places in the last book, particularly when everything suddenly came together for Mat Cauthon. They had a quest, they had everything that they needed, and they were MAD! And then the next scene involving them was them camping out again with hardly any mention of it. Frustrating.

      --
      What wouldn't Jesus do?!
    162. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by Schlage · · Score: 1

      Some of us simply support respect, whether for the living or the dead. My personal experience has been that those who do not care to respect the dead do not respect the living either and, quite often, are beings generally deficient of respect.

      Respecting the dead is both about honoring the memory of the person gone and about respecting the feelings of those still living who more personally feel the weight of those who have passed.

      It's really about honor and respect in general... something more easily understood the more fully it's part of one's character, I suppose.

    163. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by COMON$ · · Score: 1

      I was waiting for the series to finish before starting it but would T. Goodkind be able to finish the series? Are their writing styles similar? I was assuming so since Goodkind has been dragging on his storyline in a similar fashion to what my Jordan fan friends have been complaining about.

      --
      CS: It is all sink or swim...oh and did I mention there are sharks in that water?
    164. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by Von+Rex · · Score: 1

      I stopped at one.

      Glad I did.

    165. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by vux984 · · Score: 1

      The problem with the Foundation series is that Asimov took every other page to congratulate himself on such a clever idea, with every character taking a turn to recap and blurble endlessly about Seldon's magnificent vision, etc etc.

      Hmmm. In the first novel, yeah, and that was sort a propos, so it didn't grate on me. They avert a crises and a voice from the past congratulates them. Something like that would become almost a religious sense of destiny and entitlement - something that became very real as the series goes on. Its not surprising that the "chosen ones" would act like that.

      Later on, when the nature the 2nd foundation is revealed. And they discover Seldon's magnificant vision was for them to be pawns; suddenly it wasn't so magnificent... and they reject it entirely. (At least from the foundation's point of view.)

      I haven't gotten around to reading the full novels in the Robot series, but I suspect he's going to do the same thing there, and it'll be a lot less enjoyable to read.

      Hmmm. I didn't get that so much out of the Robot stuff. And as for the novels, he ends up determining that the 3 laws of robotics aren't sufficient; I'll leave it at that.

      As for your comment on Heinlein. Amen.

    166. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by COMON$ · · Score: 1

      that is a big AMEN! I even ranted on the website about it when I "threw the book" at around 2:00am one morning. Given he is an objectivist, I mentioned the exact same thing on the site, the speeches are largely a waste of time and are not continuous with the rest of the storyline. I don't mind the philosophy discussed here and there but dozens of pages? I have been reading the books for long enough that I move into super skim mode when I foresee the rant coming, saves me a good 2 hours of reading time :)

      --
      CS: It is all sink or swim...oh and did I mention there are sharks in that water?
    167. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Coincidentally, does anyone want to proof-read my upcoming Perry Rhodan novel? In this novel, Perry is turned into a woman, only to discover that he is actually the angel of deli food and he has to travel back in time to 1781 to save the world from the NASA, who also turned back in time to make everyone eat astronaut food so they forget about deli food.

      The novel after that will be a Perry Rhodan/Gor/anthro veggies crossover which explores the BDSM relationship between Perry, a carrot and a family of rhubarbs.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    168. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by t_ban · · Score: 1

      Tolkien's world is famous because of its immense depth and detail. Lord of the Rings is good writing because while you get a sense of all the depth and detail, its history, and its complexity. Very little of it is actually in the book; you know its there because you can see its 'edges'; but Tolkien didn't try to tell EVERYBODY'S story. He knew better.

      Erich Auerbach, one of the most respected critics of literature in the 20th century, talks about this difference in his book Mimesis. There is the Homeric style of writing, in which the author pursues every narrative strand to its utmost, and leaves nothing in the background. And then there is the Hebraic style of writing, best exemplified in the Old Testament, which works through hints and suggestions, and whose very reticence creates a sense of depth of the world being described.

      See

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erich_Auerbach#Mimesis:_The_Representation_of_Reality_in_Western_Literature for more detailed discussion.

      So what you're saying is Jordan uses the Homeric style, while Tolkien was more Hebraic. I don't completely agree with that, but even if it were wholly true, neither style is inferior to the other, just different. Or rather, they are both good in different ways. For what it's worth, let me add here that I consider the first half dozen books in the WoT series to be at least as good as the LOTR trilogy.

      --
      First they ignore you. Then they laugh at you. Then they fight you. Then you win. -Gandhi
    169. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      Oh, I almost forgot to mention it: There is a book like you describe for sale and for free download, actually. Atlanta Nights is truly a unique work of literature and everyone should or shouldn't have read it.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    170. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      "Admitting that you could never accomplish even a tenth of what Robert Jordan accomplished and then asserting that you have a right to criticize his works rings sort of hollow doesn't it?"

      Nope.

      "So why should I listen to a disgruntled fanboy over published authors?"

      He writes a book and some of his target audience doesn't like it, and you're asking why you should hear what they have to say? That's somehow NOT hollow?

      "And what do you think those published authors would be saying about your criticism?"

      I doubt they would say much since I haven't made any criticism of the author. All I said was I don't care for the "he was successful, therefore you should like it" mentality. George Lucas was successful with Star Wars, that doesn't evaporate away my rights to criticize the prequels.

      Since books, movies, tv shows, video games, etc. are intended to entertain a general audience, nobody needs a published book to criticize the products they're being asked to pay for. Personally, I'd rather hear from somebody who's read the books and had only a mild opinion of them than some pretentious asshole using his appreciation of said books to boost his ambient intelligence. That goes for published authors or even over-zealous fan-bois that take personal offense to criticism and use worthless arguments like "The guy's successful and you're not!"

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    171. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by qweqwe321 · · Score: 1
      His legacy is fucked now.

      Is George Lucas' legacy shot because of Episodes I-III?

    172. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by Prien715 · · Score: 1

      I think the general argument is valid, but we're judging movies/books/Miss Missouri not as an writer, but as a reader.

      As a reader, I can most definitely say he was overly tedious -- but I shouldn't be able to make that argument if I hadn't read but his books.

      --
      -- Political fascism requires a Fuhrer.
    173. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rule #2: skip the stuff with Tom Bombadil -- his dancing and singing all over the place make me want to hand him over to a ring wraith ...

    174. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      "I learn knew words..."

      Time to learn their homonyms, too.

    175. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by darth_abaddon · · Score: 1

      >George Lucas' legacy shot because of Episodes I-III
      I fixed your comment

    176. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      First three books are great. The rest fail to capture most people's interest. You can read through books 5-9 and not really care at all about the characters or what happens, you're just going through the motions because you dropped $8-15 on the book. If you pick up the later books at the library you won't finish them, not because they are bad, but simply because they are not nearly as good as the first three.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    177. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by Endo13 · · Score: 1

      ...but that's just my opinion Maybe, but I have a feeling that most of us who have read both Martin and Jordan share that opinion. Another author whose writing style I've really enjoyed is Robin Hobb.
      --
      There is no -1 Disagree mod. Slashdot.org/faq defines mod options. USE IT.
    178. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's basically how we got every epic poem we know today. Tell me what's wrong with it again?

    179. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by nuzak · · Score: 1

      Isn't all fiction speculative?

      --
      Done with slashdot, done with nerds, getting a life.
    180. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by johnmcboston · · Score: 1

      Just finished it and enjoyed it (Phantom). Although between the extended violence descriptions and the 'what do we do' speeches, it did sound a bit like a filler between books 9 and 11. Probably could have trimmed 1-2 hundred pages and not lost much, but I did plow through it. Just annoyed it'll be 1.5 years before the last volume comes out in paperback.

    181. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by AuMatar · · Score: 1

      If Terry Goodkind took the job, Rand's last name would be changed to Ayn, and Saetan would become evil not for wanting to destroy the world, but for not paying fair market price for it first.

      Seriously- Goodkind started out good. Book 2 was derivative, but decent. Book 3 and 4 were ok. Then you really ought to skip everything before chainfire- they don't move the plot, they don't make any sense, and if I wanted to read bad objectivist fiction- well, realisticly I'd rather kill myself.

      Martin is great, but he's falling into the Jordan trap. Books are taking longer and longer, and we don't have any idea what the end game is. Any idea, other than a political clusterfuck, is the plot of Song of Fire and Ice? There's hints at a deeper story, but nothing solid yet. Enjoyable in its own right, but I put the two of them in the same category.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    182. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by nuzak · · Score: 1

      > Any idea, other than a political clusterfuck, is the plot of Song of Fire and Ice?

      If it wasn't obvious to you by the end of the third book, you're as dense as neutronium. I've already forgotten the names of all the characters, but I can still remember it's going to be a three-way conflict between the mongol horde led by the dragon chick in the east (that's the fire), the eskimo monster army from the north led by the bastard Stark dude (the ice), and what's left of the seven (or is it nine?) kingdoms caught in the middle, "led" more or less by the machievellian dwarf and whatserface stark. With a zombie undead Stark or two thrown in for color.

      Martin isn't going to leave you hanging forever, because there isn't going to be anyone left alive soon.

      I haven't read book four yet. I've been told I may as well wait til book 5 and read them together.

      --
      Done with slashdot, done with nerds, getting a life.
    183. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 1

      I don't think any authour writes a book linearly. You write the best parts and the climaxes, then you go back and flesh out the rest of the book so you can get to those bits. You'll see the pattern in any chapter book once you start looking.

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    184. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You, sir, are an Ass. And a Very Pompous one at that. This is an online discussion forum, where "disrespectful" posts such as the one posted by the OP are the nice side of things. What this is not is a funeral home. The close friends and family of the deceased are not here. Even if they visited this site on occasion, it's a bet with odds better than one billion to one that they are not here now. They're off doing what any decent respectful family and friends should be doing: respecting the deceased. This website is precisely the place for such a discussion, and it is in no way disrespectful to the author.

      And yes, I'm an avid reader who happens to have read all the Jordan books 1-11 (including the prequel) and enjoyed every one of them - despite the fact that his writing clearly lacks polish, and is by far not the best authoring I've read.

      And this is anonymous solely because I don't want to be notified of any long pompous diatribe you choose to respond with.

      That is all.

      --

      Endo13

    185. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 1

      Nope, Deus Ex Machina is still used - they're just better at hiding it.

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    186. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by AuMatar · · Score: 1

      Except book 4 doesn't move twoards that at all. Sure, I know some of the things that are coming. Jon Stark isn't really Ned's bastard, he's his sister's son by rape. This makes him one of the House of Dragon, so he and Daneyers will end up together since they like to keep it in the family. But he's hit book 4 and hasn't even begun to start that storyline. So yes, he's fallen into Jordanville. A more well written story than Jordan circa book 10, but same problem.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    187. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by Brownstar · · Score: 1

      If you enjoy that style of writing, read Lord Dunsany's "The King of Elflands Daughter". Which is the source of the style that Tolkien tried copying.

    188. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by shaitand · · Score: 1

      lets look at that a little closer.

      Tolkien

                      * invented roughly two dozen different languages, with free borrowings from one another and a historical development of language and dialects over time

      This was a waste of time, the languages added absolutely nothing to the story. They were there just to be there.

                      * invented the history of a world on a grand scale from its very beginning

      A scale that pales in comparison to that which Jordan created. It lacks the depth and the detail. Tolkien wrapped you up in the wonder of the story but Jordan created a world you could believe. I never had any particular attachment with any character in Tolkien's world because he never really developed a character in a way you could relate to or understand.

                      * wrote some detailed stories covering very small periods within the above

      Tolkien skipped huge swaths of the story, instead letting entire adventures go with a few words of summary.

                      * finished each individual story

      True, The wheel of time is really one book. A very long, intricate and delicate masterpiece that Tolkien couldn't have managed in his wildest dreams.

                      * could write

      Yes, not nearly so well as dozens of fantasy authors who have followed, including Jordan but he could write. Lord of the Rings is a great tale but what sets it apart is that at the time it was an innovative story that took fantasy to a new level. The actual story itself is among the greats but not the best of them and not alone in that class.

    189. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by Endo13 · · Score: 1
      You're wrong. I very much doubt you've ever read any of Tolkien's works besides The Hobbit and LotR. If you have, well then clearly his books simply were not for you. I've read every single one of Jordan's books I've found (Yes, even the WoT prequel and the Conan Chronicles) and while he's got a very intriguing fantasy world and a great story, his writing is very lack-luster and his fantasy world is barely a drop in a bucket compared to Tolkien's. Even Raymond Feist's fantasy world is much grander than Jordan's, and it still pales in comparison to Tolkien's creation.

      This was a waste of time, the languages added absolutely nothing to the story. They were there just to be there. And that line very succinctly shows how wrong you are.
      --
      There is no -1 Disagree mod. Slashdot.org/faq defines mod options. USE IT.
    190. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by Minwee · · Score: 1

      I know that James Rigney is a successful author whose books have been read by millions and enjoyed by many. I know that "jesdynf" is someone who would really like some quality time alone with the straw man, so I think I'll just give you some privacy now.

    191. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by shaitand · · Score: 1

      'Tolkien's world is famous because of its immense depth and detail. Lord of the Rings is good writing because while you get a sense of all the depth and detail, its history, and its complexity.'

      Sorry but Tolkien wasn't the greatest story teller, he was an innovator and the Lord of the Rings was great for being an innovation. The actual story itself compares well to other fantasy works and remains among the greats but is hardly the best. The complexity and detail you speak of do not compare with what Robert Jordan painted.

      Only someone who has read the WoT a few times can truely understand and appreciate the story. Jordan doesn't just paint a complex and intricate picture of the world, he paints a CONSISTENT complex and intricate picture of the world. When Min is first introduced and it mentions a few examples of images she saw off hand, those images foretold minor events that unfolded in 'side stories' as much as 10 books and thousands of pages later.

      The first misunderstanding that people have is thinking the Wheel of Time is a series, its not. The WoT is really one book that has been released in segments. The second is that its enough to just read through it, you couldn't possibly grasp the story with one quick read through. The Wheel of Time is not a story written for a casual reader and will not be easily digested by that crowd.

      'What is the Wheel of Time about exactly? Its not really about anything because its about everything. And its not about everything because its spends to much time focused on the minutia of individuals. It tries to paint a forest by telling you the story of every tree. And in the end you have neither a good sense of the forest, nor any decent connection to any particular trees.'

      That simply isn't true. The Wheel of Time is telling a very specific story and it only paints the trees that are of some significance in that story. There are dozens of major and semi major characters but there isn't one who is fleshed out significantly for no reason at all, all of them play a part in the bigger picture.

      'And in the end you have neither a good sense of the forest, nor any decent connection to any particular trees.'

      If you give the story the attention it deserves you will have an excellent knowledge of the forest that couldn't be attained any other way and you have a deep connection to the individual trees. Not only that, but you know the job was done correctly because your connection with given trees is proportionate to their importance. You understand how characters think and could predict their actions in a given situation in the same manner you could predict those of a close friend. Not only that, but you care about the characters. Your heart stops when the source is cleaned, throughout the tail you mentally grasp, cry, laugh, and get excited in the suspense.

      Seriously, I might understand with random people but I have trouble believing there is someone with technical skill who doesn't appreciate the need for a detailed understanding of the component pieces and their interaction to TRULY appreciate the big picture.

      I'll save you some trouble, if you are the type who wants to read through a book and then toss it on a shelf to gather dust the Wheel of Time isn't for you. If you want that kind of passive entertainment you are better off just watching a movie. You have to work for it to appreciate the WoT but once you do, you will find a masterpiece that is second to none.

    192. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by jesdynf · · Score: 1

      What is it with you and the straw men? Set them up and knock them down; clearly your message was so overwhelming it was all he could do to bluster out a reply and cry about his failures as a human being. Come on here. I believe what I'm saying and not just making things up to sound good, have the courtesy to do the same. Although he's right and it does reflect poorly on you, nobody's really going to care -- unless, of course, you take the time to call him out on it, and ponderously mouth about how "sad" it is. I had to unlock my filter just to see what the big deal was.

      --
      Yahoo! Pipes are awesome. How awesome? http://pipes.yahoo.com/jesdynf/slashdot
    193. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by SonicTheDeadFrog · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think your perception on where the WoT series moved during the fourth book is a little misinformed. The pacing of the series was based on the premise that it might only make it for three volumes, but if it remained popular it would be expanded to twelve. If the last nine were never made, the first three would need to stand on their own somewhat. In other words, what you're interpreting as a breakdown was really part of the plan from the beginning. I suppose that probably did have a lot to do with pressure from TOR, but if Jordan's own words could be believed, the more involved (and therefore lengthy) style was his style of choice.

      Personally, I am one of those people who criticized this from the sidelines for years, reading bits and pieces and making high-handed declarations about how it was "just another fantasy series" unremarkable, and needlessly wordy. But most of that changed about three years ago when I actually sat down to give it a fair evaluation. People who think this is unnecessarily long would probably say the same thing about Tolkien, and I just can't agree with them. None of the description is superfluous. Jordan doesn't write filler to beef up his page count, his stories are simply that involved and complex, and reading them is a very rewarding experience. This series, finished or not, will always find a place of honor on my bookshelves.

      As far as Card goes, I'm 100% in agreement with you. I can't tell where Card went wrong, however - whether his early writing was from the heart and took a downturn when he tried to be a crowd pleaser later on, or whether his best work was done when he was trying to be a crowd pleaser and his work deteriorates when he's left to his own devices (like the Wachowski Brothers).

      At any rate, I know that Card was a fan of Jordan's work, and though I don't care much for Card's more recent work, I wouldn't expect he would ghostwrite in his own style, or embellish from his own imagination. He would probably handle the story with the utmost respect and care, and although fans would swear blind that they could tell the difference, Jordan himself probably couldn't were he alive.

    194. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by hde226868 · · Score: 1

      It is a trilogy, not a duology, and the first volume (The Dreaming Void) came out in the UK in August in hardcover. I just finished reading it (bought it in Stansted airport on Wednesday) and it is well worth reading.

    195. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by moogleii · · Score: 1

      aha, no. Not IMO anyway. I don't even really like Tolkien that much, but WoT was barely passable reading material. I'm surprised I got past book 3.

    196. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1

      Is Slashdot planning to start a new thread in a week or so?

      "Planning" might be too strong a word, but like death and taxes, the probability is quite high.

    197. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by sgtrock · · Score: 1

      Add David Eddings to the list of authors who got this right. He notes in a foreword of the republished _The_Belgariad_ that he ended up writing a 12 volume cycle. He references a couple of classics from the ancient world who did the same thing (their names escape me at the moment, however). Anyhow, The Belgariad is 5 novels, The Mallorean is another 5, Belgarath the Sorceror is a prequel, and Polgara the Sorceress is the follow up prequel that ties right back to The Belgariad. Eddings said he ended up writing the book equivalent of dope, and he's had people hooked for 20 years. :)

    198. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by rebelcan · · Score: 1

      I prefer the Mat or Perrin storylines ( not always in that order, though ) over the angsty "oh em gee. I'm going to die and I might take the world with me! Oh sob sob sob" Rand storylines. Good grief man.

      --
      God is dead -- Nietzsche
      Nietzsche is dead -- God
      Zombie Nietzsche lives! -- Zombie Nietzsche
    199. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by jesdynf · · Score: 1

      Actually, *I* know that his books have been read by millions and enjoyed by many. This would be the problem. It would be much more impressive had his books been read by millions and enjoyed by millions, possibly including someone who'd give him some kind of literary award.

      I'm looking here, counting 12 books over 17 years, and I can't seem to find even a nomination. Now, lack of an award doesn't even correlate with lack of writing ability, so don't waste my time with counter-examples, and it's easily possible I missed what five-minutes-ago-when-I-found-it became the most Important Novel Award Ever... but it'd be a lot easier to soundly squelch criticism of those damn potboilers if somebody in the industry had decided to recognize him as someone besides "someone who sold a bunch of very thick books".

      Wait, no, I take it back, I did find one -- on the final check before posting (because who likes to be wrong?), I learned he was nominated for the 2008 Colorado Blue Spruce Young Adult award. Well, I'll have to give him that one.

      --
      Yahoo! Pipes are awesome. How awesome? http://pipes.yahoo.com/jesdynf/slashdot
    200. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by canajin56 · · Score: 1

      The real question is, did George Lucas' legacy shoot first?

      --
      ASCII stupid question, get a stupid ANSI
    201. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by justin12345 · · Score: 1

      I have the series on Book on Tape. For some reason when they are being read to me, I don't find 8-10 tedious at all. You might try it if you gonna make another run through. I'm actually listening to Book 5 now, and man it's good (I love Asmodean).

      --
      Cool art gallery, if you're into that sort of thing.
    202. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by vux984 · · Score: 1

      Sorry but Tolkien wasn't the greatest story teller

      I never said he was. I merely said lord of the rings was good writing.

      Only someone who has read the WoT a few times can truely understand and appreciate the story.

      The same can be said about any story. I wonder if its a sign of better writing if the reader can understand it the first time through.

      Jordan doesn't just paint a complex and intricate picture of the world, he paints a CONSISTENT complex and intricate picture of the world. When Min is first introduced and it mentions a few examples of images she saw off hand, those images foretold minor events that unfolded in 'side stories' as much as 10 books and thousands of pages later.

      You can find examples of foreshadowing like that in most any good writing where the author has notes on the back story before writing the novels.

      As for consistency, yeah, I'll give him that. But that doesn't make it good.

      That simply isn't true. The Wheel of Time is telling a very specific story and it only paints the trees that are of some significance in that story.

      Its telling a very specific story? Well then, I reiterate... "what is that 'very specific story'"?

      There are dozens of major and semi major characters but there isn't one who is fleshed out significantly for no reason at all, all of them play a part in the bigger picture.

      "Dozens of major and semi major characters" doesn't make for a good story. Its true that most things are in actual fact the result of dozens of major and semi major characters -- like World War II, or the development of the nuclear bomb, or the story of cyptography (which themselves could both be subplots to World War II -- or vice versa), but a good story doesn't tell all their stories.

      If you want to get a good sense of world war ii in its entirety there is no single novelization that tells it all. Nor could their be. If you want to know everything about world war ii, the way to go about it is to read multiple stories.

      Jordon tries to cover a similiarly complex story, in its entirety, in one novel. And its as ineffective as trying to read a novel that contains everything from the rise of communism in russia, the Truman election, the fall of Imperial Japan, Patton's battles in Africa, Women's baseball in America, the story of the German National Socialism party and its perversion into the fascism of the Nazis, to the Canadian's on Juno Beach in the battle of Normandy, to the story of the Niland Brothers (upon which saving private ryan is apparently loosely based) to Oskar Schindler...

      That Jordon was 'consistent' may be quite the feat, and indeed our understanding of our own World War II is far less complete and consistent. Regardless; mere consistency doesn't make the story good.

    203. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ridiculous. So, since I'm not a gourmet chef, I have no right to complain when a meal I ordered is horrible? Or since I'm not a musician, I can't complain about music that makes my ears bleed? I suppose when my new house collapses, I can't criticize the architect or builder...

      No, in most cases a layperson can quite easily see that a finished product is of poor quality. It may, however, take an expert to determine exactly how and why the craftsman went wrong.

    204. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by Darby · · Score: 1

      As a fan of both Pratchett and Miles, I will add one more to the list - L.E. Modesitt, Jr.

      Except for a few boring series, his books in the Recluce saga can be read as stand-alone books (for the most part) or in order.


      Totally. The author recommends reading them in the order published which is different than the temporal order. Doing it that way you often get to see some great civilization destroyed before you read about it being built.

      Can you guess which ones are my favorite ;-)

    205. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by itlurksbeneath · · Score: 1

      You must be a big fan of the Thieves World books by Asprin, et al. No vendor lock-in to a single author there. :)

      --
      Have you ever considered piracy? You'd make a wonderful Dread Pirate Roberts.
    206. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by Dread_ed · · Score: 1

      So you are trying to say that you have never thought of a joke at someone else's expense, nor laughed at one?

      Sorry, but as a former innocent who had little malice and even less guile, I find that impossible to believe.

      And, in this case, respect is given by simply understanding the man and his works enough to make a "roast" style joke about him. If he were living and someone said it to him he would probably laugh.

      As for myself, if anyone wants to make jokes about me after I am dead, please do. I only require that you do it well. That someone would even utter my name after I am gone is respect enough for me, much less if the thought of me can provide entertainment for those still living.

      --
      When the only tool you have is a claw hammer every problem starts to look like the back of someone's skull.
    207. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by aevans · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but that was quite a bit more of an accomplishment. Ruining one of the strongest reputations in film based on 3 blockbusters (no one complained about Return of the Jedi) with only an equal number of flops.

    208. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by aevans · · Score: 1

      Sounds like you don't respect the living.

    209. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No possible way does the author of "Flash" belong on any reliable-gets-it-right-often list. Ugh, such dreck.

    210. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, it went pretty much like this:

      1) Good book, derivative in plot, but with interesting characters and a lot of detail.
      2-3) See book #1.
      4) Plot shift, elaboration on the secondary major characters, and some new work. Probably better than book 1.
      5) The most interesting character and the strength of book 4 does not appear. Otherwise, is a copy of book 4.
      6-11) Wishes they sucked less than book 5. Proves Moiraine was the only interesting AS.

    211. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by justin12345 · · Score: 1

      Given what everyone is saying in this thread my opinion doesn't seem very popular, but I would say that the first book is by far the weakest of the series. I really feel that Jordan hadn't really found the stories 'voice' yet and only does so in the following book. The books 2, 3, are undeniably great though after that the story turns from being about kids on an adventure to young men and women waging war and consolidating power. The story arcs get much much more complicated and dwell on politics, rather then survival. Personally I love the later books and I've gone through them all about 3-4 times (usually on tape). There are definitely areas where the story could be shortened (Perrin I'm looking at you) and told more succinctly, but I wouldn't call it filler as some here do. If you don't like long descriptions of nearly everything, you won't like Jordan's writing and its best to avoid any but maybe the earlier books.

      --
      Cool art gallery, if you're into that sort of thing.
    212. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by aevans · · Score: 1

      Why? I am able to make that argument based only on having seen the original book on display at the book store. Whether I have a right to or not is immaterial since it turned out that my snap judgement was right.

    213. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by theMerovingian · · Score: 1


      For every offensive comment in this thread, there are thousands of fans out there who have nothing but best wishes and support for RJ's friends and family. I never got to meet him in person, but those books have been a meaningful part of my life since middle school (almost 30 now).

      --
      "If you think you have things under control, you're not going fast enough." --Mario Andretti
    214. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jordan tried to write an epic, and succeeded in describing a very long, very boring argument.

    215. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by pionzypher · · Score: 1

      MutualDisdain,

      I haven't posted prior to this. So hopefully you'll take this as it's intended- a neutral third parties opinion. It's obvious that you have respect to RJ, and I can appreciate that you're defending him. But with all the replies you are coming off a bit.... frenetic.

      It's laudable to defend, but realize that you probably won't change peoples opinions. They are still going to say what they want, and the off color jokes are most definitely not going to be limited to slashdot.

      --
      I'll believe in corporations having personhood when Texas executes one... - advocate_one
    216. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by Chaos+Incarnate · · Score: 1

      No, their writing styles aren't at all similar. More, I would argue that any dragging Goodkind did was of a completely different form. While Goodkind's metaplot didn't necessarily advance in any give book, at least he managed to wrap up the plot of that individual book. Jordan... not so much.

      --
      Benford's Corollary to Clarke's Law: "Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced."
    217. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed.

      Tolkien is an _excellent_ worldbuilder. Probably the best in the genre. But his actual prose is horribly dry and boring. To this day, I never finished Return of the King, because it bored me so much (and I started reading the Hobbit and LOTR in 1999!).

    218. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by ed1park · · Score: 1

      Thank you.

    219. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by Aris+Katsaris · · Score: 1

      I've read Dunsany already - but I didn't like him. Perhaps the problem was the translation (I only read a Greek translation of Dunsany, while I've read Tolkien in both English and in Greek) -- but either way it was the imagery and words of Tolkien that stuck to mind, and Dunsany's not. From what I remember of what I thought of Dunsany was that he was too abstract and unorganized for my tastes. Tolkien was about the specifics; the specifics that mattered.

    220. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by DarrenBaker · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hey, dammit! I've only read up to page 193 of Book 9! Thanks for spoiling page 194 for me.

      Please, people, consider the spoiler content of your posts!

    221. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by ushering05401 · · Score: 1

      The collection "Tales Before Tolkien" contains a number of earlier stories that influenced him. These are not the ancient patterns that he drew from, but more contemporary. Most of the stories are hard to read due to their strange styles, but once you have read them you recognize many common threads that run through the trilogy.

      Tolkien was a true student of literature.

      Anyhow, it is worth checking out if you are into the history of Tolkien's style.

    222. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by schunn99 · · Score: 1

      hey all, look here for those wondering about if they are going to finish book 12: this is a quote from robert jordan's blog this was posted by wilson a relative of jordan's on 9/9, a week before he passed. "Epilog: Yes he is continuing to work through all of this medical calamity. MOL is going into the word processor and onto audio tapes almost daily. Not every day mind you, because the medical fight takes first priority. But, he told you he'd finish and he will. Fact is that it has been finished in his head for years. During a recent family sit around, he became the Gleeman and told the bones of it ALL to Harriet and me. You read that right, I did say ALL. Don't ask, ain't telling. Two and a half hours of story telling by the Creator himself went by in the twinkling of an eye. Truly magical. All I can say is WOW! Best stuff he's ever done. MOL is going to knock your socks off! That's a promise." source dragonmount.com

    223. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by WobindWonderdog · · Score: 1

      Hehe, I love Modesitt's books, Recluce, mind you, not that horrible Soprano Sorceress series =\ However, they're all fairly much predictable in their execution, which is not to say they aren't eminently readable, since although the plot points are all the same, the journey to them is different. And for some reason, they're completely re-readable, which is fantastic. One thing I admire is his separation of universes in his different series, with authors like Eddings, their characters/situations tend to be identical across the different series, but with Modesitt, it's completely separate. His Tangible Ghosts series is a fascinating exercise in alternate history, and I love his single protagonist scifi books (the multiprotagonist ones I can't quite get into). As for Pterry, what more need be said? He has a grasp of the absurdity of reality few have, and can express it in ways that us norms can comprehend.

    224. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by ekhben · · Score: 1

      I don't need a driver's license to fairly and accurately judge that the guy who spends more time on the footpath than the road is not a good driver.

    225. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by sigh71 · · Score: 1

      Yup, its going to be a trilogy, book 1 is out now. It's called "The Dreaming Void".
      Set 1500 years after the fall of the Starflyer, I'm about 3/4 through and really enjoying it.

      http://www.peterfhamilton.co.uk//index.php?page=commonwealth

    226. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by ShakaUVM · · Score: 1

      I liked how the Night's Fall series ended, really... "Deus Ex Machina" is actually printed on the back cover, and it's not like it hasn't been set up (slowly) over the course of the series. The main problem with Deus Ex Machina endings is that they're sudden. Frodo and his manservant are sitting there on the side of a volcano, waiting to die, all hope gone, when Gandalf suddenly appears without any setup, and everything is magically all right. When you actively go hunting down a god to help you out, IMO, it's a different paradigm at work.

    227. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by WNight · · Score: 1

      What does it have to do with chapters?

    228. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by Motley+Phule · · Score: 1

      You know, I liked 1 - 3 and I read a few more but then completely lost count of which one I was up to. Since most of them are substantially the same, I never bothered to try to work out exactly how many I had read.

    229. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by olman · · Score: 1

      Thankfully, Pandora's Star/Judas Unchained, he's maybe learned his lesson. There is an ending. It's ... well, not _great_ but eminently credible, with some basis all the way through. I still don't know quite why he sent someone off wandering pathways, for no discernible reason, but ... well, most of the story is fairly solid. His 'concept' of a believable fantasy world is just superb. I really loved the whole nanonics/affinity stuff, and thought it was really superb. But ... yeah. I could rant all day. I won't. But it's just as well he did actually end gracefully, as I might have had to go and violence his boats otherwise.

      Speaking of Hamilton.

      Ahem. There's enough good stuff in the books that you could make something decent out of them. After the editor takes a chainsaw and chops off the about 2/3rd of the page count that is complete filler and/or pointless characters with no personality having gratuitious but pointless sex with everyone. I think there's sub-genre for that kind of thing if you like such..

      Yup, there really are some good ideas there, 2 1500 page bricks would condense nicely into one 300-400 page book!

    230. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 1

      The early resemblance to Tolkien's style in the first book is deliberate, or at least so R.J.
      claimed, to make an easier transition for Tolkien fans.

      Mycroft

      --
      https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
    231. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by somersault · · Score: 1

      What would be wrong is that everything would end up the same. It's kind of like what's happening to the western movie industry right now.. everything tends to fit snugly into it's own little genre and have a predictable plot.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    232. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by Dan+Hayes · · Score: 1

      Amen to that. I tried, I really did, but the turgid prose, rambling travelogues and poor characterisation got me in the end. I just didn't care what happened, unless it was possibly Sam throwing Frodo off of a cliff, and I was guessing that wasn't going to be the case.

    233. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by Psyjack · · Score: 1

      I must agree. RJ has made me begin to cringe whenever I see a series of books on the shelf at the book store.

    234. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by Dan+Hayes · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Nice to see someone else who agrees with my thoughts on it. What I love about Jordan is the sheer scope and intricacy of the story, how there are so many disparate plot threads that weave in, out and around each other. I can't think of another series which has so many different characters as part of the story.

    235. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 1

      I know you're joking, but try the "Thieves World" series edited by Asprin (IIRC).
      It's pretty much each author gets a character or two in a shared setting to write about.

      Mycroft

      --
      https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
    236. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by Dan+Hayes · · Score: 1

      It's the Void Trilogy and it's set about 1000 years on from Judas Unchained. The first book is out here in the UK, and now that you've reminded me of it I'm going to go and get it in a bit :)

    237. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by Dan+Hayes · · Score: 1

      Tolkien may have created a whole history for his world and filled it in with stories here and there, but stories of mythic gods and elves don't match up to the dozens of vibrant, distinctive cultures that exist in the WoT. Tolkiens' societies, much like his characters, are very shallow.

    238. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by Bastard+of+Subhumani · · Score: 1

      Er ... right. Perhaps George Harrisson should have tried the defence that he ripped off someone else's tune to make it easier for people who'd heard the original to listen.

      --
      Only three things are certain; death, taxes, and apocryphal quotations - Ben Franklin.
    239. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by lazyl · · Score: 1

      I'm very surprised by the number of people here who apparently only liked the first 3 books. I thought the series was amazing through book 6 and only started downhill at 7. I have a hard time even picking my favorite of the first 6, though the climax of the 6th is definitely my favorite chapter of the entire series.

      --
      Aw crap, ninjas!
    240. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by speierc · · Score: 1

      I read them all. George would kill all the Forsaken that a left and most of the witches... speaking of witches.. Terry would take Rand out to the island were he would break the seal. Matt would save his butt. But really folks.. I think Harriet knows the end. There are plenty of Ghost writer out there for Book 12 and the finale book 13..

    241. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps George Harrisson
      Never heard of him, but his name sounds like a ripoff of one of the Beatles.
    242. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No he didn't.

    243. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by Boronx · · Score: 1

      Doughnut ewe mean they're?

    244. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by Endo13 · · Score: 1

      I guess that depends on your definitions of vibrant, distinctive, and shallow.

      While I enjoyed every one of Jordan's books, I found the characters all quite similar and very shallow, and though the world was definitely interesting, I found the cultures much less vibrant and distinctive than Tolkien's. His characters are all so similar that he had to come up with some particular peculiar mannerism of some kind to try to make them unique. But they basically all think and act the same way. Not as badly so as with Dave Eddings (his became so stale after about two books I couldn't take it any more) but still bad nonetheless.

      To sum up my opinion, Jordan had a great imagination. He just flat sucked at writing. But his fantasy world he imagined made his books worth reading, despite his lack of writing skill.

      --
      There is no -1 Disagree mod. Slashdot.org/faq defines mod options. USE IT.
    245. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, it pisses me off no end that the grandparent to this post was modded up to the heavens and this post, rightfully ripping a new asshole in the person who makes fun of someone who just died, was modded as flamebait. The moderators here have no respect for human life nor of people. There's a reason why I left Slashdot years ago (with a now-elite 4-digit ID to boot), and why I only post anonymously.

      I mean, really, learn some fucking respect. Get a fucking clue. And, yes, it should have been the other way around: MutualDisdain should have been modded up, and Rei should have been modded down to -1.

    246. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by Dan+Hayes · · Score: 1

      Note - I've only read the Hobbit and LOTR. Well, I gave up on LOTR about a third of the way through the third book after I just couldn't care about what happened next and couldn't read another page of endless travelling through Mordor. The Hobbit is a good book though.

      While I enjoyed every one of Jordan's books, I found the characters all quite similar and very shallow, and though the world was definitely interesting, I found the cultures much less vibrant and distinctive than Tolkien's.

      What cultures? Tolkien's world is largely empty, and the cultures in it to me seem to be obvious stereotypes with no real depth - you've got the rural England of the Shire, various cookie-cutter medieval kingdoms, the odd non-human enclave and then the Kingdoms Of EEEEVIL. None of the them are particularly dynamic or vibrant, and there's precious little insight into the details which make Jordan's cultures vibrant and distinctive. Looking here it doesn't seem as though there's much more in the rest of the books.

      I seem to recall there's more attention paid to elven cultures than any other, but it's easier to provide depth when you can define what it's like without it having to mesh with human nature. Jordan (and Martin, although his world is less varied) have come up with worlds which don't have other races or obvious fantasy religions to allow easy labelling of what makes each culture "different".

      His characters are all so similar that he had to come up with some particular peculiar mannerism of some kind to try to make them unique. But they basically all think and act the same way.

      Tolkien's characters are 99% mythical stereotypes who conform to their roles and rarely change - the king without a kingdom, the ancient wizard who guides the heroes, the young farmboys thrust into saving the world. Now Jordan starts with this as well (and said it was intentionally so to draw people in who'd read LOTR) but over the story the characters roles change as they deal with new situations, and not always positively, just like in real life. The only vaguely decent characterisation in LOTR is Sam and Boromir, although even in the latter case it's hardly the most convincing piece of realisation. Still, it is about the only real character conflict in the books, which I guess is to be expected when most of your characters remain rigidly the same throughout the story.

      I won't even mention Tolkien's female characters...

      Not as badly so as with Dave Eddings (his became so stale after about two books I couldn't take it any more) but still bad nonetheless.

      Eddings and Tolkien are similar in a lot of ways. Both relied heavily on classic mythic stereotypes, both had very distinct good and evil without much in the way of shades of grey, and neither had much in the way of character development. Eddings first few books were good, it's just that then he wrote the same story again and again, getting more and more shallow every time. Tolkien at least told different stories.

      To sum up my opinion, Jordan had a great imagination. He just flat sucked at writing.

      My opinion is different, but that's opinion for you. Jordan's books are some of the few where certain scenes can make me shiver.

      Actually I'd recommend Stephen Erikson's Malazan series if you like vast, intricate worlds. His training as an archaeologist really does show in the way his world conveys the hundreds of thousands of years of history that have taken place before even humans arose in his world, and that cultures are built on the ruins of those before them. There's very little in the way of mythic or fantasy stereotypes in the series, with highly distinct races, types of magic, and meddling gods and immortals that aren't the lofty abstractions of most fantasy. And, not only is he still quite young and healthy, but each book is mostly self-contained in that it tells a distinct part of the whole, and you only have to wait a year between book

    247. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      May God, or whoever he would have preferred, rest his soul.

      But my 2 cents is that the first book was great... the 2nd and third good but slightly more drawn out. The others (read through 9... had already bought 10 but i promise I'll never read it) were basically complete crap. Way too many pointless characters. The action was watered down to 10 pages per book... I started to hate 90% of the characters, there was too much "females vs males" constant conflict theme, etc. I mean... a theme is fine, but a conflict theme for 8000+ pages is just ridiculous.

    248. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To me, what it's about is:

      1. Good vs Evil
      2. Female Vs Male (not necessarily in that order)

      That's it. And while the first point is fairly enjoyable in a good book, the 2nd point (after book 3) was like watching a 20 year running Soap Opera. But not just watch every episode... but watching every episode in slow motion.

      Female1 is kinda bitchy and busts on guys like Rand. Rand gets mad... maybe after a couple of books gets a little payback.
      Female2 is kinda bitchy and busts on guys like Rand. Rand gets mad... maybe after a couple of books gets a little payback.
      Female3 is kinda bitchy and busts on guys like Rand. Rand(or other male) gets mad... maybe after a couple of books gets a little payback.
      Female4 is kinda bitchy and busts on guys like Rand. Rand(or other male) gets mad... maybe after a couple of books gets a little payback.
      etc.

    249. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is the Wheel of Time about exactly? Its not really about anything because its about everything. And its not about everything because its spends to much time focused on the minutia of individuals. It tries to paint a forest by telling you the story of every tree. And in the end you have neither a good sense of the forest, nor any decent connection to any particular trees.

      Actually, painting a forest by telling the story of every tree is a perfectly valid tactic, if done correctly. By this, I mean that it's important to weave a story for each tree, tell the story of that tree cohesively (and tell it to the end), and then move on to the next. Where the WoT fails at doing this (aside from the tedious descriptions, which don't really bug me that much) is that it tries to tell the story of each and every tree simultaneously, and thus chops the plot up into meaningless slices.

      As a fan of the serious, one of the amusing things that I've done when I get the urge to re-read things is simply chose a character, and read only those passages which deal with that character. It cuts 11 books worth of material down to one or two, and vastly improves your feel for the plot.

      In fact, in my opinion, that's the way the series should have been written in the first place. Give one book which completely tells the story of each important character beginning to end.

    250. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by COMON$ · · Score: 1

      Well that is disappointing, I have been looking forward to reading the wheel of time series, probably wont be as bad reading it all at once vs waiting for each book to come out.

      --
      CS: It is all sink or swim...oh and did I mention there are sharks in that water?
    251. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      it certainly refutes your accusation that I have never even read his work.
      How brilliant you must be, to refute an accustaion that was never made.
      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    252. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      There's even an in-joke for this located early on in the Fellowship of the Ring. I think it's when Bilbo gives his speech at the birthday party, and the hobbit audience becomes restless, worried that it was going to turn into another of his boring poems or songs.

    253. Re:a blessing on readers of Wheel of time by speierc · · Score: 1

      YES!!! Please Get David to write books 12 and 13!

  2. Damn by blackpaw · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Good journey Robert

  3. Death took him. by JeanPaulBob · · Score: 4, Funny

    And I'm pretty sure it wasn't Moridin.

    1. Re:Death took him. by joeshabazz · · Score: 1

      I had joked about this for a long time, but honestly I never thought it would happen. He really seemed like he was getting better. I'm your average desensitized media whore but I find I am actually sad about this.

      --
      but that's just my opinion -Mr. Miller
    2. Re:Death took him. by Moridineas · · Score: 1

      Hmm... wonder if it's time to retire this name? I based it off RJ's character.

      I've been reading RJ's books since I was in the 6th grade. At times they almost feel like they were a "real" part of my teenage development. Many of my friends were into RJ's books as well and they were a group experience in some ways. We talked about what would happen (heh, what still hasn't happened!), sometimes we roleplayed in Randland, and we quizzed each other on RJ trivia.

      I had the honor of meeting RJ at a book signing once, and he came across as an honorable, down to earth, and funny person.

      He will be missed, and I wish the best for his family and friends.

    3. Re:Death took him. by mrmeval · · Score: 1

      Yes it was. If you knew the creator of your whole universe was dying wouldn't you steal them, cure them and leave a worthless corpse in their place?

      Then you could write the universe as it should be. ;)

      Sort of a cross between Heinlein and King.

      --
      I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
    4. Re:Death took him. by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 1

      My brain just threw up.

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    5. Re:Death took him. by Jarik_Tentsu · · Score: 1

      Amazing author.

      To write twelve 1000+ page books is simply amazing. His books were so complete...so many things happen at once, and it all works together perfectly. There's so many characters, events and places, and the detail he took to describe all of them was so complex, I struggled following it - even remembering major things.

      For him to be able to have that much going in through his head, and still work so hard to finish it all...is amazing.

      Amazing author, amazing series...

      ~Jarik

  4. What really happened by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    God finally finished Book 11, said "Are you fucking kidding me?", and whipped out the Smite Stick.

    1. Re:What really happened by chuckymonkey · · Score: 0

      I know you're probably trying to lighten the mood a little, but a man died here. Have a little respect, he is the reason a lot of people have gotten into fantasy. Myself included, I was all scifi until I started to read his work and granted some of the books have been kinda rough but it was still a pretty good story and a rich world. By all reports he was a decent man so the least you could have done is at the end of your poor taste glib humor you could have at least said a kind word or two.

      Peace to you and yours Jim, we'll miss you.

      --
      "Some books contain the machinery required to create and sustain universes."-Tycho
    2. Re:What really happened by G-funk · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Hundreds or thousands of decent people died in the last 24 hours. If *you* have had enough of an effect on the the world that random nerds care enough about you to make a reference to your legacy, count yourself lucky.

      Robert Jordan wrote some great books. Then he turned 1 great book into 4 shitty ones, and unfortunately died before the end. Sucks. But if you can't laugh about shit, what's the point?

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
    3. Re:What really happened by stevo3232 · · Score: 1

      I think you need to see this post: http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=299497&cid=20633267

      --
      s.clementmonkey@sympatico.ca, remove the 'monkey'.
    4. Re:What really happened by abb3w · · Score: 1

      Robert Jordan wrote some great books.

      And, as noted at his roast, Chevy Chase made three really funny movies... and another 38 lousy ones.

      Chevy had the grace to laugh, especially when the roaster admitted Chevy had three more on the plus side than he did. From all I know of the man, he would have had similar grace — and motivation. Yes, he may have been a hack, but if so, a hack with more writing talent than I've yet mustered.

      Like his work or not, he wasn't a bad guy. Arguing about the quality of his books is a better tribute than many get or deserve... and probably as fitting a memorial as any.

      Resquiat in pacem, et lux perpetuae.

      --
      //Information does not want to be free; it wants to breed.
    5. Re:What really happened by Muggermuch · · Score: 1

      Mod up parent. It's quite possible the funniest comment in the discussion!

  5. Re:Kevin J Anderson and Brian Herbert by j235 · · Score: 1

    But first they'll put out a plethora of prequels.
    We'll see the final WOT in about 10 years.

  6. heh by stoolpigeon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I remember reading a Stephen King interview just after I had read The Gunslinger and he said that he didn't know if he would ever finish the Dark Tower series. I didn't touch any of them until after the last was published. I have avoided Jordan's series for the same reason - and it seems appropriate that I find out at slashdot that while King lived to finish his, Jordan didn't make it.

    --
    It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    1. Re:heh by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2, Funny

      To be fair, Slashdot has reported Stephen King's death almost as often as it's reported BSD's death.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  7. A real pity by gweihir · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Not that it is a big surprise. Personally I expected this message for about a year now.

    It would have been nice for him to be able to finish the series. True, a certain amount of foot-dragging in the middle of the series got him into this fix, but still I think somebody undertaking such a large venture, and mostly sucessfully, should have the satisfaction of seeing it finished.

    It will be interesting to see how this is going to be finished. The material should be there, but writning style is a major part of these books and not too easily emulated. There are layers within layers.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    1. Re:A real pity by bm_luethke · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Agreed, however I would at least like to see the answer to a few questions that were supposed to be resolved. Closure (and not closure someone else made up - what he actually intended from notes) is better than no closure even if it is obvious where the new author picks up. If he was on schedule then he I would think that he should have had a good deal of it done (a 2009 release date is fairly soon, it's not like one typically writes a 1000+ page book and go through editing/printing in a year), though I have no idea if he was anywhere close to on schedule.

      If it is just another author filling in the gaps and answering - me I'll read it at least for the parts that he wrote. However the other stuff I'll just pick my own conclusion and assume it is as much cannon as what is in the book. This is why I tend to not read large multi-volume stories until they are done, I have read some where they just end right in the middle.

      It feels kinda crass to feel that sorta thing about some guys death, but if he is like any other artist I would bet he is happy that many people are disappointed that they didn't get to see the end of his works. Especially given the scope and amount of time he put into the series.

      --
      ------- Sorry about the spelling, I suffer from two problems. Dyslexia makes it difficult to spell well, lazy makes it
    2. Re:A real pity by draxbear · · Score: 1

      Doh, I'm just starting #11 after a long break from the series. Given the amount of story arcs is something akin to the weaves in world-gating I really hope those notes are detailed!

      I agree the plot did seem to grind to a halt around #8 and #9 but he did start working through the huge to-do list in #10 (hopefully also in #11).

      Despite the various failings in the speed of the books, I am delighted with the fantasy world he created and the impress depth and detail he gave it.

      He will be sorely missed.

      --
      --- I've completed diagnosis of your problem and can classify it as a YOYO...You're On Your Own
    3. Re:A real pity by TheMCP · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And he would have finished it, if each of his books wasn't 150 pages or so of plot and 450 pages or so of whining about how come she has prettier embroidery on her dress than I have on mine and I'm jealous that she has better furiniture than I do and unending angst over whether or not I should use my powers and whine whine whine complain complain moan whine whine. If all his characters weren't such whiny bastards, the series could have been done several books ago.

    4. Re:A real pity by Kelson · · Score: 1

      If he was on schedule then he I would think that he should have had a good deal of it done (a 2009 release date is fairly soon, it's not like one typically writes a 1000+ page book and go through editing/printing in a year), though I have no idea if he was anywhere close to on schedule.

      From what I recall from recent posts on dragonmount.com (currently slashdotted), he did have the major events planned out, and recently told his wife and... brother-in-law? cousin? (the other relative who posts to the site, I forget how they're related)... the main story.

      So people close to him knew the key points, and I'm sure he had tons of notes. No idea how far along he was in actually writing, since he'd been fighting his illness for ~2 years now.

    5. Re:A real pity by mblase · · Score: 1

      It would have been nice for him to be able to finish the series. True, a certain amount of foot-dragging in the middle of the series got him into this fix, but still I think somebody undertaking such a large venture, and mostly sucessfully, should have the satisfaction of seeing it finished.

      I certainly hope George R.R. Martin is reading this. If he doesn't finish up "A Song of Ice and Fire" before he dies, I'm going to be profusely upset.

      On the other hand, at least he's (mostly) keeping himself on track the way he started.

      JMS learned in making "Babylon 5" why television doesn't usually bother with stories that last more than one season at a time; namely, your actors and/or network contracts can disappear in the middle of a story. Novelists likewise need to keep in mind the perils of creating stories that can take decades to finish writing.

    6. Re:A real pity by gweihir · · Score: 1

      I certainly hope George R.R. Martin is reading this. If he doesn't finish up "A Song of Ice and Fire" before he dies, I'm going to be profusely upset.

      Well, I think this increases the chances of ASoIaF being finished. And indeed, while GRRM has some size runaway, he is not as bad as RJ was.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  8. age by uigrad_2000 · · Score: 2, Informative

    The article appears to be slashdotted. According to wikipedia, he would have turned 59 next month.

    --
    Free unix account: freeshell.org
    1. Re:age by bigstrat2003 · · Score: 1

      Heh, actually, the link was slow as molasses long before this article went up, I suspect slashdot only gave it a last little push. Never underestimate the power of legions of readers.

      --
      "16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
  9. *sad* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I've only had a chance to meet the man on two occasions, but that was enough to make me know that (regardless what you personally think of his writing), the world has lost another Great One here. :( Farewell, Robert Jordan. You will be missed.

  10. Risk of never completing your thoughts... by Watersharer · · Score: 2, Insightful

    First, let my condolences go out to his family.

    The books started with such promise, action and just the right hint of risque possibilities. But by the 6th book it had taken on this horrific endless Days of Our Lives persona that you just knew would not end well. By the 9th book I was so sick of waiting for something, anything to happen that I was just about unplugged. My wife bought me the 10th book, and I did something I almost never do...I flipped to the end to see if he finally wrapped it up.

    I put the book on a shelf and never read it.

    Maybe wikipedia will post the ending someday, and I will chance across it.

    --
    Only tyrants and oppressors need fear a well armed populace.
    1. Re:Risk of never completing your thoughts... by fractoid · · Score: 1

      My wife bought me the 10th book [...] I put the book on a shelf and never read it. I bought it as reading material for a 5 hour plane flight. I got through about 20 pages. Shoulda taken the hint from that... :P
      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    2. Re:Risk of never completing your thoughts... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was about the time his wife decided she was going to be an "editor." She is a huge daytime TV fan and Soap Opera fan. Coincidence?

    3. Re:Risk of never completing your thoughts... by kalirion · · Score: 1

      Funny that in the 9th book, something did finally happen. A pretty big something. Then book 10 completely dropped the ball by not following up.... I haven't read book 11 yet, but from what I've heard, it's very good. 8 and 10 are the low points of the series that should be skimmed instead of read.

    4. Re:Risk of never completing your thoughts... by Mercano · · Score: 1

      Parts of nine, especially the Perin and the Tower threads, also fall into the skim category. (And, for the record, I loved Perin's scouring of the Shire in book 5, so its not the character, its the inaction and angst.)

      --
      #include <signature.h>
  11. Site has been slashdotted... by Telephone+Sanitizer · · Score: 5, Informative
    His site, dragonmount.com is already slow to load...

    The Google cache is old.

    Rather than overwhelm the dragonmount.com servers with slashdotters (let other fans have a chance to see it), here's the full text from the blog post. I hope that I'm not overstepping by reprinting it here.

    Sometimes even when you've fought your best....
    Sunday, September 16th, 2007

    It is with great sadness that I tell you that the Dragon is gone. RJ left us today at 2:45 PM. He fought a valiant fight against this most horrid disease. In the end, he left peacefully and in no pain. In the years he had fought this, he taught me much about living and about facing death. He never waivered in his faith, nor questioned our God's timing. I could not possibly be more proud of anyone. I am eternally grateful for the time that I had with him on this earth and look forward to our reunion, though as I told him this afternoon, not yet. I love you bubba.

    Our beloved Harriet was at his side through the entire fight and to the end. The last words from his mouth were to tell her that he loved her.

    Thank each and everyone of you for your prayers and support through this ordeal. He knew you were there. Harriet reminded him today that she was very proud of the many lives he had touched through his work. We've all felt the love that you've been sending my brother/cousin. Please keep it coming as our Harriet could use the support.

    Jason will be posting funeral arrangements.

    My sincerest thanks.

    Peace and Light be with each of you,

    Wilson
    Brother/Cousin
    4th of 3

    To Catalyst: Never, never loose faith. RJ did not. Harriet hasn't. I haven't. Going through what we have, our faith is only strengthened. Besides, if God didn't exist, we would have never had Jim. We did. God does. Remember my Brother/Cousin, my friend, think of him fondly and glorify God's name.

    Editor's Note:
    The entire staff of Dragonmount.com would like to extend its most deepest sympathies to Robert Jordan's family. He touched all of our lives in some way and we wish him the rest and peace he deserves. We will be posting information in the near future about where you can send condolences. Please check the News Section for these updates.
    1. Re:Site has been slashdotted... by rrhal · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Death is lighter than a feather, duty heavier than a mountain - The Great Hunt

      --
      All generalizations are false, including this one. Mark Twain
    2. Re:Site has been slashdotted... by TehSpida · · Score: 1

      RJ You are are a fantastic story writer. I've been a fan for a couple years now. I read the series from 1 to 11 then sat it down for a year, then picked it up and read it again to make sure I caught all the things i missed. The ability to collect so much information about a myriad of chars. Is something you had down to a T. I wish you and your family the best, and if my writing ever makes it anywhere You'll see your name under Inspiration . Good Luck.

    3. Re:Site has been slashdotted... by SkipRosebaugh · · Score: 4, Informative
      Why are people attributing that to Jordan, as if he made it up? He didn't. It's a Japanese saying:

      ". . . be resolved that duty is heavier than a mountain, while death is lighter than a feather."-First Precept of the Imperial Rescript to Japanese Soldiers and Sailors
    4. Re:Site has been slashdotted... by mblase · · Score: 1

      Why are people attributing that to Jordan, as if he made it up?

      Maybe because it was never credited as being Japanese in the Wheel of Time books? Just a guess.

    5. Re:Site has been slashdotted... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Indeed, that is a very purposeful thing he did in his works, he drew from cultures, so that the northern nations, along the Blight were drawing from Japanese culture prodominately, thus the Blightlander's saying is a Japanese saying, and their old fables are all historical events. Like the one about Queen Elizabth, and the one about Neal Armstrong. Unfortunately, it would ruin the atmosphere of the book if everything had a bracket behind it naming the origins of the phrase or cultural element, he left it for the reader to recognise and understand or simply accept and move on, oblivious to the allusions.

  12. To the trolls... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The guy died.. please, show a little respect for the dead.

    1. Re:To the trolls... by heinousjay · · Score: 1

      Why respect the dead? They don't care about anything anymore.

      --
      Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
    2. Re:To the trolls... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You might have a bad surprise. Down in the cellar.

    3. Re:To the trolls... by ThePeices · · Score: 1

      You respect the dead via the living, who are in a position to care.

    4. Re:To the trolls... by ultranova · · Score: 1

      Why respect the dead? They don't care about anything anymore.

      Because not respecting the dead tends to hurt the living people they left behind, especially in the case of the recently dead.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    5. Re:To the trolls... by jagdish · · Score: 1

      I think the slain care little if they sleep or rise again. - Aeschylus

    6. Re:To the trolls... by heinousjay · · Score: 1

      If someone is sensitive enough to be hurt by someone they don't know not caring about their dead loved ones, they're in for many nasty surprises unless they isolate themselves from the world.

      --
      Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
    7. Re:To the trolls... by Stroman+Rebar · · Score: 1
      Oh come on. Sure it's the internet and everything, but someone trashtalking about your recently dead loved ones, even if that someone is an anonymous stranger, can be upsetting. That is not being overly sensitive. That is just being human.


      And while the vast majority of posters on slashdot never met the guy, being a fan for multiple decades does tend to make folks feel connected to an author. So they have every right not to want to see the name of a man they admired drug through the mud. There is not much that they can do about it, but that doesn't automatically make them overly sentimental.

    8. Re:To the trolls... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Overheard at the Millenium PhilCon:
      "Are you going to the RAH blood drive?"

      "No point. Heinlein's dead. My blood would be of no use to him now."

  13. One of the best by TrailerTrash · · Score: 1

    The WOT was one of the best series ever, for most of its run. Though I have to admit, I did give up on it a few books back, when I realized it took nearly the whole next book for me to get back up to speed on the myriad subplots, and that the series was progressing more and more slowly each book.

    Calls of WOT being "milked" have been rampant. Many of the same criticisms have been leveled at the Sword of Truth series, which also seems to be slowing infinitely, in a sci-fi version of the paradox of Achilles and the Tortoise - given the amount of plot distance required to complete the overarching story arc, each book executes no more than half of that distance, requiring an infinite number of books to complete the series.

    A moment, please, while we all tug on our braids in silence for a gifted author.

    1. Re:One of the best by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The WOT was one of the best series ever

      I doubt I've disagreed more strongly with any statement in these pages, and that's really saying something. Jordan flatly cant touch:
      LOTR
      Earthsea
      Narnia
      Hell, I've some serious reservations saying Brooks/Eddings/Donaldson/Martin can stand up to those three, but they each sure still beat the pants off of something that became dull before Al invented the internet.

    2. Re:One of the best by Randle_Revar · · Score: 1

      WoT, as a whole, is vastly superior to Earthsea. Then again, just about anything is.

    3. Re:One of the best by aichpvee · · Score: 1

      I haven't read Earthsea, but George RR Martin's Song of Ice and Fire beats the crap out of Narnia. I'd say it's as close to Tolkien as anyone has ever gotten. Possibly better, if I were one to compare things to LOTR, which I'm not.

      --
      The Farewell Tour II
    4. Re:One of the best by bar-agent · · Score: 1

      Many of the same criticisms have been leveled at the Sword of Truth series, which also seems to be slowing infinitely, in a sci-fi version of the paradox of Achilles and the Tortoise

      Yeah, the middle books of the Sword of Truth series dragged on a bit, but the pace has picked up since then. The editing got tighter. You can tell that the plot is coming to an end.

      --
      i'd hit it so hard, if you pulled me out you'd be the king of britain [bash.org]
    5. Re:One of the best by Randle_Revar · · Score: 1

      I tried to read A game of Thrones, but I never finished it. I seem to have repressed those memories, since now all I can remember is something about medieval politics, a guy standing on a wall and some really weird stuff about a girl, her brother(I think) and a dragon egg. I'll take the Silmarillion instead, thanks.

    6. Re:One of the best by bhima · · Score: 1

      Earthsea is good. I think it's meant for kids but it is still good. Then she wrote a few other books in the Earthsea world, these are not as good but they are wonderfully sad.

      Song of Ice and Fire is also good and I also found it better than Narnia but I don't think one can compare it to Earthsea as they are completely different things. Come to think of it perhaps we should compare it Narnia either...

        I'm not comfortable at all saying things like "Tolkien > Martin > Le Guin> Jordan > C.S. Lewis" or "The worlds of Earthsea > Middle Earth > Song of Ice and Fire > Wheel of Time > Narnia". I don't know why I don't like that sort of thing... perhaps because it's suggestive that it's only possible to read one series when in fact it's possible to read all of them.

      I am disappointed that Robert Jordan has died and I'm conflicted about the Wheel of Time... I gave up on it in the face of multiple frustrations and of the multiple thousands of books I own I can only say that about of handful of books. I'm sure I'll finish these series on some rainy day... so I hope who ever completes it does it justice.

      --
      Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.
    7. Re:One of the best by speaker+of+the+truth · · Score: 1

      If you have trouble with Wheel of Time there is no way in hell you can read LotR!

      --
      Using openSUSE instead of Windows since 9th of October, 2007 and liking it.
    8. Re:One of the best by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Haven't read Brooks or Martin, but as a bit of nostalgia the last four series I read were the first and second Chronicles of Thomas Covenant, the Belgariad and the Mallorean, and Eddings definitely isn't anywhere near Tolkien, who although I personally can't fucking stand his writing style was at least a great author. Eddings... good God, if I read "oh ${ONE_DIMENSIONAL_CHARACTER}, you're a treasure!" one more God damn time I'm going at my eyes with large grit sandpaper. Maybe you're like me, and read it for the first time at 14 or so--I loved it then; looking back, I've apparently grown out of being fucking retarded. Now, you may say I haven't because I stuck with it through two whole series, but I'm going to call it 50% stubbornness, 45% incredulity, and 10% ... retardation. God what a horrible writer. Zakath's entire personality changes with no inner turmoil whatsoever, Eriond is all but forgotten for the majority of the Mallorean even though he's possibly the most important character, Sadi carries around an infinite supply of a drug for any situation but mostly throws "the brown acid" powder in dogs faces ... gah, I could go on for hours. I've rambled, but you need to re-evaluate your estimation there. The Elenium and whatever the other one was called was basically the same thing if I'm remembering correctly.

      As for Donaldson, yeah, he's an excellent author, but halfway through his first series I spontaneously coughed up an entire thesaurus and by the end I was pouring milk over bowls of Paxil for breakfast. The second series I think was just a transcription of the hallucinations of a high fever...

      No sir, as much as The Wheel of Time rambled in books 7-10.5, and as much as he allowed his taste in women to affect the characters he wrote (he could write good female characters, just didn't seem to want to), Mr. Rigney was a fantasy author of a caliber that hasn't been seen since Tolkien and won't be seen again for a long, long time. R.I.P.

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    9. Re:One of the best by 1u3hr · · Score: 4, Insightful
      WoT, as a whole, is vastly superior to Earthsea.

      Unless you prefer to measure quality, not kilograms.

    10. Re:One of the best by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      If you have trouble with Wheel of Time there is no way in hell you can read LotR!

      Sorry, I read LoTR three times as a teenager. Never could get into Jordan. Maybe it depends on whihc you read first.

    11. Re:One of the best by speaker+of+the+truth · · Score: 1

      Actually I tried reading LotR first and never could get past the first book (not the Hobbit, the first book of the trilogy). I did enjoy the movies though.

      --
      Using openSUSE instead of Windows since 9th of October, 2007 and liking it.
    12. Re:One of the best by Cederic · · Score: 1


      I disagree completely. Book 1 was tolerable, book 2 poor and frankly after book 3 I gave up and found something well-written to read.

      I continue to be amazed and disappointed at how highly so many people rate that series.

    13. Re:One of the best by domatic · · Score: 1

      As for Donaldson, yeah, he's an excellent author, but halfway through his first series I spontaneously coughed up an entire thesaurus and by the end I was pouring milk over bowls of Paxil for breakfast. The second series I think was just a transcription of the hallucinations of a high fever...

      The Gap and Mirror series were better (and Mirror only runs two books!) but you'll still have to put with characters so full of self-introspecting moral ambiguity that they can't stand themselves.
    14. Re:One of the best by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 1

      Oh, the introspective morally-ambiguous self-haters I can understand, I'm an extremely introverted type myself, although I got over the moral ambiguity and self-loathing shortly after puberty was over ... turns out that unless you're truly worthless, enough introspection eventually leads to answers :P I've thought of checking those out, maybe I'll do that while I wait for whatever form of book 12 comes out. Thanks!

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    15. Re:One of the best by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The last book in the SoT series comes out in November. The last two books plus the forthcoming were a sort of ending trilogy to the series.

    16. Re:One of the best by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 1

      One of the best series ever, but you couldn't finish it? How can you put those two together?

      I thought it started with promise, imagination, and a world of potential, and then faltered and fell apart in the massive proliferations of boring subplots and uninteresting secondary...hell, tertiary characters.

      Nothing was ever resolved. Whole books were taken up with conflicts that didn't even relate to the plot line of the series. Interesting main characters didn't even show up for whole books, while astoundingly boring third rank characters took up hundreds of pages!

      I stopped reading after book 7, and the fact that nothing ever went anywhere just spoils the whole series for me.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    17. Re:One of the best by Kelson · · Score: 1

      Nothing was ever resolved. Whole books were taken up with conflicts that didn't even relate to the plot line of the series. Interesting main characters didn't even show up for whole books, while astoundingly boring third rank characters took up hundreds of pages!

      I stopped reading after book 7, and the fact that nothing ever went anywhere just spoils the whole series for me.

      True for books 6-10. Subplots that took 4 books to resolve? Yeesh. Book 11, amazingly enough, started wrapping up plotlines like crazy -- I assume in preparation for the finale.

    18. Re:One of the best by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      While it's true that the writing isn't genius, WoT shines on detail - both the world and the characters are plastic. WoT is pretty immersive, even if much of it consists of people sitting around brooding (Rand, I'm looking at you). The character interaction is much more solid than in most fiction I've read and the characters have their own personalities, some of them quite unique. The world is well thought-out and one feels that RJ has spent some time thinking it through. A meandering story and mediocre writing keep WoT from being a "best ever" kind of series, but it is utterly enjoyable if you value things like character interaction highly.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    19. Re:One of the best by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My apologies for posting as an AC but I had modded several comments on this thread and didn't want to retract from those great comments by posting logged in.

      So, as far as Eddings goes, I have read through the Belgariad and the Mallorean several times - first at least 10 years ago in my 20s and, of course, since then. Yes, I agree that there have been several times when the "...you're a treasure!" line has grated on my nerves the older I have become but, the one-dimentional personalities of some of the characters was INTENTIONAL in my opinion. Why? Because they were there to serve a purpose - the Dreadful Bear, the Guide, the Man with Two Lives, etc. I also believe that, upon re-reading both of these series, I have found some of the greater depth in some of the characters -- Silk's great affection for Bethra and his response to her murder is outside his usual "I'm a sneak, a thief, a swindler, and will joke about it until I die" reason for being. There are several other instances where the characters step outside of their usual roles and display another side.

      All in all, I still find the two series to be a good read. I have not, as yet, read the other series he has written. Yes, some of Eddings prose does grate a bit and there are a few places where I just did the mental 'skip ahead' routine but there are problems with every series - some minor, some major - and each person decides what they like to read and what they don't. It makes the world go 'round. Besides, 19thNervousBreakdown, you're a treasure! :)

    20. Re:One of the best by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 1

      The Silk scene was good, I'll give you that, but Silk's also one of the better characters. Nothing on Belgarath or Polgara, but still. Hmm... but compare Silk's reaction with Bethra with Thom Merrilin's reaction to Dena. Silk's scene was neat, Thom's made me sad, angry, empty... I stayed up an hour later because I couldn't sleep afterward. Makes you wonder if RJ was a DE fan, though.

      Anyway, if you liked the Belorian Cycle you should read the Elenium. As I recall it was much better, more adult.

      Now I have something I need to do. See you later.

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    21. Re:One of the best by bubzor888 · · Score: 1

      It seems like I'm in the minority around here but the Wheel of Time easily my favorite series (Dragonlance and Dark Elf books included). I know it's not for everyone, especially since you really need to read it more than once to pick up on all the things that are going on. You say he rambles on, but there are references in the first book that don't actually happen until the 11th. (Severed hands anyone?)

      Is the world too complex for you? Get Reference Guide I know it can be slow at times, but don't know the series until you've read all the books that are out.

    22. Re:One of the best by merchant_x · · Score: 1

      I read the WoT of time up through book 10. The only reason I went that far is because I bought all 10 books at once do to many of my friends raving about how good a series it is. I pretty much hated every book after 3 or 4. If I had to read one more line about some woman staring daggers at some clueless male, for being male, I would have puked. But he has a very loyal core following. I don't see what they see in his work but I won't knock em for it. It's sad when an author you love and feel connected to dies.

      Anyway, for my money one of the best fantasy epics ever written for me is Tad Williams, _Memory, Sorrow, and Thorn_. It saddens me that no one one has mentioned him in the discussion so far. That trilogy really provoked a lot of feeling from me.

    23. Re:One of the best by aevans · · Score: 1

      Most people don't read to experience banal personalities. A good rule of thumb I use is: "If you can make it up yourself on the spot or get it from watching sitcoms better, then it's not worth my time." Of course, I could have great taste in television or a natural creative gift, so that standard may be too high.

    24. Re:One of the best by aevans · · Score: 1

      I actually preferred the Thomas Covenant IRL parts more. It'd've made an interesting story about a bitter, handicapped man with delusions who finds solace in his fantasies, and would be sympathetic if he weren't pathetic. It's a good character. But the whole moon rising at the same time every night is what killed it for me.

    25. Re:One of the best by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      Sitcoms have interperson relationships? I have yet to encounter one that uses the characters as something besides a way to set up the jokes. As for WoT... The relationships do get pretty complex and it is interesting to see how certain characters change and how they react to suddenly finding themselves on different sides of a conflict (and it gets even weirder because in theory everyone has the same goal). I think RJ pulls it off in a non-boring way, but then again I can stomach much of those relationships consisting of people not understanding each other and knowing it.

      Of course having the interpersonal relationships all tangled up in some of the more convoluted part of the story helps to keep them interesting.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    26. Re:One of the best by Dan+Hayes · · Score: 1

      Basically, avoid anything after the end of the Tamuli and you'll avoid having your memories of Eddings anally raped. Redemption of Althalus was pretty poor, and I only got about 100 pages in the first of the Elder Gods - it seems the trend is for the heroes to get smugger and more caricatured and their enemies to get dumber.

    27. Re:One of the best by Dan+Hayes · · Score: 1

      A lot of people seem to find it hard to deal with that the main characters don't give each other infodumps every time they meet up. Whereas I think one of the things Jordan captures well is that his characters don't always trust each other fully, and don't know what information the other would find important.

  14. Great by joe_cot · · Score: 0

    So this means I'll get to wake up my girlfriend like this tomorrow:
    "Well, I've got good news and bad news. The good news: Remember how you were worried the 'Wheel of Time' series would never end? Well, you don't need to worry about that problem anymore ...."

    1. Re:Great by bombastinator · · Score: 1

      I'm not surprised your girlfriend thought this. I remember taking a look at the guys photo on the jacket of like book 3, which was obviously horribly out of date, and thinking "he's never going to finish the series". Someone will finish it as a fanfic of course. It might help out for closure. Perhaps they will release his outline notes which will make it easier.

    2. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So this means I'll get to wake up my girlfriend like this tomorrow:
      "Well, I've got good news and bad news. The good news: Remember how you were worried the 'Wheel of Time' series would never end? Well, you don't need to worry about that problem anymore ...." If you wake your girlfriend up like this I have got some good news and bad news for you. The good news is that you will now have a lot more space in your bed...
    3. Re:Great by kypper · · Score: 1

      Someone will finish it as a fanfic of course

      Why do I suspect that the Forsaken will suddenly have tentacled monsters...?

    4. Re:Great by bombastinator · · Score: 1

      ...and Tuxedo Mask moon having a torrid love affair with Mr. Spock. Don't forget that one.

  15. Too Bad by ucaledek · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I got into Wheel of Time fairly young--maybe just after the third book came out--and kept with it despite the punishing slowness of the books after, say, Lord of Chaos. But it really was something different, I think. It was epic, not a standard journey to slay the bad guy after this first couple of books, like so much of fantasy after Tolkien it seems. And though slow and a little tedious at times, it never pissed me off like the last couple of books of Dark Tower, which it seems is the standard metric for WoT.

  16. Re:Kevin J Anderson and Brian Herbert by fractoid · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Bastard. Now I'll never know how it ends.

    Well, here's hoping he left enough notes (and by all accounts he would have) for the story to be finished off 'correctly'. I threw in the towel at the end of book 10 after none of the vital plotlines from book 9 were measurably advanced - in retrospect I should have stopped at book 7. Nonetheless, if it IS brought posthumously to some kind of conclusion it'd be nice to know what happens. A lot of wonderful storylines in an excellent fantasy world, if only he could have split it up into about 3-4 parallel series like Feist did with Midkemia.

    --
    Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
  17. Book 12 by fatboyslack · · Score: 1

    Well, hope they bring out Book 12 quickly in some form, finished by someone with talent used to working other peoples universes (Michael A Stackpole?)

    I say quickly, because the longer it is left the greater the expectation on the 'finishing' author, and the greater the perceived quality of Jordan's original proposals.

    I do wonder if once he found out about the illness it caused him to change some of his attitudes regarding what he would do to his characters in Book 12.

    Honestly I would be amazed if he could have brought it all together considering the meandering somewhat maddening pace of the previous 11 books.

    --
    Everyone thinks of changing the world, but no one thinks of changing himself. -- Leo Tolstoy
  18. A great author and an interesting situation. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I never got past the 7th in the series, college and life wound up killing off my reading time. However, I do remember failing in love with Jordan's writing style in the first books that I read of his, which were the Conan the Barbarian titles he wrote. I find it interesting that now, another writer might be able to pick up that mantle, and move forward with it. I just hope that whomever does so has the same appreciations that RJ did, such as war history and military tactics. Always seemed to me to flavor the works. At any rate, he was talented, and was one of the authors that opened up my mind as a youth, and also thereby ruined my eyesight as well.

    Rest in peace.

  19. At least... by anomalousman · · Score: 1

    I'm sorry to hear this terrible news.

    He have not quite managed to finish the series, but we can take heart that he at least he had time to write a sodding prequel while we were waiting.

    Turns out the Wheel of Time really doesn't have an ending after all.

    1. Re:At least... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Wheel of Time has no beginning and no end ... it keeps turning forever.

    2. Re:At least... by Remusti · · Score: 1

      There are neither beginnings nor endings to the turning of the Wheel of time.

  20. George RR Martin by germansausage · · Score: 1

    I hope George RR Martin is paying close attention.

    I love his "Song of Ice and Fire" (The Dwarf, in the toilet, with the crossbow, heh.) There was some talk when his last book came out in 2 parts that he was starting to show signs of "Jordan's Syndrome" Maybe this will help him focus. (and get the damn thing written).

    1. Re:George RR Martin by leguirerj · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and lets hope he isn't the author to finish Jordan's books. I stopped at book 8 of Jordan's. I just bought the latest book of GRRM and skip to the end and decided not to read it. Like the Jordan series, I decided not to read anymore of his books until he finishes the series. Same with the Sword of Truth series. I am 54 years old, I figured I would die before any of these authors would finish their series.

    2. Re:George RR Martin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope George RR Martin is paying close attention. Oh, he is.
    3. Re:George RR Martin by TheMiddleRoad · · Score: 1

      If George RR Martin dies before completing the series, I swear I'll kill him!

  21. First David Gemmell, now Robert Jordan by noah.richards · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It seems like yesterday that David Gemmell passed (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Gemmell), although it has been a year at this point.

    And now Robert Jordan passes. Say what you will about the quality of the later installments of the Wheel of Time, but the first five or six books (at least) are some of the most enjoyable and well-written fantasy I've read. Growing up, he was one of the authors who introduced me to fantasy, along with David Eddings, Terry Brooks, Terry Goodkind, Anne McCaffrey, and Tad Williams. I'm grateful to them all.

    (Perhaps) an appropriate Gemmell quote:

    "Not one of the creatures of blood can escape death. We all face it, and succumb to it. It follows us like a dark shadow. Yet, if we live in terror of it, then we do not live at all. Yes we are born alone, and yes we will die alone. But in between, we live. We know joy." --David Gemmell, Sword in the Storm
    1. Re:First David Gemmell, now Robert Jordan by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 1

      You need to take the words "five or" out of that post. Book 6 was without a doubt one of the best fantasy books ever written, even if you say only because of Dumai's Wells. The end--"Kneel, or you will be knelt."--still gives me goosebumps just remembering it.

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    2. Re:First David Gemmell, now Robert Jordan by Tarwn · · Score: 1

      I can't tell what's more depressing, Gemmel passing away or only knowing about it after reading a post on a board about a completely different author. Gemmel is without a doubt one of my favorites.

      --
      Whee signature.
    3. Re:First David Gemmell, now Robert Jordan by aevans · · Score: 1

      How can you "be knelt?"

  22. Re:Kevin J Anderson and Brian Herbert by aichpvee · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I've read a few interviews where he said that the ending had basically been written for years, so at least that's something. I hope they find someone to finish it. Despite losing a lot of focus in the middle it really has been a great series and was finally starting to look great again. It deserves an ending even if someone else has to fill in the gaps.

    --
    The Farewell Tour II
  23. Why Does It Matter? by logicnazi · · Score: 1

    Not that James Rigney died, I'm sure his family will miss him, but that someone else will finish the last book. Ohh and you **can't** doubt that it will be released, it's worth too much money to the publisher.

    I mean I too have the feeling that somehow it doesn't 'count' if you hear someone else's end to the story but why? Sure you might say they didn't have the original vision but why should it matter? Maybe their vision of the ending is better. It's not like there aren't plenty of authors who give an unsatisfying ending where you (an amatuer) are sure you could have done better so why shouldn't you believe the expert responsible for finishing it up won't be just as good as whoever wrote them originally?

    Luckily I think in this situation enough info was communicated to make this a non-issue. Though I've never gotten past book 9 or so.

    --

    If you liked this thought maybe you would find my blog nice too:

    1. Re:Why Does It Matter? by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 1

      It won't be better. It will be like a concert I saw a month ago. Alice in Chains without Layne Staley, even though Cantrell managed to find somebody who can sound almost exactly the same, just isn't. He really sounded almost perfect too, until you realized that all the "arharharh" type things Staley used to do were half of what made it great. And even though you could never put your finger on it, the emotion just wasn't there and thank God they didn't try singing Junkhead or Real Thing or something else like that. I mean, I loved the concert, amazing music, amazing talent ... but no, not the same, not even close. Book 12, the parts that he didn't write, are going to be just like that. A lot of what made you really believe the book was him knowing what the eyes of a killer look like, and seeing them in old photographs of himself. You won't find the same blend of military, political, and interpersonal knowledge, along with the empathy for his characters and ability to somehow be completely non-pretentious while writing possibly the most epic epic fantasy ever.

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    2. Re:Why Does It Matter? by kalirion · · Score: 1

      I mean I too have the feeling that somehow it doesn't 'count' if you hear someone else's end to the story but why?

      Actually, from what I hear Jordan had made pretty extensive notes on how he felt the series should end, just for this very eventuality. So we will be reading his end of the story, but it will be written in someone else's words and with someone else filling in the details.

    3. Re:Why Does It Matter? by justin12345 · · Score: 1

      I read an interview where he says that he wrote the end already. He claims that the Last Battle was the first scene to occur to him, and the rest of the story cropped up around it. I imagine that the first 1500 pages will be where the ghost writer comes in. Oh, btw Book 11 is one of the best in the series, I highly recomend it. Its shocking how quickly things begin getting resolved, especially after the slow pace of 8-10.

      --
      Cool art gallery, if you're into that sort of thing.
  24. Grammar Fascism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    whomever picks up the story

    Whoever is doing the picking, and is thus the subject and not deserving of the 'm'. If you want to sound fancy try whosoever, but better yet if you don't understand when to use whom, just don't use it at all.

    I apologise (sic) in advance, if you belong to a subculture to whom the rules of normative grammar do not apply.

    1. Re:Grammar Fascism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I apologise (sic) in advance, if you belong to a subculture to whom the rules of normative grammar do not apply.
      ...to which...
    2. Re:Grammar Fascism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't it a bit of an assumption to say that whomever gets chosen to finish the story is choosing himself? Howzabout you take your grammar Nazi comments elsewhere, or perhaps pick on one of the other 99 billion slashdot postings with seriously bad grammar instead of one that's only arguable at best?

    3. Re:Grammar Fascism by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Isn't it a bit of an assumption to say that whomever gets chosen to finish the story is choosing himself?
      It's the only conclusion that can be drawn when whomever is used with a verb in the active voice, a grammatical subtlety that seems to have totally eluded youm.
      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  25. and another one bits the dust by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just goes to show you that everything dies. The lesson is to never live.

    Those of us here are doing just that.

  26. See? by malthusan · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Even HE got tired of them.

    1. Re:See? by ThePeices · · Score: 1

      WHO got tired of them? ohh, him....no evidence of existance; next.

  27. a shame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a real shame. It sounds to me like he was beating the disease, but the damage to his heart was too far along and that's what killed him. Hopefully the publicity will help others who are similarly inflicted.

    I'll buy the final book when it comes out. Not because I think it will be a great conclusion to the series, but just so I can have some closure.

  28. Autodelete by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I seem to recall reading somewhere that Jordan had a particular vision for how he wanted the series to turn out (although many of the comments on this post suggest otherwise) and that he felt so strongly about not having someone else take his notes and direct his work in the event of him passing away that he had a set up in place to delete his notes should he die (whether this was some crude setup that could easily be defeated by booting from a device other than his computer's hard drive and then mounting the drive or something a little more complex I have no idea) - at the time this is one of the main reasons I didn't start reading the series. Did anyone else hear this rumor?

    1. Re:Autodelete by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 1

      No, exactly the opposite. He had plans in place for his wife at first, but it seems to have moved to others now, to finish the book.

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
  29. Damn! by Garridan · · Score: 1

    I gave up after book 7, and vowed to read the rest of the series once I knew it had an end. Now, I may never read the rest... this is really quite sad.

    1. Re:Damn! by buserror · · Score: 1

      Same here, I gave up in disgust at book 6 or something. I think I bought book 9 or so to try to see if anything had changed and gave up in disgust. /me readjusts his shawl and stomps off.

  30. Re:Kevin J Anderson and Brian Herbert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, he was dictating much of the story since he was too weak to write. Apparently he told the story in its entirety to his wife and his cousin just before he died. And he had an extensive library from which he used to create the series. It will only be a matter of time before all of this is compiled into the final book. Hopefully he recorded the complete story and all that will be needed is for the writers to put it down on paper. Either way, there are probably no major holes that need to be filled in (as with Dune or the Silmarillion).

  31. I can't even remember by wadiwood · · Score: 1

    how far I got. I think I liked the first four books, got annoyed with the fifth and when he kept spawning more and more plot lines instead of resolving some, any, please throw a mere cracker of a resolved plot line to your readers... I quit reading in disgust.

    I quit reading David Eddings when he had a fight with his publishers half way through a series and now I don't like to start a series until I have all of them.

    I was very happy with Neal Stephenson's Baroque Cycle. Though I feel I need to read a few history books to put it in context. And I really like the way Lois McMaster Bujold wrote the Vorkorsigan series. Each book stands as a complete story on it's own. She resolves almost all of her plot lines before spawning off dozens of new ones.

    It's a really facile way to write. Hmm, lets make a quest. Ok what obstacle can we put in our questor's way? Write about obstacle - how can we make overcoming the obstacle harder, include travel companions, split them up, give them their own quests and multiple obstacles, obstacles to the obstacles.... etc etc and you never have to finish - every plotline can be infinitely subdivided... and ultimately - you just piss off your reader...

    --

    -- it must be true, it's on the internet.
  32. Not tonight. by pxc · · Score: 1

    That joke might be funny next week, but it isn't funny tonight.

  33. Rest in Peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My condolences to Robert Jordan's family and loved ones.

    While Robert Jordan's recent books have not been as engaging as his earlier works, Robert Jordan was and is one of my favourite authors. Robert Jordan's Wheel of Time series opened me up to epic fantasy and more importantly is largely responsibility for my and probably many others love of books and reading.

    Robert, Rest in Peace your books will always have a place on my bookshelf.

    1. Re:Rest in Peace by onkelonkel · · Score: 1

      You forgot "Live Long and Prosper" and "May the Force be With You".

      --
      None of them can see the clouds; The polished wings don't care.
  34. The series WILL go on by YutakaFrog · · Score: 4, Informative
    Here's what Wilson (Jordan's brother/cousin, whatever that means...) posted in the blog on September 9th.

    Epilog: Yes he is continuing to work through all of this medical calamity. MOL is going into the word processor and onto audio tapes almost daily. Not every day mind you, because the medical fight takes first priority. But, he told you he'd finish and he will. Fact is that it has been finished in his head for years. During a recent family sit around, he became the Gleeman and told the bones of it ALL to Harriet and me. You read that right, I did say ALL. Don't ask, ain't telling. Two and a half hours of story telling by the Creator himself went by in the twinkling of an eye. Truly magical. All I can say is WOW! Best stuff he's ever done. MOL is going to knock your socks off! That's a promise.
    I'm saddened to hear of Jordan's death. Yes, there were parts (took me about 8 months to get through them this last time...) that were a little slow, but it was fantasy on a scale of epic proportions, and I thought he did a masterful job of it. Better than I could have done, at least.

    As for the story, the author may change, but book twelve will come out, and have exactly the content that he originally intended. If the storytelling style changes a little bit, it may be a refreshing end to a fantastic saga.
  35. Re:and completely boring news ... by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

    "for those of us who don't know who he is and couldn't give a flying f*ck about a third-rate writer from a country famous for its complete lack of literary skill..."

    So.. what.. did you emigrate or something?

    --

    "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  36. Once again by goldcd · · Score: 1, Funny

    we see the inherent disadvantage of 'close-sourced' authorship.
    People relying on Robert's output have now been left high and dry, without any guaranteed access to the source-notes.
    If only people had followed the clearly superior 'open-authorship' model - i.e. a few thousand people simultaneously planning, writing, editing model - then this could all have been avoided.
    When will we learn not to rely on this out-dated system of 'author' and 'reader'??

    1. Re:Once again by nonsequitor · · Score: 1

      I can't tell if that was a lame attempt at humor or just a really bad job trolling. Grow a soul and show some respect for the dead.

  37. Respect please by larske · · Score: 1

    I am really sad to hear this. I have read and enjoyed a number of the WOT books and even though there is much to criticize about dragging out the plot too long with meaningless subplots and inconsequences in the story I really do not care for all replies that disrespect him and his work with empty puns or even plain harshness.

    Yes, he is dead and is not hurt by these replies but he has given so much to the fantasy genre building up a huge fanbase with millions of readers of his books that I think that his work and his nearest should at least be respected. The mocking of the recently deceased is one of the clearest signs of lack of intelligence and compassion in my eyes and does not belong in any forum.

    Please!

    Safe journey Robert. I bow in respect to you. I am sure that you really tried to give us a grand and epic fantasy story even if it in the end was spoiled by meaningless commersial interests almost certainly forced by the publishing industry.

    1. Re:Respect please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      The mocking of the recently deceased is one of the clearest signs of lack of intelligence

      Some feel the same way about talking to the dead, or writing messages to them on slashdot. We all have our own means of coping with death, and thinking that of your own culture is the one true way, on a site read by people the world over, is just asking for the same disdain you're dishing out. Over here, 'not' making jokes would be considered rude. Fuck, I hope when I die I have a full room of people laughing at the little quirks that made me an individual. Even more so, I hope I don't have some jerk telling all my friends that they should be miserable, and not celebrating my life.

    2. Re:Respect please by Stripe7 · · Score: 1

      I have Book 11 of the WOT, I have only got to about 100 pages. The first 4 books were the best, after that it dragged for a bit, some of the characters seemed to be stuck in a rut doing the same things repeatedly. I hope a good author completes the novel using RJ's notes, the WOT is a long journey through the story land RJ created, it has it's ups and its downs, like any long journey it gets tedious, but I would like to see the journey come to a proper close. Robert Jordan, you will be missed.

    3. Re:Respect please by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 1

      Amen, brother.

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    4. Re:Respect please by larske · · Score: 1

      Note that I do not think there is anthing wrong with jokes about dead people if done with respect. I used the word mock (defined as 'to treat with contempt or ridicule'), not joke about. There is as far as I know no culture where it is ok to mock a deceased that has done no evil. He just tried to tell the world a fantasy tale. Is that worth contempt? Or disrespect, in life or death?

      I would not mind people laughing at my funeral either as long as it is done heartfully.

      "Safe journey Robert. I bow in respect to you. I am sure that you really tried to give us a grand and epic fantasy story even if it in the end was spoiled by meaningless commersial interests almost certainly forced by the publishing industry."
      Oops did I say that out loud? Shame on me!

    5. Re:Respect please by delinear · · Score: 1

      Yeah, in fact didn't someone once say: "If you must mount the gallows, give a jest to the crowd, a coin to the hangman, and make the drop with a smile on your lips" (Robert Jordan, The Fires of Heaven).

      Maybe the "don't joke, it's disrespectful" crowd should take a look at Jordan's *own* opinion on the subject and respect *that*.

  38. Stopped Reading Them Myself by yintercept · · Score: 1

    I admit, I stopped reading Jordan's series myself until I had some indication that he was going to actually finish it. When he chose the title "Wheel of Time," I was really hoping that he would do something along the lines of Ursula K. le Guin's trilogy of trilogies.

    Speaking of finishing things. I am really happy that JL Rowlings finished her series. She was making so much cash, that there must have been pressure to push the book beyond the originally planned 7 volumes.

    Sad,but commercial success can ruin a product.

  39. Re:I called this SEVENTEEN YEARS AGO by MutualDisdain · · Score: 1

    I bet your real life is just like your online life. You get really angry that everyone isn't bowing down and serving your will, and then some little kid barfs up his ice cream cone and you have to barf it up.

    If everyone online thinks you're a pathetic narcissist, then what does everyone in real life say that views your mediocre attempts at being a man?

    --
    - Yes, I am posting at a -1, and no I will not use a proxy to bypass my circumstances.
  40. If only . . . by cjp · · Score: 1

    He'd spent less time reciting his works in Second Life, and more time finishing the series!
    I think there's a lesson there for other authors. *glares*

    1. Re:If only . . . by delinear · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately promotion is a reality of publishing. An author who refuses to promote his works will find that he suffers financially as a result. If Jordan hadn't promoted his works he might never have been in a position to publish as much as he did.

      If anything, promoting stuff via the interweb rather than the old fashioned route of endless book store tours might give an author more time to focus on writing by reaching a larger audience with a lesser effort...

    2. Re:If only . . . by cjp · · Score: 1

      My comment was glib and not intended to be taken seriously.

      I don't know anything about the back end of book promotion, so I'm sure you're right :)

  41. A Great Series by speaker+of+the+truth · · Score: 4, Insightful

    People keep going on about how slow and long this series was, however it has been an inspiration to me and reminds me very much of the great George R. R. Martin series, A Song of Ice and Fire, which I've only just started reading. The only book I was dissapointed in was Crossroads of Twilight. In serial work not every issue can be a home run. Sometimes you need to make one be a sacrifice to set up the next issues which makes them even better. As a good storyteller, Robert Jordan realized this. Those that want EVERY thing to be issue, episode, whatever to be the BEST one there is, will of course not like this but I have a hard time thinking of any long pieces of serial work that they'll enjoy.

    --
    Using openSUSE instead of Windows since 9th of October, 2007 and liking it.
    1. Re:A Great Series by krelian · · Score: 1

      While A Song of Ice and Fire is an amazing series, the books left to write / age of writer ratio is not very promising.

    2. Re:A Great Series by jefu · · Score: 1

      Don't say that. Don't even hint at such things.

      I check Martin's "ice and fire update" page about every couple of weeks and it is still the page that was there back in February. Though his blog does note the passing of Jordan with regret.

    3. Re:A Great Series by Dread_ed · · Score: 1

      When I got about 3-4 books in (it had something to do with a magic bowl) I was already laboring under slow plot development that was putting me to sleep.

      Then, about two thirds of the way through the book, I read a rather generic paragraph describing horses and I swore I had read it earlier in the same book.

      Whether it was the same paragraph or it was just so similar that it gave the impression that I had read it before, or it was an actual paragraph from an earlier Jordan book I don't know. I do know that that sensation completely broke my sense of suspension of disbelief so thoroughly that I never read another book by Jordan again.

      I was very disappointed to say the least. The beginning of the series was fantastic.

      --
      When the only tool you have is a claw hammer every problem starts to look like the back of someone's skull.
  42. Crap... I'm halfway through book seven. by dickeya · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'd always seen this series in the book store but didn't start reading it until late last year. I was reading Goodkind at the time, but his character development was making me ill so I decided to switch. So far I've been quite happy with the series, with only a few characters being subject to speed reading.

    When I heard the news RJ was sick, I was really hoping the series would be concluded. He sounded quite hopeful, as people usually do, but in the end succumbed. I hope someone picks up where he left off and truly makes book twelve an icon of a great series and gifted writer.

  43. Shit... by Repossessed · · Score: 1

    Just... shit.

    --
    Liberte, Egalite, Fraternite (TM)
    1. Re:Shit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I second that motion. :(

  44. Re:and completely boring news ... by Khaed · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Wait, you're such a pussy you won't post the word "fuck" without an asterisk in an ANONYMOUS POST? Just what kind of a loser AC troll are you?

  45. Maybe the ending will never be? by caldazar · · Score: 1

    I met RJ at a book signing a few years ago. One thing he did say was that only he knew the ending to the series. He had never shared the ending with his publisher or even his wife.

    He said that no one had come close to guessing the ending and it would be finished when it is finished.

    I wonder if he really got that ending done?

    1. Re:Maybe the ending will never be? by Nimey · · Score: 1

      IIRC he had the final chapter written out for some time, and he's got notes so that someone else can pick up.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    2. Re:Maybe the ending will never be? by comradeeroid · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You know, as soon as you know you're more likely to die than to live another year an author who has the least bit respect for his fans would coredump everything about the end onto a few reliable persons. Jordan strikes me as one of those. He wanted us to know the end when he got there.

      --
      If you see a rock violating the law of gravity, then the law is wrong, not the rock!
  46. But which is worse? by TheSciBoy · · Score: 1

    No ending, or a bad ending?

    I've read through both series (the trick to finishing the last 3 books in the WoT-series is to skip ahead when there is a chapter with just a subplot, 99% of the story-line with the Aesedai, then it becomes a riveting read). But I must say that it was obvious that Stephen King too got tired of the series and just hobbled together the ending. The Dark Tower climax is a gigantamondic inti-climax of ginormous proportions. I won't spoil what the ending is. Only that it suuuuux.

    I had high hopes for the WoT-series though since I felt that he was picking up speed toward the end of book 11. There was something there, some big ending, a tie-together of all the story-lines into something satisfying. I doubt that anyone can finish the work now, not even with the help of his notes and knowledge of the original ending. Who can keep all those literally hundreds of different characters apart like he could? With different ways of speaking, dressing, behaving aso. There were no paper-thin characters in his books and you had to admire his dedication to fleshing out every character (at times completely halting the forward motion of the story, unfortunately).

    This is sad news to me and a bright star in a sky full of fictional authors has gone out. Let's remember the good parts and blissfully forget the bad ones, for they were infinitely fewer and less significant.

    --
    Badgers, we don't need no stinking badgers! - UHF
    1. Re:But which is worse? by stoolpigeon · · Score: 1

      I liked the end of Dark Tower.

      --
      It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    2. Re:But which is worse? by All_One_Mind · · Score: 1
      Ha ha. No that anyone cares or will probably even read this, but I happen to think the ending of the Dark Tower series was damn good. And without spoiling anything, how could a tale like that, which revolves around so much metaphysics and conceptual versions of God have a standardized, cookie cutter ending? I think, give the subject matter, King took what was probably one of the best options he had.

      With that argument aside, the Dark Tower series did get progressively worse over time, but nowhere near as bad as the Wheel of Time. I started reading book six and just said fuck it. Too boring, too much detail, too many "main" characters.

    3. Re:But which is worse? by TheSciBoy · · Score: 1

      Ah. But, you see, to me that ending was a cop-out, just for the very reason you discribe.

      Well, your opinion is just as valid as mine, and since someone else here also liked the ending, then I must concede that maybe he wrote a good ending after all. It just didn't sit too well with me. :)

      Nevertheless it is interesting to note that the longer his books took to write, the shorter they were. The first book, which took a really long time to write (I think 10 years or something) was fairly short, 200 pages or something, and then I remember getting the one with the train, which was really thick. Fortunately, King has such a high lowest standard that even when he was writing those really long books, they were very good, unlike Robert Jordan, whose penchant for infuriatingly (but amazingly) detailed descriptions of peoples and places just grinds any story line to a screeching halt.

      Say what you want about the length of King's books, but he is very very rarely longwinded.

      --
      Badgers, we don't need no stinking badgers! - UHF
    4. Re:But which is worse? by illegalcortex · · Score: 1

      Just wanted to throw in that I liked the DT ending, too. But yes, the books were getting bloated as time went along and lost some of the magic that Drawing of the Three had.

    5. Re:But which is worse? by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      The Dark Tower climax is a gigantamondic inti-climax of ginormous proportions.

      Wow, I couldn't disagree more. The "ending" to DT left me with shivers, despite the fact that, frankly, the lead-up was a bit of a stinker (he goes on and on about Mordred, and that's what happens to him? Meanwhile, *that* is the Crimson King? Seriously?).

  47. Why the book world needs good editors by edderly · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Although some of the comments here have been fairly tasteless (what do you expect on the Internet) I think it is fair time to reflect on an author's works.

    Obviously and unsurprisingly the Wheel of Time series dominates our impression of Mr Jordan. I'll start with saying that stand alone the first book is one of the best fantasy fiction books out there as far as I am concerned. I found the style and story imaginative and compelling, which is difficult to do in a heavily cliched genre.

    However, like many others I went along for the ride with the rest of the series up until a point where I became frustrated with the author and I personally gave up at about book 9 though I had effectively given up on the series a couple of books before that.

    I don't really know what Jordan's rationale for the length of this series was, I'm not a fanboy and don't follow any of the WoT forums for any insight into this, maybe I will do one day. I generally assume that he felt he had a story to tell and as far as he was concerned if it took many books to tell it - he would do so.

    The lessons of the 'Wheel of time' series are that you need to bring all your readers with you, and that the value of literature isn't in the weight of paper. Readers are frankly puzzled that after 4 to 5 thousand pages why Jordan left his main characters in stasis whilst opening up new plots and new characters in the later books. The publisher and editors have a responsibility to help authors in this regard even if it causes tension. I'm left wondering if Jordan had a more focussed approach he would have been the top fantasy writer of his generation, but now I suspect he will be remembered as a curiousity.

    RIP Robert Jordan

    1. Re:Why the book world needs good editors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Translation:

      what an ass, how dare he not write limited-character focused fiction like everyone else

    2. Re:Why the book world needs good editors by Number6.2 · · Score: 1

      I gave up around book 4. If you can't save the universe in three books you're just milking it. The first three were good, though.

      Agreed, RIP.

      --
      "If god did not exist, it would be necessary to invent him" --Voltaire
    3. Re:Why the book world needs good editors by joebooty · · Score: 1

      I must agree. At one point these books were very meaningful to me. I would eagerly await each new arrival and plow through it in a day. By book 7 I was fairly concerned by the sheer number of characters being introduced who served almost no purpose. Path of Daggers had, at most, 4 useful chapters. I bought book 9 and I read about 2 chapters before shelving it and that is where I stand today.

      I am sure I would have picked up the final 3-4 books and read them all once the series was completed but I guess that will never happen now. I am sure if I did though those books would be full of Aes Sedai I had never heard of, talking about people I could barely recall while traveling to some place that I would need to refer to a map to have any idea where it was.

      I really liked the first few books but the WoT will still stand as the premier example of a writer who tastes success and then somehow 'graduates' from needing an editor. In Jordans case it appears the editor played a fairly critical role in determining the quality of the final product.

    4. Re:Why the book world needs good editors by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 1

      The publisher is only going to encourage excess, because it prolongs the gravy train. I can't believe how many people are posting things like, "I started hating the series at book 8, but I'm heartbroken that I won't see the end!" They knew they had you hooked, and were just milking you for an extra dime.

      The only two possibilities are the following:

      RJ got famous enough that he could tell his editors to go screw themselves, and got lost in his own subplots. I call this "The Stephen King disease" after it's most famous victim.

      or,

      The publishers and editors actively encouraged him to linguistic excess to reap greater profits from his work.

      I'd prefer the latter, honestly, because there is nothing worse than seeing a genius lose his focus and purity and fall vicitm to his own bad habits. Better it was greed than venal stupidity.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    5. Re:Why the book world needs good editors by Nathgar · · Score: 1

      I'm going to go with option three. Raving fans demanding a book asap. With most writers (Jaqueline Carey, Terry Goodkind, David Drake to name a few) on a year to year and a half cycle, Jordans 2+ year cycle on some of the books had fans wanting the books sooner and faster. For books 7,8,9,10 Tor, and Jordan opted for a half editing cycle to get the books out faster to appease the fans. Book 11 which was one of the better ones in the series had a full editing cycle. I think if Tor and Jordan had opted to give it a full editing cycle for those 4 books we'd have series that read differently and flowed better. A lot of fans wanted it as soon as Jordan said my part is done undermining just how important those editors were to keeping his story somewhat focused.

    6. Re:Why the book world needs good editors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It seemed more like people were enthusiastic until about book 6, then there was a shallow cull until either book 8 or 9, depending on the reader, at which point a lot of the herd stopped reading and took a wait-and-see attitude, where they would finish the series once it ended. Most of them reasoning (correctly) that Jordan would die before the damn thing was finished.

    7. Re:Why the book world needs good editors by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 1

      It's rare that a shorter copy/editorial cycle will produce longer works. Anyway, the simple truth of it is that there are whole books that should have been edited out, and no one did it. Either he had amazing free reign: "You can have the first chapter when I finish the last chapter and any edits will cause the next book to be 6 months later" or someone was encouraging him to write longer.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
  48. very sorry to hear of this by Dimble+ThriceFoon · · Score: 1

    been reading his WoT books since the third was released, and enjoyed them a great deal.

  49. Dotcache's copy. by antdude · · Score: 1

    Click here. Slow, but it loads.

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  50. I guess... by Ayanami_Rei_II · · Score: 1

    ...Nynaeve won't be curing death after all.

  51. What's important... by me-g33k · · Score: 2, Insightful

    No matter what one thought of his works, we should remember that what was posted was about the passing of a man that has touched thousands of souls. Whether for good or ill, the fact that he has reached so many deserves some measure of consideration and respect. If nothing else but to contrast our own passing in this journey, we could hope that our own foosteps will leave behind a fragment of the memory that this soul has done.

    To the detractors I say, perhaps if you would look upon yourself and wonder what those you have touched would utter at your own passing, perhaps some charity and kindness would not be un-deserved.

  52. amyloidosis by ebolaZaireRules · · Score: 0

    I see many posts about his books (which I _have_ read), but none about Amyloidosis.

    This is a little sad, because Amyloidosis is quite a hard disease to diagnose.
    Not that its particularly hard with its symptoms, but because it has a low profile, including in the medical community.

    A friend of a friend (did I actually write that?) had it, and it took years to be diagnosed (it was in the liver).
    His widow travels the world to keep in touch with the latest developments, and promotes the support groups cause.

    Have some compassion, people.
    Its a sad thing to say, but perhaps greater understanding will come with greater exposure.

    --
    The Bible: Historically verifiable fact from an observers point of view
  53. Brother/Cousin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Here's what Wilson (Jordan's brother/cousin, whatever that means...)"

    I would guess that means they come from the deep south.

  54. Nooooo by Dersaidin · · Score: 1
    I love those books.

    Sure they drifted off a bit between book 4 and book 10, but the endings were always epic and exhilarating.

    This is not only sad because of his passing, but also because it leaves this grand epic unfinished, and without the promised prequels :(

    I hope his notes will at least give closure to the tale... I wonder if they'll be released completely untouched as well as (no doubt) a conclusion completed by someone else.

    RIP Robert Jordan, Thank you.

    1. Re:Nooooo by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 1

      That would be ideal. Personally, I'd like it most if they just released what he had written so far, with the best explanation of the ending he dictated to his wife and cousin/brother a couple days before his death without trying to mesh two authors into one book. That would be closure enough for me, and as long as he didn't introduce any more characters, it would play like a movie in my head after how well we know the rest of them. That, along with the notes (who killed Asmodean? Who? Who? (it was Lanfear, used her wishes and got killed)), would be perfect.

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
  55. Ten years ago, I said... by the+grace+of+R'hllor · · Score: 3, Funny

    Ten years ago, I said that if he were to die before he finishes the series, I'd kill him. Suddenly, I am seeing logistical difficulties.

    My thoughts go out to those who have lost more than a good author.

  56. Too bad by slayermet420 · · Score: 1

    That really is too bad. The series definitely went down hill, but I kept reading it, waiting for it all to wrap up with book 12. I hope it can get finished.

    --
    Geeks strike again 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
  57. Not long ago... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    ...I went out on a first date with a girl who read all of the previous books (it came up during a conversation about our favorite authors). She told me about this guy's illness and how she was going to be really upset if she slogged through the previous 11 books only to have him die before he finished writing the concluding volume.

    She went on to very rudely not return my calls or emails after that instead of being honest enough to admit to me that she wasn't interested. In light of that, all I can say about this news is... HA HA! You're not getting closure, either!

    1. Re:Not long ago... by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 1

      rofl.

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
  58. SOT is done in November of this year. by haplo21112 · · Score: 1

    Sword of Truth is done this November. At least the Story Arc that started with "Wizards First Rule". If Goodkind moves on from there I'll probably take a wait and see tone, pulling this arc out over something like 15 years was sorta painful. I enjoyed the books, but I think he could have cut to the chase here or there!

    --
    Power Corrupts,Absolute Power Corrupts Absolutely, leaving one person(group)in charge is absolutely corrupt.
    1. Re:SOT is done in November of this year. by Sancho · · Score: 1

      The thing about SoT that was great was the characters. The writing isn't particularly good (there's always a Deus Ex Machina moment at the end of each book) and the stories, while interesting, aren't particularly innovative.

      Unfortunately, I think he lost his characters somewhere around book 6. They just dried up. Book 7 (Pillars of Creation) was where he seemingly tried to revitalize the series by having a new protagonist, and he failed miserably.

      I put off reading Chainfire, and was glad I did when I found out that it was a cliffhanger. When Phantom came out, and I found out that it was going to be a trilogy, I held off there, too. Once Confessor comes out (being the promised end to this series and arc), I'll probably finish the series for completion's sake, and I really hope they get better, but I'm not holding my breath.

    2. Re:SOT is done in November of this year. by Xight · · Score: 1
      Thanks for letting me know about the trilogy for the Wizards First Rule storyline. I have Chainfire and Phantom sitting at my house for the last week or two. I'll just wait for the 3rd one too so I can read it all at once. The series did seem to slow down a bit so I've been putting off reading the last few.

      The problem with many novel series is that if it gets too long there is just too much to keep track of. You end up having a full size book with only some of the characters (like George R Martin's last book imo).

      I just hope that whoever decides to pick up the torch after Robert Jordan is able to finish up. I think even a somewhat disappointing ending to a storyline might be better than no ending whatsoever. I hate unfinished endin

    3. Re:SOT is done in November of this year. by Dan+Hayes · · Score: 1

      Great characters? Sure, if you like genocidal madmen who is happy to condemn men, women and children to rape, torture and death whilst spouting Objectivist platitudes and somehow being amazing good at absolutely everything.

    4. Re:SOT is done in November of this year. by haplo21112 · · Score: 1

      Chainfire is slow, slow, slow at the start, it doesn't really pick up until the end of the middle part of the book. Phantom suffers from a similar situation. Both are good in the end and you can feel that its all definately building toward the third and final book. It certainly shows that all three were conceptualized as a single whole however.

      --
      Power Corrupts,Absolute Power Corrupts Absolutely, leaving one person(group)in charge is absolutely corrupt.
  59. Kevin J Anderson and Brian Herbet? by haplo21112 · · Score: 1

    They did a pretty good Job picking up Frank Herbet's notes and extending the "Dune" universe. Perhaps they could get this one finished up.

    --
    Power Corrupts,Absolute Power Corrupts Absolutely, leaving one person(group)in charge is absolutely corrupt.
    1. Re:Kevin J Anderson and Brian Herbet? by jeffasselin · · Score: 1

      Hope that's sarcastic. I didn't touch the prequels, having heard about how bad they were. I leafed through the new sequel the other day in a bookstore, and I read a few pages. It was the worst tripe I'd ever heard. Even the worst of WoT is better than that.

      From what I understand, Herbert son and Anderson published the prequels first because they thought they couldn't make the sequel without the explanations from the backstory (and to make more cash obviously), but Herbert (father) would have ignored all that and given us a great book which we wouldn't have understood half of until we'd read it 5 times. I prefer it that way.

      --
      If he explores all forms and substances Straight homeward to their symbol-essences; He shall not die.
  60. what is really sad by thedreameater · · Score: 1

    is your lives. I wasn't a huge fan of the books either, but the man died. I thought I was reading Kotaku's posts for a while. So many of you spit on his name, as if you've written, no, published a sentence yourself. Gratz on spitting on a grave, hope your kids get cancer. :D

    1. Re:what is really sad by wezeldog · · Score: 1

      Exactly. I couldn't finish book one. However, I can't begrudge a fan for liking something that doesn't interest me. I have wandered the halls of the Hyatt at DragonCon and let me tell you that there aren't a more fervent fanbase than the WoT folk. Small, yes, but fervent. I don't like Buffy either, but I wouldn't pile on Joss Whedon if he died tomorrow.

    2. Re:what is really sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Gratz on spitting on a grave, hope your kids get cancer."

      Ever notice how rude the people that say "don't be so rude to a person you've never met" can be?

    3. Re:what is really sad by edittard · · Score: 1

      I have wandered the halls of the Hyatt at DragonCon
      When it comes to bragging rights, I'm afraid that isn't even in the same league as seeing C beams glittering in the dark by the Tannhauser Gate. Sorry.
      --
      At the bottom of the /. main page it says 'Yesterday's News'. Well they got that right.
  61. Re:Kevin J Anderson and Brian Herbert by Murphy's+Paradox · · Score: 1

    Honestly, the 11th book was a whole lot better than 10; there were actual plot resolutions.

    --
    Murphy's Paradox... the more you plan for success, the more avenues there are for failure.
  62. One day by west.to.east · · Score: 1

    I will read the entire series in a week, no matter how much crystal I need.
    I have great memories of being 15 and reading the first 3 books in marathon cover to
    cover sessions, enthralled with the world created. I ended up stopping after book 6,
    having enjoyed it, but, like friends sometimes do, we just drifted apart.
    Thankfully, I didn't have to endure the decline that so many fans lament. It happens
    in art all the time, although I agree with an earlier post that editors and
    publishers should take most of the blame.

    1. Re:One day by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 1

      One of my best memories is staying home sick from school with a fever. It was the beginning of September, and about 90 degrees out, so I had a fan going in the window, and I laid on my bed and read book five cover-to-cover in one sitting. When I was done, I was so pulled into the world that I heard the fan going and freaked right out. All I can remember thinking is, what the fuck is a fan? Then I realized that I just wondered what some thing from the future was that I just referred to by name, and then I wondered how in the hell I knew it was from the future, and then I really got twisted. I just sat there with a "poleaxed" look on my face for a good ten minutes before I could think my way out of that mental tar baby.

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
  63. Well said, sir! by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    I couldn't have said it better myself. Well, I probably could, but only just.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  64. Tarmon Gai'don has come and gone by hansamurai · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've only "known" Robert Jordan since January, when I started reading The Eye of the World, the first book in the Wheel of Time series. I started reading knowing full well that the series begins to go downhill, as my cube neighbor was a huge fan and has read the series through twice and began reading it again when I did (and even though he was a huge fan, he could admit pretty much exactly where the series falls off).

    I have recently finished the sixth book, and I can begin to see a downward trend. But I so thoroughly enjoyed the first few books, I have to go on. Honestly, the first three books are amazing in my opinion, and you can always count on Robert Jordan to deliver a fantastic final 100 pages, even if the 600 before that were worth speed reading.

    Even though I've only been in Robert Jordan's universe for a few months, I still feel his loss. It saddens me to know the series may never be complete, and if it is, it won't be completely his vision. Whether this is for better or worse, it still bothers me. I will continue to go on with the series, maybe at a slower pace so I can time the final release better if we ever hear a date.

    Here's to you Robert Jordan, thank you for the little time we had together, I still look forward to the future.

    Death is lighter than a feather, duty heavier than a mountain.

    1. Re:Tarmon Gai'don has come and gone by tenchiken · · Score: 1

      Don't give up on it. Winters Heart and the last one are actually very well worth reading.

    2. Re:Tarmon Gai'don has come and gone by Kelson · · Score: 1

      I have recently finished the sixth book, and I can begin to see a downward trend. But I so thoroughly enjoyed the first few books, I have to go on. Honestly, the first three books are amazing in my opinion, and you can always count on Robert Jordan to deliver a fantastic final 100 pages, even if the 600 before that were worth speed reading.

      If you can slog through books 7-10, book 11 picks things up immensely. It's as if he looked at his outline, said, "crap, I've only got 2 books left to wrap all this stuff up!" and started closing off threads that weren't directly connected to armageddon.

      The prequel, New Spring, is also worth reading as a character study of young Moiraine. I enjoyed it much more than I did books 9 or 10. Though that may have been in part because I knew it wasn't going to advance the main story, and wasn't disappointed by the fact that it didn't.

    3. Re:Tarmon Gai'don has come and gone by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 1

      Book 11 is worth books 7-10.

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    4. Re:Tarmon Gai'don has come and gone by speierc · · Score: 1

      Yes, I agree with you...Suggestion is to listen to books 7-10.

  65. Re:Kevin J Anderson and Brian Herbert by nahdude812 · · Score: 1

    Agreed, I got a definite sense that he was feeling his mortality and working hard to tie things up.

    He almost lost me around book 10 because as others have pointed out, you could skip this book entirely and not be surprised by anything you read in book 11.

    I would like to know how it ends though, I still think of the entire series fondly, even if I did feel like he was milking it for a while.

  66. No finish? by Mongoose+Disciple · · Score: 1

    Despite what TFA says, I swear at some point I read that Jordan had said that if he died before finishing the book, he didn't want anyone else to finish it. Does anyone know A) if this is true and not just a figment of my imagination and B) if so, how/when he recanted on that?

    I stopped reading about five books ago, but I'd thought to go back and try to finish the series once it was actually done. I have to assume somewhere in the collective throbbing brain of Slashdot geekery, someone's been following this more closely than I have and has additional details.

    1. Re:No finish? by moeinvt · · Score: 1

      If that's true, I think it would be really cool if they just tried to organize his notes and transcripts in some logical manner and then publish them "raw" so to speak. That way, the fans could draw their own conclusions as opposed to having to read a contrived and subjective narrative. At this point, I'm much more interested in knowing what he had envisioned for the ending than in reading the actual story.

  67. Its not rocket science folks... by bradbury · · Score: 1

    He should have just undergone cryonic suspension, in which case when he was revived he could pick up where he left off (for better or worse)...

    (And for those of you chuckling in the wings in disbelief (with respect to whether cryonic suspension and reanimation will work -- I am more than willing to go head to head with you on the mats on that count.)

    The failure to consider and recommend cryonic suspension as an option (compared with being buried or incinerated) is killing far more people a year that George W. Bush is. One is only really "dead" when the molecular disassembly process is complete. Before that point of existence, you are simply less alive.

    1. Re:Its not rocket science folks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, no. When someone freezes you, you are not suspended. You are dead. The ice crystals form in a jagged fashion and lacerate your cells. Even partial freezing and thawing just leads to serious permanent brain damage.

      Modern cryonics do not keep you alive. They kill you dead.

    2. Re:Its not rocket science folks... by Wordplay · · Score: 1

      While I don't dispute the "kills you dead" part, modern cryonics doesn't freeze you. It vitrifies the brain, avoiding the ice crystals. Read Myth #2.

      http://www.alcor.org/cryomyths.html

      I find cryonics to be attractive in a "hedging the bets" kind of way. It's not so much that I think that it'll work as that the downside is relatively small if it doesn't (you're out a life insurance policy you arguably wouldn't have purchased anyway).

      However, Penn Gillette said something on BS that has made me question the entire concept; paraphrased: "Even if it does work, you're just paying for your perpetual storage. Who do you think is going to be charitable enough to pay for thawing, reconstructing, and rehabbing you? Evil geniuses needing goons, that's who!"

      Absurdity aside, he's kind of got a point. Seems like a gamble to count on altruism. There are things worse than death.

    3. Re:Its not rocket science folks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, no. 40% water left, means 40% still forms ice crystals. BTW, removing all water from someone kills you too.

      It's not hedging your bets, it's just suicide. Which means instead of hedging your bets, you're going straight to hell.

    4. Re:Its not rocket science folks... by Wordplay · · Score: 1

      Now, that's just ridiculous. They legally can't do anything with you until you've been pronounced dead. They don't freeze you while you're still alive, and none of the cryo places will touch assisted suicide, so even the Catholics are safe.

      As far as the 40% goes, they imply it prevents crystalization entirely, which I am inferring to mean that we're not talking about 40% of the mass being watery and 60% being something else, but rather that you end up with a solution of 40% water and 60% of a cryoprotectant. 40% water/60% propylene glycol has wildly different freezing and crystalization properties than 100% water so the concept is entirely plausible. Using their own cryoprotectant (not antifreeze :), Twenty-First Century Medicine has already vitrified a rabbit kidney then thawed and reinstalled it successfully, so the tech is promising.

      http://www.21cm.com/index.stm
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vitrification

  68. Re:Kevin J Anderson and Brian Herbert by Chimera512 · · Score: 1

    good to hear since I hadn't the stomach for 11 after 10 did nothing but catch up subplots or start new ones, from what I remember. Sad he's died though, my first girlfriend got me into those books back in high school. They were good when you're not expecting high-grade fantasy and are just watching the characters, It's clearly ridiculous in places.

  69. OOOH NOES! by uncledrax · · Score: 1

    Now I will -never- get my Conan Books autographed! .. I mean.. at least his part in that series was actually completed....

    suckas!

    --
    ----- The internet has given everyone the ability to have their voice heard equally as loud.. even if they shouldn't be
  70. Not an ending, a beginning! by Dareth · · Score: 1

    "There are neither beginnings nor endings to the turning of the Wheel of Time. But it was a beginning." Jordan

    Good luck on your next adventure.

    --

    I only look human.
    My mother is a halfling and my dad is an ogre, so that makes me an Ogreling
  71. Length was not the problem for me by LordZardoz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The drawn out writing was not the big problem for me.

    What eventually turned me away from this series was the way it felt like I was reading someone else's teenage masturbatory fantasy. Think about it:

    - Main character had awe inspiring power which was corrupting him. Basic angst
    - Main character had an injury which caused constant pain. Instant angst.
    - Main character had 3 women who were in love with him and willing to share

    Aside from that, I do not like it when an author will spend 3 books building up a character as surprisingly powerful, and then throw out a one line "Yeah, we found this other person who is even stronger than X!".

    END COMMUNICATION

    1. Re:Length was not the problem for me by happyemoticon · · Score: 1

      The last bit sorta reminds you of Dragon Ball Z, doesn't it?

    2. Re:Length was not the problem for me by atamido · · Score: 1

      reminds you of Dragon Ball Z, doesn't it?

      Actually, that's exactly what it does. I thought of Dragon Ball Z after reading that he was dead. In Dragon Ball Z you think you know that absolute power of a character as some value N, except that the character discovers a way to make their power N+1, and defeat the bad guy. Each an every episode the character discovers a way to increment their maximum power by 1, just enough to defeat the bad guy, whose power increments by 1 each episode. (I guess if the bad guys power were ever incremented by 2, the good guy would die?) Power Rangers did the exact same thing. I never really liked either of those shows.

      The WoT series is just like that. For the first part of the series, in each book the main character (Rand) discovers a way to increase his power, which incidentally is just enough to defeat each new opponent. It got old, but I managed to make it all the way to the end of book 11 by listening to them while working out. Thinking about anything other than working out while working out is a good thing.

  72. I was worried about this... by Jythriadoc · · Score: 1

    I stopped reading this series when he started ressurrecting dead bad guys for this very reason. I had no confidence that he would ever finish before he died. I find myself strangely comforted that my decision was correct.

  73. A great seven book series ... cut short at eleven by Random+BedHead+Ed · · Score: 1

    I was really into these books for a few years, dutifully buying each new book in hardcover. I'd say it was great up until around book seven. The world was extremely well realized and Jordan left tantalizing clues as to what the world's past was like through the world's present cultures. So much history had been lost that there were deep mysteries Jordan kept hinting at. People had theories about the mythology, almost like people get obsessed about shows like Lost today (my take was always that the series took place in the distant future, and that the Age of Legends in the mythical past was actually our own high-tech utopian future). The series remained relatively consistent and culturally fascinating for many books, offering many revelations as Jordan peeled away the layers of the world one by one. At the culmination of one of the books a group of rebels finally laid siege to the corrupt Tar Valon, the Aes Sedai city ...

    ... and then the books suddenly collapsed. In the very next one, where you'd expect a battle to ensue, nothing happened. The rebel Aes Sedai waited around in their camp while laying siege to the city. And did the same in the next book. And the next one. After years of seeing major events unfold in each tome, suddenly Jordan became obsessed with the minutiae of minor characters he'd introduced relatively recently, while ignoring progress on the major events. And then he prolonged the agony by writing a prequel to the first book instead of another book in the series, and I gave up.

    I feel terribly that he died and wish the best for those who survived him, but I hope they leave this unfinished and just publish his notes or something to let us know what he was getting at all those years.

  74. um, yeah, devastating by msouth · · Score: 1

    this is devastating news to all of us who have been reading the series since 1990


    And also, maybe, to his family. What you meant to say is that the hearts of millions of grateful fans go out to his family, right?
    --
    Liberty uber alles.
    1. Re:um, yeah, devastating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this is devastating news to all of us who have been reading the series since 1990
      And also, maybe, to his family. What you meant to say is that the hearts of millions of grateful fans go out to his family, right?

      Not really. I'll bet, collectively, the geeks in this thread have spent more time reading his books and waiting for a conclusion to his stories than his family did actually spending time with him.

      Had he actually wrapped up anything in WoT, we'd all be a little more understanding. /aisle seat, please
    2. Re:um, yeah, devastating by msouth · · Score: 1

      Not really. I'll bet, collectively, the geeks in this thread have spent more time reading his books and waiting for a conclusion to his stories than his family did actually spending time with him.

      Had he actually wrapped up anything in WoT, we'd all be a little more understanding


      Look, if you're just going to reinforce the whole point of my argument, it's kind of deceptive to start out with "not really".
      --
      Liberty uber alles.
  75. Book 12 spoiler by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jordan dies.

  76. Most overrated fantasy author by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

    Tolkein's writing style wasn't for everyone, but Tolkein was arguably the first to create such an incredible fantasy world. Innovators always get considerably more points than the people who attempt to imitate them, all the while insisting imitation is better than original creation. Jordan was easily the most overrated fantasy author I ever knew, but I'm still sad to see him go.

    For years I joked that Jordan intentionally dragged his series out longer than he needed to, and he would die right before the last book was finished. Now I feel pretty shitty for the joke.

    I read the first six books, and everyone swore it was the greatest fantasy series ever. He threw in archetypical images from most every culture into a giant mish-mash with tons of side characters and side plots that rarely seemed to amount to anything, but the main plot was repetitive at best. Without spoiling anything too critical the plot of the first book is the protagonists being pursed. They go to one town, are attacked in the middle of the night (he writes continuosly how they never slept) hastily travel to another town, are attacked in the night, and hastily travel to another town, except this continues for 800 pages.

    The finale of each book is vague and anti-climactic, sometimes really completely absent from the book with the excuse that the main character passed out and didn't remember the conflict.

    The story is told third-person, so regardless of whether he passed out or not, you should still write the end of your books.

    I thought maybe it started to go somewhere at the end of book 3, but after reading 6 books at near 1,000 pages a pop, I couldn't believe how ultimately he hadn't told much of a story at all yet, while churning out the same crap. Then fans insisted the next 2 or three books were horrible, but they started to get better at book 9. I didn't intend to both ever again, and so I started with the joke. And 13 was the big number in the series, and for as long as I can recall the series was slated 13 books.

    I'm pretty sure he altered that huge master plan of his to wrap things up in 12 because of his illness, and now that remains unfinished. Robert Jordan was known to be full of himself, regularly compare himself to Tolkein, and regularly insist he was writing the most important work of fiction in history. His Conan work was pretty horrid, and trashed by even some of his biggest fans. The worst part is that if he hadn't been taking so much time between books doing side stuff like Conan, he probably could have churned out all 13 WoT books, and let history decide. Or maybe he could have told his story in a much shorter cycle, and not stretched needlessly for books.

    With all that being said, it is never a good die to see an author die so quickly from a disease, nor is it good for an audience to be now eternally tortured.

    The greatest irony is not that the series wasn't finished when Jordan died, but rather that for a man who wanted so very much to be Tolkein, he emulated him even in death. People seem to forget that Tolkein's work had to be finished after his death as well.

    --
    http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    1. Re:Most overrated fantasy author by the+grace+of+R'hllor · · Score: 1

      Point the first: The books start with the main characters being hunted. Of course there's going to be fights, and they're going to be flight. I'm sure you'd rather characters stayed in one place, not doing anything, such as Tolkien?

      Point the second: Tolkien was just a piss-poor story teller by today's standards. Horrid pacing, an aborted love interest that went nowhere (Why the fuck would you go for some soppy elf bint when you could have Eowyn, Aragorn?), and trying to get way *too* much backstory in the books. Awesome backstory, sure, set in an imaginative and intelligent world of wonder. But poorly told.

      Point the third: I do not recall the bits about main characters passing out and missing the end of the book, though I may be good for another re-read. I recall some hugely climactic endings.

      Point the fourth: The 'huge master plan' was originally six books. He sucked at keeping things short, mainly when he became succesful enough that publisher-appointed editors became an option instead of a requirement. He wanted to *avoid* 13 books, and he'd said so before he was diagnosed with his illness.

      He wrote fantasy of a clean variety (there is nastiness, but it's only done by capital-E Evil persons), in a complex and detailed world. His work is fully epic fantasy, and one of the best (as yet) uncompleted series out there.

      And we should both learn to not state our opinions as facts.

    2. Re:Most overrated fantasy author by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

      http://www.google.com/search?q=wheel+of+time+repetitive

      Search through the reviews of pretty much every WoT book out there, and the most consistent complaint you will hear is how repetitive they are.

      How many carbon-copy inns were in which Rand was attacked in the first book in the exact same circumstances?

      Is this world-class epic storytelling? Epic is not defined by page count, by the way.

      I'll take Eddings or Moorecock for the win.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    3. Re:Most overrated fantasy author by Dan+Hayes · · Score: 1

      And yet Tolkien can drag out travelling in the middle of bloody nowhere into an endless drear-fest. LoTR is one of the few fantasy series I've started and given up on, after getting through the first two books because I thought it had to be better than it was. I just didn't care what happened.

    4. Re:Most overrated fantasy author by the+grace+of+R'hllor · · Score: 1

      Eddings tells a good story, it must be said. Then he files off the serial numbers and tells the story again, this time set X years earlier/later.

      I've never read Moorecock. ("Moorecock than what?" you say. Ba-dum-ching)

      On that first page I see a reference to Hinduism (yes, reincarnation is repetitive), I see one review for the third book only, and some reviews of Crossroads of Twilight (which sucked ass). I do not feel the immense repetition of story that you seem to feel. That is not to say there isn't a lot of repetition in things like the description of dresses, arms folded under breasts, braids tugged and women sniffing, of course, but that's part of the style.

  77. Well.... by Cleon · · Score: 1

    On a serious note, my sympathies to his families, friends, and fans.

    On a not-so-serious note, if you lament the lack of new WoT books, just read the first four over and over again. It's like he's still there cranking out books. :)

    --
    Gifts for Geeks - Stuff that really matters!
  78. Opportunity by yada21 · · Score: 1

    If you take a good or many people think so book such as LoTR or WoTW and make a movie of it, people will complain that its not as good as the book.

    But if the book(s) are a bit below scratch the movie could be better! But it could be even worse too.

    --
    I will have a sig when the market demands it.
  79. Those of us sucked into Alan Dean Foster's by mrmeval · · Score: 1

    Pip and Flinx novels are getting antsy about him at least finishing the Pip and Flinx arc.

    I'd be even more offended if some 'friend' comes out of the closet to finish them over his rotting corpse.

    --
    I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
  80. Re:One of the bes by mrmeval · · Score: 1

    Blasphemer! Worship the dihydrogen monoxide!

    --
    I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
  81. Well, in all fairness by TheAxeMaster · · Score: 1

    King did warn you not to read it. I personally liked that story all the way through.

  82. RIP by mataal · · Score: 1

    sorry, but i just can't comment on RJs literary virtues (or lack thereof) on article with news of his death... Rest In Peace friend...

  83. Re:Kevin J Anderson and Brian Herbert by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Ahh, come on. There are neither beginnings nor endings to the "Wheel of Time" series...If you didn't figure that out by the 9th book, when he was STILL ADDING NEW GODDAMN CHARACTERS...

    I liked the first three a lot. I liked 4-6. I read 7 and 8. I read the last chapter of 9 and 10 just to keep track of what was going on. I didn't even read the last chapter of 11.

    There is a reason why there is no word other than "Series" to describe a collection of more than 6 books. You have GOT to wrap it up at some point.

    --
    ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
  84. This sucks ass by xiard · · Score: 1

    Shit shit shit shit goddamn bloody hell shit.

    I loved the Wheel of Time books...all of them. This was one of my favorite series. I loved the length and breadth of the stories. I loved the character development. I never thought of it as great literature, but I thought it was a great story. Anything can be critiqued, and the WoT series is no exception to that rule. But I loved it. Period.

    I think it's incredibly sad that he died before he could finish the series. And I admire the way he fought the disease and refused to give in to despair (at least based on the public face he portrayed).

    Xiard

    PS: I also love Orson Scott Card. He remains one of my favorite authors. I've seen a lot of (tangential) critique of his work on this thread. Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, so I won't suggest that those people are "wrong". I just wanted to voice my opinion that he think his work is generally fantastic, and I love the moral questions he raises. Maybe I'm just not discriminating enough...but the end result is that I get a lot of pleasure from reading his books, and I'm not going to argue with that or try to convince myself that I should hate them based on any of the criticisms I've read here.

  85. Not everyone is the same by DragonHawk · · Score: 1

    Reading a lot of the comments for this article, the thought that occurs to me most often is that many here (on all sides of the various issues) would stand to remember that not everyone is the same. Some people love the whole series, others though it started off strong but then lost its way, others couldn't get past page three of book one. Some people find humor and death are perfectly appropriate together, others think such is the lowest of low blows. People should stop assuming that just because someone doesn't think the same way you do, it's a personal attack on you or yours.

    I find "The Robustness Principle" applies to human interactions as well: Be conservative in what you do, and liberal in what you accept.

    (My personal opinions (unlikely anyone cares, but in the interests of full disclosure): I thought "The Eye of the World" was fantastic, with the alluded-to backstory appearing fabulously rich. I thought the series had the makings of the next major fantasy classic. But after that, I felt WoT quickly developed problems with pacing and repetitiveness, and lost interest around book three and stopped reading at the end of book five. My opinion. I also enjoy gallows humor, and I often cope with grief and stress by cracking jokes, so I laughed at the humor here. That is also part of my personality, and I do not demand that others be the same as me.)

    --

    dragonhawk@iname.microsoft.com
    I do not like Microsoft. Remove them from my email address.
    1. Re:Not everyone is the same by speaker+of+the+truth · · Score: 1

      Some people find humor and death are perfectly appropriate together, others think such is the lowest of low blows I did not detect any humor in the parent's comment.
      --
      Using openSUSE instead of Windows since 9th of October, 2007 and liking it.
  86. I'll sure miss him by das3cr · · Score: 1

    Jordan's stories are wonderful IMO. RJ is also a decorated combat vet. RIP old friend.

    "As a soldier it's always better to be tried by twelve, than carried by six."

    --
    Hurricane Island Outward Bound
    OB
  87. Re:Kevin J Anderson and Brian Herbert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Frank Herbert was WELL into raping the series once he moved on.

    Anything that happened after the one with the emperor sandworm of ages was total shit.

    The prequels were actually kind of fun, if you weren't expecting exactly the same thing as before (if you were, you're a dumbass).

  88. Zeno's Paradox by Valdrax · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I've read a few interviews where he said that the ending had basically been written for years...

    My friends who read the WoT series and I always had a theory that he'd written the ending years ago, and that in some strange, literary mockery of Zeno's Paradox, he just wrote the plot half-way there each time he churned out a new book.

    It certainly seemed like some sort of plot time-dilation was happening in the last few books by their accounts.

    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    1. Re:Zeno's Paradox by Kelson · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It certainly seemed like some sort of plot time-dilation was happening in the last few books by their accounts.

      Books 6 through book 10, certainly, but things really started to move toward the conclusion in the most recent one. He resolved a number of plot threads that had been hanging around for as long as 5 books, and was clearly moving pieces in place for the endgame.

    2. Re:Zeno's Paradox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Books 6 through book 10, certainly, but things really started to move toward the conclusion in the most recent one.

      After absolutely nothing happened in Book 10 (I recall it actually started before then end of book 9, and didn't seem to get much further), I think he finally started to fear a fan revolt. Or maybe he suddenly realized he was closer to death than he thought. I came very close to not buying book 11, but it was on sale and I was desperate for reading material...

    3. Re:Zeno's Paradox by ggwood · · Score: 1

      At some point, it's no longer about telling a story. It's more about living in a world. I stopped at book six but I am curious how the whole thing turns out.

      --
      a war on terrorism? How can we end a war on a method?
    4. Re:Zeno's Paradox by LordNightwalker · · Score: 1

      Stephen King did the same with The Gunslinger; books 1-3 were brilliant; book 4 lost momentum, and then he took a long break. Years later he finally rushed out the last couple of installments in the series in record time, but the quality of storytelling wasn't the same as with the first 3 books.

      Let's hope WoT doesn't await the same fate...

      --
      Install windows on my workstation? You crazy? Got any idea how much I paid for the damn thing?
    5. Re:Zeno's Paradox by Arancaytar · · Score: 1

      things really started to move toward the conclusion in the most recent one.


      As if he anticipated it being the second to last...?
    6. Re:Zeno's Paradox by abb3w · · Score: 1

      My friends who read the WoT series and I always had a theory that he'd written the ending years ago, and that in some strange, literary mockery of Zeno's Paradox, he just wrote the plot half-way there each time he churned out a new book.

      Well, he's had it plotted out for years, but he's been making progress, especially since his doctors delivered the news of God's little death threat against him.

      The real "Zeno's Paradox" series is GRRM's "Song of Ice and Fire."
      I have hardcovers of all four of the books out so far.
      All four claim that the next volume will be "A Dance With Dragons".
      He's now working on book five... "A Dance With Dragons."

      Mind you, I'm still waiting with cash in hand....

      --
      //Information does not want to be free; it wants to breed.
  89. Re:Kevin J Anderson and Brian Herbert by spun · · Score: 3, Funny

    Obviously, in Robert Jordan's case, you do NOT need to wrap it up. You can keep stringing people along until you pass away. You've got more stamina than I do, I stopped reading by book seven. It's not even the interminable and unchanging plots, it's his amateur command of the English language. I read one too many sentences describing a woman smoothing the front of her damn dress, flipped out, through book seven against a wall and haven't looked back.

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
  90. Eh. by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 1

    Agreed wrt Eddings...I read enough of his work to find it repetitive, and then went back over the older stuff, and was amazed at how pat it was. It definitely speaks to a younger audience.

    Martin is interesting, and his scope is epic, and his tone is adult. I never really got hooked on the series though. Not enough characters that I really enjoyed.

    Brooks is kind of a must-read if you're into fantasy epics...Certainly one of the big names. I'm not going to rhapsodize about the works, because they aren't all that, but they're original and interesting, with good tone and interesting settings. It's harder to read as an adult, however (similar to Eddings).

    Bujold has made a recent foray into fantasy, and while the current "Sharing Knife" series doesn't thrill me, the three previous books (Curse of Chalion, Paladin of Souls, and Hallowed Hunt) were some of the best fantasy I've read in a very long time...Her sci-fi is top notch as well.

    Terry Pratchett has grown on me as well; I read the first few discworld books when they came out and was unimpressed, but I got back into them later, and the last 10 or so have been phenomenal, and, better still, while related, they all stand alone.

    --
    ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
  91. That does not compute by Valdrax · · Score: 1

    The WOT was one of the best series ever, for most of its run. Though I have to admit, I did give up on it a few books back, when I realized it took nearly the whole next book for me to get back up to speed on the myriad subplots, and that the series was progressing more and more slowly each book.

    How can a series be one of the best series ever if it makes you give up part-way through it? Do you regularly abandon good series without finishing them?

    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
  92. Terry Goodkind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who will Terry Goodkind rip off now?

  93. Re:Kevin J Anderson and Brian Herbert by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 1

    Yea, I held on just in the hopes that he would wrap it up, though I stopped enjoying anything at 5, I believe. And the language I could handle, though the Eddings-esque character-typing, where you know the default reaction of every character to every situation by about the 4th book, was seriously annoying. All the women acted one way, all the men acted another way. The men never understood the women, the women never understood the men, blah blah blah hilarity fails to ensue.

    But when he starts adding wildly unnecessary characters in book 6 and 7, that basically said to me, "Hi, I'm never going to wrap anything up, EVER! Ha! Sucker!"

    I'll even admit to a grim chuckle when I found out he was diagnosed with a terminal disease...I don't wish him ill or anything, but stringing out a series that far, just because you can...Well, you're courting nonsense like this. And all the diehard fans, who bought your work eternally, and waded through entire books that didn't hardly advance the plot at all...Well, you screwed 'em. Hard core.

    --
    ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
  94. Dry? Boring? Hard to read? by __aailob1448 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    How dare you say that Tolkien didn't know how to tell a story? Are you insane?

    I love good stories. I've read books, watched movies and tv shows, listened to my grandmother's tales and a good story is a good story. You know it's good because it takes you to another place and you cherish the experience when it's over, period.

    Tolkien does this better than the vast majority of published storytellers.

    It's a pity you were never able to finish his books and I understand that writing style can turn people off (it happens to all of us) but what you claim is preposterous. Next time, just say you don't like his writing style.

    1. Re:Dry? Boring? Hard to read? by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 1

      I love good stories. I've read books, watched movies and tv shows, listened to my grandmother's tales and a good story is a good story. You know it's good because it takes you to another place and you cherish the experience when it's over, period.

      Agreed. Don't we all love those stories?

      Tolkien does this better than the vast majority of published storytellers.

      However, I disagree with this.

      Next time, just say you don't like his writing style.

      You can say that about any poorly written book. At what point do you not apologize for the guy? Look, I admire the plot and scope of the books. But I don't buy that it was necessary to be so ponderous and dull so often in his writing. I've read thousands and thousands of books in my life, and there have only been a handful of times that I couldn't finish a book that I really wanted to finish.

      Hell, I'm a huge fan of Michener's work, and lord knows he takes a long time to set up his plots. So I'm not impatient, I'm willing to cut an author some slack. But never has any writing felt like wading through molasses like Tolkien.

      A great book should also flow such that the words never get in the way.

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    2. Re:Dry? Boring? Hard to read? by atamido · · Score: 1

      Look, I admire the plot and scope of the books. But I don't buy that it was necessary to be so ponderous and dull so often in his writing.

      Tolkien's writing can have parts that are a bit ponderous to read through (I've never actually finished The Silmarillion). However I did read The Hobbit and the LOTR in fourth grade, and my brother read The Hobbit in second. I would have been nine then, and I recall liking them very much, though I wonder now how much I may have simply not caught.

      To be fair though, Tolkien was introducing a heck of a lot of concepts to people, and he was a linguist. Most of the ideas that we have for elves and dwarfs were developed and popularized by his writing. Remember, before this most people probably said that elves were tiny little beings that worked in shoe shops or the north pole. If he hadn't spent so much time describing these things in detail, nobody would have had a clue what they were supposed to be. Essentially everything in it needed to be explained in some detail. Now that everyone has read those books or become familiar with the ideas, authors can simply refer to them and we understand them. Tolkien didn't have that luxury.

      Also, Tolkien was fascinated with languages. For some people they add something, for most people they don't. What it boils down to is he loved thinking about and inventing languages, it was his passion, and that is reflected in his writing. Personally I think he went a little overboard, but I don't feel it puts to big of a burden on the reader.

      Jordan apparently has a fascination with clothing (particularly dresses) and scenery. I would guess that at least 1/10th of most of his books are dedicated to describing in great detail what people are wearing. Yes, I understand that people like to wear clothing the color that represents the organization they are a member of. But why must you describe the particular shade, hems, and style of embroidery on each and every dress in a group of women? Why?!? Also, if you say something is a snow capped mountain, I understand what that looks like. There is no need to describe every mountain a character passes in great detail to the reader.

      I'm fairly certain that a person cannot be counted as a character in one of Jordan's books without devoting at least a paragraph to their hair is combed. Seriously.

  95. Too much detail by phorm · · Score: 1

    Well, both part of the charm and the frustration to the details of Jordan's writing is the insane amount of detail given to the characters and environment. In terms of character development, it makes them very human, however sometimes it goes to the point that you've pretty much devoted 5-10+ pages to the fact that Rand had eggs for breakfast this morning... poached... with butter, etc.

    Detail is good, too much can lead to a bit of drag, especially when you're devoting almost half a book in cases to filling in small parts of the plot (with little action). Often enough, many authors will do what has been suggested elsewhere under this article: make a spin-off series with a prequel, or with a more detailed look at a particular persona/plot-segment.

  96. I have never understood his popularity. by Fyzzler · · Score: 1

    I picked up his first book at a used book store around 1992 or so. It was around about 1000+ pages long, I read the first 450 pages, and not a damn thing happened, just like a Stephen King novel. His prose was just like Nora Robert's, (i.e. complete schlock). I stopped reading less than halfway through the first book. I don't like Nora Roberts or Stephen King and put Jordan in the same pop category as those two.

    He seemed to ascribe to the theory, "Why use 5 words to describe something, when 35 words can be used instead?". I thought then, with his very first book, that he was being paid by the publisher per page, not per book. My wife actually finished this first book, because one of her friends absolutely raved about the series. She didn't much care for it either, even after reading the whole book.

    I just don't understand why people liked him. I don't understand why people like Nora Roberts either, for that matter. Stephen King, on the otherhand, I can understand people liking, but I will only bother to read the Reader's Digest condensed versions of King, or just wait for the movie. :)

    --
    I have one question. If the Japanese Ministry of Agriculture is not in charge of Gundam, then who is?
  97. Tad Williams by gambolt · · Score: 1

    He's even more long winded and also writes chapters which must be intended to be read out of order.

  98. On RJ's blog by Vexor · · Score: 1

    It was stated on his blog awhile back that RJ disclosed the entire story to his with and cousin. So with his notes and them knowing the story it will most likely be finished. http://www.dragonmount.com/RobertJordan/ The site is down currently (no doubt due to his passing)

    --
    ~Vexed and loving it!
  99. Ouch... by Greyfox · · Score: 1
    I stopped reading around book 4 or 5 when I started to realize that each book was pretty much the same thing over and over again. I was kind of hoping to pick up the entire series once he was done with it, though. I was kind of looking forward to taking 2 weeks off and slogging through 30 books. Not like I had much else to do since Zelazny died.

    Oh well, so it goes, I guess...

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  100. Agreed by sheldon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I bought The Eye of the World in hard cover when it was first released. I'd read some of his prior works, Conan stories and so on and liked his writing. Each year, I'd wait for that next book and buy it hard cover the first week it appeared on the shelves.

    The first three books were incredible. Then I read four and five, and grew disenchanted. Waiting for the books, then finding out he wasn't wrapping up threads but rather further expanding.

    Finally I bought book six, got about half way through and then just quit. I couldn't take it any more.

    I'm sorry to see him pass away, but I never understood what he was trying to accomplish with this series. It had such potential, and then was just pissed away. Sad. I wonder if we'll ever know why, or what he had intended.

  101. Rest in Peace by mdarksbane · · Score: 1

    The Light shine on you and the Creator shelter you. The last embrace of the mother welcome you home.

  102. Re:Kevin J Anderson and Brian Herbert by geekwithsoul · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I have to agree on his amateurish writing -- I'll put up with a lot from a book if the story is great and the writing is not, or the reverse, but his books lacked both. That's not to say the idea and concepts that were the basis of the story weren't great, he just didn't have the skills to bring off his vision. A number of my friends were fans of the first 3 or 4 books, and they harangued me into reading them, but like others who posted here, I basically read the last chapter of 9 and 10 and didn't read 11 at all.

    Hopefully a good writer like L.E. Modesitt or someone else (please, no hack writers!) will be asked to complete the last book in the series and give it the treatment that Robert Jordan couldn't. I'm sorry he passed away without finishing it, not because I wanted to read it, but more so because he was obviously so invested in bringing it to completion.

  103. Earthsea by Kelson · · Score: 1

    I'm currently re-reading Earthsea for the 4th or 5th time. I highly recommend the original trilogy. They're written in the 1970s, so they're relatively short, and these days you'd probaly see the entire trilogy as one novel.

    The later books are vastly different. They sort of have to be, since book 4 was written 15 years after the original trilogy, and the next two books a decade after that. Tehanu is neither adventure story nor travelogue, but an examination of the implications of what we see in the trilogy. My last re-read was around the time that Tales from Earthsea and The Other Wind came out, so I've only read each of them once, and I'm currently about a chapter into the first story in Tales. I do remember not liking The Other Wind as much on first read, thinking it retread the themes of The Farthest Shore too much, but I'm interested in seeing how I react on a second read.

  104. Memory of Light WILL Happened by 9InchRails · · Score: 1
    For those of you who worry that they won't get to read MOL, rest assured the Truth is Out There. From his blog, which is currently slashdotted:

    Rumors and rumors of rumors
    Posted by Wilson on September 9th, 2007 in the Robert Jordan's Blog category
    During Dragon Conn in Atlanta last week rumors flew about that my brother/cousin was gravely ill, wasn't eating and had in fact had "Last Rites" administered. I just got off the telephone with him and he's surrounded by laughing friends and relatives and is about to enjoy a shrimp-based bowl of gumbo. He got a chuckle out of news of his impending departure.

    Go back and reread RJ's blog entries and you'll know exactly what is going on. Armed with those medical facts, if any of you have shared time with very ill relatives you'll know what person looked like and felt like during the ordeal. RJ looks and feels just like that. So, we're not taking any family photos at the moment.

    Fact: He is ill, very ill. He has shared that with you in medical jargon. He has told you the prognosis of his physicians and told you that he plans to beat their predictions. I pray that he will. But should it not be in the cards, he'll manage that phase of his life as he has every step he has taken thus far. So, should you hear another "rumor" it's just that. Until you hear it from RJ, Harriet or from me, it's just a rumor.

    Fact: He's told you that his appetite comes and goes. It does. He's taking a handful of medications everyday to help him in the fight. Unfortunately some of them have adverse affects on the appetite. Pretty much like a kid in that regard right now. He eats when he feels up to it, and says "No Thanks!" when he doesn't. When I visited a couple of weeks back he had a hankering for Cream of Mushroom soup served with rice and a dash of tabasco. RJ and Harriet were busy in the parlor, so I whipped up the soup. He told me it was good, but not as good as when Harriet prepares it. Duh!?!?

    Fact: The deacon from his church visits their home for weekly worship services and to bring communion. RJ doesn't feel up to sitting on two hundred year old wooden pews for an hour. Painful even for someone in the peak of health, which you know RJ is not. These visits are to share communion, which is a weekly (at least) part of RJ and Harriet's lives. Same goes for Janet and me. When RJ is physically stronger, he'll be back on the hard pews. I hope that whatever your faith that you are able to "Commune" with God often.

    Bottom line guys, he's been completely forthcoming with you from the very beginning of this ordeal. He intends to continue that dialog. When he and I spoke a few minutes ago, I asked if he wanted to end this rumor or for me to do it? I then reminded him that the last time he wrote you he was feeling as he put it "a bit viperish" and that his posting had kicked over a huge ant hill. He allowed that perhaps I should write you guys this time. Calmer heads and all.

    Keep the prayer lines open please. He's a stubborn old cuss but welcomes, appreciates, yes even needs your collective petitions to our God. I'll be seeing RJ and Harriet in a week and will give them a hug and an "I Love You" from each and every one of you.

    Thanks for caring.

    Peace be with each of you,

    Wilson
    Brother/Cousin
    4th of 3

    Epilog: Yes he is continuing to work through all of this medical calamity. MOL is going into the word processor and onto audio tapes almost daily. Not every day mind you, because the medical fight takes first priority. But, he told you he'd finish and he will. Fact is that it has been finished in his head for years. During a recent family sit around, he became the Gleeman and told the bones of it ALL to Harriet and me. You read that right, I did say ALL. Don't ask, ain't telling. Two and a half hours of story telling by the Creator himself went by in the twinkling of an eye. Truly magical. All I can say is WOW! Best stuff he's ever done. MOL is going to knock your socks off! That's a promise.
  105. Like his characters... by jbischof · · Score: 1

    I was still angry at him for killing off so many great main characters that had such potential. In his ultimate act of frustrating the reader, I think he intentionally died while writing his last book. He refuses to give any satisfaction to the reader except to point out that life is short and you can't always get what you want.

    He was a great author that will be missed.

  106. Anecdotes Are Not Evidence by EgoWumpus · · Score: 1

    My respects to the late departed; I feel genuinely bad that, for years, I've panned the guy. I never liked his books. I read the first one, found it incredibly bad, and tried to no avail to get through the second. I think his work is overly derivative and trite, lacking much subtlety of characterization. I think, in fact, it reflects quite well the lack of real socialization of most people who were attracted to it - but that is my (humble) opinion.

    I don't begrudge that you enjoyed the book. Nor your friends. But not everyone thought it was wonderful. I genuinely feel bad that I've ripped into Jordan as an author, especially after Martin - who is, by contrast, in my (humble) opinion an excellent fantasy author - gave him such a sweet remembrance. Nevertheless, simply because some set of people enjoyed the books do not make them good. In my observation, they failed to be enjoyable. In many others, this seems to be true, too. In yet others, it seems false. So, no, they're not universally enjoyable - even if they are enjoyable to some.

    --

    [Ego]out

    1. Re:Anecdotes Are Not Evidence by bigstrat2003 · · Score: 1

      Quite true, sir. I don't mean to claim that they're universally enjoyable, but my claim is that, since they aren't universally reviled either (quite a few people loved the books), the man did succeed at making enjoyable books. After all, even Tolkien's work isn't universally loved, but few would claim he failed to make enjoyable books.

      --
      "16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
  107. Not George RR Martin by jbischof · · Score: 1

    Wait! I was thinking of George RR Martin, nevermind. This post is officially rescinded.

  108. Tolkien by EgoWumpus · · Score: 1

    I know I'm not alone in finding his writing unbearable.

    Nor are you in the majority.

    --

    [Ego]out

  109. A sad day. by Shadmere · · Score: 1

    I do admit that the books fell in quality for awhile. Book seven wasn't great, and book eight was almost just bad. Nine wasn't terrible, though, and I honestly thought books ten and eleven were very good. I was excited while reading Knife of Dreams, and that's the mark of a good book; one that excites you.

    Of course people will have different opinions. If you think that every book after five was terrible, then you think that. If you hate the entire series, then fine. That's your opinion. But don't speak for everyone else, and remember that regardless of whether or not the books were good, a man died. He brought happiness to a great many people, even if it wasn't everyone.

    I do hope his wife is ok.

  110. Incredulity by EgoWumpus · · Score: 1

    I've read thousands and thousands of books in my life, and there have only been a handful of times that I couldn't finish a book that I really wanted to finish.

    A book a day for three years will get you a thousand. Thousands and thousands you say? So... a book a day for, what, twelve years? Fifteen? What do you do for a living? Are you independently wealthy? Because, frankly, I find it unlikely that you've read that many books in twelve years. Four books a week, perhaps, seems more reasonable. That's 200 a year, or a thousand every decade, and a lean four thousand in forty years.

    What is my point? That regardless of the numbers, or whatever reading prowess you have, you're puffing yourself up for the sake of an argument - giving yourself an authority (I've read thousands and thousands of books! I know!) that, even if it's deserved, is beside the point. You've never read writing that felt like wading through molasses like Tolkien? Ever read Cervantes? "A Brief History of England"? Any organic chemistry book? Or any of the thousands of published authors who, in fact, are worse writers than Tolkien? If you have the authority you claim, you'd never put Tolkien at the bottom. And the authority is a stretch, so I am forced to come to the conclusion that you don't actually have a useful observation on the issue.

    --

    [Ego]out

    1. Re:Incredulity by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 1

      Because, frankly, I find it unlikely that you've read that many books in twelve years.

      "Thousands and thousands" might make it sound exaggerated, if I had to pin a number on it, I'd say probably 2,000 books. I'm 42 years old. I used to read a *LOT* of books, and I read fairly fast (60-80 pages an hour, not the fastest, but a reasonable clip). So I can easily whip out a typical paperback book in an evening. I've actually not read nearly as much the last 10 years (once I got married and had kids -- go figure). So between, say, age 15 and 32 was probably my highest output. At one time, around age 25, I counted 1,200 books in my personal library. I've bought a lot since then, and I used to check out a lot of books from the library. Unfortunately, I lost the majority of my library in a flooded house, and I've gotten rid of a lot as well. Still have big bookcases full, though.

      So figure 1,900 books between 15 and 32 -- 17 years. That's 111 / year, or 2.1 per week. Not exactly that difficult to imagine. Heck, thinking about that average, it might be more than 2K. A few years ago I read the Hornblower series in about a week and a half, that's 11 books right there.

      You've never read writing that felt like wading through molasses like Tolkien? Ever read Cervantes? "A Brief History of England"? Any organic chemistry book? Or any of the thousands of published authors who, in fact, are worse writers than Tolkien? If you have the authority you claim, you'd never put Tolkien at the bottom.

      First of all, I'm speaking of fiction (I haven't read Cervantes). I don't necessarily put Tolkien at the bottom in terms of literary "value", I put him near the bottom in terms of readability. There are lots of bad authors that I've managed to get through -- bad plots, bad grammar, bad characters. Hell, Larry Niven, as good as his ideas are, wouldn't know a character if the cardboard hit him on the head. But his books are *readable*.

      Tolkien's prose is heavy and ponderous. Obviously there are people who manage to get through it, but it just defeats me. I simply don't like having to work that hard, no matter how cool the world is. I reject the idea that his books have to be that way. You seem to think that Tolkien has no flaws, but *every* author has flaws in some way. Heinlein was preachy and often ridiculously sexist. Etc, etc.

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    2. Re:Incredulity by EgoWumpus · · Score: 1

      Of course Tolkien has his flaws, but they in no way outstrip his talents. I would far sooner level the complaint that his characters are not, in fact, really characters so much as archetypes (but even this is reflects the genre he was really writing for; epics in the classical sense) than that his writing was ponderous. (I actually have no problem with heavy writing; it has great value.) Far too many authors fall into the 'impossibly ponderous' category; Nathaniel Hawthorne leaps to mind, Cervantes as mentioned before, Conrad and even the late Jordan. And to top it off, I think that in Tolkien's case, he had good cause to write as he did; I don't think the style of writing in any way reflects poorly on him as an author. Rather, it shows his sensitivity not only to the appropriate style for what he wished to accomplish, but also his own talents.

      --

      [Ego]out

  111. Pratchett and Bujold by geek2k5 · · Score: 1

    Ah! Another Pratchett and Bujold fan.


    My family has most of the Disc World books as well as all of the Miles Vorkosigan series. We reread them frequently, especially after each new book arrives. The characters are like distant relatives that we care about but can't visit often enough.


    Both series could be considered addictive IF you like the genres. (We prefer them to main line fiction, which is depressing and predictable in our opinion.)

  112. The Very Definition of Literature by EgoWumpus · · Score: 1

    It is, in fact, the very definition of literature when each time you go back to a story, you find something new and awe-inspiring about it. Tolkien had that, I think, and I suspect that by and large the people who fail to recognize that are, themselves, limited or otherwise crippled in their understanding and knowledge of the world.

    --

    [Ego]out

  113. Why is fantasy so bloody long? by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

    I'm a casual fan of fantasy though I've usually stayed more on the scifi side of the divide. The thing I never understood, why do fantasy books always have to be giant doorstops and trilogies at minimum? Whatever happened to just writing something good and solid and wrapping it up nicely? I liked Raymond E. Feist's fantasy. Got into it as a kid and was stoked. I reread the original Riftwar series a few years back. While it wasn't as immensely gobsmackingly awesome as when I was 14, I think it structurally holds up. Beginning, middle, end, soundly executed. His stuff really started falling apart with Serpentwar and the dirty dozen rip-off. I don't think I've read anything by him since. Oh, and the Empire series was good, that was written with Janny Wurts and came before the Serpentwar crap.

    It seems like an inevitable literary law: the longer a series runs for, the crappier it will be. The better the original book, the greater the disappointment in the end. And what really gets me, these books are stretched out for ages with nothing but filler! How can anyone write a thousand pages with action only occurring on three of them? The Honor Harrington series is guilty of that. The last one of those I read, a revolution happened that had been hinted about occurring for previous books and it all happened off-screen! Then there's the deterioration that was Dune, going from three good novels to a sea of crap, and that's before Kevin J. Anderson got his meathooks on it.

    Sorry to hear we lost a writer but damn, if he hadn't stretched the whole fucking series out to infinity and beyond, he might have managed to finish it in time.

    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
  114. For those worrying about how the series will end by dodobh · · Score: 1

    Don't worry, the wheel of time will keep on turning, and in a new age, which some men will call the third age, Robert Jordan will be reborn and finally finish the series.

    --
    I can throw myself at the ground, and miss.
  115. Short stories by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

    There is an entire industry around short stories. They tend to be much better executed than the big long doorstops, and when they aren't, no loss because you only spent 20 minutes reading the thing. Plenty of subscription based magazines if you like SF/Fantasy short stories (I like "Analog", but there are a few others).

    The disadvantage to short stories is that you won't be able to enjoy the same characters over and over again, the advantage is you won't be subjected to the same characters over and over again.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    1. Re:Short stories by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

      There is an entire industry around short stories. They tend to be much better executed than the big long doorstops, and when they aren't, no loss because you only spent 20 minutes reading the thing. Plenty of subscription based magazines if you like SF/Fantasy short stories (I like "Analog", but there are a few others).

      The disadvantage to short stories is that you won't be able to enjoy the same characters over and over again, the advantage is you won't be subjected to the same characters over and over again. When I was a kid I'd buy up back issues of Asimov and Analog and I got a subscription when I was in college. I just don't have the time to keep up with a routine periodical anymore. I think it would be great if we could do an online subscription, have the full back catalog available and browse all the old stories. The infrastructure is certainly available, Baen has been doing the free library thing, but the only way to toss some cash in the kitty is still buying paper books. I figure we'll have this hashed out eventually.

      While I hate the big brother aspect of data mining, I do like the recommendations that can be dug up. When the first p2p apps came out, some of them let you browse the share folders of other users. I found some great music by association that way. Later sites like Amazon are good for giving genre recommendations and the user-generated "best of" lists are also helpful. Separating wheat from chaff is getting easier. The thought of going into a used bookstore without a shopping list in hand seems dicier and dicier.
      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
  116. Being dead by SteveFoerster · · Score: 1

    if you can't take a joke at your own expense then being dead is the least of your worries.

    Your call, but personally I'd rather have a bad sense of humor and be alive.

    --
    Space game using normal deck of cards: http://BattleCards.org
  117. Re:Kevin J Anderson and Brian Herbert by nuzak · · Score: 1

    > Bastard. Now I'll never know how it ends.

    You know, I think there's some justice in leaving the readers hanging forever, being that they're the ones that funded Jordan's descent into filler that was just milking the series for the benjamins. Something of a lesson in what you get when you let someone delay your gratification forever.

    On the other hand, it might be even greater justice to just do it half-assed, like oh, all of books 5-10.

    --
    Done with slashdot, done with nerds, getting a life.
  118. Don't think WoT is good? See if you can do better by Xentor · · Score: 1

    I'm not one to mourn the dead. When a movie star or a musician dies, I usually just shrug and don't care much. Yeah, I'm heartless like that. But writers, well, I have a special respect for them.

    Aside from being a programmer, I'm an amateur writer (One day I'll get my first novel published), and from the perspective of an aspiring author, the WoT series is just amazing. From a technical point of view, think of the number of characters and subplots he managed to keep afloat, all interacting and twisting in unexpected ways.

    Some of you complain that he was too wordy. I agree somewhat, but what I've found is that there's a sort of balance you need to find when writing a story of this sort. If the action moves too fast, then people start to miss things, and the story might look amateurish because it lacks detail. If it moves too slow, then you get the kind of comments I've spent my lunch hour reading here. In my own novel, I think I'm leaning a bit to the other side, but that's beside the point.

    Sorry if this is wordy (Great, now I'm falling into the trap), but I'm trying to figure out how to properly describe it. Here, think of a horror movie... A good one, if you can find one... Would it really be interesting if it was nothing but constant action? The guy walks into the house, and you just cut to two seconds before the monster jumps out at him. We don't really need to see him (Well, more likely "her") creeping through the house, one step at a time, checking a few rooms only to find absolutely nothing... Wait, you DO need that! Because no one wants to see one battle after another after another. You need the slow parts to accent the fast parts...

    Ah hell, maybe I'm dead wrong about this. I'm no great author or filmmaker. I just hate to see people bashing one of my favorite writers (Along with Donaldson, Pohl, Asimov, and Anthony)...

    So, sad to see him go, and sad to see the series interrupted... Book #11 will have to sit on my shelf, unread, until I see what happens next...

    --
    "The amount of intelligence on this planet is a constant. The population is growing." -Cole's Axiom
  119. So, farewell then by E.J.Thribb · · Score: 0

    So. Farewell then, Robert Jordan.
    Your books gave many
    people
    pleasure.

    Though some did not like them.

    You were also a baseball player
    and a kind of shoe.

    Not many can claim that.

    Sorry for being late.
    Though not in the sense that you are, obviously.

    --
    (Age 17 1/2)
  120. Re:Kevin J Anderson and Brian Herbert by spun · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The thing that pissed me off the most is that his ideas were really good, and he had the capacity to create decent plots. But he kept stringing us along and his plots went to hell, and then there was basically nothing because his character development and skill as a wordsmith are seriously lacking.

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
  121. Re:Kevin J Anderson and Brian Herbert by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 1

    You know how WoT ends. RJ was kind enough to include it in the first book.

    It's a wheel. There are no beginnings in the Wheel of Time.

    --

    ---
    ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
  122. Re:Kevin J Anderson and Brian Herbert by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 1

    Yea, I thought a lot of his ideas were very clever, very original...But that was quickly swamped by the sheer quantity of prose. For the first three books, which were very dense, you could hold out hope for an actual resolution...It really seemed like he was pushing toward something.

    The ending of book three however, and the beginning of book four dashed those hopes. The only thing that kept me going past that was Matt, and as he became a less significant character I became less interested overall.

    Rand never grabbed me as a protagonist. The "reluctant hero" archetype can only be played for so long before the hero has to man up and take some responsibility...Rand never did that (in any book I read)...The closest he came was trying to be what he thought a hero ought to be, and that's not the same at all.

    --
    ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
  123. Final book in the series my... by Tofflos · · Score: 1

    "Jordan was in the process of writing the twelfth and final book in the Wheel of Time series."

    BWAAAaahahaha! The FINAL book in the series? I think we've all given up the idea that there would ever be a final book.

  124. Re:Kevin J Anderson and Brian Herbert by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

    Hopefully a good writer... will be asked to complete the last book.

    Alan Dean Foster?

    --
    I drank what? -- Socrates
  125. Re:Kevin J Anderson and Brian Herbert by knewter · · Score: 1

    It seems a bit silly to have 'throughn' the book against the wall due to someone ELSE'S lack of command of the english language.

    Now, repeat: threw. threw. threw. threw.

    There ya go...

    --
    -knewter
  126. Re:Kevin J Anderson and Brian Herbert by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1

    Don't even start me on how many women were described as being "plumply pretty". What was he, a chubby-chaser?

  127. Some people just don't get it by DragonHawk · · Score: 1

    I did not detect any humor in the parent's comment.

    I wrote that not everyone is the same. That not everyone thinks the same way. So you are either stating the blindingly obvious (that you are one of the many people who do not find gallows humor funny), or you just do not grasp what I am saying (that not everyone thinks the same way you do). Either way, you are doing nothing productive.

    --

    dragonhawk@iname.microsoft.com
    I do not like Microsoft. Remove them from my email address.
  128. Ack! by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 1

    Fuck! David Gemmell is dead? Now THAT is a fucking tragedy. How the hell did I miss that?

    You've spoiled the ironic amusement I felt at RJ's death...I knew he'd pull something off to avoid finishing the series. That's why I stopped reading it...A decade ago.

    I read all the same people you read, but alas, my enjoyment of them has dimmed since I was younger. Williams has held up best, in my mind, followed by McCaffrey and Brooks. I never liked Goodkind (always viewed him as a Robert Jordan rip-off, actually), and Eddings, who I would have put near the top once...After you've read enough of his work, it all pales.

    --
    ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    1. Re:Ack! by merchant_x · · Score: 1

      I'm so glad some one finally mentioned williams. _Memory, Sorrow, and Thorn_ is probably my favorite fantasy series of all time.

    2. Re:Ack! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't much care for Goodkind, now, either.
      I loved Wizard's First Rule but the rest in the series were pathetically formulaic.

    3. Re:Ack! by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 1

      Wizards First Rule was the only one I read...

      To be fair, I was suspicious of him at first (anyone else suspicious of fantasy authors who skip paperback?), and didn't read it until it had been out for a few years...I was looking for reasons dislike him, and I found plenty.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
  129. I got the first WOT book when I was 12 or 13.... by Vampyre_Dark · · Score: 1

    Now I'm 25 and I still haven't read it. I tried a few times and never even got to the halfway point, having given up out of boredom and apathy. 100 pages to tell me that a guy in a hood is following them on a horse through the woods, and a monster is standing outside their cabin.

    This is not a knock on Jordan. Several people have told me how great the series was.

  130. Hmm by goldcd · · Score: 1

    Seemingly it only rated as mediocre humour, but I can live with it.
    Following on your second point - I have no soul and am bemused as to why the dead require respect.
    Lots of people die. In fact it's one of those things that most of us seem to end up suffering from at one time or another - in fact along with population growth it seems to definitely be on the rise, but I digress. The reason Robert Jordan made it onto slashdot was that people liked buying his books and therefore is granted greater presence than the rest of us few mortals. Flipside of that is that I feel entirely entitled to attempt a humorous pop - please don't imagine that I urinate on the lowering coffins of plebs.

    1. Re:Hmm by nonsequitor · · Score: 1

      Its not the dead that deserve respect, but the people who cared about them who are currently dealing with their recent loss who do. Obviously many readers of this site cared about his works, but disrespecting his memory so soon after passing could cause those who cared about him undue emotional distress. Its called consideration for others, also known as tact, its a useful skill, you may want to learn it.

  131. A pox on your favorite camel by abb3w · · Score: 1

    The only thing that's sacred is nothing.

    Not if there's Wiccans around, for Mother Nature a'whores a vacuum.

    --
    //Information does not want to be free; it wants to breed.
    1. Re:A pox on your favorite camel by mrmeval · · Score: 1

      Actually the system currently in place likes vacuums a lot. So much so that it's set things up so that all the icky bits are crammed into little balls of goo.

      Then it sets them on fire. ;)

      --
      I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
  132. OK, I'll ask. by goldcd · · Score: 1

    Are the immediate family of Robert Jordan hanging about on slashdot, reading my posts and being offended.
    If they are - sorry, I didn't expect you to be about and I'll vanish off into the void.
    If in the case we like to call 'probable' there aren't, would you consider getting off your high f'in horse and quit the cries of "Will somebody think of the Jordans?".
    Either way, I think I shall leave this thread to whither, I'm way too old and supposedly mature to induldge myself in bickering.

  133. Didn't get through the first one by JimmytheGeek · · Score: 1

    s/Trollusks/orcs/g

    Now, I know you need baddies, but it just seemed derivative and stale. There are some problems with the Song of Ice and Fire, but it has texture, characters, fractal conflict. Jordan seemed to offer page count.

  134. The Wheel of Time by Stickerboy · · Score: 1

    The Wheel of Time is the World of Warcraft on paper. No, really. Everything good about WoW is pretty much true of tWoT. Conversely, anything frustrating or just plain bad about WoW is also true of tWoT.

    --
    Light a fire for a man and he'll be warm for a day. Light a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
  135. Re:Kevin J Anderson and Brian Herbert by fractoid · · Score: 1

    You're saying that he cracked a chubby about chubbies? Popped a pringle over plumpies? Had a hard-on for heavies?

    --
    Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
  136. Re:Kevin J Anderson and Brian Herbert by edward2020 · · Score: 1

    I'm not saying that I don't enjoy L.E. Modesitt, but you've got to admit that his books are rather formulaic. Do we really want the last WoT to end with some long essay about ethics?

    --
    Don't worry about the mule, just load the wagon.
  137. You people lasted 5 books? by Cryptimus · · Score: 1

    Crikey, I only lasted three. When the guy devotes pages and pages of dense text to the act of getting up, saddling the horses and buggering off, you know that the book has now turned into complete filler.

        Since then, I've held the view that Jordan fans are easily-pleased and lacking any kind of discrimination. Those books really are incredibly boring.

  138. Re:Kevin J Anderson and Brian Herbert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh come on. Everybody knows fat chicks are dirty sluts.

  139. Re:Kevin J Anderson and Brian Herbert by Julie+Bayley · · Score: 1

    You might want to visit http://www.lastingtribute.co.uk/ where there is a good tribute to Robert Jordan. People have already started leaving their own tributes to him as well on the site. Thanks

  140. Re:Kevin J Anderson and Brian Herbert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You people are stupid.

    I read the first book and figured out the author was taking waaaaay too long to say what he wanted to say. I have never read another in the series and my life is not measurably any worse.

  141. Re:Kevin J Anderson and Brian Herbert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So much for RAFO.

  142. Re:Kevin J Anderson and Brian Herbert by geekwithsoul · · Score: 1

    Perhaps not, but I would like the damn thing to end -- and what could be more formulaic than the Wheel of Time series? The repeating cycle of good and evil that was touched on in Tolkien, explanded on by Eddings and others including Modesitt, is a pretty standard fantasy formula. Jordan came up with some interesting twists, but the whole thing is just on long twelve volume morality play -- I still think Modesitt would be a good pick.

    Whomever gets the nod to complete it though -- I'm much more likely to read it than if Jordan had lived to complete it.

  143. Re:Kevin J Anderson and Brian Herbert by richardmguy · · Score: 1

    Hah! I stopped for very nearly the same reason. I made a deal with myself somewhere around book 6 that if he introduced another new female character in the next 100 pages and described her as having "rose petal lips" that I was done. So I was done...

  144. Re:Kevin J Anderson and Brian Herbert by William-Ely · · Score: 1

    I completely agree with you. It seemed like every even book after #2 was spent setting up a big event in the odd one to follow. I stopped in the middle of 10 because book 11 hadn't been released yet and I kind of lost momentum. All things considered, whether you like his books or hated them, he kept on writing until the end like he promised and that's something worthy of respect.

    --
    Mod me down with all of your hatred, and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
  145. Re:Kevin J Anderson and Brian Herbert by nahdude812 · · Score: 1

    If you got up to half way through book 10, I'd recommend you try book 11, even if you never finish book 10 (I think you'll be able to pick up fine). A lot of things start to come together in this book, it's definitely not one of the slower ones.

  146. Re:Kevin J Anderson and Brian Herbert by William-Ely · · Score: 1

    Oh I definitely intend to read book 11 and 12 if it gets released. In fact I've recently started reading the series from the beginning hoping that book 12 would be released by the time I was ready for it.

    --
    Mod me down with all of your hatred, and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
  147. In Remebrance of Robert Jordan by janna1288 · · Score: 1

    I am saddened by the news that Robert Jordan has passed away. I am a huge fan of The Wheel of Time Series. I would like to offer my fellow fans an opportunity to celebrate his memory, by giving to a great cause. I am running a marathon as a part of Team in Training, which is the largest fundraising organization for The Leukemia and Lymphoma Society. This society funds research and offers financial support to individual patients. The Society aims to eradicate blood cancers, and sufferers of myeloma often experience amyloidosis, which is what Robert Jordan ultimately died from.
            The donation process is incredibly simple. You can donate online. If you go to my Team in Training Website at: http://www.active.com/donate/tntma/tntmaJJobel you can donate with a credit card or debit card by clicking on the "Donate Now" button on the left of the page and then fill in your information when prompted. It's that simple. To learn more about the blood cancers or The Leukemia and Lymphoma Society you can go to http://www.leukemia-lymphoma.org/hm_lls If you would like to learn more about Team in training specifically, you can go to http://www.teamintraining.org/ If you have any questions or comments feel free to e-mail me at jml37@unh.edu