Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Battles Vista Perception With Prizes

LambAndMint writes "In what can only be described as an act of utter desperation to overcome Vista's mostly negative public perception issues, Microsoft has put together an online "Fact or Fiction" quiz about Windows Vista. Every person who submits themselves to Microsoft indoctrination gets a free shirt and the chance to win a $15,000 prize. Some of the supposed 'facts' will make you feel like you're reading a document from an alternate reality. Get ready to get a job as a computer salesman for a mass-market retailer as you go through the quiz."

342 comments

  1. All I read was... by csguy314 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Woohoo! Free shirt!

    --
    This is left as an exercise for the reader.
    1. Re:All I read was... by irby0 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Free shirt for OEM system builders.

    2. Re:All I read was... by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      what is this arachnology!?


      i want a free shirt, seriously i need some new clothes and free is better than paying.

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    3. Re:All I read was... by DMoylan · · Score: 1

      no, it looks like you have to install silver light shite. that's way too expensive for my tastes.

    4. Re:All I read was... by Brian+Gordon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I tried to play it because I'm certainly willing to have half an hour of laughs for a good shirt.. but the "australia" in the URL is scary since they're shipping things, and though I'd have been willing to install some activex control and take the quiz in IE, apparently the SilverLight installer is just some shady .exe.... so no way ~~~~

    5. Re:All I read was... by coolhaus · · Score: 5, Funny

      Woohoo! Free shirt!

      I dropped an "r" or two when I first read that. It made better sense at first, honestly.

    6. Re:All I read was... by edwardpickman · · Score: 4, Funny

      Great, a free t-shirt that...

      You have to type in Allow before you can put it on.

      Can only be washed in Microsoft approved detergent

      And isn't compatible with any other clothes I own.

      I'll stick with my plain white open source t-shirt

    7. Re:All I read was... by somersault · · Score: 4, Funny

      Meh.. I don't care if it's free - I'm not going to get one unless they provide access to the source pattern..

      --
      which is totally what she said
    8. Re:All I read was... by roc97007 · · Score: 2, Insightful


        --------- Woohoo! Free shirt!


      Yeah, you could always wear it inside-out.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    9. Re:All I read was... by xkhaozx · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I'm guessing then you don't have Java, Flash or even any other software because the install is just some shady .exe...

    10. Re:All I read was... by harry666t · · Score: 5, Funny

      Would you like to see the questions?

      The first was: you're trying to get a free t-shirt. Cancel or Allow?

    11. Re:All I read was... by ozbird · · Score: 2, Funny

      You forgot one:

      Is far too big to fit on you.

    12. Re:All I read was... by durnurd · · Score: 4, Funny

      And you have to get a new torso before you can put it on, otherwise you can only walk really slowly... right? And when you do get your new torso, all of your clothes will become slightly transparent.

      --
      --Edward Dassmesser
    13. Re:All I read was... by plover · · Score: 2, Funny

      Woohoo! Free shirt!

      I dropped an "r" or two when I first read that. It made better sense at first, honestly.

      Fee shirt? I don't think that makes much sense, either.

      --
      John
    14. Re:All I read was... by totally+bogus+dude · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well they did say they were okay with ActiveX, and the Flash plugin for IE is an ActiveX control, so it's possible they at least have that installed. The real WTF though is considering ActiveX controls to be somehow different from "some shady .exe".

    15. Re:All I read was... by calebt3 · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's not free. You are selling your soul.

    16. Re:All I read was... by HartDev · · Score: 1

      Wanna bet I can find myself a free Linux shirt somewhere...?

      --
      To see a few of my Android apps goto: www.hartwired.com
    17. Re:All I read was... by neonsignal · · Score: 3, Funny

      Opened up the quiz page, but all I saw was a black screen (with some funny logo up in the top left corner). Darn, must be that content safety filter...

    18. Re:All I read was... by calebt3 · · Score: 1

      Let's turn the n00b's "logic" back on them: It's free so it must suck.

    19. Re:All I read was... by calebt3 · · Score: 1

      Darn, must be that content safety filter...
      It's NoScript and a lack of Silverlight.

    20. Re:All I read was... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Woohoo! Free shirt!

      I dropped an "r" or two when I first read that. It made better sense at first, honestly.

      Fee shirt? I don't think that makes much sense, either.

      Fee shit.
    21. Re:All I read was... by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Seriously, bought good fit and good looking clothes are much better than free ugly ones. Do yourself a favor and get rid of all crap clothes and buy new good ones ;D

      If it hangs lose, got ugly advertisement or prints, got broken or bad elastics, are worn out (socks) just throw it away ;D

      Seriously, you must be way better of without a Microsoft shirt. It always hurt in my stomach when I see people wearing anything which says Microsoft or MCSE ;D

    22. Re:All I read was... by Mahjub+Sa'aden · · Score: 4, Funny

      And you have to get a new torso before you can put it on, otherwise you can only walk really slowly... right? And when you do get your new torso, all of your clothes will become slightly transparent. This being the internet, I'm going to go ahead and tell you that slightly transparent clothes really flatter me. Women have commented, or should I say drooled, when I wear something sheer. And I own the Golden Gate Bridge. True story.
      --
      What is is all that is. Isn't that obvious?
    23. Re:All I read was... by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Not to mention that by default it will make everyone else stop talking to you or share free stuff.

    24. Re:All I read was... by srmalloy · · Score: 4, Informative

      Going to the URL with both IE and Firefox showed nothing but a black browser window and a button to download and install Microsoft Silverlight. "We're going to give you the opportunity to win something, but you have to let us install our latest proprietary extension." No, thanks.

    25. Re:All I read was... by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      trust me on this, you take life too seriously. but just to make you feel better, in RL i usually wear unbranded polos and khakis. yea i'm just as boring in RL as i am online. but i don't get a rocket launcher in RL

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    26. Re:All I read was... by timpaton · · Score: 2, Funny

      The free shirt identifies you as a "Windows Vista Advisor".

      If the label fits... I often advise people to avoid Vista.

    27. Re:All I read was... by HartDev · · Score: 0, Troll

      Haha right, I got a friend who would rather spend all day hacking Mac OS X then just running Ubuntu, when I tell that Mac Os sucked until they took BSD code he just says he wants to run OS X.....I gotta admit I really want a dock myself!

      --
      To see a few of my Android apps goto: www.hartwired.com
    28. Re:All I read was... by calebt3 · · Score: 1

      Try AWN.
      https://launchpad.net/awn

    29. Re:All I read was... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But what does your boyfriend think about it?

    30. Re:All I read was... by udippel · · Score: 1

      Seriously, bought good fit and good looking clothes are much better than free ugly ones. Do yourself a favor and get rid of all crap clothes and buy new good ones

      I for one got a nice black, free, one. People say it suits me great. OpenSolaris World Tour. No, no online photos available. It doesn't hang lose, not slacking, funny prints, like http://logo.cafepress.com/7/4829055.2658817.jpg.

    31. Re:All I read was... by wouter · · Score: 1

      Don't head over to Adobe, then! You might need to install their proprietary extension!

    32. Re:All I read was... by tsa · · Score: 1

      Yeah now I understand why the link to ninemsn was in the blurb. Nobody will be able to actually play the game and win a t-shirt because of this silverlight thing.

      --

      -- Cheers!

    33. Re:All I read was... by ozmanjusri · · Score: 1

      No, you can browse their site without it.

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    34. Re:All I read was... by ozmanjusri · · Score: 4, Funny
      Wanna bet I can find myself a free Linux shirt somewhere

      I've open-sourced my Linux shirts.

      Just copy the text below into a word-processor, scale it up to your shirt size, and print it onto the shirt.

      LINUX

      You can thank me later.

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    35. Re:All I read was... by iamacat · · Score: 1

      I think I will just wait for my vendor to evaluate security of Silverlight and bundle it with an OS update. I have been enjoying the lack of spyware on my platform and I am not looking forward to making my browser be more like Internet Explorer. While the flash plugin is already bundled, I am avoiding Acrobat Reader because it's far slower and visually bulkier than the built in PDF viewer and hijacks the browser and file extensions.

      Maybe Silverlight is the greatest thing on Earth, but I just have lost the trust in the vendor. I mean, would you really download any software from companies that made Gator, Comet cursor or New.net. Microsoft better ponder what happened to Real and come up with a strategy to regain the confidence that people had in their products in the days of early MS-DOS.

    36. Re:All I read was... by MORB · · Score: 1

      All I read was "GET SILVERLIGHT NOWZ!!1!"

      Why would I want to install their shit for the dubious privilege of being fed marketing bullshit in an interactive way?

      *facepalm*

    37. Re:All I read was... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      >but the "australia" in the URL is scary since they're shipping things
      Yeah, ya gotta watch out for those Australians shipping things. Why, they might try to slip a kangaroo into the package or something.

      >apparently the SilverLight installer is just some shady .exe.
      As opposed to the rest of the software on your computer that just magically appeared and runs in some otherworldly fashion, I suppose.

      But, my goodness, you're quite the Slashbot - I especially admire the fact that you got modded up for bashing Microsoft when you use Windows on your computer. The hypocrisy here knows no bounds, apparently.

      I know, I know: "You must be new here".

    38. Re:All I read was... by eulernet · · Score: 1

      It may be free, but you'll be too ashamed to ever put it on !

    39. Re:All I read was... by psychicsword · · Score: 1

      And College Students who say they are an OEM system builder

    40. Re:All I read was... by BadOPCode · · Score: 1

      No its worst than that. You have to be a OEM builder in Australia to even qualify to win. It said which AUSTRALIA territories are valid. I'm pretty certain that disqualifies people in the US. I didn't see California in the list of Australian states qualified to win. Silverlight is a MS replacement for Flash. So now our choices for this kind of HTTP applets is Java, Flash, and Silverlight. Two on this list is owned by the spawns of Satan. Can't OOS community put together something better?

    41. Re:All I read was... by Brian+Gordon · · Score: 1

      ActiveX controls are supposed to run in a sandboxed environment.. easily broken I know but Microsoft isn't going to break their own security, so I can be reasonably sure an activex silverlight will only touch IE, which I don't care about.

    42. Re:All I read was... by JohnFluxx · · Score: 1

      >apparently the SilverLight installer is just some shady .exe.
      As opposed to the rest of the software on your computer that just magically appeared and runs in some otherworldly fashion, I suppose.

      In linux, when you install a package, it is digitally signed so that you know that it comes from who it says it does. I think Windows has some sort of digital signing of executables, but I don't know the details.

    43. Re:All I read was... by totally+bogus+dude · · Score: 2, Interesting

      ActiveX controls are supposed to run in a sandboxed environment

      Do you have a reference for this? I did a quick Google for activex sandbox without much luck.

      The top hit is this rather dated page which says:

      ActiveX security relies entirely on human judgement. ActiveX programs come with digital signatures from the author of the program and anybody else who chooses to endorse the program.

      You have two choices: either accept the program and let it do whatever it wants on your machine, or reject it completely.

      That was written in 1997 and maybe (most likely) they've changed things since then, but it definitely wasn't written with a sandbox in mind. Actually, most or all of the links in that search date from the late nineties.

      Changing the search to "activex security" and we get a nice page on MSDN that says:

      An ActiveX control can be an extremely insecure way to provide a feature. Because it is a Component Object Model (COM) object, it can do anything the user can do from that computer. It can read from and write to the registry, and it has access to the local file system. From the moment a user downloads an ActiveX control, the control may be vulnerable to attack because any Web application on the Internet can repurpose it, that is, use the control for its own ends whether sincere or malicious. But, you can take precautions when you write a control to help avert an attack.

      No idea when that was written or if it still applies. So, do you have any references on this subject?

      Time for some anecdotal "evidence". A week or so ago I was asked to upload a large (2+ gig) debug trace file to Microsoft's tech support site, and doing that made use of an ActiveX control (I tried using Firefox with the "simple upload" option but I just got a generic and uninformative server error). Given the way in which it sat there saying "Connecting..." 99% of the time with the occasional momentary change to say it was transferring data, I'm sure this wasn't using a plain HTTP POST file upload. Which means this control was able to read the zip file on my desktop and upload it to the site.

      Even more disturbing was the effect it had on my RDP session. I used 7-Zip to zip it with maximum compression and since that was gonna take a while I went home, and connected to my desktop later that night to do the upload. Set it going and started doing some other stuff and noticed my keyboard was being weird: almost every keystroke was being duplicated. I've got a Microsoft wireless keyboard and sometimes it does odd things like repeat a keystroke a bunch of times, but this was just twice and for everything. So I closed the IE window and disconnected the RDP session and re-connected -- back to normal.

      Started the upload up again and sure enough, same problem. Disconnected the RDP session thinking maybe it was just a bit confused by the crappy uploader ActiveX page and logging in again would reset it. Went to reconnect, and found the keystrokes were being duplicated even on the login dialog! At that point I gave up and just left it for the weekend.

      If an ActiveX control can somehow screw up key processing for the RDP login dialog, then I have a tough time believing it's actually sandboxed in any meaningful way. If you have references to the contrary, I'd love to see them.

    44. Re:All I read was... by fropenn · · Score: 1

      You have to live in Australia to participate...doesn't living in Australia already come with enough benefits? And now, the chance to win a Vista T-shirt!?! I'm packing my bags.
      http://www.microsoft.com/australia/vistafacts/terms.aspx

    45. Re:All I read was... by Experiment+626 · · Score: 1

      That's cool and all, but how about a version of your post that includes an ASCII-art Tux

    46. Re:All I read was... by HartDev · · Score: 1

      Thank you kind sir, I also think a black marker that says Linux would work, you think?

      --
      To see a few of my Android apps goto: www.hartwired.com
    47. Re:All I read was... by HartDev · · Score: 1

      I was having all these problems, I tried a few different docks and one worked but looked all crappy. I even tried to install kubuntu cause I thought that KDE would install a dock better. I tried writing about it on my site linuxplease.com/blog or just linuxplease.com and get some help, but thanks anyhow guys, maybe I will have to have a fresh install of Gnome ubuntu.

      --
      To see a few of my Android apps goto: www.hartwired.com
    48. Re:All I read was... by cjsm · · Score: 1

      I wonder what would happen to someone who worked at Microsoft and wore that shirt. Get fired, probably. At least that's how companies react to such things in my experience.

      --
      This ad space for rent.
    49. Re:All I read was... by iron+Dan · · Score: 1

      When you are an Australian OEM system builder and actually get one of these shirts, I bet it will arrive in shrink-wrap with a big EULA sticker on it that reads something like:

      When accepting this EULA you agree to proudly wear this shirt to your work, to wash it daily using Microsoft(r) certified color washing powder (order no. X87-00640KB), agree not to remove or add any letters, numbers or graphics to change the text and/or graphics on this shirt and agree not to install Windows XP(tm) onto any OEM system again.

    50. Re:All I read was... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's probably why they chose to give out polo shirts.

    51. Re:All I read was... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haha right, I got a friend who would rather spend all day hacking Mac OS X then just running Ubuntu, when I tell that Mac Os sucked until they took BSD code he just says he wants to run OS X.....I gotta admit I really want a cock myself!

      All fixed. (you forgot to run spell-check)
    52. Re:All I read was... by AdamThor · · Score: 1

      Who are they trying to convince? If you have silverlight then you've clearly already drank the kool-aid. Maybe it requires WGA as well?

      --
      -- "Oh. This guy again."
    53. Re:All I read was... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Put it on? I was going to use it to wash the car!

  2. Propaganda by milsoRgen · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Microsoft has put together an online "Fact or Fiction" quiz about Windows Vista. What's with the all the online based propacation Microsoft is using these days?
    --
    I'm sick of following my dreams. I'm just going to ask where they're goin' and hook up with 'em later.
    1. Re:Propaganda by CSMatt · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm assuming that question was rhetorical.

    2. Re:Propaganda by milsoRgen · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And the actual meat and potatoes of all this would be here, Silverlight required of course!

      --
      I'm sick of following my dreams. I'm just going to ask where they're goin' and hook up with 'em later.
    3. Re:Propaganda by Ynot_82 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why?

      if you're trying to win people over,
      why restrict the "facts" site to people you've already got (requiring silverlight....)

    4. Re:Propaganda by Divebus · · Score: 5, Funny

      Oh. It's just a way to seed Silverlight. Nevermind.

      --

      Most of the stuff on /. won't survive first contact with facts.
    5. Re:Propaganda by matazar · · Score: 2

      Only for australians?!
      I want a free shirt :(.
      Canadas never get anything.

      Also, vista isn't so bad.
      Don't like it, then don't use it.
      Bitching about it isn't going to make it go away.

    6. Re:Propaganda by milsoRgen · · Score: 1

      Bitching about it isn't going to make it go away. I dunno, when I'm ranting and bitching to myself while doing my daily web crawl, it sure seems to make my old lady go away pretty quick.
      --
      I'm sick of following my dreams. I'm just going to ask where they're goin' and hook up with 'em later.
    7. Re:Propaganda by YaroMan86 · · Score: 1

      Fortunately, I see no FUD here, especially after reading the "correct" answers Microsoft provides for it, and the highly restrictive rules. Have to be in Australia, have to be an MS ass-kissing OEM, and basically the best way to get a good score is to flatter MS. FUD? Plus you have to use Silverlight to play it. I don't think installing Silverlight is worth a T-Shirt that probably advertises being an MS shill anyway. Anyone have a good link to buy some good Linux-themed T-shirts?

    8. Re:Propaganda by the_Bionic_lemming · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Bingo. that's absolutely correct. It's maddening when I have to hit their site (for work) and I have to click to remove that stupid silverlight full page cover.

      I don't want it, I don't need it, and please, for the love of god, stop mooning me with it.

      --
      _ _ _ Go for the eyes Boo! GO FOR THE EYES!
    9. Re:Propaganda by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 2, Funny
      hippocracy apparently knows no bounds...

      If we were discussing anything other than Vista, I'd correct your spelling.

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    10. Re:Propaganda by milsoRgen · · Score: 1

      a T-Shirt that probably advertises being an MS shill anyway. I dunno that'd be a pretty awesome shirt, from a comedic stand point. Maybe a big grinning face, with two thumbs up, saying, "Microsoft! We're A-okay". I'd wear it till the sleeves fell off.
      --
      I'm sick of following my dreams. I'm just going to ask where they're goin' and hook up with 'em later.
    11. Re:Propaganda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sleeves?! :-)

      That's the Business Edition T-shirt.

      You get the cheap freebie Home Edition T-Shirt without sleeves.

      Or you can upgrade to sleeves for $50.00

      Some sleeves are incompatible with people, pants, colours, fashion styles, etc. Contact the manufacturer for upgrading drivers...err, I mean sleeves.

      Some sleeves are prone to disintegration due to airborne viruses, unknown laundry detergent agents, etc.
      Please use approved anti-virus bleach, etc. (Cost $100 for a one year subscription).

      Copying other sleeves and/or adding/modifying sleeves is against the t-shirt EULA and copyright law.
      Downloading sleeve patterns, instructions, source code for making sleeves, etc. will land you in jail and/or fines.

      Have a nice day!
      Sincerely,
      Microsoft - "Where shall we take you today?"

    12. Re:Propaganda by porl · · Score: 1

      yeah, it must be good when microsoft's new tactic appears to be 'use it. please!! we'll give you free stuff!!' :)

    13. Re:Propaganda by empaler · · Score: 1

      TFS isn't good to point out that it's intended for OEMs and other sales channels - this campaign isn't targeted at end-users. One would expect that people making money off of the MS waves of... brown would have SilverLight installed. Personally, I wouldn't expect even MS' own employees to have it.

    14. Re:Propaganda by Hucko · · Score: 1

      Isn't Suse normally green?

      --
      Semi-automatic amateur armchair Australian philosopher; conjecture ready at any moment...
    15. Re:Propaganda by MadnessASAP · · Score: 1

      At the end you can change the shipping address to any country so get on it man. The quiz in reality takes about 7 minutes to complete given that all the questions are pretty fucking brainless and then it's on to the partially broken shipping info form.

      --
      I may agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to face the consequences of saying it.
    16. Re:Propaganda by hullabalucination · · Score: 2, Funny

      Canadas never get anything.

      What are you complaining about? You Canadians have lots of stuff that Australians don't have, like maple syrup and Dave Foley.

      Say, while you're here, I've got a proposition. We'll trade you North Dakota and Michigan's Upper Peninsula for British Columbia. What do you say? OK, we'll throw in this set of steak knives, too.

      * * * * *

      Canadians are just Americans with better haircuts.

    17. Re:Propaganda by udippel · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Oh. It's just a way to seed Silverlight. Nevermind.

      And a bad one.
      Here:
      Black screen. Only. Okay, NoScript pops up. I *allow* Microsoft.com (pun)
      Now the black screen is still black, with a tiny icon on top: Get Silverlight. I *click*.
      A full screen pops up inviting me to download. "Install Microsoft Silverlight now for a
      better Web experience". I click. "Download Silverlight.exe" 'OK'. ... and I'm still waiting ...

      Yes, that's only bad. My browser identifies as "Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; SunOS i86pc; en-US; rv:1.8.1.10) Gecko/20071230 Firefox/2.0.0.10". Any well-done site would inform me that I am not yet a convert, and point me to http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/Search.aspx?displaylang=en for reference.

    18. Re:Propaganda by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      Also, vista isn't so bad.
      Don't like it, then don't use it.
      Bitching about it isn't going to make it go away. I have to admit I don't really get all the Vista hysteria either. From what I recall, the general sentiment was pretty much the same when XP was released (most home users never saw 2k) : "whine, whine, bloat, useless eye candy".

      Granted I only used Vista for all of 10 minutes when trying to recover an SD card that seemed to be dead according to my camera and to Linux on my recently bought laptop (came with Vista, runs KUbuntu). Vista said something along the lines of "aha, you are not allowed to write to that peripheral, you lowlife, this is *my* computer now". I poked a bit at permissions and in the end just shrugged and killed its partition to add it to my photo storage space.

      On the other hand I see a few people using it with little issues. The main problem I consistently see is novice users that get confused with the 12 shutdown options (shutdown, sleep, slumber, snore, turn off, snooze, doze off, etc.). Apart from that it mostly works as expected (I've only seen it on laptops though since it's nearly impossible to get one without the thing lately). Nobody seems to mind the occasional confirmation prompt (there's only one in a while and from what I've seen they're reasonably insightful, at least if you read the text, which most users probably won't do though), and the heavy DRM should only be a problem in specific cases that don't apply to any of the users I know (though I do agree it shouldn't even be there in the first place).

      I have yet to see it in a business setting though.

      As for me I've run Linux or BSD for more than 10 years as my main platform so I'm not very up to date with the whole Microsoft thing. Just reporting what I see around me.
      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    19. Re:Propaganda by saintlupus · · Score: 1

      As a Buffalo resident, I'd like to ask that we get traded to Ontario in this deal. I'm sick of crossing the Peace Bridge every time I want to go to a decent strip joint.

      Oh, and North Dakota is more properly known as "Southskatchewan". Doesn't that sound more tropical?

      --saint

    20. Re:Propaganda by dna_(c)(tm)(r) · · Score: 1

      Canadas never get anything.
      What are you complaining about? You Canadians have lots of stuff that Australians don't have, like maple syrup and Dave Foley. Say, while you're here, I've got a proposition. We'll trade you North Dakota and Michigan's Upper Peninsula for British Columbia. What do you say? OK, we'll throw in this set of steak knives, too.

      ...throw in a chair and a free T-shirt and you got yourself a deal.

    21. Re:Propaganda by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > From what I recall, the general sentiment was pretty much the same when XP was released

      Yeah, it was.

      You want to remember why? Get yourself an early copy of XP (before they started including the service packs on the CD), install it, and then try to use the computer like that, without any of the updates. Go ahead, try it. You'll be amazed at what you've forgotten about how bad XP was when it was new. Oh, yeah, don't forget to try to install some contemporary third-party software that was clearly designed for Windows 98 and rush-certified as theoretically able to be run under XP. Also don't forget to try to set up the peer-to-peer networking to share printers with a Windows 98 system. Haha.

      Here's the thing: you can beta test up to a point, but there are whole categories of bugs you never find until you turn the real users loose on it. It takes a while to get those pinned down.

      Windows 95 was pretty bad until OSR2 came out, and even then its compatibility with DOS-based software left a lot to be desired, so it wasn't until pretty much all third-party software had been updated for Windows 95 that it really came into its own. Windows XP, initially, was a real pain, but by the time you get all the updates installed now, you've actually got something more-or-less usable. It's not what _I_ want to use... but then neither was any other version of Windows. If you compare an XP install that's current with all its updates up against other Windows versions, then XP doesn't look so bad.

      Same with Vista. It's a new product. Therefore, it's not a mature product. Duh. Give it time.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
  3. Sheesh. by Divebus · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm glad they're not running an airline. They'd be in the side of a mountain by now.

    --

    Most of the stuff on /. won't survive first contact with facts.
    1. Re:Sheesh. by csguy314 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Sure, you make that sound like a bad thing. But for all the people that *live* on the side of the mountain it'd be pretty darn convenient. ...
      Uhh... Don't mind the burning fuselage, it's a feature!

      --
      This is left as an exercise for the reader.
    2. Re:Sheesh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      I'm glad Slashdot isn't pimping a competing airline or I'd be sitting in the airport reading "In a pathetic attempt to get people to fly their sucky airline, Delta is having a terrible contest to pretend that their stupid airline isn't for losers."

      Microsoft must be having a pretty good day if this is the worst thing the Lunix mob can slime them with. Wasn't there a new vulnerability found in IE or something?

    3. Re:Sheesh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would be convenient if I wanted a burning fuselage near my house, but come on, it's totally ruining my otherwise gorgeous vista.

    4. Re:Sheesh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes.

    5. Re:Sheesh. by Stormwatch · · Score: 5, Funny

      1990s called, they want their joke back...

      ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

      What if Operating Systems Were Airlines?

      DOS Airlines
      Everybody pushes the airplane until it glides, then they jump on and let the plane coast until it hits the ground again, then they push again jump on again, and so on.

      Windows Air
      The terminal is pretty and colorful, with friendly stewards, easy baggage check and boarding, and a smooth take-off. After about 10 minutes in the air, the plane explodes with no warning whatsoever.

      Windows NT Air
      Just like Windows Air, but costs more, uses much bigger planes, and takes out all the other aircraft within a 40-mile radius when it explodes.

      Mac Airlines
      All the stewards, stewardesses, captains, baggage handlers, and ticket agents look the same, act the same, and talk the same. Every time you ask questions about details, you are told you don't need to know, don't want to know, and would you please return to your seat and watch the movie.

      Unix Airlines
      Each passenger brings a piece of the airplane and a box of tools to the airport. They gather on the tarmac, arguing constantly about what kind of plane they want to build and how to put it together. Eventually, they build several different aircraft, but give them all the same name. Some passengers actually reach their destinations. All passengers believe they got there.

      OS/2 Airlines
      The terminal is almost empty, with only a few prospective passengers milling about. The announcer says that their flight has just departed, wishes them a good flight, though there are no planes on the runway. Airline personnel walk around, apologising profusely to customers in hushed voices, pointing from time to time to the sleek, powerful jets outside the terminal on the field. They tell each passenger how good the real flight will be on these new jets and how much safer it will be than Windows Airlines, but that they will have to wait a little longer for the technicians to finish the flight systems. Once they finally finished you're offered a flight at reduced cost. To board the plane, you have your ticket stamped ten different times by standing in ten different lines. Then you fill our a form showing where you want to sit and whether the plane should look and feel like an ocean liner, a passenger train or a bus. If you succeed in getting on the plane and the plane succeeds in taking off the ground, you have a wonderful trip...except for the time when the rudder and flaps get frozen in position, in which case you will just have time to say your prayers and get in crash position.

      Wings of OS/400
      The airline has bought ancient DC-3s, arguably the best and safest planes that ever flew, and painted "747" on their tails to make them look as if they are fast. The flight attendants, of course, attend to your every need, though the drinks cost $15 a pop. Stupid questions cost $230 per hour, unless you have SupportLine, which requires a first class ticket and membership in the frequent flyer club. Then they cost $500, but your accounting department can call it overhead.

      Mach Airlines
      There is no airplane. The passengers gather and shout for an airplane, then wait and wait and wait and wait. A bunch of people come, each carrying one piece of the plane with them. These people all go out on the runway and put the plane together piece by piece, arguing constantly about what kind of plane they're building. The plane finally takes off, leaving the passengers on the ground waiting and waiting and waiting and waiting. After the plane lands, the pilot telephones the passengers at the departing airport to inform them that they have arrived.

      Newton Airlines
      After buying your ticket 18 months in advance, you finally get to board the plane. Upon boarding the plane you are asked your name. After 6 times, the crew member recognizes your name and then you are allowed to take your seat. As you are getting ready to take your seat, th

    6. Re:Sheesh. by Sta7ic · · Score: 1

      It's definitely a feature. Get out of the way, you're hogging all the heat!

    7. Re:Sheesh. by Foofoobar · · Score: 1

      Sure, you make that sound like a bad thing. But for all the people that *live* on the side of the mountain it'd be pretty darn convenient. ...
      Yeah but how many of those people living on the side of the mountain got 'relocated' due to a crashed 747 run by Microsoft?
      --
      This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is mine.
    8. Re:Sheesh. by spir0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      hey don't laugh. while _they_ may not be running an airline, their software most certainly is. And in time, if M$ get their way, all the _planes_ too.

      then woe betide anyone living on the sides of mountains. the gates foundation will be relocating thousands of tibetan monks.

      --
      The reason girls and Windows users don't understand UNIX is because all the documentation is in Man files.
    9. Re:Sheesh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i'm an old *nix head. in the dark midst of time we used to joke about ms windows fitting the bill for a virus definition. obviously bill & steve like the rbn's business model better than their own "rush" tactics.

      btw, no doubt ms have a whole dungeon full of monkeys working on vista-based avionics systems.
      the airliner/mountain gestalt isn't too far away to be sure.

      have a nice day. :)

    10. Re:Sheesh. by T-Bucket · · Score: 1

      Clearly you've never dealt with people who are ACTUALLY running an airline. Hell, the scheduling department at the airline I work for makes MS look not only competent, but downright benevolent.

    11. Re:Sheesh. by QuasiEvil · · Score: 2, Funny

      Have you priced natural gas during the winter? A burning fuselage close enough to provide radiant heat is definitely a selling point.

    12. Re:Sheesh. by The_reformant · · Score: 1

      Surely in linux airlines you are fired through a series of pipes

      --
      I have discovered a truly remarkable sig which this post is too small to contain.
    13. Re:Sheesh. by asylumx · · Score: 1

      It seems we've clipped a mountain. My fault, my fault. Free drinks for everyone -- hurry! For those of you on the right side of the plane who have been shafted the whole flight, you can now see the right wing out the left side of the plane. We know you have a choice when travelling, and, well, you picked wrong. (Bob & Tom bit, for those who are in the dark. I forget the name of the comedian.)

  4. And the grand prize...... by edwardpickman · · Score: 4, Funny

    is a free upgrade to XP Pro!

    1. Re:And the grand prize...... by jack455 · · Score: 1

      I think we're calling it a side-grade these days

  5. I went to Camp Microsoft... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...and all I got was this lousy operating system.

    (But the T-Shirt wasn't half bad)

    1. Re:I went to Camp Microsoft... by eclectro · · Score: 1

      The question I have, can I enter for the prizes without purchasing Vista??

      Otherwise, it's just too much of a gamble...

      --
      Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
  6. here we go again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    first post

  7. Prizes by buyvalve · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The grand prize includes a multitude of Sony products. *sniff* I can smell the conspiracy theorists from here!

    1. Re:Prizes by Penguinisto · · Score: 1

      The grand prize includes a multitude of Sony products.

      ...because even Microsoft knows that folks want Blu-Ray and not HD-DVD?

      (/me ducks and runzlakhell...)

      /P

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
  8. What site? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    All I can see in Firefox is a notice that says "Get Microsoft Silverlight". I thought it was an ad for Vista... *confused*

    1. Re:What site? by lexarius · · Score: 1

      Silverlight = Microsoft Flash. Need to have the player installed to play the game.

    2. Re:What site? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Requiring an add-on to do what could be easily with an html form. Now, again, why should I trust them to control the development of the OS I run?

  9. Incentive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They should have offered punch and pie!!!

    1. Re:Incentive by CSMatt · · Score: 1

      Or a free hat.

  10. dont feed the troll by RiotingPacifist · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    stop feeding microsoft, just ignore them they'll go away and make a good product if they want some attention.

    --
    IranAir Flight 655 never forget!
    1. Re:dont feed the troll by Fx.Dr · · Score: 1

      they'll go away and make a good product if they want some attention.

      Or attempt a Yahoo buy-out.

    2. Re:dont feed the troll by Bender+Unit+22 · · Score: 0, Redundant

      That has not worked for the last 20 years.

    3. Re:dont feed the troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But if we stop feeding the trolls, ihatevista.org won't have any posters anymore.

    4. Re:dont feed the troll by Hucko · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      What games to you play with OO?

      --
      Semi-automatic amateur armchair Australian philosopher; conjecture ready at any moment...
  11. Why do they care about perception? by Cajun+Hell · · Score: 1, Redundant

    It'll still come preloaded on almost all non-Apple x86 boxes. Like it or hate it, Microsoft still gets the money and the marketshare statistics.

    --
    "Believe me!" -- Donald Trump
    1. Re:Why do they care about perception? by QuantumRiff · · Score: 4, Informative

      Because the preloading on non-apple x86 customers is only a small piece of the pie. What they really want is large corporations to start rolling it out by the truckload. Major companies don't want to do that, largely because of the perception (whether true or not) that it is a crappy product. Many large companies are flat out telling Dell and HP and their ilk that they will not mass order machines without XP on them, or that they better ensure that they can revert to XP, and still have working drivers and support. Then Dell, HP, and their ilk get mad, because they have to train employees how to troubleshoot problems on model X in two os's, driving their costs up.

      --

      What are we going to do tonight Brain?
    2. Re:Why do they care about perception? by QuantumRiff · · Score: 4, Informative
      Sorry to reply to my own post, forgot the second point....


      By not having large corporations move to vista, one of the major incentives for moving to Windows server 2008 is evaporated, meaning a huge financial hit for MS. One of the biggest selling features of 2008, is how well all the new features are supposed to work with vista. Yes, that and server core, and Hyper V.

      --

      What are we going to do tonight Brain?
    3. Re:Why do they care about perception? by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

      Because the marketing department's bonus depends upon the perception. They need proof that their huge budget accomplishes something.

      --
      Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
    4. Re:Why do they care about perception? by JebusIsLord · · Score: 1

      As one of those decision makers, we just now are rolling out XP here. Vista, from an imaging and deployment perspective, would have been lovely. When you take into account the number of legacy applications and the current hardware situation though, it becomes completely unfeasible. I don't think it was seriously considered for more than a day or two.

      --
      Jeremy
    5. Re:Why do they care about perception? by Farakin · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Absolutely the case. I work for CDW selling to large customers (500 emp +) NO ONE will order a machine with vista, we had to make Lenovo, Acer, HP offer downgrade disks available. The only way MS will pull a huge rollout is if they require those with EA's to upgrade on their next true up.

    6. Re:Why do they care about perception? by Threni · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm waiting for the next one:

      http://www.vistaforums.com/Forum/Topic13358-8-1.aspx

      Vienna - coming out next year. I think Vista will be swept under the carpet as soon as Vienna is out. In the meantime, SP3 for XP will be out soon, which apparently will make XP even faster than Vista on the same hardware. I still can't get over how slow Vista is at copying files off of USB drives, DVDs and networks.

    7. Re:Why do they care about perception? by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      As someone who has been running SP3 for awhile now,I can say that it boosted my machine by about 15%.I don't know whether it is the DRM,the file management,or what,but on my 3.06Ghz with 2Gb of RAM and a 6200 graphics card Vista ran like a slug.Maybe if you bought a brand new Dell specifically built for Vista it might be okay.But I build my own and I'm not about to throw out a pc that is barely 3 years old for Vista.especially when SP3 gives it such a boost.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    8. Re:Why do they care about perception? by RocketRabbit · · Score: 1

      Correct. Microsoft doesn't merely want you to have something of theirs, they want you to NEED it.

    9. Re:Why do they care about perception? by totally+bogus+dude · · Score: 3, Funny

      Huh? Didn't you read Microsoft's answers to the Microsoft Vista quiz??!

      Windows Vista faces significant Compatibility issues with hardware devices. Fiction! It's just not true!
      Windows Vista faces significant issues in terms of integrating with other software applications. Also fiction!!!

      I think whoever did your planning needs to re-take the quiz so they can learn the real truth. Microsoft's own quiz proves you wrong. Smackdown!

    10. Re:Why do they care about perception? by davidsyes · · Score: 1

      It's just too bad that Linux is not intensely capitalizing on this... Could managed Linux boxes running VirtualBox hosting XP be a great way to (after initial spike/bump) lower corporate costs?

      --
      Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
    11. Re:Why do they care about perception? by BootNinja · · Score: 1

      You mean they didn't want to pay someone to write two sets of troubleshooting scripts.

  12. No Thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A free tee-shirt isn't worth installing silverlight on my computer.

  13. Little slanted by Protonk · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is slashdot, but I find myself a little surprised to see this as a headline. Sure, microsoft is giving crap away in order to boost sales of their new lackluster OS. Same story happens in every business. Marketing gets told to go make some sales happen and they often ocme up with things like this. It's not propaganda anymore than any advertising is propaganda. How about we stick to decrying the main and major faults in the OS, rather than poking fun at a common business tactic. It's not like we are short on low hanging fruit.

    1. Re:Little slanted by Idiot+with+a+gun · · Score: 1

      True, but this low hanging fruit is particularly begging to get squished.

      Jokes aside, there is a reason we're taking a shot at this. Marketing and Advertising are nothing new, neither are these quizzes/sites. There are literally thousands of these things floating around on the internet, abandoned by the marketing departments that spawned them. But what makes this one unique is how the majority of the answers are either blatant lies, or ... well they're all lies to be honest.

      Besides, we've only had serious articles recently, who doesn't mind some humor? And Slashdot never misses a chance to MS-Bash as it turns out.

    2. Re:Little slanted by Protonk · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I mean I'm not foaming at the mouth because this is on here. It's funny, but it's kind of like "Large, ponderous company offers participants in hapless survey free stuff if they lie about how cool the company product is."

      IMO, more laptop battery explosion videos need to be on here.

    3. Re:Little slanted by Shajenko42 · · Score: 1

      It's not propaganda anymore than any advertising is propaganda.
      Think about that for just a second.
    4. Re:Little slanted by Protonk · · Score: 1

      I have. What's your point?

    5. Re:Little slanted by pembo13 · · Score: 1

      You sir, have a very generous definition of 'propaganda'. Bless you.

      --
      "Thanks for all the money you paid to us. We've used it to buy off ISO among other things" -Microsoft
    6. Re:Little slanted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Couldn't agree with you more, and I don't think Microsoft deserves any more or less respect than any other producer of goods.

      The reality of the situation is that this is so blatant, it's obviously a ploy designed to attract front page coverage on slashdot, hence getting silverlight installed on tens of thousands of machines of people who would never otherwise consider installing it ... and for the mere cost of $15,000 and a bunch of t-shirts they couldn't (previously) give away.

      What is silverlight anyway? Actually forget it, I really don't care.

    7. Re:Little slanted by 10101001+10101001 · · Score: 1

      Well, let's see. On the one hand, Microsoft is reporting recording earnings (IIRC) due in large part to Vista sales. On the other hand, they're trying to boost sales with a gimmicky prize/quiz thing. Sure, it's something that "happens in every business". But, not every business is a convincted monopolist with a basically guaranteed lock on the sale of their product (at some point, they can just raise the price of XP to push OEMs to go with Vista; IIRC, they did something similar in the past because, not surprisingly, a lot of people don't want to try out "the new cutting edge OS"--they want to use what they're familiar with and what all their local neighborhood geeks have years of experience dealing with).

      So, is it really newsworthy? I guess not. But, at least when in the future people talk about how "great Vista sales were" and "how unworried MS was", there's potentially a /. article (and more importantly, the knowledge of the existance of the contest) to at least point out that MS wasn't so comfortable as to do away with "a common business tactic". Or, perhaps people should rely less on news reports (which are inherently bias towards reporting what's new and what's unexpected) and more on the collective samplings of the rantings of the thousands of people who write blogs and other journals. But, then, that's not something you can trivially cite to prove a point about the state of the world at some time in the past. *shrugs*

      --
      Eurohacker European paranoia, gun rights, and h
    8. Re:Little slanted by Tom · · Score: 1

      It's not propaganda anymore than any advertising is propaganda. In other words: It is propaganda.

      [X] Fact

      Sales people learn the same stuff that politics students read about theoretically as the elements of propaganda.
      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  14. How Software Companies Die by lobiusmoop · · Score: 4, Funny
    --
    "I bless every day that I continue to live, for every day is pure profit."
  15. Not the first instance of lame MS marketting. by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 1

    Those of us who went to the Vans Warped tour last year will remember the Zune booth which gave out free Zune wristbands. Shame on Microsoft for not having a clue and shame on the Warped tour for being so blatently corporate whore.

    Oh, and nice try, Microsoft, but I'm not installing silverlight.

    1. Re:Not the first instance of lame MS marketting. by milsoRgen · · Score: 1

      Warped Tour has been a corporate shill for a loooooong time now. I still go every year tho, just to smoke cigarettes in front of the TheTruth.com bus... oh and some of the bands are alright.

      --
      I'm sick of following my dreams. I'm just going to ask where they're goin' and hook up with 'em later.
    2. Re:Not the first instance of lame MS marketting. by zrobotics · · Score: 1

      Warped tour? Corporate whore???

      Wait, you're talking about the Van's Warped Tour, right? As in Vans, the shoe manufacturer? The place with $3 bottles of water and $10 hot dogs? Sorry to break it to ya, but it's always been a moving musical advertisement. Just because Microsoft is involved doesn't increase the whore-ism level.

    3. Re:Not the first instance of lame MS marketting. by milsoRgen · · Score: 1

      The place with $3 bottles of water and $10 hot dogs? And don't forget about the 6 dollar cups of booze, coor's or bud! Two of the most lackluster beers money can buy!
      --
      I'm sick of following my dreams. I'm just going to ask where they're goin' and hook up with 'em later.
  16. I love vista & i love silverlight by jtsagata · · Score: 1

    That was a great way to express my fellings to M$. Let's try it. Hey i can't what is silverlight? Does it run on Linux?

    1. Re:I love vista & i love silverlight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup

  17. Good luck with your free shirt... by mythosaz · · Score: 4, Informative

    CONDITIONS OF ENTRY

    Instructions on how to enter form part of these Conditions of Entry. By participating in this promotion, entrants agree to be bound by these Conditions of Entry.

    You must be a Local OEM Channel Partner. Definition of a Local OEM channel partner ("partners") includes resellers and System Builders who resell other branded hardware (PCs and Servers) with Microsoft OEM Licenses or who build hardware to sell directly to end customers.

    Entry is only open to Australian residents residing in NSW, VIC, QLD, NT, or SA who are Microsoft OEM Channel Partners. The promotion commences at 09:00am (Sydney time) on Friday 14th December 2007 and closes at 11:59pm (Sydney time) on Friday 14th March 2008 ("Promotional Period"). The Promoter's decision in relation to all aspects of this promotion is final and no correspondence will be entered into.

    1. Re:Good luck with your free shirt... by urcreepyneighbor · · Score: 1

      That's disappointing. You can never have too many shirts.

      --
      "The fight for freedom has only just begun." - Geert Wilders
    2. Re:Good luck with your free shirt... by gmthor · · Score: 1

      You forgot one.... You need silverlight to be installed. This one got me.

      --
      How do I uncompress my MD5 archive?
    3. Re:Good luck with your free shirt... by vikstar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Had to install that Silverlight malware before I could read the terms and conditions. Damn, should've just read the /. comments first.

      --
      The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than the question of whether a submarine can swim.
    4. Re:Good luck with your free shirt... by neumayr · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Silverlight is malware? Does that accusation come with some kind of proof?

      --
      Truth arises more readily from error than from confusion. -Francis Bacon
    5. Re:Good luck with your free shirt... by snoyberg · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You forgot one.... You need silverlight to be installed. This one got me.

      You mean you're an Microsoft OEM builder in Australia, and you read Slashdot, and you were interested in the free shirt, but then after finding out you'd need to install yet another Microsoft product (after being an OEM builder mind you) you decided it wasn't worth it?

      --
      Thank God for evolution.
    6. Re:Good luck with your free shirt... by vikstar · · Score: 1

      Silverlight is malware? Does that accusation come with some kind of proof? Nope, sorry, I was just trolling because Microsoft was made me install Silverlight under false pretences, ie, before listing the terms and conditions of the application that required Silverlight. In all fairness, I had a quick look at Silverlight 2.0, looks good, includes the CLR and .NET framework 3.0 etc.
      --
      The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than the question of whether a submarine can swim.
    7. Re:Good luck with your free shirt... by gmthor · · Score: 3, Funny

      exactly ;)

      --
      How do I uncompress my MD5 archive?
    8. Re:Good luck with your free shirt... by snoyberg · · Score: 2, Funny

      I tip my hat to you good sir. Truly you are one of a kind.

      --
      Thank God for evolution.
  18. Cheat Sheet! No Silverlight Required! by milsoRgen · · Score: 5, Informative

    Windows Vista sold more copes than any other Microsoft Operating System (including Windows XP) In the first month following launch.
    (Fact) Fiction

    Windows Vista faces significant Compatibility issues with hardware devices.
    Fact (Fiction)

    Windows Vista faces significant issues in terms of integrating with other software applications.
    Fact (Fiction)

    Windows Vista delivers all new levels of security compared to previous Windows operating systems.
    (Fact) Fiction

    Windows Vista is expneisve to deploy and run.
    Fact (Fiction)

    Windows Vista hasn't been popular with businesses.
    Fact (Fiction)

    Windows Vista is unreliable and requires more technical support than Windows XP.
    Fact (Fiction)

    Microsoft has been swift to diagnose and rectify initial issues with Windows Vista.
    (Fact) Fiction

    Windows Vista can help deliver peace of mind for parents in terms of their children's online safety.
    (Fact) Fiction

    Windows Vista won't truly be ready until the first complete Service Pack is released.
    Fact (Fiction)

    Their answers, not mine!

    --
    I'm sick of following my dreams. I'm just going to ask where they're goin' and hook up with 'em later.
    1. Re:Cheat Sheet! No Silverlight Required! by KublaiKhan · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Cheat Sheet, Short form:

      Pick the answer that makes Microsoft look good.

      That sound about right?

      --
      In Xanadu did Kubla Khan
      A stately pleasure dome decree
    2. Re:Cheat Sheet! No Silverlight Required! by Akaihiryuu · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Wow...every single one of their "answers" is exactly wrong. I figured they'd toss in at least one or two that were real...but no!

    3. Re:Cheat Sheet! No Silverlight Required! by Dunbal · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Hey, McDonald's is suing a dictionary to try to get the definition of "McJob" changed. Corporate types thing they can push everyone around like they push their slaves. So in Microsoft's case, they are betting that the general public is just as greedy and dumb as their company is. Oh yes brainwash me for a shitty T-shirt made by kids in Malaysia and a one in a couple million chance of winning a $15k (retail) "home entertainment system". How about dropping the price of the OS to $30, and selling more copies?

      Idiots.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    4. Re:Cheat Sheet! No Silverlight Required! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So the answers in brackets should be discarded right?

      Hmm, there's no right answer for the last question :(

    5. Re:Cheat Sheet! No Silverlight Required! by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 2, Funny

      No kidding, it's like watching the White House press secretary.

    6. Re:Cheat Sheet! No Silverlight Required! by Drewmeister · · Score: 2, Informative

      Here's the quiz: http://www.microsoft.com/australia/vistafacts/fact.aspx

      I filled it out and will be getting my free shirt sometime. I only filled it out because of curiosity and I want that grand prize. At any rate, a bum should enjoy the free shirt I'll give him.

    7. Re:Cheat Sheet! No Silverlight Required! by milsoRgen · · Score: 4, Interesting

      How about dropping the price of the OS to $30, and selling more copies? Truth be told they should be selling the ultimate version for $100 bucks, that seems to be the sweet spot. And considering that price point has been used atleast since Ballmer was hawking Windows 1.0. We'd still be seeing a price break, once inflation is factored in. Which would be good for us, and they'd be fine. As the are shipping far more copies now than in the past.
      --
      I'm sick of following my dreams. I'm just going to ask where they're goin' and hook up with 'em later.
    8. Re:Cheat Sheet! No Silverlight Required! by Brian+Gordon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They're not all total BS. It's sold badly but compatibility is fine- blame Creative and ATI for being lazy and not making drivers on time.. Microsoft is definitely not at fault at all there, and anyway compatibility is fine now. Also (I work part time in Windows support), while Vista doesn't have anything like the massive toolset that developed over XP's unprecedented lifespan, Vista actually does tend to have less crazy things go wrong. I don't know why they're trying to discourage the myth of SP1 not solving all of vista's problem's though- since SP1 is coming out very soon they should probably be letting anyone who still thinks that continue to think that.

    9. Re:Cheat Sheet! No Silverlight Required! by Brian+Gordon · · Score: 1

      How does that not still require silverlight?

    10. Re:Cheat Sheet! No Silverlight Required! by Timothy+Brownawell · · Score: 5, Funny

      Windows Vista sold more copes than any other Microsoft Operating System (including Windows XP) In the first month following launch.
      (Fact) Fiction

      Sold more copies of what? XP?

      Windows Vista faces significant Compatibility issues with hardware devices.
      Fact (Fiction)

      It's the hardware devices that have Compatibility issues with Vista.

      Windows Vista faces significant issues in terms of integrating with other software applications.
      Fact (Fiction)

      Similarly, it's the applications which have trouble integrating with Vista.

      Windows Vista delivers all new levels of security compared to previous Windows operating systems.
      (Fact) Fiction

      How low can you go?

      Windows Vista is expneisve to deploy and run.
      Fact (Fiction)

      Compared to the hardware you'll need, the OS is downright cheap!

      Windows Vista hasn't been popular with businesses.
      Fact (Fiction)

      Microsoft is a business, and they certainly like it!

      Windows Vista is unreliable and requires more technical support than Windows XP.
      Fact (Fiction)

      This one's correct, because it is reliable -- reliably slow.

      Microsoft has been swift to diagnose and rectify initial issues with Windows Vista.
      (Fact) Fiction

      Due to the size of these issues, this "rectification" has produced many goatse look-alikes.

      Windows Vista can help deliver peace of mind for parents in terms of their children's online safety.
      (Fact) Fiction

      You can't get in trouble online if the computer doesn't work.

      Windows Vista won't truly be ready until the first complete Service Pack is released.
      Fact (Fiction)

      I'd say it'll take until the second or third.

      Their answers, not mine!

      But the snarky comments are all mine.

    11. Re:Cheat Sheet! No Silverlight Required! by Chysn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > Hey, McDonald's is suing a dictionary to try to get the definition of "McJob" changed.

      I'm familiar with this story, but followed your link anyway. Where do you get the idea that McDonald's is "suing" anyone?

      --
      --I'm so big, my sig has its own sig.
      -- See?
    12. Re:Cheat Sheet! No Silverlight Required! by Admiral+Ag · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Ugh... now that's desperate.

      Even though I am usually a pitiless and fanatical member of the Apple Hyper Commando Flame Unit in their Eternal War Against Evil (TM), this has gotten so bad that it is hard for me not to feel a bit sorry for the programmers who wrote Vista. It has to suck when you spend five years on something and pour your heart into it (as many no doubt did), yet poor management turns all your work into that.

      --
      "by that I mean people who don't sit on slashdot all day wondering why everyone else isn't building robots" DECS
    13. Re:Cheat Sheet! No Silverlight Required! by milsoRgen · · Score: 1

      How does that not still require silverlight? Because you are given the information most of us would want for a good laugh.
      --
      I'm sick of following my dreams. I'm just going to ask where they're goin' and hook up with 'em later.
    14. Re:Cheat Sheet! No Silverlight Required! by milsoRgen · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Ain't that the truth, I read a pretty good article that looked into the windows source code that leaked a while back. It appeared to be pretty well written code, and a lot of the comments lead one to believe the programmers were treated fairly well. I think the code that leaked was Win2k stuff, so what's happened since then is anyones guess.

      --
      I'm sick of following my dreams. I'm just going to ask where they're goin' and hook up with 'em later.
    15. Re:Cheat Sheet! No Silverlight Required! by Eskarel · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I've been using Vista for a while. So I'll weigh in on those.

      1) Don't know, don't care, the PC market now is vastly different than it was even when XP was released, comparing 1st month sales figures matters to accountands, but up or down don't say much about whether an OS is good or bad. You might possibly be able to compare 1st month non OEM sales, but even that wouldn't make a lot of difference.

      2) I haven't used every piece of hardware on the market, but personally speaking I've experienced more hardware incompatibility on Linux than on Vista. A couple of things didn't work right away, and a couple of things required work arounds, but the same has always been true of my Linux system, and at least Microsoft didn't shaft driver developers simply because they disapprove of the way they license their own product(see the whole GPL export debacle a few years back). Hardware compatibility is really a hardware vendor thing anyway.

      3)I do Integration work for a living and I don't even know what they mean by this one. I don't really want to integrate my OS with applications, I just want them to run. Do they mean that older applications don't take advantage of Aero or something? If you can explain this one to me, I'd be happy to hear it.

      4) The Vista security model is substantially better than the XP security mode, and if we stopped blaming the UAC nags on Microsoft and instead pointed the finger at the lazy software developers who won't right their Windows App code to run in user space instead of as an admin we'd be a lot closer to the truth.

      5) In a business environment deploying an new OS or OS version is expensive, and licensing is rarely the largest portion of that. I suppose if you were running your XP machines with Automatic update on pointing directly at windows update instead of at a SUS server, the activation requirement could be expensive or tedious, but that's a relatively small subsection of businesses really.

      6) Any new version of anything is unpopular with some parts of business, making a major change to the environment is expensive and risky. My company is just upgrading to XP now, so it's relative popularity in business is really only important to accountants.

      7) Haven't really noticed this much, there was a period back last year when they patched it a bit and it got less stable, but aside from the fact that your regular IT people are less familiar with the interface and so it's a bit harder for them to find stuff, it's not been much more difficult for me. In my experience the OS is rarely the cause of support calls anyway. Most issues are with third party apps, spyware, data corruption etc, and 2000 and XP had plenty of wierd it's easier to wipe the system than fix it bugs too.

      8) Matter of opinion really I've never found anyone who believed that a developers response time was quick enough, and as I've not been sitting waiting with baited breath for a patch on Vista yet I can't realy talk about the response time. SP1 is taking a while, but that's a big patch set.

      9) Total garbage, but no more garbage than any other claim by any government, third party vendor, OS manufacturer, or anything else. No content filtering system is effective, and unless you plan on running your home network like a corporate LAN you're not going to stop your kids from looking at what they want to look at, and even then you're not likely to stop them.

      10) If you're not running a bleeding edge environment(which applies to 99% of the corporate world) waiting for a new version of anything to get patched a few times isn't a bad idea. Vista's not worthless pre SP1, but it'll presumably be better post SP1.

      A lot of this quiz is marketing spiel, and I hate market droid speak as much as everyone else, but Vista has been the victim of the greatest FUD campaign I've ever seen for software, so maybe they needed market spiel.

    16. Re:Cheat Sheet! No Silverlight Required! by MichaelTheDrummer · · Score: 5, Funny
      No, you have to look at the wording of the question more carefully:

      Windows Vista won't truly be ready until the first complete Service Pack is released.
      Clearly, this means there will be at least a second service pack before Vista is actually ready! :P
    17. Re:Cheat Sheet! No Silverlight Required! by SoundGuyNoise · · Score: 1

      And this concludes this week's edition of the Opposite Sketches.

      --
      You never expect irony, do you?
      Want to be a professional wrestler? Visit www.iyfwrestling.com
      @iyfwrestling
    18. Re:Cheat Sheet! No Silverlight Required! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pretty good. Or, you could just pick the opposite of whatever Slashdot says, since that algorithm is "whatever makes Microsoft look bad".

    19. Re:Cheat Sheet! No Silverlight Required! by Tired+and+Emotional · · Score: 1
      So, are you telling us it doesn't crash less often?

      Though I must say I find Windows XP pro to be very reli~~!!~~$$^G

      --
      Squirrel!
    20. Re:Cheat Sheet! No Silverlight Required! by spir0 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      or, more appropriately,

      pick the answer that is blatantly wrong.

      --
      The reason girls and Windows users don't understand UNIX is because all the documentation is in Man files.
    21. Re:Cheat Sheet! No Silverlight Required! by chromatic · · Score: 1

      ... at least Microsoft didn't shaft driver developers simply because they disapprove of the way they license their own product(see the whole GPL export debacle a few years back).

      Nit: the kernel developers disapprove of people changing the license on derivative works of the Linux kernel.

    22. Re:Cheat Sheet! No Silverlight Required! by Tolkien · · Score: 4, Funny

      Their answers, not mine!
      Wow. They got every answer wrong on their own test!
    23. Re:Cheat Sheet! No Silverlight Required! by popmaker · · Score: 1

      "Windows Vista is expneisve to deploy and run."

      Their questions too? Sheesh, no wonder their code is buggy.

    24. Re:Cheat Sheet! No Silverlight Required! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Duhhhh, I heard that!"

      Hey, what the h--- IS Silverlight, anyway? Sounds suspiciously like Cloverfield.

    25. Re:Cheat Sheet! No Silverlight Required! by dkh2 · · Score: 1

      All of the 'correct' responses are favorable to Microsoft. Duh.
      (Fact) Fiction

      What would you expect? It's a marketing piece.

      --
      My office has been taken over by iPod people.
    26. Re:Cheat Sheet! No Silverlight Required! by walbourn · · Score: 1

      It's so nice to see a post in a /. thread on Vista from someone who actually has a clue what the hell they are talking about because they use the software before expressing opinions about it.

    27. Re:Cheat Sheet! No Silverlight Required! by Simulant · · Score: 1

      ...they patched it a bit and it got less stable...

      I installed SP1 RTM on my 4 month old Vista box a few days ago and I've been getting two or three blue screen crashes per day ever since. This is on a work machine which basically runs Outlook, Firefox, and a bunch of command prompts, explorer windows, putty sessions, and remote desktop sessions. Nothing too fancy going on here except maybe Sidebar and Aero (which I've only turned back on since installing SP1... Aero does seem snappier when the machine is not bluescreening on me...) Ironically, the blue screens seem to coincide with Outlook activity though I can't be positive at this point.

      I've got a Nforce motherboard and Quadro graphics so I'm going to assume, for the time being, that Nvidia's got some of those driver issues that are causing Microsoft to delay the release.

      This does not bode well though... and I wasn't impressed to begin with. I've got that ME feeling all over again.

    28. Re:Cheat Sheet! No Silverlight Required! by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      4) The Vista security model is substantially better than the XP security mode, and if we stopped blaming the UAC nags on Microsoft and instead pointed the finger at the lazy software developers who won't right their Windows App code to run in user space instead of as an admin we'd be a lot closer to the truth.

      How about also at those lazy Microsoft developers who enabled this behavior?

      But more relevantly, if they were going to break so much compatibility anyway, why not go whole-hog? Wrap the old Win32 API up in a compatibility layer like Wine, require new apps to include the I_AM_VISTA_COMPATIBLE flag (or whatever). Then, nag once for the old apps before you sandbox them (to encourage developers to adopt the new standard), and pop up as many nag screens for the new apps as you like (as they won't generally popup nag screens in the first place).

      Also, if I understand it, Vista's security model is, at a low level, identical to XP. At a high level, it's a ripoff of the Unix sudo model (as used by OS X and Ubuntu), only much more annoying.

      I've never found anyone who believed that a developers response time was quick enough, and as I've not been sitting waiting with baited breath for a patch on Vista yet I can't realy talk about the response time.

      Fair enough, but you can't really call it "swift", considering the things which still haven't been patched. It's been a year, right? Do they still have that audio-slows-down-the-network bug? What about the bug where disabling the indexing service will cause the start menu's instant-search to bring the machine to a grinding halt? Or maybe everyone's favorite, the click-drag-move-or-copy-can-run-out-of-RAM-while-estimating-how-long-it-will-take bug.

      I haven't paid attention, so I wouldn't be surprised if some of those were gone, but last I checked, they were still happening, for months. How the hell is this thing not caught in testing? Maybe a lot of them were caught in the public beta, and ignored?

      When any ONE thing of this magnitude happens with an open source app, the latest version is temporarily taken down, preventing people from upgrading (unless they want to compile it themselves) until the problem is fixed.

      9) Total garbage, but no more garbage than any other claim by any government, third party vendor, OS manufacturer, or anything else.

      "Everyone else does it" does not make it less garbage, however.

      A lot of this quiz is marketing spiel, and I hate market droid speak as much as everyone else, but Vista has been the victim of the greatest FUD campaign I've ever seen for software, so maybe they needed market spiel.

      "FUD campaign" implies a deliberate attempt to spread misinformation to cause fear, uncertainty, and doubt. I don't think Vista needed any help doing that, and there's really almost no organized FUD behind it, anyhow -- unless you count the "You are coming to a sad realization" Mac ad.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    29. Re:Cheat Sheet! No Silverlight Required! by ncc74656 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It's sold badly but compatibility is fine- blame Creative and ATI for being lazy and not making drivers on time.. Microsoft is definitely not at fault at all there, and anyway compatibility is fine now.

      Try telling that to my parents, whose HP printer and scanner won't work with the copy of Vista that was preinstalled on the Dell they bought a few months ago. There's nothing wrong with the hardware, but because the Win2K/XP drivers for those devices won't work with Vista and HP hasn't gotten around to writing Vista drivers for them (and, in the case of their ScanJet 4p, probably never will), they're stuck with some POS Dell all-in-one that should work with Vista, but usually doesn't because of the craptastic drivers that came with it.

      (If there's a silver lining in here, it's that they won't ever buy a Dell again. I tried talking them into buying a Mac, but they wouldn't listen to me. Dad was worried about not being able to open Office files; that there are plenty of apps for the Mac that open Office files (including...um...Office itself) didn't appear to register.)

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    30. Re:Cheat Sheet! No Silverlight Required! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nit: the kernel developers disapprove of people changing the license on derivative works of the Linux kernel.


      A derivative work is a work that includes pieces of an earlier work:
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Derivative_work

      Nit: What pieces of the Linux kernel are contained in hardware drivers?
    31. Re:Cheat Sheet! No Silverlight Required! by empaler · · Score: 1

      Hey, what the h--- IS Silverlight, anyway? Sounds suspiciously like Cloverfield. It's Flash, only without Macrovision/Adobe
    32. Re:Cheat Sheet! No Silverlight Required! by pembo13 · · Score: 1

      So how comes it is Linux's fault when hardware doesn't work?

      --
      "Thanks for all the money you paid to us. We've used it to buy off ISO among other things" -Microsoft
    33. Re:Cheat Sheet! No Silverlight Required! by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Their answers, not mine!

      The ones not in parenthesis?

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    34. Re:Cheat Sheet! No Silverlight Required! by Draek · · Score: 1

      Clearly, this means there will be at least a second service pack before Vista is actually ready! :P

      Well, that *was* the case after all with Windows XP, and many would argue, with 2000 as well, so I think it's fair to assume it'll be the case now too.

      --
      No problem is insoluble in all conceivable circumstances.
    35. Re:Cheat Sheet! No Silverlight Required! by Nikker · · Score: 1

      You're lucky you posted that as AC ....

      --
      A loop, by its nature, continues. If that didn't make sense, start reading this sentence again.
    36. Re:Cheat Sheet! No Silverlight Required! by JohnBailey · · Score: 1

      Windows Vista won't truly be ready until the first complete Service Pack is released. Fact (Fiction) Their answers, not mine! Correct answers outside brackets I assume.
      --
      It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his job depends on not understanding it.
    37. Re:Cheat Sheet! No Silverlight Required! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Windows Vista is expneisve to deploy and run.
      Fact (Fiction)


      I assume you copied and pasted all this rather than typing it all in - does this MicroSoft not have spell-check?

    38. Re:Cheat Sheet! No Silverlight Required! by Intrinsic · · Score: 1

      Win2k was the first (fairly) stable os from microsoft. I actually liked 2k, xp improved on that a bit.

      I installed vista for a week or so. I liked aero. But the slow copying, and inability to access certain parts of the file system without doing a "Take Ownership" operation was completely out of control.

    39. Re:Cheat Sheet! No Silverlight Required! by chromatic · · Score: 2, Informative

      What pieces of the Linux kernel are contained in hardware drivers?

      That would be Linux-specific headers and all executable code in them that isn't strictly part of POSIX, Bobs.

      Take an out of tree kernel driver. Compile it against Linux kernel headers. Then compile it against a clean-room reimplementation of the same headers. Now compare the resulting binaries.

      If the binaries are bit-for-bit the same, then the binary is not a derivative work of the Linux kernel, and you can make the legal argument that you can redistribute it without any GPL concerns. If there's even a bit of difference, then the binary is a derivative work of at least the kernel headers, and their copyright terms apply to the binary.

      The derivative work status of the driver source code is another matter -- but if companies distributed that source code, few people would complain.

    40. Re:Cheat Sheet! No Silverlight Required! by Tom · · Score: 1

      Wow! I'm astonished at their honesty.

      Just for clarification: The (bracketed-in) answers are the wrong ones, aren't they?

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    41. Re:Cheat Sheet! No Silverlight Required! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Interesting premise. Microsoft changes something and existing hardware doesn't work. Obviously, the compatibility problem is the hardware vendors. They have an obligation to devote R&D dollars to make Microsoft look good. They even have an obligation to pay Microsoft to certify and sign their new drivers. Hint: Even if new drivers were created it would still mean that Vista was incompatible with existing systems. Fixable incompatibilities are still incompatibilities.

    42. Re:Cheat Sheet! No Silverlight Required! by jimicus · · Score: 1

      In a business environment deploying an new OS or OS version is expensive, and licensing is rarely the largest portion of that. I suppose if you were running your XP machines with Automatic update on pointing directly at windows update instead of at a SUS server, the activation requirement could be expensive or tedious, but that's a relatively small subsection of businesses really.

      I would point out that Microsoft probably don't have a clue how widely deployed Vista is in business. Because businesses aren't going to the local PC World and buying 100 copies of Vista off the shelf - they're paying an annual fee to run Windows, and Microsoft are probably including everyone who's paid for Software Assurance in the list of "businesses which have licensed and therefore, we assume, deployed Vista".

    43. Re:Cheat Sheet! No Silverlight Required! by Bertie · · Score: 1

      I don't believe that, considering I saw a poster in the McDonald's at Gatwick Airport inviting people to work for them, which described the "benefits" on offer, finishing with the payoff line "Not bad for a McJob."

    44. Re:Cheat Sheet! No Silverlight Required! by BadOPCode · · Score: 1

      Okay... as one of the sucker OEMs. I can explain how #1 question became true. It has little to do with users as hardly anyone USES Vista except for pirates. It set a record sells because OEMs and retailers had to make a entire shelf for Vista and all its flavors. Vista Home, Vista Home Premium, Vista Business, Vista Ultimate Supreme Pizza with Olives. Don't forget you have to stock 32 bit, 64 bit and 64 and 32 bit versions. Each level had a different price tag. In general a small system builder or retailer likes to keep around about 5 copies of any one version. You do the math. How many people (actual users) bought Vista? To date, one person. But I have gotten numerous work from people back when the big OEMs were forcing people to buy Vista with a new computer, downgrading to XP and its inspired a lot of folks to switch to Linux. With needing only a little encouragement i've switched a lot of people to Ubuntu. So... #1 record sells IN THE FIRST MONTH. Ya, I believe it. I can show you a shelf I have of the dust collecting Vista. This is a VERY short term effect. OEM's and Retailers aren't buying any more. The users don't want it.

    45. Re:Cheat Sheet! No Silverlight Required! by alexhs · · Score: 1

      You mean the selected "right" answer is the one between brackets ?
      I thought the one in brackets was the one discarded...

      --
      I have discovered a truly marvelous proof of killer sig, which this margin is too narrow to contain.
    46. Re:Cheat Sheet! No Silverlight Required! by Brian+Gordon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yup. Microsoft signficantly overhauled for the better a lot of antiquated interfaces like the audio stack.. there's no way old drivers are going to just work. Hardware vendors are welcome to choose to not support vista at all, but they're going to have no OEM customers since a lot of the system builders are going Vista-only. But if a hardware vendor doesn't make vista drivers, it's their problem not microsoft's.

    47. Re:Cheat Sheet! No Silverlight Required! by bcmm · · Score: 1

      Interesting points, but please stop using "user space" to sound clever when refering to matters relating to users. It doesn't mean what you think it means.

      --
      # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i llama
      Damn, my RAM is full of llamas.
    48. Re:Cheat Sheet! No Silverlight Required! by tsa · · Score: 1

      I had the same thing with my parents. They wanted a laptop, and my father was scared of the Mac. He didn't want two different systems in the house. Now they have Vista and XP, and I got them Office 2007 :)
      To be fair, my mother wanted a 15" laptop and a MBP (which I have) was far too expensive for them. So they bought a nice HP. And from what I've seen, Vista is not that bad. It's just amazing how slow it is. That will have cost MS quite a few problems, getting it to be that slow.

      --

      -- Cheers!

    49. Re:Cheat Sheet! No Silverlight Required! by Elbowgeek · · Score: 1

      Indeed, this hits at my perception of MS: They actually have dedicated programmers who are very talented, but are driven by management and marketing created in the image of Ballmer. If given the opportunity, the programmers could create an OS which is actually quite usable. But with Linux and Unix variants abounding and well-proven and understood over the decades Windows itself seems redundant. Does Windows truly offer any architectural advantages over *nixes which would be utterly impossible to code into them? I honestly think not, frankly.

      Someone correct me, but if they migrated towards a Unix base for Windows, as Apple did for theirs, they would be best served. This will never happen of course, but I do believe the future belongs to the nixes.

      --
      Who is this delectable creature with an insatiable love of the dead?
    50. Re:Cheat Sheet! No Silverlight Required! by Jesus_666 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, we have to admit that Vista does offer improved security. (You are trying to insert a line break. [Cancel] [Allow])
      There is a faint chance that someone will be able to tell a bad application's UAC warnings apart from those of a good application. (You are trying to insert a line break. [Cancel] [Allow])
      (You are trying to insert a line break. [Cancel] [Allow])
      I think UAC might reduce the danger posed from worms etc. by at least an infinitesimal amount. (You are trying to click a button. [Cancel] [Allow]) (The button you have clicked might do something, such as submitting data to a remote server. [Cancel] [Allow]) (UAC will display a warning message now. [Okay]) (You are possibly trying to submit data to a remote server. If this is not the case, please click Cancel immediately. [Cancel] [Allow])

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    51. Re:Cheat Sheet! No Silverlight Required! by freeweed · · Score: 1

      But if a hardware vendor doesn't make vista drivers, it's their problem not microsoft's.

      Sometimes it's nice to see that it's not just us Linux users that have this issue. ;)

      --
      Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
    52. Re:Cheat Sheet! No Silverlight Required! by jonaskoelker · · Score: 1

      Their answers, not mine!
      No, yours are the unparenthesized ones, right? ;-)
    53. Re:Cheat Sheet! No Silverlight Required! by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > But if a hardware vendor doesn't make vista drivers, it's their problem not microsoft's.

      You mean it's the hardware vendor's _fault_, not Microsoft's.

      It's the _customer's_ problem to figure out what's compatible with what before they buy, and if they don't bother then it's their problem to figure out how to deal with the results. If they aren't sufficiently educated about the relevant issues to actually know what the problem is, then they're generally going to blame the thing they just got, since what they already had worked fine before. That means if they buy new hardware that doesn't work with their existing software, they're usually going to blame the hardware, but if they buy new software that doesn't work with their existing hardware, they're usually going to blame the software.

      And that makes it Microsoft's problem, even if it's not their fault. Hence, the question on the quiz. I doubt that's an effective means to deal with the problem, of course, since small-time system builders like the quiz targets have no significant influence on what hardware drivers do or do not get written.

      What they should be doing is offering the hardware vendors concessions or deals or something to support Vista more completely, e.g., after such-and-such a date you can only get the cheapest OEM price for Vista if you have working Vista drivers for all of the hardware you've sold in the last five years.

      Or they could write the drivers themselves. Other OS makers have been known to take that approach. It would require significant resources, but Microsoft has significant resources. But I tend to think they could get better results faster and cheaper by incentivising the hardware vendors.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
  19. I'd give up 30 minutes of my time by Scoutn · · Score: 0

    for the chance to win a home theatre package worth $15K. Too bad it's only for Local OEM Partners. (Being Canadian doesn't help either, heh.)

  20. Vista isn't so bad by LM741N · · Score: 4, Informative

    I've got a triple boot laptop: Vista, FreeBSD, OpenBSD. I only ever had one problem with it and it was fixed- the USB subsystem blue screen. Most of my old programs run on it unless they have some funky driver.

    But I customized it so perhaps I just don't see any of the problems. My screen looks like Win2K and all the eye candy and crap is turned off. And I have yet to see any Ultimate Extra that is anything more than a screen background.

    One thing that is useful is to download "Server Tools". With it you get a utility that will make bootable iso DVD's. Otherwise I just make DVD's in FreeBSD.

    Instead of Gates doing the "Wow" thing, he should have just stuck to the features.

    1. Re:Vista isn't so bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So you took away everything (that you could) that made it vista, and it's not so bad.

      That sounds about right.

    2. Re:Vista isn't so bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A guy that can triple-boot his laptop and prefers Windows Classic over other Windows themes is not the core market for Microsoft.

    3. Re:Vista isn't so bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A guy that can triple-boot his laptop and prefers Windows Classic over other Windows themes is not the core market for Microsoft. I beg to differ. That type of guy is the kind of guy that might buy the more expensive Windows Server 2008, which uses the same core as Vista (with Service Pack 1) and uses the Windows Classic UI by default.
    4. Re:Vista isn't so bad by Tom · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Instead of Gates doing the "Wow" thing, he should have just stuck to the features. He did. So much that he couldn't let go of them and that's why none of them was actually implemented in Vista.

      Didn't someone post a list a while ago, where it shows that the number of features removed from Longhorn before it became Vista is actually longer than the number that remained?
      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    5. Re:Vista isn't so bad by irc.goatse.cx+troll · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty much the same way with my XP install, I think the OS is more of a bootstrap to get you your OS (once you replace software components you dont like, install new things to do tasks you otherwise would have done differently, rethemed things, etc). The only thing you really miss by using different bases is hardware support, package management, init management, and software support.

      I do have a question though, what do you find brings you to boot openbsd or freebsd? When I last ran them they were so similar that I'd be hard to find a reason to want to switch from one to the other at boot time. Maybe for software testing if you're a developer, but for that I'd think virtual machines would work better.

      I know I used to dualboot xp/linux (after many years of being linux only, with some bsds thrown in there for good measure).. After a few months I never really felt like booting into linux as I could do everything I wanted in windows.

      --
      Pain lasts, kid. Its how you know you're alive. Sometimes I think this growing up thing is just pain management-TheMaxx
  21. Why would I want a Vista T-Shirt? by InsMonkey · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Vista is such a steaming pile of 5hit. Why would I want to wear a shirt with that on it?

    --
    I'd rather have a full bottle in front of me than a full frontal lobotomy.
    1. Re:Why would I want a Vista T-Shirt? by Hucko · · Score: 1

      humour.

      --
      Semi-automatic amateur armchair Australian philosopher; conjecture ready at any moment...
  22. It's like one of those "best mix" radio stations by Fear+the+Clam · · Score: 3, Funny

    that secretaries listen to that suck so much that they have to give away money every hour to get people to listen.

    Microsoft: The most free money every hour!

  23. Fact or fiction by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Funny

    This test is interesting enough to clog your system with silverlight.

    [ ] Fact
    [x] Fiction

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:Fact or fiction by Jugalator · · Score: 4, Funny

      This quiz will change people's perceptions of Windows Vista.

      [ ] Fact
      [x] Fiction

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    2. Re:Fact or fiction by Nimey · · Score: 1, Funny

      This sentence is false.

      [X] Fact
      [X] Fiction

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    3. Re:Fact or fiction by Aenoxi · · Score: 1

      You Cretan!

      --
      "The sum of all knowledge does not imply the knowledge of all sums" Kurt Gödel (paraphrased)
    4. Re:Fact or fiction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a pointless troll.

      [x] Fact
      [ ] Fiction

    5. Re:Fact or fiction by rasputin465 · · Score: 1

      If you answer any of the questions incorrectly, Steve Ballmer will come to your house, strangle your cat, and defecate on your keyboard.

      [x] Fact
      [ ] Fiction

    6. Re:Fact or fiction by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      If you answer any of the questions incorrectly, Steve Ballmer will come to your house, strangle your cat, and defecate on your keyboard.

      Ain't it enough that his system defecates on some people's hardware? Does he really have no shame?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  24. but wait! its all true! by mugnyte · · Score: 2, Insightful


      All of the "facts" are true, and yet Vista is still a slow giant that doesn't play well with others and needs an uber-machine to accomplish basic feats.

      Comon' guys, the market isn't saying these criticisms based on fictional accounts - they bought/used Vista and it sucked as an experience.

      And PLEASE, give up on the Aero-is-cool stuff. You are playing catchup on the desktop - by far. You've simply been in GDI for so long you can't see the irony of cheering about abandoning it now.

      Give your user support offices that "quiz" and listen for laughter.

  25. No, 100% safe. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If Microsoft Marketing was running an airline, it would be 100% safe! Zero crashes. Because no Microsoft aircraft would work well enough even to taxi on the runway.

    Have you ever talked with Microsoft marketing people? Every day they have to go to work and pretend that they are doing something positive for a company that pretends to sell quality products. They pile fantasies on fantasies. They live in a world of unreality.

    Microsoft marketing people are far scarier than zombies. Zombies have more respect from the universe; they were at one time at least allowed to die.

    Like zombies, MS marketing people also have no will of their own; they are automotons of corporate speak, which is a language that no one understands, including themselves. But they wander the earth undead, believing that they are human, believing that they have jobs.

    Okay, some of this may not be completely true. However, I'm not sure what or how much.

    1. Re:No, 100% safe. by Otter · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Okay, some of this may not be completely true. However, I'm not sure what or how much.

      I'll give it a shot:

      • That you've ever met a Microsoft employee, or anyone in the computer industry besides a Best Buy cashier: Fiction
      • That you sincerely think you're impressing us by providing a Wikipedia link to "zombie": Fact
      Do I win a t-shirt?
    2. Re:No, 100% safe. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If Microsoft Marketing was running an airline, it would be 100% safe! Zero crashes. Because no Microsoft aircraft would work well enough even to taxi on the runway. Heh, you don't know how true that is. My entire Vista experience comes down to the Vista installer crashing on startup. I never even got to the UI to install Vista. And this on a machine that runs XP flawlessly!

      Gotta love MSDN lab subscriptions! After that experience we decided it wasn't worth the effort to test under Vista when none of our customers are planning on touching Vista for the foreseeable future.
    3. Re:No, 100% safe. by TheVelvetFlamebait · · Score: 1

      Every day they have to go to work and pretend that they are doing something positive for a company that pretends to sell quality products. They pile fantasies on fantasies. They live in a world of unreality.
      But they are doing something positive for the company, and Microsoft does make some quality software. It's just much of what they tout as quality software isn't nearly as good as they say it is.
      --
      You know, there is a difference between trolling and pointing out the flaws in your reasoning. Just saying.
    4. Re:No, 100% safe. by nschubach · · Score: 1

      They live in a world of unreality.


      Oh...so they are all the people that keep playing Second Life! Now I understand.
      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    5. Re:No, 100% safe. by canuck57 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Have you ever talked with Microsoft marketing people?

      Sure did, and was sharp that day.

      We were at an internal technology presentation, showing off what we do. Being security, we had our BSD, UNIX loggers and appliances on screens for everyone to see. We had a "tail -f syslog" and other logs just a moving every bad event across the screen in real time. Many called it similar to matrix.

      Along comes the CFO and the Microsoft sales guy. And asked me, I haven't seen that before what is it. I said it was OpenBSD firewall logs on the vendor net. He said "OpenBSD what? That isn't an OS, is it? BSD what? Is that LSD?" with a smile (He knew).

      I looked at our CFO and said, OpenBSD, the operating system we use to keep our Microsoft systems from getting wormed, infected and controlled by others. We also use it for firewalls, detection and system login because they cost less, run longer and don't requires the costly hand care to keep them going as does Microsoft Windows. We don't have the staff, software or capital budget for Microsoft.

      Rubbed it right in. My manager heard from the CFO 2 days later, he was impressed and got a second tour with my manager. And a budget increase and authorization to use BSD and open source, in writing to the executive staff.

    6. Re:No, 100% safe. by David+Gerard · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You must read this.

      --
      http://rocknerd.co.uk
  26. Link? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't find this.

    Anyone have a link?

  27. The fscking thing didn't even work by Werrismys · · Score: 0, Redundant

    "Silverlight?" WTF?

    --
    'Once scientists, even the dim-witted social scientists, get muzzled, the Western Civilization is finished.' - oldhack
  28. What's with it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think the thing is buggy. When you had to choose which version for the person, I couldn't click on anything but Vista Ultimate.

  29. From the makers of Eduganda... by owlnation · · Score: 1

    ...Quizaganda.

  30. The cock rub and crow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How long before Microsoft's popularity dips so low they decide to change their name?

    Think "Splenda" for something which rots your dick upon contact.

  31. Terms and conditions by onk · · Score: 1

    I like that you have to accept their terms and conditions before playing.

  32. It's a Silverlight app by schickb · · Score: 5, Funny

    I love how the silverlight download wants me to run silverlight.exe to install it... on my Linux box. Probably not going to work. How about some better user-agent checking with a message like: "For your own good, please go away. We are only planning to provide half-baked implementations and lip-service to non-Microsoft platforms".

    1. Re:It's a Silverlight app by YaroMan86 · · Score: 1

      Linux barely even gets lip-service from what I can tell. No Silverlight for Linux, though there's Moonlight, but I'm pretty sure MS has nothing to do with it. NO LIP SERVICE FOR YOU!

    2. Re:It's a Silverlight app by Shados · · Score: 1

      Actually, they've been "Helping" with it (whatever that means), and blogging about it and publishing books that refer to moonlight all over the place. Its just that moonlight is silverlight 2.0, while only silverlight 1.0 is fully done (Moonlight just follows the specs as they come, as far as I can tell)

    3. Re:It's a Silverlight app by schickb · · Score: 1

      I'll believe that when it ships and when it lasts for more one or two releases. At one point IE was going to be fully implemented on Linux (also with "help" from Microsoft).

    4. Re:It's a Silverlight app by Shados · · Score: 1

      Well, right now Moonlight is actually -ahead- of Silverlight 2.0, funny enough.

      That said, I've never heard of the IE thing...do you have any doc about that? I'm genuinly curious. That must be quite the funny read.

    5. Re:It's a Silverlight app by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've never heard of it, either. Maybe he was thinking of IE for Unix, or IEs4Linux.

    6. Re:It's a Silverlight app by YaroMan86 · · Score: 1

      Frankly, I'm glad that never came to fruition. I don't like Internet Explorer, security issues notwithstanding (Though that is a big part of it.).

  33. Ooh, Prizes! Can I have the Fast Boot one? by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    And maybe it would be nice if my OS didn't take twice as long to accomplish the same basic task while you're at it ...

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  34. User Agent by JonathanR · · Score: 1

    Make sure you complete the quiz from your Linux box (or use the User Agent Switcher add-on under Firefox)

    1. Re:User Agent by milsoRgen · · Score: 1

      Do you got the add User Agent details I need for that?

      --
      I'm sick of following my dreams. I'm just going to ask where they're goin' and hook up with 'em later.
  35. Help by robertjw · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Can somebody help me? I'm trying to complete the quiz, but I'm having trouble installing this sliverlight stuff on my Linux box and getting the site to work under Firefox.

    If I could just finish the quiz I might ditch Slackware and move to Vista!

    1. Re:Help by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know that the above is a joke... But there is an answer to this... Try Moonlight

      http://www.mono-project.com/Moonlight

  36. Fun by whitehatlurker · · Score: 4, Funny
    Okay, so I went and installed silverlight to try this out. They won't let you give a "wrong" answer.

    Q: Vista faces significant compatibility issues with hardware devices
    A: Fact!
    MS: Are you 100% sure? We supported 1.4M devices at launch and have doubled that number since then. Are you sure
    YES / NO
    A: YES
    MS: You're wrong WRONG! WRONG! Too stoopid to have a computer TRY AGAIN
    Q: Vista faces significant compatibility issues with hardware devices

    I'm sorry Dave, I can't let you do that.

    --
    .. paranoid crackpot leftover from the days of Amiga.
  37. The shirt's source pattern? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    You want the shirt's 'source pattern'?  Here you go.  I ... uhh ... reverse engineered it:

    ####
    ####
    ####

    1. Re:The shirt's source pattern? by Crunchie+Frog · · Score: 2, Funny

      Dont listen to this AC, it's a stitch up!

      --
      --- Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity
    2. Re:The shirt's source pattern? by dotancohen · · Score: 0

      ####
      ####
      ####
      At least the code is well commented.
      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
  38. Silverlight by Kamineko · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm not too familiar with this 'Silverlight'.

    Is it equally devastating to both werewolves and vampires?

    1. Re:Silverlight by geekoid · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yes. Also Browsers.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Silverlight by Kamineko · · Score: 1

      That's good to know. I always had trouble trying to pick him up by his tail and whirl him around into those bombs at the edge of the arena.

    3. Re:Silverlight by Thwomp · · Score: 1

      Undoing moderation. God damn ajax moderation! I meant to select 'Funny'. Honestly.

  39. Pick the one that makes you laugh by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 1

    ... or cry.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
  40. Text quoted from the Silverlight quiz applet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Text quoted from the Silverlight quiz applet...

    How to Play

    Fact or Fiction is designed to test your knowledge of the Windows Vista operating system. There are 18 questions in total, and you must answer every question correctly in order to go into the draw to win.

    Here's how to get started:

    1. Accept the competition terms and conditions.
    2. Select the button below to start playing.
    3. For the first 10 questions -- `Bust Myths'.
      1. You will be presented a statement
      2. Select either the `fact' or `fiction' button
      3. On some occasions you may receive a `hint' -- and be asked to confirm your answer. Select either `yes' or `no'
      4. If your answer was correct, you will automatically proceed to the next question. If your answer was incorrect, you will have the option to try again
    4. For the remaining eight questions `consultation test' there are a total of four short video clips to watch. You will be asked two questions based on the content in the video clips. The questions will appear under the video clip and the answer options will be displayed to the right of the page.
      1. The first question will require you to select three options from a possible list of six
      2. After selecting the three items, press the `submit answer' button or you can select `clear' and start selecting your answers again
      3. If your answer is correct, you will proceed to the next question
      4. If your answer is incorrect you will be asked to `try again'
    5. Once you have successfully completed all 18 questions you will be asked to register your details.
  41. Got them all correct by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I actually got them all correct. It is nice to see that you also included the wrong answer in parentheses.

  42. Exchange rate by fabu10u$ · · Score: 1

    AUD 15000 = USD 13486.50

    --
    They say the mind is the first thing to ... uh, what's that saying again?
  43. Fact or Fiction? by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 3, Funny

    Where's the CowboyNeal option?

  44. ----0-0-0000--0---- fun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    telegram poie

  45. Re:you 1nsensitive clod! by Vectronic · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Yeah man, you said it...

  46. prior art by Tablizer · · Score: 0, Troll

    I think MS got the idea from the Philipean religious community: "Be nailed to a cross for $5,000!"

  47. Cute! by GodOfCode · · Score: 1

    Sort of cute, isn't it? However, I think it is definitely a step in the right direction. MS Vista is a bad OS but is really not as bad and unusable as it is made out to be.

  48. Best prize? give Vista users Mac OS X by wardk · · Score: 1

    that's the best give microsoft could ever give, a ticket out of windows.

  49. t-shirt? by keith_nt4 · · Score: 1

    Free t-shirt? Vista is the greatest!!

    --
    "UNIX is very simple, it just needs a genius to understand its simplicity." -Dennis Ritchie
  50. Just a ploy to promote silverlight by f4hy · · Score: 0

    Isn't this just a quiz? What reason would there be to require users to install silverlight just to answer yes/no questions. I can't access it as my OS is not supported but is there any reason the quiz couldn't just use a check box and a next button?

  51. Very misleading by Infonaut · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The Fact or Fiction site was put together by Microsoft Australia for "technology professionals" and aims to help Windows tech experts sell Vista to their customers. This is not oriented toward the general public, and frankly it doesn't look "desperate" to me.

    Sure Vista has been a disappointment, but not everything Microsoft does is evidence of this.

    --
    Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ
    1. Re:Very misleading by hughk · · Score: 1

      Interestingly enough I was on holiday in Oz last November. I overheard some non-computer types discussing problems with Vista and how the store would install the latest XP instead.

      This may be old news to many people here but to hear the great unwashed talking of the issues with Vista amused me. This adds up to a major perception problem wit the vendor.

      --
      See my journal, I write things there
  52. Why dont they drop the marketing for reality... by stylemessiah · · Score: 1

    That site has been around for weeks........... Why dont they juts have the following on the page: Is it true that Microsoft Vista sucks ass (oh and disable the No button so even Microsoft cant generate phantom positive responses) Meanwhile for the T-Shirt, i submit: Microsoft Vista Im not the only thing thats bloated.....

  53. australia only by dreohio99 · · Score: 1

    for australia only :(

  54. Yup, real experience. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I've met Microsoft Marketing employees, that's what I was talking about. I was just trying to describe what I saw. My sense of horror was stronger than I am able to put into words, however.

    Suppose you had a job, but what you did in your job didn't actually benefit your company. And your company was adversarial toward its customers, as much as possible, so that, even if you did benefit your company, you would being doing harm in the world. How would you describe that?

  55. First prize is a copy of Vista by sizzzzlerz · · Score: 5, Funny

    Second prize is two copies.

    1. Re:First prize is a copy of Vista by stylemessiah · · Score: 1

      Technically two copies of Vista in a house constitutes a virus infection.

  56. Must be a slow news day by davmoo · · Score: 0

    Give it a fucking rest already people.

    Right now, I have 4 systems running at my desk. A desktop running Vista (that I'm typing this on), another desktop running Leopard, a laptop running Mandriva 2008, and another laptop running XP. And ya know what? They all have their problems. The Leopard box and the Mandriva box have locked up as many times as the Vista and XP box. My Vista box runs for weeks at a time without reboot, its stable, and I use it (and compile software on it) every day. It, like the XP box, has never had a virus, adware, or malware on it, nor do I run eleventybillion packages of "protection" software on them...I use intelligence and common sense when I surf and read email. The only hardware compatibility issue I've had with any of the boxes is its apparently a bitch to find a Mac-compatible sound card without spending bags of money.

    Everyone claims Linux and Macs "just work". Funny...I see just as many pleas for help in all the Mac and Linux magazines and web forums as I do in the Vista and XP magazines and forums.

    If you don't like Vista or it doesn't work for you, fine, run something else. Get what works for you and makes you happy. But the constant Vista/Microsoft bashing (mostly, or so it seems, from people who don't actually use it) when Linux and OS X have their issues too is getting tiresome.

    --
    I want a new quote. One that won't spill. One that don't cost too much. Or come in a pill.
    1. Re:Must be a slow news day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aww diddums, did some mean person say something horrid and nasty about your favouwite OS? There there, no need to get cry. Just yell upstairs and Mommy will make you a nice cup of get the fuck over yourself.

  57. Vista is FAIL! by readgs · · Score: 2, Funny
  58. Re:Cheat Sheet! Vista Most Prized?? by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    Aside from ms orifice and maybe hex-box, how can they NOT fight for saving vista, however dim the view ahead? After all, since they're adding prizes to the gimmickry to generate uptake....the money they sunk into it makes it their most... ummm.. "prized POssession", or OBsession or CONfession...

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  59. An Ignorant Buffoon has qualified by david_craig · · Score: 5, Funny

    I actually did this a while back (the promotion has been running since December 2007 IIRC). They send both a shirt and a certificate (as a Vista certified salesperson) to whatever name you fill in the form. I did it several times with the names "A Retarded Monkey", "Someone Brain-damaged", etc.

    I have a certificate on my wall that states "This certifies that An Ignorant Buffoon has reached the level of excellence to qualify as a Vista Certified Salesperson".

    (I'm paraphrasing as I'm not in the office at the moment).

    1. Re:An Ignorant Buffoon has qualified by totally+bogus+dude · · Score: 1

      Pictures or it didn't happen!

      (Seriously, can you post a pic next time you're bored at the office?)

  60. thanks by dwater · · Score: 1

    > Every person who submits ... [gets] the chance to win a $15,000 prize.

    So, you post it on /. just to lower the odds.

    Cheers, mate >:

    --
    Max.
  61. It's not all BS by WK2 · · Score: 1

    Windows Vista delivers all new levels of security compared to previous Windows operating systems.

    True. "Cancel or Allow" is certainly a new level of security.

    Windows Vista can help deliver peace of mind for parents in terms of their children's online safety.

    Safety? Probably not from Microsoft. Peace of mind? Depends how gullible the person is.

    Windows Vista won't truly be ready until the first complete Service Pack is released. (Fiction)

    Could be fiction. Define "complete".

    Thanks for the questions. I wanted to take the quiz, but I got an error when I tried to run the file. "bash: cannote execute binary file"

    --
    Write your own Choose Your Own Adventure. http://www.freegameengines.org/gamebook-engine/
  62. Re:I went to Camp Microsoft... Did u tell them: by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    "Rilly Sabbit! Kixs are for TRIDS!!"??

    Or, um, I meant... "Silly Rabbit! TRIX are for KIDS"??

    Maybe ms should eat Lucky Charms or Total, or Gain or Alpo?

    Wait, they can sell 3 licenses to each employee, and inflate their uptake counts. Or, put windows on floppies, err, umm, DVDs like AOL did its warez on CD...

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  63. Translations: by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Windows Vista sold more copes than any other Microsoft Operating System (including Windows XP) In the first month following launch.

    Fact. Translation: We've gotten better at force-feeding upgrades to people. In the past, it was actually possible to buy a computer with the previous version of Windows in that first month.

    Windows Vista faces significant Compatibility issues with hardware devices.

    Fiction. Translation: We consider any hardware that doesn't have a "Works with Vista" sticker on it to be insignificant.

    Windows Vista faces significant issues in terms of integrating with other software applications.

    Fiction. Translation: Windows Vista is not an application, it's an operating system. Therefore, we squeak by on a technicality.

    Windows Vista delivers all new levels of security compared to previous Windows operating systems.

    Fact. Translation: We're more secure from bad press, because we can always say "They clicked allow at some point! Don't you know you were supposed to click 'deny' on that one?"

    Windows Vista is expneisve to deploy and run.

    Fiction. Translation: There's no such word as "expnesive". Alternate translation, in case the typo was only the parent post: It's only expensive once you actually want to use it for something. But if "deploy" counts as part of a new computer, and "run" counts on booting up, it's dirt-cheap!

    Windows Vista hasn't been popular with businesses.

    Fiction. Translation: It's been popular with some businesses, like MSN and NBC! No one said anything about Vista being popular with all businesses, or even a majority of businesses!

    Windows Vista is unreliable and requires more technical support than Windows XP.

    Fiction. Translation: The only tech support you need with Vista is "Here's a copy of XP!" That's a lot less time on the phone! Ok, yes, Vista is unreliable, but didn't you notice that's an AND statement? If either half of the statement is Fiction, the whole statement is Fiction!

    Microsoft has been swift to diagnose and rectify initial issues with Windows Vista.

    Fact. Translation: "Swift" is relative, but yeah, we have been working our asses over here -- mostly because there were so goddamned MANY initial issues with Windows Vista!

    Windows Vista can help deliver peace of mind for parents in terms of their children's online safety.

    Fact. Translation: Parents are so easy to fool. Heh heh.... Wait, did I say that out loud?

    Windows Vista won't truly be ready until the first complete Service Pack is released.

    Fiction. It will take much more than one service pack to fix it.

    *vomits*

    Seriously, how can anyone write this bullshit and not actually throw up? I'm having a hard time holding my dinner down, and at least I'm writing satire, not outright lies!

    --
    Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
  64. Not all wrong... by Ken_g6 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    This one was right:

    Windows Vista delivers all new levels of security compared to previous Windows operating systems.
    Vista includes new levels of security for the both the MPAA and the RIAA!
    --
    (T>t && O(n)--) == sqrt(666)
  65. Alternate prize! by stylemessiah · · Score: 1

    How about you get WinFS and all the other components promised, but never shipped, and dropped.... Microsoft, what sort of arseclown do you want to be today?

  66. Marketing 101 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I know, I know; it's not an OS, it's a POS! But buy it anyway. Here's a T-shirt!"

    That'll work!

  67. Holy shit by Fordiman · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Dude, the waft of bullshit coming off that quiz is unbearable. I couldn't get past the first part because I couldn't stop clicking the wrong thing.

    Almost none of the statements on that quiz were 'fact' or 'fiction'; they were mostly opinions that differ based on your needs for a computer.

    Security, for example: Sure, Vista has the 'protect the user from himself by continually asking if he really wants to X' features, but I'd be happier with licensing agreements for bundling in AVG and Spybot, both as low priority scheduled tasks (better integration, of course, but basically the same system I use to keep my friends and clients from calling me every twenty minutes saying they've contracted a virus).

    Compatibility: sure, Vista supports '2.2 million products', but that's still less than what XP supports. Why don't they have a compatibility layer for legacy devices? Is it that damned hard?

    I could go on.

    The point is, if you value intellectual honesty, you can't even pass the first question.

    --
    110100 1101000 1101000 1100110 0 1101111 1101000 1100011 1
    1. Re:Holy shit by SEMW · · Score: 1

      Security, for example: Sure, Vista has the 'protect the user from himself by continually asking if he really wants to X' features, but I'd be happier with licensing agreements for bundling in AVG and Spybot I'm sorry, but a background antimalware scanner is no substitute for properly enforced privilege seperation -- c.f. Linux and OS X. Which is not to say that it's 'worse' or 'better' in any meaningful sense, since it's not a question of one or the other; they serve different purposes. A knowledgeable user can get by fine just with good security policy (a firewall, privilege seperation, keep everything updated, and don't download crap off the net); but for less knowledgeably users, you want both.
      --
      What's purple and commutes? An Abelian grape.
    2. Re:Holy shit by Fordiman · · Score: 1

      And I agree, totally. UAC is no substitute for kdesu.

      The problem is that, if you're not an Admin in Windows, you might as well throw out your computer. It's just not designed for user-casting in the way of the sudoer.

      --
      110100 1101000 1101000 1100110 0 1101111 1101000 1100011 1
    3. Re:Holy shit by SEMW · · Score: 1

      And I agree, totally. UAC is no substitute for kdesu. I don't understand your point. UAC and kdesu work pretty much identically if you run as a standard user, and solve exactly the same problem.

      The problem is that, if you're not an Admin in Windows, you might as well throw out your computer. It's just not designed for user-casting in the way of the sudoer. Umm, huh? True, Windoes XP wasn't designed for sudoesque user-casting, but Vista is, using something called UAC -- you must have heard of it, you mentioned it in your previous paragraph...
      --
      What's purple and commutes? An Abelian grape.
  68. Re:but wait! its all true! by ricebowl · · Score: 1

    All of the "facts" are true, and yet Vista is still a slow giant that doesn't play well with others and needs an uber-machine to accomplish basic feats.

    C'mon guys, the market isn't saying these criticisms based on fictional accounts - they bought/used Vista and it sucked as an experience.

    And PLEASE, give up on the Aero-is-cool stuff. You are playing catchup on the desktop - by far.

    You appear to be talking to Microsoft. They're probably not listening but, anyways, it was this that caught my eye:

    You've simply been in GDI for so long you can't see the irony of cheering about abandoning it now.

    I always assumed they were more akin to Nod...must...stop...playing...C&C...

  69. Where was I? Australia. by LrdDimwit · · Score: 2, Funny

    Truly, you have a dizzying intellect.

  70. Re:Cheat Sheet! Vista Most Prized?? by webmaster404 · · Score: 1

    That, is the sad truth. When MS released ME, they at least had the NT Windows getting ready for XP, with Vista, there doesn't seem to be any new technology to save MS. With all the delays that it took getting Vista out, I doubt that we will see NT 7 betas until 2010 at the earliest. About all MS can do is clean up the bloat with a few service packs and take out the DRM and speed up the OS or release a version of Vista: Light that will work on normal hardware and not require a $600+ computer to work well on.

    --
    There is no "disagree" moderation, and troll, flamebait and overrated are not valid substitutes
  71. Sold more copies by symbolset · · Score: 1

    Sold more copies of what? XP?

    To be fair, I'm sure they've sold a ton of copies of the license sticker.

    All of them stuck to PCs running XP.

    They can call that a win if they want to but it's not a win for Vista.

    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.
  72. Re:Cheat Sheet! Vista Most Prized?? by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    But, isn't the wasteful demand for 2GB RAM and 2GHz CPU what differentiates Vista from KDE/Linux?

    Granted, I don't even have 3D/Compiz/Beryl in my KDE on my new Gateway P-6301 (2 GB system RAM, with 384 of it to the Intel X3100+ (shared card, so probably the bane of my laptop's existence as goes 3D), but maybe it's just the driver I'm using), but for KDE and other Linux GUIs to not demand what ms is doing with vista speaks volu... umm, SCAN-LINES.

    And, to have Vista get better hard disk throughput virtualized in VirtualBox than on native hardware only shows (to me) that ms from some point decided to drive people to shell out dollars for the sheer support of the hardware industry.

    I think if ms wants to survive as far as vista goes, they better pull an AOL: give it away on DVDs, but in cereal boxes, shoe boxes, and even with his/her Viagra SUBscriptions, PROscriptions, INscriptions and CONscriptions. This cannot be good at ALL for msoft.

    It will be even WORSE for ms if LINUX DVDs are given away in cereal boxes, shoe boxes, and, well, ...

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  73. What to do with your shirts. by gnutoo · · Score: 5, Funny

    Donate your shirt to charity. Your feelings will go like this:

    • Actually receiving your shirt after suffering through 30 minutes of Silverlight dribble - neutral.
    • Cleaning your closet of dated shirts that make you look old or gullible - satisfying.
    • Giving those shirts to charity so some kid can groove on the pretty colors and designs - very satisfying.
    • Seeing all the local pan handlers in MSFT shirts - priceless.

    Living well is good revenge. Being kind can be better. You will never get back the time you wasted but someone can make good use of the results.

  74. Silverlight by Hucko · · Score: 1

    The silverlight plugin won't work on wine.... Ahh weeellll....

    --
    Semi-automatic amateur armchair Australian philosopher; conjecture ready at any moment...
  75. Re:Cheat Sheet! Vista Most Prized?? by webmaster404 · · Score: 1

    think if ms wants to survive as far as vista goes, they better pull an AOL: give it away on DVDs, but in cereal boxes, shoe boxes, and even with his/her Viagra SUBscriptions, PROscriptions, INscriptions and CONscriptions. This cannot be good at ALL for msoft.

    They already have, its called P2P networks, truthfully, thats how MS is surviving, via OEM editions and getting marketshare via "pirated" Windows, when they collapse due to MS's lawsuits its going to be funny to watch MS's marketshare drop like a rock.
    --
    There is no "disagree" moderation, and troll, flamebait and overrated are not valid substitutes
  76. silverlight required by jack455 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I would've read and watched their propoganda for a chance to win but silverlight is required and I have no interest in ruining the internet. Yes, I could've turned on my Ubuntu PC instead which even has IE7 (as a joke really, I hope my sites break on IE7) and then installed the Novell version of silverlight (is it finished?) but that's also not going to happen. FU MS and Miguel

  77. Windows Blista could be Windows 3.1... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With a new desktop theme for all my 10,000 customers care. They're not going to deploy it anyway.

    Put whatever sticker you want on it. Just give them an XP image preinstalled so they can get their work done. They genuinely (genuine?) don't care what's in Vista any more.

    No Vista last year, no Vista planned this year. Vista pilots dying on the vine from loss of volunteers so probably no Vista next year. Every developer they interview that claims the ability to port their apps to Vista is a drooling idiot. Three year OS cycle. Math: remember it?

    Cue Verizon commercial: "Can you hear me now?"

    High point of my day: High level customer asks out of the blue: "so... we're not thinking about it because we're a Microsoft shop, but if we were... can you support linux?" Of course I said "Server to desktop, Infrastructure, Architecture and Services. Seven courses from soup to nuts, that's us! Of course we can."

    1. Re:Windows Blista could be Windows 3.1... by Brian+Gordon · · Score: 1

      Is this some kind of bizarre poetry?

  78. Probably still fiction... by Nick+Driver · · Score: 1

    Windows Vista won't truly be ready until the first complete Service Pack is released.

    That one will probably still be fiction even after the 1st service pack.

  79. Re:you 1nsensitive clod! by genericpoweruser · · Score: 0

    I'm afraid the rest of us are out of LSD.

    --
    A fool and his lamb are worth two in the bush.
  80. The reference you're looking for is by symbolset · · Score: 1

    The Iraqi Information Minister

    Be sure to check out the Treasury of deathless quotes. It's like a Microsoft Vista press release except because it's happening to somone else it's funny instead of sad.

    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.
  81. Speaking of indoctrination... by smitth1276 · · Score: 1

    FTA: "Every person who submits themselves to Microsoft indoctrination..."

    Coming from Slashdot, of all places, that is some really rich irony, right there. Funnier, still, is the fact that most slashdotters are actually not smart enough to realize it.

  82. Hi. I'm a stay at home Mum by KalgarThrax · · Score: 1

    And I have been paid twenty five quid to scorch my children with the unholy fire of Microsoft's Vista marketing.
    *starts sweating*
    Marketing executives, marketing executives, marketing executives!
    *wild look in the eyes*

  83. Windows 2000. by sr180 · · Score: 1

    Silverlight will install and run on Windows 2000. [ ] Fact [x] Fiction

    --
    In Soviet Russia the insensitive clod is YOU!
  84. Fixing technical issues by Wolfier · · Score: 1

    with social means is doomed to fail, at least in the technical sense.

  85. Re:The whole site will be like this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Oh, ROFL, I get the dollar signs. Yes, clever. You're a riot. Too bad you post at -1... oh wait.

  86. liesense by ihatethetv · · Score: 1

    be careful they only license you the shirt, with the ability to take it back at any time.

  87. It's called propaganda. by edunbar93 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I seem to recall a particularly interesting technique for indoctrination done to prisoners of war in some communist country somewhere, whereby the prisoners would be rewarded (with a better meal, I recall - a big deal when most everyone is malnourished) by competing in a competition to come up with the best communist slogan or advertising campaign, or what have you. The contest would be held on a regular basis too, and so the inmates would compete with ever more ferocity.

    This didn't just turn the winners into good communists (and coming from their enemies in war, that too is a big deal) but *everyone else too*! It was a particularly effective method of indoctrination.

    --
    "No problem. I have the capacity to do infinite work so long as you don't mind that my quality approaches zero."-Dilbert
    1. Re:It's called propaganda. by MagicBox · · Score: 1

      Wait a minute? Are you comparing Microsoft to communists? And you are from which camp? The Open Source? Fuck, that's quite ironic isn't it?

      --

      The phaomnneil pweor of the hmuan mnid. Fcuknig amzanig eh!
  88. Re:Cheat Sheet! Vista Most Prized?? by Bonobo_Unknown · · Score: 1

    You raise an interesting point. When MS realised they couldn't continue with the 3.1 series of windows (3.11, 95 etc) they bought NT. Now that they've so thoroughly killed all their OS competition there is nothing waiting in the wings ready to be bought out and branded with the MS logo.

    It's an oversimplification but and interesting idea.

    --
    We don't believe in radical loony monotheistic religions from the middle east -- we're Christians.
  89. Some states are more equal than others... by zognik440 · · Score: 1

    Give that 99.999999999999999999% of competitions on the net are only for americans I was looking forward to entering for atleast a chance in the $15,000 worth of stuff. Then I learn it's not only closed to most people BUT even if u are a system builder it's not open to people in Western Australia. For those not in the know, thats Australia's largest state which also has the biggest economy... nice one to alienate a 'state load' of people microsoft.

  90. Free shirt? by phalse+phace · · Score: 1
    I want a free shirt......

    To poop on.

  91. luck involved by Tom · · Score: 1

    So, in addition to the chance game that running Vista is, they've now added a game of luck that involves just knowing about it?

    Seems you have to be one lucky dude to get anywhere in microsoft territory.

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  92. Yeah, they NEED TO USE silverlight... by octogen · · Score: 1

    ...because they can't even type in some 300 lines of plain old HTML 4 code without messing it up:

    http://www.microsoft.com/australia/vistafacts/vista.aspx

    This page is not Valid HTML 4.01 Transitional!
    Result: Failed validation, 12 Errors

    (validator.w3.org)

  93. Oblig: Dilbert reference by AgentPhunk · · Score: 1

    (Sign over Marketing Department): Two Drink Minimum

  94. Other condition by CarpetShark · · Score: 1, Interesting

    You must not be microsoft certified, as you'll realise just how similar this indoctrination is to the one you sat through to get your Microsoft(tm) permission to work in IT.

  95. It's all a conspiracy, maaaaaaaaan! by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

    apparently the SilverLight installer is just some shady .exe Ho ho... but seriously- great idea:-

    1) Create quiz so crap that everyone talks about it (but not so bad that it's obviously intentional).

    2) Geeks want to see what quiz is really like (and quite honestly won't reject the chance to win $15,000 if it's going anyway).

    3) Geeks happy because they think they got one up on The Man by not taking his quiz seriously. MS laughs because they got them to install Silverlight which was the main idea all along.
    --
    "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  96. Moderation by CarpetShark · · Score: 1

    I see this is getting marked as a troll. Fair enough, if that's your opinion, BUT... it's my opinion that moderators should have actually done the certification before saying that, or THEY are the ones with a bias.

  97. Look... by Fuzzypig · · Score: 1

    I used to hate MS on principle, but I've no longer got anything against MS or their O/S's, they simply aren't my cup of tea anymore. Sorry MS but gimmicks like this just make them look silly and very, very desperate, maybe not to Johnny Saturday Shopper, who doesn't really care about what his PC does, but I've made a choice to join the Ubuntu/Linux crowd, the O/S just suits me better. I like the fact that it simply works and I can get my hands on oodles of great software for nothing, with no guilt and no silly nag-screens asking for payment. Ubuntu simply ask that I pass it along to all my friends. Above all I like the fact that the "company" who supplies my O/S has some integrity and care to try to make this world just a little bit easy to get along in.

    --
    Windows guys please stop pissing on everyone and the Linux guys stop pissing in the wind, hoping to hit Windows guys!
  98. What I find amazing is by Toreo+asesino · · Score: 1

    ...that this site will probably convince some people that Vista is, oh I dunno, just as compatible and industry tested as XP. Which it isn't, blatantly (even if it's no where near as terrible in reality as some of the people make out on this site).

    Yup, I too nearly hurled when taking "the test", and I work with Microsoft tech every day and quite enjoy it. But, this type of marketing will no doubt end up in the inbox of some CIO followed shortly by an order to "Roll out Vista now, it's ready for prime-time!".

    As laughable and lamentable as this is, it will increase Vista sales. Microsoft are a very calculating company, do not underestimate that.

    --
    throw new NoSignatureException();
  99. Iraqi Information Minister by daveewart · · Score: 1

    I haven't heard such a blatantly unbelievable set of lies since the Iraqi Information Minister was on...

    --
    "If you think the problem is bad now, just wait until we've solved it." --- Arthur Kasspe
  100. Did anyone else... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    laugh out loud when they read that?

    Seriously, by now those who have had poor experiences with Vista and gone back to XP are not likely to go back to Vista and the general buzz with Vista now is that it's "OK". Nothing wrong with being "OK"...

    Personally, my Dell Inspiron 1500 laptop with a Sempron 1.8GHz (512K L2 Cache), 1GB DDR2 RAM, and ATi Express 1150 graphics CAN play World of Warcraft at decent frame rates in XP, but CAN'T play at playable frame rates with Vista Home Basic. Boot time is also a whopping 12 seconds slower with Vista! So, for me it makes more sense to use Windows XP, because in practice it does perform better on my hardware. With my Core2 desktop (ASUS P5K-VM motherboard, 2GB DDR2 RAM, 8600GT) would run Vista just fine, but I already own Windows XP for it and it makes me happy (I don't have any DX10 games and don't really want any - I'm so old...), so I really don't have any compelling reason to upgrade to Vista. In fact, the only thing that would get me to upgrade to Vista is if there was a REALLY fun game that I absolutely had to play, but even then I'd probably just hack it to work on XP to save the $125.

    Suck it up Microsoft, Vista isn't for everyone and XP was a decent product.

    I should add that my other computers run Kubuntu, Slackware, Fedora, and OS/2 Warp Ver3...

  101. MicroBorg by molex333 · · Score: 1

    Resistance is futile.....You Will Be Assimilated!!!!!

    --
    Somewhere in a dark place you will find:
    www.m1
  102. Get The Facts Campagn by greedyturtle · · Score: 1

    Hey, maybe they'll give free Tux shirts for reading through their Get The Facts on Linux campaign FUD.

  103. A fun new game by greedyturtle · · Score: 1

    Do the second section with your sound turned off!

  104. Moonlight by SEMW · · Score: 1

    The silverlight plugin won't work on wine.... Ahh weeellll.... Linux native port of silverlight, courtesy of the Mono project, here.
    --
    What's purple and commutes? An Abelian grape.
    1. Re:Moonlight by Hucko · · Score: 1

      And I don't want to touch it. For something like this, I'd rather play with a mouse trap than a match stick because I know what I'm getting myself in for.

      --
      Semi-automatic amateur armchair Australian philosopher; conjecture ready at any moment...
  105. EE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the same way the evil empire gives gifts to those who insult me and dont allow me to live in peace :)

  106. Do I understand correctly? by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    That's funny.

    He is making jokes about this Microsoft web page: Microsoft SQL Server 2008 Roadmap Clarification. That web page is the finest, the very finest baloney artistry:

    "The past few months have been an amazing time for the SQL Server team as we gear up for the start of the global launch wave on February 27. ...

    ... "To continue in this spirit of open communication, we want to provide clarification on the roadmap for SQL Server 2008. Over the coming months, customers and partners can look forward to significant product milestones for SQL Server. Microsoft is excited to deliver a feature complete CTP during the Heroes Happen Here launch wave and a release candidate (RC) in Q2 calendar year 2008, with final Release to manufacturing (RTM) of SQL Server 2008 expected in Q3. Our goal is to deliver the highest quality product possible and we simply want to use the time to meet the high bar that you, our customers, expect.

    "This does not in any way change our plans for the February 27 launch and we look forward to seeing many of you in Los Angeles and other events around the world."

    Do I understand correctly? There is a "global launch wave" of the new SQL server version in Los Angeles on February 27, and people are traveling there for that event. But Microsoft won't actually deliver the new SQL server until 7 months later, or maybe after that? What is a feature-complete "CTP"? There is a childish ceremony celebrating the fact that programmers at Microsoft actually delivered something, called "Heroes Happen Here"?

    However, that's a Microsoft Marketing person being sneaky and dishonest and living in a world of Microsoft Marketing fantasy. "To continue in this spirit of open communication..." Hah!

    That's not what I was talking about in my grandparent post. I was talking about something even more scary than that: Microsoft Marketing Zombies say things that are completely irrelevant, and no one listens to them anyway. They are the undead. But everyone pretends that they are actually alive.

    Microsoft is at least not killing Iraqis and pretending that killing Iraqis will make them less violent.

  107. ObFenyman by Haelyn · · Score: 1

    For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over
    public relations, for nature cannot be fooled.

  108. Thank God!!! by jskline · · Score: 1

    Thank God and the heavens above that I no longer am working in an environment that requires me to support Vista! What a pile of garbage that thing is. Don't want it and even now Dell's line of computers that I would like to have is now forbidden because they only sell it with Vista. Screw em'. I'll just build a box that fits what I need and put what I want on it.

    --
    All content in this message is copyright (c) 2008. All rights reserved. RIAA is prohibited here.
  109. and your point is... by jargon82 · · Score: 1

    http://slashdot.org/ This page is not Valid HTML 4.01 Transitional! Result: Failed validation, 7 Errors http://kernel.org/ This page is not Valid HTML 4.01 Transitional! Result: Failed validation, 6 Errors http://wikipedia.org/ This page is not Valid HTML 4.01 Transitional! Result: Failed validation, 15 Errors http://www.fsf.org/ This page is not Valid HTML 4.01 Transitional! Result: Failed validation, 27 Errors Lets not forget, though... http://www.microsoft.com/en/us/default.aspx This page is not Valid HTML 4.01 Transitional! Result: Failed validation, 29 Errors

    1. Re:and your point is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some time back, I took a four-paragraph Microsoft Word document and saved it in Microsoft's XML format. I then opened it up in IE, which was supposed to be able to display the document structure. It was unable to. Opening up the 'XML' file as a text file, in the one four-page document, there were 23 separate violations of the XML specification for document structure... all of which were Microsoft-specific 'extensions' that bound the document formatting into the XML document... which is, again, violating the principle of XML's separation of content and appearance.

  110. WOOOo Free shirt by Holi · · Score: 1

    Oh no, not for me, it's for system builders and OEMS only.

    Sorry guys this is a no go for the most of us.

    (Actually I used to be a system builder so I could do this but I already have an xbox 360 and I don't need a new tv)

    --
    Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
  111. !hypocrisy by dustmite · · Score: 1

    I especially admire the fact that you got modded up for bashing Microsoft when you use Windows on your computer.

    It's only the poor who truly know what poverty feels like. :-)

    While it is possible to avoid using Windows, it's quite exceptional - most of us end up using Windows because one way or another, network effects push us into it (e.g. "my customers use it", "my employer insinsts on it because his/her customers use it", "my gran uses it" etc.).

  112. Height of hubris by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is it just me, or is it the absolute height of hubris for Microsoft to be putting up a contest that is essentially one long Microsoft ad, using proprietary "Silverlight" technology that requires the user to be already running Windows? It won't be very persuasive for someone running Win2K, 98, Linux, BSD, etc. to use Vista if they can't even see the advert.