Slashdot Mirror


Happy Pi Day

Jonathan writes "Today, the 14th of March, is Pi Day 2008. Pi Day is internationally celebrated in honor of the mathematical constant "Pi," who's actual value will — now and forever — remain unknown. NeoSmart Technologies has a run-down on the history of Pi, Pi Day, and the significance of Pi and other such "magical numbers" to science and technology. 'Pi isn't just a number that you can use to calculate circle-related mathematics, it's a symbol of something by far greater. Pi is one of many "magic" numbers that are found everywhere — if you know where to look. These magic numbers can't be explained, they just are. And if you use them right, they make it a lot easier to do a lot of really complicated things... In a way, they're a testimony to technology and computers (or vice-versa, depending on how you look at it).'"

351 comments

  1. Happy pi day everyone!! by Brian+Gordon · · Score: 2

    Happy pi day :) :)

    1. Re:Happy pi day everyone!! by Brainless · · Score: 4, Funny

      Screw Pi day, come on Steak-n-BJ Day!

    2. Re:Happy pi day everyone!! by eln · · Score: 5, Funny

      Sorry, but we missed Pi day by a longshot. Having Pi day on any old 3/14 lacks sufficient precision. Pi day was on March 14, 1592. Pi second would have been March 14, 1592 at 6:53 and 58 seconds in the morning. I'm sure they were partying like it was 1599 on that day.

    3. Re:Happy pi day everyone!! by Naughty+Bob · · Score: 2, Funny

      This should have been posted at 1h59m26s past midnight.

      --
      "Be light, stinging, insolent and melancholy"
    4. Re:Happy pi day everyone!! by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 5, Funny

      Screw Pi day, come on Steak-n-BJ Day! I'm married, you insensitive clod!
      --
      Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    5. Re:Happy pi day everyone!! by hansamurai · · Score: 5, Funny

      Tomorrow is the Ides of March, where I will pretend I'm well versed in Shakespeare.

    6. Re:Happy pi day everyone!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Screw Pi? Why sure, I'll have a slice.

    7. Re:Happy pi day everyone!! by Brian+Gordon · · Score: 1

      ...26545... the 26 would round up to 27.

    8. Re:Happy pi day everyone!! by s13g3 · · Score: 1

      Once more into the breach, dear friends, once more,
      Or close up the equation with a logical end!

      --
      "Inveniemus Viam Aut Faciemus" 'We will find a way... Or we will make one!' --Hannibal of Carthage
    9. Re:Happy pi day everyone!! by ArcherB · · Score: 4, Funny

      Screw Pi day, come on Steak-n-BJ Day! I'm married, you insensitive clod! Then I guess you are looking forward to chicken and masturbation day!

      --
      There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
    10. Re:Happy pi day everyone!! by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but we missed Pi day by a longshot. Having Pi day on any old 3/14 lacks sufficient precision. Pi day was on March 14, 1592. Ja, but trouble is, if you're going to cite issues of precision you'd have to put the date in proper order. That being the case, Pi day would more appropriately be 314/1/5--- Jan 5, 314 (at 9:26am).
      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    11. Re:Happy pi day everyone!! by holden+caufield · · Score: 1

      "Friends, Romans, Countrymen, lend me your ears" would be more appropriate than quoting Henry V

      And I believe it's "unto the breach"

      --
      I'll create an amusing sig when I have something meaningful to post.
    12. Re:Happy pi day everyone!! by CensorshipDonkey · · Score: 1

      ... and the problem is?

    13. Re:Happy pi day everyone!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ohh chicken! that is a reason for celebration

    14. Re:Happy pi day everyone!! by PlatyPaul · · Score: 3, Funny

      Sadly, I used to live in a state where every day in March was nearly Pi Day....

      --
      Misery loves company. Online misery loves unsuspecting random strangers.
    15. Re:Happy pi day everyone!! by eikonoklastes · · Score: 1

      Linky to a very appropriate Toothpaste For Dinner comic. I suspect most people here are dicks.

    16. Re:Happy pi day everyone!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do you know it's chicken and masturbation day? It's a day that ends in 'y'!

    17. Re:Happy pi day everyone!! by Mateo_LeFou · · Score: 1

      woot, chime in below if you're celebrating bday today. Alas I'm not, as I had my wisdom teeth out yesterday. ick

      --
      My turnips listen for the soft cry of your love
    18. Re:Happy pi day everyone!! by fezwang · · Score: 1

      Yess!!! Thanks for making me laugh out loud! And good luck in your pursuits, fellow husband!

    19. Re:Happy pi day everyone!! by lgw · · Score: 5, Funny

      "At least I got chicken."

      (not what Leroy Jenkins actually said, but it's still the meme.)

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    20. Re:Happy pi day everyone!! by UncleTogie · · Score: 1

      ...and now, an obligatory quote from the Revenge of the Nerds:

      Hair Pi!

      --
      Don't tell me to get a life. I'm a gamer; I have LOTS of lives!
    21. Re:Happy pi day everyone!! by Rungi · · Score: 1

      Gadzooks!

    22. Re:Happy pi day everyone!! by bigstrat2003 · · Score: 1

      The "proper" order is relative to where you live, imo. So, for those of us living in the US, the proper order isn't what you list. If you live elsewhere, then the proper order is going to be different depending on local custom.

      --
      "16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
    23. Re:Happy pi day everyone!! by ma1wrbu5tr · · Score: 1

      by who's calendar?
      This discussion is a testament to how many nerds have too much time on their hands.

      --
      Why can't we go back to using jumpers to configure slot adapter cards? Why? I say!
    24. Re:Happy pi day everyone!! by Trillian_1138 · · Score: 1

      Steak-and-BJ? How 2003. This year it's Cupcake and Shut The Hell Up Day!

      -Trillian

    25. Re:Happy pi day everyone!! by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1
      Screw Pi? Why sure, I'll have a slice.

      Are you sure you have the right thread?

    26. Re:Happy pi day everyone!! by kramulous · · Score: 1

      But some of us don't use MMDDYY format. Hence, we don't get Pi day. Unless you want:
      3rd of January,
      31st of April (1st of May)

      Awe shit, who said it had to be the first three digits? It could be anywhere in the number, hence everyday is Pi day!
      I'd like to see you prove me wrong.

      --
      .
    27. Re:Happy pi day everyone!! by ehrichweiss · · Score: 1

      It's better if it is "Shut the hell up, Cupcake" Day.

      --
      0x09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688C0
    28. Re:Happy pi day everyone!! by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      Ummm, the year doesn't come first either. I belive that by 'proper order' the GP meant easily sortable by a computer (this being a geek site and all that).

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    29. Re:Happy pi day everyone!! by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      wives are like gas stations. Some are full service, some are partial service, and some make a guy to be self-service.

    30. Re:Happy pi day everyone!! by bigstrat2003 · · Score: 1

      Touche, I got mixed up cause there were lots of people saying that the proper way was how it's done abroad.

      --
      "16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
    31. Re:Happy pi day everyone!! by celtic_hackr · · Score: 1

      Julius Ceasar, in which case beware the Ides of March.

      I will be celebrating Snake Saturday in NKC, MO with the rest of the Irish drunks , and the only Pi I'll be contemplating will be green.

    32. Re:Happy pi day everyone!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, good luck with that!

    33. Re:Happy pi day everyone!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh, a Blackadder reference. It's a shame Hugh Laurie has moved on to work on such utter shite.

    34. Re:Happy pi day everyone!! by dat+cwazy+wabbit · · Score: 1

      My dept. had pumpkin pie, apple pie, etc. at 1:59 in room 26. I am not making this up.

    35. Re:Happy pi day everyone!! by aqk · · Score: 1

      FU, insensitive clod!
      I still follow the Julian calendar.

      For now, I'll go with the steak & BJ !

      Alternatively, I would be interested in Moslem, Hebrew and Hindu calendars.
      Of course, for fundamentalist Christians it always was March 0, midnight.

    36. Re:Happy pi day everyone!! by HilbertsHotel · · Score: 1

      Don't you mean Shakes-PI-re?. If you can't read the NAME on the math tshirt, check out the Pi Day video.

    37. Re:Happy pi day everyone!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, that's real fair. Can you imagine the screams of bloody murder if any MAN dared suggest to his woman who wants to go out for Valentine's Day, she should "shut the hell up"?

      Let me explain a few things about the listed assumptions behind Steak and BJ day:

      1. Valentines Day is not for women. It's not for men. It's for greeting card and candy companies to exploit women's sentimentality, to fill their coffers.

      Men can certainly enjoy V-Day with their sweethearts. But we're not fooled - we don't object to sharing quality time, it benefits the relationship. We object to the idea that a special day needs to be set aside for it, but the ladies seem to have bought into it hook, line and sinker.

      Besides, women don't really care about "sharing the day together." To most women, V-Day = shiny things.

      2. Men know women like sex. We also know they don't particularly like giving BJs - sorry, but that's just the facts. Is it so much to ask for one lousy day when we can be *guaranteed* service without having to beg for it or reciprocate? Just let us enjoy one without guilt over gender equality.

      3. As if "Every day isn't already 'Steak and BJ Day'"

      Sister, get real. Steaks are rare (pardon the expression) and no-strings BJs are even rarer. Not to mention 365 days out of the year we're expected to fall over ourselves to make our women happy. If we don't want a lecture on how we don't appreciate her properly and she "could do better," we practically have to make every day V-Day.

      So, in short, shut the hell up!

    38. Re:Happy pi day everyone!! by pAnkRat · · Score: 1

      3 words: eta beta pie

      (Revenge of the nerds)

      Wow, and in this thread, it's on topic!

      --
      we need an "-1 Plain wrong" moderation option!
  2. Happy Pi day... by bugnuts · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... No cake for you!

    1. Re:Happy Pi day... by Brian+Gordon · · Score: 3, Funny

      The cake is a lie.

    2. Re:Happy Pi day... by ArcherB · · Score: 1

      The cake is a lie. Unless it has a pi symbol on it.. then it's a Pi Cake!

      (of course, such a cake should be round, unless you are just really REALLY into irony)
      --
      There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
    3. Re:Happy Pi day... by electricbern · · Score: 5, Funny

      Actually, the cake is a Pi.

      --
      alias possession='chmod 666 satan && ls /dev > il && tail daemon.log'
    4. Re:Happy Pi day... by PlatyPaul · · Score: 1

      I'd rather have French Silk pie....

      True story: two of my high school's math teachers used to make sure that we got French Silk pie on Pi Day and 2^10 Day (October 24th, of course), with a bit of extra math fun (games, etc.) unrelated to the topic at hand. Sure, it's a bit of a corny idea, but we appreciated that little "extra step" they took to make math more approachable, beyond their excellent guidance.

      If you're reading this: thank you, Mr. Petersen and Mr. Morse. You inspired me (and many of my friends) to go on to a career indulged in math (and chocolate!).

      --
      Misery loves company. Online misery loves unsuspecting random strangers.
    5. Re:Happy Pi day... by Neil+Hodges · · Score: 1

      I know I'll be enjoying some key lime meringue pie, and I'll make sure my family and friends enjoy theirs, too. I picked out my Pi shirt specifically for today.

    6. Re:Happy Pi day... by The+Redster! · · Score: 1

      Pi is ... ... ... ... 1.

      In base Pi, I'M FINE.

    7. Re:Happy Pi day... by hkmarks · · Score: 1

      The cake is (pi * r^2 * z) + frosting.

    8. Re:Happy Pi day... by Ragzouken · · Score: 1

      Don't you mean 10?

    9. Re:Happy Pi day... by bobdevine · · Score: 1
    10. Re:Happy Pi day... by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Actually, the cake is a Pi."

      Oh great, not another one of you fools tryin to tell me that pie are square....

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    11. Re:Happy Pi day... by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      The cake is a lie. The pie is a fake.
      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    12. Re:Happy Pi day... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In base Pi, I'M FINE.

      In base zero, you'd be a weirdo.

    13. Re:Happy Pi day... by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

      That would be 10.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
  3. Opportunity Missed.. by fictionpuss · · Score: 3, Funny

    To post this story at 1:59pm, or 12 hours earlier depending upon which clock you prefer.

    1. Re:Opportunity Missed.. by apdyck · · Score: 1

      Where I live, it was posted pretty darned close to 3:14 pm...

      --
      .sig
    2. Re:Opportunity Missed.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Time zones.

    3. Re:Opportunity Missed.. by Brian+Gordon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's already 3/14, that's why you celebrate it at 1:59.. 3/14 1:59

    4. Re:Opportunity Missed.. by apdyck · · Score: 1

      I certainly understand your reference, I was simply making the point that, in Atlantic time, it was very close to 3:14 pm on 3/14.

      --
      .sig
    5. Re:Opportunity Missed.. by davidwr · · Score: 2, Insightful

      3.1415926535897932384626433832795

      It takes excellent timing to do it at 03:14:59.26535897.....

      Even so, I can't wait until 02:06:53.58979 May 9, A.D. 3141. Or should that be March 14, 1592, oh wait, too late. Maybe we can do it at 03:14:15 in '92.

      --
      Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    6. Re:Opportunity Missed.. by DirkGently · · Score: 1

      Even so, I can't wait until 02:06:53.58979 May 9, A.D. 3141.

      Sorry. I think you're going to have to. Might also want to consider doing a Ted Williams with the 'ol grey matter, too. ;-)

      --

      I keep trying to pick fights, but I can't shake this Excellent karma.

  4. Wrong day by Ed+Avis · · Score: 4, Funny

    Surely 22/7 would be pi day.

    --
    -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    1. Re:Wrong day by Higaran · · Score: 1

      Yes but most of us write it as 7/22 so sorry, 3/14 is better

    2. Re:Wrong day by OrangeCowHide · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Most of the world (non-US) writes 22/7. They also write 14/3. So why is this international Pi day?

      --
      Creationists are a lot like zombies. Slow, but powerful and numerous. And they all want to eat our brains. - Evilest Doe
    3. Re:Wrong day by Alain+Williams · · Score: 1

      Most you you in the USA write it that way, most of the rest of the world writes day/month.

    4. Re:Wrong day by eln · · Score: 4, Funny

      Sorry, 22/7 is only approximately pi day.

    5. Re:Wrong day by Brian+Gordon · · Score: 2, Funny

      Nope, that's pi approximation day.

    6. Re:Wrong day by Neko-kun · · Score: 3, Informative

      That's why my files get dated YYYY/MM/DD so as to avoid any unnecessary confusion. Makes it easier to sort too:D

    7. Re:Wrong day by Ed+Avis · · Score: 3, Informative

      YYYY-MM-DD would be better; the different delimiter character avoids confusion with other date formats. This is the standard date and time notation.

      'course, if you're making subdirectories on a Unix filesystem, using / is handy.

      --
      -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    8. Re:Wrong day by The+End+Of+Days · · Score: 1

      And most of us here on Slashdot are in the US. So guess what the preferred format would be here, on Slashdot, where this story is being discussed.

    9. Re:Wrong day by EnglishSteve · · Score: 1

      And most of us here on Slashdot are in the US.

      And how do you know that? Geolocated all the IPs, have you?

    10. Re:Wrong day by Hillgiant · · Score: 5, Funny

      Everyday is approximately pi day. Just some approximations are better than others.

      --
      -
    11. Re:Wrong day by f97tosc · · Score: 1

      Sorry, 22/7 is only approximately pi day.
      22/7 is a better approximation than 3.14
    12. Re:Wrong day by hc5duke · · Score: 1

      That is incorrect. East Asia writes year-month-day, the proper ISO way.

    13. Re:Wrong day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, yes, but only the USA matters. Get capitalism and some nuclear weapons and then maybe we'll care how your barbaric "culture" attempts to keep time.

    14. Re:Wrong day by fbjon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Indeed, descending order of significance is the only order that makes sense. All other systems are local perversions.

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    15. Re:Wrong day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, they can have their pi day 2008, on February 3rd, 2009.

    16. Re:Wrong day by Chemisor · · Score: 1

      It's close enough for non-technical people.

    17. Re:Wrong day by jawtheshark · · Score: 1

      We all should, and I'm saying that as living in a DD-MM-YYYY country. However, I convinced my wife to put her photos in YYYYMMDD folders. A small victory.

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    18. Re:Wrong day by ET3D · · Score: 1

      I agree. Surely 22/7 is a much better approximation than 14.3, which is not even close to the value of Pi. I mean, even if they mean 14/3, that's still way off.

    19. Re:Wrong day by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      But then you'll be waiting hundreds of thousands of googols of googols of years to get to pi day.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    20. Re:Wrong day by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      40 digits of pi should be enough for anyone. That's all the digits you need to calculate the size of a spherical Universe with a radius measured in Planck lengths. Beyond that it's just mathematical masturbation.

      (I hope to hear that line uttered in an episode of The Big Bang Theory. Whatever license permits it, you have it.)

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    21. Re:Wrong day by PureCreditor · · Score: 1

      I usually just keep tracking of time based on seconds since Jan 1, 1970 =)

      so which day will Unix consider a pi day?

    22. Re:Wrong day by jawtheshark · · Score: 1

      Hmmmm.... That would be 3141592654 seconds, and a such 2069-07-21@00:37:34Z. ;-)

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    23. Re:Wrong day by bit01 · · Score: 1

      Indeed, descending order of significance is the only order that makes sense. All other systems are local perversions.

      It's also the ISO standard. Like metric, it just makes sense and I wish more people would use it.

      ---

      You're a fool if you think advertising pays for anything at all.

    24. Re:Wrong day by Neko-kun · · Score: 1

      Bah, sorry. I had momentarily forgotten that people round these parts know the difference between a /, ., -, and a ~.

      But yes, that's what I meant, Year Month Day

    25. Re:Wrong day by quenda · · Score: 1

      why? have you heard of the "world series" baseball?

    26. Re:Wrong day by giarcgood · · Score: 1

      Everyday is approximately pi day. Just some approximations are better than others.


      Yes, but I fail to see why people think 15032008 is an approximation to celebrate, and you can put the decimal point anywhere you like.
    27. Re:Wrong day by TimboJones · · Score: 1

      So we can celebrate Pi Day again in July. Why limit yourself to one day celebrating with pie? This is the best holiday ever, because when the world comes together to share their varied numeric and date formatting standards, we also share a some delicious pie!

      Thank you transcendental holiday!

      I'm trying to come up with ways to celebrate e...

    28. Re:Wrong day by Draykwing · · Score: 1

      Tell that to the little-endians!

    29. Re:Wrong day by G3ckoG33k · · Score: 1

      According to OpenOffice Calc:

      Pi()-3.14 ~ 0.00159265358979299

      and

      Pi()-22/7 ~ -0.00126448926734968

      So, 22/7 is a slightly better approximation.

    30. Re:Wrong day by HilbertsHotel · · Score: 1

      I look forward to Pi Approximation Day. It's Casual Pi day.

  5. when is e^ day? by OrochimaruVoldemort · · Score: 1

    it's the next most irrational number, and is almost as hard to figure out

    --
    If people can get past, can they get future? Best way to confuse a stoner
    1. Re:when is e^ day? by niteice · · Score: 1

      August 27? 27/8

      --
      ROMANES EUNT DOMUS
    2. Re:when is e^ day? by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      it's the next most irrational number, and is almost as hard to figure out

      I thought that was phi, the golden ratio.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
  6. Talk Like A Physicist Day by klossner · · Score: 4, Interesting
    In addition to being Pi Day, today is Einstein's Birthday and Talk Like A Physicist Day:

    Never say "I didn't sleep enough" - the correct way to say it is "It was observed that my sleep duration was less than average." Or (In Plank units), "I have a sleep deficiency of about ten to the power 47, which is about half an hour."
    1. Re:Talk Like A Physicist Day by SparkleMotion88 · · Score: 1
      The remainder of this comment contains a proof that today is not talk like a physicist day. We begin with the formal definition of the date of talk like a physicist day from the referenced article:

      When is the Talk Like A Physicist Day?
      March 14th. 2008+n, where n is an integer and n > 0.
      We need to prove that there does not exist n>0 such that March 14th 2008+n = March 14th 2008 (i.e. "today"). Proof by contradiction: assume there exists n>0 as described above and choose any such n. So March 14th 2008+n = March 14th 2008. Subtract March 14th 2008 from both sides of the equation and we are left with n=0. The conclusion that n=0 contradicts our earlier conclusion that n>0. So our assumption was false, and there does not exist n>0 such that March 14th 2008+n = March 14th 2008. That is, today is not talk like a physicist day.

      It is important to note that I am not talking like a physicist because, as shown above, today is not talk like a physicist day. I am talking like a mathematician because I am, in fact, a mathematician. The proof of this assertion is trivial and omitted for simplicity.
    2. Re:Talk Like A Physicist Day by Dun+Malg · · Score: 4, Funny

      (In Plank units) Aren't plank units Board-Feet?
      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    3. Re:Talk Like A Physicist Day by Fx.Dr · · Score: 1

      And following up TLAP Day is the oft overlooked Talk Like A Physicist to Girls Day, observed by spending the day blushing while staring at your toes, occasionally clearing your throat, and sputtering out the occasional "awe shucks".

    4. Re:Talk Like A Physicist Day by dreamchaser · · Score: 2, Funny

      The evidence at hand would seem to indicate that your verbage is non standard for a physicist. It fits the template of a pirate with insomnia, though. Without further data I am only speculating of course.

    5. Re:Talk Like A Physicist Day by Joe+Snipe · · Score: 3, Funny

      I believe you mean bohred-feet.

      --
      Sometimes, life itself is sarcasm...
    6. Re:Talk Like A Physicist Day by ultranova · · Score: 1

      Never say "I didn't sleep enough" - the correct way to say it is "It was observed that my sleep duration was less than average." Or (In Plank units), "I have a sleep deficiency of about ten to the power 47, which is about half an hour."

      Except that these are not equivalent statements. Your need for sleep could, after all, be less than average, in which case you could had very well slept enough despite having slept less than average. Or, if "average" refers to your own personal average sleep per night, rather than the population's at large, you could still normally sleep more than you really need to, or perhaps needed less than normal this particular day - perhaps you've been ill and needing more sleep, hiking your average up, and have now recovered, bringing your sleep requirements back down.

      The correct form would be something like: "It was observed that my state upon waking matched the criteria for being categorized as sleep deprived."

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    7. Re:Talk Like A Physicist Day by Michael+Woodhams · · Score: 1

      And in Japan it is White Day, where men are supposed to give return gifts for the chocolates the women gave them on Valentine's day.

      So today* is the day to give that special someone in your life a chocolate pi with 129 candles on it and singing a song something like this:

      Oh dear, where can the matter be?
      There's not enough for the gravity
      Maybe its all in dark energy
      The microwaves say it is there.

      (Lyrics original to this post.)

      * Yesterday for most of us :-(

      --
      Quattuor res in hoc mundo sanctae sunt: libri, liberi, libertas et liberalitas.
    8. Re:Talk Like A Physicist Day by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Women give men chocolates on valentines day in Japan? Wacky.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    9. Re:Talk Like A Physicist Day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you have that backwards. Women give chocolates to men on White Day, because Men were giving them the chocolates a month ago.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_Day

  7. Pi-th Post! by eldavojohn · · Score: 4, Funny

    Bask in its glory!

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:Pi-th Post! by kramulous · · Score: 1

      I'm freaking out, man! You like, post that, and like, you have 314 in your userID. And the other three digits also appear in Pi. Early too. Three layers of tin foil today.

      --
      .
    2. Re:Pi-th Post! by slimjim8094 · · Score: 1
      --
      I have developed a truly marvelous proof of this comment, which this signature is too narrow to contain.
  8. Unknown value? by ElizabethGreene · · Score: 5, Informative

    I would not say that it has an unknown value, the value is known as the ratio of a circle's diameter and circumference. Just because our system of representing numbers is flawed in that it cannot accurately define numeric sequences that approach infinity doesn't mean it is unknown... That is like saying 1/3 is unknown just because you can't print enough 3's after the decimal place to be accurate.

    Silly boys.

    -ellie

    1. Re:Unknown value? by VoltCurve · · Score: 1, Funny

      math? Imperfect? STONE HER

    2. Re:Unknown value? by fred+fleenblat · · Score: 4, Funny

      The value of pi can be precisely expressed as 1.0 (in base pi).

    3. Re:Unknown value? by timster · · Score: 1, Insightful

      But no system of representing numbers could express pi's relationship to 1 exactly without an infinite amount of information. We can express a method of calculating pi, for instance, but the method must necessarily have an infinite number of steps. That means the value cannot be found exactly, so in some sense it is very much "unknown".

      --
      I have seen the future, and it is inconvenient.
    4. Re:Unknown value? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      pi would be expressed as 10 (in base pi).

      1.0 (in base pi) is 1*pi^0 is 1.

    5. Re:Unknown value? by excelblue · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Don't you mean 10 (base pi)?

      1.0 (base pi) is still 1 (base anything).

    6. Re:Unknown value? by phliar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "infinite amount of information"? Only if you're the sort of person who calls any bigger-than-linear increase "exponential". Words have meanings, and scientific/mathematical words have very precise meanings.

      Here's a complete representation of the value of \pi:

      4\sigma_{k=1}^\infinity\frac{(-1)^{k+1}}{2k-1}

      That's only 368 bits of information, and I'm sure there are more compact encodings of the value.

      --
      Unlimited growth == Cancer.
    7. Re:Unknown value? by DougWebb · · Score: 1

      But no system of representing numbers could express pi's relationship to 1 exactly without an infinite amount of information.

      What is it about the symbol for pi that makes it more or less special than the symbol '3', or either of their relationships to the symbol '1'?

      There's a whole lot of math you can do using the symbol for pi to stand for the ratio between a circle's radius and circumference. The fact that it doesn't look like the symbols for decimal integers doesn't hurt it any; in fact, for most of higher math most of those symbols aren't even used that much.

      Also, if all you need to represent pi is two numbers and the division/ratio operator, that's hardly what I'd call an 'infinite amount of information'.

    8. Re:Unknown value? by helicologic · · Score: 1

      pi's relationship to 1 is (pi * 1), like 2's relationship to one is (2 * 1). It doesn't require "an infinite amount of information" to express pi, even in base 10. Have a look at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kolmogorov_complexity. Kolmogorov complexity deals with the amount of information required to express things: to express pi requires actually a very short program, i.e. not much information at all. Same with the number implied by this expression: 0.101001000100001... You can write a short program to express it with arbitrary precision, but it can't be exressed by a terminating decimal. Is its value "very much unknown"?

    9. Re:Unknown value? by popmaker · · Score: 1

      Well, there are unsolved mysteries surrounding the digits of pi. The patterns they follow aren't really known. It is still not known weather they are uniformly-distributed. So we don't know them all, and we don't really know how they behave.

      Compare that to the digits of 1/3 = 0.3333... They are pretty well known.

      Weather pi is "unknown" or not is kind of an undefined question. By definition it is not. By the cool formulas we know how to get better approximations of it, it is not. By the behavior and distribution of its digits it IS.

    10. Re:Unknown value? by timster · · Score: 1

      I'm taking exception to the original post, not trying to define a measure of complexity. I quote:

      That is like saying 1/3 is unknown just because you can't print enough 3's after the decimal place to be accurate.

      This seems to think that the problem with expressing pi's value involves the use of a decimal number system, when it's actually an inherent difficulty of expressing this value with integers.

      --
      I have seen the future, and it is inconvenient.
    11. Re:Unknown value? by debrain · · Score: 1

      Don't you mean 10 (base pi)? Would that be pi (base pi)?
    12. Re:Unknown value? by nine-times · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'm sorry because I know I'm being pedantic, but I've dealt a fair amount with number theory and I felt like I should comment. You can't, strictly speaking, have "base pi" in the way that our number system is "base 10". If you don't quite know why that is the case, ask yourself if you wanted to count to "10" in "base pi" (which would be pi), what would that counting look like?

      If you think it would be "1, 2, 3, 10" then you're talking about base 4. Otherwise, the distance on a number line between 0->1, 1->2, and 2->3 would all be equal to one unit, but 3->10 (the next number) would be 0.14159265... units.

      The issue of pi being an irrational number, rather, is related to the definition of numbers as geometric ratios (which is how most of our mathematics consider numbers). The problem is that the diameter of a circle and the circumference are incommensurable, meaning that you can never come up with a whole-number ratio between those two lengths. Therefore, you cannot, no matter what length you choose as your unit, measure both the diameter and circumference with the same unit.

      As a result, we generally take the diameter to be 1 unit of length, and the length of the circumference to be represented by the irrational number pi units of length. So the "number" of pi is an approximation of the ratio of diameter:circumference. We could just as easily assign the circumference to be the unit, however, and then the measurement usually represented by pi would be represented by "1" (which is what I think the GP post was alluding to). However, this would result in us having to deal with a different irrational number, which would be for representing the diameter, which would be 1/pi.

    13. Re:Unknown value? by timster · · Score: 1

      I see that you've provided a program with an infinite number of steps. That isn't exactly a value; more of a definition, wouldn't you say? The definition of pi as "ratio of circumference to diameter" also tells me how to obtain pi, but it certainly isn't the value of pi.

      This is very different from the example given in the original post of 1/3, which is only one step.

      --
      I have seen the future, and it is inconvenient.
    14. Re:Unknown value? by timster · · Score: 1

      Just a followup/clarification to my last post: my problem is that you're provided me with a program that cannot be executed -- a function that never returns. That doesn't let me know the exact value of pi; it lets me calculate it to some arbitrary precision.

      --
      I have seen the future, and it is inconvenient.
    15. Re:Unknown value? by Hillgiant · · Score: 1

      That's only 368 bits of information, and I'm sure there are more compact encodings of the value.

      Here's one: pi I tried to use &#960 ;, but /. did not like it.
      --
      -
    16. Re:Unknown value? by lilomar · · Score: 1

      I can do it with one:
      π
      At least I could without the lameness filter.

      --
      The creator of this post (Jacob Smith) hereby releases it, and all of his other posts, into the public domain.
    17. Re:Unknown value? by dpilot · · Score: 2, Funny

      Don't you just need an irrational number of fingers, or do the fingers themselves have to be irrational, as well?

      Many people are known to be irrational, so this shouldn't be impossible.

      --
      The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    18. Re:Unknown value? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      72 bits, non-recursive, with a single function call.

      \ln(-1)/i
    19. Re:Unknown value? by earlymon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think this representation will help - http://www.cryptonomicon.com/images/p15.gif

      BTW, forget the years of college math - I learned late in life that just about anything you'd need is in Cryptonomicon - http://www.cryptonomicon.com/text.html

      Watch out for June 2 on this evenly-numbered year - that'll be Dick Tracy day!

      --
      Pathological kinda promises Path + Logical - but instead, you get stuck with pathetic.
    20. Re:Unknown value? by UWM · · Score: 1

      We all know pi is exactly 3

    21. Re:Unknown value? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Way to kill the joke, dude!

    22. Re:Unknown value? by ISoldat53 · · Score: 1

      In an appropriately curved universe pi could be 3.

    23. Re:Unknown value? by lgw · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You can't do *discrete* math base pi, but there's plenty of other math you can do.

      You can do non-integer bases, but it gets interesting. Non-rational bases get even more interesting. Maybe not practical for much, and you can't represent the "normal" integers usefully, but it's still a field and all of the abstract algebra still works.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    24. Re:Unknown value? by lgw · · Score: 1

      the value is known as the ratio of a circle's diameter and circumference. That's quite underspecified. What sort of geometry did you have in mind? We don't know whether this statement is true in the physical world, but it seems likely that it's never true if you believe General Relativity.

      On the other hand, pi is used for so much more than that.

      e^(pi * i) + 1 = 0

      All the magic numbers are related in deep ways.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    25. Re:Unknown value? by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1
      The value of pi can be precisely expressed as 1.0 (in base pi).

      If so, then in base ten 1 equals ten, which makes no sense at all.

    26. Re:Unknown value? by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

      In an appropriately curved universe pi could be 3. Yeah, but the problem there is that you wind up with mail being delivered 6 months before it's given to the post office, and chunks of dead postmaster strewn about the room...
      --
      Bow-ties are cool.
    27. Re:Unknown value? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Otherwise, the distance on a number line between 0->1, 1->2, and 2->3 would all be equal to one unit, but 3->10 (the next number) would be 0.14159265... units.
      Changing the base does not change the number line, only how you *represent* its elements. There is actually no problem that the distance between "3" and "10" in the base you defined is not an integer.
    28. Re:Unknown value? by dfghjk · · Score: 1

      Correct. It's value is completely known, it simply can't be represented in a finite number of digits.

      Don't expect /. authors to appreciate the subtlety. They're just hacks.

    29. Re:Unknown value? by El_Oscuro · · Score: 1

      That reminds me too much of algebra. Ouch, my brain hurts!!!

      --
      "Be grateful for what you have. You may never know when you may lose it."
    30. Re:Unknown value? by nine-times · · Score: 1

      It may be interesting, but it sure rubs me the wrong way.. Does anyone actually do anything useful with non-integer bases? I've heard people raise the idea before, but it sounds pretty dumb to me. Sure, algebra could work that way, but that doesn't tell me anything. I could say I'm redefining "2" as "1.5" and "3" as "6", and then I could say that "2+2=6" and continue to do algebra like that, but I'm not sure I'm doing anything particularly valid there. And in base pi, is "12" an whole number...?

    31. Re:Unknown value? by maxume · · Score: 1

      1/pi, 2/pi, pi, pi+1/pi, pi+2/pi. It doesn't really make a whole lot of sense to use a system that can only express a single unit as pi/pi, but I'm pretty sure you could come up with a coherent system. (and if pi were often needed beyond 5 or 10 base 10 digits, somebody would probably work it out)

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    32. Re:Unknown value? by janeil · · Score: 1

      What it is about the symbol for pi that makes it special, and much more special than the symbol '3,' is that pi is transcendental and 3 is just an integer. There, question answered! And while much mathematical symbolic manipulation can be done simply using the symbol, very little math can be done without acknowledging the fact of pi's value, as in cos(pi) = -1. Here (as in most applications, this is of course trivial) pi can not be just a symbol.

      Much of the thread so far is pointless discussions which hinge on the definition of the 'value' of pi, or of how to 'express' pi. Yes, the value of pi is exactly the ratio of the diameter to the ratio of a circle. No, the numeric value of pi can not be explicitly expressed in any number system, not to mention that base pi is not meaningful.

      Pi is so cool as to be above these petty comments! e^(i*pi) = -1, believe it and be humbled!

      As for expressing pi, I like pi/4 = 1 - 1/3 + 1/5 - 1/7 ... There, again, question answered.

    33. Re:Unknown value? by lgw · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure that anything useful has ever been done in the entire field of abstract algebra. Certainly String Theorists have spent 30 years doing nothing useful. If base pi annoys you, make sure not to study hyperreal numbers, or surreal numbers, or especially not nimbers (which have the amusing property that n+n=0).

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    34. Re:Unknown value? by phliar · · Score: 1

      [A program] isn't exactly a value; more of a definition, wouldn't you say?

      No, I wouldn't. You're conflating an encoding with an algorithm.

      You're misusing the language. You do not seem to know the technical meanings of the words "encoding", "value", "definition", and (most crucially) "information."

      The pseudo-TeX I wrote is a representation of the value, not the definition. The definition is "the ratio of the of a circle's circumference to its diameter". The value of \pi expressed in base-10 is 3.141592653... . Another way to express the value of \pi 11.001001000011111101101010... . Yet another way (seen earlier in this thread) is ln(-1)/sqrt(-1). (And that last one's only 120 bits!)

      --
      Unlimited growth == Cancer.
    35. Re:Unknown value? by jonaskoelker · · Score: 1

      But no system of representing numbers could express pi's relationship to 1 exactly without an infinite amount of information. Have a look at Computable Numbers. Brief version: a number x is computable if there exists a Turing machine (basically a program, should a reader be unaware) that when given a rational epsilon > 0 computes a rational r, such that |x - r| < epsilon.

      From the WP article:

      The computable numbers include many of the specific real numbers which appear in practice, including all algebraic numbers, as well as e, pi, and many other transcendental numbers. If you start from ZFC you typically construct the real numbers as Cauchy sequences of rationals, each sequence representing its limit. So, let's pick the constant sequence of rational zeroes to represent the real zero. How do you represent this with a finite amount of information? Is it different then, to represent numbers by Turing machines? If so, how?

      You don't define what you mean by "exactly" or "relationship", so I can't speak to that very well. How do you express 7's "relationship" to 142857 "exactly"?
    36. Re:Unknown value? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think if the anonymous post comes from certain IP ranges it gets an extra penalty. It's pretty rare but mostly it just means someone nearby (in IP space) was troll or spammer and made cowboy neal mad.

    37. Re:Unknown value? by nine-times · · Score: 1

      Well part of what I'm saying is if you have a number system where all of you your integers be 1/pi, 2/pi, 3/pi, 4/pi, etc., then really 1/pi is just your unit and you have a normal number system of 1, 2, 3, 4, etc. So we say that the diameter of a circle is 1, and that makes the circumference approximately 3.14159265. But we could make the circumference 1 and then the diameter would be an irrational number that is approximately 0.318309886. That irrational number (0.318309886...) is just as magical as pi, and there's no absolute reason to say that 3.14159265... is more important than 0.318309886... It's largely an issue of tradition that we talk about circumference:diameter instead of diameter:circumference.

    38. Re:Unknown value? by maxume · · Score: 1

      Would they be integers? (I really have no idea)

      My point was more that if it was of reasonable practical value to count circumference-diameter ratios of things rather than units of things, there would probably be a coherent way of doing it laid out. Since it isn't useful(well, except in relation to counting things as units, hence pi), and counting things is useful, well, there we are.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    39. Re:Unknown value? by beaverbrother · · Score: 1

      AES encryption?

    40. Re:Unknown value? by sohare · · Score: 1

      I find your characterization of useful to be somewhat amusing, in the face of the broad applicability of a minor subset of algebra: linear algebra . The truth is that since the early 1900's, huge portions of mathematics have seen influence from algebra. There is algebraic geometry, algebraic topology, algebraic number theory, algebraic logic, topological algebra, Banach algebras, von Neumann algebras, Lie groups, normed rings, etc. This algebraization of modern mathematics has to due in large part to the fact that algebraic methods are really methods of "working and thinking", to quote the great algebraist Emmy Noether.

    41. Re:Unknown value? by Non-Huffable+Kitten · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure that anything useful has ever been done in the entire field of abstract algebra. Wow, that's a pretty bold claim to make.

      At the very least, parts of it (like groups) are used in many other branches of math.
      --
      Medium cat is MEDIUM.
    42. Re:Unknown value? by lgw · · Score: 1

      Hmmm, perhaps when it becomes useful we no longer call it "abstract" algebra, but you certianly make a good point about linear algebra. I found linear algebra very computational and concrete, but I guess technically it is a subset.

      Do people really consider number theory part of abstract algebra? I always thought of numeber theory informing algebra, not so much the other way around. Once you're simply working with "integers modulo n" it's hardly abstract.

      I'm finding it hard to come up with examples of the other algebras you mentioned being used in practical engineering. Certainly I know some math profs who would be shocked at the very suggestion (shocked, I tell you).

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    43. Re:Unknown value? by CuBr · · Score: 1

      It may be interesting, but it sure rubs me the wrong way.. Does anyone actually do anything useful with non-integer bases? Knuth [TAOCP 4.1] notes how in the quater-imaginary base you can multiply complex numbers using the "grade-school" algorithm (essentially). As well, in base 2i you can represent all complex numbers using only the digits {0,1,2,3}. (One curiosity of positive bases like 10 is that it is necessary to include a sign if you want to represent negative numbers.)

      And in base pi, is "12" an whole number...? No, it's pi+2.
    44. Re:Unknown value? by BooleanLobster · · Score: 1

      The series you link to comes immediately from the Taylor series of Arctan(x):
      (d/dx)Arctan(x) = 1/(1+x^2) = 1-x^2+x^4-x^6... (this series is valid/convergent only for |x^2|<1)
      Arctan(x) = x-x^3/3+x^5/5-x^7/7... (when |x|=1, it is a decreasing, alternating series, so it converges.)
      Pi/4 = Arctan(1) = 1-1/3+1/5-1/7...

      While that formula can be written very concisely, it converges slowly, requiring n terms to be summed to guarantee that the error is no more than 1/(2n+1).

      Here's a formula that converges more quickly. If memory serves, it was Ramanujan who derived it. If anybody here knows the math behind it, I'd like to see it.

      http://i29.photobucket.com/albums/c298/unconvinced1/pi.gif
      No autolink, had to encode as Extrans to get proper formatting.
      1/pi = sum, as k=0 to infinity, of Binomial[2k,k]^3 * (42k+5) * 16^(-3k-1)

      --
      In hell, you will find a mountain of broken, feces-covered typewriters and a stack of copies of the First Folio.
    45. Re:Unknown value? by aqk · · Score: 1

      >> The value of pi can be precisely expressed as 1.0 (in base pi).

      But in Kansas (or is it Arkansas?) it's even simpler:

      The value of pi can be precisely expressed as 3.0 (in base 10)


  9. March 14, 2015 by andrewd18 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    March 14, 2015 is going to be awesome. I think we should all coordinate our time off and have city-wide festivals (feastivals!) celebrating pi while eating ungodly amounts of it.

  10. ...and Pi!? by vettemph · · Score: 1


    Wow, It's Steak, bj AND Pi day? This couldn't get any better!

    For the un-initiated:
    Feb 14 is Valentines day.
    Mar 14 is Steak and bj day. (men need a holiday too, One that we actually want.)

    --
    The government which is strong enough to protect you from everything is strong enough to take everything from you.
    1. Re:...and Pi!? by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 1

      All I want is a big fat steak, a side order of fries, a case of beer, a bottle of scotch, a big fat joint, a backrub and a blowjob.

      Is that too much to ask?

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    2. Re:...and Pi!? by russotto · · Score: 1

      All I want is a big fat steak, a side order of fries, a case of beer, a bottle of scotch, a big fat joint, a backrub and a blowjob. Is that too much to ask?
      That's President's Day. Provided the president is Bill Clinton, anyway.
    3. Re:...and Pi!? by ImpShial · · Score: 1

      Is that too much to ask?

      Not today it's not!

      That's what is so great about Pi Day!

      Just don't eat the flag.

      --
      I gave up religion for Lent.
  11. What do you mean by unknown? by A+beautiful+mind · · Score: 4, Informative

    who's actual value will -- now and forever -- remain unknown
    Pi's value is known totally precisely, it is just that an irrational number cannot be represented using the good ol' rational numbers or any x/y form of them, it only can be approximated. That is why it is called an irrational number! It doesn't make pi any less definite though.
    --
    It takes a man to suffer ignorance and smile
    Be yourself no matter what they say
    1. Re:What do you mean by unknown? by show+me+altoids · · Score: 1

      Actually, it is not only irrational, but it is also transcendental

      --
      I feel sorry for people that don't drink, because when they get up in the morning, that's as good as they're gonna feel
    2. Re:What do you mean by unknown? by Xcott+Craver · · Score: 4, Informative

      Pi's value is known totally precisely
      Indeed, pi is exactly (ln -1)/(sqrt -1).
    3. Re:What do you mean by unknown? by mctk · · Score: 1

      It doesn't make pi any less definite though.

      I think it does in a sense. Pi is precisely defined: it's the number that you get when you divide the circumference of a circle by its diameter. But that's not its value, that's its definition. And then we say, "Oh and look at all the other places it pops up and all of the other things we can do with it." We can say, it's the number that does this. It's the one you get when you do that. But we can't precisely place it on a number line. There is something unknown about its value.

      But I will, of course, defer to you, Mr. Nash.

      --
      Paul Grosfield - the quicker picker upper.
    4. Re:What do you mean by unknown? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fail

    5. Re:What do you mean by unknown? by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      But we can't precisely place it on a number line. There is something unknown about its value.

      And by that logic, all non-abstract values are unknown. "How fact were you driving? It's unknown!"

      You want to talk about precision, fine. But frame it like that.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    6. Re:What do you mean by unknown? by moderatorrater · · Score: 1

      There's no way that's real.

    7. Re:What do you mean by unknown? by CalvinTheBold · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not exactly. I see what you are trying to do, though.

      The problem with trying to write ln(e^(pi*i)) = ln(-1) is that the natural logarithm function defined over the complex numbers has a branch cut along the negative x-axis. Anywhere along that line, ln is not a single-valued function. One may alternately say that ln is holomorphic for all complex numbers whose imaginary part is nonzero, or whose imaginary part is zero and real part is positive.

      This is why ln(x) is undefined for all x 0.

      --
      Try using a zero-knowledge proof to show you don't know anything!
    8. Re:What do you mean by unknown? by SEMW · · Score: 1

      You don't have to use the circle definition; it's possible to prove that the same pi is also, say, 4*Sum_iFrom0ToInfinity((-1)^i/(2i+1)). That gives you both its definition and its value, so what's the "something unknown"?

      --
      What's purple and commutes? An Abelian grape.
    9. Re:What do you mean by unknown? by SEMW · · Score: 1

      Indeed, pi is exactly (ln -1)/(sqrt -1). There's no way that's real. It's all a bit complex for me.
      --
      What's purple and commutes? An Abelian grape.
    10. Re:What do you mean by unknown? by kerrbear · · Score: 1

      > Indeed, pi is exactly (ln -1)/(sqrt -1).

      Spock said it best: "Computer, compute to the last digit the value of pi"

    11. Re:What do you mean by unknown? by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

      Except that e^(i*x)=cos(x) + i*sin(x) (Euler, I believe). Replacing the x's with pi's yields e^(i*pi)=cos(pi) + i*sin(pi). As cos(pi)=-1 and sin(pi)=0, we obtain e^(i*pi)=-1, or e^(i*pi)=-1. The problem with taking the natural log of both sides is that the natural exponential function is not one-to-one on the complexes (we also have that e^(3i*pi)=-1).
      If we restrict the natural exponential function to part of the complex plane, say where the complex part is greater than or equal to zero and less than 2*pi, then we take the natural log of each side of e^(i*pi) and get i*pi=ln(-1). Dividing each side by i yields pi=(ln(-1))/i.

    12. Re:What do you mean by unknown? by Dice · · Score: 1

      That's the standard branch cut, but you can define it to run from the origin to any point out at infinity. Some math text books use a branch cut along the negative imaginary axis.

    13. Re:What do you mean by unknown? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
    14. Re:What do you mean by unknown? by CalvinTheBold · · Score: 1

      This is true, but placing the branch cut along the x-axis works well with the real-valued definition of the natural logarithm as the area under the curve 1/t from 1 to x, where x > 0, i.e. since the natural logarithm is strictly undefined for negative real numbers.

      --
      Try using a zero-knowledge proof to show you don't know anything!
    15. Re:What do you mean by unknown? by mctk · · Score: 1

      I think that I chose the wrong bit to quote in my response. The OP said "Pi's value is known totally precisely" which is what I'm taking issue with. Sure, you can do all sorts of fun stuff to calculate pi. But does that give you its value? Sure, in a sense. Sometimes in a useful sense, but not in the way we traditionally use the word value.

      For example, what's the value of sqrt(9)?

      It's the number such that when you square it you get 9. Oh, it's also what you get when you take 81 to the 0.25 power. It's the number such that when you cube root it and then take it to the sixth power you get 9.

      Is the value of sqrt(9) known totally precisely in this example? Sure, in a way... but also not, in a way.

      Using the traditional usage of the word value, we cannot place pi on a number line. We do not know the 1.4 sextillionth digit. We do not know how to represent pi using our decimal system. This representation is (almost always) what we mean when we say value.

      --
      Paul Grosfield - the quicker picker upper.
    16. Re:What do you mean by unknown? by Twinbee · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing ln(-1) is unknown too...

      --
      Why OpalCalc is the best Windows calc
    17. Re:What do you mean by unknown? by Henry+V+.009 · · Score: 1

      No, the original poster was exactly right that pi = log(-1)/i. The analytic continuation of log(z) is "multivalued" in a lot more places than just the branch cut (in fact everywhere). Take any point, circle around the origin, and you've added 2*pi.

      The whole point of analytic continuation is to extend the domain of definition of your function. It's wrong to think of log(z) as a plain old multivalued function. Instead, what you're really doing is defining your function on a manifold (a space that is only locally R^n). In the case of log(z), it's an infinite corkscrew. Everywhere on that surface (a Riemann surface) log(z) is defined as Log(r) + i*theta, where z = r*e^(i*theta)

      The choice of branch cut is actually somewhat meaningless; what matters is the path that one takes to the point in question. Starting from the real number line, if you go around clockwise (increasing theta), you come to theta=pi and can evaluate it there. The answer is unique, log(-1) = pi*i, since (as you yourself said) log(z) is a holomorphic function.

      The only point that you can't do much with is log(0).

      For a discussion of log(z), see Churchill's Complex Variables. For a nice picture of the complex corkscrew that you get from log(z), see Penrose's "Road to Reality."

  12. My daughter's class is celebrating Pi day by georgeha · · Score: 1

    she had to bake a sweet potato pie Wednesday night. I hope there's some left.

  13. Obligatory Portal reference by imbaczek · · Score: 4, Funny

    The Pi is a lie.

    1. Re:Obligatory Portal reference by Cctoide · · Score: 1

      You're not being rational.

      --
      "Let's face it, it's a good story. Accuracy would kill it."
  14. Happy Pi Time by davidwr · · Score: 1

    Let's see, pi radians is 180 degrees, or halfway around the circle. On the clock that's at xx:xx:30, xx:30:00, 06:00:00 and 18:00:00 - or 12:00:00 if you have a 24-hour clock, and on the calendar it's mid-week, mid-month, mid-year, mid-decade, mid-century, mid-millennium, and mid-whatever cyclical unit of time you choose to measure.

    So, look at your watch and the next time it hits 30 seconds after the top of the minute, wish yourself Happy Pi Time.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  15. m/dd/yyyy indeed? by Animaether · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In the universally preferred notation (except for those who take being non-conformist to absurd levels), you'll mean the year 3141, May 9th at 2:53.58am in the morning.

    So we didn't miss it - but we will be missing it, as none of us are going to be living to be that old.

    Then again, this is all based on the current calendar (arbitrary) and how you interpret the numbers (arbitrary) as well as the date/time notation (arbitrary, as pointed out above) ( the last two being related to eachother as there's no, say, 31st of april.)

    1. Re:m/dd/yyyy indeed? by ElizabethGreene · · Score: 4, Funny

      None of us are going to be living? Speak for yourself. I just penciled it in the date on my calendar! (I'm signed up for Cryonics.)

      -ellie

    2. Re:m/dd/yyyy indeed? by Brian+Gordon · · Score: 1

      isn't it 3141 5/9 2:65:35am? Yeah 65 isn't a minute, but where did you get 53:58?

    3. Re:m/dd/yyyy indeed? by bishiraver · · Score: 2, Funny

      Have fun having your mind dumped into the body of a criminal in order to pilot a Bussard ramjet to seed far-off planets with terraforming modules!

      Just watch out for the kids when you get back to earth.

    4. Re:m/dd/yyyy indeed? by Moridineas · · Score: 1

      In the universally preferred notation (except for those who take being non-conformist to absurd levels), I find the fact that you care so much about how some people write dates (and seek to apply odd psychological profiles to them!) mildly disturbing.
    5. Re:m/dd/yyyy indeed? by calebt3 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I plan on living forever.
      So far so good.

    6. Re:m/dd/yyyy indeed? by wattrlz · · Score: 1

      Indeed, Is or will there be a 2:53:58 am in the evening? (oh, and it should be 2:6:53.58 in the morning)

    7. Re:m/dd/yyyy indeed? by jemenake · · Score: 1

      So we didn't miss it - but we will be missing it, as none of us are going to be living to be that old.
      Unfortunately, I doubt anybody reading this will live to see 2718-2-8 18:28:46, either. Hopefully, they'll thaw out Ted Williams' head then. So, "Happy e-day, Ted!".
    8. Re:m/dd/yyyy indeed? by djimi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You forgot to mention something even more arbitrary, the decimal system. 3.1415926535 really has no significance in the universe.
      Neither does 11.00100100001111110110 (binary) nor 3.243F6A8885A308D31319 (hexadecimal)
      The equation pi = c/d is what is true and real (and irrational - but I digress.)

      --
      Vox et praetera nihil
    9. Re:m/dd/yyyy indeed? by MemoryAid · · Score: 2, Funny
      You stopped short of claiming that pi, itself, was arbitrary. At least you are being rational.

      (I probably deserve a pi in the face for attempting that pun. (and this one))

      --
      Language students: Don't try to learn English here. This ain't it.
    10. Re:m/dd/yyyy indeed? by kryten_nl · · Score: 1

      ... 65 isn't a minute, ... On Earth.
      --
      For the perfect anti-Unix, write an OS that thinks it knows what you're doing better than you do and let it be wrong.
    11. Re:m/dd/yyyy indeed? by Brian+Gordon · · Score: 1

      What are you talking about, time is time, it's all completely arbitrary anyway.

    12. Re:m/dd/yyyy indeed? by Paradoks · · Score: 1

      Come now, without following American Pi Day, there'd be no ready-made yearly excuse to make Pi Pie.

    13. Re:m/dd/yyyy indeed? by adah · · Score: 1

      isn't it 3141 5/9 2:65:35am? Yeah 65 isn't a minute, but where did you get 53:58?

      Pi = 3.141592653589 ... Remove 6 and you get it. Were you stuck when you posted? :-)

    14. Re:m/dd/yyyy indeed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's an asshole, he can't help it.

  16. grammar day? by Speare · · Score: 3, Funny

    Pi Day is internationally celebrated in honor of the mathematical constant "Pi," who's actual value will -- now and forever -- remain unknown.

    When can we have grammar day? First, it is "whose," as possessive pronouns never use apostrophes. Second, it is not even "whose" because Pi isn't a person.

    --
    [ .sig file not found ]
    1. Re:grammar day? by TheLuggage2008 · · Score: 1

      If you are going to point out an error, at least take the time to provide an example of the correct grammar.

      Grammar has always been a weak-point of mine, so it would have been nice if you had finished your thought (assuming your actual goal was NOT just to point out someone else's mistake so you could look clever without actually being helpful).

      Don't make me go all George Costanza and have to tell you who the jerk store just ran out of...

    2. Re:grammar day? by rucs_hack · · Score: 3, Funny

      For using the term 'possessive pronouns' in a slashdot post, you win one internet. Please spend it wisely.

    3. Re:grammar day? by Urger · · Score: 1

      Second, it is not even "whose" because Pi isn't a person.

      Sush, you'll anger Pi speaking like that. Do YOU want to be the one who is responsible if gets angry and changes her value just to spite us?

    4. Re:grammar day? by gardyloo · · Score: 3, Funny

      If you are going to point out an error, at least take the time to provide an example of the correct grammar.

      Grammar has always been a weak-point (no hyphen needed) of mine, so it would have been nice if you had finished your thought (assuming your actual goal was NOT just to point out (split infinitive, but that's forgiveable these days)someone else's mistake so you could look clever without actually being helpful).

      Don't make me go all George Costanza and have to tell you who (whom: a tricky case this time) the jerk store just ran out of... (Even sentences which end in ellipsis dots need periods!) :)
    5. Re:grammar day? by TheLuggage2008 · · Score: 1

      Thanks, that's exactly what I meant. If I had mod points you would get +1 Informative :D

    6. Re:grammar day? by sbjornda · · Score: 1
      it is not even "whose" because Pi isn't a person

      I believe 'whose' is also the possessive pronoun of 'which' - unless you're aware of a 'whiches' or something similar? One is not compelled to use the circumlocution "of which". See, for example, http://www.bartleby.com/64/C001/049.html

      --
      .sig

    7. Re:grammar day? by courtarro · · Score: 1

      Second, it is not even "whose" because Pi isn't a person.

      That's one thing that sucks about English - in certain cases it is impossible for an object to possess something without being anthromorphized. I hereby define the word "whiches" to mean "the possessive form of which."

    8. Re:grammar day? by Joe+Snipe · · Score: 1

      I am having a comeback overload, so pick your favorite and mod me accordingly:

      1)
      Second, it is not even "whose" because Pi isn't a person.

      Don't tell this guy:
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pi_Rixiu
      2)
      I am reminded of the rule that that all grammar correcting comments will contain at least one error when I ask: should not Grammar Day be capitalized?
      3)
      All grammar nazis should be required to read this:
      http://instruct.westvalley.edu/lafave/DFW_present_tense.html
      lazier nazis can be distracted here:
      http://abcnews.go.com/Video/playerIndex?id=3737179

      --
      Sometimes, life itself is sarcasm...
    9. Re:grammar day? by Tejin · · Score: 1

      "That thar Pi number whats value will remain unknown, I say unknown 'til that ol' trumpet sound on judgment day."

      --
      The seekers do no need truth, the seekers do find truth and the finding do be painful
    10. Re:grammar day? by hansraj · · Score: 1

      You couldn't, since you already posted.

      Sorry, it's just not your day. Is it?

    11. Re:grammar day? by AaxelB · · Score: 1

      ...was NOT just to point out (split infinitive, but that's forgiveable these days) I generally make an effort not to correct grammar online, but here you're giving bad advice. The infinitive is "to point" and it's very securely unsplit. I'd expect many people to split the infinitive there (e.g. "...was NOT to just point out...") but he got it right.
  17. Counseling? by zazenation · · Score: 1

    Since we all seem to be concerned about Pi today, I wonder if it's getting therapy?

    It is an irrational number after all...

    1. Re:Counseling? by HilbertsHotel · · Score: 1

      Pi is irrational but claims to be well-rounded. A typical delusion.

  18. Pi Day? Sing it! by WebGangsta · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Lots of songs have been written about Pi Day (Google "Pi Day Songs" to find 'em).

    One of the more creative is this rap song (with video) to the tune of Eminem's LOSE YOURSELF.

    Best enjoyed with a slice of pie. Right, Agent Cooper?

  19. Redundant? by CSMatt · · Score: 1

    Today, the 14th of March, is Pi Day 2008. Pi Day is internationally celebrated in honor of the mathematical constant "Pi," who's actual value will -- now and forever -- remain unknown. Seems kind of unnecessary to explain what Pi is on a site like Slashdot.
  20. People with "pi" ... by antdude · · Score: 1

    ... love this day. Unfortunately, we don't get presents or anything like that. :(

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    1. Re:People with "pi" ... by Jearil · · Score: 1

      At my job I arranged with my coworkers for everyone to bring in pies. I made peanut butter, but one of my coworkers made an apple pie that had the pi symbol carved out on the crust for steam holes.

      Thinking about it though, I probably should have brought in half of a pie, because a whole pie is 2 pi which is overdoing things a bit.

  21. Magic Numbers?? by jimlintott · · Score: 1

    Magic numbers? WTF?

    Pi is simply the ratio of the circumference of a circle to it's diameter. Where's the magic?

    The square root of two is the square root of two. But I guess it's magic.

    Did this guy study math at a religious school or something?

    1. Re:Magic Numbers?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It's" is simply the contraction for "it is", not the possessive pronoun "its". Where's the grammar?

    2. Re:Magic Numbers?? by Deadstick · · Score: 1

      Well, e^(i * pi) = -1 comes a little closer to the magical, once you get past the grammar school definition...

      rj

    3. Re:Magic Numbers?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pi is not just the ratio of the circumference of a circle to its diameter. It turns up in all kinds of contexts which bear no apparent relation to circles, trigonometric functions, or the like (for example, the square of the integral of e^(-x^2) from negative infinity to positive infinity). The fact that it isn't just some funny number associated with a shape which happens to be important to us but a fundamental constant which all sorts of results in every field of math can be expressed in terms of gives it "magic".

  22. Happy PI day? by ForestGrump · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yea maybe you are happy, but I'm 3.14ssed!

    --
    Is it true that more people vote for the winner of American Idol, than vote for the president? -Ali G.
  23. Re:Pi Day? Sing it! by LanMan04 · · Score: 1

    I like my coffee black...black as midnight on a moonless night.

    This is some DAMN fine pie!
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    [Leeland]DANCE WITH ME! DANCE WITH ME![/Leeland]

    --
    With the first link, the chain is forged.
  24. What about pie day? by Dusty00 · · Score: 1

    When should we celebrate pie day? August 53rd at 9:73 ? Hmmmm, yea pie day isn't working out so well.

  25. not me by BitterAndDrunk · · Score: 1

    I'm packing my stabbing knife just in case I run into my buddy Jules.

    --
    You better watch out, there may be dogs about . . .
  26. to Quote Dr. Novella by geekoid · · Score: 1

    "ever is a long time."

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  27. March 2 in Indiana by cheezitmike · · Score: 0, Redundant

    In Indiana, they came close to celebrating Pi Day back on 3/2.

  28. mod parent up by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

    Poster deserves props for the mathematical correction on the day devoted to a mathematical constant.

    Good luck ever doing much in base-pi, though...

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
  29. freedom day by pak9rabid · · Score: 1

    I'm looking forward to freedom day. My biggest concern is to go with an Italian or lemon-based flag marinade.

  30. alternative representation in modular arithmetic by peter303 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This schema fails if you continue to minutes and seconds:
    March 14, 15:92:65

    The proper representation is modular-place arithmetic. Instead of assuming each number chunk is either decimal or hundreds, you use the actual size of the place. The Calendar places are:
    12 months
    31 days
    24 hours
    60 minutes
    60 seconds

    So 3.14159265 is
    3 months, remainder .14159265 months
    4 days, remainder .3893706 days
    9 hours, remainder .3448944 hours
    20 minutes, remainder .693664 minutes
    42 seconds, remainder .61984 seconds

    In other words March 4 9:20:43

  31. My company is celebrating Pi day by irenaeous · · Score: 3, Funny

    at least in the engineering department. We are having pie as a group at 1:59 this afternoon.

    BTW, today is also Albert Einstein's birthday.

  32. Not if you are un-American! by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1

    Sorry, but we missed Pi day by a longshot.

    Fortunately for those of us in the rest of the world where we use the more logical d/m/y time ordered notation we still have a couple of thousand years to go: 3/1/4159. It would have been earlier but April only has 30 days!

    1. Re:Not if you are un-American! by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Um.. it's much more logical to be year month day. Unless you use reverse decimal ordering. I.e. the number fourteen is represented as 41.

      In logical parts of the world, it goes Y.M.D. For a periodic event, it doesn't make sense to include the non-periodic year field, anyhow: hence M.D, which is exactly what we've got. Since there is no thirty-first month, there's no ambiguity there, either. Then take numbers to fill fields as they make sense.

      So, march 14 makes perfect sense. If you choose to start at 1:59, or 3:09 pm, or what have you, it's up to you, but I'm sure that the placeholder zero would be enough to make that less preferable. Now, the only real problem is that the digits never end, so you can keep filling arbitrary fields to your hearts content and assigning meaning to them. Like, you have to celebrate at house number 26 on your street, or going to a specific area code or something. It's not at all like mole day, where once you've gone through the nine or so digits that have been pinned down, you're done. You can't make up any more "more meaningful" ways to celebrate it.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    2. Re:Not if you are un-American! by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      Nah, the true logical order is a fully specified ISO 8601 compliant date, ordered as year, two-digit month, two-digit day, so the first pi day will be 31 415 926 535 897 932 384 626 433 832 795 028 841 971 693 993 751 058 209 749 445 923 078 164 062 862 089 986 280 348 253 421 170 679 821 480 865 132 823 066 470 938 446 095 505 822 317 253 594-08-12 (August 12).

      That's roughly 314,159 googol-googol A.D. Like a thousand-thousand being a million, except much bigger.

      But if you really want to get picky, you want the pi second: ten consecutive digits in pi matching the constraint of month, day, hours, minutes, and seconds in MMDDhhmmss format. That's July 26, 02:49:14. Treat the preceding 288 digits as the year and everything thereafter as an irrational fraction of seconds.

      I'll leave as an exercise to find out what day of the week those two dates are. But I seriously doubt our calendar will still be in use by then, let alone our Universe.

      Thanks go to The Pi-Search Page for the technical assistance (position 287 excluding the leading 3).

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    3. Re:Not if you are un-American! by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1

      Um.. it's much more logical to be year month day.

      Not if you are human and generally already know the year, probably the month and possibly the day. For example I could refer to a meeting on the 18th which currently would mean the 18th of March 2008, or if the meeting were actually next month I would say on 18th April the year being presumed to be 2008 or finally if I were planning something well in advance 18th April 2009.

      This is why we write dates in the order 14th March 2008 - you start with the finest grained information because that is what a human wants to know. I realize that a computer would like the year first so that it would put it in a string you can use an alphanumeric sort to get the correct order. However languages were developed for humans, not computers, which is why we use DMY.

      hence M.D, which is exactly what we've got.

      No you in the US have MDY which defies any logical explanation since it is not period ordered and more interestingly you seem to be the only country in the world which uses it so you didn't inherit it from anyone but somehow invented it all by yourselves.

    4. Re:Not if you are un-American! by Kangburra · · Score: 1

      I think it's explained if you say the date out loud. Most English speakers used to say "March the 3rd, 2008" and I am guessing this is how USians started to write their numeric dates. Why they persist with is beyond me though. ;-)

      --
      Common sense is not so common
    5. Re:Not if you are un-American! by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1

      Most English speakers used to say "March the 3rd, 2008" and I am guessing this is how USians started to write their numeric dates.

      Interesting. Actually I would say "the third of March" and, at least at some point in the past the USians used to say it this way too since they are forever going on about "the fourth of July". So I wonder if that manner of saying the date really was the cause of the MDY order or whether it is a result of it.

    6. Re:Not if you are un-American! by AdamHaun · · Score: 1

      Both ways are commonly used in the US, but putting the month first ("March fifteenth") is more common. Putting the day first ("the fifteenth of March") sounds more formal and literary to my ear, though the real formal way to write the date is "March 15, 2008". Leaving off the articles ("fifteen March") is just as comprehensible but sounds stilted, like I'm reading off of a form.

      Despite the variance in spoken language, the numerical abbreviations (3-15-2008, 3/15/2008, 3/15, etc.) are always understood to be month-first.

      This system makes sense to me for the same reason that putting the hour before the minute when I tell time does -- the coarser information is often more important and tells me up front whether I'm dealing with something in the immediate future or something longer term. I don't think it ends up being noticeably better in the long run, but I don't think it's senseless, either.

      --
      Visit the
    7. Re:Not if you are un-American! by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      We really should put the year first though, since it turns a date into just another number, but with weird base rules.

      Of course, institutional inertia, and the fact that most of the time, you don't need the year at all, since you're usually talking about events that are within +/- 3 months from now(), means that we're not going to switch any time soon.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    8. Re:Not if you are un-American! by Fafnir_b · · Score: 1

      If I had any mod points, I'd give them all to you.

  33. These magic numbers can't be explained, by iminplaya · · Score: 1

    they just are.

    God is pi... pi is God?

    --
    What?
  34. pi's value today by Lucas123 · · Score: 3, Funny

    My favorite part about this pi calculator are the two words at the end.

  35. Is it pi day in Europe? by kpsimm · · Score: 1

    It is 14.3 in Europe today. 3.14 wouldn't be a valid date.

    1. Re:Is it pi day in Europe? by HilbertsHotel · · Score: 1

      It's Pi Day all over the world. Don't obscure reality with details.

  36. International? by genka · · Score: 2, Funny

    3/14 sound more like American Pi day. In most other places it is 31/4.
    Oh, wait they don't get to celebrate at all!

    1. Re:International? by Sigma+7 · · Score: 1

      In most other places it is 31/4. Only if you are using dd/mm/yy.

      The correct international date format uses the ISO format of yyyy-mm-dd - for pi day, it's 31415926535897932384626433832795028841971693993751058209749445923078164-06-28. Unlike the annual celebration, this one day event is something that you won't forget.
    2. Re:International? by DanielG42 · · Score: 1

      They're stuck with 22/7

      --
      Daniel
    3. Re:International? by bckrispi · · Score: 2, Funny

      3/14 sound more like American Pi day.
      This one time, at Math camp...
      --
      Xenon, where's my money? -Borno
  37. How did I not remember this? by pi_rules · · Score: 1

    I should celebrate this.

    1. Re:How did I not remember this? by LMacG · · Score: 1

      As a form of celebration, I suggest walking around in a circle.

      --
      Slightly disreputable, albeit gregarious
  38. Pi approximation day by popmaker · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm saving the pie for "pi approximation day" which is the 22. of july (22/7 = 3.1428571428).

    Like this guy:
    http://www.qwantz.com/archive/000955.html

    1. Re:Pi approximation day by aniefer · · Score: 1

      Hah! I love it. If I remember, I will celebrate pie approximation day. Though maybe I'll eat a tart instead of almost eating a pie.

  39. Not Trolling Here But... by Griff-GW · · Score: 0

    Not a Holiday Google didn't change there image on there site. Google is the authority on Holidays and almost anything. :-)

  40. Do I lose all geek cred if I admit I think celebrating a mathematical constant is silly?

    1. Re:Wi? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do I lose all geek cred if I admit I think celebrating a mathematical constant is silly?

      I'm pretty sure you have to have the cred to lose it. So, no.

    2. Re:Wi? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      No, just nerd points. PI day gets PI discussed more;which means more opportunity to explain it. I'm going to use it to teach my kids about PI. Of course I won't present it that way. I like my teaching to sneak up on them and slip into there brain. Then I can point and go "HA HA, you learned something, suxxor!"

      I can't wait for the hordes of non-parents to think that last part is serious and give me their parenting 'advice'.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:Wi? by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

      Wow. That was really pointless. Someone punch you in the balls today or something?

  41. 355/113 by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 1

    I know the real value of Pi, but I'm not telling. By the way, I also know where the ark of the covenant is hidden; no it's not in a federal warehouse like Indiana Jones would have you believe. I have it hidden in the same place where I keep this piece of paper with the actual value of Pi. But you'll never find it.

  42. These are the real pi moments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    For those of us on 64 bit surely:

    date -d @3141592653
    Sat Jul 20 20:37:33 EDT 2069
    is the next pi moment.

    You 32bit suckers have already passed the last one:

    date -d @314159265
    Sat Dec 15 21:27:45 EST 1979

    And a long wait for the next pi moment after that:

    date -d @31415926535
    Sat Jul 13 02:15:35 EDT 2965
    1. Re:These are the real pi moments by Tycho · · Score: 1

      What about the "pi" IPv4 and IPv6 addresses? I'm not sure if this is possible any more, but telnet, at one point at least, would accept base-10 numbers without the "." between each number for an IP address. However there is a procedure for this. To intentionally connect to a known host this way, convert the base-10 sections individually to hex, remove the "." characters, and convert the resulting 32-bit hex number to base-10 and use the resultant number as the IP address. Where numbers like "pi" or "e" go is a good question that I am not going to attempt to find out. I guess there is also the hex floating point representations that would be something to see also.

      --
      Impersonating Tycho from Penny Arcade since before there was a PA.
  43. Re:alternative representation in modular arithmeti by Dachannien · · Score: 1

    Personally, I'm not very picky. I celebrate for the entire month of March, and I do my engineering calculations accordingly.

  44. PI poem by thedrx · · Score: 1

    I wrote a PI poem for my girlfriend today :)

    PI day is a great way to give your girlfriend/fiancee/wife flowers or other stuff. Fuck Valentine's day!

    1. Re:PI poem by popmaker · · Score: 1

      Is that it? Hope she liked it.

  45. Spammed! by Teflon_Jeff · · Score: 1

    I already spammed my office with Pi to 16,384 digits.

    And I've also already received question about why I sent it at 1:59:26 PM.

    Oh, to be surrounded by smarter co-workers.

    --
    "Teach a man to build a fire, and he's warm for a day. Set a man on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life."
  46. St. Patrick's Day too by hc5duke · · Score: 1

    Today is also St. Patrick's Day... according to some. Also tomorrow (3/15), also Monday if you don't observe Lent. Fuck it, every day should be St. Patrick's Day.

  47. Funnily enough by mpiktas · · Score: 1

    Pie is pronounciation only used in English. Everybody else is saying pee, or pe:) Pee probably is not cool enough in English :)

    1. Re:Funnily enough by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      Pee probably is not cool enough in English :) Well, "pee" is slang for urine in English, so you're probably right.

      That and the fact we don't normally pronounce "i" as "ee" too, of course(!)
      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    2. Re:Funnily enough by whitehatlurker · · Score: 1
      We already have a letter we call "pee" ... this one: P

      I steadfastly call the Greek letter transcripted as "phi" as "fie" to spite those who try to be more proper and say "fee."

      --
      .. paranoid crackpot leftover from the days of Amiga.
  48. Too bad it's not 15 A.D. by afabbro · · Score: 1

    ...and 9:26:53am.

    --
    Advice: on VPS providers
  49. timing by lazy-ninja · · Score: 1

    This post was made 9 minutes late I feel.

  50. I went to school with nerds. by JoshOOOWAH · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Cosine Secant Tangent Sine! Three Point One Four One Five Nine!

    1. Re:I went to school with nerds. by Deadstick · · Score: 1
      Differential...X!

      Differential...Y!

      A square! B square!

      Integral of pi!

      --Georgia Tech version

      rj

  51. For my wife by danger42 · · Score: 1

    I sent my wife 3.14 flowers. Maybe now she'll get off my back.

    --
    -nd
  52. 42 by Nathrael · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Hm, just by the way, already noticed that Pi multiplied with 13,37 is approximately 42? Mathematics definitely play an important role for solving the answer to life, the universe, and everything...

    --
    A good education is a bit like a STD - it makes you unsuitable for a lot of jobs and gives you a desire to spread it.
    1. Re:42 by glencairn · · Score: 1

      PI is the basis for solving the answer to life, the universe, and everything, i.e. solve the sum 3.14 (a dot is normally taken as the multiplication sign when writing formulae of matrices & vectors) and you get 42 (clever guy Douglas Adams). So there you have it, solve the mystery of the choice of 42, with another universal scientific conundrum - totally apt.

  53. Good book about Pi by -noefordeg- · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Not sure if anyone has mention this book (link : http://www.amazon.co.uk/History-Pi-Petr-Beckmann/dp/0312381859/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1205526089&sr=8-1 )
    I found it entertaining and easy to read while at the same being informative/interesting. I feel the book gives a very good presentation of the thought process behind how different civilizations reached their approximation of Pi and a good insight into how brilliant people of different times where able to calculate Pi. I bet a lot of "ordinary" people wouldn't have a clue about how to find a good number for Pi, without hitting their "Pi"-button on a calculator :)

    A good read. Very nice addition to say, your toilet library (I've got one...)

    1. Re:Good book about Pi by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      I second this. I read quite a lot of popular-science books, and the subject of pi didn't seem too fresh, but it turned out a nice and quirky read on the history of math overall. The author shows his geek/hacker personality quite a lot, whereas most writers of this genre seem to pretty much hide it.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  54. Remain unknown? What the fsck? by Deadstick · · Score: 4, Funny
    Pi is exactly equal to the sum of the infinite series 4 - 4/3 + 4/5 - 4/7 + 4/9 - 4/11...

    rj

    1. Re:Remain unknown? What the fsck? by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1
      Bonus: Pi in Pi: the first 50 digits of Pi, after the decimal point, found in Pi: 14159265358979323846264338327950288419716939937510 occurs at position 200,000,001. An amazingly near-round position.


      Oh, that's cool! I'd not heard that one before.

      I'd like to know where the code for my great un-written novel is in Pi so that I don't have to type it out.


      -FL

  55. Happy Birthday to me! by reidconti · · Score: 1

    It's my birthday too! 27. Anyone else out there with today as their birthday? There's gotta be more of you, I have 2 coworkers and a few friends with the same birthday.

  56. Pi Joke by lenmaster · · Score: 5, Funny

    What is the volume of a pizza of radius z and thickness a?

    Answer: pi*z*z*a

  57. Hard 'n Phirm by Kal+Zekdor · · Score: 2, Interesting
    http://youtube.com/watch?v=mDu351QNoZE

    Your ever-constant homily says flaw is discipline.
    The patron saint of imperfection frees us from our sin.
    And if our transcendental lift shall find a final floor,
    Then Man will know the death of God where wonder was before.
    Enjoy Pi day as it should be enjoyed.
  58. What about Woodrow Wilson Smith? by SacredByte · · Score: 1

    ... Or Bill "Woodie" Smith, or Ernest Gibbons, or "Happy" Daze, or Dr. Lafayette (Lafe) Hubert, or Mr. Justice Lenox, or Aaron Sheffield, or Ted Bronson, or Lazarus Long....

  59. Screw Pi Day! by Sepiraph · · Score: 1

    What happened to e and i day? You insensitive clod!

  60. Re:Pi Day? Sing it! by SteveWoz · · Score: 1
    --
    OK a new size TV
  61. It's Really June 28 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since pi should really be what we know as 2pi, Pi Day should not be until June.

  62. I beg to differ... by qmaqdk · · Score: 1

    "who's actual value will -- now and forever -- remain unknown."

    Actually Pi's value is known exactly as various series expansions. This is exactly the way you "know" a real number; by stating it's series. 2 for instance has the series 2,2,2,...

    --
    My UID is prime. Hah!
  63. Obligatory Klingon reference by Ankle · · Score: 1

    Today is a good day to Pi!

  64. No, it Bucksday, Buckuary, Buckyith by tobiah · · Score: 1

    http://www.unitedmedia.com/comics/getfuzzy/archive/getfuzzy-20080310.html

    In a Buckycentric universe "I didn't sleep enough" is just implied, there is no translation. However, one can still take a 10 buckute nap...

    --
    "The ability to delude yourself may be an important survival tool" - Jane Wagner -
  65. Aka "Boss Appreciation Day" by tobiah · · Score: 1

    A time to gather with your coworkers and give them something they'll remember for the rest of their lives >:>

    --
    "The ability to delude yourself may be an important survival tool" - Jane Wagner -
  66. Maybe not by geekoid · · Score: 1

    http://www.ted.com/index.php/talks/view/id/39

    the current calendar isn't arbitrary, it is based on observations in nature. Time isn't arbitrary either, it is also based on nature. If it was just arbitrary you couldn't use it for anything else.

    arbitrary: capricious; unreasonable; unsupported

    It is none of those things.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:Maybe not by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      the current calendar isn't arbitrary, it is based on observations in nature. Time isn't arbitrary either, it is also based on nature. If it was just arbitrary you couldn't use it for anything else.

      arbitrary: capricious; unreasonable; unsupported

      It is none of those things.

      Maybe "extremely parochial" would be a better description, with a side-dish spelling out that such parochialism will become more apparent as human environments become more dissociated from the natural environment.
      Example : I generally work 24-hour cover in steel boxes without windows, and only venture into the outside when necessary (which is as likely to be at 03:00 local time as at 15:00). Already, of those of us who work 24-hour cover (as opposed to those who work 12-hour back-to-back shifts with an opposite number) often notice that we drift to a circa 26-hour day when we're running on body clocks only. Over a 2 to 3 week normal working hitch, that can shift you over a day out of phase with the rest of the world.
      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  67. correction by geekoid · · Score: 2, Informative

    "pi is an approximation of the ratio of diameter:circumference"

    PI is exactly the ratio of diameter:circumference, we can only express it as an approximation in our number system.

    PI = (ln -1)/(sqrt-1)

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  68. sure it's arbitrary by Animaether · · Score: 1

    (incorrect numbers notwithstanding - thought I just copied them from my parent poster)

    It's arbitrary insofar as that the year, month and day we live in right now is arbitrary. It's based on the Gregorian calendar. What if we went by the Julian calendar? Or the Hebrew calendar? Chinese calendar? etc.

    1. Re:sure it's arbitrary by jonaskoelker · · Score: 1

      It's arbitrary insofar as [...] True, we could use a different calendar. You do get that what your parent tries to point out is that the duration of the time intervals in our current time-and-calendar system aren't arbitrary, but derived from natural phenomena, right?
    2. Re:sure it's arbitrary by iowannaski · · Score: 1

      You do get that what your parent tries to point out is that the duration of the time intervals in our current time-and-calendar system aren't arbitrary, but derived from natural phenomena, right?

      Yeah, arbitrarily chosen natural phenomena. Thus, arbitrary.

      --
      i forget
    3. Re:sure it's arbitrary by jonaskoelker · · Score: 1

      Yeah, arbitrarily chosen natural phenomena. I don't know about you, but my sleeping patterns seem to relate closely to the earth's rotation around itself. Also, the rotation of the earth around the sun tends to influence my eating habits (what's in season?) and clothing habits (coat or no coat).

      If indeed they're arbitrarily chosen, what are some other natural phenomena suitable for calendaring that affect my life?
  69. Re:alternative representation in modular arithmeti by jabberw0k · · Score: 1

    Why couldn't it be

    3/14 1:59:26.535...

  70. Missed it on February 27 by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    Actually, since the calendar has about 365.25 days, and there's 2*pi days around its circumference, 365.25/(2*pi) = 58.1313430307395, the 58th day is "Pi Day".

    Happy February 27, everyone!

    I know, that's irrational.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  71. Phi is more irrational than either pi or e. by SEMW · · Score: 1

    it's the next most irrational number Actually, phi ((1+sqrt(5))/2) is more irrational than either exp(1) or pi, in the sense of being the hardest to get accurate rational approximations for. To be precise: Hurwitz' Theorem states that every number has infinitely many rational approximations p/q with error less than 1/(sqrt(5)q^2); if you work out the rational approximations to phi (easy enough; they're the ratios of consecutive Fibonacci numbers) they're as bad as you can get under the theorem. So the golden mean can never have a rational approximation as good as 22/7 was for pi, or even as good as 7/5 was for sqrt(2).
    --
    What's purple and commutes? An Abelian grape.
    1. Re:Phi is more irrational than either pi or e. by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

      But phi is algebraic (a root to x^2-x-1), whereas pi and e are both transcendental, i. e. neither is a root of a polynomial with integer coefficients.

  72. In honor of Pi Day by LarryIsMe · · Score: 1

    In honor of Pi Day, I offer a story and a proof. This is a true story.

    My mother (now retired) used to be an elementary school teacher in the LA area. One day, she was comparing the circumference of a
    circle with the diameter and she noticed that no matter how big the circle, this ratio seemed to be constant.

    She was very excited and she mentioned it to the other teachers. One teacher told her that it couldn't be true. If it were true,
    it would be well known. The principal got involved and asked my mother not to tell the kids this since it is not an
    official part of the lesson.

    When she told me, I shook my head and explained to her that pi, by definition, is the ratio of the circumference to the diameter.
    That she was right. It is always the same for all circles which is why pi is such an important constant. It was pretty
    scary that no one in her entire elementary school understood this including the principle.

    Now, for all those who doubt that such a constant exists, here's a proof (see Corollary 1):

    Proof that pi exists

    Happy Pi Day!

    -Larry

  73. Re:Pi Day? Sing it! by kramulous · · Score: 1

    I'm guessing those songs go on forever?

    --
    .
  74. =0.540302... by SEMW · · Score: 1

    Cosine Secant Tangent Sine! Three Point One Four One Five Nine! =0.540302...

    (Essentially cos(1), since sin(pi) = 0, tan(0) = 0, 1/cos(0) = 1)
    --
    What's purple and commutes? An Abelian grape.
  75. 'i' day by SEMW · · Score: 1

    What happened to ... i day?

    I think I imagined it.
    --
    What's purple and commutes? An Abelian grape.
  76. Pi as a hex formula by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

    From http://everything2.com/index.pl?node_id=1122646 :

    The following algorithm is a major advance in Math Research and was discovered by David H. Bailey, Chief Technologist, NERSC at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.

    The algorithm for computing individual hex digits of pi is based on this formula:

    pi = sigma(for k = 0 to infinity) { 1/16^k * [ (4/(8k+1) - 2/(8k+4) - 1/(8k+5) - 1/(8k+6) ] }

  77. Re:What about e day? by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

    I'd give parent a +1 funny, but I already had posted something.

  78. How I wish I could remember pi by nogginthenog · · Score: 1

    What is it again?

  79. Download pi, Slashdot my server by m85476585 · · Score: 1

    I put a billion digits of pi on my server available to download: http://micronetsoftware.com/pi_day/ The reason I'm intentionally trying to Slashdot my server is that my web hosting company (Inmotionhosting) gives me 15TB of data transfer per month on my shared hosting plan for only $8/month. Obviously it is almost impossible for an average site to use that much since most big sites are CPU intensive, and they apparently have a secret CPU quota. I want to prove to them that overselling is a bad idea, and I want to use all of what I paid for. I also have 1.5TB of disk space, so I extracted a small (4gb) zip bomb the other day. They didn't seem to notice. Eventually I'm going to use the extra space to backup my computers, instead of buying an online backup service.

  80. idiot submitter got every point wrong by sribe · · Score: 1

    I hate it when innumerates write about math. As others have already pointed out effectively, the precise value of pi is known. I just want to add that the value of pi most certainly can be explained, and is in no way whatsoever a testament to technology or computers.

  81. In a base 10 number system... by okmijnuhb · · Score: 1

    In a base 10 number system, pi is not a whole number...but maybe in some other base number system, pi would become a whole number, and therefore known and exactly quantifiable?

    1. Re:In a base 10 number system... by Schmicky · · Score: 1

      on a Pi based number system... Pi=1bPi.

  82. this is a holiday? by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    what an irrational holiday

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  83. Pi on Shirt by pipingguy · · Score: 1

    I often wear my ThinkGeek Pi T-shirt to work and chicks dig it. I get laid by supermodels all the time because of it.

    OK, not really, but sometimes people ask about it, think it's cool and ask where can they get one.

    OK, OK, in reality, the stains from thrown, half-empty beer cans from passing cars do wash out fairly well (I walk to work).

  84. I vote for 6.28318531... by TheLink · · Score: 1

    The current pi _is_ a bit arbitrary.

    In my opinion using the ratio of circumference to diameter is stupid. I've found that strange since the first I learnt of pi.

    Doing the ratio of circumference to radius would have made more sense - the radius and circumference are more related to the same centre point of a circle.

    If you see lots of 2 * pi in formulas that's more evidence people got it wrong.

    6.28318531... would have been a better number than the existing 3.141....

    --
  85. so... by zxnos · · Score: 1

    ...if pi is an irrational, trancendent, never ending and non-repeating decimal, does that mean that the circumference and area of a circle are infinite?

    --
    always mosh clockwise
  86. The Pi Song by Bifurcati · · Score: 1

    This has achieved mild notoriety: The Pi Song

  87. Pi Family by auburnate · · Score: 1

    My sister's birthday is Pi Day. I was always jealous of that. Her initials now that she is married are A.E. just like Albert Einstein. My birthday is 7/22 and my oldest brother's is the degenerate Jan 3 which is another approximation for Pi. 3/1 22/7

    1. Re:Pi Family by Ashtead · · Score: 1

      Then you're actually the closest to the value of pi:

      July 22, 22/7 = 3.142857; 3.142857-3.141593 = 0.001264; 0.1264 percent high

      March 14, 3.14 = 3.140000; 3.140000-3.141593 = -0.001593; 0.1593 percent low

      Jan 3, 3/1 = 3.000000; 3.000000-3.141593 = -0.141593; 14.1593 percent low

      Congratulations!

      --
      SIGBUS @ NO-07.308
  88. Happy Pi Day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now eta bitta Pi :)

  89. obligatory by ConcreteJungle · · Score: 1

    all of your bases are ours

  90. I thought this was a different day... by slashname3 · · Score: 1

    I thought pie day was the day when Bill Gates was hit in the face by a pie.

    February 4th, 1998 is when it happened. See the action here:

    http://www.bitstorm.org/gates/

    For a few years I took pies into work on that day. Everyone really liked them.

  91. The Great Immortal Syracusan! by aqk · · Score: 1

    Now I even I
    Would celebrate in rhymes unapt
    The great immortal Syracusan
    Rivaled nevermore
    Who in his wondrous lore
    Passed on before
    Gave men his guidance
    How to circles mensurate


    etc etc....
    As an aid to insomnia, I once had PI memorized to 60 places.
    Then Paxil came along. With trusty alcohol, a wonderful combo!
    Thank goodness for the above poem which I still remember from childhood.
    (but I never really need to use more than 12 words of it)


  92. Pi by probability by Schmicky · · Score: 1

    Ever thought that by just throwing needles, you could figure out Pi? Check out this Pi by probability site. http://mathworld.wolfram.com/BuffonsNeedleProblem.html