Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Seeks Patent On Shaming Fat Gamers

theodp writes "A newly disclosed Microsoft patent application — Avatar Individualized by Physical Characteristic — takes aim at fat people, proposing to generate fat avatars in gaming environments for individuals whose health records indicate they're overweight, limiting their game play, and even banning them. From the patent application: 'An undesirable body weight could be reflected in an overweight or underweight appearance for the avatar. Only requisite health levels are allowed to compete in a certain competition level. A dedicated gamer could exercise for a period of time until his health indicator gadget shows a sufficiently high health/health credit in order to allow reentering the avatar environment.' Linking one's gaming avatar to one's physique, explains Microsoft, will produce healthy and virtuous behaviors in individuals. Microsoft also proposes shaping gaming experiences by using 'psychological and demographic information such as education level, geographic location, age, sex, intelligence quotient, socioeconomic class, occupation, marital/relationship status, religious belief, political affiliation, etc.'"

553 comments

  1. Digital medical records by TheMeuge · · Score: 5, Funny

    So THAT's why we're going to have digital medical records...

    1. Re:Digital medical records by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I thought one idea of games was to escape various aspects of the real world, by pretending to be somebody we aren't (like a would-be ruler of the world)?. Why do we want to be dragged as ourselves into the game enviornment????

    2. Re:Digital medical records by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      funny you should mention that. When I read the summary my main response was something along the lines of it being impossible to implement even if the stupid patent was approved simply because:

      NO GOD DAMNED GAME COMPANY SHOULD BE ABLE TO ACCESS YOUR FUCKING MEDICAL RECORDS TO FUCK WITH YOUR GAMING TO BEGIN WITH. (For ANY reason really.)

    3. Re:Digital medical records by binarylarry · · Score: 5, Funny

      Why do you say that, fatty?

      --
      Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
    4. Re:Digital medical records by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm just going to leave this here...

      http://www.healthvault.com/

      This is by Microsoft.

    5. Re:Digital medical records by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought one idea of games was to escape various aspects of the real world, by pretending to be somebody we aren't (like a would-be ruler of the world)?.
      Why do we want to be dragged as ourselves into the game enviornment????

      This is why Project Natal will fail.

    6. Re:Digital medical records by lurker412 · · Score: 1

      I'm hoping this idea is merely ridiculous, not scary as shit.

    7. Re:Digital medical records by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Give me a H
      Give me an I
      Give me a P
      Give me a A
      what does that spell

      HIPA!

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    8. Re:Digital medical records by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that what you actually wanted to spell is "HIPPA" - "Health Insurance Privacy and Portability Act".

    9. Re:Digital medical records by tsa · · Score: 2, Insightful

      My reaction was exactly the same when I saw that website. Why should I willingly enter all my medical data on any webpage, let alone one that is run by Microsoft?

      --

      -- Cheers!

    10. Re:Digital medical records by HideyoshiJP · · Score: 0

      No, you want the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act.

    11. Re:Digital medical records by Presto+Vivace · · Score: 1

      to say nothing of humiliating your customer as a business model.

    12. Re:Digital medical records by Atrox666 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I used to think this until I realized that I was paying Blizzard for the simulated experience of waiting for public transportation.
      I could get a more immersive experience by putting on a troll mask and riding the subway. There are even some dialects of Chinese that sound a little like murloc. On the other hand I'd love for my IRL military training to count in call of duty.

    13. Re:Digital medical records by TDyl · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I can see my love of FRPG games taking a nose dive if this ever is enabled; I'd never even be able to kill a goblin in real life let alone in, I don't know, Neverwinter Nights, so does that mean my game experience stops after 10 minutes of play and I've wasted my money? I play games to excise the real world not continue to react with it. Additionally the thought of a private business, let alone the farking gubbermint, having access to my health data is an anathema to me; this patent is patently stupid and M$ employees must be overpaid and incredibly bored to think this will generate precious revenue for the Ballmerites. Disclaimer: English, living in England, slim, mid-40's and, at the moment, an avid RPGer.

      --
      Todd: I hope it proves as delicious as the farmers that grew them
    14. Re:Digital medical records by Toonol · · Score: 2, Funny

      This is why Project Natal will fail.

      Or perhaps why it will succeed.

      I tied with you for most contentless post.

    15. Re:Digital medical records by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      Dude, relax.

      It could just be an exercise game, like Yourself! Fitness or Dance Dance Revolution in workout mode. In which case, the game itself would know when you've been slacking, as you haven't logged in for a few days.

    16. Re:Digital medical records by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 5, Informative

      Well, I used Wii Fit to level up my rig -- I lost 20 pounds in the first two months while adding a significant amount of mass onto my arms and shoulders.

      I'm now at about 165 pounds. My peak weight 10 years ago was about 250.

      I note that Mario Kart uses your Mii info to determine what weight class you race in once you unlock yourself. That's probably enough prior art to invalidate this patent.

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    17. Re:Digital medical records by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      I was an air craft mechanic and a medic. In Desert Storm, all I had a was a .38 sp revolver. Wouldn't do much for me in CoD.

      Now, if all my years of SCA fighter practice and wars was good for something, beside helping out Tandy Leather and Duck brand tape...

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    18. Re:Digital medical records by quadelirus · · Score: 1

      I think it seems much more likely that what they want to do is market a device that rewards you for getting in shape, not secretly find your medical records and not let you pay.

      Probably something like,

      "Hey parents, tired of your kids playing too many video games and getting fat? Well now you can buy this bracelet that they will have to wear or else their xbox won't work and the bracelet will only allow them to play when they are healthy."

      Seriously, though. Business is about money. MS isn't going to secretly tap into your medical records to keep you from playing their games. Whatever the reason is for their doing this, you can be sure it is profit motivated, and more than likely something along the lines of what I suggested, and nothing sinister at all.

    19. Re:Digital medical records by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'd love for my IRL military training to count in call of duty

      I'd love to see someone in combat running around hopping like a rabbit wielding akimbo style shotguns, I'm sure that guy would make it home.

    20. Re:Digital medical records by myrdos2 · · Score: 1

      I bet the project natal cams will be able to figure out your weight.

    21. Re:Digital medical records by agentc0re · · Score: 1

      So THAT's why we're going to have electronic medical records...

      There fixed that for you.

      --
      Sometimes, the answer is to just destroy it all.
    22. Re:Digital medical records by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You won't have to because the game will check your weight
        on its own when you stand on the Wii Fit like balance board, or capture your body shape when you stand in front of the camera!

    23. Re:Digital medical records by citizenr · · Score: 3, Interesting

      On the other hand I'd love for my IRL military training to count in call of duty.

      Try Operation Flashpoint. I played that with 3 of my friends (CoOp) and we struggled, replaying some missions over 7 times. Then we exchanged one of the players for an active Finnish Army Medic and blasted thru the game with only one casaulty.

      --
      Who logs in to gdm? Not I, said the duck.
    24. Re:Digital medical records by Have+Brain+Will+Rent · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not being yourself will be available as a future upgrade for a slight additional cost. After all escape from reality shouldn't just be free, right? Think of how that would cut into the profits of drug deale... errr drug manufacturers... and the makers of fine alcohol.

      --
      The tyrant will always find a pretext for his tyranny - Aesop
    25. Re:Digital medical records by kdemetter · · Score: 1

      "Only requisite health levels are allowed to compete in a certain competition level"

      Something tells me the average hard core gamer doesn't have the required health level.

      So basically they are telling potential customers ( gamers ) , to do less of what they like ( to play games ) , to do more of what they dislike ( work out , etc ) .

      If gamers would actually follow this , the end result is that they will play less games ( since they need time to stay in shape ) . So that means , less need to buy new games -> less sales -> less profit for the game companies .

    26. Re:Digital medical records by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They aren't going to have access to your medical records genius.

    27. Re:Digital medical records by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      Why do we want to be dragged as ourselves into the game enviornment????

      Still, I can't wait to try their new RPG, Microsoft Office, I hear it's awesome. The PHB textures are unparalleled (unless you have a multi-CPU license of course).

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    28. Re:Digital medical records by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To get those kinds of results, you obviously play too much video games :)

    29. Re:Digital medical records by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Actually, no, it wasn't games. I worked in a mall while I was in my first year at College. For lunch, I'd often have a donair, poutine, and a orange julius. For snacks, I'd get a pack of bars from the chocolatier. I never cared enough about my appearance to work out or restrict my diet in any way. I got basically no meaningful exercise, even though I thought that I did.

      My wife (I can't remember if she was my girlfriend or fiancee at the time) won a prize that included 2 bikes. I biked to class one day, not realizing just how terribly out of shape I was. It took some time, since I had to stop and take breaks. (My rule was that I could take breaks, but I couldn't walk my bike.) I kept biking, and kept biking, and went down to about 185. The extra effort from the Wii has kept me at 165 for the last year and a half (It's starting to drop again from spin classes)

      Interestingly enough, if I'd spent my money on video games, I'd never have gained the weight in the first place. I'd be nowhere near as strong as I am now, though -- thanks to the biking, I have superior lower body strength; thanks to the excess weight, I have resilient tendons and good skeletal structure.

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    30. Re:Digital medical records by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a private business, let alone the farking gubbermint, having access to my health data is an anathema to me; ... English, living in England, slim, mid-40's and, at the moment.

      You too? I would also hate for a private business like Slashdot to know that I am in my 30s, 150lbs, 6'0, have had strep throat once as a child, all of the required vaccinations throughout life, and that my blood type is O positive.

    31. Re:Digital medical records by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Can you please explain...

    32. Re:Digital medical records by Exception+Duck · · Score: 1

      Shouldn't you be allowed to give companies access to your medical records if you choose to do so ?
      Either for access to said product/monetary incentive/common good (medical research)

      Of course they should no be able to access it without permission - which I'm pretty sure they do not have (depends on which country)

    33. Re:Digital medical records by takev · · Score: 1

      How about an athlete, is he allowed to play video games?
      If one does the standard weight/height ratio on an athlete. Seeing as many athletes are over 100 kg.
      I guess he needs to sit on the cough for couple of weeks, so his muscles becomes smaller.

    34. Re:Digital medical records by NitroWolf · · Score: 1

      I thought one idea of games was to escape various aspects of the real world, by pretending to be somebody we aren't (like a would-be ruler of the world)?.
      Why do we want to be dragged as ourselves into the game enviornment????

      You can still do that. Just because there might be an environment out there that is more of an extension of the real world than what we have now doesn't mean we have to jettison what we have now. I think it would be pretty cool if handled properly and expanded a great deal. Unfortunately, I don't think it can be handled properly, nor do I think it will be an accurate representation of people online, since I'm sure someone will find a way to game the system and/or report false information, making it pretty much meaningless.

      Someday maybe, but not anytime soon. I suspect the patent will run out long before it becomes truly feasible... although with all the extensions on patents, then perhaps not.

    35. Re:Digital medical records by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is what games are for, just another example of Microsoft "missing the mark"

    36. Re:Digital medical records by dwye · · Score: 1

      NO GOD DAMNED GAME COMPANY SHOULD BE ABLE TO ACCESS YOUR FUCKING MEDICAL RECORDS TO FUCK WITH YOUR GAMING TO BEGIN WITH. (For ANY reason really.)

      Even for a "game" created for your own exercise program, prescribed by a doctor to help you lose weight? Granted, I wouldn't want this added to my WoW avatar, but I can imagine sane reasons for the idea behind this patent. Imagine that this was built into a Nivenesque autodoc, for example, and it seems as reasonable as it accessing your medical profile to control the dosage of your anti-psychotics.

    37. Re:Digital medical records by Ihmhi · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Man, someone needs to make a real-life D&D character sheet generator. Take I.Q., body fat, muscle mass, BMI, etc. into account and roll stats from that.

    38. Re:Digital medical records by rtb61 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Face it the patent is disgusting, "The physiological data can be gleaned from a third party health data collection repository, a healthcare smart card, a real-time physiological sensor" it is so mind bogglingly privacy invasive that truly only M$ could have come up with it, especially for that line alone.

      Why is M$ going out of it's way to make itself look stupid, clumsy and downright evil. There seems to be this major disconnect going on in Redmond between what they think is acceptable and what the rest of the planet thinks is acceptable. Ballmer driven patents, patent as much crap as you can, count the number of patents pat yourself on the back for a job well done and ignore the money you've wasted on patenting useless ideas, ignore the marketing damage done to the companies image as everyone discusses those patents.

      Seriously the stupid patent goes even further "In addition, the physical characteristics can include psychological and demographic information such as education level, geographic location, age, sex, intelligence quotient, socioeconomic class, occupation, marital/relationship status, religious belief, political affiliation, etc. Such information can be useful in enhancing social interaction as well as adjusting how an avatar performs in a competitive virtual environment." you really couldn't make up a story where a company would be stupid enough to put that into a patent. So, what does that mean, if your a gay, overweight, atheist, who votes socialist, you are pretty much fucked and will not win any game ever or what ever else marketing dollars decide is the ultra consumerist lifestyle.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    39. Re:Digital medical records by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      I'm sure that want all that info to pursuade people to stop buying thier games and do something healthy instead. They woundn't dream of selling it.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    40. Re:Digital medical records by rve · · Score: 1

      I thought one idea of games was to escape various aspects of the real world, by pretending to be somebody we aren't (like a would-be ruler of the world)?.
      Why do we want to be dragged as ourselves into the game enviornment????

      Just as we were starting to think that the art of bullying was stagnant, old fashioned, stuck in the 80's here comes microsoft with a patent on fully automated online bullying. There may yet be a future for bullies after all! Maybe the xbox could come with a rolled up towel implement too, or take your glasses and break them.

    41. Re:Digital medical records by Richard+Dick+Head · · Score: 0, Troll

      seriously, what is up with all these fat fucks shitting a brick about this

    42. Re:Digital medical records by Richard+Dick+Head · · Score: 1

      http://www.healthvault.com/Personal/index.html

      "Microsoft won't use your information in HealthVault to personalize ads or services without explicit permission."

      Oh, thats comforting.

    43. Re:Digital medical records by Ciggy · · Score: 1

      I'm waiting^Wworking for the day when my wii in the wii fit doesn't change shape dramatically when matching mine...

      --

      A rose by any other name would smell as sweet;
      A chrysanthemum by any other name would be easier to spell
    44. Re:Digital medical records by TheLink · · Score: 1

      > I'd love to see someone in combat running around hopping like a rabbit wielding akimbo style shotguns, I'm sure that guy would make it home.

      He might actually. His teammates might require the nice bunch in white coats to come and take him home.

      --
    45. Re:Digital medical records by Xabraxas · · Score: 1

      All they do is play video games to escape the real world. They cannot possibly fathom gaming in an environment that mirrors their pathetic lives.

      --
      Time makes more converts than reason
    46. Re:Digital medical records by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot the dreaded catch 22

    47. Re:Digital medical records by terryducks · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well for one; HIPPA regulations (in the US).

      Tis a slippery slope down to MegaInsCorp refuses to let you buy that bag of Doritos. The car didn't start as the CORP tells me I need to lose a few pounds.

    48. Re:Digital medical records by shentino · · Score: 1

      Because the environment is still fantasy. It might still be you, but you're in spaaaaace, or something.

      You could call it a virtual vacation.

    49. Re:Digital medical records by shentino · · Score: 1

      Indeed. The only reason I don't approve of this idea is that, while good in theory, I don't trust scumbag companies not to abuse it.

      And...to be frank, I'm never signing the HIPAA release they'll need to get my health information anyway.

    50. Re:Digital medical records by shentino · · Score: 1

      Even more ridiculous is the notion that microsoft expects gamers to tell the truth when there's an advantage to be had by lying.

      Thanks to HIPAA it's not like they're going to be able to verify anything.

    51. Re:Digital medical records by GrubLord · · Score: 1

      My reaction was exactly the same when I saw that website. Why should I willingly enter all my medical data on any webpage, let alone one that is run by Microsoft?

      1. Because Microsoft is not subject to HIPAA (as far as I'm aware this is why they are allowed to run such a site in the first place), and are able to use that information to provide a variety of extremely useful health-related services above and beyond customising your game avatar, such as personalised reminders or health tips relevant to your health profile.

      2. Because two unrelated pharmacists might not know what other drugs you are taking, and HealthVault will tell you when mixing two medicines will kill you.

      3. Because personalised healthcare is the future of medicine and requires that 'baseline' data about your fitness while you are healthy be collected unobtrusively as part of your day-to-day life, and:

      4. Because having your medical records in one easily-accessible online repository could save your life in an emergency.

      Also, you don't enter the data. You authorise Microsoft to digitally transfer it from your hospital or GP to their servers.

    52. Re:Digital medical records by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Actually, if you know body fat and muscle mass, BMI is kinda useless. BMI is used to estimate how 'fat' you are (so I guess it tries to predict your body fat), but having a lot of muscle will give you a high BMI even if you are not fat. Now I'm not one of them BMI-haters, I believe it is quite useful for the average person to give an indication of how healthy their weight is, but if you have better data (body fat and muscle mass) by all means ignore BMI.

    53. Re:Digital medical records by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, that's you... I, on the other hand, pay Blizz for the simulated experience of being a mass-murdering, serial killing, thief... or a gung-ho mass-murdering, village plundering terrorist... or a serial killing, soul corrupting, demon f&^king satanist... waiting for public transportation. Don't know what your problem is.

    54. Re:Digital medical records by mhajicek · · Score: 2, Funny

      It could help if someone breaks into your house to steal your Playstation...

    55. Re:Digital medical records by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      Heh. Have a 1911, M1 Carbine, and M1 Garand at home. Much better armed than when I was in the military.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    56. Re:Digital medical records by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You guys are idiots... This would not look into the medical records, of course... due to HIPAA. All they would have to do is make a scale like system to weigh and idividual. Making it so it knew how much you truely weigh, (And of course there will always be a way to cheat with this system, i mean you can lie about your age on the internet so you can lie about your weight)

      Do you guys really take this personal? I think this is a great way for people who REALLY care about their weight and love games, to get into shape by motivating theirself by playing a game. It is a great! Idea.

    57. Re:Digital medical records by MarkKB · · Score: 1

      The physiological data can be gleaned from a third party health data collection repository, a healthcare smart card, a real-time physiological sensor" it is so mind bogglingly privacy invasive that truly only M$ could have come up with it, especially for that line alone.

      Your tin-foil hat is showing. I especially like the part where you assume that Microsoft is going to do this all, oh, I dunno, without your permission.

      I'd imagine this could be utilised in positive ways, for example, if someone puts themselves (or if parents put their child) on a diet, and try and forgo gaming until they reach a milestone, the sensor could bar you from using your Xbox 360 until such a time. The other obvious application is something like Wii Fit, where the avatar would resemble your actual... er, rotundness. (No one said this would be used on your Xbox Live avatar, merely that your in-game representation could now resemble you.)

      "In addition, the physical characteristics can include psychological and demographic information such as education level, geographic location, age, sex, intelligence quotient, socioeconomic class, occupation, marital/relationship status, religious belief, political affiliation, etc. Such information can be useful in enhancing social interaction as well as adjusting how an avatar performs in a competitive virtual environment." you really couldn't make up a story where a company would be stupid enough to put that into a patent.

      I dunno, it could just mean they're covering all the bases. The fact is, you're assuming this will be used for PURE EVIL MWAHAHAHA!!!

      Geographical information could be useful for rerouting you to local servers, and age could be used to seperate the LOLZ !#$% YEAH I AM TEH AWESOEM tweens from the older people, or to enforce parental control systems. Other information could be used if you wish to set up a game with only like-minded people (for example, only atheists or only LGBT).

      Just because you don't see a use doesn't mean it's not useful.

    58. Re:Digital medical records by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Poutine? Well Jesus, what did you expect? That's the Canadian equivalent of a medically-induced heart attack.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    59. Re:Digital medical records by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So THAT's why we're going to have digital medical records...

      SO my avatar in the games will be a stoopid fat redneck that smokes and tells racist jokes to much? How awesome is that.

    60. Re:Digital medical records by CyberSaint · · Score: 1

      Wait, this is M$FT... I thought humiliating the customer was already their business model.

    61. Re:Digital medical records by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This HAD to be because he was an army medic? Not because he was just plain better at games?

    62. Re:Digital medical records by abbyful · · Score: 1

      According to BMI, I could gain nearly 50 pounds and still be "normal weight". (50 extra pounds on my 115 pound frame? HA! No way!)

      In my non-medical viewpoint... Maybe I'm superficial, but to me it seems like "normal" for the woman's side is a bit chunky, while "normal" on the men's side is a bit too thin.

    63. Re:Digital medical records by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought one idea of games was to escape various aspects of the real world, by pretending to be somebody we aren't (like a would-be ruler of the world)?.
      Why do we want to be dragged as ourselves into the game enviornment????

      because some of us are tired of chubbies and twigs talking trash and trying to be internet badasses

    64. Re:Digital medical records by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you see the Onion video about the newest CoD-type game? It promised enhanced realism via missions where you wait around for orders that don't come, wash Hummers, and argue about celebrity tits.

      re: TFA, though ... bring it, and I'll write games for the disenfranchised lardos.

  2. It's a Free Market by TrippTDF · · Score: 4, Interesting

    if Microsoft does this, then the Playstation becomes the console for the large.

    1. Re:It's a Free Market by Rei · · Score: 5, Funny

      I can just imagine the slogan: "Escape your depressing real life into a matching world!"

      Logging on...

      "Our records show that you are an overweight high-school educated 36-year old mail in Akron, Ohio with below-average IQ, part-time employment at a Wal-Mart with an annual take-home of $16k who is a single Baptist Republican."

      Creating avatar... done.

      "Congratulations! Explore our virtual world with your new avatar -- an overweight, high-school educated 36-year old male with below-average IQ."

      Your avatar will spawn in: Virtual Akron Ohio
      You start with the following items: Bible, Pat Robertson DVD, "Going Rogue" by Sarah Palin
      You start with: 0 gold
      You earn: 7 gold per hour
      For doing the following task: Checking groceries at the Virtual Akron Wal-Mart.

      --
      Nobody pushes buttons like our bunny. Big red buttons with labels that say "IGNITION", apparently.
    2. Re:It's a Free Market by gstoddart · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Wow, recursive suck. How depressing. :-P

      Cheers

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    3. Re:It's a Free Market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you pitched this Sims expansion pack idea of yours to EA?

    4. Re:It's a Free Market by Weeksauce · · Score: 1

      Finally! I now might be competitive in COD: MW2!

      --
      An inventor is a man who asks 'Why?' of the universe and lets nothing stand between the answer and his mind.
    5. Re:It's a Free Market by selven · · Score: 1

      I believe you mean:

      You start with: 0 gold
      You earn: 7 gold per hour
      For doing the following task: Gold farming in an MMO, in which you are a 36-year old male in Virtual Akron, Ohio.

    6. Re:It's a Free Market by Smivs · · Score: 1

      As a Linux user, does this mean I have to have a penguin-like avatar?

    7. Re:It's a Free Market by Volante3192 · · Score: 2, Funny

      And you spend your spare time... playing a game as a virtual virtual wal-mart stocker.

    8. Re:It's a Free Market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PS3 already is, didn't you see the commercial:

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x7PhJp3ciRQ

    9. Re:It's a Free Market by Zarf · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Your Avatar's hobbies include playing this game... as you.

      --
      [signature]
    10. Re:It's a Free Market by AnotherShep · · Score: 1

      If you're fat? Yes.

    11. Re:It's a Free Market by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 5, Funny

      You earn: 7 gold per hour
      For doing the following task: Checking groceries at the Virtual Akron Wal-Mart.

      Not for long. I'm certain there are Chinese gamers who will do it for half that much.
      Welcome to the long term unemployed quest!

    12. Re:It's a Free Market by TheCarp · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I seriously think I would be busting a gut laughing no matter who came out with it.

      So... lets just forget all about HPAA or whatever other health record privacy regulations you may be subject to. Lets just assume they can get around all that in a reasonable way.... and figure out how to get all the data that they want from health records....

      So now, I can diet all I want, but my avatar wont get skinnier until I go in for a checkup? Will my insurance be expected to cover extra checkups to keep my avatar current?

      Wouldn't people who are overweight, just.... not play the game. It seems a lot easier. Especially since, there are many other games that wont force them into a suck gaming experience.

      This smacks to me of the drug war. "Look kids, drugs are bad, because if you do them, we will throw you in jail". That doesn't make drugs bad, it makes you a dick. Its "I don't approve of your condition and the negative impacts that it has on your life, so I am goin gto impose new negative impacts to help you".

      Its exactly the sort of attitude that you resent when your friends and family take it with you... and you expect anyone is going to put up with it from Sony?

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    13. Re:It's a Free Market by Lonewolf666 · · Score: 1

      I think you have missed the news about Sony misbehaving. Like this:
      http://it.slashdot.org/it/05/10/31/2016223.shtml
      Most /. readers were Not Amused.

      --
      C - the footgun of programming languages
    14. Re:It's a Free Market by Whiteox · · Score: 5, Funny

      I, on the other hand, am a 6'6" tall, bulging muscles on skeleton type of guy who has any woman I desire at any time, even when fighting off foes, a superb intellect and the sun shines out of my arse (ass for you yanks).
      Now where's my avatar?

      --
      Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
    15. Re:It's a Free Market by Smivs · · Score: 1

      As a Linux user, does this mean I have to have a penguin-like avatar?

      If you're fat? Yes.

      OK, here's my avatar!

    16. Re:It's a Free Market by CannonballHead · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Right, because Christians and republicans are representative of the world's overweight and stupid people.

      I know, it's just a joke. Just figured I'd mention it.

    17. Re:It's a Free Market by kalirion · · Score: 5, Funny

      According to your medical records, you are a compulsive liar. In order to protect the children, you will not be able to access our online community. If you persist in attempting to register, the FBI will be notified.

    18. Re:It's a Free Market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. Maybe Microsoft will learn that this is a fool's errand once their video game sales plummet after the public's negative reaction to this ridiculous attempt to revolutionize the gaming community.

    19. Re:It's a Free Market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A late entry for /. post of the year

    20. Re:It's a Free Market by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      In EQ, I (a 6'5" blacksmith type) played a gnome.

      In the game, those who played handsome muscular avatars got more female hookups.

      Next game, I'm a tall handsome avatar.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    21. Re:It's a Free Market by cmburns69 · · Score: 1

      Ah yes, I am quite fond of World of World of Warcraft!

      --
      Online Starcraft RPG? At
      Dietary fiber is like asynchronous IO-- Non-blocking!
    22. Re:It's a Free Market by jo_ham · · Score: 2, Funny

      Gee... I'm a Southern Baptist (who regularly attend church, Creationist, etc...), however; I neither care for Pat Robertson nor Sarah Palin.

      In that case, you'll just have to evolve a sense of humour.

      Oh, sorry.

    23. Re:It's a Free Market by badboy_tw2002 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Check off humorless and touchy as well!

    24. Re:It's a Free Market by icannotthinkofaname · · Score: 1

      Its "I don't approve of your condition and the negative impacts that it has on your life, so I am goin gto impose new negative impacts to help you".

      I believe the point is that the existing negative impacts haven't deterred the behavior so far. What would you do to discourage negative behaviors for which the natural impacts do not deter the behavior?

      This avatar patent is just negative reinforcement to encourage healthy behavior, no matter who owns it. For a player of this game, if the player is in a healthy weight range, the game takes away the unfavorable image of a fat avatar.

      --
      Let q be a radix > 1. I am in ur base-q, killing 10 d00ds.
    25. Re:It's a Free Market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      haha Rei. Very nice.

    26. Re:It's a Free Market by elfprince13 · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's only one level deep, so it's more like plain old meta-suck.

    27. Re:It's a Free Market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if Microsoft does this, then the Playstation becomes the console for the large.

      do you not mean for the masses...

    28. Re:It's a Free Market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Starting with zero gold would make him considerably better off than most Americans.

    29. Re:It's a Free Market by earlymon · · Score: 3, Funny

      I, on the other hand, am a 6'6" tall, bulging muscles on skeleton type of guy who has any woman I desire at any time, even when fighting off foes, a superb intellect and the sun shines out of my arse (ass for you yanks).
      Now where's my avatar?

      Your avatar request is fully noted and your order parameters and pre-ship details appear below.

      Many good lucks to you in your gaming! /snappy SALUTE!

      Sincerely yours,
      Orders@Aurora_Avatars.com

      Order fulfillment details:

      1. You are exceptionally well-built and can get laid all the time by any woman you desire.

      2. Avatar Analysis Wizard results indicate that there are not enough women you desire to lay, and would prefer to fill your time role-playing in a game.

      3. Your avatar is one with a chiseled face, piercing eyes, skin colored a near-perfect, brushed-metal bronze, a shock of thick, yet somehow simultaneously lithe and responsive, magnificent mane of hair - in short, nearly possessing the good looks of an Auroran (such as the the real-life appearance of the president and founder of Aurora Avatars).

      4 The most outstanding feature of your new avatar is the letter on your forehead in hyper-glow, yellow-green-white, that eerily seems to almost float, retaining its holographic-like legibility regardless of how you turn your head.

      (** Copyright claimed by me, as creator, for Aurora Avatars and all related trade names, and product descriptions)

      --
      Pathological kinda promises Path + Logical - but instead, you get stuck with pathetic.
    30. Re:It's a Free Market by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

      I doubt very much there's any intelligent pro-Sony, pro-OSS person.

      Yes, the PS2 had Linux. It cost $200, and included a hard drive. There was no other legal way to do it. But hey, at least it had full access to the hardware.

      The PS3 also has Linux, but this time, they've crippled it by running it in a hypervisor -- that is, a virtual machine.

      Linux people also tend to be anti-DRM. Sony has, among other things, created DVDs which couldn't be played in most computers (or many Sony DVD players) by deliberately breaking the spec in a way they assumed would apply only to PCs, and released music CDs with a Windows rootkit installed on autoplay which makes your computer measurably less secure and slower, all in order to prevent you from "unauthorized" use, which apparently includes ripping.

      I mean, I'm sure there are some people who are simultaneously Linux fanboys and Sony fanboys, but it's a position that doesn't make much sense.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    31. Re:It's a Free Market by TomorrowPlusX · · Score: 1

      You know, I just wanted to let you know that we yanks know perfectly well what an arse is, we don't need to have your mystical moon-man speak translated for us.

      Yes yes yes, it must make you feel all high-falutin-etc to condescend to let us in on your colloquialisms. But it's not a secret. We know what arse means. We also know that you call a car's trunk a "boot", and that you like to spell color with a 'u'.

      We get it. Carry on.

      --

      lorem ipsum, dolor sit amet
    32. Re:It's a Free Market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      do you also fart lightning bolts while having sex ?

    33. Re:It's a Free Market by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      I have Sim Stapler on my iPhone. And I'm allowed to play my music at a reasonable volume.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    34. Re:It's a Free Market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "According to your medical records, you are a compulsive liar. In order to protect the children, you will not be able to access our online community. If you persist in attempting to register, the FBI will be notified."

      However, we do have several messages for you from prominent politicians, on both sides of the Atlantic, requesting that you consider offers of work as their advisers....

    35. Re:It's a Free Market by twidarkling · · Score: 3, Funny

      Unless during your character's off-hours, you sign them up for this service to go play games. Wherein the character's character would then go work at the Virtual Virtual Akron Wal-Mart...

      --
      Canada: The US's more awesome sibling.
    36. Re:It's a Free Market by Hilltopperpete · · Score: 0, Troll

      I can just imagine the slogan: "Escape your depressing real life into a matching world!"

      Logging on...

      "Our records show that you are an overweight high-school educated 36-year old mail in Akron, Ohio with below-average IQ, part-time employment at a Wal-Mart with an annual take-home of $16k who is a single Baptist Republican."

      Creating avatar... done.

      "Congratulations! Explore our virtual world with your new avatar -- an overweight, high-school educated 36-year old male with below-average IQ."

      Your avatar will spawn in: Virtual Akron Ohio You start with the following items: Bible, Pat Robertson DVD, "Going Rogue" by Sarah Palin You start with: 0 gold You earn: 7 gold per hour For doing the following task: Checking groceries at the Virtual Akron Wal-Mart.

      Oh please... overweight, below average IQ, republican, and Christian? That's your stereotype? Here's a mold-breaker for you. I'm 24, married (going on three years, woot!), 6'3", 225 lbs of solid muscle, a software entrepreneur, and I have an IQ of 175. Jesus is my homeboy.

    37. Re:It's a Free Market by g2devi · · Score: 0

      Please examine your records again. He's not a compulsive liar. He just tends to write and talk in a misleading way.

      It's not really his fault. His IQ is only 68.

      And yes, that is a superb intellect. Relative to everyone around him he's a genius. Remember he lives in a state where there's a lot of inbreeding.

      And while one of his hands is normal, but "the other hand" is a freaky 6'6" tall due to a birth defect.
      And the sun really does shine out of his ass due to a medical condition, but doctors hope to be able to fix that soon along with his freaky hand.

      And he has bulging muscles, but he also has bulging seals and dolphins since he works at an aquarium and tends to overfeed the animals.

      And yes he does have any woman he desires at any time, but he only desires truly desperate women who are at the end of their ropes and there are a lot of them in his state due to the slim pickings in the backwoods. People with "high paying" aquarium jobs are hard to come by.

      Have mercy on him. Please allow my friend to register with an Avatar appropriate to his condition.

    38. Re:It's a Free Market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your comment raises a bigger question -- if I fail a drug test, will they make my Avatar permanently stoned?

    39. Re:It's a Free Market by fafaforza · · Score: 1

      So anyone that objects to a certain generalization is assumed to be under that generalization? No wonder none of the gay marriage proposals get passed.

    40. Re:It's a Free Market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Welcome to the liberal agenda. They (liberals, and now Microsoft) know what's best for you. Just try to fit in, ok?

    41. Re:It's a Free Market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IQ of 175 and too stupid to understand the difference between single cases and averages? Get back down to your church and pray for an IQ higher than your waist size in inches, 'cos you're full of shit.

    42. Re:It's a Free Market by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      So, how do I get a skinny avatar when my lean body mass alone puts me into the medically accept BMI class of overweight. Then when you add on the amount of fat that is required for the human body to survive, I am considered close to 'obese'. By the medical industries standards, I have to be be a work out dude to get down into 'overweight', and I have to literally amputate body parts to get to a 'normal' weight. I'm not sure I would be prepared to amputate a leg just to meet some ill conceived notion of 'healthy'. Of course if I have to remove more than a leg, I have to make sure I don't choose the other leg as my next amputation, because if I did, I would be shorter, and that would push be back into being 'over weight' again.

    43. Re:It's a Free Market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're not patenting it so they can implement it, they're patenting it because the patent system is fucked and basically a land grab. They have every incentive to pay people to come up with ideas like this and none against. If no one uses it, fine. If someone does (maybe with the user's blessing...a game like Wii Fit for instance, which IIRC does fatten your avatar based on your weight), charge 'em.

    44. Re:It's a Free Market by DuChamp+Fitz · · Score: 1

      bulging muscles on skeleton type

      I can't help imagining the cryptkeeper on steroids.

    45. Re:It's a Free Market by DuChamp+Fitz · · Score: 1

      I prefer Second Second Life, because there are no winners and losers...

    46. Re:It's a Free Market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you are an overweight high-school educated 36-year old mail

      So does this mean your avatar is a giant envelope?

    47. Re:It's a Free Market by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      Well, you should've thought of that before you were conceived. Had you chosen a different set of genes you might not be too heavy to play video games.

      I wonder what they'd do if a body builder tries to play. "Unhealthy body mass detected. Assigning insultingly overweight avatar and imposing equally insulting gameplay restrictions... now."


      Besides, it's not just weight. They've also patented games discriminating based on age, sex, religion and a number of other things that just scream "someone please sue us".

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    48. Re:It's a Free Market by Eudial · · Score: 1

      When I read this, the first thought I had was: Who the hell would want to play this game?

      If you are given the choice between:
      1. A game that heckles you for your appearance.
      2. A game that doesn't heckle you for your appearance.

      Which game would you chose to play?

      This seems like a surefire way of making sure your games don't sell all that well.

      --
      GAAH! MY PRINTER IS ON FIRE!!! PUT IT OUT! PUT IT OUT!
    49. Re:It's a Free Market by LoRdTAW · · Score: 1

      Prove it.

    50. Re:It's a Free Market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Erm

      It's Microsoft*

      Not Sony...

      I sense Sony Hate?

    51. Re:It's a Free Market by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Goddammit stop calling it MW2!

      You think counterstrike-esque, I think bipedal fusion powered tanks beating the shit out of each other.

      Get off my lawn!

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    52. Re:It's a Free Market by sznupi · · Score: 1

      "Discriminating"? In the same way that video camera used during documentary discriminates, right?

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    53. Re:It's a Free Market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Brushed-metal bronze...

      http://www.hotchickswithdouchebags.com/uploaded_images/Poo-766575.jpg

    54. Re:It's a Free Market by xatm092 · · Score: 1

      I actually have no problem with this, considering how anyone that spends much of their life playing an MMORPG should be shot.

    55. Re:It's a Free Market by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      No, the video camera records everyone the same way. Remember, "to discriminate" means that you treat things differently based one some property they have. If the game uses your health record to determine whether you get to choose your avatar that's discrimination - it uses a known property of yours to decide how to treat you. If it decides to let you pick your avatar you were discriminated in favor of; if it doesn't let you pick your avatar you were discriminated against.

      The problem is that most people don't want to be the target of obvious discrimination as it's pretty easy to discriminate in bad ways (such as denying service to people of a faith you don't agree with). Thus, certain kinds of discrimination are discriminated against by the law. Patenting a framework that enables exactly that kind of discrimination sounds, well, bold. At best nobody cares; at worst Microsoft ends in PR hell as minority groups (including ones for the "minority" of women) tear them a new one and the media gleefully bring stories that portray Microsoft as antisemitic, racist, sexist and whatever else they can come up with.

      Discrimination based on weight is known but not highly politicized. Discrimination based on sex and religion is and the mere suggestion sounds like the nightmare of every PR department.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    56. Re:It's a Free Market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because all liberals are are fit, members of mensa, and make over $150,000 a year?

    57. Re:It's a Free Market by earlymon · · Score: 1

      Eggsactly!

      --
      Pathological kinda promises Path + Logical - but instead, you get stuck with pathetic.
    58. Re:It's a Free Market by Rei · · Score: 1

      You realize that there's no way for me to win, right? Had I made the character a liberal, I'd have liberals complaining instead.

      --
      Nobody pushes buttons like our bunny. Big red buttons with labels that say "IGNITION", apparently.
    59. Re:It's a Free Market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lovely..... Pity MS won't have a "Is your head smeared with shit?" checkbox.

    60. Re:It's a Free Market by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      Erm, you missed the comment that I was replying to who claimed nobody would complain if it were Sony.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    61. Re:It's a Free Market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is ridiculous. Who do they plan to get to write games? Or test them? Have you seen the MS dev groups? They need to be carried around on busses.

    62. Re:It's a Free Market by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 1

      When I read this, the first thought I had was: Who the hell would want to play this game?

      If you are given the choice between:
      1. A game that heckles you for your appearance.
      2. A game that doesn't heckle you for your appearance.

      Which game would you chose to play?

      Dunno, proper motivation uses both a carrot and a stick, and you're only comparing the stick parts. What if the game that heckles you for your appearance also conjures your own personal $incredibly_hot_celebrity clone out of thin air once you've beaten the final boss and reached $target_weight?

      In any case, this particular concept seems to be aimed at parents and not so much at their kids. Think of it as a "no more halo 3 for you till you've done 10 laps around the block you fat fart!". Electronic parenting ftw?

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
  3. Wii Fit already does this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Prior art in Wii Fit.

  4. Prior art: Nintendo Wii Fit by base3 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    "That's obese!"

    --
    One CPU cycle wasted on digital restrictions management is ONE TOO MANY.
    1. Re:Prior art: Nintendo Wii Fit by Itninja · · Score: 1

      I often thought they should invent a Wii Fit for the mind. It would be like a helmet that you wear and it would scan your brainwave looking for thoughts that society disapproves of. When you go way off the reservation it would say "that's obtuse!".

      --
      I judt got a nre Kinesis keybiartf so please excusr ant egregiou typos.
    2. Re:Prior art: Nintendo Wii Fit by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      I often thought they should invent a Wii Fit for the mind. It would be like a helmet that you wear and it would scan your brainwave looking for thoughts that society disapproves of.

      Isn't that what the Scientologists do? ;-)

      Cheers

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    3. Re:Prior art: Nintendo Wii Fit by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1


      Society doesn't need to punish you for having wayward thoughts. They just bring you up to feel guilt and you punish yourself. ;)

      Anyway, yeah - fat people. For some reason society has decided its okay to mock them. Even better, a normal healthy weight is "fat" and only absurdly low fat percentages are "normal", meaning that's even more people that you're allowed to tell them what they should be doing with their diets / bodies.

      Now admittedly the USA has some fat, fucking people, but that doesn't mean the air-brushed media people aren't some irritating smug cunts.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    4. Re:Prior art: Nintendo Wii Fit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyway, yeah - fat people. For some reason society has decided its okay to mock them. Even better, a normal healthy weight is "fat" and only absurdly low fat percentages are "normal", meaning that's even more people that you're allowed to tell them what they should be doing with their diets / bodies.

      Fight the power, lardass.

    5. Re:Prior art: Nintendo Wii Fit by Itninja · · Score: 4, Funny

      the USA has some fat, fucking people

      Oh, I am pretty sure those two things are universally exclusive.

      --
      I judt got a nre Kinesis keybiartf so please excusr ant egregiou typos.
    6. Re:Prior art: Nintendo Wii Fit by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1

      Fight the power, lardass.

      Yeah, thanks, Mr. A. Coward. I'm slightly overweight but not much. I did however have a very close friend whose life was made very miserable because of the abuse she got about her weight. I don't like this obsession with judging people for their weight, and I'm fine with not liking that.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    7. Re:Prior art: Nintendo Wii Fit by castironpigeon · · Score: 1

      Oh, I am pretty sure those two things are universally exclusive.

      Not really. Fat people just fuck other fat people producing many small fat people. If fat people didn't fuck that'd solve the whole problem, wouldn't it?

      --
      mmmm...forbidden donut
    8. Re:Prior art: Nintendo Wii Fit by Itninja · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Or one could say her life was made miserable because of her weight. The grotesquely obese (of which i am a member) are such by choice. There may be genetic traits that can lead one to being overweight, but so what. There are also genetic traits that make certain people's breath smell like death, or make people gravitate toward alcoholism. We are not animals. We are not slaves to every wisp of DNA-inspired urge or weakness. I, for one, am still fat because I have not yet chosen to make the lifestyle changes needed to lose weight. I am not a victim.

      --
      I judt got a nre Kinesis keybiartf so please excusr ant egregiou typos.
    9. Re:Prior art: Nintendo Wii Fit by Z1NG · · Score: 1

      Anyway, yeah - fat people. For some reason society has decided its okay to mock them. Even better, a normal healthy weight is "fat" and only absurdly low fat percentages are "normal", meaning that's even more people that you're allowed to tell them what they should be doing with their diets / bodies.

      According to random numbers found here, acceptable body fat percentages for men are between 18%-26% and between 25%-31% for women. These numbers aren't even vaguely "absurdly low". Now, if you are talking about the media's version of what is "healthy" I agree. I really dislike that women (and to a lesser extent men) are pressured into being overly thin and often develop eating disorders.
      I don't see a problem with this type of game though. As you said there are many overweight people and I think this could serve to motivate some of them. Anyone that might be discouraged by it doesn't need to play. As someone else mentioned the wii fit already does this.

    10. Re:Prior art: Nintendo Wii Fit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the USA has some fat, fucking people

      Oh, I am pretty sure those two things are universally exclusive.

      Take a stroll through Planned Parenthood and you will realize that they are not universally, mutually, or even casually exclusive.

    11. Re:Prior art: Nintendo Wii Fit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the USA has some fat, fucking people

      Oh, I am pretty sure those two things are universally exclusive.

      As an overweight man with an overweight wife, I assure you they are not mutually exclusive.

    12. Re:Prior art: Nintendo Wii Fit by presearch · · Score: 3, Funny

      Only if you're morbidly obtuse.

    13. Re:Prior art: Nintendo Wii Fit by badboy_tw2002 · · Score: 1

      Well said - personal responsibility is seemingly lacking everywhere these days. People's perceptions are never going to change and that's just how it is. The only variable you can change in life is you.

    14. Re:Prior art: Nintendo Wii Fit by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1

      According to random numbers [wikipedia.org] found here, acceptable body fat percentages for men are between 18%-26% and between 25%-31% for women. These numbers aren't even vaguely "absurdly low". Now, if you are talking about the media's version of what is "healthy" I agree.

      I was, hence the quotes around "fat" and "normal". What medical science and what popular media consider healthy and normal are widely divergent.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    15. Re:Prior art: Nintendo Wii Fit by Minwee · · Score: 5, Funny

      the USA has some fat, fucking people

      Oh, I am pretty sure those two things are universally exclusive.

      Welcome to the Internet. I can see that this is your first time here.

      There is so much for you to see and wish to unsee.

    16. Re:Prior art: Nintendo Wii Fit by h4rm0ny · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Or one could say her life was made miserable because of her weight.

      You could but that would be logically incorrect. People's cruelty was the first order cause. To illustrate this, your reasoning would also say that it is the fault of someone for being black if they receive insults about being black, the fault of someone for being Christian if they receive insults about being Christian, the fault of someone for choosing to be a computer programmer if they are laughed at by non-computer programmers.

      As to your being grotesquely obese but not being a victim of insults or abuse or being judged, I can only assume that you either live in a spectacularly more enlightened part of the world than most of the USA, or that you simply don't care about it. I suspect the latter. Again, your logic is flawed. That you don't care about the abuse does not mean that someone else does not. That is a deductive fallacy.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    17. Re:Prior art: Nintendo Wii Fit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ya think? You haven't seen all the fat asses walking around like a sow with her litter of piglets?

    18. Re:Prior art: Nintendo Wii Fit by Itninja · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Friend, my logic is not flawed. Both ones race and ones religion are federally protected in all democratic societies an the planet (at least on paper). People are not born fat (as black people are born black). And are no forms of worship that I know of that demand (or even encourage) obesity. There is no Constitutional protection for being fat. It's easy to point at the fat guy and laugh, sure. But it's also easy to point at the stumbling drunk or the teenager with raging BO. People are mean to other people sometimes. That is not a discrimination; that is life.

      Maya Anjelou once gave a great statement on this concept. She said (among other things) "The real difficulty is to overcome how you think about yourself."

      --
      I judt got a nre Kinesis keybiartf so please excusr ant egregiou typos.
    19. Re:Prior art: Nintendo Wii Fit by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      The grotesquely obese (of which i am a member) are such by choice.

      The same can be said of the abusive cunts.

    20. Re:Prior art: Nintendo Wii Fit by harmonise · · Score: 1

      People are not born fat

      Have you seen a new-born child? I would bet that their body-fat percentage is very high.

      --
      Cory Doctorow talking about cloud computing makes as much sense as George W Bush talking about electrical engineering.
    21. Re:Prior art: Nintendo Wii Fit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Excellent. I am also obese but I just haven't decided I don't like it. I did however, end the scourge of dreaming. After all it is a wisp of DNA-inspired weakness. Never mind that other mammals do it. It is just sick and not good. I therefore don't have this problem anymore. It is a good thing I can overcome all DNA-inspired weakness.

    22. Re:Prior art: Nintendo Wii Fit by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1

      Friend, my logic is not flawed.

      Then, I'm sorry, but I'll just explain again, then.

      Both ones race and ones religion are federally protected in all democratic societies an the planet (at least on paper).

      This does not pertain to your argument. You're saying that legality has bearing on morality? Reality says otherwise. A lack of legislation about insulting people does not make insulting them acceptable to me.

      People are not born fat (as black people are born black).

      You have deliberately selected the one element I listed that is not a choice, in order to imply that the case of obesity is different to all my cases on the grounds that you consider it a choice. In fact, I listed a number of items which are choices (such as religion) where it remains publicly unacceptable to mock people for these attributes. There is also something insidious in your above statement which you appear unaware of. The direct inference of the above is that it is incorrect to insult people because of their skin colour because this is not a choice. Whereas personally I believe it is incorrect to insult people about their skin colour because it is not a reason to treat people badly in and of itself.

      The same principle ought to apply to people's weight, yes? Yet you seem to think that it is acceptable to insult people about their weight for some reason, even though it is similarly not of concern to other people in most circumstances. Apparently this reason has to do with people's ability to influence their weight to some degree. Apparently your logic is that it is okay to insult people for something if you believe that it was their choice. Apparently you believe that the insult is deserved if one chooses to do something that some of society doesn't like irrespective of whether that choice has anything to do with them. Unless of course you're arguing that people are cruel to people with weight problems because of it does do harm to them, but I'm certain that is not what you were arguing.

      And are no forms of worship that I know of that demand (or even encourage) obesity.

      You are implying that the basis of my argument was that some religion did, or that obesity being part of a religion is a requirement for it to be tolerated? Eh?

      There is no Constitutional protection for being fat.

      Again, law != morality. There's no constitutional protection against someone coming up to your partner in the street and insulting them, but I'm confident you'll agree it's wrong. And I would hope that you would leap to your partners defense. So I don't know why when I express dislike at people being judgemental about someone I cared about that you start telling me there's no constitutional protection for them, with the implication that they should expect and accept that abuse.

      It's easy to point at the fat guy and laugh, sure.

      Trust me - not if they're a friend of mine and I'm with them. I might be 230lb, but most of it is muscle in my case. Not that its really important - I'll merely take them apart verbally.

      But it's also easy to point at the stumbling drunk or the teenager with raging BO.

      Most people who are drunk are going to be sober in the morning and their being drunk is a source of humour even to them. If someone's a real alcoholic, then no, that's not particularly funny either. If a teenager has raging body odor, then they probably would be happier knowing and doing something about it. In any case, pointing out something else unpleasant doesn't make the first thing pleasant. Unless you're going to make the argument that cruelty is common that it should just be accepted.

      People are mean to other people sometimes. That is not a discrimination; that is life.

      Ah, I see yo

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    23. Re:Prior art: Nintendo Wii Fit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wii fit clearly makes your "Mii" fatter when you gain weight. Sounds like pretty effective shaming to me.

    24. Re:Prior art: Nintendo Wii Fit by kramerd · · Score: 1

      To be fair, you are the one who is logically incorrect. Im tired of retards trying to pull the race card like it affects anyone, anywhere, for any reason by giving ridiculous examples that are not, never have been, and never will be true.

      People do make a choice to be christian or computer programmers. Like being fat, this is known as a lifestyle choice.

      On the other hand, no one is going to claim that personal responsibility is required for being black. That is preposterous.

      I don't see how you can confuse something that can be made fun of because the person doing so is responsible (putting mayo on fries) with something that you can't control (having your parked car hit in a parking lot).

      Parent is not a victim because parent recognizes that fat is a chosen lifestyle. Like a crack addict that sucks dick in a bad part of town to get their next fix, they may realize that what they are doing is viewed badly by society, and that it makes them a whore, and that they can change, even though they havent yet. Calm down and realize that while cake may be cheaper, less addictive, and (slightly) less than harmful than crack, no one has ever stopped doing crack because people are calling them whores, blacks, or computer programmers. If people can be shamed into eating less cake, I say shaming them is valid societal pressure.

      Ask any mother why she, at some point, has told her daughter that she is gaining too much weight, and let me know if the answer is ever because her daughter is black. Im guessing that even outside of the US, this wont be true.

      Getting on the actual article, this was about fat avatars. If someone chooses to have a fat avatar, they can also choose to lie about it and get a skinny avatar. I'm guessing that most people will get a pokemon avatar, or a game character specific avatar, or an actual photo of themselves avatar,or a default xbox avatar long, long, long before they bother to put their weight information into a video game console. Who the hell is going to release their medical history to microsoft?

    25. Re:Prior art: Nintendo Wii Fit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am not a victim.

      Hum... not sure, but didn't MS just trys to get a patent to make you one? Read it somewhere... no clue where...

    26. Re:Prior art: Nintendo Wii Fit by iamhassi · · Score: 1

      "That's obese!"

      exactly: doesn't the Wii Fit do this already? If you're obese according to BMI it makes your avatar obese, if you're underweight it makes your avatar very skinny. Since the Wii Fit came out in 2007 and Microsoft didn't file until June 2008 I'd say that's enough prior air.

      Is Microsoft going to sue Nintendo for Wii Fit?

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    27. Re:Prior art: Nintendo Wii Fit by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1


      Careful calling people a retard. Do you want me to point out the obvious problem in your post?

      The OP stated that it was her fault people insulted her for being overweight. I merely showed other examples of exactly the same principle: someone being insulted because of an attribute about them. His argument includes all of the things I listed - yes, including race. Yet you treat obesity differently. Why? Because you say it is a choice? Here is the the very obvious problem in your post: You are making the argument that it is acceptable to mock people about their weight because you think they have control over it, and you illustrate this with a comparison to how it is not okay to insult someone about being black... because they don't have a choice.

      Wow! Now *that* is racist. The non-racist would immediately identify that the reason it is not okay to insult someone about being black is because there's nothing fucking wrong with being black. And the point of correlation is that just as its no relevance to anyone else what skin colour you have, is it is likewise nobody's business judging people about your weight.

      Why did you bring choice into it? Because your mental process is that the reason to hold back from judging someone is if they can't help it for some reason. How about the reason for not judging someone being that it's not your place to judge them?

      Don't like what I'm saying? Take a long look at your post before you reply and ask yourself if you honestly weren't just following the reasoning I've stated.

      Your reasoning, flawed though it is, is based on obesity being just a choice as if the matter is simple. Given how much better you usually feel if you're fit and active than if you're overweight and sedentary, then if it's just "a choice" then why are people choosing to be fat and if it's just a choice uninfluenced by external factors, then why is obesity more prevalent in some countries than in others, why does it run in families, why are poorer people in the USA more prone to obesity than more affluent people? It is demonstrable that external factors are a major factor in obesity by these observable facts. So even if you did feel that it is your place to judge others for being fat (and again, what puts you in that position?), then how do you reconcile that with "the choice" clearly being easy for some and very hard for others?

      Do you want to go back and take a look at my original post? I said that I didn't like the way my friend got a lot of abuse because she was overweight. I didn't like the way society discriminated against people for their weight. That was my post. I take it that you condone those things because, well, you're arguing with me. Or do you simply object on some principle to another person getting angry about discrimination? Which is it? Neither sounds like something I'd want to admit to but they're the only explanations for your post seeing as there were no factual corrections to be made.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    28. Re:Prior art: Nintendo Wii Fit by DuChamp+Fitz · · Score: 1

      To illustrate this, your reasoning would also say that it is the fault of someone for being black if they receive insults about being black, the fault of someone for being Christian if they receive insults about being Christian, the fault of someone for choosing to be a computer programmer if they are laughed at by non-computer programmers.

      You lost me on that last one.

    29. Re:Prior art: Nintendo Wii Fit by kramerd · · Score: 1

      I'm quite certain that I am correct. I'm also certain that your parents raised you improperly, you retard (by which I mean that you are foolish and socially inept...there is no reason to be careful with such meaning, which should be obvious from the context, unless you are a retard) since you assume that someone is a racist with no basis for it other than that you wish it were true. You don't like what I have to say so you look for a character flaw that gives you the ability to overlook common sense.

      OP stated it was fat person's fault that people called fat person fat. Since being fat is a choice (as was acknowledged by fat person), there is nothing wrong with people who are not fat that point out that fat person has chosen to be fat.

      I don't see where you find racism, but my first sentence should have pointed out that race is not a factor of anything. To quote myself, "On the other hand, no one is going to claim that personal responsibility is required for being black. That is preposterous." There is nothing racist here, and if you see anything racist, I suggest you see a psychiatrist for your mental health issues with looking racism in situations where it just does not exist. You seem to be kind of person that would go masturbate and then claim that you raped yourself because you weren't really in the mood.

      Quit looking for things that aren't there.

      I do object to people getting angry about the concept of discrimination. Just because your mother is fat doesn't mean you have to be. You don't have to have fat friends if you worry that having fat friends will make you fat. Its called discrimination, and believe it or not, discrimination is not a bad word. After all, you discriminate by not hanging out with drug addicts, or axe murderers, people who don't take showers, you get the idea.

      If you don't want society to call your fat friend fat, then change society. Move to a location in which being fat isn't a social stigma. Don't call people racist over it, because you will just be wrong.

    30. Re:Prior art: Nintendo Wii Fit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The grotesquely obese (of which i am a member) are such by choice.

      Sorry, no. Having witnessed the severe weight gain of a family member who has a serious hormonal imbalance and who eats less than many people of normal weight, I have to disagree with you. Having witnessed a number of people religiously follow diet and exercise routines, only to feel disappointed in themselves when they reach a plateau and are no longer losing weight but are still pounds and pounds above their goal weight, I have to disagree with you.

      Also, if you think that only the "grotesquely obese" get abuse about their weight, you're wrong. The truth is, when one is even moderately overweight or borderline obese, a whole lot of people seem to somehow feel that they know all they need to about one's eating habits, medical history, personal sense of self-worth, moral failings and willpower. This is especially so (in certain cultures in particular) if one is female.

      There's a lot of shaming that goes on (particularly directed towards women) for what society seems to view as a failure to maintain or a refusal to commit to keeping a societally acceptable figure. (That sounds so 1950's, but it's true.)

      I was fat in high school when I was exercising four hours a day and eating *maybe* one full meal a day, and I'm still fat now. I'm not a victim because I no longer buy into the idea that I should be ashamed of my size or my body. Frankly, if people have a problem with the way I look, that is their sickness, not mine. It's not my responsibility to starve myself or overwork my body to please them.

    31. Re:Prior art: Nintendo Wii Fit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hahaha you're fat

    32. Re:Prior art: Nintendo Wii Fit by LordLucless · · Score: 1

      Except that you'd be wrong. If she was miserable because couldn't her backside into a standard chair, or because she couldn't walk more than a couple of steps without getting out of breath, or because she had to have reconstructive surgery on her knees due to excessive weight, these are all due to her weight.

      Copping abuse from other people due to her weight is entirely due to the presence of assholes in society, and nothing to do with weight at all.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    33. Re:Prior art: Nintendo Wii Fit by altern1ty · · Score: 1

      I'll say one thing: I'm obese, and if someone came up to me on the street and heckled me about it, they'd be visiting the emergency room shortly thereafter to have their head removed from their posterior. people being a**holes may be a fact of life, but so are the potential consequences. You heckle a fat guy, you'd better be sure that's all fat under there.

    34. Re:Prior art: Nintendo Wii Fit by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1

      To illustrate this, your reasoning would also say that it is the fault of someone for being black if they receive insults about being black, the fault of someone for being Christian if they receive insults about being Christian, the fault of someone for choosing to be a computer programmer if they are laughed at by non-computer programmers.

      You lost me on that last one.

      The poster I was replying to said that it was her fault if someone mocked her or treated her badly because of an attribute of herself. I responded by showing other cases where someone could abuse you because of an attribute, intended to illustrate that (assuming you didn't approve of these other cases), the principle of abusing someone and saying its their fault is a bad one. Considering that these two posters are so vocal on the subject of choice and personal responsibility, its ironic how insistent they are that if someone insults another person about their weight, it's the fault of the person being insulted.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    35. Re:Prior art: Nintendo Wii Fit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or one could say her life was made miserable because of her weight. The grotesquely obese (of which i am a member) are such by choice. There may be genetic traits that can lead one to being overweight, but so what. There are also genetic traits that make certain people's breath smell like death, or make people gravitate toward alcoholism. We are not animals. We are not slaves to every wisp of DNA-inspired urge or weakness. I, for one, am still fat because I have not yet chosen to make the lifestyle changes needed to lose weight. I am not a victim.

      I have a lot of respect for you after reading that post.

      Thank you for not sucking :]

    36. Re:Prior art: Nintendo Wii Fit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then let's pick something that likely has a genetic predisposition and involves a conscious lifestyle decision to display to others: homosexuality. So, you think gay-bashing is fine because someone chose to express their love for someone else of the same sex instead of living celibate? As long as it's not against the law to harass them, I guess? After all, they chose to act like a faggot, right?

      Judging or harassing someone for a superficial superficial is bigotry regardless if there's a choice, if such harassment is against the law, or any other bullshit argument you can dredge up. Intolerance is abhorrent in any form, and trying to justify it is doubly so.

    37. Re:Prior art: Nintendo Wii Fit by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1

      I'm quite certain that I am correct. I'm also certain that your parents raised you improperly, you retard

      Yeah, straight to personal insults about my family and name calling in the first line. That really supports a reasoned argument. *roll eyes*

      since you assume that someone is a racist with no basis for it other than that you wish it were true. You don't like what I have to say so you look for a character flaw that gives you the ability to overlook common sense.

      Accusations of ad hominem from someone who opens both posts with insults? I didn't go looking for character flaws to invalidate your argument. Your argument itself was racist. Your argument was (and apparently still is), that it's okay to insult people because 'they choose to be fat' but its not okay to insult people for being black because 'they have no choice'. Any reasonable person would say its not okay to insult people for being black because there is nothing wrong with being black. But the sole basis of your argument is that insulting people about weight and insulting people about race (both attributes of a person's body) is that the former 'is a choice' therefore its okay. It is the inevitable flip-side of that argument that were it possible to choose a race, it would then be acceptable to insult people for being of a particular race. And that's a racist argument because it requires that one thinks there is a basis for insulting people based on race. Do you follow this reasoning? I'm sure most do, but this is the second time it has been explained to you. Start at the beginning of this paragraph and follow it through and see if you can find any part that does not follow on logically from the former. What I am saying is obviously not me "going looking for character flaws". I've written out a reasoned deduction based on exactly what you're saying. Your sole argument is that its okay to insult people about their weight because they may have some control over it unlike race, so were skin colour a choice, discrimination against colours that 'society' didn't like would similarly be okay. It can't be made any simpler than that. Either you understand where you have fallen prey to racism or you, for a second time, ignore the evidence and say its just a personal attack. It isn't - it's a direct analysis of your argument.

      OP stated it was fat person's fault that people called fat person fat. Since being fat is a choice (as was acknowledged by fat person), there is nothing wrong with people who are not fat that point out that fat person has chosen to be fat.

      Do you have any conception of the thread of this conversation, or are you just using it as a launching pad for making statements that don't quite connect. The original post of mine that has launched all your comments about my being "a retard" and "being raised improperly" was that I didn't like people finding it acceptable to come up and insult someone I cared about because she was overweight and I extended that to anyone else who was in a similar situation. Your rebuttal to that is "there is nothing wrong with pointing out someone has chosen to be fat." Now how the Hell do those two things connect? You're shifting ground like a landslide here. And you keep coming back to the issue of "choice". Even if it is allowed that being overweight is a choice, you think its okay to walk up to someone and shout abuse at them because of their lifestyle choices? Perhaps instead of race, I should have picked sexuality to make it clearer to you. Just as with body type, people are biologically disposed to prefer one gender over another. But whether they act upon that biological instinct is a choice, so by your logic it is okay to abuse and discriminate against people because of which gender they have sex with, because it is a choice that you have judged wrong. Are you not getting this? You want to judge someone for being overweight and you say this is acceptable because it is a ch

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    38. Re:Prior art: Nintendo Wii Fit by kramerd · · Score: 1

      Hurray, you are mentally retarded. Your mother may love you, but the rest of us realize that you are illiterate and proud of it. Fuck off. At this point, I just feel sorry for your.

    39. Re:Prior art: Nintendo Wii Fit by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1

      :D

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    40. Re:Prior art: Nintendo Wii Fit by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1


      I want to do you a favour. You seem like a well-intentioned and friendly sort. Now clearly you see being overweight as a negative as you are arguing people are not wrong for insulting the overweight (my original point where you said the blame wasn't theirs). You also said that people are not slaves to a whisp of DNA. So I put the two together and ask you to lose weight and become slim this year. Either you will achieve this and reach a state you think is more desirable, or you will fail and concede the powerful effect of your circumstances and your genetics on your weight, both gaining self-insight and becoming less mistakenly judgemental. It's a win-win either way and all you have to do is post a reply to this saying "yes." I'll even be your training buddy as I could lose a few pounds myself. What do you say? Is my logic sound? I hope you will accept.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    41. Re:Prior art: Nintendo Wii Fit by Joey+Vegetables · · Score: 1

      People can go from thin to morbidly obese in very little time due to things like known, documented side effects of certain psychiatric drugs (mostly antipsychotics, also some alleged treatments for ADHD and depression) that frack up the liver. (You are supposed to have monthly liver function monitoring when on those drugs, but that rarely happens, and without it, you can suffer permanent damage to liver, pancreas, and kidneys.) Obesity can result from other problems that affect these organs, as can diabetes, hypertension and the other aspects of "metabolic syndrome." In some cases it is a cause, in others an effect. It is not possible to generalize without knowing a person's medical history. There appears to be a large correlation between certain additives like HFCS and obesity even when other factors are held constant, and some good reasons to believe this is a causative relationship (for instance the tendency of fructose metabolism to take place in the liver rather than throughout the entire body, and to not produce proper levels of leptin to regulate subsequent hunger). It is simply more complex then "fat people lack self-control." Even if that were true we do not have sufficient data to conclude that the poor self-control led to the obesity, rather than perhaps the other way around. And, finally, there is the idea that people are people, and are entitled to a certain amount of respect and dignity regardless of whether we agree with the choices they make (even presuming that their obesity is a choice).

    42. Re:Prior art: Nintendo Wii Fit by brkello · · Score: 1

      Actually, we can make fun of religions all we want and do so often. Particularly horrible religions like Scientology. Why do they get picked on? Because of the awful things they do. We do it in hopes other people not be lured in to something that stupid.

      I am not a person who would ever make fun of somebody about their weight. On the other hand, I don't really feel sorry for them. They choose to be that way and face that ridicule. It would be a lot better for them to change their lifestyle based purely on health. If obesity is viewed as acceptable, that doesn't give a person any reason to improve their life. So I think at a certain level, it should be looked down upon.

      What you are talking about is not using logic. You have an opinion. But because you used some logic to form that opinion does not mean that others can't use logic to come up with another one. My logic is that being obese is bad for your health and has a negative impact on me since you will have more health problems and be more of a burden on the health care system driving up my insurance costs. I am not advocating cruelty. But I am not advocating allowing obesity to be viewed as something that is positive or neutral. It is bad. We all know it. People have the choice to change it.

      --
      Support a great indie game: http://www.abaddon360.com
    43. Re:Prior art: Nintendo Wii Fit by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1


      My original post said that I object to it being socially acceptable to mock people for their weight. I also said that I didn't like how my friend was made miserable because people threw abuse for her about her weight. That's pretty much the extent of what I said. I got a response telling me that she was at fault for other people coming up to her and insulting her. My logic is not an opinion, it was explaining the falsity of that statement. As both respondents were so loud on the subject of personal responsibility you'd think they'd expect responsibility for verbal abuse to lie with the person shouting it, but apparently not. I dislike all variants on "she was asking for it" which is what these two posters came up with.

      You want obesity to be looked on as unhealthy - fine. It is. But if someone came up to a good friend of yours in the street and yelled insults at her, I'm sure you'd view that behaviour as unacceptable as well. That obesity is a short-hand way of showing someone is stupid or corrupt in mainstream Hollywood movies, we can also file away as nasty, I think. I don't know, but I expect you'd agree with me on that too - "we need more laughs in this movie, lets add a fat friend." If nothing else, making people depressed and self-conscious about their weight more often leads to further weight game (eat to compensate, ashamed to go to the gym or go for a run or ask someone out) than it does to sudden slimming. If you're unhealthy because you're overweight, you know that. Mockery is not a positive motivation for most people and the people mocking certainly aren't doing it out of the goodness of their heart - they're doing it because they find it fun to pick on someone. And that attitude is something I see as destructive so I'm sure you don't object to it being discouraged either. ;)
      Regards,
      H.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
  5. ooh, fun! a patent to tattoo "undesireables." by swschrad · · Score: 4, Funny

    prior art exists, now Ballmer has to grow a stupid mustasche, chew carpets, and march on Poland.

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
  6. What next? by Khris · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    How about patenting a system to prevent people from supporting the Jonas Brothers! Now that one would make millions!!

  7. Wow by nametaken · · Score: 1

    I wouldn't piss off this fat kid... he has a power glove AND a Max controller. TURBO'S, FTW!

    1. Re:Wow by quadelirus · · Score: 1

      Is that cmdrTaco?

  8. nostaliga...... by Shakrai · · Score: 1

    Ah, the NES zapper. That thing was awesome. Is it sad that I can still burn an entire afternoon playing duck hunt when the mood strikes?

    --
    I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
    We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    1. Re:nostaliga...... by Rei · · Score: 1

      I loved controlling the duck while my little sister was shooting. ;) I'd usually hide it in the tree.

      --
      Nobody pushes buttons like our bunny. Big red buttons with labels that say "IGNITION", apparently.
    2. Re:nostaliga...... by bertoelcon · · Score: 1

      I always got bored and rigged the gun to a flashlight so you never missed. Just pull the trigger when a duck is on the screen is a hit.

      --
      Anything can be found funny, from a certain point of view.
    3. Re:nostaliga...... by e2d2 · · Score: 1

      I bet yours is shaped in the form of a bong isn't it? Admit it fokker, you're on the pot!

    4. Re:nostaliga...... by SteveFoerster · · Score: 1

      You know, that's one of those comments where context is everything....

      --
      Space game using normal deck of cards: http://BattleCards.org
    5. Re:nostaliga...... by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Wait, what?

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    6. Re:nostaliga...... by Rei · · Score: 1

      If you had a controller plugged into the second player slot, you could control control a duck. You didn't know that? :)

      --
      Nobody pushes buttons like our bunny. Big red buttons with labels that say "IGNITION", apparently.
    7. Re:nostaliga...... by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      No, I didn't. I'll have to see if I can find a ROM laying around to check that out, I could have tormented my sister so much with that!

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    8. Re:nostaliga...... by Rei · · Score: 1

      If I remember right, it only worked in 1-duck mode.

      --
      Nobody pushes buttons like our bunny. Big red buttons with labels that say "IGNITION", apparently.
  9. Cool, the corporate nanny state. by johnny+cashed · · Score: 1

    Big government wasn't enough, now the corporations step in.

    1. Re:Cool, the corporate nanny state. by Improv · · Score: 1

      Culture has always done this. It's part of being human.

      --
      For every problem, there is at least one solution that is simple, neat, and wrong.
    2. Re:Cool, the corporate nanny state. by Icegryphon · · Score: 1

      yeah because some people in "Culture" don't know how to mind their own damn business and worry about themselves.
      Seriously I hate people who tell people how to live their lives.
      Do these people have all the problems in their lives solved to the point where they feel the need to lecture others?
      Do they have all their bills paid? Perfect Driving Record? Perfect Health? Perfect Everything?
      Live and let live, let sleeping dogs lie, etc, etc, etc

    3. Re:Cool, the corporate nanny state. by Zencyde · · Score: 5, Funny

      Stop telling me how to live my life! If I want to tell others how to live their lives, that's MY choice.

      --
      What day is it? Could you please tell me?
    4. Re:Cool, the corporate nanny state. by Icegryphon · · Score: 1

      Stop telling me how to live my life! If I want to tell others how to live their lives, that's MY choice.

      FALCON PUNCH!!!!

    5. Re:Cool, the corporate nanny state. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do realize that government and corporations have been virtually indistinguishable, and inseparable since the beginning of human existance, right?

    6. Re:Cool, the corporate nanny state. by mea37 · · Score: 1

      Sounds good to me.

      So if your decisions lead to health problems, you'll be waving off any government and/or insurance-based aid related to the resulting medical bills, right? Live and let live, etc, etc, etc.

      You're part of a society. Get over it.

    7. Re:Cool, the corporate nanny state. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Corporations own the government...so......

    8. Re:Cool, the corporate nanny state. by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 1

      People will think what they will about other people, and make decisions about their own lives accordingly. You can't expect people not to judge each other. You can be selective about what judgments you take seriously, and whose judgments are more meaningful to you.

      To be so sensitive to being judged suggests a resentment based on a personal sense of failure. When you get over the resentment, judgment is just regular social interaction.

      This isn't "lecturing", either. This is about a tool that would let people get feedback about their own progress in areas of their lives. Other forms of judgment seldom address the object of judgment directly - usually, it's either communicated as gossip, or as the creation of a set of expectations and frames.

    9. Re:Cool, the corporate nanny state. by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      As the Mahareeshi Hashish Yogi once said "People who live in glass houses shouldn't throw orgies".

      Personally, I have no issue with people who want to tell others what to do. I can tune them out, call them names, etc. No problem.
      Also, some people like being told what to do. Its a lot easier to tell who those people are when you are in places where its acceptable to make them wear collars and leashes. (Usually also not done in glass houses)

      Its the people who want to tell people what to do, and think that its ok to raise a force of thugs with guns to enforce their opinion as to what people should do. Those people I have some fundamental problems with.

      -Steve

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    10. Re:Cool, the corporate nanny state. by hansamurai · · Score: 1

      At least I have the option to not give Microsoft any money if I don't agree with their practices.

    11. Re:Cool, the corporate nanny state. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what an excellent justification to remove choice from life and fill the void with unnatural punishments.

    12. Re:Cool, the corporate nanny state. by Improv · · Score: 1

      Fail. People will always tell you how to live your life, and you will always have a stake in theirs. It's called living in society. No person is an island. We interact with each other, rely on each other, and have a stake in each other.

      --
      For every problem, there is at least one solution that is simple, neat, and wrong.
    13. Re:Cool, the corporate nanny state. by fafaforza · · Score: 1

      I'd generally agree with you, but there is a definite problem with obesity, and I don't know that I'd trust most of the parents out there to know how to feed their kids healthily and in right portions. We made this bed ourselves, now we have to sleep in it. Obviously educating people about carbs and proteins and calories would go a long way, but I don't know that too many people are listening.

  10. First of april? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's the date.. first of april? No.. I don't get the point of this..

  11. And presumably all this will be done.... by pandrijeczko · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...on a fantastically lean, mean & slim Microsoft Windows OS?

    --
    Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
    1. Re:And presumably all this will be done.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My guess would be that they want this for the XBox 360 to go along with Project Natal.

    2. Re:And presumably all this will be done.... by LOLLinux · · Score: 0, Troll

      Yeah, cause the Linux kernel isn't bloated or anything, right?

    3. Re:And presumably all this will be done.... by umbrellasd · · Score: 1

      Only if we also require operating systems to show a splash screen with a person as correspondingly fat as the operating system itself. Welcome to FattyOS!

    4. Re:And presumably all this will be done.... by The+Angry+Mick · · Score: 1

      Yeah, cause the Linux kernel isn't bloated or anything, right?

      I can remove Linux bloat.

      --

      I'm not tense. I'm just terribly, terribly, alert.

    5. Re:And presumably all this will be done.... by electricbern · · Score: 1

      They'll be packaging the newer versions of the Windows OS on barrels instead of boxes. All for the good of mankind.

      --
      alias possession='chmod 666 satan && ls /dev > il && tail daemon.log'
    6. Re:And presumably all this will be done.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      But it'll still be stored on a FAT filesystem . . . or maybe it'll be ex-FAT, but only after the users trim down.

    7. Re:And presumably all this will be done.... by adbge · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, cause the Linux kernel isn't bloated or anything, right?

      Funny, the OP didn't mention Linux... Cute straw-man.

    8. Re:And presumably all this will be done.... by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      Dude, did you go to “special” school? Stuff isn’t absolute. It’s relative.

      A blue whale may be a huge animal, compared to a mosquito.

      But compared to a red(mond) giant star, its mass is not even noteworthy.

      Watch Windows run on a SmartCard.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    9. Re:And presumably all this will be done.... by Synchis · · Score: 1

      I love how you managed to quote a single /. article about a single persons opinion (albiet an influencial opinion) about the Linux Kernel and have used it as evidence in a sarcastic reply to an even more sarcastic post.

      Windows *is* bloated. I believe the Windows 7 footprint when I installed it was in the range of 2-3gig, and that was *just* the OS.

      Ubuntu footprint from my latest install on a laptop: 2gig, and that was *WITH* all sorts of games, apps, web browser, etc all installed with it.

      If you stripped Linux down to what M$ gives you out of the box, the footprint would be significantly smaller.

      Oh, and I'm pretty sure you couldn't get Windows 7 to fit on a 1.44" floppy and still have it boot.

      --
      Thomas A. Knight
      Author of The Time Weaver
    10. Re:And presumably all this will be done.... by HideyoshiJP · · Score: 0

      I can remove Linux bloat.

      ...but my Windows is still ugly?

    11. Re:And presumably all this will be done.... by Arthur+Grumbine · · Score: 1

      I can remove Linux bloat.

      As you can with Windows. And it's quite a bit easier, even if with Windows it's more like going from being a 600 lb man to a 250 lb man (still a bit chunky), while with Linux you would be going from a 200 lb man (not really fat at all) to a rail-thin, barely-alive 98 lb weakling.

      --
      Now that I think about it, I'm pretty sure everything I just said is completely wrong.
    12. Re:And presumably all this will be done.... by Vexorian · · Score: 1

      bleh who's the retard who modded this old news insightful? Besides, it is not like the OP mentioned Linux... regardless, even if the Linux kernel is bloated by Linus' standards, it is by far much, much lighter than the windows one. You wouldn't run windows in an ipod... and the only think preventing the linux kernel to run on ipods nowadays is the new encrypted firmware... Even if the Linux kernel was bloated. Your average Linux distro - even ubuntu - is magnitudes less bloated than windows. Heck, I can run latest version of ubuntu just fine with 512 MB of RAM and no swap... Good luck fitting even windows 7 on that...

      --

      Copyright infringement is "piracy" in the same way DRM is "consumer rape"
    13. Re:And presumably all this will be done.... by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

      Since when does nlite remove bloat from the kernel?

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    14. Re:And presumably all this will be done.... by Ralish · · Score: 1

      What evidence do you have of the NT kernel being bloated? The NT kernel itself is very modular as it has to be. I'd argue the vast majority of bloat in Windows is strictly userland.

      Being a closed-source kernel they can't compile everything it needs to support in statically as it would be giant and impractical. Making it highly modular is essentially a pre-requisite considering their engineering requirements. Check Windows\System32\drivers to see all the kernel modules on your system. Most are probably 3rd-party, if most systems I've seen are anything to go by. The actual kernel itself is a combination of ntoskrnl.exe and hal.dll in System32, and consists purely of the base NT system services (commonly known as the Executive).

    15. Re:And presumably all this will be done.... by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

      What evidence do you have of the NT kernel being bloated?

      That's not really relevant at all. Go all the way up to the LOLLinux troll -- it specifically mentions the Linux kernel becoming bloated.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    16. Re:And presumably all this will be done.... by Tolkien · · Score: 1

      Heh. #define WIN32_LEAN_AND_MEAN :)

    17. Re:And presumably all this will be done.... by Ralish · · Score: 1

      It's entirely relevant, Arthur Grumbine pointed out you can remove bloat from Windows with tools such as nLite, and you replied by pointing out that it doesn't remove bloat from the kernel. The implication being that the NT kernel is bloated. You may be right, but you haven't presented any evidence, and I'd be interested in hearing it.

      The LOLLinux poster was sarcastically pointing out that the Linux kernel itself has been claimed to be bloated, presumably referencing Linus Torvalds. It's not really relevant to the discussion, but I'd wager he's misinterpreting what Linus Torvalds meant. I'm not sure Linus meant the kernel is bloated in the binary/memory footprint sense, but more that the source code has grown very large, probably from a proliferation of drivers (and architecture support?) that is perhaps somewhat redundant and could be better streamlined, perhaps by giving the codebase a bit of a clean-up? Yes, his comment could be interpreted as a troll, but he does have some sort of evidence on his side, even if I think he's taking it out of context. So, where's yours?

    18. Re:And presumably all this will be done.... by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

      Arthur Grumbine pointed out you can remove bloat from Windows with tools such as nLite,

      While replying to a post claiming you can remove bloat from Linux.

      Which replied to a post claiming the Linux kernel is bloated.

      So if you follow the chain of implication back up, the "you can remove bloat from Linux" post would've meant "you can remove bloat from the Linux kernel", which is true -- make menuconfig.

      Someone then replied to that with nLite, implying nLite can do the same for Windows that 'make menuconfig' does for Linux.

      I think it's entirely accurate to then ask whether nLite actually does that for the kernel, to bring us back on topic.

      The implication being that the NT kernel is bloated.

      I intended no such implication. In fact, if you are right, so am I -- if the NT kernel is completely not bloated at all, and there's no room to reasonably streamline it, then nLite certainly doesn't remove any bloat from the kernel, since there was none there to remove.

      I'm sure it looks like I'm trying to weasel-word my way out of this, but no, I don't actually know enough about the NT kernel to say much either way -- I'm merely pointing out that as far as I know, nLite doesn't touch it.

      I'd wager he's misinterpreting what Linus Torvalds meant. I'm not sure Linus meant the kernel is bloated in the binary/memory footprint sense, but more that the source code has grown very large,

      I suspect it was vaguer than that. It is true in both senses, though. It's getting more and more difficult to fit any sort of kernel on a floppy, whereas it used to be reasonable to fit an entire kernel for your system on a floppy, and theoretically possible to fit an entire Linux system on a floppy. And the kernel source itself is getting larger and larger, because as long as it's a monolithic kernel, it is easier to have something maintained with the kernel than outside of it.

      What I suspect happened is that until my comment, people were interpreting the "Linux is bloated" to mean the entire OS is bloated. This is also true, and it's also true that you can strip away Linux bloat by choosing a different distro, and the result can be much smaller than the result of nLite on a recent Windows -- all of these were valid points. But I wanted to bring it back to the fact that the original "Linux is bloated" comment wasn't talking about the distro, it was talking about the kernel, and the poster even said so.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    19. Re:And presumably all this will be done.... by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      Good call. We also need OS-based discrimination. For example the economy could work like this:

      If you run the game on Windows, all items in the game will be twice as expensive and you will have access to exclusive antivirus items that keep your other items from randomly breaking (while lowering all your stats).
      If you run it on Linux, you won't be able to use the in-game currency at all.
      If you run it on Mac OS you can't buy anything but the most expensive item of every kind.
      If you run it on an iPhone, everytime you try to put something on the market, it will take three months to be processed and may or may not be rejected.

      Brillant!

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    20. Re:And presumably all this will be done.... by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Yea, because Linux and Ubuntu are both the same word.

      Linux is not bloated. Some distros may be, but that doesn't mean shit.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    21. Re:And presumably all this will be done.... by Samah · · Score: 1

      Heh. #define WIN32_LEAN_AND_MEAN :)

      Damn it, you beat me to it!!! :(

      --
      Homonyms are fun!
      You're driving your car, but they're riding their bikes there.
  12. Remember the old joke? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where the guy tries to order pizza, but the pizza shop checks his health records... then denies him the pizza?? Sounds like it's becoming true!!!

  13. Brilliant by tsotha · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Brilliant idea. Take people who don't measure up to everyone's expectations, and heap shame on them in the one place where they can take a break from it all. Microsoft should also file for a patent on a method to lose money.

    1. Re:Brilliant by Shakrai · · Score: 4, Funny

      Microsoft should also file for a patent on a method to lose money.

      Windows Vista hasn't been patented yet?

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    2. Re:Brilliant by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 3, Insightful

      MS isn't losing money on Vista. They are just charging for Vista SP3, AKA Windows 7.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    3. Re:Brilliant by porkThreeWays · · Score: 1

      I don't think a lot of kids are outsiders because of video games, I think a lot of outsiders turn to video games for comfort and to get away from the world. If you shame them in their one place to escape, they'll turn to another place to escape such as reading sci-fi.

      --
      If an officer ever threatens to taze you, say you have a pacemaker.
    4. Re:Brilliant by icebraining · · Score: 1

      I think as Slashdot readers, we are well aware of that.

    5. Re:Brilliant by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      I don't want protection from anything other than invasion and crime, thank you very much.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    6. Re:Brilliant by Arthur+Grumbine · · Score: 1

      They couldn't patent Vista - they themselves already had the prior art.

      --
      Now that I think about it, I'm pretty sure everything I just said is completely wrong.
    7. Re:Brilliant by quadelirus · · Score: 1

      Do you really think that this is what its about? MS isn't stupid. They are out to make money and they aren't looking to heap shame on their users. They will probably end up marketing it as "your xbox the accountability partner" which will create rewards for meeting exercise goals. It seems a mountain is being made out of this molehill.

    8. Re:Brilliant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice one. That's his point.

    9. Re:Brilliant by tsotha · · Score: 1

      I wasn't talking about kids as a group. I was talking about fat people.

    10. Re:Brilliant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am sure no money was lost... A small percentage of customers maybe, but over all it is likely there was a profit with Vista.

    11. Re:Brilliant by WinterSolstice · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I think DEC has that patent already... so I guess HP owns it now :D

      "Patent for a method of developing innovations that result in bankruptcy"

      --
      An operating system should be like a light switch... simple, effective, easy to use, and designed for everyone.
    12. Re:Brilliant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It has been patented. How to make loads of cash on crappy software.

    13. Re:Brilliant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you blame them?

      Despite its flaws, Vista is not nearly as terrible as we (the Internet peanut gallery) made it out to be. After all that FUD, they had little choice but to re-brand.

    14. Re:Brilliant by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      MS isn't losing money on Vista. They are just charging for Vista SP3, AKA Windows 7.

      This is so true! They must have been jealous of Apple.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  14. HA! by cortesoft · · Score: 3, Funny

    Ha! I have been shaming and banning fat people for years now. Where is my patent?

    1. Re:HA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Ha! I have been shaming and banning fat people for years now. Where is my patent?

      Prior Art, you should sue Microsoft...

    2. Re:HA! by jennyfever · · Score: 1

      Get into the games business and you could get paid, apparently.

  15. Scary by Sumbius · · Score: 1

    So soon, if this trend keeps gaining wind under its wings, WoW will be flooded with millions of fatass female elfs and midgets... Well, they get whats coming to them.

  16. You think this doesn't effect you by Locke2005 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Does this mean I won't be able to play as a 36-24-26 blonde woman anymore? If Microsoft starts actually checking players appearance and gender, I predict there will be absolutely no "hot chick" avatars in the Microsoft MMORPGs! Is this "sausage fest" environment really the result they are looking for?

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    1. Re:You think this doesn't effect you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In a word? Uh, "no" LOL

    2. Re:You think this doesn't effect you by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 1

      But that's my favourite past time!

      ASL? ;) 18/f/So-Cal!

    3. Re:You think this doesn't effect you by clone53421 · · Score: 4, Funny

      If Microsoft starts actually checking players appearance and gender

      It’s okay... you can fool it with a picture of a vagina.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    4. Re:You think this doesn't effect you by mister_playboy · · Score: 1

      Did you mean 36-24-36? 26 isn't gonna look very good or give you much room to work in ...

      --
      Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law ::: Love is the law, love under will
    5. Re:You think this doesn't effect you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      24-26? you like your women to look like a guy with a boob job?

    6. Re:You think this doesn't effect you by mea37 · · Score: 1

      Just because they're patenting something, doesn't mean they're going to apply it universally. Nor, if you read what they're talking about, is it necessarily about making the avatar match all of the player's real-life characteristics.

      Really the point of this is to allow for games that take, as part of their input, characteristics like the player's weight. In other words, real-world activities and their impact on your body become part of playing the game.

      Good? Bad? Like most ideas, it depends on what they do with it.

      OTOH, I'm not even going to start trying to figure out what, if anything, related to this idea should be eligible for patent protection.

    7. Re:You think this doesn't effect you by jchoyt · · Score: 1

      ... then your avatar would be the flying spaghetti monster.

      --
      Sometimes the truth is arrived at by adding all the little lies together and deducting them from all that is known.
    8. Re:You think this doesn't effect you by alan_dershowitz · · Score: 1

      Where am I going to find one of those???

    9. Re:You think this doesn't effect you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      C'mon, no one wants to admit their a big pussy.

    10. Re:You think this doesn't effect you by FlyMysticalDJ · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It kind of defeats the purpose of a "Role-Playing" game. I think They should also make it so that to play as a rogue, you must have a criminal record for having stolen something, and to play a warrior you must have a record of having killed someone. Oh yeah and to be a wizard you must have a record of having broken the laws of physics.

    11. Re:You think this doesn't effect you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But where am I going to be able to find one of those on the Internet?

    12. Re:You think this doesn't effect you by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      I predict there will be absolutely no "hot chick" avatars in the Microsoft MMORPGs!

      Well of course: if the obsessive nerds find out that the hot chick in game X is actually a hot chick in real life, they'll harass her til she leaves.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    13. Re:You think this doesn't effect you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It’s okay... you can fool it with a picture of a vagina.

      Oh, that'll fool it all right...into thinking you're a Mac user.

    14. Re:You think this doesn't effect you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where the hell would I find one of those on the internet?

    15. Re:You think this doesn't effect you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I had a picture of a vagina what the hell would I be playing games for?

    16. Re:You think this doesn't effect you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

        I predict there will be absolutely no "hot chick" avatars in the Microsoft MMORPGs!

      Well except for me!

  17. Hope you have permission for that photo -- poor ki by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I hope that the photo of the overweight dressed with Nintendo garb is from someone you know, and that they gave permission for you to humiliate them in front of thousands of other people.

    Otherwise, it's cruel. He probably meant for that photo to remain private.

    The poor kid needs your encouragement, not your ridicule. Can I find some embarrassing photos of you when you were a kid and post them online?

  18. Oh Noes by ultraexactzz · · Score: 1

    So, Wii makes you swing the controller and get exercise or nags you to load up wii fit and exercise. Xbox (presumably) will now force you to exercise in order to play. Does this mean that the Playstation will become the system of the obese? I'll bet some marketing company is already working on the ads...

    --
    Never underestimate the potential of Human stupidity. -Heinlein
    1. Re:Oh Noes by electricbern · · Score: 1

      Playstation: because if you wanted to go outside and exercise you'd be outside exercising.

      --
      alias possession='chmod 666 satan && ls /dev > il && tail daemon.log'
  19. Patent Office by Maximum+Prophet · · Score: 1

    I'm glad the patent office is spending time on this rather that working on useless things like new life saving drugs...

    --
    All ideas^H^H^H^H^Hprocesses in this post are Patent Pending. (as well as the process of patenting all postings)
    1. Re:Patent Office by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      The patent office doesn't invent any new drugs. That's like saying the post office is wasting its time on Cosmopolitan.

    2. Re:Patent Office by Nadaka · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Thats right. Nothing says progress like granting a extortionate monopoly on a drug that could save millions, if only they could afford it.

    3. Re:Patent Office by Amouth · · Score: 1

      you can't Patent a drug - only the process to manufacture it (which has to be FDA approved too).

      the reason you wait for generic drugs is that even after a drug has passed the FDA if you where to make it using a different process then you would still have to go through FDA approval for it - might as well come up with something different.

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    4. Re:Patent Office by Maximum+Prophet · · Score: 1

      The Post Office gets paid to deliver Cosmo, enough to hire additional personal. Junk mail is a net profit for the PO. (unlike regular mail) Your letter to aunt Jane is in effect subsidized by "useless" mail.

      With the Patent Office, like most government agencies, any money taken in goes to the general pool. They can't use the extra money from frivolous patent applications to hire more/better examiners.

      So yes, every frivolous patent takes resources away from the important work.

      --
      All ideas^H^H^H^H^Hprocesses in this post are Patent Pending. (as well as the process of patenting all postings)
    5. Re:Patent Office by FooAtWFU · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Nope. We just assume that taking away the multimillion-dollar monopoly incentive won't have any effect on pharmaceutical developments and the drugs available (outside of patents) for your children's generation, or even your generation when you retire in 40 years. No effect whatsoever.

      I mean, come on, dude, is a little bit of a balanced perspective on a nuanced issue too much to ask?

      --
      The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
    6. Re:Patent Office by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      Thats right. Nothing says progress like granting a extortionate monopoly on a drug that could save millions, if only they could afford it.

      Their protection time is 17 years + time spent waiting on a decision. I'd rather all medicine got approved 16.9 years before it was submitted.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    7. Re:Patent Office by jthill · · Score: 1

      Yeah. If we don't pay off the rich people handsomely enough they won't pitch in to help save lives.

      All the free-market advocates silently ignore one simple fact: if the seller is forced to sell and the buyers are not forced to buy, it's not a free market.

      --
      As always, all IMO. Insert "I think" everywhere grammatically possible.
    8. Re:Patent Office by Kattspya · · Score: 1

      Exactly how much research into the subject have you done to achieve a little bit of a balanced perspective?

      I'm guessing none because the only studies I've seen have pointed in the direction that medical patents do not encourage innovation or even a strong industry. Also, you're assuming that competition is a lesser motivator than profits.

      Here's one: http://www.dklevine.com/general/intellectual/againstnew.htm

  20. So they want discrimatory features into games... by Yaa+101 · · Score: 1

    ...How appalling

  21. This won't work by wizardforce · · Score: 1

    A game would have to be pretty compelling otherwise to make the risk of being banned for poor health do anything other than dissuade larger gamers from playing all together.

    Linking one's gaming avatar to one's physique, explains Microsoft, will produce healthy and virtuous behaviors in individuals.

    Most likely it will reduce the number of people playing any game with this technology in favor of competitor's games and as such is pretty much doomed to fail.

    --
    Sigs are too short to say anything truly profound so read the above post instead.
    1. Re:This won't work by Z1NG · · Score: 1

      I think people who choose to play this kind of game would do so because of the limitation. Clearly the market for such a product would be smaller, but I don't think that it would be nonexistent. I personally believe that the avatar part of the patent is nothing more than a novelty, but being able to earn health or fitness credits is a pretty good idea.

  22. From TFA: by jockeys · · Score: 5, Informative

    "The physiological data can be gleaned from a third party health data collection repository"

    As someone who worked in the healthcare industry for a number of years, this seems like a HIPAA violation lawsuit waiting to happen.

    --

    In Soviet Russia jokes are formulaic and decidedly non-humorous.
    1. Re:From TFA: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Never mind HIPAA - imagine the first time it locks out someone who is handicapped and can't do what MS demands to get the avatar they want...

    2. Re:From TFA: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This seems like an ADA lawsuit waiting to happen.

      What about people who are, for various health conditions or due to accidents, cannot maintain what Microsoft would consider a "healthy" weight?

      Not to mention all of those "transgendered" folks who will be in an uproar when they cannot play as a female, even though they identify themselves as female, etc... just because their "plumbing" is "wrong"?

      And, finally, what about all of those FBI agents? There will either be an exception for them or suddenly there will no longer be any 14-year-old girls on the Internet.

    3. Re:From TFA: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As someone who understands the difference between a Covered Entity under HIPPA and how often the Privacy rule is upheld when a complaint is filed, this seems like a whole lot of nothing for either group to ever worry about.

    4. Re:From TFA: by natehoy · · Score: 1

      I suspect preemptive HIPAA lawsuits will be filed about 1 femtosecond after this patent gets approved, years before any such product could go to market.

      I can't see any benefit to a device like this, unless someone is trying to make a "virtual gym" or something, in which case I'll join a real gym. That way no one has access to my medical records. As a bonus, if I overdo it and go to code blue or something, there are actual people around to call an ambulance and administer first aid.

      Unless they have plans to integrate a defib into the game controller.

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    5. Re:From TFA: by khallow · · Score: 1

      As someone who worked in the healthcare industry for a number of years, this seems like a HIPAA violation lawsuit waiting to happen.

      The US isn't the only place that Microsoft does business. China, for example, has shown an interest in nannying its gamers. With some drift in a bad direction, some parts of the developed world including the US could be doing this sort of thing as well. Remember, it's not an HIPAA violation, if your application is excluded from the regulation by Congress.

    6. Re:From TFA: by jockeys · · Score: 1

      depressing, but salient.

      --

      In Soviet Russia jokes are formulaic and decidedly non-humorous.
    7. Re:From TFA: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They dont mean to get your medical records, just find out how often you order domino's to your house.

    8. Re:From TFA: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The physiological data can be gleaned from a third party health data collection repository"

      As someone who worked in the healthcare industry for a number of years, this seems like a HIPAA violation lawsuit waiting to happen.

      No it's not, the third party health data collector is probably part of something called project Natal ;)

  23. WTF??? by gstoddart · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Microsoft also proposes shaping gaming experiences by using 'psychological and demographic information such as education level, geographic location, age, sex, intelligence quotient, socioeconomic class, occupation, marital/relationship status, religious belief, political affiliation, etc.'

    Where, exactly, does Microsoft think it's going to get this stuff from? The summary actually makes reference to health records.

    Heck, I'm not sure most government agencies should have access to most of that information. Microsoft sure as fsck has no business with it.

    Welcome to the dystopian future, fat boy. This is actually kind of scary.

    Cheers

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    1. Re:WTF??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sigh... from the user probably? You know for something like a fitness game... those things that have really exploded onto the scene with the Wii. But nah... I'm sure it's far more likely this is for governments to track fat people, so that there is a high calorie food supply for the political and economic elite in times of crisis.

    2. Re:WTF??? by Amouth · · Score: 1

      well one thing i could see them pushing this patent onto would be the use of VR for post rehab counculing.

      http://www.cnn.com/2008/TECH/07/16/db.secondlifetherapy/index.html

      the rehab unit would have access to the health records and we can assume consent (in the fine print) to do this as a way of keeping people straight and not delusional.

      It sounds stupid - but so does Avatars in rehab - or Dances with Smurfs.

      But this isn't completely point less as if tweeter and Facebook hasn't taught us already too many people will take what ever is thrown at them

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    3. Re:WTF??? by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 1

      They Will Ask. And I will tell. Want to play CoD: MW3? Give me your Age for ratings verification.
      Want to use Project Natal? Tell us your height and weight to help get more accurate rendering.

    4. Re:WTF??? by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      Sigh... from the user probably? You know for something like a fitness game

      Given that the patent says "A method of interacting with a virtual environment, comprising:accessing a physical characteristic nonvolitionally obtained from a user", and makes reference to a "health information smart card", I disagree.

      The information they're describing goes well beyond that I'd ever provide to any game. This really does sound like some creepy sort of "fat kid rehab center" where you no longer really have a choice in the matter.

      I'm also fairly sure that in most locations, you wouldn't really be legally allowed to use someone's health information like this.

      But nah... I'm sure it's far more likely this is for governments to track fat people, so that there is a high calorie food supply for the political and economic elite in times of crisis.

      *laugh* Now that, I might believe.

      Cheers

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    5. Re:WTF??? by Conchobair · · Score: 1

      From your mom. Or other parent or guardian that wants to control how much thier fat kid plays video games.

    6. Re:WTF??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Windows Live and X-Box live are private, they dont have to allow access, there are ways(though dubious) they could require health records. For instance they are using them to limit game play time so as to not be sued for people becoming obese for playing their consoles and or games.

      Even though Microsoft has distributed large amounts of idiocy in the past I doubt they would really go as far as banning persons, more like limiting play time.

    7. Re:WTF??? by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      No, you don’t understand. They expect you to enter it into the registration form.

      But I am happy that you did not even consider this possibility, because it was just way out of the imaginable, and therefore did not understand.
      That shows a healthy, unmarred brain. :)

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    8. Re:WTF??? by straponego · · Score: 1

      Health records? Man, MS employee fatatars (or avatards, whatever these lovely things will be called), will have a lot of stabholes...

    9. Re:WTF??? by radtea · · Score: 1

      Where, exactly, does Microsoft think it's going to get this stuff from? The summary actually makes reference to health records.

      What stuff, and for what purpose? The only thing you can tell by reading the summary is that MS has filed a patent application for something. That something has a marginally-different-from-zero chance of being something to do with games and health, but you have to understand how /. patent stories are generated:

      1) Find out about a patent application from an organization we all love to hate
      2) Read the patent title and abstract
      3) Publish a summary that badly distorts the information in the title and abstract
      4) ???
      5) Profit!!!

      I'm pretty sure the "???" in step 4 relates to getting lots of pageviews from /. readers who, despite having seen exactly the same process happen again and again and again, and having had explained to them repeatedly that the only thing that matters in a patent is the claims, not the title or abstract--much less the summary that has been spat out by the /. editors--still insist on reading the summary and responding as if it had something to do with the American patent system, which the /. editors love. We know they love it because they never attack it, and find it necessary to make stuff up about it for people to take offense at, because they think that if they told the truth about it everyone else would love it as much as they do (they'd be wrong about that, but that is clearly what they believe.)

      The curious thing is: why do the /. editors love the American patent system so much?
       

      --
      Blasphemy is a human right. Blasphemophobia kills.
    10. Re:WTF??? by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      In that case, I'm 5'11", 185 - the picture of health.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    11. Re:WTF??? by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      That is a BMI of 25.8, just above the low end of “Overweight”. “Normal” is 18.5–24.9.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    12. Re:WTF??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Wii Fit just weighs you and shapes your avatar accordingly.

      Still, some of the other ideas sound like they could be amusing. How would the game vary by religion for example? Would my character be attacked by a 10 headed monster while yours is attacked by someone with horns and tail?

    13. Re:WTF??? by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      And BMI is utter crap. A body fat index around 12-12% and good cardio ability is a way better measure of health. I happen to be muscular.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    14. Re:WTF??? by brkello · · Score: 1

      Well, where else? The obvious way that everyone seems to be missing is by using Natal to scan your body in and use that for the avatar.

      --
      Support a great indie game: http://www.abaddon360.com
  24. The point of gaming by vldragon · · Score: 1

    I though one of the main point of gaming was to take you out of reality and become someone or something differant. I doubt this would ever be used in game, and if is i don't think it will sell very well. Maybe they just wan't to patent it to keep other from doing it? I don't the employess of MS are any more fit than your average gamer anyway...

    --
    Eating the brains of your enemies does not make you smarter. But it's still fun.
  25. New CEO? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This patent business seems an overly complicated way to get rid of Steve Ballmer.

  26. Brain-dead by girlintraining · · Score: 1

    The precise point of video games is to be some other than yourself for awhile. If they start restricting people based on their physical appearance, how long until we start using other biometric data? The major appeal of video games is shattered when we lose that... who wants to play a video game as themselves?

    --
    #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    1. Re:Brain-dead by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't mind playing GTA as someone that vaguely matched me. As you said, its about getting away. I don't try to get away from being myself physically. I try to get away from the real world long enough that I can take my days frustration out on something virtual than something real.

      Of course, it'd be a lot harder to be a bad ass in a game if they modeled it like the skinny old no stamina no wolverine health regenerating me, but thats another story.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
  27. Ulterior motives? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does anyone see any ulterior motives in trying to be some sort of a competition for the wii? Wonder if they're thinking about limiting time for movies watched on the Xbox, etc...

  28. What part of "game" do they not understand? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Somebody doesn't get it.

  29. Re:Hope you have permission for that photo -- poor by Kral_Blbec · · Score: 1

    well, you may, but you probably can't

  30. Exercise stimulates endorphins by Akido37 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So I want to play games, so I have to exercise. Exercise releases chemicals causing pleasure in my brain.

    Eventually, I enjoy the exercise more than video games. I stop buying new games, and EA/Microsoft/Sony/Nintendo go out of business, and thousands of people lose their jobs.

    Thanks a LOT, Microsoft!!

    1. Re:Exercise stimulates endorphins by FlyMysticalDJ · · Score: 1

      On the bright side, the exercise business takes off, and thousands of people gain new jobs in 24 hour gyms to cater to all those late night ex-gamers.

    2. Re:Exercise stimulates endorphins by BigSlowTarget · · Score: 1

      Dude, your name is Akido37 of course exercise stimulates endorphins in your brain. I'm named BigSlowTarget, exercise stimulates pain in my ass.

      Even when I was young and fit exercise and pleasure never went together - people are wired in different ways.

    3. Re:Exercise stimulates endorphins by Acer500 · · Score: 1

      Even when I was young and fit exercise and pleasure never went together - people are wired in different ways.

      I don't find pleasure in exercise either, but I wonder if that pleasure could be learned/acquired.

      --
      There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics.
  31. Pot, kettle, black. by PPH · · Score: 4, Funny

    I drive through the Microsoft's campus almost daily. One of the funniest things I've seen (I have a rather twisted sense of humor) is all the Microsoft employees trying to waddle across the too short and too frequent pedestrian crosswalk signals that Redmond configured.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
    1. Re:Pot, kettle, black. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      They don't actually want to make games like this, they just want to patent it so no one else can do it to them.

    2. Re:Pot, kettle, black. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I've lived in Redmond a while now. One thing is for sure: the pedestrian crosswalk signals are NOT too short.

      They are fantastically, annoyingly long. A person in physiotherapy could make her leisurely way across the street, realize she dropped something on the other side, stumble back, get it, and cross one last time, and the hand still won't be showing.

      I remember living in downtown Toronto, on Dundas street, and running as fast as I could at the instant the white "start walking" dude appeared the flashing orange hand would still arrive before I got to the other side. There's an island in the middle of the street specifically to account for people only being able to cross half the street. Rather than just making the lights longer. Because we LIKE our traffic lights taking 1/5 the time as Redmond / Seattle lights.

    3. Re:Pot, kettle, black. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Waddle? Those weren't Microsoft employees, those were penguin infiltrators.

    4. Re:Pot, kettle, black. by PPH · · Score: 1

      The lights along 156th through the Microsoft campus are an anomoly. They are far too frequent, but in order to maintain traffic flow, they are short. It appears that the dngineering dept. have tuned the timing along that road to use pedestrian crossings as a traffic calming device.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    5. Re:Pot, kettle, black. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this sounds allot like a new game developing quick put up your patton!

  32. Interesting comments so far... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It seems all the fat kids are denouncing this as discriminatory and all the skinny kids are making fun of the fat kids.

    Sounds about like what I'd expect.

  33. Re:So they want discrimatory features into games.. by wizardforce · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Sometimes patents like this one can serve the public interest merely by reducing the likelihood of bad ideas like this one from being put into general use through fines and legal action.

    --
    Sigs are too short to say anything truly profound so read the above post instead.
  34. Double-take by HikingStick · · Score: 1

    I really had to stop for a minute and double-check the posting date. I thought that I certainly would see an April 1 designation somewhere. This is just too sad. Now we not only have nanny states, but we also will have nanny softare companies.

    Logon Process

    1. Press Ctrl+Alt+Del

    2. Enter Logon ID and password

    3. Step on the scale

    4. If weigh is a healthy value, process logon; if not, recommend a gym membership (all in the name of keeping employer-paid health insurance costs down).

    --
    I use irony whenever I can, but my shirts are still wrinkled...
  35. Re:So they want discrimatory features into games.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Better, yet, they PATENT discrimination in games...

  36. Right to Privacy by medv4380 · · Score: 1

    First this is the kind of patent that makes our patent system worthless. Patenting a Light Bulb = Good, Patenting a You're Fat Neener Neener Neener = Bad Second, they have no real capability of using their patent unless they want to violate someone personal privacy. It would be like facebook posting my weight to the world without my consent, or forbidding me from removing it when I no longer want to expose myself. Shame only works if the user can't opt out and if the users cant opt out then it's a violation of privacy without exception.

    1. Re:Right to Privacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not using the preview button = Bad Allergies to the "Enter" key = Worse Not realizing the difference between HTML and plaintext modes on a geek-oriented website = Stupid Ignoring the preview when you use it = Disgraceful Blaming it on the browser or website when everyone else besides the vocal minority can view it and use the damn preview button properly = Embarrassing

  37. NOOO by Mekkah · · Score: 2

    NO SMOKING NEAR MY XBOX 720! You will void the warranty with their built in smoke detector!

    --
    ~Mekkah
    1. Re:NOOO by Rasperin · · Score: 1

      No breathing near my xbox720 the fat detector will hear you and tell me to hit the treadmill, then void my warranty.

      --
      WTF Slashdot, why do I have to login 50 times to post?
  38. Can I ? by daveime · · Score: 2, Funny

    Can I be the first to heap scorn on the fat kid in the photo.

    You fat bastard, you fat bastard, you ate all the pie !
    (And a bucket of chicken too by the look of it).

    Why do people allow their kids to turn into such bloaters ? And don't give me any of that "oh it's genetic crap". There is no DNA strand that codes for "being a fat little piggy who Mommy overfeeds in the hope you'll amount to something more than your Father when you grow up".

    I blame Mario ... come on, he eats pizza all day and has a right paunch on him too ... what kind of a roll model is that ? (Note the deliberate misspelling of roll, thats a pune or play on words, that is). And Sonic too, I mean he was so fat, after 5 seconds of running he starting rolling head over heels.

    1. Re:Can I ? by Rasperin · · Score: 1

      And how I am supposed to address the Welsh Institute of Wood looking like a twit ? I look like somebody from Llanelli !

      Twat

      --
      WTF Slashdot, why do I have to login 50 times to post?
    2. Re:Can I ? by KarmaMB84 · · Score: 2, Informative

      high fructose corn syrup

      Suppresses sensations of fullness which would normally prevent overeating. In the United States the stuff is in EVERYTHING that would normally contain natural sugar. It has also been linked to diabetese or at least the same symptoms of diabetese.

    3. Re:Can I ? by daveime · · Score: 1

      Rasperin, I think you drank too much cheesewater at the Club Spunkin tonight. I might be forced to engaged in some Welsh Unarmed Hitting.

  39. Re:Hope you have permission for that photo -- poor by clone53421 · · Score: 1

    Why don’t you send out cease-and-desist letters to all the other websites that are using it?

    --
    Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  40. New Microsoft slogan: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We'll tell you where you want to go today, you fat bastard.

  41. Profit Margins - not so much by bruciferofbrm · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Imagine how this will work.

    Overweight people will be banned from a game if they don't 'get fit'. Those who really want to play will then 'get to it' and get in shape.

    Of course with all that exercise and new activity they are participating in will slowly bring them to realize there is something else to life then online avatar based games (with very shallow user access requirements). Slowly they will turn away from such games and begin doing things that are more active and fit in with their new health conscious life style.

    Profits in gaming start to fall off because they banned all the people who pay to play and be someone else. When they got to the point they would qualify to play the game, they no longer had the mindset to want to play the game.

    And there go my Microsoft stocks.

    1. Re:Profit Margins - not so much by icebraining · · Score: 1

      No, they will play other games, and Microsoft fat banning games will lose some market share.

    2. Re:Profit Margins - not so much by tokul · · Score: 1

      Those who really want to play will then 'get to it' and get in shape.

      Those who want to play will lie about their physical stats or will play games that don't discriminate them.

  42. Re:Hope you have permission for that photo -- poor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That pic has been circulating around the internet for YEARS, newfag.

    Anything posted to the web is fair game for public ridicule until the heat death of the Universe. If you've got a problem with that, don't post anything personal. Period.

  43. Interesting by KitsuneSoftware · · Score: 1

    This seems like a rather interesting concept. From the summary, it's probably illegal to implement due to medical privacy (and if not, it should be) but it's still interesting.

  44. Probably trying to avoid frivolous lawsuits by ravenscar · · Score: 2, Interesting

    MSFT probably realizes that they are right behind fast food chains in being targeted for law suits claiming they are liable for making people fat. By making such a feature available to say, parents for example, they may make themselves less susceptible to suit. I highly doubt MSFT is just looking to shame people.

    1. Re:Probably trying to avoid frivolous lawsuits by PaulMeigh · · Score: 1

      Mod insightful. A new form of parental control. That actually makes sense.

  45. Worst Patent application ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yours sincerely annoyed,

    Jeff Albertson

  46. Are they going to grade on a sliding scale? by gurps_npc · · Score: 1

    Because if they don't, they may not have any players at all.

    --
    excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
    1. Re:Are they going to grade on a sliding scale? by smitty777 · · Score: 1

      No pun intended...

      --
      "Before God we are all equally wise - and equally foolish"
      Albert Einstein
  47. Does it visualize cranial-rectum inversions? by meerling · · Score: 1

    What an intriguing way to wipe out virtually all computer/console gaming by your own company!
    I had never thought that anyone would patent business suicide.
    Way to go Microsoft!

    Can't wait to see Balmers avatar running around with his head stuck up his backside, that's going to be a total roflmao moment.
    I promise to take screenshots.

    1. Re:Does it visualize cranial-rectum inversions? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I highly doubt this would result in "business suicide". And honestly its rather pathetic how many people this day and age get so butt hurt about possible attacks on their appearance. Grow some balls and take it. We didn't force you to go on a cheeseburgers diet.

      Sure lots of people play games to escape their "real life". However that doesn't mean those people play them to escape their appearance. I can't ride a wolf, mow down aliens with a machine gun, or take part in WWII in real life...but I sure can in a video game. I could care less what I look like while im doing so. Not everyone games for vanity, and introducing a more personal avatar simply makes the experience more unique. If it were up to me they would also add personal stats like strength, speed, hand-eye coordination, and etc. But I'm sure that would generate whole new wave of complaints.

  48. Not a totally bad idea by pclminion · · Score: 1

    Come on people, are you dense? The idea is to create a game where success in the game is linked to personal health improvement in real life. If you don't like that sort of concept, don't play that particular game. I have no idea where you get the idea that this would be applied to all online environments.

    1. Re:Not a totally bad idea by scubamage · · Score: 1

      Agreed 100%.

    2. Re:Not a totally bad idea by benjamindees · · Score: 0, Troll

      So, in this "game", is healthcare subsidized? Is everyone taxed in order to encourage certain arbitrary health regimens over others?

      --
      "I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"
    3. Re:Not a totally bad idea by Again · · Score: 1

      You just ruined all the fun we were having making fun of Micro$ofat.

  49. Onion Headline by Slammer64 · · Score: 1

    At first I thought that this was an article from the Onion, but after reading the TFA, I'm having a hard time believing this would pass a patent exam.

  50. You want to patent something useful... by paulsnx2 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You have to insure that the fitness measurements of an individual actually belong to the individual. Haven't read their patent, but I can't see how a game can reasonably do this without some sort of biometric keys.

    And what are they going to do about people with medical conditions that might preclude exercise or normal weight? Are they really going to kick people off off the game with cancer because they have no control over their water retention?

    All in all, this is a remarkably dumb idea.

    It might be better suited for a dating site, using some mechanism to insure that the Avatar for an individual accurately represented basic physical aspects of an individual while preserving mostly their anonymity. Maybe use a Video camera plus some other hardware to scan the individual both to identify them upon logging in and updating their avatar to reflect any changes to their weight/height/BMI/hairline etc.?

    Please consider this *publishing* of this idea, and as a result *invalidating any patent* that might build off this stupid Microsoft idea.

    1. Re:You want to patent something useful... by The+Moof · · Score: 1

      Actually, as I think about this, MS just might be trying to preempt Nintendo with this patent (being the only console on the market with peripherals to detect your weight at the moment). It's not a stretch to think Nintendo might come up with a 'game' that encourages exercise, measures your progress, and updates you Mii using the balance board.

    2. Re:You want to patent something useful... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, it looks like Microsoft already patented Avatar Individualized by Physical Characteristic

    3. Re:You want to patent something useful... by Anonymous+Hermit · · Score: 1

      I think the idea is to offer a service that allows you to make gaming a reward for physical activity, and to create groups dedicated to losing their "undesirable body weight". A bit like if someone pedaled a bike to charge the battery for a console.

    4. Re:You want to patent something useful... by hallmike · · Score: 1

      They will be able to see whether it's really you by spying on you through your Project Natal Camera

    5. Re:You want to patent something useful... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What and keep fat chicks from using myspace angles on their dating profiles? How would they trick me in to a first date then?

    6. Re:You want to patent something useful... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The "stats by medical record" is pretty flawed. Again, to ignore the elephantine privacy concerns this concept raises, how does the game handle someone who is 6'1, 245 lbs and, oh yeah, 5% body fat? Is their examination of medical records thorough enough to give the person a bodybuilder's physique, rather than a kettle belly and flabby arms? What about ridiculously skinny media sponges who get out of breath from pulling their twiggy frames up a few flights of stairs? Do they come out as lithe elven ranger types capable of running over hill and dale for three days and three nights straight?

      Almost ten years ago, I was playing Everquest, and being a deceptively fit gamer nerd, I was idly thinking about something kind of like this. The conclusion I came to was that the company running the game would be best served by opening its own fitness evaluation shops in urban centers, then contracting with a chain of gyms in less populated locales to do additional testing. People could go in, pay for an examination, then go through some basic endurance, strength, and quickness tests to determine the stats of their characters. They could also take a glorified IQ test to determine their characters' "intelligence." To combat local bias (aka cheating/bribing/befriending the local gym clerk), the player could get a free 5-10% stat bonus in-game by going to one of the company-licensed stores, where presumably any employee found inputting bad data could be fired. Even if this system worked at all, I didn't think it would be a money-making concept unless the game was absolutely top-tier and planned to keep running for several years. I also thought that the game would have trouble surviving for another reason. The testing process would inevitably encourage some idiot to develop a performance-boosting drug habit or to simply run their body to death trying to get just a few more stat points for the game. The ensuing media outrage and liability suit would be crushing. Waivers of liability would sit right next to the game EULA, of course, but I'm uncertain as to whether they'd be enough to shield the game administrators from legal grief.

  51. Re:Hope you have permission for that photo -- poor by space_jake · · Score: 1

    Kid probably shouldn't have set his Facebook profile settings to Everyone.

  52. Another Really Bad MS Idea by smitty777 · · Score: 1

    They are making quite a leap by stating that by shaming someone online will motivate them to loose weight. I wonder if they can back this up from published research? This strikes me as extremely ironic, as MS is probably responsible for a great deal of the extra heft that is now plaguing our society. How many people do you know that now sit in front of a machine that is created and/or run by MS products that would have otherwise been out biking/walking/exercising in some way. Guilty conscience?
     
    Also, there are a number of different reasons a person could be overweight - perhaps they are unable to exercise? Are they going to measure MBI? Or will they just assume that anyone who xxx lb is overweight? Don't get me started - this strikes me as cut and dried discrimination.
     
    MS is doing a great job with their patents - I wonder if this will fall in to the same category as their recently slashdotted sparklines?

    --
    "Before God we are all equally wise - and equally foolish"
    Albert Einstein
  53. Discrimination by PenquinCoder · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Not only for the workplace anymore! Now standard on all MS games. If Microsoft seriously gets this 'patent' approved for the US gaming market.... how will it actually hold up against the constitution? If it's illegal to discriminate against people for the above reasons (sex, socioeconomic class, marital/relationship status, religious belief, political affiliation, etc) for things like a job, a loan, housing; then what makes it alright for MS to use those for 'shaping gaming experiences' ?

    1. Re:Discrimination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it's illegal to discriminate against people for the above reasons (sex, socioeconomic class, marital/relationship status, religious belief, political affiliation, etc) for things like a job, a loan, housing; then what makes it alright for MS to use those for 'shaping gaming experiences' ?

      Do you know what 'above' means?

      Ah, memorization, the opposite of learning.

    2. Re:Discrimination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People need housing an jobs as basic necessities for life. We don't need a game system to survive. There are other forms of entertainment out there for us to enjoy. Widespread job/housing discrimination eliminates the ability to find any job/home.

      Besides, many companies are allowed to discriminate based on gender/appearance. Try taking an overweight, 72 year old, unkempt homeless person to a photoshoot for a magazine advertisement. Gender/appearance is a basic requirement of some jobs, and therefore necessitate discrimination, which is completely legal in that context.

    3. Re:Discrimination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not like they're saying "you can't play fatty", it's just saying "hey fatty, what's up?"

    4. Re:Discrimination by Synchis · · Score: 1

      You don't *HAVE* to buy the game...

      I think the sentiment here is that if M$ brings this sort of technology on the market, they will likely "innovate" themselves right out of the market.

      Not only does this act to descriminate against users, it also singles them out and takes away one of the reasons people play these games to begin with (to escape reality). There are also heaps of privacy concerns in this, as it would almost certainly require user consent to glean data from medical records.

      I can't see this actually coming to fruition and making them any kind of money.

      Nintendo's approach was much better. Introduce the tools that people can use to get fit (physically and mentally), but don't force them to use it, and don't single them out if they don't want to.

      My suspician is that this is yet another vapourware patent that we'll never see any actual implementation of.

      --
      Thomas A. Knight
      Author of The Time Weaver
    5. Re:Discrimination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Video game access is not a constitutional right. Moreover, there is a distinction between "places of public accomodation" and private clubs. XBox Live might be considered such a club. In this case, other clubs can compete for membership, without the same restrictions.

    6. Re:Discrimination by guice · · Score: 1

      Same reason we have women's night and men are still forced to pay a price. And lets not forget this discrimination is for *PLAYING A VIDEO GAME* --- hardly on the same level as buying a house or employment. Maybe you should complaining that WoW is PC only and not console - DISCRIMINATION TO PC GAMERS! Or a guy in a wheel chair can't play arcade games ... We should start a class action lawsuit!

    7. Re:Discrimination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The constitution doesn't say that it's bad to discriminate against fat people.

      It protects people from discrimination based on factors they can't control, like which of the two major US political parties they were brainwashed into joining.

      Anyway, MS can get the weight data the same way Nintendo Wii does. Buying the equipment is consent enough for me.

  54. pear shaped blobs abound by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just hope they don't make all us heavy people look like pear shaped blobs.

      Musculature and bone structure should be taken into account. Otherwise most professional wrestlers would look like the people inn Wall-e. I know my wii fit avatar looks nothing like me since while I am overweight, but I am also muscularly fit.

  55. publish stupid patents to shame the guilty by bugi · · Score: 1

    I think the idea is to publish stupid patents to shame the idiot who filed it.

  56. This just went over my capability in digesting by unity100 · · Score: 1

    the evilness of this corporation. my evil quota is full. now, we have seen a lot of horrible moves by microsoft, but i mean this ?!?!

    they could just go all out from their seattle hq wearing postals and start kicking fat individuals in the face, saving a lot of effort and budget in the process and patent office's time.

  57. Put down the Whoopee Pie and back away slowly by AmazingChicken · · Score: 1

    Great Thanks micro$oft for making my life suck more. Oh, wait. I can't afford your game hardware anyway. You fail.

  58. Oh sure its ok for Corporations... by bjcopeland · · Score: 1

    If the government did this, it would be called "Socialism". I guess its ok for Corporations to do this sort of thing.

  59. how about by unity100 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    a strong kick in the face, to beat some sensitivity into you instead ?

    1. Re:how about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great comeback. Let me know when you've grown up a bit and can think before you speak.

      If you post personal information on the internet to a place open to the public, you're putting it there for everybody to see and reproduce as they please. You have irrevocably lost all control over that information. You can take it down, stop providing it from your end, but you cannot stop someone else from mirroring it.

      Don't like it? Tough. Don't post information you don't want everyone on the planet to see.

      Didn't know? Tough. That's your problem for using something you didn't understand. Learn the lesson and get over it.

      Very few people even know who he is; fewer give a shit. They just think it's a funny picture because guess what? Everybody does stupid shit like that.

    2. Re:how about by unity100 · · Score: 1

      let me wake you up to a fact - something being public does NOT mean that anyone is entitled to become jerks about it. just because you see an ass naked in public does NOT mean that you can go screw it.

      didnt know that ? tough. someday someone will teach it to you with a kick in the face eventually. and you really seem to be deserving it, by judging from your extremely antisocial mindset. this was what i meant.

  60. limiting much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    _In this great People's Republic of China,we seek to control games in order to keep our youth healthy mentally and physically) Oh yeah, China is definitely gonna want this for their youth

  61. Experience shaping by Kenoli · · Score: 1

    Microsoft also proposes shaping gaming experiences by using 'psychological and demographic information such as education level, geographic location, age, sex, intelligence quotient, socioeconomic class, occupation, marital/relationship status, religious belief, political affiliation, etc

    Even if they could somehow get all that information from players, what difference would it make?

    Maybe when they said "gaming experiences" what they actually meant was "ridiculous chat systems that have nothing to do with games".

  62. Fuck that by greymond · · Score: 1

    If they start with this, then whats next? If you're a smoker you can't play wii tennis?

    Besides, they'd lose too much money if fat people couldn't play video games anymore.

  63. Where did'ja... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where did'ja get my picture from? I locked my Facebook profile.

  64. Its an american problem again. by unity100 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    you and your obsessions. fat people are not discriminated against or humiliated in any way in my country. the country is turkey. and i have never yet seen any other country nearby, leave aside any european countries in which overweight people were ridiculed, belittled, bullied or discriminated against in any respect.

    i very much have the idea that you people are so obsessed with your own socioeconomical circumstances, and so many bullshit propaganda being fed into you that you fail to see a world outside yours with different ideas and inclinations exist.

    1. Re:Its an american problem again. by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      and i have never yet seen any other country nearby, leave aside any european countries in which overweight people were ridiculed, belittled, bullied or discriminated against in any respect.

      Maybe not openly, and as a matter of public policy, but it does happen.

      i very much have the idea that you people are so obsessed with your own socioeconomical circumstances, and so many bullshit propaganda being fed into you that you fail to see a world outside yours with different ideas and inclinations exist.

      I very much have the idea that you're a bit of a well-meaning naif who can only imagine the world as you've experienced it ... but that you are nonetheless wrong.

      It's nice that you have never seen discrimination, and can't imagine it. That doesn't change that it does, in fact, exist.

      I have never personally seen a platypus ... and since I've had this rock, I've not been mauled by tigers. Neither of these statements change the existence of the platypus, or the fact that there aren't tigers nearby anyway.

      Cheers

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    2. Re:Its an american problem again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1 UP!

    3. Re:Its an american problem again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fat people are not discriminated against in turkey? Then maybe Armenians, Kurds and Orthodox Christians among others should gain some weight...

    4. Re:Its an american problem again. by Ogive17 · · Score: 1

      The Japanese make fun of fat people that aren't sumo wrestlers. The Chinese make derogatory comments towards the Japanese calling them fat.

      So no, it's not just an American problem. Maybe it's you who needs to get out into the world a bit more.

      --
      "Action without philosophy is a lethal weapon; philosophy without action is worthless."
    5. Re:Its an american problem again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What makes you think that Microsoft speaks for all of the American population with their actions?
      Sounds like you're ridiculing, belittling and discriminating an entire country with an improper stereotype.

    6. Re:Its an american problem again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please go on thinking that the collective media output of a variety of organizations, many non-US based (here's looking at you, FOX), represent the actual beliefs and behaviors of the citizens of the United States. So, to recap, we use our giant balloons to send our children to steal oil from 3rd world nations since we weigh too much from stuffing our faces at our favorite "restaurant", McDonalds. When our children weigh too much to send them in the balloons, we beat them with sticks and force them to learn incorrect variants of world history. Once this phase is complete, we generally decide that what would be best is a military quagmire of sorts, which *EVERYONE* supports wholeheartedly. After a quick duck hunt with our vice president, we then put on our cowboy hats and show up at your local pub and start fights based primarily around spelling.

      If I missed anything, please include it below! But ONLY IN SHORT FACTOIDS!

    7. Re:Its an american problem again. by DrXym · · Score: 1

      What about Kurdish fat people?

    8. Re:Its an american problem again. by L3370 · · Score: 1

      Try not to let your nationalist pride get in the way with the facts.
      Fat people are not discriminated at all? I wouldn't say that's 100 percent true. I have lived in your country for a few years, and while it may not be a big issue culturally, I did see some make fun of fat people.

      Besides, your country has more important people to discriminate against. Kurds, Armenians, Gypsies.

    9. Re:Its an american problem again. by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      you and your obsessions. fat people are not discriminated against or humiliated in any way in my country. the country is turkey.

      I guess the Turkish obsession is insulting entire nations on messageboards, eh?

      and i have never yet seen any other country nearby, leave aside any european countries in which overweight people were ridiculed, belittled, bullied or discriminated against in any respect.

      They aren't in the US, either. So... what's your point?

      i very much have the idea that you people are so obsessed with your own socioeconomical circumstances,

      And "you people" are not? People in Turkey say, "I'm so happy I'm poor and unloved! I'd never obsess over this!"

      Maybe you should travel outside Turkey and find out how much like you everybody else is. Hint: A fucking LOT.

    10. Re:Its an american problem again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      thats ok. the reason you don't see any fat people is because turkey is under shreya law being a islamic country. you just kill the people you don't like or that dosen't have the same relegion as you.

    11. Re:Its an american problem again. by Sentrion · · Score: 1

      you and your obsessions. fat people are not discriminated against or humiliated in any way in my country. the country is turkey...

      Fat people are not discriminated against in a country named after a delicious fat edible bird. Oh the irony!

    12. Re:Its an american problem again. by khallow · · Score: 1

      Fun factoid: Iron-based birdshot (say obtained while on a duck hunt) is easy to remove from your body with a stereo magnet. Unless you have health insurance.

      Fun factoid: The bigger the cushion, the sweeter the pushing.

      Fun factoid: The official state religion of the U.S.A. involves many, many horses and changing the oil every 5,000 miles. You aren't going to find a funner or faster religion anywhere.

    13. Re:Its an american problem again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many obese people have you seen? What kind of proportion of your society are they? Are there any social stigmas in Turkey for obesity?

    14. Re:Its an american problem again. by altan · · Score: 1

      Though we may not discriminate against the fat quite yet, we're quite accomplished in the craft - ask the Kurds!

    15. Re:Its an american problem again. by mckinnsb · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You mean the reason why Europe has fewer fat people is because europeans don't treat the obese like fucking monsters? No way! Thats crazy talk.

      I have long believed that is the American obsession with image and sexuality that has aggravated the problem of obesity. Nearly every 'good' cure to obesity (omitting dangerous diet pills or starvation diets) involves social interaction of some kind. Lampooning people who suffer from obesity only furthers their isolation and in no way is productive towards recovery.

      I was an overweight, acne-ridden, isolated kid all through middle school - but it was the social interactions I made through multiplayer gaming on the internet (specifically, MUDS - yeah... mega dork) that gave me the confidence to approach people in real life (high school), and later lose weight with their encouragement (senior year).

      Also, isn't there a beauty to anonymity? Do we really need to see everyone's physical appearance to judge if we want to kill some mobs and grab some lootz with them? I personally would prefer not to. If I'm looking for women, I go to a supermarket, mall, or bar. On the net, my intent is otherwise focused, and I don't need to see what my digital comrade looks like to figure out if I'm having a good time playing my game. That much is usually implied.

    16. Re:Its an american problem again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      There is lots of discrimination in turkey. Some people will only eat the white meat and some will only eat the dark.

    17. Re:Its an american problem again. by kramerd · · Score: 1

      and i have never yet seen any other country nearby, leave aside any european countries in which overweight people were ridiculed, belittled, bullied or discriminated against in any respect.

      i very much have the idea that you people are so obsessed with your own socioeconomical circumstances, and so many bullshit propaganda being fed into you that you fail to see a world outside yours with different ideas and inclinations exist.

      So you have been outside of turkey then?

    18. Re:Its an american problem again. by fusiongyro · · Score: 1

      Seriously? Turkey is a secular democracy that happens to have a Muslim majority. Read up on Ataturk sometime.

    19. Re:Its an american problem again. by H0p313ss · · Score: 1

      What about Kurdish fat people?

      Or Armenians? We all know how tolerant and ethnically diverse Turkey is.

      --
      XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
    20. Re:Its an american problem again. by couchslug · · Score: 1

      Europe obviously has fewer fatties because it has a longer tradition of good food that is good for you.

      USians are marketed what is profitable for business, so we get fatburgers, sugary snacks, and feminizing soy-product endocrine disruptors.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    21. Re:Its an american problem again. by mOoZik · · Score: 1

      That may be true, but Turkey spends its time waging war on other groups, such as Armenians, Greeks, Kurds, free speech, and just about anything that goes against Islam, Atafag, or ultranationalism. What a wondeful country.

    22. Re:Its an american problem again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, we in the more enlightened UK do ridicule fat, thin, short sighted and generally different people.

      But especially the fatties.

      http://www.macclads.co.uk/hectic_house/lyrics/lyrics_alpha/fatb.html

      Also bear this in mind: the kebab shops (and therefore the majority of the fatties from the UK) are ALL YOUR FAULT!!!

    23. Re:Its an american problem again. by DrXym · · Score: 1
      I have long believed that is the American obsession with image and sexuality that has aggravated the problem of obesity. Nearly every 'good' cure to obesity (omitting dangerous diet pills or starvation diets) involves social interaction of some kind. Lampooning people who suffer from obesity only furthers their isolation and in no way is productive towards recovery.

      Actually I think the cause is far more obvious. Walk into any US supermarket and note how many aisles are devoted to snack / junk products compared to a European supermarket. Also note the size of packets, and the bullshit "nutrition advice" on the back where the smallest packet of crisps (potato chips) will say 3 servings or similar. Walk into any food court and note the virtual absence of any healthy food. Walk into any restaurant and note the size of the portions. Note the layout of most towns and note that a car is virtually obligatory. The cause is simple - too much fatty, high calorie junk food combined with a sedentary lifestyle.

      Europe has fatties too and in no small part its because its going down the same road as the US. I think there is no easy answer to eliminate obesity, but a good start might be to impose maximum fat / calorific limits on certain packaged foodstuffs and force nutrition advice to be for the entire packet and per 100 gram, as per Europe.

    24. Re:Its an american problem again. by Gaffod · · Score: 1

      Also from Turkey. Nobody likes fat chicks here either, guys who are like 200 kg might get made fun of by immature people. Isn't that the extent of the "discrimination" in US? Skinny people don't find fat people visually appealing?

    25. Re:Its an american problem again. by unity100 · · Score: 1

      armenians and orthodox christians are not discriminated against in turkey. in fact, many of the rich families are jews or christians.

      kurds are discriminated against in turkey. but the catch is, kurds discriminate GREATLY against anyone who are not in their CLAN, leave aside being from another nationality. clan based society is way too strong in kurdish culture, and noone is let in, or let to coexist with them in any place they get the greater numbers. not even other clans. it leads to shootings, murders, sometimes all out massacres like happened in 1.5 or so years ago, in which a group massacred 90 people who were attending a wedding by automatic weapons. their intention was to acquire some pieces of land which were going to soon pass to heirs to their own clan.

      not discriminating people who are by culture discriminating against you, is more than stupid. for, they are not going to embrace you when you embrace them. and they plainly say so.

      until the clan based society loses prominence in kurdish culture, and kurds start to coexist with other ethnicities as INDIVIDUALS rather than clans, noone will be easily embracing them, and neither should they. because its totally foolish.

      please dont make half assed generalizations about issues in remote countries again by the way. if you want so very much, do some extensive research, not believe everything what human rights groups in europe say, because what they know comes from only one side.

    26. Re:Its an american problem again. by unity100 · · Score: 1

      i have seen numerous. and i had a few friends who were (and some still are) overweight. actually people are expected to become somewhat overweight as they become older. and so you are considered 'fat' only if you are young and overweight.

      there arent any social stigmas regarding weight in turkey. you have to go really, really really go real overweight for it to be a 'stigma' or any other sort.

      actually some of the iconic figures in comedy/literature world are overweight people. and getting the name of one of them as a nickname is somewhat endearing, if you have managed to get one. 'tulum hayri' for example, from the school comedy 'hababam sinifi'.

      no, fat people are not discriminated in turkey at all. but, you can get pestered to death by warnings against diabetics and heart attacks from your close circle, or practically anyone you come up with, though.

    27. Re:Its an american problem again. by unity100 · · Score: 1

      http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1483516&cid=30504072

      in addition, turkey was a country that is secular, and pretty much anti islam in all state respects. this is changing due to the pro-islam government the american neocons (bush & co) got installed in 2002 though. tough luck, americans screwing up another country for their profits again, which will in turn come and bite them in the ass.

    28. Re:Its an american problem again. by unity100 · · Score: 1

      the level of being 'made fun of' in turkey and in america is much much different.

    29. Re:Its an american problem again. by brkello · · Score: 1

      I don't believe that at all. It's our lifestyle. Restaurants give us portions that can easily fill two.

      Yeah, it would be great to think that being nice to people makes them thinner. But that is just a load of crap. You are responsible for your own weight. Stop making excuses.

      --
      Support a great indie game: http://www.abaddon360.com
    30. Re:Its an american problem again. by Gaffod · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't be surprised. Still, since you can't really objectively/quantitatively measure "being made fun of", I wish someone would demonstrate with an example.

      (Or if there's some research done on the matter that would be great too.)

    31. Re:Its an american problem again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I'm looking for women, I go to a supermarket,

      Wow, Walmart really does have everything

  65. Not compatible with Bioshock 2. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can only hope this sort of thing is not planned to be incorporated into the multiplayer feature of Bioshock 2. It would cause no end of trouble: We can't all be Buck Raleigh now, can we?

  66. Wii Fit by chasisaac · · Score: 2, Informative
    Does not Wii Fit already do this?

    Another way to make life suck even more. I bet this is a deal with the new health care system to make more people kill themselves.

    --
    -- A computer without Windoze is like a choclate cake without mustard
    1. Re:Wii Fit by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Does not Wii Fit already do this?

      No. It does not.

      Proposing to generate fat avatars in gaming environments for individuals whose health records indicate they're overweight, limiting their game play, and even banning them

      The Wii Fit does not make your avatar appear bigger or smaller than how you set it. The closest thing that comes close to any kind of discrimination is it making constructive criticism on how to improve your health, not to shame you.

      Microsoft is trying to shift the blame of "Video games making people fat" by taking all the social stigma of the real world against obesity and putting it into their games.

  67. Microsoft already has ... by padrepio · · Score: 1

    the perfect avatar for the pictured child; its called the BSOD. Seriously though, so when does a software company think it should replace parenting?

  68. That's pathetic by name_already_taken · · Score: 1

    If you shame them in their one place to escape, they'll turn to another place to escape such as reading sci-fi.

    The horror! Not sci-fi! (btw... it's spelled syfy now).

    Won't somebody think of the children?!?! The rotund, wheezing, waddling children.

    I'm surprised they can manage to turn somewhere at all. At least in the olden days kids had to walk to the library or bookstore, so sci-fi reading had an exercise component.

    How many people can find pleasure only in gaming? It just doesn't seem plausible. At least when puberty comes along there's another thing they can do by themselves that's a lot more fun.

    --
    Putting moderation advice in your .sig lowers your karma!
  69. Can't Stop The FAT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So What, doesn't stop the people who share their account or hire other players to keep their characters leveling.

  70. What about disibilities? by Skraut · · Score: 4, Interesting

    One of the most touching things I ever had on Xbox Live was when I received a message I from a friend who always seemed to be on, but not in the previous 2 weeks. The message was from his mother thanking me, and everyone on his friends list for being his friend and telling us he had passed away. She continued to tell us he had Downs Syndrome, and at 21 years of age had passed away from complications of it. She told us that we, his virtual friends were the only friends he really seemed to have, because we didn't know about, or judge him because of his condition.

    Would this system have deprived him of the one joy he had in his life because he couldn't run the hundred meter dash, or didn't match up with some other physical standard?

    --
    Introducing Microsoft Vacuum 1.0 The first Microsoft product that doesn't suck.
    1. Re:What about disibilities? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did he drop any loot?

    2. Re:What about disibilities? by brkello · · Score: 1

      No, it wouldn't. I think everyone on here is taking this to an extreme that would in no way would ever be implemented.

      --
      Support a great indie game: http://www.abaddon360.com
  71. Blue Pill now for weight loss? by John+Whitley · · Score: 1

    "You are no longer an optimum energy producing unit. You are being ejected from the Matrix. Goodbye!"

    <schlorp, spitooie!>

  72. FINALLY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Microsoft also proposes shaping gaming experiences by using 'psychological and demographic information such as education level, ..., intelligence quotient...

    Does this mean I can finally play an online game without hearing prepubescent, homophobic brats calling eachother fags?

  73. I like big butts and I cannot lie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    36-24-36? Only if she is 5'3".

    1. Re:I like big butts and I cannot lie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod points for this one! I wish I had some to give you.

  74. Garlic, Ginseng, Mandrake Root by Haber-ery · · Score: 1

    Virtuous behavior? Avatars? Next thing you know Microsoft will be disabling the In Nami Ylem routines. I'm taking my Ankh and heading through the next moongate.

  75. nazi-like by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 1

    Yet I want this "No fat chicks" edition of the 360.

    1. Re:nazi-like by Jimmy+King · · Score: 3, Funny

      That feature is covered by the base "No chicks" edition 360.

    2. Re:nazi-like by H0p313ss · · Score: 1

      That feature is covered by the base "No chicks" edition 360.

      One of the many features that the PS3 can match.

      --
      XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
  76. This doesn't pass the laugh test by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To see this from Microsoft, implying a digital community where people's avatars are based on their real-world identities?
    X-Box Live is the anonymous gamers' paradise. Memberships are payable by untraceable prepaid game time cards, and the user space is littered with false identities and anonymous faces.
    Or did you think d00bietoker420 was his real name?
    At what point do they expect their pre-existing customer base to go legit and start signing up with real identities that would allow this system to even work, dystopian Orwellian connotations not withstanding?

    Signed,
    Anonymous Coward.

  77. All I care about is age. by NoPantsJim · · Score: 1

    I want avatars that show me how old everyone is, so I know who to mute before I am hit with an avalanche of "Ur a gay fag!" and "Fucking Hacker!"

  78. No way by thelonious · · Score: 1

    Who wants to be online and see the ladies sporting a c-section scar?

  79. I'm applying for a patent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm applying for a patent on making stupid business decisions. The main effect of this patent is to keep Microsoft from doing stuff like this.

  80. Yeah right... by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

    ...because the Internet is all about honesty, and they never entered anything false in all those bazillion registration forms on the net. ^^

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  81. While we're at it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd like to patent some clever adjectives that could be used to describe said persons in a manner that may stimulate self improvement. These creative original words may include: "lard butt", "tubbo," and "fat bastard."

    Moreover, I will use invasive marketing techniques to discover who is and is not a "fat bastard," and if they are, all their login requirements and profile names must be changed to something of the form fat_bastardXXX where XXX is a number assigned to them.

    Why will I do this, you ask? Simply because I want to help all you poor fat bastards out there, even though I know that 90% of my users are fat bastards...you must be eliminated.

    Next up, patenting gas chambers...

  82. PEDANT ALERT! by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

    Sorry, but you forgot the other 'A'. I hate it when that happens.

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  83. i have an ideea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok now I have an ideea for a game that'll make millions. Summo online the MMO. The more you eat the higher your power level.

  84. What about the sick and handicapped? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I know a guy who's been a quadriplegic, with limited upper body function, since a stupid motorcycle accident. Playing games using a special controller is one way he passes the time. Will he get a pass? Or will he be put in a motorized wheelchair in the game too? What about people getting chemo? Amputees? Will kids be made short? Will the elderly be given bad knees? Etc.?

  85. Butter Overflow Error by jameskojiro · · Score: 3, Funny

    You computer will now display the Blueberry Ice Cream of Death.....

    --
    Tsukasa: All I really want, is to be left alone...
  86. Welcome to fascism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Welcome to fascism

  87. Microsoft's MArket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    There goes Microsoft's gaming market. What next? "Sorry, this console doesn't turn on for smokers."

  88. Hello? What do you think where all those... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... wii (and other) extra-controllers for.

    Dance-pads, workout-pads, virtual body-suits... suddenly, you have some system that "pretends" to let you be the "Dance Master 3.0" or some "wristband-controller that does not even lies in your hand"... but in fact you have gizmos that send your weight and your wrist-size to . Hohoho!

    Don't believe them! They are after your weight!

  89. This sounds AWESOME by Arancaytar · · Score: 1

    Quick, tell me! Where do I sign up to pay for the privilege of being discriminated against for my views or appearance!

  90. I wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    will they also be making bald avatars?

  91. This has been my avatar by JahnTheSavage · · Score: 1

    for the online community longer than I can remember, and I'll be damned if I'm going to let my reputation be squandered by the likes of Microsoft--especially in this case.

  92. *cough* HIPAA by jvonk · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. At least you didnt spell it with two "p"'s. That's the worst.

    Anyway, I am very cynical of HIPAA. It has never protected me from health care providers making disclosures to third parties when I wanted (and was entitled to) privacy, and it just adds inconvenience when I want to do simple things like having a family member pick up one of my prescriptions ("Oh my god! We could never allow that, even if we had written authorization on file! Think of your privacy!").

    So... what did HIPAA accomplish? Well, now when I go to a pharmacy, they force me to sign a HIPAA disclosure/waiver before they will fulfill my prescriptions. What does this disclosure say? Stuff along the lines of "here is our policy on how we will violate your privacy when we feel like it. Don't you feel better knowing?". Of course, I could choose not to sign, but then they won't fill my prescriptions. Ah, being presented with a Hobson's choice over medical necessities always warms my heart about the human spirit.

    "Blessed are the coercers, for surely they will fuck you over while smiling at you."

    Anyway, to my point: yes, you are protected by HIPAA. However, my expectation is that they will just circumvent it by a click-through EULA waiver. No waiver, no play. There you go. Hobson would be proud.

    1. Re:*cough* HIPAA by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 5, Informative

      I work in the medical research field, and trust me, HIPAA does much more to protect your privacy than inconvenience your relatives at the pharmacy (Which may be a store policy and not a HIPAA thing. One pharmacy I went to would not let me fill someone else's prescription, but the next one I went to did. neither mentioned HIPAA as a reason.). It was a huge deal that our division spent 2 years getting ready for, and everyone had to do training on what is legal and what isn't. There was also a lot of behind-the-scenes work done with existing medical data - de-identifying them, randomizing them, etc. Just becasue you are not directly aware of what changed under HIPAA does not mean that nothing changed. HIPAA also gives the law some teeth - if you really think that your privacy was violated by a health provider, report them. This isn't something the courts simply look the other way on anymore.

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    2. Re:*cough* HIPAA by lasinge · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I feel as secure about government policy on the security of my private medical records as I do about security on voting machines or the security implemented on "mission critical" drones. That has worked out well. /sarcasm Which company are they going to outsource the implementation of security policy, and really who is auditing this stuff and can we have some transparency on this please?? And don't give me any crap about if people know how the security works then it will be insecure... look at the difference between security on open source in the linux world and the closed source approach the government usually takes.

      --
      you are in a twisty maze of different passages.
    3. Re:*cough* HIPAA by Unordained · · Score: 1

      Err ... teeth? As originally written, HIPAA did have fines, yes -- but only after they'd gone through a whole slap-on-the-wrist, many-strikes-you're-out process, to "help bring providers into compliance." So ... sure. Report them. And they'll get a nasty-gram telling them to please not do that again.

    4. Re:*cough* HIPAA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least until they pass the "Health Information Provisions for Preventing Obesity" (aka HIPPO) act, which will grant what was previously known as "highly sensitive" medical data to companies that have no relation to the medical field.

      Once this data is made available, persecution of individuals will be deferred to private corporations, thereby reducing the amount of taxpayer dollars that are spent for the government to do this dirty work.

      DISCLAIMER: The opinions presented above are satire and do not represent the views of Slashdot or the poster.

    5. Re:*cough* HIPAA by joemck · · Score: 1

      it just adds inconvenience when I want to do simple things like having a family member pick up one of my prescriptions ("Oh my god! We could never allow that, even if we had written authorization on file! Think of your privacy!").

      That's DEFINITELY store policy rather than regulation. The Rite-Aid stores near Boston allow family members to pick up prescriptions.

    6. Re:*cough* HIPAA by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 4, Informative

      Um, no. The slap on the wrist period is over. They had a transition period where they were not going to come down hard on you shortly after it was implemented, but the grace period is over. Screwing up now will cost you money, and more importantly guarantee you will never get any government grants for research, and no private firms will hire you because your reputation is shot. Research is huge huge money and companies are not going to risk that by being non-compliant. It will end up costing far more in the long run by having one small incident than it would to get things up to compliance levels.

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    7. Re:*cough* HIPAA by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, because there is only one small team in the government that is in charge of all 3 of those projects. When you have something other than a "I just don't trust the government to do anything" strawman argument, then we can talk seriously. Look at it this way - if you screw up with HIPAA, you will never get hired by anyone anywhere to do any more research. If that isn't incentive enough, I don't know what is. All the other crap you talk about - drones, voting machines, open source vs. closed source is just smoke and mirrors and have nothing to do with what we were talking about.

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    8. Re:*cough* HIPAA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're signing a disclosure, then you need to get your Rx willed somewhere else. I have NEVER been to a pharmacy that had me sign anything but the credit card slip. Also, report any hipaa violations, and the company can be hit with a $250,000 (i think that's what the numbers were the last time i went through corporate compliance at my hospital/employer) fine PER VIOLATION. Not to mention that the employee or employees that caused the violation also get fined something like $5,000 per violation.

      In fact, we have to get your permission to send your results to your doctor who ordered your tests/scans. And we have to ask if you want it sent to anyone else. If you say no, we can't send it anywhere.

      Looks like you're getting dicked over by your healthcare provider and need to report the violations to hipaa.

    9. Re:*cough* HIPAA by jvonk · · Score: 1

      Yes, I am (and was) aware of the penalties and fines involved. That is why I didn't press the issue: though I was embarrassed and very distressed at the several, unrelated disclosures (yes, they were clear-cut HIPAA violations), I didn't rate the tort as worth a quarter million dollars plus the inconvenience of a court case (which, of course, would cause further embarrassment).

      The particular circumstances of both violations were related to background circumstances that I doubt will ever change, despite the law now having additional teeth. I was unwilling to make pariahs of otherwise upstanding physicians over this particular circumstance, despite what happened in my case.

    10. Re:*cough* HIPAA by jvonk · · Score: 1

      Unless something has changed, HIPAA policies are defined by the organizations that are subject to HIPAA regulation. Isn't self-policing great?

      "Hooray! We are HIPAA-compliant based on the HIPAA policy that we wrote for ourselves and now interpret 'flexibly'!"

    11. Re:*cough* HIPAA by jvonk · · Score: 1

      I do have extensive experience with "both sides" of HIPAA (provider and consumer), and I have several specific rejoinders to your reply. I had a long reply written out; however, because I neglected to choose a completely random username way back in the day I deleted the response to avoid being haunted by the long-tail of the Internet.

      I do not expect anyone to lend credence to my allegations without further specifics, but I accept that.

      However, may I ask if you are in academia or in the corporate realm?

    12. Re:*cough* HIPAA by dbcad7 · · Score: 1

      The thing is, there is no compensation for the victim of a HIPAA violation. Yes the government can issue a fine, but it's basically just more income for them.. I know of a case where someone who works in a pharmacy was fired based on prescriptions that he filled at another pharmacy chains store.. The managers knew each other, and information was shared.. obvious HIPAA violation. Wrongful termination may get him somewhere, but the HIPAA law isn't going to get him squat.

      --
      waiting for ad.doubleclick.net
    13. Re:*cough* HIPAA by Miseph · · Score: 1

      B-b-b-but Ronald Reagan said government is the enemy!

      Don't you love people who insist on making government ineffective and wasteful on the grounds that government is ineffective and wasteful?

      --
      Try not to take me more seriously than I take myself.
    14. Re:*cough* HIPAA by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      Academia at a University. Look, I'm not saying HIPAA is perfect and 100% effective, but it is certainly a step in the right direction, and has changed the way the industry does things. Do you think we are worse off with the laws now than we were 10 years ago when it was basically the wild wild west?

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    15. Re:*cough* HIPAA by rtechie · · Score: 1

      While I disagree that he government is really "cracking down" on information leaks, the new rules certainly are being widely implemented. What other posters have said is accurate, HIPAA is basically about protecting customer data from hackers by isolating it and formalizing the rules of transferring data. It's the last thing that's the most important, because the real risk is that shady businesses will try to gather and resell information. A lot of the supposed "leaks" have really involved selling information to the wrong people.

  93. "Religious belief"... by Mornedhel · · Score: 1

    So, what ? I get to play as a Paladin of the Invisible Pink Unicorn ?

    I get improved resistances vs Purple Oysters (of Doom) and extra HP from pineapple pizza or something ?

    Oooh, can we start in-game jihads against the Pastafarian guys ? Or do only mainstream religion followers get to do that ?

    --
    This /.-related sig is a stub. You can help Mornedhel by expanding it.
  94. Yeah, but once they learn about that trick . . . by StefanJ · · Score: 1

    . . . PCs and consoles will come equipped with a robot arm that feels you up to determine your real gender.

    Or course, some users would pay extra for that.

  95. Re:Hope you have permission for that photo -- poor by Z1NG · · Score: 1

    Maybe the guy has a good sense of humor about it. Think of how famous the Star Wars kid could have been. Probably not very, but he might have gotten some good interviews and an extra 15 minutes. Sometimes the only difference between having people laugh with you and at you is whether or not you decide to join in. Having said that, I'm not sure why you got modded flamebait, you have a valid point, maybe it was the anonymouscoward part. Personally, I wish I knew that guy. What a bad ass.

  96. Re:ooh, fun! a patent to tattoo "undesireables." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ballmer: It's a rite of passage. Everyone has to play their part, with no role reversals! Trust me; it's fun being ridiculed as the fat kid on the playground.

  97. Nice going there by Minwee · · Score: 1

    So... will Microsoft be making a big donation to Child's Play any time soon?

    "This new X Box won't let me play today because it thinks I should get out of bed and do more exercise. It suggests half an hour of jogging. How many weeks did you say it be before I can walk again?"

  98. Good grief people by MrTester · · Score: 1

    I love it when people can only talk in extremes.
    Microsoft wants to patent this technology. So CLEARLY they will immediately use it for every application.
    CLEARLY they are just going to randomly access hospital records without getting any authorization.
    Come on folks. Get a clue.

    Someone at Microsoft (or one of their competitors withi a leak) has an idea for some sort of socially interactive physical fitness gaming network to compete with the Wii Fit. They dont want 450 lb Slashdoters having hearattacks while they try to "get in shape" by doing 3 situps, so they want to allow for sensors to see what sort of shape someone is in. (That gets them out of the lawsuit.) Someone says "While we are doing that we should allow for other means of in getting baseline data like medical records, cause they might do this fomrally in a retirement home or something."

  99. Is the picture really necessary? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    If shaming fat gamers is wrong, then why tack on the picture of The Greatest Nintendo Warrior? Hasn't this poor slob suffered enough?

  100. Rage against the (M)achine by NixonNowhere · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I can't quite express the shock and bile that this article literally provoked with me. I have a reason or two to be invested in this, though I'd love to think that I would be anyways. I'm both a fat chick, and disabled. The one easily has been associated with the other. Among some of my medical issues, I have several neuromuscular diseases that have resulted in partial paralysis with repetitive motion(such as walking, or any other 'continued' type motion, including brushing my own hair). My legs and arms routinely gimp out. I'm in a wheelchair if it's more than a very few steps. I need lots of help with my routine life. I'm also in severe neuropathic and musculoskeletal pain, due to nerve damage, chronic muscle spasms, spinal degeneration, et al. I only preface my rant with all of this in order to prove a point relevant to this topic:

    I have spent copious amounts of time online in various MMORPGs, from the very inception of Everquest, to the beginning of WoW, and have tried most of them in between, including the mostly 'social' ones. I have learned the game mechanics, as much as I'm able, and have participated socially, as much as I've been so inclined, at various times in my life (It's funny how that's decreased drastically in increments from EQ to WoW), and I have paid into the economy with the subscription fee associated with each. I have not, at any time, been an MMO addict, in that a pixelated game could ever interfere with my perception of 'real life', and its priorities.

    I have, however, used these games as a form of escapism from my pain and discomfort. To say otherwise would be a blatant understatement of the facts, and why? I don't see using an MMO, either one of the more strategic 'hack 'n slash' fantasy or sci-fi types (WoW, AO, Runescape, Eve Online) or a social (Sims Online, There, or Second Life) venue as being an unhealthy coping mechanism for a disabled person. We often spend so much of our time in a house, trapped inside of bodies that don't work, or are screaming silently with pain. To be able to thrive, leap, dance, run, and maybe kick some butt in a pixelated body is liberating. Never mind the opportunity to interact socially, unhindered, in the aesthetic form of our choosing, because isn't that what we -all- like to do?

    What this all essentially means is: Microsoft wants to nerf handicapped people.

    I'm barely going to get into the fact that Microsoft has alluded to the fact that they want to dig into my socioeconomic and medical data, because that both defies belief and insults my intelligence on a level to a degree that I truly believe they'll be reamed by people much bigger and badder than I am. (And I mean that on a less than literal level to any smart asses out there. =P )

    I'm going to imagine, for a moment, that I actually had the motor skills to play CoD6 with my best guy friend and his cool crew, Team Drunky. *Team Drunky moves in to engage the enemy with a tactical strike, having decided against the comedic, but less effective death-via-precision-supply-drop. A skirmish begins. Ferret likewise is out the gate, sniping at the opposing clan, but glances over his shoulder, unfortunately, at Nixon, who is slovenly shuffling in his general direction, in a cold sweat, upper body graced with an ill fitting flak jacket, an M16, that she cannot lift, sparking as it drags along the pavement. Ferret groans inwardly as he faces the dilemma of whether to join Team Drunky, and live, or whether to try and save his soon-to-be and as-good-as-dead friend, whose right leg has now completely ceased to work. "Save yourself, you idiot! This is completely fruitless!" Nixon yells, right before catching one dead between the eyes. Sadly, Ferret was relieved. Team Drunky was relieved. The opposing team was sorta relieved.

    Apparently Microsoft and America were relieved, because another fat person was kept off the net... back into the obscurity of their dark living rooms, in front of the television... where they belong... or something.

    I've often

    1. Re:Rage against the (M)achine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      cool story bro^H^H^H sis*

  101. Prior art by bugs2squash · · Score: 1

    My human form is simply the earthy representation of my plump soul in heaven and you can't prove otherwise.

    --
    Nullius in verba
  102. Re:ooh, fun! a patent to tattoo "undesireables." by dodobh · · Score: 1

    Set him on Texas instead?

    --
    I can throw myself at the ground, and miss.
  103. Is it April 1st? by Wee_Bit_Hazed · · Score: 1

    Seriously, did I time warp?

  104. This is Microsoft Covering Their Ass by stupidcomputers · · Score: 1

    This is Microsoft Covering Their Ass - this patent combined with project NATAL is about making sure Fatty Mcfatterson doesn't have a heart attack while punching the monkey. They will gracefully make the game easier so it doesn't stress out the player.

  105. Next up, the dirty dirty cripples by liquiddark · · Score: 1

    One has to wonder how one differentiates an unhealthy user from an unfortunate one.

  106. Video-games re-purposed by WATist · · Score: 1

    There'll be gaming fat farms and self improvement gaming; You're looking at it wrong.

  107. HIPAA doesn't mean anything. by jeko · · Score: 1

    Can anyone, anywhere, point out ONE time HIPAA was actually enforced beyond just a symbolic wrist-slap? Show me the company that was forced out of business, show me the CEO whose career was ended for HIPAA violations.

    Every single one of my "health providers" -- doctors, dentists and optometrists -- make me sign paperwork saying they can share my information with anyone they want. I tried to decline signing that paperwork once at an optometrist for an eye exam I was paying for out of my pocket.

    They kicked me out of the office.

    HIPAA works a lot like the TSA. It's just done for show.

    --
    He put his boots up on the table and made a face. "The sig," he smirked. "You can waste your life in search of the sig."
  108. Not So Bad by Dripdry · · Score: 1

    Although the "weight" method of stratifying gamers is absurd, what's wrong with separating people by age group or other metrics? For once we could have servers the way we have threads here: If you don't royally piss people off and you actively contribute to the gaming experience, you get "karma" and get to play with other people who have the same goals of enjoying the game, instead of fragbagging and teamkilling or whatever they do these days.

    I'm all for it. If you want to behave like an ass and ruin people's fun and stats, then you can play on an unregulated server with all the other cockwhirlers.

    --
    -
  109. Save the Children + Patent = Monopoly by stoicfaux · · Score: 3, Insightful

    1. "Everyone" "knows" that video games are unhealthy and are the reason why kids are fat nowadays.

    2. Tell the politicians that you've developed a way for video games to help prevent kids from getting fat.

    3. Tell the parents that you've developed a way for their computer/video games to *automatically" help prevent their kids from getting fat.

    4. Get a "Save the children!" law passed requiring that this Anti-Fat-Kid-Rights-Management software be mandatory.

    5. You have a patent on the Anti-Fat-Kids-Rights-Management idea.

    6. Profit from the monopoly.

  110. EULA: Fitness For a Particular Purpose Hypocrisy by stoicfaux · · Score: 1

    What the hell? The Microsoft Vista license states "Where allowed by your local laws, the manufacturer or installer and Microsoft exclude implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and non-infringement."

    If Microsoft cannot attest to the fitness of their own software, why do they think they can attest to my fitness!?!

  111. I can't wait by gothzilla · · Score: 3, Funny

    to see Stephen Hawking's avatar. I wonder if he gets a free mount.

  112. Real benefits? by Arterion · · Score: 1

    Maybe I'm confused, but aren't the real-world benefits of exercise and fitness way better than any a game could offer? I mean, if you can't entice someone with feeling great, longer life, and getting laid a lot, do you really think you can entice them with pixels on a screen? Really? I mean, I love me some video games, but... really?

    I think there is an aversion of activity that exceeds the rewards of it. Adding more rewards isn't really going to help, because the current rewards are, well, just amazing. I mean, it doesn't get much better than being hot, being healthier, and long life.

    --
    "That which does not kill us makes us stranger." -Trevor Goodchild
  113. calling the kettle black by slick7 · · Score: 1

    I have a better idea. Have everybody wear a yellow star and call them JUDE! A lame ass corporation that dictates appearance has no business being in business.

    --
    The mind conceives, the body achieves, the spirit manifests.
  114. WTF? by Anachragnome · · Score: 1

    This is so patently stupid (pun intended) that it should have never even seen the light of a Slashdot day.

    It will NEVER become a reality, for so many reasons(medical privacy rights would be a good place to start), so why are we even discussing this shit?

    Oh, right. Because it is funny.

    Please continue...

  115. hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i just love how many people cant see this is a joke. Keep whining about something that isnt real :D

  116. Acceptable Prejudice by Gogogoch · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Sizeism is one of several prejudices that seem currently acceptable by society. Imagine if the M$ news release said that game experience would change if the player were black; levels inaccessible because you were the wrong colour. Or female. Or gay. Or disabled.

    25-30% of Americans are obese, but much of society (including the obese) seem to buy-in to the view that skinny is good and obese is obscene - and so nothing changes. Look at the comments here. Similar comments against gays or blacks would be dismissed as troll, but here we're having a good laugh. Anyway, with so many people being targeted by M$ I doubt that M$ is doing itself much of a favour.

    Slashdotters who are quite happy to say: "fuck you, go on a diet ha ha" might do better by standing up for minorities that don't include themselves. In today's world we all have a job to protect our rights from the fucked-up ambitions of government, interest groups, and business, and divide-and-conquer is one of their ways of eroding rights.

    "Lets have DRM, filtering, and inspection because some people are pirates", "Let's have biometric responses and limitations because some people are fat", "lets limit others because of IQ", "lets fuck with them because they are a minority, and the majority will let it pass". Well its possible to make up distinctions that catch all of us - we all belong to one minority or another depending on how creatively you cut the cake - and if we go down this path we all get fucked. So we have to stick up for others as if it were ourselves.

    OK, help me get down off my soap box. Anyway, I'm a fat bastard and always have been. Nothing I can do about it. But I'll be alright so long as besides having fat avatars you can have avatars with 10" dicks :-)

  117. Just a other way to get on the pre existing condit by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

    Just a other way to get on the pre existing condition list.

    This is the same M$ that used to hire temps as full time to get out of paying for there health care.

  118. Athletes by pubwvj · · Score: 1

    So it sounds like they're going to do it on the body mass index scale. Dumb. That penalizes athletes who are in excellent physical condition. I'm 30 to 40 lbs over weight by those charts. But I'm not. I work hard physically, I farm, so I have a lot of muscle and dense bones. I have little body fat. My physical activity makes for a heavy body that puts my body mass way over for my height yet I am very healthy. Even life insurance companies have started to admit those charts are dumb. They fail to take in to account real health. Once again Microsoft is behind the times and simply wrong.

    What will they patent next? Racism?

  119. What about transgendered avatars? by Velex · · Score: 1

    This is irritating. I certainly won't be playing any games that implement this. I'm forced to be male despite being a woman IRL, and they want me to pay for the privelege in-game?! They'd at least better have shemale avatars. I pay good money for my meds.

    --
    Join the Slashcott! Stay away entirely Feb 10 thru Feb 17! Close all tabs to prevent autorefresh!
  120. Games starring Niles & Frasier Crane! I WANT! by Tolkien · · Score: 1
    A couple of things. One, the patent name "Avatar Individualized by Physical Characteristic" is indeed downright insulting to more shapely people (of which I'm not one). On the other hand, my second thought once I read this:

    Microsoft also proposes shaping gaming experiences by using 'psychological and demographic information such as education level, geographic location, age, sex, intelligence quotient, socioeconomic class, occupation, marital/relationship status, religious belief, political affiliation, etc.

    was OOH! I want to play Splinter Cell starring Niles & Frasier Crane!!!

  121. There are uses by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

    Detecting the FBI agent pretending to be a 13 year old girl could be useful, for many reasons. But despite the stupidity of such an easily fooled system for general use, there is a legitimate use: physical therapy with Wii-like or Dance-Dance Revolution like components, designed to measure progress in a genuine fitness program.

    And for related entertainment, there is the video "Do You Want To Date My Avatar?" at http://www.watchtheguild.com/the-guild/the-guild-music-video/.

  122. Yet Another Patent by flyneye · · Score: 1

    I'll take out a patent on Avatar with underdeveloped genitalia so whenever someone from microsoft uses an avatar they'll have to pay me.
    This will double in cost for any three letter executives who will have dickless avatars.

    --
    *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
  123. epic fail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a feeling this is one of those patents meant to obstruct/charge licensing on predicted development. This along with other Microsoft decisions highlites a growing and disturbing trend in the IT industry as a whole ie Google.
    Linux isn't the inherent answer either as folks like ubuntu are all too eager to follow suit.

  124. Nah by BigSlowTarget · · Score: 2, Insightful

    All your HIPAA rights are waived in the TOS. Did you click 'I agree'?

  125. April 1st come early by peterofoz · · Score: 2

    You've got to be kidding. So why stop with heath? Let's include sexual preferences and orientation, religious and social affiliations, and stereotypes based on where you live.

  126. But... by someone1234 · · Score: 3, Funny

    But Ballmer is damn fat as well. Why stop at games? They should deny access to all services for fat people, starting with HIM.

    --
    Patents Drive Free Software as Hurricanes Drive Construction Industry
    1. Re:But... by cgomezr · · Score: 1

      Ballmer's avatar might be fat, but he would still pwn the server with his Grand Mastery in Thrown Chairs.

  127. disgusting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just think this is fucking disgusting... Game world and real world should be entirely different entities...

  128. Why not incorporate full-body game controllers? by revjd909 · · Score: 0, Interesting

    Seriously, Nintendo is going in the right direction with their Wii controllers. Why not have wearable controllers, to make the gameplay more immersive? Then, when you're battling the dragon, or having a shoot-out, you're using your whole body. Want to do more damage to the dragon/goblin? Swing your arm around faster. Want to avoid getting shot? Lay down on the ground. Instead of sitting on the couch, eating chips, and getting a nasty case of repetitive stress disorder on your thumbs and wrists, we could actually be exercising. You could spot the addicts because they'd be fit as all hell.

    --
    *** once i really listened, the noise just went away. -liz phair
  129. Re:Yeah, but once they learn about that trick . . by DuChamp+Fitz · · Score: 1

    This could be a new Turing Test?

  130. Re:ooh, fun! a patent to tattoo "undesireables." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    prior art exists, now Ballmer has to chew carpets.

    Hitler was a lesbian?

  131. It's MS so who cares, but... by John+Pfeiffer · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I have to wonder what stake Microsoft has in teen suicide and school shootings that they'd think this is a good idea. A bit of a leap you say? Let me lay it out for you.

    Fat kid gets home from school, decides to play some games to put the bullshit he had to deal with at school behind him... Too bad his avatar is fat too! No escape from the ridicule and stupid crap! Or even worse, the same people who harass him at school start harassing him online, and then start harassing him at school ABOUT his fat avatar! BONUS POINTS!

    So, depending on the kid's psychological makeup there are three possible outcomes:

    1. Nothing at all. (Unlikely even for the well-adjusted.)
    2. Suicide. (Probably the more likely of the three.)
    3. School shooting. (Given access to firearms and having pre-existing psychological issues, I'd have to go with 'yep'.)
    --

    Friend: "The NIC is misconfigured..." Me: "No prob, I'll just telnet in and fix it." *Silence*
  132. WOW.....O.o Can Microsoft go any Lower? by CasperGemini · · Score: 1

    As the San Antonio Chapter President of the Entertainment Consumer Association, I will VOTE AGAINST this proposal because I believe Medical Records is like your Social Security Number, PRIVATE INFORMATION! If Microsoft did such thing, I will stop using my Xbox360 and sell it immediately, because I WONT use XboxLive if they will reveal my private Medical Records. MICROSOFT CAN YOU GO ANY LOWER!?

    1. Re:WOW.....O.o Can Microsoft go any Lower? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is probably a good idea.

      A few miles of jogging each morning too and less junk food and you might re-enter society on non-obese people.

  133. Windows icon will be huuuuge by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    The Microsoft Windows OS's avatar would then take up the whole screen.

  134. Aspect Ratio by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    Just change the aspect ratio of your screen such that your avatar is now normal and everybody else is a bean pole.

  135. In related news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft plan to have get out of that shooting rut by making the replacement for halo about sumo wrestlers

  136. Facebook by KalvinB · · Score: 1

    They're going to integrate Facebook Connect with XBox live so they can grab all your details.

    Seriously, Facebook has everything but IQ. Everything else you can put in there.

  137. WhattheHoly...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Erm, so is Microsoft to be viewed as pursuing a defense of truth in advertising? Or as being an asshat engaging in passive-aggressive defamation of character?

  138. hipslickncool by hipslickncool · · Score: 1

    Sounds like a lose, lose situation... I seems like the market strategists would see that this could really go all bad... Who are the majority that actually play video games? Most the people that I know that are big gamers really aren't in the best shape or they are our youth...

  139. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Okay, so I'm a chunky. And I will go ape shit on anyone who tries to blend mandatory fitness with gaming.

  140. Ill pay extra if the airlines adopt this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll happily pay extra if airlines start adopting this.

    I'm real tired of sitting next to a woman called "house" on my long flights.

  141. Re:Hope you have permission for that photo -- poor by raehl · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I hope that the photo of the overweight dressed with Nintendo garb is from someone you know, and that they gave permission for you to humiliate them in front of thousands of other people.

    What makes you think the picture is humiliating?

    If you think the picture is humiliating, aren't you the problem?

    If we all thought there was nothing wrong with the picture, then there wouldn't be anything humiliating about it, would there?

  142. Kind of like it, but... by Stepnsteph · · Score: 1

    I kind of like the idea of having an avatar that's similar to me. Weight, muscle, general appearance, and how the world could affect the avatar are all interesting idea.

    The patent also mentions pedometers and similar tools. Wii Fit was a start, but a system such as this one could encourage real-world exercising in order to see changes in your avatar and even to receive certain Achievements. Now those would be some achievements to show off. :) The game could theoretically guide the person toward a healthy amount of weight loss, which is monitored by the tools (eg; a Wii Fit board rip off, a pedometer, and so on). This is an ideal situation that assumes that no cheating is taking place.

    I could see such a game asking about asthma (or the like), but it clearly goes too far when talking about pulling in medical records. There are some obvious reasons for considerable concern, but there is also some interesting potential here.

  143. Fat kids can't hide... by Crummosh · · Score: 1

    ... and they lag irl

  144. outing gay players via their 'demographics' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    something like this would never happen. also, if it uses personal demographics, it could 'out' GLBTQ players, or you could have a situation where a transgendered person can't play as the character they identify as, or some other ridiculous situation. or simple typos that are so pervasive in bureaucratic record systems could lead to embarrassing or annoying 'errors' in your avatar.
    seriously though, something like this would just never happen, and if they tried, it would fail.

  145. What about sexual orientation? by alukin · · Score: 1

    Well, may be gamers must expose also sexual orientation, religion, size of penis, and other important for computer game information.

  146. No more anonymity: thanks M$! by Randym · · Score: 1

    A physical characteristic is accessed that has been nonvolitionally obtained from a user, avoiding the inconvenience or unaccountability of voluntarily supplied information.

    This is so ... wrong .. that it is hard to know where to start criticizing it. At first I thought it was an April Fool's joke a little too early, but then I clicked through to the patent itself. As a work of brilliant satire poking fun at the whole patenting process, it succeeds -- too bad it's for real! Anyway, here I go:

    1) M$ will obtain your data nonvolitionally -- to wit, without your consent! Leaving aside the obvious Constitutional implications of this (5th Amendment violation, for those keeping score), it raises the interesting question: where is this data going to come from? (And: can the source be spoofed?)

    2) More ominously, note the following claims:
    [0024]It should be appreciated with the benefit of the present disclosure that the physical characteristics that can be conveyed include can include health information pertinent to performance such as blood pressure, heart rate, pulmonary flow rate, weight, body fat index, strength, blood glucose level. These physical characteristics can be chronic conditions such as allergies, disabilities, diseases, etc., that facilitate locating people of similar sensitivities, lifestyle and background.
    [0025]In addition, the physical characteristics can include psychological and demographic information such as education level, geographic location, age, sex, intelligence quotient, socioeconomic class, occupation, marital/relationship status, religious belief, political affiliation, etc. Such information can be useful in enhancing social interaction as well as adjusting how an avatar performs in a competitive virtual environment.

    Needless to say, such 'physical characteristics' provide a fertile ground for discrimination. For example, imagine the following:

    You have been denied access to Fourth Reich because you are a Jewish scum. Your internet address has been logged; your home address has been located; a squad of Storm Troopers will be by shortly to teach you a lesson in respect.

    3) No more anonymity. Under this system, Publius -- the collective identity of the Founding Fathers when they were attempting to convince their fellow citizens of the necessity of a new form of government -- would have been ferreted out and they would all have been tossed into British gaols to await their trials for treason.

    And let's not forget M$s ultimate goal:

    NON-WINDOWS SYSTEM DETECTED.

    --
    DNA is a Turing machine. You, however, being dynamic and emergent, are not.
  147. Human Rights and internet privacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a blatant abuse of internet privacy, No entertainment industry should mandate such things and pry into the lives of their customers like that. It's the right of any person to play a game if they want to and if they are overweight, underweight, or ideal it should be up to them and their doctor, Not Microsoft!

    Sickest thing is we would be paying money to these people for this 'service'.

    In no other industry can a manufacturer screw with their customers more then in the game industry!!!

    BTW, I have many gamer friends who are of many different weight classes... One friend is superskinny and another is a large (but not fat guy) how are these people going to be looked at, cause their is nothing wrong physically but they would not be able to change the fundamentals of their bodies, it's just genetics.

    This is just more proof that choice is not a 21st century value.

  148. Microsoft's FAT patent fetish by anonum · · Score: 1

    Maybe the folk at Microsoft feel that they're not getting enough licensing revenue of their existing FAT patents...
    http://www.microsoft.com/iplicensing/productDetail.aspx?productTitle=FAT%20File%20System

  149. Shit, and I used to worry about the nanny *State*? by jcr · · Score: 1

    Not that I have any plans to become a Microsoft customer, but still. The idea of having exercise advice shoved down my throat by a company run by that tub of goo, Steve Ballmer, is beyond asinine.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  150. Rockband avatar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's funny thing, I was playing Rockband 1 and upon urging of my friends, I decided to make a character for my game. Now, I'm not too fat, but I decided that I was going to make a fat character for my game. Why make your avatar look just like you? I wanted to create a Jack Black esque character. So I found the weight slider and move it to heavy. Unfortunately the made my character muscular. I told my buddies, "Dammit, I don't wanna be buff, I wanna be fat!" The idea that someone would want to create a fat character didn't even cross the developers mind.

    This reminds me of another article on Second Life that said there were no fat avatars in that game either. Not because the capability wasn't there, but nobody, and I mean, NOBODY, elected to do so. We need more fat video game characters and avatars. Aren't you tired of always playing a hard bodied hero in every game?

    In film there's the everyman character. But we have yet to see that in games. The closest thing I can think of is Nathan Drake, with his easy going attitude. That's ridiculous though, cuz he's a globe trotting treasure hunting babe magnet. I can't identify with him.

  151. In related news ... by BodhiCat · · Score: 1

    In related news, Microsoft patented the act of inhaling oxygen and exhaling co2. A judge has issued an injunction against breathing for everyone until the case is resolved.

  152. Re:Hope you have permission for that photo -- poor by panda · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Actually, the kid in the picture is my younger brother. The picture was taken 15 to 17 years ago. One of his friends must have scanned it and put it online somewhere.

    He doesn't look like that today. He started a weight lifting regimen about 10 years ago and he is probably in much better shape than most of the people making fun of this picture online.

    --
    Just be sure to wear the gold uniform when you beam down -- you know what happens when you wear the red one.
  153. This will never be implemented in a game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Features are supposed to help sell games when they're in a nice bullet-point on the back of the box. I don't see anyone in charge of making a game wasting resources on a feature which is likely to decrease sales.

  154. I predict... by vegiVamp · · Score: 1

    I've been looking into my crystal ball, and I predict that the number of hot girls on the internet is going to drop to near-zero.

    --
    What a depressingly stupid machine.
  155. Aha! by GrubLord · · Score: 1

    Finally, a use for my PhD!

  156. Microsoft's alter-ego in other cultures by mattr · · Score: 1

    This post once again made me feel extremely nauseated about Microsoft and it got me thinking.
    People are people all around the world, we are taught different things but there is some kind of psychological DNA if you will, maybe it's based on brain structures or the lack of them, but I have a feeling you will find similar types of personalities in different places.
    It is why art and stories written centuries ago still strike a chord, why movies from other countries can be endearing.
    I imagine the Microsoft attracts more pathologies than most companies, and I wonder what positions in society those types of personalities would occupy.
    I imagine Microsoft execs would feel quite at home sitting on the ruling council of a religious fanatic society in the Middle East.
    I wonder where in Africa you will find similar personalities.. and where in the U.S. you will find those of the criminal exec-types found in those countries?
    We should try and recognize a pathology and do something about it, instead of just turning our eyes away. It is gross, nauseating, yes it might make you want to kill yourself if you have to actually have a conversation with these horrible individuals at Microsoft, but maybe we should actually try to remove them from their posts and give them intensive professional counseling before they get taken seriously and have stupid ideas actually implemented.
    On the other hand, doing nothing is perhaps safest. At least they aren't being handed live weapons.

  157. Anyone hasnt mentioned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...that microsoft is most likely only doing this just to avoid potential lawsuits from parents of obese children playing their xbox360s and claiming their children became fat from playing 16hrs a day on their consoles and getting diabetes from it. Period.

  158. People who live in glass houses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fat people...the last great frontier of discrimination.

  159. This cannot be real. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If this is indeed true, I will never buy another product from Microsoft again. This reeks of communism. People are too GD nosey these days.

  160. Thanks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For deleting my post, and proving my point.

  161. So, when will by AlgorithMan · · Score: 1

    Although I don't think this is a completely bad idea, I have to wonder - when will the NFL, NBA, MLB and NHL be limited to people with an IQ > 120?... exercising the mind would do some of these guys well either, don't you think?...

    --
    The MAFIAA is a bunch of mindless jerks who will be the first up against the wall when the revolution comes
  162. Microsoft suppodely caring about health by adam2348 · · Score: 1

    This is Microsoft's way of showing they care about their gamers health. Something like saying, "we want you to be healthy so we are going to limit you from playing the game." Basically, this is combating the idea that games are the reason for people being fat. For instance, if you are addicted to a game too much, you may not exercise like you normally would. They want you to be addicted, so they just found another way to make sure you still exercise. They decided to limit or block you from playing until you have exercised. They are talking about more than just checking your medical records here. They are talking about checking your health instantly before you try to play. Or maybe somehow linking in to even more record keeping, that isn't used yet, by places like gyms. They also want to find ways to make sure your not slacking on other aspects of your life because of their games. That or they just don't want you to be able to blame them anymore. They want to be able to tell if you are socializing, getting along with people, and just about anything else people blame games for. What it amounts to is, "Have you been a good boy today? Well then, you can play." Otherwise, get out there and fix what your not doing. Fighting with your girlfriend? Go make up, then you can play. *ring ring*, real life is calling. If you don't want to answer, we'll glue the phone to your ear!

  163. no. by unity100 · · Score: 1

    it doesnt happen. neither publicly, nor privately. the most overweight people suffer from is constantly being reminded/scolded about diabetics and heart attack possibilities. occasionally they may get nicknames. but depending on their character, they happen to be endearing nicknames from prominent overweight figures from comedies in movie/literature, or generic nicknames. then again, any person who has a noticeable character gets a nickname, not just overweight.

    I very much have the idea that you're a bit of a well-meaning naif who can only imagine the world as you've experienced it ... but that you are nonetheless wrong. It's nice that you have never seen discrimination, and can't imagine it. That doesn't change that it does, in fact, exist. I have never personally seen a platypus ... and since I've had this rock, I've not been mauled by tigers. Neither of these statements change the existence of the platypus, or the fact that there aren't tigers nearby anyway.

    there. this was the kind of shitty attitude i was talking about. just out of your ass, you were able to just evaluate who was i, and what i know and what i dont, with just from a posting that contradicts your perceptions and experience. its as if the world revolves around you, and yours is the 'real' world, whereas others' are always some 'exceptions'. this is the shitty attitude thats dominant in america, regardless of you are an american or not.

    im not going to even justify that kind of half assed uninformed generalization with a reply. i will just repeat that this is a 7 billion crowded world, and 250 million populated america is but a tiny part of it.

  164. oh boy. by unity100 · · Score: 1

    you made conclusions out of your ass, and some morons modded you insightful.

    show me ANYthing in what i said from which you can create a correlation in between the number of overweight people in a country, and the behavior towards overweight people in that country.

  165. Lawsuits in 3... 2... by anyGould · · Score: 1

    I'd love to see what the response to disabled folks will be on this one.

    My wife's cousin is confined to a wheelchair. Does that mean his avatar will be required to be in one as well?

    Actually, the whole idea of "shaping" the gamer's experience by:

    psychological and demographic information such as education level, geographic location, age, sex, intelligence quotient, socioeconomic class, occupation, marital/relationship status, religious belief, political affiliation, etc.

    is screaming "discrimination lawsuit"

  166. As I recall, he's by garote · · Score: 1

    In Ultima 7, hacking his way through the Forge of Virtue.

  167. Uh... Wii fit? by Phreakiture · · Score: 1

    I think Wii Fit constitutes prior art -- within the context of the program, your avatar's appearance changes in response to your body weight.

    --
    www.wavefront-av.com
  168. Taco Unmasked! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is that Cmdr Taco in the blue Jedi get-up?

  169. Re:Hope you have permission for that photo -- poor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dude, the guy has a Powerglove. A gamer's most dirty desire.
    A POWERGLOVE!

  170. What if I am playing a Fitness game? by Stregano · · Score: 1

    What if I am playing DDR or some game where I actually stay active. I can actually gain a sweat from Tony Hawk Ride (and a good sweat at that as well).

    So Microsoft will turn off or ban my X-Box when I am playing a game that keeps me active? That sounds pretty dumb if you ask me.

    I have actually lost over 50 pounds. I used to weigh right around 315 and got down to 250. My motivation to get even more active with working out was playing video games that kept me active like Benami dancing games.

    There are alot of games that keep up on our feet now. Microsoft would need to check and ensure I am not playing one of those games.

    This will also open the door for a buttload of shovelware that keeps you active as well.

    --
    The world is how you make it
  171. Disability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder how this is going to work for disabled people. I'm overweight because I can't walk, which happens to be the same reason I play so many video games instead of exercising (which I do actually do, in a way, but it's physiotherapy). Even if there's an opt out or a "disabled" get out option I don't think I want to use it, the opt outers will just be labelled as fatties who are embarrassed to tell people their real weight and I don't want a great big "disabled" tag on my avatar. The great thing about the anonymity online gaming is that nobody knows I'm disabled, people mean to be nice but as soon as they find out they start being a bit too nice, like I'm a kid playing with adults who needs everyone around them to hold back. I really prefer it when no one knows.

    I won't be happy if we have to put our real genders in either. I'm female but I usually play as a man to avoid the sexual harrassment, rape threats (have had these) and the embarrassment when 13 year old boys ask if you have a boyfriend (I'm 27). But who knows, maybe I won't have to worry about this stuff when all my characters are fatties in wheelchairs.

  172. Re:Hope you have permission for that photo -- poor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope that the photo of the overweight dressed with Nintendo garb is from someone you know, and that they gave permission for you to humiliate them in front of thousands of other people.

    What makes you think the picture is humiliating?

    If you think the picture is humiliating, aren't you the problem?

    If we all thought there was nothing wrong with the picture, then there wouldn't be anything humiliating about it, would there?

    Brilliant insight, friend. Building walls and hedges around ourselves to try and hide our defects has only created a world in which we all look at each other through such murky, ugly lenses. Nobody can be comfortable as they are; this affects the haters more than it affects those that they hate. How many of you out there find that you hate just about everyone, for the most minute little quibbling details, you are driven to near-loneliness by your inability to like others. Embrace humanity; none of us is perfect. Perfection is a state of stagnation from which no further improvement is possible. No human ever reaches this state, and thank heavens for that because it's lonely at the end of the road.

    That picture is nothing more than a photo of a young kid probably having fun dressing up with his various nintendo gear... I don't see why you find that it should be humiliating to him... But I do understand why you say so. There is this pervasive aura of fear in human society these days. People so afraid of being seen as deviant, defective, weird, afraid of making waves or ripples, afraid of being rejected by other humans. You repress your own harmless desires for no good reason, and sup on hatred and ridicule and constantly compare and contrast everything with one another in a subtle dance of synchronization whereby you adopt the characteristics most likely to help you avoid social friction.

    Conflict is the BREAD and WATER of life. Without it, you cannot be called a living thing. You are flotsam in the stream of particles comprising timespace. What else but conflict gives the world evidence that each of us has his own will?