Slashdot Mirror


Where To Start With DIY Home Security?

secretrobotron writes "I'm a recent university graduate from a co-op system which has kept me on the move every other semester, so I've never really had a permanent place to live, and I've never had the opportunity (or the capital) to buy expensive things. Now that I'm working, those restrictions on my life are gone and I'm living in an apartment with things I don't want stolen. I would love to build a DIY home security system, but I don't even know where to start since Google searches reveal things like diysecurityforum.com, which help only to an extent for a curious newcomer. Has anybody out there successfully built a home security system on a budget? If so, where did you start?" Related query: When similar questions have come up before, many readers have recommended Linux-based Zoneminder (last updated more than a year ago); is that still the state of the art?

825 comments

  1. a gun by larry+bagina · · Score: 5, Funny

    and if that doesn't work: more gun.

    --
    Do you even lift?

    These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    1. Re:a gun by SleazyRidr · · Score: 4, Funny

      If violence didn't work, it's because you didn't use enough of it!

    2. Re:a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And for when the dweller is not home, may I suggest video cameras which stream to a safe room (or offsite), triggered by motion, with a pre-motion buffer of a few minutes. Record sound too.

      Also, remote controlled wall guns.

    3. Re:a gun by Meshach · · Score: 2, Funny

      and if that doesn't work: more gun.

      Any chance you are from Texas?

      --
      "Maybe this world is another planet's hell"
      Aldous Huxley
    4. Re:a gun by peacefinder · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And a dog.

      --
      With reasonable men I will reason; with humane men I will plead; but to tyrants I will give no quarter. -- William Lloyd
    5. Re:a gun by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 1

      Now we can't answer this question, because "Is my home secure?", well, that would fall within the purview of your conundrums of 'philosophy'.

      We engineers solve practical problems.

    6. Re:a gun by SleazyRidr · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Actually, come to think of it, a well-trained dog is probably one of your better security options.

    7. Re:a gun by glueball · · Score: 4, Funny

      A sticker on your door with the weapon of choice and a message saying "We don't call 911"

    8. Re:a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Screw a dog, train a parrot to fly to the local police station! Avian-Based Home Security System.

    9. Re:a gun by SleazyRidr · · Score: 1

      Video cameras? All they do is get you a pretty picture of the guy who stole you stuff.

      You need a gun triggered by a motion detector.

    10. Re:a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      If you resort to DIY then you have nothing worth protecting. If you do have something that needs protecting, get insurance, and a real security company.

    11. Re:a gun by Chyeld · · Score: 1

      He's from Bee Cave Texas, to be exact.

      Meet the Engineer

    12. Re:a gun by peacefinder · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Screw a dog..."

      Umm. I think you want 4chan.

      --
      With reasonable men I will reason; with humane men I will plead; but to tyrants I will give no quarter. -- William Lloyd
    13. Re:a gun by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 5, Funny

      Actually, come to think of it, a well-trained dog is probably one of your better security options.

      Indeed ... especially if he's well-trained enough to use a gun.

    14. Re:a gun by HBoar · · Score: 1

      It's sad that so many people share your views on DIY these days. A reasonably intelligent person is perfectly capable of doing almost anything for him/herself to a high standard with a little patience and humility. It's not the easiest, fastest, and often not the cheapest way to do something, but it is almost always the most satisfying way.

    15. Re:a gun by Barny · · Score: 1

      Well don't that just beat awl?

      --
      ...
      /me sighs
    16. Re:a gun by tsm_sf · · Score: 1

      Actually just buying renters insurance (cheap) and getting to know your neighbors (real cheap) will cover 99% of your concerns. You might also question the wisdom of moving to an area where you earn significantly more than your peers.

      What you really need to do is ask yourself how much paranoia your stupid hdtv is worth.

      --
      Literalism isn't a form of humor, it's you being irritating.
    17. Re:a gun by DeadDecoy · · Score: 3, Informative

      Ah that reminds me of one of my favorite signs: "Warning: prosecutors will be violated."

    18. Re:a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Fuck me. Don't you like colloquialisms?

    19. Re:a gun by gandhi_2 · · Score: 1

      Claymores.

    20. Re:a gun by ashkar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I've heard of some straight up horrible things happen to dogs when their owners were away. One of my friends came home from work a few years ago and found his dog with a screwdriver through its head. I've heard of oven cleaner being used. Truly fucked up.

      I'm a decent sized guy that has been attacked a couple of times by dogs as well (a pit and a doberman), and while I have some good scars, I wasn't ever too worried about handling myself against them. I am scared of rottweilers, but I can easily out run one of those fat fucks. Multiple dogs are really needed to scare off an experienced thief. Even then, don't grow too attached to a guard dog. They don't have great chances if someone wants what you have.

    21. Re:a gun by Grimbleton · · Score: 1

      I grew up in a pretty straight-across-the-board area.

      There were robberies almost bi-monthly. Usually local kids.

    22. Re:a gun by JustOK · · Score: 3, Funny

      or nukes from orbit, just to be sure.

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    23. Re:a gun by Locke2005 · · Score: 2

      "There is no problem that cannot be solved by a suitable application of high explosives." - US Army Demolitions School

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    24. Re:a gun by JustOK · · Score: 1

      Don't you like colloquialisms?

      is that what you kidz are calling it these days?

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    25. Re:a gun by Idarubicin · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Actually, come to think of it, a well-trained dog is probably one of your better security options.

      ...Assuming that the original poster actually likes dogs, and will enjoy taking care of one.

      The likely cost of dog, plus regular veterinary maintenance, plus daily feeding, plus pet-sitting while away on holiday or business is substantial. (Remember, you can't board your security system at a kennel, or even store it at a friend's place while you're away -- it doesn't work, then.) You're out of pocket for quite a bit more than the typical homeowner's insurance policy, and the cost of dog food is probably comparable to most security system monitoring charges.

      Meanwhile, the typical security system doesn't need to be walked twice a day (rain, snow, or sunshine), isn't going to shed on all of your clothing, and won't chew on your shoes.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    26. Re:a gun by Kizeh · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Spoke with a local cop across the street. His take on the best defenses: 1) know your neighbors so they know who does and doesn't belong so they'll call the cops when they see something out of order - this is what he says catches most of the burglaries that he's seen; 2) a dog. As to alarm companies and such he says he doesn't recall a single instance where they managed to catch anyone in a residential burglary because of an alarm going off, monitored or unmonitored. Take this as hearsay.

    27. Re:a gun by Failed+Physicist · · Score: 1

      Well, a good defense always starts with a good offense.
      You americans understand, what with this being codified in your constitution, the blood of patriots and tyrants, etc.
      So, if you cannot afford a big honkin' gun, or are in a nation where that basic necessity is overlooked, you should definitely look into potato guns, and molotov cocktails.

      Trust me, you'll need that firepower.

    28. Re:a gun by Locke2005 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I used to live in a apartment in a bad neighborhood with a sticker on the window with a picture of a gun and the text "Never mind the dog -- beware of owner!" But, honestly, it was my girlfriend who put up the sticker!

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    29. Re:a gun by Idarubicin · · Score: 4, Funny

      Actually, come to think of it, a well-trained dog is probably one of your better security options.

      Since when is an option that requires me to handle dog excrement on a daily basis a 'better' option?

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    30. Re:a gun by jeillah · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yes but will your fancy 'lectonix give you puppy kisses when you are feeling blue???

    31. Re:a gun by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 2, Funny

      Indeed ... especially if he's well-trained enough to use a gun.

      Naw, just train the dog to chew off the toes of thieves . . . http://idle.slashdot.org/story/10/08/04/1547221/Dog-Eats-Mans-Toe-and-Saves-His-Life#commentlisting

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    32. Re:a gun by slinches · · Score: 1

      Yes, a gun probably would be better. An awl could be almost as effective in the right hands, but it requires you to get much closer to the intruder and therefore increases risk. It's also far less of an immediate deterrent compared to an imposing weapon like a shotgun.

      --
      Knowledge Brings Fear
    33. Re:a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Naw, just train the dog to chew off the testicles of thieves . . .

      FTFY.

    34. Re:a gun by timmarhy · · Score: 1, Informative
      the point is more that if your a thief, which house are you going to rob - the one where you get torn up by a dog or the one without a dog???

      if you have something worth so much people will brave a savage dog, it needs to be in a bank vault not your home

      --
      If you mod me down, I will become more powerful than you can imagine....
    35. Re:a gun by Fred+IV · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It really depends on if the thief wants to break into a house or if they want to break into your house specifically. Dogs are like thorn bushes under your windows...they won't stop someone who really wants in, but they can be enough of a deterrent to convince someone less motivated to rob someone else instead.

    36. Re:a gun by Kelbear · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the security companies don't do anything for you because they're not THERE to do anything about the robbery in progress. The cops aren't going to do anything but take notes after the robbery is over because they're not THERE to do anything about the robbery in progress.

      1) A gun
      2) motion-detection system with an alarm.
      3) A dog would work in the same way, but that's a lot of upkeep.

      Just hope you don't get robbed, and be prepared to shoot anyone that does rob you (If you want to take the extra risk you can try to warn them before shooting). Nobody else will help you because they're all too late.

    37. Re:a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As to alarm companies and such he says he doesn't recall a single instance where they managed to catch anyone in a residential burglary because of an alarm going off, monitored or unmonitored. Take this as hearsay.

      Isn't the standard policy to send one or two officers to investigate for a middle-class neighborhood? Plenty of opportunity for a burglar to simply hop the fence when the police arrive.

    38. Re:a gun by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Some nut with a bomb blew up my house is a problem that cannot be solved with high explosives.

    39. Re:a gun by ushering05401 · · Score: 1

      A loud alarm and some dazzlers is about as far as you could go without violating the booby trap laws. I think electrical devices not intended to explode, trigger an explosion, produce harmful vapors, or likely result in permanent loss of ability can be used safely.

      There is probably still liability, but more likely civil suit for a blind spot because the idiot tried to disable a dazzler didn't realize it would shine through his eyelids at close proximity vs criminal suit for setting a trap with intent to maim.

    40. Re:a gun by KahabutDieDrake · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "There is no problem that cannot be solved by the suitable retroactive application of high explosives".

      Had you blown up the nutter first, your house would be fine.

    41. Re:a gun by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1, Interesting
      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    42. Re:a gun by antdude · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Why was this marked insightful? It should be funny. I don't have any points to do that. :(

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    43. Re:a gun by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      The cost of security maintenance goes down some when you feed the intruder to your security system. ;^)

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    44. Re:a gun by morari · · Score: 1

      Agreed. However, that doesn't help the fellow while he's at work or on vacation.

      Generally speaking, people usually set themselves up for home invasion. Don't tell people when you're going to be out of town and try not to have a routine schedule. Also, unless it's one of your two or three [b]real friends[/b], don't even let them step inside the door! Don't let the mailman peak in when you open the door. People aren't going to break into your house unless you paint yourself as a target.

      --
      "He who can destroy a thing, controls a thing." --Paul Atreides, Dune
    45. Re:a gun by morari · · Score: 2, Informative

      That may be true, but they're probably not worth the maintenance... or the smell... or the hair all over your furniture.

      --
      "He who can destroy a thing, controls a thing." --Paul Atreides, Dune
    46. Re:a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm, sounds like you need more guns

    47. Re:a gun by omniplex · · Score: 1

      Actually, come to think of it, a well-trained dog is probably one of your better security options.

      Doesn't need to be a well-trained dog. We had 3 Siberian Huskies and they loved to bark when people walked by the front of the house while they were standing on the back deck. Pretty much everyone in the neighborhood knew we had the dogs, and despite everyone knowing they wouldn't attack anyone people were just afraid of them because of how they looked. Our dogs were not "well-trained" and were very stubborn ( they would howl back at you if you told them to sit or do anything they didn't want to do ), but people were afraid of them even though they would never attack anyone.

    48. Re:a gun by TimSSG · · Score: 1

      I like the ones with next of kin forms/Instructions on where to send the remains. Tim S.

    49. Re:a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have any plans to build, like, a sentry?

    50. Re:a gun by daveime · · Score: 1

      You're out of pocket for quite a bit more than the typical homeowner's insurance policy

      So rather than pay for your own security, you prefer to let everyone else pay for it after your house has been robbed. How very philanthropic of you.

    51. Re:a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i call bullshit on the moving thing.

      we live in a relatively safe area and yet we got broken in.

      developing relationship with neighbors is important indeed, but not cheap at all. and i dont mean money, its time and effort. some just arent good at doing that.

      a good dog is always a good idea (if possible in your circumstances).

    52. Re:a gun by daveime · · Score: 4, Informative

      An awl could be almost as effective in the right hands, but it requires you to get much closer to the intruder and therefore increases risk

      Not of you shoot a bundle of them from a siege mounted crossbow.

      (Apologies to Sir Terry for stealing Detritus' weapon of choice).

    53. Re:a gun by larry+bagina · · Score: 1

      with budget cuts due to the recession, standard policy in many places is to do nothing.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    54. Re:a gun by Dahamma · · Score: 2, Informative

      If violence didn't work, it's because you didn't use enough of it!

      I thought that was the rule for XML...

    55. Re:a gun by Idarubicin · · Score: 4, Informative

      So rather than pay for your own security, you prefer to let everyone else pay for it after your house has been robbed. How very philanthropic of you.

      You betray your lack of understanding of simple economics. The insurance company isn't interested in subsidizing you. They will charge (to the very best of their penny pinching knowledge) exactly what they expect to pay out in claims, to a person with similar income, living in a similar apartment, in a similar neighborhood -- plus a comfortable markup for their trouble.

      If you choose a homeowner's policy with a sensibly high deductible, then you're covered for catastrophic losses (the only really necessary role of insurance, for anyone with a shred of financial sense), but you're not on the hook for the (rather silly) folks who think that an insurance policy should protect them from anything and everything unfortunate that might ever happen to them. Not only that, by choosing such a sensible policy, you're also only sharing your risk with similarly sensible people.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    56. Re:a gun by confused+one · · Score: 2, Funny

      Claymores leave an awful mess. Chemical weapons, made of household chemicals easily obtained at the hardware store will burn (if not disable) the invader and are easier to clean up. And you have plausible deniabiliity: "Officer, I have no idea why this person decided to enter my house then douse himself with a concentrated mix of bleach, ammonia and drain cleaner."

    57. Re:a gun by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Is there some virulent new strain of libertarianism going around that finds voluntary, contractually based, private-sector risk pooling to be insufficiently individualistic? Seriously?

    58. Re:a gun by tuxgeek · · Score: 1

      Home security is usually based upon locks, they keep honest people honest. If you have an electrified fence or wall, this may work to keep bad guys out. As a former construction worker, I can get into anyone's home with a cordless sawzall. Who needs doors, just cut your own pass through in an exterior wall. Unless of course the wall is concrete, this is the best security. Concrete and electrified solid steel doors.

      Security dogs can be killed. You have to be home for a gun to work.

      Stephen Colbert prefers the old flaming moat filled with fire resistant alligators.

      --
      "Suppose you were an idiot...and suppose you were a member of Congress...but I repeat myself." Mark Twain
    59. Re:a gun by russotto · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No, but there's a nasty old strain of authoritarian who thinks that simply because you are in the same insurance risk pool as he is, he has the right to control your behavior to reduce your risk.

    60. Re:a gun by tuxgeek · · Score: 1

      I once saw one of those on the home of a state trooper
      If I was a bad guy, I'd pick another house in another neighborhood..

      --
      "Suppose you were an idiot...and suppose you were a member of Congress...but I repeat myself." Mark Twain
    61. Re:a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You say a gun, but I say a boot to the head

    62. Re:a gun by jasno · · Score: 2, Informative

      We had an incident nearby about a year ago where some asshole sprayed two dogs with bear mace as he broke-in. Dogs are great, but they're not perfect.

      --

      http://www.masturbateforpeace.com/
    63. Re:a gun by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

      And for when the dweller is not home, may I suggest video cameras which stream to a safe room (or offsite), triggered by motion, with a pre-motion buffer of a few minutes. Record sound too.

      I tried this with a couple of webcams. For a cam pointing out the window, it is very hard to get the sensitivity right. Cloud shadows, cars going by, neighborhood kids riding bikes...All trigger the motion detector, unless you get it exactly right.

    64. Re:a gun by pspahn · · Score: 1

      That headline would be unfortunate to read.

      --
      Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
    65. Re:a gun by oldspewey · · Score: 1

      Not sure whether it would run afoul of the booby trap laws, but I've often thought it would be a nifty trick to set some kind of device that sprays the perp with indelible purple dye. Then you just tell the cops "look for the guy who's going to be bright purple for the next few days - you can't miss him."

      --
      If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
    66. Re:a gun by pspahn · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Defense in Depth. Buddy dog is just a layer. He's only really there to WARN you, and if he must, protect you by attacking so that you have enough time to make your escape... or to grab a vase or other living room-type of heavy object so you can make your Hollywood counter-attack.

      --
      Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
    67. Re:a gun by Delarth799 · · Score: 1

      Maybe not completely solved but you could at least get even by blowing up his house

    68. Re:a gun by Delarth799 · · Score: 1

      I always liked the sign that says: "Trespassers will be shot, survivors will be shot again"

    69. Re:a gun by pspahn · · Score: 2, Funny

      "No honey, it's a potato gun, not a bong."

      "What do you need it for?"

      "It's for protection. You want me to protect you, right?"

      "How does it work?"

      "You shove a potato in there and then some bolts and screws, and then fire it at the bad guy."

      "What if the bad guy has a REAL gun?"

      "Look honey, I made one for you too."

      --
      Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
    70. Re:a gun by psithurism · · Score: 2, Informative

      If violence didn't work, it's because you didn't use enough of it!

      I thought that was the rule for XML...

      It's a rule that can be applied with varying levels of effectiveness to most areas of life actually.

    71. Re:a gun by The+AtomicPunk · · Score: 2, Funny

      I carry a gun because a cop was too heavy!

    72. Re:a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meanwhile, the typical security system doesn't need to be walked twice a day (rain, snow, or sunshine), isn't going to shed on all of your clothing, and won't chew on your shoes.

      True... but you can't eat the "typical security system" Whenthe 2nd Great Depression hits.

      Go for the Gun Totin' DOG!

    73. Re:a gun by XSpud · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually, come to think of it, a well-trained dog is probably one of your better security options.

      A well-trained dog would be good, but I reckon having an un-house-trained dog would deter most unwelcome visitors.

    74. Re:a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean, trespassers will be violated?

    75. Re:a gun by nabsltd · · Score: 1

      So, if you cannot afford a big honkin' gun

      You definitely don't need a big honkin' gun, because the best home defense weapon is definitely the shortest shotgun that isn't legally considered "sawed-off".

      Or, you can use just about any handgun you want, just load it with the right ammunition.

    76. Re:a gun by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Of course you can always blow a hole in the ground deep enough to live in. Then blow up some trees around the base to make lumber after they fall and board up the entrance.

      Poof, problem solves, you now have a house again and this time, it's Eco-friendly.

    77. Re:a gun by castoridae · · Score: 1

      Wish I had mod points - I agree that a gun and a dog are tough to beat for home security!

    78. Re:a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Informative? "Meta"modding ftw.

    79. Re:a gun by Lev13than · · Score: 1

      Dogs are overrated. When my parent's place was robbed they found the back door shouldered in and their dog locked in a bedroom next to a snow shovel - they basically just shoveled the dog out of the way. Besides, all you need is a jar of peanut butter and any dog is your new best friend.

      If you buy a gun, the only person who is going to get shot is you, your spouse or one of your kids.

      As for alarm systems, all they're good for is to tell you what time your tv was stolen. Best solution is to keep your truly valuable stuff out of sight and your electronics backed up. Everything else can be replaced by insurance.

      --
      When you have nothing left to burn you must set yourself on fire
    80. Re:a gun by JDeane · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Dude... people can get past a dog. Nobody fucks with a lion."

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=seQsqfwd0ts&feature=related

    81. Re:a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No no no... BANG, bad guy falls to floor dead, you yell "That was your one and only warning, stay back from me and get out of my house" BANG, put another round in the wall. Problem solved

    82. Re:a gun by Maeslin · · Score: 1

      Long term breeding program for solifugae (camel spiders) or goliath birdeaters aimed at getting the largest breed possible. If possible, teach em to go for the face. And you thought big dogs scare thieves.

    83. Re:a gun by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Oh yes, like my dogs, who always bark when people leave but never when they come up the driveway. Great watchdogs. Or my grandparent's dog who was sitting happily in the middle of an empty room after their house got robbed.

      If your dog is well-trained, thieves usually have no problem shooting it (this is anecdotal evidence, I don't have statistics). It might give you an early warning if you're around during a home invasion, but so will an alarm system.

      --
      Qxe4
    84. Re:a gun by Architect_sasyr · · Score: 1

      Of course if you gas the guy and dispose of the body appropriately, you don't have to worry about that sort of "legal" thing ;)

      --
      Me failed English...
      FreeBSD over Linux. If my comments seem odd, this may explain...
    85. Re:a gun by gandhi_2 · · Score: 1

      Ahh. A household chemical fougasse.

    86. Re:a gun by ushering05401 · · Score: 1

      True. With the proper set up it could be better still to make sure he gets out safely with the loot.

    87. Re:a gun by Bodhammer · · Score: 1

      Pseudo-mod point!

      --
      "I say we take off, nuke the site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure."
    88. Re:a gun by AchilleTalon · · Score: 1

      Cool man! Fill your house with stolen stuff, so you don't bother if you get stolen.

      --
      Achille Talon
      Hop!
    89. Re:a gun by internettoughguy · · Score: 1

      Not to mention that insurance companies often give discounts if you have a security system in place.

    90. Re:a gun by DrugCheese · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure if parent meant to be moderated Funny or not but it's the truth. The only defense against someone with a gun sadly is your own gun. And make sure you know how to use it. If you're wanting to be secure, and not looking to just leave evidence behind to help solve your families murder. A gun is required.

      Or nunchaku and a good poker face

      --
      *DrugCheese rants*
    91. Re:a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, come to think of it, a well-trained dog is probably one of your better security options.

      Indeed ... especially if he's well-trained enough to use a gun.

      or not ... most intruders would leave when confronted with an angry dog with a gun... just to be safe

    92. Re:a gun by Danimoth · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If you're more of a cat person, I recommend a serval. An experienced robber will be used to a dog barking, but when they break into your house and hear a roar they are going out a whole lot faster than they came in.

      --
      No smoking sigs indoors.
    93. Re:a gun by w0mprat · · Score: 1

      Guns are more a false sense of security than any real form of protection. They are fundamentally an offensive weapon, not defensive, whoever gets it out first, wins.

      The U.S. doesn't have funatmentally lower rates of buglary, home invasion etc than countries with similar crime rate but lower gun ownership. Guns in homes is not much of a deterent, it just encourages criminals to be better equiped.

      Buglars frequently defeat canine security systems with... meat.

      --
      After logging in slashdot still does not take you back to the page you were on. It's been that way for 20 years.
    94. Re:a gun by w0mprat · · Score: 1

      Something that will shock Americans: Study found carrying a gun increased the risk to being more than four times more likely to be killed. When the victim had the chance to defend themselves, the odds of being shot were higher.

      http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn17922-carrying-a-gun-increases-risk-of-getting-shot-and-killed.html

      --
      After logging in slashdot still does not take you back to the page you were on. It's been that way for 20 years.
    95. Re:a gun by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      Then you just tell the cops "look for the guy who's going to be bright purple for the next few days - you can't miss him."

      That, of course, presupposes that the police could give a fuck about you and your stuff. Remember, most burglary cases remain unsolved. Your suggestion (while interesting) and the comments in favour of cameras rely entirely on the assumption that your security precautions have already failed.

      There are really only two options:
      (1) Make it hard (invonvenient, time-consuming or noisy) to get in, or
      (2) Be prepared to kill or maim the burglar.

      Option 2 has its attractions, but leaves you with a mess to clean up and/or lengthy discussions with your local constabulary.

    96. Re:a gun by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      ...then douse himself with a concentrated mix of bleach, ammonia and drain cleaner."

      Of course, having to bury your cats, dogs and goldfish afterwards wouldn't be much fun.

    97. Re:a gun by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      The U.S. doesn't have...lower rates of buglary

      I'm pleased to hear that. A burglar who sodomises his victims as well as robbing them would just be a bit much.

    98. Re:a gun by crispytwo · · Score: 1

      first you need a rocking chair, preferably wooden. The gun is optional.

    99. Re:a gun by mgblst · · Score: 2, Funny

      Stops handling it for christ's sake, and put it in the bin.

    100. Re:a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if that doesn't work - buy ammo as well.

    101. Re:a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We call 9mm instead 911.

    102. Re:a gun by Kymermosst · · Score: 1

      Wow. One study of one city had those results, and the article you linked to admits "While it may be that the type of people who carry firearms are simply more likely to get shot, it may be that guns give a sense of empowerment that causes carriers to overreact in tense situations, or encourages them to visit neighbourhoods they probably shouldn't"...

      Couldn't that be cultural? Maybe Philly residents are more cocky when they carry a gun, but that doesn't apply to say, residents of Boise, Idaho.

      It also goes on to say "We don't have an answer as to whether guns are protective or perilous"

      The study also did not identify whether or not those who died while carrying guns were involved in criminal activities (say... gangs/drugs), which would certainly increase their chances of being shot.

      --
      "Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives" should be a convenience store, not a government agency.
    103. Re:a gun by daveime · · Score: 0

      You betray your lack of understanding of simple economics

      I DO ??? I think you have it backwards.

      The insurance company takes the total amount of all expected claims (plus their markup) and divides it by the number of subscribers in the policy.

      This is how they can afford to pay out $50,000 bucks when your house gets cleaned out, even though you only paid a $500 policy fee. Or did you think they have a secret money tree ?

      It works only because they expect 1 in 100 people to actually claim. If everyone claimed, they'd be bankrupted.

      Ergo, YOU are being subsidized by 99 other people who WON'T claim, probably because they have a dog which is a great deterrent to the casual burglar.

      Like I said ... by not taking precautions to minimize the risk of being burgled because of your financial situation, you are pushing the load onto 99 other people who DO behave in a more responsible manner.

    104. Re:a gun by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      Nah, this guy just got ass fucked by lawyers a lot and wanted to turn things round a bit.

    105. Re:a gun by HopefulIntern · · Score: 1

      True. A burglar going from house to house scoping for stuff to steal will take one look at the dog and move on. He might just hear a bark, and then its a no-go. To a burglar, it is not worth his time and the risk if there is a dog, not when there are other houses without a dog.
      My partner and I recently adopted a (fairly) well trained GSD. Not only is he a fantastic pet/companion to both of us, but he is an excellent deterrent. He is not very aggressive, but his bark is loud and quite startling; the pizza guy ran for the hills one time when my dog got past me as I opened the door (he just wanted to say hi... lol).

    106. Re:a gun by HopefulIntern · · Score: 1

      While most of your points are valid (and I certainly agree that someone who does not really like dogs and just wants a cheap security guard should not buy a dog) I feel I should point out a few things:

      My GSD is not nearly as expensive as we had considered. He does not eat all that much (GSDs are quite lean, compared to other guard dog types such as rottweilers). I would say in a month I spend maybe £10 on food. Get a decent insurance policy on him/her and vet bills should be cheaper too (though this is the UK, the US might be different). He also doesn't need walking twice a day, as long as he gets his daily exercise. That is to say, we take him for a long walk with lots of playing fetch in the evening, which means he won't need a morning walk.

    107. Re:a gun by xaxa · · Score: 1

      Like I said ... by not taking precautions to minimize the risk of being burgled because of your financial situation, you are pushing the load onto 99 other people who DO behave in a more responsible manner.

      Except the insurance company asks all the appropriate questions (do you have an alarm, do you have a dog, do you have locks on all your windows, do you have ground-floor windows, how old are your door locks, etc, etc) and divides up the cost according to their assessment of the risk. They'll charge one household $200, another $500, and another $800.

    108. Re:a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're more of a cat person

      I CAN HAZ CHEEZBURGLAR?

    109. Re:a gun by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it is not like a burgler would never think to calm the dog (treats are wonderful; 'here boy' is used by most ppl to call their dog). And, it would never dawn on a burgler to simply KICK the dog to quiet it down.

      My Sister had two dogs at their place in Mesa, AZ. The first time their house was robbed, both dogs were in corners with broken ribs. The burglers simply kicked both of them. 1 week later, the 2 guys came back for more. That time, they were caught and simply deported to Mexico (though, I am sure that they are back; that is a messed up situation). I have to say, that I wish that they had simply used a gun on these 2 and been done with it.

      If you really want to be robbed, then do not make yourself the most attractive place in the area (do not be the big house in your place). In addition, put up a sign to say that you have a burgler alarm. Finally, put up an NRA sticker at all of your entrances. The burglers will go after easier prey. Think about Windows vs. Apple vs. Linux. Why is Windows broken into so often? BECAUSE IT IS EASIER. And it will continue until they are no more in the garbage heap on security. The same is true of your home. If you have the appearance of having lots of security, then they will skip your house and go to somebody easy. These guys want money and items. BTW, my sisters old home did not look expensive. It just looked easy (and it was). But, if an alarm is going to go off and the owners MAY have a gun, then you run the risk of being shot. It is not worth the risk for many crocks.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    110. Re:a gun by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Nah, not really. It's just good old fashioned ignorance rearing its ugly head.

      Guys like him have been around since Ug argued against trying to use fire for fear of angering the sun.

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
    111. Re:a gun by muckracer · · Score: 1

      > Actually, come to think of it, a well-trained dog is probably one of your better security options.

      Especially with a friggin' laser on its head...:-)

    112. Re:a gun by icebraining · · Score: 1

      That would be fun: if there's a fire in your apartment, not only you lose the stuff but you also get charged with manslaughter of a fireman!

    113. Re:a gun by imakemusic · · Score: 4, Funny

      And if that's not true you just need to apply it more.

      --
      Brain surgery - it's not rocket science!
    114. Re:a gun by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      So rather than pay for your own security, you prefer to let everyone else pay for it after your house has been robbed. How very philanthropic of you.

      You betray your lack of understanding of simple economics. The insurance company isn't interested in subsidizing you. They will charge (to the very best of their penny pinching knowledge) exactly what they expect to pay out in claims, to a person with similar income, living in a similar apartment, in a similar neighborhood -- plus a comfortable markup for their trouble.

      Actually, they can pay out more in claims and still make money - premiums represent a cash flow stream that can be invested; the profits from the investments can cover excess losses. That make sit advantageous to charge a little less and get more customers since you can make more money than if you exactly match premiums to losses plus desired profits.

      If you choose a homeowner's policy with a sensibly high deductible, then you're covered for catastrophic losses (the only really necessary role of insurance, for anyone with a shred of financial sense), but you're not on the hook for the (rather silly) folks who think that an insurance policy should protect them from anything and everything unfortunate that might ever happen to them. Not only that, by choosing such a sensible policy, you're also only sharing your risk with similarly sensible people.

      Here's where your understanding of economics is somewhat faulty. You present this as a financial, not economic, decision. Insurance is a classic case of information asymmetry.Insurance companies allow various deductibles to let the homeowner signal their understanding of the risks they face - a person who buys a low deductible policy signals a belief or behavior that makes a loss more likely and thus must pay a higher premium. Higher deductibles, with much lower premiums, encourages behaviors to limit risk. While some people may be very risk adverse or financially stupid; most can assess risks unknown to the insurer and chose an appropriate deductible.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    115. Re:a gun by imakemusic · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, no. He said "The U.S. doesn't have fun at mentally lower rates of buglary". Americans just love the sound of brass instruments - life's just no fun without them.

      --
      Brain surgery - it's not rocket science!
    116. Re:a gun by muckracer · · Score: 1

      > 2) motion-detection system with an alarm.
      > 3) A dog would work in the same way, but that's a lot of upkeep.

      I'd imagine, these two are mutually exclusive anyway, unless they cover completely separate areas.

    117. Re:a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, come to think of it, a well-trained dog is probably one of your better security options.

      Indeed ... especially if he's well-trained enough to use a gun.

      Dog uses Mace, not guns. :-P

    118. Re:a gun by muckracer · · Score: 1

      > a sticker on the window with a picture of a gun and the text "Never mind the dog -- beware of owner!"

      Sounds cute 'n all, but as far as I am concerned it's irresponsible, dangerous or at least rather foolish, gun ownership. IMHO you do not advertise to anyone that you have a gun (or not). Keep people guessing. I don't believe, that it really serves as a deterrent if implemented as above. Whereas the *unexpected* 12-gauge pump actions certainly will.

    119. Re:a gun by Rhaban · · Score: 1

      A "Beware of the dog" sign may have the same effect for a much lower price.

    120. Re:a gun by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 1

      Guns are more a false sense of security than any real form of protection.

      Holy fucking Whoosh Batman.

      Buglars frequently defeat canine security systems with... meat.

      A canine with a gun will take your meat ... at gunpoint.

      Look, I realize that the best security system is a moat filled lava and lava resistant sharks. But who has time to synthesize the DNA required to crossbreed giant armadillos with prehistoric capybara to feed to them? Sure, airborne attacks are a real possibility too, so while I'm at it I'll just brew up a hybrid spider/snapping turtle that can handle the rooftop assaults. Anything else while I've got Dr. Moreau pinned under a chair?

    121. Re:a gun by Ihlosi · · Score: 1
      A "Beware of the dog" sign may have the same effect for a much lower price.

      Actually, we found that s "Beware of the bees" sign (with a couple of hives in the back yard) had a much higher deterrent value than a "Beware of the dog." sign.

      Most people can gauge the danger of dog, but they have zero clue about bees.

    122. Re:a gun by Rhaban · · Score: 1

      Interesting.

    123. Re:a gun by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      1. The purpose of a gun is to hopefully never have to use it. 2. If the burglar thinks you are a crazy gun totin' NRA type, they will pick an easier target.

      Most burglaries are crimes of opportunity, not heavy planned. The best defense is simply giving them a reason to pick a different target, and you might be shocked at how easy and effective a sign of a gun can be.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    124. Re:a gun by daveime · · Score: 1

      Yes, well played ... you pay more because your risk is higher than other members of your group ... and you are MORE likely to make a claim i.e. more likely to ask the other members of the group to all chip in to solve your problem.

    125. Re:a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmmm... so, don't buy a dog, buy a motion sensor and have it trigger a recording of a dog barking, thus fooling the stupid criminals and avoiding the hassle and expense of a real dog.

    126. Re:a gun by muckracer · · Score: 1

      > Most burglaries are crimes of opportunity, not heavy planned. The best defense is simply giving them a reason to pick a different target,
      > and you might be shocked at how easy and effective a sign of a gun can be.

      Well, that might be true. And I am all for methods, incl. deception (like putting up stickers from a security company, even though you may not have one in reality), that might help deter a burglary in the first place. But still I don't think flashing your status regarding weapons is overall good. Sure it might work for some. But might escalate methods with other's. Besides...is a target where the home owner is present one of 'opportunity'?

    127. Re:a gun by JockTroll · · Score: 0

      Typical loserboy mindset. I'm weak, I'm pathetic, I cannot win, I cannot do anything, waaah. And EVERYONE MUST BE LIKE ME.

      Guess what, weakling, it's not the case. Only because you are worth nothing more than shit smeared on the pavement, it's not like the rest of the world must be made up of sorry excuses for a waste of O2.

      Anyone who has half a wit and is serious about protecting their property, wise up: there is nothing like a single security system, security comes in layers. It comes from knowing the territory you live in, knowing your neighbours (if they're like-minded, check with the autorithies and organize a neighbourhood watch so you'll all be aware if someone's reconnoitering your area). It comes with strong doors and locks: the longer the opponent has to work on entry, the more likely he's going somewhere else.

      You need more than one security system, the louder the better, and with enough battery power should the bad guys cut the wire. Do not underestimate the psychological effect, unless you're up with hardened criminals the loud sound and flashing lights (yes, throw POWERFUL lights in) will convince them it's better not to risk.

      Dogs are good company, but if you're relying on your dogs to deter the intruders you're living in the past. Moreover, anyone who uses his pet as an expendable deterrent deserves to be robbed.

      Footage of the burglars stealing your stuff will be irrelevant to the police, because quite frankly they've got tougher nuts to crack than recovering your shit which should have been insured anyway.

      You have to put as many time- and resource-consuming obstacles between the bad guys and your stuff - and yourself come to it. You need an always-ready cellphone, with speed-dial set to 911 or the local equivalent, ambulance and fire department because in the heat of the moment you can't count on yourself being able to remember or, in the case of injury dial in, the whole number even if it's just 3 digits.

      You want a safe room, reinforced, last line of defence if you're home and the bad guys break in. That's what the alarm system should be about first and foremost - alerting YOU so that you'll have enough time to barricade in and call for help.

      Guns are good as the very last line of defence, should the bad guys break in your safe room. Again, disregard any shit about "it will only be used against you" or other nonsense. It's the equivalent of "you shouldn't own a car, you'll run over someone with it". It's the typical loserboy condescendence to which the answer should be: "you shouldn't own a computer, it will become part of a botnet". But don't get a firearm if you're not prepared to use it and if you're not serious about training. And when you're not home your weapons go into a safe, wall-mounted, and the ammo in another safe.

      That's it if you're serious. Anyone else who share the loserboy's opinions, get buggered with a piece of rebar and drown yourself in a pool of your own vomit and feces while we shit on your face.

      --
      Geeks are so full of shit that "beating the crap out of them" takes a whole new meaning.
    128. Re:a gun by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      If violence didn't work, it's because you didn't use enough of it!

      And it's probably now too late because you're dead. If you use excessive violence, you'd better make sure you win.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    129. Re:a gun by Malc · · Score: 1

      A gaggle of geese might be a better option. Have you heard the racket they make?

    130. Re:a gun by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      It really depends on if the thief wants to break into a house or if they want to break into your house specifically. Dogs are like thorn bushes under your windows...they won't stop someone who really wants in, but they can be enough of a deterrent to convince someone less motivated to rob someone else instead.

      That's why I always break one of my neighbour's windows when I go out.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    131. Re:a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, come to think of it, a well-trained dog is probably one of your better security options.

      Indeed ... especially if he's well-trained enough to use a gun.

      Some sort of gun-dog, then?

    132. Re:a gun by flyneye · · Score: 1

      Remember a shotgun and .45 cal are great for home protection because they are less likely to travel through outside walls, when fired and put amazing impact on the primary target.
      On a side note, Chas. Bronsons "Death Wish IV" had some nice recipes for home protection to compliment firearms....

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    133. Re:a gun by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

      A sufficiently large dog bowl with the word "Killer" stenciled on it may be a lower-maintenance option for those who do not want a pet.

      Put it on the porch, and the only maintenance is to make sure there's no dust or cobwebs on it. Depending on one's apartment design, this is feasible or not.

    134. Re:a gun by jijacob · · Score: 1

      You're always gonna have problems lifting a body in one piece. Apparently the best thing to do is cut up a corpse into six pieces and pile it all together. And when you got your six pieces, you gotta get rid of them, because it's no good leaving it in the deep freeze for your mum to discover, now is it? Then I hear the best thing to do is feed them to pigs. You got to starve the pigs for a few days, then the sight of a chopped-up body will look like curry to a pisshead. You gotta shave the heads of your victims, and pull the teeth out for the sake of the piggies' digestion. You could do this afterwards, of course, but you don't want to go sievin' through pig shit, now do you? They will go through bone like butter. You need at least sixteen pigs to finish the job in one sitting, so be wary of any man who keeps a pig farm. They will go through a body that weighs 200 pounds in about eight minutes. That means that a single pig can consume two pounds of uncooked flesh every minute. Hence the expression, "as greedy as a pig".

    135. Re:a gun by datapharmer · · Score: 1

      Eco-friendly?

      I don't think that word means what you think it means...

      --
      Get a web developer
    136. Re:a gun by KillaBeave · · Score: 4, Interesting

      A friend of mine back home (rural Indiana) had an interesting take on the "we don't call 911" home security strategy.

      A few years ago 3-4 of his neighbors houses had been broken into and robbed in a short period of time. My friend, a gun enthusiast who loves shooting at the range and does so at least once a week, decided there was no better deterrent than hanging one of his used silhouette targets up on the back door.

      The ragged holes in the head and chest said all that needed to be said ... and his house was never broken into. :)

    137. Re:a gun by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

      If the burglar thinks you are a crazy gun totin' NRA type, they will pick an easier target.

      Or they'll think you have lots of guns that they'd like to steal, so they just come in a large, heavily armed group.

      'Untraceable' guns are quite valuable to criminals.

    138. Re:a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck me. Don't you like colloquialisms?

      I'm confused. Are you aroused?

    139. Re:a gun by AltairDusk · · Score: 1

      If you buy a gun, the only person who is going to get shot is you, your spouse or one of your kids.

      Just because you can't properly handle a firearm doesn't mean others can't. You don't just buy a gun and put it in the nightstand then call it a day, responsible ownership involves regular practice at the range to ensure your aim is good and proper storage. There are fingerprint and combination pistol safes available that can have that gun in your hand and ready to go in a matter of a few seconds. If you're not awake enough to get the gun out of the safe you're still too groggy to be using the gun.

    140. Re:a gun by Abstrackt · · Score: 1

      It goes beyond knowing how to use it, you also require willingness to use it. Unfortunately, that's the main difference between criminals with guns and homeowners with guns.

      I'm sure several people will respond that they're willing to shoot someone but having been taught not to aim at something I don't want dead, I can tell you that it's extremely difficult to point a gun at another human, let alone shoot at them.

      --
      They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett
    141. Re:a gun by CubicleView · · Score: 1

      Someone blowing up your house is only a problem for you. So applying explosives directly to you should make the problem go away.

    142. Re:a gun by jamesh · · Score: 1

      That, of course, presupposes that the police could give a fuck about you and your stuff. Remember, most burglary cases remain unsolved.

      The police have a job to do, and i'm guessing that one of their KPI's is going to be catching bad guys. If they have to come to your house, dust for prints (ha!), then spend weeks following leads trying to catch someone, then do a whole stack of paperwork, then haul the guy (assuming they catch him) up in front of a judge only to have the judge let the guy go on the condition he tries really hard not to do it again, then i don't really blame them for not being that interested, especially when your missing stuff is a whole lot less important than the majority of crimes that happen. "Yes Mrs Smith, I understand that the assault on your grandmother was terrible but right now we're working on getting BrokenHalo's Celine Dion CD back"...

      On the other hand, if you have your stuff properly labeled, can give them a clear picture of the guy, and have painted the guy purple[1], then you might be in with a chance if he's known to them. A relatively unimportant crime but with a higher chance of getting a result has to count for something.

      Making your house harder to break in to and not getting burgled in the first place might work too. Or just move next door to someone who obviously has more stuff worth stealing, and make sure you leave the empty boxes from your appliances outside their house, not yours.

      [1] Just prepare for when Mr Purple's lawyers come knocking...

    143. Re:a gun by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      That doesn't even make sense. I have several guns, and they are all traceable because I bought them legally. Most people who have multiple guns bought them legally. This means a background check via paperwork filed by the seller, with an FFL license, and in the case of hand guns, via a hand gun permit issued locally, all of which have the serial numbers. Large gangs breaking into a home to get guns is almost unheard of. They might hit a pawnshop or gun store, but not an individual's house. The majority of the 300 million guns in the US can be accounted for by paperwork filed with the Fed ATF, including the guns I have owned for over 20 years. Are there guns out there not listed? Sure, but they are the exception not the rule (or same owner for several decades). Even before the Brady Bill, you still had to fill out a yellow sheet for hand guns.

      Of course, this is based on my limited experience owning and managing pawn shops, being a licensed gun dealer AND being a former defense private investigator....

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    144. Re:a gun by oldspewey · · Score: 1

      Option 2 also assumes:

      1. You are willing to stay home 24/7 with a cocked, loaded gun waiting to hear the floorboards creak. Some people do things like go out to work or to catch a ballgame.
      2. Your value system is such that you believe material possessions are worth risking your life over, by confronting a completely unknown individual in a violent manner.
      --
      If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
    145. Re:a gun by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      Besides...is a target where the home owner is present one of 'opportunity'?

      All it usually takes is instilling "doubt" in a criminal's mind. (ie: FUD) If there is a home neighborhood full of homes, then a criminal is more likely to move on "just in case they are home". Most burglaries just happen that way, even if they have the intention of stealing some stuff, they don't preplan other than picking an area, and hitting what looks easy. If they plan at all. Criminals are lazy. Most don't travel very far, as the majority of burglaries happen within a few miles of the perp's house. The reality is, a barking dog does more to scare off a burglar more than anything else. A potential "nutty gun toting" homeowner is almost as good.

      Keep in mind, we are talking about BURGLARY, not robbery. Burglars are cowards, non-confrontational thieves. Like shoplifting taken to the next level, and almost always unarmed (excepting maybe a blade). Robbery is a completely different crime, by completely different criminal types, confrontational and aggressive. Burglars will run away, robbers are more likely to shoot you, even if only out of fear.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    146. Re:a gun by jamesh · · Score: 1

      Or just the sound of a dog barking triggered by motion sensors when someone enters the immediate perimeter of the house. Assuming an opportunistic crime, the burglar is most likely prepared to walk away and look for somewhere else to break in to if there is any hint of trouble.

      We've got a few motion triggered lights around the outside of the house... it's more a convenience thing than a security thing, but if I was approaching a house at night with the intention of checking the door to see if anyone was home and then trying to break in and a light came on i'd turn around and try somewhere else instead.

      It's not going to stop a determined crook who's done his homework and knows that i've got motion sensor lights, but then i've got nothing worth stealing anyway. If I ever get burgled by anyone really determined I just hope it happens when myself and the family aren't home.

    147. Re:a gun by bkaul01 · · Score: 1

      Considering that the majority of burglaries are by druggies looking for something they can easily sell for cash to get their next hit, just making your place a little less attractive than the place next door might be all you need to do. A dog does quite well there.

    148. Re:a gun by confused+one · · Score: 1

      They wouldn't have survived the Claymore blast either. Well, maybe the cat would (nine lives and all).

    149. Re:a gun by g253 · · Score: 1

      And that's how this discussion, like the previous one on the same topic, ends up having a shitload of comments about guns, safety, laws, and nothing that comes even close to actually trying to answer the questions. Sigh.

    150. Re:a gun by archmcd · · Score: 3, Informative

      Really? I notice you didn't back up your claim with sources, but anti-gun "pundits" often cite that same "fact" but with some major flaws. First of all, gun ownership in the United States is not as ubiquitous as these "pundits" want you to believe. Please note, too, that the areas with the highest crime rates in the United States, especially home invasion and burglary, are areas that have instituted HANDGUN BANS (Like Chicago, New York City, Washington DC, Baltimore, most of California), yet their crime statistics are still lumped in every single time this argument is made.

      You also made the assertion that legal gun ownership is not a 'deterrent', as it "encourages criminals to be better equipped." REALLY!? Criminals do not want a challenge. If a criminal knows they have a pretty good chance of going up against a paranoid citizen with a gun strapped to his mattress, they're likely to strike elsewhere. They do not want to go into a gunfight, no matter how well equipped they are. If that means going 2 miles away into the city where there's a gun ban, and curiously higher rates of home invasions (not making a causality error here, as they often have an overtasked police department as well), they will do it. There are plenty of low hanging apples for them to pick, such as the house just across the border in which the occupant frequently leaves her bedroom window open and sleeps in nothing but a lacy black thong.

      Next you claim that "burglars frequently defeat canine security systems with... meat." Sounds like you watch too many cartoons. A home invader is more likely to find a different target if the one they were initially going to invade would have them encountering a big ass dog. The bottom line is, anything that may present a challenge to a home invader is a deterrent, be it a dog, guns, locked doors, an alarm system, surveillance cameras, security glass, thorn bushes beneath windows and adequate lighting. Also, gun ownership is a responsibility that can't be taken lightly, and responsible care for the weapon means ensuring it doesn't get into the wrong hands, yet is available when you need it.

      --
      I'm not an expert, but I play one on slashdot.
    151. Re:a gun by Abstrackt · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Why was this marked insightful? It should be funny. I don't have any points to do that. :(

      Funny doesn't give karma so mods will sometimes mod a post insightful/interesting/informative as a courtesy. There's also the possibility a mod thought it was an insightful joke.

      --
      They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett
    152. Re:a gun by Kizeh · · Score: 1

      Here, based on police radio before they went all digital, it seemed to be one officer. And they were low priority calls, so it would take them a while to get there because they'd be busy responding to traffic accidents, backup requests etc.

    153. Re:a gun by Demonantis · · Score: 2, Funny

      Get a rabbit. I have seen one of those bite heads off.

    154. Re:a gun by archmcd · · Score: 1

      It's all relative to the homes around you. I can confidently say my home is secure without elaborating on the methods of security, as I live in a neighborhood where NONE of my neighbors lock their doors or windows. They won't dare chance crossing my tank of frickin' sharks with frickin' laser beams attached to their frickin' heads, when they can invade my neighbor's house with no effort.

      --
      I'm not an expert, but I play one on slashdot.
    155. Re:a gun by Charliemopps · · Score: 1

      Get an old 12 gauge. You don't need to actually shoot the intruder. When you hear someone breaking in, aim it at something not all that valuable and set it off... They'll leave, trust me. Anyone else that's heard a shotgun go off indoors will be able to confirm the affect. Then all you have to do is fix the whole in the wall and change your underwear.

    156. Re:a gun by Terribliz · · Score: 1

      NEVER call the police: http://bit.ly/dpr8Y2

    157. Re:a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Voluntary..!? Have you tried getting a mortgage with no homeowners insurance lately? Or renewing a car registration with no auto insurance?

    158. Re:a gun by gotpoetry · · Score: 1

      Burglar alarm sign => "They have expensive stuff, but we'll have to be quick!"

      NRA Stickers => "They have guns, lets steal them guns!"

      Once a thief sees you leave and knows your house is empty, they will break in if they want to. I suggest making it look like you don't have anything worth stealing.

    159. Re:a gun by eth1 · · Score: 1

      Just flood the house with nitrogen while you're gone. As a bonus, you get increased fire resistance, and a good dose of plausible deniability when the cops show up after you call them because of the dead bodies you found!

    160. Re:a gun by MirthScout · · Score: 1

      You just have to adjust your definition of human. If it isn't acting with humanity, i.e. with regard for others and their property, then, at least at that time, it isn't human.

    161. Re:a gun by Lev13than · · Score: 1

      Not to get into a pissing match, but like most people who have served I have a significantly more firearms training than 90% of the population. It's also given me a healthy respect for the risks of spending 24/7 around loaded weapons.
      The only situation where a weapon is useful is against an aggressive home invasion, which is vanishingly rare. Anything else is better solved with non-lethal options. A gun introduces way too many variables to the equation, and dramatically increases the chance of a bad outcome - for you.

      --
      When you have nothing left to burn you must set yourself on fire
    162. Re:a gun by Lev13than · · Score: 1

      Sounds like you live in a self-built prison (both physically and mentally). I'd rather accept that there's a slight chance of my tv getting stolen than live in a state of constant paranoia. I'm not a weakling, I just have better things to do with my time.

      --
      When you have nothing left to burn you must set yourself on fire
    163. Re:a gun by someCoward112 · · Score: 1

      That cop was talking about catching burglars. I only care about deterring them or scaring them off in the middle of a break in. We have the heavily advertised Broadview service, and yes, it did work as promised. Somebody forced a window, walked into the dining room, tripped the motion sensor and ran away at the sound of the alarms. Cops showed up 10 minutes later to an empty house. Which was fine by me. I'm just glad that nothing got stolen. Would it be better if the crook was caught? Probably, but that is a bonus.

    164. Re:a gun by nmg196 · · Score: 1

      > Actually, come to think of it, a well-trained dog is probably one of your better security options.

      RTFA. This thread is about *home* security for which dogs are almost useless. A dog is always with you, so whenever you're not there your dog won't be either. You can't leave your dog at home while you go on vacation. That's not much help if someone tries to break in when you're out (which is kinda the norm for burglars in most cases).

    165. Re:a gun by eth1 · · Score: 1

      But were they not catching burglars because the alarms were ineffective, or because the burglars avoided alarmed houses or ran as soon as the alarm went off (which might have ended up in the "false alarm" category).

      FWIW, I listen to my local police radio constantly, and can't remember them ever catching anyone on an alarm call, either.

    166. Re:a gun by Idarubicin · · Score: 1

      Voluntary..!? Have you tried getting a mortgage with no homeowners insurance lately? Or renewing a car registration with no auto insurance?

      Have you tried buying a house using only your own money, rather than money that you're borrowing from someone else? It turns out that when someone lends you a few hundred thousand dollars, there are often strings attached. If you actually owned your home outright, you'd be free to not insure it.

      As for auto insurance, you're welcome to drive your car about on your own property whenever and however you'd like -- no license, registration, or insurance required. You are only required to buy insurance when you head out onto roads that are paid for by and shared with other people.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    167. Re:a gun by Nick+Number · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, most burglars are too lazy to think that far ahead.

      I mean, it takes a lot of effort to come up with a plan bee.

      --
      Promote proofreading. Don't mod up sloppy posts.
    168. Re:a gun by still+cynical · · Score: 1

      Until someone steals the dog.

      --
      Ignorance is the root of all evil.
    169. Re:a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When my parent's place was robbed...

      Why don't you say mother's or father's?

      Or did you actually mean parents'?

    170. Re:a gun by Captain+Centropyge · · Score: 1

      But not everything can be replaced by an insurance policy. Perhaps the OP has items with sentimental value that they would like to protect, rather than just replace with insurance money. For most things, insurance claims work just fine. But insurance doesn't work for everything.

      --
      Bite my shiny metal ass!
    171. Re:a gun by SleazyRidr · · Score: 1

      The U.S. doesn't have funatmentally lower rates of buglary, home invasion etc than countries with similar crime rate

      So the US has a similar crime as other countries with a similar crime rate?

    172. Re:a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anybody can get by a dog, bro. But NOBODY fucks with a lion! Right, Doctor?

    173. Re:a gun by SleazyRidr · · Score: 1

      I could link you to a video that gives you something more entertaining to do with the excrement, but I'm at work, and I can't imagine the looks I'd get.

    174. Re:a gun by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      My parents had a Siberian Husky/Chow cross, and he Chirped more then barked, I suppose that came from the Chow side? Quite an annoying noise that goes right through your head.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    175. Re:a gun by Abstrackt · · Score: 1

      I can't think of a less blunt way to say this, sorry.

      Have you ever pointed a gun at someone? If you (as in anyone) are capable of shutting off what makes you recognize someone as human so easily and so immediately (in the scope of defending your home) you are either a sociopath or a soldier.

      --
      They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett
    176. Re:a gun by SoothingMist · · Score: 1

      Once all the laughter dies down: Consider an active component to home security. Just having cameras is not sufficient. Use a simple frame-to-frame change detector coupled to automated email. The email should send basic information in text accompanied by an image or two. If a microphone is attached, a wave file can also be sent. Going further, real-time remote monitoring could be enabled. Be sure to be subtle. Don't put cameras and microphones in obvious places.

    177. Re:a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you ask your puppy why his kisses taste like a dog's ass, his puppy reply, properly translated, would be "because I've just been licking another dog's ass; I'm a dog, that's what I do". I thought I'd been lonely on occasion, but I've never been that desperate.

    178. Re:a gun by JockTroll · · Score: 0

      Lol, a prison is made to keep people IN, not OUT. Of course, it's probably too much for your feeble mind to understand, you burger-flipper school dropout.

      Having strong - but not overbearing - security at home is liberating. I don't have to worry about my stuff, and I don't have to worry about myself or my family when we're home. Nobody has to live in a state of constant paranoia because, hear hear, preparations have been made.

      So, what are you doing with your time? What are those "better things"? Jerking off to hentai videos?

      --
      Geeks are so full of shit that "beating the crap out of them" takes a whole new meaning.
    179. Re:a gun by Cid+Highwind · · Score: 1

      No, and since puppy kisses make me break out in hives, that's another point in favor of the security system... ...or a gun, or high explosives, or steel bear traps, or a pointy-teethed attack-bunny, or really anything except a dog.

      --
      0 1 - just my two bits
    180. Re:a gun by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      If you live in a nice neighborhood, then you can not win the approach that you spoke of. The fact is, that around my last neighborhood (saudi aurora, Colorado) and at my current one (highlands ranch,co), the only homes that I knew were broken into, had no burgler alarm signs. And around here, most ppl have a gun anyways. Also, the cops come quickly in nicer areas when an alarm goes off. Much quicker.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    181. Re:a gun by geekoid · · Score: 1

      OTOH, no security system has ever attracted women.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    182. Re:a gun by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "the only really necessary role of insurance, for anyone with a shred of financial sense)"

      I am the father of a family of four. If I followed the 'advice' I would be out substantial sums of money every year, far more then I pay. Routing DR appointments would have cost me more then I pay in insurances.

      As anyone with ACTUAL financial sense knows, it's about risk. The risk that we will go to a doctor several times a year is 100%. IT will happen, and at least 8 times. usually more. Weigh that cost against the premium cost.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    183. Re:a gun by geekoid · · Score: 1

      The requirements where for security. A dog is the best option.

      You want a security system that doesn't shit? should have said so.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    184. Re:a gun by alexo · · Score: 1

      If you ask your puppy why his kisses taste like a dog's ass, his puppy reply, properly translated, would be "How the hell do you know what a dog's ass tastes like???"

      FTFY.

    185. Re:a gun by geekoid · · Score: 1

      You can run over 18 to 24 MPG? Shit, that's about a 2 minute mile.

      If someone has a high enough need to get a specific thing that only you have, then no security system is going to work 100%. However, since most crimes are casual attacks of opportunity you post is really not worth a damn.

      out run a rottwieller... I'd like to see that.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    186. Re:a gun by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Get your family out and leave. If the burgler is prepared to deal with a dog, there probably prepared to deal with you. And while it's cool to think of grabbing a gun, you really don't want a fire fight in a house your family is in if you can help it. Get out, call the police wait someplace safe and observe. If you can't get your family out, then make your presence known by telling them you have a gun and yelling for your family to get down. Maximize your safety. Remember, even well trained people are more likely to miss then hit.

      He isn't going to be working for railroad to try and take your land. He will get what he came for and leave. Hopefully you can mange to to observe him leaving.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    187. Re:a gun by SnarfQuest · · Score: 1

      the cost of dog food is probably comparable to most security system monitoring charges.

      If you place something really sparkly in your window, your "dog food" will arrive on it's own. Or, you can just get people drunk and feed him their toes.

      --
      Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
    188. Re:a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +5 on troll skills, but your argument is still shit.

    189. Re:a gun by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Maintenance costs for an ordinary healthy medium-sized dog is about $300/year, with typically about a $500 to $1000 "setup fee" (purchase price for a common purebred, tho freebies are easy enough to come by). I don't know how that compares to security monitor charges.

      But having had both, I can attest that the dog, even with any special training, will be both far more flexible and vastly more accurate at threat assessment. AND it's a lot scarier to perps. Plus the dog can get 'em on the spot; the security monitor involves a considerable response time.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    190. Re:a gun by downhole · · Score: 1

      That's why a dog and a gun is best. The dog will scare away 95% of the bad guys, and for the rest, it will alert you and delay the bad guy long enough to grab your gun and get to him.

      --
      I don't reply to ACs
    191. Re:a gun by Reziac · · Score: 1

      A good Rottweiler can seriously outrun a Doberman, and is a lot tougher to discourage once it's decided you're a perp (a Dobe might lose interest; a Rott, never). You might want to revise your burglary plans accordingly. ;)

      Actually, the very best guard dog is a Chesapeake Bay Retriever. They have a sense of ownership that includes property and boundaries, they never forget anyone (if you once tried to break in the back door, you can forget about coming in the front door a year later even if you knock politely and the owner invites you in), and they won't grow bored waiting 8 hours for the owner to come home, as the dog keeps you pinned against the nearest solid wall.

      Old-type fieldbred Labradors are almost as good.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    192. Re:a gun by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      And education is always expensive anyway. Whether your paying an instructor, or trashing raw materials on your way to understanding, you've got to pay for understanding and insight.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    193. Re:a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A gun protects your life but not your property. Also the rules regarding your right to shoot an intruder vary greatly between locations so it is hard to recommend a gun in this case as a solution for property protection. Lastly if the gun doesn't work the solution is NOT more gun, but is more practice. Buying a bigger scarier gun will do nothing for you if you can't shoot it worth a crap.

      For security I guess the solution really depends on your intent. Also I saw the word "Apartment" so I am assuming there is one primary entry and then windows beyond that.
      -If you never want your stuff stolen the best I can say is bulletproof lockable windows, and a steel door with multiple deadbolts. Also anything really valuable should be in a safe that is bolted down, preferably into concrete.
      -If you want to catch who stole your stuff, a webcam attached to a PC can record for hours and requires little hardware cost and space. Just aim the thing at the entry door and put it, along with the PC running it in a concealed place. Additional webcams could be aimed at windows that may be easy to break into.
      -If you want to be alerted to entry while you are away, well now you are getting complicated and maybe look for some motion sensing software for that webcam and pair it with some software to email your smartphone on certain alerts. Also video recognition is getting pretty good so it could probably distinguish between a person and a falling plant.

    194. Re:a gun by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but I can afford more hookers there.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    195. Re:a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Robert William Pickton, is that you?

    196. Re:a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes but will your fancy 'lectonix give you puppy kisses when you are feeling blue???

      Damn right! Dogs are the best thing in the world!

    197. Re:a gun by b4dc0d3r · · Score: 1

      I'm still thinking you're backwards. You claim it's a subsidy, but that word doesn't make sense here. People who want to have their homes insured pay into the system, hoping they won't have to make a claim. You don't buy insurance and hope your house burns down, or that someone steals your valuables along with the otherwise value-less information in your wallet or other places. The benefit you get is knowing that if something catastrophic happens you don't have to replace your house yourself. There's no subsidy here - no government grant and nothing required.

      You want to take the meaning that your policy is more expensive because of what other people do.

      So rather than pay for your own security, you prefer to let everyone else pay for it after your house has been robbed. How very philanthropic of you.

      Everyone else is not paying for anything. They contributed to a system that they can likewise benefit from if needed. You aren't spending their money, you're spending the middleman's money. And the middleman asks you if you're protecting your house, if they are any decent sort of middleman, on behalf of everyone else who puts money in. The insurance company physically checked out my house before telling the lender they would insure it, and they accepted the risk. Everyone else has already paid to secure their place in the system, not bail you out.

      The insurance company takes the total amount of all expected claims (plus their markup) and divides it by the number of subscribers in the policy.

      To come up with what number? The premium I assume? That would only work if they re-evaluated everyone's policy cost every time they added a new policy holder. Your explanation is an inelegant and naive idea of how they might gauge the policy amount, but is hardly the way it works. In reality, they look at the average cost of houses and goods owned, subdivided into brackets into which you fall. Your home value in your neighborhood means you likely own a certain value of items which must be insured. And the value of the home itself of course. The number of break-ins for the bracket goes into the calculation, the number of total loss home destructions, all kinds of variables, and they come up with the total cost of policyholders in that bracket. Isn't this the same thing that you said? No, it's not. If an insurance company has huge reserves, it will underwrite the policy itself. Otherwise, it will take your policy as operating revenue and essentially insure your policy with another company's backing. That's why you see advertisements for insurance that says it is underwritten by or backed by or some other relationship with a large company.

      To repeat myself: the insurance company does not take a big number and divide by the policyholders, or else you wouldn't have an insurance company backed by someone else. The insurance company estimates how much it will cost to pay a claim on your house, and statistically speaking since it's not likely they will have to, the cost is less than the value of the home and its contents.

      In theory, you could simply pay the insurance company a one-time fee over a certain number of years, instead of a monthly premium. If your assumptions were correct. Divide the likelihood of replacement over a number of years, multiply by the average replacement cost, you have a number. But we might move, or change things about the house, and we don't have all of the money up front. So they charge way less than they might otherwise, because they have a large number of people paying in. Liquid in, liquid out, and invest the rest as free money to multiply earnings. True insurance companies (not the fronts that are underwritten by someone else) aren't in the business of insurance, they are in the business of holding money and watching it grow.

      And, we're talking about homeowner's insurance in a security thread. Unless you keep collector's items like coins or stamps or comic books,

    198. Re:a gun by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      Her dogs are either too small or too timid.

    199. Re:a gun by MrNiceguy_KS · · Score: 1

      This is /. Don't ever apologize for a Discworld reference.

      --
      Redundancy is good And also good.
    200. Re:a gun by Carnildo · · Score: 1

      Voluntary..!? Have you tried getting a mortgage with no homeowners insurance lately? Or renewing a car registration with no auto insurance?

      You can buy a house with no homeowners' insurance. It's only if you're making the purchase with somebody else's money that you need insurance -- if the house burns down, they want to be sure they can still get their money back.

      Likewise, the only required auto insurance is liability insurance for registered vehicles: if you are driving a vehicle on public roads, the public requires you to be able to pay for any damage you cause. You can self-insure by setting aside a certain amount of money, but most people either don't have that much cash on hand, or don't want to go to the effort involved. You can avoid the insurance issue entirely by never driving off private property.

      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
    201. Re:a gun by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      It was meant as a joke. The word means what I think it means, I just used it in an abstract way like blowing a hole in the ground to solve the problem of someone else blowing your house up.

    202. Re:a gun by JockTroll · · Score: 0

      And you're a failure, typical slashdot loserboy. It takes very little time (maybe a fucking week of your worthless life) to get most of the stuff I have described done. Firearms training takes longer, but it's worth it. I suppose you'll never take a first-aid course, either, or learn to use a fire extinguisher because "anyway, there's nothing you can do yadda yadda". While you let your pitiful unworthy life being fully controlled by random fate or by the mercy of others, real people take all the steps necessary to have a minimum of mastery over it, and that gives us the peace of mind to carry on with our lives without worrying about getting our stuff stolen or burned. There's always a possibility it will happen, but we have REDUCED it.
      Meanwhile you have given up, you surrendered, you accepted the mastery of fate over the filthy mound of bovine excrement that is your existence. Instead of breathing in the fresh air of confidence that comes with having done the best you could to be prepared, your lungs are full of the accumulated putrid smell of ancient farts that linger in the Cave of Lost Loserboys.
      Take your defeatist and defeated attitude and begone! Return to your hole in the ground and trouble these fair lands no more! By the power of the Jock I banish you to the Underland of Smelly Doom where there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth under the eternal rain of human shit.

      --
      Geeks are so full of shit that "beating the crap out of them" takes a whole new meaning.
    203. Re:a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For lunch, I want either cheese sandwiches, or apricot sandwiches. Which should i have, and how will explosives help me reach this decision?

    204. Re:a gun by shiftless · · Score: 1

      No, insurance will cover your house. Suitable application of high explosives can certainly solve the nut who did it. It's easy to dispose of a bomb maker and disguise it as a suicide/accident; I mean who would really ask questions if one of "his" creations underneath his workbench "accidently" exploded?

    205. Re:a gun by shiftless · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it is not like a burgler would never think to calm the dog (treats are wonderful; 'here boy' is used by most ppl to call their dog). And, it would never dawn on a burgler to simply KICK the dog to quiet it down. My Sister had two dogs at their place in Mesa, AZ. The first time their house was robbed, both dogs were in corners with broken ribs. The burglers simply kicked both of them.

      Yeah, try that with a well trained Rottweiler, German Shepherd, etc and see what happens. You think a security-minded dog is going to automatically trust you and let you bust in and do whatever you please just because you bring him a steak? You can train and raise up a dog to automatically kill anybody who tries to enter an area, or never to harm a fly, or anywhere in between depending on the owner's preferences. A properly trained Rottweiler isn't going to buckle over just because you kicked him in the stomach, thats why you train him and feed him to have muscles to protect himself from that kind of attack. Would be robbers would do themselves well to avoid this nonsense about throwing the dog a steak and "just kick him", LOL good luck with that.

    206. Re:a gun by shiftless · · Score: 1

      A dog is always with you, so whenever you're not there your dog won't be either. You can't leave your dog at home while you go on vacation.

      I don't know what part of the city you live in, but you do realize theres more to life and homes than what's available in the city, right? Your dog is always with you--WTF? The only people I know who are that nutty live in places like San Franscisco, and their dogs serve replacements for a life. You most certainly can leave your dog at home in most parts of the U.S., and yes, even while you're on vacation, assuming you have--I dunno, maybe FRIENDS--that could stop by and feed the thing every once in a while?

    207. Re:a gun by confused+one · · Score: 1

      I like that... That's good.

    208. Re:a gun by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

      That doesn't even make sense. I have several guns, and they are all traceable because I bought them legally. Most people who have multiple guns bought them legally.

      And if your guns are stolen? Now it isn't traceable to the guy who stole your gun and used it in a crime.

      Large gangs breaking into a home to get guns is almost unheard of.

      So are cases where a homeowner successfully protected his house/stuff/family with a gun. They're way more likely to shoot an innocent victim. Yet the reality of the statistics doesn't remove it from the discussion.

    209. Re:a gun by retchdog · · Score: 1

      i think it's called objectivism. not particularly new; all you need to do is make up some convenient definition of rationality which implies your conclusion, accuse the mark of violating it, and then keep saying "A is A" until they cave and/or write you off as a loon.

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    210. Re:a gun by endikos · · Score: 1

      Perhaps material possessions aren't worth risking your life, but protecting your family is. Besides, this seems backwards somehow. Someone that breaks into my home needs to assess whether it's worth risking their life and well-being in order to attempt to steal my possessions and put myself and my family at risk.

    211. Re:a gun by idle12 · · Score: 1

      If something isn't working out for you, use excessive amount of violence and XML. Not only is that how I develop all my apps, that's also how I manage my relationships and everything else. Including baby sitting and camping.

    212. Re:a gun by idle12 · · Score: 1

      > Actually, we found that s "Beware of the bees" sign (with a couple of hives in the back yard) had a much higher deterrent value than a "Beware of the dog." sign. How exactly did you determine deterrent value?

      Are these people getting robbed enough on a regular bases that you could actually perform tests to see which sign deterrents more thieves?

    213. Re:a gun by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      "Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent." - Salvor Hardin, Foundation (Isaac Asimov).

    214. Re:a gun by fifedrum · · Score: 1

      tell us more about this "occupant frequently leaves her bedroom window open and sleeps in nothing but a lacy black thong."

    215. Re:a gun by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Or work for the US Postal Service?

    216. Re:a gun by mcgrew · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If a criminal knows they have a pretty good chance of going up against a paranoid citizen with a gun strapped to his mattress, they're likely to strike elsewhere. They do not want to go into a gunfight, no matter how well equipped they are.

      The criminals in my town don't seem to have a problem with getting into gun fights, or any other kind of fight for that matter. But it's usually two or more criminals shooting at each other. There was a gang fight right down the street from where I lived when my kids were little; two gangs shooting at each other. The only shot that actually hit anyone hit an unarmed man trying to get his kids inside.

      There was a different kind of firefight two days later -- the gangsters' house burned to the ground.

      But note that even if guns were illegal, there would still have been as many shots fired from as many guns as were fired. The thing about criminals is, if they don't respect laws against homicide, why would anybody expect them to respect gun laws?

    217. Re:a gun by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      Save the money on dog upkeep.

      Shit on your own carpet.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    218. Re:a gun by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      More bullet not a bad idea, either...

    219. Re:a gun by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      grab a vase or other living room-type of heavy object so you can make your Hollywood counter-attack.

      A Saiga-12 with twenty-shell drum magazine is slightly more cinematic than a flying vase. How about an entire wall lined with shelving units, each one loaded down with several dozen spring-launched vases... that might do it.

    220. Re:a gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Do you or your friend want to buy this tiger-stone. i keep tiger away, 100% guarantee!

    221. Re:a gun by DoninIN · · Score: 1

      My favorite saying! If violence isn't the solution to all your problems. It's because you're not using enough.

  2. Peace of mind or deter thieves? by noidentity · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you want peace of mind, yeah, put surveillance and monitoring, or just get insurance and back your data up. If you want to deter thieves, you just need to make it an unattractive target. You could put fake cameras and blinking lights, but that might tell a thief that there's something worth stealing.

    1. Re:Peace of mind or deter thieves? by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Exactly. Putting up theif deterrants in the form of monitoring systems only attract thieves.

      If you want DIY home security - put bars on windows where your firecode allows, make sure you've got deadbolts on every door - the kind that need a key from both the inside and outside (so they don't break the window and reach in) - and make sure the blinds are closed, so people can't go inside.

      A camera doesn't make your house any more secure. Surveilance is not truly a form of security, it's a form of prosecution.

    2. Re:Peace of mind or deter thieves? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, nothing like blinking bells & whistles to tell a thief that your place is worth hitting. Best thing to do would be put up semi-concealed low light cameras and use a motion recorder, if you're really that afraid of your precious stuff getting stolen.

      But in reality, the cops don't give a shit about your possessions getting stolen and will put in zero effort to do anything about it. Even with video footage, they'll just take it and say well no one was picked up that night matching that description CASE CLOSED. Buy an insurance lottery ticket and keep your non-replaceable data containing devices somewhere where they won't be picked up and walked off with. Oh, and stop worrying about the big, bad real world.

    3. Re:Peace of mind or deter thieves? by HBoar · · Score: 1

      Bars on windows will have the same effect of attracting thieves as you state monitoring systems will. Plus who would want to live in a house with barred windows? May as well just go to jail.

      If someone really wants to get in to your house, they will find a way.

    4. Re:Peace of mind or deter thieves? by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 1

      Except that bars go on the inside of the window, and if you set up the blinds or any covers properly, thieves won't be able to see them.

      Most thieves won't have the means to get past barred windows and well locked doors - the two entry points every thief chooses.

      Yes - someone could bring a chainsaw and work their way through your front door or even your side wall - there is no stopping that. I have never heard of this happening. I've heard of countless thieves either
      A) Breaking in the window
      B) Breaking in the door

      So if you secure those 2 entry points will good locks and bars, you have next to nothing to worry about, and the best part is that those 2 systems are not visible attractors for thieves.

    5. Re:Peace of mind or deter thieves? by HBoar · · Score: 1

      So now you're covering your windows too... Surely in that case you may as well just live in a concrete bunker? I don't see the point in making your house secure at the expense of your own comfort.

    6. Re:Peace of mind or deter thieves? by nospam007 · · Score: 1

      What about getting a fucking safe, small ones are about 50$ and if they are fixed to the wall from the inside, thieves will have to do some work, especially if you place a few decoy safes around.

    7. Re:Peace of mind or deter thieves? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, if it makes you comfortable, you can say fuck the bars and invest in a drop-down portcullis system instead. Or just ultra-strong glass.

    8. Re:Peace of mind or deter thieves? by Xeno+man · · Score: 1

      Don't ever put a deadbolt that needs keys to open from both sided. That is such a fire hazard. "Hey the house is on fire. I'd like to get out but I can't remember where I put my keys."

    9. Re:Peace of mind or deter thieves? by Runaway1956 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You do realize that most doors can be kicked down by a moderately healthy guy? Many people have locks on their doors that are worth more than the door. If a person is going the route of barring windows and buying good locks for the door, we better remind them to really LOOK AT their door. Is that door really suitable for use as a security device, or is it more suitable for a dressing room, as prevention of voyeurism? What holds the door and it's frame to the studs in the wall? What secures the door itself to the door frame? Believe me, six or nine little #2 phillip's screws aren't going to keep me out of anyplace that I really want to be.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    10. Re:Peace of mind or deter thieves? by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 1

      where do you get your portcullis' from? my last supplier was using sub-par materials, and they broke down after only one weekend sedge by the local hordes. also, do yours come with complimentary moat crocodiles?

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
    11. Re:Peace of mind or deter thieves? by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 2, Informative

      you make a fantastic point. unless your doors are steel framed, you can open it with a couple well placed kicks.

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
    12. Re:Peace of mind or deter thieves? by russotto · · Score: 1

      Believe me, six or nine little #2 phillip's screws aren't going to keep me out of anyplace that I really want to be.

      Nowadays, you can easily get Class 1 deadbolts with lag bolts on the strike plate which go all the way through to the studs.

      Not that this will keep a determined thief out. But it might work on opportunists who kick the door and move on to the next place if it doesn't work.

    13. Re:Peace of mind or deter thieves? by oldspewey · · Score: 1

      Many jurisdictions have fire codes that ban double-keyed deadbolts for exactly this reason.

      --
      If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
    14. Re:Peace of mind or deter thieves? by phyrexianshaw.ca · · Score: 1

      and if that's the case, I hope to hell a fire never breaks out and the fire marshal ever NEEDS to kick down your door to save your life.

      there's more than one side to everything.

    15. Re:Peace of mind or deter thieves? by phyrexianshaw.ca · · Score: 1

      and many others have similar sets of restrictions on the protection required to ENTER a house,

      in case a child is left inside, and the fire marshal needs to force entry to save a life. or any one of thousands of other use cases.

      (also, I'm glad it's not just me that understands that there are safety implications to keeping yourself TOO safe.)

    16. Re:Peace of mind or deter thieves? by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      The fear of an effective prosecution is the most effective deterrent to many thieves. A hacksaw can get through those bars, but it'll take enough time they're likely to be caught. That's why the bars work. If you have off-site recording of sufficiently clear video, it would work just as well so long as you can convince the thief of that fact beforehand. The "beforehand" part becomes the problem.

    17. Re:Peace of mind or deter thieves? by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      Okay, you've got one side of the door pretty securely anchored. What about the side with the hinges? I've seen many doors held to the door frame by nothing more than the six or nine little screws I've already mentioned. Often times, the door jamb is held by nothing but a few staples. A door that swings inward won't be stopped by the jamb anyway. Given a good quality deadbolt, the swinging side will stay in place when the hinged side is kicked in through the door frame.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    18. Re:Peace of mind or deter thieves? by andy1307 · · Score: 1

      Putting up theif deterrants in the form of monitoring systems only attract thieves.

      He should install his DIY monitoring system on his neighbor's house then.

    19. Re:Peace of mind or deter thieves? by Glendale2x · · Score: 1

      If they're not steel framed at least get some hefty 3" or better wood screws (or lags) that are long enough to go into the frame of the house. The stupid short ones 99.9% of people have just attach to the decorative trim or equally weak door frame.

      --
      this is my sig
    20. Re:Peace of mind or deter thieves? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lemme bend your air. I replaced a master bedroom interior door with a steel (insulation core) outside door. The threshold (bottom portion of the frame) was cut off as that is out of place inside. It is secured with a couple dozen 3-1/2" deck screws (or more). The strike plate was replaced with one of the 6" jobbers also secured with long deck screws. Caulking around the frame? Fuck yeah after being packed tight with high density insulation (think 10x denser than house insulation). The frame doesn't budge. Am I on the right path here? Oh yeah, it has a deadbold that I sleep with locked. Am I paranoid or do I live in a bad neighborhood? No. I wanted a door that was insulated, sound proof, and light proof (it is hung to sweep just a tad under the carpet level). I figured, why fuck around with doors we used to accidentally put holes in as kids. "The door" is one of the few security measures I have. No, you couldn't break through the window without waking me either (another story).

    21. Re:Peace of mind or deter thieves? by RichiH · · Score: 1

      > You do realize that most doors can be kicked down by a moderately healthy guy?

      You do realize that fiction is not fact? Movie stars use their foot, real people use a ram. And at least in Germany, outer doors which can not be pushed in (without pushing the whole anchored frame with them) once closed have become the norm. Merely closed, not locked.

      Obviously, burglars know this and have been crowbarring a random rear window out with the whole frame for ages. Which is why anchored window frames have started to become more common.

      As an aside: Any crime done in Germany with the help of a gun becomes grave by default, doubling the suggested sentences. As burglars don't have to plan on protecting themselves against gun-toting residents (think this through from their side, they don't want to die/be caught), no burglar in Germany has a gun. This means that even if someone were to break in, at the very least they would not be equipped to kill/maim quickly/by mistake/for whatever reason.
      This results in less risk for life and limb for both parties. Win-win if I ever saw one.

    22. Re:Peace of mind or deter thieves? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know what they are called in English, but in Finland you often see apartment doors with multiple short steel bars on the hinge side of the door frame. As the door closes, the steel bars fit into holes in the door. They keep the hinge side secured a lot better than just a few screws.

    23. Re:Peace of mind or deter thieves? by Szechuan+Vanilla · · Score: 1

      This is basic, it's rule number on of minefields:

      "If you make it hard to get in, you also make it hard to get out."

      --
      This space intentionally left blank.
    24. Re:Peace of mind or deter thieves? by Kymermosst · · Score: 1

      In many (probably most) U.S. jurisdictions, using a firearm during the commission of a felony is an enhancing factor for charges and/or sentencing. Here in Oregon, it results in mandatory minimum sentencing of 5 years for the first offense.

      I don't know if anyone has studied if that actually reduces the number of guns being used during commissions of ordinary burglaries.

      --
      "Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives" should be a convenience store, not a government agency.
    25. Re:Peace of mind or deter thieves? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i thought they carried axes for doors.

    26. Re:Peace of mind or deter thieves? by RichiH · · Score: 1

      > I don't know if anyone has studied if that actually reduces the number of guns being used during commissions of ordinary burglaries.

      Studies have shown time and time again that stricter penalties help almost nothing as no criminal _wants_ to be caught, or expects to be. Else, they would not do it in the first place (in most cases).

      What helps over here is that the burglar does not need a gun to increase his/her chance of survival/well-being. I would be willing to bet that "fewer burglars" correlates with "almost no private gun owners" not with "higher penalties". Correlation is not causation etc, but I am convinced that there is a link.

    27. Re:Peace of mind or deter thieves? by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 1

      the fire marshal has better tools that a boot heel.

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
    28. Re:Peace of mind or deter thieves? by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      I had that very thing on my mind last night, as I drove to work. I just bought an ultracheap knockaround car, that I don't very much care if some idiot at work backs into it. 1992 Mazda 626, purchased from a guy in Hooks, Texas. The thing still has his Texas license plates on it, and the big blue inspection sticker in the window.

      Funny thing about inspection stickers. Arkansas ended vehicle inspections several years ago. (fifteen? Less than twenty years ago, I think, but I'm not sure) The reason was, there was so much fraud involved, the state finally stopped enforcing the inspection regulations, ended inspections, just did away with all of it. The penalty for fraud was generally a scolding - fines amounted to a couple day's wages. Nothing serious.

      Texas, however, will burn you for committing an inspection fraud. Lose your business license, pay huge fines, and possibly spend time in jail. NO ONE in Texas who is authorized to do inspections is willing to commit an inspection fraud. No one that I've ever met, anyway. This 18 year old car is in better shape than many 10 year old cars operated in Arkansas - because Texas takes their law seriously!

      To me, it seems obvious that if the penalty is high enough, and sure enough, criminals aren't going to commit the crimes.

      Whatever - I'm in a good spot to purchase old used vehicles for cheap, drive them for a couple years, and get another. The last car I bought like this lasted for four years, at an average cost of about $350.00 per year, plus fuel. Beats hell out of paying $350.00 monthly car payments, and still having idiots at work putting dents in it!

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    29. Re:Peace of mind or deter thieves? by noidentity · · Score: 1

      make sure you've got deadbolts on every door

      And be sure some moron didn't install them with only half-inch screws. Whenever I move into a new place, I replace the deadbold screws with 3 inch screws.

    30. Re:Peace of mind or deter thieves? by mikechant · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Putting up thief deterrents in the form of monitoring systems only attract thieves.

      Unless 90% of the houses on your street have monitoring systems etc. - in which case not having one makes you the target...

    31. Re:Peace of mind or deter thieves? by Urban+Nightmare · · Score: 1

      More than one person has died around here because they had to much security. When the fire broke out they couldn't get in and the guy in side couldn't get out. I actually watch a neighbours house burn to the ground because they tried the door and couldn't get in. They just poured water on it from the out side and found the remains later. Hope he was dead before the fire got to him.

    32. Re:Peace of mind or deter thieves? by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      True.
      We use deadbolts, and to deter the break glass, reach in approach, we have security glass mounted behind the door glass and screwed into the door. Use hurricane glass* for the regular windows.
      Doesn't look like a jail, but is quite secure. Finding hurricane glass in California was impossible though, so we had to special order it.

      Doors are screwed into the studs, not just the door jamb.

      -nB
      * for those not in the know: The glass is a laminate product that can stop a 90 MPH 2x4. I think that is sufficient to also stop a perp with a brick.

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    33. Re:Peace of mind or deter thieves? by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 1

      I still think it makes you less of a target not having one if everyone else does.

      It means 90% of the houses are worth breaking into, while yours is not.

    34. Re:Peace of mind or deter thieves? by RichiH · · Score: 1

      > > Studies have shown time and time again that stricter penalties help almost nothing as no criminal _wants_ to be caught, or expects to be.
      >
      > To me, it seems obvious that if the penalty is high enough, and sure enough, criminals aren't going to commit the crimes.

      I should have been more explicit in that I was talking about "secret" crimes. Crimes in which a criminal assumes or reasonably expects to be caught will happen a lot less.

      Fwiw, there is almost no general & exhaust test fraud in Germany, either. People receive an enema of epic proportions for faking official documents and with every policeman being able to radio in to the base and confirming tests, getting caught is all too likely.

      Obviously, there is some heavy pre-selection at work as old and crappy cars tend to be checked for papers etc a _lot_ more often than anything that looks reasonably new and/or well-maintained. I speak from experience; my record is being checking three times in a single day whereas most people I know average exactly zero checks in their whole life.

    35. Re:Peace of mind or deter thieves? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "Exactly. Putting up theif deterrants in the form of monitoring systems only attract thieves."

      that's bullshit. Stop being stupid.

      Fuck ugly bars. Just get a load tripwire security system.

      I would rather replace a broken window then have ugly ass, and value lowering, bars on my windows.

      If it really comes down to me weighing the costs of bars v. continuously replacing windows, I''ll move.

      You really don't knwo shit about security.
      IT's abut levels for determent, THEN capture. The level is determined by risk. TO me at a certain point I would just move.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    36. Re:Peace of mind or deter thieves? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. Putting up theif deterrants in the form of monitoring systems only attract thieves.

      Maybe in James Bond-land, but out on the street where 90% of criminals that are idiots they'll just avoid it. Why bother with the potential of trouble when there's easy pickins around?

    37. Re:Peace of mind or deter thieves? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Minor correction:

      You do realize that most doors can be kicked down by a moderately healthy guy who know what he is doing?

      Try it some time. Just kick a solid wood front door with a properly installed dead bolt.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    38. Re:Peace of mind or deter thieves? by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 1

      How much does a bar cost? Maybe $30 How much does replacing a window cost? More than that.

      The real question is, Do you want to work out the cost of replacing your TV, Computer, home stereo, DVD collection, Silverware and whatever else a thief might steal?

      In that case, those bars for $30 each seem more costly.

      And if you get insurance for it all, why bother with any of it?

  3. What's that coming over the hill? Is it a monster? by rainmouse · · Score: 2, Interesting

    From what I had read, sorry I don't have a link to it ATM, but apparently most burglars agree the one truly effective deterrent that makes them go some place else, is a big dog.

  4. what do you intend to achieve? by FuckingNickName · · Score: 1

    What do you intend to achieve with this system?

    The best security is formed of a nice area, a good lock and a well-trained guard (yourself, for most households; your neighbours might also keep an eye out for you).

    Electronics will just make you feel cooler. But the stuff will still be stolen and, no, you won't get it back. Those tracked-my-IP-address-camera stories are one in a million, and always seem to have glaring holes in the accounts.

    1. Re:what do you intend to achieve? by Idarubicin · · Score: 1

      Electronics will just make you feel cooler. But the stuff will still be stolen and, no, you won't get it back.

      Precisely. Your laptop is sitting front and center in the middle of your desk. Your television is the most conspicuous thing in your living room. In less than two minutes, the competent burglar has located and lifted the most valuable objects in your apartment. (Unless you lock the TV in your closet every time you go out...?)

      Your best bet is to buy a homeowner's/renter's insurance policy with a high deductible -- self-insure for the small stuff, and cough up as little as possible so that you aren't ruined by the rare just-in-case disaster.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    2. Re:what do you intend to achieve? by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      One additional thing: Backups(preferably automated and offsite). The majority of laptops are pretty cheap, and you can insure the ones that aren't; but only backups can save your data.

  5. What do you have by Herkum01 · · Score: 3, Funny

    So...

    What are you going to buy that is worth stealing?

    1. Re:What do you have by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 4, Funny

      He's going to have a kickass security system that he doesn't want thieves to break in and steal.

    2. Re:What do you have by psithurism · · Score: 1

      What are you going to buy that is worth stealing?

      To further help your security needs, where are you going to locate valuables in your house, and what is your address?

      But in case you're serious, I'll list the stuff:
          My computer room gadgets could probably be ebayed for around $500, though it cost me and my roommate over $2K+ to accumulate and would cost the same to replace. I think this is normal for a geeky apartment.
          I don't have TV room or a sound system but a lot of my friends do, representing another $5k+ of cash investment plus time and effort to get it just right and saved console games, etc.
          I'm a dude and as such have no jewelry, but women typically accumulate several thousand dollars worth of it from Xs and rich relatives, much of which is sentimental and the price tag means little. And so if you've got a chick or are a chick (one is likely even on slashdot), or lives with you that is another vulnerability.
          We've got unused credit cards, cash and other misc potentially valuable and annoying to lose stuff lying around in the bowls and dresser tops we use to empty our pockets.
          $5k+ of collectibles which would probably not be touched if thieves didn't know what they were, but if they did we might be a target.
          Often I take the bus leaving my $5k car and spare key at home.

      Then the real difficulty of burglary is putting your house back together after a couple guys run through it, dumping out your drawers, bookshelves and cabinets hoping you've got money/jewelry/guns/drugs stashed in there. Even if you don't hide stuff in your (possibly pricey) mattress, the thieves won't know that, and have to check. Plus whatever they smash to get in/out is coming out of your security deposit. And if you've got a girlfriend, your place may be permanently tainted; she won't be in the unsafe place and she will be taking all her remaining stuff out, even if she lived there. I can't remember all the money relevant cards/papers that may be valuable in my house, and even if I could, I couldn't efficiently cancel them. Also I need gadgets from work at home at times, and no idea how much work would be made fixing and apologizing for the loss.

      So in the end, there is often over ten thousand dollars lost in the theft and a lot of mental anguish. If you haven't considered how to protect your stuff, you really should.

    3. Re:What do you have by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A gun.

  6. Here's where NOT to start... by Simulant · · Score: 0, Troll

    ... X10. Avoid them like the plague. Apart from being general douche bags, their equipment is crap.

  7. where to start with DIY home security? by digitalhermit · · Score: 1

    I'd start with shooting lessons at the local run range...

    OK haha...

    Your local police departments often have basic home security pamphlets and some can even send out community liasons to help with securing your home. I'd start here first *before* investing in cameras and all the gadgetry. If you don't secure your home first, some lucky burglar will have some shiny new cameras and alarms to pawn.

    1. Re:where to start with DIY home security? by sexconker · · Score: 1

      I don't care how much of a geek someone is, DIY is almost always inferior when talking about anything complicated and physical.

      DIY website? Sure.
      DIY car? No.
      DIY coffee table? Cool.
      DIY baby monitor? Bad.
      DIY pointless electronics project with blinking LEDs? LOL nerd.
      DIY pacemaker? LOL dead.

    2. Re:where to start with DIY home security? by Dishevel · · Score: 2, Informative

      I don't care how much of a geek someone is, DIY is almost always inferior when talking about anything complicated and physical.

      DIY website? Sure. DIY car? No.

      Yes!

      DIY coffee table? Cool. DIY baby monitor? Bad.

      Really DIY baby monitor you consider complicated? Turn in that geek card.

      DIY pointless electronics project with blinking LEDs? LOL nerd. DIY pacemaker? LOL dead.

      --
      Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
    3. Re:where to start with DIY home security? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DIY baby monitor? Bad.

      DIY Nursery Temp Monitor

    4. Re:where to start with DIY home security? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe you just suck at everything not involving a computer.

    5. Re:where to start with DIY home security? by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      GTFO, you clearly do not belong here.

    6. Re:where to start with DIY home security? by cynyr · · Score: 1

      how DIY if a car are we talking? steel stock to car? how about a kit car? http://www.factoryfive.com/table/ffrkits/orderakit.html as an example. I'm willing to bet I could do a better DIY baby monitor than the $50 graco one I have, that makes no effort to filter background noise at all, can't monitor 2 channels at once(despite being a 2 room system) I'm willing to bet an AVR/PIC + fm transmitter/receiver would work better, or mybe a zigbee radio.

      The pacemaker I do agree with you on, the rest of the list not so much.

      --
      All of the above was encrypted with a Quad ROT-13 method. Unauthorized decryption is in violation of the DMCA.
    7. Re:where to start with DIY home security? by camperdave · · Score: 1

      Really DIY baby monitor you consider complicated? Turn in that geek card.

      No kidding. I can make a baby monitor out of a pair of walkie talkies and a rubber band.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    8. Re:where to start with DIY home security? by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      DIY baby monitor = only if you're interested in it. It's cheaper to get an off the shelf one unless you really want to get into constructing those things.

      But I have an inkling that the GPP is one of those who thinks woodwork is neater than electronics work. Far be it from me to criticize taste, but I will criticize him for denigrating other people's hobbies.

    9. Re:where to start with DIY home security? by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Kits are not DIY.
      Building a PC from components is not DIY.

      DIY involves creating your own design, not following a guide. Then you're just an assembler.

      So you got a shitty baby monitor.
      That doesn't mean that the one you build will be any better - it'll still have shitty interference problems and you'll be buying shitty commodity parts. The fact that you mention zigbee tells me you don't care if your baby's screaming his lungs out and you can't hear him.

    10. Re:where to start with DIY home security? by sexconker · · Score: 1

      And you clearly, like 99.9999% of geeks, nerds, and slashdotters, think too highly of yourself.

      You do not have the expertise, the resources, the facilities, the government approval, the lawyers, or the insurance to build a pacemaker for your uncle.

      You can clean out the viruses on his PC, and upgrade his RAM, but that's about as useful as you'll ever be to him.

    11. Re:where to start with DIY home security? by sexconker · · Score: 1

      A kit is not DIY.
      Someone else did the work of designing the thing, getting the components, and figuring out how to put them all together.
      You're just an assembly man.

      A DIY baby monitor wouldn't be hard at all.
      It sure as fuck wouldn't be reliable enough to trust your baby's life with.

      You, as the great fucking geek you are, do not have the resources to design and test a proper piece of RF equipment.

      But please, have a kid (this will be tough - you're on /. after all), then convince the wife that your shitty little project is just as good as the $100 thing from Phillips.

      Hey, maybe you can make it an open source project, that'll surely make it reliable.

    12. Re:where to start with DIY home security? by Dishevel · · Score: 1
      First of all I understand that it is a kit. A fully customizable kit. Designed by guys that wanted a car they could not get.

      Second of all not only is a DIY baby monitor easy but can also be made reliable easily. I also take offence to your statement that I know nothing of of radio equipment. I know enough to run 250 mobile Tait radios in a taxi fleet with 3 separate transmitters located in 2 counties. But you go ahead and make assumptions. They are working well for you so far.

      --
      Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
    13. Re:where to start with DIY home security? by sexconker · · Score: 1

      They are working well.
      Did you build those radios?
      Did you do the RF testing for them?
      Did you submit them to the FCC?

      Protip: You're not doing it yourself.

    14. Re:where to start with DIY home security? by Dishevel · · Score: 1
      Do I repair the radios? Yes.

      Do I repair the transmitters? Yes.

      Is submitting to the FCC a requirement for knowledge? No.

      Are you a nit picking, pedantic, small minded shit just looking for an argument to make you forget your sad little life? I do not have that information. You tell me.

      --
      Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
    15. Re:where to start with DIY home security? by Theoboley · · Score: 1
      --
      Stupidity only gets you so far, then you've gotta try
    16. Re:where to start with DIY home security? by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      Really DIY baby monitor you consider complicated? Turn in that geek card.

      Really? You think he was ever issued one?

      How would he feel about people building their own airplanes?

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    17. Re:where to start with DIY home security? by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      OK, my airplane started life as 26 sheets of blueprints, and an order for 200 lbs of steel tubes. It has involved orders for rolls of polyester fabric, fiberglass cloth, and gallons of two part epoxy. The end result is lighter, faster, and has a higher payload than the factory Cessna 172.

      I guess to be a REAL DIYer, I would have to smelt iron ore to get the steel tubes, and haul sand in from the beach to make the fiberglass.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    18. Re:where to start with DIY home security? by Dishevel · · Score: 1

      I guess that was a bad assumption on my part.

      --
      Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
    19. Re:where to start with DIY home security? by sexconker · · Score: 1

      No, you don't have to do all the manual labor yourself - you simply have to make your own blueprints and design!

      The THINKING is the important part.
      You can of course copy the ol' Wright Brothers when thinking about lift and such. But assembling something according to a design - no matter how complicated - is not do it yourself.

    20. Re:where to start with DIY home security? by sexconker · · Score: 1

      You did not build or design the radios.
      You did not build or design anything.
      You did not do it yourself.

      You installed, configured, and maintain it.

      At best you also assembled it according to the design someone else put all the work into.

      You did not create anything.
      You did not do it yourself.

    21. Re:where to start with DIY home security? by idle12 · · Score: 1

      That $100 thing from Phillips isn't rock solid either. It's not like it has redundant power sources, redundant transmitters, etc... At best they probably have a battery back up. Most any consumer grade equipment won't be.

      Secondly that's not even the point. It's not like you leave your kid in a far away location in life threatening situations for long periods of time while maintaining radio silence and amuse everything is correct unless you hear a mayday call.

      Third, just because you "build" a monitor yourself, doesn't mean you have to design every single piece of hardware from scratch. I setup one, it's a very simple solution. We have web cam + mic + speakers in room and then have a net book with mic/speakers and screen.

      You can see everything going on clearly. There is also two way communication, my spouse can talk to little bobby while she's cooking dinner. If there is ever any question what so ever about if the device is reliability communicating, we would check up in person. In fact, one time the wifi went out, my spouse yelled up "Bobby come play in the kitchen till dinner is ready". Problem solved.

      This setup actually work betters than ever monitor we looked at. She can glance over and see what he's doing. Voice-only doesn't work if he's unconscious or otherwise unable to communicate.

    22. Re:where to start with DIY home security? by sexconker · · Score: 1

      That $100 thing from Phillips isn't rock solid either. It's not like it has redundant power sources, redundant transmitters, etc... At best they probably have a battery back up. Most any consumer grade equipment won't be.

      A battery backup and AC power are, in fact, redundant power sources. I believe the one I bought my friend does have multiple transceivers.

      And yeah, that is the point.

      The simple fact is that all you fucking nerds like to think you're special by assembling some shit - be it code, PC components, a car, or a Sears model home.

      But there's a reason people on the assembly line get paid shit, and the people actually designing and testing things get paid well.

      For every 1 nerd worth his salt, there's 1000 slashdot posters. Guess which you are.

  8. Do you really want to build your own? by aphelion_rock · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I went down this path years ago only to have a system plagued with the occasional false alarm. I spent years tring to figure out why. The cause was discovered by accident when the police, who was nearby, commented that the alarm went off as soon as he pressed the button on his two way radio. The system was not immune to RF interference. I have since settled on a good quality commercial system that I have installed myself, it is programmable and covers all of the areas of the house that I want and sends me an SMS if it is set off. Someone else has done the painstaking R&D leaving me to get on with enjoying life.

    1. Re:Do you really want to build your own? by zuperduperman · · Score: 4, Informative

      Agree - I just went through the process of researching and installing an alarm, and the bottom line is that while the technology seems cool at first it is actually finicky and you are dealing with a serious pain-in-the-ass when things don't work right (your neighbors won't be friends for long when stray cats are setting off alarms next door at 3am).

      Therefore I went with an Elk M1 system that is pricey but infinitely expandable into a complete home automation system and comes with an ethernet module that lets you do whatever you want in software - and that is where I will have my geek fun with it.

    2. Re:Do you really want to build your own? by seanadams.com · · Score: 4, Informative

      +1 on the Elk M1. The serial interface has an extensive command set. It is also accessible over ethernet, but their ethernet module is little more than a standard terminal server so you can just as easily use your own. I have written a Perl module to communicate with it using the POE framework. So you can integrate it with your insteon, A/V, etc. It supports nearly all of the Elk commands. http://www.seanadams.com/ha/automogator

    3. Re:Do you really want to build your own? by antdude · · Score: 1

      What good quality commercial system are there in USA?

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    4. Re:Do you really want to build your own? by Glendale2x · · Score: 1

      I've always liked the GE NX-8 or NX-8E (formerly known as Caddax) and all its various expansion modules that you can mix and match to create a unique system. I've always taken the extra effort to hardwire the sensors so I don't have to worry about RF interference, although there is a small handheld wireless panic button that hasn't given any trouble.

      --
      this is my sig
    5. Re:Do you really want to build your own? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I installed an M1 Gold in my house as well. I liked it so much that I actually ripped the GE Concord 4 that I had installed in my vacation house and installed another Elk M1 Gold there as well. You really can't go wrong with the elk system for security and basic home automation, it does it all. I have my system setup to automatically close our garage door if it is left open too long (which used to happen all the time). I have the system at my cabin setup to automatically turn on pipe heaters in the winter, and shut off water and drain down pipes if power is lost or when the alarm is set to certain modes (vacation mod vs away or stay mode).

    6. Re:Do you really want to build your own? by eUdudx · · Score: 1

      Depending on where you live, Fry's or similar is a good place to start with components, the boxed systems at Sam's Club (or similar) used for convenience stores are pretty cheap (and you don't have to program anything). I agree with the parent, unless you just like hacking, a scratch build with Linux is overkill (but might be fun...it can do things like tell whether it's your wife or girlfriend walking to the door and warn you to hide the other).

    7. Re:Do you really want to build your own? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Note to self:
      Snip the cable & phone line BF stealing this guy blind...

    8. Re:Do you really want to build your own? by b0bby · · Score: 1

      I got the Skylink SC-1000 from Amazon for ~$140. It has wireless sensors (2, you can add more), a wireless motion sensor, a main control pad & a wireless module that can call a list of numbers & play a recording if the alarm goes off. The siren is pretty darn loud, and you can buy an external one to go with it too. All in all, it's about as good as I had hoped for the price, and about all that I'm willing to spend on an alarm system. I really only set it if we're going to be away for a few days or more, I also have a Zoneminder system with two cameras. If I get a call from the alarm I can either try to check the cameras (if I have internet access) or just call a neighbor to go have a look. So it's DIY in that I installed it, but otherwise there was little thought required.

    9. Re:Do you really want to build your own? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your neighbors may not be friendly even if the 3:00 am alarm is caused by real burglars. I received a very annoyed call from my neighbor, and when I apologized for the false alarm, she said, "Oh, no, it's not a false alarm -- they just broke into your car and stole your radio -- now will you turn that damn thing off?"

    10. Re:Do you really want to build your own? by baptiste · · Score: 1

      DSC alarms are fantastic. Many places online sell them at good prices and while the manuals can be intimidating at first, they are VERY detailed and VERY informative. They have a wide range of modules for access (X-10, ethernet, Digital I/O, etc) and use a simple 4 wire communications bus. That said - if you install your own system - DO RESEARCH. Simple mistakes can render a system useless and in some cases dangerous. If you install smoke detectors - READ the whole manual - something as simple as looping wire around the screws without cutting it can result in a potentially fatal malfunction. Also - many dealers have their own monitoring services. You don't have to pay $40/month. You can often find UL listed and certified monitoring companies for $10/mon.

  9. obvious suggestions by SethJohnson · · Score: 1
    I know many will say the same thing. But perhaps I'll be first.
    • First: A sign on front door that says, "Rattlesnakes for sale: $25.00"
    • Second: Pistol. Taurus makes a gun called the Judge that fires 45 cal bullets and 410 shotgun shells in the same chambers. Not my favorite gun, but it does lend itself to someone who wants a varied approach.
    1. Re:obvious suggestions by mschuyler · · Score: 1

      The reviews I've read on the Taurus Judge suggest it is NOT a good security weapon, especially using the 410 round, which does not have enough penetration to be any good. See: http://www.theboxotruth.com/docs/bot41.htm for details. Of course, the OP was likely suggesting a system that would be in force when he wasn't there, so a firearm might be way off topic here. In any case, a Glock 40mm or a 12 gauge would be much better choices than a Taurus Judge for home protection.

      --
      How about a moderation of -1 pedantic.
    2. Re:obvious suggestions by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

      With 000 buck, it has penetration, but only 3 balls.

      Birdshot a CQB range will at the very least hurt like hell and make a great noise.

    3. Re:obvious suggestions by dangitman · · Score: 1

      First: A sign on front door that says, "Rattlesnakes for sale: $25.00"

      What's that going to do? You're just going to get lots of annoying people knocking on your door enquiring about the rattlesnakes for sale.

      Second: Pistol. Taurus makes a gun called the Judge that fires 45 cal bullets and 410 shotgun shells in the same chambers. Not my favorite gun, but it does lend itself to someone who wants a varied approach.

      So, is this some kind of autonomous pistol that can protect your house while you are not home?

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    4. Re:obvious suggestions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The point of the Judge is that it is a Big Freaking Gun. It is very intimidating to look at, even if it is completely impractical.
      I didn't know Glock made grenade launchers though...

    5. Re:obvious suggestions by tophermeyer · · Score: 1

      I've got a buddy with a Judge that loads his own 410 ...with rocksalt. He wants to make sure he can detain the intruder without killing them. I think he's crazy.

    6. Re:obvious suggestions by element-o.p. · · Score: 1

      For home security, you don't want penetration.

      If you shoot at and miss an intruder, your son/daughter down the hall or your next door neighbor could be the victim instead of the intruder. I own several guns, but my home defense weapon of choice is my Mossberg Mariner. Granted, it's a 12-gauge rather than a .410, but IMHO, any kind of shotgun would be much more suitable than a 40mm.

      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
    7. Re:obvious suggestions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      000 is roughly 10 pellet round in 12 gauge.

    8. Re:obvious suggestions by KahabutDieDrake · · Score: 1

      Well, I can assure you he's going to jail the first time he uses it on someone. Crazy or not.

      As the lawyer, and police officer both told me. Don't wound people. Either let them walk away, or kill them. Wounding them just puts you in court for the next 2 years while the thief rakes you for money. Point being, dead men tell no tales, and while it's possible next of kin will sue you, its your word against a dead thief (that tried to kill you, remember?). A guy in a wheel chair is sympathetic. Stories of a thug with a knife don't lead to sympathy.

    9. Re:obvious suggestions by quickgold192 · · Score: 1

      You put a 410 in the 1st chamber followed by a .45. The first shot is just to locate the guy, and the second shot is to seal the deal.

    10. Re:obvious suggestions by KahabutDieDrake · · Score: 1

      You are correct, anything is better than a 40mm when dealing with home defense. Of course, the only thing I know of that is man portable and shoots a 40mm is a grenade launcher, and you probably don't want to be using that in your house anyway.

      Humor aside, I'm going to argue the choice of a shotgun in QCB. You get points for the sound it makes when you load a shell. Everyone knows that sound, and they aren't going to be happy hearing it. That's pretty much where your advantages end though. Even assuming you have room to wield the gun properly, which is assuming a lot, it's slow to fire, slow to reload and effectively unaimable. By that, I mean, if your wife is behind the bad guy, you can't miss her, even if you want to. I personally prefer a nice pistol with short load rounds. My preference is for the FN five seven. It shoots a little bullet with excellent trajectory and with short load rounds, the penetration is minimal. (it will go through standard walls, but not a 2x4) It has 20 round clip and even an idiot can handle one. The recoil is minimal, and with a tactical light on the front, it's terribly easy to aim. See the bright dot? That's where the bullets will go.

    11. Re:obvious suggestions by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      You don't want to hurt the bad guy or damage his hearing, you want him to stop. 00 or slugs, that way he stops NOW!

    12. Re:obvious suggestions by fuscus2010 · · Score: 1

      The snake idea is not good. They seem to be thief magnets and if it becomes known that you have snakes then often your place is broken into and only the snakes stolen. Me and many of my fellow snake keepers have been forced to use other security methods. Name and address NOT supplied

    13. Re:obvious suggestions by mschuyler · · Score: 1

      "You don't want penetration."

      Sure you do. You use "Home defense ammo" that is hollow point. It both penetrates and expands causing maximum damage. The idea is to "stop the threat." This ammo, unlike FMJ (Full Metal Jacket) is NOT going to go through the wall and kill someone a house away. If you're serious about this, you wanmt two to the body mass and one to the head. This "I don't want to hurt anyone" nonsense means you are not serious about protecting yourself from someone who assuredly does not feel that way about you. And you don't want a pop gun either. You need a 40 or better, the largest you can handle safely. If you can handle a .45, like a 1911, go for it. I have a Glock 9mm, and, frankly, it is a little underpowered for self-defense. But the ammo is cheaper, so I can practice more and hopefully be more accurate enough to make up the difference.

      I understand some people say shotgun is best. I don't disagree with you.

      --
      How about a moderation of -1 pedantic.
    14. Re:obvious suggestions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      as the bad guy, do you want to take the chance that it's loaded with 410 and not .45? A big barrel is often enough, which is why I go 12 ga with bird shot. I live in an apartment. Over-penetration is a concern.

    15. Re:obvious suggestions by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

      A number of police have told me that if you shoot in self defense, "keep shooting until you see brains".

    16. Re:obvious suggestions by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 1

      i operate that weapon on the principal of "1 .45 round, then 4 rounds of 3 ball buckshot, then i get another gun out with larger ammo if i still need it." that, and i also operate on the principal of "once people start shooting holes in you, your motivation tends to go downward" sure, a .22 makes a small hole in you, *but it makes a hole in you*
      you may not kill on the first shot with 410 birdshot, but all except for the most hopped up meth head are going to be damn distracted, if not deterred.

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
    17. Re:obvious suggestions by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      You need 12" of penetration, or you might as well not shoot at the bad guy. 40mm is of course overkill.

    18. Re:obvious suggestions by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      If it will not go through a 2x4 it will not kill a baddy. If you cannot get 12" of penetration in ballistic gel it is not a suitable round.

    19. Re:obvious suggestions by fast+turtle · · Score: 1

      The biggest issue with Guns is a lack of Willingness to Kill. I'm of the School that firmly believes that if I pull the gun, some one is going to die because If I shoot, I shoot To Kill. The alternative is to never pull the gun. For those looking at something that's going to be a deterent, get yourself a Paintball gun. These hurt like hell at close range and mark the Perp for Pickup by the police.

      Another option is to get the Escima tactical batons - these are simply a set of nested spring tubes with a weight on one end and a handle on the other. Very useful and they don't take up much space but work great as a deterent for anyone not on Drugs of Drunk out of their skull. The final option I'd suggest is a tactical pepper spray. Depends on your locale though as to what you can get. Some are more effective then others - depends on amount of Caspian and if CS is combined as some do.

      --
      Mod me up/Mod me down: I wont frown as I've no crown
    20. Re:obvious suggestions by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      That's bullshit. A guy broke into my friend's place one night hopped up on meth. My friend is a combat vet, certified marksman, and general gun nut. He grabbed the .45 ACP next to his bed, chambered a round, and... beat the shit out of the guy by pistol whipping him, as once he saw the guy he never felt his life was in danger. The thief went to jail on multiple counts and my friend was commended by the officers on duty for his restraint. His attorney said it'd be no problem at all if the guy tried to sue, and she'd probably be able to handle it pro bono (she is his regular lawyer for his business, though, so it's not like she's offering free services to some new client off the street after an initial consultation).

      Minor wounds like from rock salt under the skin are not going to lead to lifelong disabilities and huge settlements. It's true that when you actually shoot deadly rounds you should shoot to kill and not to wound. That's not just for the lawsuits, but also because when you shoot to kill you're more likely to hit (center mass being easier to hit than a limb), you're more likely to disable the attack coming at you, and you can fire faster and with less hesitation between shots if you're trying to fill the fucker with metal than if you're trying to think about where to hit and with how many rounds.

      Yes, if you start firing actual metal rounds into an attacker, empty the weapon into center mass. Even if they manage to survive and sue, you're safer during the attack to disable your attacker completely than to send them into an injured rage by grazing their thigh or something. Make sure whether they are still breathing or not to call 911 to report the incident as soon as you can safely do so without allowing them to renew the attack on you. Otherwise, you could be in trouble for not reporting it soon enough, including if he could have been saved from your gunshot injuries and you let him bleed out.

    21. Re:obvious suggestions by nomadic · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As the lawyer, and police officer both told me. Don't wound people. Either let them walk away, or kill them. Wounding them just puts you in court for the next 2 years while the thief rakes you for money. Point being, dead men tell no tales, and while it's possible next of kin will sue you, its your word against a dead thief (that tried to kill you, remember?). A guy in a wheel chair is sympathetic. Stories of a thug with a knife don't lead to sympathy.

      What about that whole philosophical impact of having killed another human being? I'd rather be sued for 2 years than have to kill someone.

    22. Re:obvious suggestions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The reviews I've read on the Taurus Judge suggest it is NOT a good security weapon, especially using the 410 round, which does not have enough penetration to be any good. See: http://www.theboxotruth.com/docs/bot41.htm for details. Of course, the OP was likely suggesting a system that would be in force when he wasn't there, so a firearm might be way off topic here. In any case, a Glock 40mm or a 12 gauge would be much better choices than a Taurus Judge for home protection.

      Does a glock 40mm look anything like this?
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bofors_40_mm

    23. Re:obvious suggestions by psithurism · · Score: 1

      So, is this some kind of autonomous pistol that can protect your house while you are not home?

      I would like to second that with my actual reasoning.

      1) Although security salesmen like to perpetuate the idea that armed men are going to break into your home and run amok, every home theft that happened to someone I know happened either when they were at work or when an invited (often self invited) guest nabbed stuff when they weren't looking. I've heard of a couple of thefts that occurred in the night while people were sleeping, but then again, if you're sleeping the gun still doesn't do anything.

      2) A nice pistol like that is going to make a prime thing to steal, especially if you tell people about it. I have friends that own guns, most keep them in a safe, with their ammo locked up separately, with the exception of one retired guy who is 1) home all the time and 2) originally from a neighborhood that would require that sort of thing. Oh, come to think of it, with another exception, my mother's neighbor, whose shotgun and ammo were stolen and now likely in the possession of the really scary guys that live across the street.

      A sign on front door that says, "Rattlesnakes for sale: $25.00"

      What's that going to do?

      I mentioned in another comment that burgers who bust in while you and your neighbors are at work often start overturning your shelves and dressers in hopes some jewelry or documents are hidden in an underwear drawer (100% accurate assumption for my family) or that 'Judge' hidden in fake book, but if they think that in one of these drawers is a box of baby rattlesnakes they might tiptoe about and only grab some obvious stuff. Once again, I am basing this on the actual example of how my parents were burglarized without such a sign.

      I recommend a dog, a big one, it is like an autonomous weapon when you are or aren't home. Supposedly he will protect your home while your gone, though will probably just greet the burglars looking for pats and treats, burglars won't know this from the racket he is making.

    24. Re:obvious suggestions by DaleSwanson · · Score: 1

      A number of police have told me that if you shoot in self defense, "keep shooting until you see brains".

      Those weren't cops, they were zombies.

    25. Re:obvious suggestions by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

      Intruders, threats, zombies - shoot till you see brains is just good sense.

    26. Re:obvious suggestions by RichiH · · Score: 1

      > Pistol.

      If someone breaks into my place (in Germany), they will not have a gun. Never ever.

      1) They don't need one to protect themselves against me having a gun. I live in Germany, thus don't.
      2) The default sentence doubles if they carry a gun while committing a crime.

    27. Re:obvious suggestions by muckracer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      > I'd rather be sued for 2 years than have to kill someone.

      Agree with the basic sentiment of preferably not killing anyone ever. But are you really sure about that? Perhaps when asked again *at the end* of those two years? Or *at the end* of 20 years, when you still have half your pay check seized for the damages awarded to the intruder(s family), even though he went out of his way to mess with you, had the worse outcome of the fight but a better lawyer in court?

    28. Re:obvious suggestions by archmcd · · Score: 1

      Just a warning, you can't practice with a 9mm and expect to be accurate with a .45. They are not the same weapon, and if you pull out your .45 in a high pressure situation after practicing with your 9mm, you're going to miss. Also, it should be noted, you can get an "LEO only" clip (try eBay, your local pawn shop/gun shop or some other shady internet site) for the Glock 9mm that holds a ridiculous amount of ammo, and with enough practice, you can get those rounds off pretty damn quick and accurately too. The sheer number of rounds and speed of discharge makes up for the lack of stopping power of a single 9mm, especially since you'll probably need to get a few shots in before you actually hit your target.

      Also, you're misrepresenting the meaning of "penetration." Penetration refers to how far through a target the bullet will travel, whereas expansion is the reciprocal of penetration, and refers to how big a hole you make inside your target when the bullet mushrooms out. You don't want penetration, you want expansion. You can't have both, as a round that is designed for both is intended to take down a moose and expand after travelling 3/4ths of the way through it. Most humans are just not as thick as a moose. Unless you live in Iowa.

      --
      I'm not an expert, but I play one on slashdot.
    29. Re:obvious suggestions by eth1 · · Score: 1

      Or you could just move to a state like TX, that protects the victim from civil suits from the scumbag if it was a good shoot.

    30. Re:obvious suggestions by nomadic · · Score: 1

      All states have self-defense justifications, not just Texas.

    31. Re:obvious suggestions by Ihlosi · · Score: 1
      All states have self-defense justifications, not just Texas.

      Most of which are horribly over-complicated. A good self-defense law only needs two sentences at the most.

    32. Re:obvious suggestions by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      I remember a guy in a bar saying once "if you think you injured them in the car accident, back over them to make sure" as a response to staying out of lawsuits.

      When the justice system comes to grips with this truth, perhaps we'll have more sensible judgments in both cases.

      That said, there's something to be said for putting a suffering animal out of their misery ;-)

      "I'm sorry for permanently injuring the plaintiff your honour, I'd be glad to shoot them in the head if they're that hard up."

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    33. Re:obvious suggestions by element-o.p. · · Score: 1
      Are you kidding? A grenade launcher against an intruder would be totally AWESOME! . Pointless -- it would do more damage than the intruder possibly could -- but awesome :)

      Okay, okay. My bad. I did, of course, mean .40 rather than 40mm. See what happens when I don't critically think about *all* the details the O.P. mentioned when I reply? He said:

      In any case, a Glock 40mm or a 12 gauge...

      In any case, I'll still stick with my shotgun. I've kind of always assumed that in a home defense scenario, it's probably going to be the middle of the night, in which case my wife will be sleeping next to me -- not in a stranglehold with the baddy behind her. Furthermore, the beauty of a shotgun -- especially at CQB ranges -- is that you don't have to aim it. Since shot will scatter as it leaves the barrel, all you have to do is point it reasonably close to your target, and some of the shot will hit. Therefore, when adrenaline is high, visibility is poor, and I need the FIRST shot to count, I'd prefer a shotgun to a handgun or rifle. I also disagree with most of your other points about a shotgun. I own a Mossberg Mariner with an 18 1/2 inch barrel, not a duck hunting gun. Unless the bad guy is standing on my arm, I'm pretty certain I can wield it just fine, even with the full stock on it. I also have just a pistol grip, if I'm ever in a place where the extra length of the M-16 style stock currently in place is too big. It may not be as quick to fire as a semi-auto, but with an eight round capacity and a pistol grip on the pump, it's fast enough. It is slow to reload, but if I can't stop an intruder after eight shots (nine, if I already have one round chambered), then I doubt more shells will make much difference :)

      However, on the off chance that I find myself in a situation where the Mossberg is not the best tool for the job, my collection also includes a 9mm, a .380, a .25, a .22 and an assortment of rifles. All I'm saying is that none of them will be my first choice inside my house.

      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
    34. Re:obvious suggestions by element-o.p. · · Score: 1

      Don't be mistaken. I'm absolutely *NOT* saying "I don't want to hurt anyone." If you are in my house with malicious intent, I want you down for the count. I'm saying I have a daughter down the hall, and a neighbor on the other side of my bedroom wall (it's a zero lot line). I don't want to miss the bad guy and kill one of them instead because I bought a hand cannon. I'm reasonably certain that my 12 gauge has plenty of stopping power without unnecessarily placing my daughter or neighbors at risk.

      And yes, I can handle a .45. I've shot a friend's Springfield 1911 (really, really nice gun, by the way) and another friend's Ruger Blackhawk .44. I was fine up to and including the .44 mags, but I was done when he loaded up the corbons. I could shoot them, but it wasn't much fun :) In truth, if I was starting over, I'd probably swap my Beretta 9mm for something a little heavier. It's a nice gun, but yeah, it's a little under powered. When I bought it, I was 19 (my dad bought it for me), and chose it because it's what the military used. I figured ammo would always be readily available, but didn't think hard enough about stopping power.

      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
    35. Re:obvious suggestions by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      That's what she said.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    36. Re:obvious suggestions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is not the same thing as having an actual "castle doctrine" law to explicitly protect homeowners. Usually, self defense justifications have nothing to do with civil litigation after the event, just guidance for what level of response homeowners can employ and what prosecutors should do about it.

      And somewhere else in all these comments is a post from a guy in Massachusetts which states that the law there requires that even in his own home he and his family must flee rather than use deadly force. I don't know if that's true, but I grew up in Rhode Island, and recall MA having some damned strict gun laws. My parents live in Florida now; dad tells me the law there explicitly allows lethal force in self-defense even outside the home, with no requirement to attempt to flee, sort of like a "castle" law where the entire state is the castle. We've never discussed what FL law says about civil liability. There are huge differences between states as far as what their laws say in matters of self-defense.

      - T

    37. Re:obvious suggestions by mschuyler · · Score: 1

      Good comments overall, btw! I do not believe I am misrepresenting penetration. You need it. Consider, for example, the Taurus Judge. It's marketed as a big ass defensive weapon, but in its 410 mode, penetration is like an inch--not enough to do any damage. I believe there are only two or three balls in a 410 and they just don't do the job.

      I personally do carry pepper gel for the ocassional frisky dog that wants to bite my cocker spaniel, but I would never rely on pepper spray to stop a determined attack. For some people, just like a taser, it just angers them. And if they ARE high on meth (or adrenaline) they can fight right through either weapon.

      I do agree with the comment that practicing with a 9mm does not prepare you for using a .45. I did fire a friend's 1911 a few weeks ago. I was cringing expecting significant recoil, and was surprised that it handled very nicely. I suspect the extra weight of a 1911 (compared to a Glock 19) compensates for the bigger caliber.

      I guess as a final comment I learned through experience that when a threat happens, the adrenaline is going to hit you like a ton of bricks. You'll start shaking as it dumps into your bloodstream. What helped me through was working through the potential scenario in advance dozens of times, enough so that when it happens, you don't have to think, "What do I do next?" You just do it as you've practiced it. Reaction time and a steady hand are more important than caliber (within reason).

      --
      How about a moderation of -1 pedantic.
    38. Re:obvious suggestions by archmcd · · Score: 1

      I had missed the original mention of the Judge, and I couldn't agree more. I am totally on the same page as you with respect to penetration. What a worthless weapon. With all that recoil, yet an extreme lack of penetration, you may as well try to stone your assailant biblical style. I myself carry a .45, and I practice with it when I can afford to do so (.45 ammo is not cheap, especially in the past 2 years.) I can handle the recoil pretty well, and I'm a good shot, but it takes a little longer to train on your target than a 9mm. I've never had to pull it out in a life-or-death situation and I'm not sure I'm comfortable with doing so. A good friend of mine used to be a law enforcement officer, and he loves his big guns. But for defense, he insists on a 9mm which he learned the hard way has enough stopping power to save his life, is easier to control, and it carries many more rounds in case the first few miss.

      --
      I'm not an expert, but I play one on slashdot.
  10. The solution by buchner.johannes · · Score: 2, Funny

    A moat and a drawbridge.

    --
    NB: The message above might reflect my opinion right now, but not necessarily tomorrow or next year.
    1. Re:The solution by DarthBling · · Score: 1

      By the power of Grayskull, what a great idea!

    2. Re:The solution by RichiH · · Score: 1

      Moat filled with laser-sharks. Bridge equipped with chainsaw-bears.

    3. Re:The solution by zwei2stein · · Score: 1

      I prefer narrow coridor filled with weapon traps. Most thieves and baby snatchers do not make it past first trap usually.

      --
      -- Technology for the sake of technology is as pathetic as eschewing technology because it's technology.
    4. Re:The solution by alabandit · · Score: 1

      A Dragon! or some knights manning the draw bridge but they always gripping about pay and rescuing princess

      --
      "You are still innocent until proven guilty. What's changed is what they do to innocent people." by notnAP (846325)
    5. Re:The solution by realxmp · · Score: 1

      Someone's been playing dwarf fortress

    6. Re:The solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And sharks with frikkin laser beams...

  11. Risk Management by Wolfling1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    OK. This is all about Risk Management. There are four strategies to Risk Management (check out the ISO on Wikipedia - 31000 I think?): 1. Mitigate the chance, 2. Mitigate the damage, 3. Insure it, 4. Accept it.

    It sounds like you're not too keen on Accepting it, so lets consider the other three options. The magic here is to budget for it. Don't spend $1M to protect your $1000 stereo.

    Chance mitigation is all about making it less likely for you to be invaded. This is about taking away temptation (eg tint your windows, good curtains), making entry harder (locks, security screens), and discouraging attackers (those cool stickers that threaten trunk monkey attack)

    Damage mitigation is about reducing the damage once they're in. Alarm system. Connected to local security firm. Be prepared to pay $1 per day for monitoring.

    Insure it. Nuff said.

    There is nothing in this about video-ing the perps. There is nothing in it about having a gun, or traps or anything weird. When you assess the possible outcomes, those things don't reduce your loss, and likely increase your trauma.

    Good luck!

    1. Re:Risk Management by sexconker · · Score: 1, Troll

      There is nothing in this about video-ing the perps. There is nothing in it about having a gun, or traps or anything weird. When you assess the possible outcomes, those things don't reduce your loss, and likely increase your trauma.

      Seems to me if people break into my house intent on robbing, raping, and killing me, and I shoot them dead before they get the chance, I've mitigated the damage.
      Step 1 is out because we're already at the point of something happening.
      No insurance can get me back from that, so step 3 is out.
      Step 4 is out too because I'm not a pussy liberal, so I'm not going to "accept" a solution that involves calling 911 and waiting while I've got a dick in my ass, a heroin scarred clit in my face, and a knife to my neck.

    2. Re:Risk Management by Barny · · Score: 1

      If I only had mod points...

      Insurance is the first and foremost important one, usually a professionally installed alarm will reduce your premiums, good deadlocks too.

      Guns (in America at least) are for personal protection, your stuff... well its just stuff, it can and will get replaced by insurance.

      So yeah, my advice (as someone who has had their house broken into in the past) get good window locks (ones that you can lock closed and open just a little for ventilation), door locks (they saved all my PCs, since the thieves couldn't carry anything big since the doors were all deadlocked) and get a real alarm system, talk to their techs, get a quote, whatever.

      --
      ...
      /me sighs
    3. Re:Risk Management by blackraven14250 · · Score: 1

      I guess being home 24/7/365 has it's security advantages, eh?

    4. Re:Risk Management by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 1

      Seems to me if people break into my house intent on robbing, raping, and killing me, and I shoot them dead before they get the chance, I've mitigated the damage.

      Except for the stuff you'll have to deal with if you have an overzealous, anti-gun prosecutor. Then you get treated like the criminal, not the victim.

      --
      Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    5. Re:Risk Management by Kizeh · · Score: 1

      Be sure to check on the alarm discounts before getting excited. In my case, in a house, an unmonitored alarm gets me no discount. A monitored alarm system gets me about $30 off -- a year. So the discount is less than the service fee for a month, not a winning financial proposition. Or, in the words of my insurance agent, "Don't bother."

    6. Re:Risk Management by moonbender · · Score: 1

      Huh I guess I'm happy I live in a country where crazy paranoids don't have widespread access to guns.

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    7. Re:Risk Management by tophermeyer · · Score: 1

      Except for the stuff you'll have to deal with if you have an overzealous, anti-gun prosecutor. Then you get treated like the criminal, not the victim.

      Plus, you've got to consider local laws. I live in MA where unless the situation somehow requires you to use force you are legally required to withdraw even from your own home. Basically, unless you or your teenage daughter are actually being stabbed you cannot use deadly force.

      Guns are great in places like Texas, where people understand that the owner of the home being invaded is the victim. Not so great in some areas. You need to be sure of your local laws before using any force in home defense.

    8. Re:Risk Management by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is nothing in this about video-ing the perps. There is nothing in it about having a gun, or traps or anything weird. When you assess the possible outcomes, those things don't reduce your loss, and likely increase your trauma.

      Seems to me if people break into my house intent on robbing, raping, and killing me, and I shoot them dead before they get the chance, I've mitigated the damage.
      Step 1 is out because we're already at the point of something happening.
      No insurance can get me back from that, so step 3 is out.
      Step 4 is out too because I'm not a pussy liberal, so I'm not going to "accept" a solution that involves calling 911 and waiting while I've got a dick in my ass, a heroin scarred clit in my face, and a knife to my neck.

      Don't worry - you'll be too busy bleeding to death from being shot with your own gun. The cops will arrive in 30 to 45 minutes, since conservatards like you keep arguing that their budgets and pensions should be cut.

    9. Re:Risk Management by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You watch too much TV

    10. Re:Risk Management by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Empty the gun into them and remember these words for when the media shows up:

      All human life is precious and I cannot believe what I did, but he would not stop coming and I had to defend my family, my community and myself.

    11. Re:Risk Management by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe. Or maybe he just watches the local news.

      - T

    12. Re:Risk Management by morari · · Score: 1

      Easy, don't go to court over it. Those thieves were never supposed to be there to begin with. You have no real motive to the outside eye. There is unlikely to be a link, especially when people that are already on parole wind up missing.

      --
      "He who can destroy a thing, controls a thing." --Paul Atreides, Dune
    13. Re:Risk Management by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hail the castle doctrine.

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
    14. Re:Risk Management by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 1

      if you look up the statistics, it turns out that "being shot with your own gun" basically happens slightly less often than 1 person being struck by lightning twice in the same week. also, 'conservatards' falls outside the realm of friendly debate, and strays into the realm of making you look like an asshole.

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
    15. Re:Risk Management by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      @Step 4

      Wow that is one weird fantasy you have going there!

      I would have gone for two hot blondes breaking in myself.. but I guess different things for different folks. (j/k)

    16. Re:Risk Management by BLKMGK · · Score: 1

      If someone in your country wants a gun and is intending to break the law with it then they will get access to one and the laws of your country will stop you, the law abider, from being able to do anything about it. I seriously doubt that any law passed in your country is preventing the use of guns. One need only look to say the UK to hear about gun deaths in a country known for it's gun laws.

      And if not a gun then perhaps you face a knife or sharpened screwdriver. That's much much better isn't it? Again, one needs only to look at the UK to see this occurring and the ever more silly attempts to stop it that infringe upon the privacy of those abiding the law....

      --
      Build it, Drive it, Improve it! Hybridz.org
    17. Re:Risk Management by Barny · · Score: 1

      Good point, my insurance gave me a yearly discount just for having a licensed alarm installer put an alarm in, so was well worth it in my case.

      --
      ...
      /me sighs
    18. Re:Risk Management by Reginald2 · · Score: 1

      If someone breaks into my trailer...

      I will rape them while screaming that they are liberals.

      After the police come to clean up my mess, I am going to take more of those pills from the internet that make my wiener bigger

    19. Re:Risk Management by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      If I'm home and they are armed (a crowbar used to break a window or a door frame is also a deadly weapon) then I'm protecting myself by use of force up until they leave the premises or surrender their weapon. Your situation where you live may be different by law, but not in reality. work on getting your laws to match reality.

    20. Re:Risk Management by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Step 4 is out too because I'm not a pussy liberal

      Maybe just 'I'm not a pussy' would have sufficed there.

      I wish anti-gun rights weren't associated with liberals. I own 5 guns, yet I'm pretty liberal these days.

      I would shoot an intruder first, then figure out what they wanted second. But I wouldn't bomb Iraq, then figure out if it was a good idea later.

    21. Re:Risk Management by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a heroin scarred clit in my face

      I doubt many of us have a chance to have a "clit in my face".

    22. Re:Risk Management by secretrobotron · · Score: 1

      I think this is the best advice/reasoning here. Until I own a home where having some sort of security system or deterrent is of any use, or even possible to install, insurance is the best option. After searching quickly, insurance companies offer insurance for all your things if they cost about a minimum of $30,000 for about $40/mo. I pay more for my cell phone. The only other element of importance that's worth stealing is the data on my machines which is backed up off-site already, and will soon be locally encrypted when I re-install Arch.

    23. Re:Risk Management by Barny · · Score: 1

      My laws...

      No handguns
      No semi-auto guns
      Only allowed a gun with a specific use (farmer, hunter, sportsman, etc)
      Weapons must be stored un-loaded, separate from ammo in locked cabinets

      Now I agree, if someone enters your home and brandishes a weapon (any weapon can be deadly, so lets forget about trying to distinguish) at YOU then you are within your moral rights to defend yourself. Whether you can live with shooting to kill is another thing, and I know a few friends in both military and police who have a hard time living with having to have shot in such a manner and that they may have to do it again.

      I am a bit of a pacifist, but if someone intends to do you harm and you have a way to defend yourself, go for it.

      --
      ...
      /me sighs
    24. Re:Risk Management by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      And if not a gun then perhaps you face a knife or sharpened screwdriver. That's much much better isn't it? Again, one needs only to look at the UK to see this occurring and the ever more silly attempts to stop it that infringe upon the privacy of those abiding the law....

      Don't worry. We're working on banning pointy knives soon, so you won't be able to use them as weapons because the government banning something makes all existing ones disappear. Soon we will have banned anything that can be used as a weapon and then we will feel totally safe. Feel.

    25. Re:Risk Management by moonbender · · Score: 1

      People tend to worry too much about being stabbed to death and too little about growing old in poverty. Makes sense, because one is a seemingly concrete threat while the other (and related worries) are more abstract. Media reinforces that perspective. Governments don't seem to mind.

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    26. Re:Risk Management by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When it comes to alarm monitoring I would recommend saving some $ and go with Alarm Relay / Watchlight. Thier mornitoring is only $8.99 per month, I have been using them for 5 years over two different residences and have been happy with their service.

    27. Re:Risk Management by BLKMGK · · Score: 1

      I wonder what they will do about all of those Phillips Head screws when this is all said and done...

      --
      Build it, Drive it, Improve it! Hybridz.org
    28. Re:Risk Management by BLKMGK · · Score: 1

      No, one is a more immediate threat and the other requires long-term thinking which most people do poorly at. One is something you have to think about every day and the other is one you have to plan for. I don't think being concerned for personal safety is a bad thing, don't do enough of it and all of the planning in the world for long term care won't matter...

      --
      Build it, Drive it, Improve it! Hybridz.org
    29. Re:Risk Management by eth1 · · Score: 1

      Yes, traps are kind of silly, but a gun would fall under your damage mitigation category. Sure, if I'm not there, then I'm happy with alarm+insurance. It's only "stuff" after all. However, if I or my family is present, then my only interest is in mitigating the damage down as far and as fast as possible, which in my case involves putting as many 0.4in holes in them as it takes for them to stop moving or run away (and maybe some 0.223in ones, too, if they don't take the hint).

    30. Re:Risk Management by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Derp.
      So you want only the criminals to have widespread access to guns?

    31. Re:Risk Management by sexconker · · Score: 1

      This is why you shoot to kill.
      It's then your word against a corpse's.

      You: "He lunged at me with a knife. I fired."
      Corpse:

    32. Re:Risk Management by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Sure would.
      Then again, not being home when someone intends to break into my home and rob, rape, and murder me would also have it's advantages. I wouldn't be there to be raped or murdered. Damage: mitigated.

      Keep trying to paint me as a cloistered gun nut though.

    33. Re:Risk Management by engineer_uhg · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My strategy: own no single item worth more than $200. Simple, cheap, worry-free, and pleasantly un-American.

    34. Re:Risk Management by MikeBabcock · · Score: 2, Funny

      Speaking of risk management, if you're preparing for that eventuality I hope you've also got an anti-nuke shield and a space alien laser weapon detection system because I'm pretty sure both are more likely than your scenario.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    35. Re:Risk Management by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Speaking of risk management, if you're preparing for that eventuality I hope you've also got an anti-nuke shield and a space alien laser weapon detection system because I'm pretty sure both are more likely than your scenario.

      # of instances of alien invasions: 0
      # of instances of nuclear attacks: 2
      # of instances of home invasions involving rape and murder: > 2

    36. Re:Risk Management by moonbender · · Score: 1

      I don't really care; Germany has moderately relaxed gun laws by most standards, and I still don't need to think about who has access to guns and who doesn't. It's just not relevant. I spend as much time worrying about criminals with guns as I spend worrying about a terrorist blowing up the train I'm sitting in. I certainly don't fantasize about people robbing me in my home, raping me etc etc.

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    37. Re:Risk Management by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Derp.
      Neither do I.
      I don't even own a gun.
      Derp.

    38. Re:Risk Management by moonbender · · Score: 1

      You appear to have some sort of speech disorder though.

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    39. Re:Risk Management by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      Handguns are much easier and cheaper to store and lock away properly in a small apartment.

      Semi-auto I don't think means what you think it means. Semi-auto just means that it fires one round when you pull the trigger. Single-action/bolt action/lever action/pump action means you have to cock something before firing. Double-action means you have to cock a hammer before firing, but that if you pull the trigger hard enough (harder than on a single action) it will cock then fire. Burst fire means that pulling the trigger fires some small number of rounds (usually three or five). Full auto means the system fires until you release the trigger or run out of ammunition.

      Semi-auto includes a great deal of small-caliber sporting rifles that have so little power they can't be used to reliably hunt coyotes or deer and are considered illegally cruel to use for such.

      Every firearm has a specific use. Anyone can be a hunter or sport shooter. Anyone can try to defend themselves against armed assailants, whether you choose to do so or not.

      I'd rather live with the consequences of shooting an intruder to kill than not live because I chose not to shoot to kill. I'd much rather shoot to kill and live with the consequences than live knowing an intruder killed my wife or guests in our home because I didn't shoot to kill.

      The problem with gun crime isn't guns. It's crime.

       

    40. Re:Risk Management by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Keep trying!

    41. Re:Risk Management by idle12 · · Score: 1

      > There is nothing in this about video-ing the perps.

      I disagree. That's there to mitigate the damage.

      They break in and steal shit. Ok. But you have video tapes and can clearly identify them. Great, the police might chance them and you might get your stuff back.

      Getting your stuff back from police might be preferred over getting an insurance claim

      A few things I can think off hand: Computers that don't have proper back ups. Your wife's gold necklace (that also happened to be passed down for 5 generations). Your cat or other things that have sentimental value.

      I have a watch from my grandpa. It's probably worth $50 at most in an insurance claim. It's worth a lot more to me though.

  12. There is a Linux Home Security Project by Meshach · · Score: 3, Informative

    http://www.linuxhomesecurity.com/

    All the surveillance is based on MythTV. Seems open source friendly.

    --
    "Maybe this world is another planet's hell"
    Aldous Huxley
    1. Re:There is a Linux Home Security Project by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Couldn't find a download link. Found a link to the "LinkMarket", though.

    2. Re:There is a Linux Home Security Project by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Woo.... a 99% empty website.

    3. Re:There is a Linux Home Security Project by masterwit · · Score: 2, Funny

      http://www.linuxhomesecurity.com/ All the surveillance is based on MythTV. Seems open source friendly.

      A bunch of tabs for future "support" on that website I see... I really hate to be that guy but it reminds me of this: xkcd

      --
      We should start a new Slashdot and return control to the geeks. It actually wouldn't be that hard to get some users to
  13. Stickers & Insurance by Tester · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The odds that you will get your stuff stolen are pretty low. Security systems are mostly a waste of money. Just get some realistic looking ADT stickers (from eBay) that will make the thieves think you have a security system. Having an actual system will get you ZERO extra security, just costs.

    In case you get your stuff stolen, get home insurance, they will give you money and then you can buy newer toys! Actually, get insurance anyway, if the building burns or something and you are responsible, you really want insurance.

    1. Re:Stickers & Insurance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i've had a remote building vandalized and then just this weekend broken into. there isnt much in the building at this point (has stable private wifi, and laptop); however, i'd like to think there is a way to protect my property. i've been using zone minder and testing, which is great, and almost pushed the button to order an axis 215 ptz-e camera today, but with your suggestion that a security systems are pointless (im assuming you meant both prevention and not just identification of the perp... ) what is one to do? just give up? Don't some of the ideas of electronic security apply? prevention is probably the best on the front line, but what about detection, and resolution? i.e getting the alert, the video, the call to the police? i'm just throwing this out there because im really at a loss at what to do?

    2. Re:Stickers & Insurance by L3370 · · Score: 1

      The odds that you will get your stuff stolen are pretty low. Security systems are mostly a waste of money. Just get some realistic looking ADT stickers (from eBay) that will make the thieves think you have a security system. Having an actual system will get you ZERO extra security, just costs.

      I'd have to disagree. Theft is VERY common. Besides, the same statement could be applied to the IT security field and slashdotters would flip out on you.

      Insurance doesn't deter crime, its an after-the-fact remedy. It replaces stolen possesions but it doesn't protect you or your family from harm. those ADT stickers are a good start, as it is an economical deterrant. But acting as if a problem doesn't exist is equally dangerous as having no security at all.

      You may think you will NEVER be a victim of crime in your own home... but what's the penalty if you are wrong? Personally, I think addressing that risk is worth a paycheck or two.

    3. Re:Stickers & Insurance by flynt · · Score: 1

      Surely there must be some studies that have randomly assigned security vs. no security to properties in neighborhoods, and then tracked theft?

    4. Re:Stickers & Insurance by Animaether · · Score: 1

      I disagree...

      Taking this in reverse order...

      Actually, get insurance anyway, if the building burns or something and you are responsible, you really want insurance.

      Absolutely - get insurance, and make sure that the insurance you choose covers all the things you want it to cover, especially when it comes to goods inside the house (google translate tells me the translation for 'inboedel' is 'furniture', but I've never considered a notebook 'furniture').

      In case you get your stuff stolen, get home insurance, they will give you money and then you can buy newer toys!

      That's only true up to a certain point. Many insurers will only pay out what your goods are worth at the time of the burglary/burndown/etc. So while the nice giant plasma TV you paid $1800 for may be insured.. if its practical resale value is only $400, you're not going to be able to buy another giant plasma TV with that money. Again, check, doublecheck, triplecheck your insurance policy.
      Keep in mind also that there are non-monetary / physical good concerns. In the case of a computer, you might also have lost e-mail, photos, etc. Sure, you've got a backup that they didn't steal.. but how old is that backup? In the case of just about any device.. let's say they steal your oven. Hey, stranger things get stolen, and some of the combination microwave/convection ovens aren't exactly cheap. Are you really looking forward to spending time with a replacement oven (if another model) and learning all of its quirks? They may be minor issues bordering on the pathetic, but I'd certainly rather prevent them.

      The odds that you will get your stuff stolen are pretty low.

      Of course.

      Security systems are mostly a waste of money.

      The operative word there being 'mostly'. I've seen some of the security systems that people set up - microphones, videocameras, the works. Those -are- expensive, and mostly a waste of time.

      Just get some realistic looking ADT stickers (from eBay) that will make the thieves think you have a security system.

      Then again, the thieves are likely aware that people do this. It's a bit like the fake car alarm flashing LEDs - that may stop some of the thieves, but let's face it.. plenty of cars still get their windows smashed and goods taken. That LED will merrily continue flashing but in reality do absolutely nothing.

      Having an actual system will get you ZERO extra security, just costs.

      And this is where I disagree.

      My neighbor's house was semi-broken into just last week. The burglars actually made it so far as half way through a small window that must have taken some effort to 1. open, 2. climb up to (larger window right underneath.. not exactly something that you can easily climb up against) and 3. crawl through.
      But they didn't get to crawl through - one of them was half-way through when the -audible- alarm went off. Sure, it woke half the neighborhood, but it also clearly signaled to the would-be thieves that unless they made themselves scant right quick, they'd be f'ed.
      So they bailed and didn't manage to take a thing; heck, they left the bag they presumably had intended to fill up.

      Now, this alarm also alerted a central monitoring agency, which in turn phoned police and a designated neighbor and all that; but all of those would have likely been useless (cops take a while to get there, neighbors running into the streets half-naked isn't exactly instantaneous either).

      So although it may be mostly a waste of money to get a full-on security system with mikes and cameras and so forth, you'd do well to at least invest in a simple alarm system that, for example, just works on movement

      Extremely cheap.. outdoor lighting products use them a lot) routed with a delay (a simple timer circuit) to an audible alarm (also cheap.. get

    5. Re:Stickers & Insurance by morari · · Score: 1

      You [i]definitely[/i] want insurance in an apartment situation anyway. It's hard to tell what the idiots living below or beside you are doing, or when they'll burn the place down through no fault of your own.

      --
      "He who can destroy a thing, controls a thing." --Paul Atreides, Dune
    6. Re:Stickers & Insurance by hamburgler007 · · Score: 1

      Most home insurance worth anything will require you to have a security system installed.

    7. Re:Stickers & Insurance by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      That really depends on where you live. In low crime areas, a burglar alarm costs much more than the discount you get for having it. In some areas it's even statistically likely you'd pay more for the system and monitoring than to replace your likely losses. A remotely monitored fire alarm is a better investment in many areas than remotely monitored home invasion systems, but thankfully once you have one they usually do both.

    8. Re:Stickers & Insurance by RichiH · · Score: 1

      > In case you get your stuff stolen, get home insurance, they will give you money and then you can buy newer toys!

      As any policeman will tell you, being burglarized involves significant psychological trauma for a _lot_ of people.

    9. Re:Stickers & Insurance by pogle · · Score: 1

      Having been the victim of a burglary earlier this year, I have to disagree. Home insurance replaces stuff, sure...after you meet your deductible, and if you can find it again; I lost some old tech thats pretty much impossible to replace at a reasonable price, and I've had to resign myself to hunting ebay and hoping to get 'lucky' and pay 3x what I did 10 years ago for an item that *might* work as advertised. And the loss of that 'secure' feeling in your own home...I didn't sleep well for a month afterward, and its still extremely creepy to think of some punk rifling through our personal effects. The alarm system helps mitigate that a little, in knowing that future incidents will be time-limited at least. And if my wife is home by herself, she has a panic button now.

      I was also lucky, in that whomever broke in got spooked and left after just looting most of one room. They managed to get over $3000 worth of electronics and games, in addition to breaking our front door, but it could have been much worse. Still annoyed that I lost over 10 years worth of save games, but at least our computers were left behind.

      I was considering building a motion-activated camera system on my own, that would email my phone pictures of captured events, and let me notify the police...but then I just talked to ADT, and got a system that covers my house perfectly, with added fire (smoke/heat technically) protection that will give my pets a small chance of being rescued in event of an electrical short causing a fire, or such. The rate is reasonable, and even though someone could technically break in and likely steal about the same amount of stuff as before, and escape before the police arrive, at least I won't then be relying on a random event to prevent them from ransacking my entire house. And if I do get robbed, ADT covers my insurance deductible now.

      Some advice from what we learned in dealing with this...write down EVERYTHING. All your serial numbers and descriptive information on your computers/tvs/handhelds/consoles. Put it somewhere offsite. The police likely will never catch the thief if they break into your house, but if they have the serial numbers it increases the chances of recovering your goods if they find a cache of stolen goods. Plus, if you've registered your consoles, there's a chance you can get Microsoft to help you out in finding it or at least locking it out of XBL. I certainly dont mind screwing the thief or the recipient of stolen goods a bit, even if it doesn't translate to a direct benefit for me. And don't put credit card numbers into consoles. And make sure you have your login for that kind of thing handy, so you can go online and change the account info immediately and prevent someone from accessing your account. If your PC or an old credit card are taken too, well, there's lots of stuff to change and actions to take that I won't spend time detailing, suffice it to say that you have to change it all, unless you've got your hard drive encrypted, etc. If you have a laptop or a nice camera, get in the habit of leaving them at least partially obscured from sight, so if you are victim of a smash and grab, those might slip under the radar. They got my wife's old laptop from the table, but they completely missed my much newer and more expensive laptop that was sitting underneath a couple items.

      Also, if you have them, save scans of all your receipts for everything. Our insurance didn't quibble at all about our listed replacement costs, because we had receipts for every single item save one, and we had the original box and UPC for that item. If you don't have old receipts, at least save the new ones. It doesn't take much room to keep the originals as well, and off-site scans for backups aren't hard. Just get in the habit of scanning it in right after you buy it, while you're registering and recording relevant serial numbers.

      I'll second the suggestions I saw elsewhere regarding getting to know your neighbors. Our neighbors have alarm systems already (we were the only house in th

      --
      http://thechubbyferret.net - Ferret pictures and informative links.
    10. Re:Stickers & Insurance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with this post and buy good locks. Having been broken into, the worst thing is that you feel insecure afterward (I would say violated, but that seems too strong). After the break in, I bought ADT and the installer himself said that the ADT sign out front is a bigger deterrent than the actual alarm. That's was a rash decision. The real problem I had with ADT was that living in the city my phone lines are exposed. Any thief could cut the phone line and break in. The alarm would be useless. So I made another rash decision and bought the cellular phone option which, with the alarm service, is $50 a month. The stole only $1,000 worth of crap (and a lot of it was crap).

      As has been said here before in one way or another, locks are for keeping your friends out. Any one else will get in if they want to.

    11. Re:Stickers & Insurance by will592 · · Score: 1

      Even though it's what the OP asked about specifically, keeping your stuff from getting stolen isn't the only (or even the best) reason to have a security system. When your partner comes home with your kids knowing that the house is locked down and the alarm hasn't been tripped is incredibly reassuring.

    12. Re:Stickers & Insurance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We had an alarm system with stickers, but didn't use it when very often (my ex wanted it for when I traveled). Some high school kids broke into our house, if we'd had the alarm on it would have brought the cops. They spent hours ransacking the place and mostly stole jewelry, which we didn't have itemized so the insurance would only pay $400, which amazingly matched our deductible, so the insurance paid nothing. Now I have a safe deposit box and no wife, so new expensive jewelry. I'm not to worried about a break in. Of course I have insurance.

  14. Woof woof! by Heebie · · Score: 1

    It's been said several times already.. but a big, noisy dog. (preferably one who likes you, but is SLIGHTLY territorial.) but.. if you get a Dog.. you need to learn about pack mentality, and learn how to control the dog.. establish that you're the alpha male, and then make sure the dog is happy enough that he doesn't need to challenge alpha male's status. ;)

    1. Re:Woof woof! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a horrible way to train a dog. You're more likely to end up with an overly aggressive dog than anything else

    2. Re:Woof woof! by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

      A guard dog doesn't have to be big or noisy. It just has to be a dog who wants to defend its pack and home.

      Your training plan is flawed, a well adjusted family dog of any breed will die defending pack and home, doesn't take many barks to put off a robber.

    3. Re:Woof woof! by Heebie · · Score: 1

      The two most important points of having a "guard dog" are that it is:
      1.> Heard
      2.> Seen

      Without those.. it is not a deterrent.

      The training bit is not flawed... if a dog thinks IT is the alpha male.. it will try to subjugate you by any and all means. Dog owners always need to be seen as alpha.. if they aren't.. their dog WILL, without question, have behavioural issues.

    4. Re:Woof woof! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://askdryin.com/blog/2009/03/09/new-study-finds-popular-%E2%80%9Calpha-dog%E2%80%9D-training-techniques-can-cause-more-harm-than-good/

      Says Meghan Herron, DVM, lead author of the study, “Nationwide, the number-one reason why dog owners take their dog to a veterinary behaviorist is to manage aggressive behavior. Our study demonstrated that many confrontational training methods, whether staring down dogs, striking them, or intimidating them with physical manipulation, do little to correct improper behavior and can elicit aggressive responses.”

      Indeed, the use of such confrontational training techniques can provoke fear in the dog and lead to defensively aggressive behavior toward the person administering the aversive action.

    5. Re:Woof woof! by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      My sister is a veterinarian, and she claims all that pack mentality, alpha male stuff is bullshit -- that your dog will protect you because it loves you, not because it considers you the leader of it's "pack". She sort of has a point -- dogs and wolves are separated by over 10,000 years of diverging evolution, to the point where a dog understands what a human means when they point, but a domesticated wolf cannot.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    6. Re:Woof woof! by fuscus2010 · · Score: 1

      Parents have a yap dog that fails the rat test (if you have to kneel to pat it - its a rat). Every neighbor has a yap dog and most of their neighbors have one too. As a consequence if anything untoward is happening every dog goes mental. It is a bit annoying but the number of successful burglaries in that area for the last 20 years is zero.

    7. Re:Woof woof! by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 1

      watch 'the dog whisperer' on the national geographic channel some time. you'll see that parent is correct in this case. If you are the dominant pack leader, then the dog will follow your lead. if you let the dog be the pack leader, it will be aggressive as it is trying to maintain its status as leader. Ceser Millan has shown this over and over: "Dogs are not People." dogs come from a pack mentality, and if you train them based on that fact instead of treating them like a humanchild or something, they will behave well.

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
    8. Re:Woof woof! by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 1

      Improper training does this. Watch the dog whisperer. its not about using "confrontational training methods" its about understanding how dogs work (pack mentality) and training them within that structure.

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
    9. Re:Woof woof! by psithurism · · Score: 1

      a big, noisy dog

      But there is no geekyness involved there; I think he wants to spend some time playing with gadgetry, hence the DYI.

      So, how about a robotic dog? As a kid I had a little electronic kit which I, though I never did the particular project, had a configuration that would bark in response to noise. With an adult budget you could go totally nuts on a concept like that.

    10. Re:Woof woof! by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      I told my dog I was boss by pissing on it.
      (only half in jest).
      I did piss where he was allowed to, thus he was quicker to learn that marking the yard was ok, marking the house? not so much.

      A good house dog will protect you when you're home, but likely retreat in the face of an intruder when no family is home. This is based on my experience where when I was horsing around with one of my friends and my friend got the better hand my dog bit him in the thigh (not too hard, but did break the skin) and held him till I "got away". Some years later when our house was broken into that same dog bolted and started barking like mad, but away from the intruder. The barks did alert neighbors, who chased the robber off, so big stuff was left behind, just money and jewelry was missing.

      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
  15. Choose a place to live where there is no crime by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

    Works for me. I live in a small city, big university . . . no crime. I left my Mercedes unlocked on a Friday after work, came back on Monday morning and was surprised to find it unlocked.

    And the car was still there, and everything in it.

    Stay out of conflict zones . . . and then you don't any need for high tech security systems.

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    1. Re:Choose a place to live where there is no crime by m2shariy · · Score: 2, Funny

      I left my Mercedes unlocked on a Friday after work, came back on Monday morning and was surprised to find it unlocked.

      Nobody locked it for you? Bastards!

    2. Re:Choose a place to live where there is no crime by RichiH · · Score: 1

      This is actually sensible advice.

      I have lived in a total of four places in my life. At every location, doors have been open, cars unlocked, etc pp. Sometimes not on purpose, but more often than not on purpose. While I personally tend to lock down my stuff, I know women who have been leaving their purse with wallet, money, id in the unlocked car for _years_.

      I am not saying you should not lock up stuff. I do. But living somewhere were you don't need to helps.

    3. Re:Choose a place to live where there is no crime by oddaddresstrap · · Score: 1

      Doesn't work for me. I live in a rural area and when you go to town during the summer you have to remember to lock your car. Otherwise, you'll come back in half an hour and it'll be full of zucchini.

  16. It's Fun Foiling Bad Guys! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Marbles, glue, garden-rake, thumb-tacks, bucket o' water (over a door). You should be able to buy this ACME Home Alone security system for about $9.

    1. Re:It's Fun Foiling Bad Guys! by tophermeyer · · Score: 1

      I always looked at the Home Alone movies as instructional videos. Dad never appreciated the extra security...

  17. Try this by AnonymousClown · · Score: 1

    You could put fake cameras and blinking lights, but that might tell a thief that there's something worth stealing.

    exactly! That's why I put stickers with images like this and this on my valuables. And scatter around photographs of people in advanced stages of AIDS and Leprosy around with captions of "me with my buddies..."

    I've never had a problem with theft.

    --
    RIP America

    July 4, 1776 - September 11, 2001

    1. Re:Try this by the_brobdingnagian · · Score: 1

      I've never had a problem with theft.

      Or dates.....

    2. Re:Try this by AnonymousClown · · Score: 1

      I've never had a problem with theft.

      Or dates.....

      Only if they're not pitted.

      What?!

      --
      RIP America

      July 4, 1776 - September 11, 2001

  18. Re:What's that coming over the hill? Is it a monst by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think being dead is a better deterrent. And it doesn't push the problem onto somebody else.

  19. freeballer by freeballer · · Score: 1

    Very interested in seeing what is posted here. Ever since I bought a diy motion detector I've
    wondered about low cost, diy security systems and home automation. I hope some other
    solutions than zoneminder are available. I have relatively small area to cover right now, so a
    camera and motion sensor is enough but I'd like to know how to scale it.

    If you are looking for multiple camera application, and using windows, I've used webcamxp
    with some success. (not free) but it supports some wifi cameras and my logitech orbit (with tilt/zoom).
    A 20$ motion sensor phones any phone call and plays a pre-recorded msg. The webcamxp will email me
    and record/send video

  20. It seems obvious... by jamesdood · · Score: 2, Insightful

    A moat of course. A water barrier is quite effective keeping out the vandals and goths, not to mention pesky viking raiders.

    --
    *narf!*
    1. Re:It seems obvious... by Scarletdown · · Score: 1

      A moat of course. A water barrier is quite effective keeping out the vandals and goths, not to mention pesky viking raiders.

      If you go with the moat, be sure to skip the Gopher Moat model. Those are not very effective.

      --
      This space unintentionally left blank.
    2. Re:It seems obvious... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Water barrier? Is that different Vikings from the renowned sea-faring ones?

    3. Re:It seems obvious... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually Viking long boats is what made them so effective at plundering Europe as they could traverse the shallow waterways as well as open sea despite having a high capacity to carry both men and loot.

    4. Re:It seems obvious... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A moat of course. A water barrier is quite effective keeping out the vandals and goths, not to mention pesky viking raiders.

      Moats don't keep out vikings. They like to travel by boat anyway.

  21. Solution by sexconker · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Dog

    Better auditory detection capabilities.
    Better olfactory detection capabilities.
    Better friend-or-foe algorithms.
    More reliable than any electronic equipment.
    More trustworthy than any security system vendor.
    Faster response times than any security or law enforcement.
    More immediate and satisfying effects than any justice system.
    Fluffier.

    1. Re:Solution by xenapan · · Score: 1

      Dogs require more maintenance. Feeding, exercise, cleanup... And a dog has nearly if not more false positives as a security system. I live with two and one still constantly barks at neighbors, ME, and practically any other sounds. On the other hand, being a night person I tend to slip into the kitchen for a snack or a drink and I can do it easy enough to avoid waking the dogs. I love my dogs, but security systems they are not. I say the best way is to make thieves avoid your house. Make it look like theres nothing of value inside. Thieves only try to steal things when they expect to find something of value. A security system implies valuables. A single apartment in a complex that has security when none of the others around it sticks out like a sore thumb if a thief is scouting for a mark

      --
      insert funny sig here
    2. Re:Solution by EmagGeek · · Score: 5, Insightful
      >> I tend to slip into the kitchen for a snack or a drink and I can do it easy enough to avoid waking the dogs.

      I assure you, you don't. They just know it's you :)

    3. Re:Solution by PolarBearFire · · Score: 1

      Dog Medical diagnostician : will eat your toes to signal that you have diabeetus

    4. Re:Solution by digitalhermit · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but you gotta watch out for those core dumps.

    5. Re:Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Routine core dumps.
      Source of frequent leaks.
      Requires annual maintenance.
      Difficult to trade it in for a newer model.
      Can do major damage if not properly configured.
      False alarms can be triggered by the most distant objects.

      That's why I have two!

    6. Re:Solution by 14erCleaner · · Score: 2, Funny
      Or just get one of these.

      When an intruder enters the area of protection, it automatically begins barking like an angry dog. From outside, it sounds like you have a very unfriendly dog inside.

      --
      Have you read my blog lately?
    7. Re:Solution by Belial6 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Dog

      LESS reliable than any electronic equipment
      TERRIBLE friend-or-foe algorithms
      Shits on your floor
      Cannot be left unattended for a week at a time
      Known to cause physical harm to innocent bystanders
      Occasional one will kill an innocent bystander
      Stinks

    8. Re:Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and for those who do not wish a big or high maintenance dog,
      the Dachshund, is a small, family friendly, doesn't require a lot of exercise, doesn't eat a lot,
      and to top it off, are very good at determining those who should and shouldn't be on the property, and from outside sound MUCH bigger than they actually are..
      we have two.. =)

      they may not be the most intimidating dog to face, but they have me awake and dressed pretty friggin quick.. .. on a side note.. they do have a weird fascination with the kitty litter box...

    9. Re:Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dog

      Better auditory detection capabilities.
      Better olfactory detection capabilities.
      Better friend-or-foe algorithms.
      More reliable than any electronic equipment.
      More trustworthy than any security system vendor.
      Faster response times than any security or law enforcement.
      More immediate and satisfying effects than any justice system.
      Fluffier.

      Though this still suffers from the 3AM false "stray cat" alarm!

    10. Re:Solution by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 1

      More likely to be disarmed with a steak and a rub behind the ears.

    11. Re:Solution by RichiH · · Score: 1

      > Dog

      Annoying.
      Needs food.
      Must be taken care of on-site during holidays etc. Else, they will not be a security system when you need them the most.
      Craps.
      Must be taken for walks.
      Slobbers stuff.
      Not a cat.

    12. Re:Solution by weicco · · Score: 1

      As EmagGeek said, the dogs know it's you and you are no threat but its family member. That's why they don't seem to awake when you pass by. Our dogs are the same but if I go to the kitchen and take sausage from the fridge it's second or two and they are standing beside me asking if they can get a bite too :)

      Now, here's a dog that seems to sleep all the time. It ususally goes somewhere in the middle of the apartment and lies down. In fact it positions itself to a place where it can monitor all of the activity and while it looks like just sleeping there it's ready for immediate action, and I can assure you, that action is propably lethal to anyone who gets in its way. It's originally bread to protect sheep flocks from wolves. I know couple of places where Caucasians are used just for that and they work as a charm.

      I have huge respect for this breed but unfortunately I'm not experienced enough in dog training to own one. These aren't cute little poodles.

      --
      You don't know what you don't know.
    13. Re:Solution by Neil+Boekend · · Score: 1

      I had 2 dogs: Inoe (Golden Retriever) would stay awake all night to detect if someone was there, but was mentally incapable of telling reliably if it was a friend or a foe. Inca (a couple of sheperd types and a Berner Senner mixed into one) would stay awake most of the day because then she get the most attention. If someone came around the back Inoe would start barking (happens during my sleep once a year at max) and wake Inca. Inca then would decide if it was a friend (and suitable to suck up to for some attention) or run straight at it wile barking loudly. Inca and her mother once chased away an intruder. We never heard a friend complaining he was chased away (nor do we expect friends to turn up at 0300) , so we presume the intruder was not legit.

      I do live in a low crime rural area where dogs are very common (I even think the average is 2 dogs per house). My dogs do not bark if no one comes around the back, and if they did I do not think my neighbors would complain much: there are some pretty noisy dogs around.

      --
      Well, I might have a way, but it only works on a semi spherical planet in a vacuum.
    14. Re:Solution by kidgenius · · Score: 1

      Agreed. My 4 dogs always are sleeping (like any dog), but at even the slightest whisper you see their eyes open slightly, and they glance around. Dogs sleep fairly light.

    15. Re:Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> I tend to slip into the kitchen for a snack or a drink and I can do it easy enough to avoid waking the dogs.

      I assure you, you don't. They just know it's you :)

      Unless the GP has the most overbred, worthless dogs on the planet, yeah he just doesn't know dogs very well. My hound knows when a squirrel decides to get on the roof from 2 stories down. He's not the best dog I've owned either (and not a very good example of his breed, sadly, but still an okay dog).

      With that said, and to address the original question, renters insurance is cheap, dude. Trust me, quit caring about your stuff, you can buy more. You only care if someone breaks in while you're there, in that case, get your gun. If they break in while you're at home you have no idea what they may be capable of doing. Normal stuff is insurable and completely replaceable, and if you have something as rare as Batman #1, quit keeping in your house.

    16. Re:Solution by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Then get a cat, and have something that will stare at you asking for food when you're getting stabbed to death. Later, it will eat your eyes.

    17. Re:Solution by sexconker · · Score: 1

      You're wrong.

    18. Re:Solution by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Dog

      Medical diagnostician : will eat your toes to signal that you have diabeetus

      We also have dogs that sniff out drugs.
      And bombs.
      And cancer.

    19. Re:Solution by RichiH · · Score: 1

      I could do that, except:

      1) I live in Germany and burglars don't attack people they rob. As we don't have a shotgun in every home, burglars don't carry weapons themselves. They crowbar a floor-level window out along with the frame, enter quick, leave within less than 15 minutes and don't need to protect themselves from gun-toting home-owners. Statistics prove this correct time and time again.
      2) Unless I am in my bed fast asleep, it's not easy to overwhelm me. Believe me ;)
      3) Cats don't eat eyeballs. They would happily claw me to death for my green laser pointer or catnip treats, though.

      Fwiw, _I_ did not ask for ways to protect myself. I took appropriate measures for stuff I own and live in an area where crime, other than government embezzlement, is de facto non-existent. You will not find many people who lock their cars or close their front doors around here, although I do, most of the time.

    20. Re:Solution by RichiH · · Score: 1

      > nor do we expect friends to turn up at 0300

      You have the wrong friends ;)

      As an aside, while my experience with dogs is limited, every person I know who has a large-ish, non-retarded (i.e. bred stupid), well-trained dog has a well-tuned alarm system.

    21. Re:Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But they're really annoying the rest of the time!

    22. Re:Solution by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

      Costs more for maintenance though, and you have to walk them 2 to 3 times daily, some people do not have that possibility, I have 2 dogs of my own and know the advantages, however, I still want a security system that ties into my home fire alarm so that if there is a fire, and I am at work, it will contact the security company and they have explicit instructions to call the fire department and send someone for the dogs, as well as call me in case of fire....something your dogs won't do if there is a fire but no theft.

    23. Re:Solution by sexconker · · Score: 1

      A crowbar can easily be a very effective weapon.
      A crowbar can easily overwhelm the mightiest of unarmed humans.
      Cats do eat the eyeballs of their dead owners.

      Have you been robbed while you were present?
      If not, you have ZERO insight into the matter - you're simply lucky you live in a low-crime area.

    24. Re:Solution by xenapan · · Score: 1

      see thats the thing... the dogs still bark at me when i come home from work 4 days outta 5. they tend to recognize my voice and when they see me they stop. not to mention.. ive actually woken em up before, they bark, see its me, then go back to bed. plus these dogs are always hungry. they crowd round every time i open the fridge. no way would they pass at a chance for a snack ;)

      --
      insert funny sig here
    25. Re:Solution by darkstar3d · · Score: 1

      Agreed! My folks came over and complained about the dogs controlling their movements at night to the kitchen.

    26. Re:Solution by RichiH · · Score: 1

      > A crowbar can easily be a very effective weapon.
      > A crowbar can easily overwhelm the mightiest of unarmed humans.

      True. Though from everything I read, they leave the crowbar outside. Carrying a crowbar means they can bump into stuff, carry less and they don't need it to defend their life/well-being.

      > Cats do eat the eyeballs of their dead owners.

      I will try to verify that. Intriguing if true.

      > Have you been robbed while you were present?

      No, I have not. People I know closely were robbed while away for about fifteen minutes, though.

      > If not, you have ZERO insight into the matter - you're simply lucky you live in a low-crime area.

      Have you been in space? If not, you have ZERO insight into how satellites work. You're simply lucky that you don't live in a cave so you can see them pass by during the night.

      Same as you probably informed yourself about how trajectories, solar panels and rocket fuel work, I informed myself about the relevant statistics and behaviour in my area. I do appreciate the fact that you assume I don't do basic research, though. Thanks.

    27. Re:Solution by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

      Funny...
      however, I have not yet trained my dog to held the receiver, something about not being able to grow a thumb yet, but dang it, I'll get her done yet!

  22. barking dog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A dog that barks a lot when someone comes to the door is probably the best deterrent.

    That said, I didn't want a dog. I registered a business and set up an account with an alarm distribution company. I then bought a panel, box, wire, keypads, a siren, and various types of sensors. I then printed out labels for all the doors and windows. I then wired the house, connecting all the stuff, and got an alarm monitoring service, to get the insurance discount. Paid for itself in a few years, plus I got better at wiring in walls. You could easily bypass that portion by paying someone who does wiring for alarm installers. They tend to be excellent in sneaking wires you can't see.

    1. Re: Barking Dog by MadMorf · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Came to say this ---^

      Lived in Miami and had many things stolen from my fenced in yard and many "false alarms" on my alarm system whenever I was out of the house after dark.

      Got 2 puppies from the local animal shelter and voila, problems stopped...

      Barking PUPPIES stopped it all...And when they got bigger and their barks were deeper, it was just a bonus that kept solicitors away as well...

      Now, they're both 15 years old and sleep all the time and they deserve it.

      Be a mensch. Rescue a puppy and save yourself a lot of hassle and get a buddy to hang out with as well...

      One of the best decisions I ever made.

    2. Re:barking dog by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 1

      i have a question:
      how do you know its payed for itself? it seems to me that the only way it would definitively pay for itself is if it was used in the process of catching an intruder red handed with enough of your belongings in hand to equal the cost of the systems installation. until it does that, it has been a financial black hole.

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
    3. Re:barking dog by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      He gets a discount, as stated, on his insurance. F his discount has paid off the system, then he should know that. I'd like to know which insurance company he uses if that's the case, though.

    4. Re:barking dog by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      He said "insurance discount."

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    5. Re: Barking Dog by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      Shame about all the dog shit, crotch licking, and the need for walkies.

    6. Re: Barking Dog by HopefulIntern · · Score: 1

      Good for you for rescuing! My partner and I adopted a 2-year old GSD, which was quite a handful at first, but we love him (and no fucker ever comes round to bother us. No sales people, no thieves).

    7. Re: Barking Dog by saider · · Score: 3, Interesting

      We also had a fenced yard with an ally behind it in south Florida (Hollywood). Not the best neighborhood. But we had a 125lb Mastiff/Catahoula mix.

      She had brendel coloring (black and brown irregular spots) which was awesome camouflage. When she laid down in the bushes, she disappeared, day or night.

      People would walk up and down the alley. The dog would just watch them most of the time, until they touched the fence. Then she would go nuts with the barking and drool and meanness. The funniest part about it was that people would walk by at night, get a little too close to the fence and then all of a sudden noise, slobber and teeth would come flying at them out of the darkness. It was good entertainment and my friends and I would sit on the porch and just watch the action.

      One time the police were chasing someone down the alley and the person jumped the fence to cut through our yard. According to the officer, the guy jumped over, he then heard barking and screaming as the guy jumped back over the fence. He practically ran through the policemen getting away from the dog.

      We got a K9 badge from the police a few days later and put it on her collar.

      --


      Remember, You are unique...just like everyone else.
    8. Re: Barking Dog by SleazyRidr · · Score: 1

      Where my mother lives had a small crime wave a few years back. Every house on her street was burgled except the houses with dogs. No-one with dogs got burgled, not even the guy with 2 shiatsus.

    9. Re: Barking Dog by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Nice.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    10. Re: Barking Dog by Reziac · · Score: 2, Informative

      Mastiff and Catahoula, that's gotta be an awesome cross. Most crosses are a mess psychologically due to conflicting instincts, but that's really two molosser types, far more related than they look. What she does is classic molosser behaviour -- ignore what's not a threat, make a believer out of anything that crosses the invisible line from "out there" into "mine".

      BTW the Catahoula type spotting/ticking is merle. Brindle is stripes. Tho it's possible that she's both brindled and merled.

      [hat disclosure: I am a pro dog trainer]

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    11. Re: Barking Dog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The funniest part about it was that people would walk by at night, get a little too close to the fence and then all of a sudden noise, slobber and teeth would come flying at them out of the darkness.

      I had a neighbor like that once. The fence was a short chain link fence by the sidewalk, a public sidewalk. It was terrifying. I seriously considered killing that dog.

    12. Re: Barking Dog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And when they got bigger and their barks were deeper, it was just a bonus that kept solicitors away as well...

      My dog is a Husky; like the GP, she looks scary enough to keep most people who don't know her out of the yard. The exception are the damn earnest white college kids who come around knocking on behalf of various eco-charities. These guys will just waltz right in with her howling away, it's amazing to watch. Working people stay the hell away.

    13. Re: Barking Dog by MadMorf · · Score: 1

      Heh...

      My two mutts were 8 weeks old.
      One Lab and Spaniel mix, one generic retriever.

      Sweetest damn dogs you'd ever want to meet.

      But their barks were fearsome... :)

  23. Need more info by PotatoFarmer · · Score: 3, Funny

    In order to select the correct solution for you, we're going to need your address and a list of the expensive stuff you don't want stolen. Oh, and in case we drop by, please let us know the hours that you're usually at home. Would hate to make the trip out there only to find that you're away. Thanks!

    1. Re:Need more info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or just check-in on foursquare.

  24. Woof by Roblimo · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Our primary home security system is Terri the Terrorist Terrier -- 55 pounds of friendly tail-wagging furry cuddliness if she knows and likes you, 55 scary pounds of big teeth and growls if you're a stranger.

    When we first got Terri my wife and I lived in what some might call a "sketchy" neighborhood, and we KNOW Terri scared off (and likely bit, from the screams) at least one or two intruders in the yard, well before they could get to the house or to my office in a separate building. Terri is also portable; if you need to walk around a not-nice neighborhood, you can take Terri with you.

    Terri has also handled the few rat infestations we've had, using the traditional terrier "shake until dead" method.

    We got Terri from the Manatee County Animal Shelter. There is surely a similar facility near you that has a perfect alarm system waiting to go home and protect you from burglars, cats, and Al Queda operatives -- and who will wag his or her tail when you come home and probably even lick your face if allowed. Don't worry about breeds and all that. You'll know the right dog, and the right dog will know you. Training is not hard, and dog food is cheap. For 24/7 indoor AND outdoor protection, you'll want a doggie door and a fenced yard, but your living circumstances may not allow this. No big; millions of dogs live indoors and go out for walks and to dog parks for exercise.

    "Woof," tweets Terri -- @TerriTerrier

    1. Re:Woof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We had a Black Lab (Shepard mix). Every stranger at the front door would come up and break out some spiel, "Blah blah blah... oh. You have a dog. Well, it was nice talking to you."

      I can second Roblimo's experience with the rodents. Our Lab was a better rodent hunter than any cat I've ever owned.

    2. Re:Woof by The_mad_linguist · · Score: 1

      We got Terri from the Manatee County Animal Shelter.
      I imagine the volunteers were confused as hell why she wasn't placidly swimming and feeding on algae.

    3. Re:Woof by Orphaze · · Score: 1

      What was your dog's name again?

    4. Re:Woof by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      How does Terri fare against a few rounds of .50's?

    5. Re:Woof by 93,000 · · Score: 1

      FTW

      Sorry, that I have no mod points.

    6. Re:Woof by alexo · · Score: 1

      How does Terri fare against a few rounds of .50's?

      Break-ins are usually by people that want your stuff, not your life. As such, a typical robber prefers a minimum fuss, quick in, quick out approach. Unnecessary noise, whether dog barks or weapon discharge, is a liability - it attracts unwanted attention, wakes up the residents (who may also be armed), etc.

      It's easier to pick another target instead.

    7. Re:Woof by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      My wife grew up in a decent neighbourhood that had one suspicious house. She was sure it was a criminal's house because the two very attentive dogs in the yard only ever barked at men in uniform.

      Even criminals know that a well-kept dog is the best security system.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
  25. Put the money towards good insurance by sirwired · · Score: 1

    For the cost of setting up your own security system (or going commercial), you could pay for years of upgraded homeowner's insurance with full replacement value coverage. Take pictures of everything you own, keep copies of the receipts for expensive stuff at the office, and you are good to go. And not just against theft, but against fire, and whatever else you choose to cover with your policy.

    And for the VERY RARE home invasion that occurs while you are home: If you are that worried, yes, a shotgun can go a long way there...

    SirWired

    1. Re:Put the money towards good insurance by CityZen · · Score: 1

      Along this line, you should inquire with your insurance company what options you have for lowering your rates based upon what *they think* is good protection. For instance, people may say alarm systems are useless, but they're still helpful if having one lowers your insurance rates, and thus lets you lower your deductible.

  26. Game camera by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Movement operated game cameras are cheap, and you could pretty easily re-wire to do something other than take a picture if you wanted to.

  27. Re:What's that coming over the hill? Is it a monst by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

    I have to note that a cat is not a viable replacement in that regard. Pretty sure my cats would rub up against burglars, purring, and then lead them to their food bowls, which happen to be near the computer.

  28. Don't bother by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I sold alarms for three years and installed them professionally for one. Don't waste your time. Even in the places that cops actually do respond to alarms, they prioritize them so low that they become basically worthless. It's not like they can do anything once they get there anyways. Only in rare instances can they enter.

    If you do feel that you need one anyways, I recommend one that can text/page/email you instead of paying a monthly service fee. The police will most likely come out if they receive a call from an actual person (you). You can get the basic hardware for about $100-$150. I recommend the Honeywell equipment for simplicity and ease of use. You need simplicity if you plan on arming/disarming it every time you enter/leave your home.

  29. No need to buy them... by AnonymousClown · · Score: 1

    Just get some realistic looking ADT stickers (from eBay) that will make the thieves think you have a security system.

    Several months ago, a woman with an ADT logoed polo shirt and Khaki pants knocked on my door and said "I'm not here to sell you a system. I just want to know if I can put one of our signs on your front lawn."

    I was eating dinner and wanted her to go away, but now I wished I asked why - that was a weird request.

    --
    RIP America

    July 4, 1776 - September 11, 2001

    1. Re:No need to buy them... by barzok · · Score: 1

      How do you know she was legit, and not just part of a crew casing the neighborhood?

    2. Re:No need to buy them... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      simple. Very low cost advertising. Costs them $2 for the sign, people see it and think "I wanted a security system, seems like people are using ADT, they must be good"

    3. Re:No need to buy them... by AnonymousClown · · Score: 1
      I don't know if she was legit. She and her associate had a stack of those lawn signs - it doesn't make sense if they were casing the place. After I told her I wasn't interested, she and her associate left and moved on to another house. They didn't linger. They weren't looking around. They didn't do anything else.

      My best guess was that maybe they were just trying to make it look like they had a bigger presence in the neighborhood than they did - for marketing reasons.

      --
      RIP America

      July 4, 1776 - September 11, 2001

    4. Re:No need to buy them... by pha3r0 · · Score: 2, Informative

      This happens at my home at least once a month, let me explain.

      They offer to put a sign in your yard and give you a free system in hopes your neighbors see it and sign up. What they don't say is the free system is always free (and is of matching quality) and you will end up paying exactly the same as your neighbors soon enough.

      The comment below mine illustrates why I never speak to these people. When I see them coming I sit my dog at the door and answer with 'I am not interested can't you read the sign'. I then snap my fingers slightly behind my back just as they start to talk signaling Shep to leap forward and growl, they NEVER stay.

    5. Re:No need to buy them... by amentajo · · Score: 1

      I think that you miss the point that barzok was making... here's how I interpreted it:

      If she were "part of a crew casing the neighborhood", then her crew could easily use the lawn signs as markers. This would have the benefit of keeping others away (apparently, potential burglars don't try to rob houses with ADT lawn signs) while simultaneously serving as an indicator of who doesn't have real security systems (if you actually did have a security system, then you'd probably either have a lawn sign of your own or you almost certainly wouldn't accept one from them, and you wouldn't go out and get your own fake sign if you already have that one that the nice ADT people gave you, right?)

      Assuming that this "crew" would be able to readily distinguish one of their lawn signs, this makes at least some amount of sense. She was probably legit (Occam's Razor), but the potential downside is big enough to use caution when faced with a situation like this.

    6. Re:No need to buy them... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, it's good advertising. She probably thought you have the nicest home in the neighborhood, so if they put an ADT sign on the lawn, maybe your neighbors would think they should be calling ADT too.

    7. Re:No need to buy them... by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      (apparently, potential burglars don't try to rob houses with ADT lawn signs)

      Yeah, that's not true. I had the stickers and even the alarm hardware to go with them (the previous owner of the house had the system installed, and I hadn't renewed the monitoring) and I still got burgled.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  30. Dogs and Guns by bsDaemon · · Score: 5, Funny

    German Shepherds, and a 12-gauge shotgun. You can probably use the gun for other things, like killing noisy turkeys, and the dog will make an excellent addition to your family and/or good way to attract chicks if you take it for the occasional walk in the park (although, if the dog is out with you, its not home watching the house. Maybe get two and have them work on shifts).

    1. Re:Dogs and Guns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > German Shepherds, and a 12-gauge shotgun

      I don't know why, but the first thing I thought of on reading this was Wolfenstein3d. Except with burglars.

       

    2. Re:Dogs and Guns by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      a 12-gauge shotgun. You can probably use the gun for other things, like killing noisy turkeys

      Really you want a 10 for turkeys. Get a 20 for the house. A 12 is fine for shooting clays.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    3. Re:Dogs and Guns by bsDaemon · · Score: 1

      It depends on the load you're using, and what choke. I don't have the patience for hunting anyway. I just have a thing for military firearms. I wish I could afford a Garand... that's a nice piece :-/

    4. Re:Dogs and Guns by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Understood. I get this from a friend who likes to kill turkeys. He says the feathers really cause bounce, even with a 12 gauge slug. I prefer the immediate satisfaction of a bull's eye target myself.

      Garand, eh? Not even an M14? :)

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    5. Re:Dogs and Guns by muckracer · · Score: 1

      > > German Shepherds, and a 12-gauge shotgun

      > the first thing I thought of on reading this was Wolfenstein3d. Except with burglars.

      Well, it'd be cool if burglars try to enter my place, only to scream in horror: "MEIN LEBEN!!!" :-)

  31. Don't. Buy insurance. by SecurityGuy · · Score: 1

    Your home security system isn't going to keep stuff from being stolen. It might present some deterrent. It might help catch the thief, but it won't do anything to repair the damage the thief causes before realizing you have one. I remember sitting on a bench across from a store some years back. Some guy walked up to the store. Looked in the window. Walked away. Came back and smashed the window to grab some item that probably was worth $50 or so and run. The store had an alarm, which commenced wailing away, but did nothing to get the item back, or the much more valuable window unbroken.

  32. Went through it by Spiked_Three · · Score: 5, Informative

    I went through this about 6 months ago.
    I ran Linux zoneminder and Blue Iris - a commercial but inexpensive Windows program each on their own dedicated servers. The servers were single rack space Dual Atoms. I then installed a $100 eBay wireless IP camera, a Linksys wireless IP camera, A usb video capture card with 1 camera, and a regular USB web-cam so I could try each of these out in comparison.
    The $100 camera was useless - terrible focus. The linksys, being the most expensive at $250 was the best, but is not an outdoor camera without additional housing. The USB camera is acceptable but requires proximity to the servers. The video camera is also acceptable.
    After running the software for 2 months, I eventually settled on Blue Iris. It was $49 and a lot more stable than ZoneMinder. There were some features of zoneminder I liked, but after using both I found several instances were ZoneMinder had flaked out and I could not retrieve data/images that I would need if I was really researching a theft. The errors are very cryptic, often requiring extreme measures to determine what had gone wrong. Usually I just gave up and rebooted everything and it would start working again. The configuration for zoneminder is also very difficult, having to get various versions of video for linux V1 and V2, java applets/jar files etc all tied together. You can go with their 'ready to run CD' to avoid the painful configuration work, but then you are stuck with their Linux distribution, and I wanted to go with the current Ubuntu.

    In the end, I have a system I am confident will provide me with images after an incident that will lead to an arrest. I plan on adding/replacing with more of the Linksys style wireless IP cams, at about $250 a pop as budget allows. The entire system will probably get its own dedicated wireless lan eventually. I can also browse in when I am on the road and check in on things, although that is more of a 'peace of mind' thing and doesn't really have much practical use.
    Server - $300ish with 1.5T disk space, wireless hub (eBay) $50ish, wireless cams - $250ish each, Windows+Blue Iris - $150ish - reasonably expect up to about 6 cameras. This puts it in the same range as a decent Hard disk based dedicated security recorder from say Radio Shack, but with a wireless ability and lot more flexibility.

    --
    slashdot troll = you make a compelling argument I do not like the implications of.
    1. Re:Went through it by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      As someone who has dealt with the police after something like this, your setup is cool but worthless. The police will not be interested in the pictures nor will they do anything about the robbery.

    2. Re:Went through it by Spiked_Three · · Score: 1

      Yes, that is a problem. Fortunately I live in (primitive) area where if you prove to enough people, they will take matters into their own hands if the police are given an opportunity and do not do anything. Happens all the time.

      --
      slashdot troll = you make a compelling argument I do not like the implications of.
    3. Re:Went through it by complete+loony · · Score: 1

      I hope that server's well secured ;)

      --
      09F91102 no, 455FE104 nope, F190A1E8 uh-uh, 7A5F8A09 that's not it, C87294CE no. Ah! 452F6E403CDF10714E41DFAA257D313F.
    4. Re:Went through it by mshieh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That only works if you lock up your server, otherwise you've just provided a thief with more portable electronics to take.

    5. Re:Went through it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would consider using ethernet, as it would be trivial to disconnect all of your wifi clients remotely with a laptop out of sight.

    6. Re:Went through it by Spiked_Three · · Score: 1

      Servers are out of sight - and in a 19 rack. It's not something a petty thief would even have a clue as to what it did, certainly no resale value in the area, and we don't have professional thief's here.

      Actually 98% of all thefts in this area are for one thing, guns. There are about 1% for large screen TVs. 98% are also done by someone the victim knew - thus an image is usually plenty to go on with, like I said, community involvement.

      So yes, I agree, you need to consider your local situation and whether or not its worth the effort.

      --
      slashdot troll = you make a compelling argument I do not like the implications of.
    7. Re:Went through it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So lets play this out....

      You are at work/on vacation/out partying, and someone breaks into your house. They decide to steal your TV AND your computer with all your precious videos. What is your recourse?

      Better yet, the perpetrators wear ski masks. Now what?

      My gut tells me that while this system is "cool" and definitely has a geek factor going for it, its not practical or cost effective.

    8. Re:Went through it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > In the end, I have a system I am confident will provide me with images after an incident that will lead to an arrest.

      'cause having an image of the robber always leads to an arrest. Ever watch the
      evening news?

      And using a wireless device for security is just asking for it...

    9. Re:Went through it by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

      >I can also browse in when I am on the road and check in on things, although that is more of a 'peace of mind' thing and doesn't really have much practical use.

      I particularly like this aspect as I am in constant reminder that a too friendly of a wife/girlfriend can have dire consequences on your bed mattress springs being used up more quickly...story of my life...!

    10. Re:Went through it by IMightB · · Score: 1

      I think that this is the first on topic post in this thread. I can second ZM. The parent's stated issues with ZM were likely related to config/hardware issues rather than the software itself. Lastly, I would recommend the cameras with IR because unless you like your entire place brightly lit most IR-less cameras will not take very good pictures in the dark.

    11. Re:Went through it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, you rely on a video saved on a server, to catch burglars in your home? ..

      What if they take the video server?

  33. I've found... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you leave a corpse on your lawn people normally don't pester you.

    Of course, you need some privacy or the cops can be a real pain.

  34. Zone minder really is excellent by niftydude · · Score: 1

    Stable too.

    the only problem with using it for home security is if the burglars steal your server when they break in...

    Seriously though, I use zoneminder, it has a really slick web interface, easy to configure, any camera supported by v4l2 is supported, there's also a nice plugin for mythtv - so if you use myth as your htpc - you can view your security recordings, or your live camera feeds on your tv.

    Just make sure you have an offsite backup - otherwise burglars will steal your recordings of them

    Video surveillance isn't really a deterrent though - a rather useful deterrent for nerds (which is actually more successful than it should be) - is to use a home automation system (like X10) to turn on house lights/tv etc, on a schedule - so if you aren't home in the evening, it will look like someone is to anyone who is scoping your place out for a burglary.

    --
    You can never know everything, and part of what you do know will always be wrong. Perhaps even the most important part.
    1. Re:Zone minder really is excellent by idle12 · · Score: 1

      Couldn't you set it up so if web cam detected motion then use X10 to say, turn on some lights, TV and maybe play a dog barking on your stereo?

      A theif is going to be jump as it is. If weird stuff starts happening and/or he think someone is home, it might be enough to spook him.

    2. Re:Zone minder really is excellent by niftydude · · Score: 1

      Definitely yes!
      I have mine set up to play a tone through the stereo whenever someone walks up my front entranceway - but that isn't via X10 - it's via a perl script running on my HTPC, and it is more for alerting me, rather than freaking out thieves.

      What you say is definitely possible though.

      --
      You can never know everything, and part of what you do know will always be wrong. Perhaps even the most important part.
  35. Zoneminder by tanderson92 · · Score: 1

    Zoneminder works flawlessly here with multiple cameras, despite not being updated for a year.

    As to its features, it is very good at detecting motion, even when the area of motion is small compared to the whole frame. And you can playback all activity so you can know for sure if anyone has been acting suspicious so as to keep your guard up. I'd definitely recommend it, but with other security, because 1) a camera can't see everything 2) a camera won't stop a breakin.

  36. Dropcam by devil_doll · · Score: 1

    Anybody tried Dropcam?

    http://www.dropcam.com/

    Small Wi-Fi cameras that stream to a cloud service and provide remote viewing from the web or an iPhone. Offsite storage is pretty cool - if the camera gets stolen, you can still watch the recorded footage.

    Wish it ran Linux though. :-)

    1. Re:Dropcam by isometrick · · Score: 1

      Hey, that's where I work! Thanks for the link!

      Let me know if you guys have any questions -- email is greg at our domain.

      Funny enough, the cameras do run Linux, but we're not 100% open source .... yet. :)

  37. It's called "renter's insurance" by Tintivilus · · Score: 1

    Get renter's insurance. Seriously. I don't think I ever had a policy priced at more than $100/year. If you also have a reasonably late-model car you can usually get a "multi-policy discount" that's greater than the cost of the renter's policy.

    Surveillance equipment is just something else to be stolen if there's a breakin.

  38. $10/month should be cheap enough.. by lazn · · Score: 1

    install the system yourself from: http://www.safemart.com/

    then sign up for their $10/month monitoring..

    that or a big dog.

  39. Area denial with pepper spray. by couchslug · · Score: 1

    http://www.stopthecrime.com/faqs.aspx

    Fog the place and the bad guys can't hang around.

    --
    "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  40. Guns. Lots of guns. by Randseed · · Score: 1

    Guns. Lots of guns. And flamethrowers. And electrify all the door knobs by hooking them to 220V mains.

    1. Re:Guns. Lots of guns. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Using automated devices capable of injury is illegal. A person who used a gun can use the defense that their life was in danger. There is no such defense as, "my shit was going to be stolen."

  41. Start with the basics by Walter+Wart · · Score: 1

    1) Renters insurance 2) A solid core door, preferably steel-clad 3) A German Shepherd or other large protective breed of dog 4) A shotgun

    --
    The man who never alters his opinion is like the stagnant water and breeds Reptiles of the Mind -- William Blake
  42. Re:What's that coming over the hill? Is it a monst by HBoar · · Score: 1

    I've always thought a baboon would be good.

  43. Four Words: Fry's Electronics by socz · · Score: 4, Informative

    So, SOMEONE slashed my motorcycle tires. I didn't want that to happen again since those particular tires are expensive for my bike (whitewalls). I went to Fry's and realistically spent about $2,000 on hardware. Now, I KNOW I am not going to keep all of it, but I just wanted to see what worked best for my needs. About 3 trips later I ended up with:


    # $250-$350 4 channel DVR (I don't remember how much but it was the cheapest decent recorder).
    # 1 $275 + tax wireless camera with receiver. (awesome quality and sound!)
    # 1 "bullet cam" that is not tiny, but small enough to be hidden in plants. It is wired. Maybe $50?


    I later returned the Fry's DVR and got one off of newegg for $100 +tax and shipping, though I had to provide a SATA drive that I already had.

    I also spent a bit more, like $80 on 8 D cell rechargeable batteries, and then like $145 on a powermaxx (best company EVER) for a D charger with 4 batteries. Although I had a wireless camera, I had no where to plug it in. So I made a battery pack. My #'s indicate I could run that camera for at least 24 hours with consistent connection and quality, then about 12 more hours and it got dimmer, crappier video quality and less night time infrared abilities as the batteries died.

    Thanks to Fry's excellent return policy, the only thing you lose is your time! But I was able to return all that went unused. Here are some things to avoid: Small/tiny wireless cameras: their quality and resolution sucks. Avoid very expensive cameras as that they'll be no better than middle range cameras. Don't worry about the DVR, they all pretty much suck. Don't use your PC as a DVR, pretty much most people have problems with it. Oh, and of all the DVRs I used, all of them had issues being accessed through the internet.

    Someone ended up stealing that wireless camera, and I have that on DVR! My buddy put it on youtube for me: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IE0NkvA1uh4

    I ended up buying another 2 of those cameras and mounted them high up and attached securely to the wall.

    If you want more info on what exactly I bought, feel free to email me.

    --
    My abilities are only limited by my imagination
    1. Re:Four Words: Fry's Electronics by Jester6641 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This could be a good case study. Someone stole your camera and you have a great shot of their face. Am I to understand you still don't have any identification or progress in this case? You haven't recovered anything? That video was dated December 28, 2009. Anything new since then? I'm being honest here, I'm not trying to be snarky, but that doesn't sound at all like you had any success with your system. I know it's hard to quantify the thefts that hadn't happened because of this, but it's hard to justify on account of the one that did.

      --
      Jester

      Warning: This sig may be legally binding in England.
    2. Re:Four Words: Fry's Electronics by GrumblyStuff · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Heh, you make an earlier comment all the more insightful.

    3. Re:Four Words: Fry's Electronics by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 1

      i find it hilarious that someone stole part of your security system.
      that said, your advice is most helpful.

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
    4. Re:Four Words: Fry's Electronics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't help but notice that your video of the camera being stolen is from December of last year and you haven't nabbed the perp... doesn't seem like the equipment has really helped much.

    5. Re:Four Words: Fry's Electronics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Really? I mean REALLY?

      You spend x hundreds of dollars on a "security" system, only to have part if it stolen. You end up in one of the most optimistic situations for the system: using your "security" system to capture the perpetrator in the act of theft. Hell, you even have the guy's face and voice on video and have crowd sourced a search for him (youtube + slashdot), but you still can't get your property back.

      What REAL value did you get for you X hundreds of dollars + time?

    6. Re:Four Words: Fry's Electronics by socz · · Score: 1

      You are correct sir! I can not take action myself, because that might HURT my case. So, I had to rely on the police. So, regardless of all the "other things happening," they basically didn't care (the detectives since there has been 2 with my case).

      I have a good idea of where this person could be found, but I can't do anything. The worst part about this, is that when it happened, I heard that dudes car pulling up. I was walking to the front of my apartment building. As the guy left, I was walking back. Since I had it hooked up to an extra lcd monitor I had, I noticed "no connection." I Immediately ran out when I realized I was looking at the dudes crotch in my security display lol.

      So, as you can assume, there is more footage. The guy took the cam into his car, took off with it and the camera still transmitted until it was out of range. Very frustrating!

      --
      My abilities are only limited by my imagination
    7. Re:Four Words: Fry's Electronics by socz · · Score: 1

      Well, I am glad you're amused lol. No really, I was really upset at first but it did help me out and will continue to help me out in my cause.

      As I said in another post, there is no way that guy could have known what was in that box. What was your opinion of what you saw? Mine is that he went right for it. As you can see, there are 2 cars parked there, and behind one car (on the right) is my motorcycle. This guy had to turn sideways to get in and take it. JUST that box. Isn't that weird?

      That's why I say it's someone who knew it was there, as someone who came to do something and was like wtf is that and left. I have images of that person too, but as the police said "you can't implicate them because you have NO PROOF." Even though that bastard was never seen before or since.

      At that time, I was trying to catch someone in the act, instead of preventing. The camera was entirely stealthed out. All of the LEDs that could give it away were modified so they gave off no light. So as far as anyone (including the neighbors), there was a box amongst other boxes. After that, the camera and battery pack were mounted high up where once you're in the garage, you're on film and you can't get to it easily. Even then, you'd have to destroy it or rip out a huge chunk of wall to get it lol.

      What we all wonder though, is what did that guy do once he realized it was wireless? Must have been exciting for a couple of days eh?

      --
      My abilities are only limited by my imagination
    8. Re:Four Words: Fry's Electronics by socz · · Score: 1

      As I mentioned in another post, it was unfortunate (I actually feel worse for losing THOSE powerexx batteries than the camera itself!) but it will help me in my case later on.

      Also, whats ~$250 plus 4 batteries compared to my white wall tires that come in @ over $300 each? Plus towing, plus inner tubes, plus getting them replaced/balance? Seriously, say ~$300, it's an amount I'll EASILY and HAPPILY lose ANYTIME compared to what would have happened without it.

      So no, I'm not worried about getting that camera back, I'm worried about having to spend MORE money than that again. Hope that answers your question.

      --
      My abilities are only limited by my imagination
    9. Re:Four Words: Fry's Electronics by socz · · Score: 1

      It helped me win part of my case, which is worth the expense in itself and it'll do more good in the future. :>

      --
      My abilities are only limited by my imagination
  44. Security systems don't work by realmolo · · Score: 1

    The ONLY truly effective security measure is to hire armed guards. You probably can't afford that. For the average non-wealthy person, the best thing is a dog. Get a big dog that will bark when people open the door or break a window. Most will do that without any training, especially at night.

    Security systems don't prevent break-ins, and if you can't prevent them, then what's the point?

  45. Cameras for an apartment complex by phorm · · Score: 1

    For myself, I'd be happy to use a linux-based system. However, I have a request by somebody else who wants security for an apartment complex.

    I can probably handle setup, but I want something that's low-fuss so that I don't end up having to babysit it.

    Can anyone comment on systems Like these, for indoor/outdoor (doorways and parking area) surveillance, or make other recommendations?

  46. Is this /. or forums.NRA.com? by tobiah · · Score: 0

    Seriously, there are more "guns" solutions than there are high-tech solutions. Where are the geeks?

    --
    "The ability to delude yourself may be an important survival tool" - Jane Wagner -
    1. Re:Is this /. or forums.NRA.com? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously, I've seen more high-tech solutions than there are "guns" solutions. I've also seen more "dogs" solutions than "guns" solutions but you didn't ask if this was forums.akc.org. Methinks you have a case of ballistiphobia.

    2. Re:Is this /. or forums.NRA.com? by catmistake · · Score: 0

      Seriously, there are more "guns" solutions than there are high-tech solutions. Where are the geeks?

      The gun owning ones? Dead. or maimed. Self-inflicted, accidental. or in jail for involuntary manslaughter for killing their child or loved one, unintentionally, of course. And statistically speaking, that is. Numbers don't lie, you insecure freaks. Oh... there was that one... that one in 250,000 incidents that actually did get to use his gun effectively and stopped the crime. Good for him. The other 249,999 just weren't quick enough, or got nervous, or something... forgot to point in the corner while cleaning, or incompetantly left a round chambered when unwisely letting their child see with their hands. Yes, tragic (as in ironically caused their own downfall).

    3. Re:Is this /. or forums.NRA.com? by element-o.p. · · Score: 1

      REAL geeks prefer solutions that work. Poser geeks like solutions that look cool but provide poor results. There's not a security camera in the world that provides nearly as much deterrent to a would-be burgler as the sound of a 12-gauge being cocked in the night. If you must add tech to the home security solution, add night-vision goggles and/or a laser pointer to your shotgun.

      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
    4. Re:Is this /. or forums.NRA.com? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Care to cite your numbers? We know they're just bullshit. When you have to make up bullshit to support your views you know your ideals are pretty weak.

    5. Re:Is this /. or forums.NRA.com? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Forget his numbers. When was the last time you even heard that someone successfully used their gun to prevent crime against themselves (cops don't count)? Yet we hear about stupid gun deaths all the time... anacdotal, sure. A couple Google searches will reveal this truth: many many many more accidental gun deaths than crime twarted with a citizen's gun. But, then, they'll tell you it's all about deterrence, and not blowing someone away. Except in TX, where they actually keep score.

    6. Re:Is this /. or forums.NRA.com? by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      I'd like to see the citations for your numbers.

      I live in an area where gun collecting, clay shooting, sport course shooting, still target shooting, hunting, and just putting ammo into cans are common hobbies. I remember far more deadly beating around here than accidental gun deaths.

      Accidental deaths tend to be in the form of cars, motorcycles, ATVs, boats, and farm machinery. Accidental gun deaths are caused when people with no respect for the power and utility of firearms pick them up at the corner shop without sufficient training.

      About 30% of Americans polled by Gallup own firearms personally and 40% say they have a gun in their home. 47% of men in some demographic groups personally own at least one firearm.

      In 2001, 800 to 900 gun deaths were accidental in the US. About 11,000 were homicides, and the biggest number -- about 58% of all gun-related deaths in 2001 -- were suicides. Other sources have higher numbers, but I didn't find anything higher than 1,500 annually in a quip that sounds extremely anti-firearm in a top-ten list of accidental deaths.

      Now, since there are around 300 million people in the US and around 300 million firearms, I'd say less than 1000 accidental deaths is much better than the situation for accidental death for motorists and passengers in cars (33,040 of whom died in 2005) or bicyclists (of whom 784 died in 2005, but at 3 to 11 times as many deaths per mile as those in cars).

      About 5,000 people die from food poisoning each year in the US, with about 1,800 of those dying from known pathogens. Seventy-five percent of those known pathogens are strains of just three pathogens: Salmonella, Listeria, and Toxoplasma.

      Remember that top ten list I mentioned? Firearms accidents were listed at #7, although if using other sources for the number they would have fallen possibly at #8 or #9.

      Death by gases (poisoning and asphyxiation) are in the same neighborhood as accidental gun deaths. Suffocation (choking blocking the respiratory tract or asphyxiation just due to lack of oxygen and not some other gas getting in its way) is double or more, as are fire-related deaths and drownings.

      Roughly double the items in the previous paragraph to find 8,600 people per year lethally poisoned by solids or liquids including truly poisonous foods but not foods contaminated by infectious food-borne pathogens like salmonella.

      Almost double that again to find that nearly 15,000 people plunge to untimely deaths each year.

      Motor vehicle crashes (accounting for over 43,000 fatalities per year according to their unnamed sources) lead by a huge margin. That's more than suicides, homicides, and accidental deaths by gun put together.

      I guess it's time to tell people about the dangers of letting their loved ones around ladders, stairs, food, and especially cars.

    7. Re:Is this /. or forums.NRA.com? by catmistake · · Score: 1

      This wasn't my idea... but the anonymous coward that responded to the other response. So I give him credit for the idea. Google is enlightening.

      accidental gun deaths: 11,800,000 results

      gun twarts crime | gun stops crime: 1,050,000 results

      Interesting, isn't it? I suppose you'll say that not all crime twarted is reported, but you know that's bull... if anything, the accidental gun deaths are boring news... stop a crime with your gun? that's almost national news material.

      I don't have a citation for you. But I've seen the numbers not even the NRA can deny: accidental gun deaths are pretty damn popular, and exponentially (yup... that's a factor of 10, baby) more popular than that 1 in a million shot to actually get to protect yourself with your gun (where you actually discharge your weapon, not wave it around as a deterrent).

      I will say this, however. If I had a daughter, and she worked late in a sketchy part of town, say, a waitress at the local strip of bars, and would always leave work with cash, I'd like her to be proficient with and carry a gun. So, if there is a rational reason to carry, then do so. BUT, if you just LIKE GUNS for the sake of guns, or if you are severly paranoid, and have NO RATIONAL REASON for carrying, meaning, in your mundane life, you just never enter into sketchy situations (like me! For whatever reason, I'm always pretty safe), then carrying or owning a gun will only hasten your mortality. Statistically speaking.

    8. Re:Is this /. or forums.NRA.com? by muckracer · · Score: 1

      > Seriously, there are more "guns" solutions than there are high-tech solutions. Where are the geeks?

      On the shooting range...

    9. Re:Is this /. or forums.NRA.com? by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      ummmmmmmm.... no.

      The number of times anti-gun nuts, pro-gun nuts and people between those extremes write the phrase "accidental gun deaths" on a page is not a count of anything more than exactly that. It's not a count of accidental deaths. It's not even a pro or anti argument related to guns. It's just a count of pages that contain that phrase. The phrase could be included in "accidental gun deaths aren't a major problem statistically", "the many horrors of runaway accidental gun deaths" or even "accidental gun deaths are good because they remove stupid people from the gene pool".

      Your statistics mean nothing other than the popularity of a phrase, not how often there is an accidental gun death.

      The supposed word "twarts" isn't even spelled correctly. Just spelling that correctly as "thwarts" returns a higher meaningless statistic than what you report for "twarts" and "stops" together.

      Furthermore, "accidental gun deaths" is a coherent phrase that is a natural and quite likely phrasing for the idea. Prevention of a crime could be

      • "thwarts"
      • "stops"
      • "prevents"
      • "interrupts"
      • "curtails"
      • "mitigates"

      or half a dozen other words in different orders:

      • "crime is prevented by a gun",
      • "gun mitigates a crime"
      • "hero interrupts commission of a crime"

      or many more.

      Also, crimes are many: robbery, murder, rape, burglary, theft, carjacking, kidnapping, assault... so searching for just "crime" doesn't even get you the useless statistic you're claiming you have.

      Learn a bit about logic and reading comprehension before you try to move on to debate. Your whole argument is trash. Have a nice day.

  47. ZoneMinder is not all it could be by hkz · · Score: 5, Informative

    As someone who's been trying to whip up ZoneMinder into a marketable state for over a year now, I have to say it's not all it's made out to be. The capture daemons are brittle and crash frequently due to resource and memory leaks. When they exit abnormally, they always do so with the same code 255, and don't produce workable logs. Timestamps of " 1 january 1970" happen all the time, which mess up the timeline view of events. The web front end is arcane, spartan, and really time-intensive to learn. (E.g. clicking on a monitor's name does something different from clicking on its IP address, even though both screens go to a different subset of camera settings. The difference between a "modect with no zone" and a "monitor" is arbitrary. All the different camera "modes" are strange in my opinion. That there's ten different ways to view events is weird. And so on. It's not unlearnable, but it's far, far from usable.)

    So instead of just whining, I patched a lot of these issues, along with adding some new cameras to the database and improving the translation for my native language. I sent the maintainer a pretty nice patch set, if I say so myself. Guess what? Absolute silence, never heard anything back. Which I could live with, if my patches at least showed up in the next release. But no new releases for over a year. So my patience with this project is pretty much over.

    1. Re:ZoneMinder is not all it could be by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Please publish your patchset somewhere. Then if someone forks Zoneminder they'll have some nice new features for v+1

    2. Re:ZoneMinder is not all it could be by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fork it?

    3. Re:ZoneMinder is not all it could be by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice video...I like how the thief couldn't even be bothered to get off his cell phone in order to take your "hidden" camera...

    4. Re:ZoneMinder is not all it could be by jasno · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yep - If the maintainer is out to lunch you would be doing us all a favor by forking it.

      --

      http://www.masturbateforpeace.com/
    5. Re:ZoneMinder is not all it could be by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      We are about to replace ZoneMinder (100+ cams writing to a NAS via NFS) with the stuff from Curtis over at bluecherry.net . Ubuntu with hardware cars, web UI or full client. We are pumped. Every fricken proprietary DVR is a closed system with little control over the format or locaiton of your video storage. For instance, we have bluecherry installed at a body shop and the video clips automagically push out to cloud based storage, just incase some smart theif finds the video server and swipes that.

      Like it so much I am putting a 4 port in my old PC in the basement at the house.

      Good stuff.

      RG in KC

    6. Re:ZoneMinder is not all it could be by MrCool80s · · Score: 1

      Did you make your patch set available on the forums for other users? (Pointer?)

    7. Re:ZoneMinder is not all it could be by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fork.

      Please.

    8. Re:ZoneMinder is not all it could be by knothead99 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Please fork and put your code up on github. That's probably the easiest way to whip up a new community around your new codebase.

    9. Re:ZoneMinder is not all it could be by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fork it.

      Or release your patches.......?

    10. Re:ZoneMinder is not all it could be by RichiH · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Join #zoneminde on irc.freenode.net tell your story and wait a day or three. Sucks, but tends to yield results.

    11. Re:ZoneMinder is not all it could be by mcrbids · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Sounds to me like a fork is in order... you find the project useful enough to patch it, why not just fork the project if you aren't getting any traction?

      Don't think you are getting into some obligation, you aren't. You are no more obligated to do anything than the guy you're pulling a fork from, you will see your good work benefit the community, and you just might save the project over the long haul.

      --
      I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    12. Re:ZoneMinder is not all it could be by emj · · Score: 1

      That's what's nice with places like github and all the git like webservices, you can actually see peoples patches. Really nice.

    13. Re:ZoneMinder is not all it could be by fl!ptop · · Score: 1

      You are no more obligated to do anything than the guy you're pulling a fork from, you will see your good work benefit the community, and you just might save the project over the long haul.

      I agree. Although, in my own experiences w/ zoneminder, I've found that it's not so much the software itself but also shitty firmware on the cameras. I've seen cgi's that return a snapshot only 60-75% of the time (other times returning a blank screen or crashing). Since zoneminder works w/ these cgi's I'm wondering if the problem isn't just the software but a combination of that and the camera's firmware.

      --
      When you recognize love in another and realize how precious it is, everything else seems so insignificant.
    14. Re:ZoneMinder is not all it could be by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please, if you haven't done so, post your patches and fixes in the Zoneminder user contribution forum (http://www.zoneminder.com/forums/viewforum.php?f=9) and the bugfixes wiki page (http://www.zoneminder.com/wiki/index.php/ZoneMinder_1.24.2_Bugfixes)

    15. Re:ZoneMinder is not all it could be by hkz · · Score: 1

      Good honest question. Here's why:

      - I hack ZoneMinder for profit on company time. I have no personal interest in getting the package to work, since I don't personally need or use the software. If I forked, I'd get a lot of correspondence from people, which my employer will not let me answer on their dime. On my own dime, I have other projects.
      - C++ and Perl are not my fortes. Shell and C are. So I'm not the chosen one.
      - I am a Slackware person. Most of the ZoneMinder folks are Debian people. This clashes. I "corrected" a lot of assumptions that didn't hold on Slackware, but I wouldn't want to bench an alien codebase against an alien platform.

      So this is just not for me, sorry. I will probably release my patches to the ZoneMinder forums though, for what it's worth, even though I hate jumping through hoops to generate a "username" and a "password" for a one-time contribution, and prefer to mail the maintainer.

  48. Tazer traps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tazer traps, everywhere.

  49. Rent Home Alone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think Home Alone covered this subject....

  50. I'm planning one myself by MadGeek007 · · Score: 1

    I plan on using the PowerMax+
    http://www.homesecuritystore.com/p-755-visonic-powermax-powermax-plus-wireless-home-security-system.aspx

    And the GSM unit to be able to control the system via touch-tones and SMS. The system is highly scalable and configurable; so you can expand the system as your budget allows.
    http://www.homesecuritystore.com/p-755-visonic-powermax-powermax-plus-wireless-home-security-system.aspx

  51. And a safe for when you're not there to guard it by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 3, Interesting

    a gun

    And a good safe to store it in when you're away somewhere you can't take it with you. (Some jurisdictions blame YOU if a neighborhood gangsta lifts it and uses it somewhere else. So you don't want to depend on locked cases or hidey-holes.)

    Get a fire safe. Not only do they help protect stuff against damage in a fire, they're double-walled with a layer of firebrick between the walls. This makes them heavy enough that it takes a special piece of equipment to move them. So the bad guys can't just haul it off somewhere else to crack it ^even if you don't bolt it to the floor with the locknuts inside).

    and if that doesn't work: more gun.

    Once you've got enough "stopping power" to make the threat credible and follow through if you're called, you don't need to go larger. As McClary's law of firepower says: "You can't stop a bullet with a bigger bullet." Which in this case means "they can't". Housebreakers don't go in for (ineffective) arms races. They are more into avoiding "houses that shoot" in favor of less dangerous prey.

    Decent sized pistol for one-on-one or few-on-one, shotgun if mobs-on-one might be an issue, and you're golden.

    For home defense load your 12-gauge shotgun with fine birdshot loads, like number 40: It's just as effective as 00 if there's nothing but air between gun and target - but gets stopped by a couple layers of drywall at any significant distance - so you don't need to include the neighbors in the exercise. Fragmenting or greatly expanding hollowpoint bullets (such as "Golden Saber" or "Silvertip") in the pistol for the same reason (and also so it doesn't go THROUGH the bad guy and hit the neighbors if the perp is such a fool that you actually have to fire.)

    According to FBI stats, safest (in terms of victim injury/death percentages) defense (by a BUNCH) is with-gun, next safest is knuckling under, and everything else is far worse.

    Mandatory mindset: IF you have picked up the gun you have ALREADY DECIDED that you WILL fire if the perp attacks despite it. Get that figured out in your head before considering picking up the gun - or even getting one for self/home defense. You need to already be past that internal conflict to fire in time if it is necessary.

    Take the NRA "Personal Protection" firearms course - before deciding what (if any) gun to buy or dedicate for the purpose. Excellent, cheap, customized for your area and its laws, taught by certified instructors with the legal issues handled by an official of the jurisdiction. A weekend's instruction (or several evening sessions) and you'll have the skills, competence, and understanding of the law and its fallout necessary to know when to defend and do it properly.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  52. Adopt a dog by suburbanmediocrity · · Score: 1

    Best security system available. At least according to an insurance adjuster relative who told me that security systems don't work. Plus you can have a wonderful companion and maybe even save a life,

    1. Re:Adopt a dog by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      Strange how nobody ever mentions all the dog shit...

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    2. Re:Adopt a dog by strider5 · · Score: 0

      perhaps the real deterrent is the overwhelming odor of dogshit upon entry?

      --
      "All that glitters is not gold"
  53. You want a nice record of the theft? by digital+photo · · Score: 1

    Here's the question: Do you want to just record a nice video of your stuff being stolen or do you want to stop the theft from happening?

    Security isn't just cameras and sensors. It's also physically locking stuff down, securing things so that people can't just pick them up and walk off with them.

    I like the idea of an active defense system that will help prevent theft, but let's face it... that won't fly in any court of law. Still.. you can use non-lethal means.

    First off, get a real security company to come do an audit and have them set something up. Get plenty of those security stickers and flags. Yes, put them up.

    Second, consider nailing or "earthquake proofing" things with tie downs and bolts. You can't move a big screen quickly if it's been bolted to the wall/table/etc.

    Third, get a good strong safe, make sure it's bolted down or otherwise secured in place. This is where your valuables should ideally go.

    Fourth, get sound based pain field generators and tie that to your DIY sensors and such. Ie, if windows open or glass broken, pain field blast. If a sensor or trip occurs in key areas... like a drawer, or the safe is jostled... pain field generator. For the sadistic, I suppose you can install drop gates on all windows and doors to prevent the thieves from leaving... but that might be construed as torture.

    Tongue-in-cheek aside, most security kits are for ID'ing the perps... so get high resolution and plenty of storage. What's the point of a camera that doesn't record footage good enough? Also, place cameras in multiple angles. From high up, from down low, anywhere/place where it will increase the chance of getting a shot of their faces. Also, have cameras outside as well. Make sure the cameras can adjust to different light levels as well as have IR illumination to ensure proper viewing. Install dummy ones and hidden real ones...

    Oh. If you've got stuff you want to keep safe... home insurance policy. Keep a copy in the bank's safety deposit box, along with copies of receipts and such for stuff you have on the plan...

  54. Best bang for the buck is signage... by Phizzle · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Spend a bunch of signs stating that you got a badass security system using some respectable company names and stuff like 24/7 Remote Surveillance and either get a dog or one of those fake dog bark systems - they've come a long way - complete with rattling chains, random barks etc.

    --
    I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.
  55. Easy, get a dog. by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

    Aside from being terrific companions, dogs make a lot of racket when someone comes to the door.

    If you want to talk security systems, I have a Lynx wireless system that I installed myself in a couple of hours. I had verizon move the ONT into my basement with steel conduit to the box outside to protect the fiber from being cut. I have one pad in the kitchen and the master pad in our bedroom. My wife and I each have a keyfob for enabling and disabling it easily.

    I have about $400 in it with all the extra sensors for the house.

    And what would this post be without mentioning my firearms; a 4.5" .357 magnum revolver and a S&W 9mm semi-auto, both of which I am extremely proficient in and unafraid to use.

  56. Nothing deters a thief... by hoytak · · Score: 1

    ... like a rampaging herd of tiny yipping dogs with 10khz barks.

    --
    Does having a witty signature really indicate normality?
    1. Re:Nothing deters a thief... by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 1

      If i'd not already posted, i'd mod you hilarious.

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
  57. Real and useful information to be found by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Take a look at http://www.nononsenseselfdefense.com/propertycrime.html

    It has great information on all kinds of things including real world home safety.

  58. What you need is... by bugs2squash · · Score: 1

    A copy of an Indiana Jones movie for reference, a large rock, a chisel and a ramp. Oh, and some kind of triggering device based on twisted vines.

    --
    Nullius in verba
  59. multiple small advicelets by fred+fleenblat · · Score: 1

    1. you said apartment so a guard dog is probably not practical. more to the point, the insurance liability for a guard dog is way more expensive than any discount for having an alarm. but, if you're on the ground floor, you might get a leash, water and food bowls, half-empty kibble bag, pooper scooper, some (visibly used) chew toys, and a muzzle, then scatter them around the patio. extra points for getting some fake poop.

    2. to be effective, an alarm needs to be monitored by a "central station". two or three false alarms and the neighbors will call 9-1-1 to report you for your noisy alarm instead of reporting a possible burglary; you might be asked to disconnect it. central stations probably won't let you connect your own jury-rigged solution.

    3. just get proper insurance. for an apartment this is actually not very expensive, cheaper than basic cable in most cases.

    4. don't advertise that you have anything nice. don't poke any antennas out through the apartment windows. if you have a window facing the street or common area, don't put your art collection, 50" plasma, and multiple equipment racks in plain view. if you have assigned parking, don't park your BMW in a spot that is labeled with your apartment number.

    5. your car (if you have one) is more likely to be broken into than your apartment. get a top notch alarm for it, and never ever leave anything (valuable or not) visible. some people will break a window to steal $10 sunglasses. a stack of quarters in the coin holder and a GPS mount on the windshield is nearly irrestistable.

    6. rather than make a DIY alarm, I'd suggest buying a commercially available alarm product and installing it yourself. you're more likely to end up with a working system and will have the option of connecting to a central station.

    7. upgrade the physical security. get the add-on locks for patio doors and slider windows. deadbolts on all doors. double cylinder on doors with or near windows. have the locks rekeyed so prior tenants' copies won't work. get in the habit of closing the windows when you leave, no matter how hot it is. (in fact, it's my opinion that most of the value of the alarm is the feature where it reminds you that you left a window or door open.)

    8. consider more mundane measures like an inventory of your stuff, off-site backups of your computers, recording the serial numbers of everything (not just the expensive stuff)

    9. take a moment to consider on-line security. you will be way more upset at someone taking over your email account, sending your bank a password reset request, then transferring ALL of your money out of your account. protect your email accounts and all devices including phone with as much password security as they allow.

    10. move to a lower-crime area for some peace of mind. taking the attitude that you can solve a deep social problem with improvised technology is naive.

    1. Re:multiple small advicelets by eth1 · · Score: 1

      11. Close your garage door. Fully 50% of the burglaries in my city are open garages.

      As for moving to a lower-crime area, it might reduce the likelihood of robberies and home invasions, but the burglars are going to go where there's nice stuff to steal.

  60. DEfinition of "home security" by twisteddk · · Score: 3, Informative

    I totally agree. You can probably choose peace of mind cheaper than by putting up home security. But where's the fun in THAT ?

    What I did was ask myself: What do I want to secure, and how can I go about doing that.

    In my neck of the woods, home invasions, natural disasters and similar stuff is exceedingly rare, so my protection revolves mostly around physical access (thieves), crime prevention, identification and ofcourse with the modern day "smart house", also data access.

    While my budget wasn't exactly small, it was also not unlimited. So what I did was oder some cheap megapixel IP cameras. They hook up just nice to a simple linux box through a PoE switch. That pretty much takes care of identification. Should anyone like to come near my house, they're on record doing so. Most criminals dont want to get caught, so they avoid places that has cameras. Dont scrimp and buy a dummy. Thieves are NOT dummies, they know the difference.

    Crime prevention is a bit harder. The idea here is to deter offenders, and have them choose another target. Cutting down bushes to allow neighbors to see your doors and windows will help a lot. Thieves and other criminals prefer to work unnoticed. Getting a dog helps. As does stuff like a gate or similar access control systems that might deter thieves that pull up with a moving truck and clean you out under the guise of being movers. Also lock up your shed and tools whenever you're not using them. Many thieves use your own tools for breaking into your house. Leaving a crowbar next to your front door is nearly as good as leaving the key in the lock. Alarm systems might work aswell. Some thieves will shy away from them because it's easier to find a place with lesser security. Marking valuables with your name or or identfying marks will generally make thieves less likely to want your stuff, it'll be harder to fence.

    Securing physical access is more expensive, and cannot stand alone. Given enough time anyone can circumvent physical access blocks. But using them in conjuction with say, an alarm system that doesnt give a thief enough time to complete his obejctive will normally help. Locking up valuables in a safe is a good idea, but keeping the combination on the fridge door, not so much. Close windows when you're not at home. Use security glass, or film on your windows to prevent entry. Use two or three locks on your doors. Safety doors are also usefull. Hide stuff from plain sight, a thief will not (usually) know where you put your stuff.

    Personal safety, also important to some. With an alarm, you can also have an emergency response call button. These are pretty much standard. Keep it near/on you at all times if you're living in a high risk area/situation. Learning self defense is also easy and cheap. While I dont condone the use of weapons against people as a matter of principle, this may be needed in really bad areas. Use the lockdown mode on your alarm system at night or when you're not expecting company. Again, buy a dog. Dogs are easily trained to protect you.

    Computer safety: Well, the best firewall I ever saw was 3 feet of air. Good luck hacking a non connected network. Unfortunately, most people dont consider living offline an option. So keep strong passwords, use encryption when possible (with a different password), and change your passwords whenever you suspect someone has gotten a hold of it. Never use the same password for a lot fo serives. In general, hackers will try the "guessed" password on a LOT of services. Also install and keep up to date a firewall, anti spyware and anti virus software. Security through obscurity is also an option. I have yet to see a single virus on say... OS/2.... Downside is, I've also rarely seen any decent software ;)
    Also, use threaded internet services. While wireless seems cool, it's merely one more way to hack into your system.

    But like I said: Figure out your needs before you decide what's the solution.

    --
    --- To err is human... Am I more human than most ?
    1. Re:DEfinition of "home security" by oldspewey · · Score: 1

      Thieves are NOT dummies, they know the difference.

      I think you're being rather generous to a very broad cross-section of people. Some thieves are not dummies. But some thieves are complete fucking dummies. Go watch some of the videos on baitcar.com if you don't believe me.

      --
      If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
    2. Re:DEfinition of "home security" by noidentity · · Score: 1

      Most criminals dont want to get caught, so they avoid places that has cameras. Dont scrimp and buy a dummy. Thieves are NOT dummies, they know the difference.

      Could they tell whether you had a non-working camera? One with a network cable connected, but not even powered? Obviously you don't use a fake camera that freaking looks fake; it has to be a real shell and lense, etc., just not the electronics.

  61. Cheap ALARM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well I'm a (25 years) alarm technician converted to a computer technician and GOOD ALARM systems ar not cheap, and DIY is cheaper but you have to have some electronics (know how) to do something home made...

    If you'r mechanical enought, you can build a BOOBY TRAP, but that is not verry helpfull if you'r not ther to catch the BOOBY...

    I say it's all in the habit of people...

    First LOCK THE DOORS when you leave the home, then DONT BRAG about the expensive stuff you have EVEN TO FRIENDS, if you go for a long period HIDE YOU'R EXPENSIVE STUFF from you'r windows, have a naibour pick up you'r mail (as if you'r not gone), DONT PUT EXPENSIVE STUF BOXES TO THE GARBAGE...

    Be home wise... the opposite of above is all indications to thefs that HEY I'M GONN FOR THE WEEK END, I JUST BAUGHT A BRAND NEW 40" TV AND MY FRIENS KNOW FOR SURE...

    The cheapest way is having a friend or naibour to monitor you'r home while you'r gon...

    Hope this help!!!

  62. Get size 14-16 work boots from second hand store- by Katchu · · Score: 2, Funny

    Get size 14-16 work boots from second hand store and old issue of Guns & Ammo. Leave on front porch with a note on the door that says: "Bubba, Rufus, Jim Bob and I went to the store to get more beer and ammo. The pit bulls attacked the mail carrier this morning and things got out of hand. Not sure if Killer got involved, there was too much blood to tell. In any case all four of the pit bulls are in the house so you better wait outside till we get back."

    --
    Keep Doing Good.
  63. Digi-watcher by zoomshorts · · Score: 0

    This software works well for me. Motion is detected as changes
    in light intensity. You can run multiple instances of different
    USB web cams. I rigged one up in the new house, it logs activity
    around the house and in the house. Send the data to a remote server and
    you can see who is stealing your stuff. Cheap cams can be found
    on eBay, a powered USB hub and some cables. Google it.

    Sadly, my guns are usually in the safe.

  64. Re:DIY inferior? Not always. by element-o.p. · · Score: 1

    Meh...In the '90s, the DIY airplane guys were kicking the crap out of the General Aviation market. Nothing less sophisticated than a business jet was anywhere near as cool (read that as "had anywhere near the performance, value, and looks") as the amateur-built experimental airplanes. The Glasairs, Lancairs, etc. were miles (literally) and years ahead of anything that Cessna, Piper, etc. were building.

    --
    MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
  65. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Found this on the web awhile back:
    Use your Dropbox to keep abreast of happenings at your home while you’re away. Here’s how it works:

    Connect a motion sensor camera to your computer.
    Whenever the camera detects motion, it takes video.
    Set the camera software to save the video files, which should be shortenoughin length and low enough in resolution as to not be too huge of a file size, in your Dropbox folder after downloading the software.
    Now, you can just log in to your Dropbox, and check for videos.If there are videos, you know there has been motion at your house, and you can watch them to find out what’s going on!

  66. Re:What's that coming over the hill? Is it a monst by greenbird · · Score: 1

    most burglars agree the one truly effective deterrent that makes them go some place else, is a big dog.

    Had an alarm. What a pain in the ass. Can't count the number of false alarms. Most seemed to happen at 3 or 4 in the morning. There was no way to get back to sleep after all that adrenalin was pumping.

    Now I have 2 Dobermans. Sweetest dogs you'd ever meet. They like barking at people outside the house or fence though. Everyone in the neighborhood is terrified of them. I have signs on my fence with a profile of a doberman head that say "I can make it to the fence in 4.2 seconds. Can you?" That and a doggy door, MUCH better than any alarm system.

    --
    Who is John Galt?
  67. Go for an analog system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Use lots of tin cans & twine (or clear fishing wire that's not easily seen). This system cannot be defeated by power loss, intentional or accidental, or even a software hack. You could set up a mic to pick up the sound & a cell phone to dial the cops with a prerecorded msg too if you want to get somewhat technical/fancy.

    Brought to you by Cheapo Security Systems Inc.

  68. Dummy cameras by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Harbor freight as a batch of dummy cameras you can set up around the place. Good for deterence. Working cameras won't do more to deter, but may help catch the miscreant if the police can be bothered to investigate. Good luck with that in Philly, though.

    1. Re:Dummy cameras by kimvette · · Score: 1

      Fake cameras look fake unless you invest in real camera dome housings.

      Typical "dummy cameras" will not fool a pro.

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
  69. Re:And a safe for when you're not there to guard i by h4rr4r · · Score: 4, Informative

    Birdshot is not good even at across the room distances. It will not attain needed penetration. You don't want to hurt the bad guy you want to stop him.

    00 is fine, slugs are better. You don't care that what happens later, this ain't the movies and you need the bad guy to stop now.

    http://www.theboxotruth.com/

  70. Re:And a safe for when you're not there to guard i by xaosflux · · Score: 1

    Housebreakers don't go in for (ineffective) arms races. They are more into avoiding "houses that shoot" in favor of less dangerous prey.

    I can't be the only one that envisioned automatic "gun cameras" here can I?

  71. It by weaponsfree · · Score: 1

    Insurance doesn't deter crime, its an after-the-fact remedy. It replaces stolen possesions

    Oftentimes it doesn't even do that. An insurance check can't replace your family herilooms at any price.

    An alarm won't stop a quick smash-n-grab, but it will limit the amount of time that the criminal can spend in your residence pilfering your stuff. With a proper alarm and TL-30 rated safe, it's very unlikely that someone will walk out with the family jewels before the police arrive.

    That said, an alarm and a good safe are not cheap. Whether it's worth it depends on your risk and how many "priceless" items you would protect.

    To the OP's point, an alarm will add some degree of safety for your family. It's preferable to having a door or window open quietly in the middle of the night.

    My home was burglarized years ago, and while I've never been able to replace what was taken, I am most thankful that none of my family was at home when the break-in occurred.

  72. Re:And a safe for when you're not there to guard i by digitig · · Score: 1

    Yes, that should be really effective against burglars that call while he's out at work / out on a date / on vacation / ...

    What do you have that you have to spend your whole life sitting next to and guarding?

    --
    Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
  73. bahamut.salad@gmail.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm going to do something different from the others here - rather then tell you you don't need it like all the other useless posts, I'm going to actually try to help you.

    Experience: 6 years in the alarm industry. 5 of them as senior staff.

    Everyone has the stickers, they're so common they're hardly a deterrant. If you want to go the faux security route, then get the stickers and an old external alarm siren (they have the light on the outside and such). Don't get the metal ones, they rust and haven't been installed by reputable installers for a long time. There are burglars out there that know this, most alarms that still have them are either downpowered or just don't work. Get one of the new plastic ones. Don't hook it up to mains or a battery so that it flashes. If it's flashing, then that's a sign that the "alarm" has activated, and some would see this and say "well it false activates all the time anyway, so if I break in and it goes off, nobody will take any notice".

    I have encountered plenty of daring burglars who do break into houses with alarms. About 95% of the time when this happens they'll immediately run, fearing that the someone is on the way. The other 5%, well, your chances of getting them are 50/50. Half of them don't leave because they're absolute morons, and so get found very easily. The other half are very good at what they're do, and so unless you go the armed guard or never leave the house, you can't do anything about them.

    With most modern alarms you can set them up to dial to your cellphone (provided you have a landline it can call from) to notify you of the alarm activating, and to be honest you're going to find out about your alarm going off faster with this then with monitoring. The upside to having a monitoring service is that they will send a patrol if they can't get a hold of you, so if do the dial to cell thing you'd need to be dilligent with your cellphone. With dial to cell you can still have a security company respond at your request if you can't attend for whatever reason, but you'll need to make arrangements with a company for this beforehand (and they'll probably charge you something like $25USD a year just to have an account and to hold keys).

    I would recommend buying a basic Bosch/EDM Solution 880 (would highly recommend the ultima as it's more expandible, but the non-ultima version is still plenty good) pack off of fleabay. You need: The panel (the PCB, the transformer & box it resides in) a couple of sensors (PIR's, don't forget to pay the extra for Pet safe PIR's if you have them), a backup battery (7a/h battery), the appropriate keypad, an internal siren (peizo) and an external siren.

    Seeing as you'd be DIY'ing this I'd avoid wireless equipment as much as possible, RF interference can be very random, and even for experienced techs can be a long and painful process to diagnose and fix. It's best for you to just avoid it, at least until you're more accustomed to how these things work.

    If you need help or advice with the installation, configuration & options then you can contact me via this web page: bahamut.kicks-ass.org/contact/ (sorry I just don't want my email splashed around, work might not take kindly to it). I'm not in the US (nor do I have any buisiness partners there), and you probably are, so I have nothing to commercially/monetarily gain from helping you.

  74. Mine is for fire/etc by Shivetya · · Score: 1

    I have a home alarm system where the primary purpose to alert the authorities in case of fire. With two dogs at home during the day by themselves I figured it was worth piece of mind. With a simple placard by the front door alerting people that there are dogs in the house should an emergency to arise. If it deters someone from breaking in and sticking around to find the valuables while I am not home all the better.

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
  75. Re:What's that coming over the hill? Is it a monst by BeaverCleaver · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Dogs are useful and all, but bear in mind that your neighbours won't be very happy if the damn things bark all night, or whenever a pedestrian walks past your house. They will also be unimpressed if when you take the brutes for walkies you let them shit all over the sidewalk, nature strips, and their front lawns.

    OK, so maybe everyone else in your street should stop being so whiny about your lovely, loyal pets. This is true, but it's also true that if I saw a burglar breaking into the house of the redneck with the big noisy dogs that bark the whole damn night and shit where I walk, I probably wouldn't report that burglar.

    Social engineering. Make friends with the people next door, and look out for each other. That nosy neighbour who stays at home all day can be your greatest security asset if you're on good terms.

  76. Bayweb Thermostat and Security System by colinnwn · · Score: 1

    I just got a Bayweb internet enabled programmable thermostat and self monitored "security system". For $230 on Amazon I got it with a X10 motion detector. It uses this to determine if the home is vacant or occupied to set the temperature and notify you by SMS or email of intruders at specific times you set. It can also interface with other normally open or closed sensors like door and window sensors, either 1 or 3 wired sensors (depending on the model), and an unlimited number by X10.

    I'm going to set up my home server so both I and it will receive the notification emails, and it will then play my voice saying "Hey, get the F out of my house. The police have been called and are on their way," and it will also record for a while from a USB webcam, when intruders are detected.

    http://bayweb.com/mktg/webthermostat.php

  77. DIY home security? by blind+biker · · Score: 1

    What, you've never watched "Home alone"?

    --
    "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
  78. 16 TON WEIGHT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    unless the intruder is armed with a pineapple, then you are fucked

    1. Re:16 TON WEIGHT by daveime · · Score: 1

      Or a pointed stick.

  79. Go for the works man... by brokenin2 · · Score: 1

    I have a linux server for a file server at our house, and I'm building a pretty decent system on the very cheap (not just because it's cheap, but because it's fun too) using a few different technologies..

    My plan is to combine a few things into one system.. Security cameras, security sensors, and home automation including zoning. I'll list some of my resources below.. 90% of the battle is knowing what to look for..

    zoning: search for 'diyzoning' and follow links from there to the real stuff.. diyzoning is actually being replaced..

    automation:
    1wire automation and sensors (cheap gadgets of all sorts): www.hobby-boards.com
    you can find all sorts of other sites with 1wire and ibutton devices (ibuttons are a particular type of 1wire device, great contact based digital keys)
    zigbee: easy to find when searching, it's more expensive, but makes a wireless mesh network which is easier than wires.. I like wires though, so I don't know much about these..

    Security camera:
    I currently use anything that works with linux and use "motion" for watching the cameras.. it takes videos only of events.. if you've got it tweaked right, it can also make an excellent intrusion sensor, you just have to be careful you don't get false positives.. it's very tweakable though)
    Another security camera option that I've considered switching to is zoneminder.. It's got a web gui to make monitoring and configuration easier, but other than that it's very similar.

    Another thing to do with the security cameras is to use something like rsync to get copies of events off site in case your server is stolen.. with any luck you'll still have the video of the person stealing your server..
    I bought a card at a great price on ebay that takes 16 video inputs, and then I got balun's and cameras from www.dealextreme.com to hook to it.. easy as pie, and the $20 cameras from dealextreme have ir led arrays for pretty decent night vision..

    Well, that's about all I can think of right off the top of my head.. Don't let people tell you a system like this is useless unless you pay a ton of $$ for it.. Even if you don't get broken in to, or you do and they still get the stuff and get away with it (happens with monitored systems too, I've seen it often at my work) you'll still have a lot of fun with the tech. I love blasting through the time lapse videos that motion puts together for me..

  80. Re:And a safe for when you're not there to guard i by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, that should be really effective against burglars that call while he's out at work / out on a date / on vacation / ...

    Out? Of the house? What are you talking about? This is slashdot!

  81. Remember, tech solutions to societal problems - no by Whuffo · · Score: 1

    You need physical protection. It doesn't have to be Fort Knox, just visibly more secure than your neighbors. Thieves want quick and easy with a fast getaway. Physical protection includes a big dog, bars on the windows and doors, barrier fences, etc. Note well that your Zoneminder won't stop a thief, it will only serve as one more pawnable item to steal. Become aware of how laughably easy it is to break into your house and do something about it!

  82. Best DIY system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get an ELK M1 you can complete control and automate your house with it. Check this forum out for loads of info on dit security systems http://www.cocoontech.com/forums/index.php?act=idx

  83. Re:Don't. Buy insurance. by Xeno+man · · Score: 1

    You missed the point. That guy knew there was an alarm so he knew he had to be quick. He chose what he wanted to take and limited it to a single item. Without an alarm the guy may have decided to smash the window and go into the back and get the $500 items and as many as he could carry, or even get a friend to help get even more. The alarm didn't stop the robbery, no system will, but it limited it to a smash and grab that probably saved the cost of the system.

  84. Mantrapping by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    by Ragnar Benson

  85. Not worth it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I mean really, who pays attention to car alarms anymore? How many people REALLY get their stuff back or have a break in thwarted from some security stuff installed?

    Security only works well if the premises are never totally unoccupied and there is always an awake human on call who isn't a drunk loser. Everything else is more crap than not.

    Pro burglars know the local alarm companies and cops procedure, plus the timing. What they do sometimes is trip the alarm, wait the appropriate time for the cops to show up, determine it is a false alarm, then go in later after the cops leave. The cops think the second alarm is a false positive, so they don't bother showing up again.

    I found this out after friends of mine were robbed, and they had fairly decent electronic monitored alarms.

    And another thing, even having video is a big yawner for the cops, they *really* don't bother with residential burglary very much at all, just file the paperwork if required and that's it. They aren't going to track your stuff down based on some grainy video footage. They go out of their way to give any burglars plenty of time to leave the scene, the last thing a cop wants to do is confront a deranged crack or crank head in the act, especially now that they have "three strikes" laws and badguys know they are probably facing life if caught again. This means to them "fuck it, might as well try blasting my way out of this situation". The cops know this, so they sort of mosey onto the scene real slow like, if they bother to show at all. REALLY, your big screen video blaster and computer and junk laying around is not worth a cop risking a confrontation with a drug addict, so they don't do it for the most part. Your alarm will be an expensive reminder that not only are you out all your stuff, but also the cost of all the stupid alarm stuff.

    Cops motto is "get home alive after the shift"..they are NOT going to die for someone's TV, nor are they going to really leadfoot it there sirens blazing, and they aren't going to devote hundreds of thousands of dollars of detective overtime for someone's apartment full of next years pawnshop junk (which is what all electronic gadgets are today, expensive, in one year, cheap pawnshop junk).. And I know this from dating a lady cop, she told me this straight up. It's sort of an unwritten rule they have today.

    Alarms are peace of mind..that really don't work. Really robust steel doors and steel shutters work the best. If your insurance will drop rates to match a pro install, sure, what the heck, if not, pissed away money. Do it for the geek cool factor, as a hobby, but I hope people don't think this is really security either. Unless you are home and psychologically prepared and equipped to defend your domicile, you have no security.

      Dogs are really overrated unless they really are extremely large and vicious dogs (plural, you need two at least), which are a security threat as well, as they are more likely than not to choimp some innocent one day when they get away from you (and don't depend on alleged "trained" dogs to always be like TV/Movie dogs-they aren't) and an expensive pain in the ass to maintain. I mean, think about it, a can of bear pepper spray is like ten bucks, poof, your dogs are now ineffective. Or they will use something more poisonous than that, or instantly lethal, as in just some cheap .22 with a plastic pop bottle duct taped to the barrel, the poor mans "gun not loud for at least one shot" device.

    Home alarms are security theater at the best.

  86. Homeowner's (renter's) insurance by DeanPentcheff · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Seriously.

    Any security system, starting with a locked door, is simply a polite request to have your things left alone. Someone who chooses not to will not.

    If you're techie enough to have real data (including music, etc.), then make sure you have daily offsite backup. The hardware is trivial to replace (given money), but getting your information back requires an offsite backup.

    Anything else and you're basically wasting your time.

  87. make your place less attractive to thieves by lophophore · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I subscribe to the theory that thieves are lazy, they will seek out the easiest target.

    Technology will only get you so far. Video surveillance will show you the perps after the fact. Alarms might scare off kids and amateur criminals. Shotgun traps will get you thrown in jail.

    If you have ground floor windows, plant thorny bushes in front of them. Roses look nice. Invest in motion detecting exterior lighting. Put up a fence. Reinforce your doors. Install better locks. Make sure all points of access are easily seen by your neighbors and the police. Don't leave expensive stuff where it can be viewed from outside.

    The goal is to make your place a less attractive target than the neighbors.

    --
    there are 3 kinds of people:
    * those who can count
    * those who can't
    1. Re:make your place less attractive to thieves by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      Yeah, roses look nice,but people are talking down the expense and time of raising a dog. Have you ever tried to raise good-looking roses? Since the OP is in an apartment, planting anything in beds outside is probably out of the question, even if he is on the ground floor.

    2. Re:make your place less attractive to thieves by Szechuan+Vanilla · · Score: 1

      rosa rugosa, the wild rose, grows anywhere, in almost any soil (native soil is sand dunes), with minimal water, has lovely and fragrant flowers and HUGE thorns.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rosa_rugosa

      --
      This space intentionally left blank.
    3. Re:make your place less attractive to thieves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Disclaimer: I am not a burglar or any other kind of criminal. However, for about seven years I was a teenager. Stealing a few moments of awkward but excitingly forbidden intimacy with one's high-school girlfriend isn't exactly like stealing consumer electronics and jewelry, but the execution is similar enough to be instructive. Over the years, I've had a few opportunities to compare my experiences with those of actual burglars, and from that derived some insight into the differences between home security and security home theater.

      The problem with securing your home against thieves is that unless you have breaking and entering experience, you're given to inane ideas like "plant thorny bushes." Thieves aren't lazy, otherwise they'd find a source of income that doesn't require them to break into houses, carry things out, and then hawk them to a fence, all the while avoiding being arrested. Many thieves steal out of desperation, meaning they are highly motivated by something (like agonizing drug withdrawal) to steal your stuff. Playing that motivation against them is more effective than making it more difficult to act on it. Criminals also tend to plan ahead, and they know that CSI is just a TV show. Since the cops aren't going to bring in the all-star forensics team to analyze a burglary, the name of the game is minimizing exposure to potential intervention from a live person by any means necessary.

      First of all: fences. Yes, a fence impedes the criminal's access to the home - for about thirty seconds or so. If the criminal can find a thirty-second window to get over the fence without being seen, the fence is now hiding him to some degree. Assuming the criminal is unlucky enough to have an actual encounter with police, the fence is likely to be more of an impediment to the police than it is to the criminal. All donut jokes aside, the criminal can always relieve himself of the burden of your valuables; the police aren't about to shed their gear.

      Next, thorny bushes. If you have a wall around your home, like many suburban houses do, the criminal has all the time in the world to overcome the monumental threat of minor lacerations. He might just cut the rose bush down, or maybe put a heavy jacket over it and use it as a step-stool to climb through your window. If he's visible, he'll just have to live with a slight stinging sensation and the possibility that the cops might swab a bit of blood off the windowsill. Remember, there is no magic CSI machine that takes in a swab of blood and spits out everything up to the perp's mother's maiden name.

      Motion detecting exterior lighting relies on the human element. Your house could be lit up like the Las Vegas strip; it won't matter if nobody's paying attention anyway. Assume the cops are busy with curfew violations or speeding tickets turned possession charges. Even the most caring and vigilant of neighbors is going to quit looking over at your house the twentieth time the light goes off and there's nothing there but a cat. Besides, your neighbors have to sleep too. Also keep in mind that motion detector exterior lighting has blind spots and glass light bulbs, and that burglars are given to carrying blunt instruments and a disregard for property. Remember, crowbars don't leave fingerprints for Lt. Caine to examine with his magic flashlight.

      I'd also like to chastise the people suggesting that a dog is good home security. You may scare off a criminal... or you may get the dog killed with a crowbar and all your stuff stolen anyway. You may also install a doggie door. I'm not a huge guy, but I'm not small (6'1"), and I can fit quite easily through a doggie door. You might as well leave the back door open.

      Speaking of which, any security measures are hilariously useless if you have a sliding glass door on the back of your house. It's often completely obscured from view and it's quick, easy and almost silent to unlock. Punch a hole with a screwdriver, reach in and undo the lock. The door manufacturers try to resolve this by adding more and different lo

  88. Re:And a safe for when you're not there to guard i by confused+one · · Score: 2, Informative

    What the hell is #40 birdshot? fine sand? There's a #4 birdshot and #4 buckshot. #4 buckshot works well against human sized targets and is the minimum anyone usually recommends for self defense.

  89. A big dog by evil+crash · · Score: 1

    Get a good sized dog, and don't feed it that often, and a good insurance policy.

    --
    "Anyone who is capable of getting themselves made President should on no account be allowed to do the job."-THG
  90. What you need by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    12 guage automatic shotgun with 50 round drum/clip...BRI sabbot rounds are optional!

  91. Go wireless networked burglar alarm by elronxenu · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I use the Scientech LS-30 which is a device supporting several types of wireless sensors including PIR (infra-red), reed switch, glass breakage detector, smoke detector, medical alert button and wireless outdoor alarm.

    The alarm system can report a break-in, fire or medical emergency via PSTN or SMS. It's very programmable, with support for lots of different zones, X10 home automation switches, day-of-week and time-of-day mode setting, doorbell and so on.

    The LS-30 has accessories including a GSM module (for sending alerts via SMS) USB interface and also ethernet interface.

    I wrote the LS30 project to allow me to control and monitor the device from linux. There's a daemon which connects to the alarm's ethernet port; it proxies commands (from clients on my machine) and events (alerts / status updates) from the device.

    I have daemons to watch for particular events (e.g. door open/close), logging the activity rates of PIR sensors (movement detection is reported by the unit even when disarmed) and burglaries (so the computer knows and can react accordingly e.g. by sending SMS messages or twitter).

  92. X10 by wiedzmin · · Score: 1

    Get the X10 security system. It's craptastic, but it's super cheap. Honestly, you won't be able to get anything DYI cheaper IMHO.

    --
    Bow before me, for I am root.
  93. Re:What's that coming over the hill? Is it a monst by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually the most cost effective and overall effective security solution is...

    Just slap a sticker or sign on your property for brinks security or anything like that.
    You can even go steal one.

    Dogs are expensive and dirty. And highly unreliable as security. The best trained 'security' dog will still eat the poisoned meat....

    If i'm lookin to break into somewhere. It wont be the place with the (fake) security sign.

    Cuz theres much easier targets out there. Religous anti-gun yuppy sub-division homes.

    They're pretty easy to spot. And theres alot of them.

    Not that i would have ever done anything like that.... Even in my younger days..

  94. Get a dog by JonStewartMill · · Score: 1

    They're the single most effective burglary deterrent. They're not exactly cheap to maintain, but probably cheaper than a monitored alarm system.

  95. Re:And a safe for when you're not there to guard i by digitig · · Score: 1

    Yes, but the questioner is already out of his mom's basement, so he's clearly not from around here. He's just getting a slashdotter to ask the question for him.

    --
    Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
  96. Best Security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    According to the latest FBI Criminal Statistics, almost no homes with moats have been robbed. Clearly this means that most burglars either can't swim, or are simply afraid of the possibility of being eaten in the moat.

    So...the best way is to install a moat around your house. And YOU can do it yourself.

    1. Re:Best Security by IMightB · · Score: 1

      don't forget to paint the car pink as well

  97. Re:What's that coming over the hill? Is it a monst by Rockoon · · Score: 4, Funny

    Dogs are useful and all, but bear ..

    I totally agree. A bear is much better than even several dogs. Even in the case of several intruders, while the dogs could tackle them both simultaneously, the bear makes short work of even the largest thug.

    --
    "His name was James Damore."
  98. Appropriate signage: by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 3, Funny
    • Trespassers will be shot.
    • Survivors will be shot again.
    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    1. Re:Appropriate signage: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Survivors will be prosecuted

    2. Re:Appropriate signage: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oopss....
      Honey, I've shot the postman!

    3. Re:Appropriate signage: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot the sign also says in big red letters "We do not fire warning shots"

  99. Lifeshield by nt4cats · · Score: 1

    I am a former employee of a company called Lifeshield (when I worked for them it was called InGrid, Inc.). Their product is excellent -- it is self-install, allows you to self-monitor and/or professionally-monitor and the company is run by a great group of people. I don't work there anymore, I don't own stock, there is no benefit to me if you or anyone gives them business. It is simply a good product and a good value IMHO.

    Their website is http://www.lifeshield.com/

  100. Here's a video with some of examples by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These should get you started. Hope it helps!

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aWeIxt_rvXA

  101. Re:And a safe for when you're not there to guard i by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 3, Informative

    I can't be the only one that envisioned automatic "gun cameras" here can I?

    Deadly-force mantraps are illegal essentially everywhere.

    Rule of thumb: In most jurisdictions you can only use deadly force to defend yourself (or another person of certain related classes) against a threat to life or limb. In some you can also use it to defend property under some circumstances.

    You can't delegate the decisions to machines - especially when you personally aren't there to be at risk. (It's not just their operation that's illegal. Even setting up such a device is one or more of several crimes.)

    Scenario: You're away (or died last month). Sheriff, firefighter, landlord, or heir shows shows up (with a warrant, probable cause, chasing smoke or flame, or coming to take possession of his property). "Sherrif, warrant!" / "Anybody in there? You're on fire!" / "Home at last! Let's get this door open and move in." Bash. BANG!

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  102. Re:What's that coming over the hill? Is it a monst by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 1

    this reminds me of that Dane Cook bit where he talks about how your day would be so much more interesting if you knew that when you got home, there would be a monkey in your house that you would have to do battle with.

    --
    I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
  103. Re:Don't. Buy insurance. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Helping make sure the thief gets caught has value all on its own. Particularly when it leads to the recovery of property whose value is mostly sentimental.

  104. Try a real alarm system by lalena · · Score: 1
    This may not apply to the OP (since he is in the apartment), but real Security Systems have more benefits beyond the obvious:
    • A security system will get you an insurance discount. More if it is monitored, but still something if it isn't
    • A security system increases the appraised value of your home. I asked our appraiser and he said a good alarm could add $1000 to the home value in our area. The logic here is that monitoring can be found for much cheaper if the company doesn't install the system - under $10/month. Ex: $100 for the basic install + $40/month for 2 years = $1060. No install + $10/month for 2 years = $240.
    • Security systems can also protect against fire, water damage... If you are not home, the response speed of the fire department will be much faster if they smoke alarm contacts the security company.
    • Full featured security systems (panel, box, battery, door/window sensors, motion detectors, multiple LCD keypads...) from ADT or other major manufacturers can be found online for under $500.

    Some may not consider this true DIY, but wiring / installing / programming a fully featured ADT alarm system is not a simple task if you go through the trouble to properly fish all the wires through the walls...
    I've done a couple of these systems in homes I've owned and have posted some of the things I have learned on http://structuredhomewiring.com/

  105. Re:What's that coming over the hill? Is it a monst by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    apparently most burglars agree the one truly effective deterrent that makes them go some place else, is a big dog.

    9 out 10 burglars agree, it has to be dog

  106. Motion by PinkyGigglebrain · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Motion is a great little program available in the Debian repositories and works with any Video4Linux supported device (off the shelf USB web cams and video capture cards).

    I've used it a few times, easy to install and configure.

    It can do time lapse, motion sense and round robin on multiple devices. Even supports a streaming function with Apache and can upload the latest image to a remote FTP server on the Internet.

    Doesn't need much as far as hardware either, one of the systems I set up was a 450MHz celeron with 128M RAM. Over all the hardest part of using it was hiding the camera.

    And best of all, Its free!!

  107. Re:What's that coming over the hill? Is it a monst by GrumblyStuff · · Score: 1

    I don't know about that. Trained ones, sure but from what I've seen on It Takes A Thief, everyday pooches that raise a fuss at strangers coming in won't actually attack.

  108. homesecuritystore by e3m4n · · Score: 1

    when I built my house in 2002 i bought my parts from http://www.homesecuritystore.com./ They even suggested best place for motion detectors, door switches, etc after i sent them a basic floor plan.

  109. Re:And a safe for when you're not there to guard i by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    What the hell is #40 birdshot? fine sand?

    Yep, pretty close. Smaller than BBs. Think "lead pinheads".

    #4 buckshot works well against human sized targets and is the minimum anyone usually recommends for self defense.

    Now that depends on the range, doesn't it?

    If you only intend to fire it when the perp is in the same small room or on a flight of stairs you really don't care HOW small it is. It will penetrate just fine. Doesn't have enough spread at that distance to act as separate particles - there's a column of lead an inch or so deep right behind the particles in the front row.

    Beyond a few feet it's had a chance to open out and once it hits something with significant mass it fans out drastically. But if the first thing it hits besides air is the surface of the perp (and it's still flying in a tight cylindrical formation because the perp is within, say, three steps) it doesn't have a chance to disperse before punching a hole in something important.

    If the perp ISN'T within three steps or so (and doesn't have his own gun pointed at you) you'll have a hard time justifying a self-defense shoot. (And if he is pointing a gun at you from down a long hall he'll have a hard time doing much once he takes the momentum equivalent of a shotgun recoil - without the mass of the shotgun to smooth it out - to a patch maybe the size of his face.)

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  110. Re:What's that coming over the hill? Is it a monst by BLKMGK · · Score: 1

    A friend of mine came home one day and his cat was strutting around with the tail all puffed out. He couldn't figure out WTF was up with the cat until he went upstairs and noticed the window in his spare bedroom was open. When he looked closer he found cat hair, blood, and some skin. It seems someone managed to jimmy his window open and when they stuck their head in the cat went hog wild with the claws! So yeah, cats CAN repel invaders, it just doesn't happen very often :-)

    I agree on getting a dog. I once came home a bit late and surprised my dogs who had been sleeping. The male charged the door growling but I managed to calm him - that is until the girlfriend made a noise by the gate and he charged her. She didn't recognize the growling as a threat and I was too surprised to stop him. She bent down and he leaped at her face and bit her just below the eye. He realized too late what was up but managed not to break the skin at least. He was pretty contrite and she was pretty upset but so far as I'm concerned he proved his worth that night! He was a pretty sweet pup and weighed maybe 50lbs. He was a Shar-Pei which are actually usually pretty kewl dogs but that night surprised by our arrival he sure did try to defend the place!

    Dogs make for good home protection and you had better believe the whole neighborhood knew I had them. Only my closest neighbors knew just how sweet they were - everyone else was terrified :-)

    --
    Build it, Drive it, Improve it! Hybridz.org
  111. Be a Contrarian by evenmoreconfused · · Score: 1

    Leave your door wide open all day. Leave the music on, but at normal listening level. At night, close the door but don't lock it. Have kids, let them play with a sprinkler in the yard. Let the kids get into frequent fights (it doesn't matter whether they are play fights or real fights, they are both intimidating to just about everyone). Get the kids lots of pets, especially odd ones that get lost all through the house. Have the kids' friends over all the time, and tell your friends to drop by too -- aim for 10-15 people for dinner every night.

    Hell, it's worked for us for 15 years and not a single theft in site...

    --
    No. Well...maybe. Actually, yes. It really just depends.
    1. Re:Be a Contrarian by theNAM666 · · Score: 1

      Wait. Wait. Wait-- see below. If your UID was not higher than mine, I'd think we'd shared a house!

  112. That's not what you want by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So.... you say you don't want your stuff stolen, then you say you want to use ZoneMinder? ZoneMinder is a security CAMERA system. It's good for monitoring stores and such to record video of thieves to show the police after they have stolen stuff. It's not so good for preventing theft in your home. In fact, there is a good chance the thieves will steal your ZoneMinder system. Plus, are you really going to mount professional tamper-proof security cameras all over your house? If you live in like, the White House, maybe.

    ZoneMinder also doesn't call the police for you last I checked, and doesn't make big buzzing alarm sounds or anything like that.

    It's far easier just to buy a big lock.

  113. geek security or real security? why not both? by paltemalte · · Score: 1

    If you are doing this because you feel a need to satisfy your geek cravings, then by all means, buy networked video cameras, motion sensors, night vision cameras, set up dedicated servers doing nothing but image-recognition and audio analysis, and you can probably get some kind of solution up that will record and track everything that happens in and around your house or apartment.
    When and if the local meth-head burglar shows up to rob your house he will probably not even notice the fancy security system before he rips the computer running it all out of the wall socket and carries it out to his getaway vehicle.

    If geeky satisfaction is not your goal but rather real security, then follow the advice that many people here have already pointed out:
    1. Get a gun.
    2. Put up signs warning that you have a gun and am familiar with its point and click mode of operation.


    If you want BOTH geeky satisfaction and real security you could hook your face scanning computer up TO your guns, so it automatically shoots everyone it deems villainous. But don't come crying here if your system pops your mom when she comes to do your laundry, if that happens you can only blame your own poor face-scanning-programming skills, not advice you got on the slashdot!

    --
    Sam has one liberty, which he sacrifices for one security. Can you tell me what Sam has now?
  114. Re:And a safe for when you're not there to guard i by confused+one · · Score: 1

    You missed the point... There's no such thing as #40 birdshot. And if I shoot at someone, it's with the intention of killing them. Not maiming them, wounding them, or slowing them down. I will use something that's effective from across the length of my house (40') against a determined man wearing a leather jacket. So, I'll stick with buckshot, thank-you.

  115. just move. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've lived in this house for 16 years now. Started locking the door about 2 years ago, mostly because I had to replace the latch anyway. It's a NICE town, within 1/2 mile of more than one beach. Never a problem.

    If you don't feel safe where you are, seriously consider whether or not it's really worth staying there.

  116. My heart bleeds... by theNAM666 · · Score: 0

    In the middle of San Francisco, we left our doors open. We figured either we or the neighbors would notice and do something.

    But some people need to substitute technology. Whatever.

  117. dogs are better than a dog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We have two dogs, a pitbull and a chow. One night while I was out of town, my girlfriend heard someone walk up to the front door and try the handle. It was locked, but our dogs started barking like crazy (which they always do). She heard them say 'oh shit, they have dogs' and then take off running. get dogs.

  118. Locks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shop around for a long time to find a lock that's hard to pick. This is really rather important -- most locks in the US are very easy to pick.

  119. You need motion detectors and insurance by crovira · · Score: 2, Informative

    The insurance is to recover your loss should anything happen. (Get a general policy which doesn't limit the cause of your loss. [Theft, fire, flood and accident apartment/condo/house insurance is good coverage.])

    Then you want to put up some very visible signs in all the windows saying "Protected by video, motion detectors and patrolled by security guards.

    You might want to buy a bunch of camera mounts (the silvered half-dome kind,) and place them strategically around the perimeter of your dwelling high enough to keep them safe. (12 or so feet off the ground and 12 or so feet from any opening.)

    Whether you get real motion detectors or not is immaterial.

    The impression will be that the house next door is less hazardous to break into than yours.

    Remember, you're insured...

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
  120. Cameras ar by Jorophose · · Score: 1

    A lot of Davinci and OMAP chips from TI now feature ISPs. Assuming it's easy to rig this to normal linux software, you could have it react differently based on what it recognises from the video feed (or from still frames).

    It would be interesting to have something that could place various "targets" at various "levels". For example, for a stranger, the locks remain shut, and if the user is out, the sensors in the house turn up to 11, and the user gets a phone call letting them know someone's at the house (or a MMS/e-mail might be better, with a photo of who's at the door). Or you could configure it to fire tasers out if you feel like goin' back to jail.

    Ideally you'd just have it to recognize when a friendly shows up, so you'd get an alert telling you $friend was at the house.

    But the asker has an apartment, so I guess an ISP is a little harder to use, unless he can set up a camera to check outside his door without having it break easily. These sort of things can be networked to a DVR, be it a hardware solution or a mythbox or something.

    (I guess all that to show that video cameras are not useless, just not thought out enough)

  121. Two Dogs -- by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We have two dogs -- Cherie, a terrier mix weighing in at seven pounds; and Oscar, a 95 pound Rottweiler. Cherie is the alarm system, Oscar is the muscle. Noise and Deterrent. We are the only house on the block that hasn't been broken into since we moved in five years ago. From the foot prints in the snow last winter, some one was nosing around, though; they decided after walking up to two windows on different sides of the house and getting a face full of Oscar staring at them to go some place else.

  122. Re:And a safe for when you're not there to guard i by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    You missed the point... There's no such thing as #40 birdshot.

    Gee. I guess that box of #40 loads I've got in the safe next to the shotgun doesn't really exist.

    Tell 'ya what. I'll go take a look later on. It's been a long time since I bought it. Maybe my memory of the magic number is faulty.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  123. Home burglary is dead by Animats · · Score: 5, Informative

    Home burglary is almost dead. What's to steal? Any TV that can be easily carried has zilch resale value. Anything with a CRT has negative value; you have to pay the recycling center to take it. Used computers have little value. Nobody keeps much cash around any more. Cell phones are usually in someone's pocket. Who has real silverware today? Used kitchen appliances are nearly worthless. Same for used clothing. Used furniture? No market there.

    In the current recession, pawnshops are currently choked with stuff they can't sell, so unloading stolen property is tough.

    I just looked at the crime map for my area, which is an urban area of about 100,000 people, ranging from very poor to very rich. About ten burglaries in the last month, and only one was a residence. The rest were break-ins into vehicles. There were more attempted burglaries with arrests than successful ones.

    1. Re:Home burglary is dead by Macrat · · Score: 1

      Home burglary is almost dead. What's to steal?

      Police impersonators invade Pleasant Hill apartment

      "The intruders then rummaged through the apartment, took electronics and ran away to a vehicle driven by a third person."

    2. Re:Home burglary is dead by RMH101 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      In the UK, the increase in car security has meant that a fair proportion of breakins are to get your car keys, and then steal your car. Any other opportunistic theft is a bonus to them. I know a couple of people who've woken up to find someone in the house looking for keys, and had a breakin myself last year where someoen went for the handbag my girlfriend had left in sight of the window (I know) assuming there'd be keys in there..

    3. Re:Home burglary is dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You leave your car keys at home? Lol. I guess if you have 2 cars... but then how hard is it to keep car keys in a place that's not obvious to an intruder?

    4. Re:Home burglary is dead by RMH101 · · Score: 1

      Most people keep their car keys in the house when they're asleep. Mine are generally in the pocket of my jeans, for example. Breaking and entering and stealing keys (whether stealthily or, as is becoming more common, by threatening the homeowner) is pretty common now. Thieves drive around neighbourhood, look for tasty looking car and come back at night...

    5. Re:Home burglary is dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's to steal?

      The dickweeds who broke into my apartment while I was out of state took cameras, jewelry, a laptop, and a carton of cigarettes. Then they took the couch cushions off, arranged them around the coffee table and left a bunch of lit candles burning.

      When they left, they left the door open and my elderly cat got out and lost. The candles would have burned the place down if the catsitter hadn't come that night and seen the situation.

      There were more attempted burglaries with arrests than successful ones.

      I don't think an attempted burglary has resulted in an arrest in Oakland, ever. When I called the cops, they didn't show up until SIXTEEN HOURS LATER -- only 8 hours after they said they would.

    6. Re:Home burglary is dead by jpcarter · · Score: 1

      Home burglary is almost dead. What's to steal?

      Police impersonators invade Pleasant Hill apartment

      "The intruders then rummaged through the apartment, took electronics and ran away to a vehicle driven by a third person."

      "Investigators now believe that the robbers were familiar with the apartment and at least one of its occupants, and were looking for drugs, said Sgt. Scott Vermillion."

      Same article.

    7. Re:Home burglary is dead by Animats · · Score: 1

      And "The getaway vehicle was described as a brown or champagne-colored late-model SUV resembling a Chevrolet, with a license plate resembling 4TEZ960 OR 4TEZ690." Either they used their own car, in which case we'll read about the arrest in the next few days, or they stole a car far more valuable than anything in the apartment.

    8. Re:Home burglary is dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suppose you don't do any woodworking. There is a healthy market for used tools, and they are all to easily grabbed from an unattended garage with the door left up.

  124. Start with some decent locks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I recommend the Medeco ones or the better models from Schlage. And lock your doors, including that one between the garage and your house. Trim back the bushes that give potential criminal privacy as they are breaking in to your house.. Make yourself an unattractive target first.

    As for security systems, the hardware and the system itself isn't that big a deal, it's a one time capital expense for the most part. The really expensive part is monitoring it. If you really feel like you need it, talk to your home owners insurance provider and find out what the recommend, they have discounts with some monitoring services and they can cut your insurance rate too. ADT is on the order of $20 a month for the cheapest and maybe $35 for a decent level of service with the USAA discount and then USAA drops your premium a bit (it was $22 for us with the savings from the rate cut and discount. Close to $40 is paid out though) They'll almost give you the system if you sign up for 24 or 36 months and they'll include smoke detector monitoring as well... You can build something as fancy as you can imagine with them, if it's not enough talk to Brinks.

    The cost of DIY security is that if security really and truly matters to you, DIY monitoring doesn't cut it. It's pretty easy and cheap to make a linux DVR but window monitors, motion sensors, and door monitors that are all integrated is a more difficult challenge. Schlage now offers some sort of computer web-based home monitoring stuff too, it might be worth a look. Think about a better neighborhood and get to know your neighbors.

  125. Simple system. by eXFeLoN · · Score: 0

    I nice fun dog. It doesn't have to be an attack dog. It helps if it is a smart dog. Or a dog that you're very afraid of, those aren't as much fun, but very effective. Replace all your crappy door locks with real professional grade door locks. Upgrade your door jams so they can't be kicked in thus negating the effectiveness of your awesome new locks. Some alarm system stickers for your windows. A couple fake video cameras. You've spent maybe a few hundred dollars, and prevented 99% of all criminals from invading your home, and you have a new friend (the dog), or possibly a terrifying dog that you can use to intimidate Jehovah's witnesses.

    --
    My other sig is a knife wound.
  126. Re:And a safe for when you're not there to guard i by jimmydigital · · Score: 1

    What the hell is #40 birdshot? fine sand? There's a #4 birdshot and #4 buckshot. #4 buckshot works well against human sized targets and is the minimum anyone usually recommends for self defense.

    I read a self defense ballistics study a few years ago (that I can't find a link for) and it was suggesting #1 buck as a defensive load. You get like 16 .30 cal pellets in a 2 3/4 shell which amounts to a pretty good size hole in whatever you hit with it without excessive penetration.

     

    --
    Every normal man must be tempted, at times, to spit on his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats. -HLM
  127. Net cams by soundguy · · Score: 1

    For $75, you can get a pan & tilt cam off of eBay with a built-in web/ftp server, WiFi, and 2-way audio. Put them anywhere that has 110vac or 5vdc available, set them up to access your router, and have them message or email your cell phone when the motion detector is triggered. Most smart phone platforms have apps that let you connect directly to your cams or you can use a web browser. If someone is in your house that isn't supposed to be there, you can yell at them thru the camera "There's a gun pointed at your head, motherfucker. Get out or die!"

    --
    Nothing worthwhile ever happens before noon
  128. Layers... by cptdondo · · Score: 2, Informative

    1. Plant Japanese Bitter Orange under and in front of all your windows. Try to get the flying dragon cultivar. (No, I'm not kidding. Google it.)

    2. Get a motion sensor and a recording of a dog barking. Put speaker in metal garbage can on your roof. Your neighbors will hate you but no one will come near your house.

    3. Get good insurance. You will find that the discount for burglar alarms is minimal.

    4. Stay away from monitored alarms. Most are crooked.

    1. Re:Layers... by weicco · · Score: 1

      2. Get a motion sensor and a recording of a dog barking.

      I went even further! I have two dogs, a German shepherd and a Leonberger. German shepher weights about 40 kilos and isn't afraid of anything or anyone. Leonberger weights some 60 kilos and can crack cow's femur in half with a single bite! They keep anyone out of the apartment when I'm not home. And when I'm home... Well, I have Baikal IJ-27 and a good aim ;)

      Just kidding. I have all of those but they aren't really for protection. But it would be really funny to see someone breaking in to the apartment :)

      --
      You don't know what you don't know.
    2. Re:Layers... by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      Yes, piss off your neighbors. The ones who would otherwise call the cops if there was something odd going on at your house. Good idea.

  129. Dog Substitute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After I bought my house, one of the first things I acquired was a big doghouse. I didn't own a dog but I always thought that the psychological deterrent to a potential thief that there would be a big unfriendly dog on the property was worth the cost.
      Of course after a year or so of looking at the empty and lonely doghouse I finally went out and got a dog. Great pet and priceless security. I've since found that the best accessory to go with the theft deterrent of a big doghouse is big piles of dog poop in the yard. What self-respecting thief would want to walk through that?

  130. Re:And a safe for when you're not there to guard i by toastar · · Score: 1

    I can't be the only one that envisioned automatic "gun cameras" here can I?

    Deadly-force mantraps are illegal essentially everywhere.

    Rule of thumb: In most jurisdictions you can only use deadly force to defend yourself (or another person of certain related classes) against a threat to life or limb. In some you can also use it to defend property under some circumstances.

    You can't delegate the decisions to machines - especially when you personally aren't there to be at risk. (It's not just their operation that's illegal. Even setting up such a device is one or more of several crimes.)

    Scenario: You're away (or died last month). Sheriff, firefighter, landlord, or heir shows shows up (with a warrant, probable cause, chasing smoke or flame, or coming to take possession of his property). "Sherrif, warrant!" / "Anybody in there? You're on fire!" / "Home at last! Let's get this door open and move in." Bash. BANG!

    IDK Here in texas we have pretty liberal Self defense laws, You can even shoot someone running away with your stuff, A fully automatic Mantrap might not work, But one controlled by iphone would probably be legal. Granted I doubt this would be legal in most other states.

  131. Re:And a safe for when you're not there to guard i by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

    This load will not stop a bad guy, shoot it into some ballistic gel and see what happens.

  132. Monitored Security Systems are Crap by SolarStorm · · Score: 4, Informative

    When we signed up for $240/yr monitoring, I left specific instructions. "If the alarm goes off, call the police directly, not us or any contact. I will pay any false alarm fine. I live 2 min from the police station, so there is a chance of actually catching someone. Is this OK?" The answer was "You are the customer"

    So, we went on holidays, game my mom the code, and a passcode if she tripped the alarm. Warned her that if she did expect the boys in blue. She is 81, was nervous and sure enough she tripped the alarm. So instead of cops, the security company called the house. My mom was flustered, couldnt answer the security question, but the monitoring agency figured she was too old to be a crook and told her how to reset the alarm. They couldn't understand why I was furious and canceled, after all they saved my mom an embarrassment.

    so now, I purchased a couple of IP cameras that motion sense and an email to my gmail with a picture. As long as I have my phone, I see who is entering within a few minutes or less (typically 20s). Also makes it very hard for your kids to lie about what time they came home. The 4 cameras cost me $80 each on ebay, and I connected them to my wireless network. I can also at anytime now log into a web page and monitor the surroundings. So even in bed, I grab my iPhone, and have a look outside if I hear a noise.

    We also did the 2 big black dogs. They are now part of the family and a great deterrent.

    1. Re:Monitored Security Systems are Crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is quite OT, but...

      Also makes it very hard for your kids to lie about what time they came home.

      Depending on what kind of parent you are, that may not be such a good thing. My parents' overprotectiveness nearly killed my social skills, and it would have been much worse if they had that kind of monitoring capabilities.

    2. Re:Monitored Security Systems are Crap by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      So, we went on holidays, game my mom the code, and a passcode if she tripped the alarm. Warned her that if she did expect the boys in blue. She is 81, was nervous and sure enough she tripped the alarm.

      You are one evil bastard.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    3. Re:Monitored Security Systems are Crap by BlackHorse · · Score: 1

      What are the models on those cameras? It sounds like a cool setup.

    4. Re:Monitored Security Systems are Crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I live 2 min from the police station, so there is a chance of actually catching someone."

      I doubt that any responding officers would be coming from the station.

    5. Re:Monitored Security Systems are Crap by SolarStorm · · Score: 1

      They are cheap and generic, called, "IP Camera". Do a search on ebay, there is a guy in Hong Kong selling them I think. They link to each other so they can all be viewed from the same webpage. I wanted something cheap enough that if they got stolen I wouldn't be freaked out. They are easy enough to steal by breaking the mount. I drilled out the screws, but the mount is still breakable. I like the gmailed picture because even if the thieves rip off the computer, I still have photos. Not fool proof by any stretch, but makes my place look less attractive than the other places on the block. The only real protection from a determined thief is insurance with documentation.

  133. get a DOG as well! by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 2, Informative

    get a DOG as well!

    if you don't want a dog they have fake dog sound boxes.

    1. Re:get a DOG as well! by Abstrackt · · Score: 1

      That reminds me of a funny story I heard once. A guy had a dog that always jumped on the couch so he rigged up a motion detector and a speaker that shouted "get off the couch!!!" in his voice every time the dog jumped on it. In the middle of the night a few weeks later, he heard his voice coming from downstairs followed by a loud crash, turns out someone had broken into his house and been so startled by the yelling they tripped and fell.

      --
      They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett
  134. Re:What's that coming over the hill? Is it a monst by tsstahl · · Score: 1

    Dammit! There ain't no bear pound near my house!

  135. Re:And a safe for when you're not there to guard i by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You don't want to hurt the bad guy you want to stop him.

    Um... no... I think I want him DEAD.

  136. RE: Dog (false positives) by neBelcnU · · Score: 2, Informative

    A dog is not the best option, the false-positive rate can be high. This rate is very difficult to predict at the time of acquisition, and can involve subtle environmental cues (EG: dappled sunlight) or combined-effects (EG: Mr. Squeaky sliding under the couch). The end result is getting the alarms confused for "Major Alien Invasion" and "Agent With Flat Tire." (Get Smart)

    If an electronic alarm had this tendency, it would be thrown out the window. Doing so with the dog is ill-advised.

  137. Crime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is horribly obvious most people in this thread do not live in high crime areas. Most of the suggestions you are making are meaningless.

    Gun: A gun does not work if you are not home. In fact, it gives them something nice to steal. Leave it loaded on your bed table for extra points.

    Insurance: Sure, works great the first time. Pay out your deposit, hope you get enough money to buy all they stole back and then enjoy the increased insurance premiums. Wait till you get burglarized a few more times, insurance companies LOVE high risk clients.

    In my experience most burglaries of regular homes are not the stuff you see on TV. It is crack addicts and people with nothing to lose essentially smashing in your door, stealing as much as they can and running out.

    An alarm is actually a GREAT security too. Without it the burglar can simply stay in your house as long as they want. Believe me, I know, personally. It is worth the "$1 a day" for monitoring. Don't bother with the stickers, they are going to try to break in anyway. When the alarm doesn't go off (key point: stickers don't make noise) they are going to wise up pretty quick.

  138. My 2 cents by BahamutSalad · · Score: 3, Informative

    Full disclosure: I've been an alarm monitoring operator for 5 or so years now. I don't live in the US, I don't work for a company that operates in the US, so I have no way to financially benefit from helping the majority of /. users. The stuff I mention here I know well, but one thing I haven't a clue about is the home automation side of things.

    Deterrants:

    Large work boots, leaving lights on and such are helpful deterrants. Security stickers help, but no so much as most houses have them. A good idea that I didn't see mentioned in the comments, if you're not keen on getting an alarm is to get just the external siren of the alarm and stick that on the outside of the house. Don't get one of the metal ones, get one of the polycarbonate / plastic ones instead. No reputable companies have used the metal ones for years now, and a lot of burglars seem to know this. Again things like fences & dogs are also excellent deterrants. Although fences can act as cover so a burglar can muck around all they like trying to get a window open, without being noticed by neighbours.

    Alarms:

    I've encountered heaps of attempted break ins throughout my career. The vast majority of burglars will freak out and run once they hear a very loud siren screaming at them. Most of them get so scared by it that they drop everything in the process. If I had to put a number on it, I'd say this is what happens about 90% of the time. Even though it's far from a guarentee that you'll stop them in their tracks, it does make an excellent deterrent. I'd avoid the off the shelf junk you get from electronics stores and the likes, as they're usually total garbage. They're always either unstable, don't live long enough to be worth it, don't detect when someone does get into the house, or they drive the neighbours nuts false activating. You can buy a good, high quality unit from fleabay if you're feeling adventurous. I don't know how big your house is, but if you don't think you'll require more then 7 sensors now or in the future, the Bosch Solution 880 is a good buy and I see them frequently on eBay for cheap in a kit. You'll require some basic knowledge of electronics like being able to read some basic "this is how you wire this" diagrams in the install manual, and some basic DIY skills. It's a fairly easy system to install though, some of them are very hard for those who haven't got experience specifically with alarms. If you want something bigger / different set of requirements then email me (via bahamut.kicks-ass.org/contact/ - sorry but work know my email and I'd rather they didn't find this via google) and I'll let you know of something suitable.

    I would avoid wireless sensors & remotes. Remotes not so much, but sensors definately. Interferance from aircraft, scaffolds, trees that cause RF interference whenever it rains, crappy light switches, aircraft, and a bunch of other obscenely weird stuff can all cause problems. It's not that common, but it does happen.

    If you do buy a kit make sure it includes the panel (pcb, transformer & the case), battery, a couple of wired sensors, a keypad, a peizo / internal siren & a plastic / polycarbonate external siren (the one with the light) & CABLE! A lot of traders won't mention anything about the lack of cable in the ad, leaving you kind of screwed. Another thing I see them do is say "we'll install it for you if it's too hard" - be careful of that, they'll often way overcharge on labour to make up for the rock bottom cost of the hardware. I've seen them dump the install manuals that come with the alarm, and replace it with their own much crappier version so that it's more likely that they come crying for help. Most alarm manuals you can get online fairly easily though. Stay away from used alarms on ebay, they're almost always FUBAR'ed.

    Alarm Monitoring:

    This can be somewhat of a waste of time and money. Monitoring is often cheap, and the price is really reflected in the quality of their service. Most modern alarms can be hooked up to a l

  139. Put camera/ dvr on neighbour's residence, watching by gregzeng · · Score: 1

    Being friendly with neighbors - each of you have access to each other;s property, to place a cam/ webcam/ dvr on their residence to watch yours. They can do the same. The electricity consumption is minimal, but they have battery backup anyway. Access to the unit is only needed to: 1) check that it works 2) replace the batteries every 2 years 3) if the worst happens (fire, theft, vandalism, etc) - then the DIGITAL VIDEO RECORDER(S) have trapped it all. Eight neighbours = 8 setups. If in hotel room type of setup, wireless camera to a DVR is ok. Some camera are very small - a cross-head screw, plastic cigarette lighter, fountain pen. They can be motion and / or sound triggered. Ebay has many : "spy camera". Greg Zeng, Australian Capital Territory.

    --
    Australian Capital Territory
  140. Re:And a safe for when you're not there to guard i by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IDK Here in texas we have pretty liberal Self defense laws, You can even shoot someone running away with your stuff, A fully automatic Mantrap might not work, But one controlled by iphone would probably be legal.

    Even in Texas, such a contraption is not legal. Self defense requires that you be there; deadly force simply to protect property is not legal.

  141. Build it easy to use - Ground panel well by StatureOfLiberty · · Score: 1

    If you do build one, make sure you put a lot of thought into making it realiable, easy to maintain and easy to use. I worked as an installer (years ago - I know technology has changed). But our company went to great lengths to make our systems great systems. We found that most home alarm systems rarely get used with people at home and moving about because it is almost impossible to do so. With our alarms, you could arm the system and disable individual sensors. So you could grill on the back porch and be able to go in and out of the back door while the rest of the doors were monitored. We put multiple magnets on window frames. You could have a window cracked open. If someone opened it further, the alarm would go off. If you wanted to have one window open, you could bypass it completely.

    Make sure you document the installation. If you are running wiring, label wires so you can determine which wires go where. Bring them to a central point so you can test all of your loops from one place. We used to run ours to a point in the attic and run a multiconductor cable from there down to the panel. Of course, if you do that, you will have to trace problems in less than ideal temperatures.

    Buy good equipment. Even hundreds of dollars saved will mean nothing if the system you end up with is unusable. Things like motion sensors used to be very tempermental. They had to be good quality. They had to be placed carefully. For example: A motion sensor pointed at or near a window might go off when the drapes move because they are over an air conditioning vent.

    Research monitoring services before you install the system. Understand any fees or requirements up front so you wont be surprised.

    Be aware that in some cities false alarms can result in fines levied against you to recoup the cost of sending the police to your home.

    Be aware that in many areas, low voltage wiring (alarms, multimedia, sound systems ...) fall under code. In the past, if you were building a home and wanted to install cable runs, alarm wiring and speaker wires you could do it. Now, they have to pass inspection just like the primary electrical wiring does.

    VERY IMPORTANT
    Make sure you ground the panel well. We had the lowest falsing rate in our city and the main reason why was our panels were properly grounded (to the same point where the main electrical service ground wire goes if at all possible.)

    ALSO
    A poorly implemented alarm system can be worse than none. For example, If your neighbor's alarm system falses and goes off all of the time and all the sudden it stops, it probably means they turned the system off. Before the falses, you wouldn't have known if they had a system. Now you know they do, and you know it is off.

    Finally, There is a reason that alarm companies have to be licensed and bonded in most areas. Putting in a good, usable system is not something just anyone can do. But, with research, planning and careful installation you can have a much better system than most commercially installed residential systems.

  142. Re:What's that coming over the hill? Is it a monst by deniable · · Score: 1

    I hear they're not so great in winter. House training involves multiple trips to the woods.

  143. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The House is on a third of an acre. It was zoned agricultural. I have an Emden Gander that I raised from a gosling and two companions. The wings (5")
    are their main weapon. They are really loud if someone they don't know comes. They give early warning, if a stranger is walking close to the fence.
    They can't be bribed.
    At my old place I had 500 lb pure black boar with razor sharp tusks that slept by the gate at night.
    If my organic security system doesn't stop them, I my Mauser with two 5 round striper clips in the sling and a Schmidt-Rubin with 5 round mag loaded
    and ready.I don't keep the guns loaded, but can have them loaded in seconds. If I am not home my wife likes the Mauser.

                                                                                Richard

  144. Re:What's that coming over the hill? Is it a monst by value_added · · Score: 1

    A bear is much better than even several dogs.

    Really?

    These dogs are used for hunting bears in the Caucasus. In Chechnya, for example, bear hunting is considered a local sport. That other local sport is scaring the hell out of Russian troops trying to invade.

  145. Re:And a safe for when you're not there to guard i by sinai · · Score: 1

    Taking this quick ammo assessment into account, one should also consider another implication: the likelihood of the round to penetrate the body, a wall, or other structure and harm people/property. So potentially, the living environment (small apartment? rural ranch?) will be a prominent concern. Wouldn't want the neighbor Norm gettin' tagged by a stray sabot, would we?

  146. The last time I did any research on this: by Steauengeglase · · Score: 1

    OK, where to start. As everyone has said, a dog is generally the best place. Dogs are nice, friendly, intimidating and they have ears that are much better than yours. If nothing else they are excellent door bells.

    The next place is getting something like a floor safe. I can't speak for most people in most areas, but when someone broke into my home some years back they didn't do it while I was sitting at the dinner table, rather they did it while I was a work. On that note, no safe cracker is going to break into your home and most thieves aren't going to waste the time and effort of ripping it out when it is hammered into concrete. Now the real trick here is obvious, remember to put your valuables IN the safe, don't wait. Why a floor safe? Because it isn't easy to notice and you aren't going to accidentally leave one open.

    I'm leery of guns, not because I'm against gun ownership, but the last person I knew who went that route ended with a broken jaw from being repeatedly pistol whipped. Granted that guy wasn't too bright, but in a bad situation do you know if you will keep your cool or lose you head? If you think so a 12 gauge Mossberg is always cheap and reliable. Also gun stores who buy old police issue weapons tend to sell them cheap. Granted I accept no responsibility for anything in this post, this is your life and your responsibility.

    Next up security cameras. I picked mine up when my workplace was upgraded theirs, so it only cost me siamese coax and a few bolts. I can't say I'm a big fan of wireless cameras. Granted anyone who is going to bother circumventing it will probably just steal cars from a parking lot, your crap isn't that important. Honestly, they just creep me out a little. Seems like something my friends would use to screw with me.

    If you ever have to turn something over to the police you should be mindful of two things. Is "taping" the interior or exterior of your home in any way illegal (will you be brought up on wiretapping charges and become yet another 'is Big Brother out to get us' Slashdot post?). Ask a lawyer. The next is the chain of custody. If you are backing up or directly saving your video off-site, it may require a subpoena just to make it admissible as evidence. Paperwork is a bitch and your story is nothing new to the police, so you may want to consider saving it locally. So the obvious paranoid crazy person question is "What if they steal my computer?". Well, they won't. The guy who breaks into your home probably didn't spend his formative years reading Tom's Hardware; computers are cheap and bulky, not something you want to steal like money or jewelry or prescription medication. If this is something that still bugs you, conduit boxes are cheap and most mini-ATX boards will easily fit into one with the aid of a Dremmel tool. It is the one place where the appearance of wires doesn't seem out of place. Granted if they were crackheads looking for scrap copper, well, you lost that bet anyway and should have gotten a dog.

    Honestly, just go with Wolfling1's Risk Management, more wisdom there than you will find here.

    1. Re:The last time I did any research on this: by joe_frisch · · Score: 1

      Much simpler. You need to use a credit card (not cash) to purchase:

      several bottles of peroxide hair bleach
      1 RC aircraft control box
      several 12" lengths of 1" threaded pipe with end caps.
      several electric cigarette lighters
      A one-way ticket on a domestic flight - which you then cancel. (you can do this a couple of times)
      1 religious text from your favorite extremist group.

      The police and FBI will provide free 24 hour / day surveillance for you

  147. Re:And a safe for when you're not there to guard i by toastar · · Score: 2, Informative

    you've never been to texas I take it.

    "A person is justified in using deadly force against another to protect his property to the degree he reasonably believes the force is immediately necessary to prevent the other's imminent commission of arson, burglary, robbery, theft during the nighttime or criminal mischief during the nighttime, and he reasonably believes that the property cannot be protected by any other means."

      "A person is justified in using deadly force against another to pervent the other who is fleeing after committing burglary, robbery, or theft during the nighttime, from escaping with the property and he reasonable believes that the property cannot be recovered by any other means; or, the use of force other than deadly force to protect or recover the property would expose him or another to a substantial risk of death or serious bodily injury. (Nighttime is defined as the period 30 minutes after sunset until 30 minutes before sunrise.)"

  148. Alarming questions by sgarrigan · · Score: 2, Informative

    A helpful response needs more info from poster. Are you in an apartment with just one vulnerable door? If so, a GOOD lock may be a wise approach (Google lockpicking to see all the common locks that can be picked in a minute). The best alarm systems are often the simplest (I used to install alarms). Visit a Radio Shack for ideas. Surveillance systems can give you evidence, but they don't prevent break ins, and they only deter them if you announce the surveillance. The biggest variables involve the specifics of your place: vulnerable windows/doors, well-lit, highly-public exterior or dark doorways and windows behind bushes. Bottom line: if a burglar sees that you've chosen a smart lock, and if he is pretty sure there's any kind of alarm, he'll usually try someplace easier.

    1. Re:Alarming questions by fridaynightsmoke · · Score: 1

      Absolutely. Alarms, CCTV or guns are about stopping or catching a thief who is already in you house. Strong doors & windows with GOOD locks keep the thief out in the first place.

      I have a solid wooden door with an EVVA 3KSPlus (http://www.evva.com/products/mechanical-locking-systems/schliesssystem-3ks-3ksplus/technology/en/) as the main lock. Reputedly unpickable, undrillable etc etc. Cost me £90 ($143 US, prices in your country of choice may vary) for the cylinder, but it's rock solid and will keep even the best equipped neer-do-wells out. On the minus side if I ever get myself locked out a lumberjack will be more use than a locksmith.

      --
      This is a substitute for a clever sig that fits within the maximum number of characters.
  149. Sure... by RichiH · · Score: 1

    I think your key ingredient might be time travel, not explosives.

    1. Re:Sure... by jamesh · · Score: 4, Funny

      time travel

      time travel? Now that's going to require a lot of explosives!

    2. Re:Sure... by GooberToo · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think your key ingredient might be time travel

      Customer: I gotta get these pills to my girlfriend.. four months ago.

      Einstein Express. When it absolutely, positively, has to be there the day before yesterday.

    3. Re:Sure... by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      No, only a little thiotimoline.

  150. Please... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apply the patchset to a recent pull and stick it on Gitorious. Call it "Zoneminder Redux". And thanks for putting in the effort.

  151. Re:What's that coming over the hill? Is it a monst by RichiH · · Score: 1

    Why are you _insightful_?

    In any case, I counter your bear with laser-sharks. You even got to build a moat!

  152. Re:What's that coming over the hill? Is it a monst by Vastad · · Score: 1

    But have you seen how much a bear poops in a single no. 2 session? You wouldn't inconvenience the morning joggers, you'd block the sidewalk!>/p>

    What about winter? Hibernation? Unless you went for one of the tropical bears, like a Sun Bear....but I hear they aren't too aggressive. And the whole endangered species list and animal trades acts might be a little bit of a hassle.

  153. Back to the real world... by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

    I doubt if electronic security systems are very effective. The only places in my street that ever get broken into are the places that have security systems.

    You're probably better off taking steps to make sure your place is harder to break into easily. This is bearing in mind that most burglaries are opportunistic: so anything that makes the job take a long time, make a lot of noise or leave the burglar exposed and conspicuous in the course of his gainful employment will be effective at keeping your stuff safe.

    Doors don't have to be steel-reinforced, but if made of solid timber will be hard to break. Similarly, there are types of glass available that can stand up to hammer attacks for some time. And use good locks. Those 5-pin tumbler (Yale or similar) locks are useless. Anyone can bump those in less than 5 seconds.

    Bear in mind that you can't really defend against a sustained attack or a real professional without making your place look like Fort Knox (i.e. a big fat target saying "Burgle Me"). Living in a house with a scruffy front yard and junk on your porch sometimes helps - it looks like you won't have anything worth nicking.

  154. Forgot to mention by PinkyGigglebrain · · Score: 1

    it can also send emails or SMS messages and execute a script/command when it detects motion.

    A little parallel/serial port programing and you could have it activate an alarm, call the police, energize the grid under the carpet with 50,000 volts, etc..

  155. Re:What's that coming over the hill? Is it a monst by RichiH · · Score: 1

    > Dogs are useful and all, but bear in mind that your neighbours won't be very happy if the damn things bark all night, or whenever a pedestrian walks past your house.

    Large dogs don't need to compensate as much as small dogs. Thus, they bark less. Same as with humans, really. Also, they were talking about a properly trained dog, not a spoiled brat.

    > They will also be unimpressed if when you take the brutes for walkies you let them shit all over the sidewalk, nature strips, and their front lawns.

    Or if you crapped on the sidewalk yourself. Or hit them in the face with a shovel. Don't be an ass and clean up after yourself.

    > This is true, but it's also true that if I saw a burglar breaking into the house of the redneck with the big noisy dogs that bark the whole damn night and shit where I walk, I probably wouldn't report that burglar.

    At least in Germany, that is a crime in and as of itself. Hope that no one gets hurt during the burglary or you are in deep trouble.

    > That nosy neighbour who stays at home all day can be your greatest security asset if you're on good terms.

    And be annoying as all three hells the rest of your life. Yay.

    I don't even like dogs, but I don't think I want you as my neighbour, either.

  156. Re:What's that coming over the hill? Is it a monst by PitaBred · · Score: 1

    And that's why you train your animals properly. It's not hard, it just takes some work. You can't just buy a dog and expect it to just happen, any more than you have a child and expect them to be fine without any guidance.

  157. ...mixed with snake-oil by RichiH · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So, I read the FAQ.

    It's atomized pepper. Does that mean they actually break down the molecules? Apparently so as without cleaning up (it's optional!) there is no harm for humans, cats and dogs after three to four hours. Your toddler and pets will appreciate this fact as they are a lot closer to the ground when that stuff is stirred up again and again.

    Also, even though it is a fine-grained powder based on pepper, it's not flammable.

    That, or the FAQ is a steaming pile of lies and half-truths.

  158. neighbors... by big_paul76 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's funny you mention that - my wife and I just moved into a neighborhood that is cheap, but slightly dodgy. Not so much dangerous, but a lot of break-ins and property crime.

    When we were checking out our place, I was looking at the parking lot included. I looked across the alley and realized that I was looking at a 3-story building, maybe ten or twelve apartment balconies per floor, that was a retirement home.

    At any hour of the day or night, there are at least one or two people on their balconies having a smoke. All of a sudden, I stopped worrying about break-ins.

    --
    The plural form of "anecdote" is "anecdotes", not "evidence".
    1. Re:neighbors... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except during jeopardy..

    2. Re:neighbors... by pbhj · · Score: 1

      If the burglar wears a high-vis vest or some technicians coveralls and carries a clipboard or handheld computer then they won't be stopped. If you're in an area with a lot of vigilance then they may need to wear a "locksmith" high-vis or drive a second-hand utility company vehicle.

  159. Re:What's that coming over the hill? Is it a monst by cgenman · · Score: 1

    Other great deterrents:

    * Location Location Location. Police publish city theft statistics. Look them up before moving anywhere. And the higher-traffic your specific location, the less likely it will get broken into. Those sleepy quiet corners are perfect places to steal from.
    * Be on the 2nd floor or above. I've had friends get things stolen from due to a 3rd floor bathroom window being open, but it's far less likely than first - floor break ins.
    * House Construction. I've had people steal because the back door was so old they could pry off a few nails and step through. You can remove putty from windows and take those out of the frame. Older locks are trivial to pick, but all locks are reasonably easy to get through. An old-fashioned deadbolt that is always used can be helpful. Of course, another had her TV stolen because they battering rammed a hole into a perfectly good wall. It happens.
    * Be obvious. A camera that the criminal can't see doesn't make them think twice. Motion-sensing lights are always a good choice, but people have gotten used to them. Put up some wifi web cams in highly visible interior locations. Be unexpected, be visible about your protections, make the criminal feel like they don't know what is going on.
    * Don't give juicy targets. Keep the TV far enough away from the window that people can't see it. Use privacy or cafe curtains during the day. Buy cars that are less frequently stolen. Use cable instead of satellite TV.
    * Get renter's insurance. Theft happens: you can deter it, but you can't prevent it. Your stuff is just that: stuff. It can go away at any moment. Renter's insurance will let you get the financial value back if that happens. Or the building burns down, the water causes the ceiling to collapse, etc.

    In the grand scheme of things, people won't break into your home simply because they don't want to. Locks are easy to pick, 90% of home security systems are defeated by disabling power, etc. You can always get mugged in the street in the morning. It isn't some grandiose robbery plan to thwart your employer and take over the world. It's probably just some random 30 year olds short of cash walking down the street who noticed you had Xbox and iPhone boxes in your trash. There isn't a lot you can really do about it. All you can do is choose your location carefully, and make yourself a less attractive target than your neighbors.

  160. A moat alone isn't going to do anything. by Ihlosi · · Score: 1
    A moat of course. A water barrier is quite effective keeping out the vandals and goths, not to mention pesky viking raiders.

    No, the moat alone won't help. You also need castle walls to go along with it, a drawbridge and a gate to actually get into your house^h^h^h^h^hcastle, and of course a selection of anti-siege equipment (burning pitch, catapults, etc).

  161. Re:And a safe for when you're not there to guard i by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What do you have that you have to spend your whole life sitting next to and guarding?

    Right now? A 2 1/2 year old daughter.

  162. SecuritySpy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ben Software's Security Spy is great! (If you've a Mac lying around.)

    We use the 16 camera version on a G5 2.3x2 Xserve frame running 10.5.8... 4 analog cameras, and several IP cameras.

    Internet access, motion or sound based triggering, easy setup... supports tons of cameras.

    Some cameras have an alarm that can be triggered by open or closing a circuit, but this idea doesn't generally solve your intrusion detection. Just records it for you.

    We've had a few instances where 'going to the tape' was called for... but, much of the recording we have of such are not very helpful. Too blurry at night to get a good plate # off the car... person was hooded, obscuring their identity. And so on.

  163. Insurance Policy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not sure if it has been said. Homeowners/renters insurance is your best bet. Have them do an inventory/documentation of your belongs and get a policy. They are not that expensive and most likely cheaper than any DIY security system.

  164. Start with your doors and windows by datadefender · · Score: 2, Informative

    We had a burglary recently and asked police to help us to secure our home. They pointed out that unless it is a targeted, intruders seek the easy way to get into your home.
    Police statistics show that if a burglar cannot get in within 3 minutes, he will give up.
    The statistics also show that the main entry points for burglar are main door, patio door and groundfloor windows. In a standard gouse, all it takes is a beefy screwdriver to crack the hinges.
    So the first thing you should do is add additional security hinges to doors and windows on the ground floor. In Germany these are available from www.abus.de. We installed FAS101 and FTS3003 - They are abot 35€ a piece. I am sure you will find similar products in other countries. They will withstand 1 ton pressure and are easy to mount and operate. For a total of 500€ we have now a security where it will take more than 3 mins to break in. Should be good enough to preotect from the occasional intruder. If somebody really wants to get in, they will. It is just a matter of time and tools.

  165. Moving... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...to a civilized country where one needs only a small lock on a door. Somewhere north from the US or so.

  166. Have the cake and... by romania · · Score: 0

    I believe that you can call that a good example of have the cake and eat it too. Either don't buy tempting stuff or risk them being stolen. Our guy has invented the "have the cake, eat it, but also keep as much as possible from the ingredients" by trying to be "safe, on a budget". This seems to be the rule of the modern western society - I'm a hippie and into giving stuff as long as I own nothing, yet once I start to accumulate I'm for the ownership rights and lower taxes.

    --
    http://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
  167. Home security primer by hcdejong · · Score: 1

    Everything you need to know is right here

  168. 5. Get to know your neighbours by fantomas · · Score: 2

    You forgot 5. Get to know your neighbours.

    I am surprised at the number of posts here which don't mention other people, seeing as slashdot gets excited about social engineering hacker contests, but to manage your risk and look after your property, don't forget to cultivate good relationships with your neighbours. Social side of things can help secure your property as much as technology.

    Having friends looking out for you reduces risk immensely. I've got a neighbour who's phoned me at work to tell me I left a back window open: her boyfriend had noticed - and she'd seen me leave for work. Me and the same neighbour have a spare copy of each other's door key so I told her to come in and lock it up for me. Me and my neighbours tell each other when we're on holiday and take turns to pick up mail left on the door mat or in the letter box so places look occupied.

    Getting decent locks is still a necessity but build good relations with your neighbours so you've got more eyes watching over your place at more times of the day, and when you're away for a few days, this is invaluable. There's nobody more interested in making sure your street is crime free than the people who live in the street.

  169. Re:What's that coming over the hill? Is it a monst by xaxa · · Score: 1

    I agree on getting a dog. [...] She bent down and he leaped at her face and bit her just below the eye.

    That would be my reason not to get a dog.

    (And you sound like the dog owners I really hate. The dog attacks your guest, but it's fine, he's a big softie really...)

  170. Re:And a safe for when you're not there to guard i by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Birdshot is not good even at across the room distances. It will not attain needed penetration.

    Nonsense. A shotgun blast is about energy transfer, not penetration. A direct hit anywhere in the torso will be fatal, even with birdshot. At across the room distances, weight of shot and power of charge are the significant factors rather than size of shot, since all the pellets will be striking the target due to small spread. Even with a bullet proof vest, at 10 yards the impact of a chest shot will take you out of the fight, you think you'd be breathing?

  171. Re:What's that coming over the hill? Is it a monst by rainmouse · · Score: 1

    I've actually heard in France people sometimes employ a Guard Goose or two.
    some terrifying good attacks caught on camera : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kd3ioueUNHI&NR=1&feature=fvwp

  172. Re:What's that coming over the hill? Is it a monst by HopefulIntern · · Score: 1

    Surely if your dog barks all night you wont get any sleep either..?
    I know that when my dog hears something go bump in the night he lets me know with a bark, and it is LOUD. Wakes me right up. I just give him a cuddle and go back to sleep, but if he were to bark constantly, I would have had to take some special measures, dog training or whatnot.

  173. Some suggestions by salvador.mrf · · Score: 1

    (internet+sensors)
    sawa project http://dev.hci.uma.pt/sawa/main/login
    wiki http://dev.hci.uma.pt/mediawiki/index.php
    Share sensor data | set policies | record data | sms, email notifications and much more
    you can extend it, creating your notification plugins...


    (gps+gsm) open gps tracker http://www.opengpstracker.org/
    nice project for locating stolen equipment

  174. Crocodile? by Joce640k · · Score: 1

    Even more effective, though they don't bark enough so you might still get your window broken. OTOH there's more chance of the perp being bitten, which is generally a good thing.

    --
    No sig today...
  175. Think like a burgler by Joce640k · · Score: 1

    Try this: Go outside, look in the windows. What can you see? Where would you try to get inside if you see something you like?

    Until you do that you're just guessing.

    PS: Good insurance + data backups is usually the best option.

    --
    No sig today...
  176. A large dog by LeepII · · Score: 1

    Since all theft deterrent systems can be easily beaten the only one that makes sense is playing on peoples fear. A well trained large dog will make a would be thief look for an easier target. If the person is intent on entering your place of residence NOTHING will stop them, not even the dog, but most thieves are in for the quick easy buck, and a German Shepard or an Akita will quickly make them decide your stuff is not worth it.

  177. Re:What's that coming over the hill? Is it a monst by icebraining · · Score: 1

    The best trained 'security' dog will still eat the poisoned meat....

    Actually, that's not true. You can train them to only eat food given by their owners.

  178. Arduino... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here, have a look at this project: http://www.practicalarduino.com/projects/security-sensors

  179. Crazy Goat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We have a goat that we just give acid to before leaving anywhere. Keeps anyone out. The only problem is that the sedative blow darts to calm him down when we get home can get expensive at times.

  180. My two cents. by rindeee · · Score: 1

    I think there are many good, valid approaches to home security, but let me give you mine. It has worked well. I went through the process about 5 years ago of trying to decide how to secure my home. I had a vested interest in something that really made a difference as I was deploying (military Reservist being sent over seas for a year) and leaving my wife and two kids behind. I looked at all the options including commercial, etc. We had good neighbors (this makes a HUGE difference) who helped look out for the place, as well. I ended up doing two things. First, a dog. A very big, very friendly dog. The kids could have bit his ear off and he'd of just rolled his eyes. Stranger comes to the door and he goes all Jekyll and Hyde. Second, IP cameras. Lots of them. The cameras covered inside and outside. I ran the whole show with EvoCam (from Evological) on a Mac. No, it's not open source, but it is only $25 and it's absolutely awesome software that includes customizable motion sensing (with exclusions), triggers, alerts, uploads, recording, remote view, etc. By doing this, I gave my wife the ability to secure the house while she was home using one template, while using another when she was gone. Her big concern was coming home to an empty house at night. Problem solved. She would receive alerts on her phone (with snapshots) if there was so much as a car that turned around in the driveway (or a the neighborhood fox ran through the yard). She even got to where she used it to figure out how the dog was getting into the pantry. The camera/software setup really took the place of a commercial alarm system and aside from the initial cost (Axis cameras aren't cheap, but they're very high quality) it was a very reasonably priced solution.

  181. GSM Alarm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Less than $100 bucks will score you a GSM alarm that will reliably SMS you if someone breaks in.
    Now you can speed dial a close neighbor to intervene or have a camera ready to snap the offenders. You might ring the police, but in my district I get a recording often.

    Then you can ring the unit and
    1) Listen In
    2) Activate Siren
    3) Activate aux output - which could start up webcam

    Note having a webcam is a liability - crooks when they notice they are on camera will attempt to
    destroy everything to find where it is being recorded to and not flee.

    I highly recommend placing high up a strip/sheet of breakable glass on both sides of the door, so if it detaches it falls and breaks. People ignore a door being kicked, broken glass gets their attention up. Just paint it- same color as the door.
    With luck, it may even cut the perp, and eventually DNA evidence will make you happier.

    Its hard to get proper dye bombs, but if you put one at head height or above the door, a dose of silver nitrate may make em sorry. Again lightproof plastic bags under the glass will help
    send a message.

  182. Best security system for the past 12,000 years by vorlich · · Score: 1

    A big dog, preferably a shepherd. On the plus side, owning a dog (or a cat to be fair) improves the quality of your life and extends your life expectancy almost as much as getting married.
    If you are really cheap, a big kennel in a highly visible part of your property with a big empty chain and two large stainless steel dog bowls. If you live in an apartment, omit the kennel and leave the bowls at your front door - one of them should be filled with fresh water. Oh, and you shouldn't bother with the marriage idea either.
    Alternatively there is always a gaggle of geese, who are well respected in the security industry and have a long history in saving various empires including the Roman.
    Empire that is.
    Next!

    --
    Posts, MyBio or Sig, may contain satire, sarcasm, bolded nouns be sardonic or even witty & be Church of SD
  183. Re:And a safe for when you're not there to guard i by tehcyder · · Score: 1

    you've never been to texas I take it

    At least they have the death penalty there, so if you're forced to go there you can always just shoot someone dead and the state will end your misery.

    --
    To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  184. HomeWatch + ioBridge = frontdoor emails me by whitehexagon · · Score: 1

    I had the same question last year after buying a house that I needed to monitor while away on business. In the end I settled on a couple of internet based web cams and a couple of ioBridge modules. Now my front door emails me each time it opens! I can also see real-time temperatures/humidity and turn on extra heaters before I get home. I can switch lights on/off and make the place look occupied. and because I know that non of this would actually stop a thief, I also have the camera setup for motion sensitive video capture which ftps onto a remote server, so at least I might have some evidence of the crime.

  185. Hungry tigers by tehcyder · · Score: 1

    are the best deterrent.

    --
    To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  186. Dog is an armed guard, not an alarm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Once you have had a dog and seen it react to a perceived danger, you cant be convinced that is better protection at that cost.

    I have had professional security systems installed for 10 years at home and see them fail by a miriad of reasons over time, any security system needs permanent maintenance and tweaking. I have deployed almost all that is on market for remote surveillance on remote premises of my corporation and Im familiar with their problems even if they work, for example I have seen 3 guys stole a one of those huge rolls of copper wire for telephony (weighting 3 tons) under 3 minutes, which made the alarm useless at all because the average response time of enforcers is usually superior (which sometimes dont seem to eager to arrive on time to dangerous situations btw).

    On the other hand, a dog is a perfect soldier with superhuman skills that *is ready to give its life for its master*, is unaffected by power surges, outages, software errors, or just negligence or lazyness, is non-lethal weapon on most situations but can be lethal if needed, which helps staying yourself out of charges when sh*t hits fan.

    It cant be turned against you if someone gets hold it, it cant be hacked like a webcam to spy on you. It rarely gives a false alarm after being given simple commands. Is a system that can be handled by a kid, a grown up adult, or a disabled person. It can perceive if someone is agressive or excited just with a sniff even if they are smiling.

    It can track a foe on the run for miles. Has a powerful sound alarm incorporated, it also can detect fires or another hazards without extra costs.

    Disabling a dog is akin to disabling an armed guard, is much more difficult than breaking any system. The only thing best than a dog is a squad of armed guards on 24x7 duty and you know what, those use dogs too.

    Given you learn some procedures of safe operation, like you would do with any weapon, is unbeateable for personal defense. And as another commenter said it gets you chicks too at the park, mine also deters other men to be around my wife when she walks it.

  187. sticker proof by bluhatter · · Score: 1

    Don't buy an expensive security system. Just buy the sticker.

    --


    bluHatter
  188. Buy an alarm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Video monitoring is nice, and can even be helpful. But what do you think is going to happen once your home is burglarized? Do you think the local TV stations / newspapers are going to care enough to publish stills from your video feed? Perhaps, but unless you're in an extremely rural area with little to no existing news, it's unlikely. The handful of isolated cases you read about where someone's iPhone / Blackberry / Droid / etc managed to snap a picture of said burglar are just that -- isolated cases. Given the massive volume of thefts daily, there's a reason Slashdot isn't running several thousand of these stories daily.

    There are a number of DIY-oriented alarm systems on the market. I'm most experienced with Visonic equipment, but you should also look at GE, Ademco, and possibly DSC. These are designed to be installed by people with enough technical skill to program a VCR, but who lack any sort of formal installation training. That is to say the operational interfaces are functional and efficient, but not at all polished. I'll refrain from posting links to vendors, but ten seconds on Google will get you several.

    They come in wireless and wired varieties. The GE Concord line is even hybrid, allowing up to 192 zones (for now, "zone" = "sensor", though this isn't always the case). The wireless sensors run at 450MHz, so interference is unlikely. They're supervised, which means that if they don't actively check in within xx minutes, the system alerts the monitoring station to a "trouble" status, and they call you to let you know to check the battery on "living room door". They also generally use lithium batteries, which cost about $5 to replace but last (for me) 4-6 years.

    Nearly all systems also offer backup means of communication to cover you in case the phone line is cut. My Visonic, for example, is IP-based and runs over my cable modem. A burglar would normally have to take the unlikely step of cutting the cable line to silence it. But if my IP box can't reach the central monitoring station, it automatically fails over to my backup GSM module. Even without an alarm, if my cable line goes out, it will send a "trouble - line failure" signal to the monitoring station, and I'll get an SMS alert on my cell phone.

    Quality, UL-listed monitoring will run you $8 - $12 / month. I personally use NextAlarm; again, there are several good providers to choose from. You want to make sure they are UL-listed and have redundant monitoring centers. I have used them for six years and have never, ever had a problem or missed event.

    Like a quality PC, your equipment will run you as much or as little as you want. My base system, including a year of monitoring, was around $260, plus all the extra sensors I ordered. At a minimum, put a magnetic door sensor at each door and a motion detector on each level. Position the motion detector so that an intruder will walk across it at a 45- (ideal) or 90- (acceptable) degree angle. Avoid placement where someone would walk directly towards / away from the sensor; this is their weakest manner of detection. For optimum protection, add a magnetic door sensor at every window. Every modern alarm comes with a "home" mode, which allows you to arm only the perimeter sensors and ignore the motion detectors (so you can move about freely inside your home while the system is armed).

    And as other posters have pointed out, burglars take the path of least resistance. A "protected by (reputable alarm company here)" sticker on every window will help deter a burglary in the first place. Do not -- I repeat, do not -- get the generic-looking ones from Radio Shack. Burglars know what those look like, and they know they're fake.

    DIY alarms can be a lot of fun and can offer a great opportunity for some serious hardware tinkering, especially if you decide to REALLY drill down into it and build your own from scratch (not recommended unless you know what you're doing). Enjoy!

  189. Re:And a safe for when you're not there to guard i by blennidae · · Score: 1

    "If the perp ISN'T within three steps or so (and doesn't have his own gun pointed at you) you'll have a hard time justifying a self-defense shoot." - A friend of mine shot a burglar who was in the process of jumping off my friends second story balcony after throwing an expensive bicycle off first. He hit the punk right in the ass and the bullet traveled down the back of the leg and exited behind the knee. It left that loser with a permanent limp to remind him not to steal things. Police showed up, did their usual question and answer session, and hauled the thief off in an ambulance and later to jail. My friend was never charged with anything. In fact one of the cops told him good job because apparently the cops were after this guy for a while. This happened about 7 or 8 years ago, so the laws may have changed.

    --
    Rejoice in your insanity, there really is no other way
  190. Re:And a safe for when you're not there to guard i by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Rock salt. And you can't be charged with deadly weapon assault.

  191. Re:And a safe for when you're not there to guard i by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are things to be said about birdshot, 00, and slugs. Birdshot is great as it will spread nice and have almost no kick so you can keep on target with little effort, if using birdshot always aim for face as while it may not penetrate much it will always make someone sit down if you hit them there, you can step on their throat after that... 00 is great for shooting through walls and is even rather effective of putting a lot of hurt on people that may come in with vests. Slugs kick really hard, put a lot of energy into that hit but you you have no spread, on the plus side if you hit no matter what the situation that person is not getting right up, vest or not...

  192. Some recommendations by Ex-MislTech · · Score: 1

    If your security system can be defeated by turning off power to your house
    your security is pretty limited.

    Have it on a UPS aka battery back up.

    A noise maker alarm system will make most thieves look for an easier target.

    If you want to know who it is then get a few video cameras and have a PC
    record the video when the video detects motion.

    Then to avoid then steal the data have it rsync to a remote computer
    at a friend's house, your work or some other location.

    You can also have the monitoring PC send an email if there is a breach.

    Any weapon system that can do permanent injury is illegal, but I think
    you could get away with some nice tasty bear mace ;)

    That would have them really hating life.

    --
    google "32 trillion offshore needs IRS attention"
  193. Re:And a safe for when you're not there to guard i by confused+one · · Score: 1

    That answer works for me. As I said, I have seen #4 buck recommended from time to time suggested as the smallest to use for defensive purposes. Birdshot (the parent's suggestion) will work if you're within a few feet; but, it's less than ideal.

  194. Re:What's that coming over the hill? Is it a monst by saider · · Score: 1

    I don't mind when the dogs bark at people walking by. I know most of my neighbors do not mind either. It gets old when the dogs bark at squirrels, birds, and overflying airplanes. Those are the dogs that bark too much.

    --


    Remember, You are unique...just like everyone else.
  195. Re:And a safe for when you're not there to guard i by toastar · · Score: 1

    The Death penalty only applies to blacks and Mexicans down here.
    I know a guy who shot someone in the face and got away with it, And he was drunk to boot.

  196. Re:And a safe for when you're not there to guard i by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

    I wish I lived in texas, sounds like a lot of fun, a lot more fun then in canada!

  197. Re:What's that coming over the hill? Is it a monst by BLKMGK · · Score: 1

    Yes, I had dogs, as many as four at a time, for 15 years and one night I came home and surprised them and they defended my home. This person wasn't a guest she was someone who lived there and had she understood that growling wasn't a warm welcome and had so much as said a word to the dog it would have been fine. In the end she wasn't harmed more than a bruise and she understood her part in the misunderstanding. Sorry but I don't see where the dog made some huge mistake here.

    Seriously if you cannot understand the dynamics at work then yeah don't get a dog. We'll all be better off not having to take care of it when you get bored and dump it at the pound.

    --
    Build it, Drive it, Improve it! Hybridz.org
  198. Re:What's that coming over the hill? Is it a monst by Critical+Facilities · · Score: 1

    Where's the VAN??????

  199. Just one simple thing to keep my house secure by gearloos · · Score: 1

    A Great Dane named Tiny -- works for me. Nobody even comes close to my place.

    --
    "Computers are a lot like Air Conditioners" "They both work great until you start opening Windows"
  200. Here's how mine is set up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I bought a house that had a monitored security system in it. I didn't pick up the contract and, of course, the system didn't really work well if I didn't let the company monitor it.

    Here's what I did:

    I bought a $250 netbook from Costco. Built in UPS (aka the netbook battery), audio card, screen and keyboard for troubleshooting, and the CPU was certainly powerful enough to run anything I might want a home security system to do.

    Measured the voltages of the existing security system sensors and found out they're just simple open/closed switches. So, I bought a labjack (http://labjack.com/) board and hooked up the sensors to it.

    Bought an X10 transceiver to flash the lights when the alarm goes off (also to control my Christmas lights).

    Bought two D-Link wireless IP cameras (http://www.dlink.com/products/?pid=664) and put it in my front window and front room.

    Wrote a small Python program that has states (Armed full, armed home, perimeter, unarmed, etc...), reads the voltages from labjack and run scripts when voltage exceed or go under certain levels. Those scripts grab pictures from the camera, SMS text me, and set of the alarm sound (which is just a couple of speakers driven off a 10 watt amp connected to the audio out plug on the netbook) whenever the alarm is tripped.

    Set up an XML gateway and had my wife write an Android app to communicate with it that allows us to set the alarm, view the logs and view pictures from our phones. (I love being married to a fellow geek!)

    It was a super fun project (more fun that I thought it would be) and it works really well. I have the old alarm system stickers still on the door for deterrence, and it's nice for my wife to know that there's no one breaking into the house when I'm on a business trip and she's sleeping at home alone. Also, when we're traveling, I at least figure any thieves won't stick around with an alarm going off so I'm unlikely to lose much. No false alarms, and I've been running it for a year now.

    I'm thinking of open sourcing the software I wrote...but I've moved off to other projects so I haven't gotten around to it.

  201. Re:What's that coming over the hill? Is it a monst by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The right to keep and arm bears shall not be infringed
    (someone had to say it)

  202. DIY IP Based Security System by AndyMcL · · Score: 1

    When I was searching for a DIY home security system I turned to Slashdot too. Reading through the comments I found some possible companies to go with. I settled on Ingrid, who has since changed their name to LifeShield. I installed everything myself and have been happy with the service for over 3 years.

    www.lifeshield.com (used to be ingridhome.com)

    I just went to their site and was surprised to see Dan Marino pop out and endorse the system. Maybe that is to drum up sales in Florida? LOL

    -Andy

  203. Psy-ops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I live in the Southern US, where most everyone is a Christian. Someone broke into my garage once and stole some tools and a broken lawnmower. I put up stickers that say, "Protected by Witchcraft". Superstitions criminals leave me alone now.

  204. Re:What's that coming over the hill? Is it a monst by networkBoy · · Score: 1

    my brother's neighbor on one side has a Great Dane, and on the other there is a Saint Bernard. Both would lick you to death, the Bernard may also crush you... Neither will bite AFAICT, they are so friendly. My kids have taken pony rides on the Bernard.

    --
    whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
  205. So easy nowadays, do it all yourself! by epsurveillance · · Score: 1

    Well, you can look at getting pretty much a premade up kit, as they are pretty easy to install and setup and configure nowadays. I know they also have ability for remote access from computer, iPhone, Blackberries, and window mobile phones too which can make this more attractive. Mobile lifestyles have even moved to CCTV which is pretty cool and lets face it, the public almost expects this functionality. This site at www.cctvhotdeals.com has a ton of stuff at really good prices, and gives a good starting point to look at just what is out there in terms of systems. I have bought several systems and installed them for family and friends as I am THAT guy whom everyone goes to for some reason, and I can say they install very quickly on premade systems, and is only a couple hours to be up and running. (the longest time was determination where to mount the cameras..if you think you know where they will go...you dont..lol...) You can do everything yourself and saves alot of $$$, time, and no need for appointments, or service calls.

  206. Armor by ColoradoAuthor · · Score: 2, Funny

    Here's a simple, proven technique for damage mitigation: A steel plate covering your entertainment center (or a workbench or whatever piece of furniture contains your most valuable stuff). Attach it with 3 bolts, and hide a wrench in a convenient spot. But here's the key to this technique: WELD a few dozen additional bolt heads onto the plate. You can remove the armor in just a few seconds when you come home, but the burglar, not knowing the scheme, will quickly run out of patience.

    At a shop building which had been suffering from weekly burglaries, despite all manner of locks and alarms, this technique instantly and permanently stopped the losses.

  207. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  208. My home-built system. by trevdak · · Score: 1

    My place got robbed in June 2009. I've taken several measures to prevent it from happening again. The robbery was pulled off by breaking a hole through a lexane window, climbing in, and unlocking the back door. I think they put a little kid through the hole in the back window because it was a tiny hole to queeze through and they stole a few toys I had lying around along with my electronics.

    Low-tech security:

    Renter's insurance. I wish I had that before the first robbery.

    I chained my computer and my TV to the radiator. The chain is actually very well hidden, so it doesn't look too awful. The chain on my computer goes in through a PCI slot to a giant padlock, so if they wanted my computer they'd have to either tear apart the case, cut the lock, or take apart my computer piece by piece. The chain is pretty darn thick... I couldn't cut it with bolt cutters and it took about 5 minutes to get through with a grinder.

    I put a protector over my door lock, and bars over my back windows where the break-in happened. Lexane is nice, but it looked like glass. It doesn't deter people from trying to break in, it just stops them once they try. And when it's fastened to a crappy wooden windowframe, the frame just gets torn out. The bars are attached directly to the brick

    Oh, and I got a dog.

    I also tell my neighbors when I'm leaving because they noticed my back door was open and my window was smashed for 36 hours before telling my landlord about it.

    High-tech security:

    I wrote a home security system using VB.net and PHP. The VB application runs on my home computer, and has a camera that looks down my hall. If it detects motion, it takes a picture, posts it online to my PHP script, which sends a text message to my phone with a link to the image. Then, the VB application plays a really loud alarm sound.

    If you're interested in using my system for yourself, send my username a gmail and I'll hook you up with a download. I warn you, though, it's fairly customized for me and might not work on your computer.

  209. Re:And a safe for when you're not there to guard i by COMON$ · · Score: 1

    Ok, how about you come over and stand still while I hit you with some bird shot at 12-20 feet...I am pretty sure that will stop if not incapacitate you in your tracks unless you have nerves of steel. You evidentally have very little experience with guns. Don't believe me? Go out, borrow a shotgun, get said bird shot, head to the country and set up a good watermelon at 10-20 feet and see what happens.

    --
    CS: It is all sink or swim...oh and did I mention there are sharks in that water?
  210. ultimately nothing by KiwiCanuck · · Score: 1

    There is no way to prevent theft. All you can do is discourage it. Keep copies of all important things/documents in a bank safety deposit box. Data storage is a bit of an issue. I hide my backup server in the basement rafters. Again not 100%, but hopefully they just take my computer and other electronics. Really, the best thing to do is not to become emotionally attached to stuff. Good luck.

  211. Hired wired alarms are the way to go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you do install an alarm use the hard-wired type. Put one in my house over 15 years ago and it works great. Someone tried my front door open and it activated the alarm. Scared them off, the monitoring company called the house, me at work, and the cops. Cops got there before me and were gone once they confirmed no entry into the home.

    Look for professionals in your area that sell the parts. I found a guy who installed systems for 20 years then started selling the pieces and parts. Drew him a basic floor plan of my house and he recommended the proper equipment. Spent about $800 on the system. Good investment. Expanded the system when we did an addition on the house. Upgrades included installing fire detection in the form of heat sensors and smoke detectors.

  212. Lets see: by geekoid · · Score: 1

    How to reduce security risk:

    Get a dog...nothing that can fit into a purse.
    Move to a safer neighborhood
    Get a motion sensor alarm that's loud. Be sure it has a 10 second delay. Something the counts down so intruder can hear it would be nice.
    You can find a sticker from an alarm company and put it on your door. Social engineering can work well
    Counter to what some people are going to say: A gun won't be very helpful in most situations. If you aren't home, they will steal it. If you are home, then you need time to be able to get to it, prepare it and then give warning. If you are surprised, it won't do any good, and the person breaking in can steal it.

    If you do get a gun, get training and be sure when choosing the weapon to remember bullets can go through drywall, and you have neighbors.

    I'm not against guns, and believe people have every right to have a fire arm as long as thy are responsible for the events that take place involving that weapon.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  213. Re:And a safe for when you're not there to guard i by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Slugs go through walls and hit children in the street, neighbor's yard, or neighbor's house. Number 4 or 5 shot, and most likely even 6, can stop someone from across the room. Your average home break-in is not perpetrated by an action-movie hero. A few pellets striking home would be enough to stop most people. If you're competent with the weapon you own, you could disable without killing a human from across a 30 foot room -- that's 10 yards, a shot most bird hunters would consider easy when shooting at a fast flying target the size of a dinner plate. People tend to be much less freely moving and much bigger targets than game birds.

    If you own a gun and can't shoot that well with it, put in more time practicing.

  214. Dog Maintenance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No no no. You people are still on the "every 3000 miles" schedule.

    Get a good Japanese brand dog, they're made in America anyhow these days.

    The "True Cost to Own" is very low.

  215. Home Security by way2slo · · Score: 1

    Referring to home monitoring services and systems as "Home Security" is a bit of a misnomer. They don't "secure" anything. At best, it's just a log file for who enters and leaves. And even then, you are not assured of getting a positive ID to catch them later.

    The original poster said "things I don't want stolen". That means Physical Security, not cameras, DVRs, and computers, not monitoring. Guns are fine, but do no good if you are not home to use it. What they really need are enhanced door and window security measures.

    Deterrence. This is the first step. Make your place a "Hard Target", meaning that it appears to look harder or more dangerous to get into than the place next door. The most obvious deterrent is light. Keep lights on inside and out. Sound is another, but if thieves get close enough for that it's time for other things. Things like extra physical security.

    Dead-bolts, latches, etc are physical security but can also act as a deterrent. Locks can be picked, but if thieves see they have to pick several they may decide to pass you by instead. You can have them all keyed off the same key. Inside latches or bracing are excellent as now they'll have to pretty much tear the door or window off just to get inside, which would attract too much attention. However, you cannot engage them when you are not there, but you can use them on all but the one entrance you plan on using when you return.

    Another door attack is jimmying or separating the frame from the door enough to allow the bolts to slide out. The fix is to have a solid frame around the door that does not bend easily. If you build, you can have rather large steel poles put in place.

    Another attack is to just kick the door in and rip all the bolts out of the frame. The fix for that is to have the frame reinforced with a long metal plate to replace the small one that is just around the bolt. Strong screws secure the plate to the frame of the house.

    Windows are tricky because we want to see out, but thieves can just cut or smash the glass. Replace old windows with modern ones that have extra security features like double locks and those tabs that prevent the window from opening fully. Also, there is a security product out there that puts a plastic sheet on the inside of the window that reinforces the glass like the front windshield of a car. A thief could crack the glass with a crow bar, but the plastic holds it all together. Essentially, they could swing their arms off before they got though the plastic.

    Beyond that, you may want to get a safe that you can secure to the wall or floor, depending what you are trying to protect. Some wall safes are made to be hidden, which are more for home beauty than security. Don't bother with biometrics, just get a keypad.

  216. Build a Budget DIY home security system by celem · · Score: 1

    I have installed commercial-grade systems, such as those made by ADEMCO, GE, etc. Such systems can beep a Beeper but it is crude because these commercial systems are designed to report via a commercial monitoring center service. Monitoring services can be found selling on the Internet for $10 monthly. You can buy all supplies on eBay. There are several commercial suppliers that sell retail on eBay. A super-cheap alternative is to buy an IP-camera and install it in your apartment. Cheap, $80 Chinese FOSCAM cameras can used as a security system IF you leave high-speed internet running in your apartment while you are away. IP-cameras can be found on eBay (search for FOSCAM). These cameras contain a complete ucLinux system with an internal web server. You can access the camera remotely and, on th PTZ versions, remotely control the pan/tilt to look around the room. These cameras contain security capabilities where you can set it to email you 6 photos (taken a second apart) of whatever tripped its integral motion detector (based on a percentage of pixel change). Also there are external contact closure contacts that you can hook to any external sensor that will cause it to send an email or an email with 6 photos. Finally, there is a set of external contacts that you can use to remotely operate any device that detects a contact closure, such as an electric door lock. For a simple, cheap security system that also gives you photos of the intruder that you can provide the police, a $80+/- IP-camera is a viable choice.

  217. Re: Dog (false positives) by geekoid · · Score: 1

    Bu the dog can be trained to reduce false positives, as well as learn which people are ok to mass, and which aren't. Also good for alerting people when robots hiding in human skin show up at the door.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  218. 3 easy steps by tracelements23 · · Score: 1

    Step 1: dog with a loud bark. Not even a guard dog, or a big dog, just a dog with a good bark and a predilection to use it. Step 2: Glock 19, the easiest-shooting, multiple-use handgun on the market. Concealed carry or home defense, it'll have you covered. Step 3(this can be step 2, also, depends on your exposure to firearms): Take a firearms and self defense training course. Hell, even if you don't do either of the suggestions above, take a defense course. You'll meet like-minded people who can help you with home security ideas.

  219. Re:And a safe for when you're not there to guard i by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bullshit. 7/8 oz (or more) of #8 lead pellets flying in tight formation will seriously fuck up thin-skinned animals like people at across-the-room distances. I have seen the results.

  220. Re:And a safe for when you're not there to guard i by geekoid · · Score: 1

    Thats not fair, it also applies to the mentally handicapped.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  221. Don't get a cat! by toxonix · · Score: 1

    Cats are useless against burglars. They are complete cowards. Dogs are much better, and not cowards. I had a break a few years ago and had to get new doors. The old doors were easily kicked in. I don't find cameras or alarms to be all that useful, except for maybe identifying burglars after the fact. So I installed heavy doors with steel frames and deadbolts. The heaviest door on the market is still not to difficult to kick in. I re-reinforced everything with 1/4" steel and angle iron. Then I installed security doors outside of the main doors, which also have deadbolts and require at least a large heavy duty pry bar to get open. The burglars were not interested in things that they couldn't get rid of easily. They ignored $40k worth of vintage electronics, some very nice hunting rifles, a very nice and expensive long range target rifle, yet they did manage to steal 40 rounds of hand loaded ammunition which will only fit one gun! Not sure what they plan to do with that. So, to keep these things safe, and out of the wrong hands, I also installed a folding steel security gate that prevents anyone from entering the 'expensive' part of the house. It is anchored into concrete and uses a tungsten shielded lock. All of this cost around $300. Physical barriers are probably the best deterrents. If it takes too long, too much work or too many tools, they're going to give up.

  222. How about a fake barking dog by badzilla · · Score: 1

    An electronic alarm which when triggered plays an "amazingly realistic" barking dog sound
    http://www.amazon.co.uk/X10-DK10U-Barking-DM10E-External/dp/B000KB2DFO

    --
    "Don't belong. Never join. Think for yourself. Peace." V.Stone, Microsoft Corporation
  223. Here's what I do by SnarfQuest · · Score: 1

    Start with a moat. When people come by to look at it, you hit them with your mind control rays. Send them off to empty their bank account into yours, then have them do sentry duty, and build more defenses, like pit traps. It's especally satisfying when you catch a would-be theif and turn them into one of your minions.

    The only real problem occurs when they hit critical mass. Your minion staff is growing rapidly, and more traps are being built than you can keep track of. At this point, it's time to escape before you end up caught in one of your own traps. The mind blasted minions usually get confused without your leadership, and end up calling themselves scientologists.

    --
    Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
  224. I'll help install it. by lazyforker · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Just let me know your address, and what time you leave for work so I can meet you.
    BTW - how big is your residence? A small van's-worth? A small moving truck size? Bigger?

  225. Re:And a safe for when you're not there to guard i by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1
    The best choice for a firearm for home defense is not a handgun but a shotgun. Hand guns have 2 problems for home defense:
    1. They tend to over penetrate and exit your house
    2. it is easy to miss compared to a shotgun.

    Load the shell with rock salt. Bird shot (never seen #40 parent probably meant #4) is too fine even magnum goose loads won't do much to a person. Rock salt probably won't kill them but it will stop them. Also a shotgun slug has similar or greater penetration to that of a handgun. Buck shot is another good choice and doesn't require hand loading the shell, but there is a good chance of kill the intruder. As the parent suggested a firearm for home defense is something to be taken serious. Also laws on shooting at intruders vary state to state so this is also something to keep in mind. I wouldn't recommend a firearm for home defense if you have small children as remember you need to be able to get to the firearm before the intruder can get to you and easy to access fire arms kids seem to believe are wonderful play things. I do advocate training for a fire arm such as a conceal carry course, hunter fire arm safety, or even the NRA "Personal Protection" firearms course (never heard of this one before) so as to become familiar with proper handling, storing, and usage of a fire arm.

    As a side note even thought I own several fire arms I wouldn't be using them for home defense for the above mentioned reasons. They are either too powerful (both hunting rifles) for the purpose of home defense and all including the shotgun are locked up and stored properly

    --
    Time to offend someone
  226. Re:And a safe for when you're not there to guard i by Reziac · · Score: 3, Informative

    From your cited site: "Lessons learned: A car door doesn't protect you against shotguns either."

    My personal protection weapon is a 20ga. shotgun with #4 birdshot (aka "goose loads"). At close range it blows a hole in flesh that you can put both fists into. It's still lethal at house-or-yard distances (up to maybe 30-40 feet). I've used it to kill large animals with heavy haircoats; humans are, if anything, less well protected by average clothing and flesh. (I don't imagine most burglars put on their kevlars before going out for a night's work. Tho maybe there should be an OSHA regulation about that. ;)

    Now, light birdshot at 50 yards or so, all that does is sting or at most puncture skin. But point-blank it will still put a serious hole in you. Even a popper or blank can kill at close range. Ask Jon-Erik Hexum if you don't believe me.

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  227. Re:And a safe for when you're not there to guard i by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

    It does not get the needed penetration, I have fired into clay to test this.

  228. Re:And a safe for when you're not there to guard i by Reziac · · Score: 1

    That sounds like what we used to call "rat shot" in a .22 cartridge. I think it's technically size 12 shot. Not much penetration but good for killing snakes and gophers. I'm all out of 'em and haven't been able to find any more. :(

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ratshot

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  229. Think about this a little more by sean.peters · · Score: 1

    I have several guns, and they are all traceable because I bought them legally.

    Sure, they're traceable... to you. Not to the guys who stole them from you, or to the guys the thief sold them to. So when they get used in a crime, and either the shell casings or the weapon itself are recovered... it's your door the police will be knocking on.

    Large gangs breaking into a home to get guns is almost unheard of. They might hit a pawnshop or gun store, but not an individual's house.

    The biggest source of weapons used in crimes is various sorts of illegal sales, but still, around 10% of them are no kidding stolen weapons. It's hardly unheard of.

    1. Re:Think about this a little more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, they're traceable... to you. Not to the guys who stole them from you, or to the guys the thief sold them to. So when they get used in a crime, and either the shell casings or the weapon itself are recovered... it's your door the police will be knocking on.

      WTF? Should we assume that the police will be knocking on his door because when the "large, heavily armed group" made off with all his guns, he somehow failed to notice? Maybe he was too busy baking a pie?

      Also, shell casings by themselves would be useless in most states.

      - T

  230. Guns Attract Criminals by woodsrunner · · Score: 1

    The downside of guns, is they tend to attract criminals as they are useful tools in committing other crimes and have a ready black market: for a stolen item, you get the most buck for the bang as opposed to trying to flog the action figures, comic books and decrepit hardware with weird OS's that most geeks tend to hoard.

    Guns are light, easy to transport (as opposed to a large LCD) and unless you're into shooting sports the large investment leave you unprepared to defend your home. And even if you are a good shot, chances are it's either not at hand when needed (locked in the other room), the breakin occurs whe you won't be around to use it and just have it straight out stolen, or worst case ontario have it or use it on yourself in the heat of the moment.

    The one time I had a home invasion, the first thing I did was hide my gun, a beautiful Israeli AK-47, as I didn't want it to be involved in the pending brawl.

    I come from a family with a long tradition of shooting and piss off my ATF cousins when I outshoot them at family get togethers. Still I don't own anything more than a pellet rifle. Shooting anything beyond that is an expensive sport that I don't find compelling enough to invest in either the time or gear.

    There have been a number of break-ins recently in my area. The place two doors down has had three. In general, the targets had one thing in common: gun owners.

    The fact that I have a yard full of sled dogs and my house is clearly visible from the road are probably two factors I have not yet been victimized. And to be honest, would appreciate some kids hauling off my collection ancient hardware just to avoid the recycling fees.

  231. A couple of thoughts by sean.peters · · Score: 1

    Ditch the pistol and just go with the shotgun. Even well-trained police don't hit the target that well with a pistol - your chance of doing it in the excitement of a home invasion is pretty minimal. It's a lot harder to miss with a shotgun.

    For home defense load your 12-gauge shotgun with fine birdshot loads, like number 40

    I do a lot of hunting and I've never even heard of #40 - the smallest I've ever seen is #8, and that's pretty fine.

  232. Memory by sean.peters · · Score: 1

    ell 'ya what. I'll go take a look later on. It's been a long time since I bought it. Maybe my memory of the magic number is faulty.

    I think that would be a good idea. #8's are really quite small - #40 would have to be like dust.

  233. The legal aspects are the least of your worries by sean.peters · · Score: 1

    Shooting to kill is not a matter of avoiding legal consequences - it's your own safety at risk. If the situation is so far gone that you need to shoot someone to make them stop what they're doing or about to do - shooting to wound just won't do. You almost certainly won't be able to do it - about your only choice would be to hit them in the leg, and you're highly likely to miss.

    If you need to shoot someone to protect yourself, you need to put two bullets in their center of mass, and that's probably going to kill them. If you can't deal with that, don't shoot.

  234. Keep it simple by asoduk · · Score: 1

    Good neighbors beat a security system any day of the week.

  235. Well... by sean.peters · · Score: 1

    Realistically, there are two aspects to the security problem: one is defending your property, and the other is defending your person (and family). The approach discussed above is for the situation of burglary when you're not home, and it works fine for that. But when someone breaks in while you're home... who knows what they're going to do? In that situation, you really need a dog or a gun or something.

    When thinking about a gun, though, bear in mind that the cure can be worse than the disease. In most US neighborhoods, a home invasion situation is tremendously unlikely. How likely is it that your kids are going to get ahold of your pistol? Or that you'll accidentally shoot a family member coming in late at night?

    1. Re:Well... by idle12 · · Score: 1

      > Or that you'll accidentally shoot a family member coming in late at night?

      That's sure as heck what I do. I load up on whiskey with my shotgun in my lap. If I hear even the smallest sound I start blazing off shots in the dark in all directions.

  236. Umm... "pain field generators"? by sean.peters · · Score: 1

    The only systems I'm aware of are the military's "Active Denial" and LRAD systems. Active Denial is essentially a microwave beam, and the military describes it as "less lethal". Obviously, there's a very serious risk of severe burns at the ranges you'd be talking about. Probably illegal, and dangerous to have in your house in any case - what if you set it off yourself?

    LRAD is an acoustic system that emits very powerful sound beams. No real risk of lethality, but deafness is certainly a potential problem, both for you and any intruders. Again, probably illegal. And your neighbors are likely to get pissed off in the event of false alarms, when the 100dB device goes off in the middle of the night.

    I'm not sure if you were just kidding about the locking in the thieves part or the whole pain-field thing.

    1. Re:Umm... "pain field generators"? by digital+photo · · Score: 1

      Most definitely not serious, hen e the tongue-in-cheek comment. But it's fairly strAight forward to build a diy version of the acoustics based LRAD.

      Hypothetically, the key component is generating the right signal waveform to produce the intended effect.

      Sound can be constrained to with. The premises with proper acoustic design. The db range would range from 90db to 120db...

      If the walls are properly deafened and the windows or drop bars or locks effect a seal, then you would be able to contain the sound, thus targeting the intruders and not annoying the neighbors.

      This is even more true if your valuables are kept I an inner room of the house, which can be better sealed off. One could rig sensors so that when intruders are I. Different rooms, those rooms can self-seal, thus restraining and keeping intruders apart from one another.

      All hypothetical, of course...

  237. Re:And a safe for when you're not there to guard i by COMON$ · · Score: 1
    That is odd, what did you use? Hard or soft clay? we used to use bird shot to do some pretty massive damage to fruit on fenceposts (didn't have much use for bird shot we used 6-8 shot in our 12 and 20 gauge). Sure it did not demolish the fruit but I sure as heck wouldn't want to be on the receiving end. Was also effective at removing birds from the ol garden at 20 yards I googled a couple results:

    Given this was 9 shot not this mythical 40 shot spoken above, what is that? dust?

    http://in.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090313044828AAvUOoT

    http://www.firearmstactical.com/briefs10.htm

    --
    CS: It is all sink or swim...oh and did I mention there are sharks in that water?
  238. Assume it was #8 by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    Took a look: Looks like it WAS #8 and my memory was faulty.

    This is a life-or-death issue. Please ignore my previous pushing of the illusory #40 and substitute #8 wherever it occurs in the remainder of my posts above.

    With that substitution, does anyone have a problem with the stopping power of a 12-gauge load of #8 at under 15 feet?

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  239. Re:And a safe for when you're not there to guard i by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    [Quotes from Texas laws permitting use of lethal force to defend property and codifying a "fleeing felon" rule]

    Indeed, Texas was the main exception I was aware of when I included "in most jurisdictions" in the earlier post.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  240. Arduino of course! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't believe nobody mentioned this yet (or maybe its buried in the comments), but I replaced my ADT system with about $100 in arduino parts and some free time. I bought an Arduino, an ethernet shield, a $5 piezo, some $3 magnetic reed switches, various cheapo parts and with some wiring and time, I made a alarm that sounds the piezo whenever a door goes off. I have a button to press to silence the alarm, and I have wireless Ip cameras that it can attach images from whenever an alarm goes off so i can see who triggered the alarm. Right now I have it email my smartphone!

  241. Inventorize and prevent by Chimel31 · · Score: 1

    First place to start is listing the stuff you own. I have mine on a Google Docs spreadsheet, with tabs to categorize it. I can access it even if my computer gets stolen.
    This will be useful for the insurance. Insurance won't replace anything, just pay you some, so prevention and common sense is really the key:
    Securing the points of entrance, adding deterrents such as cameras and sirens, neighborhood watch, random lights and music, not publishing when you're going to vacations in the social sites, having your mail redirected or picked up, having a large mailbox big enough for parcels, automated shutters, etc.

    Store your documents offline, like a scan of your passport and important papers. Digitalize as much as you can: I have ripped all my CDs and have a backup at my family's. I started ripping my DVDs too, although it's too big for backups. But at least I won't lose too much if someone steals my CDs or DVDs. Try to rip the most valuable ones, or the rarest.

    It's really too bad that with all the technology around, there is no world standard for home automation and security.
    It makes the whole thing far too complex to setup for the average joe.

    Lol at all those who keep repeating dogs and guns, like the former is an option in an apartment, or like the latter is useful when you're away to anything else but getting your gun stolen too.

  242. Re:Risk Management - without guns by kubitus · · Score: 1
    I am glad that after plenty of wannabe gunmen somebody sensibly argues on what to do!

    If you keep things at home which can be replaced, insure them.

    keep valuable afap in a bank vault.

    Keep a low profile and make your home ( and yourself ) lokk rather lowly.

    burglars will investigate - most break-ins are actually targeted and not by chance!

    And if you want to be bored and annoyed, install an alarm system which alerts you by SMS

    then look up via the Internet you surveillance cam.

  243. Dogs and guns: USians only. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    OK, lets get some things straight.

    All this dogs and guns nonsense applies mostly to the US where
    a) You have lots of space.
    b) You worship guns irrationally.

    for the rest of us, who mostly live in urban environments, often in cramped conditions (try buying a flat some time in London, count yourself lucky if you can afford something of 50 or 60 sqm, great living conditions for you and that mastiff you want to live with) and where guns are forbidden or heavily restricted, all the USian chest thumping about dogs and guns is farcical posturing.

    In the UK your home alarm guarantees you will have a cop in 10 minutes or less. The police (not a security firm, but the Police itself) are understandably very thorough to ensure false alarms are kept to a minimum.

    As for guns, thieves know you don;t have them so they rarely use them, and anyway most people would make a bad situation worse.

    So protection number one are locks, closely followed by quality doors and windows. It is shocking to see how many doors have hinges in the outside of the property, waiting for the kind screwdriver that will liberate them form their oppressive frame.....

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  244. Lawyer sign by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about having a sign "The current resident is a lawyer and you are being monitored"

  245. You can buy a "bunny rabbit" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But which *kind* of "bunny rabbit" would you like?

  246. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm a security system installer from FL and I have to say that oppose to the claims in some comments a camera system will actually can do you a lot of good.
    I've also tried many DVRs and PC based cards and also Zoneminder. IMHO zoneminder is more of a proof of concept and is not really usable in it's current state.

    Personally, I dislike to purchase cheap sh*# so my best advice will be to keep away from kits you can get @ costco or frys.
    If you have a Windows machine with good specs I'll load on it a GeoVision DVR card. you can get a GV800 4CH for around $400 nowadays. If you need a dedicated system and you don't want to use your PC you can purchase a decent standalone DVR for around $100 each channel or video feed.
    Nuvico makes some entry level quality DVRs and Digital WatchDog has some nice features as well, however if you want the good stuff with email alerts and nice GUI I'll get a GeoVision DVR Card.
    Anyway when you choose a DVR you want to consider 2 most important factors which are Frame Rate and Resolution. a good frame rate for NTSC(US) system is anywhere from 15 FPS to 30FPS Per channel. The size of the captured video is also important, with bigger resolution meaning more details in the scene. D1 (720x480px) is the most you can get for Analog system. CIF is 1/4 of the size of D1.
    The specs on the DVR will tell you both, but you need to remember to divide the frames per Qty of channels. ie a 4 channels DVR which stats 60FPS is actually 60/4=15FPS per channel.
    As for the cams, you should expect to pay ~$200 a cam if you get the good stuff like Samsung or Nuvico.

    You could also get a cheap kit from costco for $400 which will include the (not-too-good) DVR and cams but expect a disappointment in features and in the video that you will provide the police.
    As many things in life, a security system is also something to do right or don't do it (now).

     

  247. Re:And a safe for when you're not there to guard i by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

    Newton disagrees. Place the butt of a shotgun on your chest and pull the trigger. The same force moving that shot forward is moving the gun back. This ain't the movies, kiddo.

  248. Re:And a safe for when you're not there to guard i by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

    People are not made of fruit.

    I have never heard of #40 until now, my tests involved #6 and modeling clay.

    The following from your own link agrees with me.

    Birdshot, because of its small size, does not have the mass and sectional density to penetrate deeply enough to reliably reach and damage critical blood distribution organs. Although birdshot can destroy a great volume of tissue at close range, the permanent crush cavity is usually less than 6 inches deep, and this is not deep enough to reliably include the heart or great blood vessels of the abdomen. A gruesome, shallow wound in the torso does not guarantee a quick stop, especially if the bad guy is chemically intoxicated or psychotic. If the tissue crushed by the pellets does not include a vital cardiovascular structure there's no reason for it to be an effective wound.

  249. Re:And a safe for when you're not there to guard i by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

    Humans cannot be disabled without killing. You need him to stop now, that requires 12" in gelatin.

    The FBI agrees with me.

    http://www.firearmstactical.com/briefs10.htm

    So do the above.

  250. Re:And a safe for when you're not there to guard i by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What size rooms do you have?

    Either your rooms are convention halls, or you don't have any experience to be making these claims.

    I don't have any rooms bigger than 30 feet long. #7 bird shot is devastating at =30' (even without a choke in,) and like he said, will not go through the 'baddie' to be able to hit a neighbor.

  251. Re:Home burglary is NOT dead by brokeninside · · Score: 1

    I've had my house burglarized three times in the past ten years.(Okay, one time was the detached garage.) Two of those times were in Ohio. This past time was in an urban county in Maryland of about a million souls (375,000 households or so) where according to police reports, over 160 residential burglaries happened every month in 2009. That puts the odds of being the victim of a residential burglary at about 1 in 190 over the course of a year.

    As for what they take, anything that can be relatively easily converted to cash, digital video records and iPods, laptops, jewelry, etc. While the pawn shops may be overly filled, things like these move quite easily on Craig's List, eBay, or on the streets and in the schools.

  252. Re:And a safe for when you're not there to guard i by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Birdshot is not good even at across the room distances. It will not attain needed penetration."
    I can't believe he made this statement. Birdshot will not only penetrate, it will blow the crook's head off at some distance. If you happen the miss his head, you will blow the crook's inners out. He doesn't know the power of a shot gun.

    "You don't want to hurt the bad guy you want to stop him."
    I would never be concerned about the welfare of a bad guy.

    "00 is fine, slugs are better."
    A shot gun slug is a bad choice. Your aim has to be perfect. A sawed off shot gun is best, if you can own one as we can here in Texas. Other than that, a shot gun with an 'improved cylinder' is probably best.

  253. Re:And a safe for when you're not there to guard i by COMON$ · · Score: 1

    Correct, the link does agree with you slightly, I think you said that there was no penetration, perhaps you were alluding to it not penetrating organs. The shot would penetrate just fine, it just wouldnt kill unless you got lucky. #6 or #8 would cause enough damage to cripple all but the drugged up perp.

    --
    CS: It is all sink or swim...oh and did I mention there are sharks in that water?