Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: Does Being 'Loyal' Pay As a Developer?

An anonymous reader writes "As a senior developer for a small IT company based in the UK that is about to release their flagship project, I know that if I were to leave the company now, it would cause them some very big problems. I'm currently training the other two 'junior' developers, trying to bring them up to speed with our products. Unfortunately, they are still a long way from grasping the technologies used – not to mention the 'interesting' job the outsourced developers managed to make of the code. Usually, I would never have considered leaving at such a crucial time; I've been at the company for several years and consider many of my colleagues, including higher management, to be friends. However, I have been approached by another company that is much bigger, and they have offered me a pay rise of £7k to do the same job, plus their office is practically outside my front door (as opposed to my current 45 minute commute each way). This would make a massive difference to my life. That said, I can't help but feel that to leave now would be betraying my friends and colleagues. Some friends have told me that I'm just being 'soft' – however I think I'm being loyal. Any advice?"

516 of 735 comments (clear)

  1. Tacos for dinner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Always a shitty situation. Sometimes I think you can grow with a company.. they get bigger, can pay you more/give you better opportunities. In most cases though, it seems that eventually you outgrow a small company. You grow faster than they do, and gradually the outside offers get more and more tempting.

    This kind of thing is hard for me, because I have the same “leaving now would screw these guys” kind of thinking. You’ll be hearing from the “business is business, do what’s best for you, they’d drop you in a heartbeat if they could save a buck” crowd soon enough.

    The only thing I can say is that people are usually not as critical as would seem. I’ve been amazed on several occasions at how quickly someone I would describe as “if we lose him we are screwed” is replaced. People step up and figure shit out. It is rocky, and will cause headaches, but eventually people make it work.

    1. Re:Tacos for dinner by God'sDuck · · Score: 1

      This kind of thing is hard for me, because I have the same “leaving now would screw these guys” kind of thinking.

      There's often a good answer to this: sit down with your boss and tell him about the other offer. If he or she agrees that you are that valuable, he or she may make a substantial counter-offer that lets them keep you and makes everybody happy. Ask for the 7k plus a day or two a week of working at home to compensate for the commute. Ask for everything it would take for you to feel like leaving would be crazy.

      The only risk with this is an evil boss that forever holds it against you. If you think that's a situation, leave. Fast.

    2. Re:Tacos for dinner by randomencounter · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Indeed, give fair notice and make the move if you think the new company is a good match for you.

      Loyalty is a good thing, but sometimes it also holds back the people you are being loyal to.

      --
      Forget diamonds, copyright is forever.
    3. Re:Tacos for dinner by stranger_to_himself · · Score: 1

      Indeed, give fair notice and make the move if you think the new company is a good match for you.

      Loyalty is a good thing, but sometimes it also holds back the people you are being loyal to.

      Agreed - you may not be as indespensible as you think you are, and your manager should have a contingeny for if you (say) get hit by a bus. Another compromise may be to give a longer notice period and offer to consult for the old place for a while?

    4. Re:Tacos for dinner by tonywong · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Talk to employees at your potential new place of employment first.

      You might get offered more but you might be the first cut as well. £7k more is a huge amount but it won't help you if you're unemployed because the shop is one of those hire/fire cycling places. Unless you're the type of person who can find a job within a weekend based on your skillset and persona.

    5. Re:Tacos for dinner by MadKeithV · · Score: 1

      The only risk with this is an evil boss that forever holds it against you.

      Or that the company cannot afford it. Just because they like you and want to keep you doesn't mean they can print money to pay you (unless they are the government).
      Note that they might not be able to afford it even if they do make you a substantial counter offer. Your colleagues WILL find out what happened as soon as you start working from home regularly, and they will want the same privileges. That is going to mean either a mounting cost snowball effect, or it's going to cause other people to leave. In both of those situations you still lose, because either the company actually goes under (or will have no significant future), or instead of leaving yourself you will have caused other people to leave.

    6. Re:Tacos for dinner by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 2

      The problem with this kind of thinking is that more and more the "evil boss" is becoming the norm. It might not be your immediate boss... in fact, it's less likely to be, but in my experience, it's more and more common that somewhere between your boss and the top, there will be some vindictive bastard with an exaggerated sense of self-importance who will make you pay for it. The same happens to people who voice a contrary opinion, no matter how diplomatic and constructive.

      Therefore, if you find yourself in a situation where you don't like the direction things are going, or decisions are frequently made where your input is ignored and it turns out you were right... the only logical choice is to leave.

      My natural instinct has always been towards loyalty, but the people and organizations that value loyalty, or who would exercise it themselves, are becoming more and more rare.

      You need to ask yourself this: If the situations were reversed, would the company dump you like a week-old fish? If your answer is anything but a firm "No", then you owe them loyalty only to the point where it puts you at a disadvantage. I'm not advocating a "screw them before they screw you", but just pointing out that more and more, no one is going to look out for you but yourself, and if you are willing to give loyalty, that's great, but if you expect it back, you're a fool.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    7. Re:Tacos for dinner by teg · · Score: 1

      Or that the company cannot afford it. Just because they like you and want to keep you doesn't mean they can print money to pay you (unless they are the government).

      If they are the government, they usually can afford it even less... flexibility on compensations tends to be very, very limited in the public sector. And budgets are treated different too... no income side, but a sum of money that is already fully allocated.

    8. Re:Tacos for dinner by Fri13 · · Score: 1

      A World without loyalties is a world without moral and ethics.

      Moral and ethics are what are missing from people who are psychopaths and greedy. They have better success to be leaders as they don't need to think about others but than them self's. And then they rule others without feeling bad when they do ethically and morally wrong things, just to save little money or please those who they keep as their friends.

      Leaving a job can be arranged with the others, making a timetable what you want to get done before leaving if the time is just possible.
      Example with case, saying you are planning to leave in about 6 months as you get new people understand what is their tasks and skills are high enough.

      Loyalty is not one way road, it is two way road. When you are loyal to someone, he/she is (should be) loyal to you as well.
      So it is about diplomacy to discuss and then corporation should be loyal to you as well and help worker to leave in better way without neither one feeling bad that worker left the company.

      But when we live the world where there is no loyalty, even people leave their girlfriends and boyfriends with SMS, Twitter tweet or Facebook message, you should not be loyal to those who were not loyal to you too in the first place.
      You should not hire such person, nor promote such person. Unless people learn to honor others and being loyal to others, they are bad people.
         

    9. Re:Tacos for dinner by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      That's uhm... quite nuts, to be honest.

      If you have some theory that not having loyalty in a particular situation somehow strips all your morals and ethics then go ahead and make that case. Just asserting it at the start isn't good enough.

      If loyalty is one moral value that you treasure, lacking it or having a different view of it does not need to change any other morals, like honesty and compassion.

      Actually I think it is obvious that if you have deep compassion, loyalty is at odds with morals. You can do the right thing each time because it is the right thing, without regard to who the players are. But if forced to make a choice and you choose based on the player, you might be giving up a lot of other morals if it means harm to the person you otherwise would think morality favored.

    10. Re:Tacos for dinner by s73v3r · · Score: 1

      If the only reason they can't match the salary is because they can't afford it, they might be willing to offer alternatives in order to get you to stay.

    11. Re:Tacos for dinner by s73v3r · · Score: 1

      Hiring and promotions should not be based on loyalty, but on their ability to do the job. I, for one, think that most workplaces would be far better if they dropped this whole "We're a family!" bullshit, and embraced the idea that their employees are probably not going to stay there forever. Realize that your employees will eventually leave, and you'll probably be far better in planning, and won't be as disrupted when they do leave. Furthermore, they will probably be far more proactive in making sure their things are ready for someone else to pick up.

    12. Re:Tacos for dinner by ILongForDarkness · · Score: 1

      I let my last employer know and it worked out okay. That said it was a 5 person startup so we knew everyone pretty good and I'd just started 4 months or so prior. Anyways they countered with a 25% raise and a point of stock options. That said cost of leaving still made the other job more desirable but still they did try hard to keep me. I don't agree with other people that if people bring up money than they have other problems with the work. People always have other problems with the work it is after all called work. You are inconvenienced to get to work, they often inconvenience you by telling you what kinds of cloths you can where, the travel time etc. The pay is what you get as compensation for the hassle of working. So if the work is boring I need more money, if the work requires me to travel 2 hrs a day I need to get paid for that time etc. Work and pay has to balance. I think it is silly when an employer will admit you are worth more but won't budge on either the work or the pay (both sides of the balance). It is just gravity that gets you out the door after that.

    13. Re:Tacos for dinner by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      I've been with three companies 10 or more years.
      People who moved made more money and had better skill sets.

      In every case, staying did not give me job security.
      In one case, staying did give me a small pension. That will be nice.

      Companies have NO LOYALTY to you. At ANY time the management who are your friends may be fired and a completely evil soulless person or someone who is actively against you may be promoted above you. New company- old company.

      How stable does the new company appear to be? Will they let you start with more vacation because you are senior?

      I've lived close to work twice in my life and it completely rocked.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    14. Re:Tacos for dinner by sleigher · · Score: 1

      Therefore, if you find yourself in a situation where you don't like the direction things are going, or decisions are frequently made where your input is ignored and it turns out you were right... the only logical choice is to leave.

      You are absolutely correct. I just updated my resume. Thank you...

      --
      All points of time and space are connected.
    15. Re:Tacos for dinner by himurabattousai · · Score: 1

      I agree, but I'll take it one step further.

      You've received a job offer for seven thousand pounds more than you are making right now for doing the same job. That is not just "come work for me" money. That is a sign that you have outgrown your current job. Recognizing that is important because your current employer probably already knows it. At this point, I see the only way of you keeping your current job is to not give any indication to your boss that you know you have outgrown your current job.

      If you go into your boss's office and ask for that kind of a raise, he will know that you're aware of the situation. Once that happens, your days are numbered. Remember that this is a company that is already outsourcing its positions. They have shown where their loyalties lie, and it's not with their employees. It's with money.

      It sounds like the new opportunity has a lot to offer that you can't get where you are now. Investigate and if it's really all it seems to be, go for it. If your relationship with your co-workers is what you believe it to be, then they'll support you.

      --
      "osake no hou ga, biiru yori ii" to omotteiru.
    16. Re:Tacos for dinner by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      Good luck. I would rather have heard from someone who can provide evidence for the contrary: An environment where healthy discussion and disagreement are welcomed and consensus can be built among reasonable people with differing views and opinions that takes into account the short-term, the long-term and every other important consideration, rather than just fiat from on high regardless of what actually makes sense.

      Any organization absolutely needs a leader who makes the final decision, but unless that leader is also the biggest and most experienced expert in every field in which he is making decisions, which is virtually impossible, he'd better be listening to everyone who is, and making informed decisions without regard to ego, CYA, short-term gains at the expense of all else, unbridled self-interest and all the other deep vices that pass for "management" in too many organizations (especially big corporations and the government) these days.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
  2. What would Ayn Rand do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Take the new job and laugh all the way to the bank. Seriously, just give them notice, and take the new job.

    1. Re:What would Ayn Rand do? by mcmonkey · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Take the new job and laugh all the way to the bank. Seriously, just give them notice, and take the new job.

      I agree with the idea of "WWARD?" but I don't think you understand what Ayn Rand would do.

      What is the risk of that extra £7k? One thing Rand understood was TANSTAAFL. A £7k raise isn't a good move if the new company goes out of business in 6 months. Or if you're trading in a 10 minutes commute for 90 minutes in traffic.

      But more money from a company closer to home with no discernible difference in company stability or advancement potential? Why is this a question? Is there some other factor?

      Are you going from Puppies and Rainbows, LLC to Fire & Brimstone, Inc?

      Working with friends is nice. Changing jobs doesn't mean they aren't your friends anymore. You do (or should) have a life outside of work. If they're 'work friends' you only see during the day, they'll be replaced by new work friends at the new job.

      As for your friends in management, they aren't. I've known plenty of people (and been one of those people) screwed by management they previously thought of as friends. The higher up the friends were, the bigger the screwing.

      On the other hand, I've never heard of someone not affected by lay-offs or other company action due to protection from friends. I've seen it happen due to good managers looking out for their employees, but never due to friends.

      So seriously, more money and much shorter commute? No diggity, no doubt.

    2. Re:What would Ayn Rand do? by magarity · · Score: 1

      Well, if the other company is "much bigger" and hiring (plus paying more) in the current economy, I don't see any signs that it is a worse place to be in terms of future growth and advancement. If you're working in a company of 10 people, there's only so many layers of advancement compared to working in a company of 10,000.

      OTOH, he says they're getting to release a new product. We don't know what it could be. Was someone at Google or Facebook smart to leave when there were only 10 employees for a 10k employee company to go look for potential advancement?

    3. Re:What would Ayn Rand do? by dbIII · · Score: 1

      but I don't think you understand what Ayn Rand would do

      I know this one! She's pretend that instead of there only being the option of doing a job and not doing it that there is a third option of doing a job so badly that everyone would wish you never did it in the first place ("shrugged"). Then she would would live on welfare for a while until the royalties on books about abolishing welfare came in.
      Seriously, who cares what she would do when others put it all so much better long before? What does she bring to the table that Franklin, Paine et al didn't - apart from whining nihilism and an aristocratic style hate of the peasants of course.

  3. I don't think your hangup is loyalty... by CyberSnyder · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...it's the fear of the unknown. What if it's not as good as it looks? If you're making more money and gaining an hour and a half every day it's a no brainer.

    1. Re:I don't think your hangup is loyalty... by nschubach · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Agreed. I'm actually on my last day of my two weeks of notice (it's typical, gave me a little time to train my co-workers. If they can't pick it up, I wasn't being paid enough.)

      Give them plenty of notice, spend your last days passing on whatever knowledge you can to help (if you really care) and let them manage. If they really want to keep you aboard they may come back with a counter, but I think most companies understand that would be an awkward situation so they probably won't.

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    2. Re:I don't think your hangup is loyalty... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yeah, sometimes you just gotta do what's right for you, not what's right for the company you currently work for.

      You *could* try talking to your current manager about it too. Who knows, they may make you a counter-offer. Since they can't make up for the commute they may work out a deal where you can work virtual from home a couple days a week. Just be honest with them, and hopefully they'll appreciate that you put a lot of thought into the decision and didn't just jump at the first good offer to come along.

    3. Re:I don't think your hangup is loyalty... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Depends on the industry. If you leave a company like in a situation like that then there are two things that may happen. One is that the company really couldn't afford to lose you at that time, and goes bust. You'll then have a company that went bankrupt on your CV, which doesn't look great, especially if the next person hiring you knows why. The second is that your former manager may be friends with the next person you want to hire you, and lets them know that you left them in the lurch.

      Given the description in the summary, I would definitely take the job, but there are several ways of doing it. First, talk to both managers. See if you can get a bit more time before you move. Also see if the new company would be willing to subcontract you out to the old company for a day or two a month for the next year to ease the transition. This gives the new company some extra income and gives the old company the time to finish training your replacements.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    4. Re:I don't think your hangup is loyalty... by forestgomp · · Score: 5, Insightful

      ...it's the fear of the unknown. What if it's not as good as it looks? If you're making more money and gaining an hour and a half every day it's a no brainer.

      As my mother always said: "Never love anything that can't love you back." A company is a perfect example of this. And you're absolutely correct that fear of the unknown is a factor. That isn't necessarilly a bad thing -- because the new job might have unknown deficiencies (as well as benefits). Its a cost-benefit analysis without full information, rather than a no brainer:

      current job:
      negative aspects (less pay; long commute)
      positive aspects (friends, including among management)

      new job:
      negative aspects (no friends, others??)
      positive aspects (more pay, short commute, others??)

      The question is, do the known positives make up for the risk of the unknown negatives?

    5. Re:I don't think your hangup is loyalty... by dvoecks · · Score: 1

      Then again, I've seen people jump to a "better" job, only to be laid off 6 months later. Knowing that you like your situation and that it's stable is worth something, too. I'd probably talk to my employers and be frank about the situation. If you really are that tight, they'll either match the offer or wish you luck! If they're dinks about it, then the choice is certainly obvious.

    6. Re:I don't think your hangup is loyalty... by hedwards · · Score: 1

      One thing I learned from past experience is that you need to be aware of times when you're trying to avoid the past. You're not going to do it as it already happened and in all likelihood you're tilting things in favor of repeating a similar circumstance.

    7. Re:I don't think your hangup is loyalty... by hal2814 · · Score: 1

      I don't think Soulskill's hangup is loyalty or fear of the unknown. I think the primary hangup here is arrogance. How arrogant do you have to be to think the company just can't survive without you? Sure, it's tough to replace a senior developer but the company isn't just going to roll over and go tits up over it. They'll move on just like you will.

    8. Re:I don't think your hangup is loyalty... by Abstrackt · · Score: 1

      ...it's the fear of the unknown. What if it's not as good as it looks? If you're making more money and gaining an hour and a half every day it's a no brainer.

      Or maybe he is being loyal. Doesn't have to be fear from the unknown. You are making an assumption of how this person really is. It might be fear to you, but then you don't really feel like you need to be loyal to your employer.

      You have to be loyal to yourself first, acting in a way that lets you sleep at night. Ultimately it doesn't matter what the company thinks of you, what matters is what you think of yourself. If this individual isn't afraid of what's in front of them why are they asking the Internet at large to help make their decision? It seems to me that either the decision was already made before the question was asked. Take the new offer, put in your notice, train the hell out of your replacement and leave with a smile.

      --
      They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett
    9. Re:I don't think your hangup is loyalty... by FTWinston · · Score: 1

      The OP is senior out of 3 developers. If that's not can't-survive-without-you, how low do the numbers have to go? If OP was the only developer, would you still say that the company would be fine without them? Don't be too quick to blame on arrogance what can be adequately explained by guilt.

    10. Re:I don't think your hangup is loyalty... by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      There is no safe place.

      I've seen people stay and get laid off 6 months later.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    11. Re:I don't think your hangup is loyalty... by mcmonkey · · Score: 1

      The OP is senior out of 3 developers. If that's not can't-survive-without-you, how low do the numbers have to go? If OP was the only developer, would you still say that the company would be fine without them? Don't be too quick to blame on arrogance what can be adequately explained by guilt.

      MS goes on without Gates; Apple goes on without Jobs. Think the OP is more central to his company than those guys were to theirs?

      Even the solo dev can be replaced. And if you've done such a poor job of documentation that replacing you would be onerous, then you should feel guilty.

    12. Re:I don't think your hangup is loyalty... by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      If OP was the only developer, would you still say that the company would be fine without them?.

      Yes, indeed! If not, then management is totally incompetent and loyalty to them will not pay dividends.

      I've taken over multiple projects that had previously had a single developer who since moved on. In some of those cases, they moved on with good reason, and I did too. In others, it was a good project and having them already gone only cost me a few days of reading their code to get up to speed.

    13. Re:I don't think your hangup is loyalty... by Homr+Zodyssey · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I disagree that it looks bad on your resume to have left a company that then went bust. If a company goes bust because of a single employee leaving, then they are poorly managed. If you left shortly before they went bust, that shows you have a good head on your shoulders and were able to sense that the company was heading down.

    14. Re:I don't think your hangup is loyalty... by dvoecks · · Score: 1

      Fair enough, but It's easier to judge stability from within.

    15. Re:I don't think your hangup is loyalty... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      The problem with accepting a counter offer is that the threat of leaving for more money will always be hanging around you. If they give you an extra 7K you are unlikely to get a significant increase the following year, and they will be looking to find a replacement and get you to train them anyway. Once that person is in place and earning what you used to you may well find yourself being made redundant, or even worse forced out.

      Your skills are obviously in demand so even if this new job turns out to be terrible you can probably move on within a year or two tops. For an extra 7K and more personal time thanks to the reduced commute it is almost a no-brainer. The other company clearly wants you, so unlike most new jobs you won't be in a position of having to prove yourself, and in fact if it is a senior role they will probably be looking to you for direction and leadership.

      Don't let your current company get away with underpaying you just because you have lots of friends there. You have to think about your future and your family life.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    16. Re:I don't think your hangup is loyalty... by Surt · · Score: 1

      The OP is senior out of 3 developers. If that's not can't-survive-without-you, how low do the numbers have to go? If OP was the only developer, would you still say that the company would be fine without them? Don't be too quick to blame on arrogance what can be adequately explained by guilt.

      MS goes on without Gates; Apple goes on without Jobs. Think the OP is more central to his company than those guys were to theirs?

      Even the solo dev can be replaced. And if you've done such a poor job of documentation that replacing you would be onerous, then you should feel guilty.

      Yes, a company like Microsoft with (literally) a hundred executives ready and dying for the opportunity to step up into Gates' position is less reliant on Gates than a small company with 3 developers with no one ready to step up to fill the most senior developer's shoes.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    17. Re:I don't think your hangup is loyalty... by evil_aaronm · · Score: 1

      Yep. My last project was wonderful work - loved it - but the boss drove me nuts to the point where my right eye is now physically messed up and I need injections in the eye to manage it.

      I talked with a friend in another group about the situation and she said, "Why not work for me?" Her project isn't the same type of work - less dev, more "other stuff" - but I thought, "Yeah, I like working on my current project, but I'm not going to change my boss, ever, and I can't keep going like this. Today, my eye; tomorrow, who knows what." So I left my current group and now work for my friend. It's too soon to cast a vote on the actual work I'm doing, but I'm happier, otherwise.

    18. Re:I don't think your hangup is loyalty... by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      Smart employers don't counter. If you're willing to leave for money, you're willing to leave.

      Their question is 'how did that other company find you?'. Your protests that someone offered you as an option without your knowledge will fall on deaf ears, true or not.

      As an aside, for me, I would give notice, offer to do training off-hours at a fair but not cheap contractor rate, answer questions overnight or as time permits, and not look back. I still answer questions for past clients from +7 years ago, because you never know, and it doesn't take much time. None have asked me to take a half-hour call or log in and do work, so it's just goodwill.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    19. Re:I don't think your hangup is loyalty... by mcmonkey · · Score: 1

      Yes, a company like Microsoft with (literally) a hundred executives ready and dying for the opportunity to step up into Gates' position is less reliant on Gates than a small company with 3 developers with no one ready to step up to fill the most senior developer's shoes.

      Wasn't there a recent story about the paucity of developer jobs in Britain? Unless this is programming in a language invented by the OP, someone will be ready to step up to fill those shoes (just not necessarily one of the junior devs in the company).

      In the MS example, we don't know how many of those candidates have the ability to fill Gates' shoes, but you're right, there are likely 100s willing to try. And by some of the posts in the previous thread, there will be 100s queuing up to fill this spot.

      The OP may be very good at the job and offer many hundreds of LCOR (lines of code over replacement). But that's not the same as irreplaceable.

      This fun, since I'm in an argumentative mood, but we've really gotten off the track. If this dev is a single point of failure, that's a concern for the management, not the dev. It could be an opportunity--let me train others to do what I do, and make me their manager--or it could a sign it's time to move on.

      If there's 2 groups of 3 devs each, and each group contains a senior dev who is irreplaceable, what happens when 1 senior dev is unavailable? In an ideal world, the 2 junior devs step up to fill the gap until a 3rd dev can be worked in to the group. But in this scenario is sounds like the 1 remaining senior dev becomes irreplaceable to 2 groups. Such a dev can forget any promotions, vacations will be tough to schedule, etc.

      It's a sort of job security, but even in tough times, is it the security of a warm coat in the winter or the security of a straight jacket? If you a C-level executive and you're irreplaceable, that's good (for you). If you're a worker bee and you're irreplaceable, that's bad. All the more reason to move on.

    20. Re:I don't think your hangup is loyalty... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2

      Wait, you're expecting people making hiring decisions to be rational?

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    21. Re:I don't think your hangup is loyalty... by sonicmerlin · · Score: 1

      This is why cows are so loveable!

    22. Re:I don't think your hangup is loyalty... by gutnor · · Score: 1

      One is that the company really couldn't afford to lose you at that time, and goes bust.

      If the whole business of the company is critically dependent on that guy only, and management still decide to pay him less than market rate, it is their failure, not his : the company is one broken bone away from bankruptcy. Besides, there are plenty of tool that management has in its power to reward identified critical individual and make them feel like they belong. Even if they are short in cash, they could still make him a partner, promote him, give him stock, a big office, offer remote working several day a week, ...

      If you don't get any extra tangible consideration, you are not critical in management eyes.

      Also you get the benefits as soon as you become critical. It does not come after the facts: either management continues to not realise, or in the best case for them, they eventually realise they dodged a bullet and promptly solve the issue (i.e. finding a way to make you less critical)

      Faced with impending doom, management can be very creative. If they know you are critical, they will make the kind of counteroffer you cannot refuse (i.e. much more than just match your offer) If you don't get that when leaving, you can take the other offer with peace of mind: either management screwed up or you simply were not critical.

    23. Re:I don't think your hangup is loyalty... by drolli · · Score: 1

      Yes. That is why it would be important not to put too much value on the money when discussing with them. Unless you want to ruin you reputation, exhibit a positive, productive and professional style of work:

      -Dont leave or threaten in the middle of an important task, but make it clear you see it as your responsibility and that you want to complete it. Doing otherwise could sound like blackmail to your boss.Or to formulate it in terms of being loyal: it means you are loyal to your current project

      -If you want to leave, put other things (commuting time etc) than money in the center, because ultimately people seldom leave due to money. If you value a 10% pay rise more than a cut of the commuting time by 1 hour per day it says much about your personality.

  4. Ask yourself ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Ask yourself what they'd do if somebody came along and offered to do your job for 7 grand less.

  5. Does your company have loyalty to you? by gbrandt · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You have to remember that your company has no loyalty to you. If their revenues drop and they have to save money, your job will be on the line!

    Always do whats best for you and yours (family).

    1. Re:Does your company have loyalty to you? by mla_anderson · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That's not always true. I worked for a small company through some of the worst times that industry experienced. Our sales went below 50% of previous years and our net income went negative. Instead of laying people off the managers took cuts. When things got a little better, the managers went without raises so the rest of us could have small raises and larger bonuses (bonuses are cheaper in the long run). I would have never left if I didn't want to leave that part of the country.

      --
      Sig is on vacation
    2. Re:Does your company have loyalty to you? by who_stole_my_kidneys · · Score: 1

      If the company is privately held you it may be more beneficial to stay. However if its a publicly traded company, there is no loyalty, you as a person are a commodity to be traded, you better get the best price for your skills.

    3. Re:Does your company have loyalty to you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      the company has proven its lack of loyalty by outsourcing a lot of the work. I would take the new gig and the unknowns, rather than stick around for a company with a history of outsourcing. You could be the next outsourced victim.

    4. Re:Does your company have loyalty to you? by chispito · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You have to remember that your company has no loyalty to you.

      He works for a small company, and that's not always the case.

      --
      The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
    5. Re:Does your company have loyalty to you? by delinear · · Score: 1

      It's not always true of course, but your situation is the tiny exception to the massive norm - and even then, do you think they were being wholly altrusitic, or just realised that if they wanted to turn things around they needed their experienced employees on board?

    6. Re:Does your company have loyalty to you? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2

      That depends on the company. During the recession in the '80s, the managers at my father's company were the first to take pay cuts. When they were still making a loss, they gave the employees a choice of shifting to part time, taking a pay cut, or having some redundancies. The employees opted for a mixture of the first two. When the economy recovered, there were bonuses for the people who'd stayed and the old pay rates were reinstated, with the management pay rate being the last to return to its pre-recession value.

      If you're certain that the company that you work for wouldn't do something like this in times of financial difficulty, then maybe you should consider moving elsewhere now, rather than when they get someone cheaper to do your job...

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    7. Re:Does your company have loyalty to you? by moderatorrater · · Score: 1

      I disagree. Yes, clearly the company will cut your job if they need to the same way that you might leave your job if you need to. However, some companies will go out of their way to treat you well and with respect. These types of companies deserve your loyalty.

      Not all companies are this way and not all teams are this way, but there are companies worth being loyal to.

    8. Re:Does your company have loyalty to you? by pr0nbot · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I too am a senior developer for a small UK company. For me it is most definitely not the case - our company is run more like a cooperative, with profit sharing etc. However the OP mentions that work has been outsourced; I think this says everything he needs to know about his company's loyalty towards staff (i.e. cheap employee trumps loyal employee).

    9. Re:Does your company have loyalty to you? by FreakyGreenLeaky · · Score: 2

      /me takes off employer hat
      Correct - his priority should be his family, it would be mine. He'd be a fool to turn down the other gig.

      /me puts employer hat back on
      It sucks crusty pustule arse when someone you have invested in and someone you have proven your loyalty to, and befriended, picks up and leaves. But hey, that's the way it works - you get over it. Ultimately, the best performing company is one which acts aggressively, ruthlessly and decisively, much like a psychopath would - no feelings, pure need and logic (hence the comment by someone else that you shouldn't feel too much for a company because when it comes down to it, you will be fired if the need arises) - a company is, after all, not a person. It's a business. If it's not turning a profit, it's dying.

      However, a company is still run by people who can hold grudges: Give *plenty* of notice. Two weeks is not enough, irrespective of local laws. It's all about being decent and respectful (you are after all, not a psychopath :). If you resign correctly and do all that you can to train your replacement, they (management) will respect you for it, no matter how much it stings that you are leaving them. Do *not* burn your bridges by giving the bare minimum notice, and playing solitaire (how nineties of me, you kids do facebook all fucking day) to kill time. That shit will ultimately come back to haunt you when future employers/agencies contact them for a reference.

    10. Re:Does your company have loyalty to you? by FTWinston · · Score: 1

      the company has proven its lack of loyalty by outsourcing a lot of the work. I would take the new gig and the unknowns, rather than stick around for a company with a history of outsourcing. You could be the next outsourced victim.

      So they had a deadline looming, and a very limited number of developers - what if the outsourcing was done with the intention of helping the developers by reducing their workload, so as to require less overtime? If anything, the outsourcing could be an indication of (possibly poorly-enacted) loyalty, by the company, to its developers.

    11. Re:Does your company have loyalty to you? by thsths · · Score: 1

      > You have to remember that your company has no loyalty to you.

      It really depends. I would say that most companies probably have less loyalty for you than you might think, but I only say that because I have also seen a few companies that genuinely care for their employees. The difference is like night and day. Think about it, and if you are honest, you will know on which side you are. The decision to stay or leave should follow logically.

    12. Re:Does your company have loyalty to you? by julesh · · Score: 1

      Outsourcing isn't always about cheapness. There are plenty of other reasons to prefer outsourcing to hiring an internal staff member.

      - Temporary requirement. If you only have a short term project, then it often isn't worth going to the effort & expense of hiring someone.
      - Speed. You can get an outsourcing provider working on your project next day, if you want. Hiring new developers to do the same work internally is going to take weeks at a minimum, probably at least a month.
      - Resources. If hiring a new employee means relocating to a larger office, you'll need a damned good reason to do so rather than outsourcing.
      - Convenience. True story: a few years back I did some consulting at a place that had outsourced their QA to India. This was more convenient than working with local QA, because when they shut up shop for the evening, they'd just upload the latest version of the software and documentation to the QA team, who'd pick it up a few hours later, and would have the testing report sent back and bugs filed by 9am London time the next morning.

    13. Re:Does your company have loyalty to you? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1
      As I said, it was a recession. The company was doing badly because the set of people who could afford their services had shrunk. It had three choices:
      • Keep employing people at the current rate, use up its cash reserves, and file for bankruptcy
      • Fire some employees
      • Institute pay cuts

      Option 1 is clearly a bad idea. Option 2 was possible, but the company wasn't doing badly because of underperforming employees, it was doing badly because the economy was crap. Given the state of the economy, employees who were made redundant would have had a hard time finding work - not because they were bad, but because no one was hiring.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    14. Re:Does your company have loyalty to you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I slaved for years, was loyal, turned down offers and then I was turfed.

      Employment is slavery, look for ownership.

    15. Re:Does your company have loyalty to you? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Outsourced could just mean they got some contractors in to write a specific bit of software. My company has done that in past because they didn't have anyone with the particular skills they needed and because it was only a one-off project it wasn't worth taking someone on long-term. I don't see anything wrong with that, and in fact once the software was written people at the company were able to learn from it and maintain it, eventually evolving it into new products and taking people on (including me) to work on them.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    16. Re:Does your company have loyalty to you? by TempeTerra · · Score: 1

      Sometimes work is outsourced, particularly in small companies, because for this project they need 8 programmers but only employ four.

      --
      .evom ton seod gis eht
    17. Re:Does your company have loyalty to you? by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      And your attitude is the prevalent one, which is why so many companies have no problem treating their employees like interchangeable cog wheels. Not everyone considers the "Net Pay" line item on his pay stub to be the end all and be all of workplace concerns.

    18. Re:Does your company have loyalty to you? by darkwing_bmf · · Score: 1

      they killed 2/3rds of their workforce overnight

      That's horrible! Where were you working, Somalia?

    19. Re:Does your company have loyalty to you? by msobkow · · Score: 1

      While a smaller company with close interpersonal relationships might hold on to you a little longer during a downturn, there is no escaping economic reality. No friendship can override "No money."

      --
      I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
    20. Re:Does your company have loyalty to you? by radtea · · Score: 1

      You have to remember that your company has no loyalty to you.

      This is 100% true 95% of the time. If he's in the other 5% (or less) it may be worth staying for the intangibles, which will include a greater degree of employment security than he would get elsewhere.

      But the first-order answer to the question, "Should I be loyal to the company?" is a resounding NO.

      The second-order answer is, "It depends."

      --
      Blasphemy is a human right. Blasphemophobia kills.
    21. Re:Does your company have loyalty to you? by RogerWilco · · Score: 1

      You have to remember that your company has no loyalty to you.

      He works for a small company, and that's not always the case.

      Agreed. My first employer was about 20 people, and the boss really cared. Almost made him go bust, because he kept employees that he could not afford after the .com bubble burst.

      --
      RogerWilco the Adventurous Janitor
    22. Re:Does your company have loyalty to you? by King_TJ · · Score: 1

      Exactly! I work for a small company right now, and despite the place having 2 rounds of layoffs and shutting down 2 of 4 divisions due to the poor economy, I still have a job. Why? In no small part because they know I care enough about the I.T. infrastructure and their financial situation to make the effort to constantly improve things. The network admins who worked here before me clearly took an attitude of, "I don't get paid as well as bigger places would pay me, so screw this... I'm just going to do the bare minimum to keep things running each day." I found stacks and stacks of paperwork in my desk drawers, when I started here, of invoices and printed emails detailing numerous situations where they chose to call in an outside consulting firm to fix issues, rather than fixing things themselves. I still use the outside guys occasionally, but I've literally cut our annuals expenditure on them in half since I've been here and got a handle on all the hardware and software.

      It may be a while before things are back to "normal" for this company, but I think we made it through the worst of it and their monthly sales have improved in recent months. It's easy to say, "Always do what's best for YOU (and your family by extension).", but what does that really mean? How do I know what's really "best"? I know a stable paycheck is a GOOD thing and it's less stressful than not being sure if you're going to have the money to pay monthly bills on time that come in on a fixed schedule. I know I'd rather work for a place that appreciates my effort than one that doesn't really notice I exist, except as another "line item" in some of their spreadsheets.

      I'm not going to walk around with my eyes closed... so sure, if I run across a job opening someplace that sounds good and they pay is a lot better, I apply. But in this economic situation, that rarely even leads to a callback anyway. It's definitely true that in smaller firms, each employee is counted on more than in bigger places. If you're out sick or on vacation, some major aspect of the business basically stops until you return, or gets handled poorly by someone trying to step in and do a job they're not familiar with .... That has value and means they SHOULD have some level of loyalty to you. It's always a question of how much that's worth though, I guess.

    23. Re:Does your company have loyalty to you? by Zontar_Thing_From_Ve · · Score: 1

      You have to remember that your company has no loyalty to you.

      He works for a small company, and that's not always the case.

      Good intentions only go so far, even with small companies. Cases in point.
      1) My current employer is a Fortune 500 company. A few years ago they bought out the company I was working for. Roughly 10 or 11 years ago, before I was working here, the company was a smallish start up. They had some money issues and they made some rather savage layoffs to save money. Sure they felt bad about it, I truly believe that, but folks were still shown the door.
      2) We lost a good handful of experienced employees to a start up in the past year. The start up seemed great - at first. Then the owners decided to sell the company and they did a massive layoff to get costs down. Almost everybody they hired from my current employer was shown the door. They even told one person who had just worked their last day with us on a Friday and was going to start for them on Monday "Uh, don't bother coming in because you don't have a job here anymore." By the way, that person was not rehired by my company just because the new company laid them off over the weekend before the new job actually started.

      I'm sure that some companies really do care, but the minute it's cheaper to lose you than keep you, you're gone. That's the reality of it.

    24. Re:Does your company have loyalty to you? by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      This isn't always true. Small companies can be disloyal to companies too. Especially if it's a startup funded by venture capital strangers who may one day just say "cut 20% of the workforce now". The people you work for however may have loyalty, even if their hands are tied.

      Even family businesses have problems in this regard.

    25. Re:Does your company have loyalty to you? by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      You know, if the managers like you, they might even ask you to recommend someone to replace you. Happened at my last job, and I was able to get a friend a nice pay increase.

    26. Re:Does your company have loyalty to you? by bcrowell · · Score: 1

      You have to remember that your company has no loyalty to you.

      Yep. The OP describes this as a company that outsourced the coding of their "flagship project" to incompetent developers, and is now not willing to pay enough to hire people in-house with the level of experience and skills needed to clean up the mess. This kind of corporate behavior is the opposite of showing loyalty to the company's employees. It's not the OP's fault that they're dependent on him. They're dependent on him because they're treating labor as a commodity that they want to save money on.

    27. Re:Does your company have loyalty to you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Not necessarily. I've seen it go both ways so you may be correct about his company. On the other hand, outsourcing can be useful to handle temporary staffing needs while protecting existing employees. I've used outsourcing to avoid hiring people that I would probably have to lay off when a big project ends. I only hire people when I'm confident I can continue to pay them.

      However, your basic point is solid. Does the company have loyalty to you. You need to look at how the company operates and how have they treated other employees. For example, when a good employee has trouble and needs time off to deal with life, family, etc. Is the company supportive or do they kick him to the curb. Will the company go the extra mile to stick with an employee that's struggling but really trying to improve. These are the real tests.

      Since it sounds like he just completed a successful project. I would recommend he ask for a promotion and raise BUT NOT mention the other offer. If the employer cannot afford the raise they can at least give the promotion and promise the raise at a later date. If he gets neither, then perhaps he isn't as valuable to the company as he thinks and it might be better to move on.

    28. Re:Does your company have loyalty to you? by jcfandino · · Score: 1

      They've done it!
      They made you feel indispensable. You're not, no one is.

    29. Re:Does your company have loyalty to you? by FreakyGreenLeaky · · Score: 1

      Exactly - peer referral is often very effective.

    30. Re:Does your company have loyalty to you? by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      So, all of those are good reasons that outsourcing CAN be better. They were all talked about by consultants/managers/etc publicly when it was implemented where I work.

      However, I was close enough to management to find out that basically it came down to cost. Nobody really cared if service improved so much that budgets were decreased.

      There are also downsides - turnover being a very big one. You're not investing in people, and you have no reason to believe that the outsource partner is either, or their idea of investment might not mean keeping a dedicated person working on things important to you.

      I think the biggest driver of outsourcing is management that just doesn't want to have to get their hands dirty. You can write a check every month and dump your problems on somebody else, and as long as you have someplace to point your finger when things go south you're fine.

    31. Re:Does your company have loyalty to you? by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      what if the outsourcing was done with the intention of helping the developers by reducing their workload
      Then it would have backfired, because you can't train up a bunch of people who know nothing about the project and make them useful faster than just doing it yourself.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    32. Re:Does your company have loyalty to you? by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      And your attitude is the prevalent one, which is why so many companies have no problem treating their employees like interchangeable cog wheels.
      Oops, you seem to have gotten your statement backwards.Here let me help you:
      And your attitude is the prevalent one, because so many companies have no problem treating their employees like interchangeable cog wheels.
      All better.
      Remember, hundreds of millions of loyal employees were left hanging out to dry when their promised pensions and retirement benefits were cut or removed altogether. They had accepted lower pay all along in exchange for a healthy retirement, but it turns out all along they should have taken a higher paying job with no retirement benefits and invested the money themselves. The same is true with Social Security. Between you and your employer, you probably sock away $500 a month to the government, and in return, in 40 years, they will give you back $300 a month, which will be worth about $30 a month in Present Value terms.
      If you invested it yourself, you should be able to pull out close to ten thousand a month, even when present value is figured.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    33. Re:Does your company have loyalty to you? by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      No, I didn't get my statement wrong, so you didn't fix anything. My statement stands as people like the poster I was replying to go all the way up to the top.

    34. Re:Does your company have loyalty to you? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Which is a good reason to try to avoid working for them at all. If companies that don't show any loyalty to their staff find it difficult to recruit competent employees, then that gives them an incentive to change. Otherwise you end up with a feedback cycle where employers and employees both treat each other worse and worse, because they expect the other to screw them over sooner or later.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  6. Why not use it as a bargaining chip? by ByOhTek · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Ask for a raise, see if you get it.

    Loyalty is a consideration - but first comes paying the bills. Are you happy and satisfied with where you work, and your style of living? Would the 7k increase be worth it for you, to switch, and leave them where they are? Company is about risks and resources, if they don't manage their resources and take a risk at loosing something that is important and even key to what they are doing, it is their problem, not yours.

    --
    Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
    1. Re:Why not use it as a bargaining chip? by snowraver1 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'd have to say, I'd confront my current employer, let them know about the offer, and give them a chance to keep me. They would have to take into account the commute too, so a 10k raise would be in order. If you really are needed, you'll get the money, otherwise enjoy the new job guilt free!

      --
      Copyright 2010. All rights reserved. This comment may not be copied in any way including, but not limited to caching.
    2. Re:Why not use it as a bargaining chip? by ShadyG · · Score: 2

      I personally would not use the new job as a "bargaining chip", in that I'd bring it to the old boss and try to get them to match or beat the deal. IMO that has the potential to create bad blood. Instead, without ever mentioning any other opportunity I would just ask to open up negotiations for a raise. Focus on what your value to the company is and has been. You're training a couple of junior developers, so why not ask for a manager position with those two your first direct reports? No doubt such a position has additional responsibilities commensurate with the raise you're seeking. It will also reflect better on your resume when you do eventually seek out another position.

      If you and they cannot agree on an acceptable solution, then you should definitely not feel bad about jumping ship. It may very well be that your actual value to the new company is simply more than it is to the old. Everyone wants to be valuable, and maybe this new company can better utilize your skills and experience. Their offer appears to indicate at least they think so.

    3. Re:Why not use it as a bargaining chip? by endikos · · Score: 1

      Yup. Give them an opportunity to make up the difference if you're more inclined to stay if the pay were right. If that doesnt work or if you'd rather leave anyway, give generous notice (I gave my last employer 4 weeks instead of the customary 2), and even offer to be available on a consultancy basis a few hours a week to help them through the transition. That'll also give you a bit of a further bonus in your pocketbook if they choose to do that.

    4. Re:Why not use it as a bargaining chip? by sfled · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I was in a similar situation, and that's exactly what I did. A job opened up closer to my home and on-target with my then new-found interest in web development. I told my old boss that I would be leaving in two weeks, and that I was saddened but explained the circumstances: better pay, less commute, more job satisfaction. He responded by asking how much they were offering. He then matched the salary, told me he would pay for my time commuting, and asked me to use some of my time to develop a web site for the company. Win-win boss. Disclaimer: I did eventually leave years later to form my own company. We're still friends and he's a customer, so yeah, he's still in some ways my boss :)

      --
      I'm not really a web designer, I just play one on the Internet.
    5. Re:Why not use it as a bargaining chip? by martyros · · Score: 2

      Ask for a raise, see if you get it.

      It's often a lot easier to get a raise with a competing offer in hand -- if you like the company where you work and the people, that's what I'd do first -- ask for an $8k raise.

      Loyalty is a consideration

      The thing is, even if your first-level manager is loyal to you, the company as a whole isn't. What happens if there's a strategic shift in 6 months and they decide to shut down your department, or completely reorganize things so you're no longer doing what you want anymore? You're now either looking for a job, or stuck with a job you don't like, as well as a lower salary, thinking about that job that you turned down and is no longer available.

      --

      TCP: Why the Internet is full of SYN.

    6. Re:Why not use it as a bargaining chip? by Necroman · · Score: 1

      My old company trained their managers that they were not allowed to do anything if their employees came to them saying they had offers from another company.

      They didn't pay well and were bad at keeping talented people. Hurray for having a new job!

      --
      Its not what it is, its something else.
    7. Re:Why not use it as a bargaining chip? by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

      "Loyalty is a consideration - but first comes paying the bills."

      He is not starving to death.
      That is like a Christian saying that charity starts at home (when charity is supposed to be major tenant of their faith).

      If loyalty is important then you cannot put it above and beyond everything in your life, say what you mean which is obviously: "loyalty is all well and good, as long as it does not inconvenience you in the slightest"

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    8. Re:Why not use it as a bargaining chip? by cs668 · · Score: 2

      I would ask my employer for a raise - explain why you are worth it and see what happens. I would not tell them about the other offer, ever. They won't view your asking for a raise in the same way if they know about the other offer and they will not trust you in the same way again. Particularly if it is a tight nit group the way you described it.

    9. Re:Why not use it as a bargaining chip? by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      Of course, the other problem is that they may also be thinking that the two people he's training can eventually do his job plus more work, for less money.

      They've already shown how they think by outsourcing a lot of the stuff, and then expecting them to "fix" it.

      So, he's probably training his future replacements anyway, and will be looking for a new job soon. Having seen how this sort of thing plays out before, I'd say take the new job ASAP, because you're gonna be a gonner.

    10. Re:Why not use it as a bargaining chip? by Khopesh · · Score: 1

      I'm replying to the one positive post I see in order to deliver another positive post that includes similar topics.

      Yes, loyalty matters. Be frank about the situation with both sides, see how much the new employer wants you by asking how flexible they are in your start date (showing loyalty to your current employer should demonstrate to the future employer that this will translate to loyalty to them, so this actually helps). With the current company, tell them about the offer and that you have asked to postpone it (there's nothing wrong with giving a very large amount of time when you leave notice, but always leave the door open with your current boss before accepting an outside offer). Tell them about the pay increase and the shorter commute; in a capitalist economy, they have to compete with it or otherwise lose you.

      These steps are all important because they win you brownie points even if your mind is made up on going to the new company; you made an effort to do what was best and leave on good terms with your current employer -- this is extremely important because you need to retain good contacts there and a good impression or else you'll be hurting when you need the job after this new one, and the value of your social network (the work kind, not facebook/linkedin) is one of your biggest assets, even when not job-hunting.

      --
      Use my userscript to add story images to Slashdot. There's no going back.
    11. Re:Why not use it as a bargaining chip? by sconeu · · Score: 1

      This.

      If I'm point man on a project, and I get a job offer that is too good to turn down, I tell the new employer that I need to see a job through (or train a replacement) because my current employer doesn't deserve to be left in the lurch.

      Most new employers see that as a positive. I tell the old boss that I've accepted the new position, but I will see the project through (or train replacement). Again, a positive. No burnt bridges.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    12. Re:Why not use it as a bargaining chip? by PoolOfThought · · Score: 1

      I completely agree with cs668. If you ask for a raise and explain why you think you are worth it then you'll get honest feedback. If they give you the raise it's because they agreed that you are infact worth it. If they don't, they'll probably tell you why they don't agree or why they cannot give you the raise. Either way this will give you even more information on which to make you decision.

      If you just tell them about the offer and ask them to match it or beat it then you are going to put them in a defensive position and they might not respond well. Or, they might respond well for just long enough for you to train up the two new devs. Once they're not in a bind anymore they'll remember the position you put them in and it may come back to haunt you. They might not fire you, but you might find yourself.... uncomfortable... and wishing you'd taken the new offer anyway.

      You don't have to use the offer as leverage with the old company. Instead you can see it as a safety net for your negotiating with the old company. They don't have to know the safety net is there for you use it to your advantage.

      --
      My present is the activity I am currently engaged in with the purpose of turning the future into a better past.
    13. Re:Why not use it as a bargaining chip? by jmv · · Score: 1

      I would recommend against using this for bargaining. Someone else suggested asking for a raise *without* mentioning the new job and I think it's OK. But actually saying "give he a raise or I'll go to company X" is likely to be seen as a form of blackmail, especially if your company's currently in a rush to finish a product. Also, I've heard of people using that strategy actually getting a raise... before being laid off as soon as the company was out of its rush.

    14. Re:Why not use it as a bargaining chip? by HornWumpus · · Score: 3, Funny

      When I was in this situation I didn't tell them of the offer directly.

      I talked to the office snitch (who thought I wasn't on to her) and mentioned 'in confidence' that I as 99.9% out the door, just finished the 3rd interview at the new place.

      Two days later they made me an offer better then the new place. By not telling them exactly what the other place was offering they had to guess.

      Then again you may not be as vital as you think. The nice thing about this is you don't tip your hand.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    15. Re:Why not use it as a bargaining chip? by xxdelxx · · Score: 1

      Just finished that myself. 6 weeks into the new job. Gave the old boss 'informal' 4 weeks advance notice of the formal 2 weeks so that we could transition everything neatly. Not that the megacorp that I left gave a shit, in fact they're probably pleased because I cost a *lot* more than the Indians/Chinese/[select low cost location] people that they'll eventually replace me with, but making life easier for a boss that really did try despite the crap handed down from on high didn't cost me anything. The destination company were fully at ease with that stance as well. Also means I can be a lot more relaxed about it - which is important to me. I'm just not enough of a bastard to screw people over for minor reasons. Probably explains why I have no interest in climbing a company career ladder,

    16. Re:Why not use it as a bargaining chip? by sgt101 · · Score: 2

      Worth saying that :

      1. If they don't match and give you compensation for the commute then it's a sure sign that they would get rid of you without a moments thought if they needed to.

      2. If they do match then it's a good bet that they will hang on to you in hard times.

      --
      --------------------------------------------- "In the end, we're all just water and old stars."
    17. Re:Why not use it as a bargaining chip? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Realistically his current company is unlikely to offer a 7K/year salary bump, and then there is the reduced commute too. Unfortunately the only way to get that kind of increase is to move somewhere else. In fact that is why people usually leave; their current salary stagnated and the gap between it and the market rate is enough to make it worth jumping ship.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    18. Re:Why not use it as a bargaining chip? by ILongForDarkness · · Score: 1

      Depends on the circumstances of the offer. My last job I was pretty friendly with management. I was only there for about 3 months and then I got a job offer from a place I applied to before them. The job made more sense to me as it was ~150km from my family versus 4k, pay was the same but cost of living about 40% less etc. Anyways there was no hard feelings and I consulted for them remotely for another 9 months part-time at 20% or so pay raise. I wasn't there to screw them over it just was a logical choice for me and they realized it. I'd say if you weren't actively looking around but had a recruiter come to you with an offer the same thing goes. A business considers what business they want to take on and similarly an employee has to consider his options for where to apply their work.

    19. Re:Why not use it as a bargaining chip? by cs668 · · Score: 1

      Sorry the parent post is mine, I just somehow wasn't logged in and didn't notice.

    20. Re:Why not use it as a bargaining chip? by Kjella · · Score: 1

      I would say it's highly unlikely the business would respond fast enough unless it's very clear to them that you are in immediate risk of disappearing, so it's easier to just come clean and say it. Otherwise they'll typically redirect you to the yearly round of raises or some review of the management structure, long after your other offer has expired. If they have any clue they will ask why now, why such a hurry and you will end up showing your hand anyway. If you don't they'll still feel played when they learn that you leave, why not be straight with what it'd take to make you stay? The only time it actually works well is if you get what you want just like that.

      Besides, sometimes unexpected things happen. I was switching jobs a couple years ago, I'd essentially made up my mind. But my current employer said "Isn't there anything we can do to keep you?" and I didn't want to say absolutely no way so I asked for a salary quite a lot higher than I'd been offered, thinking no way. Yes way, they matched and raised. Sadly for them the new job also upped their offer so it didn't work, but I got a completely unexpected - but very welcome - pay raise.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    21. Re:Why not use it as a bargaining chip? by rastos1 · · Score: 1

      He then matched the salary

      That means that until that point he paid you less then you were worth to him? Hmm ....

    22. Re:Why not use it as a bargaining chip? by sfled · · Score: 1

      Note that boss asked me to incorporate web dev into my job - the raise was due more to added responsibilities. LOL, until that point boss was unaware that my web development abilities had become viable and marketable.

      --
      I'm not really a web designer, I just play one on the Internet.
  7. Take the damn job by jaundicebaby · · Score: 1

    Change is good and the commute alone should make your life better, increase in salary or not. Also, you will get to leave behind all the crap you used to do/support and start fresh. Do it!

  8. Go for it, AND be loyal by markdavis · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It sounds like a deal you shouldn't pass up. And I admire your loyalty. Your new employer will appreciate your loyalty, too, when you explain to them how you still need to help your old company out.

    I am sure they would accommodate your working with your old employer until they can get on their feet once again. Perhaps telecommute some, or work at the old job a few days a week.

    If they had objections to that, I would question wanting to work for them...

    1. Re:Go for it, AND be loyal by bames53 · · Score: 1

      ++

      This is an excellent answer.

    2. Re:Go for it, AND be loyal by Phillip+Birmingham · · Score: 1

      It sounds like a deal you shouldn't pass up. And I admire your loyalty. Your new employer will appreciate your loyalty, too, when you explain to them how you still need to help your old company out.

      I am sure they would accommodate your working with your old employer until they can get on their feet once again. Perhaps telecommute some, or work at the old job a few days a week.

      If they had objections to that, I would question wanting to work for them...

      I wish I had mod points so I could rate this Funny.

      On the off chance that you are serious, I suspect that the fraction of employers who would welcome such an arrangement is very low, especially if it were an open-ended arrangement. I imagine everybody would be much more comfortable if you start the new job later, and give extended notice at the old job.

      --
      Make me aerodynamic in the evening air
    3. Re:Go for it, AND be loyal by markdavis · · Score: 1

      * Not only am I serious, but I am guessing quite the opposite of your assumption.

      * I never said it was open-ended. There should be some type of understanding/arrangement.

      * I *am* an employer that hires people. I would be quite impressed with a candidate that wanted to make sure his previous employer were not left high and dry. And yes, I would certain work with the candidate to find some solution.

      * Sometimes prospective employers can't wait for "extended notice" to hire someone. They might be more than happy to make a few concessions to get the employee in a few weeks, rather than a few months.

    4. Re:Go for it, AND be loyal by Sarten-X · · Score: 1

      If I were in this situation, this is almost exactly how I'd handle it. I'd explain the offer to the old employer, explain how the commute is much better, and that the past few years were great. I'd then offer ,to answer any questions about the existing project via phone or email as time allows. Don't let it interfere with the new job, but I see no problem with dedicating some of the extra 90 minutes of personal time to keeping professional friends.

      --
      You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
    5. Re:Go for it, AND be loyal by tom229 · · Score: 2

      This.

      We actually just had this happen at my work place. The most senior guy that had been here since the company started got a better offer. He got offered large raises, stock options, etc, to stay but ultimately wanted to try something new.

      What ended up happening is he is now working for his new job, making more money, and he still consults for us at around $80 an hour.

      Ultimately you have to do what's best for you and you aren't betraying anybody by doing so. Your boss will figure out what to do and if he can't, his business would have never survived anyways.

      --
      If it ain't broke, don't fix it.
    6. Re:Go for it, AND be loyal by bzipitidoo · · Score: 1

      This shouldn't be a question of loyalty, but of professionalism on all sides. Nobody is irreplaceable. If he somehow is hard to replace, why is that? They keep him too busy with other work to document what any replacement would need to know? Many companies operate in this fashion, don't have a good answer to the "what if he's hit by a bus" question. If the best plan they have is hope an accident doesn't happen, and rely on "loyalty" to fend off better offers, they'll get hurt sooner or later. They're taking a chance. Business is all about risk management. Maybe they've calculated this risk, and decided to live with it, decided it would be too costly to mitigate? None of that is his fault. He's not responsible for such decisions. However, he should have been documenting all along, even without being explicitly asked, so that if he leaves his former employer can continue with someone else without undue difficulty.

      No decent system administrator would withhold passwords from former employers. The same principle applies to other sorts of knowledge. I know making documentation for your replacement goes against most people's instincts to preserve their position any way they can, but you don't know the future and it can really help in surprising ways. At one place where I did some contracting work, I tried to leave all kinds of documentation so they could do it themselves, and build on what I had done for them. 2 years later, they contracted with me again. They'd updated their database software to a new version, and this broke a few things. I found the documentation I'd left a real help so I could quickly pick up where I had left off. I sure didn't remember all the details so painfully discovered earlier. The person you end up helping down the road may be yourself.

      In short, he should take the better offer. "Better" is hard to assess, but in this case it sounds like moving on is the better bet. You can never know for sure what sort of management runs the new place. For that matter, you can work with someone for years and never really know them. If you've never seen how they handle a bad situation, you could be in for an ugly surprise. It's been said that employees join companies, and leave managers. Stay long enough to ease the transition, but don't stay out of a misguided sense of loyalty. They're professionals, or they should be.

      He might also consider offering his services to his old employer while he is working at his new job. Consult part time for them on the side.

      --
      Intellectual Property is a monopolistic, selfish, and defective concept. It is "tyranny over the mind of man"
    7. Re:Go for it, AND be loyal by Bucky24 · · Score: 1

      I suspect that the fraction of employers who would welcome such an arrangement is very low

      If I'm going to work for someone (especially if they asked me to come work for them) and they aren't willing to let me wrap up my current projects and train up a replacement then I don't want to work for them.

      --
      All the world's a CPU, and all the men and women merely AI agents
    8. Re:Go for it, AND be loyal by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      Be careful with such a deal.

      Once your employer knows you're leaving and once *you* know you're leaving, working at the old company is no where as much fun as it used be. First off, they start excluding you from important meetings (which makes sense since you will no longer be at the company). Then, they give your office space, your keys, your bathroom key card, your extension number, and your passwords to the person who is going to replace you (again, this totally makes sense, especially if you're just working part time at your new employer's and part time at your old employer). Then, suddenly everybody gets Friday off for having worked so hard the previous months, but you don't get anytime off, you're going to be leaving the company anyway.

      And of course at some point, the shit hits the fan, the guy replacing you tells them there is no way he'll be able to do your job when you're gone (something that almost everybody already knew, but had not articulated), so they panic and ask that you write down all the tacit knowledge you've accumulated within the last thirty years in excruciating details so that any monkey could understand. So the last couple of weeks of your work, you're no longer a senior developer anymore, you've become the trainer, troubleshooter, the temp, a documentation author, an historian, and an archeologist in charge of a documentation project that you know is going to fail.

      And last but not least, employers in desperate situations sometimes can sabotage the hiring process of their former employees, in the hope that their former employees will come back to them. That's why you should never tell your former employer and any of your former colleagues where you're going until well after you are safely entrenched at your new employer's company.

      And if you do "help" out your old company. Ask your new employer, that's right, but don't just help out of sheer obligation or guilt. Guilt is a lousy internal motivator. Charge them extremely high consulting fees. This way, if they do bring you back as a very expensive consultant, they're not going to waste your time asking you to spend your last few days fighting windmills. And furthermore, you won't have to worry about getting locked out of your office building, or locked out of the bathroom, because they gave your keys to your replacement. Extremely expensive consultants don't usually have to deal with such non-sense. They're too expensive to dick around with.

    9. Re:Go for it, AND be loyal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I had a similar situation. I had a job-offer that would have had me leave two weeks before a major go-live. The new job was a type of position I was interested in, and was a good pay increase, so I knew I was going to take it. But, I felt loyalty to a company that had been really good to me for a number of years.

      So I had my cake and ate it too. I asked the new company if I could delay my start by a month - and explained in detail how I would not be serving my current employer well by leaving at the suggested time-frame. The new company was a little disappointed at first, but in the end they said that if I had been working for them, they would have wanted to receive the same treatment from me. So they let me set my start date, and I was able to give a "five-week notice" rather than a the standard two-week.

      My then-current-employer appreciated the extra time for me to support the go-live and spend more time transitioning my work, my future employer respected my decision and worked with me, and I avoided the guilt of leaving at a very inopportune time.

      My current employer won, my future employer won, and I won. That's three wins!

    10. Re:Go for it, AND be loyal by randyleepublic · · Score: 1

      >> Your new employer will appreciate your loyalty, too, when you explain to them how you still need to help your old company out.

      Caution! I have had this backfire on me horribly. Better to cut the knot cleanly. The new employer is not hiring a consultant with other clients. They are hiring an employee, and I have seen what can happen when they suddenly, despite full information going in, decide that they didn't get what they thought they were getting.

      I was accused of being a spy for my former employer, and fired on the spot.

      --
      Social Credit would solve everything...
  9. What? by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 1

    Loyalty means nothing in the new corporate century.

    Believe me, they'll sell YOU out if/when they have the chance. Do what you think is right but make sure you don't hurt yourself.

    1. Re:What? by erroneus · · Score: 1

      They demand loyalty but do not give it. That's the way of things. They get pretty butt-hurt and surprised if you are unhappy with the way things are and are willing to leave to get something better.

    2. Re:What? by The+Man · · Score: 1

      Do what you think is right but make sure you don't hurt yourself.

      Actually, I don't like this thinking. You're trying to say the right thing but can't bring yourself to do it. I'll help.

      Do what you think is wrong.

      There, I said it. Many of us were raised with a very outdated set of values. If, like me, you're one of them, you need to invert your moral compass when making decisions about relationships with people or corporate entities. What you think is wrong is most likely going to be best for you, and it's most likely what everyone expects you to do anyway. Think of it like driving a car: you want to do what everyone around you expects because that's how you avoid becoming a grease smear on the pavement. Throw in the fact that people who act in the ways we were taught are "wrong" are the people who get what they want. I'm sorry to say it, but you need to start doing all the wrong things if you want to get ahead.

  10. No commute? by stoicfaux · · Score: 4, Insightful

    plus their office is practically outside my front door (as opposed to my current 45 minute commute each way). This would make a massive difference to my life.

    The commute alone is worth switching for. That's an (unpaid) hour and a half of your life that you get back.

    1. Re:No commute? by marnues · · Score: 1

      I certainly hope your friends at your old company will understand purely for this. No one should be commuting away so much of their day. That's either personal time or company time. Either one is trouble. Once you have some time with your new job and more than an hour opens up each day, you'll not think twice about your old job. Your friends perhaps, but let them continue being friends! I'd rather drive 45 minutes to a BBQ than a job!

    2. Re:No commute? by teh+kurisu · · Score: 1

      I think "practically outside my front door" is awfully close. You'd have to be very careful that your work life doesn't encroach on your home life with that kind of proximity.

      I would also make sure to get out enough. Get out of the office and go home for lunch, now that you can. And make sure to get out of the immediate area sometimes, preferably by walking or cycling. Aside from the physical exercise, it helps to move around a bit to avoid cabin fever setting in.

    3. Re:No commute? by Fast+Thick+Pants · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I very much agree. You can even repurpose that hour and a half to make yourself available on a consulting basis to the old gig. You know they're going to be calling you anyway, so you might as well get paid for it. You'll be saving money and time on the commute, and padding your income a little. Helping the old shop through the post-you transitional phase is good karma, and the unburnt bridge may come in handy at some point in the future.

    4. Re:No commute? by MadKeithV · · Score: 2

      I certainly hope your friends at your old company will understand purely for this. No one should be commuting away so much of their day. That's either personal time or company time. Either one is trouble. Once you have some time with your new job and more than an hour opens up each day, you'll not think twice about your old job. Your friends perhaps, but let them continue being friends! I'd rather drive 45 minutes to a BBQ than a job!

      Quoted for truth, by someone with a one-commute of over an hour.
      Consider this calculation (european standards, sorry USians):

      • You work 8 hours a day.
      • You commute 2 hours a day
      • You sleep 8 hours a day.
      • You do household chores 2 hours a day

      That's 20 hours, which leaves you 4 hours of "free time". Now consider that commute goes away. You have just given yourself a 50% raise in free time. If you value that time, and you can make do with the money you make, you'd need a much more substantial raise to stick with the commute if that's your type of logic.

    5. Re:No commute? by Phillip+Birmingham · · Score: 1

      Now, that is a good idea.

      --
      Make me aerodynamic in the evening air
    6. Re:No commute? by hal2814 · · Score: 1

      I was worried about work life encroachment when I took a job 3 miles from my home. Serious work life encroachment happened to me a few years earlier when I took a primarily telecommuting job. But it turns out I loved the close-office arrangement so much more than telecommuting. There was practically no commute and I was still able to leave my work life at the office. I was getting all of the benefits of telecommuting with none of the negatives.

    7. Re:No commute? by alphatel · · Score: 1

      plus their office is practically outside my front door (as opposed to my current 45 minute commute each way). This would make a massive difference to my life.

      The commute alone is worth switching for. That's an (unpaid) hour and a half of your life that you get back.

      Don't be foolish. Ask for the matching raise _and_ the ability to work from home 2 days a week. Else you'll have to take the other offer. Not much to it.

      --
      When the foot seeks the place of the head, the line is crossed. Know your place. Keep your place. Be a shoe.
    8. Re:No commute? by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      I've got to think this is the best option. You get the increased salary, the shorter commute (which is probably a far greater improvement on the quality of life), and you still get to have some connection and good terms with your old company and the people there you consider friends. I've left places on good terms in the past and continued to do work with them, and it's generally gone well. As long as you're honest with your old employer about the reasons for leaving, I don't imagine they're going to hold it against you.

    9. Re:No commute? by eepok · · Score: 1

      That doesn't sound so bad. Here's my schedule.

      6:45am - Wake, shower, and dress (I don't consider this personal time)
      7:10am - Commute to work (obviously not personal time)
      7:40am - Start work
      5:15pm - Leave work, Commute home
      5:35pm - Arrive at home
      10:00pm - Go to sleep

      I put in some extra time because I'm one of those lucky people who gets to enjoy what he does at work. Anyway, there's a bit of a catch with my schedule: I bike commute. I get a healthy dose of exercise on my short 2.5-mile commute route both in the morning and in the afternoon.

      I don't pay for parking. ($57/month on my campus)
      I don't pay for auto-insurance. (I choose not to own a car, but non-commuter cars can get significantly lower auto insurance)
      I don't pay an auto-loan.
      I don't pay for gasoline.
      I don't pay for a gym membership.

      However, my rent is quite high. To live near the school, my partner and I pay $1530/month for a 700 sq. ft. 1-bedroom apartment. In other parts of the country, I'm sure rent would be much less severe and living near work so that one can completely abandoned motorized commuting would be even easier (financially).

    10. Re:No commute? by anerki · · Score: 1

      It's not just an (unpaid) hour and a half of your life that you get back.

      It's an hour and a half of your life back, every workday.

      And it'll be 45 minutes twice when you want it, not just at the end of the day, attached to it: the first months all days will feel like you're sleeping in, you'll have time for that proper breakfast again, you'll be able to plan different activities in the evening since a) you have more time in the evening and b) don't have to get up as early in the morning, if you have any, it'll be time your kids aren't sleeping, etc.

      Even if it was just the commute it would be worth considering if you ask me.

      So consider the time you're gaining and don't forget you're not just loyal to your current job, you're also on a friendly basis. They know you, and considering that, will probably understand and either accept or compensate (maybe flexible hours? overwork more properly payed in days off, etc.).

      So it's up to you really. What advice do we need to give really, you're obviously taking the time to consider the consequences which means you care enough to. Whatever you decide, it'll be the right thing.

      --
      Life is great! (as told by Lady Susan)
    11. Re:No commute? by rwven · · Score: 1

      This is pretty much it. I'd make the switch WITHOUT the raise if I got that much extra time in my day.

      Change is also good as a developer. It keeps you sharp and helps you grow in your skills. Staying in the same job for many years is something that makes me wary of any developer I interview. Years = stagnation, and becoming steadfast in your ways....which is never a good idea in the tech industry.

    12. Re:No commute? by JamesP · · Score: 1

      Really? A 45 min commute is not on my list of "absolute hell"

      Of course it depends if it's by car, or bus/train etc

      I would absolutely commute 45 minutes for a good job. It may be tiring, yes, but it's not very far from the average (and even better than the average) for most major cities

      Having said that, working close to home is very pleasant.

      --
      how long until /. fixes commenting on Chrome?
    13. Re:No commute? by Surt · · Score: 1

      It somewhat depends on how old you are. Up to about the age of 35, a 45 minute commute is very manageable. After that, it will start to cause health problems that will scare you.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    14. Re:No commute? by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      Try commuting 2.5 mi each way by bike in New Orleans. Unless you have showers at work, it's a non-starter.

    15. Re:No commute? by eepok · · Score: 1

      Indeed. Certain climates are better than others for a bike commute. I know people who bike commute in the dead of winter in Minneapolis and plenty who do in the summer in the southwest US (as I do). But humidity in the American South, in my opinion, is the barely conducive to human existence, let alone joyful biking.

      (Disclaimer: I grew up in California's arid Inland Empire with 120+ degree summers. I'm a humidity WIMP.)

    16. Re:No commute? by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      A nephew of mine visited from Denver one August. After one (brief) attempt to go for a bike ride, he came in and said "Now I know why everyone's fat here."

    17. Re:No commute? by Wraithlyn · · Score: 1

      This. How much do you value your time? Seriously, multiply your average hourly rate by hours saved.

      I eliminated 1.5 hours of daily commuting by moving downtown a couple years ago. I generally contract out at $75/hour, and estimate I work about 45 weeks of the year after accounting for vacation, sick days, and holidays. That's 337.5 hrs per year saved, which @ $75/hr is over $25K! (Obviously that's not "real" money, unless you spend all that time contracting, but it's a way of putting an objective price tag on your free time). So even though my rent was more expensive downtown, it was worth it to me to get so much time back.

      And that doesn't even take into account dropping transportation expenses (gas, transit, etc) to near zero, not to mention the reduced stress from not having to commute every day (which IMHO is huge). And you get to act all smug about reducing your carbon footprint too! ;)

      TL;DR: Eliminating your commute will have an enormously beneficial impact of your quality of life that is hard to overstate.

      My advice: Take the new job, stress to your current employer that the location is the biggest factor (they will understand that, and it makes you look way less mercenary/disloyal) and make yourself available to them to help with any transition issues. This will let you take the better offer, while still retaining a good relationship with your previous employee.

      --
      "Mind, as manifested by the capacity to make choices, is to some extent present in every electron." -Freeman Dyson
    18. Re:No commute? by JamesP · · Score: 1

      I agree with you, but I guess there's more to it than only time.

      A 45 minute on a calm road isn't very stressful.

      I once had a "choice", a 30 min "pedal to the metal" commute or a 1h through city traffic. City traffic was usually less stressful

      --
      how long until /. fixes commenting on Chrome?
    19. Re:No commute? by Geminii · · Score: 1

      It's an unpaid seven and a half hours a week. That's like being given a seven thousand pound raise AND every Friday off!

    20. Re:No commute? by ahodgson · · Score: 1

      I commute about 55 minutes each way. About 20 minutes is walking, and the rest on the train. It's a bit of exercise and I can read on the train (and while walking for that matter, when it's not dark and/or raining). I'm not crazy about the amount of time it eats up, but it's not horrible, and certainly not unhealthy.

  11. Loyalty? by kimvette · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Loyalty to your employer? Are you kidding? They would fire your ass in a heartbeat as soon as the numbers exhibit a downturn. Our parents' generation could rely on employers to consider loyalty a two-way street; you don't job surf and they give you all kinds of benefits including pensions, profit sharing, and so on. Now, decision makers don't think twice about firing thousands of workers when the numbers take a temporary dip, just so they can show shareholders a temporary spike in profits to get their bonuses.

    Besides, do you live to work, or do you work to live?

    Fuck loyalty to your employer. Take the better offer.

    --
    The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    1. Re:Loyalty? by scamper_22 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Loyalty to some nameless corporation? No.

      But ultimately, life is about the relationships you build.
      Your manage, that product manger, your director, your coop students, your underlings...

      These are people like any other who understand loyalty.
      Loyalty to the company and these folks is different, but intertwined.

      You don't leave the company without leaving all those individuals

      It's a complicated social world and you have to be smart about it.

      I would never leave a good job for a few thousand.
      1. Ask your employer to match the salary. A few thousand is nothing for a company. The sales guy probably drink that much in a month.
      2. In the grand scheme, do you enjoy the work? Do you like your colleagues?

    2. Re:Loyalty? by teh+kurisu · · Score: 1

      Now, decision makers don't think twice about firing thousands of workers when the numbers take a temporary dip

      I want to quote a part of the summary that is being missed by a lot of people who are putting forward an argument similar to yours (emphasis mine):

      As a senior developer for a small IT company

      Small companies won't fire thousands of employees at a time, because they don't have thousands of employees to fire. They certainly won't fire employees based on a brief downturn in numbers - it costs a small business a huge amount of resources in order to train somebody up, so they tend to hold on to people during dips so that they can cope when things pick up.

      And the directors don't usually have to justify themselves to shareholders, because they are the shareholders.

    3. Re:Loyalty? by webheaded · · Score: 2

      Dude, in US dollars this guy is talking about somewhere in the ball park of $10,000. I don't know about you, but that makes things a little different. 10k dollar raise and a commute that is a fraction of the old one...I mean shit...that's hitting the jackpot. Quite frankly, I can learn to like my colleagues at the new place as long as there aren't warning signs of it being a hell hole. That's why you leave on good terms with the old employer. The act of leaving shouldn't burn any bridges if you aren't an asshole about it. If it was me, I'd offer to help them over the phone here and there after I left...possibly for free if I liked the people there enough. An hour on the phone here or there isn't a big idea and the whole "money is time" idea is bullshit anyway. I wouldn't be doing anything productive during that hour anyway so I can do something nice for people I like.

      --
      "Those who would sacrifice essential liberties for a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - BenF
    4. Re:Loyalty? by hey! · · Score: 1

      Well, there is such a thing as professional pride, which in a way is loyalty to self. Maybe the poster prefers to be a stand-up guy when people put their trust in him, whether or not they'd do the same for him. Maybe be actually (gasp) cares about his work, or his customers and co-workers.

      If push comes to shove, sure: look out for number one. But that doesn't mean you have to be a heartless bastard.

      What I would do in this case is approach the second company first, and say, "This is a critical time for my current employer; I'd like to give him longer notice than just two weeks. I'll also need to be available to answer questions and maybe go to an occasional meeting to get my replacement over the tough spots." If the new company doesn't understand and support this, I'd have my doubts about working for them.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    5. Re:Loyalty? by phillips321 · · Score: 1

      Yeah but everyone buys the nice guy a pint in the bar afterwards! Lose the battle but win the war ;-)

    6. Re:Loyalty? by scamper_22 · · Score: 1

      commute reduction? Definitely a plus.

      I'm Canadian. 10K... after taxes... depending on your jurisdiction in the senior salary range... is going to work out to like 6k. It's not life changing

      Moving to a new job is diving into a new pool. You might not like it. You might not like the new people. You might not like the new work. Who knows.

      I personally wouldn't leave a known good situation for 10K. But that's just me.

    7. Re:Loyalty? by shentino · · Score: 1

      Nice guys finish last, but the nasty ones get disqualified later by karma.

    8. Re:Loyalty? by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      My father got laid off in the 1980s. My grandfather got laid off in the 1950s. There was no promise of a permanent job.

      The plural of anecdote is not data.

      That is a myth created by union thugs who are trying to grab power over hiring and firing decisions.

      Randian drivel. Thirty years ago, yes it was possible if not common to buy a house, a car, and support a stay-home mother based on a single union salary. Then the Reagan tax cuts, corporate trade, and morans cutting off their noses to spite their faces (i.e., working class people buying union-busting propaganda) took care of that.

    9. Re:Loyalty? by ShakaUVM · · Score: 1

      >>Loyalty to your employer? Are you kidding? They would fire your ass in a heartbeat as soon as the numbers exhibit a downturn.

      Weird concept, I know, but not all companies are like that. While, yeah, sure, if a company is losing money eventually it has to either increase revenue or decrease costs, a number of corporations have made pledges of "no layoffs" during the current recession, and occasionally do other things that aren't quite evil.

      Corporations are run by people, and not all people in corporations are the horrible soulless monsters that you think they are. To be fair, there's a lot of sociopaths in upper management (it selects for it), but it's not 100%.

      If TFA talks about the guy being friends with the management, you shouldn't immediately leap to the conclusion that he's lying about this fact.

    10. Re:Loyalty? by ShakaUVM · · Score: 1

      >>Thirty years ago, yes it was possible if not common to buy a house, a car, and support a stay-home mother based on a single union salary.

      Because longshoremen deserve six digit salaries for all the time they put in in college, am I right? (http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/06207/708719-96.stm)

      When you have guys out of high school making more money than, let's say, pharmacists that put in 9 years of undergrad and pharmacy school, I consider that to be an inversion of how things should be.

      >>Then the Reagan tax cuts, corporate trade, and morans

      Morans, eh? You can say that again.

    11. Re:Loyalty? by B4RSK · · Score: 1

      $10k and it sounds like ~70mins a day in saved commute. That's over 23 hours a month in time not wasted -- over half a work week! Maybe he'll waste that time anyway but there are certainly many productive things he could do with it.

      --
      Some people are like slinkies--basically useless but they bring a smile to your face when pushed down the stairs.
    12. Re:Loyalty? by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      Because longshoremen deserve six digit salaries for all the time they put in in college, am I right?

      A damn sight more than Carly Fiorina deserved a $20 million severance for driving HP into the ground, or the CEO of Wal-Mart making more in one month than the average Wal-Mart employee makes in his or her lifetime.

      Now, WTF was your point again? I suppose you also really, really, really wish the voice actors of the Simpsons should STFU and take their pay cuts because they will still get paid six figures per episode, nevermind how many billions that Fox has made and will continue to make off their work.

      When you have guys out of high school making more money than, let's say, pharmacists that put in 9 years of undergrad and pharmacy school, I consider that to be an inversion of how things should be.

      That's because you're a sophist pretending the exception is the rule, and comparing a guy fresh out of college to someone who has accumulated how many years of experience and seniority?

      Morans, eh? You can say that again.

      Yes, I will. You're attitude makes perfect sense if you're in the top 1% of 1%. Otherwise, you're no more intelligent than a crab.

    13. Re:Loyalty? by ShakaUVM · · Score: 1

      >>That's because you're a sophist pretending the exception is the rule, and comparing a guy fresh out of college to someone who has accumulated how many years of experience and seniority?

      No. Idiot.

      I was comparing average salaries, one from a manual labor job, the other from one requiring 9 years of college and passing boards.

      Average wage for a pharmacist in Los Angeles is $110k. Average for a longshoreman in LA in 2002 was (only) $120k, so they went on strike to protest their low wages. Now they make $140k.

      Ain't unions great?

      >>Yes, I will. You're attitude makes perfect sense if you're in the top 1% of 1%. Otherwise, you're no more intelligent than a crab.

      Michael Moore on the radio yesterday said that, quote, "Unions invented the middle class". (So there was no middle class before the 1800s, Moore? Lol.) I guess if you're one of those Moore-ons, then I can see why you'd have such a topsy-turvy way of thinking, where it's *right* for a manual laborer to make more money than someone with a lot of training. Since they're union, they deserve to make over twice the national median average?

      Pull your head out of your Marxist ass.

    14. Re:Loyalty? by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      I was comparing average salaries

      Oh?

      When you have guys out of high school making more money than, let's say, pharmacists that put in 9 years of undergrad and pharmacy school

      The word "average" is not in your sentence. Fuckwit.

      Average wage for a pharmacist in Los Angeles is $110k. Average for a longshoreman in LA in 2002 was (only) $120k, so they went on strike to protest their low wages. Now they make $140k.

      And the CEO of publisher Gannett just retired with a $37 million retirement package, after laying off 20,000 workers and seeing his stock price decline. And yet here you are, whining that a fraction of a percentage of the American blue collar workforce can make more than someone who went to college.

      Could your sense of priorities be any more broken?

      Ain't unions great?

      Yes. They are. You like having weekends? You like not having to compete with 12 year olds in the labor force? You like paid vacations? Thank unions.

      If you're in the Forbes 400, your attitude makes perfect sense, Shaka. If you're not, then you're just a crab sucking corporate Koch and spitting the disgusting results on your fellow workers.

    15. Re:Loyalty? by ShakaUVM · · Score: 1

      >>The word "average" is not in your sentence. Fuckwit.

      I said, "When you have guys out of high school making more money than, let's say, pharmacists..." that implies average. Of course, the notion is so preposterous you obviously assumed I was talking about experienced longshoremen vs. new pharmacists, but hey, nice to know you agree with me.

      >>And the CEO of publisher Gannett just retired with a $37 million retirement package,

      Why do you keep talking about CEOs? I'm talking about normal-person wages.

      >>whining that a fraction of a percentage of the American blue collar workforce can make more than someone who went to college.

      High school grads that make nearly triple the median household average in America, putting them in the top 5% of all income earners for doing nothing more than driving forklifts around. Please, fuck-twat, please try to justify that to me.

      If you add together all the longshoremen, the total drain on our economy is much greater than that of some shark CEO.

  12. Document by David+Gerard · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Either way, you should document the hell out of everything so that if you were hit by a bus tomorrow they wouldn't be similarly fucked.

    --
    http://rocknerd.co.uk
    1. Re:Document by royallthefourth · · Score: 2

      A good developer would warn them of this, but he can't take action on it until they decide to actually assign him the task of documentation. In the real world, they won't care about documentation until it's too late and the whole time he will have been working on some other undocumented code. They'll tell him to document things, but will never be willing to push back the schedule to deal with the extra work of creating the docs. At least that's been my experience.

      Of course if he's actually hit by a bus, he no longer needs to worry about it!

    2. Re:Document by delinear · · Score: 1

      Agreed, most places I've worked have singularly failed to realise the importance of documentation until it's too late. Unless you're the one who assigns the work allocations, you can harp on about the need for documentation until you're blue in the face but there's zero you can do if the company doesn't want to take you off what they see as "profit generating" work (even though much of the time they could save a small fortune in efficiency gains by documenting things so they can be shared amongst the less experienced members of the team).

    3. Re:Document by hedwards · · Score: 1

      I suppose in cases where the employer doesn't allow for that sort of thorough documentation that's probably a sign to move elsewhere. Documentation is a part of many jobs and if the employer doesn't allow for that time, they're probably not going to do well in the future.

      Depending upon the specifics it might be as simple as adding a line to a notebook, but ultimately, it's not really documented if it isn't organized and that doesn't just happen organically for most people. Also, the documentation isn't just for you, it's for those who come in afterwards to get them up to speed, so that you don't have to spend that much more time prepping them or worrying about it catching up with you.

    4. Re:Document by unrtst · · Score: 1

      I hate this.

      I hear similar things about all sorts of stuff that people don't do because management doesn't allocate time for those things.

      If you're hired to do a job, then you are a professional at it. Be one, and do things properly. It's your job to be the professional at your task. In my experience, it's EXTREMELY unlikely that they'll fire you for doing a good and thorough job, and it won't take long for them to notice the benefits if you're one of few doing it, and others are not - cause the others will end up having more ongoing problems, and you'll end up more productive (ex. taking the time to formalize a process and possibly automate it, rather than just get it done, and next time it won't take you any time at all).

      I just don't get how so many people can recognize how important and obviously necessary documentation is, but can shrug it off and pass the blame to management so easily. If you've fully argued the case to management, and they simply won't allow you to document (threaten to fire you), let them fire you - take the unemployment (documentation is part of every developers job duties, and they can't justly fire you for doing your job, so you'll get unemployment) and find a better job. If they asked you to skip all input validation, stop using transactions, forbid version control, etc because those take extra time, would you put up with that as well?

    5. Re:Document by webheaded · · Score: 1

      This is incredibly important but definitely easier said than done. I got promoted to a new position and quite frankly, the people I left behind just don't give as much of a shit about the job to even do the things I was doing. I set them up as well as I could and still talk to them on a somewhat regular basis (same company just a different job). I left docs or tried to teach people (it's a help desk job...nothing THAT complicated) but some things they either don't give enough of a shit, apparently don't understand the instructions I wrote (?!), or they forgot what I told them. I was like the huge nerd/technowhiz of the group and ended up making a lot of things to make their jobs easier or gather metrics we did not gather before. Sometimes just getting them to use it was like pulling teeth...much less getting someone to maintain it. On the other hand, if they DID use it, they liked it, and if they were using it enough...they figured out how to maintain it relatively well after I left.

      Fortunately, despite these annoyances, I still quite like the people over there and actually enjoy talking to them. That's a good thing for both of us. :p

      --
      "Those who would sacrifice essential liberties for a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - BenF
    6. Re:Document by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Every time they've said "we're going to call you if we run into troubles, no one else knows this stuff." But they've never called. Turns you that even important jobs can be replaced. Maybe the new person won't do as well a job but they'll fumble along. Lack of docs may make them pull out their hair but they'll get through it. Schedules will change maybe, products get delayed. Really, there is almost no job out there that can't get a replacement. A company that is so dependent upon a single person is highly vulnerable and needs to change.

      I do like to document stuff shortly before I leave. Stuff that never goes into specs or requirements or all the formal docs (I never write those, some manager or marketing person does that). Things like build procedures, showing where my code is on my machine for that half finished project, where to hit the debugger to make it work, etc.

    7. Re:Document by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      A good developer will have decent comments in the code anyway. Nothing more frustrating than seeing "magic_register = 0x4A3C" with no comments, and the devs who write that are NOT missed when they leave.

    8. Re:Document by rawler · · Score: 1

      Certainly, but it's close to impossible to cover all important know-how in documentation.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tacit_knowledge

    9. Re:Document by David+Gerard · · Score: 1

      That it's theoretically impossible doesn't mean it isn't worth trying to be useful.

      The best way I find is to document whatever I wish I'd known before I started the job in question. Then I find it useful when I come back to it three months later and need to know what I did.

      --
      http://rocknerd.co.uk
    10. Re:Document by Geminii · · Score: 1

      I sometimes wonder if people document everything about their job and then offer to sell the documentation to the company, or make sure it's part of their personal possessions so that in the event of their demise, their estate could sell it back to the company in order to increase the inheritance going to family.

    11. Re:Document by mattpalmer1086 · · Score: 1

      I just left an organization I'd been in for 8 years, so I was also leaving behind a fair few systems. The guy who was taking over most of them had all the documentation he needed to operate the systems. So I do agree that documentation is really important (although sadly often neglected).

      What he didn't understand was why it was like that in the first place. What came out of our discussions before I left was the history - the decisions, compromises, optimizations, and mistakes that shaped them. I could see that afterwards he really got it, and felt confident to take them forwards. It made me realize how almost all documentation presents things as finished products, leaving out how it arrived in that shape.

      Of course, if you're hit by a bus, all you have is the documentation.

    12. Re:Document by David+Gerard · · Score: 1

      Heh. In our intranet wiki - which I treat as my personal notes to self - I take the time to add the "why" and the paths not taken!

      --
      http://rocknerd.co.uk
  13. All obligations have been met by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 3, Informative

    Assuming that all contractual obligations have been met, you've exchanged your work for their money. If you no longer wish to exchange your work for their money, that's no problem. Rest assured, if they no longer wanted to exchange their money for your work, they'd have no problem terminating that little arrangement.

    Besides, there are ways of arranging for exclusivity. In many fields, they're codified. Retainers, tenure, whatever. If they wanted to keep you for a fixed amount of time, they'd have entered into contractual negotiations with you.

    If you want to leave, leave. Just make sure you follow the legal and standard practices; two weeks notice or whatever it is across the pond.

    --
    Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  14. Make the right decision for you. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I've just been in a similar situation, it's a tough decision to make but you have to do what is best for you. i personally handed my notice in and i've been replaced in the short term by two contractors. whilst they shop around to find the right perm developer.

  15. Get your priorities straight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Life is too short for you to fuss over things that are secondary to you. You need to figure out what your priorities are, and to act accordingly.

    If you really want that short commute to work, you can move. If you really want that higher salary, you can invite your current employer to bid against your potential employer. If your coworkers are really like family to you, then you should stay regardless. But if not...well....consequences to your real family should rank higher than consequences to your fake one.

    Figure out what is real to you, and everything else is easy.

  16. You should leave by UconnGuy · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Why wouldn't you? You have no guarantees that after the two Jr Devs get up to speed, they don't get rid of you (surely they are making less). The company would also have no qualms about laying you off if they need to - it's only business.

    If upper mgmt were REALLY your friends, they would want what's best for you. If they are bitter about you leaving, then they are not really your friends.

    Ultimately, you need to do what's best for YOU.

  17. Loyalty to yourself first by lavalyn · · Score: 1

    The days of secure employment are long over, and management will eliminate your role if it makes financial sense to. You should stay "loyal" only insofar as that the employment is mutually beneficial and both sides get good value of the other.

    --
    Doing the Right Thing should not be preempted by making a buck.
  18. Consulting by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why not take the new job & act as a consultant on the old job?

    --
    Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    1. Re:Consulting by Fahrvergnuugen · · Score: 1

      +1 for stating the win-win scenario. Make sure the new job offer is firm and then explain to your co-workers / friends what the situation is, while offering yourself up on a consultant basis as a way out for them.

      --
      Kiteboarding Gear Mention slashdot and get 10% off!
    2. Re:Consulting by rycamor · · Score: 1

      This has always worked out well for me at some level or other. If you make it clear that your reason for leaving is not a negative one (IE. hating your boss/job/whatever) and that you are willing to do whatever you can to help them make the transition, usually employers are quite reasonable about such things. One of my former employers (a branch of a very large company) still contacts me occasionally even 4 years after my departure.

      Never burn bridges, but never limit yourself due to feeling sorry for your employer.

    3. Re:Consulting by webheaded · · Score: 1

      I've seen this suggestion several times in here and I wonder how many companies actually do that. Like...depending on the size of the company, I can almost guarantee no one that needs the authority has it to hire you as a consultant and no one that does have the authority to authorize it. Granted I'm not a programmer (I work inside a helpdesk..thankfully not ON the helpdesk) but I've never heard of any department anywhere inside this company hiring someone as a consultant. People leave and that's pretty much it. I wonder how common hiring a consultant even is, to be honest. Of course again...I'm not really in a related field. It just seems like a foreign thing to me.

      --
      "Those who would sacrifice essential liberties for a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - BenF
  19. Rels 1 and 2 by rmkeene · · Score: 2

    Rule 1: Always do what is best for you. The company has no loyalty what so ever to you. Individual managers may have loyalty but the 'company' has none. Rule 2: Never burn your bridges. Leave on the best good will terms possible.

  20. Offer them a support/transition contract by frooddude · · Score: 1

    If they really mean something to you, offer them nice terms on a transition contract. Make sure the contract doesn't F you tho.

  21. Depends on the company by 0racle · · Score: 1

    Does the company reward loyalty? If the shoe was on the other foot and times were tough, would they take into account your work and loyalty and try to keep you on?

    Honestly, I doubt they give a second thought to your loyalty. The times when it was a good idea to be loyal to an employer are by and large long since gone. They are only looking at their bottom line, you basically have to do the same.

    Company loyalty now really only comes back to bite you in the ass, there is no benefit for the employee.

    --
    "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
  22. half the problem is what you're getting paid. by SkunkPussy · · Score: 2

    this means they're not paying you enough; therefore you should see if they'll match what the other company will offer. dunno what you could do about the 90 mins travel time though

    --
    SURELY NOT!!!!!
    1. Re:half the problem is what you're getting paid. by guruevi · · Score: 1

      Move. Ask them to pay the difference + x% and a relocation if you think the job is long-term. You also got to think, what will happen after I finish this project with this company. Loyalty is non-existent in business, your co-workers may be friends but true friends will support you whatever decision you make.

      Apparently they already decided to have 2 junior developers who would gladly take your place for bug fixing - you gotta think - is that their strategy to 'work you out' while they take 2 cheaper people instead of keeping you and hiring 1 cheaper person.

      Give them notice, work it out, be a consultant if your new boss agrees on that.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    2. Re:half the problem is what you're getting paid. by smartaleckkill · · Score: 1

      this

      7k GBP is around 11k USD; loyalty schmoyalty, you're seriously underpaid

    3. Re:half the problem is what you're getting paid. by Geminii · · Score: 1

      See if the smaller company is willing to allow telecommuting?

  23. Loyalty never pays by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    Loyalty never pays in the modern corporate world, the financial aspect of this decision is easy. It's a moral decision you have to make, so do whatever you feel is right.

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  24. Take the job by EllF · · Score: 1

    They would show you zero iotas of loyalty if it was in their best interest. Walk away, take the better job, and don't look back. It's just business. Don't make the mistake of confusing it for something different.

    --
    We who were living are now dying
    With a little patience
  25. Got to be kidding me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This is 2011, not 1911. Loyalty is rewarded with more work, not more pay. When you reach the point where you could easily perform your boss' job, your reward will be a layoff.

    The days of slowly but surely climbing the corporate ladder on one's own merit are long gone. The name of the game today is "networking" (i.e. social expertise).

  26. What Would The Dude Do? by Yert · · Score: 1

    I'd go into a closed-door meeting with management and say "I've been offered a position at another company making 7k more and with a much shorter commute, but I like working here. What can you offer me?" If they aren't willing to play ball, give notice. At that point, they may try to make an offer - unless it's even more than the 7k, don't accept; they'll always be looking to replace you. If they make you a reasonable offer, take it and enjoy your new old job.

    --
    Truck driver, plumber, Linux systems engineer.
    1. Re:What Would The Dude Do? by mcmonkey · · Score: 1

      I'd like to hear some other opinions of this plan.

      My feeling is, if management feels backed in to a corner, they'll match the raise. And then immediately start looking for a replacement. They'll assume "offered a position" means sending out C.V.s and taking interviews. (Were you really sick that day? Were you really late due to car problems?) A raise will be enough to keep you for now, but you've shown disloyalty just by going out and looking for other offers. All you've done is give them advanced warning to replace you before you eventually quit.

      Perhaps I'm a cynic (OK, I'm a cynic) but I'd need job security in writing with remuneration significantly better than the original offer before I'd ask for or consider any counter-offer.

    2. Re:What Would The Dude Do? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      You were always an adversary to management in that respect. Now everybody knows it. Before only the manager knew it.

      You don't want to work for a company that expects you to be a doormat anyhow.

      When they try to 'get the money back some other way' you jump then. If you sense this from you management you should never document anything.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    3. Re:What Would The Dude Do? by dcollins · · Score: 1

      Personally, I think this is the worst possible plan. There's the problems everyone else has pointed out (bad blood, start training a replacement, etc.) But for the primary thing is that you're putting the decision in someone else's hands. You should know which place your heart is telling you to work at, and pursue that place. Throwing a "hail mary pass" out and letting someone else dictate your path is generally not a recipe for personal satisfaction.

      --
      We know where leadership by an anti-intellectual "strongman" who scapegoats minorities and likes boisterous rallies goes
  27. Be sure of yourself first by Lawrence_Bird · · Score: 1

    If you have no doubt that your skills are worth the extra money and that 'big' company is unlikely to be in difficult financial straights the next few years, make the move. Try your best not to burn bridges and you are probably best off speaking about the quality of life issues rather than the money if pressed by your current employer who may well match or do some other nice thing for you. But this sounds like it is as much about money as it is location, and money will not offset 1.5 to 2 hours a day commuting. Loyalty is a very nebulous thing now a days.

    1. Re:Be sure of yourself first by bsDaemon · · Score: 1

      If they could match the money, or come close, and trade a day of telecommute, it might be worth staying. 5k and monday or friday at home might well be an even trade for 7k and a reduced daily commute.

  28. Loyalty and Outsourcing? by Klync · · Score: 2

    I was going to side with you on the loyalty argument, until I read that your employer outsources (some of) their programming. What does that say about their commitment to loyalty? On the one hand, it helps to maintain a good network of industry contacts for the long-term good of your career. On the other hand, it *is* possible to maintain a good relationship with your old co-workers, while simultaneously "looking out for number one".

      Is you leaving going to be *difficult*, or will it break their entire business? That is, you can rest easy if you cause a bit of inconvenience, but just try not to screw them too badly: ask your new employer if you can have a couple of weeks before you officially start; or a "transition period" where you can remain on-call (e.g. a half-day a week when needed) to the old team.

    --

    ----
    Not to be confused with Col.
    1. Re:Loyalty and Outsourcing? by Comrade+Ogilvy · · Score: 1

      You are one of the few that brought this up. Good catch. I might have dismissed your point here but then I remembered this part: "Unfortunately, [the junior employees] are still a long way from grasping the technologies used ".

      Not only does this company outsources some of their work, they also hire two(!) engineers who are taking substantial time to grasp the technology, much less be productive on the product. I am feeling uneasy about this pattern.

    2. Re:Loyalty and Outsourcing? by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      It might mean nothing, maybe. It's possible that they had a short term thing that needed to get done and they outsourced rather than grew to accommodate the brief spike in additional workload. One advantage of outsourcing is that you have more control over when the relationship begins and ends.

      It's even possible that it was not cheaper than they could've done it for in-house if they had the resources, but developing those resources would have been prohibitively expensive at the time.

      car analogy:
      If you had to move across town, would you buy a truck to move your stuff?

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  29. See this situation before... by mikael · · Score: 2

    This looks like the typical situation of company A trying to fuck over company B, just when company B is about to release a product. Company A won't be wanting to help you out, but simply get you away from company B. They probably won't treat you any better, if not worse.

    I'd stay until the project is complete - explain that to company B. If they don't appreciate that, then they don't really want you that badly.

    Seen this happen before to other people, and happen to myself. In the long term, having worked on a project from start to finish counts more than leaving half-way through. Who knows, it might be get bought out by a large company.

    --
    Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    1. Re:See this situation before... by PPH · · Score: 1

      This is the one good argument for staying put through the critical release event. If you see the current project through to completion (is any product actually complete?) then that will look better on your CV. If not, future employers might question the wisdom of trusting you with a critical project.

      I didn't see where the new company was involved in direct competition with your current employer or had any interest in screwing up their project. If this is in fact the case, I'd think long and hard about ever taking the new job offer. It could be that they don't really value you for anything other then the trouble your transfer will cause and you won't last long in the new position. Or be given work of any interest.

      If this is a legit offer, your new employer should appreciate your dedication to completing an assigned task. They'll wait.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    2. Re:See this situation before... by Kjella · · Score: 1

      This looks like the typical situation of company A trying to fuck over company B, just when company B is about to release a product. Company A won't be wanting to help you out, but simply get you away from company B. They probably won't treat you any better, if not worse.

      Huh, what, where? "The same as I'm already doing" can be e.g. developer or architect, but there's nothing saying they're even remotely going for the same customers. If he was going to a direct competitor I imagine he'd say so, because that's a whole different ball of fur.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    3. Re:See this situation before... by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      This looks like the typical situation of company A trying to fuck over company B, just when company B is about to release a product.

      It's possible but that they'd also just happen to be in this guy's neighborhood decreases the odds considerably that this is what's going on.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    4. Re:See this situation before... by dcollins · · Score: 1

      "I'd stay until the project is complete - explain that to company B. If they don't appreciate that, then they don't really want you that badly."

      Not terrible, but the problem is, what if the project runs long with delays? If you don't set a hard leave-date with company A, then the project might run indefinitely long, and you'll wind up burning goodwill with company B. But if you do inform and set a far-out deadline with company A, then that can cause a bad political situation there (or they may just tell you to stop coming in immediately, I've seen that happen).

      --
      We know where leadership by an anti-intellectual "strongman" who scapegoats minorities and likes boisterous rallies goes
  30. Bargain by Geoffrey.landis · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Tell your current company about the offer, and see if you get a counter-offer.

    (and if they don't counter, you know how you're valued. Leave.)

    --
    http://www.geoffreylandis.com
    1. Re:Bargain by jellomizer · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The problem is if they match their offer. Then they feel like that you now owe them one. And you will not get your raise or promotion anytime soon. Or they will now expect much greater things from you. Overall it is better to take the new offer and put in your notice. That way you leave on good terms, and don't do anything to disrupt the terms you are in.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    2. Re:Bargain by Anrego · · Score: 2

      (and if they don't counter, you know how you're valued. Leave.)

      Or more commonly, they can't afford it.

      This tends to be the problem, as was said, companies grow slower than employees. Eventually the employee is worth more than the company can pay.

    3. Re:Bargain by Verdatum · · Score: 2

      This is woefully true. I had a coworker try this technique. He got the match, but afterwards the company was pretty bitter towards him.

    4. Re:Bargain by Aazzkkimm · · Score: 1

      This is very poor advise. Many companies have a "no bargaining" policy, and even if they do, you'll still probably leave within 6 months.

      The OP would also have to ask for significantly more than 7k to stay (time = money).

      --
      Desire is not an occupation.
    5. Re:Bargain by delinear · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Agreed. If you take a counter offer and stay, the chances are those relationships that were previously good may well turn sour. The company may also see you as disloyal or a risk and they'll likely seek to recruit/promote someone over you as soon as possible to minimise the risk of you leaving. Once they've done that, it's actually in their interests if you leave, since they don't want to be paying two lead developers if one is all they need - at that point, welcome to being lumbered with all the crap tasks. This isn't always the case, but I've seen it happen enough that I wouldn't take the risk.

      Conversely leaving isn't disloyal, it's just natural - if they'd hold grudges agains you for wanting to move forwards then that gives you a good indication of how they really view you - fairweather friends at best. Be open and honest and do whatever you can to ease the transition (when I've been in this position before I've made it clear I was on the end of the phone for transitional issues after I've gone so long as they didn't abuse the offer) but be firm, and it probably helps if you make it clear this is not just about money but about expanding your experience/skills/better work/life balance etc (even if it is about money, you don't want to be seen as a mercenary dick - it's a small world after all). Of course, I'm biased as I hate any kind of commute - I'd probably take a 7k pay cut if I could work in walking distance from home rather than 1.5 hours :)

    6. Re:Bargain by Aladrin · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That's really risky proposition. The problem is that they might give you the raise to keep you... While they train your replacement. Then you've lost your current job and don't have another one lined up.

      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    7. Re:Bargain by unrtst · · Score: 2

      Sort of... it's all in the way it's portrayed.

      If you come right out and say "someone else is offering me more money. GIve me a big raise or I'm leaving.", then you'll sound like an ass and like your trying to extort money from them.

      However, try explaining to them why you are worth more, and request a raise, and don't mention the other job, and you won't be taken as if you're trying to hold them hostage. Don't make threats to leave - they could make similar threats to you to fire you all throughout your employment, and you wouldn't have liked that or put up with it. If they give you enough that you feel happy being there still, great... keep that job (IMO, it doesn't have to be as much as the next company is offering if I'm actually happy with my current job, cause that happiness has a HUGE value, and the other job is an unknown).

      All that said, the poster said the old job was 45min away, and the new job is at his front door. I'm lazy. I'd take that new job. You can do the same number of hours of work at the new job with about 20% less time devoted to the job (travel time). Bonus - you can go home for lunch and grill a steak.

    8. Re:Bargain by CrispyZorro · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Tell your current company about the offer, and see if you get a counter-offer.

      Do not do this! This is terrible advice. As an IT manager, I would be pissed if someone came to me with leverage. Being forced to make a decision is not pleasant. I would much rather have the employee come to me with a business case for giving him or her a raise. If I am worth my pay, I know what the resource is worth and will come up with the raise if I can and it is within my budget. Do not accept any stalling tactics as you could lose both opportunities.

      One other thing to consider is that managers will reduce cost if pressured to do so. If you are expensive and seen as replaceable with minimum impact, you will be replaced. It is rare that loyalty (reverse to what you discussed) is given in that situation.

    9. Re:Bargain by black6host · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I once worked at a company and received a job offer with considerably higher pay. I put in my notice, and they offered to match it. Same story so far, however, there were no repercussions or bad feelings. Note: I didn't ask them to counter the offer, I simply said that the opportunity was too good to pass up and that I had to leave. The value of "something" is what people are willing to pay for it. In my opinion, this includes my skill set as well.

      I've managed many developers and my advice to them was that if they received a better offer they should go for it. I was more concerned for them, personally, than the company I worked for. Upper management controlled pay rates but they did not control my concern and care for those that worked for/with me. Of course, this was good for morale and benefited the company in the long run.

      That all being said, it could go either way. The outcome of how one might be treated depends on many things and is unique in most/all cases.

    10. Re:Bargain by tripleevenfall · · Score: 3, Informative

      In IT, you can't generally advance within a company as well as you can by switching companies. This is because a company with a current employee has (short-sighted, self-serving) incentive to minimize the increases in total compensation, while a hiring company must attract the person they want.

      It's also been studied that most people who accept counter offers to stay are still gone within 6 months to a year.

      You are but a resource to your company. If they thought it would save them a few units of your favorite currency in the long run, they'd fire you yesterday. They don't feel any human attachment to you. This is all just business. You work, and at the end of the week they pay you, and then you're even. You don't owe them and they don't owe you. Do what's best for you and your family.

    11. Re:Bargain by Verdatum · · Score: 1

      Good point. I guess it really depends on the company.

    12. Re:Bargain by Rogue974 · · Score: 1

      I can't remember where the study was (sorry, can't post it), but they did a study once and it is like 65-75% of people who get the better offer and renegotiate leave within a year afterwards anyway.

      If you were leaving because you didn't like the place, you still don't like it and just look for another new job.

      If you like it and are happy, like mentioned, they look at you differerntly, your next raise sucks, etc and then either they want you to leave, or you get upset later anyway.

      The only real way to get your wages to where they should be is at review time and have them realize it and give you the bump as part of that process. Then everyone feels good and you can progress. That is hard because you don't have the job offer to hit them in the head with, but as I mentioned, if you have to hit them in the head, it usually doesn't end up working in the end anyway. There are excepetions, but odds are you will end up leaving soon anyway.

    13. Re:Bargain by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      All that said, the poster said the old job was 45min away, and the new job is at his front door. I'm lazy. I'd take that new job. You can do the same number of hours of work at the new job with about 20% less time devoted to the job (travel time). Bonus - you can go home for lunch and grill a steak.

      Don't forget, the downside is that when you take a sick day, they'll be able to see if you leave your house. More seriously, also it's a lot easierfor your boss to say "just pop round for a bit and go home later if you're still unwell" when you don't have a long commute as an excuse.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    14. Re:Bargain by InlawBiker · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If you leave everybody benefits. You gain a better commute, better pay and more opportunity. The old company's two junior programmers will benefit from new responsibility. The company will survive just fine without you believe it or not. If they really need you perhaps they can pay you a small retainer to consult for a few months.

      Bottom line, don't ever hold yourself back.

    15. Re:Bargain by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      And he was being forced to stay there? I mean, he could always leave once he realized how everyone's attitude changed. Not to the same job but at least he could expect a higher salary than before in a different place.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    16. Re:Bargain by magarity · · Score: 1

      This is very poor advise. Many companies have a "no bargaining" policy

      Is this a UK thing? WTF is a "no bargaining" policy? Every employee bargains to get as high a salary and benefit as possible and every employer bargains to pay as little salary as possible. This is called the labor market and is what allows the company that's trying to hire him to offer more that what he's getting now.

    17. Re:Bargain by DJRumpy · · Score: 1

      Can't agree with this more. As to the situation in general, I would have to suggest that you ask the company with the new offer if they are willing to allow you any additional time to transition. Make sure they understand you do not want to leave your existing employer in a lurch. Although it may be an inconvenience, your new employer will often see this loyalty in a good light (as they should). Most are willing to give you additional time for such reasons.

      If they are not flexible, then I would turn in your notice, notify your current employer that you will make any necessary effort to help ease the transition, and you could also offer to continue to assist for a short time after you leave but during your off hours (for example, where do I find, how was this setup, etc type questions). As long as you clearly define the limits of when it is acceptable for them to contact you, and for how long. I would not ask for a counter offer. If they offer one and it seems reasonable, then go from there, but do not burn bridges with a 'gimme' attitude when not necessary. You may find the new employer looks too good on the surface for a reason.

    18. Re:Bargain by tbannist · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That's bad advice, you never take the counter-offer. Once you've admitted to considering an offer from another company you are now branded disloyal. Your boss will make sure he has someone else who can do your job ready for when you leave and if you don't leave soon enough they'll get tired of waiting and kick you out.

      It's a bad risk to take because it usually means you end up with neither job. It's better to explain to the new company that your current company is at a critical juncture and find out how much leeway you have on starting date, if they can give you an extra week or two you can offer that to your current company. But make it clear that your are doing this because you are awesome. If they offer you more money to stay it's either because they're afraid to lose you right now, or because they intentionally underpaid you previously. Eitehr way it's not good.

      --
      Fanatically anti-fanatical
    19. Re:Bargain by networkBoy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Loyalty has paid off *very* well for me. Not in the short run mind you, but when it really counted (twice).
      First time:
      Stayed in a not very good job, for a very good manager, just because he asked me to. Once the project I was on was done he gave me an excellent professional reference and I went on my way. FF about 8 years and I was facing being laid off in the division of the company I moved to. He found out that I was in a group that was busy imploding as fast as it possibly could and hired me into his division, no questions asked.
      Couple years later he's climbed up the ladder quite a bit (as have I) and I found myself in an environment where I knew I was going to get myself into trouble (incompatible middle manager). Went to my old boss and had an "open door" meeting with him. Laid out my issue and told him that same as last time I'd finish the project I was on, but then it looked as if it was time for me to move on again. His response was to move me under a different manager, in a different job role, with a different position, just to make me happy and keep me there.

      I can't help but to think that had I not stayed around way back when, and had bailed at a critical juncture, things would be much worse right now.

      I think the main thing people miss, is that if you have a good relationship with your boss and upper management, while you can not count on that for more pay (never seen someone not burned on that front), you can count on them for fixing almost everything else, making the environment, and job you do, so enjoyable that pay is not important any more.*
      -nB

      * obviously it is important, but there is a range of pay that applies to any job, if the job is awesome and the environment is awesome, then being at the lower end or middle of that range really isn't a big deal.

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    20. Re:Bargain by Garridan · · Score: 1

      Alternately, just ask for a raise to match / beat the amount offered by the other company. Don't tell them about the other offer. If you get the raise, cool, stick around another while. Otherwise, kick rocks.

    21. Re:Bargain by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      The only time I've seen this work is when you show/tell them your offer, and tell them you're declining it (without asking for a bump). This only works if you are friendly with management. It's a not so subtle hint that you are worth more, but would rather stay where you are. Never seen an outright match with this approach, but I have seen "adjustments" to reviews that indicate management was paying attention.

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    22. Re:Bargain by magarity · · Score: 4, Insightful

      As an IT manager ... Being forced to make a decision is not pleasant

      The headliner on the list of job duties for "manager" is "making decisions". Perhaps you need to go back to technical work?

      . I would much rather have the employee come to me with a business case for giving him or her a raise

      The job market indicates this person is worth more by evidence of his new offer; it's up to you as a manager to make the case that you do or do not need to pay that increased amount for this person/skillset/experience level. It's not his problem that the market views his value as increased!

    23. Re:Bargain by Aazzkkimm · · Score: 1

      He managed to get an offer somehow, and it probably didn't come out of the blue. That means applications and interviews. If you're putting in that effort, then you've already committed to leaving.

      --
      Desire is not an occupation.
    24. Re:Bargain by wwphx · · Score: 1

      I have stayed friends with many people in companies that I have left. The 7,000 pounds is a heck of a raise, but personally I would value regaining an hour and a half of my day as an equally big advantage.

      Loyalty to an employer is no longer an admirable trait (usually) as has been demonstrated time and again over the last couple of decades. If you don't have a financial interest or investment in the company, i.e. stock options/shares/whatever, you're not tied to its success or failure. Loyalty is your feelings to a company, a company does not have feelings and doesn't care much about you one way or another. The smaller the company is, that may change, but fundamentally we all are cogs.

      --
      When you sympathize with stupidity, you start thinking like an idiot.
    25. Re:Bargain by Trails · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Agreed, sorta.

      If you play brinksmanship with the company, you poison the relationship.

      I was in a similar situation though the other offer was lot more money but a slightly worse working condition. I approached my boss, told him about it, that I was conflicted, and pointed to some problems in the company. The company was a startup and not yet flush with cash so I told them upfront I didn't expect them to match the pay, and I just wanted to make an informed decision. I got a smallish salary bump, but some organizational issues got resolved and my boss had the ammo to say "our key guy is gonna split if we don't address this". In the end the company got better and I got most of what I wanted. More money would have been nice, but the company is a much improved place to work at, I'm happier for it, and have additional trust in my boss.

      The lesson I took from this is as follows: if you trust your boss, lay it out for them, including what you want. Don't play the "do this or I'll leave" card, or you may as well leave. Give them your POV and make it a discussion, not a negotiation. This hinges on you trusting your boss and being prepared to make compromises. If you aren't prepared to make compromise (which is fine), just leave. If you don't trust your boss enough to do this, just leave.

    26. Re:Bargain by Dragon+Bait · · Score: 1

      In IT, you can't generally advance within a company as well as you can by switching companies. This is because a company with a current employee has (short-sighted, self-serving) incentive

      To butcher a famous quote: Never attribute to malice what can be adequately explained by laziness.

      Most companies have a single time of year where they divvy up a pay pool among all the employees -- and everyone gets roughly the the same raise. What they fail to understand is that people on the personal growth end of their career usually deserve bigger raises than people who just turn the crank.

      Do what's best for you and your family.

      Absolutely. If you don't do that, no one else will.

    27. Re:Bargain by Verdatum · · Score: 1

      He did leave pretty soon after, and he did get a much higher salary :)

    28. Re:Bargain by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Tough shit IT manager. Bet you love having leverage yourself.

      The real reason to jump is that bosses make judgements regarding raises based on the memory of how cheap you once were. In other words you want to get the $$ coming in the door as it will make all subsequent raises easier.

      Also if they pay you more they will value your advice more (basic psych). I will never again take a job where they don't pay me enough to take my advice.

      When I was starting I took the entire departments 'raise budget' for two years running. My asshole boss told all my cow-orkers that I was the reason they were not getting raises. I looked em square in the eye and told they to 'grow a pair. The raise they gave me alone was more then their "raise budget", it's nobodies fault but your own if you don't bring any leverage into the review.'

      I stayed there an additional 3 years. Everybody understands negotiations. As long you you are honest I've never had it leave bad feelings that mattered. It helps to be the best programmer on the staff.

      If the boss is shallow enough to resent the fact you are not a doormat, you are still better off with a resume that shows good raise history.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    29. Re:Bargain by mooingyak · · Score: 1

      Tell your current company about the offer, and see if you get a counter-offer.

      (and if they don't counter, you know how you're valued. Leave.)

      My own policy for that is unless the guy is one of a handful of people in the world who can do the job, don't make counter offers. Money can be a factor, but it's rarely the sole reason someone is looking to leave, and for the ones who it IS the sole reason, they'll usually approach you about the situation before looking elsewhere. For everyone else, it's a combination of things like travel time, office politics, what they get to work on, etc. in addition to money. The money is the only easily fixable item on the list, and if they're not happy with the rest, giving them more money isn't going to fix it.

      There will always be exceptions and you handle each case as it comes to you, but the situations where making a counter offer is a good idea are few and far between.

      --
      William of Ockham had no beard. The most likely explanation is that it was chewed off by squirrels every morning.
    30. Re:Bargain by Bucky24 · · Score: 1

      My asshole boss told all my cow-orkers that I was the reason they were not getting raises.

      Was he wrong? You don't say if you demanded these raises or not, but regardless I doubt your attitude won you many friends at the workplace.

      --
      All the world's a CPU, and all the men and women merely AI agents
    31. Re:Bargain by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Exactly!

      And they outsource part of the work already, how much loyalty would they really exhibit themselves?

    32. Re:Bargain by pspahn · · Score: 1

      Maybe Michael Lewis needs to write a book about this.

      Moneycode?

      --
      Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
    33. Re:Bargain by s73v3r · · Score: 1

      I think your story isn't so much about being "loyal" as it is making sure not to burn any bridges. You took care to leave while still on very good terms (the fact you had an understanding and good boss also helped), and so later, they didn't remember you flipping everyone off and Xeroxing your buttocks, but they remembered you as being a hard worker and a professional. That point is very important to make.

    34. Re:Bargain by barc0001 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That's a very different circumstance. In your cases you weren't being loyal to a company but to a person who reciprocates, which is just good networking.

    35. Re:Bargain by s73v3r · · Score: 1

      If they can't afford it in outright cash, but they still want you on board, they might still try to get you extra compensation in other ways. More time off, more telecommuting time, etc.

    36. Re:Bargain by s73v3r · · Score: 1

      Well, you can attempt to bargain all you want. Doesn't mean that the company is going to listen.

    37. Re:Bargain by s73v3r · · Score: 4, Insightful

      As an IT manager, I would be pissed if someone came to me with leverage.

      Because you want your underlings to have no power at all at the bargaining table, right? You need all the power for yourself. How dare they try to balance that out a bit.

    38. Re:Bargain by s73v3r · · Score: 2

      The headliner on the list of job duties for "manager" is "making decisions".

      That just means he has to make them. It doesn't mean that they have to be pleasant to make.

    39. Re:Bargain by barc0001 · · Score: 1

      The new employer's flexibility is actually a good "sniff test". Unless they have a really compelling reason like the OP is being hired to start a new critical project that has to be on time, most places would be willing to be flexible. If they aren't and the OP can't figure out a reasonable explanation for their inflexibility then that could be a sign of how the new company is going to be to deal with in general.

    40. Re:Bargain by rwa2 · · Score: 1

      Yep. I was pretty much in exactly the same situation as the OP. I'm still good friends with all of my old cohorts. In fact, maybe even better now that I don't have to talk shop and deliverables with them whenever we run into each other :-P

      Your old company will get by. Maybe not as well as when you were there, but they'll manage to hold it together somehow. And they'll be stronger for it. They should not be reliant on one or even two key people (they really should try to keep their "truck number" higher than that, and devs need to share responsibility, understanding, and maintainability of their codebase with others).

      If you're really that critical, they could pay you to consult part time until they get their new stars trained up to snuff. But that's pretty much the worst case scenario. Your friends will want you to succeed and go on and get other experience in life, and 7 years is more than enough to dedicate to one company these days.

    41. Re:Bargain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      [[If you play brinksmanship with the company, you poison the relationship.]]

      I have *never* seen a company of any size that wouldn't do exactly this with their workers whenever they felt it was necessary to trim their costs.

      Company loyalty is a one-way street. The worker is expected to be loyal because the people they work with are a community, and there are personal relationships and personal harm that could be done. But "the company" is the one that lays people off, or suspends payraises for a couple years because there are a lot of other developers looking for work.

      So you get a competing offer for more money and 10 less unpaid hours commuting per week, and you're supposed to stay there?

      The only hard part I see about this is that it's typically very difficult to make sure you've got the new job guaranteed before going to your current employer and telling them what they'll have to pay to match your offer. (The commuting cost needs to be made up with money.) There's always the risk that the new employer changes their mind and won't hire you, unless you've already got a contract from them in which case they'll be real pissy if you tell them that *after* you interviewed and told them you'd accept their offer and got an offer letter, you went back to your current employer and gave them a chance to match it.

      I know some people who work in the legal field, not software, and they tell me it's different over there - all part of the game. Not sure if things seem different in software because "that's software" or if it's just me.

      My most helpful advice would be that if you want to be loyal, you can ask the prospective future employer to give you a few months to help your current employer prepare for your departure. They might be in too much of a hurry to accomodate that, but it's also possible they could look at that and see a worker who values more about his company than just the dollars (and commute), and you're giving them an opportunity to hire that guy.

    42. Re:Bargain by ILongForDarkness · · Score: 1

      My work is this way (Canada). They have things in pay trenches. In order to get paid more you have to have more experience. So it doesn't matter if you are crazy skilled if you haven't say published/patented somthing and have the required 5yrs with the company you don't get the raise period full stop. Don't like it go somewhere else. Admittedly I work in the public sector but still very frustrating to be the go to guy for things and be clearly more skilled than people in your trench but still be denied a raise.

    43. Re:Bargain by Tepic++ · · Score: 3, Informative

      What was expected? Loyalty to a company is meaningless as the company is not anthropomorphic. It's always your relationships/loyalty to people that counts.

      The relationships that really work are also far more than networking - they are not just business transactions.

    44. Re:Bargain by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      I bike to work every day. The counter-offer would have to be much larger. My yearly savings for replacing my 7 mile one way commute with a bike ride is on the order of $5k-$8k due to gas prices, insurance prices (30% discount!), maintenance, and of course general vehicle life. I've eliminated 95% of my driving--grocery store is within 1mi, light rail 1/3mi and takes me to a BETTER grocery store 16 miles away for cheaper than gas, there's also a huge commerce center 3 miles away. I'm also in better shape, and it takes me like 5-10 minutes longer to get to and from work (33-40 minute drive median 40, 39-55 minute bike ride median 45). More utility and less time investment than a gym membership, as well as a net savings instead of paying $50-$100 every month.

      By putting this guy closer to work, he would have:

      • A time savings: 1.5 hours becomes 0.5 hours--1 hour a day--if his commute is now 15 minutes, a good 5 hours a week or 12.5% that I'd demand compared as a benefit valued at time-and-a-half (job-related time cost, adds on to my 40 hours, so to me the value is 50% more than my normal pay)
      • Money savings: Much less wear and tear on the car, less maintenance, less fuel, reduced insurance
      • Possible alternate benefits: if it's a few miles, he can bike over to work about as fast as he can drive (I manage it with ungodly hills to climb both ways). This means minimal added time investment for non-quantifiable but tangible health benefits
      • Possible lifestyle benefits: IF you can bike to work, you can probably make bicycling a large alternate transportation part of your lifestyle--which means you quickly figure out how to feasibly and comfortably live as a one-car family (if/when you get married and have kids), which you can then decide for or against as a lifestyle (it depends on how you feel about biking, really)

      I would leave the last one out of any negotiations, as it's too fuzzy. However, the salary and time savings would be directly on the table--a raise of $7k and then 18.75% of the resulting salary would provide the direct financial basis. The car use savings would be calculated by comparing the distance, dividing out the fuel cost, and then dividing that by your current after-taxes bracket--if you pay 33% in taxes, divide all that shit by 0.67 and you'll see what your savings would be. If you're going to bicycle to work, you'd do the same except instead of comparing the distance you'd just flatly use your work commute distance (your new daily commute wear and tear on your car is $0).

      All things considered, he could put up a lot more than $7k for a $7k raise (yes I know, it's British and more like $12k; ignore, this is conceptual). Say he makes $60k and got $7k. Now he makes $67k. With his commute reduced by 1 hour a day, 5/40 being 1/8 or 12.5%, time and a half giving 12.5% * 1.5 = 18.75%, that's another $12,562.50/year. If we call the savings on his car expenses $5k/year (a low estimate, including reduced wear and tear stretching out vehicle life and thus resulting in more years of use for the same cash, thus lower annualized purchase costs), and his tax rate 33%, we'll call that $7,462.69.

      That means his $7k raise represents a small piece of a total $27,025.19 increase to give him the same available benefit per year, including time. $18,106.88 after taxes. That's their matched offer. What he can get in terms of raw money (i.e. ignoring the $12,562.50 from his time compensation) is $9,690 after taxes, or a $14,462.69 raise.

      Basically, you won't improve your FINANCIAL situation here by more than $14,462.69/year salary increase. Your LIFE situation (given the basis and raise I provided) is improved by an equivalent of a $27,025.19 raise total--if they give you any less than that, they're not matching the offer.

    45. Re:Bargain by Geoffrey.landis · · Score: 1

      Loyalty has paid off *very* well for me. Not in the short run mind you, but when it really counted (twice)...
      Stayed in a not very good job, for a very good manager, just because he asked me to.

      I will agree: loyalty to a company may be misplaced, but loyalty to a person is often repaid.

      --
      http://www.geoffreylandis.com
    46. Re:Bargain by Quince+alPillan · · Score: 2

      This.

      Also, if you DO decide to leave and the old company can't fix their problems, offer to stick around longer than normal.

      Typically, you'll give two weeks notice to the old company when you change positions. Offer them a month or two months notice to make the transition for the junior developers smoother. Your new company will like that you feel loyalty to your old company (they'll see that you'll be loyal to them in return) and your old company won't have hard feelings once you explain your issues.

      If the new company can't accept not being able to bring you on board right away, or your old company will be bitter at you for leaving no matter what, you probably don't want to be with them anyway.

    47. Re:Bargain by SomePgmr · · Score: 1

      The smaller the company is, that may change, but fundamentally we all are cogs.

      Very true. I've always worked for small companies, and it has a lot to do with not feeling like another number on a spreadsheet. I've never been let go from a company because someone was looking to increase margins. I've never had to fear "the people upstairs", or had to think about someone gunning for my job.

      The trade-offs are big ones though. I make way less than most people like me. There have never been any financial ways for me to invest in the company outside of my salary (they're small and privately owned). I have to make an effort to get along with everyone who works for the company. You can't avoid people and you ultimately answer to everyone. And when someone calls me with a problem at midnight, I pick up the phone. If necessary, I drop what I'm doing and drive to work. There is no such thing as, "that's not my job". If I'm walking through a building and see garbage on the floor, I pick it up. If I'm the guy that knows how to fix a light fixture, I do it. I don't go home at 5 just because it's 5. There are no management positions to move in to one day, and I don't sit around feeling bad for myself because I don't make much.

      It's a different world, but I chose this. And unless my situation became desperate, I wouldn't have it any other way.

    48. Re:Bargain by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Yes, I 'demanded' the raises. Yes he was wrong. Their 'raise budget' was arbitrary, they blew it off for me without hesitation. I wasn't there to make friends. Doormats make lousy friends anyhow.

      I game them very good advice, not my fault if they didn't have the balls to execute.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    49. Re:Bargain by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      besides, 7 hours a week is priceless. 7 * 52 = 364 mores hours per year for your family and life. Pretty much a no-brainer, pay aside.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    50. Re:Bargain by gujo-odori · · Score: 1

      This is terrible advice. If you do this, many/most (maybe all) of your managers and colleagues will view this as extortion, and the new company will view it as your having played them in order to wring a raise out of your current employer. Either take the job, or don't.

      Now, with respect to the loyalty angle, I understand how you feel. Most of us would feel the same, I think. Certainly, I would. However, I also know that I've survived two rounds of layoffs in the past three years, and I'm sure the people laid off were all loyal employees, as I am. Should the economy double-dip and force us into another round of layoffs, I may or may not make the cut a third time. My loyalty would count for nothing, that's for sure. I'm not looking around because I'm happy with my job, my employer, my pay, and my work location is a very short commute from my house. However, if I were looking around - whether it was simply a matter of money, or whether it was other issues - I would suppress my loyalty and do what I had to do. While my employer is "loyal" to its employees, those who were laid off have at least themselves to support, and many have families to support as well. The company's loyalty does not extend to keeping them on just because they need to support themselves; the company will do what it believes it needs to do in order to further what it perceives as its best interests/survival.

      So should you.

      Be a loyal employee while you work there, but if you feel its time to move on and the opportunity to do so is in front of you, then make the decision that you believe is in your own best interests. Loyal employees do this all the time.

    51. Re:Bargain by Ant2 · · Score: 1

      How loyal is your current company to you?

      If the role's were reversed and they had an opportunity to hire a more qualified person for less money than they pay you, would they? What if that employee lived next door to the office? And [hypothetically] knew more about the product than you? Would they feel such tremendous loyalty?

      If so, then stick with them. Companies like that are hard to find.

    52. Re:Bargain by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      He should move take the offer, nobody watches out for you and yours, but your and yours.
      I would consider giving a longer notice, maybe 1 month instead of 2 weeks if the new company was ok with that.
      I would also consider doing some after hours consulting for the old company at a reasonable rate if it is short term. Rate needs to ramp up after the short term so they have an incentive to get their shit together instead of leaning on you.

    53. Re:Bargain by Omnifarious · · Score: 1

      The only hard part I see about this is that it's typically very difficult to make sure you've got the new job guaranteed before going to your current employer and telling them what they'll have to pay to match your offer. (The commuting cost needs to be made up with money.) There's always the risk that the new employer changes their mind and won't hire you, unless you've already got a contract from them in which case they'll be real pissy if you tell them that *after* you interviewed and told them you'd accept their offer and got an offer letter, you went back to your current employer and gave them a chance to match it.

      The commuting cost does not have to be made up with money. The commuting cost could be made up for any number of ways. An agreement to let you telecommute would be an example.

    54. Re:Bargain by kbdd · · Score: 1
      That is good advice. Trying to get a raise by threatening to quit is at best a short term game. If it works and they give you a raise, you will be last in line for the next raise because they will feel that you got something you did not deserve by taking advantage of circumstances. If it does not work and you quit over it, forget about working there again, and if they turn you down and you stay anyway, you will be their slave.

      Explain that you like the job and the company, but that the other offer is simply too good to ignore. Point out factors other than just salary, like the shorter commute and the fact that it is a larger company, because they cannot match that. It will make them feel a little better because it won't be just about money. Wish them good luck and shake hands.

      Don't forget that when that company will no longer need you, it will take about 50 microseconds for them to write your marching papers.

    55. Re:Bargain by SirSpammenot · · Score: 1

      I took a $10K(USD) cut: $5K for cutting a 25 minute drive down a tollway that costs me $600/yr to a 2.1mile door to door "commute". Bicycling to work ROCKS. And another $5K discount to work with under a particular manager that I had worked with before. That was 3 yrs ago when the company was starting off, now we are peers, and the company just got acquired by the largest competitor in the field. I have no complaints.

      So - his loyalty (to his workers) engendered similar loyalty in turn (to him). I wouldn't have sacrificed the pay cut for just anyone. Everyone benefited from it. And oh yes, I got that $10K added back to my salary within 2 yrs. I would do that again.

      But despite the fact loyalty does work... that doesn't seem to be the position you are in. Right? If you can leave cleanly, do it. They will survive just fine and you will be remembered as the miracle worker that built it from scratch.

      --
      1 Dachshund + 1 Dachshunds = A Paradox.
    56. Re:Bargain by Cephas+Aurelius · · Score: 1

      That's a very different circumstance. In your cases you weren't being loyal to a company but to a person who reciprocates, which is just good networking.

      This is an important distinction. Organizations cannot return loyalty. People can. People who care about you will want what is best for you and not only think about the companies needs. Those people may work to keep you, but it is the people not the organization that make the effort.

      Talk to your manager. If his/her first response is about the company and not about you, leave. You have made a simple attribution error in assuming extended proximity and a friendly work environment equates to loyalty.

      If your manager's first response is about you then talk it out. Tell them why this is better for you. Communicate your concerns about asking for a counter-offer (well defined above). Most every day at a job is about the company, with the exception of when your paycheck arrives, when you get a raise or are disciplined, and days like this. If they cannot make an effort then you know where you stand.

      Do not take this over your bosses head. If he/she is competent and cares/returns your loyalty, then he/she will do that for you. If not, then the senior managers you feel loyalty for have not filled their side of the implicit contract and anything you do will undermine your boss who you will have to work for afterwards. If you give notice and they go around your boss to try to keep you, then that is a problem too. I cannot cover every edge case, but you see where I am going.

      Oh, and you are eminently replaceable. They may have to spend more money to get someone who can do your job (sometimes hiring two people to cover your duties). They may have to move deadlines or change scope on their project to get it out without you. If it is true that "You can't leave, the company will fail" then someone has not done basic risk mitigation and that isn't a company that will be around for you to be loyal to in a year. I have worked for companies that saw 100% turnover in developers and survived just fine.

    57. Re:Bargain by Cephas+Aurelius · · Score: 1

      I would also consider doing some after hours consulting for the old company at a reasonable rate if it is short term.

      Give them a rate 1.5 to 2X your new hourly rate (translated from your new jobs salary if needed). Otherwise you are working for less than it cost to keep you on. Also realize that this can turn into the long tail from hell and result in loss of that loyalty you value when (not if) there is a miscommunication in what you offered vs what they THINK you offered.

    58. Re:Bargain by wwphx · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a nice way to work and one that gives you a lot of respect and self-worth, definitely valuable intangibles. I've spent most of my working life in the government sector. We're also underpaid compared to peers, but there's usually a better amount of job security. I have worked in small companies before, the smallest shop I worked in was my first: a realtor, me, and his secretary. It was no where near my best job, but definitely wasn't my worst.

      Funny thing is that the best jobs for me totally depend on the people, and as people change or move on, the job can change from best to "I gotta get out of this place!" I was really frustrated when I quit working at one job after 9 years and my friends said "Good, you haven't been happy there for a long time." Yet they never told me what they had noticed, and it took a crisis for me to finally decide that I'd had enough.

      --
      When you sympathize with stupidity, you start thinking like an idiot.
    59. Re:Bargain by Cephas+Aurelius · · Score: 1

      Also, if you DO decide to leave and the old company can't fix their problems, offer to stick around longer than normal.

      If they can't fix their problems then they probably are going to have problems paying you real quick.

    60. Re:Bargain by Cephas+Aurelius · · Score: 1

      This is an excellent option with one exception. You become the guy that is never around because he is using his special time off, or the guy that never takes his time off. Also most accounting rules require that you book time off as a expense just as if they had paid you.

      The telecommuting could work if you value that, but then you have the 'special' problem every week as opposed to every couple of months.

    61. Re:Bargain by godefroi · · Score: 1

      It's terrible advice. The only thing worse than asking for a counter-offer is accepting one. It proves to your current employer that you can be bought, and therefore cannot be trusted.

      --
      Karma: Poor (Mostly affected by lame karma-joke sigs)
    62. Re:Bargain by shentino · · Score: 1

      Unless the new company's offer isn't solid or falls through after you've put in your notice.

      Then you're screwed.

    63. Re:Bargain by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      You don't put in you notice until you have a firm offer letter.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    64. Re:Bargain by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      Not just IT. Everyone moves up the pay scale by taking new jobs for more money.

    65. Re:Bargain by BrentH · · Score: 1

      I guess bargaining is a US thing then, because here in Europe such things are very rare exceptions. Labour isn't a market in but a very few highly competitive industries.

    66. Re:Bargain by torgis · · Score: 1

      Seriously? Is anyone at your current company under the illusion that you would not leave for a high enough offer? People can pretend all they want, but the reality is that your current employer bought you from your previous employer. Every new person they hire, they are hiring away from another company, likely at a higher rate. What's the big surprise here? Of course your skills are for sale - that's why you're working. If they are not willing to pay market value for your skills then move on.

      I suppose I'm rather baffled by the whole logic here; what, then, should he do? Refuse the current job offer and stay where he's at, but keep it a secret? How does that prove loyalty at all? Nobody knows about it. Or he could refuse the current job offer and then tell his current employer he was offered a job somewhere else but refused. That just sounds needy and pathetic - does that prove loyalty? Or does that prove you're too chickenshit to stand up and ask for a reasonable raise? Or he could man up and explain the situation to his boss. If his boss has a clue and his workplace isn't a hellhole, they might offer him a small raise. If they are hostile to the whole idea, then he's better off quitting and moving on anyway. I've never had a problem discussing stuff like this with my boss, she is intelligent and reasonable and understands that I have bills to pay and a family to feed. I don't work for the love of working, I work because I need a paycheck. If I can get a bigger paycheck by negotiating a little bit, what's the harm in that? If you work at a company that considers something like this untrustworthy, then maybe you should reevaluate the situation.

      Bottom line is anyone can be bought, period. The only question is the price.

    67. Re:Bargain by avandesande · · Score: 1

      It did for me as well- after 9/11 our company had a severe cash crunch, and we had to endure almost a year of no salary increases and our boss periodically holding our checks for a couple of weeks.

      When things normalized a bunch of us got 20% raises.

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    68. Re:Bargain by godefroi · · Score: 1

      Seriously? Is anyone at your current company under the illusion that you would not leave for a high enough offer? People can pretend all they want, but the reality is that your current employer bought you from your previous employer. Every new person they hire, they are hiring away from another company, likely at a higher rate. What's the big surprise here? Of course your skills are for sale - that's why you're working. If they are not willing to pay market value for your skills then move on.

      Yeah, my current employer "bought" me from a call center, over eleven years ago, for $36k. Now, I'm making nearly 3x that salary. I come and go when I please, essentially work on what I feel like working on, and I get to be an asshole and a curmudgeon, and noone can call me on it. There are benefits other than salary.

      I suppose I'm rather baffled by the whole logic here; what, then, should he do? Refuse the current job offer and stay where he's at, but keep it a secret? How does that prove loyalty at all? Nobody knows about it. Or he could refuse the current job offer and then tell his current employer he was offered a job somewhere else but refused. That just sounds needy and pathetic - does that prove loyalty? Or does that prove you're too chickenshit to stand up and ask for a reasonable raise?

      What he ought to do is decide whether working for the new company benefits him more than working for the old company. Whether it's worth giving up the friendships, relationships, intangible benefits, and other goodies he's built up in exchange for the larger salary and the possibility of new intangible benefits down the road. Early this year, I took a new job with a giant financial firm, and while the pay was indeed nice, the working environment was NOT what it was cracked up to be. It was a nightmare, and so I returned here about about 10 weeks. Not everyone would have this opportunity, but in my case, I'm sure glad I did.

          Or he could man up and explain the situation to his boss. If his boss has a clue and his workplace isn't a hellhole, they might offer him a small raise. If they are hostile to the whole idea, then he's better off quitting and moving on anyway. I've never had a problem discussing stuff like this with my boss, she is intelligent and reasonable and understands that I have bills to pay and a family to feed. I don't work for the love of working, I work because I need a paycheck. If I can get a bigger paycheck by negotiating a little bit, what's the harm in that? If you work at a company that considers something like this untrustworthy, then maybe you should reevaluate the situation.

      The problem is that it marks you as someone who's looking for a new job. Even if you get your counter-offer, your employer knows it's merely a matter of time. Those "intangibles" tend to disappear rather quickly at that point. If you're working strictly for a salary, then by all means, go for the counteroffer, but for the rest of us, it's not worth turning our workplace hostile for a little more money.

      This is not just my advice, this is the generally accepted wisdom:

      http://www.forbes.com/2008/06/28/counter-offer-employer-lead-careers-cx_hr_0630counteroffer.html
      http://frugaldad.com/2008/02/05/accepting-company-counter-offer-can-be-risky-move/
      http://www.businessweek.com/careers/content/nov2004/ca2004114_2710_ca009.htm
      http://it.toolbox.com/blogs/it-recruiter/why-you-should-not-accept-a-counter-offer-2359

      --
      Karma: Poor (Mostly affected by lame karma-joke sigs)
    69. Re:Bargain by davek · · Score: 1

      Never ever do this:

      Tell your current company about the offer, and see if you get a counter-offer.

      (and if they don't counter, you know how you're valued. Leave.)

      You're basically threatening your boss. Even if he comes back with a more generous counteroffer, the relationship will be permanently damaged, especially in a small company where you have to work directly with the owner or CEO. I made this very mistake of trying to play hardball with an "at will" position, and watched as my responsibilities were slowly taken away until I was fired a few months later. I was left in a lurch and had to take a job paying far less.

      When dealing with "at will" employment (as the vast majority of us do), it's best to make a decision and stick with it. Don't try and get a bidding war going with the guy currently signing your paycheck.

      --
      6th Street Radio @ddombrowsky
    70. Re:Bargain by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      Organizations cannot return loyalty.

      Of course they can, if they are set up and run in the appropriate manner.

      Clearly, the abstract concept of an organisation cannot feel loyalty in the human sense, but there is nothing inherent in the *general* concept that stops them from rewarding and returning loyalty- if that is the aim of those in charge, and if they are run appropriately.

      Of course, whether a large, profit-driven corporation (one particular type of organisation) will do so is far less likely- though one could argue they should treat loyalty as an asset, this rarely happens.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    71. Re:Bargain by torgis · · Score: 1

      Yeah, my current employer "bought" me from a call center, over eleven years ago, for $36k. Now, I'm making nearly 3x that salary. I come and go when I please, essentially work on what I feel like working on, and I get to be an asshole and a curmudgeon, and noone can call me on it. There are benefits other than salary.

      They enticed you away with a raise, and you stayed because you kept getting fair market value for your service. That was kinda my whole point.

      What he ought to do is decide whether working for the new company benefits him more than working for the old company. Whether it's worth giving up the friendships, relationships, intangible benefits, and other goodies he's built up in exchange for the larger salary and the possibility of new intangible benefits down the road. Early this year, I took a new job with a giant financial firm, and while the pay was indeed nice, the working environment was NOT what it was cracked up to be. It was a nightmare, and so I returned here about about 10 weeks. Not everyone would have this opportunity, but in my case, I'm sure glad I did.

      So, let me get this straight. Talking with your boss about another opportunity could be considered disloyal, but you actually left your current job for a better offer and then came back and you're advising others on what you consider to be company loyalty?

      This is not just my advice, this is the generally accepted wisdom:

      http://www.forbes.com/2008/06/28/counter-offer-employer-lead-careers-cx_hr_0630counteroffer.html

      http://frugaldad.com/2008/02/05/accepting-company-counter-offer-can-be-risky-move/

      http://www.businessweek.com/careers/content/nov2004/ca2004114_2710_ca009.htm

      http://it.toolbox.com/blogs/it-recruiter/why-you-should-not-accept-a-counter-offer-2359

      I would hardly consider these 4 links "accepted wisdom". The first link (Forbes) talks about some guy whose counteroffer was to be the CEO of a major multinational retailer. So what if he only had the job for 3 years? When your salary is $1m per year and you have a golden parachute bailout, 3 years as CEO is plenty of time to rack up some serious cash. It even mentioned that he took an early retirement. Oh, the horror. That sounds like just about the best possible outcome. CEO anecdotes are not really applicable for people working at the "peon" level.

      Second link (frugaldad) is written by Jason (Frugal Dad) on his blog. His anecdote is that he was ready to receive a counteroffer, but he got laid off instead. He then goes on to contradict the belief that counteroffers are indicators of disloyalty in his second paragraph.

      Third link (businessweek) is behind a paywall, or broken.

      Fourth article (it.toolbox) was written by a recruiter who is obviously irritated by people who run through the whole recruitment process (thus wasting his time) and then stay with their current company due to a counter-offer. He ends the article with this:

      "I hope that some of this dialoge hits home because these are some of the most frustrating issues to handle as a recruiter. I think they are all avoidable and can positively impact your career when handled in the right manner. These are principles to live by, like being honest and sticking to your word, and knowing thy self!"

      And I think that speaks volumes. It's not accepted wisdom, it's one recruiter guy giving his opinion.

      Whatever though. Of course, there are intangibles like the people you work with, that atmosphere, perks, and your gene

    72. Re:Bargain by Roachie · · Score: 1

      *Warning* For those using this technique to jerk mo money out of your current employer- BE WARNED- you might just get a "goodbye" lunch instead of a counter-offer.

      I worked with an underachiever-despite-being-quite-experienced guy, who played this game about every year and our employer tended to go along and up his pay. That is, until one day we bought him lunch, a firm slap on the back ,a firm handshake and a 'bon voyage'. We were surprised to see him back at the office afterward... kinda hanging out... waiting for something to happen. Poor slob, the brinkmanship didn't quite pan out. He lasted about 6 months at the next position.. I wondered if it wasbecause he tried the same crap on them.

      --
      This sig is not paradoxical or ironic.
    73. Re:Bargain by mmcuh · · Score: 1

      Someone who doesn't consider an offer from another company, with a much higher salary, is an idiot. I really don't believe that managers expect all employees to be idiots.

    74. Re:Bargain by Builder · · Score: 1

      The UK isn't like that. They can't just decide to get rid of you. We actually have laws to protect humans here.

    75. Re:Bargain by johnlcallaway · · Score: 1

      Like with all things, it depends. I was loyal to one company, and after 7 years they dumped me without warning. No good raises, seems that 'if we give you a raise, then we can't give other people as much' was a common excuse.

      A few years later, I started to work for another company with a great CEO and CTO that I got to know pretty well. Eleven years later and three companies, they were both let go after a buy-out, and I also parted ways since their new interests didn't interest me.

      How did I know I could stay loyal?? They paid me more than I could get elsewhere because they didn't want me to leave. They gave me a lot of freedom to get things done.

      My new boss and I have an agreement, she will never be surprised by my coming into her office and telling her I'm leaving. I've always followed the rule that I make sure the company I'm with knows that I'm expecting something more out of my job so they have an opportunity to correct things. If they don't address things, then they must not care if I stick around that much.

      A couple of weeks ago, she and I had a conversation that went something like this ... "I'm finding it difficult to not start looking for a new job". We talked a bit about the company and other things, and a few days later I told her I decided that the 'three year itch' was gone and to not worry.

      My boss is unique, I wouldn't recommend that with everyone. But if your boss isn't like that, why are even thinking about staying???

      --
      I rarely read replies, it's my opinion and if you thought about your opinion a little more, I'm OK with that.
    76. Re:Bargain by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      So quit sucking the government tit and get an honest job.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    77. Re:Bargain by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Some managers do.

      A certain type of idiot.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    78. Re:Bargain by gallen1234 · · Score: 1

      As an IT manager, I would be pissed if someone came to me with leverage.

      I've never understood this sentiment although I've heard it many times from my father who was a manager for a large part of his career. Why is it okay for management to come to me and say, "We've got some problems with our relationship and, if you don't make some changes, you'll be fired.", but it isn't okay for me to go to management and say, "We've got some problems with our relationship and, if you don't make some changes, I'm going to quit."? Most of the time, management is in a superior bargaining position because it's harder for me to do without a job for a period of time than it is for them to do without someone in my position for a period of time. Would you, as a manager, be reluctant to use that advantage to bring an employ into line with a new set of job requirements that you or senior management felt were necessary?

    79. Re:Bargain by mu51c10rd · · Score: 1

      Usually, getting raises for the team consists of proving their worth to the upper management or finance types. It is not fun. Doable, but certainly not fun. When someone comes to you with the leverage of an offer suddenly, it is difficult knowing you cannot promise anything right away and risk losing the employee. I prefer keeping team cohesiveness, and so do try to improve good performers' situation monetarily when I can. It is more difficult to replace a good employee than retain the ones you have. As a manager, you need to learn the art of convincing the senior management or finance types of your team's value, rather than let them walk out the door.

    80. Re:Bargain by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      It sounds like you work for an amazing company if normal operating procedure is to give raises more than once per year. The company I work for has given me one raise in five years, and I am still at about $5,000 less than what they promised to pay me when I was hired on.
      Also, please note that a cost of living adjustment is not a raise, as that merely maintains your current salary adjusted for inflation. If you do not even get a COLA, then your company is reducing your salary every year.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    81. Re:Bargain by turgid · · Score: 1

      That's a happy ending.

      I've been working for a large (>100k people now) company for 4 years. The first year we got small pay rises. Then for the next three years there was a RIF every year and no pay rises. This year we got 2.7% and sold to an Indian outsourcing company. Peoples' pensions got hammered. Our jobs are going to India and many of us are training our replacement with vague promises of new work for other customers at the end of it. My project is going, lock, stock and barrel, to India. There is no new work yet: the excuse is they can't get us new work while we're still committed to the old work. Ho hum.

      Meanwhile, people across the pond, still working for the old employer are being asked to take substantial pay cuts (up to 50% for the lowest paid!).

      I've worked for smaller companies too. The only difference was the Dickensian attitude to staff motivation. The pay rises were non-existent or very poor, but in addition, they thought that intimidating and threatening the staff would improve output and quality. It just made turnover astronomical. I was there for 2 years and 2 months. The software office had 22-25 people employed over that period. 19 of us left (2 in the month I worked my notice).

      It's all about managers' bonuses and shareholder value.

      On the bright side, pretty soon, most of these companies will be dead (the last one already is). Maybe we will enter a new era where staff are valued?

    82. Re:Bargain by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      I will agree: loyalty to a company may be misplaced, but loyalty to a person is often repaid.

      Yep. I had a job hopping manager once and he pulled me with him to every new job with a substantial pay and skill set increase each time. Eventually, he left, but I didn't (not out of loyalty to the company as much as it was my dream job). Company folded and I wish I had taken that passed up offer to follow him again.

    83. Re:Bargain by dbIII · · Score: 1

      It depends. Very small companies where you can drink with the boss will hang on to you when larger ones would fire you. There's one guy in in my workplace that has been banned from the site of a major client (and it was definitely his fault) and there's not much other work at the moment, and he'll be on various support jobs for the next six months but still on full time and full wages for the next six months. Other places would fire him.
      Other small companies can of course be a living hell where you can't even be sure if you are going to get paid and promotion only happens for members of the bosses family.

    84. Re:Bargain by CrispyZorro · · Score: 1

      As an IT manager, I would be pissed if someone came to me with leverage.

      Because you want your underlings to have no power at all at the bargaining table, right? You need all the power for yourself. How dare they try to balance that out a bit.

      They already have the upper hand before coming to the bargaining table. TFA was about loyalty. Loyalty is injured once your employee starts looking elsewhere. Why threaten your boss with leaving before demonstrating why an out-of-band raise is deserved? Do you go all in on the flop in Texas Hold 'em? After you present your case for a raise and receive an unfavorable response, you can proceed with revealing your job offer. This is the best option for getting what you want without damaging your working relationship.

      And for the record, one reason I would be pissed is that my relationship with my "underlings" (as you called them) was not healthy enough that I knew that they were not satisfied. The other is that people generally think for a while before they start interviewing which means that they were likely dissatisfied for some time. You know, not all bosses are scumbags.

    85. Re:Bargain by ILongForDarkness · · Score: 1

      Hard to do when you work in medicine in a country with universal healthcare. Some tits are tasty and useful.

    86. Re:Bargain by CrispyZorro · · Score: 1

      "We've got some problems with our relationship and, if you don't make some changes, you'll be fired."

      If someone says that to you, you know why they are saying it. That is a last resort and usually comes after significant attempts at counseling.

      Also, I'd have no problem with someone coming to me and say that they are unhappy with some aspect of their work. In fact, my company is well-versed at addressing these issues and will work to come up with a solution. If we cannot solve your problem, then you can deliver your "I'm going to quit line." Yet again, last resort.

      Where the fuck do you guys work?

    87. Re:Bargain by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 1

      Loyalty to an employer is no longer an admirable trait (usually) as has been demonstrated time and again over the last couple of decades.

      Depends on the company. More than a decade ago a friend of mine was offered a new job at something like twice what he was currently earning. He looked at the position he was in now (a decent company to work for, flexible hours, good boss, etc) and never even went for the interview. Ten years later he's still at his original company, and still happy with being there. So there's more to life than money...

    88. Re:Bargain by mgblst · · Score: 1

      Sure, they can't afford it. But upper management all get cars, and are paid 4x. Yet they can't afford an extra 7,000 pounds.

    89. Re:Bargain by jds91md · · Score: 1

      but the offer isn't just money, it's about 1 1/2 hours more with family by dropping the commute. Current company can't offer that, there really is no counter-offer (unless they offer some work-from-home arrangement) -- Josh

    90. Re:Bargain by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      and I am still at about $5,000 less than what they promised to pay me when I was hired on.

      Huh? Wouldn't that amount actually be in an offer letter that you accepted when you took the job?

    91. Re:Bargain by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      light rail 1/3mi and takes me to a BETTER grocery store 16 miles away for cheaper than gas

      Really? How much is light rail? If we say you get 32 MPG (pretty bad), then you'll use one gallon of gas to get to and from the store. That's about $3.85 here in expensive gas CA. You could carry way more home in a car (e.g. from Costco though I know that's not what you meant).. Plus, I thought light rail would cost a lot more than that, both ways.

    92. Re:Bargain by trojjan · · Score: 1

      I have been in this situation. I accepted the counter offer my company gave. In retrospect that was a big mistake. I could no longer work from home. Earlier nobody cared how many hours I put in as long as the work was done but after the 'raise' I would get an email anytime I was at work less than 8 hours and I had to send in a daily report of every action. In addition to the project I was handling I had to mentor 2 junior developers. When my Blackberry died(company provided) it was replaced with the cheapest model, one of the guys working under me had a better model(seems petty but it stings). I ended up leaving 6 months later anyway(there were many other reasons too). So my advise would be if you are getting a better offer, take it.

    93. Re:Bargain by Tom · · Score: 1

      Once you've admitted to considering an offer from another company you are now branded disloyal.

      That's nonsense. Unless the HR people are total idiots, they know that the job market out there means that their people are also getting offers, or hearing from them. Telling them that you've received an interesting offer is a fact of life. If you were actively job-hunting, and they find out, that's a different thing.

      It all depends on how you present the facts. If it sounds like you are looking to leave, that's bad. If it sounds like someone phoned you up and made you a really good offer, that's normal business. The fact that you're telling them alone should clue them in that you're considering taking it. If the offer is considerably better than your current deal, again they would be total idiots to think that's a loyalty issue. Of course, if the difference is small, then it points to a loyalty problem. But if you make a lot more - hello, management are business people, they understand taking the better deal. If you phrase yourself properly in business terms, not forgetting to mention that you have an interest in keeping a good relationship with them, aka leaving on good terms, etc.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    94. Re:Bargain by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

      The job market indicates this person is worth more by evidence of his new offer; it's up to you as a manager to make the case that you do or do not need to pay that increased amount for this person/skillset/experience level. It's not his problem that the market views his value as increased!

      Not really how the job market works, maybe the other company has a terrible reputation and needs to pay more. Maybe they have very bad secondary benefits.

      To get back on track, 7k is not worth leaving a job over. I presume it is per year after all, an pre-taxes. So it means each month he might get a few hundred extra, big deal. He basically got to ask himself, where do I get the best shot at a salary increase of 70k in the not to distant future. That is the kind of money that gets interesting.

      Why is this guy considering leaving for a tiny increase just as the a small companies flag ship product is about to launch? 7k shouldn't do it unless he has been feeling undervalued for a long time. That is the problem when you start considering your managers as friends, they get the bigger bonus the lower they keep your salary.

      I wouldn't leave for a small salary increase but being underpaid or for that matter an annoying commute, that would do it.

      --

      MMO Quests are like orgasms:

      You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    95. Re:Bargain by Geminii · · Score: 1

      Ask the larger company to initially rent you back to the smaller company four days a week until the smaller company makes the decision that your ongoing worth to them is not sufficient to keep paying your contract rates.

      This has the following advantages:
      1) You get a higher rate of pay immediately;
      2) You are immediately profitable to the larger company;
      3) The decision as to when is the best time for you to wrap up at the smaller company is made by the smaller company and not you;
      4) You still have one day a week to bring yourself up to speed with the environment and people at the larger company, so that when you finish up at the smaller company you can hit the ground running at the larger one; and
      5) The smaller company can decide to drop you down from four days a week to three to two and so on as they train up your replacement(s), thus saving them money and giving you more time at the larger company.

    96. Re:Bargain by randyleepublic · · Score: 1

      But the point is that this is how managers think. Recognizing that this attitude exists among managers is a key factor in the poster making the best decision.

      --
      Social Credit would solve everything...
    97. Re:Bargain by Compaqt · · Score: 1

      >My asshole boss told all my cow-orkers that I was the reason they were not getting raises.

      Cow-orkers? Bad image ...

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cattle
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orc_(Middle-earth)

      --
      I'm not a lawyer, but I play one on the Internet. Blog
    98. Re:Bargain by Spacezilla · · Score: 1

      I used to get $77k, which my boss increased from $64k just a couple of months before, because he was very pleased with my work (Excel VBA). Our competitor approached me and offered me $128k. I didn't know whether to tell my boss, but I did, because when in doubt I always pick honesty, and he said: "So what did you tell them?", so I said I told them I'd think about it. He said: "I would too, that's a lot of money!" He asked me what it would take for me to stay and I said: "I don't know, at least $100k?" He said I could have the $100k if I agreed to adding to my contract that we both have three months more notice (I had one before, they had four) and I agreed. That way he knew that if I decided to leave, they still had me for four months while they found a replacement and I trained him. If they decide to fire me, I get full pay for seven months. It's been a bit more than year now and I'm still with the company and very happy with how everything turned out. :)

    99. Re:Bargain by n7ytd · · Score: 1

      And, yes, the economy tanked, the startup failed, and I had no way back to my prior job. But that in no way makes me regret the decision I made, nor how I made it.

      This is an important factor: risk. Although you can't tell the future and no job is secure forever, you know where you stand in your current position. Jumping for the unknown is a risk and should be weighted as such in your decision to change jobs. The level of risk should be offset by compensation; money, flexible work schedule--whatever is important to you.

      I can't afford the same level of risk I could have 10 years ago; if I found my dream job, but it was with a shaky startup with 3 months worth of cash, I just couldn't afford to take that offer at any reasonable salary. Of course for $300k/year, I would be more than happy to work the 3 months and see what happens.

    100. Re:Bargain by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Cow-orkers is an old Dilbert reference.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    101. Re:Bargain by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but a round trip on the light rail is $3.20, plus wear and tear and any insurance costs incurred by excess driving (which isn't a problem for me, really, because my lack of a daily commute to work is HUGE to my insurance company--more than half a normal person's driving, and during high risk hours, is the daily work commute). I can carry more home in a car, but I don't; usually a gallon and a half of soy milk, bread, lunch meat for the week, a couple tins of Tang, sometimes I slip a frozen pie in there, a butterflied lamb leg, a couple pounds of cheese... I've come home with $80 of stuff before.

      It fits my needs because I live alone and don't need a lot of groceries per week. Some stuff--eggs, for example--I grab for the month. I have a problem here where bread I get seems to not go stale, but after a week it's toxic--the stuff ferments into grain alcohol, I don't understand this. In any case, I can do a week's worth of shopping in one trip; if I had an ExtraWheel or front panniers I could manage double that, but I'd have to take the handicap ramp on and off.

      That's my life situation, and why I don't move to the slightly cheaper apartments ($50/mo or so) closer to work. A 7 mile bike ride takes me 45 minutes, while car ride takes almost as long. This is doable for a daily commute, and I'm fine with it. It seems unintuitive, but I really don't want to bike 7 miles out to the light rail to ride up north, then bike back; I don't want to bike 7 miles into the city on impulse to hang out down the harbor or go to the book store or whatever; and so on.

      All the things I can do on impulse are just 10 minutes away by bicycle, and my quality of life is higher with that easy reach than with the more economical setup of replacing my high-volume mandatory commute with a shorter commute. Yes, I'd have much less work to put in; no, I don't do the long bike ride for fun, and I'd prefer a shorter commute. Still, the point is I'd face a barrier on the "Let's go out right now" impulse: if I haven't planned for this ahead, I'm facing "I'll be there in an hour, 40 minutes if I really lay some power down" for that, at which point ... I'd rather not, and I don't want to drive and deal with parking. My daily commute is daily, I get up in the morning with this in mind, my life is planned around it; it's not an agility thing.

      Which is all my point: if I had to work, say, 14 miles north-west ... that would destroy my quality of life. I'd have to pay a lot more for gas, wear and tear, and insurance for my car; or just move closer, and drive into the city when I want to go there. Either way, the economic expense of driving would go up significantly since all the good stuff is out of reach suddenly. My employer better give me a $20k raise for that... no, not even; I'm looking for a $15k raise anyway, so I want $35k-$40k. And then my life style would change. The costs are high, higher than just dollars.

      His dollar basis and his time basis add up to a good chunk more than $7k, as mine would if I got a different job in a less convenient arrangement.

  31. Take the job by NeumannCons · · Score: 1

    I've seen many people who seemed extremely critical leave. Once we had someone leave who convinced a couple of others to jump as well. Others fill in the gap (amazing how quickly some people learn when they *really* need to), new talent is hired. Take the new job, enjoy the 7.5 hours a week of more time, invest the money and meet your old pals at the pub.

  32. Need constant variability? by fredrikv · · Score: 1

    I'll just cite the Quote of the day, at the bottom of this page:
    "In any formula, constants (especially those obtained from handbooks) are to be treated as variables."

  33. No by Greyfox · · Score: 2

    Being loyal buys you being stuck at the same salary and benefits level for a decade. You'll see much better advancement if you're a whore. Back in the 90's during the tech bubble in the USA you could change contracting companies like you change your underwear (At least once ever 6 months!) and pick up a $10K a year pay raise each time. Since the tech bubble burst that's slowed down a bit here, and a lot of the incompetent ones fell out of the market. You could probably work that craze in India until the tech companies find some new outsourcing darling country (Greece and Iraq are who I'm thinking are next.)

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  34. Happiness by sjbe · · Score: 1

    However, I have been approached by another company that is much bigger, and they have offered me a pay rise of £7k to do the same job, plus their office is practically outside my front door (as opposed to my current 45 minute commute each way). This would make a massive difference to my life .

    Those last two words are the important bit. You need to decide what is important in YOUR life. Quality of life is very important. Rejecting anyone is a painful experience and that includes companies you work for.

    If you are going to burn bridges, think hard about whether it is worth it but then make your decision and don't look back. There are no guarantees for you or from either company. If the new job seems like a secure gig and it will improve your quality of life I'd consider it. Look VERY carefully at the corporate culture and the people you'll be working with. That is usually what makes or breaks a job.

    Some friends have told me that I'm just being 'soft' – however I think I'm being loyal. Any advice?"

    You are being soft though that might not be a bad thing. It means you are probably a considerate and decent person. Don't let that stop you from doing what is best for you though.

    Success is getting what you want. Happiness is wanting what you get.

  35. Loyalty goes both ways by jalefkowit · · Score: 1

    So you're loyal to your company. Great. How loyal are they to you?

    Do they pay you at or above what you could make elsewhere?

    Do they do their best to schedule things so that you're not constantly working death-march overtime?

    Do they respect you and your contributions?

    Do they lay people off only when they absolutely have to, or whenever doing so could goose their quarterly numbers?

    Loyalty is great. Loyalty is undervalued. But loyalty has to be earned, and while you've told us you're loyal to your company you haven't given us any reasons why, so we can't judge whether your loyalty is misplaced or not. The one reason you gave is that you consider some of your current managers to be friends, and that's great, but I can tell you from experience that just because a manager is your friend doesn't necessarily mean that he won't lay your ass off in a hot minute if he thinks he can benefit by doing so. There are lots of people who put the "business" part of "business friendships" first and foremost.

    If this company has earned your loyalty -- if they've gone above and beyond to treat you with the respect you deserve -- then by all means return that loyalty. If it's just a place you've worked for a few years, though, then in the long run you'll do better to look out for number one and save your loyalty for people who deserve it.

  36. Decisions, decisions... by AtomicSnarl · · Score: 1

    Even a crap job is tolerable if the people are decent and the money is fair. Loyalty is due where loyalty is repaid. Granted, employment contracts and Non-Compete clauses always limit and grate, but is where you are now giving/getting you what you want? Will the green grass over the fence do better for you in the long run? Do you accept the burdens of those changes in the short run?

    It can be pretty cheesy to attempt to "measure" your friendship, much less deliberately test it, but if you feel you're part of something larger (and a good part at that), then you don't even need to ask the question.

    It's the old 4-panel plan problem. Take a sheet of paper, fold it in four, and mark them 6, 12, 5, 100. Then list things you want to do in the next 6 weeks, 12 months, 5 years, and 100 years. Review it carefully. The 6/12/5 items should lead somehow to the 100 year items. Climb a mountain? Sure! Learn mountain climbing? Yeah, I can do that in 5 years easy. Ah -- get fit first. Yep, can start that this year. Six weeks to find a good trainer -- can do!

    So -- where are you going, and and is where you are (or wish you were) part of getting there?

    --
    Pacifist paratroopers yell, "Ghandi!" when they jump.
    1. Re:Decisions, decisions... by abies · · Score: 1

      100 years - be still alive and functioning
      5 years - start taking wonderful anti-aging nanobots
      12 months - make sure wonderful anti-aging nanobots are put into clinic trials so they can be available for public 4 years later
      6 weeks - read about invention of wonderful anti-aging nanobots on Slashot or invent them myself

      I'm have already created not working, large scale prototype of nanobot from origami, now I need somebody to miniaturize them and add some clockwork mechanism inside to get them ticking.

  37. The real solution by UnresolvedExternal · · Score: 1

    The real solution is to search slashdot for the last 5k times that this question has been asked. Some of the answers are really good.

    *sigh*

  38. Does Being 'Loyal' Pay As a Developer? by 1s44c · · Score: 1

    Does Being 'Loyal' Pay As a Developer?

    No

    1. Re:Does Being 'Loyal' Pay As a Developer? by SleazyRidr · · Score: 1

      Does Being 'Loyal' Pay?

      No

      You can save a few characters there....

    2. Re:Does Being 'Loyal' Pay As a Developer? by mick_S3 · · Score: 1

      This is good advice. But to answer your actual question posed in the thread title, not just NO but FARK NO. Be above board about the situation and at the end of the day, you are better off leaving. Even if you get a matching offer from your current employer there is a good chance they will resent it and begin moving to get out the door on their timeline not yours. If the offer is in your best interests, make the move, but be above board about the reasons and give plenty of notice. If your current employer isn't a vindictive twat, they will respect that you were honest and dealt in good faith and you won't have burned any bridges. If they are dickheads, either way the relationship is over and nothing of value to you will have been lost.

      --
      A gin in the hand is worth two in the bottle.
  39. Give generous notice and take the best job by Pollardito · · Score: 2

    1. Tell the new employer that you'd like to give a longer-than-usual notice to your current employer
    2. Figure out between you and your new employer what length of time is reasonable
    3. Tell your old employer that you're leaving, but that you're giving them this extended notice
    4. Make the move

    Hopefully when you're looking for the next job after this one your current employer will remember that you did them a favor, because that's who you'll likely be using as a reference and not these new people you're talking to now. And even if they forget that you were nice to them on the way out, you'll still know that you did "the right thing" (and not "the sucker thing" by staying forever just because they weren't smart enough to make people slightly redundant)

    1. Re:Give generous notice and take the best job by Pope · · Score: 1

      This is one of the best answers so far IMO. Document the hell out of what you know, make sure the juniors understand it, and leave to new prospects with a clear conscious. Win-win.

      Don't avoid exciting opportunities out of "loyalty," but make sure the current folks know why you want to leave and ensure there is no bad blood, ie. just giving two weeks' notice and leaving them in the lurch. Transition cleanly, and everyone comes out ahead.

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    2. Re:Give generous notice and take the best job by Zaphod+The+42nd · · Score: 1

      Yes, this is exactly the right answer. Surprised so few people seemed to get it. Tell your current employer that you're on the way out, but you're willing to give them a few weeks to get things together. That'll let them plan around it, you can finish training the new guys, but you still get out and get your pay raise. Two-weeks notice or more is very common or actually enforced in most contracts, so this shouldn't be a problem for your new employer.

      --
      GCS/MU/P d- s:- a-- C++++$ UL++ P+ L++ E+ W++ N o K- w--- O M+ V- PS+++ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5- X R++ tv+ b++ DI++ D++ G+ e++ h-
    3. Re:Give generous notice and take the best job by SoftwareArtist · · Score: 1

      I'd mod this up if I had points right now. I once did exactly this. My group was in the final stages of putting out a release. I told them I'd accepted a new job, but would stay on until the release date (that worked out to about six weeks notice) to avoid delaying it and to give lots of time for knowledge transfer. This shows your loyalty and professionalism. Your current company will appreciate that you "went the extra mile" (or is that kilometer in the UK?), and your new manager will be impressed that you're someone who can be trusted, who doesn't just think about himself.

      --
      "I'm too busy to research this and form an educated opinion, but I do have time to tell everyone my uninformed opinion."
  40. Loyalty requires worthiness by IICV · · Score: 1

    You have to ask yourself: is the company currently worth being loyal to?

    All too often, people seem to think that loyalty is, in and of itself, something you should strive for. It's not. Being mindlessly loyal is just plain dumb; the things you choose to be loyal to should, in some way, be worthy of that loyalty.

    Your current company doesn't seem like it really cares about being worthy of your loyalty. I'm sure their flagship product was shipped out overseas against your recommendation, if they even bothered to ask (and that's entirely ignoring the incredibad business decision of outsourcing a core product), which just indicates that they don't really care.

    Also, if another company is willing to try and snipe you off with a raise, you're probably worth significantly more than what either of them are offering. I mean, just ask yourself - if I'm worth my salary + 7k (which is what another company is willing to pay for me right now), why hasn't my current company given me that raise? Because they're taking advantage of your "loyalty".

    Finally, the fact that they've given you two junior devs to train up at this juncture kinda sounds like they've decided that you're too much of a senior dev, and they'd prefer to pay two junior salaries instead of one senior salary. This is, of course, conjecture, but this sort of behavior is not at all unknown in business.

    So yeah, it really seems like there's no reason to be loyal to the company, even though there may be people in the company who are worthwhile. What has the company done recently to be worthy of your loyalty? Keep in mind that your current salary is in exchange for your work, if they want your loyalty they have to do more.

  41. How much does loyalty pay? by ElmoGonzo · · Score: 1

    The part that concerns me is the part about the "interesting" code from outsourcing. Having spent too much time with "interesting" code I would suggest that if you are not in a position where you can ensure that it is made less interesting then your days are already numbered and it's time to vote with your feet.

  42. Do What You Love by Courageous · · Score: 2

    My advice:

    Do what you love. Make sure that much is true, no matter what you do. More money isn't worth it.

    Pursue new opportunities, whenever you can. Mix things up. Internally at your current place, or externally if you have to leave to get the new challenge.

    Don't let yourself get idle and waste away with boredom for fear of the unknown.

    Exploit new opportunities.

    If the new place has a good reputation, GO. Don't take the counter offer. Just GO.

    Loyalty is mostly misplaced in the modern corporate world. However, it might be worthwhile to tie up your current project, and then go hunting. A bold move would be a nationwide hunt, and not just one next door.

    Some part of you wants to be comfortable, and the unknown is uncomfortable. Big changes are uncomfortable. Look that in the eye.

    Many people go through their entire lives not looking themselves in the eye.

    So to speak.

    C//

  43. Turn the question around. by mano.m · · Score: 1

    If your company could hire someone else equally qualified, experienced and competent to do your work for £7k less, would they have any qualms firing you? What about £15k? Outsource it to India for 15% of the cost?

    You are in a purely transactional relationship. You provide knowledge and hard work, and you get paid in money, prestige and satisfaction. That's it. It's your company, not your parent or sibling or friend or spouse - you 'owe' it no loyalty beyond that transactional relationship (and even personal relationships break down when they don't work out....). You wouldn't think twice about switching if someone opened up a new grocery store that was closer to your home and offered the same products for a lower price. Why is this different?

    Do yourself a favour, mate. Go get the £7k + 7.5 hours of your life (almost a full work day on its own!) per week back. Good luck!

    --
    Karma fed to this user will be promptly burnt. Be warned; be wary.
  44. Flee! by osu-neko · · Score: 1

    Flee! Flee while you still can!

    Seriously, though, you should talk to them (your current employer). Explain the situation, and give them the chance to make it worth your while to stay. See if they want you badly enough to pay for it. The results, either way, may surprise you and make your choice very much more clear.

    --
    "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
  45. Loyalty probably doesn't mean anything to them... by mark-t · · Score: 1

    But that said, it might mean something to you. If you feel better about yourself remaining where you are than you would leaving your current employer high and dry in exchange for a higher salary, then that peace of mind is certainly of great value, and the guilt you may feel at your new job if you were to leave your current one could even adversely affect your capabilities.

    It is, of course, ultimately up to you.... How do *YOU* feel about leaving your current job? Would you regret leaving if it turned out that your former employer had difficulties after your absence? Is that even likely? If it were to happen, weigh its probability against how much you would likely regret not taking the new job? If you can answer these questions for yourself, you will have arrived at the most sensible course of action that you can take with the knowledge that you have now.

  46. Rewards of Loyalty by sesshomaru · · Score: 1

    I can only speak about the US. Generally, companies work at retaining people through various means:

    1. Severance Package: You won't get a severance package at your new job until you are vested, in the US at least. That means getting through you probationary period. Severance packages are always much better than our pitiful US unemployment insurance, which they are always making more humiliating to access and more difficult to collect. How much are you giving up to change jobs?

    2. Perks: These can be things as simple as having a relaxed work environment, versus being in a pressure cooker. You seem happy where you are, will the new job burn you out in a few months?

    3. Communication: Does the company surprise you with bad news, or does it keep you in the loop?

    A 7k raise doesn't mean much if they get rid of you in a couple of months.

    --
    "MIT betrayed all of its basic principles."
  47. In a similar situation myself by foobat · · Score: 1

    A friend once told me that "You have to be in it for yourself.".

    If you decided to stay on, would this crucial time stop soon? Or as I suspect, go on forever. This situation actually is so close to what a couple of guys here are going through, I had to ask around if it was one of us who submitted it.

    Guess it's time to jump ship.

  48. Are you kidding? by gestalt_n_pepper · · Score: 1

    When your immediate usefulness is perceived to have ended, your "friends" would grind you up and sell you as dog food for a few extra pounds if they thought they could get a way with it.

    Short answer? Don't be an idiot.

    --
    Please do not read this sig. Thank you.
  49. It's OK to move on... by koala_dude · · Score: 1

    Have you gotten everything you need from this job, professionally, financially, and personally? Are you satisfied this move is the best choice for you to grow professionally?

    If you want this other position, give your current employer proper notice, and work with them to make the transition as smooth as possible. You can even discuss the possibility of being available as a consultant for a while if they need.

    On the other hand, you might look over the offer and decide the trade-offs aren't worth it. Sometimes, the increased money is accompanied by increased stress...longer commutes, longer hours, more demands on your personal life (e.g., being on call 24/7). An interesting and rewarding job that pays less might be the better option then.

    Chances are, however, you're intrigued by a new challenge, a new beginning, and better pay. Why not take the leap?

    Remember, in the end, you are replaceable. It's part of business. People get sick, hit by buses...or better offers. Leave gracefully, don't burn any bridges, and you can continue to stay friends with those co-workers with whom you are close.

    Best wishes on your decision. In this economy, it's rare to have such a choice to make!

  50. Extend your notice period? by amw · · Score: 1

    It's still possible to be loyal and yet move on. It may be that the new company would accept you working a longer notice period at your current employer (for example, if you're on 4 weeks ask if they'd wait 6 or even 8 for you)? That should be sufficient to ensure that the company can bring someone else in of a similar skill level to yourself, that the product can be handed over with minimal disruption, and you leave things in a stable situation.

    It's your career, after all. Sometimes you do have to be selfish, otherwise you will never leave.

  51. Quit right away. by fizzup · · Score: 1

    You think that your management is inside your circle of friends, but they would do anything for money. Maybe they wouldn't kill your grandmother, not sure. In business, this is called "making the hard decisions." You have to do it to manage people. In business, this is called "playing with the big boys."

    You must quit your job now, because you have an unhealthy relationship with your coworkers and bosses. You will be badly hurt if they ever have to let you go, and it will take a long time to recover from it at a time when you will have to search for a job.

    1. Re:Quit right away. by ThinkDifferently · · Score: 1

      Yes. I once worked for a supervisor (younger than me) who was friends with one of his supervised employees. When I joined the company, their friendship flourished for many months, but one day, the employee did something where management (his friend) had to step in. Their friendship went right out the door that day.

    2. Re:Quit right away. by The+Man · · Score: 1

      You think that your management is inside your circle of friends, but they would do anything for money. Maybe they wouldn't kill your grandmother, not sure. In business, this is called "making the hard decisions." You have to do it to manage people. In business, this is called "playing with the big boys."

      You must quit your job now, because you have an unhealthy relationship with your coworkers and bosses. You will be badly hurt if they ever have to let you go, and it will take a long time to recover from it at a time when you will have to search for a job.

      Best advice I've ever read on Slashdot. Maybe that's not saying much, but I would give anything to have had this implanted in my brain 5 years ago.

  52. You can have your cake and eat it by Alioth · · Score: 1

    What you can do is this.

    Take the new job, but tell your current employer for a limited time, you'll support them after hours for up to an hour a day (the hour you're currently losing to commuting). Overall, no net loss to your life, and in the end you gain an hour you didn't have before.

    Losing the commute is very important. Not only do you get the hour of your life back, even if the new job had the same pay you're effectively gaining the money you'd have to spend on fuel and your car. Fuel prices are only set to go up. You might even be able to sell your car (which is a colossal expense), or if you're a 2 car family, you may be able to go down to a 1 car family.

  53. You are the most important consideration by Ramley · · Score: 1

    In my experience as a developer who has managed a department, trained "jr' developers on our product(s), and was "loyal to the end", I can tell you that you need to do what is best for you, now and down the road.

    I put my time (too many hours), heart and soul into my job(s), and was close with upper management, etc.

    What I found is: In the end, the company will do what it needs to, to survive/thrive at [almost] any expense -- including you and your job.

    What you must do is find what is the best scenario for you to survive/thrive, and mostly enjoy going to work each day. Of course you want to balance your decision with factors such as burning bridges, making sure your new position has long-term stability, etc.

    I wish you the best in your decision. I can only offer that you do what's best for you, and don't look back.

  54. No. by sidragon.net · · Score: 1

    You will be on the chopping block the moment circumstances necessitate it.

  55. That depends... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Loyalty is considered to be a virtue for a reason(hominid life, up until the past few thousand years, and still in many places up to the present day has basically been a case of 'iterative prisoner's dilemma'. As it turns out, being a good guy by default, and only shafting the other guy if he has a history of shafting people works out for everyone fairly well.)

    So, here's the question: if you job, by virtue of size/holding structure of company, psychological profile of leader figures, etc. is still small enough that its behavior is largely governed by "human" heuristics, loyalty can pay off. They will know who their loyal people are, value that, and your long-term payoff(especially if the product launch goes well) is likely to be good.

    If the company is larger than a certain size, run by sociopaths, or otherwise no longer governed by conventional human logic, the management will still recognize "loyal" employees; but by "loyal" they mean "sucker who will stay around for more punishment, for illogical emotional reasons, until we suck him dry and throw his husk away". Bad situation...

    That's the real trick. Being loyal to people is usually a pretty good idea. Being loyal to an organization or sociopath who considers you a "human resource" and your "loyalty" to be a form of primitive emotional weakness that makes you easier to exploit is always a terrible, terrible plan.

    If your employer would(hypothetically), tell you to clean out your desk and instruct security not to let the door hit your worthless ass on the way out if you were to get sick and be expected to be less productive because of treatment/recovery for a period of time, then it is a fairly safe bet that you are just an "input" to them. If so, fuck-em. They'd fuck you over for money, and it looks like you've been handed the change to do unto them before they do unto you.

    If, in that same hypothetical situation, they would exhibit care, understanding, concern, accomodation, etc, it is probable that they are the sort of entity that will recognize, value, and reciprocate loyalty...

    1. Re:That depends... by JonySuede · · Score: 1

      If your employer would(hypothetically), tell you to clean out your desk and instruct security not to let the door hit your worthless ass on the way out if you were to get sick and be expected to be less productive because of treatment/recovery for a period of time, then it is a fairly safe bet that you are just an "input" to them. If so, fuck-em. They'd fuck you over for money, and it looks like you've been handed the change to do unto them before they do unto you.

      If, in that same hypothetical situation, they would exhibit care, understanding, concern, accomodation, etc, it is probable that they are the sort of entity that will recognize, value, and reciprocate loyalty...

      Well said, this is the best litmus test of organizational consideration toward its employees that I have read!

      --
      Jehovah be praised, Oracle was not selected
    2. Re:That depends... by robertinventor · · Score: 1

      Just to say no-one has yet mentioned that there are the customers as well, who may be waiting for the new product. Or if no-one knows about it yet, all the people who may find it useful once developed. As a sole trader developer myself, so no issues with employers or employees, and no questions about being hired by someone else - they are the ones I have uppermost in my mind when developing products.

      If you do need to move, then the tips about offering to be a consultant after the move, and making sure your code is well documented before you leave seem like good advice. Also explaining the situation to all concerned and trying to make the transition as easy as possible for all concerned.

      There's no need to way up the pros and cons about how much you will be benefited long term either way, it's the only decent thing to do as a human being who cares about others. Which you obviously do by your question. If you don't care about others then life soon isn't really that much worth living.

      Some scientists seem to reason like this: because human beings have evolved to be fit to survive, therefore, one should act to ensure ones own survival and venefit as paramount.

      But that's a confusion of things - the mind and body are shaped by evolution for sure, and with capacities and capabilities that help us to survive, but no moral imperatives arise from that, we are able to think independently and can make our own decisions about what to do with the mind and body. Evolution has just developed a body and mind with certain capabilities.

      Similarly when you buy a new car, many of them are carefully developed to be driven safely at enormous speeds well beyond speed limits, over 100 mph, but that doesn't mean you have to drive at 100 mph all the time, or at all.

      And physically some things are just impossible to evolve. You can't evolve a bird with heavy wings and strong heavy muscular legs, because useful as heavier bones would be on the ground, it wouldn't be able to get off the ground. Similarly some things that might be of survival value in the mind may be incompatible with other things.

      In the same way I think it is surely impossible for evolution to create a living intelligent being sensitive to emotions and feelings of those around them without any sense of sympathy for others and recognition that they have the same issues and problems and suffering as you have yourself. Because sympathy is something that arises naturally as soon as you have a mind that is aware and sensitive in that way.

      You can fight against feelings of sympathy, you can hide them, you can run away from them, your life can be just a huge struggle to ignore them, but I think no human being really doesn't have those feelings at all no matter how much they may think they are immune from them.

      Some, e.g. perhaps autistic ? may seem to have much less awareness than usual of other's feelings and emotions - But when that happens, then they are to a fair extent handicapped from functioning properly as a social animal. And I think still, not immune from sympathy.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Empathy#Autism_spectrum_disorders

      "What is clear is that, while people on the spectrum may not respond easily to external gestures/sounds, they do respond most readily if the initiative they witness is already part of their repertoire. This points to the selective use of incoming information rather than absence of recognition. It would appear that people with autism are actually rather good at recognition and imitation if the action they perceive is one that has meaning and significance for their brains. As regards the failure of empathic response, it would appear that at least some people with autism are oversensitive to the feelings of others rather than immune to them, but cannot handle the painful feed-back that this initiates in the body, and have therefore learnt to suppress this facility. An appare

  56. "This would make a massive difference to my life." by bbasgen · · Score: 1

    I always find that the best way to give advice is to repeat back what people say. You said: "This would make a massive difference to my life." Is that true? If so, then the decision is obvious. In that vein, I would interpret your loyalty question as an emotional one: you are attached to where you work, you have put a lot of time and effort into your work. You are very proud of what you have accomplished and what you know. Those are all good things, but going back to the massive difference in your life, it sounds like it is time to move on. That's a good thing.

  57. Re:Ask for a creative counter-offer by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

    That's some good stuff from an AC.

    Part of it comes down to whether you will enjoy what is offered in the "new" job. If you like where you area and are just going for the money, it's a bad move.

    Alternately, if the outsourced code is a bad as you say it is, you could be in for a lot of uncomp'd overtime fixing problems and keeping that new product from crashing and burning with your employer's clients. Consider what your job might be like in a year when comparing it to what you are considering.

    And, to add to an earlier post - consider consulting. If they truly love you, and you value the project but have two guys who can start to fill your shoes, they'll be happy to have an emergency outlet. Plus, if you keep them running, they shouldn't harbor ill will.

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  58. Yes, It can pay, and you can still get the new job by unimacs · · Score: 1

    I was in a similar situation. An opportunity came up that I couldn't ignore, but leaving my current company would have left them in a real bind. What did I do?

    I gave them 1 months notice. I told the new company that that's the only way I would take the job and that I would probably do the same for them down the road. I actually think they were impressed by that. During that month I attended some meetings at the new company, did some "homework" and was already getting some stuff done for them before my official start date.

    My old company asked if I'd mind doing some work for them now and then while they got up to speed on the things I was doing. I said as long it was something fairly quick, I'd be willing to do it.

    Did I mention that this was during the dot-com bubble? Fast forward 5 months and my flashy new company had burned through all it's money. There was a buyer and what was supposedly a "done deal" fell apart at the last minute. Suddenly I was without a job. The collapse was one of the top stories in the business section of the local paper.

    The next morning I get a call from my old boss: "I heard you might be looking for work."

    Got a nice raise and have been there ever since. Don't burn bridges if you can avoid it.

  59. Be open.. by malkavian · · Score: 1

    Talk to your current employers, let them know the score.
    If you're happy where you are, then you may just be taking a leap to somewhere more stifling (larger companies have a different feel to startups when you work there). That's an 'if' though, it may work better for you.
    If they get shirty about the info, then you can always leave to the new job (no risk to you). If they really value you (and can afford it), maybe they'll match or exceed the new offer you have.
    That's the thing with conversations, you rarely know how they'll end before you start them. You'll learn a lot by talking to your current employers, that'll direct your actions once you know the results.

  60. As an employer, give them a chance to compete by brian_tanner · · Score: 1

    I'm an employer. I've invested a huge amount of time and money in my people. Times are tough, so I'm not going around offering $10k raises indiscriminately. However, they are key people who I would pay that much to keep, and there would be bad blood if those people would have stayed after a round of negotiation but decided not to give me an opportunity to consider the situation.

    Us bosses are not all unreasonable. Many of us have had to make tough decisions leaving one place for a better opportunity. I've actually had this conversation with each of my employees. I tell them: "if you are ever unhappy or you start feeling like the grass is greener somewhere else, let's talk about it. If the difference between keeping you and losing you is a few dollars or benefits, I want to work with you to find something that works for both of us."

    1. Re:As an employer, give them a chance to compete by dcollins · · Score: 1

      Taking this a case study, do not give your employer unwarranted information like the parent is lobbying for. It weakens your bargaining and decision-making abilities. Make the decision for yourself and just go.

      --
      We know where leadership by an anti-intellectual "strongman" who scapegoats minorities and likes boisterous rallies goes
    2. Re:As an employer, give them a chance to compete by brian_tanner · · Score: 1

      I just don't understand how that is anything but a net loss to "just go". If you really need/want to leave, then that makes sense. But if you would have been satisfied to stay if the compensation was appropriate, why not have that option? Not only do you have to start over with no rapport with the rest of the office, no seniority, no earned respect, but your current employer is blindsided and almost surely in rough shape because of it.

      Now I don't know the OP's situation, but I'm in a small business. I only have a handful of employees and each one requires months of training before they are effective in their roles in our workflow. In the time that they are not effective, I have to pull 80 hour weeks to do their job and mine. Further, it costs me thousands (a real percentage of our yearly revenue) to advertise, interview, hire, and retrain someone else. I don't have the resources or space to have multiple staff for each role, so if someone just quits on me, it's a disaster. Again, maybe not the OP's situation, but I'm surprised how many posts here think their employer is a faceless entity that would fire them in a second. NOT ALL BUSINESSES ARE LIKE THAT.

    3. Re:As an employer, give them a chance to compete by dcollins · · Score: 1

      "Not only do you have to start over with no rapport with the rest of the office, no seniority, no earned respect, but your current employer is blindsided and almost surely in rough shape because of it."

      From the employee's POV, all of this is exactly reversed.
      - "no rapport" -- an opportunity to expand professional contacts.
      - "no seniority" -- or greater seniority, if hired into a higher-up position.
      - "no earned respect" -- or greater earned respect, if a higher price-point has been set to your skills.
      And the fourth point is obviously moot for the employee.

      Personally, if I spent time interviewing for other positions, then a priori I would not "have been satisfied to stay if the compensation was appropriate". Why wasn't I given regular raises to keep my compensation competitive? Why do I have to spend extra time confirming that's the case? If this is the established operating procedure, then I should go, and have an opportunity to expand my skills, work variety, and professional networking.

      The employer should be paying enough in advance, and with a hospitable work environment, to insure against this happening. And from personal experience I know that getting outside offers are routinely held grudgingly against the existing employee, whatever the immediate end result.

      --
      We know where leadership by an anti-intellectual "strongman" who scapegoats minorities and likes boisterous rallies goes
  61. Freakonomics Covered something like this... by ddxexex · · Score: 1

    Freakonomics Radio had a relevant podcast about this recently "The upside of Quitting".

    http://freakonomicsradio.com/the-upside-of-quitting.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+freakonomicsradio+%28Freakonomics+Radio%29

    But the longer you wait,the harder it'll be for you to quit, so if you're thinking of maybe quitting later, you should assume that you don't want to quit your job period.

  62. You should be loyal too is yourself by protosage · · Score: 1

    The first person/thing you should be loyal too is yourself. Then prioritize after that. This is how any company works especially these days.

  63. Take it. by Ecyrd · · Score: 1

    Seriously, take it. You aren't as important to your current employer as you think you are.

    Oh, they will cajole and complain. But you will kick yourself for the years to come because you will wonder what would've happened if you had taken the job.

    And, if you say, the management are really your friends, they'll understand eventually. Good management understands the value of keeping even leaving people happy - because after all, the employees might want to come back some day.

  64. You could always do what I did... by ThinkDifferently · · Score: 1

    Take the new job, but promise to consult back to the old company (assuming it's ok with the next company). There was a period of 4 months, I went back to my old company as an independent consultant part time until the project was done.

    There's also this. It's your current company's own fault for putting all of their eggs into one basket, you. They should know better, and they should have a contingency plan if you should leave, die or otherwise fail to come to work. That's their problem. To put all of that burden onto you is unfair and stupid on their part.

  65. Hardest part may yet to come by swanzilla · · Score: 1

    I just went though a strikingly similar situation. The old company provided a counter offer that was higher than the new company's offer when I put in my notice. My decision to make the move boiled down to weighing the less obvious options...commute has turned out to be way more valuable than I had thought. I have better growth potential and a better job in general at the new place, but I really underestimated how lousy commuting was until mine became sub-five minutes. Don't disregard your time.

  66. Small company by DinDaddy · · Score: 1

    A lot of people here seem to be assuming your current employer is the typical faceless massive corp that treats its employees as disposable in spite of your characterization of them as small enough that you are on friendly terms with senior management.

    That sounds to me like a company where there is actually some sense of family atmosphere, and therefore worthy of a little consideration from you. I would talk to them and explain your dilemma. If you think you'll be better off with the new position, take it. But offer to assist with the current project to the best of your ability while starting the new job, at the very least taking phone calls to answer questions. Keeping that bridge intact instead of burning it at worst will cost you some personal hours in the next couple months, but could have much larger benefits in the future.

  67. Not a no brainer! by fleeped · · Score: 1

    A really important factor is the people you're working with. A healthy work/social environment where you'll spend half your waking day, you know? It's not everything about money, for fuck's sake!

    1. Re:Not a no brainer! by frog_strat · · Score: 1

      +1 !!! The most difficult problems are not technical, they are interpersonal !

    2. Re:Not a no brainer! by mmcuh · · Score: 1

      The more money you make, the sooner you can retire. And never have to work again.

  68. Extra Time At Home! by Isarian · · Score: 1

    Like parent says, document the hell out of everything so that they have the information they will need. After that, you're not only getting a 7K raise, but you're saving an hour and a half of your time every day, not to mention the cost of petrol? That's time you could spend with family, friends, and loved ones, taking up a hobby, or just relaxing, and that's petrol money you're saving on transit costs in addition to your raise.

    Your current job sounds like it's been good to you, and there's no harm in acknowledging that. However, you're not just a cog in their company machine, you're a person with your own needs and goals. If someone else has made an offer that fits those better, the only moral obligation you have is to make the transition for your current employer as easy as reasonably possible.

  69. Never burn bridges by Confused · · Score: 1

    The It business is small, so try to avoid burning bridges. Leave a good impression behind.

    In your case I would take the new job, but discuss with your new employer that you will have slow start (4 days a week for 3 months) and offer your old employer to act for those 3 months as a consultant for one day per week. Then make the damn sure your spend the rest of your time in getting your replacements up to speed.

    When working with reasonable people a reasonable solution can be found.

    As to asking your current employer for a raise, I doubt that will help much and you won't get the improved quality of life with the short commute to work.

  70. My recent experience by krazytekn0 · · Score: 1

    Well I haven't left my current employer but I recently moved a Heck of a lot closer and if you have a family or any kind of life outside of work that's important to you, do it. 1.5 hours a day is about what i saved and it adds up a ton! My life outside of work is so much better now, and that's the reason we should be working right?

    --
    Not all life is cyber. Extra Income
  71. Predictable /. comments by lorinc · · Score: 1

    Assuming most of /. readers are from the US, it seems that working for something else than money as a primary reason is a typical European concept... (Example: http://ask.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2465088&cid=37638874 is something about the actual work and has an email address in .co.uk)

  72. It's hard to understand the feeling of the moment by nhat11 · · Score: 1

    To be honest, this type of question is best for people who already experience this dilemma. People who nonchalant say just to move don't understand the amount of time and relationship you built with the company and the people within the company. Since I don't have any attachments to your situation or to people's issues around here, it's easier to say just go for it since there doesn't seem to be any downside to moving to the new company.

  73. Loyalty is a one way street by petes_PoV · · Score: 1

    Companies expect (or demand) it from their employees, but are incapable of showing any, themselves. It's not that companies are evil, it's just that an inanimate object or entity does not have feelings. If you ever anthropomorphise one you're making a mistake. They can only ever act for their own good - which may coincide with benefits for employees, but that's just a lucky side-effect.

    While you can get, and sometimes do get decision-making employees who act for the benefit of their subordinates that's rarely done with the company's sanction. If that benevolence leads to improved employee performance, then that's nice for all concerned but you can't rely on the next guy in the job (as nice guys rarely last long) having the same enlightened attitude.

    I'd say: get out now, while the offer still stands. You have no idea whether this new product will succeed or bomb and you can't owe you existing company anything (see anthropomorphising it, above). So go for the larger, more secure and more convenient option. If you still feel a pull towards your existing company, you could always moonlight for them!

    --
    politicians are like babies' nappies: they should both be changed regularly and for the same reasons
  74. Go for it. You'll thank yourself later. by sl4shd0rk · · Score: 1

    Been there, done that. The company you're at right now would certainly not think twice about laying you off if they hit financial difficulty. Business is business and you are in a business agreement with current said company. If they have not put the effort or money into a parallel knowledge store for their flagship product, that is really irresponsible planning on their part. Where would their product be if you met your demise on that 45min commute one morning?

    I would go for the new job. Ask future employer if a 3-week or 4-week notice is appropriate so you can get everyone up-to-speed at old job. Offer to be telephone/weekend support as needed for old company at pre-established rate.

    Your "friends" will be supportive and understand if they really are friends.

    --
    Join the Slashcott! Feb 10 thru Feb 17!
  75. I just left a 16 year career by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I wasn't fired. I didn't quit. It was a mutual agreement for me to leave, with severance.

    Since 1995 I had worked for the company or it's parent except for a 10 month break where I worked for another company.

    3 years ago the CIO was replaced, and he brought in all new IT management. People that didn't know anyone. That was the point where loyalty ended, but I didn't realize this until a couple of weeks ago when I left.

    The offer was to work all of the time, Sundays included, or to leave the company. I left.

    I took a job at the place the former CIO works. Might even get a pay raise.

    Loyalty is about people, not the company. Working with people you know, and consider friends, is what is important.

  76. If you are really essential by SirGarlon · · Score: 1

    If you are really essential to your employer, they should make you a partner in the business. What have your bonuses, raises, and profit sharing looked like for the last few years? My guess is, if 7K makes a difference to you, then your employer does not value as highly as you (rightly or wrongly) value yourself.

    In which case, they'll get by without you. Once you have an offer in hand, you can negotiate with both employers on how much time you'll need for a responsible transition -- say a couple of months. That is loyalty. Your current employer will appreciate you taking time to responsibly hand over your duties, and your future employer should be impressed that you're the kind of person who ties up loose ends.

    --
    [Sir Garlon] is the marvellest knight that is now living, for he destroyeth many good knights, for he goeth invisible.
  77. Don't think in terms of "loyalty" by khchung · · Score: 1

    Think in terms of real tangible things like:

    Contract - your obligation to your current employer is spelled out in your contract already. How much notice do you need to give? If they needed longer notice when you leave, they would have added it in the contract already (and bound themselves to give you the same notice period, usually means extra $$, when they fire you). So why worry about them not having enough time when they don't bother to bound themselves to pay more if they fire you?

    Commute - "practically next door" usually still mean a few minutes of commute. While you still save over an hour each day in your new job, but OTOH would you be required to stay late or longer because your home is practically just next door?

    Pay - is it 7K more per month? (no brainer, go to the next point) Or 7K more per year? If the latter, then the difference may not be that big percentage wise, unless you are absolutely clear about the new environment, it may not be enough to cover the risk. You may do better negotiating a raise in your current job.

    Environment - how much do you know about your new employer or working environment? It is always better to know more. Ask around. Are they slave drivers? Do they have a reputation for behaving honorably/honestly? How long have they been in business? Are their finance sound? etc etc.

    --
    Oliver.
  78. No matter what otehr people say by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

    Other people being unloyal or just generally crappy does not give you the right to do so.
    If you think that the company deserves loyalty, and you are the only one who can know this because this is a specific case, then you have to give that consideration and no one can really help you with the question because we do not work at this company and we do not necessarily have the same appreciation of lack there of of moral behaviour as you do.

    --
    Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
  79. You can have your cake and eat it too by themightythor · · Score: 1

    Here's what I've done historically. Take the new job but give your employer the option to contact you for issues that they can't figure out. Determine an hourly rate and be a consultant. Put time expectations on it (i.e. "I'll spend no more than 3 hours on an average week for the next 3 months"). Tell the new employer about your situation (in case there are conflict of interest issues). By doing this, you're giving your current employer a way to still have access to any unique knowledge that you have while still doing what's right for you. You get a reputation for being a good guy with the current employer (and likely the new since you're showing the behavior that you'll exhibit when you leave them) and you get the better job. Win-win.

  80. Working and loving what you do.. by lionchild · · Score: 1

    Do you love the work that you do? Are you excited to make that 45 minute commute to work? Do you really enjoy working at the company you're with? Could you see yourself as a stake holder or principal whose excited to make this product work and work well?

    Do you think that you'd feel these types of feelings at the company you've been offered a position at?

    If you don't like what you're doing or where you're doing it, then you're doing a disservice to the company whose paying you now. It's important not only to be in the right seat on the bus, but also to be on the right bus. You should enjoy the ride, and if you're not, then you're probably going the wrong direction.

    --
    Awk! Pieces of eight. Pieces of eight. Pieces of seven... ERROR: General Protection Fault. [Paroty Error.]
  81. Question is right, conclusion is wrong by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

    The question is do they have loyalty to you? There are companies that do. Some companies are very big on employee retention. Small businesses are often this way, some larger companies are too. The university I work for is quite loyal. No, that doesn't mean they'll keep every person forever and ever no matter what, but they really do seek to retain people when possible, and you find plenty of people who have things like 30, 40, 50 years of service.

    So that is the question to think about: How loyal is the company to its employees, and particularly to you? If they are loyal, then some loyalty in return can be a good thing. Something to be said for a company that views you as more than an expendable asset. Maybe they don't pay quite as much when things are red hot, but maybe they also keep you when things are not doing so well.

    So consider that question, and then decide how loyal to be. You don't "owe" them any loyalty, however it may be in your best interest to be loyal and that is what to think about.

    After you've considered that, also consider work environment, location, and that kind of thing. Don't just run around chasing a higher salary. A woman I know perpetually does that and it seems she's less happy in each job she gets. The money is better, but the environment is worse.

    Now in your case you mentioned commute as a reason to switch and that is real valid. I like where I work because I can bike instead of drive. Consider other factors too though, like how the work environment seems. There's something to be said for working with friends.

    I can't tell you which way to go, since I don't (and can't) know all the details. Just weigh everything, non-economic considerations as well. Keep the question of their loyalty to you in mind.

    However ultimately understand that you owe your company nothing other than the work you have provided. If you decide the advantage is to move, then move.

    1. Re:Question is right, conclusion is wrong by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      I don't think companies have loyalty at all. As far as I have seen, it has always been self-interest dressed up as loyalty. In my company, there was a period in which some of the executives went without pay for three months so that the line level employees could continue to get paid. One might think this was loyalty, but in fact it was more like people on an island who don't know how to fish foregoing a couple of meals so that the fishermen could be well fed.
      In fact, at one point, they just stopped paying everybody, and expected everybody to keep working. They promised to pay us in two weeks, but if they hadn't, and just kept stringing us along, I'm not sure how long it would have lasted.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
  82. You are not as important as you think. by jellomizer · · Score: 1

    The key thing to remember is that you are really not that important. Your job may be important and vital to the company but you personally are not and can be replaced. When you leave there may be some transition problems but nothing impossible.

    You need to think of yourself as your own company. and You, Inc. has only the resources to have one customer at a time, if your services include full time hours of service.

    So if you found a new customer who is willing to pay more for your services, and you feel the risk of swapping customers is worth it, then change.

    If you were that valuable to the company you left then the next valuable employee they get they may put more time to make sure they are being compensated competitively.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  83. Don't Do Anything Too Quickly: Rep's Feed Back by ecn0nce · · Score: 1

    How big is the 'Circle' in your related industry? Will your skills specialize you to the point that your circle shrinks? How well does this circle communicate?

    Reputations encompass many more things than just technical abilities... perhaps the fact there is any equivocation on your part is one of the qualities that your prospective employer desires to hire you?

    Tell your current employer that you are planing on leaving, what your goals are before your departure, and what you will do to achieve the goals.

    Sudden departures and unexplained, erratic career moves are for PUSSIES. PROFESSIONALS move up because they are good at what they do, and can tell other people about it from time to time.

  84. You act like you have an ownership stake - do you? by wren337 · · Score: 1

    It seems that the success or failure of the company is hinging on your loyalty. If that's really true you should expect some kind of equity stake if you stay. If your compensation is just conventional hourly and benefits you have to take the better opportunity.

  85. What are you not telling us ? by bugs2squash · · Score: 1

    or not telling yourself ?
    There must be something more. Your old company would get by without you, I'm sure they could phone you for help on occasions if they really got into a bind. This is an opportunity for the junior developers to perhaps progress a little to fill your shoes. After all there is no greater motivator that actually being responsible for something. There must be some other factor that gives you pause, something that it not as nebulous as "loyalty". Are you worried about spilling details to a competitor ?

    --
    Nullius in verba
  86. It's ok to be loyal to your friends... by Wooky_linuxer · · Score: 1

    But I wouldn't be loyal to the company. Ask yourself if the company had some kind of financial problem, would it have the same kind of consideration towards you? Or if they could hire a better developer than you for half your wages, would they do it? Your friends, if they are truly so, will still be friends. Now, money isn't everything and perhaps the environment in the new job is worse. But that aside, I'd never turn out a better job out of loyalty. No company would be as loyal to their employees (at least I haven't seen one yet).

    --
    Where is that guy who'd die defending what I had to say when I need him?
  87. It depends by ThinkDifferently · · Score: 1

    It's not always that way. I work in contracting for the US government. Moving from company A to company B is like changing from riding the bus to riding the train. It just doesn't matter who you work for, because your customer is the same.

    So, I guess it depends. Is company B promising you a career path, future training, a career? Or is just a cold call offer for a job and no other details? Ask more questions.

  88. My 2c by kakapo · · Score: 1

    I have known lots of loyal employers -- especially when you are talking about a small shop, rather than a big firm. Not everyone is a jackass.

    Moreover, loyalty cuts both ways - if (as a group) we don't give it, we cannot ask for it.

    That said, loyalty is a finite quantity. This is a firm with several employees and "management" so an extra 10k for one person should be within their grasp (or perhaps some sort of equity stake / profit sharing if cash flow is short before the launch) -- and if it really would break them, now is probably a good time to bail.

    Consequently, you should a) figure out what it would take to make you happy about staying and then b) be open with your current employer. Explain that you don't want to leave -- especially now -- but that you owe it to yourself (and your family, if that is an issue) to take this offer seriously, and that you are giving them a chance to respond. If they say no, or accuse you of holding them to ransom, or are otherwise obnoxious then you can leave in good conscience.

  89. Loyalty counts by DarthBobo · · Score: 1

    This is the most mercenary discussion I've seen on Slashdot, ever.

    If your employer isn't loyal to you (within reason) then you don't want to be there. Most of the organizations I have worked for - including some very big ones - actually do try to avoid laying people off in a downturn, at least skilled white-collar workers. In a knowledge industry if you burn your workers every knows and it gets tougher to hire in the future.

    You already know whats right for you - the other job. That means you need to leave - but doesn't mean leaving the current company (& coworkers!) in the lurch. Ask the new employer if they will give you a couple of months before you start; if so, get an offer letter with those terms. Seriously - I just hired a programmer and a project manager on these terms (2 months and 3 months respectively). They needed the time to close out projects, train new hires etc. I was impressed that they were loyal to their old employer - and presume they will leave me one day with the same grace and style. Their old employers (who couldn't match my offer) were pleased that they were willing to stay that long, and will in the future give them glowing recommendations - and might hire them back. Co-workers don't feel shafted etc. Did I want them sooner? Of course - but they were the right people and I'm willing to wait.

    Now, your current employer might tell you to stuff it, and to clear out your desk. Or that they will hire someone and they only want 2 weeks and then your out. Fine - you have been loyal and done your part, and the new employer presumably will take you sooner.

    Loyalty means doing your best in a hard situation, not picking between 2 weeks notice and staying forever.

    --
    +--------------------- You idiot! I told you we were facing the wrong way!
  90. Be honest by obi1one · · Score: 1

    If in your current position you consider higher management friends, you shouldn't be shy about being honest with them. Tell them your situation. If you have a real relationship with them, they will appreciate the honesty and the opportunity to try to do right by you and keep you for the long haul, rather than have you stick around for a short time out of 'loyalty' and feel bitter.

    Maybe they can offer to let you telecommute once or twice a week to save on your commute. Maybe they can give you a raise. Maybe they can't do anything, and will just wish you well. You'll never know if you don't give them the chance.

  91. Short Answer - Leave. Long answer - it depends. by offerk · · Score: 1
    The short answer is, based on my gut feeling - you should leave. Just remember, many people suffer from the delusion they are irreplaceable to their workplace - they are always wrong.

    The longer answer is:

    1. You state that even higher management are your friends. Just how good? Visit each other on weekends? Hang out in bars? Or just "treat you in a friendly manner in the office"?
    1.a. If it's the last, they are not true friends and you shouldn't give this "friendship" any weight whatsoever.
    1.b. If they really are good friends, tell them about the offer. A 7k raise and 40 minutes shorter commute are not trivial to pass up. If they care about you, they might actually advise you to take it, even if it hurts them temporarily.

    2. A 7k rise is a lot. If another company is willing to pay you such a hefty raise, you've been working for many years now at wages below what you could/should have been making. Why is the difference so large?
    2.a. If it's because you've passed up opportunities to get a raise, either by leaving or declining a promotion at your current company, you are of course to blame.
    2.b. If however as I suspect you simply haven't received (proper) pay raises at your current company for several years, thus putting you behind the curve, they have in effect been screwing you over. And make no mistakes, companies know *exactly* how much the going rate is for each programmer grade and seniority. So if they have been knowingly screwing you out of proper wages for several years, they are certainly no friends of yours.

    --
    I learn from all my mistakes, I intend to be a genius at the end of my life.
  92. Second that by mrops · · Score: 2

    On my first job out of university, I was loyal, stuck to a single company for about 4 years, at which point their product was purchased by another company and the dev team dropped like a hot potato.

    Few years down, I couldn't come to work on a weekend (after working 3 straight previous weekends without overtime pay), I was let go the following Thursday after I pissed off my boss after being threatened "I may not be fit for the organization", I'm glad I did, cause I wasn't.

    I started contracting and haven't looked back, get more pay, get paid for overtime and believe it or not, respected more and viewed as someone who has authority in my field, though I am the same person.

  93. There's a happiness factor too by ThinkDifferently · · Score: 2

    Cutting the commute alone is probably worth more than the 7k bump in salary to many people. Why? It makes them happier.

    Also consider this. Your employee/employer relationship is a business transaction. You deciding to leave or stay should be purely a business decision relative to your career and life. If it will improve your career and life, go for it.

  94. Having just been through something similar by SteelKidney · · Score: 1

    Let me reframe the question. Take loyalty out of the question, for a moment, ask yourself if the extra money is worth no longer working with people you really like. I've worked for people who shouldn't be managing anyone, much less IT people. I've worked in situations where developers were poorly regarded and treated badly. Not having to put up with crap like that is worth an offset in pay. How much of an offset is, of course, up to you. HTH. Heck- this is Slashdot. Hope this gets noticed. :)

  95. Negotiation: 101 by petes_PoV · · Score: 4, Insightful
    So you ask for a pay rise, almost certainly the response will be:
    "well, we don't have the budget to do anything now, but I'll <ahem> make sure you are rewarded when you review comes round in X months time."

    You're now in the worst possible situation. You've played your hand and got a commitment that almost certainly won't match the offer you have; either financially or in terms of commute, or wider opportunities in the new place. But it gets worse. You've also told your employer that you're willing to dump them - so you're now top of the list of people to sack - especially as the guy is at present training 2 more people (his replacements).

    Also, the "I've got a better offer" is only a ploy you can use once. So if you do stay, you are unlikely to ever get the chance to bluff for another payrise - and you can bet that in years to come any above-average rise will get brought back into line with below-par awards in coming years.

    --
    politicians are like babies' nappies: they should both be changed regularly and for the same reasons
    1. Re:Negotiation: 101 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Who said anything about a bluff? The advice I would like to add to yous is "don't make any ultimatums that you do not intend to follow through with". Know your terms in advance and don't back down. If you are asking for more money,don't make the issue about anything other than money. Maybe ask for the money and get an answer before even mentioning the other opportunity. If they do give in, don't let them think you may still be discontent. I'd they don't give in, mention the other job. If still, they do not, give your notice and don't entertain a counter offer.

    2. Re:Negotiation: 101 by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Simple, if they pull that BS you take the new job.

      If they give you any flack at all about coming to them with another offer you leave and never look back.

      The only way they get to keep you is buy coming up with the money.

      Down the road you will have to continue to leverage their asses. It's not like they were planning on giving you good raises until you forced their hand.

      If they claim they can't afford it, you might consider giving them the option of paying with stock (many other considerations involved), don't let them give you a long 'vest date'. Just leave if they try that BS.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    3. Re:Negotiation: 101 by Lost+Race · · Score: 2

      So you ask for a pay rise, almost certainly the response will be: "well, we don't have the budget to do anything now, but I'll make sure you are rewarded when you review comes round in X months time."

      You're now in the worst possible situation.

      No, you're in the best possible situation. The old company has rejected your very modest request and you move with a clear conscience to the new company for a nice pay raise and no more commute.

      [other nonsense snipped]

      Are you even reading the same story as the rest of us? That all seems completely irrelevant.

      BTW, this is not the time to ask for a pay raise, unless you just want an excuse to leave. This is the time to ask for a substantial share of the company and a big promotion. Since it's a small company, vice president seems appropriate. If the company will certainly fail without you then this is a no-brainer for the owners. Once again, all they can do is say no; you shrug and leave with a clear conscience for greener pastures.

      The worst possible thing you can do is stay where you are out of "loyalty" without making it perfectly clear to coworkers, management, and shareholders what you're sacrificing for their sake, and getting a real commitment of loyalty in return from them. If they don't understand why you're staying they might see your "loyalty" as weakness (afraid to try a new job) and feel free to abuse you in the future. Their commitment is best expressed in some tangible form that's obvious to everyone.

    4. Re:Negotiation: 101 by King_TJ · · Score: 1

      I don't know if that's an "almost certain" response, but it's definitely a possible one. So what? You don't go in trying to bargain until you've got the other job lined up and ready to go anyway. If you weren't really sure you HAD the new job yet and you tried this, you deserve what you get.

      I agree completely though, that the old line about "We'll see what we can do for you after the next performance review comes up." is bogus. I've heard a variation of that in at least 3 different jobs I've worked, and in EACH case, I never saw any of the promised pay raises come to fruition. (One time, it was even part of the initial hiring promise. "We'll start you out at X, but don't worry. Our plan in to get you up to Y in the next year or two by adding on a little bit during the performance reviews." Guess what? They didn't even DO most of those reviews, and had excuses for why they couldn't afford to pay more "at this exact time", any time it was questioned.)

      IMO, if a company is serious, they'll give you a raise effectively immediately. Anything else means no, they don't *really* value you enough to come up with whatever they're promising in some round-about way. Let's face it.... Most companies on anything resembling stable footing have the ability to get bank loans, if nothing else. If they really want to keep you, they can take out a loan to cover some other expenditure so the money in the bank is freed up for your payroll, even if they really don't have the funds on-hand to do it. That's what you can BET they'd do for some random asset they decided was important enough to them -- like a replacement company car or new machine to put out in the shop, or ??

    5. Re:Negotiation: 101 by ShakaUVM · · Score: 1

      >>Also, the "I've got a better offer" is only a ploy you can use once.

      Who says? Get the offer in writing, and show it to your boss if they don't believe you.

      I had a former friend/boss/manager (who now works at Facebook of all places), who did this about once a year, and got a raise every time. I was an intern, and certainly couldn't do all the stuff he did. But he was a very smart guy, with a skillset that not many people had in the mid-1990s (OpenGL coding, and in particular, writing flight simulator software) which meant that competing companies were always trying to hire him, and at increasing offers every year.

      After about five years, my company decided to not make their annual raise/counteroffer to him, and so he went to work for the competitor at a substantial salary increase.

    6. Re:Negotiation: 101 by Tom · · Score: 1

      That's why you don't ask for a raise.

      When asking for more money, always say why - because you've improved, you've got new responsibilities, the last project went exceptionally well, etc. etc. - never allow them to retreat to some generic, anything-goes field of uncertainty. If they try, ask questions. Ask what the decision will depend upon, if they need all information, and the most important question: If they make any promises whatsoever, ask if you can get them in writing.

      And if you're in a situation where you must make a decision now - tell them that you need an answer now. Explain why, at least as much as you're comfortable with.

      I disagree on the "top of the list" part. If you play your cards right and say the right words, you can turn an impression of "the guy's going where the money is" into "he got a better offer, but he likes it here so he's giving us a chance to keep him".

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  96. They would lay you off to save $1 by saintjo · · Score: 1

    Would the company lay you off to save $1? Yes. If you you said no, you are kidding yourself. Do what is best for you and your family.

  97. This is Not Your Company by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately, they are still a long way from grasping the technologies used – not to mention the 'interesting' job the outsourced developers managed to make of the code.

    Let me get this straight: you're working for someone who is about to release a flagship project, but the code is a mess and you've got 2 members of staff and the only person who really knows about it is you.

    Now I'll explain what your real situation is: you're filling in for your management being not very good. Those guys aren't putting in a real investment, and through your efforts you're keeping them going.

    So, the question to you is this: what are you getting for being a crucial part of their company? You see, I've seen this dozens of times... people who work 8am to 7pm every day because the work needs doing without telling the management to go screw themselves when the management refuse to get more staff in. People who earn little more than the people doing 9 to 5.

    Regardless of another job, I would go to these guys and suggest they make you a director, or put you on share options for your work.

  98. My thoughts and advice by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

    Let's assume you are going to take the new job. I'd try to make the move as gracefully as possible by:

    1. Explain your situation to the new company. Explain you don't want to leave your old company in a bind but want to take their offer. find out how flexible they are in start dates. Also find out what's the earliest you can start if step 2 falls apart. If they are a decent company , they'll appreciate that you are not the type of person to bail out and leave someone in a bind, since at some point you may leave them as well.

    2. Explain to your current company the situation - you will be leaving and want to engineer a smooth transition as well as be around for the initial launch hiccups. Work out a date within the time the new company gave you. If they sack you, leave and start at the new one.

    3. If they counter, then you have to decide what is best for you.

    Many posters talk about the lack of company loyalty to employees. Yes, it is true. I've been there and it sucks. But I caution you - separate the company from the people who work there. Not only are they friends, they are potential employers / employees / references / job leads in the future. They will appreciate your trying to do the right thing even if "the company" doesn't. Don't waste the trust and relationships you've built up over the years. It's bad personally and professionally; not to mention bad karma - a /. -1 is a joke, but a -1 in real life isn't. As a valued mentor pointed out to me: most businesses live in a small pond, just because someone else pee'd in it doesn't mean you need to remembered for doing it as well.

    I've stayed friends with people who have had to make business decisions that negatively impacted me. I don't take this etchings personally, and prefer to take the high road. They appreciate it, and I feel good about who and what I am.

    the only time you should burn your bridges behind you is if you are leading a powerful army on a mission of conquest and want to clearly show the choices are victory or death.

    --
    I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
  99. No it doesn't ! by rrey · · Score: 1

    First, tell them about the concurrency proposal and see what they say, they could adjust your salary to keep you inside the walls. If they don't, don't wait, they think you are not important in the company and your loyalty will never pay.

  100. Leave by sydbarrett74 · · Score: 1

    If you were a partner/cofounder, it would be one thing. But since you're 'merely' an employee, your ultimate loyalty is to yourself. Put in your two weeks' notice and expedite the training of the junior developers. It sounds like you have already been a conscientious and diligent worker -- you don't owe your employer anything else, except the courtesy of a formal notice of resignation. Many may call it harsh, but do you really think they'd give a second thought to making you redundant if business went south?

    --
    'He who has to break a thing to find out what it is, has left the path of wisdom.' -- Gandalf to Saruman
  101. There's a difference. by Millennium · · Score: 1

    Being loyal does indeed pay, but only when both sides act in good faith. Allowing yourself to be taken advantage of is another matter entirely.

    In other words, it sounds like you need more information. If your current employer acting in good faith, or merely taking advantage of you? Find this out -there are many posts in this thread already detailing how you might go about this- and then make your choice.

  102. From the other side... by mubes · · Score: 1

    I've been in situations where I've been on the other side of the table to this, and lost developers 'cos they got a better offer. I've been as mad as hell about it, not because they've walked, but because I took my eye off the ball for long enough for the problem to develop...the irritation was with myself, not the guy walking. As it happens, the one guy I lost that I _really_ didn't want to was back 12 months later - when he and I finally worked out the issues that he'd been suffering in the first place.

    The first thing I would do is wander into your boss' office, shut the door and have an off-the-record conversation with him/her. Explain the issues and tell them why you're considering moving and what needs to change. Be careful to phrase this as a "We have a problem, how can we work to solve it?" conversation rather than a "I'm leaving unless you fix these problems" conversation otherwise it sounds like blackmail. The fact is, you do feel some loyalty and obligation to your company and/or co-workers....so give that some rope and see what happens.

    If the company you're working for has any sense and if you're any cop (and your boss is worth his salt), then they'll find a way to work with you to make you comfortable to stay. If not, or if you don't feel you even have the kind of relationship where you can have that closed door chat, then walk, you're losing nothing.

    Note that opinions and attitudes to work vary widely across the world; you'll hear the mercenary "Do what's best for your money" at one extreme and the "Stay, it can't be that bad" at the other. The fact is that you have to do what's right for you, but you should always be able to look your ex-colleagues and bosses in the eye when you meet them in the pub later...

    Quite happy to chat further on this if its useful, but /. open forum isn't the right place.

  103. Re:No loyalty by delinear · · Score: 1

    The other thing to consider is, if they're already paying him 7k less than what he's obviously worth, what does that say about their opinion of him as a valued employee? Most employers will be your friend if they think it'll help keep their costs down. You can only find out how they really feel when you ask for what you're worth.

  104. Re:Sometimess, but... by tomhudson · · Score: 1

    That depends. IT (at least in Canada) is a fairly small community.

    Are you kidding? Where do you live, Flin Flon, Manitoba; Dildo, Newfoundland; St-Louis-de-Ha-Ha, Quebec; Tiny, Ontario; Smuts, Saskatchewan; Seven Persons, Alberta, or Horsefly, British Columbia ? (Yes, they all exist).

    Try moving to one of the larger cities, you know, a place with a few million people.

  105. Negotiation time! by PoopCat · · Score: 1

    Sounds like you're in a good position to negotiate some new benefits. If your current employer won't pay you any more, how about a few more weeks of holiday? How about a 60% work-from-home policy? Think creatively, if you want to stay. A few tips:

    1. Be prepared to walk.
    2. Keep things civil.
    3. Don't mention any specifics - say "I have an offer from another company that will pay me significantly more than I make here. What can you offer me to stay?" and work from there. If your current boss asks how much the pay raise would be if you left, say "enough to make me seriously consider their offer".
    4. Ask for more than you really want.
    5. Let the other guy talk himself up to your level, never talk yourself down to his.

  106. There is no such thing as corporate loyalty! by billybob_jcv · · Score: 1

    Don't be a sap - the company would dump you in a heartbeat if the accountants told them it was advantageous to the bottom line. But don't forget - so would the new company. So - the *real* question you should be asking yourself is: How stable is the new company? Why is there an opening, and why are they willing to pay you? Does the new company have a history of ramping up and down with their shifting sales revenue? When was their last downsizing? Just because they are "bigger" does not mean they are more stable. If you leave now, and 6 months from now the new company decides they don't need you - what will you do then? If you can live with the worst case scenario, then go for it - money in the hand is better than any company's promise.

    And yes, I know how this works from experience - I was laid-off 8 months after doing exactly the same thing you are contemplating, and now I'm screwed with no opportunity to go back to my old job and (so far) no new offers. If I had considered more carefully the terrible history of the new company for ramping up and down, I think I might have stayed where I was - but I didn't!

  107. Profit sharing by Quila · · Score: 1

    If you are indispensible, and the flagship product is about to be released, how about negotiating a chunk of the action instead of more pay? In a public company this could materialize as stock options, not sure about a small private company.

  108. Some advice I was once given by mknewman · · Score: 1

    This came from a consultant that was hired to process us out when I was laid off from Texas Instruments. She said "There is no such thing as Company Loyalty. A company has no loyalty to you, so why should you have loyalty to your company?" Look out for #1, take the higher paying job which is closer and enjoy your newly found money and time. Wish your friends the best, tell them you will help them out as needed on a contract basis (nights and weekends), and see if they make a counter offer to the new job.

  109. Happiness. by Xacid · · Score: 2

    Happiness is what I'd measure out. Also - something not mentioned is at what stage of your career you're in.

    As for happiness - is your commute time stripping you of valuable time with your family? I have a similar commute and I'm used to it - but I also have some flexibility with my hours and can work from home at times. Those little perks there make up for the commute for me.

    As for salary - is that 7k going to make a huge difference to you? After taxes&benefits (based on USA rates) that'll be roughly 400/mo or translates to a little over 3.36/hr before taxes. Huge difference if you're making 100k/yr vs 30k/yr.

    Another thing - does this new job open up any new doors for you? In my case - I've plateaued in regards to what I can learn and do here so that's my main motivation for wanting to look elsewhere.

    For me I'd measure out my priorities. I'm in my early-mid stages of my career so I still have a fair amount of momentum to be used up. Commute isn't a huge priority. Salary I can stand to remain the same. I'm just not learning/doing much else, thus not allowing much else I can add to my resume, and that's the kicker for me.

    1. Re:Happiness. by Xacid · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the conversion!

      As for the 40 hours tech = 3 day work week, that just makes me cry a little on the inside. I've got to say I've been damned fortunate I haven't gotten snared into that one.

    2. Re:Happiness. by spouse · · Score: 1

      Absolutely the most important aspect here is happiness in my opinion. Even as manager of you I wouldn't prefer you to be loyal. If you after many years loyal service find something better which is closer to your home and pays higher, you should try to get a contract offer. When you hold the contract in your hands, tell your old employer about the situation openly, smile at them and tell them that it was always nice to feel loyal for so many years but that you found something better you would like to follow. You have meny good reasons that every good manager will understand. In case they do not understand: it's not your problem, and it probably only is show to make you stay. You will see your managers' true self in that sitation, test him/her. Do not blame yourself for bad decisions of your former managers. It is not your fault that they waited so long to find backups for your knowhow. In the end, they might fire you if a little project is failing or some customers go down. That what counts is that you contribute to a good business case that ensures your furture income.

  110. Two questions by goathumper · · Score: 1

    There are two questions you need to ask yourself:

    • Will the company show YOU the same loyalty you're showing the company?
    • Will you be happy enough on the new job that you won't miss the old one?

    In the end it all boils down to quality of life, a.k.a.: happiness. Does your current job make you happy? Do you look forward to going into work every day? That your job makes you happy may sound naïve to some, so let's sum it up as this: does going to work amount to a positive experience for you that you are (at least!) content to partake in?

    To me, for example, the happiness is the kicker - if you can't guarantee yourself that you'll be happy enough in the new job that you won't miss your old one, then don't leave. Sure you'll be getting more money, saving on gas and time, and not dealing with the "long" commute... but if you're going to be miserable doing it, all you'll really be doing is giving up quality of life - and that tends to be fairly hard to come by once given up.

    Note that I didn't mention how you would measure "happy with your current job" - that's something deeply personal that only you can ascertain. The key thing is: the level of happiness you expect in the new job must be sufficient that you won't miss your old one. Note that I don't say that you must be as happy as, or happier than... you just have to be happy enough that you won't want to go back.

  111. Understanding by archen · · Score: 1

    That said, I can't help but feel that to leave now would be betraying my friends and colleagues.

    Assuming they're not self absorbed, and they're truly friends I'm pretty sure they'd understand. If the company is in such a bad spot when one person leaves, they're not set up well for disasters anyway. What if you got hit by a bus? I agree with a post above that offering to do training / consulting would be a good way to transition out, even if it means a lot of work in the immediate future.

    Everyone else here brings up the pay, but I think cutting commute time would be a much bigger deal to me and an opportunity that will likely never present itself again.

  112. Long Term by Tteddo · · Score: 1

    Speaking as someone who was fired from every job I ever held (self employed now- 14 years), you need to think long term. You have developed relationships with your current employer and the people who work there and you never know where those people will turn up in the future. I have customers that I used to work for that I never thought I would see again in a million years because of how I left. But you do have to put yourself first. Removing 90 minutes of commute time a day and more money is a great step up. Just treat the current employer with respect, maybe really try to help with the transition.

  113. Tough choices by bogibear · · Score: 1

    In 26 years, I've worked for 6 organizations and have held a variety of positions from server admin to senior developer. So loyalty means a lot to me.

    Certain factors have to weigh in to the desire to make a change, because the grass isn't always greener on the other side of the fence.

    Adequate challenge - I have to feel that I am challenged. I could never be a button pusher, I have to feel that I'm utilizing my skills and constantly learning and developing new skills. Do I get to use new, cool technologies or are we in the dark ages? I have told nearly every manager, director, and

    o Job satisfaction - Do I like my job or dread waking up in the morning because I know I have to go back to that place?

    o How I was treated by the company - Do they treat me well? Are there perks like working at home a day or two a week? Does the company constantly screw with their employees? Do they work me like a dog or respect me enough to allow me to retain (some) sanity? Do they respect their employees?

    o Stability of the company / profitability - How stable is the organization? Are they going to be here tomorrow or are they slashing everything to try to stay in business? Is senior management accessible and open to the state of the company? Is management properly involved?

    o Salary - I like money. I would like to have a million dollars, take it all in singles, put it in a pool, and take a swim. If I have to sell my soul and work like a dog for an idiot boss in a crappy company, it's not worth it.

    o Other factors - Commute, perks like flexible schedule, work from home, vacation, and decent hardware (like a good laptop).

    Consider what your dream job is. Is your dream job the place you are at or the place that is recruiting you? Is the new job a stepping stone to greater things or just a lateral change? Can you make your existing place of work your dream job?

    At the end of the day, the person you work for is you. Loyalty is important, but you don't need to stay so loyal as to stunt your career. Consider your options carefully. Talk to management, see what kind of plans they have for you. If you aren't satisfied, then the decision is easier to make.

    Good luck to you in your decision.

  114. Re:You're a virgin! by goathumper · · Score: 1

    I would have to disagree with much of what you say here, at least in the case of smaller companies. I've been fucked as much as the next guy (I think). And while I agree that your thinking is accurate when dealing with larger or somewhat politicized organizations, most smaller shops haven't yet succumbed to the corruption you speak of. If you've not been fucked, then don't act like you have... this is just me trying to see the glass half-full until proven otherwise (innocent until proven corrupt, anyone?).

    I for one know of a small shop that got acquired a couple of years back in deep financial trouble. Everyone got fucked one way or the other. And I mean EVERYONE. Yet because of how things are run and their ability to insulate themselves from the parent company's policies, idiocy and bureaucracy, they are still fanatically loyal to each other as a group because they still run the shop the way they like it. That's an exception to the general rule of acquisitions, I know, but it also highlights the example that just because your cherry has been popped, you shouldn't assume everyone walking behind you has their dick in their hand waiting for you to drop your guard so they can play poke-the-stinker.

  115. You may get paid more but keep one thing in mind.. by CFBMoo1 · · Score: 1

    I've heard plenty of stories of people taking up better jobs only to be unemployed a few months later because of lousy bosses, company going under, etc. Everyone says screw it and take the offer but make sure it'll be around for you and the new people are people you can deal with.

    --
    ~~ Behold the flying cow with a rail gun! ~~
  116. Maybe loyal to a fault by djchristensen · · Score: 1

    Being loyal is admirable, but it can easily go too far. I felt the same way as you do now, all the way up until I was laid off. While looking for a new job, I've found that I was being paid at the low end of the scale, and even though I was the only "expert" in the areas I was working on, I was let go simply because I was not working out of the main offices (or out of India).

    You need to seriously consider how much loyalty your company has to you. You don't work for your colleagues or even your direct manager, you work for the company. If the loyalty isn't nearly equivalent in both directions, then you need to bring it into balance on your end, which most likely means scaling back your own sense of loyalty.

  117. Re:You're a virgin! by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

    in our grandparents' era, a lot of people worked for only one or two companies, never got fucked at all, and retired without ever knowing what it's like.

    In Happy Rose Colored La La Land maybe. In the real world, not so much.

  118. Re:It's a business decision by pchasco · · Score: 1

    I've faced the same issue, and I chose to leave. It's a business decision. When it comes down to it, your employer would let you go if it made business sense. Businesses, successful ones at least, are only truly loyal to themselves and work toward their own interests. Every employee should do the same, in my opinion.

    This was me. I forgot to log in... Oops!

  119. As a small tech company owner... by Aquitaine · · Score: 2

    If you worked for me, I would certainly appreciate the opportunity to keep you, and I wouldn't feel bitter in the least if you came to me and said 'x company is offering more money to do the same thing and it's a better fit with my life.' Yes, if I'm a douchebag, I can agree to match or beat their offer and then quietly seek to replace you, but a company's reputation among its employees hits the toilet pretty fast the moment everybody stops trusting the boss. It's my job to make sure that nobody ever stops and asks 'would Aquitaine try to replace me just because I made him match an offer another company made?'

    When I hire somebody, I definitely want the opportunity to earn their loyalty -- but I know that they, like everybody, have an obligation to themselves and to their families to do right by all of them, and that's tough when they're in competition with one another. So I don't think you 'owe' your current employer any more than the customary two weeks' notice unless you feel that they've really gone the extra mile on your behalf in the past, which some small businesses will do. Even then, I'd rather have a valuable employee realize it's time to move on than regret not having done so and turn into a rotten, depressed employee.

  120. What being loyal got me by abigsmurf · · Score: 1

    £16K salary after 3 years. Sole developer of an enterprise level PHP tool. Sole PHP coder full stop.

    Not bad enough? I'm currently working at home because my pay is going to be 2 weeks late and I now can't afford the petrol.

    And now for the real kicker to top it off? I've overheard them talking to each other about version 2.0 of the product, they've not mentioned this to me and the guy who basically is in charge of new development hasn't spoken to me in months. I've overheard them talking to a friend who handles outsourcing and 'Belarus' was mentioned a few times.

    Still, I've now got strong Drupal development skills and looking at job sites, Drupal is gold dust at the moment so when the inevitable does happen or if I'm able to build up a financial cushion. I shouldn't do too bad.

    tldr: if you're a nice guy, you get fucked. Don't leave in a nasty way (try to ensure they've a replacement, ask new bosses if they will be ok with you offering occasional tech support if they need it) but being loyal and nice will get you screwed 95% of the time as a coder because small businesses don't realise how good they have it with you.

  121. It's just business. by Toolsmith · · Score: 1

    Do the right thing. Do what is right for you and your family at the particular point in time of your life. There will always be projects, and if your current company treats you well, that's great. As you know, especially in the UK, there are lots of layoffs happening. You may be totally loyal to the company, yet the company may lay you off. It's just business. And it will be out of your control. Training the 'juniors' is a way to help hand down your skills to the cheaper staff. Outsourcing programming jobs is getting easier, and your job may end up being outsourced in India or China. On the other hand, more money, closer commute, similar type of job - these are very attractive attributes of the new job. You will save 45 minutes in commuting time. As you put it - a massive difference in your life. DO IT!

  122. not completely a no-brainer by durdur · · Score: 1

    IMO there are advantages to being a long-timer at one job. If the company is growing and you have stock options, you will do well, over time. Also if the company is placing you into more senior roles over time you will gain from that too (and not just monetarily, but in terms of valuable experience and job satisfaction). If you are not getting these upsides from staying then that is a reason to be bail.

  123. Here's what to do: by gnasher719 · · Score: 1

    You check out the new company and check whether they can be trusted. You check how much notice you have to give. You get a contract with the new company accordingly. You give notice, giving your reasons, without burning bridges if at all possible. See how they react. Depending on their reaction you might now know that you made the right decision.

    Your old company can use your salary to hire an experienced developer again, so they shouldn't be doing too badly, and it's not your fault anyway. They could have given you some extra money, right?

    Not burning bridges is important because (a) it is the professional thing to do and you don't want to damage your reputation, (b) you never know when you meet people again, and (c) you might want to go back. (Cases that I know of, the shortest time between starting a job and being fired was 10 minutes, the shortest time between starting a new job and calling the old company was also 10 minutes). About (b): A recommended business strategy is to keep some notes about any employees that leave. Some you might want to call if you hire again in case they want to come back, others you might want to hire back by mistake.

  124. The shorter commute alone is worth the move. by James-NSC · · Score: 1

    As someone who recently went from a ~50+ minute commute to a six minute commute (door to door) it’s worth it, that alone makes it worth it. That's the most valuable factor in the entire equation. I got ~+10 hours a week of my life back that I used to spend in a car. Ten. The amount of *life* I've regained, and its corresponding value, is incalculable. It's worth much more than an extra 7K/year - I'd consider the extra money as a nice bonus, the real value in this job offer is in the amount of your life you're going to get back.

    The vast number of other /.’rs are right, we’re talking about companies, where there is no such thing as loyalty or friends *especially* between upper management and worker bees. It’s about money and greed. Period. Full stop. If they have two trained jr. developers who combined make less than you (in all forms of compensation: vacation time, medical/pension and other employer contributions, etc) then they will, in all likelihood, fire you as soon as they think those two can hold that ship afloat with the outsourced developers. I’d expect that to happen shortly after the product is launched. Unless you have shares in the company or will make beans should the product you’ve been working on takes off, then you have no stake in their game. If they really need you, they'll pay to keep you - but if they do, I think it will increase the likelihood that you're training your replacements - but are you absolutely sure you aren't already doing that?

    UconnGuy is 100% right about how to tell if they truly are your friends or not when you tell them about the offer. If they really are “friends”, they’ll want you to get an extra $7k/year and +~10 hours a week of your life back, as friends want what's best for you not what's best for the company. XxtraLarGe also has a very good suggestion, you can offer to stay on as a consultant. It could be for a transitional period or as long as you/they want, and with the extra ~+10 hours a week, you’re going to have *plenty* of time to do that consulting work!

    Take the new job as long as you have some level of confidence that it’s a stable move and your new employer isn’t at risk for downsizing anytime soon as you’ll be the first to go if they do. Bottom line is this: time is something they’re always making more of but something you’ll never have enough of & the amount of *life* you’ll get back that you used to spend commuting will be worth infinitely more than the $7k pay rise is.

  125. Loyalty pays off - but just to a point by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Loyalty to a company is valuable. Not as much for the relation between you and the company itself, but more for the relationship between you, your co-workers, and your managers - people remember and appreciate when you were loyal and helpful even when you ddi not have (or want) to be. It doesn't matter as much in the company you are in now, but it might help you get a job later as co-workers move on to other places.

    That said. I think you should absolutely change jobs. Loyalty is good to a point but anyone reasonable would understand why this change was so much better for you, they would not lose any respect for you making this change. Also personal growth is important and changing jobs can help with that as long as you do not do so too often.... and imagine what 80 minutes every day of increased personal time is worth, that is invaluable.

    Even if the new job didn't work out you could probably go back. Just change.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  126. Take the new job. by AugstWest · · Score: 1

    There are no words to describe the increase in your quality of life when you remove the commute. None. You'll be in awe of what life is actually like.

    Definitely don't burn bridges, and handle it as responsibly as possible, but opportunities are opportunities, and you need to take the good ones when they come up.

    Your job is not your life, your life is not your job.

  127. Research the business. by micronicos · · Score: 1

    My experience is that if the market you are working in is expanding rapidly, then changing companies is the way to go. I quadrupled my salary in three years changing companies four times, OK, this was computer field trouble-shooting in the oilfield in the Far East, in the boom times of the 1970s (HP & DEC minis). These were US companies & I actually returned to one after leaving them, there were no hard feelings, they knew they were lucky to get me back.

    Much later I had to re-enter the same business during a fairly static period, things weren't going down, they were just not expanding. I felt I was lucky to get the job I was offered & stuck with it for four years until I had a consultancy offer, which I took, the consultancy business in that field was expanding & starting to use personal computers... was a good move then.

    My point is you have to look at what is happening in the market/business you have your core skill set in. If the new company needs you to bird-dog a project & that project sells but not that well, as last in you might be first out. Let alone if that project bombs.

    Don't generalise & do your research.

    --
    Nico M, London, GB.
  128. i was in a similar situation recently by sammy+baby · · Score: 1

    Wow, this hits close to home.

    I recently left my old position in a very large company, working with some people I really liked, to jump to another division within the same company. My pay, commute, and benefits are identical. But I'm working on different stuff, in support of different products, with a different group of people. And because I'm still in the same company, I hear from my old coworkers daily, and know that they're experiencing a not insignificant amount of pain over my leaving.

    I feel slightly crappy about this. But in the end I wound up moving for two big reasons:

    1. I was enjoying the work less and less, and felt the need to try something different. (An increasing amount of my work related to tools & methodology and configuration management, and I just didn't find it interesting.)
    2. I was frustrated with a career which seemed to be stagnating for the last five years.

    I didn't even get a raise out of my jump - you'd be getting a substantial raise, plus a drastically shortened commute. Make your exit as professional and painless as you can, but for god's sake, go.

    1. Re:i was in a similar situation recently by plopez · · Score: 1

      Good reasons to leave. As far as the pain you caused, offer to act as a resource. Don't actually work on the project but offer insights, advice, suggestions, reviews of problem solving approaches etc. Make sure both your old and new supervisor knows of it. It is the professional thing to do and makes you look good in the eyes of management. If you are already doing it, good. Then anyone reading this post should consider this advice.

      I even did this when I left a company completely. Though I didn't tell the new boss. It helped my networking with my former colleges, which is always important for references and job hunting.

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
  129. Rule #1 by hondo77 · · Score: 1

    You owe your company an honest day's work for a day's pay and that is all. You do not owe them your loyalty. Maybe that made sense decades ago but not anymore.

    --
    I live ze unknown. I love ze unknown. I am ze unknown.
  130. Platonic Loyalty vs. Business loyalty by Daniel+Kirksey · · Score: 1

    As the reasonable and competent man sitting on the other side of the table I understand the difference between "loyalty" in perhaps the Platonic sense and "business loyalty." In business, “loyalty” is almost always a two-way street, and virtues don’t have intrinsic value—often times reduced to a monetary value unfortunately. So, if I were in your shoes my reasoning/decision process would probably try to give my current employer a "handicap" so to speak—meaning I might take the beneficial proximity of the new company’s location to my home out of the equation as a token of my "loyalty" to my current employer—be sure to convert this benefit to monetary terms (fuel, wear and tear on vehicle, missed hourly earning potential during commute time, etc.) for your own knowledge and for your employer’s, so that he/she can see in more tangible terms exactly what you might sacrifice on their behalf. Apart from that however, you can bet I would expect a pay raise pretty damn close to the new company’s offer. Just be honest with yourself and employer in the decision process so that everyone knows exactly WHY you’re making the decision you’re making, and be sure to clearly communicate how your own loyalty to the company is playing a role in your decision making process—this will likely prevent regrets on your part regardless of how it all turns out, and hard feelings on theirs. All assuming a reasonable and competent other-side-of-the-table of course!

  131. I say leave... by sco_robinso · · Score: 1

    As a sysadmin. I've been in this situation a couple times over the past 6-7 years. Usually working for smaller companies (less then 500 people), after 2-3 years, it's not terribly difficult for me to find a job somewhere else that pays high-4 or low-5 figures more.

    I've always leaned on the side of moving to make more. I'm not the type of person to blindly chase $$, but when it gets into the high four figure (or low 5 figure) point, it's tough not to say no. That;s not to say I jump on any old position that comes by, I still make my moves carefully... The way I see it, it's just too much money to give up. Unless I was working for immediate family (which I never have, not even distant family), the feeling of guilt of leaving the place usually subsides very quickly. If they can't keep up with market rate for my position, tough beans for them.

  132. overtime? by whitroth · · Score: 1

    14 years ago, I was working with a group that was among the best and brightest I ever worked with.. My managers and I *liked* each other (no PHB bosses, there - the PHB was in another team....)

    According to a close friend, who's also a degreed, practicing clinical psychologist, I was *that* close to clinical burnout.

    How many hours is your usual day, or week? Is it over 50 hrs/wk? 60? How tired are you?

    I hated leaving them, but exhaustion won out (and my ...late... wife being only semi-joking about suing them for alienation of affection). Will the new job be as good as the old... or more exhausting, and more and more hours? Remember, whatever management thinks, you're working to live, not living to work for them.

                        mark

  133. a simple guideline. by Kashgarinn · · Score: 1

    Follow these instructions right now, don't read further then the step you've taken:

    1) Find a coin

    2) Decide what heads and tails will be

    3) Flip the coin.

    4) look at the result as the final result.

    5) Are you happy with that result? If answer is yes, that's your decision. If answer is no, then pick the other option.

    1. Re:a simple guideline. by plopez · · Score: 1

      Here's my method:

      1) Find a coin

      2) Decide what heads and tails will be

      3) Flip the coin.

      4) DO NOT look at the result as the final result.

      Often when the coin is in the air you find yourself secretly wishing for something. When you are having trouble deciding, that is your true desire.

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
  134. I tend to be loyal too by greywire · · Score: 1

    I am a loyal employee as well, generally. But in my years of working, I've been royally screwed three times in return for my loyalty (including just recently). But more often then not, I get handed opportunities because the people I work with want to continue working with me in some fashion. Being fair, loyal, and producing good work does pay off.

    But, don't be a sucker either. Any reasonable person will understand if you have to make a hard choice because its the right choice for you and your family. I've done that, and it always plays out well. Be fair, make some compromises if needed, but remember whats really important in life.

    Now if I can just remember how to change the signature below..

    --
    -- Senior Software Engineer, Attorney appearance services, locallawyerapp.com.
    1. Re:I tend to be loyal too by greywire · · Score: 1

      Ah, good. It changes everywhere! Good Slashdot! Now I dont have to worry about any old postings containing a reference to a screwed company I used to work for.

      --
      -- Senior Software Engineer, Attorney appearance services, locallawyerapp.com.
  135. Re:You're a virgin! by n7ytd · · Score: 1

    I'm just now entertaining a job offer from a prospective new employer.
    There is the normal risk involved with making a move to a new employer, but one of the factors that is steering me away from taking the offer is the attitude that the director I would be working for had towards his current employees. When interviewing with him, his plans for the future involve adding many "resources" to the department. Not people; resources.

    The quality of people that I work with and for currently is the largest reason I've stayed where I am up to now. They don't pay the best, but being treated as a human and working with legitimate friends rather than within forced relationships is worth a lot.

    That being said, I have no illusions that the company would have any problem getting rid of me if the balance sheet said so. I have no loyalty to the company, just to the people I work immediately with.

  136. Tell them by Scarred+Intellect · · Score: 1

    My mother went through a similar situation. Sort of.

    It went like this: She got a job offer at a company (B) that had better offices, a more interesting aspect of the same job, giving her more importance at the company, more respect, and significantly more money.

    She told her boss where she worked (company A) that she got this job offer and was considering it.

    Boss A counter-offered with more money. She considered.

    Company B counter-offered with more money. She considered.

    A counter-offered, B counter-offered...each time she'd tell the other company what the new offer was, and finally decided after 4 counter-offers to go with Company B.

    So my advice would be to tell your colleagues and friends that you've received this offer. Tell them it's extremely tempting (do it over a beer or something) because it's more money and gives you way more time during your day, but you understand the burden it would place on your existing company and friends/colleagues.. I think, especially in an informal setting like a few drinks, it would naturally move to how it would affect your current company, and maybe what they can do for you.

    I am an extremely firm believer that communication easily eliminates over 95% of people's problems with each other. If you communicate this to your current company, and it goes extremely bad, the decision is made; that's the worst that happens. The best is that you get the companies fighting over you like my mother and get to pick the best for you.

    Also, unless these are going to be friends for many, many years, do what YOU have to do. What YOU want to do. Sometimes you have to take care of Number 1 first.

    Hope this was helpful

  137. Reciprocity is the answer. by samael · · Score: 1

    Depends how you've been treated.

    If the company has gone out of its way in the past to look after you, then treat them likewise. At the least, you could see if a two month changeover would make their life easier (if the new company would be willing to do that).

    If you've been treated as just another employee, then behave that way.

  138. Turn in your resignation, give them 2 weeks. by Tharsman · · Score: 1

    First, no matter how bad you think they will be, they will mange without you. They wont be working as smoothly but they will move ahead.

    It's easy to think you are more vital than you really are just because you know every tiny intricacy of a system or THE system. Truth is, most capable developers will be able to, within reasonable time, catch up with you. Sometimes even a fresh mind may improve upon things that old ways of thinking didnt. I been at both ends of that reality. It's just the way things are.

    Just be as polite as possible, if they approach asking why, you can tell them details of the offer and note that it would just not be wise to take such an offer as it's an increadible career advancement path. Offer as much help as you can, spend the next two weeks writing documentation, be as throughout as you can and helpful. In the future, this employer may be contacted for references so you dont want to be rude either. You want to make sure they can't say anything bad about you. Tell them you love the job, but you must think of your future.

    They MAY ask you something along the lines of "what can we do to keep you?". At that point you can ask something along the lines of them matching the pay rate, but (if you are in a large company) it may not happen due to pay increase policies.

    But answering the title: No, it does not pay to be loyal. Actually, being loyal is very expensive and comes out of your pocket. What pays is to be polite, efficient, helpful and making job transitions as smoth as you can for your old employer.

  139. What about you? by ibib · · Score: 1

    Your only REAL loyalty is to yourself. Make the choice that will make your life better. It's as "easy" as that.

  140. We are ALL temporary employees by Moof123 · · Score: 1

    Right after a layoff, that is what our head of engineering told those of us remaining standing. It has forever put my relationship with my employers in stark relief.

    In this brutal capitalist world our loyalty is bought in 2 week increments. If the company decides to buy it longer, they can. But if they have not put stock options, retention bonuses, a corner office, a golden parachute, good vacation days per year, or a highly competitive salary on the table already, then it is your fiduciary responsibility to your tiny entrepreneurship (i.e. your household) to seriously consider all other options. Bear in mind that it is likely that if they chose to you would get 2 weeks pay and a boot print on your hindquarters, and your loyalty should be scaled appropriately.

    At the same time, weigh any potential hit to your reputation within your field. If you are in a small industry be sure not to burn too many bridges that will hurt you in the future.

  141. Take the new job. by strangeattraction · · Score: 1

    If I had it to do all over again I would have consistently switched jobs every 3-5 years. For the following reasons: It builds your network of coworkers providing you even more opportunities in the future. Keeps stagnation from setting into your career. Keeps you from doing what you are doing now; over valuing yourself. If you are indeed that valuable to the company they will compensate you but it is always dicey promoting within.

  142. This aint your grand daddy's job market by theswade · · Score: 1

    The days of staying with one company and being amply rewarded with things like pensions and raises is long over. Loyalty rarely gets you anything. I've been a software developer for over 20 years. I've worked for roughly four companies in that time. The pay increases I got from switching jobs is about triple that I received for my 'loyalty' (staying with the same company). I recommend giving your two week notice because that's the ethical thing to do.

  143. It really depends on you do it by snsh · · Score: 1

    Whether you leave your employer, or your employer lets you go, the taste it leaves in your mouths comes from how it's executed.

    If your employer lays you off by talking to you personally and taking you out for drinks, then that will leave a much better feeling than if they lock you out of the building, mail you a cardboard box filled with your personal belongings, and threaten to sue you if you work for anyone they feel is a competitor.

    Likewise, if you document really well, make yourself available for questions, take everyone out for drinks, and get your coworkers to feel happy for you about the promotion, then that makes a huge difference compared to if you just hand in two weeks notice and split as if you don't care.

  144. Re:your loyalty is misplaced by PhilHibbs · · Score: 1

    He said "company", not "corporation". There's a big difference, at least in the vernacular usage.

  145. It's a business decision. Don't be loyal. by plopez · · Score: 1

    1) 7k UK seems a bit low to jump ship. Bargain with the offering company.

    2) DO NOT LET ON TO YOUR CURRENT COMPANY YOU HAVE AN OFFER. You will hose yourself. Instead say something like, "I worked hard on this project and I am training up two others. How about a raise"? Ask for at least 7k. If you see a nice project starting in the near future you would like to work on offer to take the lead position on the project. Move the junior developer more of a maintenance programmer type role, at least until they get more experience. That will sweeten the deal on your current employers end. If they don't pay, and all other things being equal, walk.

    3) Remember it is a business decision and I have *never* seen loyalty rewarded. Crunch the numbers. Also look at opportunities for professional growth. Every job should be a stepping stone to a better job. Run your career like a business.

    HTH

    --
    putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
  146. You are a business by Tony+Isaac · · Score: 1

    Your business has one employee, you. You are in business to offer programming (or other technical) services, in exchange for compensation.

    In each potential change of employment, you face a decision about costs and benefits. Loyalty is a good thing, and is one of the factors. But it's not everything. Compensation, quality of life, travel requirements, friendships with co-workers, commute time...all of these are factors that go into a decision whether to stay or go.

    When you think of yourself as a business, it allows you to look at your employment decisions more objectively, leading to better outcomes for you and for your employer. I've found that it is possible to go to your employer to ask for a raise, based on logical business-related principles, and do it without offending anyone or threatening to leave. If you are indeed as valuable as you think you are, the company will likely make a better offer, and no one has to be resentful about that.

  147. Quid pro quo by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Have they been loyal to you?

    Have they shown that you're valuable to them, and I don't mean "did they pay your salary on time", did they give you the feeling that you are viewed as an asset, were they considerate when you were in an emergency and needed their aid, be it time off or some cash in advance?

    In a nutshell: Do they deserve your loyalty?

    That's essentially the question. Do you consider the job one where you are comfortable? Is that where you want to be? I have rejected "better" jobs because my current employer does actually value me as an asset, they were very accommodating when I got sick and I do consider that an asset that can't be paid for with money. I am loyal, because they showed me very clearly that they deserve my loyalty. And I tend to take this quite serious.

    I would consider whether the company is a good place to work at, more than job opportunity or money. If you're treated like a hire and fire drone, money doesn't matter.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  148. Ask your gut by Ian-K · · Score: 1

    It's not just about the extra 7K plus the shorter distance.

    - What about the career prospects in either company? If you're not talking about "career" yet, will the other company offer you anything that will make your CV look better? (certifications / experience / brand name)

    - What about the people in the new company? You know the people in your current job, but what about the new job? I wouldn't want to lose my mates so as to enter a highly paid viper pit with everyone back-stabbing everybody else.

    - What about the companies themselves? Any solid roadmap? You wouldn't want to join the one company that is doing very well right now but the CEO is short-sighted or has a(n apparently) totally wrong grasp of where the market is going. I'd stick with the company where the management was more insightful and knew what they were doing.

    I saw this dilemma from the manager's side just two weeks ago.

    I'm an IT consultant for a rail operator and I'm leading a small group of developers within the company, where we're essentially building its IT infrastructures from scratch (and that's LOTS of software, among other things). There's tons of work but the hours are flexible, the atmosphere is relaxed, friendly and informal, the salary is good and overall we're more friends than co-workers. Although this is Greece, the business outlook isn't *that* :) bad for anyone who stays as the consolidation plan we've been implementing is beginning to pay off and the boss knows what he's doing.

    Just two weeks ago one of our developers jumped ship to join a big international company mainly known for its database product (and for upsetting the OSS community at large the last year or so :). Sure, it looks like a safe bet from miles away given the circumstances, but there are *always* pitfalls, so we wanted to make sure he had all the questions straight before he moved on. Hence, we had a very similar conversation to this, on a friendly, person-to-person level.

    --
    I'm no longer fed up with MS Windows: I go rid of them :)
  149. Think about your career by jgbustos · · Score: 1

    The short-term time and cash benefits of moving are clear: an extra hour for you each day, and more than £300 better off each month after the Exchequer's take.

    Now think:
    -What are you learning in your current workplace? What would you learn at the new one? Not only from the point of view of technology, but also from a wider business perspective.
    -How do the two businesses differ? Think present business model, future prospects, etc. Don't just consider how the companies pay salaries today, but how they will continue doing it tomorrow.

    And now for the final one:
    -How would the new workplace challenge, strain and push you further compared to the current one?
    -How would you improve as a professional in the new job?

  150. Are they loyal to you? by edmicman · · Score: 1

    I've left a couple companies, one of them twice, where I enjoyed working with the people was immediately around but due to acquisitions or change in corporate management I felt the overall company wasn't a good fit anymore. In all of these cases, and even now when I'm looking at what is out there, I ask myself a simple question: are they loyal to me? Unless it's a small company that is still small I have no doubts that they would get rid of me at any point it made business sense. So why should I not look out for #1, too? Plus, there's the bus situation. As much as we'd like to think we're indispensable, if something were to happen to someone things will be a mess for awhile but everyone left will find a way to make it work. If it's a better deal for me then business will go on.

  151. They might understand by jeremymiles · · Score: 1

    Twice I've had job offers which were clearly better than my current job. I wanted to remain on good terms, so I explained the situation. Both times they didn't counter, they knew it was a better job, and they understood why it would be foolish not to take it.

    --
    GENERATION 26: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation.
  152. The money doesn't care about you by 71thumper · · Score: 1

    You want to be only as loyal as makes sense to you. For every story of how workers being loyal has been good I can relate stories of how businesses made decisions that amounted to "sorry, things are bad, had to cut you, and can't afford a dime of severance, wish we could, but bummer" at 4:48pm on a Tuesday.

    Depending upon how close you are to finishing a project, you could ask for a touch more time from your new job and then tell your current employer "I can stay 6 weeks if you'd like to finish all this up, if you are willing to pay me at my new pay rate" Don't give them an extra money and give up 800 pounds!

    But in the end, companies that wish to staff so thin that they get single points of failure are no different that hosting companies that don't do backups to save money and then expect expect everyone to work crazy hours when their primary storage fails after several years -- they all want everything but don't want to pay for it.

  153. Be True to Yourself by Un+pobre+guey · · Score: 1

    Be true to yourself and do what you think is right. Everything else is bullshit. Go against your own personal code and you will regret it.

  154. Time for a change by RichMeatyTaste · · Score: 1

    Over the last 4 years I've managed a rather good run of moving up to bigger/better positions. In each case I have had to answer the "what would it take to keep you here" question and in each case I said that I wasn't interested in renegotiating. Upping my pay or asking for more of "X" changes the relationship in a way that cannot ever be undone, and odds are it doesn't solve the underlying problem anyway. More money for you doesn't solve the bad manager / small budget / long commute problem and any/all of those things will wear on you over time. Find someplace you like with a low idiot and/or psycopath to normal person ratio, remember to keep your skills current, and work to increase your value to the company just because it can't hurt.

    --


    Ever feel like you are driving the getaway car?
  155. It's Business! by TheEmpyrean · · Score: 1

    screw up a few times, then see how "loyal" your "friends and colleagues" are to you.

    'nuff said?

  156. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  157. Leaving is a good choice by BufferArea · · Score: 1

    They're been been in business for at least several years and they have higher management? Then they should be big enough to absorb the loss of any one developer at any time. Otherwise, they're not really run right. And in that case you should want to leave because that indicates poor planning abilities and you may be forced to get another job in the future anyway when they close down due to their poor planning.

  158. do whats right for you by Alex · · Score: 1

    Do whats right for you. The company will survive without you - and if it won't the owners of the company are foolish for not looking after you better, and they don't deserve your loyalty.

    As a couple of people on here have said, the 90m back each day could be worth much more than the 7k from a quality of life perspective.

    Plus I bet its only 90m on a good day, I bet you have days when its 90m each way !

    That 90m per day represents 7.5 hours of your time per week.

    Consider that you work 40 hours per week, and if you sleep 8 hours per night you sleep 56 hours per week and that the week is only 168 hours long.

    168 - 40 - 56 = 72

    So all this means if you get 7.5 hours back you have a little bit more than 10% more "you" time, which is massive.

    Alex

  159. Are you happy with this your present work? by Robbie_Gopi · · Score: 1

    As an engineer we take pride in our work. we want the company we work for to do well, even if you no longer to work for them. The company policies and how the company treats it's ex employee are dictated by its HR People. My experience tells me they are trained to be heartless and view every decision they take in terms of money. they think with their head. Move on ! it's your life and family that are more important. I am sure you will find new challenges in your new position.

  160. Have your cake and eat it - switch jobs + consult by Tepic++ · · Score: 1

    I was in this exact situation, although the pay/opportunities difference was rather more stark. I'm friends with the owner and I was the lead developer and the only person that could take on the broader and larger software/systems issues.

    Philosophy: as much as you care for the company they're not your friends or family in the business context and no business is worth sacrificing yourself for. You must realise that if it's a matter of business necessity, as much as the people in the company may care for you, they would also do the equivalent - make you redundant - if necessary.

    Leaving the company doesn't mean you have to leave them in the lurch. I'm consulting for the company I used to work for (I negotiated this ability into my new contract). I can still take care of the big issues that no one else can at my old company and this actually means the old company has become a more efficient business as they only pay me to handle the issues that I truly need to handle. Sometimes I wish I had more free time in the evenings, but because I care for the people there I'll continue to consult until the company is in a good technical position that I'm comfortable with.

    Now I've left my old company I've seen the other developer grow as a developer and, unexpectedly, I believe I've become a more effective lead there as I'm more inclined to discuss and outline a solution rather than implement it myself.

    In your situation I would move, as long as I was going to work for people I respect and I believed I would grow as a person in the new environment. The extra 1 1/2 hours of the day you'll save in commuting is a very significant chunk of time too - equivalent to a 20% salary raise in itself.

  161. Simply take the better job by Timmy+D+Programmer · · Score: 1

    Your dedication and loyalty becomes worthless the minute new management comes along, or the company is sold. If you really feel loyalty to your co-workers keep them in mind if jobs that suit them open up at your new employer. Also, don't bother with offering your current employer the opportunity to match, it almost always results in surprisingly tiny increases afterwards, where a new employer is likely to consider your salary a starting point, your current employer probably sees you at the top of your pay scale. Either way, good luck and congrats :-)

    --


    (If at first you don't succeed, do it different next time!)
  162. Give them good notice and maybe your email address by jonadab · · Score: 1

    Loyalty doesn't mean that you can't ever take another job. It does, however, mean that you should be nice about it. Give your existing company as much notice as you possibly can (in a situation like this, I'd recommend at least a month if at all possible). Be respectful, and don't burn any bridges you can leave standing. If the new company has even an ounce of brain, they'll respect this, or at least accept it.

    If you want to do a little more than that for them, you could offer to do a _few_ hours of consulting afterward (paid, of course), working around your new work schedule -- not coming back to work for them part time long-term or anything, just helping their new guys out a little here or there at first when they have questions that only you can answer on account of the fact that they weren't up to speed yet when you left. So if two days after you leave they realize "Oh, man, we totally forgot to ask him anything about how the frobnicator is set up" they don't have to panic and slit their wrists.

    If *that* doesn't sound like enough, maybe you're so into your current job that you might consider staying. But that's up to you. You're under no obligation to stay. (I'm assuming here that your employment is at-will, as is usual in the US, not contracted for some predetermined amount of time.)

    --
    Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
  163. crowd sourcing dear abby on /. by retroworks · · Score: 1

    I thought this was going to suck. But a lot of good advice going both directions above (at least the 5 and 4 mods). I'm a company owner, and hope staff like you would come and talk about it. If someone has been a good and loyal staff, what is best for YOU counts a lot with me. I generally know when someone is bluffing... Not recommended

    --
    Gently reply
  164. I've successfully navigated this one twice now by Medievalist · · Score: 1

    I have been approached by another company that is much bigger, and they have offered me a pay rise of [funny Anglic money] to do the same job, plus their office is practically outside my front door (as opposed to my current 45 minute commute each way). This would make a massive difference to my life. That said, I can't help but feel that to leave now would be betraying my friends and colleagues. Some friends have told me that I'm just being 'soft' - however I think I'm being loyal. Any advice?"

    Absolutely. First, listen to your gut. If you think it would be a betrayal, that's because it would be, in some sense.

    So: tell the new company you are going to need an extra two weeks to finish up at the old one, and that you'd extend the same courtesy to them if they were in the same predicament. Because you're honest and loyal.

    If the new company is really worth working for, they will say "damn straight skippy, we'd sure like to have you sooner but this just proves we were right to choose you!". If the new company is really a bunch of backstabbing rapacious bastards who have every intention of using you up and throwing you away at their earliest convenience, they will say "Oh, no, it's our way or the highway, you insignificant peon". In which case you don't really want to work for them, it just seems that way right now.

    So, assuming the new company is worth working for, and they give you the extra two weeks, you then go back to the old company and tell them "look, unless you are moving the whole business to be next door to my house, you can't match these guys' offer. But I negotiated an extra two weeks out of them so that I can help you get the new guys up to speed - so let's get doing that, now".

    People (reasonable people, anyway) understand that you need to do what's right for you, and will appreciate the extra effort you've put into trying to accommodate others' needs too.

  165. Cutbacks and cars by EmperorOfCanada · · Score: 1

    First, what kind of car does your boss drive? Is there some useless employee that earns more than you but could be tossed overboard in a second? These things will tell you if there is some money around for you.
    Second. Once those two juniors are trained up for less salary how useful will you be. Would you be first to be tossed in a cutback? If they gave a crap about you then other companies couldn't match or beat your salary so easily.
    Lastly don't negotiate from 7K down. If they offer you 3K to stay tell them yes if that is 3K over the 7K. Even then the new company wants you to start at 7K more whereas your company might resent your 7K demand. The only reason their feelings would be hurt by your "disloyalty" is if they have done something special for you. Exchanging work for money is not special.

  166. Talk by Sivaraj · · Score: 1

    If you have good relationship with your managers you may not feel like bargaining. £7k doesn't sound much assuming this is on annual salary. But those 1.5 hrs of commute you are saving can be much more beneficial. You are recovering about 8% of your waking life which could be spent in better way.

    In the long run you know this new job is more beneficial for you. So start talking to your managers, not for bargaining but to explain your scenario. Tell them you do need to quit, but give them time to plan your departure so that there is no feeling of betrayal. If given some time, they can recruit someone capable enough to take it over from you. If the other company really wants you they will relax their joining date.

    But before you talk, you should make up your mind on what you want. All the best.

  167. It depends on the company by Pirow · · Score: 1

    I think this really depends on the company, the place I used to work for was a small family run company, there was a few insanely loyal employees who had been there for longer than I've been out of high school (and in one case longer than I've been alive), unfortunately for them when redundancies were announced my job was safer than theirs and somebody who had been with the company for about 30 years, would work on his holidays if requested, never had a sick day and knew the directors since they were kids, he was one of the first people to be made redundant, another who had been working for the company had been there for about 15 years was also up for redundancy.
    It was a small family company, we all got on well, it was a close knit group and we'd all quite happily go to the pub together, but at the end of the day it's a business, they'll put the company first if it comes to it so you need to make sure you put yourself first.

  168. You're evil. by pubwvj · · Score: 1

    You're evil to do this to them. It is clear you are setting up the situation. Nasty.

  169. you are already betrayed; just go by dltaylor · · Score: 1

    By "outsourcing" some of the work, the company has already shown their colors. Just go.

    Don't bargain for more, 'cause that will simply put you at the top of the "to be replaced" list. Do offer some strictly described and limited in time and intensity "tech support", either for a fee or for free, unless they are a competitor for your new "temp job" ('cause that's all they are, these days).

  170. Loyalty where loyalty is due by bandit_of_time_I_am · · Score: 1

    “Loyalty where loyalty is due” - and - “communication is key” will prove useful to you. At the very least you should explain the situation to your current employer. If your employer gives you a reason to be loyal, then be loyal. Money is only part of the equation, be flexible and negotiate.

  171. be evil by Khashishi · · Score: 1

    If you are ever undecided about an action to take from a purely financial perspective, just ask yourself, which one action is more evil?

  172. take the job idiot by coaxial · · Score: 1

    Take the new job.

    Management would beat with a pool cue until you had dettached retinas for less money than that. Do you really think that management wouldn't sell out their employees for a buck? They already outsourced a big chunk of the code you said. One way loyalty is simply holding the hand that holds you down.

  173. Re:You're a virgin! by bezpredel6 · · Score: 1

    Actually, there is absolutely something "they can do to eliminate your commute" - they can pay him (her?) more money to make up for the (likely) difference in rent or inconvenience of relocation expenses. This argument in general is highly unreasonable and perpetuates the "fuck everyone" attitude. Meanwhile, even in very big cities individual industries in IT have a relatively small pool of people, and a good % of jobs are found via former coworkers. So while the company might not think twice before fucking you, you should think twice before fucking your colleagues - in a few months, when you interview in some other company, your resume might be on their desks.

  174. nt by shentino · · Score: 1

    Be generous and give them your standard 2 weeks notice after making DAMN SURE the job offer is solid.

    Make sure the offer with the next company is firm, in writing, and they can spare you long enough to let you give your old boss the required notice.

    If the new company refuses to play ball with you, take it as a sign that they're probably not going to treat you well if they can't even be bothered to get their paperwork in order or let you be courteous to your former boss.

    If the old company can't handle losing you in 2 weeks, take it as a sign that their own house is probably not in order well enough, and it's easily suggestible that you're on a sinking ship anyway.

    Be nice and be professional to both sides and cover your ass.

  175. Does it Pay? by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1

    The question was, does it pay? Obviously not as well as the new position will.

    Now why did you have to read through 542 other posts to get to the simple answer?

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  176. I'm a boss... by Taty'sEyes · · Score: 1

    So I'm a boss of a small manufacturing line (product I invented when I was an engineer). I have 35 direct reports. I have several that I feel are key, but I can tell you this, I can replace anyone of them and survive even though I tell them I can't live without them. If one of my employees comes and asks me honestly what they should do in your situation, I say, leave. I'll even give them a great reference if they ask and deserve such. If life will be better for you in the other company, go to the greener pasture. If you stay and bring your "what if" regrets to work with you every day, you'll bring the rest of my staff down with you. So go, be free and happy!

    --
    We show geeks how to get their dream girl at EyesOfOdessa.com
  177. Even "Good" Companies Can Be Two-Faced by awrc · · Score: 1

    First company I worked for was a great place to work - small but growing, varied work, nice salary increases (yes, this was almost 20 years ago). I left rather regretfully - personal circumstances meant I'd had to move out of the area, but they even helped me out by taking me on as a contractor for the first six months in my new location, while I got on my feet there.

    Later, after my next employer had been and gone and I'd been out of work for some time, they came back and asked if I wanted to telecommute. Didn't work particularly well, but they stuck by me even when I went through a burnout and had to go on short-term disability until my brain was less fried.

    However, all it took was one incident with miscommunication between two managers, which resulted in one of them losing face, and I went from being prized to getting a lousy review (which I protested as strongly as I could) and put on a probationary period - where I was put to work doing something completely different from what I was really hired for, and generally treated like scum before finally being laid off (and I later heard they were very pleased because they'd found out that the money saved could pay for two outsourced developers).

    So - small firms can be good, but the very smallness that makes them sometimes great places to work can turn on your very quickly, and it's much easier to get canned because of a personality clash or an idiot who wants somebody else to take the fall for their mistake. Your company has already demonstrated that they aren't above outsourcing. You might feel bad about doing it at a time when your company sees you as their golden boy, but if the sheen wears off once those two junior developers get up to speed, that perceived loyalty on their part may evaporate. Go with the better offer - while people within companies may be nice or decent, companies themselves basically don't give a damn, and even a CEO who is your best buddy one day can turn on a dime and can you the next. Having a good offer from elsewhere is getting to be a rare thing - don't miss the opportunity. It's good that you're not jaded enough to automatically think that way - I've gotten to the point where I'll work for nobody but myself, I've got complete distrust of employers.

  178. Companies are not families by TheSync · · Score: 1

    I hate the expression "we're all one big family [at this company]". It is a lie. The company is just another marketplace.

    One of my best bosses told me "keep your resume on the street. You should know how much you are worth. If someone offers you a lot more money, please give me a chance to match it."

    We exist in a market environment. Companies will lay you off at any point without thinking about your situation. Creative destruction is going on all around us.

    Two weeks notice is a reasonable thing, but even that is not a hard and fast rule depending on the situation. No one owns you, you own you.

  179. Does being 'Loyal' pay as a developer? by withoutfeathers · · Score: 1

    Short answer: No. To expand on that: No, being loyal does not pay as a developer.

  180. Re:Take the job by shentino · · Score: 1

    It's not so much that as the fact that bosses have more leverage than peons.

    They get your loyalty without reciprocating simply because they have all the cards and can burn you if they want to, whereas you cannot return that favor.

  181. Loyalty still counts in some places by guspasho · · Score: 1

    In a word: stay! Stay, stay, stay! Go with your gut and stay where you are.

    Loyalty is important to you, and it's important to the people you currently work with - with, not for. It's very questionable and unlikely that it will be valued at the company you are considering. Consider what you are leaving behind that you may not get back. A place where you are good friends with the upper management, and a shared sense of loyalty. These are intangibles that don't contribute to a paycheck but they do contribute to your job satisfaction. Your work is your life, and you must ask yourself if you are willing to work a job that you may hate but pays well, and how much time and income are you willing to give up to do something you love?

    Also consider, if moving up the corporate ladder is important to you, this is a small company on the verge of their big launch. Odds are, even if they fail, that you will move up as the company grows, faster than if you join a smaller company. You know the dynamics of your company, not us, so you must be the judge of that.

    This should be a no-brainer. Stick with your current job.

  182. There is no loyalty by Kevin+Fishburne · · Score: 1

    I worked in IT at a mortgage company for three years and got laid off before one of my less senior co workers as the company began its slow implosion. I had been there longer than him and my boss.

    I had been at a different mortgage company for three years when my boss left with a better job. He took me aside and said he had a position there for me and could set up an interview with his new boss if I liked. I interviewed and was offered the job for $6000 more than I was making. I told my employers and offered them the opportunity to counter-offer, expressing my love of the job and desire to stay. They declined and I put in my notice.

    On my last day my employer came to me and said the execs had changed their minds because of everything I did around the place, that they'd bump me $6000. I was extremely pleased, and the raise was effective immediately. Three months later I was laid off with half the IT department. I tried to contact my old boss and got no response; that bridge had been burned by me staying on at my old job.

    Obviously I think you should take the job without another thought. Believe me, no one cares about you but you.

    --
    Buy your next Linux PC at eightvirtues.com
  183. Be loyal to yourself by shackletj · · Score: 1

    I'm loyal to me. I recently left a good job for a new higher paying less commute job. I love the extra money and the shorter commute. So go for it.

    I know myself, so I know bargaining just tends to make me angry...but if you do it, definitely have a plan. If you want a raise, just ask for it and don't try to bludgeon management with another offer. I'll say hey boss I'm ready for a $10k raise (but more flowery). Then if you don't like what they offer, you can always reply with: I'm disappointed with your offer of $5k, it doesn't seem in line with my value to the company or in the marketplace, I'd really like $10k. If they still don't budge, just leave.

  184. This is a no-brainer. by mark_reh · · Score: 1

    Take the new job. Your relationship with the company is a business relationship. They'll only keep you around as long as they feel you're contributing sufficiently to the bottom line. You should evaluate the company the same way. If someone came along and offered to do your job for less pay you'd be on the street in a heartbeat. When someone offers you more money to work for them, take it.

    Companies have no loyalty to you, you should have none for them. The old company, and any other, including the new one, would not think twice about throwing your ass out on the street. Maximize your revenues at all times against the day when you have none.

  185. You are asking for permission to improve your life by Ted+Stoner · · Score: 1

    You are asking for permission to improve your life. Just do it. Everyone is replaceable. Leave good documentation for stuff that is hard to figure out. If you have been a good employee then you would have done that as a matter of course anyway. Give them sufficient notice and help them as much as possible during your transition out period.

  186. No. by Roachie · · Score: 1

    No.

    --
    This sig is not paradoxical or ironic.
  187. Misplaced loyalty by jmcvetta · · Score: 1

    Loyalty will cost you much, and benefit you little. Don't be a dick, give them a few weeks notice, but take the job that's better for you.

  188. Is 7k important? by loufoque · · Score: 1

    As a senior developer, shouldn't your salary be high enough that an additional 7k a year isn't all that much, just an extra month's worth?

  189. You are asking the wrong people by mmcuh · · Score: 1

    You should ask your current employer for a raise to match your new offer. If they don't match it, then no, it obviously doesn't pay to be loyal.

  190. You need to put yourself and your family first by jjn1056 · · Score: 1

    Don't think you are as needed as you suppose. As the saying goes, "The graveyard is filled with people once thought of as irreplaceable."

    I understand the feeling, you want the job to be more than just a relationship of convenience and profit. It seldom works out like that. It might feel that way for a while, but hit an economic downturn, or face a suddenly buyout or change in upper management and you'll soon see the reality. You need to do what is in your personal best interest, taking everything into account (not just the money). If it was in the best interest of the company to lay you off, they'd do it in an instant, and likely with a lot fewer qualms as you feel now.

    good luck!

    --
    Peace, or Not?
  191. Do Both by Hankenstein · · Score: 1

    Take the offer, but then offer to your (now) former employee that you can help/consult/be available in the evenings or weekends for particularly difficult problems. Offer to do it for free and if they do value you, they might be willing to pay you for it. Your junior developers will be grateful but not as grateful as the owners.

        This has worked for me twice in the past. You don't burn bridges, and in fact strengthen relationships. You will probably find, as I did, that your period of working two jobs will last less than a month.

  192. don't burn any bridges by pbjones · · Score: 1

    in the end you must understand that in 99% of cases, they would end up booting you out if it was required. Loyalty only goes as far, then it's down to business.

    --
    There was an unknown error in the submission.
  193. Or... by Evets · · Score: 1

    I haven't done it myself since I've been self-employed for ... well what seems like forever, but I have seen several people leave their jobs only to come back as contractors days later with a 300% bump in their pay. A company of any size will have limits on what they pay people internally. Those rules generally don't apply to contractors with very specialized knowledge.

    It's not the fact that you have a hammer that gets you paid, it's the fact that you know what, where, when, why, and how to whack whatever it is that needs fixing.

  194. Priorities by nobodyknowsimageek · · Score: 1

    This is really a question of your priorities, and a little bit about whether you think your current company is likely to be successful; I say that because a small company generally has much better growth potential, but also a much higher chance of failing.

    Personally I think the pay rise you mention is pretty small change. The convenience of the commute is nice. But it seems to me much more important to ask yourself if the new/bigger company offers you a better career opportunity than your existing one. Another important consideration is the personal relationships you have at your current position. In my 25+ years in software, those relationships have been far and away more important than any other consideration.

  195. From a UK perspective by illtud · · Score: 1

    Is the new offer solid? Is it subject to references? Is the new company solid, or a startup that could disappear? You'll need a good reference from your present employer if the new company tanks, but if it's a long term contract or a permanent post with the new company then that may not be such an issue. Is the new post one that you'd enjoy? There's lots of people saying "screw them, they'd screw you" but from what I know of small dev companies in the UK, I think they're showing a US bias.

    You've given us an figure for the income raise you're getting, rather than a %age, so I can't really tell what level you're at, which would be useful (though I understand why you may not share this). Will this take you into the higher-rate tax band (making that £7k smaller, losing family allowance from 2013, other considerations)? Flat salary isn't everything, you need to consider pension and other benefits (I'm sure you have, but you haven't shared that, so we can't figure that in).

    Share your quandary with your company. The 45 min commute is costing you, both in hours and quality of life. Give them a chance to step up and match the offer + compensation for that commute. If your leaving will cost them as much as you say, they'll be happy to do that, and you'll have shown your loyalty by giving them this chance, but be sure to spell out exactly what you're expecting from them. Your CV will be enhanced if you stick with them to getting a 'flagship' product out the door, and if they're really your friends and have proper business acumen they'll be happy to have this chance to keep you. Just be sure that you're strong enough to resist any "jam tomorrow" promises and stress that this isn't a bluff or blackmail attempt (not in those words, though). Unless you live in the middle of a tech zone, they're going to know who's offering you the job, so be certain that whoever you approach isn't somebody who's going to wreck your new offer. If you have any doubts about this strategy, that's probably a sign that you don't really trust your present company and you should just jump ship.

    Good luck, whatever you do. Note that if any of your present company management are ./ers then they'll probably finger you for this post if you approach them, not that that should matter, you've been very honest about your dilemma, just don't be surprised.

  196. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  197. don't be a chump by PJ6 · · Score: 1

    Treat it like any normal relationship. Don't stay because of guilt, stay because you're happy.

  198. Re:You're a virgin! by The+Man · · Score: 1

    Actually, there is absolutely something "they can do to eliminate your commute" - they can pay him (her?) more money to make up for the (likely) difference in rent or inconvenience of relocation expenses.

    This argument in general is highly unreasonable and perpetuates the "fuck everyone" attitude. Meanwhile, even in very big cities individual industries in IT have a relatively small pool of people, and a good % of jobs are found via former coworkers. So while the company might not think twice before fucking you, you should think twice before fucking your colleagues - in a few months, when you interview in some other company, your resume might be on their desks.

    Unless you worked for Sun in 2010, I don't really care about your uninformed opinion. As for fucking your colleagues, give me a break; they'd kill their own mothers to get the knife to stab you in the back if it meant they get to keep their miserable jobs through the next redundancy. It's not unreasonable at all; it's the way things work. You can look out for number one or you can take it up the ass; I don't really give a damn either way but I do think these young kids should hear the advice once so they can regret not heeding it later.

  199. Satisfaction by neither_geek_nor_ner · · Score: 1

    The bare fact that you are asking /. for advice shows that you want to complete the project roll-out and fulfill your responsibility. If the new company really wanted you then they would wait.

  200. Are you kidding me? by Rudisaurus · · Score: 1

    Be under no illusions: when times turn bad for your present company, they'll toss you over the side like a used kleenex. Your first priority -- your prime directive -- is to look out for yourself.

    It's the job of the company's management to manage risks, and one of the risks they face is losing their main development resources (whether voluntarily or involuntarily -- you could get hit by a bus). They need to manage that risk by ensuring -- in terms of compensation -- that the risk of voluntary departure is minimized. Clearly they have failed to do so adequately. That's their problem. They'll have to deal with the fall-out from their own lack of understanding and foresight.

    You, however, have a primary responsibility to yourself and to your family. Loyalty be damned; that's just a mind game. There's business and then there's friendship -- and business trumps friendship every time -- please see first statement above and exit (to break recursion).

    --
    licet differant, aequabitur
  201. Loyalty matters (somewhat) by kmoser · · Score: 1

    Loyalty always matters, as it's an indication of how you value relationships over money and personal convenience. Ask the company making the offer whether they'd be willing to postpone hiring you for a month or so. If that's too long, see if you can start in two weeks but on a part-time basis for two weeks. Also, explain to your current employer what the situation is, and see if you can come to some sort of agreement on how much longer you can stay on without compromising your next career steps.

  202. loyalty is irrelevent in your case by deathbait · · Score: 1

    If you're asking if it "pays" to be loyal, you're no longer talking about loyalty. Loyalty is about sticking with someone no matter how great the value of changing sides is. It's about willing to stick around even if it doesn't "pay". You're not asking about loyalty. You're just wondering if staying on will benefit you more in the long run.

  203. Consider Everything by nick_davison · · Score: 1

    Salary is a nice part of your total compensation. You mentioned lack of commute, too.

    Regular hours, vacation time, trustworthiness of management (people are jumping to the assumption that you're a sucker for loyalty because they're used to managers having none of their own but you may have just as much of a "sucker" protecting you and that counts for A LOT), stability of the company, potential for growth, potential to avoid getting canned because of things outside your control, atmosphere within the team, pride in the work you do or could do, medical, pension, vacation time all such things are worth considering too. There's even value in the concept of "a change is as good as a rest." I've said it myself, "This may well be a case of the grass is always greener. But, if it takes me a year to realize that, I still spend a year enjoying what feels like greener grass."

    That 45 minute commute you avoid doesn't mean anything if your current company is good about sticking to a 9-6 while the new company buys cheap pizza at 8pm each night to keep people working until midnight. The extra 7k might be nice but are you trading it for being the last one in, first one out, the moment something's rocky in the new company?

    Or the reverse might be true... That 7k and the 45 minutes of commute may be the least of what you're gaining as you move to a healthier environment, get more vacation time, better benefits, bonuses that actually materialize, etc.

    Either way, look at the whole picture. Weigh up which is the right option for you.

    If moving is the right option, politely give your notice without burning any bridges. When asked why you're leaving, explain it that dispassionately. It's a business decision, just like they'd make. You're not trying to sabotage them, you're not upset with them, you've simply got an offer that's too good to pass up.

    The other advantage of really considering the whole picture is you know what the new job's really worth to you. It's not just that 7k. The commute's worth x to you as well. The other benefits are worth +/-y. It might be that another 3k and a title change are enough to make you stay, it might be that their matching or even doubling that 7k isn't worth it once you factor everything else in. Knowing where you stand, having factored everything in, beforehand, lets you keep everything purely business and non personal.

  204. Contrast to Wall Street bankers by nikkipolya · · Score: 1

    That's the difference between Wall street bankers and the rest of the folks. And that's probably why Wall street bankers take huge paychecks, while the rest of the folks just pass money for "What will my so called friends and colleagues think about me?".

  205. quid pro quo by Tom · · Score: 1

    It all depends on your company. Have they been loyal to you in the past? What is their behaviour towards other employees? Can you derive from that if they're likely to be loyal to you in the future?

    Most companies don't know loyalty. On the first restructuring project, they'll set you free if they don't need you anymore. So why shouldn't you be doing the same?

    Some companies, OTOH, will try to keep their employees, even if it means a hit to their baseline. Usually, these are smaller companies run by an owner who is interested in long-term relationships more than quarterly figures.

    In general: If you have a better offer, the best thing to do is the honest way: Tell your boss that you have a better offer and are thinking about leaving, and give him the chance to match it (and that doesn't only mean salary!). That way, when they don't and you leave, they can't go whining about it. After all, free market and all, they always love it when it's the source of their profits.

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  206. This is the best I've seen it described by dko1625 · · Score: 1

    To quote :

    The biggest mistake that you can make is to believe that you are working for somebody else.
    Job security is gone.
    The driving force of a career must come from the individual.
    Remember: Jobs are owned by the company, you own your career !
    - Earl Nightingale

    The rest, loyalty to employer, family, pay, job satisfaction and so on is very individual so YMMV
    So YOU need to decide how to balance things to may it work to your own satisfaction.
    /Life does not come with a manual

  207. Ask to a given shares or partnership by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

    Small startups need to share with their devoted employees. If they do not, the two juniors will replace you and you will be redundant.

    Now is the time to analyse their intentions. Do so by asking. Diplomatically them what you have.

    --
    Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
  208. Public transport is free by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    Well not free but the employers pays it 100% in for instance Holland.

    Almost everyone gets travel expenses but car users get a fixed amount per mile that is not enough to cover it, public transport users just hand in their tickets for a full refund.

    Remember that the entire world is NOT the US and that pre-tax amount of a salary says very little about how much you actually are getting.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  209. Been there... by ResidentSourcerer · · Score: 1

    Worked as the main system admin for a dot com company. I got an offer that didn't pay as much, but offered far more flexibility, 12 weeks annual vacation, and an hour shorter commute each way.

    I knew that my leaving would disrupt things, so instead of the usual 2 weeks notice, I gave them 6 weeks notice. I suggested that they hire someone, and that I would act as mentor, getting him up to speed. Management decided that Unix sysadmins were a fungible commodity, and it could wait until after the hiring freeze. Two days before my 6 weeks was up, I was fired. (!) It had come to the attention of the president of the company that I was openly critical of their procurement policies. (3 signatures on 3 different forms, and two faxes to head office required to purchase a $100 network card.)

    They were so afraid that I had left trapdoors that my workstation was wiped clean, and my directory wiped from the rsync servers. (We did backups every 3 hours using rsync.

    Two days later I get a phone call about the setup. I told them that it was all in a 40 page document in my home directory/SysAdmin. They asked how to restore from backup tape. I told them that it was in the Admin documentation file, and that many versions of it were on the rsync server. (Once every 3 hours for the previous 24, one per day for the previous 2 weeks, one per week for the previous 2 months, one per month for the previous 6 months. Not as bad as it sounds. If a file hadn't changed, it was a hard link)

    Was I interested in coming in and sorting out the mess? No, I had a new job at 3/4 of the pay, and 3 times the freedom.

    Half a year later I met my replacement. He'd lasted for 3 months before he'd been laid off. He said he was on the verge of quitting when he'd been laid off. The management style hadn't changed.

    Six months later, the company was a research subsidiary of EMC, and had 12 employees.

    --
    Third Career: Tree Farmer Second Career: Computer Geek First Career: Teacher, Outdoor Instructor, Photographer.
  210. Employment Contract by obscuro · · Score: 1

    You want to be loyal but you don't want to be hurt long term for it. Tell your employers your situation and give them the option of a long term employment contract. 3-5 years that includes raises, vacations, benefits, bonuses the whole bit. Be open and honest about it. From what you've said there's a very short time frame, that works in your favor. You can even tell the people you're going to work for that you have to give your current employer a chance to make it worth your while to stay because its a critical time for them.

    If they say they can't get the contract done in time tell them that's not an option. Be nice, really helpful, but firm.

    Have a lawyer available to quickly review the contract and make changes. Work with him to define your limits up front. Let your employer know that you understand this costs money and that you're also paying someone to expedite your response.

    Chances are you'll end up working for the other company but you'll have been a stand up guy about it. You current employers will know that they had a chance to keep you and feel there (very real) participation in your choice. They could have given you a contract like that much earlier on their own initiative...

    In business, loyalty without solid commitments on paper is a time bomb.

    --
    Every rule has more than one consequence.
  211. You're not thinking about this the right way by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1

    I used to have these hangups. I got over it long ago. The truth is, even in your company they may promote you to another part of the company tomorrow. Your friends will be in the same situation. The company will do what is in their best interest, which may be to keep you right where you are for the next 10 years or more. Further your career.
    Along with that, you have to do your homework. Is this really a good opportunity? Can you expect your position to be there in a year? I.e. will the company be there in a year. Just do your best guess. People at the American company Solyndra had no clue until they got their termination notice. Even the President was there recently, pumped in 1/2 billion USD. Bankupt in less than a month. That may happen where you are. I left a company in the early 1990s and 6 months later everyone else was laid off. They moved the operation from Virginia (USA) to Finland. All but I think one guy was terminated after the product was developed here and supported for years.
    You do owe it to yourself to do the research and make a decision. Also, understand that the decision is yours. Don't blame anyone on slashdot, or a relative.
    Best of luck

  212. Wow... by Sumtingwong · · Score: 1

    There is a great book out there called the "Further Up the Organization" that speaks pretty well about this topic. Your employers should be happy, especially if they are friends, that you have another opportunity. If they really want you around, they will match the offer or wish you the best of luck in your new adventure.

    I seriously question the motives/attitude of those who have posted that the company has no loyalty to you or that you should not give a damn. The various comments that I have read here seem to be part of many companies overall downward spiral of customer service and quality goods: I want somebody who is going to be part of the organization when I talk to them on the phone, not just somebody who works there (aka, these employees are taking the employers money to give me half-assed answers to the questions I ask or service I am paying for without any desire for accountability). Anyone who does not understand this deserves the position they are in and *hopefully* has a colleague or friend rather than just another bitter bitch partner to guide them out of their selfish misconceptions. Jobs are not a right.

    As for the commute, yeah that is quite a bit of time to get back, but I do sometimes miss my commute as it gave me time to read or listen to music or study or whatever. The time saved with shorter commutes always seemed to be lost and unquantifiable.

    Best of luck to you.

    --
    Word!
  213. Family is where your loyalty should lie by rhyous · · Score: 1

    Look, right outside your front door is good for many reasons: 1. You can have more time with your family. - Spend lunch hours with them 2. You can work an extra 30 minutes each day to get ahead and still be home more than you were when commuting. 3. You pay less in gas, so the £7k raise may actually be a £9k raise when you factor in travel costs you won't be paying. Do what is right for you and your family...think long term too.

  214. Turn It Around by Dean+Edmonds · · Score: 1

    It can be useful to look at the situation the other way around.

    Let's say that the company you work for is worth $10 million. In other words, someone would have to offer the owners $10m to buy it from them. Let's further assume that the 7k increase that the new job offers you is 10% of your current salary.

    Here's the question: If a potential buyer offered to pay the owners of your company an additional $1 million (10% more) if they cut some staff, including you, would they take it or would they reject it out of loyalty to you?

    If they'd take the $1m and dump you then they have no loyalty to you so you owe no loyalty to them in return.

    --

    -deane