Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Unveils Xbox One

Today at a press conference leading up to E3, Microsoft unveiled its next-gen games/entertainment console, the Xbox One. Their stated goal for the Xbox One is to have a single device provide "all of your entertainment." One of the big changes is increased support for voice and and gesture input. You can turn the console on by voice, and it will recognize you and automatically login. Swiping to the side with your hand will browse through menu pages, and saying "Watch TV" will bring up the TV app very quickly. The same with music, internet, and movies. The new console also supports multitasking — for example, while watching a movie, you can bring up your web browser in a side panel and surf the web at the same time. There is also a built-in TV listings app that responds to channel names — saying "Watch CBS" will switch to CBS without giving it an actual channel number. By this point, you're probably asking: does it play games? Yes. Hardware specs: 8-core CPU/GPU, 8GB RAM, a Blu-ray drive, a 500GB HDD, USB 3.0, and Wi-fi Direct. (They didn't provide the CPU frequency, instead saying it had 5 billion transistors.) The Kinect sensor got an upgrade: 2Gbps of data capture has finer skeletal visibility, can detect minor orientation changes in hands and fingers, and can even calculate your balance and weight distribution. The new controller looks slightly bigger, and is designed to play well with Kinect. They've also updated Smartglass, the remote control software that runs on mobile devices, but they didn't explain much about it. The new Xbox Live will have 300,000 servers powering it, up from 15,000 this year — though, of course, no details were provided about server specs. The console will have native game capture and editing tools — essentially, a game DVR. Saved games will be stored in the cloud, and they have new matchmaking capabilities that operate in the background. Update: 05/21 17:50 GMT by S : Halo is getting its own live-action TV show, for some reason. They'll be collaborating with Steven Spielberg. Microsoft is also partnering with the NFL for live broadcasts and interactive experiences, such as split-screen Skype chats and fantasy league updates. Xbox One will be out "later this year." No price information. it will not be backward-compatible with Xbox 360 games.

491 of 782 comments (clear)

  1. I look forward to hearing about why this will fail by Toreo+asesino · · Score: 4, Funny

    Please Slashdot, do your worst :)

    --
    throw new NoSignatureException();
  2. Looks like a cross between by kipin · · Score: 4, Informative

    A 1980's stereo receiver and a VHS player from the 1990's.

    --
    If I can not smoke in heaven, then I shall not go. -- Mark Twain
    1. Re:Looks like a cross between by vuke69 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Those goofy vent things on the top will be a dusty wreck in about a month.

      --
      Time is an illusion. Lunchtime doubly so. ~ Douglas Adams
    2. Re:Looks like a cross between by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 2

      where da 8 track go??

    3. Re:Looks like a cross between by rwa2 · · Score: 1

      I think that's a plus... most people I know with serious entertainment systems always complained about how the oddly-shaped consoles never fit well in their systems.

  3. Where are the games? by BEI01 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It took them 30 minutes, half the duration of the entire presentation, before they started talking about games. It is not looking good as a next-gen "game" system.

    1. Re:Where are the games? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Need to wait for E3 for more details about that. I'm also disappointed in that, but there is still time.

    2. Re:Where are the games? by alen · · Score: 1, Insightful

      everyone knows its going to let you shoot and kill people and monsters with lots of blood and gore in HD

      the TV part is going to sell it to the wife and the ESPN features are the knife in sony's back

    3. Re:Where are the games? by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      the TV part is going to sell it to the wife and the ESPN features are the knife in sony's back

      That's the theory, but since I already have a PVR, and have no desire to involve Microsoft in my television watching experience ... it's certainly not a feature I care about.

      I'm firmly in the single-player, offline-only game-play camp, and pretty much all of the features they seem most excited about are things I already have covered with other technology.

      So either it's a decent console video game which can be played without requiring an internet connection, or it's something I don't want.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    4. Re:Where are the games? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Sony will get a cut from every console sold for BluRay licensing.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    5. Re:Where are the games? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      Yes, but Sony has the most patents on the technology. Sure, they must be licensed under FRAND rules, but Sony still gets paid.

      Just being part of the consortium doesn't get you a cut, just the ability to implement BluRay tech and pay the FRAND governed fees.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    6. Re:Where are the games? by Bigbutt · · Score: 2

      I know I prefer it. Nothing screws up good sex like a second (or more) person.

      I do like how you associated not being interested in competing with twitchy 13 year olds with nothing better to do all day with being anti-social. Like being "social" is interacting with someone over the internet. I think you really need to get outside more and be "social" with people and not a disembodied voice over a bluetooth headset.

      [John]

      --
      Shit better not happen!
    7. Re:Where are the games? by TWiTfan · · Score: 1

      Bluray may technically be a consortium, but Sony gets the biggest cut. They own most of the patents.

      --
      The cow says "Moo." The dog says "Woof." The Timothy says "Thanks, valued customer. We appreciate your input."
    8. Re:Where are the games? by jitterman · · Score: 1

      Or, he doesn't care for the company you often get in random matches. One's age and social group can make a huge difference upon your preferences. I don't think I'll chuck him / her over so quickly to the introvert crowd. Your AC post is the one I'd personally judge to be more antisocial.

      --
      For conscience is the wound, and there's naught to staunch it
    9. Re:Where are the games? by oreiasecaman · · Score: 1

      Nothing screws up good sex like a second (or more) person.

      This guy would be proud of you: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Onan

      --
      This is a UDP joke, I don't care if you get it or not...
    10. Re:Where are the games? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I know I'm replying to a troll, but here goes...

      Onan's sin was that he was not giving his deceased brother children. This is called Levirate Marriage and has nothing to do with masturbation. The purpose of a Levirate Marriage was to make sure that a man was buried properly and his brother's children continued his family line, and the purpose of THAT was to make sure he didn't fall into Lower Sheol and vanish, but instead remained in Upper Sheol.

      This is also the driving theme behind the book of Ruth; that book is a story of familial love between Ruth and Naomi, because Ruth married Naomi's dead husband's relative for this reason. It even said as much, that Boaz would, by marrying Ruth, redeem the land of his cousin, "that he be not cut off from among his bretheren."

      This was the Mesopotamian view of the afterlife. Judaism didn't start getting apocalyptic or even judgmental concerning the afterlife until the Babylonian Captivity/Exile, whereupon it absorbed large swathes of Zoroastrian religious thought, including the angelology and what is essentially an omnipotent but evil anti-God (Satan) from Angra Mainyu/Ahriman.

    11. Re:Where are the games? by suutar · · Score: 1

      if it can replace my cable box, maybe, but I'm already working on that and I think I can do it better (for my needs) than this does. It can't replace the 360 (not compatible), can't replace the ps3 (unless they stop making me buy xbox live to do netflix), can't replace the turntable, so now we have to find room for it somewhere that won't annoy my wife... yeah, not seeing it.

    12. Re:Where are the games? by xswl0931 · · Score: 1

      Games will be discussed at E3 which is in a couple of weeks

    13. Re:Where are the games? by Barlo_Mung_42 · · Score: 1

      They're just acknowledging the reality that most people do a lot more than just play games.

    14. Re:Where are the games? by Drishmung · · Score: 1

      everyone knows its going to let you shoot and kill people and monsters with lots of blood and gore in HD

      the TV part is going to sell it to the wife and the ESPN features are the knife in sony's back

      Is it going to be quiet, or sound like an unmuffled hovercraft like the original XBOX 360?

      If you have the volume turned up to 11 for FPS then the loudness of the console is not so much of an issue, but as an STB replacement, it needs to be silent.

      --
      Protoplasm. Quiet Protoplasm. I like quiet protoplasm.
    15. Re:Where are the games? by Nyder · · Score: 1

      I'm firmly in the single-player, offline-only game-play camp

      So what you're saying is that you're prefer masturbation, over getting involved with other people... Anti-socialism, we get it, this is /. afterall...

      -AC

      tbh, I prefer masturbating on people.

      --
      Be seeing you...
    16. Re:Where are the games? by hinchles · · Score: 1

      Its ok I watched most of the presentation thinking wtf do I care about NFL or ESPN the entire presentation was only really relevent to US based users what do the rest of the world get or is it going to be like the current generation where if you're outside of the US you loose a large chunk of functionality for no reason.

    17. Re:Where are the games? by oji-sama · · Score: 1

      E3. Or so 'they' (in the forums) say.

      --
      It is what it is.
    18. Re:Where are the games? by Bigbutt · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure why the guy would care. My comment reflects my[0] experience dealing with the opposite sex, especially when it comes to sex. It's a long complicated process of wooing and courtship just to get to the point where you have the opportunity for sex, then further complexity in the relationship with more courtship and ritual posturing to again have the opportunity for sex.

      Honestly, while I do enjoy sex. It's really a complicated and time intensive process that rarely turns out like I'd like. All things being equal, I'd rather be debugging a tcp session (which has been fun, let me say) or crafting a new function on one of my website projects (very satisfying).[1]

      [John]

      [0] Just to emphasize, this is my experience. Your experience may be totally different. You might have a mind meld with your partner and have glorious, orgasmic sex nightly with no emotional baggage or brain chemistry imbalances. Not everyone is like me, not everyone is like you.
      [1] Which might explain why I've been divorced twice ;)

      --
      Shit better not happen!
    19. Re:Where are the games? by oreiasecaman · · Score: 1

      Why complicate everything, when you can just go to a bar & exaggerate on the booze, pick someone, fsck all night then regret it later?! :)

      --
      This is a UDP joke, I don't care if you get it or not...
    20. Re:Where are the games? by Bigbutt · · Score: 1

      For the first, I don't drink. Second, I'm one of those guys who has a hard time functioning in crowds. Too much input and I tend to get headaches and migrate to the edges, then out the door and into the cool, dark night. Even when gaming at the local shop (think loads of kids playing Pokemon, Yu-gi-o, Magic, Warcraft, or Ki-ju-do (sp) depending on the day) and I can only handle a couple of hours and only when concentrating on the game in front of me.

      And heck, if you want to go that way I could just find a prostitute. It might even be cheaper :)

      [John]

      --
      Shit better not happen!
  4. Depends, but will probably get it by kannibal_klown · · Score: 1

    I'm liking casual gaming more and more, and enjoying the computer-upgrade-cycle less and less. So I've increased the amount of console gaming a bit over the last few years.

    Personally, I had more fun with my XBox than the PS3. Part of it is I mostly like the XBox 360 controller more.

    So unless it's an utter failure, I'll probably get it.

    *mostly = I like the shape, but I tend to slightly disconnect the battery pack when I'm using a wireless one from time to time.

    1. Re:Depends, but will probably get it by h4rr4r · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I will consider it when I can play netflix on it without any sort of subscription.

    2. Re:Depends, but will probably get it by h4rr4r · · Score: 4, Informative

      No, why?
      Netflix has no advertising. I play it on my PS3 with no subscription to any sony product and there are no ads.

    3. Re:Depends, but will probably get it by Holi · · Score: 1

      Find a console that isn't locked down that people actually want then come back with your whining.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    4. Re:Depends, but will probably get it by timmyf2371 · · Score: 1

      The XBL Gold requirement annoys me too. I used to use Sky Go (my satellite provider's version of IPTV) for when the other TVs were in use, but I soon realised that for not much more than the XBL cost I could get a proper HD box with all the channels.

      --

      Backup not found: (A)bort (R)etry (P)anic
    5. Re:Depends, but will probably get it by tepples · · Score: 1

      Find a console that isn't locked down that people actually want

      PC.

    6. Re:Depends, but will probably get it by h4rr4r · · Score: 2

      I already have a PS3 and if this sort of BS continues I might get a PS4.

      For the other stuff I use a HTPC since hulu blocks non PC devices from their free site.

    7. Re:Depends, but will probably get it by EvanED · · Score: 1

      Buy a PC and don't buy DRM-infested garbage.

      You'll still close off way way more than most people are willing to.

      For instance, my favorite video game, without a doubt, is Portal. But that's on Steam, which is DRM. Granted, it's not always-online or limited-install crap, but DRM it most definitely is.

      If you're OK getting something like Portal, than you've... well, your anti-DRM ideas have their price in some sense. (I'm not trying to criticize here -- mine definitely have their own price -- but just be realistic.) And at that point it's the old joke about how now it's just a matter of haggling over price, as you've established that your attitude is "DRM decreases the value of something" instead of "I won't buy DRM at all." And at that point, who's to say that the console price isn't below the limit?

      If you're not OK even with Steam, I legitimately applaud you sticking to your ideals. But at the same time -- most people, like me, are not in that camp. Sure, there are some good games that are available DRM free (most notably, some old games and some of the things in the Humble Bundles like Psychonauts and Braid), but you're still missing out on a ton.

    8. Re:Depends, but will probably get it by TWiTfan · · Score: 4, Informative

      So you want Adds in the middle of your shows?

      He means the Xbox Live Gold subscription, not the Netflix one. Unlike every other device on the market, Xbox requires you to pay them $50/year just to access the Netflix app (on top of what you pay Netflix)

      --
      The cow says "Moo." The dog says "Woof." The Timothy says "Thanks, valued customer. We appreciate your input."
    9. Re:Depends, but will probably get it by TWiTfan · · Score: 1

      PC.

      Yeah, no DRM there.

      --
      The cow says "Moo." The dog says "Woof." The Timothy says "Thanks, valued customer. We appreciate your input."
    10. Re:Depends, but will probably get it by Mike+Frett · · Score: 1

      Judging by pre-orders and their Kickstarter, Ouya. Totally open.

    11. Re:Depends, but will probably get it by sixoseven · · Score: 1

      That would be called a 'book'. You can buy them for fifty cents on the streets of New York. OTOH, we kinda like DRM-infested garbage for what it is. Not a book. So we don't judge them by the same standards. Perhaps if you read more books you could relieve yourself of the pressure you feel about the fun that is DRM-infested garbage on consoles.

      --
      fault-tolerant
    12. Re:Depends, but will probably get it by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      If you're OK getting something like Portal, than you've... well, your anti-DRM ideas have their price in some sense. (I'm not trying to criticize here -- mine definitely have their own price -- but just be realistic.) And at that point it's the old joke about how now it's just a matter of haggling over price, as you've established that your attitude is "DRM decreases the value of something" instead of "I won't buy DRM at all." And at that point, who's to say that the console price isn't below the limit?

      Or you bought a DRM'd thing during an irrational lapse of judgement.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    13. Re:Depends, but will probably get it by EvanED · · Score: 1

      Or you bought a DRM'd thing during an irrational lapse of judgement.

      If "you're OK getting something like Portal", either it wasn't a lapse of judgement or said lapse is continuing.

    14. Re:Depends, but will probably get it by Vreejack · · Score: 2

      I play Netflix through my 360 and I wasn't even aware that the Live Gold subscription was required...that's really screwed up when you figure all Microsoft is doing is providing the initial reference URL for the hookup. But you know what? It doesn't matter now because I just got a RROD. Time to can-x the Xbox Live, I guess.

      --
      "Will future ages believe that such stupid bigotry ever existed!" -- Ivanhoe
    15. Re:Depends, but will probably get it by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      I'm talking about a hypothetical situation where somebody bought Portal but regrets their hypocrisy (re: DRM) now. In other words, a "you're usually not OK with it, but sometimes can't help yourself" thing.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    16. Re:Depends, but will probably get it by EvanED · · Score: 1

      They're games; have some principle.

      But here's the thing; in some sense, I don't really view it as as ethical or moral issue. (Of course, it becomes such if it isn't disclosed.) To me, it's just another angle on the business transaction of purchasing the game. I understand people who do view it that way, but I am not one of them and nor are most people I suspect.

      I mean, take one of the things that people say about DRM: that it's "defective by design." Let's assume that I agree with that. Well, here's the thing -- it's quite reasonable to knowingly buy defective stuff! There are outlet stores and whatnot where they have racks of clothes for instance where there's something wrong, and they are sold at a discount. If I can get something that, practically speaking, works pretty well as a shirt and doesn't look too bad, why wouldn't buy it? Sure, I'm not going to pay full price, but I'm not going to leave it on the rack out of principle. Same with games; maybe I'd be willing to have paid $60 for Mass Effect 3 without DRM, but since it's on the defective rack, I waited until I could get it for $30. If it was on some "really defective, you have to be online to wear this" rack, maybe it'd have dropped to $5 or $10.

      The only ethical concern to me is the slippery slope: if you can't get DRM-free programs at all, and stuff like that. But that's not now. (Actually the "they're games" argument works in favor of my position, because there's a much less compelling argument re. vendor lockin. If Valve cuts off access to Portal or something I'll be pissed, but it's not like my livelihood will be threatened or I'll be unable to access years' of work.)

    17. Re:Depends, but will probably get it by hinchles · · Score: 1

      Apart from XBL is £50 a year sky with HD box + all the channels is £90 a month!

    18. Re:Depends, but will probably get it by thehumble1 · · Score: 1

      My Live Gold yearly is $35 recurring through M$. I got a deal through Amazon and when I called in about it, they M$ rep matched the price for me on a recurring basis. Def. worth it if you do anything more than Netflix. If that's all you do, why do you have a xBox? It's true that the offline gamers are going to get screwed.

  5. What? What happened to 359? by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 3, Funny

    What the hell is wrong with their numbering conventions? They went from Xbox 360 to Xbox 1? Are they starting all over again from version 1? Why? Is it because finally they have erased all the sunken costs and the franchise is finally in the black? On the windows they went DOS 3.1 to Win95, Win98, Millenium, Win2K, Vista and then finally discovered their first grade math, Win7,8,9...

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:What? What happened to 359? by neo-mkrey · · Score: 1

      How could you leave off the best OS that MS ever made -- XP?

    2. Re:What? What happened to 359? by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1

      Each version number is a lesson in history about versions and branding. In the late 90s, "2000" was the big thing that everyone was excited about. "XP" probably would've been called "Windows Extreme" edition if they could get away with it at the time. "360" was supposed to sound holistic, or at least all-observing.

      "One" reflects a drive toward simplicity, and yet still captures the idea that it encompasses everything; it's not an ordinal. You can trust that the next one won't be called "Xbox Two".

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    3. Re:What? What happened to 359? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      XP was for "experience". 360 was because the PS3 was due and Microsoft didn't want to release a product numbered one lower.

      Rather than one it seems like zero might have been a better choice. I half expected them to go with 8 and a Metro style dashboard.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    4. Re:What? What happened to 359? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Technically, at release, Windows XP was mostly just Windows 2000 with the Luna UI and USB support built-in...

      Although, you could say the same about Win-7, since it was primarily just a slight UI-tweak, and CPU/GPU optimization upgrade from Vista...

      -AC

    5. Re:What? What happened to 359? by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 2

      "eXPerience" was a blatant retronym that marketing made up so they could get an X in there. There was little or no discussion of "experience" in the Whistler interface until late in development.

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    6. Re:What? What happened to 359? by Black+Parrot · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What the hell is wrong with their numbering conventions? They went from Xbox 360 to Xbox 1? Are they starting all over again from version 1?

      No, they just switched to a mod 360 versioning system.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    7. Re:What? What happened to 359? by Megane · · Score: 1

      So the third Xbox has been named "Xbox One"? BRILLIANT. I knew all along it wasn't going to be 720. That would have been just too stupid. I personally thought "Xbox Live" would have been a great name, but they've been ditching the Live branding, so I knew that wouldn't happen either. I heard "Xbox Infinity" as a possible name, and while still goofy, that still would have been better than what they picked.

      For bonus points, do a GIS for Xbox One. Yeah, it's full of the old HUEG Xbox. And a few pimped and gimped 360s as well.

      Oh well, at least they didn't pull an Apple and label it "The New Xbox(tm)".

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    8. Re:What? What happened to 359? by Megane · · Score: 2

      XP was more likely a reference to the Greek letters chi and rho, which were in turn a reference the code name "Cairo".

      That "experience" thing sounds like the kind of bull you come up with after the fact to explain it so that the Alex Jones types don't go ballistic.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    9. Re:What? What happened to 359? by synapse7 · · Score: 1

      I don't believe it is "xbox 1", the name is a play on words and should sound like "361", I think. I'm not going to pretend to understand marketing.

    10. Re:What? What happened to 359? by sixoseven · · Score: 1

      That would be called Marketing. You know, that subject in which you took no classes whatsoever.

      --
      fault-tolerant
    11. Re:What? What happened to 359? by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Oh well, at least they didn't pull an Apple and label it "The New Xbox(tm)".

      Volkswagen is even worse about that. First they had the old air-cooled Beetle (except it was actually called the "Type 1"), then they had the "New Beetle" (from 1998 to 2011), and now they have the "Beetle" (from 2012 on). So now, to avoid confusion, I have to refer to my 1998 model as my "old New Beetle" and my friend with a 2013 model has to refer to it as a "2012 Beetle" because if he calls it simply "new" people will think it's the 1998-2011 version!

      (And no matter what we call it, we'll still get asked "is the engine in the back?")

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    12. Re:What? What happened to 359? by similar_name · · Score: 1

      Win95, Win98 and Millenium are all version 4. Win2k and Xp were version 5. Windows 3.x preceded Windows 95. At least kernel versions make some sense.

    13. Re:What? What happened to 359? by Joviex · · Score: 1

      You can trust that the next one won't be called "Xbox Two".

      After the display I watched, I'd be suprised if there is a next one after the Xbox One. It seems they are playing themselves out the market rather easily. SteamBox and Ouya will most likely provide all the gaming needs we require in the near future, minus the draconian "ALL IN ONE" box bullshit idea. I have a PVR -- TV covered. Do I really need this multimedia center to be vastly overpriced and underpowered versus a 3 year old PC? to play MP3s and Fantasy Football? LOL. No thanks.

    14. Re:What? What happened to 359? by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      From the company that brought you Windows 3.1, 3.11, 95, 98, Me, XP, Vista and then 8.

      Yes, that company.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    15. Re:What? What happened to 359? by Thanatiel · · Score: 1

      What the hell is wrong with their numbering conventions? They went from Xbox 360 to Xbox 1? Are they starting all over again from version 1?

      No, they just switched to a mod 360 versioning system.

      Then it should be Xbox Zero

      --
      Irrelevant news and morons using moderation to mod down what they disagree on. 2018 resolution: so long.
    16. Re:What? What happened to 359? by Thanatiel · · Score: 1

      It would still feels weird with a mod 360 ...
      x being in N

      1 360 129600 -> Zero (360^x)
      1 360 720 ... -> Zero ((x==1)?1:0 + 359 * x ... weird, I know, but I'm in an hurry.
      1 360 719 -> 359 (1 + 359 * x)
      1 360 361 -> One ((x + 1)& 1 + 360 ... I don't even see what the fourth number would be)

      Sony called its PSX "PS One" when it was becoming obsolete.
      Maybe it's what they expect about this already low-middle range PC.

      --
      Irrelevant news and morons using moderation to mod down what they disagree on. 2018 resolution: so long.
    17. Re:What? What happened to 359? by Necroloth · · Score: 1

      One box to rule them all...

    18. Re:What? What happened to 359? by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1

      All-in-one systems tend to be efforts to target specific markets. A lot of people on Slashdot were confused when the PS3 had a web browser in it, for example, but such a convergence of devices makes a lot of sense in a tiny Japanese apartment. It's one of those features where you have to remind yourself that it may still have appeal to the market as a whole even if you don't like it yourself.

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
  6. Xbox One? by Andrio · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Didn't that come out like 12 years ago?

    --
    The Internet King? I wonder if he could provide faster nudity.
    1. Re:Xbox One? by dmomo · · Score: 5, Funny

      Brace yourself for the awesome as I go to every gamestop to buy every first generation XBox for $40 a pop. Once the new console is released, I'll sell them on EBay as "XBox 1, slightly used, only $200".

  7. Wait for it.... by tekrat · · Score: 4, Funny

    And it comes with Windows 8 (crickets...)

    --
    If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
    1. Re:Wait for it.... by MatthiasF · · Score: 1, Troll

      Nay, Windows 8.1! (fake cheers from paid shills)

    2. Re:Wait for it.... by Megane · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Don't you mean "Windows 8 One"?

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    3. Re:Wait for it.... by Aqualung812 · · Score: 4, Funny

      I actually do like Windows 8.
      A lot less eye candy

      It is perfectly clear to me that either you have not used Windows 7, or you have not used Windows 8.

      --
      Grammer Nazis - I mod you "troll" unless you actually add something on-topic. Yes, I know I have mispellings in my sig.
    4. Re:Wait for it.... by Barlo_Mung_42 · · Score: 1

      Actually it's running three OSs at the same time.

    5. Re:Wait for it.... by ildon · · Score: 1

      Technically they call them "employees."

    6. Re:Wait for it.... by CityZen · · Score: 1

      Oh boy, 3 times the updates! 3 times the day-0 exploits! This will be fun.

  8. Cable integration? by jandrese · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I really hope this means every XBox will come with a Cablecard slot in the back, just so Microsoft can cause every Cable Company manager's head to explode at the same time when they announce the feature.

    --

    I read the internet for the articles.
    1. Re:Cable integration? by F34nor · · Score: 4, Interesting

      If each household with a subscription buys $150 worth of Comcast stock every month for the next three years we could own them and fire them,

    2. Re:Cable integration? by nwf · · Score: 1

      I really hope this means every XBox will come with a Cablecard slot in the back, just so Microsoft can cause every Cable Company manager's head to explode at the same time when they announce the feature.

      That would be about the only thing that would make be interested in buying one. That and if the subscription (which I'm sure it will require) is cheap enough. My Verizon DVR blows chunks. My old ReplayTV from 15 years ago had a better and more responsive interface than the crap Comcast and Verizon are pushing.

      The new Kinect sounds neat, and much better than anything Sony will likely have. (In fairness, I have a PS3 and not an XBox 360.) I've never wanted to browse the web on my TV, so that part is useless. About the only app I care about is Netflix and maybe some other video providers, but my cheap Sony Bluray player can do all that as can the PS3 already.

      No mention of GPU specs? That's telling. Seems more like an AppleTV with gaming.

      --
      I don't know, but it works for me.
    3. Re:Cable integration? by TWiTfan · · Score: 1

      I bet it won't have cablecard slots. It will probably be either some kludgy IR blaster or some sort of interactive HDMI connection that won't work with 90% of cable boxes out there, thus rendering one of its biggest selling points basically worthless for the vast majority of users. This is MS we're talking about, after all.

      --
      The cow says "Moo." The dog says "Woof." The Timothy says "Thanks, valued customer. We appreciate your input."
  9. XBMC by elzurawka · · Score: 5, Interesting

    So basically all the features I have been using for the last 3 years on XBMC + Steam, except for Voice and motion input(which i think are silly and I don't want).

    --
    -EL
    1. Re:XBMC by F34nor · · Score: 1

      Not only silly FUCKING annoying. The dogs tail sets of the Kinect all the time and worse when I was playing Skyrim **FUCKING DIALOGUE** activated commands in the game.

      All I want from Kinect is a Gesis style visualizer for music with interaction.

    2. Re:XBMC by Nrrqshrr · · Score: 2

      Well.. to sum it all up, check Sony's stock. 18 minutes worth of conference on a game console, probably only something like 8 minutes concerning games, the rest is for gimmicks. What could I possibly say?

    3. Re:XBMC by knight24k · · Score: 4, Funny

      Not only silly FUCKING annoying. The dogs tail sets of the Kinect all the time and worse when I was playing Skyrim **FUCKING DIALOGUE** activated commands in the game.

      All I want from Kinect is a Gesis style visualizer for music with interaction.

      Saw this little idea on another site (wish I could take credit for it, but meh). Sony creates new ad campaign. Ad starts out with "XBox, Off!"

      Troll level - Over 9000!!


      hehehe

    4. Re:XBMC by TWiTfan · · Score: 1

      But it's got Halo! Remember Halo? Well, it's back, in TV show form!

      --
      The cow says "Moo." The dog says "Woof." The Timothy says "Thanks, valued customer. We appreciate your input."
    5. Re:XBMC by complete+loony · · Score: 1

      Probably wouldn't work. If the XBOX is controlling the TV, it would be using some form of acoustic echo cancellation to ignore the sound.

      --
      09F91102 no, 455FE104 nope, F190A1E8 uh-uh, 7A5F8A09 that's not it, C87294CE no. Ah! 452F6E403CDF10714E41DFAA257D313F.
    6. Re:XBMC by Kalriath · · Score: 1

      It would have to be "Xbox, Settings, Turn Off, Yes" - and there's a 50/50 chance that halfway through it misinterprets something and just locks up until followed by "Cancel"

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
  10. one by Ian+0x57 · · Score: 5, Informative

    before everyone jumps in on the "i thought this was version 3 not 1" bandwagon - it means ONE as in ONE tool to do it all. not ONE as in version 1 of the product line....

    1. Re:one by dougisfunny · · Score: 2

      So, 3.1?

      --
      This is not the funny you're looking for.
    2. Re:one by SirGarlon · · Score: 1

      Yes, but that is marketing-speak and even more worthy of derision. The thing about the real numbers is they have a natural total order that is independent of whatever brand identity the marketing department wants to create. Naming this Xbox "One" makes as much sense in terms of numbers as does naming it "Xbox -317.4564896078." I wonder how many of the people responsible for naming versions of Java ended up at Microsoft.

      --
      [Sir Garlon] is the marvellest knight that is now living, for he destroyeth many good knights, for he goeth invisible.
    3. Re:one by PRMan · · Score: 1

      Xbox 720 would have been way cooler...

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    4. Re:one by VortexCortex · · Score: 1

      Then they should have used the standard metric for "one tool to do it all" and called it the (subpar) Windows Gaming PC.

    5. Re:one by fldsofglry · · Score: 1

      So if you get the red ring of death, does that mean it is ONE ring to rule them all?

    6. Re:one by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      I think most consumers can do basic math and 3 > 1. If they wanted to get away from numerical ordering then don't use anything that resembles a number: Xbox Absolute.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    7. Re:one by meta-monkey · · Score: 1

      Do you know why they call it the Xbox One? Because you take one look at it, turn 360 degrees and walk away.

      (Insert ASCII trollface here)

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    8. Re:one by fluor2 · · Score: 1

      as in one tool to rule them all?

    9. Re:one by Volguus+Zildrohar · · Score: 1

      the high functioning human market

      That's too small a market for Microsoft to care about. They're more likely aiming for the barely functioning humans...

      --
      When confronted with one problem, some think "I'll use recursion". Now they are confronted with one problem.
    10. Re:one by Kaenneth · · Score: 1

      Do you know why they call it the Xbox One? Because you take one look at it, turn 360 degrees and walk away.

      (Insert ASCII trollface here)

      How about "turn one full circle and walk away."

    11. Re:one by EvanED · · Score: 1

      Although, what would you have called its successor... Xbox Infinity-Plus-One?

      The Xbox Aleph-1.

    12. Re:one by EvanED · · Score: 1

      Oooo, or the Xbox Continuum. That actually even sounds kind of markety.

    13. Re:one by amanaplanacanalpanam · · Score: 1

      ONE tool to do it all

      That gives me an idea I hadn't thought of before. Microsoft has never sought to convert the masses, convincing them to fall in love the company of their own free will (ostensibly) - that's Apple's game. No, they've always just sought to dominate.

      I hereby submit that Slashdot's Microsoft icon (Gates Borg) be replaced with Gates Saruman. The Apple icon should really be Jobs Borg (he didn't die, he was just fully assimilated).

    14. Re:one by Kalriath · · Score: 1

      Newer generation Xbox 360s do not actually have red LEDs any more. Errors are simply displayed as cryptic numbers on the screen

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
    15. Re:one by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      So, 3.1?

      No, they'll want to emphasize the 1, so obviously 3.11.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    16. Re:one by BetterThanCaesar · · Score: 1

      Xbox for Workgroups?

      --
      "Stop failing the Turing test!" -- Dilbert
    17. Re:one by oji-sama · · Score: 1

      Xbox 720 would have been way cooler...

      Nah, it should be at least FullHD.

      --
      It is what it is.
    18. Re:one by 3.5+stripes · · Score: 1

      You mean 180 degrees, you hydrocephalic reprobate.

      --


      He tried to kill me with a forklift!
    19. Re:one by meta-monkey · · Score: 1

      Yhl. Yhbt. Hand.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
  11. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1

    If it does fail, I'm voting price point; with specs like this, I can't imagine how it would be cheaper than a Surface Pro, which is already a disaster in part because of its price. But the Xbox customer base is pretty loyal; that might not be enough to stop them.

    --
    Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
  12. Microsoft's attempt at a do-everything box by JDG1980 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Looks like the Xbox One is a home-entertainment center for which gaming is mostly an afterthought.

    That's not necessarily a bad thing (hardcore gamers aren't nearly as important of a demographic as they think), but a lack of focus could be a real problem. We already have general-purpose machines that are versatile enough to do what we want them to. Microsoft needs to make the case why this is better than a laptop or a tablet or a smartphone – especially as it is certain to be loaded down with DRM.

    1. Re:Microsoft's attempt at a do-everything box by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I wonder what all the TV stuff is getting replaced with in countries that aren't the US.

    2. Re:Microsoft's attempt at a do-everything box by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I of course understand that hardcore games aren't the big audience anymore, but it just has this "asshole" feeling when you pretty much drop everybody who made you big.

    3. Re:Microsoft's attempt at a do-everything box by Alkonaut · · Score: 1

      Well, to be honest the gaming is the simple bit. You know that if you upgrade a gaming rig after 5 years it will be awesome. And all the gamers just want the next Halo/Fifa/CoD anyway, so what more do you want? Microsoft seem confident to take the livingroom before Sony/Samsung/LG/Apple/Google do, so this is their attempt. I think they are pretty confident in their gamer-customer base.

    4. Re:Microsoft's attempt at a do-everything box by jittles · · Score: 1

      Looks like the Xbox One is a home-entertainment center for which gaming is mostly an afterthought.

      That's not necessarily a bad thing (hardcore gamers aren't nearly as important of a demographic as they think), but a lack of focus could be a real problem. We already have general-purpose machines that are versatile enough to do what we want them to. Microsoft needs to make the case why this is better than a laptop or a tablet or a smartphone – especially as it is certain to be loaded down with DRM.

      This is exactly how the XBox 360 is now. You can do NetFlix, Amazon Video, ESPN3, etc. Now its going to be better integrated into the main OS, I would imagine.

    5. Re:Microsoft's attempt at a do-everything box by sixoseven · · Score: 2

      Gaming as an afterthought? Did you not see the head of COD, the most profitable game in existence, tell you that they rewrote their engine for this next generation console?

      --
      fault-tolerant
    6. Re:Microsoft's attempt at a do-everything box by ArsonSmith · · Score: 3, Funny

      There are countries that aren't the US?

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    7. Re:Microsoft's attempt at a do-everything box by JDG1980 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Don't even get me started on using a PC/laptop to output to a TV. I've tried to explain a simple "PC video > HDTV, PC audio > sound system" setup to people and been flatly told to shut up and just make it work.

      It's no more difficult to hook up a modern PC to a HDTV than it is to hook up any other device. Your description above implies they are using a separate sound system (not the TV's speakers) so it would go something like this:

      • 1. Connect a HDMI cable from the PC's HDMI output to an HDMI input on your A/V receiver
      • 2. Connect a HDMI cable from the A/V receiver's video output to a HDMI input on your TV
      • 3. Set the TV so it displays input from the HDMI input you used
      • 4. Set the A/V receiver so it plays sound from the HDMI input you used
      • 5. Turn on the PC and set the resolution to match the TV's resolution.

      And if they don't care about surround sound, then all you have to do is wire the PC straight to the TV via HDMI. How much simpler than this can it get? If someone can't figure that out, then they won't be able to figure out how to connect any modern audiovisual device, including a game console.

      If someone is too stupid to figure out how to set up their PC to play Netflix, they can always buy a Roku box. It'll be significantly cheaper than the Xbox One and better suited to that particular purpose.

    8. Re:Microsoft's attempt at a do-everything box by cluedweasel · · Score: 1

      No doubt the local versions of the content. In the UK, it could have Freeview (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freeview_%28UK%29) built in. It would also have BBC iPlayer, ITV Player, 4OD and maybe a TV Catchup app.

    9. Re:Microsoft's attempt at a do-everything box by Kjella · · Score: 1

      I have that setup.... but it's a dark arts test every time to find the right order of turning on/tuning in the devices in right order to make it actually work. Usually I have to disconnect and reconnect the cable from the PC to my surround receiver as well. I blame HDCP, clearly they have some sort of handshake issues. The TV I had before that would only work with direct source -> TV connections, going via a receiver meant no signal. Again it appears to be a HDCP handshake issue, the pass-through added just enough latency that it didn't work. Kill it with fire.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    10. Re:Microsoft's attempt at a do-everything box by caywen · · Score: 1

      Looks like the Xbox One is a home-entertainment center for which gaming is mostly an afterthought.

      Is that how it looks? The thing has gaming specs on par with PS4, motion sensors, and dedicated game controllers. It has its own OS partition to handle games.

      How is that an afterthought?

      Perhaps you meant:

      "Looks like the Xbox One is a home-entertainment center for which gaming is a major feature."

    11. Re:Microsoft's attempt at a do-everything box by Alkonaut · · Score: 1

      You sir are a rounding error in microsofts bottom line. Next you'll say you don't want always on requirements, and after that you'll want to sell "used games". I think you need to look elsewhere for your gaming fix.

    12. Re:Microsoft's attempt at a do-everything box by pokeparadox · · Score: 1

      That's fine if you like CoD I guess...

    13. Re:Microsoft's attempt at a do-everything box by tmagic · · Score: 1

      Oh, will this 'just work' for surround sound gaming? And for watching blu-ray discs? The hundreds of threads on various av forums might suggest otherwise. Just google 'HDMI DTS Passthrough'. And those are threads by people technically literate enough to post their query/problem in an av forum.

    14. Re:Microsoft's attempt at a do-everything box by gameboyhippo · · Score: 1

      So brave...

  13. Always on internet? by gstoddart · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So far I've not seen anything about the always-on requirement for the internet connection.

    That feature is make or break for me, because if it *needs* an internet connection to be always enabled, I can tell you now I won't buy this -- they had their chance, and they put ads into both my home screen and my games.

    Did anyone who actually watched the event see anything about this? I've checked several articles so far, and none of them have mentioned that part.

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    1. Re:Always on internet? by frozentier · · Score: 3, Informative

      So far I've not seen anything about the always-on requirement for the internet connection.

      If games ONLY save to the cloud, then that IS the always-on internet requirement. Otherwise you have to start a new game every time you put the disc in, and you can't save your progress.

    2. Re:Always on internet? by gmezero · · Score: 3

      Well, they said save game data will be stored on the cloud. That right there would be the needed internet connection... and that alone will prevent me from buying one. Period.

    3. Re:Always on internet? by gstoddart · · Score: 2

      Well, then if game saves will go to the cloud and require an internet connection, I most definitely will NOT be buying a new XBox.

      I might buy another Xbox 360 as a spare for my current one and to keep playing the games I do. But if I can't run this thing purely as a game console with no internet connection, then I have no interest in it.

      A requirement for an internet connection doesn't benefit me personally, just Microsoft, the publishers, and the advertisers. And that's not my problem.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    4. Re:Always on internet? by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Informative

      So far I've not seen anything about the always-on requirement for the internet connection.

      that is because, shock amazement, you did not RTFA.

      [...] it also possesses a low-power standby mode, allowing Xbox Live and game updates to be pushed to the Xbox One overnight â" or whenever the box knows your usage is lowest â" without keeping the console all the way on. (Donâ(TM)t worry; you can still play a single-player game without being connected to the Internet.)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    5. Re:Always on internet? by N0Man74 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Well, they said save game data will be stored on the cloud. That right there would be the needed internet connection... and that alone will prevent me from buying one. Period.

      Ability does not mean requirement. Many steam games allow you to save to the cloud, but still allow for local saving of games additionally.

      Though, I honestly expect that they are pushing to make it a requirement.. and yes, it will be a deal-breaker for me.

      Honestly, right now I don't even have home internet access aside from limited mobile tethering. I canceled in anticipation of moving (which got unexpectedly delayed) a month ago and because ComCast (only 1 of 2 carriers available to me in a city of population density of over 2,000/sq.mile) was being ridiculous.

      I rarely play on my 360, but if my cable TV and internet was out, playing single-player console video games would be among the things I might I might want to do during the outage.

      I guess that means Microsoft will just encourage me to read more rather than buy their console. Not so bad I suppose.

    6. Re:Always on internet? by organgtool · · Score: 1

      [...] it also possesses a low-power standby mode, allowing Xbox Live and game updates to be pushed to the Xbox One overnight â" or whenever the box knows your usage is lowest â" without keeping the console all the way on. (Donâ(TM)t worry; you can still play a single-player game without being connected to the Internet.)

      No thanks! I lost my savepoint in a difficult level of Call of Duty: World at War on Veteran due to a game upgrade. Now, if I have any savepoints, I don't allow the game to update until I have beaten the game. Even if they had an option to disable this feature, I still probably won't buy the console because the first software update would likely set this option back to enabled in typical Microsoft fashion.

    7. Re:Always on internet? by sixoseven · · Score: 1

      Red herring. You know what kills me is that this is exactly the kind of mindless thrash that hated on AT&T + Apple when they got the idea that they *wouldn't* have always on internet.

      --
      fault-tolerant
    8. Re:Always on internet? by ZombieBraintrust · · Score: 1

      No, they are selling cloud gaming services to developers. If they use the cloud the same way WOW does then the game will be online only. So you may get single player games that are online only. But it is up to the developer.

    9. Re:Always on internet? by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      Red herring.

      Red Herring in exactly what way? I as a consumer am saying that my purchase of a newer Xbox is contingent on still being able to play single-player games offline, and not see ads in my games console because I won't connect it to the network.

      You know what kills me is that this is exactly the kind of mindless thrash that hated on AT&T + Apple when they got the idea that they *wouldn't* have always on internet.

      OK, I see you've chosen to inject your own red-herring into the discussion so you could vent some hate for AT&T + Apple.

      Tell you what, you make product choices based on your criteria, and I'll make them based on mine.

      The ability to run an Xbox without connecting it at all to the network is a requirement for me. Because the rest of the 'entertainment console' features Microsoft is offering aren't anything I'm interested in. It's a video game console, and that's all I'll ever use it for. Everything else is just stuff I don't care about.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    10. Re:Always on internet? by jsepeta · · Score: 1

      let me know when Microsoft can make sure my internet stays on. i'd rather them fight with AT&T U-Verse than make me do it.

      --
      Remember kids, if you're not paying for the service, YOU ARE THE PRODUCT THAT IS BEING SOLD.
    11. Re:Always on internet? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      To be honest, I'm buying an Ouya, and I'm going to use it to play emulators, run XBMC, and play whichever of my Android games can be coaxed to run on it without too many expensive additional apps. I expect I will cough up the five or six bucks to get some software to emulate touches from a game controller, which might even end up being a PS3 controller.

      I am not even considering giving Microsoft or Sony my money in this generation. Ironically given how long I've hated them, Microsoft could have a chance at it eventually (when the device has had its price reductions, down the line) if only they would make Xbox Live multiplayer free. Or if this Azure linking actually paid off and they really provided something for your low low fee (and Live can be had for truly little money once or twice a year) and you got low lag servers running on their cloud computing service rather than getting to pay for shitty multiplayer matching and then getting to host the game over your consumer-grade internet connection as well, I might actually consider paying for Live.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    12. Re:Always on internet? by GoogleShill · · Score: 1

      There still is no need for an internet connection. Save games take up very little space on the HD and can be synchronized up the cloud when a connection is available. Kind of... ok, EXACTLY like the PS3 does now.

      My friends and I like to bring consoles up to mountain cabins where there is no 'net connection, but power and TVs. This "feature" would make that impossible.

    13. Re:Always on internet? by iczerjones · · Score: 1

      Engadget linked to a Microsoft FAQ regarding a few key questions. IMO, it is filled with some class act doublespeak. Quite amusing, if not a bit frustrating, to read. http://news.xbox.com/2013/05/qa

    14. Re:Always on internet? by bloodhawk · · Score: 1

      I doubt anyone that is willing to settle for something like the ouya is the target audience of any of the big 3.

    15. Re:Always on internet? by MemoryDragon · · Score: 1

      The always on info came rather late, according to several news sites, you must have a connection every once in 24 hourse and kinect has to be on as soon as the console is on, games must be enabled online once via code. This thing is DOA if you ask me.

    16. Re:Always on internet? by Ash+Vince · · Score: 1

      So far I've not seen anything about the always-on requirement for the internet connection.

      That feature is make or break for me, because if it *needs* an internet connection to be always enabled, I can tell you now I won't buy this -- they had their chance, and they put ads into both my home screen and my games.

      Did anyone who actually watched the event see anything about this? I've checked several articles so far, and none of them have mentioned that part.

      Always on internet definitely not needed according to this: http://www.gamesindustry.biz/articles/2013-05-21-xbox-always-online-the-answer-is-no

      --
      I dont read /. to RTFA, I read /. to offend people in ignorance.
    17. Re:Always on internet? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I doubt anyone that is willing to settle for something like the ouya is the target audience of any of the big 3.

      Well, you're wrong. First, the Ouya is as powerful as the Wii U. Second, the audience is "people who are spending money on games". All market leaders now sell both serious and casual games.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    18. Re:Always on internet? by bloodhawk · · Score: 1

      You are talking about trying to avoid spending money, happy to waste time trying to get android games working on it and are looking at emulators to play old games. you are NOT their target audience, there is nothing wrong with that. Their target audiences are those that spend money on entertainment, those that are willing to fork out for the next COD/Halo/Uncharted/Mario etc etc. those that are looking for something new (though arguably things like COD X hardly qualifies, but that is what they want). People willing to settle for old tech, low powered and playing android low end games or emulators are NOT the target audience. The Ouya being almost as powerful as the flop that is the Wii U is nothing to brag about, if this was 2005 that would be a boasting point.

    19. Re:Always on internet? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Get back to me when Microsoft's entertainment division is as profitable as Nintendo.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    20. Re:Always on internet? by bloodhawk · · Score: 1

      For the last year or so it has been MORE profitable than nintendo. Nintendo made a loss, MS gaming division has been making successive profits for the last 2-3 years.

  14. First thoughts by RogueyWon · · Score: 1

    The name sucks.

    No word yet on always-online or used-game restrictions. Sony were quick to rule these out for the PS4; that MS haven't makes me suspect that they're going to do them. That's a mistake (the latter in particular).

    The hardware inside the box seems ok on the limited information we have to go on so far. 8 gigs of RAM is good.

    Improved voice and gesture controls are a good thing, actually. They worked really well on the second-generation 360 dashboard. Just a pity they're much less useful on the latest dashboard.

    Controller looks ok. Probably slightly better than the PS4 controller.

    Not much of interest to me in the game announcements bar Forza (and maybe Remedy). But then, given I'm not into non-driving sports games or spunkgargleweewee, I wasn't particularly expecting there to be. Launch titles (with a few honourable exceptions) are usually crap anyway, so not going to get too worried about that.

    Blu-Ray drive is a good thing.

    Not really enough information here to make a judgement call. However, the continuing worry over always-online and used-restrictions, tied with a sense that MS isn't really interested in gamers outside of the dudebro fraternity (or indeed gamers at all, rather than people who want to watch TV), makes me suspect that MS have missed quite a few tricks here. Sony's PS4 reveal inspired more confidence and I suspect they've set themselves up for a better launch.

  15. Does it have tv tunner? cable card? satellite TV? by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 2

    Does it have tv tunner? cable card? satellite TV?

  16. Blu-ray player? by neo-mkrey · · Score: 1

    Surely this is a typo -- I could have sworn that MS pledged never to put that into one of their consoles.

    1. Re:Blu-ray player? by VGPowerlord · · Score: 1

      Surely this is a typo -- I could have sworn that MS pledged never to put that into one of their consoles.

      That was before HD-DVD died.

      --
      GLaDOS for President 2016! "Well here we are again. It's always such a pleasure." -- GLaDOS, 2011
    2. Re:Blu-ray player? by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      Did you miss the spectacular failure of their competing standard? You know, the format nobody has made a movie for in a several years?

      I don't see how they could do anything but support BluRay.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    3. Re:Blu-ray player? by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      And before Blu-ray drives got fast enough to keep up with the rest of the system.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  17. Re:Does it have tv tunner? cable card? satellite T by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    Tuner. It's tuner you illiterate tool.

  18. Wait, what? by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 5, Funny

    Does "You can turn the console on by voice" mean when "off" this thing is actually running a voice recognition system waiting for you to turn it "on"? Ignoring the "it's constantly listening to what is going on" part: what did they say the "standby" power use was?

    --
    Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
    1. Re:Wait, what? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Funny

      Also what happens when more devices start to support voice control, or you have two XBOXs in proximity? You say "off" and and your XBOX, TV, hifi, laptop, phone, tablet, air conditioning and lights all turn off simultaneously.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    2. Re:Wait, what? by i+kan+reed · · Score: 2

      It means Microsoft fully intends to spy on their customers all the time. Buried in line 4012 of the EULA of the first system update.

    3. Re:Wait, what? by gbjbaanb · · Score: 1

      One of the big changes is increased support for voice and and gesture input. You can turn the console on by voice, and it will recognize you and automatically login

      and will it recognise "what? fuck off bloody xbox crap, no I do not want ads, I was trying to watch the flipping tv, you damn pile of crap, bugger off, off. no off. fucking thing. OFF."

      But think, if its sitting there in an "always on" standby listing to your voice, do you think it'll also be watching you via the kinect camera? I'm sure it will eventually if its always online too.

    4. Re:Wait, what? by Carewolf · · Score: 1

      I read that as, the device will constantly be broadcasting everything going on in your living room to Microsofts new 300000 servers. Eventhough it may be powerfull enough to do the voice processing itself, I doubt they will pass a chance at an excuse for live-snooping every living room. Everybody seems to be getting away with it on the phones anyway.

    5. Re:Wait, what? by grumpy_old_grandpa · · Score: 1

      > You say "off" and and your XBOX, TV, hifi, laptop, phone, tablet, air conditioning and lights all turn off simultaneously.

      Well, I suppose you'll have to address each device by its manufacturer and product name, e.g. "Google Glass, take a picture". Which of course will still fail in your first example. So, we'll have to come up with some kind of unique identifier for devices. Let's make it at 256 bit number, and call it... IP7! Now, if there only was a way to map a number to a more human readable name...

      "AmiMoJo-dot-xbox-dot-microsoft-dot-com, please turn on!"

    6. Re:Wait, what? by Rogue+Haggis+Landing · · Score: 2

      Also what happens when more devices start to support voice control, or you have two XBOXs in proximity? You say "off" and and your XBOX, TV, hifi, laptop, phone, tablet, air conditioning and lights all turn off simultaneously.

      I'm starting to think that my voice controlled pacemaker was a bad idea!

    7. Re:Wait, what? by Zeromous · · Score: 1

      Ok Take a Picture.

      --
      ---Up Up Down Down Left Right Left Right B A START
    8. Re:Wait, what? by Wescotte · · Score: 1

      It did seem like he got the machine's attention by saying "Xbox" and then the command. However, it seemed like there was some sort of window in place where it just assumed when it detected a possible command you were talking to it. Felt very Star Trekish in that the computer just knew when you were giving it commands vs just talking. I'm pretty skeptical of voice commands but voice recognition has gotten pretty damn accurate in the last few years so who knows...

    9. Re:Wait, what? by BillX · · Score: 1

      "Voodoo dick, get back in your box"

      --
      Caveat Emptor is not a business model.
    10. Re:Wait, what? by PowerBook2k · · Score: 1

      Actually, when owners of Xbox 360s with Kinects were watching the live stream of the announcement, the presenters' commands on stage were controlling the viewers' Xboxes.

      http://www.polygon.com/2013/5/21/4353010/kinect-trouble-xbox-one-reveal

    11. Re:Wait, what? by ElusiveJoe · · Score: 1

      You say "off" and and your XBOX, TV, hifi, laptop, phone, tablet, air conditioning and lights all turn off simultaneously.

      Just make sure there are no people with cardiac stimulators nearby when you say it.

    12. Re:Wait, what? by shikaisi · · Score: 1

      Parents are going to love this if they can walk into their kid's room and just say "Turn that Xbox off". Gamers maybe less so.

      --
      No left turn unstoned.
  19. there needs to be 1 box at the drop point that fee by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    there needs to be 1 box at the drop point that feeds any system you have on your own network. But that is to much as the cable co's like to have you rent over priced hardware at high prices. At least in canada you can buy the boxes with no outlet / mirroring fees.

  20. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by skirmish666 · · Score: 2

    "5 billion transistors", also the number of square feet needed to use kinect?

    --
    Sigger than your average
  21. Installation notes. by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

    One of the big changes is increased support for voice and and gesture input. ... The Kinect sensor got an upgrade: ... has finer skeletal visibility, can detect minor orientation changes in hands and fingers, and can even calculate your balance and weight distribution.

    Do not install Xbox One in the bedroom and/or avoid having sex in the same room as your Xbox One.

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    1. Re:Installation notes. by Black+Parrot · · Score: 5, Funny

      Do not install Xbox One in the bedroom and/or avoid having sex in the same room as your Xbox One.

      Which room does your Xbox One have sex in?

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    2. Re:Installation notes. by EvilSS · · Score: 1

      Hrm.... Actually with the right accessories that could make for some interesting multiplayer game play....

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
    3. Re:Installation notes. by Curate · · Score: 2

      Xbox One + Xbox One = Xbox Three ?

  22. Waiting for the jokes by egcagrac0 · · Score: 1

    "They call it the Xbox One, since when you see it, you turn 1 radian and walk away."

    How's the new red ring of death look on this one?

    1. Re:Waiting for the jokes by egcagrac0 · · Score: 1

      Uhh, whoosh.

      The old joke about turning 360 degrees and walking away doesn't work much better.

  23. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by AmiMoJo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Easy, they will sell it at below cost, like console manufacturers always do at first. Both Sony and Microsoft lost money on every console they ever released until well into their lifecycles.

    That is one reason why Microsoft encrypted the controller protocol on the 360. They claw back money on expensive accessories and didn't want any unlicensed hardware on the market.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  24. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by NatasRevol · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Not backwards compatible with Xbox 360 games?

    --
    There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
  25. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by BenSchuarmer · · Score: 2

    If you have an XBox 360, why go with something 359 releases out of date?

  26. Why are they so stingy with info? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    "Though Microsoft has yet to announce a specific launch date or price point for the system"

    Maybe I'm spoiled by Apple's style of announcements, but "shipping today" or "shipping by date X" and "price will be $Y" shouldn't be that hard to commit to, otherwise don't bother me with how great you're planning to make this wonderful new gadget. This announcement is premature. They should have done it in the fall or been bold enough to state a price now. Or just waited until E3 in the first place.

    More detailed specs at Engadget. It's an AMD Jaguar-based core with an integrated GPU (with on-die 32MB graphics as some kind of cache?), hence the huge number of transistors.

    It all sounds very nice, but until a price is stated it is impossible to assess whether it is a good deal, and I've seen nothing mentioned about the rumored "always connected" requirement, which would make it uninteresting to me at any price.

    1. Re:Why are they so stingy with info? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This is a game of chicken with sony. If one commits to a price, the other will either match it, or be lower. Can't have somebody stealing that thunder.

    2. Re:Why are they so stingy with info? by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      I totally agree, that's why I've ignored this and the PS4 "launches". As far as I can tell it's really more of an effort to poll people about what they like than any kind if real launch.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  27. Re:Does it have tv tunner? cable card? satellite T by BaronAaron · · Score: 1

    It's got HDMI-In and most likely an IR blaster to control your cable/sat box. Very similar to Google TV.

  28. It's freeaking me out by Immerial · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's always going to be on... you can walk into a room and say "Xbox, On." That means it's always going to be watching. It reports back what your watching ("See what your friends are watching."). They've increase the camera resolution enough that they can read your heart rate. Sorry... too freaky for me. It's like a LOTR Palantir... gonna have to cover it with a cloth. Or maybe another metaphor, like an Xbox Hal... me: "Xbox, Switch to Playstation 4" Xbox: "I'm sorry Dave, I can't let you do that."

    1. Re:It's freeaking me out by VortexCortex · · Score: 1

      It's always going to be on... you can walk into a room and say "Xbox, On." That means it's always going to be watching.

      No, that means it's always going to be "listening", and that your command is fucking redundant.

    2. Re:It's freeaking me out by Yosho · · Score: 1

      No, that means it's always going to be "listening", and that your command is fucking redundant.

      However, his point is that if it can listen to and process your voice, that means that even when the console is "off," the Kinect is receiving power and processing input. Are you sure the camera is really off?

      --
      Karma: Terrifying (mostly affected by atrocities you've committed)
    3. Re:It's freeaking me out by Hatta · · Score: 2

      Plug it into a power strip. Hit the master power switch on the strip when you turn off the console. I already do this for all my consoles (all 18 of them) anyway. Better to have them disconnected from main power during a lightning strike.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    4. Re:It's freeaking me out by MiniMike · · Score: 1

      Next up from Microsoft- a voice activated power strip.

      Oh, and of course you'll need to upgrade the power cord on all your appliances to use the new PowerPlug 2.0 form factor...

    5. Re:It's freeaking me out by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      The will implement a Windows style shutdown requirement to discourage this behaviour.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    6. Re:It's freeaking me out by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Why would I want my friends to see what I am watching? Choosing to tweet "omg game of thrones boobs lol" is one thing but I don't really want my friends to see every random thing I watch on YouTube.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    7. Re:It's freeaking me out by knarf · · Score: 1

      Better to have them disconnected from main power during a lightning strike.

      That small switch in the power strip is not going to protect your stuff from a real lightning hit as it would just jump the gap between the connectors - those switches are rated for 1500V. Pull the plug instead, or rig up something fancy to pull it for you - and replace it afterwards.

      --
      --frank[at]unternet.org
  29. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by MXPS · · Score: 2

    Nope, they switched to x86.

  30. Awesome! by ionymous · · Score: 1

    It seems like all the comments here are skeptical or negative.

    I've never owned an XBox, and I'm not a Microsoft fanboy, though I do own several Windows PC, but this sure sounds like an awesome piece of engineering.
    Nice job Microsoft?

    1. Re:Awesome! by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

      since the PlayStation is an even larger turn

      Are you saying the new playstation will be the PS 720?

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    2. Re:Awesome! by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1

      It seems like all the comments here are skeptical or negative.

      You must be new here. This is the home of the know-it-alls who piss on every new product announcement because they could have built better themselves (begging the question of why the fuck didn't they?). You wanna see what they said about the iPod when it first appeared!

      --
      Drill baby drill - on Mars
    3. Re:Awesome! by TheDarkMaster · · Score: 1

      This is because the console have features that only serve to hinder a user, such as the need for a always-on internet connection, the requirement to have an Live account, etc.

      --
      Religion: The greatest weapon of mass destruction of all time
  31. Schoolyard Rule by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Rather than one it seems like zero might have been a better choice.

    You may want to re-think that... use the old rule of imagining what taunts third-graders can make of your name, now think of "Zero" again in that light.

    One is way more Zen.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  32. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by NatasRevol · · Score: 2

    Maybe not a problem for the devs.

    Big problem for all the customers who are pissed they have to buy a new game CD.

    --
    There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
  33. Re:Does it work in other languages than English? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I prefer Japanese. No-one else around me can eavesdrop, it doesn't sound as dorky and it actually works better. In Japanese sounds don't run together nearly as much as in English and so the voice recognition is considerably more reliable. Plus Japanese sat-navs are super-polite.

    Having said that Google seem to have got English recognition more or less perfect now, even if you are Scottish.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  34. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by NatasRevol · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Always on, always listening.

    --
    There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
  35. XBoner by ilikenwf · · Score: 4, Funny

    Just considering that this will be abbreviated XBONE...so errors are XBONERS, and if you get an RROD, wouldn't that make you XBONED?

  36. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Xbox customers are extremely loyal, to the point of sycophancy. Of all the Xbox owners I know, zero of them have just bought one Xbox 360. After they got RROD'd, they ALL went out and bought another at full price. One of my friends is now on his 13th one.

    Plus there are legions of people who buy the special edition Xbox 360's, and just toss their old working one in a closet and forget about it or repurpose it for another room.

  37. Re:Does it work in other languages than English? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

    Replying to myself, lame I know...

    One other question came to mind after I hit submit. Does the XBOX do all the recognition itself, or is everything you (and every sound in the room) sent to Microsoft for decoding? If so how easy is it for interested parties to access that audio stream?

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  38. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Specs like this? You say that like they are good specs. Some cheap-ass 4 core hyperthreaded CPU so they can say it technically has 8, like the PS4, a paltry 8GB of RAM, obsolete Blu-Ray drive and an absolutely tiny 500GB hard drive (why 500GB? why not AT LEAST 1TB?).

    Nah. This thing will come out for $300-$400 and will be drastically underpowered compared to even a moderate range gaming PC, just like the PS4

  39. Re:cost and add on fee's by dadelbunts · · Score: 1

    You mean how they charge you for servers and infrastructure on all their games and services? You can always just play pc games and either pay for these things yourself or use free alternatives. Who needs the stellar clarity of xbl voice comm when you can have the lagfest that is mumble or roger wilco. Or you can always go to PSN and enjoy no online play for 2 months.

  40. How ya doin'.... by MiniMike · · Score: 4, Funny

    You can turn the console on by voice

    Do you need to have a really sexy voice?

    Does it matter if you're male/female or will it work both ways?

    If you fail to turn it on the first time, will you ever be able to turn it on in the future?

    I just really need to know these things before I even think about buying one.

  41. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by MXPS · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I agree. Porting the game might not be much of an issue but like you mentioned the consumer will have to re-purchase the game, which will be an issue for most.

  42. Re:Does it have tv tunner? cable card? satellite T by apcullen · · Score: 1

    Tuner. It's tuner you illiterate tool.

    Is there a +1 Troll mod?

  43. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by Carewolf · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Could be compatible with games for the xbox 1... I mean original xbox... Ugh. This is going to be a problem isn't it?

  44. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by P-niiice · · Score: 2

    Hm yes that rabid loyalty. They should have said 'fuck this console and every game I spent $60 on' and moved elsewhere and refused to spend that $199 to replace it. that would have showed M$.

  45. Marketing idea by wolfhead · · Score: 1

    Have the console in the middle of a mosh pit while Metallica plays "One"...

  46. I'm curious as to the decision by MXPS · · Score: 1

    go with DDR3 instead of GDDR5 like the PS4.

  47. Re:Does it have tv tunner? cable card? satellite T by alen · · Score: 1

    AT&T has done live tv streaming with no cable box for years. i've read verizon and time warner want to do the same thing instead of buying up new cable boxes.

    i bet this is all IP streaming for live TV content

  48. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by cayenne8 · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I'm curious how this thing will 'tune' in TV?

    Do they have deals with ATT UVerse, Cox/Charter/You Name it Cable channels, Dish/Direct TV Satellite companies to hook into their systems? That would actually be some coup if they were to be able to integrate into all these systems...will it also act as a DVR? I mean, if they want to be a 1 box fits all, that would be one big requirement I'd guess.

    Sure it can play games....but how well does it do the other stuff ?

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  49. "Do not want" features. by MachineShedFred · · Score: 3, Informative

    How about product-induced ADD?

    I don't want to have a fucking Skype session while I watch football, I want to watch football when I want to watch football. I don't want to give up valuable real estate to a fucking web browser when I'm watching a movie, I want to concentrate on the movie.

    In fact, I would contend that the director did a shitty job of making the movie if you can only half-way pay attention for a few minutes while cocking about on the Internet and not miss something.

    I don't want my saved games "in the cloud" where I can't access them if my ISP takes a shit. If you're going to put half a terabyte of disk in the thing, let me save a few 1MB save files on it. In fact, my Xbox360 is one of the few electronic things I can still use if my ISP takes a shit these days. They already tried this with "Games for Windows" a couple years back, and it was terrible. In Fallout 3, you could get into the game, and tell it to load the game before it completed your login to Live, and it would load a game from weeks ago if you were playing the DLC.

    I'll let others talk about the rest of it - I don't have any feelings one way or the other about other "features."

    --
    Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    1. Re:"Do not want" features. by TWiTfan · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but you can check in on your fantasy football league while you watch the Halo TV series!

      --
      The cow says "Moo." The dog says "Woof." The Timothy says "Thanks, valued customer. We appreciate your input."
    2. Re:"Do not want" features. by Reaperducer · · Score: 3, Funny

      I don't want to have a fucking Skype session while I watch football, I want to watch football when I want to watch football.

      You sound old.

      --
      -- I'm old enough to have lived through six different meanings of the word "hacker."
    3. Re:"Do not want" features. by Ash+Vince · · Score: 1

      I don't want my saved games "in the cloud" where I can't access them if my ISP takes a shit. If you're going to put half a terabyte of disk in the thing, let me save a few 1MB save files on it.

      I would hope that the savegames go in both places in a similar way to steam does it although steam seems to screw this up too often for my liking so I don't trust it 100% but if they made it always work it would be perfect. Steam tries to sync the save games to the cloud when you launch and exit a game. This enables me to play on both my gaming PC's (I have been hovering between my own pad and my girlfriends for years and they are a few hundred miles apart).

      That way if you have no internet then you can still play but only if you played last on that PC. I don't think it is only people like me who find this functionality useful, I reckon people who play games in internet cafe type places would find it useful too.

      --
      I dont read /. to RTFA, I read /. to offend people in ignorance.
    4. Re:"Do not want" features. by crispylinetta · · Score: 1

      God, quit being *such* a hacker.

  50. The problem is.... by apcullen · · Score: 1

    That SONY has a track record of removing useful features and adding less useful ones such as extra copy protection. So as far as a next gen console it's sort of a beggar's choice the consumer is left with.

    1. Re:The problem is.... by ZombieBraintrust · · Score: 1

      I forsee marketing speach about how microsoft is stuck in the past or moving backwards. Sony "we are not starting over" PS4

  51. Re:Does it work in other languages than English? by gstoddart · · Score: 1

    Having said that Google seem to have got English recognition more or less perfect now, even if you are Scottish.

    But probably not if you're Welsh ... that's one bear of an accent to try to follow when you hear it the first time. :-P

    I met some Welshmen on vacation one year, and while they all seemed nice, only one could I even begin to follow. The others were something of a mystery without an interpreter. ;-)

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  52. Backwards Compatible? by bogie · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Any news on if it can play Xbox 360 games? The thing is if MS drops 360 Xbox Live support the 360 becomes an expensive boat anchor. Everything on the 360 revolves around Live including your profiles, Important game patches, Video content like renting movies and HBO GO, etc.

    I guess I can live without being able to play 360 games on the One but then Microsoft HAS to keep Live going on the 360 for as long as people are willing to pay for Live service. People have a ton of money invested in these systems and If MS says "Sorry buy the new one and all new games" that would be a big Fuck You to all of us. There is definitely something to be said for old cartridge and cdrom based gaming systems that were pre-internet. They all work now and will all work 15 years from now. The 360 probably won't.

    --
    If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
    1. Re:Backwards Compatible? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Not compatible with old 360 games.

    2. Re:Backwards Compatible? by gman003 · · Score: 1

      Probably only through software emulation, if that. They didn't actually say any specs, but what they did say lines up with the leaked specs that gave it an x86 processor. Since the Xb360 was PowerPC-based, that would mean some sort of emulation would be a requirement, just like the compatibility of the Xb360 to the original Xbox.

      Ironically, they could now do near-perfect compatibility with the original Xbox, if anyone cared about it anymore.

    3. Re:Backwards Compatible? by CSHARP123 · · Score: 3, Informative

      No backward compatibility. You cannot play xbox360 games. More information is on Theverge http://www.theverge.com/2013/5/21/4350662/new-xbox-has-no-backwards-compatibilty

    4. Re:Backwards Compatible? by archshade · · Score: 1

      Any news on if it can play Xbox 360 games? The thing is if MS drops 360 Xbox Live support the 360 becomes an expensive boat anchor. Everything on the 360 revolves around Live including your profiles, Important game patches, Video content like renting movies and HBO GO, etc.

      The new Xbox One will mean EOL of the 360, I am yet to see a new console release not have caused a lack of (new) software for old models withn 6 months. If they keep XBL silver running for 12 or 18 months thats more than enough time for critical games updates (Also why is it now acceptable to release games before they are ready). The lack of online gaming and services sucks, but it's kind of expected and if you bought your 360 for the live feature in the beleif that the service was going to run in perpetuity, then you are a fool.

      --
      Most Damage is done by people who are AWAKE
    5. Re:Backwards Compatible? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      It will be very interesting to see how long MS keeps Live going for the 360 before cutting off all the games that people thought they bought but were actually just renting. Is anything less than "forever" acceptable?

      It will also be interesting to see if retro games are released for the XBOX One online service. Say you bought a classic NES game that was ported to the 360 and they release the same game for the One. Are you entitled to it for free? What about when they cut off Live for the 360 and you lose access to it? Will 360 games themselves become available this way? If you own Street Fighter 4 for the 360 will there be any kind of discount when they turn off the online matches and you need to buy the One version?

      The great game rental apocalypse is nearly upon us. Sony and Nintendo are equally guilty.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    6. Re:Backwards Compatible? by cbhacking · · Score: 1

      Eh... I've seen a lot of misinformation on this subject. Not saying that the core message (no back-compat for XB360 games) is wrong, but there's a lot of details out there which are.

      For example, the usual reason given - the switch from PPC to x86 - is invalid on the face of it; the 360 runs original Xbox games, which were written for x86 (it uses emulation to do this). Relatedly, the XB1 should be able (by that logic) to run OXB games (same architecture). There's also no legitimacy to the claim that indie arcade games won't run because of the architecture; those games are written using XNA (a variant of the .NET framework aimed at gaming) and compile to CIL, which will run on any architecture with the requisite JIT compiler (r interpreter, if you didn't mind it being very slow). For example, WP7 and ZuneHD games are also XNA games, but both devices run on the ARM architecture (although the WP7 "emulator" is actually an x86 VM and can load the same package files as the phone, so you can be damn sure that the code produced by the XNA compiler is architecture-agnostic). Ignore any idiots who claim that the ORX used the same architecture as the 360; that is flat-out wrong, and the difficulties in getting the emulator just right are why many OXB games didn't initially work quite right on the 360.

      Of course, the 360's CPU is not nearly as much less powerful than the XB1's CPU than the OXB's CPU is than the 360's. There may just not be room for emulation overhead in the difference between the 360 and the ONE. XNA and OSB games should still work, though...

      --
      There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
    7. Re:Backwards Compatible? by Xest · · Score: 1

      You don't need to be connected to Live to play games you bought on Live Arcade, the licenses are stored on your local system so even if they just shut down the live servers you could carry on playing.

      I agree with you about duplicate games on both systems though, I certainly wouldn't pay again for any live arcade titles I wanted on the other system, but then even if I did get an XBox One I'd keep my 360 anyway because of the lack of backwards compat.

    8. Re:Backwards Compatible? by Xest · · Score: 1

      But they'd have to actually create an emulator, something which when they did it on the 360 for the XBox One turned out to be quite a development and PR headache (as things didn't run quite as expected in the real world).

      Also, Microsoft has axed XNA, so I wouldn't count on XNA support being available on the new console.

    9. Re:Backwards Compatible? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Of course if your 360 needs repairing or replacing and you can't lot on to Live you are still screwed.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    10. Re:Backwards Compatible? by Xest · · Score: 1

      True, but I can't honestly say that any old hardware I have will last forever. I have plenty of old systems where I can no longer use the software regardless because the hardware has gone and the components required to fix are no longer available.

  53. HDMI-CEC by tepples · · Score: 1

    I'm curious how this thing will 'tune' in TV?

    It's probably HDMI-CEC with a fallback to an IR blaster.

    1. Re:HDMI-CEC by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      It has HDMI in and out. It will overlay what you have

      --
      Good-bye
    2. Re:HDMI-CEC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately HDMI-CEC isn't much of a 'standard' due to variances in manufacturer's interpretations of the 'standard' only the connection chains are robust there..

  54. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The EU decided to put politics ahead of science and wanted everyone to stop using lead in their electronics. (except for the military, of course)
    The early 360s were using lead free solder that wasn't fully tested. As you can guess, tin whiskers everywhere.
    What was interesting is the "voodoo" solution (wrap xbox in towels and leave running) to reflow the whiskers sometimes solved the problem.

  55. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by Black+Parrot · · Score: 4, Informative

    If you have an XBox 360, why go with something 359 releases out of date?

    Actually they use 8.491853096 bits to store the version number, so "One" is overflowese for "361".

    (3 quatloos for whoever spots the problem with that first.)

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  56. 40-nanometer? by edxwelch · · Score: 2

    The article says the SoC is 40-nanometer. Is that a mistake?

    1. Re:40-nanometer? by moeinvt · · Score: 2

      If they're dealing with AMD, I think they mean 45nm.

    2. Re:40-nanometer? by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      Well the article says their current chips are 90nm too which isn't true. IBM transitioned to 65nm back in 2007. This was one of the reasons Xbox 360 was able to go with the slim version.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    3. Re:40-nanometer? by edxwelch · · Score: 1

      As far as I know AMD don't make 40, or 45 nm parts anymore.

    4. Re:40-nanometer? by edxwelch · · Score: 1

      Actually, it is a mistake. They are using 28 nm. More details here: http://www.engadget.com/2013/05/21/xbox-one-hardware-and-specs/

    5. Re:40-nanometer? by slew · · Score: 1

      If they're dealing with AMD, I think they mean 45nm.

      As I recall, AMD started their march away from global foundaries and started using TSMC for their original Fusion chips at the 40nm bulk CMOS node and Microsoft has historically fabed at TSMC, so there's no reason to doubt that the XboxOne SOC is a 40nm chip fabbed at TSMC.

      Although the 28nm node is currently the most advanced process TSMC has in production, it is currently severely wafer start constrained (Qualcomm, AMD, Nvidia, are all big customers chewing up all spare capacity), so TSMC's "N-1" 40nm node is probably easier to ramp a product in if you need large production capacity by christmas and you don't care too much about die size... AFAIK, TSMC's 40nm node is just the "shrink" of their 45nm node, so their isn't any compelling reason to use 45nm for a new design unless you wanted to just have bigger chips with fewer chips on each wafer and more defects***

      ***you would typically only run a 45nm process if you had millions of dollars of chip reticles sitting around and you wanted to make a few more chips w/o making new reticles for 40nm..

  57. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by weszz · · Score: 1

    I bought 2 xboxes (returned one that died) and only bought one 360. granted I waited until the launch problems went away, but it's been good to me. it just need to be given enough space to spread it's heat out.

  58. Conference call with other fans by tepples · · Score: 1

    I don't want to have a fucking Skype session while I watch football, I want to watch football when I want to watch football.

    It's more fun to watch football with your friends. You could set up a conference call with other fans watching the same game.

    In fact, I would contend that the director did a shitty job of making the movie if you can only half-way pay attention for a few minutes while cocking about on the Internet and not miss something.

    That depends on how many people you have in your home.

  59. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1

    As someone else pointed out, the 360 is (was?) sold below manufacturing cost. If you buy a lot of systems and few games, you're damaging their bottom line. (Maybe that's why Sony didn't hesitate when they realised blocking Other OS on the PS3 would end the ability to build new clusters.)

    --
    Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
  60. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 4, Funny

    As a former Texas Instruments customer, I am deaf to your claims.

    --
    Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
  61. Offline multiplayer by tepples · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm firmly in the single-player, offline-only game-play camp

    So what you're saying is that you're prefer masturbation, over getting involved with other people

    There's the offline single-player camp. There's the online multiplayer camp. Do we already forget the offline multiplayer camp? I thought that was console games' one big advantage over PC games.

    1. Re:Offline multiplayer by komodo685 · · Score: 1

      Wait so... you prefer incest?

    2. Re:Offline multiplayer by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      I remember excellent four player gaming sessions on the couch with Warhawk ... I miss it sometimes.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    3. Re:Offline multiplayer by tepples · · Score: 1

      Does split-screen multiplayer work?

  62. Re:So... The One Box to rule them all by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

    One Tool to "do" them all, and in the darkness * them.

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  63. I'm the last person to support MSoft products by MugenEJ8 · · Score: 1

    ...but seriously, those of you who don't acknowledge how strong their presence is in the console industry are delusional.

    I remember seeing MechAssault and MotoGP online with Xbox Live on the original Xbox and was seriously impressed with how well the online setup was. This was back in the day of PS2s horrendous per-title networking functionality which was a disaster. Xbox 360 continued the trend, while Sony/Nintendo have only in recent years achieved what MSoft did back in 2002 with Live...

    Whether or not the Xbox One is successful is obviously in up for grabs, but I'm beyond excited about the prospect. The Xbox franchise has been the only MSoft division to get my hard earned money, and for good reasons... It's a great platform.

  64. Only two questions for me by Tridus · · Score: 1

    1. How much stuff is going to require paying for Xbox Live to work? I'm not keen on the current "pay Microsoft to gain the ability to pay Netflix to use Netflix" model that the 360 uses, and have very little interest in more of that. If the answer is that it's free once you buy the hardware, my interest goes up significantly.

    2. How many of the media features will work in Canada? Typically the answer is "very few". Maybe Microsoft can do better.

    --
    -- "So they told me that using the download page to download something was not something they anticipated." - Bill Gates
  65. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by Dogtanian · · Score: 2

    Could be compatible with games for the xbox 1... I mean original xbox... Ugh. This is going to be a problem isn't it?

    Though I doubt it's likely to be a major problem in the long term, I do agree that it's a somewhat strange and confusing name, especially as the "PSOne" was a cost-reduced version of the original PlayStation.

    When I scanned the headline, I briefly wondered whether this "XBox One" referred to a cost-reduced version of the existing console rather than the new model (though if I'd thought about it I'd have remembered that the current "XBox" isn't the first generation anyway, and MS aren't remotely likely to release a new version of the original XBox, no matter how cheap).

    Anyhow, Nintendo managed- by disregarding the issue and not changing it- to get people to forget how laughable a name "Wii" was, and still is when you think about it. So people will get used to this...

    --
    "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  66. Uhhhhhh . . . by Kimomaru · · Score: 1

    Not sure why I'm so underwhelmed. Specs are basically the same as PS3 but honestly if I cared at all about the upcoming Xbox, that feeling is gone now.

  67. eBay will soon require a picture for all items by tepples · · Score: 4, Informative

    Once the new console is released, I'll sell them on EBay as "XBox 1, slightly used, only $200".

    That won't work. As of this July, eBay requires all listings of used goods to come with a photo of the item taken by the buyer, and this photo must be at least 500 pixels long on the longer side. You won't be able to post a listing without a photo, and stock photos qualify only for brand-new items and for services. Sellers who don't already own a suitable camera can always buy one on eBay.

    1. Re:eBay will soon require a picture for all items by IsThisNickTaken · · Score: 1

      Just use a mirror (and turn the flash off) :)

    2. Re:eBay will soon require a picture for all items by Golddess · · Score: 1

      That won't work.

      I think there may be a few Nigerian Princes who would say otherwise. Even with a photo, I'm sure there would be a couple suckers.

      --
      "I'm not sure I like the fugnutish tone you used in your post!" -RogL (608926)-
    3. Re:eBay will soon require a picture for all items by Adrian+Lopez · · Score: 2

      Just use a mirror (and turn the flash off) :)

      And for God's sake put on some clothes!

      --
      "In prison you just have to shut your eyes and take it. Here you have to shut your eyes and give it."
    4. Re:eBay will soon require a picture for all items by gman003 · · Score: 1

      With appropriate lighting (or lack thereof) and some creatively poor camera work, it would be easy to make the Xbox Classic look like the Xbox One.

    5. Re:eBay will soon require a picture for all items by Tim12s · · Score: 1

      Someone sold an Xbox box for almost the retail price when the thing was originally released. They sold a BOX of an XBox.... XBox 1 is gonna sell like hotcakes.

    6. Re:eBay will soon require a picture for all items by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Sounds like the old "x box" scam will work though - keep the console and just sell the box it came in.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  68. Re:Will Need Major Support from TV Providers by Alkonaut · · Score: 1

    The interesting bit is how they plan to do the TV integration. They gave no clues in the presentation as far as I could see. I suppose in the US there are some large providers (Comcast, DirecTV and so on), but where I'm at I use an IP-tv provider that really stinks (I cannot even physically get cable or satellite to my home), and would switch instantly if Microsoft signed a deal with something half-decent in IPTV.

    Very interested to see them reveal what their "global" plan for TV/Entertainment is. A limited deal with one provider in the US (and a few select sports leagues in the US) would feel like a big meh on the rest of the planet.

  69. so much for used games by ndtechnologies · · Score: 1

    and MS charges you and extra fee, to play a used XBOX One game. So much for the "First Sale" doctrine.

    --
    I have nothing clever to put here...
  70. Re:Does it have tv tunner? cable card? satellite T by Black+Parrot · · Score: 2

    Tuner. It's tuner you illiterate tool.

    No, it's 'tuna'.

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  71. Re:Multitasking Irony. by Alkonaut · · Score: 1

    Let me set you straight: the multitasking is pretty much identical to the "modern" UI in Win8. You can snap one more thing to the side. Doesn't seem to be any more in the xbox, but not less either.

  72. Re:oh i see by timmyf2371 · · Score: 1

    For me, it's about the convenience and cost. I use a fairly high spec PC I built myself and refused to double the price by buying a top end graphics card, so I spent £100 on a 6870 instead.

    I got my XBox 360 in 2008 and paid £300 for it. (The mid-life RROD resulted in repair/replacement by Microsoft free of charge). To this day, that single unit still plays all the new games released for it. In five years time, will today's top end PC still play the newest games released for the PC?

    I'll probably buy the new XBox to play games, but like you I'm disappointed that saves will be in the cloud, particularly as it comes with a 500GB HDD. We saw with SIM City what can happen when this goes wrong, and its not like XBL has never had an outage either.

    Sure, I could get a better PC which would probably have better graphics - at least in the short term. But for gaming I prefer the convenience of the console, being able to fit it in my TV cabinet, and the knowledge that I can buy a game and it will just work.

    --

    Backup not found: (A)bort (R)etry (P)anic
  73. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by JDG1980 · · Score: 2

    I'm curious how this thing will 'tune' in TV? Do they have deals with ATT UVerse, Cox/Charter/You Name it Cable channels, Dish/Direct TV Satellite companies to hook into their systems?

    US cable companies are required to support the CableCard standard, so including that would cover all of them. They might still need to make individual deals with Uverse and the satellite providers, assuming they care about them. (I haven't looked up the stats, but I get the impression that mini-dish satellite TV isn't as popular as it once was. Probably because people have to pay the cable company for Internet access anyway, and figure it's easier to just use them for TV as well.)

  74. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by HermMunster · · Score: 1

    I don't know that I'd say they are loyal. With the 60% failure rate everyone should have abandoned them. That's an amazing failure rate.

    I believe what keeps people onboard is that they already had this major investment in games. It isn't as if they could take those games to another platform and play them. If you own an Xbox 360 and it fails you buy another because your games are worthless without one.

    With the potentiality of having the new version of the Xbox not play used games I would think that any loyalty factor would begin to go down. And, with the Kinect watching you (for the benefit of advertisers) I would conclude that as well.

    --
    You can lead a man with reason but you can't make him think.
  75. Re: I look forward to hearing about why this will by Tough+Love · · Score: 2

    IBM got righteously busted for tying in the 70's. I can't think of any reason why Microsoft should escape similar proceedings today.

    --
    When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
  76. My remaining questions by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    I RTFA (yes, yes I did) and the article only briefly but assuredly mentions that you will be able to play single-player games without the internet:

    (Donâ(TM)t worry; you can still play a single-player game without being connected to the Internet.)

    What else remains to be understood is how Azure game hosting will work in practice (who is paying, and for how long?) and of course, wtf privacy omg policy bbq etc.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  77. Games tied to your account and other EA wet dreams by SilenceBE · · Score: 1

    Microsoft did say that if a disc was used with a second account, that owner would be given the option to pay a fee and install the game from the disc, which would then mean that the new account would also own the game and could play it without the disc.

    and simcity like "features"

    Xbox One will give game developers the ability to create games that use Microsoft’s Azure cloud computing service, which means that they might be able to offload certain computing tasks to the cloud rather than process them on the Xbox One hardware itself. This would necessitate the game requiring a connection.

    http://www.wired.com/gamelife/2013/05/xbox-one-analysis/

  78. Re:Really? in 2013/4 by Alkonaut · · Score: 1

    You could have had a dual titan graphics card and 32Gb of ram of course. But the price point is fixed, so you can't. For a the cost of the 500Gb mechanical you can get a, what, 64GB solid state? A (low) cap on installed games feels like a larger problem than load times. The new box will come in several iterations over the coming years, and solid state will be one of the first things that will be added. Also, it is probably user replaceable if you are adventurous. I don't see it as a big problem. That said, we haven't seen the price tag yet, so the 500GB mechanical better mean that it is priced the same as the 360 was at launch then.

  79. So skip the console by PhxBlue · · Score: 1

    Go with PC. If you're going to pay hundreds of dollars for a rig that effectively has no used-game market, you may as well at least get better graphics and backward compatibility to show for it.

    --
    !#@%*)anks for hanging up the phone, dear.
  80. It won't serve my media entertainment needs by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

    It won't serve my media entertainment needs until it can play my existing files off my hard drive. MS, like Apple, is very, very bad at supporting anything other than their in-house flavor of video encoding. I've got a lot of TV and movies on my server, and they all play fine with Plex and XBMC. Will they be cataloged and available out of the box with an Xbox One?

    If so, count me in, but I'm not holding my breath.

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    1. Re:It won't serve my media entertainment needs by damnbunni · · Score: 1

      What I don't understand is why the Xbox 360 can't read NTFS formatted hard drives.

      I don't have any problem with the thing not reading my files - it likes the encoding I use - but to get it to read files over 4 gigabytes, I have to format the drive as Apple HFS+.

      Yes, that's correct. The Xbox 360 can read Apple HFS+, but not Microsoft NTFS.

  81. Any real info beyond press releases by Animats · · Score: 1

    Most of the articles about this are rehashes of the press release. They even use the same language. OK, there are 8 CPUs. But what kind?.

    The new Kinect supposedly is a real per-pixel time-of-flight device. Any more info on that?

  82. Not all saving is to the cloud. by tepples · · Score: 1
    From the Wired article:

    But other possibilities also come to mind. If developers are able to offload significant chunks of processing power to the cloud—conceivably even fundamental game mechanics like physics engines or collision-detection systems

    If the game mechanics run remotely, then it's essentially a glorified OnLive and will require always-on wired broadband. I thought people bought consoles in part because they live outside the service area of cable and fiber or just to have something to do during an Internet outage. Yet something later in the article contradicts that:

    (Don’t worry; you can still play a single-player game without being connected to the Internet.)

  83. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by Bigbutt · · Score: 1

    It's the same issue with smartphones. I have an iPhone. I haven't paid a lot for the apps I have, but I'd still have to rebuy them if I went with an Android even assuming the same apps were available.

    I've had my xbox360 since Dec 26, 2011 and had no problems even though I play Rocksmith for an hour or two just about every night and most weekends. I don't play any other games though (I do have Battlefield 2 and Doom 3 but have played both one time I think).

    [John]

    --
    Shit better not happen!
  84. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by default+luser · · Score: 1

    AMD doesn't make Hyperthreaded CPUs, so it will be either 4 or 8 cores.

    I am a bit hesitant to guess between Brazos versus Jaguar, GCN versus VILW-4, given the 40nm process used for the SoC. I also consider it a guarantee that their hardware is way under the PS4 given how light they are on the specifics - it screams of the Wii U!

    That said, I would not worry about the hard drive size. That will be increased in future revisions.

    --

    Man is the animal that laughs.
    And occasionally whores for Karma.

  85. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by archshade · · Score: 1

    How can you have slightly less than half a bit? surley there fundamental quanta. I think it must be 9 bits but with 151 reserved codes, The incrementer is designed to wrap around at this poit, any value greater than 360 shows an error condition.

    --
    Most Damage is done by people who are AWAKE
  86. Looks good by TheSkepticalOptimist · · Score: 1

    But I think they named it correctly, Xbox One (country)

    I am sure all this TV tie-in will fail miserably in Canada. They claim to do switching as fast as you can change the channel, realize in Canada on Roger's changing the channel takes 10 seconds because the stupid NextBox 2.0 box was designed for seniors that have to hunt and peck for numbers on their remote and will not allow fast key presses.

    Also I am sure that Rogers will refuse to allow the Xbox One to change channels through a "cloud" service because Roger's already has their own app for changing channels and viewing a guide, and Roger's can make ad revenue off their own app.

    And I am sure the NFL fantasy league features will only work for US customers. Will Canadians get NHL fantasy league?

    Its great that all these features were thought of and look nicely integrated, but will most likely never work properly outside of the US. Its tiresome when companies make a product that does not work properly outside the one market they designed it for.

    --
    I haven't thought of anything clever to put here, but then again most of you haven't either.
  87. Offline play depends on the game by tepples · · Score: 1

    Saved games in the cloud instead of locally saved?

    According to the Wired article, that'll depend on the game. It claims that "you can still play a single-player game without being connected to the Internet," but not all games will allow this: "developers are able to offload significant chunks of processing power to the cloud—conceivably even fundamental game mechanics like physics engines or collision-detection systems."

    1. Re:Offline play depends on the game by sexconker · · Score: 1

      "developers are able to offload significant chunks of processing power to the cloud—conceivably even fundamental game mechanics like physics engines or collision-detection systems."

      That's what EA/Maxis said about Sim City. It was horse shit then and it's horse shit now. Offloading shit to a remote server is not a viable option for a real-time video game.

  88. Max Headroom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Looks like Blipverts might be coming to an XBOX near you!

  89. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by Hadlock · · Score: 1

    This is basically a laptop without the expensive bits - i.e. the screen and battery. I would be surprised if the bill of materials exceeds $500 this time around. Technology has come a long ways in 7 years.

    --
    moox. for a new generation.
  90. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by MitchDev · · Score: 4, Informative

    Don't want an overpriced box that does everything. I want a game console that plays games and doesn't need the internet to "check in" with the home office...

  91. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by JDG1980 · · Score: 2

    This article confirms that both the CPU and GPU are based on AMD designs. Which means it will be an "8-core" CPU the same way the Bulldozer is 8-core: technically true if you only care about integer instructions, but it's more accurate to say there are four modules than eight cores.

    Reading between the lines, it sounds like the Xbox One SoC is basically a customized, jumbo-sized version of AMD's Trinity APU.

  92. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by Scarletdown · · Score: 2

    Yeah, I agree. Porting the game might not be much of an issue but like you mentioned the consumer will have to re-purchase the game, which will be an issue for most.

    The consumers (aka, the mindless bleating masses) may repurchase all of their games, but the customers, the ones who are able to make intelligent decisions instead of just blindly accepting everything their corporate overlords throw at them, would just hang on to their 360 consoles in order to play their 360 games, and only purchase new titles for this new system, if they decide they want it.

    Any word yet on if Microsoft is still going ahead with the plan to tie each purchased game to a single console, preventing a used games market from arising? If that happens, then the intelligent customers will avoid this console like the plague, and either go with the competition, or go without (aka, stay with their old systems and the huge library of games out there that can last them several lifetimes)?

    --
    This space unintentionally left blank.
  93. PC has its own exclusives by tepples · · Score: 1

    Some people also play games that get contractually written exclusive to the PC because none of the console makers are willing to sign the game's developer.

  94. Re:oh i see by Alkonaut · · Score: 1

    First of all they will probably sell it at zero or negative margin in the beginning meaning it may be a decent "gaming PC" for the money. Second, it has some hardware and software features that a PC doesn't, so it can probably squeeze out a bit more performance from the same dollar, than a computer running a desktop OS does. Developers also have a fixed hardware target so they can cut corners and do optimizations that aren't possible in PC games. Lastly, even though it has been theoretically possible to e.g. play a game of FIFA with 3 friends on a PC on your big screen TV, it is just so much simpler to do so on a console.

  95. Does anyone else... by frootcakeuk · · Score: 1

    .. think that is an awful name for a 3rd gen anything? Also; "from 15,000 to 300,000 servers". Is that a typo or have they really increased their server capacity 20-fold?

    --
    Remember kids: What's right isn't as important as what's profitable.
    1. Re:Does anyone else... by bussdriver · · Score: 1

      In other news, Microsoft found a way to turn all those unsold Zune and windows phones into "environmentally friendly" servers.

  96. If this is Xbox 1 by moeinvt · · Score: 1

    ... what was the Xbox before Xbox 2?

    What's the next number in the sequence

    1, 2, 360, 1 ... ?

    1. Re:If this is Xbox 1 by ZombieBraintrust · · Score: 1

      There was no Xbox 2... sequence was XBox, XBox 360, XBox One
      null, 360, 1

    2. Re:If this is Xbox 1 by TWiTfan · · Score: 1

      It's a reboot of the series.

      --
      The cow says "Moo." The dog says "Woof." The Timothy says "Thanks, valued customer. We appreciate your input."
  97. Sony Losing Money on Every Console: False by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    The idea that Sony lost money on every console ever made is false. After all, Sony is a hardware company.

    The PS3 may have lost money on initial units sold. The PS1 and PS2 did not.

    1. Re:Sony Losing Money on Every Console: False by ildon · · Score: 1

      You missed the key phrase: "until well into their lifecycles." He did not say: "every console ever made."

      PS2 definitely sold at a loss for its first few years. I don't know about the PS1.

    2. Re:Sony Losing Money on Every Console: False by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      Its called a loss leader ... its a common and very workable technique in marketing, and more so when you're a hardware company who knows how to whittle down production costs with time.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
  98. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by Golddess · · Score: 1

    Anyhow, Nintendo managed- by disregarding the issue and not changing it- to get people to forget how laughable a name "Wii" was, and still is when you think about it.

    Except Xbox One isn't laughable, it's just (possibly) confusing. Perhaps a better example is nVidia and their transition from 6X00, 7X00, 8X00, down to 2X0, 3X0, 4X0, etc.

    --
    "I'm not sure I like the fugnutish tone you used in your post!" -RogL (608926)-
  99. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by VortexCortex · · Score: 1

    Increment Overflow Not resulting in Zero? There would have to be a whole other Docto--er, Console, that we didn't know about.

  100. Offline multiplayer in PC games by tepples · · Score: 1

    How many PC games support offline multiplayer nowadays? I have three USB game controllers, and they all work in emulated games and those few games made for the PC that support multiple controllers. But too many games made for the PC are coded under the assumption that each player will have his own PC, as opposed to a single PC connected to the TV.

    1. Re:Offline multiplayer in PC games by PhxBlue · · Score: 1

      Fair point. I didn't consider offline multiplayer, because I tend to play games to get away from people. :) I think the Lego games are pretty good about offline multiplayer, though. There're probably others out there as well.

      --
      !#@%*)anks for hanging up the phone, dear.
  101. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by TWiTfan · · Score: 2

    Unless it has a couple of Cablecard slots on back, I don't see how that's going to work either. If it's going to be some kludgey IR blaster setup, then forget it. And my cableco's cable boxes don't have any other interface that I'm aware of.

    --
    The cow says "Moo." The dog says "Woof." The Timothy says "Thanks, valued customer. We appreciate your input."
  102. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1

    Your signature has more to do with this than you might think; Xbox gamers are deeply entrenched in their niche. The loyalty factor in this case could probably power a small nuclear reactor.

    --
    Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
  103. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by frootcakeuk · · Score: 2

    I just did a google image search for "xbox one". Only 1 (lol) image of the new xbox shows up, all the rest are 1st gen Xbox's.

    https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=xbox+one&btnG=Search&oe=utf-8&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&client=firefox-a&um=1&hl=en&tbm=isch&tab=wi

    I'm in the UK, is this the same case for elsewhere in the world?

    --
    Remember kids: What's right isn't as important as what's profitable.
  104. Re:Ok, great! by JDG1980 · · Score: 2

    But can it play Crysis?

    Yes, rhetorical question, I know.

    But taking it seriously... The new Xbox GPU is said to be similar to the Radeon 7790. And according to Anandtech, that card can indeed handle Crysis in full HD at more modest settings at playable frame rates (though not a full 60 fps).

    That said... who cares? Crysis is basically a benchmark masquerading as a game. It's amazing how much publicity Crytek got by hiring programmers who don't know how to optimize.

  105. Bulldozer is almost SMT by tepples · · Score: 1

    AMD doesn't make Hyperthreaded CPUs

    Bulldozer is SMT with each of two threads given its own integer pipe.

    I am a bit hesitant to guess between Brazos versus Jaguar, GCN versus VILW-4

    That's strange: There was already a console called the "Jaguar" (made by Atari), one called the "GCN" (abbreviation for GameCube, made by Nintendo), and one called the "Xbox 1" (the original Xbox, made by Microsoft, gained this name after the 360 came out).

  106. Multi-tasking in windows (on x86) s novel? by archshade · · Score: 2

    “Snapping in” is the Xbox One’s task-switching mechanism, and it’s made possible by some serious operating system kung fu.

    WTF, this thing has a an x86 core and is running a modified version of MS Windows, how much effort did they put into multitasking. If they really did put this much effort into it isn't this a bit of wheel re-invention, or maybe they have a better scheduler than in desktop Windows. If the systems is better than standard Windows why is it not being pushed into there main OS.

    I may well get one of these, I always liked my XBOXes (original and 360, never had one break). It really depends on whether the always on internet requirment is actually a requirment. I never connected my xbox to the net, and infreaquantly connected my 360. When I want to play games I like to be able to grab a beer and play by myself (I never really enjoyed online gaming) or even better get some mates round get more beer and play games on a big TV, oh and pizza don't forget pizza.

    Although I won't be buying this when its brand new, I let some kinks get ironed out and the price drop a bit.

    --
    Most Damage is done by people who are AWAKE
    1. Re:Multi-tasking in windows (on x86) s novel? by ildon · · Score: 1

      It's running 3 VMs over a hypervisor. One is basically Windows 8 and does the apps and TV and movies and shit, the other is the Xbox OS which runs the games, and the third is a video compositor so you can seamlessly transition between them and have the little side pop-up things. It literally is running 3 OS instances at any given time.

    2. Re:Multi-tasking in windows (on x86) s novel? by archshade · · Score: 1

      It's running 3 VMs over a hypervisor. One is basically Windows 8 and does the apps and TV and movies and shit, the other is the Xbox OS which runs the games, and the third is a video compositor so you can seamlessly transition between them and have the little side pop-up things. It literally is running 3 OS instances at any given time.

      OK, that does sound more impressive than the what the quote said, I did not really RTFA (this is /.), just kinda skimmed it. Although what is the advantage of this setup over a single OS with good task scheduling? Is the XBOX OS so radically diffrent to the rest of the system it need a totally independent OS? Is this a way to sandbox the game console from the media centre, possible to ensure MS lockdown of the console while still allowing the media centre to work more like a traditionol computer? It seems like an over engineered system that brings in overhead. Could some one fill me in on the benefit of this, I accept my understanding of OS design is somewhat lacking.

      --
      Most Damage is done by people who are AWAKE
  107. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by TWiTfan · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Xbox customers are extremely loyal, to the point of sycophancy.

    Not this one. I've been an Xbox owner since the Xbox 1. But I've grown tired of having to pay $50/year for basic stuff like using the Netflix and Hulu apps. I'm also sick of the ad-heavy new home UI, the shitty new Netflix UI, and the fact that MS has spent years dropping all their best first-party developers.

    I was vastly underwhelmed by today's unveiling (seriously, a Halo TV show, wtf?!?!?). The fact that the didn't even address the "always on" requirement for single-player titles rumors tells me all I need to know. Combine that with a bunch of "cloud" shit, no interesting exclusives, a new cable interface that probably won't even work with my cable system, and hardware that's no better than the PS4--and it all adds up to a great big cup of who-gives-a-fuck.

    This Xbox fanboy is probably going PS4 this time around. At least it will save me $50 a year.

    --
    The cow says "Moo." The dog says "Woof." The Timothy says "Thanks, valued customer. We appreciate your input."
  108. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by TWiTfan · · Score: 1

    Always on, always listening.

    When I saw that part of the presentation, I laughed. The first thing I would do if I had one of these would be to turn that stupid voice feature off. It's going to be turning on every time I used the word "on" in a conversation.

    --
    The cow says "Moo." The dog says "Woof." The Timothy says "Thanks, valued customer. We appreciate your input."
  109. Backward compatibile by Frankie70 · · Score: 1

    Why do games need to be backward compatible. It's not as if you will throw away your XBox360 when you buy an XBox One.

    1. Re:Backward compatibile by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      Because most people put more money into buying games than buying consoles.

      Why not sell your old console to put money towards the new console?

      Oh, because all those discs you have lying around would be worthless.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    2. Re:Backward compatibile by Cinder6 · · Score: 1

      Because the new console can often improve the visuals or load times of the old games. The original PS3 upscaled everything to 1080p, which was nice. Also, it let you create unlimited virtual memory cards, which was a godsend after coming from the PS2. Finally, having backwards compatibility means one less thing that needs to be hooked up all the time.

      --
      If you can't convince them, convict them.
    3. Re:Backward compatibile by Somebody+Is+Using+My · · Score: 1

      I'm just hoping that - a few years from now - desktop PCs will be powerful enough to emulate the PS3/XBox360. They've already done amazing things with older consoles (Playstation 1 and 2, Nintendo 64, Genesis, etc).

      That way I only need the current console versions hooked up to the TV for new games, and the PC for my back catalog.

      I'm amazed at how well my five year old PC plays PS2 games.

    4. Re:Backward compatibile by sixoseven · · Score: 1

      You know, we had this same discussion when the XBox 360 first appeared. Then they added cheaper games, the Arcade series, back when everyone was complaining about 'who wants to play 60 dollar titles?'. And then over time, more and more games became backwards compatible, and you know what? They turned out to be boring - like watching SD 4:3 programs in an HD 16:9 world.

      Then a couple years ago, critics were bemoaning the end of the video game industry. Wall Street just couldn't figure out the economics, and they were saying that there's nothing new under the sun, and that if gaming didn't go 3D there would be no future.

      The fact of the matter is that game developers and studios keep improving and they have yet to plateau. The industry *is* moving forward and it *is* getting better. Unlike, say, smartphones.

      --
      fault-tolerant
    5. Re:Backward compatibile by ZombieBraintrust · · Score: 1

      People were planning to trade in their XBox360 for credit towards and XBox One. For many types of games it won't matter. Most single player games you finish and then sell anyways. It will matter for games you can put hundreds of hours into.(RPGs, Sports, Shooters) It will matter for music games where purchase music tracts.(Rockband, Rocksmith, Just Dance) It will mater for games where you create things.(Minecraft, Little Big Planet)

    6. Re:Backward compatibile by hobarrera · · Score: 1

      Because people don't want to have 2 console, 8 controllers, and a huge amount of cables next to their tv, instead of half that.

    7. Re:Backward compatibile by Grieviant · · Score: 1

      Why do games need to be backward compatible. It's not as if you will throw away your XBox360 when you buy an XBox One.

      Because it's a pain in the ass to have to keep the old console hooked up / get it out of the closet for those occasions when you want to play an old game.

    8. Re:Backward compatibile by Stuarticus · · Score: 1

      But with the MTBF of Xboxen you will be throwing it out within six months.

      --
      If you think someone isn't free to have a different definition of "freedom" you may be a tyrant.
  110. HTC called... by theendlessnow · · Score: 1

    They want their ONE back...

  111. Re:Ok, great! by synapse7 · · Score: 1

    Can it play Crysis 3, is the current question.

  112. What new name for Xbox Live Gold? by tepples · · Score: 1

    I personally thought "Xbox Live" would have been a great name, but they've been ditching the Live branding, so I knew that wouldn't happen either.

    If Microsoft is ditching the "Xbox Live" branding, then what's the new name for the additional recurring fee payable to Microsoft to access the Netflix VOD subscription that you're already paying for?

    1. Re:What new name for Xbox Live Gold? by Megane · · Score: 1

      Why are you asking me? I don't have one of those stupid things. (Nor do I have PS3. Living room PC FTW, and MythTV PC soon. Also, antenna and no streaming.) I had read somewhere a few months ago that they were backing down from that branding. Doesn't mean what I read was true, of course.

      Still, I think it would have been a decent name for the new box itself over "XBone".

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  113. Re:Games tied to your account and other EA wet dre by VortexCortex · · Score: 1

    Microsoft did say that if a disc was used with a second account, that owner would be given the option to pay a fee and install the game from the disc, which would then mean that the new account would also own the game and could play it without the disc.

    That means I'll have to pay twice to play the ONE fucking game I bought. No. They had a chance to fix this shit, not buying it until they do.

    I have two xboxes, but have to have two different accounts because it won't let folks watch netflix in one room while I play games in the other. I bought Bullet Storm -- My first encounter with Online Pass. My brother was visiting, he popped the game in while I went on a beer run. Got back, he started making pizza while went to go play... They wanted $10 more to play the damn game I just bought because my bro already used the online pass. We talked about what the fuck just happened, he thought that the code was just something in the box to prove you had it -- Like the codes in the manual of X-Com, back in the day. You could lend the game and the manual to a friend, but you needed the manual to put in the code and play... Nope, it was single use code. We ate pizza, went to gamestop to return the broken game. It had been opened so the best they could do was store credit for a used game trade-in... It was busy. About 20 people in the store. I stood in the middle of the store, held the disk above my head and said: "Listen Up Folks! This is a brand new game, bought two hours ago. They want 50% off because it's a Game With a Single Use Codes. They want $10 more for each account / game player in your house even though only one of them can play it at a time. I snapped the disk in half. Gave the finger to the clerk and told her, "This finger is only partially for you. It's also for the assholes who gave you the crap you just sold me. You deserve it because you sold me useless broken crap, instead of warning me of the defects, like a sleazy used car salesman would."

    Let me know when the consoles have games that are DRM free. Till then, they can all go fuck right off.

  114. Re:I personally play games for enjoyment by gstoddart · · Score: 1

    I play them for enjoyment too, but that doesn't include the ability for game companies to put ads into my games and track everything I do with them.

    An always-on internet wouldn't enhance my enjoyment, just the amount of crap I need to put up with.

    I like my Xbox, and my wife plays several games with the Kinect -- but as soon as they put ads into the home page and the games, my Xbox was summarily disconnected from the network, and will remain that way.

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  115. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

    If you turn off the voice activation, does that turn off the microphone?

    --
    There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
  116. Xbox, pekingese, near a bear, manatee by tepples · · Score: 1

    Better yet, watch One-Winged Angel set your Xbox One to Mandarin: "Xbox, pekingese, near a bear, manatee, SEPHIROTH".

  117. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by parlancex · · Score: 1

    By using arithmetic or range encoding.

  118. Konami presents DDR 3 by tepples · · Score: 1

    Probably liked Captain Jack better than We Drink Ritalin.

  119. Xbox One by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    One for the Dark Lord on his dark throne
    In the Land of Mordor where the Shadows lie.
    One Xbox to rule them all, One Xbox to find them,
    One Xbox to bring them all and in the darkness bind them
    In the Land of Mordor where the Shadows lie.

    Was going to post that in primary thread as it was first thought to come to mind about the name. Then I saw you preempted my LOTR, so I will post under you in deference to your Palantir Cloud of intrusiveness...

  120. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by HaZardman27 · · Score: 1

    And despite that, it will likely let developers work closer to the metal than is possible on a PC, still eliminating much of the overhead of running games on a PC OS. And like I said before, the total memory footprint of that additional software is still likely far smaller than that of a modern desktop OS. You've only managed to (attempt to) dispute one of my three arguments. So nope, you're still the stupid one.

    --
    Apparently wizard is not a legitimate career path, so I chose programmer instead.
  121. PC does have some DRM-free games by tepples · · Score: 1

    Some PC games have DRM, but then again some console games (such as one of the Spyro games for PS1) have additional copy protection above and beyond the console's proprietary disc format. But the vast majority of PC games on GOG or Humble Bundle are DRM-free, as are open-source games downloaded from the developer's own web site.

    Or were you referring to Secure Boot in Windows 8 (x86 and x86-64)? You can turn that off.

    1. Re:PC does have some DRM-free games by EvanED · · Score: 1

      But the vast majority of PC games on GOG or Humble Bundle are DRM-free, as are open-source games downloaded from the developer's own web site.

      And what percentage of PC games that most people would want to play are available on GOG, a Humble Bundle, or as an open-source game on the developer's web site?

      Many of the best games out there (including my favorite, Portal, and many of my other top games) are not available in any of those sources. I am happy that DRM-free indie games seem to be gaining popularity, but there's still a long way to go. Even some great indie games, like Mark of the Ninja (I think), are only available on Steam.

    2. Re:PC does have some DRM-free games by tepples · · Score: 1

      PC games that most people would want to play

      I guess our disagreement hinges on what you're trying to imply through this phrase.

      Is there any single game played by "most people", or even just more than 50% of PC gamers? The only video games I can think of that come even remotely close to having played by "most people" are Solitaire, Minesweeper, The Sims, and Tetris. True, there are huge hits such as Half-Life series, but what percent of all PC gamers have played, say, Half-Life 2? The direction in which I take this line of discussion depends on what fraction of the total audience a particular game needs before it's considered successful.

      Or do you claim that someone is likely to browse through GOG and see absolutely no worthwhile games?

    3. Re:PC does have some DRM-free games by EvanED · · Score: 1

      Or do you claim that someone is likely to browse through GOG and see absolutely no worthwhile games?

      Absolutely not.

      What I mean is the following: if you were to ask everyone who plays PC games (maybe exclude the guy who just dabbles in solitaire in his spare time) what their favorites are and what games they haven't played that they would most like to, I strongly suspect that almost all of those lists will have games that are only available with DRM.

      It doesn't have to be the same game between different people: maybe I put Portal on my list, you put HL2 on your list, someone else puts Mass Effect on their list. But there will be very few lists consisting entirely of games available DRM-free.

      Sticking to DRM-free games will cause you to miss out on a ton of good stuff. If it's a strong principle to avoid DRM then it's worth it, but for most people that's not the case.

    4. Re:PC does have some DRM-free games by EvanED · · Score: 1

      The direction in which I take this line of discussion depends on what fraction of the total audience a particular game needs before it's considered successful.

      Also, I don't really care what the answer to this question is. I'm not looking at things from the point of view of the game developer and trying to argue that it makes sense for publishers to include DRM or not include DRM or whatever; I'm looking at things from the point of view of the gamer, who has to decide between supporting DRM-ed products or going without games they probably want.

  122. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by dogbert_2001 · · Score: 1

    It's a compass heading.
    Instead of going north, they're now going north north north north north north north east.

  123. Just keep telling yourself you understand CPU arch by default+luser · · Score: 5, Informative

    AMD doesn't make Hyperthreaded(tm) CPUs, but they use a very similar technique for duplicating core components. Don't be so dense.

    Bulldozer module is NOTHING like hyperthreading.

    Hyperthreading duplicates/shares key registers, cache entries and TLBs in order to execute instructions from TWO THREADS on the same processor core. The EXECUTE and DECODE are typically much wider to allow two threads to fully-utilize all the execution resources of a single core. Software must be written specifically to take advantage of this feature (separate threads for FPU and ALU ops, and go easy on the thread locking), or you'll see zero, or possibly NEGATIVE improvement. Best-case scaling throughput (Nehalem) is 20-30%.

    Bulldozer modules are two COMPLETELY INDEPENDENTLY OPERATING cores that share decoders and an FPU unit. The decoders are tasked depending on how many cores in the module are loaded, and the FPUs just have a shared reservation station available to both processors (assumes that most loads are integer-heavy). Neither processor can execute instructions from another thread, and the best-case scaling is much higher than Hyperthreading (typically 70-80%).

    Also, Bullozer will be losing one of it's major disadvantages when Steamroller launches: the decoders will be 4-wide for each module, and run independently, which is expected to allow scaling to 90-95% in integer-heavy loads.

      As you can see, there is NOTHING in common between the two designs. The Bulldozer approach reduces the size of the core in favor of putting more cores on a die. The Intel Hyperthreading approach is to make a much wider core, and get more efficient use of those execution units. The only thing they have in common is that they both can theoretically improve multithreaded performance.

    --

    Man is the animal that laughs.
    And occasionally whores for Karma.

  124. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by muon-catalyzed · · Score: 1

    Not backwards compatible. The problem is that the old Xbox 360 has IBM Power inside while this new one is gonna get AMD64. The new CPU will probably not be that much faster, but the GPU should be plenty fast.

  125. Re:Does it have tv tunner? cable card? satellite T by TWiTfan · · Score: 1

    My mother was a tool, you insensitive clod!

    --
    The cow says "Moo." The dog says "Woof." The Timothy says "Thanks, valued customer. We appreciate your input."
  126. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by clarkn0va · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Also interesting is the fact that the entire world of computing outside of the XBOX 360 was able to adapt to the Pb-free initiative without all the drama and years of failed hardware.

    --
    I am literally 3000 tokens away from the chaotic crossbow --Stephen
  127. Is it too much by Libertarian001 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    to ask for a classic-style game console built with modern tech/processing power?

    Yes, I'd like to be able to play online with friends. That is the only other thing that I really want out of my console. I don't care if plays music or movies. I don't want it to be the center of my entertainment center. I sure as hell don't want it always on and spying on me.

    I just want to play games, and that includes used ones.

    1. Re:Is it too much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You described a Wii U.

    2. Re:Is it too much by Libertarian001 · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't consider the Wii U to be modern processing power.

    3. Re:Is it too much by bloodhawk · · Score: 1

      In this day and age, yes it probably is too much to ask. In order to get the sales numbers needed to support a major console you have to appeal to a much larger audience than in the past. Extending the console beyond gaming is a way to achieve the volumes needed or you could go the way of Nintendo and just release low end tech.

    4. Re:Is it too much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's modern. It's just aimed at a different point in the performance vs. power consumption (and cost) curve.

      Eh, okay, maybe the CPU really is based on a relatively ancient architecture. But the rest is modernish.

      But aside from the CPU, I give Nintendo kudos for daring to say that you don't have to have the hottest, most cutting-edge tech to be innovative. They are pursuing new game play ideas more so than Sony or Microsoft, who mostly are trying to incorporate "social" and "cloud" elements into gaming (which are not bad things, but probably don't affect actual game play as much as Nintendo's attempts).

      Hmm, attempt at a concise post ruined by unstoppable trains of thought.

    5. Re:Is it too much by aztektum · · Score: 1

      It's called a PC. It has all the same capabilities as this thing, and you can play games going back decades. Enjoy.

      --
      :: aztek ::
      No sig for you!!
    6. Re:Is it too much by Ash+Vince · · Score: 1

      to ask for a classic-style game console built with modern tech/processing power?

      Yes, I'd like to be able to play online with friends. That is the only other thing that I really want out of my console. I don't care if plays music or movies. I don't want it to be the center of my entertainment center. I sure as hell don't want it always on and spying on me.

      I just want to play games, and that includes used ones.

      As to music and movies you must realise that if they did not build in a blueray player then the vast majority of people would have opted for the PS4 or whatever it will be called (myself included as I don't have a blueray player yet). Also, Bluray drives are so cheap now there is almost no point in using a DVD drive instead. You are very much in the minority if you do not use a games console for watching any sort of movies or other multimedia so betting on everyone being like you would be a sure fire recipe for MS going bankrupt.

      As to used games I doubt any of the companies that create games want you you to be able to do this, so they have been lobbying to make sure this is not possible. There will never be another console that supports this unless they can come up with a cast iron DRM system that ensures the same licence can be used on two different machines at the same time, this would probably require an always on internet connection.

      Personally I get annoyed by games on my old Xbox360 making get up off the couch to swap disks when both games are installed on the hard disk just so they can be sure I have not sold one of them to a second hand shop (something I would never do as the second hand or trade in cost of a game is a pittance and I buy everything off the web). If they can use an always on internet connection to ensure that two copies of the same game are not being played at once that might fix this and let me stay on the couch but I bet a crap load of other people here would go mental at such an idea so the it is very likely that second hand games will be blocked.

      The only way to keep everybody happy in this regard would be to trust their customers to not pirate stuff and the chances of that happening are somewhere between slim and none since the existence of any software piracy whatsoever proves that some people cannot be trusted. This is not saying that piracy costs them a sale, just that people who produce games don't want it to happen even if it doesn't.

      Actually I just checked and it seems you will have to pay an additional fee to play a second hand game so you might be able to buy a second hand disk but the licence to use it's contents will be extra and always on internet will be down to the games developers. Seems like they are ignoring no-money cheapskate gypos like you to make it easier for me to stay on the couch, good move MS!

      --
      I dont read /. to RTFA, I read /. to offend people in ignorance.
    7. Re:Is it too much by Libertarian001 · · Score: 1

      You know, I have never once seen someone use a game console for watching movies.

      The rest of your comment was just trollish. Kindly go fuck yourself.

    8. Re:Is it too much by Libertarian001 · · Score: 1

      You mean the new XBox is a PC? Yes, yes it is. It's just more limited.

    9. Re:Is it too much by Ash+Vince · · Score: 1

      You know, I have never once seen someone use a game console for watching movies.

      Have you read this thread? There are tons of people talking about want Netflix to work without paying for an Xbox Live subscription, they are not using their console just for gaming are they?

      --
      I dont read /. to RTFA, I read /. to offend people in ignorance.
  128. Re:oh i see by Gadget_Guy · · Score: 1

    In five years time, will today's top end PC still play the newest games released for the PC?

    Yes. It won't play them at maximum settings, but on mainstream display settings the games will run fine. My cheap gaming PC from about the same era as your XBox 360 still plays everything that I throw at it.

  129. Re:Hahahaha by TWiTfan · · Score: 2

    At least with the PS4, I won't have to pay $50/year just to watch Netflix. Much as I hate Sony and used to love Xbox, I've had enough of that. None for this coming generation, thanks.

    --
    The cow says "Moo." The dog says "Woof." The Timothy says "Thanks, valued customer. We appreciate your input."
  130. Re:People can moan by VortexCortex · · Score: 2

    God you people have no life, who gives a shit if it's Xbox 3.14 or Zero or who-gives-a-crap?

    Buy it or don't. Idiots.

    Boycotting doesn't work. It feels good from a moral standpoint, that your money isn't going to support DRM shit that makes each player in your household pay additional fees to play the one game disk you bought... However, Boycotts don't work. What if you heard the ending of ME3 sucked, and just didn't buy it? That wouldn't change anything. Bitch about it online enough such that it causes a horrible PR debacle and guess what happens? Shit. Shit actually happens. All you have to do is get enough people bitching about something and something will happen.

    What if folks had just unfollowed the MS guy who was saying dumb shit about how "always-on" is great and being a general ass? Nothing. Bitch about it enough, guess what happens? Fucker is GONE. That's right. Bitching made it happen. You're the idiot if you think moaning about shit is pointless.

  131. Re:Really? in 2013/4 by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

    Sure the enthusiast PC magazines go gaga over SSD's, but I consider to be a "splurge" item. I'd take more capacity over speed any day of the week and twice on Sundays. The money one spends on an SSD could be used for a bigger mechanical drive AND a faster CPU, AND a nicer GPU AND More RAM.

  132. Thanks for pretending you understand CPU/GPUs by default+luser · · Score: 1

    That's strange: There was already a console called the "Jaguar" (made by Atari), one called the "GCN" (abbreviation for GameCube, made by Nintendo), and one called the "Xbox 1" (the original Xbox, made by Microsoft, gained this name after the 360 came out)

    If you actually PAID ATTENTION to the marketplace, you would understand these acronyms:

    Brazos = AMD's current low-power CPU architecture. Used in their APUs. Built on 40nm process.

    Jaguar = AMD's next-generation low-power CPU architecture. Built on 28nm process. Confirmed for PS4.

    GCN = Graphics Core Next = AMD's latest graphics architecture. Built only on the 28nm process. This is confirmed in the PS4.

    VLIW-4 is AMD's previous graphics revision, used in the HD 6900 series. This was last built on 40nm process.

    The product launch is confusing because the SoC AMD is building for Microsoft is based upon the older 40nm process. Given the lack of specifics, the 40nm process technology IMPLIES the product could use older technology (Brazos, VLIW-4). So I was simply stating my uncertainty.

    --

    Man is the animal that laughs.
    And occasionally whores for Karma.

  133. Features already on standard living room hardware by ravenscar · · Score: 1

    Other than the gaming functionality, everything else they seem to offer is already part of my living room hardware. I can watch Netflix, Hulu, Crackle, etc. on my Smart TV, my Blu-ray player, and my PS3. Oh, and I don't have to pay for Xbox Live to do any of those things either. All three can also connect to my home media server via DLNA and/or Medialink (Plex). It seems that this functionality is standard on almost any electronic device you place in your living room these days. I think I paid around $100 for my blu-ray player (with built-in wifi).

    Sure, there are other features like Connect and voice command, but I find those mostly silly and useless. They are features in which I have zero interest. I'm sure some others feel differently.

    In that case, it comes down to gaming. My PC (with Steam) handles that beautifully - probably better than will the Xbox One. I'll admit, though, that it isn't in my living room. I guess I could see getting this for my kids to replace their 360, but not at the day-one price point at which it will likely be introduced. I'll wait to see if it ends up being as problematic as the 360 and, if not, may pick one up when it hits $199. If not, I'll give the kids my PS3 when their 360 dies for the 4th time.

  134. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by Seumas · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yes, according to the live stream on GiantBomb, Microsoft's console will implement a "used fee". When you play a game, you will have to install it completely to the hard drive and it will be locked to that user account. If you want someone else to play it, they will have to pay a fee of an unknown amount.

    This now only fucks over the used market, but fucks over people lending games to their friends... worse, even their most loyal customers. If you pre-order games for full price so you can play them on launch day and never sell your games back to the used market and never buy used games, you are still fucked if you, say, have a family of four and not only you, but your kids and wife enjoy playing games. Figure ten bucks per account per game? Now that $65 (with tax) game is suddenly $95 or more. And that's before you've bought the $40 worth of DLC.

    I'd like to be optimistic and say this all sounds like an incredible boon for the future of PC gaming, but the vast majority of consumers don't give a fuck, don't know a fuck, and will just let themselves get rolled.

  135. Bob's Game, for instance by tepples · · Score: 1

    I can't run Halo 4 on my modern desktop because a lawyer prevents the devs from making it.

    Nor can people run Bob's Game on a Nintendo handheld because a lawyer prevented Robert Pelloni from buying a devkit to port it. Indie games are far more likely to be PC exclusives simply because the developer cannot buy a console devkit.

  136. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Good to see that NASA is excluded from the world of computing...
    http://nepp.nasa.gov/whisker/

    Also the University of Maryland
    http://www.calce.umd.edu/lead-free/tin-whiskers/

    And Maxim Integrated...
    http://www.maximintegrated.com/app-notes/index.mvp/id/5250

  137. Voice recognition by Samuraid · · Score: 1

    Just so long as "Watch TV" doesn't actually translate to "Dear aunt, let's set so double the killer delete select all", I think we'll be good this time around.

    --
    if ($question !~ m/bb|[^b]{2}/i) { die(); }
  138. Re:Price by TWiTfan · · Score: 1

    Games/saves on stored remotely is a deal breaker for me.

    Maybe they're trying to help gaming addicts. When the internet goes down, Xbox gamers will have to go out into the streets along with all the crying WoW players, and get some sun.

    --
    The cow says "Moo." The dog says "Woof." The Timothy says "Thanks, valued customer. We appreciate your input."
  139. CORRECTION by tepples · · Score: 1

    photo of the item taken by the buyer

    This should be "by the seller", if it wasn't obvious.

  140. Thanks for pretending you understand jokes by tepples · · Score: 1

    If AMD is making the CPUs and GPUs for current consoles, why is it naming them after old consoles?

    1. Re:Thanks for pretending you understand jokes by GigaplexNZ · · Score: 1

      It's not, it's just a coincidence.

  141. "All of your entertainment"? by erroneus · · Score: 1

    Does that mean it comes with strippers and all that? I enjoy many forms of entertainment.

    1. Re:"All of your entertainment"? by Kalriath · · Score: 1

      It has a browser, therefore has access to porn.

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
  142. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by muon-catalyzed · · Score: 1

    PC games will be limited due to 32bit backwards compatibility issue, like 50% of the market is still 32bit. So buy yourself 16GB of RAM, but no game is gonna use it. Per process limit (32bit Windows) is about 2GB.. Cheers.

  143. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2

    They do say that Win8 Metro apps will be trivially portable. I can't help but wonder if that'll include games. For a lot of indie stuff, this would be quite sufficient.

  144. Design team fell asleep on this one by Dorianny · · Score: 1

    I can understand they want the xbox one to be a media entertainment machine but did they really have to make it look like a ugly, rented cable-box! Hopefully they did a better job with the packaging.

  145. Re:Ok, great! by Issarlk · · Score: 1

    I want benchmarks like these everyday please. It's not some dumbed down console corridor shooter like many other FPS.

  146. Confused grandmothers on Christmas by GoodNewsJimDotCom · · Score: 1

    People going to be getting the original Xbox for birthdays and Christmas now.

    I have a real question though: I thought the marketing rationale was: it was Xbox 360 because if they named it Xbox 2, people would say, "Hey playstation has a 3, xbox is only a 2, so I'll buy a playstation." So the name confuses me.

  147. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by AdamHaun · · Score: 1

    Those are decent specs for a gaming machine. Quad-core is standard (see Ivy Bridge and the upcoming Haswell for examples). Games released this month don't even recommend 8 GB of RAM, much less require it. 500 GB of hard drive space is plenty for games -- not so much for hoarding 1080p media, but it sounds like they're focused on streaming. Not sure what you mean about Blu-ray being obsolete, unless someone made a Violet-ray while I wasn't watching...

    --
    Visit the
  148. Re:oh i see by Issarlk · · Score: 4, Funny

    Think about it, saved games in the cloud is genius. Now when you move, you can plug the console at your new flat and all your saved games will be there!

  149. Lack of backwards compatability is a death blow by msobkow · · Score: 1

    The lack of backwards compatability is a death blow seeing as there are no "must have" features to drive people to buy the new system. I know many people who have acquired huge libraries of 360 games, and they're not going to want a machine that can't play them.

    Given the backwards compatability of the Windows software stack for gaming, I'm absolutely baffled as to why they couldn't implement backwards compatability for the 360 in a trivial fashion.

    Ah well. Looks like Windows 8 all over again. And Vista. And SE.

    All rolled into one massive FAIL.

    --
    I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
    1. Re:Lack of backwards compatability is a death blow by EvilSS · · Score: 1

      Presumably they already HAVE hardware that can play them. It's not like their 360's are going to stop working when they buy the One. As for why, they are switching processor architectures. They would have to emulate the 360 and no one really wants that.

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
    2. Re:Lack of backwards compatability is a death blow by tuffy · · Score: 1

      Microsoft switched CPUs and the new system isn't powerful enough to emulate the old in software, so it was pretty much certain the new X-Box would drop all compatibility. The problem is that this cuts off any migration path for 360 owners. So since they'll have to buy an all new library from scratch anyway, there's no reason not to jump ship to the PS4, Wii U or whatever. It's an understandable move, but one that's liable to hurt in the short term at least.

      --

      Ita erat quando hic adveni.

    3. Re:Lack of backwards compatability is a death blow by msobkow · · Score: 1

      Switching CPU architectures? I missed that.

      --
      I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
    4. Re:Lack of backwards compatability is a death blow by UnknowingFool · · Score: 2

      Yes new processor is a x86 based AMD. Xbox 360 used a Power based cell processor designed by IBM.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
  150. The One by RedDeadThumb · · Score: 1

    Note how people call "Xbox 360" "The 360". It is obviously MS marketing gimmick where they hope people will call "Xbox One" "The One". Personally I am hoping that people call it "The X-bone" so it backfires on them.

  151. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 1

    everyone with access to decent high speed internet you mean. More than half the US population still only has access to dial up or latency heavy satellite internet. So yeah, maybe YOU stream all your 1080p movies, but a lot of us are still stuck in the dark ages, where if we want to watch a movie, we queue it up from netflix, and pop it in the DVD or BlueRay player when it arrives in the mail.

    As for switching and distributing movies on flash drives, I can't think of any reason distributors would want to switch from a 1.80$ plastic disk to a 5$ drive with more potential points of failure.

    --
    I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
  152. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by sirsnork · · Score: 1

    That's true on a 32bit OS, on a 64bit OS an entire 4GB space can be given to a 32bit game, since the kernel doesn't need to reserve 2GB for itself to map video and everything else

    --

    Normal people worry me!
  153. MISSING SO MANY FEATURES by jsepeta · · Score: 1

    How about adding a feature so it doesn't take 5 minutes to get a group together for Call of Duty 3?

    --
    Remember kids, if you're not paying for the service, YOU ARE THE PRODUCT THAT IS BEING SOLD.
  154. Re:Just keep telling yourself you understand CPU a by EvanED · · Score: 1

    Eh, yes and no. So with the disclaimer that I'm no architect, here's my viewpoint:

    From the block diagram I saw, the halves of a module have separate integer pipes and separate L1 caches. IMO, if you say that I'm allowed to have a spectrum between "independent cores" and "SMT", those two characteristics on their own put Bulldozer at least halfway between the endpoints, and if I'm forced to pick a side I'm going to go with "two cores" rather than "one core SMT".

    Put it this way. The shared FPU doesn't kill the fact that they're separate cores. Is the Sun Niagra an 8-core chip (each core 4-way SMT) with a single shared FPU, or is it a 32-way SMT single-core chip with a single shared FPU? Because I suspect basically everyone would agree that the former is a far more accurate description than the latter.

    That basically leaves the shared decoder and dispatcher. And in my mind, the separate L1 caches "separate" the two halves at least as much as the decoder & dispatcher bind them together.

    So while it is probably misleading and incorrect to call bulldozer an 8-core chip, I feel it's more misleading to call bulldozer a 4-core, 2-way SMT chip.

  155. Re:Just keep telling yourself you understand CPU a by EvanED · · Score: 1

    ...separate L1 caches...

    Just to clarify, I'm talking about the data cache. The shared I-cache is another factor that blurs the distinction and moves it closer to the SMT end of the spectrum, but still not past the halfway point IMO.

    That basically leaves the shared decoder and dispatcher

    I guess also the bus interface from the module.

  156. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by sixoseven · · Score: 1

    The smartest real customers are game developers, and all of them have already bought into the console. The only mindless cretins who blindly accept the corporate overlords are the game developers who sign exclusive deals and don't go multiplatform. Then again, they have dollariffic reasons for doing so which are not hate-based, like your Soviet screed.

    --
    fault-tolerant
  157. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by Wescotte · · Score: 1

    The demo was very Star Trekish.. Sometimes he'd get the attention of the system by saying "Xbox" and then commands and other times he'd just say some commands. I'm interested what exactly it's listening for and how it determines if you actually are giving it commands. When playing games/watching TV how many false positives for commands is it going to process. Seems like a feature I would disable because it's problematic.

  158. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by spire3661 · · Score: 1

    IT was time that did it. MS HAD to get xbox360 out the door before Sony. At the time PS2 was a monster and no one knew that Sony was going to drop a $599 egg.

    --
    Good-bye
  159. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by spire3661 · · Score: 1

    Xbox and PS4 are going to be roughly identical hardware wise. The game devs demanded it.

    --
    Good-bye
  160. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by spire3661 · · Score: 1

    It IS a PC. Please stop with the 'consoles are hyper-optimized' bullshit.

    --
    Good-bye
  161. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by spire3661 · · Score: 1

    They went with One because they couldnt go to 4 and One signifies it as a 'unifying' experience. Its basically Microsoft hubris at its finest.

    --
    Good-bye
  162. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by NotBorg · · Score: 1

    If your OS doesn't suck that 14GB left over will be used for cache. So, it's not a complete waste.

    --
    I want this account deleted.
  163. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by sixoseven · · Score: 1

    You could run Crysis 3 on the intergalactic Borg network, it would still be a shitty game.

    --
    fault-tolerant
  164. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by TWiTfan · · Score: 2

    And do tell, exactly how are you going to play offline when every developer is going to claim that their game has to offload some of its processing to the "cloud" now (you know, the way EA did with SimCity)?

    Maybe if you pray hard enough, Jesus will miracle your game to work.

    --
    The cow says "Moo." The dog says "Woof." The Timothy says "Thanks, valued customer. We appreciate your input."
  165. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by TWiTfan · · Score: 1

    I suspect that demo was completely staged. There was probably someone behind the scenes actually running it.

    --
    The cow says "Moo." The dog says "Woof." The Timothy says "Thanks, valued customer. We appreciate your input."
  166. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

    So what you're saying is that PC + DRM and other assorted lock-in = Xbox? I think you should direct your "fuck, you are stupid" comment towards those who actually decide to buy it...

    --

    "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  167. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by suutar · · Score: 1

    My _personal_ problem with it is that it's not backwards compatible, which means I can't get rid of the xbox 360, which means Yet Another Item In The Entertainment Console, which will make my wife Not Happy. If enough good titles come out for it that aren't 360/ps3 available, she might decide it's worth it, but I don't expect that to be for at least a couple of years, and more likely she'll just play them at someone else's house.

  168. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

    The consumers (aka, the mindless bleating masses) may repurchase all of their games, but the customers, the ones who are able to make intelligent decisions instead of just blindly accepting everything their corporate overlords throw at them, would just hang on to their 360 consoles in order to play their 360 games, and only purchase new titles for this new system, if they decide they want it.

    "Customers" would never have bought a 360 in the first place.

    --

    "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  169. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by Bacon+Bits · · Score: 3, Funny

    I've been an Xbox owner since the Xbox 1.

    [Emphasis mine]

    Oh this generation is going to be fun.

    --
    The road to tyranny has always been paved with claims of necessity.
  170. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by Luckyo · · Score: 1

    The current shitlist includes but is not limited to:

    1. Fully able to both entirely block used games as well as mandate a significant fee to play used games.
    2. Fully attached to microsoft account in terms of games. Publishers can (read publishers will love to mandate this) DRM games with:
    a. Account/console binding game disks with forced installation to play. You can no longer take your game to your friend's place to play.
    b. Open possibility for always online DRM a la ubisoft built into the console.
    c. Usage of microsoft's cloud service to do something within the game (think diablo 3).
    3. Price of the system.
    4. Kinect being essentially a hard wired part of the system that is always watching you. Massive privacy issues. Likely in legal gray area/illegal in many countries in terms of usage of data by microsoft and may cause severe problems.
    5. Price of the games requiring online + microsoft's requirement to pay for online capability likely making your bought games effectively rented. Miss a monthly payment and lose access to your games.
    6. Heavy reliance on US-based services for much of unique features of the system while the most/one of the most profitable regions is currently EU where many of these services are not available for a wide number of reasons ranging from copyright and control issues to language issues to local laws.

    There's probably a whole lot more reasons why this console will be troublesome for many consumers and why many may choose to not buy it. But these are the ones that I've seen and heard actively discussed.

  171. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

    4 cores + HT is the most that Intel offers for desktops at the moment, and they outperform AMD. Clearly a top end CPU was out of the question anyway due to cost. 8GB is pretty healthy, remembering that until late last year Intel's mobile i7 CPUs didn't even support more than 4GB.

    BluRay is the current generation and highest capacity optical drive available. What else is there for physical media? Or were you hoping for download-only, because I don't think many people would be happy with that.

    500GB HDD... What were you planning to put on it? And how much do you want to pay? Keep in mind that it's not just the cost you as a consumer pay - MS gets bulk prices but that includes fewer rights to return faulty units (which cost them money to swap out at the service department anyway) so for them picking a single 500GB platter model that will be a bit cheaper and a few percent more reliable than a 1TB model is very much worth it.

    Doubtless it will be behind the curve even at launch when compared to PCs, but this thing will be the current machine for at least 5 years so even if it was cutting edge it would only be for a fraction of its lifetime.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  172. I makes sence in a perverse sort of way. by excelsior_gr · · Score: 1

    Since they decided that our PC should look like a phone, then our gaming console should certainly play like a PC.

    WHAT?!

  173. Re:When will Mozilla follow this approach? by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1

    There was once something with a vaguely similar name, if that helps.

    --
    Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
  174. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by suutar · · Score: 1

    perhaps they figure streaming makes spinning plastic obsolete. Personally, spinning plastic will be a feature of my entertainment life at least until Netflix has all the language/subtitle options for the foreign films, and probably longer (since I already have a fair amount of such plastic).

  175. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

    Did you forget nVidia? They had Pb-free soldering issues as well. I fixed hundreds of laptops with failed nVidia chipsets using a hot air rework station back in the day. The PS3 had the Yellow Light of Death which was Pb related too.

    MS were just the worst affected due to the design of their chip producing a lot of heat. Well, maybe apart from HP who had every single laptop they made for about 3 years affected by the nVidia bug, but they wriggled out of that and didn't do an extended warranty/replacement service.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  176. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 2

    technically true if you only care about integer instructions

    Hmm, what else would you care about when you have a powerful dedicated streaming FP unit in the same address space (i.e., easier data exchange and low data exchange latency)?

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
  177. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by NotBorg · · Score: 1

    In my experience they can and do suddenly stop working at random. Once they stop selling them you'll have maybe 2 years and then have no choice but to switch because those fucking things don't last that long. Both MS and anyone who's not a brainwashed tool knows it. If you want to continue to play the same games, you'll have to buy them yet again.

    I'll stick with Steam, thank you very much. I have games for PC that still play just fine from over 10 years ago. And yes, playing video games for graphics is like watching porn for plot and acting.

    --
    I want this account deleted.
  178. Playing doctor by tepples · · Score: 1

    A 2-player game of Dr. Mario isn't incest; it's just playing doctor.

  179. The cloud? by garyoa1 · · Score: 1

    It's moving everything into the cloud? That worked out well for simcity. So I guess they force you into paying for live as well.

    I have a 360 w/konect but only use it for streaming video. Hate playing with controllers.

    Not to mention typing on one is a real blast. /sarcasm.

    And STILL no keyboard control? It seems to me they could pull tons of users in if they just add keyboard control. With all the console haters out there just that one addition would instantly kill off the competition.

    --
    Wuddooeyeno? IITYWYBMAD? Like nuts? eclecticallyincorrect.com
    1. Re:The cloud? by madwheel · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure why everyone is bashing the cloud. If I have more than one Xbox, which I do, my game saves are on both devices without having to save the file to an overpriced flash drive and then deal with moving it from box to box and worry about losing it. They don't charge extra money for cloud saves because they already screwed you with an annual $60 charge. The feature itself can come in handy for those who use. For those who don't, it currently offers no hindrance on my gameplay or experience. I for one do support cloud saves. Now cloud based gaming is an entirely different animal that I am not too fond of.

    2. Re:The cloud? by garyoa1 · · Score: 1

      Until you need to get to the cloud and it's off line. I guess no one remembers (not long ago) when the google cloud died and folks who had no copy on their own machine lost it all. Cloud may be fine for a backup but when it's all you have it's a problem. Ask those who bought the latest simcity.

      I have my own servers so that's where I back up to. And folks who "back up" and then delete the files on their own machine... aren't backing up. They're just making a copy. Backup is a copy in more than one location.

      But again, until they come up with a keyboard option... I see no reason to upgrade just to (in my case) stream video. I can do that with the 360.

      --
      Wuddooeyeno? IITYWYBMAD? Like nuts? eclecticallyincorrect.com
  180. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by EvanED · · Score: 1

    And why does it have to be 1080p? Lower resolutions don't exist?

    They exist, but given the choice between "stream a lower resolution" and "wait a couple days for a blu-ray at 1080p", for many things and in most situations, I at least would choose the latter.

  181. It's finally becoming true... by simplerThanPossible · · Score: 1

    In soviet russia, home entertainment system watches YOU!

        > 1080p camera... 60 FPS. Field of view increased by 60%....
        > motion tracking... detect skin pigmentation changes related to heart rate

    Seriously, imagine being able to measure consumers' emotional reaction to advertisements... if you were worried about information being gathered about you, with google adwords targeting you by search, or facebook data-mining your social network, you ain't seen nothing yet.

  182. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by KZigurs · · Score: 1

    Riiight... The NVidia scandal just didn't happen.

  183. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by Kal+Zekdor · · Score: 1

    As someone else pointed out, the 360 is (was?) sold below manufacturing cost. If you buy a lot of systems and few games, you're damaging their bottom line.

    Mutually assured destruction anyone? Yeah, buying a bunch of consoles and no games would damage Microsoft's bottom line, but it would be far worse for yours, no? If you wanted to throw money at damaging Microsoft, buy stock in their competitors.

  184. Re: I look forward to hearing about why this will by s.petry · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The courts and politicians were not nearly as corrupt in the 70s as they are today. You can read every case on US-DOJ regarding Microsoft being found guilty of predatory monopolistic practices, and see what their punishments (or lack thereof) were.

    This is in addition to numerous states that have found them guilty of predatory monopolistic practices, and receiving no punishment.

    --

    -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

  185. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by EvanED · · Score: 1

    What else is there for physical media?

    Flash and download.

    Download isn't physical media and is inferior in many situations and fatal in some. Flash would definitely have been an alternative, but is substantially more expensive and doesn't retain compatibility with people's existing audio CDs, DVDs, and movie blu-ray discs.

    Besides, I wouldn't be too surprised if there would be a way for game devs to distribute games on flash (especially if they start bugging MS for it), and I'd be astonished if there's no game download service. I mean, that already exists; it's not like DVDs are the only way to get games onto a 360. Just because MS says "hey we've got a blu-ray drive" doesn't mean that's what every single game will use.

  186. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1

    I though one of the common complaints of gamers was that the XBox 360 and PS3 were holding back development. If the XBox One has 8 GB, "ports" of Xbox One games will also be written to take advantage of more than 2 GB of memory.

  187. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by KZigurs · · Score: 2

    This deserves an upvote.

    Consoles are great not because they have good specs (they mostly have shitty ones). They are great because they present developers with a fixed hardware target for a decade or so. Games development on consoles is not too dissimilar from Demo scene, just that all the little tips and tricks get applied to all those games.

    Give me a fixed target and I'll optimise the hell out of it. With results.

  188. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by cbhacking · · Score: 1

    How is the Surface *Pro* a disaster? Microsoft appears to be selling them about as fast as they can manufacture them. The Surface RT (uses ARM chips and runs the crippled-desktop Windows RT) has had disappointing sales, not the Pro.

    --
    There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
  189. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by s.petry · · Score: 1

    Sounds like someone believed a salesman at best buy that told them "really, it's a gaming PC by Gateway". **sigh**

    --

    -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

  190. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by Gideon+Fubar · · Score: 1

    Mmmm it'll probably be the (apparent) fact that you have to enter a code manually into the box after purchasing a game in order to have it 'verified online and linked to your Xbox Live account', coupled with the fact that your friend who wants to borrow the game will have the opition to do so... but only if they pay the full retail value of said game.

    Oh, there's also the brand new, feature packed online trading system for second hand games... which will be extremely popular with retailers (who are already totally enthused about the auth code system), as well as gamers who will be able to see that they're still paying significantly more for '2nd hand' digital content than they can get back by rescinding their rights to it.

    --
    http://www.xkcd.com/354/
  191. Console gaming and CPU by danbob999 · · Score: 1

    Why do gaming console manufacturer always insist on the CPU? Nintendo used a 64 bit CPU in its Nintendo 64 and there was no benefit to anyone. The more powerful, later consoles were 32 bits.
    And now Microsoft choose an 8 cores CPU. Most games won't use more than 2-4 cores and the others will be useless, just like they were in the PS3.

    GPU is much more important. And they seem to use a crappy one.

  192. Re:oh i see by complete+loony · · Score: 1

    Now when you get a replacement console due to the next "red ring of death" hardware issue, all your saved games will be there! Or they will be once they finish downloading.

    --
    09F91102 no, 455FE104 nope, F190A1E8 uh-uh, 7A5F8A09 that's not it, C87294CE no. Ah! 452F6E403CDF10714E41DFAA257D313F.
  193. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by hobarrera · · Score: 1

    The xbox has me fed up turning on every time I said "xbox on".

    Oops, I think I just turned on half a dozen.

  194. Re: I look forward to hearing about why this will by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

    Actually, Microsoft only got off (nearly) scott-free with the feds. They had to pay out hundreds of millions to states and billions to private parties, who all relied on the federal judgement.

    --
    When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
  195. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by dadelbunts · · Score: 1

    Salesman? I just bought the highest specd thing available in my pricerange.

  196. Stated goal by amanaplanacanalpanam · · Score: 1

    Their stated goal for the Xbox One is to have a single device provide "all of your entertainment."

    it will not be backward-compatible with Xbox 360 games

    These two statements are mutually exclusive.

  197. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by eclectro · · Score: 1

    Because the next console will be the X Box Zero ??

    --
    Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
  198. It has FM radio gestures by caywen · · Score: 1

    I hear you can tune into FM radio stations simply by using your arm as the antenna. You just have to keep it that way while you listen.

  199. You got specs? by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    Seriously. I've read several articles and all I could find was it (probably) is running the same AMD hardware the PS3 has. The Kinect is super cheap to make, so that's not adding much cost either.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  200. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by GigaplexNZ · · Score: 1

    4 cores + HT is the most that Intel offers for desktops at the moment, and they outperform AMD.

    They've got some 6 core CPUs too.

  201. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by GigaplexNZ · · Score: 1

    Software wise, they are more optimised than a generic desktop OS. Hardware wise, this is just a locked down PC.

  202. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by jedidiah · · Score: 1

    $5? Are you kidding? The retail cost of some BluRays is that low now. Even at $10, you're not leaving a lot of room for other things like retailer markup or the studio actually making some money.

    NOBODY streams nowadays. Despite the hype, the numbers are still pretty low. They just get a lot of attention because most people have no grasp of numbers.

    They have a staggering lack of perspective as well as extreme narcissism and a tendency to think they represent everyone.

    --
    A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  203. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by jedidiah · · Score: 1

    > I'm speaking globally, not US-centric. And why does it have to be 1080p? Lower resolutions don't exist?

    Lower resolutions and bitrates are certainly less satisfying.

    If you are talking "not US-centric" then you have the problem of alternate language tracks and subtitles. This is an area where streaming services tend to fall down rather badly.

    It's not just the low quality video stream.

    --
    A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  204. Re:oh i see by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

    And why can't aren't my games on the damn console I moved to begin with? I fail to see the value added. Now if my console got destroyed during the move, that's a different story.

    --
    Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
  205. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by tmach · · Score: 1

    They addressed the "always on" rumor. Specifically, they said that while the console will require an internet connection for many of its features (and, presumably, game registration) it will not have to be constantly connected.

  206. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by c9brown · · Score: 1

    Actually, this is nothing new. Most consoles, at launch, would lose on paper to their counter-part mid-range PC at launch. So what?

    1.) There's more to hardware than the listed specs. For instance, Xbox360 had lots of architectural features that made it a poor choice for general computing but excellent for a typical gaming load. One example was a cache architecture tuned for streaming data (i.e. reading of a disc or streaming in geometry and textures). Also, consoles typically require less overhead in terms of things like OS footprint, etc. than PCs. Thus, despite the numbers, consoles are typically able to keep up with PCs that out match them in terms of specs alone.

    2.) Developers can focus their efforts on a single architecture when developing for consoles. This entails huge performance gains from various optimizations that would not be feasible when developing for the heterogeneous PC architecture landscape. (Certainly there are exceptions to this i.e. Game A gets optimized code for GPU B, but this is certainly not a guarantee when buying the game). Furthermore, developers have much longer to find particular optimizations for the hardware given that the console life-cycle is typically 5 - 10 years. Notice how much better the last titles in a console generation look compared to those at launch.

    Finally, $300 to $400 doesn't buy you much in terms of a gaming rig. I know, I just tried to build one on that budget.

  207. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by DaHat · · Score: 2

    After they got RROD'd, they ALL went out and bought another at full price. One of my friends is now on his 13th one.

    Then your friend is either likes throwing away money, knows nothing about warranties, or is doing modding that invalidates his warranty (which could also be to blame for his HW failures).

    If memory serves... each 360 comes with a year hardware warranty... and if a unit dies and it's replaced under warranty... the replacement gets a fresh 1 year warranty.

    Given the 360 hit the US 7 years, 6 months, 29 days ago... it's hard to believe that each of his 13 units died on day 366 (as there isn't enough time between then and now)... I'm more inclined to believe you are full of crap.

  208. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by MitchDev · · Score: 1

    Dunno that Sony is going to be any better on that issue though...

  209. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by Nyder · · Score: 1

    Funny how my 500$ pc i bought last year is unable to play any games i have on xbox. And when it does they usually run and look like shit.

    When you buy computers from Dell, it does NOT surprise anyone they can't play games.

    --
    Be seeing you...
  210. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This article confirms that both the CPU and GPU are based on AMD designs. Which means it will be an "8-core" CPU the same way the Bulldozer is 8-core: technically true if you only care about integer instructions, but it's more accurate to say there are four modules than eight cores.

    That would be true if the article confirmed that it was using a derivative of the Bulldozer CPU core. Instead, it confirms that Microsoft selected the Jaguar core, which is a much different design that is not based on modules at all, and has no support for multiple threads per core (that I'm aware of). So it's eight full cores. But they're not very powerful cores, especially by Bulldozer standards.

    Both Microsoft and Sony chose this core for their new consoles because it makes more sense than a relatively heavy desktop core like Bulldozer. It uses far less power and die area per core. A game console needs most of the chip's area and power budget allocated to the GPU, not the CPU.

  211. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by Nyder · · Score: 1

    Funny how my 500$ pc i bought last year is unable to play any games i have on xbox. And when it does they usually run and look like shit.

    forgot to add this in my last reply. Pretty much all the Xbox ports to PC sucks and runs bad, so it's not a surprise.

    --
    Be seeing you...
  212. Re:Does it work in other languages than English? by ikaruga · · Score: 1

    I'd prefer in Klingon, for reasons that are the exact opposite you said.

  213. Kinect optional or required? by fikx · · Score: 1

    Haven't seen any updates beyond that each One comes with a Kinect now.
    If Kinect is now required (games require it to play or the system errors if it's not plugged in) then it's a no-sale for me. Kinect is interesting tech, but not when hooked up to a MS owned box...especially one that is "always on and ready" .

    --
    AB HOC POSSUM VIDERE DOMUM TUUM
  214. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

    And hackable ... didn't Panasonic have trouble with their Skype TVs having the cameras hacked remotely?

    --
    - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
  215. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

    Voice controls in Sing Star are quite smooth but still delayed a fraction of a second. I wouldn't put it past either company to have excellent voice control this generation. I still don't want people talking to the TV to change channels.

    --
    - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
  216. MS has killed off Rental by Nyder · · Score: 1

    I guess no one will be renting Xbox One games to check out anymore, since the "used disk" fee will pop up.

    --
    Be seeing you...
  217. I already have an Xbox1 by kazekirifx · · Score: 1

    Seriously, what's with the name? I've heard people using "Xbox 1" as slang for the original Xbox for as long as the 360 has been around.

  218. Re: I look forward to hearing about why this will by iamhassi · · Score: 1

    If a dollar a week is too much than by all means don't buy ANY console. The two real advantages of the new Xbox One is the Kinect 2.0 was designed with the system so all games will be compatible and the fact that the Xbox One is NOT backwards compatible so all games are original Xbox One titles designed to work with the new Kinect. The new Kinect and requiring Xbox One games could be the game changer that can kill the Wii U's interactivity and PS4's graphic advantage. I don't own a xbox 360 but I might buy a xbox one depending on the titles. I'd love to see a fitness trainer game that could watch and adjust if the workout is too hard or easy for the user and respond accordingly in real-time with additional coaching or changing the program.

    --
    my karma will be here long after I'm gone
  219. Re: I look forward to hearing about why this will by iamhassi · · Score: 1

    It's not bullshit, it's been well known since the 80s that consoles can do more than PCs because they are locked down boxes with the exact same specs rather than trying to test a game on dozens of CPUs and GPUs and just making it "good enough" to work on the average CPU and GPU. That's the problem with PCs, you can make a beautiful looking game that runs on only the latest $600 video card and looks like a slid show on $100 cards or you can make an average looking game that runs on $100 video cards but you can't have it both ways, and since they wanna sell as many copies of the game as possible which one do you think they're going to do?

    --
    my karma will be here long after I'm gone
  220. XBOX YAWN by Neo-Rio-101 · · Score: 1

    xbox yawn

    --
    READY.
    PRINT ""+-0
  221. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by Jaruzel · · Score: 1

    Absolute Rubbish.

    The early PS3's YLOD failure issues are also all down to the same thing as the XBox360s RROD - cracks and whiskers in Pb-Free solder.

    -Jar

    --
    Together, We Can Make Slashdot Better. I Do NOT Mod ACs. - Check Me Out
  222. Re:oh i see by Inda · · Score: 1

    Thanks AC! You've made my morning!

    More gems today please.

    --
    This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
  223. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by Xest · · Score: 1

    So why did you say you'd go for a PS4? Do you seriously think the publishers if they're going to go the Sim City route of needing "cloud processing" that they'll somehow skip that on the PS4?

    I'm not happy with the XBox one unveil because of the crap about publishers being able to charge a fee for second hand games - for me, someone with two consoles because my partner likes to play at the same time as me too that usually means that it's going to be tied to my account meaning she can't play it on her account when I'm using mine in a different room.

    That doesn't mean I'll get a PS4 though as I also have a PS3 and whilst I enjoy some of the exclusives on it like the Uncharted and the LBP series and find it makes a decent Bluray player it can be frustrating to use sometimes given that it seems to constantly need updating and when it does the updates are large and slow compared to the 360. Given the PS4's lacklustre unveil too (arguably worse than the XBox one's) given that it seems to be even more of the same than the new XBox is I think most realistically right now I'll get neither unless one offers some compelling looking games or something.

    I don't think anyone is taking issue with your annoyance at the way things are going, but if you scream "I'm going to get a PS4 instead!" as if it's some magical panacea that doesn't have the same and arguably worse flaws than the XBox One then it just makes you sound like a fanboy. At least both seem way better than the WiiU but I'm baffled as to why both Sony and Microsoft seem to think it's a good idea to announce features that are anti-consumer, it's as if they've forgotten who the customer is and believe it's the publisher, not the gamer.

  224. Not the first question that came to my mind... by Krokus · · Score: 1

    By this point, you're probably asking: does it play games?

    No, I am asking, "Does any of this media integration work outside the U.S.?"

    Google, for example, likes to go on about the wonderful features of Google Now. Being in Canada, I find that many of those features don't work, like song identification, for example. And tracking my favourite sports teams? Google Now isn't even aware that the Canadian Football League exists.

    So why would I expect Xbox One's TV listings to work?

  225. Re:Hahahaha by Xest · · Score: 1

    Yeah great, buy a PS4 and end up with a console that has less and less features the longer you own it, where the company denies you replacement if it develops a fault because that'd make them red faced after they made such a fuss about RROD, where your personal details are spread far and wide across the net by inept security practices and where you're treated like you should be grateful for being allowed to have a PS4 rather than as a customer.

    Seriously, the fact you've claimed how good you think the PS4 will be in every post so far on this thread (despite the fact Sony hasn't even given enough information to know how they may or may not fuck you yet) shows you're just a Sony fanboy. Fuck off already, we saw that tactic a million times over last time, it's not new, it's not clever, and we don't care.

    We will however laugh in your face after you spend 2 years spending every waking moment supporting your beloved Sony only for them to turn around and fuck you over, because that's what happened last time, and that's what we did last time.

  226. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by Zebedeu · · Score: 2

    I also bought a second one after the first one RROD'd.

    It's not about being "extremely loyal" as you put it, it's about being pragmatic:
    - I still want to play games on a console, so I'd have to either fix it or buy a new one
    - Fixing the old Xbox would cost about as much as a new one, and the new one is simply better (quieter, extra controller, lower energy, wifi, larger HD, etc)
    - I have a game library which I'd like to be able to replay
    - I can use my old controller

    Honestly I've always preferred the Playstation, but I won the Xbox in a contest a few years ago, and it made no sense to go out and spend extra money on a console which is essentially the same.
    For the next generation it'll be a PS for me. Either that or a box running Linux+Steam connected to the TV.

    As for your friend breaking 12 Xboxes, that's really too much. I wouldn't lend him anything if I were you.

  227. Re:Does it have tv tunner? cable card? satellite T by BancBoy · · Score: 1

    Tuner. It's tuner you illiterate tool.

    No, it's 'tuna'.

    It's not a Tuna!

    --
    [UID-HeinzIntel]
  228. Re:oh i see by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

    But for gaming I prefer the convenience of the console, being able to fit it in my TV cabinet, and the knowledge that I can buy a game and it will just work.

    My experience with consoles hasn't been that great actually. I have had games (like the latest Resident Evil) on the original PS3 (HD screen) perform like utter crap (literally, some scenes went down to something like 7fps). I have seen similar issues on the xbox 360 in GTA4 too. Sorry, but I don't buy your argument. At least on the PC if I encounter a game being crap, I can find a workaround, but not on consoles!

    --
    Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
  229. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by Dekonega · · Score: 1

    Xbox One / 10 will fail because...

    No games. No seriously. Microsoft doesn't have anything to show us. They don't care about gaming at all. It took them 30 minutes to even mention games and gaming on Xbox One. And even when talking about games they just talked about their intentions. Microsoft only displayed three games on stage. And two of which were not even real gameplay but a prerendered video. Remedy's next game was sneak peeked and offered at least little bit of actual gameplay from an actual game. But then again the Microsoft caused a huge disappointment, a huge disappointment, among the fans of Remedy. Remedy's core audience consists mostly if not only Windows-PC gamers. There's just no way they can make their game exclusive and get away with it. Alan Wake was released for Windows too and so will this Quantum thing. We just have to wait during which Microsoft will do their best to promote the game as Xbox exclusive title. Nobody will buy a device based on a single title.

    DRM - The Game Console. There's some trick going to be involved regarding selling and buying used games. What that trick is we don't know yet. But EA dropping their online pass was probably something they did in preparation for this. Microsoft spesifically says that buying used games is possible but ther aren't "disclosing more information about this at the moment" which is very suspicious. At least Microsoft's officials confirmed that you can go to a friend's house with the game, and once you've logged in with your own account and installed the game then you guys can play the game. Microsoft is not going to ask a fee for additional installs of game unlike the various sources reported. However Microsoft didn't confirm if the accounts which are associated with the device ID of the device your game is initially registered with can also run the game without asking you to login to your account first. Technically this could mean that not all the family members can even launch the game. Microsoft also essentially admits that you cannot borrow a game from your friend. Probably the most essential aspect of the closed gaming platforms and now you just cannot do it anymore. This is going to cribble Xbox One so badly that we can essentially already make the call that Xbox One will be the loser of the upcoming generation.

    Always on-line not required but for all pratical purposes it has to be always on-line. If you buy a new game from a shop, you will not be able to play it unless the first time you play it you're connected to the internet so that the game's content ID can be registered with your account ID. Game developers and publishers are given tools to enable always on-line for their games. Xbox One games don't have to be constantly on-line, but if for example the publisher decides that the game has to be always online to function, then they are able to do it. Which is pretty much line with Microsoft's alignment with region-locked content. Game developer and publisher are given choise to region-lock their game if they so want.

    Xbox One is made by Americans for Americans. The TV stuff only works in the USA. The content services tied to the Xbox One only work in USA. And most of the functionality Microsoft spoke of will only work in USA. This will restrict the sales of the new Xbox dramatically.

    Every game is installed into the HDD in the name of "progress". Xbox One has an HDD users cannot replace. But Microsoft offers two USB 3.0 ports which you can plug-in external HDD and at least Microsoft claims that users can use the external HDD just like the internal e.g. installing the games, profile management, etc.

    Kinect is a requirement. This is not just creepy but probably a outright violation of digital rights. First of all Kinect will always be monitoring the room for "Xbox on" command. Even when it seemingly is not powered. Since we know that the device's user agreement will contain something alone the lines of "submitting audio samples to microsoft for improving the service quality" the thing stinks already. Call me

  230. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

    as able to adapt to the Pb-free initiative without all the drama and years of failed hardware.

    Not at all. Mission critical things were excluded, so aerospace, medical and military are still allowed to use lead if they wish.

    Non Pb solder is much harder to work with. Try it: it's obvious even using the stuff.

    However the problems don't end there. It's done hotter, which leads to more component failure. It also leads to larger thremal stresses due to gerater thermal expansion during soldering. It's harder and less malleable, which means that it cracks more easily. Eutectic solder, and in fact pure lead anneal and indeed creep at room temperature. This means that stress induced damage actually slowly self heals over time quite astonishingly.

    Then there's the trouble with tin whiskers.

    Pb free solder is a pain in the ass, but not as much as heavy metal poisioning. But make no mistake it is not as easy to work with.

    --
    SJW n. One who posts facts.
  231. Re:Just keep telling yourself you understand CPU a by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

    The Sun Niagara is (or was?) a very differnet beast to the type of SMT on Intel and the Power chips.

    AFAICT the Niagara is basically a barrel processor and switches threads once per clock tick. That provides excellent latency hiding, but has nearly a duplicated set of everything for every thread. But they can be smaller, simpler and slower units since they only go active once every N clock cycles.

    On the other hand, the SMT of the Intel and Power variety is different. It has one set of stuff and just tries to jam two (or 4) threads worth of instructions into it. I say "just", but of course it's a rather harder problem.

    The difference is that the barrel threads go 1/N times as fast but are N times as latency tolerant (giving theoretically a higher throughput). Whereas on intel, the speedup depends on the workload very much more.

    The bulldozer is much more like the Intel one than the Sun one in implementation. But the shared chunk is much smaller, and much less sharing occurs between threads.

    --
    SJW n. One who posts facts.
  232. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

    On a 32 bit machine it is trycky to go over 2GB per process since you suddenly have to become awfully careful about pointer differences.

    --
    SJW n. One who posts facts.
  233. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by serviscope_minor · · Score: 2

    Not sure what you mean about Blu-ray being obsolete

    He believes that everyone has a fast internet connection, I suppose. He's forgotten that even people London (e.g. me) have to suffer on a 4mbps DSL connection due to a mix of non upgraded exchanges and very strict planning rules blocking visible RCU boxes.

    --
    SJW n. One who posts facts.
  234. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

    Consoles are great not because they have good specs (they mostly have shitty ones).

    The Cell proessor did boast a quite astonishing peak floating point throughput when it debuted. Whether it was better is left as an exercise for the poor sods who had to program the blighter, but in some domains it had much better performance than the top end PCs at the time.

    --
    SJW n. One who posts facts.
  235. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by HaZardman27 · · Score: 1

    Why don't you tell that to John Carmack.

    --
    Apparently wizard is not a legitimate career path, so I chose programmer instead.
  236. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by HaZardman27 · · Score: 1

    And if the 360's OS was as large as a normal desktop version of Windows, there would be no way you could play modern AAA games on it when it only has 512MB of RAM shared between CPU and GPU. Once again, you've completely failed to refute any of my points.

    --
    Apparently wizard is not a legitimate career path, so I chose programmer instead.
  237. Re:oh i see by jma05 · · Score: 1

    > I got my XBox 360 in 2008 and paid £300 for it. (The mid-life RROD resulted in repair/replacement by Microsoft free of charge). To this day, that single unit still plays all the new games released for it. In five years time, will today's top end PC still play the newest games released for the PC?

    Like you, I fancy a fast PC for my work, and so, the GPU is the only added cost. PC gaming is much cheaper when you build your PC. Like you, I find always-on requirements of games annoying and an all-seeing eye/ear... creepy. I could turn the camera off, but that is the significant component of the value proposition.

    In late 2008, I got a GTX 260 for $200. I see at least another 2 years of life on it. Possibly more. One reason is that I accumulated a rather large library on online sales (many highly rated AAA titles at $2.50 - $5.00) that I have not gotten around to yet. The GPU pays for itself on cheaper games and no online fees alone.

    Even for new games, only first-person perspective games need to be played at medium settings. Upcoming non-FP games like Company of Heroes 2 (a PC exclusive) will play just fine on my card. And even for new first-person games, I just need to tone down the settings to current console grade (medium), they play just fine. The card will further work for many more years if I find low settings acceptable.

    The idea of extended life cycles of consoles is over-rated. The so called console optimization (fixed specs) only eeks out a certain percentage. It appears to be a larger effect with esoteric architectures since the devs produce worse products early on, not as much because they get so good later on. That, I can match later with CPU/GPU overclocks, that you cannot on a console. PC had 1080p, a generation ago. With inexpensive tuners, not only can I watch TV on my PC, I have been recording shows for a while, unlike what can be done with XBox One. Switch between TV, DVD, Game with no lag? OK, nothing new, apart from gesture and voice commands.

    After the next gen consoles have been in the market for an year or two, I will get another mid-range GPU (which should be about $200 and considerably faster than a console GPU - the consoles have mid-range GPUs by today's standards, and won't by launch date, let alone later) after selling my old card (while maintaining backward compatibility with my library) to offset the price further. That should cover me easily for the next console generation. Previously, console ports performed worse on CPU load. This time, since they are all x86-64, the differences should be less noticeable.

  238. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by s.petry · · Score: 1

    500 bucks won't get you a gaming PC, you should have done some homework before spending. It's cheapest to buy your own rig, but you also need to know how to build it. Motherboard, Memory, CPU and graphics card for a "gaming" rig are 500 bucks alone. Add in the other items (disk, dvd/cd, sound card) and you are easily close to a grand.

    If you didn't believe a salesmen, you still used poor logic. The most expensive home office PC is not a gaming PC, the most expensive word processing PC is still not a gaming PC, etc... Gaming has different requirements, like high end graphics and a bus to support the graphics. You simply don't have either in a 500 dollar PC, especially when you consider that the graphics card alone for a "good" gaming PC is around 200 bucks.

    --

    -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

  239. Re: I look forward to hearing about why this will by s.petry · · Score: 3, Informative

    As stated, go read the punishments. In most cases, Microsoft had to provide their proprietary software for X number of years for free. It was not a cash payment, and never changed the economic landscape for competition (which is the whole point of punishing predatory monopolies). In fact, when MS has to provide "free for X years" products, it further entrenches the monopoly.

    They paid Novell peanuts for the damage they did to "Office" products, and the same with other competition they removed by predatory practices (there are exceptions in private law suits, but those are not what I mentioned). The exception for payment damages is the EU, but we are not talking about the EU.

    --

    -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

  240. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1

    Mostly it's articles like this, but I'm not entirely sure that counts, since it's outselling the Nexus 10.

    I think the gist is "If Windows makes up such a huge portion of the desktop segment, why isn't Microsoft seeing the same success with tablets?"—of course, we can all answer that question a hundred times over, so... Good catch, and points to you.

    --
    Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
  241. Changing games on a Magnavox Odyssey by tepples · · Score: 1

    I do have plenty of computers.

    Can all these computers run games, or are some of them stuck with an Intel GMA?

    So do my friends. And we all have steam accounts and copies of whatever game we want to play.

    I have two questions for you: Are games on Steam so cheap that a householder with multiple children could buy three or four copies of a game for what a single copy of a console game costs?

    Nobody is going to lug a TV around. I hope steam gets around to solving this issue. Their steam box would be a really overall cheap way for me to throw a console next to the TV.

    Another cheap way is to buy or build a $400 AMD PC, put it next to the TV, and search for controller-friendly titles. Hairyfeet could explain in more detail.

    consumers wouldn't want to get off the couch to change game discs to play a different game

    Console gamers have been changing cartridges since the Magnavox Odyssey in 1972 changed games with jumper packs.

    But if the game installs to HDD how do you prevent people from just passing the disc around their group of friends and getting 18 copies for free?

    Burn a unique disc serial number in the burst cutting area, like GameCube and Wii discs. Connect to the Internet when a game is activated and once a month thereafter to renew the receipt, like Steam. But here's the big change: allow a game to be activated on any console if its receipt hasn't been renewed in 45 days. An unactivated game plays only the first episode, much like an unregistered copy of Doom.

    one-time use keys which are going to piss off customers a little and piss off retail partners a lot (they'll be cheaper than new copies of the disc, so customers can pass around a disc and get multiple copies for a lot less than $60 and retailers don't get anything besides the initial disc sale)

    Retailers don't get any cut of game sales for iPad or Android tablets unless they're made with an iTunes or Google Play gift card. Yet I see tablets in Walmart, Best Buy, and Staples.

  242. Re: I look forward to hearing about why this will by spire3661 · · Score: 1

    Jsut no. This generation of consoles taught the devs how to scale a game to multiple targets really well. Bioshock Infinite plays better on a Celeron 1610 with integrated GPU then it does on Xbox360, AT HIGHER RESOLUTION. Yes having a stable target on consoles is good and they do get micro optimization as a result, BUT the raw horsepower of PC mitigates pretty solidly. Optimization at this scale stopped mattering for PC around Core2Duo.

    --
    Good-bye
  243. Compare to console exclusives by tepples · · Score: 1

    Gamers already have to choose between the set of games for one console and the set of games for another console. How is Steam vs. GOG any different, other than that it's a lot cheaper to choose "both" for PC app stores than for console hardware? The problem with consoles is that if you choose a console over a PC, you're committing to DRM for all games because console operating systems won't even launch an executable that lacks the DRM.

    1. Re:Compare to console exclusives by EvanED · · Score: 1

      Oh, I know. Let me try to recap my argument, because I suspect we're not actually disagreeing all that much. :-)

      The conversation started with Holi saying "Find a console that isn't locked down that people actually want then come back with your whining" and you responding with "PC", and then the discussion changed to DRM on the PC.

      My argument is that DRM is still a significant factor on the PC. Sure, the situation is better than it is on consoles both because there are some DRM-free games and because you can even do that in the first place if you want, but few people in my experience are willing to actually forgo games with DRM. And in some sense I would say that's DRM is rather closer to the rule than the exception, and I suspect this post by you was more focusing on the exceptions.

      It's pretty much just that focus that I objected to rather than the fact that PCs are a better ecosystem.

    2. Re:Compare to console exclusives by tepples · · Score: 1

      My focus on the exceptions was to highlight that the PC platform isn't locked down, even if individual games might happen to be. It's still possible for a team of amateurs or a startup to release a game on PC even if it doesn't qualify for a console license, and a DRM-free game at that.

  244. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by EvanED · · Score: 1

    How do you expect a 32-bit program with no knowledge of 64-bit processors to be able to tell the OS to not give it the full 4 GB, because the developer wasn't careful?

    That happens by default on Windows. By default, programs only get 2GB of address space, and Windows "uses" (just doesn't give out, really) the other 2GB.

    If a programmer thinks they're careful, they opt into the larger address space by setting the IMAGE_FILE_LARGE_ADDRESS_AWARE flag in their PE header (usually by passing a linker flag).

    So now we can get to your question, and there are two answers:

    1) Even if a program doesn't have knowledge of 64-bit Windows, they can still get some benefit from setting that flag: on a 32-bit Windows system configured to support it, they'll get a 3GB address space instead of 2GB.

    2) If a program has no knowledge about the large-address-aware flag at all, then they "tell the OS to not give it the full 4 GB" by doing nothing.

    In Firefox's case, Mozilla has set this flag:

    C:\Program Files (x86)\Mozilla Firefox>dumpbin /headers firefox.exe
    ...
    FILE HEADER VALUES
                14C machine (x86)
    ...
                122 characteristics
                      Executable
                      Application can handle large (>2GB) addresses <--
                      32 bit word machine
    ...

    (You could probably actually modify the Firefox executable to unset that flag and stop it from using above 2GB of user memory, but I'm not sure what would happen or if there are other mechanisms that can overrule it or whatever.)

  245. 1980s all over again by deckardt · · Score: 1
  246. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

    How is a Blu-Ray drive outdated? Streaming has its uses but local content still delivers the highest video quality and will for some time to come; Netflix isn't ready to stream 30GB every time somebody watches a movie.

    There will surely be an update to the Blu-Ray standard for 4K content. Most likely it will be based on the already existing BDXL 100GB standard and the upcoming h.265 codec, and both the PS4 and the Xbox One will quietly include drives that can read BDXL and later get a software upgrade. They won't have hardware decode for h.265 but both consoles will have enough CPU power to do without.

  247. Re: I look forward to hearing about why this will by Specter · · Score: 1

    Actually they didn't. Like Microsoft 20 years later, IBM got dragged through the US's anti-trust system for years and in the end nothing happened.

  248. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by Slider451 · · Score: 1
    --
    Nostalgia isn't what it used to be.
  249. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by Specter · · Score: 1

    Its easy to build a very competent gaming rig for less than $500. Tom's Hardware has a regular feature about how to do it. Heck the $500 gaming PC I built more than five years ago still plays modern games with high graphics with only one graphics card upgrade in that time. And I still haven't even bothered to OC the CPU.

    I'm rebuilding one now that would have come in under $500 but I wanted a high efficiency totally silent PSU and so I splurged on that component, otherwise I was easily under $500.

  250. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by Slider451 · · Score: 1

    If you have an XBox 360, why go with something 359 releases out of date?

    One is just one point to the right of 360/0 on a compass...

    It's come full circle. That makes this release literally revolutionary!

    --
    Nostalgia isn't what it used to be.
  251. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by KZigurs · · Score: 1

    And XBox 360 was pretty much a mid-range unit, even at launch. Both consoles did all right, I'd say.

  252. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by dadelbunts · · Score: 1

    Yes and that was exactly my point. 500 dollars wont get you a gaming pc. Thanks for repeating it to me tho.

  253. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by rtb61 · · Score: 1

    Now for the XBox One which basically wants to be a PC with a M$ tax on every piece of hardware or software you attempt to attach to the device.

    --
    Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  254. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by HaZardman27 · · Score: 1

    Sure, but go look at the system requirements for Skyrim on PC. It requires 2GB of system memory, and 512MB of video memory. It recommends 4GB of system memory, and 1GB of video memory. Even if the PC version was identical to the 360 version in visual quality, there's no way you're going to get that to run on a PC with 512MB of memory shared between CPU and GPU. The 360 OS has a much smaller footprint than desktop Windows, and it's designed to allow developers to have lower level access to components.

    --
    Apparently wizard is not a legitimate career path, so I chose programmer instead.
  255. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by Slider451 · · Score: 1

    "good-enough" = "passable to play most games". I'd even say "plays most games very well for most people"
    Tom's also has a mid-tier and high-end system, which get you to your level of "good" for around $1,000. There's absolutely no need to pay more than that today.

    This coming from a guy who spent thousands every year in the 90s to keep a PC (ok, a home LAN of PCs) at the bleeding edge, because new games always pushed the performance envelope and took advantage of rapidly-advancing tech. Those days are gone. Since most games these days are ports of console titles designed for 1080p on legacy hardware you simply don't need to spend top dollar anymore to get an enjoyable gaming experience. There's nothing wrong with wanting more. Just acknowledge it for what it is: indulgence.

    --
    Nostalgia isn't what it used to be.
  256. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by s.petry · · Score: 1

    You make it sound like I'm some youngster that never did the same :P Goodie for me, cuz dang I feel old sometimes. I agree, a grand makes a good PC for gaming today. Long ago, my top gaming rig was closer to 4K.

    Still, we are doubling what the person said they spent for a gaming rig for a "good" gaming rig. I don't think I was wrong in my post, since I said Motherboard, Memory, CPU and graphics card for a "gaming" rig are 500 bucks alone. Add in the other items (disk, dvd/cd, sound card) and you are easily close to a grand.

    Some people do like to pay more, and to me that's their prerogative. I'm sure I could build a hell of a gaming rig for 3-5K, but why would I? Someone else may want to do what we did 1X - 2X years ago however, and build as big as they can for the cool factor. Hell, that's why we did it in reality.

    --

    -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

  257. Re:I look forward to hearing about why this will f by aralin · · Score: 1

    XBox One? So that makes the last one XBox 0.360? It did feel like alpha version. Anytime I came to my friends house and he proposed to play Xbox game, the console would not load it, it would crash or some other problem occured. I have not played a single XBox game to date for this reason...

    --
    If programs would be read like poetry, most programmers would be Vogons.