Slashdot Mirror


Slashdot and SourceForge Sold, Now Under New Management (bizx.info)

kodiaktau writes with a link to today's announcement that DHI Group, Inc. (which you might know better as Dice, the company that bought Slashdot and sister site SourceForge in 2012) today announced that it completed the sale of its Slashdot and SourceForge businesses (together referred to as 'Slashdot Media') to BIZX, LLC in a transaction that closed on January 27, 2016. Financial terms were not disclosed. DHI first announced its plan to sell Slashdot Media in July 2015 as part of its strategy to focus on its core brands, as Slashdot Media no longer fits within the Company's core strategic initiatives. KeyBanc Capital Markets Inc. served as the Company's exclusive financial advisor for the transaction. (FOSS Force has a short article with some more info BIZX and the sale.)

938 of 1,310 comments (clear)

  1. Meet the new boss by tpjunkie · · Score: 5, Insightful

    same as the old boss

    1. Re: Meet the new boss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      We won't get confirmation until we see this story in the front page again in a couple of days.

    2. Re: Meet the new boss by smittyoneeach · · Score: 2

      Speaking of confirmation, where is Netcraft with the obituary?

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    3. Re: Meet the new boss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Won't happen for this story.
      Notice it's released late Thursday night? They're probably hoping as few people as possible know about it.

      When corporations (or politicians, but what's the difference?) want maximum publicity, they release news on a Sunday.
      When they want to bury something, they release it late Thursday / Friday.

    4. Re:Meet the new boss by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      You can tell the difference. One smells like rotten meat and the other smells like rotten eggs.

    5. Re:Meet the new boss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      same as the old boss

      I would like to take this opportunity to welcome our new editorial overlords.

    6. Re:Meet the new boss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Well, for one, welcome our new overlords, and remind them as a trusted anonymous personality, I can be useful to them in their underground sugar mines.

    7. Re: Meet the new boss by Noah+Haders · · Score: 2

      no. when they want to bury it, they release it on friday afternoon. ive never heard anybody say that thurs is bad. is weds also bad, and tues and mon? which days are no longer bad?

    8. Re:Meet the new boss by penguinoid · · Score: 2

      same as the old boss

      It might take them more than a day to fix things up. Though I would like to hear what their plans for the site are.

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    9. Re: Meet the new boss by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      If they really want to bury news they release it when something big has happened. And then in a small note that's not on the economy pages.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    10. Re:Meet the new boss by hambone142 · · Score: 2

      Oh no.

      Some more "managers" that will "improve" something and drive it in to the ground.

    11. Re:Meet the new boss by whipslash · · Score: 2

      You're right. It will take some time. We've owned the site less than 24 hours so we're not going to jump to any rash decisions. But first things first we're going to fix a lot of the broken stuff.

    12. Re:Meet the new boss by BronsCon · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Does this mean Unicode support? Or, to put it another way, you're going to rewrite from scratch because it's completely broken?

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    13. Re:Meet the new boss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I dunno... the old boss left a pretty low bar. I'm pretty optimistic myself

    14. Re:Meet the new boss by serviscope_minor · · Score: 3, Informative

      Whatever you don't "fix" classic by removing it!

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    15. Re:Meet the new boss by AmiMoJo · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It only took Soylent News a few weeks to implement working Unicode support. Apparently the code supports it, but most characters are filtered to prevent trolling. Back in the early days people would do things like post long strings to widen the page, or use Unicode characters to reverse text flow direction and the like. I'm not exactly sure what Soylent did to prevent that but they seem to have it sorted out.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    16. Re: Meet the new boss by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Dunno about Netcraft, but if it's on Forbes Ethan will link to it.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    17. Re:Meet the new boss by Rei · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yes please! Check out my sig, this has been a really annoying issue for quite some time. Also, please encode in UTF-8 if you can. UTF-16 is dangerous - namely because the vast majority of characters are only two bytes, but in rare cases they're four, so these cases usually slip past testing; often even libraries are broken in UTF-16, let alone individual programs, when it comes to 4-byte characters.

      Other things to keep in mind:

        * This is a site of nerds, so if someone posts a small chunk of code, it should display properly. Don't go all crazy on trying to "parse" and "prettify" posted text.

        * For your sake, don't make the site vulnerable to injection (aka, *never* just paste a string from a user into one used internally). This is, again, a site full of nerds; they'll notice. And the less scrupulous will take advantage of it. Don't write your own sanitization functions, use internal library functions - preferably parameter binding and the such. And don't forget that injection is not just about SQL, it can affect any user string inserted into another that subsequently goes through a parser - there's XML injection, HTML injection, BASH injection, and so forth.

      * If there's some coding project that you think would help the site but you don't have the resources to do it, turn to your readers. For example, if the site was being hit by spam bots in the comments or whatnot, I'm sure you could get more than a few volunteers who would contribute code if it means not having to read the spam.

      * People screw up, that's normal. If you accidentally post a duplicate, just take it off the front page. You don't have to delete the comments (you could even put it back on firehose), but just try to keep the front page duplicate free.

      * I'm not a big "oh, this site is inherently bad!" person, but a lot of people are, and they get angry when they see links to articles on certain sites (such as, for example, Forbes, due to their adblocker policy and malware history). Be aware of what sites are unpopular and try to avoid linking them, if you can. Most news is available from multiple outlets.

      If you do this sort of stuff, people here will be very happy :)

      --
      What the hells goin on in the engine room? Were there monkeys? Some terrifying space monkeys maybe got loose?
    18. Re: Meet the new boss by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Funny

      Don't worry. This is Slashdot. The dupe is due for about Sunday.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    19. Re:Meet the new boss by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      They firmly believe that Slashdot needs to be redesigned to be more like facebook.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    20. Re:Meet the new boss by vtcodger · · Score: 1

      "Though I would like to hear what their plans for the site are."

      Plans? Why do you assume plans? For all you and I know, this is just ivy league MBAs shuffling properties with little or no knowledge of what the properties are.

      --
      You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
    21. Re: Meet the new boss by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's been a real sore spot how Slashdot "Inc." has itself been a poor player in the OSS world. Soylent's Slashcode is already the good one and they haven't stolen this community. Network effects, maybe, but also management style, even if you hate to admit it.

      Time to sync up and send pull requests.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    22. Re:Meet the new boss by guises · · Score: 1

      Is there some basis to be saying this, or are you just trolling for karma?

      A quick search for BIZX wasn't very informative - could you elaborate? In what way are they the same as the old boss?

    23. Re:Meet the new boss by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      You _have_ been reading your Terry Pratchett.

      It's time for the Glorious Revolution of the People's Republic of Treacle Mine Road!

    24. Re: Meet the new boss by arth1 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Well, the new owner's main slogan is "We help Advertisers reach the right Consumer".

      They may have a harder time with that here, though. I doubt they will find a lot of capital C consumers here.

      So, over to something more interesting. There's talks of staff being shown the door. Any idea who, yet? Do they get to train replacements that will actually do the needful?

    25. Re:Meet the new boss by arth1 · · Score: 1

      * People screw up, that's normal. If you accidentally post a duplicate, just take it off the front page. You don't have to delete the comments (you could even put it back on firehose), but just try to keep the front page duplicate free.

      Not only don't they have to delete the comments, it's imperative that they don't delete. Slashdot has survived in large part because of a policy of not deleting except when explicitly required by law.

      If users start seeing their (or their foe's) posts deleted, they'll be gone.

    26. Re: Meet the new boss by edittard · · Score: 1

      There's talks of staff being shown the door.

      Is that because they couldn't find it unaided?

      --
      At the bottom of the /. main page it says 'Yesterday's News'. Well they got that right.
    27. Re: Meet the new boss by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 1

      We won't get confirmation until we see this story in the front page again in a couple of days.

      A couple of days? Hell, it's down to 4-5 hours at this point.

    28. Re:Meet the new boss by beowulfcluster · · Score: 1

      First priority is going to be to make everyone log in by using their Facebook accounts, isn't it? That will be lovely!

    29. Re:Meet the new boss by mvdwege · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah, but on the other hand it took SN only a few months to completely degrade into Breitbart-level rightwing kookery.

      Ok, ok, that's hyperbolic, but it's a lot worse than Slashdot. Here at least there is a sizable contingent of people still willing to challenge the reactionary rhetoric.

      --
      "I know I will be modded down for this": where's the option '-1, Asking for it'?
    30. Re:Meet the new boss by houghi · · Score: 1

      On the one hand, rewriting would solve a lot. OTOH, you can then only pray they keep the good things, like not just one big list of responses one after another, but something that looks like Usenet.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    31. Re:Meet the new boss by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      Though I would like to hear what their plans for the site are.

      Leverage their synergies to increasingly monetize the user experience while pretending to provide a platform providing interesting content while using unskilled editors to shill for various products, increase their exposure through emerging analytics, and generally fail to understand who the actual readership is ... as exemplified by the new feature section on hair and makeup, as well as the "Ask an MBA" advice column.

      Their plans are like any company who buys another company ... to make some more fucking money.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    32. Re: Meet the new boss by paiute · · Score: 1

      Speaking of confirmation, where is Netcraft with the obituary?

      Netcraft is melting down in a masturbatory Diet-Coke-and-Mentos display of packet-switched sizzling ejaculate on the news that iPhone sales are slowing.

      --
      If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
    33. Re:Meet the new boss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It is just so unfathomably complicated to restrict unicode to a specific subset of characters right? I can definitely see why that would take weeks and/or never get done.

    34. Re: Meet the new boss by nukenerd · · Score: 1

      Well, the new owner's main slogan is "We help Advertisers reach the right Consumer".

      So there will be no adverts here any more? Not that I see any adverts here anyway, so I suppose they have got it right for me already as I am definitely the wrong consumer.

    35. Re:Meet the new boss by mysidia · · Score: 1

      Maybe. Maybe not. The fact they didn't replace the frontpage with a Goatse image or redirect to some other website upon completion.... is reassuring.

    36. Re:Meet the new boss by tpjunkie · · Score: 1

      I just doubt much in the way of the content is going to change significantly - the slashvertisements, the bitching and moaning about the relevance of the posts. It'll probably just be business as usual.

    37. Re:Meet the new boss by tepples · · Score: 1

      Kuro5hin also went quite political when it split off from Slashdot. In any case, if there's too much wingnuttery, you could always submit some well-written center and left stories to try to balance it out. Or have you tried doing so? If so, what was the response?

    38. Re:Meet the new boss by tepples · · Score: 1

      Then perhaps Slashdot could adopt Stack Overflow's policy of treating duplicates: keep them around, but deemphasize them in the user interface, treat them as signposts to the original story, and provide links back and forth between an original story and its dupes or updates.

    39. Re:Meet the new boss by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      I'm not positive but I think the new owners might have some regulars in the management team. I was seeing posts earlier by people with lower ids than i have making assertive statements about what will not change as if they had the abilities to control it. The one i liked best was about the beta never being implemented.

    40. Re: Meet the new boss by omnichad · · Score: 1

      They may have a harder time with that here, though. I doubt they will find a lot of capital C consumers here.

      That was exactly my thought when reading this quote:

      Slashdot Media no longer fits within the Company's core strategic initiatives

      I'm pretty sure that's just a fancy way of saying that Slashvertisements do not work.

    41. Re:Meet the new boss by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      They should keep politics out of the news stories except for when it touches tech or your rights online. I never did like the politics section when it was originally introduced to cover a US election and I still don't think it is wise. If the take away from any discussion here is "those evil conservatives " or "those hippie liberals " instead of we do or do not want backdoors in encryption or whatever the story is about, i think it's just a waste here.

    42. Re: Meet the new boss by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

      If it means they bring back demographic targeted ads instead of "This is what you searched for on facebook" ads, I'm all for it.

      I used to buy a lot of stuff from slashdot ads because they targeted the right demographic without stalking me.

    43. Re: Meet the new boss by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      They used the term synergy!
      Where boned.

      Actually Slashdot is a tough nut to crack.
      On the plus side.
      1. It still has a good community probably one of the best.
      2. The moderation system works better than most other systems I have seen. Far from perfect but it seems to keep the manure level down.
      3. Really valuable demographics.

      The problem is.
      1. They hate ads.
      2. They are using adblockers.
      3. They really don't want to pay.

      So how do you make money?
      You need money to pay for servers and developers but people really want free. I hate the paid posts and the ads used to be too in your face. It is a shame because I do not mind seeing ads as long as they do not take up too much space, are about things I care about, and ARE NOT ANIMATED AND ARE SILENT!

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    44. Re:Meet the new boss by vel-ex-tech · · Score: 1

      NotDrWho is merely responding to the recent hate that's been aimed at anyone assigned the male gender at birth in a tech career.

      I sit in a fairly unique position in this cycle of hate. On the one hand, we have the gaslighting asshole managers who really are firing women because they really do think that women should not be programmers. So, people like you observe that and want to do something about it.

      So, you decide to open fire on anybody working as the male gender in tech. You openly attack on me, NotDrWho, and everybody else caught up in this cycle of hate. You don't go after the asshole managers; you go after the people on the ground who previously had no problem with co-workers who were women, trans, or homosexual or any combination thereof.

      What's their reaction? Open fire on trans women and homosexuals, because deep down they've always hated us but were able to tolerate us. I was already under fire from Michgan TERFs, TYVM.

      End result: my regular doctor is 150 miles away. Thanks, asshole SJWs, asshole anti-SJWs, asshole Michigan Feminists, and asshole Michigan lesbians.

      No, real end result: I could have completed transition 14 years ago and would be living in deep stealth today with a vastly better quality of life if I knew what I know today. Instead you asshole SJWs, anti-SJWs, Michigan Feminists, and Michigan lesbians convinced me that I would not be able to work as the gender I am anywhere. It turns out you are all nothing but liars.

      So I'm going to ask you to please kill yourself.

    45. Re:Meet the new boss by NotDrWho · · Score: 1

      Sadly, fascism is a potential problem on BOTH sides these days. It's just a question of what ideology they want to impose on us by force.

      And the Christian bible-thumpers on the right don't scare me nearly as much as the Muslim-apologists on the left. I can deal with some douchebag bible-thumper yelling shit outside an abortion clinic a lot better than I can deal with some insane fuckwads who want to impose Sharia Law by force on every country in the world (and the SJW's who, bizarrely, apologize for them). In the 21st century, bible-thumpers don't generally blow shit up for their religion anymore or cut people's heads off for disagreeing with them. Koran-thumpers still do that--openly and with overt government sanction in mainstream Muslim countries like Saudi Arabia and Iran. And SJW's in Europe are inviting them in, then trying to cover it up when (surprise, surprise) they bring their medieval religious beliefs and attitudes with them.

      --
      SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    46. Re:Meet the new boss by tkrotchko · · Score: 1

      "Back in the early days people would do things like post long strings to widen the page, or use Unicode characters to reverse text flow direction and the like"

      a.k.a. "The Good Old Days".

      --
      You were mistaken. Which is odd, since memory shouldn't be a problem for you
    47. Re:Meet the new boss by NotDrWho · · Score: 1

      Oh, and with regard to "the left's desire to treat people better" I would have no problem with that if it were true (what sane person would object to people treating each other better?). The problem that I have is that the SJW's who are infecting the left are warping "Let's all treat each other with respect and equality" into "All white male heterosexuals are evil!!!" I'm pretty sure that flipping the script on who gets oppressed and demonized wasn't what Martin Luther King, Jr. had in mind during those marches for equality.

      --
      SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    48. Re: Meet the new boss by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      Then they fucked it up, because Friday or Saturday is when you 'take out the trash' in mediaspeak. The 800+ comments would agree with me.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    49. Re:Meet the new boss by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      And there's nothing wrong with beta. The beta we got from Dice was horrid, but that doesn't mean betas in general are. If they stick to the operational specs, minus the few things we're complaining about, and keep the same look and feel, with the few commonly requested tweaks (e.g. reversions to the pre-Dice design), beta should literally just be a "make sure it works right" proposition that can then be used to test incremental changes out on the general community (who volunteer to use it) before broader release. Provided our new masters listen to us, which it looks like they're set to do, it can work without ending up like Dice beta, which was the result of, seemingly, doing the opposite of what we said we wanted.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    50. Re: Meet the new boss by Cylix · · Score: 1

      In fairness, they did drop the tech slant and posted general fluff in order to make a wider appeal to slashvertisements.

      If that isn't a monetization strategy I don't know what is!

      It had the tiny (oh so small) side effect of alienating the user base they purchased. I'm sure all those hardcore fans would have been replaced with a more general consuming consumer eventually. If only there had been more time!

      --
      "You should always go to other people's funerals; otherwise, they won't come to yours." -- Yogi Berra
    51. Re:Meet the new boss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Ok, ok, that's hyperbolic, but it's a lot worse than Slashdot. Here at least there is a sizable contingent of people still willing to challenge the reactionary rhetoric.

      As someone who thinks of himself as an anti-kook my experience at soylent is that there are a handful of reliable right-wing kooks (buzzard, jdavidb, runaway1969, etc) but even more alt-right gamergater types (vanderhoth, kuronei, VLM, etc). And they tend to post early so their crazy is easily noticed and gets up-modded by their fellow travelers. But if a story has been up long enough sanity tends to settle in. Maybe not enough to down-mod the idiocy into the ground, but enough to get highly visible counter-points.

    52. Re: Meet the new boss by westlake · · Score: 1

      They may have a harder time with that here, though. I doubt they will find a lot of capital C consumers here.

      You have got to be kidding me. The geek has an insatiable appetite for pop culture. ThinkGeek, This Is Why I'm Broke

    53. Re:Meet the new boss by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      We don't need unicode. It's not worth the hassle. Just pretend you're typing on a terminal.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    54. Re:Meet the new boss by Rei · · Score: 1

      Like the "mu" character that disappeared from the article about 3d printers today, leaving to lots of confusion in the comments?

      --
      What the hells goin on in the engine room? Were there monkeys? Some terrifying space monkeys maybe got loose?
    55. Re:Meet the new boss by Rei · · Score: 1

      Indeed, that's what I was recommending. Take it off the front page, but that doesn't mean that the comments need to be deleted. It just means that new people coming to the site aren't going to be bothered with a dupe.

      --
      What the hells goin on in the engine room? Were there monkeys? Some terrifying space monkeys maybe got loose?
    56. Re:Meet the new boss by adler187 · · Score: 1

      Also, please encode in UTF-8 if you can. UTF-16 is dangerous - namely because the vast majority of characters are only two bytes, but in rare cases they're four ...

      Even that is not quite correct. The vast majority of Unicode code points are only two bytes (in UTF-16), but in rare cases (everything outside the Basic Multilingual Plane, which is actually significantly more code points than inside the BMP) they're encoded in two, two-byte code units (4 bytes).

      Remember these aren't "characters" but code points. There's also combining characters, eg. U+0065 U+0301 which gives an e with an accent. The grapheme (character) is formed from two Unicode code points and encoded in UTF-16 takes 4 bytes. There are others that take more: U+0065 U+0302 U+0301 is an e with two accents used in Vietnamese and would take 6 bytes in UTF-16. There's also Han unification and probably other things I'm forgetting or don't know.
      Unicode is a tricky beast. There's lots of stuff there and lots of ways to get it wrong. I would agree that UTF-8 is the best encoding to use for compatibility with ASCII, no endian issues, and it doesn't assume all code points fit in one code unit.

    57. Re:Meet the new boss by c · · Score: 1

      I'm not a big "oh, this site is inherently bad!" person, but a lot of people are, and they get angry when they see links to articles on certain sites (such as, for example, Forbes, due to their adblocker policy and malware history). Be aware of what sites are unpopular and try to avoid linking them, if you can. Most news is available from multiple outlets.

      This is a big one. Pay attention to the comments. The fact that these sites keep coming back, in spite of being repeatedly called out by up-modded comments, strongly suggests that nobody on staff is even paying attention to the comments. Or sharing information with each other. Or... anything.

      Personally, I'd just make these corporate submitters pay, and flag them as sponsored content.

      --
      Log in or piss off.
    58. Re:Meet the new boss by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      Just gotta spell it out then. Such is life. This is a text forum.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    59. Re:Meet the new boss by zenbi · · Score: 1

      Best of luck on your new project!

      Any interest in a data federation protocol? Would be really neat to have a Usenet-like distributed network with slash-style comments. Perhaps reunite some of the branching of the slash community that occurred after the beta fiasco.

    60. Re:Meet the new boss by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      I often feel like the "Left" and "Right" sounds little more than the argument as to whether hungry slaves or well fed slaves produce better results.

      Both sides are conservative, they just don't agree on which path will best conserve their power into the future.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    61. Re:Meet the new boss by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      While true, I doubt Unicode support is to blame :-)

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    62. Re:Meet the new boss by sootman · · Score: 1

      > Other things to keep in mind:
      > *

      One more -- fucking render <UL>s.

      And then, check out my sig. :-)

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    63. Re: Meet the new boss by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      I have not seen any pop-over ads on slashdot.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    64. Re: Meet the new boss by arth1 · · Score: 1

      The geek has an insatiable appetite for pop culture.

      Geeks bite the head of frogs at freak shows and follow the latest fads.
      Nerds are more concerned about how to get a replacement RLL drive or what kind of lubricant is best for slide rules when used underwater.

    65. Re:Meet the new boss by Lotana · · Score: 1

      This is an American site. In the United Stated both left and right would be considered mid to extreme right in the European political stances.

    66. Re: Meet the new boss by smittyoneeach · · Score: 1

      That was about three times the necessary amount of imagery.

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    67. Re:Meet the new boss by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      *Wow* I hadn't checked out SN in a while, but yeah... that's not a site I want to spend much time on. (Even if it didn't have such a hideous eye-bleeding colors.)

    68. Re: Meet the new boss by Ibiwan · · Score: 1

      We can only hope

      --
      -- //no comment
    69. Re:Meet the new boss by CrowdedBrainzzzsand9 · · Score: 1

      This is what you need to do: 1. add a 'room' concept for special interests (after hiring me to implement it). --the Radio Shack Computer Room --the COBOL GISTs Forum --the Reality TV Geeks in the Forest room. 2. The SlashStarter Room: it's like KickStarter, but is exclusively for /. salary (so that there will be some). 3. The What to Do If Trump Wins Room: Mom say I have to go to bed now, so I'll explain this during home room tomorrow.

    70. Re:Meet the new boss by DG · · Score: 1

      No.

      John Katz.

      --
      Want to learn about race cars? Read my Book
    71. Re:Meet the new boss by PReDiToR · · Score: 1

      Reassuring, yet I'd have literally pissed myself laughing and had a GREAT deal of admiration for them if they had!

      --

      Do not meddle in the affairs of geeks for they are subtle and quick to anger
    72. Re: Meet the new boss by DedTV · · Score: 1

      Again, take a look at sites already under the new owners' umbrella. You'll quickly realize you should have added a "yet" to your comment.

    73. Re:Meet the new boss by doccus · · Score: 1

      You're right. It will take some time. We've owned the site less than 24 hours so we're not going to jump to any rash decisions. But first things first we're going to fix a lot of the broken stuff.

      If this is really the new boss speaking, just the fact that you're participating in the forum is a Good Sign... Also, there's a lot of old timers here with extremely good advice too, that's so far been pretty much ignored. It's a good resource though, so don't overlook it.
      Welcome.

    74. Re:Meet the new boss by whipslash · · Score: 1

      This is really the "new boss"/steward. Check the earlier confirmation of my tweet @loganabbott. I'd post the link again but I'm on mobile. I've got a big doc with all your suggestions and we'll do a story this week to collect more feedback. Rest assured we're listening

    75. Re: Meet the new boss by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Well then I guess it will be adblockers or I will be gone. I miss the old slashdot and the community is still one of the better ones but life is too short to put up with crap much longer.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    76. Re:Meet the new boss by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      This is why I stopped going a few months back. I'm fairly traditionally right-wing (i.e. not extreme), but the commentary and editorializing over there eventually took things so far to the extreme (in both directions) that you couldn't have a reasonable discussion.

      Any mention of taxes or large corporations would derail into a shouting match between the types of folks who insist that all taxation is "government theft" and those who think that corporations in the West are broken and that companies as large as Apple or Microsoft should be broken up and have their wealth redistributed to the poor.

      With everything derailing so easily and so quickly at the slightest mention of topics that most people would consider mundane and settled, there was little room for reasoned debate. I'm fine with a few loonies, but the whole conversation just went down those lines, every single time, and the upmodding made it clear that that's where the groupthink was for the site too. I eventually just gave up.

    77. Re:Meet the new boss by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      Given all the hoops and the security hassles and the extra things you pointed out that you have to worry about for unicode support, it sounds like unicode support might not be worth the extra hassle and danger.

  2. Take back Slashdot by H_Fisher · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I really, really hope this is good news. I miss the actual "News for nerds" ethos that brought me here, and I've waded through a lot of sponsored "posts" and clickbait to sift out the kernels of actual news that remain.

    New /. overlords? Get this site back to "News for nerds" and news that matters, and you'll keep me here.

    1. Re:Take back Slashdot by whipslash · · Score: 5, Informative

      We're going to do our best to keep/bring back that "news for nerds" ethos and hopefully keep you here.

    2. Re:Take back Slashdot by ChrisKnight · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Please, please, please... No more Bennett Haselton monologs!

      --
      -- This sig is only a test. If this were a real sig it would say something witty. --
    3. Re:Take back Slashdot by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I don't believe it. Is Slashdot going to stop those ridiculous paid links to forbes.com? What about the relentless left-wing social justice stories that blame nerds for everything wrong in the world? What about constant news-today-gone-tomorrow political stories that are general news, at best? I don't see any of those going away under any kind of new management. Irritating as fuck content has been around since the Jon Katz stories wouldn't stop appearing.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    4. Re:Take back Slashdot by Loconut1389 · · Score: 2

      I loved Slashdot in the early 2000's.. I ended up working at Dice after they bought slashdot. I thought that was cool though I'm not on that project so it doesn't exist to me- it's not even in our office.. I wish all of slashdot media (sourceforge) had prospered better under dice.

    5. Re:Take back Slashdot by Bite+The+Pillow · · Score: 1

      It is good news, regardless of whether it is better. A business took over a free site and fucked it up, now a business gets to learn anew how nit to fuck it up. They have financial incentives to ignore the fuckery of dashslot.

      Or, give up and go to soylent news. I insult fucktards here, k only read there. If you think I'm some sort of overzealous tyrannical dicksmooch, you won't me posting there. Until fucktards register there, so don't be a fucktard while posting.

      Also, fuck you autocorrect.

    6. Re:Take back Slashdot by nine-times · · Score: 1

      As disappointed as I've been about Slashdot's turn towards some spammy content, I was even more disappointed by SourceForge. The site that had been a trusted source for FOSS started bundling spyware in the installers they distributed.

      Hopefully this is a good sign.

    7. Re:Take back Slashdot by whipslash · · Score: 5, Informative

      Noted.

    8. Re:Take back Slashdot by PopeRatzo · · Score: 3

      I just want to say that I've always liked you, whipslash. I like the cut of your jib.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    9. Re:Take back Slashdot by whipslash · · Score: 1

      Feeling's mutual my friend

    10. Re:Take back Slashdot by whipslash · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The deal closed less than 24 hours ago. We're going to look at all options in order to improve the experience. And, no, that doesn't mean we're going to roll out a crappy new interface without listening to user feedback. We want to make sure we get it right.

    11. Re:Take back Slashdot by whipslash · · Score: 3, Informative

      Just answering questions as I see them. We're not weighing our future decisions based on the anger level of the person who suggested them.

    12. Re:Take back Slashdot by whipslash · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Hopefully it'll prosper now. We have a good team in place and we're listening to you guys.

    13. Re:Take back Slashdot by lucm · · Score: 4, Informative

      What about the relentless left-wing social justice stories that blame nerds for everything wrong in the world?

      I would like to point out something. In many SJW situations the perpetrators enjoyed their 15 minutes of fame but later paid dearly.

      Examples:
      -Adria Richards (the PyCon Donglegate photo and tweet): after getting fired from Sendgrid during that incident she didn't find another job. Almost 3 years already.

      -Jerelyn Luther (the shrieking bitch who screamed at a Yale teacher because he didn't agree with the "no offensive costume" policy of Yale): she closed all her online accounts, and her own mom removed her name from her company website...

      In those cases the aftermath is a lot worse for the SJW than for the people they "shamed".

      I strongly recommend Jon Ronson book about public shaming, it's fascinating.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    14. Re:Take back Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Please fuck off. Slashdot is not Slashdot without the AC. There is no need for stupid reddit-ish "EDIT: Blahblahblah" bullshit. Say it right the first time your reply to your own post. Are you trolling?

    15. Re:Take back Slashdot by jeffb+(2.718) · · Score: 1

      FWIW, I was typing my reply while yours went up, and it wasn't meant as a response to yours.

      My hackles go up a bit whenever I see posters foaming about "SJW" or variants thereon. Naturally, that means my hackles are up a good bit of the time when I'm reading here. Doesn't mean I want those posts deleted, though, or the subjects avoided; my "back" button works just fine.

      Thanks for coming and listening in the thread. I wish you and your team luck, for reasons both selfish and selfless.

    16. Re:Take back Slashdot by narcc · · Score: 5, Funny

      we're listening to you guys.

      Now I know Slashdot is in trouble...

    17. Re:Take back Slashdot by shanen · · Score: 1

      Basically ditto on sourceforge regarding my comment (below) about the financial models that have not worked for slashdot. I long ago concluded that sourceforge was most often the place that good ideas go to die. Full of orphaned or half-finished products. In most cases the programmers lost interest or decided they weren't going to strike it rich after all, but I think the cases involving competent programmers usually died simply because they found better things to do with their time.

      With my proposed charity-shares project-based approach, the project proposal should include ALL of the necessary resources, which includes the people who are willing to work on the project for the amount that is budgeted for their work, and the schedule and testing won't be ignored because the potential donors can see up front what the plan is, at least roughly.

      However, to my way of thinking, the most important aspect is the success criteria that should be included in the project proposal. Not so much for the current project, because once enough donors have agreed and the money is released, then there's not much you can do. For the FUTURE projects, especially projects involving members of that first project...

      --
      Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
    18. Re: Take back Slashdot by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Please, cut back on the "everyone in your industry are chauvenists assholes and you owe us a place in your ranks" crap?

      We don't need shit and abuse in our leisure time, we get enough on the job.

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    19. Re:Take back Slashdot by whipslash · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well alright then.

    20. Re:Take back Slashdot by whipslash · · Score: 1

      We're getting rid of the bundled software on SourceForge ASAP.

    21. Re:Take back Slashdot by sexconker · · Score: 2

      How about returning Slashdot to what it was supposed to be? Items posted to the firehose that get voted up enough make it to the front page, not things that are picked by "editors" or paid for by other sites.

    22. Re:Take back Slashdot by TWX · · Score: 5, Insightful

      We're going to do our best to keep/bring back that "news for nerds" ethos and hopefully keep you here.

      I do have one suggestion, since you appear to be participating... Please take care with the distinction between nerd stuff and fandom. The two have a lot of overlap, but at the moment fandom is seeing a popular resurgence that takes it far away from nerdy subjects. It can be fun, but part of the reason that Slashdot became successful in the first place was that it catered to a subculture rather than catering entirely to mainstream culture.

      There is a limit on the size that something can grow when it doesn't embrace mainstream culture, but entities that attempt to make that transition usually falter as they alienate their subculture userbase far faster than they attract mainstream participation. That may mean that Slashdot and other sites like it have an upper bound, but it's better than closing up shop.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    23. Re:Take back Slashdot by yoshi_mon · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Part of what I view what has happened with Slashdot, and it is not alone, is that forums are everywhere today. And not just forums but all sorts of different takes on the genre.

      I'm going to say some pretty obvious things but back when I 1st discovered the site there was no Facebook or some means of having a forum type discussion on every website. (I honestly don't remember when I 1st made this login but it was a long time ago now. Rob still had links to his favorite sites as part of the content.) So having not only having a forum that was dedicated to "News for Nerds" that also incorporated a system that tried, oh how it has tried over the years, to self moderate the comments was a pretty unique thing.

      And while /. still is somewhat unique in its moderation system there are so many options for people these days who want to express their viewpoint that it is tough to point to anything that /. might have as a strong draw. I say that also with the idea in mind that so many people prefer to live in their own echo chamber such that they are not often look for an educated discussion, rather just a way to be a part of their flavor of groupthink. (And /. has been guilty of that as well of course.)

      I don't envy you the challenge of keeping /. relevant and something that will not just be a money sink. It would take way more thought than I wish to do here this late at night. (I was hoping that this post would come earlier when the news broke on the web but cest la vie.) However I will say that I will be keeping a close eye on what the direction of the overall site. Especially things like G+ trying to force me to disclose personal information or any thing like that. The very moment I get a bad vibe from the site or the direction I think that it is going I'll add slashdot.org localhost to my hosts file and that will be that.

      Not trying to come across as combative but I felt the need to say as there has been a strong push by many corporations to monetize every part of their IP/data/etc. And I'm not looking for some promise of how exactly you will make /. something other than a money sink. That is for you to figure out...ethically.

      --

      Really, I know what I'm doing...Ohhhh, look at the shiny buttons!
    24. Re:Take back Slashdot by unity · · Score: 1

      Seconded.

    25. Re: Take back Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You've already commented more in this thread then the previous mods did in a year. Well done.

    26. Re:Take back Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      My suggestion is to look at the posting history of people who make suggestions while logged in, so you'll see when they're nutters who need to be ignored. QED.

      AC's dont want to make a reputation for themselves, so they can be judged on their own merits.

    27. Re:Take back Slashdot by alvinrod · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'd disagree. The case for anonymous speech is well established and with Slashdot's default method of displaying comments, you won't see AC posts unless they've been moderated positively a few times. Also, there are plenty of people who don't want an account for whatever reason and the occasional inane troll (that is typically modded to -1 in a few minutes) isn't worth losing the random insightful AC post. You won't fix the problem either as the actual trolls will just create throwaway accounts.

      I can't say that allowing moderation and posting in the same article is a better idea either. There're enough articles that have become political and the people who have strong opinions on the positions they take shouldn't be allowed to mod in the same article. People get too emotionally involved and it will result in more bad moderation or abuse than potential good.

    28. Re:Take back Slashdot by whipslash · · Score: 1

      Thank you sir.

    29. Re:Take back Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      What about the relentless left-wing social justice stories that blame nerds for everything wrong in the world?

      They're still right where they always were - in the imaginations of insecure losers nursing persecution complexes.

    30. Re:Take back Slashdot by schnell · · Score: 5, Insightful

      So here's some unsolicited advice (yay!):

      Websites that change owners frequently pretty much scream "potentially valuable asset that nobody has figured out how to make money on!" Because if they did actually make money, they wouldn't be getting sold. So Slashdot is a pretty obvious money sink, but it does have a desirable reading audience, many of whom are absurdly vocal about how they don't want to read ads, subscribe or otherwise do anything that would, you know, make the site profitable.

      My advice? Focus on content quality - Slashdot could easily post 3x the stories it does today, and have better QA - just by maybe hiring someone with some journalism credentials rather than making the people who write the back end server code pretend to be editors. Improve the quality and make it "must read" material that people are willing to pay for. And try encouraging some writers to create original content - not BS video interviews with talking heads from sponsors, but actual longform journalism. If Slashdot is actually a good enough read, you can monetize a subscription tier that echoes "Slate Plus," "ESPN Insider," etc.

      In Slashdot's "glory days," it didn't have a lot of competition. There was no Gawker/Gizmodo/iO9/whatever to read about the coolest Star Wars prequel rumors; people came to Slashdot for that. Even though there's a lot of competition now, Slashdot (barely) hangs on to a superior virtue: a better quality of commenters and a better moderation system than other "nerd" sites. Slashdot was never very well managed, even back in the "CmdrTaco/Hemos Glory Days." Inject some QA into the story vetting/writing process and you'll see a resurgence of readership.

      Let me continue to beat this dead horse: all that Slashdot really has going for it is a (minority) smart readership and a superior comment rating system. Explore and improve that. Gamify the f--k out of Karma. Do profiles on crazy frequent Slashdot contributors (not Bennett Hasleton) and let them have a real name and a voice. More badges, go back to numerical representations of karma, give higher upmods to really good contributors, whatever. Reward posters that get a lot of up- or down-mods because they're usually saying something interesting one way or another, even if they're being mod-bombed by ideologues. Reward longer posts. Finally introduce a "-1, Factually Incorrect" mod. This mod system is your real asset - pay some attention to it, which hasn't been done in many many years.

      Thank you for showing up to answer questions. Please continue to be engaged. Slashdot has always shown an astonishing lack of self-awareness! Why were there thousands of off-topic posts about how much Beta sucked and why? Because Slashdot's editors didn't even think through the idea that people have opinions of their product enough to introduce a way for people to have meta-discussions about Slashdot. When your readers/commenters are the "product" to your advertisers, how do you not give them a place to comment/vent/respond about Slashdot itself? In the 15+ years I have read this site, I don't remember a single post from "management" saying "how are we doing? comment here." That's just either willful disregard of feedback or idiocy. And seriously, the site itself gets sold, and the post about it is when somebody else submits a link? YOU DON'T THINK THAT'S SOMETHING YOU COULD HAVE ANNOUNCED YOURSELVES? I mean, WTF?

      Lastly, please just be open. What's working, what's not. I think people would be willing to turn off ad blockers or pay for Slashdot if someone in charge just said, "Hey, we lose money on this site. We need help. How are you willing to support us? Do you want to donate (a la Wikipedia) in exchange for having ads turned off? Would you be willing to subscribe? Can we do more ads if they follow a certain vetting process?"

      It's sad to admit this, but Slashdot has been my "home page" since at least 1999. I'd hate to see it go away, and I'd love to keep it alive and healthy, as long as it's worth keeping.

      --
      "95% of all Slashdot .sig quotes are incorrect or completely fabricated." -Benjamin Franklin
    31. Re:Take back Slashdot by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Could you get feedback from us "veterans" that have been reading /. for the past, say, 15 years?

      i.e. Some of the things I'd like to see fixed:

      - Unicode support
      - Fix the broken "lameness filter" -- You can't even post a reasonable length of code with it, nor provide a list of bullet points with short sentences.
      - No more StartsWithAShill and other trolls
      - Allow older accounts who have good standing being able to post faster. The 4 minute time-out is archaic compared to reddit

    32. Re: Take back Slashdot by whipslash · · Score: 1

      Thanks!

    33. Re:Take back Slashdot by sumdumass · · Score: 4, Insightful

      ACs also don't want to be mass down moderated just because someone had to be the adult in the room and state the obvious or wanted to play devil's advocate in order to explore different ends of a position.

      If that annoys you, I suggest you get over it else face a boring echo chamber.

    34. Re:Take back Slashdot by AuMatar · · Score: 4, Informative

      No, it was never supposed to be that way. Firehose itself is pretty new, an attempt to turn slashdot into Digg. Get rid of it, and only put up highly technical articles like in the actual good old days,

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    35. Re: Take back Slashdot by Cylix · · Score: 1

      When they did it was the poorest excuses. "We thought it was funny..." In response to basically posting stock ads.

      If you are going to sale your integrity at least get more then a nickel.

      --
      "You should always go to other people's funerals; otherwise, they won't come to yours." -- Yogi Berra
    36. Re: Take back Slashdot by epyT-R · · Score: 2

      +1 Politically Incorrect Truth

    37. Re:Take back Slashdot by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      I would argue the opposite. Let anons post more frequently. Those who want a groupthink echo chamber can still use the filter.

    38. Re:Take back Slashdot by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      In other words, you wanted to passive aggressively threaten to leave if they don't filter such posts. Got it.

    39. Re:Take back Slashdot by epyT-R · · Score: 2

      You meant progress and social justice or 'progress' and 'social justice'?

    40. Re:Take back Slashdot by gangien · · Score: 4, Funny

      You guys should hire Jon Katz.

    41. Re:Take back Slashdot by jeffb+(2.718) · · Score: 1

      Wow, really? I meant "going back to the main page to pick another article", but I guess I can see how your mental filter might make it look like something different.

    42. Re:Take back Slashdot by dbIII · · Score: 1

      More badges, go back to numerical representations of karma

      It became too much of a game and was annoying. Now the annoying game seems to be people who just come to argue like high school debating losers nearly every time an opinion is expressed. They do not seem to understand that I do not care that they know some petty little tricks to argue against reality or recently performed well at spelling bees but they go on and on.

    43. Re:Take back Slashdot by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      The worst spam content I have seen in the comments have lately been that APK guy that seems to have some kind of automated poster or that dude is very persistent.

      Slashvertisments seems to be worse - and sometimes dupe-stories are posted linking the original story via outfits like softpedia instead of directly to the source.

      I can also agree that linking to sites like Forbes that are die-hard anti-adblock is a sour thing to take. To me Forbes is worse than 4chan these days. On 4chan you have mild ads, and you are politely asked to disable the adblocker there and when you do you actually don't get the screen taken over by 24 little green lizards. On Forbes you have a kiloton of ads that you have to wade through to get to the content - with a great risk of getting infected too.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    44. Re:Take back Slashdot by shanen · · Score: 1

      In general, I agree with you because there is too much abuse of anonymity, but one of the features I want and would prefer to donate towards would be a maturity filter. If an account is too young, then I don't want to see it at all. My setting would probably be at least two or three months, but I'd like to see the statistics on the average lifespans of sock puppets.

      The broader question of moderation is messy... What sort of project would I be willing to put money on? Tough question...

      Theoretically? I think there should be a number of orthogonal dimensions, and each dimension should be logarithmic rather than linear. Some characteristics of posts and posters should be based on a combination of traits. For example, I think there should be a "sincerity" dimension, and one of the traits of a true troll would be an average sincerity on the negative side... However to keep it simpler for the newbies, I think the default dimensionality should be low, perhaps 3 or 5 dimensions (with funny as one of the defaults), though people can turn on additional dimensions if they are interested in them...

      In addition, I think that posters should earn multidimensional karma from their posts (but still on a logarithmic basis). To top it off, people who have acquired a positive average in some dimension should get double mod points in that dimension. And remember the mod points could go positive or negative...

      So much for theory. Now in practice, let the flame wars commence!

      --
      Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
    45. Re:Take back Slashdot by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No more "APK" posts, ban that spam-laden prick and put in a filter to stop him from polluting this site like he's done for the last several years.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    46. Re:Take back Slashdot by hambone142 · · Score: 1

      Add to that, cut the SJW crap as well as the "downtrodden race/gender du jour" articles need to go in the shit can.

      Thank you.

    47. Re: Take back Slashdot by hambone142 · · Score: 2

      Harumph!

      I wholeheartedly agree.

      (Celebrate diversity, not your diversity, MINE!!)

    48. Re:Take back Slashdot by DerekLyons · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I say that also with the idea in mind that so many people prefer to live in their own echo chamber such that they are not often look for an educated discussion, rather just a way to be a part of their flavor of groupthink. (And /. has been guilty of that as well of course.)

      I was about to say... Part of the reason I'm not on /. so much anymore is that it has become an echo chamber and intolerant of those who don't follow the herd and think according to the groupthink.

      It's neither beta.slashdot nor Dice that killed Slashdot, it's that it failed to remain relevant and increasingly become hostile. As more and more places offered forums or mailing lists or even blog comments... people left Slashdot because "news for nerds" had become "cultism for nerds".

    49. Re:Take back Slashdot by lsllll · · Score: 1

      I really don't understand this "News for Nerds" narrowing of what we're supposed to see on Slashdot. As a nerd, I've always taken an interest in my own rights and those of my fellow human beings. The stories I see on SD revolves mostly around science and technology with a touch of our rights being lost. It hits me right on the spot. Sure, there are some stories I am not interested in, but I just skip over those. What's the big deal?

      --
      Is that a roll of dimes in your pocket or are you happy to see me?
    50. Re:Take back Slashdot by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      Possibly. Sorry for the confusion. Back buttons can also be used to go back to previous domains.

    51. Re:Take back Slashdot by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      Let me continue to beat this dead horse: all that Slashdot really has going for it is a (minority) smart readership

      If by that you mean a minority of Slashdot readers are smart, sure. Otherwise not so much. Most Slashdot readers aren't nearly as smart as they or other Slashdot readers think they are - and that's one of the keys to understanding the decline.

    52. Re:Take back Slashdot by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Since you seem to actually be reading these responses....

      markdown. HTML was the latest and greatest we had when Slashdot came out. Let people write in markdown, restructured text, bbcode, html, latex.... Nikola and iPython can do it.

      Unicode support. It's 2016. For the love of god, Unicode support.

      How about a completely redone-HTML5 skeleton and have a design competition for who can theme it the best. CSS has come pretty far since 2001.

    53. Re:Take back Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I exclusively post AC. I get modded everything from -1 Troll to +5 Insightful to +5 Interesting.

      AC posting encourages discourse and thoughtful expression unrestrained by social taboos. Elimination of AC's deprives the community of uncomfortable truths, criticism of dogma, and edgy satire.

      Socrates was forced to drink poison hemlock in retribution for "sophistry" and making people look foolish. I hold many unpopular opinions that would result in ostracism if vocalized publicly. Some of these opinions are unpopular because they are wrong, and some of them are unpopular because they aren't. Posting anonymously allows me to argue them on their merits and have my beliefs shaped by the persuasiveness of the responses I receive.

      Without this "sounding board" of anonymous speech the opinions which were both wrong and unpopular would have nowhere to go except to fester inside corrupting the integrity of my judgement. In many cases, I will deliberately take an extreme position that I don't believe just to play the devil's advocate and provoke a discussion I believe is worth having.

      Slashdot is where I come to measure the quality of my thoughts, and to learn to more effective persuasion. The readership is more intelligent than the average Reddit user, and as a consequence: the moderation system offers me a somewhat unique way to numerically gauge an argument on it's unbiased merits.

      For all these reasons: Slashdot comments section is a valuable institution providing freedom of speech on the internet and the marketplace of ideas as a whole.

    54. Re:Take back Slashdot by Kobun · · Score: 1

      What about the deceptive-as-hell big green "Download" buttons that have nothing to do with the software for whicha download is being attempted?

      Even without the bundled shitware, my users routinely got burned by the ... alternative ... download buttons on every page. Blackholed along with Cnet and the like.

    55. Re:Take back Slashdot by dgatwood · · Score: 4, Informative

      BBCode should also probably be on that list as an input option, ideally with a nice button-based interface for people who don't want to have to mess with typing markup while they write comments. And that interface should be mobile-friendly. If you've ever tried to post from an iPhone even once, you've probably developed a solid hatred for any sort of markup-based posting. The keyboard just doesn't work well for that. But there are ways to make at least semi-usable UIs for mobile devices.

      Speaking of Safari/WebKit, somebody needs to actually try to use this website on Safari on OS X, and fix everything that doesn't work... like the Options button (and, for that matter, most of the overlay views, if memory serves).

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    56. Re:Take back Slashdot by Z00L00K · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I can agree on the Unicode support, but also see a problem with it since it opens up for spammers in Korean, Japanese and a kiloton of other languages as well as using unicode versions of lookalike characters that would make a word readable but hard to catch in spam filters.

      But it may be good to at least review which Unicode characters that may be let through so that we may get a few fresh ones.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    57. Re:Take back Slashdot by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      Add moderator-driven IP-based bans that last for a week. Add a hidden Markov model that recognizes posts that are substantively similar to posts that triggered a ban, and auto-reject those posts and flag the IP for ban consideration by a moderator. Auto-reject posts that contain the n-word. Those three changes alone would significantly improve the noise level.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    58. Re:Take back Slashdot by Z00L00K · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It's like removing the salt and spices from the food you eat.

      You need some level of obnoxious people to keep things alive. If everything is just banana smoothies and teletubbies all day long you would get bored pretty quickly.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    59. Re:Take back Slashdot by Z00L00K · · Score: 3, Funny

      No, you mix it up with NSA - the only agency that really listens to you.

      Slashdot isn't the government though.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    60. Re:Take back Slashdot by Greyfox · · Score: 1

      That guy's still around? I thought he was mauled to death by a pack of angry badgers after his 14th Columbine story. I'd actually still be posting as an AC if it wasn't for him (and the ability to block specific submitters that having a real user ID had.)

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    61. Re:Take back Slashdot by mjwx · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The deal closed less than 24 hours ago. We're going to look at all options in order to improve the experience. And, no, that doesn't mean we're going to roll out a crappy new interface without listening to user feedback. We want to make sure we get it right.

      Hi Whiplash,

      First off, thank you for starting out by engaging the community but as you undoubtedly know we're a cynical, suspicious, curmudgeony lot...

      Well let me put it this way, many of us would like some kind of idea as to what Bizx's long term plans for /. and SourceForge are. Presumably a sum of money exchanged hands for these sites and brands and it is not unreasonable for Bizx to expect to make that money back by some means.

      The promises of listening to the community and doing right are all good and well... but as I said we're a cynical and curmudgeony lot so we're quick to go into "we've heard all this before" mode. Also that Bizx is a marketing company, knowing their motivations and desired outcomes would help allay many of our suspicions.

      BTW, FWIW I hope for the best (experience sadly, has taught me to expect the worst). Also feature request: may we have an option to have an automatic translation of US customary measurements into Metric.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    62. Re:Take back Slashdot by mcrbids · · Score: 2

      Wish I had mod points! So, I'll agree, blah blah.

      It seems absurd to have lameness filters that seem to specifically target code on a site that caters to the coder types! And the 4 minute limit is just silly. Back when it was still publicly shown, I had karma out the yin yang. I'm sure I still do, even though it's no longer displayed in any form that I can tell.

      Slashdot trumps Reddit for quality of articles, Reddit bests Slashdot for UI and comment participation, though posting on Reddit has become such a land mine I don't bother unless I'm on a very small/exclusive subreddit)

      --
      I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    63. Re:Take back Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I love the social justice stories. Because when whiny bitches like you post about how unfair sjw's are (and you actually use sjw in a non-ironic way), I just add you to my foes list. I've been able to read Slashdot so much more quickly since you pussies started outing yourselves by whining about how oppressed you are.

    64. Re:Take back Slashdot by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 2

      Well, we also want the f-word banned. And the c-word, the b-word, several s-words, and for some reason a z-word (but only if you pronounce that as zed-word).

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    65. Re:Take back Slashdot by Gumby · · Score: 1

      Thank you for taking on the task of keeping /. viable.

      my suggestions:
      * Keep the RSS feed of stories, it is the primary way I get sucked in.
      * Give a small amount of mod points to lurkers. Modding has a much lower activation energy, but makes people feel like they are participating, which would then probably get them to post more as well. I would log in much more often to chime in via moderation if I had mod points to give.

    66. Re:Take back Slashdot by istartedi · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Gamify the f--k out of Karma.

      We've both been around long enough to remember numerical Karma, I think. I know I remember building up a fairly high number, and then "spending" it with some silly trolls just for grins and giggles. Have you thought through the whole idea of gamifying it?

      Anyway, I don't actively block ads on Slashdot--they're just collateral damage of script blocking. The script blocking is just there to avoid security and/or poor page performance issues. If the new owners can actually find a way to make me view ads without killing the site, they wouldn't just be fixing Slashdot--they'd be demonstrating a model that could fix the web in general.

      Yes, that's a tall order and I'm skeptical. I don't know if it's the ad networks or the advertisers, or what; but the state of the art in ads is for them to be annoying as hell to end-users. You'd have to go back to regular old non-animated GIFs served from the same domain in order for me to view ads, and I think that's a tough sell to advertisers, or ad-networks, or anybody that's built a web site in the past 15 years.

      This is not quite the same as gamifying Karma, but I think if they borrowed the "gold" concept from reddit and kept their hands off the moderation and Karma systems they might have something. You know how that works? Users buy "gold" for other users. Getting gold unlocks some site features, the money goes to reddit. There is a thing that tells you how much server time the gold purchase has provided.

      I'm not sure how much of reddit is funded by gold, but it's probably a big chunk. I've gotten it once--it's way harder to get than a +5 comment, at least for me; but then I don't intentionally try to play to that crowd just for Internet points...

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    67. Re: Take back Slashdot by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 1, Troll

      She never fetched me slippers, but she did volunteer work, helping anorexics with recovery, building urban farms with me to help feed the homeless, that sort of thing. I was very proud to support her, and she appreciated being able to do what her compassion told her to do instead of a boss.

      And she was proud to take care of me, because she knew my work makes the world better for everyone on earth, but I'm too stoic and tend to forget to eat for 16 hours when my head is pluued in.

      The really fucked up thing is, you can't concieve that giving a woman such a life is a gift, not a curse. Like working 40 hours a week for some rich bastard is the be all and end all. You know it's rich men who are grooming you to think that way, right?

      When every man in town is working for you, enticing women to neglect their role and serve you is the only way to get more power.

      And people are so stupid they buy it hook line and sinker. Reminds me of the head fuckery I experienced in the infantry, frankly.

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    68. Re:Take back Slashdot by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      And with that sig, nobody can say the same of you.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    69. Re:Take back Slashdot by Hussman32 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree more should be given, but at least let you keep the points when you do get them (right now you lose them in three days, which always feels like two days). If I'm in a rush I wouldn't use the mod points as well as if I had time to think about them.

      --
      "Who are you?" "No one of consequence." "I must know." "Get used to disappointment."
    70. Re:Take back Slashdot by BronsCon · · Score: 2

      lameness filter would catch the excessive unicode

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    71. Re:Take back Slashdot by tlhIngan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Websites that change owners frequently pretty much scream "potentially valuable asset that nobody has figured out how to make money on!" Because if they did actually make money, they wouldn't be getting sold. So Slashdot is a pretty obvious money sink, but it does have a desirable reading audience, many of whom are absurdly vocal about how they don't want to read ads, subscribe or otherwise do anything that would, you know, make the site profitable.

      I think that's the vocal minority.

      First, - ads. There's a lot of ads (regular ads, not the sponsored articles) and most of them are quite irrelevant, motion and browser-slow crap. Find some tasteful self-hosted manually-screened ads appropriate to the audience, and only have one, or two tops on a page.

      Second - subscriptions. Offer subscriptions and promote the benefits. One of the biggest ones is subscribers get HTTPS access (!). Given the current environment, sell that - let people subscribe for HTTPS. Naturally get rid of the ads (you're buying privacy!) but hey, now you have a value-add that many people would find valuable. People don't care for early access to stories - they want real features. HTTPS is one of those.

      If you're an SEO company, you should know exactly your audience to optimize for them. If they did their research, they should know what the audience wants.

    72. Re:Take back Slashdot by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      I love you. Seriously, that post has forever earned you and any team members involved in the crapware-removal project a place, forever, in my heart. Now, hold to your word on that, as my heart is capable of many strong feelings, not just love; please don't break it. :)

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    73. Re:Take back Slashdot by Mal-2 · · Score: 4, Informative

      And no more paywalled source articles we can't read, please. Sorry StartsWithABang, it's not personal, but you write for a publication that doesn't want us ad-blocking types as readers.

      --
      How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
    74. Re:Take back Slashdot by Trepidity · · Score: 2

      Rather than responding directly to this suggestion, I'd like to go to the archives and quote an Anonymous Coward from 2001:

      I hate jon katz
      he is so fats
      he sucks on dicks
      and shits on cats

    75. Re:Take back Slashdot by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      Oh, please. If you really fear mass moderation then just register a throw-away account. You're not gaining anonyminity by posting as AC, you're just making it possible for someone to speak on your behalf.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    76. Re:Take back Slashdot by bennetthaselton · · Score: 1

      But how will people figure out how to get the ice lines moving at Burning Man?

    77. Re:Take back Slashdot by TopSpin · · Score: 1

      Indeed. The political stuff has been very, very harmful.

      Undo this mistake. Learn to identify SJW stuff, grievance mongering and other controversy click bait. Then ban it. After a few months of no global warming stories to squabble over the malcontents will get bored and wander off. Maybe then the place can recover.

      Or don't. I've found my alternatives. And after a few more years of decline and the next sale some other owner will get a chance to fix it.

      --
      Lurking at the bottom of the gravity well, getting old
    78. Re:Take back Slashdot by shione · · Score: 1

      Could you please raise the issue that journals are broken on here. For one, theres no way to get to a persons journal by clicking links. we have to resort to typing in our journal address in the browser url bar. Secondly, journals entries get archived within a short amount of them and then nobody can comment on them. Shouldnt the journal owner have a say in how long they want to accept comments for?

    79. Re:Take back Slashdot by Nexion · · Score: 1

      What we will likely get is some SJW BS. Pro tip, when they change dealers on you at the table; get up and grab a drink. Find a new table. May I suggest Hackaday?

    80. Re:Take back Slashdot by Nexion · · Score: 1

      Sold out, what don't you understand?

    81. Re:Take back Slashdot by Nexion · · Score: 1

      Actually my posts were at +2 before... now they start at +1 strangely.

    82. Re:Take back Slashdot by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Well, make sure you don't listen too much to loud, angry posters in this thread. It seems like every thread we get someone whining about how much slashdot has gone down the tubes for doing something that's been going on for the last 15 years, like having articles on politics for example, or typos in the summary...

      Personally, I think the thing that's been missing a bit recently is stories about stuff individuals have hacked and built. I have a recollection of there being more of those (don't trust my rose tinted glasses!) and I like 'em. Plus, news for nerds.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    83. Re:Take back Slashdot by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      What about the relentless left-wing social justice stories that blame nerds for everything wrong in the world?

      We need those stores so we have a good idea about who the raving nutjobs are. You know the sort of people who confuse something like "something doesn't seem quite right here, maybe there's something we can do" with "omg your blaming nerds for everything its actually about ethics in videogame journalism great white sharks oppose the eating of boats (I already reported that other shark) you probably bit yourself in half omg help i'm so oppressed"

      It might help if you stopped acting so tribal with your chosen association of "nerds".

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    84. Re:Take back Slashdot by rastos1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If slashdot would not mangle characters such as pound, euro, quotes, copyright sign and few others, then it would be more than enough for me.

    85. Re:Take back Slashdot by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      I don't mind Bennett's posts. They are a good opportunity to vent some anger and frustration, and occasionally write something witty.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    86. Re:Take back Slashdot by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Anyway, I don't actively block ads on Slashdot--they're just collateral damage of script blocking.

      Yeah, same. I actually get the "disable ads" checkbox for being a long time contributor or something and I've never checked it. I'm happy to view non-obnoxious ads. I'm not happy to run scripts willy-nilly. If you fix the ads to not use obnoxious scripts, then I'll start seeing them again and I'll make no effort to stop if they don't get in the way.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    87. Re:Take back Slashdot by perryizgr8 · · Score: 1

      Please change the UI to something simpler.

      --
      Wealth is the gift that keeps on giving.
    88. Re:Take back Slashdot by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Also feature request: may we have an option to have an automatic translation of US customary measurements into Metric.

      Even Google can't get that right. Try typing in "1 gallon in litres" and see what it gives you. I get 4.54609, and someone in the US gets 3.78541, and anywhere else in the world I have no idea.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    89. Re:Take back Slashdot by MadCat · · Score: 1

      Katz wasn't all that bad was he? I can't exactly recall what he wrote... been a while. Also hail, fellow member of the 3 digit UID club.

      --
      There is no sig...
    90. Re:Take back Slashdot by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Some of us like the "left-wing social justice" stories, that's why we keep voting for them in the firehose. If you don't like them just don't read or comment on them. Some of us want to discuss these things, and no-one is forcing you to join in.

      People say SJWs are opposed to freedom of speech, usually while trying to take prevent them even talking about anything the speaker disagrees with.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    91. Re: Take back Slashdot by dave420 · · Score: 1

      So you are illogical to the point of reducing half the population to mere objects, then get all pissy and complain when people point that out to you? Thank fuck you and those who "think" like you will be dead one day and society can move on.

    92. Re:Take back Slashdot by dave420 · · Score: 2

      Seeing as there is more than one "gallon", you have to be more specific. As soon as you define which gallon you are referring to, Google gets it perfectly correct.

    93. Re:Take back Slashdot by LordWabbit2 · · Score: 1

      Can't mod you any higher, so I will just like to say I agree. Mod or Post, not both. /.'s moderation system is the best I have encountered out there, not to say it does not have some downsides (certain types of posts get -1 modded into oblivion regardless of their actual value) but it's the best I have come across.

      --
      There are three kinds of falsehood: the first is a 'fib,' the second is a downright lie, and the third is statistics.
    94. Re:Take back Slashdot by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      "news for nerds"

      I think this site needs more porn . . . "Nudes for Nerds!" . . .

      All joking aside, this site has incredible value. I don't come here to read the news; I can do that elsewhere. I come here to read what other nerds think about the news. You could post a story about Kim Kardashian's butt . . . one Slashdotter will post that he is working on his Ph.D. on celebrity posterior geometry. Another seismic expert will compare Kim's crack to the San Andreas fault.

      The real value here, is from all these folks, who take their time to post their wisdom. When I buy anything . . . the first thing that I do, is to google through Slashdot. Slashdotters have bought everything, tried everything, and are not afraid to say, "This is cool!" or "This sucks!"

      I wish you the best of luck with your new endeavor, and hope that the Slashdot community will continue to produce valuable information on the Internet!

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    95. Re:Take back Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Hi Whiplash. I've been a very long term Slashdot reader who used to moderate etc. My effective protest about Dice was that I stopped logging in to my account; I'm going to celebrate this change by getting a new one or possibly reactivating my old one. Hopefully I will be able to continue that indefinitely. In the meantime a comment similar to one I made to Dice long ago.

      Your comment about not replacing the user interface sounds like you are thinking about it. This is an obvious thing. Probably by now the code is big and difficult to maintain. Certainly the interface is old and limits certain new ideas. Dice didn't start the rewrite project for no reason. Before you even consider doing this read things you should never do.

      The money quote is

      You are throwing away your market leadership. You are giving a gift of two or three years to your competitors, and believe me, that is a long time in software years.

      Remember, this is will be on top of the three years Dice already threw away. Obviously, if you have some new ideas, then you are going to want to update the user interface. The main thing is that, if you do that, you need to do it in an evolutionary way, step by step, at all times fully with the old code base and at all times delivering new functions to all of the existing users. Otherwise you will end up like dice. Building a new interface that nobody uses and still maintaining the old one. If you really believed you could start Slashdot from scratch then you wouldn't have bought slashdot, just created a new one.

      This means "throw away" the work Dice did on software that nobody wants. Start by announcing that the mobile interface is dead. Get everybody back onto one code base. Then start to see if you can mix new functionality together into the old interface. You may even be able to salvage some of the new work. The key thing is a) never introduce more than one new major feature at a time b) don't start introducing the next feature until the previous one is in use by, or at least visible to the majority of the code users c) back out changes if they make the users unhappy.

      N.B. If you want to make any money from advertising to me you have to serve acceptable ads. Recent experience says that there's no way that I'm turning off the AdBlocker and the harder people try to make me the more I'm going to fight them, however I do, possibly stupidly, still keep the acceptable ads setting turned on in AdBlock Plus.

    96. Re:Take back Slashdot by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Actually, Adria Richards is doing just fine. She regularly speaks at different events and has a consulting business. If you read her blog (http://butyoureagirl.com/) her position is actually quite moderate. It's just that one event that got blown out of all proportion.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    97. Re:Take back Slashdot by Teun · · Score: 1

      +1 interesting.
      Though I'd be careful with the seniority and at least mix it with both historic and recent karma scores.

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    98. Re:Take back Slashdot by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Well what consists news for nerds. Or do you mean news for 1980s nostalgia where we cling to our Commodore 64 and Apple ][ and IBM XT for the PC and large Vax, IBM, and Prime mainframes for business. Where just keeping the systems running was a full time job.

      Times change and what is considered nerdy stuff changed too.

      You should be glad that slashdot didn't fall like digg

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    99. Re:Take back Slashdot by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      I think it would help to have some kind of filter. Some people really, really don't seem to like stories about women or education, for example, so a way to filter those would be welcome. Aside from getting angry they tend to derail any discussion on those topics.

      More interviews would be good too. The recent ones with Stallman and Wu were interesting. Keep them coming.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    100. Re:Take back Slashdot by crvtec · · Score: 1

      Get off my lawn, young whipper slasher!

    101. Re:Take back Slashdot by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      I'd subscribe for HTTP and some slightly better access (early view of articles, lower time limit between posts etc.)

      In fact I'd do it right now if it wasn't broken.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    102. Re:Take back Slashdot by jellomizer · · Score: 2
      • - Unicode support: We can put in a few more codes. But lets not get crazy here. We wouldn't want to really mess things up too much. The problem with some more modern sites is they get messy allowing people to be too creative in what characters they use. Slashdot is more of read the text. Not make it fanciful. A few extra characters say for mathematics could be useful though.
      • - Fix the broken "lameness filter": This is Slashdot not Stack Exchange. posting long code will not help explain your point. While I don't think I have ever ran across problems with a billeted list.
      • - No more StartsWithAShill and other trolls: Trolling has always been a problem on Slashdot and it is hard to fix. Part of the problem is this is suppose to be an area to express your free ideas and a community govern moderating system. This means sometimes controversial ideas or unpopular ones will be labeled as trolls, just because the moderator disagrees with it. But it isn't deleted.
      • - Allow older accounts...: Ohh you used a free web site longer then someone else. Go pat yourself on the back, and bask in your mountains of participation trophies.
      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    103. Re:Take back Slashdot by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      How about a completely redone-HTML5 skeleton and have a design competition for who can theme it the best. CSS has come pretty far since 2001.
      Where you around when they tried to show off beta? OMG Things are different... DIFFERENT!!!!!! Every change on Slashdot appearance is met with harsh retribution.
       

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    104. Re:Take back Slashdot by Etherwalk · · Score: 1

      And take a look at some of the social networking developments we've had in the last fifteen years.

      Moderation is useful and serves a function, but so does something like a "Like" button or an upvoting system that tallies more than three points off the norm for logged-in users. We are nerds! Free the data!

    105. Re:Take back Slashdot by LaurenCates · · Score: 1

      I, too, appreciate those stories.

      So often I lament about the lack of true roundness of education that given there's a whole world out there beyond our interests, "relevant" should not only mean "stuff we like to read and talk about", but also things that are necessary to talk about. Or, if you like, things that will affect us whether they're considered "nerdy" or not.

      --
      Some people don't believe in fairies. I don't believe in The Patriarchy.
    106. Re:Take back Slashdot by jcr · · Score: 2

      So, does that mean an end to the SJW bullshit we've been seeing lately?

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    107. Re:Take back Slashdot by jcr · · Score: 1

      My own leading suggestion: no more AC posting,

      Fuck you.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    108. Re:Take back Slashdot by NaCh0 · · Score: 1

      As someone who has been around since the near begging (prior to username registrations), fuck off with your unicode bullshit. A-Za-z0-9 is good enough for everyone. Adding in a bunch of faggoty emoji codes will only accelerate the decline around here.

    109. Re:Take back Slashdot by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      I like them.

      You should totally get rid of FartsInABong though.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    110. Re:Take back Slashdot by Barny · · Score: 1

      Oh, OH! And while we are at it, can we have some smilies? Specifically, MLP ones?

      Come on, this works in politics all the time, can't I tack a rider onto this good list of features?

      --
      ...
      /me sighs
    111. Re:Take back Slashdot by Monoman · · Score: 1

      15 years .... time flies and I still check /. at least once per day. I wonder what the stats are for active accounts by age.

      --
      Keep the Classic Slashdot.
    112. Re:Take back Slashdot by jandersen · · Score: 1

      I think I can answer some of those (obviously, I'm not part of the /. team):

      Is Slashdot going to stop those ridiculous paid links to forbes.com?

      No. 'Anything for money' seems to be at the core of the ethos in online media. I would encourage /. to do us hardcore engineers a favour and flag up any article with links to the glossy magazines, so we can ignore them. There are, believe it or not, people who actually want to read that stuff.

      What about the relentless left-wing social justice stories that blame nerds for everything wrong in the world?

      You have completely lost me there - to anybody other than an American, there seems to bo nothing in American news that can be called 'left-wing'. As for reports on activism - I don't recall seeing many reports on that; certainly not enough to call it relentless. But unlike the glossies, these are actual news: actual stories about things some people actually do. News are not necessarily something we like to hear about - I certainly don't like to hear about Daesh, but it is necessary to keep in the loop to some extent. And I don't see nerds being blamed for everything in the world; I see discussions about spammers, hackers, scams and other abuses of technology. Are nerds involved in this? Some are, no doubt, but nobody claims that every nerd is a criminal.

      What about constant news-today-gone-tomorrow political stories that are general news, at best?

      I like those - as a nerd, I am in fact intensely interested in politics, philosophy, religion, science etc - anything that requires deep thinking. If you don't like it, don't waste your time on it. Politics has its own category, so it should be easy. Technology doesn't exist in isolation - if there is an anti-science trend in politics, then it is likely to have a bearing on what we are doing, if the States doesn't invest in education while China invests massivly, we will end up lagging behind, and that will have a bearing on what we are doing, ... I think it is important, and the political stories are one of the main reasons why I haven't left /. a long time ago. That in itself may be a good or a bad thing, depending on your view, of course.

    113. Re:Take back Slashdot by Rei · · Score: 1

      Were you sent here by the devil?

      --
      What the hells goin on in the engine room? Were there monkeys? Some terrifying space monkeys maybe got loose?
    114. Re:Take back Slashdot by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Metamoderation is broken though. It should go back to the old system where you moderate the moderation - as the name implies.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    115. Re:Take back Slashdot by goarilla · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I agree, we need the liberty to post AC so "con-conformist"/contraversial ideas or uncomfortable issues can get attention.
      I sometimes post AC myself on a topic I want to know more about to incite knowledgeable people to inform me for example.
      Maybe we should only allow anonymous posts from real accounts, so the drive-by AC's and lazy trolls can't abuse it.
      Like an anonymous "idea box" in an office. It's sort of anonymous but only from the people who are employees.

    116. Re:Take back Slashdot by houghi · · Score: 1

      I also would like to be able to post more comments. When I get hit with a 'you posted something 4 min utes ago' is terrible. I understand that it is against bots, bvut apperently it hurts people.

      Us the karma scale to shorten that time. Karma of excelent, 20 seconds. Add a minute to eacvh level and 5 minutes for everybody else, for all I care.

      Yes, sometimes I and I assume others will want to post faster.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    117. Re:Take back Slashdot by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Those that are interested in this (both of them) will find out by going to Burning Man.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    118. Re:Take back Slashdot by tehcyder · · Score: 3

      Please fuck off. Slashdot is not Slashdot without the AC.

      Says the AC...

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    119. Re:Take back Slashdot by Opportunist · · Score: 5, Funny

      I truly loved his articles.

      Ok, that's overstating it. I loved it when he wrote an article. The content was negligible but you could count on really awesome comments.

      One could say his articles were like the dud auditions on American Idle. You don't watch it for the crappy performance but for the vitriolic comments.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    120. Re:Take back Slashdot by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      No. For many reasons:

      Anonymous Cowards
      Trolls will be trolls. And given the nature of this site, people who want to troll will already have created scripts to supply them with an endless stream of new accounts. You will see exactly nothing in the posting history of some dedicated troll because there will be none. The only thing you accomplish that way is a bloated user database with tons of throwaway accounts cluttering it. Plus you will not get to see certain comments from people who happen to have some kind of insider knowledge that they cannot share using even a handle that might get traced back to them due to repercussions. People will not register an account for this, they will simply not give you that, possibly very informative and insightful, bit of information.

      Posting and modding, along with editing
      While I would like to be able to mod again (seriously, who is reading stuff he doesn't want to comment on here?), I could see too much room for abuse. Same goes for editing. I read a post and write a comment to it, in the meantime it is being edited and its meaning turned inside out to troll.

      Nope. There are a few things left that really work on /. Don't change those.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    121. Re:Take back Slashdot by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      What about the relentless left-wing social justice stories that blame nerds for everything wrong in the world?

      What about the over-entitled whining mummy's boys who think any criticism of the system that they've done well by is a personal attack?

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    122. Re: Take back Slashdot by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Supply and demand, you can only demand what the other side is willing to pay.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    123. Re:Take back Slashdot by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I always found it hilarious how he never took on board any of the comments. People would give him useful hints like "it's too long", "this is rambling drivel" or "you have no idea what you are talking about, you fucking idiot" and he'd just ignore them and post the same shit the next week. I assumed it was some kind of parody, or maybe he was going for a kind of "most hated man on the internet" clickbait.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    124. Re:Take back Slashdot by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      And no more paywalled source articles we can't read, please. Sorry StartsWithABang, it's not personal,

      ...but your articles are shit and you are shit. Wait, maybe it is personal. Because his articles are shit. They are never the best article on any subject.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    125. Re:Take back Slashdot by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Yeah, same. I actually get the "disable ads" checkbox for being a long time contributor or something and I've never checked it.

      It doesn't work. It not only doesn't disable all ads, but it disables none of the trackers. At best you're still generating a bunch of needless page loads every time you open Slashdot. It also doesn't remove the sidebar, and if you actually disable ads, then it breaks the script I use to remove the sidebar, so it's just an annoyance.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    126. Re:Take back Slashdot by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I don't care what you do to the interface from here on out as long as you leave the classic interface alone and keep it as an option from here on out. Does anyone who cares even use the AJAXy interface?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    127. Re:Take back Slashdot by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Slashdot USED to have a lot of top names and Celebs here regularly having a dialog on topics.

      it's been YEARS since I have seen any of those people post, and looking at their username info, they haven't for good reason. Content has been dumbed way down to the point that what I see on slashdot is what I saw on other sites hours or days beforehand.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    128. Re:Take back Slashdot by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Personally, I think the thing that's been missing a bit recently is stories about stuff individuals have hacked and built.

      You can always just follow hack a day, where most of that stuff on here comes from. Then you can get howtos on littering with throwies even more often!

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    129. Re:Take back Slashdot by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      You guys should hire Jon Katz.

      Last I heard, he'd changed sides and become Jon Dogz.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    130. Re:Take back Slashdot by justthinkit · · Score: 1

      Who needs the book? Good NYT article on the subject by JR right here

      --
      I come here for the love
    131. Re:Take back Slashdot by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Add to that, cut the SJW crap as well as the "downtrodden race/gender du jour" articles need to go in the shit can.

      Thank you.

      Let me guess, those are the downtrodden races or genders of which you're not a member?

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    132. Re:Take back Slashdot by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      Probably because you had his stories in the filter, as pretty much everyone else.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    133. Re:Take back Slashdot by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      Come on, OMG ponies was good.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    134. Re:Take back Slashdot by justthinkit · · Score: 1

      Re: making $ from Slashdot. When I was considering a paid membership, I learned that there are almost no benefits. Only two I remember? (1) Ability to read all comments by a poster (rather than some limit) and (2) Get stories shown earlier.

      These were offset by (3) You get dinged/charged every time you read the main page. What a galatically bad idea.

      A benefit I would pay for: (4) Ability to have ALL comments on one web page. When threads go above 200 to 300, this is only doable for the +4 or +5 comments. What I want is, at times, to be able to filter all -1 and 0 comments away and read everything else.

      The ability to comment on the next story earlier is a sound benefit and should stay an option.

      Maybe come up with a basketful of benefits -- either just more benefits, to get more to sign up, or you can choose which benefits you want to pay for (like the fee for *69, for example). Each benefit chosen costs $5/year or something.

      For $5 a year your web site link could be red-highlighted. I'm sure others can be thought of. But ditch the "1000 views of the home page" negative-benefit. I ride in cabs about once every 10 years because I simply can't stand being metered.

      --
      I come here for the love
    135. Re:Take back Slashdot by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      "ACs also don't want to be mass down moderated just because someone had to be the adult in the room and state the obvious or wanted to play devil's advocate in order to explore different ends of a position."

      This is a genuine problem, but he who builds enough karma can afford to burn some of it doing exactly that.

    136. Re:Take back Slashdot by SadButResolved · · Score: 2

      Most of schnell's post above are good ideas.

      Paid Subscribers getting +1 karma on all posts. There will not be many at first, perhaps gift some subscriptions to posters that have a clear head, and valuable insite.

      Gather up all ideas and come up with a polling system with the ones you like best. I'm sure we would all be very happy to discuss the changes in advance with the polling results.

      There is no reason this site couldn't be a hybrid reviewer of smart items on wiki, amazon (bb-8 toys), maker mag, or things like that. Mostly its all just comments, but the posts are in some cases, very insightful, even if they are not factual. This would help monetize the site without ticking everyone off, if you sprinkle some of these in with clear labeling.

      Promote less mainstream/fanboi and more cutting edge, once it goes mainstream may of us have lost interest in it already, and the fanboi's come out.

      Add a second karma like ranking: "Not factual", "no cited reference included", "reference not factual". This ranking should be next too and not replace the karma ranking.

      Remember to gather up the useful suggestions and let the community have some participation/voting/dialog on what you intend as changes. The Warcry "Remember the Beta!" or "F--- the Beta", is not the results you want.. Heed the advice, many of your site users can have 10x the experience of you or your coworkers, in just about every topic.

      GL.

    137. Re:Take back Slashdot by Minupla · · Score: 1

      It seems like every thread we get someone whining about how much slashdot has gone down the tubes

      But that's OK, because they've been doing that for the last 15 years. I view them as the /. historical preservation society.

      Min

      --
      On the whole, I find that I prefer Slashdot posts to twitter ones because I don't get limited to 140 chars before
    138. Re:Take back Slashdot by drakaan · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Both anonymous posting and the lack of an edit button are things that help conversations on /. be what they are. You're either an idiot n00b who will be rapidly excoriated for your idiotic drivel, or you'll contribute something useful to the conversation. It's like a more-inclusive version of the Linux Kernel Mailing List with multiple Linuses (Linus? Linii?).

      --
      "Murphy was an optimist" - O'Toole's commentary on Murphy's Law
    139. Re:Take back Slashdot by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      As do I. They provide invaluable protection for comments that might be politically unsafe tied to your own name in a public venue, but nonetheless vital to the conversation. Even the US Supreme Court has agreed that anonymity is an invaluable right, grounded in the free speech rights of the First Amendment to the US Constitution.

    140. Re:Take back Slashdot by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      > - Unicode support

      I'd not expect this for years. It tends to be destabilizing and makes changes in content processing far more expensive and lengthy to test. Flat text ASCII is perhaps uninteresting, but it makes code sanitizing far, safer.

    141. Re: Take back Slashdot by mooterSkooter · · Score: 1

      +1

    142. Re:Take back Slashdot by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      The amount of identification that needs to be given up to start an account is so small that anybody with a real insider position somewhere will not be deterred by having to set up a sing;e-purpose Gmail address in order to register here.

      And having registered, use-once accounts will be immediately obvious to all. We could even introduce another number to the comment header line: number of posts this account has made, and changing the existing AC filter to being able to filter on this count. No having to tunnel into posting history to identify throwaway accounts. Too much clutter in the comment header, you say? Then replace that numeric ID, which people use only for venerable-user bragging rights. My new post count would be a better view of the same information.

    143. Re:Take back Slashdot by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      Part of the reason I'm not on /. so much anymore is that it has become an echo chamber and intolerant of those who don't follow the herd and think according to the groupthink.

      For a while I felt like that too, but I realized that actually it's not nearly as homogeneous as people think. When it was really bad it was because the ant-feminist SJWs were mass downvoting anyone posting contrary opinions. Eventually people saw what has happening and started meta-moderating them to death, and now saying something contrary to the MRA narrative isn't a guaranteed -1 flamebait any more.

      It can take a while, but Slashdot usually self-corrects these things. It would be nice if the moderation system was a bit faster to self-correct, but don't give up on it.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    144. Re:Take back Slashdot by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      See what I mean, folks?

    145. Re:Take back Slashdot by jmac_the_man · · Score: 1

      Finally introduce a "-1, Factually Incorrect" mod.

      THIS. Most times when I downmod something, it's because the information contained in the post is wrong. It usually winds up as "Flamebait" but that doesn't really cover what's wrong with it.

    146. Re:Take back Slashdot by Grieviant · · Score: 1

      Some people really, really don't seem to like stories about women or education ... More interviews would be good too. The recent ones with Stallman and Wu were interesting. Keep them coming.

      I like you how casually put interviewing Stallman and Brianna Wu on the same footing. Really now Amimojo, maintaining the delusion that a failed mobile game developer who has taken up a new career as professional victim has done anything worthwhile in the tech community just to perpetuate her unearned e-celebrity status isn't going to lead to a good outcome for anyone. Aside from the extra cash in Wu's Patreon account, that is, which is I recall was brazenly linked to directly in the summary.

    147. Re:Take back Slashdot by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure how far we want to go with refining the scale of karma, but the treasured interface doesn't have to change. Just make your karma rating a link, which leads to a breakdown of the overall rating.

    148. Re:Take back Slashdot by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      Sourceforge switched overnight from my go-to for open source software to my "how badly do I really want this" last resort.

    149. Re:Take back Slashdot by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      No. I don't see what you mean, facist.

    150. Re:Take back Slashdot by arth1 · · Score: 1

      We're going to do our best to keep/bring back that "news for nerds" ethos and hopefully keep you here.

      Hopefully without just mirroring front page news from other sites like Forbes, Ars, Forbes, Techcrunch, Forbes, Reddit, Forbes, Gawker and Forbes. Once news has obtained a tail of several "via"s at the bottom, it's not news for nerds, stuff that matters.

      We need another tech news aggregator like we need a new version of Metro.

      There was a time when /. would write about the stuff that didn't just go for what you'd find at other sites, but stuff that wouldn't ever hit the Gizmodo front page.
      That was when /. was great.

    151. Re:Take back Slashdot by edittard · · Score: 1

      How de we know you're really the new owner?

      --
      At the bottom of the /. main page it says 'Yesterday's News'. Well they got that right.
    152. Re:Take back Slashdot by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 1

      I can agree on the Unicode support, but also see a problem with it since it opens up for spammers in Korean, Japanese and a kiloton of other languages as well as using unicode versions of lookalike characters that would make a word readable but hard to catch in spam filters.

      But it may be good to at least review which Unicode characters that may be let through so that we may get a few fresh ones.

      Yeah, like all the new emoticons.

    153. Re:Take back Slashdot by CharlieG · · Score: 1

      Ah, but it won't be the "Old" /. until we have CmdrTaco. Cowboy Neil, Hot Grits, First Posts, the Caveman, and "imagining a Beowulf cluster of these" BTW, that User ID is my second - Lost the ID and password to the first in a ISP change LONG ago

      Sigh, back in the era when /. was THE site, and I used to show up first thing every day

      --
      -- 73 de KG2V For the Children - RKBA! "You are what you do when it counts" - the Masso
    154. Re:Take back Slashdot by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      I have no objection to ugliness. It's what you say that counts.

    155. Re:Take back Slashdot by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There is a limit on the size that something can grow when it doesn't embrace mainstream culture, but entities that attempt to make that transition usually falter as they alienate their subculture userbase far faster than they attract mainstream participation. That may mean that Slashdot and other sites like it have an upper bound, but it's better than closing up shop.

      That's exactly right. It's the Unix philosophy: do one thing and do it right.

      I think it's useful to know that a lot of us around here have been here for literally decades at this point. It's hard to believe. I'm a mid-5-digit-uid guy and I've been here since 1998 or 1999. But the site has almost been around for 20 years now. We've grown up here. I was around 30 when I signed up, I'm almost 48 now.

      Slashdot is seeing the same trend as everywhere else where most younger kids are going somewhere else and this is a fairly consistent bunch of older guys. The point is that if you lose us there's unlikely to be anyone waiting in the wings to take our place.

      The Dice years - as they'll be known historically - sucked. We don't care about SJW stories. I mean, seriously, a bunch of 50 year old guys just don't give a fuck about that shit. Excuse my French.

      Let's have news for nerds. We've done it before. We saved Hotmail, we spammed Alan Ralsky in real life, we had fun.

      Let's get back there.

    156. Re:Take back Slashdot by mvdwege · · Score: 1

      I liked it. Bennet's rambling and the ranting in the comments took me back to fond memories of Jon Katz articles. Comedy gold.

      --
      "I know I will be modded down for this": where's the option '-1, Asking for it'?
    157. Re:Take back Slashdot by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 2

      Slashdot, a North American website, can't even display French and Spanish - the official languages of NAFTA.

      Metal heads can't type in the name of their fave band because of the umlaut, Mathematics nerds can't use greek letters in formulas and linguistic nerds would benefit from IPA.

      At the very least, white-list certain character ranges and combos.

    158. Re:Take back Slashdot by shawn2772 · · Score: 1

      Bah. This is news for nerds. If we're going to change the formatting options, let's go back to HTML being the only choice. If you can't figure out how to format your post with HTML tags, you don't belong here.

    159. Re:Take back Slashdot by supremebob · · Score: 1

      I wish I could be this optimistic. Odds are that the new owners will try to turn the site into Forbes clone with giant full screen video ads and interstitial ads in between stories.

      Then we get to play ad blocker Whack A Mole with this site as well.

    160. Re:Take back Slashdot by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 1

      Just to say, if someone actually has the job of "writing back end server code" may God help us. Has anything actually changed here in 15 years?

    161. Re:Take back Slashdot by houghi · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I would like to see a difference in anonymous because of not logging in and anonymous who has otherwise an excelent karma, but doe not want to reveal himself because of reasons (e.g. to give info they are not allowed to give).

      They should get a +1 by default and any +1 does not reflect on their karma, but any -1 would. That way you have the ability of posting anonymous, still not be at the bottom and no sillpostings just saying 'n*gg*rs' or 'frist post' as that would harm their karma.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    162. Re:Take back Slashdot by mvdwege · · Score: 1

      Fuck that shit. Do you see that tagline there? "News for Nerds"; if you can't handle about 8 HTML elements, and you really must have BBCode, then fuck off back to your scr!pt k!dd13 boards.

      (General you, d'oh)

      --
      "I know I will be modded down for this": where's the option '-1, Asking for it'?
    163. Re:Take back Slashdot by shawn2772 · · Score: 2

      Also feature request: may we have an option to have an automatic translation of US customary measurements into Metric.

      Even Google can't get that right. Try typing in "1 gallon in litres" and see what it gives you. I get 4.54609, and someone in the US gets 3.78541, and anywhere else in the world I have no idea.

      That is Google getting it impressively right, assuming you live in a region where the imperial gallon is used.

      Try typing "1 US gallon in liters" or "1 imperial gallon in liters" (or "litres" if you have that oddly-specific dyslexia common in British Commonwealth countries).

    164. Re:Take back Slashdot by mvdwege · · Score: 1

      You want a rightwing echo chamber, fuck off to Soylent.

      Frankly, I'm glad of the sizeable nutter contingent here. It makes me appreciate the few sane conservatives more.

      --
      "I know I will be modded down for this": where's the option '-1, Asking for it'?
    165. Re:Take back Slashdot by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

      /. seems fairly pro-Republican, pro-nuke, CC denialist. Not to mention every Firefox story degenerates into a Reductio ad Eich, in support of 'traditional marriage'.

    166. Re:Take back Slashdot by flopsquad · · Score: 1

      I have been forced to become somewhat of a ninja with
      , and forced autocorrect to recognize that there is no "be" tag**. However, it's still painful as hell on an iDevice. I'm in favor of bbcode or similar, with GUI buttons.

      I'm also in favor of Unicode support. Are we really concerned with lookalike chars and Korean spam evading the "filters" when we have moocow, APK, etc. spam every day?

      **Proposed feature for HTML6: <be>a tag for willing things into existence</be>... which, if it works the way I think it does, may have just willed the BE tag into existence. O_O

      --
      Nothing posted to /. has ever been legal advice, including this.
    167. Re:Take back Slashdot by strikethree · · Score: 1

      (I honestly don't remember when I 1st made this login but it was a long time ago now. Rob still had links to his favorite sites as part of the content.)

      Your userid is about the same as my first userid (lost passwd) so I would guess late 98 early 99.

      Kind regards,
      megaton

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
    168. Re:Take back Slashdot by bhhenry · · Score: 1

      Wow, an ID of over 4.3 million. How high do they go these days?

      --
      signature not found
    169. Re:Take back Slashdot by shawn2772 · · Score: 1

      Gamify the f--k out of Karma.

      We've both been around long enough to remember numerical Karma, I think. I know I remember building up a fairly high number, and then "spending" it with some silly trolls just for grins and giggles. Have you thought through the whole idea of gamifying it?

      +1

      Numerical Karma was replaced with the current system for very good reasons, learned through experience. (Note: Don't let my user ID fool you, I've also been around for quite some time. I just created a new G+ login-based account when for some reason username/password login stopped working on my desktop machine.)

    170. Re:Take back Slashdot by crashumbc · · Score: 1

      id checks out

    171. Re:Take back Slashdot by Forgefather · · Score: 2

      How about as a bonus to subscribers mod points expire in more time? Unless I am willing to dump 15 mod points into a single discussion then I am rarely able to spend them all. It makes the process feel a little pointless. How bout a subscriber's mod points take a week or so to expire instead of a few days? That would be a value add for me.

      I would NOT however give mod points based on subscriber status as that violates the principal that mod points should be distributed to the people who occupy the middle ground so as to encourage a more moderate discussion, and I am NOT advocating that the mod points should exceed the current 5-15 distribution. Armed with 15 mod points I can almost shape the entire discussion thread as is. If someone was able to accrue a large pile of points I shudder to think of the damage.

      Having extra time on mod points would enable people to pay for convenience and time. It is something that I would spend money on if it were an option.

      --
      "There are lies, there are damn lies, and there are statistics"
    172. Re:Take back Slashdot by takyon · · Score: 1

      It is not a rightwing echo chamber. We accept submissions from all comers, and most of the news is tech/science related.

    173. Re: Take back Slashdot by vel-ex-tech · · Score: 1

      Haha, obvious troll. Please either kill yourself or stay in Michigan, Indiana, Ohio, or where ever the fuck with all the other backwards people who would rather have led poisoning and fracking than a functional government and a healthy environment.

    174. Re:Take back Slashdot by Malc · · Score: 1

      It can't even display English properly: see what happens to the GBP symbol: £

    175. Re:Take back Slashdot by argStyopa · · Score: 1

      I'm sad that I can't post the picture of Ted Knight in a nautical suit here.

      I know it's not old-slashdotty to be posting pictures and such, but it would just fit so neatly.

      --
      -Styopa
    176. Re: Take back Slashdot by nukenerd · · Score: 1

      Grow the fuck up and join the rest of society here in 2016.

      Despite having grown up, I also have never liked working with women around, because they have always treated me with unspoken contempt. As for "the rest of society" I'm not special : in my observation 80% of women at work treat 80% of the men with contempt - the 20% of the men not so treated being the charmers and Jocks. Of course women are greatly outnumbered by men anyway if you work in tech, so women can be picky. Or they think they are being picky but actually manage to consort with some of the worse guys. Nothing new there, women's lib has made no difference.

      Don't tell me I should "break the ice" and try chatting to them at work; I've tried that and always nearly got a handbag in my face. I don't bother any more; I have found women though different routes, certainly not at work.

    177. Re:Take back Slashdot by DeputySpade · · Score: 1

      LOL! Early access to stories. That's awesome. *checks URL* Yep. I'm still on /. alright. Would that be early access to the story that I read 3 weeks ago somewhere else, early access to the dupe of the story I read on /. last month or early access to the StartsWithSpam clickbait/flamebait that I only click for the fun in the comments?

      You're right. I don't think early access is what would entice a subscriber.

      --


      This space intentionally left blank
    178. Re:Take back Slashdot by OzPeter · · Score: 1

      Could you get feedback from us "veterans" that have been reading /. for the past, year?

      Polls on the side bar .. where they belong!

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    179. Re:Take back Slashdot by NotDrWho · · Score: 1

      Just please remember that we come here for the technical knowledge of the user base. Don't be fooled by the joking around, /. still has one of the most well-educated and knowledgeable user-bases of any tech/science discussion site out there.

      We also come here for the freedom to openly discuss controversial topics without fear of censorship. While your fellow users may treat the "Troll" mod as a "I disagree with this" button, /. is still famous for the fact that admins don't (or at least aren't supposed to) censor. It was such a famous policy from the beginning that it actually made news when Taco was forced to take down a Scientology post.

      So if you come in here with a disregard for the user-base and the intention to start censoring or controlling the discussion, then you really just wasted your money. If the user-base leaves, you really just bought a bunch of empty servers.

      --
      SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    180. Re:Take back Slashdot by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Yeah. Karma can save you but then you have to be "good" and not step out of line in order to keep it up else you will end with bad karma and not be able to post.

    181. Re:Take back Slashdot by ComputerGeek01 · · Score: 1

      The readership is more intelligent than the average Reddit user,...

      I'm always glad to see that /. is held to such high standards.

    182. Re:Take back Slashdot by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      What's the difference between an AC and a throw away account other than the throw away account can be tracked back to someone easier so 8 years from now someone can bring up something that you have long ago changed your mind about and use that to get you fired from your job?

      Hell, there are a lot of insightful AC comments made in every story by people just browsing and wanting to add something who otherwise would never create an account.

    183. Re:Take back Slashdot by SecurityGuy · · Score: 1

      Disagree. Sometimes there are some very insightful and interesting AC comments. I'm willing to deal with the less valuable AC comments to keep those.

      Anonymity has always been a useful tool to express an opinion that the masses don't agree with, especially if there's are people with an axe to grind over that opinion.

    184. Re:Take back Slashdot by quantax · · Score: 1

      You guys should hire Jon Katz.

      Came for the news, stayed for the Jon Katz comments. Though he wasn't all that bad, just kinda annoying.

      --
      "What can a thoughtful man hope for mankind on Earth, given the experience of the past million years? Nothing." -Bokonon
    185. Re:Take back Slashdot by Himmy32 · · Score: 1

      Forgive my skepticism for improvement, since you were the person who let this tripe hit the front page yesterday

    186. Re:Take back Slashdot by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      My problem with Beta wasn't that it was different, it was that it was different and not better.

      I don't have a problem with change when that change is positive.

      I've been here for at least 17 years and I have seen numerous changes. Beta was an unmitigated disaster.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    187. Re:Take back Slashdot by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Yes, people are treating this like it's complicated, but it really isn't. There is already some level of Unicode support in there. What is needed is to simply permit a few characters that show up again and again in copypasta.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    188. Re:Take back Slashdot by Lab+Rat+Jason · · Score: 1

      I think I may have posted AC only once, and it was out of curiosity if I would get notifications about ranking/responses. As such, I'm not a big fan of the AC feature... but I see how others like it, so I propose these two things I think I'd like to see:1 if you post AC, moderations to your AC comments should be applied to your Karma... You should be free to speak anonymously, but I should still be able to tell you your opinion is shit. And 2: a proper spam mod option, which should then be connected to a proper ML spam filtering system. It took WAY too long for the stupid "you're all cows" bullshit to end!

      --
      Which has more power: the hammer, or the anvil?
    189. Re:Take back Slashdot by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I sometimes post AC myself on a topic I want to know more about to incite knowledgeable people to inform me for example.

      You mean, you troll? Because there's nothing stopping you from leaving a comment saying "hey, could someone explain so and so?" so the only reason not to attach your name would be if you were going to leave some inflammatory bullshit and you didn't want to harm your karma score.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    190. Re:Take back Slashdot by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      I know it's not old-slashdotty to be posting pictures and such, but it would just fit so neatly.

      The new Slashdot will allow us to post emoji and embedded video in our comments.

      Hail Slashdot!

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    191. Re:Take back Slashdot by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      The only thing you accomplish that way is a bloated user database with tons of throwaway accounts cluttering it.

      Have you seen the UIDs here?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    192. Re:Take back Slashdot by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Firehose itself is pretty new, an attempt to turn slashdot into Digg.

      '07 is not exactly the dawn of Slashdot history, but it's also not "new" any more.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    193. Re:Take back Slashdot by Lab+Rat+Jason · · Score: 1

      I've already commented... so I can't mod you up... but +1 on this. Which by the way makes me think that perhaps I should suggest... I get not modding on a thread you've commented on... but the entire comments section? I think maybe you shouldn't be able to mod the tree you've commented in, but the rest of the comments are fair game... sometimes I want to mod someone UP, and still comment. But I guess I don't know the reasons behind why that rule exists, so maybe I'm off.

      --
      Which has more power: the hammer, or the anvil?
    194. Re:Take back Slashdot by mvdwege · · Score: 1

      Dude, as long the mangy buzzard is an influential member of your team, you're fucked. Anyone not wanting his Breitbart-level kookery will eventually leave your site.

      --
      "I know I will be modded down for this": where's the option '-1, Asking for it'?
    195. Re:Take back Slashdot by thechemic · · Score: 1

      Thank you for making Applehu Akbar's point for him. Very kind of you AC.

      --
      Let's make like a bird... and get the flock outta here.
    196. Re:Take back Slashdot by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I long ago concluded that sourceforge was most often the place that good ideas go to die. Full of orphaned or half-finished products.

      Welcome to the interwebs. Guess what? That's what is mostly out there, dead dreams. At best, most of them are zombies, shuffling along in a sort of half-dead state. Occasionally, someone does something with them.

      The good news is that those projects aren't really using up any resources, and meanwhile they're there for anyone who can benefit from them.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    197. Re:Take back Slashdot by chihowa · · Score: 1

      APK has some pretty good posts, every once in a while. I wouldn't mind if he stopped with the stalking and the multiple long link-ridden copy-pasted replies that pollute some threads, though.

      --
      If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
    198. Re:Take back Slashdot by Lab+Rat+Jason · · Score: 1

      +1x10^23 I haven't been on SourceForge for years for this exact reason!

      --
      Which has more power: the hammer, or the anvil?
    199. Re:Take back Slashdot by mvdwege · · Score: 1

      And to make it perfectly fucking clear how fucked you are: you actually cited Breitbart on the Hugo Awards. As long as you pull that shit, you will struggle.

      --
      "I know I will be modded down for this": where's the option '-1, Asking for it'?
    200. Re:Take back Slashdot by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 1

      The filters existed to get rid of his stories.

      Can't forget the hellmouth Buffy connections. He would need to update his references. Maybe relate school shootings to Mockingjay or Twilight.

    201. Re:Take back Slashdot by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Slashdot is large. It has a decent proportion of people with those views, but also a decent proportion of people telling them they're idiots, especially when it comes to CC denialism.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    202. Re:Take back Slashdot by pr0fessor · · Score: 1

      "News for Nerds" means you will likely be graded harshly for duplicate posts and summaries that are poorly drafted. Nerds are difficult at best to please. The word news itself implies something new and this crowd makes new for a living. It sounds like you will have a lot of work.

    203. Re: Take back Slashdot by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 1

      At least I know how to spell lead.

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    204. Re:Take back Slashdot by chihowa · · Score: 1

      So Slashdot is a pretty obvious money sink, but it does have a desirable reading audience, many of whom are absurdly vocal about how they don't want to read ads, subscribe or otherwise do anything that would, you know, make the site profitable.

      The first easy fix for monetization is fixing the subscription system. I don't care for ads at all, but I've always paid for a subscription here (until it stopped working). Turning down cold hard cash (and basically hiding the existence of the subscription system) always seemed like a strange approach to making money from the site.

      I know that modern businesses seem to think that the world runs on ads, but there are simpler and more profitable means of paying for things.

      --
      If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
    205. Re:Take back Slashdot by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

      I was here for beta.

      The thing with plain CSS and letting *us* theme it is that it can look the exact same.

      It can also look different.

    206. Re:Take back Slashdot by JazzLad · · Score: 1

      I don't have nearly enough to say to post more often, but I'd like to see Karma be a factor in how often too - I won't name names, but I am aware of at least 1 or 2 users that I follow that occasionally bump into silly limits (wait X before posting again / no more posts today) - their Karma is excellent.

      --
      "If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear." - Every fascist, ever
    207. Re:Take back Slashdot by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

      I hate to break it to you, 'nerds' have moved on in the last ~20 years. Not all nerds know HTML.

      I haven't written HTML in a decade (other than on Slashdot). Restructured Text, was invented for a reason.

    208. Re:Take back Slashdot by omnichad · · Score: 1

      - Allow older accounts...: Ohh you used a free web site longer then someone else. Go pat yourself on the back, and bask in your mountains of participation trophies.

      The point is that it's not an account that was run up to good karma recently. I'm not sure "older" has to mean "from the early days. But karma alone may not be enough.

    209. Re:Take back Slashdot by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      How can you be persecuted for anything you say? Just create a bew account!

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    210. Re:Take back Slashdot by JazzLad · · Score: 2

      Finally introduce a "-1, Factually Incorrect" mod.

      I would love to see this coupled with signing mods - but only in the case of this mod. If I am expert enough in a field to call someone out as "Factually Incorrect" I should be willing to identify myself (but only for that mod and initially there should be a notification asking 'are you sure?' giving mods that don't pay enough attention to change their mind). Oh, and an 'undo mod' within 20 seconds of modding would be great! No more 'posting to undo accidental mod' posts.

      --
      "If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear." - Every fascist, ever
    211. Re:Take back Slashdot by ShaunC · · Score: 1

      Every now and then, I run into a bug where I see the upcoming stories highlighted in red even though I'm not a subscriber. I've gotten a few good +5 FP's in that way, having a few minutes to write up a comment while the story is hidden to most people. I don't think I'd pay just for that capability, but I bet some folks would.

      --
      Thanks to the War on Drugs, it's easier to buy meth than it is to buy cold medicine!
    212. Re:Take back Slashdot by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

      I would say there should be room for a middle ground.

      Maybe 60 seconds to edit a post to catch any quick typos.

    213. Re:Take back Slashdot by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Good please make sure that all political posts are kept in the political section and allow me to hide them.
      Slashdot IMHO is not good at anything political.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    214. Re:Take back Slashdot by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

      I just realized what I miss most on Reddit is AC.

      ACs are the wild card of posting.

      And I've certainly posted as AC when Slashdot has talked about my company/industry.

    215. Re:Take back Slashdot by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      While you're not entirely incorrect, you are spectacularly pretentious.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    216. Re:Take back Slashdot by takyon · · Score: 1

      I'll take your criticism over isolated mistakes into account, and you can enjoy your daily cesspool of sponsored content and ads.

    217. Re:Take back Slashdot by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      Do you understand what 'throw away account' means? There is no way for anyone to connect your discarded account to your active one. There's nothing special about AC posting.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    218. Re:Take back Slashdot by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

      Firehose new? Heh, I remember it being introduced like 7 or 8 years ago :)

    219. Re:Take back Slashdot by tkrotchko · · Score: 1

      But he's right.

      AC is a cherished part of the internet, /. included.

      --
      You were mistaken. Which is odd, since memory shouldn't be a problem for you
    220. Re:Take back Slashdot by tkrotchko · · Score: 1

      "Firehose itself is pretty new"

      At least 10 years old, perhaps longer.

      --
      You were mistaken. Which is odd, since memory shouldn't be a problem for you
    221. Re:Take back Slashdot by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      Wait, Slashdot BETA is dead?

      Damn, now I'm going to have to change my signature!

      CURSE YOU, NEW SLASHDOT OVERLORDS!!

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    222. Re:Take back Slashdot by PDG · · Score: 1

      I miss the days of CmdrTaco :-(

      --
      "Where is my mind?"
    223. Re:Take back Slashdot by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      Anonymity serves an incredibly useful purpose - not just here either. In the press, we have an idea of an anonymous source, and quotes that aren't for attribution. In legal circles, there are 'unsigned letters' which allow someone to put an opinion out that may not be popular, without jeopardizing the rest of their career.

      Yes, anonymous coward can be abused to troll people, but it can also be used to be a dissenting voice of reason when reason isn't popular.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    224. Re:Take back Slashdot by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Oh dear, we seem to have a nutjob. What is it about people like you? As soon as you see "Zoe Quinn" or "Brianna Wu" your brain short circuits and you start babbling incoherent crap.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    225. Re:Take back Slashdot by Loconut1389 · · Score: 1

      If it's alright with you, I sent you a LinkedIn connection just now. I understand if you decline, given your position, but I'd love to keep better tabs on what you're doing!

    226. Re:Take back Slashdot by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      For the love of everything holy, when 1 April rolls around, please don't waste the whole day on bullshit nonsense like the previous curators did. Every other site already becomes useless on that day, let's keep some actual content here.

      That's not to say that you can't have a bit of fun - feel free. But don't go overboard like DiceDot.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    227. Re:Take back Slashdot by hey! · · Score: 1

      I don't mind the sponsored posts; I like the fact that they're in a different color rather than camouflaged as regular content. They're generally of no interest to me, but in return for consideration I make a point to at least skim the summaries to see if they might be of interest to me. I also appreciate that they don't use popups or intrusive DOM techniques that obscure content

      Sites like this, especially long-running ones, are kind of like a clubhouse; any changes to the clubhouse are bound to be controversial with the members. But in this case the members don't pay the fee; someone else pays for the upkeep. As long as a site is reasonable about how they present advertising I have no particular qualms with it.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    228. Re:Take back Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Get a room already.

    229. Re:Take back Slashdot by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      Who's using ad hominem, here? I conceded that some of your thinking was valid, but addressed the overall tone of your comment, which was you talking about the way you communicate. So I also commented on the way you come across in your communication.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    230. Re:Take back Slashdot by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1

      I don't believe it. What about the relentless left-wing social justice stories that blame nerds for everything wrong in the world? What about constant news-today-gone-tomorrow political stories that are general news, at best?

      When did the left-wing blame the nerds? Usually they target the anti-nerds: those pegged as right-wing, old, white, anti-science, religious, "out-of-touch" fossils.

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
    231. Re:Take back Slashdot by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      Which AJAXy one, D2 or Beta? The former's been the default for a decade or so, and when I asked Pudge about problems with the original classic UI he tended to be dismissive of people who still used it as a small minority.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    232. Re:Take back Slashdot by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      I'll be honest, the GGers won on this one, and I'd like to see posts about Google encouraging women into IT et al hit the bitbucket. The manbabies succeeded in effectively censoring all discussion of diversity in IT through shitposting and moderation abuse. The articles they post aren't for discussions.

      Plus, I'll be honest, I don't particularly like being reminded that a sizable contingent, possibly even a majority, of the people I work along side actually hate women, blacks, etc, and want them to do badly.

      I was happy believing the fantasy that we all believe in merit of solutions, the best winning, the worst losing, rather than in whose advocates argues loudest and with the most cruelty, and whose advocates are most easily intimidated out of our profession.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    233. Re:Take back Slashdot by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      Hate to break it to you but DICE did not start that particular tradition. That's been part of Slashdot for as long as I've been here, probably longer. The most infamous wasn't even under DICE's watch - OMG Ponies.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    234. Re:Take back Slashdot by khallow · · Score: 1

      You want a rightwing echo chamber, fuck off to Soylent.

      There's no nice way to put it, but this accusation is complete bullshit and the above poster, mvdwege probably knows that. Look at the main page. For example, here are the headlines posted from January 28:

      January 28 is Data Privacy Day. Do you know where your data is?
      FCC Says It Will âoeUnlock the Set-Top Boxâ
      Are You Fat? Blame Childhood Antibiotics
      Subtle Vulnerabilities with PHP and cURL
      Billionaire Boater Destroys almost 14,000 square feet of Reef in Cayman Islands

      Notice the complete absence of "rightwing echo chamber". Also notice that mvdwege hasn't actually posted on SoylentNews since August.

    235. Re:Take back Slashdot by The-Ixian · · Score: 1

      Yeah, same thing here. My lost the password to my first account and it was tied to an e-mail I no longer have. My current user name I created around '99 or so.

      --
      My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
    236. Re:Take back Slashdot by Jon+Abbott · · Score: 1

      Being one of the greybeards who still reads Slashdot, I'll add a few:

      - Add the ability to edit comments until they are moderated or have a reply
      - Stop linking to Forbes articles and posting Slashvertisements
      - Stop running articles about Martin Shkreli or other things that have nothing to do with "News for nerds"
      - For the love of all things absurd, please add CowboyNeal back as the final poll option
      - If you need money to operate the site, try asking for it from readers. That way you can reduce or eliminate advertising useless junk that nobody wants

    237. Re:Take back Slashdot by UpnAtom · · Score: 1

      Apart from gamifying karma, some golden advice here.

      all that Slashdot really has going for it is a (minority) smart readership and a superior comment rating system.

      Yes. "Don't read the comments" is well-known advice elsewhere on the internet. But here, I come for the comments.

    238. Re:Take back Slashdot by IronChef · · Score: 1

      I'm going to need the Hugh Pickens take on the Bennett Haselton situation.

    239. Re:Take back Slashdot by xevioso · · Score: 1

      The answer is a simple one, which sites like Daily Kos use, which is to require a delay after you make an account before you post. You can create an account, but you must wait three days before posting. This tends to discourage all but the most hardcore trolls.

    240. Re:Take back Slashdot by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      Oh, I know that. I've been lurking around here for 15 years now.

      But this is a time for change, and let's change that particular tradition into the dustbin of history.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    241. Re:Take back Slashdot by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      The best part is you have to keep reloading to see if I've taken the bait instead of getting a convenient email notification. :)

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    242. Re:Take back Slashdot by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      But what increment of anonymity does AC offer that our screen names don't?

    243. Re:Take back Slashdot by lucm · · Score: 1

      The book goes further than just rehashing the shaming events. As an example the author also investigates the reputation management business; those companies flood Google with fake blog posts and articles about their client to push down the damaging results to page 3 or 4 in search results.

      Hate to sound like his publicist but really any book by Jon Ronson is worth reading. I don't know to what extent everything he writes is accurate (as an example ICP deny most of what he said about their coming out) but he's quite thorough in his research and he writes well.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    244. Re:Take back Slashdot by lucm · · Score: 1

      Look again. In her speaking engagements there's nothing since 2013, and most of the stuff on her blog and youtube channel is at least a year old. Check her resume; nowadays she's doing stuff like part-time Zendesk training.

      The Donglegate destroyed her corporate career and she didn't turn her 15 minutes into a lasting business either.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    245. Re: Take back Slashdot by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      Creating a throw away account ties your IP to the posts you write among other things.

      That's already happening. AC doesn't mean "We don't record any of that".

      The posting IP is not visible to anybody except the Slashdot admins and everybody Snowden has finger-pointed. In fact, if you just use the 'post anonymously' button, as opposed to just not logging in, the account that was used to post that is recorded. They can just flip a switch and, boom, your logged in account is displayed with your comment. In that regard you're actually better off obfuscating that with another account.

      The fact that you think AC and a throw away account are the same tells me otherwise.

      The fact that you've hastily thrown together a shaky argument tells me my assertion was correct.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    246. Re:Take back Slashdot by cpm99352 · · Score: 1

      I support AC. I used to moderate extensively but ever since I gave +5 to "fuck beta" posts I lost my mod points. Don't know if I was somehow banned behind the scenes from moderation, but ever since then I've posted AC because there was no point in signing in.

      Slashdot moderation is unique, and far preferable to reddit.

      Please leave AC and moderation unchanged. Thanks!

    247. Re:Take back Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Maybe we should only allow anonymous posts from real accounts, so the drive-by AC's and lazy trolls can't abuse it.

      The words that ring out in my mind are "soft anonymity". Like I heard the phrase "soft torture" or "torture light" start flittering into my universe shortly after 9/11/1. That story seemed to evolve slipperily from "maybe we might waterboard a couple folks if we really need to" to "we're probabably waterboarding a couple of folks" to "yeah, well, we waterboarded this one guy 187 times and all we have to show for it is a new design for a vacuum cleaner".

      Imagine a world where a clone of Hitler gets access to the database of information unmasking every AC comment on slashdot ever. Then assigning a division of beurocrats to harrass the people whom he suspects to be potential future threats to his long term grip on power.

      No, "soft anonymity" or "anonymity lite" is not the right answer.

    248. Re:Take back Slashdot by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      The last talk posted on they link I gave was in 2015.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    249. Re:Take back Slashdot by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      Some people don't use screen names. Their "slashdot ID" is their actual name, and they've been here for 17+ years.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    250. Re:Take back Slashdot by KGIII · · Score: 1

      If you are unwilling to stand behind your beliefs and accept persecution for them, you didn't really believe in them.

      Do not take that the wrong way. I'm glad that you can post as an AC. I'd not have it any other way. It just means that you don't believe in your views enough to put your UUID them and be held accountable for them at even that level. That would be why they're called "cowards." I quite agree with the idea.

      Not everyone has beliefs strong enough to get the past the stage of cowardice. That's fine. The world is full of cowards. Most people are cowards, so it seems by observation. Push come to shove, will you accept the death penalty for saying your boss is a wanker? No? Then you don't really hold that belief, at least not to the level where it is significant.

      That's okay. You don't have to. You're allowed to be a coward and I'm glad you're given a voice.

      At a personal level, I not only like being held accountable, I want to be held accountable. It encourages me to use logic, reason, and hold viable beliefs. I like accountability and I think we'd be better off if more people did. However, I'd never want to force you to post with attribution. Instead, I'd encourage you to do so while being sure to let you know that being cowardly is a normal human trait and something to overcome.

      I truly like being accountable for my views and expressions. That accountability is what makes the freedom and liberty so valuable in the end.

      I am not a religious person, certainly not a Christian, but I think the appropriate quote is: "More weight."

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    251. Re:Take back Slashdot by WoOS · · Score: 1

      - Allow older accounts who have good standing being able to post faster. The 4 minute time-out is archaic compared to reddit

      Write comments thoughtful enough to take longer than 4 minutes to write. Like this ;-)

      TL;DR: We have enough "I wish I had mod points" and other one-liners. No need to add a mechanisms to get more of them even if you think you would never use it that way.

    252. Re:Take back Slashdot by budgenator · · Score: 1

      Back in the day, an AC post was almost unused unless someone had inside information that an employer or government would have found uncomfortable and would be likely to retaliate against the poster for divulging; Now it's just a "I'm too lazy to register an account" thing. It really undermines the user moderation system and makes the comment notices ineffective, basically gutting what makes /. /. Maybe if we made posting anonymously without having logged in from a registered account watch do an advertiser's activity like on pandora or watch a youtube style ad, it would cut down these Drive-by Anonymous Cowards, additionally if you post AC from an account, any moderation should count for or against you.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    253. Re:Take back Slashdot by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Now imagine it tenfold.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    254. Re:Take back Slashdot by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      And all but the most hardcore trolls like the cow guy, the tireless goatse enthusiast (who hasn't even noticed that his link goes into link nirvana, btw), the Golden Girls dufus or ... I don't dare say his name but he peddles his software here frequently ... are not really a problem.

      What nondescript one-off troll has ever been a problem for /.? Be honest. And the guys mentioned above would simply register a battery of accounts to fire away when they feel like it. A three day waiting period doesn't apply to them. They simply plan ahead and register three days worth of throwaway accounts beforehand.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    255. Re: Take back Slashdot by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      I don't know why people get that impression from those articles. They are not blaming you, unless you are some kind of arsehole.

      Please keep them coming, they are useful and interesting and people who don't like them can just skip to the next post.

      Don't try to shut down views and speech you disagree with, just because it irritates you. Be tolerant.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    256. Re:Take back Slashdot by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      I mentioned Unicode because I just want proper umlaut support -- While I'm not as crotchety as you, I agree -- I couldn't give a fuck about emoji codes either.

      i.e. I just want /. to not fuck up when displaying:

      * GÃdel, Escher, Bach -> Godel ...
      * ÃoeberStandard (for audio ripping) -> UberStandard

      Ignoring glyphs -- in 2016 -- won't make them go away.

    257. Re:Take back Slashdot by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      I post as AC sometimes, when I want to say something anonymously.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    258. Re:Take back Slashdot by goarilla · · Score: 1

      You mean, you troll? Because there's nothing stopping you from leaving a comment saying "hey, could someone explain so and so?" so the only reason not to attach your name would be if you were going to leave some inflammatory bullshit and you didn't want to harm your karma score.

      Yes and No, I don't want to be attacked personally for being ignorant. But yes occasionally I do vent provocative vitriol (not always as AC though). And for that I would like to apologize.

    259. Re:Take back Slashdot by flopsquad · · Score: 1

      It was a PITA when I owned an android phone as well. Maybe I should've said "mobile device."

      The main issue isn't that Steve Jobs' ghost is guarding the gate to the walled garden. It's that using a touch interface for navigating and inputting symbol-heavy text (angle brackets, for starts) is noticeably slower. Not having to manually type in HTML tags would go a long way toward mobile usability, regardless of the OS.

      --
      Nothing posted to /. has ever been legal advice, including this.
    260. Re:Take back Slashdot by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      I don't understand this attitude. Even if you really must browse at -1 all the time, he's so easy to ignore and text takes so little bandwidth, is it really worth trying to censor someone just to increase your comfort level slightly?

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    261. Re:Take back Slashdot by sootman · · Score: 1

      I like that you're here and participating in the discussion. I have a lot of ideas of how to make the site better (both to my own standards and to a large portion of the community's) BUT I won't bother to list them because I'm sure others will make all the same suggestions, and I'm sure other others will suggest the opposite in each case. And for those that everyone agrees on, there are probably technical hurdles to overcome. :-/ But in the unlikely event that you're short of ideas, feel free to reach out and I can totally help you fix this place. :-)

      Come to think of it, you should go ahead and post a story: "What would you do to fix Slashdot?" I'd leave a comment there.

      I can appreciate the difficulty of the task that lies ahead of you and the rest of the team and I wish you all well. I hope you're able to run a successful site without having to resort to sensational stories and infinitely obnoxious ads. I know it can't be easy to make money from a million angry, twitch-posting, ad-blocking nerds.

      That said, make a nice T-shirt and I'll buy it. Basic black with a green / and a white . for $25... sold.

      Good luck!

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    262. Re: Take back Slashdot by WoOS · · Score: 2

      And maybe we (yes, we!) can cut back on uselessly exagerated, ridiculing strawmen to derise a non-agreed opinion. Just because other people's posts seem to be completely stupid doesn't mean they require hateful responses. One could just ignore them.
      I at least promise to do so. As a new year's eve resolution. Of next year.

      Why did I post this? Because although I remember some news stories on women in tech (which I might have agreed with or not), I can't remember any story implying "everyone in your industry are chauvenists assholes and you owe us a place in your ranks". Let's stay at the facts.

    263. Re:Take back Slashdot by TimothyDavis · · Score: 1

      Say it right the first time your reply to your own post.

      Where is "mod: +1 ironic" when you need it?

    264. Re:Take back Slashdot by unixisc · · Score: 1

      I really, really hope this is good news. I miss the actual "News for nerds" ethos that brought me here, and I've waded through a lot of sponsored "posts" and clickbait to sift out the kernels of actual news that remain.

      New /. overlords? Get this site back to "News for nerds" and news that matters, and you'll keep me here.

      I quite agree. I want to see more stories on different technology issues and platforms - be it Linux, Windows, BSD, Intel, Apple, Google and less on things that just happen to use Technology, such as Uber or Facebook or Twitter. Also, I'd like to see less political stories, and also, less non-technology science (read: global warming, zika virus, Flint water supply, et al). Not much interested in the bio-sciences or genetics either.

    265. Re:Take back Slashdot by KGIII · · Score: 1

      ‘’¥×öóíúüëéåßðfhïøøñb®©ææ£¾÷ÄÅÉËÜÚÍÓÓÖ“ÁÐFGHÏØ

      Etc... (Those should all work.) I haven't learned where they all are in this layout. Euro is in there somewhere. You can also do stuff like "& l t ;" (sans quotes and spaces) and get < and stuff like that.

      'Snot really all that hard to get much of the functionality. Hmm... I think it's UTF actually? I don't think it's ASCII. I think there's a whitelist and that the U+12345 doesn't work to insert them or something along those lines. € There it is... It is right alt + 5 € and left alt + shift + 4 is £. Left alt + the - is the ¥ (© ® ½¾ and things like that.)

      The symbols for micro (as in microgram) and paragraph are on my edit screen but do not show. The power doesn't show, so no 4^3 or the likes.

      The whole list isn't on the whitelist but some are. The insertion method matters - you can't do U+FOO but have to use the keyboard layout insertion method. But, you get to do it, to some extent, for the ones you mentioned (which quotes?) but that limited subset works well enough. I've been using Linux for a while now and haven't found a keyboard layout that I like as well as I like the US International on Windows. I've not bothered figuring out how to edit and make my own. Suffice to say, I've not learned all of them - even though I've been at it for a while. I know the important ones that I use. € £ © ® and whatnot. You can just set up the keyboard and then make sure it's default (don't delete the original - set it to secondary and not default) and then just poke at it. It's otherwise normal so it doesn't mess with your usual typing. The Windows keyboard layout can do so - hitting the ' means you need to hit space after it or it may post an unintended character. You adjust pretty quickly.

      I figured it out quite by accident and then someone mentioned the whitelist aspect not too long ago. I'd been doing it for years without realizing that it was something odd - until I spent time in Linux and tried to use the U+FOO method. So, at that point, I just went looking for, and found, the various international layouts. There are quite a few and you can probably find more. You can also probably edit and make your own. I just haven't bothered - it's easier to just learn a slightly revamped system as I need it than it is to bother making my own.

      Also, I have no idea why more are not whitelisted. I understand the approach, I just don't know why they selected the set they did select. Micro and exponential values would be good. Not even the & sup3 ; method works.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    266. Re:Take back Slashdot by pope1 · · Score: 1

      ^--- This! Remove the 4 minute wait.

      --
      /* * pope1 */
    267. Re:Take back Slashdot by mvdwege · · Score: 1

      Yeah sure, a single incident. Nice bit of epistemic closure you're showing there.

      --
      "I know I will be modded down for this": where's the option '-1, Asking for it'?
    268. Re:Take back Slashdot by whipslash · · Score: 1

      That's a good idea. We will post a story like that soon.

    269. Re:Take back Slashdot by unixisc · · Score: 1

      I hope that at some point, the new /. allows us to edit our posts to fix major typos. Also, if some level of Unicode support is there, that would be good. Also, going forward, I hope that /. becomes available on IPv6 as well.

    270. Re:Take back Slashdot by mvdwege · · Score: 1

      Also notice that mvdwege hasn't actually posted on SoylentNews since August.

      I wonder why that is? Nothing to do with blind parrotting of the Rabid Puppies and Breitbart around the Hugos, of course not.

      --
      "I know I will be modded down for this": where's the option '-1, Asking for it'?
    271. Re:Take back Slashdot by KGIII · · Score: 1

      You mean £ € ñ é and the likes? See my previous post, just prior to this one, and you too will have the magic. (Use the keyboard.)

      Only a subset are supported and input method matters. However, it does French, Spanish, the Euro, Pound, and even ¥ if you want to get fancy.

      You just have to know The Keyboard Magic© or follow The Path to Enlightenment® and you too can be a Slashdot Wizard. 'Snot really hard - I can figure it out.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    272. Re:Take back Slashdot by whipslash · · Score: 1

      Good call.

    273. Re:Take back Slashdot by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      Yeah, because entering the Captcha is so much easier.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    274. Re:Take back Slashdot by shawn2772 · · Score: 1

      I hate to break it to you, 'nerds' have moved on in the last ~20 years. Not all nerds know HTML.

      I didn't say "If you don't know HTML, you don't belong here", I said "If you can't figure out how to format your post with HTML, you don't belong here". Nerds can learn a few markup tags, if they don't already know them.

    275. Re:Take back Slashdot by Chehalden · · Score: 1

      I am not sure I even ever logged in since the sale to DICE, just wasn't worth the effort.

    276. Re:Take back Slashdot by ratboy666 · · Score: 1

      But I love APK!

      The power of the hostfile compels you!
      The power of the hostfile compels you!

      um.. you get it.

      --
      Just another "Cubible(sic) Joe" 2 17 3061
    277. Re:Take back Slashdot by lucm · · Score: 1

      The last talk posted on they link I gave was in 2015.

      Are you talking about the March 2015 video of her talk at the "Lesbian Who Tech 2015 SF Summit" (no kidding)? Because that's the only activity on her blog or Youtube channel in 2015. Before that there's ONE post in 2014, and before that it's all Donglegate and before.

      I don't know what you're trying to prove but someone who gave ONE talk in the 3 years since her SJW moment and who does Zendesk training for a living is not someone who leveraged her 15 minutes of fame successfully. How the fuck do you go from an important role at Sendgrid to doing Zendesk macros tutorials, that's a nosedive if I've ever seen one.

      You'd think that she learned from all of this, but no. When she was interviewed by Jon Ronson recently she said that the guy who was fired following her public shaming should have kept his mouth shut about it, that he's the one to blame for her becoming a social pariah.

      Just to recap: the guy made a joke to his friend during a conference, she overhead and took a picture and posted it (without ever talking to them) because she felt "threatened" (in the 400+ crowd), the guys apologized but she went on, prancing around on TV and blogs and panels to discuss the incident, and when the guy got fired he made ONE short statement about it on Reddit (mostly an apology) and she's blaming her downfall on that.

      I don't think shaming the shamer is a proper response, but really, fuck her.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    278. Re:Take back Slashdot by istartedi · · Score: 1

      Holy shucking fit, that's brilliant.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    279. Re:Take back Slashdot by acid_andy · · Score: 1

      Dude, you spelt libertarian wrong.

      --
      Your ad here.
    280. Re:Take back Slashdot by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      +1
      +1
      +1
      +1

      (Blah blah blahblahblah yadda yadda blah blah added to blah blah the blahblah lameness filter, no blahblah less!)

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    281. Re:Take back Slashdot by Shoten · · Score: 1

      Please, please, please... No more Bennett Haselton monologs!

      In other news, Bennett Haselton stood there dumbfounded, his cock still slick with the saliva of DHI as it gradually dried in the open air for the first time in years.

      --

      For your security, this post has been encrypted with ROT-13, twice.
    282. Re:Take back Slashdot by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      I've offered my services before. They know how to get in touch.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    283. Re:Take back Slashdot by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 2

      +1, Awesome.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    284. Re:Take back Slashdot by DerekLyons · · Score: 2

      It's not a guaranteed -1 flamebait anymore, no. But it's still not likely to be heard unless the reader is browsing a +1 or +2 (essentially reading the unmoderated posts).

      But it's not just Gamergate and feminism. (The latter is still likely to be moderated down. /. really is a He-man Woman Haters Club most days.) It's politics (conservatives, even if not of the flaming nutjob variety), and philosophy (don't dare question FOSS), and cults of personality (don't even think about not gushing about Musk), and... so many other things. Etc.. etc...

      Meta-moderation, over the long run, hasn't really made things better - because the inmates are running the asylum either way.

    285. Re:Take back Slashdot by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      BBCode should also probably be on that list as an input option, ideally with a nice button-based interface for people who don't want to have to mess with typing markup while they write comments.

      You can use a button interface with HTML too... but yes, this needs to be fixed. Along with it's general unfriendliness to anything that isn't a desktop browser, Slashdot's infrastructure is trapped in 1997.

    286. Re:Take back Slashdot by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      Do you just ignore the comment rating slider at the upper-right of the conversation area

      I use the classic view because that "comment rating slider" will show score 0 posts, but not score -1. You can't properly moderate without seeing all the posts.

    287. Re:Take back Slashdot by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Non-sequitur, assuming facts not in evidence, and citation needed! Well, I mean, really... ;-)

      Not that my reply negates your post or anything, it's just that I kind of felt obligated. Then again, I actually value good debate because I might learn something new and if I can't defend my views then I should not hold those views. I am not unique in that but it is a rare trait.

      Alas, I used up a bunch of my post count last night, have people to reply to, and so I'll just post this as an AC. I'd leave you to guess who this is but, I am afraid, my writing style is a bit unique so I'm probably easy to pick out of a crowd. Try as I might, I seem unable to change it.

      At least it's not one of my novellas. At any rate, this is Slashdot. Childish (and poor) debating is kind of what we do. I'm pretty sure my choice of OS and browser is better than yours and that you're a poopy head for not thinking the same thing. Unless, of course, you do think the same thing - in which case, I must change my choices! (And then pretend that's what I'd been using all along.)

      Wait, no... It is one of my novellas! Damn it. Nah, it's not that long, really.

      KGIII (AC 'cause Slashdot is a poopy head with poopy head, arbitrary, limits on post counts.)

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    288. Re:Take back Slashdot by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Me too. Posting as AC is the only way a lot of posters can be honest without having their karma modded into the dirt by assholes who treat the troll mod as a disagree mod.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    289. Re:Take back Slashdot by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Bullshit. Posting AC is the only way to keep your karma from tanking every time you disagree with the conventional groupthink on this site. Good luck keeping decent karma around here if you criticize OSS or Linux and can't post at least some of it AC. Too many people think a troll is anyone who disagrees with them.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    290. Re:Take back Slashdot by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Shit, I've been modded to -1 just for saying that FOSS isn't all it's cracked up to be.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    291. Re:Take back Slashdot by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      so the only reason not to attach your name would be if you were going to leave some inflammatory bullshit and you didn't want to harm your karma score.

      Only if by "inflammatory bullshit" you mean "anything the majority on /. doesn't want to hear." Try criticizing some of the sacred cows around here without using AC and see how long it takes your karma to tank. Here's a hint: Not fucking long.

      I used to avoid posting AC, until I got tired of dealing with having poor karma all the time just because I think FOSS is overrated.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    292. Re:Take back Slashdot by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Amen. It used to be a lot better when modders could get called out for treating troll mods as their own personal "I disagree" button.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    293. Re:Take back Slashdot by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Really, you aren't going to get "most hated man on the internet" just by writing a long stream-of-semiconsciousness and blackmailing an editor to publish it.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    294. Re:Take back Slashdot by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      It has indeed been around for a long time. Some years much, much better than others. Unfortunately, over time, things got much less subtle, and far too repetitive.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    295. Re:Take back Slashdot by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Now it's just a "I'm too lazy to register an account" thing.

      No, it's more commonly used as a "I'm going to express an opinion that may be unpopular here and I don't want my karma kicked into the dirt for not agreeing with the majority" thing.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    296. Re:Take back Slashdot by Mr.+Shotgun · · Score: 1

      APK has some pretty good posts, every once in a while.

      Wait you mean he's human? I thought it was just the world's worst spam bot. Now I am picturing him as some Ted Kaczynski guy up in the woods tying up his manifesto into his hosts file, just waiting for the world to recognize his genius.

      --
      Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the (supposed) good of its victims may be the most oppressive
    297. Re:Take back Slashdot by KGIII · · Score: 1

      I seem to recollect that you and I have had that exact conversation - up to and including the idea of fluid dynamic modeling. I have, alas, still not allowed myself to search for her and I still don't know what she looks like. If I have seen an image of her, I do not know it. No, I will not click any links provided after this - I kind of enjoy being able to say that I don't know what she looks like. I don't even really know who she is, where she came from, or what she does. I do hear about her. I know she exists (and might be a snookie or something similar - I'm not actually sure what one of those is).

      I presume she is famous and I presume that's due to television or music (or both). Given the number of references to her ass, I'm inclined to look but I just can't bring myself to do so. I will remain curious but not curious enough to look. I have no idea if it's a nice pooper. I have no idea if it is large or how large it is. I don't know her hair color, race, or face. I do know her name. I kind of value this ignorance. I value it enough to not satisfy my curiosity. I also value it enough to not actually work on this project - as tempting as it is.

      I believe we can get the measurements by using some photographs. We simply need to know the dimensions of something else in the photograph. A standard door's height is 6' 8" (IIRC) and that's for an internal and residential door. Assuming someone can find that in a photograph they can work out the dimensions of there. We'll need some elasticity numbers and some mass numbers. I believe that we can get the former from using scaled video and using presumptive modeling techniques. I'd look into that.

      So, if we can get some elasticity and dimension information, we can probably make an adequate prediction of mass. Given that she should have a known center of gravity, if we can find some images of her where we can see the angle of her legs and feet positioning (while she's otherwise balanced) we can make even more refined estimates about mass - probably as good as we could get even if allowed physical access (unless they'll allow for dissection but I am assuming that is illegal).

      Now, with those numbers, we can actually figure out surface tension, create the model, and then do some reasonable number crunching and get some meaningful data. You, for instance, want to know about seismic activity. We can now find depth of the crack and tendencies for motion retention based on the data and models. How far down the rabbit hole do you want to go? We can probably use a variety of images and get even more data. For instance, does she have a camel toe image? We could then make some measurements, and we'll have to use averages as I'm assumed we're disallowed volumetric data, but we could probably find out the predicted amount of seismic activity for a known quantity and release of gas. We can then model, predict, and reasonably authoritatively state "how much her ass shakes when she queefs."

      This can be done... I'm just not going to render any material assistance to this project. I can, if abstracted enough, help you with some math. That's as far as I go but the above should be an adequate methodology. It will likely not be 100% perfect but adequate for our needs and enough to show predictive qualities and thus author a paper and, so long as we include a method to test the predictions, we will even be reasonably scientific in our method. We could further show that we can predict (and measure - if allowed) how much rebounding motion is the expected output for a given amount of force. So, how well can she "shake that ass?" How "jiggly" is it when smacked?

      Again, I guess I can help with some of the math but I've not actually done any fluid dynamic modeling (in specific) but I could pick it up pretty quickly. There are scientific tools already out there in the community. I've stumbled across a few in my travels - albeit for very different reasons.

      Which leads me to this: Oh sure, we can get a paper out of this and the novelty will probably aid in getting

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    298. Re:Take back Slashdot by yoshi_mon · · Score: 1

      That sounds about right, thanks!

      --

      Really, I know what I'm doing...Ohhhh, look at the shiny buttons!
    299. Re:Take back Slashdot by imac.usr · · Score: 1

      HA-ha-ha! Promote that man.

      --
      I use Macs for work, Linux for education, and Windows for cardplaying.
    300. Re:Take back Slashdot by Reziac · · Score: 1

      In that case... leave well enough alone. Consider that the main reason slashdot got so big is because the site doesn't interfere with the users.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    301. Re:Take back Slashdot by Mal-2 · · Score: 1

      His articles usually come with tons of pretty pictures, suitable for making desktops. I used to like them for that, when I could easily read them, but I don't even bother trying now.

      --
      How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
    302. Re:Take back Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      As a 26yr old who loves the discussion and fun of /., I agree and disagree.

      I love not having to go to a ton of different sites to get my general news. I also love that /. has a bunch of crotchety old people who don't care about the trendyness. This makes /. a favorite place to read commentary on general news.

      On the other hand, if slashdot is all about general news, then what does /. have that Reddit or others don't? I like having nerd related news. You know... News for nerds, stuff that matters to them. To me, give me some general news and some specialty stuff as a nerd and I'll find that I quite enjoy most of it.

      I don't want to hear about Cruz clashing with Trump (General news and reported on by Lee enterprises - a large publication parent company). I want to hear about why Cruz and Trump say Encryption is good or bad for citizens and how they want to see the EXECUTIVE BRANCH perform its duty to the physical world even through the digital universe (personally I believe that you have a bunch of idiots that are just being paraded by the parties like a horse show to get us to pick the winner, when the best horses are still in the field actually doing something useful). Both of these are still general news, but one matters to me and I can hope that /. will be sure to avoid at least one of them.

      Of course, HN is doing pretty good...

    303. Re:Take back Slashdot by shione · · Score: 1

      Heya, you posted AC but I hope you can still read this. Thanks for acknowledging my existence on here. That's the first time anyone has in all the time I've been here. Not that anyone needs to do that but that was nice. :) haha

      If youre just talking about the link to our journals on the posts we make, that is true we can get to our journal that way but that still shows that it is broken imo because its found in such a convulted way. Slashdot can't expect us to make a post or find one of our old ones just to get a link up to our journals or have us remember the direct link to type into the browser. On other sites theres usually links either in our account page or some other prominent location to navigate our own stuff and around the site. I don't know why our journals are hidden like this (or missed when they revamped the site) especially when slashdot started out as a journal.

      I thought maybe it was my browser but on a clean install of chrome without any addons, it is still the same. On the mobile phone it is even worse, even posts do not have the journal links.

    304. Re:Take back Slashdot by Grieviant · · Score: 1

      Oh dear, we seem to have a nutjob. What is it about people like you? As soon as you see "Zoe Quinn" or "Brianna Wu" your brain short circuits and you start babbling incoherent crap.

      Nah. It really is OK to point out the rather large difference between interviewing Stallman and Brianna Wu on a site that's ostensibly "news for nerds". It's left as an exercise for you to determine which of these individuals should have something of interest to say on the collection of topics that fall under that banner.

      Now serviscope, I can't help but notice you running around this thread lashing out at all the "nutjobs" who express dissatisfaction with the barrage of social justice fodder that's appeared on this site recently, and it isn't the first time you've done so. As I recall, you've shown yourself to be willfully ignorant of facts but heavy on finger-pointing and ideology. Who is the nutjob with an obsession here?

    305. Re:Take back Slashdot by PReDiToR · · Score: 1

      I have a shirt with this on from a good few years back... Remember ThinkGeek?

      --

      Do not meddle in the affairs of geeks for they are subtle and quick to anger
    306. Re:Take back Slashdot by ancientt · · Score: 1

      Ditto.

      I couldn't guess how many times I've checked the Post Anonymously box after re-reading a comment before posting.

      --
      B) Eliminate all the stupid users. This is frowned upon by society.
    307. Re:Take back Slashdot by Bugamn · · Score: 1

      I don't see that really helping, it would be trivial to get the "logged off AC" if they wanted to spam.

    308. Re:Take back Slashdot by Reziac · · Score: 1

      You can post anonymously even if you're a logged-in user. And the system knows who you are regardless (frex, you still can't post and mod in the same discussion). Tho I don't know how mods affect posts made thus.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    309. Re:Take back Slashdot by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Yep nutjob.

      AmiMojo simply commented that he liked both of those interviews and that's all he said. You then flipped out because OMG Brianna Wu WTFHAX!!11!!11oneONELEVENone!1

      It really is OK to point out the rather large difference between interviewing Stallman and Brianna Wu on a site that's ostensibly "news for nerds".

      Except you didn't do that. You took AmiMojo to task for somehow equating Stallman and Wu even though he did no such thing. Given you couldn't understand what AmiMojo said and seem to have forgotten what you yourself said, I can only assume that the mention of Wu really fried your brain.

      and it isn't the first time you've done so.

      Indeed not and I shall keep doing so. The fact that the mere mention of Wu completely nukes any capability for rational thought in your brain indicated I still have plenty of work to do.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    310. Re:Take back Slashdot by gnupun · · Score: 1

      It just means that you don't believe in your views enough to put your UUID them and be held accountable for them at even that level. That would be why they're called "cowards.

      The way slashdot calls these anonymous people "cowards" seems like a bit of double standards to me. Why doesn't /. show the UUID of the people who mod a post up or down and their rationale for voting the way they did? Hiding mod identity is pure hypocrisy.

    311. Re:Take back Slashdot by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Hmm... It could simply be a UI issue or it could be that they've not thought to make the information public? I have no idea but I do have a surprise for you.

      I still get mod points but not as often anymore. I've not changed much of anything so I'm assuming that it's intended, over time, to stop giving moderation points to people who do not use them. Yup... I haven't spent a moderation point in a lot of years. It just felt wrong. I didn't like doing it. So, I don't mod and the system seems to have figured that out. I'm kind of surprised.

      Maybe we can call them moderating cowards? I can get behind that. No, seriously, I haven't moderated a soul in years now.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    312. Re:Take back Slashdot by cwsumner · · Score: 1

      we're listening to you guys.

      Now I know Slashdot is in trouble...

      Um... What did that guy say about "cynical, suspicious, curmudgeony lot..."?
        8-)

    313. Re:Take back Slashdot by whipslash · · Score: 1

      My first inclination is actually to give the users more say in what makes the front page, and other editorial matters. Thoughts?

    314. Re:Take back Slashdot by whipslash · · Score: 1

      Can you re-send? I've gotten hundreds

    315. Re:Take back Slashdot by whipslash · · Score: 1

      Currently working on Slashdot Gamma.... jk

    316. Re:Take back Slashdot by Reziac · · Score: 1

      As you can see my my UID, I'm an old fart on this site. Apparently I'm pretty much satisfied with how things are!

      I use Slashdot as my daily news source, so I'm fine with the broad spectrum of stories, tho I know some people would prefer it was entirely tech stuff.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    317. Re:Take back Slashdot by khallow · · Score: 1

      I wonder why that is? Nothing to do with blind parrotting of the Rabid Puppies and Breitbart around the Hugos, of course not.

      I think that says it all right there. One issue poster, that would be you, decides SoylentNews is a "rightwing echo chamber" because not everyone there had the right opinion on gamergate.

    318. Re:Take back Slashdot by Grieviant · · Score: 1

      The fact that the mere mention of Wu completely nukes any capability for rational thought in your brain indicated I still have plenty of work to do.

      I gave a factually accurate statement about why Wu isn't an interesting interviewee for slashdot or any other tech focused site. Despite the gnashing of teeth and the fact that you seem to view yourself as her personal bulldog, you didn't provide any refutation to what I said. Nor can you.

      The bolded text says it all about who's being rational and who's an extremist with an axe to grind.

    319. Re:Take back Slashdot by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Only if by "inflammatory bullshit" you mean "anything the majority on /. doesn't want to hear." Try criticizing some of the sacred cows around here without using AC and see how long it takes your karma to tank. Here's a hint: Not fucking long.

      I criticize anyone and everyone, and my karma is excellent. Maybe your comments just aren't as good as you think they are.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    320. Re:Take back Slashdot by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Citation needed for an opinion :)
      OK then - "I think so" - me.
      Some stuff I listed above just annoys me but your mileage may vary.

    321. Re:Take back Slashdot by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      +1 to Markdown, and with code-centric extensions, ideally, a la StackOverflow or Github. This is a site for geeks. By its very nature it does (or should) invite posts with code, console output etc.

    322. Re:Take back Slashdot by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      What hasn't become an echo chamber?

      Personally, to me, Slashdot feels like less echo'y than average today.

    323. Re:Take back Slashdot by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2

      I'd pay just to get the comment limit ("You have exceeded the maximum number ...") and the rate limiter both go away.

    324. Re:Take back Slashdot by justthinkit · · Score: 1

      Thanks for your thoughts

      --
      I come here for the love
    325. Re:Take back Slashdot by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      I gave a factually accurate statement about why Wu isn't an interesting interviewee

      Well your nutjobbery or arrogance is strong enough that you thing "opinion" and "factually accurate" are the same thing. Also you did no such thing. You flipped your shit when AmiMojo dared mention her name in the same sentence as RMS. You're now desperately scrambling to post-rationalise your actions.

      you seem to view yourself as her personal bulldog,

      More example of extremist nutjobbery: apparently me calling you out on bullshit is the same as me being a "bulldog" for Wu. Also that is a classic ad-homenim: attack the person not the message[*]. It's that basically you cannot conceive of a situation where someone might have found the interview interesting therefore you have to invent all sorts of motivations as to why that person is WRONG.

      Full of hate you are. Lead you to the dark side it will.

      [*] No, I'm not engaging in ad-home when I insult you. I'm saying your arguments are stupid therefore you'e an idiot. Ad hom more like that you're an idiot therefore your arguments are stupid.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    326. Re:Take back Slashdot by Grieviant · · Score: 1

      I'm curious to know, how can one possibly like an interview where the subject dodges every inconvenient questions asked? It was calculated PR and victim narrative just as everything Wu does is, and if you want to get behind that as being "a good interview" then I have no reservations in calling bullshit on it. The likes of amimojo and yourself seem desperate to normalize such content on slashdot, whereas the majority of the audience sees it for the progressive wank-fest that it is.

      The remainder of your post merely serves to indicate how hypocritical an deluded you've become. Accuse other people of ad-homs when you yourself have only slung insults from the start and never explained your position. Ahh right, I forget the sort of mental gymnastics that are possible when you've decided ahead of time that you're on the good side fighting the good fight. No need for objective appraisal of people / events, just keep pounding away with labels and ideology.

      As charming is the faux concern is ("IT WILL LEAD YOU THE DARK SIDE" lololol), if you're really out to change people's minds then you'd be well advised to explain yourself instead of acting like some crazed Baptist preacher at the pulpit.

    327. Re:Take back Slashdot by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Well, the first thing you can do is PUT THE DAILY EMAILER BACK HOW IT WAS!!

      I don't know what you did to it, but today's was somewhere between useless and unusable. Mostly it showed as a blank message with a couple of irrelevant links way down the page and badly formatted. I'll bet it got blocked as spam by more-proactive servers, just for the horrible layout (even if anything had worked right).

      I'm sure I'm not alone in that I haven't visited the front page in years, and rely entirely on the daily email for a list of topics in an easily-skimmed format.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    328. Re:Take back Slashdot by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      I'm curious to know, how can one possibly like an interview where the subject dodges every inconvenient questions asked? It was calculated PR and victim narrative just as everything Wu does is, and if you want to get behind that as being "a good interview" then I have no reservations in calling bullshit on it.

      Try asking AmiMojo, he's the one who claimed it was interesting. That said, what you're blithering is right out of the MRA handbook of nutjobbery. A key word is "narrative" which your sort seems royally obsessed with for some reason.

      Nonetheless "interesting" is a purely subjective decision. I see after your last absurd rant you've quietly dropped any references to presenting opinion as fact (after I took you to task) as if it never happened, yet you come back as if, well as if it never happened and as if I magically forgot.

      A clue: I didn't forget.

      when you've decided ahead of time that you're on the good side fighting the good fight

      It's called ethics. Real ethics, as opposed to that fakery called "ethics in videogame journalism" is not actually about spewing hate towards women on the internet. It's about, well, being actually ethical.

      if you're really out to change people's minds

      Awwww, how cute! :) You think I'm trying to reform you! I think you have deeply misunderstood who I am and what I'm like!

      You see, basically I think you're an irredeemable idiot (not a politically correct opinion, but I don't really care about such things). No, I'm posting replies to your inanities just in case anyone thinks any of your raving lunacy has any validity, and besides, I like annoying you.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    329. Re:Take back Slashdot by shanen · · Score: 1

      Hmm... I'm going to have to look into this "breakdown of the overall rating" thing... Is it a new aspect of the user's account information? My fuzzy recollection is that my research into how karma worked was pretty much disappointed and disappointing.

      Let me clarify that the way my suggested funding model would work, the powers-that-be-making-slashdot wouldn't do or change anything unless they already had a good estimate of how much it would cost and the funds had been offered by sufficient donors to make it work. No risk, since they would be holding the money anyway pending the donors' active encouragement about how to spend it.

      However, this particular feature does offer a pretty good example of an ongoing-cost project of a feasible size. The extended karma would incur some extra server costs, but not too large. The way the feature should be implemented, if the extra server runs out of funding, then the feature would become disabled. Attempting to use the feature would instead trigger a pitch to help fund the server for the next year. There is also a special marketing pitch in this case. You could allow the pledge to enable a single or limited use of the feature, pending full enablement when the ongoing costs are funded.

      --
      Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
    330. Re:Take back Slashdot by shanen · · Score: 1

      I am not new around here, but I AM picking on sourceforge as one of the biggest graveyards.

      My actual point is that it is mostly the economic model that is failing. There is a critical gap between the large number of people who might benefit from the completion of a project and the people who are sufficiently motivated to work on it. My suggested financial model is a way to bridge that gap...

      --
      Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
    331. Re:Take back Slashdot by mvdwege · · Score: 1

      I believe you miss the distinction between 'example' and 'one issue'. Then again, you right-wing kooks tend not to be too smart anyway, so you might just be that dumb.

      --
      "I know I will be modded down for this": where's the option '-1, Asking for it'?
    332. Re: Take back Slashdot by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      Like you've never accidentally kept writing the previous year on stuff in January.

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    333. Re:Take back Slashdot by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      How about a completely redone-HTML5 skeleton and have a design competition for who can theme it the best. CSS has come pretty far since 2001.
      Where you around when they tried to show off beta? OMG Things are different... DIFFERENT!!!!!! Every change on Slashdot appearance is met with harsh retribution.

      If you're going to change something, it absolutely has to be better. Not 'different.' I spoke with a developer in one of those Slashdot Beta discussions and he admitted that the motivation was that Slashdot HAD to be different. That if a website doesn't change radically, it becomes "stale." It's a mindset I can't stand, because it prioritizes "different" over "useful." Useful should always come first. "If it ain't broken, don't fix it" is a foreign and outdated concept to these folks. We have tons of experience with websites that crash and burn after a failed interface experiment goes live, and Slashdot Beta had solidly gone down that road.

    334. Re:Take back Slashdot by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      I want the word "boxen" banned.

    335. Re:Take back Slashdot by whipslash · · Score: 1

      Yes we are fixing that today.

    336. Re:Take back Slashdot by khallow · · Score: 1

      I also based my assertion on your posting history and the fact you never bothered to come up with a second example in the first place.

    337. Re:Take back Slashdot by budgenator · · Score: 1

      but the majority of the AC is firmly in Groupthink mode anyway. If karma really got kicked in the dirt for bucking the groupthink then mine would be lower than whale shit; not have your moderations overturned in meta seems to count way more than comment moderations in karma.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    338. Re:Take back Slashdot by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Thank you!

      Remember... if it ain't broke, don't fix it! :)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    339. Re:Take back Slashdot by unitron · · Score: 1

      Firehose isn't all that new, it showed up back when Taco was still here.
      Just off the top of my head I'd say it's been about a decade.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    340. Re:Take back Slashdot by Reziac · · Score: 2

      Fixed! Thanks.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    341. Re:Take back Slashdot by stdarg · · Score: 1

      I wonder if your perspective on "unfair" moderation is related to your word choice? Maybe you think you're being fair here, but calling disagreement with feminist perspectives "a He-Man Woman Haters Club" is stupid. Adding "even if not of the flaming nutjob variety" to "conservatives" makes you sound like a troll.

      How do you think your post should be moderated? Insightful? Interesting? It's not either of those. It probably should be Troll because it's designed to upset people and make them post a defensive reply ("I'm not a woman hater! You're a man hater!").

      I've got mod points but I almost never mod posts down, so I thought I'd just ask you... what do you think should happen to your posts when you talk like that?

    342. Re:Take back Slashdot by drakaan · · Score: 1

      I'd love some empirical evidence of how pervasive that modding behavior is. I'm not worried about my karma tanking for making a post that people disagree with. If I get disagreement, then that starts a discussion, and we can hopefully come to an understanding of each others' position, if not agreement on what's "right". Modding on posts that are a part of that discussion is secondary to the discussion itself. That said, a moderation of "-1 Incorrect" would be an obvious complement to "+1 Insightful", and lead to an improved ability to metamod for abuses.

      --
      "Murphy was an optimist" - O'Toole's commentary on Murphy's Law
    343. Re:Take back Slashdot by mvdwege · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't bring up posting history if I were you. People might start to wonder if it isn't cold in that glass house with all those broken windows.

      --
      "I know I will be modded down for this": where's the option '-1, Asking for it'?
    344. Re:Take back Slashdot by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      Maybe you think you're being fair here, but calling disagreement with feminist perspectives "a He-Man Woman Haters Club" is stupid.

      What happens here isn't disagreement, it's bias, misogyny, cluelessness, and ignorance on an epic scale. That you can't recognize the difference is telling.
       

      Adding "even if not of the flaming nutjob variety" to "conservatives" makes you sound like a troll.

      No, it makes me sound like someone who grasps that there is a difference.
       

      It probably should be Troll because it's designed to upset people and make them post a defensive reply ("I'm not a woman hater! You're a man hater!").

      No, it's designed to tell the truth. Not to mention I can't "make" people do anything - it's their own free choice.
       

      I wonder if your perspective on "unfair" moderation is related to your word choice?

      Get back to me when you have a clue and a working grasp of the English language. Seriously, you're exactly the kind of moderator and moderation I'm talking about, because you have neither and thus don't grasp what a quagmire /. has become of late.

    345. Re:Take back Slashdot by khallow · · Score: 1

      Bring it. It's a waste of your time, but I'm willing to show you why once you've gone through the effort.

    346. Re:Take back Slashdot by adolf · · Score: 1

      I, for one, anxiously await the arrival of our Turing-complete, troff-grokking overlords.

    347. Re:Take back Slashdot by stdarg · · Score: 1

      Yeahhhhh... you sound like quite an idiot.

      Seriously, you're exactly the kind of moderator and moderation I'm talking about

      lol yeah might want to bone up on that "working grasp of the English language" hehe

      But what do I know, I'm a kind of moderation. Dummy hehe.

    348. Re:Take back Slashdot by Malc · · Score: 1

      I don't get: I am using a keyboard.

      But let me try with these keyboard maps:
      * ABC Extended: Option+3 = £
      * UK keyboard: Shift+3 = £
      * Unicode Hex Input: Option+0,0,A,3 = £

      If this doesn't work then please tell me what the magic is...

    349. Re:Take back Slashdot by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Try US International Keyboard layout. What OS are you using? With Linux, I just make sure that fcitx (don't blame me, I didn't name it) is running and that the settings are to set the International Keyboard as the default layout.

      It is: "Keyboard - English (US) English (international AltGr dead keys)"

      I don't *think* beta or even using the old post method impacts it. Try setting the same keyboard as that one (or the closest to it that your OS has) as the default for a minute and see if that does the trick? On Windows you just switch to the English - US International layout and set that as the default. Then, with that, I think it's a bit different to input it, namely using quotes without a space inserts accents and changes the characters. It's a bit quirky as I recall, you have to remember to press space after hitting a quote mark (single or double) or the next typed character will probably not be what you were aiming for.

      Your post says "Option" which makes me think you're probably using Apple? That's sort of BSD-based, yes? I'm not overly familiar with the OS but I'm not an OS zealot of any type. I'm just not familiar with it. There's bound to be a US International keyboard layout. Try that, even if just to rule it out, and I am nearly certain that the "Option" key will not work regardless - I think it has to be "AltGr" or "dead key" input.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    350. Re:Take back Slashdot by Malc · · Score: 1

      I am using the US International keyboard, which is renamed to "ABC Extended" in the latest version of OS X. Why would the keyboard mapping matter? Doesn't it create the same character code? If plugging in and using a standard UK keyboard doesn't work when entering a GBP £ symbol (which I've tried) then I don't suppose switching keyboard mapping will work - they'll all generate the same character code won't they?

    351. Re:Take back Slashdot by Malc · · Score: 1

      I ran Wireshark and during the last comment, and the following is what I see (some content replaced by asterisks). Perhaps your browser is encoding things differently? Perhaps you're using a different formatting (I'm posting as "Plain Old Text")?


      POST /comments.pl HTTP/1.1
      Host: slashdot.org
      Accept: text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,*/*;q=0.8
      Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate
      Accept-Language: en-gb
      Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded
      Origin: http://slashdot.org/
      Content-Length: 649
      Connection: keep-alive
      User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_11_3) AppleWebKit/601.4.4 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/9.0.3 Safari/601.4.4
      Referer: http://slashdot.org/comments.p... filter crap)*
      DNT: 1
      Cookie: __utma=*(lameness filter crap)*

      *(lameness filter crap)*&postersubj=Re%3ATake+back+Slashdot&postercomment=I+am+using+the+US+International+keyboard%2C+which+is+renamed+to+%22ABC+Extended%22+in+the+latest+version+of+OS+X.++Why+would+the+keyboard+mapping+matter%3F++Doesn%27t+it+create+the+same+character+code%3F++If+plugging+in+and+using+a+standard+UK+keyboard+doesn%27t+work+when+entering+a+GBP+%C2%A3+symbol+%28which+I%27ve+tried%29+then+I+don%27t+suppose+switching+keyboard+mapping+will+work+-+they%27ll+all+generate+the+same+character+code+won%27t+they%3F&nobonus_present=1&postanon_present=1&posttype=1&op=Submit

      HTTP/1.1 200 OK

      Server: Apache/2.2.3 (CentOS)
      X-XRDS-Location: http://slashdot.org/slashdot.x...
      Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
      Content-Length: 16122
      Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 07:12:26 GMT
      X-Varnish: 647140691
      Age: 1
      Connection: Keep-Alive
      Vary: Accept-Encoding, User-Agent
      Content-Encoding: gzip

      [...]

      The URLEncoded part decodes to the following, which clearly shows the GBP £ Symbol.


      postersubj=Re:Take back Slashdot&postercomment=I am using the US International keyboard, which is renamed to "ABC Extended" in the latest version of OS X. Why would the keyboard mapping matter? Doesn't it create the same character code? If plugging in and using a standard UK keyboard doesn't work when entering a GBP £ symbol (which I've tried) then I don't suppose switching keyboard mapping will work - they'll all generate the same character code won't they?&nobonus_present=1&postanon_present=1&posttype=1&op=Submit

    352. Re:Take back Slashdot by KGIII · · Score: 1

      It seems that the keyboard mapping matters on entry. Why? I have no idea. However, this is the second time I've typed this out... Something odd happened. It involved a frozen computer which ate my first attempt.

      First, I typed out the © in Opera (my main browser), Firefox, Vivaldi, Chromium, and Midori. I pressed review and they all showed. Then, just to test something, I was back in Opera and typed out the © with the keyboard and it worked but... Now I get confused, this has not (until just now) worked. I typed the ¼ with Unicode (which is Left Alt + Shift + Left Ctrl + 12345 or whatever - usually abbreviated as U+12345) and then I typed it with the keyboard layout like so: ¼ And they both show up in preview.

      Now, until today that did not happen. In fact, until just a little while ago that did not happen - so far as I know. Prior to today, that ¼ symbol would only appear (or the © or any of them) if I used the US International blah blah AltGr whatever keyboard. I don't know any other languages well enough to try their keyboard layouts - so I can only claim that it worked for that one. It does so in Linux, BSD, and Windows. I do not know about OS X. I do not know what has now changed but now the U+12345 method appears to be working - at least it does here, on this keyboard, with this OS. ;-)

      So, up until just a little while ago - it was the input method that mattered. And yes, you'd think it would be the same but I can verify that it did not work - with multiple attempts with the same exact characters, in the past.

      That said, err... They appear to have changed something? Another quick test seems to indicate that I can use either the U+12345 method or the keyboard layout method. Also, I am using the "plain old text" input as are you. I do have to wonder... Hmm...

      Now that you mention it - and I've not given this any thought until just now as I type this... The output character should be the same - regardless of our input method, correct? The only thing that I can think of... Hmm... Are you blocking any scripts? I block the tracking scripts. I let the others through. Could that be it, maybe?

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  3. BIZX is destroying Slashdot!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Man, things sure were a lot better back when Dice owned this place.

    1. Re:BIZX is destroying Slashdot!!! by whipslash · · Score: 1

      I appreciated this.

    2. Re:BIZX is destroying Slashdot!!! by Darinbob · · Score: 5, Funny

      Feels like it was only yesterday. Such is nostalgia.

    3. Re:BIZX is destroying Slashdot!!! by lgw · · Score: 1

      I for one welcome our new BIZX overlords! Wait, WTF is a BIZX anyhow?

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    4. Re:BIZX is destroying Slashdot!!! by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

      You are saying all the right things, I left over dice ownership. I couldn't take it anymore. Well, I'll keep my eye on slash and contribute in comments as things come up. I have no idea on how you expect slashdot to make much dinero, but good luck to you. It seems like you have the best of intentions.

      --
      Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
    5. Re:BIZX is destroying Slashdot!!! by penguinoid · · Score: 5, Funny

      Back in my day, people would wait more than a day before pining for the old days. They sure don't make nostalgia like they used to.

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    6. Re:BIZX is destroying Slashdot!!! by whipslash · · Score: 1

      Thanks. There will be some hiccups I'm sure, but we're going to do our best.

    7. Re:BIZX is destroying Slashdot!!! by grcumb · · Score: 4, Funny

      I for one welcome our new BIZX overlords! Wait, WTF is a BIZX anyhow?

      It's what you IZX after I make you eat my SHIZX, BIZX.

      Fo-SHIZX my DIZX, BIZX.

      --
      Crumb's Corollary: Never bring a knife to a bun fight.
    8. Re:BIZX is destroying Slashdot!!! by Chmarr · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Bizx LLC is an advertising and marketing company. So... I don't really hold out much hope of improvement.

    9. Re:BIZX is destroying Slashdot!!! by Rei · · Score: 1

      What other sort of company would we expect to run a site whose business model is based around advertising?

      --
      What the hells goin on in the engine room? Were there monkeys? Some terrifying space monkeys maybe got loose?
    10. Re:BIZX is destroying Slashdot!!! by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      I dunno, this could be the great experiment that saves internet advertising. If they can succeed on Slashdot, they can succeed anywhere.

      How about this. Instead of banner ads and sponsored stories that get blocked by many people anyway, let's have some real contact with the people offering these services. Not just the usual Slashdot video interviews that are basically ads, I mean get them to write a short intro for their product and why it's worth using (with a lameness filter for buzzwords) and then answer questions in the usual way. If their product is actually any good it could work out really well for them.

      Of course, most people who buy banner ads and paid stories are trying to sell you shit, so for them it would suck...

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    11. Re:BIZX is destroying Slashdot!!! by Rei · · Score: 1

      Just one thing...and I think the Oatmeal put it well:

      How I feel after reading 1000 insightful, positive comments about my work: "The whole internet loves me."
      How I feel after reading 1000 insightful, positive comments about my work and one negative one: "The whole internet hates me :("

      If many users are saying the same complaint about the site, please listen to it. But if there's just one or a couple people... try not to take it personally. That's going to happen. Stay informed of what people want, but know that there will of course be the random angry mean person out there, and don't let it get you down. :)

      --
      What the hells goin on in the engine room? Were there monkeys? Some terrifying space monkeys maybe got loose?
    12. Re:BIZX is destroying Slashdot!!! by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Sounds like some Stock Exchange ticker thingamajig.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    13. Re:BIZX is destroying Slashdot!!! by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      This is the internet my friend. Where you're sold in the morning, mourn the loss of your freedom at noon and in the evening you remember fondly how great it used to be in the old days. You know, before you got up on that day.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    14. Re:BIZX is destroying Slashdot!!! by zlives · · Score: 1

      i still can hope that advertising and marketing can be done in conjunction with news... lets hope bizx knows this... don;t really know much about them and their rep.

    15. Re:BIZX is destroying Slashdot!!! by lgw · · Score: 1

      I agree with my nemesis on this - perhaps the only thing we agree on!

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    16. Re:BIZX is destroying Slashdot!!! by whipslash · · Score: 1

      This is a good idea.

  4. Must be desperate to buy noted malware host SF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'm sure they'll find a way to make it worse.

    1. Re:Must be desperate to buy noted malware host SF by whipslash · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Our first order of business is to get rid of any malware and deceptive advertisements. Check out the plans here: http://fossforce.com/2016/01/s...

    2. Re:Must be desperate to buy noted malware host SF by whipslash · · Score: 1

      Yes. It was meant for the idle sub domain. New guy here.

    3. Re:Must be desperate to buy noted malware host SF by Sarten-X · · Score: 3, Interesting

      How about getting rid of non-functioning "Disable Advertising" buttons?

      --
      You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
    4. Re:Must be desperate to buy noted malware host SF by whipslash · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yeah we noticed those. We'll get them fixed.

    5. Re:Must be desperate to buy noted malware host SF by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      Can I have a ham on rye, hold the mayo?

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    6. Re:Must be desperate to buy noted malware host SF by gl4ss · · Score: 2

      while you're at it make them work for mobile and more importantly: get rid of the ads provider that is trying to install apk's when visited from asia. it's those half screen ads on the mobile site, every now often there's some advert or another that jumps the page to some page that links to an apk trying to get an install.

      this kind of ads got served at least to thailand not too long ago.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    7. Re:Must be desperate to buy noted malware host SF by whipslash · · Score: 2

      Comin' right up.

    8. Re:Must be desperate to buy noted malware host SF by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      How about getting rid of non-functioning "Disable Advertising" buttons?

      Weird. They work for me. Or do you mean that they don't hide the Dice.com posts? :-D

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    9. Re:Must be desperate to buy noted malware host SF by phantomfive · · Score: 2

      Our first order of business is to get rid of any malware and deceptive advertisements.

      I will respond happily to that by not blocking ads on Slashdot.
      Might I also suggest fixing the subscription system?

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    10. Re:Must be desperate to buy noted malware host SF by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      I have to say, the button works for me, but every other visit to the mobile site unchecks the option. I re-check it and all is good, but yes, it is still annoying. That said, if the current crop of ads are replaced with static images or text ads I'd be willing to uncheck the box and leave it that way. I probably won't click them, though, so make sure you're getting CPM and not CPC for those.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    11. Re:Must be desperate to buy noted malware host SF by tshawkins · · Score: 1

      +1 on this, im in the philippines and i keep getting drive by download attempts when browsing slashdot on my phone or tablet.

    12. Re:Must be desperate to buy noted malware host SF by Rei · · Score: 1

      The ring came off my pudding can!

      --
      What the hells goin on in the engine room? Were there monkeys? Some terrifying space monkeys maybe got loose?
    13. Re:Must be desperate to buy noted malware host SF by LordHighExecutioner · · Score: 1

      Here, fixed for you.

    14. Re:Must be desperate to buy noted malware host SF by CRC'99 · · Score: 1

      Our first order of business is to get rid of any malware and deceptive advertisements. Check out the plans here: http://fossforce.com/2016/01/s...

      What? You expect us to read the linked article? Are you new here? :)

      --
      Sendmail is like emacs: A nice operating system, but missing an editor and a MTA.
    15. Re:Must be desperate to buy noted malware host SF by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 1

      Also, the trend for video articles... I guess it's the 21st century, some trends can't be stopped, but remind those involved that most of us read slashdot, and the articles. Reading is silent (if done properly), and suitable for the workplace where a bunch of us tend to do our slashdotting. Also, let's be honest, most nerds aren't that photogenic, if I wanted to look at grumpy-looking ugly men I can find a mirror or alight from my swivel chair and walk through cube land.

    16. Re:Must be desperate to buy noted malware host SF by Sarten-X · · Score: 1

      Some ads don't hide, and I find it quite interesting how often I have to re-check the box.

      --
      You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
    17. Re:Must be desperate to buy noted malware host SF by jlv · · Score: 1

      Someone mod this up.

    18. Re:Must be desperate to buy noted malware host SF by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      In your purge of annoying advertisement gimmicks, please make the "disable advertising" checkbox for good-standing members ACTUALLY DISABLE THE ADVERTISING. Also, if you could fix the ads that load just as I'm clicking on one of the messages in the right-hand bar of the main page, which displaces the messages box in favor of an ad I didn't want to click on, that'd be great.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    19. Re:Must be desperate to buy noted malware host SF by whipslash · · Score: 1

      Good calls

    20. Re:Must be desperate to buy noted malware host SF by Kobun · · Score: 1

      That asshole (botg) understands it just fine. He's just doing what every sellout has ever done - spin and misdirection. This thread shows it quite clearly - https://forum.filezilla-projec...

  5. Serious question by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The announcement implies there are 30 (thirty) people working at SlashDot. Given the poorly edited article summaries and near-daily front page dups, what do these thirty people actually DO?

    1. Re:Serious question by jandrese · · Score: 5, Funny

      Presumably they're working hard on not supporting Unicode.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    2. Re:Serious question by MightyYar · · Score: 5, Funny

      Cold-calling people for ads?

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    3. Re:Serious question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Browsing Reddit for stories.

    4. Re:Serious question by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure they have spent most of the past couple years looking for new work in the understanding that this site is going to go dark for good soon.

      --
      Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    5. Re:Serious question by smittyoneeach · · Score: 1

      My account name used to be smitty_one_each. They really made the whole OpenID implementation fun. For "can't log in for two weeks" values of "fun".

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    6. Re:Serious question by whipslash · · Score: 2

      SlashDot and SourceForge were both part of the transaction. SourceForge has a much larger staff.

    7. Re:Serious question by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      I hate working at places that insist on group calisthenics.

    8. Re:Serious question by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yes, a soupçon of Unicode support would be a boon to those of us who wish to drop in the occasional pretentious foreign phrase, name-drop our visit to Düsseldorf or Tromsø, or bring up El Niño for the umpteenth time.

    9. Re:Serious question by Garybaldy · · Score: 2

      WOW. You have got the lowest number i have seen so far. Most impressive.

    10. Re:Serious question by Noah+Haders · · Score: 1

      i don't get it. I see all your fancy characters. how would unicode help with that?

    11. Re:Serious question by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      They look at what's voted in on this page: http://slashdot.org/recent

      And if it's really badly edited they may tweak it.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    12. Re:Serious question by dgatwood · · Score: 4, Informative

      Because right now, you have to write ñ as &ntilde; instead of just hitting option-n followed by n.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    13. Re:Serious question by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      Also, you're currently limited to non-ASCII characters that have HTML names; if you need something like &#x1f4a9; (Unicode pile of poo), you're hosed, because Slashdot strips unnamed character entities. (BTW, that last bit is probably a one-line fix, and would be most appreciated.)

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    14. Re:Serious question by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

      Also, you're currently limited to non-ASCII characters that have HTML names; if you need something like &#x1f4a9; (Unicode pile of poo),

      I stepped in enough piles of dogshit when I was a kid, I don't need to see representations of shit in the text of comments on Slashdot.

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    15. Re:Serious question by Kobun · · Score: 2

      SourceForge has a much larger staff.

      If ever there was a situation to aggressively reduce headcount, this seems like it.

    16. Re: Serious question by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      Are you implying that 2/3 of the /. editorial staff didn't deserve to be let go? I'm pretty sure not actually doing your job is a legitimate reason to can someone.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    17. Re:Serious question by Mal-2 · · Score: 1

      Or in my case, ~n followed by the Compose Character key. Now if I could somehow teach AutoHotkey to distinguish what website I'm on, it could replace that combination with &ntilde; on this site alone, but that still doesn't get me superscripts, subscripts, letters with two accents, etc. Also, why should I have to write a custom script for a single website?

      --
      How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
    18. Re:Serious question by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 2

      I don't need to see representations of shit in the text of comments on Slashdot.

      You really are new around here.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    19. Re:Serious question by Rei · · Score: 1

      Just as a random anecdote, a couple months ago I was shopping around for repositories for a project and went with Github as it's so commonly used now and Sourceforge had the whole bundleware issue. But honestly I'm not a big fan of git, and would rather have gone with something else. So hopefully you can restore Sourceforge's reputation and turn it into a real alternative. :)

      --
      What the hells goin on in the engine room? Were there monkeys? Some terrifying space monkeys maybe got loose?
    20. Re:Serious question by Frederic54 · · Score: 1

      Hi fellow lowID, my username was "Frédéric" for 10 years, then something fucked up on the site and I was not able to log anymore, I had to contact admin and they had to change my username because of accentuated characters, /. is still limited to 7bits ASCII, this is incredible..

      --
      "Science will win because it works." - Stephen Hawking
    21. Re:Serious question by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      i don't get it. I see all your fancy characters. how would unicode help with that?

      Because those characters you see are the lucky ones. Many other characters used in European languages, like Norse thorn, are not reproducible. What if you need to stick in a kanji or a Cyrillic word?

    22. Re:Serious question by ravrazor · · Score: 1

      mine was -razor- and same thing happened to me.

    23. Re:Serious question by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      He's still got a damned fine point though, which is that you do have to make a decision as to where to stop.

      To me, the place to draw the line is emoji like poop, hot dogs, and stick men doing the macarena while covered in hot grits. The symbols we need are reverse quote marks, circle-copyright and whatnot, and currency symbols. And hey, how about the basic symbols of mathematics and electronics? I don't mean a picture of a resistor, but being able to paste an omega would be spiffy.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    24. Re:Serious question by chihowa · · Score: 1

      Please, please, please do not support Emoji on Slashdot.

      This site will clear out so fast if you do that.

      --
      If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
    25. Re:Serious question by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      It's a good thing they were owned by Dice then!

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    26. Re:Serious question by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      Unicode and emoji, Unicode and emoji
      go together like an "o" and "mg".
      This I tell you, brother:
      you can't have one without the other....

      But seriously, I was being kind of facetious with that example. My point was that there are a lot of valid Unicode characters that I've wanted to use over the years, but couldn't, and that the only reason I couldn't was that the parser doesn't allow arbitrary Unicode code points to be specified as numbered character entities.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    27. Re:Serious question by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      Must admit the user ID change for you is annoying me much more than it should - the underscores affected the shape of your ID, which made it easier to scan read...

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    28. Re:Serious question by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      Forget keyboard shortcuts, cut and paste would benefit hugely from being able to use the actual characters...

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    29. Re:Serious question by jandrese · · Score: 1

      Slashdot supported Unicode for some time in the old days. Then someone figured out that they could leave a dangling RTL marker in a comment and reverse the rest of the comment section. Rather than trying to sanitize the Unicode the Slashdot team took the nuclear option and just stripped everything down to 7 bit ASCII. Now there is nobody left who feels qualified to touch the code anymore and the problem has festered for over a decade.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    30. Re:Serious question by smittyoneeach · · Score: 1

      I guess the nick situation is in keeping with the two-generation-old-codebase feel of this site.

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    31. Re:Serious question by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      Some us even live in those places and eat smörgåsbord from time to time.

      As for me, I just want to be able to use Hanzi in my sig.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    32. Re:Serious question by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      ...what do these thirty people actually DO?

      Isn't it obvious?

      One for the nouns, one for the verbs, one for the adjectives,...

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    33. Re:Serious question by Noah+Haders · · Score: 1

      What if you need to stick in a kanji or a Cyrillic word?

      I don't think it's anything to worry about. If you just use the regular English letters then people will know what you mean.

    34. Re:Serious question by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      No they won't, because the mapping between "English letters" and many other languages is not in general one-to-one. In Japanese, the pair of kanji Romanized as senko, for example, has 22 distinct kanji readings. That's 22 different pairs of kanji, representing totally distinct words, that are pronounced the same way. Because the spoken language is so simple in comparison to the semantic complexity of the characters imported from China, when Japanese are having an intellectual conversation it is common to see the dialog stop so one party can trace a character on the palm of his hand, clarifying the intended spelling.

    35. Re:Serious question by Kobun · · Score: 1

      I've said some of this elsewhere in this topic, but Sourceforge has a real problem on both ends of the equation.

      On the demand side - what knowledgeable IT worker would download anything ever again from SourceForge after they started the fake download buttons, not to mention the bundle-some-shit-ware (if they had continued to be owned by Dice). I have blocked my organization from using Sourceforge, many others have done so to, most antivirus and webfilters block their downloads now ... No one is downloading from SourceForge.

      On the supply side - what do they even have left? NAS4Free and 7-Zip (and FileZilla and PDFCreator, both of which can rot in hell). A non-exhaustive list of the things they have lost: Notepad++, VLC, GIMP, NMap and a whole host of related tools, and practically every project-of-the-month of note from 2012 and earlier: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      It boils down to a simple question. At this point, who would go there and what would they download?

    36. Re:Serious question by Mal-2 · · Score: 1

      Couldn't you use WinGetActiveTitle? the title for Slashdot webpages in chrome and firefox contain "Slashdot" in them.

      Probably, but I've never gotten it to work properly. Besides, as I said, why should I have to write a whole separate script just for one website?

      --
      How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
    37. Re:Serious question by Noah+Haders · · Score: 1

      Just use romanji (or pinyin in Chinese). This is an English board...

    38. Re:Serious question by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      The problem isn't typing them, the problem is pasting them. What year is it? Copy and paste should work

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  6. Better financial models? by shanen · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Well, my main reaction is "What? Again?" Been following slashdot off and on for some years, and mostly impressed by the LOST potential. Could do so much better, but obviously the financial models don't work that way.

    Say.... What if you could buy a $10 charity share to implement a new feature or support a server for the next year? If enough people chip in, then the feature gets funded or the server keeps running. If not, maybe you'll see something else you want to support--or they can rewrite the project until it is persuasive enough to get the donors. I think most people are basically nice folks, and if you make it easier to do nice things, then they will do so.

    Point to the opposite extreme. Microsoft has terrible service, but their financial model works great. Ditto a number of other highly offensive but profitable companies, usually distinguished by their mediocre software and services. Slashdot (and open source) could do better?

    --
    Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
    1. Re:Better financial models? by SunTzuWarmaster · · Score: 1

      If you are interested, you can come over to Soylent News, where they/we are following that model exactly. I see SN as the "old slashdot", where people still crunch the numbers.

    2. Re:Better financial models? by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

      I would absolutely support a 'pay to develop' model.

    3. Re:Better financial models? by shanen · · Score: 1

      There in another tab, already bookmarked, and I'll seriously study it soon. If it really is what I'm looking for, then I thank you greatly for calling it to my attention, and the project I want to fund now is one that will help more people find it...

      Let's go seriously viral about making the world better.

      --
      Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
    4. Re:Better financial models? by shanen · · Score: 1

      A convert! Hallelujah! We're saved!

      Seriously, glad to hear you like the idea. So how to make it happen?

      Actually, there have been a small number of people who have liked various aspects of the idea, but I am NOT a leader type. I basically don't like people trying to tell me what to do and I don't like telling other people what they should do. Perhaps "I have no dog in your fight" could be my motto?

      (Incidentally, I was trying to translate that expression into Japanese this morning... There must be a for it?)

      --
      Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
  7. Open to Questions by whipslash · · Score: 5, Informative

    Logan Abbott from BIZX here. Happy to answer any questions.

    1. Re:Open to Questions by v1 · · Score: 1

      "why this again?"

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    2. Re:Open to Questions by 110010001000 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Here is a question: are you planning on posting more Ghostkillah stories that link to TMZ? Because that is totally the Slashdot audience.

    3. Re:Open to Questions by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the opportunity to ask a question.
      Was their ever any more news on this slashdot related topic:
      "GCHQ Created Spoofed LinkedIn and Slashdot Sites To Serve Malware"
      http://news.slashdot.org/story...

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    4. Re:Open to Questions by Torodung · · Score: 1

      You must be new here. (Sorry, couldn't resist)

    5. Re:Open to Questions by whipslash · · Score: 4, Informative

      No

    6. Re:Open to Questions by whipslash · · Score: 1

      This is true.

    7. Re:Open to Questions by Nethemas+the+Great · · Score: 2

      How do you folks plan to monetize us this time? Dice seemed to pride themselves in making us feel like a jilted lover. Are we in for more of the same? Or can you offer us reason for new hope?

      --
      Two of my imaginary friends reproduced once ... with negative results.
    8. Re:Open to Questions by whipslash · · Score: 1

      We appreciate it. We're going to do our best. There might be some hiccups along the way but we're going to listen to you guys and make sure we get this right.

    9. Re:Open to Questions by 110010001000 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Darn.

    10. Re:Open to Questions by whipslash · · Score: 5, Informative

      The deal just closed less than 24 hours ago, so there are no immediate plans other than to try and gauge the community and make sure what we do is inline with the original Slashdot spirit. Our company is profitable, so we have no reason to resort to desperate deceptive or underhanded methods in order to make money. Our focus is making sure this community has the support it needs.

    11. Re:Open to Questions by whipslash · · Score: 1

      Our core business is web media publishing across many verticals, but focused mostly on technology. We can't disclose the terms of the deal due to a confidentiality agreement.

    12. Re:Open to Questions by shri · · Score: 5, Funny

      You paid money for Slashdot and could not work out a lower user id than 4433507 as a part of the sale?!??!

      I'd go for 666 if you were you. :)

    13. Re:Open to Questions by Chewy509 · · Score: 1

      What are your plans for sourceforge?

    14. Re:Open to Questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Logan, thanks for introducing yourself to me and answering my questions posted as AC in the SpaceX article. I've been around here since around 1999, so I've seen things change a lot over time. I have some suggestions to make, and I'd be interested to hear what you and the other editors have to say.

      * Bring back a focus on Linux and FOSS. While I enjoy other topics, too, this is a sister site to SourceForge and FOSS is in Slashdot's DNA. Slsahdot used to have lots of sections (Ask Slashdot, Apple, BSD, YRO, Science, etc...) and some of the stories now posted to the front page could go into those sections. There were stories whenever new versions of the Linux kernel, FreeBSD distributions, and some software packages. Those were good and placed a greater emphasis on FOSS. Renewing a focus on YRO would be great, too, because those rights are under attack now more than ever.

      * There used to be a good amount of original content on Slashdot, things like interviews, book reviews, articles written by Jon Katz. I understand that it may not be worth paying someone to write original content, but why not solicit it from users? I'd love to see more of an emphasis on Ask Slashdot and interviews.

      * There were also follow-ups on stories that had been posted recently, and they were grouped together into a single article. This was called Slashback. As I recall, that was posted weekly. I'd love to see that come back.

      * Please eliminate the restrictions that only allow users posting at -1 to post twice a day. Yes, they're trolls, but they'd also post in journals and converse with other users in their journals. I think there's more AC trolling because of those restrictions (I'm guilty of this), more mod points and effort wasted, and perhaps less interaction between logged-in users. While they're trolls, they were also responsible for much of the culture and humor of this site (e.g., ALL YOUR BASE, IN SOVIET RUSSIA, Natalie Portman and hot grits, can you imagine a Beowulf cluster of, etc...) and were entertaining. It's part of what made the site fun for a lot of people, and I think you'd bring more people here if you relaxed some of the restrictions.

      * I'd love to see the current code powering Slashdot to be released as FOSS. One of the great things about Slashdot was Slashcode. It also brought in some community involvement as people could suggest and implement improvements to the site. While this was probably quite a small percentage of users, some contributed and others ran Slash on their own sites. It was also a great gesture that a site about FOSS also released its own code as FOSS.

      * Editors were generally unwilling to link to paywalled sites or sites that did sketchy things. The NY Times was the one exception to this. I'd like to see less things on sketchy sites and those with obnoxious ads (Forbes). If people like Ethan want people to read their content, I'd rather they submit the content as stories on Slashdot rather than linking to Forbes, which has served malware ads while demanding people turn off their ad blockers.

    15. Re:Open to Questions by Bite+The+Pillow · · Score: 5, Funny

      Where the hell did Beta go? Everyone here seemed on board and then whoosh, nothing. Like a giant vacuum where no one can hear you compliment the web 3.0 interface. It's a wasted opportunity.

    16. Re:Open to Questions by whipslash · · Score: 1

      That's a good question. We think we have the resources and team to "make Slashdot great again."

    17. Re:Open to Questions by zenlessyank · · Score: 1

      http://www.bizx.com/ Is(are) this you guys too? *they both sound wrong ;)

    18. Re:Open to Questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Look back for the last 10 years, see which articles had the most replies.

      I believe most people come here for the lively comments, but like to leave with the feeling that they have gained insight into something interesting.

      We crave detailed comments by experts(aka 10000 hours with the subject) and the funny ones that are not so expert.

      We do not like clickbait, we know you need to keep the lights on, but we do not like to see java script all over and our favorite browser (today), tail spinning while viewing articles.

      Think google, more is less when it comes to interfaces. Which is why the extreme hate for the beta site.

      Good luck, remember perl is your friend, not your enemy, even if the grey bearded autistic introverts think your question is dumb. :)

    19. Re:Open to Questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Systemd, for or against?

    20. Re:Open to Questions by istartedi · · Score: 1

      OK, we've heard from the potted plant. I wonder what the sperm whale is thinking.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    21. Re:Open to Questions by lgw · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Where the hell did Beta go? Everyone here seemed on board and then whoosh, nothing. Like a giant vacuum where no one can hear you compliment the web 3.0 interface. It's a wasted opportunity.

      That ... that goes beyond the pale, even for Slashdot trolling. You might as well be reading out load from the Necronomicon.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    22. Re:Open to Questions by Krishnoid · · Score: 2

      How did your parents pick the name 'Logan'?

      Well, you did say *any* questions.

    23. Re:Open to Questions by whipslash · · Score: 1

      We are not related to bizx.com. It's pronounced like "physics" but with a "b" ;) ... Not that anyone was wondering.

    24. Re:Open to Questions by whipslash · · Score: 4, Funny

      I wish I would have met you before we signed the contract. ;)

    25. Re:Open to Questions by whipslash · · Score: 5, Informative

      Get rid of the deceptive ad practices and unwanted bundled offers. Improve the feature set. More here: http://fossforce.com/2016/01/s...

    26. Re:Open to Questions by whipslash · · Score: 1

      These are great ideas and I've saved them. Do you want to get in touch with me outside of the SD comment section? Would definitely be willing to speak more if you wanted to.

    27. Re:Open to Questions by whipslash · · Score: 2

      My pop's favorite movie was "Logan's Run" - http://www.imdb.com/title/tt00...

    28. Re:Open to Questions by gerf · · Score: 1

      to try and gauge

      "try to gauge". The editing farce continues...

    29. Re:Open to Questions by troutman · · Score: 4

      I like that plan. I wish you well. Remember always that you are now a steward of a couple of big pieces of internet history and lore.

    30. Re: Open to Questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Long-time lurker here.. Not so excited about Linux and FOSS, but totally agree with the comment restrictions. I come here for the debate, the diversity of ideas, and yes... The trolls, because they're mostly funny and not pointless.

      If we wanted safe spaces and social justice, we'd go to Reddit. You don't need to be Reddit. Be Slashdot.

    31. Re:Open to Questions by whipslash · · Score: 2

      It's been less than 24 hours since the deal closed. We're looking at all our options but priority #1 is listening to feedback, hence this story.

    32. Re: Open to Questions by whipslash · · Score: 1

      Noted x100

    33. Re:Open to Questions by whipslash · · Score: 1

      Thanks. We're going to do our best and we appreciate the feedback.

    34. Re:Open to Questions by whipslash · · Score: 1

      Not that I am aware of. I'll check it out though.

    35. Re:Open to Questions by whipslash · · Score: 1

      Thanks! We are well aware.

    36. Re:Open to Questions by zenlessyank · · Score: 1

      OK. Thanks. Good luck getting this place back to an informative, open, and friendly forum. And please find out who the ****** is who thought putting malware in Sourceforge downloads was a good idea and push him off a tall cliff over jagged rocks.

    37. Re:Open to Questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Man your 30th birthday is going to SUCK!

    38. Re:Open to Questions by whipslash · · Score: 1

      You're right. We're gonna work on this.

    39. Re:Open to Questions by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 2

      Some paywalled sites allow direct linking to articles. These should be exempt from the nuke-from-orbit order.

    40. Re:Open to Questions by whipslash · · Score: 1

      Will do. Any deceptive SourceForge practices are ending ASAP. No more bundled offers.

    41. Re:Open to Questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Uhh.. paraphrasing Donald Trump might not be the best of ideas.

    42. Re:Open to Questions by whipslash · · Score: 1

      Amazing.

    43. Re:Open to Questions by Sarten-X · · Score: 1

      Where's the suggestion box?

      I have a few items:

      • Have a feedback option that doesn't involve email. Have somebody actually read what's submitted.
      • Fix the justoposition between "brevity is the soul of wit" and accepting Bennett Haselton's long-form rants. Either pick one approach, or devise a way to keep the concepts separate, like having a separate topic for essays.
      • Resist the temptation to add to a story. The story is not the place to discuss where the editor was when he heard about the Challenger desaster or what specs are appropriate for a $50 computer. Those belong in the discussion. Perhaps give editors the ability to reserve the frosty piss, but keep stories objective.
      • Keep the stories objective. If you're running a piece about one company, discuss the company's industry. If the story is about one product, discuss that product's contributions to the state of the art. If the story is about a person, describe the person's actions, but do not judge them.
      • Understand what you have. This is Slashdot. We want Natalie Portman naked and petrified, covered in hot grits. We don't want attachments to Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, Google+, or Reddit, unless we've specifically opted in to those. We want things that are well-designed, not things from a designer. Announce your changes with a poll (perhaps restricted to positive-karma users?) and see if they're accepted by the community.
      • Stay involved. You're posting pretty often now, but what about next month? What about next year? You might browse stories now and then, but will a post calling your name be noticed? Are you Kibo?
      • Perennially, fix HTML and Unicode in posts. Lists that look like quotes and Unicode that looks like a simian's attempt at Shakespeare have been long-standing problems, and fixing them would go a long way toward establishing some trust with the users. Good luck with learning Perl for that.

      In short, take care of us, and we're happy to have you here. Our corporate overlords are dead. I, for one, welcome our new corporate overlords.

      --
      You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
    44. Re:Open to Questions by Harlequin80 · · Score: 1

      Good luck Logan & BIZX. I have felt for a long time that slashdot was a truly wasted opportunity.

      I'm not sure if you have been around the site for long yourself or not. But historically this site attracted people who actually knew about a topic and cared enough about it to explain it to us semi-literate unwashed geeks. If there was some way to attract those sort of people back to slashdot you will have a winner on your hands.

    45. Re:Open to Questions by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

      F yea! I'll be removing the black hole I had set up in my dns for Sourceforge in due time.

      --
      Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
    46. Re:Open to Questions by Krishnoid · · Score: 1

      Are you a nerd? If so, in what areas?

    47. Re:Open to Questions by penguinoid · · Score: 1

      Trump is not the first guy who used the phrase, "make XYZ great again". In fact, I'm pretty sure that thought predates written language, albeit not in English.

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    48. Re:Open to Questions by Harlequin80 · · Score: 1

      I would absolutely second the bringing back of sections to Slashdot.

      Other suggestions I would add are:

      * Don't try to make slashdot pretty. Make it information dense. Especially keep in mind that most of us use large desktop monitors with lots and lots of realestate to play with.

      * Push to topics away from the mainstream. All of us can use google news. For me slashdot was the place I could come to, to read about things that never made it into main stream media. Don't be afraid to go really esoteric as even if I was completely unable to comment I always found it fascinating.

      * Finally I would suggest finding a way to include the community in maintaining sections of the site. If you do bring back sections then I am absolutely sure there are people who would be willing to edit and maintain those sections. This site is about the community, let the community help.

      Oh and a real finally. Take the mobile site out the back and put a bullet in it. Seriously.

    49. Re:Open to Questions by penguinoid · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Can we save the cynicism for when they actually do something bad?

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    50. Re:Open to Questions by grcumb · · Score: 2

      My pop's favorite movie was "Logan's Run" - http://www.imdb.com/title/tt00...

      I know I speak for everyone here in the Slashdot family when I say, "Sorry to hear that."

      :-)

      --
      Crumb's Corollary: Never bring a knife to a bun fight.
    51. Re:Open to Questions by complete+loony · · Score: 1

      I'm sure you don't want to funnel traffic to some other middleman who is only trying to boost his own advertising revenue. As much as possible, find the original source of a story and link to that prominently. Science reporting? Direct link to arXiv or similar. We're going to want to dissect the paper in the comments anyway. If there are other sources with more context or analysis, fine keep them too.

      --
      09F91102 no, 455FE104 nope, F190A1E8 uh-uh, 7A5F8A09 that's not it, C87294CE no. Ah! 452F6E403CDF10714E41DFAA257D313F.
    52. Re:Open to Questions by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 1

      Can we please stop getting stories about trying to convince more of protected group XYZ into IT/CS/coding. Forced diversity is discrimination. Dice loved to push that shit on us.

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    53. Re:Open to Questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      When you say things like "synergies", do you do it with a straight face or do you need to stifle your laughter?

    54. Re:Open to Questions by shanen · · Score: 1

      So Mr Abbott, what can you say about the financial models you are considering here? Do you have any concrete plans to improve slashdot?

      (Insofar as I see the financial models as driving the way things go, I think those are really the same question, but no one as implemented a real charity share brokerage, as far as I can tell...)

      --
      Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
    55. Re:Open to Questions by AuMatar · · Score: 1

      How about reducing the time between posts. Its been growing for years. At 4 minutes between posts you can't have any type of response to people commenting on your posts. I generally just don't even bother to try any more, having to write a response then wait 5 or so minutes to post it just makes me go to reddit.

      Case in point- this post got delayed because I commented 2 minutes ago. Now I'm going off to play Civ. Normally this would just get the tab closed instead.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    56. Re:Open to Questions by whipslash · · Score: 1

      Ok

    57. Re:Open to Questions by shanen · · Score: 1

      Oh, I hate typos. Another feature I'd be willing to donate towards would be a grammar checker. Or at least a time window for editing, notwithstanding the preview...

      s/no one as implemented/no one has implemented/

      --
      Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
    58. Re:Open to Questions by Noah+Haders · · Score: 1

      Was their ever any more news on this slashdot related topic:
      "GCHQ Created Spoofed LinkedIn and Slashdot Sites To Serve Malware"

      dude, you should have known better than going to slashdoot.com!

    59. Re:Open to Questions by Kobun · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Hello Whipslash, thank you for taking the time to answer questions here.

      I've seen this comment by you a few times and I wanted to add my two cents. Hopefully this is as good a place as any to add them.

      SourceForge damaged themselves to an incredible degree in my eyes by their various deceptive practices. The tone-deaf (and obviously fake) customer care team responses about dealing with the malware, coupled with the lack of follow-up to any of their promises about the matter, was particularly insulting. That being said, SourceForge is not dead to me.

      However, individual projects are. The people behind some of the more popular software projects hosted at SourceForge were all too happy to jump onboard with malware bullshit and to spin and spin to try and justify their decision. FileZilla and PDFCreator come to mind immediately, and I'm sure I could think of another half-dozen if I went back through the software I use day-to-day and consider my history on that item's function.

      My recommendation (which I hope you will consider, but not necessarily follow) would be to hunt these projects down, decapitate them, and actively solicit a functional replacement (sponsor the fork!). I will NEVER use FileZilla again. I will NEVER use PDFCreator again. I may remove the DNS blackhole that currently keeps my organization safe from SourceForge's current shitpile, but the project folks who were happy to compromise themselves can burn in hell forever.

      Without quality software, there will never be any reason to again visit SourceForge, with or without malware smeared all over its pages.

      Thanks again for stopping in. You've got a hell of an uphill battle with SourceForge, I wish you the best of luck.

    60. Re:Open to Questions by shanen · · Score: 1

      They could probably raise some money by auctioning off the low numbers that have been unused long enough. That would be fake prestige, but I bet some people would be desperate enough to buy it.

      Hmm... Better idea. Offer the low numbers to celebrities as an incentive to join slashdot. Famous computer scientists or programmers? (However that reminds me of the need for a good celebrity email system... Kind of the dual of the spam problem...)

      --
      Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
    61. Re:Open to Questions by Z00L00K · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Some details to consider:
      1. Promote the Firehose more ( http://slashdot.org/recent ) - it seems that too few people don't realize that they can vote for stories that they have.
      2. Improved spam filtering so that links to stories on questionable sites doesn't have to appear at all. Also comment spam like this APK spam that has started to appear lately should at least be slowed. (Moderation option "Spam" that can be used without mod point loss should be possible for comments that have some spam characteristics, and if a number of moderators tag it as Spam it probably is.)
      3. There's no guide to what the color coding means in the Firehose.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    62. Re:Open to Questions by Cylix · · Score: 1

      Klaatu Barada Nee.. Necktie... Necture... Nickel...

      Definitely that word...

      Klaatu Barada N *cough*

      Ok Then!

      --
      "You should always go to other people's funerals; otherwise, they won't come to yours." -- Yogi Berra
    63. Re:Open to Questions by Noah+Haders · · Score: 1

      to be fair, thats just informal language. used to be, "try to to guagee"

    64. Re:Open to Questions by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      Bring back a focus on Linux and FOSS

      0.o
       
      AC, that's what killed Slashdot in the first place - it went from being "News for Nerds" to being "News for a particular philosophical and political subset of Nerds". You're not going to bring back the 'glory days' by replicating the mistakes that ended them in the first place.

      The same goes for "original content". Sure, there were a few pieces from Jon Katz that appealed to a narrow segment of the userbase, but there were also endless maunderings by Dvorak, the Bennet Hazelton of his day. Interviews, Ask Slashdot, Slashback, these are things that could work. But more maunderings and appealing to narrow audiences, not so much.

    65. Re:Open to Questions by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      That's REALLY good.

      It's one thing to have some info about related content on the download page another to bundle it with the package you download. Most of us here are experienced enough to know what we want. And quite a few here are probably able to build unusual things out of old floppy drives or make a Raspberry Pi powered AT-walker.

      Then we of course have the various groupings here that are for or against any of the following: Microsoft, Java, Oracle, Bitcoin, Trump etc. But that's not a problem, it's what makes this place alive.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    66. Re:Open to Questions by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      That's something we shouldn't touch unless you want to alienate half the world.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    67. Re:Open to Questions by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      *BSD developers have moved to Apple.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    68. Re: Open to Questions by BlckAdder · · Score: 1

      I named my son Logan for the same reason.

    69. Re:Open to Questions by whipslash · · Score: 1

      Hey, its the comments

    70. Re:Open to Questions by Noah+Haders · · Score: 1

      I always enjoyed bennett's rambling posts on random topics, and how he fixed these urgent problems while cooking an egg or whatever. the comments were always the best.

    71. Re:Open to Questions by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1

      Logan Abbott from BIZX here. Happy to answer any questions.

      How do you intend to make slashdot self-sufficient WRT to income/expenses? You must have *some* idea or else you would not have purchased it, so let us hear it.

      --
      I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
    72. Re:Open to Questions by Greyfox · · Score: 1

      Oh! I saw that!

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    73. Re:Open to Questions by istartedi · · Score: 1

      Do you get the reference?

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    74. Re:Open to Questions by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      "try to gauge". The editing farce continues...

      I read it as "try and gouge" at first, and had flashbacks to the Dice era.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    75. Re:Open to Questions by KlaatuVarataNiktu · · Score: 1

      Is that you Ash?

    76. Re:Open to Questions by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      That delay only exists if you post using the older, non-JavaScript interface. With the JS post (where you type your post inline), there's little to no minimum time between posts, though IIRC there's still something like a 20 second minimum from when you click reply to when you can actually post, which only occasionally is annoying when a one- or two-word answer would suffice.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    77. Re:Open to Questions by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      Friggin' funny.

    78. Re:Open to Questions by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

      Hey, you're stealing my thunder.

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    79. Re:Open to Questions by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

      My first account was in the 460,000 range. I would like it back, but I don't think anyone else would want it. Like my current nickname, it wasn't serious enough for some people, and they thought I was a dumb newbie.

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    80. Re: Open to Questions by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

      Hey, same here. My daughter Logan hates me for it.

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    81. Re:Open to Questions by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      That seems........improbable.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    82. Re:Open to Questions by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

      How did your parents pick the name 'Logan'?

      Perhaps they were big Michael York fans.

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    83. Re:Open to Questions by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      I see you advocatin'.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    84. Re:Open to Questions by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      Especially keep in mind that most of us use large desktop monitors with lots and lots of realestate to play with.

      This means get your developers and designers some 4k displays to play with, so they can see what we see.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    85. Re:Open to Questions by indi0144 · · Score: 1

      Do a "rewards" program for people to find and submit news about actual discoveries and game changers. Stuff you really must know if you're working in science or IT.

      Enforce somehow the focus of the site for science and IT, theres just too many blatant clickbait news that only touch IT or science tangentially but are sure to devolve in shit-sling threads about petty political nonsense that nobody really cares. Needs a Firehose 2.0

      I'd focus more on science really, the place where researchers go and present their findings to be reviewed by our armchair scientists, you get awesome post from those.

      The nerdgasm would be a subscription based "digest" where I can subscribe for a particular topic (eg. All Things Space) and get the best discussion from people that are actually working on the science and talented or experienced outsiders. Invite scientist and engineers from the companies that do the headlines, not rocket science really.

      Hope everything goes alright with /.

    86. Re:Open to Questions by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      historically this site attracted people who actually knew about a topic and cared enough about it to explain it to us semi-literate unwashed geeks.

      And now we just have a bunch of blowhards who are willing to tell you you're wrong, but not how you're wrong, or what's right. In other words, argumentative trolls.

      If there was some way to attract those sort of people back to slashdot you will have a winner on your hands.

      And maybe I can finally learn how anti-aliasing actually makes an image sharper. Yes, I actually had a guy argue with me, at length and for several days, that anti-aliasing (a type of blur) makes an image sharper, the entire time being unwilling to explain to me why I was wrong when I explained that blur is the opposite of sharpening. That's just one example, but there was a time that such an argument would have ended with either an admission by my opponent, after my explanation of the difference between blur and sharpness, that they were wrong and have learned something or, alternately, an attempt by my opponent to correct my own understanding (beyond simply repeating that I am wrong) and an admission that I was wrong and learned something.

      I used to come here to teach what I could about topics I knew and learn what I could about topics I didn't; now I just come here to beat idiots over the head with knowledge and try to scrape up some of the remains. I'd prefer to go back to the old ways, if possible.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    87. Re:Open to Questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Man your 30th birthday is going to SUCK!

      Just as long as it's Jennifer Agutter doing it.

    88. Re:Open to Questions by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      Dice had a vested interest in pushing for the hiring of whatever group most of their active users belonged to. BIZX, as far as I can tell, does not, so we should see an end to these stories. Hopefully.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    89. Re:Open to Questions by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      3. There's no guide to what the color coding means in the Firehose. Actually, there is, you just have to use Google to find it. You shouldn't have to, but you do. Oh, and it's very vague and really leaves you to figure out the details for yourself, but at least it points you in the right direction. more detail would be nice, though; this was clearly written by a developer who was in a hurry to move on to the next project.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    90. Re:Open to Questions by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      I wonder what the business model around /. is?

      In any case, I think meta moderation has not done anything here to improve moderation. I think a troll moderation has to be justified by the moderator, I know it is self serving but after years of getting 'troll' modes for dissenting opinion gives me this impression.

    91. Re:Open to Questions by macklin01 · · Score: 1

      Thanks so much for introducing yourself and taking the time to respond to comments and questions.

      On a related SourceForge note, I miss the old days where there was a side bar freshmeat feed of new SourceForge releases. Could we possible increase the SlashDot / SourceForge links this way? A running feed of releases would be nice, and it would help bring us back to our FOSS roots.

      Also, in the scientific community (I'm in the cancer simulation field), "grand challenges" are popping up, where there would be a dataset or two, and a challenge to create an analysis or modeling tool for those data. Some really amazing creativity can emerge from those challenges.

      It would be interesting if such a thing could be done here, similarly to the "ask slashdot" articles, but then linking to a development space on SourceForge to keep it going. I would love to engage the developer community here on our data standards and other cancer projects, and I hope they'd like to pitch in.

      Thanks -- Paul

      PS: Please consider stopping the SourceForge spam. I'm not sure I need any more "SourceForge Resources" emails on "Flash Storage for Dummies" and business intelligence / analytics / etc.

      --
      OpenSource.MathCancer.org: open source comp bio
    92. Re:Open to Questions by AuMatar · · Score: 1

      The JS based interface is unusable. I'd rather just not participate than use that piece of shit.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    93. Re:Open to Questions by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Actually, wow, I agree with almost everything there strongly.

      I'd like to see more FOSS, more hacking. Not sure about more original articles, much as I adore Bennett Hassleton's original articles, he doesn't seem too popular around here for some reason.

      I do remember slashback, yes. That was really nice and something missing from much of the mainstream media. It's really nice when stories aren't just 5 minute segments that disappear without a trace.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    94. Re:Open to Questions by Iamthecheese · · Score: 1

      What can the Slashdot readership do to help things go smoothly?

      --
      If video games influenced behavior the Pac Man generation would be eating pills and running away from their problems.
    95. Re:Open to Questions by stoborrobots · · Score: 1

      (4) port /. to python or node.js t...

      Nnnnnnooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo (breathe) ooooooooooooooooooo!

    96. Re:Open to Questions by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      What is the air-speed velocity of an unladen swallow?

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    97. Re:Open to Questions by crvtec · · Score: 1

      I prefer Ghostface Killaaaah from Wu-Tang. More stories about him?

    98. Re:Open to Questions by Alioth · · Score: 1

      How about proper SSL support? (Or in this day and age, TLS 1.2) The site's big enough where spoofing to steal credentials could be a problem. But you go to https://slashdot.org/ and get redirected to the non HTTPS site.

      How about IPv6? It's kind of ironic how we get many articles about IPv4 space issues, and the nasty workarounds like carrier grade NAT, but Slashdot itself still doesn't support IPv6 (even sites like Facebook have good IPv6 support). As a tech "news for nerds" site, Slashdot should have had IPv6 support years ago. It'd be nice to have it now.

    99. Re:Open to Questions by VValdo · · Score: 1

      This one is probably not low enough to be "cool". if only I hadn't lurked for a few months before finally signing up!! Dammit.

      W

      --
      -------------------
      This is my SIG. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    100. Re:Open to Questions by mccalli · · Score: 1

      It's still here. Try accessing the site on iPhone - beta a-go-go. +5 Troll for you post by the way.

    101. Re:Open to Questions by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      We don't want to crack down on the comment spam too much. Sometimes it's interesting or starts a meme (like the cow guy). It's part of the fabric of Slashdot, and the moderation system deals with it perfectly.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    102. Re:Open to Questions by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      "âoeWhat impressed us about Slashdot was the quality of the typical community member and how truly informed and educated they were on a wide variety of discussion topics that directly relate to todayâ(TM)s relevant tech news."

      Flattery will get you everywhere.

      Seriously, props for not calling us the "audience".

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    103. Re:Open to Questions by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure a lot of people would like to know your definition of "great".

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    104. Re: Open to Questions by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      You might want to note that more than just four times.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    105. Re:Open to Questions by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      So far I liked you, but this sounded like you're channeling your marketing department.

      Hint: Don't do that. We don't like markedroids.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    106. Re:Open to Questions by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Uhh.. paraphrasing Donald Trump might not be the best of ideas.

      Yeah, most slashdotters don't appreciate weak liberals like him.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    107. Re:Open to Questions by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Also "inline" should be " in line". And there should be a comma between "desperate" and "deceptive". Finally, it should be "Our focus is on making".

      I hope the new owners are taking heed of all this constructive criticism.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    108. Re:Open to Questions by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

      It's not cynicism if the negativity is deserved.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    109. Re:Open to Questions by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

      I'll give you my uid if I can ever figure out what my original username was.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    110. Re:Open to Questions by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      There used to be a good amount of original content on Slashdot, things like interviews, book reviews, articles written by Jon Katz.

      Hi Jon.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    111. Re:Open to Questions by halivar · · Score: 1

      Fucking comment spam is for cows. MOOOOO!!! MO-- aw, fuck.

    112. Re:Open to Questions by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      it went from being "News for Nerds" to being "News for a particular philosophical and political subset of Nerds".

      What happened is that slashdot started posting some political stories, and because these weren't generally by extreme right wingers, a lot of people started moaning about a left wing bias, which is only true in the sense that "not being an actual Nazi" makes you left wing.

      The subset of nerds who are blatant facists is actually quite small, but as soon as anyone criticises them they start moaning about politically correct censorship of their right to absolute free speech, as though pointing out that someone is a moron for believing that their skin colour or gender makes them a superior human being is restricting their right to hold those beliefs.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    113. Re:Open to Questions by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Especially keep in mind that most of us use large desktop monitors with lots and lots of realestate to play with.

      This means get your developers and designers some 4k displays to play with, so they can see what we see.

      Why? Slashdot is a site based on text discussions. There is absolutely no need for anything elaborate. If you want to view it in a tiny window on your seventy two inch ultra ultra high definition monitor, fine, but the site should be designed for and perfectly usable on a basic laptop.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    114. Re:Open to Questions by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Can we please stop getting stories about trying to convince more of protected group XYZ into IT/CS/coding. Forced diversity is discrimination. Dice loved to push that shit on us.

      Whether you approve or not, it is still a fact that it is definitely nerd news if Intel or Google say they're spending $374 billion (or whatever) on increasing diversity.

      In non-nerd terms, I wouldn't want the evening news to ignore news of Russia invading Ukraine just because I'm not in favour of Russia invading Ukraine.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    115. Re:Open to Questions by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Logan Abbott from BIZX here. Happy to answer any questions.

      How do you intend to make slashdot self-sufficient WRT to income/expenses? You must have *some* idea or else you would not have purchased it, so let us hear it.

      Since they can't charge for access to slashdot because this is the internet, and advertising is disgusting and immoral, I suggest they sell slashdot action figures and/or put on some live discussion shows.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    116. Re:Open to Questions by c0d3g33k · · Score: 1

      The deal just closed less than 24 hours ago, so there are no immediate plans other than to try and gauge the community and make sure what we do is inline with the original Slashdot spirit. Our company is profitable, so we have no reason to resort to desperate deceptive or underhanded methods in order to make money.

      Welcome.

      Our focus is making sure this community has the support it needs.

      https support would be nice.

    117. Re:Open to Questions by requerdanos · · Score: 1

      [Beta?] Everyone here seemed on board and then whoosh, nothing.

      This may be the best post in this entire thread. Just wow.

    118. Re:Open to Questions by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

      Wolverine fans, surely.

    119. Re:Open to Questions by requerdanos · · Score: 1

      I'll be removing the black hole I had set up in my dns for Sourceforge

      Sourceforce is (quite properly) blacklisted by default in the Ghostery browser plugin.

    120. Re:Open to Questions by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

      Was it .... Rumpelstiltskin?

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    121. Re:Open to Questions by jafiwam · · Score: 1

      That delay only exists if you post using the older, non-JavaScript interface. With the JS post (where you type your post inline), there's little to no minimum time between posts, though IIRC there's still something like a 20 second minimum from when you click reply to when you can actually post, which only occasionally is annoying when a one- or two-word answer would suffice.

      I use the interface you describe.

      And your assertion is factually incorrect.

      Moderate once, then want to post (and therefore, in AC) and you are in the perpetual wait bin for posting.

      Unless said javascript is running on some godforsaken fucking ad network (in which case I am not getting it) then it's not working as you describe.

    122. Re:Open to Questions by gustygolf · · Score: 1

      I have a small idea about moderation that would make ACs a bit more visible:

      If an AC gets moderated up, give the post a +1 bonus. In other words, an AC post that gets modded to +1 will get its AC penalty nullified and display at +2.

      That way, more mods will see the post (which causes more moderations to happen) and good ACs only need 4 points to reach +5.

      Currently I sometimes hesitate to moderate a +0 AC post because I know it needs at least three other mods to see it for it to become 'visible', and that doesn't really happen too often.

      I also see some registered folks that choose to restate the AC's post just to give it some visibility.

      (I think this could be expanded to users with negative karma, i.e. people who post at +0 or -1 by default.)

      Also, could you please make the default article view so that all posts get loaded by default? Preferably server-side, i.e. no AJAX or anything. I hate having to click "Load all comments" button once or twice just to get all the comments visible. Especially when the button takes 5-10 seconds to run. Thanks.

      Also, please make the web site display OK without Javascript. There's been increasing brokenness especially during the last year or so. For example, in the reply view, the post subject text is supposed to say "Open to Questions (Score:5, Informative)" except that the "Open to Questions" and "Score:5" parts are rendered white on white. The poll on the sidebar renders really strange too.

      Sorry, I'm not terribly eloquent but I hope you understand what I'm getting at.

      --
      "Slow Down Cowboy! It's been 58 minutes since you last successfully posted a comment" -- slashdot, driving users away.
    123. Re:Open to Questions by dylanf · · Score: 1

      Logan Abbott from BIZX here. Happy to answer any questions.

      Hi Logan, I'm the auther of one of the Android slashdot reader applications (S2 Slashdot). I know its early days yet, but do you have any plans for Apps on smartphones as of yet? Im asking really as would would like to know how long a shelf life my app has left. It completely relies on your JSON feeds, and if they are going to change, S2 Slashdot will become as useful as a chocolate fireguard.

    124. Re:Open to Questions by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      Hi Logan - Thanks to you and BIZX for being interested in our community. Are you an employee or do you have skin in this game?

      I've been here since 98 in various guises and post often enough. I post a lot but I rarely get mod points since the Dice folk took over, only if I meta-moderate which I don't generally do because I like to have the context of the conversation.

      One of the real spoilers is the way shills destroy intelligent conversations here using moderation, you put an effort fact checking a post, taking the time to construct a quality post only to have it modded into oblivion. A mod troll, so to speak, that makes you wonder why you bothered.

      Consequently most of the interesting conversation is at 0 where I got to see the massive underlying change to the type of users that frequent the place over the years. There are the shills, the propagandists, the advertisers and the trolls. Raw /. is not what it was.

      I'm not suggesting to exclude AC's, some are extremely interesting, however it is undeniable that they have had an impact on this community. If you are listening perhaps a discussion solely dedicated to how the moderations system can work better is due. Perhaps BIZX's biggest asset is the community itself knows how it should work, listening is also value on investment.

      Having said that I'd like to welcome our new overlords to a Beowulf cluster of Nancy Portman's hot grits in Soviet Russia.

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    125. Re:Open to Questions by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'll give mine away to charity if I can recover my original UID, too. It was a whole digit lower, and ISTR the first digit being relatively small as well. Alas, I have no idea what email address I was even using at the time, let alone if it still exists.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    126. Re:Open to Questions by nmb3000 · · Score: 1

      There were also follow-ups on stories that had been posted recently, and they were grouped together into a single article. This was called Slashback. As I recall, that was posted weekly. I'd love to see that come back.

      Ah, the Slashback section (I always thought they should have named it "Backslash" :) ). Also one of my favorite features, and one that got lost in one of the first "re-designs". I imagine it was axed due to requiring editors to actually work, but that's just a guess.

      I'd love to see the current code powering Slashdot to be released as FOSS.

      Would love to see this too. Put it up on SourceForge, keep it active, accept pull requests.

      Editors were generally unwilling to link to paywalled sites or sites that did sketchy things.

      And no more blog spam! It used to be such a faux-pas to link to blog spam or a link farm instead of the original article source material. Now we get links to kewl-news-omg.info instead of directly going to nasa.gov.

      --
      "What do you despise? By this are you truly known." --Princess Irulan, Manual of Muad'Dib
      /)
    127. Re:Open to Questions by Lab+Rat+Jason · · Score: 1

      Lol... mods should not be capped at 5 for funny!

      --
      Which has more power: the hammer, or the anvil?
    128. Re:Open to Questions by JazzLad · · Score: 1

      Don't be afraid to go really esoteric as even if I was completely unable to comment I always found it fascinating.

      I wholeheartedly agree with this. I have been in IT for over 20 years, but mostly in support roles (I'm not a programmer/engineer/etc). I may not understand 100% of everything I read, but I can't tell you how much I have learned reading /. that I never would have seen anywhere else. These stories are the "gold."

      --
      "If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear." - Every fascist, ever
    129. Re:Open to Questions by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      Where the hell did Beta go? Everyone here seemed on board and then whoosh, nothing. Like a giant vacuum where no one can hear you compliment the web 3.0 interface. It's a wasted opportunity.

      That ... that goes beyond the pale, even for Slashdot trolling. You might as well be reading out load from the Necronomicon.

      Well, Beta is one of the foretold signs of the coming of Nyarlathotep, the Faceless God and messenger of the Old Ones.

    130. Re:Open to Questions by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      Yes, it *should* be, and I wasn't saying it shouldn't. You know what you can do on a huge high-res display? See what something looks like at a lower resolution. Know what you can't do on your typical 1080p or smaller display? See what something looks like at a higher resolution.

      I'd like them to keep it usable on a 4" display, as well, but that doesn't mean I should desire it not to be made more comfortably usable on a 4k display. CSS has these things called @media queries that allow differing styles to overlay based on a number of external factors, including screen resolution (DPI), physical size, and pixel size; perhaps you haven't heard of them, they've only had browser support for about 7 years, 5 if you count IE.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    131. Re:Open to Questions by slashdice · · Score: 1

      Pro tip: rewrite your press release. Remove words like "synergies". Add the phrase "naked and petrified". Dump a bowl of hot grits down your pants.

      That's how you can restore ./ to it's former glory (hole).

      --
      Copyright (c) 1990 - 2014 Dice. All rights reserved. Use of this comment is subject to certain Terms and Conditions.
    132. Re:Open to Questions by slashdice · · Score: 1

      What were the terms of the sale? I mean, digg sold for like $5 a couple years ago. I figure Dice must have paid you guys 3 or 4 figures.

      --
      Copyright (c) 1990 - 2014 Dice. All rights reserved. Use of this comment is subject to certain Terms and Conditions.
    133. Re:Open to Questions by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      I guess the best question I've got, is if you guys are going to treat this amazing community as something to monetize, or treat it like a community. The growth of this site "back in the day" was completely organic because it was a place where geeks and nerds could come together and discuss things geeky and nerdy without the interruption of some douchebro who was more concerned with things that just don't matter. And, if said douchebro showed up and tried to interrupt, he would get modded to oblivion quite rapidly.

      I would think that the regulars here spend far more time on this site than the average "redditor" spends on Reddit. I know I do, because there's just better information to be had here, and far better discussion.

      Foisting decreased signal-to-noise ratio onto us through increased advertisement, paid-for submissions, and the disastrous "beta" redesign is exactly what caused a new crop of Slashdot-esque sites to pop up in the last year or so through protest. The previous owners were so tone-deaf to what this community wants that they were moving in the opposite direction even when all the hints and clues were there. It was very reminiscent of Microsoft and Windows 8.

      Please don't repeat those mistakes. We know that this purchase was a business decision, and that you're going to need to find a way to keep the lights on. We're comfortable with that - this place is chock full of IT guys that know how expensive a large-traffic site like this is, so we'll accept a few ads and such because that's the cost of keeping the door open. But this community is not one that will accept being monetized in every way possible, and you will have just spent an undisclosed amount of money to buy something that will shrivel into nothing if handled wrong.

      I'm hopeful that things will improve for the better, because it's very clear what direction Dice was heading with this site, and it wasn't headed to a good place.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    134. Re:Open to Questions by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      I ran multiple sites on SlashCode back in the day, and it's still some of the best software available for having a running log of stories or links with separate forum threads for each. An updated version would be fantastic, as the last available release is now 7 years old.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    135. Re:Open to Questions by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      I was talking about normal, non-anonymous posts. Yes, the delay for anonymous posts is annoying, but most people shouldn't be doing anonymous posts frequently, so it is a mild annoyance. The non-JS Slashdot interface has a multi-minute delay even for logged-in posting, which is a not-so-mild annoyance.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    136. Re:Open to Questions by Cylix · · Score: 1

      Yes, we shall choose which moderators we like and purchase monthly subscriptions. Perhaps, that will unlock emojis in the moderators threads?

      This subscription can be split between the moderators and /. owners.

      I smell a winner.

      --
      "You should always go to other people's funerals; otherwise, they won't come to yours." -- Yogi Berra
    137. Re:Open to Questions by whipslash · · Score: 1

      Yes very much so. Web development (Drupal + PHP), gaming (CounterStrike, League of Legends.. platinum), YRO, smartphones, RC hardware (drones, etc), startup news, and much more.

    138. Re:Open to Questions by whipslash · · Score: 1

      We have no immediate concrete plans except for to fix broken features, and try to get more revenue out of fewer sources rather than pollute the site trying to get a little revenue from a lot of different invasive sources.

    139. Re:Open to Questions by whipslash · · Score: 1

      Noted. Good idea.

    140. Re:Open to Questions by whipslash · · Score: 1

      Great to hear!

    141. Re:Open to Questions by whipslash · · Score: 1

      All noted. Thank you.

    142. Re:Open to Questions by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      I'm cautiously optimistic--seems like you guys recognise that you've got something a little different/special/original here. Good luck!

      (Don't forget to have them issue you your staff /. icon, BTW.)

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    143. Re:Open to Questions by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      Thank you for so eloquently proving my point and why Slashdot is increasingly irrelevant.

    144. Re:Open to Questions by RyoShin · · Score: 1

      I understand that it may not be worth paying someone to write original content, but why not solicit it from users?

      Bennet. Hasselton.

      I have no problem with editorials, but they need to come from the pool of journals (ideally) and either be posted as a normal article in an "editorial" section so users can hide all stories from that section, and/or make the story author be the post author so that users can elect to hide editorial stories from people they feel just ramble.

      Editors were generally unwilling to link to paywalled sites or sites that did sketchy things.

      In addition to this, I would like to see editors actually edit. Proofread summaries before submission (even just throwing them into OpenOffice or Word could find problems), make sure the summary doesn't overstate something (and, ideally, is as balanced as the source article), and don't link to random middle-man blogs. If something is worth posting, it should be from the source, so if a link goes to a blog that adds little-or-no value with a link to an actual article or editorial, then dump the blog link and use the direct link.

      (Oh, I guess I need to change my sig now.)

    145. Re:Open to Questions by Mr.+Shotgun · · Score: 1

      TMZ is a crap site but it is interesting how in an argument between someone named Martin Shkreli and someone named Ghostface Killah, that Mr. Killah came out as the mature one.

      --
      Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the (supposed) good of its victims may be the most oppressive
    146. Re:Open to Questions by shri · · Score: 2

      +1 for having a sense of humor. :)

    147. Re:Open to Questions by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Oh, don't let him scare you. We're all spammers and nutjubs here. Lest you think I jest, I'd suggest a click on my posting history. ;-) No, I am not really a spammer. I am rather verbose, however. I've written novels and novels worth of content for this site over the years. Most of it was both true and not trolling! I'm not even (by most folk's standards) a nutjob. I just figured I'd get your attention.

      Something to consider... I have excellent karma. No, I do not know why this is exactly true. I do know that it means that the community has, for better or worse, decided that my comments are valuable to them.

      That being assumed to be true, as is evidenced by that karma rating that I've actually had for years, means that the more I post, the more community-valued content is generated, which results in more page hits, which results in more revenue.

      That is all well and good, and I ask for nothing in return, but I'd wonder why I'm limited to 50 posts per day. That rule, arbitrary as it is - and allows no greater status, means that, by definition, you're (it is now you) intentionally limiting your revenue potential. There is, quite literally, not one change I can make to give you more community-valued content. Oh, I would... I'd happily write even more posts, as is evidenced by how often I bounce off the threshold.

      There was a time, albeit long ago, when this policy made sense. Now, theoretically at least, you'd want to maximize profit potential and the easiest way to do that would be by having the greatest assets you can have. Again, for better or worse, the community has decided my posts are an asset - as is evidenced by that karma rating.

      There are not many of us, less than a dozen in my observations (and I can assure you, I've made a lot of observations) who have this problem. It might seem insignificant to you but you're probably not aware of just how productive we have been and how productive we could be. We have been making contributions for years - valued and numerous contributions. Limiting us, those with high (maximum) karma, to an arbitrarily low number of posts AND allowing us to go no further is akin to shooting yourself in the foot.

      As for the karmic record, I've had the maximum karma rating for years and years. I can not go any higher. I would. Oh, I'd happily do so on some days and as time allows. I don't think that's a good choice but it is your choice to make. So, there's that.

      Finally, welcome and I wish you the best of luck. I will do what I can to aid in your success and transition. My email is public and I am even known to some Slashdotters in the physical world. I'm "that guy that writes novellas." I actually have conversations with people, learn things, and teach things. I am not unique, I'm just verbose because I'm not as articulate as I could be. Err... You'll adjust.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    148. Re:Open to Questions by jdavidb · · Score: 1

      Logan, this is probably the dumbest question, but how do I know that Logan Abbott owns the whipslash account here? Maybe this is obvious somewhere and I'm missing it...

    149. Re:Open to Questions by whipslash · · Score: 1

      Great points

    150. Re:Open to Questions by KGIII · · Score: 3

      Also, we're going to need a picture of you, you personally. It must be naked and you should be wearing nothing but batter for steak fried chicken. Oh, and party hat. The party hat is not optional, it is something you just have to do if you want to fit in here. Don't worry, we've all done it - you'll be a better person for it.

      This part is optional, but is preferred. It would be ideal if you could pose for that picture in a setting that is interesting. Most of us really like pictures from inside police parking lots. So, if you could get that picture from inside a police parking lot - you'd not have to worry about longevity of your account. You would be, I assure you, an immediate legend.

      I guess, if you really want to fit in, then you could try doing us all a huge favor and riding a flaming motorcycle (this is why the party hat is essential, you might live in an area with helmet laws and we'd not want you to be hurt) on your way to take this picture? It might be a bit too much to ask and I'd hate to be presumptuous but if you can get the whole thing on video then we'd be so much more likely to accept you as one of us.

      You do want to be one of us, right? I mean, come on, everybody wants to be accepted. Myself? Oh, it was slightly worse in my day. In my day, we had to do all of the above but we had to use hot grits. Let me tell you, that'll leave a mark! Everyone was so happy when I showed up at the parking lot to take the picture that they immediately threw a party for me.

      (You might not want to talk to us. Oh, it looks like a good idea on paper, as so many things do, but the reality is just a wee bit different but we do appreciate the effort you're making. I also figure that you need to be broken in properly. They don't call me Mr. Lubricator for nothing. Wait, it might have been Mr. Lucubrater... No, it definitely wasn't that last one... Ah well... But they called me something, damn it! Legend? Legendary? Oh, wait, I remember - they called "Asshole" and I told them that they were mistaken. It's "Mr. Asshole." Thank you very much!)

      (I did mention, in a prior post, that you'll adjust.)

      (I think I mentioned verbosity, as well.)

      (Oh, if you take any of the above either personal or wrong - you will not do well here. There's either a madness to my method or a method to my madness. It's a matter of perspective, I guess.)

      (Oh, they tell me that I'm sane. They also tell me that that's not how you use a stethoscope, that'll be $50, and get the hell out of my office. I seem to recall a little something about office supplies and being called a monster - also something about that not actually being humanly possible? I was dreadfully drunk at the time.)

      (If you have not smiled, at least once while reading this, means that I have failed at my task. In all seriousness, welcome.)

      (And if you've not yet run away screaming, you'll be fine. However, please be aware that this is a test. It might be a test of the Emergency Broadcast System but it is still a test.)

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    151. Re:Open to Questions by Tenebrousedge · · Score: 1

      With regards to open sourcing Slashdot, I am not that completely opening the code would be best, and I do think that it would be a hard sell to C-levels. That said, some recent version of the code needs to be open, and development should be community-driven. The Unicode thing should have been a bug report/feature request. GitHub would be the obvious choice -- aside from a little issue with +1 spam, their issue/feature tracker integration is rather nice. I promise that ad-revenue-driven feature requests will receive mature consideration. For realio.

      --
      Those who advocate genocide deserve every protection afforded by law, and none afforded by common human decency.
    152. Re:Open to Questions by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      The constant spamming of APK has caused that alternative to be considered invalid and impossible.

      Spamming must be defeated.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    153. Re:Open to Questions by ancientt · · Score: 1

      Wow. I've been going back over your responses and appreciate all the effort you're already putting in. I should expect no less, but it does come across as different from what we've come to expect.

      I can't expect you to go through the background of everybody who's commented to you, so here's my relationship with slashdot in a nutshell:

      • Long time and frequent visitor
      • Regular commenter
      • Rare story submitter
      • Rare financial supporter

      Despite all the issues, which you seem to have gotten an earful of, I still visit daily. I am often surprised by the depth of experience and knowledge shown by commenters here. That's why I come. I suspect it is people like me that you'll be focusing your efforts on, so if I were in your shoes I think I'd want to know what we value most. I value the insightful comments by people who really understand the topics. I value people who can disagree civilly and help me understand both sides of issues. In short, I value the community. I imagine much of your job will be giving the community a feeling of belonging, being welcomed and being heard.

      Welcome to a tough job, I wish you great success with it.

      --
      B) Eliminate all the stupid users. This is frowned upon by society.
    154. Re:Open to Questions by whipslash · · Score: 1

      Thank you. The community here is no doubt Slashdot's greatest asset. I think we need to make changes so that the community has a greater say over what makes the front page, if not total say.

    155. Re:Open to Questions by whipslash · · Score: 1

      There's no doubt the site has to be more community driven. Even editorially. What do you think about the community having a lot more control over what makes the front page?

    156. Re:Open to Questions by whipslash · · Score: 1

      I've been a long time reader of /. and posts like this are why I am so glad to be a part of it now.

    157. Re:Open to Questions by whipslash · · Score: 1
    158. Re:Open to Questions by whipslash · · Score: 1

      You're right. We should probably eliminate this limit or at least raise it considerably.

    159. Re:Open to Questions by whipslash · · Score: 1

      I think we need to give the community more control as the community here is, in aggregate, more thoughtful and prolific than any staff of editors we could hire.

    160. Re:Open to Questions by whipslash · · Score: 1

      Not allowed to disclose it due to contractual obligations.

    161. Re:Open to Questions by whipslash · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately press releases like these have to be approved by both sides of the sale. We'll get "naked and petrified" in future ones for sure though.

    162. Re:Open to Questions by cweber · · Score: 1

      Well, some of us on the new team have been around for a while. I remember a magenta and white version of /. run out of Rob Malda's dorm room.
      It's like meeting up with a long lost friend - happy to be involved behind the scenes now.

    163. Re:Open to Questions by jdavidb · · Score: 1

      Thanks, Logan! I was figuring it was in the story somewhere or a story I missed. Welcome to Slashdot - may your tenure here be long and fantastic, and may the omelet be tasty as a result.

      BTW, I had to wait to post this because I posted just 58 seconds ago in another story, so if you are looking for some settings to fiddle with... :)

      Still waiting after 3 minutes... I know this just means I talk too fast...

    164. Re:Open to Questions by KGIII · · Score: 1

      You'll probably be fine. Just don't let the crazies get to you. There are a lot of crazies and we're probably all a little crazy in our own way. There is, literally, nothing you can do to make everyone happy - and some subset will be vocal about it.

      You will be judged harshly. Your every move and statement are being judged and there's a whole lot of expectations and hope. You do seem to be VERY aware that we're a community and that, in and of itself, is a good thing. We're not an audience and you seem to know this. We are, literally, what makes this site - for better or worse.

      From what you've said, I think good things *can* happen. You seem to be aware that you're a steward and not an owner. You don't emphasis this, it's just in the tone of your posts. It's an essential difference and may really be significant. Of course, we got a whole bunch of lip service before... However, you appear to be a bit smarter and, well, we didn't really "fit" as a Dice Holding Incorporated Property.

      For the record, there are probably people here who absolutely dislike you, on principle, because the site is now owned by a corporation. Oh, they don't actually know what a corporation is but they've been told that they're bad. They don't know that there are even non-profit corporations - and will deny them even if you link to them and show them.

      With that *sort* of thing in mind, I truly wish you the best of luck and do not envy your tasks. I did think about tendering a semi-serious offer and then putting into something community driven as a held asset and then setting up a charter that created a community owned/operated board. Alas, I don't feel like undertaking that much work. I'm retired for a reason. I'm inherently lazy. So, no, I do not envy your tasks at all. Not even an iota.

      That said, if you can think of something that needs doing and there's a need for assistance - and I can help... Well, the offer's there. No, I'd charge neither money nor power - or even recognition. I might be inherently lazy but I know where I get most of my amusement and know that sometimes you have to work for your hobbies or fun. Thus, I'm obligated to offer and actually act on that offer.

      I do have a whole ton of ideas, often just little things, but I suspect you'll be inundated with ideas and I'd not want to overwhelm anyone and my ego is not so frail that I must be heard first and loud.

      By the way, you passed the test just fine. If you didn't smile when reading my post (even if it was just to mock me) then you'd probably not fit in. If you took offense, you'd definitely not fit in. If you took offensive action, well... You can see where this is going and I've already taken enough of your time.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    165. Re:Open to Questions by whipslash · · Score: 1

      I think a Firehose 2.0 is a good direction to go in. Give more control to the users, who are undoubtedly more insightful in aggregate than any other mechanism we could employ.

    166. Re:Open to Questions by Kobun · · Score: 1

      Maybe in time. For now, SourceForge is going to stay blocked for everyone except my lockdown VM. Too many broken promises and lies to extend any measure of good faith here. Show me that it is fixed, don't bother telling me.

    167. Re:Open to Questions by Harlequin80 · · Score: 1

      Looks like you stopped being active here back in 2008ish. Can you remember the reason why you stopped? Or did you just go lurker?

      Honestly I have looked for slashdot alternatives many many times over the last 5+ years but never ended up finding anything that gave me what I wanted. If you can bring slashdot back to the late 2000s I will be over joyed.

    168. Re:Open to Questions by cweber · · Score: 1

      I was very active on /. in the late 90s and early 2000s. Then life, work, and other interests took over. Can't day it was a conscious decision to stay away.

    169. Re:Open to Questions by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Seems like if you remember or could find an article that you might have commented on, you could dig it up and read through the comments and look for something that you might have posted.

    170. Re:Open to Questions by shanen · · Score: 1

      Perhaps a "lost and find" feature for dormant IDs? Not important enough that I would chip in to pay for it, but if there are a lot of people in that boat, and the implementation project was small enough, they might be able to fund it at my suggested charity-retail price of $10/charity-share. However, I'm dubious that you could design an implementation of such a feature that wouldn't have serious ongoing costs, too.

      Maybe if you limit it to situations where the email account is still valid and uncompromised, so the confirmation email is sufficiently reliable to revalidate the account without human intervention? In that form, the "lost and find" feature would basically be limited to a mechanism that searches dormant accounts and attempts to reclaim them?

      Hmmm... Perhaps an alternative project that might address the same situation using the algorithm toddestan suggested would be an enhanced time-window search? Is there currently any way to search for comments within time windows? The advantage of this feature (and therefore a reason I might support it with my little wallet) is that it is a more flexible tool that could be used for lots of purposes...

      --
      Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
    171. Re:Open to Questions by shanen · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the reply, though it was a kind of a discouraging answer, especially the mentions of "little" and "invasive". Kind of a tough combination to buy into.

      My suggestion of the by-feature-payment system would be to get a little money as a fractional revenue stream from a relatively large number of sources... The limit is basically how many projects you can get into motion and how fast you can evaluate the results.

      --
      Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
    172. Re:Open to Questions by Tenebrousedge · · Score: 1

      I had rather thought that was the way things worked now. Slashdot users aren't generally great about submitting high quality articles. I've only submitted a couple in my entire history. If there were some incentive to bring good content to the table, now....

      --
      Those who advocate genocide deserve every protection afforded by law, and none afforded by common human decency.
    173. Re:Open to Questions by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      --Logan - as a longtime /. reader, I would advise you to (ASAP) get one of those "slashdot" icons next to your username -- that's one way we know that you're part of the admin staff for the site.

      --Anyhow, others in this thread have posted some very good ideas, and I wish you guys the best of luck - just don't change the site too much. We all like the Classic Look and features, but the stories could use some more editorial efforts. And definitely keep up the Linux coverage.

      --Other recommendations:

      o 15 mod points instead of 5 (if you have high Karma),
      o Moderation access twice a week,
      o Eliminate the "Slow down, cowboy" crap for logged-in users,
      o Ability to re-edit your post with a 15-to-30-minute timeout expiration,
      o Better searchability for older articles,
      o More options for the sidebar / extra content stuff on the right.
      o Automatic -1 for APK-signed spam AC posts!

      --That's about all I can think of for now. ;-)

      --Anyhow, thanks for asking and for interacting with us.

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
    174. Re:Open to Questions by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      There used to be a good amount of original content on Slashdot, things like interviews, book reviews, articles written by Jon Katz. I understand that it may not be worth paying someone to write original content, but why not solicit it from users? I'd love to see more of an emphasis on Ask Slashdot and interviews.

      I've done it for free, but wasn't accepted.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    175. Re:Open to Questions by whipslash · · Score: 1

      Good stuff. Will look at all of this. Look out for a story soon asking users for feedback that we will use as our master list. However, I've noted this.

    176. Re:Open to Questions by whipslash · · Score: 1

      Testing Slashdot icon

    177. Re:Open to Questions by whipslash · · Score: 1

      There we go

    178. Re:Open to Questions by Wolfrider · · Score: 2

      --Good on ya, thanks :-)

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
    179. Re:Open to Questions by EL_mal0 · · Score: 1

      If you give too much control to the community, then you just end up like other sites that do the same. An editorial voice can help separate /. from the rest.

    180. Re:Open to Questions by whipslash · · Score: 1

      Yes we will always maintain an editorial voice

    181. Re:Open to Questions by treethought · · Score: 1

      Logan Abbott from BIZX here. Happy to answer any questions.

      I have no idea how long I've been reading slashdot, but I just had a hellatious experience trying to recover my slashdot password,
      which means it's been at least 0.9 really long times.

      Thanks for your attention to the site. No question here, just wanted to say that,
      for the most part, I share the sentiments of the folks who responded to this explicit question,
      though I can only hope we agree on which were sarcasm.

      It is news for nerds I miss -- I have fallen behind the tech curve in part because in the past I could rely
      on slashdot to keep me abreast of significant software engineering developments, with the occasional salt and pepper
      of "Guess What Blindingly Stupid Thing FamousPersonX did with technology". That hasn't happened under Dice.

      I was much happier with the old "non-beta" interface.

      I wish you well, and hope for improvement.

      And I agree that 666 would be a good userid.

      Peace and love.

  8. The layoff part can't be true by damn_registrars · · Score: 4, Funny

    There is no remaining evidence of anyone working at slashdot to layoff...

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
  9. Re:Possibly Good? by Xtifr · · Score: 5, Funny

    [...]and we can get some editors who actually read the site?

    And destroy a tradition that dates back to when the site was independent, and run for love not money? Blasphemy!

  10. From their website by dreamchaser · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "As a leading digital media company, we publish hundreds of popular web sites and provide advertising solutions for multiple industries such as travel & tourism, telecommunications, personal finance, credit, business products and more."

    I'm not sure if that is good or bad, but I think we can probably expect more ads.

    1. Re:From their website by whipslash · · Score: 2

      We're going to focus on doing a few things better rather than trying to do a lot of things poorly just to make ends meet from a business perspective.

    2. Re:From their website by penguinoid · · Score: 1

      I don't mind ads so long as they're not part of the story (including the story links).

      That way, anyone who posts here and sees ads they don't want deserves to see pop-ups, pop-unders, and autoplaying videos shouting obscenities at max volume. But keep the stories themselves pure, please.

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    3. Re:From their website by ksheff · · Score: 4, Funny

      but less articles that are just shills for dice.com. Maybe there will be a "travel & tourism" series for nerds who venture outside of their mom's basement.

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
    4. Re:From their website by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Another thing: it would be kind of cool if they journal system worked better. For example, if comments could be enabled for longer periods of time. I have a series of posts in my journal, and it would be cool if people could comment on them for a longer period of time.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    5. Re:From their website by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      --One more recommendation - Increase the Friends/Foes to at least 255. I tried to Friend you, but I'm at my limit of 200 F/F, and I get an error trying to remove one to fit you in.

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
  11. Oh well... by frootcakeuk · · Score: 1

    ...onwards and (hopefully) upwards....I mean, it's not like it could get much worse after today's post about Shkreli beefing Wu-Tang. (WTF???)

    --
    Remember kids: What's right isn't as important as what's profitable.
    1. Re:Oh well... by whipslash · · Score: 1

      Fat-fingered the post meant for the idle section. The people have spoken. Will be more careful next time.

    2. Re:Oh well... by Useless · · Score: 1

      Well, at least you didn't try to do the bullshit Dice did with the "Nervals Lobster" posts. (pretending news items were submitted by a user and not Dice marketing. That got *really* annoying.)

      --
      "Even Prophets don't know everything"
  12. what happens to theodp? by andy1307 · · Score: 1

    What happens to his daily rants against code.org?

    1. Re:what happens to theodp? by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      Hopefully they will make him a full time editor! The entire front page could be anti-education rants.

  13. NEW OVERLORDS by DuncanE · · Score: 4, Funny

    I for one welcome our new BIZX overlords... oh man I feel so lame ;-p

    1. Re:NEW OVERLORDS by whipslash · · Score: 1

      +1

  14. Attention new management by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Can you please weed out the bullshiat "you are all cows" homophobic rant posts that have been defiling this once great site for far too long?

    1. Re:Attention new management by whipslash · · Score: 1

      Have not seen one of those yet (acquisition happened late last night), but we'll keep an eye out.

    2. Re:Attention new management by 110010001000 · · Score: 5, Funny

      They could block him with a custom HOSTS file.

    3. Re:Attention new management by lgw · · Score: 1

      Also get rid of all those spammy APK posts littered everywhere. Figure out how to block his dumb ass from every posting in Slashdot again.

      This place just wouldn't be the same without his incoherent rants. It's like my weekly dose of timecube. Trolls are just a core part of the Slashdot experience - it's why we have -1.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    4. Re:Attention new management by whipslash · · Score: 1

      Can you elaborate on this so we can take a look?

    5. Re:Attention new management by whipslash · · Score: 1

      I was just thinking about Timecube the other day.... RIP Timecube

    6. Re:Attention new management by flopsquad · · Score: 1

      Zing!!

      --
      Nothing posted to /. has ever been legal advice, including this.
    7. Re:Attention new management by Drakonblayde · · Score: 1

      They could block him with a custom HOSTS file.

      Oh, how I wish I hjad mod points right now

    8. Re:Attention new management by penguinoid · · Score: 1

      There have been a few spammers, which honestly is rather embarrassing for a tech site. However, they are actual people rather than bots, and I haven't seen them in a while -- I think they're on a self-imposed hiatus. It would not be a bad idea to have a filter to find duplicate/near-duplicate posts, for when they return.

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    9. Re:Attention new management by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      HNNG! Great, now I need a towel.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    10. Re:Attention new management by denzacar · · Score: 1

      Can you explain how are those posts homophobic?
      I thought they were just someone being... well... retarded.

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    11. Re:Attention new management by flopsquad · · Score: 1

      it's why we have -1.

      Well, that and ideological disagreement.

      --
      Nothing posted to /. has ever been legal advice, including this.
    12. Re:Attention new management by nmb3000 · · Score: 1

      Also get rid of all those spammy APK posts littered everywhere. Figure out how to block his dumb ass from every posting in Slashdot again.

      This place just wouldn't be the same without his incoherent rants. It's like my weekly dose of timecube.

      Exactly. In fact, I think they should add a +1, Incoherent mod option so we can give APK's posts the visibility they obviously need :)

      --
      "What do you despise? By this are you truly known." --Princess Irulan, Manual of Muad'Dib
      /)
    13. Re:Attention new management by nmb3000 · · Score: 1

      Can you please weed out the bullshiat "you are all cows" homophobic rant posts that have been defiling this once great site for far too long?

      Honestly, given Slashdot's history of trolling -- goatse, gnaa, penis bird, systemd -- the Moooo! Cows posts are so benign that the moderation system can easily take care of them as needed (occasionally they are funny, as is the case with most troll posts).

      I don't see why so many posts here advocate using this ownership change to implement draconian filtering or banning or the removal of anonymous posting. All of that goes exactly opposite of what made Slashdot and what keeps is distinct from the hundreds of other discussion sites out there.

      --
      "What do you despise? By this are you truly known." --Princess Irulan, Manual of Muad'Dib
      /)
    14. Re:Attention new management by citylivin · · Score: 1

      Please don't. Some trolls keep slashdot light and fun so we dont start taking ourselves too seriously like reddit.

      The twist is that this AC is actually THE COWS GUY! trying to get replies that praise him and bask in their glory!

      --
      As a potential lottery winner, I totally support tax cuts for the wealthy
    15. Re:Attention new management by lgw · · Score: 1

      The Red Site has a "disagree" mod that isn't -1. That would be a wonderful improvement for /..

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    16. Re:Attention new management by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, you'll see it soon enough. Take a look at the next article that has anything to do with network security, routing, etc. Someone will say something about maintaining a secure network, and you'll get APK posting as anonymous coward extolling the virtues of maintaining HOSTS files on every computer between here and Prague as a somehow acceptable security solution. There's a few posters that he will reply to with this inane crap, whether on-topic or not, because they called him out on this nonsense.

      He's been doing it for months, and everyone knows he's an idiot, but he continues on. I guess you have to admire the tenacity; I just wish he would apply that energy to something of use.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    17. Re:Attention new management by ewhac · · Score: 1

      Honestly, given Slashdot's history of trolling -- goatse, gnaa, penis bird, systemd [ ... ]

      You left out Hot Grits and Natalie Portman.

      But yes, "performance art" has been a part of Slashdot's history for a very long time.

    18. Re:Attention new management by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      Take a look at some of the histories/journals of users who've been harrassed by him, e.g. me, Coren22, BarbaraHudson. I'll try to come back later when I'm not half-asleep and dig up/post some links. Cheers.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    19. Re:Attention new management by whipslash · · Score: 1

      Ok I'll keep an eye out

  15. Along with new management, great new changes! by Krishnoid · · Score: 4, Funny

    I hear they'll redo the site to update it with a more modern look. I think they'll set up a site with test modifications, and call it 'Slashdot Bis' while collecting feedback, which they expect will be nearly universally positive.

    1. Re:Along with new management, great new changes! by whipslash · · Score: 1

      False.

    2. Re:Along with new management, great new changes! by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      With the great undefining of the term 'beta' that has happened over the last decade, breaking out bis as a suffix would actually be sufficiently nerdy to work with. Well done.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    3. Re:Along with new management, great new changes! by whipslash · · Score: 1

      Hahah

  16. About BIZX by Brama · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Existing sites from BIZX are sites such as MyVoipProvider.com and 123Business.com. Just.. look at those two and draw your own conclusions.

    1. Re:About BIZX by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      It looks like I went back in a time tunnel to 1998. There can't possibly be any money being made from these sites.

    2. Re:About BIZX by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      So Dice sold the site to scammers?

    3. Re:About BIZX by 110010001000 · · Score: 2

      We prefer the term "SEO", not scammers!

    4. Re:About BIZX by whipslash · · Score: 1

      Our corporate site needs a refresh. That's for sure. Most of our brands exist independently so the BIZX site isn't the best barometer for how we will operate Slashdot.

    5. Re:About BIZX by whipslash · · Score: 1

      No scams here. In fact we plan to address all of the concerns Slashdot and SourceForge users have had in the past. I'm listening.

    6. Re:About BIZX by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      Don't worry about it. I liked 1998.

    7. Re:About BIZX by hymie! · · Score: 1

      Wow. Yet Another Wordpress Site. The "About Us" links on both pages are broken in the exact same way.

    8. Re:About BIZX by gerf · · Score: 1

      I also liked Winamp and Dialpad.com (also a VOIP site), and look where they are today!

    9. Re:About BIZX by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 4, Funny

      "It looks like I went back in a time tunnel to 1998. "

      As opposed to how joyously Slashdotters receive the smallest change to that 1998 style.

    10. Re:About BIZX by lhowaf · · Score: 1

      Hopefully, the 'design' of those sites won't affect /. since they don't have user-contributed content.

      The user-contributed content is, to me, what make makes slashdot great. If I were BIZX, I'd look for ways to get the users more involved in priming the firehose. If there are decent articles/summaries, the comments section will take care of the rest.

    11. Re:About BIZX by CRC'99 · · Score: 1

      We prefer the term "SEO", not scammers!

      I can feel a tingling in my sprunger.

      --
      Sendmail is like emacs: A nice operating system, but missing an editor and a MTA.
    12. Re:About BIZX by whipslash · · Score: 1

      You're on to something

    13. Re:About BIZX by tshawkins · · Score: 1

      Put it away, there are young nerds in here......

    14. Re:About BIZX by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      If it ain't broke... Any anyway, the most popular discussion sites often do look like they were built in 1998. Reddit is a great example. It's not even got that cool, green, slightly art-deco look that Slashdot has. It's just badly formatted text, and it's still insanely popular.

      Functionality is what matters. Slashdot is (sorta) functional, and has a unique look. That's what it needs. That's why everyone hated Beta.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    15. Re:About BIZX by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      I like the design. Much better than this modern crap with huge text and images and parallax scrolling, but zero actual content.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    16. Re:About BIZX by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      Maybe that'll be the model for new Beta?

    17. Re:About BIZX by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      May I suggest remedial English classes for the "editors".

    18. Re:About BIZX by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      the Slashdot of 1998 would still be preferred to the 'beta' of 2015.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    19. Re:About BIZX by sootman · · Score: 1

      123Business.com loads its 50 resources in a few seconds, renders as quickly as the content loads, and works with JavaScript disabled. (And it only wants to load 4 scrips.) Yes please!

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  17. Offshore by PopeRatzo · · Score: 5, Funny

    This probably means all us commenters are going to have to train our Chinese replacements.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
    1. Re:Offshore by whipslash · · Score: 1

      Best.

    2. Re:Offshore by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

      At least that means they'll have to support Unicode finally.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    3. Re:Offshore by Pseudonymous+Powers · · Score: 3, Funny

      Legacy Slashdotter: Okay, Chuan-Li, this is a story about a personnel change in the production team for a prequel to the Star Trek reboot, so you're going to need to say something snarky about U.S. labor law, but phrase it in terms of the plot of episode three of season four of TNG.

      Chuan-Li: I... want a raise.

    4. Re:Offshore by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      Given Slashdot's support for Unicode, how will they post anything?

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
  18. Re:so long by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2

    Where's the cows guy when you really need him?

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  19. Re:so long by lucm · · Score: 2

    Where's the cows guy when you really need him?

    How can you be sure it's a guy? Are you saying that women can't be cows?

    #cowsgate

    --
    lucm, indeed.
  20. not sure what's worse by eyenot · · Score: 1

    a) that treating slashdot as a money maker seemed to be a step in the wrong direction as far as "news for nerds" and yet here we go again

    b) that "nerd" has become so hyper-realized since the 1990's, that basically everybody and their grandmother is a "nerd", now, completely eliminating any point in targeting anything at "nerds"

    get dat granny nerd rap $$$, g's

    --
    "Stratigraphically the origin of agriculture and thermonuclear destruction will appear essentially simultaneous" -- Lee
  21. Inaccurate "dept" name by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

    It really should be "don't forget to turn off the lights on your way out the door" dept.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
  22. Re:Possibly Good? by whipslash · · Score: 4, Funny

    Waht?

  23. get dat granny nerd rap $$$, g's by eyenot · · Score: 1

    *animated old lady in a flower dress and shades*

    yo
    drop the pinochle, boise
    this senior citizen's about to get noisy
    i'm not crazy, just senile
    but i can pick up rhymes like mahjongg tiles
    my grand-daughter is a hacker, not a slacker
    windows 10 since july 29th, cracker
    taught this granny everything she knows
    like how to search amazon for dildos
    now i'm surfin' on over to the slash-dot
    point my webcrawler from my aol
    push the firehose button and blow it all to hell
    tony bennett, drop the bass you crackhead

    --
    "Stratigraphically the origin of agriculture and thermonuclear destruction will appear essentially simultaneous" -- Lee
  24. Re:so long by flopsquad · · Score: 2

    Where's the cows guy when you really need him?

    How can you be sure it's a guy? Are you saying that women can't be cows?

    #cowsgate

    Moo.

    Brought to you by the "C" in LGBPTTQQIIAA+C.

    --
    Nothing posted to /. has ever been legal advice, including this.
  25. two wishes by epine · · Score: 1

    If I had known I would still be hanging around here ten years later, I would have originally named myself "muscle memory" instead of the first lame thing that came into my mayfly head.

    Wish list, two items, sorted from the banal to the sublime:

    * working mdash and ndash in the text input box—it sends DFWesque-level geek chills down my spine to use the right one in absolutely every instance (please don't datamine the last ten years of my happy fiction)

    * story summaries where you can identify the story topic without having through to the story, and where the discussion can start with the implications rather than everyone leaning in with giant RCA-era ear horns "eh, what did the summary just say?" "fuck if I know" "eh, did you just say 'duck'?" and so on

    A lame story summary sets a bad tone for the entire thread. For some entirely ungeek reason so many summaries seem determined to end off with a woolly sentiment reminiscent of a late-afternoon chocolate-brownie special Olympics.

    Actually, this has seemed somewhat less horrible for the last couple of months, I don't know why.

    1. Re:two wishes by whipslash · · Score: 2

      Saved these suggestions as well. Thank you.

  26. Re:How does this work? by whipslash · · Score: 2

    Believe it or not, usually you can just start the process by emailing them or messaging them on LinkedIn.

  27. ACQUISITIONS ARE FOR COWS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Slashdot, Dice, and Bizx are all cows. MOOOO!

    On that note, I'll take the bacon and eggs with a side of hot grits, please.

    1. Re:ACQUISITIONS ARE FOR COWS by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      Natalie Portman is now known as bacon and eggs? Hmm... Interesting.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
  28. Re:Liberals destroy another site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Fuck off back to SoylentNews!

  29. Re:funny by whipslash · · Score: 1

    My bad x100

  30. Re:Possibly Good? by bleh-of-the-huns · · Score: 1

    Wow.. don't often see members older than me :) Been around long enough and seen many transitions.. hopefully this will be better. While I still frequent /. daily, my participation in the threads has been limited for many years now.

    --
    I came, I conquered, I coredumped
  31. Netcraft Confirms Slashdot Dead by Lawrence_Bird · · Score: 1

    still some hanger on's though.

    But seriously - when was the last time /. had any meaningful story before some other aggracator such as Hacker News? Rarely bother with the comments on something I've already read and seen comments elsewhere that for all intents will be similar to anything here.

    It is kind of shocking that the new boss says they aren't going to make many changes (at least not soon!) Might really be dead by the time they try to fix it.

    1. Re:Netcraft Confirms Slashdot Dead by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      When was the last time a site really got slashdotted?

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
  32. That's exactly what Slashdot should NOT do! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Holy fuck. The last thing Slashdot needs is to become another censoring shithole like Reddit or HN. If those sites have taught us anything it's that it's preferable to have real, true, open discussion, even if that means putting up with a few so-called "troll" comments every now and then.

    If you want dumb, inane, watered-down discussion, then they the fuck don't you just go to Reddit and stay there?

    Slashdot has a great opportunity to reinvent itself as a tech/science/math-focused site with an emphasis on unhindered discussion. The censorship you propose doesn't help with achieving that goal. In fact, what you're proposing will destroy Slashdot faster than anyone could ever imagine.

    So-called "trolls" are a good thing. They're a sign of vibrant, vigorous discussion. That's why we see so few of them at Reddit or HN: those sites have the blandest circle-jerk discussion the world has ever seen!

    1. Re: That's exactly what Slashdot should NOT do! by Cylix · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It is a terrible trend of new age media to down vote dissenting views. Only group think supported here!

      --
      "You should always go to other people's funerals; otherwise, they won't come to yours." -- Yogi Berra
    2. Re: That's exactly what Slashdot should NOT do! by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It is a terrible trend of new age media to down vote dissenting views. Only group think supported here!

      I'd be happy if moderators learned the difference between sarcasm, humor, making valid point and actual troll / flamebait and didn't get their undies inappropriately bunched. [ Note: I'm not holding my breath. ]

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    3. Re: That's exactly what Slashdot should NOT do! by dave420 · · Score: 1

      Are they being downvoted because they dissent from commonly-held beliefs, or because they are posting nonsensical bullshit vomited forth by someone who doesn't know their nonsense is in fact nonsense? Kind of like when epyT-R proudly proclaimed women can't be scientists? You have to be a lot more precise in your argument for it to make any sense.

    4. Re:That's exactly what Slashdot should NOT do! by jcr · · Score: 1

      we see so few of them at Reddit

      You must not be going to the same Reddit that I do. I see no shortage at all of trolls on reddit.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    5. Re: That's exactly what Slashdot should NOT do! by pz · · Score: 2

      And it didn't used to happen as much at Slashdot, but it has started happening more and more, recently.

      Back in the day (pre-DICE), you would get good, opposing views on a subject, when warranted. These days, it's hard to say anything that goes against the flow without getting voted down.

      As an example, I have, repeatedly, criticized the Bennet Hasselton dren that gets posted here, not because everyone else is, but because BH's writing is short-sighted, naive, and not worth my time to read. I'm happy that he seems to have faded away. What is so annoying about BH's posts? They usually start out with a mildly interesting idea, are long enough that they should be well-reasoned, but, about halfway through, one realizes that his writing reflects a college freshman level intellectual capacity. No more, please, thankyouverymuch.

      However, I found mysefl starting to join the bandwagon for StartsWithABang just because everyone else was bashing his posts. I found the posts to be often mildly interesting, sometimes informative. I dislike the straight-line pipe he has to publishing on Slashdot, and the linkage to Forbes, which seems to swamp any potential discussion of the value of his posts. That's the groupthink in action, and, personally, I dislike it in me and in others.

      The original premise of Slashdot was that individuals would moderate, and meta-moderate, honestly and, for the most part, accurately, reflecting an objective view rather than a subjective one. I call on the new owners to help us return to that model.

      --

      Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
    6. Re:That's exactly what Slashdot should NOT do! by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      I don't see eliminating AC as having anything to do with censorship. It would simply cause all comments to be owned by the person who posted them Assume, worst-case, that every troll just registers a throwaway account purely for one kind of post, and then goes right on trolling. Now that MooCowGuy is posting his drivel under a known name, we can Foe him under the existing system and his comments would accumulate the karma they deserve.

    7. Re: That's exactly what Slashdot should NOT do! by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      "I'd be happy if moderators learned the difference between sarcasm, humor, making valid point and actual troll / flamebait and didn't get their undies inappropriately bunched."

      It may be an old joke here, but if we had actual mod categories for -1, I Disagree and -1, This Violates My Religious Principles, much abuse of the existing categories could be avoided.

    8. Re: That's exactly what Slashdot should NOT do! by dywolf · · Score: 1

      yeah, flat earthers deserve equal time with real science.... /s

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    9. Re:That's exactly what Slashdot should NOT do! by Forgefather · · Score: 1

      Nothing sounds off a debate faster than a Troll on Slashdot. The sheer number of people that pile on with well written comments denouncing and disproving wild assertions is what keeps the site a relevant place for discussion. No one here packs their bags for a subreddit that will massage their ego in an echo chamber.

      --
      "There are lies, there are damn lies, and there are statistics"
    10. Re: That's exactly what Slashdot should NOT do! by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      It is a terrible trend of new age media to down vote dissenting views. Only group think supported here!

      I'd be happy if moderators learned the difference between sarcasm, humor, making valid point and actual troll / flamebait and didn't get their undies inappropriately bunched. [ Note: I'm not holding my breath. ]

      As a moderator, I'd be happy if posters could make some sarcasm, humor, or make a valid point without coming across as troll / flamebait. Of course that would require actually require something having wit, being funny, or containing supported arguments, while most are just posting reactionary near non-sequitors. Or just use some emoticons or other common internet notations for marking such efforts, as what is bare type on a page often does not convey the same meaning as what it is sounding like in somebody's head when they are typing it as they lose tone and other inflections that the English language uses to denote intention. [Note: I'm not holding my breath.]

    11. Re:That's exactly what Slashdot should NOT do! by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      Also, there are situations where people cannot comment on a certain subject without anonymity - people inside a company that are experts on certain matters, for example.

      I've seen plenty of posts from Anonymous Coward from people that are close to what TFA is actually about, and the reason we got that information is because of the "Post Anonymously" checkbox.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    12. Re: That's exactly what Slashdot should NOT do! by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      You don't need mods to call out the flat-earthers. That 's what the reply link and the sentence "You're an ignorant shithead" are for.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    13. Re:That's exactly what Slashdot should NOT do! by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      It's been my experience that the censorship on Reddit is what actually ENCOURAGES the trolls. A lot of posters start out with reasonable disagreements, then get so tired of getting moderated for simply disagreeing with the accepted narrative that they start to get pissed off and just start trolling in anger. It's a weird form of rebellion against Reddit's shitty system.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    14. Re: That's exactly what Slashdot should NOT do! by Bugamn · · Score: 1

      As Socrates's life teaches us, that's not really new.

    15. Re: That's exactly what Slashdot should NOT do! by cwsumner · · Score: 1

      I'd be happy if moderators learned the difference between sarcasm, humor, making valid point and actual troll / flamebait and didn't get their undies inappropriately bunched. [ Note: I'm not holding my breath. ]

      It is not possible to detect sarcasm and such, reliably, when only the text is visible. In face-to-face there is a lot of information carried by expression, body language and voice tone.

      If you want to use them, mark them.

      Although, maybe slashdot could provide a marking system.

  33. Re: Any deceptive SourceForge practices are ending by complete+loony · · Score: 1

    Good. That deserves to be on the front page, at least once you've got a solid plan for how you are going to fix it.

    Github is the obvious competitor you have to beat, or at least distinguish yourself from. If you're going to focus on source control you have to beat github on features. Make it easy for people to contribute to projects, while also respecting the contribution rules of that project.

    My suggestion would be to focus on the things that github doesn't do. If you want to be a trusted place for downloading software, help us to trust the integrity of the binaries you are hosting. Host build & test servers that can be used to produce repeatable builds.

    --
    09F91102 no, 455FE104 nope, F190A1E8 uh-uh, 7A5F8A09 that's not it, C87294CE no. Ah! 452F6E403CDF10714E41DFAA257D313F.
  34. Re:The moderation system needs massive changes. by sumdumass · · Score: 2

    We also need a wtf and stupid mod.

    Don't reveal moderators name or anything. Just limit their ability to mod the same poster to a couple times per mod session and make meta moderation a priority again.

  35. Get an advisory board by davidwr · · Score: 1

    Charities have advisory boards to represent their communities.

    Find some formal way of getting input from the community, with over-weighted representation from people who have been around awhile. Maybe set up a rotating system where anyone with good-or-better Karma and who has contributed at least once in each of the last 5 years and in at least 24 of the last 48 months and in at least 6 of the last 12 months and at least once in the last month gets a random shot at getting an invite to be on the "advisory board" for the next 3 months.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  36. Re:The moderation system needs massive changes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Clearly the meta-mod system that's currently in place is not working well, as we see far too much abusive moderation.

    "Clearly"? Everything is clear to a madman.

    Downmodding should be eliminated.

    That's the whole point of metamod. Normally people can be trusted to mod things the right way, but if they are modding down for personal reasons, someone else gets a chance to call them on it.

    You know what the biggest problem with metamod is? It's when they changed the UI for it from "agree"/"disagree" buttons to +/-... and didn't ever change the FAQ to indicate what the fuck + and - mean. Does it mean agree/disagree or does it mean the direction the original post should have been moderated?

    And I don't know how new you are if you think that slashdot's moderation system is broken. There are 2 main things it has that make it work:

    1: Every user doesn't get to moderate every fucking article, this is why Digg and Reddit moderation are so badly broken and cause group think and circle jerks. SO isn't quite as bad, but the "gamification" makes people care too much about points. Slashdot old farts remember when they hid your karma level because it became such a problem. (And the old farts also remember that it was capped at 50.)

    2: You rarely get mod points. As you read articles you generate "token" points that eventually result in getting mod points. This ensures that it happens to older users and people who actually lurk and participate. If you have an alt account that you never use, it will never get mod points. (And if you didn't know what causes you to get mod points then STFU and lurkmoar.)

  37. In all seriousness by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

    I'm looking forward to seeing what the new owners do with Slashdot.

    And hopefully most of the people here will be realistic in their expectations - especially when it comes to how fast a site with 4,000,000+ users can turn.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:In all seriousness by whipslash · · Score: 1

      You're my new best friend

  38. Re: Any deceptive SourceForge practices are endin by Cylix · · Score: 1

    compete? It can just be SF with git.

    remember when it was the place to find software? I do.

    just use the git finance model and get reviews going again.

    Hopefully the well isn't too poisoned. studies show it can take 2 to 3 years to rebuild trust.

    --
    "You should always go to other people's funerals; otherwise, they won't come to yours." -- Yogi Berra
  39. Hire some new coders... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Seasoned C++ dev here and would love to work remote for you writing new code. Attend conferences, etc.

    Reader every single day of my life since 1999, always posting anon but I do have a 4-5 digit UID iirc.

    Surely you have heard of what the Soylent News guys are doing... I could never remember to keep going there but I did like what they were doing and I think you should offer to join forces with them. They had sane demands.

    Wish you got back to the hacker/code-monkey feel with extensive coverage of open source conferences and a more relaxed editorial tone. The sarcasm and non-pc tones especially shaped the feel that I enjoyed.

    Keep politics out of here *except* all the privacy issues as well as NSA and government surveillance stuff which should be *increased* in volume. Examples....
            * John Kerry doing X/Y/Z -> NO
            * Senate passing a bill to backdoor encryption -> YES
            * Trump insults $MINORITY -> NO
            * Russian hackers infiltrate $COUNTRY's telcom and ISPs -> YES
            * Hillary takes a poop -> NO

    Help expose people to new things they've never heard of instead of just repeating the already-trending buzzwords. For instance when everyone else talks about a new Arduino board (could care less), perhaps you could mention something more obscure and hacker-ish such as ZigBee or whatever. If my non-tech-savy friend knows all the issues, please don't cover it here. Only new stuff without repeating it.

    Important, please assume the average reader is a daily one and not an every-other-day reader. That means *NOT REPEATING CONTENT*. I want to stress that I do my best to hit this site every day unless I'm literally ill, and then I'll use the [prev] buttons to catch up on my own. I think most people I've ever met who also use slashdot are the same. It seems the site now thinks we are 2 to 3 day consumers and it just regurgitates news for a few days as if I wasn't here to spot that same stuff yesterday or the day before.

    If anything, let me tell you that your presence in the comments section is a good thing. We all seem to revolt quite obviously when something is bad. The previous owners seemed "distant" and blind and deaf to all the complaining. I understand ignoring some small grassroots troll group but when literally 90% of the comments are supporting the same complaint, LISTEN.

    Another thing, we are more of a "get-off-my-lawn" type than most readers. Do not ever force anything upon me. You have no clue what us programmers do. I had coded some nice parsing scripts to layout slashdot in a console quite cleanly and wish there was a richer api to fetch the content as if I wasn't even on the website. Imagine offering up the whole site's backend API without requiring a registration id and throttle/rate limit instead? Boy, I'd code up so many cool embedded viewers inside all my favorite apps.... Provide the content and let me re-craft my own digestion of that similar to RSS readers but enhanced.

    That's enough for now. So far by just being here you seem to have a better chance than absent-dice. Cheers.

    1. Re:Hire some new coders... by whipslash · · Score: 1

      Excellent points. Have saved these as well. It will take me a while to get through to every single suggestion in this huge thread, but I will.

    2. Re:Hire some new coders... by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Keep politics out of here *except* all the privacy issues as well as NSA and government surveillance stuff

      Whether you like it or not, politics is involved in almost everything. It is the height of absurdity to pretend that, just because you agree with the politics behind something, there is no other sane alternative worth discussing.

      For example, if you have a military tech story, it would be impossible to keep politics (or economics or ethics) out without an entirely artificial stove-piping exercise.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    3. Re:Hire some new coders... by h4x0t · · Score: 1

      Other political type stuff that should be accepted:

      Police use clone DNA found at crime scene to recreate offender's facial features.
      Congress requires ISPs to manually censor slashdot posts.
      President to DM fifth ed. D&D campaign in the oval office, accepting player applications.

  40. Maybe we'll see the end of the Friday night fight by dbIII · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Maybe we'll see the end of the Friday night "SJW" vs "MRA" clickbait fight where assertions are made that sitting typing in an office is "mens work", as if we are all 1920s lumberjacks or something.

  41. Re:so long by penguinoid · · Score: 1

    How can you be sure it's a guy? Are you saying that women can't be cows?

    Sounds like bull.

    --
    Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
  42. Re: so long by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

    4chan is boring these days. Now /b/ is just filled with moralfags and normal people.

    --
    If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
  43. Re:so long by sumdumass · · Score: 1

    I would think it is possible for women to be cows but given the barrage of stories about no women in IT and coding i think it is improbable here.

  44. Re:Possibly Good? by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

    Realize that many articles posted are posted due to what readers vote on in the Firehose ( http://slashdot.org/recent )

    Go there now and then and do up and downvotes - it may actually change the site.

    --
    If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
  45. Openness and Honesty by penguinoid · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'd recommend some amount of openness and honesty. If in doubt, consider what happened when Dice tried to stifle the story on what they were doing to Sourceforge, and then tried to stifle that they'd stifled the story. While everyone here has been happy to hear from you, if they get the idea that you won't follow through with what you said or want something to quietly go away, they can get viscous. I think nerds place a much higher value on honest and efficient communication.

    --
    Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
  46. Re:The moderation system needs massive changes. by Shompol · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Second of all, there should be no concept of a downmod.

    Without downmod SlashDot will become a dumpster diving experience. I find the StackExchange system interesting, where each downmod costs you a little karma. I am not advocating it, as there is probably more trolls than modders on this site at any given time. On the other hand, the downmodding of unpopular opinions is vicious.

  47. Classic works great for mobile by raymorris · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't like the "mobile" site introduced by Dice either.

    As you may know, down at the bottom of the page is a link to use the "classic" interface. That's always worked great on all my mobile devices, even old tiny ones, and it works great on a desktop too.

    I check Slashdot a couple times per day, mostly on my phone. The good old-fashioned simple html of Classic works fine imho.

    1. Re:Classic works great for mobile by BronsCon · · Score: 2

      THIS! SO MUCH THIS! Keep the mobile site a I'm sure some people absolutely love it but, for the love of all that is holy, DO NOT forward me from www.slashdot.org to m.slashdot.org, I know which domain I entered and that is the one I want to see.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    2. Re:Classic works great for mobile by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      it's not so much fun when scrolling down to there you will go past an advert that hijacks the page and opens up another.

      like, get rid of abusive adverts. from europe you will probably never see them. thats how they get away with it, they purchase them by geoip to be shown only in places where the mods of the site don't live, so they have no idea what kind of crap adverts their viewers get to see.

      like, there's a difference between an advert and something served that just plain breaks the site visit.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  48. no more dups posted by timothy? by ksheff · · Score: 1

    we can only hope

    --
    the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
    1. Re:no more dups posted by timothy? by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      The abbreviation for duplicates is "dupes" not "dups". "Dups" would be pronounced like "cups".

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  49. Re:The WHO! by sycodon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They also announced the focus will move from technology to Japanese Girl Bands.

    3B Junior Rocks!

    --
    When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
  50. Not as valuable as they were. by Truth_Quark · · Score: 1

    A lot of projects left sourceforge when they started bundling malware with downloads.

    At some point climate science denial became vogue in here, complete with links to Forbes ... and removal of modding from people like myself who tried to keep that one scientific.

    There's a lot of goodwill to win back for a couple of environments that have to compete for users.

    Good Luck.

  51. Took longer than I expected.... by unitron · · Score: 1

    ...but I see the Slashcott has finally had an effect.

    : - )

    --

    I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  52. Re:Possibly Good? by Cylix · · Score: 4, Funny

    The old ones have awakened!

    The end is nigh!

    --
    "You should always go to other people's funerals; otherwise, they won't come to yours." -- Yogi Berra
  53. Re:The moderation system needs massive changes. by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

    So you like stuff like the APK spammer?

    (Silently ducks and slides away)

    --
    If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
  54. But seriously.... by unitron · · Score: 3

    ....how about on the stories that are not yet "official" but are available to logged in users (grey title bar instead of green), let them comment, if they wish, and then if the story makes it to the official front page, just move it there, comments and all, instead of re-posting it and losing those comments in the process.

    --

    I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  55. Re:no more trolls? by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Not linking to click-bait isn't anti-free speech. The article *still* exists.

    I just don't want to see /. cluttered up with spam.

  56. Disable advertising? How will I know NOT to shop? by shanen · · Score: 1

    Still a financial model comment, but I just noticed that option to disable advertising? Apparently it's something I said?

    So let me say a few words about our sponsors' advertising: Desperate. Bullshit. BAD company.

    Can't recall the last time I saw an exception. Ads are worthless tripe for a simple reason. It's quite expensive to produce a truly superior product, but it's relatively vastly cheaper to produce ads.

    Actually, the situation is even worse than that. If you did produce a truly superior product, the marginal cost of those last increments of quality are so expensive that your competitors can grab big profits by splitting the difference from good enough--especially with the support of advertising.

    Off topic there, but as it applies to slashdot, ads do NOT add value and I normally see all ads as red flags to AVOID shopping with that company. The MORE ads they throw at me, the LESS likely the product is worth buying. That's become a big part of what's wrong with the Internet, but inverting the model is probably too big a project for slashdot to tackle...

    Still... Perhaps you want a hint?

    (But I warn you that I'm so clueless I couldn't catch a clue if I was dipped in clue musk and dropped in a field of desperate clues in the middle of clue mating season.)

    --
    Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
  57. Sourceforge Project deletion? by auzy · · Score: 1

    Does this mean we can finally delete our projects off Sourceforge, or will they simply F' us more and add more malware?

  58. Re:Maybe we'll see the end of the Friday night fig by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

    Maybe we'll see the end of the Friday night "SJW" vs "MRA" clickbait fight where assertions are made that sitting typing in an office is "mens work", as if we are all 1920s lumberjacks or something.

    Who put on women's clothing and hang around in bars?

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  59. Slashdot is immune to outsourcing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Thankfully the lack of unicode support prevents that from being a real threat.

    1. Re:Slashdot is immune to outsourcing... by DeputySpade · · Score: 1

      I have no idea why this didn't get at least a "+1, Zing"

      --


      This space intentionally left blank
  60. Re: so long by prefec2 · · Score: 1

    Well, he does that because English still tries to apply gender to words. Of course he could write one or person to replace the he, but the him is hard. BTW most European languages suck at this topic.

    Anyway, some dadaist performance would be appreciated.

  61. Welcome by bestweasel · · Score: 2

    Please can we have stories written in clear English with unfamiliar terms defined and links to primary sources (but no paywalls).

    And please stop saying "synergies".

  62. Fix nested comments by Jiro · · Score: 1

    If you're taking suggestions for things to change, how about fixing this: If you view comments in nested mode, and the comments take up multiple pages, the successive pages don't work properly. On this article, the second page of comments repeats about 90% of the first page. Some cases even show the *exact same* content on the first and second pages; for instance, http://hardware.slashdot.org/c... at a threshhold of 0 gives me identical content for the first five pages.

    1. Re:Fix nested comments by gnupun · · Score: 1

      ^^^^^This!!!! How can a critical bug not be fixed for over 10 years?!

      This /. submission has over 500 comments, but in nested mode, I can read only 100 to 200 comments.

    2. Re:Fix nested comments by Lotana · · Score: 1

      YES! This has been such a big, annoying issue since as far as I can remember!

  63. How I read it. by ledow · · Score: 1

    "Fuck, we couldn't monetize those geeks after all, even after breaking our promises and showing ads to people with the 'Disable Advertising' switch that they paid for, and they had no interest in our jacket reviews, business management articles, or videos of utter shite, so let's sell it off cheap"

  64. Re:Maybe we'll see the end of the Friday night fig by dbIII · · Score: 1

    I keep asking for a link to those assertions. You have yet to provide one.

    I could link to any single one of those stories as you well know - so what exactly are you trying to do here?

  65. Here is the link - too difficult for you? by dbIII · · Score: 1

    Here is the link leading to a steaming pile of such shit.
    www.google.com/search?q=slashdot+women+not+fit+for+it
    Are you really so useless at using computers that you could not do it yourself?

    1. Re:Here is the link - too difficult for you? by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1

      Here is the link leading to a steaming pile of such shit. www.google.com/search?q=slashdot+women+not+fit+for+it Are you really so useless at using computers that you could not do it yourself?

      You said "assertions are made that CS is mens work", but you did not provide a link to any assertions.

      Let me be unambiguous: Link to at least one comment that supports your claim above.

      (Oh, wait - they're all AC's? The same people who post goatse links and ads for nike shoes on slashdot?)

      --
      I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
  66. Re:What about the SJW articles? by BronsCon · · Score: 1

    f you don't like justice and/or progress

    ah...

    we-must-force-girls-to-like-coding

    ...that doesn't sound very just or progressive to me.

    --
    APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
  67. I for one... by AaronBrethorst · · Score: 1

    I for one welcome our new BizX over...Oh, who am I kidding? I haven't logged in close to ten years. I'll probably log in again when Slashdot gets sold again to post about the same message. Carry on. /waves feebly.

    --
    No, but I used to work for Microsoft.
  68. Re:Maybe we'll see the end of the Friday night fig by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1

    I keep asking for a link to those assertions. You have yet to provide one.

    I could link to any single one of those stories as you well know - so what exactly are you trying to do here?

    You keep saying that: "You *could* link to it". But you don't. Because those comments you say exist, those sexist comments about where a women's place is... those comments either don't exist or are all made by AC's and have been downmodded into oblivion. Yeah, sure, you *could* link to "stories", but you don't have any evidence for your assertion - 'assertions are made that sitting typing in an office is "mens work"'.

    So, again, can you actually link to a comment where the poster implies that CS is mens work? Because all you do is get angry that people ask for evidence.

    --
    I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
  69. Corporate speak by qbast · · Score: 2

    " Slashdot Media no longer fits within the Company's core strategic initiatives"
    Are you going to leverage synergies as well?

  70. Going the way of FOX by Nexion · · Score: 1

    Hello,

    It troubles me that the dice fam has purchased the now sold out Slashdot. These days it is difficult to find unbiased news sources, and selling to a spammer company is telling. I hope everyone who made Slashdot what it was makes a killing off of Dice. I'm also somewhat pleased that I have found better sources of news for nerds on stuff that matters.

    Slashdot always allowed me to turn off ads. I never did, but now I will blacklist slashdot's advertisers via ghostery through my "untrusted" browser. That is, if I ever bother to come back. I don't care for Dice. I think they are, in my opinion, a disreputable company. You may, of course, do as you will.

    1. Re:Going the way of FOX by DeputySpade · · Score: 1

      Not sure if you're trolling or making a very subtle and overplayed "I didn't read TFS" joke, but Dice just _SOLD_ /. Dice were the ones running it into the ground.

      --


      This space intentionally left blank
  71. I checked twice by XB-70 · · Score: 1

    I clicked on the date on my computer just to check that it was not April 1st. - just to be sure that this story is for real.

    --
    *** Don't be dull.***
  72. Onward and backward by LabRatty · · Score: 1

    Can we get a shock collar for timothy, to encourage him to RTFA a bit closer before posting summaries :) Just a little shock... not too often...

    But seriously, I was here at the start and I would like to have a reason to come back to /. It got taken off my start page and into a once a week catchup folder a few years ago. Can you take Taco out of cryo storage and reboot him? Mind you, the patch list would be a total bastard.

    1. Re:Onward and backward by LabRatty · · Score: 1

      oh, almost forgot

      fuck beta!

  73. Better text browser support by mrplow · · Score: 1

    I'm reading Slashdot daily for about 18 years already using lynx (I very much like it that way), but for quite a while already nested mode does not have the full text of postings anymore. Would be nice if that could be changed.

  74. Greek letters... by Ecuador · · Score: 2

    And greek letters, we can't even write like "micro-" properly.

    --
    Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. Polar Scope Align for iOS
  75. Re:The moderation system needs massive changes. by Prune · · Score: 1

    Just limit their ability to mod the same poster to a couple times per mod session

    This is already the case -- you can mod someone up to three times per mod session, and any further mods of that user don't change post scores (while still using up your mod points).

    In any case, I disagree with such a limit, because there are many persistent trolls and posters with an axe to grind. An example (of the latter) is mdsolar, who has over the last few years submitted numerous anti-nuclear energy stories, then within the associated discussions bashes everyone who supports nuclear energy, with personal insults, false and misleading "facts", and worse. While moderators do punish various posts of his, he counters that by sheer volume. Limiting moderation against individuals limits the only corrective action one can take against such posters.

    --
    "Politicians and diapers must be changed often, and for the same reason."
  76. Sourceforge safe now? by perryizgr8 · · Score: 1

    Should I remove sourceforge from my uBlock blacklist? Or will they continue to inject malware?

    --
    Wealth is the gift that keeps on giving.
    1. Re:Sourceforge safe now? by Kobun · · Score: 1

      No, not yet. They haven't removed anything as of this post, only stated their intentions to do so.

  77. Re:You found them - what's your problem? by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1

    So next you'll want a Ferrarri and complain if it's not red? You are summing up all I hatr about these stupid "SJW" vs "MRA" discussions. Moving the goalposts - so a comment isn't a comment if made by an AC and then modded up?

    Listen, if you want to complain that men on slashdot are in favour oppressing women, you should be able to provide at least one post, right? AC's have always posted shit - trolls posting goatse doesn't provide evidence that slashdot is pro-goatse. Similarly trolls posting anti-women shit is not evidence that slashdot is anti-women.

    BTW: asking for evidence happens all the time. Some of the smarter oppression-olympics regulars (AmiMoJo, for example) now simply stop making the claim you continue making, because there's always someone who's going to say "where's this anti-women post you are referring to?", and then fail to be impressed when you link to some downmodded AC post that sits with the GNAA posts.

    --
    I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
  78. Slashdot comments have become a "me too" boys club by rlh100 · · Score: 1

    I used to read and contribute comments to slash dot. But the comments have become predictable pro-privacy, pro-freedom, pro-opensource, ra, ra, ra, anti-establishment and largely anti-government. Post a different point of view than the heard and you get modded down. I got tired of the same old points of view and the echos. Intelligent argument enlightens. Well it used to.

    I have also gotten tired of the misogynistic gamer gate crap when there is an article about sexual harassment or women's experience in the technical/gaming world. Boys explaining that the complaints are always the women's fault and that they should just get a thicker skin.

    So I like the articles, but rarely read the comments.

    It will be sad to see Slashdot decline more. I guess it is time to move on and let a new generation pickup the reigns with new sites and new media.

    An old gray beard UNIX/Linux Sysadmin
    RLH

  79. Re:Maybe we'll see the end of the Friday night fig by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1

    So then I did.

    You posted a link to slashdot stories, all in *favour* of women. The comments on those stories are not reflective of your claim "assertion that CS is mens work".

    In short, you claim "many people say this on slashdot", but then can't find any to link to.

    --
    I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
  80. Systemic Modding by Etherwalk · · Score: 1

    It is also worth doing some screening for systemic modding. While I haven't tried keeping track of it, I have noticed a trend of particularly disingenuous modding in favor of entities which can afford to have lots and lots of interns or propaganda units. You might set some of your nerds on thinking what kind of techniques you should be implementing to check for this or in response. Remember, aside from the health of the discussion on the site, even catching evidence of it one in a hundred times will probably give you great press from a business POV.

    1. Re:Systemic Modding by KGIII · · Score: 1

      I do not know the details, none of us do, but I think they have some sort of system for that in place with the meta moderation.

      I had someone claim they were going to down moderate all of my posts. They did try but I tend to be a bit verbose. They were getting five points a day, every day. Then it was less frequently. Then it was three points every few days. Now they don't do it at all - I kind of feel bad for 'em 'Snot like I don't have karma to burn.

      They'd always do the posts in a row and right after each other, I was actually able to watch the effects, in real time, more than once. It was all very ego-inflating. I'd never had a dedicated stalker before and having that much power over someone was nice.

      Alas, they appear to have gone away. It was kind of fun, I honestly kind of miss the attention. Someone was giving me their most valuable asset (time) on a regular basis - and they, literally, did so pretty much at my command. (It's all in how you look at it.) I was able to control their behavior. Oh man, I was like a tyrant with that - I wasn't mean or anything, I spoke to them like I speak to you or to anyone else. I did, however, enjoy that I could make them give me their most valuable of possessions - pretty much on command.

      So, they no longer get moderation points because they abused the points they had. It's kind of stupid because they could have easily hidden their effort a little. I say enough things that can be moderated as off-topic or the likes. They just went straight "troll" and did it for every post in a row - at about the same time each day.

      I'm not reverse-trolling when I say (or said) that I enjoyed the power and attention. Not only that, it made me think about my posts a bit more and that can only be a good thing. (Alright, so I was mostly thinking about ways to get them to tell me how much they hated me but I was thinking about my posts, damn it.)

      At any rate, they're somehow convinced I'm an ultraconservative, Republican, hateful, bigoted, - oh, and white. They seem to think I'm white. I am not. At least I am not very white, genetically. I'm kind of brown(ish), if you are curious, and I'm Amerindian more than anything else but there's some black African and white European in there to mix things up. I'm sure as hell not a conservative by any metric, I'm not Republican, I don't hate stupid people but I do dislike willfully ignorant people, and I'm so bigoted that I employed a mix of races, genders, sexualities, and creeds. I even paid them well and gave them good benefits and a stake in the company via bonuses. I just don't own said business because I sold it and retired.

      So yes, I loved the power and attention. Now they do a random drive-by but I know they're attentive to my every word. They post as an AC, the verbiage is similar as is the syntax and punctuation. They have a real account (hi Metrix007!) and I don't really understand their motives because the things that I say are pretty easily verified as they're a matter of public information, at least they frequently are. It's not like I hide who I am - I just don't outright use my name (David) in every post. I not only know a number of Slashdotters in real life - I invited the entirety of Slashdot to my New Years Eve fireworks/festivities, posted pictures, and gave directions in public. Unfortunately, on a few could make it and only two of them could bring their families. I didn't plan it out very well.

      Anyhow, there's some personal experiences and the fallout and causes. It's a bit verbose but I usually am. The meta moderation seems to have an impact on people's ability to moderate so that, with a little time, it corrects itself. I imagine they can pull from those metrics and see where the abuses are - and dig down as needed. uMatrix tells me that there are a few tracking scripts enabled and that at least one is fairly powerful - I'm familiar with it. Coupled with server logs and records, it should be easy to spot egregious abuses programmatically.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  81. BIZX, LLC? by tehcyder · · Score: 1

    Sounds like something from a 1990s cyberpunk novel.

    --
    To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  82. How about restart SourceForge from the ground... by Parker+Lewis · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ... and make it as a GitHub competitor? GitHub is good, but far from perfect.

  83. Re:Slashdot comments have become a "me too" boys c by ledow · · Score: 1

    I have to say that immature troll ratio is high. The fact that they no longer get modded out of existence tells me that everyone else is of the same mind as them, so it's a community problem.

    Fixing that is much more of an issue than just clamping down on moderation. We've gone from small geek clique to teenagers en masse who think it's cool to be contrary. It's especially noticeable when topics come up that were discussed years ago, that require a modicum of experience, or that require some of the older skills. The techy articles are gone and even when one does pop up, there's nothing new in it - there was one on processor cache design a while back and it was... lacking.

    I can't see a way back from here to be honest. Unfortunately, the "it's cool to be on Slashdot" crowd are also creeping over into all the clone sites. There's comments on SoylentNews that I read and cringe and just think "I don't want to be associated with you by being on the same board". Not just opinions, but the expression of them, and the trolling.

    It's time to move on but I've not found a place to move on to that's similar. Maybe the kind of intellectual-yet-open-to-all boards of old no longer work in the mass-Internet era.

    The articles went downhill long ago, the comments have gone downhill ever since, and there's not much left to stick around for.

  84. Re:The moderation system needs massive changes. by Teun · · Score: 1

    We also need a wtf and stupid mod.

    :)

    Don't reveal moderators name or anything. Just limit their ability to mod the same poster to a couple times per mod session and make meta moderation a priority again.

    Good points.

    --
    "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
  85. Obligatory xkcd quote by ctrl-alt-canc · · Score: 1
  86. job by hiallweb · · Score: 1

    nice post thanks for the information and visiting to your website helps me a lot AP 10th Class Result 2016 Latest recruitments

  87. Bravo! by SIGBUS · · Score: 1

    I was just about to suggest the very same thing. Sourceforge has been dead to me ever since that fiasco erupted.

    --
    Oh, no! You have walked into the slavering fangs of a lurking grue!
  88. Re:Possibly Good? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Yup, that guy sure has the /. mod spirit.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  89. Re:Possibly Good? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Sorry, this week I have mod points and have to behave. Trolling the firehose is something I can do again next week when I don't have to mod the shit that I upvote.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  90. Re:The moderation system needs massive changes. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    If we are going to fix moderation, the most important fix is to eliminate the funny and overrated mods. Things are funny because they are insightful, so just use the insightful mod. Things are bad for reasons, nobody should be able to just say "overrated". This would eliminate a lot of the stupidity from moderation, including pack rape with the funny mod.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  91. Re:The moderation system needs massive changes. by MrLogic17 · · Score: 1

    >Second of all, there should be no concept of a downmod.

    Look what that did for E-Bay. Single worst decision that site ever did.

  92. Re:The moderation system needs massive changes. by justthinkit · · Score: 1

    For some years now I've proposed something in between your two viewpoints regarding the overrated mod -- make it cost more. That can be in the form that using an OR mod pushes back the time you get your next set of mods. Or using an OR mod uses up 3 (or 5) of your mod points.

    Not all mods are equal. Modding down an obvious AC troll is at the "who cares" end of the spectrum -- we all stop reading such posts quickly enough anyway. Modding down a well-worded comment that happens to be in the minority opinion is at the other extreme -- a gestapo tactic. That won't get corrected (on average) in the metamod process, btw.

    The OR mod is the worst as the user of it doesn't even give a reason for using it -- "I vote you down...cuz." I would rather see more "4" and "5" posts that should be 2's and 3's, than see good thoughts buried.

    Maybe add a punitive touch to the system -- "worst mod of the week" where you then feature the post, and the moderator's name is shown. Pretty sure that person won't do that again any time soon.

    Since a big part of the goal of Slashdot is to encourage comments, why not have a thread on the moderation system say once a week? Maybe those who work at slashdot don't even post to it. Have it be a free-for-all, a true brain-storming session.

    You could make the worst mod of the week the name of the weekly "comment on the mod system" thread. Bet it would be the most commented thread every week.

    --
    I come here for the love
  93. Bullshit Bingo by simplypeachy · · Score: 1

    "Synergies" being the fourth word uttered. Subsidiaries created just for the transaction. Where's my bullshit bingo card? Quickly, time is running out!

    Also, props to them for saying they want to "keep SourceForge...as a trusted destination for open source software discovery, development, collaboration and distribution". It takes a massive pair to look someone in the face and say that. I'm talking about "I'm going to the shops, get my wheelbarrow" massive.

    Massive pair.

  94. Re:The moderation system needs massive changes. by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

    Is meta moderation still even a thing? I can't remember the last time I was asked to do it.

    --
    We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
  95. How much am I worth? by itamblyn · · Score: 1

    I'm curious what they paid per user. I wouldn't mind moving to a co-op model. How much could it possibly cost to run this place per year?

    1. Re:How much am I worth? by ledow · · Score: 1

      SoylentNews is struggling on a few thousand dollars per quarter, with mostly volunteering staff.

  96. Here here by Pollux · · Score: 1

    I couldn't have said it better myself.

    I'm another active slashdot user since '99. I'd also hate to see it go away. And to resonate what you just said, I think it's quite marvelous that a post about Slashdot being sold has become a post about what Slashdot is and what we'd like to see it become. Not to mention the fact that it's already has 650+ posts. I appreciate our community caring about our community.

    And I appreciate the BIZX owner who was interviewed who had this to say: “What impressed us about Slashdot was the quality of the typical community member and how truly informed and educated they were on a wide variety of discussion topics that directly relate to today’s relevant tech news. There’s a lot more noise on the Internet now than there was when Slashdot was created, but we think the Slashdot user base is one of the most knowledgeable and informed communities anywhere on the web. We ultimately plan to listen to the community.” I hope that means he understands the community and appreciates its value. Yes, he intends to make money, but let's hope he does it in a way that doesn't destroy the community.

    As a technology director and math teacher in the state of Minnesota, I appreciate the opportunity to contribute my perspective to this community, and I value the perspective of others who also contribute to it. Despite Slashdot's many struggles and failures, its community remains vibrant. BIZX, please don't destroy that.

    1. Re:Here here by KGIII · · Score: 1

      I don't think Slashdot will ever shutter its doors. It will never be closed down. It will never be allowed to go idle. Also, I should warn you that this is going to be long. However, in my defense, I not only have a point but I also have something more specific to share with you. I think that I'll wait until the end to do the latter.

      Why? If they did that then we'd be unleashed on the rest of the web. I suspect they'll go so far as to create a coalition of sites that all join together to fund Slashdot for the sole purposes of making sure that we don't join their user forums and frequent their sites on a regular basis. The rest of the web doesn't want us.

      Oh, we might be knowledgeable. We're probably TOO knowledgeable and a bit too diverse. We are, as a group, able to agree on any one thing. There are even people who do not use nobeta=1 in the URL.

      Don't tell anyone, I'm one of those people - except I don't actually see Slashdot as intended. I block scripts (which also means no ads) and I also use GreaseMonkey. I use a really neat theme with Stylish too. So, yeah, I don't technically use beta but I believe I've read a handful of folks who profess to like it to the point of preference.

      We can't agree on browser, operating systems, politics, business ethics, favorite companies, closed or open source, and have zealots in all directions. (If you don't notice the zealots, you might be one of them.) So, I don't know if they can ever really listen to the users. Even if they go with a simple majority, that's not even enough to keep happy the least vocal of proponents/opponents on any subject.

      We don't universally hate Windows 10 - to the point of preference. I know of only one other person who professes to use the same OS that I use (I'm sort of mainstream.) Very few people use the same browser I use. According to Panopticlick, I am pretty unique in my preferences - out of millions tested. Yet, I feel fairly moderate.

      To use those two examples and to give my two examples, I use Lubuntu and I browse with Opera. One is an official Ubuntu flavor and the other is now derived from the Chromium base but has the privacy invading stuff stripped out, some new benefits, and access to both ecosystems worth of extensions. Both, I feel, logical choices. As an aside: They're appropriate for me. I am neither a proselytizer nor a zealot. Use what works for you and enables you to best accomplish your goals.

      However, to continue with those examples, there's a vocal minority who will actually become abusive at the thought of someone not reaffirming their choices for browser or OS. They might even go so far as to repeatedly harass someone because of it. I am not a victim of this, I have just observed this - and not in the distant past but recently. They're vocal, logged in, and have aged accounts.

      So, they can listen to us but which of us are they going to listen to? They can straight up make stuff up and then say that they listened to us because it's a near certainty that someone holds that same view and is vocal about their support. Someone surely holds an opposing view and is equally vocal about their disapproval.

      Hmm... I'm on my second Slashdot account. Not only did I lose access to the email for the first one - I've since forgotten the username. It was a fairly random string of characters so that I could speak comfortably about the industry that I worked in without being harassed by folks who may wish to cause me a problem. I've literally been using Slashdot since before we actually had accounts. I don't recall but my other user was a four or five digit UUID.

      Why is that important? Oh, it's not my being a braggart or the likes. It is to simply use as an appeal to authority - which may not be a fallacy if one is an authority. I feel safe opining that Slashdot has never been consistent, has always been diverse, and has always had a subset of users who are both zealous and vocal. This is true on almost every subject - all the way from your IDE and programming language, to the file for

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  97. Take a step back from what you wrote... by denzacar · · Score: 1

    My advice? Focus on content quality - Slashdot could easily post 3x the stories it does today, and have better QA - just by maybe hiring someone with some journalism credentials rather than making the people who write the back end server code pretend to be editors. Improve the quality and make it "must read" material that people are willing to pay for. And try encouraging some writers to create original content - not BS video interviews with talking heads from sponsors, but actual longform journalism. If Slashdot is actually a good enough read, you can monetize a subscription tier that echoes "Slate Plus," "ESPN Insider," etc.

    In Slashdot's "glory days," it didn't have a lot of competition. There was no Gawker/Gizmodo/iO9/whatever to read about the coolest Star Wars prequel rumors; people came to Slashdot for that. Even though there's a lot of competition now, Slashdot (barely) hangs on to a superior virtue: a better quality of commenters and a better moderation system than other "nerd" sites. Slashdot was never very well managed, even back in the "CmdrTaco/Hemos Glory Days." Inject some QA into the story vetting/writing process and you'll see a resurgence of readership.

    It might become clearer that you are promoting things which are essentially opposite to each other.
    I.e. Readership and commenters - not the same people. Also, quantity ain't quality.
    "3x the stories" only mean that those who comment and discuss ON A SINGLE STORY now miss out on even seeing 3 times more stories.

    Say, you spend an hour each day on slashdot, and it takes you 1 minute to read through summaries of 20-24 daily stories and another 5-15 minutes to read through 4++ comments, after which you'll make 1-3 insightful posts, each taking you at least 15 minutes.
    That's 22+10+2*15.
    Little over an hour, on average. About hour and a half on the higher end.
    Multiply the number of stories by 3, and now summaries alone takes up all of your Slashdot ALLOTTED time.
    While a day still comes with only 24 hours in it to do all the things that need to be done "today".
    Godforbid you stumble onto an interesting discussion or debate.
    There goes your time for work, for your wife and kids, you get fired, wife leaves you and takes the kids, economy tanks, you turn to drugs and online porn...
    Why do you hate America so much?

    And while that might seem great from the "keep them glued to the screen" standpoint of a marketing drone - it clashes with the reality where, despite the popular opinion, Slashdot readership are no longer basement dwelling teenagers.
    A 6-digit UID correlates with a 30+ age now. And it's impolite to stare at one's 5-digit and lower UID. Cause they may die soon.
    That's 25% (or more) of actual commenters/readers. And where nearly all of the "better quality of commenters" comes from.
    Also, that's where the disposable income is, for those looking to "monetize" the "audience".

    At the same time, increase of the number of stories now means those same numbers of commenters comment LESS per story - cause they too have the same number of hours in their day.
    And as it took decades to reach 4+ million UIDs - there's no chance in hell that will become 12+ million over night to maintain the comments per story ratio.
    More stories to read == less time to comment.
    I.e. Increase in the number of stories takes up time and kills discussion - that thing everyone is here for.

    And if you somehow figure out a formula for better quality of comments and discussions... I reserve the right to be the first to congratulate you on getting the last Nobel Peace Prize. Like... the final one. Ever.
    As you'd basically discover world peace.
    Also, you owe me 10% of that money for the idea.
    Fuck it... Make it 9%. It IS world peace...

    As for gamifying moderation... which is what karma boils down to...
    You don't want to turn your democratic process (voting comments up/down) into a gotta-catch-them-all game of collecting perks and badges.
    BTW, remember achievem

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  98. The company's core strategic initiatives by NotDrWho · · Score: 4, Funny

    Apparently a bunch of nerds discussing tech and saying whatever the fuck they want didn't turn out to be the easy cash machine they expected it to be.

    --
    SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
  99. OK by koan · · Score: 1

    Now /. is dead.

    --
    "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
  100. Re:does this mean less propaganda? by koan · · Score: 1

    If you wanna see the full effect of that post something negative about Amazon next time there's an article on them.
    Amazing how fast you get modded down.

    --
    "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
  101. Re:The moderation system needs massive changes. by sumdumass · · Score: 1

    I find APK annoying but i can easily skip over the posts. The ones that really drove me crazy was the mycleanPC floods.

    Anyways, i am willing to put up with some crap from time to time. I purposely add value points to troll and flamebait mods so those posts do not get buried in my feed. Maybe I'm used to it?

  102. FreeCode aka Freshmeat.net by amccall · · Score: 1

    Was freecode / freshmeat included? Please, please, please - this is one site I was sorry to see go. There was so much history and potential there along with the old school slashdot. I hope it was, and there is some plan for necromancy.

    I've followed this site since it was CmdrTaco's blog (though as AnonCoward until explosion of hot grits). I doubt it's possible to recapture the late 90's / early 2000's style community here, but I second a lot of the comments about bringing back the older focus of the site.

    Also - please let us change usernames!!!! My uid ain't that high, but I'd rather like to switch to my normal online moniker and not lose past karma / connections. If not changing the username, at least let us change display name.

    --
    ------ 24.5% slashdot pure
  103. It is about the community! by openfrog · · Score: 1

    I came to Slashdot day after day to read the COMMENTS, on interesting stories and topics, but the comments.

    Because the community filtered the idiots, the corporate shills (and they are relentless), etc. to let emerge comments that I could read nowhere else: a spontaneous comment by Steve Wozniak, INFORMED comments, about copyrights issues, like NY lawyer for example, people at the top of the game. Informed and intelligent comments by scientists, or really gifted amateurs.

    Not a vigorous debate for debate sake, a sophisticated debate where you learn about issues.

    It's all about the community, and fighting entropic forces attempting to parasite it.

    It's all about the COMMUNITY, and having its best members come back, the one we want to read, because most have left.

    I am hopeful from what I read here and wish us all the best of luck.

  104. Re:The WHO! by Penguinisto · · Score: 1

    Aww, crap:

    From TFA:

    “We’re excited about the synergies this acquisition brings and see both our existing operation and the Slashdot Media business benefiting significantly as a combined entity,”

    The new owner led off with buzzwords - which means Slashdot actually *is* doomed.

    *sigh*... I'll start packing...

    --
    Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
  105. Want to please everyone? by null+etc. · · Score: 1

    I sincerely hope that the new owners just shut this site down. What's the difference between /. circa 2000 vs. now? Today, this site is frequented by the biggest bunch of whiners I've ever seen. They literally complain about *everything*:

    "I saw a typo". "I saw an ad". "I saw a paywall". "I saw a CSS style I didn't like". "I saw a post submitted by a user I don't like". "I saw a social justice warrior commenting on something". "I saw a feminist trying to ruin nerds' lives". "I saw a story that wasn't 105% technical".

    Jesus Christ. Just stop complaining about everything and go do something else, okay? Biggest group of entitled nerd complainers I've ever seen.

    1. Re:Want to please everyone? by neminem · · Score: 1

      Funny, your post just now was the whiniest, complainiest, least interesting post I've seen on this site in quite some time.

  106. Re:The moderation system needs massive changes. by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

    Even a troll may have a point! Sometimes I miss the "+1 Troll" mod option!

    --
    If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
  107. Re:does this mean less propaganda? by pecosdave · · Score: 1

    Interesting - I used to see that effect for Apple but it seems to have lessened.

    Seriously about Apple, post something negative about Apple, someone clicks your name, looks for other posts in other unrelated articles, then bookmarks your profile so they can mod you down next time they have points.

    I was starting to take Apple mod-downs as a badge of honor.

    I've started noticing that Slashdot is employing the Facebook style "post shunning". Even browsing at -1 I don't see all the posts anymore, say something not in line with the globalist agenda and you get sidelined. If you click on a parent post you'll see the shunned replies, but otherwise they're vapor. I've set my Slashdot back to classic and there seems to be less of that but I'm still not sure I see it all.

    I see for calls to change the mod system - as someone who's been abused by Apple Fanbois I disagree, meta-moderation was great and the system itself was genius. I just want it to go back, it was great, with enough Meta Moderation fanbois lose their bite.

    --
    The preceding post was not a Slashvertisement.
  108. Synergies? by atheos · · Score: 1

    "We’re excited about the synergies this acquisition" I had to stop reading at this point.

  109. Re:The moderation system needs massive changes. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    Is meta moderation still even a thing? I can't remember the last time I was asked to do it.

    not only is it still a thing but there is even a redirect from /metamod.pl to the new address. that's commitment.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  110. you're holding that whip all wrong by Pseudonymous+Powers · · Score: 1

    I'm a little late to the unsolicited advice party here, but here's some anyway:

    I invite the new corporate overlords to think of Slashdot as a cougar in a cage. If you feed him meat, he will tolerate you. If you keep trying to feed him stuff that's not meat, he will eventually die, but not before he makes his best attempt to catch and eat you. If you attempt to sell him consulting services or try to force him to behave like a "civilized human being", he will initially ignore you, because he is in fact a cougar, and has no need for either consulting services or manners. And if you persist at it long enough to become annoying, he will, again, attempt to eat you.

  111. Re:The moderation system needs massive changes. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    How about even just putting some verbage back into the rules/FAQ/etc about focusing on positive moderation?

    The biggest problem with moderation is that you can't moderate and comment in the same discussion. It would be double-plus awesome if you could at least post in a different thread. I understand why you don't want people to be moderating direct replies, but the truth is that the people best-qualified to comment are also the people best-qualified to moderate. There must be some better way to solve this problem than to prevent the people best-qualified to do both from doing both.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  112. Re:no more trolls? by wbr1 · · Score: 1

    Why hello startswithsometrash, fancy seeing you using a crap argument....

    --
    Silence is a state of mime.
  113. It was a nice run by tkrotchko · · Score: 1

    Bizx.info is an advertising platform. I can't see that slashdot will become anything other than an advertising platform, with less emphasis on tech that matters.

    You can see it basically being folded up into a larger advertising platform that will have all the charm of TMZ or Gawker.

    Oh well. It was a good run though.... what 20 years?

    --
    You were mistaken. Which is odd, since memory shouldn't be a problem for you
  114. Re:The moderation system needs massive changes. by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

    Whatever happened to metamod? I used to get a link for that about once a week, and then it just vanished.

    It was nice to be able to either confirm some positive mods, and do away with abusive moderations.

    --
    Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
  115. Can we have by safetyinnumbers · · Score: 1

    Emojis along with Like/Love/Sad/Angry/Happy/Wow moderation?

  116. Re:The WHO! by blue9steel · · Score: 1

    I'm ok with that if they move to a picture heavy format.

  117. Long timer here ... by kbahey · · Score: 1

    I have been a regular visitor/commenter on Slashdot for over 16 years.

    There are some quick fixes to be done, both technology and editorial.

    - This site is about one thing: discussion! Not the articles, not the editorializing. Discussion is why everyone comes here. The stories are just jumping points for discussions.

    - Fix Unicode. It is 2016 now, and it took a motivated programmer on SoylentNews a moderate effort to fix Unicode in Slashcode. Go get the fix from there.

    - Stop linking to sites that don't display right with Javascript and/or Ad blockers. We are nerds here, and most of us disable Javascript and have ad blockers. Sites like Forbes is not welcome here, and daily posts by StartsWithABang are frustrating.

    - Move back the main link to the article from the story title, down in the text. The colors make this link all but invisible, and we get side discussions of "there is no link in the story", "yes, there is, it is in the title", and these are unnecessary and frustrating.

    - Freeze any UI changes. Do not even go back to the pre-beta version of the site. Just freeze it to what has been running for many months and users have gotten accustomed to. The exception is invisible links, and when foreground and background are the same color when mousing over.

    Will post more if I think of some.

    1. Re:Long timer here ... by whipslash · · Score: 1

      I agree with most or all of this. What do you think about giving the community more control of what appears on the front page?

    2. Re:Long timer here ... by kbahey · · Score: 1

      The community already has a say (or sorts) on what goes on the front page, by voting on the firehose.

      Perhaps it can be tweaked to give more weight for the community input.

      But in all cases, editorial control should be maintained by a few who have varied outlooks. The front page should never be totally automated, because that is a recipe for ruining the site, as has happened to others (e.g. Digg)

    3. Re:Long timer here ... by whipslash · · Score: 1

      Right- that's what I'm getting at. Just weighting community voting more heavily.

    4. Re:Long timer here ... by EL_mal0 · · Score: 1

      I'm a few days late here, but I personally prefer to have less community voting in what makes it to the front page. I'd like to see editors picking the best stories that are of interest to the community. Fewer, more relevant stories.

  118. > 900 comments by NotInHere · · Score: 5, Funny

    They should sell slashdot more often.

  119. Re:Hire some new coders...EVERYDAY READER ALSO by C0L0PH0N · · Score: 1

    Just wanted to add that I also have been an everyday reader since the late 1990's. My deepest regret is that I couldn't remember my login from then, so I had to make a new one about 10 years ago. Darn :). I haven't made many posts, but love this site!!!! I agree with almost all the comments here on what makes this site so compelling. I like posts about FOSS, Linux, etc, and issues surrounding them. (Glad SCO died the terrible death it deserved!!). I enjoy articles about cutting edge issues and tech, and hope Slashdot lives long and prospers.

  120. Re:The moderation system needs massive changes. by The-Ixian · · Score: 1

    I agree with this.

    I have never done the "post as AC in order to moderate in the same discussion" thing and there have been times when I throw away all mods done in order to comment. It is not a deal breaker, but I do like the idea of not being able to moderate in threads you have commented it (but being able to moderate in the same discussion).

    --
    My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
  121. Re:Possibly Good? by AcquaCow · · Score: 1

    Who are you calling old?

    --

    up 12 days, 22:30, 2 users, load averages: 993.20, 994.21, 994.56
    *makes note to limit user processes...
  122. Best of Luck by jjn1056 · · Score: 1

    I hope we regain some good reasons for me to bother logging in...

    Used to read this a lot, have account from like 1995 or something. Lately its just people complaining about stuff I think is way less important than it really is, although maybe I'm just getting older and all the things you young-ins care about is meaningless to me :)

    --
    Peace, or Not?
  123. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  124. One other wierd thing by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

    The folks that frequent this site _love_ guns. To a disturbing degree, as will be demonstrated by this comment being down-modded into oblivion.

    1. Re:One other wierd thing by whipslash · · Score: 1

      Interesting.

  125. width causing side scroll IS an annoyance by raymorris · · Score: 1

    In the Android browser, I don't get the same issue of the blank grey area, but I do have to scroll sideways. Whichever element has it's width set to pixels or inches, they should remove that width declaration or set it to a percentage. Then the browser can flow the page to the appropriate width.

  126. July 2015 by slapout · · Score: 1

    "DHI first announced its plan to sell Slashdot Media in July 2015"

    Tell me again, when was the Slashdot beta?

    --
    Coder's Stone: The programming language quick ref for iPad
  127. Re:The WHO! by Aighearach · · Score: 1

    They also announced the focus will move from technology to Japanese Girl Bands.

    3B Junior Rocks!

    Oh good, about time they improved things around here.

    Domo Arigato Mr Roboto!

  128. Re:The WHO! by Aighearach · · Score: 1

    Click the link to their website, and you can understand where things stand. The Age of Slashvertisement hasn't even begun yet....

  129. Re:The moderation system needs massive changes. by budgenator · · Score: 1

    Clueless and Groupthink maybe?

    --
    Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
  130. Should be good... by edibobb · · Score: 2
  131. Sourceforge by snookiex · · Score: 1

    As a project maintainer myself, I really fear for Sourceforge. It seems to be progressively becoming Geocities and I'd rather stab a fork in my eye before migrating my project to some sort of social network crap like GitHub. Did that sound resentful much? :D

    --
    Open Source Network Inventory for the masses! Kuwaiba
  132. Re: 900 comments by StormReaver · · Score: 1

    They should sell slashdot more often.

    Give it a few hours, and Slashdot will post a story about how it's being sold to someone named, "Rob Malda."

  133. Great comment moderation, but room for improvement by GPS+Pilot · · Score: 1

    Slashdot's comment moderation system is better than just about every other site's, but there is still room for improvement.

    Why cap comment scores at 5? Because of that arbitrary cap, we end up with some +5 comments that are much better than others.

    Lift the cap, so users can see what the Slashdot community really thinks about each comment. Then we will see, for example, the occasional incredibly profound comment attain a score of +10, and we can filter accordingly if there are a large number of +5s and we don't have time to read them all.

    --
    That that is is that that that that is not is not.
  134. Re:Maybe we'll see the end of the Friday night fig by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

    Great, that was my Friday night for three next seven years.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  135. As an mid-old-time poster, who'd stopped visiting by Shemmie · · Score: 1

    Seems I stopped visiting around 2 years ago... but I've been reading a lot more, recently.

    /. seems to have mostly escaped the "can't allow wrong-think" that's hit a lot of the other big sites - and that itself is enough to bring me back.

    As a regular user back then, I'd say it'd be awesome to see some stability return, no "We've got a sexy new UI to roll out / THE GOGGLES THEY DO NOTHING!", and just focus on giving the ancient nerds of the net a lovely place for our eventual retirement homes.

  136. Getting Slashdotted by MrKaos · · Score: 1

    I thought the slashdot effect and being slashdotted were by far the highest form of endorsement based on competence, the ability to attract interest as opposed to forcing it on people. Perhaps it's the business model advertising can eventually evolve into. I found it most telling when people simply weren't ready for being slashdotted, that told me something about the sincerity of the people behind the product. They had spent more resources making something cool than on annoying ads.

    To frame it in the context of a once popular slashdot meme, In Soviet Russia, you annoy advertisers.

    --
    My ism, it's full of beliefs.
  137. Re:so long by flopsquad · · Score: 1

    I think I can figure out all the other ones... but what is the '+' supposed to represent?

    I believe it's an inclusivity catch-all. One writer called it "and beyond." Going by my construction above, it appears not to include identifying as bovine.

    --
    Nothing posted to /. has ever been legal advice, including this.
  138. Re: Any deceptive SourceForge practices are ending by whipslash · · Score: 1

    It'll be front page as soon as we fix it. Thanks for the suggestions.

  139. Doomed, doomed by SignOfZeta · · Score: 1

    But what does that say about us? The majority of you (myself included) will be on here until the last day, long after it's Geocitied or MySpaced itself.

  140. Essentially this is code for ... by lems1 · · Score: 1

    ... Cashing out

    --
    This sig can be distributed under the LGPL license
  141. Re:Great comment moderation, but room for improvem by whipslash · · Score: 1

    Great idea.

  142. Re:Possibly Good? by cwsumner · · Score: 1

    The old ones have awakened!

    The end is nigh!

    We're not old, you are just young! 8-)

  143. just want to say by gzuckier · · Score: 1

    I, for one, welcome our new BIZX, LLC overlords.

    --
    Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
  144. Re:More or less SourceForge malware? by Kobun · · Score: 1

    In all seriousness, what project is even left at SourceForge that you care about? FileZilla can DIAF.

  145. If it's there it's there - don't pretend otherwise by dbIII · · Score: 1
    Nasty little trick - demand people run around finding things for you that you have already seen and then when they find it, just ignore it. If it's there, it's there, no matter who wrote it.

    oppression-olympics regulars

    WTF?
    Looks like a comment about stuff that annoys me shook up some sort of ticking time bomb blaming the world for his problems. I suppose that explains the attack from nowhere and the refusal to admit that things were discussed to death in earlier articles.

    Now since you are big on ignoring comments you don't like and pretend they don't exist, how about ignoring any comments that reference those comments you don't like instead of trying to start some sort of fight? We would have avoided all this pointless idiocy and your goading to sift through all that slime again.

  146. UI annoyances ... by kbahey · · Score: 1

    Here are the UI annoyances I referred to in my previous reply to you (which is here).

    The links following the title is a bad idea. The site made its community used to all links being in the text of the story, but someone decided that a link should go in the title. See this screenshot, and look at where "(phoronix.com)" is? That is really annoying. Make it go back to where we are used to it (in the story text).

    In this screenshot the background color is dark when the mouse moves to the drop down list. That is distracting and obscures the choices. The background color should remain white with no change when the mouse is moved in, as in this screenshot.

  147. Another great idea for whipslash to pursue by GPS+Pilot · · Score: 1

    Great idea.

    Thanks, here's another great idea: allow Slashdot members to send private messages to each other.

    There are times when members want to continue a conversation with each other, while drifting into off-topic territory; or where one member wants to pick the brain of another and/or collaborate on Something Big; or where member A is so impressed with member B's posts, that A wants to offer employment to B.

    Currently, if you want to contact another Slashdot member, you use the kludge of replying to one of that member's comments. And of course there's no guarantee that member is even checking to see whether any replies are coming in. Furthermore there's no way to privately exchange phone numbers, etc.

    Slashdot is a collection of really big brains, who are unbelievably handicapped by the lack of a way to communicate with each other. Unleash the potential! By doing so, Slashdot would attract even more really big brains.

    (You many have noticed my really low user ID, 3683. Having observed things since the beginning, I know whereof I speak about the limitations that are holding Slashdot back.)

    --
    That that is is that that that that is not is not.
    1. Re:Another great idea for whipslash to pursue by whipslash · · Score: 1

      Good idea. Adding it to the list.

  148. More of the same is NOT enough by shanen · · Score: 1

    Upon reflection, I think I'm more than discouraged by your reply. "More of the same" is definitely not the answer for the ongoing problems... Actually, one part of your answer could be interpreted as "But even less so", which seems to be a tacit admission that things have been going in the wrong direction.

    (Of course, we already had the explicit evidence of the transfer of ownership itself. Not even sure it should be called a sale, since I've seen too many cases where such a deal was actually just a transfer of debt...)

    --
    Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
    1. Re:More of the same is NOT enough by whipslash · · Score: 1

      My point is we are going to improve features that users want improved, rather than hoist a whole new Slashdot on people that ruins the original spirit of Slashdot. We will be posting a story soon asking for user feedback to get it into a master list and then go from there.

    2. Re:More of the same is NOT enough by whipslash · · Score: 1

      Well hopefully the coming weeks and months and any changes we enact will work to encourage you rather than discourage you.

  149. Paying as I go and want to go? by shanen · · Score: 1

    Thanks for the clarification, but it makes me feel like I failed to make my suggestion sufficiently clear. Yes, I certainly think you should give priority to new features that users want, but I think you should give the highest priority to features they want badly enough to help pay for. My suggested mechanism to implement this approach would involve "charity shares" at a suggested 'retail' price of $10 per share. (However, one of the viral mechanisms that might be worth considering would be to allow overselling of shares (within the schedule constraints) to drive the per share cost down while pushing the priority up.)

    By making the linkage between new features (or ongoing costs) and the people who use those features (or incur the costs) more explicit, then you have a fundamentally different economic model. Rather than paying with our privacy in the usual push-driven advertising models, we would be rewarded by appearing on the donor page associated with the project documentation of the features we funded. Yeah, it's a small thing, but I think it would be enough for me to justify donating some of my money, small though my wallet be, and in a sense you can compare the smallness with the small value of a click on an ad...

    Of course the real question is whether or not there are a lot of people who might be similarly motivated by a convenient way to make slashdot better. I don't think you can judge by my poor salesmanship of the idea. How about if I offer to put up some seed money? (However, in that more substantial case I would want to see a pretty solid business plan... I'd need to believe there is some chance I'd recover my capital--but I am willing to gamble on the idea.)

    --
    Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
  150. Re:The WHO! by orasio · · Score: 1

    Slashdot probably has more uses for a marketing agency than trying to sell stuff to engineers.
    I would use primarily it as a research lab. You have a great community of dedicated people who will contribute valuable content.
    You can just let it live, gather valuable information, and play your experiments there. Do they contribute more when headlines are more sensationalist? Do they react to unfair moderation? How many ads will they put up with before complaining?
    Also... can this be used to leverage engineers as "influencers" ? I don't mean slashvertisements, I mean well planned manipulation.

  151. Re:The moderation system needs massive changes. by stdarg · · Score: 1

    Totally agree on downmods, even though I rarely use them.

    But is it true that unpopular opinions are downmodded? I see unpopular opinions sitting at +5 quite often.

  152. Re:The moderation system needs massive changes. by Shompol · · Score: 1

    That merely indicates that they are... popular. There is a smooth transition between "troll" and "i disagree" and there is no discrete distinction that can be easily made. I often read the comment "There is no "I disagree" moderation on Slashdot." Maybe adding "I disagree" down-mod can make things a little more explicit.