Slashdot Mirror


Despite Outrage From Users, Microsoft Continues To Install Bloatware Applications Onto Every Windows 10 PC (windowscentral.com)

Before Windows 10, a clean install of Windows only included the bare essentials a user would need to get started using their PC. With Windows 10, a clean install stays that way for about two minutes, because the second you hit the desktop, the Microsoft Store immediately starts trying to download third-party apps and games. Users have long complained about it, but it turns out Microsoft never put paid to it. Windows Central writes: And these apps keep trying to install themselves even after you cancel the downloads. There are six such apps, which is six too many. These apps are often random, but right now they include things like Candy Crush, Spotify, and Disney Magic Kingdoms. You should not see any of these apps on a fresh install of Windows 10, yet they are there every single time. There are policies you can set that disable these apps from automatically installing, but that's not the point. On a fresh, untouched, clean install of Windows 10, these apps will download themselves onto your PC. Even if you cancel the installation of these apps before they manage to complete the download, they will retry at a later date, without you even noticing. The only way I've found that gets rid of them permanently is to let them install initially, without canceling the download, and then uninstall the apps from the Start menu. If you cancel the initial download of the bloatware apps before they complete their first install, the Microsoft Store will just attempt to redownload them later and will keep doing so until that initial install is complete. This is not a good user experience, Microsoft.

257 of 490 comments (clear)

  1. What outrage? by Brett+Buck · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There's no real outrage - people still keep buying the accursed thing in massive numbers. If anyone was really outraged, they would get something else.

    1. Re:What outrage? by DogDude · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If anyone was really outraged, they would get something else.

      There is no practical alternative. But no, most people don't care, either.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    2. Re:What outrage? by sakono · · Score: 2

      There aren't really any alternatives for most people. I can't use linux if I want to be able to play most of my games as they are not supported on linux. I also have programs for work that will not work on linux and me and a coworker have been unable to modify it to work. Mac OS is a whole nother thing as it only installs on specific hardware configurations unlike windows and linux/unix so for many Windows is really the only OS they can use. which sucks. luckly I only mess with windows 10 at work. I still have windows 7 at home.

    3. Re:What outrage? by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If anyone was really outraged, they would get something else.

      Most are annoyed by Windows antics, not "outraged". Compatibility and familiarity trumps the alternatives so far.

      Macs are more expensive and don't run a lot of software titles, Google also pulls marketing shenanigans, Linux is unfamiliar and is hard to get help for unless you want to put up with impatient volunteers lacking people skills (I'm just the messenger).

      Until the alternatives improve, people will put up with a degree of MS spamware and forced upgrades. In the land of C-, you can stay D+ for a long time.

    4. Re:What outrage? by Doke · · Score: 1

      Schools and home use are switching heavily to Chromebooks. A large part of that is price, but some is to avoid Windows.

    5. Re:What outrage? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What alternative is there? Linux doesn't work for most people and it's pretty hard to buy a computer with it pre-installed and supported. Macs are expensive and MacOS has it's own issues.

      They put up with this shit because there isn't an alternative.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    6. Re:What outrage? by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      So run Linux and a copy of Windows 8.1 in a virtual machine.

    7. Re:What outrage? by DarkRookie · · Score: 1

      If you can even get them to play.
      I haven't found a way to even get them to play in a VM.

      --
      The millennial that doesn't like most of the stuff designed for millennials.
    8. Re:What outrage? by DarkRookie · · Score: 1

      Then you drink Googles Koolaid which is the same as MS but flavored red instead of purple.

      --
      The millennial that doesn't like most of the stuff designed for millennials.
    9. Re:What outrage? by blahplusplus · · Score: 1

      you'd have to be physically two blocks from their offices for your outrage to have any effect.

      Huh? Since when do purchase decisions have to be made 2 blocks from a company's office?

      You're not getting that before the internet existed they physically had to give you the entire software in order to get paid, you have no ability to influence their behavior via purchasing because they can always find a bunch of uninformed people to sustain themselves. The elite market participants can protect everyone else if there was some way to hold the company accountable (aka storming their offices). In reality since their customers are 100's of miles away, merely "not buying" from a company does not work. I'll give you an example from videogames...

      What does a 40 year old and a 15 year old have in common in terms of their awareness and buying habits? AKA nothing. If you're going to tell an informed audience that kids and their idiot parents are going to not buy games for their teens for christmas/birthday/whatever. I got a bridge I want to sell ya. Most people who are purchasing things have no idea how they work, they are not qualified to be market participants. The brain did not evolve to live in a free market society so you get these bad outcomes where corporate lawlesness gets accepted because of the ass backward nature of how the human mind is constructed. It's not in your interest to buy broken products or fraudulently made ones. But companies hire a bunch of scientists to manipulate people via advertising. The average person is not equipped to make sensible decisions in a high tech society.

    10. Re:What outrage? by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Because if you're smart you'll stop using Microsoft products completely, or at least minimize it as much as possible. Or do you want to live in a Microsoft-only world, where you don't even have control anymore of your own hardware? That's what they want, why make it easy for them? Get Linux and take back control.

    11. Re:What outrage? by squiggleslash · · Score: 4, Insightful

      it's pretty hard to buy a computer with it pre-installed and supported

      Define "Linux". The second most popular type of laptop computer right now are Chromebooks, which do everything most people need (and will cover a much greater percentage of those left's needs once Crostini is ready.) I've stopped recommending Windows machines to family members who have problems with computers. a Chromebook fits their requirements perfectly, with no risk of being bamboozed by calls from "Windows" about viruses on their computers.

      The scope of the environment Microsoft controls is reducing rapidly. Nerds can run Ubuntu (or I guess a Ubuntu fork, because Ubuntu isn't hipster compliant enough); people who need a computer to write emails, browse the web, and occasionally pay their taxes or write letters, are well served by Chromebooks. Macs have their creativity niche. Which leaves Windows as a gamers platform, for those gamers who want something a little more mod friendly than a console.

      Everyone has choices right now.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    12. Re:What outrage? by omnichad · · Score: 1

      People keep buying and using Windows, so they can't be that outraged

      I get outraged at bad drivers all the time. I still drive my car. There are no alternatives that work for me.

    13. Re:What outrage? by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

      Linux is unfamiliar and is hard to get help for unless you want to put up with impatient volunteers lacking people skills (I'm just the messenger).

      All of the major distributions offer paid commercial support. And there are independent businesses that also support Linux. It is only if you want free support that you need to talk with "impatient volunteers lacking people skills."

    14. Re:What outrage? by bluelip · · Score: 1

      That's why you play games on a console and not a computer which is used to accomplish things.

      --

      Yep, I never spell check.
      More incorrect spellings can be found he
    15. Re:What outrage? by green1 · · Score: 2

      There have been several very practical alternatives for decades now. It's not that people can't migrate, it's that they simply don't. Is it ignorance? is it simple momentum? I'm not sure, but there is really no good reason for anyone to use Windows anymore in 2018.

      I haven't owned a windows machine in 20 years, My wife (who is far from techie) hasn't owned one in 10. We haven't missed it in the slightest, and I haven't run in to anything that I couldn't do just as easily (or usually more easily) in Linux. And the more time goes on, the more stuff is cloud based anyway, which means that the vast majority of people could use ANYTHING that has a web browser in it to replace all of their day to day operations.

      And don't give me the "but there's this one person that has an extreme niche case that doesn't operate on anything but windows!" argument, we all know that this is nowhere near the majority of users.

    16. Re:What outrage? by green1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      To add to this, if you want free support for MS products you get... none. If you want paid support for MS products, you pay through the nose, and the only solution is "have you rebooted? yes? ok, have you used the system restore cd?"

      I have found linux support far better in that most times I can find actual answers on how to fix things, for free, and not the tired "reboot and system restore" that seems to be the bread and butter of "support" in the Windows world.

    17. Re:What outrage? by green1 · · Score: 2

      Linux would work for the vast majority of people if they'd only try it. It's only because MS shills such as yourself keep claiming otherwise that people don't try.

      Linux these days is far easier to use than Windows, has better support, and runs almost everything that you can think of. Sure there are a small handful of niche applications that maybe 0.00001% of the population actually use that don't work, but that's hardly "most people"

      There *IS* and alternative, people just have to quit being told it doesn't exist.

    18. Re: What outrage? by sakono · · Score: 1

      I work in printer/copiers. Don't have much of a choice in what applications I can use or OS. shit we had to modify the windows 7 version of the main software we use to get it to install on the windows 8 and windows 10 laptop we were given. the software people for the printers don't care. hell I can't update to newer browsers because they don't work with the old security practicals the printers use.

    19. Re:What outrage? by sakono · · Score: 1

      Yes I screwed up grammatically. congrats for pointing it out. It happens when I'm talking to someone and typing at the same time now and then. Didn't mean to get your panties in a twist. I'm only human, I make mistakes.

    20. Re:What outrage? by DogDude · · Score: 2

      All of our business software is Windows-only. We're in retail. There are no usable Linux alternatives.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    21. Re:What outrage? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      I like Chrome OS for what it is, basically a platform to run the Chrome browser on. But I couldn't use it for anything really serious, so I see it more like a mobile OS than a desktop/workstation.

      Businesses are not going to move to Chrome OS for example.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    22. Re:What outrage? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Ubuntu doesn't appear to even offer individual support. You have buy at least 50 PC's.

      I'm sure there are 3rd parties that have individual plans, but most consumers use word of mouth to judge such. It has to build up to a critical mass to be viable. The "network effect" matters in getting acceptance.

    23. Re:What outrage? by Aristos+Mazer · · Score: 1

      Linux has no marketing department. It isn't running ads to "put Linux under your Christmas tree" or anything like that. The only meaningful alternative to Windows is MacOS*, and a lot of people don't want to shell out the money for Apple or don't like Apple's walled garden. Linux isn't a commercial OS. It doesn't come preinstalled on computers that you typically find in the latest Amazon sale or on the floor at Best Buy. No one is pushing it into the consumer view. And if someone did get a Linux box somehow, I have no idea who they would call to help them turn it on or troubleshoot anything that went wrong with it. Linux effectively does not exist in the consumer sphere.

      * Maybe Chrome OS. I'd accept an argument for that.

    24. Re:What outrage? by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      There is no practical alternative. But no, most people don't care, either.

      They do care, but most seem to accept it as a fact of life that desktop computers will suck one way or another. As people rely more on phones and tablets, they too are becoming a source of headaches. "Why the [bleep] can't I transfer my photos from this mobile to gizmo to this other mobile gizmo?"

    25. Re:What outrage? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Correction: "...from this mobile gizmo to this other mobile gizmo"

    26. Re:What outrage? by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

      Ubuntu doesn't appear to even offer individual support. You have buy at least 50 PC's.

      Well that is new. I bought a single desktop support just last year. I am betting you could buy it if you called. I also bet it will return to the website if a lot of people call! :)

    27. Re:What outrage? by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1

      I get free Microsoft support pre-emptively calling me all the time when I have a virus. I just give them remote admin access to my PC and they fix it right up.

      --
      This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
    28. Re:What outrage? by goose-incarnated · · Score: 3, Insightful

      All of our business software is Windows-only. We're in retail. There are no usable Linux alternatives.

      And that's why you use Windows at home?

      --
      I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
    29. Re:What outrage? by chiefcrash · · Score: 1

      I find it interesting you declare that there's "no good reason for anyone to use Windows anymore", and then talk about "the majority of users" when confronted with the idea of a Windows-only niche...

      --
      Show me on the 1st Amendment bobblehead where the moderator touched you...
    30. Re:What outrage? by Brannon · · Score: 1

      The second most popular type of laptop computer right now are Chromebooks, which do everything most people need (and will cover a much greater percentage of those left's needs once Crostini is ready.)

      Apple says hello.

    31. Re:What outrage? by squiggleslash · · Score: 2

      There are two issues with that analysis:

      1. More and more applications are being delivered via the browser.
      2. It's not really that any more. Almost Chromebooks are capable of running native apps, there just aren't many right now. More than 90% of Chromebooks, and pretty much all new Chromebooks, can run Android applications. And, as I said, Crostini is being rolled out now, making the functionality of a Chromebook indistinguishable from that of any more traditional GNU/Linux system, except with really strong sandboxing.

      I would have no problem running a business from my Chromebook. My major reason for not using one as my primary system is that I'm a software developer, but that may change once Crostini becomes production ready. Being able to run Atom and/or Eclipse, with a native Outlook client, moderately good Microsoft file format options (Microsoft's own Office Online and Mobile Office work fine on it already), without having to deal with Windows 10's constant BS, will be awesome. It's already working better for certain applications than my Windows PC does.

      If they could release a version with Firefox instead of Chrome, it'd be perfect.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    32. Re:What outrage? by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Businesses are not going to move to Chrome OS for example.

      Why not? In most of the businesses i've seen, the typical user has fairly limited requirements that are satisfied easily by web based tools. Switching such users to chromebooks brings significant cost and security benefits.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    33. Re:What outrage? by novakyu · · Score: 1

      Wake me when Chromebooks can run AutoCAD and COMSOL.

    34. Re:What outrage? by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Why the fuck would I pay millions for bespoke development on Linux of a corporate accounting system, when I can just go out and buy one from Oracle?
      Or a corporate expense system?
      A workflow engine?
      An inventory management system?
      A POS system?
      A software asset management system?
      A process automation engine?
      A payroll system?
      A sales tax system?
      A corporate intranet with attached content management system?
      An integrated comms system, that includes messaging, desktop sharing, email and voice comms?
      A corporate tax system?
      A project portfolio management system?
      A market trading system?
      A payroll tax system?
      A contact management system?
      A marketing platform?
      A sales lead management system?
      A customer service system?
      An IT ticketing system?
      A facilities management system?

      I could go on, but hopefully you get the point already.

      I'm also very aware that non-Windows options exist for all of those. But why the fuck would I cripple my business by constraining my options like that?

    35. Re:What outrage? by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Maybe for most people the car is adequate and they lack the time or energy to build the fucking tank and keep it running.

      But please, what exactly is the alternative to Lightroom that gives me catalogue management, the ability to process 2000 photos in a couple of hours, integration to my hosting site?

      Which other OS will run all 808 games I have on Steam, let alone the ones I own that aren't on that platform?

      Can you ask my camera manufacturer to supply their software for Linux, because they don't perceive this to be a viable market for them?

      You're bitching that I accept an OS I'm not terribly happy with but ignoring one of the things that matters the most: I can get whatever fucking software I want or need to run on it.

      There are 2-3 applications that run on whatever the fuck Apple call their OS these days that it would be nice to have access to, but buying from Apple is like buying from Microsoft while stabbing yourself in the testicles. No.

      There are no applications that run on Linux that I can't also run on Windows that I actually want to run. Sure, there's plenty of server-side shit but - get this - I run that on a Linux server and not on my desktop PC.

      We continue to preach the gospel of GNU and Linux.

      The rest of us skip the religion and get on with our lives.

    36. Re: What outrage? by Cederic · · Score: 1

      This is bullshit. He explicitly mentioned games and you think there are alternatives?

      Following your logic we may as well close all libraries and book stores. There's a linux manual, that should be enough book for everybody.

      Following your logic we may as well close all cinemas and shut down hollywood. Fritz Lang made Metropolis, nobody else needs any other film.

      Following your logic would be fucking stupid. I hope you don't work on anything related to IT.

    37. Re:What outrage? by Cederic · · Score: 1

      That's why you play games on a console

      Consoles don't run many of the games I enjoy playing.

      How many of the Zachtronics catalogue are available on consoles?
      Is Zero-K available on consoles?
      When were the Car Mechanic Simulator series ported to consoles?
      Has one of the largest selling games franchises in history, Football Manager, ever been on console? (Actually, yes - but not the full version)

      a computer which is used to accomplish things

      I use my computer to accomplish my objectives of making it through another day without killing everybody around me. Its ability to distract and entertain me helps tremendously with this; I can watch films, listen to music, read books, access the internet and play games. It's very versatile.

      Of course, I can also write books, write games and edit photographs on it, and post them to the internet.

      Given such flexibility, why would I spend more money on a console that I don't need?

    38. Re:What outrage? by Cederic · · Score: 1

      people will put up with a degree of MS spamware

      Buy PC with Windows 10 on it. Three hours later it's configured how I want it.

      MS spamware subsequently encountered: Umm. Oh, I think I remember having to uninstall something added by an update a few months ago. One thing.

      If people are getting spammed by MS then it means they don't know how to use a computer well enough to use Linux anyway.

    39. Re:What outrage? by Daralantan · · Score: 1

      I like Chrome OS for what it is, basically a platform to run the Chrome browser on. But I couldn't use it for anything really serious, so I see it more like a mobile OS than a desktop/workstation.

      Ignoring his second post here, I took the original post to mostly mean for regular everyday people. I assumed the qualifier was "family members who aren't good with computers." And it quickly makes me realize that this would likely best apply to my Mom, who was thinking of getting a new cheap computer soon-ish.

      Thinking about it, I almost feel like I should just recommend her one because she only uses her home PC for rare youtube, email, and... I guess printing email? That, plus she keeps installing a 10-15 year old copy of Office from one of my aunts on every computer and uses it for almost nothing. Would simply need to get her to try Google Docs for the rare notes she might type.

      The only issue I can think of is that she definitely prefers using a desktop to using a laptop.

    40. Re:What outrage? by sremick · · Score: 1

      it's pretty hard to buy a computer with it pre-installed and supported.

      I know, so incredibly hard. It's unfortunate that Dell is such a tiny company that no one has heard of.

      Dell will happily sell you a Latitude laptop with Ubuntu installed, and it knocks like $100 off the cost. The Precision workstations are available with Red Hat. All you have to do is ask. And the Latitudes (and Precision Mobile) laptops are the only ones you should be looking at from them anyway... the Inspirons are junk, and avoid the Latitude 3000 series as that's basically just an Inspiron now too.

    41. Re:What outrage? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Sure, if you go out of your way or dig around, you may get such. But the fact you have to go out of your way emphasizes my point.

    42. Re:What outrage? by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      Sure there are a small handful of niche applications that maybe 0.00001% of the population actually use that don't work, but that's hardly "most people"

      Yes, because only 0.00001% of the population plays games on their computers. And only 0.00001% of the population runs Microsoft Office. As bad as it is, people know Office and are used to it, and most don't want to learn something else. And only 0.00001% of the population run apps like Photoshop and other Adobe software.

      I agree with you, there are alternatives, but to the average non-technical user, they usually aren't feasible.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    43. Re:What outrage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Here is the alternative that I chose. My PC at home is running Win7 and it will continue to run Win7 until it breaks or MS stops supporting security updates to it.

      In the meantime, I am getting very comfortable running Ubuntu Linux and LibreOffice. The trend I see is that both Linux and LibreOffice have made great strides to be full featured and easy to use. At the same time, Office have bloated to ridiculous levels and the Windows philosophy has changed to to believe that everyone in the world is too stupid to manage and control their own computer and that Microsoft always knows best. Oh, and they can push some crapware to everyone's computer and make a few extra bucks, then that's what they will do.

      I am betting on the fact that when the time comes for me to end of life my Win7 computer, Linux will have improved even more and that Microsoft's products will become more full of ads and more expensive as they move to subscription based licensing model. While I still find my Win7 computer to be useful, I am absolutely certain that it will be my last personal computer running Windows.

    44. Re:What outrage? by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      I would have no problem running a business from my Chromebook. My major reason for not using one as my primary system is that I'm a software developer [and I need] to run Atom and/or Eclipse, with a native Outlook client, moderately good Microsoft file format options (Microsoft's own Office Online and Mobile Office work fine on it already) [and] If they could release a version with Firefox instead of Chrome, it'd be perfect.

      So, except for the lack of ability to develop software, communicate with clients using the file formats they expect, and use your preferred browser, there's nothing from stopping you from running your software development business from a Chromebook. Which leaves business tasks you can perform as... webmail to clients and looking up documentation on the internet. Whoa, that's a powerhouse.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
  2. solution? by e432776 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is a frustrating aspect of win10: lack of control over what programs are installed on your machine. I don't primarily use win10, but for machines I have set up I think I solved the problem by disabling automatic updates in the Windows Store. Of course, this means updates are..disabled. Perhaps others have a better way to handle this?

    In any case, disrespectful behavior by Microsoft.

    1. Re:solution? by MeNeXT · · Score: 1

      What you are advocating is apathy. It always solves the problems.

      --
      DRM? No thanks, I'll just get it somewhere else...
    2. Re:solution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I pirated an Enterprise copy because it's the only way I was able to figure out disabling all the crap I don't want. I own a copy of Windows 10 Pro, and I still need to pirate Windows just to disable to crap it comes with. I would buy Enterprise, but they won't sell me a single copy for home use, so instead I will never pay for Windows again. I think it's a win-win, because if Microsoft actually wanted me to buy Windows 10 they would make available a version that isn't bogged down with shit, so clearly this is the result they're aiming for.

    3. Re:solution? by swilver · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Yes, put Win10 behind a firewall + proxy. Then only give the applications that need internet access the address/pw of the proxy and donot set the proxy of Windows itself. For Chrome you'll need FoxyProxy to set one without using the system settings.

      You may also need software like Proxifier to have other application go through your proxy.

      Net effect: Nothing has internet unless you allow it, resulting in a much more relaxing experience (apps donot download updates, and generally just donot do stuff behind your back without your knowledge). Windows cannot updates its tiles, nor download software, nor update itself. It's quite peaceful.

    4. Re:solution? by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1

      You can do the same thing with Windows Firewall, only allow chrome.exe access to the default gateway for example.

      --
      This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
    5. Re:solution? by technosaurus · · Score: 1

      Or deny svchost.exe access to the network.

    6. Re:solution? by dwywit · · Score: 1

      Don't forget "updateorchestrator.exe" and
        "windows10updaterapp.exe" (or whatever they're called this week).

      What burns me up is that the windows 10 update/feature upgrade process is allowed to spawn so many tcp connections to download files that it will saturate a domestic internet connection. The resource monitor shows you exactly how many tcp connections, ports in use, remote IP, etc. So I've tried setting maxnumtcpconnections to 10 in the registry - that key actually disappeared after it was ignored and the 1803 feature update completed.

      Then there's powershell and NetQosPolicy - tried limiting http/80 and https/443 traffic - ignored. Tried limiting "windows10updaterapp.exe" - also ignored.

      I've got 16 Lenovo laptops (Celerons!!!! with W10 Home!!!!!!) in a small school to maintain until the board can afford to upgrade to i5 models with W10 Pro, and a Windows server running WSUS. I'm going to screw Windows 10 down so tight it'll need CPR. Until then I use a powershell script to remove the bloat and control as much of the update process as I can.

      --
      They sentenced me to twenty years of boredom
  3. Well... by dyslexicbunny · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They probably paid Microsoft more for access than you did for your operating system. Enjoy being captive to this new customer experience!

    1. Re:Well... by Errol+backfiring · · Score: 2

      Welcome to the modern law of supply and demand. The suppliers have become the customers of other corporations, and the people who pay and think they are the customers (people buy Windows 10 as part of a new computer) have nothing to say anymore.

      --
      Nae king! Nae laird! Nae yurrupiean pressedent! We willna be fooled again!
    2. Re:Well... by TheCastro1689 · · Score: 1

      Cable should be free, let the ads and networks pay for my views!

    3. Re:Well... by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

      Welcome to the modern law of supply and demand. The suppliers have become the customers of other corporations, and the people who pay and think they are the customers (people buy Windows 10 as part of a new computer) have nothing to say anymore.

      Could go either way.

      One could argue that the OS is a component of the PC, so of course the PC manufacturer is the customer.

      Or, one could argue that the PC manufacturer is a reseller of the OS.

  4. Is 2019 to be the year of Linux on the desktop? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Probably not, but we are investing heavily in creating custom scripts to remove all of this crap which we'll have to re-run after every feature update.

    "Enterprise" edition my ass.

    1. Re:Is 2019 to be the year of Linux on the desktop? by Shikaku · · Score: 1

      Systemd is easily avoidable. http://without-systemd.org/wik...

  5. Re:But whatabout Google? by willaien · · Score: 1

    The difference is that Microsoft actually installs some of these applications, like Candy Crush.

  6. Re:Malware installs bloatware... by sconeu · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Because some of our clients have specialized equipment with interface software that only runs on Windows?

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  7. At least they're windows store apps. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You didn't ask for them, they take up bandwidth (Though presumably the windows store won't download or update apps without asking if you're on a meterd connection - But good luck trying to tell windows you're metered before the first login lol), they take up storage space, they put their dumb icons right on your start menu..

    You could call them bloatware, but they're not quite as bad as the old pre-load bloatware of the XP and Vista bad-old-days.

    They're windows store apps, so they live in that safe little user mode jail. No crap left around in your system folders, half-registered DLLS or shell extensions dangling int the breeze filling event logs with errors every few seconds. They're not even as bad as phone bloat, which can make unwanted apps part of the system image and non-removable.

    It is pretty dumb that they auto-download without asking. Microsoft has a lot of other problems to fix with their really bad store first. (Pretty much any non-trival large application is a nightmare to deal with because installs and updates can fail silently.)

    1. Re:At least they're windows store apps. by dwywit · · Score: 1

      You can pre-empt windows doing anything internet-related by not giving it an internet connection until you've set everything the way you want it - at least, whatever Windows will allow you to do.

      On most retail machines, Windows will install and configure itself on first power up. It'll search for network connections as part of that, but it will get to a usable state without. Don't plug in an ethernet cable, and don't give it access to any wi-fi (turn it off in the BIOS or use the hard switch/keyboard combo if you have open SSIDs in range).

      Don't give it any network access until you've done what you can to restrict it.

      --
      They sentenced me to twenty years of boredom
    2. Re:At least they're windows store apps. by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      "keep network services running but hide them behind a firewall so they cant be used" is pretty stupid, surely simply turning those services off by default so that even without a firewall there are no exploitable services to connect to would have been a better idea?

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
  8. In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Water still wet, fire still bad, small green creatures from Alpha Centauri still small green creatures from Alpha Centauri.

  9. they also mess-up sysprep as well. by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    they also mess-up sysprep as well.

    1. Re:they also mess-up sysprep as well. by DarkRookie · · Score: 1

      They don't want you to use that any longer. I run into this a lot.
      They want you deploy it.

      --
      The millennial that doesn't like most of the stuff designed for millennials.
  10. Decrapifier PowerScript by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I have been using the PowerScript decrapifier by csand on new installs, and it is amazing.
    A word of caution: Run the script while the computer is unplugged from the Internet. Otherwise, Store tries to install while the script tries to uninstall and may miss something.

  11. Meanwhile... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I just finished setting up a nice i7 32gig ram nvidia 1050ti gaming rig under Linux Mint 19. Steam downloaded all the games and with the new Proton thing I'm getting Windows titles as well for some things. Keep on truck'n Microsoft... I'm not impacted by the downloads and if other people want your OS that's their problem.

  12. bare essentials by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

    Before Windows 10, a clean install of Windows only included the bare essentials a user would need to get started using their PC.

    Like a media player with a music video.

    And solitaire.

    1. Re:bare essentials by DarkRookie · · Score: 1

      No thanks if they are the Win 10 versions of those
      Media Player is still garbage and now the Solitaire game comes with ads, doesn't auto complete, and doesn't do a cool thing when you when a hand.

      --
      The millennial that doesn't like most of the stuff designed for millennials.
    2. Re:bare essentials by Blue23 · · Score: 1

      Listen up, back in NT days Minesweeper /was/ essential.

      --
      LITTLE GIRL: But which cookie will you eat FIRST? C. MONSTER: Me think you have misconception of cookie-eating process.
  13. Re:Malware installs bloatware... by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't understand tech people that still uses crap like Windoze...

    I don't understand humans that still use air from the atmosphere to breathe.
    I don't understand rail commuters that still board trains.
    I don't understand grass seed companies that still use fescue seeds.

    Windows is the most common platform out there- of course a large number of tech workers are still going to be using it.

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  14. We need the Geek's Rebellion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    And come together to force Microsoft to release a non shit version of Windows 10. We know we can't fight Microsoft in court (we tried before). We need drastic action. I say we release a virus that mass installs Linux on computers and tell them that Microsoft upgraded them to Linux because Windows is shit.

    1. Re:We need the Geek's Rebellion by sqorbit · · Score: 2

      Until there is an affordable and viable alternative any amount of outrage, scream, yelling or rebellion won't effect Microsoft at all. Linux is not a viable alternative. I say that writing from a Linux based machine and all my home PCs are now running Linux. Apple is not an affordable alternative. There's no clear threat to Microsoft so there's no reason to worry about a rebellion.

      --
      Sent from my TARDIS
  15. What are they gonna do? by dnaumov · · Score: 1

    Switch to Linux? Ha-ha.

  16. Re: Malware installs bloatware... by Sique · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It might be shitty bloatware, but there are no alternatives (other than those also running on Windows), and the complexity of the problem does not allow for an inhouse re-development, as there are not enough installs to rectify the cost.

    --
    .sig: Sique *sigh*
  17. Newflash.. by sqorbit · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Microsoft doesn't care what users think. Anyone who is surprised at this is just being silly. Microsoft has shown no desire to actually cater to users. Edge is quite possibly the most horrible web browser ever produced and they force it upon users. Windows 8 interface was a total failure, yet they still crammed it into the Windows 10 menu. These are only some examples. Microsoft has no motivation to actually make positive changes for end users.

    --
    Sent from my TARDIS
    1. Re:Newflash.. by DarkRookie · · Score: 1

      Edge is better than IE11.
      Its still effectively IE12, but it is a better browser than the ones before it.

      --
      The millennial that doesn't like most of the stuff designed for millennials.
    2. Re:Newflash.. by Solandri · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Microsoft doesn't care what users think. Anyone who is surprised at this is just being silly. Microsoft has shown no desire to actually cater to users.

      You are not the customer. You are the product. Your usage info and access to your computer (to force-install programs) is being sold to the actual customers - companies wanting marketing info and to sell you things.

      The difference is Facebook and Google have to give their product away for free to get people to agree to be the product. Microsoft somehow still manages to get people to pay for the "privilege" of becoming the product.

    3. Re:Newflash.. by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1

      Well, correction, they do cater to, and care about, users who aren't the small minority who complain on /.

      --
      This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
  18. Outrage: Solitaire requires internet access! by modi123 · · Score: 2

    What the article fails to properly address is the massive outrage that Solitaire now *REQUIRES* internet access. No more plinking away at quick hands when the network is recycling, or a PC is being scanned. Ugh.

  19. Not my experience by mcvos · · Score: 2

    While this would be absolutely inexcusable behaviour for an OS, it doesn't match my experience with Windows 10. I haven't seen any unusual apps show up. My system looks remarkably clean. Almost suspiciously so...

    1. Re:Not my experience by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      This is controlled by a few settings and from what I gather there may also be a regional case to it. For one, turning off "suggested apps" typically kills all of these shenanigans along with many others (I never saw a popup over the Chrome icon declaring the awesomeness of Edge either).

  20. Easy fix: LTSB/LTSC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Easy fix for this. Windows 10 LTSB/LTSC.

  21. Re:Anyone else read "bloat" ware by rickb928 · · Score: 1, Funny

    No.

    Substantially normal people do not, in fact, see 'Trump' in everything.

    Just the trolls, the disaffected Leftists, and of course you, who clearly forgot to post Anonymous.

    --
    deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
  22. Don't understand the issue at all... by Excelcia · · Score: 2

    I honestly don't understand the issue at all. While the automatic Windows updates were a big problem for me, a problem which resurfaced a few times, I have never had an issue with the app store. I do not even have a Microsoft app store login. My Windows 10 has never tried to automatically install any apps.

    Since buying this laptop a year and a half ago, I've done two Windows upgrades on it. Both times Cortana, Edge, and a few other built-in bits that are hard to remove showed back up, requiring install_wim_tweak to remove. But no app store programs have ever appeared.

    Windows Update, though, was a huge problem for me. Microsoft doesn't get free reign to put updates on my computer, I vet each one and apply them. Microsoft has been pushing hard, especially with its last two "upgrades" to prevent people from disabling automatic updates. And I mean they have gone to heroics. Two "protected" windows services which have no other real duty except to look out for if the Windows Update service is disabled and undisable it. Also a whole host of task scheduler settings are doing the same thing. For those wanting control of Windows Update back, I highly recommend Windows Update Blocker in concert with Windows Update Mini Tool. There are several forum threads that speak toward how to do this relatively easily.

    1. Re:Don't understand the issue at all... by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      Ditto. I don't see this crap as bloatware that demands a response. If my PC gets low on disk space I just groom. Lots of other stuff is easier to identify and remove.

      If it's eating cycles, I can see that pretty quickly and deal with it. Users who are unable to do so are often unable to discern performance problems.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    2. Re:Don't understand the issue at all... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No. People are complaining that in addition to making updates harder to disable (which is good) MSFT is also pushing junk with updates (which is bad).

    3. Re:Don't understand the issue at all... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Decades of "hurr durr windoze has weak security" as a result of everybody turning off windows updates is what led us to this.

      No, Windows having weak security is exclusively a result of Microsoft's failure to provide security. Windows update is nothing more than a pressure valve to moderate cost to Microsoft and end user's of Microsoft's ongoing failure to provide a secure product.

      Everybody complained that windows had bad security practices, so microsoft improved them, and now everybody complains about -that-.

      Any assertion forced updates are for security must logically admit the reason for update is a total failure of Microsoft to provide that security in the first place.

      What people are complaining about is forced conscription into perpetual beta programs that interfere with productivity when what they expect and demand is an operating system suitable for production use.

    4. Re:Don't understand the issue at all... by Calydor · · Score: 2

      Do you consider Windows forcing the installation of un-vetted and non-native programs as part of its update process to be GOOD security?

      Holy crap, where's your bar for when something is bad security?

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    5. Re:Don't understand the issue at all... by Excelcia · · Score: 1

      Everybody complained that windows had bad security practices, so microsoft improved them, and now everybody complains about -that-.

      I don't have any problem with Windows updates. I do have a problem when they are all mandatory. I don't even have a problem with Microsoft making Windows updates automatic by default. I have a significant problem with not being able to turn them off, and an even bigger problem when Microsoft makes significant efforts to force updates on those who have clearly disabled the automation.

      I can't tell you how many problems I have circumvented by vetting each update that goes on my computer. Driver issues, mutually incompatible updates, DirectX problems, and most especially the large number of updates that don't play well with pre-boot authentication systems and/or pre-boot drivers required for RAID systems. Windows used to play very well with pre-boot drivers, but lately it has been getting worse and worse as Microsoft makes concerted efforts to not play nicely with systems like VeraCrypt. I also avoided the entire Windows 8 -> Windows 10 upgrade fiasco, where people were treated a series of increasingly invasive notices that they "can" upgrade, that progressed to "should" then "shall" and were essentially forced to, or where it happened silently at night and untold data was lost. Microsoft is still getting dinged for that little gem. Most recently it's been the incomplete, wrong, and competing updates to provide meltdown/spectre "patches". Poorly tested fixes which caused problems with hosts of drivers and caused performance issues for millions of people needlessly, since the early versions didn't actually fix the problem. I'm all for rapid deployment of a fix, but it should actually be a "fix" and should be tested. The meltdown/spectre fiasco has been a lesson on what not to do.

      The thing is, no one can say "hey, don't apply KB123blahblah, it causes a freeze on computers with _______ hardware" any more, because normal people can't stop it. So instead of a dozen or a hundred computers getting bricked and having to restore from recovery partitions with the resulting loss of data, it's thousands with each bad patch.

      So don't talk about this being Microsoft's "improved" security. It is not improved security. It is improved control.

      And for anyone with the time and knowledge to do it properly, I still highly recommend taking control back of Windows update and making sure each patch that gets applied is well tested before using on your own computer.

    6. Re:Don't understand the issue at all... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Yep, never a good idea to create a Microsoft Account. Without an account you can't download free applications, so I would assume that no account means that it won't automatically download free applications. Without an account you can't even run some pre-installed applications (Mail) presumably because then they can't track you as easily.

    7. Re:Don't understand the issue at all... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Did you completely miss the period of time in which Windows was actively downloading advertisements and upgrading users computers to Windows 10 without permission?

      Turning off general and important updates is a standard practice for many even though they keep security updates on. Anyone who treats updates as all-or-nothing needs to get more education. When Microsoft stooped to supplying advertisements in its "security" updates was the last straw for many,

    8. Re:Don't understand the issue at all... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      I will trust Microsoft once they prove themselves to be trustworthy. So far I'm still waiting.

  23. Increasingly common by Jon+Peterson · · Score: 1

    It's annoying but it's been a growing trend for a long time. Android phone makers are far worse in shipping unremovable random software. I remember years ago being infuriated that Linux distributions started shipping huge amounts of software as compulsory installed components (and even more as default options), while OSes like Solaris would still default to a minimal base install.

    Having a system assume you want Python installed is less annoying than one assuming you want Candy Crush installed, but only marginally.

    Anyway, it's an unstoppable trend.

    --
    ----- .sig: file not found
  24. No historical perspective by jdavidb · · Score: 2

    Before Windows 10, a clean install of Windows only included the bare essentials a user would need to get started using their PC

    Really? There wasn't a huge lawsuit about this?

    1. Re:No historical perspective by GuB-42 · · Score: 1

      If you are thinking about IE, that's not bloatware, it is an essential piece of software. Even if you didn't use it as your default browser, you probably used it at least once to download your favorite alternative browser.

      The point of lawsuit is that a web browser is so essential that not letting user choose is anti-competitive.

    2. Re: No historical perspective by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      Also the point of the 90s lawsuit wasn't that MS included IE but some of the tactics it did to prevent Netscape from getting installed. Like bribing/threatening OEMs not to install Netscape or their prices would go up.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    3. Re:No historical perspective by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Really? There wasn't a huge lawsuit about this?

      No there was not. There was a lawsuit about a specific anti-competitive behaviour targeted at a specific company's product through bundling. But that ultimately has zero to do with what is going on here.

  25. Re:First sentence by rickb928 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Wait, USB drivers were not bloatware. They just didn't work.

    There's a difference.

    --
    deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
  26. The alternatives. by Xnet+Project · · Score: 1

    As of late, there have been alternatives for users to move to another operating system within the past 2 years now. The concern is this could potentially force consumers hands into make a decision sooner rather than later.

  27. I do it old school by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I play solitaire on my Windows laptop. No internet required.

    A 17” laptop makes a nice card table once you close the lid, but you need to use small cards.

    1. Re:I do it old school by omnichad · · Score: 1

      The other option is to play games on your desktop while your laptop is at work. This requires a somewhat larger desk.

  28. Even on Pro by Yggdrasil42 · · Score: 5, Informative

    The even more ridiculous thing is that this happens even on the Pro version. The one that's supposed to be for doing work. And those "policies you can set that disable these apps from automatically installing"? Yeah, they don't work anymore. As a result every employee gets Candy Crush and the like installed on every machine. Absolutely insane.

    1. Re:Even on Pro by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      I just built a new gaming PC this last weekend and installed Windows 10 Pro. It's exactly what you described. When I checked the Start Menu for the first time, I saw that Candy Crush, a hidden object game, the Dolby Experience, and a variety of other bloatware was already installed. On a brand new, fresh install of Pro.

      Ridiculous.

      And that's not even considering all of the other bad behavior the OS engages in by default. I went through every single control panel to enable every privacy-focused setting I could find, but after two days I'm still discovering new toggles that need switching off as I stumble upon hidden panes that are linked from control panels that I had thought I'd already covered in detail. Not to mention that disabling the telemetry collection seems to be virtually impossible.

      Given that the last time I tried using Windows 10 it blue screened on me twice within the first 30 minutes (granted, it was the first week after its release and I was running it in a VM, but still...), I don't exactly have a stellar opinion of the system, though at least you can hide Cortana from the taskbar now, so that's something, I guess?

    2. Re:Even on Pro by dwywit · · Score: 1

      Hit up Task Scheduler - you can turn off the uploads, although you can't really stop the collection.

      As a matter of interest, where does windows store the telemetry data while it awaits upload? Perhaps the data storage can be nuked periodically, before it attempts to upload.

      --
      They sentenced me to twenty years of boredom
    3. Re:Even on Pro by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      As a result every employee gets Candy Crush and the like installed on every machine.

      Which idiot system admin let company machines out the door with the "Suggested Apps" setting enabled in Windows?

    4. Re:Even on Pro by Yggdrasil42 · · Score: 1

      Thanks for your insightful comment. Of course we disable those. These apps are not part of Suggested Apps (those only cover suggestions appearing in your Start Menu). They're instead part of the "Microsoft Consumer Experience", which can only be disabled in Windows 10 Enterprise (or Education), not in Pro.

      Apparently MS believes Pro users to be quite different from Enterprise users. There used to be other ways to disable the installation of this crap, but MS has removed these over time. I welcome any solutions that actually work.

    5. Re:Even on Pro by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      These apps are not part of Suggested Apps (those only cover suggestions appearing in your Start Menu).

      Source? Because there are plenty of articles on the net saying they are, and I can only confirm that I don't have any of those apps on any Widnows 10 machines except briefly on the one where that one setting was disabled. After enabling that setting none of the listed apps appeared again.

  29. Re:Malware installs bloatware... by sentiblue · · Score: 1

    Lots/most of times it's not for employees to say. The company endorses hardware/os/software for their people to use. You just shutup and use it if you wanna work for them. Period!

  30. The document you're looking for is... by Jadecristal · · Score: 2

    Yes, Windows 10 is a [...redacted...].

    The document you're looking for is here, if you're stuck with it:

    https://docs.microsoft.com/en-...

  31. Network effects by sjbe · · Score: 1

    I don't understand tech people that still uses crap like Windoze...

    Then study up on network effects.

    1. Re:Network effects by Xnet+Project · · Score: 1

      I don't understand tech people that still uses crap like Windoze...

      Our excuse would be for gaming. Not every PC game can play on Linux (PlayOnLinux, WINE, DXVK, etc..) at least not yet.

  32. Re:This a a Wonderful Feature by phishybongwaters · · Score: 1

    I for one do not expect or want to see fucking candycrush or minecraft on a clean install of an enterprise grade OS. So please explain to us mouth breathers how preinstalled fucking shit games is helping or guiding you? Fucking obvious troll is obvious

  33. Umm, I don't see it by holophrastic · · Score: 1

    I'm running win 10. I don't see any such thing.

  34. Re: Malware installs bloatware... by saloomy · · Score: 1

    The real issue is that Microsoft doesn't see these things as bloatware for the Windows 10 intended audience. If you want a professional or enterprise OS, buy Windows 10 Enterprise. You will find that all the Microsoft crap is gone. Of course, it costs more, but has more support and capabilities (like VPN just works). If you run around buying home and SOHO versions, its intended for highschoolers who use candy crush and spotify.

  35. Windows has always included games by default by eggstasy · · Score: 1

    Millions of people enjoyed playing the default solitaire under Windows 3.1, why would you complain about games in the default install?

    1. Re:Windows has always included games by default by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 2

      They used to preinstall games.

      Now they preinstall conduits for monetization.

  36. Re: Malware installs bloatware... by tepples · · Score: 2

    What edition does Microsoft expect a small local business with about a dozen PCs to buy?

  37. Re:Malware installs bloatware... by tepples · · Score: 1

    Do you expect the majority of desktop and laptop users in small and medium businesses to give up their desktop or laptop PC in favor of a mobile device connected to a cloud system backend? I didn't think so.

  38. No alternatives by sjbe · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If anyone was really outraged, they would get something else.

    That implies that there is something else for them to get. There really isn't. Microsoft was convicted in court of having a monopoly. Do you know what that word means? It means there aren't other options on the PC. The only other options are linux which perpetually lags Windows on the PC desktop in application options and the OS X which is both pricey and ties you to Apple. Both linux and OS X are fine options for some but as much as it irritates me to say it, Windows is the best offering available for a lot of people and companies. A lot of software people want is only available on Windows. If the people around you use Windows chances are high you will too. If you play games on your PC it's a virtual certainty are you are running Windows to do it.

    1. Re:No alternatives by ItsJustAPseudonym · · Score: 1

      If you play games on your PC it's a virtual certainty are you are running Windows to do it.

      This.

    2. Re:No alternatives by geek · · Score: 1

      Microsoft was convicted in court of having a monopoly. Do you know what that word means? It means there aren't other options on the PC.

      Maybe YOU should learn what it means. You aren't "convicted" of having a monopoly. Its not a crime to be a monopoly. Abusing it is but you can be a monopoly all day long. 30 years and you people still haven't learned a thing about that case.

  39. Internet overages by tepples · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Grooming" will not recover the $10 per GB that your satellite or fixed-wireless ISP bills you for having downloaded the apps in the first place.

    1. Re:Internet overages by tepples · · Score: 1

      life is pay to play and you're the one in the boondocks.

      And that's the fault of city zoning boards that threaten residents for just growing a victory garden. In addition, who can serve residents of the boondocks other than a business in the boondocks?

    2. Re:Internet overages by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      "Grooming" will not recover the $10 per GB that your satellite or fixed-wireless ISP bills you for having downloaded the apps in the first place.

      Setting your connection to metered will prevent the Windows Store from downloading apps just fine. Maybe users should use the settings they have available to them?

      Full Disclosure: I have never seen these 3rd party apps on my Windows systems. Either I'm very lucky or doing something righter than those numnuts at Windows Central.

  40. New Account by shaksys · · Score: 1

    It happens when a new user account is created too, after already removing it from the primary user account.

  41. Users are still confused in the 21st Century. by geekmux · · Score: 1

    Dear Microsoft User,

    Understand one thing.

    You are the consumer, NOT the customer.

    In short, Fuck You Very Much, and Have a Nice Day.

    - Microsoft

    1. Re:Users are still confused in the 21st Century. by geekmux · · Score: 1

      If you don't think EVERY SINGLE company is doing exactly the same thing, you're pretty delusional.

      I mean, Shazam's entire business model was to snoop on what people were listening to, and now another company has it.

      Also, are you guys seriously getting worked up about having two games preinstalled? Why didn't you complain about Minesweeper and Solitaire that have been included in Windows since 3.1?

      Minesweeper doesn't download a bloatware update every other month. Or run a background update service. Or update and reboot your system without asking you. Or require you to create an account online, and log in to the Minesweeper servers to obtain a license. Or attempt to re-install itself without asking.

      All of this other stupid shit does. BIG difference when it comes to just about everything that matters in a corporate environment. On top of all of that, when I configure the OS to uninstall (or not install) Minesweeper, it fucking does it. That is NOT how this shitware is acting.

      TL; DR - If Minesweeper was pulling this same crap with updates and re-installs, it would be on the shitware list too. It's as benign as a pet rock by comparison.

  42. With Windows 10, you no longer own your computer by lophophore · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Once you install Windows 10, you no longer own your computer. Microsoft can install what ever they want on it, and reboot it when ever they want. That also gives them the ability to remove anything they want from your computer.

    --
    there are 3 kinds of people:
    * those who can count
    * those who can't
  43. Meanwhile in a saner world.. by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

    Meanwhile, in a saner world, I'm getting the kinks worked out of using Ubuntu 18.04 with a Virtualbox install of Windows 8 (to support the whole TWO Windows-only apps I need to keep using), and IDGAF about Windows 10 -- and never will. Why aren't you doing the same?

    1. Re:Meanwhile in a saner world.. by omnichad · · Score: 1

      IDGAF about Windows 10 -- and never will. Why aren't you doing the same?

      Because even with the extra bloat, Windows 10 performs better than Windows 8 - almost as much of an improvement as 7 was over Vista.

  44. How much does Windows 10 Enterprise cost? by tepples · · Score: 3, Informative

    Nonsense, either get an Enterprise license

    How many PCs does a company need before it qualifies to buy Windows 10 Enterprise licenses? And how much does it cost per seat? In my experience, "Request a Quote" as stated in Microsoft's comparison page means "if you have to ask, you can't afford it." The "Learn More & Try" link ultimately links to an ROI calculator, but I could not try the ROI calculator because it was blurred out by a modal dialog that requires the user to submit personal and company information and authorize a Microsoft salesperson to contact the user.

    or just uninstall the apps

    Just uninstalling the apps doesn't undo the fact that having downloaded them in the first place counts against the monthly data transfer allowance that your ISP imposes.

    1. Re:How much does Windows 10 Enterprise cost? by jonesy16 · · Score: 2

      It's funny to me that on a site like Slashdot, we can have a confluence of the raging "I hate Windows", the blind recommendations of "everyone should switch to Linux" and at the same time admit that we are subject to ISP's where a 100 MB download is something we need to be concerned about.

      If technology is your true obsession in traditional Slashdot sense, then you could really care less about people running Windows because it's not you. You're already running Linux and think the rest of the world should just give up, and you're paying for gigabit fiber because #fiber.

      If you're anyone else, Windows gets the job done, you don't notice or don't care that 6 stupid games appeared minutes after installing your computer and quickly figured out you could right-click and uninstall them and go about your business. You'll not even be aware that the ISP's covering the majority of the population have either eliminated data caps (Comcast) or have caps so reasonably high (>350 GB) that a few hundred MB on a wasted game download is inconsequential (CenturyLink, AT&T, Cox) or you'll be thankful that in Windows you can set a connection as Metered to limit background downloads.

      https://broadbandnow.com/inter...

    2. Re:How much does Windows 10 Enterprise cost? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It costs 500$ for a single year of a msdn account. With that you get a large number of windows keys, including 50 seats of enterprise.
      Sure, it's supposed to be for application development / test... but they don't shut the keys off when the subscription expires. Just be sure to export your keys so you have them later on.

      Additionally there's a setting to allow 'suggested' applications (Show suggestions occasionally in Start), by disabling it, you disable the download of these apps. If you install a version of windows 10 offline, tweak these settings, then go online for the patches, you don't get these apps with this setting disabled.

    3. Re:How much does Windows 10 Enterprise cost? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Just uninstalling the apps doesn't undo the fact that having downloaded them in the first place counts against the monthly data transfer allowance that your ISP imposes.

      If you have such a sensitive cap then why is your connection not set to "metered" in Windows? In which case you will in fact not have those downloaded apps.

  45. Re:it turns out Microsoft never put paid to it by superwiz · · Score: 1

    No and no. You are not having a stroke. And, no, it does not make any sense.

    --
    Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
  46. Re: Malware installs bloatware... by TomBauserman · · Score: 1

    Enterprise. If you're using it for anything that even remotely resembles a business, they expect you to use enterprise. Otherwise you're someone who plays Candy Crush.

  47. Re:Bullshit by sinij · · Score: 1

    I confirm that even Enterprise Win 10 does this by default and you have to create policy to stop this from happening.

  48. Re:Malware installs bloatware... by DarkRookie · · Score: 1

    For entertainment.
    I cannot play my games on Linux.

    --
    The millennial that doesn't like most of the stuff designed for millennials.
  49. Easy fix by m0s3m8n · · Score: 2

    There is an easy fix for this that does not require anything too difficult. Use gpedit,msc and turn off all cloud content settings, then force a gpupdate. Remediate the crap that is there and you are done. Also, there are several good powershell scripts on spiceworks that will remove just about everything. Combine the two and things are good again. Also, when I set up new Windows 10 machines, I do not connect to a network until the above steps are completed.

    --
    Conservative, mod down for violating /. political norms.
    1. Re:Easy fix by DeathAndTaxes · · Score: 2

      Firstly, anything that starts off with 'Use gpedit' isn't simple. Secondly, if you cannot provide more specific advice than "turn off all cloud content settings," it's not simple. Lastly, gpedit does not come with home edition, which is what most users have.

        C:\WINDOWS\system32>gpedit.msc
        'gpedit.msc' is not recognized as an internal or external command,
        operable program or batch file.

    2. Re:Easy fix by strikethree · · Score: 1

      There is an easy fix for this that does not require anything too difficult. Use gpedit,msc and turn off all cloud content settings, then force a gpupdate.

      Don't forget to have this policy applied at each bootup because Microsoft WILL revert your changes. This is not a set-once-and-forget type of thing.

      The only thing you control is the hardware. They have claimed control over the software, which is technically a theft if you paid for Windows.

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
  50. This is why I haven't bought Windows in 12 years by Spy+Handler · · Score: 1

    Microsoft's shittyness reached intolerable levels (for me) during the Vista fiasco about 12 years ago, and I've stopped purchasing Windows. Instead I download and use pirated versions of Windows that have the phone-home "features" disabled and the worst of the bloat removed. The pirate groups that I recognize do an excellent job and also are quite trustworthy (that is, they don't put virus or trojans on it and is safe to use if you get it from their site).

  51. Re:it turns out Microsoft never put paid to it by knorthern+knight · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Put paid to X" is an obscure idiom that means to end/destroy X, in this case, ending the practice of downloading bloatware. The writer was being fancy. They really should "eschew obfuscation".

    --

    I'm not repeating myself
    I'm an X window user; I'm an ex-Windows user
  52. Re:Malware installs bloatware... by kurkosdr · · Score: 1

    Have a good graphics card? Windows is a supplementary product. Also, Windows gets better battery life on laptops. Plus there are lots of applications that only work on Windows. And the only real alternatives are Mac OS X (which runs only on Apple machines) and Ubuntu, which has problems like having to wait for repository middle-men to repackage apps like VLC before you can get them. Microsoft has the desktop and laptop market by the balls and they know it. Still, nobody plays Candy Crush on a frickin' laptop, so Microsoft, in their attempt to turn their "store" into a passive income source are needlessly burning goodwill...

  53. Re: Malware installs bloatware... by UnknowingFool · · Score: 2

    So a home business or small office professional (lawyers, accountants, etc) have to buy Enterprise even if they have little need for many of the features?

    --
    Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
  54. Re: Malware installs bloatware... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    What the hell do you think lawyers and accountants do? Them playing candy crush is more productive to society and anything else they ever do (which is mostly about enriching themselves).

  55. Re:Easy fix: LTSB/LTSC by Blue+Stone · · Score: 1

    "LTSB is a licensing option for Windows 10 Enterprise and is available only for customers with a Volume License agreement."

    Not such an easy fix.

    --
    Corporation, n. An ingenious device for obtaining individual profit without individual responsibility. - Ambrose Bierce
  56. Microsoft never gives a good user experience. by stooo · · Score: 1

    >> " This is not a good user experience, Microsoft."
    Yep.
    Microsoft never gives a good user experience.
    Did you expect something else ? why ?

    --
    aaaaaaa
  57. Re:Malware installs bloatware... by kurkosdr · · Score: 1

    I on the other hand don't understand neckbeards who still pretend Windoze should not be the preference of "tech people". Mac OS X is an elitist OS with slow hardware uptake, and unless the Desktop Linux people solve the problem of "my 2.5-year old LTS cannot get the latest VLC because the repository middle-men haven't repackaged it yet", I am not going nowhere near Desktop Linux, thank you very much. And so will 98% of the populance, tech people or not. Stop trying to pretend Desktop Linux is the natural home of "tech people". The release candidate of Windows 7 managed to get more "tech people" to install it than the entirety of Desktop Linux ecosystem, despite not being marketed by Microsoft in any way. Those were "tech people" who actively avoided and still avoid Desktop Linux despite being free.

  58. Re:Just give the app 0 stars by DarkRookie · · Score: 1

    Doesn't really do anything
    All you will get is a boiler plate thank you for using our app we have sent the review to the relevant teams and nothing changes.

    --
    The millennial that doesn't like most of the stuff designed for millennials.
  59. Re:Malware installs bloatware... by jellomizer · · Score: 1

    I like Linux, but Windows has some advantages, that is why My system is setup for duel boot.
    This is my experience, other peoples impressions may very (Due to differences in hardware)
    1. UI seems to have better responses times. From watching a video, playing games, or just dealing with a Code Editor the UI seems to run a bit more quickly and more responsibly.

    2. Better support for hardware and drivers. Heck on a System 76 Laptop supposedly built for Linux, the Fingerprint reader works in Windows but not in Linux. Also If I have some USB Device, there is a better chance of it working for Windows.

    3. Software Availability. Unfortunately for some software there really isn't a good Linux version, or replacement. I have yet to find something really comparable to Photoshop. GIMP is usable but not really that good.

    4. Works better with well work. If you work for a company that is a Microsoft Shop, then having windows to do you work with it makes things much easier. (and not getting blamed for using a silly hacked solution)

    5. Libraries, There are a bunch of good libaries that are windows only, and most of the open source libraries for Linux have a windows port.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  60. Linux/windows games by keith_nt4 · · Score: 1

    I watched this video immediately before opening slashdot and seeing this story. By coincidence.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    I actually already knew something about this. Just happen to see Linus' rendition. Not Torvalds. The other one.

    Seems like Valve really has had it out for MS going to back windows 8. Now there's really no reason to run Win 10 any more. Unless you want to manage hyper-v.

    --
    "UNIX is very simple, it just needs a genius to understand its simplicity." -Dennis Ritchie
    1. Re:Linux/windows games by keith_nt4 · · Score: 1

      Well i assumed it is still a work in progress. Not sure how much I really want the DRM crap on my PC anyway whether windows or linux. Might have to give it a few more years for it be primetime ready. I can use wine or something else if there's something i really can't live without. I haven't gotten into PUBG anyway. I did put Fortnite on my Switch though.

      --
      "UNIX is very simple, it just needs a genius to understand its simplicity." -Dennis Ritchie
  61. Why not? by OneHundredAndTen · · Score: 2

    I mean, people keep getting Windows despite all the abuse they are subjected to.

    1. Re:Why not? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I mean, people keep getting Windows despite all the abuse they are subjected to.

      That's because people in general don't crumble into a ball of tears whenever they get their feelings hurt. If having Candy Crush installed is "abuse" then yeah humans in generally will happily take "abuse", hell some (bored housewives) may even thank Microsoft for their thoughtful "abuse".

      Now if you'll excuse me I need to "abuse" on the Firefox update on my machine. That's how we're using that word right? Maybe I'll reboot my phone while I'm at it so the latest update can be "abused" on the phone.

  62. Re:This a a Wonderful Feature by omnichad · · Score: 1

    "Enterprise-grade" only describes capabilities and code quality. Actually subscribing to the Enterprise version means you've paid the protection money to make sure nothing bad happens to the nice set up you've got there.

  63. Perspective of a vendor by MobyDisk · · Score: 1

    As a vendor who sells Windows pre-installed on my machines, I am outraged by this! Microsoft should be pre-installing MY bloatware, not someone else's bloatware! I demand that Microsoft automatically install 3 firewalls, 4 backup utilities, 2 CD burners, 30-day trials of all Intuit software, plus a free office suite that can't open any formats you've ever heard of.

  64. Re: Malware installs bloatware... by jellomizer · · Score: 1

    Perhaps, But I doubt you will see to many Open Source Development projects for "Rare use device, made by only a few vender's who will only offer support if you use their own software"

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  65. Re:First sentence by jellomizer · · Score: 1

    Well how to define bloatware? Is it just a program that is installed that you never use, or not needed by an other application?
    If that is the case Bloat where was around back in the MSDos 3 days. If you weren't a programmer, why is you disk filled with GWBasic!
    MSDos 5 you got these silly games where you throw bananas at each other.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  66. So 2012... wait a minute... by Koreantoast · · Score: 1

    I was going to joke about how Candy Crush is so 2012, and then I saw they're still pulling in hundreds of millions of dollars per year with around 300 million active users a month (at least at the end of 2017). So uh... I guess for a large part of the population, it's still a key application that should be standard...?

  67. If you're running win 10 by maxbuzz · · Score: 1

    Your computer belongs to M$.

  68. Re:Malware installs bloatware... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Seriously.

    Do you really consider Windows a necessity of the same magnitude as air, rail transportation etc? Talk about a Stockholm syndrome.

    No wonder you'll get raped for all eternity, you're essentially telling us you can't live without Windows and thus a total hostage to Microsoft. It's bizarre. You're actually mentally ill.

  69. Re:Malware installs bloatware... by fbobraga · · Score: 1

    almost all app are web apps that run on a browser, by a few years now: it's just an excuse to use Windoze, in the majority of cases * I used to work for serpro.gov.br : almost all desktops there runs linux (besides a few cases where run Windoze is needed, there's some [normally old] managers that still use windows by lack of knowledge...)

  70. Except that you can not by Cyberax · · Score: 4, Informative

    The thing is, you simply can NOT buy Win 10 Enterprise unless you are a large company. They sell licenses starting with 50 users.

    1. Re:Except that you can not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      The thing is, you simply can NOT buy Win 10 Enterprise unless you are a large company. They sell licenses starting with 50 users.

      This is only true for what they call an "E5" enterprise agreement.

      There is also a lower "E3" enterprise licensing model that only requires 5 device licenses, usually $150 each but you can purchase a placeholder device cal that is $30 to fill in the required 5 total.
      It's then $84/user/year with no real minimum requirement.

      E3 does not come with a deployment image version of windows 10 enterprise, but instead as an upgrade to windows 10 professional.
      That does mean you'll need a licensed copy of 10 pro to upgrade to enterprise, but they do allow OEM pro versions as well as retail and system builder.

      Don't get me wrong, it's still far more expensive and complicated than this should be, and it's asinine to have removed the basic local/group policy functionality out of professional edition.

      But with a 5 computer minimum in E3, enterprise edition isn't completely out of reach even for a home user. Even if it's still complete bullshit to be necessary in the first place.

  71. Old Article by Edgewood_Dirk · · Score: 1

    Did no one else notice this is from February? How is this "news"? I know it's still happening, but come on, did someone just feel like digging up anti-M$ dirt?.

  72. Re:Malware installs bloatware... by fbobraga · · Score: 1

    The problem basically comes down to IT support, which is still strongly Winblows.

    yeap, and tech-savy people using windows (mostly for playing games...) is a bad example (stimulating non tech-savy people to use it...), I think...

  73. Re:Malware installs bloatware... by supremebob · · Score: 1

    Be careful that you're not standing in a glass house before throwing stones at Microsoft. Ubuntu has a history of installing third-party crap into their default installations as well. Apple doesn't, but MAN they really make it hard not to pay for an upgraded iCloud account if you're using one of their devices.

  74. Re:Malware installs bloatware... by fbobraga · · Score: 1
    I don't expressed myself well - correcting:

    I don't understand tech people that still uses crap like Windoze in this personal (not "for work") desktop...

  75. Re:Malware installs bloatware... by fbobraga · · Score: 1

    The post is not related to any particular distro...

  76. Hmm... by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

    And Microsoft wonders why so many companies are still using Windows 7! Here's a hint: I don't need Candy Crush on my work computer!

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  77. Re:Malware installs bloatware... by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

    Apple doesn't, but MAN they really make it hard not to pay for an upgraded iCloud account if you're using one of their devices.

    Interesting, I"ve never run into this with my Apple stuff (iPad, iPhone and mbp).

    In fact, until just recently, I'd never really even used the iCloud that came free with it, and I only use that just enough now to help keep sync between the 3 items the messages, etc.....

    I've never seen a reason to, nor felt compelled to pay for iCloud and I use my Macs for a LOT of stuff.....can you give some examples where they are making "it hard not to pay for an upgraded iCloud account if you're using one of their devices."

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  78. Well there's your problem by Weaselmancer · · Score: 1

    This is not a good user experience, Microsoft.

    You're assuming that Microsoft wants to give you a good user experience. They do not. They want to make money. And since Candy Crush is paying them more than you are, this is the result.

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
  79. Re:Malware installs bloatware... by sconeu · · Score: 1

    Really? How is a web app supposed to know about an attached hardware device (in this case, a special purpose 3d scanner for orthodontics)?

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  80. Thanks Microsoft! by Improbus · · Score: 1

    Thanks for giving me the push to finally move my computing infrastructure to Linux/BSD.

  81. MSMG Toolkit by Krutontar · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So there is this handy little utility called the MSMG Toolkit. You'll have to make a junk login for the forum but it's well worth it. https://forums.mydigitallife.n... Basically, you can modify your ISO so annoying things like Windows Store, Cortana, Edge, every single app, all kinds of things just aren't there when you do your clean install or upgrade from DVD. Not "disabled"...I mean not there at all. It's not the most user friendly thing in the world but there is a handy youtube video where the dude walks you through it. It's like of like that old utility nLite for windows XP except without a pretty GUI. Makes the new Windows 10 experience a lot more tolerable.

  82. Re:Malware installs bloatware... by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

    Seriously.

    Do you really consider Windows a necessity of the same magnitude as air, rail transportation etc? Talk about a Stockholm syndrome.

    No wonder you'll get raped for all eternity, you're essentially telling us you can't live without Windows and thus a total hostage to Microsoft. It's bizarre. You're actually mentally ill.

    If I'm writing software for people using Windows machines. Yes. If I'm supporting people using Windows machines. Yes.

    It's only a fantasy land that all your clients run Linux desktops.

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  83. Re:Malware installs bloatware... by dmitrygr · · Score: 1

    Battery life. My laptop (t470) gets 20h battery life streaming a youtube video over wifi in windows, and 7h doing the same in linux. I get 6 hours compiling linux kernel in a loop in a linux vm, and only 4 doing the same in linux natively on the same hardware. microsoft has better docs from intel, and until this changes, linux on laptop is only a joke, or for people who do not care about battery life one notable exception: chromebooks, because google also gets ecret intel docs i assume.

    --
    -------
    1. Enjoy your job
    2. Make lots of money
    3. Work within the law

    Choose any two.
  84. What about Windows 10 Enterprise Edition? by walterbyrd · · Score: 1

    Same bloat?

  85. Re: Malware installs bloatware... by fbobraga · · Score: 1

    You are talking about a very specific case, that may need windoze...

  86. Re:Malware installs bloatware... by Gr8Apes · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You'd think HIPAA requirements would send that straight to a *NIX type machine, as Win anything is wholly incapable of meeting the security aspects.

    --
    The cesspool just got a check and balance.
  87. Re: Malware installs bloatware... by fbobraga · · Score: 1

    Very strange... Battery life is not so different in laptops I've got some contact with...

  88. Re:Malware installs bloatware... by Gr8Apes · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I don't understand tech people that still uses crap like Windoze...

    ...

    Windows is the most common platform out there- of course a large number of tech workers are still going to be using it.

    It's interesting then that in my world, the windows using tech worker is an exception. Hundreds of devs and tech workers I work with all use *nix of one flavor or another. Why? Because everything they do pretty much interacts with a *nix server. In fact, I can't recall touching a windows "server" in at least 5 years at a multitude of clients big and small.

    --
    The cesspool just got a check and balance.
  89. Re: Malware installs bloatware... by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    Haha if only. All kinds of scientific, industrial and automotive equipment interface software only runs on Windows, all from industries that should bloody well know better.

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  90. Re:Malware installs bloatware... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    That's living from the status quo and a coasting on inertia, not necessity.

    Windows isn't necessary. Society was working pretty well up to the late 1980's when Microsoft became dominant. If Microsoft went insta-kaboom, it would still continue to work. It would certainly be problematic until the problems it would cause were solved were solved, but they would be solved. You'd be amazed how fast all kinds of solutions not involving Microsoft would pop up if they just went away, because suddenly there's a motivation rather than whiny resistance. It certainly wouldn't be a disaster like removing air or rail transport, statements like that is just an insane amount of hyperbole from hysterics who are afraid of change.

  91. Re:Malware installs bloatware... by sconeu · · Score: 1

    Oh, I agree. When Win 10 first came out, I submitted an article that I titled "Is Windows 10 a HIPAA Violation Waiting To Happen?".

    Unfortunately, at this point, when you buy new computing hardware, you can't get 7 or 8 (as bad as 8 was, it didn't have this shit).

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  92. Re: Malware installs bloatware... by sconeu · · Score: 1

    Dude, your sig is SO appropriate to this topic, and your comment in particular.

    Congratulations (and I'm serious there).

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  93. Re:Malware installs bloatware... by HotNeedleOfInquiry · · Score: 1

    "It's a poor craftsman that blames his tools", and sometimes Windows is the tool you have to use.

    --
    "Eve of Destruction", it's not just for old hippies anymore...
  94. Re: Malware installs bloatware... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The problem is our lives revolve around proprietary software, that aren't run by people like who... So Windows it is

  95. Re: Malware installs bloatware... by grep+-v+'.*'+* · · Score: 1

    Microsoft Store? What's that?

    (I'm just a personal user and not a company anything, so this configuration probably isn't for you.) I've got legal copies of windows, yet I run a Pirated Windows LTSB version (Verified ISO.) It works perfectly fine, I've got control of when updates happen (although it still occasionally full-screen nags), and I don't have to put up with monthly experiments on the GUI.

    I can't purchase things from the Microsoft Store since the app is missing, but I consider that a baseline GOOD thing. My login creds are strictly local without having to touch the internet. Oh, and did I mention that my interface stays stable over time?

    I do like the configuration in 57368280, although that's a bunch of extra work. Also, I *DO* think there's a way to uninstall the Store in normal Windows (or maybe hiding it or its target directories behind special ACLs), just do it before connecting to the internet.

    --
    If the universe is someone's simulation -- does that mean the stars are just stuck pixels?
  96. Re:Malware installs bloatware... by Gojira+Shipi-Taro · · Score: 1

    If you honestly think someone like me is going to give up their favorite hobby to avoid setting a "BAD EXAMPLE" you're incredibly naiive. And no I'm not going to switch to Linux compaitble games. That's like giveing up chocolate for carob on religious grounds. Never going to happen.

    --
    "Oh my God. This is terrible. This is the end of my Presidency. I'm fucked."; ~ Donald J. Trump
  97. Much bigger problem: Start Menu by dryo · · Score: 1

    Hey, this is annoying. It sucks to have bloatware installed automagically. But what is much worse? The fact that I can't organize the Start Menu anymore. All of the bloatware Windows Store Apps such as "Mixed Reality Portal" are at the top level of an alphabetical list. I can't put them in a subfolder labeled "Crap" ... or, as I label it in the Apple domain, "iCrap"

  98. Re: Malware installs bloatware... by fbobraga · · Score: 1

    Principles, principles... :P

  99. Re:Bullshit by DogDude · · Score: 1

    If there's software to connect to the Internet, your drive isn't wiped.

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
  100. Welcome to the Matrix. by cyn1c77 · · Score: 1

    You are the resource.

  101. Can't make a living selling operating systems by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

    There isn't money in selling operating systems anymore (or really for the last 20 years). It's all about the bundling deals with partners.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  102. Re:Malware installs bloatware... by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

    But you absolutely can buy new computing hardware without windows as just a few examples. So there's no excuse for buying substandard security for any reason.

    --
    The cesspool just got a check and balance.
  103. Easy solution by s_p_oneil · · Score: 1

    Easy solution: Uninstall the Windows Store completely (along with anything else you want gone listed in this link):

    https://www.laptopmag.com/arti...

    Store: Get-AppxPackage *windowsstore* | Remove-AppxPackage

    1. Re:Easy solution by s_p_oneil · · Score: 1

      I don't usually do this, but I'm going to reply to my own post because Microsoft can simply reinstall that crap every 6 months when they put out a new OS update.

      A slightly more complicated solution would be to add those commands to a PowerShell script file and add it either to the list of Startup commands or to the Windows Task Scheduler to re-run it periodically.

    2. Re:Easy solution by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      Even with these caveats, still a good suggestion.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  104. Re:I like Linux by overlook77 · · Score: 1

    I think 'drooling idiots that use Windows' is a tad harsh. I have to use Windows at work like most people. I tried to run Linux at home on the family computer several times but it just got old when all your Steam games wouldn't work, or the kids want to play Roblox and there was no Linux support, or you hardware choices were limited.

  105. Re:I like Linux by overlook77 · · Score: 1

    I would add I am still holding onto Windows 7 as long as possible...

  106. Re: Malware installs bloatware... by cciechad · · Score: 1

    I second this I dual boot a fairly modern i7 8th gen Asus laptop and as long as the activities are usually similar (ie mostly using the integrated graphics vs the discreet) I find runtimes very close and usually Linux(4.19 kern Manjaro) seems to edge out Windows.

    --
    https://www.fsf.org/associate/support_freedom
  107. Re: Malware installs bloatware... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Tell me that again.

    I work for one of worlds largest engineering firms, and they still run Windows 7SP1

    When Linux, out of the box can do the following, then it is enterprise ready:
    A) run all Autodesk software going back to 2014
    B) run all Adobe software count back to CS4
    C) remotely deploy software patches while the user is still using the machine without forcing them off it and losing their work.
    D) remotely install the OS unattended, and not just Dell Servers with OOB DRAC cards.
    E) work with all NVidia Quadro parts
    F) work with all NVme drives
    G) work with thunderbolt usb-c hardware docking stations and proprietary dell models.
    H) work with usb license dongles

    Linux works okay for cheap web hosting (Free/NetBSD is better) but really what is holding Linux back is one standard hardware configuration that Adobe and Autodesk can work on. If that hurdle could be reached, Iâ(TM)m sure nvidia would be encouraged to develop enterprise drivers. Until then, there are none.

  108. Re:With Windows 10, you no longer own your compute by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1

    You have the same relationship with almost any of the auto-updates sources you likely have enabled, regardless of OS.

    --
    This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
  109. This post is very confusing to me. by PCM2 · · Score: 2

    This post is very confusing to me. EVERY Windows 10 PC? I've been using Windows 10 for years and NOTHING from a third party has EVER been installed automatically onto my machine. And by "machine," I mean a half-dozen different machines. I'm on a Windows 10 machine right now and none of the listed applications is installed on it. I last bought a brand-new Windows 10 machine in June and none of these apps is installed on it, either. So where is this idea coming from? I'd really like to know.

    --
    Breakfast served all day!
  110. Re: Malware installs bloatware... by NikeHerc · · Score: 1

    Things as simple as editing an old excel file just don't work properly.

    Maybe you're doing something wrong. LibreOffice works like a champ with all my spreadsheets.

    microsoft free (and good riddance) since July 4th.

    --
    Circle the wagons and fire inward. Entropy increases without bounds.
  111. Re: Malware installs bloatware... by tysonedwards · · Score: 1

    Canâ(TM)t agree more. Even on a prosumer front, using a Thunderbolt 3 docking station causes compatibility issues on Linux where I simply canâ(TM)t address an external GPU reliably - and thatâ(TM)s acknowledging the current cold plug requirement for External GPUs. The work around is to host a VM, present the secondary card to it, and then distribute tensorflow models to it for execution. Anything short of that and itâ(TM)s a 50/50 chance whether it will run on my laptopâ(TM)s discrete gpu or give me the external. And for those of you who go âoeyou should be using a desktop or a cloud hostâ, Iâ(TM)d like to say âoeI travel quite a bitâ.

    --
    Thirty four characters live here.
  112. Re:Malware installs bloatware... by sconeu · · Score: 1

    Again, the issue is that some (external) hardware requires Windows. And you can't buy 7, other than third party, and it's EOL'ed beginning of 2020. Similarly, as atrocious as 8 is, it's EOL'ing in 2023.

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  113. Re:Malware installs bloatware... by Xnet+Project · · Score: 1

    We have 1 machine used for gaming as the reset is Linux. Sadly it's purpose most days is media, music, and gaming.

    Two things keeping us on a singular Windows machine:

    1.) FL Studio (We just like how it works versus other DAW's)
    2.) Gaming as a whole (not just some games.)

    Once we can get past these without having to run a Windows VM to run an application we'd prefer to a higher native degree, then we will be 100% Linux.

  114. Re: Malware installs bloatware... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

    Possibly, but there are a lot of technical oriented tools that only work on Windows. You may be able to find alternatives of course but it's a lot of extra work and the alternatives often aren't as good as the original. A lot of this comes from having Windows programmers be so numerous and inexpensive. Other times they just don't want to pay the cost of maintaining expensive software on more than one platform. These are a big driver of VM software so that you can use the tools even if on Mac or Linux.

    For a good example, FPGA software for the popular vendors.

  115. Re: Malware installs bloatware... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

    Apparently Windows 10 Pro no longer means Professional. Pro users are also treated badly even though it's impossible to buy the Enterprise edition if you're not actually an enterprise.

    The whole point behind the big changes in Windows 8 and 10 was to monetize the customers. Microsoft wanted a piece of the pie that they assumed Apple and Google were getting, only doing this on the PC rather than in content displaying devices.

  116. Re: Malware installs bloatware... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

    Windows 10 Enterprise seems to only be available through Volume Licensing. I don't know exactlly what qualifies as Volume Licensing, but I'm pretty sure it's more than most small businesses.

  117. Re:Bullshit by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

    I really doubt that Microsoft is doing this.

    I don't. I found Candy Crush on my Win 10 system after the last (and I mean last) forced update when I was looking in Defender for a way to open a hole in the firewall. There was a hole for Candy Crush there. Huh?

    You can't buy a "mac OS" DVD and install it on some random hardware, which is what a "clean install" means in common parlance.

    "Clean install" means installing onto an empty hard drive, not "random hardware". Windows doesn't run on "random hardware", either. Yes, you can do a clean install on MacOS. I've done it when I had to replace a failed hard drive on a Macbook.

  118. Re: Malware installs bloatware... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

    But who plays Candy Crush on a laptop, and why?

  119. Re:Malware installs bloatware... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

    Because Windows has historically sucked as a development environment. It has ever so slightly improved over time but it's still just a wannabe if you're not developing Windows applications.

  120. Fiber in some places costs 6 figures by tepples · · Score: 2

    If technology is your true obsession in traditional Slashdot sense

    Many people for whom technology is their true obsession have friends or relatives for whom technology is not their true obsession.

    then you could really care less about people running Windows because it's not you.

    I regularly use Xubuntu but must support friends and relatives using Windows. Some use Windows because all applications or peripherals in a particular category are incompatible with X11/Linux.

    You're already running Linux and think the rest of the world should just give up, and you're paying for gigabit fiber because #fiber.

    If fiber costs 6 figures where you live,[1][2][3] you're probably not going to get fiber even if you are technically inclined.

    You'll not even be aware that the ISP's covering the majority of the population

    Several of my friends are or were among the minority who use satellite or fixed cellular because they live in an area not covered by fiber or cable.

    or you'll be thankful that in Windows you can set a connection as Metered to limit background downloads.

    Does "Metered" stop these particular applications from being downloaded? Last time I used Windows 10, I seem to remember that the UI of Windows Update stated that some updates (to the effect) "necessary to keep Windows running" would still be downloaded over metered connections. In addition, the UI allows marking only Wi-Fi, not an Ethernet connection to a satellite or cellular modem, as metered. It's possible to mark Ethernet as metered but only with registry tweaks.

    [1] "Want fiber Internet? That’ll be $383,500, ISP tells farm owner" by Jon Brodkin
    [2] "Man builds house, then finds out cable Internet will cost $117,000" by Jon Brodkin
    [3] "Victorian couple quoted up to $1.2m to connect to NBN Co's fibre service" by Jessica Longbottom and Ben Knight

  121. Re:Malware installs bloatware... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

    Even for Windows shops they've moved everything to the cloud (because the masters at Microsoft told them to). Word, Excel, Sharepoint, Outlook, and all the "must have" Windows crap is now in the cloud. I was really worried after my company was acquired by a big Windows oriented company, but so far the Macs work great because all the Windows stuff is online.

    Although a Mac has always worked reasonably well with Office. Unlike an earlier job where I had one Windows computer for email and Office apps and a second computer to do the actual work; crazy but that's why office chairs swivel.

  122. Re:Malware installs bloatware... by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

    Then the answer has been in the special case above: buy a special purpose machine, and keep it air-gapped. Yes, that makes transfers a pain in the ass, but at least you won't be leaking patient records to the world.

    --
    The cesspool just got a check and balance.
  123. Re:Malware installs bloatware... by mathew7 · · Score: 1

    I just bought the Surface Go to install linux (xubuntu 18.04) on it. Out of box experience is the best I've had with tablets (since all I tried were Atom based and this is Core M successor, as in really a Core i chip).
    The 1st problem was wifi chip (a bin download solved this).
    After 1 week, I got to the details:
    - idle desktop power draw: 1.5-2W in W10, 3W in ubuntu
    - 1080p60 streaming: 7w in W10, 10W in ubuntu
    So....now I want to see where I can reduce power consumption; and video streaming is a problem as only chromium-dev has HW decoding and is really unstable.

    Oh...shit.....MS still got my money!

  124. Re:Malware installs bloatware... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

    When you say that manufacturer's support Windows, that is true, but it goes a bit further. For instance, many USB devices will only work on Windows but mysteriously fail on other systems because those device don't follow standards.

  125. Re:Bullshit by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

    If there's software to connect to the Internet, your drive isn't wiped.

    Welcome to Pixie, my friend.

  126. Re: Malware installs bloatware... by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

    You do understand that Enterprise is entirely overkill for most small businesses right like a one person law office. You do understand that Enterprise is per year licensing right? Please tell me why a lawyer in a one person law firm should get Enterprise over Pro.

    --
    Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
  127. This is explicitly illegal in Canada by davecb · · Score: 1

    The CRTC has fined companies, for example A $250,000 Reminder that "CASL" is Not Just an Anti-Spam Law

    , In that case, the action was taken under Canada’s Anti-Spam Law using section 8 of the Act, which prohibits the installation of software without consent, including malware.

    There are at least two class actions waiting for the proclamation of a section which allows American-style suits in additional to prosecution. Guess who they target?

    See also https://crtc.gc.ca/eng/interne...

    --
    davecb@spamcop.net
  128. Not a good experience by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    > This is not a good user experience, Microsoft.

    Well, not for *us*. It's great for Microsoft.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  129. Re: Malware installs bloatware... by sconeu · · Score: 1

    WTF? I agree with you. And was complimenting you.

    My point was that even Enterprise has this shit, maybe less, but still has it, even though "it's not got much spam in it".

    There is NO reason that they should force Enterprise on anyone to avoid bullshit. I can see this in Home, but Pro versions should be able to stop this shit.

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  130. Re:Stop using Windows by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    Seriously, unless you are a gamer, why use Windows? A Linux install will get you access to Chrome or Firefox just like Windows will. Go buy a Mac if you want. Just stop using Microsoft products and they'll take notice.

    The only thing I still need Windows for is Adobe Creative Cloud. Which doesn't quite work under Wine. The moment there exists a native port to Linux, I'll leave M$ and Apple behind and never look back.

    Why not a mac? Because I don't want to be locked into the hardware. I can build a high performance Linux or even Windows box for a fraction of the cost of a mac, and it's equipped with what I need, not with what Apple thinks I should have.

    A pox on both their houses.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  131. It was worse before by slashmydots · · Score: 1

    Some of these apps shared something, likely the microsoft installer service, with Windows Update so if you manually started running updates too soon it'd crash the install of the apps and hang windows updates and upon reboot you wouldn't be able to open the start menu. You'd click it and nothing would happen. They allegedly fixed this but all they really did was make it less prevalent.

  132. Re:Malware installs bloatware... by supremebob · · Score: 1

    Well, for one thing, your phone will stop backing itself up properly once you hit the 5 GB storage limit on the free account.

  133. Re: Malware installs bloatware... by jpaine619 · · Score: 1

    You have a problem with accountants? I get the lawyer hatred... But accountants?

  134. Re: Malware installs bloatware... by jpaine619 · · Score: 1

    I agree.. It's linux's fault it can't open old windows files.. Just like it's Windows fault that it can't read punch cards from the IBM mainframe era.

    Can't read a punch card? Windows sucks!

  135. Re:Malware installs bloatware... by jpaine619 · · Score: 1

    Many Linux distributions offer paid support. (Redhat is one).. So, you can pay for windows and get free support, or get free Linux and pay for support...

    What is the problem?

  136. Re:First sentence by toddestan · · Score: 1

    The way I remember it was WIndows 95 OSR2 would do its install and then upon the first bootup, it would immediately launch the installer for IE4 and gave you no option to cancel or decline it. Microsoft did a pretty good job of keeping you from getting out of the installer, but there was nothing they could do about the reset switch. After booting back up, the forced IE4 installer was gone and the OS was perfectly functional (as Windows 95 goes) without it. I think you may have been stuck with IE3 doing this but I don't remember now.

  137. Re:Easy fix: LTSB/LTSC by toddestan · · Score: 1

    Last time I played with it, it doesn't disable completely but basically acts like a copy that Microsoft has decided has been pirated. Since you don't actually have a license at that point I guess to Microsoft it's basically one and the same.

    Also, even if you do get a license, you couldn't just reactivate your old trial install - you have to a fresh reinstall. Don't know if that's the same either.

  138. Re:Malware installs bloatware... by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

    I don't understand tech people that still uses crap like Windoze...

    Because the other option is crapple

    --
    Wanna buy a shirt?
    https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
  139. nonsense by sad_ · · Score: 1

    and because of these types of nonsense i don't want anything to do with windows. it's just one more item to add to an already long list of things that windows does.
    you don't need windows, or at least 95% (if not more) of _home_ users are perfectly fine on another (linux based) OS.

    --
    On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.
  140. Pedantic by sjbe · · Score: 1

    Maybe YOU should learn what it means. You aren't "convicted" of having a monopoly.

    Thank you Captian Pedantic. You saved the day again!

    Here's a little clue for you. For a company to be convicted of abusing a monopoly (which Microsoft was) it has to first be established in a court of law that they actually ARE a monopoly. You are correct that it is not illegal to be a monopoly and that convict is technically the wrong word. The purpose of my statementi s that Microsoft's monopoly status was established beyond any doubt in a court room for anyone who foolishly doubted it prior to that. The point is that there isn't much in the way of other options for PC operating systems because Microsoft has a de-facto monopoly on PC operating systems. Monopoly status = minimal alternative options. Got it?

  141. Re:Malware installs bloatware... by sn0wflake · · Score: 1

    Pay a Linux company to run Windows... How about just using Windows? Seriously, I tried Linux several times in the span of a decade, hoping that Linux would become a strong contender to Windows. That hope faded steadily over the years when trying out new promising distributions and revisiting old distributions. I couldn't see any difference from something made in 2006 or something made in 2012. I'm not only referencing the various CLI and GUI interfaces, I'm also referring to the experience. Nothing had been made to make life easier. Still the same poor PnP support, still a pain in the butt to try and make hardware work, still the same ugly CLI interface everywhere, and doing the simplest thing more often than not required a CLI command, or it was simply faster. Linux also feels like stacking a house of card in a bog. Take one wrong look at Linux and it comes crashing down. Everything also changes so quickly that regular software companies cant keep up with Linux. Last thing is the horrible Linux community filled to the brim with the most anti-social people you can find on Earth.

  142. Re:Malware installs bloatware... by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

    Well, for one thing, your phone will stop backing itself up properly once you hit the 5 GB storage limit on the free account.

    I back my phone up to the computer....no need for iCloud for that...

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  143. Microsoft Anti-Customer Behavior by ChodaBoyUSA · · Score: 1

    Too many people excused the anti-customer spyware/malware behavior of Microsoft and Windows 10 because "it is free". But, it is NOT FREE NOW. There is absolutely no excuse for a paid product to behave this way. I guess Microsoft will keep on until another Federal investigation occurs. Since they are charging for Windows 10 licenses now, I asked Microsoft if that version would be devoid of the spyware. They never responded, so that must mean, "no".

  144. Linux really is the answer for most by Joshs922 · · Score: 1

    We have been using Debian Linux at home for many years now and have not missed Windows. I run Windows 7 in a VM so I can run Quickbooks. That's all I need it for. I am getting more and more friends and family on Linux all the time, and it is working for them too. My uncle is an old Microsoft guy (former contractor) and now runs Linux Mint at home and at work and loves it. I got my teenage niece on Linux and she *never* calls me with problems. She called me once about how to hook up her printer. I told her to plug it in-she said "Oh, it says 'configuring printer'. Oh, hey! It's printing!" - and this was a random Canon inkjet printer. Just worked. I have my sister-in-law on Linux Mint now too.. She paid $45 for a perpetual license of Moneydance software and switched from abusive Quicken and she is off and running, downloading from her bank, etc. No issues. She's a professor in a community college in L.A. and runs Mint on her personal laptop. I got my cousin's wife on Linux Mint as well. She's been running it for a year now and I haven't had a *single* phone call for support. My mom's computer is next! I love instlalling Linux for people because *they don't call me for support ever*. :)

  145. Re:Malware installs bloatware... by kurkosdr · · Score: 1

    Most applications are developed as Windows applications, sorry.

  146. Metered Ethernet by tepples · · Score: 1

    The Windows 8/10 network GUI shows "Metered" only for Wi-Fi, not for wired Ethernet. Instead, the user has to edit the registry to change the default media cost of all Ethernet connections. If a less-technical user's desktop PC has an Ethernet connection to the satellite or fixed-cellular modem, the user is unlikely to know that it's even possible to mark Ethernet as metered.

    1. Re:Metered Ethernet by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Huh? Ethernet? Isn't that the thing that Linux users use?

      I jest, but only slightly. Ethernet is being reduced to the domain of the techhead and away from the millennial with their laptops on their couches watching adverts that ask "what is a computer".

      And for us techheads there's HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\NetworkList\DefaultMediaCost

      But I do actually have one complaint of my own for how they have implemented this system. Bluetooth access points (i.e. sharing internet on your mobile phone) appears to the system as an ethernet connection.

      But I have little sympathy for *this* complaint. Whining about your data because the Windows store downloads Candy Crush on a system well known for downloading multi gigabyte OS updates in the background without warning or visual cue is a disingenuous. I struggle to get outraged, especially since the downloading of "Suggestions" is controllable by a windows setting.

  147. Re:Malware installs bloatware... by BitterOak · · Score: 1

    Because some of our clients have specialized equipment with interface software that only runs on Windows?

    That may be true in some cases, but I bet the vast majority of Windows installations are on systems without any special hardware at all.

    --
    If I can be modded down for being a troll, can I be modded up for being an orc, or a balrog?
  148. Re:Malware installs bloatware... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

    True, but that doesn't mean the development environment doesn't suck.

  149. Re:Malware installs bloatware... by kurkosdr · · Score: 1

    It doesn't. Unix weenies think it does.

  150. Re:Malware installs bloatware... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

    The Windows development environment starts by buying additional tools, usually IDEs in which you spend all your time so that you don't have to interact with the rest of Windows.

  151. Bloatware removal by arcadesdude · · Score: 1

    Have to run it each time after update but much easier to remove than manually doing each one. http://github.com/arcadesdude/...

    --
    --arcades
  152. Re:Malware installs bloatware... by jpaine619 · · Score: 1

    By all means use Windows. I'm not a zealot and think a person should use what they want to use or what works best for them. I still have a Windows 7 PC. It does some things that I haven't been able to accomplish on Linux (running Photoshop for one example). And yes, Linux does not have drivers for all brand new devices/peripherals. Although, it is fairly easy to find out if a particular device does have driver support or not. Most of the time, if the hardware is common (printer, etc), the driver will appear eventually.

    But.... if you are going to use Windows you will have to resign yourself to the fact that you don't/can't know everything it is doing. I think it is somewhat fair to say that at this point maybe MS doesn't exactly have your best intentions at heart.. Windows 10 seems to be on track to be a walled garden and an ad delivery system. It's not exactly there yet, but I don't think it's hyperbole to say that it is at least at few steps down that path. MS is certainly back up to their old tricks with Edge and Windows 10. We've seen the pop-ups that claim that using anything besides Edge is somehow "insecure". I personally think that is a load of bullshit and is a very typical MS tactic. They've been pulling this crap since the DR-DOS days...

    I do believe that Linux is the better choice, all things being equal. i.e. If what you need to do can be accomplished in both, then I would recommend Linux. The Linux live-cds / thumbdrives have made testing hardware configurations pretty easy.

    I am 100% Linux (or modified Linux) for my business. I absolutely will not trust MS / Windows with anything critical. Your mileage / opinion may be different, and that's fine. But for me, Linux (Debian and RouterOS) have proven themselves over and over again for stability and reliability. Yeah, I have to go through an extra step or two when choosing hardware, but I'm okay with that.

    All OS's will have security issues from time to time and Linux is no exception, but the reaction times (in my experience) seem to favor Linux when one measures the time from exploit to patch. There certainly are also far more attacks on Windows. Certainly part of that is because it is a much larger target audience, but I'm sure some of it is due to design deficiencies. Windows has an awful large burden of legacy code or legacy compatibility to lug around. Linux not so much..

    I would recommend taking another look at Linux, specifically Linux Mint.. It's one hell of a nice OS. It might change your view on Linux.. You can get a Live CD for it, so it's a painless test process.

    I'm very happy that I made the switch (mostly) to Linux about two decades ago (Debian 2.2 if memory serves).. I have never regretted it. I do still have to keep that one laptop with Win7 around, but its days are numbered. Once support for Windows 7 ends I will not upgrade to a newer MS OS. Worst case scenario; I'll buy one last Win7 license and install it in a VM.

  153. Re:Resistance is futile. by jenningsthecat · · Score: 1

    if only someone would actually make a distribution that works on every f**king machine I have without it f**king up on some or other thing on at least every computer I have, except for that single one computer, which gets f**ked up after the first upgrade.

    SERIOUSLY WTF :tableflip:

    passphrase : artifact

    That's a pretty good job of trolling you did there. Good enough, in fact, that I can use it as a springboard for something useful. Microsoft has the active and willing co-operation of virtually every hardware vendor in the space, while Linux devs get very little of that co-operation, and in fact often have to resort to very complex and time-consuming reverse engineering. Many of the people who do this volunteer their time, and as much as I swear at Linux for its various deficiencies, I always feel deep gratitude for those who provide and maintain it, and I always keep in mind how much worse Windows is in so, so many ways. Not the least of which is that, whenever I'm forced to use Windows, I feel as though I've been slimed and need to take a shower. In particular, using Windows 10 makes me feel viscerally disgusted, and I only do it when the need is extreme. Linux never provokes that reaction in me.

    --
    'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
  154. Re: Malware installs bloatware... by kurkosdr · · Score: 1

    Every other operating system (Android, Windows Mac OS X, iOS, even frickin' AmigaOS) works the normal way, aka the developer creates the package and either uploads it to some website or to some "store". Only Desktop Linux (and to a lesser degree Unix) imposes the need of repository middlemen who will repackage applications (it's not a security fiasco waiting to happen, honest) or forces the user to package the application himself. Stop acting as if this is something normal. PS: I will believe Snaps or Flatpack when I see them working for more than a handful of apps.

  155. Not anti-union and not neutral... by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    "We are not anti-union, but we are not neutral either" says the narrator in the video. So they're pro-union? Logically that's the only position remaining. They seem to be really bad at helping people unionize.

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    1. Re:Not anti-union and not neutral... by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Fuckin' hell, wrong tab, ignore...

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  156. This is not a good user experience, Microsoft. by Askmum · · Score: 1

    Microsoft does not give s#!t about your user experience.