Slashdot Mirror


USA Today Tech Columnist: Millennials Will Live To See a Cashless World (usatoday.com)

"I haven't had a nickel, dime, quarter or penny in my pocket for two years," writes USA Today tech columnist Jefferson Graham, adding "Why bother? We're now living in what's quickly becoming a cashless society, where credit cards or electronic payments on your phone rule."

His column is addressed to the mayor of Philadelphia, who this week signed a bill that bans cashless stores. Mr. Mayor. It's happening all over the world, and not just from Amazon. We are going cashless. Maybe not in your lifetime, but certainly for millennials. Banks and credit card companies want this to curb the costs of handling green. Selected merchants are into it now... USA Today's Charisse Jones discovered that cash purchases were down to 30 percent of all retail transactions as of last year compared to 40 percent in 2012. Millennials, she noted here this week, are saying no to cash, with 21 percent of those 23- to 34 years old saying that most of their transactions were in cash in 2016....

Mobile pay is still a sliver of overall retail sales, but it's definitely on the rise. Target, a long holdout, just added Apple Pay to one of its options, following in the footsteps of Best Buy, CVS, Costco and other retail giants who now accept payment via iPhone. The big, lone holdout right now is Walmart, the No. 1 retailer. It does have its own mobile pay app, that links bank payments to QR codes. And Mr. Mayor, good news for you. Walmart still accepts cash, too.

But for how long?

264 of 454 comments (clear)

  1. prefer cash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Unlike this crappy columnist I am a millennial with a good paying job with no debt and money in my pocket.

    I go out of my way to use cash and avoid credit cards.

    The day we have a cashless society is the day the cloud atlas economy takes hold. (i.e you are required to spend a certain amount of money a week on consumption and probably negative interest rates and financial fees as punishment if you don't)

    That or the world will migrate to Bitcoin I suppose...

    1. Re:prefer cash by religionofpeas · · Score: 2

      I also have a good paying job, no debt, but I haven't used cash in probably a year. Haven't used credit cards either. Instead I mostly use contactless payments. It's quick and easy and I don't need to carry a bulky wallet.

    2. Re:prefer cash by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I am a millennial with a good paying job with no debt and money in my pocket.
      I go out of my way to use cash and avoid credit cards.

      I'm a little older, but also debt-free and plenty of income, savings and investments. I use cash *and* credit cards, which aren't a problem if (a) they're no-fee and (b) you pay them off completely every month. Having and using them responsibly also helps your credit score -- which helps me as even my mortgage is paid off -- and you get a one-month float on your money... There's really no reason to avoid them unless you're irresponsible or stupid.

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    3. Re:prefer cash by sfcat · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I also have a good paying job, no debt, but I haven't used cash in probably a year. Haven't used credit cards either. Instead I mostly use contactless payments. It's quick and easy and I don't need to carry a bulky wallet.

      On behalf of big brother, thank you for your continuing donation of financial information that we sell to pay for our hookers and blow. That yummy financial info is worth so much more than your fb likes that seem to get you millennial types so worked up...

      --
      "Those that start by burning books, will end by burning men."
    4. Re:prefer cash by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      That yummy financial info is worth so much more

      Really ? What's so interesting about me buying some groceries, gasoline, or a new faucet for the bathroom ?

    5. Re:prefer cash by sfcat · · Score: 1

      That yummy financial info is worth so much more

      Really ? What's so interesting about me buying some groceries, gasoline, or a new faucet for the bathroom ?

      Seriously? Your FB posting history across all time is worth maybe $6 (according to FB). Your entire financial history is worth hundreds. Either you are a troll or a fool. What you post is mainly meaningless, being able to predict it is worth even less...being able to predict what you buy and why however, that's pure gold.

      --
      "Those that start by burning books, will end by burning men."
    6. Re:prefer cash by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      being able to predict what you buy and why however, that's pure gold.

      How ? Suppose you see me buying groceries 5 times a week, giving you the name of the store and the total amount that I spent. How do you propose to monetize that ? And how will that cause me harm ?

    7. Re:prefer cash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      1) More detailed purchase histories are rare but do exist and you can bet many powerful corps would love to expand upon that. Your store-linked cards do this, tiing you to every single item you spend there.

      2) Your subversive and effective fliers you handed out at a protest.. (or perhaps your kid). have your printer's UID hidden on them, it was done in the 90s to track down fake money but naturally it expanded so an FBI agent can just scan your print outs and figure out who you are. how? you bought it with a generic card! Well, the price of the item can be estimated and used to narrow down the search... aside from product registrations, store repair plans,... besides, it's not like some printers don't have a serial number in the barcode that could be scanned in... and your generic card has your name connected to it which a bigger store does get access to. This is just a tiny bit of what is involved on this one.

      3) embarrassment... buy stuff at a sex shop? buy something innocent at a biz that was later caught sex trafficing? Plan on having a job with real power? Something of use to a government in some way? Inflential on social media? upset the wrong person who has the right connections? privatized spy services are just beginning to get going. your ex's private detective may gain access to such things in the future. accusations can get you fired.

      4) private profiling. government is only 1 risk. you can't get a job and you just don't know why.... but 3rd party HR services keep telling places to not hire you. you won't know why; they won't disclose it, the employer will not even know-- that is part of the reason they hire a 3rd party. your purchase history will just be part of it.
      Walmart got into trouble for running credit checks on people to decide if they should hire--- they wanted people with bad credit because they can abuse them more!

      5) META DATA. you buy X every X at this kind of store. you likely have Y health condition. raise insurance! or don't hire them... lay them off. you might be cheating because why do you buy in these places at these times? The REAL money is in providing guesses from interpretation of the meta data. This information YOU DO NOT OWN and no privacy measures apply because their profile of you is not your property. again, potential for government abuse is HUGE -- your self-centered life might not matter-- but already with no tech--the FBI went after MLK spying on him and trying to even get him to kill himself. your influential leaders can be taken down; hell, you will help them do it by judging others so easily joining the MOB that social media is.

      6) Stupid AI profiling. your vague pattern is the same as a pedophile 60%. anybody seeing the profile will act differently to you. We all see stupid Netflix and amazon suggestions based on our profile. Imagine those being actually used for stuff...

    8. Re:prefer cash by skegg · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Sure, but the store knows the individual items that you purchased, along with your credit card.

      You do know there's an entire industry devoted to this data? Purchased & formatted neatly by data brokers and then sold for a handsome profit.

      >> And how will that cause me harm ?

      At the moment I suspect it won't. But I don't know what will happen in 10 years.
      Will you be refused health insurance because you bought too many Twinkies, and not enough greens?
      Drank too much Coke? Were making purchases at 11pm instead of being in bed?

      Personally, it's for the potential abuses that I CAN'T think of that I prefer cash.

    9. Re:prefer cash by someoneOtherThanMe · · Score: 1

      For example, if they can forecast how much they can raise grocery prices before a significant number of customers will go elsewhere, that's pure gold for them, and minor harm to you. For stuff with individual pricing (hotel rooms, plane tickets...), forecasting how much you individually are willing to pay is a bit more gold for them, and much more harm to you.

    10. Re:prefer cash by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      Will you be refused health insurance because you bought too many Twinkies, and not enough greens?

      The solution is not allowing insurance companies to refuse insurance based on purchases.

      And if you don't think that the laws will save you, you will have to worry about cameras in the store and streets following your exact movements and actions. Using cash won't save you.

    11. Re:prefer cash by Drethon · · Score: 1

      I'll worry about that when we achieve a full digital office that has been predicted for a long time. As it is, I still see plenty of notebooks at meetings and documents printed out for reviews with a pen. Even in places that have almost eliminated paper, physical white boards are still a major thing that hasn't been replaced by a digital version.

      I see physical money as the same. There are certain conveniences that digital versions cannot yet overcome without a notable expense (I would love tablet and digital whiteboard replacements for physical devices, and so would security when they put notes on our whiteboard to not leave potential export information on a whiteboard, but the cost and reliability of a digital version make this impractical. It is hard enough to get the company to even get me a good enough laptop to do my job).

    12. Re:prefer cash by hazardPPP · · Score: 1

      4) private profiling. government is only 1 risk. you can't get a job and you just don't know why.... but 3rd party HR services keep telling places to not hire you. you won't know why; they won't disclose it, the employer will not even know-- that is part of the reason they hire a 3rd party. your purchase history will just be part of it. Walmart got into trouble for running credit checks on people to decide if they should hire--- they wanted people with bad credit because they can abuse them more!

      5) META DATA. you buy X every X at this kind of store. you likely have Y health condition. raise insurance! or don't hire them... lay them off. you might be cheating because why do you buy in these places at these times? The REAL money is in providing guesses from interpretation of the meta data. This information YOU DO NOT OWN and no privacy measures apply because their profile of you is not your property. again, potential for government abuse is HUGE -- your self-centered life might not matter-- but already with no tech--the FBI went after MLK spying on him and trying to even get him to kill himself. your influential leaders can be taken down; hell, you will help them do it by judging others so easily joining the MOB that social media is.

      6) Stupid AI profiling. your vague pattern is the same as a pedophile 60%. anybody seeing the profile will act differently to you. We all see stupid Netflix and amazon suggestions based on our profile. Imagine those being actually used for stuff...

      We need to print this in bold and put it up in lots of places. People are usually afraid of the government doing something to them via data collection...the private sector can be just the same or even much worse.

    13. Re:prefer cash by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Unlike this crappy AC I don't subscribe to the instant slippery slope fallacy where every technical innovate will bring about the End Of Days (TM).

      Congratulations on sticking to cash and paper receipts. I don't bother, and no one is forcing me to spend anything.

      That or the world will migrate to Bitcoin I suppose...

      This is a tech forum. Please leave unrealistic fantasy for comments on stories about cold fusion.

    14. Re:prefer cash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      A cashless society is about *debit* cards, not *credit* cards. I carry zero debt at all time (minus my mortgage). But I also have not used cash more than once or twice in the past few years. Debit everywhere. Especially now that there are tap-enabled cards/machines.

      The only worrisome part about using cards to pay for things is that the bank has a record of every purchase that you've ever made, and God knows how they use or could use that information. (Or a hacker if it were stolen.)

    15. Re:prefer cash by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      Yup, same here. I use credit cards, but I don't let them use me.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    16. Re:prefer cash by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      being able to predict what you buy and why however, that's pure gold.
      How so?

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    17. Re:prefer cash by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      I often don't carry ID when not driving -- the law doesn't require it, so I see no reason to carry my "papers" 24/7/365.

    18. Re:prefer cash by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      This won't happen now, but if cash goes away, everyone's money is in the bank. Nothing to stop banks from charging a monthly fee (aka negative interest) to everyone for keeping their money, since there's no alternative. Contribute to the ecahhhhhnamy or lose your money.

    19. Re:prefer cash by LazarusQLong · · Score: 1

      I travel internationally quite a lot... and it turns out that CASH IS KING, in many places, everyone prefers cash outside the US, though cards are able to be used 90% of the places I go, in most though they attach an extra surcharge to using a credit card (in Sydney, Australia it was 3 % for example). So, yeah, not exactly what that columnist would have you believe. Cash is still king.

      --
      "Governments have been dominated by the corporate entities and citizens have ceased to matter in public policy" true in
    20. Re:prefer cash by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      We could fix this. Stored value cards already exist, you can top them up with cash. They store the balance on the card and use crypto to authenticate transactions. The only flaws are that they include a unique ID that allows transactions to be linked to the card, and they keep a transaction history.

      We can make a card that uses a random ID or none at all, and has no history. Then it's basically the same as cash, but more convenient.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    21. Re:prefer cash by imrahilj · · Score: 1

      Another millenial here, I use cash often. For buying and selling in person between individuals, cash is a much better option than paypal/venmo/etc.

    22. Re: prefer cash by imrahilj · · Score: 1

      Where are you in the US? I also have a debit card and infrequently use it, I have never gotten a fee for using it anywhere other than a competing ATM. In fact, I have sometimes gotten discounts for using it rather than a credit card at gas stations.

    23. Re: prefer cash by reanjr · · Score: 1

      You actually seem to be closer to what I see as the millinnial view. We may be headed to cashless, but it won't involve credit cards.

    24. Re: prefer cash by reanjr · · Score: 1

      It definitely seems to be related to laws in some states. It happens all the time here in SoCal. Never seen it in my home state of MI.

    25. Re: prefer cash by reanjr · · Score: 1

      If you can't tie the use of the card to a specific account, you probably can't be in compliance with Know Your Customer laws for money exchange.

    26. Re:prefer cash by JD-1027 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Same boat as you, but we need to go one step further. For those of us who know the proper way to use credit cards, many only GIVE you "cash" back.
      Amazon Visa - 2% restaurants always (3% on Amazon)
      Chase and Discover - Rotating 5% back on some categories

      That is free money.

      Personal note... cash is just too much of a hassle for me. I don't like always having to make sure I have enough in my wallet and dealing with change, so we usually just do credit card. I haven't run into any issues with companies knowing what I spend my money on. In some cases I get relevant coupons that actually help.

    27. Re: prefer cash by reanjr · · Score: 1

      As a responsible libertarian capitalist, what if I don't think it's fair that consumers are being systematically forced to pay higher fees for goods because of the captive market you choose to be part of?

    28. Re:prefer cash by Zemran · · Score: 1

      I use cash, contactless etc., whichever is best for what I am doing. I fail to understand this one size fits all mentality. It reminds me of when they introduced one size clothing that meant that it did not fit most people. How do you give your children pocket money in a cashless society? Am I really going to be expected to pay for a 10c item with a card? It is moronic.

      --
      I love stacking my barbecues in the shed at the end of summer - you can't beat a bit of grill on grill action.
    29. Re: prefer cash by reanjr · · Score: 1

      The problem with debit cards for the consumer is the P.O.S. fees. With credit cards, the fees are socialized so they essentially trick people into paying more. With debit cards, it's straight up, so many people buy into the credit card points game.

      And yes, many places charge fees for using a debit card. I challenge you to find a SoCal gas station or convenience store that does not.

    30. Re: prefer cash by reanjr · · Score: 1

      With inflation, we've already seen this. Between the 2008 meltdown and now, that's been the norm.

    31. Re: prefer cash by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      So we need to fix the laws as well. After all you can pay cash anonymously.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    32. Re:prefer cash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Actually he already shared the reason. You just don't recognize social responsibility as a reason. I don't define dystopian possibilities by motion picture and believe that current day realities support my concern. My concern over cashless societies is that the ability to spend can be eliminated by financial interests on a per person basis. We have already seen where entities have cut off the ability to use non cash payment systems because of political objections. They have even held already existing transactions and refused to transfer cash they were already obliged to transfer. This isn't some theoretical imaginary weakness of a cashless society as the behavior has already happened and there has been no apology for it. It WILL happen again. So intentionally using cash helps maintain a status quo that allows two parties to transact on their own terms without a huge corporate third party having immediate power to interfere.

    33. Re:prefer cash by MooseTick · · Score: 1

      "Drank too much Coke? Were making purchases at 11pm instead of being in bed?"

      You could be refused service because you bought too much with cash and they can't properly determine the risk to cover you. Or, they will only cover you at the highest rate because they are unable to assess your history.

    34. Re:prefer cash by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      I am in a similar position. Anything I spend on my credit card gets 0.5% cash back (it used to be 1%, but the EU capped card fees so now they're lower), so everything is cheaper if I pay by card. My bill is paid automatically 14 days after the statement date so the money stays in my account for 0.5-1.5 months after I make the purchase. I have an offset mortgage, so any money in my current account is reducing my payments by an amount equal to having paid that much of the mortgage off, so it's the equivalent of my credit card balance paying me my mortgage interest rate, without paying any tax on the income. The amount of money that I save by using a credit card is not huge, but it's far from negligible.

      I don't worry too much about tracking, because any company that actually wants to track me can do so almost as easily without the card. Anything that's delivered, they know my name and address anyway. I spoke to the person who runs the data mining for the supermarket chain I use and they apparently only aggregate at the store granularity because that's the information that they actually care about (they don't care what I buy, they care what things people that shop at the store near me buy).

      In terms of costs, there was a report on Slashdot a few years ago about the cost of transaction processing. A lot of cash advocates think that cash is free, but it isn't. Most merchant banks charge fees for handling large amounts of cash, you need extra security if you're keeping cash on the premises, you need to spend time balancing tills and making sure you have enough change, you need to securely transport the money to the bank, and so on. For a big chain, credit cards are a lot cheaper, for a small shop the break-even point for card payments is very low. I forget the exact number, but pretty much anywhere that can afford 2 or more employees saves money by taking cards.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    35. Re:prefer cash by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      Hello,
      I'm not a millennial, far from it, I think you're smart and this 'columnist' is an idiot.
      Carry on..

    36. Re:prefer cash by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1
      Why would you do that? I have a credit card that's automatically paid off each month. There are a few differences between that and a debit card:
      1. I get 0.5% cash back on every transaction, so I'm paying less by using a credit card than I would be on a debit card.
      2. I get an interest-free loan in between the payment date and the time that the balance becomes due (0.5-1.5 months). That money is sitting in my account where it can earn me interest (or, in my case, reduce the interest that I'm paying on my mortgage).
      3. If there are any fraudulent transactions, I can query them before the money leaves my account, when they're still very much the bank's problem.

      Oh, and the bank doesn't get detailed purchase records (you can tell by the way that they hilariously miscategorise things on statements), only the shops that you use.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    37. Re: prefer cash by mark-t · · Score: 1

      The problem with debit cards for the consumer is the P.O.S. fees.

      Depends where you bank.

      And yes, many places charge fees for using a debit card.

      The financial institution might (although again, it depends where you do your banking), but a store typically won't. By law, any additional fee the merchant asks for a debit charge is required to be displayed before you agree to complete the transaction, and cancellation of that transaction costs nothing to the consumer. In most cases, the merchant will simply stipulate a minimum purchase amount before accepting debit at all.

    38. Re:prefer cash by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      Cash allows you to avoid government scrutiny. As with much of the Constitution, the real reason of that is to stop people in power from scouring the activities of their political opponents, though it will be portrayed as trying to hide illegality.

      "If you have nothing to hide, what are you afraid of?" Exactly that.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    39. Re:prefer cash by dryeo · · Score: 1

      That is free money

      Do you think they just print up some money? Or it is money taken from others?

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    40. Re: prefer cash by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 1

      Don't you have debit/interac in the US?

      Hey Canadian Anonymous Coward - For this question to make sense to Americans you have to ask -

      "Can't you pay everywhere with your ATM card, entering your ATM PIN at the Point-of-Sale, or simply by tapping your ATM card?"

      Americans - That's what "debit / interac" means in Canada - Paying with your ATM card. But most Canadians don't realize that term means nothing to most Americans, so they use the term "debit card" which, in the American context, isn't correct.

    41. Re:prefer cash by kingbilly · · Score: 1

      The Amazon Prime card is 5% back on Amazon, you should look into that.
      I'm similar to you then, some cards with rotating categories.

      - Sams Club Credit for 5% back on gas, almost everywhere (you don't need to get fuel from Sams)
      - AMEX for 6% back at grocery stores. And 3% at some department stores.
      - Amazon Prime for 5% at Amazon like mentioned above.
      - About to round it off by getting citi double cash rewards for everything else, for 2% instead of the 1% by my existing cards.

    42. Re:prefer cash by anegg · · Score: 2

      Same boat as you, but we need to go one step further. For those of us who know the proper way to use credit cards, many only GIVE you "cash" back. Amazon Visa - 2% restaurants always (3% on Amazon) Chase and Discover - Rotating 5% back on some categories That is free money.

      It is not exactly free money. The money that you get back came from the transaction fee that the credit card levied onto the merchants who sold you goods/services. Those merchants marked up the price of their goods/services to include the credit card transaction fee, and since so many people use credit cards these days, even for small transactions, the cost of everything has been increased so that we can enjoy this "convenience." Few merchants even bother giving a discount for cash any more, so we pay the price of credit even if we don't use it. Which justifies using credit cards even more (so that we can get at least some of our cash back).

      Meanwhile, the "retail credit" industry has managed to insert themselves into practically every retail transaction, skimming their percent or two, and growing very fat doing it. Hey - apparently we like the convenience of paying with plastic, so what's the harm?

      Meanwhile, the records linking all of the purchases to the purchasers are growing in huge numbers, and can be analyzed to determine many things. And that information isn't just in the hands of the retailers, because they make agreements and sell that information off. And ultimately it is available to the government, because although various constitutional protections (in the US) keep the government out of our knickers without a warrant, there is nothing stopping the government from buying commercially whatever is available - which happens to be a lot more data than could ever be gathered with a warrant.

      So yea, congratulate yourself on knowing the "proper" way to use credit cards so that you can get back a few percent of your own money. But be aware that you are the product that is being bought and sold, with every transaction being financed by your own money, with the minuscule amount they return to you being the price at which you are being bought.

    43. Re: prefer cash by lgw · · Score: 1

      After all you can pay cash anonymously.

      Only in small amounts. You cannot pay $10k anonymously, at least not legally in the US. The paperwork burden is high enough that most companies that sell high-value items simply refuse to accept large amounts of cash.

      The exception is auction houses. Art and stamps have been the core of money laundering and wealth transfer for decades, and auction houses know where their bread is buttered. (Diamonds are also used, but always smaller diamonds worth much less than $10k individually.)

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    44. Re:prefer cash by lgw · · Score: 1

      The law requires is in many US states. Might want to check around.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    45. Re: prefer cash by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Debit cards are not as safe as a credit card. If a credit card is stolen it can be cancelled quickly and any fraudelent purchases dispuated with a cap on damage, the credit card company will take absorb the damage. With a debit card you don't have such protections usually and you can quickly lose a lot of money before you get the card cancelled (make sure there's a spending cap on the card, and refuse all the "you've been upgraded!" increases to the limit. A pre-paid credit card works much like a debit card and may be a good choice for some.

      There's an additional issue that using a credit card will help you build up a good credit score while a debit card will not. It's handy for students say, as the parents can have the bill sent to them with a monthly limit on what can be spent allowing them but the child is building up the credit score.

    46. Re: prefer cash by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Gasoline stations very often will give discounts for paying cash. However it's the main place that I use my credit card because the convenience of paying on the spot is worth the extra fee especially if it's in bad weather. However if I'm already in a cashier's line anyway then the extra credit card fee doesn't supply any advantage to me over cash.

    47. Re:prefer cash by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Also, if you're going to buy a house and want a mortgage, or you want a loan to buy an automobile (even if you plan to pay it off quickly), having a good credit score helps out a lot. You will want that mortgage someday and won't have the cash to pay for it all at once. But if you don't use a credit card then your credit score may not be very good as there's no history of paying off debts promptly and on time. Yes, it's a bit illogical that someone who goes out of his way to avoid debt is seen as a potential debt risk, but that's how things work.

      You can possibly get this to work for you without carrying a credit card all the time. Get a credit card then tie it to auto-pay with your utilities service. Ie, credit card pays the utility bill, and your bank account reconciles the credit card automatically at the end of the month.

      The key rule is to ALWAYS pay off the FULL balance of the credit card each month. The interest rates on even the best credit cards are ridiculously high. They're the easiest way to get quickly over your head in debt. Try to never have more than one credit card even though you keep getting these amazing offers in the mail. Occasionally you can use another (ie, $1500 off my refrigerator if I signed up for a Sears card) but cancel it as soon as you can.

    48. Re: prefer cash by lgw · · Score: 1

      Savings accounts have paid below inflation since we went off the gold standard. Banks are effectively charging a fee to store your money. Bit of a scam, since you're loaning the bank money, but in the modern world there are no very-low-risk investments that pay more than inflation.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    49. Re:prefer cash by PrimaryConsult · · Score: 1

      This is where the trend towards installing driving monitoring devices for lower car insurance will lead. Eventually it will be too expensive to not get one.

    50. Re:prefer cash by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      The law requires you to identify yourself to cops if arrested, not to carry papers unless you're engaged in an activity (e.g. driving) that requires it.

    51. Re:prefer cash by Rob+Cebollero · · Score: 1

      Generally agree, except for the part about migrating to Bitcoin (or a flavor of Bitcoin that actually solved numerous problems with privacy).

      This would make things much worse, because the small circle of power brokers with arbitrary leverage over your purchasing power (by controlling liquidity) would merely shift from known adversaries (banks, governments, multinationals) to unknown adversaries (the same, but with zero accountability, plus a new caste of unapologetically fuck-you criminals who don't even bother to provide a nominal fig leaf of goods or services, much less accountability, in exchange for their parasitism). Not even getting into the Randian ancaps of the early adopter cohort who openly fantasize about "hyperbitcoinization" and a future where they live the baronial life in cloistered citadels, gloating over all the poor walled-out "nocoiner" masses left behind.

      It's not even 'bitcoin' that's the problem, per se. Bitcoin is essentially just a particular approach to implementing a seductive but poorly examined doctrinal position commonly referred to as 'decentralization.' Decentralization is, at best, a temporary transitional phase between centralized regimes. At worst, it is a mirage of political economics ginned up by cynical grifters whose only common motivation is to extract wealth from a hypergolic cocktail of greed and idealism. Game summary: devise a means to blow up (er, 'decentralize') the incumbent concentric structure of wealth, position yourself in the middle of the debris field, and sit back while fundamental social forces that crystallize as 'civilization' inexorably pull everything back together into the original concentric shape - but this time, *you* get to be at the center of decentralization.

      --
      Decentralization: the brief interval between the decline of one centralized regime and rise of another.
    52. Re:prefer cash by lgw · · Score: 1

      The law requires you to identify yourself to cops if arrested, not to carry papers unless you're engaged in an activity (e.g. driving) that requires it.

      Fair point: if the police officer understands this aspect of the law, and is in a good mood, he may be satisfied with your name, DOB, and address. Less risk in carrying an actual ID card, of course, for all that we know police are always perfect angels.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    53. Re:prefer cash by Woldarp · · Score: 1

      It really is time to buy laser printers with cash.

    54. Re:prefer cash by Woldarp · · Score: 1

      That's if the credit card will even do business with you. Amazon gives their cardholders a 5% discount. So if Chase doesn't like you you have to pay 5% extra for everything at Amazon. Hope you've been taking care of your social credit score...https://fossbytes.com/china-social-credit-system-people-rating/

    55. Re:prefer cash by Woldarp · · Score: 1

      Better not say anything online to make you the target of Maoist Mobs. Wouldn't want to be charged 5% more than regular people for having the wrong views...

    56. Re:prefer cash by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      If the pigs aren't tested regularly as to their willingness to follow the law, bad ones can't be outed, publicized, and sued.

    57. Re:prefer cash by bozzy · · Score: 2

      I'm in a similar position as you and the GP, but the "free money" is only "free" up to the point when you realize that use of cash maintains the spending friction that keeps impulse buys at bay.

      Statistically speaking, you'll spend more when using a credit card compared to cash due to less friction, which blows away any savings you get with a cash back card. You'll have to be extremely well disciplined to come out ahead with the cashback card on a given transaction. But over time, the odds are stacked against us due to being human.

      A debit card has a slightly higher friction than a credit card due to the mental connection of the transaction with your bank balance. But with a credit card, there is no such friction. Even less friction when a credit card is tied to mobile pay, or god forbid, some IoT device (alexa) you don't even hold.

    58. Re:prefer cash by Woldarp · · Score: 1

      Wal*Mart bristles with cameras that store your car's license plate forever along with footage of you walking into the store. At the checkout your picture is snapped. Facial recognition is used to determine your loss risk when you walk in the door and security is notified. Wal*Mart is a private business - they can refuse you entry - but that was impractical until recently - they couldn't remember your face at all the Wal Marts, or unless you made a major pain of yourself probably wouldn't even remember you at a single Wal*Mart. Now they could concievably bar someone from all Wal*Marts. This gives Wal*Mart far more power over their customers than LocalMart. Piss off Amazon and WalMart and you are kind of screwed. Their rules begin to have bite. It's almost as if Monopolies are like governments with the power to enforce their will - not only their will to keep competition out, but to keep their customers in line ( whatever that is ). Don't have the wrong opinions or they might choose to stop dealing with you. Beware the social credit score

    59. Re:prefer cash by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      But if you saved money, you wouldn't have a negative balance. Who cares what a bunch of clerks think of you?

    60. Re:prefer cash by suutar · · Score: 1

      Of course it's taken from others. I believe the theory is that this kind of stuff comes out of their cut of the transaction processing fee, so it's being taken from the merchant... who may be getting it back from you by charging extra for card transactions (most common with gasoline, that I've seen).

    61. Re:prefer cash by dryeo · · Score: 1

      All prices go up to support the card transaction fees, especially if most all stores accept fees. So if I pay cash, I'm subsidizing you.
      Of course the real advantage for retailers is people spending money they don't have or can't afford to, assuming a large number of people using cards are not paying it off every month. Something I'm not sure is in the best interests of society as the average household has quite a bit of debt.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    62. Re:prefer cash by Malizar · · Score: 1

      That "free" money is charged to the vendor who processed the credit card, so the vendor raises prices to cover the extra expense. You are paying yourself, and others, and considering it to be "free" money.

    63. Re: prefer cash by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      If a credit card is stolen it can be cancelled quickly and any fraudelent purchases dispuated with a cap on damage, the credit card company will take absorb the damage. With a debit card you don't have such protections usually

      The protections on a debit card depend on the institution that issues it. My credit union has the same protections for their debit cards as a standard credit card. The only difference is that your account is short the money you dispute until it is put back, where you don't pay the disputed amount for a CC.

      There's an additional issue that using a credit card will help you build up a good credit score

      Some of us are old enough we already have a credit score.

    64. Re:prefer cash by terrycarlino · · Score: 2

      It's all very well that many of us use a mixture of cash, credit and debit cards, and there are many good reasons to want to use cash, including surveillance, but one issue is that some people must pay a premium to not use cash. And often they are the people who can least afford to lose money to fees.

      We've covered this before. In the U.S. banks are not required to do business with anyone. They can decide they don't want to do business with you. This includes Visa and Mastercharge (who by the way have been banning individuals based on their views and not their financials.)

      Most often banks will require a minimum amount to open an account. And require it sit unused for some period of time. Poor people often don't have enough money to meet these requirements. So they can't get a check account. That means no debit card. If they have bad or no credit they can't get a credit card. They must pay a fee for pre-paid cards.

      Having only cash becomes a barrier to entry. Certain neighborhoods already have problems with a lack of stores, particularly grocery stores. If stores around these neighborhoods won't take cash that makes the problem even worse.

    65. Re:prefer cash by terrycarlino · · Score: 1

      It's more likely to be the government. There is already a place where this happens. If you have money in a retirement fund when you reach a certain age you must start drawing that money even if you don't need to so that the government can start collecting taxes on it. You are basically penalized for having enough retirement income not to have to draw some arbitrary amount from your accounts, just so they government can force you to start paying taxes on it.

    66. Re:prefer cash by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      Are EFTPOS transactions in Australia itemized? I.e. do the bankscum know that you made a purchase of $52 from the grocery store last Wednesday, or do they know that you spent $5 on crisps, $10 on fruit, $20 on beer, etc, etc, etc?

    67. Re: prefer cash by reanjr · · Score: 1

      Yes, stores commonly charge debit fees in many places. Yes, you have an opportunity to cancel beforehand. So what? The point is in many places debit cards regularly incur fees at P.O.S.

    68. Re: prefer cash by reanjr · · Score: 1

      And no, it does not depend on where you bank. It depends on where you shop. As I initially stated to your abject skepticism, there fees are charged by the merchant at P.O.S., not by your bank.

    69. Re: prefer cash by reanjr · · Score: 1

      Yeah, KYC laws aren't going anywhere. We'll drop murder as a crime before we drop money laundering.

    70. Re:prefer cash by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

      It's all very well that many of us use a mixture of cash, credit and debit cards, ...

      If you have a CC then there's no need/reason to use or even have a Debit card.

      I would also argue that Debit cards are a bad idea as they're directly linked to your bank account. Sure they seem to offer protections similar to a CC, but if it's used fraudulently you have to ask to get your money back with a Debit card (and to rectify anything that went wrong with your account in the interim), rather than simply disputing and not paying for the disputed items as with a credit card. Simply put, a credit card is safer than a debit card.

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    71. Re: prefer cash by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Any additional fees the merchant charges must be the first message the customer sees when they are handed the machine, and the customer has to acknowledge that amount, essentially like a tip where the dollar value of the tip is precalculated. The combined total is then displayed and the customer again has to approve that total amount before their PIN is entered. Any fees the merchant charges cannot be hidden, unlike a regular banking fee. Independently run ATM's that charge a fee to dispense cash are required to do the same thing. In both cases, at least in my experience, it is not too inconvenient to avoid these fees by simply spending a small amount of extra effort to use alternative facilities that do not charge them.

    72. Re: prefer cash by jpaine619 · · Score: 1

      If a credit card is stolen it can be cancelled quickly and any fraudelent purchases dispuated with a cap on damage, the credit card company will take absorb the damage..

      Absolute horse shit... The card company takes ZERO damages. The fraudulent funds are pulled back out of the merchant's account. Visa/MC aren't on the hook for anything, unless they can't get the money back from the merchant.. Only then do they pony up cash.. I have a merchant account and the TOS are quite clear that I'm responsible for ensuring that a card is used only by the authorized person.

      I had a customer dispute a charge (short story: the bank was in error and double processed her card, not I) and within a few moments of her calling her issuing bank the funds were pulled back out of my account.. Took me 3 months to prove that I had a right to that money.. I got it back eventually, but it was a giant pain-in-the-ass.

    73. Re:prefer cash by jpaine619 · · Score: 1

      And when someone fucks up and puts a name into "the computer" with a spelling error and the computer matches it to you, you'll be singing a different tune. You can't freeze cash..

      Many millennials are morons. Just because shit hasn't happened to you yet, doesn't mean it can't/won't... I use a card, but you can bet your ass I have an emergency stack of cash...

    74. Re: prefer cash by jpaine619 · · Score: 1

      2. Write to bank instructing them to immediately halt all sharing of your data with these organisations as is your legal right under Article 18 of the EU GDPR. https://gdpr-info.eu/art-18-gd...

      Kinda funny you post a direct link to the document and yet it's clear you either haven't read it or don't possess an adult level of reading comprehension.

      I read it and it's quite clear that as long as the data is accurate, necessary for the collector to conduct business, and not illegally obtained, they can tell you to go suck a bag of dicks.

      There are all sorts of reasons your bank might need to share data with a 3rd party. Credit reporting, collections, etc... Your desire to block that apparently isn't always supreme.

      I'll grant you that the EU does seem to be way more concerned with the privacy of it's citizens, at least on an economic level, but it would appear that right is not paramount to all valid reasons.

      I'd further wager that if EU companies begin to suffer under the restrictions you do have, they'll be relaxed the moment it becomes clear the EU might slip in global trade.. Nobody wants to see their wealth being drained (well, besides the US obviously as we just can't seem to send enough cash to China) and nobody wants to dive into a recession. The more onerous (even if just) your laws and red tape become, the harder it is for companies to compete with low cost alternatives.

      Economics and social policies tend to act a bit like a pendulum swinging back and forth until some reasonable middle ground is reached. But even that stability is usually short lived as times change and economic/global crises come and go.

      The GDPR is a relatively new policy and nobody is sure what the total ramifications are yet. I'd be a little less cocky about it...

    75. Re:prefer cash by jpaine619 · · Score: 1

      We could fix this. Stored value cards already exist, you can top them up with cash.

      And just how the fuck are you going to do that in a cashless society? The whole point of this article is about millenials not using cash...

    76. Re:prefer cash by jpaine619 · · Score: 1

      What? In many states you can buy prepaid VISA cards at the 7-11 in denominations up to $500.. Nobody is pulling any IDs..

  2. cashless transactions == tax on stupidity by OrangeTide · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There is always a middle man taking a cut of an electronic transaction. I don't understand why people insist that the way of the future is to fork over a few percent of your income to credit card companies.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    1. Re: cashless transactions == tax on stupidity by niftydude · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The people insisting on it and claiming it will be inevitable are the people profiting from it. If enough sock puppets and talking heads move public opinion such that it seems like a foregone conclusion, then people will be more likely to sleep walk into the brave new world of zero privacy and nickel and diming of every purchase.

      --
      You can never know everything, and part of what you do know will always be wrong. Perhaps even the most important part.
    2. Re:cashless transactions == tax on stupidity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There is always a middle man taking a cut of an electronic transaction. I don't understand why people insist that the way of the future is to fork over a few percent of your income to credit card companies.

      There is a cost to the merchant for handling cash - theft, counting, transportation, bank deposits/withdrawals, etc.

      Do cash handling costs add up to what the merchant pays to accept credit cards? I suspect not (but I don't work in retail).

      But I strongly suspect cash handling costs are much more than what the merchant pays to accept debit card payments.

    3. Re: cashless transactions == tax on stupidity by niftydude · · Score: 2

      He's not wrong. Time is money, and time a business owner has to spend (either his or an employee's) to go to the bank and deposit the day's take, or withdraw rolls or change has a cost.

      --
      You can never know everything, and part of what you do know will always be wrong. Perhaps even the most important part.
    4. Re:cashless transactions == tax on stupidity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There is always a middle man taking a cut of an electronic transaction. I don't understand why people insist that the way of the future is to fork over a few percent of your income to credit card companies.

      You don't understand why people don't like making daily/weekly trips to their bank?
      Do you not travel?
      Never had to deal with a shortage in a register?
      On the phone with a client that owes you money and expect them to show up at your office with cash?
      I mean you can't understand why people don't like knocking on doors asking for payment?

      Electronic payments have solved SOOOOO many problems. For all their warts they're still better than ATM fees, bounced checks, check cashing fees, etc. IDK where you get % of your income to credit card companies from, they make more money off interchange than interest - which is zero when you pay your balance each month. Credit card companies are the banks... literally they are. They’ve always been the middle man unless you take cash from your employer straight to the mattress. They're generally for-profit, and even when not someone is paying for those branch offices, "free" tellers and in-network ATMs. If you don't like the amount of fees paid to the banking/payment industry OK, but middlemen? Hellooooooooo...

    5. Re: cashless transactions == tax on stupidity by Krishnoid · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Foregone conclusion? Sleep walk? The millenials are born into a digital world where a cell phone gives them more reach than anything the previous generation had at their age. This isn't something they need to be convinced to accept -- it's reality from day one.

      By the next generation, anyone who didn't have some digital dirt in their childhood may just be treated as a late bloomer or someone who lost their virginity later in life, not much beyond something of a curiosity.

    6. Re:cashless transactions == tax on stupidity by OrangeTide · · Score: 2

      You don't understand why people don't like making daily/weekly trips to their bank?

      Maybe we need something like Doordash except for cash. Or perhaps little boxes sprinkled all over the city that let you withdraw from your bank account, like some kind of automatic bank teller but as a machine?

      Do you not travel?

      Not everyday, no. I usually only travel for business or pleasure.

      On the phone with a client that owes you money and expect them to show up at your office with cash?

      I've mailed out about 60 checks this year. I've been getting a lot of construction done on my house and that's how the contractors get paid.

      Never had to deal with a shortage in a register?

      Or chargebacks. Or a down processing network.

      I mean you can't understand why people don't like knocking on doors asking for payment>

      I had no idea that the state of the U.S. Postal Service has gotten to this point. Stamps are what, like $8 now?

      IDK where you get % of your income to credit card companies from, they make more money off interchange than interest

      Interchange fees work out to a few percent in the majority of transactions.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    7. Re:cashless transactions == tax on stupidity by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Businesses have costs for cash too. Paying a secure transport company to provide vans and guards to transport it to the banks. Losses from counterfeit currency. Losses from store employees who 'lose' some of the money from the till. Cashless payment fees are usually less than a percent - cheaper than handling cash.

    8. Re:cashless transactions == tax on stupidity by blahplusplus · · Score: 1

      There is always a middle man taking a cut of an electronic transaction. I don't understand why people insist that the way of the future is to fork over a few percent of your income to credit card companies.

      Already happened in videogames, people sleepwalked into the theft of their own software to be run on their own computers in isolation from the rest of the internet. Now even windows has drm in it. Shit is disgusting. The average person on our planet is a moron.

    9. Re:cashless transactions == tax on stupidity by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      There is always a middle man taking a cut of an electronic transaction.

      The cut for electronic transaction is smaller than the cut for cash. Cash requires sorting, counting, transporting, and takes more time at the cash register.

    10. Re:cashless transactions == tax on stupidity by DogDude · · Score: 2

      Cashless payment fees are usually less than a percent - cheaper than handling cash.

      False.
      Credit cards cost about 3%, not 1%, which is much more than the cost of handling cash.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    11. Re: cashless transactions == tax on stupidity by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      Sure, he's not 100% wrong, but he's far from right. Many merchants will charge you an additional fee to use your credit card, while cash and check run ~3% less.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    12. Re:cashless transactions == tax on stupidity by dcw3 · · Score: 2

      There is always a middle man taking a cut of an electronic transaction.

      The cut for electronic transaction is smaller than the cut for cash. Cash requires sorting, counting, transporting, and takes more time at the cash register.

      Please explain why merchants will charge you 3% more for credit transactions then.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    13. Re:cashless transactions == tax on stupidity by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      "Cash, barter or trade" has been the standard for business since time out of mind. It's part of the *cost of doing business.* Paraphrasing a movie quote, you never go full cashless.

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
    14. Re: cashless transactions == tax on stupidity by Code+Herder · · Score: 1

      For now: volume

      They still have to pay for secure cash transport, handling etc and in some places I guess (US?) the bulk is still cash.

    15. Re: cashless transactions == tax on stupidity by dwywit · · Score: 1

      And that cost is - or should be - passed on to the customer - just like card transaction fees.

      If consumers don't like "no-cash" businesses, then they'll choose to spend their money elsewhere.

      --
      They sentenced me to twenty years of boredom
    16. Re:cashless transactions == tax on stupidity by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      The world of cashless payments is much bigger than credit cards, at least in the part of the world with a modern banking system.

      I have a choice between chip & PIN, or contactless payment.

    17. Re:cashless transactions == tax on stupidity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Businesses have costs for cash too. Paying a secure transport company to provide vans and guards to transport it to the banks. Losses from counterfeit currency. Losses from store employees who 'lose' some of the money from the till. Cashless payment fees are usually less than a percent - cheaper than handling cash.

      Sorry, cashless payments run 1- 10% of the transaction, plus and transaction fee as well as statement fees, not to mention the cost / rental fees associated with the terminals.

    18. Re:cashless transactions == tax on stupidity by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Because one doesn't follow the other. Cashless != Credit Card, and I don't fork over anything (both directly in fees, or indirectly in product costs) much less a "few percent of my income".

      Cashless economies do not list Credit Cards as the alternatives. We use debit cards, direct debit transactions, custom bank based payment methods, and for some rare cases, crypto currencies.

    19. Re:cashless transactions == tax on stupidity by nasch · · Score: 1

      I don't understand why people insist that the way of the future is to fork over a few percent of your income to credit card companies.

      The merchant pays that fee, not you. Either they pass it on to all their customers in pricing or eat it, so whether you use cash or card makes no difference to how much you pay.

      I assume by "your income" you mean the income of the buyer, not the income of the merchant. Obviously there are good reasons to accept credit and debit cards as a merchant.

    20. Re: cashless transactions == tax on stupidity by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      No, the credit card companies charge them that much, and they pass it along. Many businesses have a very small profit margin, where even a percentage point makes the difference between a profitable exchange and one that isn't. Does this 3% disappear in places that have gone cashless? If so, how are the financial institutions making money on the transactions, because you know they're pushing for this.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    21. Re: cashless transactions == tax on stupidity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You obviously have never run or patronized a small business. Cost to do business with cashless systems is a minimum of 3%, by the time you buy the terminals (or rent them) it's closer to 4.5-5 (unless it's an iPad with Square, then it's more like 7%). Cash is less than a half of a percent in labor to deal with.

      Nearly a third of the small businesses I deal with on a regular basis only accept cash, it keeps prices down.
      FWIW, this is in New York- not some third world craphole.

    22. Re:cashless transactions == tax on stupidity by Drethon · · Score: 1

      I don't understand why people insist that the way of the future is to fork over a few percent of your income to credit card companies.

      The merchant pays that fee, not you. Either they pass it on to all their customers in pricing or eat it, so whether you use cash or card makes no difference to how much you pay.

      I assume by "your income" you mean the income of the buyer, not the income of the merchant. Obviously there are good reasons to accept credit and debit cards as a merchant.

      Plus I doubt many merchants "eat it", I'm pretty sure they all set prices to account for credit card fees, including prices paid by cash customers (though one of our family run businesses started passing the fee on to CC users, which is fine with me as I pay them cash to help them out). So I suspect everyone gets to deal with the CC fees, except those getting cash back get a small portion of the fees back...

    23. Re:cashless transactions == tax on stupidity by nasch · · Score: 1

      Yeah there are a few businesses with a lower cash price, but that's pretty unusual in my experience.

    24. Re:cashless transactions == tax on stupidity by pr0fessor · · Score: 1

      It's not the future, it's the pipe dream of those who hope to get those extra few percent of your income and sell your shopping habit data for a little more. The thing is there are still plenty of people making private transactions that they can't get a percentage of or track and that is going to continue to happen for a very long time.

    25. Re:cashless transactions == tax on stupidity by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Cash costs more to handle than credit cards for many retailers. As well as slowing down transactions, mistakes are inevitable, it has to be counted, it has to be taken to the bank, and there has to be enough of a float in every till to provide change.

      Most of the places that charge you less for cash are not putting it through the books so they can avoid paying sales tax, or are selling high value products where the percentage becomes significant such as airlines.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    26. Re:cashless transactions == tax on stupidity by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      About 50% of gas stations on this side of the pond charge 10-20c less per gallon for cash payments. That said, I suspect the reasoning is as much about getting customers to walk into the store, where they might be tempted to buy something (which is where the real money is made) as it is to save money on credit card transaction fees.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    27. Re: cashless transactions == tax on stupidity by reanjr · · Score: 1

      The problem is the legal lockdown and network effects that force businesses into otherwise undesired contractural obligations on their pricing.

      In most places, one must offer Visa or MC or go out of business. And if I accept Visa or MC, I must also accept that Visa or MC has some say over how I price my goods. I cannot pass on the cost to the appropriate customer. I must instead pass it on to all my customers.

      So, your theory of consumer behavior breaks down in the face of economic and legislative reality.

    28. Re:cashless transactions == tax on stupidity by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      But I strongly suspect cash handling costs are much more than what the merchant pays to accept debit card payments.

      Most gas stations aren't allowed to assess a surcharge for credit cards, but they CAN give a discount for cash. (Some gas stations ARE allowed to assess a credit surcharge, but that practice is prevented by some states.) That's why the default price is the credit price, and why there's a cash discount, it's actually a matter of law. The retailers have no motivation to argue against this, of course, because they make more money on the non-cash debit card sales.

      However, as a customer, you should never use a non-credit-type debit card to make purchases anywhere, because those cards lack the strong purchase protection which is offered by credit cards. It's okay to make a Visa or Mastercard "debit card" purchase, but never make a Plus or Pulse debit card purchase. You can't trivially have those charges reversed like you can with the credit card-processor-backed ones.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    29. Re:cashless transactions == tax on stupidity by ISayWeOnlyToBePolite · · Score: 1

      Cashless payment fees are usually less than a percent - cheaper than handling cash.

      False.

      Credit cards cost about 3%, not 1%, which is much more than the cost of handling cash.

      That depends on where in the world you are. Looking at Sweden (which afaik has one of the highest rate of debit/credit card vs cash usage in the world) you can get (I browsed the arbitrarily chosen 5000 transactions/month) less than $10 fixed monthly fee, 0.64% for debit, 1.085% for credit with an additional $0.08 fee per transaction. These are list prices, finding out the cost of handling cash is more difficult, but from what I heard it's usually about 3-5% (direct costs only). If you want to continue using cash you'll need legislation or get used to paying for the privilege directly at the till, the difference in cost is simply not long term sustainable.

    30. Re:cashless transactions == tax on stupidity by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      Because, friend OrangeTide, the current prevailing business models all boil down to pay, Pay, PAY endlessly. Corporations (The Rich, really) want to remake the world into a place where only They get to own things, and everyone else only rents them. So of course they want you to 'rent' your own money you earn, by taking some of it when you try to spend it. Can't do that if you have nasty-old physical cash, now can they?
      Also they want to be able to track every single dollar you spend, know where it came from and where it goes, which goes in your Very Personal Profile, so they can target more and more ads at you, so you'll buy more things, so they get more fees, and more data, and so on, and so on.
      Governments of course will love a cashless world, because when you can't spend a single dollar without announcing your precise location, it's about as good as GPS for tracking individual citizens' whereabouts.

      Needless to say we must fight against this 'cashless' bullshit tooth and nail.

    31. Re:cashless transactions == tax on stupidity by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing DogDude is in the US. Chip&Pin is much rarer there, and credit cards are favored over debit cards.

    32. Re:cashless transactions == tax on stupidity by anegg · · Score: 1

      Cash costs more to handle than credit cards for many retailers. As well as slowing down transactions, mistakes are inevitable, it has to be counted, it has to be taken to the bank, and there has to be enough of a float in every till to provide change.

      Easily proven false. Although fewer places do it now, it used to be fairly common to get a "cash discount." I have never been offered a discount for using credit. Although credit card transactions have gotten speedier now that signatures aren't required, they aren't substantially faster than cash with an experienced cashier and/or change dispenser. And those "no signature" transactions carry increased risk of fraudulent transactions, the cost of which is buried in the transaction fees charged the merchants, who add it to the cost of goods/services sold.

    33. Re:cashless transactions == tax on stupidity by DogDude · · Score: 1

      Looking at Sweden

      Sweden has banking and finance regulations. The US, largely doesn't. In the US, it costs 3-4% to take credit cards, and that number isn't going down unless there's some real legislation passed. That'll happen just as soon as donkeys fly.

      , but from what I heard it's usually about 3-5% (direct costs only)

      That's a wildly incorrect number. It costs $30-$50 to count up $1000 in cash and deposit it in a bank? That doesn't even pass the smell test. If it costs a business that much money to deal with cash, they're simply incompetent.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    34. Re:cashless transactions == tax on stupidity by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      Hahaha, i'll bet they love you.

      The general contractor specifically ask that I pay by check for record keeping purposes. The nice thing is I can go online and review pictures of my checks, and note what is outstanding in my check register.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    35. Re:cashless transactions == tax on stupidity by phalse+phace · · Score: 1

      But I strongly suspect cash handling costs are much more than what the merchant pays to accept debit card payments.

      Then why do fueling stations offer cash discounts? Cash payment gets you between $0.10 and $0.20 off per gallon vs credit card payment.

    36. Re: cashless transactions == tax on stupidity by MooseTick · · Score: 1

      "Let's assume they make $100,000 a year"

      Yes, handling cash has a cost that isn't insignificant. That said, people that make $100k in retail do not make bank runs. And if they do, they are salaried and its just part of the job.

    37. Re: cashless transactions == tax on stupidity by tepples · · Score: 1

      If consumers don't like "no-cash" businesses, then they'll choose to spend their money elsewhere.

      The problem comes with no-cash government or when all businesses in a particular class that serve a particular area all go no-cash.

    38. Re:cashless transactions == tax on stupidity by tepples · · Score: 1

      The world of cashless payments is much bigger than credit cards

      Perhaps in the "world". But Slashdot's headquarters is in the USA, and the USA of cashless payments is Visa and MasterCard, with some stores also offering Discover and American Express. I haven't seen more than a handful of chains that accept Interlink and Maestro debit cards but not Visa and MasterCard credit cards.

    39. Re:cashless transactions == tax on stupidity by tepples · · Score: 1

      Cashless economies do not list Credit Cards as the alternatives. We use debit cards

      In the USA, it's a distinction without a difference, as debit cards carry the same Visa and MasterCard logos as credit cards. I can't name a single brick and mortar business near me that accepts debit cards but not credit cards.

    40. Re:cashless transactions == tax on stupidity by tepples · · Score: 1

      Or perhaps little boxes sprinkled all over the city that let you withdraw from your bank account, like some kind of automatic bank teller but as a machine?

      For a nominal $4 fee per withdrawal: $2 to your bank and $2 to the owner of the ATM. Your bank offers a fee-free ATM, but it's across town, and you need to spend a half hour on your bike each way to get there and back.

      Interchange fees work out to a few percent in the majority of transactions.

      A few percent plus 30 cents. When paying for a $1 diet soda, the 30 cents dominate.

    41. Re:cashless transactions == tax on stupidity by smoot123 · · Score: 1

      don't understand why people insist that the way of the future is to fork over a few percent of your income to credit card companies.

      Very few vendors seem to charge extra for using plastic. Gas stations seem to be the only ones I bump into. Given I'm paying the same price either way, I'll use more-convenient plastic.

    42. Re:cashless transactions == tax on stupidity by bigtech · · Score: 1

      When you buy $100 worth of goods with a credit card, you receive $100 worth of goods. You pay nothing. The vendor, however, receives $97. For me, it's all upside -- credit cards are convenient, offer fraud protection and often have benefit programs that I like.

  3. Millennials Will Live To See a Cashless World... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ...you poor bastards. Hope you enjoy total surveillance.

  4. Sure... but that's only because Earth's temperature is going to increase exponentially, and soon it'll be too hot to print money anymore. Thank god I'm old and won't be around much fucking longer anyway. I don't envy them. Good luck, kids... that's all I'm saying.

    --
    Our reign has gone on long enough. Indeed. Summon the meteors.
  5. The end of private spending by golgotha007 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's also important to note that governments want this, too. They used to just have visibility on big number transactions but once all cash is gone, they'll be able to monitor every transaction, no matter how small. The concept of anonymous transactions and spending privacy will be soon be over.

    1. Re:The end of private spending by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There are many times I will pay cash for things just because I know the merchant is going to slip the money in their pocket and not declare it to the government. It disgusts me the way the government wastes our tax money, so better in the hands of a small business person who is contributing a lot more to society.

      I also try to use cash at big stores (even though they pay their taxes) because the amount of data they can access about you just using your credit card info as a search index is terrifying.

    2. Re:The end of private spending by Dan+East · · Score: 1

      Yes, and they will tax EVERYTHING. The reason that private sales of used vehicles are taxed is because.... they know when the purchases happen because you have to title the vehicle with the government. So they ask you what you paid for it, and if the number you give them is too low then they use some market value for the vehicle year and mileage instead. I've always felt this is fundamentally against our rights as citizens as the vehicle was already taxed when it was sold new. A given vehicle could be taxed a dozen times if it was sold a dozen times. That is wrong.

      The one and only reason the government does not tax every private sale that occurs is because they have no way of knowing when they occur. Yesterday we bought a used pair of soccer cleats off a friend for $8 for our son to play soccer this season. They will tax that too when they can track that the money has been moved.

      This should scare the hell out of everyone.

      --
      Better known as 318230.
    3. Re:The end of private spending by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      Lucky you don't live here in Virginia where they tax your vehicle every damn year based upon the NADA value at 4.13%. This causes a large portion of the population to cheat with out of state tags. It also causes another large percentage to keep really old, highly polluting vehicles because they've been around long enough to no longer get taxed.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    4. Re:The end of private spending by pr0fessor · · Score: 1

      Most states have vehicle sales tax and registration fees going to pay for their roads however the property tax on my home is for the public schools to bad I can't get a discount on those taxes for not having school age kids and as much as I pay the school system is still wanting.

      It's the private transactions like what you described and those for illegal goods that will keep cash around.

      If one day cash was suddenly gone and everything had to be done by traceable card transactions the civil upset would likely tear the country apart with in a year.

    5. Re: The end of private spending by reanjr · · Score: 1

      Public school taxes aren't to educate your kids. They are to fund an educated society. You are receiving that benefit as much as any of your neighbors.

    6. Re:The end of private spending by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      It won't 'soon be over' if everyone fights against it tooth and nail instead of just being passive sheep and accepting it.

    7. Re:The end of private spending by golgotha007 · · Score: 1

      Being an advocate of digital, sovereign assets through crypto is a good start.

    8. Re:The end of private spending by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      No, sorry, I can't agree with that, not when at least 50% of all so-called 'cryptocurrency' is used for illegal things, and especially not when cryptocurrency exchanges are getting hacked into and drained practically daily, and by the way how is using cryptocurrency any different than paying for everything in U.S. currency electronically? It's really not, and even if you say it's not 'traceable' right now, it will be traceable as soon as the government can arrange that. No thanks, I like physical cash.

    9. Re:The end of private spending by AndrewFlagg · · Score: 1

      its good to go into a grocery or convenience store, pay with cash and buy a gallon of ice cream or really good chocolate candy bar. go home. eat it, and not have your life insurance company or medical insurance cancelled the following day, week or month for frivolous buying and consumption. okay, okay, i digress, maybe 10 gallons of ice cream in a year.

    10. Re:The end of private spending by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      Fuck off. I saw bitcoin as just a dumb fad and then as a tool for criminals and that's what it's turning out to be. Won't last, will get regulated by governments, transactions made traceable, just like all other financial transactions. Meanwhile you dumb asses are losing your shirts because it fluxuates even worse than the stock exchange. Screw that you can all be dumb all you want I'll have none of it.

    11. Re:The end of private spending by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      I think I understand quite enough.

  6. When you make the transaction frictionless.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Reminds me of the following Ted talk - when you make the transaction frictionless, they've found you spend more

    When money isn’t real: the $10,000 experiment | Adam Carroll | TEDxLondonBusinessSchool

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_VB39Jo8mAQ

    1. Re:When you make the transaction frictionless.... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 2

      Exactly -- spending money SHOULD hurt like fuck. That way, people spend less money on frivolous shit they don't need anyway. Resist, drop out, buy used on Craigslist. Become part of the average perpetual-growth ecahhhhnamist's worst nightmares.

    2. Re:When you make the transaction frictionless.... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      What if you just want minor comfort? Buy a few duplex homes, pay them off ASAP, have someone else (tenants) paying your property taxes, health insurance, and basic needs. Not everyone's definition of success is extreme wealth -- some people just want to be left the hell alone and not be beholden to an employer.

  7. The cashless society is a mistake by Petersko · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The cashless society is only of interest to that portion of the population with absolutely nothing to hide. And I donâ(TM)t trust those people even a little bit.

    No way to buy some mushrooms or hash... no hiding your hotel tryst from your spouse... no way to hide your alcohol abuse from your insurance company... if there isnâ(TM)t something you want to hide from prying eyes youâ(TM)re living life wrong.

    1. Re:The cashless society is a mistake by Krishnoid · · Score: 1

      Or the ones that do have something to hide -- but where the inconvenience of hiding purchases outweighs its benefit.

    2. Re:The cashless society is a mistake by sfcat · · Score: 1

      The cashless society is only of interest to that portion of the population with absolutely nothing to hide. And I donâ(TM)t trust those people even a little bit.

      No way to buy some mushrooms or hash... no hiding your hotel tryst from your spouse... no way to hide your alcohol abuse from your insurance company... if there isnâ(TM)t something you want to hide from prying eyes youâ(TM)re living life wrong.

      "If you give me six lines written by the hand of the most honest of men, I will find something in them which will hang him." -- Cardinal Richelieu

      --
      "Those that start by burning books, will end by burning men."
    3. Re:The cashless society is a mistake by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      And I donâ(TM)t trust those people even a little bit.

      Funny, that's precisely what they say about people paying cash. What are you hiding? "I don't trust you since you're clearly doing drugs and dodging taxes, otherwise you wouldn't be paying cash."

      Side note: The only time these days I actually use cash is to pay a labourer who doesn't want to do the job on the books ...

    4. Re:The cashless society is a mistake by golgotha007 · · Score: 1

      Saying that you don't care about privacy because you have nothing to hide is like saying that you don't care about freedom of speech because you have nothing to say.

    5. Re:The cashless society is a mistake by MooseTick · · Score: 1

      "No way to buy some mushrooms or hash... no hiding your hotel tryst from your spouse... no way to hide your alcohol abuse from your insurance company"

      People will always want to hide some aspect of their life. That goes all the way to the top. That makes me feel relatively safe since nearly all politicians will want to keep that option open forever.

  8. World View by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Everyone only sees the world they want to see. I became a landlord a few years ago. It opened my eyes to the amount and types of people who don't or can't get debit or credit cards and that's ignoring all of the people who can't handling having a credit line. I would have otherwise never learned this type of information about people and would have continually falsely believed people had access to the same resources I had. How many random people do you go around asking about their financial history?

    The metric they're measuring is total cash transactions. That's doesn't include enough information to be useful. Is that 30% of the population only using cash or 1% only using cash and 29% sometimes using it? Perhaps that 70% are only buying a couple things at a time over and over where as the 30% cash purchases are buying two weeks worth of items at a time. Perhaps the majority of the cashless transaction are in cities. Etc... People will fill in the missing details with whatever they prefer to assume which makes all further claims dangerous to make decisions on.

    Personally I use cash at toll booths, bi-weekly on Craigslist, paying a friend / splitting costs, when the card readers aren't working, and when any total ends up matching an exact bill such as a $20. And sometimes I randomly pay in two dollar bills to screw with people.

  9. Not all millennials by SoundGuyNoise · · Score: 1

    What about all the same aged millennials who will still be under the poverty line, and will still be underserved by banks and credit card companies?
    Can't believe I'm saying this, but: check your privilege.

    --
    You never expect irony, do you?
    Want to be a professional wrestler? Visit www.iyfwrestling.com
    @iyfwrestling
    1. Re:Not all millennials by Voyager529 · · Score: 1

      Can't believe I'm saying this, but: check your privilege.

      Cash might be approaching an inflection point, but even the Boomers haven't paid with a check at retail since the Clinton administration.

    2. Re:Not all millennials by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      check your privilege

      Well, you won't be able to cash it anyway, so...

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    3. Re:Not all millennials by jythie · · Score: 1

      Yeah.. the original piece is confusing hundreds of millions of people across a wide geographic area with a wide range of life situations with 'their friends'.

    4. Re:Not all millennials by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      There are plenty of merchants out there that charge 3% additional for credit. Off the top of my head, I have a storage unit, property taxes, and a lawn service that I pay through checks in order not to pay the extra charge. I had a plumber at my home just last week tell me it would be 3% extra for credit...check it was. Up through 2013, when my daughter was still in college, they wouldn't take VISA because of the extra fee. Does anyone pay a babysitter electronically?

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    5. Re:Not all millennials by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      Boomer here, you're talking out your ass.

  10. Depends on how you define "world" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I really like remote places. I have been to a lot of them (Pitcairn Island, Cape Horn, the Austral Islands of French Polynesia, Palmyra Atoll, the Cook islands, etc.)

    There are still a lot of places that don't have cell service. The Internet (where it is available) can be very spotty. Sites like "microsoft.com" and "google.com" cannot be reliably located online (DNS errors.)

    These places deal in cold, hard cash.

    I did a deal in Uruguay that involved tens of thousands of dollars. The deal was all cash. Each side counted out hundred dollar bills in $1000 increments and grouped them in stacks of $10,000. All the money got counted twice. The transaction was completely legal. The U.S. $100 dollar bill is the genuine coin of the realm in Uruguay and Argentina. I don't care who you are, nobody is going to trust your smart phone for much over -maybe- $1000,

    I brought back (and declared) piles of hundred dollar bills through U.S. customs. The scrutiny was intense. But I got to keep my money.

    As far as the article goes, yeah, in metropolitan first world areas cash is less and less useful.

    Just as an aside, another remote place I like is Death Valley in California. Too bad every year somebody dies because they think that their smart phone will save them when they have gone too far into the back country unprepared. But...hey...at least they didn't need cash!

    1. Re:Depends on how you define "world" by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Even in urban areas you need cash. Only in hipster areas do they accept phone payments. Other places certainly take credit or debit cards but cash is more convenient and easier to budget with.

    2. Re:Depends on how you define "world" by Khashishi · · Score: 1

      What do you need cash for in urban areas other than paying your dealer and buying something from someone you found on craigslist?

    3. Re:Depends on how you define "world" by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      When I grew up the rule of thumb (and sometimes store policy) was no credit cards for anything under $20. So fast food restaurants, ice cream stores, a quick run to the drug store. If you balance your accounts, or try to keep a budget, getting paperwork for each and every misc purchase is a lot of work.

    4. Re:Depends on how you define "world" by nealric · · Score: 1

      Really? I find cash much harder to budget with. With electronic payments, what I spent money on is immediately logged into my statement. I can pull up and see how much I spent on groceries, or fuel, or whatever rather than just knowing I spent $XX.

  11. Re:Sweden.. by Darinbob · · Score: 1

    Sad story.

  12. Cashless comes with an additional 5% Bank TAX by tanstaaf1 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Talk about what the banks don't want you to even think about: Use of Credit and Debit cards adds an enormous additional cost to the merchant and, ultimately, to the consumer -- usually just shy of 5%. The conversion to cashless isn't being done to help the citizen, that is for sure. Help the consumer out of their money and their privacy? Of course. Control the consumer? Absolutely. And the dumber than dumb Millennial generation can't put two brain cells together to figure it out. Cui bono?

    1. Re:Cashless comes with an additional 5% Bank TAX by Khashishi · · Score: 1

      Well, that 20 cents can come out to more than 5% for a $4 purchase.

    2. Re:Cashless comes with an additional 5% Bank TAX by Orphis · · Score: 1

      If a merchant is paying 5%, then they should change payment processor.
      I help some small association from time to time, we have a card reader and the entry level fee is only 1.85%. It's probably lowered if you have high volumes of payments too.

      And that's 1.85% to get all the services, including getting a certified "cash" register for the tax agencies in the country. No real cash in there, but that's the terminology of payment devices, even if it's just a small add-on to a phone.

    3. Re:Cashless comes with an additional 5% Bank TAX by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Use of Credit and Debit cards adds an enormous additional cost to the merchant and, ultimately, to the consumer -- usually just shy of 5%.

      No. Use of credit cards add 5%. Use of debit cards add almost nothing. Abolishing cash on the other hand saves a shitton. You don't think handling, counting, trips to the bank, float management, safety, and security come for free do you?

      There's a reason that *businesses* are the ones pushing to go cashless and it's not because they like paying fees.

    4. Re:Cashless comes with an additional 5% Bank TAX by tepples · · Score: 1

      If a merchant is paying 5%, then they should change payment processor.
      I help some small association from time to time, we have a card reader and the entry level fee is only 1.85%.

      Plus how much per transaction? I ask on behalf of merchants that do most of their business in transactions under $10.

  13. "But for how long?" by sheramil · · Score: 1

    As long as drug dealers want to avoid having to explain all those five hundred dollar transactions done between 2:00 am and 5:00 am.

  14. Smug by hedge00 · · Score: 2

    Why does this columnist seem so damn smug about the prospect of losing a convenient payment option that has no middleman taking a cut?

    1. Re:Smug by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      Probably a shill for the financial industry.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
  15. Prediction fail by Kohath · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Here's how you predict things correctly:

    1. Start with things as they are
    2. Predict they will change only a little.

    That's how you get correct predictions. Nobody wants to publish them though.

    The big changes that would be interesting enough to publish in an article are too few. You won't guess them.

    1. Re:Prediction fail by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I'll bite:

      1. Start with things as they are

      A portion of stores I do business with are cashless.
      I haven't carried cash on me in years.
      All supermarkets I go to have cash free lanes with the option of a few select slow lines where I pay cash.
      I transfer money and split bills between my friends with my phone.
      I am a millennial.

      2. Predict they will change only a little.

      Abolishing the few remaining cash lanes changes things a little.
      The remaining businesses not already cashless going cashless changes things a little.
      I will remain a millennial so that doesn't change.

      Sounds like a pretty solid and realistic prediction to me, I'm less than a quarter in to my life and I've seen the world shift in very dramatic ways to cashless transactions to the point where finding a business that doesn't support cashless transactions (including small stuff like buying a coffee from a food van standing outside a festival) is an incredibly oddity. It stands to reason that cash will disappear from this world before I do (accidents or sudden medical interventions not withstanding).

    2. Re:Prediction fail by Kohath · · Score: 1

      A portion of stores I do business with are cashless. ...
      All supermarkets I go to have cash free lanes with the option of a few select slow lines where I pay cash.

      What country? Not the US.

    3. Re:Prediction fail by tepples · · Score: 1

      I transfer money and split bills between my friends with my phone.

      How much does use of your phone away from home and open hotspots cost you per month? How much does use of the current account (also called a checking account or demand deposit account) cost you per month?

      I've seen the world shift in very dramatic ways to cashless transactions to the point where finding a business that doesn't support cashless transactions (including small stuff like buying a coffee from a food van standing outside a festival) is an incredibly oddity.

      The price of the coffee probably already shot up to cover the fee of 30 cents per transaction that the bank charges to process credit or debit transactions.

  16. Crashless society by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Let's see you buy an 8-ball of crystal meth with a credit card or Apple Pay. You think Robert Kraft is slapping down his Discover Card when he goes to the Chinese rub'n'tug to get his egg roll dipped in sweet and sour?

    Do you think that when the human trafficking owner of that Chinese rub'n'tug sells access to Donald Trump that they're taking credit card payments?

    Fuck no. There somebody, somewhere, with a wad of currency. As it will ever be.

    And no, I'm not making any of the above up:

    https://nymag.com/intelligence...

    https://www.rawstory.com/2019/...

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
    1. Re:Crashless society by Krishnoid · · Score: 1

      Obviously not. They don't take Discover -- Mastercard and Visa only. But you get a couple egg rolls free from the attached restaurant, because you're such a good customer.

    2. Re:Crashless society by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1, Troll

      Always find a way, no matter how tenuous, to link whatever the current article is to Trump. This is Trump Derangement Syndrome. -1 Offtopic.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    3. Re:Crashless society by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1, Troll

      Always find a way, no matter how tenuous, to link whatever the current article is to Trump. This is Trump Derangement Syndrome

      It's gonna be this way until that degenerate is safely out of office, so get used to it. Just relax and enjoy the ride, sweetheart.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
  17. No way by fred911 · · Score: 1

    Millennials can't buy everything they want without cash and I doubt that the intolerance precludes those purchases will leave as quickly as the availability to be 100% cashless arrives.

    --
    09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B - D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
  18. Well, they'll be comfortable with it. by Mr.+Dollar+Ton · · Score: 1

    Gen X is the last generation that remembers what it was to live disconnected, and when we die out, nobody will know better.

  19. The fun of a cashless world by AHuxley · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Your CC comes with a new political code of conduct.
    Any gov assistance program gets a new long no buy list.
    No gambling, no drugs, no alcohol, no smoking.
    A bank account will be needed.
    Detection of illegal migrants and other criminals trying to use a fake ID.
    Social media use gets linked back to a cashless account and all spending is tracked.
    Cash gave a person the spending power to enjoy freedoms away from big gov and the politics of a bank, CC. A cashless world returns all spending to a bank, CC.
    Buy the wrong book? The wrong comment on an ISP account linked to your a cashless account?

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    1. Re:The fun of a cashless world by jfdavis668 · · Score: 1

      So why are Millennials giving this all up for the convenience of cashless transactions?

    2. Re:The fun of a cashless world by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Banks and CC brands make it trendy and low cost at first to get consumers spreading the good news about the "free" cashless services offered.
      Then the banks and CC brands up the fees and costs on every movement of money once a nation is captive on their "cashless" services.
      Wage goes in? Thats a new cost.
      Shopping? Thats going to be an account cost.
      Buy a political book? Thats a review of the account and loss of an account due to a new CoC?

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  20. Cardless society by WaffleMonster · · Score: 1

    My prediction in the not too distant future the use of credit cards for transactions will be greatly diminished. Instead people will use bank tied "push" payment systems for electronic payment without transaction fees.

    Cash will still be widely used and smartphone based payment systems (Apple Pay, Samsung Pay, Google Pay, ad nausea) will be phased out entirely.

    1. Re:Cardless society by tepples · · Score: 1

      bank tied "push" payment systems for electronic payment without transaction fees.

      Who will pay for the servers, electric power, datacenter space, and network connections to keep these fee-free "push" payment systems running?

  21. DO NOT DO!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    A cashless society gives TOTAL control to government. If this happens it will be eventually be abused.The other day it became known that the Trump administration has been tracking journalists. Should Trump seize even more power, how hard it is to imagine he might freeze the assets of those journalists from "fake news" outlets as he likes to call them. Just one very easily imagined scenario where this could be abused. Next election Right Wing Christians take control? Maybe they will prevent funds from being transferred to pay for abortion. I could go on and on but the abuse is easy to imagine yourself. And that's not even considering the tracking power of a cashless society.

  22. Makes it easy to tax everything. by WolfgangVL · · Score: 1

    Finally, Uncle Sam will be getting in on all that unreported allowance action.

    --
    You are being ripped off every second of every day, so that advertisers can help rip you off even more tomorrow.
    1. Re:Makes it easy to tax everything. by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      You joke, but kids won't be able to babysit or mow lawns unless they register a company and pay taxes on the income. It's coming, just wait.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  23. Navie at Best, so Just Say No! by SemperOSS · · Score: 2

    I will give this guy the benefit of doubt and just label him naive.

    There are so many reasons for having cash, from simple convenience to privacy. I like the fact that I can literally throw money on the counter/table if I am in a hurry (has happened a few times in my life).

    Also, it will be the end of most beggars, I believe, as I cannot see them accepting card payments soon (Thank you kind Ma'am, would you like a receipt?). Similarly for sellers of The Big Issue (a UK magazine sold by homeless people). A lot of other charity will be stopped dead in its tracks when people cannot just grab some money and give it in a quick transaction. What about the big tanks in the airports where people can leave money for charities, can anybody imagine those replaced with card readers? Me neither.

    As other have said, we are walking into the ultimate surveillance society where no transaction goes unregistered, which obviously is the card companies', the tax man's, the police's, the intelligence communities' and the government's wet dream.

    Just say NO!

    --
    I don't need a signature to draw attention to myself.
    1. Re:Navie at Best, so Just Say No! by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      He's not "just" naive. He wrote an article about it for USA Today and received money for doing it. That makes him a paid shill.

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
    2. Re:Navie at Best, so Just Say No! by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      He could be naive, but I'm betting the financial industry is pushing for cashless, and would love their minions to do so as well. They'll make a percentage of the cut, along with another percentage selling off your personal data.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
  24. Back to the Future by Hairy1 · · Score: 1

    Dear United States. New Zealand has had EFTPOS for years and years. Stands for Electronic Funds Transfer at Point of Sale. It is not a credit card, in that it is attached to your bank account. Getting out cash is now quite rare. It isn't strictly cashless; we still have cash, but the overwhelming majority of point of sale transactions are performed by EFTPOS. There is a small fee to the merchant for each transaction, but not the silly percentage based approach used by the credit card people. So entrenched is EFTPOS that we have rejected the 'paywave' system which sought to undermine it and reintroduce abhorrent transaction fees just for the 'convenience' of not entering your pin number.

    1. Re:Back to the Future by will_die · · Score: 1

      With it being linked to your bank account and not globally accepted as major credit cards how do they handle tourists?

    2. Re:Back to the Future by avandesande · · Score: 1

      We have debit cards in the US the work the same way, but credit card companies have been incentivizing consumers to use their cards instead with cash back or other promotions. Our local Kroger subsidiary is no longer taking Visa in April due to high fees....

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
  25. Police will have an easy job by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As soon as "cashless" becomes a reality, police won't have to lift a finger to arrest anyone accused of a crime. They'll just turn off his phone. The suspect will turn himself in to avoid starvation.

    That's the good part of police states. Petty crime virtually disappears. The bad part is that the definition of "crime" expands so far as to encompass anyone who does something the rulers don't like. We're already seeing people being denied financial services like Paypal, Patreon, and even bank accounts simply because they speak their opinions in public. It's a new, terrifying level of control and since corporations control it instead of government, it's doing a nice job of boiling the frog.

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    1. Re:Police will have an easy job by nasch · · Score: 1

      We're already seeing people being denied financial services like Paypal, Patreon, and even bank accounts simply because they speak their opinions in public.

      Meaning specific companies have decided not to do business with a specific customer, or the government has decided that a person is not allowed to have a bank account? Because those are very different things.

    2. Re:Police will have an easy job by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 2

      If the government and businesses are working together, not that much different.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    3. Re:Police will have an easy job by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 2

      We're already seeing people being denied financial services like Paypal, Patreon, and even bank accounts simply because they speak their opinions in public.

      Meaning specific companies have decided not to do business with a specific customer, or the government has decided that a person is not allowed to have a bank account? Because those are very different things.

      "Citizen committees" with baseball bats and armed government agents are very different things too, in theory ... just not always in practice.

    4. Re:Police will have an easy job by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 2

      As soon as "cashless" becomes a reality, police won't have to lift a finger to arrest anyone accused of a crime. They'll just turn off his phone. The suspect will turn himself in to avoid starvation.

      Yes because "cashless" is an all encompassing word that not only hands police powers they don't have,

      They don't? They already freeze bank accounts.

      but also implies the specific solution to replace cash is to use a phone,

      The pocket computer than approximately everyone carries, and that people are already using for digital cash? Yeah, that's just crazy talk (and also not super relevant to his point, but whatever)

      and naturally why would you stop there when you could just add a slippery slope fallacy to properly round out your post.

      The slope we are already tobogganing down ... hitting the odd "deplatforming" tree on the way ...

    5. Re:Police will have an easy job by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      Interestingly, that's not always true that police states get rid of petty crime -- the USSR had a huge petty criminal subclass. The government just cooked their crime statistics and didn't release much information.

      Even in England under the 1800s Bloody Code, pickpocketing was common at public hangings even through theft could earn you a free Australian vacation (at best) or a rope (at worst).

    6. Re:Police will have an easy job by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2

      Mao's China pretty much eliminated crime. That legacy continues today; China is one of the safest countries on the planet. They're installing face recognition cameras everywhere to ensure this stays. The new police state will be unlike anything the world has ever seen; it will have the capability to watch everyone, all the time. Anyone who goes off the grid will be immediately suspicious. Being able to escape surveillance will be a great privilege, held only by our rulers and as a reward for their helpers.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    7. Re:Police will have an easy job by tepples · · Score: 1

      If all banks in a particular city "have decided not to do business with a specific customer" living in that city, and regulations enacted by the government make it nontrivial to start a bank that does do business with that person, then for all practical purposes, "the government has decided that a person is not allowed to have a bank account."

  26. Re: Cash is king by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Was chatting to a hotel manager the other day about Expedia. She told me they often wait up to 3 months after the customer has been and gone to get paid for the stay.

  27. We're already there in some parts of the world. by Rmorph · · Score: 2

    I live in Norway. I haven't touched cash in about 4 years - and that was on a trip to America. Hand on my heart I havent been in a single situation where cash was required. We still keep 500 kroner (60 dollars?) in a drawer for home emergencies - but we've never had to use it. MY 2 year old daughter will never see cash. Even in her birthday cards - she has a bank account and when the time comes for her to spend money she'll have a mobile phone.

    1. Re:We're already there in some parts of the world. by wonkavader · · Score: 2

      This is because you are not going to poor areas to eat. Half my favorite restaurants are cash only. The clientele is almost entirely non-white. Credit cards cost the business ~2% (lower % with higher monthly and other fees, or higher percent with no startup/monthly fees -- When you see these little businesses with the square card readers on a tablet -- those guys are paying 2.75% of everything they make to a company named "Square"). You don't notice this 2% tax on everything you do. People who are just barely getting by DO, and they favor cash-only businesses which are cheaper.

      This is not a state-run cash-less financial system we're talking about here -- It's a for-profit model where the populace voluntarily pays for the convenience. When you talk about a cash-less society in the US, you're talking about a new 2% regressive tax on poor people, where the money doesn't even go into state/communal coffers.

      This is similar to the healthcare situation. We have no full-coverage state healthcare because companies make money on healthcare, and they buy politicians to make sure that doesn't change.

      If we brought in meaningful campaign finance reform, some politician would say "hey -- we could make a state-run credit card and collect that regressive tax ourselves. We could make it lower than 2% and collect that for the state. Retailers would dump the commercial systems in a heartbeat to get the better rate. We could use the force of the treasury department (who use guns/judges/prisons) to cut down fraud in a way the private companies never could and therefore make the system even more profitable and use that money on schools, roads, etc." OVERNIGHT, these articles would change from CASH-IS-BAD to STATE-MONEY-SYSTEMS-ARE-BAD because these articles are paid for by the credit-card companies.

      But don't worry, that will never happen, because we will never have meaningful campaign finance reform. Politicians need the big donors to get elected, and so will do what they are told.

    2. Re:We're already there in some parts of the world. by SemperOSS · · Score: 1

      It is nice to hear from someone who is well to do and who has obviously never done a dodgy transaction in his lifetime. That is not the norm, I tell you.

      When you have had repairs done on your house, you have never asked to settle in cash without receipt but always paid the full amount including VAT (merverdiavgift, mva), which is good for your country. You have never had an affair and never had to pay for objects (dildos, butt plugs, ..., you name it) you would rather not like your partner (or anyone else) to know about. You don't frequent bars, night clubs and similar establishments of questionable reputation and live a fruitful and righteous life.

      Good.

      Unfortunately, your situation does not extend to everyone else. You could, in principle, say that it is not your concern that other people have dirty secrets they do not want other people to know about; and you would (and should) obviously not condone that people are trying to avoid paying their taxes, but ... There are many people around the world, including Norway, that are in so dire a situation that they cannot afford having a payment card or who cannot control their spending when they cannot see the actual amount of money in their hand. What about those people. Please do not start arguments like "it is their own fault", "they should pull themselves together and just not spend more money than they have", ..., some of these people have severe mental health problems and cannot change their behaviour.

      I know the welfare system in Norway is very good and that the state takes hand of most health and poverty problems, but it still has a number of charities, who benefit from people being able to donate in cash. How do you think the charity runs would fare if the canvassers accosting people in the streets to ask for money, if people had to actually get their cards out instead of cool cash? Not so well, I think. Many people would rather not give any money than show the charity collectors that they meant to give only the equivalent of a few coins. I can just imagine that: Thank you sir for the gift of 50 øre. Would you like a receipt?

      A cashless society may make the world more convenient for a lot of people, but it is at a cost to each and every person as the payments go through payments processors and banks, who, with the government that now can check every single transaction, are the biggest beneficiaries of such system. In effect, cashless payments are "taxed" by the amount these companies charges, and the only people to pay are ... us!

      --
      I don't need a signature to draw attention to myself.
    3. Re:We're already there in some parts of the world. by tepples · · Score: 1

      I live in Norway. I haven't touched cash in about 4 years

      When you shop at a yard sale (an occasional personal sale of used goods outside one's home), what form of electronic payment does the cashier accept for payments of 5 to 30 krone? (For those at home, that's about 0.50 to 3 USD.) Or does Norway not have yard sales?

      MY 2 year old daughter will never see cash. [...] when the time comes for her to spend money she'll have a mobile phone.

      Between "when the time comes for her to spend money" and when she graduates, from what income will she pay for service on this phone? Do flip phones in Norway support electronic payment? Or does "the time" not "come[] for her to spend money" until she graduates?

    4. Re:We're already there in some parts of the world. by Rmorph · · Score: 1

      People don't have yard sales here - the most common way of selling stuff is online via a Norwegian ebay-style site called Finn.no. Culturally Norwegians are much more reserved and don't invite strangers onto their lawns. If a church or school or something organises a sale they will have a handheld card terminal or something. There are a number of electronic payment method. Most people under 40 already use a mobile to mobile app payment method called vipps which is where you just enter a friends email and the amount you want to send and they get their amount to their account immediately. You can pay for coffee or groceries this way as well and there will only be more of that type of thing with other providers coming to the Norwegian market such as paypal, apple and facebook.

  28. Barter by havana9 · · Score: 1

    Because in the future due the fall of western society the economy will return to barter.

  29. What about the disenfranchised? by maddog42 · · Score: 2

    I frequently give some spare change to the homeless or the sub-saharans that are selling tissues at the traffic circles. They likely don't even have a presence in the digital world and probably can't get one...

    1. Re:What about the disenfranchised? by ThosLives · · Score: 2

      Yes - to go fully cashless, society would have to first put in place the infrastructure necessary to guarantee everyone can have a bankable account and the tools to access it, regardless of address or education level or whatever, and deal with age (are we going to issue infants accounts at birth so Grandma can deposit gifts?).

      I am cynical that this is possible - we have enough trouble providing universal <service> as it is, let alone guaranteeing universal banking.

      --
      "There are a dozen opinions on a matter until you know the truth. Then there is only one." - CS Lewis (paraprhase)
  30. Re: The end to bankruns by Bruce66423 · · Score: 1

    Yes and now. Whilst it would end the bankruns of popular memory, the 2008 crisis saw more subtle versions where banks were refused access to the interbank market with equally disastrous consequences.

  31. old "news" by Tom · · Score: 1

    The end of cash has been announced for decades, basically every time some cashless payment system becomes popular. Credit cards, PayPal, Apple Pay, you name it.

    Won't happen. Cash is still the easiest, most convenient payment for both small everyday transactions and private-to-private exchanges. It already has disappeared from most large purchases - people buying a house or a car on cash have become so rare that they're newsworthy. But in all other areas, change is much more slow than all the news articles claim.

    Change will continue to happen, but cash won't disappear anytime soon.

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    1. Re:old "news" by nealric · · Score: 1

      Cash may still be holding on (and probably will in some form or another for many many years), but it is in steady decline. The circumstances where cash MUST be used have fallen to near zero.

      I disagree it is even great for private-private exchanges. For small transfers (like a group paying at a restaurant), I rarely have exact change, meaning you end up owing or someone owes you. For large transfers, it means physically going to the bank and the security risk of carrying a large amount of cash. I'd much rather have someone use an electronic payment service in such circumstances.

      Personally, I use cash maybe about once a month. If big brother wants you, cash won't save you, especially it becomes a rare thing to pay in cash.

  32. Re:Sweden.. by Orphis · · Score: 1

    Cash is still useful in Sweden!

    Have you ever lost or had your wallet stolen? You need to save a little bit of cash for expenses just in case.
    Happened to me a couple years ago, I had my card skimmed just before Midsommar. The new one obviously didn't arrive in 2 working days and I needed to buy all the celebration necessities.

  33. Cash transactions == tax by another name by orlanz · · Score: 2

    I don't understand why people think I want to stop by a bank/ATM every once in a while. With cashless, I go there twice a year and feel both trips are a waste of time.

    15 years ago, I had to stop by the Elec office to pay my monthly bill. I though it was asasine then that I had to not only pay for my time but also the teller to... what basically amounted to paper shuffling and database entries.

    Cashless saves me a TON of time and money; and not just at the check out counter. I got better things to do with my time... like doze off in my backyard.

    And we pay middlemen for everything and everywhere. That cashier, elec company teller, toll booth collector, parking attendant, water meter readers, lawn services sales guy, L1 customer support, etc. These are all labor units that are no different than any middleman.

    PS: And I fully support Philadelphia's accept cash initiative. Because some members of our society can't go cashless for whatever reasons. And I believe it is the responsibility of any incorporated authority to provide for all of its resident's needs. This is on top of the legalities that cash is the tender for debt in the US. Don't like those points; go set up shop in an unincorporated area.

    1. Re:Cash transactions == tax by another name by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      My bank is walking distance from home and work -- it's no big deal to stop at an ATM ... as far as supporting the cash initiative, it's not only good for the unbanked, but for privacy in general.

    2. Re: Cash transactions == tax by another name by orlanz · · Score: 1

      We have an ATM downstairs in my office. I can use my debit card to withdraw cash at most stores. But I literally get cash about 3x a year and rarely carry more than $30 on me. To me, the time wasted (however small that may seem to some) is just not worth it. And I have been like this for almost two decades.

      I so rarely make checks out and use ATMs that I have to triple check my work or menu just to make sure I did it all right. I actually know my way around my stock portfolio better than an ATM.

    3. Re: Cash transactions == tax by another name by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      My privacy is worth the extra one minute once or twice a week. Plus, paying cash is often CHEAPER -- we went to a restaurant that offered a 10% cash discount just last week. (And no, I really don't care about the legal/tax implications of this -- not my fucking problem.)

  34. Lunch.. by jythie · · Score: 1

    And here I am planning to hit the bank so I have cash on hand for getting lunches. This really strikes me as someone living in their own affluent cultural bubble and confusing 'millennials' with 'their immediate peer group'.

  35. Cash = Privacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I like cash. I like privacy. Don't force all to use CCs.

    If some millenials -and others- are happy to share their buy patterns with the Visas and Mastercards of the world, it's your business. Just don't force us into your stupid quest to rid the world of cash.

    1. Re:Cash = Privacy by ledow · · Score: 1

      You will be forced.

      But not because those people are forcing you.

      Because you will soon find that there is no alternative for you, not because people have been vying to get rid of it, but because it's simply not practical to operate anymore.

      For an example, see cheques.

    2. Re:Cash = Privacy by Woldarp · · Score: 1

      You're going to have to start buying tools and bulk comodoties to avoid tracking. Every home will have a milling machine, and a lathe for making metal parts.

  36. sure, why not by sad_ · · Score: 1

    sure, i like how easy it is to pay with my card, it's my prefered way of paying for stuff.
    i don't want to pay with my phone, anything involving money has no place on my phone.

    --
    On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.
  37. US LAW REQUIRES CASH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It is an old law; it says dollars MUST be accepted for all debts. The only work around is to NOT allow the debt in the 1st place in advance; kind of a word game but the courts if they have any common sense will rule that cash can not be forbidden.

    You can keep the requirement for cash... but you'll get profiled as being a shady person with something to hide. You'll have troubles as the teenager struggles to do basic math and operate a cash register.

    We DO need to KILL nickles and pennies. probably just move everything into 1/10 . don't think biz doesn't round $ like crazy already. POINT: lincoln killed the 1/2 penny which today is worth over 10 cents! But then we don't need to ban... we can make stuff a pain in the ass and people will act like they are in pain to have to handle literally worthless coins...

  38. They're already cashless by GrumpySteen · · Score: 1

    Being broke and unemployed sucks, but it is a cashless lifestyle.

  39. Search and replace by wonkavader · · Score: 1

    I am positive that all these stories are bought and paid for by publicists working for credit card companies and similar big financial firms.

    Imagine the woody any such company gets when it contemplates getting a few percent cut of EVERY transaction BY LAW. Right now every real dollar bill spent anywhere in the company ROBS the credit card companies of their ~2% transaction cut. They want that money. It's a lot.

    Americans and foreigners visiting the US should all be required to pay a 2% sales tax to some rich companies whenever they buy anything. That's just right and proper. This is what this is about, pure and simple. All discussion of security or convenience or even the absurd claims of cost reduction are smoke to obscure the real reason for this.

    1. Re:Search and replace by PPH · · Score: 1

      Simple solution: Nationalize card transaction processing under the authority of the Federal Reserve bank. Like they handle check clearing today.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
  40. Cash isn't going away by sjbe · · Score: 1

    "I haven't had a nickel, dime, quarter or penny in my pocket for two years," writes USA Today tech columnist Jefferson Graham, adding "Why bother? We're now living in what's quickly becoming a cashless society, where credit cards or electronic payments on your phone rule."

    That's because he is rich or at least relatively so and clueless about how lots of people actually live. Poor people don't get this option. Credit cards don't work well in remote areas without network connections. Good luck doing a Venmo in the middle of Alaska. Something like 15% of Americans don't have bank accounts or credit cards or debit cards and many cannot get them under reasonable terms even if they wanted to. Cash isn't going away any time soon and this guy is an idiot if he really believes it will.

  41. That’s okay, though by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

    Because after the rent on their TriBeCa studio and their student loans, millennials don’t have any money.

    1. Re:That’s okay, though by nealric · · Score: 1

      You'd need a pretty decent income stream to afford a TriBeCa studio in the first place- landlords in NYC won't even approve you if you don't make 40x rent, which would be $2,500 minimum (more like $3,500 for most) in that neighborhood. So you are talking about "cash strapped" folks making $100k+.

  42. Credit card rebates by jerry_gitomer · · Score: 1

    The middleman causing higher prices for cashless transactions does not apply. An everyday example:

    We are both in the gas station and we both buy $10 at the pump. You pay cash I use my credit card,
    but it only costs me $9.70 because I get a 3% rebate.

    The merchant is paying 5% to the credit card company for processing the sale, but is getting benefits that compensate; for example faster transaction processing, no bounced check fees, no cash embezzlement, no worries about hold ups, an increased customer count because he accepts credit cards, higher sales per customer transaction, and more satisfied customers.

    Not all benefits apply to all merchants, but enough do to make the 5% fee palatble.

    Meanwhile I will be saving 3% on my purchases.

    1. Re:Credit card rebates by PPH · · Score: 1

      Meanwhile I will be saving 3% on my purchases.

      With a $0.20 per gallon markup on a $3.00 /gallon price for credit/debit purchases? Sure, you can skip the discount gas stations and get one price for everyone. That will add about $0.50 per gallon.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
  43. okay by hamburger+lady · · Score: 1

    "I haven't had a nickel, dime, quarter or penny in my pocket for two years," writes USA Today tech columnist Jefferson Graham

    didn't know that coins were the beginning and end of cash money.

    --

    ---
    Is this the MPAA? Is this the RIAA? Is this the DMCA? I thought it was the USA!
  44. Re: Cash is king by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

    Find what the hotel costs on Expedia. Offer 10% less in cash, with a card for security/incidentals. Profit. Works nicely for smaller motels at least.

  45. Yeah. It's called Bitcoin. by xtal · · Score: 1

    Haters going to hate, but crypto works.

    --
    ..don't panic
  46. Thank God for illegal immigration... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

    I mean it. Illegal immigration keeps the cash economy a-hummin' along nicely in the US -- I thank illegal immigrants for helping preserve my freedom of choice (to pay cash) and privacy. And no, I'm not a coward, so I'm not bothered by the supposed negative implications of the above.

  47. Business before people by tflf · · Score: 1

    Just ignore the minor issues of the poor, who have little or no access to non-cash options, or any crank concerned about personal privacy or the inconvenient fact cash is still legal tender. Our only priority should be making businesses happy. Cash needs to remain an option because transactions cannot be tracked by government, business, or third parties. Data from cash transactions cannot be used or sold to track you and your life. Cash works when the power is out, or the Internet connection is down - depending on where you live, or travel, can be an issue. Some small businesses and service providers are cash only. As long as cash is legal tender, acceptance of cash is simply part of the cost for anyone operating a physical business, like rent, power, employee wages, inventory, etc. FYI: I use debit, PayPal, credit cards, etc. when I shop online, and usually in the real world. But, certain transactions are in cash. Tips are always left in cash - some merchants skim tip money from electronic transactions. Some purchases are better done without an electronic record - gifts for my wife for example. And, believe it or not, a few merchants still offer a cash discount.

  48. Socio-economic divide by MobyDisk · · Score: 1

    The cashless world has an income barrier.

    There are lots of people who don't have credit cards or bank accounts at all. They take their pay check to the nearest check cashing service as soon as they receive it. Some of them now allow you to do bill pay right there from your pay check. If they need to buy something online, they go to a retail store and buy an Amazon or iTunes or Visa gift card with cash, then use that to make purchases.

  49. Cashless == paperless. by AnotherBlackHat · · Score: 2

    At best we'll reach a "cashless" society in the same way we've reached a "paperless" office.

    Cash will diminish, sure. But end?
    What about kids? Are they going to start getting debit cards? Or will they just not be allowed to buy anything in this brave new world?
    Lot's of people don't have bank accounts. What about them?

    You don't replace one technology with another unless it's better in every way.
    If the new is only better in most ways, then it's only going to mostly replace the old.

    1. Re:Cashless == paperless. by Kjella · · Score: 1

      Cash will diminish, sure. But end? What about kids? Are they going to start getting debit cards? Or will they just not be allowed to buy anything in this brave new world?

      Yes. That's already the solution here in Norway, they have "allowance" cards down to 8 year olds. It's linked to their parents who can see the balance and transactions, they can't get it withdrawn as cash, they need approval to send to other people and there's strict withdrawal limits and obviously no credit limit/overdraw possibility.

      Lot's of people don't have bank accounts. What about them?

      Pretty much the same as above, except for illegal immigrants no matter how much of a drug addict or whatever there's no reason why you shouldn't have a bank account. I know here in Norway we now have digital food stamps, before it was a requisition - because if you gave them cash it went straight to drugs and alcohol - now they "pay" with a card like other people, as long as you don't try to buy beer. Illegal labor is one of the reasons they want to get rid of cash so many would say this is a feature not a bug.

      They are considering anonymous "charge cards" for tourists etc. with various limitations. One variation I heard is an expiry date before you have to cash it in and no anonymous -> anonymous transfers. That would make it quite painful to keep any major amount of money out of the system and knowing where it came from and where it's going is a pretty good trace.

      Honestly, the main reason cash is still on the table is as an emergency backup. No power, no phones, no Internet, system down = no money to keep society going. You can run for a little while on IDs and IOUs, but not very long...

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  50. Until there's something impossible, like, you know, a thunderstorm.

  51. Dildos.com Frequent Buyer Program by Zorro · · Score: 1

    Hi this is your Friendly local Government.

    We see You Bought A LOT Of Dildos.

    Your Place Of Employment has been notified. Pervert.

  52. Banks and credit card companies want by PPH · · Score: 1

    ...you to pay as many of those tasty transaction fees as possible

    FTFY.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  53. Minimum fees by cordovaCon83 · · Score: 1

    The vending machine at works charge me an extra dime on the dollar if I use a credit card, even if I run it debit. The bar down the street insists on a $10 minimum on credit card due to banking fees. The gas station around the corner charges a higher rate for credit purchases of gasoline. These banking fees results in million if not billions in profits for banks every day. I'm over here trying to get my budget right -- I can't have the bank nicking and diming me at every corner.

  54. Hipster by goombah99 · · Score: 1

    As the first post proves, when cash goes out of being used, hipsters will use cash.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
  55. Who said anything about drug abuse? by Petersko · · Score: 1

    I mentioned alcohol abuse... but only drug use. Not abuse. Conflating one to the other is a mistake.

    I'm saying a happy, balanced life is not necessarily the normal state of man. Mostly balanced, okay.

    "I personally have no respect for people who don't have the courage to lose complete control of their lives for a few years." - Marc Maron

  56. Affairs happen. by Petersko · · Score: 1

    Affairs happen all the time. And the majority go undiscovered and fade into the past without terminating the relationship.

    Given that nothing seems to stem the tide of infidelity, it seems to me that the cashless society would cause a rise in the divorces.

  57. Re: Cash is king by reanjr · · Score: 1

    In most cases, businesses are forced into the status quo. You can't run a hotel business and hope to not accept guests through such middlemen. That's how the consumers shop.

  58. The black market by Kernel+Kurtz · · Score: 1

    is a very important check on unfettered government power, and it thrives on cash.

    Nothing good can come of this, and people pushing it (for their own self-interested motives) should be shunned.

  59. Cashless sounds convenient until... by VeryFluffyBunny · · Score: 1

    ...there's a power outage, or internet goes down, or banks start fleecing business owners with inflated fees, etc..

    Also, as long as people still have the option to use cash relatively conveniently, we won't be so susceptible to hyper-exploitative practices by banks & credit card companies that'd make the big telecoms monopolies blush. You know they're just waiting for the opportunity, don't you?

    --
    Debate is a form of harassment. Do not question my truth.
  60. Thanks to the columnist minion for self-IDing. by sgt_doom · · Score: 1

    This columnist/blog writer is such an obvious twit, either beyond stupid or in league with the money masters --- what a load of tripe!

  61. Card to build social credit. Cash for all others. by bd580slashdot · · Score: 1

    This is a bit off-topic. But until it's all cashless ... I use my card for purchases that will improve my social credit rating, and cash for everything else. For example, I pay cash for alcohol and use a card when I but fresh healthy food. Sure, it takes a little longer to split the transaction if I'm buying both at the same time, but I think it's worth it. If you can afford to, then keep $200 in cash on you at all times. That's enough to get a cheap room and to buy transportation in an emergency, or if your credit card processing system goes down. I also keep a couple rolls of quarters and a bunch of $1 bills in my emergency bag in my car because they are the most common vending machine denominations. You never know ...

  62. I get a 1.5% discount by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    in the form of various rewards programs and cashback. I also get the option to dispute most transactions (thanks to US Law, YMMV in your country though). I'm also not liable for unauthorized charges.

    As for the businesses taking my credit cards, they get to sell me more crap (my kid has a copy of my card with her name on it for use in college and yeah, she's spent more on it then I'd probably budget her if I gave her cash, she's got a 4.0 despite getting sick as a dog last year, I can't complain). And it effectively lets a company issue credit without the need to do collections.

    I think it mostly works for folks in good financial shape. Where it becomes nasty is if you're not in good financial shape. Then the sharks circle with 30%+ APRs and they sell your debt to each other and use our legal system to garnish wages. But all that's fixable with some more regulation and some pro-working class legislation like what Bernie Sander's is proposing.

    Speaking of Bernie, I think Credit Cards are a good example of something that works well in the context of Democratic Socialism and Mixed Market Capitalism. e.g. something that we can leave the bulk of it up to private industry while regulating it enough to prevent abuses.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:I get a 1.5% discount by martinX · · Score: 1

      Fancy 404 error.
      Oops! We can’t find that page
      If you’ve followed a link from another site for an extension or theme, that item is no longer available. This could be because:

      The developer removed it. Developers commonly do this because they no longer support the extension or theme, or have replaced it.
      Mozilla removed it. This can happen when issues are found during the review of the extension or theme, or the extension or theme has been abusing the terms and conditions for addons.mozilla.org. The developer has the opportunity to resolve the issues and make the add-on available again.
      If you’ve followed a link on this site, you’ve have found a mistake. Help us fix the link by filing an issue. Tell us where you came from and what you were looking for, and we'll get it sorted.

      Try visiting the page later, as the theme or extension may become available again. Alternatively, you may be able to find what you’re looking for in one of the available extensions or themes.

      --
      When they came for the communists, I said "He's next door. Take him away. Goddam commies."
  63. Millennials have no cash by lamer01 · · Score: 1

    So when everyone else has perished, the Millennial world will be a cashless world

  64. I worked in Fast Food by rsilvergun · · Score: 2

    and would have loved cashless. Every store I worked at had been robbed at least once while I worked there. I avoided it by sheer dumb luck. The owner of one chain used to keep their lobby's open 24/7 until somebody got pistol whipped. They didn't close them until the cops got fed up and said they'd press negligence charges on the owner the next time somebody got hurt.

    What I'm saying is cash isn't free to a business. There are costs involved. The businesses dropping cash aren't doing it to be hip or because they drunk kool-aid. They're doing it because the costs are now higher than the alternatives.

    And if it bother's you that much just do Postal Banking with government issued cards. Have the gov't issue gift card like devices if being traced bugs you. But I've said this before, being tracked should be low on your list of worries in a world like ours. If you're American you've got Health Care, jobs, climate change and the 8 wars we're fighting. Tracking is a symptom of oppression, not the cause. Focus on the systemic issues that oppress you.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  65. Taxes by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    India did a major shake up to it's paper currency because they couldn't get folks to pay their taxes. It was bad enough that it was retarding the country's growth and modernization efforts.

    You can still have spending privacy for small transactions (think under $10k) with various cash cards. What'll go away is hiding large amounts of money from the tax man in cash. As somebody who gets paid his salary electronically and pays every dime of taxes I say "Good".

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  66. We could just legalize those things by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    the current system is kind of fucked up. If you're wealthy you've got basically zero chance of getting arrested for a little hash & shrooms. Being white helps too.

    Every wonder why we haven't legalized drugs? It's because drugs being illegal isn't a problem for a significant portion of the population. Hell, Nixon's people admitted that it was a political move, literally state sponsored terrorism against minorities they didn't like ("minorities" here being literal, e.g. not just race/creed/color but also political minorities).

    There's a big push for drug reform thanks to the "opioid crisis". We even passed some real criminal justice reform. What changed? Middle Class, rural white men and women were getting caught up in the drug war for a change. Since they're a valuable voting block to the right wing (and the left wing already wanted to stop treating drug users like criminals) some progress happened.

    I wouldn't mind seeing all of it brought out into the light. Legal taxed and regulated for the weak stuff (pot & shrooms) and treat the hard stuff (Meth, Heroine) like a disease. That's not going to happen so long as 70% of the population can use witn impunity...

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  67. Cash isn't free either by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    it has to be counted, moved by secured trucks to banks. You have "shrinkage" in retail & restaurant (e.g. stealing from the till or not ringing up orders, every wonder why you see your order on a screen at a fast food restaurant? it's not so they get it right...).

    When I worked at a fast food joint we were allowed to be off by a certain amount on each till. It was just expected. It was a couple bucks on a $100 till IIRC, so around 2% right there. We weren't always, but I'm guessing that alone was a 1% loss.

    And that's before we talk about armed robbery. I pointed this out elsewhere on the thread but cashless would be a boom to fast food and convenience store employees who often get robbed. And companies typically have to carry insurance to cover that risk. Plus there's the lost money from the robbery.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  68. There's an easy solution to all that by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    just stop means testing welfare programs. Implement UBI. Problem solved.

    Or if you have to means test stop doing it on moral grounds. You know most of the South is doing drug test laws for welfare recipients, right? No cash involved.

    One last thing, nobody knows what book you bought except Amazon. All the Credit Card companies know is that you bought something from Amazon.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:There's an easy solution to all that by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Any new UBI will not be given as cash.
      A UBI as a gov assistance program will set all kinds of political, nutritional, welfare limits on spending as its gov money been given to citizens.
      Cash gives freedom.
      A bank, CC, book seller can see what a person was reading, their politics and then take away service.
      Then put that person on a shared watch list to inform other banks and CC brands about why the person had their account removed.
      Where to pay a wage into when a bank removes the ability to have an account and tells other banks/CC not to trust that person?

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  69. You know we have gift cards, right? by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    completely untraceable unless you're buying dozens of them at a time. Even then they're still untraceable, but they'll stake out the area if you keep doing it in the same place. But long before they did that they'd just stake out your regular haunts and catch you there.

    Credit Cards are not the Number of the Beast. They're not a perfectly traceable item. Nor do they need to be. Cops have much, much better ways to get their way.

    You're right about one thing, cashless would make cops jobs easier. It would end stick ups. There'd be no point knocking over a convenience store or fast food joint if there was no cash there.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:You know we have gift cards, right? by tepples · · Score: 1

      There'd be no point knocking over a convenience store or fast food joint if there was no cash there.

      Instead, they'd knock over places that sell gift cards for cash.

  70. Re:Card to build social credit. Cash for all other by Woldarp · · Score: 1

    This is a good idea. I have a google account where I'm subscribed to Tana Mongeau Buzzfeed and Logan Paul. Once in a while I'll binge on Donald Duck when I'm leaving to go out. I do my real watching over TOR only, and won't like anything unless it allows liking over TOR. ( eg: bitchute.com ). It's time to start building social credit and taking that shit seriously.

  71. Transaction fees for sub-dollar transactions by tepples · · Score: 1

    Dear United States. New Zealand has had EFTPOS for years and years.

    We have EFTPOS in the United States as well. It's just very rare to see a merchant that accepts EFTPOS but not credit cards.

    There is a small fee to the merchant for each transaction

    Which itself is prohibitive for the 0.50 to 3.00 USD transactions at yard sales. Is there also a monthly fee for a merchant to accept EFTPOS?

  72. US has EFTPOS by tepples · · Score: 1

    U.S. banks and credit unions are part of EFTPOS networks called Interlink and Maestro. "Visa Debit" cards are on Interlink, and "Debit MasterCard" cards are on Maestro.

  73. Carrying a phone != subscribing to cellular data by tepples · · Score: 1

    The pocket computer than approximately everyone carries

    Just because someone carries a pocket computer doesn't mean he also subscribes to Internet access for use on that pocket computer while away from home. Currently I subscribe to cable data and do not subscribe to cellular data because switching from cable data to cellular data would cause my home use to routinely exceed the 10 GB per month mobile hotspot data cap that all major cellular ISPs impose.

  74. Thanks for cashless society by McFortner · · Score: 1

    Big Brother would like to thank everybody for pushing for a cashless soceity. It makes it SO MUCH EASIER to keep track of you and is more reliable than tracking your cellphones.

    Remember: Big Brother is watching YOU!

    --
    Beware of Sales Reps bearing gifts.
  75. Re: Cash is king by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

    Even if they paid the same day, the aggregator (Expedia, etc) gets their cut off the top. It's more profit to the hotel if you book direct, and the price to you can be lower. You're paying a lot for the convenience of Expedia or Booking.com.