Domain: crimelibrary.com
Stories and comments across the archive that link to crimelibrary.com.
Comments · 122
-
Re:so sadI am under no illusions about how painful, difficult, and disappointing raising my daughter maybe if she turns out to have Downs...
Maybe it won't be quite as bad as you think. The families I've seen rasing Downs Syndrome kids seemed to be doing ok. The goals and milestones are very different, but they still grow and progress, however slowly, and they have their triumphs. Some friends of ours had a baby with DS. About six months later, they adopted a second DS child. They said that those were the most pleasant, loving babies they'd ever had (and they'd had a passel of 'em). The DS adults I've known were a pretty good bunch, too. They didn't have a mean bone in them, and they seemed to be pretty happy most of the time.
You will have some worries that most parents don't have. Better start thinking sooner rather than later about how the kid is going to get by after you're gone. Time enough for that when she's 10 or so.
I'll be praying that she's born normal, just as you are, but don't panic if not: it's not the end of the world for you.
Our doctors wanted to advise us about our "options".
... I just can't imagine anyone wanting to do such a thing - especially since we've seen her in full motion 3D video on two seperate occasions ...I think that high resolution ultrasound has to be the abortion industry's greatest nightmare. After you see that baby in there, it's not a choice you're killing, or a foetus, but your baby. And that's different.
And for the worst shame of all, doctors who repeatedly promote termination of even marginally defective babies and are constantly harping about options -alternatives! - to life.
Anyone who is in favor of killing innocent people isn't fit to practice medicine. ``Euthanasia'' is how the Germans got started on their ``final solution''. The German medical establishment began killing defective people, like the old and the retarded and the terminally ill. Then they moved on to the crippled (Germany had lots of those, after WWI). This was promoted by the country's leading doctors. By the time the Nazis were ready to do something final about the Jews, the medical establishment was ready to accept large scale slaughter of innocents, and doctors like Mengele were accepted in the German medical profession.
Any doctor who will do an elective abortion is unfit to practice medicine, just surely as Dr. Mengele and Charles Manson are.
-
Re:Aww geez
-
Re:Prison?
Robert Durst was acquitted of murder charges by paying 1.8 million in legal fees. The RIAA exploits a 1976 copyright law to claim each song shared is valued at up to $150,000. It costs the same amount of money to commit murder and hire expensive attornies as it does to get caught pirating an album and be sued by the RIAA.
-
Re:Step 1: Get eaten by dingoes.
Movie? Wasn't ir a real case where a woman claimed that a dingo had eaten her baby? Later on she was accused and jailed for murder of said baby.
More info here and here. -
Re:Book recommendation: The Great Train RobberyWhat makes this more confusing is that the name "The Great Train Robbery" often indicates the 1963 robbery of the Glasgow-to-London mail train by Biggs:
http://www.crimelibrary.com/gangsters_outlaws/cop
s _others/biggs/index.html?sect=18/However, the supposed Train Robbery in Crichton's book happened much earlier. Everything I've seen so far seem to indicate that it never actually took place.
-- Marcio
-
De Hory and art forgery
Elmyr de Hory was one of the greatest forgers of all time, and a really interesting guy.
Clifford Irving, who was also a forger in his own field, wrote a really good book on de Hory, titled Fake! (with the exclamation).
And then of course Orson Welles made a film exploring these issues.
All highly recommended. The art forgery world is at least as interesting as the "legitimate" art world.
If you want to get into it, there's a primer available.
-
Re:Sequel ideas?
And I guess a William Kennedy-Smith simulation dating game?
-
Re:Wait a second
If you want a black market handgun in Australia, you are looking at a price tag of several thousands of dollars. The same gun in the US would be, $50 perhaps. That price tag is the key - what down and out crim can afford that?
... Don't wait for a massacre like out Port Arthur tragedy.
$50 my ass. If you ever buy a gun for $50, you'd better have a good emergency room nearby, because that gun is going to explode in your hand.
Incidentally, in the aforementioned Port Arthur tragedy, the individual possessed an AR-15, and an FN FAL, guns that easily command a price tag over $1000 dollars each (even in the post-ban United States). So much for a thousands-of-dollars price tag deterring crime. -
Uh oh a decentergo go gadget flame suit!
I like my Windows boxes junkware-free, thanks (oxymoron noted).
There is one thing that gets me about slashdot. That thing is the windows bashing. Windows XP IMO was worth the money. No other operating system makes my laptop function so well. OMG could that be the purpose of an operating system... no can't be...
I digressed, back to the topic at hand
Yes I'm a victim of the FUD :rollseyes: but the reason MS Windows sees all this crap is because they have 85-95% of the desktop market share. Now what is going to bring you more profit, targeting 10% of the market or 90% of it?
So this development is not exactly surprising. also their is so much competition in this software market that it's probably in the developers best interest not to sell out. If the developers sell out to everyone then they have lost the point of their business model.
Summation:- Don't bash windows because it has a large market share.
- Don't bash microsoft for trying to make an OS everyone can use.. By everyone I mean 99.9% of the world that are not sycotic security admins
- This is as common as organized crime in the 20's and 30's. Take the money and look the other way.
- Finally there will always be an Eliot Ness
-
I don't like this
-
Re:Addiction or mental illness symptom?
Bravo! Finally somebody who separates the causes of addictive and compulsive behavior from the behavior itself.
A compulsive personality can settle on almost anything as a target. I went through a period of about 10 years where I had to load a washing machine in a certain fashion, or I would get the jitters and have to pull the clothes back out. Weird and funny (even to me at the time), and completely unpredictable. A harmless enough compulsion, so I didn't try to fight it.
On the other hand, some of my compulsive eating habits are far from harmless. Too often my stress reaction has been to make a pan of mac-&-cheese then eat the whole thing. Now I only keep 2-3 boxes of mac-&-cheese in the pantry, because at that inventory level the fear of running completely out tends to balance the craving to eat it.
An RPG is a large easy target for compulsion radar-lock. A world with clear, well-defined (if sometimes hidden) rules, where your boss can't follow you, the IRS can't audit you, and your cat's litter-box doesn't smell. In itself the game is harmless (if not particularly beneficial to health or finances), but an inability to stop playing is a sign of a larger problem, just like binge eating (or self-starvation).
Just shutting off the game and going outdoors won't solve the underlying problem. A person who is attracted to that sort of retreat from the real world will likely continue to have problems with reality until he finds another target for his compulsions, or, in the worst case, finds his own version of the Texas Tower. The underlying problems must be addressed. -
Ex-cons are the best security experts!
Silicon.com asks its CIO Jury: Would you hire a hacker? and finds the jury split down the middle, with one IT Director saying doing so would be like hiring serial-killing doctor Harold Shipman to treat your ailing and aged mother."
Flawed analogy. It takes a thief to catch a thief - ex-cons often serve as security advisers. The most famous case is obviously that of Frank Abagnale, master of bank fraud, whose autobiography was recently filmed, but he was not the only one. There's actually nothing new in the idea of hiring hacker/cracker to improve your security - it's like hiring an experience burglar to help you design better locks. -
Re:Hello NWO
Just like France refuses to extradite the Unicorn Killer
Newsflash: He's already in Philadelphia awaiting trial -
Re:negative racial overtonesDo me a favor - send me a link where you made a comment along the same lines when GTA Vice City came out.
What? No link? How about GTA 3? 2? 1? No? hmmm... So what you're saying is that you're a COMPLETE FUCKING HYPOCRITE. Right?
You have no problem when a video game shows a white man shooting people (so long as he's not shooting at black people right?) or even a fucking squirrel killing people, and you're cool with showing Some black sterotypes may be true, but as soon as there's a game that actually comes pretty damn close to the truth people start bitching... "Oh, it's racist..." "You're showing a black man killing - that's a stereotype.." No, it's the truth. Black people can kill. So can whites, and asians and puerto ricans and russians and anyone else. Please, just STFU!!!
-
Give the Poor Guy a Rest (not Arrest)
While Bobby Fischer might have technically violated some U.S. laws, (and this one technicality is just the first that he has dealt with) he really should simply be left alone.
I've been following Bobby Fischer since he started publishing Chess columns in Boys' Life. While not necessarily a hacker, certainly a classic geek.
He all but dropped out of society in almost a Ted Kaczynski fashion, and can IMHO be classified as the most persecuted American by the U.S. Government. He was also wanted a few years ago on tax evasion charges, but I thought that got cleared up. He really has been hounded by the U.S. government for many things, and gone through ups and downs in his life that I would not wish on anybody.
A really good writeup about Bobby Fischer's trip to Yugoslavia is on bobbyfischer.net
I had to use the internet wayback machine because for some reason the regular website is down. Probably due to some slashdotting, although in this case probably not directly due to slashdot it self (surprisingly). Some absolutely incredible articles. I've also seen segments on television news programs that have also discussed his life, and it seems rather pathetic. How much of this is brought onto himself, and how much is out right presecution remains to be debated, but he should really be given a nice quite spot in Montana and be left alone.
Maybe the U.S. government is afraid of letting intelligent people who think the U.S. government is screwed up be left alone. -
Re:Overkill? Random Chance of Death Penalty
This is also a problem we're facing in the "War on Terror". Those who subscribe to the terrorist-corrupted version of Islam believe that if they die while attacking non-believers they'll be taken to the happiest possible afterlife. Therefore, they design attacks in which they are sure to die, and we have nobody left to prosecute.
The 19 worst offenders in the Sept. 11 attacks died, therefore our criminal justice system is totally ineffective against them.
Timothy McVeigh wasn't affraid of the death penalty either. What version of Islam did he believe in?
Deterants do not work on fanatics, Islamists or otherwise. -
Seems easier to sneak a spy into closed source.Of course it's even possible for a foreign agent to sneak into a secretive oranization like this one .
It wouldn't surprise me if some Closed-Source companies have foreign nationals working on their software as well.
In either case, whoever's using software for National Security better audit the source code themselves. I wouldn't want missle systems to use Linux or Windows or some other RTOS without a careful audit.
-
Re:I swear I'm not that...
Wow. I didn't know you could get internet access in a isolated cell?
-
Re:Umm...
Somehow you hoped that people in such a fucked up society that leaves little girls in a burning school as they were not dressed correctly, were different.
Yes, because surely something so heinously stupid would never happen in the United States of America.
It's not a gene, it's little green men on pieces of little green paper... and some guys in funny hats and robes all vying for your 'faith', which equates to THEIR power. The Saudi's are certainly not the first to do something dumb in the name of 'religious beliefs', though. -
Recommended by serial killers worldwide!
Using drain cleaner to dispose of potentially hazardous meat and bone is a method apparently pioneered by a Belgian dude named Andras Pandy, who used it to dispose of several hundred pounds' worth of potentially hazardous proteins.
Unfortunately, the proteins he needed to get rid of were formerly in the form of people. The hazard was getting caught, not getting sick, so YMMV.
(I know the radical peta'ns might equate cow slaughter with serial murder, but as a serial hamburger killer myself, I can't make that connection.) -
Re:Maybe I'm being cynical, but..." They could save a lot of time and money if they would just red-flag every black and Arabic person in line."
What a great idea. Let's see if we miss anyone by going with your new security system, shall we?
Jeffrey Dahmer
Perhaps a planeload of these fine, upstanding citizens is your cup of tea. Personally, I'd rather have better detection systems and better trained airport security personnel.
-
Re:Maybe I'm being cynical, but..." They could save a lot of time and money if they would just red-flag every black and Arabic person in line."
What a great idea. Let's see if we miss anyone by going with your new security system, shall we?
Jeffrey Dahmer
Perhaps a planeload of these fine, upstanding citizens is your cup of tea. Personally, I'd rather have better detection systems and better trained airport security personnel.
-
Re:Ok, that really sucksI agree with much of your _sentiment_. But you really need to learn to slow down. Differentiate between passion and logic. Look;
"As for not putting serial killers in jail because some redneck jury decided that it's a good thing he rid the world of some damn niggers, I guess you're lucky that you don't have many serial...no wait."
We will ignore the fact you resorted to implying all Americans are racists. We could even ignore that Norway is not without serial killers, and has even exported some (ie. Dennis Nilsen ). If you are merely going for a comparison of quantity here, be sure to keep in mind that Norway is a nation of 4.5 million, while the United States is a nation of 275.5 million. Any competent lawyer, anywhere in the world, would use all of this against you. Nothing you said after that would carry much weight with a jury. We will assume that, somehow, the jury or judge is still listening. Still listening so they will be able to hear this;
"I'd prefer the European system any day; we're not executing minors and mentally ill and if some big-ass corp sues you you're not going bankrupt to pay a decent lawyer because the looser pays. The next time before you're posting your oh so patriotic bs try to actually understand that there are different ways to do something and one's not necessarily worse than the ther."
You made a really good point ( in my opinion ) that it is preferable to not execute minors and the mentally ill. The "big ass corp" example I am not so clear on. You say you don't have to worry if a "big ass corp" sues you because the loser pays. Well, what if a "big ass corp" sues you and you lose? What if you sue a "big ass corp" and the judge rules against you?
In any case, you argue that the european way is better ( is all of europe under the same set of laws? ), and then you tell the parent poster he should not say any system is better than another. Again, I'm sure you just lost the jury and or the judge on that one. Then you attack the original poster. His opinion is now all mindless "patriotic bs," and even if it was not the actions of George Bush somehow make the original poster's opinions worthless. Is this an example of european moderation, oldworld wisdom, or united europe progressiveness? -
Re:who can stop this?
Firstly, please provide links w.r.t Gen. Clark's involvement at Waco. I have an open mind and comprehend facts fairly well. Thus far he's the candidate I would choose, but all facts are good to know.
Secondly...
Vernon Howell (he later changed his name to David Koresh because he believed he was the second Messiah) was a lunatic who believed that the world was coming to and end and that the scene set forth in "Revelations" had already begun. (Now several years later, 2/3 of the world has not been consumed by fire and/or earthquake, and so we must assume that he was wrong about this).
For people familiar with what happened at the Jonestown massacre, it appeared that for all intents and purposes, Howell (Koresh) was about to order the execution of all the women, children, and men in the compound, much as was orchestrated by the "Reverend" Jim Jones (born . The fact that the attempted break into the compound was a complete disaster and ended with the deaths of nearly everyone inside the compound does not change the fact that Howell was a fugitive who had just been involved in a firefight with government officials.
If alternative #1 is allowing Howell (Koresh) to murder everyone inside the compound in a repeat of the Jonestown massacre, and alternative #2 is a risky assault on the compound in an attempt to save the people inside, and someone I cared about was inside the building, I would choose alternative #2. -
Re:Pontus Fuchs
Is he somehow related to Klaus Fuchs ? I mean, Klaus was a traitor to the country while Pontus seems to be a traitor to the Linux community (yes, allowing network card manufacturers to not have to consider writing Linux drivers is not helping the Linux community).
-
Re:Red storm rising (Cray & AMD)
-
Might be why they chose jail...You can't trust those Charles Ng's.
I suppose in Australia they haven't heard of him, but in the U.S. it's a little like walking around named Hermann Goering. Not everybody knows Goering's name, but you'll run into heavy shit often enough to want a change.
-
Re:All this means
~ the small percentage of felons/turban-wearing men who are actually terrorists?
Good thing all terrorists are turban-wearing, former-felon, males. -
MILK IS RAPE INDUCING
-
Re:Legal precedent?
Yes, because we all know criminals ONLY break in to steal. There has never been a case when criminals broke in and raped or killed someone.
No, criminals would never do that.
-
Re:Of course, they would never ...
I thought they locked thier Unicorn up?
-
Re:It's a government agency, what's the shock?
-
Sandy PetersonA lot of people may not realize this, but Sandy Peterson, level designer for Doom, is a practicing Mormon. I always thought it was annoying that some of the Cult Cop-type Fundies would attack Doom for being Satanic. How is blowing away demons with shotguns and RPGs "Satanic." Black and White should be more objectionable because you can play an evil "Pagan" god, but because Doom fits certain criteria:
1. It's a First Person Shooter.
2. It has great demonic imagery to show on talk shows and sensationalist news reports.
3. It is very well known.
Doom is the game that gets the bad press. (Note: Both games are cool, I would've thought so even back when I was a practicing Catholic.) Really, if Jack Chick made a game, would it be that different than Doom. (Haw, haw!)
On the other hand, all Color Dreams has to do is find Jesus, slightly retool Menace Beach and they have a game they can sell in Christian bookstores Sunday Funday
-
Re:this is insane
"I never thought there are real "mad scientist" types out there"
Never heard of Mengele?
-
Re:Technically.....He wasn't underestimating them as geeks.
Actually, the original thread was entitled "Women Programmers." But I never said s/he was underestimating them. Is that off-topic? Gee, I think if we were not given the liberty to digress slightly from the context of the original thread as long as we keep somewhat near the thread that posts would not be worth reading after the first 2 or 3 becuase they'd be the same thing just different wordings.
he was saying that women tend not to be the socially-maladjusted, emotionally-repressed sort
Anyone who believes that crap should try to think more objectivly.
-
Eugenics vs. Genetic Engineering
Genetic engineering != eugenics. They're two completely different ideas.
That may need a little elaboration, as the two touch on related areas.
Eugenics is a theory which holds that certain individuals are innately superior to others, and that the superior few are vastly outnumbered by the inferior many. If you accept these two premises, then it follows that the inferior many are sure to reproduce faster than the superior few, with the result that the characteristics of the superior individuals will be lost. Basically, a eugenicist sees the world in terms of a conflict between those with big brains and those with big dicks. In order to improve the species, therefore, a eugenicist will attempt to discourage the inferior from procreating, and encourage the superior.
The biggest problem with this theory is figuring out how to tell who's superior and who's inferior. The answer depends on how you ask the question, and on what your beliefs are about what would constitute a "superior" human being. The Nazis believed that a certain physical type was superior -- blond hair, blue eyes, extremely fair skin, what they called "Aryan". They conducted experiments attempting to further these characteristics; for example they would take a pair of brown-eyed twins, and inject chemicals into their eyes in an attempt to change the eye-color to blue. This particular study was carried out at Auschwitz by Josef Mengele, the Angel of Death.
If, on the other hand, you are an American eugenicist, what you do to separate the inferior and the superior is come up with the Intellectual Quotient Test and administer it to all schoolchildren. Those who do well are deemed fit, and allowed to do things like take college prep courses in high school. Those who are deemed unfit are only allowed to take classes in, say, technical arts, thereby preparing them for a lifetime working as drones in a factory. Also, you get laws passed in many states requiring the forced sterilization of any person below a certain IQ level who attempts to reproduce. You might also conduct studies such as the Tuskegee Syphilis Experiments which were begun with the understanding that the subjects would be black because black men are naturally more lascivious than white men, and therefore more likely to have syphilis. These experiments were funded by Congress, continued for four decades, involved hideously painful procedures like spinal fluid taps, and worst of all the subjects were never told that they had syphilis. By the time they found out, it was far too late for any of them to seek treatment.
Eugenics is no longer an accepted theory. It depends on an arbitrary vision of what constitutes "superiority", and led to some truly barbaric practices, both in Germany and in the United States. I do not know how well the theory was received in other countries. I am, however, truly grateful that it is no longer accepted.
Genetic engineering, on the other hand, is a technique for the modification of living creatures by altering their genetic structure. It could very easily be used for eugenics, but has other more benign purposes as well.
There are two kinds of genetic engineering. One involves the modification of an existing organism. For example, take a child afflicted with cystic fibrosis, a genetic disease which causes the lungs to fill with mucus, thereby making it extremely difficult to breathe. That child might be treated by inhaling a vapor of specially created viruses that insert themselves into the affected lung cells and alter their genetic code in such a way that they stop producing the mucus. This is also known as gene therapy.
The other form of genetic engineering involves modifying an organism before it starts growing. Thus you might take a fertilized egg and modify its DNA prior to its implantation in the wall of the mother's womb. Since all cells in the body ultimately derive from that egg, your modification would change the fundamental nature of the adult organism. Genetic modifications have been carried out on plants, for example to make them resistant to a particular disease, or to increase the per-acre yield of a food crop. You yourself have probably eaten such genetically modified food. It is quite common in America; less so in Europe, where there are a great many people who protest against it.
Genetic engineering is a field which has enormous potential for good -- the elimination of genetic diseases like cystic fibrosis. If two people are aware that their child might suffer from CF, they could perform an artificial insemination of an egg which had been "fixed", or avoid the disease simply by choosing an egg that wasn't affected in the first place. On the other hand, genetic engineering also has a staggering potential for abuse. A genetic engineer could not only cure diseases, but also create entirely new ones. The new disease might be used in biological warfare. It is conceivable (though currently not possible) that genetic engineering might be able to create a contagious mutagen -- a virus that would spread throughout the population, and make a particular modification within the bodies of the victims. Imagine if the Nazis had been able to create a virus that would alter the eggs and testicles of those who contracted it. They could have ensured that the next generation would be blond and blue-eyed, against the will of the parents.
Then, of course, there is the danger that we might screw up. We know a lot about genetics now, but there's even more that's not well understood. Sequencing out a full human gene doesn't mean that we understand how all the parts interact with another. There are large portions of the genome that don't seem to do anything (introns) . . . but then again maybe they do, and we just haven't figured it out quite yet. Then there's the fact that one sequence of DNA might control or contribute to three or four different finished structures. If you alter it to give a child green eyes, you might also cause the child to be bald. (That's just an example, I have no idea if the sequences controlling hair production and eye color are at all related.)
Basically, we don't know enough at this point to engage in wholesale manipulation of human genetics. We should not outlaw it -- the genie is out of the bottle, and if we tried outlawing it, the research would merely be undertaken by unethical scientists with little or no oversight. On the other hand, we should NOT perform modifications of human beings without a clear idea of what we're doing and a damn good reason to do it. Giving your kid a particular eye color is NOT a good reason for genetic engineering. Avoiding cystic fibrosis is acceptable. Engineering for more abstract qualities -- musical talent, mathematical skill, linquistic ability -- should be avoided at all costs until we have some idea what the hell we're doing. We don't even know if those qualities are controlled by genes; in the process of trying it out we might very well screw up and make some truly horrible mistakes. Note that many autistic people are also extremely good at math.
Then there are the social issues. Genetic engineering is expensive. If we're not careful, it could become a way for the wealthy to reinforce their dominance over world affairs. It is natural to want to give your child every advantage in life that you can; but doing so can simultaneously disadvantage other people's children.
In short, genetic engineering of humans is problematic. It could provide some unparalleled benefits to the human species . . . but it is also an ethical minefield, and could easily be turned to selfish or downright evil purposes. -
Re:It's the times
Thirty years ago. You mean around the time that
this
and this happened?
Things like this may be happening a bit more today because of the availability of high-powered weapons and yes, a lack of hands-on parenting. But, school shootings (and lousy parenting) didn't just start in the 1990s. What DID start in the 1990s (or thereabouts) was 24 hour/7 days a week, instantaneous-as-it-happens round the word news coverage a la CNN/Fox News/MSNBC and of course, the Web.
It isn't true that horrifying things didn't happen 30 years ago. They clearly did. It's is true that today you are hammered with news in ways that we didn't even dream of back then.
JoAnn -
Damn freedom...it hurts.
"What sucks about giving freedom and liberty to people (or even college students!) - is not knowing ahead of time what they might actually do with it.
You know - like invent a decentralized p2p network and trade music files with it ..."
You know what also sucks about freedom? It comes with consequences. -
Re:Government Funded Racism
-
Crap Artist
This guy reminds of Ira Einhorn , the hippie guru who BS'd his way into lots of "adjunct appointments" like Mr. Lanier's page says he has. Lots of companies thought he was some eccentric genius because he said freaky things and dressed weird.
-
Re:Where are ya, Jimmy?
Well, considering Hoffa was last seen just outside of Detroit, I think it's unlikely that the mobsters killed him, drove him to New York, and tossed him in the Hudson.
It would seem to be an unnecessary risk to dispose of the body that far away.
--T -
Re:Library Royalties
The biggest problem with libraries paying any sort of use fee is that you aren't certain you'll be able to afford it (or even allowed to do so) next week, next year, or next generation. Once a library invests in a physical book, the library has a pretty solid investment. Assuming readers are careful, it will be around in twenty years. (And if readers aren't careful, said readers will get to purchase the replacement.)
An electronic copy with any sort of Digital Restrictions Management is much less certain. Problem one: This year it's ten cents for a library to loan out a book and libraries all jump on. Five years from now, the company in question is having financial problems and jumps the price up to five dollars per loan and suddenly a library can't afford it. This can theoretically be solved by legislating required rates. Of course, publishers won't be happy about such laws and will fight tooth and nail against them. Assuming we get them passed, we run into our next problem, what happens when the publisher goes out of business? As we've seen with technologies like DIVX (the DVD competitor, not the video codec. I curse the stupid video codec people for knowingly conflicting with an existing name, making it extremely difficult to research the DVD competitor...), that this can happen, and your investment in something you don't control can be destroyed. Perhaps it's possible to technically work around the issue, but it would remain illegal (after all, you agreed to always pay for every loan when you purchased the book originally). Can this be solved? Sure, you simply have to require that it's possible to use the files if the company is unable or unwilling to unlock them. This means that the files either need to be DRM-free, or that libraries need to have a backdoor to open them. Again, the content industry will fight tooth and nail. And rightly so, any such backdoor will be eventually leveraged open to widespread illegal copies. Libraries can't afford to pay to have background checks done on librarians to see if they can be trusted with any backdoor? Even if you do the background checks, people slip through the cracks. Just ask the the government about Robert Hanssen. Eventually the secret will leak.
Any effective DRM based system is too problematic to be useful for libraries. That leaves ineffective systems, and most publishers will fight to their dying breath before trying it.
-
Why I run SETI@HOME:
I run SETI@home because I really want to meet Jodi Foster!
-
Re:Government good...corporations baaad...
"1) How do you figure that the government has done nothing illegal? It's surely unconstitutional. "...nor shall any person...be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law." Jose Padilla didn't get his due process. If you answer this post, answer this: How and from where does the Executive branch of the government get the power to imprison and American citizen without even a grand jury, much less a jury trial?"
It not unconstitutional. See here. -
Heaven's Gate
The sites are
/.ed, but after reading the intro, it all sounds like those Heaven's Gate people... they didn't need a real spaceship in 1996 when they all took off on the Hale-Bopp comet. -
Re:Apple. Orange. Know the difference.
Yeah, your right.
The FBI obviously has no reason whatsoever to spy on American citizens. -
Re:Won't work out
Didn't quite get the joke did we?
-
Re:Yes!
Just the other day I saw a news story on an entire state that was being terrorized by a maniac with a kitchen knife!
In the 1888s, London was terrorized by a man with a knife. Perhaps you've heard of him?
In the 1960s, Boston was terrorized by a man weilding articles of clothing as murder weapons.
Sure there are lots of things freely available that are capable of killing people, but how many of those are designed to kill?
Firearms are designed to throw pellets very fast. That's all. The purpose of pellet-throwing - recreation, aggression, self-defense - is up to the person behind the pellet-thrower.
Why is it that to sell my car or house I have to transfer ownership and make sure EVERYBODY knows about it
Tax reasons. That's all.but I can freely sell/trade/give away a gun without a single soul ('cept us, of course) knowing about it?
Registering firearms won't make you any safer. Gun control laws keep guns away from violent criminals about as well as drug laws keep heroin away from junkies. And just like drug laws, they do more to harrass and endanger good citizens than to actually control dangerous people.
The only thing registering firearms makes easier is confiscating firearms, which defintely makes you less safe.
-
Re:Point by Point breakdown
Because a little piece of paper called the US constitution defines freedom of speech as something the "government" may NOT take away NO MATTER HOW IMPORTANT a situation is.
Well, unless you shout fire in a crowded theater.
Or, they classify what you say (or write) as obscenity, which is illegal.
Or, maybe they'll just convict you of conspiracy, though you've committed no actual crime.
Or, they'll hold you and your friends for 12 hours and search your car, because of what someone thought they heard you say.
Yeah, God bless America. Land of the free^H^H^H^H.
-
Billionaire Boys - Bad Name Choice, Murder (OT)
I'm really surprised that Wired chose to use the term "Billionare Boy's Cup", since it sounds like a reference to the notorious "Billionaires Boy Club." For those who don't recall the name, I point you here for details about mind control, investment strategies, and the grusome murders and kidnappings perpetuated by Mr. Joe Hunt and his followers.