Slashdot Mirror
Domain: giphy.com
Stories and comments across the archive that link to giphy.com.
Comments · 54
-
Let's talk...
...NSA here, please ignore that little feature, nothing to see here!
https://media.giphy.com/media/...
https://tenor.com/view/fizzer1... -
Re:recognition
Hopefully nobody wears Spock Socks... https://media.giphy.com/media/...
-
can they use this lock in ram / cpus?
Just think of this with tim cooks face and the word NON APPLE HARDWARE no mac os for you.
-
Re:Obviously supervised by ...
Oblig, damn you parent, https://giphy.com/gifs/ministr... John Cleese forever.
-
"Missed revenue"
-
Thanks Giphy!
-
Re:Fascist mods
Obligatory go DIAF comment that's needed in these kinds of threads so we can all pad our victim card.
Hey! I haven't received my victim card! I'm being discriminated against! Disenfranchised! Mother!
-
Re:Touchscreens?
"There is a panel of buttons"
go look at the pictures, their panel of buttons doesn't look like actual physical buttons but the same technology as the touch screen.
-
Re:Cheaper Later?
-
Re:Uber Conspiracy
-
Re:News from the future
-
Crybaby Trump throwing yet another fit
WAAAH! Jeff Bezos is richer and a more successful businessman than I am, WAAAH!
This is what Trump looks like when he's talking about Jeff Bezos
Donald Trump acts like a spoiled-rotten narcissistic 5-year-old most of the time already, but you confront him with someone who is clearly and objectively richer, more successful, and a better overall businessman? He loses his shit and lashes out in a childlike temper-tantrum like this, which is going to cost you, the U.S. taxpayer, as a totally unnecessary 'audit' of the USPS is conducted. Meanwhile there are matters vitally important to the Nation as a whole that are being ignored in favor of Trumps' ego and vanity. Isn't enough enough already? Trump voters: what were you thinking!? -
Re:Ahh, sanded jeans.
What? Someone who doesn't get fashion on Slashdot?
-
Re:Is it illegal to tweet?
-
This idiot is their own stated problem.
From the piece of drivel written
In other words, the internet economy simply isn’t ready for a scenario where IPv6 is used everywhere and NAT is abandoned. We are stuck with what we have.
That is exactly the crap I hear that stops IPv6 migration. This person literally is the reason why they are lamenting IPv6's slow adoption. But that said, so we have this technical argument for why the "web" is dying, even though it's an Internet argument. But let's backtrack to this little gem.
The advent of NAT routers also allowed for that intermediate computer to become a guardian and protect other computers from some dangers of the open internet.
If that's what you are doing, you are doing it mostly wrong. That's not a function of NAT, that's a flipping function of *routing*. You can literally have all kinds of globally addressable IP addresses on systems, connect them, and then have 100% of them respond to 0% of the incoming requests. You literally do not need NAT for that and if that's the sole reason you are using NAT (to be more secure), you more than likely shouldn't have your job. That's not saying NAT doesn't have a place or anything, but that is me saying that if your rationale is solely for security, you will find lots of folks that will tell you otherwise. Again, NAT has a place, time, and use, but this person writing the piece is missing every single point of that. Now I know everyone is going to foam or spout with their opinion on NAT, but you have to snap out of it because, remember these are "Internet" issues not "web" issues and as you keep reading, if you aren't keeping that point in your head, you'll just get sucked into this argument of "NAT is awesome v. F*** NAT!" So I digress, let's actually continue.
It also meant that some computers were first-class citizens on the internet, while other computers were subordinates. In addition, the scarcity of IP addresses caused them to be considered valuable assets, and so it became a business opportunity. IP addresses are being sold so that some computers can become first-class citizens on the internet.
I had no actual problem with this point until that last part I highlighted. That's when my brain snapped out of it and was like, "Wait, this has absolutely nothing to do with why Facebook, Google, et al are these massive black holes." This person is literally making this overly complicated, but weak attempt to dumb down an argument about the web, on technical merits that have nothing to do with what reasonable people would call "the web". And that point became even more clear here.
As a consequence, the internet has allowed intermediate computers to rule. These are like parasites that have grown too large to remove without killing the host. The technical flaw that favored intermediate computers prefigured a world where middlemen business models thrive. Google and Facebook connect consumers with advertisement publishers and charge fees for each ad.
Oh Mother of Stars that's eight hundred times pi radians of all kinds of wrong!! IPv4's short comings have **NOTHING** to do with why the big boys on the Internet are who they are. It is at this point your brain should be saying, "This person has about as much clue as to what they are saying as a canine on the ISS has of managing the station." I assure you it does not get better as it goes.
Novel peer-to-peer protocols such as IPFS and Dat help replace HTTP and make the web a content-centered cyberspace. This way the link to an image can be something like QaPdNnDWRLF1b — a so-called hash of the image, summarizing it — instead of mywebsite.com/pic.jpeg so that even if mywebsite.com servers are removed,
-
When machine vision fails...
Kinney gets machine gunned.
-
Re:Waiting for the bubble to burst...
-
Infinite Bypass Detected
Security has infinite bypasses. As soon as a new layer is added another method appears to circumvent. Life, uh, finds a way.
-
Re:Maybe...?
How the fuck is it faster and less crash prone than safari on iOS then? Christ, Apple, get your shit together.
-
Re:US production
There's no education problem in America
Uh, really? -
EXTREME FAGGOTRY
These assholes that are buying up extensions and corrupting them like this need to be curb-stomped.
-
Re:Because
Just understanding the laws of physics gives any STEM grad a huge advantage over a liberal arts students in bullshit detection.
Critical thinking in liberal arts schools is just another indoctrination. Test is how well they agree with the teachers opinions.How many times have you seen a liberal arts major accept obvious bullshit because they don't understand 'conservation of energy' (just picking one example). It's rife.
I don't often do this on SD because there's no images but: No.
-
as macbook pro owner, this is my response:
-
Re: So...
-
Re:Marx was completely wrong (trigger warning)
According to him, for example, 8 hours of work by a ditch-digger is equally valuable as 8 hours of an engineer or a pastry-chef. Equally valuable and therefore to be equally rewarded. As I said, wrong
But equally valuable to the workers.
The reason was Capitalism's ability to produce wealth — more than any other regime — and enough of it to keep the workers and the farmers satisfied, to the dismay of the Marxists. It is this satisfaction they've been trying to erode with varying success ever since — with made-up "outrages" over non-issues like "gender equality"... See also Marxism 2.0.
Actually. it's the capitalists who are eroding away the wealth of the workers and farmers. Haven't you noticed the disappearance of the middle class and increasing income inequality over the last few decades?
-
Re:Marx was completely wrong (trigger warning)
it was because we began fixing things
Nope. It is because he was wrong. Fundamentally...
According to him, for example, 8 hours of work by a ditch-digger is equally valuable as 8 hours of an engineer or a pastry-chef. Equally valuable and therefore to be equally rewarded. As I said, wrong
aka the progressive movement of the early 1900s that sought to correct the excesses of the gilded age.
The progressive movement of 1900 had little to do with what's known as "progressive" today. But if you are willing to defend, what those guys did, let's start with the Prohibition...
*boat gets fixed* Mi: See? The boat didn't sink. Therefore, Marx was wrong.
No. The reason was Capitalism's ability to produce wealth — more than any other regime — and enough of it to keep the workers and the farmers satisfied, to the dismay of the Marxists. It is this satisfaction they've been trying to erode with varying success ever since — with made-up "outrages" over non-issues like "gender equality"... See also Marxism 2.0.
-
Re:"Progressive" solution to inequality
Then GOP USA=Sudan & Somalia.
First of all, Sudan has (almost) nothing in common with Somalia — if anything, Sudan's government is too authoritarian. The below applies to Somalia only:
They have no government at all and anarchy
Somalia's problems stem from having a Collectivist government in the past — they are simply at the more advanced stage of what Venezuela is facing.
Both countries are a libertarian paradise.
Wrong. Yours is such a silly meme, it has been debunked numerous times.
But you knew that already — your aim was to portray my argument about Venezuela equally invalid as yours. Well, they don't compare. Because unlike Somalia, Venezuela was repeatedly and actively praised by the very same people calling for the US to "accept progressive principles". Hugo Chavez was a darling of the world's Socialists. Heck, some of these morons continue to adore Maduro!
When I asked DogDude, what would President Sanders do differently from El Presidente Chavez, he got all indignant and would not answer — nor would any other Sanders-sympathizers I've encountered. But Republicans and Libertarians would list a multitude of differences between Somalia and what they would do, given a chance.
As I said, whatever is wrong with the US healthcare, "adopting progressive principles" is not a solution. It would by like treating a headache with suicide.
-
Re:Easy
-
Re: Uber is just rotten
-
Re: Why is Holocaust Denial Such a Huge Deal?
I'd like to solve the puzzle...
-
Re:Reddit?
That's not hard when even your "front page" filters topics so that they never appear. The "everybody gets to vote on every message" model is inherently flawed, but Reddit's moderation and site management are flawed as well.
-
Oh Snap!
-
Re:Lini batteries
Still need to work out a few problems with the Plutonium-Lithium battery I'm developing. Those pesky laws about who can buy the raw materials is making development difficult.
Psst! Wanna buy some uranium?
Radioactive isotopes also, at bargain prices!
PS: I'm SO disappointed that United Nuclear took down their
https://media.giphy.com/media/...
Strat
-
Re:The list sucks
I'm sure someone will come up with an exception
*cough* Bakemonogatari? Or, worse.... Nisemonogatari?
Heck, even recent stuff Flip Flappers (2016) – a masterpiece of animation prowess, Ghibli meets Gainax (and a total commercial flip - er, flop) pulls stuff like this chick.
-
Re: Firefly
Neither is Wash!
-
President Wildcard
It's premature to say what Mr. Trump will actually do. He has given anti-trust some lip service, which suggests he'd preserve NN in order prevent big telecoms from also controlling big media. But whether he follows through is another matter.
While he may prefer trust-busting actions, he may trade it away for something else that he wants from Congress, being the deal-maker he is. The up-side is that he may be willing to cut deals with Democrats also, but it would only work for issues that divide the GOP, for the Democrats don't have enough seats to produce a viable bill otherwise.
Trump is unlike every other president. Burn the history books and get the popcorn out. I don't know whether Trump will take us to heaven, hell, the loony bin, or something in between; but I am certain it will be an interesting ride. Don't forget to buckle up, and keep your hands inside at all times.
-
Re:flawed logic
This is how I imagine most libscum like you when you parrot obviously debunked lies and demmy talking points from last year: Over and over
-
Firefox 49?
Allow me to respond in a way you can appreciate.
-
Re:Islam is the problem, not encryption
It's what makes him kinda special.
0.0 -
Re:LOL - no no no no!!
-
Re:I assumed this was already a default
Obligatory image
-
Re:A more accurate headline
even the rats that developed tumors lived longer than rats not exposed to the radiation.
So, the radiation makes them into super rats? Oh no!
-
Re:Hold on
The short answer is: Yes.
The long answer is: [bot insert]
-
Re: familiar
I think he's recommending military applications of pizza technology. It's a workable idea. Leave serverely overheated hot pockets on the enemy battlefield, enemy soldiers can't resist picking them up and biting into them once the outer crust cools (while the interior is still as hot as the inside of an operating fusion reactor), and then this happens.
It'll work until new treaties outlaw the use of hot pocket weapons as a war crime.
Even then, the technology could help medics cauterize wounds on the field. Dude's bleeding out through two severed thighs? Extrude some overheated hot pocket cheese from an insulated container onto the wound!
-
Re:because in windows broken security is a feature
Score one more for MS
-
Re:Unavoidable
yummm, fish taco. I hope it's not made with blinky.
-
Re:Trapper keeper ready to absorb
I guess this one is still relevant?
-
Re:Eye contact
I think we will have to mount something like this to the hood of every autonomous vehicle.
It's important to make people feel at ease with new technology. -
Re:you can buy yellowcake on Amazon
But do you have some in a special CIA napkin?
-
Re:consumerism wins!
