Slashdot Mirror

If you use a "hard drug" and become addicted to it and can afford your habit, that's your problem.

No. I totally agree, but how often does that happen?

Having something in your pocket that other people disapprove of is not a crime and has no victim.

I see your point, but my point is that there are so many ifs and buts that the discussion about "consenting adults" is mainly a theoretical discussion. Reality is different. In daily life people are just not free to do what they want. In general, yes, but not as a rule. Take gay marriage between two consenting adults.

Most drug users are not able to support their need by them selves and cause many problems for society. Or to put it, they're not able to behave along the line of consenting adults so no freedom of drug use.

Apart from that, the war on drugs is a waste of money. Is that money was spent on prevention, drugs related crime and taking care (basic shelter, clean needles, some medical care) of the drug user. there would probably even be a lot of money left for these people: http://www.infowars.com/101m-americans-get-food-aid-from-federal-govt/

This is also about Censorship and Control. Yes torrents are used to distribute some pirated content. But they are also used to distribute home made videos, free educational videos and so on. I have a .torrent site where I mainly distribute videos by Alex Jones / http://infowars.com/ and I can legally distribute everything on that site. I had Google Adsense on it for a while but one day they sent me an e-mail saying that having a .torrent file on your site violates their policy. It apparently doesn't matter to Google _what_ you distribute with a torrent, just using torrents is "bad". That's as stupid as saying "using http is against our policy" regardless of what you serve, but that's the "do evil" corporation for you. The Pirate Bay may have some "bad" content, but there's also a whole lot of important _legal_ content there. You can't easily censor videos distributed using BitTorrent. BitTorrent is important for free speech and free thought. I do understand why Disney wants to shut down sites who distribute videos with information that goes against their propaganda, but it's not alright.

These machines not only provide, supposedly, security for our air travelers but they also provide fun and entertainment
for the TSA employees as well.

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2010/05/06/tsa-worker-arrested-jokes-fight-size-genitalia/

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/woman-body-scanned-times-tsa-dallas-airport-cute-figure-article-1.1022803

http://www.infowars.com/ex-tsa-screener-officers-laughing-at-your-naked-image/

We all knew this kind of stuff would happen and it has and let's not forget the guy who really pushed these forward
was at one time in charge of the DHS, Chertoff, represented rapidscan... http://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2010/01/airport-scanner-scam

This whole excercise will be looked back upon with two possible outcomes: Rational beings will once again govern and they'll be looked upon as an assault on civil liberties or The status quo will be maintained into the future and you won't be able to go anywhere, be online and transact any business anywhere without at least 20 or thirty government snoops tracking your every movement. Frankly the way things are going, the latter is probably the outcome we'll all be living with shortly.

http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2012/05/google-nsa-secrecy-upheld/

http://arstechnica.com/business/2006/10/8105/

http://www.infowars.com/google-exposed-as-nsa-front/

http://epic.org/foia/epic_v_nsa_google.html

Here we go: citation 1

Or another one: citation 2

(Expletive) a boston bominb wait till u see the (expletive) I do, I’ma be famous rapping, and beat every murder charge that comes across me!

Assuming I fill in the two blanks with f and s, I way I interpret this statement is an artist saying he's going to be more famous in the news that the recent Boston bombing. Perhaps in poor taste, but am I missing something? How can this be misconstrued as a bomb threat landing up to 20 years in prison?

The best explanation I could find was the following: http://www.infowars.com/high-school-student-faces-20-years-for-obama-facebook-threat/

I do want to make clear he did not make a specific threat against the school or any particular individuals but he did threaten to kill a bunch of people and specifically mentioned the Boston Marathon and the White House. The threat was disturbing enough for us to act and I think our officers did the right thing

From my interpretation the lyric was intended to refer to killing those who caused harm, i.e. invoking vengeance against terrorists, not becoming a terrorist.



I truly feel sorry for this individual. There will be no mercy by the prosecution or jury. I'm hoping the ACLU jumps on this case for it to have a sliver of a chance.

When the economy melted down in Greece the price of food became a concern

http://www.infowars.com/desperation-greece-to-allow-sale-of-expired-foods-to-citizens/

To have an Android device you purchased (or rented) patched is not a human right. Maybe, it is a consumer right, and should be defended by consumer-rights advocates, but ACLU is not (supposed to be) one. That they prefer to concentrate on this instead of on one of the rights enumerated by the Bill of Rights, is telling, how low the organization has fallen.

Whatever you say about NRA, clearly, their efforts aren't sufficient, because the right to keep and bear arms (the one, you know, that shall not be infringed) is routinely denied, and even in the most liberal states (like Texas), is treated not as right, but as a mere privilege (subject to the Executive's approval, to be denied or withdrawn on a whim).

Now, since you tried to make this about me, my own story with ACLU is this -- when I gave them money (and I never gave to NRA in my life) by becoming a member a few years ago, a month later I got a subscription invitation to "The Nation" (a fairly disgusting ultra-Left magazine). It was sent to the specially-tagged address I used, when registering with ACLU. So, no, they aren't seeing any of my money again — not until they prove, that they are willing to stand up for the Constitution and our rights.

They can begin by challenging the government's authority to kick people out of their houses and search them, as just happened en-mass in Boston.

Don't know, but this might help explain.

http://www.infowars.com/photos-private-military-operatives-hired-to-work-the-boston-marathon-with-black-backpacks-radiation-detectors-tactical-gear/

Tho I hate linking to nuts at infowars.com they are the only ones posting the pics of the Craft guys:

http://www.infowars.com/fbi-ignores-men-with-backpacks-at-scene-of-boston-bombings/

Craft is contracted out at many events. This isn't the first nor will it be the last.

For the disabled to be harassed equally, they would need to be tackeled to the ground when they refused to stop talking.

But all kidding aside, I think there is a real sickness in the TSA, It doesn't take long to find articles and more articles showing the TSA's abuse of disabled people.

More goodies here:

http://www.infowars.com/cashless_society.htm

False flag operations are extremely risky, and don't happen as often as you would think.

... and don't happen as often as you would think.

Did you know Texas Real Estate Agents are involved in a scam to create a new housing bubble to exploit?

Britam was hacked recently and some of the emails (that they claim were fake) hinted this was in the works. http://www.infowars.com/hack-reveals-washington-approved-plan-to-stage-chemical-weapons-attack-in-syria/

3 years ago.

I'm a born US citizen inside the US. 3 years ago I had been blocked for 24 hours from all google owned sites, including youtube, for searching for the 'wrong' Chinese terms.

Like China and Russia, the United States has political prisoners. Barrett Brown is now serving a 100 year sentence for, you could say, being a political blogger. He didn't leak anything, just published and linked to material that others leaked; same as New York Times and google.

Soldiers/secret police are allowed to yank a citizen off the road to make them disappear. Potentially forever, thanks to the NDAA bill that Obama signed it law. Here's a video of precisely that happening during G20, dated 9/24/2009. The video depicts camouflaged men dragging someone (a protestor?) into an unmarked gray car. The car then drives off to the left. Justin Hallman, a student was recently investigated by the FBI for reposted the video as part of a school project. If the military G20 arrest was fake, why would the FBI bother to knock on the door of the person who reposted it?

Apparently most slashfags have voted for hope and change.

I wonder what the breaking point event will be for the intelligent Slashdot community, where you will actually get mad rather than diverting the issue and believing nothing will be abused.

Wait until one day the civilian national security force in their brown uniforms, armed with 1.6 billion rounds of ammo start marching on the streets the same time the King announcing the suspension of the Constitution.

When Slashdot is full of people like these , you will understand why history keep repeating itself.

I do the same thing but I make sure I'm nice and sweaty before doing so. I also push back when waiting that they have me stand over by the Bag XRay Machines. NFW am I standing next to those Radiation Hazards. Flying is bad enough exposure and frankly I still haven't seen an independent study on the safety of these machines by the people screened or by the people using them. http://www.infowars.com/cancer-surges-in-body-scanner-operators-tsa-launches-cover-up/ The privacy matters are also there as well, so look, if the alternative to the scanner finding "something" is to do a pat down, then just go ahead and do it.

It's time to abolish the TSA, they're useless and could be replaced by a few well trained police dogs trained to sniff out explosives and contraband.

That will all be changed by brain implants. Now we can ensure the trusted path: Internet, local Computer, HDMI connection, Monitor, Eyeballs. The monitor will output an encoded picture that the eyes will register and the brain implant will decode it to your occipital lobe Later it will erase any memory of the video if the producer set the broadcast flag.

"I wonder what the breaking point event will be for the intelligent Slashdot community, where you will actually get mad rather than diverting the issue and believing nothing will be abused."

Wait until one day the civilian national security force in their brown uniforms, armed with 1.6 billion rounds of ammo start marching on the streets the same time the King announcing the suspension of the Constitution.

When Slashdot is full of people like these , you will understand why history keep repeating itself.

Good point. Or, ten or twenty trillion US$ in paper wealth disappeared as an externality of banking risk that some bankers made billions from and caused suffering for tens of millions of people:
http://www.counterpunch.org/2013/01/18/the-parable-of-the-frogs/
"What does it take to produce large-scale social change? Most historians, if you catch them in an honest moment, will admit that the popular levers of social change, such as education or legislation, are bogus; they don't really amount to very much. What does make a difference -- and then only potentially -- is massive systemic breakdown, such as occurred in the United States in the fall of 2008. It was the greatest market crash since 1929, leading to widespread unemployment (something like 18% of the population, in real -- as opposed to official -- statistics*) and the loss of billions of dollars in retirement savings. In fact, the crash wiped out $11.1 trillion in household wealth, and this is not counting the several trillion lost in stock market investments. It had been many decades since the middle class found itself in soup kitchens, and yet there they were. In the face of all this, however, very little seems to have changed. Americans are still committed to the dream of unlimited abundance as a "reasonable" goal, when in reality it is (and always has been) the dream of an addict. President Obama's upwards of $19 trillion bailout and stimulus plan funneled money into the very banking establishment that gave us the disaster; it rescued the wealthy, not those who really needed the money. And while he could have appointed economic advisers such as Paul Krugman and Joseph Stiglitz (both Nobel laureates), who would have attempted to put the nation on a different economic path, he chose instead two traditional neoliberal ideologues, Timothy Geithner and Lawrence Summers, who believe in the very policies that led to the crash. "Change we can believe in" never sounded more hollow."

No doubt some of this is spin, but there is some truth in here:
http://www.infowars.com/100-million-poor-people-in-america-and-39-other-facts-about-poverty-that-will-blow-your-mind/

One of the links there goes to:
http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2011/12/15/9461848-dismal-prospects-1-in-2-americans-are-now-poor-or-low-income
"Squeezed by rising living costs, a record number of Americans -- nearly 1 in 2 -- have fallen into poverty or are scraping by on earnings that classify them as low income."

I'm not saying the average US citizen is as bad off as most people in North Korea in material ways -- just that there remains a lot of unnecessary suffering in the USA which is being justified by a crazy ideological bubble. For example, if the USA redistributed half of the US GDP equally as a "basic income", then every citizen would have US$2000 a month, and the other half could be competed over. It's only a cultural mythological bubble that keeps most of the USA from seeing this:
http://web.archive.org/web/20120102011454/http://www.conceptualguerilla.com/?q=node/402
"That rationalization came in the form of a brand new science known as economics, which included a brand new mythology."

Despite books like this by Moshe Adler:
"Economics for the Rest of Us: Debunking the Science that Makes Life Dismal"
http://www.amazon.com/Economics-Rest-Us-Debunking-Science/dp/B007F7WKV8
"Why do contemporary economists consider food subsidies in starving countries, rent control in rich cities, and health insurance every

In related news, he vehemently criticized the President's kill-list:

http://www.infowars.com/obamas-kill-list-critic-found-dead-in-new-york-city/

Do not criticize the kill-list, ever.

Yeah, we know, if you dare to speak out about the President's kill-list, or try to make any sort of pro-gun statement, ZOG will have you killed.

In related news, he vehemently criticized the President's kill-list:

http://www.infowars.com/obamas-kill-list-critic-found-dead-in-new-york-city/

Do not criticize the kill-list, ever.

They didn't charge this guy with recording: http://www.infowars.com/california-man-jailed-four-days-for-recording-cops/
Instead it was "resisting, delaying and obstructing an officer" and not having reflectors on his bicycle pedals.

Police policy means shit if the officers are not trained appropriately.
http://www.photographyisnotacrime.com/ is a good clearinghouse for stories about police & private securitywho don't know how to do their jobs.

Hey funny guy, the article mentions they object on religious beliefs. So only criminals or animals make use of RFID? Walmart clothes must be criminals. I certainly hope you appreciate the irony if you use a mobile phone, since that actually broadcasts your location instead of simply responding.

Read the letter linked from infowars:
http://static.infowars.com/2012/11/i/general/Hernandez_RFID-ID-john_jay_letter.jpg

"In the event that you change your stance on wearing the ID with the battery and chip removed as has been offered to you on two occasions, we will be more than willing to rescind this withdrawal notice."

That seems reasonable, except for the fact that she was also told her original pre-RFID card would be valid for all 4 years she was enrolled at the school.

Everything aside, the zero tolerance policies that most school administrators (officially or unofficially) adopt is an injustice all its own.

The number of posts calling the president racists terms probably is 100 times more than any of those other folks.

Citation or retraction please.

A google search turned up this quote:

This reporter searched Twitter with several specialized Twitter search engines using the keywords “Romney,” “Obama,” “kill,” “shoot,” “riot” and other terms to denote violence, and found scores of original Tweets and re-Tweets advocating violent behavior against both the President and Romney. Many more of the Tweets, though, were, in fact, directed against Romney.

And these pages -- don't even bother reading the articles just scroll down through the tweets:

http://twitchy.com/2012/10/14/death-threats-against-mitt-romney-proliferate/
http://www.prisonplanet.com/obama-supporters-continue-threats-to-riot-assassinate-romney.html
http://www.infowars.com/threats-to-assassinate-romney-explode-after-debate/

While these are specifically about threats against Romney, it certainly doesn't suggest a dearth of such threats. Hell searching for "twitter threats obama" turns up page after page of threats against Romney with the occasional link to something against Obama.

His State Department blocked the import of M1 Carbines from South Korea and the Civilian Marksmanship Program is pretty much out of them, so he's been more successful at blocking U.S. citizens from acquiring weapons which he has chosen to disallow than many of the things which he promised in his initial campaign.

For those keeping score, while he's batting better than .500, here's a list of 96 promises which he hasn't made any real headway on:

http://promises.nationaljournal.com/completeness/0/

Some specific ones of interest here:

  - most transparent government --- http://www.propublica.org/article/many-govt-agencies-still-missing-required-transparency-sites0224
  - post bills online before signing them --- http://promises.nationaljournal.com/ethics-reform/post-bills-online-before-signing-them/
  - promised copyright reform, signed CISPA --- http://www.infowars.com/obama-opposes-cispa-but-will-sign-it-anyway/

Not to mention, It seems it's completely NOT the largest.

http://www.infowars.com/indias-gargantuan-biometric-database-raises-big-questions/

Man Crushed by Steamroller On Orders of Chinese Officials

I know its not a prison camp, but it is an area where you can get shot at for walking.

Plus if there are aliens there, they are being treated badly.

Plus if you havent heard there are lots of national parks where entry is strictly enforced as NO ENTRY.

http://www.infowars.com/house-gop-backs-homeland-security-powers-for-natl-parks-in-border-zone/

Or not smiling enough. Parkinson’s Sufferer Arrested for ‘Not Smiling’ at Olympic Men’s Cycling Race.

Eventually, when all you are permitted is a single-shot rimfire, what use will it be for you?

Virtually none whatsoever, I imagine. All the more reason why it's so crucial that the "brainwashed left" see past the false left-right paradigm and realize before it's too late that they've fallen for the lie that guns aren just for the "brainwashed right." History clearly shows that they're for anyone who wants to be able to protect themselves and their loved ones and have a faint chance of being able to preserve what little remains of their liberty.

I strongly suggest that everyone check this out, regardless of their political "assumptions."

This is equally relevant.

Comparing a network world blog response to the infowars response network world cleaned house pointing out state sponsored terrorism scare mongering, highlighting a program aimed at conditioning the public to accept more intrusion and overreach to combat the terrorism boogieman.

All of this while Alex and crew pissed away their opportunity on the phrase "real survivors" (soundex "real men") followed by a list of sponsors and reciprocating friends.

http://www.infowars.com/cdcs-zombie-apocalypse-propaganda/

Sad... really quite sad.

http://articles.cnn.com/2012-05-17/world/world_mexico-decapitated-bodies_1_drug-war-gulf-cartel-monterrey?_s=PM:WORLD
http://www.infowars.com/35-decapitations-in-past-six-weeks-near-us-mexico-border/
http://www.bestgore.com/beheading/chainsaw-beheading-video-sinaloa-cartel-members-decapitated-mexico/
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-latin-america-18063328
--
And so on.

...in three, two, one.. It'll be on http://www.infowars.com/ within a few hours. Shame the blind squirrel occasionally finds a nut.... (take that "nut " pun, invert it, and well never mind). We need to thaw Ian Flemming's brain and ask it...

Saw this a while back, seems relevant.

http://www.escapistmagazine.com/videos/view/the-big-picture/2541-Feeding-Edge

Pretty much EVERYTHING you eat today is genetically modified on some level. To expect consumers to decide what genetic modifications are acceptable and which ones aren't, is a very tall order for the layman. If only we had some government group to Administrate the Food sold in this country. They could oversee medicine too. We would call them the FDA and they ALREADY EXIST.

.. and they are in the pocket of firms like monsanto. GM soybeans were approved in the us without even going through proper testing. I'm sure you don't find it interesting that outside the US (EU) for example where the testing WAS done, the gm crops were banned... hmm, wonder why that happened?

It's worse than you think. The GM soybeans were approved right after the bush administration appointed a (now former) vice president of Monsanto corporation as the head of the FDA. The GM crops were subsequently approved with no testing, and no testing is required or even allowed to be performed on them. You can read more about it here (or hundreds of other sites, use google). http://www.infowars.com/help-stop-former-monsanto-vp-from-attaining-top-position-at-the-fda/

This Monsanto scam is quite possibly one of the worst things done to the American people by it's own government... or maybe not, we'll never really know since we're not allowed to perform the necessary testing. If there was nothing to hide, then I think testing would not be banned.

This stuff is BAD news for humans.

Anything the government of the USofA says, is probably (98% certainty) a lie, anything it (seems) to be doing is probably (70% certainty) a smoke screen/diversion for somthing quite different!

What happened to "closing Gitmo" or "America doesn't torture" or along a different tack "the public option" or even more to the point "occupy"?

And why not Google (FEMA Camp coffins http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m3zSDdm-SHI) or (750 million rounds of DHS Ammo http://www.infowars.com/dhs-to-purchase-another-750-million-rounds-of-ammo/) and to paraphrase the milk commercial "Got nightmares"?

I stand corrected, the only flight to happen on 9/11 was delivering antivenom to Miami. The Bin Laden family however was flown out of the U.S. on a 747 from Miami on 9/19 while all other air traffic in the country was in full lock down and the FBI new the plane had be chartered by Osama Bin Laden. The White House managed all authorizations. You can read more about it here.

I'll match your anecdote with one of my own:
How about this?

My personal anecdote: I'm prior military. Target shooting and stress (combat) shooting are hobbies. I've shot along side various law enforcement officers and, with a few exceptions, they suck. I put 1000 rounds a month minimum through my weapons; some of them fire 200 rounds a year. They have no control, and some even fucking flinch. It's pathetic.

The point: being a cop doesn't make you qualified to engage targets in a populated environment.
Also, your Zimmerman example is lame: Zimmerman's rounds found their target. There were no bystanders hit.

1000 times this. They succeeded in getting a vaccine for a NON-COMMUNICABLE disease mandatory for girls in Texas (since partially reversed), but are still trying to get it to be mandatory for boys, too.

There are rumblings of money changing hands in California over the passage of the so-called "Gardasil Bill".

Even the Wall Street Journal says mandatory Gardasil injections are a bad idea.

I can't wait for fully automated cars. It would relieve us of another monotonous task. But I guarantee this will meet great resistance from those who want the freedom to cut people off and talk on their mobile phones while driving.

I think more resistance would come from city/counties/states. Tickets are a big source of revenue. Self driving cars won't do things that could get someone pulled over. They also wouldn't get excuses to search someone's car and then use civil asset forfeiture laws when a roach found in the ash tray or just steal someone's cash because it might be "drug money" or some other bs.

FB is fucked on multiple levels, and I could go into that in detail, however if you really want to be disgusted with them, read what they did to "regular" small time investors:
http://www.infowars.com/wall-street-bankers-secretly-scammed-facebook-ipo-buyers/

Microsoft's business practices, and the extent to which Gates was personally responsible for them, is not the issue. What you said was that the Gates foundation exists to turn a personal profit and that its assets will not be distributed but instead given to wealthy individuals. You went so far as to hint that it might be some sort of extortion:

The first time is free. Just wait until the next health crisis, see what fucking happens.

Restating that he is "engaging in for-profit economic activity that benefits him directly" isn't evidence - it's just the same assertion that you made the first time. I've looked around on Google for information going either way and found nothing of note.There was an article pointing out that conflicts of interest are possible in foundations; the closest I could find to someone alleging that the Foundation is a front for Gates' private profit was an InfoWars article that creates an imagined conflict by confusing shares held by Gates and shares held by the Gates Foundation, before going on to claim that

Bill Gates, son of a top Planned Parenthood official , is in league with a group of wealthy eugencists working to reduce the world’s population,

a claim which, to my mind at least, does very little for the credibility of its author.

I thought previously that there was no information available on Bill Gates' personal shareholdings. However I now find that he holds his shares through Cascade Investment LLC, the filings of which are available at sec.gov. There's a digest of its current holdings at GuruFocus - I haven't checked its accuracy. What it appears to show, however, is a portfolio that is not in any way focused on big pharma. I wasn't able to find any pharmaceutical conflicts, either directly or indirectly, by comparing that list to the Foundation's grant history, although I admit that I haven't gone through everything - I simply don't have time. One holding that I imagine will be criticised is Monsanto. I don't know how large that holding is, and while you could find out by going through all the filings I'm not inclined to; if the strongest claim that can be made is that Mr Gates set up the Gates Foundation and gave away something approaching $30bn in the hope that he would somehow make it back on Monsanto stocks then I think the argument rather defeats itself.

As regards my "honourable" remark, it was a rough paraphrase of a comment made by our Prime Minister, David Cameron, in the House of Commons and which I thought was rather apposite. It wasn't meant to offend - and in any case, if you are concerned about your honour there is plenty of time for you to salvage it by providing evidence of your claim that the Gates Foundation is an attempt for Bill Gates to make a private profit.

Quoting somebody else(below)
>>>Its not like this article is any more inaccurate than any other report they make. It's entertainment, not news...

This is pretty true of ALL the Cable "news" channels. I have a link where an MSNBC reporter brags that he has no idea what "Bilderberg group" is and has no intention of finding out. In other words, he's proudly admitting he likes to be ignorant. Not much of a reporter.

And no I am not saying "It's okay that FOX distorts." I'm saying that the other channels are NO better and distorting the news just as often. Remember: NBC was caught editing the Trayvon 911 audio and later had to apologize for it (a mistake they claimed; it was no mistake). They also got caught editing video to make a black guy carrying a gun, look like a white guy carrying a gun (and then reported it was a whole crowd of racists wanting to kill President Obama).

Sneering MSNBC Anchor:
"I'm Way Too Lazy" To Research Bilderberg
http://www.infowars.com/sneering-msnbc-anchor-im-way-too-lazy-to-research-bilderberg/

Quoting somebody else(below)
>>>Its not like this article is any more inaccurate than any other report they make. It's entertainment, not news...

This is pretty true of ALL the Cable "news" channels. I have a link where an MSNBC reporter brags that he has no idea what "Bilderberg group" is and has no intention of finding out. In other words, he's proudly admitting he likes to be ignorant. Not much of a reporter. (Sorry this is the only copy of the video I have..... it's about halfway down.)

Sneering MSNBC Anchor:
âoeIâ(TM)m Way Too Lazyâ To Research Bilderberg
http://www.infowars.com/sneering-msnbc-anchor-im-way-too-lazy-to-research-bilderberg/

Al-Qaeda is a former CIA asset. In fact they are still using them in Egypt and Syria to exert regime change. They don't want to *really* want hurt their friend/ally by stealing money..... just put on a little show to impress the Americans back home.

1 - http://www.infowars.com/syrian-girl-natos-secret-agenda-in-syria/
2 - http://www.infowars.com/al-qaeda-rebel-pictured-with-un-observers-in-syria/
3 - http://www.infowars.com/cia-double-agent-cia-and-british-intelligence-created-ruse-known-as-al-qaeda/
4 - http://www.infowars.com/nato-using-al-qaeda-to-destabilize-syria/

Al-Qaeda is a former CIA asset. In fact they are still using them in Egypt and Syria to exert regime change. They don't want to *really* want hurt their friend/ally by stealing money..... just put on a little show to impress the Americans back home.

1 - http://www.infowars.com/syrian-girl-natos-secret-agenda-in-syria/
2 - http://www.infowars.com/al-qaeda-rebel-pictured-with-un-observers-in-syria/
3 - http://www.infowars.com/cia-double-agent-cia-and-british-intelligence-created-ruse-known-as-al-qaeda/
4 - http://www.infowars.com/nato-using-al-qaeda-to-destabilize-syria/

Al-Qaeda is a former CIA asset. In fact they are still using them in Egypt and Syria to exert regime change. They don't want to *really* want hurt their friend/ally by stealing money..... just put on a little show to impress the Americans back home.

1 - http://www.infowars.com/syrian-girl-natos-secret-agenda-in-syria/
2 - http://www.infowars.com/al-qaeda-rebel-pictured-with-un-observers-in-syria/
3 - http://www.infowars.com/cia-double-agent-cia-and-british-intelligence-created-ruse-known-as-al-qaeda/
4 - http://www.infowars.com/nato-using-al-qaeda-to-destabilize-syria/