Slashdot Mirror


$400 Free From Microsoft for Californians

Jon writes "California and Oregon residents can get out of the 3 yr commitment to MSN and keep the $400 rebate available at Best Buy, OfficeMax, Office Depot and Staples." If anyone can confirm that this actually works I'd like to hear it, but if nothing less, its pretty amusing.

246 comments

  1. Free money... by CokeBear · · Score: 0

    Microsoft should give everyone in the world $400...
    They'd still have lots left over.

    --
    Reality has a liberal bias
    1. Re:Free money... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're not one of those liberal hippies, who thinks the world owes you something are you?

    2. Re:Free money... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm, that would be about: 2,400,000,000,000

      2.4 Trillion dollars, something tells me that even Microsoft doesn't have that kind of money...yet.

      Now the real question is, did they know about this law when they came up with this idea, or did they get caught in the middle of it once they launched? If that were the case, they sure are lucky that more states don't have a law like Calif. and Oregon.

    3. Re:Free money... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're not one of those liberal hippies, who thinks the world owes you something are you?



      I guess your one of those extreme capitalists who would take a cane away from an old woman in a snowstorm and then proceede to beat her to death with it huh? If someone wants to give money away that's their right.

    4. Re:Free money... by SEWilco · · Score: 2
      guess you're one of those extreme capitalists who would take a cane away from an old woman
      Well, how much are you offering to pay us capitalists?
    5. Re:Free money... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everyone in the world doesn't deserve $400. I'm sure if they provide $400 worth of goods and/or services for Microsoft, they'd be happy to provide the "free money".

  2. A cunning plan by Dirtside · · Score: 3
    Maybe we can return the rebates to Microsoft in exchange for a promise to write better software.

    Or better yet, if every Californian does this, we'll have $14 billion, which we can use to make a competing company to write better software. Say, "Macrosoft".

    --- Dirtside | "Spirituality" is the irrational belief in the supernatural

    --
    "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    1. Re:A cunning plan by FaRuvius · · Score: 2

      Why not call it "MacroHard"? and we could develop and market an opensource OS called "Doors" that would come preloaded with InternetExploiter.

      --
      Need to get away?
      Adirondack Vacations
    2. Re:A cunning plan by Dirtside · · Score: 0
      No, no, Internet Exploder.

      A direct competitor to Nutscrape Nazigator.

      --- Dirtside | "Spirituality" is the irrational belief in the supernatural

      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    3. Re:A cunning plan by bmetzler · · Score: 3
      Why not call it "MacroHard"?

      No, No. We *must* call it MicroHURD

      -Brent
    4. Re:A cunning plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're assuming that Microsoft could make quality software if they chose to do so. What is the basis for this assumption ?

    5. Re:A cunning plan by Flenser · · Score: 1

      I imagine that MS is chock-full of really good programmers. No, really! Consider this: Windoze has been only added on to, never restarted from scratch, and it's painfully bloated and inefficient... yet it holds together, most of the time. Besides, when you employ that many people, statistics dictate you've got to end up with a reasonable percentage of competant personell. End result? MS, if run by someone intelligent who was truly interested in furthuring the PC industry, could crank out amazing pieces of software that would make billions without monopolistic practices.

      --
      -- "Of course the meek shall inherit the earth. They're welcome to it. As for the rest of us - Pavonis Mons, here we c
    6. Re:A cunning plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Besides, when you employ that many people, statistics dictate you've got to end up with a reasonable percentage of competant personell. End

      But aren't the chances of Microsoft having competent programmers just 50/50? I mean, either they do or they don't.

      By the way, for the moderators, this was HUMOR.

    7. Re:A cunning plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft Idiot Exploiter. Far more apt.

    8. Re:A cunning plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better yet, why don't you just write the "better" software. I suppose a panel of geeks will determine whether your software is "better" than Microsoft's. This would be far better than relying on the support of the actual users of the software.

  3. Don't do something stupid you might regret. by slashdot-terminal · · Score: 3

    I think Microsoft may just wait until some slightly higher profile person does this and then challenge it in court and make a public example of them. Remember you may not matter but that dosn't mean that they are not paying attention to you.

    --
    Slashdot social engineering at it's finest
    1. Re:Don't do something stupid you might regret. by es-mo · · Score: 3

      According to the article they have no legal basis for doing anything.... There are actually different contracts for CA and OR, which contain no language that compels people to repay upon cancellation. IANAL, but I don't see how they could build a case.

  4. Not just a computer rebate by kramer · · Score: 2

    Even better news is that according to the article is that you don't have to apply the rebate to a new computer like they imply in their ad, but simply have to have spent as much money as the rebate is worth (i.e. No cash back).

    Personally, if I were in California I'd be getting myself a nice new jumbo sized hard drive on Microsoft.

    1. Re:Not just a computer rebate by slashdot-terminal · · Score: 2

      Personally, if I were in California I'd be getting myself a nice new jumbo sized hard drive on Microsoft.


      $400 for even a top of the line hd is rather inflated is that what people in California and Oregon have to pay these days?

      --
      Slashdot social engineering at it's finest
    2. Re:Not just a computer rebate by MindStalker · · Score: 3

      Accually, for a good SCSI drive, that price is just about right. (Note: the price of SCSI is way inflated for what it should be, but I digress).

    3. Re:Not just a computer rebate by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      "$400 for even a top of the line hd is rather inflated"

      "Top of the line?"

      So, you're getting fiberchannel for less than
      a couple grand then?

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    4. Re:Not just a computer rebate by djneko · · Score: 1
      Actually, you just buy two ATA66 27gb maxtors for 200 each, plus a ATA66 card for 50 bucks, and you have 55 GB for 80 or so bucks. (My friend did something similar) Personally, I just got a nice 19" Sony Trinitron. Now I can't see my living room from where I sit in the corner. And thanks to MS (never thought I'd be saying that in any non-sarcastic manner) it was only $250. Occasionally, I love this country. This is one of those times.

      -dj

      --
      `/\/\
      (^.^)
      (")(")
      not quite an analog pussy, just a cat that plays with vinyl
  5. Re:And the reason for this article is? by slashdot-terminal · · Score: 2

    I'm just curious why this article was posted on Slashdot. There's no angle to BASH Microsoft here. What are the Linux zealots to do?



    It has nothing to do with Linux in any way just about people who don't want to use MSN as their ISP or have to stay with them for a period of 3 years. Why should I sign up for MSN when I could say have a DSL or cable or even a T-1 and use a closer, better, faster, more courteous ISP than MSN?

    --
    Slashdot social engineering at it's finest
  6. hahahahahahahahahahahah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    eat it, Bill !!!!

  7. except that you spend it anyway by DuckWing · · Score: 2

    It's funny. They way they word these "savings" ads. It sounds like you're saving $400 or whatever off your computer purchase for example, if you sign up for MSN or AOL (which I've also seen) or some such. But the time you sign up for one of these services costs the same amount of money you supposedly "save."

    I suppose you do save something in a sense, but when it comes down to it, it's just brainwashing you to sign up for a service you don't need.

    --
    -- DuckWing
    1. Re:except that you spend it anyway by RedX · · Score: 2

      You apparently completely ignored the article before posting. The "news" here is that in California and Oregon, you can cancel MSN service after a month and keep the $400 with no punishment for breaking a contract.

    2. Re:except that you spend it anyway by Jeff+Ballard · · Score: 1
      But the time you sign up for one of these services costs the same amount of money you supposedly "save."

      IIRC, the average bill for MSN for 3 years is something like $720. So you typically spend more than the $400 by the time you are done with it...

      Although, I do know for a fact that for one person this was the best of all deals. Here in Wisconsin, we tend to have some fairly funky local calling zones. Since one of my friends lives about 10 minutes out of town, the MSN number was the only ISP (yes, I checked), that was a local call from her house. (damn telcos) So she saved $400 on two things she wanted (the computer and MSN).

      --
      Good Fast Cheap. Pick any two.
    3. Re:except that you spend it anyway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, at $21.95/mo for 36 months, it comes out to $790.20 total. Not a very good interest rate. But, if you are OK with using MSN/CompuServe/AOL/etc. for three years and don't mind not having the option to switch providers for three years it might not be a bad deal.

    4. Re:except that you spend it anyway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Brainwashing" you? Anyone who can't figure the deal out doesn't have a brain to begin with. I hope that some rational subset of the population realizes that companies don't survive by surrendering their assests. But I'd probably be surprised.

  8. It probably applies to CompuServer and Juno too by georgeha · · Score: 1

    I think CompuServer and Juno are offering similar rebates,it looks lke a great way for Californian's to steal $400.

    George

    1. Re:It probably applies to CompuServer and Juno too by slashdot-terminal · · Score: 2

      I think CompuServer and Juno are offering similar rebates,it looks lke a great way for Californian's to steal $400.



      I thought that Juno was that free e-mail company is their an ISP that has a similar name or has Juno changed it TOS now?

      --
      Slashdot social engineering at it's finest
    2. Re:It probably applies to CompuServer and Juno too by bmetzler · · Score: 2
      I thought that Juno was that free e-mail company is their an ISP that has a similar name or has Juno changed it TOS now?

      They've expanded. You can still get free e-mail. But now you can get ... whoops, looks like they've changed their service plans again. You can get either free internet access, or Premium internet access. Oh, and they have WebMail.

      -Brent
  9. Whoa, free computer! by delevant · · Score: 1
    If I lived in California, I think I might be headed out to buy a free computer tonight.

    After all, $400 takes a big chunk of expense out of a low-end machine, and just about any of those crummy E-Machines units would still make a decent firewall/router etc.

    Moreover, the $400 isn't so much money that I wouldn't be willing to take the chance on getting burned.

    I mean, if they pull a 180 and enforce a cancellation penalty, I'm still not so badly off . . . and if they don't enforce, I get a free computer!

    Somebody give this a try & let us know how it works out.

    --
    I have no .sig, and I must scream.
  10. Breaking even... by illogic · · Score: 3

    Let's see...

    MS-DOS 6.0...$90
    Windows 3.1..$90
    Windows 95...$90
    Windows 98...$90
    90+90+90+90=$360

    I'll take the 40 bucks and we'll call it even.

  11. So...1 by Hard_Code · · Score: 2

    So, we can go to Best Buy, and pick up our favorite boxed Linux distribution, /and/ get Microsoft to not only pay for it but hand us @$360 to put in our pocket? heh, sweet...

    Jazilla.org - the Java Mozilla

    --

    It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
    1. Re:So...1 by Col.+Klink+(retired) · · Score: 2

      You have to spend all of the rebate, so no, you can't get $360 cash.

      --

      -- Don't Tase me, bro!

    2. Re:So...1 by 10Brett-T · · Score: 1

      Buy several boxes ($400 worth) of your favorite Linux distro and give them to unconverted friends.

      --
      10Brett-T
      Oh, bother.
    3. Re:So...1 by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 1

      Buy several boxes ($400 worth) of your favorite Linux distro and give them to unconverted friends.



      Good idea! Does CheapBytes have one of these stupid rebate deals?

  12. Re:And the reason for this article is? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...to post off topic slams at MS.. which is demonstrated by the 1st message..

  13. It's not worth the rebate. by capuchin · · Score: 2

    Regardless of whether or not Microsoft is paying for the rebate or not, there is profit being made by OfficeMax or Best Buy. These companies sell crappy prepackaged component machines (like Packard Bell) through unskilled, uninformed salespeople. These are the companies responsible for selling the public on the idea of proprietary software. These companies reduce profits for hardware manufacturers and encourage marketing hype over quality product. It's more important to be moral than get free money. Don't give your money to people like this. Please.

    1. Re:It's not worth the rebate. by MarkKomus · · Score: 1

      Well I agree its right to be moral than get free money, you're going to have a hard time to convince people to believe so when $400 is involved. Face it, espically to students, $400 is a lot of money, heck I'd love $400 right now (in Canadian dollars I could buy a car :)

      Its always been an interesting question though to see how much money it takes to make people change their minds on an issue, when they know its wrong. Maybe only $400 can do it.

    2. Re:It's not worth the rebate. by steeef · · Score: 1

      morals shmorals. $400 from microsoft is too good to ignore

    3. Re:It's not worth the rebate. by CausticPuppy · · Score: 1

      >>there is profit being made by OfficeMax or Best Buy.

      And as we all know, profit is Evil. You must be a member of the "boycott every company that makes a profit" crowd.

      However, according to that article, you can buy a nice new Sony TV and get $400 off of that as well.
      Tip #1: ignore the salespeople.
      Tip #2: buy a cheap machine, format the proprietary software right off the drive, and install your favorite Linux distro. By the way, not everything's a conspiracy, either.

      --
      -CausticPuppy "Of all the people I know, you're certainly one of them." -Somebody I don't know
    4. Re:It's not worth the rebate. by oxygen · · Score: 1

      Hey, now assuming ms would have stood by the liscense thing that said that if we were not willing to agree to terms...send it back, couldn't we get the system, send back the liscense, and gotten more money????? LBS

      --
      Why is it that its easier to write a huge comment here, but I still can't write the first paragraph of that english st
    5. Re:It's not worth the rebate. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i really must dissagree with you comments about Office Max and Best Buy computer offerings. At least at our local stores in Virginia, I have consistantly found quality components and computers that work fairly easily with linux and OS/2. If the store offers a good computer for less, I'll buy it there... regardless of whether they also sell M$ products or Packard Bell... Let the buyer beware, however, if they do not know what they want before they enter the store. Sales people are 'sales' people, and unless you are near a good university or large population base, you will most likely find 'sales' people, i.e. without technical knowledge. You cannot blame the sales people for taking a job that doesn't require much know-how. Most people who ask questions they cannot answer already know which parts work and which ones do not. Therefore, it is pointless to ask them questions regarding linux-compatibility. In fact, the last time I asked if a notebook was linux compatible, the sales person didn't know what linux was. This doesn't mean I didn't buy the computer. I bought it after looking at the manuals and determining that it would or should work. Oh well, just my ramblings...

    6. Re:It's not worth the rebate. by dumbunny · · Score: 1

      You're not making sense.

      If you're a fan of Microsoft, then sure, the rebate might not be worth it. But if you dislike Microsoft, Office Max, and Packard Bell equally, then you might as well take advantage of it. Say you spend $421.95 for MSN plus a $400 computer that costs $200 in parts and labor, and get a $400 rebate. You are getting a computer that costs (Microsoft + Office Max + Packard Bell) $200 for $21.95. The trio, as a group, is losing $178.05. How the money changes hands within this group is not your responsibility.

      Besides, super-rebates like this are the essence of marketing hype. As long as this tactic is profitable, big companies with deep pockets will have a huge advantages over smaller companies who may have more quality products. One way to discourage this practice is to take a bite out of the profits of the tactic by using loopholes like this. If you care about quality products, taking advantage of this promotion is a moral imperative. Do give your money to people like this, please.






    7. Re:It's not worth the rebate. by KarMann · · Score: 1

      Tip #2: buy a cheap machine, format the proprietary software right off the drive, and install your favorite Linux distro.

      And don't forget to collect your Windows rebate afterwards, too! :-)

      Good... bad... I'm the one with the gun.

      --
      ProofReading Markup Language - and yes, I find typos.
    8. Re:It's not worth the rebate. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Take your morality and shove it up your ass!!

    9. Re:It's not worth the rebate. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      when they know its [sic] wrong

      How exactly do you know what somebody else is thinking? How do you "know" if anybody (besides yourself) knows it's wrong?

      I don't think it's wrong.

    10. Re:It's not worth the rebate. by SEE · · Score: 1

      Give them money?

      As near as I can tell, if I spend $400 on merchandise from Best Buy, get the $400 rebate, and (if a California/Oregon resident) cancel MSN, I don't give them any money. I just transfer $400 from Microsoft to Best Buy, and some sales tax to my state govenment.

      Sure, Best Buy makes some money -- but they net less than Microsoft loses, while Amana and I both come out ahead.

    11. Re:It's not worth the rebate. by ErnieD · · Score: 1

      I take offense to this comment. I work at OfficeMax part time on breaks from college, and I don't appreciate your generalization of retail salespeople. I like to think of myself as highly knowlegeable, as do my supervisors and my customers. Sure, there are a few bad apples who don't know their stuff, but on the whole, people working in electronics departments are well-informed about the products they sell. If they're not, they end up with a pink slip unless their manager is as lazy as they are. Generalizations like the one you make are unfounded and uninformed.

      You mention "crappy prepackaged component machines" as if it were an unholy thing. For families and casual users just getting into computing, these systems offer minimal hassle and price, and the customer benefits in that they understand what it is they're getting, they don't have to choose components they don't comprehend. I have never been a fan of proprietary systems, but that's only because I'm an advanced user. The average Joe American who just needs to browse the web, email their cousins, and play the occasional game doesn't care about UDMA/66 and AGP4x and having the fastest system on their block. They want to take home a few boxes, plug in a few wires, and go.

      The deal with these $100 to $400 rebates is this:

      (1) You've just bought a new computer and want to get onto the internet. Why not sign up for one, two, or three years and get a few hundred bucks back?
      (2) You already have a computer and want to get onto the internet. So why not sign up at your local OfficeMax and get a free printer, scanner, or some software out of the deal?

      So to capuchin and all others who agree with his generalization: please don't insult the entire retail electronics workforce without knowing it.

      Dan Barr
      ErnieD

  14. Sheer amazement by technos · · Score: 2

    It honestly amazes me that one of our own AC has taken the effort to create a forum for his odd, yet strikingly funny posts. I hope you continue the 'serial' in the new forum, lest you be (-1 Offtopic)'ed to death here.

    Strangly enough, 'fat-time and lubie' isn't nearly the craziest thing I've seen grab a following of viewers.

    --
    .sig: Now legally binding!
    1. Re:Sheer amazement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sorta putting my ass on the line, aren't i?!

    2. Re:Sheer amazement by mackga · · Score: 2

      Actually, he's pretty good. I read his massive posting in another /. story, and some of the stuff IS pretty witty. He should team up with some graphic artist geek and crank out a web-strip - sort of a post-techno-cyberpunk-neo-nihilist slightly surreal vision thingy with just a touch of open source /. inside hurmor. Just might go over big :)

      --

      "shop smart:shop s-mart" ash

    3. Re:Sheer amazement by technos · · Score: 2

      That was the first thought I had too! Its kind of a 'Zippy the Pinhead' meets 'Slashdot Trolls' with a healthy dose of LSD.

      Of course, my second was 'Why on God's green earth would anyone want to use the open-source actress meme'.

      On a side note, it seems he has all of his /. postings 'archived'. They make slightly more sense in rapid-fire sequence.

      --
      .sig: Now legally binding!
  15. Repeatable? by Improv · · Score: 1

    Could you just get tons of stuff free by repeating
    the process and always buying ~$350 of computer
    equipment?

    --
    For every problem, there is at least one solution that is simple, neat, and wrong.
    1. Re:Repeatable? by Van+Halen · · Score: 1
      Could you just get tons of stuff free by repeating the process and always buying ~$350 of computer equipment?

      The fine print for the Best Buy offer says that it is valid only on new MSN account established in store at time of PC purchase. So it depends on how they define "new account." If it means you must never have had an MSN account before, then you can only do it once. If it just means that you must not have an existing account, perhaps this would work: use the rebate today, cancel the MSN, and within a month when it's all canceled, try it again. The offer ends Feb 29, so I imagine you could only get it in twice.

      That said, the GF and I are off to Best Buy tonight to see what free stuff we want to pick up. ;-)

  16. Hey! You there in CA!! by jabber · · Score: 3

    Would our California and Oregon bretheren be willing to buy the rest of us cheap computers and upgrades? There's a $100 a piece in it for ya, and we'll pay shipping.

    Hmmm, it's getting very interesting. First we had to buy our computers and ISP subscriptions. Now we can get free computers for ISP subscriptions and free Internet access with the purchase of a computer. Dare I speculate that free PCs and free access are next? Well, at the cost of personal information. Hmm.

    --

    -- What you do today will cost you a day of your life.
    1. Re:Hey! You there in CA!! by trog · · Score: 1

      My room-mate just bought a HP Celeron-based system last week from Costco, who was also offering the $400 Microsoft rebate. Total cost of the computer (after rebate) $150.

      Our address: Castro Valley, CA.

      Hmmm...if this pans out, he'll be canceling msn in a month.

  17. Why am I not surprised? by EricWright · · Score: 2
    But Microsoft's Pilla said the company isn't worried about people canceling service.

    ``Our experience to date is that it's been a very popular program,'' Pilla said. ``We haven't seen that . . . and we don't expect to see that, basically because we think that the value that we're offering customers, as we've seen from the many sign-ups, is tremendous.''

    This is most likely because anyone who has little enough knowledge of computer hardware to buy a prepackaged system at Best Buy, etc. is the same type of person who also lacks the experience to know a good ISP when they see one!

    Eric

    1. Re:Why am I not surprised? by bmetzler · · Score: 3
      This is most likely because anyone who has little enough knowledge of computer hardware to buy a prepackaged system at Best Buy, etc. is the same type of person who also lacks the experience to know a good ISP when they see one!

      That's the whole problem with these rebates. It's the people that don't know better that are being duped. They'll realize the mistake later when they find out in a year that cable or DSL is better, but they can't get out of the contract without forking over $400.

      Yes, maybe Microsoft is getting a ton of sign-ups now by people that don't know better, but what about later when people realize they can drop MSN for better Internet Service? That's when we'll start seeing people bow out. Of course, with MS' investments in Cable and Telco, maybe they'll have it in place so that people won't need to leave MSN for the faster access. Then they don't need to worry.

      -Brent
  18. Probably NOT repeatable by delevant · · Score: 1
    I haven't seen the contracts in question, but based on reading similar contracts, I'd guess that there is a "once per household" restriction.

    I mean, it would make more sense that way.

    --
    I have no .sig, and I must scream.
  19. Re:And the reason for this article is? by Battra · · Score: 1

    On the contrary, for those so inclined, this presents on opportunity to bash Microsoft financially.

    Just gather up your family, friends and neighbors, and all go shopping at one of the participating stores. Pick out $400 worth of merchandise and get the instant rebate. Make sure to cancel right away.

    Is there any limitation on how often one can participate? If not: lather, rinse, repeat.

    You might be able to get $400 worth of stuff courtesy of Microsoft every day if you wanted to.

    For all those who were not able to get a rebate for an unused copy of Windows, here's an opportunity to get an in kind refund.

  20. Mail order form another state? by Snoobs · · Score: 1

    I'm from Colorado. legally speaking, does anyone know whether you can pull this off in other states? The article indicated that it was only for cali and oregon.

    Would there be a way to mail order a computer from another state?

    Post replies if you have any ideas to take advantage of such deals!

    1. Re:Mail order form another state? by Steelehead · · Score: 1

      RESIDENT.
      From the agreement:
      "...provided that if you are a resident of California or Oregon you will not be required to repay the credit amount..."

      --
      -- 100% MS-Free as of 4-4-1999, 11:47:38 PST. "The lapdance is always better when the stripper is cryin'" Free Kevin,
    2. Re:Mail order form another state? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The resident requirement always confuses me. See, I'm a "resident" in, at last count, three states. I currently live in New Jersey yet would do my purchasing in New York City. I'm a proud resident of California which is from where my driver's license is issued. I'm registered to vote in Maryland.

      So, do I qualify for the exclusion or not? I suspect "or not" because, well, these things never work out for me. Besides, I've lived long enough in New Jersey (one year) to legally be required to have a New Jersey driver's license. Since I don't have a car and never drive these days and I'd have to drive to the Motor Vehicles department and when I went with a friend a year ago it was the slowest I've seen (compared to Massachusetts, California, Maryland, and New York); I'm not going to get a New Jersey license.

      All that asside, I get summoned for jury duty in California, does that mean I'm a resident?

    3. Re:Mail order form another state? by Tip · · Score: 1

      The article said they used different sign up cards in those states, ie. no fine print on the card. So, I if I drove to California and signed up for the service would I be bound since I didn't sign a contract with fine print?

    4. Re:Mail order form another state? by oiuyt · · Score: 1
      I'm not a lawyer and all those other disclaimers.

      My understanding (from having recently looked into what it takes to switch to Florida residency) is that in general you can choose what state you're a resident of, but you might need to defend that choice. Indications that you really are a resident include things such as owning a home, being a registered voter, having a driver's license, etc.

      The general thing is that you're a resident of the state you intend to return to when you're not there.

      Oh, and the primary indication would be where you file your taxes.

      -Brad

    5. Re:Mail order form another state? by whoosp · · Score: 1

      Oh, and the primary indication would be where you file your taxes.

      ...Except that when I moved from illinois to washington a couple of years ago, I ended up paying taxes in both states. You pay state taxes for whatever state you earn money in.

    6. Re:Mail order form another state? by whoosp · · Score: 1

      Hrm, nevermind. Now that I think back to it, I think I got a rebate on the tax I'd had withheld in illinois. My bad.

    7. Re:Mail order form another state? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeeessss....

      Except that there is no Washington State Income Tax...
      Tryin' to pull a slickee on the Slashdot??

    8. Re:Mail order form another state? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IANAL too. My understanding: you only get one legal residence during a given year, and it is suppose to be where you spend the majority of your time. Since this is not so easily tracked, the courts use that other info as supporting (or refuting evidence). Basically, you get to decided where you reside, as long as you do spend time there. You've got to be consistent though. The courts will throw the book at you if they find that your claiming residency in two states at the same time.

    9. Re:Mail order form another state? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really?

    10. Re:Mail order form another state? by whoosp · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and there's no sales tax in oregon, so if you live in washington on the border and shop in oregon, whoo-ee!. Except then you have to live on the border between oregon and washington.

  21. Re:OPEN SOURCE CALIFORNIANS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    YAY! I have a new hero! Write more my friend, and don't forget to tell all of us.

  22. Wow! by taniwha · · Score: 3

    you mean I could buy a large piece of MicroSoft software ... and actually end up paying what it's really worth?

    1. Re:Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, not if you consider the true value of the software :)
      This reminds me abaut the almost "free" mobile phones you could get here in Scandiavia
      Many people found them to be quite expensive.
      consider your needs.
      There is no thing as a free meal.

  23. Does this actually work?? by Mr.Whit3 · · Score: 1

    In the article it says they discussed this with people at the mentioned stores but does it really work? I live in California and I really really don't want to get stuck with MSN for any amount of time (much less 4 years. LMK thanx

  24. Yes it is true... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Here's the link the best buy's website that contains the actual "fine print" on this little matter... http://www.bestbuy.com/weeklyad/fineprint/index.as p Now an excerpt from the page... The credit card will be automatically billed $21.95 each month. You are not obligated to continue as an MSN Internet Access member for any particular length of time; however, if for any reason whatsoever you do not continue for the period of time associated with the purchase credit that you have elected to receive, you agree that MSN will charge your credit card for the entire amount of the purchase credit immediately upon termination or cancellation of your MSN Internet Access account; provided that if you are a resident of California or Oregon you will not be required to repay the credit amount. ... so, it does work. mmmmmm new camera

    1. Re:Yes it is true... by miserere · · Score: 2
      ...The credit card will be automatically billed $21.95 each month...

      My experience with MSN from a few years ago was that once they start billing you it's very hard to get them to stop. It took me 3 months and the intervention of my credit card company.

    2. Re:Yes it is true... by Steelehead · · Score: 2

      I concur.
      I used to work for a credit card company and MSN was very difficult to stop, they kept submitting rebuttles, asking for proof of cancellation, anything to prolong and hope the customer would give up (or so it seemed).

      --
      -- 100% MS-Free as of 4-4-1999, 11:47:38 PST. "The lapdance is always better when the stripper is cryin'" Free Kevin,
  25. Not surprisingly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    We have a bunch of Microsoft bashing, and no answers to the question posed.

    (yawn)

  26. copy of rebate form here. by scrunch · · Score: 4

    A copy of the rebate form can be found here:
    http://www.staples.com/products/themes/microsoft/m snoffer/contract_co_reb.asp
    I noticed the words "advance" and "lend" are used. Sounds like MS wants their $$ back if you cancel early. Notice how they don't use the word "rebate" so when you ask them if early cancelation affects the rebate they can answer "No" because its a loan not a rebate. (Did that make any sense?) Microsoft offered this deal last year with Viewsonic monitors. A post on www.deal-finder.com indicated that MS wouldn't allow you to take advantage of the rebate if you canceled. I don't think MS is dumb enough to give away $400. But who knows?

    1. Re:copy of rebate form here. by Col.+Klink+(retired) · · Score: 3

      You didn't even read your own link:

      "You are not obligated to continue as a
      MSN Internet Access member for any particular length of time."

      The CA & OR law only applies to "loans", not rebates. The article gives the example of protecting consumers from buying insurance from car dealers who finance new cars or buying property insurance from a mortgage broker.

      --

      -- Don't Tase me, bro!

    2. Re:copy of rebate form here. by thaley · · Score: 2

      "You agree that this agreement will be governed by the laws of the state of Washington and you consent to the exclusive jurisdiction and venue of courts in King County, Washington in all disputes arising out of or relating to this agreement. " It looks like they're trying to avoid the CA law, but does anyone know if this would hold up in court?

  27. No thanks by blj8 · · Score: 0
    To put it bluntly, I wouldn't take Windows even if M$ PAID me to, so all this is irrelevant to me anyway.

    All in all, I'll stick with Linux. :)

    1. Re:No thanks by Col.+Klink+(retired) · · Score: 2

      Then do like the article suggests and buy a refrigerator with the money. They'll let you spend it on anything in their stores!

      --

      -- Don't Tase me, bro!

  28. Re:And the reason for this article is? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You don't have to use MSN as your ISP at all. Just don't make the agreement in exchange for their money. I find it amazing hypocritical of people to complain about the rebate-for-ISP-lock in deals. No one is forcing you to do this. If you don't want to be locked into using an ISP for three years (and who would?), then simply don't take them up on their offer.

  29. Ethics vs. Mob Mentality by HipNerd · · Score: 2

    I have to admit that I am leaning towards running out and buying $401 worth of something at Best Buy and sticking it to the man.

    But in more honest moments, I suspect that I am using my pent up hostility toward Microsoft to cover up the fact that I would be stealing.

    "But wait!" you cry. "This is Microsoft's fault. They are the ones that left the loophole in their contract."

    That's like blaming the kid who's bike you stole because he didn't lock it up. It certainly doesn't make your actions any more noble.

    Microsoft is easy to hate sometimes. But I'm trying not to become just like them -- willing to make a buck anyway possible at the expense of others.

    We know how these programs are supposed to work. Even if the ISP service costs about the same, you get a deferred, interest-free loan on a low-cost PC. It has allowed many people (my sister included) to get a PC when otherwise they may not have been able to. This in a Good ThingTM. I would hate to see these programs cancelled due to abuse.

    HipNerd



    --
    Hipnerd
    1. Re:Ethics vs. Mob Mentality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree! Signing a contract is making a promise to do something. (In this case, pay for 3 years of service.) To sign a contract with the intent of immediately breaking is is wrong, loophole or no.

    2. Re:Ethics vs. Mob Mentality by Col.+Klink+(retired) · · Score: 2

      But the contract doesn't include the promise to buy the service for 3 years. MS was aware of the CA & OR laws and changed the contract in those states. It explicitly says "you can have this money and you have no obligation".

      I can see that it would be different if the contract said you had to pay it back, but the law trumped the contract and you weren't required to keep a promise you made. But that's not the case here... in CA & OR, they removed your promise to keep the service.

      --

      -- Don't Tase me, bro!

    3. Re:Ethics vs. Mob Mentality by nharmon · · Score: 1

      Absolutely not. This is not like stealing. It's like finding a '71 Hemicuda, in mint shape for $1,200,... buying it, and then having the seller get angry because he didn't pay enough attention. You go with the good deals, and you stray from the bad. You know?

    4. Re:Ethics vs. Mob Mentality by HipNerd · · Score: 1

      I agree with your analysis of the law. But as Microsoft has proved in the past, law and personal ethics are two entirely seperate things.

      It may be legal to do this to Microsoft, and even enjoyable to watch them squirm. But in your heart, can you honestly say that it is right? It is a program they developed to promote their business.

      It is a good deal on it's own merits, particularly for computer neophytes. Using this loophole is basically taking $400 from Microsoft. What do they get from the deal? Nothing. Leave the law and your views of Microsoft out of it.

      Is it right to take money like this then fail to honor your part of the bargain?

      Hipnerd

      --
      Hipnerd
    5. Re:Ethics vs. Mob Mentality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed! Pcs are so damn cheap now anyway that #400.00 doesnt seem like a great deal of cash. Computers are like Kleenex. Buy them, use them, throw them away. Buy a new box.

    6. Re:Ethics vs. Mob Mentality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "But in more honest moments, I suspect that I am using my pent up hostility toward Microsoft to cover up the fact that I would be stealing."

      Ask the windows refund people how they feel about this. I think they would feel vindicated:)

      Have you read the EULA lately? I would call this justice!

      Joe

    7. Re:Ethics vs. Mob Mentality by aozilla · · Score: 1

      No, Microsoft is betting that most people will not back out, but they know some will. Every time you go to MSN's web page it costs Microsoft money, but they are betting that enough people will click on ads to make it worth it. Is it wrong for you to go to MSN's web page and not click on the ad? Is it stealing to watch TV and to change the channel when the commercials come on? Is it wrong to use a credit card which gives cash back and pay it off every month?

      --
      ok then your [sic] infringing on my copyright! Could you as [sic] me next time before STEALING my comments for your own?
    8. Re:Ethics vs. Mob Mentality by Flenser · · Score: 1

      Well, pardon me - were you snacking on caviar as you wrote this in your new Megacar (http://www.megacar.com)? To the vast majority of people living in the world at large, $400US is a rather hefty chunk of cash. Most of us can't "buy them, use them, throw them away. Buy a new box." Yes, they are rather inexpensive. But what if you can't afford to spend 500 or 700 bucks every few months? What if you want a better system to do more on? I don't know where you're coming from, but $400 dollar PCs are usually awfully built, nasty to try to upgrade, and generally not really worth the money. From personal experience, the sweet spot for getting your money's worth is in the $700-$1500 range. And then there's my original point: $400 is NOT a small amount of money. It's a significant sum to pretty much anyone, even upper-class snobs in the States. Try to think before you base all of your assumptions on nobody buying anything other than PCs.

      (All prices in US dollars, of course.)

      --
      -- "Of course the meek shall inherit the earth. They're welcome to it. As for the rest of us - Pavonis Mons, here we c
    9. Re:Ethics vs. Mob Mentality by danb35 · · Score: 1
      Is it right to take money like this then fail to honor your part of the bargain?

      If you're a resident of CA or OR, the bargain goes like this: You sign up for MSN for 3 years, MS gives you $400. You aren't obligated to keep (or pay for) MSN for any length of time, nor or you obligated to return the money.

      Remember, these are the terms of the bargain (according to Best Buy's fine print). You're not signing an agreement and then later using some external loophole to weasel out of it; you are fulfilling all of your obligations under the contract. If Microsoft wants to propose a contract where they give you $400 and your only obligation is to sign up for their service, that's their problem.

    10. Re:Ethics vs. Mob Mentality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly! Well put. I wish (at least the basics of) contract law (were) was taught in public schools.

  30. Mail rebate. by jued0001 · · Score: 1
    Good luck trying to get your rebate back in the mail. It's been two years since I sent a rebate form in for some memory I purchased, and over a year for a video card I purchased. I would definitely hit OfficeCrap and get the instant rebate at the checkout!!!

    Too bad I live in WI...

    --

    _______

    I just wish I could c:\format Internet

  31. The catch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I heard about this back in November and dug through the details... the catch is that they refund you about $11/month as long as you keep the MSN account. It is not a lump sum.

    1. Re:The catch by jeffsplace · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure how this is *news* since at the local MicroCenter here in Columbus, Ohio, many of my techie friends got $400 in free computer stuff (anything in the store) by signing up for one of MSN's deals. In the original contract that these people signed (they made sure they could do it before trying it), it said that you could "cancel the service at any time." So, they got their $400 certificate for MicroCenter, bought their stuff, got home, called the people at MSN and canceled their account. All in the same day. How's that for free money?

      [BTW, I should think this loophole has been since closed.]

  32. A loophole one should not take by Zagato-sama · · Score: 1

    It's dissapointing to see people looking for an easy chunk of change to make via this loophole. Typical slashdot "Let's rip off Microsoft" response aside I think this is a pretty good deal for the average consumer. It is because of deals like this (I think Compuserve also has something similar?) that lower income families are able to afford a first time low class computer. Please don't "screw" MSN over this, it'll just end up hurting a lot of future possible computer users if MSN closes this deal offering.

    1. Re:A loophole one should not take by Samrobb · · Score: 1
      Please don't "screw" MSN over this, it'll just end up hurting a lot of future possible computer users if MSN closes this deal offering.

      Doubtful... the worst that could happen is that MS modifies recinds the offer in CA and OR. In the first case, they can get the computers under slightly different terms - as a rebate, maybe, instead of a loan. In the second case, they can drive over state lines or go through mail order to buy a computer (which many folks in SoCal do now, anyways, to buy cars, since CA taxes on auto sales are so ruinous.)

      --
      "Great men are not always wise: neither do the aged understand judgement." Job 32:9
    2. Re:A loophole one should not take by Disco+Stu · · Score: 2

      It is because of deals like this (I think Compuserve also has something similar?) that lower income families are able to afford a first time low class computer.

      Nice sentiment, but it doesn't quite work. $21.95/month for 3 years is a lot of money for a low income family. In fact, that totals up to almost $800 at the end of the 3 years.

    3. Re:A loophole one should not take by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly! if anything they are hurting low income families by exploiting their inability to make sound financial decisions and rewarding customers that are probably accumulating large amounts of credit card debt as it is. For all we know, a couple years from now the only people who will be paying $20 a month for modem internet access will be those who were locked in to plans like these. I don't think it's a safe assumption to make that ISP access charges will stay constant for that long. There are some ISP's that are already free!!

  33. California resident or california sales? by shang · · Score: 1

    So could I just drive down to California, buy myself a computer, and get the $400? Can I get away with this cause they have to abide by the California law? Or does this only apply to California residents? Either case, it'll be nice to get my relatives to get me a new computer for $399+tax (yes, tax is included in the $400 deal). I can always strip it for parts. Hmm, and it's on a per-individual basis, not per family. Let's see, 3 relatives 18+ in california=3 new computers free!!

  34. The fine print from Best Buy by crt · · Score: 4

    Here is the fine print from the Best Buy ad -- as you can clearly see it states that CA and OR residents aren't responsible for paying back anything if they cancel!

    INSTANTLY SAVE UP TO $400 ON ANY COMPUTER (excludes prior purchases) WHEN YOU SIGN UP IN STORE FOR UP TO 3 YEARS OF MSN INTERNET ACCESS AT JUST $21.95 A MONTH. Details of the MSN Instant Credit Program for Best Buy. The MSN Instant Credit program requires: (1) the purchase of a personal computer, notebook, or built-to-order PC, (excludes prior purchases), totaling in excess of the selected credit amount (sales tax will apply to the total purchase price including mail-in rebates and add-ons, as applicable) from Best Buy between January 2, 1999, and February 29, 2000; (2) selection of a 36-month membership to MSN Internet Access ($400 credit), 24-month membership ($225 credit), or 12-month membership ($100 credit) at the rate of $21.95 per month plus applicable taxes; (3) in-store signup at the time of purchase; (4) a valid major credit card (Visa, MasterCard, Discover/Novus, American Express accepted; Best Buy credit card or debit cards cannot be used with this offer); and (5) acceptance of the MSN Internet Access member agreement. The credit card will be automatically billed $21.95 each month. You are not obligated to continue as an MSN Internet Access member for any particular length of time; however, if for any reason whatsoever you do not continue for the period of time associated with the purchase credit that you have elected to receive, you agree that MSN will charge your credit card for the entire amount of the purchase credit immediately upon termination or cancellation of your MSN Internet Access account; provided that if you are a resident of California or Oregon you will not be required to repay the credit amount. Your social security number is required for processing your credit. You must be 18 years old or older to qualify for the MSN Instant Credit Program. Offer valid only on new MSN account established in store at time of PC purchase. MSN Internet Access is available only to users of the Windows® 95 or 98 operating systems. MSN Internet Access is available only for personal non-commercial use. Local phone and/or long distance toll charges may apply. It is the customer's responsibility to check with a local phone company to determine if access numbers are local. Local market network activity and capacity may affect access availability. MSN is a trademark of Microsoft Corporation. In the event that we are unable to register you for Internet service on the date of purchase, we will offer a mail-in rebate for the same amount. Additional conditions and restrictions apply. See product offer and store for additional details.


    1. Re:The fine print from Best Buy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Note the phrase, "Your social security number is required for processing your credit." Now I wonder if MSN will attempt to place a negative entry in your credit report is you prematurely terminate your MSN account with paying up.

    2. Re:The fine print from Best Buy by Zach+Baker · · Score: 2
      They would have no basis to place a negative entry in your credit report, since you have done nothing contrary to the agreement. I mean, they still might, but it would be baseless.

      They're simply giving you the credit in return for signing up with them. The agreement contains nothing that prohibits you from canceling your account, and in fact it explicitly says you are under no obligation to continue as a member once you sign up. It just says that if you cancel before the specified term, you must repay the credit amount (unless you live in CA and OR). It appears to be essentially a loan with no repayment required... in fact, a loan with no repayment mechanism specified at all.

  35. Microsoft Tax Refund by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Finally, it's here, a Microsoft Tax REFUND!!! I'll go buy a computer and be refunded for the Microsoft OS's I've been forced to buy before.

    1. Re:Microsoft Tax Refund by punkass · · Score: 1

      You should be able to do this regardless. IANAL, but I've heard from several different sources that, as long as you whip the drive of your new PC on the very first boot (ie, never booting the PC with Windows), you are entitled to a refund through Microsoft (or is it the PC vendor...one or the other) because you rejected the terms of the EULA.

      --
      "Nobody owns the fucking words man." - James Dean
    2. Re:Microsoft Tax Refund by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Problem is, microsoft has refused to honor its own EULA.

  36. We found the secret weapon.... by Bill+the+Cat · · Score: 1

    ...to deplete MS's cash hoard and deprive them of one of their biggest strengths.

    All we need is 50 million people (roughly) to take advantage of this, and MS's $20 billion should be whittled down in no time!

    1. Re:We found the secret weapon.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Umm.. hey, nice research.

      $20B is bordering on chump change, less than 3% of their market cap. M$ (as of 01/01/00) has a market cap of $604B. Yes, over a half-a-TRILLION dollars.

      As a previous poster said, they could give it to every customer and still have cash to burn.

  37. [OT] Your Lottery sig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    State lottery: (n) A tax on people who are bad at math.

    Um, your odds of winning are 50/50. Either you win or you lose. Yes?

    1. Re:[OT] Your Lottery sig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, your odds of winning are 50/50. Either you win or you lose. Yes?

      with /dev/urandom, yes... but on state lottery tickets there is often 5% educational donations, commissions, and administrative fees. Read the fine print on those lottery tickets next time. Add up those details. Casinos are an entirely different shell game...

    2. Re:[OT] Your Lottery sig by Dirtside · · Score: 1
      (Dirtside stares in blank horror for a moment) I'm going to assume you had a brain fart, because the only other option is that you're an idiot.

      What the sig means is that, on average, you will always lose money playing the lottery. Yes, some people will win, but if you total the amount of money spent on lottery tickets, N, and the total amount of money paid out by the state to the winners, X, you will find that N > X. Simple arithmetic then tells you that the average person loses money on the lottery, no matter what. Assume the population of lottery players is P; then the average person has spent N/P on the lottery, and has won X/P. N/P > X/P. Therefore you spend more than you win. Yes, SOME people will hit it big, but on average it's a losing gamble.

      Just because there are only two options (win and lose) does not mean that the probabilities are equal. If this isn't blindingly obvious, then, well, sorry, but you shouldn't be posting on Slashdot.

      --- Dirtside | "Spirituality" is the irrational belief in the supernatural

      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    3. Re:[OT] Your Lottery sig by Disco+Stu · · Score: 1

      Umm...no offense (I do love your sig), but I think the AC above was joking...at least I hope so. It was actually pretty funny. You know...like the mindset of the people who actually play it.

      I'll never forget the math professor (one of my personal heroes...D'Angelo if you happen to go to my school...and you know who you are...) said, "I don't understand what so many people here have against the lottery. I love the lottery -- it's a tax on stupid people! What could be better?"

    4. Re:[OT] Your Lottery sig by Alexander · · Score: 1

      Of course, if you come from the Frank Zappa school of probability then the odds of anything happening are 50/50, either it happens or it doesn't.

      So if I buy a lottery ticket, either I win or I don't, 50/50.

      The chance that I walk out of my office and get eaten by a hippopatumus is 50/50. Either it happens or it doesn't.

      --
      "oohhh... I didn't know Schopenhauer was a philosopher!" ..."uhhh yeah, he's the one that begins with
    5. Re:[OT] Your Lottery sig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After I finished laughing my ass off at this I proceeded to be amazed at the people in all seriousness trying to correct you.

      Jesus guys, take a silly pill or something, this is one of the funniest jokes I've heard in months and I plan to get good milage out of it myself.

      I've certainly seem stuff here moderated up to five and labeled funny that wasn't half as funny, witty, or clever.

  38. Affect on "Cheap computer" plans from others by Osty · · Score: 1

    So how does this affect other provdiers, such as CompuServe's $399 rebate at Circuit City and other stores? I haven't done my homework on these rebates/loans, but from the advertisements, Compuserve's seems to be an actual rebate and not a loan.

    Personally, "saving" $400 isn't worth any amount of time with a bad service provider, but then again, I'm not your average Circuit City/Best Buy/CompUSA computer customer, either.

  39. You are a resident of the state you claim. by nharmon · · Score: 1

    Basically, it really doesn't matter. Keep in mind, according to the Federal Government, you are a resident of the state you claim you're a resident in. Basically, if you claim to be a resident of California, you're a resident of california.

    But there's an ugly side to this. That being, you can only be a resident of one state at a time. And your residency effects things like automobile titles, as well as income tax returns. I think this stems from a case where an individual who lived and worked in two seperate states was found able to choose which state he owed income tax to.

  40. Non sequitur? by spectecjr · · Score: 0

    [A] CokeBear wrote:
    Microsoft should give everyone in the world $400...
    They'd still have lots left over.


    [B] In response, an AC wrote:
    You're not one of those liberal hippies, who thinks the world owes you something are you?

    [C] ... and then you wrote:
    I guess your one of those extreme capitalists who would take a cane away from an old woman in a snowstorm and then proceede to beat her to death with it huh? If someone wants to give money away that's their right.

    Hmmm... I can understand the chain of logic that gets from [A] to [B], but I don't understand how you get from [B] to [C]. Care to enlighten me?

    How does someone saying that Microsoft should give away all their money, and someone saying Why should they? mean that the person saying "Why should they?" is a capitalist pig?

    Oops... perhaps I just answered my own question.

    Simon

    --
    Coming soon - pyrogyra
    1. Re:Non sequitur? by AugstWest · · Score: 2

      Ah, see, it's called "hyberbole" -- using exageration for effect.

      It's usually used, as is the case here, for humorous effect.

  41. Another site with info about this by islador · · Score: 1
    1. Re:Another site with info about this by SpamapS · · Score: 1

      HELLO?! Did you read the original article? You just posted a link to the same damn article linked to by SlashDot. Geez... RTFA(Read The Fucking Article).

      --
      SpamapS -- Undernet #Linuxhelp
    2. Re:Another site with info about this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      HELLO?! Did you read the original article? You just posted a link to the same damn article linked to by SlashDot. Geez... RTFA(Read The Fucking Article).

      Heh heh heh! And he got moderated up "Informative" for it too!!!! If that doesn't say something about the moderators, I don't know what does. I knew it was a redundant link as soon as I saw it, because it was black. Meaning already visited. Because I had already read the article.

  42. Theft? No, it's their deal. by kramer · · Score: 2

    If Microsoft had wanted to they would have simply said "offer not valid in California or Oregon", but they didn't want to lose the VERY large and VERY lucrative market that is California. Microsoft is betting that most people won't bother to take advantage of the laws of the state they live in. If they're willing to take that bet, they need to be willing to accept that they're going to take the occasional loss.

  43. It is legit for now. by Masloki · · Score: 2

    Due to the wording, Microsoft is lending the money to the customers. Lending laws in CA and OR prohibit forcing people to purchase anything in conjunction with a loan. Therefore, sign-up for MSN service, get your loan, cancel MSN service, keep the loan money. Try not to mess up that order though.

    Personally, i would not chance anything with M$ though, especially when it comes to their money. I would rather have police raiding me for my micro-recorders than microsoft knocking on my door or sitting in my mailbox.

    --
    Sig-"Out beyond fields of wrongdoing and rightdoing, there is a field. I will meet you there." Jelaluddin Rumi
    1. Re:It is legit for now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe it's just some fancy accounting work at microsoft? Nobody else does this. Instead of taking a loss for $400 rebate, they claim it's a loan (so it doesn't impact thier imcome statements)?

    2. Re:It is legit for now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In fact, it's a loan which nobody has to repay ever (once secured). The buyer is only obligated to receive Internet service from MS for a scpefied period of time and pay for that. Technically, they're not paying the loan back. This is accounting magic!

  44. No. Take the loophole! by delevant · · Score: 1
    MS knew *exactly* what they were getting into when they offered these deals in Oregon and California -- they simply made the educated bet that enough people wouldn't cancel out.

    Now then, if lots of people cancel out, then they lost their bet. Fair and square. If almost nobody cancels out, then they win their bet. Also fair and square.

    You can't tell me that MS didn't research this. They research EVERYTHING!

    It was a gamble, MS knew it, so if we can take advantage of it -- good! Nobody is breaking any laws, nobody is getting screwed by accident. They took their chances, and now we get to take our turn at the table . . .

    Besides which, this is only in two states. MS (and CompuServe, and AOL, etc. etc.) is busy screwing everyone else in every other state with these deals, so it's only fair that at least some consumers get a chance at the bonus.

    --
    I have no .sig, and I must scream.
    1. Re:No. Take the loophole! by baby+fishface · · Score: 1

      Actually, they win either way. ISPs (America Online is a perfect example) count people as subscribers for long after they cancel the service.

      Microsoft will use these inflated numbers to impress Wall Street with the "growth" of MSN. They've figured that $400 is a decent price to pay for a subscriber. Some will bring in more revenue by staying longer, and some may cancel early, but in the end Microsoft will come out on top.

      Don't underestimate Microsoft.

  45. PLEASE MODERATE UP THE PARENT TO THIS POST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I heard about this back in November and dug through the details... the catch is that they refund you about $11/month as long as you keep the
    MSN account. It is not a lump sum.


    Can anyone confirm this? Can the original poster provide more detail, maybe a copy of any communications from MSN?

    1. Re:PLEASE MODERATE UP THE PARENT TO THIS POST by sqweaky · · Score: 1

      The "rebate" is not a "rebate" or a "refund". It is an instant credit and the documentation from best buy as well as my experience warrents it as such. When you check out, they take 400 off the purchase price. Period. This is considered a loan under california law, and MS can therefore not require you to repay it. I will be experimenting with this tonight to see exactly what happens. I will let you know of my purchases and results.

      --
      "They have computers and other weapons of mass destruction" -US Attorney General Janet Reno
  46. DEAL DOESN'T WORK!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Okay guys and girls, First off, the deal is OLD!!! This was first discovered 2-3 months ago when Viewsonic and Microsoft had the same exact rebate (including the Cali/Oregon expections). I personally called Viewsonic/Microsoft rebate center and they said it's fine that we cancel and we don't have to pay them back! So I was ready to get free money! But my friend calls and is told the same thing. Then he asks "How will I be paid"... THE SURPRISE? "We pay installments of $20 each month."

    1. Re:DEAL DOESN'T WORK!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So? Who cares ... you still get paid. I.e., a loan you don't have to pay back.

  47. Doesn't Apply to CompuServe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please read the the original linked article. It says that the Compuserve deal was not structured as a loan, so the OR/CA exception for bundling loans with purchases doesn't apply.

    Funny in a way as MS is finally taking a financial hit because they are not allowed to bundle their Internet service with new PCs.

  48. Shouldn't there be a way to delete this shit? by jhunsake · · Score: 0

    c'mon /.

    1. Re:Shouldn't there be a way to delete this shit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was on-topic, because it was in response to some else's posting to the article. Some one care to meta-moderate this?

  49. Don't You Have to Buy the Stuff FIRST? by owillis · · Score: 1

    I just printed out the form from Staples and my understanding is that you have to purchase something first and then apply for the rebate. I'm in CA, so I'm thinking about trying this...

    --
    OliverWillis.Com
    An Operative with an Agenda
  50. Use a webcertificate by Otto · · Score: 2

    Use a webcertificate. www.webcertificate.com

    It's essentially a Mastercard number, with a limit set at the actual amount you have in the certificate.

    Example: I deposit $100 into a webcertifcate. Now I can use that number online (or somewhere where I just need to write a number down) for up to $100 worth of charges. If someone queries on it, anything less than $100 will be okay (until that amount goes down by actually being charged).

    They come in very handy for paying something online where you don't want to be ripped off. Deposit a given amount that will cover what you wish to buy. They CAN'T charge you any more than that.. Pretty nifty.

    ---

    --
    - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
  51. Free Computer by TheMayor · · Score: 1
    I tried posting this story last week on how there is a loophole to the free computer, but I got rejected.

    Anycase...

    Connecticut has a Rebate Advertising law requiring retailers who advertise the net price of an item after deduction of a manufacturer's rebate to pay consumers the amount of that rebate when they buy the item. If the retailers don't wish to do this, they cannot advertise the after-rebate price as the final price to be paid by the consumer. Thus, there should be no confusion about the amount the customer must pay at the cash register.

    In other words, if a retailer says a computer is $0 after rebate, they must give it to you for $0, no strings attached. No lifetime of MSN or Compuserve.

    Outpost.com was advertising computers for $0 after rebate and because they are a retailer in Connecticut, they were forced to give computers out at $0.

    Check with your state's Consumer Protection Department to see if they have any laws like the one in CT.

  52. Warning: You may still have to pay it back! by Anonymous+Freak · · Score: 2

    Yes, MS gets around the "no purchase required" by making it a loan. However, because they call it a loan, you may still have to pay it back! It's not that they are giving you free money, just that they are loaning it to you, and your loan is payed back as internet access fees.

    True, IANAL, but that's my interpretation of the Staples contract at this link.

    --
    Another non-functioning site was "uncertainty.microsoft.com."
    The purpose of that site was not known.
  53. you only really get 350 by Serfer · · Score: 2

    Yes, they do give you 400 dollars store credit but the thing is when you go home and cancel, they charge you a 50 dopllar cancellation fee. So you only really effectively make 350.
    The process is, go sign up, buy stuff, go home, cancel, keep stuff, pay 50 dollar cancel fee.
    Yes it does work, i have done it before, and several of my friends have also done it

    1. Re:you only really get 350 by totient · · Score: 1

      This is false. It's all or nothing.

      If you call MSN customer service to cancel an account that was set up with a contractual agreement, you will be advised that account cancellation will result in a charge to your credit card for the instant rebate amount (whatever that was, as it differs depending on the length of the contract) UNLESS you are a resident of CA or OR. Well, OK, you might be advised of it anyway, but just mention again what state you're calling from. (The state you're calling to will happen to be Florida or Kentucky, depending on what buttons you press, but that's another story altogether.)

      Residents of those two states have their cancellations processed without any fee whatsoever. Anyone else gets billed. Those are the only two options in this particular dichotomy.

      P.S. If you're cancelling because you returned a computer to the place of purchase, then something's wrong. The stores participating in these promos are supposed to handle that themselves using their own internal procedures. Calling MSN customer service will get you nothing more productive than a referrel back to the store after you finish punching numbers on your touch tone and listening to the hold music. The right freebie for the right state.

  54. A little more info about the rebate by MVoelker · · Score: 4

    A friend of mine recently decided to give this a try. Pending his results, I may do the same. He decided to go to http://www.freemonitors.com, which tells you all about the MS - Viewsonic rebate, and has a complete copy of the terms and conditions per MS. The part that everybody's excited about:

    "if for any reason whatsoever you do not continue for the period of time associated with the credit that you have elected to receive, you agree that you will repay MSN the amount of the credit immediately upon termination or cancellation of your MSN Internet Access account; provided that if you are a resident of California or Oregon you will not be required to repay the credit amount."

    Whew. That was a mouthful. Anyway, it's there. Plain and simple. I wouldn't doubt that they only give you 12 dollars a month for the rest of forever, but it's still kinda cool if you live in CA or OR.



    --
    Sure, I have a thankless job. That's okay. I have a lot of (non /.)karma to burn off.
    1. Re:A little more info about the rebate by billybob · · Score: 1

      You dont understand that the rebate is given to you IN THE STORE. So you don't have to worry about microsoft pulling shit like paying you 2 bucks a month for the rest of your life, because you already saved 400 dollars when you made the purchase.

      --
      Joseph?
  55. Connecticut State Law by TheMayor · · Score: 2
    Here is the actual Connecticut State Law about Advertising Free stuph and Rebates

    Sec. 42-110b-19. Advertising "free," "reduced," "discount," "below cost," or a rebate

    It shall be an unfair or deceptive act or practice to:

    (a) Advertise any merchandise or service as free by the use of the word "free" or any other terms of similar import when the merchandise or service is not, in fact, free (see (d) below). Failure to disclose any and all terms, conditions and obligations required of the consumer shall be a violation of these regulations.

    (b) Advertise the price of merchandise or service as a reduced or sale price, or compare the price to a previous price unless the advertised price is lower than the actual, bona fide price for which the merchandise or service was offered to the public on a regular basis by the advertiser, for a reasonably substantial period of time prior to the advertisement or as a discount price, unless the advertised price is lower than. the price being charged for the same merchandise or service by other sellers in the area; provided, however, in the case of a new product, if the advertised price is less than the price which the advertiser, in good faith, expects to charge after termination of the introductory sale, there is no violation of this subsection. The actual price after the sale shall be evidence of the advertiser's good faith expectations.

    (c) Advertise the price of any merchandise as below cost, unless the price is, in fact, below the cost for which the merchandise was purchased and prepared for sale by the advertiser.

    (d) Advertise merchandise or service as free or the price of merchandise or a service as a discount, reduced, or sale price if receipt of such merchandise or service is contingent upon the purchase of other merchandise or service at a price which is higher than the actual, bona fide price at which the merchandise or service was offered to the public on a regular basis by the advertiser for a reasonably substantial period of time prior to the advertisement, or at a price which is substantially higher than the price being charged for the same merchandise or service by other sellers in the area; provided, however, in the case of a new product, if the advertised price is less than the price which the advertiser, in good faith, expects to charge after termination of the introductory sale, there is no violation of this subsection. The actual price after the sale shall be evidence of the advertiser's good faith expectations.

    (e) Advertise the availability of a manufacturer's rebate by displaying the net price of the advertised item in the advertisement, unless the amount of the manufacturer's rebate is provided to the consumer by the retailer at the time of purchase of the advertised item. A retailer will not be required to provide the purchaser of an advertised item with the amount of the manufacturer's rebate if the rebate advertises that a manufacturer's rebate is available without stating the net price of the item. For the purpose of this subsection, "net price" means the ultimate price paid by a consumer after he redeems the manufacturer's rebate offered for the advertised item.

  56. Financial Hokey-pokey? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe it's just some more innovative microsoft accounting practices? Say it's a 'Loan' and don't concider it an expense? None of the others do this... Maybe the risk of cancellations is worth not having it as an expense. Then they can write it off as a bad loan or something.

  57. flamebait? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't see it..

  58. Tell your school board... by Samrobb · · Score: 1

    MS already makes any number of grants to schools; here's another one, apparently... an excellent chance for inner city schools to finally "catch up" and equip some of their classrooms with modern machines. Hmmm... not just the schools, either. How about the students? "Mom, see, Microsoft is giving away free computers..."

    What about charitable organizations that are continually strapped for donations - the Salvation Army, women's shelters, homeless shelters, minority education programs, ...

    --
    "Great men are not always wise: neither do the aged understand judgement." Job 32:9
  59. Hey, last summer, I gave E*Trade a californian by BlueUnderwear · · Score: 1

    address. Does that make me eligible for this offer too?

    --
    Say no to software patents.
  60. Re:THIS REBATE IS FOR HOBBIT LOVERS ONLY!!111!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's the matter, you don't like Hobbits?

  61. Unfortunately they thought of that by Col.+Panic · · Score: 3

    From the application: Only one credit per address will be allowed. Multiple credit requests will not be accepted.

  62. Better Quote (severely offtopic!) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There was a radio interview I listened to about ten years ago. Some math prof from British Columbia was explaining about how bad the odds are, going on to explain that if you lined up cigarettes from one end of the country to the other, and were asked to pick the "right" one, you'd have better odds than winning the lottery.

    At the end of the interview, the interviewer asked him "so, do you play the lottery?"

    To which he replied "Every week."

    Incidentally, my New Year's resolution for this year was to win the lottery :o) (I know, it's probably not gonna come true - but if it doesn't, then at least it's not my fault this year :o)

    1. Re:Better Quote (severely offtopic!) by whoosp · · Score: 1

      One end of british columbia to the other, or one end of the USA to another? C'mon, hurry up and answer, I have to decide whether or not to buy tonight..

  63. ooh, cool, drunks.com... by Wakko+Warner · · Score: 1
    say hi to Ralph V. for me :)

    (score 0, offtopic)
    --


    "One World, one Web, one Program" - Microsoft promotional ad

    --
    "Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
  64. Abuse by Mindwarp · · Score: 1

    Surely this would be abusing a loop-hole in the legal system for financial gain; Something that this community is up in arms about when it's a big corporation trying to crush the 'righteous'.

    Food for thought...

    --

    --
    The gift of death metal does not smile on the good looking.
    1. Re:Abuse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No loop-hole. This is what microsoft lets you do if you reside in CA or OR. Plain and simple.

    2. Re: Abuse by Mindwarp · · Score: 1

      But the reason that you can do this in California and not anywhere else is because California has an extra law allowing it. This law was written to protect consumers against unscrupulous sales behavior from companies trying to piggy-back their own insurance/financing deals onto purchases. I'm pretty sure it wasn't designed to allow people to essentially rip-off a company for $400 and then cancel their contract. As I said - abuse of the legal system.

      Here's another question for you - V.A. been running a promotional where you signed up for a 3 year support contract or something and they gave you $400 to spend on hardware, would SlashDot be reporting it like this?

      --

      --
      The gift of death metal does not smile on the good looking.
  65. Don't you love the US law system by Pyrrus · · Score: 1

    Basicly law A says that law B is false and law B says that law A is true. M$ is pulling catch-22 on us!

  66. No its more like robin hood by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stealing from the evil sherif of nottingham who used his position to rip off the peasants. Robin Hood merely took the evil sheriffs ill gotten gains back. How is that immoral? Zenor like MS blows

  67. Beware the finer finer print by tooley · · Score: 2
    According to the MSN rebat e form, they may sue you under 18 USC 1341, which says...
    Whoever, having devised or intending to devise any scheme or artifice to defraud, or for obtaining money or property by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations,... [and uses US Mail to do it]... shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both. If the violation affects a financial institution, such person shall be fined not more than $1,000,000 or imprisoned not more than 30 years, or both."
    This sounds (like many US laws) very very flexible and open to the whims of the court. I wouldn't put it below M$ to try to $way the courts there in their favor. Are there lawyers out there that could comment on this (the cited code, not the joking allegation of bribery)?
    1. Re:Beware the finer finer print by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You (rhetorical, not personal) think MS would go after an individual for $400? Are you (rhetorical, again) nuts?

      It's not about the money, it's about gaining customers. Once the average Joe has setup and installed MSN on his home computer, he won't change the default home page, much less the ISP he's using. They're spending the cash on Clueless Joes across America.

      BTW, MSN, as a dial-up, is pretty good...best Linux hacker I know uses them for dial-up...

      I would expect the terms in CA and OR to change ASAP (because the cat is out of the bag).

    2. Re:Beware the finer finer print by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's your friendly neighborhood mail fraud statute. It has a buddy in section 1343 if you use wires.

      Please note that this is a CRIMINAL statute. You don't necessarily pay money to Microsoft, you go to jail. Your local federal authorities decide whether to charge you, not Microsoft.

      Ridiculous civil penalties can be obtained via the RICO statute if you can prove up all the extras the RICO requires. (Treble damages AND your attorneys fees.) Mail and wire fraud are "predicate acts" covered by RICO.

      Mind you, exercising your statutory protections under state law would seem an odd definition of "fraud."

    3. Re:Beware the finer finer print by totient · · Score: 1

      Claimed: "According to the MSN rebat e form, they may sue you under 18 USC 1341"

      No, the above link refers to the mail-in rebate and fraud such as trying to get multiple rebates by making copies of the store receipt, and other things of that nature. For the mail-in rebate, you pay the whole purchase price up front then wait for reimbursement. The instant rebate is more immediate, and the contract for it contains no such language as mentioned above.

      The stores which offer the instant option will only fall back on the mail-in option if the special system they use for creating MSN accounts is down, which is rare indeed.

      Residents of CA and OR have an ethical choice to make, but the facts are clear. They are not legally obligated to pay MSN if they should choose, for any reason, to cancel the account they created to get the instant rebate being offered with full knowledge of those applicable laws. The lawyers know this and MSN made the choice to bet enough people will like the service to offset the cost of those who merely play the system.

      I wonder how long before MSN withdraws the offer in those two states.

    4. Re:Beware the finer finer print by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In addition, the offer is for a loan, not a rebate, so the statute cites does not apply at all.

  68. Re:And the reason for this article is? by kdoherty · · Score: 1

    It has nothing to do with Linux in any way just about people who don't want to use MSN as their ISP or have to stay with them for a period of 3 years.

    Er, maybe it's just me, but I think their solution would be more along the lines of "Don't take the deal in the first place".

    The real conundrum here is why the moronic post I'm replying to was actually moderated up. The "point" made is bogus, and worth being moderated down.
    --
    Kevin Doherty
    kdoherty+slashdot@jurai.net

    --
    Kevin Doherty
    kdoherty+slashdot@jurai.net
  69. Worked for me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Okay, so it was an emachine but I got it for the price of sales tax. I'm slapping OpenBSD on it and using it for a FW for my DSL line. Thanks Micro$oft!

    MSN was very friendly when I called to cancel the account. Now I just need to get my other credit card with a different billing address and head back for another machine!

    1. Re:Worked for me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you state that you are from Oregon/California and that you should not be billed for this under the terms of the contract? I'm currious if they will slap a big bill on your account...

    2. Re:Worked for me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you have to fill out the form that Staples has posted on their web site? Our Office Depot had that form (only for Oregon and California) and from some of the wording that is different, we think they can acually get us to have to pay for it all. You have to agree to abide by the laws of Washington which would kill off the loop hole really fast. Just wondering what form you got to fill out.

    3. Re:Worked for me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong.

    4. Re:Worked for me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How did you CANCEL??? What number did you call to do it?? Please post this info!! THANKS!!

  70. not stealing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No it's like if there were 100,000 bikes with a sign that said "Bikes, leave $100 to buy (don't have to leave the $100 if your name is Anthony)", and your name was Anthony. Nothing unethical about taking a bike for free if your name is Anthony. The bike company knows that there will be people who take the bike for free, but are betting that most won't. Now, posting a message to slashdot telling people about the deal, that might be a bit unethical :).

  71. No such thing as a free lunch by fastpage · · Score: 1
    If people start doing this they should be careful because if it is deemed a loan, Microsoft could give you a black mark on your credit. And to get something removed like that is nearly impossible.

    Also the repayment appears to be charged on to your credit card, couldn't you just cancel your credit card and then cancel MSN so they can't charge you? I guess then they may just send some collection agency after you.

  72. Time for... by network51.com · · Score: 1

    some free DVD's. Thanks Bill. See you in hell.

    --


    A decent Network is finally here.
  73. My father in law did this months ago by SpamapS · · Score: 1

    I'm in California, and my father in law did the same thing, inadvertently. The credit card he used to pay for the MSN expired, and they cancelled his MSN service.. hehe.. but they never collected any more money from him. Interesting. :)

    I'm off to Best Buy, woo hoo. :)

    --
    SpamapS -- Undernet #Linuxhelp
  74. Limits? by slickwillie · · Score: 1

    I wonder if you can go to all of the stores and sign up, or even go back to the same store day after day and get $400 each time?

  75. I think it's paid in increments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I called MSN up a few weeks ago (yes, I know, I'm sorry) about the ViewSonic/MSN ``Free Monitors'' $400 rebate. The Lady who worked there said that, for CA and OR, the rebate is paid *in increments*. So, you stop MSN, they stop sending you the checks. She said she didn't know the details, though.

    My guess is this rebate works the same way. The get-your-rebate-at-checkout method looks promising, though.

  76. Re:[OT] Your Lottery sig (re: tax on the stupid) by ChadN · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately, it is more like a tax on uneducated people (a regressive tax which, ironically, is justifed as a way to pay for more public education) Wealthy people have accountants (as a last resort) who TELL them it is a losing battle, even if they are actually stupid. I know many a doctor, lawyer, etc. who play the lottery because they think it ISN'T such a bad bet!

    Of course, my scientist friend-of-a-friend's Grandma played the Lotto, and he kept trying to convince her it was an awful waste of money, until she won $14 million.

    And cigarette's are really just an even MORE regressive tax. :-)

    --
    "It's overkill, of course. But you can never have too much overkill." - Anonymous Slashdot Coward
  77. Call your state representative! by SoftwareJanitor · · Score: 2

    I think it is time for all of us non-California/Oregon residents to call our state representatives and ask them to pass a law like CA and OR have! Then we can take advantage of $400 free money from Microsoft too.

  78. don't do this by jpr1 · · Score: 1

    how about being an honest hard worker? if your the type of scum that gets excited about reading something like this in hopes of doing it yourself then you're no better than all the fools involved in the ridiculous lawsuits today (blind suing websites, parents suing pokemon, etc.) , then again screwing microsoft sure sounds fun (j/k)!

  79. Two different agreements for CA/OR & rest of US by Eric+Smith · · Score: 3
    I live in CA, but I was just in CO for the holidays. My sister needed to buy a new computer for her business, and asked me if the Compaq or HP systems advertised by OfficeMax in the 2-Jan-2000 Rocky Mountain News were any good. The most attractive was an HP Pavilion with a 466 MHz Celeron, 128M SDRAM, 40x CD-ROM, 15 inch monitor (13.8 viewable), and an inkjet printer, for $879 before rebates (if memory serves). There was a $400 rebate for three years of MSN, an three $50 rebates from OfficeMax on the CPU, monitor, and printer, for an after-rebate price of $429. (The CPU alone was available for $599, $149 after rebates.)

    When we got there, the salesman said that it was out of stock. My sister asked if any other stores had it. The salesman went away to check, and came back and said no. I asked about a rain check, and the salesman said it was discontinued. I pointed out that since they advertised it without any restrictions like "quantities are limited" or "while supplies last", that they would have to make good on it. He went to fetch the manager, who asked if we would be satisfied with a different computer. I said sure, as long as it was comparable.

    After a long wait, the manager produced a much better HP Pavilion (faster CPU, more memory, bigger hard drive, and a CD-RW) which listed for $300 more. She discounted it by $350 to match the price, including the $50 OfficeMax rebate that had been offered on the other CPU. My sister got a much better system for the same $429 price. And when we set up the computer at her office, we found that there was a $50 rebate coupon from HP for the CPU inside the box!

    Anyhow, while I was studying the flier about the MSN rebate, I noticed the language about CA and OR residents. When we opened the actual MSN signup envelope, we found that it included two separate legal agreements, one for residents of CA and OR only, and one for everyone else. I don't have them here to study in detail or quote, but a quick glance seemed to confirm that if I made a purchase myself that I would receive the rebate but not be obligated to continue the service, and would not have to repay the rebate.

    I almost bought a second computer of the same type for myself. It looks like I could have gotten the same nicer HP Pavilion as my sister (without the monitor and printer) for about $99 plus CO sales tax plus $21.95 for one month's MSN service. I didn't do it because I didn't have an extra $600 at the time, and I was doubtful that it would make a good Linux box since it uses some strange combination modem and sound card.

    So I don't have proof that CA and OR residents can take MSN for $388, but it sure looks that way. Even if it's legal, I haven't convinced myself that it's ethical.

    1. Re:Two different agreements for CA/OR & rest of US by nion · · Score: 1

      So I don't have proof that CA and OR residents can take MSN for $388, but it sure looks that way. Even if it's legal, I haven't convinced myself that it's ethical.

      I NEVER thought I'd hear someone mention 'ethical' and (some kind of) 'microsoft' in the same paragraph. Don't you realize the kind of crap they've been foisting on us for the past 10 years? If just 1% of the people who live in CA and OR who read slashdot go out and make good on this, we'll have done what M$ does to us. However even so, do you think that makes a whit of difference in the gold-plated linings of BG's pockets?

      Let us have our cake and eat it too. It's about time. :)

      --
      der dee der.
    2. Re:Two different agreements for CA/OR & rest of US by Eric+Smith · · Score: 1
      I wrote:
      $879 before rebates (if memory serves).
      Should have been "$979 before rebates".
  80. COMPUSERV by MrCawfee · · Score: 1

    Compuserv has offered the same deal: $400 rebate for a 3 year committment on a new computer. They have offered it for atleast 6 monthes in California (i live in california, i have no idea if they have it in other states, but they probally do)

  81. Free MS money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok, I just got back from Best Buy, and I'm sitll not sure if I got a deal. The term "Fair Trial" of MSN is all over the contract, which means to me that you can't cancel immediately. So, I'll pay them for a month...

    Another scary thing is that the California contract says that you're agreeing to settle the contract in Washington state. Does that mean California laws are null and void?

    But, at worse, I see myself a part of a class-action suit against Microsoft..

    The rebate is not paid in increments, but rather in a rebate check which takes 6-8 weeks. The instant rebate is a loan from Microsoft to "help get you online right away".

    Your purchase can be anything in the store but it has to be one item equal to or greater than the rebate amounts (399 doesn't qualify, but 400.01 does). The DVD players, monitors and Palm Vs are moving through that place.

  82. Yeech. by Artagel · · Score: 2

    You know, when adults cut a deal, they should hold up their end.

    The whole idea that someone would drop that because Microsoft was at the other end is just sick. I don't steal from my friends, and I don't steal from my enemies either. I don't do things like that because they're wrong.

    I guess nobody here ever paid for shareware either. I thought this was supposed to be a community that was reasonable even without government intervention. Maybe I was wrong. *sigh*

    1. Re:Yeech. by Field+Marshall+Stack · · Score: 1
      You know, when adults cut a deal, they should hold up their end.

      The whole idea that someone would drop that because Microsoft was at the other end is just sick. I don't steal from my friends, and I don't steal from my enemies either. I don't do things like that because they're wrong.

      I guess nobody here ever paid for shareware either. I thought this was supposed to be a community that was reasonable even without government intervention. Maybe I was wrong. *sigh*

      Sure, that SOUNDS good, but how are you going to justify it to the shareholders? If you live in CA or OR and you don't take advantage of this, you are clearly not exercising due diligence.
      --
      "HORSE."

      --
      "HORSE."
      -Flaming Carrot
  83. I know this is off-topic but... by seanb · · Score: 1

    Ever since Toy Story and Toy Story II, ehenever I hearr the phraze "Linux zealots" I visualize a crowd of three-eyed penguins saying thins like "The Mystic Kernel. OOOOOOOOOOH."

    1. Re:I know this is off-topic but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was really funny - lol! Wish I had some moderator points...

    2. Re:I know this is off-topic but... by lost_it · · Score: 1

      Damn that's funny! I may have to make that my sig, with seanb's permission, of course.

    3. Re:I know this is off-topic but... by seanb · · Score: 1

      P>Granted, of course.

  84. no, go to Oregon, NO SALES TAX. by nion · · Score: 1

    CA sales tax sucks, come on over to Oregon, we don't have a tax. :)

    --
    der dee der.
  85. Sweetness! by billybob · · Score: 1

    Well, I live in Oregon, and there's an officemax in my town. Think I'll go buy a cd burner, a new harddrive, and something else if that doesnt total 400 dollars. I'll try to make it cost like $405. So I pay 5 dollars at the store, cancel my damn msn contract, and get all that cool stuff for 5 bucks. If that isn't 100% pure sweetness, then I just don't know what is. :)

    --
    Joseph?
  86. Here's Your Answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    California Consumers Legal Remedies Act
    Calfornia Civil Code 1770. Unlawful practices

    (a) The following unfair methods of competition and unfair or deceptive
    acts or practices undertaken by any person in a transaction intended to
    result or which results in the sale or lease of goods or services to any
    consumer are unlawful:

    (17) Representing that the consumer will receive a rebate, discount, or
    other economic benefit, if the earning of the benefit is contingent on an
    event to occur subsequent to the consummation of the transaction.

    uh... (smile) does this reverse my normal score of 0 ? ~@~

  87. Lovely by Zico · · Score: 1

    So if you think that they're unethical, then what you're doing is sinking to their level. You're a class act, all right.

    Cheers,
    ZicoKnows@hotmail.com

  88. See you all at Best Buy tonight... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    ..or Office Depot, Staples, what have you.

    Are we going to Slashdot the shopping malls now, too?

  89. I just did it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can confirm that at Office Max in Oregon you will be given an instant "loan" of $400 off of your purchase. I just bought a Palm Vx for $49. The contract I signed says that I needn't repay the loan and that I could cancel my MSN service at any time. I'm very pleased.

  90. Real Life Office Depot Attempt in Portland, OR by speedbacon · · Score: 1
    Okay so I almost spooged at the thought of a free digital camera or one of those neato(TM) PDAs being sold these days. After composing myself I ran down to the new Office Depot here and asked to see the MSN rebate package. They handed me a packet full of papers and a CD and when asked what happens if I decide to cancel the service the courteous worker replied with

    "...you are required to fulfill the entire service plan in order to receive the proper instant credit. If you don't then you are required to pay back"

    Still not satisfied, I dug into the packet (which was interestingly labeled MSN Internet Rebate Non P.C. Oregon and California only). After looking for the key phrase mentioned in the article up on mercurycenter.com, I was left somewhat disappointed. At the very bottom of the Terms and Conditions on the MSN Instant Purchase Assistance Application was the following verbage:

    We know that you will like our service, and as an inducement to give MSN Internet Accessa full and fair trial, w are prepared to lend you a purchase credit of up to $400.00 to help you get online.

    Upon acceptance of your application, The Microsoft Network, L.L.C. (MSN) will advance to your credit at Office Depot the amount designated above provided you sign up for unlimited MSN Internet Access services when you purchase an eligible product from Office Depot. To qualify for this program: (1) this form must be completed fully; (2) you must sign page 1 to show that you agree to the terms and conditions described in this application and the MSN Membership Agreement which is attached to this form; and (3) a copy of the receipt reflecting your purchase of an eligible product from Office Depot between November 20, 1999 and March 31, 2000 must be attached to this application. You are not obligated to continue as a MSN Internet Access member for any particular length of time.

    ...

    a This MSN Instant Purchase Assistance program is available only to residents of California and Oregon through participating Office Depot stores located in California and Oregon.

    By signing on page one, I warrant that I am 18 years old or older and that all information supplied by or about me is accurate. As more fully explained in Attachment 1 (Terms and Conditions), I agree to repay MSN the full Reimbursement Amount if my MSN Internet Access membership is terminated or cancelled before the end of the period associated with my purchase credit.

    sigh, am I missing something? when will I learn...

  91. Bah by behzad · · Score: 1

    bah, and i was getting very enthusiastic about all of this. I'm in California and when i saw this post on slashdot, i got very very hyper.. I mean a free computer.. that's better than the one i have. but of course, i see this message.. and am i dissapointed? YES! If anyone here has gotten this to work, and gotten the free computer... tell me so, i don't like hearing something that can be done.. I WANT TO SEE IT :P
    ok.. well that's my $400 worth of opinion :)..
    bye

  92. A quick point.... by Cyberllama · · Score: 1

    I work at one of the retail stores mentioned in the article, and it might be worth mentioning that the article says "you don't have to repay the money". Thats all good and well, however in order to sign up you must use a credit card and if you cancel the 400 dollars is automatically billed to your credit card. So if your a californian, what do you do? Call the credit card company and contest the charge? I'd like to know..

  93. I tried it by brarrr · · Score: 1

    My roommates and I heard about this on monday and tried it that night at office max. We had heard that the forms had been updated at some stores and not at others, but knew a few people who had done the deed. Went in and the forms had been updated with one form for CA/OR and one for the other states, also the rebate was changed to mail in only, not instant. this was in San Luis Obispo, CA

    --
    to email me: take my /. handle and append .net preceded by charter.
  94. interesting math by penguinboy · · Score: 1

    2 27GB drives ($200 each) + 1 card ($50) = 54GB for $450. Once you subtract the $400 MS rebate, the cost for you is only $50. Where you got the $80 figure I don't know.

    1. Re:interesting math by LogicX · · Score: 1

      What's California's tax? I don't know off the top of my head.. but I'm sure on $450 of goods, the tax could easily be $30 :P (boy if this wasn't slightly off-topic.. heh)

      --
      May this post be indexed by spiders, and archived for all to see as my Internet epitaph.
    2. Re:interesting math by Amazing+Proton+Boy · · Score: 1

      8.25%

      I get $487.25. You are responsible for the tax on the entire amount.

    3. Re:interesting math by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      7.25% in most of the state actually, and the rebate does count for tax. I spent $390 and had $29.xx tax and only had to pay $19.xx.

  95. Linux fools, go ahead moderate this down.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    G0d damn linux people keep touting Linux this, linux that.. what the fsck is wrong with you people? Ok, so windows was forced upon us but we're used to it and even IF some software is bloated we get our shit done and get to play some cool games (if you got the system for it) Windows does what we want, nothing is perfect and neither is linux. Until linux can be installed by an experienced windows user I won't touch it with a 10 foot pole.

    And moderators, go the hell ahead and put me down as flamebait but USE YOUR BRAIN and think about both sides of the story. I've also noticed you asshole moderators score everything to 0 or less when someone posts as an anonymous coward even when the post is very intelligent. Fsuck this create an account thing.. just one more thing to collect info on.

    1. Re:Linux fools, go ahead moderate this down.. by blj8 · · Score: 1

      ACs post at 0 by default. Registered users post at 1 by default.

  96. Best Buy has changed it by exodus2 · · Score: 1

    They now have a diffrent agreement for california and oregon residents. I went this evening after work to get me one,

    --
    .sigs suck, thus nothing here.
    1. Re:Best Buy has changed it by caferace · · Score: 1
      They now have a diffrent agreement for california and oregon residents. I went this evening after work to get me one,

      And?

    2. Re:Best Buy has changed it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      We're waiting with antici......

      ...pation

    3. Re:Best Buy has changed it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MSN ceased the instant credit at Best Buy (and other places presumably) this morning at about 11AM. Now you have to pay and sign up for a mail-in rebate. This would NOT fall under the Calif State lending law and therefore people who are still trying to sign up for MSN and get $400 off, will be responsible for paying back MSN for the whole amount should they cancel their MSN service. From what I've heard (my friend Kirk just went to Best Buy and OfficeMax) there are still many dozens of people at the stores who are still trying to cash in--even with the mail-in rebate. Little do they know, they are SOL *sigh*.

      I missed out because they didn't have the stuff I wanted (better to get something you really want in case everything falls thru and you're stuck paying for it) and I was being a little too cautious. My roomate, however, got a Xerox laser printer and a Visioneer 7600 scanner-I'll definitely be using ;P Oh yeah, that's because you only get one $400 discount per address/household.

    4. Re:Best Buy has changed it by ponyboy · · Score: 1

      Ooow. That blows. Is this just at one store? Office Max has always had only the mail in rebate. Did they change the actual contract?

      What a bummer! Can anybody else confirm this?

  97. A cheap marketing ploy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are trying to create the illusion that Windoze and MSN are so incredibly, insanely great that they have to pay people not to use them.

  98. Re:[OT] My favorite description of the lottery... by Lancer · · Score: 1
    I've for years called it the "Gullible Tax" - and I'll continue to do so, until my Mom wins!

    --
    Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside a dog it's too dark to read. - Groucho Marx
  99. The rebate does not work! by fewl · · Score: 1

    I just came from Best Buy. Their customer rep said that if you cancel the ISP during the 1st year, you have a $400 cancellation fee. $200 during the 2nd and $100 during the third. You'll still make some money in the end, but not the full $400 like we all wish it would be. :(

    --
    Your actions on earth echo in eternity.
  100. Does social security number == $400 by NoWhereMan · · Score: 1
    This social security issue goes much further than just your credit report. I went to the local store and asked the sales clerk about this requirement. It seems to me that a federal law was passed years ago making it more difficult to extract this number.

    I personally would not trust MS with piece of data. Has anyone signed up without yielding this item?

  101. I visited the Best Buy in Redwood City, CA by diagnosis · · Score: 1

    disclaimer: I am not a lawyer.

    So I went to a local Best Buy in the bay area to check this out, and the place was quite a zoo. There was a separate line for people with the MSN instant rebates, and it was moving quite slowly; the sales manager had, at his discretion, limited the rebate to purchases of a single item (it sounds to me like the contract gives him the ability to do this, but it's really not very clear). The woman in front of me in line was quite upset about this, and claimed that stores in Milpitas and L.A. were allowing multiple-item purchases.

    Best Buy was actually almost out of forms when I got there; however, my friend snagged a couple from somewhere in the back of the store. A woman I talked to up front was printing more out, but I am not sure if she actually got around to handing them out -- it seemed like they were trying to limit the number of people making purchases that day.

    I hung around the front of the line for a while, and people were succesfully completing purchases (of a single, expensive item) with a rebate; they received their MSN accounts on the spot (oh boy). However, the line was moving at a snail's pace, and at around 8:15 someone announced on the PA that registers would close at 9:00 and they would not be able to process any more requests at that point. He explicitly stated that the program would continue through March, and suggested (pleaded) that people come back later. He made a similar announcement a few more times, although the closing time moved back to 9:15; my friends decided to take off, and I followed them, since I didn't want them to have to walk home. As we were leaving, one of my friends claimed he heard the sales manager say the Mercury would be printing a retraction tomorrow, but I cannot think of any reason to believe the sales manager. He seemed a little slimy. I suppose we'll find out more tomorrow.

    I have read through the OR/CA offer thoroughly any number of times, and it seems very clear that the buyer is in no way obligated to repay MS in the event of cancellation, and the buyer is also not obliged to continue using MSN for any specific period of time. The offer is valid until 3/31/00; it seems to me that the only thing MS and Best Buy could do would be to switch to mail-in rebates, instead of instant credit (there is a line which says they may do that).

    At any rate, pending any bizarre revelations, I plan to take advantage of this offer in the next few days. I would even be willing to get stuck with a month or two of MSN charges.

    1. Re:I visited the Best Buy in Redwood City, CA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed, the Redwood City folks were lame...I got the 'one item' line too. By the time I got to the Milpitas store they were turning people away. I dont see why BB would put limitations on purchases...the $$$'s coming out of MS's pockets - not theirs. Of course, the store was out of DVD players, so I was out of luck either way. There's always tomorrow!

  102. Gave It a Go by voodooc · · Score: 1
    Well. This has been exciting.

    Myself, 4 of the guys from my department, and one other manager and developer all got caught up in the frenzy and stampeded en masse to the Best Buy down the street. The chronometer hit 5:00 PM and we were gone.

    Once on location, I forged ahead and engaged BB personnel whilst my cohorts faded into the aisles. The pimply-faced chap in computers was immediately suspicious when I asked about the deal. His first question: "Who told you?" Grinning innocently, "Told me about what?" "Did somone from the store call you?" "No dude, it's all over the net." "Where?" "Slashdot." "Whats that?" Grin. "Nevermind."

    I reviewed the contract for about 15 minutes and decided to plunge ahead. Blinded by peer pressure and the tantalizing proximity of so many easy goodies, the entire rest of the gang followed.

    Since installing my loooovely new speakers and receiver, I've taken the time to really think about the possibilities here and carefully check the contract. I would humbly offer to the readership the following:

    1. Opening paragraph. "We know that you will like our service ... to give MSN ... a full and fair trial [and] are prepared to lend you a purchase credit of up to $400.00 to help you get online." (emphasis added). I interpret this asinine statement as, they are willing to 'lend' me $400 worth of toys to _try_ their service. Hey, whatever floats their boat, I'm happy to oblige.
    2. "You are not obligated to continue as a MSN Internet Access member for any particular length of time." Well, hot damn! That pretty much wraps up any doubt for me.
    3. The only places they mention repaying the purchase credit, is if you return a portion of your purchase for a refund, and "the total amount of your purchase less the refund is less than the Purchase Credit." In that case, your Purchase Credit is nullified, but you are liable to pay Best Buy the difference (the rest of the stuff you got with the Purchase Credit).

    Of course, I see several potential risks. I think all of them are avoidable with minimal effort.

    1. MSN bills you anyways. I'm hoping this is easily fixed with a call to the credit card company. Nowhere did I give authorization for MSN to hit my credit card for $400. I will dispute any such charge, and my understanding is that without evidence, MSN's charge will be reversed.
    2. MSN hits your credit report. Again, I'm hoping this can be fixed by disputing with the credit reporting agency. I have a contract that explicitly says I have no obligation.
    3. The fraud thing that was brought up. Well, I'm certainly not trying to defraud MSN. They know I will like their service. They are so confident that I will like it, they are going to 'lend' me $400 purchase credit, that they are never going to require me to pay back.

    So, legally, I feel like I'm in the clear. The contract being offered 'lends' me a purchase credit of $400 to give MSN Internet Access 'a full and fair trial'. I fully intend to hold up my side of the bargin. Ethically, I also don't have any qualms about this. Most telling was the quote in the news article I read from the MSN guy, who was delightfully arrogant enough to basically say he was aware of the situation, but was so confident that people would love MSN that he wasn't concerned. Well, power to you, brother! I'm more than happy to give MSN a fair shake. God bless their little hearts. Of course, I'm going to have to borrow an external analog modem. I don't use one currently. :} -- calnetX-XX.gtecablemodem.com sd

    1. Re:Gave It a Go by g-girl · · Score: 1

      I also gave it a go yesterday and was wondering if anyone out there has actually CANCELLED their MSN yet. If so, HOW do you do it? Is there a number you call or can you cancel somewhere online??? thanks!

  103. UnSweetness! by voodooc · · Score: 1
    Er, no flame intended...

    I took MSN up on their offer too. However posting something like that is the wrong way to approach it. You're explicitly saying you intend to take up MSN on the no-obligation-'loan' without ever giving their service a fair trial.

    This smells legally shaky to me, as well as ethically dubious.

    Spin, baby, it's all about spin.

    sd

  104. - by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    boo! i scared you!

  105. Bzzzt by Last+Post! · · Score: 0

    20 billion is what they have in cash. More than that, and they have to start selling the farm.

  106. Followup Mercury article by eswierk · · Score: 1

    There's a followup article on MercuryCenter describing the mayhem at the Best Buy in Milpitas, and reaffirming Microsoft's position.

  107. the lawyers always win. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wouldn't suprise me if the bar association put microsoft up to this.

  108. This is a test by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't like microsoft all that mutch. Spesially since they wrote NT workstation...

  109. Re:[OT] My favorite description of the lottery... by charlesc · · Score: 1

    I've heard this gullible tax thing before, and I have to protest somewhat. I don't consider myself gullible, but I do play the lottery. Why? Because it's fun! It's fun to get that little ticket and think, no matter how poor the odds, that there might be a nice little prize under those little silver rub-off squares. I've certainly paid out more than I've won on the lottery, I have no illusions about that. But it's entertained me, and I don't really think paying for this form of entertainment makes me any more gullible than the guy who goes out and buys the latest wearable prototype computer that eventually joins the hardware stockpile on the basement floor with the TRS-80. It's all about having fun - the fun just takes different forms.

    Chuck.

    --
    "So many ways to skin a cat, and still everyone uses a great big knife."
  110. Anyone Done It And Cancelled? by owillis · · Score: 1

    Has anyone done this and cancelled yet?

    --
    OliverWillis.Com
    An Operative with an Agenda
  111. after talking to best buys employees... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So the Best Buy employee I talked to claimed that if you cancel within the first month, Best Buy would be forced to eat the $400 by their deal with MS, and so would refund your purchase! (As in he claimed they'd take it back, and give you back your money) I just wonder how he expects that'll work... Will they come by your house to pick it up??? ;) Anyways, he didn't know what MS would do if you cancelled after the 1st month... so who knows... PS - you can't buy anything below $400 and still get the $400 off - nice try, though...

  112. The sum of my experience with this . . . by ponyboy · · Score: 1

    Its all real as far as I can tell so far. Here's what happened:

    I did the MSN deal yesterday. The girl at the Best Buy cash register thought she messed up with the transaction since she kept getting an error message while trying to setup my account. So, she (thought) she cancelled the first try, and then started over.

    Last night I realized that I had gotten two accounts since my receipt gave me the login of her first attempt. I was able to login using the first account. I called MS and they verified that I had been signed up for two accounts (I unfortunately only got $400 out of it - ONLY, that's funny).

    When I told the MS operator the story and told her that I didn't want a $22 charge for the second account, she said, you won't be charged since you are cancelling it. Then she said, "but you'll have to pay MSN back the $400 credit". When I told her I was from CA she said, "Oh! Then you're fine. No problems."

    She closed the (second) account without further questions.

    Lessons:

    1) You CAN cancel without any penalty
    2) If you do you do not need to pay back the $400
    3) They don't seem to be verifying that you are not signing up for multiple accounts (I did it by accident. Same name, address, credit card, etc.)

    This is the golden goose gang. But if you run the software (we are after all being payed to at least look) watch out what MSN puts on your computer. I have no proof yet, but I'm almost positive that it scanned my system and then attempted to send a report to MS.If I was dialed in through MSN then they could now have my name, address, soc sec #, credit card #, system hardware config, OS version, what apps are on my system, and my Windows serial number. Usefull to MS I'd say.

    Sorry so long. Lots of usefull info I hope.

    1. Re:The sum of my experience with this . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hi, I'm particularly interested in this point: I'm almost positive that it scanned my system and then attempted to send a report to MS.If I was dialed in through MSN then they could now have my name, address, soc sec #, credit card #, system hardware config, OS version, what apps are on my system, and my Windows serial number. Have you been able to determine definitively whether it did this? Do you have any other information? If so, please contact me at dkong@sjmercury.com. Thanks.

  113. Phone number to cancel by Rherndon · · Score: 1

    No I have not done it yet, but I do have the number.

    1-800-386-5550

    or try this more general number I got from a Best Buy employee today. They sounded very tired. ;-)

    1-800-373-3676

  114. Yes, it works by SolarisBoi · · Score: 1

    My office made a trip out of this. After lunch we decided to see if it worked. We trotted over to Best Buy, and walked out with quite a bit of new electronic equipment. Yes boys and girls, that's right... Best Buy allows you to buy ANYTHING in the store.

    I walked out with a 27" PnP Sony TV for about $80 (after rebate). All we had to agree on was that we would give MSN a "fair trial", but the agreement explicitly states that you are under no obligation to complete the 3 year commitment. You may cancel at any time.

    We got back to the office, called MSN, cancelled, and that was that. Upon our return, our remaining staff quickly dashed over to Best Buy to take advantage of this offer. If you're a CA or OR resident, jump on this while you can. Given the amount of people jumping on this bandwagon, and the amount of merchandise being sold (RAM, Sony DVD players, and misc computer equipment were already sold out when we arrived) I'd advise you to take advantage of this while you still can.

    And for those paranoid that it may backfire, according to Best Buy's CA and OR contract you may return the items purchased for a full refund and cancellation of your MSN account without any repurcussions.

    Just wanted to let everyone know that this thing is as real as it gets. It's like Christmas all over again!

  115. Went to Best Buy last night by kmdb · · Score: 1

    Got a 27" tv and some little things, paid ten dollars and change. My friend bought a new dvd player and a soda for forty eight dolars and change. Yes, we are in California. Yes, we will be cancelling shortly. They ran out of the in-store rebate contracts, so they gave us the mail-in rebate ones but processed them at check-out. Perfect...though I don't feel to well about the post "Yes, it works by SolarisBoi (Score:1) Thu January 06, 07:32 PM PDT."

    1. Re:Went to Best Buy last night by kmdb · · Score: 1

      yeah, i'm replying to my own post. i meant to refer to this one: The sum of my experience with this . . . by ponyboy (Score:1) Thu January 06, 04:42 PM PDT, talking about msn copying my computer's info and sucking onto their servers. not that my whole *identity* isn't floating around as binary information, ready for anyone to steal. i'm rather impressed that our technological advancements have reduced personal identities to numbers for anyone to pick up and run with--so i'm not terribly concerned with msn's dealings.

  116. Re:Free money...info from a Best Buy employee by Coffee+Man · · Score: 1

    I work at Best Buy here in Calif. What people don't realize is that when they sign up, then cancel after the first month, they don't have to pay the $400 back...but they will get a black mark on their credit report from MSN. I don't think $400 worth of stuff is worth 7 years of credit headaches....but then thats just my opinion.

  117. Re:Free money...info from a Best Buy employee by ponyboy · · Score: 1

    Someone please correct me if I am wrong, but in order for a company to put a black mark on your credit history, I believe that they have to be able to prove that they did due dilligence in attempting to get you to pay back any default.

    If MS does not attempt to contact you and get the money back, then they are on shakey grounds with dinging people (especially if they do it to hundreds of people at once). Following this logic, if you are in threat of being dinged, then you will know about it first, and have the opportunity to deal with it before it happens.

    So, Coffee Man, I am curious to know, how have you arrived at the conclusion that MSN will black mark people who quit early?

  118. It really works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One friend bought a Sony CD player and changer for his car. Another friend bought a new washer. Another friend bought a Yamaha stereo. It was mad looting at Best Buy...waits of over 4 hours and entire stores were almost empty of everything. No cell phones. No DVD players. No digital cameras. And it's all for real: http://www.latimes.com/business/updates/lat_rebate 000107.htm Too bad the free $400 is over.

  119. Zillions of pple taking advantage of the rebate by cyberdonny · · Score: 1
  120. Re:[OT] My favorite description of the lottery... by cainem · · Score: 1

    It's just as much fun if you don't buy a ticket. You just pick your numbers, and sit down in front of the TV as usual. Try it, it's just as exciting (if not more so), and cheaper.

    I don't see any point in buying losing tickets. The only ticket worth buying is the winning one, so I'm gonna wait for that :-)

  121. Re:Free money...info from a Best Buy employee by Coffee+Man · · Score: 1

    The reason why I know that MS will black mark a person for joining and then quiting...is because i have talked directly to a MS rep. Also all today (Jan 7) MSN has been closed...and will more than likely go to a mail in reabate.

  122. Snafu prompts Microsoft to suspend some PC rebates by The_Moo_Cow · · Score: 1

    Microsoft has suspended its MSN rebate programs in California and Oregon because a contract provision unintentionally allows customers in those states to wring $400 out of the software giant.

    See: Cnet