Slashdot Mirror


IBM Offers Computer Recycling

rjh3 writes: "IBM is offering to recycle old PC's (monitor included) for $29.99. They've made a deal with Envirocycle to do the recycling and UPS for discount shipping. The old computers are assessed and either refurbished and donated, or stripped for usable parts, recyclable content, and the remnants sent to disposal. Envirocycle has found a way to recycle the highly leaded glass in CRTs and removes much of the toxic lead content in the electronics." Read on for more information on why you might want to take them up on the offer.

"Many readers are probably unaware that used electronics, including TVs and monitors, are already categorized as a hazardous waste by the US EPA. Unsafe disposal by any business can lead to some staggering costs. The EPA does not inspect your trash. But if they find your monitor at an unsafe waste site, you are 100% responsible for cleaning up that entire site. They go after everyone who contributed to the site and just keep going until everyone is bankrupt or the site is cleaned. There is no proportional allocation. One PC is enough to be charged the entire site cleanup cost.

Consumers not exempt, but there is no point in prosecuting them. They don't have enough money and the political cost to the EPA is too high.

If you do not already have a suitable electronics disposal plan in place, this may be of interest. Most Massachusetts towns have a recycling plan in place because Massachusetts already prohibits consumer disposal of electronics in the regular trash. There are also a variety of donation programs for usable electronics, although many charities have become rather restrictive. They have been burned by people donating broken useless equipment and forcing the charity to pay the recycling disposal fees."

197 comments

  1. Dime for a Quarter... by BrK · · Score: 2

    Why do I get the feeling that IBM is essentially offering to buy dollars from people for the low, low price of $.25? I think that IBM will reap much more than $30 on average for each PC that it recylces...

    --
    -This sig intentionally left blank
    1. Re:Dime for a Quarter... by jekk · · Score: 1
      If that's so, they why haven't you... or anyone else for that matter... offered to buy them for $25? It's called the "free market".

      -- Michael Chermside

    2. Re:Dime for a Quarter... by BrK · · Score: 2

      If that's so, they why haven't you... or anyone else for that matter... offered to buy them for $25? It's called the "free market".

      Well, for starters, if IBM is offering ~$30.00 per PC, and you want to entice people to go through you, instead of IBM, you'd be well off to offer MORE money for their junk, not less.

      Of course, you also have to have the cash on-hand to pay people with, and you have to have an infrastructure in place to support the whole operation. Personally, I don't want to trade $30,000+ of my money for 1000 outdated PC's. That still doesn't change the fact that this is more of a money-making operation for IBM than it is a good-will operation.

      --
      -This sig intentionally left blank
    3. Re:Dime for a Quarter... by BrK · · Score: 2

      I am sure that IBM is not going to lose a whole bunch on this, but there isn't a whole lot you are going to do with some vintage equipment. E.g. what is the current market for working VT320 terminals. Well, the answer is not much. I sold one on ebay for all of $1
      I mean they're worth something to IBM in the sense that they can pay $30 for the unit, make it an assest of the company, take a tax break for the $30/unit they pay out, then get money from the recycler for the gold, steel, etc that is "mined" from the PC.

      --
      -This sig intentionally left blank
    4. Re:Dime for a Quarter... by HiyaPower · · Score: 2

      Of course all of this effort you mention doesn't cost anything. Net profit = income - expense. Not all things in an object are what they seem. Salvaged crushed cars make crappy steel because they have aluminum alternators om them. Aluminum in steelmaking make lousy steel. Electronics have all sorts of other crud in them that makes salvage a bit hard too. I wish them luck and hope they do make a profit so other folks get into the biz. As a taxpayer, I have to pay my town to get rid of this stuff. If there are profit centers here, maybe other folks will get into the biz of bidding for my old junk.

    5. Re:Dime for a Quarter... by irksome · · Score: 1

      IBM is charging people $30, not paying people $30. They make money all around

      -

    6. Re:Dime for a Quarter... by HiyaPower · · Score: 2

      I am sure that IBM is not going to lose a whole bunch on this, but there isn't a whole lot you are going to do with some vintage equipment. E.g. what is the current market for working VT320 terminals. Well, the answer is not much. I sold one on ebay for all of $1, and the buyer begged to back out when he found out I wasn't local to him. In MA, the trash won't pick it up, Goodwill won't take them, and they take up space. Unless you want to find a friendly dumpster after hours, you are stuck with it. Sure, you turn some into routers, intranet file servers, etc. but how many does any one person need? Ever try and give away a 386?

  2. trash by knurr · · Score: 1

    To get rid of trash in that manner is only good if your a big company... Its a good idea though. I mean the enviorment wins in the long run.

    --
    If we refuse to be flexible, we are in effect opting out of the game of life. The world moves on without us.
  3. Re:Recycle Computer Parts? by ecloud · · Score: 1
    First of all 386's are not worthless; they can run Linux. But, you have to ask whether it's a good use of electricity.

    I also think recycling should be done for free, and probably is in most decent-sized cities by the scrap dealers (who sometimes actually pay for stuff).

  4. What about the Tron people living in the computer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
    All those poor little programs, just recycled without having a say in the matter. I think we need to take their feelings into consideration.

    As shows like Tron and Reboot have shown us, the little programs living in our computers have feelings too.

    This is an outrage.

  5. Re:Recycle Computer Parts? by ecloud · · Score: 1

    How old is your daughter? Is she single? Sounds like my kinda girl. :-)

  6. Re:muahahah! by Walker+Evans · · Score: 1

    recently, some of my roomates and i bought a few 14" monitors for $5 each, and wired them all together to provide for music video and other visual displays at large parties that we hold.

    So not only do we save the environment from choking on computer pollution (???), we also provide hours of drunken entertainment for college kids. (not that it's some sort of otherwise unachieveable feat)....

    --
    Shameless Self Promotion : Webhosting at Blender Networks.
  7. Re:Apply the concept of cans on it. by Walker+Evans · · Score: 1

    "Why do I recycle? Not because I really really care about the environment, but because I had to pay extra for each can, and upon recycle I got them back."

    but with this, you're not getting money back. you're paying extra! would you still recycle cans if you had to PAY 3 cents a can to get them recycled?

    --
    Shameless Self Promotion : Webhosting at Blender Networks.
  8. Re:Odd by FyreFiend · · Score: 1

    See if the local thrift shop will take it. There are people who will buy it off them. I have friends who loves old computers and looks for them at thrift shops (their on the east coast and the shipping wouldn't be worth it.

    -Fyre

    --
    - Apple Computer......proudly going out of business for over twenty years.
  9. Re:Recycling by sinnergy · · Score: 2

    I wish I could remember the article that stated that many African nations wish we would stop dumping our useless crap on their shores. Specifically, they're begging the US and other nations from sending them old XTs, 286s and even 386s, of which they have little or no use for. We think it's generosity, however, they think it rude that we dump stuff that no one really wants. They argued that those old hunks of junk won't help them teach folks how to use the internet and are hardly modern enough to even begin giving their students the footwork they need to compete in a global economy. Remember, many of the brightest and best will eventually leave their home country for a University education either in Western Europe or the US. With a background strictly in obsolete technology, they would already be at a significant disadvantage.

    Man, I wish I had that URL. *sigh*. I hate making it look like I'm pulling this stuff out of my ear. I assure you I'm not. If someone does have a relevant link to back this up, please post it. I would be interested in keeping it handy.

    In short, don't assume that anyone wants you really old junk. It's often more of a problem than a gift.

  10. Re...cy...cling...? by Kohath · · Score: 1

    I'm sorry. I'm not familiar with that term you adorable little raggamuffin.

  11. Re:Simple by Eccles · · Score: 1

    Who's going to pay to get their computer recycled?

    Businesses.

    --
    Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
  12. Re:Good program, but ... by AnarchySoftware · · Score: 5

    I'm a volunteer at FreeGeek. We actually exchange volunteer hours for the refurbished computers, as opposed to giving them away outright.

    The project is new. Our "grand opening" isn't even until this Saturday. (Originally timed for *after the election*, so we could get political officials interested enought to come, ironically.)

    We're pulling in a variety of systems, from 8086's on up to dual Pentium Pros. The entire internal network for the organization has been pulled from the trash heap (with a few donations and maybe a couple hundred dollars spent on a DSL router and a few necessary cables.)

    We're getting interest from a number of local high tech companies, and we've gotten 501(c)(3) status (that is, the IRS allows donations to us to be tax deductable).

    If we can make a go of this, it may be reproduceable in other communities.

  13. Re:Good program, but ... by LordNimon · · Score: 1

    In Austin, TX, there is a Goodwill Computer Works which takes hardware/software donations and resells them. It's also a great place to pick up a 15" monitor and keyboard, among other things.
    --

    --
    And the men who hold high places must be the ones who start
    To mold a new reality... closer to the heart
  14. Re:Whatever by fatphil · · Score: 1

    Yeah, that's the way to do it.
    I have a perfectly working 486/33 with all the bits except a case, I've been told a student is using it as his houses linux print-server or something. I charged him $0 for it, he charged me $0 to take it off my hands, we're both happy.

    Phil

    --
    Also FatPhil on SoylentNews, id 863
  15. It's even worse than you think by John+Jorsett · · Score: 3

    The EPA does not inspect your trash. But if they find your monitor at an unsafe waste site, you are 100% responsible for cleaning up that entire site. More than that, if the EPA finds any connection, however tenuous, between a business 'dumping' at a Superfund site and a successor business, they'll come after you. One guy got dragged into a Superfund site cleanup because he bought some used trucks from the going-out-of-business dumper (before anyone knew about the toxic site situation). Kafka couldn't have written a better law than Superfund.

  16. liar, liar, pants on fire! by SethJohnson · · Score: 1


    Damn this infernal contraption. It posted before I had gotten behind the steering wheel.

    What I meant to say here was that LinuxPPC does not run on the computer specified (6116CD PowerMac).

    From the LinuxPPC website:

    "LinuxPPC runs on PowerPC computers with a PCI bus. If your computer is NuBus-based, you can run MkLinux. LinuxPPC will not run on these machines."

    So I guess this 11 year old you've been observing is a pretty tough-ass hacker to have ported LinuxPPC to a nubus computer like the 6116CD. Whoah!

    But to get serious here for a minute and address the original poster's comment about installing Win2k on these charity boxes...Who is going to foot the bill for the license? The OS alone will cost more than what these computers are worth. And if the hardware could handle Win2k, then it doesn't sound like it's going to be donated to the charities anytime soon. To state the obvious, this looks like an ideal situation for a free OS that runs on obsolete hardware. There are plenty of choices out there....



    Seth
    1. Re:liar, liar, pants on fire! by naasking · · Score: 1

      Perhaps he meant MkLinux? It was originally based off of LinuxPPC and it runs on many Nubus based Macs.

      -----
      "People who bite the hand that feeds them usually lick the boot that kicks them"

    2. Re:liar, liar, pants on fire! by AArthur · · Score: 3

      Actually, LinuxPPC was based off of MkLinux. MkLinux was orginally sponsered by Apple, and was the first Linux to be ported to PowerMacs. If you are interested in running monolithic (standard) Linux on your Nubus PowerMac, you will be happy to know there is some support for these machines in 2.4. More can be found at nubus-pm ac.sourceforge.net</a>

  17. Re:Here's a link by Rexxxy · · Score: 2

    Joke's on you, Mr. Coward.

    Didn't you notice that you were linking to the web site of the Natural Resources Defense Council, a prominent science- and law-based environmental group? You linked to Appendix A of a comprehensive and informative report REFUTING the content of that New York Times Magazine article you were so proud of.

    In most cases, for most people, recycling is a Good Thing. It's not good for raw materials extraction company execs.

    Read the whole damn thing here: http://www.nrdc.org/cities/recycling/recyc/recyinx .asp

  18. Re:Odd by bitMonster · · Score: 1

    I have a complete, working MAC+ that needs a good home. I hate to throw it out. It's probably a collector's item to somebody.

    I live in the Bay Area. Any suggestions?

  19. Good program, but ... by Meatloaf · · Score: 5
    In Portland, Oregon, I believe we have something better going. A local charity, called FreeGeek will take any old technology off your hands free of charge.

    If said technology is still usable, they will give it, along with training, to a needy individual, in the hopes that this person will be able to use this training to start a career, and get a better life for him/herself.

    If the technology you donate has outlived its usefulness, FreeGeek will pick it apart and recycle the basic components or elements. All of this is free of charge, but if you are giving them recyclables, they will ask for a small cash donation (not required).

    But of course, Oregon is a pretty green state. Gore barely defeated Ralph Nader for the presidency here, 46% to 6%.

    I'm assuming there are other programs like this around the country, but I don't know. What's your city doing?

    --
    Uncle Sam sent me to the Persian Gulf, and all I got was this lousy Syndrome!
    1. Re:Good program, but ... by Meatloaf · · Score: 1
      Well, Richard, I think I'll be seeing you at the opening. I have not started working with FreeGeek yet, as you may have guessed, since I got one of the basic facts wrong in my post, but I've been approached by at least two different people familiar with the project to volunteer. I also have some connections that may be able to make some equipment donations. See you on PLUG.

      TTFN!
      Sean

      --
      Uncle Sam sent me to the Persian Gulf, and all I got was this lousy Syndrome!
    2. Re:Good program, but ... by lw54 · · Score: 1
      I'm assuming there are other programs like this around the country, but I don't know. What's your city doing?

      Around here we drive up in the ozark mountains and chunk them over a cliff. :-)

      It's kinda funny that our current EE seniors have developed a solar powered hidden camera system to catch this type of thing.

      Yes, this was a joke... Please don't take away what little karma I have.

  20. I dont care how old a PC is... by piku · · Score: 2

    ...you can ALWAYS find a use for it. Hell, old 386DX's will run Sim City 2000, Doom, Doom 2, and many many many many many many other games just fine.

    And if you want to do something productive, you can run word processors on them as well. And fill it with porn.

    1. Re:I dont care how old a PC is... by piku · · Score: 2

      Did I say SX? I said DX :)

      Doom 1 and 2 played fine on my 386DX/33 with 4 megs of RAM (I just had to use a bootdisk to play them).

  21. I've always found it easy... by Ron+Harwood · · Score: 2

    ...to either just give a computer to the local amity/goodwill or to configure it with Linux and give it to one of the newbies at my user group.

    I don't have to pay anything - and someone benefits.

  22. Re:Really Neat! by optize · · Score: 1

    You could always sell them on eBay! Go Bush! Go!

  23. Re:Uncle Vinny's Discount Computer Disposal by optize · · Score: 1

    This has to be the dumest thing I've seen all day! A P3-500 Isn't THAT old! Of course, I have a AMD 700, but a 500 isn't old, You could sell it, for a few hundred, then having to pay someone to get rid of it for you.

  24. ARRRGH! by cr0sh · · Score: 2

    How about instead of companies paying to have computers recycled, they ask their employees whether they need a computer or not!

    I would love it if the company I worked for, instead of paying another company to take care of it, or dumping the machine in the trash, would instead give me the machine to replace my old machine, or at least have parts to replace my old machine.

    Sure - it won't be top of the line - but maybe it might be a 300 Mhz AMD or something to replace my aging Pentium 100. I am sure there are many employees who would love this (esp. if they needed a new laptop or something).

    Worse case, give 'em to the local geeks to play with! Myself, at every company I worked for, I made it known to the IT dept that if there was any hardware being thrown out, to let me know about it - I would take it off their hands. I have gotten a lot of good hardware this way.

    I support the EFF - do you?

    --
    Reason is the Path to God - Anon
  25. Re:Recycling wastes even more by Eccles · · Score: 3

    This site disagrees, and claims various bits of supporting evidence from DOE, municipal governments, and other sources.

    Don't just dogmatize your beliefs, investigate them!

    --
    Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
  26. We pay them? by TheAngryArmadillo · · Score: 1

    We have to pay them to take our stuff? They say they will try to refurb and donate to non-profits thus garnering themselves a tax write-off. This is a win-win for them.

    Why the hell didn't I think of it? :-)

    TheAngryArmadillo

    --
    "Government is good at only one thing: It breaks your legs, hands
    you a pair of crutches, and says, 'See, without us you wouldn't
    be able to walk.'" -- Harry Browne

  27. Re:So for $30 I can get rid of my VAX-6000? by Rorschach1 · · Score: 1

    I was actually planning on getting this thing running, but the main problem with it is that it apparently requires 3-phase power. It was also on the second floor of a building, up three rather narrow flights of stairs, so getting it out required completely disassembling it. It's pretty much in one piece now, but I'm sure some of the internals need to be reconnected properly.

    The main unit is about the size of a wide refrigerator, and the storage array (an SA-850) is the size of a regular 19" rack.

    I like old hardware, but I really don't have the time to devote to it right now (or the 3-phase power) so I've been thinking about selling off all the boards and junking or giving away most of the rest. The guts are worth at least a few hundred bucks on the surplus market, so I'd rather not just give it all away, but on the other hand it's taking up a lot of room and it's not doing me any good. Maybe I'll post a message on that list and see if anyone wants to buy or trade for it.

  28. Here's a link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
    Ok. I thought everybody had heard of this already: recycling is wasteful activity.

    Here is a reprint of the original New York Times Magazine article "Recycling is Garbage".

    Yes, recycling is good for some materials, but the idea that extensive recycling (which requires a whole new waste managment infrastructure!) will save the world is preposterous.

    1. Re:Here's a link by Maryck · · Score: 1

      Nobody has ever claimed that recycling will save the world; this is why it is the 3 Rs: Reduce, Reuse, and Recycle. But the fact is that it is a very important component. Recycling is important not only to keep down resource usage, but also to prevent certain toxic chemicals, etc from improperly reentering the environment. A common example with computers is lead in computer monitors. By recycling the monitor, you can not only reclaim reusable components, but you can also extract the lead and other hazardous materials so that they can safely be disposed of.

    2. Re:Here's a link by mjfgates · · Score: 1

      Recycling CHEAP materials, like cardboard and most plastics, is a bad idea because those things are so cheap that the cost of transporting and processing quickly adds up to more than the value of the material saved. However, expensive things like metals are well worth the cost of hauling them about. Electronics, even old electronics, are worth even more dollars per pound than squished aluminum cans; therefore, there is at least a reasonable business case for recycling them.

  29. Right... Lets dump it all on YOUR lawn then... by crovira · · Score: 2

    Recycling is about transporting hazardous crap to safe places.

    You don't want hazardous crap? Then you should stop buying it.

    How likely is that then?

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
  30. Re:Odd by Jeremi · · Score: 1

    I would personally like to see this $29.95 fee (or whatever the price eventually is) included in the price of new computers as a 'deposit'. When it comes time to recycle your old machine, you then get your deposit back. This would give people a cash incentive to recycle, rather than just dumping their machine in the trash.

    --


    I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
  31. Use of recycled materials in new computer parts? by karzan · · Score: 1

    It's great to have a programme to start recycling old computer parts. But what I'd really like to see is new computers and computer parts made at least partially from recycled goods. Everything from CD-ROMs to chips--is this plausible or even possible? Is there anyone doing this now?

  32. Re:-exactly-. by Slynkie'sEvilTwin · · Score: 1

    no, no, no. that's what electric eel farms are for.

  33. Re:trash afterthought by Shiva+Lingham · · Score: 2
    Before you blow all that heavy lucre, check this out. This is the government approved list of electronic equipment recyclers, by state. There aren't many, but I know that in the case of my business, we rid ourself of a roomful of broken monitors, dead printers, but no CPUs, for free via one of the providers on this list.

    We're talking 15-20 dead monitors, and 4 or 5 BIG out of warranty HP LaserJets, out of sight, out of mind. They either recycle and resell or dispose of it according to regulations. The provider normally charged $50/trip, but waived this in our case because we gave them a big box of cables and other useful stuff. Beats the hell out of $29.99 a CPU, and we were just happy to see it go.

  34. Re:huge problems with your justification by xmurf · · Score: 1

    Juice cartons take up half the landfill space occupied by the glass bottles they replaced; 12 plastic grocery bags fit in the space occupied by one paper bag.

    Yeah, BUT.. if a turtle eats a piece of paper, what do you think will happen to it?(nothing, unless it's sandpaper, or fly-catching paper). If that same turtle then goes and eats plastic, or styrofoam, it'll surely die. Sea turtles tend to eat plastic bags, because they think it's jellyfish. Then they choke to death. Not a nice way to go.

  35. recycling is big business by ddent · · Score: 1

    As someone else mentioned earlier, computer recycling is big business.

    What I haven't seen mentioned is that other things recycled are big business too. The example that springs to my mind is an incinerator in my area. Municipalities pay to have their garbage incinerated (its done extremely cleanly - next to zero emissions - less then a car, you can't even tell its there when your right next to it) and the heat energy from burning is converted into electricity, and sold, and also partially sold as steam to run a factory near by. They make millions every year, some of which (not too much) goes to the French company that manages it, and the rest is enough to fund the recycling program in the area. Innovative!

  36. Hey /. editors... by Derwen · · Score: 1

    Hey do I put my comments here, or do I wait for one of you to repost this story in an hour or two?

    --
    http://fsfeurope.org/
    1. Re:Hey /. editors... by l33t+j03 · · Score: 2
      I address this in Question #4 of the FAQ:

      Question #4: I run a popular geek web forum. How can I increase my page impressions? My bosses have been pressuring me for more ad revenue. - Mr. Taco
      Answer: The best way to get people to post a lot is to appeal to their emotions. Since this is the domain of geeks you should try to pit two types of geekware that accomplish pretty much the same thing against one another. Like KDE vs. Gnome. That way, people will get really pissed off and feel like they have to voice their opinion. A little FUD never hurt things either. Try to get a topic like 'Your Rights Online' to convince people that their little hobby might be in danger. Be sure to sensationalize whenever possible. If you are having a particularly slow day you can always post the same story twice, just be sure to change the words around a little so you can defend yourself in the event someone notices. Maybe try posting a lot of vaporware article. People love to debate on whether or not some figment of some guy's imagination will ever make it to the market. Too bad you are running a geek site, if you could find a way to work politics in there you'd be sitting on a gold mine.

  37. Re:Not only that... by Krimsen · · Score: 1

    Oh crap, I just noticed that I've been posting everything witha +1 bonus point. Oh crap, my karma's going to feel this....

  38. Recycling wastes even more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
    The funny thing about recycling is that it actually pollutes the environment more than the old fashioned "let's dump everything in the same hole" kind of waste management.

    Sorting, transporting and handling several kinds of wastes instead of just one results in higher fuel and manufacturing consumption and thereby pollution.

    1. Re:Recycling wastes even more by Ralph+Wiggam · · Score: 1

      I'm sure the people who lived in Love Canal will agree with you.

      -B

    2. Re:Recycling wastes even more by Derwen · · Score: 1
      Sorting, transporting and handling several kinds of wastes instead of just one results in higher fuel and manufacturing consumption and thereby pollution.

      Ah, but fuel/ energy use doesn't have to mean pollution . As well as renewable sources of electricity for plant (factory machinery), vehicle engines can be powered by biodiesel, alcahol or other such annually renewable resources.
      However energy saving measures could drastically reduce the amount of energy we are using now and in the future.

      Anyway you are talking garbage (ouch, bad pun). Recycling uses far less energy than manufacturing from raw materials, never mind the cost of clearing up pollutants if something is simply thrown away.

      --
      http://fsfeurope.org/
    3. Re:Recycling wastes even more by LHOOQtius_ov_Borg · · Score: 5

      This argument is not based on fact. A good friend of mine was involved in the management of a sizable recycling company in the Bay Area for many years, and they not only helped keep many tons of electronic and metal scrap out of landfill, but they did it at a profit. Yes, that's right, a profit on recycling.

      In fact, IBM will likely make a profit on this deal. You PAY them $29.99 for recycling AND they get to sell or reuse the parts? Hey, I'll give you THAT deal! First of all, most solid state parts don't go bad very easily, so there is plenty for them to recover. Secondly, reselling used computers in third world countries can be fairly lucrative.

      The company my friend helped run did both of these things, plus metal recovery (which was actually their first business - recovery of gold from electronics assemblies to make jewelry). As with junked cars, the parts value can exceed the value of the assembled system once a certain age is past. However, if the system still works, it may be cheaper to just sell it used rather than expend the energy and time to disassemble it. Thus, this company, and presumably IBM, would dismantle the broken systems for parts or to recover precious metals, and sell the working ones overseas.

      My friend's company did this in, if I recall correctly, Indonesia and the Phillipines. Regarding environmental issues. For second-hand resale, the energy and pollution in transport did NOT outweigh the manufacture and transport of new systems (the transport expenditure is basically the same, but you're manufacturing new stuff as well, so how could new be cheaper costwise or environmentally?) For scrapping, the way that the components parts business is set-up, there is already a lot of transport going on, so this was also actually cheaper on both counts. As for metal recovery: not digging new mines, or, worse for an over-mined commodity like gold, lots of test mines and horrible things like sifter mines, gave quite a financial and environmental benefit.

      Recycling of many items, especially complex machines, is not only environmentally sound, but can be quite lucrative. IBM is really quite brilliant for doing this, especially since, being IBM, they can do it with minimal additional transport costs?

      Why? Most recycling moves through recycling centers. If IBM puts these at their distribution centers, to move the recycled equipment, you're mostly moving it in trucks which otherwise would be returning empty from distribution centers. In terms of home users shipping back via UPS, the financial cost is a little greater, but not really the environmental: again, you're primarily using empty space. Most UPS (and FedEx, and whatever) trucks return mostly empty to their depots. Someone else I knew well wrote the truck routing software for a major "less than truckload" shipper: their business is to resell the empty space on trucks. By making use of "waste" services to move waste goods, you're so far doing quite well financially and environmentally.

      The disassembly process is also almost never more expensive or environmentally damaging than manufacturing, and certainly resale of used systems is pretty obviously without any added environmental cost.

      If you know anything about the businesses of recycling and shipping, you realize that IBM has made a really smart move: if they know how to manage all this stuff properly (or if they partnered with folks who do), they'll make a profit AND get the PR bonus of being an "environmentally friendly" company.

      Kudos to IBM...

      --
      o/~ we are pissed, we are pissed, we have to resist... o/~ - ec8or
    4. Re:Recycling wastes even more by knurr · · Score: 1

      Well at least someone is trying to do something to help. If we do nothing then? what. If people keep trying new things to reduce the already huge amount of waste we produce, I will have their back...

      --
      If we refuse to be flexible, we are in effect opting out of the game of life. The world moves on without us.
    5. Re:Recycling wastes even more by truthsearch · · Score: 1

      You obviously aren't from New York City. A large part of the fleet of garbage trucks run on natural gas. The 2 landfills are in Staten Island, and they are the largest landfills in the continent. One of them is the highest point above sea level on the east coast. The landfills produce enough methane gas to supply every public school in the city with gas for science labs. Manufacturing consumption is cut by re-using old parts, and by charities not having to buy new computers when they can get re-used ones for free.

    6. Re:Recycling wastes even more by Saan · · Score: 1

      Donate to WWW.FREEBOXEN.COM and you won't be paying a penny.

    7. Re:Recycling wastes even more by nycdewd · · Score: 1

      eeejit, ya dig? i KNEW ya could. sheesh.

    8. Re:Recycling wastes even more by daveboy2099 · · Score: 1

      A very imfomative response, though I have a small correction regarding the shipping issues. I used to work for UPS and I can't imagine FedEx being that much different. Most UPS trucks and vans return to the hubs fairly full. The OTR trucks are almost never empty and the smaller trucks are not empty very often. Both companies are very efficient when it comes to utilizing the storage space on their vehicles. However, other shipping companies do tend to return to their warehouses fairly empty. UPS and FedEx do not.

    9. Re:Recycling wastes even more by Mike1024 · · Score: 1
      Hey,

      Sorting, transporting and handling several kinds of wastes instead of just one results in higher fuel and manufacturing consumption and thereby pollution.

      Sure! Them recycling lorrys use up far more fuel than normal refuse collection vechicles!

      Michael

      ...another comment from Michael Tandy.

      --
      "Goodness me, how unlike the FBI to abuse the trust of the American public." -- The Onion
  39. Re:This is great! by xmlmaster · · Score: 1

    Where are you located? If you're in the Pacific Northwest (USA), I'd be happy to help thin out your collection.

  40. I recycle Pentium class and better for FREE by Lumpy · · Score: 1

    Hey, why give them money when you can send it to me, postage paid, and I'l recycle it for free.

    Your hard drive will get wiped, and your ram/mobo/monitor and cards will be re-sold in my store.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  41. Sounds like the EPA rules need to change. by Taufiq · · Score: 1
    When was the EPA elected King?

    The EPA decides what a safe site is, and the EPA decides how much to charge to clean it up? Does anyone else see something wrong with this picture?

  42. I'm gonna undercut IBM, by brad3378 · · Score: 1

    &lt Sarcasm &gt
    .... By going to computer shows and have vendors pay me $25 to take possession of their outdated computers.

    Surely they can't expect me to actually pay them!

    &lt /Sarcasm &gt

    --

  43. The true motive behind IBM's generosity divined by embobo · · Score: 2

    There are going to build the world's largest Beowolf cluster. Imagine a 286 topping the SPEChpc results!

  44. Re:Reuse is pretty unlikely. by LHOOQtius_ov_Borg · · Score: 2

    You're just guessing... I am stating this from the past experience of at least one company operating in the SF Bay area. Even in teh US, some "obsolete" chips are more popular with hobbyists than the new ones - this company sold those over the counter to locals. The overseas operations disassembled boards, reclaimed useful parts (they defined useful according to their local markets), and extracted metal from the rest. The scrap plastic, I don't know what happened to it. Either landfill, or as road filler, would be my guess.

    Some third world countries, like Brazil, where I am at this very moment in my company's Brazilian engineering office, where we have many excellent engineers, actually DO have legions of trained repair techs, and programmers, etc. India is another third world country that shares this trait, as is Russia. Of course, they also have lots of poor people, but a depressed economy is not isomorphic with everyone being technologically backwards and uneducated...

    Unless you've actually left the US, and actually been involved with the computer recycling business, you are just making things up...

    Regarding the other guy's note about UPS and FedEx trucks... I will assume he is right, though I know that the UPS truck that delivers in the industrial neighborhood in Brooklyn that I live in often returns empty, I will assume this route is an exception in the UPS system. Other shipping companies DO seem, however, to have lots of extra space - as some companies make a living pooling it and reselling it.

    --
    o/~ we are pissed, we are pissed, we have to resist... o/~ - ec8or
  45. Big [Blue | Green]? by Derwen · · Score: 1
    The fact is that eventually something like this is going to become mandated due to environmental and resource concerns. Once that happens, the recycling and disposal costs will be built into the purchase cost.

    Quite right. According to this register article, European legislation will soon demand that manufacturers fund recycling schemes and passing the cost directly to the consumer when they purchase a new PC may be the only way to do it.

    Of course as IBM are putting hundreds of millions of bucks into Linux, does anyone mind them getting tax breaks on recycling?

    --
    http://fsfeurope.org/
  46. Re:huge problems with your justification by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Dumbass. We're talking about landfills vs recycling, not throwing shit in the fucking ocean. How many sea turtles do you think are crawling around in the middle of a landfill?

  47. GREAT DEAL... by SUWAIN · · Score: 1
    ... for IBM. They get about $30 and and old computer. Yes, it sounds like I'm kidding, but seriously - you pay them to take your computer and decide if they should refurbish (read: fix up and sell) again, making money off of something you paid them to take). Umm, what's up with this? Maybe if they paid you $29.99 it would be different. But this is outrageous!!

    ...............
    SUWAIN: Slashdot User Without An Interesting Name

    --

    ...............
    SUWAIN: Slashdot User Without An Interesting Name

  48. hey Anne! found this on trolltalk! by MOMOCROME · · Score: 1

    Does it apply? at least this post isn't as gummy as your shlock on kurosion!

    YOU ARE NOT YOUR KARMA, OR HOW MANY STORIES YOU'VE HAD POSTED TO THE FRONT PAGE. YOU ARE NOT YOUR LINUX BOX UPTIME. YOU'RE NOT YOUR FUCKING PALMPILOT. YOU ARE THE ALL SINGING, ALL DANCING CRAP OF SLASHDOT

    It was sad when Taco felt the need to run vlad out of town. It was sad when he wanted to mess with signal 11 as well, only he should've comported himself with a modicum of dignity the way vlad did, don't you think?

    btw, I would've thought jsm was a good choice too. too bad about the way it's been working out!

    -=(V)0(V)0cr0(V)3=-

  49. Computer recycling by Hugh+D.+Hyatt · · Score: 5

    Here are a few facts I dug up:

    • Something like 150 computers become obsolete every minute.
    • A typical 60-pound computer contains 35 pounds of currently unrecyclable substances of varying toxicity.
    • More than a tenth of those 35 pounds are typically of lead.
    • Lead attacks the nervous system, blood system and kidneys in humans. It has a well-documented and deleterious effect on children's brain development.

    I've collected some information on computer recycling (the link to documentation of lead's effect on children's brains is bad; here is a better one).

    --
    Music washes away from the soul the dust of everyday life. -- Berthold Auerbach
    1. Re:Computer recycling by Aqualung · · Score: 2

      Lead attacks the nervous system, blood system and kidneys in humans. It has a well-documented and deleterious effect on children's brain development.

      So remember folks, Do not dispose of old computer equipment by feeding it to children!

      ----
      Dave
      MicrosoftME®? No, Microsoft YOU, buddy! - my boss

      --

      - Dave
  50. incinerators are not all that. by websensei · · Score: 1

    how about the toxicity of the ashes left over?

    it's some of the nastiest s*it on the planet.

    incinerators are about as innovative as microsoft.

    --

    La via sola al paradiso incommincia nel inferno
    1. Re:incinerators are not all that. by ddent · · Score: 1

      well, perhaps thats why they focused on the lower volume and clean air and not on that when they did a presentation a while ago... , truth in advertising !puke!

  51. Re:Astonishingly cruel! by Ralph+Wiggam · · Score: 1

    Hey, at least the kid in Auckerman's post got 72 megs of RAM. That's more than I have in my home machine and I have a good job.

    -B

  52. Re:Recycle Computer Parts? by beckett · · Score: 1

    i would hate to see the clutter in your room.

  53. Re:Why do you want to keep the poor down? by SecurityGuy · · Score: 1
    I have a severe problem with people pawning off their old computers on the poor and needy and feeling that they have done something good. You aren't, you're keeping the poor down.

    We need a government program to get Windows 2000 compatible computers into the ghettos...

    I have a severe problem with people confiscating the product of others' hard work, giving it away, and thinking they've done something good. In a way, perhaps you have. The recipient of your...act might benefit, at least to the degree that they legally received free stuff, but you've also perpetrated a theft. Government has no business (or legal authority in the US) being a charitable institution, nor should it engage in income redistribution.

    I have a severe problem with the belief that technology is the cure for all things. Give 100 people a computer and some might go into IT. Come on, most people I know who have computers are not in IT. Most will play games. What about cars? Not having a car is a disadvantage, and a much greater one than not having a PC. Should we give everyone a car? A phone? Do they need ISDN/DSL/cable modem to go with that PC? Where do you draw the line, and why in the world would you opt to "give" (quotes, because you can't give that which isn't yours) PCs to the poor when there are more pressing needs? I'd much rather have food on the table, a phone for emergencies, clothes for the kids, etc. If and when finances tighten, you'd better believe I'd sell my PC to pay for food, clothes, rent, etc. If I was poor now and you gave me a PC I'd putting an ad in the newspaper tomorrow.

    I have a severe problem with the liberal mindset which calls for a government program for every need and want, but doesn't call for any personal charity at all. If you want to help someone, then do it! There's a local group which takes private donations to put together computer labs to teach IT skills to kids who otherwise wouldn't have the opportunity. I have tremendous respect for people who do this, as they're taking their own resources to help someone else. Calling for a government program to spend someone else's money is hollow and empty in comparison.

    I have a severe problem with keeping the poor down by giving them everything and depriving them of the will to make a better life for themselves. If you want to help them, insure that there are no barriers to them working for that Win2K PC if they want it, or that nice house, or nice car, or whatever.

    I take exception to this exactly because I've reached my position because I grew up wanting more than I had, and was taught that the way to get it is to work for it. I don't want to inflict the converse, the belief that the way to get what you want is to act helpless and lobby for government programs, on today's poor. That's a way to keep them down if ever there was one.

    Do you really believe the poor and needy are poor and needy only for lack of a PC? I have a close relative who is very like me in aptitude, who makes approximately minimum wage in two part time jobs (no benes). He's had PCs since he was about 10, and often better ones than I. He could quite easily have followed the same path I did, but chose not to. Giveaway programs, government sponsored or otherwise, won't help here. If you want to help, get personally involved. It comes down to motivation, and you can't motivate someone by giving them a PC of any vintage.

  54. Other Disposal by OctaneZ · · Score: 1

    While not nearly as environmental friendly, there are other amusing things to do with old wardware: http://www.massacre.org.uk/benchmarki ng. html

  55. Re:Why not Freeboxen? by Junks+Jerzey · · Score: 5

    I can see this as primarily a benefit to businesses...for individuals, why not just donate to Freeboxen? (www.freeboxen.com) Then you don't even need to pay the shipping...

    One of the great delusions of the consumer era is that donating is better than throwing out. It's true, to some extent, but you're making the assumption that people want your old crap. At the one extreme, you have mattress retailers who make you feel good by offering to donate your old mattress to charity. The result in many cases is that you have charities getting flooded with smelly, stained mattresses that they don't know what to do with and have to pay to have hauled away. A 286 may be of value, yes, but really what are most people going to do with it? You'd have to really dig to find software, and then you'd be out in the cold without manuals or support or anyone to turn to. Is it worth getting yourself reliant on software that's ten or more years old? Unfortunately, using old software and hardware is not so easy.

  56. I Second That, But . . . by tyronefine · · Score: 2
    But you have to keep in mind, that, as the story states, IBM assesses the equipment, and decides whether to donate or recycle it. For once at least, IBM is showing responsibility.

    On the other hand, though, I'd like to see IBM's criteria for deciding what's junk. Maybe what IBM considers useless, and therefore, ready to be scrapped, could in fact still be utilized by the poor.

    There are millions of impoverished individuals in this nation who would like to be able to have computer equipment, even old stuff, but the current economic system restricts that. That is why we need to continue to give technology to the poor and needy. I hope the average slashdot denizen will keep this in mind before junking that old computer.

    I am,

    --

    I am,
    Fine

  57. Wait a minute.... by fataugie · · Score: 1

    I thought that was what Ebay was for.....selling shit you don't want anymore

    --

    WTF? Over?

  58. Finding local computer recyclers... by greg_barton · · Score: 1

    Is there a site I can go to to find a computer recycler in my area?

    1. Re:Finding local computer recyclers... by ricegeek · · Score: 1

      http://www.microweb.c om/ pepsite/Recycle/recycle_index.html. This is not the most updated directory, but most of the organizations listed should still be around.

  59. Re:This is great! by Electric+Angst · · Score: 1

    Unfortunantly, I'm here in Texas. Also, since I'm at a State facility (UT), we have to follow certain protocals with our abondoned hardware. (Or else we staff members would be rich selling four year old laserjets and film scanners who's drivers only work with Windows 3.1...)
    --

    --
    Feminism is the wild notion that women are human beings.
  60. RE: This is an IBM plot to ruin Linux by l33t+j03 · · Score: 1
    You could wait for SMP support.

    HA! I am on a roll today.

  61. Re:Odd by Lxy · · Score: 2

    The /. headline made it confusing, but the press release made sense. You pay $29.99 and UPS will come to your door to take your old computer crap, working or not. In this way you're assured that the $30 you spend will help your deceased hardware find its way into proper recycling facilities and your old working crap finds it way into the hands of needy children.

    The concept makes sense, I just would never justify the cost of shipping off my old crap as opposed to dropping it in the dumpster behind Computer Renassaince (as I have many a time) or giving it to the young kernel hackers in my LUG.

    "You'll die up there son, just like I did!" - Abe Simpson

    --

    There is no reasonable defense against an idiot with an agenda
    :wq
  62. Re:Why not Freeboxen? by pruss · · Score: 2

    One can probably still find all the software one needs free on simtel20's DOS section. Most of it wil run on an 8088, and certainly on a 286. And, yes, there is plenty of good stuff one can do on a 286. E.g., the best technical typesetting system, namely TeX, ran just fine on an 8 MHz 8086 (I know because I wrote my thesis on one) and it's freely available. And if all one wants is email, one can use a DOS-based TCP/IP stack and telnet. Or just a terminal emulator and a shell account (I'm sending this email from a 9.5 MHz Z80 machine with 128K SRAM).

  63. Don't forget the cost of parts by WarSpiteX · · Score: 1

    There are many valuable metals and alloys in a computer. Anything from small quantities of platinum and silver to stainless steel. Finally, there are many re-usable parts in PCs. Sound card dead? Maybe, but not necessarily the amp or the connectors. The PCB can be recycled if you take off the chips, etc. And you're PAYING for this. I remember a CNN report about a company in Switzerland that did this for free and made about $100 off every computer dropped off.

    --


    I'm a little segfault, short and stout.
  64. Re:Recycle Computer Parts? by aufecht · · Score: 1

    Couldn't have said it better. My closet is full of old PCs, Macs, laptops, modems, monitors, etc. I am determined to find a use for them someday, maybe a sculpture made out of old PCs would be cool.

  65. Re:Above is a goatse.cx link AM TOO! by bitMonster · · Score: 1

    127.0.0.1 localhost goatse.cx

  66. Why Pay Money? by NatePWIII · · Score: 1

    Your right, why pay $30 dollars for something that should really be free. Here in Utah, we have a good system going with the Deseret Industries Thrift Stores. You can drop off any of your old PC equipment for absolutely nothing and the parts are either resold on the shelves for excellent prices or refurbished or recycled. IBM's little program won't go anywhere I would guess. People hate to pay their hard earned money to these large corporations for a service that already exists.

    Nathaniel P. Wilkerson
    Domain Names for $13

    --

    Nathaniel P. Wilkerson
    www.haidacarver.com
  67. Any recyclers in Los Angeles area? by antdude · · Score: 2

    Are there any around here? How about City of Industry since I live about 10 minutes away?

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  68. Re:Corporate "green" or "greed"? by slashdoter · · Score: 1
    Usually, Envirocycle is instructed to destroy those chips, but just think how little it would cost for a competitor to buy (or even just steal) those chips out from under their own competitors' noses

    This may be so but the chips are going to be more than 3 years old! It would be faster just to buy the one at the store.

    ________

    --
    Does anyone actually have a Java program designed to control air traffic, or for the operation of a nuclear facility?
  69. Re:Uhm, you mean I have to pay? by Mathieu+Lu · · Score: 1

    > To throw my ancient PC out? I don't think so. That's what the dumpster behind Safeway is for.

    Oh yeah, that environment thing.. what a bitch.. it's way better to dump stuff and fix the problem a few generations later when the problem really gets critical (kind of like Windows NT :)

  70. -exactly-. by Slynkie'sEvilTwin · · Score: 1

    I was just thinking that while scrollin' through these messages. In all my years of computing (~15 or so), i've only thrown away one computer (an apple IIC!!), and i regret that i don't have it now. I keep all my old equipment, from monitors to [234]86s to 1mb memory sticks.

    Worse comes to worse, there's always some little elementary school lab or small business that could use a cheap firewall.

    now -that's- recycling.

  71. Good idea, But.... by tarsi210 · · Score: 4

    From the: Make-your-neighbor-child-giddy dept.

    Good idea if your parts are broken. However, if they're not, consider donating or selling them to someone who wants them. There are TONS of computer collectors out there that would LOVE to take computers off your hands for the cost of shipping, provided they work. The older, the better. There's several Computer Shelters [1] [2] and other "low end" computer sites [3] that have hobbyists just searching for parts and machines. There are listservs, Vintage Computer Organizations and, of course, the effervescent Obsolete Computer Museum site.

    If nothing else, please forward messages of machines available for pickup or shipping to: computershelter@computershelter.org and I'll be happy to pass them on to hobbyists who would love to take them off your hands. Some of use the computers for our collections and to learn about older technologies, some of us clean them up and give them to children and impovershed families in our area to give them a piece of technology.

    If it's broken, dispose of properly. But if it isn't, please donate and keep them in use!

    1. Re:Good idea, But.... by tarsi210 · · Score: 1

      A clarification of the above...

      When I said, "for the cost of shipping" I meant that hobbyists will often gladly pay the shipping if you will donate the parts for free to them. I didn't mean to imply that they would require the business to pay the shipping.

  72. What a waste by Derwen · · Score: 2
    Here is a reprint of the original New York Times Magazine article "Recycling is Garbage".

    Ok, enough is enough . I've just wasted some minutes on the distortions and half-truths of the article, here is one example:

    We're a wicked throwaway society. Plastic packaging and fast-food containers may seem wasteful, but they actually save resources and reduce trash. The typical household in Mexico City buys fewer packaged goods than an American household, but it produces one-third more garbage, chiefly because Mexicans buy fresh foods in bulk and throw away large portions that are unused, spoiled or stale. Those apples in Dittersdorf's slide, protected by plastic wrap and foam, are less likely to spoil. The lightweight plastic packaging requires much less energy to manufacture and transport than traditional alternatives like cardboard or paper. Food companies have switched to plastic packaging because they make money by using resources efficiently. A typical McDonald's discards less than two ounces of garbage for each customer served -- less than what's generated by a typical meal at home.

    Spoiled, stale or unused food (or any organic waste) is not garbage, it's potential fertilizer. To even talk of putting it in a landfill is madness. Whilst *some* packaging can be recycled - with some energy cost. Organic matter recycles itself! Just stack it up and wait a few weeks and you have compost.
    Now can we get back to talking about computer parts?

    --
    http://fsfeurope.org/
  73. Re:Good use for lead by SquadBoy · · Score: 1

    I think my children have been doing this. It would explain alot about them. :)

    --

    Cypherpunks: Civil Liberty Through Complex Mathematics. Those who live by the sword die by the arrow.
  74. Re:Not only that... by plover · · Score: 2
    That's fine. Their stockholders seriously don't want or care about "noble" reasons. They only want profits. A corporation can't do anything without considering the bottom line. This is a huge win for IBM IIF consumers go for it.

    I've got enuf old junk laying around that I'm considering shipping them a bunch. I hope that they'll not notice if the machine has four old MOBOs stacked up inside it... :-)

    John

    --
    John
  75. Re:trash afterthought by knurr · · Score: 1

    looking around my office we have been trying to come up with ways to reduce our old PC numbers, and looking at IBM's offer , what they are doing is cheaper than our method of just trying to figure it all out. So I feel when one looks at an option like this they have to figure out what is cost effetive for them. For us this would be Cost effective and I have emailed the story to my boss. I feel this may be a buisness to buisness aplication than anything.

    --
    If we refuse to be flexible, we are in effect opting out of the game of life. The world moves on without us.
  76. Re:Odd by Derwen · · Score: 1
    I'm not sure if I understand. Will IBM pay you $30 or do you play IBM $30 to recycle your computer? It's actually unclear in the press release.

    From the site: "for $29.99, which includes shipping. Customers will be able to box the system and ship it via UPS to Envirocycle -- a designated recycling center."
    That sounds like you are making the payment to cover their shipping (& other) costs. It's a good scheme (as are the smaller ones mentioned by other posters), but are they only doing it in the US?

    --
    http://fsfeurope.org/
  77. Re:This is great! by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 2

    My company throws away tons of good computer equipment every so often...a bunch of P166 and P200 systems, ATI Rage Pro video cards, 72 pin RAM, 2+ gig HD's. These things make great home computers if all you do is go on the net and play some low-powered games like Sim City. I can't count how many systems (or "orphans") I've saved from the trash pile and have taken home.

    I even made an MP3 juke box out of some old parts and took it back to work for my listening pleasure! The specs are at www.betips.net/emp3box. I'm listed as the first news article for November. All of those delicious parts I used (except for the Compaq handheld, which was mine) were about to be thrown out by the cleaning crew.

  78. How? by Senior+Frac · · Score: 1

    I went to the website and read a very nice press release. Yet it gives no information on how to get started. Whom do I contact? Stupid marketers.

    --

  79. Re:GOLD! by HiyaPower · · Score: 2

    This indeed was being done when the price of gold was high enough. Alas, with the price of gold down at $260/troy, this has lost a great amount of whatever allure it had. Unfortunately, recycling metals like gold involves some rather nasty chemicals (cyanides in some cases, e.g. heap leatching is get a pile of gold ore and pore cyanide on it), and is cost prohibitive when the price is too low. Silver from fixer can be recovered by electolysis from photographic fixer (sodium theosulphate for the most part), but you already have the silver in solution. Silver is more reactive than gold by a far shot.

  80. Corporate "green" or "greed"? by Anne+Marie · · Score: 3

    It's good that someone is doing something to help keep our planet clean, but you also have to understand the economics behind IBM's move here. Companies like Micro Metallics have been extracting gold and other precious metals from discarded computers for many years now: with yields of as much as 20oz/ton, compared to 1oz/ton of ore from a typical gold mine. For $20, you're basically purchasing the "right" to have IBM make money off your valuable commodities. It's one thing to make a cash-for-service exchange, but it's an entirely different thing to make a cash-for-service-which-makes-cash exchange.

    And don't forget Envirocycle's role in this operation. Besides being on their way to a solid monopoly in the computers-recycling industry, they pose a serious unrecognized risk of corporate espionage. As this Science News article pointed out as far back as 1995, in the course of recycling proprietary circuit boards and chips, Envirocycle is being given privileged access to industry leaders' intellectual property. Usually, Envirocycle is instructed to destroy those chips, but just think how little it would cost for a competitor to buy (or even just steal) those chips out from under their own competitors' noses.

    Recycling is ultimately a good thing, but there need to be strong industry-ethics standards in place to assure that in saving the environment, we don't give up important rights and privileges. I'm wary that this industry (like so many others) cannot be expected to regulate its own behavior, but the solution is left as an exercise to the reader.

    --
    -- Anne Marie
  81. Yes Yes Yes by Pru · · Score: 2

    Yes IBM is doing this to help it self out, As all large companys do. Weither or not this will make them a profit. It will help their image. And rember hell why cant they do some good at the same time.

  82. Re:Why not Freeboxen? by Peale · · Score: 1

    Freeboxen.com is not a place to donate your computer to. It's a forum so you can post your unwanted hardware in hopes that someone else will want it. Generally the interested party will have to pay shipping on it. Some people even refuse to ship, asking instead for a personal pick-up.

  83. Re:This seems most useful for borken old hardware. by garcia · · Score: 1

    I prefer option 4.. Sell it on Ebay, let them know it is dying/dead, and they will still buy it from you and PAY for shipping..

  84. Another incentive for businesses. by Isomer · · Score: 1

    One thing which I've not seen mentioned is the
    incentive for companies that sell computers (Such
    as IBM) in such a recycling effort. This gets
    older computers off the streets so they can put
    newer computers out there. Even if you only need
    a 486 to run your DNS servers, if there aren't enough
    computers you may need to go out and buy something
    more grunty and generate them more $$$ :)

  85. Re:Astonishingly cruel! by MsGeek · · Score: 1
    Crucial has got crazy prices now on RAM. $88 for an 128MB 100MHz ECC DIMM. Get as much RAM as you can cram NOW...no telling how long this deal will last.

    And I bought one a couple of weeks ago for $119...*sigh*.


    ---- Hey Grrl Geeks! Your very own geek news site has arrived!

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
  86. Re:Simple by yetisalmon · · Score: 2

    Why would businesses pay to have their computers recycled?

  87. Other ideas by afinlay · · Score: 1

    Other ideas rather than paying someone else to take the machine off your hands would be to (if you haven't already done this) run a firewall on it. You could use the box as a router, or use it to secure your network. Evaluating Linux distros on it is also another option to consider. This seems like a good end option for your computer, but if your computer still works, why not be resourceful?

  88. I think I can undercut them.. by sid_vicious · · Score: 1
    You pay me $20, and I'll throw your computer in the back of my pickup and dump it off at the landfill in the middle of the night.

    Ah, capitalism at work..

    :)

    --
    If it ain't broke, it doesn't have enough features yet.
  89. Re:Recycling by tsangc · · Score: 1
    Only when the machine or parts are not repairable should they be taken down into raw materials.

    I doubt the problem is finding someone to take it, the problem is getting it there. Tons and tons of produce are left to rot because shipping it would just be too expensive.

    Calum

  90. $30 for _old_ computers?! by Jose · · Score: 1

    Heck....I'll pay anyone one of you $30 (canadian) for _new_ computers!!

    (heh..what a bad joke)

    --
    The basic sleazeware produced in a drunken fury by a bunch of UCBerkeley grad students was still the core of BIND. --PV
  91. Re:Why not Freeboxen? by istartedi · · Score: 2

    Because we're sick and tired of hearing people say "boxen".

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  92. Reuse is pretty unlikely. by Tau+Zero · · Score: 1
    In fact, IBM will likely make a profit on this deal. You PAY them $29.99 for recycling AND they get to sell or reuse theparts? Hey, I'll give you THAT deal! First of all, most solid state parts don't go bad very easily, so there is plenty for them to recover. Secondly, reselling used computers in third world countries can be fairly lucrative.
    Unlikely on two counts.
    1. Obsolete parts at the board/subassembly level, modems, slow/tiny RAM, and other parts are practically worthless because you can buy more reliable stuff new for very little already.
    2. Obsolete chips are almost completely worthless, because you can't even unsolder them without a lot of labor and stress on the part. You might be able to incorporate the chip into something else if you're lucky, but the result will be nowhere near as reliable as the first unit.
    I doubt that third-world countries have the legion of trained repair techs it would take to keep recycled and/or obsolete-repaired computers running, and that's before you consider the impact of obsolete interfaces for devices like disk drives.
    --
    --
    Time is Nature's way of keeping everything from happening at once... the bitch.
  93. Tycoons by gibbonboy · · Score: 1

    Seems like everyone would like to accept some money to take away old computers, but what would all these future recycling tycoons do with all the broken parts? Envirocycle and companies like them are not non-profits, therefore, since they've made the investment in employees and large facilities, and pay all their licensing and inspection fees, they have earned any profit they make. It's a great way to make money, so be happy for them instead of trying to make them sound like "evil capitalist pigs". Geez! Everything ain't gonna be free.

    --
    "Never pet a burning dog."
    1. Re:Tycoons by ekfinn · · Score: 2

      You're right, Envirocycle is just a warehouse full of CRTs on crats with a cracked concrete floor and a stagnant smell in the air... how do I know? I worked for MATCO this summer as a test engineer for U.S. Assemblies, Hallstead. Matco owns several U.S. Assemblies plants (PCB assembly), a board company, and Envirocycle... Envirocycle happened to be the bottom floor of the warehouse... oh yeah, they also have a pretty nice machine shop.

  94. give me $10 and I will take your old computer by jbischof · · Score: 1

    Althought this seems like a good idea in my eyes it is too much money to give away something I paid $1000 for. My questions is why hasnt the low cost pc market taken off. I heard a lot of talk about as computers get faster, the slower ones will be cheaper. Nobody makes software for slow computers anymore, and nobody (or at least not a lot of people) sell cheap computers. Why not give a school a crap load of pentiums or old x86's and if they had decent software then that would be a great solution to the current problem of technology costing the user so much. I guess we will just have to wait until moore's law breaks down then the computer prices for latest technology should drop (along with the tech stock market)

    1. Re:give me $10 and I will take your old computer by travisd · · Score: 1

      Schools are getting picky. Most won't accept non-working hardware, and many won't accept less than a devent Pentium-class machine. 486's aren't going to fly -- they have to dispose of them too, rememeber?

  95. This seems most useful for borken old hardware... by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 3

    I've got an HP fixed-frequency display attached to my Win98 box at home, that the degaussing circuitry is finally going bad on. (Considering that the display was built 8 years ago and that for the past year I've been driving it at a frequency it technically doesn't support, I think I've been pretty lucky.)

    So now I have 70 lbs of useless lead, glass, and plastic sitting there. What should I do with it?

    1) Keep it on the floor in my apartment forever
    2) Break out the soldering iron and sci.electronics.repair FAQ's, and hope I don't end up with glass shards sticking out of me
    3) For $30, IBM will take care of everything.

    Maybe I'm crazy, but option number 3 looks pretty appealing...

  96. Not only that... by Krimsen · · Score: 3

    Not only that, but basically IBM gets to clean up some hazardous waste (which I possibly gets them some sort of tax break) and on top of that, they get to dontate your old hardware and I am pretty sure they get a tax break for that. Sorry to sound cynical... They are still getting something good done, but I just don't believe their reasons are totally noble.

    1. Re:Not only that... by Derwen · · Score: 1
      They are still getting something good done, but I just don't believe their reasons are totally noble.

      Hey, does it matter why they are doing it?
      I expect the people involved along the way to enacting this policy ranged from noble idealists who wanted to reduce our heavy footprint upon the earth to cold-blooded marketroids who saw good PR. Any corporation is made up of a range of individuals. The point is that they are doing it.

      --
      http://fsfeurope.org/
    2. Re:Not only that... by ichimunki · · Score: 2

      Not to be all contrary and picky, but the idea that stockholders of corporations care only about money is dangerous. Sadly, most American stockholders are greedy and couldn't possibly understand investing in corporations except for the purpose of making money (this has more to do with the real values of most Americans than it has to do with any inherent characteristic of capitalism). But it doesn't have to be this way. Shareholders are free to vote their shares for whatever goals or aims they have. It just so happens that most corporations and groups of shareholders are caught in this loop where the company sets its primary goal as making money for shareholders, and investors choose those companies because that is the primary goal. But these same people, in their daily lives, and these same companies, at tax time, freely give away large chunks of money to churches, the United Way, and numerous other charity organizations so that those organizations will do "good things". What they miss is the obvious opportunity for some of those "good things" to be done right at the company-- in this case, IBM appears to have caught on. The simple fact is that being environmentally responsible is often very profitable, because it takes to heart the old saying "a penny saved is a penny earned". There are entire mutual funds devoted to the issue of socially responsible or ecologically sound investing (so further shame should accrue to Mr. Nader for being so heavily invested in the Magellan fund, thereby owning shares indirectly in so many of the corporations he spent his campaign lambasting). Companies which take the concerns of the communities they serve to heart become companies which inspire customer loyalty. In this case, IBM is actually doing a good deed, and thereby reaping the reward of positive public opinion (and it doesn't hurt if they modeled this business in a way that has a solid revenue model). This is probably good for the bottom line. On the other hand, companies that make landmines, or sell infant formula to third world countries find themselves at the center of a very negative public debate, which even if it doesn't harm customer loyalty can only consume resources within the corporation to deal with the controversy. So, shareholders should demand more than just a decent return on investment-- they should demand that companies do the right thing. Which is often a win-win situation, since doing the right thing is often good business.

      --
      I do not have a signature
    3. Re:Not only that... by Krimsen · · Score: 2

      I guess it really doesn't matter why they are doing it... It's just sad to see that government must give some type of reward for behavior that we all should be exhibiting for our own good (and the good of future generations.)

  97. Re:Been done by rkent · · Score: 1

    Er, I think it's 2.5% anyway. It's been a long time since I've sold anything on ebay.

  98. Re:This is great! by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 2

    oh smeg....

    make that URL www.betips.net/mp3box

  99. Don't forget Freeboxen.com!!! by Krimsen · · Score: 2

    You could always put them up on freeboxen. I am sure people would pay to have some broken monitors to use for parts. and I would be most grateful for those Sun machines from the 80's... even if they are broken! Please, please, please!

    1. Re:Don't forget Freeboxen.com!!! by Krimsen · · Score: 2

      Oh yeah... the site is

    2. Re:Don't forget Freeboxen.com!!! by Krimsen · · Score: 2

      Dammit, I screwed up the tag. freeboxen.com

  100. OK... by toxic+cock · · Score: 1

    That's all well and good, but will they take my Commodore 64?!

    --
    - Toxic
  101. Why do you want to keep the poor down? by Hairy_Potter · · Score: 2

    There are millions of impoverished individuals in this nation who would like to be able to have computer equipment, even old stuff, but the current economic system restricts that. That is why we need to continue to give technology to the poor and needy. I hope the average slashdot denizen will keep this in mind before junking that old computer.

    I have a severe problem with people pawning off their old computers on the poor and needy and feeling that they have done something good.

    You aren't, you're keeping the poor down.

    Now, if you're computer is too old for you, is it benefiting the poor and needy to have it? Only if you want to keep them poor and needy.

    A good computer can be a big help in getting someone out of the ghetto, it can help them leapfrog themselves into a good, IT position. But will giving a ghetto kid a 386 with Windows 3.11 on it really help them? Is there a burning need for Windows 3.11 users?

    We need a government program to get Windows 2000 compatible computers into the ghettos, and help the poor and needy leapfrog their dire straits into good IT jobs. Giving them old computers won't do, and is the act of a closet racist. What next, giving the poor your old moldy food, your old dangerous lead paint, your old, unsafe car?

    1. Re:Why do you want to keep the poor down? by erinlee · · Score: 1
      An old computer is better than no computer. We're not talking about burgeoning IT developers here. We're talking about people who have no other access to computers, who need to learn the basics - even stuff as fundamental as how to use a mouse. These are becoming survival skills, and even a little computer literacy will go a long way. Surely you're not arguing that nothing is better than something?

      My home comp for years was largely cobbled out of my older brother's old cast-offs. I sure don't think I'd be better off now if I hadn't had it at all.

    2. Re:Why do you want to keep the poor down? by Throw+Away+Account · · Score: 1

      We're not talking about burgeoning IT developers here.

      And why not? Last I checked, Minix provided a Unix-like OS and C compiler for PCs with processors as old as the 8086/8088. Not what I'd use in a production environment, but certainly good enough to learn the basics of Unix administration and C programming.

      --
      There's no "we" in team, only "me"
    3. Re:Why do you want to keep the poor down? by kc7cfk · · Score: 1

      On the contrary, giving a kid an outdated PC is likely to have the exact opposite effect of what you are claiming. Think about it: what is more likely to produce incentive to climb out of the ghetto, a free taste of interesting but outdated technology, or a handout of the most current technology? How many of us got started in IT through having access to the best technology available? No doubt most of us got a taste of it through such activities as playing around with someone else's junk or even taking apart old clock radios just to see how they worked.

    4. Re:Why do you want to keep the poor down? by Auckerman · · Score: 2
      Now, if you're computer is too old for you, is it benefiting the poor and needy to have it? Only if you want to keep them poor and needy....We need a government program to get Windows 2000 compatible computers into the ghettos

      I take issue with this.

      1. I have personally seen a child (single mother, no health care, just off welfare) light up who I gave an old 6116CD PowerMac (601-60MhzPPC/72MB ram). I have also personally seen that same very child a year later install both LinuxPPC and MacOS 7.6 as a dual boot machine. He is now 11 years old and likes to hose his Linux Install by recompiling everything he can and tinkering with every config file he can find. Evenally, he will make a LOT of money doing that to make a computer work.

      2. The government should not dictate what Operating System should people use. It's already hard enough to find a usable competitor to Windows, we don't need it any harder.

      3. Even if the govt did have a vested interest in giving computers of a default OS to the poor, Win2000 is still nothing more than a niche OS compared to Win9X/ME, MacOS and in some markets Un*x based OS.

      --

      Burn Hollywood Burn
  102. Apply the concept of cans on it. by segmond · · Score: 2

    Do you recycle your dr pepper cans? I definitely do especially after accumlating a thousand at the end of each month. Why do I recycle? Not because I really really care about the environment, but because I had to pay extra for each can, and upon recycle I got them back. I think the same should be done for computer parts and batteries. Get charged extra, but you will be refunded upon return for recycle when you are done using it irrelevant of it is working or not. I throw away batteries pretty much every two weeks, and computer parts every month, if I could definitely get back any money, I do go the extra step to recycle.

    --
    ------ Curiosity killed the cat. {satisfaction brought it back | it didn't die ignorant | lack of it is killing mankind
  103. In a Related Story... by gvonk · · Score: 1

    I have offered to recycle your used vehicles for $29.99. Just drop them off at my house and leave the money on the front seat with the keys. Don't pay high prices to recycle your used car when you need to instead focus on buying a new one!!!

    --


    El Karma: excelente(principalmente la suma de moderación hecha a los comentarios de los usuarios)
  104. Re:Recycle Computer Parts? by Rocketboy · · Score: 2

    Dear Jesus, you sound like my daughter. The last time we moved I must have hauled four large heavy boxes full of antique computer trash out from under her bed. No way was I going to transport that crap for her so I threw it in the trash. I found out later that she got up in the middle of the night to retrieve and hide it, then moved it herself. Now I've got those same damn four boxes in the new house! Someone explain to me that value of four munged RLL 30 MB hard drives? Full height, too. Do you know what those things weigh?

    (Mommy's watching, dear. Ok, sport. Explain this: in your desk drawer I found a 20 MB MFM drive. You were saving it for what, again? And this Hercules monitor card from God knows when? How about that 386 motherboard [doggone it, it has 16MB of RAM on it! What else am I going to do with 16 30-pin 1MB SIMMS?] How about the dead TI 386 notebook? You resuscitated it twice: going for three, are we? Or the Tandy 1400 FD laptop? 'All it needs is a battery.' To do WHAT? Then there's the AT case behind the door. [They don't make 'em like that anymore: you could park a car on it and it wouldn't hurt it.] So park a car on it, laughing boy! I'm tired of tripping over it whenever I try to wrestle a load of laundry through the door. How about the carcass of that old Packard Bell 486? You didn't even bother trying to breathe new life into that one. [PB sucked. I keep its putrid remains around to remind me of how bad things could get.] Face it: the kid gets her packrat tendencies from you. I should have known to expect no better from someone who plugged a 5.25" floppy drive into his new PC. Remind me: just why did I marry you again? [That was an ID10T error, sweetie. But I love you anyway, even if you do use Windows.]

    :)

  105. Price of disposal should by Camel+Pilot · · Score: 1

    be part of the purchase price.

  106. Re:So for $30 I can get rid of my VAX-6000? by SlashDotIDOne · · Score: 1

    Well, if you have any smaller VAX systems I will take one off your hands for free, plus shipping?

    --
    "I regret that I have but one life to give for my country. I'd feel safer if I had two or three."
  107. Re:Simple by Eccles · · Score: 1

    Why would businesses pay to have their computers recycled?

    Read the story header again. If a business dumps machines straight in the trash, they may end liable for fines many times greater than $30 a machine. Moreover, facilities for doing this make it easier for governments to consider imposing even stricter controls requiring recycling.

    --
    Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
  108. Whatever by JurriAlt137n · · Score: 1

    A couple of people including myself have been doing this for quite a while already, since we live very close to a number of universities. People come to my place, dump their stuff, and go away again. Other people come to my place to ask if I've got anything for them. Since this usually concerns writing something in wordperfect a 286/386 is all they need. The only problemis that I don't have enough storage space for all those IDE/ESDI controllers :-( Anyway, I don't really see what's new about this.

    --

    People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
  109. Re:Why not Freeboxen? by jorbettis · · Score: 1

    I have a working Woz signature Apple ][gs that I got through similar circumstances.

    --

    Jordan Bettis

    ``Wherever you go, there's another stupid sigfile quote.''
  110. In general this is a Good Thing, but...... by gunslngr · · Score: 1

    There are some pretty big things to consider before calling IBM.

    First things first. I'm not sure what consumer waste means. If the author means consumer waste is stufff like office products or equipment, then yeah, in the office or business situation, consumer waste is not exempt.

    But if the author means household waste, (waste generated in private households and the like), then the waste is specifically exempted from being a hazardous waste in most states (reg. cite 40 CFR 261.4(b)).

    That means if the waste was generated at home, it ain't hazardous, but the same material generated in a business could be hazardous. This is pretty complex stuff, so ask a regulator or a consultant like me.

    As for the actual IBM service: On the surface, this looks pretty appealing. Most businesses, unless they are considered "conditional exempt" need to think things through very carefully before using a service like this. It turns out that if IBM screws up, then you, not IBM bears a big chunk of the liability.

    Additionally, if your business is governed by RCRA, then you may be getting yourself into the scrap metal and recycling rules of 40 CFR. These things are pretty scary. In short, talk to you regualtory agency before using this kind of service. Even the way you internally manage the old computers can change what is okay and not okay to send off site for recycling. Just ask AT&T -- They were recently popped 190K for not providing the right answers to EPA region 2.

    What does this all mean? 1) This could be a good way to get rid of your old computers and parts, but (to be safe) look to charities that won't be scrapping or reclaiming materials from your old equipment. This will keep you away from the gray areas. 2) If you aren't sure your okay. Look in the regs. Ignorance does not reduce liability, and scrap and recycling are tough to work with under RCRA. 3)Computers, batteries, and parts are one of the uberheadaches of RCRA (second only to chemical weapons disposal -- this I know) so be careful, and talk to your regulator.

    Later,
    Fred b.
    compliance thug.

  111. Recycling batteries in Albuquerque, Europe, Brasil by ma2oliveira · · Score: 2

    I believe that batteries can be taken back to the stores for recycling in Europe only because the battery companies there are required by law to have a recycling structure in place. Perhaps the recycling of batteries results in less reclaimable material than recycling paper, plastic or aluminum parts.
    I believe that in the USA, that sort of legislation would be seen as restrictive and therefore may be difficult to approve.
    In Brasil, although battery recycling is mostly ignored in most regions (with exceptions mostly in the southern region), I have seen several recycling dumpsters with a specific bin for batteries. I am not sure what they actually do with them after collection. As for recycling other material, that process runs the gamut of modern recycling sites to poor who live off meager earnings from picking through trash landfills. Rather sad.
    I have tried to find places to recycle used batteries in Albuquerque, NM. Unfortunately, the recycling bins found at the Wild Oats grocery stores are only for paper and glass. Radio Shack was of no help.
    I, for one, would be interested in a list of places one could normally take the batteries to be recycled. Anyone?

  112. Simple by yetisalmon · · Score: 1

    Who's going to pay to get their computer recycled? No one.

  113. Re:Recycle Computer Parts? by substrate · · Score: 2
    I have a closet full of worthless 386's and a drawer of token ring nics. Old monitors make great fish tanks,
    I'm assuming that the insides of your monitor didn't become part of your fish tank, so they went someplace. The landfill is the wrong place.

    I guess I've always managed to hand down my old equipment (thus making it somebody elses problem) and I'm too lazy to deal with tax receipts or hassles from donating to charitable organizations.

  114. It's kind of disturbing actually... by macx666 · · Score: 1

    A friend works for a company that cannot just give away older computers to needy schools because of liability purposes, so instead they are practically forced to partake in a computer "recycling" program. What is so odd is that they must pay a fee to do this (it is massivly enterprise level, so this is not an insignificant fee), yet the recycling company takes salvagable components and turns around to sell them making a double profit.
    It seems like the company should see some of those secondary profits from the resale of components, or shouldn't get charged a fee at all.
    I suppose that is what people get for wanting to be nice and generous these days *sigh*...

    Mr. Macx

  115. The semi-official word from IBM (You pay them) by ka9dgx · · Score: 2
    I followed the links and wrote them a short email and asked. The reply came back quickly, (showing that IBM definitely has a clue) and unambigously...

    Hi. The consumer calls IBM or goes to IBM's web site and purchases the
    product take back for $29.99. The consumers pays. The consumer receives a
    kit with special label for UPS. The consumer packages the PC and takes it
    to UPS. UPS ships it to Envirocycle in Hallstead, Penna., for recycling or
    donation. Hope that helps. Best.

    So, I clipped the address lines off the bottom (because I didn't ask for permission to post, but it seems reasonable to quote them). This area of ettiquite is still up for grabs, IMHO.

    This seems like a reasonable sum to include shipping, and to find a good home (I hope) for all of the hardware that works, but I don't want to have to support if it breaks because I gave it to a person.

    Mike Warot, Hoosier

  116. Re:Odd by Maryck · · Score: 2

    The fact is that eventually something like this is going to become mandated due to environmental and resource concerns. Once that happens, the recycling and disposal costs will be built into the purchase cost. IBM is simply getting a jump on this by starting an independent program now. Since they cannot influence the purchase price, they need to charge a disposal fee.

    BTW, most cities already do charge a disposal fee for computers, TVs, etc since they qualify as hazardous waste. It might not be 30 dollars, but it is not something you can do for free.

  117. If IBM thinks... by ellem · · Score: 1

    ...they're getting my A500 they can drop dead. They can have my Epyx Joystick when they pry it from my dead fingers!

    --
    This .sig is fake but accurate.
  118. Re:Batteries need recycling too... --Belkin does by OmegaDan · · Score: 1

    Some companies are starting to take responsibility ... belkin has a program with all their UPS's where when your battery dies they'll recycle the old battery, give you a new one, and check out the UPS to make sure its working for like 40$.

  119. IBM's new product by arcmay · · Score: 1
    IBM is actually marketing a new product that they are making from the recycled parts.

    From the press release:

    "It's a high-protein feed for farm animals, insulation for low-income housing, a powerful explosive and a top-notch engine coolant. And best of all, it's made from one hundred percent recycled animals^H^H^H^H^H^H^Hcomputer parts!"

    -

  120. Been done by rkent · · Score: 1
    Hey, isn't there already a great online service that lets you pawn off your broken system on some unsuspecting sucker?

    And they don't even charge $30; only 2.5% of the item's value ;)

  121. Didnt Packard Bell used to do this by ellingtp · · Score: 2

    great!! now we have to go the local computer store and upon up all the new Pentium 4's to make sure that IBM didnt use recycled parts. Yes sirree, this here new computer comes with IBM latest and greatest, what they call a four eight six processor. For a limited time only we will throw in a one hundred and twenty million byte harddrive for free with a 6 yr commitment to MSN.

    --
    "...your future, make it a reality, all you have to do is fight for me" ...ICP
  122. Another good program. by FreeMath · · Score: 2

    In Atlanta I do volunteer work for a non-profit called FREEBYTES they take ANY computer equipment, refurbish it, and redistribute to other non-profit orginizations. We have deals with scrap plastic and metal recyclers to dispose of cases, and will recycle CRTs with a $10 donation.

    --
    This sig intentionally left blank.
  123. I've got no blood left from fixing 486s by TheBahxMan · · Score: 1

    I recently became IBM when I picked up a carload of old 486s with overdrives from my former high school. The damned things are sharp! It's been 3 weeks since i got rid of the damned things and i still have scabs! As for the disposal, living in NM, no one really cares. I mean, what other state would allow WIPP? I've still got a stck of 486's in my closet and the case from a 386 full of 72-pin RAM, Pentium overdrives, 3c509s and 200MB HDDs. I need a transfusion... If you would like to send me your old somputer and $30 bucks, i'd be pleanty happy to have it. I gotta get my beer money from somewhere.

  124. Recycling by TheGeek · · Score: 2

    I think the order of "Reuse, Recycle" is important and there is no need to recycle any working or repairable hardware. If you can't give it to the kid down the street or the Linux enthusiast who needs a firewall, then perhaps these should be sent to another continent. Only when the machine or parts are not repairable should they be taken down into raw materials.

    TheGeek

    --

    TheGeek
    http://www.geekrights.org
    Kill the monkey
  125. Re:Recycle Computer Parts? by canning · · Score: 1

    A mouse hanging from your rearview mirror? Monitors used as fish tanks? A closet full of 386's??

    You must be a real hit with the ladies. Throw something out for god's sake.

    With the stuff contained within the walls of your house, if there ever where a fire, we'd have an ecological disaster on our hands!

    Donate them!! We give all of our old PCs from work to a HAM radio club that one of the guys know. It's life watching a group of ravenous wolves attack an injured deer. They leave nothing behind.

    Would someone please think of the children!

    --
    I love the smell of Karma in the morning
  126. Ring out the old Ring in the New by antonio_danger1 · · Score: 1

    Thats a nice way of life ! well in my opinion recycling is good for the environment! keep it up !

  127. So for $30 I can get rid of my VAX-6000? by Rorschach1 · · Score: 4

    Cool... maybe I'll finally be able to park in my garage! The 6GB of hard drive space I could use, except for the fact that the storage array draws about 20 amps and sounds like a 747 taking off.

    1. Re:So for $30 I can get rid of my VAX-6000? by ecloud · · Score: 1
      That sounds like an interesting machine.

      There are people who collect this stuff rather avidly. I'm on the ClassicCmp list, which you can also join in order to find someone who will take it off your hands. You didn't say where you live, but these collectors are pretty widely distributed. Or if you don't want to join, email me and I will post it for you.

      Me personally, even though the idea of a hard drive that sounds like a 747 taking off sortof appeals to me, I don't have a spare 20 amp circuit to dedicate to it either, and it would generate too much heat in the Phoenix summers. How big is it? If it's just one rack and happens to be in Phoenix, I might be tempted anyway.

  128. Recycle Computer Parts? by BiggestPOS · · Score: 5
    Dear GOD Why? I think I've yet to throw away anything sort of computer hardware no matter how old or worthless, there is a mouse (works actually) hangiing from my rearview mirror, I have a closet full of worthless 386's and a drawer of token ring nics. Old monitors make great fish tanks, and I've never found a whole computer that didn't have some use. I'm not going to pay IBM $30 to haul off my machine, considering the possibility they might donate it to some charitable organization, and then THEY get the tax-break. Heh, I'd hate that. Umm, something else, I love my computer parts and wouldn't part with them, unless of course you paid ME.

    --
    What, me worry?
    1. Re:Recycle Computer Parts? by mOdQuArK! · · Score: 2

      Heh - sounds like the EPA could declare _your_ living area as a hazardous waste SuperFund-cleanup site :)

    2. Re:Recycle Computer Parts? by gregbaker · · Score: 1
      Old monitors make great fish tanks

      Do the fish get lead poisoning? I mean, the glass is chocked-full of lead, right?

      Greg

  129. And we must NOT forget... by Burz · · Score: 1

    ..that all-time classic Electric Dreams!

  130. Odd by Auckerman · · Score: 3
    I'm not sure if I understand. Will IBM pay you $30 or do you play IBM $30 to recycle your computer? It's actually unclear in the press release.

    Also, what advantages does recycling a computer have over just giving it to a needy person (or something like Goodwill)? I actually own a Color Classic (its a collector's item) that is hooked up to my LAN (OS X PB running natd routing to ppp) and functions wonderfully for my kid to do email and web browsing. Seems like a waste to just dismantle a computer that still works.

    --

    Burn Hollywood Burn
  131. This is great! by Electric+Angst · · Score: 2

    In my department, we currently have at least fourty old 286 machines in the attic, enough broken moniters to make a video-wall, and several Sun boxes from the 80's. We never have been able to do anything with them, just put them in the attic. Now, it's almost too crowded to walk up in there, and there are more important, chemistry-related instruments needing the storage space.
    This isn't just great because of the enviornmental impact, but also the way it will cut down on all the damn clutter...
    --

    --
    Feminism is the wild notion that women are human beings.
  132. Re:Uncle Vinny's Discount Computer Disposal by __aakpxi9117 · · Score: 1

    Sure ,today you're giving out demo songs, tomorrow you'll be suing Justin Frankel.

  133. Really Neat! by matth · · Score: 1

    This is a really neat idea. I have a bunch of old computers sitting around the house, and I've always felt it's a waste to jus through them out, yah know? Yuo just feel bad seeing them sitting there on the curb, wiating for the trash man to come and pick them up.. but at $30.00 a pop I think I just may contact IBM and find out what the stipulations on this are.

    1. Re:Really Neat! by Denial+of+Service · · Score: 1
      So, how long after they take my computer will they send me the $30.00? Just wondering.

      ---

      --

      ---
      Slashdot: News For Zealots. Stuff That's Hypocritical.
  134. Don't recycle, repurpose ! by corvi42 · · Score: 1
    what to do with old computers? hmm...

    30 x [ 486dx66, 16mb ] + beowulf = super computer.

    I'm sorry I can't let you do that dave...
    P.S. HAL - shift one alpha == IBM, curious no?

    --

    There are a thousand forms of subversion, but few can equal the convenience and immediacy of a cream pie -Noel Godin
    1. Re:Don't recycle, repurpose ! by Walker+Evans · · Score: 1

      30 x [ 486dx66, 16mb ] + beowulf + 2 bedroom house = supercomputer + 1 bedroom house.

      --
      Shameless Self Promotion : Webhosting at Blender Networks.
  135. Why not Freeboxen? by shik0me · · Score: 3

    I can see this as primarily a benefit to businesses...for individuals, why not just donate to Freeboxen? (www.freeboxen.com) Then you don't even need to pay the shipping...

    1. Re:Why not Freeboxen? by tarsi210 · · Score: 1

      One of the great delusions of the consumer era is that donating is better than throwing out. It's true, to some extent, but you're making the assumption that people want your old crap

      I think a good attitude towards the situation is: "Try to donate it or give it away. If that doesn't work, recycle or dispose of properly."

      The thing I see most often is that people don't even THINK of trying to give it away or donate it, they just head it towards the trash can. The only reason I own a very nice Apple //e computer is because my uncle just happened to hear from my father that I collect computers. Otherwise, this nice little collectors item would have been buried in a deep hole on an Iowa farm along with a bunch of other garbage. I'd like to see such situations be fewer.

  136. GOLD! by superdk · · Score: 2

    When I was photography student, our school was required to save certian chemicals because of the silver content. Photographic films/papers function because of the light sensitivity of silver. Thus the chemical that fixes the image on the film or paper contains a fair amount of unused silver. So the fixer is saved so that it can be sent off and the silver can be reclaimed.

    I'd imagine that with all the older electronics out there a fair amount of gold could be reclaimed from the parts.

    anything is better than just dumping the stuff in the ground to be forgotten about.

    --


    Silly slashdot, sigs are for kids!
  137. They are not reposting, silly,... by Pac · · Score: 2

    ...they are recycling!

    (Yeah, pretty lame. But I couldn't resist.. :))

  138. Re:trash afterthought by knurr · · Score: 1

    now the only thing I got to do is get pass bloody red tape, my job is stupid when it comes to old PC's we cant donate them, I bring up recycling they say its a good idea but... eh of well

    --
    If we refuse to be flexible, we are in effect opting out of the game of life. The world moves on without us.
  139. Re: Repair-ers in 3rd wld. by techwatcher · · Score: 2

    You're absolutely correct there! So many American (and other) "repair" personnel have been told their time is worth more than the cost of the new component, they are taught to replace (usually) rather than repair almost everything. In other countries, those with repair skills or expertise (often self-taught, or taught by peers) actually do REPAIR parts. Their skills and knowledge are seen as very valuable, even if their wages (if any) don't reflect that value. (Then again, just having a source of regular income is valued by workers in many of the countries where used equipment ends up.)

    I knew many persons in a global organization who used to take their laptops (wrapped in a towel) with them every time they went to any African country, and routinely left them there. (This was a nonprofit, private group.) Each member would simply buy a new laptop on arriving back home. Those laptops were valued extremely highly by the communities which received them, despite all the bother of getting them charged where electricity is intermittent, and keeping them repaired when few experts are around. Some schools in the poorest nations have only 2-3 ancient (PC jr., even!) machines for hundreds of eager students, donated by volunteers.

    In fact, if you're ever about to travel to such a country, please search the Web for pleas for those about to travel to act like a courier to take old used computers (already donated) with them: Just shipping them, without anyone on hand to shepherd them through customs, means they won't arrive at their destination!

  140. Re:Astonishingly cruel! by technos · · Score: 2

    Damn man! You're just being cruel to yourself and your machines by starving it for memory! On average I have something like 210 megs of memory per machine! And that's not enough sometimes! You hear the machine start to knock on the HD, screaming its clickety-clack pain to the world, and you know you're a bad, bad man.

    Get thee to a online merchant NOW! Memory is dirt cheap!! Spend three hours of your pay to get that puppy from 64 to 192! End the pain! The suffering! Think of those achingly overused bits in your swap!

    --
    .sig: Now legally binding!
  141. Re:Uhm, you mean I have to pay? by t3df13dl3r · · Score: 1

    yeah, they say they can track you with the serial number, but you could scratch it off and dump it at safeway - or take a serial number off a pc from a "friends" house

  142. muahahah! by ebbv · · Score: 1


    now i can hold the world hostage like a villain from captain planet with all the old 14" monitors in my basement!!!

    PH33R M3!
    ...dave

    --

    Think different? I'd be happy if most people would just think...
  143. Washington Has it Right! by scandalous · · Score: 1

    I have attached a bit of text from http://www.c4kids.org. If you want to read more and discover the specifics, please visit the site. Rest assured that distribution of state surplus via refurbishing by inmates is a great public partnership. Even better is the Wilderness Technology Alliance's involvement in the process of training students in technology use and practice... as well as their involvement in the larger C4Kids effort.

    ***************

    State agencies, community colleges and universities now have two options for the disposal of their surplus computers and computer related equipment:

    Donation - Contact Mark Dhaenens, Computer Refurbishing Program Manager with the Department of Corrections by phone (509) 244-6824 ext. 6400 or FAX (509) 244-6735. Indicate the kind of equipment you wish to donate, contact person and phone number. Arrangements will be made for pickup of all of your equipment by Correctional Industries; you will not need to separate the equipment into "high-end" or "low-end" machines. Refurbished equipment will then be distributed to Educational Service Districts for donation to public schools [see process below]. Each agency will be responsible for tracking their donation activity. Do not submit a Surplus Property Disposal Request (267-A) to the State Surplus Property Program. In order to ensure equity, there are to be NO direct donations of surplus computers or computer-related equipment by state agencies, community colleges and universities to school districts outside of this process.

    State Surplus - Fill out a Surplus Property Disposal Request (267-A) and submit to the State Surplus Property Program. Arrangements will be made to pick up or otherwise dispose of the property. Surplus computers picked up by State Surplus will be resold to other state agencies, governmental entities, private non-profits or the general public.

    Through a partnership with the Wilderness Technology Alliance, Computers for Kids-Washington will now expand its focus to obtain more surplus equipment from private corporations. Much of this additional surplus will be refurbished by students in school-based programs across Washington State. This adds many new dimensions to "Computers 4 Kids -- Washington":

    The Wilderness Technology Alliance will be responsible for coordinating most donations from private industry. They will work with the Alliance for Education, Puget Sound Works, and other non-profits, to get this equipment into school-based computer refurbishing programs across Washington State. School selection will be based upon priorities set by the State Superintendent of Public Instruction. It will include public schools, private schools, and Bureau of Indian Affairs schools.

    The Wilderness Technology Alliance (WTA) will be coordinating with the Office of Vocation Education and other existing school-based programs to create a comprehensive curriculum in computer hardware refurbishing. This curriculum will be available to high schools across Washington. Besides refurbishing the equipment and deploying it in their school district, students will learn the skills necessary to challenge the A+ certification exam. With this industry standard certification, the doors to many high paying, high technology jobs will be open to these students.

    ***************

  144. huge problems with your justification by phossie · · Score: 3
    from the linked article (which is only an appendix to a massive journalistic project)- bold type is my emphasis:

    "We're a wicked throwaway society." Plastic packaging and fast-food containers may seem wasteful, but they actually save resources and reduce trash. The typical household in Mexico City buys fewer packaged goods than an American household, but it produces one-third more garbage, chiefly because Mexicans buy fresh foods in bulk and throw away large portions that are unused, spoiled or stale. Those apples in Dittersdorf's slide, protected by plastic wrap and foam, are less likely to spoil. The lightweight plastic packaging requires much less energy to manufacture and transport than traditional alternatives like cardboard or paper. Food companies have switched to plastic packaging because they make money by using resources efficiently. A typical McDonald's discards less than two ounces of garbage for each customer served -- less than what's generated by a typical meal at home.

    Plastic packaging is routinely criticized because it doesn't decay in landfills, but neither does most other packaging, as William Rathje, an archaeologist at the University of Arizona, has discovered from his excavations of landfills. Rathje found that paper, cardboard and other organic materials -- while technically biodegradable -- tend to remain intact in the airless confines of a landfill. These mummified materials actually use much more landfill space than plastic packaging, which has steadily been getting smaller as manufacturers develop stronger, thinner materials. Juice cartons take up half the landfill space occupied by the glass bottles they replaced; 12 plastic grocery bags fit in the space occupied by one paper bag.

    so, uh, yeah - some Mexican families produce a greater initial bulk of garbage, but it's made up of mostly fresh, unprocessed organic food products. which biodegrade extremely quickly, unlike other "organic" products like paper (or worse packaging materials), which has been processed and condensed so that you're basically waiting for a hyperdense portion of a tree to biodegrade. it also lacks othe natural factors (various critters) that will help the process. that will, of course, take longer than a mostly-eaten apple.

    comparing easily compostable waste mass to plastic and other petroleum waste that will take (at least) many hundreds of years to biodegrade is an absolute farce - it's comparing apples and plastic wrap, and they're just not the same thing.

    similar quality journalism pervades the rest of that article. the plastic waste might be lighter day by day, but it doesn't go away, either. when was the last time anybody saw plastic detritus?

    i'd also like to point out that a large part of McDonald's waste is carried out of the store by customers, and thus is probably not accounted for with those numbers.

    --

    [|]
  145. Beowulf Cluster! by scott1853 · · Score: 1

    Just think of the possibilities if we all emptied our closets and created a massive cluster. Hell, I think the /. audience alone could beat IBMs new machine with their old junk.

    Ooooh, then we could really kill in the distributed.net contests.

  146. Good use for lead by bmongar · · Score: 1

    Maybe we can use the lead for a sugar free sweetener like in the middle ages.

    --
    As x approaches total apathy I couldn't care less.
  147. Paying them to avoid pollution they designed? by Medievalist · · Score: 1

    I hear shipping the system to IBM with a fake return address is cheaper.
    --Charlie

  148. Batteries need recycling too... by cluening · · Score: 3

    One thing I rarely see mentioned is the need for battery recycling. Those little things are full of lead, mercury, various acids, and all kinds of other nasty stuff (depending on the flavor of battery). Battery rechargers are a good way to keep them out of the environment, but remembering not to just throw them away is the best thing in the end. There are normally places in most cities (I think, at least here in the US) to take dead batteries. Use them!

    --
    Posted from the wireless couch.
    1. Re:Batteries need recycling too... by mrdogi · · Score: 1

      I bring all of my dead batteries to Rat Shack. Yes, they actually have a purpose. Also, I recall hearing somewhere that legally, any place that sells batteries are supposed to accept old batteries for recycling, although I've never actually tries bringing one to Target to find out. I'm afraid they'd just throw it away, defeating the purpose.

  149. Uncle Vinny's Discount Computer Disposal by spellcheckur · · Score: 3
    Home Stereo lacking DTS?
    Do you still have a Tube TV?
    Is there a "windows" key on your keyboard?!

    DON'T JUST SIT THERE! Call Uncle Vinny's Discount Computer Disposal for all your Disposal Needs!

    We'll take all your unused computer equiment, VCRs, DVD Players and home stereos (working order only, please) for the low, LOW price of $14.99 (shipping not included, taxes may apply).

    We'll get rid of that out-of-date P3-500 so you don't have to!

    *Uncle Vinny takes no knowledge of what open-source operating system or pr0nographic DVDs may be used on your disposed of junk, but don't you worry! it won't be traceable to you! Call 1-800-COMP-U-GON and wait for the black van at the end of your block!

  150. This is an IBM plot to ruin Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    Once IBM has cornered the market on 16 meg 486's, what will we run Linux on?

  151. Above is a goatse.cx link AM TOO! by arete · · Score: 1

    Above is a goatse.cx link
    including Reply and Anne Marie's fake post...

    you've been warned.

    --
    Looking for freelance Actionscript (Flash/Flex) or ColdFusion work and/or freelance developers. Email me, put Slashdot
  152. UPS and empty truck space by mccabem · · Score: 1

    I guess the point is that when you send this "junk" on FedEX, UPS or another carrier's trucks, it's going to be a highly efficient use of existing space.

    Assuming they're using UPS-Ground service (or equivalent), rail-transport is also used wherever possible - ultra-cheap shipping.