Slashdot Mirror


Lone Gunmen Get the Axe From Fox

squee23 noted that Fox is axing the lone gunman. Almost everyone I know watched the seriers premiere and bolted, which was unfortunate: the premiere sucked but almost every episode there after was pretty damn good: the first episode simply wasn't funny, and airing it was suicide. The X-Files is returning, sans Mulder. Fortunately, The Family Guy will come back, as well as the premiere of the live action version of The Tick.

323 comments

  1. who watches TV anymore? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    "Fifty-seven channels and nothing on."

    1. Re:who watches TV anymore? by drsoran · · Score: 2

      Clearly this kind of wholesale signal piracy will not be tolerated for much longer. When will the TV stations cut off this copyright abuse and start broadcasting encrypted digital signals where you are required to have a special box that you have to pay a subscription for to unlock? I can't believe Hollywood puts up with letting people have this stuff for free. Hell, we already know many people will PAY for cable TV or DSS and still watch the commercial too. Why should they give it away at all anymore?

    2. Re:who watches TV anymore? by celtic+heretic · · Score: 1
      And that post is a prime example of what it's criticizing. It serves all opinions. Think about it. If you're a literate technophile atheist what was just said promotes your opinion of 'ignorant, luddite deists.' If you're a religious literate professional that post bolsters your opinion of 'hypocritical, self-centred egotists.'

      I say this because no matter what side of a debate (and I use the word loosely) people are on these days they are certain the other side is not only wrong but choose to be blind to the truth. Maybe it was alway so. The result is noone is giving the other the right to have differing opinions. Noone is respecting the others' individuality. And noone wants to change. In the meantime the media, the 'Net, our so-called peers feed us what we want to hear about our own opinions and get rich from it.

      Better then to listen to your neighbour, and even if they are stupid, wrong and ignorant, give them credit for being people with rights and then try to find a way to live with that even if you think what they do/want/work toward is destructive/a blasphemy/pathological.

      not only is the universe stranger than you imagine,
      it's stranger than you are capable of imagining

      --

    3. Re:who watches TV anymore? by goldmeer · · Score: 1
      Maybe they thought those were channels?

      I don't remember where I heard this, so treat it like the probable misinformation that it is, but you are right. To the TV cable guys, telephone and cable modem data *is* just like another channel or 2 on the coax.

      -Joe

    4. Re:who watches TV anymore? by scoove · · Score: 2

      Funny... I called the cable folks and had mine disconnected today (the tv part... @home broadband and telephone comes thru the same coax too but I wanted to keep those).

      Unfortunately they must only train their de-installers up to OSI layer 1... snip! Internet and phone gone too.

      Maybe they thought those were channels?

      *sigh*

      Scoove

    5. Re:who watches TV anymore? by scoove · · Score: 2

      Yea. Like when the phone installer came out to install ISDN years back and referred to it as magic line.

      I asked him why they called it that - his response was (verbatim - how could you forget this?):

      "We call it magic line cause when you put a dial tone tester on it, you hear nothing! But somehow, the sucker works anyways!"

      Totally priceless Bell behavior!!!

      *scoove*

    6. Re:who watches TV anymore? by Kwelstr · · Score: 1

      I've cut the cable off and set up a roof antena... Free TV! What a concept. Same crap, but free.

      --


      ~~~Please pass the salt, I hate unsalted MD5s :-/
    7. Re:who watches TV anymore? by Kwelstr · · Score: 2

      News? I usually watch PBS, and we even get the BBC news for half hour, that added to the 1 hr PBS news, takes away most of the stupid local news time in my house.

      By the way, BBC news IS hilarious! ;-)

      --


      ~~~Please pass the salt, I hate unsalted MD5s :-/
    8. Re:who watches TV anymore? by kerrbear · · Score: 1
      People now can become completely disconnected from reality because there is always a 'news' publisher/broadcaster who is willing to cater to the whims ofthat customer.[snip] where previously we only had the option to choose rose colored glasses, or not.

      That's a bit pessimistic. I like the greater access. I take it upon myself to read many more sources for my news so I can get a broader understanding. Especially I like to read foreign newspapers online. Like the Times of India or Inside China Today or the BBC or Pravda. For those of us who were tired of the same old sources, its a real revolution in current events knowledge. All these are in English. It's awsome. For more check out Yahoo's list of foreign papers.

      Now the population at large has the 'opportunity' to suffer from what the Romans called the Imperial Diease, the condition of becoming acustomed to having every desire fulfilled, every whim satisfied and every gross pleasure gratified.

      As with anything, there will be abuses and I agree with you that many will take that road. But I think the trade off of having more perspectives is worth it.

    9. Re:who watches TV anymore? by hillct · · Score: 3

      I dumped cable TV when a new sleezier cable operator took over in my area. I was dismayed to find that the quality of broadcast programming has really gone down hill. Particularly local news. I'm in a major technology mecca where all the local network affiliates are large and well financed. The ration of human interest stories, to, real news has increased ten fold since the last time I watched local news (rather than CNN).

      I refuse to believe that there isn't enough legitimate news to fill the half hour from 11:00pm to 11:30pm. It's pathetic. the local NBC affiliate even has a segment where they will allow you to vote on their website for the news stry you want to see that night. What they do is give viewers the option of watching one half baked news story or one purely human interest story. I guess this is how they justify it. People are constantly voting for the human interest story, so I suppose that's what they assume peopl want more of.

      It seems that nowadays people can create their own view of the world through the news sources they make use of. Thanks to int Internet, the sheer number of news sources has increased to the point where you don't have a choice between the liberal newspaper and the conservative newspaper, but now have the choice to select anything inbetween as well as numerous fringe publications.

      People now can become completely disconnected from reality because there is always a 'news' publisher/broadcaster who is willing to cater to the whims ofthat customer. I guess in a sense feeding the fringe lunatic in all of us. We all percieve the world different.y, and it is important to have differing perspectives, but we the news consumers of the world, now have the choice of through what colored glasses we view the world, where previously we only had the option to choose rose colored glasses, or not.

      Now the population at large has the 'opportunity' to suffer from what the Romans called the Imperial Diease, the condition of becoming acustomed to having every desire fulfilled, every whim satisfied and every gross pleasure gratified. It has the characteristic of serving to promote your own opinions and world view to a level where fact and opinion become synonymous. Emperors were surrounded with yes-men who gratified every opinion and every wish. The modern news media caters in the same way to their audiences. It's really a dangerous prescident to be setting and I'm saddened that this is what the information revolution has wrought.

      --CTH

      --

      --

      --Got Lists? | Top 95 Star Wars Line
  2. Re:It made US look stupid! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Not that you need any help with that anyways.

  3. Re:/. doesn't like X-Files? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If I see scully cry in one more episode, I am going to heave!

  4. How can it be plural? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If its plural, you're not exactly "lone"

    (if you don't get the reference, please don't reply or moderate. thx.)

    1. Re:How can it be plural? by MindStalker · · Score: 1

      In most languages there are things called expressions these such expressions don't have to fit proper grammer, nor do they have to be complete sentences. As they are only expressions, geez deal with it.

    2. Re:How can it be plural? by (startx) · · Score: 1

      Or stole it from the name of the band in Airheads.

    3. Re:How can it be plural? by (startx) · · Score: 1

      right, my bad, sorry

    4. Re:How can it be plural? by antdude · · Score: 2

      Who knows. Ask the FOX people who made up that title [grin].

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    5. Re:How can it be plural? by blowhole · · Score: 1

      Airheads were the Lone Rangers. But same concept.

      --
      "Ask me about Loom"
  5. X-Files ticking clock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This next season of X-Files should DEFINITELY be the last one... Gillian Anderson's contract is up and she's already bitching about how she signed on for too long and for too little money. Unless they find another redhead to replace her.

    Fox is desperately trying to find another 60 minute tentpole to hold up their sunday nights... something that will be around after X-Files is gone. They tried Harsh Realm... Lone Gunmen... they keep thinking they can recapture the magic of the X-files. Ain't that easy, folks. There is no formula.

    BTW, anybody wanna predict how long it is before David Duchovny is doing softcore cable porn again? The X-files may be nothing without Mulder... but guess what: David Duchovny is also nothing without Mulder. Just another dull, good-looking, wooden guy. They're a dime a dozen.

    1. Re:X-Files ticking clock by phenomenologism · · Score: 1
      "Just another dull, good-looking, wooden guy. They're a dime a dozen."

      can you imagine him and Jason Lee in a buddy picture? eesh.

  6. Re:I really like TLG by Alan · · Score: 2

    I gotta agree with you. It wasn't "real", but what on TV is? I hope that those complaining that TLG wasn't researched enough aren't the same type who compare "Boot Camp" with anything resembling reality.

    It was a decent enough show to come home to on a friday night anyway. Now what is there? Will I have to go out and discover a "real life" or something?

  7. Re:Yeah, The Tick! by jandrese · · Score: 2

    At one point in the series the Tick decided he needed a "battle cry." Well he was a super hero and all, and of course all super heros have battle cries. Unfortunatly he eating soup when this idea accidentally collided with his tick-sized brain. Arthur (his sidekick with the moth outfit) stayed perfectly in character and choose "Not in the face!" as his battle cry. It was a classic moment in the series.

    Nobody is prepared for the return of the Ottoman Empire!

    Down that path lies madness. On the other hand, the road to hell is paved with melting snowballs.

    --

    I read the internet for the articles.
  8. WHO CARES... by kir · · Score: 1

    You know... when I left the U.S. (6 years ago) I was starting to become annoyed with American television. Since then, I've been back to various parts of the continental U.S. and Hawaii several times for 2 - 3 week stretches. Each time I've noticed American television gets dumber and dumber and dumber. It's been dumbed down to the pointed I'm actually insulted when I watch it (and I'm not the sharpest tool in the shed).

    I used to think television in Japan was bad, but over the years I've realized it's stupid, but it's *OPENLY STUPID*. The creators know it's stupid, the viewers know it's stupid... it's stupid-fun stupid. The creators of American television programming really do think we're all morons. FUCK THEM and FUCK T.V. I'll stick with my BOOKS (WTF are those?) and the few DVDs I own (so few because the movie industry sucks even more!).

    Word!

    --
    Kir

    --
    3cx.org - A truly bad website.
  9. Re:It's all about the Family Guy by The+Man · · Score: 2
    Fox has tonnes of shitty shows they can pull instead.

    Agreed. Even though I can't stand Family Guy, it's still better than the 76th rerun of Police Videos Episode 41. But neither of them holds a candle to Lone Gunmen. There are only three things I even watch on Fox any more: Futurama, Lone Gunmen, and Malcolm. Nothing else looks even vaguely worthwhile. I'll miss Lone Gunmen; Friday night between Police Videos and the news is about the worst slot I can imagine, so it sounds like they never really gave it a chance. Now the question is what to do during the hour after Futurama and before Malcolm. The Simpsons has decayed badly, and there's no way Family Guy will keep me watching...

  10. Re:It's all about the Family Guy by drsoran · · Score: 1

    What? What can be better than police videos? I can never get enough of real-life car chases, bank heists gone wrong, and raunchy hilarious antics on the part of restaurant workers sneezing into someone's pizza. That kind of classic real-life drama couldn't be scripted! We need more reality TV Fox!! PLEASE! :-)

  11. Re:Geek TV (the invisible man) by demon · · Score: 1

    If you don't have cable or digital-sat service, check out late-night on your local channels - one of our local channels apparently has (current! believe it or not) episodes of The Invisible Man, Stargate SG1 and other shows that originate on cable, through a syndication arrangement. (Had digital-sat service, but we terminated it - god _damn_ it's a rip, but my parents thought it was a good deal for movies - too bad they didn't listen to me.)

    If you're a poor bastard, or just don't want to pay the outrageous monthly fees, it may be a good alternative. (Yeah yeah, so you don't stay up till all hours - check schedules, and learn to set the clock on your VCR. Or just get a Tivo already.)
    _____

    Sam: "That was needlessly cryptic."

    --

    Sam: "That was needlessly cryptic."
    Max: "I'd be peeing my pants if I wore any!"
  12. Re:Fox missing X-files precident, and other errors by demon · · Score: 1

    Yes, but then Fox didn't have the same wide viewer base it does now either. Back when the X-Files was still young, a lot of cities didn't have local Fox stations - about the only place to see it was on cable at the time. They have a lot more audience that must be satisfied now, and I'm sure if the numbers aren't turning up, and quick, they decide "We need something new here, stat!"
    _____

    Sam: "That was needlessly cryptic."

    --

    Sam: "That was needlessly cryptic."
    Max: "I'd be peeing my pants if I wore any!"
  13. Re:Just goes to show... by jafac · · Score: 2

    don't forget the toilet humor.

    --

    These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  14. Re:The Tick? by jafac · · Score: 2

    would you like your Steroid Crunchies, or Steroid Crunchies with Marshmallows?

    --

    These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  15. Re:Live action Tick? by jafac · · Score: 2

    yeah, Ninja world, and the mascot, "Lil' Nip!"

    --

    These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  16. Re:Why would anyone like X-Files? by jafac · · Score: 2

    Evil Dead 2 was FAR superior.

    --

    These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  17. Re:Geek TV by jafac · · Score: 3

    "This also explains why stereotypes ABOUND on network TV."

    To say NOTHING of how they abound on Slashdot:
    Stereotypes of what Geeks are like (not good writers), and what they like (boring details about the evolution of life on planets 1.4 times the gravity of Earth with a Methane atmosphere).
    Sterotypes of what Hollywood Screenwriters are like (cocaine-snorting yes-men cranking out mindless drivel).

    I know we have to explain these phenomena as best we can, but let's avoid calling Mr. Kettle black now, shall we?

    --

    These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  18. Re:Mindless Ramblings by jafac · · Score: 3


    I agree about doing XFiles without Duchovny.

    It also won't be the same with Scully tied down with a screaming brat - unless "they" kidnap the brat too (we'll see Sunday night).

    The Satan Worshipper specialist partner could work out, especially since there was past involvement. That implies more soap opera side plots (which wasn't at all a bad thing about the original xfiles, you knew Mulder was a perv, and you knew Scully wanted him, and you knew they would eventually do it. - that was fun to watch - until it became tiresome after 5 years).

    They really *could* pull off a decent transition of the XFiles, but I doubt they are capable. Someone else made the conclusion that the XFiles has been about formula, and rehashed to death plotlines, and a big soap opera for the past two years.
    I think that the story line IS salvagable with the T1000 guy (I just can't call him anything else!) - but the writers are going to have to work damn hard, and churn out some damn good stuff, and CONNECT with the old material, without recycling it.
    A lot of the fun of the old XFiles was the portrayal of little-known urban myths, (chubacabra, etc), monster-of-the-week, and frankly, they've run through them all. That angle is getting pretty weak - the only thing they have left is covering the fallout from past things (like the shape-changer guy whose in prison,etc). Then the Government conspiracy arc thing was great, but you can only drag that out so far, the bad guys need to get their comeuppance in the end, with drama, so once you destroy a 50 year old conspiracy, where do you go from there? You can't create a new one out of thin air. There's only one Government. Once cancer man was gone, that was it.

    They've got some heavy challenges ahead. I think that the challenges are not insurmountable, but I also do not believe (based on past performance) that they will rise to the occasion. Sadly.

    --

    These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  19. Re:Fox has exactly two good shows: by Hrunting · · Score: 5

    Actually, AFAIC, Futurama is already better than The Simpsons (note, not The Simpsons in their prime, just the show as it stands now). It makes sense, though. Groening, et al, took the good writers off of The Simpsons and put them on Futurama so that it would have the benefit of well-written episodes from the beginning to bring in a large supportive audience. Futurama is just plain funnier. The gags are faster, the humor is darker, the comraderie is more bitter, and the episodes all around are more cohesive. The use of special guests is consistently flaunted exceptionally well through the "heads in a jar" theme, which means you don't have to fight to believe Drew Barrymore as Krusty's suddenly received daughter or some such nonsense. Believing that Lucy Liu's head survived because of futuristic technology is much easier to digest. The recent episode with the Harlem Globetrotters and the time shifts was downright the fastest, most hilarious, continuously played-out gag I've ever seen.

    What do The Simpsons have this season? I lot of completely inane, very loosely organized episodes without any constant thread that made the earlier episodes such a joy to watch. Now, it's like watch 4 five-minute skits. I'm glad the writers are living on in Futurama with fresh faces and fresh adventures (that's much easier to do in a completely fresh setting, of course), but it kind of hurts to see The Simpsons sort of degrade like an old NFL pro who won't retire.

    Bite My Shiny Metal ...

  20. Re:Picking apart "Lone Gunmen" by Joe+Rumsey · · Score: 1

    Jimmy wasn't in the pilot at all. Based on that, I think maybe the network made Carter add him ("Put someone who isn't a geek on the show or you don't get to make it"). But I agree with the sentiment either way, the show didn't need Yves or Jimmy at all, and Yves actually hurt it by never letting the Gunmen get themselves out of their own predicaments. Why even bother calling the shoe "The Lone Gunmen" when Yves is the only one who ever knows what's going on? She would've been alright in an occasional part, but every week is way too much.

  21. Re:Yeah, The Tick! by Joe+Rumsey · · Score: 3
    The show was slated to be a mid-season replacement, but was then bumped to next fall. There is still no assurance from Fox that it will be in the Fall line-up, either... so you might not actually get to see it until January of next year.


    Actually, if you'd read the article, you would have seen that The Tick will be on on Thursday following The Family Guy. It isn't a fan-boy article, it's from a Fox press release. The reason it was bumped to next Fall instead of already being on is due to the writers and actors strike. They didn't want to show what they had and then be unable to produce for for an indefinite amount of time.

    I actually saw the entire pilot in an early form late last year. It was missing most sound effects, no music, a few other rough edges, but it was one of the funniest things I've seen in a long time. I am really looking forward to that show. The version I saw had no laugh track - I am really hoping it's going to stay that way, adding stupid canned laughter would just kill it. Luckily I think Fox actually understands that some of the time (Simpsons, Malcom in the Middle, all their other animated shows - none of them have laugh tracks).
  22. The X-Files was good. by Tofu · · Score: 1

    I am glad they cancelled the show. It was stupid. Badly written and badly acted. Just like most of this seasons X-Files. I wish they would cancel that. I know most of this is redundant but I feel I have say something. The X-Files needs to be stopped. Check out http://www.paddlecreek.net/ for more.


    --



    Can you see Iron City here?
  23. Re:Oh Gawd no! by Tofu · · Score: 1

    You are right!! The first four years were GREAT!! But you are right. After season 5 and some of season 5 it has sucked.



    --



    Can you see Iron City here?
  24. Re:Geek TV by evilandi · · Score: 3
    BluedemonX: especially not jiggling bits of female anatomy

    So basically you're saying that the inclusion of any female in any action show is sensationalist and that all female action stars are there merely as sex objects?

    What a load of chauvanist bollocks!

    Breasts do jiggle, even small ones. Get over it. Having breasts doesn't make a woman a bimbo, it makes her a woman.

    --

    --
    Andrew Oakley - www.aoakley.com
  25. Re:Just goes to show... by Partisan · · Score: 1

    I'm proud to say that I caught it. But it was almost too quick. When they said it, it could have been, "Boole" (which would have been cool too). It's when they quickly panned across the sign is when you see that it's, "Boulle". They should have named the simp "Caeser" instead of, "Peanuts", or had him name himself that.

  26. Re:INCITEFUL IS NOT A WORD, DUMBASS by unitron · · Score: 2

    Are you sure you didn't mean suffix instead of prefix there?

    --

    I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  27. Re:MAXIMUM BOB by unitron · · Score: 2
    MAXIMUM BOB!

    Another instance of leave it on the air just long enough to get you interested in it and then, abracadabra, it disappears without a trace.

    --

    I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  28. Re:Just goes to show... by unitron · · Score: 2
    "Sadly, ever area I develop any competency in, it ruins tv and movies that ever reference that subject matter."

    I was working in radio broadcasting when WKRP came out and it was the hilarious exception to that rule. Both I and a lot of other announcers I've talked to over the years were sure that the writers and producers must have worked at some of the same stations that we had. The only thing they missed was a dramatization of a "dead air" dream.

    Okay, nothing like the Thanksgiving promotion episode ever really happened, but it could have.

    --

    I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  29. Re:I really like TLG by unitron · · Score: 2
    "It seems to be a phenomenon with my wife and me: the more we both enjoy a show, the more likely it is to get cancelled. (Fair Warning: CSI is looking interesting.)"

    After the way CBS jerked us around with Big Apple, feel free to kill CSI (which the eyeball network seems to want to keep).

    You and the missus aren't by any means the only ones to suffer from "*don't* ignore it and it'll go away" syndrome. I'm surprised that one of the networks hasn't hired me to sabatoge their competition by watching it.

    --

    I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  30. Re:Lone Gunmen is Fantastic! by unitron · · Score: 2

    Just be glad there wasn't a TLG episode where *they* were in heat.

    --

    I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  31. Re:The sleeping months by unitron · · Score: 2
    A show where a CIA agent seeking to thwart a presidential assasination plot figures that he's ahead of the curve enough to catch a good night's sleep. Yeah, that'll be gripping drama.

    Unless they have him take several naps/meditation sessions where he battles the bad guys in some psychic realm or something. That could be be really wretched TV.

    --

    I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  32. Re:Oh Gawd no! by unitron · · Score: 3

    Who said anything about teeth?

    --

    I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  33. Re:Die Fledermaus by MaufTarkie · · Score: 1

    Nope. Cartoon only.

    --
    Without you I'm one step closer to happiness without violence.
  34. SPOOOOOOOOOON by Archfeld · · Score: 1

    The TICK is awesome, I just hope the live action doesn't totally blow it.

    I aspire to become like my hero, Little WOODEN BOY

    --
    errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
  35. Lone Gunmen Rocks!!! by Y2K+is+bogus · · Score: 2

    I can't beleive all the people who are dissing the Lone Gunmen! This show is NOT a geek show, it's a Scooby doo gone high tech. It's about 3(4) bumbling guys that try to solve mysteries and do it comedically.

    The Lone Gunmen were all that gave X-Files levity in an otherwise lockjawed-acting-style show.

    Some other network HAS to pick up this show, it's so funny to watch them bungle something so badly, then see them turn it around for the good in the end. It's only getting better!

    I have nearly every ep on my replay, it's the only show I watch on Fridays, it's gotta go somewhere!

  36. There is no spooooooon by forkboy · · Score: 1

    It's his battle cry. It's completely silly and arbitrary, and I'm not exactly sure why it's funny, but if you've ever seen the great gusto with which he bellows it, you can't help but chuckle.

    --
    This message brought to you by the Council of People Who Are Sick of Seeing More People.
  37. Re:Picking apart "Lone Gunmen" by llywrch · · Score: 2

    Jimmy & Yves both had potential as characters: Yves as the mysterious agent-for-hire who actually knew the stuff that the Gunmen only wildly speculated about, & Jimmy as the average guy who was not as smart as the 3 title characters, but had more common sense.

    However, none of them had characters that were well-thought out or more than one-dimensional. (What was the real difference between Frohickey & Langley -- besides the fact one was older than the other? And we saw little of Byer's geek quotent in the series -- he was just the guy who wore a suit & stood around.)

    Oh well, another source for geek trivia, & we know some script kiddies will be mining the show for K-rad k3wl handles.

    Geoff

    --
    I think I see a trend here. Maybe for them it really would be easier to muzzle the entire internet than to produce p
  38. Re:Just goes to show... by Sethb · · Score: 2

    I turned off the season pass for Gunmen on my TiVo a couple of weeks ago. I gave the show a chance, I'm a devoted X-Files fan, but it was too brainless for me.

    My biggest gripe is that there was nothing supernatural, spooky, or government-conspiratorial about the new series. For inhabiting the same world as Mulder & Scully, the Gunmen spend an awful lot of time chasing the world's lamest criminals. Jimmy Bond is just annoying and stupid, but at least Yves is hot.

    The CONSTANT technical inaccuracies drove me nuts. I understand that you have to sacrifice some reality to make the plots work, but some of the errors in the show could be corrected with very little work at all.

    In the pilot, they talk about the new fancy CPU having a built in modem to it that causes some security concerns. Never mind that you'd have to open up your PC and plug a cable into the CPU for this "modem" to work. All of their technology references fell short. I can forgive one or two, but after you're bombarded with 15 in a row, it just becomes apparent that the show is insulting your intelligence and attempting to appeal to the lowest common denominator. I know that a show needs a large audience to be successful, but TLG was too geeky for the non-geeks and too inaccurate for the true geeks.

    Check out Freaks & Geeks on Fox Family if you want a really enjoyable show. There were only something like 18 episodes made before NBC axed it, but they're absolutely hilarious. I never saw the show when it was on NBC, but after discovering it on Fox Family, every single person I've introduced it to has loved it and watched every episode. It all plays out very true-to-life, and you can actually believe that most of these situations could or would happen to these kids...
    ---

    --
    When in danger or in doubt, run in circles, scream and shout. --Robert A. Heinlein
  39. Re:Geek TV by Koschei · · Score: 1

    Ever seen the UK show 'Spaced'?

    That's geek TV. and darn good too.

    --
    -- koschei
  40. The Tick? by kzinti · · Score: 2

    Is this the same superhero-wannabe dude who is always ragging Superman... and once arrested a Buick? At least in the few issues I read years and years ago.

    --Jim

    1. Re:The Tick? by szcx · · Score: 1

      Yes. The comic also had a Man-Eating Cow.

  41. Re:You need TiVo by deeny · · Score: 2
    Are you saying that you like Black Scorpion? Compared to that, Dark Angel is pure art.

    That said, almost all my favorite shows have been cancelled in the last couple of years:

    Total Recall 2070
    La Femme Nikita
    The Lone Gunman
    Star Trek: Voyager
    Cleopatra 2525
    Stargate SG-1
    Xena

    As my husband says: <cue feminist rant> - most were series with strong female characters. Afaik, Cleo was the first hourly drama with a black female lead -- for example.

    At least there's still Buffy, Angel and Andromeda. And Farscape.

    _Deirdre

  42. Re:Picking apart "Lone Gunmen" by Mike+Buddha · · Score: 1

    Pop quiz: who's the better actor: whatsherface, or William Shatner?

    Tough one. I'm going to complicate matters by voting for the guy who played Frankie 'Dishpan' Santana in the last season of the A-Team.

    --
    by Mike Buddha -- Someday the mountain might get him, but the law never will.
  43. Re:The sleeping months by Mike+Buddha · · Score: 2

    Maybe they all use a lot of meth. That would make for a hell of a series. A bunch of Gen-Xer's locked in a room with a buncha' 8-balls of Teamster-grade crank. I'd watch that.

    --
    by Mike Buddha -- Someday the mountain might get him, but the law never will.
  44. Picking apart "Lone Gunmen" by Mike+Buddha · · Score: 5

    The big problem I had with the show was twofold: Jimmy Bond and Eve. They were so poorly written and so miserably acted that it was painful. In later episodes Jimmy became almost a good thing, because the character became less plain stupid and more idiot savant.

    Eve is an all around loss. They really didn't need a guardian angel to come in and save the day every single episode. She's just too competent to believe. Plus, the woman who plays that character is a terrible actress.

    All in all I think the "bit" characters dragged the show down. I think it's too bad that Chris Carter didn't feel that the Lone Gunmen could carry the show by themselves and had to come up with these two sorry anchors.

    --
    by Mike Buddha -- Someday the mountain might get him, but the law never will.
    1. Re:Picking apart "Lone Gunmen" by mrsam · · Score: 1
      Actually it's "Yves", not Eve. I turned up closed captioning the other day, to make sure how "Lee Harvey Oswald" got derived :-)

      Pop quiz: who's the better actor: whatsherface, or William Shatner?

      ---

    2. Re:Picking apart "Lone Gunmen" by ovapositor · · Score: 1

      You are a very sad man.....

    3. Re:Picking apart "Lone Gunmen" by Mr.+Sketch · · Score: 1

      Personally, I think Yve and Jimmy were great additions to the cast. They needed a non-tech savvy person so they could explain some things to the layman. Yve was just around for the 'hot chick' factor I thought. But she was pretty shallow, always in it for the money and very predictable, but was a good addition nonetheless I thought.

    4. Re:Picking apart "Lone Gunmen" by IronChef · · Score: 2


      Yves was awful. I could see her as an occasional opponent or ally, but a regular? Blech.

      I was really dreading Jimmy Bond's role at first, but I immediately grew to like him. I thought that he made the perfect foil for the trio.

      Anyway, I hope the Lone Gunmen made enough to retire on from their short stint in the spotlight. (It was sad to see the actor who played Frohicke at GenCon a few years ago. It's a rare actor who's career can get BETTER after a game industry convention appearance...)

  45. Re:Dawgone it! by rnturn · · Score: 2
    ``Tough choice, but I'll take the muppets.''

    I'd prefer reruns of `The Muppet Show'.
    --

    --
    CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
  46. Re:Dawgone it! by rnturn · · Score: 2
    ``The reason there's nothing good to watch Friday night is young men 18-49 are off doing stuff''

    Only if they're not married or don't have kids. Our kids are normally in bed by 8:00 so TLG was nice to unwind to. BTW, glad the high end of your definition of `young' includes guys my age -- though not by much. :-)
    --

    --
    CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
  47. Dawgone it! by rnturn · · Score: 3

    The only thing worth watching on Friday night and now it's cancelled? Looks like I'll get more reading done now so I guess there's an upside after all.

    (Sorry but `The Family Guy' was/is not funny.)
    --

    --
    CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
    1. Re:Dawgone it! by knobboy · · Score: 1

      What, you forgot about watching Iron Chef on Friday nights? Of course, they are reruns at the moment, but it's still a blast to watch.

  48. Re:Just goes to show... by SteveM · · Score: 2

    Hack the flight control system of a commercial airliner and land it. =) Not over the phone ...

    Agreed. Yet everyone seems to like the X-Files and they make the same type of drive you nuts errors.

    How many times does Mulder or Scully go into a dark room/cave/alley/... alone without calling for back up? Pull out the damm cellphone and let somebody know where you're going for christsakes!

    Aliens, immortals, poltergists, are all fine but it was the details that made the show unwatchable for me. Just like TLG.

    Steve M

  49. Re:Just goes to show... by SteveM · · Score: 2

    The inside jokes (ok Yves too) were the only reasons to watch. It was a trade off between the inaccuracies and the jokes.

    Did you catch that Langley was wearing a Dead Kennedys T-shirt in the finale? (I caught the Boulle reference but not the Clinton one.)

    But the inaccuracies just drove me nuts.

    Steve M

  50. Re:I really like TLG by esper · · Score: 1

    Frohike/El Lobo was a tango dancer, not flamenco. Related, but very different. (And I'd have to say that that episode was the best treatment of (Argentine-style, not ballroom) tango I've seen in mainstream U.S. media, bar none.)

  51. Oh Gawd no! by Lumpy · · Score: 2

    X files has sucked from season 5 and after. I'm sorry but you can only re-hash the same over and over and over and over. The first 3 years were the best, it's time to bury it.

    I used to love X files, now it's just some stupid soap.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:Oh Gawd no! by nublord · · Score: 2
      What on earth are you feeding your cat that requires you to floss it's teeth?

      ...rather floss my cat. Hahaha....

    2. Re:Oh Gawd no! by Xoro · · Score: 1

      The series has pretty much sucked since the movie (which itself wasn't too bad other than being an overlong episode with a big effects budget).

      That's just it. If you recall, the best XFs used to be all about teasing. Things in the shadows, evidence disappearing, etc. The Mulder/Scully tension mirrored this and enhanced it. After the movie, the plot lines became pornographic (d00d! They _showed_ it!) and lost their subtlety. Worse, when they started explaining things, the writers were never came up with back stories as good as the ones the fans had been imagining. Once this new mindset ("All Secrets Will Be Revealed!") had set in, everything they tried to do to make it better just made it worse, and it spiralled downward into the nadir of this season. I wish they'd just kill it, or do one more movie rather than dragging it out over another season. They only seem to come up with 90 minutes of usable material per season anyway.

      --
      Kill, Tux, kill!
    3. Re:Oh Gawd no! by CTachyon · · Score: 1

      X files has sucked from season 5 and after. I'm sorry but you can only re-hash the same over and over and over and over.

      I'm glad I'm not alone in that boat. The series has pretty much sucked since the movie (which itself wasn't too bad other than being an overlong episode with a big effects budget). I used to catch X-Files regularly, but now I'm pondering whether to catch the season finale or floss my cat.

      Here, kitty, kitty...

      --
      Range Voting: preference intensity matters
  52. Re:Just goes to show... by Lx · · Score: 1

    Exactly. The show blew, plain and simple - I know some people think that kind of stuff is funny anyhow, but when the media tries to do the whole geek-chic stuff, it just never works. It wasn't nearly as bad, but I still can't understand how people can enjoy Hackers(other than the 2 very prominent, obvious reasons) - even if it was supposed to be inaccurate in a funny way, I still cringe.

    The Lone Gunmen, on the other hand, was a bunch of obnoxious pseudo-techspeak mixed with run of the mill unfunny Fox comedy. I'm glad it's dead.

    -=lx=-

  53. Re:Just goes to show... by RasputinAXP · · Score: 1
    Thanks for the backup, man. After all, clueless mods have seemed to be the norm lately.

    It's the TICK, people.
    --

  54. Re:It's not the network's decision! by RasputinAXP · · Score: 1
    Are you sure that's not "the Shaolin temple"? Dunno, I haven't seen the movie in a while and I've been "corrected" several times in the past few months, so I'm leaving it as-is until I have the time to dig up what the EXACT quote is.


    --

  55. It's not the network's decision! by RasputinAXP · · Score: 2
    It was handed down from above, from men who know more than they let on! Men who hold the secrets of this country in the palm of their hands!

    And it'll all lead to a race of oil-slick aliens that can only be killed with a needle in the back of the neck before they seal their eyes and mouths with skin and...
    --

    1. Re:It's not the network's decision! by Photon+Ghoul · · Score: 1

      "You have offended my family, and you have offended a Shaolin temple."

      Are you sure that's not "the Shaolin temple"?

    2. Re:It's not the network's decision! by matrix29 · · Score: 1
      It was handed down from above, from men who know more than they let on! Men who hold the secrets of this country in the palm of their hands!

      MUST RESIST MASTURBATION JOKE... MUST RESIST...

      --
      "Face it, a nation that maintains a 72% approval rating on George W. Bush is a nation with a very loose grip on reality.
  56. Re:ya know... by beowulf · · Score: 1

    The big (supposed) surprise for this Sunday's episode of the X-files is that someone will die. My money is on Krychek (ok, I know I didn't spell his name right but whatever). It won't be Mulder, because Duchovney has said in interviews that his character will be back next season in an episode by episode basis (no over-riding commitment like this year's 11 out of 22), Gillian Anderson has next year to finish out her contract, and Robert Patrick and Annabeth Gish have both said they'll be back next year if asked. <p>What is really fun is that the guy who played the Cigarette Smoking Man (William B. Davis) has said that his character isn't dead. Chris Carter (again,based on what he said in a recent interview) has something going on with the story line that will set things up for another movie.
    The truth is out there...

  57. Re:It's all about the Family Guy by Miguelito · · Score: 1

    i just wonder if this show can possibly pull any ratings after being debuted, canceled, resurrected, disappearing, re-appearing, and then repeating the same cycle over again.

    Yeah, it definately bites how it got moved around.. but that's one arena where Tivo shines! I didn't miss a single episode, and still have a couple saved on mine that I reply now and then. :)

    --
    - My favorite error message: xscreensaver, running on an old Sparc 5 w/ 8bit color: bsod: Couldn't allocate color Blue
  58. Re:You need TiVo by ethereal · · Score: 1

    [slight Jamaican accent]

    thank you it was cold down there on the floor

    Caution: contents may be quarrelsome and meticulous!

    --

    Your right to not believe: Americans United for Separation of Church and

  59. Oh dear by Jethro · · Score: 2

    I can honestly say I can live without another Lone Gunmen series. It really wasn't THAT good, although funny at times. I had absolutely no respect for the guys after Lara Croft^W^W^WYves Adele Whatever kept screwing them over and bailing them out all the time - I mean, come on, the show's about THEM. If you're going to portray them as incompetent fools a-la Inspector Gadget (the original), do it. Don't give me half way we-can-hack-into-the-pengaton-but-a-chick-in-a-tig ht-outfit-can-totally-pull-a-sheep-over-our-eyes crap.

    It looked like that was going to change toward the end. Maybe it'd have got better.

    The thing that really bothers me is it ended with a cliffhanger. I hate not knowing what happened next!


    --

    --


    In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is kinky.
  60. Re:season finale by Photon+Ghoul · · Score: 1

    Turn your television off.

  61. Re:It's all about the Family Guy by Sloppy · · Score: 1

    [AOL]Me too.[/AOL]

    I think this just may have been the funniest TV show of all time. This one hurt me sometimes.


    ---
    --
    As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
  62. Lone Gunmen isn't X-Files by crow · · Score: 2

    The problem is the the Lone Gunmen show isn't at all like the scenes from the X Files with the Lone Gunmen.

    In the X Files, the Lone Gunmen were cool geeks. Sure, they were exaggerated, but if you can believe the government/alien conspiracies, you can easily accept that.

    I the Lone Gunmen show, the Lone Gunment were a geeky three stooges. Instead of being serious characters, they became funny. Humor is fine, but they went for forced sitcom humor. I don't want to watch a geek sitcom.

  63. Just a comment by QuietRiot · · Score: 1

    May I just say: "so what?"

    Not news for nerds.

  64. Why would anyone like X-Files? by Wee · · Score: 1
    What's to like? When I saw the first X-Files, I thought it was satire. It's probably the worst series ever produced for TV. It's worse than bad. It's not even bad-good. It's just plain bad. It's Sandra Bullock and The Net bad, not Bruce Campbell and Evil Dead bad.

    The plots are nonsensical, the characters one dimensional and the premise is completely absurd. Most science fiction is so far out there that it's not hard for one to suspend disbelief, and this is usually required (unless you're insane or some such). But the X-Files tried to be just on the edge of reality, yet had so many incongruities that disbelief was required. It's vey contradictory.

    I just never understood why anyone with more than two neurons to rub together would willingly watch the X-Files. I guess it's a matter of taste. Otherwise I'm stumped.

    -B

    --

    Ash and Hickory, straight-grained and true, make excellent bludgeons, dandy for the cudgeling of vegetarians.

    1. Re:Why would anyone like X-Files? by duplicate-nickname · · Score: 2
      ...and this coming from an Evil Dead fan? The only reason you like Evil Dead is because its *hip* to like it. Hell, you probably never heard of the movie until one of your friends told you about Army of Darkness. Lozer, go home!

      ÕÕ

      --

      ÕÕ

    2. Re:Why would anyone like X-Files? by Golias · · Score: 1
      I never considered X-Files to be a great show, but I think you are selling it a little short.

      When I saw the first X-Files, I thought it was satire...the premise is completely absurd.

      It is satire. Or, at the very least, escapist fantasy. They took the silliest stories that were showing up in the tabloids in the early 1990's, and created a setting where they were all true.

      If they were to go over the top and play if for laughs (like the "Men in Black" film), it might have been an okay comedy, but the appeal to it is that they play it straight. The actors behave like they are in an ordinary drama about FBI agents. For about 5 or 6 seasons, that made for some fairly amusing television.

      I am in the camp of people who thinks the show has really outlived its shelf-life, but if Fox wants to make it and some people want to watch it... that's fine by me. Nobody is forcing me to watch it.

      Oh, there is one other thing that people found appealing about the show: Gillian Anderson is hot enough to melt rocks.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

  65. Re:Gunmen (plural), not Gunman! by billybob · · Score: 1

    Wow, good to see we have moderators so fucking retarded that they moderate a post up to +5 informative that is ONLY correcting a grammatical error.

    WAY TO GO MODERATORS. YOU SURE SAVED THE FUCKING DAY.

    --
    Joseph?
  66. Re:Other TV shows list... [OT] by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

    > Here is a list of all the TV shows that will be cancelled or ending

    I kinda miss Jack of all Trades. It was really silly, but for some reason I always looked forward to seeing new episodes.

    I actually expected it to be pretty good once the writers found their stride. Alas; that won't happen now.

    --

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  67. Re:More stereotypes by cruelworld · · Score: 1

    Lost in space?

    he wasn't really evil....but....

  68. season finale by joekool · · Score: 1

    I hope that we at least get to see the season finale! as for those of you who stopped watching--shame on you, now what am I supposed to do on fridays, while I am stuck at work? oh wait, Dark Angel will be on then!..well what about on tuesday?...oh isn't that when the tick is on?... well, then..what about...wednsday? no..thursday?--no...monday?...what am I supposed to do on monday? watch allymacbeal/boston public? thank you, but just plain NO!

    --

    Slackware: old school feel, new school gear.
    1. Re:season finale by cybermage · · Score: 1

      I hope that we at least get to see the season finale!

      Friday's episode was the season finale. Unfortunately, it was done as a cliff-hanger. Joy. Perhaps they'll finish the story my having Doggett & Scully (or even Mulder) come to their rescue, since they were pretty much screwed. They can explain it all in an X-Files episode next season. I doubt Carter will stop using them and it's pretty unlikely that he'll use them again without some explaination of how they got out of the trouble they were in. With any luck, Yves will get shot, driving Jimmy to suicide and we'll just have the guys back.

      --

  69. ugh! by soop · · Score: 1

    Well once again we have a repeat of the usual axe intelligent shows, now sure geeks might cry and complain that it was technobabble and that it wasnt plausible yadda yadda, oh but live action tick is? oh well who cares ... I just rememebr the year they cancelled sea quest, my so called life and kept super man ... you tell me who makes these decisions? Stop polling trailerparks!

  70. I liked TLG by havoc · · Score: 1

    I thought it was a great idea to spin off the gunmen when I first heard about it. I was encouraged by the original commercials they ran. I was utterly disappointed when I witnessed the first episode. I gave it one more chance for the following episode and it got a little better. And the next episode a little better, and so on. I think the show was original and had some real potential. You can run a show for part of a season and then just cancel it! Characters, writers, and actors all need adequate time to find their nitch. Granted I think they needed to do more research into their technobable... but that could have come if it had been given time to mature.

    The Family Guy is not funny, sorry.

    The X-Files was fine up until season 5 or so. I was a big fan but just got tired of plots never being tied up and conspiracies never being revealed. This is a good example of a show that either needed to grow and change or be canceled.

    In my view, Babylon 5 is probably the greatest show that has ever graced the air waves. It was original, it had a vision, it had a dedicated run time. It presented basically what its creator wanted and then it ended. We may never see the ending to the season finally of The Lone Gunmen. Much like Gilligan stuck on the isle for so many years.

  71. Re:Neil Stephenson by Webmonger · · Score: 2

    True. But
    1) All == All
    2) the poster said all geeks who can write are boring. (He/she said most geeks can't write)
    3) Are you sure Stephenson doesn't translate? I reread Snow Crash recently, and it seemed very visual to me. (Not surprising, since it started as a graphic novel.)

  72. Neil Stephenson by Webmonger · · Score: 3

    Not all geek writers are boring.

    1. Re:Neil Stephenson by ShoeHead · · Score: 1

      Oh come on. You only like Snow Crash because

      A) The fat guy gets some
      B) Programmers save the day
      C) It bashes Christianity (in a way)

      Think about it, it's true.

    2. Re:Neil Stephenson by spinkham · · Score: 1

      Translate well to anime ;-)
      Watch Lain or Bubble Gum Crisis sometime..
      There's quite a lot of anime with similar themes to his writing...

      --
      Blessed are the pessimists, for they have made backups.
    3. Re:Neil Stephenson by BluedemonX · · Score: 2

      From the perspective of a media buyer, yes, all geeks who write are boring. You might find Asimov and Stephenson riveting, but the average slopehead would rather see the relatively more to-his-cerebral tastes Mad TV, or something. Whether or not something is visual or not is immaterial. Remember, Gibson wrote Aliens III, and they rejected it. Something about not having enough money on the planet to do the special effects he envisoned, or something. He was ranting on about the Aliens being some kind of death force to counteract the life force, whereas most people just wanted to see Jigglin' Sigourney waste some bugs.

      --

      --- Jump!! Fire!! Bullet time!! - Lego version of the Matrix
    4. Re:Neil Stephenson by BluedemonX · · Score: 3

      1) Most != All
      2) Stephenson, Gibson, etc. write interesting stuff, but it doesn't translate well to TV.

      --

      --- Jump!! Fire!! Bullet time!! - Lego version of the Matrix
  73. Yes! It's... the Ultimate Evil!!! by Smallest · · Score: 1

    every 2nd episode is... The Ultimate Anthropomorphic Evil form the Sewer! It drinks blood and can read your mind, but it looks just like you and me until night falls!

    could they be more predictable?

    even with mulder back, they can't do anything but Evil Lizard Man or Spooky Indian Death Eater Man.

    fuckin retards. (them for writing, me for watching)

    -c

    --
    I have discovered a truly remarkable proof which this margin is too small to contain.
  74. unfortunate by jgilbert · · Score: 1

    I'm sad to see it go. I had pretty much quit watching the X-Files when mulder went off and have only recently been watching with his return. The Lone Gunmen was my replacement. oh well. The mulder cameo in the last episode was nice.

    BTW, what the hell are they going to do to explain the season finally? probably nothing I guess.

    jason

  75. Re:I really like TLG by J+Story · · Score: 2

    I liked TLG, too. (My wife as well.)

    Sure, there was technical nonsense, but I have this sneaking suspicion that this was on purpose. With all the humour on the show -- others have posted about William Jefferson and TPOT Apes -- it's certainly plausible that a fun-poking target includes geekdom and its sometimes all-too-self-important inhabitants. I mean, seriously, is it even possible to have heard about Linux and *not* know that it's an operating system?

    Moreover, it seemed to me that the characters have been filling out in very interesting and amusing ways. (Who'd have guessed that the old guy was a champion Flamenco dancer, or that the blond guy has more than two brain cells?)

    It seems to be a phenomenon with my wife and me: the more we both enjoy a show, the more likely it is to get cancelled. (Fair Warning: CSI is looking interesting.)

  76. Re:Geek TV (the invisible man) by mako · · Score: 1

    For those who have the Sci-Fi channel The Invisible Man is a fantastic show. It is proof positive that a balance can be found between talking down to the audience and explaining things in a realistic manner. If you aren't a science nazi IM explains the things that happen in a somewhat believable and intelligent manner. I cannot recommend this show enough.

  77. Re:It's all about the Family Guy by Wah · · Score: 2

    i always wondered where the other 5 fans of the family guy had gotten to.

    here's one of them. And I know at least a few others use Bearshare, if you know what I mean. Don't let stupid network execs keep you from watching raunchy comedy. I hope they decide to order some more episodes, it was good stuff.
    --

    --
    +&x
  78. Re:It's all about the Family Guy by Wah · · Score: 2

    nah, I just have better things to do than watch commercials and wait until tuesday night at 7:00 p.m. EST to watch the programs I enjoy. Fool. Oh, and unless you read my comment as dripping with cynicism and sarcasm, you read it wrong.
    --

    --
    +&x
  79. B5 by chroma · · Score: 1

    EOM

    --

    Your design to a real part online: Big Blue Saw
  80. Re:More stereotypes by revscat · · Score: 1

    That guy from Ninja Scroll with the electric string. He was a flamer and was 2nd in command.

    'Course, that's anime. BUT to be honest white America has given up it's right to have gay villains. Too many people "hate fags" like people of similar dispositions used to (or still) "hate niggers." Don't want to encourage that behavior anymore. You don't see too many bad black guys, either. Or Cherokee. Or Navajo. Or Witchita. Etc.

    "BUT THAT'S SO UNFAIR!" Yeah well chock it up to the sins of the fathers being visited on their sons. Deal.

    If your still not satisfied I'll have you note that Pres. Bush speaks with a lisp. And he's an evil crime boss.

    [There! Now you can discount everything I've said because I'm a liberal!]

    - Rev.
    "Not a liberal."

  81. Re:It's all about the Family Guy by Tower · · Score: 1

    Amen to that - a great, funny cartoon. The lineup of Futureama, Family Guy and the Simpsons is nothing but gold... though it does make my sides hurt.
    --

    --
    "It's tough to be bilingual when you get hit in the head."
  82. HUZZAH for Family Guy! by Calcbert · · Score: 1

    I LOVE this show! It's all about the obscure and strange humor for me! Now I just have to remember to tape all the episodes...

  83. Re:Live action Tick? by Flounder · · Score: 2

    Almost forgot. Ninjas! Lots and Lots of Ninjas!

    --

    No boom today. Boom tomorrow. There's always a boom tomorrow. - Cmdr. Susan Ivanova

  84. Re:Why Lone Gunman Failed by Flounder · · Score: 2
    Lone Gunmen could have worked. They were geeks, just like us. Our lives are exciting enough for a weekly TV show.

    Counter-Strike, compile kernel, router down, All Your Base
    Action, suspense, drama, comedy

    --

    No boom today. Boom tomorrow. There's always a boom tomorrow. - Cmdr. Susan Ivanova

  85. Re:Live action Tick? by Flounder · · Score: 3
    What sweet honey is going to play American Maid?

    Because of some licensing issues, characters created for the cartoon series (American Maid, Die Fleidermaus, Sewer Urchin) will NOT be in the live action Tick. However, characters from the comic books can appear (even if they appeared in the cartoons also). And the pilot episode has the replacement characters, Lady Liberty and BatManuel

    I haven't seen the pilot, only the brief previews and pictures. I think this show will be awesome. It looks like we'll finally see a great comic to live action show. At least, until Spiderman comes out.

    All I want is a live action Chairface Chippendale! And Paul the Samurai! And Man Eating Cow! And The Chainsaw Vigilante! And Clark Oppenheimer!

    --

    No boom today. Boom tomorrow. There's always a boom tomorrow. - Cmdr. Susan Ivanova

  86. First Episode by keete · · Score: 1
    Funny, I thought the show peaked with the first episode.

    After you realize that the deus ex machina of "Ms Lee Harvey Oswald" is inevitable in every show, it really starts to grind. Did the show need such a painful, annoying and repetitive plot device?

    And why play down the main (title!) characters as jackasses? As seen on the X-Files, they may have been fringe but were not completely useless. Why place them in a show which should have been titled Doofus and the Annoying Superbitch? (a very competent and self-assured, to say nothing of contemptuous person who somehow has nothing better to do than the exact same whatever the lone gunmen happen to be doing.)

    On a related note, why hasn't Eve already made herself ruler of the world?

    A lot of potential wasted with this programme. Oh, and too much "flying finger single keystroke breaks into DOD" stuff.
    --

    --
    keete
  87. Fuck!!! Argh! by cr0sh · · Score: 2

    When I first heard that there was going to be a "Lone Gunmen" spinoff - I thought "Great! It might be a fun show..." - then I saw the preview trailers, and thought "Gah! They made it a comedy!" - and I didn't bother to watch it.

    Five weeks (and episodes) later, my SO brought home a tape she borrowed from a coworker - it had those five episodes on it - and I decided, "well, I will take a look"...

    The following week I began archiving the episodes, figuring I would dump them to MPEG at some point - and get the tape from that guy again to dump and make an mpeg of that...

    I love the show! It is campy - lot's of "in" jokes (esp in the pilot episode) that ONLY geeks would get. I hated when they brought in that "dumb guy" (Steve? Jeff?), but even he has his purpose, and I am beginning to see it. One of the recent episodes showed that their "base" of operations is a lot larger than x-files ever let on - it is warehouse size, with what seem to be apartments, or at least "sleepover" type rooms for those late nights.

    Now it is all going away...figures.

    Now I definitely have to get a copy of that tape, just so I can have all the episodes (I was hoping that after the season finali, provided they show it, that there was going to be re-runs, and I could catch the others that way - not a chance, now - and no chance for store tapes or anything).

    Damn!

    Worldcom - Generation Duh!

    --
    Reason is the Path to God - Anon
  88. Re:You need TiVo by M-G · · Score: 1

    I'm really sorry to see Fox pull the plug so damn fast

    Fox seems to be awfully quick in pulling the plug on shows the last couple of years. The show "Action" comes to mind.....

  89. Re:I really like TLG by M-G · · Score: 1

    Yep. TLG wasn't perfect, but I thought it was a pretty well done tongue-in-cheek kind of show. Plus, some of the crude humor was great: "We are so blown, and not in a good way".

    Oh well. Now on Fridays I can go to the bar until SVU is on....

  90. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  91. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  92. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  93. Re:Just goes to show... by superid · · Score: 4
    Yeah, there were some cheesy comments, and missing/incorrect detail for the anal, but IMHO the show and the characters had great potential. Cheers, WKRP in Cinnci, Barney Miller and most of the Treks were horrible until they had time to cook (stew? fester?) for a bit.


    SuperID

    Free Database Hosting

  94. This is why Red Dwarf kicks ass. by solios · · Score: 2

    And US TV does *not* (with very few exceptions).

    I caught the premier of the Lone Gunmen, whenever that was- it was the last time I watched TV outside of a bar. I laughed my ass off. The plot was so incredibly WEAK that it made an episode of the Golden Girls look like intense, nail-biting drama. I lost count of technical inaccuracies, fallacies and blatant lack of cluefulness before the second commercial break kicked in. The characters are supposedly the creme de la creme of geeks.... do you really think you could hit that audience with gross misuse of buzzwords and terminology? No.

    Star Trek loses me hear as well- the show really should be billed as a fantasy, rather than science fiction. Warp Drive may be mathematically feasable, but the fact that you couldn't follow a tech-heavy episode without a manual- and the fact that they relied on some sort of jury-rigged fix to save them half the time (which was promptly forgotten the next episode or show- why hasn't Voyager simply found one of the damned Transwarp Conduits from mid-series TNG and rocketed back home? Or asked a big one of Q?) and explained it in terms that would enrage and offend a scientist totally turned me off. Or Neelix, which is many ways worse.

    This brings me to the Saviour of watchable Sci-Fi- Red Dwarf. The show gets most of its science fact correct- the ship itself is a sound concept and one could dig up details on the math behind it if they felt like it. It doesn't over-rely on tech explanations to save the day, and the characters are pretty much idiots when it comes to tech anyway... it *is* a comedy, after all... anyone who's sick of network suck and hasn't heard of Dwarf would do themselves a favor to check it out. Or Doctor Who... or the Prisoner....

    1. Re:This is why Red Dwarf kicks ass. by Arricc · · Score: 1

      That would be the UK vesion of Dwarf... The US version sucks so badly, even I don't find it funny - and I've been known to laugh at absolute crap.

  95. Lone Gunmen is Fantastic! by Local+Loop · · Score: 2

    What are all you guys complaining about? The Lone Gunmen is a great show! The characters are fantastic, breaking stereotypes and being multi dimensional as well.

    It's the best TV show since Babylon 5. And the storylines are original and interesting

    As for the tech not being perfect, who cares? TV isn't about tech, it's about character and story. Haven't you ever heard of artistic license?

    You geeks need to get a life. Not every story has to read like a Cisco technical manual.

    -Loopy

    1. Re:Lone Gunmen is Fantastic! by spinkham · · Score: 1

      The tech is better then normal fair anyway..
      Watch "Dark angel" for a really bad look at tech..
      That show sucks more in every way, and it's doing better then Lone Gunmen.. Don't get it...

      --
      Blessed are the pessimists, for they have made backups.
    2. Re:Lone Gunmen is Fantastic! by MagusX · · Score: 1
      well, based on what I've seen of this week's episode of Dark Angel, I've got three words to describe it's success:
      "Young Horny Chick"

      --
  96. Re:/. doesn't like X-Files? by Cy+Guy · · Score: 2

    "X-Files" has actually gotten good again over the past few months.

    Do you mean over the last few months where Mulder returned? SInce Mulder won't be back next year, I think everyone is dreading the samething I am, another season along the lines of Fall '00 episodes wher we have Scully as the believer (aka Mulder standin) and T2-guy as the skeptic (aka early Scully standin), minus all the sexual tension between Scully and Mulder.

    They have run through all of the major thread of the X-files (actually probably more than once at this point) which basically leaves them with the monster of the week shows, which frankly, Special Unit 2 was doing better this season since they at least have the sexual tension between the leads.

  97. Casting by The+Queen · · Score: 3

    El Seed? Who cares? I want to know who the hell can pull off Chairface Chippendale without the use of CG??! :-)

    "Smear'd with gumms of glutenous heat, I touch..." - Comus, John Milton

    --

    The House Between - Original Sci-Fi Series
  98. Re:Just goes to show... by Field+Marshall+Stack · · Score: 1
    Ah well... anyone else curious about the new Tick show?

    I was able to find a copy of the pilot on gnutella a while back... it wasn't terribly impressive. Puddy from Seinfeld plays the big blue guy, and does a decent job, but the writing is, well, it's not what I expected. First of all, the Tick swears. That's... just... not... right... man. Second, they weren't able to use Die Fleidermaus or American Maid, due to some weird licensing issue. They've been replaced by Batmanuel and Captain Liberty, who have more of a love/hate relationship than the (IMO funnier) hate/hate relationship between D.F. and A.M.

    I dunno, they might be able to pull a decent series out of this, but I'm not counting on it.
    --
    "HORSE."

    --
    "HORSE."
    -Flaming Carrot
  99. Why Lone Gunman Failed by citizenc · · Score: 2

    The Lone Gunman filed simply because the writers tried to expand characters that were originally created for a supporting role into full-blown characters. There simply wasn't enough .. ahem .. meat to them.

    ---

  100. Re:More stereotypes by Chasuk · · Score: 1

    I would like to see a show on network television where gay characters are depicted in the same manner as straight characters; i.e., without any reference to their sexuality. Most of the time, in real life, it isn't relevant, so why should it be important in a sitcom?

    I'm a bisexual male, and my sexuality doesn't come up in everyday life, ever. I am not introduced by my friends as "This is Chas, 40, left-handed, bisexual," any more than my straight friends are introduced with such descriptions.

    Maybe if we ignore the sterotypes we will help them go away.

  101. Spoooo by ffatTony · · Score: 1

    oooooooooooon!

    The tick was one of my favorite cartoons. I look forward to seeing it again. My only concern is how they will find an actor muscular (and tall) enough to play the Tick, but I'll certainly watch!

    On an off-topic note: Slashdot owners it would be really nice if you implemented a spell-check button, perhaps with a popup window telling me which words I mispelled. *Just a thought.*


    Jon Katz? Didn't he set up us the bomb?

  102. Oblongs, Oblongs by sspiff · · Score: 2

    The best show you've never seen has also been shitcanned due to abysmal ratings.

    Unlike The Simpsons, it was actually funny.

  103. my two cents by joq · · Score: 2


    On the X Files the guys rocked because it was something new. With their own show we expected to see something as serious as the X Files in the form of the hackers which never happened. Comedy? The show flat out sucked, and it was surprising it lasted as long. Same happened with Level 9 which aired for about 4 weeks that I know of. For those who never even heard of it, it was supposed to be I guess what people think the NSA are, a bunch of hacker crime fighters which never materialzed.

    I watched that show once or twice till I heard them say "his website WHATEVERTHENAMEWAS.com is untraceable, he keeps moving IP address." or something along that line, and quickly thought "stupid ass clueless producers don't even do research."

    Family Guy is funny as hell tho' Stewie just owns.

    Sad to see the Lone Gunmen go, maybe Chris Carter will script them into X-Files a bit more since they do have that role under lock down. But by themselves... they're boring.

    Lone Gunman

  104. Other sources ? by BorgDrone · · Score: 1

    Are there other sources to get my weekly Lone Gunman fix ?
    ---

    1. Re:Other sources ? by BorgDrone · · Score: 1

      Well I do get my episodes from the internet, but what I mean is are there other channels that air TLG, cause these guys need to capture the show from somewhere :)
      ---

    2. Re:Other sources ? by The+Pump · · Score: 1

      Hopefully, Chris Carter will release the sources to the Lone Gunmen under the GPL, or equivalent free software license. Then we can all share in the warmth of free software!

      Oh, that Cris Carter! I thought he was going to buy the Minnesota Vikings?

  105. What's wrong with the family guy? by BMonger · · Score: 1

    Everybody I know loves the family guy. Absolutely loves it. I think it is *the* funniest show I've seen to date. It was cut because people didn't like it I suppose although I am very glad it's coming back. I'm just curious why people didn't like the family guy so if any of you didn't like it... why?

    Also as far as x-files is concerned I stopped watching it at the beginning of this season. The reason? Not beacuse little Mulder... it was because I purchased season one on DVD. I spent ~$100 on an awesome set of DVD's but have I watched it? nope. So I figure I'll watch em when it comes out on DVD.

  106. Is this, News for American Couch Potatoes. by Shanep · · Score: 1

    Stuff that I don't give a fuck about?

    X-Files rings a bell though. So what am I missing out on?

    --
    War crimes, torture, lies, illegal spying... Would someone give Bush a blowjob, already, so he can be impeached?
  107. Re:Yeah, The Tick! by redinger · · Score: 1

    It's time to deply the middle child!

  108. Killing The Tick? by redinger · · Score: 1

    Regardless of how you feel about the actual shows themselves, I think this timeslot is horrible for the Tick. Putting it up against Survivor & whatever is on "Must See TV" at the time is a bad move. Since Survivor was the most watched, and Friends was the most taped, what's that leave for the Tick? Just us loyal fans and all the Tivo owners.

    On another note, I don't get it, if Fox Kids owns the rights to lots of cool made-for-cartoon characters, why wouldn't they license them to a show that is going to be on Fox?? That could only help matters. I mean, what's the show going to be like without Speak!, or Little Wooden Boy, or even Bi-Polar Bear for that matter?

  109. Freaks & Geeks ruled (+DVD rumor) by smirkleton · · Score: 2

    "Freaks and Geeks" was truly one of the greatest hour-long shows of the past decade.

    If they make DVDs available (currently rumored to be coming through A&E), I hope ThinkGeek would step up and add them to a DVD section on their site. It seems like such a perfect fit. (I was glad to see a lament of the series cancellation in the Demotivators 2001 calendar Thinkgeek is selling...)

    "Freaks and Geeks" should be mandatory viewing for slashdot folk, since it was so bloody dead-on about the formulative years of geekdom...

    D&D episodes... Atari episodes... Model rocketry episodes... And the band STYX in constant rotation! My life flashed before my eyes, and then got cancelled by some bonehead and replaced with a who-wants-to-be-a-millionaire-knockoff...

    (sigh)

  110. Re:And you Americans still complain by Stonehand · · Score: 1

    The original versions often really, really stink. With luck, the worst of those die off before they can cross the Atlantic to you.

    I'm not sure you're missing much, except perhaps PBS programs; I don't know whether you can get _Frontline_ and so forth.

    --
    Only the dead have seen the end of war.
  111. Re:Just goes to show... by scoove · · Score: 3

    Sadly, ever area I develop any competency in, it ruins tv and movies that ever reference that subject matter.

    Take any show with someone playing an instrument, or god forbid, conducting an orchestra/band. I can just hear the director instructing the actor:

    "OK. Now you're going to conduct the band. Just get up there and flop your arms about madly for awhile. Isn't that what they do anyways?"

    Makes me want to direct movies. "OK. Get up there and act real serious now. Camera guy, make sure you turn the camera on and shoot while this happens. Just make sure they're good pictures"

    Don't even get me started on journalists... I've yet to have a quote read as it was actually spoken... (advice: record your interview - it might just save your butt someday)

    *scoove*

  112. Re:Great TV returns! by RedX · · Score: 2

    I agree. Family Guy is fantastic, but has been screwed by FOX with the way it was moved around, yanked from the lineup every couple of weeks and then for this entire past season. Even in renewal, it gets screwed by being placed in a timeslot where it has no chance, opposite Friends and Survivor. I'll certainly be duethanks to the fact that very few others will be watching.

  113. Re:It's all about the Family Guy by dimator · · Score: 1

    Family Guy is just stupid funny. Rare is the show that makes me collapse on the floor from laughter.

    I hope there's some chance that, if fox cancels it, someone else will pick it up. Like maybe comedy central; all their shows, except for the daily show, suck anyways...


    --

    --
    python -c "x='python -c %sx=%s; print x%%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))%s'; print x%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))"
  114. Just goes to show... by decipher_saint · · Score: 4
    You just can't make a T.V. series for geeks without doing your homework. The writers just applied the use of Treckbabble to modern technology and I wince every time the characters try to explain something ("My cookies are comprimised..." ugh!).

    Ah well... anyone else curious about the new Tick show?

    -----

    --
    crazy dynamite monkey
    1. Re:Just goes to show... by biglig2 · · Score: 1

      Ah, well, Orson Welles used to say that any reasonably intelligent person could learn the mechanics of directing a feature film over a weekend.

      --
      ~~~~~ BigLig2? You mean there's another one of me?
    2. Re:Just goes to show... by coolgeek · · Score: 2
      Obviously, not all of us _get_ The Lone Gunmen. Take a little Vaudeville, mix in some elitist fun-poking at a technophobic society that believes _everything_ it reads, sprinkle with some hot chicks, and there you have it. The way it "reaches the geeks" are the impossible things that transpire. We know at the same time, millions of the clueless not only believe it will happen, their spare moments are occupied thinking about how they will respond when it does happen.

      Hack the flight control system of a commercial airliner and land it. =) Not over the phone...

      --

      cat /dev/null >sig
    3. Re:Just goes to show... by Jebediah21 · · Score: 1

      I think the Gunmen show could have worked if it had a different tone. Their is/was a big difference between the appearences by the Lone Gunmen on the X-Files and their own show. It seemed like the whole mood had changed, and part of what made the Lone Gunmen interesting on the X-Files was that mood.

      --

      Everytime you look at porn a devil gets their horns.
    4. Re:Just goes to show... by BluedemonX · · Score: 2

      The thing about Survivor IV: Boot Camp on Temptation island is that like Cops, Cannibal Pets Attack part IV, whatever...

      They get FAT ratings, and they're cheap to make. Let's face it, the participants are HOPING to win $1,000,000. On some shows *cough FRIENDS cough* they expect that per actor per episode.

      --

      --- Jump!! Fire!! Bullet time!! - Lego version of the Matrix
    5. Re:Just goes to show... by UberLame · · Score: 1

      Because, if you tell headquarters where you are going, they will tell you not to go there. Just like the way you don't tell your mom your going out to get drugs.

      --
      I'm a loser baby, so why don't you kill me.
    6. Re:Just goes to show... by sparcv9 · · Score: 2

      Cheers, WKRP in Cinnci, Barney Miller and most of the Treks were horrible until they had time to cook (stew? fester?) for a bit.
      Yes, but those all aired back before the prevalence of cable television. Now the Networks have to compete with 500 other channels, rather than just each other. If something is getting low ratings, they pull it and replace it with a rip-off of another network's most popular shows. Did we really need Survivor/Survivor II/Temptation Island/Boot Camp/etc? Now we even have a game show where contestants vote each other off!

      End result: a never-ending parade of lowest-common-denominator crap.
      --

      This is not a Fugazi .sig
    7. Re:Just goes to show... by sparcv9 · · Score: 2

      Now we even have a game show where contestants vote each other off! Isn't that what Survivor is????
      The TV Networks refer to Survivor and Boot Camp as "Reality Shows" or somesuch (even though MTV's The Real World fits that name better.) By "game show", I was referring to The Weakest Link. It's a quiz show where the contestants vote each other out of the game. Same concept as Survivor, but you don't have to eat rats and it's over in 30 minutes, rather than a dozen episodes.
      --

      This is not a Fugazi .sig
    8. Re:Just goes to show... by matrix29 · · Score: 1

      What?!? And all this time I thought THE WEAKEST LINK was a dating service for the bisexual nymphomanic dominatrix hostess.

      Hostess: "Can you explain why you couldn't answer the last question?!? You are THE WEAKEST LINK!"

      And the losers are sent to the spanking box while the winners get a full night of bondage sex which will debut on the next episode of HBO - AFTER DARK's "REAL SEX".

      --- What the heck have you been watching?

      --
      "Face it, a nation that maintains a 72% approval rating on George W. Bush is a nation with a very loose grip on reality.
    9. Re:Just goes to show... by mighty_mallards · · Score: 2

      The best TV series I've seen for geeks was Freaks and Geeks, which is currently showing in reruns on some cable channel (I think it's Fox Family). That show was the best!!

      --
      You find this humorous, centurion?
    10. Re:Just goes to show... by J3zmund · · Score: 1

      There's nothing REAL about the Real World. If you want reality television without the setups, it's COPS.

      --

      It's all Hood
    11. Re:Just goes to show... by Salieri · · Score: 2

      It reminds me of some of the blabbering that went on between writers and directors in the recent Hollywood strike threat. It got pretty nasty at some points... and also pretty silly. Like in an editorial I read in a writer's magazine that said -- in what appeared to be all seriousness -- that the best solution for writers is to just direct themselves. How hard can it be? Let the DP (director of photography) and his friends take care of all the tech stuff. Just get up there, tell your actors to do funny things with your script, and shoot away!

      --------------------------------

    12. Re:Just goes to show... by McSpew · · Score: 1

      Maybe I'm just a dimwit, but I didn't mind the odd technodrivel they threw in. What I really loved, and apparently nobody else did, was that they had all sorts of incredibly subtle jokes in their stories.

      Two examples come to mind. The first was a storyline about a married politician who fathered a child with a female campaign worker. The woman wound up dying under mysterious circumstances, which the guys decided to investigate. The politician they were investigating had the last name of Jefferson and his baby's name was William. For those who don't pay attention to such things, Bill Clinton's full name is William Jefferson Clinton. That was a very subtle dig at ol' Willy the Zipper.

      The other example which comes to mind is in the episode with the super-intelligent chimp. The chimp sends them an email from the Boulle Institute. For those who don't know, Planet of the Apes was written by Pierre Boulle.

      These were very subtle elements to the show. Probably too subtle. I think I might be one of 10 people in the world who caught the Pierre Boulle reference.

    13. Re:Just goes to show... by Publicus · · Score: 1

      The last episode I saw was the one with the super-intelligent chimpanzee. He was getting his little text to speech app up on one of their laptops and the guy with the long hair said "What language is that?" The guy in the suit responded: "It's Linux."

      Ugh!

      --

      My Karma was at 49, then they switched to words. All that work for nothing!

  115. Re:Mindless Ramblings by bjorky · · Score: 1

    The Family Guy is the funniest. Weren't there problems with voice-actors finding other jobs, however? Someone have a link?

    Family guy was put on hiatus because the creator didn't think it was going to be renewed, but it actually did quite well in the ratings... the only problem was, because he thought it wasn't going to be renewed, he had no new episodes ready. Rather than run the same reruns over and over and get people sick of the show, they slated it to be a mid-season replacement, but that got pushed back because of the possible writer's strike. According to Planet Family Guy it'll be back on in the fall.

    -----

    --

    "Defenestration" is to throw out of a window; what's a word for throwing 'Windows' out of something?
  116. Gunmen (plural), not Gunman! by antdude · · Score: 5

    Yahoo's article has the title spelling wrong.

    Don't believe me? Try visiting the official Web site. :)

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  117. Other TV shows list... [OT] by antdude · · Score: 5

    http://www.pazsaz.com/cancel.html

    Here is a list of all the TV shows that will be cancelled or ending (i.e. The Lone Gunmen is included).

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    1. Re:Other TV shows list... [OT] by tb3 · · Score: 1

      I'm gonna miss Seven Days, I was sure I'd heard they renewed it. They built themselves a very small box to work in and wrote some really clever stories inside that box.*Sigh*
      -----------------

      --

      www.lucernesys.comHorizon: Calendar-based personal finance

  118. HOME MOVIES by AugstWest · · Score: 2

    Goddammit, Family Guy is funny and all, but somebody needs to pick up Home Movies. It was genius.

  119. The Tick by szcx · · Score: 2
    There's some information about the show including photos of the characters here.

    Enjoy!

  120. Re:It's all about the Family Guy by puppet10 · · Score: 2

    It might be partially due to ratings but I've heard that it was also due to a large number of advertisers pulling out (some links) due to the pull no punches humor.

    I loved the 5 minute rant on Canada at the end of one of the episodes, freakin' hillarious.

    --
    -------- This space intentionally left blank --------
  121. Re:I really like TLG by LordNimon · · Score: 1

    You need to travel around the USA some more. The people on these shows outnumber people like us in real life by a factor of 10-to-1.
    --
    Lord Nimon

    --
    And the men who hold high places must be the ones who start
    To mold a new reality... closer to the heart
  122. Re:I really like TLG by LordNimon · · Score: 1
    Friday night is our big TV night. Well, I guess it was until just recently. We used to have: The Fugitive, Stargate SG-1, Outer Limits, Farscape, and Invisible Man. Some of these shows have moved around, but there's still plenty to watch.

    Besides, schedules mean nothing to me, now that I have a TiVo. I highly recommend you get one.
    --
    Lord Nimon

    --
    And the men who hold high places must be the ones who start
    To mold a new reality... closer to the heart
  123. I really like TLG by LordNimon · · Score: 2
    Apparently I hold the minority opinion here, but my wife and I really liked The Lone Gunman (I'm a geek, she's not, but she likes geek humor). I don't remember the premier too well, but I don't recall thinking it sucked. It certainly was good enough for me to want to watch more.

    For me, the X-Files is the only show on Fox worth watching. I hate TV shows about "dumb, average people", so I can't stand Simpsons, Family Guy, etc.
    --
    Lord Nimon

    --
    And the men who hold high places must be the ones who start
    To mold a new reality... closer to the heart
    1. Re:I really like TLG by tuxlove · · Score: 1

      I hate TV shows about "dumb, average people", so I can't stand Simpsons, Family Guy, etc.

      Yeah, but these are shows about "really dumb, below-average people".

  124. Great TV returns! by D.+Mann · · Score: 2

    Family Guy is one of the single best television shows in years. The gags are all on-target, although it's a little crude at times. It definitely ranks up there with "The Simpsons" and "Futurama" as one of my favorite animated shows.

    The humor is a little divergent from "The Simpsons" and "Futurama," though. The Simpsons tends to be more satirical (or used to), while Futurama is a little more sight gag/pun oriented.

    Family Guy's approach is different. It just throws crude and offensive material at you until you can't help laughing.

    If Fox dumped "King of the Hill" (funny, but not side-splittingly so) and replaced it with Family Guy, my ass would be glued to the couch from 7 to 10 pm every Sunday. (Fox lineup until 9, then the Sopranos on HBO)

    1. Re:Great TV returns! by Geekboy(Wizard) · · Score: 1

      Family Guy is going to be opposite Friends!?! YAY!!!! I hate Friends, and Survivor. Now my gf and our roommates can watch Friends, and I'll watch Family Guy (rather than try to convince one of them to watch it with the other so I can play PlayStation)

    2. Re:Great TV returns! by JordoCrouse · · Score: 1

      Even in renewal, it gets screwed by being placed in a timeslot where it has no chance, opposite Friends and Survivor.

      Yeah, like Fox cares about that....

      Anyway, thats a dead timeslot. At least they are trying to put something worth watching on, unlike the other networks when they are up against an unbeatable program.

      Ever seen any of the crap that CBS and NBC try to put up against Monday Night Football? At least they could *try* to grab some of the non football crowd.

      --
      Do you have Linux and a DotPal? Click here now!
    3. Re:Great TV returns! by update() · · Score: 1
      Family Guy is one of the single best television shows in years.

      I'm with you -- I think it was the best show since Get A Life.

      Unsettling MOTD at my ISP.

  125. Re:Sad, But Maybe for the Best by Vinson+Massif · · Score: 2

    odd. I kind of liked the premier and got turned completely off the show when they added, and almost completely focused the show on, the Doofus-Guy. It seemed to me that the 1st episode was done, then Hollywood got hold of it, couldn't understand the anti-hero slant and bolted the 4th guy on.

    --
    "Remember, any tool can be the right tool." -- Red Green
  126. Re:Yeah, The Tick! by biglig2 · · Score: 1

    Fox's page has photos:

    http://www.newenglandcomics.com/ticktv.shtml

    --
    ~~~~~ BigLig2? You mean there's another one of me?
  127. There is no spoon! :-( by Nonesuch · · Score: 1

    Too bad nobody here is showing reruns of the animated series...

  128. Re:And you Americans still complain by Nonesuch · · Score: 2
    You want to watch American TV with the original soundtracks? Get yourself a fast connection and find an archive of these shows in DiVX format.

    Any show that has a rabid fan base will have somebody who puts the time and effort into capturing the episodes, encoding them, and finding sites to host the files.

    Or wait a few years and buy the episodes on DVD, such as the X-files sets just now coming out.

  129. RPM explained by Mr2001 · · Score: 1
    http://www.hansprestige.com/rpm/

    RPM is a dastardly language, and it's essentially write-only. The code in my signature reverses a string. You'll find the necessary information and binaries at the above URL (binaries are for Windows, sorry... though they're probably portable with Kylix).

    ]$`};L(;/proc);[I(;];<C{;};1S[;`\/while=1E1L[`\p roc{>=

    --
    Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
  130. It's all about the Family Guy by Mr2001 · · Score: 3
    I loved that show.. I'm more than happy to trade some X-Files spinoff for one of the best cartoons ever.

    ]$`};L(;/proc);[I(;];<C{;};1S[;`\/while=1E1L[`\p roc{>=

    --
    Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    1. Re:It's all about the Family Guy by big_cat79 · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't count on the Family Guy being around for a while though. Fox is going to bury it on Thursday's at 8, which of course puts it up against Survivor and Friends. Seems like they are setting them up for failure.
      BigCat79

      --

      BigCat79

      "The dead have risen and are voting Republican!" --Bart Simpson
    2. Re:It's all about the Family Guy by Cardhore · · Score: 1

      No doubt. Family Guy was the funniest show.

    3. Re:It's all about the Family Guy by DarkSun_3_16 · · Score: 1

      Yes, yes, yes!!! Family Guy is such a tremendously funny show, and Stewie rules!

      --
      Chaos is the order of the day...
    4. Re:It's all about the Family Guy by grievous · · Score: 1

      i always wondered where the other 5 fans of the family guy had gotten to.

      i just wonder if this show can possibly pull any ratings after being debuted, canceled, resurrected, disappearing, re-appearing, and then repeating the same cycle over again.

      then again, it doesn't look like fox can kill it - got to wonder if the guy who created it has some compromising photos of rupert murdoch.

    5. Re:It's all about the Family Guy by BurningChr0me · · Score: 1

      I fail to see how anyone at all could find that cartoon anything but annoying. Its never made me laugh, the whole kid genius thing is old and trite, and its supposed humor just isn't there. I don't write this from a "its not intellgent enough" or "geeky" enough pov either. SouthPark used to make me laugh my ass off, so its not that its "crude" either. Its just not funny.

  131. The Lone Gunmen were cool when they were lone by BierGuzzl · · Score: 2

    Bringing them into the spotlight took away what made them special. They were no longer 3 social misfits with some tech know-how who'd stumbled on some secret fbi stuff. The whole reason people liked them to start off with was that they _weren't_ the center of attention. Who understands nerds as the protagonists of a show? Unless it's satire, like in Revenge of the nerds it's just not accepted.

  132. The Tick! by Codex+The+Sloth · · Score: 1

    I don't see how it can be good. The clips I have seen stunk and I'm sure it will be dumbed down. The real question is why the original cartoon went off the air -- it was great! My favorite was the "Ants in Pants" episode -- they'll never have a live action episode like that. Those bastards!

    --
    I am not a number! I am a man! And don't you ... oh wait, I'm #93427. Ha ha! In your face #93428!
  133. Re:What happend in the season finale of TLG??????? by cybrpnk · · Score: 1

    In a nutshell, Morris (? - the Man In Black) was running the whole thing as a scam to find / get Eve and tricked out heros plus Eve to show up at an underground vault holding the Holy Grail Database. They were all captured by the SWAT team from the beginning of the episode. To be continued....

  134. Re:More stereotypes by SaxMaster · · Score: 1

    Has anyone aside from me seen Boondock Saints? This was a very cool movie, but the reason I bring it up is Willem Dafoe's character. He's a brilliant FBI organized crime investigator who turns out to be gay, but in the most un-stereotypical way ever. They literally had to show him in bed after sex with another man for you to know. This is how anti-stereotype his character is. Not to mention some bloody BRILLIANT lines. He's sitting at a gay bar, and the VERY fruity bartender says "I'm sorry, i think you've had enough sir." Willem responds "Just pour me the drink, fairy" in a mean, deadpan. It's the funniest thing because every other guy in the bar gives him the most surprised "gay look" I've ever seen. I almost died laughing :) But definately a great movie with a brilliant Dafoe performance. One other reason I enjoyed his performance so much, especially from the "anti stereotype" position is because I'm friends with or am acquainted with enough gay people to see each end of the spectrum. Some of my friends are almost comically stereotypical, and some are not. Most are in the middle :)
    Just some food for thought :)

    --
    "Dancing is the vertical expression of a horizontal desire" --Robert Frost
  135. Frankly... by Legion303 · · Score: 1
    The Lone Gunmen was starting to get on my nerves. Every other episode had someone wearing what looked like an orthodontic retainer that changed their voice (complete with poor lip-synching), and the writers seemed to use whatever convenient and lazy way they could come up with to bring the woman with the British accent into the show. There were one or two decent episodes in there, but in the end, I'm more disappointed with the cancellation of Moesha (rimshot) than I am with that of TLG.

    I just wish Chris Carter could come up with something other than the X-Files that doesn't bomb immediately like his last two series did.

    -Legion

  136. Lone gunmen, what the....? by Delrin · · Score: 1

    I never knew there could be a spinoff of a spinoff. what a terrible idea.

  137. Re:Fox has exactly two good shows: by UnifiedTechs · · Score: 1

    Make That 3.... Can't forget Dark Angel!!!!!!!!!

  138. ... not to mention the geek viewers themselves.. by T.Hobbes · · Score: 1

    I'm a geek (I think..), and I stopped watching the program after the first episode. More because I've grown tired of the x-files, and the pilot wasn't .. ah.. 'good'. Anyway, the fickle-nes s of geeks is probably contributes to the phenomenon.

    Linus has,in fact,grown,and explosively-JonKatz

  139. FOX's Dream Lineup by Viking+Coder · · Score: 1
    If I were King For A Day, this would be FOX's Sunday lineup :

    6:00 - Futurama
    6:30 - The Family Guy
    7:00 - The Simpsons
    7:30 - The Tick
    8:00 - Malcolm In The Middle
    8:30 - King Of The Hill
    9:00 - The X-Files

    With this lineup, FOX would own my eyes from 6:00 until 8:00 every time, and sometimes until 9:00.

    In my opinion, The Family Guy is the funniest show on television. Futurama is hilarious, and The Simpsons is almost always good for a few laughs - especially the Halloween shows. I'm looking forward to The Tick, and I hope I can just grin and bear it through the name and persona changes for American Maid and Die Fledermause. Patrick Warburton (?) (soon to be The Tick) was the voice of a guard in The Emperor's New Clothes, as a large goofy guy (much like The Tick), and he was great in that role. I think The Tick has a real chance of being good. I can't wait for the return of The Family Guy, and the premier of The Tick!

    --
    Education is the silver bullet.
  140. Fat-slob comedy is dead? by Viking+Coder · · Score: 1
    Wait a minute, you say "Fat-slob comedy is dead..." and you've got a quote from Curtis Armstrong in the role of Charles De Mar (who is a fat-slob) from the movie Better Off Dead...? Is it dead, not-funny, and not-worth-quoting, or not-dead, funny, and worth-quoting? Which is it, Teahouse? *grins*

    By the way, I think that The Family Guy is only derivative of The Simpsons in that it's a cartoon with a fat guy. I mean, let's call The Simpsons derivative of FAT ALBERT. *chuckles*

    The Family Guy is hilarious. It's truly inventive, and it's got Adam West - freaking Batman - as the voice of the Mayor. What more do you need? Oh, crap - I almost forgot - Norm Macdonald as Death was incredible. And Seth Green - Scott Evil - as Chris Griffin! This show is awesome - don't listen to Teahouse - check it out if you haven't seen it already. Just be prepared to be offended. *grins*

    "Holy crip, he's a crapple!" -Peter Griffin

    --
    Education is the silver bullet.
  141. Not quite... by 11thangel · · Score: 1

    Actually, thanks to some last minute changes in the script of the premiere by some not-so-well-known hackers, it was us geeks who made THEM look stupid =) Yeah, right. Back to that shitty reality with nothing to do formerly known as friday night. /me waits for another cheap parody like the star trek cast shooting phasers at the executives until they took the props away

    --

    I am !amused.
  142. Rosencrantz and Gildenstern by Charles+Gaudette · · Score: 1

    I found humor in compairing the Lone Gunmen and X-Files to Rosencrantz & Gildenstern and Hamlet. This linkage was so obvious to me that I'll have to watch the reruns for such a sub-plot.

  143. Re:More stereotypes by Rand+Race · · Score: 1
    It's not that NS is anime, it's that it's a movie not a TV show. Note how the recent TV version of The Magnificent Seven for all practical purposes omitted the 'Lee' character (Can't remember the actors name... you know, the Man from UNCLE guy) because he's a quite unsavory homosexual character (homicidal, lisps, anti-social, drug addict) even though he's a protagonist.

    You want unsavory queers on TV, get ye to Star Trek. Granted they are all lesbians (alas, perhaps Riker won't screw any sophont in existence) but definately evil. Kes kissed a girl when taken over by some evil alien, and on DS9 Kira and Dax II's evil mirror universe versions are gay. Also note Beverly Crushers revolted (and revolting) reaction to her Trill lover's slug being transplanted into a female. For a people so much more advanced socially than us, they seem to view derivation from norms as unacceptable. Typical neo-liberals (ie not liberals at all, just the reactionary left).

    I had a point somewhere but lost it. To bad...

    --
    Insanity is the last line of defence for the master diplomat. But you have to lay the groundwork early.
  144. Thank god........... by crivens · · Score: 1

    Thank god for that - it was a terrible show. Bad characters, bad script and dreadful storyline. And just to make things worse, I caught part 1 of the XFiles season finale, and I thought that was bad too. Flame away, but I'm serious.

  145. Re:This prolly means... by Master+Bait · · Score: 2
    That's OK, it sucked. The only good thing on tv anymore is Croc Hunter. Isn't she a beeeuuuuutie!


    blessings,

    --
    "Only in their dreams can men truly be free 'twas always thus, and always thus will be."
    --Tom Schulman
  146. This prolly means... by garbs · · Score: 1

    That none of us Aussies will ever get to see this show, unless of course it's been on tv without me knowing about it.

    Oh well...

    --

  147. Fox missing X-files precident, and other errors by afflatus_com · · Score: 2
    X-files in its debut season wasn't watched by many, it was 2-3 years before the storm really picked up. X-files did have better writing to its benefit. But the premise of Lone Gunmen was good, and at least something slightly different than the rest of current television. There is unlikely something better that fox can come up with to replace it...perhaps a situation comedy with a bunch of urban 30 somethings getting into all kinds of crazy hijinx, or a new show following the highs and lows of a fake emergency ward, or maybe a staged quiz show where contenstants can vote each other out.

    This is reminiscent of Fox's pulling of "Get A Life", which was by far and away the most creative sitcom of its time, and just replacing it with crap emulating things that were on TV elsewhere. Get A Life episodes are now out on DVD, for people to see what television can be before Fox pulls the plug on innovation.

    ---
    "And the beast shall be made legion. Its numbers shall be increased a thousand thousand fold."

    --

    -----
    Cast a Cold Eye
    On Life, on Death
    Horseman, pass by
    --W.B. Yeats' gravestone
  148. The original ep was Good! by bolthole · · Score: 1

    i LIKED the original episode. It was something NEW on tv.
    I was looking forward to an actual techie series. With a lot of
    "mission impossible" type stuff with frohike.

    But then My jaw dropped on the second ep, when those BOZOS decided,
    "gasp.. this is different from our cookie-cutter show...
    We Must Add a "Babe" and a "Jock", or people will never watch it!"

    Frigging idiots. As soon as they did that, it became more like other
    shows, and I was highly LESS interested in continuing to watch it.
    Not to mention the "[ultra]dumb jock" then proceeding to get more
    screen time than any of the other guys.

    Damn network execs.

  149. Good and Bad by MBCook · · Score: 1

    I'm glad we're getting family guy back (that was (dare i say it?) better than the simpsons! (maybe i shouldn't have said that)). Anyway, i LOVE the lone gunman, how 'bout someone starts a petition to get it back!

    --
    Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
  150. what will chris carter do now? by The_Rook · · Score: 1

    the question we should be asking now is whether we can expect chris carter to do any more series for fox after this.

    think of all the things fox has done to carter. they sold the series to a fox owned cable network for a song (reducing carter's residuals in the process.) and cancelled a couple of his series without having given them even half a chance.

    after those fiascos, i'd expect he's very reluctant to continue working for fox. so the next season of x-files may turn out to be the last one with carter's input. i wonder what he'll do next.

    --
    when religion is no longer the opiate of the masses, governments will resort to real opiates.
  151. Re:I watched some new pilots... by The-Bus · · Score: 1
    I love the cheesy lines some characters speak in CSI. For example, when the unit was investigating a crime scene at an upscale party and had to keep everyone there for questioning...

    "Come for the cocktails... stay for the interrogation!"

    The deliveries are always so brazenly shlocky you can't help but laugh.

    --

    Small potatoes make the steak look bigger.

  152. Too Bad, an HDTV-like show bites the dust... by -tji · · Score: 1
    I thought it was a decent show. I watched it a few times, mostly to get a look at Fox's Enhanced Definition TV (EDTV) picture quality (on Fox stations supporting digital broadcasts).

    It was broadcast in 16:9 Widescreen format, like HDTV, and 60 fps progressive scan, but was at a lower resolution: 480p. While not up to the quality that CBS shows, in 1080i, it was MUCH better than standard TV.

    FYI - Fox also does The X-Files, Malcolm in the Middle, Ally McBeal, Boston Public, Titus, & Dark Angel in this format. CBS does even more, in full HDTV, 1080i mode.

  153. Re:Fox has exactly two good shows: by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 1

    You forgot "When Buildings Collapse" (all the parts).

  154. Re:I won't miss it because... by bob_jenkins · · Score: 1

    I haven't watched TV in years either. I don't find it insulting, though. How could I? Not having watched it in years, I'm not in a position to hold any opinion about it at all.

  155. What An Awesome Fall Lineup by filbo · · Score: 1

    You can tell that the Fox fall line-up sucks without even watching an episode of these shows. 1-Ally McBeal-okay, people like it, but it is stupid and has collapsed under its own weight. How many episodes of a show that focuses on a too-thin, whiny, passive aggressive member of the white upper-class can you watch before you puke? If the answer is more than 6, you should be looking for a good therapist. 2-Boston Public-this show is just bad. I can't believe that people don't read a magazine instead of turning this on before Ally McBeal. Twenty Four- Great. Basically, an obnoxiously long movie spread out in installments so that if you miss a week, you have no idea what is going on. Pasadena- starring Dana Delaney. You can tell that this is going to stink, just from the description. Stand-up comic Bernie Mac- this show (i.e., funny guy finds himself in akward situation with children) has been aired and failed so many times you would think they would have the sense to kill it before they waste time building sets. Undeclared-how many college-based comedies have died horribly in the last five years? Answer: just a few less than shows by comics in weird family situations. X-Files sans Duchovny: Stick a fork in it and turn it over. It's done.

  156. mmm Family Guy... by ellem · · Score: 1

    So broccoli we meet again!

    Who the Hell do you think you are?

    Someday you're going to make a Jewish man very happy.


    ---

    --
    This .sig is fake but accurate.
  157. Yeah, The Family Guy!!! by Fat+Lenny · · Score: 1
    That show RULES!!! TFG is a lot like pot -- most people can't get off the first few times. Trust me, that Stewie (annoying baby) character is a much better character than anyone expects him to be. He grows on you in a good "love to love" way, not the "love to hate" thing going on with the host of The Weakest Link.

    --

    --

    --
    fat lenny's gonna lick your brain today.

  158. Re:WELL.. by slashdoter · · Score: 1
    no time for my usual diatribe today

    darn and I was starting to go into withdraw.


    ________

    --
    Does anyone actually have a Java program designed to control air traffic, or for the operation of a nuclear facility?
  159. WELL.. by slashdoter · · Score: 2
    I watched 3 or 4 of the shows and I was disapointed. I think they were trying to go after the geek sector, or at least the techno savy. The problem I had was the "dumbing down" of every thing tech, We have all see the ten sec hack in about every hacker movie. I would have expected better from theses people, They liked to drop alot of buzz words but failed to make it work. But it did have potintual. It could have been very good


    ________

    --
    Does anyone actually have a Java program designed to control air traffic, or for the operation of a nuclear facility?
  160. Re:Live action Tick? by hitchhikerjim · · Score: 1

    I've seen the pilot, and it's surprisingly great! For only about 100k they managed to shoot a pretty darn good episode... even though my favorite character names are forever lost to Fox Kids....

    jim

    (Uh-oh! It's Apocolypse Cow...)

  161. And you Americans still complain by mkoeller · · Score: 1

    I HATE this. How could Americans still complain about which series they can watch on TV? In Germany it takes the major TV networks YEARS to start on a translation and it's practitcally a sure thing that these dubbed versions SUCK. I wisch I could watch any of theses series in their original language - it's simply not possible. I also wish that I wouldn't have to wait over a year to watch them here in Germany. That's really not cool.

    Well, anyway. Have fun watching your TV series. But please DON'T COMPLAIN about some of them being axed because I'M ALREADY JEALOUS ENOUGH.

    --
    "It may be your sole purpose in life to serve as a warning to others."
    1. Re:And you Americans still complain by mkoeller · · Score: 1

      Very funny. How do you get a fast internet connection in germany? You don't! And if you do you'll have to spend A LOT of money.

      How do you play Region Code 1 DVDs in Europe? You don't! (Well, actually, you do but it's usually quite a hassle.)

      And how do you pay for such a DVD collection? I don't have like 150$ lying around just to watch "X-Files".

      --
      "It may be your sole purpose in life to serve as a warning to others."
    2. Re:And you Americans still complain by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      You have Lexx, how can you complain? We only get it like 2 seasons later.
      -

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
  162. Family Guy? by JCMay · · Score: 1
    Oh, that's right. The first thing that came to my mind when I read, "Family Guy," was instead the "Family Man" of Family Auto Mart, which started here in Melbourne and now has another used car lot in Orlando.

    The Family Man runs some infomercials on local cable that have to be seen to be believed.

  163. THE FAMILY GUY!!??! by captnitro · · Score: 1

    The best show in the history of man. Enough said.

  164. Re:You need TiVo by IronChef · · Score: 2


    I wish they'd pull the plug on Dark Angel. I can watch nearly any sci-fi schlock but that show bites.

    Lone Gunmen, I'm sorry to see you go...

  165. Re:You need TiVo by IronChef · · Score: 2

    Are you saying that you like Black Scorpion? Compared to that, Dark Angel is pure art.

    OK, even *I* won't stoop that low. :)

  166. Re:Twenty Four???? by jstarr · · Score: 2

    The concept of telling a story and then ending the series is not new at all. The original Star Trek was only supposed to run for five years -- thus, the 'five-year' mission. The same goes for many anime series. Most of the anime series are only budgeted for so long and the creators know that they have to finish the story within 24 or 36 or whatever episodes. The animators of Cowboy Bebop, for example, knew exactly how many episodes to make. Maison Ikkoku has a definite beginning, middle, and end.

    It's not really about our short-attention spans, it's about telling a complete story. Few would say that books appeal to a limited attention span, but the authors do not try to write infinitely long running stories.

    Drama is more powerful when people know the end, know that they have all the information and they recieve a revelation about someone's past next season which belies all they have seen so far.

  167. Re:Fox has exactly two good shows: by Weedhopper · · Score: 1
    King of the Hill is pretty funny, too. It helps to have lived in Texas as a non native Texan to truly appreciate it, though.

  168. Re:/. doesn't like X-Files? by Weedhopper · · Score: 1
    SInce Mulder won't be back next year, I think everyone is dreading the samething I am, another season along the lines of Fall '00 episodes wher we have Scully as the believer (aka Mulder standin) and T2-guy as the skeptic (aka early Scully standin), minus all the sexual tension between Scully and Mulder.

    It seems pretty obvious to me that the female "believer" agent that has been a semi regular for the past few episodes is being set up as a Scully replacement and as a flip flop of the Mulder/Scully role.

  169. I watched some new pilots... by FortKnox · · Score: 2

    I was asked to watch some pilots for drama shows for CBS. You know what I spent an entire saturday watching? Either spinoffs of popular shows, or copies of popular shows. It blew chunks. I wrote all over my reviews "BE ORIGINAL. Nobody wants a copy of what they like, they want something new."

    Of course, my opinion mattered little, because the new dramas coming out this fall are just copies of popular dramas on TV. And they will be replacing the copies/spinoffs of popular shows that just got cancelled (the tick may be a good exception, though).

    That's what sucks about publishers for media. They want copies of what sells. That is why the video game shelves are full of FPS that are the same-old. No one is willing to take a chance on something new, unless you are proven in the field (i.e.: Warren Spector aka God).

    --
    Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
    1. Re:I watched some new pilots... by iomud · · Score: 2

      You know, the only two shows on CBS I watch are CSI and Letterman. I was surprised by CSI it's a pretty good show even though it's the same type thing every show; crime is commited, evidence is collected and someone gets put in jail. Wait at least I think i'm sure I still like it...

  170. Re:Yeah, The Tick! by Golias · · Score: 1

    Ben Edlund, not Elton. My bad. I had him mixed up with the guy who co-wrote the Black Adder series for BBC TV. Thanks for the correction.

    --

    Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

  171. Re:Yeah, The Tick! by Golias · · Score: 4
    The Tick thought he needed a war cry, and "SPOOOON" was the first thing that came to mind, because he was holding one at the time.

    For those wondering about the new series, here is the skinny....

    The pilot was made, clips of it have been leaked, and it is damned funny.

    Yes, it stars the guy who was Puddy on Seinfeld.

    No, it does not star anybody else you have heard of.

    Yes, the show is written by Ben Elton, creator of the original comic book as well as the animated series.

    Characters from the original comic book (Arthur, Chairface, etc.) can show up in the new series, but characters developped for the Fox cartoon (American Maid, El Seed, etc.) can not, because this is a Sony production and Fox holds the rights to those characters. Therefore, if you were a fan of the cartoon, several of your favorite supporting characters will either be absent or re-named.

    The show was slated to be a mid-season replacement, but was then bumped to next fall. There is still no assurance from Fox that it will be in the Fall line-up, either... so you might not actually get to see it until January of next year.

    Details are scattered all over drooling-fanboy sites like Ain't It Cool, so you can read more there.

    Oh, FWIW. The Lone Gunmen did not get more funny as it went on. I had a friend who talked me into watching a couple more episodes, and if anything it got worse. So don't feel bad if you tuned out after seeing the pilot suck so badly. You have missed nothing. (Yea, yea "IMNSHO", "YMMV"... whatever. It sucked.)

    --

    Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

  172. Re:Geek TV by isomeme · · Score: 5
    Computer programming/hacking doesn't involve smoke, explosions, fractal 3D patterns that escape the computer monitor and chase you down corridors, and especially not jiggling bits of female anatomy.

    Have you ever considered the possibility that you're just using the wrong IDE?

    --

    --
    When all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a skull.
  173. "Dark Angel" moving worries me... by Nilatir · · Score: 1

    "Dark Angel" is a good show but I worry about it moving to Friday. I can't think of any FOX show in recent times that has survived a move to Friday nights.



    They come up, blank look.
    Ask dumb question about disk drive.
    Told, they will return.

    --

    "We were half way to Rivendell when the drugs began to take hold."
    -- Hunter S. Tolkien
  174. Re:Too Bad, an HDTV-like show bites the dust... by Nilatir · · Score: 1


    Any idea where I can get more info on Fox's EDTV?
    I've looked on fox.com but they're site is not to friendly for searching. Are all of Fox's EDTV shows in widescreen?

    They come up, blank look.
    Ask dumb question about disk drive.
    Told, they will return.

    --

    "We were half way to Rivendell when the drugs began to take hold."
    -- Hunter S. Tolkien
  175. ya know... by Capt.+Beyond · · Score: 1

    The Lone Gunmen had a lot of potential.... and then they aired the first one. Man was it stupid!!! A really bad Jr. G-Men, written for idiotic teenyboopers, and it took me a month to find out what day it aired. It could have been really great, but they made it idiotically dumb. oh, well, they are bound to showback up in X Files.

    --
    -- "Perceptions create reality. By changing your perceptions you change your reality."
  176. the real reason Family Guy is back... by enrico_suave · · Score: 2

    Stewie told the execs, "you'll rue the day you canceled my show..."

    and they did... Do people outside of New England "get" the rhode island/NE centric humor BTW?

    Maybe Peter is just like the northern version of a "redneck"... *shrug*

    E.

    --
    Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
  177. Hmph. by Dr_Emory · · Score: 1

    I thought this site was for "stuff that matters". I don't know if this qualifies....

  178. Re:Yeah, The Tick! by DA_MAN_DA_MYTH · · Score: 1

    Here in SAT question Form:

    "SPOOOOON" is to The Tick as "Yo Joe!" is to GI Joe...

    Soccer couldn't have caused you to miss the old GI Joe cartoons.
    Cause knowing is half the battle...


    Rehab is for quitters...

    --
    "It takes many nails to build a crib, but one screw to fill it."
  179. Given no chance, unlike ST:TNG by DeadVulcan · · Score: 2

    While watching the last episode (the one with Mitch Pileggi guest starring as Skinner), I was thinking that The Lone Gunmen was finally finding its legs. Just like how ST:TNG found its legs in the second season, and finally became thoroughly enjoyable in the third.

    It's really too bad Fox isn't going to give TLG the chance that the monster franchise name of "Star Trek" gave to TNG. My feeling is that those two words were the only reason TNG lasted longer than a year.

    P.S. Was anyone else rolling on the floor at Pileggi's rendition of Jimmy Bond? That man is a much better actor than I ever gave him credit for.

    --

    --
    Accountability on the heads of the powerful.
    Power in the hands of the accountable.
  180. Re:More stereotypes by Erasmus+Darwin · · Score: 2
    I would like to see a show on network television where gay characters are depicted in the same manner as straight characters; i.e., without any reference to their sexuality. Most of the time, in real life, it isn't relevant, so why should it be important in a sitcom?

    I think you're making a mistake by trying to compare sitcoms to real life. (Quick show of hands: How many of you out there have a wacky neighbor who shows up once every day or so to utter a wise-crack or two and then be on his way?) In a sitcom, sex generally is relevant. We're watching every bit of these peoples' lives. Anything that's funny is more or less fair game, and there are certainly lots of potentially funny things that take place when you throw dating, sex, and relationships into the mix.

    Besides, in virtually all forms of story telling (television, books, movies, etc.), you're generally expected to identify and understand the characters to one degree or another. Empathy helps draw the observer into the story and keep them hooked. While sexually orientation is (rightfully so) a relatively private part of what makes up a person, it's still an important part. Of course, I'm not saying that there's a "gay outlook on life", but rather that your sexual orientation, your race, your nationality, your religion, your upbringing, and where you went to school are all things that affect how you see the world -- knowing some or all of these factors are a key part to understanding a character.

  181. ObGeekTVonFridayNights: SciFi Channel by mbourgon · · Score: 1
    Just a friendly reminder, there are still 2-3 good geek-oriented shows on Friday nights
    1. The Invisible Man. The plots may not be the world's best, but the characters are fun, there's a lot of chemistry, and they do a lot more than just "invisible guy solves problem".
    2. Farscape- If you haven't watched it, do. Go online and find a copy of "Farscape Undressed", it gets you up to speed. Tonight's episode is a winner anyhow, a decent body-swap episode. Great Space Opera.
    3. Outer Limits
    --
    "Sometimes a woman is a kind of religion, she can save your soul & set you free from all your sins" - Bad Examples
  182. If you _did_ actually like the show... by mbourgon · · Score: 2

    Yes, I'll admit that the show has its painful spots. Too self-deprecating for about 5 minutes an episode. However, much like Jimmy, its heart is in the right place. Yeah, the speak is DEFINITELY off, but the stories are decent enough, and the characters can play off each other. And, oh, yeah, it has a good sense of humor.

    For those who did like the show, go to the "Lone Gunmen Second Season campaign". http://lonegunmen.furvect.com/lgmseas2.htm

    --
    "Sometimes a woman is a kind of religion, she can save your soul & set you free from all your sins" - Bad Examples
  183. A possible way to wrap things up.. by JasonMaggini · · Score: 1
    I haven't actually seen the last ep of TLG (was the season/series finale already aired? I hate the Friday Timeslot), but I imagine they could find some way of tying up any loose ends in the X-Files somehow...
    TLG seemed to work better in the context of the 'Files, anyway.

    ---
    The buddhist hamburger joint: They'll make you one with everything.

  184. Re:Geek TV (the invisible man) by BluedemonX · · Score: 1

    This is cable, not network TV. They operate by different rules - if the channel is "all yoga, all the time" or whatever, then a show on yoga is to be geared to people interested in yoga, so you're cut some slack.

    I haven't seen Invisible Man, but I'll check it out.

    Fox really doesn't have that same luxury - they're pitching a show based on the population as a whole, not a subset interested in X.

    Hence the rules, above.

    --

    --- Jump!! Fire!! Bullet time!! - Lego version of the Matrix
  185. Re:Geek TV by BluedemonX · · Score: 1

    Manboobs don't sell ANY beer whatsoever.

    Oh great. Now I've got that image of Eric S Raymond in a latex penguin suit someone described a while back in my head again.

    Not exactly the diet plan I had in mind.

    --

    --- Jump!! Fire!! Bullet time!! - Lego version of the Matrix
  186. Re:More stereotypes by BluedemonX · · Score: 2

    RE: Why, for instance, is every single gay character depicted as a clean, good-hearted, middle-class, sassy best-friend type?

    Consider the tightrope you walk on this one (don't count Showtime's show). Make the guy in ANY way some kind of freak (leather, whips etc) and the Falwell crowd will go more psycho than normal. They're probably writing letters just for having the nice sassy clean upper-middle class neighbour with a cat.

    Make the guy evil, insulting, gross, stereotypical in a nasty way, whatever, and you get to deal with the same Politically Correct hordes that shut down Dr. Laura (rightly). And shut down they did.

    This particular community LIKES being portrayed as clean-cut, affluent, upper middle class and excitingly interesting. Why not cater to em?

    --

    --- Jump!! Fire!! Bullet time!! - Lego version of the Matrix
  187. Re:Geek TV by BluedemonX · · Score: 2

    I was referring to the perspectives of media buyers. Not to the average public.

    "Stereotypes of what Geeks are like (not good writers),"

    Hollywood wants a 90 minute script, crisis at the 45 minutes mark, boy gets girl in the end, preferably with explosions and jiggling boobs. There's actually a template they expect you to follow. Unless you're doing "art" pictures or "independant" cinema, in which case you aren't in Hollywood.

    RE: and what they like (boring details about the evolution of life on planets 1.4 times the gravity of Earth with a Methane atmosphere).

    Most people like sci-fi when it's cowboys and indians, but zargs vs. zoombas in fast rocket ships. That's why Star Trek (white hat Federation, black hat enemy-of-the-series, we're riding on the range, oops in the Federation space on the star cruiser, long range scanner indicates injuns whoops I mean Klingons/Borg/Ferengi/whatever, lots of lasers, cap'n we've got a problem, just "remodulate the frequency..." FIRE! BLAM take us outa here.) did well. And why Babylon 5 was inaccessible to most people.

    RE: Sterotypes of what Hollywood Screenwriters are like (cocaine-snorting yes-men cranking out mindless drivel)."

    Oh, I'm sorry, you're so right. They're all English majors, attempting the next version of Citizen Kane. WRONG. They're looking for proven formula of this month, and then to patch a few relatively original ideas onto it. e.g. There's Something about Mary begat Tomcats begat Freddy Got Fingered. OR Saving Private Ryan begat Pearl Harbor will beget another bunch of WWII films...

    People don't want risk. They want to get paid.

    --

    --- Jump!! Fire!! Bullet time!! - Lego version of the Matrix
  188. Re:Geek TV by BluedemonX · · Score: 2

    RE: So basically you're saying that the inclusion of any female in any action show is sensationalist and that all female action stars are there merely as sex objects?

    Right. The inclusion of Jeri Ryan was a plot device to advance DS9 to high art. The fact that she's one of the few women who don't require Federation Standard Issue Padding in the chest area had nothing to do with it. The fact that they knew the geek hordes would start trading her picture in terabytes over the Internet the moment she was cast - come on, how chauvinist. They were only interested in her for her splendid acting ability - noone else does that Borg monotone so well!

    Let me ask ya this. That woman on the Lone Gunmen. Or even the stripper on "FPS" in X files. Were they REALLY necessary? No. They were eye-candy of the most offensive, objectifying sort.

    The day they render Lara Croft as a 230 lb woman with acne, we'll talk.

    --

    --- Jump!! Fire!! Bullet time!! - Lego version of the Matrix
  189. Re:Geek TV by BluedemonX · · Score: 3

    This also explains why stereotypes ABOUND on network TV.

    Consider how much time you have for a show. Not long (assume 30 minutes). Now. Remove time for credits on both sides (we're left with 25 minutes, say), and commercials. You have about 16 minutes in which to construct a story, set it up, let it roll, wrap it up, and move on.

    This explains why, for example, if you need a drug dealer, you don't have a clean cut white kid, and then waste three minutes explaining how he got into selling drugs. And even then, half the audience will drool into its cheetos cause you didn't put "THIS GUY IS A DRUG DEALER" in ten inch high letters on his shirt. You're supposed to have a sleazy looking, shifty eyed hispanic guy in a hairnet with a pistol going "chu wan coke, mon?" 10 seconds guaranteed, vs three minutes, maybe. You think assembly language coders strive for efficiency in clock cycles, you ain't seen network TV.

    --

    --- Jump!! Fire!! Bullet time!! - Lego version of the Matrix
  190. Geek TV by BluedemonX · · Score: 5

    Is nigh on impossible for several reasons

    1) It is against unwritten network rules to write something above an eight year old reading level (they figure that by doing so, you risk losing a sizable chunk of the TV viewing population who don't have a high literacy and will switch off)

    2) Computer programming/hacking doesn't involve smoke, explosions, fractal 3D patterns that escape the computer monitor and chase you down corridors, and especially not jiggling bits of female anatomy.

    3) RE the above: a chess match is high drama for those in the know: but to a channel surfer flipping through the channels looking for some light entertainment between "Survivor" and "WWF Raw", it's terrifically boring. Ditto software development or hacking.

    4) Keeping things bleeding edge is difficult with the writing/editing/shooting cycle, so either set it so far in the future you just plug your cyberBorg headset into the computer and stare steelily into the Federation flat-panel screen, or risk people laughing their ASSES off at "yeah! This state of the art 486 is k-Rad!" (especially when the show goes into reruns).

    5) Biggest hurdle: most geeks can't write. Those who do are VERY BORING WRITERS. "Hey dutch! When are you going to finish the script!" "Quiet! I'm working out the physics of the alien lifeform given a planet 1.4 x Earth's gravity with a methane atmosphere!". Most writers are cocaine snorting media whores. Write to spec as fast as possible. Open up the template, stick in some stock characters, sell the script, move on.

    Hence, any "geek" oriented show will have to by definition not work. Hence the inclusion of jiggling women, dumb jokes, offensive stereotypes, and unrealistic, stupid storylines.

    --

    --- Jump!! Fire!! Bullet time!! - Lego version of the Matrix
    1. Re:Geek TV by pixel_bc · · Score: 1

      Most writers are cocaine snorting media whores...

      So tell us what you really think of them... :)

    2. Re:Geek TV by Dolly_Llama · · Score: 1
      especially not jiggling bits of female anatomy.

      ok, jiggling bits of anatomy, just not necessarily female anatomy... ick.

      --

      Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known. -- Carl Sagan

    3. Re:Geek TV by pyat · · Score: 1

      get around the obsolescence thing by showing no actual hardware, just people discussing beautiful algorithms.

    4. Re:Geek TV by Rogerborg · · Score: 1
      • you're saying that the inclusion of any female in any action show is sensationalist and that all female action stars are there merely as sex objects

      Counter examples then? Xena? Good role and character, but the outfit is pure eye candy. Note that her sidekick's kit got increasingly skimpier as well.

      Janeway? Good role and outfit, but no character to speak of. And when the ratings plunged, what happened? Jeri Ryan's spandex clad udders appeared, and Janeway was relegated to a bit part.

      Scully? Perhaps initially, but haven't we been seeing her sweating in slips and thin vests a lot recently?

      Delenn and perhaps Ivanova are the only characters that I can think of who provide sound counter examples.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  191. The sleeping months by David+Wong · · Score: 2

    ``Twenty Four.''...a real-time drama that plays out over 24 episodes."

    A real-time drama that chronicles all 24 hours of a particular day... can't wait for those eight "sleeping" episodes.

  192. More stereotypes by David+Wong · · Score: 2

    Though that theory doesn't explain all network stereotypes. Why, for instance, is every single gay character depicted as a clean, good-hearted, middle-class, sassy best-friend type?

    Just give me one good evil gay crime boss. That's all I ask.

  193. Twenty Four???? by SomeoneGotMyNick · · Score: 2
    Is this the new paradigm in television?

    Create shows that are short lived and complete in a handful of episodes? I wonder where they got that concept from? <cough>Survivor</cough>

    Is this television's way of both catering to our short attention spans while simultaneously preventing television shows from going on so long that the actors can demand more money to keep a good thing going?

    I only recall one good series that worked this way. It was called Starblazers.

    1. Re:Twenty Four???? by SomeoneGotMyNick · · Score: 2
      Good points you make there. Even though Star Trek was cut short due to a problem with popularity at the time.

      I guess a big question is: Are we ready for it here, in America, during prime time television? With everyone cheering on the decision of renewing any given television series, would those same people feel satisfied about a short lived series? People tend to get comfortable with a set of characters and a storyline and look forward to more. It also helps them to plan their bowling nights if they know their show is going to stay at the same time/day :)

      Throw a new series each spring/fall season at the masses and it will get mixed reaction. It almost seems like a new showcase for television actors like Star Search was for musicians and singers. I only see production companies making out like bandidts on this. Contract new actors on a short term and ditch them forever if they don't work out. Next series, hire new 'low cost' actors. On series finales, charge 3x for advertising because anybody who missed other eposodes will want to see the finale.

      I know there are benefits for the actors, too, like less type typecasting. But will we continue to see 'memorable' actors and characters if television series don't last for more than a year?

    2. Re:Twenty Four???? by tb3 · · Score: 2
      Most U.K. shows have a finite life span. John Cleese said everything he wanted to say in 12 episodes of 'Fawlty Towers'. Patrick McGoohan told the whole story of 'The Prisoner' in 17.

      I'm watching a 6 episode series on BBC America called 'Coupling', and it's brilliant! Think a funny, sexually explicit 'Friends', then think 100 times better.
      -----------------

      --

      www.lucernesys.comHorizon: Calendar-based personal finance

  194. What do they have against Dark Angel? by renderhead · · Score: 1
    Fox must really have it in for Dark Angel, since they plan to move it to Friday night, the time slot where good TV shows go to die.

    Anybody remember the show "Brooklyn Bridge?" Didn't think so. It was an excellent show from my youth that lasted 2 seasons on CBS, but midway through the second season it was moved to, you guessed it, Friday night. Whatever made Fox think "The Lone Gunmen" was strong enough to survive the time slot is beyond me. Friday night is when the key demographic, young Americans in high school and college, are out having lives, not sitting at home watching Fox. If you ever see your favorite show move to Friday evening, either make like the trekkies of the sixties and start a massive write-in campaign to save it, or start your funeral preparations. That show is dead meat.

    --
    I wish that my inferiority complex were as good as yours.

    -RenderHead

  195. Re:Mindless Ramblings by The+Ape+With+No+Name · · Score: 1
    The Tick live version will be disappointing, but I think that it is neat that someone is giving a nod to a really funny cartoon. The whole Civically Minded Five is worth every moment. Fledermaus hittin' on American Maid and busting the Tick's balls for being "a bit too brave."

    Stewie rules -- Rex Harrison on acid.

    --
    Comparing it to Windows will be a moot point, since El Dorado is going to have a 40% larger code base than XP.
  196. Yeah, The Tick! by The+Ape+With+No+Name · · Score: 2

    Those super monkeys have tossed themselves into my salad again! I understand that the dude who played Putty on Seinfeld will be the Tick. Excellent casting choice. But who for Arthur? More importantly, who will be cast as El Seed, quite possibily the funniest evil character ever.

    --
    Comparing it to Windows will be a moot point, since El Dorado is going to have a 40% larger code base than XP.
    1. Re:Yeah, The Tick! by The+Ape+With+No+Name · · Score: 2

      There you go making your blue monkey troubles again!

      --
      Comparing it to Windows will be a moot point, since El Dorado is going to have a 40% larger code base than XP.
    2. Re:Yeah, The Tick! by vistas · · Score: 1

      the replacement is BatManuel, a eurotrash version, who otherwise is apparently faithful to die fledermaus.

    3. Re:Yeah, The Tick! by vistas · · Score: 1

      The show was slated to be a mid-season replacement, but was then bumped to next fall. There is still no assurance from Fox that it will be in the Fall line-up, either... so you might not actually get to see it until January of next year.
      They indeed announced that it will be in their thursday lineup, at 8:30 between Family Guy, and Temptation Island II.

    4. Re:Yeah, The Tick! by ZeiramMR · · Score: 2

      Yes, the show is written by Ben Elton, creator of the original comic book as well as the animated series

      Just a quick correction, the creator of "The Tick" is named Ben Edlund, not Elton. You are correct in that he is writing for the live-action show and the rest of your information. I've been waiting on Fox to get off their duff and air it for a while now, but at least the comics have continued.

    5. Re:Yeah, The Tick! by Art_XIV · · Score: 1

      All I have to say irt The Tick is :Spoon!

      --
      The only thing that we learn from history is that nobody learns anything from history.
    6. Re:Yeah, The Tick! by Chakat · · Score: 1

      Forgive my ignorance, as I always seemed to have soccer games when Tick was on, but what's up with the Tick and Spoon? Enquiring scrats want to know.

      --

      If god had intended you to be naked, you would have been born that way.

    7. Re:Yeah, The Tick! by KilljoyAZ · · Score: 1
      Therefore, if you were a fan of the cartoon, several of your favorite supporting characters will either be absent or re-named.
      I really hope they have Die Fledermaus, or at least a renamed equivalent. (never read the comic, so I don't know)
      --
      This .sig is currently on hiatus for retooling.
  197. Taco is on a colon kick. by Vann_v2 · · Score: 1

    He put a colon into the Shrek article, which was new. But then, then he put two into one sentence for this article. That has to be a record of some sort.

  198. Re:The Lone Gunmen by albanac · · Score: 1

    I agree with you about Hush. Not least because the cast of teenaged characters were almost entirely silent from beginning to end. *8-)

    ~cHris
    --
    Chris Naden
    "Sometimes, home is just where you pour your coffee"
  199. Re:INCITEFUL IS NOT A WORD, DUMBASS by Cardhore · · Score: 1

    Thanks for the constructive criticism, asshole. :)

  200. side note: Family Guy. by fishfucker · · Score: 1

    i am just happy to hear that the television show with the BEST COMIC TIMING EVER is returning to air. just in time too -- the simpsons is going into the pooper with whatever godawful talent they've recruited to write over the last season. ("hey -- then homer should say 'WOO-HOO' again -- THAT'LL BE A LAUGH RIOT!")

    fisfhucerk.

    a must-see -- if you've witnessed the few "einstein" scenes, you know what i'm talking about.

  201. Here's your favorite show... by centauri · · Score: 1

    ... The Lone Gunman. It's hilarious. And now... it's gone.

    The Tick: "Aw, man, that's the pits!"

    --
    Don't blame me, I voted for Durga.
  202. Live action Tick? by Hairy_Potter · · Score: 1

    What sweet honey is going to play American Maid?

    Anyhow, I don't see a live action Tick working well.

    1. Re:Live action Tick? by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      What about The Evil Midnight Bomber What Bombs At Midnight?

      I use him for my "You've got mail" sound effect...

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  203. I'm Worried about The Tick by westfirst · · Score: 1

    The animated series rocked, but the buzz about the live-action version isn't so hot. They nuked one of the writers who helped make the animated version everything it ever was. The word is that they want it to be more "Seinfeld with Capes" than "The Tick". Well, that's the price you pay when you switch to film, a medium where creating an explosion is significantly more expensive than creating a wink. Spoon!

  204. Family Guy v Lone Gunmen by Aciel · · Score: 1

    I don't know about the rest of you, but after the first three episodes of Family Guy the show crashed and burned. It got incredibly boring and not-funny.

    On the other hand, the only reason I stopped watching the Lone Gunmen is that it switched timeslots, to a time when I couldn't watch. I loved the show--finally geeks as heroes. And that includes the first episode, which I thought was great.

    I also recommend Farscape, on Scifi. If that gets the ax, I'll kill myself. But luckily it's not looking like it's moving in an ax direction.

    Aciel
    aciel@speakeasy.net

  205. Stewie Rules! by dmatos · · Score: 1

    or even better, the Olson twins as Stewie stand-ins, Fifteen Minutes of Shame

    "Blast! I am victorious!"
    "Whose leg do you have to hump to get a dry martini around here?"

    --

    It may look like I'm doing nothing, but I'm actively waiting for my problems to go away.
    --Scott Adams
  206. It made US look stupid! by NineNine · · Score: 1

    Thank GOD The Lone Gunmen is gone! It was so bad it made us geeks look stupid!

  207. Coming soon - The Tick on Futurama! by WillSeattle · · Score: 2

    Yes, sure The Tick will be live action, but has that ever stopped anyone? Of course not!

    So, when the opening credits of Futurama start running and you see a blue figure leaping from building to building, you'll know The Terror That Has No Sequel, Episode Zero!

    --
    --- Will in Seattle - What are you doing to fight the War?
  208. Fox has exactly two good shows: by Omerna · · Score: 3

    1) Simpsons. A classic, simply the funniest show on TV. To get all the visual puns takes approximately 4.6 viewings a show, which is the perfect amount.

    2) Futurama. Almost as good as the Simpsons, in the same style. Bender is quite possibly the funniest character on TV right now.

    As long as Fox has these they're OK.
    --------------------------------------

    --


    No sig for you.
    1. Re:Fox has exactly two good shows: by NateE · · Score: 1

      Check out Invader ZIM on Nickelodeon. Its a new series that is like Futurama times two. Don't be put off that its on Nick, its geared towards capturing an adult audience. Plays Fridays at 9pm.

    2. Re:Fox has exactly two good shows: by matrix29 · · Score: 1

      Bender: "I've had enough of comedy, there's a whole field of hilarious tragedy yet to be uncovered."

      --- And one in funny misquotes as well.

      --
      "Face it, a nation that maintains a 72% approval rating on George W. Bush is a nation with a very loose grip on reality.
    3. Re:Fox has exactly two good shows: by chemical55 · · Score: 1

      Dude, you forgot "When Animals Attack pts 1-5"

  209. Re:The Lone Gunmen by o_kenway · · Score: 1


    How can you say something SO foolish - All the varients of Buffy et al are perfect TV - Friday nights here at uni wouldn't be the same without them. I used to like the X-Files until the last coople of sereis completely turned me off. It is something to think about that all of Chris Carter's series except for the X-Files have been a flop - Harsh Realm (I think that's what it's called - my sister (font of all things Chris Carter) is miles away at the moment) being a prime example.

    Here in Scotland we haven't had the Lone Gunmen yet (certainly not on terrestrial TV anyway) but having read the (online) reviews I am fairly certain that it will rank with Dark Knight, Xena and Hercules which usually are only worth watching because nothing else is on.

    Anyway - Who is the X-Files answer to Faith?

  210. "The Tick" Live Show Characters by DerKlempner · · Score: 1

    And the pilot episode has the replacement characters, Lady Liberty and BatManuel.

    It's Captain Liberty, not Lady Liberty. And to answer the original question, she's being played by Liz Vassey, guest star extraordinaire.
    --
    UNIX: Find it, fsck it, forget it.
  211. Thoughts Regarding Dark Angel... by Art_XIV · · Score: 1

    Jessica Alba! Ooooooo-wheeeeee!

    Jessica Alba.

    What about Ashley Judd? Yeah! Ashley Judd!

    Jessica Alba - though - those dark eyes...

    No... Ashley Judd.

    I'm too old for Jessica Alba, anyway.

    How old is Ashley Judd?

    Yeah, Ashley Judd, definitely.

    Well, maybe Jessica Alba.

    ...

    --
    The only thing that we learn from history is that nobody learns anything from history.
    1. Re:Thoughts Regarding Dark Angel... by tb3 · · Score: 1

      Ashley Judd is 33, and they're both engaged. This doesn't stop my gay friend from lusting after either of them.
      -----------------

      --

      www.lucernesys.comHorizon: Calendar-based personal finance

  212. To quote Frohike by jeff13 · · Score: 1



    Weirdness!


    ______
    jeff13

  213. Sad, But Maybe for the Best by CrazyLegs · · Score: 1

    Look, I liked the show. The premier SUCKED, but I gave it some time and it got better. But really, where was the premise going? We knew the Gunmen already as interesting - albeit 2D - characters and the new show didn't really flesh them out any further. Instead, they add the Good-Hearted-Doofus-Guy and Mysterious-Sexy-Gal to round out the show's possibilities. These characters were interesting to watch, but really amounted to denizens of the same last ditch sidekick world as The Great Gazoo and Scrappy Doo. In the end, the show was better than Harsh Realm, but still couldn't stand up on its own without a lot more depth of character. *sigh*

    --

    CrazyLegs

    "Pork!!" said the Fish, and we all laughed.

  214. Well.. by Seeka · · Score: 1

    I'm glad the X-Files are coming back, but they didn't have to cancel the lone gunman. In my opinion, the downfall of the show was when they put it on Friday. I just have Sunday nights reserved for Fox. Friday's are more NBC-based. ;)

    Seeka

  215. Fox Channel by IanA · · Score: 1

    is going downhill fast IMO.
    Malcolm in the Middle, Titus etc might be semi-popular, but they are hell to watch. There shows just get dumber and dumber every new pilot. Ever seen an episode of Malcolm in the Middle? NO PLOT. Horrible. The Lone Gunmen had huge potential and it is sad that it was axed so early, as it could have turned out to be a XFiles/Simpson type show.
    Instead Fox continues to go for the 'quick buck' with shows like Cops, Who wants to marry a multimillionaire(or whatever it was called) and the like.
    Very sad to see the Lone Gunmen die as it showed promise, I see Fox getting their own problems because of lack of quality in the future.

  216. By the way by Scoria · · Score: 1

    You can find all of the shows going off the air, as well as returning shows here.

    --
    Do you like German cars?
  217. DIE Family Guy DIE!!!!! by Teahouse · · Score: 1

    Jesus! Fox has been trying to schlock this weak-ass Simpsons knock-off for fucking 2 years with no luck...SOMEBODY HAS TO KILL THE BABYSITTER! The producer of this brain-dead show must be blowing Rupert Murdoch. TLG is gonna get killed. Knew that was inevitable....it was put in the friday DEATH-slot. Unfortunately The Family Guy lives on like some vampire in a crossless, sunless, steakless world. Fat-slob comedy is dead...unless you live in New England...get over it Fox. Whew...I feel better now:)

    --
    "Curiosity killed the cat, but for a while I was a suspect."- Steven Wright
  218. Re:/. doesn't like X-Files? by Zaknafein500 · · Score: 1

    I think the renewal of "X-Files" for a 10th season is bigger news . . .

    Well, that would be big news, especially since next season will only be The X-Files ninth.

    . . . Anyone see Sunday's episode? Damn, that was well-done action/adventure TV! . . .

    I will agree, last week's episode was good. However, the general quality of the series has degraded significantly this season. The last few episodes have been good mostly because Duchovny has been back. The episodes earlier in the season were lacking in comparison to some of the greats from the earlier seasons. It was rumored that there were two options for the series after the eighth season, keep going another year, or stop and produce one last film. I would have loved to see the series end on a high note like that, rather than try to squeeze out another 20 episodes without Duchovny.

    --

    "The guide is definitive, reality is frequently inaccurate."
  219. If you really like the show... by Cirrius · · Score: 1

    Then support them, and shoot an email to: askfox@foxinc.com And let them know your opinion on the cancellation.

  220. /. doesn't like X-Files? by Artifice_Eternity · · Score: 1
    I think the renewal of "X-Files" for a 10th season is bigger news than cancellation of "Lone Gunmen" after half a season. "X-Files" has actually gotten good again over the past few months. Anyone see Sunday's episode? Damn, that was well-done action/adventure TV! Full of plot holes you could drive a garbage truck thru (and they did, at the end), but that's just something you get used to, like technobabble on Trek.

    All we ever see stories about on /. is Trek drek.

    Let the flames begin.

  221. ummm..... by gabba_gabba_hey · · Score: 1

    Not sure I really wanna think about Taco's colon(s) right now - brings to mind too many goatse flashbacks.

  222. cult status by JohnnyKnoxville · · Score: 1

    The sad thing about the FOX network is that if a show doesn't achieve cult status, it gets cancelled. It seems FOX has cancelled alot of shows that would have made it on other networks. Many good shows have seen the FOX axe. Ned & Stacey comes to mind.

  223. Re:The Lone Gunmen by tb3 · · Score: 4

    No! Buffy stays! Aside from the babe factor, it has some of the best writing on TV. 'Hush' from last season is one of the best pieces of TV writing in years.
    -----------------

    --

    www.lucernesys.comHorizon: Calendar-based personal finance

  224. Goodbye TLG, hello... XF? by Faust7 · · Score: 1

    TLG was really a mediocre show; applause to Carter for at least giving it a try though. Now all eyes are on XF again, but what will it give after Duchovny's permanent departure? The writers will have to come up with some quality character development (which IMO means focusing more on Doggett, a tad less on Scully, and making Agent Harrison a regular) and truly surprising developments in the Colonization storyline, which absolutely needs to be resolved by the series finale.

  225. Re:huh by Faust7 · · Score: 1
    don't you know hes back? they found him, hes alive, etc...

    I'm well aware of all that. But Duchovny's leaving the show after this season.

  226. Jimmy and Yves by geoswan · · Score: 1
    I wondered about this. I figured that there was always a strong element of comic relief in the portrayal of the three original Lone Gunmen on the X-files. They needed a "straight-man" -- someone who would ask questions, so the clever parts could be explained. On the X-files Mulder and or Sculley filled this role. Hence Jimmy's role.

    Yves Harlow is a more benevolent cancer man. Personally, I didn't mind her character at all.

    I thought the series had some very clever writing. I particularly enjoyed clever bits, like the episode with the super-genius chimps taking place at the "Boulle Primate Research Center". French author Pierre Boulle wrote a novel "Monkey Planet" which was later the basis of the movie "Planet of the Apes". (Another book of his was the basis for "Bridge over the River Kwai".)

    I was looking forward to the rebroadcast of the X-files episode that episode where the Lone Gunmen first come together.

  227. The Mark Twain factor by geoswan · · Score: 1
    RE: Sterotypes of what Hollywood Screenwriters are like (cocaine-snorting yes-men cranking out mindless drivel)."

    Oh, I'm sorry, you're so right. They're all English majors, attempting the next version of Citizen Kane. WRONG. They're looking for proven formula of this month, and then to patch a few relatively original ideas onto it.

    Then there is the "Mark Twain factor". Once you learn how to be one of the few people who is successful in your chosen field, you may find that it stops being your dream job, and has become just as boring and stultifying as all those mundane jobs you couldn't dream of ever doing.

    In his autobiography, Sam Clemens described his childhood dream of becoming a Mississipi River Boat pilot. Young Clemens grew up next to the dark, powerful, mysterious river. Being a River Boat Pilot in those days was a very high prestige occupation. The navigable channel, and navigational dangers, were constantly changing in those days. Pilots were hired for one passage only. They were paid as much or more than the boat's regular captains.

    When they were on, they had tremendous responsibility -- but in short bursts.

    Clemens wanted to become a River Boat pilot. Clemens did learn how to become a River Boat pilot.

    And what did he find? He found that once he learned how to read the surface of the river, once he learned the meaning of the smooth "boils", eddies and "snags", the river totally lost all of its mystery and romance for him.

    So he quit, and did something else. His pen-name, "Mark Twain", is a remnant of his love for the occupation of river boat piloting. When the depth was uncertain a sailor would sit on the bow, measuring the depth. "Mark Twain" is a particular depth measurement.

    This is a cautionary tale I tell to any young person I meet who wants to become an artist or musician.

  228. Life imitates art by geoswan · · Score: 1
    I've just spent two hours reading the comments of other slashdotters on Lone Gunmen.

    Many slashdotters criticized the Lone Gunmen because they found it contained too many technical inaccuracies. I won't argue with that. But they got the most important thing about the dark side of geek culture nailed down.

    You see the dark side of geek culture where technical accuracy becomes a tool for emotional expression and the assertion of social dominance. Langley and Frohicke aren't really friends. They have an armed truce, where they agree not to fight out who was the true mojo, the right stuff -- in other words -- who can be most technically accurate. And they fail. They fight all the time. And they brought in visiting geek experts, who use their greater technical knowledge to dump all over L & F.

    Is it possible that the real problem some detractors had with the show was that it hit too close to home?

  229. TLG a cross between "Get Smart" and "MI"? by geoswan · · Score: 1
    The Lone Gunmen was starting to get on my nerves. Every other episode had someone wearing what looked like an orthodontic retainer that changed their voice (complete with poor lip-synching)...
    I thought this device was really, really lame when it was used in John Woo's goofy Mission Impossible 2. When Lone Gunmen used it I didn't think it was goofy. I thought it was a clever implied criticism of the goofy MI2. To my way of thinking it would be a goofy device in a vehicle that took itself seriously, as MI2 did. But Lone Gunmen was not supposed to be taken 100% seriously. Isn't there an interview out there, from before the first broadcast, where Carter said he intended to make TLG borrow elements of the wonderful old "Get Smart" TV show in addition to the wonderful old original "Mission Impossible" TV show?

    OK, a number of you guys have mentioned a pilot for TLG, that did not feature Yves, or Jimmy. When was this broadcast, and what was it about?

  230. You need TiVo by McSpew · · Score: 1

    Sorry to sound like a mindless drone with a brainslug, but I used to think there was never anything good on TV until I bought my TiVo. Now there's always something good on TV. Usually, there's a lot more than I can possibly watch.

    I thought The Lone Gunmen was hilarious and I'm really sorry to see Fox pull the plug so damn fast. Sometimes, it's really hard to believe they're the same network that kept the X-Files on the air when it wasn't popular, or that had the nerve to put The Simpsons on the air.

  231. Hmmm. Didn't see that coming. by Aerog · · Score: 1

    But can you really be surprised since it's Fox? This isn't the first time they get a great show then just cancel it because it doesn't fit the apparent "standards" they set out. I'm specifically thinking of Escaflowne (which they butchered nontheless with their translation and story "fixing") but it's happened before and I don't have any doubt it'll happen again. At least they brought back the Family Guy (after they prematurely cancelled it, too).

    --

    - Relativistic? That's barely Newtonian!
  232. Cancellation of the Lone Gunmen? by glenkim · · Score: 1
    What's really happening is that the show is exposing the truth about what's really going on in the world, and the Man is trying to shut them up. The Truth is out there!

    Hold on a second, somebody's knocking on my door...

  233. Re:Other sources ? (And a dumb question) by ethaz · · Score: 1

    In general, how does one download from IRC? I thought it was just chat...

  234. Re:Other sources ? (And a dumb question) by ethaz · · Score: 1

    Many thanks! Of course, my wife just told me that she was a freshman in college when she learned what "fart" meant, so I guess I'm notthe lamest one in the house!

  235. The real tragedy by slashdot_commentator · · Score: 1


    I can't believe they're cancelling Cleopatra 2525! Granted its stupid, but there was something amusing and eye-catching about a chick ninja/special-ops team of the future. They had a good villian (Krigen), and in retrospect, the writing wasn't that bad at all. In fact, the ending episode had a cool twist (Earth was taken over by Eco-AI machines). On second thought, it would seem damn predictable and formulaic, given the Matrix, but it does have an original feel.

    What the hell is the WB thinking?!?! They've just lost Buffy and probably Angel. They're giving last rites to Xena and getting rid of some underperforming shows, but what the hell do they think will be better replacements?!?!

    --
    There is no America. There is no democracy. There is only IBM and AT&T and DuPont, Dow, General Electric, and Exxon
  236. Lone Gunmen was flawed by slashdot_commentator · · Score: 1


    But I find it difficult putting the finger on what was wrong.

    1) I disagree with the criticisms of the Jimmy Bond and Yves Harlow characters. You have to expand the character base for show longevity (or three guys become damned typed after a while). JB adds muscle to the group, and his naivete gives contrast to the LG. Yves ALWAYS playing the LG was annoying, but she was much needed eye-candy and wasn't too bad otherwise.

    2) Wasn't Langley supposed to be the computer geek extraordinare? Then why is he ALWAYS bringing in some other kung-fu dweeb to get into a particularly difficult system? A smarter thing to have done would be to expand Langley's RPG friends for characters and plot devices. I would have also liked to have seen Byers do more social engineering.

    3) Lack of good, reproducible villians hurt the show too. (Mebbe they were aiming for a PI noire, which didn't need them, but... eh.)

    4) The real problem was that instead of the LGs being the central characters, they ended up being scaffolding; they were the machinery that made the plot go. How many classic lines or scenes can you think of for that show that were from them?

    5) Also I think Carter wanted to brand a theme to the show, "comedic three stooge geeks" and EVERY episode turned out the SAME damned way. Besides that flaw, it brings the problem of killing the persona they had in X-Files, which was goofy but resourceful and COMPETANT(!) geeks. The LG show had them as chumps everytime. How can you develop character interest over that?

    --
    There is no America. There is no democracy. There is only IBM and AT&T and DuPont, Dow, General Electric, and Exxon
  237. Mindless Ramblings by kypper · · Score: 2
    The X-Files is returning, sans Mulder. Fortunately, The Family Guy will come back, as well as the premiere of the live action version of The Tick.

    K... I'm impressed with how well that dude from Terminator 2 has done in Mulder's place, but... X-Files isn't X-Files without Duchovney.

    The Family Guy is the funniest. Weren't there problems with voice-actors finding other jobs, however? Someone have a link?

    The tick was humourous in it's cartoony elasticity. Live Version=Suicide.

    Just my 2 cents.

  238. Fox giveth and Fox taketh away by varchar · · Score: 1

    I'm angry, but not surprised that Fox killed The Lone Gunmen. I think they should have kept showing it on Sunday nights at 9:00 so they could stick the X-Files back to it's original Friday night spot where I could more easily miss it.

    I'm glad to read that The Family Guy is back. That is one of the best shows to ever be televised!

  239. Re:the axe? by asincero · · Score: 1

    As if real geeks actually gave a shit about how they looked. Any alleged geek who truly cares to look the part is only a wanna-be.

  240. Fox widescreen, with more to follow by ColdForged · · Score: 1
    Being an X-Files whore, I was greatly excited to find that Fox broadcasts several shows in widescreen, including The X Files, Ally McBeal, and Malcolm In The Middle. I mean, it ain't no 720p or 1080i like ABC, but I'd rather have widescreen Scully yummies than not.

    Supposedly, according to the engineer at our local Fox affiliate, "Fox intends to use the wide format for most all of their prime time entertainment programs, starting this fall." I can live with that, too. Now if I could just get some 1080i Scully yummies, I'd never leave the house.

    -

    --

    -"I seem to be having tremendous difficulty with my lifestyle." - Arthur Dent

  241. Re:INCITEFUL IS NOT A WORD, DUMBASS by The+Pump · · Score: 1
    Do you care?

    Slightly offtopic here, Slashdot now require 2 minutes between posts? Why not just make it 5 minutes, 15 minutes or 5 hours!?! A number won't fix what's broken.