Slashdot Mirror


The Internet Shifts East

Logic Bomb writes: "The San Francisco Chronicle has an article discussing the World Intellectual Property Organization's prediction that in less than 10 years, Chinese will be the most widely-used language on the web. Assuming the Internet becomes a truly global entity, this is an obvious (and mathematically correct) conclusion. On the other hand, the implementation of the Internet in places without certain civil liberties provides an interesting challenge to typical Western (idealist) notions about what the Internet does for society. Would you even consider the average wealthy Chinese citizen with online access truly 'on the Internet'? And how is the Internet supposed to draw people together when the same old language barrier still exists?"

447 comments

  1. "East" ? by mirko · · Score: 3, Funny

    Isn't China west from San Francisco ?

    --
    Trolling using another account since 2005.
    1. Re:"East" ? by hatchet · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well.. it's a matter of perspective. We now know that only speed(of light) may be absolute so in the matter of fact.. china is also north and south of san francico and 5km away if you are able to bend space-time:)

    2. Re:"East" ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Is it me or did the title illusively (subliminally) read "Internet Shit Feast" ???

    3. Re:"East" ? by Gangis · · Score: 1, Redundant

      Usually when we refer to east and west, imagine the world being cut vertically at the international date line (Between Hawaii and Japan, dead center in the pacific ocean, where if the date in California is a Friday, west of the date line would be Saturday) and folded out. You will see the Americas at the left, and Europe in the middle, with the Orient at the right. That, my friends, is where "east and west" comes from.

      --
      "Black holes are where God divided by zero." - Steve Wright
    4. Re:"East" ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Redundant

      The earth is elliptical. Either direction you go in you will reach China. Just pick a direction and keep going!

    5. Re:"East" ? by nahojd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Assume that you are going to draw a map, and dont really know what the world looks like. It kind of makes sense to put the parts that you do know about in the middle, doesnt it? Im fairly sure thats what the Egyptians or Romans or whoever draw the first maps did. Hence, Europe/Africa in the middle. Besides, it also makes sense to cut the map in the largest body of water. That's also why the international date line is in the Pacific and not in the Baltic Sea.

    6. Re:"East" ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WIPO! I think that's the first "funny" you've gotten yet! congrats and please stop.

    7. Re:"East" ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The thing that will make the Internet truly global is an 0n-th-fly Translator that makes Web pages read in the viewer's own language.

      This is a much needed app for someone to make a bizzillion dollars creating.

      Any takers?

    8. Re:"East" ? by elBart0 · · Score: 2

      Actually the international date line is in the Pacific because it's 180 from Greenwich England, which at the time was used as an arbitrary 0 point.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    9. Re:"East" ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      directly up and away from the earth??? is the universe circular?!?!

    10. Re:"East" ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But it jiggles about a bit to avoid cutting through land... and at least one country jumped over the dateline to get its millenium celebrations in a day earlier...

  2. I wonder if... by cscx · · Score: 1

    One can make the generalization that German is the most widely used language in Internet porn...

  3. fp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    fp

    RLC RULEZ j00!!!!! FJEERE!!!!!

  4. Your waist is small, but your curves are kickin' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And I'm thinkin' bout stickin'.

  5. net-speranto by Transient0 · · Score: 2, Funny

    J0 3570Y 4 N371Z3N0 comeon, we're already halfway there towards a language that everybody on the planet understands equally poorly. l33t-sp33k can be the lingua franka of the digital age.

    1. Re:net-speranto by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      leet-speek is the new 35P3R4NT0

    2. Re:net-speranto by lha2 · · Score: 1

      Should be j0 50y, unless you are a p053r.

      Estar is for transitory states. Ser is for identity.

  6. Language barrier by magicslax · · Score: 2, Interesting

    One of the great Geek Goals of science fication has been on the fly translation. If technology continues to improve as quickly as it has, I predict real time, accurate (eh....relatively) language conversion for www material and perhaps even instant messaging type applications.

    A growing Chinese user base and the currently massive English speaking web community would certainly create a market for such an app.

    1. Re:Language barrier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This would be more popular in Europe where there are so many different languages spoken that have evolved beyond dialects of each other.

    2. Re:Language barrier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MultiCity.com already has chats with instant translation built in, not the best, but it gets the job done.

    3. Re:Language barrier by Nau.dk · · Score: 1

      A growing Chinese user base and the currently massive English speaking web community would certainly create a market for such an app.


      And the fact that Chinese gramma is very simple compared to most western countries makes it easier to make English->Chinese translating software.

    4. Re:Language barrier by Jormundgard · · Score: 1

      Nearly everyone speaks English in Europe anyway, especially internet and other computer users.

  7. There may be a lot of tea in China... by Agent+Green · · Score: 1

    ...but unless we start making a strong move towards IP6 in the not-so-distant future, there won't be enough IPs for that many people.

    The highest block released now is 220/8, which is in the hands of APNIC. :) Four more Class A's left in Class C space!

    -A.G.-

    --
    // Agent Green (Ian / IU7 / KB1JQO)
    // IEEE 802.3: All 10base Are Belong To Us
    1. Re:There may be a lot of tea in China... by tin_the_fatty · · Score: 2, Informative
      Having used a prepaid-dialup-top-up ISP card in Southern China a few weeks back, I can confirm that the dialup server gives out non-routable IP numbers (i.e. 192.168.X.X), and I expect most ISPs in China to do the same thing regarding dialup and ADSL users.

      So, yes I agree we would be better off going IPv6, but no we could make do for a few years to come.

    2. Re:There may be a lot of tea in China... by nahojd · · Score: 1

      An interesting figure for comparison is that Japan has the same amount of IP4-addresses as SUNET (Swedish University Network, www.sunet.se). That's right. Japan have their own /16-network. That would make more than 0.0005 IP:s for each inhabitant!

    3. Re:There may be a lot of tea in China... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But... If there are not going to be enough IP's.. Can't we used boiled wontons, that would give us another class a atleast

  8. Well, it may mean we have this... by TDScott · · Score: 1, Funny

    ÚÒÚ!

    (That's Babelfish's Chinese translation of First Post.)

  9. Surely, but.. by Zarathustra.fi · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Ni hao,

    statistically speaking it might be, but I believe all the business is still being made with plain English, and a normal western surfer won't notice the difference in his daily net chores.

    Maybe a lot of computers in the Internet reside inside the Chinese borders, but what I hear their firewalling policies etc. somewhat limit access and thus any cultural influence through the Internet.

    So, will this only be an interesting sidenote in the history of the Internet?

    --
    __
    Zarathustra.fi
    Modern man has no goal, no aim, no ideals.
    1. Re:Surely, but.. by cscx · · Score: 1
      Maybe a lot of computers in the Internet reside inside the Chinese borders, but what I hear their firewalling policies etc. somewhat limit access and thus any cultural influence through the Internet.

      Right. I believe that almost all non-government connections in China have to go through proxy servers. But, I think some other countries do this as well (the UAE? correct me if I'm wrong)...

    2. Re:Surely, but.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Maybe a lot of computers in the Internet reside inside the Chinese borders, but what I hear their firewalling policies etc. somewhat limit access and thus any cultural influence through the Internet.

      Um, there are other countries with significant numbers of Chinese speakers out there. There's Taiwan, Singapore, Hong Kong (not a country but aren't behind the firewall), etc. Yes, no influence whatsoever.

  10. Slight mistake in the article by J.D.+Hogg · · Score: 5, Funny
    "Western news sites including CNN, the BBC and Reuters are routinely blocked"

    Since when CNN is a news site ? I see similarities between Chinese people who read the People's Daily and westerners who watch CNN.

    1. Re:Slight mistake in the article by Phroggy · · Score: 4, Funny

      Since when CNN is a news site ?

      When comparing it to Slashdot.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    2. Re:Slight mistake in the article by Happy+go+Lucky · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Since when CNN is a news site ? I see similarities between Chinese people who read the People's Daily and westerners who watch CNN.

      There's a critical difference.

      In the US/Europe/Australia/the civilized world in general, people actually have the choice to read the People's Daily or whatever. When I was in college during the Reagan Years, the only problem I had with getting copies of Pravda or Izvestia was that the local newsstand didn't want to waste shelf space on publications in Russian. And I learned Spanish by listening to Radio Havana.

      The cops didn't kick down my door for reading Communist bullshit or listening to it on the radio. RH wasn't jammed by the government. And if the Chinese People's Daily is online, there's nothing stopping you from finding it other than their webmaster's incompetence.

      Think someone in China could lay hands on the Wall Street Journal's op-ed page or the Economist so easily and with so few repercussions?

      Take Ed Abbey's masterpiece, _The Brave Cowboy_. In it, no end of trouble is caused by the fact that the protagonists/heroes refused to pay taxes, carry ID, or be drafted. Ten buck in any decent bricks-and-mortar bookstore in the US. And I'll just bet that China has no trouble whatsoever with such subversive books floating around.

      Or we can look at the books which portray the US as a corrupt, decaying empire. Heinlein's _TMIAHM_ or Pournelle's _High Justice_ or Falkenberg's Legion series. Or psuedo-subversive nonfiction like Noam Chomsky's garbage. All of it sold openly and completely unrestricted in the US. And I dare you to try to translate it into Mandarin and distribute it in China.

      Most Americans are idiots, maybe. I don't agree with that statement, but it has been made and defended here on /. Two or three generations of television and a generation of computer/video games have made our culture a culture of people who sit around, accept the entertainment given them, and make no effort to learn beyond what's presented to them. And they end up with the attention span long enough to last from one commercial break to the next on the TV news. And as a result, CNN and most other major news outlets in the US tailor their material to the short attention span crowd. And some people claim that the news is doctored to some degree to meet the wishes of co-owners or advertisers. I mean, would WB News carry an expose about how Time Magazine can't get anything right? Would NBC (or MSNBC) go in-depth about what a bloated, spying POS Windows XP is? I'm not holding my breath.

      But there's a distinction to be made. Here in the US, we CAN have better if we want it. It's a matter of just getting a decent newspaper, the BBC World Service on shortwave, or whatever. It takes more effort than turning on the latest insipid bullshit from WB/SeeBS/FOX/ABC/Whatever, but it's there.

      There are plenty of countries where that's not an option. You WILL get your news from politically-acceptable sources. You WILL view only acceptable web sites. And if you don't, then you can be dragged off to die in a slave labor camp or shot with your spouse billed for the ammunition. And China is exactly that kind of fascist rathole.

      Oops, that was a bit of a rant. Sorry about that.

    3. Re:Slight mistake in the article by mizhi · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "There are plenty of countries where that's not an option. You WILL get your news from politically-acceptable sources. You WILL view only acceptable web sites. And if you don't, then you can be dragged off to die in a slave labor camp or shot with your spouse billed for the ammunition. And China is exactly that kind of fascist rathole."

      Hmmm... you know, when I was in China... I had absolutely no problems reading /., going to the drudgereport, or accessing my mail. That's not to say that censorship does not exist in China, and their TV news shows most definitely present a slanted view of the world; especially the US... BUT, I think that the Western world gets its own healthy dose of propaganda and whenever I hear stuff about China that is of the ilk "China is a big, nasty evil country.", I question it now. Ofcourse, my ex-gf's father would tell her that certain topics could not be discussed safely over the phone, but then he would send it to her over mediaring... :-/ Perhaps I didn't stay there long enough, but my short stay there made a couple impressions on me... (1) We have alot of propoganda about China that is misleading or downright false (2) Chinese are some of the most capitalistic sobs I've ever met.

      --
      Humorless sig goes here.
    4. Re:Slight mistake in the article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chinese are some of the most capitalistic sobs I've ever met

      It's kind of hard to be capitalist without property rights...

    5. Re:Slight mistake in the article by Happy+go+Lucky · · Score: 1
      Hmmm... you know, when I was in China... I had absolutely no problems reading /., going to the drudgereport, or accessing my mail. That's not to say that censorship does not exist in China, and their TV news shows most definitely present a slanted view of the world; especially the US...

      I don't doubt it. And I know that most US media isn't that useful either. However, I'm paid to be paranoid and I take my cues from other people who are also paid to be paranoid. We're taught to evaluate people in terms of their abilities, and not their intentions. If a government has the power to block a website, then one is right to worry. If the power is there, then the intention can change on a whim. I can get to an Amnesty International website very easily-sit down at a web browser and I'm about thirty keystrokes away. And the US government doesn't have a whole lot of power to shut it down. I can get to American Indian Movement sites and the various socialist loonies just as easily, without being easily monitored. How hard was it to get to a Free Tibet site over there?

      Or, I hate to use this example, because I think the central figure should have visited a gas chamber some years ago, but imagine a Chinese cop gets murdered. How big an internet campaign would there be over there to make a folk hero out of his killer? In other words, imagine a Chinese Mumia. Would he give graduation speeches from death row the way the real Mumia does here?

      I don't know if you've ever read Tom Clancy's latest bore, _The Bear and the Dragon_. If you have, how much truth is there to his description of their population-control policy? It's consistent with info from some other human-rights groups, but if you've been there you're a first- or second-hand source which beats the crap out of the third- and fourth-hand sources that I've seen thus far.

      (2) Chinese are some of the most capitalistic sobs I've ever met.

      Capitalism, alas, doesn't necessarily imply freedom-loving. The vast majority of the Pacific Rim economic powerhouses (Singapore, Japan, California) prove that well enough IMHO. I personally think they should go hand-in-hand, but there are enough governments on this planet that only recognize freedom when it involves the freedom to make a buck (and pay taxes on it).

    6. Re:Slight mistake in the article by Ivan+Raikov · · Score: 2

      I see similarities between Chinese people who read the People's Daily and westerners who watch CNN.

      Hehe, that reminds of an old anecdote from days past. Khrushchev and Kennedy (or pick your favorite Cold War-era leaders) were once arguing about whose political system is better. Kennedy says, "In our country, every citizen is free to express their discontent with the government -- anybody can yell 'Down with Kennedy' in front of the White House!"
      "Big deal," retorts Khrushchev. "Anybody in Russia can go to the Red Square, and yell 'Down with Kennedy,' as well!"

    7. Re:Slight mistake in the article by odaiwai · · Score: 2

      Or, I hate to use this example, because I think the central figure should have visited a gas chamber some years ago, but imagine a Chinese cop gets murdered. How big an internet campaign would there be over there to make a folk hero out of his killer?

      He'd be executed in very short order.

      I don't know if you've ever read Tom Clancy's latest bore, _The Bear and the Dragon_. If you have, how much truth is there to his description of their population-control policy?

      If thats the one child policy then it's complete bull. My wife, a mainland chinese, is the oldest of six. Her younger brother has three kids, and he works for the chinese government.

      The one child policy is a fiction which is applied close to Beijing, but not in other places. dave

    8. Re:Slight mistake in the article by Tackhead · · Score: 1
      > RH wasn't jammed by the government.

      You Know You've Been Hacking Too Long When...

      ...you think "Huh? Since when did Red Hat have a transmitter?"

    9. Re:Slight mistake in the article by mizhi · · Score: 2
      Or, I hate to use this example, because I think the central figure should have visited a gas chamber some years ago, but imagine a Chinese cop gets murdered. How big an internet campaign would there be over there to make a folk hero out of his killer? In other words, imagine a Chinese Mumia. Would he give graduation speeches from death row the way the real Mumia does here?

      He would have been tried, convicted, sentenced, and executed in a very short amount of time. Personally, the speed of execution in China is something that appeals to me; but their due process is something that I have not looked deeply at and would have grave doubts about.

      I don't know if you've ever read Tom Clancy's latest bore, _The Bear and the Dragon_. If you have, how much truth is there to his description of their population-control policy? It's consistent with info from some other human-rights groups, but if you've been there you're a first- or second-hand source which beats the crap out of the third- and fourth-hand sources that I've seen thus far.

      I've never read the book, but there are alot of myths about populations control. In the large cities, such as Tianjin, Beijing, and Shanghai, the one child policy is enforced pretty rigorously. However, in the countryside where much of the work involves manual labor, the one child policy is only sporadically enforced. I didn't really visit the countryside though; that is second-hand information from my ex-girlfriend (Chinese national) and a few Chinese friends. And while I'm at it, I want to kill another myth about Chinese babies; I didn't see a single abondoned girl baby in China. Maybe I went to the wrong places though. China is an interesting country in that the cities are very advanced while the countryside is lagging far behind. We have it in the US too, but it seems to be on a larger scale there.

      Capitalism, alas, doesn't necessarily imply freedom-loving. The vast majority of the Pacific Rim economic powerhouses (Singapore, Japan, California) prove that well enough IMHO. I personally think they should go hand-in-hand, but there are enough governments on this planet that only recognize freedom when it involves the freedom to make a buck (and pay taxes on it).

      I agree, I didn't mean to confuse the official Chinese government policy or the idea of personal liberties and economics. It was an observation of mine that still amuses me... if you're white; eg: western, you are percieved as having alot of money. And I suppose most do in comparison to the average Chinese citizen, so the stereotype is not unfounded. What happens then is that people will try to enthusiastically sell you overpriced things. I had to tell more than a few people "Bu yao, jiu bu mai." (I don't want it, so I won't buy it.) So my perception is that the individual Chinese is very capitalistic, but they have a weird mix of Socialism, Fascism, and Capitalism.

      --
      Humorless sig goes here.
    10. Re:Slight mistake in the article by mizhi · · Score: 2
      If thats the one child policy then it's complete bull. My wife, a mainland chinese, is the oldest of six. Her younger brother has three kids, and he works for the chinese government.
      The one child policy is a fiction which is applied close to Beijing, but not in other places.

      It also depends on when she was born. My ex-girlfriend (Mainland Chinese) was born in 1980, a year after the one-child policy was enacted. She has no brothers or sisters. On the other hand, I know a few Chinese people who were born before 1979 and have one or two siblings who were also born before 1979, but they don't have anymore after that. I believe in rural areas the policy is only sporadically enforced. Also, if you work for the government... well, not to cast aspersions on your family, but you can get perks.

      --
      Humorless sig goes here.
    11. Re:Slight mistake in the article by hawk · · Score: 2
      1st--this is by far the most thoughtful thing I've seen on slashdot in a very long time.


      Second:
      >Or we can look at the books which portray the US
      >as a corrupt, decaying empire. Heinlein's
      > _TMIAHM_ or Pournelle's _High Justice_ or
      >Falkenberg's Legion series.


      At the time they were written, that was pretty close to an objective position. Pournelle in particular simply extrapolated from then-current social trends. However, he was anything but anti-american--within a couple of years of his "fall of the west" works, he was once of the science people in the Reagan administration. He was part of the faction within the administration pushing for SDI *not* so much as an actual defense, but *because* they saw (correctly, in hindsight) it leading to the bankruptcy of the Soviet system as they triedto keep up. (Nixon wrote some similar things in the early 80's about the arms race, but I don't think he actually *avocated* the policy).


      Under a repressive system, Pournelle's works would have been repressed. Instead, the patriot's harsh criticism became part of th esolution.


      hawk

    12. Re:Slight mistake in the article by Anonymous+Coed · · Score: 1

      My understanding is that it is a fiction that applies only to those too poor to pay bribes to their local "comrade."

    13. Re:Slight mistake in the article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wouldn't it be the other way around? You've been hacking to long when someone says RH and you think Robert Heinlein?

      Robert Heinlein wrote sci-fi books before you were an itch in your pappy's pants.

    14. Re:Slight mistake in the article by drovar · · Score: 0

      Silly, you're thinking of FoxNews.

    15. Re:Slight mistake in the article by mrbnsn · · Score: 1
      "Oops, that was a bit of a rant. Sorry about that."

      It would have been a much better rant if you actually knew what you were talking about.

      Both the Economist and (Asian) Wall Street Journal are widely available in China in their print editions, and the online versions are unblocked, thus freely available to some 20 million current Chinese Internet users.

      Back to the drawing board with that geopolitical analysis.

      "You WILL view only acceptable web sites. And if you don't, then you can be dragged off to die in a slave labor camp or shot with your spouse billed for the ammunition. And China is exactly that kind of fascist rathole."

      <yoda>Fascist? Rathole? My home this is!</yoda>

      And, like most people who've never been here, you've got it all wrong. Mostly because all you know about China is what you've seen in the Western press. Think about that for a while, and then re-read your rant.

  11. What about programming languages? by ssheth · · Score: 5, Insightful

    While the content produced will increasingly come in many different languages as we move forward over the next few years, I still see little movement on the actual programming front.
    Today, 99% of all programming is still done in English which ends up giving a definite bias towards English as the language of the web.

    If someone comes out with some programming language that can be programmed in local languages and which gets popular, that is when I see a real shift happening in the base of the web. Otherwise, the content producer still ends up embedding their original language content inside English HTML .. which ends up meaning that he/she also must understand English, thereby limiting the scope of the Web to those who at least have a passing knowledge of English.

    1. Re:What about programming languages? by magicslax · · Score: 1

      You forget WYSIWYG editors. Perhaps that should be restated to read that 99% of well coded content will be in English. The point is that anybody with the right tools will have access to the internet, and the right tools will exist shortly.

      Not everybody is a programmer, just the best of us :-)

    2. Re:What about programming languages? by linca · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Are you saying that HTML is in English?

      Knowing the very few words needed to "program" in HTML is very far from speaking English. Many of my friends can program, but don't speak English. Programming is certainly not done in any natural language ; understanding english and mastering HTML are two very diferrent things.

    3. Re:What about programming languages? by magicslax · · Score: 1

      It sure can't help to know what 'color' or 'font' means, though. Especially if this is not your native alphabet - not to mention the problem of different keysets. Input could be difficult.

      I guess I just feel like playing the devil's advocate today. eh.

    4. Re:What about programming languages? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HTML isn't a programming language. It does not contain conditional branching.

    5. Re:What about programming languages? by Xerion · · Score: 0

      What makes you think an average English speaker can distinguish the difference between TD and TR??

      My point is that knowing english helps one to learn how to program, but does not really prevent non-english speakers from learning it quickly.

    6. Re:What about programming languages? by ender81b · · Score: 1

      part of the problem (for an chinese perspective) is that the HTML/XML/ETc tags have to be in English otherwise the browsers won't translate right (as well as being the W3C standard.

      Meaning, in affect, you have to know some english to develop the webpages anyways.

    7. Re:What about programming languages? by ender81b · · Score: 1

      Except when you consider the problem from a language (syntax perspective). Most chinese keyboards are very, very different. from Roman Char. keyboards. Chinese keyboards contain hundreds of different component symbols to make up the language. Which means that the average web programmer would either have to remap his keyboard for roman characters to program in HTML or switch keyboards all together.

      The WWW has done more to advance Enlish as the 'universal language' than anything other than (perhaps) US's status as superpower.

    8. Re:What about programming languages? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Knowing what "font" or "color" really means is irrelevant. Knowing what it does in HTML is the only important thing - it'll help you to learn html, maybe, but once you know "color" (or "quisick" or anything else) changes the color, you can change the color. You can program in C++ and not know why malloc is named malloc - hell, most programming is hardly english, anyway, and without proper teaching, malloc will mean nothing

    9. Re:What about programming languages? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AFAIK, Perl and many scheme and lisp interpreters now allow symbols to be any unicode character - sure, the core language is still "english-like", but any user-defined functions may have names that aren't even ASCII or ISO-8859-1 - same goes for some C compilers, and, kindof, Java (you're supposed to run any non-ascii java source through the "native2ascii" tool supplied with the jdk before passing it to javac)

    10. Re:What about programming languages? by autopr0n · · Score: 2

      (you're supposed to run any non-ascii java source through the "native2ascii" tool supplied with the jdk before passing it to javac)

      Really? javac -encoding seemed to work fine before.

      --
      autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    11. Re:What about programming languages? by Skald · · Score: 2
      You don't really need a programming language to do this... nor do I see that the existence of such a language would help all that much. Now a markup language... that's a different story. I still don't think the barrier's that great, but it'd be good to have the capability. And XML fits the bill here. Declare the right character set, and you're off and running.


      Of course, browsers really aren't there yet... but things do look promising. Mozilla supports XML -- to a certain, rather limited, extent -- and I'm told that IE does too. CSS is not implemented in Unicode, however, so you'd have a heck of a time adding presentation information to Chinese markup, particularly in Chinese. But then there's XSL. Which is not there yet either, but seems like it will be in time. If not quickly, in much less time than it'll take for a significant portion of a billion Chinese folks to get PCs.


      While on the topic, though, a localized mainstream programming language would be nice, too. We wouldn't want to keep people from leveraging their micro-marketed e-commerce solutions with the data warehousing of feedback from dynamic interactive e-communities just because they write Sanskrit, would we?


      To do this, you'd really need to have a language with native unicode support. You'd want to be able to change operators and keywords to native glyphs, mutating their syntax along the way. The language itself might be more useful as well if you could overload or override the builtins, as well as define your own operators, subs, and what-have-you.


      Overall, sounds like Perl6.


      Which can be a good or a bad thing, depending on your perspective... oddly, not everybody likes chaos and mayhem... but it fits the bill. After all, Larry continually jokes about turning Perl into APL... :-)

      --

      "The best we can hope for concerning the people at large is that they be properly armed." - Alexander Hamilton

    12. Re:What about programming languages? by CatherineCornelius · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Today, 99% of all programming is still done in English which ends up giving a definite bias towards English as the language of the web.

      I don't know about you, but most of _my_ programming is in C or SQL, both of which owe far more to calculus and algebra than to any natural language. The idea that these are comparable to variants or dialects of English is absurd.

    13. Re:What about programming languages? by wangi · · Score: 3, Informative

      It makes absolutely no difference at all to the vast majority (say 99% at least) what their software is coded in, or what markup language looks like.

      They're interested in content for some strange reason...

      Are you really trying to say that if HTML is English-based then ALL Chinese have to have minimal English experience? I don't thik so...

    14. Re:What about programming languages? by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 2

      They're not variants or dialects of English, but --

      if

      else

      do

      while

      select

      from

      where

      -- are all a whole lot more obvious if you know what the words mean in everyday (English) usage.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    15. Re:What about programming languages? by 3seas · · Score: 2

      What is a programming language but a man created abstraction set, syntax, semantics that gets TRANSLATED into that which a binary based machine can understand.

      The Translation mechanics or machinery is the same, whether you are translating human language to machine language or Human Language to Human language.

      Language is not the issue, TRANSLATION is!

      This is one place where computer science needs to get back to being a genuine science. But in doing so, the whole field of computer programming will have to change. Psuedo Programming will become something of the past as Auto-coding replaces it. Genuine Software Engineering will become The Skill it has yet to be recognized completely for. And thru the tools of Software engineering, many things even outside coding will be done, such as establishing human to human translations, along with natural human to machine translations.

      What human language you use to generate machine code is as open as it can be defined to be. For that is how we create a language - word = definition! And that can be some chinese character sequence = selected HTML tag....

      see my home page...

    16. Re:What about programming languages? by Mike+Schiraldi · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Recognizable keywords in your native lanugage aren't necessary at all. Ever use assembly language?

      XDR 0, 3
      PME 9, AX
      LLA AX, AH
      WNV BX, AX
      BCO 0, AX

      Think about Unix: How long did it take you to learn that "cat" means "display some text"? About a second? Yeah, that's about as long as it would take someone who spoke only German.

    17. Re:What about programming languages? by laserjet · · Score: 2

      To ilustrate this, I am testing software, and the defect only occurs in a German release of HPUX, so we have one unix box that is installed with the German version. They keyes are all fsucked up (hit 'z' get 'y', hit SHITT+7 to get '/'), etc. But it only took me a little while to become proficient and pick out what their words meant (esp. the common ones like OK, Cancel, Help, etc).

      --
      Moon Macrosystems. Sun's biggest competitor.
    18. Re:What about programming languages? by szomb · · Score: 1

      Think about Unix: How long did it take you to learn that "cat" means "display some text"?

      cat means "catenate", not "display some text". cat will work regardless of whether the input is actually text, regardless of whether the output is actually a display. It makes sense.

      --
      Just because a few of us can read write and do a little math, doesn't mean we deserve to conquer the universe
    19. Re:What about programming languages? by szomb · · Score: 1

      Uhh...one would assume that a professional programmer would have at least some formal education in his belt, and in most non-English-speaking countries English is one of those things they teach you in school. Certainly you don't have to learn the entire language to know what words like 'where' mean.

      --
      Just because a few of us can read write and do a little math, doesn't mean we deserve to conquer the universe
    20. Re:What about programming languages? by CatherineCornelius · · Score: 2, Insightful
      if else [etc] are all a whole lot more obvious if you know what the words mean in everyday (English) usage

      Sure, and it helps to understand what how the Greek sigma symbol is pronounced if you want to do math. This doesn't mean you need to learn Greek, or to understand a word of the language. The observation that programming is an activity performed in English is simply incorrect. One might as well claim that reverse polish calculators are programmed in German or Japanese, because the verb comes after the subject and the object in those languages.

    21. Re:What about programming languages? by geekster · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's just commands wich happens to be taken from the english language.
      I wouldn't really like to program like this:

      hvis(a >= 10)
      {
      }
      ellers
      {
      gør
      {
      a++;
      }imens(a < 10);
      }

      Then again, choice is good. But I would just hate to work on an open source project with the source code in some, for me, strange foreign language. That would mean I'd not only have to learn C/C++ but perhaps C/C++/german, C/C++/russian, C/C++/chineese, etc.

    22. Re:What about programming languages? by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      Most chinese keyboards are very, very different. from Roman Char. keyboards. Chinese keyboards contain hundreds of different component symbols to make up the language. Which means that the average web programmer would either have to remap his keyboard for roman characters to program in HTML or switch keyboards all together.

      Who told you this rubbish? In China they use exactly the same 102/4 key QWERTY keyboards. The only difference is that on the keycap aside from the Latin letter will be some Chinese characters or radicals that are used in one of several input methods.

      I worked on a website run by a Beijing company. The editors use MS Word for both Chinese and English text. The programmers used Windows, C, Visual Basic atc (they love MS software), the designers used Dreamweaver. They couldn't comment their code intelligibly, which is also exactly the same.

    23. Re:What about programming languages? by Jamuraa · · Score: 1

      Lets think about it for a but.

      I played the trumpet for about 6 yars of my life. I would routinely play works that required me to know italian. fortissimo, vibrato, etc. It didn't bother me in the slightest. I knew what the words meant because I was tought.

      It's fairly simple to look at english and programming in the same way.

      --
      You can't see this if you have sigs turned off.
    24. Re:What about programming languages? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But... because you already knew how to read english, and italian uses the same roman characters as english, you could read and pronouce the words before you knew what they meant. That's not the case with most asian languages, which often aren't even printable on an english only platform. See the post at the start of this message - did you see chinese characters, or a pile of junk that means nothing to anyone ?

      There are ways you can represent chinese in english (eg "ni hao"), and one of the common input methods is to type "n,i, ,h,a,o" to tell the computer what chinese characters you want it to display, but for many languages, there are no standard ways of entering words using english letters, so you must first learn the alphabet (if it has one), or 1000's of glyphs (if it doesn't).

    25. Re:What about programming languages? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if else [etc] are all a whole lot more obvious if you know what the words mean in everyday (English) usage

      Sure, and it helps to understand what how the Greek sigma symbol is pronounced if you want to do math. This doesn't mean you need to learn Greek, or to understand a word of the language.


      Best example I've seen yet in this thread. Should clue in a few others in this thread.

    26. Re:What about programming languages? by oliverk · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and regex -- who the hell can read that?!?

      --
      ---- Please be nice in case my Slashdot karma ~= my real life karma.
    27. Re:What about programming languages? by Mike+Schiraldi · · Score: 2

      Yeah, we all realize that. My point is that, when you're sitting at a terminal and trying to view a text file, you need to learn the command. Don't tell me you said, "Gee, i need to catenate that file to nothing. Oh, and the command is 'cat'! I'm so glad i speak English, because otherwise that would have been counterintuitive."

      The command might as well have been "rqszx"

    28. Re:What about programming languages? by psamuels · · Score: 1
      part of the problem (for an chinese perspective) is that the HTML/XML/ETc tags have to be in English otherwise the browsers won't translate right (as well as being the W3C standard.

      OK, what does <A HREF=...> mean in English? Look it up: "A" - indefinite article. No help at all - you have to know it really stands for "anchor". HREF - not a word at all, you have to know it's short for "hypertext reference".

      Now COBOL, on the other hand.......

      --
      "How can you claim that you are anti-crack, while still writing a window manager?" — Metacity README
    29. Re:What about programming languages? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's not catenated to nothing! it's catenated to stdout! (by default) silly persun! of course we all know that stdout means sexually transmitted disease output. (otherwise known as "standard output")

    30. Re:What about programming languages? by Banjonardo · · Score: 1
      ok, my example: In Brasil, programmers say these words and either know or memorize what they mean. (Bad example; middle class and up Brasilians, who are the programmers, usually take some form of English)

      But name your variables in another language, comment in another language, or just use Perl: it's not like English at all.

      --

      -----

      Score 3? For what? Being wrong, at length? - smirkleton

    31. Re:What about programming languages? by Banjonardo · · Score: 1
      Okeinentaggen

      Cancelstrummen

      Helpentaggen

      Blink enlichten

      --

      -----

      Score 3? For what? Being wrong, at length? - smirkleton

    32. Re:What about programming languages? by krygny · · Score: 1

      I used to think that in 100 years, nearly everyone in the World (except for inhabitants of the most undeveloped countries) will speak English fluently. I don't think that any more. 50 years tops. Two to three generations for non-English speaking netizens to die off. Remember that everyone in India, the US, the UK, Canada, Australia, and almost everyone in Continental Europe and Africa already speak English (and not Chinese). Do the math.

      Latin America and Japan are the last bastions of resistence. When I last looked, neither was doing very well economically. I wonder why.

      --
      Research shows that 67% of those who use the term "research shows", are just making shit up.
    33. Re:What about programming languages? by szomb · · Score: 1

      No, but once someone tells you, it's fairly easy to remember that cat is just short for catenate. By contrast, if the command had been rqszx, I personally would probably have to write it down somewhere for a long time before I could use it off the top of my head...

      --
      Just because a few of us can read write and do a little math, doesn't mean we deserve to conquer the universe
    34. Re:What about programming languages? by Mike+Schiraldi · · Score: 2

      I don't know about you, but i had no idea what catenate meant until i came across "cat". And in C, i don't remember "malloc" as "memory allocate", i remember it because it sounds like the name of an Aztec god who will grant you great things but destroy you if you misuse the gift. It's an apt name for that function.

  12. I think this is the opposite of a problem by Cyberllama · · Score: 1

    China tries to wall off the internet and keep it from "contaminating" the thoughts of its people, but too often they fail. An entire nation trying to firewall itself off from the rest of the internet while simulataneously trying to embrace it? It won't work. Sooner or later I think the current chinese government is going to end, we'll soon see.

    1. Re:I think this is the opposite of a problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Sooner or later I think the current chinese government is going to end, we'll soon see.

      Why? Because western Idealism states that a people should be governed by popular vote and that the populace should not be enslaved by a totalitarian dictatorship with an unclenching Iron fisted grip choking the very freedom that all people are granted by the creator(fat black woman)?

      Hmmm? Hmmm?

  13. Billion citizens != Billion Internet Users by -tji · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The latest UN statistics show China's per-capita income at $798 USD.

    Does that sort of income enable the purchase of a computer, or the recurring costs of a phone line and ISP?

    If it does, then what are the Internet applications driving this incredible influx of mandarin/cantonese users? Without the huge economic/retail motive that drove American adoption, it's hard to see the huge growth in users and services. And, obviously, there is absolutely no way this will happen by 2007, as it says in the article.

    1. Re:Billion citizens != Billion Internet Users by hatchet · · Score: 1

      Those things are cheaper in china... actually almost everything is cheaper in china. A year or so back.. they were making 100% replicas of ASUS motherboards for fraction of cost and sold it at normal price. I still believe they are doing so.. only they do not sell it in mainstream.

    2. Re:Billion citizens != Billion Internet Users by klui · · Score: 1

      Computers may be cheaper in China than the U.S., but the average income in China aren't even close to that in the U.S.

    3. Re:Billion citizens != Billion Internet Users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only one legitimate copy of any software title is ever exported to China. Software is very cheap over there.

    4. Re:Billion citizens != Billion Internet Users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "China's per-capita income at $798 USD"

      Yeah, but over there, they MAKE the PCs. It only costs them like USD$9.95 to build a screaming 1.6 GHz monster!

    5. Re:Billion citizens != Billion Internet Users by dunstan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Erm, I don't expect the growth in internet usage in China to be based on individuals buying windoze PeeCees and using dial up access. Expect it to be based around some sort of appliances, probably in communal facilities in small towns. Remember the small town US mayor who in the early days of telephony confidently predicted "someday *every* town in America will have a telephone". Remember, too, that a couple of days ago we were discussing how the uptake of software libre in China is significantly higher than in the West.

      Dunstan

      --
      The last scintilla of doubt just rode out of town
    6. Re:Billion citizens != Billion Internet Users by jaoswald · · Score: 2

      Two words: internet cafes.

    7. Re:Billion citizens != Billion Internet Users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right on. China wants us to see it as an economic giant. Its great propaganda, but read the history books - this same song and dance has been going on for >200 years. Once China starts down the road to modernity, there will be no stopping it. Yah right.

      China is effectively the same place now as it was under the emperors. There's a thin strata of (relatively) rich people running the place, and >1 billion peasants who will _never_ be able to afford a VCR, let alone a cable net connection.

      Don't buy the lies. Everyone from China whom we meet online is a direct beneficiary of the current system. Of course they defend it and say it's going to make everyone in China rich - it made them rich, right?

    8. Re:Billion citizens != Billion Internet Users by Ami+Ganguli · · Score: 2

      There are a few things to remember:

      • Even if the average per-capita invome is only $798, there are many people who make much more. Income isn't evenly distributed. If only 10% can afford internet access that's still over 100 million people.
      • Taiwan (Mandarine speaking), Hong Kong(Cantonese), are quite wealthy even by Western standards, with Shanghai closing fast.
      • Computers and everything else in China is cheaper than in the west
      • China is developing quickly.

      I can't vouch for 2007, but it passes the sniff test and I'd be inclined to believe it, especially given the fact that the Internet has only taken off in the West since 1995. Another six years for China to catch up is reasonable.

      --
      It is tempting, if the only tool you have is a hammer, to treat everything as if it were a nail. - Abraham Maslow
    9. Re:Billion citizens != Billion Internet Users by 3seas · · Score: 2

      How much does China really need to buy, that they cannot make themselves? (Re: WTO, WIPO)

      Their production and resource cost are going to relative to their economy.

    10. Re:Billion citizens != Billion Internet Users by SaDan · · Score: 1

      Didn't China shut down quite a few internet cafes recently?

      I would think that with their current form of government and their tendancy to want to filter content, this expected growth of Chinese on the internet will not come to pass. There are just too many barriers for that kind of growth.

    11. Re:Billion citizens != Billion Internet Users by jaoswald · · Score: 2

      It's true that internet cafes are at risk from the authorities if they don't police the usage of chat rooms. I think the entrepreneurial impulse in urban China is going to find a way to overcome the political obstacles, perhaps through filtering technology, or more likely by greasing a few palms. Capitalists can officially join the Party now, you know. Still, my main point was to counter the view, which seems to be prevalent in this discussion, that internet users must have their own dial-up connection.

      Internet cafes allow people to get on-line for pocket change; they don't need to foot the bill for a PC and phone line.

    12. Re:Billion citizens != Billion Internet Users by jellybear · · Score: 1

      Chinese is throwing a lot of money into scientific research (eg nanotech). The labs are probably wired up.

  14. Same old language barrier? by ddent · · Score: 3

    Well duh... sorry, that sounds rather america-centric. Do you really expect everyone else to learn english so you don't have to learn anything else?

    1. Re:Same old language barrier? by igor_p · · Score: 1

      Do you really expect everyone else to learn english so you don't have to learn anything else?

      Yes ;)

    2. Re:Same old language barrier? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. Si. Oui. Ja. Sì. Sim.

    3. Re:Same old language barrier? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Canadians, Brits, Australians and New Zealanders also speak the language. The fact that you think English is only an American language proves your jingoism and your imperialistic tendencies.

    4. Re:Same old language barrier? by ender81b · · Score: 1

      >Well duh... sorry, that sounds rather america->centric.
      >Do you really expect everyone else to learn >english so you don't have to learn anything else?

    5. Re:Same old language barrier? by ddent · · Score: 1

      psst. I'm Canadian. :)

    6. Re:Same old language barrier? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you really expect everyone else to learn english so you don't have to learn anything else?

      Actually, most everybody is already learning/has learned english. Do you really expect everyone to start learning a language of a billion oppressed people (only 1/20th of which might use the internet) just so they don't have to learn anything else? I really doubt the language will ever shift, simply because people everywhere fear change, and by the time enough people in China use the net (unfiltered mind you, so they can be heard in order to influence the rest of the world) Enlglish will probably be even more dominant in the world than it is now. Sorry to be all US-centric, but that is just the way things shaped up.

    7. Re:Same old language barrier? by sql*kitten · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well duh... sorry, that sounds rather america-centric. Do you really expect everyone else to learn english so you don't have to learn anything else?

      Actually, yes I do. English speakers, whether or not that was the mother tongue of all the individuals involved, after all, developed practically all the technology involved. English is the lingua franca of international commerce. Air traffic control and hotel concierges all over the world speak English. Engineers in many disciplines use English terminology, even if the rest of their communication is in their native language, and international academic journals are published in English. Esperanto was a nice idea (I even learnt basic conversation in it once) but English, with maybe French (which I speak, altho' not fluently) or Spanish for backup, is the de facto common tongue, and will enable you to travel or to business almost anywhere in the world. Remember that English is not a static language, it freely adopts words and phrases from other languages as required. It can be both precise and expressive, as required.

      Maybe (relatively) few Chinese speak English, but relatively few Chinese even speak to non-Chinese at all. That country is not a cultural and linguistic "melting pot" like the US or UK, it is remarkably homogenous for such a large country. The question really is, will the Chinese become like us, or will they choose an isolationist policy? And don't forget, Chinese characters are available on computers at all because Western corporations decided that they should be - we are being as accomodating as we possibly can! If the Chinese want their own information infrastructure, they are free to create it for themselves - or they can choose to use ours, which we are making available freely. Why is America always the bad guy in cultural discussions?

      Besides, there are purely technical reasons why English is a "better" language than Chinese for computing - look at the numbers of characters in the alphabets, for example. English words are distinct, Chinese ideograms are much more dependent on context and the interpretation of the listener.

    8. Re:Same old language barrier? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about the Irish? They speak English. They used to have Gaelic like the Scots but those Anglo-Saxons always spreading their language with the sword!

    9. Re:Same old language barrier? by ddent · · Score: 2

      *sigh* There is truth to both your comment and the one below... I say this as an english speaker myself (as well as french), but I kind of feel bad that english is taking away other people's cultures slowly but surely.

    10. Re:Same old language barrier? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      but I kind of feel bad that english is taking away other people's cultures slowly but surely.

      Shut the fuck up frog. English is not taking away anybody's culture. Is that the fucking socialist propaganda they teach you over there in frogland?

    11. Re:Same old language barrier? by cockeater · · Score: 0

      Remember that English is not a static language, it freely adopts words and phrases from other languages as required. It can be both precise and expressive, as required.

      How exactly are either of these points unique to English? And for the first argument, havn't most languages adopted words in the technical field from English?

      Sorry, I didn't mean to flame.

    12. Re:Same old language barrier? by Big+Dogs+Cock · · Score: 0

      Maybe the Americans should learn English first. Once you've mastered the correct spelling of "colour", "honour", "arse" etc. Then you might want to stop using words which do not exist such as "planful" and "summarization". Finally, you can stop using nouns as verbs - eg "leverage".

      --
      "Under the iron bridge, we fist" - The Smiths, Still Ill
    13. Re:Same old language barrier? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      learn how to spell aluminum first, landlubber

    14. Re:Same old language barrier? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If more Canadian's were like Don Cherry I wouldn't despise Canada. If I have one good thing to say about Canada it's that you guys play football the way god intended, at least partially.

    15. Re:Same old language barrier? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>ddent: "Well duh... sorry, that sounds rather america-centric. Do you really expect everyone else to learn english so you don't have to learn anything else?"

      >>sql*kitten: "Actually, yes I do. English speakers, whether or not that was the mother tongue of all the individuals involved, after all, developed practically all the technology involved. "

      Surely you jest? Do you feel you should decide what language China or any other nation speaks? We must inform the Chinese leaders that sql*kitten of slashdot objects to them choosing their linguistic destiny! Please Chinese people adopt English, so sql*kitten does not have to learn Mandarin.

      Go read some more of that Ayn Raynd libel and come back. Also if you ever see her ghost please tell her that the Soviets were not Socialists. I never saw the workers controlling the means of production in the USSR, so please tell her this. Maybe she can have some 'objectivism' after that. Also I am onto the fact that she hated facial hair because Vladimir Ilich Lenin had that stylish goatee and moustache.

    16. Re:Same old language barrier? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I really like Greek the spelling system is easy. If you can pronounce a word in Greek you can spell it. It would be nice if English was not such a pellmell when it comes to grammar and spelling.

      Take the word bourgeoise. If you try to pronounce it as it is spelled you will spell it wrong. You have to memorize how to spell and pronounce it. When they adopted that word from French they should have spelled it with English orthography, really. In Greek when you learn a new word you only need to know how to pronounce it and you can spell it since there are so few words that break orthography.

    17. Re:Same old language barrier? by Red+Eyes · · Score: 1
      And don't forget, Chinese characters are available on computers at all because Western corporations decided that they should be - we are being as accomodating as we possibly can!

      That is absolute bullshit. The person who initiated work on bringing Chinese characters onto computing was born in Taiwan. I can't remember his name or where I heard about him from, but I think he's somehow related to American iceskater Michelle Kwan. Anyway, it wasn't some western corporation that did it, it was an entrepenuer who say a market that wasn't being fullfilled by said western corporations.

      If the Chinese want their own information infrastructure, they are free to create it for themselves - or they can choose to use ours, which we are making available freely.

      What do you think the firewall is for? They're building the infrastructure, but realise it's silly to not allow users to interface with other infrastructures.

    18. Re:Same old language barrier? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Deine Arroganz ist wirklich ungeheuerlich
      Kaj esperanto ne estis sed estas "nice idea".
      Nenio epoko eterne restos - nur pripensu kial "lingua franca!" ne longe estas franca lingvo.

    19. Re:Same old language barrier? by Kiwi · · Score: 2
      Actually, yes I do. English speakers, whether or not that was the mother tongue of all the individuals involved, after all, developed practically all the technology involved. English is the lingua franca of international commerce. Air traffic control and hotel concierges all over the world speak English.

      Keep in mind that English is a very hard language to learn for fornigners for two reasons:

      • English has nearly 200 phonetic sounds, which can not be learned unless one learns the sounds as a little kid.
      • English has horrible spelling
      My experience is that, while many people in fornign countries are taking English classes, they usually have an accent too thick to be readily understandable, and are, generally speaking, nowhere fluent in English.

      For example, in the town am in right now, it is nearly impossible (if not impossible) to purchase an English-language newspaper.

      While tourist areas currently have people who can speak something which resembles English, once one gets off the beaten path in a foreign country, one needs to have a working knowledge of the language.

      Another thing: Those statistics that say "XXX million people in the world speak English" are based on the assumption that someone who has taken a single English course in a night school "speaks English". It would be like saying that sql*kitten speaks Esperanto.

      Finally, Esperanto is alive and well, thank you very much.

      - Sam

      --

      The secret to enjoying Slashdot is to realize that it should not be taken too seriously.

    20. Re:Same old language barrier? by Kiwi · · Score: 1
      English will probably be even more dominant in the world than it is now.

      That is what they said about French 100 years ago.

      - Sam

      --

      The secret to enjoying Slashdot is to realize that it should not be taken too seriously.

    21. Re:Same old language barrier? by (void*) · · Score: 2, Insightful
      That country is not a cultural and linguistic "melting pot" like the US or UK, it is remarkably homogenous for such a large country. The question really is, will the Chinese become like us, or will they choose an isolationist policy?
      Saying China is not a melting pot betrays exactly the kind of blind ignorance of Chinese history. China has had 5000 years of history. The written language was standardized for longer than English was chosen as the lingua franca. These are very good reason for the Chinese to be proud. But many are not. In fact, many are eagerly learning English! Think about that, and stop adopting the heads in sands approach, my American friend.
      And don't forget, Chinese characters are available on computers at all because Western corporations decided that they should be - we are being as accomodating as we possibly can!
      This is ridiculous. When Taiwanese PC clone makers were manufacturing the models in the 1980s, I saw quite a few innovators come out to market their own Chinese enabled versions of the PC. These guys came from Hong Kong, Taiwan, Singapore. Unfortunately, standards were fragmented and there was no consensus on input methods. Then MS came in the late 1980s, and 1990s and swept these all away. This was followed by the internet. The point is that Chinese enabled PCs did start, and would have followed a natural course of evolution and competition, with or without American MNCs. It may be argued that their presence, and the internet accelerated the adoption of standards!
      If the Chinese want their own information infrastructure, they are free to create it for themselves - or they can choose to use ours, which we are making available freely.
      Yes, this will happen, as long as the Communist Government does nothing stupid like they did in the past like the Cultural Revolution.
      Why is America always the bad guy in cultural discussions?
      Becuase of holier than thou attitudes like that. Drop it, and accept the current Chinese diaspora. Live with the times. This is the only way forwards.
    22. Re:Same old language barrier? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It has nothing to do with English. Within China, there isn't a single common language. There is a language barrier within China itself.

    23. Re:Same old language barrier? by Mike+Schiraldi · · Score: 4, Funny

      English is the lingua franca of international commerce

      I agree with you, but i find it kinda funny that you use a Latin phrase meaning "French language" to illustrate your point that English is top dog.

    24. Re:Same old language barrier? by Sloppy · · Score: 2

      Do you really expect everyone else to learn english so you don't have to learn anything else?

      I expect (in the sense of "predict", not in the sense of "demand") them to learn English, because they want some of America's money.

      The customer is always right. Speak the customer's language.

      If China ever gives up communism and decides to become productive, then it will become useful for a lot of westerners to learn Chinese. Until then, the reasons just aren't very compelling.

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    25. Re:Same old language barrier? by 3seas · · Score: 2

      It's not a problem once computer science gets back to genuine computer science and establishes the Natural Laws of the Physical Phenomenon of Translation Mechanics/Machinery - (Abstraction manipulation mechanics).

      One you have the universal translator core, it become only a matter of doing the vocabulary, syntax and semantics programming to then be able to translate into whatever other language you want, including human to machine programming.

      Oops! And you thought the great wall of china was hard to get thru! Try the Wall of the psuedo programmer elites!

      maybe see other posts by our truely?

    26. Re:Same old language barrier? by sql*kitten · · Score: 2

      I agree with you, but i find it kinda funny that you use a Latin phrase meaning "French language" to illustrate your point that English is top dog.

      I was setting up the bit where I say that English makes a good international language because it freely adopts words from foreign languages :0)

    27. Re:Same old language barrier? by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 2

      As far as phonetic simplicity, consistency, and sensible orthography, Hawaiian and Japanese (kana) would be far better candidates than English, followed by Spanish.

    28. Re:Same old language barrier? by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      "Keep in mind that English is a very hard language to learn for fornigners for two reasons:

      English has nearly 200 phonetic sounds, which can not be learned unless one learns the sounds as a little kid.
      English has horrible spelling "

      And Chinese is better? Writen Chinese doesn't even use the "right" alphabet! I may not be able to spell worth a dam in English, but at least I understand the letters.

      "Finally, Esperanto is alive and well, thank you very much."

      I read somewhere that more people speak Klingon than Esperanto!

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    29. Re:Same old language barrier? by ncc74656 · · Score: 2
      Keep in mind that English is a very hard language to learn for fornigners for two reasons:
      • English has nearly 200 phonetic sounds, which can not be learned unless one learns the sounds as a little kid.
      • English has horrible spelling

      I won't debate that English can be tough to learn (I've heard it plenty of times before, and my own attempts at learning German and Spanish gave me the impression that it's fairly tough to pick up a foreign language and use it well), but 200 sounds? The speech-synthesizer chips from a couple of decades ago typically supported no more than 64 phonemes, which were supposed to be sufficient for generating any word in the English language.

      As for spelling...well, there are more rules and exceptions-to-the-rules than in most languages, but there is still a certain amount of logic to them. I don't have any problems with spelling, though I'll admit there are more than a few alleged English-speakers who have spelling issues...

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    30. Re:Same old language barrier? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lingua Franca means "free language" - not French.

    31. Re:Same old language barrier? by Mike+Schiraldi · · Score: 2

      Well, it turns out it's Italian, not Latin. Still, according to Mirriam-Webster, franca means Frankish (i.e. French), not free.

    32. Re:Same old language barrier? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Greek would also be a good example too. Greek has been a phonetic language for longer than most of the languaged you mentioned existed.

      If you know modern Greek orthography, you know the ancient Greek alphabet, orthography and phonetics. The only thing a modern Greek speaker needs to learn to speak ancient Greek is the vocabulary. Okay, learning the vocabulary takes a long time, but it is still better than having to learn all the other stuff over again.

    33. Re:Same old language barrier? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I was setting up the bit where I say that English makes a good international language because it freely adopts words from foreign languages"

      No that is one of the bad things about English. It wantonly borrows words. Alot of reason why the orthography of English is so inconsistent is because it borrows words without adapting them to English orthography. 'Bourgeoisie' is a good example, it follows French orthograhy and not English. An English speaker needs to memorize how to spell and pronounce that word.

      Also you are lucky you are a karma whore and your banal comments keep getting modded up.

    34. Re:Same old language barrier? by blisspix · · Score: 1

      English? more like American. I really hate how American spellings like color etc are seeping into foreign culture. Why, when I write HTML, should I have to use ugly US spelling instead of being able to use proper and correct English spelling. coloUr!

    35. Re:Same old language barrier? by Banjonardo · · Score: 1
      Besides, there are purely technical reasons why English is a "better" language than Chinese for computing - look at the numbers of characters in the alphabets, for example. English words are distinct, Chinese ideograms are much more dependent on context and the interpretation of the listener.

      So you're saying that English is good because it uses the alphabet??? Huh. Interesting. So.....naaaah, too easy.

      --

      -----

      Score 3? For what? Being wrong, at length? - smirkleton

    36. Re:Same old language barrier? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To save bandwidth. duh.

    37. Re:Same old language barrier? by Banjonardo · · Score: 1
      The English language is overrated.

      Firstly, it's decendent from Germanic, not a Romance Language. Therefore, it is relatively new, and quite brutish.

      Secondly, Kids have always told me (I'm 15 yrs. old, Brasilian) that English is the hardest language in the world to learn. Well, perhaps to A Chinese speaker. I already know the alphabet: Portuguese, you may know, does use the same one. (heh.) Also, Portuguese~Latin which helps immensely in english. For some reason, Latin rooted words seem more sophisticated: I don't "answer", I "respond."

      Anyhow, English does have some really dumb pronunciation problems: cloth and clothing, for one. Jeez! Is it "Cl-au-thing" or "Clothe"? How about cloth and clothes? Yuck.

      English is not so hard to learn. How do I know? Cause I did, as a ten years old, in about 6 months. (Of course, I read a lot. Which puts my English far, far beyond that of my peers.) My parents learned. My father speaks perfectly. (Or nearly so.) My mom is very fluent, with minor word changes.

      English does also have annoying tenses, like the Present Perfect: I Have Done, Have Sold, Have Bought, Have Flown, Have Swum. In Spanish, or Portuguese, there are what, 8 exceptions? Mostly cause the verbs can be categorized as -AR, -IR, -ER.

      Back to the point: English is quite overrated.

      --

      -----

      Score 3? For what? Being wrong, at length? - smirkleton

    38. Re:Same old language barrier? by Banjonardo · · Score: 1
      I wouldn't call that adopted.... more like sophisticated? In the 19th century and sometimes earlier, French was THE cultured language, in diplomacy, etc.

      I kind of like it when English speakers use Latin phrases. That's when my (native) Portuguese comes in.

      --

      -----

      Score 3? For what? Being wrong, at length? - smirkleton

    39. Re:Same old language barrier? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Cause I did, as a ten years old, in about 6 months."

      You mean:

      Because I did, as a ten year old, in about 6 months.

  15. Most of the content will be in Chinese... by Happy+go+Lucky · · Score: 1

    ..but most of the content already is, judging by how much spam I get and how much of it's Chinese.

  16. Engrish by Renraku · · Score: 1

    Not to sound biased here, but isn't the Internet mostly in English already? since English is one of the most widely used languages in the world, why don't they just either learn English or get some software to convert the English into Chinese? Language is only a barrier because we don't put forth effort to express ideas.

    --
    Job? I don't have time to get a job! Who will sit around and bitch about being broke and unemployed then?
    1. Re:Engrish by trash+eighty · · Score: 1

      actually there are millions of pages already in chinese but as you can't read it you probably haven't noticed ;)

      why should they have to learn english when there are 100s of companies and 1000s of individuals already providing content in chinese?

    2. Re:Engrish by autopr0n · · Score: 1

      Not to sound biased here, but isn't the Internet mostly in English already

      It may have been at some point but it certanly isn't any more. There's a lot out there in other languages, but you just don't see it taht much. Unless you go looking for Jpop or something :P

      --
      autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  17. Chineese... by hatchet · · Score: 1

    Did you know that writing of most eastern nations is more or less similar. For example.. janapnese guy can easily read chineese newspaper.. but cannot verbaly communicate with them.

    1. Re:Chineese... by JubeiX · · Score: 1

      Not true. Not true at all.

      While Japanese uses a lot of the same kanji as Chinese, they sometimes have different (even if only slightly) meanings associated with them.

      Also, consider that a literate (in the eyes of the goverment) japanese individual does not know as many kanji as a Chinese individual.

      Other languages don't use as heavily Chinese derived kanji either. See Korean.

      JubeiX

    2. Re:Chineese... by Xerion · · Score: 0

      You gotta be kidding me. How many Japanese you know who can understand more than 30% of a Chinese newspaper article?

      According to your logic, English speakers should have no trouble reading Spanish/French/German, since they use pretty much the same set of alphabet, and all rooted in Latin.

    3. Re:Chineese... by mizukami · · Score: 1

      You may be confusing Mandarin and Cantonese, which are both considered "Chinese". The two languages are verbally incompatible, but use (more or less) the same character set and written grammar, allowing both Mandarin and Cantonese speakers to read the same text.

      While Japanese kanji were taken from the Chinese language, there are many differences in how they are written and used to form words. A Japanese person reading a Chinese newspaper would be something similar to an English speaker reading a French newspaper. Here and there s/he would spot familiar words, and with luck may be able to pick out enough words to figure out the topic of a given article, but what is being said about that topic would be completely incomprehensible.

      --
      CC-licensed translations of Japanese fiction: http://tonygonz.blogspot.com/
  18. More cock-yanking from California... by Bowie+J.+Poag · · Score: 5, Insightful



    The idea that Chinese will be the predominant language on the web is absurd.

    China, despite recent moves towards a more open, capitalist society, has a problem that wont go away. Saw an interesting program on PBS a few months ago that discussed how China has changed in the past 50 years. Basically, you have a situation these days where the gap between the upper class and lower class is insanely wide. The wealthier segment of the population can often afford computers, internet access and the like, but this wealthier portion only makes up a tiny, tiny fraction of China's population. Meanwhile, the bulk of China's population are subsistance farmers who aren't allowed to even BE in (let alone conduct business in) China's main citiies. In most of these rural areas, electric power and indoor plumbing are considered high tech luxuries. Infact, China's national telecom infrastructure is considerably less extensive than most states in the U.S.

    China's on the move, yes, but they have a looooooooooooong long way to go before their influence on the Internet becomes anywhere near as large as Europe's or America's influence.

    Cheers,

    --
    Bowie J. Poag

    1. Re:More cock-yanking from California... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clearly the whining of someone that has no knowledge of Asia.

      India has a gap that matches your claims....not true about China.

      I write user guides with both traditional and simplified Chinese...never Hindi.

      China has a communnal society where needs are met, not ignored..there are lines at the internet cafe's (no cafes in India)...they have money and interest that are properly aligned with their expectations. Get a clue.

    2. Re:More cock-yanking from California... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Yeah I notice that kind of stuff too. It is like people only criticize governments/nations that their own government and media have choosen to demonize. The West likes to demonize Iraq for killing Kurds, but Turkey does so with imputiny, they are the little darling of the West.

      You always hear Americans mention China when they speak of repressive governments but rarely Saudi Arabi or Turkey(they have the second highest number of political prisoners after China which is an unfair comparison to China which has 19 times the population of Turkey, I am sure if they had a few million more people the Turkish government could be number one in this area).

      This selective observance of reality and selective criticism is disturbing. Do not just criticize nations that your media demonize's and ignore ones who may be your homeland ally, but do the same thing.

    3. Re:More cock-yanking from California... by Red+Eyes · · Score: 1
      Meanwhile, the bulk of China's population are subsistance farmers who aren't allowed to even BE in (let alone conduct business in) China's main citiies.

      Well, how would you like it if everyone in NY state packed up and moved into NY city because they thought they'd make more money? Governments do have to care about migration patterns because (1) it can affect vital food and water distribution (2) it can create vast unemployment problems caused by a glut of workers (3) sewage issues (4) crime rates (5) obscene rises in property prices (see Silicon Valley) and a host of other nation-crippling issues.

    4. Re:More cock-yanking from California... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who the fuck , do you think, created conditions where everyone and his brother wants to get into big cities ?
      Fucking government.

      Nation-crippling issues are most often result of the Government having too much influence.

    5. Re:More cock-yanking from California... by 3seas · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's not going to be about who has to learn what language in order to use the internet. But rather what language do you want to use to access the internet? Where the most used is determined by internet population of langauge use.

      Give yourself a universal translator and it don't matter what language you speak or use. But what language is used most would inherently be relative to what the native language is of most of the users.

      The article is suggesting, without saying it out right, that such a translator will exist in wide use by then.

      It's really not so difficult to believe. But what is more difficult to accept for many psuedo programmers is that the same technology can and will be used to translate human languages into programming language (auto-coding) and therefor allow anyone who learns basic programming concepts to program using their natural human language.

      mabe see other posts by yours truely?

    6. Re:More cock-yanking from California... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Economics take care of this. As the city fills up, rents increase until the number of people who can afford to move in goes down; eventually you come to a state of equilibrium.

      Of course, there will always be people who come but can't stay, and anyone who tries to sleep on the street will generally get kicked out, either in China or in America, and I don't know of too many people (aside from many of the residents of San Francisco) who have too many problems with the city government keeping the streets clean of the homeless.

      There really is only one effective policy, and that is to let people live where they can afford to; everything else will take care of itself.

      If China's government made it more attractive for people to stay in the countryside, say by promoting economic policies which benefit the small farmer or factory worker, then of course there will be reason for people to stay out of the cities. I'm pretty sure this is what China is trying to do already, these things just take time.

      Unfortunately, the restrictions that China puts on the ability for people to freely move about the country, and into and out of various cities, creates friction in the free market process and a drag on economic development. But don't worry. I lived there for most of this year and it seemed pretty clear to me that they were coming around to see the light on issues like these pretty quickly.

    7. Re:More cock-yanking from California... by shokk · · Score: 2

      The wealthier segment of the population can often afford computers, internet access and the like, but this wealthier portion only makes up a tiny, tiny fraction of China's population.


      Quick, what's just 1% of a billion...10 million. How many Internet users in the US alone? 100million? How many Internet users outside the U.S.? Another 100 million? How many retailers are smart enough to attract those 10 million customers by styling their pages in Mandarin?


      All the telecomm/hi-tech companies making moves into China know that even that 1% with disposable income are enough motivation. With China's recent admission into the WTO they now have to play by new rules that will plunk embargoes no them at the drop of a hat if they even think they're making too many rugs or charging too much for crops, all while opening those markets more. While in India, also having a very wide disparity between the classes, I saw ads for all sorts of cell phones and other items that were obviously beyond all but the wealthiest Indians, since it is estimated half of New Delhi lives in illegal shanty type housing or which I saw covering large expanses of land. The companies that are charging in there with these goods know that just 1% of that market is worth going for. And with such large population numbers, an extra percent of the market is more than just gravy. It's another 10 million customers.

      --
      "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master."
  19. Great Reason to Learn Esperanto by DCowern · · Score: 1

    This is a wonderful reason for us all to learn Esperanto. This site offers a free Esperanto course with a personal tutor.

    1. Re:Great Reason to Learn Esperanto by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Esperanto is a eurocentric toy-like language. If we, the human race, finally decide to get our shit together and develop a common second language to use internationally, why not develop a language that is modern and uses "state of the art" principles in linguistics. I guess the closest thing to that would be lojban.
      http://www.lojban.org

      I really wish we could decide up on a common second language... I don't care what it is, I'd take the time to learn it and use it, even if it is a sloppy "natural" language.

      Natural languages are more like the spaghetti-code mess in early BASIC, we could design something more clean, sleek, and powerful like the modern object oriented languages are.

      Too bad we humans are lazy and resort to comparing penis sizes... linguistically speaking.

    2. Re:Great Reason to Learn Esperanto by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm proud that my language has a small alphabet.

    3. Re:Great Reason to Learn Esperanto by Scurrilous+Knave · · Score: 1

      Absolutely. However, there's a lot of visceral inertia (I can say that in public, can't I?) to overcome before most people will consider learning any other language. It's tied up pretty deeply in their personal and cultural identity. Witness the vitriolic attack by the (clearly under-informed) AC who replied to you first.


      Personally, I think it's just fear. Fear by people who are used to being very competent at what they do, of being put in a situation where they aren't the Alpha for a while. I lucked out, picked up Esperanto in high school because I found it very geeky and I was a stone geek. All the other kids laughed, which was nothing new. I'm very glad I spent the amazingly short time to learn the basics; now I'm reading translated literature (some of it from Chinese!) at a fairly advanced level, with ease.


      As for the attacker, sigh ... I don't have the energy to form a proper rebuttal. I guess I'd note that Esperanto is the single biggest success story in the constructed-language world, the longest-lived, and its speakers have increased in numbers pretty steadily since the beginning. But don't take my word for it (and if geeks are reading this, they won't), see for yourself. Those links were good; here are some others:



      Iru. Jenu. Lernu. Ghuu.

    4. Re:Great Reason to Learn Esperanto by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No Reason
      sed estas kialo por lerni esperanton.

    5. Re:Great Reason to Learn Esperanto by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Esperanto is the only widely-spoken planned language all over the world, w/ 2 millions speakers.

      Find me ONE FLUENT speaker of Lojban or Loglan, and I owe you a drink.
      (most papers about loglan/lojban are in English only, and contain sentences like "...and the two volunteers succeeded in speaking lojban for 15 minutes...")

      By the way, I really wonder how much Esperanto you speak to be so sharp in your judgement.

      ?is rebabilo,
      -Federico

    6. Re:Great Reason to Learn Esperanto by orzetto · · Score: 1

      Ghuu???

      ?uu estas pli bela.
      ?u Slashdot ne subtenas unikodajn ?apeletojn?

      (for non-Esperanto speakers - just a joke about when to start using Unicode...)

      --
      Victims of 9/11: <3000. Traffic in the US: >30,000/y
    7. Re:Great Reason to Learn Esperanto by orzetto · · Score: 1

      ...Kompreneble kaj bedauxrinde ne.

      Hey you webmasters!!! What about supporting Unicode here in Slashdot postings? BTW one could even post in Chinese then... :-)

      --
      Victims of 9/11: <3000. Traffic in the US: >30,000/y
    8. Re:Great Reason to Learn Esperanto by PurpleBob · · Score: 2

      Esperanto's vocabulary was founded on the assumption that European languages were the only ones that mattered. The fact that the vocabulary is familiar to Europeans is the main thing which sets Esperanto apart from other constructed languages. Do you think that Esperanto would appeal much to Chinese speakers?

      --
      Win dain a lotica, en vai tu ri silota
    9. Re:Great Reason to Learn Esperanto by Scurrilous+Knave · · Score: 1

      Do you think that Esperanto would appeal much to Chinese speakers?


      It sure would. China today is one of the most active locations for Esperanto. The magazine El Popola Chinio (From People's China) is one of the largest and most professionally-produced anywhere. The largest and most modern Esperanto dictionary is Zhang's recent Chinese-Esperanto dictionary. Chinese Esperantists probably outnumber their counterparts in the USA by a wide margin, though I have no data on this. By all accounts, the Chinese like Esperanto just fine!

  20. yeah, but... by abes · · Score: 1

    is that Manderin or Cantonese? As far as I understand there are even more distinctions that one can make between all the variants.

    There might end up being more pages in Chinese in quantity, but that isn't the same as visibility. Any page that wants to speak to a world wide audience will have to have an english version.

    Aside from being a lazy american who could barely manage russian, and is quite content with only speaking english, there is a much more persuasive argument. Programming languages. Not that everyone technically needs to know how to program, but getting a computer to do anything sophisticated requires at least a pseudo-language. Take HTML for instance. While you can fill the content with any language you like, the tags will forever remain in english (there can also be hacks made of course) [counter examples to my english hypothesis are assembly language and Perl]

    Besides, everyone knows that either esperanto or pig-latin will the real official language spoken by the world come 20 years.

  21. It doesn't matter.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...how far east the internet gets, they'll always be Goatse.cx

  22. Technology to the rescue by inkswamp · · Score: 3, Interesting
    And how is the Internet supposed to draw people together when the same old language barrier still exists?

    Give it time. On a Pink Floyd mailing list I subscribe to, one of the more prominent posters is an intriguing fellow from Japan who doesn't speak English and has published a book in Japan about the band. He posts through a piece of software that provides translations both ways. The software is primitive and far from perfect. Frankly, it can sometimes turn out some pretty puzzling results (I often wonder how my messages to him come out.) Despite that, I--and many others on the list--have gotten to know him and value his contribution. I can see the development of this kind of software becoming more and more worthwhile as the Internet moves east. I look forward to it actually.

    --Rick

    --
    --Rick "If it isn't broken, take it apart and find out why."
    1. Re:Technology to the rescue by swb · · Score: 1

      Frankly, it can sometimes turn out some pretty puzzling results

      And the PF commentary from native speakers isn't sometimes puzzling?

    2. Re:Technology to the rescue by 3seas · · Score: 2

      Technology exist already that is better than what you are using for translation.

      To identify the gears and bearings of translation (the naural laws of the physical phenomenon of Abstraction manipulation) in such a manner that can be created in computer functionality and accessible by all, it then become possible to apply the OSS/GPL model of the Bazzar (sp?) to create the various language translation vocabulary, syntax, semantics sets, including slang and even programming languages (any language).

      In the open model you can improve translations as you come across a place where you see a need and have the knowledge to do. Perhaps as little as a word or phrase at a time. But in time..... well....the open community force would certainly be bigger than the developer community of Linux!

      Maybe see other posts from your truely?

    3. Re:Technology to the rescue by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 2
      ... one of the more prominent posters is from Japan. He posts through a piece of software that provides translations both ways.

      Punk Froyd is gleat. Dalk Sido of the Moon locks, dude! Too bad Logel Watels reft the band. They was ichiban.

      --
      That is all.
  23. The Internet can't do chinese ?? by J.D.+Hogg · · Score: 1
    "[The Internet] can cope with most European languages, but its core technologies, from the domain name system to HTML itself, don't translate naturally into as foreign a dialect as Mandarin."

    The Internet is perfectly capable of doing Mandarin. For example, check this out, I'm going to write "slashdot" in Mandarin without using unicode :

    -+- This is
    /|\ "slash"

    ,|/ This is
    / \ "dot"

    See ? it's called ASCII. It does a faily good approximation of Mandarin I say ...

    1. Re:The Internet can't do chinese ?? by MisterBlister · · Score: 1

      The cool thing about ASCII is it can be used to represent not just English and Mandarin, but an infinite amount of languages, using clever symbols.
      For example, in my native language this is how we write 'Slashdot':

      <O
      &nbsp(\
      X
      8===D

    2. Re:The Internet can't do chinese ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not slashdot, that's a bird sitting on someone's penis.

  24. Surely the Internet has NO agenda! by squaretorus · · Score: 2

    China is growing in wealth - and is set to accellerate - remember Japan? Look at China! It's going to happen - why do you think Clinton was so keen to make friends and open trade routes.

    China will be the biggest exporting economy on the planet within 10-15 years. You think they wont need PCs??

    Also - China is changing. The very heart of Capitalism - the right to found and operate a business - has been granted to every adult citizen in the Chinese constitution! You can't get a better indicator of China 'going western' than that.

    Rich countries have better human rights records because the people poke sticks at the government less, so get poked back less. China gets rich, China gets Internet, China gets better human rights.

    China will not change fundamentally because of the internet, but because of the free market. You cannot benefit from a global free market if you are not a national free market. China is moving towards a free market - so it can make money out of the rest of us.

    The 'west' has been doing it for centuries - it works - we all have laptops and comfortable pants - good luck to them.

    1. Re:Surely the Internet has NO agenda! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The 'west' has been doing it for centuries - it works - we all have laptops and comfortable pants - good luck to them."

      This is sick. Are you kidding me? Every nation can not be as rich as the West. If they all are who is gonna manufacture all the electronics cheaply for the West? It will not be possible to manufacture it as cheaply as it is now if all nations have a more equal standard of living in respect to each other. The days of over consumption and over production would be over in a more egalatarian world.

    2. Re:Surely the Internet has NO agenda! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rich countries have better human rights records because the people poke sticks at the government less, so get poked back less. China gets rich, China gets Internet, China gets better human rights.


      You clearly don't understand how the west got to where it is with human rights. It was a centuries-long struggle (still going on to some degree) against powerfull vested interests. Poking sticks (and getting killed as a result) was CRITICALLY IMPORTANT to the process. Anyone who tells you otherwise is either lying or ignorant.

    3. Re:Surely the Internet has NO agenda! by scrytch · · Score: 2

      > The very heart of Capitalism - the right to found and operate a business

      That's a nice try, but it's hardly the heart. In fact, it sounds like a smokescreen. The heart of capitalism is to be able to own a business, to keep as much money as it makes as you want (yes, taxes are in a sense a check and balance against pure capitalism). In other words, free rein over one's investment and return of capital. Maybe China is indeed moving toward that. Just that in the information age, it seems a bit odd to consider a tightly throttled media a "free market" in any sense.

      --
      I've finally had it: until slashdot gets article moderation, I am not coming back.
    4. Re:Surely the Internet has NO agenda! by squaretorus · · Score: 2

      Rich guys have better sticks to poke with - look at OBL

      I was talking about the departure and destination - the route to social change is normally messy, scary, and deadly. Just accept it and get on with it.

  25. Chinese as a second language? by Malc · · Score: 3, Interesting

    There might be more people who can read Chinese as their first language than there are Anglophones... but what about the people who speak English or Chinese as their second language? I would say in that light that the internet would have more Anglophones using it.

    Can somebody clarify this for me: isn't English one of the main second languages in India. And isn't the population of India supposed to surpass that of China within the next 10 or 20 years?

    1. Re:Chinese as a second language? by linca · · Score: 1

      The main difference between Chinese and English is that where Chinese is a National Language, used only in one country, English is an international Language, spoken natively on every continent, and the foremost second language. That is why, even if many people on the 'net speak chinese, English will remain prominent for most 'international' sites.

    2. Re:Chinese as a second language? by trash+eighty · · Score: 1

      chinese is also used in taiwan, singapore, malaysia, indonesia and so on by sizeable populations

    3. Re:Chinese as a second language? by linca · · Score: 1

      By sizeable CHINESE population. Whereas English is used by africans, Indians,... Chinese is exported only with its own people ; the chinese language isn't spoken by non-ethnically chinese people, only by emigrants from china.

    4. Re:Chinese as a second language? by trash+eighty · · Score: 1

      so what? it still means there are many people who want to use the internet in chinese - which is the point here surely?

    5. Re:Chinese as a second language? by linca · · Score: 1

      The point is that, since English is widespread among many different ethnics, English will be much more used as an intercultural language ; i.e. When a Dane wants to communicate with a Japanese, they will use English instead of Chinese. Only chinese people speak Chinese, whereas there are many non-native, second language English speakers.

    6. Re:Chinese as a second language? by mizhi · · Score: 2

      A majority of people who speak Chinese might be Chinese, but there are some of us who are NOT Chinese who do speak it. Other than that, your basic premise is correct.

      --
      Humorless sig goes here.
    7. Re:Chinese as a second language? by autopr0n · · Score: 1

      the chinese language isn't spoken by non-ethnically chinese people, only by emigrants from china.

      Ni shuo shen.ma?

      --
      autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    8. Re:Chinese as a second language? by jaoswald · · Score: 2

      And in all of those countries, English is the primary second language. Widespread English competence is a huge marketing point for Singapore in attracting international business.

    9. Re:Chinese as a second language? by trash+eighty · · Score: 1

      you're correct but we're argueing different points ;)

    10. Re:Chinese as a second language? by 3seas · · Score: 2

      Language is not an issue, translation is.

      perhaps see other posts by yours truely?

  26. Chinese Keyboards by ender81b · · Score: 1

    In shear mathematical terms they are right -- if they could get by all the problems discussed above. And of course I do believe that they are *still* having problems with developing a chinese keyboard (1 million different symbols). That seems to me to be more of a barrier than anything else (unless you propose to teach the entire population pinyin(?) I believe it is called - chinese language spelled out phonetically in roman characters (think Beijing,Hong Kong,Mao Zedong, etc).

    1. Re:Chinese Keyboards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In my opinion it would be nice if cultures would just admit that another culture does something better than them and adopts it. The Greeks were smart enough to know the Phonecians had a good idea with their alphabet and they were not too arrogant as to not adopt it. The Chinese should just make learning writing their language easier even if it means admitting that the West has a better idea with this alphabet stuff.

    2. Re:Chinese Keyboards by autopr0n · · Score: 2

      unless you propose to teach the entire population pinyin(?) I believe it is called - Chinese language spelled out phonetically in roman characters (think Beijing,Hong Kong,Mao Zedong, etc

      Every literate person in mainland china knows pin-yin It's a part of the standard curiculm. This isn't the case in Taiwan though, where people use bopomofo keyboards (I think) as well as pinyin stuff bopomofo is a system for encoding Chinese based on the sound, like katakana and hiragana in Japan.

      --
      autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    3. Re:Chinese Keyboards by AtomicBomb · · Score: 1

      In Taiwan and HongKong, many people use an input method known as Cangjie (esp for those who touch PC since early 90's). Basically, you map the shape of a character into a 5 letter alphabatical string. It is a real pain in the rear.

      For professional typists and those who do not know pin-yin, tough luck, they will have to live with Cangjie. Only adv is Cangjie can usu achieve better input speed for trained typists...

    4. Re:Chinese Keyboards by trash+eighty · · Score: 1

      but alphabetical representation is *not* better for chinese. you see, mandarin has 1000s of homophores which can make reading pinyin a bit difficult, for example there are several "qing"s, and dozens of "shi"s! often we can use marks or numbers to denote tones (e.g. qing3, shi2) but its still not as easy than characters, which are unique to each "word".

    5. Re:Chinese Keyboards by UberChuckie · · Score: 0

      There are tablets like this one where you draw the character and an appropriate double-byte character appears at the cursor.

  27. I doubt it by Ubi_NL · · Score: 1

    At the moment most software is still english. Not M$ word but things like BIND and SendMail. These rely simply on english characters. So even though you have chinese HTML, you still have to type in your addresses in English.
    Besides, I've tried typing on a chinese keyboard and it sure wasn't easy.

    --

    If an experiment works, something has gone wrong.
    1. Re:I doubt it by mizhi · · Score: 1

      Mao tried to get Chinese people to drop their Character system for a romanized alphabet. He failed miserably and the result is the simplified character set used in the PRC. I doubt the West will have much more luck getting the language to evaporate.

      --
      Humorless sig goes here.
    2. Re:I doubt it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, throwing up after eating dunkin donuts is real snooty...

    3. Re:I doubt it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it's not easy to type on one. But that's what handwriting recognition is for, and it works very well for languages with consistent stroke ordering.

  28. Language doesn't matter by Genshadow · · Score: 1

    In 10 years language translation programs will be to the point where they can be used in a production level environment. With this in mind I beleive that a standard language on the internet, or even communications in general, will not be nessary. Although this is just my opinion and I do not have any facts to back up this claim.

    P.S. I apploigize if this post is redundant, my route to /. went down.

    --
    Sanity is the playground of the unimaginative
  29. The shift has started.... by Tazzy531 · · Score: 1

    The shift had started a few years ago...The next big internet boom is currently taking place in the far east. Pretty much a lot of the entrepeneurs that had worked on internet startups here in the US shifted their focus over to the far east. By learning from the mistakes that they made, they are able to do it more efficiently.

    --


    _______________________________
    "I'm not Conceited...I'm just a realist..."
  30. aol user? by BigBir3d · · Score: 1

    would you consider the average AOL user "on the internet?"

    me neither...

  31. The Internet Shifts East by jawahar · · Score: 1

    This would NOT happen. Chinese is not diversified, as is English. Please check google zeitgeist. http://www.google.com/press/zeitgeist.html

  32. Re:yeah, but...Written Chinese by linca · · Score: 1

    The spoken Mandarin and Cantonese are diferrent, but the written Languages are exactly the same. And the Internet is mostly a written medium.

    How many actual English words do you need to know to actually program in any languages? 20, 30 at most? Very easy to learn, much easier to learn than English, as a whole language. Indeed the vocabulary isn't the hardest stage of learning a language ; the really tough part is the grammar, and the idiomatic expression. Saying that a prgramming language is in English is meaningless.

  33. learn mandarin / kanji by andi75 · · Score: 1
    Language barrier? Learn mandarin (the standard chinese, already a second language to many many chinese. There's dozens of dialoects/languages spoken in China (cantonese, hakka, wu, min etc.).

    And since kanji is a language independent alphabet, you can communicate with people that don't even speak the same language as you.

    - Andreas

    1. Re:learn mandarin / kanji by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Kanji is actually a Japanese dependent interpretation of Chinese Han logograms. Kanji readers can't readily interpret Han writing. Apparently there are linguiistic differences between Japan and China.

      Who knew?

    2. Re:learn mandarin / kanji by jx100 · · Score: 1
      kanji is a language independent alphabet
      Well, since the English alphabet is very close to many other Latin-based ones, by your logic I should be able to speak with anyone who knows Spanish or German.
  34. English by quantaman · · Score: 1

    Contrary to the perception in North America english is actually used very little over the world. It is only 10th most popular over the world and even on the internet it comprises of only about 43% of the material. It is inevitable that english will become even more marginalized over the world and if North American buisnesses are going to prosper they are going to have to learn to serve these new market.

    --
    I stole this Sig
    1. Re:English by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I bet you are from one of those marginalized countries forced to speak or read English.

      Don't worry if your theory is true America will dry up and blow away. Just make sure you pray at your bedside every night. Cause it ain't gonna happen.

      Chinese learn English to sell things to America. We don't learn Chinese to buy things from them.

    2. Re:English by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chinese learn English to sell things to America. We don't learn Chinese to buy things from them

      And they are ripping you because of it, suckers.

    3. Re:English by Skater · · Score: 1

      So, are there any other languages that go over the 43%?

      My guess is that English makes up 43% of the material, but the other 57% is a mix of all of the rest of the languages, so that English is still way ahead.

      Do you have any links for that statistic? I'm curious to see how much other languages really are used.

      Thanks.
      --RJ

  35. Re:Snot it! Snot it! Snot it hard! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hahah thats funny.

  36. Re:Bill Gates, dead at age 42 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yeah, too bad any linux office programs are useless.

    please read THIS from wired.com about your linux OS, then face the hard truth

  37. Check Out This Map... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I did a search on Google's Image search for "Chinese Internet Usage" and this is what I got, its a global map showing how much of the Internet is in Chinese.. Quite interesting.

    china-internet.gif

  38. Why are american standards always ignored? by evilviper · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I'll admit this is slightly off-topic, but this story reminded me of all the times that a US standard is ignored overseas. I wonder if anyone can even begin to explain it away.

    There's a million instances where a company or government essentially defines a standard before any other countries have even ventured into the territory. Simple enough. It seems that when other countries, usually European countries, get involved with that same technology, they adopt a standard incompatible with the US defined one.

    The first to come to mind is voltage, AC frequency, and the type of connctor used. That's only one thing however. Everything is incompatible for some reason. Even standards organizations... IEEE802 projects rarely exactly match the currently implimented products. Token Ring, Ethernet, etc.

    In networking a T-1 != E-1, and a T-3 != E-3.

    This could go on forever...

    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    1. Re:Why are american standards always ignored? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It goes the other way too, look at GSM versus CDMA, DVB (and COFDM) versus HDTV (and 8-VSB), DAB versus US digital radio(whatever that standard is)...

      If anything, the US is more guilty of this then the Europeans.

  39. Fairly meaningless by MisterBlister · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Sure, Chinese may very well be the native language of most Internet users in 10 years, due to the giant size of the Chinese population, but any claims that this will cause some great shift in how the world uses the web is pretty silly.

    Numbers alone aren't significant, if they were Chinese (which, as the article points out, has so many speakers) would be the quasi-official language of multinational business, travel, etc..Right? But it isn't...English is. My point isn't to praise English (which in many ways is a very stupid language, technically), but just point out that the numbers only tell a very small part of the story. I won't even bother to point out that many of these Chinese speakers who get on the net will be in no position to contribute much to the global economy in terms of buying goods for import, etc, due to political and economical roadblocks.

    1. Re:Fairly meaningless by Kirruth · · Score: 1

      I don't think that a good measure of Internet participation is how much you spend buying stuff on it: it's really about the exchange of ideas.

      The truth is that people in China cannot yet exchange ideas freely, both because of linguistic barriers and because of social and political controls. So, while they may be on the Internet, their impact on the thought of the wider world must necessarily be limited.

      --
      "Well, put a stake in my heart and drag me into sunlight."
    2. Re:Fairly meaningless by cockeater · · Score: 0

      I think the point was that Chinese won't be taking over as the international business language.

    3. Re:Fairly meaningless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lots of conservative right wing people like to think of things in dehumanizing economic terms. You brought up a good point, but the guy you are replying to takes a less social approach and think in terms of monetary numbers.

    4. Re:Fairly meaningless by 3seas · · Score: 2

      ".....but any claims that this will cause some great shift in how the world uses the web is pretty silly. "

      On the surface you are probably right, but the underside will change greatly. Under what you see in what you access, will be a translator that will not only enable a greater level of communication but this will also break thru many barriers including the programming barrier often called the "software crisis".

      Translation is a very imporant issue in all of this. The best and fastest way to enable it is thru the methodology used of OSS/GPL sort of Open teamwork by whoever and whenever and how much they want to help.

      Langage is a "commons", as Lawrence Lessig often makee use of it. The whole Point of Language is to enable communications, and it's value only goes as far as it's agreed upon use is adherd to. This naturally make it's most useful in a "commons" state. Perhaps this is a factor that Lawrence has yet to integrate into his thinking regarding his perceptions of the future of ideas?
      (as even programming languages are "language")

      Anyways, the issue of translation and fortunately the mechanics of it, is of such nature that it cannot be patented or otherwise Intellectual Property constrained from use.

      Thru such a Universal Translator, the "official Human spoken language" wouldn't change much from how that is applied today. But to determine what the most used language s on teh internet would then be a matter of population choice. And I suspect in having a universal translator you and I will use our native language most often.

      mabe se other posts by yours truely?

    5. Re:Fairly meaningless by scrytch · · Score: 2

      Mention "translation" and "genuine computer science" in one more post again and you'll have a lock on the Slashdot Kook Of The Month nomination. Sincerely, if you only explain ideas in rants, that's all it is.

      --
      I've finally had it: until slashdot gets article moderation, I am not coming back.
  40. Re:yeah, but...Written Chinese by klui · · Score: 1

    There are Cantonese-specific characters that are sometimes used in films. An example of which is Jet Li's Fong Sai Yuk I and II. While most of the written language in Southern China is formal--which is pretty much the same as Mandarin--there are differences.

  41. lol... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the truth is revealed... wired.com even printed an article about this... *sigh* someday you all will see the truth.

  42. man.. check it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft and Apple ads are everywhere, but no one is funding major marketing campaigns for desktop Linux. No one with any clout is carrying the torch for desktop Linux. Who is Linux's Bill Gates or Steve Jobs? Not Linus Torvalds. He supports desktop Linux, but does little proselytizing.

    care of: this link here from wired.com

  43. wow, good story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The problem has caused even Rob Malda, the founder of Slashdot, to sound the alarm. Malda, known by his nom de net, CmdrTaco, can get down and dirty himself. So when CmdrTaco's own troops provoke his disgust, you know there's a serious problem.

    i like that part the best haha.
    hidden lil tid bit on page 3 :)
    HERE

  44. /\ Do not click Goatsex link /\ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Mod parent down.

  45. Re:yeah, but...Written Chinese by futakoma · · Score: 1
    The spoken Mandarin and Cantonese are diferrent, but the written Languages are exactly the same.

    Not true. There are Traditional and Simplified writing styles.

  46. You forget one thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    China is a communistic state. The base of comunism is that most things should be financed collectively through taxes. USA OTOH is capitalistic and everyone has to pay everything from their own pocket. In a communistic state there *should be* no extra charge for educaton, hospitals etc. But I'm no expert on China so I don't know if this works in practise.

    1. Re:You forget one thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      No.

      PinYin is PinGay!

  47. stats page by CordMeyer · · Score: 1

    Have a lookse here for current Global Internet Statistics by Language.

  48. Right on target by IpalindromeI · · Score: 1

    I completely agree. While the Chinese have the obvious population advantage that appears to come to this result, they don't have anywhere near as many internet users, let alone posters. Most of China is impoverished. They're trying to get their next meal, not sitting around reading slashdot. Not only that, but how much of the population can even read? This would probably be a necessity for using the internet and posting content to it (although it seems some people here get by). I would think Hindi would have a better chance of becoming the next internet language. Really what you have to look at is not which languages have the most speakers, but which languages have the most speakers in technologically developed countries. These are the places that are actively using and creating new internet content, en masse. I highly doubt China will be making a strong showing in that category very soon.

    --

    --
    Promoting critical thinking since 1994.
    1. Re:Right on target by JJ · · Score: 2

      I agree with this thread's main arguement, that Chinese will not be the language of the internet because of economics. I disagree with your guess that Hindi may have a better chance. True, India is actually creating a middle class and has a much better chance of having a real internet voice. However, since English is the other official language of India and so much of the web is currently in English, I doubt that many Indians will change it over to Hindi.

      --
      So long and thanks for all the fish . . . !!!
    2. Re:Right on target by jaoswald · · Score: 2

      But I would bet that most people who would use Hindi on the web are comfortable with English. In a country with hundreds of miscellaneous languages, with a common second language that happens to be the default world language, I don't think there is much incentive to use Hindi. Except to make a political point.

  49. Old news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    As most professional x-pats in the IT sector have known for the last year or so, Chinese will replace English on the net in less than 10 years. More like 5.

    If you start your studies now, you might be ready.

    As for me, I'm adding Chinese languages skills to Japanese and Korean.

    1. Re:Old news... by cockeater · · Score: 0

      Chinese will replace English on the net in less than 10 years. More like 5.

      How exactly is it going to "replace" English? Sure there might be a lot more Chinese information in five to ten years, but it doesn't mean it will come at the expense of that available in English. And unless you're activley *looking* for it, the internet to you will probably not be all that different.

  50. Half-on the internet by HalfFlat · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Would you even consider the average wealthy Chinese citizen with online access truly 'on the Internet'?
    Would you consider the average Western individual with dial-up access 'on the Internet'?

    There really are two classes of Internet citizens: those who have a fixed IP and can be information sources; and those who have dynamic IPs or are forbidden to run servers, and are pretty much restricted to being information sinks. Sure it's an oversimplification, but the vast majority of people on the Internet through home-connections, are second-class Internet citizens.

    In Australia for example, it is significantly more expensive to be fully on the net - we're looking at 15 to 23 cents per received megabyte of data, and they're marketting megabytes (10e6 bytes). If one is happy with a proxied web service and a server-free presence, then for $80 a month one can download 3 gigabytes or more over ADSL.

    1. Re:Half-on the internet by sql*kitten · · Score: 2

      There really are two classes of Internet citizens: those who have a fixed IP and can be information sources; and those who have dynamic IPs or are forbidden to run servers, and are pretty much restricted to being information sinks. Sure it's an oversimplification, but the vast majority of people on the Internet through home-connections, are second-class Internet citizens.

      That's a vast oversimplification, tho'. What about all the dialup users who simply use their ISP's static IP addresses to host web sites? Most dialup providers give a few MB of web site space for free.

      The fact that they are second class citizens is not a problem of the technology; rather it is a matter of the individuals involved choosing to participate or not.

  51. china? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wow. I wasn't even aware that they had electricity over there yet.

  52. The Internet isn't free. by Goragoth · · Score: 1

    On the other hand, the implementation of the Internet in places without certain civil liberties provides an interesting challenge to typical Western (idealist) notions about what the Internet does for society. We may have idealistic notions about the Internet and all the freedom it gives us but truth is that the Internet makes it easier to take away civil liberties than ever before (Carnivore anyone?). Let's all move to Freenet and then the Chinese will have the same liberties as everyone else 'cause you can't monitor/censor it.

  53. simple solution by autopr0n · · Score: 2

    jin tian xue xi han yu!

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    1. Re:simple solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've never heard anyone say han yu, there are alot of ways to say it though, 'zhong wen' seemingly the most common.

    2. Re:simple solution by haruharaharu · · Score: 2

      Um, first kill all the lawyers?

      --
      Reboot macht Frei.
    3. Re:simple solution by Bryan+Ischo · · Score: 2

      Heh - that was funny. Actually it says
      "Study Chinese Today!"

  54. Re:Chinese Keyboards (how?) by night37 · · Score: 1

    How does that work? I've always wondered that. With that many different symbols in their alphabet, how do they type things out?

  55. There, kinda by autopr0n · · Score: 2

    I actualy had an ICQ conversation in spanish with someone, using babelfish. I took spanish in highschool so I could sort of recognize the structure of what I was sending out. It didn't work very well, but we were able to talk.

    IBM's 'alphaworks' site had a english->chinese translation system (a long with other languages) online that actualy worked pretty well (or at least seemed to) Actualy working out the grammar as well as the words so you wouldn't end up with incoherent jiberish

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  56. Warning: goatse.cx link! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Here's the full link...

    http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=china-inter net/images/usage.gif%20%20%20% [snip lot's of %20's] %20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20&imgrefurl=htt p://www.goatse.cx

    Spaces mean you don't see the goatse.cx part of the URL in the status bar... How witty.

  57. India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    80% of the population in India is below the poverty line. That's hundreds of millions of individuals that will never...ever be a factor involving the internet, or any other technology now known or imagined. Comparing India's adoption of any technology to China is inappropriate.

    This type of assumption is indicative of how many people in the world are simply pre-occupied with their own culture. Visit India and China and then take another look at your own country. China has thousands of years of history, and has survived because they know how and why....they were here before Western civilation, and they will be here long after it has passed into history. Ignore it if you wish...it makes no difference to them.

    1. Re:India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      bitter little twat, aren't you?

    2. Re:India by Alsee · · Score: 2

      China has thousands of years of history, and has survived because they know how and why....they were here before Western civilation, and they will be here long after it has passed into history. Ignore it if you wish...it makes no difference to them.

      If China sticks with it's thousands of years of history it may inherit the Earth some day. Or it can join Western civilization and head for the stars.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    3. Re:India by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      "Don't forget India"

      Most US news media do, though, despite the fact that it will soon have more people than China and has a stable, democratic government and a stable, thriving economy.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    4. Re:India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately, the Chinese educational system does not do a very good job of teaching English. Having taught English to aspiring college students, current college students, and former college students in Beijing this summer, I can say that the average English competency for Chinese citizens is very low.

      Most Chinese place the blame on the educational system there, which places strong emphasis on rote memorization of vocabulary and reading skills, but very little on spoken conversational English. Actually many Chinese know quite a bit of vocabulary, and often are better schooled in English grammar than U.S. students, but somehow they never learn to put it all together into the ability to actually speak the language. It would be hard for their educational system to overcome this though as there are so very few native English speakers there teaching; most English is taught by people who don't know English very well themselves. The Chinese government unfortunately doesn't really do much to encourage English speakers to come to China to teach, so perhaps the blame lies ultimately with their visa policies.

      Not to mention that English is so very different from Chinese that it's hard for Chinese to learn English even when the curriculum is thorough and taught well.

      Furthermore, 99% of the population over the age of 30 there knows no English at all aside from "Hello!" (which you will hear enthusiastically shouted at you often if you ever visit China, but any reply in English will meet with a blank stare).

  58. Ching chang chong Chinaman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I am Ching Chang Chong.

    I eat rice.

    I am an ant. I am a termite. I m a yellow insect.

    Mass produced people. Like cheap chinaman trinkets.

    Life is Chinaman cheap says Ching Chang Chong.

    I am a yellow insect. A cockroach.

  59. Re:Chinese Keyboards (how?) by ender81b · · Score: 1

    I do believe (If I am wrong or if somebody knows the language better than I please correct me) that a number of basic symbols are common to the language. For instance 50% of characters contain a /, 30% containt a -, 20% containt a *, etc.

    Well a chinese keyboard is made up of as many of these common components as possible (three per key I believe) allowing you to construct something like 70% of the language using 100 some common symbols. Unfortunately it's the other 30% that kills you.

  60. A little history lesson by autopr0n · · Score: 4, Informative

    Actually, after Mao died the Deng Xiaoping and his cohorts were pretty freaked out by what happened and they began to liberalize (in the British sense of the word... like free markets and the like) both economically (Deng actually had a slogan "It's not bad to get rich") and politically. But the Tiananmen Square massacre scared them shitless, especially when people other then students began to get involved. It was suppressed. And given the background (having experienced china in the 1940s and through Mao's crap... Deng had to endure a couple of struggle sessions himself) It's easy to see why they might have been afraid.

    The problem is that when China looked around them to see what was successful they saw the Authoritarian capitalist states like Singapore, Korea and Taiwan. And they figured that it worked well. Taiwan has become a real democracy now though.

    I think after the shock of Tiananmen wares off and things start to calm down again the restrictions will once again start to come off. Well I hope. Unlike Singapore, it's a pretty big country to hold with an iron fist.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    1. Re:A little history lesson by solferino · · Score: 2, Interesting

      it's a pretty big country to hold with an iron fist.

      exactly - does china really have a future as a single big country? - with th south-east booming and leaving other areas (esp. the inland) far behind, with many different languages spoken, and with simply such a diverse country can the place really hold together?

      it seems we in 'th west' are as guilty of supporting th monolithic view of china, (which makes it easier for th authoritarian regime to maintain their illusion of power), with our tendency to think all chinese speak th same language, are of th same ethnic stock, etc. etc.

    2. Re:A little history lesson by mccalli · · Score: 0, Troll
      The problem is that when China looked around them to see what was successful they saw the Authoritarian capitalist states like Singapore, Korea and Taiwan.

      Errr....Taiwan was created by China as an experiment, and China still claims sovereignty over it. They certainly didn't look to Taiwan as an example.

      Cheers,
      Ian

    3. Re:A little history lesson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      exactly - does china really have a future as a single big country? - with th south-east booming and leaving other areas (esp. the inland) far behind, with many different languages spoken, and with simply such a diverse country can the place really hold together?

      The South-East is booming because they aren't landlocked. Is the Midwest in America booming? Didn't think so. Regarding the different languages spoken, yes, that's been an issue for hundreds of years there, but luckily, they decided not so long ago to create a lingua franca called 'Mandarin'. I hear there's a few hundred million speakers of this out there.

    4. Re:A little history lesson by 3seas · · Score: 2

      China now has Hong Kong and they intend to keep it capitalistic for it gives them a way to study it from all sides.

      There is something else as well. China is the only country doing economicly well right now. The reason for this is that they were not playing in the world stock market that has cause so much damage from the "card counters".

      As identified in the Trillion Dollar Bet!

      "In the summer of 1997, across Thailand, property prices plummeted. This sparked a panic that swept through Asia. As banks went bust from Japan to Indonesia, people took to the streets - events so improbable they had never been included in anyone's models."

      and in Indonesia May 1998: abcnews

      "Sources all over Asia tell Uscher that Asians know about local corruption but believe America is taking advantage of the situation to grab Asian
      markets and Asian wealth."

      and (read the article!!!): CNN

      "The austerity measures were a condition of the International Monetary Fund's $43 billion aid package to bail out the southeast Asian nation. "

      Where the US bailout was only (pbs article):
      "We expect that they're going to explain to the members of this Committee why the Federal Reserve has organized the $3.5 billion bail-out for billionaires, why Americans should be worried about the gambling practices of the Wall Street elite"

      And this rabbit hole goes deeper: More!

      But the point is: As man moves forward in his trial and error approach to society, there is a diversity kept in place so that all of mankind is unlikely to fall should things go bad. It was said The Former Soviet Union was mans experiment gone bad.....

      China is part of the Lab. Their entrance into the WTO only helps verify this. [shrug]

    5. Re:A little history lesson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just because Singapore's law is not the same as the US does not mean that it's 'Authoritarian' with a capital A. I'll trade being able to walk safety at night in the city for access to www.playboy.com anyday.

    6. Re:A little history lesson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can not throw bubblegum on the floor or spit on the floor without being canned in Singapore. You also can not walk safely at night there. If you do you are more sure to be hurt than in the United States. If you break the state curfew you will be flogged.

    7. Re:A little history lesson by Banjonardo · · Score: 1
      to study it from all sides

      Heh. All sides. GET IT? Hong Kong? All sides?

      --

      -----

      Score 3? For what? Being wrong, at length? - smirkleton

    8. Re:A little history lesson by John+Allsup · · Score: 1

      Though bear in mind that for a Chinese person to travel to and from Hong Kong they require permission -- it isn't as simple as driving from, say, Somerset to Norfolk (UK) or Texas to Tenessee (US). China and Hong Kong, though now owned as a whole by China, do not act like a single country. If and when that changes, only time will tell.

      --
      John_Chalisque
  61. Bud's legacy.... by Gandalf04 · · Score: 1

    Language barrier? What language barrier? With the web truely going global, we can all cheer "WASSSSSUUBBIIII" together!! "Dude, that was sooooo last year."

  62. Like theres freedom on western internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yeah right.

  63. Side By Side by wirefarm · · Score: 2

    Sure, Chinese may very well be the native language of most Internet users in 10 years, due to the giant size of the Chinese population, but any claims that this will cause some great shift in how the world uses the web is pretty silly.

    That pretty much nails it. Think about food: Some journalist may report that a huge percentage of the meals cooked in homes around the world are, guess what? You got it. Chinese food. Does that mean that you have to start learning to like Chinese food? No.

    India produces more movies than any other country in the world. Have you (Indians please pardon me,) had to learn Hindi to enjoy the movies that you watch?
    Same probably goes for books...

    Here in my office, I am the only American - I am also the sysadmin, so I get to see what sites people visit. I know that if I see google.com logged, it was probably me who hit the site.

    The people over here have their "own" internet in effect - one that in no way influences or limits an English speaker's ability to have an "All-English" experience.

    Cheers,
    Jim in Tokyo

    --
    -- My Weblog.
    1. Re:Side By Side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even if you learned Hindi, you still wouldn't enjoy those gaudy song-and-dance Hindi movies. It's just like Disney movies only get worse by knowning English.

  64. Yeh, well by autopr0n · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Look, you can learn what 'color' and 'font' mean without knowing the rest of it. And almost all localization schemes still allow you to type in the roman space.

    So while yeh, some things will be intuitive for English speakers, particularly things like APIs. while "font" might be easy javax.crypto.EncryptedPrivateKeyInfo (of course, Java does in fact allow Unicode for variable and class names, so you could have like .. as a package name).

    So, for a while I think most actual coding will be done in English, but that doesn't mean most website content will be. You could always have one web guy and one content guy as well. Or, for example you could use off the self software and fill it with localized content, (for example slashdot.jp).

    And lets not forget, Ruby, a programming language quickly gaining popularity was actually crated in Japan, where it's now more popular then Perl.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  65. -1, funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    how??? (OK I know how it could be done, but still...lame)

  66. Yes. by Colin+Smith · · Score: 2

    Language is a protocol, the sooner we all speak the same language, the better and whether you like it or not, English is that language.

    --
    Deleted
    1. Re:Yes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      What if you have two protocols like FireWire® and USB® both fill their own niches superbly? Why use one for the puroposes of the other?

      Stupid analogy as usual from a Slashdotter.

    2. Re:Yes. by mizhi · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's precisely that attitude that causes foreign people to view the west with more than a bit of trepedition. We come off with the attitude that we don't care about other cultures, other languages, and are too lazy to speak anything other than English but still want to do business with non-English speakers.

      By the way, Chinese happens to have quite a bit of elegance to it and is really quite beautiful. I'm glad I study it. English, otoh, is the nasty bastard step-child of an amalgamation of other nasty languages. :-D

      --
      Humorless sig goes here.
    3. Re:Yes. by cockeater · · Score: 0

      Old norse is a beautiful language as well

    4. Re:Yes. by drsquare · · Score: 1

      Except for the small fact that English uses a maximum of 52 letters (including capitals). Can you say the same about Chinese?

    5. Re:Yes. by mizhi · · Score: 2

      No, but then again, I think Chinese characters are beautiful. Writing them is considered an artform and many styles of calligraphy have been developed for it. From a utilitarian standpoint, the roman alphabet is more efficient. But utility isn't everything in life. While I've found studying Chinese to be very difficult and frustrating at times, I still love the script which is one of the things that got me learning the langauge in the first place.

      --
      Humorless sig goes here.
    6. Re:Yes. by Banjonardo · · Score: 1
      Language is a protocol, the sooner we all speak the same language, the better and whether you like it or not, English is that language.

      If you, oh Colin Smith, spoke natively another language (Romance Languages would do) you would realize how incredibly brutish the english language really is.

      --

      -----

      Score 3? For what? Being wrong, at length? - smirkleton

    7. Re:Yes. by KewlPC · · Score: 1

      Could it be possible that the reason you consider English to be such a brutish language is because you only hear it spoken brutishly? I have a hard time imagining that everyone in Brazil speaks English as well as even an American who comes from "The South" (someone from south-eastern America).

      Or perhaps it is because you are not a native English speaker. You may have learned English at age 10, but the fact that you claim to have learned English on only six months demonstrates that you probably do not speak English as well as you let on, *especially* when one considers that it takes people *years* to learn their native language well.

  67. Taiwan != mainland by autopr0n · · Score: 2

    Most of the Commodity PC stuff we Americans get comes from Taiwan, witch is run by the legitimate Capitalist Chinese government, witch fled there after the country got taken over by the Communists. and by "Legitimate" I mean "Liked by the West". They still call themselves "The Republic of China" (Even though they didn't have elections until the 1990s.) In fact, up until the 1970's they actually got to sit in on the UN security console in the "china" spot. Now they're not in the UN at all.

    Someone else mentioned making knockoffs of Taiwanese hardware, though. But I don't know about a PC clone for $9, even in mainland china. I'd bet you could make a decent 'console' type machine with that much there, though.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    1. Re:Taiwan != mainland by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      which witch?

    2. Re:Taiwan != mainland by jaoswald · · Score: 2

      "From Taiwan-based company" != "manufactured/assembled in Taiwan"

      The trend in Taiwan, as elsewhere, is to outsource more and more of the lower-tech work to the mainland. For those who are worried about the PRC's growing economic power, this is a major theme. For those who are worried about the ROC being able to maintain an independent existence from the PRC, this "hollowing out" of Taiwan industry is a serious concern.

      For those who like to buy $400 PCs, it is a great thing.

  68. Not exactly by autopr0n · · Score: 2

    China hasn't really been a 'communistic' state since Mao died. Nowadays they're trying to emulate western Europe's 'socialism', but with out that 'intellectual freedom and democracy' stuff that might cause them to lose power.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  69. What concerns me.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is not that chinese will become the dominant 'langauge' (after all communication is what the Internet is all about), its that all the patent/copyright/DMCA bullshit will make me have to learn chinese just so i can get on with earning a living.

  70. Re: Close, but not quite... by taiwanjohn · · Score: 1
    ? = di (ordinal prefix)
    ? = yi (one)
    ? = gang (post, as in "position" or "job")

    What you want is (I think) di-yi kan (publish) or perhaps di-yi yan (word)... Anyone else know for sure?

    Sorry, I can't supply the GB codes, as I don't have xcin on this machine. And, after multiple tries, I can't get Slashcode to accept your originals (cut-n-pasted) without converting them to question marks. (How'd you do that?)

    --jrd

    --
    XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve your problem, you're not using enough of it. --AC
  71. Mathematically correct? by seebs · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This is unclear. Many many more Chinese speak English than other people speak Chinese. Just as Latin continued to be the main Church language, even in areas where it was not otherwise widely used, English may dominate on the internet whether or not the majority of current users are native English speakers.

    --
    My blog: http://www.seebs.net/log/ --- My iPhone/iPad app: http://www.seebs.net/seebsfrac/
  72. India by autopr0n · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Don't forget India. (and Pakistan). Both have large English speaking populations (as a second language for a lot of people, though) India, in fact, uses English in the government. I'm not sure about Pakistan though.

    Of course, unlike the US, England, etc, India has lots of native languages as well.

    Oh, one other thing. All Chinese students need to have minimum competency in English in order to get into collage. More people may speak Chinese well, but English is really starting to become a sort of lingua fracia. Of course, soon enough instant translation will take over and the idea of learning another language will be a quaint little hobby.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  73. Perspective Via Elvis by Effugas · · Score: 5, Funny

    From: gascan@dcst16.pt (Bill Gascoyne)
    Newsgroups: talk.origins
    Subject: The dangers of extrapolation (was Re: Speed of Light

    A cautionary thought on the dangers of extrapolation.

    It is reported that in 1977 there were 37 Elvis impersonators in the world.
    In 1993 there were 48,000. At this rate, by the year 2010 one out of every
    three people in the world will be an Elvis impersonator.

    :-)

    1. Re:Perspective Via Elvis by Technik~ · · Score: 1

      Do you have a link for that attribution? It's not in google Usenet archive.

    2. Re:Perspective Via Elvis by Rayonic · · Score: 1

      Does that mean we all have to learn Elvish?

    3. Re:Perspective Via Elvis by Effugas · · Score: 2

      The google archive is still moderately incomplete. I got this link from 3s7bm2$il6@inet-nntp-gw-1.us.oracle.com (it was reposted in alt.humor.best-of-usenet).

      I'm going to crawl my personal usenet archives and see how much of it is missing from GooJa.

      --Dan

  74. I doubt it by autopr0n · · Score: 2

    French culture would still be french if english words were used. Well. Maybe it would lose some of it's snootyness.

    But I really don't think having the rudementary english needed to get into higher education in china is really going to hurt their culture. Fuck. Mao pretty much destroyed traditional chinese culture anyway. Anything that might change is only going to be a few decades old anyway. Anything that's the same as it always was isn't going to change at all

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  75. General Language Evolution by den_erpel · · Score: 1

    Even though Chinese might become one of the big languages on the net, I don't think it will ever become the mainstream language. That role, my friends, I see reserved for English.Let me explain.
    First of all, I want to stress that I myself am not a native English speaker.
    If one looks at the general evolution of languages in Europe (and by extension in America(?)), I think you can notice there is an overall trend to simplicity. I do not think this has to do with the education level or intelligence of the people speaking the language (as some might imply), but by having a clear way of communicating.
    If I remember correctly, Celtic had conjugations at the end of a word AND in the beginning. Latin had it only in the end. In the middle ages, most conjugations were dropped from languages or (in the case of English) evolved to some kind of simple mixture.
    At this point, English has little exceptions, very little conjugations (or simple, as well as for the verb as for the nouns) AND it uses a simple character set to write (no umlauts and other things). And it's alive and spoken by a good deal of the world population
    Let me put this in perspective. I myself am Flemish (a Dutch variant). The smaller half of the country speaks French (Belgium), and we got French before we learnt English. A good portion of the Flemish has studied German (another language in this country). Everyone of these languages has a grammar far more intricate than English (not to speak about the accents French has on e's).
    Still most of the Flemish clearly prefer to use English in a professional environment even considerig the demographical composition of the country... Why you would ask? Right.
    I think it is relatively safe to hope that English will become the language in the Western World.
    Now, if we come back to the Chinese, as far as I know (and I have had a couple of Chinese collegues), Chinese does not posses any of the advantages: it has a very large character set, a difficult prononciation with variations in how you pronounce a word and no easy to cathegorise grammar.
    I guess the step to Chines as a e-language is just to great for the rest of the world and I guess this is a good thing, considering the alternative...

    --
    Genius doesn't work on an assembly line basis. You can't simply say, "Today I will be brilliant."
  76. Nope by autopr0n · · Score: 2

    Japanese cannot really read Chinese stuff. First of all, mainlanders use simplified Chinese, whereas Japanese use older style for their Kanji. And secondly Chinese use way more characters.

    It's actually easier for Chinese people to read Japanese stuff then for Japanese to read Chinese. (except for the Hiragana and Katakana, of course)

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    1. Re:Nope by klui · · Score: 1

      Japan had a simplification period for Kanji as well. Currently, Kanji is a mixture of traditional, simplified, and unique ideographs.

  77. robots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    robot: "what is thy bidding, my master?"

  78. Re: Teaching pinyin... by taiwanjohn · · Score: 1
    unless you propose to teach the entire population pinyin

    Most of the population already do know pinyin. It's the phonetic transcription system used in Chinese schools to teach little Chinese kids how to read and write. The literacy rate (hard to judge accurately in a police state) is listed by the CIA World Factbook as 81%.

    BTW, they have nowhere NEAR a million symbols in Chinese. Some estimates range as high as 80,000 but the average college grad only knows about 6~8 thousand. Basic literacy is considered to be 3,000 or so...

    That said, I agree with the general attitude that the article is way off-base. It's going to be a LONG time before Chinese "takes over" the 'net!

    --jrd

    --
    XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve your problem, you're not using enough of it. --AC
  79. Idiot. by autopr0n · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Do you have any idea how many people live in Chinese cities? Hundreds of millions. There is a hell of a lot of Zhongwen on the web already, despite "This show I saw on PBS".

    Anyway, no culture or language is going to have much "influence" on the web outside of their own worlds. English speaking people are going to read English web pages and Chinese people are going to read Chinese web pages. It really makes no difference to anyone else.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  80. Why would it change? by CheeseMunkie · · Score: 1

    The internet is already popular in lots of places where English is not the primary language, yet English is still the primary language for (guesstimate) 90% of the internet. I'm speaking primarily of places like Sweden, Denmark, Finland, Norway... The people there speak English online.

    Besides, ASCII (or ANSI) is already pretty basic to the way the internet is structured; it would be pretty hard to implement Chinese pictographs into all our software. (Yes I know it's been done, but that's hardly an elegant solution any way you look at it.)

    Anyone in a technical field is going to have to speak English anyway, to read the error messages and RFCs if nothing else, and generally the techies are on the internet before normal humans anyway.

    Given all this, and probably more points I haven't thought of yet, I imagine the main effect of internet in China will be more Chinese learning English than workarounds to support their unsupportable language structure.

  81. Language won't be a problem by ZigMonty · · Score: 2

    And how is the Internet supposed to draw people together when the same old language barrier still exists?"

    Are you sure it will? Two words: machine translation. It is starting to get good now and by the time most Chinese people have unrestricted access to the net, it should be much better. I'm not saying that the software will translate Shakespeare perfectly but do human translators? My guess is that it'll help cross the barrier better than people who speak a language as their second but aren't professional linguists.

    We will have the same problem we've had for millennia but soon we will have a means to solve it. How good was machine translation 10 years ago?

    1. Re:Language won't be a problem by haruharaharu · · Score: 2

      I'm not saying that the software will translate Shakespeare perfectly but do human translators?

      Nobody can. Shakespeare requires too much cultural context to just be translated for someone who lacks that context. You may as well translate 'The Sound of Waves'

      --
      Reboot macht Frei.
  82. According to Accenture, it will... but earlier by DavidpFitz · · Score: 3, Informative

    Accenture -- formerly Andersen Consulting -- reckon this will happen by 2007. It's worth a read... especially the links at the bottom talking about cultural pollution (not necessarily in a negative sense!)

    They're not often wrong.

    The figures reckon that one billion people in China will be connecting to the Web by the year 2007. It sounds a it optomistic to me, and what exactly does "connecting to the web" mean. Someone who owns a PC and is connected... or just someone who uses a CyberCafe? I wonder if in China "people per IP" would be much higher than in Europe or America.

    1. Re:According to Accenture, it will... but earlier by sql*kitten · · Score: 2

      Accenture [accenture.com] -- formerly Andersen Consulting -- reckon this will happen by 2007 [accenture.com]. It's worth a read... especially the links at the bottom talking about cultural pollution (not necessarily in a negative sense!)

      They're not often wrong.


      Tell that to all the employees they've laid off this year... Ass-enter is as much a smoke-and-mirrors outfit as you're likely to see...

    2. Re:According to Accenture, it will... but earlier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So they're saying that 80% of China's total population (men, women, children, senior citizens, etc.) will be online in 6 years? I find that hard to believe.

  83. Re: Input methods... by taiwanjohn · · Score: 1
    There are dozens of schemes for entering Chinese text on a QWERTY keyboard. Some are simple tree lookups based on phonetics... type in the letters "ji" and the numeral "1" (for the tone marker) and you get a list of the most common characters with that pronunciation (machine, chicken, table, etc...) from which you choose the one you want.

    There are other systems where you type keystrokes which map to character elements, such as individual brush-strokes or radicals, which helps sort through the list. Most people use the phonetic methods, since they're easier to learn, but "professional" typists are trained in the other methods because they're faster if you've got the skill to use them.

    Even with the phonetic systems, you can type most characters with 5 or 6 keystrokes. Intelligent "context sensitive" systems make it even easier...

    --jrd

    --
    XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve your problem, you're not using enough of it. --AC
  84. Re:Idiot? Ummm, no. by Bowie+J.+Poag · · Score: 1, Flamebait



    "Do you have any idea how many people live in Chinese cities? Hundreds of millions."

    Mind if I move your bong, Sherlock?

    The largest city in the world only (Tokyo) contains about 28 million people, followed by New York with about 20 million, not the "hundreds of millions" you're hallucinating about.

    Here, ride the snake with some stats, ya moron:

    Top 10 Most Populated Cities On Earth

    --
    Bowie J. Poag

  85. Use HTML entity codes by autopr0n · · Score: 2

    like &12345; where '12345' is replaced by the character code. I usually use M$ word, save as HTML and then cut out the produced HTML entity codes.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  86. Parent's Link is Clever Goat Sex by intmainvoid · · Score: 1, Troll
    Look's like naming the site in brackets after a link in a comment doesn't cure everything. The html in the link text above is:


    <A HREF="http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=china -internet/images/usage.gif%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20 %20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%2 0%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20% 20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20 %20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%2 0%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20% 20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20 %20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%2 0%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20% 20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20 %20%20%20%20&imgrefurl=http://www.goatse.cx">ch ina-internet.gif&lt/A>

    You don't see the goatse.cx bit in the status bar, because the spaces push it off the right of your screen. Pretty clever, even if it is stealing an idea from another story!

  87. No by autopr0n · · Score: 3, Informative

    The vast majority of computers in china use Qwerty keyboards. Then an intelligent layer between the raw input and the application converts it into Kanji or whatever. They even work on context (at least the Microsoft software I have does). so if you type in "shi" you might get 'is', but if you type in "shi jian" the first "shi" will be the word for 'time'.

    If you have a higher-end Nokia phone you know what that's like. You can type regular English on a 9 key keyboard and you only have to hit each key once. It's a rather weird feeling, but it works.

    Actually 'intelligent layers' are good enough that Trendy teens in Japan can actually type kanji on telephone keypads!

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    1. Re:No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hanzi, kanji is the japanese word for chinese based characters

  88. china has a universal language? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And what language would that be?
    ppl in Peking don't speak the same language as the people of Canton. Although the china government might want to dissagree with me the fact remains that china is still divided by language. It is a country of many languages with one army that says there is only one language.

    hook

  89. Eh by autopr0n · · Score: 2

    The Chinese government pretty much did "end" when Mao died. Deng Xiaoping and the others who took over made a lot of changes.

    And when you add 'eventually' to the sentence... well, I don't think that there's much of a chance for this government to last more then a few hundred years. None of the dynasties ever lasted that long. I don't know why this authoritarian government would either.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  90. What do you propose? by autopr0n · · Score: 2

    Not Waid-Gails. I mean, that has gay (phoneticaly) right in it? I mean you don't even have to alter it much.

    It's all about the pinyin. but without the tone indicators. Tone indicators are for posers and real Chinese people.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  91. Uh, right by autopr0n · · Score: 2

    Certainly in the computer language everyone uses the same protocols and standards and coding languages.

    If the 'real world' becomes anything like the computer world, people will continue stay incompatibly with each other while mindless zealots crop up on either side and duke it on news groups. Witch I guess would be an improvement over the current state where we just shoot each other.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  92. drawing people together by kraada · · Score: 1

    And how is the Internet supposed to draw people together when the same old language barrier still exists?

    one word: babelfish.

  93. BIND by autopr0n · · Score: 2

    Actualy, newer versions of bind support some sort of internationalization. even though it totaly violates standards.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  94. Not what was meant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was speaking in the context of the original theme, which talked about Chinese displacing English as the predominant language of the Internet.

    Interpreting my phrase 'will replace' as meaning English will be taken down and substituted with Chinese is taking my comment out of context, as it relates to the thread.

    No one would expect English to be literally replaced.

    English will be around for anyone that wants it. But if your interest in the Internet is more than passing or passive, you should be prepared for other forms of linguistic communication.

    Just like money... Right now, you can use at least three forms of currency inside China. The USD is one of them, because it is a dominant currency. But if the dollar was not dominant, you would need another form of chattle...you would need whatever currency was popular.

  95. Chinese as english complexity by autopr0n · · Score: 3, Informative

    If there was an award for talking out of you're ass, you'd probably stand a good chance of winning. As an American studying Chinese, I can say almost certainly that Chinese is a far, far simpler language then English.

    Chinese, as far as I know (and I have had a couple of Chinese collegues), Chinese does not posses any of the advantages: it has a very large character set, a difficult prononciation with variations in how you pronounce a word and no easy to cathegorise grammar.


    Wrong, wrong wrong. I don't know exactly what you mean by 'easy to categories grammar' but Chinese grammar itself is much, much simpler then English grammar. There are regional differences in pronunciation of Chinese, just as there are regional differences in the way English is spoke. There are no changes due to grammar however. Every word has the same sound regardless of it's grammatical frame (unlike English with "drive, drove, driving driven," and worse "is, be, being, was"). Also, when using the Pin-Yin system of Romanization pronunciation is not difficult at all. Certainly not any more difficult that that of a Chinese person or any one else for that matter trying to speak English.

    Finally, Chinese characters are for the most part made from smaller characters and easily recognizable/memorable subcomponents. Writing and remembering characters is like spelling on a grid rather then on a straight line. Writing and memorizing them isn't difficult at all once you get the hang of it.

    Of course, getting them into computers has been a problem in the past, but, modern technology has allowed their use pretty much without problems.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    1. Re:Chinese as english complexity by 3seas · · Score: 2

      "Of course, getting them into computers has been a problem in the past, but, modern technology has allowed their use pretty much without problems."

      Any links to such uhhhh, keyboarding?
      Or is this somehing to be better dealt with in voice to text processing?

      Translation is where it's at in any case, but am interested in any links.

    2. Re:Chinese as english complexity by den_erpel · · Score: 1

      Well, since you're more experienced in English (? not seeing the grammatical errors in your post) and in Chinese, I guess I'll have to consider those words.
      My impressions came from (second hand) a friend that was learning Chinese and a two collegues (former, they're gone now).
      The Chinese always assured my it was difficult and had exceptions. Who was I to argue, I just extrapolated this view, ..

      --
      Genius doesn't work on an assembly line basis. You can't simply say, "Today I will be brilliant."
    3. Re:Chinese as english complexity by pnuema · · Score: 1

      All of this discussion of language is interesting, but I haven't heard anyone state the advantage English has over any other language in the world: its richness. Yes, English is difficult to learn, has crazy rules, and the only reason it is spoken so widely is because of American Imperialism(tm). However, it is possible to communicate subtleties in English that are extraordinarily difficult in other languages. For example, think of how many ways you can describe a king in English (off the top of my head here): kingly, regal, royal, imperial, majestic, stately...each of these words has slightly different meaning, but all describe kings. To the best of my knowledge no other language in the world can match English for sheer synonym power. Of course, there are some concepts English doesn't handle well, and are better addressed with other languages. But when that happens, we just go steal words and phrases from other languages to supplement ours. How many know what gestalt is, or espirit de escalair (sp?)? Point is, language is just a tool. Want great flexibility and subltety in your language? Use English. Want to talk metaphysiscs? Use Chinese. Romance? French or Italian. (Anybody tell I'm a Frank Herbert nut? :)

    4. Re:Chinese as english complexity by autopr0n · · Score: 2

      Actually, it comes standard on win2k and can be downloaded for 9x. Don't know about Linux though. Just do a google search for "Chinese IME windows" etc. Of course you'll need to know Pinyin to enter simplified and Bopomofo (I think) in order to type it in.

      --
      autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    5. Re:Chinese as english complexity by Dahan · · Score: 2

      It takes more effort to learn, but Changjie is faster (page is in Chinese, but the rightmost column pretty much explains how it works). You know that recent James Bond movie with the Chinese girl? The Chinese computer they showed had a Changjie keyboard.

    6. Re:Chinese as english complexity by klui · · Score: 1

      Every word has the same sound regardless of it's grammatical frame

      Not entirely true. There are exceptions although a lot less than that of English. An example is the second character of "bank" where it is pronounced differently when used in another part of a noun or context.

      English is quite confusing for beginners because it borrows so much from other languages and there are many exceptions, and different meanings and pronounciation for words with the same spelling.

  96. Almost certanly by autopr0n · · Score: 1

    China has had these issues for thouands of years and remained a consistant whole for almost all of that time. Who knows what'll happen in the future, but I seriously doubt a long term breakup is in the works

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  97. WTF? by autopr0n · · Score: 2

    I didn't say they all lived in the same city, dumbas. There are hundreds of millions of urban americans yet by your logic we would only have 30 million or so (going by that list, only two of our cities are listed)

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  98. Whatever by autopr0n · · Score: 1

    I think more americans (at lest geeks) are familiar with "kanji" then "hanzi". Besides if I wrote "hanzi" they would go off saying "han-zee" like a bunch of morons. That problem is not as pronounced kanji

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    1. Re:Whatever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No offence, but I am not American and don't really care what they do or don't know :)

      Han zi is correct.

    2. Re:Whatever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How the hell DO you pronounce it? Phonics makes things soooo much easier....

    3. Re:Whatever by autopr0n · · Score: 2

      Han zuh (rimes with 'duh', but not quite so much emphasis on the 'u' sound)

      --
      autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  99. And... by NaCh0 · · Score: 0, Troll

    And don't forget that all new websites will be named by throwing silverware down the stairs.

  100. And do YOU think you're really in the Internet? by seu · · Score: 1

    >Would you even consider the average wealthy Chinese citizen with online access truly 'on the Internet'?

    As I see it, there's also a lot of censorship in the USA. Children in schools are really on the Internet? People who use AOL are really on the Internet?
    Also, nowadays, people with only a 33.6k modem are really on the Internet?

    Think about it.

    --
    Seu -
  101. Oh Man (rubbing hands together) .... by ReidMaynard · · Score: 1

    Oh Man, do I smell a market for pop-up ads....

    Imagine the bandwidth/backbone need to handle 100,000,000,000 stupid pop-ups a day...forget the data/language.

    First off though, I don't image much traffic comming out (non-chinese, going to chinese web sites. Second, if most chinese don't speak English, they will not surf outside chinese ("China") websites. I can't see the traffic to china being much greater than .25% of the USA-Europe traffic. Unless..

    Unless..the equivelent of the "Wall Falling" happens in China, like it did in the USSR..which a few are saying is likely to happen by 2010-2020 or so...

    --
    -- www.globaltics.net

    Political discussion for a new world

  102. civil liberties by pigeon · · Score: 1

    "places without certain civil liberties". You mean like the USA? DCMA + offspring..

  103. What does it matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And someone also predicted that men will be obsolete soon. So I guess all we have to look forward to is a bunch of chineese speaking women on the internet. But wait, aren't there more men than women in China? Wouldn't that mean that more than 1/2 of the population is obsolete and will be phased out? If so, then that will reduce the number of people speaking Chineese by 1/2 and so it won't be the most common language! Of course this will only happen if a computer based AI doesn't take over the world first and turn us all into batteries.

  104. Re:Idiot? Ummm, no. by AtomicBomb · · Score: 1

    I am afraid your stat is a bit incomprehensive. In terms of biggest metropolitan area, you are right. Many agree that should be the greater Tokyo region, somewhere under 30M.

    While China does not have a single metropolitan area as big as 30M, it does not invalidate the fact that it has well more than 100M living in cities.

    http://www.citypopulation.de/Country.html?E,Chin a
    If you just count 24 province centres, the total is already 75M. Many provinces have more than 1 cities. Officially, non-rural dweller is about 300M in China.

    The most misleading thing is many cities are misclassified as rural towns. No one really cares about changing the designation. A friend of mine's grandfather is living in "town" in GuangDong, which has got a population of close to 1 million. It was largely a farming area 20yrs ago. But, it is now a major manufacturing base in the region....

  105. it is not limited to computers... by john_uy · · Score: 1

    in the future, the Internet will not be accessed by computers, it will from mobile users whether it may be from mobile phones, wireless pda, watches, and other gadgets.

    in an article from CNN China cell-phone use hits 140 million there are 140m cellphone users beating US with 118m.

    so if everybody uses their 3g phones to access information and majority of the mobile phone users are chinese, then indeed chinese can outbeat english in internet use in less than 10 years.

    let say that 4m people are added every month in 10 years, 4m x 12months x 10 years = 480m. the current population of the us is only around 286m according to US census. although the us population will grow, the us mobile phone usage is around 50% so after 10 years, the mobile users of china will definitely be more than internet and mobile users.

    and if you say that most of there population is at the country side, i will say it is correct. but the number of people living in the urban areas also reache hundreds of millions. a small province in china has population more than most countries in the world.

    --
    Live your life each day as if it was your last.
  106. Typical. by SparkyUK · · Score: 1

    Would you even consider the average wealthy Chinese citizen with online access truly 'on the Internet'?

    What typical elitist crap.

    This is just another way of saying You may have the same advantages and access as me but you will neve truly be one of us. Why? Because they won't share your English-speaking, Amero-centric, left-of-center, hamburger & apple pie world-view? Give me a break.

    This is exactly the attitude that the Aristocracy take with the Nouveau Riche once the lower classes start to gain money and power in any society : "You can dress like us, haunt the same places as us, own the things we do, talk like us but you will never be us"

    We are the Tech-savvy aristocracy of the 00's, we must accept that we represent a tiny, tiny proportion of world-society and that our place in the Internet world order will become increasingly eroded and yes, irrelevant, as the masses pile in. If you thought AOL's introduction of the hoi-polloi to the internet changed the internet forever you ain't seen nothing yet.

    Get over it. There'll still be places like /. where we can gather to whine about it.

    1. Re:Typical. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you missed the point. Let me rephrase that for you...

      Would you really consider a Chinese citizen whose internet access is circumscribed by government mandated content control and network blocking software to be truly 'on the Internet'?

  107. Chinese is the most used first language, but . . . by ptrourke · · Score: 1

    Assuming the Internet becomes a truly global entity, this is an obvious (and mathematically correct) conclusion.

    Only if you're talking about first languages. I think if you look at the numbers of persons who use a language as their first or second language, there's a statistical tie between English and Chinese, or English comes out slightly ahead.

    See David Crystal, English as a Global Language, which has the exact statistics.

    Don't put too much hope in machine translation. Eventually, machine translation will end up working like Graffitti on the Palm or older voice recognition software: in order for something to be translated properly, you'll have to write in a style that the translation engine will understand.

  108. Chinese grammar by b1t+r0t · · Score: 2
    IBM's 'alphaworks' site had a english->chinese translation system (a long with other languages) online that actualy worked pretty well (or at least seemed to) Actualy working out the grammar as well as the words so you wouldn't end up with incoherent jiberish

    I understand that grammatical word order in Chinese is pretty close to that of English. It's pronouncing those tonal shifts that's the hard part for us gwai-lo. If they made it work with translation to and from Japanese (or even Klingon, which intentionally had a fucked up word order), then you'd have something.

    --

    --
    "Open source is good." - Steve Jobs
    "Open source is evil." - Microsoft
    1. Re:Chinese grammar by Daengbo · · Score: 1, Informative

      You are confused. "Chinese has no word order." -- my platoon sergeant at language school (and speaks it much better than I do). Anyway, from my language studies in Beijing, I will say that it follows the SVO model most of the time, similar to English.

  109. damn gooks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The San Francisco Chronicle has an article discussing the World Intellectual Property Organization's prediction that in less than 10 years, Chinese will be the most widely-used language on the web.

  110. Bad EU-English by SgtChaireBourne · · Score: 1

    English and English-like variants will stay on top for a long time.

    Accusations of U.S.-centricity (I hope that's not a word) are frequent in Europe. However, if the issue of language and culture is avoided, then I've found most people will use English when working with foreigners. In international projects, participants will insist on English just to keep the French^H^H^H^H^H^H other groups under control or from gaining too much advantage. English is a second (or third or fourth) language for a great many people and using it puts the group on more or less equal footing.

    autopr0n already mentioned India where English is the least common denominator among the educated. Education and / or money being key prerequisites for Internet usage. China has a similar situation with so many mutually unintelligable spoken languages and use of English among many of the educated.

    Then you have technological inertia; most systems and programming langages are derived from ASCII-based ones making it difficult to use even Western European languages. Odds are that unless there is a lot of coordinated effort and investment to recreate a Chinese Internet, Chinese that know English will find it more convenient to keep using English-variants as the de facto language standard.

    --
    Beta is broken and the link to classic doesn't work. Stop wasting our time or there won't be anybody left here.
  111. Microsoft Communications .NET? by Jugalator · · Score: 1

    I'm sure MS will somehow manage to force us speak in a natural language counterpart to MSIL (Microsoft Intermediate Language) that's extensively used in Visual Studio .NET as the "lowest common denominator" between the languages in the .NET platform.

    Like this:


    method public hidebysig instance class System.Object Hello_Slashdot() il managed {

    // Code size 43 (0x2b)
    .maxstack 4
    .locals ([0] class System.Object V_0, [1] int32 V_1)
    IL_0000: ldarg.0
    IL_0001: ldfld int32 Stack::m_size
    IL_0006: brtrue.s IL_000e
    IL_0008: newobj instance void ['msnaturalcomm']
    IL_000a: ldint GENERIC_GREETING_PHRASE
    IL_000e: ldstr "Slashdot"


    Would be just another milestone for their strategy to conquer the world.

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  112. 6,800 Languages, which to choose by jhines0042 · · Score: 1


    The Ethnologue language name index list the 6,800 (not a typo) langauges in use today.

    Check it out.

    --
    42 - So long and thanks for all the fish.
    1. Re:6,800 Languages, which to choose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Read the site before you post these things. This site includes extinct languages and in many cases counts different dialects of a language to be different languages. (For instance, Creole English consists of a combination of English and French, with few uniquely Creole words).

  113. Language Barrier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    how is the Internet supposed to draw people together when the same old language barrier still exists?

    That's easy. We'll all just have to learn Chinese.

    We might discover what the rest of the world feels like having to learn a foreign language just to use the 'net.

  114. chiiiiina by Rage+Maxis · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Well, for starters ... I work for a chinese import/export/do anything else for money - type of company in Markham, Ontario, Canada. We do a great deal of our business in chinese as well (i am a gwai lo) and most of our customers are chinese. Lately we have been mostly exporting computer equipment rather than important, as the market has taken a massive twist -- they will pay us *any* price for the very hardware that was made in china in the first place ... but that they could never afford. Pentium and 486 computers (especially linux compatible ones) are bought up by the container load as fast as we can get them... and they want them badly! That is where the internet growth is. The internet grew in big business... yes. But the internet really caught on through email, even before the internet ... fidonet.

    There are two major problems with Chinese internet.
    1) The chinese language is extremely effective at keeping people under the control of the nation. The chiense language from a linguistical standpoint is incredibly primitive and basically useless. Its chief advantage is that chinese are proud of their language and assume that other languages are equally hard to learn.

    The issue here is that it is an evolved symbolistical character set which is *very* difficult to use effectively on a computer

    also, it has a ... culturally normalizing effect, because it actually *stifles* the free transit of ideas because people jsut don't know what alot of the words are ... and the majority of chinese can barely read or write whatever language they do speak. The key to wealth in china is through education. This is partly the problems behind the Cultural Revolution and various other things at other times in China ... in china, both information and the spread of information have a massively destabilizing effect.

    2) Chinese people do not communicate (no hong kong people) ... Like other countries with poorly developed and highly regionalized languages, especially those who rely so heavily on cultural and systematic tradition there is little to no new communication and even basic human function can be stifled.

    So what I am sayign is, legions of identical chinese language websites will do very little to change the status quo in china. Access to outside information is of little use either ... because translation via automated means to chinese is basically impossible, and even then only the rich and elite could ever udnerstand what is actually *written*.

    Additionally, remember how many people had to suffer for that plastic toy or television set you just bought. Underpricing through inhumane labour has destroyed our ability to sustain our markets, and it has created a general hatred of the US outside of china ... henry ford was right on the money when he said that workers needed to be able to afford whatever they are making!!!

    The long term solution here is to 1) destabilize the chinese economy to prevent it from becoming reliant on handouts and technology-indebtedness
    2) encourage the use of real languages like Hangeul (check it out, its amazing) Russian, English or any other decent alphabetic language
    3) Provide content that is easier to read, i.e. less buzzwords, shorter words, less crap.
    4) Provide translated websites with limited content to give "hints" and get people excited, i.e. giving them incentives to learn a decent language.

    My analogy of china is a bunch of people who each know about 1% of the cobol language, walking around doing the dirty grudge labour for the masses of the world who know C++, Perl, etc.

    Anyways, that is my flamebait for today.

    RageMaxis

    --
    --- ask me about nihilism, I will have nothing to tell you.
    1. Re:chiiiiina by lamj · · Score: 1

      I disagree with your points on long term solution.

      Chinese language has such a long heritage (older than English), it is difficult to introduce any changes to it. Even Chinese government's effort into simplified Chinese which should make Chinese easier to read and write is just creating a lot of confusion (but it works), do we want to go through the trouble of inventing another language?

      Chinese language is much more concise, much less character to represent a meaningful sentence (one of the most concise language). Most characters have MANY different meanings (depends on the context of usage), sort of like one character of Chinese would represent a word in english.

      If you are wonder how Chinese people can master such difficult language, most Chinese parents are very proud of the language and it is a shame to not let the child to learn Chinese. Plus the fact that it is a Chinese tradition that the child have extreme respect for the parents. This all make the forceful learning (or memorization of characters) becomes much easier. Not to mention that punishment from parents (physical) are consider to be ok.

  115. XHTML in foreign language by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since XHTML is "extensible", and Unicode based, someone can easily invent a XML definition of a "chinese-based HTML", then allow the definition itself to do the translation back to english tags. But to the coder, the ENTIRE "CXHTML" code and content will be in Chinese...yet any XML-enabled browser can display the page correctly.

    It's not HTML that enables a true WORLD-WIDE web, but rather, the extensibility of XML.

  116. Replacing a hard to learn lanuage with a harder .. by danielobvt · · Score: 1

    one. Yah! Go team! And people say that the internet is making life easier.

  117. ... misspelt by an american in the first place by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but what do you expect from the country that produced dan quayle?

    1. Re:... misspelt by an american in the first place by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Suck it eurotrash. Your weak, socialist, bitches. We laugh at you. Oh, and your women are fucking butt-ugly

  118. *Wealthy* Chinese citizens? Of course by quartz · · Score: 1

    Would you even consider the average wealthy Chinese citizen with online access truly 'on the Internet'?

    Maybe I wouldn't, but I bet 2 million American homeless people would.

  119. Correction by Kiwi · · Score: 2
    Those miningco.com statistics are wrong. The most populated city in the world is actually Mexico city, with about 30 million people. I don't know where miningco got that 18.1 million number from.

    In more detail, Mexico City officially has 25 million people, but there are 5 million or more native Americans who live in Mexico city, but aren't "officially" there.

    And, about the flame war, some thoughts:

    • Don't get overly emotional when posting here.
    • I think having a web not dominated by English would be a good thing.
    - Sam
    --

    The secret to enjoying Slashdot is to realize that it should not be taken too seriously.

    1. Re:Correction by gol64738 · · Score: 1

      In more detail, Mexico City officially has 25 million people, but there are 5 million or more native Americans who live in Mexico city, but aren't "officially" there.

      wow, in contrast to Los Angeles, which only has 5 million people, but you'd swear there were 25 million or more native Mexicans who aren't 'officially' there.

  120. Language Barrier by phillymjs · · Score: 3, Funny

    And how is the Internet supposed to draw people together when the same old language barrier still exists?"

    Because on the Internet, we can communicate through the universal language of pr0n. Well, unless you're in one o' them loser countries that filters it out.

    ~Philly

  121. John "MadDog" Hall prediction by suso · · Score: 1

    John "MadDog" Hall made a prediction during his speech this year at ApacheCon that Mandarin Chinese will be the dominant language in the world by 2006. He suggested that we all learn it now.

    I'm planning on learning it after I've mastered Russian.

    1. Re:John "MadDog" Hall prediction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Adn what makes him so qualified to make predictions like that ?

  122. education. by Rev.+DeFiLEZ · · Score: 1

    and ppl wonder why (and make fun) when i tell them i am learning mandarin (i'm still not consistant with the 4 tones).

    just look how far western cultures have come in the past 100 years, and the chinese dont even have to invent stuff, just buy it. (not entirely true but they have an easy ride until they catch up)

    10 years might be hard, but 50 is easy, there is a good chance i'll be a live, but to old to learn it right, and my kids (when they happen) will have a lot of mandarin and will fine with the new global language

    didnt france veto esperanto because they figured french was already the global language (and it was at the time) but they were proven wrong in less then 30 years?

    -rev

  123. Some observations by JohnnyBolla · · Score: 1

    First off, I am little troubled by the implications of the question "And how is the Internet supposed to draw people together when the same old language barrier still exists?" This question seems to suggest that the internet is supposed to draw people together. The internet in my understanding isn't a philosophical project with an underlying message, it's a data conduit. I imagine the Chinese will find it quite useful for transmitting data. The unity thing may be a nice side effect, but I don't think the global infrastructure is having cash dumped into it at this rate for a sense of community.
    As for the "truly on the internet thing", I'm not sure what that means to you, but if I get your drift you are having a philosophical issue with content filtering. In that case, I am not convinced that AOL users are truly on the internet either, or for that matter students, library users, or the customers of many ISP's. Is one truly on the internet if they are blocked at port 80 to prevent webservers, or if a University blocks Napster, or a company blocks XP terminal services? Australians have content filtering as well, in my understanding. In fact, Americans are restricted legally from viewing content that is acceptable in Scandinavian countries.
    I am not sure if the Chinese charectar system provides more or less data density per byte than my alphabet, but that could be a factor in the future concerning linguistic conventions. If it's more efficient to transmit the concept "my dog has fleas" in Chinese charecters than in this alphabet, no worries. If the byte count is significantly higher in Chinese then English might become their standard.
    I have read on Slashdot before that the Chinese are big fans of open source in principle if not in practice. I would think a billion Linux users would be a boon to the internet.
    I suppose in my opinion the long and the short of it is this. If you are connected to the internet, send your data through it. Welcome. What that data is and the political ideology behind it is is none of my concern. There are a ton of webpages out there right now that I can't read and it doesn't diminish my enjoyment and use of the resource.

    --
    Carpe Deez
  124. MHO by TV-SET · · Score: 0, Troll

    I disagree with both methodology and the result of the prediction. As to methodology - I cannot offer anything better ;-)

    But result is also wrong. AFAIK (sorry, no URL) India is the second population/growth-population wise country in the world. Therefor "indian" is then supposed to be the second language to be used on the web in the future. But the problem is that there is no such language as "indian". There are plenty of dialects instead, which make English a unifying language for India. Now, I guess we should add all those native English speakers to all those Indian netters, then we add all those who consider English to be international language, and I would say that English is the winner over Chineese.

    Also, Chineese is difficult to learn, multi-byte, different direction language, which makes it absolutely not convinient for Internet usage.

    Taking "real--time cool translators" unknown out of equation, my bet would be on English.

    --
    Leonid Mamtchenkov ...i don't need your civil war...
  125. bs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Most of China is impoverished.

    Been to China in the last 25 or so years? Apparently not.

    This, again, is clearly from the mouth of someone with a Western/CNN/Today Show molded point of view.

    Stop watching the world thru someone else's eyes and go there and find out for yourself. Just because the streets aren't (yet) crowded with BMW's does not mean a country is poor.

    There are other measures of wealth and well-being besides how many stoplights you have to run to get to the next Star Bux.

    Compare your families geo-political history to someone in Beijing...lacks a bit of longevity, no? Are you surrounded by an infrastructure that has been moving millions of people and mega-tons of goods for tens of hundreds of years? No.

    China is measured by a different set of rules than upstart North America.

    Ignorance of something different doesn't mean it's not there.

    Your high doubt is founded on nothing more than your limited experience in the real world. Get out from behind that keyboard and find out how many other different cultures that are on this planet...then look back on your own, and still see if you think the world revolves around you.

    1. Re:bs by IpalindromeI · · Score: 1


      There are other measures of wealth and well-being besides how many stoplights you have to run to get to the next Star Bux.

      There are also other measures of improvishment than wealth and well-being. In this case I was referring more to technological improvishment rather than strictly economic. This is the big obstacle that will prevent English from falling out as the main internet language, because the highest percentages of peoples that are not technologically improverished and are frequently using the internet speak English.

      China is measured by a different set of rules than upstart North America.

      No doubt in some areas. But not concerning the topic around which this discussion revolves, which is their future dominance of the internet, not the geo-political history of the heritage, nor the social and commercial infrastructure. Doubtless this dominance will happen eventually, as they become more technologically immersed, but not in the near future.

      Your high doubt is founded on nothing more than your limited experience in the real world. Get out from behind that keyboard and find out how many other different cultures that are on this planet...then look back on your own, and still see if you think the world revolves around you.

      Unfortunately, experience is all that exists on which to found opinions and beliefs. And I'll take mine any day over the lack of experience which is evident in your ineptness at following a conversation topic and its vocabulary in context; the need to see the world as black and white, where anything disagreeing with your closeminded white must be black; and the hypocrisy with which you tout such experience using the same vehicle for which you berate me.

      --

      --
      Promoting critical thinking since 1994.
  126. nice sized thread... by dz79 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Great thread, folks! Obviously language will be a tense issue until we get together and figure it out.

    For more fun ideas on what it will take to live in a truly global civilization, check out The United Nations: http://www.un.org The World Federalist Association: http://www.wfa.org and for those of you with a spiritual streak, check out the Baha'i Faith: http://www.bahai.org

    Dan
  127. Update Re:Same old language barrier? by Red+Eyes · · Score: 1

    I really hate to respond to my own post but I was wrong about Michelle Kwan. I think it was the CNN showing of Time Magazine's Man of the Year interview with AIDS researcher David Ho did they mention something about his dad or uncle being one of the pioneers in Chinese character encoding. The article I just linked to doesn't mention it so I guess it was edited in before broadcast. While doing some digging, I also found this article about displaying Chinese under ASCII code.

  128. Apple at least thought about this by j3z_ · · Score: 1
    AppleScript uses dialects , but unhappily
    "There is currently no plan to support dialects other than English."
    Wonder if anyone's working on this?
  129. old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    too bad i submitted this two weeks ago...

  130. Plastics and translation software... by freshheimmer · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Plastics and translation software, my boy, Plastics and translation software. These technologies are going places I tell you.

    --
    I think the karma police are after me ... or is it 'cuz I'm
  131. know both by shokk · · Score: 2

    It will be good to know both, so start loading your browsers with the Chinese language fonts and browse a few sites, even with the idea of "knowing your opponent." Get your Chinese language tapes here and start ripping to MP3 so that everyone will benefit. Americans are good at adapting to these things, so let's not fall down on it now. English may be the language of business, but look at what has happened when we ignored Arabic. It has been predicted that within the next 20 years there will be a conflict between the U.S. and China over Taiwan. Could be self-fullfilling, but don't be caught sleeping.

    --
    "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master."
  132. Are you high? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The parent post had no links in it at all...

    Besides, there'snothing wrong with this link at all.

  133. 's/Chinese citizen/AOL subscriber/g' by doubleyou · · Score: 1
    Would you even consider the average wealthy Chinese citizen with online access truly 'on the Internet'?

    Would you even consider the average wealthy AOL subscriber with online access truly 'on the Internet'?

    ;)
  134. Spanish by spoonyfork · · Score: 1
    When the "average" Chinese middle class citizen can suddenly afford expensive consumer electronics with public internet access and a credit card to buy stuff with, then we might see the kind of shit this article posits.

    Well before that happens, if ever, I think we'll see other more progressive language groups migrate to the public internet with disposable incomes. I have a feeling that we'll be seeing a lot more Spanish language (optional or primary) internet resources before we'll be seeing Chinese.

    --
    Speak truth to power.
  135. Chinese within North America by lamj · · Score: 1

    There is a considerable size of Chinese population here in North America (YES, I am part of it), I have seen report saying that in couple of years, there will be more Chinese speaking population in Canada than the French speaking (an official language).
    The point is, the 10 billion mainland Chinese people are not the ONLY Chinese, there are MANY Chinese that have un-censored Internet out here, such as Hong Kong, Taiwan....

    Different languages material on the web should co-exist on the web without any problem, just as they do in real life. Here in Toronto, there are two Chinese Newspapers and countless Chinese signs all around the city and it never seems to poses any problem. The web should work the same.

    In fact, there are already tons Chinese materials on the web, due to the lack of understanding of Chinese by most "westerners", most websites are not visited by most "westerners" for obvious reasons so it does not seems a large community on the web.

  136. Demographics by sn0wcrsh · · Score: 0

    People claim that Chinese will be the language of the 'net within five years. This is easy to understand when you consider that roughly 25% of the World's Population is Chinese.

    But only 5-10% of that population has access to the resources to make net use possible. By these numbers, the mainland chinese can only hope to comprise 2.5% of the potential net users. Tight government restrictions and a largely uneducated populus are crippling china's entrance into the world online community.

    Contrary to the government propaganda, a large segment of people in china are uneducated.
    This is a direct result of Mao's policy of ransacking universities and persecuting the educated chinese during the "cultural revolution". My father's friend (a professor) was put into the fields to be "re-educated" by the farmers.

    As you may imagine, many of the educated chinese have left for other countries. (Taiwan, Hong Kong, Vancouver Canada, etc...). It is no suprise that these areas have done so well. They represent the best of chinese culture.

    Chinese will never be the dominant language on the net. Not so long as the Communist government is in power.

  137. Fun fact by cje · · Score: 2

    Maybe (relatively) few Chinese speak English ..

    Actually, there are more English-speaking people in China than there are in the United States!

    Of course, China has a bit of a population advantage .. :-)

    --
    We're going down, in a spiral to the ground
    1. Re:Fun fact by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do not expect sql*kitten to refrain from opening his mouth and speaking of things he knows nothing about. He is more than happy to talk about things he knows little about.

  138. RE:Two words: machine translation by kilroy_hau · · Score: 1

    Here is your post, courtesy of machine transalation (english->chinese->english)

    And how should the Internet together attract the person when the similarly old language á pass still had?

    You will affirm it? Two words: Machine translation. It are starting the now change well and when the time most Chinese people can enter the non- limit the network, it should be good. I were not saying, software perfectly will translate Shakespeare but behaves as one should the translator? My guess is, who will it help the cross this barrier comparison to be just like people say the language because their second but will not be the specialized linguistics. We have us eat thousand years similar question but we very quickly have the method solve it. Many machines translate 10 years ago?

    --


    Kilroy was here!
  139. Fire Wall of China? by lowtekneq · · Score: 1

    What about the so called "Great fire wall of china"? Can they even view sites that aren't chinese (made in china :P, not just written in chinese)?

    --
    Carpe meam simiam!
  140. POOOOOORN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For all of us that missed out on the Dot-com bubble, now is the time to get ready for China...

    Think about it, an entire repressed people hungry for e-porn... and willing to put up $$$ for amonimity... I can see the cash truck backing up to my door right now.

    OK so that is just wrong, but hey, so are most other get rich schemes.

  141. Chinese Lesson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, I can't seem to get GB to work here either, but I'd say "first post" should be shou3 tie1 -- BB posts on the Mainland are commonly described as tie1 (stickers) and shou3 is a common pre-fix meaning initial or first, e.g. shou3 che1 (the first bus of the day on a bus route).

  142. Chinese being difficult by lamj · · Score: 1

    For those of you that think Chinese is hard to learn. The Chinese that are being used nowadays is already consider to be easy to use.

    In early 1900's, there was a movement to simplify the sentence structure and grammer. That really make Chinese much easier to learn. This would be like the old style of english (Thou, Thy, Thee..) being converting to the english we use nowdays. From my experience, it should take about 10 years of constant pratice to master the new style and another 10-15 to master the old style.

    Another major change is much more recent, the Chinese government decided that it is too difficult to read and write Chinese characters which are based on symbols so they simplified a lot of the characters. This version of Chinese (usually under GB encoding on the web) is widely used in China. Most other Chinese speaking places, like Hong Kong, Taiwan and Singapore still uses the Normal non-simplified version of Chinese.

  143. English in China by alexalexis · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Because of the massive movement in China to teach it's children English, there have been a few estimates that say there will be more English speakers in China than there are in North America and Europe combined, by the year 2010.

    After traveling around China, I'm somewhat skeptical ... but I can pretty much guarantee that the majority of people with Internet connections will have basic English skills. Only the priviledged and educated classes have regular access to computers, and that's a pretty miniscule percentage of the Chinese population.

    As a slightly off topic side node, what really surprised me about China was the lack of Communism. Sure, there's a good amount of government subsidising, but it's basically the same as it is in the United States ... only the people doling out the cash seem to band together and spend all the money in one place at a time .. like Bejing, for the upcoming olympics in 2008. It's basicaly a capitalistic, entrepenurial country, and it won't surprise me if the Internet floodgates spring open in the next five years.

  144. that, and he needs to put the crack pipe down by hawk · · Score: 2

    >this is an obvious (and mathematically correct)
    >conclusion.


    It is neither obvious, nor mathematically correct. And since when is "chinese" a language? Does he mean mandaring?


    The simple and relevant mathematical fact is that more people speak english than any other language, and taht gap is likely to widen. English will increase its dominance not because its spoken in the U.S., but because it is the language of commerce.


    Yes, there's probably in the neighborhood of a billion mandarin speakers. As you point out, this doesn't mean that they can all use the internet. Furthermore, guess what second language those that can afford the internet are more likely to speak?


    hawk

    1. Re:that, and he needs to put the crack pipe down by Galvatron · · Score: 2

      If we're talking about the internet, then "Chinese" is correct, because written characters are the same regardless of whether one speaks Mandarin, Cantonese, or even, largely, Japanese.

      --
      "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
    2. Re:that, and he needs to put the crack pipe down by UberChuckie · · Score: 0

      That's not quite true. There's tradition and simplified characters. Knowing how to read tradition characters does not mean you know how to read simplified characters.

  145. There is no language barrier by aminorex · · Score: 1

    Or at least, it is only a speedbump. I know no
    Chinese to speak of, but I chat up the college
    girls from Guangzhou to Haerbin on a regular basis
    using OICQ and Babelfish. Eventually they all
    start to learn English, which takes the bloom off
    the rose for me, and I dump them.

    Funny thing is, that Chinese-speaking majority
    is going to be spending most of its free time
    learning English, so they can get out of China.

    --
    -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
  146. There'll need to be a war by sean23007 · · Score: 1

    China will never willingly change that much toward the ideals of the west. If even 50% of the Chinese in China are going to get on the web, there'll need to be a war, in which the People revolt against their current government, demanding freedom. It worked for America (though it still took a long time to get onto the internet... ;) ).

    Now you get into this question: would you rather have complete freedom for another billion people to have the theoretical possibility of getting on the net, or would you rather have peace? I take peace.

    --

    Lack of eloquence does not denote lack of intelligence, though they often coincide.
  147. It's A Lot Easier Than You Think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just watch kids in Taiwan (with one input system) and the Mainland (with another) send e-mails or chat -- they ZOOM. Inputting characters simply isn't the hurdle a lot of Westerners imagine it to be. The software's intelligent and guesses, fairly accurately, what characters are being input, even though theoretically there may be dozens of possibilities, and also permits a lot of shorthand. To be honest, there's immense naivete in the West about the level of development in Mainland China, and not just in the computer field.

  148. Is a radically filtered 'Net really the 'Net? by Infonaut · · Score: 2
    If I only had access to email from inside the United States, web sites that conformed to a narrow ideological range (ACLU, Sierra Club, Greenpeace, NPR), could that really be considered use of the Internet?

    Perhaps a better way of saying it would be, "The Chinese will account for the highest percentage of users of Internet technology".

    Take away unimpeded access to content, and all you have is a giant socio-capitalist WAN.

    --
    Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ
  149. Re: Internet Shit Feast by DrSpin · · Score: 1
    Is it me or did the title illusively (subliminally) read "Internet Shit Feast"

    Damn, you've cracked my 1024 bit encraption scheme.

  150. Re:Two words: machine translation by ZigMonty · · Score: 2
    Wow! You sure proved me wrong. I just checked it on babelfish. I still stand by my comment that by the time the Chinese net users outnumber English speaking users, the MT software will be usable. But, as you showed, it definitely isn't there yet!

    Looking at it, a lot of the mistakes are words not in its dictionary (net -> network), asymmetric synonyms (same problem -> similar question) ie. both phrases are probably the same in chinese but different in english, and general word order problems. I could *almost* understand it though.

    How did eat get in there?!

    Maybe this stuff won't get really practical until the software understands what you're saying, ie. rudimentary AI.

  151. True right now if measured by Spam by dananderson · · Score: 1
    Well if you measure Internet usage by the amount of spam that is sent (at least received by me), it's certainly true right now that China, Hong Kong, Japan, and South Korea are "hot spots" right now in the Internet.

    Hopefully, they will mature in the near future and be less abusive of the 'net. For now, I have to filter them out with sendmail to maintain my sanity :-).

    1. Re:True right now if measured by Spam by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      Typical Spam Content: !@#$%
      Typical Reply to Spam: !@#$%!

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  152. Transparent Babelfish, Stupid by Saeger · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Even if Chinese did become the predominate online language in a decade, so what?

    It's a virtual certainty that before 2010 most operating systems -- including the one in your "phone" -- will have a language translation module built-in, enabling anyone to communicate with anyone else in their native spoken and written language (if for no other reason, it's good for business).

    "Universal Translators" are hardly science fiction...

    --

    --
    Power to the Peaceful
  153. Hi, Mr. Isolationist checking in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And how is the Internet supposed to draw people together when the same old language barrier still exists

    A better question, and no, this isn't a troll, is why would I want to be drawn together with the Chinese? The barriers between western and eastern societies are too difficult to overcome, and for good reason. American Democracy/Corporatocracy and Chinese Communism are radically different ideologies that can never coexist together.

    I for one am glad that there is a language barrier.

  154. I doubt it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if translation software continues to improve, and also content providers start using intelligent methods of authoring (like using XML types of solutions) allowing content to be 'known' not just read, then yes Chinese has a chance. However, considering the syntax of chinese I doubt it. I think Chinese and Japanese are fascinating languages, but they do not lend themselves well to modern, much less future intercommunications. The recent alphabets do indeed help, however. I just hope that people do not adopt the attitude that lead to the extinction of languages out of misuse.

  155. No it won't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In five years, everyone will have China firewalled just to keep from drowning in spam. Lots of people already do.

  156. Orwell's 1984? by PeeOnYou2 · · Score: 1

    How about Newspeak anyone?

  157. Yup by autopr0n · · Score: 2

    I do really like English for its expressive power. I don't know Chinese that well but I have a feeling that even if I did I still wouldn't be quite as 'flowery' with my language as in English.

    One thing that always bugged me about these 'synthetic' languages is that they all try to be super-logical and easy to learn. I always thought it would be cool to create a language optimized for complexity and expressiveness of connotation.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    1. Re:Yup by klui · · Score: 1

      One can be expressive using Chinese as well, but takes many years of practice. My dad was reading a book of small stories and I had asked about what kinds of stories these were. Each story was about 5-10 pages long. But the text were composed in such a way that a sentence took around several minutes of explanation from my father. He "translated" a paragraph but it took around 45 minutes to an hour.

  158. What? by autopr0n · · Score: 2

    WTF? Taiwan was created when the capitalist government fled as Mao's CCP took over the mainland. In fact the Republic of China on Taiwan claimed to be the legitemate government of all of china for a long time. Up untill the 1970s they were recognized by the UN as such.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  159. Overcoming the language barrier by stew77 · · Score: 1

    The internet can help overcoming the language barrier. In fact, most of my english skills are from the internet. If it wasn't for web pages, usenet and mailing lists I wouldn't have had the opportunity to exercice written english that easily from Germany. Reading and writing kept my enlish alive, and it really pays off when visiting english speaking countries: I still have a German accent, but I have hardly any problems constructing and understanding even complex sentence structures.

  160. Re: Close, but not quite... by TDScott · · Score: 1

    I normally use Opera, but for this I had to switch to IE6: the Fish outputted the right codes and IE6 could copy and paste them, in their original Japanese form, straight into the text box.

  161. Language mangling by dvdeug · · Score: 2

    Give yourself a universal translator and it don't matter what language you speak or use.

    "You give my cousin a ball." is impossible, without context, to correctly translate to German (one of English's closest relatives, linguistically.) German has no word for cousin - Vetter, Kousine are for male, female cousin, respectively. "You" translates to either "Sie" if you aren't good friends, or "du" if you are.

    As a further note, even human translators (which don't have to worry about the hard AI problem) don't do perfect translations everytime. There's dozens of translations of the Iliad to English, because the translator felt the previous one's hadn't been good enough. Translation relays are done, and the results are just like the game telephone - at the end, the message bears little relation to the start.

    the same technology can and will be used to translate human languages into programming language

    Why do mathematicians use mathematical notation instead of writing it in a human language? Because a human language is too imprecise, too clumsy and too hard to read for what they need done. There are and will be improvements in programming languages, but massive precision is necessary in programming. It's easy to write a word processor or a web browser; it's hard to get all the features specified exactly in a standards compliant manner.

    1. Re:Language mangling by 3seas · · Score: 2

      ""You give my cousin a ball." is impossible, without context, to correctly translate to German "

      Yes, there are limitations in the expressiveness of any language, including mathmatics and programming languages. For they are all "abstract" and that is also what they have in common. That they are abstract tools which are used to communicate. So in the case of "cousin" you have a choice. You can either create a german word that is defined to be what a "cousin" is in the family tree, or you can use the word "cousin" by defining it in the vocabulary of German to identify what "cousin" is in the family tree.

      The point is to communicate, not trip over the abstract tools being used. If you ever listen in on a Asian language conversation, don't be supprised if you hear an english word or name being used. But instead note that the party using it either doesn't know the asian word or there is not one.

      Mathmatics is a subset of the sum total of all absractions and even math has self imposed limitations such as Godel's Theorem and Alan Turnings Halting Problem. But these are just the limitations of the abstraction set being used.

      Programming. What is programming but the act of automating the use of something more complex (yet made up of simple things). Automation on top of automation on top of automation, etc. and it all comes down to the fundamental equation of "word = definition" be it human language, mathmatics, or programming language. The syntax and semantics of use are only the dynamics of how a given abstraction set is defined to be used, and something that can as well be automated.

      Ultimately the task of automating translation is so big or in need of being versatile that the only way to accomplish it is to do it in a manner that allows any and all to participate when and where they choose.

      And what that means is that the natural laws of the physical phenomenon or abstraction mechanics needs to be identified, that is the action constants. And from there moved into an openly accessible configuration of computer functionality that represents the action constants, so as to supply a non-patentable common user interface for user controlled integration. A tool that allows participation by all who so choose to do so.

      Though IBM autonomic computing direction doesn't identify such a core of "action constants" functionality, they do recognize the need to be open (regardless of the fact that they are the leading US patent holder and generator/obtainer).

      Maybe see other slashdot posts and home page of yours truely?

    2. Re:Language mangling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I ran this through my universal translator, and this is what I got:

      ""

      nothing. Now what does that tell me about the poster?

  162. China by nstrom · · Score: 1

    I used the internet in Beijing over the summer (over several dialup lines and an ISDN line), and had no problems viewing websites like CNN, Voodoo Extreme, AnandTech, or Astalavista, or telnetting to my university's server.

  163. It's not a shift. by hnchou · · Score: 1

    It is expanding, and that's a good thing for the community as a whole, since more varieties and choices.

    I don't see the notion of majority would make much sense on Internet. If eastern audiences don't like the way Internet works, they would eventually come up their solutions. If western audiences are interested in easter information, translation services will prosper. It they don't like each other, well that hurts nobody.

  164. Am I truly 'on the Internet'? by ModifiedDog · · Score: 1
    Would you even consider the average wealthy Chinese citizen with online access truly 'on the Internet'?

    I'm in the process of being punted from MediaOne/Road Runner to Comcast. I just got my new contract. I can't host shell accounts, run a web server, e-mail server, ftp server. In fact, I'm not allowed to run any kind of server! So am I truly 'on the Internet' anymore?

  165. Can learn medicine and law without knowing latin by jellybear · · Score: 1

    Most Americans don't know latin--even those studying medicine and law. Yet the technical terms are all in latin. People learn the jargon and ignore the underlying language. I see foreigners taking the same approach to "English" computer languages. It is not such a great obstacle.

  166. I suppose that means more Chinese Spam? by libertynews · · Score: 1

    I've noticed a recent increase in spam with odd character encoding, mostly Chinese I think. Good thing my spam filter is running well.

    --
    Remember Lexington Green!
  167. One Way To Stop The Marginalization of English by Rareul · · Score: 1

    With language-centricity as our blindfold, we must fuck like rabbits!

    See The Free Voyeurweb for inspiration.

    ?sp

  168. international domain names by uofhead · · Score: 1

    For those of you interesting in reading about the current work being done on resolving Foreign Characters. See the work that the idn group is doing IDN

  169. Translation? Re:Fairly meaningless by 3seas · · Score: 1

    Genuine Software Engineering (genuine computer science) as in what has yet to be done, rather than having been distracted by the carrot of money since the mid 1950's.

    There have been other slashdot articles in the past addressing one or more aspects of this money distraction of computer science research.

    ----
    SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN - Sept. 1994
    Article - "Software's Chronic Crisis"
    The article also goes more into solution efforts with software development on large scale projects. But finding consistent solutions are still hard to come by.

    Mary M. Shaw of Carnegie Mellon University, observes a parallel between chemical engineering evolution and software engineering evolution. However, this evolution has not made the connection between science and commercialization required to establish a consistent experimental foundation for professional software engineering.
    ----

    Translation? If I only explain ideas in rants, they are not real?

    Rants? is this related to opinions or judgements or physics and nature? Sender or receiver perspective?

    1. Re:Translation? Re:Fairly meaningless by scrytch · · Score: 2

      Genuine Software Engineering (genuine computer science) as in what has yet to be done, rather than having been distracted by the carrot of money since the mid 1950's.

      Congratulations. Here's your nomination.

      --
      I've finally had it: until slashdot gets article moderation, I am not coming back.
  170. Nonsense by GCP · · Score: 1

    "I see similarities between Chinese people who read the People's Daily and westerners who watch CNN"

    What a foolish statement. Sometimes people actually believe things like this. Other times, they resort to it thinking they can fool others.

    It's really just another example of "for every number you can find between zero and a million I can find a number between zero and one, so one and a million are essentially equal" reasoning that is all the rage on the political left. There's good and bad on both sides, so therefore both sides are *equally* good and bad. If you counter with "well, what about..?", I'll match you with a counter example. So there. Equal.

    It's utter nonsense to claim that a publicly-owned commercial news broadcast that knows its audience regularly listens to its competitors and compares stories is essentially equal to the official voice of a single party regime that uses violence to suppress contradictory reporting.

    Ah, but you didn't say the news organizations were equal, you protest, you said you saw "similarities" between the viewers. Yeah, and I can find "similarities" between any two things, so either your statement is content-free or it meant what it implied but didn't say, so I'll react to the implication.

    I'm in a clear minority, but I almost always reject claims of the basic form: I can come up with minor complaints about X to match every major complaint you have about Y, so we have to conclude that one is no better than the other.

    That's nonsense.

    --
    "Those who have never entered upon scientific pursuits know not a tithe of the poetry by which they are surrounded."
  171. China has a 30M people city by dalutong · · Score: 1

    It is in SiChuan. it is called chongqing. (on the yangze river)... it is a municipality the size of austria with 30M+ people.

    --

    What comes first, finding a teacher or becoming a student?
  172. B*llshit by dalutong · · Score: 1

    I grew up in china (a white guy) and have stayed in caves with peasants whos sons are off in the local town/city working and then buying their parents VCD players and TVs. Computers in the cave? no. but he has a motorcycle and a lot of chickens.

    --

    What comes first, finding a teacher or becoming a student?
  173. Here's your post.... by xX_sticky_Xx · · Score: 1

    English to Chinese to English again:

    Since Chinese becomes occupies the superiority on-line language in ten years, so what? This is the true assurance -- before includes that in 2010 operating systems " -- has the language in yours " telephone translates the module inlays, causes any person to pass the credit with any person their local speech and the written language (if for other reasons, it has not been is good for business). " universal translator " nearly is not the science fantasizes... -- the " politics is the swing and ±©Õ stimulates in anarchy by the permanent rejuvenated illusion Ú. "

    I think the "universal translator" has a ways to go.

    --

    ---

    I didn't want to leave this space blank.
  174. Re: Input methods... by PurpleBob · · Score: 2

    You know, it's pretty impressive that the Chinese can adapt to all that, while here in the English-speaking world we're still stuck using QWERTY keyboards.

    --
    Win dain a lotica, en vai tu ri silota
  175. Re: Teaching pinyin... by PurpleBob · · Score: 2

    Determining the number of Chinese characters is just like determining the number of English words in that regard.

    ENABLE, a public-domain word list for English (which I have installed over /usr/dict/words because the latter is so uselessly incomplete), says that there are 173528 words in the English language. However, let me pick a few at random:

    inulase, euglenoids, riprap, smarter, dilatancy, hebe, staff, thrombosis, upwaft, superintend

    A couple of these are absolutely familiar (smarter, staff). A couple have meanings which could be figured out fairly easily but which aren't especially familiar (upwaft, superintend). As for the rest, does anybody know what a euglenoid is?

    --
    Win dain a lotica, en vai tu ri silota
  176. Japanese is much simpler than English by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No plurals, hardly any tenses, much more regular vowels, with katakana or hiragana a decent spelling sytstem (though Korean would claim to have the best spelling system in the world)
    It's just a pity about Kanji :-(

  177. 99% english? hahaha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thus speaks someone who obviously has never tried to convert an arcade game. 250,000 lines of assembler with japanese comments... not much fun (luckily for me, I wasn't the one who had to do it; the guy eventually wrote an automatic translator/partial emulator). Do you really think that all those programmers in Tokyo and Kyoto write in English for your benefit???

    But then, this is a linux web site, and they are not aware of the existance of video games... (apart from Quake).

  178. Just don't use vi as your editor! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The world has moved on...

  179. are there that many chinese pages atm??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it seems that non native english speakers are forced to learn it due to the fact that the majority of the content atm is in english surely this is and ever i ncreasing spiral?? whats to say the chinese arent simply learing english from using the net?? Anyway in 10 years time itll be the browser software whiuch will translate input and output on the flie for us and the internet will not be anything like we know it now due to the crapness of the 20 year technology

  180. Ignorance by cuteduo · · Score: 0

    Learn chinese. The US has pretty much forced
    the rest of the world to learn English and
    doesn't even require its own citizens to learn
    other languages! Maybe this will force a change
    once a half way decent portion of the chinese/asian population is on the internet.

  181. So sad... by GCP · · Score: 1

    "Color" came from Latin. That's how it's spelled in Latin. All Latin-based languages spell it that way...except one: French. The Brits have always been culturally cowed by the French. Not so the Americans, to the outrage of both Brits and French.

    As for why American standards are replacing British standards far more than the reverse, it's not some sort of cheating. It's the natural result of greater economic, technological, and cultural significance. It may not please you to hear that, but it's a process that has driven linguistic change for millennia.

    --
    "Those who have never entered upon scientific pursuits know not a tithe of the poetry by which they are surrounded."
  182. Language barrier? by CAIMLAS · · Score: 2

    One world language, simple. It's bound to happen - progress has been made in this area for years with the near-global adoption of English as a second language.
    Of course, this just meshes perfectly with the One World Government, Language, and Religion that's been prophecied for years... quite a few years.

    --
    ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  183. And we want Chinese money by GCP · · Score: 1

    Interesting you should say that. I agree with everything you say until your final sentence, which I'd like to comment on.

    I work for an American company that's quite interested in making more money from the Chinese. As a result, we're putting a lot of effort into sinicizing our products and Web apps.

    I know many other US companies doing likewise. As you said, speak the customer's language.

    --
    "Those who have never entered upon scientific pursuits know not a tithe of the poetry by which they are surrounded."
  184. english-speaking? Who cares... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While it is true that not many China people speak english well, the web does not depend on speech. There are many, many Chinese people who read and write VERY well - they just have trouble speaking.

    Also, "east" refers to Asia in general. India has 1 billion people, most of whom speak, read, and write english fluently. If you add, Vietnam, Thailand, Japan and Indonesia into the equation, we are probably totaling about 1 billion people who are English literate.

    So statistically speaking, the web will probably move "east".

  185. They must be trained first! by billcopc · · Score: 1

    Before Chinese starts taking over the net, I hope someone will have the decency to teach them proper web design and the importance of good signal-to-noise ratios. I've often bounced around foreign-language sites in search of specific information, relying on babelfish. Most asian sites I've been to are just awful: piles upon piles of jumbled links that lead to more piles of links. My old netscape bookmark page was easier to navigate than these things. Even the commercial sites are incredibly hard to decipher.

    --
    -Billco, Fnarg.com